Loading...
CCDA Budget - FY2007-2008 r• CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY r im Tigard. rl R~-e m-- i, w.,, District - 1 o-4 •.'t0':, . CITY CENTER'DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET City of Tigard Fiscal Year 2007-2008 CITY CENTER ' DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET COMMITTEE Mark Haldeman Craig Dirksen, Chair' Rick Parker Gretchen Buehner, Board Member Katie: Schwab Sydney Sherwood, Board Member Jason Snider Tom Woodri#f, Board Member -Dena Struck `Nick Wilson;;Board Member Cameron James (Alternate) sa' , CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT QPMENTAGENCY, BOARD Cra'&`Dirksen,'Chair, Gretchen Buehner Sydney'Sherwood: r- .Ni& \X7ilsQn Tom Woodruff 1. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • S ,Craig. Prosser COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR .Tom+.Ggffee! . t REDEVELOPMENT-SENIOR PLANNER ` Phil Nachbar f. FINANCIAL and INFORMATION SERVICES' DIRECTOR Robert Sesnon ' . :<rc CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY City'of Tigard 13125 Hall Bbd. Tigard, OR 97223 503-639-4171 r• A LETTER FROM THE ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR To the Citizens of the City of Tigard: I submitted my Proposed Fiscal Year 2007-08 Budget to the Tigard City Center Development Agency Budget Committee on May 14, 2007. The Committee, made up of the Tigard City Center Development Agency- Board members and five citizen volunteers, reviewed the proposed budget, provided the opportunity for and received public comment, and subsequently approved the document before forwarding it to the City Center Development Agency for adoption. The Agency Board held an additional public hearing on June 12, 2007 before adopting the Fiscal Year 2007-08 Budget. This document represents the City Center Development Agency's first annual budget. As you are aware, in May of 2006 Tigard voters approved the formation of an Urban Renewal District encompassing the downtown and surrounding areas. With the formation of this district, future increases in property tax revenues from property within the area, called tax increment, will provide an important source of funding for a number of needed capital projects. The Agency has thus far made significant progress towards executing the Dow-ntoWn Implemen- tation Strategy approved by the Board in August of 2006. The Strategy identifies specific policies and actions to guide the work of staff, the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC), and project prioritization. Significant accomplishments during the 2006-07 fiscal year include the developmenr. of this Strategy, approval of a preliminary framework study for new land use regulations and design guidelines for Downtown, completion and approval of the Streetscape Plan for Downtown, and award of a contract for completion of a master plan for the Fanno Creek Park and a public plaza in Downtown. In addition to these accomplishments, the Agency recently received word that it had been awarded a $2.54 million Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP) grant from Metro to help fund the reconstruction of Main Street. It is anticipated that $475,000 of these funds will become available to us during the 2007-08 fiscal year, with the remainder to be received in FY 2010-11 or earlier. This budget reflects first year tax increment revenues of $56,000. The M1'I1) grant, along with $710,000 in loans from the City, will be used to fiord phase I of the ?Main Street GreenStreet Retrofit as well as a portion of the Burnham Street reconstruction project. Other downtown related projects planned for completion in the 2007-08 fiscal year include the completion of the Fanno Creek Park and Plaza master plan, the development and adoption of land use regulations, development of a new circulation plan, and the identification of key opportunities for public/private development partnerships. Due to limited Agency resources, over $3.7 million is also included in the City's Community Investment Program budget to help fund these and other Downtown related projects that would be initiated regardless of the Urban Renewal District. V, Thile it is anticipated that roughly $22 million in tax increment revenues may ultimately be generated by the Urban Renewal District during its 20 year life, the first few- years will not generate significant cash flows. Nevertheless, in order to gain the momentum required for the successful redevelopment of the downtown area,and the accomplishment of the established goals, certain - ONE ti%;j' J{i' -,5,~~,l. { ~•S. fin;' - 7 t F;y1A~'LEITER FROM THE EXECUTIVE' DIRECTOR, CONT'D y 't ys) 14 ~L~ft.Y~ . ,i :cataSSlystprolects,wtll n ed to be'completed in the near.future. Also current law, limits the use of i' `e tax mcrement_revenue's to the retirement of debt.. Since the District has just been formed, it will°be fit, . una ble t`_o sectire outside to fin_ai~cing for at 'least the' next two years and therefore will require the City d; P contribute funds4b help-pay`for these needed projects: For this reason the Agency has entered into ari:intergovernmental agreement with the City of Tigard to borrow the funds necessary to pay :for these'and other projects. Respectfully submitted;, - Craig Prosser-. 4't r :R, Executive Director:, Twu. - k CITY CENTER URBAN RENEE\AL DISTRICT Was Wa€r~gAk ~v K u; f 0; Won 5 of Q 6", g ~ _ { s ( --T, .sue - ~',z x ! wa"'~''``~• ~ ~v l c'`%° , v An ,S = -11 it, Al Yin- n a h f,R 0M Q 4, MAU AWAY los r -~Y a ~A:" •'k a'g 1111,0 s - MIA yg^s •°„uli 2 ? -4 v, t_,~f pus pow vo, § A -x Ewa - c } 4'` ,t P Way zy .a - 'tea to Yin, a 'o a r Lem W. A IN, > M,Y qwr v { 'L~- s aY ski _ - MIA nn "C E ~~ypy ;„ata~Z rx'..5t Sr . aP P 4 MIS h- - a' _ w tp v: % -a ^ ~ fir`? _ _ An, 6 34 Y.f '»r` jai x~, ~1' `'''a s yam, s =r - 'C ^ - - r t' ~ . 1~ -,~'~,s~ 1°: M1:, y,- ova 4'•.~, ~ s ; { -_4 S7 a, ~ru r ~3.':, t. ~ E ~ s : % ' mod, ~ A 9 ~ r•a- "~~r r ~ £ ~ ~ = z. §E, City Center a 4 JA ,y LAyl ~ j S Z B. _ d Nt 7 If 't; XS +tp4 x.Vibcen Renewal 3 { Disfr,act. t, b ` 3r SIC r } a ~ l' ~ Fall, _--l, i r TIdREI~ ~ ; , ~ , ! CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY FACTS r. „ • T ' h -13 Dlstrrct Formation Date ~d Ma 2006 r District Size (acres): 193.71 -~<District~Tax T`bt.Area (acres) 144 14 District Right- of- \Vay Area (acres.): 49,57 4 OP~ larozeri Tam Base (pct X005) p k r s`; $GG,510,$60 e' +s '-5 S - d^R>3~ Assesssed Value (Ocv'2007):. $70,501;512 nnual taxes levied (projected 2007)s 56n000 - . `k tf~• .:.t..•r PL_ _ , - ..te.. ..0r: ':w ,a ..h:~ .~,.k - is ~ ~.ae . , L Magnum Debt Limit: $22;000;000' ~DeUt ISSLled{ "f 2 R',w,5'€y-.-. Remaining Debt.Limit: $22,000;000 y FouR URBAN RENEWAL DEBT SERVICE FUND Actual Actual Revised Proposed Approved Adopted Description 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08 RESOURCES 300000 Beginning fund Balance so SO SO SO SO 50 Revenue 400000 Current Property Taxes SO SO SO 556,398 556,398 $56,398 401000 Prior Ycar "I a-,cs n 0 0 0 0 0 Total Property Taxes SO SO SO 556,398 X56398 556,398 470000 Interest Farnin,s SO SO SO 51,000 57.000 51,000 Total Interest & Rentals so SO SO 51,000 S1,000 S1,000 Total Revenue so SO SO 557,398 557,398 557,398 Transfer in from other funds Total transfer in from other funds SO SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL RESOURCES 50 SO SO S57,398 557,398 S57,398 REQUIREMENTS Operating Expenditures SO SO SO SO SO SO Debt Service so 50 50 SO SO SO Capital Improvements so SO SO SO SO SO Transfer out to other funds Urban Rencwal <:apict) Projccts fund So so $0 SO SO $0 Total transfer out to other funds SO so so SO SO SO Contingency Gencra6C(,n6ngencr SO $0 SO SO SO SO Total Contingency SO SO Sll so SO SO Total Budget SO SO SO SO SO SO Ending, Fund. Balance Undesignatcd fund lialanec so SO SO 557,398 557,398 S57,398 Total,Ending Fund Balance so $O SO Si7,398 S57,398 W,398 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS SO SO SO S57,398 $57,398 557,398 FIVE - V. Z URBAN, -RENEWAL'CAPIrAL, PROJECTS FUND Actual Actual Revised Proposed Approved Adopted Description 2004=O52005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2007-08 2007-08' RESOURCES 300000 Beginning Fund ]idlance W SO SO SO SO! SO Revenue 404000 Fedcral Grants SO 5o 50 S4,73,000 S475,000 S4-5,000 416000 l,ircrgcw rimicntal Rcvennc 0 0. 0 85.000 /1,000 1U00 Total-Other, Agencies SO SO SO SI,260,OW S1.785,OCk0 S1,185.000 q Total Revenue, SO' SO SO. 51,26'0;000 S8.18'51)00 51,185.000 Sv, Transfer in from, other funds Total transfer in from other funds so SO a 50 = -SO 'SO so TOTAL RESOURCES S0, SO„- S0 _ 5.1260,000` S1 185 000_-. 5,1185.000 REQUIRE 'Operating s - "0;. S0 0'.'.. S80000, S80';OOi) - S80:000i DebtiSen ice ; $0' SO = SO SO SO SO Capital Improvements, so, so, S0. 51118000" S1,105;000 S1,IO5.000 Transfer:out.to other:funds. Total transfer 6utto--other funds SO' Sp S0 S0. S0 SO Contingency r Gcncr.il Contingency, t $0 SO- ' SO SU S0 . SO' Total Contingency St) SOI S0. $0 S0 SO Tot_afBudget -So, so SO-. S1,2601:000 S1,185MO 51,185,000 Ending Fund' Balance L;nde,,igharcdJ=undd3alance, S0' SO S0 A_S(1 SO S0.1 s Total Ending Fund Balance so SO, S0' . SQ' s0 SO " r TOTAL REQUIREMENTS SO' .,So SO' 51,2-60000 S1-,185,000 S1,185MO 1 s. Six- d FISCAL YEAR, 2007-2008 URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS Burnham Street Reconstruction $535,000 Depending on the final design, it is anticipated that the Urban Renewal Agency will fund a portion of project costs due to additional street standards developed for the Downtown. The proposed budget for FY 07-08 anticipates the use of $535,000 in City funds for Burnham Street which will be repaid with Urban Renewal funds. Burnham Street from Hall Blvd. to Main Street will be completely redesigned and constructed. The design incorporates both design standards for a collector street and specific pedestrian- oriented features developed under the Downtown Comprehensive Streetscape plan. These include wider sidewalks, medians, bulb-outs at cross walks, and sustainable water quality design. The project includes widening Burnham Street between Main Street and Ash Avenue to a paved xvidth of 38 feet and between Ash Avenue and Hall Boulevard to 50 feet. Sidewalks, landscaped strips and on-street parking will be provided as part of the widening. In addition, a roundabout will be installed at the intersection of l Tall Boulevard and Ash Avenue. The final design and right-of-way acquisition for Burnham Street are scheduled to be completed in the summer of 2007. Construction is anticipated to begin in late summer or fall of 2007. Main Street Green St. Retrofit - Phase 1 $570,000 The Main Street project is multi-year andincludes comprehensive redesign and construction of the full length of Main Street. Phase 1 of the project will reconstruct the street in accordance with Green Street Standards for 1400 lineal feet of Main Street, from the Commuter Rail entrance to the southxest entrance at 99\\7 . It encompasses the entire, public right-of-Nvay (ROUX,) and includes streets, curbs, sidewalks, landscape, and drainage improvements. Design will be based on concept plans as approved in the Downtown Streetscape Plan. The City has approached METRO to see if Phase 1 funds may be moved up to FY 07-08. If this is accomplished, the Ciro- .rill need $95,000 in Cltti- match funds for receipt of 5475,000 in grant funds, to be used for construction drawings for the project: Once Phase 1 is completed, the City will apply for a second MTIP grant to undertake the second half of Main Street, from the Commuter Rail to the Greenburg Rd intersection. Total $1,105,000 SP.\'1?N -