Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Correspondence
411 ‘, March 10, 2005 A.- ` . EEA Architects P. C CITY OF TIGAR® Greg Weiler OREGON 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: BUP2004 -00529 Construction Type: II - 1HR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E -1, A2.1, B, S1 Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99-01) 1999 edition. The following information is required in order to complete the review. Per our phone conversation yesterday March 9, 2005 you were going to provide the following information as attachments or revised plans; 1. Clarification on glass located inside corridor on whether% hour rated or sprinkler protected. OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2.2. 2. Clarification on where the fire resistive construction details as designed per UL are located in the revised plans. OSSC 106.3 3. Clarification on exit sign located on library side at computer room access. Occupant load on computer room based of this sign will require two exits from computer room. Therefore, remove sign or provide second exit from computer room. OSSC 1004.2.3.3 4. Clarification on play area at West and East ends of school on whether yards enclosed or not. The requirement for dispersal/gate hardware will be required if enclosed. OSSC 1006.3.5, 1007.3.11 Please provide an item by item response. When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectfully, i Henz- , Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 February 14, 2005 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Greg Weiler 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: BUP2004 -00529 Construction Type: II - 1HR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E -1, A2.1, B, S1 Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stones: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -01) 1999 edition. The following information is required prior to the approval of the submitted plans. 1. All responses have been received and accepted for review under this permit number. In order to complete the plan review process we need THREE complete sets of plans depicting actual construction to be done. 2. Please complete attached Building Survey Report. Our records show the report has not been received. When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respect Ily, Val He el, Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 ( January 22, 2005 ^^ 1 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Greg Weiler 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: BUP2004-00529 Construction Type: II - 1HR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E -1, A2.1, B, S1 Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -01) 1999 edition. The following information is required prior to the approval of the submitted plans. FIRE LIFE AND SAFITY REVIEW 1. Provide clarification on court yard/play area exiting where kindergarten and corridor exits. OSSC 1006.3.5, 1007.3.11 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 2. Provide clarification on occupant load and exiting from computer room with library occupants using this room as intervening room for exiting. OSSC 1007.3.4, 1003.3.1.5 & Table 10 -A RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 3. Provide clarification on storage room under stairs is sprinkled. OSSC 904.2.4.3, 1003.3.3.9, RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 4. Provide clarification on East covered play area exiting where corridor exits. OSSC 1006.3.5, 1007.3.11 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 5. Provide clarification on glazing for fire restive system used for windows in the corridor. OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2.2, 713.8 & 9 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/21/05 6. Provide clarification on intervening room smoke detection system. OSSC 1007.3.4 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 7. Provide clarification on means of egress identification areas. OSSC 1003.2.8 & 1109.15 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 8. Provide clarification on why corridors walls at play area exits are not 1 hour rated as required per OSSC 1004.3.4.3. 1005.3.1 (Opening are exempt per OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2 and Table 5 -A.) RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 9. Provide masonry veneer design. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 10. Provide clarification on manufacturer's information on walk -in cooler /freezer showing approved by the State of Oregon. Oregon Administrative Rule 918 -674 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 11. Provide clarification on locations of draft stops and assemblies. OSSC 708.3.1.2.2. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 12. Provide fire restive construction assemblies details as designed per UL. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 13. Provide information on Boiler room location and construction details. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 MECHANICAL 14. Review not included with this permit. Please provide an item by item response. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Truss Joist Shop Drawings, etc, will be charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the portion of the work being deferred. The minimum fee shall be $200.00. Deferred items; • Fire Alarms • Fire Sprinklers When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respect // at He el, Senior Plans Examiner January 12, 2005 c="'i •, °'�' CI 0;F TIGARD Greg Weiler 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: BUP2004 -00529 Construction Type: II - 1HR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E -1, A2.1, B, SI Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -01) 1999 edition. The following information is required prior to the approval of the submitted plans. FIRE LIFE AND SAFITY REVIEW 1. Provide clarification on court yard/play area exiting where kindergarten and corridor exits. OSSC 1006.3.5, 1007.3.11 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 2. Provide clarification on occupant load and exiting from computer room with library occupants using this room as intervening room for exiting. OSSC 1007.3.4, 1003.3.1.5 & Table 10 -A RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 3. Provide clarification on storage room under stairs is sprinkled. OSSC 904.2.4.3, 1003.3.3.9, RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 4. Provide clarification on East covered play area exiting where corridor exits. OSSC 1006.3.5, 1007.3.11 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 5. Provide clarification on glazing for fire restive system used for windows in the corridor. OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2.2, 713.8 & 9 RESPONSE INCOMPLETE NEED FURTHER INFORMATION 1/12/05 6. Provide clarification on intervening room smoke detection system. OSSC 1007.3.4 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 7. Provide clarification on means of egress identification areas. OSSC 1003.2.8 & 1109.15 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 8. Provide clarification on why corridors walls at play area exits are not 1 hour rated as required per OSSC 1004.3.4.3. 1005.3.1 (Opening are exempt per OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2 and Table 5 -A.) RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 9. Provide masonry veneer design. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 10. Provide clarification on manufacturer's information on walk -in cooler /freezer showing approved by the State of Oregon. Oregon Administrative Rule 918 -674 RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 11. Provide clarification on locations of draft stops and assemblies. OSSC 708.3.1.2.2. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 12. Provide fire restive construction assemblies details as designed per UL. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 13. Provide information on Boiler room location and construction details. RESPONSE ACCEPTED 1/12/05 MECHANICAL 14. Review not included with this permit. Please provide an item by item response. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Truss Joist Shop Drawings, etc, will be charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the portion of the work being deferred. The minimum fee shall be $200.00. Deferred items; • Fire Alarms • Fire Sprinklers When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respe f Val Henz , �% Senior Plans Examiner • ' 1 111 1 1 1 Ti January 3, 2005 c'y' CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Greg Weiler 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: BUP2004 -00529 Construction Type: II - 1HR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E - -1, A2.1, B, S1 Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -01) 1999 edition. The following information is required in order to complete the review. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 1. Provide clarification on locations of draft stops and assemblies. OSSC 708.3.1.2.2. 2. Provide fire restive construction assemblies details as designed per UL. 3. Provide information on Boiler room location and construction details. Please provide an item by item response. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Truss Joist Shop Drawings, etc, will be charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the portion of the work being deferred. The minimum fee shall be $200.00. Deferred items; • Fire Alarms • Fire Sprinklers When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Resp lly ,,,,, Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 01/03/2005 15:36 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 07/07 e-----A1/03/2005 14:13 5036243681 TIGARD BUILDING DEPT ' PAGE 02/02 n� �t� "JII�Iii iii lank t'� January 3, 2005 ° �� J44/ o ([�� ie� CITY OF TIG Rb Greg Weiler e V � i ty pp `� e ggs OREGON P 1230 SW First Ave., ortland, Oregon 97204 0 0 /N� V/ Oi RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Pa 'ect linfo pation Site Permit: RUP2004 - 00529 Construction Type; II - IHR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E-1, A2.1, B, Si Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -01) 1999 edition. The following information is required in order to complete the review. PRELIMINARY REVIEW L Provide clarification on locations of draft stops and assemblies. QSSC 708.3.1.2.2. 2. Provide fire restive construction assemblies details as designed per UL, 3_ Provide infbrmation on Boiler room location and construction details. Please provide an item by item response. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fite Sprinkler, Truss joist Shop Drawings, etc, will be charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the portion of the work being deferred. The minimum fee shall be $200.00. Deferred items; to Fire Alarms • Fire Sprinklers When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Itl G � Val Henze', Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171. TDD (503) 684 -2772 ._ 01/03/2005 15:36 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 02/07 [ . 2001 FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (13XRH) ..FIRE RESISTANCE DIFR (BXFH) 819 Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI /Ul Fire Resistance Ra • - ANSI/UT. 2. • .4 - Contin 1 blocks. One or more layers of rigid extr I Pd'L Design. No: J1906 " -. . in. thick roar having 1 in. min air space b1 G2 Bearing l Rating - 2 HR. THE DOW CHEMICAL CO i Nonbearing Wall Rating - 2 kit. OC CELFORTEC INC OWENS CORNING SPECIALTY j.3,4° - (Optional -Not shai FOAM PRODUCTS -Type 150 � 6A. m"' L'J s�5' 2t Foamed pl ' ed Plastic"' - insulation for u l'J �� C .� (� a pp yyerss Miq Crete blocks. One or more layers of rigi _i___- oi tion, 4 in. thick max having 1 in. min a Ho rIzontet Section blocks. •• BPB AMERICA I NC . 1. Concrete Blocks* Nominal 6 by 8 by 16 in hollow or solid_ s $PB CELOTEX Type erir><vc Th Classification D -2 (2 hr). " "'Bearing the UL Classification Mark • ) ANCHOR CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC • - - • - • • • - ' Allowable compressive stress of 57% of max allowable compressive ; Design No. U904 stress in accordance with the empirical "design method. Bearing Wall Ra • - 3 HR. BETCO BLOCK & PRODUCTS INC, DBA ARTHUR WHITCOMB Nonbearin Wall ]Zatrng - 3 HR. WESTBROOK CONCRETE BLOCK CO INC f3 /y° " Allowable compressive stress of 75.6% of max allowable compressive x, 7 p-" --` — — — - - — -- - — - -r-- � stress in accordance with the empirical design method. S ". . ,e_• O . •∎••1 • ', ''j' - ' a . : . . 0 . •' 0'. Tti „ ! 2. M ortar- Blocks ]aid in full bed of mortar m- no 3/8 in. thick, of not ' PI ' 1S . � 7.5/8” MIN- less than 2 -1/4 and not more than 3X/2 parts of clean sharp sand to 1 -4 ° ; �J ; � -" � ' part Portland cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 - ' ... ,. "I - • r . ° _ * .ercent hydrated lime cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. O (� Y O Horizonsol Section - .. .4„,..„..,.,....,......,,,,,,4„,..i....±..k.thax„._ 1. Concrete Blocks " - Various designs. Classification C -3 (3 hr). ,: See Concrete Blocks category for list of eligible manufacturers. • BPB AMERICA INC -~ L. 2. Mortar- Blocks laid in full bed of mortar nom. 3/8 in. thick, of not - BPB CELOTEX-Type Thermax less than 2-1/4 and not more than 3-1/2 parts of clean sharp sand to 1 'Tearing the Uf, Classification Mark • part Portland. cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 percent hydrated line (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. 3. Portland Cement Stucco or Gypsum Plaster- Add 1/2 hr to Classifi- �es illTo- 17gD7 ----ji cation if used. Attached to concrete bolcks (Item 1). gn s 4. Loose Masonry Fill- If all core spaces are filled with loose dry Nonbearing Wall Rating - 3 or 4 fIR. 1 1 expanded slag, expanded clay or shale (Rotary Kiln Process), water (See Item 1) k" repellant vermlcu rte masonry fill insulation, or silicone treated perlite 1.--we loose fill insulation add 1 hr to Classification. ' ,_ _ 5. Foamed Plastic'- {Optional -Not Shown) -1 -1/2 in, thick max,, 4 ft wide sheathing attached to concrete blocks (Item 1). O BPS AMERICA -Type r1 Cl (1 ) [ C- Type 1lterimax "" "' BPB CELOTEX • `Gearing the UL Classification Mark _ - - U 2 • • Design No. U905 • llho Hetptn -i2• Bearing Wall Rating -- 2 HR, 1. Concrete Blocks* •-- Classification C -3 (3 hr) and 5-4 (4 br), • Nonbearing Wall Rating - 2 lIR R,� CCrtiBc,rc web Fie Sltetl No. �+ . Mims Micas Cora " • /. - — ' - - -- , - - , . _ . Mr Mi 3 C -3 1-1/3 in, 1-1 /4in, 2 ... f � . . � . I l t. I • •o P '—�,-T'i `` ' .. , '(( j ) ., 7- Spa -•miN, 4 B-4 lin 1 -1 /tin 2 • • - _ t r '. • � — TARMAC AMERICA INC ' • 3 , 0 2- Mortar - Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8 in' thick, of not rmrironra' Section O less than 2 -1/4 and not more than 3-1/2 parts of clean sharp sand to one part Portland cement (proportioned by volume) and 15 percent • 1. Concrete Blocks"- Various designs- Classification D -2 (2 hr). hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. • See Concrete Blocks category for list of eligible manufacturers, 3. Portland Cement Stucco or Gypsum Plaster- Add 1/2 hr to dassifi- 2- Mortar --- Blocks laid in full bed of mortar; nom. 3/8 in. thick, of not cation if used. Attached to concrete blocks (Item 1). less than 2 -1/4 and not more than 34/2 parts of clean sharp sand to 1 4. Loose Masonry Fill - (Not shown) - If all core spaces are filled with part Portland cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 loose dry expanded slag, expanded clay or shale (rotary kiln process), percent hydrated lime (by cement volume)- Vertical joints staggered, water repellant vermiculite masonry fill insulation, or silicone treated 3. Portland Cement Stucco or Gypsum Plaster- Add 1/2 hr to classifi- perlite loose fill insulation, Class C -3 (3 hr) concrete blocks will provide cation if used. Where combustible members are framed in wall plaster a 4 hr fire resistance rating. or stucco must be applied on the face opposite framing to achieve a 5. Foamed Plastic• - (Optional -Not Shown) -1 -1/2 in- thick max, 4 ft max. Classification of 1-1/2 hr concrete to conete blocks (Item 1). • wide sheathing attached to concrete blocks (Item 1) or interior wall sur- 4. Loose Masonry Fill --- If all core spaces are filled wit loose dry {ace_ expanded slag, expanded clay or shale (Rotary Kiln Process), water BPB AMERICA INC repellant vermiculite masonry fill insulation, or silicone treated perlite BPB CELOTEX -Type Therrnax loose fill insulation add 2 hr to classification. 3. Foamed Plastic"- (Optional -Not Shown) - 1-1/2 in. thick max, 4 ft 'Searing the UL Classification Mark wide sheathing attached to concrete blocks (Item 1). BPB AMERICA INC BPB CELOTEX -Type Thermax 'Tearing the UL Classification Mark • 1i...... : : LOOK FOR THE UL MARK ON PRODUCT 01/03/2005 15:36 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 03/07 A' cuu rust t'(t N IS IAC DIRECTORY I FIRE RESISTANCE DIRER °' ' v ''•.�" ... .. ,. FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) ,.' ` Fire Resistance Ratings ANSI /Uj .. 0 ':: ' ; - Continue. 1 •, Eire Res istance Ratings -• ANSI /UL 263 (B 1 . %Y spaced 9 in. OC along the edges of the! • of the board. • Q T Y,, . Design No. g - 6. Joint Tape and Compound— (Not Sh Nonbearing WaII Rating z HR. joint compound, applied in two coats t' tape, 2 in_ wide, embedded in first lay t7 ,2 " Beanng the UL Classification Mark i 0* Design Na, r° l a Nonbearing Desi Wall o \ 0 NI 4 ° © •ui � p ^ - F. -. ..._ ...- - -. .__ a . ., 'i.al M.7.4' '�T .1- `4i -1 \' .a. mm t � F. 0 © © O - N',.. ,TfJ,S a,;ca<b�iv, �, - fuw,.n.,w,,,.;, ts � i ���, `,�,t, P ����I j 1�� j 1i ��s, - 1. Studs -- Channel shaped, 1 -5/8 in wide by 1-1/4 in. deep with 5/16 „ u �! in folded back return fl e le Fabricated from 20 MSG {0.0329 in -, • ..�,.W.;..,,a-,,.,�...r :;.=.,:i min metal thickness) flange legs. Max stud spacing 16 in. OC. Studs - 0 0 © . - to be cut 1 in, less than assembly height. 2. Bracing — Two j Types — Cut from steel runners or studs, cavity width. • 1- Studs — Channel shaped 3.5/8 in. wide by 1-1/4 in. deep with 5/16 Fastened with two 1/8 in. long, Type S-12, steel screws in each stud, in. folded back return flange legs- Fabricated from No- 20 MSG (0.0324 space braces max 48 in OC- in., min. bare metal thickness) galvanized steel. Max stud spacing 16 in. •"" ' . ' =ms • - - - • OC. Studs to be cut 1 in less than assembly height. ; 2_ Floor run- r and Ceiling Runners — (Not Shown) — Channel shape -� - -- - - Floo 3.518 in, wide by 1 -1 /4 in deep, p 3. Floor and Ceiling Runners — Not Shown) — Channel shaped run ners, t eep, fabricated from No- 20 MSG Hers, 1.5/8 in, wide by 1-1/4 in( deep, fabricated from 20 MSG (0.0329 (0,0329 in., min. bare metal thickness) galv steel. Attached to floor and in., min bare metal thickness) galv steel. Attached to floor and ceiling ceiling with fasteners, 24 in. OC, max. with fasteners, 3. Foamed Plastic" — (Optional) nom 1/2 in. thick rigid polystyrene 4. flti. Cemenous Barker Units " — Board 2-ar 5/8 in. thick, square insulation installed between steel studs (item 1) anMineal nd Fiber edge, attached to studs with 1 -1/4 M. long. Board (item 4), attached to studs with 1 in. long, Type S -12 steel 'Type S -12, corrosion - resistant, wafer -head steel screws, spaced 6 in. OC, screws. joints covered with lass fiber mesh tape. ,ti See Foamed Plastic (CCVW) category for names of manufachirers. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Durock Exterior Cement : 4. Cementitious Backer Units* Board 1/2 or 5/8 in thick, square Baud or Durock brand Cement Board. edge, attached to studs with 1 -1/4 in_ long, 5. Batts and Blankets° — Placed to fill interior of stud cavity. Min thick- °° Type 5-12, corrosion resistant, wafer -head steel screws, spaced 8 in. OC. ness 1.1/2 in, both stud cavities. Joints covered with glass fiber mesh tape, . THE$MAFIBER I L C —Type SApB. Board applied over Foamed Plastic (Rem 3) requires 1 -5 /8 in. long screws, 6 . Gypsum Board"— Gypsum panels 5/8 in_ thick, with beveled, square • same designation and sparing as described above. ' or tapered edges, applied vertically or horizontally. Vertical joints can- UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO — Durock Exterior Cement tared over studs. All_ staggered a min of 12 rn. from Cementitious Board or Durock Brand Cement Board. Backer Unit )Dints. . When applied vertically, secured to studs with 1 in. 5. Batts and Blankets* Placed to fill interior of stud cavity 3 in. min long Type S-12 steel screws, spaced 8 in. OC along the edges of the thick Less. board and 12 in. OC in the field of the board. When applied horizon - ness. L I C —Type SAFE. tally, secured to studs with 1 in. long Type S steel screws, spaced 8 6. Gypsum Board` — Applied vertically 5/8 in. thick, attached to studs in. OC along the of the board and 8 in, OC in the field of the _., with 1 in. long, Type S -12 screws, spaced 8 hi- OC along the edges of cavity depth to be min o 3 and SCX boards are used, stud the board and 12 in. OC in the field of the board. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Tyyes AR, C, IP -AR, CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY- -Types C, 1P -X2, IPC -AR IP -X1, lI'- X2, 1PC -AR, SCX, FRX or W1 ! CONTINENTAL GYPSUM COMPANY —Type CGS-5. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO _T G-P GYPSUM CORP, SUB Op IF-AR, 1P-Xl, IP -X2, IPC -AR, SCX or WRC. C , . F l2X FRX -G, GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORD T y p e 5. YESO I'ANAMERICANO S A DE C'lr Type C, IF-AR, IP -X1, LAFARGE GYPSUM, DI V OF 1P -X2 IPGAR SCX AR or WRC LAFARGE CORD Types LGPGC LGfC -C /A. 7. Joint Tape and Compound — Vinyl, thy or premixed joint compound, PASCO GYPSUM, DIV OF J a p pl ied m two coats to joints and screw heads; paper tape 2 in. wide PACIFIC COAST BU[LD /NG PRODUCTS INC —Type C. / embe in first layer o compound over a joints As ao UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO—Types C, IP-X2, 1PC-AR YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V —Types C, IP-X2, IPC- . - • ` - : • d - • - -'- - - - - : ' - - - " Joints reinforced. . AR. 8. Joints— Treated with glass fiber tape and latex modified Portland 7. Joint Tape and Compound— Vinyl, cement, mortar or ANSI A136.1 type 1 organic adhesive. applied in two coats to joints and screw heads; premixed tpe, 2 in compound, wearing the UL Classification Mark embedded in first layer of compound over all joints. As an alternate, nominal 3/32 in, thick gypsum veneer plaster may be applied to the entire surface of Classified veneer baseboard. Joints reinforced. Design N 0. ng — 8. Joints — Treated with glass fiber tape and latex modified Portland Nonbearing Wall Rating -- 2 Flt cement mortar or ANSI A136.1 type 1 organic adhesive. 0 per M � ' 0 I 1 m8 Material— (Optional — � p 1D. Shown) - � As required. �II�+ili ryanli��fl ' Not : 9. Vapor Permeable Water Barrier Sheath Water Barrier— (Optional Not Shown) — Commercial asphalt sate- - 1 f aa9146?IT'�.i�j{ 04� !( - rated and /or coated felt. +''t • 'Bearing the UL Classification Mark - I-4611.1.4 side ' .,,:o.. • CF.ILIN© HORZ. SECTION lii. 0 T O FLOOR 1. Moor and Ceiling Runners -- "J" shaped, 2 - 1/2 in. wide with unequal tc LOOK FOR THE UL MARK ON PRODUCT 01/03/2005 15:36 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 04/07 2001 FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY , • . FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) P. Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI /UL 263 (SXTJV Cortfirrued Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI /UL " ` • rs r.._ :.. era) support of studs, support may be provided by means of steel end joint and 12 in. O.C, vertically, Board v straps, cktannels or other similar means as specified in the design of a board side joints all screws shall be locate particular steel stud wall system. layer also secured to the second and third 4. Batts and Blankets"— (Optional) — When used 1, 1 -1 /2, 2 or 3 in. G, self - tapping steel screws located midw thick mineral wool batts supplied in 24 in. widths, placed to fill interior the horizontal joint, Joints in each layer of of wall_ the joints in the adjacent layer and on of • See Batts and Blankets (BZXX) category for names of manufacturers. For 3 Hr Rating Three layers of wallba 5. Gypsum Board — 1/2 in. thick, 4 ft. wide. Four layers of wallboard to be applied vertically with joints centered ' • be used. Inner layers to be applied vertically with joints centered over be applied vertically or horizontally. Firs r• - :: studs. Outer layer may be applied vertically or horizontally. first layer with 1 in. long, Type Si self - tapping steel fastened to each stud with 1 in. lop Type 5, self- tapping. steel screw_ to each stud through the first layer with' . Second layer fastened to each stud through the first layer with 1 -5/8 in. tap steel screws, Third layer fastenei long, Type S, self- tapping steel screws. Third layer fastened to each and second layers with 21/4 in. long - 1 - ') 4• stud through die fast and second layers with 2-1/4 in. long, Type 5, First and second layer screws shall be lo, self-tapping steel screws. Fourth layer fastened to each steel throw bottom of wall, respectively, with a maxi lf the first, Y through vertically. The third layer screws shall be manta h in. rruu% to a„u first, second and third layers with 2 -5/8 in long, Type S, self - bottom of wall with a maximum spacing of 12 in. O,C, vertically. Each tapping steel screws. First, second and third layer screws shall be third layer horizontal board end shall be centered over and secured to rte, installed with a maximum spadess of 48 in. O.0 vertically. Fourth layer the stud with Type S, self•tapping steel screws spaced 1/2 in. from end vertically installed wallboard attached with screws spaced 12 in, over n joint and 12 in. O.C. vertically, Third layer, also secured to the first and vertically_ Fourth layer horizontal board end shall be centered or and the second layers with 1 -1 /2 in. long, Type G, Self-tapping steel screws secured to the stud with screws spaced 1/2 in, from end joint and 12 located midway between studs and 1 in- from the horizontal joint. u' in. O.C. vertically. Board end joints shall be staggered. At board side Board end joints shall be staggered. Vertical board joints to be stag - joints all screws shall be located 1/2 in. from the longitudinal joints. joints in the g a n ]] Horizontal applied fourth layer also secured to the second and third d from the ] adjacent layer and on opposite sides of �' layers with 1 /2 in. long, Type C, self-tapping steel screws located studs - BPB AMERICA INC midway between studs and 1 in. from the longitudinal joint. Joints in BPB CBLOf16X —Type F12I? each layer of wallboard to be staggered from the joints in the adjacent 5. joint Tape and Compound (Not Shown) — Vinyl or casein, dry or • layer and on opposite sides of studs, premixed joint compound applied in two coats to joints and screw ii_ BPB AMERICA INC heads. Paper tape, 2 in. wide, embedded in first layer of compound BPB CELOTEX —Type FRP, over all pmts. - "Bearing the UL Classification Mark *Bearing the UI. Classification Mark " Design No. U463 aJ � besign N >GJ465 Nonbearing Wall Rating — 3 or 4 HR (See Item 4) (, Nonbearing Wall Rating 7 HR. O € 0 . , 3 .r v; t;&,'..., m vd Emma HOR17. SECTION • �,©'f ` p. - - � • . '0 \ \ \ Ilili;ill © p:CEILING,A . 1. Floor and Ceiling Runners — (not shown) — Channel shaped run- O�� i in, IIII ta , ners, 3.5/8 in. wide (min), 1 -1 /4 in. legs, frmed from min No. 25 MSG (min No. 20 MSG when item 4C is used) galv steel, attached to floor and ceiling with fasteners s spaced 24 in, OC ma . . FLOOR .; e��� 2. Steel Studs— Channel shaped, 3-5/8 in. wide (min), 1-1 in. legs, •, 3/8 in- folded back returns, formed from min No. 25 MSG (min No. 20 t•. 1. Studs — - Channel- shaped, 1 -5/8 in. wide by 1 1/4 in, deep, with MSG when Item 4C is used) gals steel spaced 24 in. OC max. • 5. 5/16 in. folded back return flange legs. Fabricated from No. 25 MSG 3. Batts and Blankets* — (Optional) — Mineral wool or glass fiber bats galv steel. Stud spacing 16 or 24 in. OC. Studs to be cut 1 in. less than partiall or completely filling stud cavity. . • assembly height. . ' bee Batts and Blankets (BZJZ) category for names of Cl'assied companies. "'- 2. Floor and Ceiling Runners — - Channel - shaped runners, 1-5/8 in 4. Gypsum *Board" 5/8 in. thick, 4 ft Wide, attached to steel studs and wide by 1 -1/4 in. deep, fabricated from No. 25 MSG gale steel. floor and ceiling track with 1 in. long, Type S steel screws spaced 8 in. Attached to floor and ceiling with fasteners spaced 24 in. OC. max. OC. along edges of board and 12 in. OC "m the field of the board. Joints 3_ Batts and Blankets' — - (optional) - Nominal 1-1/2 in. thick, placed oriented vertically and sta on opposite sides of the assembly. in interior of wall cavity. • • • ; • - - ,.. , . • • , .. -,,... • .... - See Batts and Blankets (BZXX) category for names of manufacturers. ^ _ 4. Gypsum Board* — 1/2 in. thick, 4 ft wide with square or tapered -0G edges, AMERICAN GYPSUM CO —Type AG-C. • For 4 Hr Rating - Four layers of wallboard to be used. Inner layers to be BEIJING NEW BUILDING MATERIALS CO LTD —Type applied vertically with joints centered over studs. Outer layer may be • DBX -1. • • • applied vertically or horizontally. First layer fastened to each stud with I BPB AMERICA INC in. long Type S, self - tapping steel screws. Second layer fastened to each BPB CELOTEX Type 1. stud through the first layer with 1 -5/8 in, long, Type S, self- tapping steel CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Types AR, C, IP -AR screws. Third layer fastened. to each stud through the first and second 1P41, IPC -A , SCX, SHX, WRC or WRX. ' layers with 2.1/4 in..long, Type S, self - tapping steel screws. Fourth layer CONTINENTAL GYPSUM COMPANY - --Types CG-C, CG5-5, fastened to each stud through the first, second and third layers with 2-5/8 CG6-6, CG9 -9, CGTC -C. in. long, Type S, self - tapping steel screws - First layer screws shall be G-P GYPSUM CORP, SUS OF located 5 in. from top and bottom of wall with a maximum spadng of 48 GEORGIA - PACIFIC CORP —Types 5, 4, C, DGG, DS, GPFS6. • in. O.C. vertically between top and bottom screws. Second and third layer JAMES HARDIE GYPSUM INC —Type Max "C' or Fire X. `.t screws shall be located 4 and in., respectively, from the top and bottom LAFARGE GYPSUM, DIV OF �•• of wall with the same vertical spacing as the first layer screws. Fourth LAFARGE CORP —Types LGFC2, LGFC2A, LGFC6, LGFC6A,. " layer screws shall be located 2 in. from top and bottom of wall and spaced LGFC -C, LGFC -C /A. 12 in. O.C. vertically. Each fourth layer horizontal board end shall be NATIONAL GYPSUM CO —Types FSK -C, FSXC -G, PSW -C, `= centered over and secured to the stud with screws spaced 1/2 in. from FSW-G, FSW . sn LOOK FOR THE UL M • RK ON PRODUCT 01/03/2005 15:36 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 05/07 TCg FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) • C FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXAFI) ire Resistance Ratings ANSI /1 Ji, 263 (SXU nntinued Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI /UL 263 (BXUV)— Continued • PABCO GYPSUM, DIV O1F V '(J s".... JAMES HARDIE GYPSUM INC —Type Max"C" . • PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS IN T e PG-C. LAFARGE GYPSUM, DIV OF ltIEPLTBLIC GYPSUM CO Type RG -C /3 4Ft�✓ LAFARGE CORP —Types LGFC -C, LGFC -C /A. SIAM GYPSUM INDUSTRY CO LTD Type EX -1 NATIONAL GYPSUM CO Type FR or WA. STANDARD GYPSUM L L C —Type SG -C, PASCO GYPSUM, DIV OP TEMPLE- INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS CORP —Type TG-C. PACIFIC COAST BUXLDING PRODUCTS INC —Type C or UNITED STATES GYPSUM Co Type AR, C, FRX-G, IP -AR, PG-C. IP -X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SH-IX WRC or WRX. REPUBLIC GYPSUM CO—Type RG-C. YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V —Type AR, C, IP -AR, SIAM GYPSUM INDUSTRY CO LTD —Type EX -1 IP -X2, IPC -Ali, SCX, $1 WRC or WRX. • ARD T STAND GYPSUM L L C e SG-C. WESTROC INC Type Westroc Fireboard- TEMPLE- INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS CORP —Type TG -C • ... , ' UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type AR, C, FRX -G, IP -AR, WRC 1P-Xl, IP -X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SIC, or WRX. -- 1.1 4 YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V —T ype AR, C, IP -AR, CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Types AR IF-AR. IP -Xl, IP -X2, IPC -AR SCX..SHX, WRC or WRX. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Types AR, IP•AR. 5A. Gypsum Board " — (As an alternate to Item 5) — Nom 3/4 in. thick, YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V Tres AR, IP -AR installed as described in Item 5 with screw length increased to 1 -1/4 in. .. . y .. for base layer and 2-1/4 in. for face layer. , , r - - .. _ : . - CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY Types AR, 2-AR r.. - .., ",. • •• - UNfl'E) STATES GYPSUM CO Types AR, IP - AR .• - - Item 4.--. Y ; . YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C'(r —Types AR, IP -AR. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Type FRX. 5B. Gypsum Board * — (As an alternate to Item 4 and 5A) — 5/8 in. thick UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type FRX. gypsum panels, installed as described in Item 5 with Type 5-12 steel 5. Joint Tape and Compound — Vinyl, dry or premixed joint compound. . screws. The Length and spacing of the screws as specified under Item 5. applied m two coats to joints and screw heads; paper tape, 2 in. wide, , CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Type FRX. embedded in first layer of compound over all joints. As an alternate, • UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type FRX. nominal 3/32 in. thick gypsum veneer plaster may be applied to the 5C. Gypsum Board*— (As an alternate to Items 5, 5A and 5B) - 5/8 ire entire surface of Classified veneer baseboard. Joints reinforced. thine, 2 ft wide, tongue and groove edge, applied horizontally to one • ,- : • �..:.. -.. _. ,.. — , ,: i .y side of the assembly (as the outer layer on the two layer side). Secured as described in Item 5. Joint covering (Item 6) not required. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY — Type SHX. • UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type HX. Bearing the UL Classification Mar YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V— Type SHX. 6. joint Tape and Compound- Vinyl, dry or premixed joint compound, — applied in two coats to joints and screw heads; paper tape, 2 in. wide, Design No. U466 embedded in first layer of compound over all joints, As an alternate, Nonbearing Wall Rating —• 1 HR. nominal 3/.32 in. thick gypsum veneer plaster may be applied to the entire surface of classified veneer base board. Joints reinforced. 0 © © 0 7. Caulking and Sealants` — (Optional, not shown) — A bead of acous- i Al tical sealant applied around the partition perimeter for sound control. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO—Type AS. s+:.1 .x¢s 'Bearing the UL Classification Mark ililiMINifilliff � I M Design No. U467 . ..111111WAr. IA Nonbearing Wall Rating — 2 HR. 0 € { 24 ' i 0 • . O 0 0 ; N 1'Ji�SF:fY.' S1 4r.Tr Y 27 1 6sisst :eta' 2IDa'Litial :ld mf�.V ';; • L Floor and Ceiling Runner — (not shown) — Channel-shaped runners, � � 9 � u ` l I MSG �ti � r_... .nc..._ ..� Y . r •�• �:�er_� �•c ' Y . 1 - 5/8 in. wide by 1 in. deep fabricated from 25 MSG (20 G when �- Item 5B is used) galv steel. Attached to floor and ceiling with fasteners, O • 24 in.00,max CEILINSI NOII SECTION 'j g 2. Studs — Channel shaped, 1 in wide by 1.1/4 M. des with 1/4 -50. ' G) I f O in. folded back return flange legs. Fabricated from 25 MSG (20 MSG ', 0 f� u ' O when Item 5B is used) gale steel. Max stud spacing 24 in. OC. • © a ffil 3. Bracing — Two Types — Cut from steel runners or studs, cavity width. p i Ili V yt ;,,;r, r , Fastened with two 1/2. in. long, Type S steel screws in each stud, space flout braces max 48 in. OC. As an alternate bracing cut from gypsum wall- board, length equal to stud cavity width ancf6 in. wide. - Fasten with 1. Floor and. Ceiling Runners — "J" shaped, 2.1/2 M. wide with unequal two 1 in. long, Type S steel screws 1 -1 /4 in. long if Item 5A is used) in • legs of 1 in and 2 in., fabricated from 24 MSG (20 MSG when Item 48 • each stud, space braces max 48 in. OC. is used) galv steel. Runners attached to structural supports with steel 4. Batts and Blankets*— (Optional) Mineral wool or glass fiber batts, fasteners located not greater than 2 in. from ends and not greater than • partially or completely filling stud cavity. See Batts and Blankets (BZJZ) 24 in. OC • category for names of manufacturers. - 2. Steel Studs— "C -H" shaped studs, 2- 1 /2•in- wide by 1 -1/2 in. deep, 5. Gypsum Board' — 5/8 in. thick. Screw attached, single layer side with fabricated from 25 MSG (20 MSG when Item 413 is used) gals steel • 1 in. long. Type S steel screws spaced 12 in. OC. Wallboard on double spaced 24 in. OC. Vertically restrained walls require studs to be cut 3/8 layer side, base layer attached with 1 in. long, Type S steel screws • ire less than floor to ceiling height. spaced 24 in. OC, face layer attached with 1=5/8 in long, Type S steel 3. Gypsum Board' --• 1 in thick gypsum wallboard liner panels, sup - screws spaced 12 in. OC- Wallboard joints oriented vertical or horizon- plied in nominal 24 in widths. Vertical edges inserted in "H" shaped _ tel, with or without offset. Butt joints located over studs. section of "C -H" studs. Free edge of end panels attached to, long let of AMERICAN GYPSUM CO —Tyyppe AG -C. • 7 runners with 1 -5/8 in. long Type $ steel screws spaced not greater - BEIJING NEW BUILDING MA'PBRIALS CO LTD — Type tan 12 in. OC. DBX -1. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY Type SLX. • CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Types AR, C, IP -AR, UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO — Type SLX. • • IP -X1, XP -X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SHX, WRC or WRX. YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C •Q —Type SLX. _ CONTINENTAL GYPSUM COMPANY —Types CG-C, CG5 -5, 4. Gypsum Board"— 1/2 in. or 5/8 in. 4 ft wide applied vertically and • CGTC-C. attached to studs and runners with .1 in. long Type S steel screws . G-P GYPSUM COIZP, SUB OF • spaced 12 in. OC. . GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORP —Types 5, C. AMERICAN GYPSUM CO ---Type AG-C. LOOK FOR THE UL MARK ON PRODUCT 01/03/2005 15:36 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 01/07 MEMORANDUM .1. EEA ARCHITECTS P.C. 1230 5W FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 300 I „,f PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 -3236 •.,,, , 503.223.6963 / FAX 503.294.0827 TO: Val Henzel January 3, 2005 Building Department - City of Tigard . 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 • cc: Rick Rainone, Craig Markus Site FROM: EEA . ® FAXED, #PAGES / FAX NO.: (503) 598 1960 ❑ MAILED [j MESSENGERED SUBJECT: Preliminary Review 02 Response Permit Number: BUP2004 -00910 In response to the City of Tigard memo dated 01/03/04, the following are the responses to each item. 1. DRAFT STOPS: OSSC 708.3.1.2.2 exception requires a draft stop every 100' or 9,000 s.f. of attic or concealed overhang. The exception was satisfied via the "alternative understanding letter" by providing sprinkler heads into concealed spaces as shown in the specifications (15300, 1.03,F,3). There are no concealed overhangs on the project., Sheets A9.2W and A9.2E show general note 28 with a dashed line poche on stud walls that extend up to the roof metal decking. These poche walls are typically surrounding each classroom that are not masonry walls going to roof metal decking. Therefore, each classroom (and Activity space) has a "Draft Stop ". The library has a soffit wall on grid N allowing the library attic to be less than 9,000 s.f. and 100' east -west The Administration area between Grids 3 and 6 as well as Grids A and J are also split lip by the general note 28 to be much less than even 3,000 s.f. or 60' in any direction. The Gym and Multipurpose have no attics since they are exposed structure. The Kitchen is less than even 3,000 s.f. due to the occupancy'separation from the Music room attic. The main entry and corridors are split up to be less than 9,000 s.f. or 100' in any direction via grids 3, 6, 7, 10, 12. There is also a draft stop around the Stage Attic, making the area between grids 7 and 12 as well as grids H and L less than even 3,000 s.f. 2. UL ASSEMBLIES DETAILS: UL listings are on sheets A3.2S and A3.1S for each wall type. See attached UL cut sheets showing which variations are used. 3. BOILER ROOM LOCATION AND DETAILS: The Boiler Room E205 is located on the'main floor plan, on sheet A3.2W, grid 8 between grids H and J. Wall types shown at this location in the documents show wall type 1A which lists UL #: U465. Ceiling is 1 -hour rated per A1..1 legend at bottom center of sheet referencing detail 2/A5.5, Page 1 of 1 • • A k�!IV1'�IIf \ December 27, 2004 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Greg Weiler 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: BUP2004 -00529 Construction Type: II - 1HR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E -1, A2.1, B, S1 Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -01) 1999 edition. The following information is required in order to complete the review. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 1. Provide clarification on court yard/play area exiting where kindergarten and corridor exits. OSSC 1006.3.5, 1007.3.11 2. Provide clarification on occupant load and exiting from computer room with library occupants using this room as intervening room_for exiting. OSSC 1007.3.4, 1003.3.1.5 & Table 10 -A 3. Provide clarification on storage room under stairs is sprinkled. OSSC 904.2.4.3, 1003.3.3.9, 4. Provide clarification on East covered play area exiting where corridor exits. OSSC 1006.3.5, 1007.3.11 5. Provide clarification on glazing for fire restive system used for windows in the corridor. OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2.2, 713.8 & 9 6. Provide clarification on intervening room smoke detection system. OSSC 1007.3.4 7. Provide clarification on means of egress identification areas. OSSC 1003.2.8 & 1109.15 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 8. Provide clarification on why corridors walls at play area exits are not 1 hour rated as required per OSSC 1004.3.4.3. 1005.3.1 (Opening are exempt per OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2 and Table 5 -A.) 9. Provide listed fire restive construction assemblies. 10. Provide masonry veneer design. 11. Provide clarification on manufacturer's information on walk -in cooler /freezer showing approved by the State of Oregon. Oregon Administrative Rule 918 -674 MECHANICAL 12. Review not included with this permit. Please provide an item by item response. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Truss Joist Shop Drawings, etc, will be charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the portion of the work being deferred. The minimum fee shall be $200.00. Deferred items; • Fire Alarms • Fire Sprinklers When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectfully, / Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner Barbara Butler - Alberta Rider Elementary — – _ Page 1] From: Susan Ross To: Comm Notification Date: 5/17/2005 3:34:53 PM Subject: Alberta Rider Elementary CUP 2003 - 00012, Alberta Rider Elementary School, has been released for BUP. There is a case note in the file as such. YeeeHaaaw! Sue Ross, Permit Coordinator Community Development Department City of Tigard, Oregon 503 - 718 -2453 susanr @ci.tigard.or.us 4 02/15/2005 14:29 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 07/08 March 16, 2004 Brian Blalock City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY - ALTERNATIVE UNDERSTANDING The purpose of this letter is to formalize the alternative understanding for the items below per UBC 104.2.8 "Alternate materials, alternate design and methods of construction". The design will incorporate the items below of "beyond code" in exchange for "Items of exception" in order to improve the overall safety of the building inhabitants. "Beyond code" items are as follows; 1. ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS: Sprinklers are at light duty, but are above and below the ceilings at each standard location. 2. ADDITIONAL SMOKE DETECTORS: Smoke Detectors are full area detection, but not in attic. 3. FIRE TRUCK ACCESS: Fire truck access is to the S.E. corner of the building, and the S.W. corner of the building. There is adequate space to maneuver the fire trucks. 4. BUILDING YARD SEPARATION: 60' separation around the building is maintained as a minimum. 5. ROOF SLIP SHEET: 1 -hr slip sheet is on top of the roof metal deck. 6. • EXITING: Exiting is above and beyond what is required for travel distances and corridor ratings. 7. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Type V is required, Type II is integrated. • 1 oft • 02/15/2005 14:29 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 08/08 "Items of exception" are as follows: • 1. AREA SEPARATION WALLS: 904.2.4.2 states all El occupancies must have less than 20,000 s_f. actual area or be sprinklered. Area separation walls would be required in order to not use sprinkler credit. Sprinkler credit needs to be used for substitution of 1 -hr construction to allow 2 stories. Both EEA and the City agree that the integrity of the Area Separation Walls become deteriorated over time and during construction due to the amount of penetrations required in a building of this type. It is further agreed that additional sprinklers and non - combustible construction create more reliable safety conditions. Therefore no area separation walls are included, however Type 11 and additional sprinklers are integrated. 2. ROOF CONSTRUCTION: For asphalt shingle roofing, OSB or Plywood is required for warranty on pull -out strength of fasteners. Due to Type II construction, we are using fire treated plywood immediately below the 3 -tab asphalt roofing shingles, and a 1 -hour slip sheet that is immediately on top of the metal decking. 3. OCCUPANCY RATIO: The occupancy ratio is 5% over what is allowed per UBC. One reason it is agreed this trade -off is acceptable is the precedents of other schools in the District. Another reason is that putting out fires immediately with a sprinkler system, reducing the amount of combustible material in the building, making shorter travel distances, and giving early warning are all more desirable than containing fires with Area Separation Walls. It is understood by both EEA and the City that only the items above are locked in as being acceptable to the parties signed below for the final occupancy of this building. Brian Blalock Gary XXXXX Richard Eslick Plans Examiner Plans Examiner Architect Date Date Date • 2 of 2 • Susan Ross - Rider School Annexation Page 1 , From: Craig Prosser To: Jim Hendryx Date: 05/12/2005 11:24:03 AM Subject: Rider School Annexation I just hear from Jer Pratton at the school district. The annexation petition is not submitted yet. They had it ready to go last week and then discovered that due to land trades and dedications they have done, the metes and bounds were no longer accurate. They worked with their attorney to correct those. He said that it should be turned in tomorrow or Monday. Craig Prosser Interim City Manager City of Tigard 503 - 718 -2486 503 - 639 -1471 fax craig @ci.tigard.or.us CC: Barbara Shields; Susan Ross k � #( 22 f q ' ` Tigard - Tualatin School District 23J /Q ecuo Larry Hibbard Administration Center ni V IL ip 6960 SW Sandburg Street 1 0 � Tigard, Oregon 97223 ZOO 503 - 431 -4000 • fax 503-431 -4047 J www.ttsd.k12.or.us May 4, 2005 James Hendrix City of Ti 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Alberta Rider Elementary School Dear Jim, This letter is a follow -up to your letter received April 21, 2005 and our subsequent meeting on April 28 The status of the fourteen (14) conditions needed for issue of the building permit for the fire /life safety portion of the building are shown below. Item City No. Description Status Action 1 2 Final tree removal plan Submitted & approved, Copy of approved plan 11/04 delivered to City on 5/2/05 (Sue Ross) COMPLETE 2 4 Notify City Arborist of S. Poage sent letter to Sue Ross will notify status City 11/04. Additional arborist copy of plan submitted COMPLETE 5/2/05 3 8 Dedication deed for 37 Recorded with the Copy of deed submitted ft. on Bull Mt. Rd. county for Sue Ross on 5/2/05 City needs copy of COMPLETE recorded dedication deed 4 10 Plans must show See sheet 8 of 14 of COMPLETE bicycle striping, approved drawings markers, arrows, etc. 5 13 Revise plans to show Unresolved District plans to appeal one driveway for life access spacing standard. estate as conditioned. INCOMPLETE 6 14 Plans to show The emergency access This item will remain emergency access at not required with the open until 132 " PFI NE corner of site to construction of 132n conditions are met. bull Mt. Rd. Terrace ( "F" St.) COMPLETE Item City No. Description Status Action 7 17 Provide sanitary and Details on C4.2 thru Permit issues to arbor storm sewer details on C4.5 plans. calcs and homes. the PFI permit plans. topo provided and plans COMPLETE Provide calculations approved and topo map to supplement. 8 29 Provide sight distance Considered non- S. Poage to follow -up certification for applicable by District with traffic engineer. intersections and designer at time of INCOMPLETE driveways. submission. 9 37 Pay address fee Statement for City COMPLETE shows paid 10 32 Provide final lighting Shown on drawings. 5/2/05 and copy of E2.0, plan showing lighting E2.0PH, E2.0EG of oathways.on site. drawings given to Sue , Include'photomatic Ross. data. COMPLETE 11 33 Screening for areas Shown on drawings Copy (9 sheets) of abutting residential drawings given to Sue properties. Ross on 5/2/05 COMPLETE 13 35 Satisfy requirements of Sue Ross to provide S. Poage to confirm the Washington Co. Land copy of the letters to requirements have been Use and Transportation School District. met. letters dated 5/25/04 Designer says all are INCOMPLETE and 6/3/04. integrated on drawings A2.0, E2.0, civil and landscape drawings. 14 38 Pay standard water District has paid to COMPLETE quality fee. CWS. Thank you for your consideration of these items. Please call me if questions arise. Sincerely, // / f Stephen Poage Director of Capital Projects c: Jer Pratton Craig Prosser Craig Markus r Ai r aura • CITY OF TIGARD FACT SHEET 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Contact: Sue Ross, (503) 718 -2453 DATE: April 28, 2005 TOPIC: Alberta Rider Elementary School Project PURPOSE: A meeting to review the remaining conditions of approval for CUP2003- 00012 in an attempt to resolve them and move forward with the permit issuance and construction of the school. PRESENT: Stephen Poage, TTSD; Jim Hendryx, Kim McMillan, Gary Lampella, Sue Ross, City of Tigard. Once the meeting began at 9:00 a.m., the following conditions of approval were reviewed and discussed. The result of discussion is listing under each applicable condition. THE FOLLOWING PLANNING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OFA SITE PERMIT: 2. The applicant shall submit a final tree removal and protection plan that identifies the trees to be removed and the trees to be protected. Mitigation will then be based on the final tabulation of trees removed to those retained, per Section 18.790.030. Result: This plan was on the construction plans submitted to Building Department last November. A separate plan showing the tree removal and protection plan needs to be submitted to the Planning Department to meet this condition. • 4. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. Result: A letter was sent regarding the erosion control and tree protection plan in place. Sue will notify Matt Stine to please site inspect and report to sign off this condition. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SITE PERMIT: 8. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of Bull Mountain Road to increase the right -of -way to 37 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right -of -way centerline. The dedication document shall be on city forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Result: Stephen Poage stated that Craig Markus was working on this Bull Mountain Road right -of -way. A copy of the right -of -way with the county recordation number needs to be submitted to Kim. 10. The applicant's plans shall show installation of bicycle striping, markers, legends and mini - arrows along the Bull Mountain Road frontage. Result: Kim will verify plan details. 13. The applicant's plan shall show the east Rider driveway eliminated. Result: Stephen Poage stated that Mrs. Rider is not comfortable with the elimination of her driveway. Kim offered to meet with her to come up with some alternatives. Stephen will contact Ed Murphy to either design an acceptable alternative or make a case for an adjustment. Access Spacing Standard, refer to code chapter 187.05 14. The applicant's plans shall show the proposed access onto Bull Mountain Road as an emergency only access. That access shall be gated or otherwise improved to prevent general public motor vehicle access, but shall be accessible to emergency services providers, pedestrians and bicyclists. The access may be used for general public motor vehicle access only during an emergency or when otherwise approved for that purpose by the Planning Manager. Case Note: No emergency access proposed. Result: Once the construction easements and right -of -way copies are submitted to the city (Kim McMillan), the PFI permit for 132nd can be issued and this condition signed off. The construction and acceptance of 132nd will eliminate the need for Bull Mountain Road (emergency) access. 17. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the Public Facility Improvement permit plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. Result: This condition is tied to 132nd and Batterson Road. Kim will verify information in the 132 package. 29. The applicant shall submit preliminary sight distance certification for all driveways and intersections related to this development. Included with the preliminary certification shall be a detailed list of improvements required to produce adequate sight distance. Result: Kittleson is preparing certification. 37. Prior to submittal of permits, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee according to the rate at the time of payment. Contact Shirley Treat, Engineering. Result: This fee has been paid. Sue will sign off condition. THE FOLLOWING PLANNING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 32. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a final lighting plan that indicates the lighting levels for the pathways on site. Ensure that all lighting on site will not cause glare (measured as 1 foot candle at the property line) to adjacent properties.. This plan shall also address glare onto abutting properties from outdoor field lighting, if applicable. Lights shall be generally oriented towards the school building and not toward the abutting properties. The lighting plan shall include photometric data to demonstrate compliance with the requirement. 33. Screening shall be provided on all sides of the project that abut residential property. This requirement may be waived for those properties where the applicant has secured written authorization from these abutting property owners to forgo this screening. 34. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan that shows: A. Street trees along both sides of West Access Road and one side of SW Bull Mountain Road, and the F Street cul -de -sac (or the eastside of an extended F Street). Species selection shall be as recommended by the City Forester and planted at the required spacing. Such trees shall be installed prior to final building inspection. 'r B. Additional screening (vegetation or a sigh obscuring fence) along the western edge of the bus loading area and the eastern edge of the parking area. C. Dimensions of the landscape islands to demonstrate that tree planting areas have a minimum three feet of width. Result: Conditions 32, 33, and 34 will have plans (Westlake ?) forwarded to Planning (Morgan Tracy) to meet these requirements. 35. The applicant shall satisfy the requirements of Section I of Washington County's Land Use and Transportation Department's letters dated June 3 and May 25, 2004, and provide written confirmation from the country that their requirements have been satisfied. Result: After the streets are built, assure Washington County approval and submit copy of such approval to Kim McMillan. Sue will get copies of letters referenced in previous mail and submit to Stephen Poage. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: • 38. During issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall pay the standard water quantity fee (fee amounts will be the latest approved by CWS). Result: CWS Permit indicates payment. Sue will sign -off this condition. All agreed that the timeframe is very important at this point for completion and sign -off of these conditions and may be accomplished within a week or so. Should you have any additions, deletions or discrepancies to these notes, please notify Sue Ross as soon as possible. Thank you. April 19, 2005 Steve Poage Director of Capital Projects ',; Tigard- Tualatin School District AE® 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: This letter serves to review fees and Conditions of Approval that are outstanding for the Alberta Rider Elementary School Project. I am attaching a current listing of fees outstanding, along with remaining Conditions of Approval. The building permit for fire /life safety portion of the building has been ready to issue since March 18. However, as you can see by the attached Conditions of Approval, there are still 14 conditions that need to be met prior to issuance of further permits. It is important to state that you were permitted to proceed with construction with the understanding that your conditions would be met as soon as practical. Several months have gone by without progress toward meeting all of the applicable conditions. The city has cooperated to the fullest extent to allow your contractor to go forward with certain aspects of construction on the site. An extensive amount of construction has proceeded ahead of normal permit sequence and in some cases without permit. We are coming to a point that the public facilities plans must be completed. This requires submission of all construction and permanent easements and right of way dedications. We want to see the project continue forward and not be delayed. We had been holding successful weekly meetings for project status and I encourage your participation to attend a meeting I have scheduled for Tuesday, May 10 at 2 :00 p.m. to review where we are at with the project. The City will notify via email all those who previously attended with the same invitation. Steve, I have always strived to ensure good communications throughout the project. However, I was disappointed to see the article in the Oregonian stating that the school opening is "delayed by a dispute with the city over a nearby road and permit problems ". I am sorry that the School Board members were informed that was the case as we know . the problems with securing permits are more complicated than merely stating the City has held the project up. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director • cc: Alberta Rider Project Team Members 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 December 29, 2004 £Pzgv @�� Steve Poage — ma Tigard - Tualatin School District CITY OF TI 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street ®G® Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: A critical situation has been brought to my attention today that has the potential to compromise the continued construction at Alberta Rider Elementary School. I was notified that plans for the private sewer line have never been submitted to Clean Water Services (CWS) for the Alberta Rider project. There are two crucial services that CWS must conduct. One, they must review and approve the plans to issue permits for the sewer lateral connection from the school to the public sewer in Summit Ridge. They must also review and approve plans for the storm and sewer lines to be constructed in the public streets (132 and Batterson Street). These plans are currently under review by CWS. • As you recognize, the city has cooperated to the fullest extent to allow your contractor to go forward with certain aspects of construction on the site. Extensive site work, footings and retaining walls have been allowed to proceed ahead of normal permit sequence. We are coming to a point that the public facilities plans must be completed. This requires submission of all construction and permanent easements and right of way dedications. In addition, without the proper permits from CWS, we cannot issue plumbing permits or continue to allow further construction activities beyond what has been permitted above (ie foundations, etc.). We want to see the project continue forward and not stop. We continue to meet weekly and I encourage your participation to ensure good communications continue throughout the project. I will continue to provide notes from the meetings to keep you informed of the progress being made. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James N.P. endryx, Community Development Director cc: Alberta Rider Project Team Members 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 - 4171 TDD (503) 684 - 2772 //invoulli�uP '�P , December 10, 2004 a " CITY OF Ti t''u OREGON Steve Poage Tigard - Tualatin School District 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: A meeting was held Wednesday, December 8, 2004 between representatives of Cornerstone, Robinson Construction, and the City regarding Alberta Rider Elementary School. The purpose was to clear up some questions and frustrations and to help establish a foundation for clear communication and cooperation between our entities to make this upcoming construction process a positive project. The meeting was progressive and we agreed to meeting weekly for the time being to keep that line of communication open. Daily activity with the project will be logged and then a weekly update written and copied to the interested parties. Attached is this week's update. You will continue to receive copies of the update from our Permit Coordinator, Sue Ross. Sue will be the main contact for any questions, concerns, and submittals to the city. She will either process or distribute necessary documentation to Engineering or Planning during the land use process while conditions continue to be met. Sue's direct telephone number is 503- 718 -2453. Regarding your inquiry of the actual Parks Systems Development Fee, the fee is based upon the number of employees that will be employed at Alberta Rider. Rick Rainone stated 40 employees, so the fee will be calculated on that figure. Currently, the fee is $131.00 per employee x 40 equaling $5,240.00. The City Council has an agenda item this month for a significant increase in Parks SDC's. The increase is proposed to be higher than the normal end of the year increase. I recognize that it is prior to annexation, but I do encourage the School District to pay the Parks SDC prior to final occupancy as the increase will go into effect January 1, 2005. In the matter of the Hold Harmless agreement we are requiring before work progresses, I am attaching a sample format for the School District to follow, personalizing the form to fit the needs of the project. It is imperative that we receive this Hold Harmless agreement at the earliest convenience. Feel free to have your legal counsel contact Gary Firestone at 503 - 306 -0258 concerning the 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 r A• project or the language of the Hold Harmless agreement, and do not hesitate to contact me with any questions during this project as we look forward to a positive and successful school development. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director attachments cc: Alberta Rider Project Team Members MEMORANDUM Atog 111V\ lusfil TO: Jim Hendryx Kim McMillan Brian Blalock Mike White Morgan Tracy FROM: Sue Ross, Permit Coordinator DATE: December 8, 2004 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY UPDATE As the conditions of approval show, there are quite a few outstanding items to be completed for this project prior to site permit issuance, PFI issuance and any construction. During a meeting held Thursday, November 04, 2004, some of the following items were agreed upon concerning Alberta Rider Elementary School: • The address fee for the project has been transferred and an address assigned to the school site: 14850 S.W. 132 Terrace. • Now that the address is assigned, plans and permit applications in my area will be submitted to the Building Division to go into the plan review queue. • Although the submitted permits (Building - related permits and PFI permit) will go through the plan review process until approval is reached, the school has been given approval to go ahead with some limited site work, to include • preparation of site prior to site permit issuance • rock the access road(s) and approximately 50 -feet around the building site footprint; • All tree removal and erosion control plans are to be first approved before work is done; • A Hold Harmless Agreement is to be submitted to the City of Tigard by the Tigard /Tualatin School District, covering any and all work and activity on the sites • Parks Systems Development Charges may be calculated and pre -paid. Should you have any questions regarding the above items, please let me know and will get clarification for you. Thanks! i ---N\ = IV - Tigard - halatin School District 23J Larry Hibbard Administration Center R /",o iv 6960 SW Sandburg Street v� O V Tigar, goo( 9725303-431-4047 0 /� 4 IL 503 431 d Ore 400 •f ax 2 �uu J www.ttsd.k12.or.us November 24, 2004 James Hendryx City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Alberta Rider Elementary School Dear Jim, Thank you for your letter of November 9, 2004. The items that you requested have been submitted, with the exception of the pre -paid Parks SDC's. If you can help us with that calculation (or refer me to the correct person) it would be appreciated. Additionally, the erosion control measures and tree protection measures have been installed per the respective plans. Our team has begun installation of the stabilization gravels, as discussed in our last meeting. With the completion of that step, we will be anticipating the issue of the foundation and structural permits. Can you provide an update on how those reviews are progressing? Any assistance or communication about the timelines is appreciated. Also, if there are other items that our project team can address to keep the processes moving, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincere, 4;4 . Stephen Poage Director of Capital Projects C: Bill Monahan Steve Lowder • • t u „`fig r JY, Ti and - Tualatin School District 23J Larry Hibbard Administration Center 6960 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 // �N� ere/ , A/ , 1i / 503-431 -4000 • fax 503 - 431 -4047 www.ttsd.k12.or.us November 12, 2004 Bill Monahan City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Monahan: This letter is intended to memorialize our agreement regarding the development of the Alberta Rider Elementary School. The Tigard/Tualatin School District ( "District ") understands and appreciates that the City of Tigard ( "City ") will permit the District to proceed with site preparation work prior to obtaining , site development approval through the City's planning process. Such site preparation work includes grading, excavation, fill and compaction for the construction access road, contractor staging /laydown area, building gravel pad, and a gravel pad for equipment to move around the building perimeter. The building plans have been completed and submitted and are currently under review by the City. The District understands that it proceeds with this site preparation work prior to site development plan approval at its own risk. We understand that the City reserves its full authority to review, approve, approve with conditions or deny the District's site development application pursuant to the City Development Code, and that the City's authorization to proceed with the site development work should not be construed as a commitment that the City will approve or will not modify the District's site development plan. We further understand that site development plan review is noticed public process that could result in an appeal of the District's plan. The final decision regarding the District's site development plan could therefore require modification to the site preparation work noted above. Any such modifications will be the District's sole responsibility and will be completed at the District's sole cost. The District appreciates the City's willingness to help the Disuict expedite construction of the Alberta Rider Elementary School in order to serve City students. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen D. Poage Director of Capital Projects CC: Dr. Steven Lowder Mr. Jim Hendrix ®® 11 1 M E M O R A N D U M February 3, 2005 TO: Craig Markus, CMG FR: Stephen Poage, TTSD RE: Weekly Permit Facilitation Meetings with the City of Tigard for Alberta Rider Elementary School C: Jer Pratton, TTSD Rick Rainone, CMG Dave Haggert, RCC Gary Lampella, C.O.T In response to your January 31, 2005 memo stating that the City of Tigard would like to deduct charges totaling $3,385.43 (for staff labor to attend these meetings) from the TTSD Trust Account, I offer the following: 1. The City requested the meetings. The City Manager even provided a written request that I personally attend in addition to our project team personnel. The City selected their attendees. 2. There was no notification that fees for agency labor would be charged, nor was there any agreement for services or charges. 3. The TTSD Trust Account can only be used for the cost of permits. It cannot pay for regulatory staff costs. Please suspend attendance at the weekly meetings by the TTSD project team until further notice. 1 Brian Blalock - Alberta Rider Elementary School Page 1 From: "Terry Keyes" <KeyesT @CleanWaterServices.org> To: "Brian Blalock" <brianb @ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 1/13/2005 12:10:36 PM Subject: Alberta Rider Elementary School Brian, Thanks for taking the time this morning to meet and compare notes on the Alberta Rider School project. I think our meeting provided us the opportunity to get on the same page and dispel some of the misconceptions and inaccuracies that the applicant appears to be promoting. For example, the applicant's statements that the review time at Clean Water Services (CWS) is six weeks and we were taking an extraordinary amount of time to review the engineering plans are based on either ignorance or a distorted view of reality. As I mentioned in our meeting, our review time is currently running two weeks. Before the holidays, it was one week. The Alberta Rider plans came into our office on Dec. 29, 2004. The plans were reviewed for completeness and entered them into our system on Dec. 30, 2004. I personally finished the review on January 7, 2005. If this timeline equals 6 weeks, I need to sign up for a refresher math class at PCC. Our initial review of the engineering plans resulted in a number of redlines that Westlake is now working on correcting. The two major issues from the standpoint of CWS are: 1. Lack of a storm sewer easement at the storm sewer connection point with Summit Ridge Since the storm sewer in Summit Ridge is now within the City of Tigard, the easement from Summit Ridge will be to the City of Tigard, not CWS. 2. Probable downstream capacity limitations for the runoff from the school property I anticipate Westlake's next plan submittal will clarify the capacity issue. If detention is needed, CWS will review the detention to insure it meets our Design and Construction Standards. The City of Tigard may also want to review the detention, which will be a private system, to insure it does not conflict with any aspect of the plumbing code. With these considerations in mind, I recommend the City no grant an on -site plumbing permit until the easement issue is addressed and the engineering plans from Westlake are nearly ready to approve with only minor redlines remaining. In addition, we recommend no walls or other structures above ground level be allowed until we have approved Westlake's engineering plans and issued our connection permit. - Please call or email me if you have any questions. Terry W. Keyes, P.E. Development Services Manager Clean Water Services 503 - 681 -3650 Brian Blalock - Alberta Rider Elementary School Page 2 • keyest @cleanwaterservices.org CC: <kim @ci.tigard.or.us >, "Marvin Spiering" < SpieringM @CleanWaterServices.org >, "Nora Curtis" <CurtisN @CleanWaterServices.org >, "Jackie Humphreys" < HumphreysJ @CleanWaterServices.org >, "Nichole Vanderzanderi" < VanderzandenN @CleanWaterServices.org> Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: December 28, 2004 Attendees: Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan Work is being done and inspections being performed on Gridline `J' footings. Robinson will be ready for more footing /foundation permits next week. Gary will contact Ray Miller to check the status of plan review revisions allowing further permits to be issued. The under -slab plumbing permit was discussed. Dave will submit the schematics later today that are required and the permit will possibly be ready for issuance tomorrow, Wednesday. He was informed that the sewer fee will have to be paid to CWS and the receipt brought in when he pulls the plumbing permit. There was discussion about how far the building can go on before the PFI permit is issued. Kim stated that she still needs ROW for 132 & Batterson; slope and construction easements and ROW for Bull Mountain Road and 133 She stated that the Bull Mountain Road frontage plans look good but she does need approvable plans for the remaining public improvements. It was agreed by the city and Robinson representatives present that construction on the site would not go beyond anything coming up and out of the ground until the Engineering issues are submitted and accepted. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 4 at 2:00 p.m. in the Permit Center. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: December 21, 2004 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan The Hold Harmless . agreement was signed and delivered to the city last week. We are awaiting a copy of the recorded Dedication Deed for right -of -way. A check for parks systems development fee was received and processed December 17. Revised plans and structural calculations have been received and are being reviewed by Ray Miller's office in anticipation of approval for a Foundation /Footing permit. Robinson Construction would like to receive a permit, inspection and begin pouring footings on December 22. This is dependent upon whether the revision review is correct and completed, and the city is working diligently to assist in meeting this schedule. Ultimately, it will depend upon all of the corrections being complete so the plan review may be completed. Engineering still needs approvable plans for Bull Mountain and say the plans for J Street look good. They will also need right -of -way documents in order to eventually issue the PFI permit. Jim asked attendants if they felt the meetings were worthwhile and the notes received helpful. All agreed that the meetings were very important in order to keep the project on track, communication open, and continued cooperation between all parties. Also, they all wanted to continue receiving the meeting notes. Conclusions were: • Footing /Foundation permit will be issued upon compliance with plan review conditions, hopefully within a day or two • Site permit, site utility permit, underslab plumbing and electrical permits are either under review or ready to issue once plan review conditions are met. • The next weekly meeting will be held Tuesday, December 28 at 2:00 p.m. in conference room #4 at the Permit Center. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: December 15, 2004 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Brian Blalock, Mike White, Dick Bewersdorff. Jim began the meeting relating some activities of the previous week. Kim noted that the `J' Street plans had been received and were being reviewed. She stated she needed an engineer's estimate for work at 132 Street, the east /west street (not yet named), and the intersection at 133 and Bull Mountain Road in order to bond. Also discussed were the tree removal issue and the waterline easement for Alberta's property. Approvable plans for the Bull Mountain frontage are needed, but Kim did not feel that issue will hold up any issuance of footing permits. Brian and Gary discussed the plan review conditions that had been sent from Ray Miller. Revisions that are necessary as stated on the plan review letter are crucial in order to issue a Footing /Foundation permit. Ray Miller will ultimately determine when to release that permit. Rick Rainone stated that the two items they are anxious to secure are the footing /foundation permits and the underslab plumbing permit. In addition, the underslab electrical is being reviewed by the Building Division. The Transmittal form used by the Building Division was discussed and noted the importance of using this when revisions /documents are being submitted. Sue will attach a copy of this form to email going out to development team. Critical is the Hold Harmless letter, yet to be sent by the school district. The Dedication Deed for right -of -way was returned to the School District this week for recordation at Washington County. There was discussion regarding outstanding land use conditions. Conclusions were: • Fill /Cut /Slope compaction tests will be submitted to the city from Brian Duvall at USA. • Site permit, site utility permit, underslab plumbing and electrical permits are either under review or ready to issue once plan review conditions are met. • Footing /Foundation permit will be issued upon compliance with plan review conditions. Meeting Date: December 8, 2004 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Brian Blalock, Mike White, Dick Bewersdorff. Jim began the meeting relating some activities of the previous week. Contractor would like to have a foundation permit by Friday. Ray Miller may be done with the FIRST review by Monday but there may be plan review conditions and corrections to meet. GL stated he had told Steve Poage there would be no commitment as far as a date the plan review would be done, but it would be soon. A site review letter was sent out by COT on December 7, 2004 Critical is the Hold Harmless letter, yet to be sent by the school district. Conclusions were: The city must be satisfied with response to the plan review letter from Ray Miller and until those issues are satisfied, no footing /foundation permit will be issued. Ultimately, Ray will determine when is okay to issue the footing /foundation permit. Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: January 11, 2005 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; Stephen Poage of Tigard /Tualatin School District; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Sue Ross The structural plan review has been completed and approved. Plans are ready for issuance. The foundation permit can be issued now and the underslab plumbing permit can be issued as soon as approval is received from Clean Water Services. Redlines were returned to Westlake from CWS. It was agreed that at this point with verbal approval from CWS that the city would proceed with issuance of the underslab plumbing permit. Pat attempted to contact Terry Keys from CWS for verbal approval but he was not available. Pat will ask him to contact Brian Blalock with verbal approval and the plumbing permit can be issued at that time. The final profile for Bull Mountain Road will be worked up today as Mike White from the city is meeting with Pat and Bernard from Westlake. Significant progress is being made on right -of - ways and easements. Stephen Poage related to Craig that he needed the information regarding easements and right -of -ways for the school board meeting on the 20` of January. Also, a "Petition to Annex" will be sent to Mr. Poage for action. In all, the meeting was constructive and it seems the required conditions for Alberta Rider are moving along. The experience of cooperation between all entities is greatly appreciated. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 • Susan Ross - 1 -14 RE CWS Letter.doc Page 1 January 14, 2005 Stephen Poage Tigard - Tualatin School District 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: This letter is an important update regarding the Clean Water Services permit for the Alberta Rider Elementary School project. At our weekly meeting this Tuesday, the city was told the Clean Water Services permit was `ready to go' and could be released by merely a telephone call from CWS to our Plans Examiner Supervisor, Brian Blalock. Brian received an email yesterday from Terry Keyes, Development Services Manager at Clean Water Services. He stated that the plans were not approved and the permit not ready to issue. He recommended the city not grant an on -site plumbing permit until an easement issue is addressed and the engineering plans from Westlake are ready to approve, with only minor redlines remaining. Terry also recommends no walls or other structures above ground -level be allowed until Westlake plans are approved and their connection permit issued. The two major issues Terry pointed out from the standpoint of CWS are: 1. Lack of a storm sewer easement at the storm sewer connection point with Summit Ridge. The easement from Summit Ridge will be to the City of Tigard, not to CWS; 2. Probable downstream capacity limitations for the runoff from the school property. Westlake will need to clarify the capacity issue to determine if on- site detention is needed. The permit was submitted to CWS on December 29, 2004, and the plan review time has been very quick. It is very important, however, that you are aware of what may be a critical holdup on the project's progression. The City of Tigard cannot issue further permits until Clean Water Services has had their requirements met and the permit issued. The city will continue to strive to help the project move along progressively but we must continue to follow the guidelines for ours and other entity policies and procedures. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director cc: Alberta Rider Project Team Members 7 Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: January 4, 2005 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan Notes taken by Gary Lampella, Building Official. Cornerstone agreed that they still needed CWS okay prior to issuance of the plumbing permit. A sign -off from Ray Miller Engineering is necessary for the remainder of the foundation permit. Three items remained for correction on the structural permit review. City Electrical staff agreed to the installation of under -slab conduit without the full electrical permit being issued. The meeting was short, approximately fifteen minutes and the next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 11 at 2:00 p.m. in the Permit Center. A note about other activity last week, a letter was sent to Stephen Poage regarding the critical situation that existed due to the fact that the District had not yet secured a permit from Clean Water Services. A copy of that letter is attached. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 ~ Susan Ross - 12 -15 -04 Meeting Notes.doc Page 1 Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: December 15, 2004 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Brian Blalock, Mike White, Dick Bewersdorff. Jim began the meeting relating some activities of the previous week. Kim noted that the 'J' Street plans had been received and were being reviewed. She stated she needed an engineer's estimate for work at 132' Street, the east/west street (not yet named), and the intersection at 133rd and Bull Mountain Road in order to bond. Also discussed were the tree removal issue and the waterline easement for Alberta's property. Approvable plans for the Bull Mountain frontage are needed, but Kim did not feel that issue will hold up any issuance of footing permits. • Brian and Gary discussed the plan review conditions that had been sent from Ray Miller. Revisions that are necessary as stated on the plan review letter are crucial in order to issue a Footing /Foundation permit. Ray Miller will ultimately determine when to release that permit. Rick Rainone stated that the two items they are anxious to secure are the footing /foundation permits and the underslab plumbing permit. In addition, the underslab electrical is being reviewed by the Building Division. The Transmittal form used by the Building Division was discussed and noted the importance of using this when revisions /documents are being submitted. Sue will attach a copy of this form to email going out to development team. A Hold Harmless form was delivered to the school district this week and it's return is critical. The Dedication Deed for right -of -way was returned to the School District this week for recordation at Washington County. There was discussion regarding outstanding land use conditions. Conclusions were: • Fill /Cut/Slope compaction tests will be submitted to the city from Brian Duvall at USA. • Site permit, site utility permit, underslab plumbing and electrical permits are either under review or ready to issue once plan review conditions are met. • Footing /Foundation permit will be issued upon compliance with plan review conditions. • The next weekly meeting will be held Tuesday, December 21 at 2:00 p.m. in conference room #4 at the Permit Center. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 4 r d IWi�lllu��o �J etI March 18, 2005 CITY TI '•,__ OREGON EEA Architects P.0 Greg Weiler 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: BUP2004 -00529 Construction Type: II - 1HR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E -1, A2.1, B, S1 Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -01) 1999 edition. The .Y) submitted plans are approved subject to the following conditions. 1. All exit - access doorways and doorways from unoccupied areas to the corridor shall be protected by tight - fitting smoke and draft control assemblies having a fire protection rating of not less than 20 minutes. Such doors shall not have louvers, mail slots or similar openings. The door and frame shall bear an approved label showing the rating followed by the letter "S" plus the manufactures information. Doors shall be maintained self - closing or shall be automatic closing by actuation of a smoke detector in accordance with OSSC 713.2. Smoke and draft control door assemblies shall be provided with a gasket installed so as to provide a seal where the door meets the stop on both sides and across the top. OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2.1 2. All openings at one-hour occupancies separation walls like storage rooms and boiler room shall have one -hour fire - protection rating. .' OSSC 302.3 (4) table 3 -B 37 located in corridor walls shall be protected by fixed glazing listed and labeled or marked for a fire protection rating of at least three- fourths hour and complying with section 713.8 and 713.9. OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2.2 In lieu of fire rated windows a tested and listed window sprinkler system can be used as interior protection of windows in this building. NOTE: The inspector to verify that sprinklers are installed per listing installation. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 116. pp not limited to: the following locations: Each unit of-glazing shall be 4. Safety glazing including but o g permanently identified by the manufacturer. Sec. 2406.4. Some of these locations are as follows: a. Glazing in ingress and means of egress doors except jalousies. b. Glazing in storm doors. c. Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel adjacent to a door where the nearest vertical edge is within a 24" arc of the door in a closed position and whose bottom edge is less than 60" above the floor or walking surface except when there is an intervening wall or other permanent barrier between the door and the glazing. d. Glazing that meets all the following conditions: In lieu of safety glazing, protective bar (1 1 /2" height minimum) may be installed on the accessible side(s) of the glazing 36" ± 2" above the floor. The bar shall be capable of withstanding a horizontal load of 50 plf without contacting the glass. Sec. 308.4 1) Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 sq ft. 2) Bottom edge less than 18" above the floor. 3) Top edge greater than 36" above the floor. 4) One or more walking surfaces within 36" horizontally of the glazing. e. All glazing in railings regardless of an area or height above a walking surface including structural baluster panels and nonstructural in -fill panels. 4. All exit and exit access doors shall be provided with panic hardware. OSSC Section 1007.3.10 5 All exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge '' or effort. OSSC 1003.3.1.8 6. Exit signs shall be illuminated at all times and shall be provided with a second source of power that will provide 1 1 hours of illumination in case of primary power loss.. OSSC 1003.2.8.5 FYI Additional exit signs may be required by the city field inspector to clearly indicate the path of egress. 7. The means of egress shall be provided with illumination of not less than 1 foot candle at the floor level anytime the building is occupied. The means of egress illumination shall be provided with a second source of power in case of primary power loss. OSSC 1003.2.9.2 8. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinlder, Truss Joist Shop Drawings, etc, will be charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the portion of the work being deferred. ) The minimum fee shall be $200.00. Deferred items; • Fire Alarms • Fire Sprinklers hot ;! American with Disabilities Act (ADA): It shall be the responsibility of the Architect, Engineer, Designer, Contractor, Owner and Lessee to research the applicability of the ADA requirements for the structure. The City of Tigard reviews the plans and inspects the structure only for compliance with Chapter 11 of the OSSC which may not include all of the requirements of the ADA. Live Loads Posted: The live loads for which each floor has been designed shall be conspicuously posted by the owner in that part of each story in which they apply, using durable metal signs, and it shall be unlawful to remove or deface such notices. The occupant of the building shall be responsible for keeping the actual load below the allowable limits. OSSC 1607.3.5 Approved Plans: 1 set of approved plans, bearing the City of Tigard approval stamp, shall be maintained on the jobsite. The plans shall be available to the Building Division inspectors throughout all phases of construction. OSSC 106.4.2 Certificate of Occupancy: No building or structure shall be used or occupied until the Building Official has issued a certificate of occupancy OSSC 109.1 Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided for all new buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. _ Respectfully, Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner March 15, 2005 :,,x _s' Val Henzel, Senior Plans Examiner tr RE '' 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 MAR ;� 200S Re: Alberta Rider Elementary School BIZ y OF TlCiARD Final Review Response BUILDING DWISIIIN Site Permit NO: BUP2004 -00529 Dear Ms. Henzel: ELLIS ESLICK ASSOCIATES The following for clarifications are in response to your March 10t letter: ARCHITECTS P.C. 1. Clarification on Corridor Glass Protection: We have deleted 33 interior corridor windows (VE item) basically at the classrooms. They remain at the library area (three places), and at the east wall of the main entry lobby (two places) looking into the P R I N C I P A L S FRANK E. ELLIS, MA s e WEILE gym. As I stated in my December 27t response to your second review, plumbing ; 1 / 4 ' � drawings show "deluge" sprinkler heads substituting for fire rated glazing at the d corridor "relites" p er NFPA 13 and 25, and UFC /UBC standard 9-3. The plumbing RICHARD H. ESLICK, AIA drawings P3.2W missed the deluge heads at the lobby relites — we will add two GREGORY N. WEILER, AIA \� ' (i heads per double relite. Also, per our telecom on March 10, 2005, we will add deluge sprinkler heads above the Kindergarten Corridor A212 glazing into the A s s o c I A r E s \d Al 'f Courtyard — one head above each of three sections of glass, and one head above iJ S �� Door No. 212 B. LINDA C. WALL, AIA `` -,y' FRANCIS X. McBRIDE � ° 2. Fire Resistive Construction Assemblies: UL design Numbers are listed on the "Wall Types Legend" on schedule sheets A3.1S and A3.2S for wall types 1 A, 1 B, 2, 5A, 5B, C1 and C2. The two schedule sheets were printed backwards by Willamette Print and Blue Print (WP &BP) in the three sets delivered to you — WP &BP is correcting your sets. Also, my response dated January 3, 2005 to your second review included "UL cut sheets" of the referenced Design Numbers — I have attached another copy for your easy reference. 3. Exit Sign at Library Door No. A226A: We will delete the exit sign above this door (into adjacent computer classroom) as you requested in our telecom of 03/10/05. 4. Play Area Fences and Gates: The fences and gates (with exit hardware), shown on our previous drawings, have been deleted (VE item) at both east and west play areas. If and when they are added back in, it is understood that the exit hardware for the gates will be required. Landscape drawings L2.2 and L2.4 did not get revised — please cross out the play area fences shown on these two sheets. I ‘ic A copy of your March 10t letter is attached, as well as the "UL cut sheets" referenced above, and by now, you should have the corrected sets of revised drawings back from WP &BP. Let me know if you need anything further to clear the fire /life safety permit. Sincerely, Greg Wei (2)17,WeAto/ , Encl. March 10, 2005 letter cc: Craig Markus, CCMI UL Cut Sheets Robinson Construction Brad Hoskins, TTSD 1230 SW FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 300, PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 t 503.223.6963 f 503.294.0827 e -mail eea @eeaarchitects.com March 10, 2005 CITY OF TIGARD EEA Architects P.0 Greg Weiler OREGON 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 • RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY" SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: BUP2004 -00529 Construction Type: YI - 1HR Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type:. E 1, A2.1, B, S1 Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -01) 1999 edition. The following information is required in order to complete the review. Per our phone conversation yesterday March 9, 2005 you were going to provide the following information as attachments or revised plans; 1. Clarification on glass located inside corridor on whether 3 /4 hour rated or sprinkler protected. OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2.2. 2. Clarification on where the fire resistive construction assembly's details as designed per UL are located in the revised plans. OSSC 106.3 3. Clarification on exit sign located on library side at computer room access. Occupant load on computer room based of this sign will require two exits from computer room. Therefore, remove sign or provide second exit from computer room. OSSC 1004.2.3.3 4. Clarification on play area at West and East ends of school on whether yards enclosed or not. The requirement for dispersal/gate hardware will be required if enclosed. OSSC 1006.3.5, 1007.3.11 Please provide an item by item response. When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectfully, al Benz , Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 - . -- 7 'a i7nl V : 6 OOOZ 'til'aEW 01/03/2005 14:13 5036243691 TIGARD BUILDING DEPT • PAGE 02/02 • January 3 2005 (14111111!*41111 CITY OF TIGARD Greg Weiler '�� 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 • REi ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Project Information Site Permit: )t3UP2004 -00529 Construction Type: II - 11 Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary Occupancy Type: E-1, A2.1, B, S1 Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Occupant Load: 2,366 Area: 67,800 Sq Ft Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC) 1998 edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 99 -01 (TVFR99 -Ol) 1999 edition. The following information is required in order to complete the review. PRELIMINARY REVIEW 1. Provide clarification on locations of draft stops and assemblies. OSSC 708.3.1.2.2. 2. Provide fire restive construction assemblies details as designed per UL. 3. Provide information on Boiler room location and construction details. Please provide an item by item response. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Truss Joist Shop Drawings, etc, will be charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the portion of the work being deferred. The minimum . fee shall be $200.00. Deferred items; o Fire Alarms • Fire Sprinklers When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. It.esp .l.ly G� Val Henze', Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171. TDD (503) 684 -2772 •' .... MEMORANDUM EEA ARCHITECTS P.C. ` <_ 1230 SW FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 300 ;...r�• Eff4 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 -3236 7 503.223.6963 / FAX 503.294.0827 TO: Val Henze! January 3, 2005 Building Department - City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 cc: Rick Rainone, Craig Markus Site FROM: EEA FAXED, $PAGES / FAX NO.: (503) 598 1960 ❑MAILED 111 MESSENGERED SUBJECT: Preliminary Review 02 Response Permit Number: BUP2004 -00910 In response to the City of Tigard memo dated 01/03/04, the following are the responses to each item. 1. DRAFT STOPS: OSSC 708.3.1.2.2 exception requires a draft stop every 100' or 9,000 s.f. of attic or concealed overhang. The exception was satisfied via the "alternative understanding letter" by providing sprinkler heads into concealed spaces as shown in the specifications (15300, 1.03,F,3). There are no concealed overhangs on the project.. Sheets A9.2W and A9.2E show general note 28 with a dashed line poche on stud walls that extend up to the roof metal decking. These poche walls are typically surrounding each classroom that are not masonry walls going to roof metal decking. Therefore, each classroom (and Activity space) has a "Draft Stop ". The library has a soffit wall on grid N allowing the library attic to be less than 9,000 s.f. and 100' east -west. The Administration area between Grids 3 and 6 as well as Grids A and J are also split up by the general note 28 to be much less than even 3,000 s.f. or 60' in any direction. The Gym and Multipurpose have no attics since they are exposed structure. The Kitchen is less than even 3,000 s.f. due to the occupancy separation from the Music room attic. The main entry and corridors are split up to be less than 9,000 s.f. or 100' in any direction via grids 3, 6, 7, 10, 12. There is also a draft stop around the Stage Attic, making the area between grids 7 and 12 as well as grids H and L less than even 3,000 s.f. 2. UL ASSEMBLIES DETAILS: UL listings are on sheets A3.2S and A3.1S for each wall type. See attached UL cut sheets showing which variations are used. 3. BOILER ROOM LOCATION AND DETAILS: The Boiler Room B205 is located on the main floor plan, on sheet A3.2W, grid 8 between grids H and J. Wall types shown at this location in the documents show wall type 1A which lists UL #: U465. Ceiling is 1 -hour rated per A1..1 legend at bottom center of sheet referencing detail 2/A5.5. Page 1 of 1 2001 FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY • t. ' . o: i FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) 819 J. • .. Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/1.31 } .� Fire Resistance Ratin:s - ANSI /UL 26 % — Confin blocks. One or more layers of rigid exti (�/ ` INf'�� � Design No.i7906, — - in. thick max having 1 in. min air space c - ' ' G THE DOW CHEMICAL CO THE Wall Rating — HR. OC CELFORTEC INC Nonbearing Wall Rating — 2 HR. u OWENS CORNING SPECIALTI 3/4° _ _ _ _ FOAM PRODUCTS —Type 150 i — 1 — 6A. Foamed Plastic*— (Optional -Not shoi 6 O O I E O I D O 1 5 5 /8' Rigid poly ocyanurate insulation for u �— 1 crete bloc One or more layers of rigi • " I tion, 4 in. thick max having 1 in. mina Horizontal Section i blocks. • BPB AMERICA INC • 1. Concrete Blocks* — Nominal 6 by 8 by 16 in, hollow or solid. BPB CELOTEX —Type Thermax Classification D -2 (2 hr). 'Bearing the UL Classification Mark ANCHOR CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC I •- Allowable compressive stress of 57% of max allowable compressive stress in accordance with the empirical design method. Design No. U904 BETCO BLOCK & PRODUCTS INC, DBA . Bearing Wall Rating — 3 HR. ARTHUR WHITCOMB • Nonbearing Wall Rating — 3 HR. WESTBROOK CONCRETE BLOCK CO INC ,- " . Allowable compressive stress of 75.6% of max allowable compressive —� — — — — — — — — — — — — stress in accordance with the empirical design method. ' o• ' : °_ •'' '' •' ! t ' r ° ° °' ' °' ° �— 2. Mortar — Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8 in. thick, of not '• ° '°1 t 1 7 -5 /s' MIN. less than 2 -1/4 and not more than 3 -1/2 parts of clean sharp sand to 1 I � ' F ' ° t part Portland cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 �I '' .. ! ' ) i percent hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. F .' O 0 O Horizontal Section ' . -' • ssifi-. � y penal Not -Sholc . u • . • 1. Foamed- Rlastic"- -(9p ' 1. Concrete Blocks* — Various designs. Classification C -3 (3 hr). : . .. - _ See Concrete Blocks category for list of eligible manufacturers. BPB AMERICA INC 2. Mortar— Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8 in. thick, of not BPB CELOTEX —Type Thermax less than 2 -1/4 and not more than 3 -1/2 parts of clean sharp sand to 1 *Bearing the UL Classification Mark part Portland cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 percent hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. 3. Portland Cement Stucco or Gypsum Plaster— Add 1/2 hr to Classifi- 2 D n O. U907 cation if used. Attached to concrete bolcks (Item 1). $ • 4. Loose Masonry Fill — If all core spaces are filled with loose dry Nonbearing Wall Rating — 3 or 4 HR. expanded slag, expanded clay or shale (Rotary Kiln Process), water (See Item 1) repellant vermiculite masonry fill insulation, or silicone treated perlite sia' • loose fill insulation add 1 hr to Classification. _ 5. Foamed Plastic* — (Optional -Not Shown) —1 -1 1-1/2 in. thick max, 4 ft L _ wide sheathing attached to concrete blocks (Item 1). Cr BPB AMERICA INC z sn. 000D0000 BPB CELOTEX. —Type Thermax " i " 'Bearing the UL Classification Mark 0 2 • • Design No. U905 Unit Heigth -t2' Bearing Wall Rating — 2 HR. 1. Concrete Blocks* — Classification C -3 (3 hr) and B -4 (4 hr). • • Nonbearing Wall Rating — 2 HR Rating Certificate Web Face Shell No. �2 •.- _ — _ — — — _ . Hr Thkns Thkns Core — { I . e ; : ° ., t • ° • .� „� t . �:: . ;. 3 C -3 1- 1 /8in. 1-1/4 in. 2 1 ( 4 B-4 1 in. 1-1/2i n 2 t ■ :,..-1 O 4 ,11 �'. (' �o...• . 7•i /8 - MIN. • A ,. _ : .. •. TARMAC AM INC 0 ``� • I;« rontoi Section 2. Mortar— Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8 in. thick, of not I less than 2 -1/4 and not more than 3-1/2 parts of clean sharp sand to z one part Portland cement (proportioned by volume) and 15 percent 1. Concrete Blocks* — Various designs. Classification D -2 (2 hr). hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. See Concrete Blocks category for list of eligible manufacturers. 3. Portland Cement Stucco or Gypsum Plaster— Add 1/2 hr to classifi- 2. Mortar— Blocks laid in full bed of mortar, nom. 3/8 in. thick, of not cation if used. Attached to concrete blocks (Item 1). less than 2 -1/4 and not more than 3 -1/2 parts of clean sharp sand to 1 4. Loose Masonry Fill— (Not shown) — If all core spaces are filled with part Portland cement (proportioned by volume) and not more than 50 loose dry expanded slag, expanded clay or shale (rotary kiln process), percent hydrated lime (by cement volume). Vertical joints staggered. water repellant vermiculite masonry fill insulation, or silicone treated 3. Portland Cement Stucco or Gypsum Plaster- Add 1/2 hr to classifi- perlite loose fill insulation, Class C -3 (3 hr) concrete blocks will provide ._ cation if used. Where combustible members are framed in wall, plaster a 4 hr fire resistance rating. • or stucco must be applied on the face opposite framing to achieve a 5. Foamed Plastic * — (Optional -Not Shown) —1 -1/2 in. thick max, 4 ft max. Classification of 1 -1/2 hr. Attached to concrete blocks (Item 1). wide sheathing attached to concrete blocks (Item 1) or interior wall sur- - 4. Loose Masonry Fill — If all core spaces are filled with loose dry face. expanded slag, expanded clay or shale (Rotary Kiln Process), water BPB AMERICA INC repellant vermiculite masonry fill insulation, or silicone treated perlite BPB CELOTEX —T e Thermax loose fill insulation add 2 hr to classification. • • _. 5. Foamed Plastic' — (Optional -Not Shown) —1 -1 /2 in. thick max, 4 ft *Bearing the UL Classification Mark wide sheathing attached to concrete blocks (Item 1). BPB AMERICA INC BPB CELOTEX —Type Thermax *Bearing the UL Classification Mark • I 01/03/2005 15:36 5032940827 EE ARCHITECTS PAGE 03/07 • s'4= cuu st ru ttt1� t AN(:E DIRECTORY -- FIRE RESISTANCE DIRER FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) �.' 0 Fire Resistance Ratings ANSI /U . . Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI/ LJI 263 (B 1..•-•% , : _ Continue. spaced 8 in OC along the edges of the( Joint the board, j i Design No. U4, 8, at 6, Joint Tape card Compound— (Not Sh Nonbearing Wall Rating — 1 HR joint compound, applied in two coats t' at tape, 2 in. wide, embedded in fast layi t7 , . °Bearing the UL Classification Mark . Design No: �o p + - v Nonbearing Wall Ra' j �11�1SA I L . V r © -.._ - -'•. -- "A nrr s>al r. —41 . ,- .„.„,- - r A , ky 4 Cif a ,; �j < )��`�������1�y1 - z. Studs tm • Chael shaped, 1 -5/8 in wide by 1.1/4 in. deep with 5/16 ,,.H __� v:4 .. _ � „ ire folded back return flange legs. Fabricated from 20 MSG (0.0329 m ' • x , o e metal thickness) Bolo steel. Max stud spacing 16 in- OC. Studs • v ' • 0 3 ' . . to be cut 1 in, less than assembly height. mi n'bar 2, Bracing — Two Types — Cat from steel runners or studs, cavity width. 1- Stade — Channel shaped 3 -5/8 in. wide by 1 -1/4 in deep with 5/16 Fastened with two 1/8 in. long, Type S-12, steel screws in each stud in. folded back return flange legs- Fabricated from No. 20 MSG (0,0329 space braces max 48 in dC. in., min. bare metal thickness) galvanized steel. Max stud spacing 16 in. 7:-: =- „ OC. Studs to be cut 1 in less than assembly height 2. Floor and Ceiling Runners, (Not Shown) — Channel shaped rim- —r 8- ia'9Ce• - nerg, 3S/8 in, wide by 1-1/4 in, deep, fabricated from ND- 20 MSG 3 F and Ceiling Runners — (Not Shown) — Channel shaped run - • (0,0329 in„ min- bare metal thickness) galv steel_ Attached to floor and in., m m-5 bare in. wide by 1-1/4 es in_ deep, fabricated from 20 MSG (0.0329 ng9 ceiling with fasteners, 24 in. OC, max. in., min bare metal thickness) galv steel. Attached to floor and ceiling • with fasteners. 3. Foamed Plastic" — (Optional) nom 1/2 in, thick rigid polystyrene 4. Cementitious Backer Units"— Board - -2 - oar 5/8 in. thick, square insulation installed between steel studs (item 1) and Mineral nd Fiber edge, attached to studs with 1 -1/4 in. long. Board (item 4), attached to studs with 1 in- long, Type S -12 steel Type 512, corrosion - resistant; wafer -head steel screws, spaced 8 in. OC. screws. Joints covered with )ass fiber mesh tape. :.� See Foamed plastic (CCVW) category for names of manufacturers- UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO — Durock Exterior Cement •a: 4. Cementitious Backer Units " — Board 1/2 or 5/8 in. thick, square Board or Aurock brand Cement Board_ edge, attached to studs with 1 -1/4 in_ long. 5, Batts and Blankets" u Placed to 611 interior of stud cavity. Min thick_ Type 5 -12, corrosion resistant, wafer -head steel screws, spaced 8 in. OC. Hess 1.1/2 in. both stud cavities - joints covered with glass fiber mesh tape.. THERMAFIBER I L C Type SAFB. Board applied over Foamed Plastic (Item 3) requires 1 -5 /8 in. long screws, 6 or to pee n Board' — Gypsum panes 5/8 in_ thick, with beveled square same designation and spacing as described above. or tared edges, applied vertically or horizontally: Vertical joints can- tered over studs. Al] joints staggered a min of 12 an. from Cementitious UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Durock Exterior Cement Board or Durock Brand Cement Board, Backer Unit oints. When applied vertically, secured to studs with 1 in. 5, Batts and Blaxtkete" Placed to fill interior of stud tool 3 in. min long Type S- '12 steel screws, spaced 8 in. OC along the edges of the thickness. ty board and 12 in. OC in the field of the board. When applied horizon secured to studs with 1 in. long Type 5-12 steel screws, spaced 8 • 1TdHRMAPIBER L I. C —Type SAFE_ tally, 11 6. Gypsum Board` I R Applied I. vertically 5/8 in thick, in. OC along the of the board and 8 in. OC in the field of the -.. with 1 in. long, Type S -12 screws, spaced 8 in. OC along the edges of cavity depth t o be a min of 3-1/2 m.and SCX boards are used, sited the board and 12 in. OC in the field of the board- CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY—Types AR, C, IP -AR, CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY—Types C, IP -X2, Il'C -AR IP -Xl, b.' -X2, IPC -AR, SIX, FRX or WRC, CONTINENTAL GYPSUM COMPANY —Type CG5-5. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO - -Types AR, C, FRX, FRX -C, G -P GYPSUM CORP, SUB OP IP -Ali, LP-Xi, IP -X2, IPC - .AR, 50C or WRC. GEORGIA - PACIFIC CORP --Type 5. YESO I'ANAMEItICANO S A DE C 'V Type C, 1X' -AR, IP -Xl, LAFARGE GYPSUM, DI V OF II' -X2 IPGAI� $CX AR or WRC. LP�FARGE CORP—Types LGFGC LGFC -C /A. 7. Joint Tape and Compound — Vinyl, dry or/remixed joint compound, PABCQ GYPSUM, D11V OF ap lied in two coats to joints and screw hea Paper tape,. 2 in- wide, PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS INC —Type C. em edded in first layer of compound over all joints. " ' . ;QitPana'x UNTIED STATES GYPSUM CO—Types C, IP-X2, IPGAR : . YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V —Types C, IP-X2, IPC- l( ° . , . - and l Tel mods difiee AR 8- Joints— Treated with fiber tape annd latex mod Portland 7. Joint Tape and Compound — Vin cement, mortar or ANSI A136_I type 1 organic adhesive. • applied in two coats to joints and sere heads; paper tape, � compound, :Bearing the UL Classification Mark in fast layer of compound over all joints. As an alternate, nominal 3/32 in. thick gypsum veneer plaster may be applied to the entire surface of Classified veneer baseboard. Joints reinforced. Design 1 1 R ng — 8. Joints — Treated with glass fiber tape and latex modified • Portland Nonbearing Wall aiirtg 2 Ili U cement mortar or ANSI A136.1 type 1 organic adhesive. Material — 0 G 1 ------ 1 ! o Not (Optional — 9. Vapor Permeable Water Barrier Sheathing Watar ) —A r equired. aa li�ht��lir ∎»troliro�llttmina wtt '' 10. Barrier— (Optional Not Shown) — Commercial asphalt sate- PAVit' lWeti 1YatlitiftlMatre { 1f rated and /or coated felt. • ._. 'Bearing the U1. Classification Mark rsnuh.d 5 a. CEILING HORZ. SECTION , .. - 1 ::. ' 8n .< FLpOR 1. Floor and Ceiling Runners— "J" shaped, 2 -I /2 in. wide with unequal • LOOK FOR THE UL MARK ON PRODUCT P il 2001 FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY If . } f: FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) is Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI /UL 263 (BXUV)– Confinued Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI /UL "' ("")"" ",�f � . ri Y L eral support of studs, support may be provided by means of steel end joint and 12 in. O.C. vertically. Board v `�� ' straps, channels or other similar means as specified in the design of a board side joints all screws shall be locate particular steel stud wall system. layer also secured to the second and third • 4. Batts and Blankets* — (Optional) — When used 1, 1 -1 /2, 2 or 3 in. G, self - tapping steel screws located midw • ▪ '- thick mineral wool batts supplied in 24 in. widths, placed to fill interior the horizontal joint. Joints in each layer of of wall. the joints in the adjacent layer and on of . See Batts and Blankets (BZXX) category for names of manufacturers. For 3 Hr Rating Three layers of wallbo; 5. Gypsum Board— 1/2 in. thick, 4 ft. wide. Four layers of wallboard to be applied vertically with joints centered -- be used. Inner layers to be applied vertically with joints centered over be applied vertically or horizontally. Firs studs. Outer layer may be applied vertically or horizontally. First layer with 1 in. lon& Type S, self - tapping steel fastened to each stud with 1 in. long Type S, self-tapping-steel screw. to each stud through the first layer with Second layer fastened to each stud through the first layer with 1 -5/8 in. tapping steel screws. Third layer fastenec long Type S, self- tapping steel screws. Third layer fastened to each and second layers with 2 -1/4 in. long, T) First and second layer screws shall be lot stud through the first and second layers with 2-1/4 in. long, Type S, self- tapping steel screws. Fourth layer fastened to each stud through bottom of wall, respectively, with a maxi second and third layers with 2 -5/8 in. long„ T e S, self- vertically. The third layer screws shall be iocateu c in. rruui to anu the first, y Type bottom of wall with a maximum spacing of 12 in. O.C. vertically. Each tapping steel screws. First, second and third layer screws shall be third layer horizontal board end shall be centered over and secured to installed with a maximum spacing of 48 in. O.C. vertically. Fourth layer the stud with Type S, self - tapping steel screws spaced 1/2 in. from end •vertically installed wallboard attached with screws spaced 12 in. O.C. joint and 12 in. O.C. vertically. Third layer, also secured to the first and vertically. Fourth layer horizontal board end shall be centered over and the second layers with 1-1/2 in. long, Type G, Self - tapping steel screws secured to the stud with screws spaced 1/2 in. from end joint and 12 located midway between studs and 1 in. from the horizontal joint. in. O.C. vertically. Board end joints shall be staggered. At board side Board end joints shall be staggered. Vertical board joints to be stag - joints all screws shall be located 1/2 in. from the longitudinal )joints. gered from the joints in the adjacent layer and on opposite sides of Horizontal applied fourth layer also secured to the second and third studs. layers with 1 -1/2 in. Jong, Type G, self - tappping steel screws located BPB AMERICA INC midway between studs and 1 in. from the longitudinal joint. Joints in BPB CELOTEX — Type FRP. each layer of wallboard to be staggered from the joints in the adjacent 5. Joint Tape and Compound (Not Shown) — Vinyl or casein, dry or layer and on opposite sides of studs. premixed joint compound applied in two coats to joints and screw • BPB AMERICA INC BPB CELOTEX —Type FRP. heads. Paper tape, 2 in. wide, embedded in first layer of compound * over all joints. T. Bearing the UL Classification Mark *Bearing the UL Classification Mark r Design No. U463 (,dA(.L �� Nonbearing Wall Rating — 3 or 4 HR (See Item 4) 5. Design No. 1465 G Nonbearing Wall Rating —1 HR. • 2 3 Q4 © �� • CE) 7 / ; v . v . q . .—..�� .. —�— D ,. - t ..: i ° HORIZ. SECTION . 0 ' \ ' IE 02 � Il1i� °•.CEILING D•., • . . •. o 1. Floor and Ceiling Runners — (not shown) — Channel shaped run- © �I� © 1 °' ners, 3 -5/8 in. wide (min), 1 -1/4 in. legs, formed from min No. 25 MSG • • IM� N ill +I (min No. 20 MSG when Item 4C is used) galv steel, attached to floor o:• °' ° o II rO and ceiling with fasteners spaced 24 in. OC max. ,: FLOOR :e. �IIII 2. Steel Studs— Channel shaped, 3 -5/8 in. wide (min), 1 -1/4 in. legs, • 3/8 in. folded back returns, formed from min No. 25 MSG (min No. 20 1. Studs — - Channel-shaped, 1 -5 /S in. wide by 1 1/4 in. deep, with MSG when Item 4C is used) galv steel spaced 24 in. OC max. 5/16 in. folded back return flange legs. Fabricated from No. 25 MSG 3. Batts and Blankets* — (Optional) — Mineral wool or glass fiber batts galv steel. Stud spacing 16 or 24 in. OC. Studs to be cut 1 in. less than partially or completely filling stud cavity. . assembly height. See Batts and Blankets (BZJZ) category for names of Classified companies. - 2. Floor and Ceiling Runners — - Channel- shaped runners, 1 -5/8 in 4. Gypsum Board* — 5/8 in. thick, 4 ft wide, attached to steel studs and _ wide by 1 -1/4 in. deep, fabricated from No. 25 MSG galv steel. floor and ceiling track with 1 in. long, Type S steel screws spaced 8 in. Attached to floor and ceiling with fasteners spaced 24 in. OC. max. OC along edges of board and 12 in. OC in the field of the board. Joints 3. Batts and Blankets* — - (optional) - Nominal 1 -1/2 in. thick, placed oriented vertically and sta:gered on opposite sides of the assembly. in interior of wall cavity. t �� • .: - • .. - See Batts and Blankets (BZXX) category for names of manufacturers. - "" 4. Gypsum Board* — 1/2 in. thick, 4 ft wide with square or tapered - 1-2-in-.-.04. 1' ed AMERICAN GYPSUM CO —Type AG -C. °: wallboard .. For 4 Hr Rating - Four layers of llboard to be used. Inner layers to be BEIJING NEW BUILDING MATERIALS CO LTD —Type applied vertically with joints centered over studs. Outer layer may be DBX -1. i. • applied vertically or horizontally. First layer fastened to each stud with 1 BPB AMERICA INC • in. long Type S, self - tapping steel screws. Second layer fastened to each BPB CELOTEX —Type 1. .. stud through the first layer with 1 -5/8 in. long, Type S, self - tapping steel CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Types AR, C, IP -AR, screws. Third layer fastened to each stud through the first and second IF-X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SHX, WRC or WRX. layers with 2 -1/4 in. long, Type S, self - tapping steel screws. Fourth layer CONTINENTAL GYPSUM COMPANY —Types CG -C, CG5 -5, fastened to each stud through the first, second and third layers with 2 -5/8 CG6 -6, CG9 -9, CGTC -C. in. long, Type S, self - tapping steel screws. First layer screws shall be G -P GYPSUM CORP, SUB OF -- located 5 in. from top and bottom of wall with a maximum spacing of 48 GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORP —Types 5, 9, C, DGG, DS, GPFS6. in. O.C. vertically between to and bottom screws. Second and third layer JAMES HARDIE GYPSUM INC —Type Max "C" or Fire X. screws shall be located 4 and 3 in., respectively, from the top and bottom LAFARGE GYPSUM, DIV OF of wall with the same vertical spacing as the first layer screws. Fourth LAFARGE CORP —Types LGFC2, LGFC2A, LGFC6, LGFC6A, layer screws shall be located 2 in. from top and bottom of wall and spaced LGFC -C, LGFC -C/ A. 12 in. O.C. vertically. Each fourth layer horizontal board end shall be NATIONAL GYPSUM CO —Types FSK -C, FSK -G, FSW -C, ti centered over and secured to the stud with screws spaced 1/2 in. from FSW -G, FSW . 8 FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY (BXRH) ire Resistance Ratings - ANSI /UL 263 (BXUV)– ntinued Fire Resistance Ratings - ANSI /UL 263 (BXUV)– Continued PABCO GYPSUM, DIV OF�� • • JAMES HARDIE GYPSUM INC —Type Max'C" . PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS IN T e PG -C. LAFARGE GYPSUM, DIV OF REPUBLIC GYPSUM CO —Type RG -C. /J •0' LAFARGE CORP —Types LGFC -C, LGFC -C /A. SIAM GYPSUM INDUSTRY CO LTD —Type X -1 NATIONAL GYPSUM CO —Type FR or WR. STANDARD GYPSUM L L C —Type SG -C. PABCO GYPSUM, DIV OF TEMPLE- INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS CORP —Type TG -C. PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS INC —Type C or UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type AR, C, FRX -G, IP -AR, PG -C. IP -X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SHX, WRC or WRX. REPUBLIC GYPSUM CO —Type RG -C. YESO PANAMERICANO S A DEC V —Type AR, C, IP -AR, SIAM GYPSUM INDUSTRY CO LTD —Type EX -1 IP -X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SHX, WRC or WRX. STANDARD GYPSUM L L C —Type SG -C. WESTROC INC —Type Westroc Fireboard. TEMPLE- INLAND FOREST PRODUCTS CORP —Type TG -C. -4r� Gyps •• .: UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type AR, C, FRX -G, IP -AR, IP -Xl, IP -X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SHX, WIC or WRX. --- 1..144-in_ YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V —Type AR, C, IP -AR, CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Types AR, IP -AR. IP -Xl, IP -X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SHX, WRC or WRX. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Types AR, IP -AR. 5A. Gypsum Board* — (As an alternate to Item 5) — Nom 3/4 in. thick, YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V —T •es AR, IP -AR. installed as described in Item 5 with screw length increased to 1-1/4 in. • * • .. - - - • em •, • • . • : -- for base layer and 2 -1/4 in. for face layer. • ; :......: :: : ... °.. - - ' CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Types AR, IP -AR Illp • • . - - . • , • . „ , UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Types AR, IP -AR. Item L___• • YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V Types AR, IP -AR. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY Type FRX. 5B. Gypsum Board* — (As an alternate to Item 4 and 5A) — 5/8 in. thick UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type FRX. gypsum panels, installed as described in Item 5 with Type S -12 steel 5. Joint Tape and Compound — Vinyl, dry or premixed joint compound, I screws. The length and spacing of the screws as specified under Item 5. applied in two coats to joints and screw heads; paper tape, 2 in. wide, , CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Type FRX. embedded in first layer of compound over all joints. As an alternate, UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type FRX. nominal 3/32 in. thick gypsum veneer plaster may be applied to the 5C. Gypsum Board* — (As an alternate to Items 5, 5A and 5B) - 5/8 in. entire surface of Classified veneer baseboard. Joints reinforced. thick, 2 ft wide, tongue and groove edge, applied horizontally to one t6,–F'urri o • •.1. 4 • - L'* - : • — esi e • " •.iv side of the assembly (as the outer layer on the two layer side). Secured • %.: . • . • • - .: , .. : as described in Item 5. Joint covering (Item 6) not required. o : - CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY — Type SHX. w ► . t . UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type SI-IX. \ Bearing the UL Classification Mar YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V— Type SHX. \\ 6. Joint Tape and Compound — Vinyl, dry or premixed joint compound, applied in two coats to joints and screw heads; paper tape, 2 in. wide, Design No. U466 embedded in first layer of compound over all joints. As an alternate, Nonbearing Wall Rating —1 HR. nominal 3/32 in. thick gypsum veneer plaster may be applied to the entire surface of classified veneer base board. Joints reinforced. • Q i 0 0 7. Caulking and Sealants* — (Optional, not shown) — A bead of acous- tical sealant applied around the partition perimeter for sound control. UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO—Type AS. T-- 61/ZWj..... +G,ICII *Bearing the UL Classification Mark p M ame . -, ,-, .. ,3- Design No. U467 — 1 O! Ae ,7. Nonbearing Wall Rating — 2 HR. 0 © 1 24• } p - 1. Floor and Ceiling Runner— (not shown) — Channel-shaped runners, CEILIN _,a G ! � Q • Ai��i!�Y`�`!� is 1 -5/8 in. wide by 1 in. deep fabricated from 25 MSG (20 MSG when E © :::: Item 5B is used) galv steel. Attached to floor and ceiling with fasteners, 24 in. OC, max. H ORZ. SE CTIO N 2. Studs— Channel- shaped, 1 -5/8 in. wide by 1 -1/4 in. deep with 1/4 0 1� 0 in. folded back return flange legs. Fabricated from 25 MSG (20 MSG gigs O © �J,, ,j♦ 8 O when Item 5B is used) galv steel. Max stud spacing 24 in. OC. • @ 3. Bracing — Two Types — Cut from steel runners or studs, cavity width. o 1 ' Ip 0 :: ;;?; ;;� . Fastened with two 1/2 / 2 in. long, Type S steel screws in each stud, spa FLOOR braces max 48 in. OC. As an alternate bracing cut from gypsum wall- board, length equal to stud cavity width and 6 in. wide. Fasten with 1. Floor and Ceiling Runners — "J" shaped, 2 -1/2 in. wide with unequal two 1 in. long, Type S steel screws (1 -1/4 in. long if Item 5A is used) in legs of 1 in. and 2 in., fabricated from 24 MSG (20 MSG when Item 4B . - i each stud, space braces max 48 in. OC. is used) galv steel. Runners attached to structural supports with steel 4. Batts and Blankets * — (Optional) Mineral wool or glass fiber batts, fasteners located not greater than 2 in. from ends and not greater than partially or completely filling stud cavity. See Batts and Blankets (BZJZ) 24 in. OC. category for names of manufacturers. 2. Steel Studs— "C -H" shaped studs, 2 -1/2 in. wide by 1 -1/2 in. deep, =:1 5. Gypsum Board * — 5/8 in. thick. Screw attached, single layer side with fabricated from 25 MSG (20 MSG when Item 4B is used) gals steel 1 in. long, Type S steel screws spaced 12 in. OC. Wallboard on double spaced 24 in. OC. Vertically restrained walls require studs to be cut 3/8 layer side, base layer attached with 1 in. long, Type S steel screws in. less than floor to ceiling height. spaced 24 in. OC, face layer attached with 1 -5/8 in. long, Type S steel 3. Gypsum Board * — 1 in. thick gypsum wallboard liner panels, sup - screws spaced 12 in. OC. Wallboard joints oriented vertical or horizon- plied in nominal 24 in. widths. Vertical edges inserted in "H" shaped tal, with or without offset. Butt joints located over studs. section of "C -H" studs. Free edge of end panels attached to long let of AMERICAN GYPSUM CO —Type AG -C. "J" runners with 1 -5/8 in. long Type S steel screws spaced not greater BEIJING NEW BUILDING MATERIALS CO LTD — Type than 12 in. OC. DBX -1. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY Type SLX. CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY —Types AR, C, IP -AR, UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO —Type SLX. .. IP -X1, EP-X2, IPC -AR, SCX, SHX, WRC or WRX. YESO PANAMERICANO S A DE C V —Type SLX. -- CONTINENTAL GYPSUM COMPANY Types CG-C, CG5-5, 4. Gypsum Board * — 1/2 in. or 5/8 in. 4 ft wide applied vertically and CGTC -C. attached to studs and runners with 1 in. long Type S steel screws G-P GYPSUM CORP, SUB OF . spaced 12 in. OC. GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORP —Types 5, C. AMERICAN GYPSUM CO —Type AG-C. LOOK FOR THE UL MARK ON PRODUCT tea•: . 12/'28/2004 13:18 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 01/e5 • MEMORANDUM • EEA ARCHITECTS P.C. uck 28 NW 1230 SW FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 300 111 } + "'t „' PORTLAND, OREGON ''� M 04.3236 CI � , 363.223.6963 / FAX 503,294,0827 OF I i1��1 BUILD PT T -LT O; Val Henze! _ ' December 27, 2004 Building Department - City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 cc: Rick Rainone, Craig Markus Site • FROM: EEA CO I ® FAXED, 6 PACES / FAX NO.: (503) 598 1960 [l MAILED MESSENCERED SUBJECT: Preliminary. Review Response Sal Latcpt- Permit Number: BUP2004 -009 -* In response to the City of Tigard memo dated 12/27/04, the following are the responses to each item. 1. WEST PLAY EXITING: Chain -link fencing and masonry bollard walls have been deleted west of the • building at Owner request. Therefore, exiting is not through a court (1006.3.5). If fencing were to be- installed as originally drawn,.the gates are provided with panic devices (per previous agency meetings), in order to comply with 1007.3.11. 2. LIBRARY EXITING: Library exiting to show all exits coming from the Library to the Corridor A223 via the Checkout A22813, and Library Work A227 (not using Computer room 3 exit), These 2 doors are 23' -0” apart (as the crow flies) per code. Therefore, the distance between the Checkout door A228B and Library Work door A227 is more than 1/2 the diagonal of the library (45'-11" / 2 W 23' -0° distance required). 3, STAIR STORAGE SPRINKLERED: Per 904.2.4.3 and 1003.3,3.9, the storage rooms under the stairs are to be sprinklered per the specifications. 4. EAST COVERED PLAY: The East Covered Play is not a court. In addition, the chain -link fencing on the north side of the East covered play has been removed. 5. CORRIDOR OPENING PROTECTION: Plumbing drawings show deluge heads substituting fire -light glazing in corridor windows as per code. However, glazing in the corridors is being considered to be removed in value engineering discussions. In addition, 1004.3.4.3.2,Exception 2 states exterior walls of buildings may have unprotected openings. 6, INTERVENING ROOM SMOKE DETECTION: Electrical drawings show smoke detection in all intervening rooms per 1007.3.4 7. MEANS OF EGRESS I.Q. AREAS: Electrical drawings show locations of exit signs, and they are referenced on the ceiling plans per 1003,2,8. 8. CORRIDOR WALLS AT PLAY AREA GLASS: Since the East Covered Play is exterior, walls do not need to be rated from corridor to exterior. The walls are actually built as 1 -hour walls (openings are not rated per 1004.3.4.3.2) • 9. PROVIDE LISTED FIRE RESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES; See Drawing Sheets A3.1S and A3.2S wall types. 10. PROVIDE MASONRY VENEER DESIGN: There are no veneers over the maximum height allowed by UBC. Veneer does not exist over openings, Veneer ties are specified in 04210, 2.02, B, 11. COOLER/FREEZER MANUFCTURER INFORMATION: Imperial Manufacturing is approved by the State of Oregon. License Number 98PFC, Page 1 of 1 12/28/2004 13:18 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 02105 2. IXL Brick • 3. Mutual Materials 4. Approved Substitution 2.02 MASONRY REINFORCEMENT AND ACCESSORIES • A. Preformed Control Joints: Polyvinytchloride material, provide with corner and tee accessories. B. Brick Veneer Ties at Metal Frame Construction: 1. Corrosion resistant anchors spaced maximum 1S inches on center on both . • horizontal and vertical directions. Anchor ties shall have a lip or hook on the extended leg that will engage or enclose a galvanized, horizontal joint reinforcement wire of No 9 gage or equivalent. 11 2. Acceptable systems: a. For Concrete Backing: Dur -o -Wall D/A . 100 dovetail slot systems with Dur -o -Wall D/A 131 anchors, b. For Masonry Backing: Dur -o -Wall D/A 360S Seismic Ladur -Eye system. c. For Metal Stud Backing: Dur -o -Wall p/A 213S system with two • .. (2) #10 -16 coated screws 0/A 807, C. • Masonry Flashing: Grace Masonry Products, Perm -A- Barrier wall flashing system with W.R. Grace, Bituthene termination mastic or Fortifiber Corporation, 3 oz. "Copper Armored Sisal Kraft." D. Mastic or Tape for Flashing: Type as recommended by flashing manufacturer. E. Weep Holes: Preformed plastic tubes, wick - filled. Trim Weep cord to flush with finish surface. F. Pea Grave!: Y inch, washed. 2.03 MORTAR MIX A. Mortar for brick shall be ASTM C270, Type S or Type M with minimum compressive strength of 2000 psi at 28 days and shall be mixed in the following proportions. by volume: B. 1, part Portland Cement Type I or I1 (ASTM C150)_ • 1. Not more than 1 part hydrated lime or lime putty (ASTM C207). 2. Not less than 2 to not more than 3 times the sums of the volumes of cement and lime of damp loose sand (ASTM C144). • C. Additive: Manufacturer mortar with integral water repellant, "Dry-Block System" as produced by Forcer Chemical Co., Krete Ind. "Block -Gard Water Repellant ", or approved. �:.. . SEPTEMBER 2004 rrso - ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY C04210-4, 0208.00 BRICK 1Lf 1i�!Lbb4 13:18 50.3234U82( EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 04105 1 . / UB:52 56362436/37 TIGARD BUILDING DEPT PAGE 02103 > December 27, 2004 %L',,r.: rt CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Greg Weiler 1230 SW First Ave., #300 Portland, Oregon 97204 RE: AL13ERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Proje F nf` 9. Site Permit: $UP2004 -00$29 Tenant Name: Alberta Rider Elementary- Occupancy Type: .II - B, S Address: 14850 SW 132nd Terrace Type: E 3 A2, /, B, S I O : 67,800 Sq Ft t r ieaz Load: 2,360 Stories: 2 The plan review was performed under the State of Oregon Structural S edition; and the Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue Ordinance 9 Code eOSor e following information is required in order to complete the review �9 -00 1999 edition, The PREEIMI�.ARY REVIEW 1. Provide clarification on court yard/play area exiting where kindergarten and corridor exits_ OSSC 10063.5, 1007.3.11 C 2. Provide clarification on occupant load and ding from computer room with using this room as intervening room for. exiting. OSSC 1007 3.4, 10033.1,5 & Table 10-A is 3. Provide clarification on storage room under stairs is sprinkled. OSSC 904.2.4.3, 1003.3.3,9 4. Provide clarification on East covered play area exiting y OSSC 1006.3,5, 1007.3.11 where corridor exits_ 5. Provide clarification on glazing for fire restive system used for windows in the corridor. OSSC 10 043.4.3.2. 2, 713.8 & 9 6, Provide clarification on intervening room smoke detection system. OSSC 10073.4 7, Provide clarification on means of egress identification areas. OSSC 1003.2.8 & 1109.15 13.725 SW Hoff 6ivd., Tiggord, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 654 -2772 12/2812004 18 5032940827 EEA ARCHITECTS PAGE 05/05 181 L if 6 )0e) , 13: 1_ 5:c bb:� i—le,e1 TIGARD BUILDING DEPT PAGE 03/63 S_ Provide clarification on why corridors walls at play area exits are not 1 hour rated as required per OSSC 1004.3.4.3. 1005.3.1 (Opening are exempt per OSSC 1004.3.4.3.2 and Table 5-A.) 9, provide listed fire restive construction assemblies. 10, Provide masonry veneer design. 11. Provide clarification on manufacturer's information on walk -in cooIer/freezer showing approved by the State of Oregon, Oregon Administrative Rule 918-674 MECHANICAL 12. Review not included with this permit. Please provide an item by item response. Deferred submittals such as Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, Truss Joist Sho Draw charged a deferred submittal fee based on the valuation of the f � � tt a r Minimum fee shall be $200.00. Deferred items; portion of the work being dfezred, The Fire Alarms, • Fire Sprinklers When submitting revised drawings or additional information, please attach a copy of the enclosed City of Tigard, Letter of Transmittal. The letter of transmittal assists the City of Tigard in tracking and processing the documents. Respectfitlly, 7,2- Val Hierizel, Senior Plans Examiner f �• 1L/ L.3/ L JU4 11:41 3U.3L74YJi3L/ ttA AKU ItUI`J HAUL b1/ bi r . r r . .. MEMORANDUM 1 4 ti ill EEA ARCHITECTS P.C. ' 1230 SW FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 300 . i.? :', PORTLAND, OREGON 97204.3236 r t) \ + "+ 503.223,6963 /FAX 503.294.0827 f "/ �, TO: Val Menzel C 6 0 - -' December 23, 2004 Building Department - City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. k Tigard, Oregon 97223 C.)�� cc: Rick Rainone, Craig Markus FROM: EEA FAXED, PAGES / FAX NO_: (503) 598 1960 ❑.MAILED ❑ MESSENGERED SUBJECT: Plumbing Fixture Counts Permit Number: BUP2004 -00910 Per our phone conversation today, the plumbing fixture counts were figured per the following. Thank you for walking us through this calculation / conversation today, as we look forward to continued communication / problem — solving that we've enjoyed with Brian and yourself. Lower Floor Classrooms = 12,771 s.f. Main Floor Classrooms = 11,779 s.f. (Does include 2 Kindergarten and special ed) TOTAL PLUMBING NON - ACCESSORY AREA OF CONSIDERATION: 24,550 / 50 s.f. per occupant = 246 boys + 246 girls. A1.1 shows that we provided for 310 boys and 310 girls total The following were not included in. the areas above due to being accessory; Library, Computer, Music, High Needs, Activity spaces. The High Needs room A219 is accessory to Special Ed A216 because high needs students (usually have trouble using restrooms / behavioral / etc) are separated from Special Ed A216 when their behavior becomes more volatile. Activity spaces are immediately accessible from the group of classrooms they ' serve (doors between classrooms and activity space). The Activity spaces are used by the classroom occupants as the teacher sends 1 or 2 students into the Activity space to work on an exercise and return to the classroom. Activity spaces are not used by additional occupants from the classrooms in which they serve. We're under the impression that this issue is closed. Please call us if there is any other issue. Thank you for your time. • • • ' Page 1 of 1 • • • OFFICE COPY n WDY Structural • Civil Engineers `/ December 20, 2004 EEA Architects 1230 SW First Avenue, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97204 Attn: Sean Scott RE: Alberta Rider Elementary School SW 130th Avenue & Bull Mountain Road, Tigard, Oregon Permit #BUP2004 -00529 Plan Check Response / December 13, 2004 WDY, Inc. has completed the response to the structural comments of the plan review for the above mentioned project, issued by City of Tigard Building Department December 13, 2004. As you requested, we have enclosed 8 -1/2 x 11 copies of the drawing changes and the full size drawing revisions will be completed soon. Item 1: Per the drawings, 3500 psi concrete is only used for slabs on metal deck. In specification section 03300 part 2.09 item C2, the reference to structural slab, beams and columns is not applicable. Item 2: Specification section 03300 part 3.04 item D lists acceptable lap splice lengths "or as noted on the drawings ". Per the drawings, lap splices in walls and footings are to be 45 bar diameters. Item 3: All masonry design was based on f'm =2,600 psi. If CMU is substituted for brick, f'm =2,600 • psi is required. Specification section 04220 part 2.02 item B should be modified to reflect this requirement. Item 4: The library area is not a stack room so the code required live load is 60 psf (reading rooms). The floor framing design in this area is conservative. Item 5: Calculations for retaining walls 10a, 10b and 10c on S6.1 are on pages M8 through M11 of the original calculations. Calculations for the retaining wall at the elevator pit are on enclosed pages Al to A3. The basement wall will span horizontally to the side walls of the elevator which extend to the main floor (pg A3). The top of the wall is restrained by the slab on grade. The footing design is governed by sliding and a footing 10c/S6.3 by itself would have a sliding factor of safety of 1.15 (pg A5). The additional required sliding resistance is provided by the elevator slab weight and passive pressure on the south wall of the pit (pg A4). The drawings have been revised to clarify the slab thickness -below -the elevator (see enclosed SK -101). N h � E O V E DEC 2 i. 2604 CITY OF TIGARD 6443 SW Beaverton - Hillsdale Hwy, • Portland, OR 97221 • ph: 503.203.8111 • fx: 503.203.8 • • www.wdyi.com wy, suite 210 . com Alberta Rider Elementary School Structural Checksheet Response Page 2 of 4 Item 6: Enclosed calculation pages A6 to A8 show the worst case anchor bolt calculations using PCA document "Strength Design of Anchorage to Concrete ". Note: The alternate foundation plans on S3.4 will not be used. Item 7: A & B /S7.1: Calculation pages A9 to Al 1 are enclosed. C /S7.1: Calculation page BF -11 has been revised to match the drawings. D &E /S7.1: Calculation page BF -20 is enclosed (no change). Item 8: Calculation pages BF -2,3 & 5 are enclosed with clarification of loads and combinations shown. Item 9: Sectors A & B were designed to be seismically separated. The seismic joint has been continued through the main floor at grid 6 between J & L (see enclosed SK102 & SK103). Item 10: Calculations A25 to A32 enclosed. Details 25/S6.2, 3/S6.3 and 6/S6.8 have been revised accordingly. Item 11: Sheet S3.4 will not be used. The detail is incorrect. The anchor bolts are intended to be spaced at 3' -0" on center for the full length of the angle. Item 12: The wall above the library doors spans horizontal to the pilasters at grids 5 & 7 (original calculation page W19). The calculation for the doorjamb is enclosed (see page Al2). Per the structural notes, the cells at each jamb will have (2) #5 vertical. Item 13: Calculation pages Al 5 to Al 8 are enclosed. Item 14: Calculation page A13 is enclosed. Revised detail enclosed. Item 15: Revised detail enclosed. Item 16: Revised detail enclosed, the connections to the column are located at 4' -0" on center vertically. Item 17: The calculation for pilasters in details 21 & 22 on S6.1 is on page W19 of the original calculations. For architectural reasons these pilasters are now larger than required by design. Calculations for 27 & 29/S6.1 are shown on pages A19 to A24 (enclosed). Detail 29a has been revised accordingly. Pilaster 28/S6.1 has the same loading as 29b/S6.1 but is larger for architectural reasons. Item 18: Revised details enclosed Item 19: Revised details enclosed. 1ECE VED Item 20: Revised details enclosed. DEC 21 2004 Item 21: Revised details enclosed. CITY OF TIGARD Item 22: All outriggers are 3 x 3 tubes. The 3 inch channels are blocking member °s! bet'wee'n It si Alberta Rider Elementary School Structural Checksheet Response Page 3 of 4 Item 23: Calculation page A14 is enclosed. Item 24: Revised detail enclosed. Item 25: Detail 3/S6.9 has been revised to clarify the welding requirements. This connection supports only the self- weight of the tube. Item 26: See enclosed calculation sheet A4 and A5. Item 27: See enclosed calculations RF -16 to RF -18. Details as shown on sheet S3.3w from Grids A to C and Grids 6 and 7 show framing and attachments. Item 28: See enclosed calculation sheet RF -18. See SK -5 for plan revisions. Item 29: Due to roof framing revisions, RB -16 was not used see revised RF -2 and RF -8. Item 30: See revised calculations sheet RF -5. W21X57 is adequate. Item 31: See revised calculation sheet RF -6. Item 32: See revised calculation sheet RF -7. Item 33: See revised calculation sheet RF -9. Item 34: See revised calculation sheet RF -9 and added RB -23 shown on added calculation sheet RF -17. Item 35: See revised calculation sheet RF -10. Item 36: See revised calculation sheet RF -11. Item 37: See revised calculation sheet RF -15. Item 38: FJ -1 calculation shown on FF -3 is correct. A portion of the library framing was incorrectly labeled as FJ -1 on sheet FF -1. See enclosed calculation sheet FF -1 Item 39: See enclosed calculation sheet FF -7 see enclosed SK -4 for plan revisions. Item 40: Reference plan check item #4. Item 41: See revised calculation sheet FF -4. Item 42: See revised calculation sheet FF -5 RECEIVED Item 43: See enclosed calculation sheet FF -7. DEC 21 2004 Item 44: See revised calculation sheets FF -5 and 6. CITY OF TIGARD Item 45: See revised calculation sheet FF -6. BUILDING DIVISION • Alberta Rider Elementary School Structural Checksheet Response Page 4 of 4 Items #46 thru 54 will be completed per code and city requirements. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, WDY, INC. a /711/4/1 ,,/ //‘' Douglas E. Paola, P.E., S.E. Enclosure O332Opianchk4trO1 uoc R!CEDVEJ DEC 21 2004 CITY OF TIGARD BUILDING DIVISION 430PZoog- - 08 52 14 8 so/ 13 2.WD ref& Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: January 4, 2005 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan Notes taken by Gary Lampella, Building Official. Cornerstone agreed that they still needed CWS okay prior to issuance of the plumbing permit. A sign -off from Ray Miller Engineering is necessary for the remainder of the foundation permit. Three items remained for correction on the structural permit review. City Electrical staff agreed to the installation of under -slab conduit without the full electrical, permit being issued. The meeting was short, approximately fifteen minutes and the next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 11 at 2:00 p.m. in the Permit Center. A note about other activity last week, a letter was sent to Stephen Poage regarding the critical situation that existed due to the fact that the District had not yet secured a permit from Clean Water Services. A copy of that letter is attached. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 ( p-1 Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: January 11, 2005 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; Stephen Poage of Tigard/Tualatin School District; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Sue Ross The structural plan review has been completed and approved. Plans are ready for issuance. The foundation permit can be issued now and the underslab plumbing permit can be issued as soon as approval is received from Clean Water Services. Redlines were returned to Westlake from CWS. It was agreed that at this point with verbal approval from CWS that the city would proceed with issuance of the underslab plumbing permit. Pat attempted to contact Terry Keys from CWS for verbal approval . but he was not available. Pat will ask him to contact Brian Blalock with verbal approval and the plumbing permit can be issued at that time. The final profile for Bull Mountain Road will be worked up today as Mike White from the city is meeting with Pat and Bernard from Westlake. Significant progress is being made on right -of - ways and easements. Stephen Poage related to Craig that he needed the information regarding easements and right -of -ways for the school board meeting on the 20 of January. Also, a "Petition to Annex" will be sent to Mr. Poage for action. In all, the meeting was constructive and it seems the required conditions for Alberta Rider are moving along. The experience of cooperation between all entities is greatly appreciated. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 January 14, 2005 Stephen Poage Tigard - Tualatin School District 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: This letter is an important update regarding the Clean Water Services permit for the Alberta Rider Elementary School project. At our weekly meeting this Tuesday, the city was told the Clean Water Services permit was `ready to go' and could be . released by merely a telephone call from CWS to our Plans Examiner Supervisor, Brian Blalock. Brian received an email yesterday from Terry Keyes, Development Services Manager at Clean Water Services. He stated that the plans were not approved and the permit not ready to issue. He recommended the city not grant an on -site plumbing permit until an easement issue is addressed and the engineering plans from Westlake are ready to approve, with only minor redlines remaining. Terry also recommends no walls or other structures above ground -level be allowed until Westlake plans are approved and their connection permit issued. The two major issues Terry pointed out from the standpoint of CWS are: 1. Lack of a storm sewer easement at the storm sewer connection point with Summit Ridge. The easement from Summit Ridge will be to the City of Tigard, not to CWS; 2. Probable downstream capacity limitations for the runoff from the school property. Westlake will need to clarify the capacity issue to determine if on- site detention is needed. The permit was submitted to CWS on December 29, 2004, and the plan review time has been very quick. It is very important, however, that you are aware of what may be a critical holdup on the project's progression. The City of Tigard cannot issue further permits until Clean Water Services has had their requirements met and the permit issued. The city will continue to strive to help the project move along progressively but we must continue to follow the guidelines for ours and other entity policies and procedures. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director cc: Alberta Rider Project Team Members Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: January 18, 2005 Attendees: Craig Markus of Cornerstone; COT Staff Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Brian Blalock, Sue Ross The foundation plans have been issued. The permit from Clean Water Services has not yet been issued. The final profile for Bull Mountain Road is still needed in Engineering. The meeting lasted only a few minutes as there was not much new activity for anyone to report. The next meeting will be next Tuesday, January 25 at 2:00 at the Permit Center. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: January 25, 2005 Attendees: Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Stephen Poage of TTSD; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Brian Blalock and Sue Ross. Stephen Poage is continuing to work on the acquisition of easements and right -of -ways for the project and stated that portion of the project is moving along. Gus Duenas, City Engineer, sent a letter to the school district and Arbor Summit representatives suggesting they use the same engineer to work together on the Bull Mountain Road construction. No response to that letter had been received by meeting time. Engineering has received the plans for J Street and 132 Avenue and are reviewing those. It is still critical for them to receive approvable plans for Bull Mountain Road. Once this has been achieved, and the easements and right -of -ways in place, the construction portion can move beyond the footing /foundation stage. Robinson Construction is in the process of pouring the lower foundation and will have work through approximately next Wednesday, February 2. In order for the undersiab plumbing and electrical permits to be issued and work to be done in those disciplines, it is necessary to secure the CWS permit. That permit was submitted to CWS on December 29. Cornerstone Management, representing the school district, is coordinating with CWS to secure the permit as soon as possible. Brian Blalock will contact Terry Keyes at Clean Water Services to offer any help or information they may possibly need from the city to get the permit approved and issued. The city does not want to see construction progress being held up, and at this point the CWS permit seems to be the stumbling block. Our next meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 1 at the Permit Center Conference Room #1. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 Alberta Rider Elementary School Update February 25, 2005 Tigard- Tualatin School District requested Conditional Use approval to construct the 67,000 square foot proposed Alberta Rider Elementary School. The Land Use decision was approved on July 12, 2004 by the Hearings Officer, and appealed by an adjacent property owner on August 24 due to various issues. The appeal was withdrawn on September 10 and the Hearings Officer's final order approving the school became final on September 10, 2004. Alberta Rider had 48 conditions of approval. (copy of conditions attached) Due to complex issues surrounding the development and construction of Alberta Rider Elementary School, Jim Hendryx felt it would show good intention to begin weekly meetings that involved the representatives of the School District, Management Company (Cornerstone), Contractor (Robinson), Engineer (Westlake), and the City of Tigard staff involved in the project. Weekly meetings began December 8, 2004 with the purpose to clear up questions and frustrations and to help establish a foundation for clear communication and cooperation between our entities to make this upcoming construction process a positive project. At the time, there were quite a few outstanding items to be completed for the project prior to Site Permit Issuance, Public Facilities Improvement permit (PFI from Engineering) issuance and any construction. During a meeting in early November, the City agreed to let the school proceed as follows: • Plans and permit applications could be submitted to the Building Division (this procedure is not usually allowed until certain conditions are met) • Although the submitted permits would go through the plan review process until approved to issue, the school was given approval to go ahead with some limited site work: • preparation of site prior to site permit issuance • rock the access road(s) and approximately 50 -feet around the building site footprint; • A Hold Harmless Agreement would be immediately submitted to the City of Tigard by the Tigard/Tualatin School District, covering any and all work and activity on the site. (This agreement was received 12/16/04 - copy of agreement attached) Alberta Rider Elementary School Update February 25, 2005 Page 2 • The Parks Systems Development Charge was calculated and pre -paid (allowing the school to avoid large 1/1/05 increase) • Annexation agreement would be submitted to the city. This was approved by the School Board on December 9, 2004. As of this date (2/25/05), annexation submittal has NOT been made. To assist the school district in constructing Alberta Rider in a timely manner, these approvals were done out of development sequence as a courtesy to the school district, and also due to the tremendous amount of activity on Bull Mountain and easement and right -of -way requirements that involve not only the school project but other projects approved in the area. • Due to this reliance on other projects (Arbor Summit I and II, Summit Ridge, Bella Vista) for some of the required right -of -ways and easements, the City has strived to make concessions for the school to have a limited amount of construction underway prior to actual approval of certain conditions. Permits that have been issued in this consideration are Site, Footing /Foundation, Phase I Structural, and temporary Electrical service. Contractors installed and buried underslab plumbing without permits or inspections. A CWS permit was finally issued and the plumbing permit picked up February 15, 2005. • Suggestions for better coordination and things that potentially will save the school money have come up and acted upon. Stephen Poage agreed, along with West Hills Development, to bid the Bull Mountain Road street improvements as one document and hire one contractor (as opposed to the original two) to do the work. This alone has the potential of saving many dollars and was a suggestion from the City's Engineering Department. It also allowed the City to go ahead with the issuance of a Phase I Structural permit, which kept the contractor from having to lay off his crew. (copy of agreement attached) Meetings that were continuing weekly and were successful at solving the 'What's Next ? ?" questions have been unattended by any representative of the school district's project. They have virtually ignored meeting notices and telephone calls. The meetings were progressive and accomplished keeping the lines of communication open between the City and the School District. • Due to confusion by a rep of Cornerstone Management, they thought they were being charged for these meetings because of a billing from Engineering. That is when correspondence was sent by Stephen Poage ordering his `team' to stop attending the meetings. (copy of letter attached). The charges are for Engineering services from the start of the project to the present. Information explaining all charges were personally delivered to Stephen Poage at the TTSD office. (copy of explanation attached) Kim McMillan will present what items still need to be submitted to the Engineering Department to continue the progress of the school. April 19, 2005 Steve Poage Director of Capital Projects Tigard- Tualatin School District 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: This letter serves to review fees and Conditions of Approval that are outstanding for the Alberta Rider Elementary School Project. I am attaching a current listing of fees outstanding, along with remaining Conditions of Approval. The building permit for fire/life safety portion of the building has been ready to issue since March 18. However, as you can see by the attached Conditions of Approval, there are still 14 conditions that need to be met prior to issuance of further permits. It is important to state that you were permitted to proceed with construction with the understanding that your conditions would be met as soon as practical. Several months have gone by without progress toward meeting all of the applicable conditions. The city has cooperated to the fullest extent to allow your contractor to go forward with certain aspects of construction on the site. An extensive amount of construction has proceeded ahead of normal permit sequence and in some cases without permit. We are coming to a point that the public facilities plans must be completed. This requires submission of all construction and permanent easements and right of way dedications. We want to see the project continue forward and not be delayed. We had been holding successful weekly meetings for project status and I encourage your participation to attend a meeting I have scheduled for Tuesday, May 10 at 2:00 p.m. to review where we are at with the project. The City will notify via email all those who previously attended with the same invitation. Steve, I have always strived to ensure good communications throughout the project. However, I was disappointed to see the article in the Oregonian stating that the school opening is "delayed by a dispute with the city over a nearby road and permit problems ". I am sorry that the School Board members were informed that was the case as we know the problems with securing permits are more complicated than merely stating the City has held the project up. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director cc: Alberta Rider Project Team Members On Friday, April 22, 2005 at approximately 9:3o a.m. a site visit was made to Alberta Rider Elementary School project site by Jim Hendryx, City of Tigard Community .Development Director, and Gary Lampella, City of Tigard Building Official. Mr. Lampella reports that he observed work being performed that had yet to be permitted by the City of Tigard. The building permit application issued to Robinson Construction was to construct a structural shell only. However, Mr. Lampella observed structural work being done within the interior and at the exterior, including non- structural stud walls and HVAC work. This scope of work was not covered in the structural shell permit. Mr. Lampella also states that the contractors are now doing exterior site waterlines without the benefit of a permit. He states he verbally instructed the foreman of the site (Dave Haggard) to stop any work on non - permitted areas. May 20, 2005 Jer Pratton, ED D Tigard - Tualatin School District 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Jer: This letter is regarding Condition No. 13 of the Alberta Rider Elementary School land use approval; more specifically, the condition which requires elimination of the east Rider driveway off of Bull Mountain Road. A meeting was held several weeks ago and a discussion ensued regarding this condition; no conclusion was reached at that time. I have learned, however, that if the School District is considering an appeal for the driveway to remain, it would be a very long and complicated process. First and foremost, the appeal period has long expired. Because the driveway was decided as part of the Conditional Use application, the condition is part of a Type III Hearings Officer decision. We cannot modify that decision. In order to modify the Hearings Officer decision, a complete hearing process, including pre -app meeting, neighborhood meeting, application and hearing review by the Hearings Officer would be required. The School District used this driveway closing in argument for approval of their emergency access which is approximately 80 feet away. Should the emergency access go away once the school is completed, there are separate issues regarding the Rider driveway. It would fall under an adjustment to 18.705 H. Access Management Standards, which requires a 200 -foot separation which may not be achievable in this case. There are clear review criteria for this adjustment, including that there are no other alternative access points and it is not possible to share access. As a result, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to meet the approval criteria. Also consideration would have to be the street access to the Alpine View Subdivision as well as other driveways across the street. Jer Pratton, ED D Alberta Rider Driveway Condition Page 2 May 20, 2005 To seek an adjustment would be a Major Modification to the Conditional Use Permit approved by the Hearings Officer for CUP 2003 - 00012. This would be a very long process without guarantee of approval. Should you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director /sr cc: Stephen Poage, Tigard - Tualatin School District Craig Prosser, Interim City Manager Dick Brewersdorff, Planning Manager Kim McMillan, Private Development Manager Meeting Date: December 8, 2004 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Brian Blalock, Mike White, Dick Bewersdorff. Jim began the meeting relating some activities of the previous week. Contractor would like to have a foundation permit by Friday. Ray Miller may be done with the FIRST review by Monday but there may . be plan review conditions and corrections to meet. GL stated he had told Steve Poage there would be no commitment as far as a date the plan review would be done, but it would be soon. A site review letter was sent out by COT on December 7, 2004 Critical is the Hold Harmless letter, yet to be sent by the school district. Conclusions were: The city must be satisfied with response to the plan review letter from Ray Miller and until those issues are satisfied, no footing /foundation permit will be issued. Ultimately, Ray will determine when is okay to issue the footing /foundation permit. • December 10, 2004 Steve Poage Tigard - Tualatin School District 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: A meeting was held Wednesday, December 8, 2004 between representatives of Cornerstone, Robinson Construction, and the City regarding Alberta Rider Elementary School. The purpose was to clear up some questions and frustrations and to help establish a foundation for clear communication and cooperation between our entities to make this upcoming construction process a positive project. The meeting was progressive and we agreed to meeting weekly for the time being to keep that line of communication open. Daily activity with the project will be logged and then a weekly update written and copied to the interested parties. Attached is this week's update. You will continue to receive copies of the update from our Permit Coordinator, Sue Ross. Sue will be the main contact for any questions, concerns, and submittals to the city. She will either process or distribute necessary documentation to Engineering or Planning during the land use process while conditions continue to be met. Sue's direct telephone number is 503 - 718 -2453. Regarding your inquiry of the actual Parks Systems Development Fee, the fee is based upon the number of employees that will be employed at Alberta Rider. Rick Rainone stated 40 employees, so the fee will be calculated on that figure. Currently, the fee is $131.00 per employee x 40 equaling $5,240.00. The City Council has an agenda item this month for a significant increase in Parks SDC's. The increase is proposed to be higher than the normal end of the year increase. I recognize that it is prior to annexation, but I do encourage the School District to pay the Parks SDC prior to final occupancy as the increase will go into effect January 1, 2005. In the matter of the Hold Harmless agreement we are requiring before work progresses, I am attaching a sample format for the School District to follow, personalizing the form to fit the needs of the project. It is imperative that we receive this Hold Harmless agreement at the earliest convenience. Feel free to have your legal counsel contact Gary Firestone at 503 - 306 -0258 concerning the • project or the language of the Hold Harmless agreement, and do not hesitate to contact me with any questions during this project as we look forward to a positive and successful school development. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director attachments cc: Alberta Rider Project Team Members Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: December 15, 2004 Attendees: Rick Rainone and Craig Markus of Cornerstone; Dave Haggard of Robinson . Construction; Bernard Smith and Pat Tortora of Westlake Consultants; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan, Brian Blalock, Mike White, Dick Bewersdorff. Jim began the meeting relating some activities of the previous week. Kim noted that the 'J' Street plans had been received and were being reviewed. She stated she needed an engineer's estimate for work at 132 Street, the east/west street (not yet named), and the intersection at 133 and Bull Mountain Road in order to bond. Also discussed were the tree removal issue and the waterline easement for Alberta's property. Approvable plans for the Bull Mountain frontage are needed, but Kim did not feel that issue will hold up any issuance of footing permits. Brian and Gary discussed the plan review conditions that had been sent from Ray Miller. Revisions that are necessary as stated on the plan review letter are crucial in order to issue a Footing /Foundation permit. Ray Miller will ultimately determine when to release that permit. Rick Rainone stated that the two items they are anxious to secure are the footing /foundation permits and the underslab plumbing permit. In addition, the underslab electrical is being reviewed by the Building Division. The Transmittal form used by the Building Division was discussed and noted the importance of using this when revisions /documents are being submitted. Sue will attach a copy of this form to email going out to development team. A Hold Harmless form was delivered to the school district this week and it's return is critical. The Dedication Deed for right -of -way was returned to the School District this week for recordation at Washington County. There was discussion regarding outstanding land use conditions. Conclusions were: • Fill /Cut/Slope compaction tests will be submitted to the city from Brian Duvall at USA. • Site permit, site utility permit, underslab plumbing and electrical permits are either under review or ready to issue once plan review conditions are met. • Footing /Foundation permit will be issued upon compliance with plan review conditions. • The next weekly meeting will be held Tuesday, December 21 at 2:00 p.m. in conference room #4 at the Permit Center. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: December 28, 2004 . Attendees: Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan Work is being done and inspections being performed on Gridline `J' footings. Robinson will be ready for more footing /foundation permits next week. Gary will contact Ray Miller to check the status of plan review revisions allowing further permits to be issued. The under -slab plumbing permit was discussed. Dave will submit the schematics later today that are required and the permit will possibly be ready for issuance tomorrow, Wednesday. He was informed that the sewer fee will have to be paid to CWS and the receipt brought in when he pulls the plumbing permit. There was discussion about how far the building can go on before the PFI permit is issued. Kim stated that she still needs ROW for 132 & Batterson; slope and construction easements and ROW for Bull Mountain Road and 133 She stated that the Bull Mountain Road frontage plans look good but she does need approvable plans for the remaining public improvements. It was agreed by the city and Robinson representatives present that construction on the site would not go beyond anything coming up and out of the ground until the Engineering issues are submitted and accepted. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 4 at 2:00 p.m. in the Permit Center. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 Notes: Alberta Rider Elementary School Weekly Review Meeting Date: December 28, 2004 Attendees: Dave Haggard of Robinson Construction; COT Staff Jim Hendryx, Sue Ross, Gary Lampella, Kim McMillan Work is being done and inspections being performed on Gridline `J' footings. Robinson will be ready for more footing /foundation permits next week. Gary will contact Ray Miller to check the status of plan review revisions allowing further permits to be issued. The under -slab plumbing permit was discussed. Dave will submit the schematics later today that are required and the permit will possibly be ready for issuance tomorrow, Wednesday. He was informed that the sewer fee will have to be paid to CWS and the receipt brought in when he pulls the plumbing permit. There was discussion about how far the building can go on before the PFI permit is issued. Kim stated that she still needs ROW for 132 & Batterson; slope and construction easements and ROW for Bull Mountain Road and 133 She stated that the Bull Mountain Road frontage plans look good but she does need approvable plans for the remaining public improvements. It was agreed by the city and Robinson representatives present that construction on the site would not qo beyond anything coming up and out of the ground until the Engineering issues are submitted and accepted. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 4 at 2:00 p.m. in the Permit Center. Prepared by Sue Ross, 503 - 718 -2453 December 29, 2004 Steve Poage Tigard - Tualatin School District 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: A critical situation has been brought to my attention today that has the potential to compromise the continued construction at Alberta Rider Elementary School. I was notified that plans for the private sewer line have never been submitted to Clean Water Services (CWS) for the Alberta Rider project. There are two crucial services that CWS must conduct. One, they must review and approve the plans to issue permits for the sewer lateral connection from the school to the public sewer in Summit Ridge. They must also review and approve plans for the storm and sewer lines to be constructed in the public streets (132 and Batterson Street). These plans are currently under review by CWS. As you recognize, the city has cooperated to the fullest extent to allow your contractor to go forward with certain aspects of construction on the site. Extensive site work, footings and retaining walls have been allowed to proceed ahead of normal permit sequence. We are coming to a point that the public facilities plans must be completed. This requires submission of all construction and permanent easements and right of way dedications. In addition, without the proper permits from CWS, we cannot issue plumbing permits or continue to allow further construction activities beyond what has been permitted above (ie foundations, etc.). We want to see the project continue forward and not stop. We continue to meet weekly and I encourage your participation to ensure good communications continue throughout the project. I will continue to provide notes from the meetings to keep you informed of the progress being made. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director cc: Alberta Rider Project Team Members a quick memo To Steve Poage.... ���� N i ���P�lj + Hi Steve....attached is the Dedication Deed for Bull Mountain Road which has gone thru Engineering, has been signed by our City Engineer and is now ready for you to submit to the county for recordation. Once it is recorded, please submit a copy of it to me so I can sign off that condition and get copy in the file. Thanks ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CUP 2003 -00012 THE FOLLOWING PLANNING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SITE PERMIT: 1. The applicant shall place the following note on all construction documents: "The City of Tigard Noise Ordinance prohibits construction activity in excess of 40 decibels between 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday. 2. The applicant shall submit a final tree removal and protection plan that identifies the trees to be removed and the trees to be protected. Mitigation will then be based on the final tabulation of trees removed to those retained, per Section 18.790.030. 3. The applicant shall provide the City Arborist with a construction sequence including installation and removal of tree protection devices, clearing, grading and paving. 4. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. 5. The applicant shall submit permit drawings that clearly indicate the visual clearance areas for all intersections and access points along with recommendations by the applicant's engineer to achieve clear vision and adequate site distance. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SITE PERMIT: MET 6. A Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit is required for this project to cover street improvements and any other work in the public right -of- way. Eight (8) sets of detailed public improvement plans shall be submitted for review to the Engineering Department. NOTE: These plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to the public improvements. Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall and at the city's webpage www.ci.tigard.or.us. MET 7. The PFI permit plan submittal shall include the exact legal name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be designated as the "Permittee" and who will provide the financial assurance for the public improvements. For example, specifij if the entity is a Corporation, LLC, limited partnership, etc. Also specify the state within which the entity is incorporated and provide the name of the corporate contact person. Failure to provide accurate information to the Engineering Department will delay processing of project documents. 8. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of Bull Mountain Road to increase the right -of -way to 37 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right -of -way centerline. The dedication document shall be on city forms. Instructions are available from the, Engineering Department. MET 9. The applicant shall submit construction plans to the Engineering Department as part of the Public Facility Improvement permit, which indicate that they will construct a half - street improvement along the frontage of Bull Mountain Road. The improvements adjacent to this site shall include A. City standard pavement section for a Collector street from curb to centerline equal to 23 feet; B. Pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; C. Concrete curb, or curb and gutter as needed; D. Storm drainage, including any off -site storm drainage necessary to convey surface and /or subsurface runoff; E. Six-foot concrete sidewalk with a planter strip; F. Street trees in the planter strip spaced per TDC requirements. Species selection shall be as recommended by the City Arborist. Such trees shall be installed prior to final building inspection. G. Street striping; H. Streetlight layout by applicant's engineer, to be approved by City Engineer; I. Underground utilities; J. Street signs, if applicable; K. Driveway apron, if applicable; L. Adjustments in vertical and /or horizontal alignment to construct SW Bull Mountain Road in a safe manner, as approved by the Engineering Department. MET 10. The applicant's plans shall show installation of bicycle striping, markers, legends and mini - arrows along the Bull Mountain Road frontage. �i. Prior to commencing onsite improvements, the applicant's design and construction plans shall include the left -turn lane with 100-foot of storage for west- bound traffic on Bull Mountain Road at the intersection of 133rd Avenue, if the design has not already been completed by others. (Note: Need assurances by Venture Properties). 12. Right -of -way shall be dedicated to the public for at least a cul -de -sac termination of the "F" Street stub on the site as approved by the city. The applicant's Public Facility Improvement permit construction drawings shall indicate that improvements, including at least traffic control devices, concrete sidewalks, driveways aprons, curbs, asphaltic concrete pavement, street trees, streetlights and underground utilities, shall be installed to complete a permanent termination of F Street as a cul -de -sac on the site. Improvements shall be designed and constructed to local street standards. This condition shall not preclude and expressly authorizes dedication and improvement of an extension of F Street from the south edge of the site along the west edge of the site to the east -west public access road to dimensions and standards approved by the city. MET 13. The applicant's plan shall show the east Rider driveway eliminated. MET 14. The applicant's plans shall show the proposed access onto Bull Mountain Road as an emergency only access. That access shall be gated or otherwise improved to prevent general public motor vehicle access, but shall be accessible to emergency services providers, pedestrians and bicyclists. The access may be used for general public motor vehicle access only during an emergency or when otherwise approved for that purpose by the Planning Manager. Case Note: No emergency access proposed. 15. Deleted 16. A profile of Bull Mountain Road shall be required, extending 300 feet either side of the subject site showing the existing grade and proposed future grade. 17. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the Public Facility Improvement permit plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. 19. The applicant shall provide a public sanitary sewer main from the intersection of 133rd Avenue and the new east -west street to the stub shown in F Street on the approved Summit Ridge subdivision plans. Note: Assurance required by Venture. 20. The applicant shall extend the public storm sewer in the east -west street to the intersection with 133rd Avenue. Note: Assurance required by Venture. 21. Prior to construction, the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation of Clean Water Services (CWS) approval of the proposed storm sewer system for review by the city (Kim McMillan). 22. Any extension of public water lines shall be shown on the proposed Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit construction drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Water Department, as part of the Engineering Department plan review. NOTE: An estimated 12% of the water system costs must be on deposit with the Water Department prior to approval of the PFI permit plans from the Engineering Department and construction of public water lines. 23. The applicant's plans shall be revised to show a new, public .12 -inch line connecting to the 10 -inch line in Bull Mountain Road. This 12 -inch line will need to be public in order to serve properties beyond the borders of this site. The 12 -inch line needs to be connected to the waterline shown in F Street on the approved Summit Ridge plans. A public waterline also needs to be extended the full length of the new east -west street, from the site to 133rd Avenue. A minimum 15 -foot public easement will be required where the waterline is located outside of the public right -of -way. 24. The applicant shall provide an on -site water quality facility as required by Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (adopted by Resolution and Order No. 00 -7). Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Kim McMillan) for review and approval prior to issuance of the site permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. The applicant shall also provide the City with approval from CWS for the water quality facility. 25. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit drawings. The plan shall conform to the "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Design and Planning Manual, February 2003 edition ". 28. The applicant shall obtain a 1200 -C General Permit issued by the City of Tigard pursuant to ORS 468.740 and the Federal Clean Water Act. 29. The applicant shall submit preliminary sight distance certification for all driveways and intersections related to this development. Included with the preliminary certification shall be a detailed list of improvements required to produce adequate sight distance. 37. Prior to submittal of permits, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee according • to the rate at the time of payment. Contact Shirley Treat, Engineering. • THE FOLLOWING PLANNING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 32. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a final lighting plan that indicates the lighting levels for the pathways on site. Ensure that all lighting on site will not cause glare (measured as 1 foot candle at the property line) to adjacent properties. This plan shall also address glare onto abutting properties from outdoor field lighting, if applicable. Lights shall be generally oriented towards the school building and not toward the abutting properties. The lighting plan shall include photometric data to demonstrate compliance with the requirement. 33. Screening shall be provided on all sides of the project that abut residential property. This requirement may be waived for those properties where the applicant has secured written authorization from these abutting property owners to forgo this screening. 34. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan that shows: A. Street trees along both sides of West Access Road and one side of SW Bull Mountain Road, and the F Street cul -de -sac (or the eastside of an extended F Street). Species selection shall be as recommended by the City Forester and planted at the required spacing. Such trees shall be installed prior to final building inspection. B. Additional screening (vegetation or a sigh obscuring fence) along the western edge of the bus loading area and the eastern edge of the parking area. C. Dimensions of the landscape islands to demonstrate that tree planting areas have a minimum three feet of width. 35. The applicant shall satisfy the requirements of Section I of Washington County's Land Use and Transportation Department's letters dated June 3 and May 25, 2004, and provide written confirmation from the country that their requirements have been satisfied. 36. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate how Section 18.755.050 compliance will be attained. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 38. During issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall pay the standard water quantity fee (fee amounts will be the latest approved by CWS). THE FOLLOWING PLANNING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT OR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION /OCCUPANCY: 30. Deleted. Refer to condition #48. 31. Lights and an amplified sound system for the playfield shall not be provided. 39. Applicant shall obtain annexation approval. 40. The applicant shall ensure that the recommendations of the project arborist regarding tree care have been implemented. 41. The applicant shall satisfy the requirements of Section II of Washington County's Land Use and Transportation Department's letters dated June 3 and May 24, 2004. 47. Prior to placement of any signs on site, the applicant shall apply for a sign permit and supply staff with the appropriate plans to verify compliance with TDC Chapter 18.780. 48. At any time after the school begins operations, if the planning manager finds that the noise level at the south property line of the school exceeds an Leq of 6o dBA, he or she may require the applicant to install noise attenuation measures to reduce noise levels to 6o dBA or may schedule of public hearing before the hearings officer to consider whether such requirements should be imposed. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT OR PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION/OCCUPANCY: 18. During construction, the applicant shall provide connection of proposed buildings to the public sanitary sewage system. A connection permit is required to connect to the existing public sanitary sewer system. (Note: Need assurances by Venture Properties). 26. A final grading plan shall be submitted showing the existing and proposed contours. The plan shall detail the provisions for surface drainage of all impervious areas, and show that they will be graded to insure that surface drainage is directed to the street or a public storm drainage system approved by the Engineering Department. For situations where the back portions of the lot drains away from a street and toward adjacent lots, appropriate private storm drainage lines shall be provided to sufficiently contain and convey runoff. 27. The applicant shall incorporate the recommendations from the submitted geotechnical report by URS Corporation, dated July 2003, into the final grading plan. The geotechnical engineer shall be employed by the applicant throughout the entire construction period to ensure that all grading, including cuts and fills, are constructed in accordance with the approved plan and Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 42. The applicant shall complete the required public improvements, obtain conditional acceptance from the City, and provide a one -year maintenance assurance for said improvements. 43. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW Bull Mountain Road underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $35 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, the amount will be $20,667.50 and it shall be paid prior to final building inspection. 44. The ensure compliance with Clean Water Services design and construction standards, the applicant shall employ the design engineer responsible for the design and specifications of the private water quality facility to perform construction and visual observation of the water quality facility for compliance with the design and specifications. These inspections shall be made at significant stages, and at completion of the construction. Prior to final building inspection, the design engineer shall provide the City of Tigard Inspection Supervisor (Hap Watkins, Building Division) with written confirmation that the water quality facility is in compliance with the design and specifications. 45. The applicant's geotechnical engineer shall submit a final report to the Building Division that indicates all grading work on this site was inspected by said geotechnical engineer, and that it was completed in accordance with Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 46. Final sight distance certification for all intersections and driveways associated with this development shall be provided by the applicant's engineer. Planning Staff Contact: Morgan Tracy Engineering Staff Contact: Kim McMillan Permits Coordinator: Sue Ross MEMORANDUM n„,A,h TO: Jim Hendryx Kim McMillan Brian Blalock Mike White Morgan Tracy FROM: Sue Ross, Permit Coordinator DATE: May 15, 2006 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY UPDATE As the conditions of approval show, there are quite a few outstanding items to be completed for this project prior to site permit issuance, PFI issuance and any construction. During a meeting held Thursday, November 04, 2004, some of the following items were agreed upon concerning Alberta Rider Elementary School: • The address fee for the project has been transferred and an address assigned to the school site: 14850 S.W. 132 Terrace. • Now that the address is assigned, plans and permit applications in my area will be submitted to the Building Division to go into the plan review queue. • Although the submitted permits (Building - related permits and PFI permit) will go through the plan review process until approval is reached, the school has been given approval to go ahead with some limited site work, to include • preparation of site prior to site permit issuance • rock the access road(s) and approximately 50 -feet around the building site footprint; • All tree removal and erosion control plans are to be first approved before work is done; • A Hold Harmless Agreement is to be submitted to the City of Tigard by the Tigard/Tualatin School District, covering any and all work and activity on the site. • Parks Systems Development Charges may be calculated and pre -paid. Should you have any questions regarding the above items, please let me know and will get clarification for you. Thanks! � x.... II CITY OF TIGARD FACT SHEET 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Contact: Sue Ross, (503) 718 -2453 DATE: April 28, 2005 TOPIC: Alberta Rider Elementary School Project PURPOSE: A meeting to review the remaining conditions of approval for CUP2003- 00012 in an attempt to resolve them and move forward with the permit issuance and construction of the school. PRESENT: Stephen Poage, TTSD; Jim Hendryx, Kim McMillan, Gary Lampella, Sue Ross, City of Tigard. Once the meeting began at 9:0o a.m., the following conditions of approval were reviewed and discussed. The result of discussion is listing under each applicable condition. THE FOLLOWING PLANNING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OFA SITE PERMIT: 2. The applicant shall submit a final tree removal and protection plan that identifies the trees to be removed and the trees to be protected. Mitigation will then be based on the final tabulation of trees removed to those retained, per Section 18.790.030. Result: This plan was on the construction plans submitted to Building Department last November. A separate plan showing the tree removal and protection plan needs to be submitted to the Planning Department to meet this condition. 4. The applicant shall notify the City Arborist when tree protection measures are in place so that he may verify that the measures will function properly prior to construction. Result: A letter was sent regarding the erosion control and tree protection plan in place. Sue will notify Matt Stine to please site inspect and report to sign off this condition. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SITE PERMIT: 8. Additional right -of -way shall be dedicated to the public along the frontage of Bull Mountain Road to increase the right -of -way to 37 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right -of -way centerline. The dedication document shall be on city forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. Result: Stephen Poage stated that Craig Markus was working on this Bull Mountain Road right -of -way. A copy of the right -of -way with the county recordation number needs to be submitted to Kim. 10. The applicant's plans shall show installation of bicycle striping, markers, legends and mini - arrows along the Bull Mountain Road frontage. Result: Kim will verify plan details. 13. The applicant's plan shall show the east Rider driveway eliminated. Result: Stephen Poage stated that Mrs. Rider is not comfortable with the elimination of her driveway. Kim offered to meet with her to come up with some alternatives. Stephen will contact Ed Murphy to either design an acceptable alternative or make a case for an adjustment. Access Spacing Standard, refer to code chapter 187.05 14. The applicant's plans shall show the proposed access onto Bull Mountain Road as an emergency only access. That access shall be gated or otherwise improved to prevent general public motor vehicle access, but shall be accessible to emergency services providers, pedestrians and bicyclists. The access may be used for general public motor vehicle access only during an emergency or when otherwise approved for that purpose by the Planning Manager. Case Note: No emergency access proposed. Result: Once the construction easements and right -of -way copies are submitted to the city (Kim McMillan), the PFI permit for 132nd can be issued and this condition signed off The construction and acceptance of 132nd will eliminate the need for Bull Mountain Road (emergency) access. 17. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the Public Facility Improvement permit plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. Result: This condition is tied to 132nd and Batterson Road. Kim will verify information in the 132nd package. 29. The applicant shall submit preliminary sight distance certification for all driveways and intersections related to this development. Included with the preliminary certification shall be a detailed list of improvements required to produce adequate sight distance. Result: Kittleson is preparing certification. 37. Prior to submittal of permits, the applicant shall pay an addressing fee according to the rate at the time of payment. Contact Shirley Treat, Engineering. Result: This fee has been paid. Sue will sign off condition. THE FOLLOWING PLANNING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 32. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a final lighting plan that indicates the lighting levels for the pathways on site. Ensure that all lighting on site will not cause glare (measured as 1 foot candle at the property line) to adjacent properties. This plan shall also address glare onto abutting properties from outdoor field lighting, if applicable. Lights shall be generally oriented towards the school building and not toward the abutting properties. The lighting plan shall include photometric data to demonstrate compliance with the requirement. 33. •Screening shall be provided on all sides of the project that abut residential property. This requirement may be waived for those properties where the applicant has secured written authorization from these abutting property owners to forgo this screening. 34. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan that shows: A. Street trees along both sides of West Access Road and one side of SW Bull Mountain Road, and the F Street cul -de -sac (or the eastside of an extended F Street). Species selection shall be as recommended by the City Forester and planted at the required spacing. Such trees shall be installed prior to final building inspection. B. Additional screening (vegetation or a sigh obscuring fence) along the western edge of the bus loading area and the eastern edge of the parking area. C. Dimensions of the landscape islands to demonstrate that tree planting areas have a minimum three feet of width. Result: Conditions 32, 33, and 34 will have plans (Westlake ?) forwarded to Planning (Morgan Tracy) to meet these requirements. 35. The applicant shall satisfy the requirements of Section I of Washington County's Land Use and Transportation Department's letters dated June 3 and May 25, 2004, and provide written confirmation from the country that their requirements have been satisfied. Result: After the streets are built, assure Washington County approval and submit copy of such approval to Kim McMillan. Sue will get copies of letters referenced in previous mail and submit to Stephen Poage. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: 38. During issuance of the building permits, the applicant shall pay the standard water quantity fee (fee amounts will be the latest approved by CWS). Result: CWS Permit indicates payment. Sue will sign -off this condition. All agreed that the timeframe is very important at this point for completion and sign -off of these conditions and may be accomplished within a week or so. Should you have any additions, deletions or discrepancies to these notes, please notify Sue Ross as soon as possible. Thank you. November 9, 2004 Steve Lowder Tigard- Tualatin School District , 6960 S.W. Sandburg Street Tigard OR 97223 Dear Steve: At a meeting held Thursday, November 4, 2004 between representatives of the School District and the City, it was noted that the Alberta Rider Elementary School project has quite a few outstanding items to be completed prior to site permit issuance, PFI issuance and any construction. However, at the meeting the following items were agreed upon in order to begin the construction process: • The address for the project has been assigned to the school site: 14850 S.W. 132 Terrace. • Plans and permit applications have been submitted to the Building Division. These will go into the plan review queue. • Although the submitted permits (building - related permits and PFI permit) will go through the plan review process until approval is reached, the school has been given approval to proceed with some limited site work, including preparation of site prior to site permit issuance, placing rock on the access road(s) and placing rock approximately 50 -feet around the building site footprint; • All tree removal and erosion control plans shall be submitted and approved before any on -site work begins; • A Hold Harmless Agreement will be submitted prior to any site work to the City of Tigard by the Tigard/Tualatin School District, covering any and all work and activity on the site. • Parks Systems Development Charges may be calculated and pre -paid. The items listed above will enable the project to move forward while the conditions of approval for the land use are being met. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions during this project as we look forward to a positive and successful school development. Sincerely, James N.P. Hendryx, Community Development Director cc: Steve Poage Bill Monahan 4111 CITY OF TIGARD FACT SHEET 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Contact: Sue Ross, (503) 718 -2453 DATE: May 13, 2005 TOPIC: Alberta Rider Elementary School Project PURPOSE: Update the conditions necessary to issue building permit COPY Via Email: Stephen Poage, TTSD; Jim Hendryx, Kim McMillan, Gary Lampella, Sue Ross, City of Tigard. This serves as an update of remaining condition status in order to issue the building permit for Alberta Rider Elementary School. We are down to six remaining on this list, all Engineering. THE FOLLOWING ENGINEERING CONDITIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE MET PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SITE PERMIT: 10. The applicant's plans shall show installation of bicycle striping, markers, legends and mini - arrows along the Bull Mountain Road frontage. Result: Should be complete...Kim will verify plan details. 13. The applicant's plan shall show the east Rider driveway eliminated. Result: Stephen Poage stated that Mrs. Rider is not comfortable with the elimination of her driveway. Kim o to meet with her to come up with some alternatives. Stephen will contact Ed Murphy to either design an acceptable alternative or make a case for an adjustment. Access Spacing Standard, refer to code chapter 187.05. UPDATE: The City Planning Director has reviewed this condition and states that an alternative is not possible at this point as any appeal to a condition has long run out of time. 14. The applicant's plans shall show the proposed access onto Bull Mountain Road as an emergency only access. That access shall be gated or otherwise improved to prevent general public motor vehicle access, but shall be accessible to emergency services providers, pedestrians and bicyclists. The access may be used for general public motor vehicle access only during an emergency or when otherwise approved for that purpose by the Planning Manager. Case Note: No emergency access proposed. Result: Once the construction easements and right -of -way copies are submitted to the city (Kim McMillan), the PFI permit for 132nd can be issued and this condition signed off The construction and acceptance of 132n will eliminate the need for Bull Mountain Road (emergency) access. 17. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the Public Facility Improvement (PFI) permit plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the Public Facility Improvement permit plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed. Result: This condition is tied to 132nd and Batterson Road. Kim will verify information in the 132n package. 29. The applicant shall submit preliminary sight distance certification for all driveways and intersections related to this development. Included with the preliminary certification shall be a detailed list of improvements required to produce adequate sight distance. Result: Kittleson is preparing certification. 35. The applicant shall satisfy the requirements of Section I of Washington County's Land Use and Transportation Department's letters dated June 3 and May 25, 2004, and provide written confirmation from the county that their requirements have been satisfied. Result: After the streets are built, assure Washington County approval and submit copy of such approval to Kim McMillan. Sue will get copies of letters referenced in previous mail and submit to Stephen Poage. UPDATE: The designer has stated that all safety requirements are integrated on drawings A2.o_,E2.o, Civil and Landscape drawings. This condition will also have to be verified through the Planning Department this week. DATE: April 28, 2005 TOPIC: Alberta Rider Elementary School Development Project (CUP 2003 - 00012) Development Site: 2S1o9AD, Tax Lot 01300 and 2S1o9AC, Tax Lot 02100. BACKGROUND: July 8, 2003 Pre - application Conference Held November 7, 2003 Application Received, Case Created April 15, 2004 Revised Application Received May 3, 2004 Application Deemed Complete July 2, 2004 Staff Report to Hearings Officer Prepared by Assigned Planner, Morgan Tracy July 12, 2004 Project approved by Hearings Officer August 24, 2004 Appeal received of the Hearings Officer's decision September 14, 2004 Appeal withdrawn and Hearings Officer's decision stands September 14, 2004 Public Hearing in front of City Council Alberta Rider Fee Breakdown As Of February 28, 2005 ENG 2004 -00081 Fees Due Current Date Erosion Control Permit $145.20 Remaining Engineering Deposit $9,909.32 $10,059.32 less ($150) paid Streetlight Energy & Maintenance $962.88 City - installed Traffic Controls $1,063.08 Current Total $12,080.48 12% Water Line Cost Estimate $960.00 $8,000 X 12% Current Total $960.00 I Fees Associated with CUP 2003 -00012 Undergrounding Fee $20,667.50 Current Total $20,667.50 I Fees Associated with BUP 2004 -00529 Traffic Impact Fee /Institutional $60,970.00 Traffic Impact Fee/Transit $13,400.00 Current Total $74,370.00 Miscellaneous Trust Account for Schools ($2,291.64) Credit Balance This trust account was set up to draw from for Tigard schools' projects for permits issued in the Building Department. It can be deposited into at any time and be used for Alberta Rider permits /issuance. Please Note: The fees listed above are the fees currently calculated in the case files for Alberta Rider Elementary School development. Other permit and /or development fees may be applicable at a future date. Memorandum of Understanding Between Tigard - Tualatin School District ( "District ") and the City of /'�rin'�' ��Il��I��'j1 Tigard ( "City ") "Hold Harmless" Project: Alberta Rider Elementary School This agreement is hereby made between Tigard - Tualatin School District 23J, hereinafter "District ", and the City of Tigard, hereinafter "City ", regarding authorization to proceed with limited site development associated with the project known as Alberta Rider Elementary School, 14850 S.W. 132 Terrace, Tigard, Oregon. It is understood that this authorization is being given prior to final approval of the public improvement plans and private improvement plans. District agrees to the following: • District agrees to hold harmless and indemnify City, and its employees, from all claims during this limited phase; • Submitted permits (Building - related permits and PFI permit) will continue through the plan review process until approval is reached. District has been given approval to proceed with some limited preparation and site work. • District will hold the City and its employees harmless from any and all changes needed to accommodate the public improvement construction drawings and private improvement construction drawings that may be different from drawings that limited approval may have been based upon. TIGARD TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT CITY OF TIGARD By: By: Title: Title: City Manager Date: Date: STEVE POAGE TIGARD TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 6960 SW SANDBURG STREET TIGARD OR 97223 SUSAN STARK HAYDON TIGARD TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 6960 SW SANDBURG STREET TIGARD OR 97223 JER PRATTON ED D TIGARD TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 6960 SW SANDBURG STREET TIGARD OR 97223 DAVID HAGGARD, SUPERINTENDENT ROBINSON CONSTRUCTION 21360 NW AMBERWOOD DRIVE HILLSBORO OR 97124 9321 CRAIG MARKUS CORNERSTONE MANAGEMENT 5331 SW MACADAM SUITE 377 PORTLAND OR 97239 9847 RICK RAINONE, PRESIDENT CORNERSTONE MANAGEMENT 5331 SW MACADAM SUITE 377 PORTLAND OR 97239 9847 BERNARD SMITH PE PLS WESTLAKE CONSULTANTS 15115 SW SEQUOIA PARKWAY SUITE 150 TIGARD OR 97224 CAROLINE NEUNZERT, CHAIRPERSON TIGARD TUALATIN SCHOOL BOARD 9221 SW LEHMAN STREET TIGARD OR 97223 ccs in house: Jim Hendryx Gary Lampella Kim McMillan Dick Brewersdorff Brian Blalock Morgan Tracy Sue Ross t December. 8, 2004 Stephen Poage, Director of Capital Projects Tigard — Tualatin School District 23J 6960 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Poage: Regarding your letter of November 24, Jim Hendryx has asked that I respond with your requested information regarding the Parks System Development Fee for Alberta Rider Elementary School. Based upon information I received from Rick Rainone, I have calculated the fee using 40 employees that will be employed at the school. The current Parks SDC is $131.00 per employee, making the total Parks fee $5,240.00. This represents the current rate and is subject to an approximate 6% increase on January 1, 2005. City representatives met with members of your project team this morning and we are confident that we are on our way to a mutual goal of successful project completion. I will be coordinating project information within our office, so please do not hesitate to contact me at 503-718 -2453 anytime you may have questions or concerns. Sincerely, Sue Ross, Permit Coordinator CITY OF TIGARD rjk CITY OF TIGARD OREGON November 14, 2005 Greg Weiler Ellis Eslick Associates Architects, P.C. 1230 SW First Avenue, Suite 300 Portland, OR 97204 Re: Alternate Method, of Construction — E -1 Occupancy Alberta Rider Elementary School 14850 SW 132 Terrace Permit # BUP2004 -00529 • We had previously approved your request for an alternate method of construction in conjunction with Eric McMullen, Deputy Fire Marshal with Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue for the above referenced project. We recently discovered that we had not formally documented this approval as required by the code. Therefore, please accept this as notification that the following alternate has been approved by the City of Tigard Building Division. Your proposal was to construct this building of Type II One -Hour construction, fully sprinklered in order to achieve your desired floor area, with some relief from the one - hour fire - resistive construction. Your other alternative would be to subdivide the building with 2 -hour area separation walls without a fire sprinkler system. Our belief is that a sprinklered building provides a far greater level of safety to the occupants than a nonsprinklered building provided with fire walls. However, the code does not allow us to use a sprinkler system for both an area increase and substitution for one -hour construction. Therefore, the following additional requirements must be met in order for us to approve the request. 1. The building will be provided with an Ordinary Hazard Group 2 sprinkler system instead of the required Light Hazard; and 2. The exit corridors shall be constructed as one -hour corridors with opening protection as required by Section 1004.3.4; and 3. Full coverage smoke detection throughout. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 Based on these additional items we feel that the building provides a level of protection to the occupants equal to or greater than the code prescribes. They are, in our opinion, inherently safer than a nonsprinklered building with fire wall compartmentization. These conditions were identified as being required items during the plan review process and were reviewed and inspected as such. All conditions have been met and have been approved in accordance with Section 104.2.8 of the State of Oregon Structural Specialty Code, 1998 edition. This letter is in conjunction with the letter we are in receipt of dated July 5, 2005 and further revised August 1, 2005. If you have any questions, please contact me at (503) 718 -2448. Respectfully, Gary Lamella Building Official c. Stephen Pogue, Tigard — Tualatin School District 23J File • • , , ' f July 5, 2005 (Revised 8/1/05) - :f Gary Lampella City of Tigard Wig" 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: ALBERTA RIDER ELEMENTARY - ALTERNATIVE UNDERSTANDING ELLIS ESLICK ASSOCIATES Dear Mr. Lampella: ARCHITECTS P.C. The purpose of this letter is to formalize the alternative understanding for the items below per UBC 104.2.8 "Alternate materials, alternate design and methods of construction ". P R I N C I P A L S The design will incorporate the items below "beyond Code" in exchange for "Items of FRANK E. ELLIS, AIA Exception" in order to improve the overall safety of the building inhabitants. RICHARD H. ESLICK, AIA GREGORY N. WEILER, AIA • "Beyond code" items are as follows: , A s s o c A T E s 1 . ADDITIONAL SPRINKLERS: Sprinklers are "Ordinary Hazard, Group 2" for the sprinkler design density. LINDA C. WALL, AIA , FRANCIS X. McBRIDE 2. ADDITIONAL SMOKE DETECTORS: Smoke Detectors are full area detection, but not in attic. 3. FIRE TRUCK ACCESS: Fire truck access is to the S.E. corner of the building, and the S.W. corner of the building. There is adequate space to maneuver the fire trucks. 4. BUILDING YARD SEPARATION: 60' separation around the building is maintained as a minimum. 5. ROOF SLIP SHEET: 1 -hr slip sheet is on top of the roof metal deck. 6. EXITING: Exiting is above and beyond what is required for travel distances and corridor ratings. 7. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Type V is allowed, Type II is used. "Items of exception" are as follows: 1. AREA SEPARATION WALLS: 904.2.4.2 states all El occupancies must have less than 20,000 s.f. actual area or be sprinkle red. Area separation walls would be required in order to not use sprinkler credit. Sprinkler credit needs to be used for substitution of 1 -hr construction to allow 2 stories. Both EEA and the City agree that the integrity of the Area Separation Walls become deteriorated over time and during construction due to the amount of penetrations required in a building of this type. It is further agreed that additional sprinklers and non - combustible construction create more reliable safety conditions. Therefore no area separation walls are included; however Type II and additional sprinklers are integrated. 1230 SW FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 300, PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 t 503.223.6963 f 503.294.0827 e -mail eea @eeaarchitects.com • r Alternative Understanding Page 2 2. ROOF CONSTRUCTION: For asphalt shingle roofing, OSB or Plywood is required for warranty on pull -out strength of fasteners. Due to Type II construction, we are using fire treated plywood immediately below the 3 -tab asphalt roofing shingles, and a 1 -hour slip sheet that is immediately on top of the metal decking. 3. OCCUPANCY RATIO: The occupancy ratio is 5% over what is allowed per UBC. 4. SECURITY GRILLES: Self- opening security grilles located at west end of corridor B210 and east end of corridor D209 will be provided with emergency power (generator) and open automatically upon alarm in an emergency. The grilles will limit public access to . the corridors adjacent to the gym and multi - purpose spaces to allow for after hours access to toilet rooms. One reason it is agreed this trade -off is acceptable is the precedents of other schools in the District. Another reason is that putting out fires immediately with a sprinkler system, reducing the amount of combustible material in the building, making shorter travel distances, and giving early warning are all more desirable than containing fires with Area Separation Walls. It is understood by both EEA and the City that only the items above are locked in as being acceptable to the parties signed below for the final occupancy of this building. Greg ei er Ga Lampella Architect of Record Building Official Dte Dat • ELLIS ESLICK ASSOCIATES /ARCHITECTS P 4.7 'BVP200 — 005 WI • )485c svV Ka ND Tt.R SCE' JED ReW ,E, 2 2005 G o OF TIGARD ENGINEERING, INC. BUILDING pIVIS "Engineering Integrated Solutions" 9400 SW Beaverton- Hillsdale Hwy Suite 250 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 -3302 (503) 292 -6000 E -mail: dshaw @rweng.com Fax: (503) 292 -1422 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 11, 2005 (Revised February 2, 2005) 262.016 TO: Kim Appleberry FROM: Doug Shaw SUBJECT: TTSD, Alberta Rider ES Responses to City of Tigard Electrical Plan Review Comments, prepared by Kim Appleberry, City of Tigard, January 6, 2005. 9. The code reference is 430.102(B). A review of the text of the code does not require placing the disconnect on the plans. It does, however, require that the disconnecting means, when installed, be within sight of the motor location and the driven machinery. Our specification requires conformance with the provisions of the NEC. Since we cannot control all variables of the construction process, we rely upon the contractors judgment of the construction environment to place the disconnect in compliance with the NEC. We will place the disconnect on the plans as requested. This is not an extra cost item. Refer to details 2/E5.1 and 4/E5.1 for addition of disconnect switches at FC -2 and FC -1 respectively. 10. Add General Note 16 to sheets E3.1 W, E3.2 W, E3.2E and General Note 15 to sheet E3.1E. Note shall state, "All junction -boxes and smoke detectors to remain accessible." Reference specification item 16130- 3.02.A, "Locate boxes to ensure accessibility of electrical wiring." This is not an extra cost item. Note 7 modified to include the following text, "All j -boxes to remain accessible." Note 8 modified to include the following text, "All j -boxes and smoke detectors to remain accessible." 13. Add to key note 6 on sheet E6.1, "Extend bonding conductor and connect to water main and fire main metallic piping system entering Fire 107 at west end of building on grid line L.4 / 2." See sheet P3.1W for location on plan. Detail 3 /E6.1 has been added to drawing identifying bonding conductor connections to piping systems and provides references to graphic changes on the plans and details. 12/13/04 Memorandum 2 14. See item 13 for other metal piping systems. 15. Please find attached PGE documents indicating the magnitude of available fault currents. • 17. Please find attached a diagram of generator, battery power system and transfer switch grounding. Refer to revision drawing E6.1 -R2. The referenced detail has been added to drawing E6.1 as detail 4/E6.1. 21. Please find attached elevator electrical data. Motor full load up, high speed, is 91A. Motor feeder, 430.22(E) 0.85 x 91 = 77.35WSA. Select 3 - #4, #6 Gnd., in 1 -inch conduit. Overload protection, 620.61(B)(1), 430.22, Table 430.52, for inverse time circuit breaker 91A x 2.5 = 148.5A. Select 150A circuit breaker. I can afraid I have created some unnecessary confusion with regard to the elevator machine branch circuit. The elevator machine is designed to be connected to the 480Y/277V distribution system. The response above incorrectly used load current data based upon a 208V system. We have also confirmed with the elevator supplier, ThysenKrupp, that a neutral conductor is not required in the feeder to the elevator machine. The nameplate data for the elevator motor is 20HP, 27 RLA @ 480V 3phase, Code letter H, control transformer load is 2A @ 480V, full load "up" high speed 40A (motor plus control transformer) @ 480V- 3phase. The revised 480V- 3phase feeder is as follows, per the requirements of NEC 620.13(B) (430.24 used as comparison), 430.62(A)/430.52/Table 430.52. Minimum conductor size per 620.13(B), 27A (motor) + 2A (control) = 29WSA ( #10 AWG). Wire size per 430.24, /27A (motor) x 1.251 + 2A (control) = 35.75W'SA ( #8 AWG). Select #8 AWG. Motor branch circuit, 3 - #8 Cu THHN, #10 Cu THHN Gnd., in 3/4 -inch conduit. Maximum rating or setting of motor branch circuit short circuit and ground fault protective device, per Table 430.52, for inverse time circuit breaker and poly phase or synchronous motor, [27A (motor) x 2.51 + 2A (control) = 69.5A. Select 60A circuit breaker. 25. Refer to attached revision drawing providing grounding electrode conductors from available grounding electrodes to the ground bus at 4MDP and 2MDP. Refer to revision drawing E6.1 -R1. Refer to detail 3/E6.1 with reference to details 3/E3.4 and 1 /E5.1 for bonding conductor extension to metallic piping systems. 26. The apparently undefined symbols in the main service disconnect circuit breaker compartment of 4MDP are conduit caps. These symbols will be removed and the grounding electrode conductors will be indicated as unbroken. The drawings will be modified where indicated and two copies of the modified drawings submitted to the City of Tigard as requested. • • 12/13/04 Memorandum 3 END OF MEMORANDUM W: \WF\262 Ellis- Eslick Architects \016_Alberta Rider Elementary School \003_Construction Administration \COR\'1emo 050201 EEA_City_Elect items Edit 1.doc Brian Blalock - FW: Alberta Rider ES, Electrical Code Review Items _ Page From: "Sean Scott" <sscott@eeaarchitects.com> To: <susanr @ci.tigard.or.us> Date: 12/14/2004 11:30:20 AM Subject: FW: Alberta Rider ES, Electrical Code Review Items -----Original Message From: Doug Shaw [mailto:dshaw @rweng.com] Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 5:21 PM To: Sean Scott Subject: Alberta Rider ES, Electrical Code Review Items Responses to Electrical Plan Review Comments, prepared by Kim Appleberry, City of Tigard, November 18, 2004. 1. Branch circuit design complies with ampacity and derating factors of NEC Table 310.16 and detrating factors of NEC Table 310.15(B)(2)(a). 2. All electric light and power conductors are installed in raceways. Where Class 1 non -power limited system wiring is not installed in raceways, the Contractor is required to comply with the provisions of NEC in accordance with specification section 16010- 1.07.A. • 3. Specification section 16109 -3.04 requires freezer /cooler box connections to comply with the equipment suppliers installation instructions. 4. Receptacles rated 125V, 15A and 20A in Kitchen and Dish Washing will be changed to GFCI type. 5. Appliance disconnecting means provided in accordance with specification section 16170. 6. Motor disconnecting means provided in accordance with specification section 16170. 7. Schedule, on drawing E3.3, labeled "Feeder Schedule" will be relabeled "Equipment Branch Circuit Schedule. 8. Kiln exhaust will be reviewed with mechanical. 9. Motor disconnecting means provided in accordance with specification section 16170. 10. Boxes and smoke detectors will remain accessible. 11. Luminaires are listed and labeled for pendant application. 12. Branch circuits will comply with provisions of NEC Article 620, Elevators. 13. No wet utilities enter the building underground at the East end of the building. 14. Other metal piping system grounding will be added to specification section 16450, Grounding. 15. Fault current ratings of equipment will be in compliance with the requirements of Section 16470, Switchboards and Distribution Panelboards and the available fault current values provide by PGE. 16. Generator and Battery Power System grounding will be added to the drawings. 17. Compliance with the definition of "separately derived" will be resolved and appropriate bonding and grounding will be provided in accordance with NEC Article 250. 18. The standby engine generator complies with the provisions of NEC Article 445, Generators. 19. The emergency system complies with the provisions of NEC Article 700, Emergency Systems. 20. Feeder conductors will be corrected to "2005 ". 21. The motor circuit has been sized in accordance with NEC Articles 620 Brian Blalock - FW: Alberta Rider ES, Electrical Code Review Items _ Page 2 and 430. The basis of design elevator machine load data will be reviewed again to assure compliance. The correct detail reference is 5/E5.3. 22. Equipment feeder conductors will be corrected to "1253 ". 23. Partial Plan 1/E3.3 will be modified to match 2/E6.1 and the Mechanical Equipment Connection Schedule. 24. The feeder overcurrent protective device will be added to circuit schedule for Panel 4L. The drawings will be modified where indicated and two copies of the modified drawings submitted to the City of Tigard as requested. Douglas D. Shaw, P.E. R &W Engineering, Inc. 9400 SW Beaverton- Hillsdale Hwy. Suite 250 Beaverton, Oregon 97005 Direct: (503) 546 -2657 Office: (503) 292 -6000 Fax: (503) 292 -1422 Email: <mailto:dshaw @rweng.com> dshaw @rweng.com 414A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON January 6, 2005 R & W Engineering 9400 SW Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy Suite 250 Beaverton, OR, 97005 Attn: Doug Shaw Dear Mr. Shaw, Here are some comments on your response letter of December 10, 2004 for the Alberta Rider Elementary School. In the interest of expediting the issuing of the permit, I thought we should try to resolve any discrepancies before you resubmit plans. If you would like to fax me a rough drawing of any changes to be sure we agree on them or if a phone conversation would be of use, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely yours, Kim Appleberry 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 January 6, 2005 Comments on your response of December 10, 2004 to my plan review for Alberta Rider School: 9. Disconnects for fan coils 1 and 2 need to be shown on the plan (NEC 420.102(B)). Sheet E5.1 — Detail 2 and 4 10. You can add to the three notes or I will red line it in: "All j -boxes and smoke detectors to remain accessible." 13. In regard to your response (no wet utilities entering at east end of building), that does not avoid the requirement. NEC 250.50 requires bonding "if available on the premises." Please make requested addition to Keyed Note 6. 14. On the plans you show bonds to structural steel, water and gas. It is appropriate that you also show on the plans a bond to "other metal piping systems" per NEC 250.104. 15. Please provide copies of the fault current calculations from PGE. 17. As I understand your response, you will provide a complete detail, on the plans, of the grounding and bonding of the generator, battery power system and transfer switches. This is what I need. 21. The only load data I see for the elevator is under "Load Summary — MDP" which indicates a 40 amp load. This would seem to mean that the 125 amp breaker on the 100 amp circuit is beyond what would be required for motor starting current. Please provide electrical data on the elevator equipment and the disconnect module. Also either change the main feeder breaker to 100 amp or show me the calculations for oversizing it. 25. Sheet E6.1 — Details 1 & 2 — All grounding electrodes available on the premises shall be bonded together to form the grounding electrode system (NEC 250.50). There is more than one way to do this. If it is done within the service enclosure of 4MDP as shown in 2/E6.1, then another set of grounding electrode conductors would also have to be run from each electrode to the 2MDP service. Your bonding the two services together does not meet the requirements. You should be aware that there is an Oregon amendment to the NEC that allows another design for this type of grounding situation. It is in Oregon Administrative Rule No. 918- 305 -160 (Electrical Specialty Code), Sections 250.53(C), 250.64(C), and 250.64(F). Please revise grounding details for both services to comply with NEC 250 and Oregon amendments. 26. Sheet E6.1 — Detail 2 — There is a symbol I don't understand. It is just inside the service enclosure, where the conductors enter from the ground rods and Ufer. If this constitutes a break in the conductors it might not comply with NEC 250.64(C) (continuous grounding electrode conductor, without a splice...). Please advise what this symbol represents. • r4 14 44.. hu_ azak atilkopt CITY TIGARD ORE GORI November 18, 2004 R & W Engineering 9400 SW Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy Suite 250 Beaverton, OR, 97005 Attn: Doug Shaw Dear Mr. Shaw, Here are the comments for the Alberta Rider Elementary School. Please make appropriate changes and resubmit two sets of plans. If you have any questions or I can be of any assistance do not hesitate to call on me. Sincerely yours, Kim • pp e.erry 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 Plan review comments for Alberta Rider Elementary School, Permit No. ELC2004- 00712: 1. General Notes - All conductors must comply with NEC 310.15(B)(2) (more than three current • carrying conductors...). 2. Sheet E3.2W - Note 7 - Class 2 and 3 circuits must comply with NEC 725.55 (separation from power and lighting). 3. Sheet E3.2E - All raceways penetrating walls of walk -in refrigerator and freezer to be sealed on the warm side of the wall complying with NEC 300.7(A). 4. Sheet E3.3 - Detail 2 - All 125volt, single phase, 15 and 20 amp receptacles installed in kitchen and dish area shall have ground fault protection per NEC 210.8(B). (There is not an exception for dedicated receptacles.) 5. Sheet E3.3 - Detail 2 - All appliances to have disconnecting means per NEC 422.31, 422.32, 422.34, 422.35. 6. Sheet E3.3 - Detail 2 - All motors to have disconnecting means per NEC Article 430, Part 9. 7. Sheet E3.3 - "Feeder Schedule" and "Kitchen - Electrical Equipment" - These are branch circuits, not feeders. 8. Sheet E3.5 - You might consider an exhaust fan for the kiln in custodian's office. This is just a friendly note and not part of electrical plan review. 9. Sheet E5.1 - Detail 2 and 4 - Fan coil 2 to have disconnect per NEC Article 430, Part 9. 10. Sheet E5.2 - Detail 2 and Keyed Notes 7,8,17 - All J -boxes and smoke detectors to remain accessible. 11. Sheet E5.2 - Keyed Note 7 - Cord drops to comply with NEC 410.30 (cord connected luminaires). 12. Sheet E5.3 - Detail 5 - Branch circuits to comply with NEC 620.22 through 620.25. 13. Sheet E6.1 - Keyed Note 6 - Bond to all metal underground water piping systems within 5 feet of point of entrance to building per NEC 250.52(A)(1). 14. Sheet E6.1 - Add additional Keyed Note: Bond to other metal piping systems per NEC 250.104. 15. Sheet E6.1 - All equipment to comply with NEC 110.9 (...sufficient to interrupt available current...). 16. Sheet E6.1 - Generator and battery power systems to be grounded per NEC. • • 17. Are generator and battery power systems "separately derived systems" as defined in NEC 100? If so, they need to be grounded per NEC 250.30 and their grounding systems must be bonded to the grounding electrode system of the building. Please show a detail of these two grounding systems: 18. Generator must comply with NEC 445. 19. Emergency system must comply with NEC 700. 20. Sheet E6.1 — Detail 1 — Panel `2L1B' — Main breaker in `2MDP' is 200 amp but feeder and panel are 100 amp — please correct. 21. Sheet E6.1 — Detail 2 = Feeder to elevator power module — Main breaker is 125 amp but conductors are only 100 amp. Also module detail is labeled 7/E5.3. This is an incorrect number. Please correct. 22. Sheet E6.1 — Detail 2 — Circuit to RTU 3 — Main breaker is 125 amp but conductors are only 60 amp. Please correct. 23. Sheet E6.1 — Detail 2 and E 3.3 — Detail 1 — The six RTU's are on both these drawings but the corresponding amperages are not the same. 24. Sheet E6.3 — Panel 4L — The 100 amp feeder to the automatic transfer switch is not shown in the panel schedule. . • September 22, 2005 1 _ _ ____ j Val Henze) CQ� Fv � City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd 5irll W �, 2 ii: ,° Tigard OR 97223 EEA ARCHITECTS P.C. A \, RE: Albetra Rider Elementary School P R I N C I P A L S S Maximum Occupancy Loads \Vi. t GREGORY N. WEILER MA. A. A S S O C I A T E S Dear Ms. Henzel: LINDA C. WALL A.I.A. Our code sheet uses 15sf per occupant for the maximum occupancy load for the i. Gymnasium & Multi- Purpose Room. We would like to refigure these rooms using 7sf per occupant to increase the allowed occupant load. We have exceeded the required 1 . number of exits and the required exit widths for both rooms. For the Gymnasium: `� y the exterior W e have d 1/3 2/3 of of th th e e occu occuppants ants usin using g the sin 2 sets et of of dou ble doors doors on on the the north to 1 , an the le s s into the corridor. Using 7sf /occupants for 4530sf room = 647 occupants x .2 for ' 'J required exit width = 130" = where one door is 65" wide. This meets code because we have two sets of double doors (each 72" wide), each of which are more than half the required width. The exits are more than half the diagonal distance apart. A For the Multi Purpose: If we use the 2 sets of double doors to the south into the corridor as the main exits and 2 stein le doors on the north to the exterior as the side exits. Using 7sf/occupants , t'-.. for 3705s ro 5 t om = 529 occupants x .2 for required exit width = 106" where one door is $ 53" wide. This meets code because we have two sets of double doors (each 72" wide), each of which are more than half the required width. The exits are more than half the `1.ba diagonal distance apart. Once out the exits, occupants have the choice of traveling east or west in a 1 -hour rated corridor. Sincere) , J Wi t k ee...000 ,„,0 0 -. . Greg Wei er, AIA ® ,), ,,, „.. (, o esc,� 0 ?C Boa - Os.e: ® ' fi. q ;- ,se� t ® ...y. • P 1 ' 1230 SW FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 300 • PORTLAND, OREGON 97204.3236 •:1503'.223'.6963'• f 503.294.0827 • e -mail eea @eeaarchitects.com ■ Val Henzel - Alberta Rider Elementary GYM /Multi - purpose room occupant load Page 1 From: Val Henzel To: mball@eeaarchitects.com Date: 9/21/2005 9:09:08 AM Subject: Alberta Rider Elementary GYM /Multi - purpose room occupant load ** Proprietary ** Per our conversation today, as I stated in my review of the plan today the exit system in the gym would accommodate a increased occupant load if we were to re calculate at the deviser of 7 sq ft per person as table 10 A allows. Therefore, the three exits required by a new occupant load would meet the code requirements for size and spacing of the exits. On the other hand the exit system in the multi - purpose room was designed on the occupant load it now accommodate, in order to increase this load one of the direct exits to the outside would need to accommodate the new occupant load factor. Therefore, one of the doors that lead out side would need to be at least 53 inches or more in order to get the occupant load increase. Please call me if you have further question or are wishing to change the occupant load factor in these rooms.. Val Henzel Senior Plans Examiner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 718 -2436 •