Correspondence excAci
‘?2; r te;..
1- �- 9 ')a APR 23 2107
'1 n
MA-446
4
.P7 pavo,-rm.Tmorp,
Page 2
December 30, 2003
Reference: Tree Assessment for Proposed Development
Location: Lot Number Seven
Subject: Tree Survey and Mitigation Report
Tree Number 2 165 - 66-67- 6840, 2186: All the trees are Western Red Cedar
trees ranging in size from 24 to 36 inches at 4.5 feet above ground. The trees are
in an area running west to east from 15 to 20 feet south of Ventura Avenue.
All of the trees health is rated at 40 percent and their structure is rated at 70
percent. The health rating is due to severe stress caused by unknown
circumstance long before the Wingate project started.
The trees are located in the buffer zone and will be preserved and protected
during construction.
* Tree Number 2185: Listed as a 50 -foot tall, 10 -inch diameter at 4.5 feet above
ground Douglas -fir tree. Tree health is rated at 40 percent and the structure at 30
percent. The tree is overcrowded, leaning towards the south and is being up-
rooted by the larger cedar trees. The tree needs to be removed before
construction takes place.
y Tree Number 2187: Listed as a 24 inch Western Red Cedar tree. The tree is a
40 -foot tall stump and needs to be removed before construction.
k There are also three 8 to 10 inch in diameter at 4.5 feet above ground Oregon
Big Leaf Maple trees that over hang Ventura Avenue that are up- rooting, leaning
towards the north with extremely poor structure that needs to be removed.
TREE CARE AND PRESERVATION
Because of the number of trees to be preserved, the particular situation of where
the trees are growing, the species of the trees, and the proposed construction,
there must be a Certified Arborist on -site and/or on -call for the entire project;
especially during any excavating near the preserved trees. In this way, decisions
can be made in the field that are only speculations in this writing.
—W OK ko c`eMoj
Per Ma SJ E
(flhIkIh1, - p /G 5.
CA.. .. , • •
kb
�� 1 Ka :..
• /• � L
r :
rci � -
`� 1
�9 � �ti t v
-2t EL=25a ._._._._. S8. 53'21 °E � 1 _ L' ■∎1 E L =256'
lA t. IP ` -4' for --_,,. ,, ,.
.‘ da■O --------1--- 2-1.4 ' 6-4-
di
%1 I I -K�t.. '� • '�X X 1) < �Ci ° k x DC 7(X K
i 5.
Ill --- 1 — - -(j'- 1 —'+�
•
l� ;
IM D ECK /
i.,L. , k ., PROPOSED it,t l - /_,,,,...L.
O.� STREET TREES MUST p ,O.
�p P L 19E- c� O
O
_i_.. 2 DEVELOPMENT TREE PLAN r p
i 0.- -wig ( .4 5 ,7 „ , 1 t.(2., l (il
i I I
co..:-:" ' `. ` VIT `% TIGARD - SITE PLAN REVIEW] ,,,
BUI P NG PER
i � -- X66 _ _ MIT NO.: w • �,�i —OGt� ■ (�,,,�,, afgrjoibi.... J'CNA_:IV!SION:
u ir d S etbacks: Bf 'pp. _ ❑ Not Approvei :
I �/ L'� h rOVed
• Side:
i Ma ;8 ' =5_ Street Side: f5 aage Front. _ail_ _ Gare: •t' _2__4) Rear: L i. ..
t_._._._._. A vj;taf Clearance: [� pproved ❑ Not Appro
b
EL =2a9 X70 axlrnt +m Buikiin Hei Itt
•
, r s b $ feet A-
to � t� L= 4438' %� ('WS Service Provider Letter Required: 0 Yes RI N$
R =5Y `
0 Received U
IF L(9S d-ZI0? sh y > EL F J �t,P" Date: =t! lc '? "'
1 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT:
•
C Actual SIo e ° (�A roved "
�
TI�.z�:� �� N P � � /o PP ❑ Not A rov - - -_�_ . _; •�
''`'U^ z n e� Site Plan. PP y
exak.�»�c�:,E m P ( Approved Q Not A
•pprov ►� uuti Occ �. rw�QS1 re. B : _! , PProv...! _ •
. ,- .ry�M1/ A Date: z o , k-` = 1 _ -
o
s: Z.tTt' � M- GY47'Y'..L S L".-i_6-1/' -/S c' K.a� .+
0 rte. pea s F PRO JCC 6AL � ,4, _ 14-4C.4...... � , -::::ii
Kxx- XX s: ti i 1S 1W 36AA 08500 e L_
10039 SW 70TH PL oerlan
TIGARD OR CITY OF TIGARD - SITE PLAN REVIEW
BUILDING PERMIT NO: ST$Cp7�60--!0 —I AII
SUNTEL HOME DESIGN, INCAS NOT r � 1
R THE ACCURACY OF THE
St reet. Tr ees: v \L
THE SOLE RESPONSB '14
LIABLE FO Approved of A
R IS
Approved
LRY OF THE ^ w
TOPOGRAPHY INFORMATION.
BULDER TO VERIFY ALL SITE
CONDmONS, NCLUDING ANY FILL B : . Protected Treys: C 1 ® Approved I` of Approved ` �"
Alit Date:` ' S " {.2
PLACED ON THE SITE, AND NFORM 1rOte�� "" .
OWNERS OF ANY POTENTIAL FIELD S 7 r, e •; viol- : . _
MODIFICATIONS 1' +t; i ^u
Y p
7 , pFS1
`a'��..�X .1 : .,� � CST �:1Julcn) i T � 4.r,�- — G: , •-, t' C :'Y:• ?1r.�Yl
I g t / srt4,4- t' T QSP