Plans (359) 1
I �:� w �: LED( �TMTa)11
. \ -' ` y'. CONSTRUCTION RI 1 #122
nn
Project: The Knoll At Tigard From: Chris Cudahy
To: Carleton Hart Architecture
From: LMC Construction
Ben White
Date: 8/26/10
Re: Mail Room 115 OSA Louver
Specification Section: 061000 & 230000 Drawing Reference: M2.01 Detail: See below
Request:
I ' 1. In mail room 115 on sheet M2.01, there is a 24 x 12 OSA louver called out. Is it acceptable to
cut through the studs and shear panel at this location (see picture below), and is an elevation of
8'2" from concrete floor to top of louver acceptable? Please confirm.
pf1 a
PP�}, s
t t' f \ FA , Fs -.,
' ' , :::'i,'.1,,,,t,,' j t , V "1 ... ' , . • ,.." 1 ' fl.. 1 , .. 0
r
7th � � _ -
SY , - I
g
Response:
1 Top of louver opening @ 8' -2" above concrete floor in mail room is acceptable — see also structural response.
Response From: Ben White To: Clyde Zahn / Scott Dekker / Chris Cudahy Date Rec'd: 08.26.20 Date Ret'd: 08.26.10
Signed by: Date: 08.26.10
,f'rt+
.. -_ •, CONSTRUCTION RFI #122
nn
Project: The Knoll At Tigard From: Chris Cudahy
To: Carleton Hart Architecture
From: LMC Construction
Ben White
Date: 8/26/10
Re: Mail Room 115 OSA Louver
Specification Section: 061000 & 230000 Drawing Reference: M2.01 Detail: See below
Request:
1. In mail room 115 on sheet M2.01, there i s a 24 x 12 OSA louver called out. Is it acceptable to
cut through the studs and shear panel at this location (see picture below), and is an elevation of
8'2" from concrete floor to top of louver acceptable? Please confirm.
r ' t �� ✓
r .. • X 2 s I i i b y ' ,L , 3 t . :, z - W Fm � , t,
x � ,
i'�A Y 4 Y ti K f k 1 It _ f , '`
t "'k '. r ,'''.;„1,... y ' - 3 t. i ;- ?V §
3 ,L x F r s ei ., J ' i ) �e V;4:I r tiN
_ _ Y 'S _ . 4 . ` -- 3 1 �y ` a� ""`
F _. ` € F 'i..,,',,-', x l r :!;f1:.--: ; e t - ? ; 5 # t y C
. ; _ r: Y - Y��,wfy
^a 3 i f Y �. 3 G t$�i£1
E� ` ` ''... ,
x z T-f
.
a,•_ 6 ` X t� r k . f)* S
:::!:i.:4'...:,x ;� _1 f 'STY 1
r i r ` i < I 1 3 -1 , $..: , 4L fir" g
I • `. - � •
..� � ..F t �-s .a .a?� _- +��:z+'.S"' � s5 i. : i ' .a : fi
Response:
See attached sketch for structural requirements at the louver opening. Louver opening shall be located to
avoid 6x6 post in wall. Top of louver elevation shall be determined by others.
Response From: TA; TMR To: Clyde Zahn / Scott Dekker / Chris Cudahy Date Rec'd:8 -26-10 Date Ret'd: 8 -26 -10
Date:
Signed by:
._
: —
em y,..'
6
.aa.n( c .
C .t z,...t..b lace
✓.. i.
i •
. ........ •
: •
.
y x Y. Y
I
r
. ,- ^ - • "(:... ,... ...II . . - , . • ' - ). '., ! 1 , ' • '
INb
y
G
,
_ .
..,. .
Z
.
Q
S�W� •
•
•
. " ' . 1‘\,...1.: " ... 1 ,1 . • i ; .
•
•
•
O 1 (8 93.Y.2.- 12 - NA •
M oP W Z o e 3' . S �N�?So,i . X 51 P YC
�. wCa Col c SY
• •
SN64'C1� u-'Cm 16P. .60 -110 r1 ... °
R-Y woc.f� • . ;. .
• . . I °IC.STfi,L
RFz k�122 Ln4CUtl OPNI� '� ;
. .
1M O SU ING NN $ (H KNO� l _. -rf b %. BY ?Itk DATE 9124/
CONSULTING ENGINEERS CHK BY DATE
7650 S.W. Beveland St, Suite 100 SOB NO 92 V
Tigard, Oregon 97223 SHEET OF
Phone (503) 443 -3900
•
•
. CONSTRUCTION RFI #146
nn
Project: The Knoll At Tigard From: Chris Cudahy
To: Carleton Hart Architecture
From: LMC Construction
Ben White
Date: 9/17/10
Re: Elevator Vent
1 Specification Section: 233700 Drawing Reference: M2.04 Detail: See below
Request:
1. Keyed Note 7 on page M2.04 calls out an elevator vent at the elevator shaft location. To ensure
this vent is clear of all elevator system components, it is necessary to move the vent to the top of
the elevator shaft, install it in the south wall just east (left in picture below) of the hoist beam (see
picture below — taken facing south). If this location is acceptable, please provide framing details
for the 26" x 36" vent which will interfere with the stud located between the hoist beam post &
east wall.
1
it:-.:::‘: —
) 4 �' i f 4
� t y �
r � µ �!
;k t. --, r
d 1' i
r
\, ' 't _ , ,,, 4,
'cl
-
ff .
;I '
L ______________ .• t
Response:
Proposed location is acceptable, see structural response.
Response From: Ben White To: Clyde Zahn / Scott Dekker / Chris Cudahy Date Rec'd: 09.17.10 Date Ret'd: 09.20.10
Signed by: Date: 09.20.10
RFI #146
:z CONS"' RUCT iON
Project: The Knoll At Tigard ' • From: Chris Cudahy
To: Carleton Hart Architecture
From: LMC Construction
$en White
Date: 9/17/10
Re: Elevator Vent
Specification Section: 233700 Drawing Reference: M2.04 Detail: See below
Request:
1, Keyed Note 7 on page M2.04 calls out an elevator vent at the elevator shaft location.
this vent is clear of all elevator system components, it is necessary to move the vent to To the ensure top of
the elevator shaft, install it in the south wall just east (left in picture below) of the hoist beam (see
picture below — taken facing south). If this location is acceptable, p lease provide framing details
for the 26" x 36" vent which will interfere with the stud located between the hoist beam post &
east wall. y{C�
T ry # }� YAK K;
t • x 1. is - 7'.•.. { �.,y. -L' _ �: • •
.. R
4 ' � h ' � 3 1
�Y } Y
J
�" i . % ,"f mo d
,_ _ z, .. m'
3 5 z F i Ot
',�-'p ',i' ��';''''''7494C:-..X4:,1"'''',:. 4, i
1
"F �r {
Response:
Provide typical header (3 1/2 x 7 1 /4 LSL) with (1) 2x6 trimmer and (1) 2x6 king stud at each end.
Response From:TA;TMR T Clyde Zahn / Scott Dekker / Chris Cudahy Date Rec'd:9 -20 - Date Ret'd: 9 -20 -10
Signed by: ?..- ~ � �. Date: l j ji Q
•
•
•
•
CONSTRUCTION
nn RFI #47R
Project: The Knoll At Tigard From: Chris Cudahy
To: Carleton Hart Architecture From: LMC Construction
Ben White Date: 07/06/10
Re: Balcony Door & Transom Window Spacing
Specification Section: 061000 Drawing Reference: 2/A4.01 & A9.10 Detail: See below
Request:
1. Per RFI #42, all unit balcony doors (type B) are to be revised to 3' -0" x 6' -8" (48 units total). The
6' -8" door will need a rough opening height of 82 ", ASI #1 shows a height to the bottom of the
transom window of 84 1 /z" (Sheet A9.10). This leaves a space of approximately 2 1 /2" between
the top of balcony door type B and the bottom of the transom window. Per 2/A4.01, there is to
be a 2x8 triple header between the top of door type B and transom window which will not fit in
the space provided. This 2 W space may also be difficult to trim and properly flash, please
provide direction.
Response:
2x8 triple header is not required, I understand the actual rough opening will allow 3 1/8" between door
and transom - Provide (2) 2x8s along entire transom sill as noted in 10/S4.1.
Flashing & trim will be similar to detail 5/A8.20
❑ Attachments
Response From: Ben White To: Clyde Zahn / Scott Dekker / Chris Cudahy Date Rec'd: 07.06.10 Date Ret'd: 07.06.10
Signed by: Date: 07.06.10