MMD2011-00003NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: Fanno Creek Boardwalk Planting Plan Modification
CASE NO.: Minor Modification (MMD) MMD2011 -00003
PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to modify the planting plan previously approved under
the Fanno Creek Trail and Bridge application (MMD2009- 00007).
APPLICANT: City of Tigard OWNER: Same
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
LOCATION: 13500 SW Hall Boulevard, WCTM 2S102DA, Tax Lot 600.
ZONING
DESIGNATIONS: I -L: Light Industrial District The I -L zoning district provides appropriate
locations for general industrial uses including industrial service, manufacturing
and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement,
and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as
noise, glare, odor, and vibration. (The I -L zone is located east of Hall Boulevard
and north of Fanno Creek).
R -12: Medium-Density Residential District. The R -12 zoning district is designed
to accommodate a fuU range of housing types at a minim lot size of 3,050
square feet. A wide range of civic and institutional uses are also perrnitted
conditionally. (The R -12 zone is located east of Hall Boulevard and south of
Fanno Creek).
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, and 18.530.
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted
in Section IV.
MMD2011 -00003 Fanno Creek Boardwalk Planting Plan Modification 1
THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
SECTION III. PROPOSAL & SITE INFORMATION
Proposal Information
This request is for a Minor Modification (1\4MD2011- 00003) approval to modify a planting plan previously
approved as part of the Fanno Creek Trail /Bridge application (SLR2009- 00002 /SLR2009-
00003/MMD2009 -00007 & MMD2009- 00013). Originally the trail segment was designed at grade. These
plantings were proposed to create a barrier to keep users from leaving the trail and disturbing natural areas.
The final design included an elevated boardwalk trail with a railing as a barrier. The plantings will act as an
additional barrier.
The proposed modification is only to plant size and species. No changes are proposed to the size or
location of the area to be planted. The 100 -year floodplain will not be further impacted than previously
approved. All modifications are outside of wetlands and the Clean Water Services vegetated corridor.
Site Information
The site (tax lot 600) has dual zoning, Light Industrial (I -L) and Medium High Density Residential (R-
12). The project area is located on the north side of Fanno Creek just north of the existing Tigard
Library. The proposed plantings will occur on the I -L portion of the site.
Site History
Staff conducted a search of City records for the subject property. The Tigard Library was approved for
tax lot 600 in 2003 (CUP2003- 00001). Various other approvals have been granted to construct a
gazebo in the open space adjacent to the library, modify the library parking lot and construct portions
of the Fanno Creek Trail.
SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Analysis of Modification Request:
Section 18.330.020 of the Tigard Development Code Conditional Use Review Section, states; "if
the requested modification meets any of the major modification criteria, that the request shall be
reviewed as a new Conditional Use application"
Section 18.330.020.B.2 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has
resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed:
1. A change in land use; The proposed landscape modification is not a change in land use. This
standard is satisfied.
2. A 10% increase in dwelling unit density; The site is not developed with a residential use;
therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
3. A change in the type and /or location of access ways and parking areas where off -site traffic
would be affected; The proposal is for a modification to an approved landscape plan. No
changes are proposed to accessways or parking areas. This criterion is satisfied.
4. An increase in the floor area proposed for non - residential use by more than 10% where
previously specified; An increase in floor area is not proposed. Therefore, this standard is not
applicable.
5. A reduction of more than 10% of the area reserved for common open space and /or usable
open space; There is no proposed reduction of open space. This criterion is not applicable.
MMD2011 -00003 Fanno Creek Boardwalk Planting Plan Modification 2
6. A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20 %; The applicant is not asking
for a reduction of setbacks. There are no structures as part of this proposal that require setbacks. This
standard is not applicable.
7. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10% where previously specified provided
such as: (a) Recreational facilities; (b) Screening; or (c) Landscaping provisions; The
proposed modification only affects the size and species of previously approved plantings. This
proposal does not affect any on -site recreational facilities, screening, or landscaping. This standard
is satisfied.
8. A 10% increase in the approved density; The proposed modification request does not involve
residential development; therefore, no increase to density is involved in the request.
Conclusion
This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has
determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general
welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties
provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and
federal laws.
SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision
A Minor Modification is a Type I procedure. As such, the Director's decision is final on the date it is
mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The Director's decision may not
be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City.
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON FEBRUARY 11, 2010
AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 12, 2010.
Questions:
If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW
Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639 -4171.
CA��� 0 . C
APPROVED BY: Cheryl Caines
Associate Planner
February 11, 2010
DATE
MMD2011 -00003 Fanno Creek Boardwalk Planting Plan Modification 3
VICINITY MAP
MMD2011 -00003
FANNO CREEK
BOARDWALK
PLANTING PLAN
MODIFICATION
Subject Site
D
4 1�
T1 ?7
Y 1
Information on tins map IS Tor general location
only and should be verified with the
Development Services Division.
Approx. z>Cale 1!4,000 - 1 In = 3J3 R
Map prVlteo at UJ'4J I'M on 11 t
DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES THE CITY OF TIGARO
RM S.NO WARRANTY. REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE
'- GWRALY,'I— INESSUft LOMPLETENESS�ANi OF
THEUAIAH tMUHtHON. IHECITYUH IIGRKUSHALLASSUMENO
LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRRoLS MI550NS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE
uny of I g ara
13125 SW Hall Blvd
TIGARD 6QS Tigard, OR 97223
M 503 639 -4171
www.tigard- or.gova�:.�'?w!�
8- Kelsey Do
5- Nootka Rose
3' -0" MIN. TYP,
8- Kelsey Dogwood
5- Rugosa Rose
Vegetative Corridor 7- Kelsey Dogwood
(Restored to Good Condition)
5- Nootka Rose
10- Kelsey Dogwood
Ety
Hall Blvd.
CWS Vegetated � r Sign
-y
I. I •° Ex idng.$ldewak
8- Nootka Rose
5- Kelsey Dogwood
9- Rugosa Rose
5- Kelsey Dogwood/ \
-No tka Rase
Kel ey Dogwood /
A /
9N 10- Rugosa Rose /
(' Boardwalk Planting within
Vegetative Corridor (Existing)
/ Wetlands
PLANT MATERIALS LISTING:
SVM
SHRUBS
oTr.
s¢E
cawmorv
0
M
16A.
Can
9Fi.x
"
70
1 CW.
Can
�.
x
10d.
Can
;rY
1, ��,1�'1" nAMn1c AaFi. �19x �,A91 a
A- nEm nay aA91
f
aAda1LL 9dL MYTIE N
- 9GNfY W NL4 • BOTCM a
RWRML aN woa'nAam 901.
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
xn
NOTES
1. ese sroa MAr ff sussnN9m MTx mxrMrlrA sroac a cauu wruE
2 MR MAY FE 9JBa11Nl wnl BAB EaUAL 4W 1
TMD— Wu S
PLANT maAL SHALL coWrad AIEMCN! rAWOASO raNU- sraae
"T MA — I & Mm s
ANS mat. 19m mina,.
a. Ail TWEFS sNALL eE eNANam.
s. MAw ALL iRANla1G eEOS wN r um. urtA a srtarlm MuL�.
a. tll ME EMLT O< A gSCAF <ElLLm1 nN9 YATFIIAL 11511NE . NE
aUNIM'S, nE ORAWWfS SHALL COLOW NNE PLANT SPEd6 NNO W/NnnE9 Ma
a. N nff EU]R OE GI.6nON CR LAd( . dMOTV d ORAMNOS. -- CONTRACTOR Is ro CALL IAMKCAPE ARCMimi 45aSE PR
a PE mNTRACIOR ro N— L/a1t15>rAfE ARMIIECf PPoat
T
TO MSIALLA 6 PLAIR W T
Y* ow
a GiosclPE oaN1AACNaR ro TNrT1IV TILE gVN11TFS.
• OFFSET FIRST ROW OF HEDGE PLANTING A MIN. OF T -0"
FROM EDGE OF BOARDWALK. REFER TO PLANT LISTING FOR
REQUIRED SPACING.
a a
Of 5 $
N �85: I
Z g
Of
—A —ARS IJ
OREGON ,(++
Q J_ Z
0� Z W Z
mu
u
he ° i O
m
� m LLo
u °3
Y ~ F
O
Z ne aD
lL W
s a scn 00
nil the � l —
�tier
c O 0
� PLINTNN6 Pl/Wl
At;3
3
` C.
WEd:
O SCALE: 1"= 20' -0" L1
0 1�0 K,
2S102DA00600
CITY OF TIGARD
13125 SW HALL BLVD
TIGARD.OR 97223
r;�
ci
RECEIVED
City of Tigard FEB 0 9 2011
Minor Modification — Typ� Pp A on
GENERAL INFORMATION In addition, the Director must find that the proposed
�. � change is in compliance with all applicable requirements of
Property Address /Loc tion s): Title 18 of the Tigard Development Code. To complete
�� 417 ; � this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a
Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): -V discussion indicating how the site expansion /change will
/U 7�> A / O/ 0 continue to comply with the maximum setback, building
Site Size: height, parking, and landscaping standards. Other
requirements of this title such as clear vision, solid waste
Applicant *: � - f 4 1 0 0 j 4-r storage, non - conforming situations, signs, and tree
Address: v ` ' yi removal may also be applicable depending on the type and
City/State: 4 f SQ 7 p: �L.� ! location of the proposed modifications.
Primary Contact: � r-[ 4 n 2 6 0
Phone: 4d,j ` 7/ "Z ax: 4FPZ -7A + 7 -7 X
E -Mail:
Property Owner /Deed Holder(s) *:
(Attach list if more than one) -
t 7 C.) I/ q 4 �"' 4'
Address: - J it. .4612 41 ti 1 0 y 4:hone:
City/ State:
Zip:
* When the owner and the applicant are different people, the
applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in
possession with written authorization from the owner or an
agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application
in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a
written authorization with this application.
Minor Modifications:
Minor Modifications are processed for permitted uses and
conditional uses. To review a modification as a Minor
Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion
or change does not invoke one or more of the criteria
discussed within Section 18.360.050(B) — Site Development
Review or Section 18.330.020(B)(2) — Conditional Use. If the
modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or
more of the criteria, a Major Modification review is required.
Major Modifications are processed in the same manner as a
new Site Development Review or Conditional Use Permit.
Applicant's Statement:
The applicant's statement must include a summary of the
proposed changes. Criteria in either 18.360.050(B) or
18.330.020(B)(2) must be addressed with a detailed response
to each criterion. Failure to provide the information needed
to process the application would be reason to consider an
application incomplete and delay
review of the proposal.
REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS
(Applications will not be accepted without the
following required submittal elements)
Application Form
Owner's Signature /Written Authorization
❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed - / - llqL.
[�J Site Plan (4 Large Plans & One -Reduced to 8t /z" x 11 ")
[9 Applicant's Statement /Narrative (4 copies)
❑ Filing Fee $599.00
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Case No.(s): P 9 X JD"o
Other Case No.(s):
Receipt No
Date:
i
Application Accepted By: P-
Date Determined Comple Iv? `�'
Revised: 7/1/10
i:\cuM1n\masters\1and use a lications \minor modification app.docx
City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 503 - 718 -2421 www.tigard - or.gov I Page 1 of 2
To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as
described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box.
(Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.)
THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
♦ The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject
ro er .
♦ If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights gr anted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the
conditions and limitations of the approval.
♦ All of the above statements and the statements in the site plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and
the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, and may be revoked if it is found that any such
statements are false.
♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the
requirements for approving or denying the application.
SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property.
DATED this ( day of '� r " , 20
Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature
Owner's Signature
City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503- 639 -4171 www.tigard- or.gov I Page 2 of 2
Fanno Creek Trail Segment, SLR 2009 -00002
Minor Modification Request
Applicant Narrative
On behalf of the City of Tigard, the landowner, this is to request a Minor Modification to the Fanno
Creek Trail Segment, Case Number SLR 2009 - 00002, et al., as approved by the Tigard Hearings Officer on
July 22, 2009.
Application Narrative
This minor modification proposal relates to the Planting Plan submitted as part of the original
application packet. The original plan set included an 11 "x 17" drawing labeled "Planting Plan" that
depicted planting strips located along both sides of the boardwalk portion of the trail. According to the
application narrative, this vegetated corridor is distinguished from the Clean Water Services (CWS)
vegetated corridor located along streams and around wetlands and consists of "thorny native
vegetation" intended to further discourage trail users and their pets from straying off the trail.
The Final Order approving SLR 2009 -00002 incorporated "the staff report and exhibits received..." The
plan set and narrative were part of the applicant's submittal from which the Hearings Officer made the
decision to approve the proposal. By virtue of its inclusion by reference in the staff report and in the
exhibits received, the Final Order effectively conditioned the City to plant and maintain the vegetated
barrier as shown in the Planting Plan.
The Planting Plan drawing included a "Fanno Creek Planting Plan Table" that described plant species and
their root size and spacing. The portion of the trail corridor within the Clean Water Services Vegetate
Corridor has been planted according to this table. The area outside the CWS Vegetated Corridor has
not been planted as yet. The proposed minor modification applies only to this unplanted area, or area
outside the CWS vegetated corridor.
The proposed Minor Modification is a revised planting table for this unplanted area only. No change to
the width, length, or function of the corridor of thorny vegetation is proposed, only to the planting
scheme. Highlights of the original and revised Planting Plans are as follows:
i /Irpin /duane /duane /li bra ry trail.minor modification request
(2.) Screening:
Screening is not mentioned in the original submittal as a purpose of the vegetated
corridor. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
(3.) Landscaping provisions:
No reduction in landscaping is proposed. The length and width of the proposed
vegetated barrier flanking the trail is unchanged.
h. A 10% increase in the approved density:
The development in question is a trail and road crossing and is not a residential
development. Likewise, no commercial or industrial structures are included in the
original or modified project proposal. A pedestrian bridge and boardwalk do not
qualify as commercial or industrial structures.
18.330.020.0 Minor Modification of Approval Plans or Existing Conditional Use.
Rationale for the Minor Modification.
Narrative: Please see above
Approval Criteria:
4
1. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title:
The modification includes changes to the vegetated corridor planting scheme only. No other
changes are proposed. All other components of the project have been completed as approved
by the Final Order.
2. The modification is not a major modification:
Compliance with this criterion is detailed above.
i /Irpin /duane /duane /library trail.minor modification request
R exist S/, - -
8- Kelsey Do
F(Restored 5- Nootka Rose
3' -0" MIN. (TYP.)
8- Kelsey Dogwood
5- Rugosa Rose
tative Corridor 7- Kelsey Dogwood
to Good Condition)
5- Nootka Rose
10- Kelsey Dogwood
Exist Guordroil
3 +50 4 +00
CWS Vegetated C idpr Sign
Hall Blvd.
W
1 -N
Existing $idewelk
6- Nootka Rose C/)�
5- Kelsey Dogwood
9- Rugosa Rose
3 5- Kelsey Dogwood
o tka Rose /
By Dogwood /
PI ANT MATFQIAI S I I.4TINr
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SYM
SHRUBS
OTY,
SIZE
CONDITION
REMARKS
w c
Corms mricea'KelmYi
Kelsey Reoosier Dopwooa
48
1 Cal.
Can
3 FT. o/c.
®
Rom nus—
N.k. Rose
26
1 Cal.
Can
3 FT. a /c.
®
Rosa N9om
24
1 Cal.
Can
3 FT. o/c.
~
o
Rug— Rom
O
m
Q
Q
ti 4
E ROOT RAJ L
ABOVE ADJACENT FINISH GRADE OF
PLANTING AREA
WA R R TION BASIN
BACKFlLL SOIL MIXTURE AS
f
:.... .......
_ SCAPoFY WALLS k BOTTOM OF
SET ROOTBALL ON UNDISTURBED SOIL.
GROMAX BAGS AS SPECIFIED.
3 X DIA. OF ROOT BALL
SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
NTS
NOTES
1. B&B STOCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH CONTAINER STOCK OF EQUAL GRADE.
2. CONTAINER STOCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH Bd18 STOCK OF EQUAL GRADE.
3. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM WITH AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NUSERY STOCK,
ANSI 260.1, 1986 EDITION.
4. ALL TREES SHALL BE BRANCHED.
5. MULCH ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH 2 MIN. LAYER OF SPECIFIED MULCH.
6. IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THIS MATERIAL LISTING AND THE
DRAWINGS, THE DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN THE PLANT SPECIES AND QUANTITIES REO.
7. IN THE EVENT OF QUESTION OR LACK OF CLARITY ON DRAWINGS, LANDSCAPE
CONTRACTOR IS TO CALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE PROCEEDING.
B. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR
TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL
9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY TREE QUANTITIES.
• OFFSET FIRST ROW OF HEDGE PLANTING A MIN. OF T -0"
FROM EDGE OF BOARDWALK. REFER TO PLANT LISTING FOR
REQUIRED SPACING.
�
L7
9X o 10- Rugosa Rose
Boardwalk Planting within /
Vegetative Corridor (Existing) /
/ c) Wetlands
FFe D
, Z0''
o
/ Or), Op
/ Wetlands � � NAro
Mo�
SCALE: 1" = 20' -0"
0 10 20 40
a
N m
�
0 O• m
°
i o
a w rn
U' 0
♦ 0 n
W
0 ? u
U r -
- r _ m
W = m m
wQSQ
Q a pp
W i 1p
U O
o m
i 3 u
X 540 `�
TROY A. MEARS U
OREGON �w
c9 pE AR
J
Z
Z
w c
H
v u
]L
d
z o
W
W
�
uf
<
ce
O
U
v)
0
J
a
~
o
Z J
O
m
Q
Q
= v
LL
m
REVISIONS
—QLTL— cNO.K>h
SHEET NAME:
PLANTING PLAN
DRAWN By TAM
NECKED BY: TM1
ISSUE DATE: /11
NO.: 11
SHEET:
L1
OF 1
Cheryl Caines
From: Troy Mears <troym @mearsdesigngroup.com>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 1:57 PM
To: Ron Bunch
Cc: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Fanno Crk Trail Boardwalk & Ped Bridge
Great, thanks Ron. Please let me know if I need to do anything else.
Troy
MEARS DESIGN GROUP, LLC I Troy Mears I Principal
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
PO Box 23338 1 Portland, Oregon 97281
P 503.601.4516 1 F 503.924.46881 C 971.255.7474
troy m(d-)mearsdesigngroup.com
This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive
for the addressee), you may not use, copy, print, or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this message. If
you have received this email in error, please advise the sender by reply and delete the message. Thank you.
From: Ron Bunch [mailto:ron @tigard- or.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 1:51 PM
To: Troy Mears
Cc: Cheryl Caines
Subject: RE: Fanno Crk Trail Boardwalk & Ped Bridge
Works for me if it works for Steve. Let's leave the rosa in place!
Thanks
Ron
From: Troy Mears [ mailto :troym @mearsdesigngroup.com]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 12:14 PM
To: Ron Bunch; Cheryl Caines
Subject: Fanno Crk Trail Boardwalk & Ped Bridge
Hello Ron and Cheryl,
Attached is the revised planting plan that should accommodate the safety and height issues. I replaced the Redosier
Dogwood with the Kelsey Redosier Dogwood (3 to 4 ft height). I show just a few Rosa on the south side of the
boardwalk just to show some symmetry in the design. There should still be plenty of exposure to views under the
boardwalk for safety, but if you would like me to take them out and have all Kelsey Dogwood along the south side let me
know and I will revise the plan. Hopefully this will work for all stakeholders.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Thank you.
Troy
MEARS DESIGN GROUP, LLC I Troy Mears I Principal
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
PO Box 23338 1 Portland, Oregon 97281
P 503.601.4516 1 F 503.924.4688 1 C 971.255.7474
MEARS DESIGN GROUP, LLC I Troy Mears I Principal
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
PO Box 23338 1 Portland, Oregon 97281
P 503.601.4516 1 F 503.924.4688 1 C 971.255.7474
troy m(&-mea rsdesig ng rou p. com
This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive
for the addressee), you may not use, copy, print, or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in this message. If
you have received this email in error, please advise the sender by reply and delete the message. Thank you.
DISCLAIMER: E -mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail
may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E -mails are retained
by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule."