Loading...
SDR1997-00001 £MVMi2111 S 6OEIVMOUDN 10000 L6U US NOTICE OF DECISION 411,‘ SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 97-0001 CITY OFTIOARD MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT Community DeveCopment Shaping A getter Community SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT Site Development Review SDR 97-0001 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 2,871 square foot restaurant with a drive through service aisle. APPLICANT: McDonald's Restaurant OWNER: Co-Trustees of the Stewart Trust 5000 SW Meadows Road (List available Upon Request) Lake Oswego, OR 97035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. LOCATION: The southwest corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 1 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department(503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall). 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Prior to issuance of the building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 40 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 4. The applicant's plans shall provide for the construction of a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. This improvement will need to provide for an extension of the two existing southbound travel lanes to a point where the proposed site access will be constructed. The westernmost lane should be converted into a right-turn only lane into the McDonald's site and the remaining southbound lane will continue past the site. Beyond the southern edge of the site access, the pavement width can taper down to 22 feet from centerline. The applicant will be permitted to sawcut the existing edge of asphalt and simply widen the pavement section as needed because the existing pavement was placed per City standards as a part of the City project. Other improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; b. curb; c. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff; d. six (6)-foot concrete sidewalk; e. street striping; f. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001-MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 2 g. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu- of undergrounding existing overhead utilities); h. street signs; and driveway apron. 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant's site plan shall be revised as necessary to indicate how the site access will be shared with the adjacent parcels to the west and south. 6. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for the common driveway. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 7. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water line relocation prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. The public improvement drawings shall include the detailed design of the water line work. 8. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City (Brian Rager), of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10 percent or less of the total tributary drainage volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile. If, indeed, there is a deficiency in the downstream system, the City will allow the applicant to construct the proposed on-site detention facility. 9. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 10. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 11. The applicant shall provide a geotechnical report, per Appendix Chapter 33 of the UBC, for the proposed grading slope construction. The recommendations of the report shall be incorporated into the final grading plan. A final construction supervision report shall be filed with the Building Division prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. (STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Official, 639-4171, ext. 311). NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 3 12. The applicant proposes to provide a Rhododendron planting along portions of SW Pacific Highway and SW 72nd Avenue to screen the parking lot from view of the adjoining right-of-ways. The applicant shall revise this planting to provide these shrubs or another form of screening along the entire length of the applicant's SW 72nd Avenue leasehold frontage. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 13. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of two additional parking lot trees that are dispersed within the parking lot. Parking has been provided within a total of three rows. Each row has 9-10 parking spaces. Because the rows of parking spaces are in excess of seven spaces each, an additional three finger planters will need to be accommodated. The applicant may also use other means so that one parking lot tree is provided for each seven parking spaces. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 14. The applicant shall obtain written approval from the franchise hauler for the location and design of the proposed trash and recycling enclosure. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 15. The plan indicates that 39,885 square feet is to be leased but did not indicate how many square feet exclusive of adjoining right-of-way is to be developed with landscaping. The applicant shall provide calculations that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the leasehold area is to be landscaped. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 16. No street trees have been proposed along SW Pacific Highway frontage, the plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the SW Pacific Highway frontage. One additional street tree shall also be provided along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage towards the SW Pacific Highway intersection. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 17. A security lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 18. Because the leasehold area develops a portion of the site approximately 320 to 330 feet from the SW Pacific Highway and no other walkways through the block exist further south, the site plan shall be revised to provide a walkway through the site along the common driveway to the site from SW 72nd Avenue. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 19. The applicant shall complete the required public improvements and submit as-built drawings for review and approval. 20. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 72nd Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu-of NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 4 • undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. 21. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained as approved per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: An existing detached, single-family residence is to the west of the portion of the property that is proposed to be developed with a McDonald's Restaurant use. The City has no record of any previous development applications for this portion of the property. Recently, approximately 2.02 acres of the southwestern corner of the same property was sold to TRI-MET and developed for use as a Park and Ride Lot. The land use case for the Park and Ride Lot decision is SDR 95-0007. Vicinity Information: Properties to the north, south, east, and west are zoned General Commercial (C-G). Surrounding areas are predominantly developed with commercial uses. The adjacent property to the west is developed with a commercial automotive repair use. To the south is the Act Ill Theater, and to the east of SW 72nd Avenue is a retail sales use. To the north of SW Pacific Highway is the Fred Meyer Shopping Center. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to lease 39,885 square feet of the remaining 3.67 acre parcel to develop a McDonald's Restaurant with a drive through service aisle. The property has frontage on SW Pacific Highway and SW 72nd Avenue. The site generally slopes away from SW Pacific Highway towards the Act III Theater property. The site slopes in elevation from approximately 264 feet at SW Pacific Highway, to 210 feet at the southerly property line. A drainage area along the southerly property line contains wetlands. The area to be developed is approximately 225 feet to the north of the existing wetlands. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001-MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 5 supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Alternatively, an applicant may specifically concur with the requirement for dedication of right-of-way to the public and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion of a waiver statement. The applicant specifically concurred with the requirement for dedication both within the applicant's narrative, and within the proposed public improvement plans. This rough proportionality analysis has provided for the applicants' convenience. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for a $2,871 square foot drive through restaurant is estimated to be $12,058.00. If a TIF fee were charged that covers 100% of the traffic impact the cost would be $36,174.00. The applicant has proposed to construct half ('/2) street improvements on their SW 72nd Avenue frontage. Southwest 72nd Avenue is designated as a Major Collector Street facility that accommodates traffic from adjoining local neighborhoods to access Major Collector and Arterial Streets. Because of the limited pavement width that needs to be added to SW 72nd Avenue, a construction cost of $100.00 per lineal foot has been estimated for required right-of-way dedication and improvements to SW 72nd Avenue. Assuming that approximately 320 feet will be improved, it is estimated that the developer will contribute a total of $32,000.00 ($100 x 320 feet of frontage). A TIF credit for this work is applicable because improvements to SW 72nd Avenue are listed as TIF eligible. Because the $32,000.00 transportation improvement cost is less than the $36,174.00 traffic impact of this project, the cost of all required street improvement requirements is less than the impact and, therefore, roughly proportional to the required Conditions of Approval within this staff report. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a restaurant with drive through service. This use is classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as an eating and Drinking Establishment Community Development Code Section 18.62.030 lists Eating and Drinking Establishments as a permitted use within the General Commercial Zoning District. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no minimum lot size requirement in the General Commercial (C-G) Zoning District An average lot width of 50 feet is required. Developments within the C-G Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. Although a portion of the property is proposed to be leased, the underlying property ownership is not reduced through this application. The existing average lot width of the leasehold area is approximately 170 feet. The plan indicates that 39,885 square feet is to be leased, but did not indicate how many square feet NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 6 exclusive of adjoining right-of-way is to be developed with landscaping. The applicant shall provide calculations that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the leasehold area is to be landscaped. Setbacks: Section 18.66.050 states that there are no setback requirements, except 30 feet shall be required where a commercial use within the district abuts a residential zoning district The site does not abut a residential zoning district, therefore, no specific setbacks are applicable other than parking lot screening standards, and clear vision requirements that are addressed elsewhere in this report. Building Height: Section 18.66.050 states that a maximum building height of 45 feet is allowed within the C-G Zoning District The narrative indicates that a maximum building height of 17 feet, 1 inch is proposed. The proposed height does not exceed the maximum limit of the underlying zoning district. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement is satisfied as the applicant has submitted a landscape plan indicating the number, type, and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed plan shows the provision of five (5) street trees along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage. The applicant has proposed to use a "Scarlet Sentinel Maple Tree" spaced at 30 feet on center. Based on their size at maturity, these trees are considered large specimens and, with one (1) exception, comply with street tree spacing standards. One (1) additional street tree will need to be provided on SW 72nd Avenue towards the intersection of SW Pacific Highway. No street trees have been proposed along SW Pacific Highway frontage. The plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the SW Pacific Highway frontage. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant proposes to provide a Rhododendron planting along portions of SW Pacific Highway and SW 72nd Avenue to screen the parking lot from view of the adjoining right-of-ways. The applicant shall revise this planting to provide these shrubs or another form of screening, along the entire length of the applicants SW 72nd Avenue leasehold frontage. The Landscape Plan provides three (3) parking lot trees that are dispersed within three finger planters. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of two (2) additional parking lot trees that are dispersed within the parking lot. Parking has been provided within a total of three NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 7 (3) rows. Each row has 9-10 parking spaces. Because the rows of parking spaces are in excess of seven (7) spaces each, an additional three finger planter will need to be accommodated (or other means) so that one (1) parking lot tree is provided for each seven (7) parking spaces. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a commercial development abuts a residential structure, the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1. At least one (1) row of trees shall be planted. They shall be; not less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous trees and five (5) feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2. In addition, at least 10, five-gallon shrubs or; 20, one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover, or spread with bark mulch. The lease areas adjoin a vacant residence that is on the same property, but not within the proposed lease area. During discussions with the property owners at the pre-application conference, the owner states that the existing residence has been vacant for several years. Because a detached, single-family residence is a non-conforming use within the General Commercial Zoning District. Section 18.132.040 (B)(1)(d) states that this residence cannot now be re-occupied for use as a single-family residence. For this reason, no screening and buffering are applicable between the residence and the proposed restaurant site. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. Obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3), and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The site and landscape improvements, as proposed, comply with this criteria as indicated on the plan submittal. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(C) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space per 50 square feet of dining room area plus one for every two employees for Restaurants. The floor plan provides approximately 900 square feet of dining room area. The applicant intends to have 15 employees per shift. Based on these numbers, a minimum of 26 parking spaces are required. A total of 27 spaces have been provided, in satisfaction of this requirement. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 8 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADAI, which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires two disabled parking spaces if 26 to 50 parking spaces are provided. This section is satisfied as the proposed site plan shows the provision of two (2) disabled person parking spaces. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. A minimum of 26 parking spaces are required to serve this development. A bicycle parking rack was provided which addressed this requirement. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one (1) access drive with a width of 24 feet, thereby, satisfying this requirement. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking. This shall be provided either by a minimum of a six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The plan shows pedestrian walkway connections from building entrances with frontage on SW 72nd Avenue and SW Pacific Highway, in compliance with the required dimensional standards. Because access is to be provided from SW 72nd Avenue, this plan as proposed, is in excess of the minimum standards. Signs: Section 18.114.130(C) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G zone. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Community Development Department. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclable prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the design of the facility location, and its compatibility with their servicing equipment. Site Development Review: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) (Site Development Review - Approval Standards) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150 and NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 9 • 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The portion of the property that is to be leased is currently undeveloped. An adjoining portion of the property is developed with a detached, single-family residence and a detached garage. The site also, currently has several trees; but none within the area that is to be leased. The plan proposes to remove trees that are presently within the ODOT SW Pacific Highway right-of-way. Community Development Code Section 18.150 applies to trees on private property, therefore, the removal of the tree is under the State's jurisdiction. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This proposal does not abut a use that requires a buffer, as required in the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130). This criteria will be satisfied as addressed in the buffer matrix section below. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The plans show the provision of landscaping that is intended to provide screening in accordance with this section. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. This requirement has not been addressed because the applicant's plan sets did not provide details on security lighting. A security lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 10 • existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a plan that identifies all existing trees greater than six (6)-inches in caliper. The site plan indicates that the existing trees that are to be removed are within the ODOT right-of-way. The applicant states that no other trees are to be removed within the proposed leasehold area. The tree removal standards do not apply to trees within the right-of-way, therefore, no mitigation is required for the removal of these trees. Tigard Triangle Street and Pedestrian Accessway Standards: On December 30, 1996 the City Council adopted new zoning, street, and pedestrian accessway standards for the Tigard Triangle through Ordinance No. 96-42. These standards are applicable to this site because this application was submitted on February 12, 1997, and is within the area described as the Tigard Triangle. The new requirements state that a pedestrian accessway shall be provided through blocks at distances no greater than 330 feet. Because the leasehold area develops a portion of the site approximately 320 to 330 feet from SW Pacific Highway, and no other walkways through the block exist further south, the site plan shall be revised to provide a walkway through the site along the common driveway from SW 72nd Avenue. It is anticipated that future development will extend the walkway to the TRI-MET Park and Ride Lot in the future. Because future development will be required to design the walkway to the new Tigard Triangle Design Standards, the applicant should consider designing the walkway to meet these standards although these requirements do not apply to this application. A new right-of-way section for SW 72nd Avenue was also adopted February 25, 1997. Although not required, the applicant is also encouraged to redesign their SW 72nd Avenue frontage to conform with the new right-of-way section. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections' 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains), (Storm Water Quality), (Grading and Erosion Control) shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site is adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, a Major Collector Street, and SW Pacific Highway an Arterial. Traffic Impact A traffic analysis was submitted by Kittelson & Associates, dated October, 1996, which addresses the potential traffic impacts from this development. This project is expected to generate approximately 1,845 daily trips, of which 145 trips will be during the typical weekday a.m. peak hour and 95 trips will be during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Of the 145 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 95 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, approximately 75 and 55 trips, respectively, represent net new trips on the transportation system. In other words, roughly 50% of the generate traffic will be new trips to the system. The other 50% will be existing pass-by traffic. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 11 The followi g intersections in the area were analyzed for impact from this development: 1. Tigard Cinemas Access Driveway/SW Pacific Highway; 2. Southwest 72nd Avenue/SW Pacific Highway; and 3. Southwest 68th Parkway-SW 69th Avenue/SW Pacific Highway. The traffic analysis indicates that after buildout of this project, all study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The traffic engineer indicates that the proposed access location on SW 72nd Avenue maintains adequate spacing from the signalized intersection at SW Pacific Highway. With the addition of the traffic from this project, the queuing on the northbound approach to the signal is not expected to significantly impact the operation of the driveway during either the a.m. or p.m. weekday peak hours. SW 72nd Avenue This major collector street was partially improved as a part of the City's improvement of the intersection at SW Pacific Highway. There are no curbs or sidewalk adjacent to this site and the pavement width is not built out to the ultimate requirement for a Major Collector street. The right-of-way (ROW) required for a Major Collector street is between 60 and 80 feet. Based on the high volume of traffic on this facility and the need for multiple turning lanes at intersections, the City has determined that 80 feet should be required. The applicant's plan indicates they will dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 40 feet west of centerline, which will satisfy the ROW requirement. The roadway was partially improved adjacent to this site as a part of the City project at the intersection of SW Pacific Highway. As a part of that project, ODOT required the City to build two westbound left turn lanes on SW Pacific Highway at the intersection. Because of these dual left turn lanes, there is a need for two southbound travel lanes on SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant's traffic analysis did not address this issue. The City's project was only able to construct two southbound lanes for a distance of approximately 130 feet south of the SW Pacific Highway intersection. The existing pavement width from centerline varies from 33 feet from the SW Pacific Highway intersection to a point near the middle of the site frontage, to approximately 18 feet at the very southern edge of the site. Where the 33-foot section tapers down, the two southbound lanes must merge into one lane. With the additional trip generation from this site, there is a concern that this short distance will cause merging conflicts for traffic. To avoid these safety problems, Staff recommends the applicant extend the two southbound lanes further south. It would seem feasible to convert the westernmost southbound lane into a right-turn only into the McDonald's site and the other southbound lane could continue south past the site. Beyond the site driveway, the roadway could taper down to the standard major collector pavement section (22 feet from centerline). The City Engineer will need to review and approve a detailed design of this street improvement. If these improvements are constructed by the applicant, then Staff would support the application. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 12 SW Pacific Highway This facility is under ODOT jurisdiction and is improved with curb and sidewalk adjacent to this site. ODOT has submitted comments to the City with regard to this application and has indicated that no additional ROW is required to be dedicated and no further improvements are required adjacent to this site. Site Access As stated above, the traffic study indicated that the spacing from the SW Pacific Highway intersection is adequate for the new driveway. Staff concurs with the traffic study findings and supports the driveway location. However, the application indicates that the driveway will be a shared access between this site and the adjacent parcels to the west and south. Based on the preliminary grading plan, it appears there will be a grade differential of 10 to 15 feet between the drive aisle and the properties south and west. The plan does not address how this driveway could be used by these adjacent sites. The City has an interest in limiting the number of driveways on a major collector and would recommend the applicant be required to share this driveway with the adjacent parcels. Therefore, the applicant should revise the site plan to show how access to the adjacent parcels will be provided. Prior to construction, the applicant should record a joint access and maintenance agreement for the driveway. WATER: There is an existing 12-inch public water line that crosses through an existing utility easement adjacent to the north property line of this site. The applicant has stated that they are coordinating with ODOT with respect to vacation of that easement so a portion of the 12-inch water line can be relocated to accommodate their site plan. ODOT's Region 1 office stated that they have not been contacted with respect to the utility easement. The easement area is within the old abandoned ROW segment for SW Villa Ridge, a former frontage road that was vacated several years ago by ODOT when the City modified the intersection at SW 72nd Avenue and SW Pacific Highway. Often, when ROW is vacated, a public utility easement is preserved to cover all public lines that may fall within that area. It appears that the applicant will need to coordinate with ODOT in order to vacate that easement. Regarding the proposed water line relocation. This water line lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) jurisdiction. The applicant will need to obtain any necessary permit/approval from the Water. District prior to issuance of City permits. A detailed design of the relocation shall also be included with the public improvement drawings that will be submitted to the City Engineering Department. The applicant shall provide evidence that a permit/approval has been obtained from the Water District prior to issuance of the Engineering permit. The applicant proposes to dedicate a new water line easement to cover all portions of the water line that will cross this site. The easement shall be approved by TVWD. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 13 • SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing eight inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 72nd Avenue that is available to serve this site. The plan indicates a new service line will be extended into the site from this main line. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm water from this site is proposed to be directed to the southern end of the site where it would be detained, treated and released into the storm system in SW 72nd Avenue. Before the City can recommend detention, the applicant will need to provide a downstream analysis of the existing storm system to determine if there is a deficiency that would require detention. If no deficiency exists, the City would rather the applicant did not detain the storm water. The analysis will need to be reviewed by the Engineering Department. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated previously, the applicant proposes to construct an on-site pond facility to treat the storm water from this site. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity that accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW 72nd Avenue. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu-of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 14 SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Police Department, Maintenance Services Department, and Building Division have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this application and have offered the following comments: According to the traffic report, the subject intersection is expected to operate at near capacity (v/c=0.95). The proposed development will cause this situation to deteriorate further. The stacking on the south leg of the SW 72nd Avenue intersection needs to be reviewed because it is not adequate for right turners. Currently, two westbound left-turn lanes feed into the southbound exit lanes on the SW 72nd Avenue intersection, which taper into one lane within 150 feet. ODOT recommends that McDonald's be conditioned to construct half street improvements along their frontage on SW 72nd Avenue to provide for a future five- lane section. Doing so would extend the southbound exit lanes, making the dual left turn off of SW Pacific Highway more effective and would provide more storage space northbound. The need to expand SW Pacific Highway to a seven lane facility has been identified in numerous studies. This need was documented in the findings made by the City for their recent legislative rezoning of the surrounding Tigard Triangle Area. Therefore, ODOT recommends that the City condition the applicant to dedicate sufficient right-of-way, or at the minimum, provide adequate setback to accommodate this planned widening of SW Pacific Highway. The site plan appears to suggest that the McDonald's access is through adjacent property, and may also be used in the future by the adjacent property when developed. The applicant should provide plans for future access with the adjacent lot fully developed. It is desirable that McDonald's provide for future relocation of the access, further south, to reduce conflicts in the vicinity of the highway at such time as this adjacent lot develops. In Figure 2 of the traffic report, the lane geometry for the eastbound approach on SW 74th Avenue needs to be changed to a through and a through-right lane. The applicant contacted ODOT, District 2A regarding proposed tree removal on ODOT right-of-way. Jane Estes, Permit Specialist, sent an application for tree removal and minor grading on January 2, 1997 but has not been signed and returned, so as yet, no permit has been issued for the work. We do not foresee any obstacles to the permit issuance when they do return it. However, no work on ODOT right-of-way will be allowed until the application is returned and the permit processed. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 15 • Page 6 of the application narrative states that the applicant will be placing directional signs in the visual clearance area. If this area is on ODOT right-of-way, the only private signs that will be allowed would be the Travel Information Council signs (on the blue background). The TIC can be reached (503) 378-4508 for application information. Page 7 of the narrative states that the applicant is working with ODOT to vacate the existing utility easement. This office has not been contacted about any utility easements and no application for relocating the 12-inch water main has been received. Utilities are not granted easements, but are given permits to be on right-of-way. ODOT recommends the following Conditions of Approval: 1. ODOT permit for all work in the SW Pacific Highway right-of-way, including tree removal, grading and utility relocation is required prior to commencement of construction. Application to be made to Jane Estes, Permit Specialist, ODOT District 2A. at 229-5002. 2. No signs permitted in the ODOT right-of-way, except for those approved by the Travel Information Council. 3. Applicant shall construct half street improvements along their frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. 4. Applicant to dedicate right-of-way on SW Pacific Highway to accommodate future widening for a seven (7) lane section. 5. Crossover easement to the property to the south is required to accommodate future potential relocation of the McDonald's access on SW 72nd Avenue. ODOT submitted a follow-up letter which revised their original comments as follows: We have further reviewed this proposal and it appears that ODOT owns adequate right-of-way for potential widening of SW Pacific Highway. However, the City should not calculate the proposed landscaping in the right-of-way to meet design standards as it is likely that the ROW will be utilized by the department in the future. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001-MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 16 The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3). The Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: SANITARY SEWER: Each lot within the development shall be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER: Each lot within the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrologic analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream conveyance does not have capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA: A "Sensitive Area" (exists) may exist. Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44, separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. NOTE: Because Sensitive Areas are located along the southern portion of the property, no wetlands delineation has been recommended. The developer must provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of a storm conveyance should be provided. No other comments or objections have been received. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001-MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 17 SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON APRIL 23, 1997 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON APRIL 23, 1997. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. April 10. 1997 PRE ARED BY: Mark Robert DATE Associate Planner, AICP i A _ April 10, 1997 AP" OVED BY: �c and Bewersdo . � DATE Planning Manager r1c rphvnark\sdr97-01.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 18 14 1 `'' rcAl : 3 A G . ,. ' , q, P P , " :. � , V2.\ t ' v tc �.. . 1 1 / i �`0,••• •••••:'...,�fr . ' . / ircwn►ta ! t 1 , ),•' N f�n•4.•• '‘ 1 -• •....1. et.-:1,.....::. *.:,-,.e•' • >-' , .., 41,0 h.II:* ra !.•-•.1 , \ 1.11; \\ ..., • . �' !� i , �d�o .ate~ Lu 10,, Ifrfg Q LLeeeee iiiiiiiiiG4aa • .t. \ 1 , lit • ••.00,a.owr.. • •••••.• t;i...;;i:�• .•kfJHf I -� S� rl�{ • Jr7)/Sl1.EA'41N0'IMP � i* - i1 /1 ^ . . _,.:: , ` (0041! - , ,.......,:**-z::::0 ni ., IN i < • ."•410. ..1;4:0#440 . =-44j,/,,v416--0,' • s: I [.d ' — 1 , (1. •,.,\; -..,...........-:•., ...f:: 1 0 • .rr * •9err- •waW M►.Y MCA •► I 1 V PLOT PLAN ) CASE No. EXHIBITP �g McDonald's Restaurant SDR 97-0001 IJIHiHi [ ill III _ Ij ST ■■ . .IN 1 . i . ' ----- i i _ ,sp.. ' - y -■■ I ii 414 (I.= 74 -- CU i ma alai • El ______________ E 1 ______ 1 . 1 , Ai 1 1 i.e..> k, ' . . t ' i al CL Q� 4111k. Mk A ____---,--- T41----- NURXIII < ii.... BA1i S 0 pm% i 1 1 ,__________, 1111111 I _-1 1 Vicinity Map SOH 97-0001 - j Note: Map is not to scale E N McDonald's Restaurant on 99W&72nd REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: April 10, 1997 TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 97-0001, McDonald's Restaurant on 99W & 72nd Avenue Description: This proposal is for a restaurant with sit-down seating and drive-through service at the southwest corner of SW 72nd Avenue and Highway 99W (WCTM 1S1 36DB, Tax Lot 2600). Findings: 1 . Streets: This site lies adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, a major collector street, and Highway 99W, an arterial. Traffic Impact A traffic analysis was submitted by Kittelson & Associates, dated October, 1996, which addresses the potential traffic impacts from this development. This project is expected to generate approximately 1,845 daily trips, of which 145 trips will be during the typical weekday a.m. peak hour and 95 trips will be during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Of the 145 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 95 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, approximately 75 and 55 trips, respectively, represent net new trips on the transportation system. In other words, roughly 50% of the generate traffic will be new trips to the system. The other 50% will be existing pass-by traffic. The following intersections in the area were analyzed for impact from this development: 1. Tigard Cinemas Access Driveway/Highway 99W 2. SW 72nd Avenue/Highway 99W 3. SW 68th Parkway-SW 69th Avenue/Highway 99W. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0001 McDonald's at 99W/72nd PAGE 1 The traffic analysis indicates that after buildout of this project, all study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The traffic engineer indicates that the proposed access location on SW 72nd Avenue maintains adequate spacing from the signalized intersection at Highway 99W. With the addition of the traffic from this project, the queuing on the northbound approach to the signal is not expected to significantly impact the operation of the driveway during either the a.m. or p.m. weekday peak hours. SW 72nd Avenue This major collector street was partially improved as a part of the City's improvement of the intersection at Highway 99W. There are no curbs or sidewalk adjacent to this site and the pavement width is not built out to the ultimate requirement for a major collector street. The right-of-way (ROW) required for a major collector street is between 60 and 80 feet. Based on the high volume of traffic on this facility and the need for multiple turning lanes at intersections, the City has determined that 80 feet should be required. The applicant's plan indicates they will dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 40 feet west of centerline, which will satisfy the ROW requirement. The roadway was partially improved adjacent to this site as a part of the City project at the intersection of 99W. As a part of that project, ODOT required the City to build two westbound left turn lanes on Highway 99W at the intersection. Because of these dual left turn lanes, there is a need for two southbound travel lanes on SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant's traffic analysis did not address this issue. The City's project was only able to construct two southbound lanes for a distance of approximately 130 feet south of the 99W intersection. The existing pavement width from centerline varies from 33 feet from the 99W intersection to a point near the middle of the site frontage, to approximately 18 feet at the very southern edge of the site. Where the 33-foot section tapers down, the two southbound lanes must merge into one lane. With the additional trip generation from this site, there is a concern that this short distance will cause merging conflicts for traffic. To avoid these safety problems, Staff recommends the applicant extend the two southbound lanes further south. It would seem feasible to convert the westernmost southbound lane into a right-turn only into the McDonald's site and the other southbound lane could continue south past the site. Beyond the site driveway, the roadway could taper down to the standard major collector pavement section (22 feet from centerline). The City Engineer will need to review and approve a detailed design of this street improvement. If these ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0001 McDonald's at 99W/72nd PAGE 2 improvements are constructed by the applicant, then Staff would support the application. Highway 99W This facility is under ODOT jurisdiction and is improved with curb and sidewalk adjacent to this site. ODOT has submitted comments to the City with regard to this application and has indicated that no additional ROW is required to be dedicated and no further improvements are required adjacent to this site. Site Access As stated above, the traffic study indicated that the spacing from the 99W intersection is adequate for the new driveway. Staff concurs with the traffic study findings and supports the driveway location. However, the application indicates that the driveway will be a shared access between this site and the adjacent parcels to the west and south. Based on the preliminary grading plan, it appears there will be a grade differential of 10 to 15 feet between the drive aisle and the properties south and west. The plan does not address how this driveway could be used by these adjacent sites. The City has an interest in limiting the number of driveways on a major collector and would recommend the applicant be required to share this driveway with the adjacent parcels. Therefore, the applicant should revise the site plan to show how access to the adjacent parcels will be provided. Prior to construction, the applicant should record a joint access and maintenance agreement for the driveway. 2. Water: There is an existing 12-inch public water line that crosses through an existing utility easement adjacent to the north property line of this site. The applicant has stated that they are coordinating with ODOT with respect to vacation of that easement so a portion of the 12-inch water line can be relocated to accommodate their site plan. ODOT's Region 1 office stated that they have not been contacted with respect to the utility easement. The easement area is within the old abandoned ROW segment for SW Villa Ridge, a former frontage road which was vacated several years ago by ODOT when the City modified the intersection at 72nd Avenue and 99W. Often, when ROW is vacated, a public utility easement is preserved to cover all public lines that may fall within that area. It appears that the applicant will need to coordinate with ODOT in order to vacate that easement. Regarding the proposed water line relocation. This water line lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) jurisdiction. The applicant will need to obtain any necessary permit/approval from the Water District prior ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0001 McDonald's at 99W/72nd PAGE 3 to issuance of City permits. A detailed design of the relocation shall also be included with the public improvement drawings that will be submitted to the City Engineering Department. The applicant shall provide evidence that a permit/approval has been obtained from the Water District prior to issuance of the Engineering permit. The applicant proposes to dedicate a new water line easement to cover all portions of the water line that will cross this site. The easement shall be approved by TVWD. 3. Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 72nd Avenue that is available to serve this site. The plan indicates a new service line will be extended into the site from this main line. 4. Storm Drainage: Storm water from this site is proposed to be directed to the southern end of the site where it would be detained, treated and released into the storm system in SW 72nd Avenue. Before the City can recommend detention, the applicant will need to provide a downstream analysis of the existing storm system to determine if there is a deficiency that would require detention. If no deficiency exists, the City would rather the applicant did not detain the storm water. The analysis will need to be reviewed by the Engineering Department. 5. Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated previously, the applicant proposes to construct an on-site pond facility to treat the storm water from this site. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0001 McDonald's at 99W/72nd PAGE 4 6. Grading and Erosion Control: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91- 47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. 7. Existing Overhead Utility Lines: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW 72nd Avenue. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $ 27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. Recommendations: THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT: Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171). 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall. 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0001 McDonald's at 99W/72nd PAGE 5 executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Prior to issuance of the building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 40 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 4. The applicant's plans shall provide for the construction of a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. This improvement will need to provide for an extension of the two existing southbound travel lanes to a point where the proposed site access will be constructed. The westernmost lane should be converted into a right-turn only lane into the McDonald's site and the remaining southbound lane will continue past the site. Beyond the southern edge of the site access, the pavement width can taper down to 22 feet from centerline. The applicant will be permitted to sawcut the existing edge of asphalt and simply widen the pavement section as needed because the existing pavement was placed per City standards as a part of the City project. Other improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage b. curb c. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff d. 6 foot concrete sidewalk e. street striping f. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer g. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu of undergrounding existing overhead utilities) h. street signs driveway apron 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant's site plan shall be revised as necessary to indicate how the site access will be shared with the adjacent parcels to the west and south. 6. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for the common driveway. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0001 McDonald's at 99W/72nd PAGE 6 7. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water line relocation prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. The public improvement drawings shall include the detailed design of the water line work. 8. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City (Brian Rager), of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10 percent or less of the total tributary drainage volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile. If, indeed, there is a deficiency in the downstream system, the City will allow the applicant to construct the proposed on-site detention facility. 9. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 10. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 11. The applicant shall provide a geotechnical report, per Appendix Chapter 33 of the UBC, for the proposed grading slope construction. The recommendations of the report shall be incorporated into the final grading plan. A final construction supervision report shall be filed with the Building Division prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. (STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Official, 639-4171, ext. 311). THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 12. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall complete the required public improvements and submit as-built drawings for review and approval. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0001 McDonald's at 99W/72nd PAGE 7 13. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 72nd Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu of undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. APPROVED: kf'lil"`"" d Greg Berry, Acting City Engineer is\eng\brianr\sdr97-01.bdr ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR 97-0001 McDonald's at 99W/72nd PAGE 8 04/09/97 0 8:4 2 1T5037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 U 001/001 (] Oregon April 9, 1997 �� Data li OP payee PoiR 1 Fax Nato I I — To rn �°—ob et DEPARTMENT OF City of Tigard Fax° (04, 7 TRANSPORTATION Planning Department F.om ,Dry,v S 13125 SW Hall Boulevard p'a".'rj 31 - 42 e ion 1 Tigard, OR 97223 FILE CODE: Att:. Mark Roberts Re: SDR 97-0001 McDonald's on 99W @ 72nd Thank you for providing ODOT the opportunity to participate in this site design review. The subject property is located on Pacific Highway/99W. The Oregon Highway Plan (1991), has designated 99W as a facility of Statewide importance, with the management objective "to provide for safe and efficient _ - _ high to moderate-speed operations with limited interruptions of flow in urban and urbanizing areas." We have further reviewed this proposal and it appears that ODOT owns adequate right of way for potential future widening of 99W. However, the city should not calculate the proposed landscaping in the right of way to meet design standards as it is likely that the ROW will be utilized by the department in the foreseeable future. Please contact me at 731-8258 if you have any questions regarding the above. We.would appreciate receiving a copy of the Decision and final Findings on this case. /01/04.- Marah Danielson, Planner Development Review cc: Martin Jensvold, Sonya Kazen, and Simon Eng, ODOT Region 1 Jane Estes and Bob Schmidt, ODOT District 2A 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 Form 734-1850(11/94) FAX (503) 731-8259 RECEIVED PLANN.. / March 12, 1997 MAR 14 1997 e- CiTVOFTIGARD DEPARTMENT OF City of Tigard TRANSPORTATION Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Region 1 Tigard, OR 97223 Att: Mark Roberts FILE CODE: Re: SDR 97-0001 McDonald's on 99W @ 72nd PLA9-2A-TIG-1W Thank you for providing ODOT the opportunity to participate in this site design review. The subject property is located on Pacific Highway/99W. The Oregon Highway Plan (1991), has designated 99W as a facility of Statewide importance, with the management objective "to provide for safe and efficient...high to moderate-speed operations with limited interruptions of flow in urban and urbanizing areas." We have reviewed the Kittelson traffic impact study, and the project narrative which was submitted by the Applicant. Our comments are as follows: According to the traffic report, the subject intersection is expected to operate at near capacity (v/c=0.95). The proposed development will cause this situation to deteriorate further. The stacking on the south leg of the 72nd intersection needs to be reviewed because it is not adequate for right-turners. Currently, two westbound left-turn lanes feed into two southbound exit lanes on the 72nd intersection, which taper to one lane within 150 feet. ODOT recommends that McDonald's be conditioned to construct half street improvements along their frontage on 72nd to provide for a future five-lane section. Doing so would extend the southbound exit lanes, making the dual left-turn off of 99W more effective and would provide more storage space northbound. The need to expand 99W to a seven lane facility has been identified in numerous studies. This need was documented in the findings made by the City for their recent legislative rezoning of the surrounding Tigard Triangle Area. Therefore, ODOT recommends that the City condition the Applicant to dedicate sufficient right of way, or at the minimum provide adequate setback to accommodate, this planned future widening of 99W. The site plan appears to suggest that the McDonald's access is through adjacent' property, and may also be used in future by the adjacent property when '8- 123 NW Flanders Portland, OR 97209-4037 (503) 731-8200 Form 734-1850(11/94) FAX (503) 731-8259 City of Tigard: SDR97-0001/McDonald's 99W 2 ODOT Response 3/12/97 developed. The Applicant should provide plans for future access with the adjacent lot fully developed. It is desirable that McDonald's provide for future relocation of the access further south to reduce conflicts in the vicinity of the highway, at such time as this adjacent lot develops. In Figure 2 of the traffic report, the lane geometry for the eastbound approach on 74th Avenue needs to be changed to a through and a through-right lane. The Applicant contacted ODOT District 2A regarding proposed tree removal on ODOT right of way. Jane Estes, Permit Specialist, sent an application for tree removal and minor grading on January 2, 1997, but it has not been signed and returned, so as yet no permit has been issued for the work. We do not foresee any obstacles to the permit issuance when they do return it, however no work on ODOT right of way will be allowed until the application is returned and the permit processed. Page 6 of the application narrative states that the applicant will be placing directional signs in the visual clearance area. If this area is on ODOT right of way, the only private signs that will be allowed would be the Travel Information Council signs (on the blue background). The TIC can be reached (503) 378-4508 for application information. Page 7 of the narrative states that the applicant is working with ODOT to vacate the existing utility easement. This office has not been contacted about any utility easements, and no application for relocating the existing 12" water main has been received. Utilities are not granted easements, but are given permits to be on right-of-way. ODOT recommends the following Conditions of Approval: • ODOT permit for all work in the 99W right of way, including tree removal, grading and utility relocation is required prior to commencement of construction. N pplication to be made to: Jane EcteC Perr.mit Specialis+ ODOT District 2A at 229-5002. • No signs permitted in the ODOT right of way, except for those approved by the Travel Information Council. • Applicant to construct half street improvements along their frontage on 72nd to provide for a future five-lane section. • Applicant to dedicate right of way on 99W to accommodate future widening for a 7 lane section. • City of Tigard: SDR97-0001/McDonald's 99W 3 ODOT Response 3/12/97 • Crossover easement to the property to the south is required to accommodate future potential relocation of the McDonald's access on SW 72nd. If you have any questions on the above, please contact me at (503) 731-8282. Martin Jensvold, Sr. Traffic Analyst, at 731-8219, can provide additional information on right of way dedication needs. i i -A___ -- Sonya Kazen, Development Review Coordinator cc: Jane Estes, ODOT District 2A Bob Schmidt, ODOT District 2A Martin Jensvold, ODOT Region 1 Sijjad Rasheed, ODOT Region 1 Marah Danielson, ODOT Region 1 devrev12A1mcdon99w.doc I n 1" TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE c \*-- FIRE PREVENTION ,c, u 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O.Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076. (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538 4RF&RESGJ March 19, 1997 RECEIVED PLANNING MAR 2 4 1997 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Division CITY E 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: McDonald's Restaurant 99W & 72nd SDR 97-90001 File Number: 1415-97 Dear Mark: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. Plans for the above noted project are not approved. Please address the following items and resubmit plans to this office for review and approval. The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1) "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives Mark Roberts March 19, 1997 Page 2 The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3) If I can be of any further assistance to you, please feel free to contact me at 526-2469 referring to the above noted file number. Sincerely, 1 Gene Birchill, D FM Plans Examiner GB:kw cc: Lon Taylor McDonald's Corporation 5000 SW Meadows Rd., suite 200 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 REQUEST FOR CI ►► S PLANNING CITY OF TIGARD pECEIVED n M a (� U U I ` Community�DeveCopment lUr ShapingA Better Community MAR 2, 0 1997 DATE: March 10,1991 MAR 1 CITY OF TIGARD TO: Lee Walker,USA/SWM Program By FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts[x3171 Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:15031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W&72ND A request to build a restaurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General ' Commercial (C-G). The General Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62S, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 20. 1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Please provide the foil-owing information)Name of Persons]Commenting \ ` IPhone Numbertsl: ° - �`t+ � SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W/72ND PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ,/ ' W.. .yin , vv UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY MEMORANDUM DATE: March 19, 1997 TO: Mark Roberts, City of Tigard FROM: Julia Huffman, USA SUBJECT: McDonald's Restaurant on 99W &72nd, SDR 97-0001 SANITARY SEWER Each lot within the development should be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewerage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER Each lot within the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to uphill adjacent properties,or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream storm conveyance does not have the capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA A "Sensitive Area" exists (may exist). Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44 separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. The sensitive area shall be identified on plans. is 155 North First Avenue, Suite 270,MS 10 Phone:503/648-8621 Hillsboro,Oregon 97124 FAX:503/640-3525 TVF&R File Number 10) GRADE; Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15 percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet.(UFC Sec.902.2.2.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level(maximum 5%) with the exception of crowning for water run-off. I I)PAINTED CURBS: Fire apparatus access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow and marked"NO PARKING FIRE LANE"at each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high.(UFC Sec.901.4.5.2) .12)COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS-MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS; The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fine protection systems. There shall not be less than one (I) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute(GPM) required fine flow and one (I) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.1) 7\ 13) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS; No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an approved fire appatatus access roadway. (UFC Sec.903.4.2.1) 14) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hydrants for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways. Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.2) 15) FIRE HYDRANT DISTANCE FROM AN ACCESS ROAD; Fire hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an approved fire apparatus access roadway.(UFC Sec.903.42.4) • 16) FIRE HYDRANT / FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire department connection(FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5) FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief.(1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code,Sec.904.1.1) 17)FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS ON BUILDINGS: Fire department connections shall not be located on the building that is being protected.(UFC Sec.903.4.2.5) . y 18) COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute(GPM)or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office.(UFC Sec.903.3) 19)SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS-REQUIRED FIRE FLOW; The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s)are 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-III-A-I.(UFC Appendix Ill-A, Sec. 5) 20) RURAL BUILDINGS - REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: Required fire flow for rural buildings shall be calculated in accordance with National Fire Protection Association Standard 1231. Please contact the Fire Marshal's office for special help and other requirements that will apply.(UFC Sec.903.3) 21) ACCESS_AND FIREFIGHTING WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION.: Approved fire apparatus access roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704) 22) KNOX BOX; A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an application and instructions regarding installation and placement. 23)REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: Please contact the Fire Marshal's office at the appropriate times for inspection of the following: 24) 25) Plan Reviewer Signature Title c: A Pet ) AiT" )( Jt. RECEIVED PLANNING 61 v/ p,ZIN 1/4 �J . TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE <' \ P J EVENTION u <0 4755 S.W.Griffith Drive . P.O.Box 4755 . Beaverton,OR 97076. (503)526-2469 . FAX 526-2538 /-F&RESGJ To: v"[z1 r4-l4 Date: 3/%,/, 0 WC I] CC D MC BV (�TI TU 0 DU 0 SH 0 WI [] KC Jurisdiction File Numbe 2 ,2 0/ Project Name: 1' 7 / 5.4-9# c_ y) S Project Address: R�G Y �� liK 2 L TVF&R File Number: - (Whenever referring to this project please include the TVF&R File Number) Project approved Project not approved- Please address items checked below and re-submit plans for review and approval to the: 0 TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office 0 Planning Department having jurisdiction for routing to the TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office Project conditionally approved subject to correction of items checked below. This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1994 Editions of the Uniform Fire Code(UFC)and those sections of the Uniform Building Code(UBC)and Uniform Mechanical Code(UMC)specifically referencing the fire department,and other local ordinances,regulations and guidelines. 1) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUILDING AND TURNAROUNDS; Access roads shall be within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the buil ding. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as measured along the fire apparatus access road, is greater than 150 feet(UFC Sec.902.2.1) 2)FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PROTECTION; When buildings are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be modified as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec.902.2.1 Exception 1) 3)ADDITIONAL ACCESS ROADS: Where there are 20 or more dwellings, an approved second fire apparatus access roadway must be provided to a city/county roadway or access easement(UFC Sec.902.2.2) 4)FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not kss than 20 feet(15 feet for not more than two dwelling units),and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less dun i3 feet 6 inches.(UFC Sec.902.2.2.1) n- 5) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES; Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load(gross vehicle weight).(UFC Sec.902.2.2.2) Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading. Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code. 6) TURNING RADIUS; The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3) 7)DEAD END ROADS: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess oil 50 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district.(UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4) 8)BRIDGES: Bridges shall be designed, inspected and final construction approved by a registered engineer. The bridge shall be designed in accordance with the American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials "Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges.- The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry 50,000 pounds. (UFC Sec.902.2.2.5) 9) NO PARKING SIGNS; Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway an.' in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4) Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground level of 7 feet Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a white background.(UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(I)(2)&(3)) "Working"Smoke Detectors Save Lives _ . .r REQUEST FOR COMMENTS OF 4'. GARD Community(Development RECEIVED PLANNING Shaping Better Community DATE: March 10,1991 RECD MAR 1 MAR 14 1997 2 1997 TO: Tualatin Valley Water District CITY OFtIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts[x3111 Phone:15031639-4171 Fax:[5031684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW[SDR]91-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W&72ND A request to build a restaurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The General Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62S, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our st a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. f you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursd - March 20. 1997. ou may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If ou are unable to res and by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and nfirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 1 all Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: -X l, We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 1 (Tase provide the follouning information)Name of Perseids)Commenting: - ,/ fif • Phone Number(s): Dzt-5---- SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W/72ND PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS / 1 RECEIVED PLANNING MAR 14 1997 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS o IIGARD Community Deveropment CITY OF TIGARD Shaping A Better Community DATE: March 10,1991 / TO: Development Services Technicians Jill: ,' lean: ! Jim: n)* Bonn! ! Debbi FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts(x3111 Phone:(5031639-4171 Fax:(5031 684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W&72ND A request to build a restaurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The General Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62S, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 20. 1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: " I atr/, i'4 )1 I_ I e > 1d . , LL! ' - ! ' 1 4 (cPrease provide the follirwing information)Name of Person(s)Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W/72ND PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JIAi3te ,/ A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CI O TIiGARD RECEIVED PLANNING Community rDeveropment Shaping Better Community MAR 12 1997 DATE: March 10,199/ TO: Tigard Police Department Interim Crime Prevention Officer 1TYOFTIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts(x3111 Phone:[5031 639-4171 Fax:[5031604-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W&72ND A request to build a restaurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The General Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62S, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 20, 1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEAS)CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tlease provide the forThwing information)Name of Person(sl Commenting: I Phone Number(sl: x y•8 I SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W/72ND PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OF TIIGARD Community Development RECEIVED PLANNING SkapingA Better Community DATE: March 10,1991 MAR 12 1997 TO: John Roy,Property Manager CITY OFTIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Divis on STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts 1x3111 Phone:(503)639-4171 MC(503)684-7297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SORI 91-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W&72ND A request to build a restaurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The General Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62S, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 20, 1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V • (cPlease provide the fortawing information)Name of Personlsl Commenting: I Phone Numberlsl: I SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W/72ND PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS C.OFTIfGARD • 115KL Community'Development Shaping getter Community RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: March 10,1091 TO: David Scott,Building Official MAR 11 1997 rzetoF TIGARD FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONtact Mark Roberts[x3111 Phone:(5031639-4171 Fax:(5031684-1297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDRI 91-0001 y MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W&72ND A request to build a restaurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The General Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62S, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 20, 1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. MM Written/comments provided/below: 27 LI R 11 le /y 0.; A.�v 1 i ✓ ( 0;11 (2) fiRe ot,f iTt✓il C — V '► (lease provide the following information)Name of Person[sl Commenting: I Phone Number[sl: I SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W/72ND PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 4 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CIT TIIGARD Community DeveCopment Shaping Better Community DATE: March 10,1991 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts 0x3111 Phone:(503)639-4171 Fax:150316847297 RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ISDRI 91-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W&72ND A request to build a restaurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1 S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The General Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62S, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 20, 1997. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 44 4 (2Cease provide the foCrowing information)Name of Personfsl Commenting: I Phone Number(sl: I SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W/72ND PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS REQUEST FOR COMMENTS NOTIFICATION UST FOR LAND USE&DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS I CIT Area: (CI ID IV (WI CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS COI Place for review in library CIT Bookfsl FILE NAME:/ M2_400K1/a 5 ti, 9 t-)Ad FILE NMI: SBA) 97- do°( CITY OFFICES l� AgVANICED PLANNING/Nadine Smith,Planning Supervisor -C UNITY DVLPMNT.DEPT./o iPmnt Svcs T.cencan, _LPOLICE DEPT./cr,e Ptevention Officer l-UJILDING DIV./David Scott,Beading Motel [iE INEERING DEPT./Brian Rager,Delon,nt Review Engineer _WATER DEPT./Michael Miller,operanne:Mu agar _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,cayRecorder _ PERATIONS DEPT./John Roy,ProperlyMeneger _OTHER SPECIAL DISTRICTS ‘LATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE iz UALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT L UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY Fire Marshall Administrative Office Lee Walker,SWM Program Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street (place in pick-up box) Beaverton,OR 97075 Hillsboro,OR 97124 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON _CITY OF TUALATIN _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE _OR. DIV.OF STATE LANDS PO Box 4755 Planning Director 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street, NE Beaverton,OR 97076 PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem,OR 97310-1337 Tualatin,OR 97062 Portland,OR 97207 _Larry Conrad,Senior Planner _OR. PUB.UTILITIES COMM. Mike Matteucci,Neighomd coord METRO _OR. DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street. NE 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 _CITY OF DURHAM Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 City Manager US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. PO Box 23483 _Mary Weber,Growth management coordinator _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. 333 SW First Avenue Durham,OR 97281-3483 _Mel Huie,Greenspaces coordinator(CPA's/ZOA's) 1175 Court Street,NE PO Box 2946 Salem,OR 97310-0590 Portland,OR 97208-2946 _CITY OF KING CITY METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION City Manager 800 NE Oregon Street OREGON DEPT.OF TRANS.(ODOT) WASHINGTON COUNTY 15300 SW 116th Avenue Building#16,Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept.of Land Use&Trans. King City,OR 97224 Portland,OR 97232-2109 Attn: Tom Highland,Planning 155 N. First Avenue 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350, MS 13 _CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY Sal m,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 Planning Director Bonneville Power Administration PO Box 369 PO Box 3621 _ODOT,REGION 1 Brent Curtis(CPAS) Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Routing TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera Sonya Kazen,owpmt Rev coord _Scott King(CPA's) Portland,OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders _Mike Borreson(Engineer) _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland,OR 97209-4037 _Jim Tice iiGAsi David Knowles,Panning Bureau Do. _OREGON,DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY _Tom Harry(current PI Apps( Portland Building 106,Rm. 1002 811 SW Sixth Avenue ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A _Phil Healy(current PI Apps) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue Portland,OR 97204 Jane Estes,Pernit speciaiisi Portland,OR 97204 PO Box 25412 Portland,OR 97298-0412 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _BURLINGTON NORTHERN R/R _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO. V'TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Administrative Office Jason Hewitt Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Kim Knox, Project Planner 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 710 NE Holladay Street Vancouver,WA 98660-3000 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Portland,OR 97232 Portland,OR 97232 Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 COLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY _TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Craig Eyestone _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Linda Peterson Pete Nelson 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Scott Palmer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street Beaverton,OR 97005 220 SW Second Avenue Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97204 Portland,OR 97209-3991 _GENERAL TELEPHONE Paul Koft, Engineering _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY MC: OR030546 Brian Moore Tigard,OR 97281-3416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Road Beaverton,OR 97007 h\patty(masters(rfcnotice mst 7-Feb-97 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ��'' CITY OF TIOARD Communzty•Derelopment Shaptnj,d Better Community • STATE O'F ORGOX ) County of'Washington )ss. City of?Tigard ) I, Patricia L Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. • • That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED L) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (TMIM Ms Om IImemfM) Miter Mlle 1,1111Utel {ant ammorlate bey below} C City of Tigard Planning Director C Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council ki That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: Mott M view,r aelicrUy City of Tigard Planning Director • That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: toed M Om II smeaMe) {cluck immolate box below) City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard Planning Commission C Tigard City Council • That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICES] of which is attached, mar - • Exhibit "A", wa§mailed to eac amed person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit , o the •ay offr5,/,(i 199 f, and deposited in the United States Mail on the I on • • i --4. . 199 /, postage prepaid. _1/„.-01ANVIIA i Prepared Notic N Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the s day of , I� , 1 R1 1 lI le-::::''s,� OFFICIAL SEAL A"t 1 DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ,, o COMMISSION NO SEPTEMBER 07,1999 NOTARY • I BUC OF OREN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTE My Commission Expire 7/7/9 ✓`�7 FILE INFO. CLSt NemSk ,5bk. 41-000/ CUE"USE IriaidS (44,46/444,246- EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF DECISION 4110 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 97-0001 T" O T�II CITY OF IGARD MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT CommunityDececopment ShapingA Better Community SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT Site Development Review SDR 97-0001 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested Site Development Review approval to allow the construction of a 2,871 square foot restaurant with a drive through service aisle. APPLICANT: McDonald's Restaurant OWNER: Co-Trustees of the Stewart Trust 5000 SW Meadows Road (List available Upon Request) Lake Oswego, OR 97035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial; C-G. LOCATION: The southwest corner of SW Pacific Highway and SW 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (503) 639-4171.) 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a public improvement permit and compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall). 2. As a part of the public improvement plan submittal, the Engineering Department shall be provided with the name, address and telephone number of the individual or corporate entity who will be responsible for executing the compliance agreement and providing the financial assurance for the public improvements. 3. Prior to issuance of the building permit, additional right-of-way shall be dedicated to the Public along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue to increase the right-of-way to 40 feet from the centerline. The description shall be tied to the existing right-of-way centerline. The dedication document shall be on City forms. Instructions are available from the Engineering Department. 4. The applicant's plans shall provide for the construction of a half-street improvement along the frontage of SW 72nd Avenue. This improvement will need to provide for an extension of the two existing southbound travel lanes to a point where the proposed site access will be constructed. The westernmost lane should be converted into a right-turn only lane into the McDonald's site and the remaining southbound lane will continue past the site. Beyond the southern edge of the site access, the pavement width can taper down to 22 feet from centerline. The applicant will be permitted to sawcut the existing edge of asphalt and simply widen the pavement section as needed because the existing pavement was placed per City standards as a part of the City project. Other improvements adjacent to this site shall include: a. pavement tapers needed to tie the new improvement back into the existing edge of pavement shall be built beyond the site frontage; b. curb; c. storm drainage, including any off-site storm drainage necessary to convey subsurface runoff; d. six (6)-foot concrete sidewalk; e. street striping; f. streetlights as determined by the City Engineer; NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 2 g. underground utilities (NOTE: the applicant may be eligible to pay a fee in-lieu- of undergrounding existing overhead utilities); h. street signs; and driveway apron. 5. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant's site plan shall be revised as necessary to indicate how the site access will be shared with the adjacent parcels to the west and south. 6. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for the common driveway. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. 7. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the Tualatin Valley Water District for the proposed water line relocation prior to issuance of the City's public improvement permit. The public improvement drawings shall include the detailed design of the water line work. 8. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant's design engineer shall submit documentation, for review by the City (Brian Rager), of the downstream capacity of any existing storm facility impacted by the proposed development. The design engineer must perform an analysis of the drainage system downstream of the development to a point in the drainage system where the proposed development site constitutes 10 percent or less of the total tributary drainage volume, but in no event less than 1/4 mile. If, indeed, there is a deficiency in the downstream system, the City will allow the applicant to construct the proposed on-site detention facility. 9. The applicant shall provide an on-site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval prior to issuance of the building permit. In addition, a proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations for review and approval. 10. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994. 11. The applicant shall provide a geotechnical report, per Appendix Chapter 33 of the UBC, for the proposed grading slope construction. The recommendations of the report shall be incorporated into the final grading plan. A final construction supervision report shall be filed with the Building Division prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. (STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Official, 639-4171, ext. 311). NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 3 12. The applicant proposes to provide a Rhododendron planting along portions of SW Pacific Highway and SW 72nd Avenue to screen the parking lot from view of the adjoining right-of-ways. The applicant shall revise this planting to provide these shrubs or another form of screening along the entire length of the applicant's SW 72nd Avenue leasehold frontage. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 13. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of two additional parking lot trees that are dispersed within the parking lot. Parking has been provided within a total of three rows. Each row has 9-10 parking spaces. Because the rows of parking spaces are in excess of seven spaces each, an additional three finger planters will need to be accommodated. The applicant may also use other means so that one parking lot tree is provided for each seven parking spaces. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 14. The applicant shall obtain written approval from the franchise hauler for the location and design of the proposed trash and recycling enclosure. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 15. The plan indicates that 39,885 square feet is to be leased but did not indicate how many square feet exclusive of adjoining right-of-way is to be developed with landscaping. The applicant shall provide calculations that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the leasehold area is to be landscaped. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 16. No street trees have been proposed along SW Pacific Highway frontage, the plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the SW Pacific Highway frontage. One additional street tree shall also be provided along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage towards the SW Pacific Highway intersection. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 17. A security lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. 18. Because the leasehold area develops a portion of the site approximately 320 to 330 feet from the SW Pacific Highway and no other walkways through the block exist further south, the site plan shall be revised to provide a walkway through the site along the common driveway to the site from SW 72nd Avenue. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 19. The applicant shall complete the required public improvements and submit as-built drawings for review and approval. 20. The applicant shall either place the existing overhead utility lines along SW 72nd Avenue underground as a part of this project, or they shall pay the fee in-lieu-of NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 4 undergrounding. The fee shall be calculated by the frontage of the site that is parallel to the utility lines and will be $ 27.50 per lineal foot. If the fee option is chosen, it shall be paid prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. 21. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained as approved per the revised site plan. THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: An existing detached, single-family residence is to the west of the portion of the property that is proposed to be developed with a McDonald's Restaurant use. The City has no record of any previous development applications for this portion of the property. Recently, approximately 2.02 acres of the southwestern corner of the same property was sold to TRI-MET and developed for use as a Park and Ride Lot. The land use case for the Park and Ride Lot decision is SDR 95-0007. Vicinity Information: Properties to the north, south, east, and west are zoned General Commercial (C-G). Surrounding areas are predominantly developed with commercial uses. The adjacent property to the west is developed with a commercial automotive repair use. To the south is the Act III Theater, and to the east of SW 72nd Avenue is a retail sales use. To the north of SW Pacific Highway is the Fred Meyer Shopping Center. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant proposes to lease 39,885 square feet of the remaining 3.67 acre parcel to develop a McDonald's Restaurant with a drive through service aisle. The property has frontage on SW Pacific Highway and SW 72nd Avenue. The site generally slopes away from SW Pacific Highway towards the Act III Theater property. The site slopes in elevation from approximately 264 feet at SW Pacific Highway, to 210 feet at the southerly property line. A drainage area along the southerly property line contains wetlands. The area to be developed is approximately 225 feet to the north of the existing wetlands. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Impact Study: Section 18.32.050 states the applicant shall either specifically concur with a requirement for public right-of-way dedication, or provide evidence that NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 5 supports that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. Alternatively, an applicant may specifically concur with the requirement for dedication of right-of-way to the public and waive the impact study analysis by dedicating the right-of-way and completion of a waiver statement. The applicant specifically concurred with the requirement for dedication both within the applicant's narrative, and within the proposed public improvement plans. This rough proportionality analysis has provided for the applicants' convenience. Any required street improvements to certain collector or higher volume streets and the Washington County Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) are mitigation measures that are required at the time of development. Based on a transportation impact study prepared by Mr. David Larson for the A-Boy Expansion/Dolan II/Resolution 95-61, TIF's are expected to recapture 32% of the traffic impact of new development on the Collector and Arterial Street system. Presently, the TIF for a $2,871 square foot drive through restaurant is estimated to be $12,058.00. If a TIF fee were charged that covers 100% of the traffic impact the cost would be $36,174.00. The applicant has proposed to construct half ('/2) street improvements on their SW 72nd Avenue frontage. Southwest 72nd Avenue is designated as a Major Collector Street facility that accommodates traffic from adjoining local neighborhoods to access Major Collector and Arterial Streets. Because of the limited pavement width that needs to be added to SW 72nd Avenue, a construction cost of $100.00 per lineal foot has been estimated for required right-of-way dedication and improvements to SW 72nd Avenue. Assuming that approximately 320 feet will be improved, it is estimated that the developer will contribute a total of $32,000.00 ($100 x 320 feet of frontage). A TIF credit for this work is applicable because improvements to SW 72nd Avenue are listed as TIF eligible. Because the $32,000.00 transportation improvement cost is less than the $36,174.00 traffic impact of this project, the cost of all required street improvement requirements is less than the impact and, therefore, roughly proportional to the required Conditions of Approval within this staff report. Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct a restaurant with drive through service. This use is classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as an eating and Drinking Establishment. Community Development Code Section 18.62.030 lists Eating and Drinking Establishments as a permitted use within the General Commercial Zoning District. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no minimum lot size requirement in the General Commercial (C-G) Zoning District. An average lot width of 50 feet is required. Developments within the C-G Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. Although a portion of the property is proposed to be leased, the underlying property ownership is not reduced through this application. The existing average lot width of the leasehold area is approximately 170 feet. The plan indicates that 39,885 square feet is to be leased, but did not indicate how many square feet NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 6 exclusive of adjoining right-of-way is to be developed with landscaping. The applicant shall provide calculations that demonstrate that a minimum of 15% of the leasehold area is to be landscaped. Setbacks: Section 18.66.050 states that there are no setback requirements, except 30 feet shall be required where a commercial use within the district abuts a residential zoning district. The site does not abut a residential zoning district, therefore, no specific setbacks are applicable other than parking lot screening standards, and clear vision requirements that are addressed elsewhere in this report. Building Height: Section 18.66.050 states that a maximum building height of 45 feet is allowed within the C-G Zoning District. The narrative indicates that a maximum building height of 17 feet, 1 inch is proposed. The proposed height does not exceed the maximum limit of the underlying zoning district. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement is satisfied as the applicant has submitted a landscape plan indicating the number, type, and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The proposed plan shows the provision of five (5) street trees along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage. The applicant has proposed to use a "Scarlet Sentinel Maple Tree" spaced at 30 feet on center. Based on their size at maturity, these trees are considered large specimens and, with one (1) exception, comply with street tree spacing standards. One (1) additional street tree will need to be provided on SW 72nd Avenue towards the intersection of SW Pacific Highway. No street trees have been proposed along SW Pacific Highway frontage. The plan shall be revised to provide street trees along the SW Pacific Highway frontage. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one (1) tree for each seven (7) parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three (3) feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant proposes to provide a Rhododendron planting along portions of SW Pacific Highway and SW 72nd Avenue to screen the parking lot from view of the adjoining right-of-ways. The applicant shall revise this planting to provide these shrubs or another form of screening, along the entire length of the applicants SW 72nd Avenue leasehold frontage. The Landscape Plan provides three (3) parking lot trees that are dispersed within three finger planters. The Landscape Plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of two (2) additional parking lot trees that are dispersed within the parking lot. Parking has been provided within a total of three NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 7 (3) rows. Each row has 9-10 parking spaces. Because the rows of parking spaces are in excess of seven (7) spaces each, an additional three finger planter will need to be accommodated (or other means) so that one (1) parking lot tree is provided for each seven (7) parking spaces. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a commercial development abuts a residential structure, the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1. At least one (1) row of trees shall be planted. They shall be; not less than ten (10) feet high for deciduous trees and five (5) feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2. In addition, at least 10, five-gallon shrubs or; 20, one-gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3. The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover, or spread with bark mulch. The lease areas adjoin a vacant residence that is on the same property, but not within the proposed lease area. During discussions with the property owners at the pre-application conference, the owner states that the existing residence has been vacant for several years. Because a detached, single-family residence is a non-conforming use within the General Commercial Zoning District. Section 18.132.040 (B)(1)(d) states that this residence cannot now be re-occupied for use as a single-family residence. For this reason, no screening and buffering are applicable between the residence and the proposed restaurant site. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three (3) feet in height. Obstructions that may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three (3), and eight (8) feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight (8) feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The site and landscape improvements, as proposed, comply with this criteria as indicated on the plan submittal. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(C) requires a minimum of one (1) parking space per 50 square feet of dining room area plus one for every two employees for Restaurants. The floor plan provides approximately 900 square feet of dining room area. The applicant intends to have 15 employees per shift. Based on these numbers, a minimum of 26 parking spaces are required. A total of 27 spaces have been provided, in satisfaction of this requirement. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 8 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires two disabled parking spaces if 26 to 50 parking spaces are provided. This section is satisfied as the proposed site plan shows the provision of two (2) disabled person parking spaces. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one (1) bicycle parking rack space for every 15 required parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. A minimum of 26 parking spaces are required to serve this development. A bicycle parking rack was provided which addressed this requirement. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) accesses with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one (1) access drive with a width of 24 feet, thereby, satisfying this requirement. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street that provides the required ingress and egress. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking. This shall be provided either by a minimum of a six (6) inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three (3) foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The plan shows pedestrian walkway connections from building entrances with frontage on SW 72nd Avenue and SW Pacific Highway, in compliance with the required dimensional standards. Because access is to be provided from SW 72nd Avenue, this plan as proposed, is in excess of the minimum standards. Signs: Section 18.114.130(C) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C-G zone. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Community Development Department. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on-site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated Recyclable prior to pick-up and removal by haulers. The applicant must submit a written sign-off from the franchise hauler regarding the design of the facility location, and its compatibility with their servicing equipment. Site Development Review: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) (Site Development Review - Approval Standards) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.150 and NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 9 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/Mobile Home Regulations) or 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use • and Structures) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (100-year floodplain), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six (6) inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The portion of the property that is to be leased is currently undeveloped. An adjoining portion of the property is developed with a detached, single-family residence and a detached garage. The site also, currently has several trees; but none within the area that is to be leased. The plan proposes to remove trees that are presently within the ODOT SW Pacific Highway right-of-way. Community Development Code Section 18.150 applies to trees on private property, therefore, the removal of the tree is under the State's jurisdiction. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adjoining uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This proposal does not abut a use that requires a buffer, as required in the Buffer Matrix (18.100.130). This criteria will be satisfied as addressed in the buffer matrix section below. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The plans show the provision of landscaping that is intended to provide screening in accordance with this section. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. This requirement has not been addressed because the applicant's plan sets did not provide details on security lighting. A security lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a site development review application. The tree plan shall include identification of all NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 10 existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a plan that identifies all existing trees greater than six (6)-inches in caliper. The site plan indicates that the existing trees that are to be removed are within the ODOT right-of-way. The applicant states that no other trees are to be removed within the proposed leasehold area. The tree removal standards do not apply to trees within the right-of-way, therefore, no mitigation is required for the removal of these trees. Tigard Triangle Street and Pedestrian Accessway Standards: On December 30, 1996 the City Council adopted new zoning, street, and pedestrian accessway standards for the Tigard Triangle through Ordinance No. 96-42. These standards are applicable to this site because this application was submitted on February 12, 1997, and is within the area described as the Tigard Triangle. The new requirements state that a pedestrian accessway shall be provided through blocks at distances no greater than 330 feet. Because the leasehold area develops a portion of the site approximately 320 to 330 feet from SW Pacific Highway, and no other walkways through the block exist further south, the site plan shall be revised to provide a walkway through the site along the common driveway from SW 72nd Avenue. It is anticipated that future development will extend the walkway to the TRI-MET Park and Ride Lot in the future. Because future development will be required to design the walkway to the new Tigard Triangle Design Standards, the applicant should consider designing the walkway to meet these standards although these requirements do not apply to this application. A new right-of-way section for SW 72nd Avenue was also adopted February 25, 1997. Although not required, the applicant is also encouraged to redesign their SW 72nd Avenue frontage to conform with the new right-of-way section. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections' 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains), (Storm Water Quality), (Grading and Erosion Control) shall be satisfied as specified below: STREETS: This site is adjacent to SW 72nd Avenue, a Major Collector Street, and SW Pacific Highway an Arterial. Traffic Impact A traffic analysis was submitted by Kittelson & Associates, dated October, 1996, which addresses the potential traffic impacts from this development. This project is expected to generate approximately 1,845 daily trips, of which 145 trips will be during the typical weekday a.m. peak hour and 95 trips will be during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Of the 145 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 95 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, approximately 75 and 55 trips, respectively, represent net new trips on the transportation system. In other words, roughly 50% of the generate traffic will be new trips to the system. The other 50% will be existing pass-by traffic. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 11 The following intersections in the area were analyzed for impact from this development: 1. Tigard Cinemas Access Driveway/SW Pacific Highway; 2. Southwest 72nd Avenue/SW Pacific Highway; and 3. Southwest 68th Parkway-SW 69th Avenue/SW Pacific Highway. The traffic analysis indicates that after buildout of this project, all study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The traffic engineer indicates that the proposed access location on SW 72nd Avenue maintains adequate spacing from the signalized intersection at SW Pacific Highway. With the addition of the traffic from this project, the queuing on the northbound approach to the signal is not expected to significantly impact the operation of the driveway during either the a.m. or p.m. weekday peak hours. SW 72nd Avenue This major collector street was partially improved as a part of the City's improvement of the intersection at SW Pacific Highway. There are no curbs or sidewalk adjacent to this site and the pavement width is not built out to the ultimate requirement for a Major Collector street. The right-of-way (ROW) required for a Major Collector street is between 60 and 80 feet. Based on the high volume of traffic on this facility and the need for multiple turning lanes at intersections, the City has determined that 80 feet should be required. The applicant's plan indicates they will dedicate additional ROW to provide a total of 40 feet west of centerline, which will satisfy the ROW requirement. The roadway was partially improved adjacent to this site as a part of the City project at the intersection of SW Pacific Highway. As a part of that project, ODOT required the City to build two westbound left turn lanes on SW Pacific Highway at the intersection. Because of these dual left turn lanes, there is a need for two southbound travel lanes on SW 72nd Avenue. The applicant's traffic analysis did not address this issue. The City's project was only able to construct two southbound lanes for a distance of approximately 130 feet south of the SW Pacific Highway intersection. The existing pavement width from centerline varies from 33 feet from the SW Pacific Highway intersection to a point near the middle of the site frontage, to approximately 18 feet at the very southern edge of the site. Where the 33-foot section tapers down, the two southbound lanes must merge into one lane. With the additional trip generation from this site, there is a concern that this short distance will cause merging conflicts for traffic. To avoid these safety problems, Staff recommends the applicant extend the two southbound lanes further south. It would seem feasible to convert the westernmost southbound lane into a right-turn only into the McDonald's site and the other southbound lane could continue south past the site. Beyond the site driveway, the roadway could taper down to the standard major collector pavement section (22 feet from centerline). The City Engineer will need to review and approve a detailed design of this street improvement. If these improvements are constructed by the applicant, then Staff would support the application. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 12 SW Pacific Highway This facility is under ODOT jurisdiction and is improved with curb and sidewalk adjacent to • this site. ODOT has submitted comments to the City with regard to this application and has indicated that no additional ROW is required to be dedicated and no further improvements are required adjacent to this site. Site Access As stated above, the traffic study indicated that the spacing from the SW Pacific Highway intersection is adequate for the new driveway. Staff concurs with the traffic study findings and supports the driveway location. However, the application indicates that the driveway will be a shared access between this site and the adjacent parcels to the west and south. Based on the preliminary grading plan, it appears there will be a grade differential of 10 to 15 feet between the drive aisle and the properties south and west. The plan does not address how this driveway could be used by these adjacent sites. The City has an interest in limiting the number of driveways on a major collector and would recommend the applicant be required to share this driveway with the adjacent parcels. Therefore, the applicant should revise the site plan to show how access to the adjacent parcels will be provided. Prior to construction, the applicant should record a joint access and maintenance agreement for the driveway. WATER: There is an existing 12-inch public water line that crosses through an existing utility easement adjacent to the north property line of this site. The applicant has stated that they are coordinating with ODOT with respect to vacation of that easement so a portion of the 12-inch water line can be relocated to accommodate their site plan. ODOT's Region 1 office stated that they have not been contacted with respect to the utility easement. The easement area is within the old abandoned ROW segment for SW Villa Ridge, a former frontage road that was vacated several years ago by ODOT when the City modified the intersection at SW 72nd Avenue and SW Pacific Highway. Often, when ROW is vacated, a public utility easement is preserved to cover all public lines that may fall within that area. It appears that the applicant will need to coordinate with ODOT in order to vacate that easement. Regarding the proposed water line relocation. This water line lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District (TVWD) jurisdiction. The applicant will need to obtain any necessary permit/approval from the Water. District prior to issuance of City permits. A detailed design of the relocation shall also be included with the public improvement drawings that will be submitted to the City Engineering Department. The applicant shall provide evidence that a permit/approval has been obtained from the Water District prior to issuance of the Engineering permit. The applicant proposes to dedicate a new water line easement to cover all portions of the water line that will cross this site. The easement shall be approved by TVWD. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 13 SANITARY SEWER: There is an existing eight inch public sanitary sewer line in SW 72nd Avenue that is available to serve this site. The plan indicates a new service line will be extended into the site from this main line. STORM DRAINAGE: Storm water from this site is proposed to be directed to the southern end of the site where it would be detained, treated and released into the storm system in SW 72nd Avenue. Before the City can recommend detention, the applicant will need to provide a downstream analysis of the existing storm system to determine if there is a deficiency that would require detention. If no deficiency exists, the City would rather the applicant did not detain the storm water. The analysis will need to be reviewed by the Engineering Department. STORM WATER QUALITY: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit. As stated previously, the applicant proposes to construct an on-site pond facility to treat the storm water from this site. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL: USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity that accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits. EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES: There are existing overhead utility lines along SW 72nd Avenue. Section 18.164.120 of the TMC requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, at the election of the developer, a fee in-lieu-of undergrounding can be paid. If the fee in-lieu is proposed, it is equal to $27.50 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 14 SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Police Department, Maintenance Services Department, and Building Division have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this application and have offered the following comments: According to the traffic report, the subject intersection is expected to operate at near capacity (vlc=0.95). The proposed development will cause this situation to deteriorate further. The stacking on the south leg of the SW 72nd Avenue intersection needs to be reviewed because it is not adequate for right turners. Currently, two westbound left-turn lanes feed into the southbound exit lanes on the SW 72nd Avenue intersection, which taper into one lane within 150 feet. ODOT recommends that McDonald's be conditioned to construct half street improvements along their frontage on SW 72nd Avenue to provide for a future five- lane section. Doing so would extend the southbound exit lanes, making the dual left turn off of SW Pacific Highway more effective and would provide more storage space northbound. The need to expand SW Pacific Highway to a seven lane facility has been identified in numerous studies. This need was documented in the findings made by the City for their recent legislative rezoning of the surrounding Tigard Triangle Area. Therefore, ODOT recommends that the City condition the applicant to dedicate sufficient right-of-way, or at the minimum, provide adequate setback to accommodate this planned widening of SW Pacific Highway. The site plan appears to suggest that the McDonald's access is through adjacent property, and may also be used in the future by the adjacent property when developed. The applicant should provide plans for future access with the adjacent lot fully developed. It is desirable that McDonald's provide for future relocation of the access, further south, to reduce conflicts in the vicinity of the highway at such time as this adjacent lot develops. In Figure 2 of the traffic report, the lane geometry for the eastbound approach on SW 74th Avenue needs to be changed to a through and a through-right lane. The applicant contacted ODOT, District 2A regarding proposed tree removal on ODOT right-of-way. Jane Estes, Permit Specialist, sent an application for tree removal and minor grading on January 2, 1997 but has not been signed and returned, so as yet, no permit has been issued for the work. We do not foresee any obstacles to the permit issuance when they do return it. However, no work on ODOT right-of-way will be allowed until the application is returned and the permit processed. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 15 Page 6 of the application narrative states that the applicant will be placing directional signs in the visual clearance area. If this area is on ODOT right-of-way, the only private signs that will be allowed would be the Travel Information Council signs (on the blue background). The TIC can be reached (503) 378-4508 for application information. Page 7 of the narrative states that the applicant is working with ODOT to vacate the existing utility easement. This office has not been contacted about any utility easements and no application for relocating the 12-inch water main has been received. Utilities are not granted easements, but are given permits to be on right-of-way. ODOT recommends the following Conditions of Approval: 1. ODOT permit for all work in the SW Pacific Highway right-of-way, including tree removal, grading and utility relocation is required prior to commencement of construction. Application to be made to Jane Estes, Permit Specialist, ODOT District 2A. at 229-5002. 2. No signs permitted in the ODOT right-of-way, except for those approved by the Travel Information Council. 3. Applicant shall construct half street improvements along their frontage on SW 72nd Avenue. 4. Applicant to dedicate right-of-way on SW Pacific Highway to accommodate future widening for a seven (7) lane section. 5. Crossover easement to the property to the south is required to accommodate future potential relocation of the McDonald's access on SW 72nd Avenue. ODOT submitted a follow-up letter which revised their original comments as follows: We have further reviewed this proposal and it appears that ODOT owns adequate right-of-way for potential widening of SW Pacific Highway. However, the City should not calculate the proposed landscaping in the right-of-way to meet design standards as it is likely that the ROW will be utilized by the department in the future. Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue has reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: The minimum number of fire hydrants for a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less than one (1) fire hydrant for the first 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1). NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 16 The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000 gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3). The Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) reviewed this proposal and provided the following comments: SANITARY SEWER: Each lot within the development shall be provided with a means of disposal for sanitary sewer. The means of disposal should be in accordance with R&O 96-44 (Unified Sewage Agency's Construction Design Standards, July 1996 edition). Engineer should verify that public sanitary sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend service as required by R&O 96-44. STORM SEWER: Each lot within the development should have access to public storm sewer. Engineer should verify that public storm sewer is available to up-hill adjacent properties, or extend storm service as required by R&O 96-44. Hydraulic and hydrologic analysis of storm conveyance system is necessary. If downstream conveyance does not have capacity to convey the volume during a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, the applicant is responsible for mitigating the flow. WATER QUALITY: Developer should provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. SENSITIVE AREA: A "Sensitive Area" (exists) may exist. Developer must preserve a 25-foot corridor as described in R&O 96-44, separating the sensitive area from the impact of development. NOTE: Because Sensitive Areas are located along the southern portion of the property, no wetlands delineation has been recommended. The developer must provide a water quality facility to treat the new impervious surface being constructed as part of this development. Hydraulic and hydrological analysis of a storm conveyance should be provided. No other comments or objections have been received. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 17 SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON APRIL 23, 1997 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Sections 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.340 of the Community Development Code that provides that a written appeal must be filed. The deadline for filing an appeal is specified below. The appeal fee schedule and appeal form are available from the Community Development Department or Planning Division at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON APRIL 23, 1997. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or Community Development Department of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171. April 10, 1997 PRE ARED BY: Mark Robe DATE Associate Planner, AICP April 10, 1997 AP' 'OVED BY: °'c and Bewersdo '' DATE Planning Manager I\curpin\mark\sdr97-01.dec NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 97-0001 -MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PAGE 18 i . 0. r,.• _ 0 P� �"`e' G,]� +' ,nsfew+ �ss>. • ems,+ `, -` .. Peter. �`� y. ;.y.• :'/ boy'IR'�.i' 6 6l'1.• • PP' »r^•,/ / J' ,. i``1 •• `. ' ...•A• ,� .r ` I.6\____\,,-.. '\ 1• 4r � . T � ��••.,. ; _. . FKroTNG ive.e5\. . ti4S: �� ' \, c Illiililll,.i, ■ l.L.i ��I �� 151 ��� ��, ► CI - Vii• .a I .ALIAS f. - 4111111111k,`�' ��A Z _ANN... ., . ...• I IV IIIIII°° - . r(41 (I. ii 1* !,) a _I +1/z++��'µ,+o'ern �1 ;17.y,` '� II -,� 8 .,.. el7 Ail ,,,.1..r. jib& .. .. -P li.°.:1..:„.0::AWF .. 0 1 I• q � W I pe 0,0 I R // '• � ,,,,21.,„,,,.. • BrYYIh!„, .Wielit\ i ,I I I U1 Il-r I .„te ; . \:•:"...:. -- • •: .,, . ....... . _____... . •. -..,,,,:.,;. , NI* ' - in...,...........•wrw..rY:•a4. I • 0 • 1 ■ • • • PLOT PLAN i CASE NO. EXHIBIT M A P '9 McDonald's Restaurant SDR 97-0001 t. _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l l l► 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I r 1 1 I IM I PINE sT{ - Ell " 1 I 1 1.11Plimg I ' ' ' Ps'E— 1 ST - 1 ' ' d P.W imme %c31 ( C Z — — CO a a) 0 ,.0 0) ot . ogi I • _ c c __________ l i co VIP" t P ' : • ■*. ,, , — ,cso _ a_ L A4%1% , : . =, A c • M I- �I 4- :AYLOR ST 0 -c-------- I Q I }, f U CIJNTON ST • I 1 1 I ► 1ILI II Vicinity Mau R 7- SD 9 000 1 Note: Map is not to scale N McDonald's Restaurant on 99W&72nd SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W & 72ND (Page 1 of 1) 1S136DB-02601 ODOT - REGION 1, DISTRICT 2-A ALPROP CO Jane Estes, Permit Specialist 6149 SW SHATTUCK RD PCIRTLAND,OR 97221 PO Box 25412 Portland OR 97225 • 1S136DA-01102 ODOT - REGION 1 ANDERSON,MELDRE Sonya Kazen, Dvlpmnt. Review Coordinator GLADYS P 11570 ACIFIC HWY STE B 123 NW Flanders TLAND,OR 97223 Portland OR 97209-4037 1S136DA-01302 1S136DA-01200 ANDERSON,MELDREN W&GLADYS ANDERSON,MELDREN AND 11570 SW PACIFIC HWY STE B GLADYS P PORTLAND,OR 97223 11570 SW CIFIC HWY STE B PORTLAND,OR 97223 1S136DB-00201 1S136DB-00200 DUANE COMPANY FRANCESCHI,JEROME R/GENEVIEVE ATTN TAX DEPT FRANCESCHI,KENNETH A/BARBARA PO BOX 42121 600 THIRD ST PORTLAND,OR 97242 SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94107 1S136DB-00500 1S136DA-00902 GALVAN&GUITRON PARTNERSHIP OREGON EDUCATION ASSN 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY 6900 SW HAINES TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 1S136DB-00190 1S136DB-02602 OREGON,STATE OF STEWART,PHYLLIS AND DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION STEWART,DONATA AND FILE NO 6948 COHEN,NATHAN TRUSTEES 411 TRANSPORTATION BLDG 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR SALEM,OR 97310 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 1S136DB-02600 1S136DA-01101 STEWART,PHYLLIS TAND TIGARD,CITY' STEWART TRUST 13125 SW L 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR PO B 3397 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 T ARDOR 97223 1S136DC-00500 1S136DB-02603 TOM MOYER THEATRES TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN DBA TIGARD CINEMAS#113 TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF ORE 703 BROADWAY STE 605 4012 SE 17TH AVE VANCOUVER,WA 98660 PORTLAND,OR 97202 1S136DB-00501 UNION GOSPEL MINISTRIES OF PTL MCDONALD'S CORPORATION Go FRANCESCHI,JEROME&GENEV 5000 SW MEADOWS ROAD, SUITE 200 FRANCESCHI,KENNETH&BARBARA LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 37 SAN MATEO CT SAN RAFAEL,CA 94903 PHYLLIS STEWART, DONATA STEWART AND NATHAN COHEN, CO-TRUSTEES OF THE STEWART TRUST 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DRIVE LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 1 1 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE(503)684-0360 Notice TT 8789 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising R C E i V RE DD APR 15 1997 •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice ry;. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. CITY OF•71GARD Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit 'Accounts Payable • ti i SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW(SDR)97-0001 >MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT< w The Director has approved,subject to conditions,a request to build a res- taurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue;WCTM 1S136DB,Tax STATE OF OREGON, Lot 02600.ZONE:General Commercial(C-G).The General Commercial COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. zone allows public agency and administrative services,public support facilities,professional and administrative services,financial,insurance, I, Kathy Snyder real estate services,business support services,general retail sales,eating being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of the Ti va rd-Tualatin REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 Imes and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 193.020; published at Tigard in the 18.150 and 18.164. • aforesaid county and state; that the ;--f. . , , _,•• ,-,1,--• 1 "171" l I 1 _ i i I I 11 ' 1 SDR 97-0001 llcDonald ' s _ I� 1 •+ i 1 I I ; L ! a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the r, r-i 1 i '""i `-1 ---1---1,! I�. .• T 1 i ` entire issue of said newspaper for ONE .`--1 ,,___,__r' 7 r___.4' successive and ` 1 -? ;T l 1 �-+ - I I consecutive in the following issues: ,--� , � __.,�,..._ ,_.�L tV ' April 10 ,1997 , \ �' .� I KO-4\ ,0 ci C ______ II 1 1 _ , r_—.0,01r4' N 1 Subscribed and sworn to-br0 ore me thi, 1 . • . • L • . 1, 19 _ _ �_ �u' : I — I koe-ot (.:(. Au -I o'' 1 Nota ublic for Oregon �-- ! j ` i 1 My Commission Expires: J � AFFIDAVIT - I / \ �� . 57> 1\\.2(ii, , ) , ..- v „.. 1 1----► ! 1!--J--L- \ li f,------�� ! g- �---�; 1 ! 1 i , , I The adopted finding of facts,decision,and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223.The decision shall be final on April 23, 1997.Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A)and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent.The deadline for filing an ap- peal is 3:30 P.M.,April 23, 1997. TT8789-Publish April 10, 1997. ' t , ST 1 iiii,,,...........: ,,,.........:.; , , . 4-.• MI '1;...:..,:....,.:: , . 1 C 1511. 151 ..-=• .190 .., , . 1 , , , ,,,,, .., CD .. ,, ., , , . ,,,, , 8 . .....::,..z. 131"-a o'.!' W... 1 m €i i� } o s� 1 ar ai ti ' e V' 1 • 1$1 ' 100 15 - c ii x t,. 3it3B600 O._ ti i [ p . IL1(3... 136 1,%, it 1 A -lilt r ;,3 33¢ ■ U BAYLOR F1-7-'ST Vicinity Map ' SDR 97-0001 N Notification Map APPLICANT MATERIALS 9704.2 6gz- /4-74- , -nu'440 N co►+.tu ►2'!50 S HAtn a E4 rYt�,`rr�wu arm.. Ap'4 LL.i S STfu, t r • C s i Sit.)TNG,/-E-w ,cselec ore,4 0, 74.$'`296,g 1 N vlviV),at SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW .�,�.. '1;1 APPLICATION . •III . CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 GENERAL INFORMATION PRE-APP. HELD WITH: AnAAQIC I2CP f.2.T- DATE OF PRE-APP.: 7/9`9(0 Property Address/Location(s): SW Co¢u6� DP -72Nio AvOktuk. A^'r S w -FP4 c v t L( FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot#(s): T t_ 24000 , IZ2(0)51,02 ;�pp 1 S l 3(,DS o 2fo00 i 3.3q At¢FS Case No.(s):�vl� �7- Other Case No.(s): Site Size: 39) 8f35 .43 Qf r o2 D. 9150 it.ck.ee-, Receipt No.: p q-7- .2-1•0303.. Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': '� &t 1fl 1 Application Accepted By: K 4-- Date: 1-."Address: Phone: t#2'.‘4:1 City: Zip: Applicant*: Ake-Do nygLo's Cot io>� �" Date Det rmine�To Be Complete: Address: �`pc0 S Ai M,fc,AOcviS RD, Phone:�3- cow{—q3 -2_/7 5 ` City: bk-tp, nAue.ab t 02. Zip: q-7035 Comp Flan/Zoe Designation: 'When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written CIT Area: 1Ss/---- authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this Rev.8/29/96 i:'curpin\masters\.sdra.doc form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS The owners of record of the subject property request Site ✓ Application Elements Submitted: Development Review approval to allow (please be specific): D. Application Form e' yov_ue.co pe Ac QU IC.K.. c{.e.k.NT� 1- - /tt rr3+ ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization A ;vim --t't-F¢4k 4zvir . , ❑ Title Transfer Instrument or Deed b . -7 2-1,,4) Nu I,, ,f ,µ ms 12 Site/Plot Plan (8'/:"x 11") (#of copies based on pre-app check list) Wit/ R `' k ' & °`lam -77-- ❑ Applicant's Statement e j — . _ £6 A Ai j (#of copies based on pre-app check list) (�wF.vP2i �t-trk. /w vIZ-- Q i sT ^ ❑ Construction Cost Estimate p Filing Fee (Under 5100,000) $ 800.00 w I LL._ 122,F 1c /k-LO(�fc-,(D • (S100,000-9999,999)c.,. s 600.00 1 ($1 Million&Over) $1,780.00 (+$5/$10,000) 1 411P . List any VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE, SENSITIVE LANDS, OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: None [APPLICANTS: l To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as I described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPL;CANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this 4 l 4-1— day of -3{Zu.q.0u 1 , 19 q1 Owner's gignature Owner's Signature /V ATE Got-FE-N DoN Owner's -.ignature Owner's Signature T7F1�LLt� STEW T 2 111 MEMORANDUM FROM: Co-Trustees of the Stewart Trust Nate Cohen Phyllis Stewart Donata Stewart TO: City of Tigard RE: Property Owners Authorization Statement ************************************************************************ The above named Co-Trustees of the Stewart Trust,owners of the property at the SW corner of 72nd Avenue and SW Pacific Hwy in Tigard, Oregon,also known as TL2600, give McDonald's Corporation,at 5000 SW Meadows Rd.,Ste. 200, Lake Oswego, Oregon, authoriztion to apply for a Site Development Review, in the City of Tigard. Of Nate Cohen Phyll'l Stewart 17750 Shawnee Trail 621 SW Englewood Dr. Tualatin, OR. 97062 Lake Oswego, OR. Donata Stewart 777 SW Englewood Dr. Lake Oswego, OR. R7 8dev\const\taylor\TIGARDS UB.doc(02/11/97) Axmasa CITY OF TIGARD Community Development S(iapingA(Better Community PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 97-0001 FILE TITLE: MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W & 72ND AVENUE APPLICANT: McDonald's Corporation OWNER: Co-Trustees at the Stewart Trust 5000 SW Meadows Road, Suite 200 (List Available upon request) Lake Oswego, OR 97035 (503) 684-9334 REQUEST: A request to build a restaurant with sit down seating and a drive through service. LOCATION: Southwest of Pacific Highway and 72nd Avenue; WCTM 1S136DB, Tax Lot 02600. ZONE: General Commercial (C-G). The General Commercial zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62S, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY DATE COMMENTS DUE: Thursday March 20,1997 X STAFF DECISION DATE DECISION DUE: Thursday ApriI10,1997 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division (503) 639-4171 x317 SDR 97-0001 MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ON 99W/72ND PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • - BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 9310 9019 �' -'-`-- - •-" _.:'; PHYLLIS STEWAFtT,Grantor,for the corrsidhereinafter n hereinafter stated does hereby grant - ' 4101 �o bargain, sell and convey unto PHYLLIS STEWART,DONATA STEWART AND NATHAN : .J•:•'.,,,, • ors- COFT.N,CO-TRUSTEES OF THE STEWART TRUST ESTABLISHED UNDER THE LAST - - : t F WILL AND TESTAMENT OF SAMUEL.B.STEWART DATED OCTOBER 7, 1984,Grantee, 4'' o the following described real property,situated in the County of Washington,State of Oregon: '``,i, An undivided three-eighths(3!8)int-esc as tenant in common,in the followings - - ,- grit described real property: . - , ;y A parcel of land beginning at the northeast comer of the George Richardson ;I:• ! _ :,;,.%�a Donation Land Cairn No. 55,situated in Section 36,Township 1 South,Range -- r ^?j4 t. t c. '- '^f?a • �,-- 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; and running r _ hence South 00° 13'West 794.46 fat to a point in the center line of Southwest . -. :' a 72nd Avenue(County Road 245); thence North 89°47' West 20.00 feet to the _ �", `' III111��� :' . northeast comer of the Henry Metzentine property as described in Deed Book 418, - `� '`" zi -;,!.- Page 400, Washington County Deed Records, and which corner is on the -u :"Z� •-;` southeasterly right of way line of Southwest Pacific Highway;thence continuing . . Southwesterly on said right of way line on a curve to the right. having a radius S-_ = N _ of 1462.40 feet,(the long chord of which bears South 59°26'W:.si 244.32 feet) r ` :'~ i r'_'_': 244.59 feet to a 3/4 inch iron rod; thence continuing along said right of way, r, ;'$''k•: South 64° 13' West 229.34 feet to a 5/3 inch iron rod at the true place of y-�•s:, i ;...i_..,, beginning of the tract herein described;thence South 8° 10'East 74.31 feet to an I'' '' - J •' -`•_, iron pipe;thence South 0°30'West 71 feet to an iron rod;thence South 64° 13' R r , ti �,ta �..i � West 112.43 feet to an iron rod;thence South 0°30'West 75 feet to an iron pipe; :y:`.=34f`. -*` :-s •_ 'r .I thence North 82°44' 10"East 280 feet to an iron pipe:thence North 11°28'40" `' '' ?� t ,.--.{�s�: West 300 feet to an iron pipe; thence South 64° 13' West 140 feet to the true � '�-• '.t.'° .• ;�. -= point of beginning. 52- Z% ,'S - : .3 t yt. Grantor makes this transfer in connection with a duly approved lot line adjustment by �' ,'� ;.: which h.:boundaries of the real property described above(showin as Tax Lot 2602 on the mapsa%�`r' I r of the Washington on Court Assessor) and of the real property shown.on the maps of the $. ::�. _ {�_.�tip: gt t7 = ,,•• I: . ' Washington Court Assessor as Tax Lot 2600 are being adjusted (The adjusted boundaries of *.t"•:;-.7'• • .1",..--5 k•._ ':': the subject lots are as described on Survey No. 25,164,Washington County Survey Records.) +- ;`_ ti f' 'c,'.:. It is the Grantor's intent by this transfer to have all of the real property within the adjusted •.- r: i-r =• `c= . :xt �%- Ft -' 01_Y boundaries of the subject lots held as follows:an undivided five-eighths (5/8)interest held by .:-.:.,-t..._ r,' ?%4.,4': Grantor and an undivided three eighths(3/3)interest held by Grantee. .c it% �•t;• The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer,stated in terms of dollars,is S0. i '? • '' '• • However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or "•' - r'!'t-' ` :'1 promised which is the whole consideration. -,:..' '- s .. ~ ,; .; ."- In construing this deed and where the context so requires,the singular includes the plural >+'' —, 4': 0,. e. :r,,-.Y• and all grammatical changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to v7.i-T "•h.-`: ~ ' y' K corporations to individuals. P P trs'E, �' �e.� �• , _ }- - IN WIT\TESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument this day of '•. i'r -7:75.::::,..: '`4-r r jr- December. 1993. rM w t '-' ' ".° 's�Z . ,� -. -A` THIS INSTRUdtENT WELL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN . ' _1' ''''t < . v K' •• -• - .t,..`,s;t�' AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: ,mac . ' 1-.�tw4. Xl: -;�•, ,.?F I. Kenneth Davis r'�}f' ;. ".....-1-';'•: '7'- . -'a, '.' 3 851 SW Sixth Avenue,Suite 1500 r ;" 1,r. sr, k : f3 Portland Oregon 97204 •� J- a- 4�Yy ' '. UNTIL A CHANCE IS REQUEJ t LU,ALL TAX STATE- ';x; , , '". S f KE.NTS SHALL DE SENT TO THE FOLLOI%'lNG ADDRESS: _ . - "c;''-•-•. --- Phyllis T.Stewart " ,ice; 1,, -:•.;`• - ` r- r. 621 S.W. Englewood Drive t`y y�`, "(' ;tt-; Lake Oswego.Oregon 97034 ' ;.�•.: M1 i3 I BARGAIN,ND SALE DEED �t�ovrc:-:.o: i . ....-3,.....,,.:.:,5... '`. 4 N:t ' ‘•:-.....i--W -.t.. .. z �±e• �. __ .?�: - _ - ✓ ;y +, t r- r te t y :� . :.. } -J r � ^: . y, _ - I s'41.:7,4-r,`: S qs 1 L. ..}e41c a'v r tAs,.t y p 3 THISRE.GuLALNSTRTioUNEENTtis. BmINREVIOsiLAGNLsTIOGN OORF AAPPLICcErrisRCTABIGLSHETHIsOLANDULDINCHKsTRI.SEcux,6mr.LKWFrrrnS,ANDTEETHE APPROPRIATE CrrY ANY ON EutiTyTO Till:FLPANNINROPELImns FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS D.E,,FDIED. Th:ORS 3.0-910. Phyllis,Stewart STATE OF OREGON ) .;-:.',-.,.-?:.:5'../.'-•:-•---• 44:..:.- `-:•-•7 clA SEAL CX-r-r`i•--—hl c_LC-lisete--- `,Z...':',• My Commission Expires: - .,..i .W.-_-..--..:.,--.'-- '.,:.i-=';-.,,,:'-::::-:: • 1g4:-...-'1."'-.• •••:.,..-Ft -•:,<F: ilr '''',3_ /T.8n' and lexation and EA-Chic/0 County Jerry R. Ha/loons Director of „•,, .t. • t' l ag ..w' .r3•:-'. ,w^: .'-,. *4- 4''''''''..4 4... _ 1 - .- ''h3�ilwb>ti..•sat ......-.....L...-...-.-.. . .P •� - - - I /• a .............................•''.' -. . ■ R sox*w..101-0110-NrfOMY t0110410.000 nrMMd r c•w•••.t. i '1 /g:� S \G if 86051674 ,. csi-,_ _ . tit. r[a�• 1y ►EItfONAt t1PtlS[MATM'S DEED e„r ' 4}e .K. T:: T, - 1; tt October /986.... ,by and f ".� •.^. � r •.: li IRIS INDENTURE Mad• thn........ Y. ... day d ..`.... ... ..................... ? it between PHYLLIS T. STEWART ... - "" • rt - W C` jriS-.. the duly appointed,qualilied and actin.(personal representative of the estate of .. . . .. .... .of ,� ..-.r .. Samuel B. Stewart ,deceased, hereinafter called the lint party,and 1 , < '� ,.w Y♦ - the STEWART TRUST, Phyllis Stewart, Donata Stewart, and.Nathan Cohen,Trustee/3, -T..r:p ;1 v1; II hereinalter called the second party; WITNESSETH: : r?Q" -::.:.'."O. - _ '� For value received and the consideration hereinafter stared,the receipt M•hereol hereby i.acknowledged,the ^. wl.. -};..;A I. N- . lira(party has granted,bargained,sold and conveyed.and by these presents does grant, • bargain,sell and convey unto I� ^.,.� _ t �1 -';<.�:."'� ••�?': I the said second party and second party's heirs,successors-in•inrrrest and assign..all the estate,right end interest of �! :•. .�� 1 ;i¢ I the said deceased at the time of decedent's death•and all the right,title and interest that the said estate al said de- II `¢?-- •, /,, s {,; ' ceased by operation ol the law or otherwise may have thereafter acquired in that certain real properly situate in the I ''..-5:.i.T^; O 411111_ 'i^l I County of Washington ,State ol Oregon,described as hollows,to-wit: ,• '':•', . 7�' Undivided 37.54 (3/8ths) interest as Tenant in Common: I + .�;''�:. : 7,,;,. s !I 5.14 acres bordering and extending easterly of _rc• u� II Pacific Highway and southerly of S.W. 72nd Avenue, ;' K::-,r•,-' �:' O jr I� Washington Count}', Oregon. 1 South 1 ,•lest 36 D.B. :.''C, -.,•.:-• Tax Lot 2600 and more particularly described in 1 .->:. -**. t r w t. I Appendix A attached hereto. 1 ? .1-•;i, . -- Q � . II : «r' I.:'*' �1< •vn,' 1� THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USt '• LAWS AND REGULATIONS.BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY M -a-1. - `t:. I SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO vrRIFY APPROVED USES. ''1 i• II ••'t ',�,} • >•.�:; II pr VAC[IMSUInCNN?.CON OM./(OtSCbrTION ON 1(VI 51 51011 ■1 K ,f-"- '• ''t '•' ,-' 0 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said second party,and second party's heirs,successors-in-interest I, �4 .` '2'1 ' .__ f• and assigns forever. testamentary .'f''1*' II The true and actual consideration paid for this trennler,stated in terms o/dollars,is$bequest • 1I •-.0,? 1 I' cDrfowever,the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is F"'"°1"" the whole +•• I consideration(indicate which)m t I' IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said first party has executed this instrument;if first party is a corporation, I � I it has caused its corporate name to be signed hereto and its corporate seal affixed by its officers duly authorized j •- '- Tf neon by order its o Directors. J_/1 , 1 t ! �•�s ', !hereunto rde of't Board l D'ecto `/ r. 3'1:;1777:V.: 7c - - :: - Phyllis T. Stewart `f I --t+- ,,,,:', ,, ...•.•..•. Personal Representative , }; �y� T+ �`' Samuel a. Stewart Deceased.of the Estate of r •.=.j NOTI■1 .....,.a ban.*,1..., I.I.0.II......11,N1•...•..N b.•.1.M.S..Ott 91.630. v �: ;I STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON.County of )... ! s t ,- ;1 County o1 1 )�` .--_-Personally_..� ... 19 .. • n.y' I' October -.?!. 1986 -b•b.:f duty .-Bra >f I' P•rw,..11•appeared the above ren..d-....__-.... -_.-..._.._.......- ._....____............ • • ••r1.for himself and net ens for the other,did•.y that the former is the l;yh ?HYLLI -Tp..STEWART.._.---...-...__�— G I .l ........president end that the !Fence i• the •_s. (1 .1..... .: secretary of ..... •• and �Tddd the!w•fo:af ................. _ mutt b.Die JR&.L iduntary se and deal. • oorp�or•ti n. I' '>S' • - 1 ■ end Hut the peal•Iliad to the lorefeinQ instrument is the corporate al .I •..;.-1} I .,• el arid corporation aid Out.aid instrument w••.ifnd end pealed in be- I •i r�,r a hall of said eorporatron by authority oI it.beard o!Jir•erer.:and•xii el . • are ! L`�L�! •. ,hem *aid instrument to be its velunrary .et and deed. �s a`/=�S ' `p••' •� -T .- Before ..: ' � r ya:- II (O SEAL)?, r1 t'j 'I SEAL)i :.. '•r�:•_!::`....:.. ...._........._-....... (OFFICIAL ,. c ,+� II 4ry`PatblCe`/a Ore Notary A,bric ter Or•pn SEAL) ^-T!a -f 1 �.} Mi 6eaun;aion•ap:r.a:n/.: it•J r MY convnJr:on•ruin«: III......a ay a n.n•••,:«, t - .• Phyllis T. Stewar•., Personal Rep• STATE OF OREGON, I, . .,•.• 621 S. W. Englewood Drive }ss. ,. Lake_.,Oswego,, Oregon 97034 County of i ''` •tit e• +.e•.+•..,+s,oe t+. I certify that the within inatru- " z +�'; •• STEWART TRUST men, vent received for record on the ii - 1 yt ...♦ - :.:_: .: ..... .dny ol.,.. .. .........19 n y-a at.... . o'clock .M.,and re:orded li � ' ' '^' ` """•` ' '-` a in book/reel/volume No on II Nathan L.. Cohen pn4r or es Ire/file/instru- II mrnr/m,crn(i!m/rrrip!on No.. 'I • �1 Attorney at Law I • v- ' • 3..j Record of Deeds ol cold county. II '•).�_ 851 S. W. 6th, Suite 1500 I Y; • Ptland, Orego 97204 WGnes< roy hand aril seal a1 II i�tYCI'•,. or .n ,..o .. _ County n(lirrd. II ''s. , I . - 1: I! u...n.s .. ..t.11 I..........«...n......,.,..au.. ..0«... .t i vl�, - II I y1� ). i ... •.e /-Z By ... .. Deputy ''t:1"'l ;, .}. e...,.o. _—_. T" ws - .:.:• n. .. .�,..err-_.. .. r t ^�+ I; t -_ . )'• i�eAel - ..*9,A,�'i yam .. '•: -- -' - t f1.. I.; -`ti`'e .. ".'ate+r ,. .. f A '}.;,-�,_: I ty',:µl:a� - rtl I + f 'r-::. .S. N . . ; -r I .<-�.f-� I' iI is ` " + r� `� • - ,► y ,. Q.1,::. +t II ';;F Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Geo. Richardson ' _ r :3 0' Donation Land Claim No. 55 situated in Section 36, `.' 1 _`.• Township 1 South, Rang• 1 West, Willamette Meridian, ...' .a f• It .; . :cis Waohington County, Oregon, and running thence South' Il �. 00°13' West 794.46 feet to a point in the center of s'•• -+-c.- ::::'!-?•• ^" S- • W, 72nd Avenue (County Road No. 245) thence North - % : ' i.' 89°47' West 20.00 feet to the Northeast corner of _ 7.•+ !:: that tract described in deed to Henry Metzentine, et ux '{ EA 4 . recorded April 12, 1948, in Book 284, Page 379, Washington I • County deed records, said point being on the Southeasterly . • right-of-way line of S.W. Pacific Highway and being the 'ti III true point of beginning of the herein described property; thence continuing Southwesterly on said right-of-way line .s on a curve to the right, having r radius of 1462.40 feet �. (the long chord of which bears South 59°26' West 244.32 r. ' feet) 244.59 feet to an iron pipe; thence continuing .! along said right-of-way South 64°13' West 89.34 feet to I! an iron pipe; thence South 11°28'40' East 300.0 feet to ( _-. an iron pipe; thence South 82°44'10" West 280.0 feet to j ,''ma` t{1{ an iron pipe on the East line of tract described as r1T!�' I Parcel IV in Memorandum of assignment recorded October 12, -j sr- 1 1966 in Book 618, Page 161, Records of Washington County; i thence South 0030' West along said East line 311.30 feet ' _ to the most Northerly corner of tract described as Parcel I , pk.,•+ '`=�_� in said Memorandum of assignment; thence South 36 050' - , (� ' I •r •=�' East 53.45 feet to the most Easterly corner of said (;X II Parcel I, being a point on the Northwesterly line of tract '' - described as Parcel II in said Memorandum of Assignment: f.fl=iF• thence North 44016' East along said Northwesterly line "%' 59.32 feet to an angle point thereon; thence North 61°31' f:fir '.... East, along said Northwesterly line 498.59 feet to a point 's' .i• � ••-;'.^ .., on the West line of S. W. 72nd Avenue; thence North 0 013' •-�i - East along said West line 566.53 feet to the true point .. :`:' •,. of beginning- '• ,I .`Y. STATE OF OREGON ± \°P'::01< ,\ n } SS•is �"< County of WMtngto ,, iI ....:. _ I.Donald W.Mason,D,rec:o•of Assessment y a. . and Ta,aeon end E.•On.c,o Recorder of Con- `.% '.e ` .eyances foe sae county.do nereoy comfy mat rf - •,��� - .4?• me wanm ,nstmmont of wrrtmg was recewed �i t •ct - 6 ...Sr..;hy .j.. and reco•ded.n boot or•ecpOS of said county. a_ • -` 3.,�i'.. :.•- Oona'd VI Mason. O,ector of •t 0 i;`.. - • . -L..•: 2/ Assessment end Ta.anon" E.- .. T,+ .�i.:i.ja r. ;..•••••. l Orr.ca County e ' . • t•�i '�•:-../• ti.p�••' to• `{" 1986 HOY-5 rw 2:07 f: ,• n `. w ‘r.4...44:/..i.;,,,;7.: s 4AgA }c" :, :4•a i°`• :' ja:3f= +'aid: i •; i_r • .- µ' ..yid. . ._. .. .. _ S �te'rtie#, g •t. l.rr s. f i r . -u ry4:1.1: r'r .'CS"^• ,.:rT•`s:T-s'� : .... ✓ L 6�t}" a`, .r. 1 yY R•'1 . ~'s • r "r to tY` + r;:i7;.....-,:it• F ; •t\ `r'-: !:s w w t rZ y •• �. ,y e 4 . s s;� S. .. - s. K r !S �• '- - a [ L '-',74,01-4."7t-F4''':.�,.1.•• y-•SI r- ` ^� t, .y{e- . y'T%t�$^ t --. ..: I • it - ar`�J r 7♦ . J''AV P: -,+ �,∎ M1^ _,e .4..r1v^.;:sri ti;a t .r� `e71iNk tti 'd , ' ,,ly�'i e•'- �; 7. Z- f,� `.f. d. •• �* 1.*t-•���,.i.: ,"'a y - e-7-°"*�. " �e:• f .c. ' ,, ."'-.rt - e•y e •' t: �Ty�,:ge"'Y:✓" 'x=f {tiRv:t• L ir+��i'''+-M�.�.;y t • r. �1 x •.s a.1r-{e J- ... i=.•". •"".Pa,ti'eta V-- -ti .�'' -'vs t -.Ss.0i►`.ti.-. Cost Estimate McDonald's Restaurant 72nd & SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR. Series 2000 McDonald's Building $240,000 Site Development Costs 39,885 sq. Ft. @ 5.00 $199,425 Offsite Development Costs $ 35,000 Total $474,425 R78dev\const\taylor\T IGARDSUB.doc(02/11/97) •V V1.1114N7t11i %%%%e76Nr SO°60'W X37,33 713.14 7— ----- $ _ _ { .•- 144.61 N IBO.09 sB aerrl U a a 1 0 Y 5 ` 8 A 01 YY 0`r _ 602.12 I.. 74.0 ` o NO°30E •96.8 187.27 N00•3dc t, �N8•99W 208.331 \ �y = A a •0 O 4 6T ,„.. 14'R/ii _ 0 S00 630W `8���(N�1 ` z 175.0 343.54 t' 0 0 ar r m 153.20 5•fit .3.0 i .4'rl't Bd o4 1 Nis 40.1 287.9 N079/6w NI°97'30"W 100 R.0°Gy 8,1e► J'761, O0 ��p l 0, s� 1 TAX LOTTED ON MAP t. @`� ISI36DC L 'vs -- N O°30'E_ 4, T —' - 6I .3fl 7S 1SO ` y • e P. , aA Lt gN `'fie 1>rs ? s d �• S00•12'W s �m N 0 �a �i di 180.0( si,.� g 1'• ^W 71.0 . N, Iow I r y • •r.l0 !iss, .OE 1 yJ'� W co viN \ ♦ • � OD j a� '�I0 s�V ON1 6\ {.- 00. - 00A, e 1 a 0 1 0.010 - \ B t � m g� . 1 71.77 J i O 1 6+ \ W n 248.76 N tt° 4'+ D• \ N7 00 1111119111 \ \ • \ ci N m ' J. O ofe °4; \et '9\ 0 \ • O \ \ \ EAST LINE B.RICNANDSON DLC , y6 31.02 3640 SO°13'W '. 98.61" A S W C.R.245 0 72ND AVE °" '/ I 1 I - •n (n m • w m m 3 o a a 71 • /Varra� v€ McDonald's Corporation 5000 S.W. Meadows Road Suite 200 MCDOtlald'S Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 503/684-9334 Fax:503/624-4105 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANTS STATEMENT DATE: February 11, 1997 TO: City of Tigard, Oregon FROM: Loy Taylor, Project Construction Manager, McDonald's Corp. SUBJECT: Site Development Narrative for: McDonald's Restaurant LOCATION: SW corner of 72nd @ Hwy 99W Tigard, Oregon The following is information which addressees the pertinent criteria, for a Site Development Application, for a quick service restaurant, with a drive-thru service. This criteria was found in the City of Tigard Municipal Code: Landscaping and Screening-Chapter 18.100 Enhancements- Substantial landscaping will be provided for this development due to the wide State ROW @ SW Pacific Hwy. The entire perimeter of the development will be buffered with landscaping, including plantings, ground cover,and trees. This perimeter landscaping, along with substantial interior landscaping,significantly defines this development, and adds to the aesthetic quality existing in the immediate area. Buffering and screening- The street trees, along with other plantings, along the North property boundary, (SW Pacific Hwy) and the East property boundary (72nd Avenue), will provide adequate screening of automobile headlight glare onto public streets. Additionally, we are providing a buffer in the form of hedge planting, which will screen automobile headlight glare onto public streets, as well as the property to the West. The property to the South is presently vacant, and will probably be developed into a commercial use. R7 8dev\const\taylor\TIGARDSUB.doc(02/11/97) Page 2 McDonald's Narrative Irrigation System- The irrigation system will be by design, and shall meet all approval standards of the City of Tigard, including location of the underground system and sprinkler head locations. Location, type, size, and planting species- The submitted Landscape plans provide adequate information regarding the location, type, size, and species of the proposed landscape plantings. Soils conditions- The existing site is vacant, however,some gravel and asphalt paving remain from prior development. The remaining portion of the property consists of sod. The property slopes to the Southwest, however,the grading down of the site along SW Pacific Hwy will lessen the severity of the slope. Erosion control- Erosion control measures are in the form of a siltation control fence, which will be constructed prior to commencement of construction,on the South and West boundary's of the proposed development. Additionally,a temporary gravel construction entrance will be provided @ 72nd Avenue. All slopes will be graded according to development ordinance standards, and will be stabilized with grass hydroseeding. Maintenance of landscape areas- All areas of landscaping, including landscaping within public right of ways, will be maintained by the applicant, or the applicants agent, on an ongoing bases, and according to Municipal Code 18.100.020. Existing landscaping- There is no existing landscaping, except for two trees which are in the State ROW. We have been given permission by the State of Oregon Department of Transpiration to remove these trees due to the extent of grading which will occur in this ROW. Street trees- R7 8dev onst\tay lor\TIGARDSUB.doc(02/11/97) Page 3 McDonald's Narrative Street trees located in the front and exterior side yards shall be a medium sized tree planted 35' apart. Visual Clearance Areas-Chapter 18.102 Our development will provide visual clearance at the drive access onto 72nd Avenue consisting of the required triangular area 30' along the 72nd ROW and 30' along the private drive access. We will also provide a visual clearance area at the intersection of 72nd Avenue and SW Pacific Hwy, consisting of a triangular area 35' along each ROW, but in relation to the Southwest corner only. The plantings and other developed appurtenances shall not exceed a height of 36", or be lower than 8', above top of curb. Off-Street Parking and loading requirements- Chapter 18.106 Off street parking has been provided pursuant to Municipal Code Section 18.106, consisting of standard size parking units dimensioned at 9' wide by 18' in length. The required minimum Offstreet parking for our proposed use is one space per each 50 square feet of dining area +one space per every two employees. Our proposed dining area consists of 900 square feet of space and our crew size will be approximately 15 per shift. According to this criteria the minimum Offstreet parking requirements would be 26 units. Our proposed development provides 27 standard parking units,along with two required handicapped parking units, which have been developed near the main entrance of the building. Bicycle parking- One bicycle parking space per 15 Offstreet parking units are required per the City of Tigard Code. Our development will provide four bicycle parking spaces, which are developed within the 50' maximum distance from the main entrance of the building. Unloading areas- An unloading area consisting of an 18' by 18' area directly forward of the delivery door entrance, at the North side of the building. Access, Egress, and Circulation-Chapter 18.108 R78dev\const\taylor\TIGARDSUB.doc(02/11/97) Page 4 McDonald's Narrative Our development provides for an access drive from 72nd Avenue. The curb cut is 46' in width, and approximately 170 feet from the SW Pacific Hwy ROW. This proposed drive is designed to access the Offstreet parking area in a safe and convenient manner. The drive access provides a 200'+storage area, which will preclude backup onto 72nd Avenue. Onsite traffic circulation was considered with the development of adequate drive aisles, and a drive-thru service lane with approximately 200 lineal feet of automobile queuing. Joint Access- Our proposed drive access from 72nd Avenue will be shared jointly with the vacant property to the South and West. Required walkway locations- Existing curb and public sidewalks are along the SW Pacific Hwy ROW. Our development proposes to construct curb and sidewalk along the 72nd Avenue ROW to the end of our development, to the South. Additionally, we propose to develop a walkway, for pedestrian traffic, from the public sidewalk @ 72nd to the main entrance of our building. This pedestrian walkway will comply with all requirements per the City of Tigard Municipal Code, (chptr. 18.108.050), and with ADA standards. Site Development Review-Chapter 18.120 Approval Standards- Chapter 18.84, Sensitive Lands Not Applicable Chapter 18.94, Manufactured Mobile Home Not Applicable Chapter 18.92, Density Computation Not Applicable R78dev\const\taylor\TIGARDSUB.doc(02/11/97) Page 5 McDonald's Narrative Chapter 18.144, Accessory Use and Structures Not Applicable Chapter 18.96, Additional Yard Area Requirement Our proposed property boundary setback from the centerline of SW Pacific Hwy, on the average, is approximately 70'. The required minimum is 50'. The setback from the centerline of 72nd Avenue to the property boundary varies, however, it maintains a minimum of 40'. This setback was established by our Civil Engineers through discussions with the City of Tigard regarding street improvements to 72nd Avenue. Chapter 18.98, Building Height Limitations: Exceptions; Our proposed building does not exceed the 75' building height limitations for a non- residential zone. Our proposed building height is 17'-1". Our proposed site is approximately 39,885 square feet. Our proposed building is 2,871 square feet, therefore, the building does not exceed 1-1/2 the area of the site. Our proposed structure does not abut a residential zoning district. Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and Screening; See information included above Chapter 18.102, Visual Clearance Areas; See information included above Chapter 18.106, Off-Street Parking and Loading; See information included above Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation; See information included above Chapter 18.114, Signs; R78dev\const\taylor\TIGARDSUB.doc(02/11/97) Page 6 McDonald's Narrative A free standing sign, for our use, is permitted with a maximum square footage, per face, of 70 square feet, and a maximum height of 20'. We propose to install our McDonald's 70-40 Road sign, the actual square footage per face is 54.53, along with our 2'x9' reader board below. The actual square footage of the reader board is 18.75 square feet. A wall sign, for our use, is permitted with a maximum square footage of 15% of the building face , which the sign is mounted, unless, by design review it is deemed advantageous to increase to an additional 50%. We propose to install our McDonald's Unibody Fascia Sign on the West face of our building. The West side of our building is 629 square feet. Fifteen percent of the building face would allow a sign 94.35 square feet. The fascia sign is a total of 31.32 square feet. We propose to install our McDonald's Unibody Fascia Sign on the North side of our building. The North face is approximately 1,479 square feet. Fifteen percent of the building face would allow a sign 1,479 square feet. The fascia sign is a total of 31.32 square feet. We propose to install our McDonald's Standard Arch, 60"x72", on the East side of our building. The East side of our building is 629 square feet. Fifteen percent of the building face would allow a sign 94.35 square feet. The McDonald's Standard Arch is 35 square feet. Directional signs will be installed at the access drive onto 72nd Avenue. These signs will not exceed four square feet per face, nor exceed 36" in height. These signs will be installed within the visual clearance triangles created pursuant to Chapter 18.102. Chapter 18.150,Tree Removal; There a two existing trees in the Oregon Department of Transportation ROW, which we have been given permission to remove. According to Mark Roberts, with the City of Tigard, no mitigation will be required. Chapter 18.164, Street and Utility Improvement Standards; Easements, Sidewalks- R7 8dev\consAtaylor\TIGARDSLTB.doc(02/1 1/97) Page 7 McDonald's Narrative We are presently working with the Oregon Department of Transportation to vacate the existing utility easement, along SW Pacific Hwy,and create a new utility easement. Pursuant to this agreement, we will relocate the existing 12" water main. Presently, there are developed curbs and sidewalks along SW Pacific Hwy. In our pre-application conference, it was determined that 72nd Avenue will be improved and the City of Tigard obtain additional property to include a 40' ROW from the centerline of 72nd Avenue. We propose to develop these improvement the length of our proposed property on 72 Avenue, along with curbs and sidewalks. Public Use Areas- Not Applicable Sanitary Sewers- We propose to develop a 6" sanitary sewer lateral,for service on the Southeast portion of our proposed property, with connection to an existing sanitary manhole located near the centerline of 72nd Avenue. Storm Drainage- We propose to develop an onsite storm water collection system, which storm water will be diverted to a Detention/Water Quality facility located South of our proposed site. Additionally, we propose to develop a service line to the vacant, west property, for future use. This system will be connected to a curb inlet located in 72 Avenue, which is part of the City of Tigard Storm Water Management System. Tree Removal-Chapter 18.150 See information provided above Land Division: Major an Minor Land Partitioning-Lot Line Adjustment, Chapter 18.162 Our proposed development will be a land lease with a legal description, therefore, no land partitioning will be necessary. R78dev\const\taylor\TIGARDSUB.doc(02/11/97) 1-28-1997 5 42p FRO' P. 1 •McDonald's Corporation x(340 Si'Y Z eadt s :i ,w2 O Lai a Os�e�o O�Z 9703 RECEIVED PLANNING ■ il '1cFA1XI JAN 2 9 1997 Date: /—?-5-97 CITY OF TIGARD cumber or des including cover sheet: Z To; From: 4& :. Will 0„_,Arcircok. Phone: ?hoot: 503-684-9334 Ext FAX: &t/ 7 29 w _ FAX: 503-684-0153 CC: .4 REMARKS: 0 Urgent 5/or your Rzply ASAP ❑ Tlit:cccnrazat (ozoowworrrsVa r+st(a25I95) 1-28-1997 B 43PM FRON' P. 2 f McDonald's Corporation 5000 S.W. Meadows Road Suite 200 McDonald's 503/684-9334 Oswego,Oregon 97035 503/684-9334 Fax:503/624-4105 January 14, 1997 City of Tigard PO Box 23397 Tigard OR 97281 Re: Stewart Trust REVISED MEETING DATE Dear Interested Party: The Stewart Trust is the owner of property located on the SWC of Hwy 99W(Pacific Highway) and SW 72nd Avenue. They are considering proposing a site development review for a McDonald's restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, representatives from the Stewart Trust and McDonald's Corporation would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL--Town Hall Room 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-684-9334, if you should have any questions. Very truly yours, McDONALD'S CORPORATION Loy Ta Construction Project Manager r78dcv I[ncwdealsltigard721neighltr](1/14/97) 01/14/97 15:37 '®'503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 21002/003 RECEIVED PLANNING AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE JAN 17 1997 WITHIN SEVEY t7 CALEXDAS DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING.RETURN N T1DS AFF tDA City ofTiWWII Pillania g Division 13125 SW Hell Boulevard • Tigard.OR 97223 1, _G l enda- -f rI�o„ do arfimt that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed CL v etoprr itl- r'evi&4.) affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently registered) 5W C of I-fw y. 9'G N- S t_ 72 €i I3 e and did on the__ -_,__fl' day of a u 19 Sz, personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a T E D ongJgs Re to a rgil 4- application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at___ CeOrner of 10 fi at infer*ec-fie ► o /4th . Svc 72,1d A'-e. (state location you posted notice on property) _ cg ).,_ Sign* (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMP OTARMZE3 Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me an the i — 'y of , /11. . /L g. i7 re/14 _ i 4 /4 1 Ai /// i - 1 1 • - - •F • i •N :. Comn i siowtires_ ©(- H 1- " t . .. .M_ - M.„ RENE M NICOLESCU ` NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.041057 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 11,1999 [ (.applicant.please anaplere inior^ation below for?rop p cement with proposed p o ect) N..4-11E OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: c D , d- 0 e , '-u r, , TYPE OF PROPOSED DEvELOPNE`'T: 0 i - V'c a If t . :n I Na m=a!Applic r/Owacz: 6 O a f L. +' I C- 1 r rte)a , CO ' - '�ds-.as or General Locsron of Subject Proper): C M:I.. • el q e 51A) 7 Zn S I subject Prone_-:'a=Maps)aid Las=csk MIL l • 0 Ti-- 2000 01/14/97 15:37 0503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD Z003/003 i. ----'—= "- 4- =".--- -- : ECEIVED PLANNING AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING - JAN 17 1997 cnviv TIGARD STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. City of Tigard ) 1, GI ndcr_ Sly-tm being duly sworn, depose and say that on �dc i&,a rtj /5 _ 1911 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at(or near) s' 4. 9- g c so.) 7 2-d /iVe T9 and . 0,2 I a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I 1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said I persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Lake grOV& O� with postage prepaid thereon. Signa a (In the presence of a Notary Public) • (THIS SECTION FORA STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETENOTARIZ? Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the /5 day 0,i/�j //� , 19�D , , . r OFFICIAL SEAL ,' ' REN IN! N1COLESCU NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON apCOMMISSION r N0.041057 4 ;J M1 COMMISSION EXPIRES APRIL 11,1999 1,, ` .✓L• AA N sT• "Y PUBLIC OF OR G'a N . My Commission Expires:d i/l- gq (4pplimint. 71ease complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) •NAME OF PROJECT Olt PROPOSED NA E:_ rrlc L79-r-Ia(d S 62,e -f--A urant 'TYPE OF PROPOSED DE TLOP:4ENT: •1 A,'L/- se,rric Name of Appucsacavwer. St .' )71c- e , , S Co •• I IAddress or General Locution of Sunjec Property: L 0 lea •el W 7 Z4d uoj ?raee.�..Tax Hapt a)pad Lac e(a): tj r `Q TL 2-GOo 0 cAtCP:7 erd MEETING NOTICE bla Stewart Trust and McDonald's Corporation are proposing a site development review for a new McDonald's restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, the applicants would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL TOWN HALL ROOM 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 Project Developer Contact: Loy Taylor McDonald's Corporation Phone Number: 503-684-9334 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. /1777V at.tcbAt<i ri4 esTe cf-4 7-/1/- /7 ��� : // 11/To / 7:4 ''6-- Title FirstName LastName Company Addressl City State PostalCod e * * * Alprop 6149 SW Portland OR 97221 Co. Shattuck Rd. * * * Duane PO Box Portland OR 97242 Company 42121 * * * Galvan& 11619 SW Tigard OR 97281 Guitron Pacific PTR. Hwy Mr.& Meldren Anderson * 11570 SW Portland OR 97223 Mrs. Pacific Hwy #B Mr. & Jerome Franceschi * 37 San San Rafael CA 94903 Mrs. Mateo Ct. * * * Oregon 6900 SW Tigard OR 97223 Education Haines Assoc. Road * * * Tigard 703 Vancouver WA 98660 Cinemas Broadway St. #605 Mr. & Kenneth Franceschi 37 San San Rafael CA 94903 Mrs. Mateo Ct. * Phyllis Stewart 621 Lake OR 97034 Englewoo Oswego d Dr. * Donata Stewart 621 Lake OR 97034 Englewoo Oswego d * * * Metropolit 4012 SE Portland OR 97202 an Tri- 17th County Avenue Trans. January 14, 1997 "Title» "FirstName» "LastName» "Company» "Address1» "City» "State- "PostalCode» Re: Stewart Trust Dear Interested Party: The Stewart Trust is the owner of property located on the SWC of Hwy 99W (Pacific Highway) and SW 72nd Avenue. They are considering proposing a site development review for a McDonald's restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, representatives from the Stewart Trust and McDonald's Corporation would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL -- Town Hall Room 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503- 684-9334, if you should have any questions. Very truly yours, McDONALD'S CORPORATION Loy Taylor Construction Project Manager McDonald's Corporation 5000 S.W. Meadows Road Suite 200 McDonald's Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 503/684.9334 Fax: 503/624-4105 January 14, 1997 Craig Hopkins 7430 SW Varns Street Tigard OR 97223 Re: Stewart Trust REVISED MEETING DATE Dear Interested Party: The Stewart Trust is the owner of property located on the SWC of Hwy 99W (Pacific Highway) and SW 72nd Avenue. They are considering proposing a site development review for a McDonald's restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, representatives from the Stewart Trust and McDonald's Corporation would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL -- Town Hall Room 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-684-9334, if you should have any questions. Very truly yours, McD ALD'S CORPORATION Loy ylor Construction Project Manager I r78dev}[newdeals\tigard72\neigh2)(1/14/97) McDonald's Corporation 5000 S.W. Meadows Road Suite 200 McDonald's Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 503/684-9334 Fax:503/624-4105 January 14, 1997 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard OR 97223 Re: Stewart Trust REVISED MEETING DATE Dear Interested Party: The Stewart Trust is the owner of property located on the SWC of Hwy 99W (Pacific Highway) and SW 72nd Avenue. They are considering proposing a site development review for a McDonald's restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, representatives from the Stewart Trust and McDonald's Corporation would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL --Town Hall Room 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-684-9334, if you should have any questions. Very truly yours, McDONALD'S CORPORATION Loy Ta or Construction Project Manager (r78dev I[newdealsltigard72\neighltr](1/14/97) F jy • 7 m 431k, McDonald's Corporation 5000 S.W. Meadows Road Suite 200 McDOnald'S Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 503/684-9334 Fax: 5031624.4105 January 14, 1997 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard OR 97223 Re: Stewart Trust REVISED MEETING DATE Dear Interested Party: The Stewart Trust is the owner of property located on the SWC of Hwy 99W (Pacific Highway) and SW 72nd Avenue. They are considering proposing a site development review for a McDonald's restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, representatives from the Stewart Trust and McDonald's Corporation would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL -- Town Hall Room 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-684-9334, if you should have any questions. Very truly yours, McDONALD'S CORPORATION Loy T Construction Project Manager f r78dev I f newdeals\tigard72\neighltr](1/14/97) McDonald's Corporation 5000 S.W. Meadows Road Suite 200 McDonald's Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 503.684-9334 Fax:503/624-4105 January 14, 1997 Pat Wyden 8122 SW Spruce Street Tigard OR 97223 Re: Stewart Trust REVISED MEETING DATE Dear Interested Party: The Stewart Trust is the owner of property located on the SWC of Hwy 99W (Pacific Highway) and SW 72nd Avenue. They are considering proposing a site development review for a McDonald's restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, representatives from the Stewart Trust and McDonald's Corporation would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to a meeting on: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 29, 1997 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL -- Town Hall Room 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD OR 97223 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 503-684-9334, if you should have any questions. Very truly yours, McDONALD'S CORPORATION Lo T for Co ruction Project Manager {r78dev((newdeals\tigard72\neighltr](1/14/97) mcDonakrs Everbrite 24-1/4" x 18' (61.6 cm. x 548.6 cm.) - STANDARD 17" x 11 11" (43.2 cm. x 363.2 cm.) -SPECIAL 13-1/4" x 8' 9" (34.3 cm. x 266.7 cm.) - SPECIAL Mt 0 n - , u Sign Available with 48" (121.9 cm.), 30" (76.2 cm.), or 24" (61.0 cm.)Arch in Place of McDonald's "M" Standard Arch Sizes(by height): 60" H (152.4 cm.)x 72"W(182.8 cm.) 48" H (121.9 cm.)x 58" W(147.3 cm.) \• 36" H (91.4 cnn.)x 43" W(109.2 cm.) 30" H (76.2 cm.)x 36" W(91.4 cm.) 24" H (61.0 cm.)x 30" W(76.2 cm.) 18" H (45.7 cm.)x 21" W(53.34 cm.) Mall and Alternate Formed prismatic letters and arches Store Front Sign Pigmented polycarbonate face materials Drums of sheet aluminum Remote transformers Individual mounting brackets UNIBODY FASCIA SR S fY\ cDonalø a 19'-2' 1 A A o 3'S 3/4" I��CD- � a S �1 1_I a S X5/8" II 6'-0' _ ,_ I 110' I MCD ()Inlaid' S w 1 18'-2" 2'-2 51/8" hVi 0 • 0 n • ,ral—-- --1-cd-T fa- I : _ ,..__ ..... 1 6'-0" I 6'-0" 1 •40:11[ / SPECIFICATIONS: WITH LOGO LAMBING: (4) F64T12/CW/HO (2) F96T12/CW/HO 4'1" BALLAST: (1)Jefferson 256-696 WAD: 5.0 Amps CIRCUIT: (1) 20 Amp SQ.FT.: ACTUAL(34.43) BOXED(65.64) WITHOUT LOGO LAMBING: (4) F64T12/CW/H0 (2) F84T12/CW/HO BALLAST: (1)Jefferson 256-672 Plasti-Line, Inc. LOAD: 4.0 Amps CIRCUIT: (1) 20 Amp \ K noxville,TN 37950 P.O.Box 59043 VKnoxville,FT.: ACTUAL(31.32) 1•800•444•7446 BOXED(39.56) 70-40 ROAD SIGN .. Fi iaIr kt i W-8" 1'-2 5/8" 7'-21/2" 54 3/4" 3'-2 3/4" i 97)8" IIVtcD o I 7--- g f 1 51 /2-I I G 6 u=��n ( 1 7'10" Variable Viiili 11tre. ��1' 1 011' fie ,° REPLACEMENT PANEL DETAIL 2 4 if V SPECIFICATIONS: 6 CAMPING: ARCH (4) F42T12/CW/HO (4) F24T12/CW/HO EMBLEM (3) F84T12/CW/HO (2) F36T12/CW/HO BALLAST: ARCH (1)Jefferson 256-448-100 EMBLEM (1)Jefferson 256-672 LOAD: 7.8 Amps As Plasti-Line, Inc. CIRCUIT: (1)20 Amp SQ.FT.: ACTUAL(40.48) P.O.Box 59043 ACTUAL(54.53)including space between arches j `\% Knoxville,TN 37950 BOXED(66.89) 1.800.444.7446 i ' READERBOARDS [61 8'_1„ 11- WELCOME TO 3,_0" MCDONALD'S 9'-4 1/2" WELCOME TO 2 0„ MCDONALD'S INCLUDES: •220 pc. 6" Letter Set •Storage Box •Changer Arm SPECIFICATIONS: 3'X8' TAMPING: (3) F96T12/CW/H0(per cabinet) BALLAST: (1)Jefferson 256-496-100(per cabinet) LOAD: 3.5 Amps(per cabinet) CIRCUIT: (1) 20 Amp SQ.FT.: ACTUAL(24.34) 2'X9' LAMBING: (2)F108T12/CW/H0(per cabinet) BALLAST: (1)Jefferson 256-372-100(per cabinet) Plasti-Line, Inc. LOAD: 2.0 Amps(per cabinet) P.O.Box 59043 CIRCUIT: (1) 20 Amp Knoxville,TN 37950 SQ.FT.: ACTUAL(18.75) 1.800•44497446 90-5 DIRECTIONAL I N elcome 3'-0" 5 3/4' 2.8 Iiiiiiiiiiiiiaini 3 4" 1'-3' \\ Lilo I/ 2-0" 2" —4' drive-thru exit thank you .....,\ elome C enter welcome •Custom Copy also available SPECIFICATIONS: TAMPING: (2) F30T12/CW/HO BALLAST: (1)Jefferson 256-272 LOAD: .80 Amps Plasti-Line, Inc. CIRCUIT: (1)20 Amp P.O.Box 59043 SO.FT.: ACTUAL(3.52) Knoxville,TN 37950 BOXED(3.75) 1.800.444.7446 L • • j' !1e 1F-1119--111141L.11-7 E'"V'r-P:".1 'c'E."...6411-1 -,„„,•••,..,„ • /41:', �� l/ '� / / .wuc�10.1•1110 en.w .inn.m.r.• �I I�Y1 I /\ ' 1 GRAPHIC scus / r % / ,/ / 1111.�'' /a."w.41.:.:' �3 j t ,.. •1'.'w': .:w.,".:a. r tt m_�m�• / , / �/0{ ., '.f �.n•• 11 lk • , 0110.1«ve:1i...•m1101.10.w•••a•re . ��''•• • • �y/ %/ / l / r "...#` � "ww.. r'`] ...,C , •1 , a m..iv w�goaann.:am�w e... �ROATION �pI 1,l 644 e TV 0a.00 / Q / �/°/% �" ��`I f �'� 0.4'°.0 l••••••• m:.m'Alt w eeai°"" VICINI TY MAP• '•.'./ ." 1. V lT..�*'� k /•y \\ `, 1 ~Yj „ '\\ • :.w;•,.o.�mo.�....CO.n.nw::n~. .. __ .r 8,044.0/0.- ,• 'l• o.• / � - ��� r +,«.^*: .,, w•w.. . u. 00010111•IM'a....kora a11"°'6`.• 771 1� • ,.. ) .', 4 .::» m s� «. ..aura AL=TO 1(��1 11.140 (() " w.°•ma.. ^•,.,•1111.•. �� �:...�.M w...° ( / Yw'.d! ..M .. _,a'�•±�. � ] �� \� Ir 1nI21.[ Iw IM 9i1Mavn. i 1 RI 000100.14.1.fort.4,',S / � � 111�� rA s'n '..'..moue.°a"1M°w"R viw i So..."n7....10..... u�..... ,.7.?,. p,1 ! �.O 0'oi1ll�s 1 •mn:<'.a 1111•.11.0..,....<]•. . NW.al..1. ,;� YOOO (� iit �`� � -Caaicl.....'"... ., +canon o rw0,0 = ^ ,. ....o.]v. cw•0..0 INALw Tr• 00a11.11.1.441A 111.000.1 0 1010.0.1010,•• .wL ,1 . • �' .•'9iO;, +m...v"�•.s i� ..'rw•eo�i..ey'sw.ge w+tnrr. a .i wa v.�•.u�*w.i��a..�.n.u'w+..�w . .=.�aw,t �Y�' 1:11 �� ,i •Owa,. n.... :u u _. •.'°.°°' ]r •1.1IK M•.12,.101O...x•m.aw]w..,n....Mal 10 010•0•0 16 � � y 00.•.1.1 .010.0:>��ra.TO ."` .:�,.�.........a.... m•, ;ft•10101 ��\ / '�. ,l `�©gellllam' f. ..,w.:,.u �1�1 ��,' '� `c. __ m ow.,� 1.0 o••.on"ie°a. 1,111•.. y' ( / \• •Tee ... / i"/�. jj1' --#!-Yl2s.-.. 'L•�,a°."..'la+ 001-w011."”70... ... ..,o. ........1.. '..\\R.. �� 1 ( I ,j. EECEna ..,R.w .•ti 1111. .• �,A -`W:.'•..o:. .°.tea ^:'°•.'° ° ,,„ ,. : A .,.. • 1' •' yy .y �_ _ f m r....Qr..... ..i w..i mans...,o..b-...,.. 1s....,o.. °"'...-Varm°.......e..nen a.n ii 1 f`% •^,te 1_.�� �� 1 11. , ai vr.sNO'- w T 01..00...m e..an. -s 1 _ - / I 1 co a'MN COMM to all.; a. m.vw 00+w•• re,m. w r1 ,Y...w.a.n w.ii•••••••.w.•. ` Ulm _ 1 ij Z I O r lm s !I!i..w.'."` .°.`e'a w'.•w wu. . - �"•e.:....1.a w/i� ra �' 1�s` I .:... �.�.:..A1.!_x~ 1.1�. .w 1111.r 0101 a �; wa.ns.ro.w 1..., . �R!al,x ] ,wr ..,1,1,11�....,..... a 4.. 1..7.r.a k C9 _ e I I :" a° I�.,a...1,a],.01...1 Y ry •^ .._ ..- 1. : ... .•>w. ..•�.. a Ii' �R W1.A xa .1•..O li 1 / R. i-s+i 1111.:F.a:'.•11"x++7 w..,m a NCO.v ••oa..x•M1.m+ua.oc.+ CC i kV I _ * tuner A - r� ,/ Jl� n MR....7.11.....101...711101011=0.6....1.....0111......o.�n .a.a"�iarwa.�w•10001 0100117.. ,A 114.OAS TALWIL.so.0.411 70 /sip' jrj I ..,01.01 wpl a.w.a 1..wn.U1 eu.r�r.�awr�:...W i $' 1 � ' 'ft. w...- w+<c.ro..e.e..e aw 0111 .. ....a .••w.....a•..0001•01•05. ° Z_ f1e1ODIC•010111.01 awurr 00.10� .W_ n, ` ✓�1111/10.1 �* It U R wrllsfnl n C Y. „ ..w..ro.R w..+.M 1.rsr.+.. '°Q]1111 woo.1.00 NUM 00111.Cle \ \,,,��� i / I nn.lw•v 0(1..01..7.150 ....wen. pa 7 1 " _ .a w...........v...<. 8 \=� .�„ IE _ ..lU,w,un,.r,0110 n +7701.01 ,1111....aa.....m. . I• f . • w:1700 ..0..11 10 w.....•TO.a..... F \\ .7M I I.. wv f.1.r! rtuew Y�tO'"w'9•�il.m...w mrv..1••.an SHEET _ 1 4 ....I,'E. M.2.WIC MONO 211 •• 1 I ax..I ':.Ouril• ,-+•OF-+- �_ • I •1 'O1.n 1108 NUMBER t 1742.057.0 / .f.er awe Pow• --r.II. /. 04.C.NO.».Oro*.C.• LEGAL DESCRIPTION SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE •N•(/1 r !r.Sr.t..•.•.. / /• .•y artily a r' r N«N4...e Corm, tat..C...... •weer.1 WI N.r w r.s).V••1 arty AL r.■x.e. /' L w•c•w....to w1..«e.•O.r..a«�iM:. rw•.Y,m. w •.•.• ▪ r •I 4.0...Or C•.o._b . I ....I hr•..✓.•r.slrl,1•w• r...10 ,wM m,WM.4n ••••s w war• «s.1•,10.nn, 1•.1.r r ear M.«w.w n....µ.•tart r.u.I. •e Newry M•w4«N MM., y / •/` a4P.nM'••C•••«•1••Y ma F S a ry•on I••• 11•••m CSU lM a am man a c n..1...1 tr.r r c. W4��. N ✓A- / lorry.;r ,u or 4 Mo.,0 ry•r No rN nC' a j . \ / .y 4 f✓I .W....s 1.n.«CS✓i)n WIZ w • N s!µr• O.•ri.•0•C•C44•N•.Si/Now.. 4•. /err F .ESN 4...«1•n•rt..I for ortr1.1./•1«✓M w Nrww«CYO,s.I4 1•.131• . !j1•I:.1•: .warm 1 4 N'1• NY10.• M.Kt.toot to 1.l••I.hMl h•111Mwrn. Y .41;4. / I °, 7 ;n......,.. xL. r•�:•• '� 1•i �I' i '�• - i ..._P Bad....• X4'17 1•rN«ta )•olwb.51.1..•x.•0 a MI N we roc - '9 •7010 W.W.I.Carty a•I...NA,IMw••«•N MN..y / / / r" 1 I Srr.«I./�w.4• b•S•M•MI•,4'JJ10l�'r.r,Yixl .1 n« of w.1•r NY•••. a •\ • ••.a III AO 1111 al. C `0.No..114.0 Noy..0 row of•,I.wy SCALE,I•-20• �• (....(...NOM f •N»•Y NSI.M.w•.1•I.4N.Woo" / / *+'` / •Alf M f •to•«M M.1 I.01'f. I C M.wm»•10'O•frt.t•• Illrrr c ..r)• . •N 1.1 1.••...1•«e.••.... of.•r / A so O ` i. S.W.ro 11:I••w• roc..n 1. ••u•- °:'""Nicww"eTwiri.•':isil..r:••••••or/4. �a�rr // i4','(// cam ✓ t..i-�Y�_ i r ! .--SO an ..•.,,,, uv• • .�e ;,:r.w. rr-4f 1•y ra.�w..i.y+ n a•w G1{ a 00 , �f«• /,• Nat 6{ I •r'NNI-1n•• 1•x••% •••ems..••y «Nr.Z.v.r �q•'a4«.Tate.iNr.i V70'f«r,.s o I•s.1 / %Cr •' , p//1� i - 77:4---- :woe Morro II*.«t**.ow x..y70 Aro / a -0.? �..I,b / /JlbL�y J t 1 • rv23• Mr.9111 1•.I:M••1••wi4 N*I1••r ,1••H Jr-S v �• J4 // 17 r / , 1•w/ C{. '1.1 1 Y h.0 1•rn 1•.e°a1•°r.Sw).)'...W...Ilt 33 hoir-...�r / /,/ y P/ H i 1f) / L� ;y, •W 1{ CUR VF TABLE••*•I 1S•»'11( 1••r•S.r..r.N•O•W.••JO.toot �, $ r wan A. r, W : 1` Y .•■ ' 1 I CO. DI r•Ark( ...US MK CNene CMN L.•wS we...•I 1reJ••r r•of:Nom`.••••••••••••the we.r•tree 1••• / 5' �s/ //16,' � v it 41.•1.1. ^ _� I c r n•»'»• 50 00 3t.1. moo ...car. • M'•r.rv•••1•••r 13•.1•43• / // 2/ r x •• .✓...• . •m•..a.N N 1•..U.«a.,1•.•r as N /• . �- ) / // ,■Ty :/ y t --.11 Il 1 C) NS,1•U• .300 On. 10.c .°w•.•1••.q Mr.;No..S.W..srw.•e)0 r.5 for.....1 w V .. )..wear / at /1•300•s.sr�'.r!i✓t- w �'•,°,�1')1' I c 1 nn•.• 130 av a.•3 or.n•. NN 1•.I..1•w era.r.m•rot t.1•••e.1.1• / / / / ,'�(,1, L.t ,t l °maul 1 °: ).0 '1 • •5.311• ...» 6.10 a 0 ortr••r w.i 1613.34•(rte•••.•w•••0r4I•..•r,a•3 I•.)• ,I/ / / 9•10, l J-t•° c •n .r a JI 1•..1:■••••..wI.7•0•101.f..1113 Iwo. / _ , ,1, 0(`11/. 4 f4.Y•rt.• t / f;-`:,' I r J 1r5°'v Moo as! n•.1•77•1• etr.•lie0.1 m.ore•• • 30 ANN.0 M tree w I.for AA. b W .2;x;',11 !,•N'tlT C• 1.1•0°16• 50.°0 L n.0 41•»'1••. ....•1•r yy.. 13.1••(ewe...a we.Mr". . / 1 3/ . ° L ON 1..1•).I..r.•e••1 02e a.1•:N.1•..wIa I'!•'x3• /• / ° ��/ , - S .W� 1.•r )».I.1 I 1 1 • I C• )4-10..1i• SS.. • SIMOSS, ...43.Not.••ortt r.1M..mry•4•■•n.••.•t• • �t C a .w.wr4•e• af'(.r.r. �:,.t1• / ern ('f / •,, Y" , t /j Ib l I I c a '/ree''ns a.0M0 n i n.ra.1t i.N,•r•• /./ / ;/ b�•• �,s, �. .,Iry c n r•0rv,• rel.0 n•J Mt 3.I Ir316•• . f/ , ',1•1 ... / To-_-----•168.1 i e I I c 1•1 M•n• 1.0.16 3.41 s erN•M'1• L s•WOO. ••NO 41.00 »33 •3••0•1.1 // �" .s'.•7• A/ 1 \ ♦ t,l• I • 1 Est Y e`�..r-- Ile 1 ` c r. r /. •• ,,1.1• .. , y �,.+;A.. °`�; -;N - 1 I t - '1 ,/ b6y Y'F `;;+4t.• ▪ %.. - • �---..”-266.. J I.:1 L- 11 i / / , 1�.�t1.43;,• ,;i _ '-`;ice`_, ?,., ------_--1,i 5 . II w\. .L\. \ 1 ,r ,4• -- y_ - ' ........ �'1 _ I .5✓. A". `N\ %5 0/\� .•f . .ate•``` - ... _-_``-r?61 --..f_" 126261-31:';■I r ! c1 6.ZOO M .M `� • i YYi� ?• r ?JJI `` - _ _ f1 1•E \ 01.� d /'_� `` `fI. `Tian-_ - :•--_- --_ -�1 ' 1 f , i°-w1)_I.. Sr/' i /i / % •1 �`� - ^�P ^.- I:Ii••.. C P j•..�1 fMW/SN i,3irl / �/ /• -.".... • `.�,.. - PARCEL N_ I C! M•/.- :11�%/ // ``3J --....,v... ▪ _ -Ante.11.803 se-rt.- I • 1J - 0.1x3 RE. C / y 1 W may` .%� ` {j0•_ -------6- - - 138---.---_ -159--_ `,IL�r M '� LEGEND / 1 AOJACE CONTIGUOUS P�lr. 733__`' ------ _ ----157---_��111� 3 11€ g I AL TA/AGSM LAND T17Lf AND o_1• r 1•...r.. ` ••1•PARCEL `� � -�.1e. •,,„, .t __ =756--_ ______1Y4//, r ^1j� ^I� TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 0-:'I.Mr• ..---- .W s0 11 0 vas...-.>__ --._ __-N r -___---1S4�}! N• FOR: MCDONAL D'S CORPORATION• 1•c-1•w ..• ✓e .. `.� e•er I `-�� ___ -.2.50'..1'........ 1e _ 1 �^ I,. 0( (" I IN TNT S.E. I/O Or SECTION J6. ....- :Y i wore*..•.r.�.r........ •m IZ ."S .. ___251_w°arse. --I'-/1 • I j T. NT,OREGON W.U. I.-r. r.r 1 1ryL/74�. m• __ r 0, CITY Or IICARD, WASNMGTON COUNTY,OREGON 1•s.•1rrlk trey h. , t•Cr"1 130 `` -_-7JS•--_ /,�r•°51 C�•S �w I I-N,. . •0y3t 7� _'1'•1 pile- ` �=• �� _`~-23, • / �• t . " :y ���` ` 2so _ �1pe :il�- Sty �} 170'6- �fs1• r NO/[S i4 Piz 1'1•� 4- _� 'I7� - y13 x ortrjr j 1•.N E1 �� . ,.** f! II I j ersal l(4M4...•N«CN•r Iyrl°.•1•4 w.N•.).!,• •_ _ i .«r w•••m•••1 w1••■x1•. n1••••.••w N4 t1•3°•°, tw r••:•C•it M 1.•4••4 w..IOW.p _ 2. N.Oro ••••.....Nt Url.N••N4r•w•So.. \ { ` -71745-, ��.`/'�{ I I I r/.-wa w...•.:.•e,11•,.C.N 4.4 r.••.w.rot.rN4•r.1• ` ` ./ L M I • .' sNEE,r Or J 1.... \ t «GG .1/�o_r 1r•1.+�rNt�i••c..rr c..•.rr.r r.m...a.w.«y.e..4•..„r«41•.1. •` 1 ......'---- ,8 4...../. ^••T: ••r r I I REPPETO t ASSOCIATES 1•w••.1•.1.no*Op IWr Aar 4.Y.4ww.•Car.••.I bee« C I. / M n.sear aR«. 4 •`w«nr•INN I..N..Mini.1••N Ott*a 165,.we 1••.t n.1•wyr 1 ,!• e ` 443_ •• I • •^'•'•' LAAO SURVEYORS Peer r w1•.•«NN.....,•••••0 M alto.•••1•..1 r.rM n N.an NI•is... 11•. / I S.hew..M r••1•••r•r.1•••r our.,or"MO••••y•.C••••• s p •�:Ski,--1--217. /: / e:• I \ r 1223 I1111A•rrq AS-Ream 202 ' •; \ �..� _../ / i : ! .raw 1«.. Port/o••4 OR 07221 I arr.a-M-N• ••t •y-l.. 1•.• •• OW)a2-0133 / ire: 1• ..Str•.e a• m\ / •4..I-1.-N:•N I.•y 000 4w SRO '•••••••••• Dec**D it ON 0.W 1•..•.••b I.0.2 M1 t'�24C Mr 4000 2 r I I .r•...•1-,0-N.h..0••..•... S. Or.I.:J•I J.N.. •003• • • --,— , /, Ili ., :-... k P 7..stuort11Maalse..r..::14 .,. ...7.,. ...... • 7 lir.o..6.4. 7.1? ..... r..e.... .--?.•*- -.-... . ;Z.";et:•••••\ 1 i 3 / r ,.." -", 4 ..••••"00:77" ,•-•" 7",•••., Y'L'*Vg: '''''' , '-'2-.V.:T:•••:,•"•;1".?"".t..-7.•="--`7,XI: '''''-'"^'l'":::..'":7".•..n.:17..t,,?«.17:.::::: .0 '''. .7 7 V l' ,. -.. ..,.•':-.'t •...'','7' . . Arill ........,-........ ," -- v"„ oc, v ,..,.- ,e .. .„..,• . .,..1. otki, A-1-*\ 'i 1 4 s'arra,--;•.:7. . , ,/ ..- 0 .k. *tr InIZ 0' ;:?■.: Mr.Z.Z.:::=."Zr.11::rarZ=r::.::11.a..... ..1::..7=t r1:::•■■•::.■::=■••■■=er:e...... ';" .,.' ?I' ' '•04 ."7 ' C#4. ...1.... ....''' :';':.\Vi . i._,,..\ ,U.I - re' i . PM, ,- .:!,„/ S• ' • ,610. ..... . • -;•. .- „ , ,I .." •' . -' .....,, - 300,,,,,,.. • . • __,••••,,f.CRENLZRIEEk— ''t \ ::"...=r.•:,;..-::::.=-...-.1,zr-•:.,.--..:.•:::"..7. ,o „.m.1,„,...• "1•49 is•';...:°,•.•. 1 ...." 0 - , .4.,...,...,::::":1:1?.',.;•• ---- -------- ..• liprip •-' '4°141 441 .•• r ' 1....:_ :::1VVIIL:::7:-T4:::::::.;::' L77:2:4":;L::':::::?...r:1":7""11.:‘.::"*".7:: 3! . '0,PAN TA 1 I • '\ .cieSt. :,=...-r--.--- •-•-• — ------— I ; fig: ' • ...: eft. --I° .. 16., 0010,0:- IA, 1 ,..,.72. -1...rni.t....;=.........1:::="--r•--..•:. li,4-10,,t,,, ,140. Al i '!! . • • •.....'1! .44 . -- 151 ■ Qwwv• Aar • :=..:::::,---, ikip A.4 .......,..::::::,-, ;-,........,. .............. . . • ‘ 1 • -\ .,:::, A I lig, r.... •"••••••••••'•• .P i 1 I 410.:Nit n. i ..,••• :::' # .1111011lir .. • r.r.:41"..".t'l•••••••"'"' . 1 ../ '....... ' A'IN, 1 1 ',N.)-."..1 f• i f.t.'""L.:•••••11:...7.7:.'''""."1.:.:.1...."...."'1:; oe ..... ..... ; o ..• ... •, •.•• %. %rif4r 1 -1=.14 .4 • . ::=...Z."4.4;=■:1;.:t...r.=1::;11.r. ." . .. bilk' Aage / I '. 143-444 - "•-• 00 r ..... ..,/,,,rt 1 7.'1 • i rort'"..""' •••■••• •Pona•■■•••••• v./..c.■en....■......••..... rl...";YZ 4.:,...7■7:■---.:.‘-7:11r- 0 0 a•. 71::. - •*' .:At.)' .*I i - I . ''' ... • VA'. ,,, ■ AO — .. ki.—.4 A ‘ , ..,„ , ..e...,■:......WS .740:: . ,F,1 I N, ■m...a. - .'1,:,.....2=– 4,,,..F.aro . „................4.1.......:_,::''".:,.....". ....,.......... mr.1......1,...... ........,,,,v...1:,.=.:::......=....... ................ 7......,.....7:1,7.,...:1,..7............t=:....z.......7=... ..,,,. .. . 4041‘ pr'''.4. pold ••1 0 ;f 1 ..r...1-4Vr.."•::•`'‘ .7.:11,`"•-•'"-•'"'"."•"'""•• • ' .'"*. : •.'•.,..;:...,'••••Iri tat - - ,,,,•04?4,0 1:, 1 Nt. ArtegYfit.' NI n I. N ZAAAAA r'TY, .'".""'..."'"1.:::"""'.•".'-'7••••'"-•-•*"• . • •''•• i ' 441,Wgratr,' — E .1 i 1 i I . . ... • .46 • - .. :•viso t'' :*"-.4-." 110 il I 1 l' . . CO •NT....mom:........."? ,-.71 ma m•owe ft 4.... -. . • .-... - •':s. \ • /1 • ,...:. • ,_,..„ ,..... R . g I ..t/' . . *i.-.. • I I ' 6 .3 LANDSCAPE PLAN ...I 14 Z...-. . • • - i 0 cl k S.W. PACIFC HIGHWAY & 72 ND u . I TIGARD 1 OR. SHEET I JOB NUMBER A. —— / .• 1 -_ _0101 __ - - I - 0101- GEKe.E egR3 -. 0101. 1 / ,/ 1 I ' 01.01 w..7.,........ nu..a. .— ,• / nr / r / / 10 II 1 ....r..... ..... �.,nm l'i/// / // A...A 1w..aJ1 it: P _................ .°..a.oe. p� • / �', 1 it z,Z,/ ` I�`r."=to as / .� I / -- •. s.. 1 11 [rr ailsl-asr ra �� .N.......n..a......w.o..0101 F/ �G // Tf .Y , IQI!,'� 'EA' MEInT L [ t-K.2-737.2 1 IIIFNO•/ / �•G\...../ .A O ./ ".\�. T 1 1- !r I OA 11.11 M .°mow.P .10101.COCK,.b �ra n w.•...n moron,0101 N h '- —f /// / Q/ M .-WED' -A ENT O 1 oY i 1'.1 f_ ,74' 1 I . .�.r...Moen cum ...............r m..,••.. o /dr 5�// 12- / t�...1 I 1 I ©sac..sr[rw wm nroo..r«v. . O/ // •:_ �-� `,� -IMJ.01 1 I O�l'd. :o,�..:STALLS.0 .•r„your Are Nor or rum sr.vs c moo 01,01..n..00.1.U.A — / / // • ? yr y..•.1, �' . `` 'r'i.«w I I ©womca .m.wawwa1om ` � 'r:! L' S'a [s>re•1, t I OSLO Pas-.•r o.....rw. ...0...•..01...r......•. / / .A JK' ,ej31'x-P.)00� d_/ 00 1 I O�°01r�iO9nm"evi nisi m..'f°o.lo,.os. 1 / / : M r N MOOR 11ERC.a. , w, �' f-r 111 Ili.O 1 I Q711MA ow=.w.O-••nc.r n) ® M 11 II --- - .u.emseo•i.40.1 01.01 _ -t1,!0 • / •�/IIlow-. �1 U '� 1 R Q«-11A owe...a-•mw.vat l,) 1301..3....w....r.c.ec.s v..0..K S.on a �!- - /'t`I .0/44W f, '®1 O 1 O I I ©«-.««,e nw•w•.sAr.o..wo..lcnn.a wsun w!..ei•mn.vic uSIG.I'wev s....!s w .--i O euG01i rAwt \ . / i 0101�:,.�, O a! [ RAM wl WORM o..wis.AO■.MEO .....1r COMM s.nAAo«am a.w mow w..c jw'�: /,.......,'":t4� O ' © © •I I I 0 w�srs.n. 00.0,eusmo.19 ww 1.a'<.awmnwuc.m. F•/k 1 - C '� r- 1 I I O nwno r.o.s..w nn+sx aerta..e�«rya...w.un s..a..[.rmNxi i+n0� / �y y. ii n 1 raw+t as no WISER w.an s+u! P MIWO/Wr.1' meµ \ ..s- / sY O[ ! © �I1IIIIIIIII I ( n Qo lo..r.r ie..oemo MC.rw Mom.11. 'x' «' .��"r. Ei d 1 / 11"„ �v/ C' ® r I ®r a.w NOR. i M' YY 317.1 yn2 '.\ l�pe�i s' ../ ./' O� %', ry1 [M1-a1.9. Q rR..a .�LOT 11.1.0 ecw..E OOAOOe 11 &s `✓ .�/^ O `O. % l i I f os1¢w..m.IT) LO ...APO OVUM ms.'°'OW.POLL aR. C i Et i r. i O iio '-o.1i © s 22-0 1Z ••••ss11��������/•' `ifJ I -.011.0 so rr ��.........M �: .� ,i nil I PARKING NrawA NON ■ jI Ala « MMO 0101[.--.g •« U iI .• O' ! "r ® aRi �'' d I I 29 'al 3 i. ` I I I o Gnus INFORRA1w.. 7 1 *I r"',' (•� i AKA: 3901485.13 5.1 'i I I v. c0. s'� aAwN 1 nw swore ME 1'J 41l• 09158 ACRES t� E . sr IN NTS 1 ° e Ir «.0n MN MO • l to O I e[w[s e..n« \, �� s yg9y, � I : i I ; ;I— [..nm.�G '.11WNW 1•„ � fr_: J Y/ 6( � , �v' I �;VII— I'w 0101 R I MEAD \ •� i OI I I 0101. ,..c.01¢011.— I.AN Y I PLAN SCAM 7[[v.•a k • ' 'O -- S'_ ` I HIGHWAY 9916 72ND ----- - oil t ." -- MATE STARS DAR w TIGARO OREGON mammon ,, so • 0101-- MATT WASHINGTON As-[LIST I I — 1 11E004K O.O.M CONFORMS IMO 116 ` PTD-321 xxxxxx C 1 • 0 .. .., • TAM eft tom / t 4 'i k no,, 2 crurluc scan: / .01.. Ao- A.Iva 1 } ? r • . r �� 11 L ' Ir ,, r..•ROOD POSTS. Il •RIO . ' . ZIP ...,:,.......;44,0'..1',...! , 7F }J L .' ` �\ srtn ruac rbtrs «• PP !� — Rr•'. t �� \ SEDIMENT FENCE Y� C.: Si) �, >.+� r 1 ` \I \ eDrtA• • . �'h + t_:• ••+��s .~_ \' l 1 \ ul IRDWP Aso WOW.tP+Ra R[AS.sa7 ue Ro R I^• .•y `\ �r...R77T-- a.rc....WALL cwawI,TO K C or ..oa •a•i�"' I T.O.o.w51•M.R7 .10 ReAAR..o mPOOM Sl broad.PP Mad, US we+sca s / 5 T —�I 1 { ..ef i•)„o a Wool(iT+. mrsn�+m w.•�oor+io..M iii:.o TAT., �(I�i� a l 142/43PARY KOWA MO KAOWG Or Rs}OPTS 220 •43..s we 10 liC MOWCRO WWWWIT WW1 MM.We i/ • •// 9• t I Wa1P•. wo 11 WALL[W, O v wIO0R9ol3 awl w i •'' H; e •• '`y sTeRUTR..0r <M. eTP..e K if SOD rb• / �` :, Y �1{ t TMµAiS+TO KW]O.RO VW 110!.�IO4O r0 Rai — I TO i wTS .D m R.rtewP R PO.,W.e, �,. R WOa4 Ib+ROW 051 Rte(>)D..7 . ; QQ� I %�� `! wtMS.•"ilTS'iRKOTKIo.i Wow e.....r A Rom `. ..1.... 1•. Sir S Q' i I )) w ; ...KO AKiAi•a`C,Te T AS tRftb.S+m•• 16b.. ) Ic..7s•»s.IV ... .a. ..aoi wr.n.io RAMC evn.n •-.. •. a.aR AS KaRRM,. WORT won ow Woe cArtn T_.. f'f,. ►/ ; . WAWes rauowis mn,RRP.a aRIRaR.• +'� wSRal RT 0/0 RIrDR m Auv.TTP AR Pro.+co Ms 1 L/ .ar• _ llyu a • 1 SKIT m niter f•R wRAIWP W ..b..i(el MwD of ` • ,i' `t,'-'-. I I)I� ! n ra w wIttweet MO .a;R WWI. R7 mr 7 STUn.p W KS IWO.i \ " r .RSS" / 7 I x,R swtn.r.S.TITn 1 A. y pot,....;/ r e•:i�!-)i+�i. • m .1+IasAiei:eDr•iK.&MOW(.n`r..nc J WA 004 ..' 1 �. // % �• �o..a. rvr�.asrraasD MI \\\ .I •4 LI v( 51+0•++(a OWN a M RW WW1 R i!nil Tt'� - Y ��� �� I il L ESiENi2 O as ).ee Re Tm WeRI lo.n it W 7 ' •.® �� 1 1 L RAM Won Kem(D.a AM RC OR Owl R •S e „ %/// RR/ va Re PAD ti .a. ROD awa R al.Try 5 ••{ --- '�' I• Aelcnow a ROW OP i•-a OT.�u RrPw.x swsrW,esaTTin. 4 •r. 1 �77i ��,®� S l' i ' eV Kum.Wows 144 MAT. a i 1 ,' h) ..i., ' _ 751. 1�� il� SV II w.w+MwQ a POaa.01+e0./WOWS E #• 1 •:•�� _ �� 2(1 a w.i WIT. De ir1p'sc mrw SOWS onK.�iila� e� i 4 11 uawiuw+m ROW./nod K CARP K.S. e t ® „p pd.( �q 2j (• �`i ' GRAVEL ROLLS,MITT ROOM e.Sion TM T o..o e PPA CONSTRUCTION , P01INOCC 57 M O.Q. a 4". l -- / // "1 a sRDWP COMM Rlwes awl R CATS. t / - f� '/ - Q I.,_ ENTRANCE I.P,...,s CAW W T,moaS KNOT ow.R 1 i W / _ >Mr ' S oaf 0.00 MAU R PAPS AwA/ilt A um.CGJA.4 R 1.0C SAAAL '� 4i' 3 �i' si i t a°WO°N R TMDCDDwlo.lac of CONT. I / r... '� i ' � I s°1rs u 510100 wul WPM IOORDM I wrs 0 ( � /�' + " ! _ j a!•7arIR!t 3 c +T..D..R.A+Dasya.,.0 an..uT Meow ei.,wcS { " c°`;.I • 1�� sow"nomRm to.oSniD a was ITIMOIa.Rii+r w.e AO a WTI�� $ ' 3•"� I I,•• h °'iS•rwie�[i1i iIL'lm w°rT. RO lPa.KSDw SRMTa SS9R(e.WALL K ROMOD ■ �1 I ... sTraUirp P YR. OsRU+Ra u.l APtas KW.aneO I Z��� w•�' ,�' 1 rsD..sreMU seal R T[Seurien,siMUnO O 1 �re-, uiw.,rB�c: I I I +i a:dr.. l ��: r tii o d� I I I / o w us Z /� `: 'i OK 0 .a M 0000.ORRSD R CltwED M 0 ' I ,•!•` a Ail tTZrtwTROT.wiDaz uo oµts acc AO/ \ . > I 1 w. .�1;Y. T.."▪ TO RK sr.neD Dwesoni M ZO T r-r 01010.0 0.0734. C00011101 TTeb CA TntrT MORRO Cr • r RRL RWIN Oe RUR a MO WM MARC wb.T-a-v., _ ...olio sIDiOCiR ▪ "LOOK P PO.TOP OKS4R RN w 7.F� I 7-0.P STOW AS Ca4111IK DO. O.APO ��. V .-_„ ITS'Are..) WOW 0•0/ar 0/wouT a.e,swoop. \ STWTO.PraT[D w>. 17.wµ0 OA,ulto TO TOW SUTIONT AU I� A7Ta,PTO so.oRAn a.TO sRa.. OPARK OCAS.w www0 woo•nlr SHEET SEDIMENT FENCE - I I CRAM. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 4 . 4 • - I - ! -- — ( 1742.057.0 Vicinity Map 72nd & SW Pacific Hwy , 7 ...- _-- -raio .sz„„,,,ry_iiki . ....- ....- ,..... e 7-114) :petal Hwy .., #13589 7- 0 , ; , , 64. .1.. 1 , ' . /. ////./ ///,,,, , 1. . 'I' ! 1'--,-"..1.,.. d 4_, L / , / / .1 •• , . ./ J......: r////// '// / //// /// ...- .., ........ . , .,.... / / // '', / ////' I . ..: .... . . . • • opOir ,,,t. . ‘,.:...,,, / e ■ I aNr* 4' '■‘;‘."/// .z / ". ' : ! ' ' ' / .i... ''. /, / •..`tlf df. se° . ,- 4,i ^ / iI. 1 ' ; ..., / /.■ ' ', • 1 1 ■ • .... ' . • ///// 1 • 41 I ,...._ • - • • ,-,,_ i , s . . . , . ,i v ////,// • , • . • , , 424. , -4.- ..',.. .. . 4'6) 1/. .. .. q 4a // /// . . • Mt• /7/ • . i . . , , .. .. , , • , ,- ,.. ...,-, ,.. . •.... / ,//..•7/ /,'/'',7 ! . % -. .. i 1 — -- / ) / ///' , - , ..... , , ■ A i• I • I ' I . • • / %/ .' ' ' ■.- PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES n McDonald's Corporation 5000 S.W. Meadows Road Suite 200 (y\ CDonald's Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 ■ 503/684-9334 p Fax:503/624-4105 171-1 June 27, 1996 0 -61 iii" Tigard/72nd NARRATIVE McDonald's intends to develop a 3,900 s.f. restaurant with enclosed playland and approximately 45 parking spaces on the SWC of Hwy 99 and 72nd Avenue in the City of Tigard. The property is a portion of TL2600, identified as R285202 1S136DB- 02600, 3.39 acres on the tax rolls of Washington Co. The restaurant pad will utilize approximately 35,000 s.f. of the site. Additionally, McDonald's will develop an access road to the site from 72nd Avenue at a point approved by the City of Tigard. This road is intended to serve as a shared easement to access the remainder of the property as it is developed by future users. Utilities are adequate and available and will serve the site from 72nd Avenue. Project Manager Real Estate Representative Jim Sparks Glenda Stratton 684-9334 684-9334 Mobile: 314-8024 Mobile: 314-8009 Real Estate Coordinator Architechtural Coordinator Lynn Carey Candi Blaney 684-9334 684-9334 (r78dev}[newdeals\tigard72]narrat(6/27/96) '3AV aNZI r _ — __sr►xoa..,. , _,,,_ __ 1 44-- t 1 _ 1 1 g in; 1 i ni I of I la) —. 1 1 t 4, t 1 - _ X ,r, 0..<is to i winV • : �S T A M E R I C A N T I T L E I N S U R A N C E C O M P A N Y Washington County .********************************.******************************************* * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Reference Parcel # : 1S136DB 02600 only Parcel Number :R0285202 TRSQ:01S-01W-36-SE NW Owner :STEWART PHYLLIS T CoOwner :STEWART TRUST Site Address : 11590 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD 97223 Mail Address : 621 ENGLEWOOD DR LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 Telephone :Owner Tenant * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * Transferred: Loan Amount : Document # : 11480135 Lender Sale Price : Loan Type Deed Type Interest Rate : Owned Vesting Type : * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * Land : $664, 080 Exempt Amount : * Structure : Exempt Type Other % Improved Total : $664, 080 Levy Code : 02381 94-95Taxes : $10, 385 . 70 School Dist :TIGARD * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * Map Grid: 655 G3 Class Code : Census :Tract 307 . 00 Block 1 NbrhdCd : ZPHY MillRate :15 . 6392 Sub/Plat : Land Use : 2002 VACANT, COMMERCIAL Legal :ACRES 3 . 39 - r•• • * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * edrooms Lot Acres : 3 . 39 Year Built : 3athrooms Lot SqFt : 147, 668 EffYearBlt : feat Method: BsmFin SF : Floor Cover: ,001 BsmUnfinSF: Foundation : ►ppliances : Bldg ScFt : Roof Shape : )ishwasher : lstFlrSqFt : Roof Matl food Fan UpperF].SF : InteriorMat : )eck Porch SqFt : Paving Matl : garage Type : Attic SqFt : Const Type : ;arage SF Deck SqFt : Ext Finish: •*******************************i ******************************************* The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. ' 10 °lor ye R• , v1 \ - O g t 00°3O'W 1 a, ' • ,Z,1 �^ T" 1 53.20 k N v9 l 20�33 v NOI°40'W rC°q1µ �e ,t •• pOK •� • • • l •N I°40.E 2 e 7,f 79.86 N I°57'50"W 100 06 G• r° I TAX LOTTED ON MAP 0. o° •J� 1 1 'o 1 ISI 36DC •' 11 t J 11 NOt°30,E `r R11.?IA 75 ISO fe `� N o 9 ,* 1 A`, �A ° e a,". �'• r ' V IV o l' S30°12,W 180..O l; IN 08 n 'o f7 ., .071.0 E N,e•IO'M I •' C 4 4 Jew a tn 0 m ` A Cl a ' ` 're _ Jj V Q1 • ; �- l of a � F • 1 gC t� ^ \fir % C 1 71.1'7 N' 1 N ° - U m �4 24e.1e 9 b it I 791 f„ 0 'N 3.1 i 0 , s s O D .• \ ' \ \ \d, ..0 .n D � s \ • 6. : \ \ IN N \\\\: ^to \o S d:,.130 J `P A ° \ . \ co d.° v `. s • \ 0 \ 1 \ • I I EAST LINE A.111CHANDSON DLC \\ _Z6-4 �q 6iI ,1 S 51.02 1 I 3!4_03 r!0�IS_W. \ ._— S W C.R. 2 4 5 0 7 2ND _ AV E __I / 1 1 , __> z DRAFT Chapter 18. ,NIUE: MIXED USE EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT. 18._ 010 Purpose. 18._ 020 Procedures and Approval Process. I8._ 030 Permitted and Restricted Uses I8._ 040 Conditional Uses (See Chapter 18.130). 18._ 050 Dimensional Requirements. 18._ 060 Additional Requirements. 18._ 070 Design Standards. 18._ 010 Purpose. A. The purpose of the MUE zoning district is: 1. To create a mixed use employment district that is complementary to the rest of the community and the region; 2. To provide opportunities for employment and for new business and professional services in close proximity to retail centers and major transportation facilities; 3. To provide for major retail goods and services accessible to the general public, and minor retail goods and services accessible to the public which works and lives within the MUE district; 4. To provide for groups and businesses in centers; 5. To provide for residential uses which are compatible with and supportive of retail and employment uses. B. Guiding principles for the Tigard Triangle: 1. To support the Tigard Triangle's position as a rally significant location for a variety of commercial. office. business park and research uses: 2. To capitalize on and improve the Tigard Triangle's accessibility from Pacific Highway. Highway 217 and I-5 by creating a mixed use employment district which serves the community-, 3. To recognize that accessibility is the key to a successful mixed use employment area. and that the automobile will accommodate the vase majority of trips to the Triangle: 1 4. To support transit and other modes in order to maximize their potential: 5. To create a complementary land use pattern that allows for a number of trip purposes to be satisfied during a single visit to the Tigard Triangle. and distributes those trips over a broad period of the day; 6. To add roadways and utilities to existing infrastructure to accommodate future growth; 7. To include a safe, secure and convenient pedestrian and bikewav_system withir. the Tigard Triangle that links internal uses, and connects to the city-wide system: S. To integrate within new development the significant natural features found within the Triangle; 9. To use streetscape as a key element to create a high quality image for the Triangle and to establish people-friendly spaces; 10. To assure that transitions from existing low density residential uses to mixed use employment uses occur in ways that respect the livability of the residential areas; 11. To allow for the opportunity for residential uses within compatible employment areas. 18._ 020 Procedures and Approval Process. A. A permitted use, Section 18._.030. is a use which is allowed outright, but is subject to all applicable provisions of this title. If a use is not listed as a permitted use outright, it may be held to be similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43, Unlisted Use. B. A restricted use, Section 18._.030. is a use which is allowed outright, but is subject to specific restrictions and all applicable provisions of this title. If a use is not Iisted as a restricted use outright. it may be held to be similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43. Unlisted Use. C. A conditional use. Section 18.64.040. is a use the approval of which is discretionary with the Hearings Officer. The approval process and criteria for approval are set forth in Chapter 18.130. Conditional Use. If a use is not listed as a conditional use, it may be held to be a similar unlisted use under the provisions of Chapter 18.43. Unlisted Use. 18. 030 Permitted and Restricted Uses A. Permitted and Restricted Uses in the NILE district are as tollo% s: (P-permitted: R-permitted with restrictions) Use Categoric Commercial Use Types Amusement enterprises including cinemas I P Animal sales and services I R(I) - Automotive and equipment I R(l) Building maintenance services P Business equipment sales and services 'Y.- .1%2.::.g..- Building support services _+, Pi:r: Communication services j '„' _ `? - Convenience sales and personal services M•` r R41) r 1 T• •- . . Children's day care 1 .P'-F - Eating and drinking establishments i I �,;. P.::ytr 1 Financial, insurance and real estate services P,?.; ;:- Food and beverage retail sales 1 R(1) ,_% Funeral and internment services .•, P, General retail sales ( - - • R(1) . Medical and dental services I P Participation sports and recreation 1 .....P . . Personal services,general I P Professional and administrative services P Consumer repair services I P Religious assembly I P Research services P Transient lodeing I P Use Categories . - Civic Use Types Public agency administrative services P Cultural exhibits and library services P Public support facilities P Lodges, fraternal and civic assembly P Parking facilities 7 _ : P._ Postal Services = _ - --" P -'— - Public safety services P --� Residential Use Types Single-family attached -- • P •. Multiple-family residential .• P Single family residential - - • R(2) - ■ Home occupations P Family day care = - Py Industrial Use Types Manufacturing of finished products R(3) Packaging and processing - - R(3) Light R(3) Wholesale,storage and distribution R(4) B. Use restrictions referenced in the table above are as follows: 1. Retail and sales uses larger than 60.000 square feet of gross leasable area per building or business shall be prohibited ca.t of 72" .\vents. within the Tleard Triangle except for those areas zoned C-G at the time this pter is adopted. 2. Pre-existing housing units permitted. 4 3. All activities associated with this use, except employee and customer parking. shall be contained within buildinvts). 4. Permitted as an accessory to a permitted use as long as this use is contained within the same building as the permitted use, and does not exceed the floor area of the permitted use. 18._ 040 Conditional Uses (See Chapter 13.130). A. Conditional uses in the NILE district are as follows: 1. Community recreation including structures; 2. Religious assembly; 3. Schools and related facilities; 4. Hospitals; 5. Parking facilities; 6. Utilities; and 7. Construction Contractor's Professional Offices. 18. Dimensional Requirements. �. Dimensional requirements for all commercial use types. civic use types. industrial use ropes and mixed use developments including these use types shall be the same as the C-G district, Dimensional requirements for residential use types shallbe the same as the R-25 district, 13._ 060 Additional Requirements. A. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for all commercial and industrial use types shall not exceed 0.40. : •. - c - '. ••sc ,nI • .• _ ,o c', . I h c • requirement, B. On lots greater than three acres. general retail sales uses are limited to 30.000 square feet of gross leasable area plus one additional square foot of gross leasable area of general retail sales use for each additional four square feet of non-general retail sales use, 1S._ 070 Design Standards. 6 TIGARD TRIANGLE _ ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS --- . 1. • i , iv.„. ...--7 v/ ) t.� Z C-G '17... ) c-. r -1 1 I� . `. • I I � -1. 'V • .I IC-G I i i i LI i ; (PO) ! ~_ . 1 1 . I I E i C-G• ` =El.- `� 1 -__ ! 1 1 1 i t 1 1 — s General Commercial _`_ MUE Mixed Use Employment '- (PD) — Planned Development + . \ \ 0 400 800 Feet LIAL CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON-RESIDENTIAL DATE: -7- __6 STAFF: kIj,/ D'4//DRt 4 APPLICANT: / I �oLtatla. 5 CoV po"41o/1 AGENT: 5/M 5,7,90(45 Phone: ( ) 6V-1 Q 33'1 Phone: J I #94 4 3341 PROPERTY LOCATION: �Q I ADDRESS: �W �a v`KCS1' a& 72.1d W/ TAX MAPITAX LOT: /S/ 34 DB - ZC.00 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): SATE D VEGOP,41E&1T AEI//Et,✓ M/A/4e 64/V/,D 'Thie7i7/P,✓ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 3 GG°� Al)O WC.t COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: C-6t- ZONING DESIGNATION: C CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT f457 FACILITATOR: See- TEAM AREA: PHONE: 1503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: r sq. ft. Average lot width: — ft. Maximum building height: II'S ft. Setbacks: front ft. side —' ft. rear ft. corner — ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: kS % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /5 (Refer to Code Section 18. 6Z DSO ) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON Residential appGcationJPlanning Department Section Post-i ling request pad 7664 ROUTING - REOUgST Please L4 READ To f G5 ./(/ �G ❑ HANDLE ❑ APPROVE Pirr fj FORWARD ❑ RETURN V a (P / 1-1 KEEP OR DISCARD ÷"O G ❑ REVIEW WITH ME Date 1 From IN1 ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 1ot wide access easement. The depth of all lots shall not exceed 21-: times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lots) SPECIAL SETBACKS ----> ➢ Streets: 50 feet from the centerline of 11141,1j/ qF > Established areas: ki la feet from D Lower intensity zones: vliq feet, along the site's boundary. > Flag lot: 10 foot side yard setback. 14,1 c (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non-residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: > A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1 .5 to 1 will exist; > All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 (half) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a residential zone district. (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) PARKING AND ACCESS r Re q wired p arkin g for this t ype of use: lg►n/Cu✓Ct £s7 : I:50 DliIri✓4 AeLed Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): HS S 4aw-4 p/4 1.'? L Arp oys Secondary use re d parking: Parking shown on preli nary plan(s): ---bp No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: G > Standard parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 1 It ft. > Compact parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 1% ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.020) -7 > Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of B NON Residential appbcanoniPtanronq Department Section • Bicycle racks are required for multi-family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. LESS ,, icx7 Rf.A■AG Minimum number of accesses: / Minimum access width: 3 Minimum pavement width: Z�{ All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. lc)(, .dCod Drive-in use queuing areas: ZOO AQ\VE- ttJ (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) _ LKWAY REQUIREMENTS Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050) LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070-090) ca—EAR VISION A IU> The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. Sri 3° (Refer to Code Section 18.102) `-\\ BUFFERING AND SCREENING 30 7Z''o 3' In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, t,le City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON Residential applicationiPlanning Department Section • The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. l ft. along east boundary. ft. along south boundary. r ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along TRPt54f RI`a ,,xx and oe--' i4- DSCAPIN -_� Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of Bt least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.114) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations fo lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100-year floodplain, atural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staf' will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre-application conference based on a :ilable information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas. and thei boundaries. is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas - - i • h- .-fin• ••n .f - 2 • •v- . ' .- I-. I in.' -. • .l. .• ,i -. wi - development application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential applicatiomPlanning Department Section Chapter 18.84 also provides re ulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development i rohibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication of 100- year floodplain areas to the City f park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. (Refer to Code Section 18.84) REE RE MOVAL PLAN REQUIREME A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, srte ment re ) planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: • Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; • Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: ➢ Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; ➢ Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; ➢ Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON Residential applicationPlammng Department Section MITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: • ➢ A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. ➢ If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. ➢ If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: ➢ The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. ➢ The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) _ IARR The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS 18.80 18.92 / 18.100 — 18.108 X18.120 _118.150 18.84 _ 18.96 18.102 _ 18.114 _ 18.130 _ 18.160 18.88 _ 18.98 / 18.106 _ 18.116 18.134 —18.162 18.164 CT STUD As a part of the application submittal requirements, applicants are required to include impact study with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system, including bikeways, the drainage system, the parks system, the water system, the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.32 Section .050) CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON-Residential apphcationiPlanning Department Section • When a condition of approval requires the transfer tot he public of an interest in real property, the approval authority shall adopt findings which support the conclusion that the interest in real property - to be transferred is roughly proportional to the impact the proposed development will have on the public. (Refer toCode Chapter 18.32 Section .250 C�EIGHBORHOOD MEETINt The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. QIE-CYCLING Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: — - d11t - iL1 41tn:1,it 411WI!]aJ11z0 1111n11111 ..S _: PoTE 6 oN Co PRI 4E -&10E Pl&J "C A s poe Tirt toff m�t"�. DEQ1C.AR\c J coR c.)'tJRF ,4Tr,4Afl4 ff8eE7, ON Soc.)Trtee/ gT ec,,Ai Or TeoPeery Z 0 / 3T IJCi R* Vklf. �t pp /'aX�yQn}�e � CeQ+ S 1ia(4)h Peci si s,, a Ices w vteed `-a la.e_ rov1aed giroc� Q "r.eet -4"ttalf— fcoJ es a C p � ss 1j-dpe/vIQi4 GccesS Cv-o w1 Q ` t.4) s also e Li-co i'a . r A (9- L,K-Q7 Oc c* Ur st �l r r 1'/SK '1 S ,Te 9otk at.t ( z-Lc J l'vla +�p e. 2'l I Sit " ` ems '�o o 0S4 PROCEDURE / `� ✓Administrative Staff Review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON-Residential applicationlPlanning Department Section APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community . Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned, Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays of 430 on other days. Maps submitted with an_application sheltie folded IN ADVANCE to_8,5 by 11 inohm One 8.5 inch • 1 I 11e • • • • • • - • • ••- 1 • • • - • 11 it - • • . 4 . 111 ' • • 1 - • administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard 7f4iV V/Ai& COM MlS 5/O . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre-application conference(s) is/are required if an application(s) is/are to be submitted more than six months following this pre-application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. �� ofK to td2i $ 0),„,e/PREPARED BY: W/// NA.)/9g64 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 FAX: (503) 684-7297 h:\login\patty\m ast ers\prea pp-c.mst (Engineering Section:masterslpreapp-c.eng) July 5, 1996 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON Residential apphation/Planning Department Section City of Tigard, Oregon PRE-APPL1CATION CONFERENCE NOTES ENGINEERING SECTION PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of- way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (1.) (Z A to feet from centerline. (2.) to feet from centerline. (3 ) i S5 tut S `� feet from centerline. 01.1 w Street improvements: (1.) lL street improvements will be necessary along 7-" E. `- -r street-impr: . ---- - W. :— — ess • - • • (3.) Street improvements shall include 22- feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 3 Engineering Department Section C1CW `" _ 6i In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: (1.) (2.) Pedestrianways/bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: (cs;‘. ) The nearest sapitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in �Z- > w" <5 e Rbe . The proposed development must be connected to a public sanitaiy 'sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to 6c > L_ —to W_.t* . ice►- may . mle, ST6,-)= -f is c...l24-4Et----M-1 PM1 I`t p p, {c_ scr.E(2- f 'Try ble t 57444 SS lMv1 LA t y . Water Supply: The Tri -r t''`I Water laieti4st - Phone:(503) arid provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526-2469) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Otherirfaeffrfitst r - �q . caMwc 0 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 3 Engineering Department Section Storm sewer improvements: t Qom_ STORM WATER QUALITY The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of new impervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. (C2 P RkCAuT l . TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. (PN STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be performed within a public right-of-way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: 1.1'1( ENGINEERING DEPAR MENT Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297 n uogmlpatty\preapp eng (Master section preapp-r mst) April 23. 1996 CITY OF TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 3 Engineering Department Section CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639-4171. Staff: Wilt D,4/t/,Dfe4 Date: 7/19/4, APPLICATION & RELATED DOCU■ ENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization (z' C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies _ /g E) Filing Fee S 5EE Pet 50,46 SITE-SPECIFIC MAP(S)/PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies + 1 . Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 259 ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: L= (a) Wildlife habitats (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" _ caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 8. Location of existing structures and their uses t� 9. Location and type of on and off-site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11 . Location of existing dedicated right-of-ways LAND LSE APPLICATION 'LIST PAGE 1 OF B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies /S' 1 . The proposed site and surrounding properties a' 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension o 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area d' (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e' (e) Outdoor common areas 0 (f) Above ground utilities Q' 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site I (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 2' 8. The location areas to be landscaped 0' 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques e'r. 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 11. The location of all structures and their orientation ra' 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies l� The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1 . The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development r/ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report 0 (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated LAND USE APP!:CATION/LIST PAGE 2 OF 5 • D) Architectural Drawl. , Indicating: 40. of Copies . The site development plan proposal shall include: • 1 . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on-site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings czr 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces tY 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials la/ 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generation Estimate: H) Preliminary Partition/Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies /i." 1 . The owner of the subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's authorized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries 5. Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 7. Location and width of all water courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements 2/ 11 . For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right-of-N,vay location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross-section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 0, 12. Any applicable deed restrictions 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND LSE AP°LICAT10• /LIST PACE 3 OF 5 • I) Subdivision Preli ir, , Plat Map and Data Indicating: 4o. of Copies 1 . Scale equalin; 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one • phase per she..t ❑ 2. The proposed .ame of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map sh.wing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresse and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, survey. and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of applicatio ❑ 6. Boundary lines of ract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent ubdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels o un-subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines relate. to a City-established benchmark at 2-foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than 10% o 9. The purpose, locatio type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the propo,-d subdivision): (a) Public and privat- right-of-ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and privat: sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations fo parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and prof es of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes i dicated on the plans ❑ 1 1 . Plan of the proposed water •.stribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fir- hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profil_. showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for : reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of propos=. street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject o inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of fl. of all water courses & drainage-ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, -.proximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to b- used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upvn such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a dia eter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, in 'uding the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of s bdivision improvements ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcr..pings, wetlands & marsh areas 0 21 . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated i to a narrative and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USEAPPLICkT10NI LISA DACE 4 OF 5 )) Solar Access CaIc lations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h:•lcg:n\patty'anastets\lddist.nst May 23. 1995 LAND LSE APPLICATION/LIST PACE 5 OF 5 I May 5, 1997 „„ CITY OF TIGAR OREGON Loy Taylor 5000 SW Meadows Rd. #200 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 RE: Plan Check Numbers: 5-5C. 5- 6C.5.7C. 5-8C This letter is to confirm receipt of your building plans which have been routed to the plans examiner. As a reminder, the associated land use case(s) is/are: SDR97 -0001 - McDonalds Corp. Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case(s) • and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person(s) indicated on your final order. Your building plans are not routed to the planning or engineering departments; you must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review process. After the building plans review process has been completed, your building permit will not be issued without approval from the engineering and planning departments. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please feel free to telephone me and 1 will be happy to explain further. Bonnie Mulheam Development Services Technician cc: Building file cc: Planning Department cc: Engineering Department I:'.DSTS SUPIUC.DOT 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 1l )-a( 12 • PIr4 f (Z- -col INTERFACE ENGINEERING INC. Consulting Engineers 6542 S.E. Lake Road • Milwaukie, OR 97222 • Phone: (503) 659 -6394 • Fax: (503) 659 -9029 TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Tigard DATE: July 14, 1997 13125 SW Hall Blvd MATERIALS SENT VIA: Tigard, OR 97223 MESSENGER FAX X MAIL OTHER ATTN: Jim Funk PROJECT NUMBER: 97 -346 PROJECT NAME: McDonalds Corporation Items Included: Jim: Loy Taylor of McDonalds Corporation requested that a copy of the following report be sent to you. Please reference the following: Site Plan Review: 97 -0013 Please contact me with your questions. BY: David Gessert INTERFACE ENGINEERING INC. Consulting Engineers 6542 S.E. Lake Road, Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 (503) 659 -6394 FAX (503) 659 -9029 July 11, 1997 Loy Taylor McDonalds Corporation 5000 Southwest Meadow, Suite 200 Lake Oswego, OR 97055 RE: MCDONALDS CORPORATION Project No. 97346 Dear Loy: The public water supplies serving the above project site were tested on Wednesday, July 9, 1997. Information as sought from National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 291 Recommended Practice for Fire Flow Testing and Marking of Hydrants, 1995 edition, figure 2 -11 "Sample hydrant flow test report" follows: Hydrant Flow Test Report Location: The pressure hydrant was located on Southwest Dartmouth Street approximately 200 feet west of the intersection with Southwest 72nd Avenue. The flow hydrant was located on t Southwest Dartmouth Street approximately 400 feet west of the intersection with Southwest 72nd Avenue. Test date: July 7, 1997. Test Time: 0930 Representative of: Tualatin Valley Water Witness: David Gessert, Interface Engineering State purpose of test: As requested by Loy Taylor of McDonalds Corporation for new restaurant at 11590 Southwest Pacific Highway ( at intersection of Southwest Pacific Highway and Southwest 72nd Avenue). Consumption rate during test: 2249 GPM No private pumps ran during test. Size nozzle: 2 x 2.5 inch d =2.5 (2 nozzles were flowed) Pitot Reading: 45 PSI p =45 Discharge coefficient: 0.90 c =0.90 Total Flow: Q= (2)((29.8)(c)(d =2249 GPM Static Pressure: 125 PSI Residual Pressure: 105 PSI Projected flow at 20 PSI = 5500 GPM 0:\97346 \COMM\97JULY. LTR Other Offices: Salem, Oregon (503) 364 -5354 Kirkland, Washington (206) 820 -1542 Loy Taylor July 11, 1997 Page 2 Remarks: Test location was approximately 2,500 feet south of subject project site. Since test location and project site are connected by a 12 inch underground main, test results are representative of the project site as adjusted for elevation. The test location is estimated to be 25 feet lower than the project site. Exact elevation differences were requested from the City of Tigard but were not available at the time of the writing of this report. Please contact me with your questions. Sincerely, slail4AS) PE David Gessert, PE Fire Protection Engineer DG /nlp c: Chris Budeski (Westech Engineering, Inc.) . 400 PROf ` 13,898 9 IP ••Led O GON 4 16, �9$SQ J. GES 6 s 9 Q:\97346\COMM\97JULY.LTR AA cP ; . I • , • . • . . •• • ! • I •-______-_- __..... ,),\O • ,. .. . ; . 1 C ' p KIT ecr 1 , 1 .04 (G. ,G.iel S 1 inr F 1 • - - - • • I — 1 : pi , . 1 r — - ' - 1 _.______ ._ 1 . . ---.- - - ... .- — _.: 1 i 9P. , i ; • • 1 1 .7-- i 1 . _ , 1 1 00004 ; . . % i a L.., > I — ----- • • , . I 1 i , , L .. ... z., z • :I. -.-• I ■ \ \ I I i \ i .• \ I i I : 1 ..., ■ I . • • I i 1 I , \ I 1 : • • \i. :.• E 4 f ' I I 1.4.1 i I > I I . . . I I i I I I • E3AYL(30 . i ! r c• I I i ! I i i 1 1 .1 r1 . . ! ■ , . . D „VALL i DlIJVALL I ST : ' I . . . MMII . . • , i , . 4 1 I : 1 1 1 1 i • 1 : i 1 , .:_______ ___. I .• : . ! 1 • ! . 1 , 1 i 111 ---. ---------G.H . i ------ cr......,-1 : . . . . CLINTONI I i , • , . , i I I I , .c i ..A FLO IA) P ------- ILasSuii ----- 7 -- — .• . • i 5 ...., 6,. Ihri 0 A An _ klYbILAsir . • i , 1-. • ________ .___ , 4 _ ... . . . , , • _____. a4 , ....•____. - . r IUN • • ■ r. • • %..— • an NI ---."11111111111111111111 ,1w. •••• • ,sin alf • I • r DARTMOI 11-/-4 i 05/23/97 13:20 '503 5853986 WESTECH ENG. + -+ MCDONALDS 21004/004 C 3/,J2 0 • - P lan Review e 5 $ , Date /� �� 7 CITY OF TIGA D OREGON Soils Special Inspections This form shall be signed by the Owner. Engineer or Architect of Record and returned to the Building Division prior to issuance of the permit Pease note that a separate structural special inspection form may be required. Project Address: // f fy -(19.., e L i 711 w Project Name: / 494 t. /J Architect of Record (Finn): Su h ti 7 i o L d G Of Ph one ) 30 -1 2-3 z e z; - Engineer of Record (Firm): . , - Phone: - LY Soils Engineer: X M L Y'l fNrl. Firm: Phone: Lot Subdivision: The following special inspections shall be performed according to the State Building Code and City of Tigard's Municipal Code Chapter 14.06.010 - 14.06.040: i4 Engineered Grading ( >5,000 cubic yards) - U.B.C. 3309.4 ❑ Regular Grading - U.S.C. 3309.8 Compaction Reports (per ASTM standards listed in U.B.C. 330.5) Testing Agencyr, G,r+.Q. 1 15: ^r — Phone: ❑ Other The owner hereby agrees to employ the above sods engineer for the above -noted special inspections. Lao 1 �.►_ i t • Signature of Owner g I Print Name 1--- Lb4 Phone No. 3 - 6P:i 4- C /334 -- Fnn AU �• Date &pl o 3 /9 7 WILIDagAVIEMOSAUSXC 3125 SW Hall Blvd, TiOord. OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 1DD (503) 684 -2772 • May 5, 1997 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Loy Taylor 5000 SW Meadows Rd. #200 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 RE: Plan Check Numbers: 5-5C. 5- 6C.5.7p. 5-8C This letter is to confimi receipt of your building plans which have been routed to the plans examiner. As a reminder, the associated land use case(s) is/are: SDR97 -0001 - McDonalds Corp. Please be aware you are responsible for satisfying the conditions of the land use case(s) - and must submit plans directly to the appropriate staff person(s) indicated on your final order. - Your building plans are not routed to the planning or engineering departments; you must satisfy the land use permit conditions independent of the building permit plans review process. - After the building plans review process has been completed, your building permit wilt not be issued without approval from the engineering and planning departments, If you have any questions regarding this notice, please feel free to telephone me and I will be happy to explain further. Bonnie Mulheam Development Services Technician cc: Building file cc: Planning Department cc: Engineering Department I:\DSTS'$UPLUC.DOT 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 C Don Maltase RECEIVED PLANNING Executive Vice President Real Estate APR 1 5 1997 S E R V I C E S Brokerage and Management CITY OF TIGARD April 14, 1997 Mr. Mark Roberts Planner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: SW Corner of SW 72nd & Highway 99 Dear Mark: Thank you very much for the time you spent with me today regarding the aforementioned property. As discussed, my concern with the potential dedication of additional land on SW 72nd was based upon a conversation with McDonald's Corporation. As we discussed, McDonald's has an agreement with the owners of the property for the corner in question. McDonald's is well into the planning process. Additionally, the owners of the property have on going negotiations with the contiguous site due west of the McDonald's portion of the property. I appreciate your comments relative to trying to envision what the various traffic patterns will look like in the years to come. It was encouraging to me to hear that you will not require but just "encourage" that McDonald's dedicates this area. Additionally it was good to hear that you will not use this potential requirement on the part of the City to slow down the McDonald's application process. I know McDonalds has spent many thousand of dollars, to date, relative to the development of this corner. It is encouraging to me that the City realizes that it is difficult at best to develop property and to change requirements at this date would cost a great many people time and money. Thanks again for your consideration in this matter. Sinc,prely, r. ( *) k/a6 q Don Maltase Broker Executive Vice President roberts414 1440 SW Taylor • Portland, OR 97205 503-224-9554 • 503-224-1267 fox , sDe 97-0951 NEWESTECH ENGINEERING, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS&PLANNERS June 25, 1997 Mr. Gene : 1 ow Tualat'. t alley.Fire & Rescue P. . ii ox 4755 'eaverton, OR 97076 RE: Proposed McDonald's Restaurant 72nd, Tigard, OR - Fire Hydrant Placement J.O.#1742.057.0 Dear Mr Renfrow: The intent of this letter is to summarize our meeting this morning regarding the placement of a fire hydrant to serve the proposed McDonald's Restaurant. As discussed, a fire hydrant will be placed on the northwest side of the entrance drive. This placement appears to meet the distance to the building requirement, as well as placement on the access. An 81/2' x 11" showing the proposed location is attached for your review. We are proceeding with revising the drawings as well as completing in field flow testing to determine the flow at the proposed hydrant. Once we have completed these items we will be forwarding a copy to your office for final review. It is our understanding the proposed restaurant will require a minimum of 1500 gpm @ 20 psi fire flow protection. If you have any questions or need any additional information regarding this matter, please contact us at (503) 585-2474. Sincerely, WESTECH ENGINEERING, INC. N--e )(7A Chris G. Budeski cgb cc: Loy Taylor, McDonald's Corporation r. Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Div. 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 3841 Fairview Industrial Dr.S.E.,Suite 100,Salem,Oregon 97302 Phone:(503)585-2474 Fax:(503)585-3986 I McDonald's Corporation 5000 S.W. Meadows Road Suite 200 rvDOnald'S Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 503/684-9334 Fax: 503/624-4105 June 30, 1997 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: McDonald's Restaurant 11590 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR. (Additional information request) Dear Mark: Enclosed you will find the following: 1) Site lighting plan by Security Lighting Systems Inc., dated 6/27/97. 2) Modified Landscape plan including the following modifications: A) Trees @ center parking area B) Additional tree @ 72nd C) Extended screen hedge @ 72nd D) Repositioned tree in conflict with pedestrian walkway E) Percentage of landscaping to leasehold Please review the above indicated information at your soonest convenience. We are very anxious for a building permit to start construction. Sincer ly, °4 ____ - Loy Taylor Project Manager McDonald's Corporation cc: Glenda Stratton, Lynn Carey \r78dev\taylor\tigrob.doc(3/31/95} 07/01/97 15:36 $503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL a 001./003 p*R ;i D E DISPOSAL COMPANY P.O. Box 820 Sherwood, OR 97140 (503)625-6177 TELEPHONE: (503) 625-6177 FAX 0 (503) 625-6179 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: 7— TO: a 01-- (c TELEPHONE; FAX NUMBER: V?54 .1(2-q7 ATTENTION: lin a-4.-k p 6. PROM: L �r WE ARE SENDING 3 PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) . IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THESE PAGES, PLEASE CALL US AS SOON A POSSIBLE. THANK YOU p d I�- / 5/°v s a- fc,Jr, (:)-C ecyli, 5 wu if ez,5 6-4:")fra a' 7 6:3) Printed on 100% recycled over. 07/01/97 15:36 234503 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL ZO02/003 7-01-1997 2=29PM 1=Rte' P. 1 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Lenny Hing Company: Pride Disposal Phone: 625-6177 Fax: 625-6179 From: Loy Taylor Company: McDonald`s Corporation Phone: 503-684-9334 Pax: 503-684-0163 Date: 07/01/97 Pages including this cover page: 2 Comments: Tigard 72nd Trash Enclosure modifications • Lenny, Enclosed, please find modification to our trash enclosure, per our phone conversation. Thanks, Loy Taylor 07/01/97 15:36 '$505 625 6179 PRIDE DISPOSAL IJ003/003 7--01-1997 2 i 3OPM FROM �"z ■ .ozz. .09 „ere or AL 5 • 0 x .ON'1 113 •o / 7 \ Bench Mork N . 237 gE . / ._ Brass Disk in r:1rr ' Elev.- 2'.5.o \ 1 '� -- „ .__---_T ,.p. Keystone {� i� = \ � \(2 20' / Ret ornin< 6 ��.1 7-" ‘,-v. d PR DSEb 1 e ,�� V" r=`L �t - ,� WIDE /L EA ' M E ' T �` ,. , vt. :,.... \ii 0 _fC t�T $ I �' ■ ° ' _ _- --4--1-----"% 44,R _ 1 B ‘ .e 4°' . . .c keel / St Ei • - 2r 14 , � • 4..) ‘ . - • , ,,li ' - r 0 - ' -- - ' .., .. , . . ;00.-- ..,..‘,....- • . ,,,, , ,„••.....- op. 417 , - jo„ :: ... Ne2., i g6 `, . � 6 2 \� .1 II 11111 a i / l t \ 0 • e. ./. IlleVilli.›: / ‘ :-...M1'}' -)3 - . . t lt 1 - • . ../rie de.: ' X' 4.401, 0 _ . � Iii a N . I McDONALD'S CORPC.,04TION 5000 SW Meadows, Suite 200 Lake Oswego OR 97035 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: '1-.4-D - TO: 7y-kri/ 0)e4ein PHONE: / 6t1 FAX: lOU-( FROM PHONE: 503-684-9334 cDonatd's C r . FAX: 503-684-0163 �hh RE: pages inciudin Number of pa9 9 cover sheet: Message h� 36-02c0 f4'J-ei'l'‘J?"`f r.esp4(160 ito Afp(OU R78DEV\CAREY'PERM\FAXBLNK (413197) 1 d 1/1O21A WdLS:6 L66I-ZO-L To: Glenda Stratton From: Bill Blanco July 1, 1997 RE: Tigard, Oregon Pacific Highway L/C: 036-0260 Attached is a rough draft of the Walkway Easement Agreement. It you approve. l will make a clean draft and have it executed. d WOd.d WvL5=6 L661-ZO-L City,State: TIGARD,OREGON Address: Nat Highway 98&72nd L/C: 036-0260 WALKWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS WALKWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT. dated JULY 1, 1997, is between THE STEWART TRUST, PHYLLIS STEWART, DONATA STEWART AND NATHAN COHEN, Trustees as to an undivided 3/8th interest and PHYLLIS T. STEWART as to an undivided 5/8th interest (the "Landlord Grantor"), MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, (the"Tenant Grantor')and the CITY OF TIGARD (the"Grantee"). WHEREAS, Landlord Grantor is the owner of the property described on Exhibit A, attached ("Parcel 1") which parcel of land has been leased to Tenant Grantor under Ground Lease Agreement dated December 26, 1996 (the "Lease") by and between Landlord Grantor, as landlord, and Tenant Grantor, as tenant;and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard desires that in connection with Tenant's development on Parcel 1, that the Landlord Grantor and Tenant Grantor agree to convey to the Grantee a certain Walkway easement over upon and across a part of Parcel 1 described as Parcel 18 on Exhibit B attached hereto;and WHEREAS, Landlord Grantor and Tenant Grantor desire to convey to Grantee a certain Walkway easement over, upon and across Parcel 1B in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained in this Easement Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, the following grants, agreements, covenants and restrictions are made: 1. Landlord Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City of Tigard in the state of Oregon a perpetual non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, maintenance and repair of a certain pedestrian walkway for pedestrian ingress and egress over, upon and across a parcel of land described as Parcel 1B on the attached Exhibit B. 2. Tenant Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City of Tigard in the state of Oregon a non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, maintenance and repair of a certain pedestrian walkway for pedestrian ingress and egress over, upon and across a parcel of land described as Parcel 1B on the attached Exhibit B, for the duration of the Tenant Grantor's Lease and any extension thereof. 1 Grantee agrees to keep Parcel 18 in good condition and repair at its sole cost. During the course of repairing and/or maintaining Parcel 18. Grantee shall perform the construction, repair and maintenance of sidewalk installations In such a manner L JKLEC.0urocaoces+eawwco+wucw.d.00c d HOa.d 141d89'6 L661—ZO—L • so as to not unduly disrupt the operation of the business on Parcel 1. Further, Grantee agrees to restore Parcel 1B, after any maintenance and repair work, to the same condition which existed prior to the commencement of any such work. 4 Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Landlord Grantor and Tenant Grantor harmless against any and all claims, liability and costs (including, but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) for any and all injuries to persons and for any and all damage to property occurring as a result of Grantee's failure to safely and property maintain the Parcel 1B in good condition and repair. 5. Except as to the rights herein granted, Grantor shall have the tull use and control of Parcel 1. 6. This Easement Agreement shall inure to and be for the benefit of Landlord Grantor, Tenant Grantor and Grantee, and their successors and assigns. TO INDICATE THEIR CONSENT TO THIS WALKWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT, the parties hereto, or their authorized officers or representatives, have signed this agreement as of the date first above written. LANDLORD GRANTOR: TENANT GRANTOR THE STEWART TRUST, Phyllis Stewart, MCDONALD'S CORPORA SCION,a Delaware Donate Stewart and Nathan Cohen, corporation Trustees as to an undivided 3/8th interest and PHYLLIS T. STEWART as to an undivided 5/8th interest By: Phyllis Stewart, Trustee Its: Donata Stewart,Trustee GRANTEE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, a Municipal corporation Nathan Cohen, Trustee By. Phyllis T.Stewart its: (Attach Acknowledgment of Signatures and Exhibit A and Et) Exhibit A: legal description of the Parcel 1 Exhibit B: legal description of the Walkway easement parcel (Parcel 18) L:1R ELEOA LIWORO DOCSI8B LANCOI W LKWAY.DOC L w6 LiGai.vwORODOC9kBeLancv'W WAY DOc d Wb85:6 L661-ZO-L Reppeto & Associate: Land Surveyors West lawn 8uildinq. Sts. 202 Phone t Fax 1225 N.W. Murray Rd_ (503)e43 1755 Portland, OR 27229 REGi9TERQD PROFESSIONAL September 24, 1996 LAND SURVEYOR Revised January 2. 1997 ,! , / Jab No. 96034 5 � 1, S .W. 72nd Ave. & Hwy. 99 McDonald's Corporation O e E G°m STEVEN P.BUCALES LEGAL DESCRIPTION mt PARCEL 1 (main Site) Lease Area A tract of land situated in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 36, T. 1 S. , R. 1W. , W.M. , City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence, along the east line of said Richardson Claim, South 1 943'56" West, 777.31 feet; thence, North 88°16'04" West, 80.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning, said point being at an angle point on the southerly right of way line of S.W. Pacific Highway (State Highway No. 99W) 88.00 feet opposite Highway centerline Station 24+13 .60 as described in fee no. 96- 43544, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said southerly right of way line, at right angles to said Highway centerline, South 34°33'07• East, 45.43 feet to an angle point in said Highway right of way line, and as described in fee no. 86-51674, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said right of way line, along the arc of a 1462 .40 foot radius curve to the left. through a central angle of 0'03'26° (chord bears North 57 4138'10' East, 1.46 feet) a distance of 1.46 feet to a point on the west right of way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue as described in fee no. 94-13956, , Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said west right of way line, South 9'16'31" East, 49.03 feet; thence, leaving said right of way line, and running along the proposed right of way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue, along the arc of a non-tangent 310.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 8.20'31" (chord bears South 2°26'20' East, 45.09 feet) a distance of 45.13 feet; thence, parallel with the centerline of S.W. 72nd Ave. , being 40.00 feet from centerline (when measured at right angles) South 1°43' 56" West. 101.83 feet; thence, North 88°17'21" West, 26.75 feet; thence, South 59•S2'27* West, 61.33 feet: thence, along the arc of A 50 .00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of. 35'52'33' (chord bears South 41•56'10" Kest. 30.80 feet) a distance of 31.31 feet; thence, along the arc of a 41.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 213°47'45° i L3I2 A 3'`V' S d W02id WV65=6 L66 1—ZO—L (chord bears North 49°06' 14" West, .78 .46 feet) a distance of 152 .99 feet; thence, N ' 9°59' 35" West, 40.20 feet hence. along the arc of a 50.50 .t radius curve to the right. _though a central angle of l7°35 '36" (chord bears North 1°11' 47" west, 15 .45 feet) a distance of 15 .51 feet; thence, North 7°36'O1." East, 23 .35 feet; thence, along the arc of a 49.50- Foot radius curve tb the left through a central angle of 17.35'36' (chord Dear:; North 1.11°47' West, 15.14 feet) a distance of 15 .20 feet; thence. North 9°59' 3S" west, 62 .39 feet to a point on the southerly right of way line of said 5_W. pacific Highway; thence, along said southerly right of way line, North 60°54'07" Last, 161.69 feet to the True Point of ' Beginning_ contains 39, 885 square feet. p ROVl3SIONAL LAN) SURVEYOR opiECIQ STEVEN P.RUCKUS m, EMIISIT it (continued) TO COVRIAJT NOT TO CCIIEPs'!E 9 "d WOdd Wd65=6 L661-ZO-L ,eppeto & Associates Land Surveyors Westlawn Building- Ste. 202 Phone/ Fax 1225 NM. Murray Rd. (503)643-8755 Portland. OR 97229 �: Gts1eRED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR June 26, 1997 ! ' Job No. 96034 S.W. 72nd Ave . & Hwy. 99, Tigard, OR OREG°N McDonald' s Corporation STEVEN P. BUCKLES / 'tL / rte, "'€. /� LEGAL DESCRIPTION walkway Easement (McDonald's Parcel and to west edge of Ingress-Egress Easement) A tract of land situated in the S.B. 1/4 of Section 36, T. 1 S. , R. 1W. , W.M. , City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the northeast corner of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence, along the east line of said . Richardson Claim, South 1°43 '56" West, 777 .31 feet; thence, North 88°16 ' 04" West, 80 .74 feet to a point being at an angle point on the southerly right of way line of S.W. Pacific Highway (State Highway No. 99W) 88 .00 feet opposite Highway centeline Station 244-13 .60 as described in fee no. 96-43544, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said southerly right of way line, at right angles to said Highway centerline, South 34°33'07" East, 45 .43 feet to an angle point in said Highway right of way line, and as described in fee no. 86-51674, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said right of way line, along the arc of a 1462 .40 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 0°03 '26" (chord bears North 57°38 ' 10" East, 1 .46 feet) a distance of 1.46 feet to a point on the west right of way line of S .W. 72nd Avenue as described in fee no. 94-13956, Washington County :Deed Records; thence, along said west right of way line, South 9"16' 31" East, 49.03 feet; thence, leaving said right of way line, and running along the proposed right of way line of S .W. 72nd Avenue, along the arc of a non-tangent 310.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 8°20 '31" (chord bears South 2°26 ' 20" East, 45 .09 feet) a distance of 45 .13 feet; thence, parallel with the centerline of S.W. 72nd Ave. , being 40.00 feet from centerline (when measured at right angles) South 1°43 '56" West, 78 .83 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence, continuing along said proposed right of way line, South 1°43 ' 56" west, 5 .00 feet; thence, North 88°17'21" West, 9 .78 feet; thence, along the arc of a 31 .00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 31°50' 12" eX64 13/7- L VOdd 1A1v00:01 L661-ZO-L (chord bears South 47' 33" west, 17 . 00 feet) a d-_1.ance of 17 .23 feet; thence, South 59°52 ' 27" West, 74 .35 feet; thence, along the arc of a 45 .00 foot radius curve to the left thro...gh a central angle of 39°39 ' 45" (chord bears South 40°02 '34" West, 30 .53 feet) a distance of 31 .15 feet; thence, along the arc of a 30 .00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 119°44 ' 23" (chord bears South 80°04' 54" West, 51.89 feet) a distance of 62 .70 feet; thence, North 88°17'40" West, 31.00 feet; thence, along the arc of a 57 .00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 5°16 ' 58" (chord bears North 16°10' 14" West, 5 .25 feet) a distance of 5 .26 feet; thence, South 88°17 '40" :East, 34 .98 feet; thence, along the arc of a 25.00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 124°41' 13" (chord bears North 82°33 ' 18" East. 44 .29 feet) a distance of 54 .40 feet; thence, along the arc of a 50.00 foot radius curve to the right through a ,central angle of 39°39' 45" (chord bears North 40°02' 34" East, 33 .93 feet) a distance of 34 . 61 feet; thence, North 59°52 '27" East, 74 .35 feet; thence. along the arc of a 36 .00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 31°50' 12" (chord bears North 75°47 ' 33" East, 19 .75 feet) a distance of 20.00 feet; thence, South 88°17' 21" East, 9 .79 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Contains 1, 136 square feet . /7‘•e- --Q641";`&‘ exibtc.t4 it, REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR OREGON 336 JULY 17,STEVEN P.BUCKLES ' 31 M9603.0m,.b0 8 d WObd 11VOO.0t L661-ZO-L 7-07-1997 11 :04AM FROM P. 2 • - / / ND..F C s S SC,.aBy°,R g;,ateoo ------ / +I{ a 07 't lr // / / tom. / / / / ,\` .� 8.neA Nark No. 237 1� • / ,� 8r°ss Cisk !n Cwb c / 24W•a ,,, Elev..766.00 ' .1'• R I pl �• PF /V.' (se•not.no. I) 1 P`//t aY � `�d. ��f' /►/ra'a� .] _ J- fw.,,n \ 3 .� (.7•faarce wa' %J.'''. Ye lone / �(, * Na a •rinr CI •/• �����/ t 1_4,4 =Rttor •'nQ WOY 6 xJw \ ..7, ':�N V_ \G / �f` n,. Lf I o4O�/X168//�/ �.-.. , • ' 1 n \ A�G��i Apo ,ann5ade4o� /d ,1 i ti// // / \J- J�1 1M o WC 2' ry w I II S� `/ �oL t�l� sY / / / 1J1/ / sfa' \SJ'W r�_+1 •°�■ ' As9 rta�nc t°°` //��/ 60E// / / S a3-. 6r SA•/ C,C' ra.,a / / / /// V/.• /ma> EOlt.p14(}.RE.�O.' :1 i.ua 7"re, 0.103'26• I I lI. "VW/0.1 / ^._. .1 SE 1.5 j?•1. .. R= 1462.40 t ......,V,N.a ///////' '.0.• /_ 9.‘03.-4 EAa 00.E 1 X40. (2 �I 1 1 „L.c. 1+6 i :r r//// p 5��/ 0.. 0 .k35k t ? / +_ 1 l I it ce•N 57•3e•10•` I rs.nrc ,$3'V/ li t4.b>6 y�-00, 96n'4 h.. - 1 I I ,,,� e 1 I -a / / r / itt f° '0 Wof.rlin - -'staw , /i r / / % ,910 L� �i'�'1 ro'v o/'i 1n.. as.as 1 I y i i A'S 0:t4tral P' N,c ` /l A. •Co //�''• ,....1.. 0,0;a4 ,°o /1 aN. N(io vj,,,"a- -- / a ..6 L. s, na., an •tw.a .I ' n1 4 rus. f //// � ••�'y,�g.�/pOPe' „`'' / n , \_____--268 -J IIIC;� i %/"j a /„ 1 to 1\ •1e Miiet.i.d rlL.(2 `,,',,,.// GL / w1.�t.Z`fr.m.. _-\\ !1 I 24.1 40 ' . 'O \ K vim` 1 l-„el..."LO��.j.`?6• ♦ _ I tO I „.,../ /.7. '4Z/ .\ a•c. L• - - lm � f JNN i�ti..�l(rT'� - O O/ . `-s- *m.• --3w-s `��; mat 1 lg." y ' j.l5 Y i� - 26c1-- 1 1 .:.:1 s N. - --- •- / 11 <� •� net- --_ rw.r >�a< - �� --- ,w.J . ---261- ► piss l"'. •`-'Lei `\ \---- PARCEL 1- / 1lr < `� �\ *s%ate �-+ -Ater) 39.885 Sq.Ft... `'r 1' Z • 11 u '.S� ```-4 S.6` ...J ` - n,,r s. 0.915 Acrres _- 1 ! j- . -.259---4_. 1v- s ` If, . - - ?s8- _-emu'---- pull,!{+ , ,J,. �� .� �- -... . - -•nt., r '� t�.5 ss�. \ .......C.) -25. _. _ _ _ '_?_. -227=- � 1 y*Z __ 5-,--}... r 11 s ro,v ...\h .-�,3i.•r •N , �___ -256.- _-----��►s,l' J(' G Ii 1��_ _~ssa.e- G0ih ;,at.4 754-_-_ f.r.o.e -� ' 1 . . * _ _ rAU(rcA.r FSN7. f// 'Lill E ^•0-,41 •,a..4 s- ►r �. T0.00 9: �3b1r a4•i a.n r N 80401,53 L- 17. _-// X 4650 �0.. �~�_ 1�'-251 0 _.. _h. W m ii 250 j E I, N 88•17'21'W ''-.1.'-1-1,34 2uT� ,,62.' .SI/ 7a ^4•i rw.tP�7.5. . l r.a.0 % nn `� -`249• 1�1j4 °s0 °o; - i, S{ • `� /I Vol -1011-4;•-•-- --."4.i----''' �'1,` �,.r.JJ Raj ng ziR/ Nn �_._� ~24- f41 S 59.:-/S. 9 \yS I 'are„ trop; g X24 '/� ,�p"�6 aE5`'- t4u.-_I7.7S : i ,.,.. c�'^ �,6 EC 7 CS N 88•17'721714.: f Cr H •r.a.a �r7i.r��6� 5'Erlt 1 _ 0.sa ..•>.4" „,Gi SE9.g17f t e.,o.& . vl -�` - .. 4` 1 1ry_ 1�.246 F.a.m.nt 11 f 111 /' `� / 20 0 \ 34.98% �� ■e'0 b• y-y. 245 .a. ,yi ?4¢ 20 rt. Street O.d'eof•on 0I W ��i, STORM DRMI4ACF- g:,'; \ �:47'414.►..A:�1 7020: ?4J / CASEMENT POND °) \ \. / L14 4 444.. :, 3 It 1 *11-111 ✓ ()yea ea •eIMQttit— Veech e4+-": 4 66 14+- 5.4 0 ti eek la ro v fa#� f �o� 6E- v'e Ca f''`� I 141,19..12. - �I_1/R 7 City, State: TIGARD, OREGON Address: Pacific Highway 99 & 72nd L/C: 036-0260 WALKWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS WALKWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT, dated July 1, 1997, is between THE STEWART TRUST, PHYLLIS STEWART, DONATA STEWART AND NATHAN COHEN, Trustees as to an undivided 3/8th interest and PHYLLIS T. STEWART as to an undivided 5/8th interest (the "Landlord Grantor), MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Tenant Grantor") and the CITY OF TIGARD (the "Grantee"). WHEREAS, Landlord Grantor is the owner of the property described on Exhibit A, attached ("Parcel 1") which parcel of land has been leased to Tenant Grantor under Ground Lease Agreement dated December 26, 1996 (the "Lease") by and between Landlord Grantor, as landlord, and Tenant Grantor, as tenant; and WHEREAS, the City of Tigard desires that in connection with Tenant's development on Parcel 1, that the Landlord Grantor and Tenant Grantor agree to convey to the Grantee a certain Walkway easement over upon and across a part of Parcel 1 described as Parcel 1B on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Landlord Grantor and Tenant Grantor desire to convey to Grantee a certain Walkway easement over, upon and across Parcel 1B in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained in this Walkway Easement Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, the following grants, agreements, covenants and restrictions are made: 1. Landlord Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City of Tigard in the state of Oregon a perpetual non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, maintenance and repair of a certain pedestrian walkway for pedestrian ingress and egress over, upon and across a parcel of land described as Parcel 1B on the attached Exhibit B. 2. Tenant Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City of Tigard in the state of Oregon a non-exclusive easement for the construction, operation, maintenance and repair of a certain pedestrian walkway for pedestrian ingress and egress over, upon and across a parcel of land described as Parcel 1B on the attached Exhibit B, for the duration of the Tenant Grantor's Lease and any extension thereof. 3. Grantee agrees to keep Parcel 1B in good condition and repair at its sole cost. During the course of repairing and/or maintaining Parcel 1 B, Grantee shall perform the construction, repair and maintenance of sidewalk installations in such a manner so as to not unduly disrupt the operation of the business on Parcel 1. Further, L'RELEGALWORDDOCSW YACCARO\PORTLANN036-o2601WLKWAY DOC Grantee agrees to restore Parcel 1B, after any maintenance and repair work, to the same condition which existed prior to the commencement of any such work. 4. Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Landlord Grantor and Tenant Grantor harmless against any and all claims, liability and costs (including, but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs) for any and all injuries to persons and for any and all damage to property occurring as a result of Grantee's failure to safely and properly maintain the Parcel 1B in good condition and repair. 5. Except as to the rights herein granted, Tenant Grantor shall have the full use and control of Parcel 1. 6. This Easement Agreement shall inure to and be for the benefit of Landlord Grantor, Tenant Grantor and Grantee, and their successors and assigns. TO INDICATE THEIR CONSENT TO THIS WALKWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT, the parties hereto, or their authorized officers or representatives, have signed this agreement as of the date first above written. LANDLORD GRANTOR: TENANT GRANTOR THE STEWART TRUST, Phyllis Stewart, Donata McDONALD'S CORPORATION : are Stewart and Nathan Cohen, Trustees as to corporation • ,r--.• an undivided 3/8th interest and PHYLLIS T. z, STEWART as to an undivided 5/8th interest By: pub .J Phyllis Stewart, Trustee Its: De.a l4�t=4.' Donata Stewart, Trustee GRANTEE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, a Municipal corporation Nathan Cohen,Cohen, Trustee By: • Its: ALL- AMMASTItrusi -4-- Phyllis T. Stewart (Attach Acknowledgment of Signatures and Exhibit A and B) Exhibit A: legal description of the Parcel 1 Exhibit B: legal description of the Walkway easement parcel (Parcel 1 B) L;RELEGAL\W O RD DOCSW VACCARO\POR TLAND\036-02601W LKWAY.DOC ACKNOWLEDGMENT - McDONALD'S (No attestation required) STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS: COUNTY OF DUPAGE ) I, JoAnne L. Zieman, a Notary Public in and for the county and state aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that Catherine A. Griffin, Department Director of McDonald's Corporation, a Delaware corporation, who is personally known to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such authorized party appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that he signed, sealed and delivered the said instrument as his free and voluntary act as such authorized party and as the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein set forth. Given under my hand and notarial seal, this 7th day of July, 1997. 1.12414(1A...)' My commission expires March 18, 2001. Notary P lic JoAnne L. eman OFFICIAL SEAL JOANNE L ZIEMAN NOTARY PUBLIC.STATE OF ILLINOIS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:03/19/01 ACKNOWLEDGME T - CORPORATE STATE OF ri/e G Gr7U ) ) SS: COUNTY Q5 l . n / I. 47.ti At-c{-1 , a Notary Pub is in and for the county and state aforesaid'DO H REBY CERTIFY that .127 L/bg and of ..a_ , a(n) t 1 J,71. p corporation, who are personall kn• n to we to be the .'-rsons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such authorized parties, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that they signed, sealed and delivered the said instrument as their free and voluntary act as such authorized parties and as the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein set forth. Given under my hand and notarial seal, this 1(G' day of 0,11 p , 19 C/7 . { f_!✓� 4. f, }, � My commission expires /0-9-�� . Notary Public OFFICIAL SEAL TRUDY A TROUT .iNOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.058391 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCTOBER'S.2 XY City, State: TIGARD, OREGON L/C: 036-0260 Exhibit A Legal Description PARCEL i (Main Sice) Lease Area A tract of land situated in the S.E. 1/4 of Section 36, T. 1 S. , R. 1W. , W.M. , City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: . Commencing at the northeast corner of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence, along the east line of said Richardson Claim, South 1°43 '56" West, 777.31 feet; thence, North 88'16'04" West, 80.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning, said point being at an angle point on the southerly right of way line of S .W. Pacific Highway (State Highway No. 99W) 88.00 feet opposite Highway centerline Station 24.13 .60 as described in fee no. 96- 43544, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said southerly right of way line, at right angles to said Highway centerline, South 34°33'07" East, 45.43 feet to an angle point in said Highway right of way line, and as described in fee ao. 86-51674, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said right of way line, along the arc of a 1462.40 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 0°03'26" (chord bears North 57•38'10" East, 1.46 feet) a distance of 1.46 feet to a point on the west right of way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue as described in fee no. 94-13956, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said west right of way line, South 9°16'31' East, 49.03 feet; thence, leaving said right of way line, and running along the proposed right of way line of S.W. 72nd Avenue, along the arc of a non-tangent 310.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 8°20'31" (chord bears South 2°26'20" East, 45.09 feet) a distance of 45.13 feet; thence, parallel with the centerline of 3.W. 72nd Ave., being 40.00 feet from centerline (when measured at right angles) South . 1°43 ' 56" West, 101.83 feet; thence, North 88 017'21' West, 26.75 feet; thence, South 59°52'27' West, 61.33 feet; thence, along the arc of 50.00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of. 35°52'33" (chord bears South 41 656'10" West, 30.80 feet) a distance of 31.31 feet; thence, along the arc of a 41.00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 213'47'45" (chord tears North 49°06' 14" West, 78 .46 feet) a distance of 152 .99 feet; thence, North 9°59' 35" Wesc. 40 .20 feet; thence, along the arc of a 50 . 50 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 17'35' 36" (chord bears North 1°11' 47" West, 15 .45 feet) a distance of 15 .51 feet; thence, North 7°36'01" East, 23 .35 feet; thence, along the arc of a 49.50- foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 17°35' 36" (chord bears North 1°11147" West, 15 .14 feet) a distance of 15.20 feet; thence, North 9 659' 35" West, 62 .39 feet to a point on the southerly right of way line of said S .W. 2acific Highway; thence, along said southerly right of way line, North 60°54'07" East, 161.69 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Contains 39, 885 square feet. Exhibit A City, State: TIGARD, OREGON L/C: 036-0260 Exhibit B Legal Description PARCEL 1B • Walkway Easement (McDonald' s Parcel and to west edge of Ingress-Egress Easement) A tract of land situated in the S .E. 1/4 of Section 36, T. 1 S . , R. 1W. , W.M. , City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the northeast corner of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55 ; thence, along the east line of said Richardson Claim, South 1°43 ' 56" West, 777 . 31 feet; thence, North 88°16 ' 04" West, 80 . 74 feet to a point being at an angle point on the southerly right of way line of S .W. Pacific Highway (State Highway No. 99W) 88 .00 feet opposite Highway centerline Station 24+13 . 60 as described in fee no. 96-43544,' Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said southerly right of way line, at right angles to said Highway centerline, South 34°33 ' 07" East, 45 .43 feet to an angle point in said Highway right of way line, and as described in fee no. 86-51674, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said right of way line, along the arc of a 1462 .40 foot radius curve to the left, through a central angle of 0°03 ' 26" (chord bears North 57°38 ' 10" East, 1 .46 feet) a distance of 1 .46 feet to a point on the west right of way line of S .W. 72nd Avenue as described in fee no. 94-13956, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said west right of way line, South 9°16 ' 31" East, 49 .03 feet; thence, leaving said right of way line, and running along the proposed right of way line of S .W. 72nd Avenue, along the arc of a non-tangent 310 .00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 8°20 ' 31" (chord bears South 2°26 ' 20" East, 45 . 09 feet) a distance of 45 .13 feet; thence, parallel with the centerline of S .W. 72nd Ave . , being 40 .00 feet from centerline (when measured at right angles) South 1°43 ' 56" West, 78 . 83 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence, continuing along said proposed right of way line, South 1°43 ' 56" West, 5 . 00 feet; thence, North 88°17 ' 21" West, 9 .78 feet; thence, along the arc of a 31 . 00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 31°50 ' 12" Exhibit B (chord bears South °47 ' 33" West, 17 .00 feet) distance of 17 . 23 feet ; thence, South 59°52 ' 27" West, 74 . 35 feet ; thence, along the arc of a 45 . 00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 39°39 ' 45" (chord bears South 40°02 ' 34" West, 30 . 53 feet) a distance of 31 . 15 feet; thence, along the arc of a 30 . 00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 119°44 ' 23" (chord bears South 80°04 ' 54" West, 51 . 89 feet) a distance of 62 . 70 feet; thence, North 88°17 ' 40" West, 31 . 00 feet; thence, along the arc of a 57 .00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 5°16 ' 58" (chord bears North 16°10 ' 14" West, 5 . 25 feet) a distance of 5 . 26 feet; thence, South 88°17 ' 40" East, 34 . 98 feet; thence, along the arc of a 25 . 00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 124°41 ' 13" (chord bears North 82°33 ' 18" East, 44 . 29 feet) a distance of 54 .40 feet; thence, along the arc of a 50 . 00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 39°39 ' 45" (chord bears North 40°02 ' 34" East, 33 . 93 feet) a distance of 34 . 61 feet; thence, North 59°52 ' 27" East, 74 . 35 feet; thence, along the arc of a 36 . 00 foot radius curve to the right through a central angle of 31°50 ' 12" (chord bears North 75°47 ' 33" East, 19 . 75 feet) a distance of 20 .00 feet; thence, South 88°17 ' 21" East, 9 . 79 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Contains 1, 136 square feet . The location of the Walkway Easement Parcel is depicted on the attached sketch as the cross hatched area. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR "1- .. / 1 ,,...../44..._ OREGON JULY 17. 198A STEVEN P.BUCKLES 2231 1/4493034W1 LO EXHIBIT B (Continued) _ / •L. t..... C...q• s.e�rtf.w�� / / {:X V 04 V ''S ,./.77014. 4 4 . V)1°>0::uA4 ,i-4(47 \'‘'''%'7.•.. 7 / N �' / zz,V ~II Ns. ?J7 t^ • I .j a *tore ' '� its - r,I.wart w.. t1 1 i / /" /a04 waww AO ..,..., a� wt wagn I /• o` • / \.I"•n " . IMI // 9 1 " t I t ° ' s }� 'M."4 2.161p tiro / �y/'c\ / ,ww•. 1L ♦ /1 / / `-- V 1KA r l•M■ '�UU _,.c / 40■401 01 . 7 83. ♦r//♦'// ct� It{ V 010't tit. 11 �1 1 R.ids•.o '' 1 a" _e /♦♦6th 645oft/,,y'(,0 .16. ' 1 ( / ... 1 c. la tl 1 wane �+e�7r//♦:L/�/�j L G�0 ' . /'\ —— _i 1 1 1 + / C!.N!7'JI.tO i 1 I ♦♦ ♦ ♦ .jA� ,1 vo • ,�/i'/ wit .r.- l 1 I '•t .' • ' \ I a..-- --:. • i 4 w.. ••• N waw '/� 1 •t lr` \_----- 268'-.J I Ito. 1 1• S. A\ t.N.0%`1{ _==. y -- --_ - . - --'ril.( 11 s1 --I6.31- - -- I v.4.., ..e..JlJV�•�1 - _ -O —el r/' .` �N -` .` ��a—_ - .w.i --261_ .y. war i a . -,. •r;,: "' PARCEL r -____ !• t :-' I Li S. rr'a- ` �-� `-Argos J9.883 S4It.... - //:/ ` � W ' +�` -o� �$��,.... 15,__ --159-- _r./,r- S.■ ```'-�� `_` -- -`— — - • —... •wr.f _—�11r t.--__ �li/,/J• a•aw itw,.rR I _ ) ttl a-a,� �'` —`, •w.,-V"'•,--_-___ ----1`56-�____ �•AD `,"I ='4 ,;A:.... --- •W.r ` �.•�— •fM.J "' -1S t 4 1 l I 1.4 C:."6 ......___"a n` •wr.• .———_ •atrrar fur.- _// Vl a-01ef� •wr r{_-153 _ -Zt .00 f• „a,/ t`"u• 1 A'i 151-—_ r% in —; fP. "'" I o , r—ALSO` =; `may —1s, y5 ; I �- ^�"- / N I Y\ e• J e ` '�—250...---,11 t. �� r_ed.,'—ii w -,.I ! I ` )� *AU. I I w.T�_ .41,, CAA. .71.`.r• w 74 • .... (r, sl ��•�� 1`� �--'1i9-* 511: 1:..4 GL_• r. o i�rl I I »•.w P '8 V r• --.2.1.: L gq. �3 "i al l I o{ v! N ••.a, �,�..� ; / t�•+{1 e";'/GS N tl•17'll r/✓q I I ` �•Iti i .v�`r t 0 if` ct..07.1.Is. II t- .Y 4. • �a /∎ ` \� —246 .° •fir ��` �r v 1, 1 * 20 /t. Street J..xetiee ;I I W \ • ` 44Nuj Aye /24J / sro/w au.r,cr - S` °O:: I /J -ii.-7°2 St rtN rzei PoNo v■� e' \ ? • e' t.S(14CNr a \ •,.•M'I•'r moo q i. : PARCEL 1B . 140'40 October 2, 1997 � -��- CITY OF TIGARD OREGON Loy Taylor McDonald's Corporation 5000 SW Meadows Road, Suite 200 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Re: Minor Modification to Add A Wildlife Habitat Dear Loy: This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification approval to add plantings to the water treatment facility within the developing McDonald's Restaurant site at 99W and SW 72nd Avenue. The Director finds that the type of revisions that are planned do not invoke any of the Major Modification criteria set forth in Section 18.120.070, therefore, the revision is found to be a Minor Modification to the original approved plan for the site. The Director finds that the proposed revision does not conflict with any of the applicable approval criteria as set forth within the Community Development Code and, therefore, approves this request as submitted. To avoid delays please submit a copy of this letter with any related permit requests. Also, please feel free to contact me concerning this information if you have any questions. Sincerely, ' 7/4-1V4 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP i:\curpin\markr\mcdon.doc c: SDR 97-0001 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 McDonald's Corporation 5000 S . Meadows Road Suite 200 �n81 Lake Oswego,Oregon 97035 503/684-9334 111® Fax:503/624-4105 RECEIVED S E P 2 5 1997 September 25, 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Mark Roberts Community Development City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR. 97223 RE: Addition of a Wildlife Habitat Dear Mark, McDonald's is pleased to announce the formation of a partnership alliance with The National Wildlife Federation, through our Environmental Affairs Department. We have agreed to participate in the development of a "Back Yard Habitat". This habitat will provide an urban setting to accommodate local bird and animal wildlife. The habitat is made up of native plants and grasses, imitating a natural setting for the wildlife. This habitat will be great addition to McDonald's, and the City of Tigard. This habitat will be developed according to National Wildlife Federation specifications. The local person, which is our contact with the Wildlife Federation, is Beth Stout. She is the Educational Outreach Coordinator, with the Western Natural Resource Center, located in Portland, Oregon. Beth would be happy to answer any questions that the City of Tigard would have concerning this program. We have invited Tigard High School and Tualatin High School to participate in this program. These two schools have acknowledge an interest in this program, and meetings have been set for Tuesday September 30, 1997, at our Regional Office, in Lake Oswego. There is grant money available to help in the development of these habitats. tigardhabitat.doc(09/25/97) Page 2 McDonald's Enclosed you will find our modified landscape and irrigation plans, which include the Wildlife Habitat. Please review and approve this modification at your soonest convenience. We will be ready to start on this project, shortly. Thank-you in advance for your cooperation. Please feel free to call me with any questions. Sine ely, Loy Taylor, Construction Project Manager C: Jim Atwell Connelly Woody Glenda Stratton tigardhabitat.doc(09/25/97) RETRUN RECORDED DOCtJi\ f TO: STATE OF OREGON ) SS CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTMENT, ' County of Washington 25 CITY OF TIGARD I, Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assess- 131.5 SW Hall Blvd. ment and Taxation and Ex-Officio County Tigard,OR 97223 Clerk for said county,do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records of said county. .\\cou.steeri. File No. SDR 97-0001 Jerry R. Hanson, Director of Assessment and Taxation,Ex- Officio County Clerk Doc : 97092800 33. 00 Rect: 195388 10/03/1997 09: 25: 46arn DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES The Stewart Trust, Phyllis Stewart, Donata Stewart, and Nathan Cohen, Trustees aDd Phyllis Stewart as an individual does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street, road,and utility purposes on,over,across, under, along, and within the following described real propety in Washington County,Oregon:, Attached Exhibit "A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand on this 24 day of June , 19 97 -- SEE ATTACHED SIGNATURE-PAGE -- Signature Signature • • Tax Statement Mailing. Address Mailing Address STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of Washington ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on (date)by: (name of person(s)). — Notary's Signature My Commission Expires: -ck v Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 12 day of, s• }-- 19,9 7 (� P City Engineer _ ._ 1`ENGPUa-FOR.\tIROWDE•IN DOT 1 J� Q� 1 RETRLN RECORDED DOCt.'1E.1 • CITY HALL RECORDS DEPARTNIF. . CITY OF TICARD 13125 SW Hall SI%d. Tigard.OR 97:13 Fil:Nu. SDR 97-0001 DEDICATION DEED FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES The Stewart Trust, Phyllis Stewart, Donata Stewart, and Nathan Cohen, Trustees and Phyllis Stewart, as an individual does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for sweet, road,and utility purposes on,over, across, under, along. and within the following described real properties in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described :ad dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in tee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and lezal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing an the property. However,h.. TJe consideration for this conveyance is S 0.00 :.0«'CvYC, ihC actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given cr promised which is the whole consideration. I� WITNESS t:-=REOF. I hereunto set r..iv hand on this rg 4 day of .11UYU_ . 19 cr-1 , Name of Corpora::on The ewart Trust .Address At .A � ���1 A`` , Trustee iz':arur e Tax Statement Mailing Address(i -e rota.cbove) Tide 1 J r+i C (Trustee) - CLe , Trustee STATE OF OKECON ) )33. Co my of .vas in :on ) SEE ATTACHED NOTARY PAGE — 77173 ins ..._..:was acknowledged■efc-C.Tie on (date)by _—:(;:arte(s)of person,(s)):s at authority,_ o ice . . :s:__._:c) of (aam.e: •n behalf o whom L.-ism:merit was executes). 4OP \c'a"y's SignazLre CC-^^'ssion :x:rtes:, �.1 'C:fife " c • C:t,: E z inee: _. ._ - a • •ul •, STATE OF OREGON, I.Ss. L� _ County of.. Washington BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this. 11 day of. July.. . .. _ , 199.7 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Phyllis Stewart, Truste ., Donata Stewart, Trustee and Nathan Cohen, Trustee of the Ztgwaxz..Trust known to me to be the identical individual s described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they.. executed the same freely and voluntarily. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed - my official seal the day and year last above written. CFFICtdL SEAL R P BUSHNELL E/X6e..idiciu-te- .. •,•..... NOTARY pli@l;C_CREWN Notary Public for Oreg n. CCMM�iON NO.A 028108 / my C^1044 ^ir�i ,PEI SEPT�9,!W.' My Commission expires -.-/.f �f 7 `fit AM[i,c STATE OF OREGON, L5. County of Washington BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this. 11 . ..day of July , 1997. , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Phyllis-..T_..__$.t.wa... known to me to be the identical individual..-. . described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that..-she executed the same freely and voluntarily. . IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seaal/t7he day arid/year last above written.•''% tiCl'ARY=_,;:1;:, Notary Public or Oregon. :� r1-rak�iE.SW;t+� - •, My Commission expires.. .. J_2 /1r 7 .:: :::--i',.-.;.:::::::.......:,•.:...•:-.: ::: :.!.%:':;;;-:::....:•::.:;.....';:••(---- e-cee "3, ....V . .5.----- ..':• ': '.:'.:.':.:: 'S ••••••:...:.:' ' :::'•:.::::...::':% :" • Reppeto & Associates Land Surveyors Westiawn Building - Ste. 202 Phone/ Fax 1225 N.W. Murray Rd. (503)643-8755 Portland, OR 87229 REGISTERED PR, OFESSIO • LANE Sl.'=3;lEY NAL OR December 20, 1996 Job No. 96034 S .W. 72nd Ave . & Hwy. 99 McDonald' s Corporation OREGON JULY 17.1686 'STEVEN P. BUCKLES LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 1 S .W. 72nd Avenue Street Dedication A tract of land situated in the S .E. 1/4 of Section 36, T. 1 S . , R. 1W. , W.M. , City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows : Commencing at the northeast corner of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55; thence, along the east line of said Richardson Claim, South 1°43 ' 56" West, 1356 .95 feet; thence, North 88°16 ' 04" West, 20 . 00 feet to the True Point of Beginning, said point being at the southeast corner of that tract of land conveyed by deed to the Stewart Trust recorded in fee no. 86-51674, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along the south line of said Stewart tract, South 62°49 ' 566" West, 22 .84 feet; thence, parallel with the centerline of S .W. 72nd Avenue, being 40 . 00 feet from centerline (when measured at right angles) North 1°43 ' 56" East , 461 .77 feet; thence, along the arc of a 310 .00 foot radius curve to the left through a central angle of 8°20 ' 31" (chord bears North 2°26 ' 20" West, 45 . 09 feet) a distance of 45 .13 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of S .W . 72nd Ave . as described in fee no . 94-13956, Washington County Deed Records; thence, along said westerly right of way line, South 9°16 ' 31" East, 121 . 89 feet; thence, continuing along said westerly right of way line, South 1°43 ' 56" West, 376 .06 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Contains 8 , 678 square feet . • LI . . . . ?■2%e. � s N.E. Corner George Richardson . \ : D.L.C. No. 55, Brass Cap Mon. G�� P� P P EXHIBIT MA P• od 5' = 8 20'31" R= 310.00 S. W. 72ND A VENUE R + L= 45.13 f I" STREET DEDICA TION C= 45.09 tn CB= N 2•26'20"W �;D 1 r Proposed 1 j IN THE S.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 36 McDonald's ' T. 15., R. 1W., W.M., CITY OF TIGARD, IQs Q WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON ' ' -N MAY 27, 1997 SCALE: 1" = 100' I— f -9 20 FT. STREET — DEDICATION I'''11 8,678 SQ. FT. ^ ,o �- ;-)z;,' , lui (6 (o LO ov o Stewart Trust Doc. # 86-51674 n Li ��. _.--Centerline 20 20120 REPPETO A ASSOCIATES I LAND SURVEYORS I1225 NW Murray Rd. - Room 202 S 62'49'56"W , Portland, OR 97229 22.84 N 88'16'04"W 20.00 (503) 643-8755 ■ �,,._ True Point of I Beginning Dwg. File: M96034.GCD Job No. 960.34 I . V 0 4.11.11 2■0 •01••••11.•••••••••••••. """".1••••••••=1:.-....=-"*":7-1.=.:. ..., -„.....-„,...„--...«as...1.mm.••■•■•■•••so • MIMI: 1 ............................_............. , z ,,,,,,,, .,, .111.••••••■■0. •••■•••••••••••■•••••••••••••••••••40,•••1•••••••••■•• V • ./ 7 V 7......„ \ • • / ‘ft. I‘ Xi 1 •■••••On.twos•••■•■••. Ora,1•••••••wm..••••• , • 1, ■"'....17•■•==•••=7:=Z;Z:"..= s• ..;7- • ••••• .airlift. 74. \ V ,VV .1.X7 •° i i ..."'""',...........•••■••..............law..,........■•■••••••■••■•••••. .............."'"="',...• •■••••••...to 0,1;..0.0 201•••••=1,02.000 ZZ / .... ..""4 "'X'.4'.4#61. 1 ..•... .... 1_ • % 11101111111 ° .00 MI I .....0■1•0000.1...•••••••••••••••••■••4.1.00.•0••••••••••1111.2, On, •••••••••••••0.01•=0000000.400.0•00.2...am 01,20 001106.W.0 .0.0200 00o 4.0.••002.*000.• 20 0,00.•=0.00••■•••••12,moon 010 ■•••••••••0....I.. ,I,,',, 400:, . E..!".•- ••••••••••••am•••••••■ . . .0 • . .. . >4.‘"" I . ....■. .......v.....11,.■••••••••.........•••••••■•■ , . • ..,••••••t ••• V. r.7 V'-'. .1 ,‘" '.'..-:-.L.■■••• • • ,. . 14 X \ ,,,...■•• ••••••••••=...=.=.....sr........:•••. •./' /'-." 9PC. . q. ...,. . . , gi . _XV ••• ..".' .--' 0 • 11 . . • . z ,c.,... ,,o ...t , . ..... ............................ .............. 1111,21.' .._. .,.. . , 1 . , , . ..,,. . de4' ...'" ..„.....,-...................-.._- .....--_-_-_-_,: 1.0.•10 --- - --7.---3.:••••=:17.V.r.7: sz• z" y zi I -..... ............As or ft•••••■to.■••••• ••••••••••• 2 . , • •0 Ye .... ,- ' ....,,'' .A '.0 .7 • C) ,4.'4. • •••■..01.m.a...".....7.":".=••••••"'."..:"5".......2.."...."........7:FL..•.••7 1.... .., ., :. ... # _,./ ,../......." or•••••.0.0 00/.00200.0•■•••••■•0 wg,00001,•••••••••• ..... 11 • A.V4‘• ...-4 ..• '4.- .0 1111P.s,'"4 ./ ,4 i IV, 0• 4.000.100/ 1r:_ --.-......................-.... 20•1100•••11•••••••••• =40=.":0•••=0■•=4.04:01.4===01 8/ ' „._ , , • • , , • . . , ,. • *Ilk OW 111/4 1 1 :::::: .%."'" IT:.......7::::::I'.•:: II' 1 I - -94' , . . „.......„„._.._ ._..-.---..--.... ........ 0.•••••• A. - • .. . -i 51 . • ' b4 11'4 1 I ,..._...............•....-..-............... -- - .. . .. .,:••' . .... *4° ,. •.....,,,••-,.. ..................-.................,...................... ...mm m.o.*. . ••••.0••■••••■• :=:.V.......... t.0,''.... • ...=:_f.7._.•:-..........-•••,.' ....-- ..- 6.ffel.....•• ",,..... If...••••••••••420•0a•-••••,■•••••000.0■00•••••0,060 .0-'4.10'44 * ...• ..• 4 t , 2 .1 OM,•• ra I.• V .. . •• .. W. ...-.........-...........----------. 1.. • 4 01 .•...,,,I,.......... . .......................•.....-- ........a...a.... r ./.........../.. ...................., * 1:174 ,. I ......a......-r ....NW 11/..•••• I) 00..f2.20,.............00•0 a.02......I..,0......2.00.0•00 ..40 00-,0000 00.•1004••••••••••••*mow•••■•■*a•••■•=0 = ===.071:::00•10•0000. 060:== ••••••••00.0 Wt.0,00100100•••■■•.••■•••001000/•■••••••0■1••••••■••00 •■■•0■0•14•••Ye.••••••■••••■•••••••• I . •I . / ,j . i 1 - ...-..,..• .....fly.1•01.00•••.6011•6030.11•I....-. Sur•••••oa•It*a. ••••••p.m..am.••••• , ' /# 114 l' , ,.. , r ' .OF 1 1 .t s" -• ---- ...... -...--- I ..........,......... ......................--•...... ._4....._........._...-.7,......-.:,.-=.•- • °P.'''. .,- :iiiitei \....., _ • f i P•1 • 10"'■• 4frd".II O.' . --.71 .1 ,.. 1 I * ....."..4,......7,....,, -.7,......,......•..-.4,....... - - - ••••:3•••••• -........■■••sum= =m,..,=..-77. ■'.:*";-'''"....."..*".... "'""n"....,.............................•••••••....200,••••••••0 ow ..........,0 0,...e......••••-00•••,.......0.•wow,■•.2,am.. ••••■•••■••■•••••110•••■••I*1........ .......e........o I . . A J -.r.••••••00,....••••••me•••0110 A.mot 0=110010••••■••,. 41>"......„7 t<rir S 'i 0••■•••••• 0.0•■•■••••••••• 1106..../06/.1110••••••••••■•••• . .......1-...sum...kr;a.... aro*0.1 a.m.•••••■•••• •. .. .....a, • rkt Qv-.: ll ae M I , _............0.......„...,•,,,,,0,..........•..•••0.•••.2. '• 0 W AV I -0,000 a•••••.00••••••Om.,•■•••• • ‘,4 , •',.''••• '4 4.41..1411_..... •01 fa.0•••••••.0.00••■•••■•••••1•0•110. .• ., •' i).-!`c I I war••••••000•001.,•••012.to.10104,••••Me,0••••■••■•••••00.• , . .0.0 000 0.000.*IA 10=2•0000■•••••••1.00 ao••0.0.••••00. . • r•■••••••0 p.m.. • ..ir ....'W%: s.....:e ...., . ... ,. .0000.0.0■..............•■••121.........••••1:....10.1.......=...•••••••••.................? (i) ...S. P. .•.-..-!7 7.,:.. - ,,,. i / •-• • ;.. a . 1 ..,.I i •.......•=000•••••••Of.10.00,..7.I••••••ammo ea amp an.. •••••••."•••••••••" 4. W.Ite.00..••■••••••••,,0"•••■•■•••■•0•0=0•0000110......... -www........•a•■...■••••ob..... st,...a...m..1 .....■..010.,•••1■111 a.m.••••••0 20•■•••••••0.00 •00 . cn _ \ .. ... . . _. 1 as or - . _ 1 , 3 / u LANDSCAPE PLAN ......•.....•-........n■,•000 4 , -.I Z •. .•... _ . . .• • I 0 ... t1 SW. PACIFC HIGHWAY & 72 ND. • CI • u , 2 1 f T1GARD,OR. ■ WELT '''. , I my MEd ----. ... , . .. -• .....-...-....... i......... ..........,...4 va...............•• _ elect-. ms, i, .....,.. ,-- -- - -• SD/297-cm, L'" JI_ • J City of Tigard MEMORAHDUM ShairgABetrvCommunity CITY OF TIGARD , OREGON TO: Tigard City Council FROM: Mark Roberts X1/1.13-lP DATE: October 24, 1997 SUBJECT: McDonald's and the Tigard Triangle Design Standards This memorandum has been prepared to review issues that were raised concerning the design of the new McDonald's under construction at the southwest corner of SW 72nd Avenue and SW Pacific Highway. ♦ The Mixed Use Employment Zoning District standards and connectivity standards were adopted December 30,1996. The McDonald's Site Development Review application was filed on February 12, 1997. The Tigard Triangle Design Standards became effective on March 26, 1997. Due to the timing of the application, only the general street and pedestrian connectivity standards where applicable to the McDonald's application, not the more detailed Tigard Triangle Design Standards. ♦ The Director's Decision to approve this application was discussed at two East CIT Meetings. ♦ There were no updates made to the Tigard Triangle Task Force regarding on-going development proposals within the Triangle because staff was not asked to provide this information through the Triangle Task Force review process. ♦ There was no requirement for "Portal" type improvements at the site's SW 72nd Avenue and SW Pacific Highway corner frontage because these standards were not applicable or even fully developed at the time the McDonald's application was reviewed and approved. 10/24/97 Memo to City Council Page 1 of 2 McDonald's and the Tigard Triangle Design Standards • A traffic study was not required by either the City or the Oregon Department of Transportation. Based on the number of trips that are expected to be generated by this type of use, no traffic study was warranted. It should be pointed out that at no time during the review process was the applicant proposing a new direct access to SW Pacific Highway. The Engineering Department did review the required street improvements on the SW 72nd Avenue frontage. ♦ Dedication of the Local Collector or "backage street" requirement between SW 72nd Avenue and the Act III Theater's driveway, as set forth in the adopted Tigard Triangle Standards was not required because the Design Standards, were not applicable at the time the application was made. Even if these standards were applicable, the portion of the site that is affected by this requirement was not proposed for development. ♦ The project was required to construct half street improvements along the SW 72nd Avenue frontage. No additional street improvements were required on the properties' SW Pacific Highway frontage because recent transit improvements had been completed. The project was also required to perform a downstream analysis of storm drainage conditions. The applicant was also required to provide a walkway easement and construct a walkway through the site in accordance with the interim adopted Triangle connectivity standards. A complete list of the Conditions of Approval is attached including a copy of the site/plot plan. i:lcurpin\narkr\mcdon2.doc 10/24/97 Memo to City Council Page 2 of 2 McDonald's and the Tigard Triangle Design Standards SIAl t ur uktuun RETURN RECORDED DOCUMEI• is } SS - CITY HALL RECORDS DEPART,_ i, Jnty of Washington CITY OF TIGARD I, Jerry - n• ±I r of Assess- 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ment and � ,n . • •{� io County I� Tigard,OR 97223 Clerk for ? ie• a •_ � f17 .rtify that the with r , en b ? ¶ eceived and re . •4.l�� .:., �ti o`�u of said county ? *. ,az * * CORPORATION 0� ( .tr � rector of - File No. s���d x � :tion,Ex- -'• lerk Doc : 99073958 Rect: 233900 21.00 DEDICATION DEED 06/18/1999 09:46:49am FOR ROAD OR STREET PURPOSES Barrows LLC does hereby dedicate to the public a perpetual right-of-way for street,road,and utility purposes on,over,across,under,along,and within the following described real properties in Washington County,Oregon: Attached Exhibit"A" To have and to hold the above-described and dedicated rights unto the public forever for uses and purposes hereinabove stated. The grantors hereby covenant that they are the owner in fee simple and the property is free of all liens and encumbrances, they have good and legal right to grant their right above-described, and they will pay all taxes and assessments due and owing on the property. The true consideration for this conveyance is $ 0.00 . However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is the whole consideration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I hereunto set my hand on this 1 day of February , 19 99 Barrows LLC Name of Corporation Signature 2700 NE Andresen Suite D22 IN:POLYGON CO.,AWA General Partnership Address Title IX BRENMEW' da Gerard Mfet btr HIED GAIT Vancouver, WA 98661 It1 ASSISTANT VIM MOW Signature Tax Statement Mailing Address(if different from above) Title STATE OF OR EQON ) (7�A(2,K )ss. County of Wa hingta ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on iT-r:= 1 Piz(' 14 !< i (date)by 1 ( ED `,JEST (name(s)of person(s))as (type of authority,e.g.,officer,trustee,etc.) of t)G C7OO( NCR TNLOEST C.-2) (name of party on behalf of whom instrument was executed). OLIVIA BJERKE NOTARY PUBLIC Notary's Signature STATE OF WASHINGTON /0//0.80/COMMISSION EXPIRES My Commission Expires: OCTOBEI41,2001 Accepted on behalf of the City of Tigard this 1 9 day of M y , 19 Iy P Q , . �. 2 City Engineer 11ENGIPU&FORM\ROWDE-CO.DOT J EXHIBIT"A" RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION A tract of land in that tract of land described in Deed Document No.98089341,Washington County Deed Records,in the Southwest Quarter of Section 33,Township I South,Range 1 West,W.M.,City of Tigard, Washington County,Oregon being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 32,"Pebble Creek No.2",Washington County Plat Records,said point being on the north line of Lot 66,"Castle Hill",Washington County Plat Records; Thence N00°11'29"W,along the west line of said"Pebble Creek No.2", 11.83 feet to the point of curvature for a 157.00 foot radius curve to the left; Thence leaving said west line and along the arc of said curve to the left(the chord of which bears N06°42'51"W,35.67 feet),through an included angle of 13°02'45",35.75 feet to the point tangency; Thence N13°14'14"W,38.62 feet to the point of curvature for an 13.11 foot radius curve to the right; Thence along the arc of said curve to the right(the chord of which bears N38°17'06"E,20.53 feet),through an included angle of 103°02'39",23.58 feet to the aforementioned west line of"Pebble Creek No.2"; Thence N00°11'29"W,along said west line,42.00 feet to the north right-of-way line of SW Bluestem Lane; Thence S89°48'25"W,leaving said west line, 1.70 feet to the point of curvature for an 18.00 foot radius curve to the right; Thence along the arc of said curve to the right(the chord of which bears N78°49'00"W,7.10 feet),through an included angle of 22°45'10",7.15 feet to the point of reverse curvature for a 43.00 foot radius curve to the left; Thence along the arc of said curve to the left(the chord of which bears S34°08'49"W,84.25 feet),through an included angle of 156°49'32", 117.70 feet to the point of reverse curvature for an 18.00 foot radius curve to the right; Thence along the arc of said curve to the right(the chord of which bears S28°45'05"E,9.63 feet),through an included angle of 31°01'43",9.75 feet to the point of tangency; Thence S 13°14'14"E,29.31 feet to the point of curvature for a 115.00 foot radius curve to the right; Thence along the arc of said curve to the right(the chord of which bears S06°42'51"E,26.13 feet),through an included angle of 13°02'45",26.18 feet to the point of tangency Thence S00°11'29"E, 11.81 feet to the north line of the aforementioned Lot 66,"Castle Hill"; Thence N89°49'49"E,along said north line,42.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; Containing 7,318 square feet more or less. EXHIBIT FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M., CITY OF 11GARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 34 DOC. NO. 98089341 D 22'4510" 33 R 18.00 L 7.15 CH N78'49'00"W 7.10 -� rn D 156'49'32" CO R 43.00 L 117.70 . ... ..... r CH 534'O8'49"W 84.25 .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.S89'48'25"W N C7•1.70'.' o S.W. BLUESTEM m .'.'..'.'....'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.. .'.'.'. LANE '.'..'.'..'••RIGHT-OF-WAY.•..... ...'.. . DEDICATION • 1, 7318 SF ••• •••......•'••• • • '• '•'...... ............. .. .. ............ SCALE: 1" = 30' ••'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'••-•'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'• D 103'02'39"• ••••••• ••••••••••••••• R 13.11 . . ..... .... .... L 23.58 D 31.01'43" w w CH N3817'06"E R 18.00 • • .•..•.•. .j • 20.53 L 9.75 . .. . . ..............>_ a, 1 N CH S28'45'05"E 9.63 32 31 • • ••• •• ••• • ••••• •• 0 13'02'45" • ••• R 157.00 '•'•'•' '•'•' ''•. • . ....'.'....'.'.'... .. . . . L 35.75• D 13'02'45" •• • ••• • •• • • • •• CH N06'42'51"W• •••• •• .• •••• • • •• • • •• 35.67 R 115.00 •• ••1'29"E.'.'.'.'. L 26.18 .11.81' '.'.'.'. CH 506'42'51"E . . .. ... . .. . . . . 26.13 • •" •"•" •" •" •" N00'11'29"W .. . . . . .. . . .�l11.83' �.'.'. .'.�42.00'.•.'. ...•. .. N89.49'49"E POINT OF BEGINNING LOT 66 CASTLE HILL