Loading...
MMD2010-00021AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING i I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first dulyswom/affirm, on oath depose and saythat I am a Planning Assistant for the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: following: Check Appmp�- B. {s) Bd.-} ❑x NOTICE OF DECISION FOP: MMD010- 00021 /COLOSSAE CHURCH EXPANSION (File No. /Name Reference) 1 AMENDEDNOTICE ® City of Tigard Planning Director A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit " X, and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made apart hereof, on August 6, 2010, and deposited in the United States Mail on August 6, 2010 postage prepaid. W STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the OFFICIA n252011 SHMLEY E!ENOTARY PUBLI COMMISSION ION EXPIRES i l day of >q06 U97(--- 32010. NO MY PUBLIC OF O , R j GON My Commission Expires: NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION p MINOR MODIFICATION (MMD) 2010 -00021 COLOSSAE CHURCH EXPANSION 120 DAYS = 12 -03 -2010 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Colossae Church Expansion CASE NO.: Minor Modification (MMD) MMD2010 -00021 PROPOSAL: The proposal is for expansion of an existing religious facility into an adjacent, vacant tenant space. The proposed expansion is 4,800 square feet. APPLICANT: Commercial Contractors, Inc. OWNER: Walton CWOR Park BC 8, LLC Attu: Eric Money c/o GVA Kidder Mathews 1265 S 35 Pl. One SW Columbia Suite 950 Ridgefield, WA 98642 Portland, OR 97258 LOCATIONS: 12178 SW Garden Place Building 3, WCTM 2S101BB, Tax Lot 1400 ZONING DESIGNATIONS: C -G: General Commercial District. The C -G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uses with a City -wide and even regional trade area. Except where non - conforming, residential uses are limited to single- family residences which are located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult ente automotive equipment repair and storage, mini- warehouses, utilities, heliports, medical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.360, 18.390, and 18.520. MMD2010 -00021 Colossae Church Expansion 1 SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III. PROPOSAL INFORMATION This request is for a Minor Modification (MMD2010- 00021) approval to expand an existing 4,800 square foot religious facility into the adjacent, vacant tenant space. The use will be expanded an additional 4,800 square feet. The proposed construction is to remove /replace interior walls and create informal social areas for church members and not an expansion of the worship facility. No changes are proposed to the building exterior or site as shown on the plans provided by the applicant. The previous use of the space was office. A Minor Modification to permit the church was issued in December 2008 (MMD2008- 00024). SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter, states; "any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. Parking requirements for religious facilities is based on the number of seats within the main assembly area. This proposal does not affect the size of the main assembly area, which is not located within the expansion area. The expansion includes areas for informal gathering, for example gathering over coffee. In addition, the church will not be competing with other uses located in the business park since these gathering will be outside of the normal Monday through Friday business hours. Also, the applicant is not adding any square footage to the building. No additional on -site parking is required. This standard is satisfied. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural type of the buildings is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has not proposed any changes to building heights. Therefore, this standard is met. MMD2010 -00021 Colossae Church Expansion 2 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected. The proposal is for interior remodel and expansion of an existing use. No changes are proposed to accessways or parking areas. This criterion is satisfied. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. The applicant states that the expansion is not intended to increase the square footage of the worship facility, only to create informal gathering areas for those already attending the church services. Church membership and attendance may fluctuate over time, but the expansion will not significantly increase the amount of traffic to and from the site. This criterion is met. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non - residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The use will increase by 4,800 square feet. This expansion is less than 5,000 square feet. Therefore, this standard is satisfied. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and /or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. No common open spaces were previously required. This criterion is not applicable. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and /or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. The proposal is for an interior remodel. No site changes are proposed. This standard is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. This proposal does not modify or adversely affect any of the conditions from the previous approval (SDR12 -80, Park 217 Business Center. This standard is met. CONCLUSION: This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental or injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Affected government agencies MMD2010 -00021 Colossae Church Expansion 3 Final Decision A Minor Modification is a Type I procedure. As such, the Director's decision is final on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. The Director's decision may not be appealed locally and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 6, 2010 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 7, 2010. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639 -4171. Q - August 6, 2010 APPRO D BY: Cheryl Caines DATE Associate Planner MMD2010 -00021 Colossae Church Expansion 4 VICINITY MAP MMD2010 -00021 COLOSSAE CHURCH EXPANSION Subject Site Information on this map is for general location only and should be verified with the Development Services Division. Scale 1:4,000 - 1 in = 333 ft Map printed at 08:40 AM on 06 -Aug -10 DATA IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES. THE CRY OF TIOARD MAKES NO WARRANTY. REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE AS TOTHE CONTENT, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OF THE DATA PROVIDED HEREIN. THE CRY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW CAUSED. d Uty of I Igard T�A��dAPS 1 Tigard, 03 6 9-417123 , www.tigardor.gov Kites r FINAL APPROVAL CITY CF E iGAM PLAMNN*G aVl$K)N BY C . C _ DATE 9 - to a) Site Plan - - -- \� Walton CWOR Park BC 8 LLC By CTMT - Walton RE Tax 4678 World Parkway Cir St. Louis, MO 63134 Commercial Contractors, Inc. Attn: Eric Money 1265 S 35" Pl. Ridgefield, WA 98642 Walton CWOR Park BC 8, LLC c/o GVA Kidder Mathews One SW Columbia Suite 950 Portland, OR 97258 MMD2010 -00(._ COLOSSAE CHURCH EXPANSION EXHIBIT 6 2S10113601400 WALTON CWOR PARK BC 8 LLC BY CTMT - WALTON RE TAX 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR ST LOUIS, MO 63134 i��ao�v -oo6ai �eca7� GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address /Location(s): /V7? fk/ Gu rcl Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): Site Size: Applicant *: ( �tRY1 1P/�l� � �r )rs T-T.r✓ Address: /,; & S. 35 &,ee City/State: IT ,a cldA� Zip: ft_ Primary Contact: Oric jrV eP Phone: s 0 3 . 997• qY`IQ Fax: 60 9- 231 661Y f _ E -Mail: Property Owner /Deed Holder(s) *: (Attach list if more than one) W �Non GWO►2 P a ✓K BL 8 LI.L r/1 eck�r of �rW4' K•�r n�C.i Address e 6VI 60U h, a Su.Xt Q Phone: 5_0 3aal �Fi✓ City/State: Pn r16 rYA Olt Zip: 97aSS * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Track 1: Design Review Compliance Letter A Design Compliance Letter provides for a Type I review process, using the clear and objective Design Standards. It is intended for smaller buildings and site renovation projects, which meet the threshold of 18.610.010.E.1. Applicant's Statement /Narrative: The applicant's statement must include a summary of the proposed changes. Applicable criteria and design standards in 18.610 must be addressed with a detailed response to each criterion. Failure to provide the information needed to process the application would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change is in compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18 of the Tigard Development Code. To complete this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion indicating how other requirements of this title are still satisfied. These requirements include but are not limited to: access, landscaping and screening, waste and recyclable storage, parking, sensitive lands, signs, tree removal, vision clearance, and streets and utilities. Please see section 18.610.035 of the Tigard Development Code for a complete list. 55 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Applications will not be accepted without the following required submittal elements) Application Form Owner's Signature /Written Authorization Title Transfer Instrument or Deed /_b,eJ&(t'r Site Plan X Large Plans & 1 Reduced to 8 ' /z" x 1" Applicant's Statement /Narrative (4 copies) Filing Fee $599.00 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: Date: Application Accepted By: Date Determined Complete: Revised: 7/1/10 I: \CURPLN \Masters \Land Use A lications \downtown T e I a2e.docx City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503- 718 -2421 1 www.tigard - or.gov I Page 1 of 2 City of Tigard = s Downtown Design Review h Compliance Letter - Type I Application GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address /Location(s): /V7? fk/ Gu rcl Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): Site Size: Applicant *: ( �tRY1 1P/�l� � �r )rs T-T.r✓ Address: /,; & S. 35 &,ee City/State: IT ,a cldA� Zip: ft_ Primary Contact: Oric jrV eP Phone: s 0 3 . 997• qY`IQ Fax: 60 9- 231 661Y f _ E -Mail: Property Owner /Deed Holder(s) *: (Attach list if more than one) W �Non GWO►2 P a ✓K BL 8 LI.L r/1 eck�r of �rW4' K•�r n�C.i Address e 6VI 60U h, a Su.Xt Q Phone: 5_0 3aal �Fi✓ City/State: Pn r16 rYA Olt Zip: 97aSS * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Track 1: Design Review Compliance Letter A Design Compliance Letter provides for a Type I review process, using the clear and objective Design Standards. It is intended for smaller buildings and site renovation projects, which meet the threshold of 18.610.010.E.1. Applicant's Statement /Narrative: The applicant's statement must include a summary of the proposed changes. Applicable criteria and design standards in 18.610 must be addressed with a detailed response to each criterion. Failure to provide the information needed to process the application would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change is in compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18 of the Tigard Development Code. To complete this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion indicating how other requirements of this title are still satisfied. These requirements include but are not limited to: access, landscaping and screening, waste and recyclable storage, parking, sensitive lands, signs, tree removal, vision clearance, and streets and utilities. Please see section 18.610.035 of the Tigard Development Code for a complete list. 55 REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Applications will not be accepted without the following required submittal elements) Application Form Owner's Signature /Written Authorization Title Transfer Instrument or Deed /_b,eJ&(t'r Site Plan X Large Plans & 1 Reduced to 8 ' /z" x 1" Applicant's Statement /Narrative (4 copies) Filing Fee $599.00 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Case No.(s): Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: Date: Application Accepted By: Date Determined Complete: Revised: 7/1/10 I: \CURPLN \Masters \Land Use A lications \downtown T e I a2e.docx City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503- 718 -2421 1 www.tigard - or.gov I Page 1 of 2 To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject p rope M. ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All of the above statements and the statements in the site plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, and may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 2 / day of , 20 aA,��� , G vff �cddec Applicant /Authorized Agent's Signature Owner's Signature 4-t �, Z, - = = �-- Owne ' Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503 - 639 -4171 www.tigard - or.gov I Page 2 of 2 RECEIVED Attachment 1 City of Tigard AUG 042010 CITY OF TIGARAD PLAN , *ffildG" 4 a" 1 " l Downtown Design Review Compliance Letter - Type I Application GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address /Location(s): X 0 17 9' 4 z r d rlI t , � 2 AJ ©�Q Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): a5 101 Site Size: Applicant*: Address: /, )&, _— S, Sr'K hol City/State: 8"44 e-641d (,W� - Zip: ft& !v) Primary Contact: E✓'I G ene Phone: 9V i/Y Fax: 503 2 97. 66y E -Mail: e I C L 10 l' -ba 1 Property Owner /Deed Holder(s) *: (Attach list if more than one) V1 6110A GWPA Ph /K A6 `d 1 i'a :,r r 6-v K 04 Address: Qn e 6W Cb 1 u yk h c S«z'i Y O Phone: 503 Jar �e City /State: &♦ t l c iYY J IL Zip: 97259' * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. Track 1: Design Review Compliance Letter A Design Compliance Letter provides for a Type I review process, using the clear and objective Design Standards. It is intended for smaller buildings and site renovation projects, which meet the threshold of 18.610.010.E.1. Applicant's Statement /Narrative: The applicant's statement must include a summary of the proposed changes. Applicable criteria and design standards in 18.610 must be addressed with a detailed response to each criterion. Failure to provide the information needed to process the application would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change is in compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18 of the Tigard Development Code. To complete this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a discussion indicating how other requirements of this title are still satisfied. These requirements include but are not limited to: access, landscaping and screening, waste and recyclable storage, parking, sensitive lands, signs, tree removal, vision clearance, and streets and utilities. Please see section 18.610.035 of the Tigard Development Code for a complete list. REQZUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Applications will not be accepted without the following required submittal elements) Application Form Owner's Signature /Written Authorization Title Transfer Instrument or Deed Site Plan ( Large Plans & 1 Reduced to 8'/z" x 1" Applicant's Statement /Narrative (4 copies) J� fe1�JG Filing Fee 5599.00 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Case No.( M M 02 0 10 - 00 v a Other Case No. Receipt No.: .V 17 S R(, 5 Date: ea — S — 10 Application Accepted By: Date Determined Complete: Revised: 7/1/10 Use City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503 - 718 -2421 1 www.tigard- or.gov Page 1 of 2 Attachment 1 Cont'd To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as d escribed on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANTS) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: ♦ The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject ro e ♦ If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. ♦ All of the above statements and the statements in the site plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, and may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 2� day of 1 20 v8 -dd.� n"� I Applicant /Authorized Agent's Signature Owner's Signature Owne# Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 1 503- 639 -4171 www.tigard- or.gov Page 2 of 2 CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard OR 97223 503.639.4171 _ Receipt Number: 178965 - 08/05/2010 CASE NO. FEE DESCRIPTION REVENUE ACCOUNT NUMBER MMD2010 -00021 Minor Modification to an Approved Plan 1003100 -43116 2 Minor Modification to an Approved Plan - 1003100 -43117 LRP Total: R ECEIPT PAID $522.00 $77.00 PAYMENT METHOD CHECK # CC AUTH. CODE ACCT ID CASHIER ID RECEIPT DATE RECEIPT AMT Check 28218 DADAMSKI 08/05/2010 $599.00 Payor: Commercial Contractors Inc Total Payme $599.00 Balance Due: $0.00 Page 1 of 1 Attachment 2 1. Security may consist of a faithful performance bond payable to the City, cash, certified check or such other assurance of completion approved by the City Attorney; and 1 If the installation of the landscaping is not completed within the six -month period, the security may be used by the City to complete the installation. D. Business tax filing. The applicant shall ensure that all occupants of the completed project, whether permanent or temporary, shall apply for and receive a City of Tigard business tax prior to initiating business. 18.360.050 Major Modification(s) to Approved Plans or Existing Development A. Determination request. An applicant may request approval of a modification to an approved plan or existing development by: 1. Providing the Director with three copies of the proposed modified site development plan; and 2. A narrative which indicates the rationale for the proposed modification addressing the changes listed in Subsection B below. B. Evaluation criteria. The Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. There will be: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; Site is not a residential development. 1 \ 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; 1 Site is pot a residential development; no related dwelling units 3. A chan e that re uires additional on -site in accordance.with Cha ter 18.765• As explained in main response - additional parking is not needed due to the church expansion. Further. church activities will normally occur during period outside normal business hours. thus church will not be competing with othe businesses in the park. 4. A change m the type ot commercial or industrial s ructures as defined by the Uniform SuiTdmg Code; No change to the type of structure is proposed. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 %; No change in building height proposed; reference plans. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected; No changes proposed. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; No significant increase in vehicular traffic anticipated as explained in body of main response. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; Expansion area is less than 5.000 square feet. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10 %; Common open space is not affected by this project. 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site lan: Project amenities are not affected by this project. Site Development Review 18.360 -4 Code Update: 10109 1 a, Recreational facilities; WA b. Screening; and/or ED c. Landscaping provisions. F 7 1 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of Subsections B.1 through 10 above of this section. We believe item 1 I is not applicable to this project. C. When the determination is made. Upon deteimiiung that the proposed modification to the site development plan is a major modification, the applicant shall submit a new application in accordance with Sections 18.360.030 and 18.360.070 for site development review prior to any issuance of building permits. 18.360.060 Minor Modification(s) to Approved Plans or Existing Development A. Minor modification defined. Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in Section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification: B. Process. An applicant may request approval of a minor modification in accordance with Section 18.360.030.B and as follows: 1. Providing the Director with three copies of the proposed modified site development plan; and 2. A narrative which indicates the rationale for the proposed modification addressing the changes listed in Section 18.360.050.8. C. AWroval criteria. A minor modification shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied following the Director's review based on the finding that: 1. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title; and 2. The modification is not a major modification. 18.360.070 Submission Requirements A. General submission requirements. The. applicant shall submit an application containing all of the general information required for a Type 11 procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040. B. Additional information. In addition to the submission requirements required in Chapter 18.390, Decision - Making Procedures, an application for the conceptual development plan must include the following additional information in graphic, tabular and/or narrative form. The Director shall provide a list of the specific information to be included in each of the following: 1. An existing site conditions analysis; 2. A site plan; 3. A grading plait; Site Development Review 18.360 -5 Code Update: 10109 AgNm8rdoltgWriefts k c. general contractors August 4, 2010 Attn: Cheryl Caines Associate Planner City of Tigard Re: Colossae Church Expansion Permit RECEIVED AUG 0 4 2010 CITY 4F TIGARD PIANi NW3 3 IE"G I"EF - 141 MG Dear Ms. Caines, the following is response to your e -mail received 8/2/10: 1265 S. 35 th Place, Ridgefield, WA 98642 (mailing) 5573 S. 15t Circle, Ridgefield, WA 98642 (office /shop) 503.227.4440 / 360.887.7234 / FAX 503.227.6644 http: // www.ccigc.com 1) 1 thought the site was in the new Downtown Mixed Use zone, and the review would be a Track 1 Downtown Design Review. However, the site is just Tigard outside of the new zone; therefore the correct review procedure is a Minor Modification. Response No Action Required. 2) 1 have attached the correct application form. Please fill out the first page Tigard of the form and submit along with the Downtown form, which is already signed by the owner's representative. Response Please see attachment 1 3) Steve said that there is a deed on file from a previous Minor Mod. Each application submittal is a separate file and that information is a couple of years Tigard old. Please verify that the owner is the same as our records show (see attached Assessor's data). Response Owner is as shown on Assessors data provided 4) Please address the attached criteria, addressing how the proposal to expand into the adjacent tenant space will not trigger any of the 11 criteria. Tigard (See attached under 18.360.050.B. 1 -11) For example, with #1. This is not applicable since the proposal does not include residential development. The proposal is to expand a church use within a commercial complex. Response Please see attachment 2 Tigard 5) How large is the expansion (square feet) and what was the previous use? Response Expansion Area is 4,800 square feet. Previous use - Mortgage Office 6) Are there any other uses within the complex that would also utilize parking Tigard at the same time the church would be using it? There are no significant competing uses for parking. As explained in Response response to item 7 below, the church doesn't expect significant if any parking nor traffic increases due to the expansion. 1265 S. 35 th Place, Ridgefield, WA 98642 (mailing) 5573 S. 15t Circle, Ridgefield, WA 98642 (office /shop) 503.227.4440 / 360.887.7234 / FAX 503.227.6644 http: // www.ccigc.com Continued Tigard 7) You state that traffic is not expected to increase from the expansion. What is the reasoning for this? Why would the added space not be increasing traffic? Colossae Church intends to use the expansion area as an informal social gathering area for use by church members and their guests. It is not intended as an expansion of the existing worship facility, rather a more comfortable venue where people may Response gather informally, socialize over coffee, etc. Church membership and attendance may fluctuate over time as is typical, but since the expansion is intended for use by those who already attend the church, the church does not foresee any reason for significant if any traffic nor parking increases. Please contact me with questions, comments or if you require further information. Thank you, Eric Money Project Manager co m m or da / 9o0 tr o s to r s // c. general contractors July 29, 2010 City of Tigard Community Development Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Cheryl Caines, Associate Planner Re: Colossae Expansion Tenant Improvement, intended use of the Colossae expansion area Dear Ms. Caines Colossae Church intends to utilize the expansion area as an informal social gathering area. The area is not intended as an expansion of the sanctuary nor formal worship facility. We expect gatherings to be relatively infrequent, occurring mostly on Sundays before or after services and occasionally on evenings. We do not anticipate significant traffic nor parking increases due to the expansion. Please contact me should you have further questions or comments. Thank you, Eric Money Project Manager 503.209.1617 1265 S. 35"' Place, Ridgefield, WA 98642 (mailing) 5573 S. 1' Circle, Ridgefield, WA 98642 (office /shop) 503.227.4440 / 360.887.7234 / FAX 503.227.6644 http -.// www.ccigc.com M Cheryl Caines From: Eric Money [eric @ccigc.com] Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:43 PM To: Cheryl Caines Subject: Colossae, Description of Expansion Area Use Attachments: Colossae, Letter Describing Intended Use.pdf Cheryl, attached is letter we spoke about. Please contact me with questions or comments. Thank you, Eric Money Commercie /Contrecto�s, /flop. general contractors 503.227.4440 Office 503.227.6644 Fax 503.209.1617 Mobile eric(a-)ccigc.com 10111 Geographic information Sys s Navigation: Washington County » §_I5 >> Reports: Parcel Report 2S101BB01400 I A &T Report 2S101BB01400 General Information interactive maps map gallery data catalog contacts other gis links gis introduction frequently asked questions Property Search property / taxlot tax maps gps latitude / longitude Survey Search Land Services Building Services = Content Restricted Assessment & Taxation Report P_er,er�l D,^—+v Tnfnrmntinn Site Address: 12000 SW GARDEN PL. TIGARD OR, 97223 Tax Lot ID: 2S101BB01400 Property Account ID's: R1276345, R1276336, Property Classification: 2010 Neighborhood Code: ZFWY Latitude / Longitude: 45.4322858 / 122.760750 IH Ownership Information: WALTON CWOR PARK BC 8 LLC BY CTMT - WALTON RE TAX 4678 WORLD PARKWAY CIR ST LOUIS, MO, 63134 Qal— / naael Tnfnrmatinn Sale Date Sale Instrument Deed Type Sale Price Market Land Value: $121,980 Market Bldg Value: $0 Special Market Value: $0 Market Total Value: $121,980 Taxable Assessed Value: $36,950 Legal: CROW PARK 217 Lot 2 Aaeaeearl Value fnr Aernunt R1276345 Roll Date: 09/21/2009 Taxcode: 023.81 Market Land Value: $121,980 Market Bldg Value: $0 Special Market Value: $0 Market Total Value: $121,980 Taxable Assessed Value: $36,950 Legal: CROW PARK 217 Lot 2 Lot Size: A &T Acres: 0.16 Bldg Sq Ft: 0 Year Built: N/A A— —A VmInac fnr Arrnnnt R1 776336 Roll Date: 09/21/2009 Taxcode: 023.74 Market Land Value: $8,475,750 Market Bldg Value: $11,721,710 Special Market Value: $0 Market Total Value: $20,197,460 Taxable Assessed Value: $9,133,800 Legal: CROW PARK 217 Lot 2 Lot Size: A &T Acres: 13.08 Bldg Sq Ft: 0 Year Built: N/A Improvement Informati Total Im provement Value: Plumbing Bedrooms Improvement Details Description lValue Square Feet © 2000 - 2010 Washington County. All rights reserved. Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by Washington County. By visiting this and other Washington County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of the site. For questions regarding information privacy, liability, accessibility, and public records policies, please review the statements document This page maintained by Washington County Technology Services. Need assistance with this page? email us ------- 1 ------ - - --- � 1 0 i 22 1 I � I � i 1 ' I � I i I i ( i I i I i Ii 22 Al I 1• 1• I � _