Loading...
SDR1994-00025 • Ec14- CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0025 RICHARD COOPER - OWNER BOSTON CHICKEN N.W. - APPLICANT APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval for a 3,361 square foot fast -food restaurant with a drive - through window. Comprehensive Plan: C -G, (General Commercial). Zone: C -G, (General Commercial). Location: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 03DD, tax lot 1000). SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 1. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department(639- 4171) 2. The applicant shall re- construct the existing driveway approach onto SW Gaarde Street in accordance with a design approved by the Engineering Department, and obtain a Street Opening Permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept. (639 -4171) 3. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right -of -way of SW Pacific Highway (99W) . A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of the building permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept. (639- 4171). 4. The applicant shall provide for on -site water quality treatment, as shown on the site plan, as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. Design calculations shall be in conformance with the general requirements of Surface Water Quality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook, USA, 1991. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 -4171) NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 1 • • 5. The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream storm drain system will not be unduly affected by the on -site storm drainage run -off. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 -4171) 6. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the northerly side of Pacific Highway, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept. (639- 4171) 7. The applicant shall provide copies of the recorded private easement documents that pertain to the access to the existing public sewer and storm drain systems, and include the connection work in the required Street Opening Permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept. (639- 4171) 8. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Revised impervious surface / landscaping calculations. b. Screening plan for any rooftop mechanical devices. Any proposed screening shall be a year -round screen. c. Revised landscaping plan which reflects changes in the site plan. d. Provision of a 200 foot drive -thru stacking lane. e. Screening within the 20 foot buffer shall contain 30 five gallon or 60 one gallon shrubs in addition to one row of trees not less than 10 feet high for deciduous trees and 5 feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity. f. Provision for an additional three pedestrian connections as follows: 1) Connection from the southeast building entrance to SW Pacific Highway to a location within approximately 10 feet of the southeast corner of the property; 2) a direct connection from the existing sidewalk on the adjoining property to the south to the west side of the proposed restaurant, providing a continuous connection to SW Gaarde Street; 3) connection to the northern property via the northeast corner of the restaurant pad to the landscaped island immediately to the north. The landscaped island shall be redesigned to incorporate a NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 2 • • 4 foot sidewalk. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6 inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3 foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obtructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. g. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- off. 9. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Department for the removal of the existing office building. 10. An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted to the Police Department for review and approval. Staff Contact: Kelly Jennings, Police Department (639- 4171). 11. Identify the existing bus stop on the plans. The applicant should coordinate with Tri -Met for specific locations of passenger landing areas to meet ADA requirements. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 12. All site improvements shall be installed as approved per the revised site plan. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS A. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 3 • • Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Backround: No development applications were found to have been filed with the City of Tigard. 2. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located north of the intersection of SW Gaarde Street, SW McDonald Street and SW Pacific Highway. The site borders SW Pacific Highway to the east, a residential zone to the west, a bookstore /florist shop to the south and a commercial /retail plaza, with a day care center, to the north. Properties to the north, south and east are zoned C -G (General Commercial). Properties to the west are zoned R -7 (Residential, 7 units per acre). 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site consists of approximately 56,574 square feet and is presently occupied by an automobile dealership. The applicant is proposing to construct a 3,361 square foot Boston Chicken drive -thru restaurant. The proposal includes an access to the property to the south with related modifications to the parking lot of that property. 4. Other Staff Comments: The Tigard Water Department has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: A minimum of a 2" double check valve assembly (backflow prevention) device will need to be installed directly behind 2" water meter. This location is also known as "Property line protection ". In addition to the 2" double check valve assembly, point of use protection is required i.e. at the icemaker and at the soda machine if the equipment uses City water for mixing. Point of use protection is in the Uniform Plumbing Code. 5. Agency Comments: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 4 • • Tri -Met has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The site is served by transit along SW Pacific Highway with 15 minute and better transit frequency during the peak hour, and half- hourly midday service and Saturday and Sunday service. A recent passenger census indicates that there are a relatively high number of transit customers using the Gaarde Street and Tigard Motors stops. Because of the proximity of the proposed building to the major transit corridor along SW Pacific Highway, it is critical that the building respond to existing and future pedestrian activity in the vicinity. The following comments respond to the requirements from the Transportation Planning Rule that new developments must orient to existing transit stops and that they provide safe and convenient pedestrian linkages to nearby destinations such as shopping centers and residential areas. The attached plan illustrates the following suggested changes to the plan to create more continuous and direct routes for pedestrians. The routes connect the building to primary pedestrian destinations including the bus stops, the adjacent retail center and potential future development on the site immediately north of the Boston Chicken site. 1) Create a continuous and direct pedestrian route along the building facade linking to the adjacent properties as indicated on the plan. 2) Relocate the building further south to minimize the distance and amount of surface parking pedestrians must cross to enter the building from the south. Adequate width should be maintained to allow for the drive - through lane. 3) Widen the paved entrance area on the southern side of the building to match the 12' 7" width shown on the northern side of the building. This widening would terminate at the drive - through window. 4) Incorporate an overhang /awning as indicated on the plan to provide weather protection along the identified pedestrian route. 5) Identify the existing bus stop on the plans. The applicant should coordinate with Tri -Met for specific locations of passenger landing areas to meet ADA requirements. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 5 • • 6) Where the pedestrian network crosses vehicle maneuvering areas, the crossing should be raised and delineated by a change in materials. The Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Water quality swale as proposed is not adequate to meet removal rates. The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: 1) A traffic study is needed; 2) Curb and sidewalk improvements as per ODOT standards are needed; 3) On -site detention is necessary if the applicant proposes to connect to the State's system; 5) A cross -over easement upon redevelopment must be submitted to ODOT before construction. Staff Contact: Sam Hunaidi (229- 5002). General Telephone and Electronics has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Developer to place conduit for telephone service to GTE specifications. The City of Tigard Maintenance Services Department, City of Tigard Building Division, City of Tigard Police Department, Tualatin Valley Fire District, Portland General Electric, has reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been recieved. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a fast food restaurant with a drive through service aisle. A restaurant is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Eating and Drinking Establishment. Code Section 18.62.030 allows Eating and Drinking establishments as a permitted use in the C -G zoning district. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the C -G zoning district. The site has an average lot width of approximately 180 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the C -G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant is proposing approximately 18,506 square feet or 32% of the site for landscaping. The applicant shall submit revised NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 6 • • impervious surface calculations to reflect changes in the site plan related to the addition of pedestrian walkways. Setbacks: Section 18.62.050 states that no setbacks are required except that 20 feet shall be required where the C -G zone abuts a residential district. The west property line abuts a residential zone and therefore a 20 foot setback is required. The plan shows a 20 foot landscaped setback, thereby satisfying this criteria. The applicant is proposing a building height of 17 feet, well under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Section 18.120.180(A)(1) (Site Development Review - Approval Standards) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are chapters 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.150, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Code Chapters is reviewed in the following sections. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.84 (Sensitive Lands), 18.92 (Density Computations), 18.94 (Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations), 18.98 (Building Height Limitations: Exceptions), or 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures) which are also listed under section 18.120.180.A.1. These Chapters are therefore found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Code section 18.120.180.A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Oudoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment: Section 18.120.180.2 states that buildings shall be located to preserve existing trees, topography, and natural drainage and that trees having a six inch caliper or greater shall be preserved or replaced by new plantings of equal character. The site is currently developed and does not contain natural drainage or existing trees in need of preservation. Buffering, Screening and Compatibility between adioininq uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This criteria shall be satisfied as addressed in the Buffer NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 7 • • Matrix (18.100.130) section below. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has been required to provide a 20 foot landscape buffer along the west property line. The plan shows screening of the disposal area with an 8 foot wall which is itself screened with landscaping. In addition, the parking lot and drive -thru area has been landscaped around the perimeter of their respective areas. The applicant shall submit plans which show how any rooftop mechanical devices will be screened, this screen shall be a year -round screen. Privacy and Noise: Section 18.102.108.5 requires that buildings be oriented in a manner which protects private spaces on adjoining properties from view and noise and provides a buffer from uses which create noise, lights or glare. A 20 foot landscaped buffer has been designed to protect the neighboring residential private spaces and the building has been sited on the eastern portion of the property. The drive -thru area has been further screened from view and the menu board and meal ordering area has been sited so that the noise is not directed toward the residences. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.102.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted which reflects changes in the site plan related to the addition of pedestrian walkways. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The preliminary landscape plan shows the provision of 6 red sunset maple trees to be spaced approximately 30 feet apart, satisfying this requirement. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 8 • • Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, the applicant has provided screening of the parking lot and drive -thru areas in accordance with this section. Screening of Refuse Containers and Service Facilities . Section 18.100.110(B) and (D) requires that such facilities be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. The applicant is proposing a masonry trash enclosure, thereby satisfying this criteria. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The Matrix indicates that where a commercial development abuts a residential zone the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. The site abuts a residential zone on the west property line. A 20 foot buffer and screening area shall therefore be required along this property line. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1) At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall be not less than 10 feet high for deciduous trees and 5 feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity; 2) In addition, at least 10 five gallon shrubs or 20 one gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 3) The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover or spread with bark mulch. The west buffer area contains approximately 3,600 square feet respectively. Therefore, the buffer shall contain 30 five gallon or 60 one gallon shrubs in addition to the one row of trees. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted indicating landcaping and screening within the buffer area in accordance with this section. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 9 . • property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. As indicated on the site plan, this requirement shall be satisfied. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(C) requires a minimum of one parking space for every 50 square feet of dining area, plus one space for every two employees. The site plan indicates the dining area to be approximately 1,232 square feet and the applicant estimates that there will be 24 employees. The total number of required parking spaces is 37 spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 59 parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 3 disabled parking spaces if 51 to 75 parking spaces are provided. This site provides 59 parking spaces, thereby requiring 3 disabled parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 3 disabled person parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Four bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development. The site plan indicates the location of one bicycle rack which accomodates 4 bicycles, thereby satisfying this criteria. On -Site Vehicle Stacking Areas: Section 18.106.060 (A) requires a reservoir requirement of 200 feet per service terminal for drive -in restaurants. Stacking lanes must be designed so that they do not interfere with parking and vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle circulation. This requirement is not satisfied as a 180 foot stacking lane has been provided. A revised plan shall be submitted which provides for a 200 foot stacking lane. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 10 III • Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum access width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. In addition, curbs are required as well as a five foot sidewalk. The plan shows the provision of two access drives. The SW Pacific Highway drive is shown with a width of 30 feet, including curbs and a 6 foot sidwalk along the south side. The secondary access is a 26 foot wide drive accessing the property to the south. The applicant shall be required to obtain an access easement from the adjoining property to the south. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum 6 inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3 foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obtructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The proposed site plan shows the provision of one walkway connection to SW Pacific Highway but does not provide connections with adjoining commercial development. A revised site plan shall be submitted which provides for pedestrian connections to the adjoining commercial developments in the following manner: 1) direct access from the southern development's sidewalk to the west sidewalk of the proposed restaurant; and 2) connection to the northern property via the northeast corner of the restaurant pad to the landscaped island immediately to the north. The landscaped island shall be redesigned to incorporate a 4 foot sidewalk. Where pedestrian connections cross vehicle maneuvering areas, the crossing should be raised and delineated by a change in materials. Transportation Planning Rule. OAR 660- 12- 045(4) (b). This section states that new retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit through the following NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 11 • • measures: A) Orienting building entrances to the transit stop or station; B) Clustering buildings around transit stops; and, C) Locating buildings as close as possible to transit stops. The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct, safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by removing other barriers to pedestrian access. Building entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct, safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development and the transit stop. New retail and office buildings located on transit streets should have at least one public entrance facing the transit street or, if not facing, be within a specified distance of the transit route. A combination of building orientation, distance and pedestrian amenities can work together to display and direct a person to an entrance, and to make a journey pleasant, logical and obvious. OAR 660-12-045(3)(d) requires provision of internal pedestrian circulation in commercial developments through clustering of buildings, construction of pedestrain ways and similar techniques. Walkways should minimize walking distances and avoid unnecessary meandering. Pedestrian connections to streets, transit stops and adjacent development are critical to reducing auto trips. The proposed building is set back from the transit street, provides one pedestrian connection to SW Pacific Highway and does not provide pedestrian linkages to adjacent commercial development. Tri -Met has strongly recommended that the applicant move the building closer to the street and provide for an additional four pedestrian connections in order to comply with this rule. The City agrees with Tri -Met that a greater number of pedestrian connections would bring the proposed plan into compliance with the rule. The Transportation Planning Rule recognizes that fast food restaurants need special design considerations to make them both pedestrian and auto - friendly, and that both types of traffic need to be accommodated. The Planning Department believes that provision of three additional pedestrian connections, without relocation of the proposed building, would allow a reasonable accommodation of both automobile and pedestrian traffic. The pedestrian connections shall coincide with the pedestrian linkages recommended by Tri - Met, as shown on the site plan dated November 1, 1994. A revised site plan shall be submitted which provides for an additional three pedestrian connections as follows: 1) Connection from the southeast building entrance to SW Pacific Highway to a location within approximately 10 feet of the southeast corner of the property; 2) a direct connection from the existing sidewalk on the adjoining NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 12 III • property to the south to the west side of the proposed restaurant, providing a continuous connection to SW Gaarde Street; 3) connection to the northern property via the northeast corner of the restaurant pad to the landscaped island immediately to the north. The landscaped island shall be redesigned to incorporate a 4 foot sidewalk. This connection would allow for the opportunity for future pedestrian connection with redevelopment of the property to the north. Signs: Section 18.114.130 (C) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C -G zone. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on -site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick -up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign-off. The applicant shall submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030(E) (1) (a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1. STREETS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study entitled "Transportation Impact Analysis ", "Boston Chicken, SW Gaarde Street /Highway 99W" prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated September, 1994. The report analyzes the effects of the additional traffic from the site at the existing driveway and the impact to the traffic on SW Pacific Highway, a State Highway. The report concludes that the additional traffic will have little impact on the traffic utilizing SW Pacific Highway and the closest street intersection at SW Gaarde Street /SW McDonald Street. No public improvements are recommended. However, the traffic report assumes that the existing driveway onto SW Pacific Highway is to provide full- access. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 13 • • The report is currently being reviewed by ODOT and may require an up -date if the driveway is to provide right -turn in, right -turn out only, as a condition of approval by ODOT. The applicant is required to obtain a revised ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Pacific Highway. The highway has been constructed to current State standards and no additional right -of -way or street construction is required. In addition, the site plans shows access to SW Gaarde Street, across the contiguous property to the south. The applicant should establish a mutual access and manintenance agreement for this driveway. The existing driveway approach should be re- constructed with a radius entrance to facilitate the right turn off of SW Gaarde Street. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along both sides of SW Pacific Highway and the applicant should place the facilities located along this frontage underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer is located in an easement at the rear of the property and has sufficient capacity to serve this proposed development. The site plan indicates that a private easement will be required to cross a portion of the adjacent property. Prior to the issuance of the plumbing permit, the applicant should provide a copy of the necessary recorded easement document to the Building Department. 3. STORM SEWER: The site currently is partially covered by an existing parking lot that serves the existing auto sales business. The site drains toward the rear to an underground system within the adjoining Gaarde Park subdivision. The applicant's preliminary grading indicates that a water quality swale is to be constructed along the rear landscape area and that the storm water will be transported to the existing underground system with a new catch basin and new underground pipe at the southwest corner of the site. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. The applicant's preliminary site plan NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 14 • • provides for the required on -site water quality facility. The facility should comply with the minimum USA design standards, and shall be maintained by the applicant. SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Representative XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON /1 -114- 1 1 1 ( UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. �/ tl _ y y . 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639- 4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 w -Mr PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE 'ssi :ant Planner '/ al APPROVED BY: Richard Bewe sdorff DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE 15 . i rte, l Al* L irj reP110 (< rn . i I - ' 0: 5 n �1 ■■■ O 1m 2 , Illm :LI AI MI eve 1 11 • g -< / II PP twa t 40 pm 4111/ w, i g s --- -o 4* 4 11 6- 1111 1 P. 10,-m ,, . Ligli ___ ),, 0 % * 43 lb -11 ....... u)1:. .. n 3 Rt. • r ' i • • . • ea (I) .7) m • . 111 t 11 p - "m4 •MLr1!!IIUI - c -I owsemp ii. • . 8 n milioned n *--- CU 7 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. .#1. .r,44, - 2S103DD -00600 2S103DD -00700 TIGARD GRANGE NO. 448 GILBERTSON, LLOYD BY HENRY METZENTINE DARLENE J 12210 SW SUMMERCREST . 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00800 2S103DD -01100 EMPIRE ENTERPRISES INC JEFFERY, HARRY E /JUDITH A ATTN: YANG -JUN SHIN BY CHRISTIAN GIFT CENTER 422 RAILWAY STREET - - 13975 SW PACIFIC HWY STE A VANCOUVER, BC TIGARD OR 97223 CANADA V6A 1B1 2S103DD -01200 2S103DD -01201 LUTHER, W V WINNIE M MILLER, PRUDENCE M BY: L P BUSCH INC 4220 SW GREENLEAF DRIVE 2624 PACIFIC AVE PORTLAND OR 97221 FOREST GROVE OR 97116 2S103DD -01000 2S103DD -02400 ROSSI, ALDO TIGARD, CITY OF % COOPER, RICHARD A 13125 SW 13935 SW PACIFIC HWY PO BOX 23 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 z 2S103DD -02500 2S103DD -02600 OTTOMAN, PATRICIA A & NORMAN R DILL, BEBE E 21635 SW ELWELT RD 10900 SW GARDEN PARK PL SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -02700 2S103DD -02800 SHELDON, GEORGE & CAROLYN MULFLUR, THOMAS & CYNTHIA R 123 NW 2ND AVE 4534 SW T CT PORTLAND OR 97209 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S103DD -02900 2S103DD -03000 TIGARD, CITY OF GARDDE PARK 13125 SW HALL OWNERS OF ALL S PO BOX 23397 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -03100 2S103DD -03200 RUBIO, MARGEAUX C WARD, GENEVIEVE M 2028 GRAHN DR 16030 SW WIMBLEDON CT SANTA ROSA CA 95404 TIGARD OR 97224 2S103DD -03300 2S103DD -03400 TINDALL, HERBERT G & GRACE A KELLEHER, PHILL M & BARBARA J 10820A & 10820E SW GARDEN PARK PO BOX 23023 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -03500 2S103DD -03600 KELLEHER, PHILLI M & BARBARA J KELLEHER, PHILL M & BARBARA J PO BOX 23023 PO BOX 23023 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 • .2S103DD -03700 ` • 2S103DD -038 KELLEHER, PHILLIP 11 & BARBARA J MULFLUR, THOMAS E & IA R _PO BOX 23023 7 4535 SW TARLOW TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S103DD -03900 2S103DD -04000 MULFLUR, THOMAS E & CYNTHIA L GLAHN, RANDOLPH L & LEANN 4535 SW TARLOW CT 10750 SW GARDEN PARK PL - PORTLAND OR 97221 TIGARD OR 97223 • 2S103DD -04100 2S103DD -04200 GRAY,.RANDY J & GOOLEY, DAVID JOS & TERESA LY SHIPPEY, JULIANE M 4635 SW 42ND 10740 SW GARDEN PARK PL PORTLAND OR 97221 - -- TIGARD OR .97223 2S103DD -04300 2S103DD -04400 GOOLEY, DAVID JOSEPH & TERESA LY MULFLUR, THOMAS CYNTHIA R 4635 SW 42ND PL 4535 SW TARLO CT PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221 • 2S103DD -04500 2S103DD -04600 MULFLUR, THOMAS & CYNTHIA R HOLMES, HAROLD W /CLARA V 4535 SW TARLO CT 5455 REGENT ST W PORTLAND OR 97221 TILLAMOOK OR 97141 2S103DD -05300 2S103DD -05400 KELLEHER, PHILLIP M MILLER, BRUCE R 17690 SW SHAWNEE TRAIL 9255 SW 3RD AVE TUALATIN OR 97062 PORTLAND OR 97219 2S103DD -05500 2S110AA -00600 ROBERTS, RICHARD D AND TEXLAND PROPERTIES CORP JACQUELINE J 2828 N HASKELL AVE 10495 SW 135TH AVE DALLAS TX 75204 BEAVERTON OR 97005 2S110AA -00700 2S110AA -02800 UNION OIL CO OF CALIFORNIA DANNA BROTHERS PROPERTIES ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DIV 9800 SE STARK ST PO BOX 7600 PORTLAND OR 97216 LOS ANGELES CA 90051 BOSTON CHICKEN 1111 MAIN ST VANCOUVER WA 98660 RICHARD A COOPER 13935 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD OR 97223 lig PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SDR 94 -0025 FILE TITLE: BOSTON CHICKEN APPLICANT: Boston Chicken N.W. OWNER: Richard A. Cooper 1111 Main St. 13935 SW Pacific Highway Vancouver, WA 98660 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 03DD, tax lot 1000). West of Pacific Highway, north of SW Gaarde Street and south of SW Watkins Ave. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The General Commercial zone allows Public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. CIT: Central CIT REPRESENTATIVE: Jerry Swank PHONE NUMBER: 639 -6607 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: X STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1994 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 ATTACHMENTS X VICINITY MAP X LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X SITE PLAN X OTHER: GRADING PLAN STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea - 639 -4171 } Aft 41/. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard I, ti 6 WWW ' C Klid1i& lA. , being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) //`` That I am ;bet/ \*PilA ,PDPe for The City of Ti..rd, Oregon. / That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (/ / That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: 1/ of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named sons at t e �addre s shown ow attached list marked exhibit "B" on the p day of 8 f 19 , said notice NOTICE OF D gISION as her to att c ed, was poste n an appropriate bulletin board on the 111 day of D , 19 ; and depo�ssited in the United States Mail on the 1►^ day of , 19 7 i f , postage prepaid. Prepared Notice 7-(1` Sub ibed and sworn /affirmed before me on the da y of . / > L % / ' „,-\ 19. _ OFFICIAL SEAL ~ 77 ( flOi4{Ef~ Pdl. .NI L�+4S 4 _L 'zir -',y NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ,; �� - Y PUBLIC 7•T OREGON 1,0' COMMISSION NO. 008971 My Commission pires: Are MY COMMISSION EXPIRES eEPT. 7, i � q2-( v�eQ � e -G ' cemd b- CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO.$ R qui-as OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. aW- a ,3bn0, APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: DATE: (: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION �A) Application form (1) 13935 S.W. Pacific Hwy. I f � (B) Owner's signature /written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. authorization • 25103DD, Tax Lot 1000 1 1 (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 56,574 sq.ft. (approx. 1.3 acres) \l(D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* Richard A. Cooper (E) Plot plan (pre - app checklist) ADDRESS 13935 S.W. Pacific Hwy. PHONE (F) Applicant's statement CITY Tigard, OR ZIP 97223 (pre -app checklist) APPLICANT* Boston Chicken N.W. (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 1111 Main St. PHONE 206 - 750 - 0668 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Vancouver, WA ZIP 98660 / Filing fee ($4.‘5 ) *When the owner and the applicant are different ✓ (I) Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record O(6 t ('00 o or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN /ZONE DES / NATION: C 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY _ & G (' _ The owners of record of the subject property l� request site development review approval'to•',' N.P.O. Number: allow construction of a new Boston Chicken . Approval Date: Restaurant (3,361 sq.ft.) with a 59 stall parking lot and code complying site landscaping. Final Approval Date: • Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 0 0 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: No other land use actions required. 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. • DATED this /3 day of ) /(Z)jjY) 19 9 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. (KSL:pm /0524P) • • SITE DESIGN REVIEW STATEMENT SEPT. 16, 1994 SW PACIFIC HWY. & GAARDE TIGARD, OREGON SITE: • The site is located on S.W. Pacific Hwy in Tigard, Oregon. S.W. Pacific Hwy is a heavily traveled arterial that links Tigard and other outlying suburban communities south of the Portland metropolitan area with the city center. • The site is bounded by Pacific Highway to the east, the rear yards of single family residences to the west, a day care center and mini -mall to the north, and the Christian Supply Store to the south. * O.D.O.T. (Oregon Department of Transportation) has imposed restrictions on additional new access onto Pacific Highway. Our firm has had several meetings with O.D.O.T. to discuss access issues. It appears that Boston Chicken will be allowed to use the existing driveway into the site. If there is any future change of use and/or new development at the shopping center O.D.O.T. will most likely require a new shared access driveway with the shopping center north of the site. Boston Chicken's existing driveway and the shopping center's southerly driveway will be eliminated in the process of consolidating access. The shared access will be accomplished via a reciprocal easement with the shopping center. • Kittelson & Assoc. has prepared a traffic study of the site. A copy of the report is included in this application submittal. According to Mark Butorac of Kittelson & Assoc., his preliminary work indicates that there is no anticipated major traffic impact related to the existing site access. ZONING: * The General Commercial Zone applies to the project and surrounding properties along Pacific Highway. The zone permits a wide range of retail and commercial uses including restaurants with drive - through facilities. * This project requires a Site Development Review. The submittal package included in this application consists of drawings and site plans that delineate existing site conditions, surrounding uses, proposed landscaping, building elevations, parking plans and a traffic study. On 8/4/94, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss the restaurant proposal. A copy of the mailing list and other documents related to the C.I.T. process are enclosed with this application. One neighbor attended the 8/9/94 meeting. • • LAYOUT: Building Setbacks: All yard dimensions are code compliant. Parking: * More than adequate parking is provided. Based on building size and use, only 28 spaces are required. The number and placement of handicap spaces meets the code requirements. The drive -in queuing lane length complies with code requirements. Landscaping: * Based on the site plan, the proposed landscaping exceeds code standards. The General Commercial zones require that 15% of site area be landscaped. This site would require approximately 8,486 sq. ft. of landscaping. The site plan shows that approximately 18,506 sq.ft of landscaping is provided, or approximately 33% of site area. Along the rear property line, the code also requires a 20 ft. wide landscaped area that buffers the existing residences from commercial uses. A 20 ft. wide landscaped area is delineated on the enclosed landscape plan. Street trees will be required along Pacific Highway frontage, and are also delineated on the landscape plan. The proposed landscaping and screening exceed the intent of the code. SIGNAGE: • The zoning code allows one Boston Chicken pylon sign or monument sign on the site not exceeding 22 feet in height and not over 90 sq.ft. per sign face. Total pylon sign area and height depends on the sign's setback from Pacific Highway. The sign is set back 15 feet from the highway pavement, therefore it can be up to the maximum size and height quoted above. The proposed sign is 22' tall, with 75 sq. ft. per sign face for a total of 150 sq. ft. of sign area. The pole of the pylon sign is on the site and the sign cabinet does not project into the Pacific Highway right of way. No pylon or monument sign can be placed in a "clear vision area" at the intersection of the existing driveway and Pacific Highway. In this case, the sign must be set back at least 35 feet from the intersection. The sign has been placed outside the clear vision as shown on the site plan. The proposed sign complies with the code. The zoning code allows typical building wall sign types (i.e., awning, fascia or projecting). Wall signs cannot be more than 15% of any wall area. Based on the alignment of the restaurant, signage will be placed on the northerly, southerly, and easterly building walls. (see enclosed elevational drawings) The total signage proposed per building wall is less than the signage square footage allowed by the code, therefore the proposed signage complies with the code. III • INFRASTRUCTURE: * Water service is available in Pacific Highway. The utility will bring it to the site. * Sanitary sewer is available from an existing line at the northwest corner of the site. * Storm sewer is available near the southwest corner of the site. Because the storm line is approximately 15 feet from the property line, an easement would be needed from the neighboring property owner. (see enclosed Utility Plan) * Fire protection is available from a hydrant located at the southeast corner of the site. KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW. ALDER, SUITE 700 • PORTLAND, OR 97205 • (503) 228 -5230 • FAX (503) 273 -8169 TRANSMITTAL NOTICE PROJECT: Boston Chicken - SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W JOB NO.: 1327.00 DATE: September 14, 1994 TO: Mr. Bruce Vincent Jim Griffith & Associates, Inc. 1820 SW Vermont Street, Suite K Portland, OR 97219 The following items are enclosed: No. of Copies Description 8 Copies of the "Transportation Impact Analysis - Boston Chicken SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W" for Tigard, Oregon BELLEVUE • PORTLAND • SACRAMENTO From: Julie Martin To: Date: 9/14/94 Time: 08:44:39 Page 1 of 1 4= RU'1'IS%I(KI IC ! Ail= T /` Memorandum 1 TO: City of Tigard, Planning Department • DATE: September 14, 1994 SUBJECT: North / Northwest Corner of Pacific Highway and Gaarde, Tigard, Oregon The undersigned has negotiated a purchase transaction with BC Northwest with respect to the above referenced property. This letter shall serve as authorization for BC Northwest to participate in the design review process, as well as submit and acquire building permits for this property. kieet:j4t( 7 • PRE- 4.,ICATION CONFERENCE REOOST 13935 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, Oregon Prepared For: Boston Chicken Northwest 703 Broadway, Suite 500 Vancouver WA.98660 Prepared By: Jim Griffith & Associates, Inc. 1820 SW Vermont Street, Suite K Portland, OR 97219 May 27, 1994 Request: The applicant requests a pre - application conference to discuss the proposed construction of a restaurant at the subject site. • Zoning: C -G • • Site Size: 21,962 sq. ft. (.5 A.) PRESENT AND ADJACENT LAND USES: The subject site is currently occupied by a used car lot. (Tigard Motor Co.) There is an existing mobile office structure on -site. The mobile office will be removed prior to construction of the restaurant. The properties west of the site are occupied with single family residences and are zoned R -7. In general, the surrounding area is a mixture of commercial developments. A Christian book store fronts Pacific Hwy. and abuts the southern end of the site. A vacant service station is to the east of the site across Pacific Hwy. A shopping center abuts the northern property boundary. All abutting properties other than land to the west are zoned CG. Other retail and commercial businesses occupy both sides of Pacific Hwy. north and south of the site. REASON FOR REQUEST: Boston Chicken wants to establish a high quality restaurant at this site. They provide fresh rotisserie roasted chicken meals with a variety of side dishes. The subject site meets the majority of their requirements for visibility, traffic flow, and demographics. The restaurant at this site will have inside seating and a drive through facility. (see enclosed site plan) The applicant is requesting a pre - application conference so that all the affected departments within the city can explain to Boston Chicken staff what will required of them to establish a restaurant at this site. Boston Chicken wants to use the existing Christian book store parking lot as a means of secondary ingress and egress. The applicant requests that city staff specifically respond to Boston Chicken's request to use this secondary accessway. 0 0 • V ..1 „ dam / b \ N \ / \ \ / \ . - - 4. ///; `\ \ \\\ \\ \ 1 U I __. b n / � � �7 p � .. i - -- \ / ///'-`�/ /// ,.. ,,, `� EI1] a (mil •i�,\ --1 • __, N _- zT>i< 1_6; u..., f•i..- i 66 N ?!..: N 1 ... 1 . 4 .:13:°:-:.:.::!;Oppcti:.C44:0-.F.I:c4*:...:..ko..:..:.::. LI lC N as %' 6 N ■ 4 N I,. O? -\ Cf _ \ � ���� / 1 N . N 1 ‹=, to sue\ A a N io . -c`N 4 44 44 ; .. N (3 45 ° 0 s *s. • N s� o \ D' N N 1 . ..G i v PROTOTYPE : 4.1 PACIFIC HWY and GAARDE AVE BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES S ITE PLAN ARCHITECTS. P,C. l;(77ti� 1NV. TEPID.' �_ TIGARD, OREGON _ P«n> J FAX (sos� 22e4e21 II8®I'IISSIEIIBIIIE OPTION DATE SCALE PROJ. # ' 5 -24 -Q4 1"=50I-0" x4138 4 DWG. NAME DRAWN BY NT 1 1 31 4138501.DWG KMG • • MEMO Date: August 5, 1994 To: File, BCNW Tigard From: James E. Griffith , /,° Re: Neighborhood Me 1u g A meeting was held at the Tigard Grange, 7 p.m., August 4, 1994, for all neighbors who were interested in the development of a Boston Chicken Restaurant proposed for construction at 13935 SW Pacific Highway. There was one person in attendance from the neighborhood. Mr. Chris Lind, BCNW, Construction Manager discussed the BC Northwest L.P. organization and presented information about the Boston Chicken restaurant. Mr. Jim Griffith, Jim Griffith & Assoc. discussed the development requirements and the site plan. The participant attending raised no issues and offered no suggestions. Being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned. 4110 • SIGN IN LOG Neighborhood Meeting For BC, NORTHWEST L.P. "Boston Chicken" Restaurant Tigard, Oregon August 4, 1994 NAME ADDRESS 1 f /1 ?2 S. IV 6/77iwage, r ?ld 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 • IP • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD I, James E. Griffith , being duly sworn, depose and say that on July 19 , 18 94 , I paused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at 13935 SW Pacific Hwy., Tigard, OR 97223 , a copy of which so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at Multnoman Post off i re Q7719 with postage prepaid thereon. AgI OA 1 ~• nature New " Subscribed and sworn to before me this AC) day of / tg OFFICIAL SEAL • ' • .1 THOMAS E. HUMP —1 (6 NOTARY PUBLIC • OREOON COMMISSION NO.O12017 No . ' / Y COMMISSION EXPIRES JANA, MO My Commi - .n Expires: �� _ / i , t ' h: \Iog i nVo \atf mai l.cit i 1 • • • July 19, 1994 1"" 2 3_ Mr. Gerald W. Swank. Central CIT Rep. 13805 SW 118th. Court Tigard, OR 97223 RE: BOSTON CHICKEN Northwest Application Dear Interested Party: My company, Jim Griffith & Associates, is representing Boston Chicken Northwest who are interested in developing the property located at 13935 S.W. Pacific Highway. They are interested in developing a Boston Chicken Restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, August 4, 1994 Tigard Grange Hall Basement 13770 S.W. Pacific Highway 7 -9 PM Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at work 293 -0805, or at home 639 -8629, if you have questions. Sincerely James E. Griffith President cc. C. Lind JEG/jeg File: • • • Tigard Grange No. 148 12210 S.W. Summer Crest Dr. Tigard, OR 97223 Empire Enterprises, Inc. 422.Railway St. Vancouver, BC V6A1B1 Resident 13825 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 9722 Lloyd Gilbertson 15980 S.W. Colony Place Tigard, OR 97224 Resident 13765 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 13855 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 Prudence M. Miller 4220 S.W. Greenleaf Drive Portland, OR 97221 City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10920 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Norman and Patricia Ottoman 21635 S.W. Elwert Road Sherwood, OR 97140 Resident 10910 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Bebe E. Dill 10900 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 George and Carolyn Sheldon 123 N.W. 2nd Portland, OR 97209 Resident 10890 S.W. Garden Park P1. • Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Margeaux C. Rubio 2028 Grahn Dr. Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Resident 10840 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Genevieve M. Ward 16030 S.W. Wimbledon Ct. Tigard, OR 97224 Resident 10830 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Herbert and Grace Tindall 10820A S.W. Garden Park Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10820 S.W. Garden Park Pl. Tigard, OR 97223 Phillip and Barbara Kelleher P.O. Box 23023 Tigard, OR 97281 Resident 10810 S.W. Garden Park Pl. Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10800 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10790 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10780 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Thomas and Cynthia Mulflur 4535 S.W. Tarlow Ct. Portland, OR 97221 • • Resident 10770 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10760 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Randolph and Leann Glahn 10750 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Randy Gray 10740 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 David and Teresa Gooley 4625 S.W. 42nd Pl. Portland, OR 97221 Resident 10730 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10720 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10710 S.W. Garden Park Pl. Tigard, OR 97223 Resident 10700 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Harol and Clara Holmes 5455 Regent St., W. Tillamook, OR 97141 Resident 10690 S.W. Garden Park P1. Tigard, OR 97223 Phillip Kellerher 17690 S.W. Shawnee Trail Tualatin, OR 97062 Bruce Miller 9255 S.W. 3rd Portland, OR 97219 Resident 10825 S.W. Garden Park Pl. • • Tigard, OR 97223 Richard and Jacqueline Roberts 10495 S.W. 135th Beaverton, OR .97005 Dana Brothers Properties 9800 S.E. Stark Portland, OR 97216 Gerald Swank 13805 S.W. 118th Ct. Tigard, OR 97223 Bill Mitchell 13380 S.W. Ash Tigard, OR 97223 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Community Development 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 .• . • io CITY OF TIGARD • PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON - RE SIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT /�,� �/� DATE: 2 - 9q STAFF: v 4 ' , �"^ Q, APPLICANT: 65 (3l/l � �.IJ f l' it AGENT: �1 L✓1 6 A 6 'vA L..Qt.CGI e e: - 7C3 -- (3 vockkozy Phone: ( - ze'3 — ORds 5D -d66 PROPERTY LOCATION: '< e � Lei Address: Tax Map & Tax Lot: 2 5/4 (7f) / fix feJf / ge) - • NECESSARY APPLICATION (S) : < P ' •&Vr Q O Z?4 at . G PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Ri.citid et - 3 0S6 S d 2 C3'$•V7 1 il ea u /lam - i, , . a r � I l . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: c2 6 C1`eh'ev�2 1 vLt 1�, e v).4 ZONING DESIGNATION: (�( ^C� / C�P/Lt�vti9 j ��'S� fru1i1.vi i-iiL( CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM •��t1 v Q 1 CHAIRPERSON: 6 -2✓•a /6 5- -c --' PHONE: Z 9- 66/5`"7 ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: Ple. u e sq. ft. C/�¢.� r i�t a ' � #Gt/4& ( - �ie � �v� �i3 ft. •� - lot width: � �' �.�5 f We_ < c am! fbr. / Setbacks: front ou ft. side ft. m rear - 2 ft. garage /A ft. corner,/ g ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: / __fa S $ Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: % Maximum building height: '- &S' ft. ADDITIONAL LOT D SIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot tags: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition proce . • Lots created as part of a partition must have a • minlinum of • 15 fee of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width atio of 2.5 to 1. • SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: • - 5C.; ft. ft m centerline of S -co ,/ Established areas: ft. from 2-7A • Lower intensity zones: - ft. , along, the site's - .R • boundary ,. • ' BDILDIFG ffiGHT PILO�VISI0NS Building Height -- • ...:. (Code 18.98.020): _Buildings' located in . • a non - residential zone ma. •: • built :.to :a• height . of -75:feet .. 1. A maximum FAR (• ding •.floor : area to -site area ratio) of .1.5 . • to 1 will midst; ;:..- :.: : - - _ - 2. - All actual • bull • • :- setbacks ; Will.' be at - least 1/2 the :. • • . building's height; _ ; d ; _ =`: = '^ • _ • .; _ : • 3. The structure will no abut a residential zone district. Page 1 - • • •e.i� 4 �v w . , f PARKING AND ACCESS I , / � ''',r 2 " /o - Required parking for this type of use: / _. ,��:^ Secondary use required parking: a I lir No more than LB?5% of required spaces may .: designated�a d/ sioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: - Standard parking space dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. �--•- Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft. Disabled parking: All parking areas shall provide app '•. hoc ed and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ■• Bicycle racks are required for civic, non - residential, commercial and industrial developments which provide 15 or more parking spaces. Bicycle. racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every 15 vehicular parking spaces. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage areas, must be paved. D . Drive -in use queuing areas: &0 o' of c _--1..... ...I Al lei C` l Minimum number of accesses: x ,.,, phAc ao2, Minimum access width: 24 feet Max ' ,..- e a - width: 40 feet Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets . --!_ "inimum of one tree for eves seven- parking spaces musETbe planted in i and around all parking areas in. order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108. . . « VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road - intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. 4 '4 --- _ d/fr 1-e . 6,1) °e‘-d. .. Page 2 • • BUFFERING AND SCREENING - In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100. ired buffer widths which are applicab a to your proposal area: �4 i ft. along north boundary ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary ft_ along west boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along STREET TREES Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private property within six feet of the right- of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 • feet apart depending on the branching width of the tree at maturity. • Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Div -. watt -" - - �' - SIGNS Sign permits must be obtain-. •• tot tn_ipstal ation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A 'Guidelines for Sign Permits' handout is available u • request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. SENSITIVE li. Code Chapter 18.84 .. -: regulations. for lends which are potentially unsuitable for •- - ••. dae to areas within the 100 -year floodplain, • natural drai nageways, . - - ... areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. • • will . attempt ; : to .preliminarily : _identify _ .. - sensitive lands areas at the : — • • lication conference based on available information. BOWEVER,)the respons • ility to precisely identify sensitive =.': lands areas, and their boundaries; •e responsibility of the applicant. . Areas meeting the definitions of sensitise lands must be clearly indicated • on plans submitted with the development application_ -. • • Page 3 • • • • . . • • Chapter 18.84 also provides lations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands s. In most cases, dedication of 100 - year floodplain areas to the City for park and open apace areas is required as a condition of the appzo of a development application. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS 4- y-i-wp,/,_ ,y,d 4,,u7 be , vl. 0 1-frt . e s al -'e�'- v-vrs I'-ow S uJ 1�� J 6' 4 i - ' g ikitly r - 6?--) 4 lu) ,, - /4,9's1....: •m �ye,v <'- pc, teie_ i,ie � �.. tic - , AI . . E PROCEDUR (, / Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.H. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the 1 following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.H. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will preform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision or public bearing will typically occur approximately 4S . to 60 . days after an application -is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. -. Applications involving: difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. - - Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public. hearing. A'10 day public appeal period follows all-1 use Q on this - matter would be heard by the ' - ° f / f / 1v/4 k ;al -s . - - - 8 basic flow chart which illustrates the revierprocess is available fro - 0 the Planning Division � is � u - -. _ / - - - - _ . 0 - rite �/ 1i1 0 y l / 20 n : D amtcfruG� ,LA/c.5 E ve,v,va � - 4 At e- cla e. / 6 c«ti g -e:CS o�i &p o &/mss- �cdv► . e 0 6U f l A "cY � N Igo- ire? �.ka aic 44ce / LuNe.s evc, eoi - �- a, ,f ,,,, �^ �, , p too 4n"cc ( ,x of -hts O 1 °1 - ? ar tt J 6ee ! ?/� l • • This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre - application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre - application conference, unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. i PREPARED BY: r ,AM. PLANNING DIVISI• © PHONES 639 -4171 0A-u Ci_fr( dil s t - e__ 441 i jit V.J2_ , Add h max/ de1G6es7Jc, ©21 q(? friA ten. k 4 C- a ae. — • Page 5 • . PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre application conference is to: (1) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (2) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (3) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right -of -way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: 1) to increase abutting public rights - of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right -of -way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or 2) for the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will requir ri ht-of- way dedication for: Ft7S$�,i?�, mss`). er p�-�t �� ��/ GG` a�T 1 . IV.tel ^G //'!/(Jr to feet from centerline. 2. to feet from centerline. 3. to feet from centerline. Street improvements: "77�cL d /f uct ' - -" f �` -• �G l��ZirY //01,0. to/77i _ p� � �� 1. /G street improvements will be necessary along 2. street improvements will be necessary alozig 3. Street improvements shall include . feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility Wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five -foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or Lathe Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be . deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non - remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of.a local improvement district formed to improve: 1. 2. Page 6 • • Pedestrianways /bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) 0 inch line which is located in The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's 0X'7X /fMA./ lb S/T -,147 p:ttoe4/ze Water Supply: The Tigard•Water D(Phone: 639 -1554) Valley-Watr (hone: - 642 -1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 645 -8533) provides fire protection services'within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. 1 , Y 4 17-12e- Other Agency Permits: storm sewer improvements: /)f`rY Aezfaftee c5xT. / /le/k kliey • STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on -site water quality facilities. At the • discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility and/or the payment of a fee.. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. O4 $77& 41 - 7 'e /,-,ir y • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county -wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic' Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the developments projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based . upon the number of trips which are projected to result - from the proposed development. The calculation of•the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land,. the size of the.. project,: -and a general:•use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated 'at the ;time Of building permit issuance. In - limited circumstances, payment:of:the may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an _occupancy- permit: Deferral of .the payment until • occupancy is permissible only when .the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. • • T Page 7 , '5o ca bo 7r/ X ”/ 4/ / 2 / D/2 • • STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right -of -way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: f; 41-6 44 8 7 %.4- " ' ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: 639 -4171 • • • • • • • t RP:preapnon = • Page 8 . • II • _ , EXHIBIT 'A' . APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission _ . $235.00 costs Planning Commission /Hearings Off_ to Council . $315.00 + transcript BLASTING PERMITS $125_00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING Text only, Map only, or both $675.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING Conditional Use Review $365.00 . FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS $ 80.00 • HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT $ 80.00 HOLD: OCCUPATION tea..:.. P m it $ 50.00 TYPeIt . •Renewal $ 10 _ 00/year - j'fl' INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE . . . $ 55.00 by Community Development Department LAND PARTITION Residential and Non- residential $235.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • $50_00 • . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Conceptual and detailed plan review $500_00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood plain $520.00 Wetlands /Steep slopes /Drainageway $235.00 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS $230.00 SIGN PERMIT 0 -24 sq. ft. $ 10_00 . 24 -100 sq. ft. $ 25.00 . 100 + sq. ft $ 35.00 Z1r 5 ELgas $ 10.00 each sign _ SITE DEVELOPMENT ' Under $10,000 $ 80.00 $ 10,000 - $ 99,999 $155.00 $ 100,000 - $499,999 $315_00 $ 500,000.- $999,999 $415.00 $1,000,000 or more $520_00 + $1 per $10,000 over $1 million not to exceed $2000. SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY .- ��.� Subdivision Variance if needed $105_00 - • TEMPORARY USE Director' Decision . $ 50.00 . Special exemption/Non- Profit . . - . . - . . $ -0- TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - $ -0- - VACATIONS Streets and public access $300.00 deposit - actual costs charged . VARIANCE Administrative $80.00 . Sign Code $230.00 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS - : _ _ . " Less than 10 acres $520 ... 10 acres or more - $625.00 ZONE CHARGE PROCESSING "" Less than 10 acres " . . $520.001 , _. . ` -.;; c:.. .", - .• _ . 10 acres or more - - - _ . $625.00,;::. _ ;" - • • ZONE ORDINANCE ANEZIDNENT • . _ - ' $310 ` .. ' " - - " • JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING ME I:: ...". 100% of highest planning _. -:• -. =.. fee plus 10% of all additional - planning fees related to the proposal. " br /Resl.ksl - . .':- . -. - - Afirgs›.12 1.9 . a ... . - • Faxti/c Off / Staff A 1 , s 7 7 .,, Date CITY OF TZGARO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639 -4171. ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) [,L3 8) Owner's signature /written authorization [6]/ C) Title transfer instrument • [45/ D) Assessor's map (Q / E) Plot or site plan [`(]----- F) Applicant's statement [– (H) Filing fee .($ ) ... 'Ii a�E� [x -- SPECIFIC MATERIALS �6 6 d --c (/`t u � A) . Site Information showing (No. of copies /1: [13--- 1) Vicinity Map _ [0,—_ - 2) Site size & dimensions ct)------- • 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) ,c-4==.7.:____ 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [ 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: _ a) Floodplain areas b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ -A c) Unstable ground Err- d) Areas with high seasonal water table [j'.]- e) Areas with severe scil erosion.potential l '7 f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils 6). Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive - Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats • - . b) Wetlands • (�/ 7) Other site features: / a) Rock outcroppings ' • ,; ( b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level :_ - [ '8) location of existing- :structures and their uses - C . 9) Location and type -of - on and off -site noise' sources - - 10) Location of existing:utilities and easements [ �] 11) Location of existing: _dedicated right -of - ways' - [ . _ _ . ...7- 8) . Site Development Plan showi (No.-_ of copies 1< ') . ' [ ' 1) The proposesite and= surrouri d:_ ding properties:. ... : _ yi :... :: • - 2) Contour line intervals = -. - . - _ _ [ 3) The location; dimensions and names of all:'..; a) Existing -.& platted streets & other public ways and easements on.the site-and on adjoining - [ properties . ... .., APPLICATION CHECKLIST – Page 1 ' • 1111 1111 b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. [ // • c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed I[X streets that require future extension 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [�]� b) Parking and circulation areas c) Loading and services areas r`Jr d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, [4.3-_ f) Above ground utilities [`] -" 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [ b) Proposed structures, improvements, • utilities and easements on the site , 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7) Sanitary Sanitary sewer facilities [ c]� 8) The location of areas to be landscaped [�]� 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [ • �. 10) The location of mailboxes [c�- 11) The location of all structures and their orientation [�1 • 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [c� C) Grading Plan (No. of copies • The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. • 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: • a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical • engineering report • [ 4- b) The validity of•sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals . c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated : 0) Architectural Drawings (No.= : of copies 1- • -,_ -: [ l� - The site development plan proposal -shall include: • 1) . Floor plans indicating the square footage-of all • structures proposed use : on -site; and - :7:: [ G . • 2)- ,Typical elevation drawings-of. -each - structure . [ - E) Landscape Plan (Ho. of copies / - [ g� The landscape plan:shall be- drawrn thesame scale of the site analysis planer a larger scale if necessary and shall • indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where. applicable [ 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings ( APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 2 - • • 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces [ • 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. [ �� 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. F)_ Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ � G) Traffic generation estimate [ 3 H) Prelimina .___` ition or lot line ad'ustment ma. showi - (No. of Copies ): 1) The owner o the subject parcel [ 3 2) The owner's .uthorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north arrow and dat- [ 3 4) Description of . rcel location and boundaries I ] 5) Location, width a - names of streets,.easements and • other public ways ithin and adjacent to the parcel [ ] • 6) Location of all pe -nt buildings on and within 25 feet of all prope y lines [ ] 7) Location and width of 1 water courses [ ] 8) Location of any trees wi.h or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground leve [ 3 9) All slopes greater than 25% [ ] 10) Location of existing utilitie, and utility easements [ ] 11) For major land partition which reates a public street: a) The proposed right - of-way 1. . tion and width C 3 b) A scaled cross — section of the .roposed street plus any reserve strip 1 3 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ 3 13) Evidence that land partition will not p efficient future future land division where app 'cable [ 3 I) Subdi Prelimina .Plat and data showi -(No. of Copies • 1) Scat= equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and "mited to -one phase per•sheet [ ] •2) The pro..sed name.of the subdivision .[ 3 . 3) Vicinity showing property's relationship to arterial ....collector streets - [ ] 4) Names, addres • s and - : telephone .numbers of the owner developer, eng •r,- •surveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of applicati• - [ 3 6) Boundary. lines of-=. • :to be • _ 7) Names of adjacentf.su vision. or. names of recorded... • owners of adjoining is ofunsubdivided land • [ ] 8) Contour lines related. :to ;aCity - established bench- mark at 2- foot - intervals f .0-10% grades greater than 107. [ 3 APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 3 • - • • • 9) The purpose, location, type and size of all of the followi, (within and adjacent to the proposed . subdivi -ion): [ ] a) Pub c and private right -of -ways and easements [ ] b) Pub ki. and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ ] c) Dome t'c water mains including fire hydrants [ ] d) Major • telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) [ ] e) Watercour • es C ] f) Deed rese ations for parks, open space, pathways - and other and encumbrances [ ] 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and - storm sewers wit, grades and pipe sizes indicated C ] 11) Plan of the propo -- • water distribution system, showing pipe size - and the location of valves and . fire hydrants. [ ] 12) Approximate centerli e profiles showing the finished grade of all street including street extensions for a reasonable distance '.-yond the limits of the proposed subdivision. [ ] • 13) Scaled cross sections o. proposed street right -of -way; [ ] 14) The location of all area subject to inundation or storm water overflow . [ ] 15) Location, width and direc on of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways [ ] 16) The proposed lot configurat , ons, approximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where losts are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots [ ] 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet abo.e ground level, and the location of proposed tree p antings, if any [ ] 18) The existing uses the propert including the location of all structures and t e present uses of • the structures, and a statement o which structures are to remain after platting C ] 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if . y) C ] b) Proof of property ownership C ] c) A proposed plan for provision of bdivision improvements • C ] 20) Existing natural features including rock'. t . • croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. C ] - 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot • .cticably - be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall • - incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the • application. - - J . -- 7) Other Information CZ3-'-. (2362P/OO28P) cLe 1 �� 3 G / � 17,. c� - -- 'i s9 pus ° f4 C° � l daC4 . 4. APPLICATION CHECKLIST e D� 1 `r-e. `:5 , . • ALL APPLIGTIOl - • BOTIFICATIO LI67 Fit O II !( 1_ RP0 R0. (2) copies CPO A0. 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS Building Official/Dave 8. Parks i Recreation Board City Recorder Police Engineering /Chris D. Field Operations _,_ Permits Facilitator/Viola C. • 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS __ Fire District (Pick -up box) School Dist Bo. 48 (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 Tigard Water District School Dist. 21J 8777 SW Burnhas St. (Tigard) Tigard, OR 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. _. Unified Sewerage Agency /Swm Program Tigard, OR 97223 155 N. First St. Hillsboro, OR 97124 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Masi Tramp. 150 N. First Ave. -- teary Stark Rom Hillsboro, OR 97124 320 la Stank Roos 530 Brent Curtis Portland, OR 97204 Kevin Martin Mike Borrason —_ METRO - GREE6SPACES PROGRAM Scott King Mel Bale (CPA's/EOM.) Fred Eberle 600 FE Grand Portland, OR 97232 -2736 _ City of Beaverton _ DLL (CPA's /zo •a) Jia Hsndryx - Principal Planner Sa OR t St PO Box 4755. OR Beaverton, OR 97076 Other • -- City o Inumwrar f City City of Durban City 15300 SW 116th P Box 23483 -3483 Sing City, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 — City of Lake Oswego Cilbuump 380 SW er Planning Director l Lake Oswego, OR 97034 1120 SW Sth Portland, OR 97204 ? State Highway Division COOT Bob Doran PO Box 25412 Lldvien Rahaeaa Portland, OR 97225 -0412 9002 SE e,OR Blvd. Mllwanhle, OR 97222 —_ City of Tualatin PO Box 369 • • Tualatin, OR 97062 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES Cameral Telephone Engineering Portland General Elec. P02�� Brian Moore Tigard, OR 97281 -3416 14655 SM , O 8choll Fr7. Beaverton, OR 97007 SW 'natural Cas Scott Palmer Metro Area OoOaai �t 220 NW 8s000d a w T Hewitt Twin Oaks Technology Canter Portland. OR 97209 Twin 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Mike ablla�cu1 of Oregon ' OR 97006 -4886 US West ../ 3500 SW Bond at. Pete Nalaaa Portland, OR 97201 421 811 Oak St. e Oo'enbla Cable (Fran! Staoa) . :_ Portland, OR 97204' 14200 w/ Bri944000 Ct. - - .�, - = Tri Transit Dw. . Beaverton, OR 97005 Elm 6. STATE AGENCIES 4012 SE 17th Ave. Aeronautics Div. (OpOT) s< -- Portland, OR 97202 - POC Dept. of Eavirvo. Quality _ _ : - -" _ _ . 7 - F8D8AAL AG8ltCI88 • Carps. of Engineers :. Post Office 8. OTHER Southern Pacific T e sportatioo Mspany Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer • 8Porrtl�andd, 6th Avenue, n R. 324, Union STaCto • • III . ... . . Staff Date Q G IIII CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST • The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your ' application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639 -4171. ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) (3l 8) Owner's signature/written authorization [f]/ C) Title transfer instrument • [ 0) Assessor's map ( � E) Plot or site plant F) Applicant's statement [— (H) Filing fee (S r - ) • .p - -� (43-------- SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) . Site Information showing (No. of copies /h: ([.)� 411 1) Vicinity Map .. [d __ 2) Site size & dimensions [ f , 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [ • 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas [ I b) Slopes in excess of 25% (--3- - c) Unstable ground [r],--- d) Areas with high seasonal water table [Fj — e) Areas with severe scil erosion. potential l'i f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive • Map inventory including: . a) Wildlife habitats - VA;; . b) Wetlands 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings .. [A b) Trees with 6' + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level _: [ _ g'. - 8) Location of existins '- -' tructures and their uses - [ �l .- 9) Location and type. of on and off -site noise' sources ( .�' - - 10) Location of existing:•ut�iilities and easements.. . [ ' 11) Location of existing_ dedicated right-of-ways [¢. Y _ . 111= == 8) Site Development Plasi'showinq (No:~ of copies,`): _ - .. [(t : ' ' ' .. 1) The proposed:.site and'-surrounding properties!..—.--..., - • - 2) Contour line intervals = :�' :.. ---:--.- ,: . _ , : - [ . 3) The location, dimensions and names of all:'.. a) Existing.& platted streets & other public ways and easements on.the site.and on adjoining • [ - properties . .- . -..' .. .. APPLICATION CHECKLIST — Page 1 - • • • b) Proposed streets or other public ways b easements 4114 on the site. ( c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed �X streets that require future extension 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site b) Parking and circulation areas c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities [�- 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [ b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site . L]/ 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions Et�� 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques - [ 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements (43-- • _ C) Grading Plan (No. of copies , [ 1� The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: • 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. Ca_- 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: - a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report [ c]-- -- b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals c) That all problems will be mitigated and �+ how they will be mitigated 0) Architectural Drawings (No. of L� • The site development plan proposal -shall =include: . 1) . Floor plans indicating the square footage•of all structures proposed - for use. on -site; and :=. • [ � 2) - Typical elevation drawings -of -each - structure. . .:. a - E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies_: - The landscape plan shall be. drawn at the same • scale of: the . :� �? : • • • site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and - shall - _ - • •. indicate: .. - 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [ 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings [L3� APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 2 • • • 3) Location of terraces decks, shelters, play areas and common open spa 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. [ y� The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. F). Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or • prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ �� G) Traffic generation estimate [ 3 H) Prelimina •_._.i ition or lot line ad'ustment ma• showi (No. of Copies ): 1) The owner o the subject parcel [ ] 2) The owner's •uthorized agent ( ] _ 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north - arrow and dat- ( ] 4) Description of -rcel location and boundaries ( ] 5) Location, width - • names of streets,.easements and other public ways .ithin and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all pe -nt buildings on and within 25 feet of all prope y lines [ ] 7) Location and width of - 1 water courses ( ] • 8) Location of any trees wi - 6" or greater caliper at 4.feet above ground leve [ ] 9) All slopes greater than 25% [ 3 10) Location of existing utilitie and utility easements [ ] 11) For major land partition which reates a public street: a) The proposed right-of-way 1. - tion and width [ 3 b) A scaled cross - section of the • roposed street plus any reserve strip [ 3 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ 3 13) Evidence that land partition will not p =clude efficient future land division where app 'cable [ 3 I) Subdivi. ion Prelimina Plat -• and data showi •(No. of Copies 1) Scat= equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch ' and "sited to one phase per sheet [ ] 2) The pro • • sed name of the subdivision s -[ 3 . 3) Vicinity showing property's relationship to arterial - •collector streets • 4) Names, addres :s arid - _telephone numbers of the owner developer, eng surveyer, as applicable( ] 5) Date of applicati• = [ ] . 6) Boundary lines of to be.•subdivided .: . . [ ] • . - _ 7) Names of adjacent : - su • • j , ision . or . names of recorded. . - . owners of adjoining • - • is of unsubdivided land [ ] . ..: =. • 410 8) Contour lines related: to : - a City - established bench mark at 2 -foot. intervals f. -0-10% grades greater than 1011 [ APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 3 - • • 9) The purpose, location, type and size of all of the followi • (within and adjacent to the proposed III subdivision): [ ] a ) Pub c and private right -of -ways and easements [ ] b) Pub i and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ ] c) t'c water mains including fire hydrants [ ] d) Major -r telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) [ ] e) Watercou es [ ] f) Deed rese ations for parks, open space, pathways - and other and encumbrances [ ] 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and • - storm sewers wi , grades and pipe sizes indicated [ ] 11) Plan of the propo water distribution system, showing pipe size and the location of valves and fire hydrants. [ ] 12) Approximate centerli a profiles showing the finished grade of all street- including street extensions for a reasonable distance •-yond the limits of the proposed subdivision. - [ ] 13) Scaled cross sections o proposed street right -of -way; [ ] 14) The location of all area subject to inundation or storm water overflow [ ] 15) location, width and direc on of flow of all water- = courses and drainage ways [ ] 16) The proposed lot configurat .ons, approx mate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be • . indicated upon such lots [ ] 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet abo e ground level, and the location of proposed tree • antings, if any [ 3 18) The existing uses the propert including the • location of all structures and t'e present uses of the structures, and a statement o which structures are to remain after platting C ] 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if • y) [ ] b) Proof of property ownership C ] c) A proposed plan for provision of bdivision improvements • C ] 20) Existing natural features including rock • — croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. - [ ] - 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot • • 'cably - be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall - - . incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the • application. - 7) _Other Information . . .. . (13- - 0 (2362P/OO28P) 6 CZ:e6S v) k�,i G, ; . t e6 . - - Gr#1v) - c� Lie/ heed- • � F s� �� Ge � a� Gc vie 4-r. lev¢�it� c,� �� APPLICATION CHECKLI e D 15' . ._ . . ... 111 • :. 1. ■OrIPICATIOn LIST POR ALL APPLICATIORS aPO so. (2) copies CPO NO. 2. CITY DEpA( g • Building Official/Dave S. Perks ir+sstion Board City Recorder Field Engineering /Chris D. Operations Permits Facilitator/Viola C. 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS __ Fire District (Pick -up box) — Dist ao. 48 (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 __ m Tigard Mater District 237 8777 SW Bobes St. Tigard OR 97223 13137 SM Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 6501 tin ter District Unified Agency/ SW Tigard, Taylors OR 97223 Fa� __ Rd. 155 K. First St. . P Hillsboro, OR 97124 4. AFFECT JURLSDICTIO1S Wash. Co. Land U.4 Trensp. 150 K. First Ave. 32 Boundary �saion Hillsboro, OR 97124 Star![ Roos 530 Brent Curtis Portland, OR 97204 Kevin Martin _ miles Borrasca Fred 600 Ho Cre d ACES ZOA's . Scott Xing Portland, OR 97232 -2736 City of Beaverton DLCD (CPA's /DOA•.) SE Jim Heodryx Principal Planner 1175- Court St. 0- PO Box 4755. OR 97310-0590 Beaverton, OR 97076 — Other City °ofK City City of Durham 15300 SW 116th PO City Box 23483-3483 Sing City, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 II -- C M _ City of Portland 380 St/ A Planning Director Lake Oswego, OR 97034 1120 SW 5th Portland, OR 97204 P'. State Highway Division COOT _ Bob Doran PO Box 25412 LidWdsn Rebmann 9002 SE McLoughlin Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Milwakia 21vd. City of Tualatin PO Box 369 5. SPSCTAL �S Tualatin, OR 97062 General Telephone Portland PO Box Office Brien Moore fie. Tigard. OR 97201 -3416 B Bsaverton, OR 97007 XV Natural Gas Scott Palmer Metro Area Coemzsni -=ti m 220 iM Second Ave. Jason Bw.itt Portland, OR 97209 lS�IS Oaks � � Capi of O regon Beaverton, OR 97006.4886 Mike r 3500 SW Bond St. OS Wert Portland, CR 97201 - Pete Nelson 421 SW Oak St. e Oo a Cable «k Sows) Portland, OR 97204 14200 > 0� ooh Ct. Sows) -.-:- - Tri -Met Transit Dsv. • • Zia Knox 6. =NC= 4012 Sk 17th awe. D (COOT) . - OR 97202 _ - . Division of flab i Mil f� K.R. laslk. :7 _ ::: O Dept. - - - - - - • - - -; pt. of avid. Quality �t _ -:•.. _- :µii_::. •' • Post o ost �nMta . Office S. Old Southern Pacific Transportation Company Doane it. ego 1111 I 6th Avenue, Pus - Project iSog Portland, OR 97209 R. 324, Union Station • • 411 • PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre - application conference is to: (1) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (2) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (3) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an. opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public be required improvement related requirements that may equi -red as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right -of -way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: = to increase abutting public rights -of -way to the ultimate functional street classification right -of -way width as specified by the Coantunity Development Code; or 2) for the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will requir ri ht-of way dedication for: ,�a � _s`7)f 7 PEA �` / Y o/r41 1. r� / ^� /Air to OAT feet from centerline. • 2. - to feet from centerline. 3. to �j� fe ee et from centerline. Street improvements: reap - i i �L vet /AY /m.o. W in/ ..0,1.7a" 1. h. street improvements will be necessary along Imo/ «1G 2. street improvements will be necessary along 3. Street improvements shall include , feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five-foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public Improvements are not currently practical, the street - improvements may be . deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non - remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of .a local improvement district formed to improve: 1. • 2. Page 6 • • Pedestr ianways /bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) el inch line -which is located in 67t5 n The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's X7? *.9 /nAIA/ IT • izapaac Water Supply: The Tigard-Water Dist '(Phone: 639 -1554) Ualrley-Watr * hone:642 -1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene !Urchin, 645 -8533) provides fire protection services. within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. v e/.Y W�� rexe- 4 t Other Agency Permits: Storm sewer improvements: /0,1Y JLf p!/// a T. /Ai P4 ttly STORMWATER QUALITY FEES • The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on -site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility and/or the payment of a fee.. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. s /Tl&r 14.41-702_ 2_ . / �7� TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based . upon the number of trips which are to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project,--and a general - use based fee category. •. " The TIF shall be calculated 'at the•time of building permit issuance. In - limited circumstances, payment- of the . TIP may be . allowed to be deferred • until the issuance of an occ paacy: permit:" . Deferral of the payment until - . occupancy is permissible only when . the_ TIF is greater than $5,000.00. ' • P4-)' e57 Page 7 ,A50 / /Op -X/ • STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right -of -way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opeiiing permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall S vdirate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY: ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: 639 -4171 • • RP.preapaou - - • Page 8 . - ID . • EXHIBIT - A' . .._.. ...„ . ,, APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission - - $235.00 costs Planning Commission/Hearings Off. to Council . $315_00 + transcript BLASTING PERMITS $125.00 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING Text only, Hap only, or both S675.00 _ CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING Conditional Use Review $365.00 . FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS $ 80.00 . HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT $ 80.00 HOME OCCUPATION Geiginal-PeemIt $ 50_00 - TYPalE • anaecml $ 10_00frear WI INTERPRETATION OF COl407NT1'Y OEVEf.OE'H T CODE _ $ 55.00 by Community Development Department LAND PARTITION Residential and Non- residential $235.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • $50.00 - • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Conceptual detailed plan review $500.00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood plain $520.00 Wetlands /Steep slopes /Drainageway $235 - " - SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS _ $230.00 SIGN PERMIT . 0 -24 sq. ft.- $ 10_00 . 24 -100 sq. ft_ $ 25.00 • 100 + sq. ft $ 35.00 ' Tp,�pQ1 .g s $ 10.00 each sign 40,--- SITE DEVEI.OPME NT a =1M_ - Under $10,000 $ 80_00 -- ` $ 10,000 - $ 99,999 $155_00 �,. $ 10 - $499,999 $315.00 _ S 500,000.- $999,999 $415 -00 $1,000,000 or 'more $520_00 + $1 per $10,000 over $1 million not to exceed $2000. SUBD PRELIMINARY P ---- -�-�-� . Subdivision Variance, if needed - $105.0 TEMPORARY USE Director' Decision _ $ 50 -00 - Special exemption/Non- Profit _ _ - _ - - - _ - $ -0- TREE Rf• VAL PERtMIT - - $ -0- - - - VACATIONS - Streets and public access $300_00 deposit - actual - costs wed . VARIANCE - Administrative $80_00 'f Sign Code $230_00 - - ZONE ( ANNEKATI0ttS - - . _ ' Less than 10 acres - _ $520 -00 . 10 acres or more _ _ _ _ -. $625 - ZONE CHANCE PROCESSING - -_ c v _. _ _ - Less than. 10 acres - _ . _ •` _- _ $520_00: . - . - ' 10 acres or more - _ - . - • - - $625_00' C ZONE ORDI ANCE AMEND ENT _ _ _ _. -- .: - - $310_00 - - _ _ •. .• .. . • • JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE ' _ • : :: ::: • _ 1001 of hi _ -- .- �:- fee plus 10t of all additional planning fees related to the proposal_ bt /Resl_ksl . • 4 �c� -�9 • Forti/c x' /41• - • • • • • • CITY OF TIGARD PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE: 2 - 9q STAFF: L 0 6 .44- R � APPLICANT: <> Otit ��.r. nil) i L✓t 6 v-) 1--QC! -Theca: �7�3 : :•o Phone: - -p ?a5 &OAT - 0 6 6 • � vr,do . r:›9 PROPERTY LOCATION: �° i1 �'" g Lei Address: r 3 l 3 S 5 v aG� 1 Lt So Tax Map & Tax Lot: 7.576 O (' X /off OCic'' NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): L .1 e- O / � ! , :� • � PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: u a - 3 OS .. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: K/ 6 vt4 14.„ evrl ZONING DESIGNATION: C ( -( ) C e � e v� f / 4.i fet-tp.t./44 CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM C -- `'''t ( CHAIRPERSON: 6 eva / s 'a, PHONE: 9 - • ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: /.u-e sq. ft. r k,tear 4 v lot width: 1� ft�' � kt �ld�(/ J Setbacks: front ��oa ft. - side ft. rear 2m ft. garage 'Z ft. corner,l� 9 ft. from street. Maximum site coverage. MS'S t Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: �� t Maximum building height: "-IS ft. ADDITIONAL LOT D = -+:+' SIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum i mum lot t • tage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land • partition •.• :_ Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of' 15 fee • of frontage or have a mi ni mum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width atio of 2.5 to 1. • SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: 5-0 ft. from centerline of S W �Q - *.- / Established areas: ft. from 2-1,4 Lower intensity zones: -# ft., • along the site's - '14P boundary BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS . • G� Building Height - : • • . • (Code Section 18.98.020) s -.Buildings located in - • a non - residential zone - • • -- built :_to .a-height of •75: feet provided:: - • 1. A maximum FAR (• • .. -. floor area to - site area ratio) of • 1.5 • to 1 will euist -- = �':� :_ • _ - ••• i :cam .�.� 2. All actual bull • ;•setbacks : will: be :> at least 1/2 the building's height;'.= -'r r - `_ - :.. - _ 3. The structure will • abut a residential - Zone district. -- • Page 1 - - • • • y - 1 .0 I -Q ! ,., vise . :,- II PARKING AND ACCESS f ' 2.__ /01 Required parking for this type of use: � i, ��!' i Secondary use required parking: AC Ar No more than i a of required spaces may designated sioaed as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: - Standard parking space dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. - Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft. Disabled parking: All parking areas shall provide app ' - -- ed (1(1 and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for civic, non - residential, commercial and industrial developments which provide 15 or more parking spaces. Bicycle . racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every 15 vehicular parking spaces. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage areas, must be paved. �_ . Drive-in use queuing areas: la ra 3( — q i 140A k/eo �' ""'G • Minimum number of accesses: /2>3. c:› �) I j ph".., as 2 Minimum access width: 24 feet aft width: 40 feet Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking k areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets_ � . • „ o. one tree for ev : + - - +':. spaces mus €be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the narking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108. - CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained ne between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road • intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. 4 dmivaway v-i S w i4 ._ A7, ID - Page 2 . . _ .. • .. • • • III • BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100. -4---.: } ired buffer widths which are applicab a to your proposal area: aoliik 'i/1 , ft. along north boundary ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary ft. along west boundary � In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along STREET TREES Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private property within six feet of the right - of-way boundary. Street trees must have a mmi i mug+ caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 Z . feet apart depending on the branching width of the tree at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Plana' .g Div .a. - -_. V . - 'Iff:.a_. SIGNS Sign permits must be tion of sign in the City of Tigard. A 'Guidelines for Sign Permits' handout is a e . request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review Application. Alternatively, a Sign code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. . S E N S I T I V E .1. i . -, • - . Code Chapter 18.84 • • >• = regulations for lands which are potentially , : unsuitable for ... - due to areas within the 100 -year floodplain, . natural drainageways,. - .... areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent,. or . • on unstable ground.._ . - - will attempt ; to . preliminarily: identify= .....:.1. - . sensitive lands areas at the : . - . • . • . tion conference based on .available ' ...:-` • information. HOWEVER,. =the - r = ility to precisely identify sensitive : - -- A= • - lands areas, and their boundaries, ie•the responsibility of the applicant .. - :. . III ,Area meeting the definitions of sensiAre lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. • Page 3 • • • • Chapter 18.84 also provides lations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands a. In most cases, dedication of 100 - year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the a of a development application. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS da 4 9 (PC u 1 G7 b e 1�ePr./ dk v`a /t AGV S T'`- /%2( (2 oGvH S 4-47 • SW I n - , �p de �! �Z /, " - iI it i i �_ g" l f • r • - PC- ) ,1yPl v ' PC. 4e-. t-ie\ beef ••• / 1 034 - l� 0. PROCEDURE J V Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. • • • Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. • An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. • APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at • the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without • Planning 'Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.K. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3 :00 P.K. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. .Kaps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. • Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will preform a preliminary review of the application and - will ; determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information on or additional copies of the submitted materials are needed. • The administrative decision, or public 'hearing will typically occur approximately 45 . to 60 - days after , an application .is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division.- Ap 3 ications involving :difficult or • protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may tabu additional time. to review.- - -- Written recommendations from the Planning • staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public. hearing. •A•'10 day - _ public appeal period follows 'all . use .. ; . 4a appeal on . this . • matter would be heard by the : - / � 1444 ��imt s lit A basic flow chart which illustrates the revie process is available free . • the - •Planning Division upon request...-: • 00 "Vie lir t v el 20 4 d 6 acts p v ) 4 4 / � ec1ds C9 '7 s f ff ' � B A s e Pau I1' L1 �eQ a•`a� e. GIN `' / .. /. n� • This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre - application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre - application conference, unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: PLANNING DIVISI• /� PHONE: 639-4171 (it w 4t,► S S't t e( S `k L �' 4 o u� Jr i ✓1L 4 ✓L . • � / GH MAUI 40 fri GIPI ve —V4" -u l c Y • Page 5 • : . : • I I [•• i 1 e• 1. • '..I 'III. ... 1 ...• ' if. • i....../.1..:-:•• 1 '.....• 'II '. •• ••• .. • • . • .. .• • /III. • •S• ••' . • q,„/..... • • . ...,,, , r • ....... . • 4 .4 .. •• • r ..... 4 .1 A �£ ...VII x. . I .. \ . : • I . . ' V . • .. . . VI,,,,, 14.. k‘,.) •• •• . - •'x . / . i • ,,,....• tyr),,,,,,. •• ••••• x... • • • • k • • • • } • • • r x x..:: z .. • • • . 1 " . 7 • i - 1 • :. . • 0. •• I. 3 . 1., , .. . _4 .. . s , .„,...„ :.. 1 ' f • • • • •' - r. '41 '4— 6 • p • dr. '1.`".'.11••• ., • H d S Y < r'r • ::x:• qj x i x°x gg . r 1 , ::, fix 9 2. • i • ---7 ${ x v "4-. .• . i •• i • ♦ 3: ,•'•••',,..;•r ` 5 A is • ,,.. >....w.. ....www...w. .xw. t • . i r" - 251 2S103DD -00600 • 2S103DD -0070 TIGARD GRANGE NO. 148 GILBERTSON, LLOYD BY HENRY METZENTINE DARLENE J 12210 SW SUMMERCREST 15980 SW COLONY PLACE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -00800 2S103DD -01100 EMPIRE ENTERPRISES INC JEFFERY, HARRY E /JUDITH A ATTN: YANG -JUN SHIN BY CHRISTIAN GIFT CENTER 422 RAILWAY STREET 13975 SW PACIFIC HWY STE A VANCOUVER, BC TIGARD OR 97223 CANADA V6A 1B1 2S103DD -01200 2S103DD -01201 LUTHER, W V WINNIE M MILLER, PRUDENCE M BY: L P BUSCH INC 4220 SW GREENLEAF DRIVE 2624 PACIFIC AVE PORTLAND OR 97221 FOREST GROVE OR 97116 2S103DD -01000 2S103DD -02400 ROSSI, ALDO TIGARD, CITY OF % COOPER, RICHARD A 13125 SW HALL 13935 SW PACIFIC HWY PO BOX 23397 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -02500 25103DD -02600 OTTOMAN, PATRICIA A & NORMAN R DILL, BEBE E 21635 SW ELWELT RD 10900 SW GARDEN PARK PL SHERWOOD OR 97140 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -02700 2S103DD -02800 SHELDON, GEORGE & CAROLYN MULFLUR, THOMAS E & CYNTHIA R 123 NW 2ND AVE 4534 SW TARLOW CT PORTLAND OR 97209 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S103DD -02900 2S103DD -03000 TIGARD, CITY OF GARDDE PARK 13125 SW HALL OWNERS OF ALL LOTS PO BOX 23397 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -03100 2S103DD -03200 RUBIO, MARGEAUX C WARD, GENEVIEVE M 2028 GRAHN DR 16030 SW WIMBLEDON CT SANTA ROSA CA 95404 TIGARD OR 97224 2S103DD -03300 2S103DD -03400 TINDALL, HERBERT G & GRACE A KELLEHER, PHILLIP M & BARBARA J 10820A & 10820B SW GARDEN PARK PO BOX 23023 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -03500 2S103DD -03600 KELLEHER, PHILLIP M & BARBARA J KELLEHER, PHILLIP M & BARBARA J PO BOX 23023 PO BOX 23023 TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -03700 • 2S103DD -0380• KELLEHER, PHILLIP M & BARBARA J MULFLUR, THOMAS E & CYNTHIA R PO BOX 23023 4535 SW TARLOW CT TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S103DD -03900 2S103DD -04000 MULFLUR, THOMAS E & CYNTHIA L GLAHN, RANDOLPH L & LEANN 4535 SW TARLOW CT 10750 SW GARDEN PARK PL PORTLAND OR 97221 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -04100 2S103DD -04200 GRAY, RANDY J & GOOLEY, DAVID JOSEPH & TERESA LY SHIPPEY, JULIANE M 4635 SW 42ND PL 10740 SW GARDEN PARK PL PORTLAND OR 97221 TIGARD OR 97223 2S103DD -04300 2S103DD -04400 GOOLEY, DAVID JOSEPH & TERESA LY MULFLUR, THOMAS E & CYNTHIA R 4635 SW 42ND PL 4535 SW TARLOW CT PORTLAND OR 97221 PORTLAND OR 97221 2S103DD -04500 2S103DD -04600 MULFLUR, THOMAS E & CYNTHIA R HOLMES, HAROLD W /CLARA V 4535 SW TARLOW CT 5455 REGENT ST W PORTLAND OR 97221 TILLAMOOK OR 97141 2S103DD -05300 2S103DD -05400 KELLEHER, PHILLIP M MILLER, BRUCE R 17690 SW SHAWNEE TRAIL 9255 SW 3RD AVE TUALATIN OR 97062 PORTLAND OR 97219 2S103DD -05500 2S110AA -00600 ROBERTS, RICHARD D AND TEXLAND PROPERTIES CORP JACQUELINE J 2828 N HASKELL AVE 10495 SW 135TH AVE DALLAS TX 75204 BEAVERTON OR 97005 2S110AA -00700 2S110AA -02800 UNION OIL CO OF CALIFORNIA DANNA BROTHERS PROPERTIES ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DIV 9800 SE STARK ST PO BOX 7600 PORTLAND OR 97216 LOS ANGELES CA 90051 • • TO: 7 ,0�� �/ �/1 �/I�A1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 0 f H D C1 eA- DATE: September 27, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: III NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS • 1. 4 'CIT (2) copies - CPO NO. 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS Building Official /Dave S. Parks & Recreation Board /'Police t ROCarder Field Operations ngineering /Michael A. 4v: - • • ' -'or erree G. _ Long Range Planning /Carol 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ilkelire District ' (pick -up box) je Water Department 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 - Tualatin Valley Water District _nified Sewerage Agency /SWM Program 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. '155 N. First St. Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro, OR 97124 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. Boundary Commission 150 N. First Ave. 800 NE Oregon St. #16 Suite 540 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232 -2109 Brent Curtis - Kevin Martin - METRO - GREENSPACES PROGRAM • Mike Borreson Mel Huie (CPA's / ZOA's) - Scott King 600 NE Grand Fred Eberle Portland, OR 97232 -2736 - - DLCD (CPA's /ZOA's) - City of Beaverton 1175 Court St. NE Jim Hendryx - Principal Planner Salem, OR 97310 -0590 PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 Other - _ City of King City City of Durham - City Manager City Manager 15300 SW 116th PO Box 23483 -3483 King City, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 - City of Lake Oswego - City of Portland City Manager Planning Director 380 SW A 1120 SW 5th __-Lake-Os -.o, OR 97034 .ortland, OR 97204 State Highway Division ^'_ ______ Sam Hunaidi Laurie Nicholson L PO Box 25412 9002 SE McLoughlin Blvd. Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Milwaukie, OR 97222 City � Tualatin PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES , eneral Telephone Portland General Elec. Engineering Office Brian Moore PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Fry. Tigard, OR 97281 -3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Natural Gas Metro Area Communications Scott Palmer Jason Hewitt 220 NW Second Ave. Twin" Oaks Technology Center Portland, OR 97209 181'5 NW 169th Place S -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 - TCI Cablevision of Oregon Linda Peterson US West 3500 SW Bond St. - Pete Nelson Portland, OR 97201 421 SW Oak St. ortland, OR 97204 Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) _ 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct. Tri -Met Transit Dev. Beaverton, OR 97005 Kim Knox -• 710 NE Holladay St. 6. STATE AGENCIES Portland, OR 97232 _ Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) -- DOGAMI - Division of State Lands Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park OTHER - Fish & Wildlife PUC Dept. of Environ. Quality - 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers - Post Office 8. OTHER _ Southern Pacific Transportation Company ' Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 10 -05 -1995 11:44 503 684 5295 JOSEPH HUGHES CONST. P.02 T -05 -1995 08:S8 411C NORTHWEST P.02 Ryd«' CeMM/W l L.ning i >iavla.t War Point 10 c, .. Canyon COUR. Suite 190 San Ramon. Cafhfern* 94993 S1 • 0 866 4109 Fax 610 1551354 RIMIER October 4, 1995 Mr. Chris Lind, Director of Construction BC Northwest, LP 1111 Main, Ste. 560 vaUcouver, Wa. 95660 Dear Chris, Thank you for your patience with regard to production of a truck utilizing an underbody mountod affirmation unit. At last, it appears we are on our way. TAcrwoking has committed to special production of one ;mit for your Tigard, Oregon location. Due to the time required to buy/build the necessary f Ooe*4s and then assemble the complete unit, 'Thermaing has committed to 90 delivery from date of order. I hope by Friday to have shuffled around completed chassis-body combinations enabling me to simply install the undcrbody gait on se existing new vehicle. This wilt enable me to provide you the required equipment in the most expedient time- frame. The bottom -line is, "its on Its way". Please call me if you have any questions at (510) 855 -4105. Sincerely, Ryder Transportation Resources Scott A. Blaze National Sales Executive Commercial Leasing and Scrvian cc: Bill Gibbons Greg Tomsick JOSEPH HUGHES STRUCTION, INC. GENERAL CONTRA OR 4\ ;23., (503) 624 -7100 RECEIVED r OCT 0 21995 September 8, 1995 COMMUNITY OEVELOPiMIT Margeaux C. Rubio 2028 Grahn Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Dear Ms. Rubio: It is our understanding that you are the owner of the property at 10840 SW Garden Park Place in Tigard, Oregon. There is a new restaurant which was built behind your property recently. If there are no complaints about excessive night lighting from your tenant, we will presume that the lighting is acceptable. Should there be a problem, please contact us immediately. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, L s p, , , i,, seid ,,,,,, ,,, , Douglas Chelson Project Manager e: \doug \bmtigard • • 7035 S.W. Hampton • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • FAX (503) 684 -5295 t 76,60 °s PRIVATE •1 e1 -, �,._ - -__._. . B • 1.. -, d , ----„- i i i . 1�cuc .... d t w g ....\. _ ( .. ,: ....i, I' • 85 _ W s 111.54 \ :+ ggC s •1g 1$ 114.60 Y N 8 8 al el _ 3 a w W 1 NO°06'25 "w 0 t S i g g 104.65 HIM Ia6t:1. Pi ' 1' • 7401 e) so O ✓\. e6 L 60 Ri g ` co 73 - 111.70 QQ a a o • - ''s -0 • .O / 11.70 a 116.27 e A ie 51 IP ,4 7 ' F 4ao4 0 ?9 66' • G coy �d I g • ? Cn r_�i � .s. Z ' e0 56.84 pL 111.61 4 N " j66 A I _ 6073 94 pLATE • t 11d to o x,84 STREET C\ 0 120.67 I6� a7 • a� �� 7t�a7 ° D 111.53 ` :� o • u = =• .. a 44 _ _- '4 §0 8 c m v ap m 1 .$ 103.17 g • d e 1'J6.27 g for �. • '. m.4 , 4 CA li # : e0 69 1.117 + !C:; o it — 37SI A- — , 60 °42'W 165.111714/L ; $ IILa7 -:• C • r o 1 s o O b = 10317 111.26 �N i ' O s A O _ n b �; . • �\0 °06'26'1Y l as.: A No i L46- 6' is + 103.17 111.63 = \ 41 a es s 0a • a : , 0 • Ft . J �?° .. t a 103.17 n ° 112.02 as \ t 4% •,8 • it, • / • *. N La "� X4 1 L e 1 .v e a \1 �a�ch' O p. so� �q p v � � e .184 I „, , , S s O ,. a O /' 4� �' fil r '" " ° W I. ,p / o` CO I. to i . I g 0 y , / 4 Y I 1.g I g r 9 P4:. t. 01 06 e so. I / . ••7:" I . b., . .y„. Di •�. 1� +. . / • I . . 0 • Tl e._ 4 SS.e__ ic� -- e_co S1i61,0 44-10-4— ro o 0 w-t-ear- r - fir17I a v Kx C. flab rd -2°-2-411 6valth 10 vVt/Q_ Som +a lien e ( 4 cr 5zo `f re ) 5 104 3 (aD V f iA4 5 t o 3 00 --l-�x . • • September 6, 1995 Joeseph Hughes Construction, Inc. General Contractor CITY OF TIGARD Douglas Chelson, Project Manager 7035 SW Hampton Street OREGON Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Finish Items for the Boston Market Dear Douglas; This letter is in response to your request for written verification of construction issues yet to be completed for the Boston Market site in order to complete construction of the required site buffering improvements from adjoining residential areas. The drainage issues you listed in your September 6th letter are beyond the scope of review of the Planning Division and a final solution to those problems will have to be reviewed and approved by the appropriate Building and /or Engineering Department staff. Your review of our last discussion is correct. One additional issue has come up based on a call I received today. The Planning Division will need written sign off of the adjoining property owner of the duplex to the north of parking lot lighting concerning the light glare or the fixture may be further modified to reduce the impact. An additional 20 feet of arborvitae will need to be planted adjoining the existing arborvitae near the trash enclosure to finish the vehicle headlight buffer. As this was originally reviewed during the day the full angle of motorists headlights on the adjoining homes was not apparent. A representative from a company Boston Market is working with for delivery trucks contacted me and stated that newer above cab refrigeration units may be provided to service this facility. It also appears that trucks which presently service this site use above cab refrigeration units. The previous agreement I had with Boston Market was that below cab units would be used or that mature landscape screening would be provided to buffer noise generated from the refrigeration units. The leasing agent states that newer above cab units are quieter than the older below cab units. However, the screening which was constructed may not provide any sound attenuation for taller vehicles with above cab refrigeration units. This issue will also need to be resolved before the Planning Division can sign off on permanent occupancy of this facility. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, 74,(2 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 ..- -.ELE JOSEPH HUS CONSTRUCTION, INC. • GENERAL CONTRACTOR TRANSMITTAL (503) 624.7100 TO: — DATE: -- . • Q 4*► iNd& - 7 . RE: /1 77 44. ATTN: • fl4( //r R;o i ( A FAX #: 4)154 7#W7 We Transmit Via FA the Following: 3 Pages Transmitted including this Page. LETTER( _ CHANGE ORDER REQUEST(S) E PLANS /SPECIFICATIONS PROPOSAL/QUOTATION _ CHANGE ORDER(S) L SUBMITTAL(S) BUDGET ESTIMATE — CONTRACT(S) •. {..w•:o,: �i „• o.: ^:rtn •,.t.w>; •.,; <9 c::r:•k.a:•::> ., , .,:�, , •�::x:�:• : : ic!c :.: <t ,t C. ..�. ,,: '•�k Ca^GK \ "0�: �'x...,<: :t •.a .eb. . >; <�. .> . r`d2> . F•� "x. :....�krr:,:.;::t {:;v'u, ,:,2..�; <...: : »....:> . ,.p. , r �..?,\ :�,. �� >)�Yv.a .. ,�. aX`.3 ,. <..�^4v'•..',�:,.;:•. ;��. �/: i:'a.n. .::c.,, ..•: :k.:,.. ?.... a:•::•. ,•�L`•,'2•si i�L� >: •:...,,.::.�:>:d:': : •[•1 r R TF Ak• :;`..: ,..x,.;.:.l ir;;.: >� }..5$..•t�el >t, ..t. , >.t,c:``•tx: `.:�5 ,,t, 5. ''; t: �::�.. , o . +:.. �v'S:'�x:rv:a.: >•rt..`. •. „tt'.•. . a.�,.;.:..3...o:, iJE3�i.F:ll �•I.IOI`F: `:':.?>�•>: R • •: �.•:.•:�:. \ �Z\' �>. .u:.:*ro:•:0�'?L;;�F•y�:•;i�.y.. Svc:.!„ Z�, a` Sa'2�:4�w�i2tw�,o�..Y�,k4lL;,,: Q j ,.,.�ic.a .,��`•.::R,..,v.: >{ �:. �...:.,2•:>.t,... , ., }. :.. .a:6:w�: ,..t ...,v,. a::..,;:t:5 ...: .... . .... . . <ts ... , w,'.. � , .. r • F FOR YOUR APPROVAL • — FOR YOUR REVIEW & COMMENT El PER YOUR REQUEST FOR YOUR SIGNATURE . FOR YOUR USE FOR YOUR ACTION FOR QUOTATION Please Return Signed Originals. REMARKS: • THANK YOU, Copies: • f BY: -74 asir-t-Sio/i 11___�_�.....'r:��_J /1..... I . r� •v /e nn% e.n• rnnr . ... ... TO'd 900' £O:TT S6`9 daS S6ZS1789'°N 131 '1SN00 S3H9f1H Hd3SOf J I4JL JOSEPH HUGHES CONSTRUCTION, INC. GENERAL COSACTOR (503) 624 -7100 September 6, 1995 Planning Department City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 -8199 ATTENTION: MARK ROBERTS Dear Mark: Over the past month Boston Market(BCNW), Joseph Hughes Construction(JHC), and the City of Tigard have tried to complete the work to satisfy the requirements of Tigard's Planning Department. I need to close this project and obtain the Certificate of Occupancy and desire to have written directive from the City of Tigard. BCNW and JHC were instructed by Mark Roberts to accomplish the following items: 1. Install six foot arborvitae to the top of the swale next to the trash enclosure to mitigate headlight glare 2. Install four foot arborvitae West of the drive - through speaker to reduce noise levels 3. Install a glare reducer or directional device to the Southwesterly most light pole to reduce light levels 4. Change out the light over the back doors to reduce light shining into the neighbors windows 5. Solve the problem of swale overflows during rain 6. Solve the problem of excess water in the yards to the West of Boston Market. The above were accomplished and Mark Roberts inspected the site on 8/26. Last Thursday (8/31) we were instructed to add 20 feet of arborvitae to the South of the row previously installed at the trash enclosure. There also seems to be some question as to the acceptability of the amount of light from overhead lights on the site and that a sign -off from the owner of the Southerly duplex may be needed. I need to have clear directions from the city so 7035 S.W. Hampton • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • FAX (503) 684-5295 • ZO'd 900 £O :TT S6'9 daS S6ZSb89'ON 131 '1SNOJ S3H9f1H Hd3SOC that they can be accomplished and written off. The Certificate of Occupancy for Boston Market is dependant on the Planning Department signing off on this portion of the work and I would appreciate prompt response. Please provide written directive on those things which must be accomplished by us for approval by the end of the day. Call me at 624 -7100 or page me at 790 -6434 if you have questions or clarifications. Thank -you, 4:1 c7 Douglas Chelson Project Manager, Joseph Hughes Construction £0'd 900 £O:TT S6'9 d38 S6ZSb89'°N 131 'ISN00 S3H9f1H Hd3SOC //iaiP'A����i�F I � i �.� July 24, 1995 ^,(� �� CITY OF TIGARD B.C. Northwest L.P. OREGON Attention: Julie Martin Development Coordinator 1111 Main Street Suite 560 Vancouver, WA 98660 Re: Minor Modification Review to add outdoor seating Dear Julie; This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification approval to the approved site plan to add outdoor seating. Based on a review of the applicable parking ratio standards this type of change does not require additional off - street parking. This change also does not require any changes to areas which are currently provided with landscaping. Due to the limited nature of the expected impact of the proposed additional outdoor seating, this change is not expected to negatively impact the site or adjoining properties. For this reason the Director hereby approves the proposed Minor Modification. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 • RECEIVED PLANNING • JUL 2 41995 C ROTISSERIE - BC Northwest, L.P. 1111 Main St. ��IC•�K� Suite 560 Vancouver, WA 98660 BC Northwest, L.P. 360 7501130 Phone a Boston Chicken Franchisee July 20, 1995 360 750 0668 Phone Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 Subject: Boston Market Restaurant Located At 13935 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, Oregon Dear Mark: Please accept this letter as confirmation of our conversation regarding BC Northwest's intent to install outdoor patio furniture at our above referenced restaurant. I have enclosed a copy of our site plan, on which I have placed red dots to indicate where this patio furniture is to be located. We have arranged the tables in an effort to allow for safe and easy access by our customers. Per your request, I have researched the affect this added seating may have on our landscape percentage and parking ratio requirements. I believe that City of Tigard requires that an establishment devote 15% of its site square footage to vegetation and landscape. Boston Market has devoted 34% of its development to landscape. It is also my understanding that City of Tigard requires a parking ratio of 1 per 200 square foot of building, which would equate to the requirement of 27 spaces for this establishment. Boston Market has developed 47 (2 of which are handicap) parking spaces. In both cases of landscaping and parking, if we were to add the patio area to the building square footage and recalculate the percentage and ratio requirements, Boston Market would still exceed the minimum requirements set by City of Tigard. BC Northwest's sole intent in adding this outdoor seating to our Tigard Boston Market location is to offer fair weather seating for our customers and to increase the quality of their dining experience with us. Should you wish to further discuss this matter, please feel free to contact me prior to August 1. Thank you for you continued assistance with this project. Sincerely, *A � t lie Mart i evelopment Coordinator July 13, 1995 „„,a , 4 Christopher Lind CITY OF TIGARD Construction Manager OREGON BC Northwest, L.P. 1111 Main Street, Suite 560 Vancouver, WA 98660 Re: The Boston Chicken Restaurant at 13935 SW Pacific Highway Dear Mr. Lind; This letter is in response to complaints we've received from neighbors related to the lack of required screening and buffer measures which are required to be installed at this site. Neighbors state that the site currently provides no screening from noise, headlights and site activities. The landscape area behind the store is planted with several evergreen trees of insufficient size to provide any immediate screening. The Conditions of Approval for this development require that a row of trees be provided with 10 feet of height at planting for deciduous trees and five feet of height at planting for evergreen trees. None of the evergreen tree which were planted meet this standard. A row of shrubs are also to be provided. Based on their size at planting either 30 five gallon or 60 one gallon shrubs will need to be planted. None are presently planted in this area. A fence, wall or row of evergreen shrubs is also required to be provided to act as screening. None of these measures have been used to date. The rest of the buffer area is to be planted in lawn, ground cover or spread with bark mulch. None of these methods of ground cover appear to have been used. Also, the menu order speaker is presently oriented towards the homes. During the review of the freezer expansion the order speaker was required to be oriented towards the commercial areas to the west of the site rather than towards the residential areas. Mature landscape materials were also to be provided adjoining the loading area landscape wall to provide screening of refrigerated trucks and protection of the wall from graffiti vandalism. We will need these screening measures remedied within 10 days or be required to cite the - property owner and issue a summons for the property owner to appear in court on these required property improvements. Please note that there has not been a final approval of the plan and site improvements as is required prior to occupancy. Construction of the screening and buffering improvements is required to be obtained prior to opening the market and therefore operation of the market is a violation of the 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 i Boston Market Page 2 Community Development Code. We would be happy to meet with you to discuss and hopefully resolve these issues quickly. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, i rnet44 4 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP C: Code Enforcement Division • March 7, 1995 Lisa Domenico, Project Manager CITY OF TIGARD BC Northwest, L.P. OREGON 1111 Main Street Suite 560 Vancouver, WA 98660 • Re: Minor Modification to Site Development Review 94 -0025 Dear Lisa; This letter is in response to your request to modify the original site development approval through the provision of an additional 1,812 square feet of freezer space to allow storage for future restaurants in the area. Although the freezer space reduces the total number of parking spaces, this addition does not by itself generate the need for additional parking spaces pursuant to the Off - Street Parking requirements. Even with the reduction in spaces the site will continue to exceed the minimum parking standards for this type. of use. The site will also continue to exceed the landscape requirements for the General Commercial Zoning District. The Director has recommended approval of this modification subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The screen wall and landscaping revisions provided on the site plan submitted March 6th shall be constructed. - 2. The truck design and motor idling limitations detailed within your letter dated March 6, 1995 shall be complied for maintenance of liveability reasons for the adjoining residences. 3. The menu board shall be repositioned such that the speaker is pointed away from the adjoining residences (preferrably towards the Christian Marketplace site). Thank you for your interest in maintaining the liveability -of neighboring residential areas. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, 1//444 Mark Roberts Assistant Planner, A.I.C.P. • 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 TRI -MET ENGINEERING TEL :503- 239 -2281 Jun 30 95 17:11 No.014 P.02 40 TRI -MET MEMORANDUM DATE: June 30, 1995 TO: Will D'Andrea, City of Tigard FROM: Kiln Knox, Tri -Me SUBJECT: Boston Chicken pproval The purpose of this memo is to respond to the bus stop condition of approval for the Boston Chicken project. Based upon the attached drawing, there is adequate area along the sidewalk to accommodate a bus passenger landing area per the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This involves provision of a five -foot wide by eight -foot deep paved area which can be accommodated within the proposed eight -foot deep sidewalk. Tri -Met will be responsible for installing the bus stop pole. I will forward the applicant's number to Tri -Met staff to coordinate placement of the bus stop pole at the appropriate time in the construction process. cc: Doug Chelson, 11.1C Inc. TRI -MET ENGINEERING TEL:503- 239 -2281 Jun 30 95 17:11 No .014 P.03 I• JUS.PH 1IU[,F LAINSI. Itll MU.O64Di'D `�� JV.,J aV•. + . , ..- . • . I , • c /// st p ...... 1 i O P1P7 t • or \ \ 1 :' ' ,.. V • • ��� • < / t .•• ..... 1 " !t • 4 ;f0 4 , 1 1110 .1b, °al • 0 Il 440 ;:al=ningittilL), I 411111110141."," . ,,,,„: / ����� e� & vL .. . ar 01$ , . 4 .:,.... ,.......... 1 . . e• „, ro .. . ail ... , . , It 1 1 i 311 M Wil'*1016*1%.44 v... 1PAOA ' a ". ..- Al • 41.11" i : :. .. '...•..../.........y.: .: '....... . to . 4 0. . , a „J... /....)41, ,. .. ,".., • ,, ail ' i + ,. 1! : 1 ..• _ Q . ... bet .. S...... ;I IIlIN,? �I 'IIi; ?i�: ilia . 0 ,..„.„. ,:. 0 0 '''''ill --e ; , .y, p, 1 • ! . ' _ i :t:, . • � /, • . / I . ,sa �G 1 ' �/' R a; , 4,0„,_ • • ' X • • • 4 . 1 i i � ! .• I , " <' I .., 8 ,- . , 1� r \ e l", ,.; Pe , ,.\ 1. • \ \ gyp -�% �,\ \ ��` \ . . 4.. I 4„,* . „el- • . .. P Am . . 4 . . • • • • gy pSTp . - BC Northwest, L.P. ROTISSERIES 1111 Main St. Suite uve CK�'� Vancouver, WA 98660 BC Northwest, L.P. 206 7501130 Phone a Boston Chicken Franchisee 206 750 0668 Phone February 27, 1995 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Minor Modification to Site Development Review SDR 94 -0025 Dear Mr. Roberts: Please accept this letter as a request by BC Northwest, L.P. to apply for a minor modification to the Site Development Review SDR 94 -0025. This modification as referenced in the attached site plans, involves a net increase of approximately 1,812 square feet of building to the current plan. There have been minor changes to the approved site plan such as the configuration of the trash enclosure and loading area, as well as possible relocation of menu boards. The change to the building is merely an expansion of the kitchen/food preparation area in order to accommodate food production for several surrounding Boston Market restaurants. We estimate trips to increase no more than 10 -11per day. Additionally, the pedestrian access point from the adjacent parcel to the south was slightly modified. All landscape and parking calculations have been reviewed for proper compliance. I have also included building elevations for your review. We have provided you with two different site plans for consideration which specifically addresses the loading area. The first option provides for a full drive -thru lane for loading and the other addresses a separate loading area which is concealed by a landscape buffer. I have additionally included pictures of the Boston Chicken in Vancouver, Washington which depict the parapet as screening of air cooling and heating systems. The parapet completely screens these systems from all four sides and is a permanent facet of the building. We would appreciate your most expedient review of this request. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or should you require additional information. Respectfully, a/&//-/ ,spa, Lis A. Domenico Project Manager cc: File Chris Lind MacKenzie /Saito & Associates STp • do • C ROTISSERIE—) BC Northwest, L.P. �j�� C Su to 560n St. Vancouver, WA 98660 BC Northwest, L.P. 360 7501130 Phone a Boston Chicken Franchisee 360 750 0668 Phone March 6, 1995 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Minor Modification to Site Development Review SDR 94 -0025 Dear Mr. Roberts: In accordance with our conversation, the following is a summary of our proposal for mitigation of possible noise impacts related to the restaurant loading area. Boston Market will restrict loading/unloading of refrigerated trucks between the hours of nine p.m. and seven a.m. These restricted hours are based upon Chapter 18.90 Environmental Performance Standards section of the City of Tigard Zoning Ordinance. During the hours of seven a.m. and nine p.m., trucks that will be loaded /unloaded will not be allowed to idle longer than 5 minutes, but refrigerated fans will be allowed to operate continuously as required for health code reasons. The attached plan, for review, depicts a 6' -8' high screen wall with landscape buffering. As an added note, Boston Market is currently looking at 18' trucks instead of the previously mentioned 26' truck. The truck will be equipped with an undermount condenser unit for the refrigeration system, which will reduce the refrigeration fan noise substantially due to the location. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Respectfully, ,6 Li A. Domenico Project Manager cc: File Mr. Chris Lind - BC Northwest, L.P. Mr. Tom Wright - Mackenzie /Saito & Associates Mr. Dave Bergmann - W &H Pacific S • COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC Legal 8040 P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684 -0360 Notice T T • BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 RECEIVED Legal Notice Advertising WW1 ©81994 City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. 'FY OF TIGARD • Tigard ,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit e :r m.) trio.. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) r'd I, Kathy Snyder ; 14 being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theagard— Tualat T4.mes a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Ti gard in the F aforesaid county and state; that the SDR 94 - 0025 Boston Chicken /MAP )1 i a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the "`"� " • entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: November 3,1994 :611/■.J. Subscribed and sworn to a re me this3rd da of Novembe ,,�,, OFFICIAL SEAL 0444 cu w ; ,,y ROBIN A. BURGESS � 1 '� � NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON Notary Pul$kl for Oregon ,h, COMMISSION NO. 024552 C(J� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY15,19977 My Commission Expires: r AFFIDAVIT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 S.W. Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site Develop- ment Review request to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive - thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and ad- ministrative services, public support facilities, professional and ad- ministrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, busi- ness support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking es- tablishments among other uses. -'`6- �;1.1�1til 126111 t-1 s A � v'" � - . .. _ I c. to In NM 11 ii 1p e .�. =Ior a u ■ .. ■ r�iii` 1 ' ■.a. ■r-• 1 /iv milk • mos =E. 111111114 . Iv ,- : r,,UlJIitair 4` \. ■ t.. �1 __ r Mi ul miles 111111 w ` I 111111le wM! - I7 ► ■ I■ ` La 1 r um a 6 111 __ .. �;,�aW .�� IAA r i g W MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 94 -0012 (REVISED DECISION) ROYAL OAKS /GOTTER The Director has approved, subject to revised conditions, a request to par- tition one existing lot into three lots. The existing parcel is 1.17 acres. The proposed parcels are approximately 10,052 and 17,362 square feet respec- tively. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.50, 18.88, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, l 18.162, and 18.164. LOCATION: An adjacent property to the west of • 11670 S.W. Bull Mountain Road (WCTM 2S1 1OBD, tax lot 1400). ZONE: The property is zoned R -4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units /acre). which allows urban low density residential development. T• s•.. -►.I► i. ta•, -tt1 III Wi _ � �� ,�� � ° :� oms�uunn van, ti a 11111 litilli '1 Mai ri III R --3'5 :�r ■ 1 ` :t,. • —.111111 11 i �� I� tr.1117310*.■-ij44.40..ii _ z .. %/ 17.-: FLU al Illi .0.4, ohm Twiggy MN, . III � �.wy triKil.. / I , } ► �k LI Ill Idi .. b;: - 11111111 . mor �' - i I - 1 e - . -. / The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on November 14, 1994. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290 (A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written ap- peal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The dead- line for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M. November 14, 1994. TT8040 — Publish November 3, 1994. I MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Will D'Andrea October 28, 1994 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 94 -0025 BOSTON CHICKEN Description: The applicant requests Site Development Review approval to construct a 3361 sft drive -thru restaurant at 13935 SW Pacific Highway. The site is located on the northwesterly side of the highway, northeasterly of the SW Gaarde Street /SW McDonald Street intersection. Findings: 1. STREETS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study entitled "Transportation Impact Analysis ", "Boston Chicken, SW Gaarde Street /Highway 99W" prepared by Kittelson & Associates, Inc., dated September, 1994. The report analyzes the effects of the additional traffic from the site at the existing driveway and the impact to the traffic on SW Pacific Highway, a State Highway. The report concludes that the additional traffic will have little impact on the traffic utilizing SW Pacific Highway and the closest street intersection at SW Gaarde Street /SW McDonald Street. No public improvements are recommended. However, the traffic report assumes that the existing driveway onto SW Pacific Highway is to provide full - access. The report is currently being reviewed by ODOT and may require an up -date if the driveway is to provide right -turn in, right -turn out only, as a condition of approval by ODOT. The applicant is required to obtain a revised ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Pacific Highway. The highway has been constructed to current State standards and no additional right -of -way or street construction is required. In addition, the site plans shows access to SW Gaarde Street, across the contiguous property to the south. The applicant should establish a mutual access and manintenance agreement for this driveway. The existing driveway approach should be re- constructed with a radius entrance to facilitate the right turn off of SW Gaarde Street. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along both sides of SW Pacific Highway and the ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -25 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE1 • applicant should place the facilities located along this frontage underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer is located in an easement at the rear of the property and has sufficient capacity to serve this proposed development. The site plan indicates that a private easement will be required to cross a portion of the adjacent property. Prior to the issuance of the plumbing permit, the applicant should provide a copy of the necessary recorded easement document to the Building Department. 3. STORM SEWER: The site currently is partially covered by an existing parking lot that serves the existing auto sales business. The site drains toward the rear to an underground system within the adjoining Gaarde Park subdivision. The applicant's preliminary grading indicates that a water quality swale is to be constructed along the rear landscape area and that the storm water will be transported to the existing underground system with a new catch basin and new underground pipe at the southwest corner of the site. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. The applicant's preliminary site plan provides for the required on -site water quality facility. The facility should comply with the minimum USA design standards, and shall be maintained by the applicant. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for all common driveways. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department(639 -4171) 2. The applicant shall re- construct the existing driveway approach onto SW Gaarde Street in accordance with a design approved by the Engineering Department, and obtain a Street Opening Permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept. (639 -4171) 3. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right -of -way of ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -25 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE2 • SW Pacific Highway (99W). A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of the building permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept. (639- 4171). 4. The applicant shall provide for on -site water quality treatment, as shown on the site plan, as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. Design calculations shall be in conformance with the general requirements of Surface Water Quality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook, USA, 1991. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 -4171) 5. The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream storm drain system will not be unduly affected by the on -site storm drainage run - off. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 -4171) 6. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the northerly side of Pacific Highway, or pay the fee in- lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept. (639 -4171) 7. The applicant shall provide copies of the recorded private easement documents that pertain to the access to the existing public sewer and storm drain systems, and include the connection work in the required Street Opening Permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Dept. (639 -4171) IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST 1. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. APPROVED: (2?. Randall R. Wooley City Engineer N: \ENGINEER \SDR99- 25.mja ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -25 BOSTON CHICKEN PAGE3 11/03/94 14:18 a 503 228 3821 BENNER /STANGE 01 4t'"� Not 7672 g Time RECEIVED pr,� � �.� No. d Pages �od ay's �r``55EE�a`` 7 ,,_„ , C�' � � ���� ` � �4�4d 0 4 To / ' '1 p ft4p 'From te1W(, J 64,2pk I /n( 1994 �r"m _Mt rr o r n 1/ �P C"Pam N T/1# harg 1/ MUNITY DEVELOPMENT Location location Dept. e Fax a Y 231f- Z . 2 - 4 , / Telephone N Fax N I 307 Telep2i ,0� / Comments � man: El Destroy U Return LI Call lot pup in, , il ,/ i goYt'L7 'f7 / . / /i4 itet-e4Awo pie Fop - )( FEg. 7-62i Gf /l fq4. ciaz n4e, 7v cr5r.1155 . We._ Mww I__ze To A'v4' -f z1 ref 5 A. S ..4 •P -77 11 1 X P#Z1 A I E ID 9 31(0c) u',„ I...r t 5 OOd 00' 41" (9 OOd 42' Y� ( \ — I W 185.57' (I85.b1) ' ( D107WALC (-Et EVIL 177tTateNP31 — — — — — — _ N Op; P 6' / i ® i I '< e ' LAHDsGAPC �� 4 `0. � .-d to / / // • o4 _„.ux,;rc , / �1 o� ,' j 4 : • . F , C, tW .ACTICCvAc, P ,p. � ,L'� �/' 1 (q N `j / e.. r xY yPJi Q /; L I. ty �. ,G / V A ,o a Ci .� 8 c 1 I iti [a _ �• 2 ......., - 1 . l'- ' . rah , . . . . . ® .:, F I O " r. : y ofl r . �: 3 z .. � •' r ,` �� i / / �, / / I — ! — _ I .62144 3AVVNO7 / fl -�- - — — _ _ .. 9N01 ',00 OSZ jo ir adv 041 'AlKI 111105 \ i \ , ''' ,,,/ . 0 O AO 1N9•1995 \ \ . • 03A044321 3B 01 .3013:1 4•41151)(3. ,, ,,41/ � � 41•' 141`043t1 01 (.1d1213N �fTV1.13O1s 9?/LLSIX3 0:7,/ ' I ' d 3t1 3a Ol N91S .S21010N Ot Y9LL. 9NLLS 3 (050144 I 1IA10'321) 9NIdVVSGNV1 11 j 13N Th'1SNI O11V vaav SINl NI 913d110 ��� !:;:. :- :: : ... ',Os:A 3A01.4321 - .9621(10 9NLLSIX3 AO 301 /r / �' ®1. (114S 39N04915 O t 91s N MS) /1 `' /- - -- 3019 1(3 'd ti a 9 G . - N915 NO /. 1 •• / 1 , S310d9V1 . . . 1 _ / A • j. " . � d0 3 . . v .,. .7' r°Alaa o seals Nioa) �; a 300Z NOISIH Ild3 F ,/,' � a� / CtO�B 3� 310d ®� \ V 1N91 1 9ts1X3 11/01/94 17:15 TRI�T 4 503 • 684 7297 • NO.185 P02 ric51h • I RECEIVED NOV 0 1 1994 TRI -ET COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • MEMORANDUM DATE: November 1, 1994 TO: Chris Lind, Boston Chicken Bruce Vincent, Jim Griffiths & Associates Kevin Godwin, Benner :Stange Associates FROM: .Kim Knox, Tri -M SUBJECT: Boston Chicken, Gaarde Avenue I appreciated the opportunity to meet with on October 2411h to review the comments contained in Tri- Met's October 19th memo regarding the Boston Chicken Iproposal at Pacific Highway and Gaarde Avenue. In that meeting, I identified the building relocation and creation of off -site pedestrian connections as the most critical chanages to the plan to achieve the intent of the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). I received a copy of the revised plan yesterday Iimm Kevin Godwin and have the following comments: 1) At the point Tri -Met received the plans for review, he developers had submitted substantially completed design plans for the. property. Although I recognize that redesigning to relocate the building would require added project expense, my co nments must reflect Tri -Met's perspective on whether or not the project as proposed meets the i tent of the Transportation Planning Rule. The Rule states that "all commercial developments be located as. close as possible to transit stops." In the absence of specific:Tigard developrne t. regulations addressing this requirement, it is my opinion that the proposed plan does not meet the requirements of the Rule. 2) The designers have attempted to respond to the ) for additional off -site pedestrian connections. However, the routes shown on thel revised plan do not respond to typical pedestrians who will choose the most direct routes whenever possible. The TPR. requires "safe and convenient" pedestrian routes. Tri -Met requests that the pedestrian mutes he min sited to provide more direct linkages as illustratedon the attached diagram. This requires mo ing some ot'the planting islands which are breaking up the banks of parking along both the north and south sides of the site We recommend that the City allow greater than 7 parking between the planters to accommodate these direct pedestrian linkages: 3) The revised plan incorporates two of the three peclesLian linkages requested in the October 19th letter. Mr. Godwin stated that the site topography as designed would require a stairway and retaining wall at the southeastern corner of the site t!o provide the most direct path for those 11/01/94 17:15 TRI -MET 4 503 684 7297 NO.185 P03 • I • Boston Chicken Memo • Page Two • arriving at the site on foot from the south. Withiut this connection, however, pedestrians arriving at the site from the signalized intersection to' the southeast must travel an additional 35() feet out -of- direction along Pacific Highway to react' the front door of the restaurant. Tri-Met requests a direct connection from the southet corner of the site to the entrance on the eastern building facade. Again, Tri -Met appreciates the opportunity to comment on (this project. Please call me at 239 -6716 if you have additional questions or comments. • • • • cc: Will D'Andrea, City of Tigard Bob Cortright, DLCD (w/ attachment.) Laurie 'Nicholson, ODOT • • • • 11/01/94 17:16 TRI—MET 4 503 684 7297 • NO.185 D04 I or) .0. : • Nli %;,,....4% 4,6:N. . . s, ■ \ \ 1\,\ t. ,_ '1\b. 'N 1 • I ''• . .. . k \ 1\ Cil ' 41 % • ill . .t J '� 4.. c ! . i ... _ - er ' . tnIgillibLi"; j. re `' _ i ,...... 40° 4 . -gill - • 1 i 4•••••?' . • • • . . • • '...8:1 . :: ' 1:...r.: . . / ` 4\ `'' .fit. • t I • P . ' , . i tki •• II I i .,..., 111 I 4 a;:4-\-. r Evaiii.1111,11.11.,..N.. IrWiligp -.. ; • : ;, ., .. 41 ' . i ,/' • ill • i . gl i !r .6- a .../79......" •54. ....----. 4 I.:: , : :.1 . . . .... 1. C -• s. ;; ;# .. savage simom'awbod 1+ . 141.1 .* . . /it- 4 -# it �� q' .. t' N . d 2 i 1 " i ..• joi 1, 4, ' ,� 6 . fi I a .� � ' 1% iti.s. °.' • 4 1 11/01/94 17:16 TRI�T -> 503 684 7297 NO.185 P05 , / / . • u '`O • ‘ 111 1 13111111111111. Mc LI 1_ INIIIIIIII., 1 * � immi ■► ■1 in al r IIIIIII IN El '. 0 / V ill o a 4 1 IF r .,,,,,...... x„,„..,„v......., I . r In ow _ , • Dor - RE -, \NI Q________,„ L____ • ..___ 11/01/94 17:14 TRI —MET -' 503 684 7297 NO.185 1701 • TRf -MST 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97232 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE; / //,, , q91- TO: 'Will D' Andr ea CO: City of Tigard FAX #: 684 -7297 FROM: CO: TRI -MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT FAX: (503) 239 -2281 TEL #: (503) 239 -6710 TIIIS TRANSMITTAL CONSISTS OF s PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE. . I RECEID • 8C!) OCT 2 0 igg4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OPMENf TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION 710 N.E. HOLLADAY STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 (503) 239 -2100 FAX (503) 239 -2280 October 19, 1994 Will D' Andrea City of Tigard Community Development 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Boston Chicken, SDR 94 -0025, 13935 SW Pacific Highway Dear Will: Tri -Met appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed Boston Chicken in the vicinity of SW Pacific Highway and Gaarde Avenue. The site is served by transit along Pacific Highway with 15- minute and better transit frequency during the peak hour, and half - hourly midday service and Saturday and Sunday service. A recent passenger census indicates that there are a relatively high number of transit customers using the Gaarde Avenue and Tigard Motors stops. Because of the proximity of the proposed Boston Chicken to the major transit corridor along Pacific Highway, it is critical that the building respond to existing and future pedestrian activity in the vicinity. The following comments respond to the requirements from the Transportation Planning Rule that new developments must orient to existing transit stops and that they provide safe and convenient pedestrian linkages to nearby destinations such as shopping centers and residential areas. The attached plan illustrates the following suggested changes to the plan to create more continuous and direct routes for pedestrians. The routes connect the building to primary pedestrian destinations including the bus stops, the adjacent retail center and potential future development on the site immediately north of the Boston Chicken site. 1) Create a continuous and direct pedestrian route along the building facade linking to the adjacent properties as indicated on the plan. 2) Relocate the building farther south to minimize the distance and amount of surface parking pedestrians must cross to enter the building from the south. Adequate width should be maintained to allow for the drive - through lane. 3) Widen the paved entrance area on the southern side of the building to match the 12' -7" width shown on the northern side of the building. This widening would terminate at the drive - through window. ciD TRI - COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON g6) • • 4) Incorporate an overhang /awning as indicated on the plan to provide weather protection along the identified pedestrian route. 5) Identify the existing bus stops on the plans. The applicant should coordinate with Tri-Met for specific locations of passenger landing areas to meet ADA requirements. 6) Where the pedestrian network crosses vehicle maneuvering areas, the crossing should be raised and delineated by a change in materials. Please call me at 239 -6716 if you have any questions. Sincere , it‘o Kimb rly Knox, Project Coordinator cc: Laurie Nicholson, ODOT 10/24/94 16:12 $503741259 ODOT - REGION 1 • Cj002 /002 ,6�� � REDDEST FOR COMMENTS TO: C�L.X� DATE: September 27, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department • RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. got refer to the enclosed letter. fib► Written Comments; (L 11) _ 1 I I / 4 � � + - Ana. . , _ i. 11�� 1 4 1, , l,e ±& taw h s II O 0-- r&LeQd - O<QJ ' • . Mei() rAkwdr ti Name of Person Commenting: ��� ��. ' ' , Phone Number: _ 1 - S DD S OT �� � ` REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: 1 �. DATE: September 27, 1994 � 1 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: /�-�J n g ' Q C� �%�(� T ea k Name of Person Commentingg ° L ° 1% I% WK-Cg � V T4 Phone Number: V qe g Q REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 1 TO: I -\rC p T S 1 (') DATE: September 27, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE C K THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: ' / �r � .�u tom Phone Number: X . - a t4;., 5' . • ` ` REQEST FOR COI NTS TO: v' DA TE: September 27, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: / Name of Person Commenting: l� /. Phone Number: 36I J III RECEIVED SEP 3 01994 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ;�7 ,,�, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: 1 51 [ l / `) liAttraJ aedir (C DATE: September 27, 1994 klia FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLES CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: _ «. Phone Number: 4-6 7ZZ Y • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: 6P1A 1 DATE: September 27, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: 17 EvEcOP �h Pl,c -GE Qc tAU 7 -r GTE S 5•Peoc(c4 no6J.s Name of Person Commenting: fin, (")-1412 ella Phone Number: (02n-6.943 /VJ • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Tigard Planning Department FROM: Maintenance Services Department DATE: September 30, 1994 SUBJECT: Site Development Review SDR 94 -0025 The Maintenance Services Department had no comments on the above referenced plans. W 3 CA/6A • _ I REOUEST FOR COMMENTS TO : t- I' z S t DATE: September 27, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: j�� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: � -(.ltb � DATE: September 27, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 - 4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written Comments: t.4 Li(uwrl of ,0- z" Douac- 04-60- VA-WE As-76448o (Co $A(LFct•l dQIe tok - NEV (c.£ WILL. I.I6E1 To 6E ik1S 0 DtR.Eut_Y aEIktkln 2 L.l�ktEd_ METH. V & LOCATION! /5 A--so Aio jJ A'S a' PROPERTY LM/ir f�eOrECVOAJ ~ / ,u 4OOITIoN To 771 2"' Dou4L ' eiiO414 ?/iO414 VALVE 4SSEM&Ly / IA /1 Or 1 Pgorecn u 'il /S REzaw•E'o 1.8. AT 77/6 JC / 4,VO A-Y MAc/ due- /F : 771 651“ h' /LSeS P./rY GJATEe_ ,c'o M/JCjii . /o,Avr OP use PQo7Z7o0 /5 /A/ /F. Uit/ /FOQM Name of Person Commenting: M /t.B H /G1.4502 Phone Number: X395 P 44M6wCc C oc. I 1 \> REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: -F�) k U DATE: September 27, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0025 BOSTON CHICKEN LOCATION: 13935 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 2S1 3DD, tax lot 1000). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 3,361 square foot drive -thru restaurant with 59 parking spaces. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Oct. 7, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Will D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 6J› We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: ' f"�- Phone Number: 603e7-6(61:1 X lump I ,•, : GREENBRIAR - ML_DIUM /L■RGE ttt liming S9St'3- DIMENSIONS ( i v -A 1 I A l • lir i r Arm MUM ® . -- .. Pole Top Mount A 8 C ` GBM Medium Arm Mount 21 -5/8' 15 -5/8' • GBPM Medium Pole Top 21 -5/8' 15 -5/8' 21- 15/16' GBL Large Arm Mount 26-1/8' 19-1/2" I GBPL Urge Pole Top _26 -1/8' 19 -1/2' 26- 13/16' • 'NOTE: 6 arm is standard, 12' arm is optional. • • NOTE: 6' arm is standard. 14' arm is optional. . =' .. • LUMINAIRE EPA CHART Includes bracket. N % 11E4 .A. X .+ Pole Top _ Single 990' 0180' T911' TN120' 090' Medium — Greenbriar - 6' Arm Mount Bracket (GBM) — 3.30 — 6.61 — — — Greenbriar -12' Arm Mount Bracket (GBM) 3.52 3.48 6.95 6.95 10.43 10.41 13.91 Greenbriar - PoleTop(GBPM) — — — — — — Large — Greenbriar - 6' Arm Mount Bracket (GBL) — 4.96 — 9.92 — — — Greenbriar -14' Arm Mount Bracket (GBL) 4.79 5.19 10.39 10.39 15.58 15.45 20.78 Greenbriar - Pole Top (GBPL) — — — — — — ORDERING INFORMATION Select appropriate choice from each column to formulate order code. Refer to example below. Luminaire Distribution Lamp Light Source' Lens Line Luminaire Options Prefix Wattage Voltage Finish Medium 2 - Type II 150 HPS - High Pressure Sodium CT - Contoured 120V Standard PCB' - Photoelectric Control and A , 3 - Type III 175 150, 250, 400 Watt Tempered Glass 208V BRZ - Bronze Receptacle 120, 208. 240. 277V GBM - (j • Perimeter ' 250 SMV - Super Metal Halide 240V COA - Cocoa LL - Less Lamp Arm Forward Throw 400 (Vertical) 400 Watt 277V VAN - Vanilla CL - Coated Lamp Mount Type V Square MH - Metal Halide 480V BLK - Black FS - Fusing for 120V & 277V GBPM - on 175. 250, 400 Watt MT - Multi Tap PLT _ Platinum (except for 1000W in 120V) Pole Top WHT - White FS1 - Fusing for 120V /1000W Architectural FD - Double Fusing for 208V 8 240V Large 2 - Type II 400 HPS - High Pressure Sodium (Optional) FD1 - Double Fusing for 480V FP - Penmeter 750 400, 750, 1000 Watt BRO - Brick HSS - House Side Shield GBL - Forward Throw 1000 SMV - Super Metal Halide RPA - Round Pole Adaptor (Vertical) 400 Arm FA - Automotive ROG - Gray Granite NO - No Options Mount Forward Throw 400. 1000 Watt ROG - Red Granite 5 - Type V Square MH - Metal Halide LMS - Limestone Color Decals GBPL - 400. 1000 Watt OTS - Oesertstone 45 - Light Gold Pole Top MGR - Green Marble 20 - Charcoal Metallic GRN - Green 55 - Black 94 - Blue Metallic 01 -Chrome 59 - Dark Green Six - inch Arm Mount (Bolt -On Bracket) or Pole Top (Mounting Hub) 51 Dark Red is included when ordering luminaires. 21- Tomato Red 309 - Putty 50 - White Ann Optlonst 12BK - 12' Bolt -On Arm 148K - 14' Bolt -On Arm I L■ i t 1 1 EXAMPLE OF A TYPICAL ORDER i GBM - 5 - 400 - MH - CT -120V - BRZ - NO j . 'Consult factory for Deluxe Mercu ry Vapor. '380V not available. I'•' arm Is standard nn Sinrw rxt n1AO rnniv,nr rv,n Wn•n rvn•nnn x f'.re.�nn,. • m�,r• .n rlarl• Tan• nit 7n• .. non• ,,,,,r.,,.,,,,,, Ti i'E GREENBRIAR SER,_.i - MEDIUM /LARGE Designed to be a vanguard for the '90s, there's finally a comprehensive approach to G R E E N B R I A R outdoor lighting. Greenbriar incorporates a high - performance vertical burn optical system into a smart, economical housing. From product development that excites the architect, to M E D I U M / L A R G E quality assurance that satisfies the electrical engineer, to long -term value for the owner. Strong in capability. Dependable without question. Unique in value. SPECIFICATIONS -- HOUSING REFLECTORS /DISTRIBUTION BALLAST Aluminum-housing and top- access PATTERNS High -power factor ballast with over are finished to produce a The Greenbriar.fixture is available in removable ballast tray. High clean, sharp appearance and five reflector systems and distri- Pressure Sodium fixtures feature designed to ensure weather -tight bution patterns, all with vertical a type HX -HPF or an R -HPF ballast construction. Top- access cover burn lamps: Type II (2), Type III (3) designed for -20'F operation. Metal provides ease of installation and (400 Watt only), Type V Square (5), Halide and Super Metal Halide servicing. Each fixture is UL listed Automotive Forward Throw (FA) fixtures feature a type CWA ballast for wet locations. (1,000 Watt only), and Perimeter designed for -20'F operation. LENS /GASKET Forward Throw (FP). All photo- BRACKETS /MOUNTING Contoured tempered lass lens metric data is certified by an p g independent testing facility. Refer to Brackets/Poles Section is sealed to the housing with an for bracket ordering information. EPOM gasket, preventing entry FINISHES Arm Mount: 6' extruded aluminum of moisture and insects. Each Greenbriar fixture is finished bracket designed to match lumin- DOOR FASTENERS with DuraGrip', LSI Lighting aire housing. Bracket and housing Four captive stainless steel door Systems' revolutionary superior attach to square pole with through- . fastr secure the top-access baked -on polyester - powder finish- bolts and one - piece, back -up pole cove the ure thg. access ing process to give the fixture an nut plate (included with fixture). exceptionally attractive appear- Round pole adaptor (RPA) SOCKET ance. Standard finish colors avail- required for mounting to 3' -5' Porcelain socket features spring- able for the Greenbriar are bronze, round poles. (See Options in reinforced contacts for long life. cocoa, vanilla, black, platinum and Ordering Information on reverse.) LIGHT SOURCES white. Optional architectural Six -inch arm mounts are shipped finishes include brick, gray granite, standard with single and 0 -180 The Greenbriar is designed to red granite, limestone, desert- configurations. Twelve -inch arm operate with any of the following stone, green marble and green. mounts are required for multiple lamp types: High Pressure Sodium, The OuraGrip polyester finish with- configurations of medium Super Metal Halide or Metal Halide. stands extreme weather changes luminaires. Fourteen -inch arm 0 without cracking or peeling. Finish mounts are required with multiple listed for wet locations. is guaranteed for five full years. configurations of large luminaires. Pole Top: The cast aluminum PHOTOMETRICS mounting hub conceals wiring compartment and mounting hard - 400W High Pressure Sodium MTG. ware (consisting of four 11/16' Type III HT. A B c 0 E F 0.0. aluminum rods and a high - Vertical Bum Distribution 1213.89 ' 6.94 4.86 2.78 1.39 .56 strength grade -five steel bolt with 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 4' 10.20 5.10 3.57 2.04 1.02 .41 nylon insert and split lock washer 6' 7.81 3.91 2.73 1.56 .78 .31 for double locking). 8' 6.17 3.09 2.16 1.23 .62 .25 3MH 0' 5.00 2.50 1.75 1.00 .50 .20 POLES ■■■■ 2' 4.13 2.07 1.45 .83 .41 .17 Refer to Brackets/Poles Section ■IIIII 2MH 4' 3.47 1.74 1.22 .69 .35 .14 6' 2.96 1.48 1.04 .59 .30 .12 for pole ordering information. 1MH 8' 2.55 1.28 .89 .51 26 .10 0' 2.22 1.11 .78 .44 .22 .09 1000W Super Metal Halide 0 Type V - Square Vertical Burn Distribution Mtn, A Lumen Rating 50.000 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 r 1 MH MH Refers to Mounting Height 4MH ®�''' 2MH MTG. 1111111111 3MH _ 11111111111 3MH 20' 17 25 4 50 2.25 1013 45 �� 2MH 22' 9.30 3.72 1.86 .93 .37 4MH 24' 7.81 3.13 1.56 .78 .31 "r::;' 1MH Front 26' 6.66 2.66 1.33 .67 .27 28' 5.74 2.30 1.15 .57 .23 r 0 30' 5.00 2.00 1.00 .50 .20 ■ r A 35' 3.67 1.47 .73 .37 .15 1MH 38' 3.12 1.25 .62 .31 .12 r 45' 2.22 .89 .44 .22 .09 -73$ MH 50' 1.80 .72 .36 .18 .07 ■ ® 3MH ISi Lumen Rating 125.000 111/1111 4 MH MH Refers to Mounting Height hating Q Front ��++++�u+�,IL9 a7, ,. LSI LIGHTING SYSTEMS. A Diws■on of LSI Indusfnes Inc. ■01999 LSI L ghhnq Systoms PnnlrM m U i.A 10000 ALLIANCE ROAD • P O. BOX 4 2728 - CINCINNATI f)Hil 45940 - n77R • IG 111 7O7_C' inn . c v •r. .,. 1 1 Transportation Impact Analysis 1 1 Boston Chicken 1 SW Gaarde Street/ Highway99W.. ., , 1 . „ „ , 1 _ „ ., ,, T igard, Oregon 1 1 b_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. 17 Transportation Planning /Traffic Engineering 1 1 September 1994 1 1 1 Transportation Impact Analysis Boston Chicken 1 S.W. Gaarde Street/ Highway 99W Tigard, Oregon 1 1 ' Prepared for: Boston Chicken Northwest 703 Broadway, Suite 500 Vancouver, Washington 98660 (206) 750 -0668 Prepared by: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ' 610 S.W. Alder, Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 228 -5230 Project No.: 1327.00 September 1994 1 1 1 ' September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 Executive Summary 1 Section 2 Introduction 3 Section 3 1 Existing Conditions 6 Section 4 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 12 Section 5 Conclusions and Recommendations 25 Section 6 References 27 Appendix A ' Description of Level of Service HCM Methods and Criteria Appendix B SIGCAP Level of Service Results Appendix C Traffic Impact Study/Traffic Count Data Appendix D ' 1994 Existing L.O.S. Worksheets (AM & PM) Appendix E 1995 Background L.O.S. Worksheets (AM & PM) ' Appendix F 1995 Total Traffic L.O.S. Worksheets (AM & PM) Appendix G Queue /Stacking Calculations 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ' September 1994 Boston Chicken-SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W List of Figures List of Figures Figure 1 1 Site Vicinity 5 Figure 2 Existing Lane Configurations 8 Figure 3 1 Existing Traffic Volumes 10 Figure 4 1995 Background Traffic Volumes 14 Figure 5 Site Plan 16 Figure 6 Trip Distribution (New Trips Only) 20 Figure 7 Site - Generated traffic 21 Figure 8 1995 Total Traffic Volumes 22 1 List of Tables Table 1 1 Existing Transportation Facilities 7 Table 2 1994 Existing Level of Service 10 Table 3 1 1995 Background Level of Service 15 Table 4 1 Trip Generation 18 Table 5 1995 Total Traffic Levels of Service 19 Table 6 Stacking Distance Analysis 95% 23 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ii ,[ s (i r 0 N � N U X MP M - - - - - MN ON r- MN • N NM • MN r ' September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Executive Summary Executive Summary ' Boston Chicken Northwest is proposing to develop a restaurant on the west side of Pacific Highway (Highway 99W) just north of the SW Gaarde Street intersection in Tigard, Oregon. ' The development includes a 3,361 - square -foot sit - down /take -out restaurant. A single full -ac- cess driveway is proposed to serve the site from Highway 99W, while auxiliary access to SW Gaarde Street can be attained via an existing driveway used by adjacent property to the south that is currently occupied by a bookstore and florist shop. Based on the results of the traffic impact analysis described in this report, Kittelson & ' Associates, Inc. concluded that the proposed Boston Chicken Restaurant can be developed while acceptable levels of .service and safety are maintained at the site driveway and on the surrounding transportation system. The analysis resulted in the following findings and recom- mendations: • The proposed restaurant will generate approximately 2,125 daily trips, 180 weekday a.m. peak hour trips, and 125 weekday p.m. peak hour trips of which 1,275, 110, and 75 trips, respectively, are considered new trips. • All of the intersections within the study area currently operate at acceptable levels of t service and will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service under full - buildout conditions under the proposed Full - Access Scenario. • The Highway 99W Access Driveway, which already exists, will operate in a safe and efficient manner under either the Full - Access Scenario or Right -In, Right -Out (RIRO) Access Scenario; however, the full- access driveway will provide easier access and decrease the number of site - generated trips entering the SW Gaarde Street -SW McDon- ald Street /Highway 99W intersection during the peak hour conditions. The full- access driveway also will result in improved operations and better levels of service for drivers on Highway 99W. For this reason, we recommend that the existing full- access driveway to the parcel be maintained for the proposed development. • The Oregon Department of Transportation's (ODOT) proposed future Highway 99W joint- access driveway with the parcel immediately to the north of the proposed site, at the time of redevelopment of that parcel, can be accommodated under the proposed site plan without adverse effects to the on -site circulation. 1 • The proposed site plan adequately addresses the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit issues in accordance with the Transportation Planning Rule to effectively accommodate travel to and from the site by various modes. 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 2 1 J _. . -tea c O 0 U V O L M On En an r MN NM ON MN I M rr —• r M• Ma • ' September 1994 Boston Chicken-SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Introduction Introduction 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed site plans call for the construction of a 3,361- square -foot restaurant. The current proposed site plan is designed to have one full - access driveway on Highway 99W located approximately 270 feet north of the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street ' and Highway 99W and one shared access driveway via an existing driveway onto SW Gaarde Street. Initial site construction is expected to begin in early 1995 with the completion and opening of the restaurant in mid 1995. SCOPE OF THE REPORT The purpose of this analysis is to determine the traffic- related impacts of the proposed Boston Chicken restaurant on the west side of Highway 99W just north of the SW Gaarde Street intersection in Tigard, Oregon. The development is to be located adjacent to an existing ' commercial /retail plaza. Figure 1 shows the site vicinity map for the proposed development. Specific issues discussed in this report include: • Existing and future traffic conditions in the site vicinity under the proposed access scheme in the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours. • Traffic operations for 1995 background traffic conditions without the development of ' the proposed restaurant. • Trip characteristic estimates for the 3,361 - square -foot restaurant. ' • Operational issues at the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/ Highway 99W and the site access driveways. • Future off -site improvements and crossover easements for joint access driveways on Highway 99W. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 4 1 1 0 ' NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 4cm SEE ui SITE �F I - W • ! T T BULL MOUNTAI ,� J e la •M RD. I INSET r/r//fffy/ S.W. GAARDE ST. 5) S.W. MCDONALD ST. 0 3 i. SITE VICINITY BOSTON CHI CKEN NST HIGHWAY 99W - SW GAARDE ORTHWE STREET FIGURE SEPTEMBER 1994 1 ■L�KJ ' 1 1327F001 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 J. JL 1 1 1 1 1 1 S ection 3 1 17/ 1 Existin g Conditions NN 1 1 . . 1 September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Existing Conditions I Existing Conditions SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES I The proposed site is currently occupied by a used car dealership and is zoned general- commer- cial. The site is bordered to the east by Highway 99W and by residential property to the west. The proposed development will border an existing bookstore and florist shop to the south and 1 a commercial /retail plaza to the north of the site. There is a childcare facility to the north and west of the site that currently uses the access driveway of the commercial /retail plaza. The proposed site is located along a highly commercialized section of Highway 99W, which I includes several offices, service - oriented facilities, and retail stores. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES I The primary roadway providing access to the proposed site is Highway 99W. In the site vicinity, Highway 99W is a five -lane roadway classified by ODOT as a primary highway under I Access Oregon Highway Policy. Table 1 is a summary of the transportation facilities within the site vicinity. Figure 2 shows the existing transportation system and lane configurations. I Table 1 Existing Transportation Facilities I Name Classification Cross Speed (mph) Side Bicycle On- Street Section Walks Lanes Parking Pacific Highway (99W) - Primary ' 65 feet - 40 - YES 'YES NO 1 Highway SW Gaarde St- Major 45 feet 35 Intermittent NO NO SW McDonald St Collector 1 ' PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITY 1 Field observations in the vicinity of the proposed project site revealed a relatively small amount of pedestrian and bicycle activity near the proposed site. Highway 99W currently has sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides of the roadway in the site vicinity. SW Gaarde Street has I intermittent sidewalks near the site vicinity. It is expected that this development will have a minimal impact on these travel modes. TRANSIT FACILITIES I Tri -Met provides service to downtown Portland and Sherwood with stops just north and south of the SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W intersection. Route 12, Barbur Boulevard, operates between 5:00 a.m and 12:00 a.m. during the week. During the a.m. peak I period (7 to 9 a.m.), service is provided at 3- to 30- minute headways in the northbound direction and 12- to 40- minute headways in the southbound direction. During the p.m. peak period (4 to 6 p.m.), service is provided at 14- to 15- minute headways in the northbound direction and I 2- to 18- minute headways in the southbound direction. Saturday service is provided at approximately 30- minute headways in both directions. The site is also served by Route 95X, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 7 1 I I 0 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 1 1 1 1 S / T E /j DRIVEWAY 1 4/ / rr S.W. GAARDE ST. S.W. MCDONALD ST. I T41A6, cbcl 1 lj �� �Z I rr 1 LEGEND Traffic Signal mi. Stop Sign 1 EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS BOSTON CHICKEN NORTHWEST 1 FIGURE I 17. HIGHWAY 99W — SW GAARDE STREET 1 SEPTEMBER 1994 1327F002 September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Existing Conditions ' Tigard Express, which provides weekday service with the nearest stop at the intersection of Highway 99W /SW Durham Road to the south of the site. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS ' The analysis focused on the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour manual traffic counts were conducted between 7 and 9 a.m. and 4 and 6 p.m. on a mid -week day. The existing weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W and at the existing site driveways are shown in Figure 3. Current Levels of Service All level -of- service (LOS) analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures stated in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 1). A description of LOS and the criteria by which they are determined is presented in Appendix A. The appendix also includes a discussion of how LOS is measured and what is generally considered the acceptable range of LOS. In addition, the intersections and access driveways were analyzed under ODOT's adopted SIGCAP methodology. The SIGCAP results are shown in Appendix B. To ensure that this analysis was based on a reasonable worst -case scenario, the peak 15- minute flow rate during the weekday p.m. and weekday a.m. peak hours was used in the evaluation of all of the intersection level -of- service analyses. For this reason, the analyses reflect conditions that are only likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average weekday a.m. peak hour and weekday p.m. peak hour. Traffic conditions during all other weekday time periods and throughout the weekend will likely operate under better conditions than described in this report. The signalized intersection levels of service provided both the average delay and degree of saturation occurring during the peak hour conditions. The unsignalized intersection levels -of- service are indicated by reserve capacity. Table 2 shows the existing weekday a.m. and p.m. levels of service at the SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W intersection. 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 9 1 1 . I 0 NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) i.", cs` f v v I r 1 <5. r I L / - / 235 41-- 305 j DRIVEWAY 1yn 1 S.W. GAARDE 5T. fl S.W. MCDONALD ST. �� 0 ss1 �O /70...... ` 60 r <5 � ~ 75 1 t4 ma 1 y —80 / co / r ?g I _ a 'n 1 V 1 WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR I 1 0 NORTH I (NOT TO SCALE) o to co vs. �. 41I cs 10 0 5 � V V } < d \L � <5 Kr< - ) 215 —► .4— 535 DRIVEWAY :0 I 1 S.W. GAARDE ST. S.W. MCDONALD ST. o 0 j 75- 1 % c 1 25 IL 1a 15 7 �► zo 1 ��' ^h r 15 5 ' J6s I ,r M 1 ‘ *o5 l WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR I ...........y h 1 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES B OOHICK NH 1 H IGSTHWAY N C 99W EN — SW ORT GAARDE TREET Z SEPTEMBER 1994 J 1327F003 I September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Existing Conditions 1 Table 2 1994 Existing Level of Service I Signalized Unsignalized ' Intersection Delay V/C LOS Reserve Capacity LOS 1 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR SW Gaarde St -SW McDonald St / 17.1 0.81 C . . Highway 99W � v ., I Access Driveway /Highway 99W 173 D Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St. ':', ' , 596 A WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SW Gaarde St -SW McDonald St / 32.1 0.92 D I Highway 99W Access Driveway /Highway 99W 147 D Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St. „':: _., . ,::`;.: : = ,, > ; .: „.<-: 397 B 1 1 As shown in Table 2, the intersections and existing access driveways within the study area operate at acceptable levels -of- service during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. 1 PLANNED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS There are no - known, - funded transportation improvements within the study area that are 1 expected to influence future traffic patterns. The only planned development within the influence area of the proposed site is a possible expansion of a Ripley's Furniture store to the south of the SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W intersection. It is not 1 expected that this development will adversely affect the operation of the intersection. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 Section 4 D Traffic Impact Analysis P Y 1 1 ' September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis The effects of traffic enerated by the proposed restaurant development during the typical g Y P P P g YP ' weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods were analyzed as follows: • Based on the proposed size of the restaurant, the total number of future weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips were estimated for complete build -out of the site. 1 • Background peak hour traffic estimates for the year 1995 were chosen as the basis for comparison. A growth factor of 3 percent was used to account for future traffic growth ' within the study area. • Estimated site - generated traffic was added to the 1995 background volumes to deter- mine the traffic operation levels at the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald 1 Street/Highway 99W and at the site access driveways. • Internal site circulation and the access point location were evaluated for potential safety ' or operational deficiencies. • Off -site operational and circulation issues were examined for potential mitigation treatments. Additionally, the existing right -turn deceleration lane for the SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W southbound approach was evaluated for adequate storage and transition length. • Two access alternatives were evaluated in accordance with ODOT Traffic Impact Study requirements. The methodologies and results of the analyses listed above are described in detail in the remainder of this section. 1995 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC The 1995 background volumes were projected to account for continued growth in the area. ' After reviewing historical traffic volume data, a 3 percent global growth rate was selected to appropriately account for additional traffic volumes in the site vicinity. The growth rate was applied to the existing traffic volumes shown in Figure 3. This growth rate incorporates forecast 1 site - generated traffic from the expansion of Ripley's Furniture. Figure 4 shows the projected 1995 background traffic volumes for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods. 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 13 1 I ' NORTH 0 (NOT TO SCALE) 1 cs ( ♦ } • <SJ� � � � <5 j • �p I 240► ♦- 315 j DRIVEWAY �~ 1 S.W. GAARDE ST. Mk S.W. MCDONALD ST. v �1 1 65 I 41, 1 A 17$� 4. <5� X 80 y �� f 80 1 m� 3001 _ ° _ 1 V I WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR I 1 0 I (NOT TO NORTH SCALE) c 4 i/ n U1 VS), I <s...it d IL <s ' 220 550 rifill DRIVEWAY 1 S.W. GAARDE ST. S.W. MCDONALD ST. N U 1 75. Al l %k {P 1 30 IL 145 1 / 15 .)11 ~ 0 4. ^ n om • f 1 60 1 T!. 0 0 h 3 n ^ M 1 V [ WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR I 1 1995 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES BOSTON CHICKEN NORTHWEST 1 FIGURE 1 HIGHWAY 99W - SW GAARDE STREET SEPTEMBER 1994 1327F004 1 September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Traffic Impact Analysis 1 Level -of- Service Analysis Table 3 shows the 1995 background levels of service for both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak 1 hour conditions. I Table 3 1995 Background Level of Service I Signalized Unsignallzed Intersection Delay V/C LOS Reserve Capacity LOS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR I SW Gaarde St -SW McDonald St / 17.9 0.84 C Highway 99W I Access Driveway /Highway 99W 173 D Shared Access Driveway /Highway 99W 586 A I WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SW Gaarde St SW McDonald St / 34.2 0.95 D Highway 99W , 1 Access Driveway /Highway 99W 145 D Shared Access Driveway /Highway 99W 385 B 1 As shown in Table 3, the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street /Highway 99W will operate at an acceptable level of service during both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. I PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLANS I The current proposed site plan calls for the proposed Boston Chicken restaurant development to be constructed in early 1995 and open in mid 1995. The restaurant is designed to have one full- access driveway on Highway 99W and a shared access driveway to SW Gaarde Street. I This restaurant will comprise approximately 3,360 square feet of floor space and 59 on -site parking spaces, including two handicapped spaces with wheel chair ramps. The restaurant will also include a drive - through window, which will operate on the south side of the facility with I counter - clockwise traffic circulation. The drive - through lane provides stacking for up to eight vehicles. On -site pedestrian and bicycle facilities are provided on the proposed site plan with easy access to both Highway 99W and SW Gaarde Street. Additionally, a 40 -foot cross -over I easement will be provided to both the northern and southern parcels. Figure 5 is an illustration of the proposed site plan for the restaurant. 1 TRIP GENERATION The proposed Boston Chicken restaurant will provide both sit -down and drive - through dining. I Estimates of weekday a.m. peak hour and weekday p.m. peak hour vehicle trips ends for the proposed restaurant were developed from empirical observations at similar restaurant develop- ' Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 15 1 / ( >/ 0 � / / / NORTH \\ \\\\\\\ \\\\\\ -.11111140 \ 67116 ) (BO I // b / I O ' — ]]]] / I I / SIGN 1Z//0"/// / / / / I 12 1r - - _ I r,, l 41111P I 20 -2• I g 12' b (5 2 ; T : 18' II'-b' 19' I' 115' 18 . ' , i} .i , i / �� / - � I, � PROPOSED . • i - /c i \,1 / j / \ / (� / / /// 690 IGKEII I - - 1 / / I r� 1 4 ‘ �I — I ` '' PY N 5 iIDE S I . I - I (SEE PYLON IG AGE 5HT J \ LINE OF RE- LI NMENT OF P • KINAL 1 p T RE 7 MENT S .4 .. ® / C JTUR O NSTRLIC i l j,/ \\*;\.\\\ r I / - / / / / / �� SIDEWALK / / / 1 - *:415 AREA TC B_ RE- STRIPPED TO PRCVIDE \. /' / 'q, / / / .SIN FeRK h AND A DRIVE LANE CONNECTION \ *- / TO GAARGE + ' 5T ExI5TIN6 ENTRANCE TO ///"' / / REMAIN n,E SAME. ADDITIONAL 4�R/EYING < FVTVRE EASEMENT / / / ✓:ILL BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE AN OVERALL -_ ® _ , //y / / / I/ FAR/;ING LAYOUT. / /; / / / /•' EXISTING TO ADJACENT LOT , 'i PARKING / i 4 / / ' I `— , ; / / A. C---J 1 / / ' 4.)/ // , 1 ..____._l ' EXISTING / /� / v / � _ BUILDING � \ \� T / / / P-' / / / `` / EXISnNS / 1 _ ..,�� ENTRA:;:F� % � / ` / SITE DATA � �� \ \ \ \ \ \ SITE AREA : (1.281 ACRES) 56,574 S.F. — — � — BUILDING AREA 3,361 S.F. _ _ _ / PARK'G PROVIDED : 51 SPADES _ �__ / HANDICAPPED PROVIDED : 2 SPACES �_ _ / TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED : 51 SPACES I CT,4� - _ - - - - A PARKING RATIO 11.55 SPAG!=S ; 1,000 S.F. _ 'Ns...) I SITE COVERAGE : 6.0 90 1 SITE PLAN ' BOSTON CHICKEN NORTHWEST Figure HIGHWAY 99W - SW GAARDE STREET SEPTEMBER 1994 1327F005 1 September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Traffic Impact Analysis ments. These observations are summarized in Trip Generation, 5th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (Reference 2). The site - generated traffic is divided into three basic trip types: 1. Drop -in Trips— These trips currently exist on the roadways that provide primary access to ' the restaurant and are being made for some purpose other than visiting the facility (for example, work -to- home). Drop -in trips do not result in any increase in background traffic volumes within the study area. In fact, the only impact of these drop -in trips occurs at the site driveways, ' where they become turning movements. Therefore, drop -in trips typically have no additional effect on the road system beyond the development's driveways. 2. Diverted Trips— These trips are currently being drawn to other restaurants in the vicinity that compete with the proposed facility, but are redirected to the new facility when it opens. This redirection usually occurs because of an improvement in convenience and proximity for the affected drivers. Diverted trips will result in an increase in traffic volumes within the immediate vicinity of the site, but will also result in a decrease in traffic volumes at other locations within the area (i.e., at restaurants where drivers previously ate). Therefore, this component of the total generated demand causes no change in the total number of vehicle trips within the area, even though it may add to the number of trips in the immediate site vicinity. Another side benefit is that, by diverting, these trips often cause a net reduction in total vehicle - miles - travelled on the areas of the transportation system. This is a common sense observation, as it is difficult to imagine that many drivers would divert to a new restaurant to travel a greater distance than they did previously. ' 3. New Trips— These trips would not have been made without the existence of the proposed facility. Therefore, this is the only trip type that results in a net increase in the total number of trips made within the area: These are also the only trips that represent additional vehicle.miles 1 of travel on the transportation system. It should be noted that the actual drop -in trip percentages along Highway 99W are potentially as high as 60 to 70 percent; however, to remain conservative, the study used a 40 percent drop -in trip rate. Additionally, all diverted trips were accounted for as being new trips on the surrounding transportation system. Table 4 shows the estimated weekday a.m. peak hour and weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation characteristics for the proposed restaurant. 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 17 I September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Traffic Impact Analysis I Table 4 Trip Generation I Land Use Size ITE • Daily Peak Hour Trips Code Trips Total Inbound Outbound I Fast Food Restaurant with WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR 3,360 834 2125 180 90 90 Drive - Through Window I Drop -in Trips (40 %) 850 70 35 35 Net New Trips :`�• ; ` ` = a: 1275 1 10 55 55 1 WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR Fast Food Restaurant with 3,360 834 2125 125 65 60 Drive - Through Window Drop -in Trips (40 %) 850 50 25 25 1 : • tai x �ti ' �. ": .:: � Net New Trips ^* : ..; `,, : •' ,'; -..� . 1275 75 40 35 1 As shown in Table 4, the proposed restaurant will generate approximately 2,125 daily trips, of I which 180 will be weekday a.m. peak hour trips and 125 will be weekday p.m. peak hour trips, with approximately 1,275, 110, and 75, respectively, being considered net new trips. It should be noted that site- generated traffic from the former use as a used car dealership were not I subtracted from the background traffic volumes because volume counts indicated that site -gen- erated traffic had little to no effect on peak hour traffic. I ALTERNATIVE ACCESS SCENARIOS Two alternative access scenarios were developed for the proposed development. The alterna- I tives included: • Full - Access Driveway Scenario. This scenario preserves the existing access driveway to the parcel which allows traffic to freely enter the site from Highway 99W from either 1 the northbound or southbound direction. This access scenario would result in the least amount of traffic travelling through the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W. I • Right -in, Right -out (RIRO) Access Driveway Scenario. This scenario would allow right turns in and out of the site from southbound Highway 99W. This restricted access I driveway would provide excellent access to and from the site; however, the restriction on left -in and out movements would increase traffic through the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W. 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 18 I September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Traffic Impact Analysis 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION /ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS The distribution of site - generated trips onto the roadway system within the study impact area I was estimated through examination of the anticipated market area relative to the future traffic conditions. Discussions with Boston Chicken Northwest were also held to review the potential market area for the proposed restaurant. Designated drop -in trips were assumed to come from I traffic already travelling on Highway 99W. Figure 6 shows the estimated trip distribution pattern during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Figure 7 shows the site - generated traffic assignments for the proposed restaurant under both access scenarios. I TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES /OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS I The 1995 background traffic volumes for the weekday a.m. and weekday p.m. peak hours shown in Figure 4 were added to the site - generated traffic shown in Figure 7 to arrive at the 1995 total traffic volumes shown in Figure 8. Table 5 indicates the 1995 total traffic levels of 1 service with the proposed restaurant. Table 5 I 1995 Total Traffic Levels of Service Signalized Unsignalized t Intersection Delay V/C LOS Reserve Capacity LOS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR 1 SW Gaarde - McDonald St/Highway 99W Full Access Scenario 18.8 0.85 C . RIRO.Scenario 19.9 - 0.85 • .0 ,• I Access Driveway /Highway 99W `'' Full Access Scenario 60 E RIRO Scenario 528 A I Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Full AccessScenario 579 A RIRO Scenario 400 A 1 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SW Gaarde - McDonald St/Highway 99W Full Access Scenario 35.5 0.96 D 1 RIRO Scenario 39.3 0.99 D Access Driveway /Highway 99W ::" • :: Full Access Scenario 72 E I RIRO Scenario 227 C Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Full Access Scenario 376 B RIRO Scenario 299 C I As shown in Table 5, the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street /Highway 99W will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during all peak periods under the t Full - Access Scenario; however, the increased amount of out -of- direction trips generated by the RIRO Access Scenario deteriorates the SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W I Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 19 1 ' NORTH (NOT TO SCALE) 1 1 1 44 P 1 O o \o iffer DRIVEWAY 11, S.W. GAARDE ST. S.W. MCDONALD ST. 1 -"\IV 4 .111 0 0 A 1111.4 15% 3 25 1 1 1 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION (NEW TRIPS ONLY) BOSTON CHICKEN NORTHWEST I FIGURE pa HIGHWAY 99W - SW GAARDE STREET 6 1 SEPTEMBER 1994 1327F006 1 1 1 o NORTH 0 c e (NOT TO SCALE) 1 (10)10) I L 5(55) 1 /Air • DRIVEWAY 1 1 rts ),13 1 S.W. GAARDE ST. S.W. MCDONALD ST. y o" y / ti ry 1 I a.46* - v=�° S. -' 1 C, <5 I (5 )5 N 1 0 c ° / 1 WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR I 111 0 NORTH ,� N (NOT TO SCALE) • 1 ‘■ (5)5_/ I L 5(35) 1 Ijoof DRIVEWAY h `y ry `L rt 1 �s .,r Ok i S.W. GAARDE ST. S.W. MCDONALD ST. 1 1 h � 0 q put h I / 55 25,<5_,/, 1 1 ~ 5 ( 15 ) 1 I N r [ WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR I 1 1 XX — Full Access Scenario SITE- GENERATED TRAFFIC (XX) - RIRO Access Scenario BOSTON CHICKEN NORTHWEST 1 FIGURE I p HIGHWAY 99W — SW GAARDE STREET 7 1 SEPTEMBER 1994 1327F007 1 1 / f : 47.3 0 ^ h O h NORTH ° 4,... �� (NOT TO SCALE) Al (3`3)36 1 (10)10) 5(55) (240)240 -► 4- 315(315) / K*---- iffr< i yob 1 DRIVEWAY 1 0 S.W. GAARDE ST. . r�o - S.W. MCDONALD ST. e e o y (t r I L I /\ Q. (5)5 0f 6o (:to i i � * or — 80190 -Joo 1 , no h N n b h �`° .. I o 0 co I WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR I 1 0 ti ■` .) 0 NORTH. .n N N 1 0 (NOT TO SCALE) I rao)3p 5. �i( (220) r 550(550) l i / '''•••■ al 1 (15)15 h� DRIVEWAY o N - o S.W. GAARDE ST. o ` er ,. 1 T . S.W. MCDONALD ST ( 30 1 r I 1 L Cr _ 155 145 r.r, j r � • a � f ? 60 16p tir ^ry M r �h 1 (NO C M � •N.. Z1 m I WE EKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR I I , . 1 XX — Full Access Scenario 1995 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES (XX) - RIRO Access Scenario BOSTON CHICKEN NORTHWEST I FIGURE IKI HIGHWAY 99W — SW GAARDE STREET Q SEPTEMBER 1994 U 1327F008 I September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Traffic Impact Analysis 1 intersection to an unacceptable Level -of- Service "D" during the weekday p.m. peak hour conditions. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing full- access driveway to the site be preserved under the proposed development. The site access driveways operate at acceptable 1 levels of service during both peak periods under both access scenarios. I QUEUING /STACKING DISTANCE ANALYSIS An analysis was conducted at the intersection of SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street /High- 1 way 99W to ensure that adequate stacking distance is provided on the southbound and eastbound approaches. In the analysis, a Poisson distribution was applied to the vehicles arriving in each of these approaches to determine the probable queue lengths. The assumed I length -of -red interval was taken from the signal timing parameters used in the level -of- service analysis with one vehicle assumed to occupy approximately 25 feet. The queue length was estimated to a 95% confidence level. This means that 95% of the time the queue length will I be at or below the value calculated for the various movements. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 6. Table 6 I Stacking Distance Analysis 95% I Queue Length Available Intersection /Movement (feet) Storage (feet) OK WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR I SW Gaarde St -SW McDonald St/ Highway 99W Southbound LT 125 225 YES I Southbound TH 200 >500 YES Eastbound LT 100 150 YES Eastbound TH /RT 100 170 YES WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR 1 SW Gaarde St -SW McDonald St/ Highway 99W Southbound LT 225 225 YES I Southbound TH 500 >500 YES Eastbound LT 150 150 YES Eastbound TH /RT 125 170 YES 1 As shown in Table 6, the length of the southbound left -turn queue will not exceed the 225 feet 1 currently available; therefore, the full- access scenario will operate efficiently without being interrupted by southbound left -turn queues from the SW Gaarde Street /SW McDonald Street/Highway 99W signalized intersections. I INTERNAL CIRCULATION 1 The location and operation of the drive - through window is the most critical internal circulation issue for restaurant sites such as Boston Chicken. For this reason, the proposed site plan was 1 reviewed for drive - through operations and queuing. The proposed drive - through provides storage distance for up to 8 vehicles behind the pick -up window. A study of 44 fast -food I Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 23 September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Traffic Impact Analysis 1 restaurants with drive - through windows conducted by the City of Portland in 1984 (Reference 3) indicated a maximum queue at a drive - through of 10 vehicles. Further, the study recom- ' mended that providing storage for up to 8 vehicles would be adequate 98 percent of the time. The results of that study indicate that the proposed drive - through storage is adequate to ensure that queues from the drive - through will not interfere with parking maneuvers or operations at site driveways. Further, the proposed drive - through is located to result in the least interference with on -site pedestrian activity. On -site circulation under the ODOT's proposed joint- access driveway with the parcel to the 1 north of the site was also examined. The circulation analysis indicated that the joint access with the northern parcel could be accommodated under the proposed site plan with no effect ' on parking or on -site circulation. OFF -SITE OPERATIONAL ISSUES From queuing analysis and field observations, it appears that there is a conflict between southbound left turns at the SW Gaarde Street -SW McDonald Street /Highway 99W signalized intersection and left -turns into the primary site access driveway under the Full - Access Scenario. This conflict can be minimized by striping of the center left -turn lane to provide a transition taper for the southbound left -turns and a definite two -way left -turn area for access to the site. ' PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLIST, AND TRANSIT ISSUES From field observations, it was noted that there are adequate pathways to the local neighbor- hoods for both pedestrians and bicyclists to access the proposed site. Also, there is excellent transit access to the.site with frequent service in both the northbound and southbound directions. ' The location of the bus routes, combined with the presence of bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the site vicinity, will provide continuous access to the proposed site for all modes of transportation. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 24 . .• - N „ • 1 1 D U) c al U a) oc Ch _ C E 0 0 U CC ow am NE ow r as ow um No EN sr an • l• — am No Ns ' September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W Conclusions and Recommendations 1 Conclusions and Recommendations 1 The results of the traffic impact analysis described in this report indicate that the proposed Boston Chicken Restaurant can be developed while acceptable levels of service and safety are ' maintained at the site driveway and on the surrounding transportation system. The analysis resulted in the following findings and recommendations: • The proposed restaurant will generate approximately 2,125 daily trips, 180 weekday ' a.m. peak hour trips, and 125 weekday p.m. peak hour trips of which 1,275, 110, and 75 trips, respectively, are considered new trips. ' • All of the intersections within the study area currently operate at acceptable levels of service and will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service under full - buildout conditions under the proposed Full - Access Scenario. 1 • The Highway 99W Access Driveway, which already exists, will operate in a safe and efficient manner under either the Full - Access Scenario or Right -In, Right -Out (RIRO) ' Access Scenario; however, the full- access driveway will provide easier access and decrease the number of site - generated trips entering the SW Gaarde Street -SW McDon- ald Street/Highway 99W intersection during the peak hour conditions. The full- access driveway also will result in improved operations and better levels of service for drivers on Highway 99W. For this reason, we recommend that the existing full- access driveway to the parcel be maintained for the proposed development. • When the parcel directly north of the site is redeveloped, ODOT's proposed Highway 99W joint- access driveway can be accommodated under the proposed site plan without adverse effects to the on -site circulation. • The proposed site plan adequate addresses the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit issues in accordance with the Transportation Planning Rule to effectively accommodate travel to and from the site by various modes. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 26 MO • MI OM = N — — MI OM r— OM • MO r— MI Ell 10 el 0 m 0 CD 0 3 N 0) l( I a. . :I ' September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W References 1 References 1. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report No. 209. 1985. 2. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Manual. Fifth Edition. 1990. 3. City of Portland Bureau of Traffic Management. Restaurant Service Window Storage 1 Requirements. Technical Report DT 84 -8. 1984. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D A ppendix A .. 1 Description of Level -of- Service HCM Methods and Criteria • 1 ' September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde St. /Highway 99W Appendix A ' Appendix A Level of Service Concept ' Level of service (LOS) is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort (including such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or roadway segment. Six grades are used to denote the various LOS from A to F. ' Table Al Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street A Very low average stopped delay, less than five seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. ' B Average stop delay is in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for a LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. ' C Average stopped delay is in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression and /or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many • still pass through the intersection without stopping. ' D Average stopped delays are in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle length, or high volume /capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Average stopped delays are in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume /capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Average stop delay is in excess of 60 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable ' to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation. It may also occur at high I volume /capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay levels. 1 1 1 1 Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209 (1985). Kittelson & Associates, Inc. A -1 ' September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde St. /Highway 99W Appendix A ' Signalized Intersections The six LOS grades are described qualitatively for signalized intersections in Table Al. 1 Additionally, Table A2 identifies the relationship between level of service and average stopped delay per vehicle. Using this definition, a "D" LOS is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. r 1 r ' Table A2 Level -of- Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Stopped Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A <_ 5.0 r B 5.1 to 15.0 15.1 to 25.0 ' D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.1 to 60.0 ' F >60.0 r r 1 1 i 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. A -2 ' September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde St. /Highway 99W Appendix A Unsignalized Intersections The calculation of LOS at an unsignalized intersection requires a different approach. The 1985 ' Highway Capacity Manual includes a methodology for calculating the LOS at two -way, stop - controlled intersections. For these unsignalized intersections, LOS is defined using the concept of "reserve capacity" (i.e., that portion of available hourly capacity that is not used). ' A qualitative description of the various service levels associated with an unsignalized intersec- tion is presented in Table A3. A quantitative definition of LOS for an unsignalized intersection is presented in Table A4. 1 Table A3 General Level -of- Service Descriptions for Unsignalized Intersections ' Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street 1 A • Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation. • Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in the queue. B • Some drivers begin to consider the delay an inconvenience. • Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in the queue. ' C • Many times there is more than one vehicle in the queue. • Most drivers feel restricted, but not objectionably so. ' D • Often there is more than one vehicle in the queue. • Drivers feel quite restricted. E • Represents a condition in which the demand is near or equal to the probable maximum ' number of vehicles that can be accomodated by the movement. • There is almost always more than one vehicle in the queue. • Drivers find the delays approaching intolerable levels. F • Forced flow. • Represents an intersection failure condition that is caused by geometric and/or operational constraints external to the intersection. 111 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. A -3 September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde St. /Highway 99W Appendix A 1 Table A4 Level -of- Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Reserve Capacity Expected Delay to Minor Street Traffic ' (pcph) Level of Service <_ 400 A Little or no delay 1 300 -399 B Short traffic delays 200 -299 C Average traffic delays 1 100 -199 D Long traffic delays 0 -99 E Very long traffic delays * F * *When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered, with queueing that may cause severe congestion and affect other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants intersection improvement. 1 The reserve capacity applies only to an individual traffic movement or to shared lane P Y conce t P PP Y movements. Once the LOS, expected delay of all the individual movements have been calculated, an overall evaluation of the intersection can be made. Normally, the movement having the worst LOS defines the overall evaluation, but this may be tempered by engineering 1 judgment. An "E" LOS is generally considered to represent the minimum acceptable design standard. • Experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates this methodology is conservative 1 in that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems. This is especially true for minor - street, left -turn movements. For example, the Highway Capacity Manual method- ology does not take into account the effects of vehicle flow platoons that result from upstream ' signalization. Vehicles traveling in platoons tend to create greater gaps in the traffic flow, which sometimes provide additional capacity for the side closest to the signal. Therefore, the results of any unsignalized intersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind. 1 Generally, LOS E for the minor- street, left -turn movement is considered to be acceptable for an unsignalized intersection, although it also indicates that the need for signalization should be investigated. 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. A-4 1 September 1994 Boston Chicken-SW Gaarde St. /Highway 99W Appendix A 1 All -Way Stop Controlled Intersections I There is no accepted procedure for a level -of- service analysis of an all -way, stop - controlled intersection. The procedure used for determining LOS for a four -way or three -way stop -con- trolled intersection differs from that described for unsignalized intersections. This methodol- ogy, which is being reviewed by the Unsignalized Intersection Committee of the Transportation Research Board, uses a capacity estimation method based on headways observed at all -way, stop - controlled intersections in the western United States. The procedure incorporates several I important variables, including volume distribution, number of lanes on each approach, and the percentage of right and left turns at the intersection. Intersection performance is measured in parameters similar to signalized intersections: delay, volume -to- capacity ratio, and Level of I Service using a scale of "A" through "F ". Approach delay on any given leg of the intersection is calculated using the following equation: 1 D = exp (3.8 x C ) I WhereD = vehicle delay on a given approach (sec /veh) SV= subject approach volume (vehicles per hour [vph]) I C= calculated approach capacity (vph) exp =base of natural logarithms I In this equation, the quantity SV /C is simply the volume -to- capacity ratio on the approach under consideration. Table A5 presents the LOS criteria for all -way, stop - controlled intersections. 1 Table AS 1 Level -of- Service Definitions (All -way, Stop - Controlled Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street 1 A < 5 Seconds B 5 to 10 Seconds I C 10 to 20 Seconds 20 to 30 Seconds I D E 30 to 45 Seconds F > 45 Seconds 1 1 I 2 Kyte, Michael, Estimating Capacity and Delay at an All -Way Stop- Controlled Intersection. University of Idaho, Depart- ment of Civil Engineering Research Report September 1989. I Kittelson & Associates, Inc. A -5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix B ZVA 1 SIGCAP Level -of- Service Results N 1 1 I September 1994 Boston Chicken-SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W References I Table A 1994 Existing Levels of Service SIGCAP Sgnalized Unsignalized Intersection V/C LOS Reserve Capacity LOS 1 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR SW Gaarde- McDonald St/ 0.85 D -E I Highway 99W � WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SW Gaarde - McDonald St/Highway 99W 0.89 E 1 1 1 Table B 1995 Background Levels of Service 1 SIGCAP Sgnalized Unsignalized I Intersection V/C LOS Reserve Capacity LOS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR I SW Gaarde- McDonald St/ 0.87 D -E Highway 99W WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR I SW Gaarde - McDonald St/ 0.91 E `:< ", :. ,.`. _. Highway 99W 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1 September 1994 Boston Chicken -SW Gaarde Street/Highway 99W References 1 Table C 1995 Total Traffic Levels of Service SIGCAP Sgnalized Unsignalized Intersection V/C LOS Reserve Capacity LOS WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR SW Gaarde- McDonald St/Highway 99W Full Access Scenario 0.87 D -E RIRO Scenario 0.86 D -E WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR SW Gaarde- McDonald St/Highway 99W Full AccessScenario 0.92 E RIRO Scenario 0.95 E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix C D Traffic Impact Study/Traffic Count Data 1 . , 1 TIA INVENTORY SHEET I Project Name: $C Met-ri.uat T KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. il Project Number: Mt* 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: 044 Portland, Oregon 97205 I Date: fls/s} (503) 228 -5230 Filename: C: \QPW\TIA94RON.WB1 Fax: (503) 273 -8169 I SITE VICINITY MAP INTERSECTIONS: Land Use Street Network Bus Routes /Stops Lane Configurations Control Type Progression Signal Phasing Storage for RT and LT lanes 1 t..160 :' 1) ,(�� 2) 4, !.• 4 1.460- w iNS-V D ..: l 1 a = pIvJ 143 vet. ✓ mot IS D 1 I i it./ �' 6uA ✓AR lm ^ V\ 6 C Do l - �� I j D/ 3) 4) obi-' i Q (IeA 6i;' .. 0 ivi_ t-4-- + 1 • ; i - I ? 4 w u 1 -tu 1 5) 6) NOTES: 5 99 kr a AA's V, I A- 6o Er tel bbt-D' Z17' t2-1-- 7"P.f -- 1 90 i `T -L n r''` I A.,e)r$15..5 j STREETS: - • w u� II Street Name Classification `�" Cross Posted Side- Bike On- Street Number of Lanes Section Speed walks Lanes Parking and Lane Width I 11vi 141° e' er , 65 4 ‘i 1 1 iw Ciot.at - WA"' , c.166, CIS 3 5 4- Ni IAIal" f-'" 2 . ' AJ '1 1 1 AUG -25 -1994 10 36 BC NORTHWEST P.01 Oa r(1 -..ri _ t IOC fit < ..I ! l r Facsimile Cover Sheet 1 „Thj, tr ay>�:taik{t tit f.— s xa...n— ._ .'; +. Y W .; 1X , ., Fi',.i .. r ' , e! r? um Ai Company: Kittelson Phone: 503-228-5230 — . ... ' '�:'.:3: t: :.�x!r d-' } �,` .: . �t.' .6�.4tp ,,,,:eePf��,,:I �r - — ` :4 • • .. 'a r ay �M y .�s:....,..»:v:z. • iF1•.� ;ra�.�:..�i • a:rr: ,. .. r ... .. ..i;„Jxrf::Yzx From: Julie Martin Company: BC Northwest Phone: 206- 750 -0668 Fax: 206 - 750 -0324 Date: 8/25/94 Pages: 2 (Including cover page) Comments: Per your request, the following map shows trade area 16; Tigard. Please call the if you need additional information. 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 R -99% 08 -25 -94 10:40AM P001 #04 . -.- '&1 : ... - 1:;:n ! - i . 1 ,ib,. . - ' . It ...- . -, ,; • r -f. 1 ......r., t ... 4 . ' 1 & • tr..= • 44;" .$11%. I . pm • lir. 1 ( . U • .... Illt . 7. Prawn , • ,. • -, ., ..." II II r 1 ,:i - an d . i inlitiF-- ....• . 6 . Jai PO „ r „', - . Uit filui-• • •Aj'y . ' J - .:: plgii ' .. • Aim .'../,c i , - ii i k ".. .. 1 . ' r _: . .. Wi ••• 8 I 2 h LE5 4 s, e 1,,:- . . '"1 Y r iliptr .1116:1111 7 "4 4/Y : 1 111 7• ..-.'• I ..0. '.... . . I \ i • 1;1.:..rkill r 4 ,;1 . : 16 3 liw itpr Hi F , __,5_,.... . , - 44gialir .diti :1,_.* : . . .. _ipi,:.•- . IR , pm 1 i .,, to , , ,...... a4. telt 6-.4- . - .•wit .., I.4 iri•; ligikrtri. : :" .740; : , . ,. , :;:: • o 0 -••••••-. 1 ": ii . , I,Pde 1 , IR.. ,;*-hri a _ . ■ 41,40.7 --e - ,i•el.. , ;:;;.::_--.4 ..,. , a. --"" ' 1 • ' • g 0-- 41 167 11 % • :' •• fiel 4. • • Lit‘go 1 -• , g i CV . • aci": i•-- .. ,.,0,urri - °burl .44,PPWIri k '..g , . '',...; • : , i Mg III p. f ikingitp r itar, 7 1 • E 'ill • 4lr f " ° 44 . AriTIMe illigillIIM • - ' j.%... 7. i le 'L-tia .--k-.4. 4"ci if I _-.-p:/ : - itrarsores vole H . . A 11 . " °:. - ' t . '. ..ir P '-. i .- ..;:' Ilip - :;41111.'::,.. , '' I ' •-•,. - 1 ,: : ..111Cipr . Ilk PII pm il'' --_,..,.... rt. 'willow no •:e , s i ' 0. ".), &',--,.,..--,, ' '•-..-A' 7' t , 1 1 . 0r : ' liZit‘4‘ 1 -1 ...;44 fg• 1 .0 ..1.,,* - ,s• :,;,,Vj . " - . ■•■' 4 .., .' 4 , i.mt.0■• • oimp ._. J r aw,re.;--:1 AL:_. ,...!- 1 i •IcK - 711 V - APP . /71,1m . - • ... 1- 4111fir 1 Li. • ° - INIAx ;tag1 . ei:..1 4." ,pi. ..., WM HIM " ... r 24 '7,. ,'" 1 r fr wr_;r1.,,...1. -,., ii ... 1 ...c.. : -.-- 01 , -r_. - ''...., • r . --•-r= s k_' „. ' ‘ Z -r; , -.. ' - A .1 i ... 0.) kW. .. .. .. P :"*. , '',..- 4 '. ' c . •••,. ,,..4-,, ..s. ;.,, , :: .. 44'''' .'°. PP .F. RI - .. Al ...' • • " ` : '. •" IYA',......:• -:. ib cm -. ' ' . ' • •'. ' P,/ ;I' . ' -• • v . -lilt ilky„„cjanillre i , 1 : , r • r ,,.,. ,.„...-.1 let! . Ar ,L 1 k- • -111 fL‘3. s' , ,ri- .'44iiiiiiiGeoe 4 TEmn:147; 0 .r -;•.,,, ..' 0 • ,.. ,,,,,,:, 7,3-:+r, 1... 8 ttnuo or It l&le * . ..?4,,a;1 • - .."0 •trErztr.....-...f,,,,, ' •:. -- ', 1 • ..; ' --••••• 1 .. .IMTUDK.071 : - 7 1... ...... I - ' '1 8% 11 I S . • . . \. .... ,. , .-.,, ,.`...,, v , . ,,,,, 1 s_.,,,, &,,-, 'I -.T, N ___ . A *--cl ail,.... -.....;...,.t.,ii7-..,-r-,... .__r_...,-..,,:., 4, .4' • .....x '•• • . ,, „1-• • , i - , . • .....t )-.4. i Pit .N. • 'n •,. - -- • cir 7,FL ' --. .c1 ,. '. r , •■.• •..1‘...,. - IA" 4,. .'s . pm _ r. - , - ..: ....• .4 •••• '': '''', '7 •■ ' .:r er • ...,„, li L ' . .111011Ilt .: . ' . - . :4111p 4-. ....„ j ! ii.y.. i ....r 4 ... 14L _0 41 ,.. i ,...„ t Iv: _ , , ; v.,. ,. ..,..,. i! .1,.., , .,....,?:::,:., h,, - _. • . • 1 I . . .• ,,- IF •,.. - - . , E • !_p i-J2, .,- .4 ..32.1... •... ' ' 1 ' A • 1 i '‘'t - ' ''''•'; ..... ..4. r • il, _,;,;j1 ,,.. - 0 14 . pr --. -,. ,.. • . -1, ./J.• - 4 ., ....v.:-..,....ria• 1 -': . 711 . ..-k-.1' '''',30„......_.. • ,..ii ., ....\ ,..!, • .,....„. • , ,ii - MI 744 ''..,- iit0i, .. * ' 44 71 1 1 . 4.. 1 '., ,...., • ow. .. - + - ,"- • • : i • .... i+.; . i a 1 ... -■.- 4 . . . .,_ -,:.ffik .. ---. . m. • !I ' ..,,, t, Pp - 31y . r f ' , '•OTIF: t e : . --- ) 2- 4, 77, \.1111 • .- ,t- 1, 1 , -..ia= __._. i .4 i t , •;:. ,-. wn-..: pc.rior - ' - ' - Xi ,'. s' -.•91 ' • • , -=.... :4 s . , . m...u......• . \ I . • N - 1...... 1 r.,1 ! El• -. r t i 0,7,c7 -.. - 411111 1 AC " LA\ • ; i -•- ft:4, ., . illf MOO IS - ..,/ * ---- 1 _ . • Mal an . ., ., •-• I j zi 0 • x . i 00 . -- - - l • fifflici ' ' 1111 --" . ,- " . • -- :. 5 g . " , 7 "' .4 . • . ' ., - -.. - .. .• .:/,' ..t . • 0 OP r .. It'il . "..• 1.71 1 11110 11 61116 "- r - ! . • -0 .-r ..-I , - -...- ---:- _-_ H-......„- ..._, -- or_ ::.-- a-, -, t• _2___\ - .,,.ii............,,..... -1 -:- -1...., fmc 1, :. -. , IN !••- .•- , 4 , 04 -0..,, ;J,.. ..„ . - %-4 •-,...., H ,,,,;. - 4„aim - ..., • - . K1 1 t . r IiiiiM , & M a ' 1' ' . - .-„, .- . , & 11 , r .„,,,,,,,,.. .,,,.,.„,.,,,..„......_..„. _,,...._•. . S e 11 '•-• . I ...i.,.. , , • . 1 KIKK ..;',0",; CITY .:,•-:- % i • ...• ' .......1 " ...... ' ' ' . j 1 IV - .1. • 1, i .4 ' ,. .. •.• • -.......1 . ,,,,.. i .. . • . ... ft'5 '.'' ,r. ''..' ''' - . ,• It,' . • -.ns.:i ..i- f 39/00 'W ,, •- • ...• ; • ' . z ......."1 lo , mirt,..... f , e . 16 to •,. , It. . .••••• _..7 4. \. ;4;7' . '...,4 • • -, ..... ';'•■ .. ' • '- . 4 -...... T M 0,. gd i " ' ill se. .ii'; - • • i ii . i fi 000 If S -.A or. Ilitiie,; 34110 - ,, ; . Ai g44 ...2...; .• .:i10 I I : ' - 0 A10 10 . l , I 4 s . • ' ,. s. A 8..e.' 1 1* 4JA r • - .ii r( P • 01 i .q- -14 116 , 1FiaL r . z .1:: . 11111 10. : c4 ig % - ----1 - .: E .1. tim. ........_ ,. ....t.. f t r , , T u . . - ,, .,.. 4, "/ . . ',-- ..„ ......- -,;-- . .- ... - • .___ _ ____ dI I 2.- ... ... 70 1 . • V . LWF • . - •_e . .„--,- r-) .....,._ _ A [us or.t .:: • III a • I , , ,. ...._ -- 6r.T • AD -... .• • ..-.r . ,..,... i -',." twotocl ., . ". . 1111 , . .. '1 " . ; / 4 , . I i ; '.:3 Firl ii .i. *".". • ituttnint_.....i A, ----' ' ,., - (SI 47 . •-■ • . - - 1 \ \A lia I 1.1 . c•- - - 1 e.,;1, 4011 H. , ii -0, 1 m, . ii... ,.. 2/ . L, . ,. . , 1 el o .. • I I - k a • - +t .„,idil , .., . r ., 1 a ,... 4 .• Ila it , ..... . ‘ _ e • I . • Lilairl . 1 1-% . • •:1 . • " 1/41).... ' ! ., .., -1 r .., . .. • . . . . . al 0 i. ' 1 .... .0 .1.14. Milli - o 47 4 '. ir La • 7-I --*•. . fr .- . . - ..:--, ./ Jv ,,,., ..... • .,..,: • ........ - plif r i; C. cm, ' t, . 4- . . .-.4 4 , . a .4 P i 1 fc• . - - . , I 1.8000 • • , * . / ..f •6•141'.' h + ri& .. . iiiiii . J . ''''' __.$ - .... - ey Li '' -, Tr ••-• . ' - ; -I. .. . n it 1 . Ji , --- e• . . , F ., I ..,_.. 7 ---J c r". ....../ : � - . ,-; `: tL : - •,..- • • iiillia - I I ..),...,„. .........„_>, . •„,...., .....• 1 - 7; CM!. t . :--- : O °;,!..: • . - '':. 'PN4t qi ... .... • _ - --- -- - - - __ • _ _ _. ! l ../ • • I I - - ' - i ' tr.Jr. ./ • - 1 E . - ---- - - --- • • . . -P ... ... _ . .. . . _ - .., iy„i„,e - - - _.i_ - .- - - - - • J II INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT McDONALD STREET /GAARDE STREET AT HIGHWAY 99W • T= 3.2% P =.853 N +' 1239 DATE OF COUNT: 05/26/94 II O ♦ 308 DAY OF WEEK: Thu R 1 171 67 TIME STARTED: 07:00 T TIME ENDED: 09:00 H 4-736 4-I 1 L► 4-788 187 -I X45 T= 5.6% T =11.1% 1449 -. .-655 P =.911 P =.916 154 ,-8 8 TEV =TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME ♦ i T= %TRUCKS BY APPROACH 4 1 r P =PHF BY APPROACH 1790 -► 1578 -► 80 76 62 Peak Hour 1413 ♦ 0720 -08:20 Traffic Smithy + T= 6.6% P =.813 1218 TEV =3035 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND II TIME PERIOD --► • 4 • • ALL I 07:00 -07:05 7 91 4 0 14 3 4 4 4 4 37 2 174 07:05 -07:10 7 95 11 1 10 4 5 1 8 3 44 1 190 07:10 -07:15 14 128 9 0 10 7 6 4 6 0 69 0 253 07:15 -07:20 16 102 10 0 17 4 5 2 2 4 56 1 219 07:20 -07:25 7 101 18 0 14 5 6 5 7 5 58 4 230 II 07:25 -07:30 17 126 17 0 17 5 7 7 0 8 51 5 260 07:30 -07:35 17 122 15 0 15 4 3 8 4 2 45 5 240 07:35 -07:40 18 93 15 0 12 9 10 6 1 10 54 4 232 07:40 -07:45 17 140 10 0 9 6 8 7 5 4 77 4 287 07:45 -07:50 15 124 18 0 29 4 7 4 7 11 47 4 270 II 07:50 -07:55 13 114 13 0 10 11 10 4 7 11 49 2 244 07:55 -08:00 10 146 19 0 12 4 8 16 4 7 61 5 292 08:00 -08:05 9 151 16 0 13 0 5 5 4 8 46 3 260 08:05 -08:10 2 101 14 1 15 9 10 4 10 2 50 1 219 1 08:10 -08:15 08:15 -08:20 11 127 19 0 11 4 4 7 7 11 60 3 264 18 104 13 0 14 6 2 3 6 9 57 5 237 08:20 -08:25 10 89 18 0 10 7 10 7 6 6 53 9 225 08.:25-08:30 . _9.. 12.1 .14 0 13 ,10 8 7 8 .9 .56 6 261 1 08:30 -08:35 9 115 13 0 13 10 2 5 7 5 60 5 244 08:35 -08:40 6 73 19 0 4 1 8 6 0 1 63 3 198 08:40 -08:45 8 135 15 1 12 1 3 2 1 8 68 7 272 08:45 -08:50 9 83 13 0 5 4 4 8 8 11 68 3 216 08:50 -08:55 6 106 11 0 1 1 8 6 6 6 68 2 221 1 08:55 -09:00 14 78 17 0 5 1 3 5 3 11 64 4 205 1 1 I Total Survey 269 2665 341 3 285 120 146 133 132 170 1361 88 5713 PHF .74 .88 .94 .25 .84 .8 .8 .76 .67 .76 .92 .8 .941 Trucks 2.6 5.9 5.9 33.3 2.8 3.3 9.6 3.8 6.1 4.1 12 9.1 7.1 Stopped Buses 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II Peds 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 3 0 Hourly Totals 07:00 -08:00 158 1382 159 1 169 66 79 68 55 69 648 37 2891 II 07:15 -08:15 152 1447 184 1 174 65 83 75 58 83 654 41 3017 07:30 -08:30 149 1432 184 1 163 74 85 78 69 90 655 51 3031 07:45 -08:45 120 1400 191 2 156 67 77 70 78 102 670 53 2986 08:00 -09:00 111 1283 182 2 116 54 67 65 77 101 713 51 2822 1 1 INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT McDONALD STREET /GAARDE STREET AT HIGHWAYE9999WT • T= 2.5% P =.931 N 1216 13 127 76 • DATE OF COUNT: 05/26/94 1 0 535 DAY OF WEEK: Thu R TIME STARTED: 16:00 T TIME ENDED: 18:00 H 4 -1674 4-t 4 4 -1758 • II 216 X114 T= 4.7% T= 3.2% 1184 -. 4 -1504 P =.930 P =.939 II 129 140 TEV =TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME ♦ * T= %TRUCKS BY APPROACH 4-1 I r• P =PHF BY APPROACH 1529 -► 139 157 205 139 Peak Hour 1396 ♦ 17:00 -18:00 Traffic Smithy T= 2.7% P =.888 501 T'EV =4004 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND II TIME PERIOD FROM - TO z 1 i r r • ALL II 16:00-16:05 11 106 18 1 9 5 12 8 5 9 115 5 304 16:05 -16:10 12 106 18 0 5 7 9 9 9 7 123 9 314 16:10 16:15 7 98 20 0 4 6 19 11 7 12 160 8 352 16:15 -16:20 17 145 21 0 4 6 12 10 3 9 130 5 362 16:20 -16:25 7 108 13 0. 5 6 11 13 7 9 136 9 324 II 16:25 -16:30 7 102 15 1 4 2 8 5 7 9 106 6 272 16:30 -16:35 13 99 12 0 8 1 16 16 12 8 96 7 288 16:35 -16:40 6 88 22 0 10 10 18 18 6 5 102 5 290 16:40 -16:45 13 106 27 0 8 3 9 11 8 10 112 4 311 II 16:45 -16:50 12 102 14 0 6 9 16 13 8 10 131 7 328 16:50 -16:55 8 112 21 1 9 4 9 10 10 10 124 10 328 16:55 -17:00 7 113 19 0 9 5 8 8 13 6 142 11 341 17:00 -17:05 14 107 11 3 11 8 8 11 15 10 108 5 311 17:05 -17:10 10 80 23 1 10 5 18 20 8 13 120 11 319 II 17:10 -17:15 14 113 14 1 7 7 20 19 10 9 115 7 336 17:15 -17:20 6 92 22 2 11 9 12 16 13 15 128 7 333 17:20 -17:25 19 96 22 1 3 5 15 18 13 7 127 10 336 .17:25-17:30 8 . 125 - 21 - 1 _ 15 _11 . . 8 .. .18 _ 12 _ 10.. 140 12 . 381 II 17:30 -17:35 15 84 16 0 9 5 10 11 12 14 127 10 313 17:35 -17:40 15 89 12 2 9 4 11 18 13 8 137 10 328 17:40 -17:45 7 85 21 1 19 5 13 23 14 9 125 10 332 17:45 -17:50 5 99 20 1 6 4 15 21 13 16 123 10 333 17:50 -17:55 6 102 21 0 13 6 14 14 6 14 118 11 325 11 17:55 -18:00 10 112 13 0 14 7 13 16 10 15 136 11 357 II il II Total Survey 249 2469 436 16 208 140 304 337 234 244 2981 200 7818 PHF .77 .95 .83 .65 .84 .76 .79 .83 .87 .78 .93 .89 .953 % Trucks 5.6 5.1 1.8 18.8 2.4 .7 .7 3.6 4.3 2 3.4 .5 3.7 Stopped Buses 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 il Peds 0 9 0 0 13 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 Hourly Totals 16:00 -17:00 120 1285 220 3 81 64 147 132 95 104 1477 86 3814 II 16:15 -17:15 128 1275 212 7 91 66 153 154 107 108 1422 87 3810 16:30 -17:30 130 1233 228 10 107 77 157 178 128 113 1445 96 3902 16:45 -17:45 135 1198 216 13 118 77 148 185 141 121 1524 110 3986 17:00 -18:00 129 1184 216 13 127 76 157 205 139 140 1504 114 4004 II II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1r II i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix D 1 1994 Existing LOS Worksheets N (AM and PM) 1 1 11111 1 1 r r 1- 1 1 11 1 1 1 w 1 1 1 1327EXAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:59:31 Page 1 -1 1327EXAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:59:32 Page 2 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 • Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1994 Existing A.M. Traffic Volumes 1994 Existing A.M. Traffic Volumes Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street # 1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald C 17.1 0.815 C 17.1 0.815 + 0.000 D/V Base 185 1450 155 90 655 45 65 170 2 80 75 60 3032 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # 2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Total 185 1450 155 90 655 45 65 170 2 80 75 60 3032 # 3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaar A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Base 2 1575 0 0 790 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2373 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 1575 0 0 790 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2373 Arterial Base Future Change Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 235 0 0 305 2 548 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 235 0 0 305 2 548 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1 1 1 1 s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 r r 1 1 1327EXAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:59:32 Page 3 -1 1327EXAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:59:32 Page 4 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1994 Existing A.M. Traffic Volumes 1994 Existing A.M. Traffic Volumes Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde- McDonald Street Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.815 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec /veh): 17.1 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 78 Level Of Service: C 1 11 11 11 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L RT RT 1 11 11 11 1 #LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected 1 11 11 11 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 t Hev Veh: 6 11 3 7 1 11 11 11 1 Grade: 0t of 0t Ot Volume Module: Parking /Hr: No No No No Base Vol: 185 1450 155 90 655 45 65 170 2 80 75 60 Bus Stp /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Initial Bse: 185 1450 155 90 655 45 65 170 2 80 75 60 Cnft Ped /Hr: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 t RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 197 1541 165 96 696 48 69 181 2 85 80 64 1 11 11 11 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: Reduced Vol: 197 1541 165 96 696 48 69 181 2 85 80 64 f(rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 1 Final Vol.: 197 1541 165 96 696 48 69 181 2 85 80 64 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: 1 11 11 11 1 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Hev Veh Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 Sat /Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.44 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1659 3123 334 1618 3406 1447 1684 1773 1507 1650 897 718 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 1 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.93 0.93 Capacity Analysis Module: LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.49 0.49 0.06 0.20 0.03 0.04 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.09 HCM Sat Adj: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 Crit Moves: : *:: * * ** : : :* : : *: Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Green /Cycle: 0.25 0.61 0.61 0.07 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.13 0.13 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume /Cap: 0.48 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.48 0.08 0.69 0.82 0.01 0.82 0.69 0.69 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 1 11 11 11 I 1 11 11 11 1 Level Of Service Module: Progresssion Adjustment Factor Module: Delay /Veh: 22.6 12.4 12.4 53.8 14.2 11.5 43.5 42.9 26.2 56.3 34.8 34.8 Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume /Cap: 0.48 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.48 0.08 0.69 0.82 0.01 0.82 0.69 0.69 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 AdjDel /Veh: 22.6 10.5 10.5 53.8 12.1 9.8 43.5 36.5 22.3 56.3 29.5 29.5 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Queue: 4 35 35 3 13 1 2 6 0 3 4 4 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1 r r 1 1- 1 11111 M i r - - 1-- 1 1327EXAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:59:32 Page 5 -1 1327EXAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:59:32 Page 6 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1994 Existing A.M. Traffic Volumes 1994 Existing A.M. Traffic Volumes Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Base Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Intersection #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Level Of Service: D Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I 1 II II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 i II II II 1 1 11 11 11 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1575 0 0 790 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 235 0 0 305 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 1575 0 0 790 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Bee: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 235 0 0 305 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 2 1750 0 0 878 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 261 0 0 339 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 2 1750 0 0 878 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 261 0 0 339 2 II II II 1 I 11 II II Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: Ot 0% 0% Ot Grade: 0% 0% 0% Ot t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 2 1750 0 0 878 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 261 0 0 339 2 II I) II 1 I II II ii Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(N /S): 30 MPH « Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 <c » Run Speed(E /W): 30 MPH « RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx i II II 1 I 1 11 11 11 i Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 880 xxxx xxxxx 1750 xxxx xxxxx 2631 2631 440 2634 2632 875 Cnflict Vol: 607 604 131 603 603 171 341 xxxx xxxxx 261 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 458 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 588 65 82 385 Potent Cap.: 366 422 963 473 423 824 853 xxxx xxxxx 828 xxxx xxxxx t Used Cap.: 0.5 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 2.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 t Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Actual Cap.: 458 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 588 65 82 385 Actual Cap.: 366 422 963 473 423 824 853 xxxx xxxxx 828 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 1 II II 11 Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 456 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 103 82 586 65 82 385 Unused Cap.: 366 422 963 471 423 821 851 xxxx xxxxx 828 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A • • • • • • • • • • • LOS by Move: • • • • • • A • • • • • Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 178 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 601 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 173 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 596 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: • • • • • • • D • • • • Shared LOS: • • • • A • • • • • • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 II -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/26/1994 10:48: 6 II INTERSECTION: Tigard, OR - Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald St. VOLUMES: 1994 Existing AM Peak METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: DMB FILE NAME: EXAM.SIG II !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 90 G= 74 Y= 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I **** ! ! ! ! ! ! ******************** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D -E * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 85% * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * i i i i i i . ************************ I ! SOUTH APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! 1 ! RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 ! II 4 ! ... .0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 ... .0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! II APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R L T R! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 185 1450 155 1790 ! 85% 85% 85% ! D -E D -E D -E ! II NORTH ! 90 655 45 790 ! 70% 48% 22% ! C A A ! WEST ! 65 170 2 237 ! 56% 85% 18% ! B D -E A ! EAST ! 80 75 60 215 ! 64% 71% 71% ! C C C ! II APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! ! II N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- ! ! ! 11 ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST II TR ! .446 .000 .000 .075 R ! .086 .025 .001 .033 R -ADJ! .000 .023 .001 .000 T ! .403 .182 .094 .042 L ! .106 .052 .037 .046 ! N -S V/C =.512 E -W V/C =.161 TOTAL AMBER =.178 MINIMUM V/C =.067 1 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 2109 ! SOUTH ! 11.7 49.0 49.0 ! 201 457 0 NORTH ! 1974 ! NORTH ! 7.3 44.6 51.9 ! 103 206 24 ! WEST ! 453 ! WEST ! 7.3 10.4 22.1 ! 75 188 2 11 EAST ! 526 ! EAST ! 7.3 10.4 10.4 . 92 149 0 . II r i r 1 - 1 1 11111 x 1 s1 MB 1 r 1 1 1 1 1327EXPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:00:48 Page 1 -1 1327EXPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:00:48 Page 2 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1994 Existing P.M. Traffic Volumes 1994 Existing P.M. Traffic Volumes Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street # 1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald D 32.1 0.924 D 32.1 0.924 + 0.000 D/V Base 215 1185 130 140 1505 115 75 125 15 155 205 140 4005 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # 2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Total 215 1185 130 140 1505 115 75 125 15 155 205 140 4005 # 3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaar B xxxxx 0.000 B xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Base 2 1400 0 0 1760 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 3168 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 1400 0 0 1760 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 3168 Arterial Base Future Change Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 215 0 0 535 2 758 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 215 0 0 535 2 758 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1327EXPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:00:48 Page 3 -1 1327EXPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:00:48 Page 4 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1994 Existing P.M. Traffic Volumes 1994 Existing P.M. Traffic Volumes Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method 1985 HCM Operations Method Base Volume Alternative Base Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Cycle (sec): 140 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.924 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lose Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec /veh): 32.1 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 147 Level Of Service: D 1 11 11 11 1 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L RT RT 1 11 11 11 1 #LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected 1 11 11 11 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include • HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 % Hev Veh: 5 3 3 3 1 11 11 11 1 Grade: Ot 0% 0% 0% Volume Module: Parking /Hr: No No No No Base Vol: 215 1185 130 140 1505 115 75 125 15 155 205 140 Bus Stp /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Area Type: < < < < c < < < c < < < < c c Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Initial Bse: 215 1185 130 140 1505 115 75 125 15 155 205 140 Cnft Ped /Hr: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 t RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 226 1243 136 147 1579 121 79 131 16 163 215 147 1 11 11 11 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: Reduced Vol: 226 1243 136 147 1579 121 79 131 16 163 215 147 f(rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 1 Final Vol.: 226 1243 136 147 1579 121 79 131 16 163 215 147 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: 1 11 11 11 , 1 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Hev Veh Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Sat /Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.41 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1667 3132 343 1684 3546 1507 1684 1773 1507 1684 990 677 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 1 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.94 0.94 Capacity Analysis Module: LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx Vol /Sat: 0.14 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.45 0.08 0.05 0.07 0.01 0.10 0.22 0.22 HCM Sat Adj: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Crit Moves: • * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Green /Cycle: 0.15 0.52 0.52 0.11 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.24 0.24 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume /Cap: 0.92 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.92 0.17 0.92 0.60 0.09 0.60 0.92 0.92 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 Level Of Service Module: Progresssion Adjustment Factor Module: Delay /Veh: 71.6 22.2 22.2 57.4 32.3 15.5 102 47.2 41.3 43.9 59.4 59.4 Signal Type: < < < < < < c < < < < < c Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Volume /Cap: 0.92 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.92 0.17 0.92 0.60 0.09 0.60 0.92 0.92 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 ArrivalType: 3 3 a3 3 AdjDel /Veh: 71.6 18.9 18.9 57.4 27.4 13.2 102 40.2 35.1 43.9 50.5 50.5 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 Queue: 11 44 44 6 61 3 5 5 1 6 17 17 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1 r11111 1 ■r 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 r s 1327EXPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:00:48 Page 5 -1, 1327EXPM.CMD Thu Sep.l, 1994 10:00:48 Page 6 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 • Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1994 Existing P.M. Traffic Volumes 1994 Existing P.M. Traffic Volumes Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Base Volume Alternative Base Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Intersection #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Level Of Service: D ' Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 11 11 11 ' 1 I 11 11 11 1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 11 11 11 . I 1 11 11 11 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1400 0 0 1760 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 215 0 0 535 2 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 1400 0 0 1760 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 215 0 0 535 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 2 1556 0 0 1956 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 239 0 0 594 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 2 1556 0 0 1956 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 239 0 0 594 2 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: Ot Ot Ot Ot Grade: Ot Ot Ot Ot t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 2 1556 0 0 1956 2 2 0 2 0 0 ,0 Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 239 0 0 594 2 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 I Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(N /S): 30 MPH « Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(E /W): 30 MPH « RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 Critical Gp: 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: • Cnflict Vol: 1958 xxxx xxxxx 1556 xxxx xxxxx 3514 3514 979 3518 3516 778 Cnflict Vol: 840 838 239 837 837 596 597 xxxx xxxxx 239 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 159 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 278 65 82 439 Potent Cap.: 290 346 851 347 347 478 632 xxxx xxxxx 949 xxxx xxxxx t Used Cap.: 1.5 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 2.3 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 t Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: 0.99 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Actual Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 159 xxxx xxxxx 104 81 278 64 81 439 Actual Cap.: 290 346 851 347 347 478 632 xxxx xxxxx 949 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 1 II II 11 I Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 163 xxxx xxxxx 159 xxxx xxxxx 102 81 276 64 81 439 Unused Cap.: 290 346 851 344 347 476 630 xxxx xxxxx 949 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: D • * * • * • • • • * ? LOS by Move: • • * • • • A • • • • • Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 152 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 402 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 147 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 397 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: • • * • • * • D • * * * Shared LOS: • • • • B * • • * * • * Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 II -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/30/1994 13:43:30 J INTERSECTION: Tigard, Or. Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald St. VOLUMES: 1994 Existing PM Peak METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: MHN FILE NAME: II !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 140 G =124 Y= 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL E * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 89% * I ! ! ! ! . ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I ! SOUTH APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! II 1 ! RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ! 3 ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 ! 11 4 ! ... .0 L.. 12.0 .0 ... .0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! II APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R ! L T R! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 215 1185 130 1530 ! 89% 79% 79% ! E D D ! NORTH ! 140 1505 115 1760 ! 62% 89% 23% ! C E A ! II WEST ! 75 125 15 215 ! 89% 48% 15% ! E A A ! EAST ! 155 205 140 500 ! 89% 89% 89% ! E E E ! I APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! ! I N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! /S -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- ! !N ! ! I ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! TR ! .365 .000 .000 .192 R ! .072 .064 .008 .078 R -ADJ! .000 .061 .007 .000 T ! .329 .418 .069 .114 II L ! .124 .080 .043 .089 . N -S V/C =.542 E -W V/C =.235 TOTAL AMBER =.114 MINIMUM V/C =.043 II ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! II ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 2583 ! SOUTH ! 19.7 66.8 66.8 ! 359 669 0 ! NORTH ! 2547 ! NORTH ! 19.7 66.8 73.7 ! 234 765 106 ! WEST ! 604 ! WEST ! 6.9 23.3 43.0 ! 139 203 20 ! II EAST ! 722 ! EAST ! 14.2 30.6 30.6 ! 271 524 0 ! II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Appendix E D 1 . PP . , 1 1995 Background LOS N Worksheets (AM and PM) 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 x 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1327BKAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:56:32 Page 1 -1 1327BKAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:56:32 Page 2 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Background A.M. Traffic Volumes 1995 Background A.M. Traffic Volumes Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street # 1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald C 17.9 0.840 C 17.9 0.840 + 0.000 D/V Base 191 1494 160 93 675 46 67 175 2 82 77 62 3123 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # 2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Total 191 1494 160 93 675 46 67 175 2 82 77 62 3123 # 3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaar A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Base 2 1622 0 0 814 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2444 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 1622 0 0 814 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2444 Arterial Base Future Change Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 242 0 0 314 2 564 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 242 0 0 314 2 564 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1327BKAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:56:32 Page 3 -1 1327BKAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:56:32 Page 4 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Background A.M. Traffic Volumes 1995 Background A.M. Traffic Volumes Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method 1985 HCM Operations Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.840 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec /veh): 17.9 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 84 Level Of Service: C 1 11 II 11 1 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L RT RT 11 11 11 1 #LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected 1 11 11 11 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 % Hev Veh: 6 11 3 7 1 11 11 11 1 Grade: 0% of 0% 0% Volume Module: Parking /Hr: No No No No Base Vol: 185 1450 155 90 655 45 65 170 2 80 75 60 Bus Stp /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Area Type: < c < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Initial Bse: 191 1494 160 93 675 46 67 175 2 82 77 62 Cnft Ped /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Initial Fut: 191 1494 160 93 675 46 67 175 2 82 77 62 t RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 1 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: PHF Volume: 202 1587 170 99 717 49 71 186 2 88 82 66 f(rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Reduced Vol: 202 1587 170 99 717 49 71 186 2 88 82 66 1 11 11 11 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 202 1587 170 99 717 49 71 186 2 88 82 66 Hev Veh Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 1 11 11 11 1 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Sat /Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 0.45 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.93 0.93 Final Sat.: 1659 3123 334 1618 3406 1447 1684 1773 1507 1650 895 720 LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 HCM Sat Adj: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 Capacity Analysis Module: Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.51 0.51 0.06 0.21 0.03 0.04 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.09 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Fnl Sat Adj: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 Green /Cycle: 0.25 0.61 0.61 0.07 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.13 0.13 1 11 11 11 1 Volume /Cap: 0.49 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.49 0.08 0.71 0.84 0.01 0.84 0.71 0.71 Progresssion Adjustment Factor Module: 1 11 11 11 1 Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < c < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Level Of Service Module: Volume /Cap: 0.49 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.49 0.08 0.71 0.84 0.01 0.84 0.71 0.71 Delay /Veh: 22.8 13.1 13.1 57.3 14.3 11.5 45.1 45.5 26.2 60.0 35.7 35.7 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 AdjDel /Veh: 22.8 11.2 11.2 57.3 12.2 9.8 45.1 38.7 22.3 60.0 30.4 30.4 Queue: 4 37 37 4 13 1 2 6 0 3 4 4 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1327BKAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:56:32 Page 5 -1 1327BKAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:56:32 Page 6 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Background A.M. Traffic Volumes 1995 Background A.M. Traffic Volumes Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Intersection #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Level Of Service: D Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 II II 11 I I ii 11 11 I Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1575 0 0 790 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 235 0 0 305 2 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 2 1622 0 0 814 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 242 0 0 314 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 2 1622 0 0 814 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 242 0 0 314 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 2 1803 0 0 904 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 269 0 0 349 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 2 1803 0 0 904 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 269 0 0 349 2 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% 0% 01 0% Grade: 01 0% 01 04 t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 4 Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx i Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 3 1803 0 0 904 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 269 0 0 349 2 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(N /S): 30 MPH « Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(E /W): 30 MPH c< RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 906 xxxx xxxxx 1803 xxxx xxxxx 2710 2710 453 2713 2711 901 Cnflict Vol: 625 623 134 621 621 176 351 xxxx xxxxx 269 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 446 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 578 65 82 370 Potent Cap.: 355 409 959 462 410 819 844 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx % Used Cap.: 0.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 2.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 % Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Actual Cap.: 446 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 578 65 82 370 Actual Cap.: 355 409 959 462 410 819 844 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 444 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 102 82 576 65 82 370 Unused Cap.: 355 409 959 460 410 817 841 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A • • • • • • * * • * * LOS by Move: • • * * • • A * • * • • Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 178 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 591 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 173 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 586 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * • * * D • * • * Shared LOS: * • • • A • • • • • • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 1 II -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/30/1994 11:50: 0 INTERSECTION: TIGARD, OR. HIGHWAY 99W /SW GAARDE - McDONALD ST. VOLUMES: 1995 BACKGROUND AM PEAK II METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: MHN FILE NAME: II !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 90 G= 74 Y= 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * I ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D -E * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 87% * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! II LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! 1 ! RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! I 2 ! 3 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ! ! L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 .0 ! 4 ! ... .0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 ... .0 ! II ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R! L T R! II SOUTH ! 190 1495 160 1845 ! 87% 87% 87% ! D -E D -E D -E ! NORTH ! 95 675 45 815 ! 74% 49% 22% ! C -D A A ! WEST ! 65 175 2 242 ! 56% 87% 18% ! B D -E A ! II EAST ! 80 75 60 215 ! 65% 71% 71% . C C C ! APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! __ ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! ! !N /S -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! II E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- . ! ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES ' MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! TR ! .460 .000 .000 .075 R ! .089 .025 .001 .033 I R -ADJ! .000 .023 .001 .000 T ! .415 .188 .097 .042 L ! .109 .055 .037 .046 ! II N -S V/C =.526 E -W V/C =.164 TOTAL AMBER =.178 MINIMUM V/C =.067 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE II LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 2120 ! SOUTH ! 11.7 49.3 49.3 ! 207 468 0 II NORTH ! 1984 ! NORTH ! 7.1 44.7 51.9 ! 109 212 24 WEST ! 451 ! WEST ! 7.1 10.4 22.1 ! 75 193 2 EAST ! 525 ! EAST ! 7.1 10.4 10.4 ! 92 149 0 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1327BKPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:57:44 Page 1 -1 1327BKPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:57:44 Page 2 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Background P.M. Traffic Volumes 1995 Background P.M. Traffic Volumes Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street # 1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald D 34.2 0.951 D 34.2 0.951 + 0.000 D/V Base 221 1221 134 144 1550 118 77 129 15 160 211 144 4125 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # 2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W D xxxxx 0.000 D xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Total 221 1221 134 144 1550 118 77 129 15 160 211 144 4125 # 3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaar B xxxxx 0.000 B xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Base 2 1442 0 0 1813 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 3263 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 1442 0 0 1813 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 3263 Arterial Base Future Change Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 221 0 0 551 2 781 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 221 0 0 551 2 781 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 all • • • • • • • • MI 1.11 IIIIII 1111 II MN MO MI in 101. MO 1327BKPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:57:44 Page 3 -1 1327BKPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:57:44 Page 4 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Background P.M. Traffic Volumes 1995 Background P.M. Traffic Volumes Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method 1985 HCM Operations Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Cycle (sec): 140 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.951 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec /veh): 34.2 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 175 Level Of Service: D 1 II 11 11 1 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L RT RT 1 II 11 11 1 #LnsinGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected 1 11 11 11 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 t Hev Veh: 5 3 3 3 1 11 11 11 1 Grade: of of Ot of Volume Module: Parking /Hr: No No No No Base Vol: 215 1185 130 140 1505 115 75 125 15 155 205 140 Bus Stp /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < c Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Initial Bse: 221 1221 134 144 1550 118 77 129 15 160 211 144 Cnft Ped /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include include Include Initial Fut: 221 1221 134 144 1550 118 77 129 15 160 211 144 t RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 1 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: PHF Volume: 232 1281 141 151 1627 124 81 135 16 168 222 151 f(rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 Reduct Vol:" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Reduced Vol: 232 1281 141 151 1627 124 81 135 16 168 222 151 1 11 II 11 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 232 1281 141 151 1627 124 81 135 16 168 222 151 Hev Veh Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 1 11 11 11 1 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Sat /Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.40 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.94 0.94 Final Sat.: 1667 3130 345 1684 3546 1507 1684 1773 1507 1684 992 675 LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 11 11 11 I HCM Sat Adj: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Capacity Analysis Module: Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vol /Sat: 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.09 0.46 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.01 0.10 0.22 0.22 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit Moves: * *** * * ** * * ** * * ** Fnl Sat Adj: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Green /Cycle: 0.15 0.52 0.52 0.11 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.24 0.24 1 11 11 11 1 Volume /Cap: 0.95 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.17 0.95 0.62 0.09 0.62 0.95 0.95 Progresssion Adjustment Factor Module: 1 11 11 11 1 Signal Type: <<<<<<<<<<<<< Actuated > > > >> >> >>> >>> Level Of Service Module: Volume /Cap: 0.95 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.17 0.95 0.62 0.09 0.62 0.95 0.95 Delay /Veh: 77.3 22.9 22.9 59.5 35.4 15.6 109 47.8 41.3 44.4 64.3 64.3 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 AdjDel /Veh: 77.3 19.5 19.5 59.5 30.1 13.2 109 40.6 35.1 44.4 54.6 54.6 Queue: 12 47 47 7 66 3 5 5 1 6 18 18 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1327BKPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:57:44 Page 5 -1 1327BKPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:57:44 Page 6 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Background P.M. Traffic Volumes 1995 Background P.M. Traffic Volumes Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Intersection #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Level Of Service: D Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I 11 11 II I I II II II 1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I 11 11 11 1 1 II II 11 I Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1400 0 0 1760 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 215 0 0 535 2 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 2 1442 0 0 1813 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 221 0 0 551 2 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 2 1442 0 0 1813 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 221 0 0 551 2 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 2 1602 0 0 2014 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 246 0 0 612 2 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 2 1602 0 0 2014 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 246 0 0 612 2 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Grade: Ot 0% 0% Ot V Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 3 1602 0 0 2014 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 246 0 0 612 2 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(N /S): 30 MPH « Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 <c » Run Speed(E /W): 30 MPH « RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 Critical Gp: 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx I II II 11 I I II 11 II I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 2017 xxxx xxxxx 1602 xxxx xxxxx 3620 3620 1008 3623 3621 801 Cnflict Vol: 865 863 246 862 862 613 615 xxxx xxxxx 246 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 150 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 268 65 82 429 Potent Cap.: 280 335 844 335 335 467 620 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx t Used Cap.: 1.5 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 2.4 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 t Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.5 0.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: 0.99 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Actual Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 150 xxxx xxxxx 104 81 268 64 81 429 Actual Cap.: 280 335 844 335 335 467 620 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx I 11 II 11 I 1 11 II 11 1 Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 162 xxxx xxxxx 150 xxxx xxxxx 102 81 265 64 81 429 Unused Cap.: 280 335 844 333 335 464 617 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: D • • • • * * • • • • * LOS by Move: • • • * * • A • * * * • Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 150 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 390 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 145 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 385 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: • • * • • • * D • * • * Shared LOS: * * • • B • • • • * * • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 1 -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/26/1994 10:52: 5 I INTERSECTION: Tigard, OR - Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald St. VOLUMES: 1995 Background PM Peak METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: DMB I FILE NAME: BKPM.SIG !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 140 G =124 Y= 16 I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL E * I ! * SATURATION * 91% ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * ! ! ! ! ! ! . * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1 1 APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH I 1 ! RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 I 3 ! L.. 12.0 T. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 4 ! .0 L. 12.0 .0 .0 I ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R! L T R! ! ! SOUTH ! 220 1220 135 1575 ! 91% 81% 81% ! E D D II NORTH ! 145 1550 120 1815 ! 64% 91% 23% ! C E A WEST ! 75 130 15 220 ! 91% 50% 15% ! E A A EAST ! 160 210 145 515 ! 91% 91% 91% ! E E E 1 APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! II N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- ! ! Il ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST 1 ! TR ! .376 .000 .000 .197 R ! .075 .067 .008 .081 R -ADJ! .000 .063 .007 .000 II T ! .339 .431 .072 .117 ! L ! 126 .083 .043 .092 I N -S V/C =.557 E -W V/C =.240 TOTAL AMBER =.114 MINIMUM V/C =.043 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! I ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 2590 ! SOUTH ! 19.7 67.0 67.0 ! 368 687 0 ! NORTH ! 2554 ! NORTH ! 19.7 67.0 73.7 ! 242 786 111 ! I WEST ! 605 ! ! WEST ! 6.7 23.1 42.7 ! 139 211 20 ! EAST ! 727 EAST ! 14.3 30.7 30.7 ! 279 539 0 ! II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 D Appendix F 1 1995 Total Traffic LOS ' Worksheets (AM and PM) 1 r r r r r r a- - - r 11111 r- - - r 11111 r 1327WSAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:02:03 Page 1 -1 1327WSAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:02:03 Page 2 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway Trip Generation Report Trip Distribution Report Forecast for Percent Of Trips Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total t Of To Gates # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 30.0 25.0 30.0 15.0 0.0 1 SITE 110.00 NET NEW TRIPS 0.51 0.49 56 54 110 75.9 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Zone 1 Subtotal 56 54 110 75.9 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 N -S Pass -Bys 35.00 N -S Pass -Bys 0.00 0.31 0 11 11 7.6 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Zone 2 Subtotal 0 11 11 7.6 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 4 S -N Pass -Bys 35.00 S -N Pass -Bye 0.00 0.69 0 24 24 16.6 Zone 4 Subtotal 0 24 24 16.6 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 TOTAL 56 89 145 100.0 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1 1 rt- a me me ,— 1 1 AM r s 1 1 1 1- s MI 1327WSAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:02:03 Page 3 -1 1327WSAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:02:03 Page 4 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street # 1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald C 17.9 0.840 C 18.8 0.854 + 0.945 D/V Base 191 1494 160 93 675 46 67 175 2 82 77 62 3123 Added 3 13 0 11 13 0 0 3 3 0 3 11 61 # 2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W D xxxxx 0.000 E xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Total 194 1507 160 104 688 46 67 178 5 82 80 73 3183 # 3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaar A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Base 2 1622 0 0 814 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2444 Added 48 -24 0 0 -11 28 40 0 35 0 0 0 116 Total 50 1598 0 0 803 30 42 0 37 0 0 0 2560 Arterial Base Future Change Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 242 0 0 314 2 564 Added 0 0 0 6 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 6 29 Total 0 0 0 8 0 10 10 242 0 0 314 8 593 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 -- 11- 11111 -11 -- r 11- - a- _ 41- -- -- -- -1 -- 111- 11111 -- 1327WSAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:02:03 Page 5 -1 1327WSAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:02:03 Page 6 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method 1985 HCM Operations Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.854 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec /veh): 18.8 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 88 Level Of Service: C 1 11 11 11 1 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L RT RT 11 11 11 1 #LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected 1 11 11 11 1 Rights: Include Include Include Include HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 % Hev Veh: 6 11 3 7 1 11 11 11 1 Grade: 0% Ot 0% 0% Volume Module: Parking /Hr: No No No No Base Vol: 185 1450 155 90 655 45 65 170 2 80 75 60 Bus Stp /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Area Type: c < < c < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Initial Bse: 191 1494 160 93 675 46 67 175 2 82 77 62 Cnft Ped /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 3 13 0 11 13 0 0 3 3 0 3 11 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Initial Fut: 194 1507 160 104 688 46 67 178 5 82 80 73 t RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 11 11 1 PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: PHF Volume: 206 1601 170 110 731 49 71 189 6 88 85 78 f(rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Reduced Vol: 206 1601 170 110 731 49 71 189 6 88 85 78 1 11 11 11 1 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 206 1601 170 110 731 49 71 189 6 88 85 78 Hev Veh Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 1 11 11 11 1 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Sat /Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.52 0.48 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.93 0.93 Final Sat.: 1659 3125 332 1618 3406 1447 1684 1773 1507 1650 842 773 LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 HCM Sat Adj: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 Capacity Analysis Module: Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.51 0.51 0.07 0.21 0.03 0.04 0.11 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.10 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit Moves: •••• •••• •••• •••• Fnl Sat Adj: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.90 0.90 Green /Cycle: 0.25 0.60 0.60 0.08 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.13 0.13 1 11 11 11 1 Volume /Cap: 0.50 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.50 0.08 0.76 0.85 0.03 0.85 0.76 0.76 Progresssion Adjustment Factor Module: i 11 11 11 1 Signal Type: < < < < < < < < c < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Level Of Service Module: Volume /Cap: 0.50 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.50 0.08 0.76 0.85 0.03 0.85 0.76 0.76 Delay /Veh: 22.8 13.9 13.9 57.7 14.4 11.5 51.7 47.3 26.3 62.9 38.8 38.8 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 AdjDel /Veh: 22.8 11.8 11.8 57.7 12.2 9.8 51.7 40.2 22.4 62.9 33.0 33.0 Queue: 5 38 38 4 13 1 2 6 0 3 5 5 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 1 1 4 1 1 1 11111 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1327WSAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:02:04 Page 7 -1 1327WSAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:02:04 Page 8 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Intersection #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Level Of Service: E Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 11 II II 1 I 11 11 11 1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1575 0 0 790 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 235 0 0 305 2 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 2 1622 0 0 814 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 242 0 0 314 2 Added Vol: 48 -24 0 0 -11 28 40 0 35 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 6 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 6 Initial Fut: 50 1598 0 0 803 30 42 0 37 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 8 0 10 10 242 0 0 314 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 56 1776 0 0 892 33 47 0 41 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 9 0 11 12 269 0 0 349 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 56 1776 0 0 892 33 47 0 41 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 9 0 11 12 269 0 0 349 9 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Grade: 0%r 0% Ot 0% % Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Tr Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 62 1776 0 0 892 33 51 0 45 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 10 0 12 13 269 0 0 349 9 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(N /S): 30 MPH « Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(E /W): 30 MPH « RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 925 xxxx xxxxx 1776 xxxx xxxxx 2741 2741 463 2798 2757 888 Cnflict Vol: 650 639 134 634 634 179 358 xxxx xxxxx 269 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 435 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 572 65 82 377 Potent Cap.: 340 398 959 454 401 817 838 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx % Used Cap.: 14.2 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 48.9 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 % Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.5 1.5 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: 0.91 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.95 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Actual Cap.: 435 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 95 74 572 56 74 377 Actual Cap.: 334 394 959 450 397 817 838 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 373 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 44 74 528 56 74 377 Unused Cap.: 334 394 959 441 397 804 825 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B • • • * * • • • * • * LOS by Move: • • • * • • A • * • • Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 156 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 601 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 60 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 579 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: • * • • • * • E • • • * Shared LOS: • * * * A • • • • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4 -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/26/1994 10:53:30 II INTERSECTION: Tigard, OR - Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald St. VOLUMES: 1995 Total Traffic AM Peak with Full Access METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: DMB II FILE NAME: WSAM.SIG !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 90 G= 74 Y= 16 II ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D -E * 1 ! * SATURATION 87% * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! . ! . ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I 1 APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! I LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! 1 ! RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ! II 3 ! L. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 ! 4 ! .0 L. 12.0 .0 .0 ! ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R L T R! SOUTH ! 195 1505 160 1860 ! 87% 87% 87% ! D -E D -E D -E ! NORTH ! 105 690 45 840 ! 81% 50% 22% ! D A A ! WEST ! 65 180 5 250 ! 57% 87% 19% ! B D -E A ! EAST ! 80 80 75 235 ! 66% 78% 78% . C D D ! II APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! II S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! __ ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! ! !N /S -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! . E ! -- . ! ! II ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! II ! TR ! .463 .000 .000 .086 R ! .089 .025 .003 .042 R -ADJ! .000 .023 .002 .000 II T ! .418 .192 .100 .044 L ! 112 .060 .037 .046 ! II N -S V/C =.529 E -W V/C =.167 TOTAL AMBER =.178 MINIMUM V/C =.067 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE II LEG ! AT LOS C APPR ! L T R L T R ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 2130 ! SOUTH ! 11.9 49.2 49.2 ! 211 472 0 ! NORTH ! 2009 ! NORTH ! 7.1 44.4 51.4 ! 121 219 24 II WEST ! 461 ! WEST ! 7.1 10.6 22.6 ! 75 198 5 EAST ! 550 ! EAST ! 7.1 10.6 10.6 ! 92 171 0 . II III. alill OM IIIII OM a IIIIII MO I MI MB M in M MI 1111111 OM OM all 1327WSPM.IN Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:48:14 Page 1 -1 1327WSPM.IN Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:48:14 Page 2 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway Trip Generation Report Trip Distribution Report Forecast for Percent Of Trips Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total 2 Of To Gates # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total 1 2 3 4 5 7 Zone 1 30.0 25.0 30.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 1 SITE 75.00 NET NEW TRIPS 0.52 0.48 39 36 75 74.3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal 39 36 75 74.3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 2 25.00 N -S Pass -Bys 0.00 0.54 0 14 14 13.9 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Zone 2 Subtotal 0 14 14 13.9 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 4 S -N Pass -Bys 25.00 S -N Pass -Bys 0.00 0.46 0 12 12 11.9 Zone 4 Subtotal 0 12 12 11.9 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 TOTAL 39 62 101 100.0 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 r r 1 1 r 1 ' 1 1 1327WSPM.IN Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:48:14 Page 3 -1 1327WSPM.IN Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:48:14 Page 4 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street # 1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald D 34.2 0.951 D 35.5 0.963 + 1.316 D/V Base 221 1221 134 144 1550 118 77 129 15 160 211 144 4125 Added 2 9 0 7 9 0 0 2 2 0 2 8 41 # 2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W D xxxxx 0.000 E xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Total 224 1230 134 151 1559 118 77 131 18 160 213 152 4166 # 3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaar B xxxxx 0.000 B xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Base 2 1442 0 0 1813 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 3263 Added 29 -12 0 0 -14 26 23 0 30 0 0 0 81 Total 31 1430 0 0 1799 28 25 0 32 0 0 0 3344 Arterial Base Future Change Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 221 0 0 551 2 781 Added 0 0 0 4 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 4 20 Total 0 0 0 6 0 7 8 221 0 0 551 6 800 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 r i 1 1 r 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1327WSPM.IN Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:48:14 Page 5 -1 1327WSPM.IN Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:48:14 Page 6 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method 1985 HCM Operations Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Cycle (sec): 140 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.963 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec /veh): 35.5 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D I II 11 II I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L RT RT I II II II I #LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected I II II II I Rights: Include Include Include Include HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 t Hev Veh: 5 3 3 3 I II II II I Grade: 0% Ot 0% 0% Volume Module: Parking /Hr: No No No No Base Vol: 215 1185 130 140 1505 115 75 125 15 155 205 140 Bus Stp /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Area Type: c < < < < < < < < < < < < c c Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Initial Bse: 221 1221 134 144 1550 118 77 129 15 160 211 144 Cnft Ped /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 2 9 0 7 9 0 0 2 2 0 2 8 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Initial Fut: 224 1230 134 151 1559 118 77 131 18 160 213 152 % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 11 II II I PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: PHF Volume: 235 1291 141 159 1636 124 81 137 18 168 224 159 f(rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Reduced Vol: 235 1291 141 159 1636 124 81 137 18 168 224 159 I II II II I PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 235 1291 141 159 1636 124 81 137 18 168 224 159 Hev Veh Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 I II II II I Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Sat /Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.42 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.94 0.94 Final Sat.: 1667 3133 342 1684 3546 1507 1684 1773 1507 1684 975 692 LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I HCM Sat Adj: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Capacity Analysis Module: Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vol /Sat: 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.09 0.46 0.08 0.05 0.08 0.01 0.10 0.23 0.23 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit Moves: •••• •••• •••• •••• Fnl Sat Adj: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Green /Cycle: 0.15 0.51 0.51 0.12 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.24 0.24 I II II II I Volume /Cap: 0.96 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.96 0.17 0.96 0.61 0.09 0.61 0.96 0.96 Progresssion Adjustment Factor Module: I II I I I I I Signal Type: < < < < < < < c < < < < c Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > Level Of Service Module: Volume /Cap: 0.96 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.96 0.17 0.96 0.61 0.09 0.61 0.96 0.96 Delay /Veh: 79.9 23.9 23.9 60.5 37.2 15.7 113 47.5 41.1 44.3 66.2 66.2 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 AdjDel /Veh: 79.9 20.3 20.3 60.5 31.6 13.4 113 40.4 35.0 44.3 56.2 56.2 Queue: 12 48 48 7 68 3 5 5 1 6 18 18 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111 11111 1 s 1 111111 s11111 11111 1327WSPM.IN Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:48:14 Page 7 -1 1327WSPM.IN Thu Sep 1, 1994 09:48:14 Page 8 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with Full Access Driveway Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Intersection #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Level Of Service: E Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 1400 0 0 1760 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 215 0 0 535 2 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 2 1442 0 0 1813 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Bee: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 221 0 0 551 2 Added Vol: 29 -12 0 0 -14 26 23 0 30 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 4 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 4 Initial Fut: 31 1430 0 0 1799 28 25 0 32 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 6 0 7 8 221 0 0 551 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 35 1589 0 0 1999 31 27 0 35 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 7 0 8 9 246 0 0 612 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 35 1589 0 0 1999 31 27 0 35 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 7 0 8 9 246 0 0 612 7 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Grade: 0% Ot 0% 0% V Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 38 1589 0 0 1999 31 30 0 39 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 7 0 9 10 246 0 0 612 7 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(N /S): 30 MPH « Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(E /W): 30 MPH « RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 Critical Gp: 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx I 11 II II 1 I it 11 11 1 Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 2030 xxxx xxxxx 1589 xxxx xxxxx 3638 3638 1015 3688 3653 795 Cnflict Vol: 882 874 246 871 871 616 619 xxxx xxxxx 246 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 152 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 266 65 82 432 Potent Cap.: 275 330 844 332 332 466 616 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx % Used Cap.: 23.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 28.8 0.0 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 % Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 2.0 1.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: 0.84 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.90 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Actual Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 152 xxxx xxxxx 88 69 266 49 69 432 Actual Cap.: 269 327 844 329 329 466 616 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 127 xxxx xxxxx 152 xxxx xxxxx 58 69 227 49 69 432 Unused Cap.: 269 327 844 321 329 456 607 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: D • • • • • • * • • • • LOS by Move: • • * • • * A • • • * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 141 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 392 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 72 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 376 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: • • * • * • • E • * • * Shared LOS: * • * • B • • * * * • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4 1 -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/26/1994 10:54:39 11 INTERSECTION: Tigard, OR - Highway 99W /SW Gaarde- McDonald St. VOLUMES: 1995 Total Traffic PM Peak with Full Access METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: DMB II FILE NAME: WSPM.SIG !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 140 G =124 Y= 16 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL E * II ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 92% ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1 ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! 1 LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! 1 ! RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ! II 3 ! L. 12.0 T. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 ! 4 ! 0 L. 12.0 .0 .0 ! I ! APPR MOVEMENT VOLUMES L T R TOT ! L ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! ! T R ! L T R! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 225 1230 135 1590 ! 92% 82% 82% ! E D D ! II NORTH ! 150 1560 120 1830 ! 65% 92% 23% ! C E A 1 WEST ! 75 130 20 225 ! 92% 49% 16% ! E A A ! EAST . 160 215 150 525 ! 92% 92% 92% ! E E E ! 1 APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! II S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! __ ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! ! !N /S -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E 1 5.0 %! ! E ! -- . ! ! 1 ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! II ! TR ! .379 .000 .000 .203 R ! .075 .067 .011 .083 1 R -ADJ! .000 .063 .009 .000 T ! .342 .433 .072 .119 L ! .129 .086 .043 .092 ! II N -S V/C =.563 E -W V/C =.246 TOTAL AMBER =.114 MINIMUM V/C =.043 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! 1 LEG ! AT LOS C! APPR ! L T R ! L T R! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 2576 ! SOUTH ! 19.8 66.5 66.5 ! 376 697 0 ! NORTH ! 2542 ! NORTH ! 19.8 66.5 73.1 ! 250 797 112 ! I WEST ! 607 ! WEST ! 6.6 23.6 43.4 ! 139 210 27 ! EAST ! 727 ! EAST ! 14.1 31.1 31.1 ! 280 552 0 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r RIROAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:15:32 Page 1 -1 RIROAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:15:33 Page 2 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway Trip Generation Report Trip Distribution Report Forecast for Percent Of Trips Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total t Of To Gates # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 30.0 25.0 30.0 15.0 0.0 1 SITE 110.00 NET NEW TRIPS 0.51 0.49 56 54 110 75.9 2 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 Zone 1 Subtotal 56 54 110 75.9 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2 N -S Pass -Bys 35.00 N -S Pass -Bys 0.00 0.31 0 11 11 7.6 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Zone 2 Subtotal 0 11 11 7.6 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 4 S -N Pass -Bys 35.00 S -N Pass -Bys 0.00 0.69 0 24 24 16.6 Zone 4 Subtotal 0 24 24 16.6 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 TOTAL 56 89 145 100.0 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RIROAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:15:33 Page 3 -1 RIROAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:15:33 Page 4 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street # 1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald C 17.9 0.840 C 19.9 0.850 + 1.989 D/V Base 191 1494 160 93 675 46 67 175 2 82 77 62 3123 Added 41 -24 0 11 13 0 40 3 3 0 14 0 100 # 2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Total 231 1470 160 104 688 46 107 178 5 82 91 62 3223 # 3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaar A xxxxx 0.000 A xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Base 0 1622 0 0 814 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 2440 Added 0 16 0 0 -11 28 0 0 35 0 0 0 68 Total 0 1638 0 0 803 30 0 0 37 0 0 0 2508 Arterial Base Future Change Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 242 0 0 314 2 564 Added 0 0 0 46 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 55 117 Total 0 0 0 48 0 10 10 242 0 0 314 57 681 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1 1 1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 r r 1 1 1 1 RIROAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:15:33 Page 5 -1 RIROAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:15:33 Page 6 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method 1985 HCM Operations Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.850 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec /veh): 19.9 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 87 Level Of Service: C I II II II I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L RT RT II II II I #LnsinGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected I II II II I Rights: Include Include Include Include HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 4 Hev Veh: 6 11 3 7 I II II II I Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume Module: Parking /Hr: No No No No Base Vol: 185 1450 155 90 655 45 65 170 2 80 75 60 Bus Stp /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < c c c Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > » > Initial Bse: 191 1494 160 93 675 46 67 175 2 82 77 62 Cnft Ped /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 41 -24 0 11 13 0 40 3 3 0 14 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Initial Fut: 231 1470 160 104 688 46 107 178 5 82 91 62 t RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I II II II I PHF Adj: 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: PHF Volume: 246 1562 170 110 731 49 114 189 6 88 97 66 f(rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Reduced Vol: 246 1562 170 110 731 49 114 189 6 88 97 66 I II II II I PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 246 1562 170 110 731 49 114 189 6 88 97 66 Hev Veh Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 I II II 11 I Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Sat /Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.91 0.91 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.40 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.94 0.94 Final Sat.: 1659 3118 339 1618 3406 1447 1684 1773 1507 1650 972 661 LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I HCM Sat Adj: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.91 0.91 Capacity Analysis Module: Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vol /Sat: 0.15 0.50 0.50 0.07 0.21 0.03 0.07 0.11 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.10 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Fnl Sat Adj: 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.80 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.92 0.91 0.91 Green /Cycle: 0.27 0.59 0.59 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.12 0.12 I II II II I Volume /Cap: 0.54 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.54 0.09 0.85 0.81 0.03 0.81 0.85 0.85 Progresssion Adjustment Factor Module: I II II II I Signal Type: <<<<<c<< <<c<c Actuated > >>> > > > >> > >>> Level Of Service Module: Volume /Cap: 0.54 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.54 0.09 0.85 0.81 0.03 0.81 0.85 0.85 Delay /Veh: 22.2 14.1 14.1 56.9 16.2 12.9 56.3 41.8 25.9 54.9 49.0 49.0 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 AdjDel /Veh: 22.2 12.0 12.0 56.9 13.8 11.0 56.3 35.5 22.0 54.9 41.7 41.7 Queue: 5 38 38 4 14 1 4 6 0 3 5 5 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 RIROAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:15:33 Page 7 -1 RIROAM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:15:33 Page 8 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic A.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Intersection #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Level Of Service: A Level Of Service: A Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 11 1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 11 11 11 1 I 11 II 11 I Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1575 0 0 790 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 235 0 0 305 2 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 0 1622 0 0 814 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 242 0 0 314 2 Added Vol: 0 16 0 0 -11 28 0 0 35 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 46 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 55 Initial Fut: 0 1638 0 0 803 30 0 0 37 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 48 0 10 10 242 0 0 314 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 1821 0 0 892 33 0 0 41 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 53 0 11 12 269 0 0 349 63 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 1821 0 0 892 33 0 0 41 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 53 0 11 12 269 0 0 349 63 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: Ot Ot Ot 04 Grade: Ot Ot Ot Ot t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 1821 0 0 892 33 0 0 45 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 59 0 12 13 269 0 0 349 63 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 cc » Run Speed(N /S): 30 MPH cc Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(E /W): 30 MPH cc RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 1 II 11 11 I I 11 11 11 I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 925 xxxx xxxxx 1821 xxxx xxxxx 2729 2729 463 2786 2746 910 Cnflict Vol: 704 693 134 661 661 206 412 xxxx xxxxx 269 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 435 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 572 65 82 366 Potent Cap.: 318 364 959 438 383 794 788 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx V Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 t Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 1.6 1.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.95 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Actual Cap.: 435 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 572 62 82 366 Actual Cap.: 312 361 959 434 380 794 788 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx 1 11 11 11 1 I 11 11 11 Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 435 xxxx xxxxx 130 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 528 62 82 366 Unused Cap.: 312 361 959 375 380 782 775 xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: • * • • • * * * A • • * LOS by Move: • * • • • • A • • • • • Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 471 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 400 xxxxx XXXX XXXX xxxxx XXXX xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: • • • * • • • • ' • • ' Shared LOS: * • • • A • * • • * • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RIROPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:17:32 Page 1 -1 RIROPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:17:32 Page 2 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway Trip Generation Report Trip Distribution Report Forecast for Percent Of Trips Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total f Of To Gates # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Total 1 2 3 4 5 7 Zone 1 30.0 25.0 30.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 1 SITE 75.00 NET NEW TRIPS 0.52 0.48 39 36 75 74.3 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Zone 1 Subtotal 39 36 75 74.3 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 2 25.00 N -S Pass -Bys 0.00 0.54 0 14 14 13.9 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Zone 2 Subtotal 0 14 14 13.9 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 4 S -N Pass -Bys 25.00 S -N Pass -Bys 0.00 0.46 0 12 12 11.9 Zone 4 Subtotal 0 12 12 11.9 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 TOTAL 39 62 101 100.0 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1 II II -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/26/1994 10:55:51 INTERSECTION: Tigard, OR - Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald St. VOLUMES: 1995 Total Traffic AM Peak with RIRO Access METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: DMB II FILE NAME: RIROAM.SIG !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 90 G= 74 Y= 16 II ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ! I 1 ! ! ! 1 * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D -E * I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 86% ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * • ! ! ! ! ! 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! I LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! 1 ! RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ! II 3 ! L. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 ! 4 ! .0 L. 12.0 .0 .0 ! I ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R ! L T R! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 230 1470 160 1860 ! 86 %. 86% 86% ! D -E D -E D -E ! II NORTH ! 105 690 45 840 ! 80% 52% 22% ! D B A ! WEST ! 105 180 5 290 ! 80% 86% 19% ! D D -E A ! EAST ! 80 90 60 230 ! 65% 75% 75% ! C C -D C -D ! I APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I/ S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! __ ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! ! !N /S -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- ! ! ! II ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST 1 TR ! .453 .000 .000 .083 R ! .089 .025 .003 .033 II R -ADJ! .000 .023 .002 .000 T ! .408 .192 .100 .050 L ! .132 .060 .060 .046 I N -S V/C =.519 E -W V/C =.167 TOTAL AMBER =.178 MINIMUM V/C =.067 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! I LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L ! T R ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 2159 ! SOUTH ! 14.3 48.8 48.8 ! 242 466 0 ! NORTH ! 2028 ! NORTH ! 7.2 41.8 49.0 ! 121 231 26 ! II WEST ! 536 ! WEST ! 7.2 10.8 25.0 ! 121 198 5 ! EAST ! 553 ! EAST ! 7.2 10.8 10.8 ! 92 165 0 ! II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIII 1 1 1 1 1 1 RIROPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:17:32 Page 3 -1 RIROPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:17:32 Page 4 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway Turning Movement Report Impact Analysis Report Level Of Service Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Intersection Base Future Change Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street # 1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald D 34.2 0.951 D 39.3 0.993 + 5.160 D/V Base 221 1221 134 144 1550 118 77 129 15 160 211 144 4125 Added 24 -12 0 7 9 0 23 2 2 0 10 0 64 # 2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W C xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Total 245 1209 134 151 1559 118 100 131 18 160 221 144 4189 # 3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaar B xxxxx 0.000 C xxxxx 0.000 + 0.000 V/C #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Base 0 1442 0 0 1813 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 3259 Added 0 11 0 0 -14 26 0 0 30 0 0 0 52 Total 0 1453 0 0 1799 28 0 0 32 0 0 0 3311 Arterial Base Future Change Trvl Avg. Trvl Avg. in Avg. #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Dir LOS Time Speed LOS Time Speed Speed Base 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 221 0 0 551 2 781 Added 0 0 0 27 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 33 71 Total 0 0 0 29 0 7 8 221 0 0 551 35 852 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RIROPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:17:32 Page 5 -1 RIROPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:17:32 Page 6 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report 1985 HCM Operations Method 1985 HCM Operations Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Intersection #1 Highway 99W /SW Gaarde - McDonald Street Cycle (sec): 140 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.993 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Sound West Bound Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec /veh): 39.3 Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: D I II II II I HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 Movement: L - T- R L - T- R L - T- R L- T- R Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L RT RT I II II I1 I #LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected I II 11 II I Rights: Include Include Include Include HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 t Hev Veh: 5 3 3 3 I II II II I Grade: of Ot 0% of Volume Module: Parking /Hr: No No No No Base Vol: 215 1185 130 140 1505 115 75 125 15 155 205 140 Bus Stp /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Area Type: < < < < < < < < < c < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Initial Bse: 221 1221 134 144 1550 118 77 129 15 160 211 144 Cnft Ped /Hr: 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 24 -12 0 7 9 0 23 2 2 0 10 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include Initial Fut: 245 1209 134 151 1559 118 100 131 18 160 221 144 t RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I II II II I PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: PHF Volume: 257 1268 141 159 1636 124 105 137 18 168 232 151 f(rt) Case: xxxx 5 5 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx xxxx 2 xxxx 5 5 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx Reduced Vol: 257 1268 141 159 1636 124 105 137 18 168 232 151 I II II II I PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 257 1268 141 159 1636 124 105 137 18 168 232 151 Hev Veh Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 I II II II I Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Sat /Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Adjustment: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.80 0.20 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.39 RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.94 0.94 Final Sat.: 1667 3127 348 1684 3546 1507 1684 1773 1507 1684 1010 657 LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I HCM Sat Adj: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Capacity Analysis Module: Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vol /Sat: 0.15 0.41 0.41 0.09 0.46 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.01 0.10 0.23 0.23 MLF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Crit Moves: •••• '••• '•'• "•. Fnl Sat Adj: 0.93 0.97 0.97 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.98 0.84 0.94 0.93 0.93 Green /Cycle: 0.16 0.50 0.50 0.12 0.46 0.46 0.06 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.23 0.23 I II II II I Volume /Cap: 0.99 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.99 0.18 0.99 0.60 0.09 0.60 0.99 0.99 Progresssion Adjustment Factor Module: I II II II I Signal Type: << <<<<<<<<<<c Actuated >> > > > > > >> > >>> Level Of Service Module: Volume /Cap: 0.99 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.99 0.18 0.99 0.60 0.09 0.60 0.99 0.99 Delay /Veh: 85.9 24.2 24.2 60.1 43.8 16.6 115 46.9 40.9 43.7 74.2 74.2 ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 ProgAdjFctr: 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 AdjDel /Veh: 85.9 20.5 20.5 60.1 37.3 14.1 115 39.9 34.8 43.7 63.1 63.1 Queue: 14 47 47 7 72 3 7 5 1 6 20 20 Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RIROPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:17:32 Page 7 -1 RIROPM.CMD Thu Sep 1, 1994 10:17:32 Page 8 -1 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Kittelson and Assiciates, Inc. - Project No. - 1327.00 Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis Boston Chicken Traffic Impact Analysis 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway 1995 Total Traffic P.M. Traffic Volumes with RIRO Access Driveway Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method 1985 HCM Unsignalized Method Future Volume Alternative Future Volume Alternative Intersection #2 Access Driveway /Highway 99W Intersection #3 Shared Access Driveway /SW Gaarde St Level Of Service: C Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 11 11 11 1 I 11 11 11 I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 II II II 1 { II II 11 I Volume Module: Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1400 0 0 1760 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 Base Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 215 0 0 535 2 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Initial Bse: 0 1442 0 0 1813 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 221 0 0 551 2 Added Vol: 0 11 0 0 -14 26 0 0 30 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 27 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 33 Initial Fut: 0 1453 0 0 1799 28 0 0 32 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 29 0 7 8 221 0 0 551 35 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 1614 0 0 1999 31 0 0 35 0 0 0 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 32 0 8 9 246 0 0 612 39 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 1614 0 0 1999 31 0 0 35 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 0 0 32 0 8 9 246 0 0 612 39 Adjusted Volume Module: Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% Ot Of Ot Grade: 06 Ot Ot Ot t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Cycle /Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx t Truck /Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Cycl /Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Trck /Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Adj Vol.: 0 1614 0 0 1999 31 0 0 39 0 0 0 Adj Vol.: 0 0 0 35 0 9 10 246 0 0 612 39 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 « » Run Speed(N /S): 30 MPH « Critical Gap Module: » Population: 0 c< » Run Speed(E /W): 30 MPH c< RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg RT Rad /Ang: 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg 20.0 ft /90.0 deg Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 6.0 6.5 6.0 7.0 6.5 5.5 Critical Gp: 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 1 II II 11 1 1 11 11 11 I Capacity Module: Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 2030 xxxx xxxxx 1614 xxxx xxxxx 3628 3628 1015 3679 3644 807 Cnflict Vol: 915 906 246 887 887 632 652 xxxx xxxxx 246 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 147 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 266 65 82 426 Potent Cap.: 264 316 844 325 325 456 594 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx t Used Cap.: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 t Used Cap.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 2.0 1.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Impedance: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 0.90 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Impedance: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 0.99 0.99 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx Actual Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 147 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 266 59 82 426 Actual Cap.: 258 313 844 322 322 456 594 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx 1 II II II 1 1 II II II 1 Level Of Service Module: Level Of Service Module: Unused Cap.: 165 xxxx xxxxx 147 xxxx xxxxx 105 82 227 59 82 426 Unused Cap.: 258 313 844 287 322 447 584 xxxx xxxxx 943 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * • * * * * C * • • LOS by Move: * * * • • • A * * • * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 343 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Unused Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 299 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * • • * • ' • • • • • Shared LOS: • • • • C • • • * • • • Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Traffix System Version 6.6 (c) 1992 DA Licensed to Kittelson & Associ Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4 1 II INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/26/1994 10:57: 0 INTERSECTION: Tigard, OR - Highway 99W /SW Gaarde- McDonald St. VOLUMES: 1995 Total Traffic PM Peak with RIRO Access METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 ANALYST: DMB I FILE NAME: RIROPM.SIG !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 140 G =124 Y= 16 I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** t ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL E * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 95% ! ! ! II ! ! ! ! * * • ! . ! . . ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1 ! APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! I LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! 1 ! RT. 12.0 R.. 12.0 R.. 12.0 ! RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ! I 3 ! L.. 12.0 T. 12.0 L.. 12.0 ... .0 4 ! .0 L. 12.0 .0 .0 ! I ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R ! L T R! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 245 1210 135 1590 ! 950 83% 83% ! E D D ! I NORTH ! 150 1560 120 1830 ! 63% 95% 23% ! C E A ! WEST ! 100 130 20 250 ! 95% 47% 16% ! E A A ! EAST . 160 220 145 525 ! 95% 95% 95% ! E E E ! I APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! ! I N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! . E ! -- . ! ! II ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! 1 ' TR ! .374 .000 .000 .203 R ! .075 .067 .011 .081 R -ADJ! .000 .062 .009 .000 ! I T ! .336 .433 .072 .122 L ! 141 .086 .057 .092 I N -S V/C =.574 E -W V/C =.260 TOTAL AMBER =.114 MINIMUM V/C =.043 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! I LEG ! AT LOS C ! ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 2497 ! SOUTH ! 20.9 64.4 64.4 !STORAGE LENGTHS! NORTH ! 2463 ! NORTH ! 20.9 64.4 72.9 !NOT RELIABLE AT! I WEST ! 626 ! WEST ! 8.5 25.0 45.9 !THIS LEVEL OF ! EAST ! 704 ! EAST ! 13.7 30.1 30.1 !SERVICE ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Nr 1 . 1 1 Appendix G D 1 Queue/Stacking Calculations 1 1 • 1 SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS 1 Project Name: BOSTON CHICKEN D KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: 1327 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: DMB Port Oregon 97205 I Date: 08/30/94 '; (503) 228 -5230 Filename: H : \PROJFILE\1327\TRAFFIX\SIGQWSA Fax: (503) 273 - 8169 I Intersection: PACIFIC HIGHWAY /SW GAARDE ST Conditions (yr, alt., etc.): :1995,WITH SITE_FULL ACCESS AM PEAK . I GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: 90 sec Confidence Level (C.L.): 95 %' Storage length /vehicle: 25 feet 1 APPROACH /MOVEMENT I #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 NBLT NBTH /R1 SBLT SBTH EBLT EBTH/RT WBLT SBRT INPUT PARAMETERS: 1 Volume (pre -PHF) (vph): 195 1670 105 690 65 180 80 45 G/C for movement: 0.24 0.61 0.08 0.44 0.05 0.12 0.06 0.44 Number of lanes: 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval (sec): 68.4 35.1 82.8 50.4 85.5 79.2 84.6 50.4 I Average total queue (veh): 3.7 16.3 2.4 9.7 1.5 4.0 1.9 0.6 Maximum total queue (veh): 7 23 5 15 4 7 4 2 Total queue length (feet): 175 575 125 375 100 175 100 50 Required storage /lane (feet): 175 300 125 200 100 100 100 50 1 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume (pre -PHF): I Opposing sat. flow rate: CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo): I Unblocked G /C: Effective red interval (sec): Average total queue (veh): I Maximum total queue (veh): Total queue length (feet): Required storage /lane (feet): 1 METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: I Length of red interval = (1 - G /C)' Cycle length Oueue length = Maximum queue' Storage length per vehicle Average queue/lane = Volume • Red Interval / 3600 Required storage per lane = Oueue length / Number of lanes, rounded I Maximum queue: Random arrival /Constant service up to the next highest whole vehicle Random arrivals behave according to a Poisson distribution. Opposing flow ratio Yo = opposing volume vo / opposing sat. flow rate sop There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired (e.g. 95%) that the queue formed during each red interval will be less than Unblocked G/C (gu /C) = (g/C - Yo) /(1 -Yo) I or equal to the maximum queue. (Prob. of arrivals = N) _ (Red Interval)AN • exp( -N) / NI (the Poisson distribution) (Prob. of arrivals >= N) = 1 - Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0, 1, ..., N -1 1 Max N: Highest N such that the sum of probabilities > (1 - confidence level) 1 SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS 1 Project Name: BOSTON CHICKEN D KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: 1327 . 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: .DMB Portland, Oregon 97205 I Date: 08/30/94 (503) 228 -5230 Filename: H : \PROJFILE\1327\TRAFFIX\SIGOWSP Fax: (503) 273 -8169 I I. . Intersection: PACIFIC HIGHWAY /SW GAARDE ST Conditions (yr, alt., etc.): -1995 WITH SITE FULL ACCESS PM PEAK I GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: 140 sec Confidence Level (C.L.): 95 % Storage length /vehicle: 25' feet 1 APPROACH /MOVEMENT I #1 #2 #3 #4 - #5 #6 #7 #8 NBLT NBTH /R1 SBLT SBTH EBLT EBTH/R1 WBLT SBRT INPUT PARAMETERS: I Volume (pre -PHF) (vph): 220 1365 G/C for movement: 0.14 0.52 0.11 150 1560 75 145 160 120 0.49 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.49 Number of lanes: 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 I CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval (sec): 120.4 67.2 124.6 71.4 133.0 123.2 117.6 71.4 I Average total queue (veh): 7.4 25.5 5.2 30.9 2.8 5.0 5.2 2.4 Maximum total queue (veh): 12 34 9 40 6 9 9 5 Total queue length (feet): 300 850 225 1000 150 225 225 125 Required storage /lane (feet): 300 425 225 500 150 125 225 125 1 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume (pre -PHF): I Opposing sat. flow rate: CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo): I Unblocked G /C: Effective red interval (sec): Average total queue (veh): I Maximum total queue (veh): Total queue length (feet): Required storage /lane (feet): 1 METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: I Length of red interval = (1 - G /C) • Cycle length Queue length = Maximum queue • Storage length per vehicle Average queue/lane = Volume • Red Interval / 3600 Required storage per lane = Queue length / Number of lanes, rounded I up to the next highest whole vehicle Maximum queue: Random arrival /Constant service Random arrivals behave according to a Poisson distribution. Opposing flow ratio Yo = opposing volume vo / opposing sat. flow rate sop There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired (e.g. 95 %) that the queue formed during each red interval will be less than Unblocked G/C (gu/C) = (g/C - Yo) /(1 -Yo) I or equal to the maximum queue. (Prob. of arrivals = N) = (Red Interval)AN • exp( -N) / N! (the Poisson distribution) (Prob. of arrivals >= N) = 1 - Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0, 1, ..., N -1 1 Max N: Highest N such that the sum of probabilities > (1 - confidence level) 1 SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS 1 Project Name: BOSTON CHICKEN KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: 1327 D 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: DMB Portland, Oregon 97205 I Date: 08/30/94 :,_.• • (503) 228 -5230 Filename: H \PROJFILE\1327\TRAFFIX\SIGQRRAI Fax: (503) 273 -8169 I Intersection: :PACIFIC HIGHWAY /SW GAARDE ST Conditions (yr, alt., etc.): '1995 WITH SITE RIRO AM PEAK I GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: Cycle Length: 90 sec Confidence Level (C.L.): 95 %. Storage length /vehicle: 25 feet 1 APPROACH /MOVEMENT I #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 NBLT NBTH /RT SBLT SBTH EBLT EBTH/RT WBLT SBRT INPUT PARAMETERS: I Volume (pre-PHF) (vph): 230 1635 105 690 105 180 80 45 0.27 G/C for movement: 0.60 0.08 0.41 0.08 0.13 0.06 0.41 Number of lanes: 1 . 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval (sec): 65.7 36.0 82.8 53.1 82.8 78.3 84.6 53.1 Average total queue (veh): 4.2 16.4 2.4 10.2 2.4 3.9 1.9 0.7 I Maximum total queue (veh): 8 23 5 16 5 7 4 2 Total queue length (feet): 200 575 125 400 125 175 100 50 Required storage /lane (feet): 200 300 125 150 125 100 100 50 1 PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume (pre -PHF): :. 155 180 I Opposing sat. flow rate: 1800 1800 CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo): 0.09 0.10 I Unblocked G /C: 0.00 0.00 Effective red interval (sec): 90.0 90.0 Average total queue (veh): 2.6 2.0 I Maximum total queue (veh): 6 5 12 Total queue length (feet): 150 125 Required storage /lane (feet): 150 125 1 METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: I Length of red interval = (1 - G /C) • Cycle length Queue length = Maximum queue • Storage length per vehicle Average queue/lane = Volume • Red Interval / 3600 Required storage per lane = Queue length / Number of lanes, rounded I up to the next highest whole vehicle Maximum queue: Random arrival /Constant service Random arrivals behave according to a Poisson distribution. Opposing flow ratio Yo = opposing volume vo / opposing sat. flow rate sop There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired (e.g. 95 %) that the queue formed during each red interval will be less than Unblocked G/C (gu/C) = (g/C - Yo) /(1 -Yo) I or equal to the maximum queue. (Prob. of arrivals = N) = (Red Interval)AN • exp( -N) / N! (the Poisson distribution) (Prob. of arrivals >= N) = 1 - Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0, 1, ..., N -1 I Max N: Highest N such that the sum of probabilities > (1 - confidence level) 1 SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS Project Name: � BOSTON CHICKEN D KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Project Number: 1327 610 SW Alder, Suite 700 Analyst: DMB Portland, Oregon 97205 I Date: 08/30/94 (503) 228 -5230 Filename: H: \PROJFILE11327\TRAFFIX\SIGORRPI Fax: (503) 273 -8169 I Intersection: :PACIFIC HIGHWAY /SW GAARDE ST • Conditions (yr, alt., etc.): 1995 WITH SITE RIRO PM PEAK GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: I Cycle Length: 140 sec Confidence Level (C.L.): 95 %' Storage length/vehicle: 25 feet I , APPROACH /MOVEMENT _ #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 1 NBLT NBTH /R1 SBLT SBTH EBLT EBTH/R1 WBLT SBRT INPUT PARAMETERS: I Volume (pre -PHF) (vph): 240 1345 0.15 0.51 0.11 150 1560 75 145 160 120 G/C for movement: 0.48 0.06 0.13 0.16 0.48 Number of lanes: 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 I CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval (sec): 119.0 68.6 124.6 72.8 131.6 121.8 117.6 72.8 Average total queue (veh): 7.9 25.6 5.2 31.5 2.7 4.9 5.2 2.4 I Maximum total queue (veh): 13 34 9 41 22 6 9 9 5 Total queue length (feet): 325 850 225 1025 150 225 225 125 Required storage /lane (feet): 325 425 225 350 150 125 225 125 I PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume (pre -PHF): 365 130 Opposing sat. flow rate: 1800 1800 1 CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo): 0.20 0.07 I Unblocked G /C: 0.00 0.09 Effective red interval (sec): 140.0 126.8 Average total queue (veh): 2.9 5.6 • Maximum total queue (veh): 6 10 U Total queue length (feet): 150 250 Required storage /lane (feet): 150 250 I METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS USED: ' Length of red interval = (1 - G /C) • Cycle length Queue length = Maximum queue ' Storage length per vehicle Average queue/lane = Volume ' Red Interval / 3600 Required storage per lane = Queue length / Number of lanes, rounded up to the next highest whole vehicle I Maximum queue: Random arrival/Constant service Random arrivals behave according to a Poisson distribution. i Opposng flow ratio Yo = opposing volume vo / opposing sat. flow rate sop There is a probability equal to the confidence level desired (e.g. 95%) that the queue formed during each red interval will be less than Unblocked G/C (gu/C) = (g/C - Yo) /(1 -Yo) 1 or equal to the maximum queue. (Prob. of arrivals = N) = (Red Interval)AN ' exp( -N) / N! (the Poisson distribution) (Prob. of arrivals >= N) = 1 - Sum of probabilities for vehicles 0, 1, ..., N -1 Max N: Highest N such that the sum of probabilities > (1 - confidence level) 1 . • 11-18-1994 11:43F1 BENTLEY ENG. CO. 1 503 222 2996 P.01 _ e , ., . dip les i imum = 25.1 I Minimum = .22 Maximum/Minimum = 114.09 LUMINAIRE • NO. LABEL X—COORD Y Z ORIENT TILT 1 8 60 10 26 90 0 : .ANE A. -.) i3 140 2 26 90 0 : 3 8 238 20 26 135 0 4 e 265 110 26 180 0 • 5 c 3 270 188 26 270 0 6 iTi 175 2.88 26 270 0 . . 7 P 65 168 26 315 o . • 8 B 15 90 26 0 0 , 8 : TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCATIONS = 8 AVERAGE TILTED LAMP CORRECTION FACTOR APPLIED = 1 _..- -- 2.its Postit'm brand fax transmittal memo 7671 # of pages • i /1 • ' / ! lb 4 V4) en a 'Y'■-• V" TA V+ "././s • • .911 / / 1 CO. Co 13/ s Vi4niAly i NJ • Dept. Phone # 2 12 — / Fax # 2-ZZ Zei.. . I 1 • 1 5 : 0 ,17' • lOse Manufacturers' .%. Representative eity Lighting & Electrical i Reps .. • PO Box 5452 \ ---...- 40 360 • Pentane!. OR 97208 1.1 -18 - 1994 11 :43A�1 BENTLEY ENG. CO. 1 503 222 2996 P.02 4 110 . i • NUMERICAL ANALYSIS All values are in'footcand . . SOSTTIG1.PT : ENTIRE AREA ' Average = 903 Max Average /Minimum = 41.05 • )M \LST \LSI002i25_IES PLANE OF ANALYSIS HORIZONTAL WORKPLANE HEIGHT =.p I . LIGHT METER IS NORMAL TO PL.. i SCALE . 1 inch, = 40 f t . • -CT )00 1 PHOTOMETRXC TYPE = 1 WATTS = 1000 • IIOTH != 0 LENGTH = 0 HEIGHT = 0 BAL .AST = 1. • BALLAST -LAMP = 1 . IS : ! 0 • TO 90 • DEGREES • :2 : 0 . TO 180: DEGREES • B 6 g 3 4.70 5.94 12.Z* 14.5 B..7S 5.62 7.79 15. 15.2 5.90 2.17 ■ S.99 7.02 17.2 22.7 11.2 7.66 10.4 22.9 21.1 6.78 2.60 c , 7.21 . 5.55 11.1 11.7 8.91 8.12 11.9 15.2 10.4 4.09 1!.91 • 4.82 4.28 5.36 9.12 8..21 14.5 25.1 15,5 5.24 2.85 i i • • +-02 d . • 3.9! • 14.9 24.2 '_3 0 3 .35 1.5 -/ . . '• n Z Bosto Chicken / { SW Pacific Hwy • 4 . 5 = _ - 9.33 1 0.2 7.96 1.97 . Tigard j•' • /' 7.52 i 5.27. 7 60 6.26 7.20 15.1 9.87 5.38 / /•. 12.4 ' 14.8 12.1 7.78 16.. 1 2 2.7 1.4.9 4.76 `u /2/ 14.2 1 22.4 13.9 7.12 9,96 1p.0N,6.29 I I 9.31 . 6_35 4.70 4.69 4.71 • • t • 1 t.• I t 1 1 i i 1 1 122 : 140 150 182 ?90 229 240 262., 220 900 320 9• , R LUMINAIRE B ASSEMBLY. TYPE :SINGLE.ASY ARM LENGTH : 14 i CAD SYMBOL :ARROW.SYM CAD SYMBOL SIZE : 5 PHOTOMETRIC FILENAME : C: \PHOTC LUMENS = 125000 • LLF = 1 SPIN = 0 FILENAME : LSI00225.IES LSX LIGHTING SYSTEMS CATALOG NUMBER: GBL -FP -- 1000 -SMN. REPORT NUMBER: ITL36o91 TILT= NONE • • LAMPS = 1 LUMENS /LAMP = 125C LUMINOUS DIMENSIONS (FEET • ) : 6 FACTORS : MULTIPLIER = 1 NUMBER OF VERTICAL ANGLES = NUMBER OF HORIZONTAL ANGLES = 2 11301.., 0.22 2.42 0.85 2.72 7.77 6.53 ' f �3 7 192 _ 0.53 1.23 2,12 11 23.1 13.2 143- 0.29 9.04 6.13 12.3 21.5 13.2 } } 1219_ 1.12 9.51 9.65 2.92 9.82 7.91 100 2.14 12.9 24.0 14.2 7.75 5.77 82- 2.37 13.4 25.1 14.5 9.41 5.50 92- 1.79 7.89 14.1 11.2 12.7 6.27 40 , 2.22 6.01 14,2 21.2 14.2 9.09 • • 20 1.89 4.40 13..1 16.7 12.3 7.98 i t8 i 4 • 0 _ 0.90 1.41 1.94 3.87 2.75 2.88 1 r I I i L. 8 20 40 60 80 100 FEB -16 -95 THU 14 16 MSA /MEI FAX NO. 5032749812 P.02 MACKENZIE /SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE • PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 S.W. BANCROFT STREET • P. O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 99201-0039 • (503) 224 -9570 • FAX (503) 2284285 gECORD OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATJ4M JOB NAME: Boston Chicken - Pacific Highway /Guarde JOB NO.: 295045 DATE OF CALL: 2/15/95 TIME: INCOMING CALL: PERSON: Mark Roberts OUTGOING CALL: XX COMPANY: City of Tigard - Planning PHONE #: 639 -4171 SUBJECT: Design Review REMARKS: If the modification results in a net increase of less than 5000 sq. ft. of building area, less than 20 vehicle trips /day, no increase in parking spaces, and minor changes in site design then it will be considered a minor modification. The minor modification will be a review by City staff which takes one to two weeks; no public notice or public meeting is required. The submittal should include a letter and one set of plans (site, landscape, building elevations). Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response wit . 8 e days of receipt. 4 o . ` + Proje M nag Planner 1i TW/kc cc: Mark Roberts - City of Tigard, Planning Chris Lind, Lisa Domenico - Boston Chicken Bob Thompson, Geraldene Moyle - MSA R \WPDATA \95 2 \95095 \15RTC1.kc FEB -16 -95 THU 14:17 MSA /MEI FAX NO. 5032749812 P.03 MACKENZIE/SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ARCHITECTURE ■ PLANNING • INTERIOR DESIGN 0690 S.W. BANCROFr STREET • P. O. BOX 69039 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201-0039 • (503) 224 -9570 • FAX (503) 228 -12A5 • RD • . ELEP • E O, VER • JOB NAME: Boston Chicken - Pacific Highway /Guarde JOB NO.: 295045 DATE OF CALL: 2/13/95 TIME: 1:15 p.m. INCOMING CALL: PERSON: Mark Roberts OUTGOING CALL: XX COMPANY: City of Tigard • Assistant Planner PHONE #: 639 -4171 SUBJECT: - _ _ "Catering" Use Within the General Commercial Zone REMARKS: A use that is primarily a restaurant (food/beverages are sold and consumed on the premises) but that also has some forrn of catering/distribution involved, is permitted in the General Commercial zone as an "eating and drinking establishment." Every effort has been made to accurately record this conversation. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response within five days of receipt. G Geraldene Moyle GEM/kc cc: Chris Lind, Lisa Domenico - Boston Chicken Bob Thompson, Tom Wright - MSA FAWPDATA1954219560113V7tLkC FEB -16 -95 THU 14:15 MSA /MEI FAX NO. 5032749812 P.01 MACKENZIE /SAITO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Architecture • Planning • Interior Design 503/224-9570 • FAX 503/228 -1285 MACKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED Civil • Structural • Surveying • Transportation 503/224 -9560 • FAX 503/228 -1285 0690 S.W. Bancroft Street P.O. Box 69039 Portland, Oregon 97201 -0039 FAX COVER SHEET Date: 2/ /d/ Project Number: 295 • 05 Company: — PL'-c. Attention: • � iv' ►� P-K- �oS�eZ FAX Project Name: ho5TN C1 Description: 213 1 -7Z From GiGhY Comments or Special Instruction: fix-- Yok2 / vi 4 t) . Cow Total Number of Pages (including this cover sheet): 3 If you did not receive all pages, please call our Records Department. ORIGINAL WILL /WILL NOT V FOLLOW BY MAIL. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The Information contained In this facsimile transmission Is confidential and Is Intended only for the use of the Individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message Is not the Intended recipient, this serves as notification that any reading, disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action In reliance on the contents of this communication Is strictly prohibited. If this transmission was received in error, Immediately notify us at 503/224-9570 to arrange for return of the original facsimile. GO 9 1 WP nwnariment I i; • n «r. • r WASTE ASSESSMENT Guidelines for Proposed Alternatives to the Minimum Standard Storage Area Requirement Project Title & Location: iY/ Ti, y _re a44 "/ Waste Assessment Checklist Completed By: 414/215 Li'- ' — Bbl Dale: iLl Lit Number of Floors: Facility Gross Square Footage: A I Principle Use(s) of Facility: 1 g.- r� / ' J 44,4 ' /44 Square Feet of Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage Area Which l �, Would Be Required Under the Minimum Standards Method: Square Feet of Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage Area Proposed on the Basis of Documentation Provided Through Waste Assessment: Indicate with a "check" whether an alternative to the minimum standard is being requested on the basis of A, B or C: ❑ A. An evaluation of the quantities and types of waste to be generated at this site indicates that an area of less than the code's specified minimum storage area for solid waste and recyclables will be adequatP, ❑ Respoiase has been provided to items 1, 2 & 4 attached; ❑ Necessary documentation is aitacbed; clables storage. ❑ Site plans reflect the locations and provisions for solid waste and rem' • recyclables storage equipment (i.e. balers, compactors, shredders) to be ❑ B. Special solid waste and/or installed at this site assure that an area of less than the code's spec ified minimum storage area for solid waste and recyclables will be adequate. • ❑ • Response has been provided to items 1.2, 3 & 4 attached; ... • ❑ Necessary documentation is attached;--2, . • recyclables storagc. ❑ Site plans reflect the locations and provisions for solid waste and recy ❑ C. Both A. and B. apply. ❑ Response has been provided to items 1, 2, 3 & 4 attached; ❑ Necessary documentation is attached; - ❑ Site plans reflect the locations and provisions for solid waste and recyclables storage. • p r ov ide an estimate of the total pounds, tons or cubic yards of solid waste and recyclables to be generated at the sitiJfacility between collection days; once it is fully operational. (Assume that the number of collection days in 7 ,^ day week is no more than 3). Consider seasonal variability to assess average as well as maximum periods of waste /' generation. Provide documentation in support of the estimate. Acceptable sources of assumptions & information for documentation: historical data on waste and recyclables generation at similar reference facilities with which the project designer is familiar; or an analysis prepared by an experienced recyclables collector or vendor of waste / recyclables storage equipment; or an analysis prepared by an independent consultant or engineer; or waste and recyclables generation data for facilities of similar size and function obtained from published studies or reports; or other forms of documentation proposed by the project designer which are deemed acceptable to this jurisdiction, at the pre - application conference. 2. Identify the recyclable materials which could potentially be recovered from the facility's waste stream and provide an estimate of their volume or amount (average and maximum weekly pounds, tons or cubic yards) Provide documentation in support of the estimate. Acceptable sources of assumptions & information for documentation: historical data on recyclables generation and/or recovery at similar reference facilities with which the project designer is familiar; or an analysis prepared by an experienced recyclables collector or vendor of waste/recyclables storage equipment; or an analysis prepared by an independent consultant or engineer; or recyclables generation and/or recovery data for facilities of similar size and function obtained from published studies or reports; or other forms of documentation proposed by the project designer which are deemed acceptable to this jurisdiction, at the pre - application conference. 3. Identify and describe special solid waste and/or recyclables storage and handling systems and equipment to be installed at this site which will reduce the amount of site area needed to store these materials. Balers, compactors or • other systems to containerize and/or densify waste or recyclables must be identified on site plans. Supporting documentation on the capabilities of scheduled equipment to handle anticipated types and quantities of material must be provided. Acceptable sources of documentation: . equipment specifications provided by the equipment vendor; or project designer descriptions of how planned systems have performed at , similar reference facilities; or an evaluation prepared by an independent consultant or engineer or, ; �E • published studies/reports on the performance.of planned . systems;,or ; 2 other forms of documentation proposed by the project designer which ^ are deemed acceptable to this jurisdiction, at the pre-application • 4. Provide calculations and supporting assumptions demonstrating that the allocated storage area(s) (square footage as well as height and lay-out) for solid waste and recyclables will adequately serve the needs of the facility. Identify • dedicated storage area(s) on facility plans. - Provide detail on storage container size, design and dimensions. .4:8 .;c _ _ . . �,.�„� 24 1942 . . . . TYP. DIRECTIONAL Y ARROWS and STOPBARS G � T1r 5 1/4 1' -0' 1/2 14' -0' 4' -0' 6' -0' 4' -0' STL. GATE W/ I --%-L A / 0 8' ROOM BLACK POLY SLATS. _ ® -- BLOCK `; (PROVIDE MIN. 2' I CONTAINER I INSIDE in CLR BETWEEN BOTT. / GREASE — — — 7 I GLIDDE OF GATE 4 SLAB I I I "50YY4 / A :.. BOLLARD (TY P ) I / • SEE DTL. 2 /SP -1 DUMPSTEI� • / I SPECIE 3' DIA STEEL / I I TRASH PIPE: - - - --� 1 RECEP L - - 6' T. CONC. SL B W/ I SERVIC , VARY I r - - - - -I GRANULAR B E - - -� ! i I OVER COMPA TED �U PRIOR 1 6x6 1.4x1.4 WWF I ' (RE: STRUCT) I c0 I DUMPSTERI 1 DUMPSTEIi / 1 0 6' -0" T.OM. I O 1 FILL W/ CONC I � __ -- I , --� __ - - J 3'4) STEEL PIPE I rn � -%- , CURB l • 141 (RE: Lo • BOLLARD (TYP) SEE DTL. 2 /SP -1 12'u8' 12 SP -2 CONC. WALK / (SEE SITE PLAN) ® // \\ DBL. Ll ® / \ PROVII i� �\ 15R4CIP z ® ON EA. / \ ` (RE: CIVIL) HOLD -BACKS CONC. APRON FOR GATE VERIFY LOCATIONS W/ GATE MFR. (SEE DTL. 5 /SP -2) 2 ' TYP. \ . i ,, TYP. SERVICE YARD PLAN 10 1 , 4 •= 1 1_ 0 0 '' 'or€. TERIOR RED QUEUEING RAIL 3 X 3 STEEL "L" ANGLES t FACE CAP FLASHING GALVANIZE BULKHEAD .1 • . «OW NI D--1 & CI JOVE CT- 4 o ;n I El OLTS (TYP.) TCHEN WALLS -i ETAL SIDING I • JBUC AREA COMPLETE W1711 ALL TRIM 3 X 3 STEEL "L" ANGLES ALLS ASTENERS AND FLASHING o : I GALVANIZE 1 (TYPICAL) :a 4 X 4 TREATED SLEEPER 1 ""'r %JJM GALV. HAT CHANNELS lit. SET STEEL FRAME IM MASTIC 1 O 3' -0" O.C. TYPICAL BEFORE BOLTING DOWN 4 X 4 TREATED SLEEPER CONT. 2 X 4 4 (TYPICAL) BUILT -UP ROOFING • CO NTINUE OVER SLEEPERS, TYPICAL • \ . 1 .4 t 1 `I� � '� � SIMPSON HURRICANE TIES Li miuma J °v f n ' -' 2 X 4 AT 24 O.C. ` I j BUILDING STRUCTURE .- U o E c : - 1, m !� v o. i. PROVIDE CANTS AND REQUIRED 2 E SIMPSON 11E STRAPS CONT. 4 X 4 00 7 is W ILI o SECTION x • N.T.S. 1- ds IP _ , r_. a�.i 76 lL • cr 'm.LWORK AND ` LWORK & 1 ` oILET PART1T10NS • • F UBUC AREA • CEILIN G C0 3-t -04 REMARKS 3 . X. 3 STEEL "L' . ANGLES _IC AREA CAP FLASHING GALVANIZE .. )RS/BATHRM.. , ` � . � i -1114 • HEN/FOOD . FLOORS 3 I i o % '� ` BOLTS (TYP.) •) PREP A WALLS 1 - ARM. WALLS: METAL SIDING . 3 X 3 STEEL "L" ANGLES F. TO 3' -10" o �► GALVANIZE ":4- I ,UC AREA . R£A GALV. HAT CHANNELS 4 SET STEEL FRAME IN MASTIC -L BASE • 0 3 O.C. TYPICAL l BEFORE BOLTING DOWN 0 X A TM SLEEPER • QT . BASE OOQ TYPICAL) : a BUILT -UP ROOFING . BASE N � � CON11NUE OVER SLEEPERS (TYPICAL) W :I i ZEMARKS r• 411. BUILDING STRUCTURE =21OR � ~ Z FRAMES w 2AGE COUNTER PROVIDE CANTS AND REQUIRED . SIMPSON TIE STRAPS : DOOR, SECTION '43 & XTERS N.T.S. T FIXT. TRIM 2IFFUSERS 0 z W. 300. n_ V 432 � ' / N' O S ,fY R 70 354 .1 46.33 79.35 110.10 110.10 110 10 32 35 48 'a ,s' �1\ 1 32 65 ° �4, , 1� 5 .89 °41'E. t N$9o10'W 146 6' �, � 8' ,6 , < % ' 124.91 .' 64 E.' ; 427 428 429 430 431 1 400 - - - 1 n I h X1195/ N 425 426 6 O N p N N - 1 � .95Ae o (� o I3 N co II -o I • _ �` 9 M 8 7 � � � I 12 4 v• - 9 0 0 0 d RO co z z N O h \ 4 025 I 25 0 � 1ti1 z `INITIAL PT. °o ��1 w, r, „ii } 8 ,30 i.,'. •�4D20" „�,;, i /iri . 3 , ., •i /a;0 % - . % /;; "!$O�Qu /� /� // i` ! /r /i %// Z'•'i / / /i;a.�s ; /.'vr�ii / / /// �U� �d1 - - EAST 3T8- - - o,,: 4490 449..9. / .., a -,, 4927 2596 ''4470 4470 '� SEE MAP 4475 45 .4 44 "B S' 'fje90 ` 5` "Z BQ 45 700 2S 1 2CC i'•� i;• - • 58 42 57 ' ST SS �', 4" - 9 / 5 89°35 42�' 4.16 N f19 °48 19 ` E "s a / / 6100 P 6 T. 00 S 6 3 89° 0 0 E 5100 5000 4900 4800 4700 460Q 4500 4400 4300 4200 4100 4000 60 Ae. m 6100 2 m 30 m 6400 1302 6 0,? 1 1 / m l 2 g 3 0 4 °' , /9Ac. m N M n ti N g 3 / _ __ _ _ 0 �, 0 .o �, v M m .o o %t 6 00 e. � ti o l r � r r � \ � N 34 - 33 _ 32 - 31 = 30 = 29 - 28 = 27 _ 26 "• 25 = 24 23 "- n° \ N 1 \ o � � 4 94AC .° / 39 57 34 &. o . =BT 4' 0 / 6 9 R.175. b 32.7• 75 22 44.70 44.70 44 4475 44.80 4485 4490 44.90 4495 4490 44.80 • 4522 ` 1 / R ■150' 75.23 TR ,.F.. --- �' TRACT .,D,. r P RIVATE S TREET O 800 ` ti � ` .a I I / VACATED r� \� \ \\ O I' X 50' O \� O O O O d M• / .00Ac, - h 0 92- 2T69�, /,152 80 - 2TT3 1 i23 n •I n \ �a Ne I 50.96 48 48.50 48. 46 49.08 \ �� 17 5 ` ° t a5,ea 1 1 1300 � 6 � 700 6500 6600 1 W 8790 321 i .9, 0: c ev ° 3400 3500 3600 3700 3800 390 �� -- / s n n BUTTE GRANGE 5200 , ,/°i m 530 ' B '= '= �Q. .51 Ac. IM a o �/ Z ;p Q R ° 18 19 ° 20 21 0 22 go o� �^ No. 148 I _ J 20' . m 1+- / N 5 Q 6 CO- % v ° - 36 8 N 89 °42 w co N y ' N 1 r r I 35 50.06 48 50 , 48.50 48 50 48 50 48.79 277' 16.6' ' �- � j� r � I�� .. 102 9 : 190.06 d N 89 56'E 770.7 3 - 1 / 6e 6S' pi +> 10710 Ri 0 f" a--•9 . , 0 . 0 0.N. «% \. 6 8 ' n.� ° 3300 90 \ °� W. 442' \ 1 o � 5 70 70 70 70 v n O • 78 A C . 2 '� s e9 °42' 69 90 70 34 31 E 5400 0 16 a ® � 184 di 60 00 5900 5800 5700 5600 5500 ° 1201 1 0 p p 1:, ';;, 37 --- -- , 711.4 2 7/ Ac 0 r 43 1 .1: 42 c 41 v 40 39 v ;38 d 3200 ss9 °sr w 364 s 20 g T\ A T D f R. �3 1000 N 3 i� 5070 O 70 O 70 0 69 90 0 70 74 04 132. P �� 15 S.W. GARDEN ! - o Dv PAr,TME�' <r OF to ,..„-iii o- o 0 0- - 6y � ` a 310 y . N � ti �"C " ASS�.SS ±r EN Tt"iX1i� -.5 70.32 20 80 100 30 100 32 R.' v ` W 20 O h - R: 2o �� 2100 2600 2700 .C ' ' 14 - m o �° 3 D - -oc 1700 r Q 2000 n ,� ��0 n d' G 100.45 y i m N �',1r� y I,, 2 m r n W 10 m I I m V m 1 .. 3 = 5 '' r 1 f� m W 3000 : ° .6. 3 r ^� '�'lT P�ii °. > cc =- a N 89 56 286 6 _ X FOR !c��StL�Sv.� �+ QI ii 0 100 O +�- ° 100 O 101 Ck-CE W 4.39CH 5 .94 ^� N 89 ° 28 ' 50 W OR'..! - DO IO0�) RELY ° 90.32 n Io 9 2200 0 � �� N TR ACT + E� 1 100 236 06 ^ Q � so a F � �z� 8 0 0 0 -w 2500 2800 '� rr ^� 1800 1900 m 6 m e` 8 9 ' t2 PARK � � 1 .65 ac. \� ^ 4 ., Q o .29 00 .° Q W rMi i� 100 30 100 101 3Q �/ ' �• o' 1200 Al N o 2 0 [} N '6' 115 O O ° 115 0 116 0 I� ° q .'r / �, ��� a , G, i - ° 3 2 2300 2400 2900 P J' .0.).. o ° h a =i4 :`�/ 8024 54 4 61 o, OA Q! 1 0 L N89°35'E 160 1 I SW COR p 35.56 1 20 - 8 O n 3i 13.12 � _ 8)444_4/528_ DEDICATED TO PUBLIC C.V. 442/433 c „r "N "56 "w" 71.51 7 1.' ° . 0. I3 k q � $ io h q - s 6so 35-9 S.:II ` 1 EORGE RICHARDSON C r 99 -0,}7}70 N 89 56 w INITIAL PT o ° �' - -� SW. 0 M cDONALD ROAD - D.L No. se PURPOSES 1 .84 • • , 115 r ..404,14 , 589 35' E 346 6 J e a' ■ C.R. No, 358` r1/ 4.27��, E - \ \ 861.93 T C.R. '' � DO NOT REL.' PUBLIC X 78' 42469 � \o 108174 FOR ANY OH - I418.0 � 140234 -_ IS b 06 39CH 1 -- _ _ Ip I I SEE MAP 'T' I G I 2S I IOAA • • 2S I N�. 1/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 10 T2S R I W W.M. 2S 1 IOAi WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE 1 "= 100 W SEE MAP SEE MAP 1 3DD as 1 3DC c3 w <•s, sr .4, X 4 . 4r 1 0•0 x, Q pM ° •� 2801 �a �3� s 3 2 334c. 9 c � — / C.R. A -14 a C.R. 430 I o ° S.W. � (234 — R• 420 = _- 159.11 T0.8� S.W. $ Mc DONALD STREET 7 0 V 01 �� 101.31 101.59 l.! - %.' ` HNW COR p r T TO Ro8LIC 1- 78 -42482 • 2e 3 2q \ 622/83 io 70' 86' �A /4Ac. g `�> 2800 1 I R_IO• `J 90• 125 / (91 12873' S .50� _ IIO � /. 3,4Ac ry r � �t� • / '.9T 9� R S 89 53' E I W 2500 N 2400 N 2300 �,p 2� os� ��� p a a 700 \ 600 ° I 500 - 290.0 II o m °'� / 45 AC. ..J 50 AC 3 1 52 AC. ., z / 1 Ltl Q rc /25 AC /BAC 36AC. 2200 / \�j' C �` .95,4C R. <a, /? .69. / .'8 , � , ° - 1 1 L1 �--, o, 10020' 2100 4/ ,� �\ / — _ _ — — 68550' , I i p 2 S89 °19'W Co w 50' `�__L. CANCELLED TA> 934C. a +-* s I M Y ..0 • 0 1 ° --� 1900, 2700, 1800 �° a� ' s i, � `� . iV / �� 03,. � �2 800 � ' 30 " 400 a' in � —' 2 202, � ; 2 000 ee Sr .. ,ss - e 4 � y �. � Q 2 9B 35 Ac. g O 3100 t—• M P /. 68A 9 I ^ i J 3 �i y / ..if. 1 12875 — �—� - `` I P �h Oe sir �A ° 90 Zes 134 79' 49 '4, Lt 1 3 / -11. � ?► 52 AC. i t h 9c' CO ‘ 300 " � ��� �«� %;.. FR � y � � 6 ' zJ 2.08 AC, r so J n, 3200 Lt C3 P r4 • as. ro - "V / 4 �w h � � 0 s P, r 3201 1 A . z • P . 1 000 , 4 J° � t ;. �w \ o` /.62 A C. s � q, 3� 0 \ y o7 W . ° P � \ . � 200 0 sr 4r, � re. /63 AC. S 88 : r 99 84' 0 ? J /J \ Nj /00, � e O, p N � qS. \ m \ `b 28 W m S 0 w rJ / S / f M 0 � ... \ 2J. Seao4,g1 0 Y 0 in O 74 2 • Zm in SEE MAP i ` / e ss ° � � ° � s � s � SEE MAP 2S 1 IOAB q > > / 1100 S s�ss. 'o ,2, � F 2 401 / /*". ; ,41 92 Ac. �� F i,oq,ac. N, ° � , s 1 116e : M '259,71 12 W w 114 � 94., , q .2. 46 b m 1, .94., NN / / O yo 3 to • • 1 " 397.12' rn 269.49 199 83 "' 242' 1114 '}4770' 42 200' ..1 , 254.49 14 00 200' / ` '''•\. 3 • 342 . 40' 20770' o� 1200 >• 1300 1400 S 89 18' W 1500 I / r te �� 4, 37A 0.. .52 AC. 5.4340] 637 AC. Q V O. I Q I / \,"..77 � °° 4s c / 1 � � / N J ��� R 1 I t 1 1-1 Y ,T_ 8 _ -1 fj - p - - - - - - - - - - o - - - --- •sZ + - - - 433 -f ^ 7 / 79.,36 110 110 110 32b4 { 5 I e � ` • ar .1'4' I p - 4i X 00 x � 1� FA t R H AV N A ~ 6„..2, 9 Vo , • 64'w1 yb , 1 ` \I , � 110 10 1 10.10 110.10 32.35 48 85 43 2 d'80 S s • - . . 6. a s•61'E.. I , I� I 429 430 „431 ,, Ms9Plo • w . 146 6 _ _ - ' ' 428 - 0 6 �r 400 r 1 ` M 11 � .95 Ac. 11 N N 10 V 9 _ ' - ��, - 8 7 y �i � ` 0 fN � � O .t ' • , `te e . 1 : iv ,:_ S „�. /. /.::. �` %� °� ././ •c, �.__,, , +} _ _ EAST 378' - - - SEE MAP k' " t.. - -, • 4.16 N 89 °48 19 "E 700 2S 1 2CiCi - 3* -...,:::_:,_„..,i, x 510 100 5000 4900 4800 4700 46001 4500 4400 4300 4200 4100 4000 6 60 A e. m m N N g o h. Q% 600 J 34 = 33 = 32 = - 31 = 30 = 29 2$ = 27 = 26 = 25 = 24 = 23 = n �� = z . ° a w e 94ac. P' re =8 . , A 44,70 4470 44 4 475 TRACT D PRIVATE STREET 4480 4 4490 44.90 4495 4490 44.80 4522 = , _ ''' � °. 800 �� �, �� yTR. ''FN �� 2 /.00 Ac. 1 X 50� p ,A 4f *e:. • 48 50 • 48 50 48 50 48.50 49 87.90 32.1C/ ,� 1 1 P 3x{00 3500 3600 3700 3800 se • E N. BUTTE GRANGE / 5200 5300 �� • �0 '= '= Y m x s m Q o R ? 18 0 19 °- _ 20 2 21 22 b h � No. 148 z 1 1 •2 36 - a a = 7 89 42 W _ • - 1 = 50.06 48.50 !in' liii , )' A ii/ ,.. 277 t02 190. • • N 89° 56' E TTQ7 a -7 " 1 p IOZ10 p \ , 80. N 3300 900 W. 442' r 'O 343 1O . AC gip p �^- ` 16 -. 5500 $ 6 ,,te 1201 1 . �. 102.93 711.4 g 2.7/ Ac 0 S89 °56 364 8 / 0 , C 3 1--' ! � 38 �' 3200 ; Q r, �� �,, 1000 y 5 .1 70 0 T4 04 32 6 - ii w /3a C. t (\ 1 ti bi ?V",/, Q`1 ,� '� x5.94 N • m �� `1 f ° )EN p 3100 N \` -�� W _ ) ` 30 -• loo 32 0;2° ►- 14 o � �? _ _ , o �• -' 2G00 2700 �G •, o r _ s . ` �� n 100.46 ri 3 ■ I ! • to r f ' Q W 3000 M 89° 56'E 286. 1 , , i 0 O Z w4.39CH. S94 f w e9 °28SOw . 100 V 60.47 r 2 500 2800 aI n TRAGT , 1100 236 , • Q 1200 i . , - a p PARK • �; ,6J Q f . w e e 4 it .29.40 _ j 8 g 12 e 01' �W 2 a t 4, ea 1200 Al o m �0 100 pl • ' II I P r^ � • N 6 • Its • 11 6 e tr J Z� - O 3 t 2400 2900 o �N119° 5'E • SW COR - n 8 I3 0 ��i r �� {3.12 ! S ?� - D N 444 28 3 �8 ° 3SiPTb.31(.� 41 ° I EOR6E RICHAROSON h arc Naafi FOR AS SE S SMENT N 56 w INITIAL 1 _ °� SW l41c DONA L,C ROAD ,, .,,,,,,,,mss.., , ,,,,,,,,,., • .�' s s9 . 35 ' E 3466 _ _ .� ',o $ R PURPOS ONLY. s61 c .R. a3 DO NOT RELY ON - \\ (6390 ` I 11 FOR AN OTHER USE. • - 1 l , (1639CH.) _ S - 1 • f ---------- • SEE MAP TGAR °D ' 2S 1 IOAA : 24 1 3DD I ' R. oo To i r H t % t1 M Y_e N -'- "' eige • / �ro 1. .• . : .32° ' .o� _ . ,, 1 . • �- g o 3 °p 46.33 7 432 � ', O ?' s. i t as . „ _ , , ,, Vi. 354 9.35 110 -10 110,10 110.10 32.35 w ' S, • S. 88°41.2. % � ' 4.91 ••-•"". 8466 427 428 4 30 ,. „ ' . Hisa °'w 14s• -- - '' ,' ' 01 III • ' �u 9s� ; , 426 • . N 6 � ,� ' 400 ,., :..,, ; • 0. 1 3 w 12 aQ 11 0 10 •o 9 - • 8 y - . • PT. t e ,' ir2Pb . - X850 �% %:' !ice /.•,i 7/ / % / �� /,, % ' /// , % / / % % o ,', • i V . [ �; : ` i. • / / /.. c• /� /,. / /.... �1' EAST 378 bT' s)• b5 4927 25 • - "„ ;i / . ' : / r.�i .. -- - - - - - - - - - v .� / . „ , . _r 49 SEE MAP PL S 89 33' E S L 42°E - 4.16 N 99 48 19 -E t 700 16200 d 6300 0 6400 1302 5100 5000 4900 4800 4700 460Q 150 4400 4300 4200 4100 4010 60 Ac 2S 1 2CC ! 2 5 3 Si 4 /9Ac• o N fe = N g j ( 1 r' �`` - _ • 34 33 32 31 I ;n o 25 24 111 o � 60 I\ 1.71 fJ' 1 30 _ 29 1 28 27 26 p N a` o _ e o Q "..tie- o 5 34 3 i t> :'� / r ems= X63 2' y ' R.I7.• 2.7 75 22 44.70 • 4430 44 44.75 4480 44.85 4493 44.90 44.95 44.90 44.80 4522 ■ � � \ b ;e . -s, N.150 75.23 TR. "F. ---4. . TRACT " o ° •, . r ` `"` O p \-� PRIVATE STREET �J 800 b y - - $ , . -r 60 -2 7731 p 1 % 50 ° /.00 IS 2 2 �\ 6 0 41 p , S r,. ,• .. } 48.60 4850 48.50 48.50 4908 ID • 6700 4 5.83 , 65 87.90 1 • q �'+�' 3400 3 x00 3600 3700 3800 �C ` � � . o4Ac. 6500 6600 5200 5300 ,,� (, ti • <. < ry mo ° p N B ?J �, f4 o �uM? Q' t3UTTE GRANGE . 4 Di 5 6 o _ 8 Q & 17 g 18 s 19 2 20 - 21 2 22 g,2; t Na 148 ;: i ,- • es NO- � _ 35 3 6 (3 T .°6 48 ' 4,...e. f r? ye„ � ;r -.J + : • F? I 35 edi Q 43 2 w T � r� l ' 102 79 890.0 i i uisi l i i. _ - _ . ;l ; ` p - ` - 50.30 i� e. /ll192ii � Q m. 277' _ _ +. si.: s>� a _ . -.._ 's'- 65' 65' 0 . 10x10 -I,: NAP 66 = E 7TQ7 Al.) i;�� � / T 3300 t '.} t,•: 4 • r.� . i y 900 w 442' _ -/� y. ' y - 70 70 S 89' 42' E • O 3431 $ a .! - r, _� , 5900 g 16 $' .i8 Ac ea �� • c a =�: -' t f': 5300 5700 5600 5500 0. •.T 1201 i _ . �' 4 t y � ' o $ 0 10253 • Y } " S • `j+ 3° g•-• 2 - _ 711.4 2.7/ Ac ° ' -1.1:Y. r ` . ' - , :.:_ 42 41 40 39 38 �, .7 Ss9 °56'W 364 8 1 - - s - '' . . �- r , ,� 3200 ' ° - - a f X 11'\ /� r� '. R -Jr :fi ;,t I - i � � • *� s ti; TO 70 6990 TO 7404 P ' , 5 p 1- •f,`/t • u •4 b A, �_/ PPP `� - • .. Y�" " R ' ;� N 105.94 W ,~ +( -r r "11- - .A x. i` S.W GARDEN •' ::•� r `s p s 3100 a o t `t _'' ��'. -: s � ' 1 0 - O ' 1 3 It. t N r O t I � n 1-;" 1 " e4F -t ;s* ' Ao 1o0 30 1 00 32 f020 o ' W WASI�II \GTO : tj , s t 4. �� 2100 i 2600 2700 t� • , ° ° _ . t DEFAR ,1 -1,.:..s .� , ,; i • t � , it • P 0 N •0 g n • x °� 100.46 •r ' , o t- ASSESS,. `t�� , = T a► l� M , ` 5 • '' 3 = r , r� r� l ° • `- : ' : -A > � z ' •w � • 100 m � 3000 M 69 56'E ts6.6 ` - �:` � 'a y 1 . � j r 'rd ! < • 4 � 0 • 0 • z t t 100 101 � w4 . 3 9CH. !94 r N89 ° 28 SO � . A,r�+ � `� % 4 ° c� ` t ' s r f �� # • y N 0 2200 m 2500 2800 af t 6 TRAc'E 1100 13606 V 80.47 ►.' =: r,•' : t ':Fi •{ = v .. ` � ? �o 90 i I 5fi • � . � 1200 = O RASSESST,11 r '` • ; ` m $ p PARK 6S AC ' • : 1900 6 12 0 A. , 4, .29Ac. Y .. ., pi t * _ r .. .. M 8 100 30 100 a , N • ` �' r' � �, A, 0 •1,z. t e " 3 .. , 3 � x 1 o • o-o-o 0 '°' - - • r ' ° 1200 AI N o ; ,. a,,,, W- - 4.- : - : 1 ' " p 4 a MS 115 lib - ' FS f 1 F � C, w - • _ s+ • � ,r .s "' :N '> ' y ,'�f ' �. [ - :;.1.::':-..:,=-•. �+,: - 3 2300 2400 2900 °', r e J ? z• _ � , 3 ' �_ .. . , Y . :A - 1. - 1 ,.. * � Y +`� x 24 54.4.1„ z p O o 1 0 ) , t of • L B N69° 5E ' ?+. H ~ 1 . ""1-.-/'''.1-' � �� r 3 t y a 6 1 5 6 R• 7 _ g 8 . r 13 fj 13.12 y • ni i L - 0!/ 44 2A ° 3 31 .di .+ r. as ti , T �: EO RtE tt1� , w ON . ' is T y r� cc -oln 41 y ' N A9° 56 W INITIAL PT. •' • 1 y 1 $ w • • 1 C -_1V�� 43 r. .�944. riii u./ //44..:u ,i.ui.4, ,, iig04,14 . P ., 3A9 °3s' 3446.6 . 7 7 _ ..- ..!p: .�' 1,.•16. M1c DONA � D ROAD ~ •>'�.. .'Q.L.6,NQH Al w i "� ice" � t Pia 356 4 7 <•' i�` 661 93 C.R. 430 ' � -7.- ` / ` C � ; E z.. "POD a`i 3 1 6 °2>/•Od'E f i •• C zwt� DO:. Rs i ? t i j � ' - �t j 4 3 f 9 1061 T4 . -.4. < .� r . t I�Rx a l lli? t R•{ 1402 31 t b U6.39CH) - •'_ "-*-� 10 - l 1 Y �' { f - • • . ' at4, j' ,i ys "....;:t..1/4.:- � . ,•,; -,• - _ - • 1 .4• ! -,.`„:.;.,---•:.•:: it • • 625/ �j :t `ESL • "' 1 ' `" Wi - -_-....,:-,,-,.,S'..1" •1'a_ � 1 ? : 3 . / E 2 • .�� - 1 ° �'° ? . ,( 4 _ � •10 . - :l a ii, • ,_ , t "-- ." 1..'f' r T fx+4a w ,• + _ - t ' � • " yr a µ L _ -. .. ..-.z s,_v- .s.a -m serp.c..Fr ,.,'.2e -'-<. t.4s. N -.r +. _.w. ._ ha!F -- . ','F,P_.^.T'T -•_ --•. T -.- ..+. -T .. _ _.- -.+--- -•- s-..-_---.... - -_ _ _ -..... .___ __ .. �.. __ _ -- _.. _____ _ -_ _._ _ .____ __ ._._ NE 1/4 NE 1/4 SECTION 10 T2S R I W W.M. it 2S 1 1044 WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I"= 1100' SEE MAP MAP • t j 2S 1 3DD • 3oC ai �? w •� s ' * �Sr4j�,, 3 j 2 a , ° .M 2801 '33s x 23 , '4s lL 33Ac. S R c s / c R A -M7 a C.R 430 ' +4' 2 _ 6.1d _ _ w� - 123401 0 8 .42 , 21 16 ' T 159.11 70.a S.W. $ Mc DONALD Dom 22/63 R STREET -:- S. / . � 8 A 101.31 101.59 4. T TO PtleLlc T 78-42482 '9/11 2640 .251.1?" 2 8 • R.I. ` e O " 125' - (901 ' 128.73 s zT� 1� �'� 4 ry \- 11 3 86' / .T. 2.49 d i 5 8 9 53' E 1 2 90 p � /. 34Ac u r n , ��, / 97 9 2 i 700 600 ° 1 500 ° � !7 1=0 2400 2300 ` e4 �2 . '6'to ro .- ^ a � / .45 AC. a .5O AC. 3 1 .52 AC. w z $ .Ltl N " 22 00 °� � ° .18 AZ: ` . 364C � ` °- 1 r W 95 AC. SC R 3 /s, / /� ��. / ^ ' v X t > / -, 86' • S 8 J • 1 4:b� o ° " Q 30� +j 685 50 N r _ __ -- W ' SO' 1-�_l 0 a 100 20' 2100 - / - • / / _ - - ? - - - S 69 J9' IM ' _ CANCELLED TAX LOTS N .93 AC. ti .3 h - s s s° 1 o o --....„,2 100, 2700.1800,100,201, 202, e a t / � i 0 .1 800 / sly '� F 1 400 z d in •-•":=, 2000 s ,s es es i 0,.,_ -D. - ., Q • 2 as .35 35 AC. 1 l .O2 Ac Q O 3100 / 3 t s. L a `. /. 6 8A c. e • a ' 3 � s 3 �i';r - /� . °900 � 134.79 ,� s F> c 52 AC 0 `a 300 Lt1, �� -al • h i R 3z � � 2 2 .08 AC i- ( • • ° '° 3200 1- • y �ry� > � T f ® �, ! P� a * 3201 4 �J S 4 � O • 1 3 83 145 1N L!'P� 4 `' 7� 1000 e ., _ - o` / 1.62 AC. roN '�' \ .te / m 4 , 200 `mo h� vv .:P /.63 AC. N QT 'Oti "' '� s two 51' W 0 : ?S• /S° 9384' ..6 43" / 6 N 63c 4 ° n i . N. ` 2 B? a i0 S 4 O /s m t SS \\ f " ,.s S / ? S o4.4 t e b ° 2g" N. 2. z F 1 = f _ / 2 z o n iN Q . z in hi 'Y 2, .6 `s 41111 74 o / 3 ° ....4, SEE MAP 9 1 MAP /s �,o 3 / 2 � 0 '� N 401 s • 66-0-se 1 2' f 2S 1 I IBB i 1 IOAB / / ` y �`` 82AC. " f _ 1.04 Ac. N 94s , ,2. w m N 4 i' 4 ° . m 9 3 , S4 ■ %\ / / g• �/ rn h /� Q ^� `O I in 242 - ` `A 39712' / c 269.49 199 83 1 42' 200' 770' \ \\ _ t it t .4 V `\ Ir` ? t 254 49 207.70' 14 200 2 / t 1 .� 1200 � 3 ' s 1300 342.40' 1400 $ 89° l8' W 1500 a /�� �� 37A C. 52 AC. 5.¢JAC.) 1 6.37 AC. 0 f / / A /\_ 1° ` - 4 r -- c ,-\/ 4- „IN r r r R .B 1 U R Y 1 LEARNING TREE I (VERIFY) / 1 DAY SCHOOL i f• - c Xi., LIGHT TYP. L — — _ — ` ■ POLE (RE ELECT.) O ANGLE e a I 1 4 n- x �- k I X — — — w — — — — — .� — -- I\ l LAN...) AP-. I I , u , _ S 8Qd 56 00 W 366 25 (364 50') a L.AV SCAPE — -- I Nill" I 5 , I n , P ,° I 1 1 Ex!s�T'6 LIGHT - -- e TRASH I Ilk . 1 1 POLE (RE- ELECT) 40 P / /- • L' e CLEAR VISION ZONE , t `; , ' � a `- I I. � , q (BOTrI SIDES OF DRIVE) /9 j `t T `' 4- P. "DO NOT ENTER' a i SIGN /�I' LANDSCAPING 3VP =RING. e S V AL: (5 4O c 8 SPAC'E'S - 2 -C. = 0 2 30 -3" - — — ry - - - — CO P /• - - + , RIM R.� BELOI^l) h ) i , ,, IA A , an Q13 it, t. 0;'' 8 ,, a ch p , 3 0 ,,,, t,..„, , Airmah.,;. : „,:. . ,,,, 4! BAt d -- r -- � ' • sue i ( in A) ` , , ' E %, 1 - D Ts �N L.P. '1--"r.., . Z �.I 'KEEP RIGAT" v T • '' _ 11 b , SIGN ; > < a ; h a ' BICYCLE RAG , ' � • 4 0 I � n 41ko'`. e ' 18' b' '2' G' -3i' � . 0 15 mi a i S� " �4 • 0/ >. < : ' X 1 0 = BO STO N MARKET • N �� S.F. I " " 4� / Lto 5 . RIFY L• / / PYLON GN - ?5�f EA. SIDE >>:<< I N T ' ' (5c'E - LON SI Gt�AGE SHT) ? 0 _ F.F.E. = 274.00 • 1 �S / 1J BOA' F , -,/ � LINE OF " XISTINGI S" - REMOVE • - - © ,� ,. CURBS THIS A.� AND INSTALL N ?IFY) 1 t �� 4f ' / d LANE APIN E.GIVL E LAND 1 It'll:11M. 'L---- ' ' - J - � EXISTIN "TIGAR TORS" SIGN TO BE R . _ i __ .41raljr„. .1- ,-., © �'' ' , EXISTING = 1DEWAL!yRIFY) TO REMAIN ___..... ' DBL S TRIPE - - - - - R ' s o ¢ = < < ^e ® , /// DRIVE -THRU 12 GONG TY, ��y Q z ` 4 ,' "EXISTING EN GE" TQ�E REMOVED "DO NOT ENTER" P. APRGN (NO COLOR) 0 �_`� stv, �i i ' GONG. TAIRS // SIGN �` �� G9 g ' - • ING (SEE/FTL. 2 /SP -I ) S, 4' � te a,` � a' LP �' // -; \ \ . e' CON• STAI s / - 26 I. ING E SID- • l ; // SPIRAL CURVE-. 3/S -I) ° If) /A ' SEGMENT OF C L /' SOUTHERLY, IN L AVSCA�i wore - ,' j / / A ' 0 ,' P S , 5 = Olai= ONLY N bad 56' 00" E 243.12' (286 60' I. , _AVSCA� _ A — - AVSCA i IRAN FORM e � , % ` 250 00 LONG - EX S V LANDSGA°` N, CJ -+ I � I EXIST'G LIGHT n (RE LEGT / / /./ / CONCAVE 1' q -PA/NC-UT AND REMOVE I • .. r -1- POLE (RE ELECT,) I ,' / / / /,' T'rfls AREA �� l ' ' • • r I �� 1 N - .��- //, , -,' f 6 SPACES = 62 -5" I Ib -5" 4 SPACE'S = a _ a : ,■ ' , // //' - 7. ENCLOSURE - GONSTRZT 1 EX'ST.NG TRASH ENCLOSURE TO 13 , > / //' i' -'E SAME AS EXISTING (V - R1FY rim ALL - - I I :.E'- `OLISHED AND RE- LOCATED / / // �' VIL, LANDSCAPE, AND `'Z Y Z3➢`irEg? CONTRACTOR TO BE RESFONSIBLEI / • / //' Q �.' :.:' E GT LOG TiON PRIOR T MOVING • I I FOR. ALL PATG -LING AND CURB /SID�WAL< - J / //. �/�► , • = E STIN R G TASn E NGLOSJQE) t 1 I I -5._ GN' - =N/ e-4. NiEYN CONS P..1 '� I j G -IO • 0 • N I c ... 0 werv loovo vt ," 9 . 4 v , q efromAn W471 NIT? far les-OW a41.4"01 j,w44O VA/104°1 (/ • -------_ • Lc:? '9( t,, ivmvCini - Awl OC ( 'J • e_•••-• 41^ • • • • • . . • • • • J • 1 • 44. • A . • ' 1 114 - 3/4 -° - • r v g F GENERAL NOTES I. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS 0 SIDEWALKS AS SHOWN OR AT . 5' -0" O,G. (T(P.) EXPANSION JOINTS 0 2O'-O" O.G. (TYP) , 2. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ALL IRRIGATION, PLANTING EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS AND ______ _____ . _ .._ .„ .. __ _,___:__:_ . : IONS PRIOR TO ANY WORK. ' SPACES = b2' -5" ';9 '' 5 SPACE' PAGE5 - 52' -1" 16' -2" 6 SPACES = 62' -5" • 3O' 24' ' ♦ ♦ • 3. REFER TO ALL CIVIL PLANS FOR GRADE LOCATIONS ♦ ♦ LEARNIN TREE AND COORDINATE THEM NTH ALL LANDSCAPING, PYLON/ VERIFY) MONUMENT SIGNS AND CATCH BASINS. DAY SCHOOL _ - r- EXI5TG LIG HT - • 4. ALL STAGING AREAS TO BE COORDINATED , A / CONTRACTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION MA z ' WITH THE WOOD FENG L. — -- — P OLE (RJ= =ELEGY) > NANGER (TO REMAIN' A. ° ' • _ ' , TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. I ENGROAGHEMENT -. x _ _ _ •1 L / :. N.W. P. PRIOR _ - • BOSTON CHICKEN KEN rr( R BO )- — FOR ' ' �� x / _ _ - 4 5. CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING - 1 . - 1 ----,. - - . 5 84101 56' 00" W 366.2 (36 4.80) • • - ❑ `9 _ LANDSCAPE / r f ' ALL EXISTING 516N5, MAILBOXES, FENCES, LANDSCAPING, EGT.. - _ x i_ANDS ar A N EXISTG LIGHT C /. r r ,, � , x , ; TO AVOID DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. _ . \--- — S . * Q' • / ' rf 6. NEITHER OWNER NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL ENFORCE SAFETY I LANDSCAPE POLE (RE :ELEGT� `_ MEASURES OR REGULATIONS . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN , -TRASH ' / , �' � //' , /i' TS INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES AND SHALL BE O SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE L.P. n AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS EXISTING O� it CLEAR VISION ZONE 1 r ' '� '' . i / / 4 r AND REGULATIONS. 1 x "DRIVE -THRU" 4 ❑ 4 Y �`` a� a� h (BOTH SIDES OF DRIVE) # > ,t " � / • SIGN ry a. Q-' � E XI�TiNG FFGE VERd1�Y W/ OWNER — Q-a `�' a 8 . 4 CIC 1. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL �' SIGN N OT ENTER / m a •' FOf DEM TIO JURISDICTIONAL. BUILDING CODES AND 1 _ g , . REGULATIONS. i 1 LANDSCAPING BUFFERING + - - _ - - > / h / / INN• STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL. _ / - ,r ,f EXISTIN TRI ET/g T, �IGN / 111 'd' _ 8 SPACES - 2 H,G. - 92' 5" n \ ./ -- - / TO RE AIN F Y) ' - ME 8. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSIONS AND r 1 ®SCREEN Y`IALL (SEE NOTE THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOBSITE PRIOR TO O to , =i ...,... R g , BELoY� / MINI N '� 1 / 1� > ♦ '/ ' = CONDITIONS ON / . ' 9' �' x . ill ._ ° "(1/?, , q ,, , e O .. ____ / / iF EXECUTION OF ANY WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT 4" �++ �� �- 6 4 , u , ' ¢, �% ' - , < / 14p,, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE x / - _ OF ANY DISCREPANCY. CONTRA 1 0 CC :: E: ' / i / '' ' ' : / , CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSIONS AND _ J N / R : � ��Np �' °, CC • STOP ® Ni • . ;/ / // 4 ! /o' /, �' G a_ CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOB5ITE PRIOR TO , EXECUTION OF ANY WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT WOOD FENCE Q ,+ A da _ — v 'F • • ` ' ' '' ' ' OF ANT DISCREPANCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE (TO REMAIAt) I .� 1 R - • . ��� �`,, ' ' � '' ` / ' / Q ®° a ' °' tt — ty �Y KEEP ,41GEi /i i D DUE TO HIS FAI LURE TO DO S O. A -- N R ALL COSTS INCURRED - , .fl L.P , v i� / I " LANDSCAPING ON THE SITE PRIOR x / • � ,- BICYCLE RAG 0 U CLEARANCE < N . ► /' / �� % ��' ' / � _ !O. VERIFY ALL EXISTING L I �„/ TO ANY GRADING TO BE DONE. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE BAR (RE:I /SP - )�( f (RE:6 /5P -2) 0 > V /// O Q PLANTINGS AND VERIFICATION ) oc `� ry ° / ' /' i / /�� / ' a' OF KEEPING ANY EXISTING rrt PLANS FOR ALL NEW LAN 4 - • • • TREES SHRUBS OR FLOWERS. 1 L.P ) tb8' 14 -7" 18' 20'- / ' / 4 � // / /,i ' -- O' -�" 18' 6' 12' • 14' -3}' S• 0 15' K. ♦ i / i ,/ / II. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LENGTH ON ELECTRICAL PO1 I ♦ ,•_, f 11 ♦ ): � _ MAR ; . i ' ' ' �%' / //� / ' -....... I-21-ci5 Revis(ons AT BIO- 5WALE5 AND SLOPED LANDSCAPE AREAS (VERIFY) Q ' ).( 'V � / •. TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DOG`S FOR ADDL. INFO. I I )�� O O "5 O P -0NLY" /, // ry /% / / / ; • REFER x I � ±- F > d: • � 1��: ,� •, • . : ((/� • / — 1 FY ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF MENU BOARD, PREVIEW I Q > • v RI FY L PYLON ON �5 .. EA. SIDE 12. VERIFY { { a ' ` � t ` /$ ° /� (SEE LON 516 GE SHY.) BOARDS, ILLUMINATED DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND DRIVE -THRU ` U > o Z �• •E 274• "O , j / • SIGNS PRIOR TO RUNNING ANY SLEEVES OR CONDUITS. VERIFY EXISTING 1 g , 9 . ` , - r Nov ' , , ' , / _ HOUSE L/ / • j" LINE OF* " XISTING 5 " REMOVE ALL • WITH A BOSTON CHICKEN REP. FOR ALL THESE LOCATIONS j MEW BOA { VERIFY) � t� /� e r% /' CURBS TH A AN D INSTA N EW CURB 13, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING ANY WOOD 1 / 4 LAN SOAPING ( :CIVIL 3 LANDSCAPE PLAN) FILL INTO THE SITE 4" FROM THE DESIGNATED FINISH GRADE FEND 1 I 1 ��8 - • p• • AT ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. (RE: CIVIL 1 -- -- " - V it . • ... EXISTIN "T TORS" SIGN 70 BE REMOVED . ROUND TOP S 1 / / 1 B OLLARDS D TO t t Qr� z' [ � _ (o�� mot I �'�, ® / EXISTING %IDEY'tAt_15/ // RIFY) TO REMAIN , BE PA • ... / _ 1 TRAFFIC YELLOW _ �" + ` — - - " �' .�.... s �' r • 1 DBL. STRIPE r- = 8 928` , /// ., " EXISTING • ENGE" T , 13 E REMOVED 6" DIA. STL. PIPE -FILL 22' ENGROACHEMENT -1 • + DRIVE -THRU t ,_ , 9' ®' / / Architect Seal W/ NON - SHRINK / I " 12x20 GO NGS O I > . , G ROUT d ROUND TOP I a 1 DO NOT ENTER �' + APRON (NO GoLORl Rs2�„ #0 ,, GONG. TAIRS // _ f , SIGN 4 1 ' v P �- '3� p _ . ° , 1 NG (SEFpTL. 2 /�a(� I) , � � �d`, Q-`ry �8 ' : 4' a L.P. q rg / // GON 5TA1- S "# r / / NT r PAVEME + 5P1 L URVE DA TA: 26 RA G SURFACE MATCH ALL f STING CURBS I ♦ ♦ I NG q � - _ 1- _ r ' ' RE:CIVIL :3/5 -U IN RADIUS _ I ' /SOT DFT 00142 +30L ` � / / 1 4 , _ _ 4 , / ,' ' ' • ` °/ P.S., S = Y, IN , A - 0.40;, OVE 51RAL L ENGTH - -4 A (RE:GIYIL FO? SLOPES) LAt�scAPe' LAxDSCAP>= ' ,.� { " 250.00' LONG CHORD SEGMENT = N 330136'041" E 158 .414' ``' i , ....... WON. ■■•■■••,11 VINO. ONLY N 84101 56 oo E 20.I2' (286.6�C ' -- Lar�SCA>: _.. _ _ - �Y - - . - O - O. O \ EXIS T! G LANDSCAPE M.1C.) '_ ' ) EXISeG LIGHT / (SE:p EGT. / //' - CONCAVE WESTERLY. •a '§ . O o �pO oo Oo , moo • 0.0 0.O o O o / .00 p0O o o e - • - - , ' O 00 . 00 0O 1 -- x- ^ y �1 r ' [� r f (flQE:ELEGT / i / i r r • - • SAWUJT AND REMOVE / / // r ' 0 y — � p ; p ` i x �� � / ¢ TH15 AREA -- — / , / / / i ' — , � 1 > _ x ' - " 6 C - ' -5" :.4 6 —5 " �° Q SPACES = 11431-18 A / i / / � i �� % r al \,l Y �,C Y a! �L COM PACTED GRAN / .. T 1 ♦ - , / r " H ' Lt ::::::ci � / / RE- LOCATED 5H ENCLOSU - CONSSPA 62 - 1571NG Tt! A55H ENCL T B /// U • e FILL (SEE GIYIL) 1 1 1 �� i THE S A EXISTING VE WITH A LL 1674-. DENIOLISHE )AND RE LO CATE D / //i i / _ ,. 0 4 '' " i GIYIL LADt AND PROPERTY OWNER GONTRAGTQR, 74 BE RESPONSIBLL� . ,/ /// / t w ; � 18 GONG. FTC. . , , c ,,}} EXISTING / FOR r .i. LOCATION PRIOR TO MOVING 1 FOR ALL POCHING AND CURS /SIDOWALK ° > / / /�' / / z -- I I I�' ;I SIGNAGE ' OF E ING TRA i ENCLOSURE) 1 ALIGNMENT 001T1-1 NEW CONSTRUCT! N // / / //' ® ,' ; � ' E" Q _ a .,. lob 1 �i TO REMAI I ltit i ONLY. VERIFw W/ OWNE P RIOR T� / / r / /, / / i '-� ' . - (L ;' ,, ' `° W z A ' 1 .. \If / / 1 ANY WORK ENE) (-' / / , / / _ k .. `� Q A ,i . � NOT: ` ' � . L a ' _ . ,LL., NO 1 NORK OR aTA LNG "‘t0 ms�ss, D01 IN THIS AREA OF ' F __ m • O ER5 PARKIN L T ON.THE�DAY� OF APRIL 3 -16 I1 4) i Z 0 •';1 1 / / / . W' , f I... / _ . • - - - - - - - / -- • --� . MA RKS fP1 AGE / / , / / I' -6" / - EXISTING PARKIN L9 15 - 'e0 BE RE- SEALED AND e `� `� z A / FINIS 0,L C •• e / / ! / / ® / ' W / / RESTRIPP�ED� TO 11 Of�IGIN�L STRIPPING P ATTERN. 1 ' _ /� /� ' ' REFER O G �IV I L A tD G AO - ENGINNERS REPORT fOi- - / 1 -- --- , TYF'. BOLLARD D ETA I L.. / ANY O• D ER A+pD,�r�oNAL k WORK I N THESE AREAS. • ' -/ r x / / , , _ 1 1" 1 MAPLE / ' eve/ / a / (i) 3/4" = V V NOTE: VERIFY LOCATION 1 gr'GHT L ANE / OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES / ' ) V • PRODUG13 MUST 7URh! RIGHT" ' ' -f 11:::;4.1=x, 4 , 61 !n PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 2''.) ' / i =9 8 ' ; > 1 / / - - - - -- - -- . i T- tr O 1 / �------ / � 1 ' ' 0 (L.P.) PROVIDING NEW LIGHT POLES / / 15TING PAINT . ..� - - r ` �/ , , / ,' ,, _ ,:(')_! ' 4 T RIPPING - - -- - -- - ' ' / ' ' / / ' > > • EXISTING (~ • WALL "CUSTOMER---- �, lAPP-1��' - EXIaTING ENTRANCE AND 51DWALKS TO B% 1 1 ' / > / ' �) ' PARKING '� RE- CONTRUGTED (RE GIYIL DOCUMENTS) p 1 6 ". r r i r , up' ja ,' No THRU ALL 51G NAGE TO BE RE- LOCATED <� ' ' > / , A SITE DATA �;,; ; ' _ ; , 1'''1 / ,] , :1 III *, `�. TRAFFIC � t r H�J51 T , • e A. , , , 11 . • 111111111111111ii 5' �1 ilk* '� < 1 BOUQUETS / / , , - '� �I, � t ' � ' FLORIST -� 'I'' % ' �� ' •, _ _ - - -- 5' -O (V1 =KIEV) SITE AREA 56 S.F. , ; - i WIRE MESH - • - S r � : � e .. . • �;��� ~ , i , 1 • ° -- I - -- 6 .. 6' BUILDING AREA • 5,173 S.F. �,; o ,.., Ike SGREENING � E 5l ' ®�� ' ' � 1 � ' 1 ° 1 : ♦ s -- 2 " D I A STD PIPE RAIL — ' .- °�-- ' \ MI + \ 6 GONG. WALK OVER �"� , } • • HANDRAILS 3 BOTTO Illll '� A • , • • • - e 6" GRANULAR COMP. FILL � ,' 1 ^: ;�� • e �. / 1 - B SPACES • ,� a • •. • • ' � e ¢ / WMDIMU BROOM FINISH PARK G RE QUIRED t /20o S.F.) LDG 26 PA N ,; �� RAILS. WELD ALL R /E " r ��� JOINTS, GRIND SMOOTH CHRISTIAN / / ♦ 12 • (TYP) 11 z. ♦ ���� PRIMED PAINTED MARKETPLACE" r ��� (VERIFY COLOR W OWNED !T BE R E- L OCATED) x i NID 5/8° IR WITN A A r : :: •••.--. � � � � � �i i / , : r. M " < • PARK'G PROVIDED : 45 SPACES . . ♦ +. ♦♦♦ _ i YPc IN"A MO ENT ••• Dote / + - - - / B MARKED 05 ND / �i'��i'��i�i� `` f ~- =---- - - = HANDICAPPED PROVIDED : 2 SPACES • 16820 1 .� �i _ � E.J. * i _ 1 ° ? - _ = - _ " T OT A L PARKING PROVIDED 47 SPACES crown E3y , - -, � ' t �. i - . - "-- — _ __ — 1 / A PROVIDE TOOL JOINT • . . .,., ���� '� , ,' , / �. GROOVER/JOINTER GFieGkd" E 3 y . . HEAVY �� pp i /' e f" MIN. DEPTH OR ALT. _ . BROOM I �A A 1-7 D E AVE. / / < 3 .. APPR OVED METHOD. PART NG RATIO • FIN! f/� "RADIUS TY P. i -_ ___ _____ __ �___ _ , • - ` _ - 9.08 SPAC / 1 S.E. �� NOTE:. - - - - - -- f r' PR OVIDE EXPANSION SI COVERAGE 915 % I By GALV. STEEL SLEEVE LA D SG APING @ SCREEN. WALL SHALL BE ONE OF WELD PIPE RAIL - + o PAIN TH� FOLLOWING APPROVES BY THE CITY OF TIGARD J ON EACH SIDE LAN DSCAPE COVERAGE TO SLEEVE / OF WALK AND MIDPOINT (19,J`'SO S.F.) 34.61 : -' - ' W/ RUST PROHIBITING F 1 v . GRA (VERIFY W/ 81 FOR PLANT INSTALLATION) ' } - • L ENGTH • OF WALK ""-' . • LANDSCAPE BICYCLE R PRK SPACES) , REO'D 5GO {� �- ,� - _ : (SEE DTL.1 /SP -2) - i `i (1/15 " ; GROOVED NON -SLIP 1 A ` EM ARBORVITAE , _. j A SHOWN NOSING ,:5'-on O.G.' - s , $ Job Na: " 6 ' -8" TALL AND- 3' -4" WIDE B4 B (APPR OI/1TD "STAMPED G," METHOD GAIN BE U SED 0 • Q 11" b r ` xi - ' B ,JUNIPER (WI BLUE . OR GRAY GLaAN) . , -' ';; = `':_' } - -`_ /° " IN LIEU OF GONTROL/EXPAN51ON JOINT DTI. ) "� ` `+ '�' C� L " 3 ry ,, , 0 TYP. RAILING AT CONCRETE =_STAIR ,5 -o O.G. y TYP CONC _W ALK SITE PLAN .. , v 6' -8" TALL AND 3' -4'� iNIDE - BBB �, 4, _ _ 5h No. ,► _ ILO"' THIS ,� _ , : $: 3 / 8"= I' O" ( TH I S D ETAIL 15 TO SE U SED AT ALL 1 " = 2 0' ° ' ` t � - DETAIL IS USED WHEN (2) OR MORE STAIR RISERS ARE (t) + ' 2 _ ` _ PE1�ESTRlAN WALKWAY CONNECTIONS) i ` ' t NEGGE55ARY TO AGGOMODATE GRADE CHANGE INTO SITE. ' • \Jj • t , 1 ., v n r t V - — , e' n' y - - — - - -- -. - __: GENERAL NOTES 1. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS ® SIDEWALKS AS SHOWN OR AT 5'-O" O.G. (TYP) EXPANSION JOINTS ® 2O' -O" O.G. (TYP) 2. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ALL IRRIGATION, PLANTING AND EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ANY WORK. 6 SPACES = 62' - 5" k- 5 SPACES = 52' - 1" 16' - 2" 6 SPACES = 62' - 5" S. REFER TO ALL CIVIL PLANS FOR GRADE LOCATIONS • 50' , 24' • L EARNING TREE AND COORDINATE THEM WITH ALL LANDSCAPING, PYLON/ (VERIFY) ° D 1 AY S CHOOL MONUMENT SIGNS AND CATCH BASINS. I EXIST LIGHT 4. ALL STAGING AREAS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE WOOD FENCE L _ - - _ _ POLE (RE: ELECT) e CONTRACTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION MANANGER (TO REMAIN) e I.'i' ENCiRDACiFiEMENT ° —a- _ � •� ♦' / FOR BOSTON CHICKEN N.W. ,L.P. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. _ _ 1 __ __ — — — — — _ — — — — — — \ / • 5. CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING -' 1.-- -• x- X 5 89d I � 56' 00" W 366.25' (364.80') ❑ LAN DSCAPE O // � ZO • ' ALL EXISTING SIGNS, MAILBOXES, FENCES, LANDSCAPING, EGT.. J - • , EX15TG LIGHT / / /i TO AVOID DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. N " ■� LANDSCAPE � � � POLE RE:ELEGT / � ° / , / 1 ' ri b. NEITHER OWNER NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL ENFORCE SAFETY it 1 LANDSCAPE ( ) MEASURES OR REGULATIONS . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN , I TRASH / ,' � % INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES AND SHALL BE O A A © w SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE L.P n } 8j • / / f �' / W / r f AND FEDERAL. // 0 SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS EXISTING ❑ CLEAR V4510N ZONE `Q� / f 4 / L p `� P <3 (BOTH SIDES OF DRIVE) „ " AND REGULATIONS. HOUSE ^ DRIVE -T HRU p p� +�, _ ��, �;, ry� E XIS TING F GE (V ER6I L Y W/ OWNER Q • 7. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL r FOt� DEMO TI ON) � ' "DO NOT ENTER" / / 4 � � 1 STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL BUILDING CODES AND u1 f � \ \ •- - / / mm t - d�I - ♦ Pi — ` f - - _µ._ } �� / ' 5. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSIONS AND r ,EXISTIN �TRI ET,� IGN /r 6 REGULATIONS. d- 3I' -5" 1 SPACES - 2 H G. = 102' - 9 ° \ ( � , / TO R E AI Y) / _ - I ,0 E jv CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOSSITE PRIOR TO ��/$' • ,4 m q , ' NVA . b �0 n �� \ N � / �, ,� / ■ EXECUTION OF ANY WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT SZ OF ANY DISCREPANCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE , / CLEARANCE _ ! � �' " 9 s / `' BAR (R I/5P - i n \ h �O. = / � �`` ,� / / URE TO DO S O. 0 / O , At , / " � r Q Z Z FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED DUE TO HIS FA L _ 01111111111111 ws / , , / 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL 51TE DIMENSIONS AND _ .J ( R • 4 g. �l p a `�o, p Q� ' 1 - STOP �I �' / / / / ,i f / EXECUTION OF ANY ( Q CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOBSiTE PRIOR TO A tLL1llJJJ WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHI TECT WOOD FENCE ( I fly �` - _ / _ • ' V v - '� • - ? 0 / / ' ' / / / Z U J OF ANT DISCREPANCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE (TO REMAIN) I j 1 Rs _ _ ®� o n _ �- - \, �� ,5 E RI //� / FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED DUE TO HIS FAILURE TO DO 50. / `• " _ _ _ L.P SIGN v W VERIFY ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING ON THE SITE PRIOR 1 • • - U C C I 10. x R BICYCLE RAG / �� U )' / /,, TO ANY GRAING TD BE DONE. REFER TO THE LANDCAP _ PLANS FOR ALL NW PLANTINS AND VRIFATION 1 ❑ ► • ' Q ° ° / / / i .1 y � / /i'' / i CO CI_ U) r 8' -6" " I + . / �/ � // // / / OF KEEPING ANY EXISTING TREES, SHRUBS OR FLOWERS. 1 , L.P. [// :10 i4 't • i8 20 - • N / / 4 ' " / / -- O' -�" t 12' 14' -3 5' �, / / ♦ ,t.:•,--/h/ � / ' Ii. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LENGTH ON ELECTRICAL POLE BASES 1 * 1 ' 18' • b' ' ;/ BOSTON iV1Ai IET° ' .fl / e r / • AT 1310- SWALES AND SLOPED LANDSCAPE AREAS (VERIFY) 1 1 ' ° 1 / 4 / / / / � ' / � Revisions r \ I -27 - " S OP- ONL / / fl, v,1/1 / ADM. 1 ( / - - - - / REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DOG`S FOR AD I _ �� 513. (V� RIFY L• / x N - 75 . EA. SIDE 12. VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF MENU BOARD, PREVIEW 1 1 ��'�� 9 ., PYLON G 1 C7 '' ,�, ' / (SEE - LON SIG GE SHT) BOARDS ILLUM INATED DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND DRIVE -THRU z Q Fe: O Q, / SIGNS PRIOR TO RUNNING ANY SLEEVES OR CONDUITS. VE IFY EXISTING I • , ' / " FOR ALL THESE LOCATIONS HOUSE I �y • / / LINE OF XISTING 5 - REMOVE ALL WITH A BOSTON CHICKEN REP. FO I 1 •� RIN iNG ANY WOOD 3 1 t / � • • • -- /� e'� / CURBS TH15 A AND INSTALL NEW CURBS 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL " BE RESPONSIBLE FOR B G '' $ LAN SOAP CIVIL 4 LANDSG � E PL r� FILL INTO THE 51 T 4 FROM THE DESIGNATED FINISH GRADE FEND 1 O 1 / • ' ila� 444,/ / / N ( AP PLAN) AT ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. (RE: CIVIL) _ x I A I d / �: +o LANDS CAPE �' i . 4 / / ROUND TOP > 1 ❑ 6 I � ' / // EXISTING = IDEWALX15T1N "TIARD TORS" SIGN TO BE REMOVD x I L.P. .. / BOLLARDS TO 3a LANDSCAPE III BE PAINTED I �z r � I � __ - / f� RIFY) TO REMAIN / TRAFFIC YELLOW _ �" I I - - - ' RI : 7:1 , �' // // 1 1 IPE C S ' R / Z b " DIA. STL. PIPE - FILL 2 2' EN GROAGHEMENT —� ..- I DBL. STR MENU BOARD DRIVE -THRU C VERIFY) � / "EXISTING ENGE" TqE REMOVED W/ NON - SHRINK I 12'x20' GONG. 541Pel / 1, Architect Seal - k GROUT d ROUND TOP 1 DO NO T ENTER APRON (NO COLOR) i GO N G. TAI RS / 1 m 1 51G� p` ' ' �� H R =28 ❑ ° i o n - 1NG ( SE�pTL. 2 /SP -! ) `r \ / Q �,'� :�� Q' d 1 L.P. / - / ' // �`, • • y,, ' i- • PAVEMENT 2 6' C ON• STAI' • ` / ' // / SPIRAL CURVE DATA: SURFACE MATCH ALL EXISTING CURBS I _ - I ING A` 2 __ - // SEGMENT OF OFFSET SPIRAL INCREASING IN RADIUS AND ASPHALT ELEVATIONS 1 ' • 3/5 1) \ `i / /// / 1 SOUTHERLY INSIDE OFFSET = 26.00'. "L5" 142 +30.44 WITH ADJACENT SITE r ❑ L.P. _ � - - / /r ' / P.S. 5 = OIdl5'. A = 0.40. OVERALL 51RAL LENGTH = a (RE:GIVIL FOR SLOPES) ONLY LANDSCAPE L ANDSCAPE 1 / _ // / ; I , , LONG CHORD SEGMENT = N 33 N 89d 56 00 E _ 24 _3.1 2' 2 ❑ LANDSCAPE _ — _ — /" ' IRAN 011 /// ''°� / ; 250.00 d36'09" E, 158.94' - — �— — — / ( RE: LE GT /�' , / / CONCAVE WESTERLY. O O II 9- O c�� , E X ST:NG LANDSCAPE M I GJ ° • EXIST 'G LIGHT , / / / � � / coo OO • -.• • OC ►O 0 000 0 Ir r • ° • - - • p� a � -� �O � � / �` X POLE (RE: ELECT) . • / / i / 'v ' V 'V Z 0 0 O x- SAW GUT A ND REMOVE I _ _ / / //i / 1 X X X X X X X `` r / 1 / ¢ THIS AREA '' r r — 1 / / / // / 1 C x ENCL x "'PLC/ i ' ( --x- /(1' -I" b SPACE = b2' -5" .° 1 b' -5" 9 SPACES = Q ' -'7" • y / ' / / / // 1 / ' �C �L COMPACTED GRAN. • / / / I! a ' FILL (SEE CIVIL) �% RE- LOCATED SH ENCLOSURE - CONSTRUCT _ l WING TRASH ENCLOSURE TO B // /' / /�/ / / ti 1 C r , /, �1 S DEMOLISHED AND RE LOCATED , r / �/ _ m / THE SAME A EXISTING VERIFY WITH ALL / / / ' 18" GONG. FTC. ' CIVIL, LAISCAPE, AND PROPERTY OWNER . I CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE , , � / z � P ' �EXISTING � / FORE GT LOCATION PRIO TO MOVING FOR ALL PATCHING AND CURB /SiD)WALK 4 0 / / /�/ / / a r� I AL IGNMENT WITH NEW CONS TRUCTI N / /� O O SI GNAGE OF ETiN� TR�S ENCLOSURE) s / , / / ` , y// , z p i_.-- �� �r� TO REMAIN R1i1 \\ l ONLY (VERIFY W/ OWNER PRIOR T.0 1 / �/ / _ O 0 ` , F � \ ♦ I ANY WORK DONE) (' a / / / / / r°-2 .- 1 1 _, c b. r / /' _ ♦ // / / ' / ' W ___ NO /WORK OR STA 'lNG l�\O , POI IN THIS AREA OF 4 , L _.!_ - � / z t- p m w ' d / 1..6:r . ♦ e / / / 1 O�lNERS PARKIN 011 THE' \DAYS OF APRIL 3 -16, Igg4) .' • ' / p- IL ILI \ \ % _ • •____ ° I CHRISTIAN / / / / / F— l ~ l I' -b" / ' / EXISTING P RKI} � L9 I5 l BE RE- SEALED AND c e I MA TFI -'a'C • • % / �' ' ' ' Z O �f /\ T: ` / I R e / / / /CT ` / / w in , ' RESTRIPP�EIa TO I VOf'•�IGIN�L STRIPPING PATTERN FLOO i / ; , , , 1 J �"� REFER 0 Civil_ ? ID CEO- ENGINNERS REPORT FOR-- -- I -- P • BOLLARD DETAIL - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ANY O \ +ER ?�D,YTI,ONAL WORK I N THESE AREAS. 1 r / // // 14 z U-I ii. LE 2 / I MAP / z in 3 /4 " =1 : -O II NOTE: VERIFY LOCATION ° ■ ' \ v \ \ - ° _ PACIFIC NW • . F� GNT LA r / / I tr `- ti tr Cr tr I N , � r t ! ' ' ' in OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES / / \ • VIDEO PRODiJGTS MUST T U R N StIGHT" / / / ' 1 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION \\ \ / / / / / / - - - - - -- - -- // ( , / 1 / / / / , / • / / n (L.P) PROVIDING NEW LIGHT POLES {STING PAINT _ - - — J ,N• / / / � / 1 11 TRIPPING - - -- - -- _ — _ _ 1 s / / /11 r EX STIN c 9 /l 1 / / Il��� 0 AALL "0/STOMEri - -- t /* D / EXISTING ENNE AND 51ALKS TO B 1 f I • / / / ' PARKIN ' G EE / / r / / TO THRU 51NAGE TO BE RE- LOATED RE- CONSTUCTED (R. CVIL DOCUMENTS) • P ♦ ' ' / / / / / ' SITE ®ATA r +TI \ OUE 5 / ; / ' • f FLORT i __ SITE AREA 56,574 S.F �i ` \ \ \ \ \ ■ _ / _ - -- -- 5 -O (VE RIFY) WIRE MESH \ \ „ 5 173 SF. r- �-�� 1 . 1 - L - - -- / 6 " b 'BUILDING AREA r ^ lid SGREENING - _ 51D . :i ' \ ti , \\ \\ ' \ ♦ t —�- r — J" , IIU M a * - d - 6 GONG. WALK OVER �, 2 "DIA STD. PIPE RAIL "----- � � . II '', •;:;I ,. fDI ammo ` 6 GRA NULAR COMP. FILL r °'' pi t:1 HANDRAILS BOTTOM /► �' • , e • A • , PARK 'G REQUIRED : (1/200 S.F.) -BLDG 26 SPACES l_.' 1 ��� RAILS. WELD ALL ° • • ' , e ' Q / W/MEDIMUM BROOM FINI I. / 12" • (TYP) 1 � ���4 JOINTS, GRIND SMOOTH CHRISTIAN ° , / A ►����• PRIMED 4 PAINTED MARIG / / 41' (VERIFY COLOR W/ OWNEf� ( BE RE LOC ATED) / FND 5/8" IR WITH A • , .♦..♦. - • / / / PARK 'G �' ' G PROVIDED 46 SPACES Date ► � �� ��� , _ ` _ YPG IN A MONUMENT m „ � , � , � , � , � __________' -- / BOX MARK 05HD ` HAND I C A PPED PROVIDED : 2 SPACES ►����♦ /, i� a i_ t - - -- ba 20' ; ' 1 - • ' E .J. • • Dra wn B 1 1 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 48 SPACES By • �� X4 I A1J � % I // 1 0 - • SIM. KMG ' 3 � � !�� - _ PROVIDE TOOL JOINT HEAVY / ' / GROOVER/JOINTER BROOM ~ ` € / ' a � '- + 1 MIN. DEPTH OR ALT. Checked By �► . Zee GAARDE AVE • / ' APPROVED METHOD. PARKING RATIO 9 SPACES / 1 S FINISH I/� RADIUS TYP. - • _ _ 1 1 Issued By (BGi) GALV. STEEL SLEEVE 1 � ' PROVIDE EXPANSION, SITE COVERAGE 9.15 WELD PIPE RAIL - I 1 JOINTS ON EACH SIDE - LANDSCAPE COVERAGE • (19,723 S.F.) 34.86 TO SLEEVE PAIN .\ ( H 1 OF WALK AND MIDPOINT �- TMs, r Seale W/ RUST PROHIBITING Flit GRADE BICYCLE OF WALK BICYCLE RACKS : (1/15 PRK SPACES) 4 REQ D. • st GROOVED NON - SLIP I • I ` �• � (SEE DTL. /5P - AS SHOW: 0 Job No. p R T 0 li" 6° / IN LIEU OF CONTROL/EXPANSION JOINT DTL5.) `' ' 'Si 94136 (APPROVED " STAMPED G G" METHOD CAN BE USED 0 P. RAILING AT CONCRETE STAIR TYP. O" (T CONC. AIL 15 TO BE USED AT ALL WA LK SITE P LAN sheet No. li 2 I DETAIL 15 USED WHEN OR MORE STAIR RISERS ARE 4 3/S "= I' - H15 DETAIL I _ 1 , , m 3/4 1 0 TH S 2 () PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY CONNECTIONS) �I = 20 ' S P NECGESSARY TO AGGOMODATE GRADE GRANGE INTO SITE. Q , = �� . — � - � ,rr��� �� ������ caa %.,....-1-.,...-t_t, • 1 0 0 D 0 El 0 28 //2 // -'' 2- , ^^ ��� ' ~ 1/2 /, '^ '~ -___ - 11 �_-��- -____ __ '^ " �� r � / 74' ' 1 1'-4" O'-�" 2 ^ U" 1 1'-4~ � � -� / - - - - --- - --- -------- ----- - -' ---- ---- U :''', ���� , � ���� , 1" 6'-1 1 /4� 3 1 /2. 1 3 /4' 3 1 /2y 5 1 /2" 7'-7 1 /2^ ` ' 1 /2^ 10'-2 1 /4" 1' _ � �� � s- 1 '/ ' ,9' 1/2" ' � FACE PLATE ���� FITTING FOR CO2 I | � ---' ---- - 4 4' 0" 9 ' - I s _____ ___ 4 0 , 7' - 'mak 2' - 4" 6' - 0" Mk A I 101 / 1 W : - : 0 4 N1.4 j - 9" 1 0 0 , tit , _____ $ .. -v I ' ' _-- ' ' � �� ~ r '- , =_- -=-_-__.-- M ECHAN ICA 4 _ . X ,,,,, II 1 IIII' X ... I 1 I I \ X____\__ I 1 . 1 , I I , , 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 , 1 MAN : 10 4 .......... ....1 „_, ,,,, ,1 „.. :5, , ,„ ', v . , ,-0; FO b ..., 1 l' (21 .! z 0: /� `� / < ': .11 , Ill 4 ... ART _W„A : 1 1 V POT WASH ."..... . 0 1. Mil .ill 0 i I, „ ,, I, :: Er r:az...ma ., . ,e4.).:„... / 11 i D16 T 011..,W, dI 4 0 1 #. ______ b - V Egli HD ,,,,,. li :,,, i i r ' • Lip r El 105 i , f 4 1 HALL / e FD 1 , .....—. N . ......... 71 I A ro , I ivy ^ ~ - 1 -0" .~ Er°- "�� � �� z TOWARDS DRAINS. _ ��_ �J0 �K8 ,. `` u�� • � / " w � / ~ w�' _iii . Or ("\J : .1 e < . �� | ' | � I 6" h.x28 d.x86" w. . `i 1 i i -: 'i to, j.,-- CONCRETE PAD FD Z.0 ,-. .-- j 40 1 KITCHEN 'SI FR N LINE DINING 1 _ $ r 1 - t. • P 4 - i - 1.10 DASHED LINES INDICATE I: -,,,,' It Imil I AREA OF CONCRETE TO IN LIEU OF GYP. BD. q• ALL I H Z..0 -. r i. 1 . . � � / - ` FLAGSHIP, FOOD PREP 4 1 , .......... i 1 , 1 I . i 1 .., -r . � * � 1 ) N .1 . �� . � . i� � '...6 fl 04 t 't 0 „ 71 P, ,T 11 1 ^ ` — � 0�0� 4.0 � � �r n | � � 2TI � � - w , $ ^ 0 11-X— i _ '. • 1 t I 2.8 I �� 0 �� ' £ �� - i ,i4 1 a ro rs,A .0 lid 0 _bowie. s__ El 1 ''' "4" ) 7 i A .C 1 0 V I T / �� � j ' -11"t I . ' - 2" 2' - 4" DASHED LINES INDICATE � p � u o �� of, ', � . 2 g , � iti 2' - 11" ' )1. ' -10 3' -0" ), tot. 115 114 to 't . . ,, -1,4' i „,„,„„„„„, ,;_ .,., | � � ^ | 0 � / X _ g � -, I i i " �� , 7' - 1 0" '-- 1 __., 1 t .: i � Al EL - ` " . �w �� �� =��~ ~ �~ � � ���/ � r� ����A��o�■ 1�4�.^. �� � �y � � �. - - "r ���" _�. ��n���w�uu� �� �^���w� _�^ _.^e�� w^��^_4�*�wy�` X - ~- � � � w � ' �� { d � ~ ' I / �' � �/� ^ '/� " ' '/" '/� ~ � '/ ' ' ' ~ '/� - �- - - - /- 7 � � | ' ' - '=== ,-~- / ~ ^ | � � � � jrt k (HOLD) - ' ~^ | | b � w, ,AS. CEILING � ° � IN c PROVIDE PLYWOOD BACKING ,, RUN 6» | �� � '; |N OFFICE AREA-SEE ' �� ' - � . i � | w� - ' m/cnx�m ELEVATIONS. | | ' � | � ~ ' | ' ' ��� � I | ��� � ' ���� ; ~ I `\ ��- ��— N� � �-�-� | � ' I - �� ~ . _� - I ^' ` -- .4 � , 1 Z. � ^ f. �� __ � � � _ . -~~ �~~~~~~--'---------'-- ------ — -------- -�= � - -- -- --- --- � -' �- ------ -��------ --------'' ------- --- - -- --- �� ------' - �-- '--- T[N�NT TD PR0V|DE FIRE EXT|N�U}SHERS AS �EQU!RED PE� APPLICABLE C0DE3 � � TAG QTY DOOR DESCRIPTION D0UR FRA�E HDW RN|SH DOOR TYPE� TA� QlY. HARDYW�RE DES�R�TON �ASONRY ��LL C0�STRU�OON' 4" ROCK FACE BL0CK R0R , AND SHALL COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION ��H FIRE MARSHAL. ^ / k, , .- ,, 4 \ , TYPE TYPE � ' ' ~/" �^'� \ / / ' ' r == � �==����� -�= �'------�=��-`�'--===-'--=='-- �-'===--- ----- - -�----'- -- ==-�-�--- -=- -' ==� -- ------ -- - GRADE PLYWOOD & 2x6 WOOD STUDS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD- `~_� , � ^ J' Orx7' 0 ALUM. FRAMED ANOD TO H-4 1 1 /2 PR' 8UTTS. 5 1/2 HA�ER B81�7g US28D | C�SHED L|NE iND|CAT[� 5/�' �0�DERB w/ R ' FR0� C0NCRETE SLAB / ;" j ; .Ni' � ����� I GLASS DOOR (ENTRY) -v � AL-1 ALUM H-1 �/�C EXT. 1' LOCKSET� �CHLACE D50S �H0 US�5D / T0 18 A F F� -' - ~'' ~ ALL DOORS TO BE KEYLESS |N D|RECT|ON 0F E�RE8S U ,c DIMENSION P LAN RESUBMITTED FOR DESIGN REVIEW 2j27195 wr 0 | ' 1 K|CKPLAJE' HAGER J4x12 US32D ( � ) � � � 1/4' * ' . - J`-U'»7'-O ALUM. FRAMED 4L_1 ALUM H_2 ANOD� TO | TEMP. 1 WALL STOP' HAGER 234W ' 0 !� ; ����' GLASS DOOR (VESTIBULE) MATCH EXT. /11 ' �L�3S � H-5 � pR. BUTTS' 5 �/2 HAGER FB81�1X�Rp i SJ20 YY0OD 3TUDS �� 16 O�C w/ 5/8 �YPSU� B0�RD 80TH S/DES � ALL INTERIOR FINISHES TO BE CLASS 2 OR BETTER � � � [ m������ WINDOW � 1 EX|T DENCE VON DCPR|N Qy27NL (hNLE6S N�TED OTH[�� S EE PLAN FOR �ALL TH|CKNES3- ' � - � : ~-��/'� 3' O o J/4^ FLUSH VYOOD H W ��~~����~ � ��� < 3 > 0 \� / � �§�� 2 SOLID CORE DOOR (WASHROOMS) SC-1 16 M. H-J ' � �� (24'' x36" ' � | � -- .8LE � )O� �|RU<E =L^JE' \ �� DUPR|N Q�27N� �A3H[D L|NE |ND|CATE� n/u VY0NDER8OARD FROW C0N �LAB \~_/' � � �� ���� UL » ux . , u* 4 0 � �O�|NA| \ 6' S0 l ' DOUBLE -� DOOR STRIKE - ' �� ' VON TO 18 A.F.F. � � ���' � 1 FLUSHBOLT: HAGER 293D US26D F. � � � ,, J'- x7' �/4" HOLLOW MTL H � -1 H M NOM � �-' VISION - � | CLOS[R' DORWA 7O05 - � - ' ALL |NTER0� D|WENS0N� ARE F RO� F�C[ O F STUD TO FACE 0F 8TUD. U WLES3 � , , � � ����� 1 DR. ~ (OFF|C[1 UNDERCUT DOOR 1 1 ' ' 16 H-4 p-1 �� P ANEL 1 THRESHOLD: HAGER 432S NOTED OTHERWISE. .c � » �� ,k '° ��0� ' ` '- 18 GA. GA. � �� / / / | i � \ � / ' � » 1 PR. J'-8"»7'-0 3/4" INSULATED H W'-� H N H-5 |NT � p-1 I AL 1 SC 1 I H� 1 | I H | � | | H�-3 | 1 GASKET SET HAGER 873S 2x4 WOOD STUDS (� O/�' w/ 5/8" B0ARD BOTH �|DES� `~-'/ ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE MUST BE PRESSURE TREATED MOISTURE ^ ���� i. r ' HOLLOW �TL DR (SERVICE ENTRY) 18 CA 14 �A E�[' P-3 - - - m- --- - ! KICK D0� DOOR STOP HAGER �S2OO US26D v ' � � ' ------ - �'- ' �' ' ( 5 > RESISTANT WOOD. � � ', J'-0^x7'-[�x1 3/4" HOLLOW MTL H M -3 H � TAG QTY. ARDWARE DESCRIPTION 2 ARMOR PLATE HAGER 4O��J�H US32D \._~/ � , __ ii � K O ) 1 DR (�ECHAN|C�'' R0O�) 1O SA 15 �A H-G �~�-�~ 1 RAIN H00D: HAGER 8l03AL : ����UV� �� � � ' / DR. ` � ROOM) | ' ' � H-1 BY STOREFRONT MANUFACTURER: KAWNEER- FINISH BLACK --------�--�- 1 LEXAN SECURITY WINDOW: NEVYSTAWp LEX�N 1O:1 0 ALL �AL� CON3TRUCT0N FACiN� K{TCHEN VV0RK AREAS WUST UT|L|ZE �0|STURE Drawn ~ » * � J'- 1 [/'x7'-0 �/4" HOLLOW MTL. H M.-1 H W. H 7 1 1 /2 PR. BUTTS: 4 1/�� x4" BALL BEARING US26D H-8 1 1 /2 pR 8U��' �/'x4 1 /y H��[R B8�27y US�OD ' THERMALLY BROKEN ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT SYSTEM / « \ RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD � DR. (KITCHEN) ' 18 �A 1O CA. - \ r- � � 1' KEYED DEADBOLT w/INSIDE THU�8TURN 1/2 PR. ' ' - w/ 1" INSULATED GLASS ON 4" STOREFRONT SILL- \`-� � . ` ' � ~. ~, w 1 PASSAGE SET. SCHLAGE D108 RHO U326D �' '� FINISH' BLACK ANODIZED �' � Checked By -- 1 PUSH/PULL SET 1 K|C KPU�E� HA�[R J4x12 US32D | ' ` �� `^'' ~~^~~^~ »' 3'-O^x7'-U^x1 �/4� HOLLOW MTL H # -3 H.M. CLOS�R ' WAX|WU� EFFORT TD 0PER/�E DOOR� �HALL NOT EXCEED� u ( 8 > 1 DR. (EMPLOYEE 18 GA. 16 � H-8 1 WALL HAGER 2J4VV � A 85 LBF J77N FOR EXTERIOR D0O�S ~ RCT 1. \ / ' ` ^ ' o ' GA. `~^---�' 1 THRESH0LD |N� 6� SILL SWEEP H-7 1 1 /� PR. BUTTS. 5"«4 1/2" HAGER B8127y US26D \ ' / � B 5 LB \ 22 ' 2N / FOR INTERIOR DOORS � � issued �� ��y��� - ~ 9 1 J'-O 3/4 HOLLOW MTL. H.M.-1 H.M. H-4 p_1 1 SET `~~'`^' � �- - ��----�-- 1' LOCN3ET� SCHLAGE D58S RHO US26D THERM ALUMINUM FRAMED STOREFRONT SYSTEM / pROy|DE AND |NSTALL OCCUpANCY 5|�N |N A C0�SP|CU0U3 L0CAT|0N iN � ~°� w�~~`^ \ ) DR. (TEAM RM.) DOOR 1 18 GA. 10 CA H-2 BY STOREFRONT FACTURER: K��NEER- FINISH BLACK 1 CLOSER: DORMA 7604 w/ FL8AT 8LAS� 0N 4^ ST0REFR0NT S|LL � '' t � ` / ` ' ' 1 1/2 PR BUTTS- 4 ,�' BALL BEARING US26D 1 K)C�p E' HAGER 34x12 USJ%D ' //� /cmrc�cu - / R ) ACCORDANCE WITH STATE & LOCAL CODES. i � � � 1' BLANK CYLINDER ^ ° u*/ ' F|N|3H� BLACK AN0D|Z[D \`_,/ � u 1 � FLOOR STOP: HAGER BL6209 US26D ° 1 PUSH/PULL SET ' � Scale �� | 1 CLOSER H-8 1 1 /2 PR. BUTTS: 5 1/2" HAGER BB1279 US26D _ x ~" 1' PRIVACY SET: SCHLAGE D4OS RHO US26D � � 1 1/2 PR. BUTTS: 5~x4 1/2" HAGER BB1279 US26D 1 K|CKPLATE' HAGER 34x12 US32D � - | 1' P UL� SET ' ' � 8 Job No. „ ' PUSH/PULL - 1 WALL STOP HAGER 234W , 1 '' ~~'~~ ^^ ^ NOTE: ALL HARDWARE MOUNTING HEIGHTS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE STATE & 1 CLOSER: DORWA 7604 � � LOCAL ACCESSIBILITY CODES. 1 KICKPLATE (PUSH SIDE 0NLY)' HAGER 34x12 USJ2D � 1 WALL STOP: 234W °===~_==� _ _ ._____ _ __ _ ____ _.�__ __ __� __ _� �__ �_ _ ______ _.� _--. _ '_ — -� . _ ' ^����� �����y�� ^' � - - —�- — _ - . __ '_ _ ' -_ - __'--- _' -_---_ -__-_ _ _'_-' �--- _ ' .'''-~�__- -_ . _ _ - . �_ _-_ __-_-_ _ . - _ _.� �~~� � _' - -�`.~��~~~_.�' ' - - ___' - _ __ _� �. _ ---_� -- _ _-_ -, '' - - � ��' � � ��.��� 8� m. ' ' SCHEDULE ��V���U U U ��K�� U��U 8 � K��� U���� ����U U��� � U K—'�� � �~^^~^~~^~~ . � ��� x��m�~ u~�m~~»�«u~�n �x�� `�~x�~v n x�.v ,v xm�� =/�° s` ^'^�^^^�� ,�',' �~`-�^� ,z�"~-rr�*w�'~� =^� �" .��°.~-`.`.'" _��~�=�==�=`.°=°�.~'����� ���'.``^-"�°= ^ ^~.-~��,~".=-'~^r�_^°r�"�"�-�� ..`.=' `����s��"�u=.~.~��,�.-° =�~������~e"=-_°~~�°�^` � � ~=^_°=~=�= =°. �°~�~_..'"==""^=.�.~=� '-=�.=~�� ,�- �^=~=-^��".�°�.,==, '=�~-'"�^,�=�'=��. -, ��_ �.' "=rr �.� ~~~' - -~ � � � �------�---- � ��ALE: NC>�E ���LE: NONE A-2 , SCALE: NONE _ _ __ _ _ _ _ �� .~~~~�-_ --- '___ � �'�---~_�---.----- -~~~--=a�osm�_=�� ------'--------~------'- ---'- ���� ------- -- ` rr��� � c�*�*qg��K�� .~4�mEn��-°*�: z�^=c�x m�z-��-, � �s� m�� ����=����� ;xwm �`� �c�� �� , o�a�'��� r �m�sw ( i - I ' ,'46, 44,„ 4",,.Z - 4:4-ISI - Cailfr4Nt1. - k,e, - ,e - & - .3,,,,75A 7, ,a '''',:;?•Z? ' - .:(..m."7 , ' W'f." If:: , - 7.,,, ;: - ° - . 1,V IvvPso: . .4 - - - 4--a . - 1_,..-„,. t., .k? :""6-," " _ _ .,.... -.:.: ---- .r: -,...,,,.; rr,4 , Z.:;- , A ",-.. .;"7--ii:.0 -, 54.-- -4 1. 4 . :;r"..rd, lit v,t -'17 tu. •-t. -A.,..--L t ,. -. - ,t • 1 . „,.., ,, - I Z . .. P . - .. , 1 . .' 1; L 1 :' '; '-, ■ • 1 A g o k AA i ` 4 fr. 4 irik -- - t- . 7, t 7 4A.vp " ' - '' . ., . NV • n7 ,: f , , .. ' - INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED INDIVIDUALLY LIT LETTERS- -,___ ci ou 1 FABRIC AWNING - PROVIDED BY PROVIDED & INSTALLED 2' - 0" / 2' - 0" EQUAl J ENGTH 0._ Iiii : ., .. .; COPING SECTIONS OWNER, INSTALLED BY OTHERS BY OTHERS , CJ CJ , we T/PARAPET A . ` All i tial .!''.4s:'0411,-- ..'":F44*4-,IV-P-11*-1 ';"'e'jFzVE4S'fr-4..nt- -,Z ', LAItak.1%..-„41 „-4 - * ", - , EL. 1 6' -- 1 $ 444.4. , -. 1,, --Itvir v,,,A ,t..1.0 -',3%.1:' -7: AA-2- - -1.: - 4.V-'4 4 -OW -:-._ . z ig&X " ,..,azo....,:ivii--,-44-: --,4i,.t._,..:-go=-- - -,-sAl ; :it' r6. 4.t. , %$' '-''',0•i '' ,... 84 ,, ir.o•I' 1. 3 ..a.. '''''. - 41- - :24,W -1 '2 -.` i'43.? l '''47 . :,5, ' V•:. 10`,;:":, " - ' I -, - - 'As CI .. „ ..--' ----- ... ITIlnl:::1: 1 T/PARAPET -. 4 s , < .. ICE i ROOF LINE ---- ---.1?- b - ilPtS-16), ... 8 d . . _ , i C•1 _ 5B - 1.0 . -.,Vr ' I : 1 I 1 . i ... _- 4 '''&41- '' /H WI e MS P - 5 ; 4- - - -t%%Atc4"- . - 1- "*O"WT.P-fAMI - I:A ft ' 4- `'S" - &-: , arS-W-"''i'zektroftVg:- -,- atgltOklAti - -*A , .,.' ---1 46' - "-Nr4 - - - Lik,:-' 1 .'-' 1 -,---- - 14 41- ' 45 Y- 4 41.- 1 ' - '''''. G 4 -4 0 ` "•'=`;' 4 V - 4"4 .4 &; r4 WW-4 , -Or 4T IX" L -r i 4:7 -.. "'"-` 7 "'Z'Sr''' .- t!ir - * 416. -fIsir . - - .A EL 1 2s 0 -1* ''''., . : 7 -- , ' . _ IT ` ._,....V.44 ''', , VW"P'' , - P ,a - ' ,.... ' ' '-• '",r'414'.1 .;, ":'::. - - - _ B/NG ' ' - ..:, .:. -... .!'',_.-- Zieeee-4, , .4 k& _ ''' ;'.04,90 41, - ,,,,:f . - ,- s4... ,-,...,.. ...„.4 ..aver: "ig,si,,ftV...S..7',' - -424. s- , W , 144. - III- '4" 1- -4. - 0 - Stins#44 7 . : 117.,,,- ' ;,. "111W 4 L'I.,"„ss,"-Fv,.. wA- '--E-4-':40:VSV-„, . !- .7.. - A I rt.- ,,,-, .1s ,-- A.-'-a --- dc._44 -.•-• -- -4* - 3rato - - 4,3=-A-r„74-1-ze---r , arv- - , .,,,, - - -4, - --- - ..-- AWNI ' ' Cr > : r n EL 8' - ■Ibh. ,.. =1' 1 itiiiIMINNTh - Amon ii mi A i% ism CO - MN ..---- 1 . NE0 :IGN NV 1 M - IIIII iiiii I I II I al (.3 , ...,........,,,,„ ,, It , .., , E i , I , a ... es ....... j 0 EN „ , . „,, „„ 1 im En : I. . ' STEEL BOLLARD - PAINT P-5 VIII I - 7 /10.-**,-*t 1 Miff i , . ail _......... i _ I. T/ i :-: ON II frowsioligr ..• mi . / E. , I 0 Mil .-- -A7 _._,,.. .-vsa sr, ,,,,-,. :-. ,-.7 - ' 1, 1'." - ' . --i" ,, '''`'.:',-- " II` - '''. . - W." . 'It - ' -,,, . - .-- II . "..:; " 1,4 ..' ' X -:-i -,e,"A - --.,.. - "'" 1.- iz.'-g , , ''''• ,, ,-':-- - P - - - -_„, _ _ _ ", . _ 4 . , L _ , ,_,,„ _ „ , _ MI 0- .. W '''''''''''' ' - ,..i.,e,e,;,, ,... . ,,,,,..- - . , ....: - --#.,, . -- -ea-4--442,.--- 4:1 4,4. , .t,,,L A, --;. ve - V-Aie .■.- ' - - , -- - 14 •-'.--,--,- '. :=". .-. ‘"-.4-10-." - - .r...• _ =-. ---, ----" -..* " .; w ,,,- 7,4,:' ...- - „--, , ..,,,.. , "-#.4.4.-_ __.,11LX•NfiAk , _ ,- -- - - ---- - -- - .. -,---- .- . -.A1--...P,aa*,-41,oz-a...5tlt;:.t ..,,wk,„vitiodwaft....tmwt,,.,...,,,,,,c..., ,.,,-4.1, -.. jtke,,,,pitt -?-- - 44- - .4,74 . ew . ,,.. ,...., -.,*. .4, .,.- - --.%•- - -,,,,; . ?I x ,i,„..-- ,4-...04.: ,,-- _-_-,",.,: , -,„ ..„:„_._ _ .....,... . . .. , ._ . „ , taa a m ia .3... jaamiaaaltaalima a UM* lama. • aavalamas mmm a ................................................ 1111111.1111.1111M 1■11.1=111111111M IL a• i 2 . ‘ _ _ _ _ . ._ ._ , _ , _ _Tau_ . L.--,..E., „...„te -AMA . f.A., , f4..-M s t,S,tmgm..intger Insimmtgemr -VALV---`1"4 _ _ . , _ _ _. ..., , _ _ _ _ „ , _ .. _ ____•••••... _ ._ 1 -.Iv).* - - I 'gni i ' ,i RAILING- I 2 i ' evisions t. - PAINT p _ 6 PAINT p_ 0 - .4. _ " R . r 3'-3" k 3'-3" I.1 . 1 J ...: r .__ ...... .. . :. . .. : FOUNDATION - SEE - ---- - ' 19 ,- 1 _:'- := . : STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS 1 ,. . .,.. , 4'1 1 -.. .., .• , _ „. ,,: , ./. s • , i - - r NOTE; ..., .7.. BUILDING SIGNAGE AND AWNINGS .: .7. • % TO BE PROVIDED Bt OWNER AND ) . INSTALLED BY SIGN ‘GE CONTRACTOR. :- '',. , ____ i _ _....__. _ _ .....„ ...,., ? SIGNAGE CO NTRAC_T R_TO COORDINATE ' : L EXACT SIZE AND A OUNT OF SIGNAGE j j - ALLOWED WITH LOC L AUTHORMES . ". FOR FINAL SIGNAGE LAYOUT. --- . _ -.. . * . - - ' SIDE ELEVATION \ . , ,-„ , ...--,-..-4- , - -- sr- ,,--„K, - - - -- ■ - r.44 -- - L 0, .,-,-, 4 ......,“- :; ,,,'• , ..- - WV,-- - ..? `,,,,,,' is '- f}. . .r . ..Y .., 4,1 . ..n .YDr Ttr ..1. v.4 • - • - ...,. - _ ...,A" ..7..a -,, ..X.,,:r..4 4. ' --'' e....1 4., 4.1, ^._ • pc., .. .%:: ", . s ...ri,N. - q - 74e,;,, ..: - ,r - , - -to 4.4„? .....,..4. , ‘,..y,^ ' s„. „, 4..fv ..4,4-, ,4.--4.-- 4 4 , ..:--4 , 4.4 ... .+1. .. .....^-5. - -1 -,,,,,,,,..., ...,..±..-, - ,1 t- .. ....,,, r*,..^ ..E.1,2 ....■...7L-A .. - ,, ,, ,, 44-1.. , W.7, , ,, ,6 .- ,, x , ' -,,,, ...4j...., .,..... .„ .r... ..,:csp.,,.. , ,.,„ ; SCALE: 1 /4" =1 . -0" --- . - • - , , _ - - , - mammallamsww - - - - - - - -, - ,-, , - , . - . -. ' _ -, ‘ .- .... " = ^ ' TAG DESCRIPTION _ . illissommommummmi .1- 5 ..- k SHIELY MASON ■ PRODUCTS: ROCK FACE BLOOK, BLOCK COLOR #P-1 , , _ ..- ? , . f : ilk ILI CI CI III MORTAR TO MA CH BLOCK COLOR PARTNER CAN SE READING ROCK FORMULA T AT MUST BE APPROVED t - 0 „ - -, .; 1 i FIRST COURSE 9F ROCK FACE BLOCK PAINTED P-4 - ,- ,,,,i,.,..: ;-,, -,....., 6 , X C1- 1,4146<:_c:j.cc . 1 i' 1 1A y , ,, , , 4112k I ... .- : III ,.- .. ' 10 ALUMINUM STO' EFRONT FRAMING w/BLACK AN DIZED FINISH , . I A _ ; NIP' 1 NV ,... ,, : .: . • 0 i , ... , , „ , v. I • . , • ., ,, -0" EQUAL LENGTH INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED INDIVIDUALLY LIT LETTERS. _ ' --10"), _ . ALUMINUM TRIM PIECE w/BLACK ANODIZED FINI H I VI ES = 1- _ . COPING SECTIONS FABRIC AWNING- PROVIDED BY PROVIDED & INSTALLED DWI I 3 ' I. 0 • a i 7.€ T PARAPET I OWNER, INSTALLED BY OTHERS BY OTHERS rr - - --■' - 1110fIrlir : EL 16'-i0a - ,, ,...,<. - 4.:. - -; ,..* - : , ....t... ,- : . -#L4w5:4 , - -, ; - ..o.* - -.4; , Air.14-..:Nt-... _.-z. - .''''''-' 3-.44.V41,...T -- i„.• ; .` .*=;.;.. IA - i„...,,Z, .4. VI" ,.:-;. _27.,W-1, - - 53 1 METAL COPING °REFINISHED OR PAINTED itat of V--- ',. :: -V tlikV - lkik - 5: - _ - 7,r - „ ,-, i - ACeit:' -' ' -,ttr, .L...•$.i7.4 - ".- .= Pa> .;wik. IFW ,:, r: , - _'$'vf .5',..X.i.M.., $0+ I 4 P- 9 , ,, , ., ......, . .,._,, i , ,,, , ,, ,,i 1., : 11 4 1111' - " n - - " , Ak All, I , 1 DECORATIVE E.I.F.S . LI _ - .., * - .......# I ....j JOINT 1 - - c a _. 1 . . ONT. BACKER ROD I EXTERIOR INSUdATION FINISH SYSTEM (E I F.S ) ROOF LINE I 5A w /SANDPEBBLE TEXTURE ci I l 11 0 ' Ze E.I.F.S. COMPATIBLE L__ 3/4" / EALANT AS TO MANF. COLOR TO BE PRYVIT #UT61-54-8-2-5 113 M 1 j - , & PECS. E.I F S.: COLOR TO BE DRYVIT #UT61-54-8-2 4 - - -.07,.-...--*L. 19991■1=91•91999199990 4 - 1• .- - . -.1.--V. - ,W=i7; , 4 5 ..„ - .;-, e - spt= - - t:::- 1 174, 1 V - &.,Vvit,A-- - ' 4 -4 "Vs, ..-‘ - ' ' ' V.- A-412 . C + : *:"+,,,&" ef ::, i: 1 t EL 1 2' - 118 ...e 158 ; ....,0 4,.. -,, ' -:,-,1!.; .-- ';•=4" rwl,;,?...0 , ,,,f", •, 4 " ' - 4: ;•.% -1. ' ' 4; 41. • ■- ' - _..74 3 - & , -,,,,,;. . . Wak:7;A - -96e 4 s_ ‘ 1 "4 's ......,...tfgail 4., ..„ ... „,„ _ ,....„ ,, .... ' . , , „.*, ' A , - PAINTE 1 ' '-• V - - ars.4. si 4 ..0 s- 1,•44 _ Reil, . - to` •-, I t M s&S -- L' ,_ a, tt.*.k ,-, ,,., :',4 -= .4 ki..* ' ;' , 4 1.:.' -- *'"' 4' - - f' .,. 's I 5C 1 P-5 * . .. ,.,. ,.„,..,. _....... . ,.„.,...... ,,.. 4 71 . -"4., ar.41 ./.:. ...x.* 4-----,,,,,,___ .. ,? ..-;,-, .., ,:t„ - ,:ke, - ':,,% V e - - I I -... t * t ''''; ' t, , ,, , A ,:-.4 -- --.0.3._. - =4:,... .., . ,...v._,,,t- .1 il`,..,„ - ... : :_;.•*1 - ''' . '1 '-''''00war< ' P.:-....,,,,s ..„-• = , .,-- --..-;;4.-4* - - 171; - - * • s-- AF '.. t v,__ ESAWNING „,- ,... 4- -q,.,3"-- - A, SHIELY CONTAC - : 1-612-420-7100 t :'. t i ... - ., EL 8' -0" -, - MEE _ - 2 - eg' ___,/ ----- • „,,,.....÷., L ., . A I A. ,,r` 1 ?,,,,, : . i - i. r, NM: liii / -, • z, 1 111.1 t , / OPEN 1 / / / SCORE DETAIL ,. I. / 1 / / xi I , E I 4) MATERIAL LEGEND 1,, - 1 1 I , 1 ,_ ,I ,.: E. 1 I mil i 11.. •, I i 1 .-,. : ,...,...___ , , 7 ,,,,,,, ,i_ : .:. 1 I \ .r. Eff 0 4,4,, 4- 4 P Mit 0 CCALF-: ..., r 11111: i ' .= INN -4/1 , } - _ i 1.1 ------J 11.. PAINTING _ , 11. ---- 1 , , 1 , ,, , ...- .„, vsLAB um_ ... NM siii:M. .,.. ., 4-4, Ell[ - - V .., , i 4 „. $ ' EL. 0' / ' <.>,/ 1 I i t M•SONRY ALL AREAS MU 4 1 - BE COMPLETELY DRY PRIOR 0 COATING. ., ; t; - 1 . i \ II° ALL MASONRY • URFACES RECEIVING PAINT ARE TO BE TREATED - ..., ..,,,....,,___J 69 41 , . ,ta; J„ ,, - , 4. ,,, - ; , _ 1 ---, f-T-A*- ,..-, WITH 1 (ONE) OAT OF GLIDDEN BLOCK FILLE' #5317 AND 4 ,, :- \ ,,.., , ,1 , / - ,. ,1. C O \ / i ,* 4' ‘Q;==...4 ;*" ---"e- -....- i,,,,,C. „ _ . „ , . . .. . , . - •.. 0 : I 2 (TWO) COATS GLIDDEN SPRED ACRYLIC LATE EXTERIOR ! , MASONRY & ST COO PAINT (FLAT FINISH) GLID -ON FORMULA i 1 101; , o -...... ; ; to I ...--1 1AI 2 #3525 SERIES COLORS TO BE AS SPECIFIED t ; V., ... : .,, 5 :7 r ] 6.--916 -1 i t - ■ ''. 1 ; Z , 'f oWl. -, 4 ..; L J M4TAL ALL AREAS MU T BE COMPLETELY DRY PRIOR 0 COATING. r,11., A i STRUCTURAL - RAS AND 1 (ONE) OAT ALKYL (FLAT FINISH) TANK AND STRUCTURAL w E E -.1 COPING ALL MASONRY URFACES RECEIVING PAINT ARE TO BE TREATED : , WITH 1 (ONE) OAT OF GLIDDEN RUSTMASTER HITE PRIMER #590 , . ENAMEL PAINT 5250 SERIES. COLORS TO BE • S SPECIFIED. ..-i •-;- Dat T e .,,, , 1 ,- , Drawn By .., r, i t , P : , / ! 111 AG GLASS TYPE DESCRIPTII N ___ , Checked By , T. - kr ,: FNOTE: 1 I . , , , L , i 4 RCT = ---_ 5 ''- BUILDING SIGNAGE AND AWNINGS IC) 1" INSULATING LASS ' ' issued By (Ba) . TO BE PROVIDED Bs OWNER AND 4 -- INSTALLED BY SIGNAGE CONTRACTOR. 1 - .. :. 1 SIGNAGE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE - - 4 ,... .,. . 7 ., S i EXACT SIZE AND A OUNT OF SIGNAGE 1" INSULATING LASS TEMPERED .,I ALLOWED WITH LOC L AUTHORITIES I° I 1 t : i; •, . : FOR FINAL SIGNAGE LAYOUT. . 4 ; t.- J • = - - '. ' - , Job No. i - _- , . la 1 4" TEtv1PEREI GLASS . -,. ...,- , 295097 _ _ _ - : 4 ; 2 FRONT ELEVATION _ EXTERIOR FINISH NOTES RESUBMITTED FOR .,.. .,, , _ .. ..,. , , 1 1 _ Sheet No. _ SCALE: 1 /4' =1 ' - -. 0' SCALE: NONE A...4 .,, __,__......_ _........1,3.,1,75.71.+7,24F-E-r■-■• ... a. . o- ■ -, ^ ,. SiMe..,. o- "--o^-6 A■.- o-o- A,. la I ''''''' J -4.-• DESIGN REVIEW 21 - - , .---"'''''''" ' -* --''''''''''''''''''''''''' ' -e--": T---- "'` , t - -- --- '-7- 1 - --''',"--- , " 3- ‘1 7 1"- - ' -- - - -w-7. ' 7 ._. F-: ... -"w*s-- ,,- " ----- -::'-' - - - -' - ' 1 ` ---,----- c , , -' L '0&,..s.T....1' = - -_,...-7 f - - rj......-_ - 17 - PW__Idna., ,rv .r .- ' - ' .- aT-M -- -- '*1-.'"---- - 2L/95 a 3 X -4 --- 7 --"L" - ''' I' -4 . ' ' --- .- . 1-- -- 1--- ' -r " ..- , .,....,_ :.._,-. - -- - ------ - - - - - - - ;, .„, _ ,,<,.„,.„.v.,„;-,-,„<„„„..„6.,,,,,,,„.„,-_-„,4_,,,,,,...:1/2,,,,,E„,,„0„_„„4-,..,..„„:„.„4,...„:,,w,,,,..„...,,,,,,,,yr,-..,:s.f...- .Xce. .;;-..... - ,,,,V=.4 .7 4 - .:0!af . `, ,, , , , , ,I=Ilfrat r4$0-.."-kirli7,1i!' .17`..,, ,Mria* ' ee ' *--:".'1".;* . -'1 -1'-'- - ' -4..".:'' '' ''.7P" .14 ''''''. -:*---''''''''' -4'..'"'"' ' 4.4- " IT'" '' ' I' '' -..r*'713- '''''±%.'''''';';`''''': --**'' -34.' -•.; -.4'll ' .-6'r?" ' '--- ---'4''': . 1L-41 s -.. "..."'" Y-4' -47 '''' . '- '--- ' ''': '''"•-•' ' :. -. 1, - ,.. , : - ' .. '-; - 1" 4 f inlik . . ; %V • :: ._:.. , ' Z , r ..,., -- , -, -, - <1 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED FABRIC DECORATIVE E.I.F.S. SCORE '' _ '" _ , ,„2'-0'' / EQUAL LENGTH . t 2' -0t -` .. - -, r - M.. AWNING PROVIIDED BY OWNER. JOINT COPING SECTIONS , .. INSTALLED BY OTHER. ... ..; 4 i T/PARAPET A O.J. C.J. . c -- , EL 1 6 ._ 1 0 " - !!..wif.'.. - 7 , -M . A-1 - . - .:441S .: 4I `,"' -e-'<.._,.* 4 zwz -I:4%55r:: ,t,...p.A.,--.4. , it,p, - , , ,:k. - ,,, , , ,..:1,-- - v.:.-141. ' 7.-MettX 53 - .2 : 7 E - --- :4A x- ..... , ,0-)-1--,-,-,iz:,,, .,k<:"- ' 71 -4.1 ROOF LINE ,-...4a.a...A...1.4 • ii:Aifftg • 0. :,---.....* -,.a. 614 eA.:,--7.1`... -. 7-4i1 - ^*: - ...44 ''-';*,',I.A, .417'`- ," - TT, - -P-t-xt; - _- - Ae=„ - rx.4,_ i ,,,, : -- 7r - , 7 : , - , .7 -::: _ - ..i . ' W , B a f i - OC -, , t 1 1 _ .,..--s1 \ 0 ...,..,„„,,,_ , _ - t b:\ 1 -.1,, ____. .:::',':. .. t .'.,-' 1--- 6 . . .. ' ' - 58 . ; 1, A p T /P ARAPET 2 el I \ in' -, . , ,- 4 " - - IT -40 ,,i':.4.r.,i. :..:414 - .4.: , :i . fenNO,W.4 .1 1, -1.04:W=4-"Vt-tAct -"...re 1-.'' - 't'''V.s.:,-...1.- - - ....e..- --4*. 'A-.7"P.. ".""vr-tV"_:l.%kt'5V.-.tV * - -'04 7 •44--' - - Lm5s :afro maga ----: -26.e.---.--, --....-LIA n% -2 -..,s-A . EL 12'-1 . ;0.% .-- ! '44- 4 X MA - 4; . 44 Pie ' - - ' , '- 1 , , t.: 1 \-------------.47/ 1 , , , _ ; W Z .. .. r . i5C , "..: . ,1 74..V.Fi sti l'-' ' 1- ;- - e* 1,. ..` , .:,A,:i ''*,', .• ;"4 . " BAwNING -7„ V.. ,, _ ,,.,,-*' ..,„ '-5-.4.,V41.1e,....e,,-f*-...0.44727-,'-ffi..*:i...--,,b.''.-0..914-7 „%s .._)-4-e- „A...s,*-0,- 4:-.41-..-7,-f-41.- - -1 ,.wwi_..4. ,,.:,L-grq ! :: m , I 1,!:"., , _ ....r..„.-,, : .....,-..:....,;.:3.,.,..9. - - -,,,.., ,,,..„ -.,..,,, ..rgl'-' ... - •,14;, , - ',-",--Sle , ,tr .-4 Mer - ,'4' - ' - -.• ' c V ',.%V,A, ■ W's:' its.,,A-:33 ..,e* 6 'WrVi-S'S.'k„- ,-*"-,:',-.- .'7, ..;.c. g'"IS,':V...-M"*KI'se '.70::4.1.V ...-.4 4 4 % -,,. -3...-W.0 =„7..,...: !,..,..-e;W:5,,..-',A7 PW - vii-n.,:i4-.„.4.,...4-w-,i,,,,,Ax:-.4..0„..ee kr .k-,, _ _ . EL 8'-O" • I - ill ._ , ii ._ .'• -... Eli , IIII Milli FLU H ( Fl ;OX- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- -1 ,, : . -----r- .. (2, 11:21Z I , . ts.. 11111 II j,L,...1,1. CiO 1 billiffitteettill ...1_,., .- ' III A _______ _______ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ __ 4:4 4.0.,Namwom mom: it11:::::::::::**Mosv 1 A , , - 0 1.-- , . 6 II 0 _____ _ _ __ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ 4,.................................:..„ ...,_ , : i. , NI , am • ,,...............,......., . .:. ________ _ _ ...,V-4%.44.4,4■•••■■•••40441.41. .4 t• a1 1 A , - a 7 ' .! . i s .:: , ti. 0 6 < , , .. i i i limo -------/ - - - - _ I _ • - - I *.4 0**4 1 / in 0, g. - ..".•"•••*. .4.. W. AAA: V: W AP a P....AAA,* - I ,.. ' , ,, .. CO 01- LI.. " / P.O.P4MAMMOMP-W.V.We. - 'LI . • _ _ ii$1:::::::::::::;tagumii I A ,,,ti,:;4.: ,___ ______ _ . A SLAB /41, INA 1 ',.. ' 0 ° .....1 , , a < .. , , 7 ' 77 *:,, , 4 A A , 4 4: a r , I., , -44 .11;41,,7 " : ,'5rr ' ..:- ,"' - - . 7p 4 , -, -*-e...4„, W.,- It, ,2- A ,,V- ..„1- .:,,w,,,s7 Z-..■, ..--:-.‹ - ,..,.. ,_ _.__ _ . ..., -= , ,.. - ,.. , - - . .-... ,-.m.,,,,r -......; - „.„„,e.v..-.-t.,-A-., ..-,-- - ...._ - -, ,.-„ ,- ---- -,......„,i ...„----,.,- ---- .- ag --:- ....-.--,.-, 1 .„. ... ......-.-.1 -f-,.. -. .,..-.,........- .1v..-.- .,..4 "'" - ...................... . Z' _. ,.., ' -- A. , .%.,...ta- -; = -- 4.ri v i - -1-4.0t4,--..f.-.. 44 =0: „<-,-.414.=_.-A .1.-, =.=1', , i ,4, , tr-4,-, i.,-; -....i `„,1-.4 - =KL.'1 - :... %. Ea a_ ,.. .4. -..'ft ,..4.--r'Y'-..tx-v4 frii..A.F.A.:4 .....44.---- .. ...,......*-4,7.- w z...-.8.4fatt.. ..i ..,..-v-, ...*.,,c.„. , ---...*„.0-- - . -^..„...ut..,-..,.**.ast --,,,....... - --...0,„.....„- ----„.._.,e--4..... ... -4,,,,_.,.:0.4.,..,--- .,-....ie. - ,.,,z.v., ...;....fpT ---f-ket•-•*-44 .. a , 4 '-' W 4" ,. .. a ' ' g I Ell U 1 , . . , , , Revisions . 1A I ; i . , - __.1 .7.. - , i , S FOUNDATION - SEE -------------..-11 , .: ., , STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. - ‘ , ',. ` - _ .•'; -..-,' 1 , ,_ .. ' r ...,. .,.,.. ,,„.,. 1 : ! t r NOTE : ... ,.. f. BUILDING SIGNAGE D AWNINGS 4 , TO BE PROVIDED Bs OWNER AND , ., ,- t „ '.., . ,. INSTALLED BY SIGN ,GE CONTRACTOR. s : :,. . ' .. SIGNAGE CONTRACT R TO COORD , INATE , ., t - t , - EXACT SIZE AND A OUNT OF SIGNAGE . .1,. . ,„ ,f , ALLOWED WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES _ - i f. FOR FINAL SIGNAGEI LAYOUT. z. __............__.........1 , 7 /4 ,...„..... ,,..... ...- ..,.............-. ... -...-.= •.--.--.- - - 7 -.- - - -- - - , .. , -77' 47 4.4-4.4.4..444 4 4 4...4.4 4 4.4■ i ■ , ''.... .... - .-' - - - 7.7 --7 -7 1 , . .- , .,, 1 - SIDE ELEVATION ... _ ... ..: .,. ._,, ... -.: , _ . , : ,.._ .., , = - SCALE: 1 /4" =1 ' -0" - 111111111111ln - . , _ . . . . _ . , . . ._ , . . - .- DESCRIPTION , - ',- , TAG . , ------- '. _ SHIELY MASONRY PRODUCTS: ROCK FACE BLO K, BLOCK COLOR #P- El i; 1 7 1 I MORTAR TO MA BLOCK COLOR , . • ,... _ . 4. PARTNER CAN USE READING ROCK FORMULA T AT MUST BE APPROVED '. t O. e • 0 1 FIRST COURSE DF ROCK FACE BLOCK PAINTED 0 '- , 4, ... ,,',, •,.- - ,., - - ; =. ' .. .. _ V/ c ;. I 1 A ALUMINUM STOFEFRONT FRAMING w/BLACK ANIDIZED FINISH 0 ti -I 1 1 2 .-: . E3 I : 0 • V ; EQUAL LENGTH fe'l : Ct) 0 cn j 1 , 4 1 '" * - , , s. -, . .1-1 / q = . / ALUMINUM TRIM PIECE w/BLACK ANODIZED FINI I 2 1 1.! 2Ll o : A: - COPING SECTIONS ". . • 3 :tei 6 , - I METAL COPING REFINiSHED OR PAINTED 00 ,1 rl 0 I r VI p p ril ri T '1 :- . 7 1 ---------"------,, c.J. C.J. i I/PARAPET :,.. o.. " - *. . ;: •&4• ''' ' > 17*,: r7i V. V e,0.7 * , 44. :4.'-‘ , --e :*-W-& - , - .,,..t , ....A,VV W.t,*...0W A7- Acie :- ' , = :k.! -----.' 4 P-4 1 , ..... i Ai' F ,.. Age-Tri,* - ...-; - '4 - 4- 2' .,.."; l '" . -neftlifigiMITAIM,5 0 S0,-: , Wedt.1- 7: ' ‘!-" 7 '-gr',._ - .- .., - , - - fait ' lk 7 -Pr4 ..,. - „,i'V.,..;;_sz*-Uk.4"e 44 '2,01",4‘ -,.. .1 ---MElE4..'=: EL 16'-11 fir ,....... , I V) . EXTERIOR INSU AT1ON FINISH SYSTEM (E.I.F S.) L . I WALL MOUNTED SECURITY 5A w/SANDPEBBLE TEXTURE I ONT. BACKER ROD 1 _ LIGHT FIXTURE _I . E.I.F.S. COMPATiBLE 1 COLOR TO BE tRYVIT #UT61 - . T - 3/4" 'r /1' .EALANT AS TO MANF. - .' _,, . T/PARAPET ap ■ PECS. E.I.F.S : COLOR TO BE DRYV1T #UT61-54-8-2-4 : '''' ' . : 58 -,... . sot ': - 'W.4 - r< .:- - 14„V-,..7.feb.:At" -- = - --- latX0Ste-.7`_-*?.if_AWV , . '' ,... --- -32.6 ;:.;,, - _.=2....; ‘`..,„,'''W ".,- ,....-.4V-- ' - ' 1 4 -... # 5B 01 •F 0 9 : ..- EL. lit-1 r, - : 0 AS FOLLOWS 11 Ar_11 3" LETTERS TO READ : _ ' f , ,o Iiir 21:e:1- 41::1 1- 1 1 1, - - 1 *IliF BOSTON MARK: \ 1 1 ; \ , .:, ,- 5C 1 E.I.F S : PAINTE1 : ,; . ... , I .-• A STREET ADDRE' S z SH1ELY CONTAC - : 1 -. B/AWNING . -...... _,4.--_ '..214. _ ..- -:_twa_ .i.-._....m....., .,-- 'n,,, , _.;:-...., r.4. -, l'A..,t , '.. .. ..,z- -,,,-.0.- --'•.. vt-w, - - J'e.: '-.• ' `...,:;-‘, ,S ,.. , $4.**;.,414,0 ,4W,:'''- le,... , ' ,..:WRAAV .. . 41, I ,.. " • 1 r • . • : 2 2 : 1 . 1 r'' 1 . 7' 1 _ ,_ I r IIIII I EL Er-0" . _ , ., ''' ::, 641 N\ ■ ,..-.' 1 i \ i PAINT DOOR & FRAME -----......sc-------°T\ .7, DOORBELL ........mr. - _ I \ 1 41111K / 1 . , , , ,,,,, g : , 0 1 IMF ri / \ 1/ i 0 SCORE DETAIL MATERIAL LEGEN D , ., -, d GAS METER PAINT P-3 111111 , - - _ _ - ' P 0 . , A .. , , Ti 1 A 1 0 ' - s - CAIE: - 3 %- .--TC - ti --------- ". ------------ ------- - - S'OALET - N - 0 - N E. / 4 ,, ; Fl--- \ I 9:11dA asimr \ gm ' ' IN% „ ,.,.. a 1 , _. 4 . ill 1■MI e la ,' -,- 1 MEW 11.111 .......- PAINTING ----- - ',-t t i , ,, ii. I „u x \ \ / II / IL_ __Will M.SONRY ALL AREAS MU T BE COMPLETELY DRY PRIOR 0 COATING. 4,, :.• - 1 i 4 ;-. '-, IsTr ac- - 4 1 \ / mai T SLAB „oi ' 1 .4 I • Eirli*Ill 41,, i ALL MASONRY URFACES RECEIVING PAINT ARE TO BE TREATED = 4. 6 , i , \ , I (-- a 1 EL 0 .: WITH 1 (ONE) OAT OF GLIDDEN BLOCK FILLE' #5317 AND - .4 / \ / 1- f , i „ 0, . : , .., , 7 : , / 0, I I 0 .,,l'V-r. -,,,,. , - -4%,41 , 1* - ,,, 41=6. .'V.6',Nte.,' 4`.er..a;`U- ,,,ek 4 - - "4 k:- ,- '44704 , - ...-- ?.. - .....e*". ...e.- -, '..",-4 ,, t4,--,s1„-: a- ......4. -z--1P-4%.- t ir ...It- \ , , _ 44 , M:4!... , ib-,- „7.,....,._ lErIkkg,k '4, s'_`.'4 1A.. , 2 (TWO) COATS GLIDDEN SPRED ACRYLIC LATE EXTERIOR „1 DRIVEWAY lo p. - '`- , , • ' VVVV ..t . - , - - - , MASONRY (Sc ST CCO PAINT (FLAT FINISH) GLID -ON FORMULA < 1 I..'" 0 INCOMING ELECTRICAL SCREEN WALL #3525 SERIES. COLORS TO BE AS SPECIFIED / . t I . - 7 , - I SERVICE PAINT i . 4 , t 11 P - 3 1---t .1 :, 1 . - L____1 _I C I killTAL ALL AREAS MAT BE COMPLETELY DRY PRIOR TO COATING. PING ALL MASONRY URFACES RECEIVING PAINT ARE TO BE TREATED . ;.- . - 4- .t i 0... FOUNDATION - SEE -- -------4 WITH 1 (ONE) , OAT OF GLIDDEN RUSTMASTER WHITE PRIMER #590 1 : Date , . , .. .c f , STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND 1 (ONE) •0AT ALKYL (FLAT FINISH) TANK AND STRUCTURAL 2 1 ENAMEL PAINT •5250 SERIES. COLORS TO BE .S SPECIFIED, -.:- 3 , Drawn By I .. -.- i 1 It I-NOTE I AG GLASS TYPE DESCRIPTI IN , -, i Checked By . .,.: ,.. , _ „,„ . ,.,. 1 , - 1 7. 11: RCT 1 := BUILDING SIGNAGE ND AWNINGS " 10 1 INSULATING LASS ; .., I , .: I issued By (BCD ., TO BE PROVIDED B OWNER AND :: z .. ?. INSTALLED BY SIG GE CONTRACTOR. ? ; ,. SIGNAGE CONTRACT R TO COORDINATE 1 - A EXACT SIZE AND A OUNT OF SIGNAGE 10 1" INSULATING LASS TEMPERED i' -:' Scale , :;• f , . ALLOWED WITH LOC L AUTHORITES , -!. : i , t , FOR FINAL SIGNAGE LAYOUT. ,, . ? .1 !..... J _ , t- ,.. t * Job No. , '- L lb 1 4" TEMPEREI GLASS - i .1 .. . ,__ mor - .7. ,.. , , 7 , i ' •-:. 295097 ,,,,, ___. _ .. _ .__ - ..._ ... . _ _ _ ,-- k - .. :,- I 2 : REAR ELEVATION is EXT ERIOR F INI S H NOTES RESUBMITTED FOR Sheet No. , . = 1 . -=.-: . . , . , , P. • = , k SCALE: NONE DESIGN REVIEW 2 / 27 9 5 ' .- A-5 , _ _.___ , . a ■ .... ... '',' “ l . .;'a,r ' W.;4,7M...k ' ' . M ; r WrX1,--MreZCZSta T},r, L , -Ir.''' ' ''. - 3 ' "... 7 r.16" . - 1 - ''' t-.P:S _ 2Y 4-4, 7 "..-, - -:-'-- -.--."- '-,,, _ ,%--aW4 - - %-. - - - ,. -:- Mir-,-". g - i - '-ft , - r --- - - "/.. ' ' - 410,X ,r,= "V-4'.... . - 4.-.4;"V - t. - 4 , - .04"' '7 •',7; - 1 ,, a ,4 4,1 ,- - - .,,.!' '4,1..... ' - lwl‘.44 , - 'R*, - -. -.-..4-wr4-"..ag4"-- ' • sW.......- --"%04- ' ' 1 '_ - '4"‘--S.- - - "-,-.."---' ' '''''*.- 4. ' • -; ''. V" - ,-- -'' '"-IR - -` , , r't ` GENERAL NOTES I. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS ® SIDEWALKS AS SHOWN OR AT 5' -O" O.G. (TYR) EXPANSION JOINTS ® 20' -0" O.G. (TYP) 2. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ALL IRRIGATION, PLANTING AND EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ANY WORK. 3. REFER TO ALL CIVIL PLANS FOR GRADE LOCATIONS LEARNING TREE k AND COORDINATE THEM WITH ALL LANDSCAPING, PYLON,' .1 DAY SCHOOL EXIST'G LIGHT � • , MONUMENT SIGNS AND CATCH BA5IN5. y�OOD FENCE L — __ — — POLE 4. ALL STAGING AREAS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE (TO REMAIN) - I , a • . ° • • • • ... 24 / - - r - x . � fiA „ x I -- -- - - ?r . - - ' - - ' -- - - ' I CONTRACTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION MANANGER 1.1' ENGROAGHEMENT- ; ' FOR BOSTON CHICKEN N.W. ,L.P. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 1 ` ' I o 1 1 ❑ � " P , LANDSCAPE b" MAPLE 18" FIR ; ' !!) 4 / / / 5. CONTRACTOR I5 RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING , - LAN DSCAPE S 8qd 56 00 W 366 (364 8° M APLE ?'I' • 'l , Li ALL EXISTING SIGNS, MAILBOXES, FENCES, LANDSCAPING, EGT.. I _ A , , // EXIST LIGHT 4 - a //tp / / Li TO AVOID DAMAGE DURING GONSTRUGTION. 1 6. NEITHER OWNER NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL ENFORCE SAFETY • T. L P 0 POLE f / �* / / MEASURES OR REGULATIONS .THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN , p o►� A� ; _ a � INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES AND SHALL BE O } , • / , ; ,' t l U EXISTING O ` �„ CLEAR BO SID ES OF R DRIVE) N II • SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE HOUSE - •) ; ' / ' �� ♦ � , '' , (� AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS i....1 I8 j ry / EXITING F•�NGE (VE W/ OWNER V �1 r AND REGULATIONS. e - a �. FOB DEMO ♦/� , U 1 �m ` / / ,f � / y / V ?. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL 0) STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL BUILDING CODES AND i- 9- I LANDSCAPE 4 1 1 REGULATIONS. O _ , l s / / i / IIDRI VE -THRU" U ' I / 4,... ,. ,' i ♦ / ,f /' V 8. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSIONS AND Pflidr*. / 1 { � CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOBSITE PRIOR TO O SIGN \� r / � ; ♦ / / � r / / 1--/ r EXECUTION OF ANY WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT - x , • �-� , ♦ ,i Z I z OF ANY DISCREPANCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE O - o• / / /..-1,/..A./ /' / O FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED DUE TO HIS FAILURE TO DO 50. - J O �_ ��/ `f"S� � ,/ , , w ry / 4 / ' / / O Q• GENERL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSIONS AND N v ' / ♦ / / O nn CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOBSITE PRIOR TO WOOD FENCE !): • • • • • • (� BICYCLE - T ..-7•• - - t �� / / 6 > 4 ,/ / _ O LL EXECUTION OF ANY WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT (TO REMAIN) I f11�H1 R �' _ / / y / / v' p OF ANT D15GREPANGY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON5 {BLE L.P. , / / - ,` l � FOR ALL G05T5 INCURRED DUE YO H15 FAILURE TO DO 50. CAI • ' •. ' I % NM - ' ' 6 o �' / � ��i / ' �/ O V Q V ` L.P • a' � m U 4 ` -� ", 18' 20' -I" �� a / / • i� ' / / L lit 4 20 -D 1 8 f I� t 15 24 18 I I 6 I • • �u ' t i : : : : ,' / / i ,,/ / / Revisions n•+ 0 7 . �' Pf V , 1 ,. l /SE D. / ' / , Y // / / • v ^ .. ; `, r ■ FLA GPOL E S , / / / / f' . . . f r{ t • L.P. r • �+ • � �� 1 / ♦ ' � � � / •• / / / • 1 ' ; , _ .- - .... j.,r• x p ,HICKEN . • _ ' ` f,`' 6 _ :�?� I 9 I e / PYLON SIGN 75 5.F. EA. SIDE 0 , { a ') "MENU BOARD" — I � � � • � ,�. :: I • �` � i } / . -- - ' (SEE PYLON SIGNAC�E SHT.) EXISTING i i ♦ SIGN �-+ �. �' / ' _ • ' ,;• HOUSE ;: Pi ;� / ' _ , i I d / LINE OF "EXISTING CURB'," - REMOVE ALL , n ,.� ' . . 0 - "PREVIEW BDS." . f-• �' lo° PINE k • / CURBS IN T 15 AREA ANA INSTALL NE • ._ • ..;� ' WOOD ' oo r LANDSCAPING (RE:CIVIL 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN) t- • -x x �l mar s L - �� ! � � _N Ai N v�Tu Q ��_X� v ,,____ ,/ EXISTING SIDEWALK (VERIFY) z. ,..:-', -, r 7 .-3 . .. ` -,r h F. 2.i ENGROAGHEIIENT q x � PO NOT ENTER" EXISTING FENCE VERIFY NV O �' , / / FOR DEMOL ITION) . SIGN IN+ I ? / y 5 y ; f , Architect Seal . r I 0 ■ . , &'" vi NEW SIDEWALK I / . . 81TE —� - , REMOVE "EX15T'G" 1" PINE i ANA F . T ��' 1 6; L.P• '� , / � V1.L' MO NTAIN I � �:.� - / Ilk 26 - _� / . r, ..�_ / / / / Ic ONLY r' I II 1 1�' LA NDSCAPE / / / / I r / SE. /MENT O SPIRAL INCREAS ING IN RADII�.:� N 8�i ,6 00 E 243.12 (2 " - ') f ; LANv3c,�.. _ .mac 7 a a /' / , / / � /_ IYj,�`�r' G i I II C 11 �.E _ -- — — — r , F F.:F T 26.G0. L_ 142 +3C�. 1 � a� / .J EXIST'6 LIGHT ; ; / ;/ , ' ; '✓ P.S., 5 = 01di5'. A = 0.40;, OVE RALL SIRAL LE Nc:.# ,-i = ' >t / PO / / / y-,/ / • 2 LONG CHORD SEGMENT = N 33d36'09" E, I5_•). '14' 0 f • ; _. -- __ — — — — --� , / // / CC NC.AVE WESTERLY. s VICINITY MAP -,1— ' / / / x a 1 / PROPOSED " NEW " • / ' ' ' ' . NTS PAINT STRIPPING . '� ' ' / / /' s / / ' ' ® �� KETPLAE , CHRISTIA /' / / / i / L, I'„ I , , / — ,� -- i ' sN MAR'. a ' ' / r I / �/ (, ,, ,/ a PROVIDING NEW LIGHT POLES EXISTING , 51GNAGE �' -- - - - -�� I / ■ �� �_ Z // THIS AREA TO BE RE- STRIPPED TO PROVIDE - 3 � ` r J 4 ' ' ' /// / , ' � ' _ 3 � i `� L -1- -- FINISH FLOOR • • • / i / i i / L PARKING AND A DRIVE LANE CONNECTION - $• , , \ � ;� • �.• •2 - w ��' I • / / / ONTO GAARDE ST. EXISTING ENTRANCE TO - - ' \ - ; a : ° I / / , / ' / ' ; ' REMAIN THE SAME. _ `� ` 'I `6 / ; / / / °- IT': k oA - e �- -- ---� , I I • . / / / / % % i % / / / 0 / / • ;� a /� / / ' % L • 1 , / / . � , � � X• • MAPLE • "��G LANE / /' r' / ' • \ ,'�'�'� N VIDEO PACIFIC pRODUGTS MUST 11 Fit'I6HT" / / / , V '1‘ t t 4:9, V I • / / / SITE DATA EXISTING PAINT `� - -- J � / / / , / 4 5" FIR STRIPPI -- - - -- — — — ....... J // / ' • ' ' >; • I / ' / SITE AREA : 56,574 S.F. 1�� am WALL "CUSTOMER -- ` 6 • ( r b TREE x • / / ' / ' / ' / ' a '' I PARKING -•2' , , ' / 1111' rPI BUILDING AREA 3,361 S.F. I NO THRU EXISTING • / / / / / ' ' '•;; +'1 =` ENTRANCE e � IG" 1 1 1 , I 1 BUSINESS a , i /' ' / ' , : / ^ I I ` ' • \ 1 r l BOUQUETS • / • PARK 'G REQUIRED • (1/200 S.F.)-BLDG 16 SPACES ; � , + II 4 a `, % % �, , , I I FLORIST • • / - -- A � - - -- (1 PER (2) EMPLOYEES.)-EMPL 12 SPACES 1 k I I - 1• NcRE__ Sib \ TOTAL PARK 'G REQUIRED 28 SPACES ;r� \ � �z `• ��' I ' • PARK'G PROVIDED • 56 SPACES �';� : ^I • �� "'z II . s • a ' k s • a j • + /� � v' 4 ' • • HANDICAPPED PROVIDED • 3 SPACES 4 - • 'CHRISTIAN i / / <` �„ ' �''`� -- - -- - - -Ti------__ O REMAIN) TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED • 59 SPACES . , , �'., • ^ _ ; " ° `; • — — / YPDG 50/%18A" N A M I N IIT ENT S` `' ' '' ,, = 'a'ST - — ' _-____ / �� _ ___ -+ / BOX MARKED "05HD" Date ASSOCIATES, �7.q1' - _'- ---- 168 20' - ; ; ; - _ — _ S ,� , .� _ . /' - % - - PARKING RATI A; C.11 I'T E CI' S'a P.C.. 1 0 / / } 17.55 SPACES / 1 X00 S.F. S.F Drawn B r , b - _ SITE COVERAGE • • 5.94 % , N.W.' ` AVENUE `� // _ 1 --� i � Pdan 4R 97209 /' ' LANDSCAP3= COVERAGE : (18,506 S.F.) 32.71 % Checked By ' �', (503) 228.0666 _ ' • � `�` - / BICYCLE RACKS (1/ PRK'G SPACES) 4 REQ'D. "Nr FAX (5 228 382 t / Issued By (BGI) k f 1, / R T Scale a ° ,• 20,_0. rt t a , ,. :.. S ITE PLAN • ` y .Job No. . . / ���� , ti � �k ��� Sheet No. . .1 , 4 , : 4- � ',- ' r e - ' e" a4 .., r I 4b / . D Kis I - - _ " yY - > . £ f s GENERAL NOTES / V) • A ALL THE WORK SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND • OAY SCHOOL S � ' 00 " { _ W i THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DO - ±�-- - - / ALL INCIDENTAL WORK CONSIDERED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE - A. - -- - -- - j 3 � . - (364.* ') /' L-----------:':',,, C� L - PROJECT IN AN ACCEPTABLE MANNER. CC __ __S _ �.__ _ _ _ . , j -' -� __ _ _ _ __ _ __-___ - -- — �-- - ' ----) / r^ x �w= �"'. Jl - +" "�` { , �4r E < , 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, I : z • , //� 2 2 S "FR PROPOSED BOSTON CHICKEN STORE, PREPARED BY GEOENGINEERS DATED x ' -- - -- • AUGUST 8,1994 AND COMPLY WITH THE REPORTS RECOMENDATIONS. 7 .� " �` >p VIP �tFV, �� — � t sr �� � 273 • , 3 CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE, VERIFY, CONNECT AND/OR MATCH EXISTING / ' r ' > s o • '� p (.) - 0 . , _ ' a / IMPROVEMENTS, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE PLANS t�ousF 269 95 ° `''� Qo - � a4 , , - - / Z AND SPECIFICATIONS. _____ \ 2 0 Z °� N 1 � Q w 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT `4 , d' p p �`� O , ?�i 1 / r?� 14 _ _. .-•d • 1 - . . • r , < Niu EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING o p / \� -J2 ., FACILITIES OR IMPROVEMENTS RESULTING FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S ' d i tv co 2 2 - / A� l' U OPERATION SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS o ° . ? / ... — -. 15 _ „ EXPENSE. A '?j GRADE - BR, : K itio 4d ' U 5 DURING .THE COURSE OF THE WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE / , • ----- ° - 3 - 0 ,r__ 7 AND ACCOMMODATE OTHER CONTRACTORS, OPERATIONS OF THE OWNER AND ; a / ? � � j 3 0p ' �A 1 f x 3 8 � ` J � ��A i LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. 9 Z ca •�• PO.RT ? � � ~x � '` f .f ! iT 6 S ' _____________:„,,„ , , 6 �°iry QED O / , � t ® F �► : ' ti• Q��lv ° f . 6 g • j., rb , �/1• {� : , . • i ' ' , _ 1 / ti ,� ..,.,-,,; ' r() 7 ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE --��' , 0 2 - • ' { { Z� N � _ ----- o Q WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING AND PLUMBING �. � , � ' i " : ' ^ �`° N� CODE AND CITY OF TIGARD STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. o � � : ; f - ' ' � . c' F 0 76 N TO STRAIGHT LINE GRADED BETWEEN SPOT 0 + ' ✓ - ' i 8 ALL FINISH GROUND O BE S G LIE E _ 3 1 1� R / ^ �'���' Revisio iii ELEVATIONS. - • b, \ $,, r r: • / QPOSE� J N / / / / ,/ s A[ ^ ATCH E XIS NG 9 ALL PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE TO FINISH PAVEMENT ry o� CHICK / �f ; f - ti l/ / / ? ' \ 12/9/ „..., , GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ' ' �-- ~ '. 3 361 S F r __ �h c n _ _ j , ,,,,_) / F.F.E. = 27 q 1 , . I v . 4v,i 1”, • 5• • fro)_ W000 , x,,53 N • rn � 2 CONSTRUCTION NOTES FENCE , , , 2 /.0 ° � T► - visham..,�• Ir. �- _ _ �-;ry 273,3 •,�� ss j)// / / I , el •� V .- 1. PREPARATION: ��� 27 2.72 o / r l i i i r� .. 1 rNE . / . ,- - � N 6 A GRA BR• A K _" ` IN BUILDING AND PAVEMENT AREAS, _ `,� .�r COMPACT THE UPPER 12 INCHES OF � � ' Lo � v - T zo, a' ti SUBGRADE TO A DRY DENSITY OF 95% OF THE MODIFIED PROCTOR / ? )4 1r2f . 1I' , ` % ->, r', e 2 - - �r '�'' t �' � ' MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (AASHTO T -180). I -�_ ✓ 1 `L'� 1 t � � 27 ' e'6+ 2� ?" I EXCAVATE SOFT AREAS OF SUBGRADE WHICH DO NOT ACHIEVE THE 1 A Z.• ' ? ? ? � �' �'->� 9� �f a ,� c, ��.p PROF ?- rI' 2 / ?, WALE `� t r 4f COMPACTION STANDARDS. BACKFILL WI 1H CRUSHED ROCK OR OTHER �� ? : 't ry1 S et , _ _ S L ____ o p � L NG NEF� . /� APPROVED FILL AND COMPACT TO 95q OF THE MODIFIED PROCTOR �-� 2� �� g• ,� _(:-=',' 4 4 - s �'' • i . ., - -- - MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (AASHTO T -180). --_- _ : - _ . � -OLE #s a2 1 / 24 PRIOR jgLqjtEIALS COMPACT r _ 273� 6 y . _ Z � O N a AND FIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (AASHTO T -180). ..„,,--,:. HAVE SOILS ENGINEER APPROVE SUBGRADE COMPACTION PRIOR TO ��, i 1 21 4 l �' '� ---- ---__ . -- e� _ _te '-- P - - — • PLACEMENT OF ANY ALL MATERIALS, NOTIFY SOILS ENGINEER A - ------ -- ----- -: , C}C) r, E I� ,ti ~`"- - ~ Q � / Y Y MINIMUM OF FOUR WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO SUBGRADE OPERATJDNS. —_ _ __ , f , N 1 - J � - , , � r � . �� - T £ - F 1 10 IA i 2. STRUCTURAL FILL: - �_ �- _ - - _ s I � (.2 "It _...— vi IMPORTED GRANULAR FILL WITH SUFFICIENT BINDER TO FORMA FIRM `I �, - ; f T --•--- -. .oIa UNELDING SUBGRADE UNDER COMPACON NON - EXPAN FREE OF r �. 4' ' ; N ArE =275 2t? t Ki MAR ETPLACE /!/ CLAY. _ ^ -.__ . ; • j �__ LE +) / ` %� // ' ON SITE SOIL OR SOIL ROCK MIXTURE FREE OF ORGANIC MATERIAL AND , , 14 3 I! 4 '' ! 3 DEBRIS FOR USE AS STRUCTURAL FILL ONLY WHEN WI THIN +29' OF , , , /a � 1 > OP TIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. AERATE TO WATER CONTENT AS ` , /� � a ° g a , t w i~ NECESSARY. - — , . - _ 1 ` Fi;ltSii FLOGR g lEs: R � f C{ P,'F STf v' , 1 _ a EL - 279.3 4+ Z WJ NT E ' •I L h' 1 _ /� ` t7 d ON SITE CLAY SOILS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE, AND SHALL BE REMOVED / / // - - = ° Q a a.' , h FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED A T A LEGAL DISPOSAL SI TE. /// / , - �A a A . A 1 . 0.s C i A / 7//- �/ \ , '� . R EVE EXISTING WITH NEW AC PA M l�� ° � N SEASON, FILL MATERIALS SHALL CONSIST OF GRANULAR MATERIALS. / - � , SHOULD GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OCCUR DURING WET / � � r R LACE VE ,f ,� , , i 2 2 7HICK ALL EDGES - ALL / ° ' / IMPORTED FILL REQUIRED SHALL BE IMPORTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT / / / / �, BE SAWCUT, TA - -'— Bo _� ___._ - t Hl XP N AN AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE O WNER. ' r - ---�__ i , SA SEALED 35 �' S E ESE D / / ,% / \ l� _ ,/ A4 \ f / i / 1 PACIFIC NW / a 4 R �Nr LA,h1E :11 3. PAVEMEN 1:• j / ,� ` _ __ _ _ ,� ,f ;sr TURN i, r" CRUSHED ROCK: BASE ROCK MATERIAL SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF f / / � 1 � T ' - — r N � r � 'EO FRCiOUC J � \ a T - -9 8' 0 0 SECTION 02630 WITH ADD! TIONAL REQUIREMENTS THAT THE ' 1 / / °s SH / P / 4 CRUSHED ROCK CONTAIN LESS THAT 5 PERCENT NON - PLASTIC ROCK / -, FINES SOIL PASSING THE NQ, 200 MESH SCREEN BY WET SIEVE � f , co ' , - ACC£SS EASEI T v ,' s {SE) _�7a _. ( � / � � -�� ✓�� lvc n�a � � t � ,.� � jE ( ��� -� � . ANALYSIS)• BASE ROCK SHALL BE 1- 1/2" -0" AND 3/4" -0" MATERIAL 'C,4 T�IL9'•'� CORNE �" F% cu�a �2 9 • � a __ `` 24 I ' ' SCALE TO THE COMPACTION THICKNESS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 1" RAMP � 1 (, N O . : -- F ' DOr' y� • 6� �� �l I `�, //IJj}f�� / � / / r Ct,s Tl - - - 6 ? ' � v ' ,,r' s, 1V 4. : - -.L 9963. ,� `'' �, � z0 0 f0 20 4a �i: + 1 i: ASPHALT CONCRETE MATERIALS: MEET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF / ,ANC , a ' • R EMOVE EXIST. AC - - --- ' � rd I �h'U ' MI t♦ ^ f� PAVEMENT IMTNIN a ` �,. OSHO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 00745 - ASPHALT CONCRETEL ;L-t, , �. ` • ° �; �s;�+�s5 , PAVEMENT, . ASPHALT CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS C STANDARD DUTY. �' It SLAND. s; ( FEET) .,; " '� 1 1 D C�U Qt E rS / , k ° " r .r��° �0 , - -- "� FLGR1 ST i `' �� �" P � 1 inch = 20 ft. ( ASPHALT TACK COAT: GRADE CSS 1 MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF OSHO ~- - v a ~ -� +.rF�i • CK COA r AND „61 1 ,! i , F { v \ : : STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 00730. .' • • .` 4 •� 'st I �� a , ` - -`` ��� \ CITY STAN � � i , __ 4 �� !' • � ::—;1----- _ -� r ' °a _ _ ' w--- , / ---" i _ 4# �� i _^ RECEIVED V i' � !( .' APPROVED. KILLER: POLI'BOR CHLORATE CHLOROX 40 BY CHIPMAN CO., OR L � ° o s ° �� { � . �, • T -� � P RlVA1 -'DAD '�i r _ N� �. ENTJ`�ANCE SAWCUT --Z . - -=.• ` " _. � ' Lam:: - �� �)() 4. SIDEWALKS &CURBS: _ _ -. x r e � D EC 1 t ' MIX AND DELIVER CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE W! TH ASTM C94. PROVIDE S. _ �� A i ' `" 1 C. 4, " _ Lj CONCRETE kill TN THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS: � _ "`-- -- L 1. 1 - FND 5/8 IR 1MTH A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.. - _ ». `- __ -- -_ �S/ ; . Y PC IN A MONUMENT D CI t e . - CON CRETE: '____ S ,r J F _ I " -�---- �.�..._ --- - • - -__ __ _._ _ _ _ _._..____ ..%/ �' '` BOX MARKED-- _ " O SHD" UNIT MEASUREMENT T N _ -`¢ `� T - ��� - ,�� ^� 3 2 10/12/94 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (28 DAY) 3000 PSI (20.7 MPA) CITY STANDARD CORNER _ -~ o rs� o " .. Ci ,, • �� . • y - -� - Drown By ` MINIMUM CEMENT CONTENT 5 SACKS PER CUBIC YARD WHEELCHAIR RAMP t ra, DCB � •.31 �;� ///// Checked By MAXIMUM WATER /CEMENT RA170 0.45 MA TCH EXISTING w)= 272.Si M" - -`-' • MAXIMUM SLUMP AT FIATWORK 3 INCH (75 MM PAVEMEN SECTION � , r�� MAXIMUM SLUMP AT ELSEWHERE 4 INCH (too MM) ` '-` �-�_ DC . SURFACE OF SIDEWALKS SHALL BE BROOM FINISH. �� --�� � �"- �� Issued Issued- By � (BCI) _ , �� - Scale - .: �'-- -_ Job No. . , .. . . 840 S.$. N .(BUS ENUE P.O, . :A. 0 44 I WIT PORTLAND, OEEGOi AV 97'280 ' • Sheet No.- -- ,`` ;. ( 503) 623 -0455 :, s.. _ r P41411:1-4 '_�' Bn4ineerin4 • Surveyinj • La�decape Arehitecty{re C ---- 1 '''.--''''' r _ ., - x . - STANDARD MANHOLE OVER • • EXIST. 8" SANITARY SEWER - -- - -- - -' ` __ ,__� - EXIST. 8" I.E. OUT =249.10 CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN _� - - -- 8" I.E. lN- 249.30 GRATE- 26 9, 92 GRa TE- 271.24 GRATE= 271.84 , 18 L.F. 6" SD 18 L.F. 6 SD -I8 , (.1) • 0 S =590 (MIN.) 0 S =5X (MIN.) 1 / . "_S= % N•) _ ___________ ) GENERAL NOTES - __._s - _ _ _ _ _- " _ _ NDE w_ _ ------ - - -_- --- -- `� -_ - =_ -_ _ t ' i '� - ` ' � �- _ _ _ RIM 222.oD -__� _ _ - �-- .- ''`' - r ,______1 ,______1 , .�_ 1 . \\ __ il ------- S' 1 GREA E� 1' • !� � '� < - -tHT =26.7' - 1 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DO ALL THE WORK SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND I S E'SH T. P -1 & P \ ;//\ (1) N � � r D � � � . 1 n I.E. / _ ,____ _ i ALL INCIDENTAL WORK CONSIDERED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE r t ,� . cV " _ Z PROJECT IN AN ACCEPTABLE MANNER. OUTFACE W /RIF -RAP 1 } _ - 6 l.E. OUT = 269.80 > 1 - Q 10' 45' BEND t ; 4 �' ��� RIM= 273.12 �� Z , . �.L� z ` 2 SITEWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CLOSELY WITH THE BUILDING 10" I.E. =266.10 I x �'='��'':. • SD ..__ _.__,,. SD SD CONTRACTOR AND REVIEW ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS 1 1 L.F. 10' SD 5 =0.852 , 89 L.F. 6" SD 0 5= 2. 02.4 CL�FANOUT ''" c TO ASSURE ALL UTILITY SERVICE LOCATIONS ARE COMPATIBLE AND DO _ , 1 I � � / S 1. E = 268.90 /// 1� / U 1, - l / '� n J _ ® I NOT CONFLICT WITH STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, INCLUDING FOUNDATIONS. �' 1 % • i ® �� . S0 L.F 6 SAN .42 L.F. 6 ► RIM= 272.47 " it / ■ j I z '' l `S • 6'4. 6'4. S 3 CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE GEOTECHNICAL 2901' ®S= 7.590 l , i - T HNICAL INVESTIGATION I 1 / N f _ � i __--- ( I U EC PROPOSED BOSTON CHICKEN STORE, PREPARED BY GEOENGINEERS DATED / �. AUGUST 8,1994 AND COMPLY WITH THE REPORTS RECOMENDATIONS. 6 F. 6 SAN . / MAiLec: ;X' U z 4 IZ CAT H ASINi t I / ! SS O O " S o , " 14° IA Z � _ C� CLEANOUT' LE .= - 1�Q0 �� / j / O _J GRATE= 6 8.1 ' ' RIM - 2Z .8 ::: 5:32L V E NT € cn i NT c b 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE, VERIFY, CONNECT AND /OR MATCH EXISTING " - / / / � W y 30 L.F. S,� " 9 CABAST , SH T. P- / / / ` / / O U UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE INT O 6 I. Es- 266.50 f THESE PLANS AND SP TO PROV COMPLETE AND 1 3 , ' / GR 72 � �� !'� � -' _ - -- - - - �� __ s 26Z 30 per �r�r . r / (/) o _ - OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS. ( ! m --- _ -_ - / f - " ' / 2� 6 " SD T ` �' • , 75 L F SO - - - ��° � � � / _1 5 CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT g x / --� �' ; � r .°:- : o ®728Z 0 � EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING __�%� 1 M1 / \ /// // / / Y W (� F RESULTING FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S / ^ / - : , I /// FACILITIES OR IMPROVEMENTS RESUL ' OPERATION SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S f I 3.8 L. 6 SAN{ t l - __ S 39 MIN % Revisions • - EXPENSE. = ! / ° ` ( x ) Pc R R OP � D : a 5' , \ . / 1 ' ' , 6 CONTRACR SHACOORNATE DITCH LET f ! / ' 2/9/94 AND ACCOMMODATE OTHER CONTRACTORS, OPERATINS ! / f r' 6 S : ; : V1:' �•Y - • 4" I.E.= 271.20 / L/ // ' V + =1.4 '. ' 1 . / / /fir �c . , \� =0. • 4 / / \ • X .� \ t // / 7 REFE RENCE ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCA ARCHITECTU PLANS F OR I z: f �� /,� ,.._ r .•.•:.:::..":::•.:.::::::::::-::•.::::::„...:.....,:..:....:.:.::::: 0 ��GAS ETER 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND COORDINATION R EQU IREME NTS. �j • 8 ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE FE E - I -C � i '' � � ;� .r, - > > t� 2" DO CHECK L , f WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND / i / � / _ I ! i _ � VAL = ' VAULT / 1 CITY OF TIGARD STANDARDS & REQUIREMENTS. � 1 1 ; fi SD ®S =6 19 0 / �` ' 62 L.i 1 , A TE R •• • ✓ r s s f E= 271.0 1 • o I / / `'� � _ -----1 � �•�► - ��RI :�N METER( , 1 �° , �� ®• -r y 1 ____J �; -, . 7 ti -CON TINUA rip � / i �,,� 1` CL ANOU T . 6" I -268. -0 � � II � , � /� �Pr ti= ,.f,° _} t _- RI = 273.14 \ . i i -7, : " /; f- - ,, CLEA OUT ,' tom- 0 �% 2" WA" l SERVICE eY / i / ____ - - -- -_. _ _ __ . __ _----- ___ -- _ _ _ -- � f o j � >� r ;' 0 6 1. , = 268.77 CI T 0 TI GARD /� T PRO , �� RIM 272.25 %s /4 1 .11 , h INL 1NG ME ,,A ����D e SS / / , ' / �a --- � _ 1 Ac �� , r 24-(4. 9 � /�, .; -__ ____ - - ?_ 7 , CA BASIN - - I r / , OREGON f f� ,� , /c�a - _ _ -- _ _ �� j \ / GRATE 271.96 , t Al � / //� / - _� -- = =_� 27 _ r 5 L .F " SD - / � ; •� � //// /� c .' / j / '4/-t° }yX 3.193 ? �- 10 L.F. 12 -- f > - - ` __ - -- �� / ' x �x / / �� 0" l - . _ __ - ti / / / �' MAR 0 S =1.67 / j; i - 1" � _ _ a - F ' -� - - ` - -- ____ ---�� !� J.�- - ' _ =-= , � „- � � .. - ///2/ � - - -- - _ _ -' - - �_ -- / / LY ?(- /7 ( .9) / 3 r- f a / // t // N i,// 1 . . :' / � - GrRA TE -?_ 73. „� C� 0 f j ;, � �` - �- � - - - ?7/ .3 ,A 1 ,,, i AN LE ► // f- p ° ct l / ! ' � , ` / 41 RIMme -_274: - !` 1 l� ',,/ I T, =33 4 ' / / CONSTRUCTION NOTES • , / / ' •. f _- -- - _ _ __ 1 Q__ I.E. IN =262 RArE 27r$ 7 o i /j / ' / ! A _ �2' . OUT= % 2.�7E ? /J' - ` � / / / \ '1 1 Y :■ / f. WATER SERVICE: r__ / tX {3 / / / SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C506; PROVIDE DOUBLE CHECK VALVE, WATTS L O C A LE A CONNEC / / ///// // f T EXI S ' 1~. ' ' A/N T \✓ , / ) 709. FEBCO 8Q5Y, OR HERSEY MODEL 2. , ' / / ! / f ------/ ( Lz: 1 2 /. . �r/ / / / ce • PIPE ASTM 01785, PVC, SCHEDULE 40, TYPE 1, GRADE , / / >/ 4„/VA � ! r / „ / i • A TM 0 2466, PVC, SCHEDULE 40, T1PE 1, GRADE 1. ' / / / FITTINGS. S i • r " t / ,' / \ /� _ _ _ / A FITTINGS SHALL BE FORM MOLDED OF THE SAME MATERIAL TYPE AS P VC / i ; ' -� r ^ r /' / - r / ; , , -- -- - - -___ J , ' / PIPE MANUFACTURER. , / : , , / / ,/ _ \ 1 4 PLASTIC PIPE JOINT PRIMER CEMENT SHALL BE AS RECOMMENDED BY / f / /f j �! -_ v _ �' -- - �- / PIPE MANUFACTURER. ' ON 0 k _ 2. SANITARY SEWER PIP y l f / / / // E i - �' , -- - '" � � / PVC PIPE AND Fl TNGS: CONFORM TO A S TM 4' - -- '' _ /- `- Q � j // / \ \ / / 0 o POLY VINYL CHLORIDE ( ) �/ % ) � _ 1 , � , i \ c' '� f / o 03034, SDR 35. ALL CRAW TY SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL HAVE /r /, �' , �� �` - , --�� - - --- 1 -- - i A r - •=278 GASKETED JOINTS, i --- - / / 8' ' (SE) //, .3 / � f yi / / ! SCAL E POLY VINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE JOINTS: JOINTS FOR GRAVITY SEWER r / / / , / / T , / ! t. � PIPE'SHALL BE RUBBER GASKETED TYPE COMPLYING IN ALL RESPECTS TO ! '� / f .l 0 ~ � � � f r ' 20 0 10 20 40 / THE PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM D1869. / / �� j �` ` ► I r �� , , al ' 1,, -44 r 3. STORM SEWER PIPE: �, f / ( � '� �� + PVC PIPE: ASTM 03034, SDR 35, RUBBER - �. -3 _ ` � -- �' - 1 inch = 20 tt �' ' ` , � !d � POLYVINYL CHLORIDE ( ) i - __- / .� -, 4 , GASKETS, PUSH -ON JOINTS. -,1'_, _ _ / ,� ` _ so CORRU POLYETHYLENE PIPE AASHTO M -294 ;P / ` f� ``` = � - -__ �cw i ___ L - - - - -- - ' - � _ = s �� =` `/ , ' "' , a �^� ,-_ DRAWING; GA SKE lED JOINTS. _ __ -_ _-____ Y _ - 4. RAIN DRAIN PIPE °` ~~ �. - �' `� /�� / � / : 41) \ PLASTIC PIPE ANSI /ASTM 02751, ACRYLONI TRICE- BUTADIENE, C+ . , <- ,/ � . ` / 1 / STYRENE (ABS) MATERIAL; INSIDE NOMINAL DIAMETER AS SHOWN ON �� �� ✓� - , _ `� / r DRAWINGS; BELL AND SPIGOT STYLE SOLVENT SEALED END JOINTS. _ t1 Y r� -_ - 1 -, - ;/ Date D � . � ` L ` -` 1 _- _ -. --� -- - - __ - - -2� 'i 10/12/94 POLNYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE. ASTM 03034, SDR 35, RUBBER 17 91 ,Ea 20 ` l f 7 i4 , _ I' _ _ r __ T_____________ GASKETS, PUSH -ON JOINTS. __ �� ___. _ _r_ _ t - - - -! - ;? - - - - - -- ___�.__ - -- - - - -- - -' - �_.__ __ _ __--__ _ ,� , �� /,,ai4 f Drawn By a DCB - G RA ; E =,776 31 / 5. TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFlLL ---- _____._ ___ �._. - �____ / // • PLACE MATERIALS PER TRENCH DETAIL AS SHOWN ON PLANS. COMPACT 6 lE (W) -272 51 - �� Checked By -- _ _ _ 12" , E (5) =272 61 / / BACKFlLL AS NOTED PER AASHTO T -180. - 4" !E / / - - _ _ - -- \ r Scale . - _ -`- / Job No. WMPACIFIC ,, --_______ \ -N\ ,. - - - 8405 S.N. NIMBUS AVENUE , , .i., • P.O. BOX 80040 . - - - -- - . PORTLAND, OREGON 97280 Sheet No. a (503) 626 -0455 ' ; Planning •. Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture C ---- 2 , . - ` oo STANDARD CAST IRON __ F FRAME & COVER ........11 °o STANDARD FRAME STANDARD M.H. RUNGS °p A.C. OR FINISH GRADE WATERTIGHT PIPE PLUG ' A & COVER 12" O.C. LOCATED ON co - . \ . MANHOLE, THIN 24' -41- �.,- -, S IDEWALK GROUT FINISH OF COVER AND FLOOR OF 4-1/2" X 6 =12' FLOW GRADE °o jj TE 2' QU BLOCK ' WI AOR - E E 3 MIN. CLS BS "'.:1'.6...".•,.......z 2 `ti `�' — '~• j ' ',� 2 '' • I '' SPI 6" z r� ry , ARUNLE 6 ' • 1/2" OR : OTHER APPROVED N MATERIAL. " �. F 4 6 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 6 ' � • CONCRETE , t — PLAN 5/8" 4" CONCRETE EXTENSION RING U) ENCASEMENT •'� INSTALL AS REQUIRED TO BRING W • • CO NCRETE TO BE p p OC 3500 psi, 1 -1 /2 MANHOLE COVER & FRAME TO Q • • # . c • ' . _.• 40 t1/2" GUTTER DESIGN GRADE - MAX. 3 RINGS IL 2 TO 4" SLUMP. 0 04 � 4 o 4 OR 12" MAX. Z Q MAIN SIZE AS SHOWN i, N P 4 � -zrr W (3 •r • e s FLOW + b' \ \ f/ `/ i/r `'� T `"`k ECCENTRIC MANHOLE TOP oil- - 1' - 4 1/2" RAMP TEXTURE DETAIL SECTION A —A U (ii ' alA I f ter * �`� a b ® Q BOTTOM • GENERAL NOTES: 0 CLEAN OUT 1 OF DI TCW 1, - -- RAMP TEXTURE /S TO BE DONE WITH AN EXPANDED METAL GRATE PLACED AND REMOVED STANDARD 48' MANHOLE RISERS Z N. T.S. _ FROM WET CONCRETE TO LEAVE A DIAMOND PATTERN AS SHOWN. THE LONG AXIS OF THE 2 O C 3 PER PLAN DIAMOND SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CURB. GROOVES SHALL BE 1/8" DEEP AND Z U W ( PER PLAN 1/2" WIDE (TEXTURED SURFACES SHALL BE LIGHTLY BROOMED AFTER CONCRETE HAS CURED). -v O 1 1 0 2 - -- SIDEWALK RAMP SLOPES MAY BE REDUCED TO 1:8 WHEN MODIFYING EXISTING FACILITIES. O 2' PVM'T FINISHED 2' PVM'T 0.1. BEND 4" Q 0 Q TAPER GRADE TAPER 3. - -- SIDEWALK RAMP DETAILS ARE BASED ON ORS 443.310. RAM -NEK JOINT MATERIAL OR CU) Q. 0 i_ • 18 EQUAL - ALT. GROUT ® 3 1 1 CO vi p 0 !I ���u��u D.I. NO = HANDIC RAMP DETAIL 3 . 12 " Revisions � HUB BEND . - � 6' TYP, 6 " MAX. 41111111111111 , 4 i Ei ALTERNATE 6 "MIN -' ' - : fi" 6' 2' -3 3 8 6 "-- N.T.S. C -3/ 1F T: SLOPE MIN .� - CONNECTION 6 / / DRILL /2 DIA. . / ' DETAIL / e 3 -3 1/8 - - — � —# 8" BELOW RIM. � CLEANOUT ...1 FLEXIBLE 5 MIN. r �� i • „ - . ' � OUPUNG A S SECTION E E SECTION F— F D 18 FLEXIBLE REQUIRED — - - - i * - COUPLING ��— �—' LYNCH TYPE 11 %lc D.l. PIP TEE 2% 1 6 MIN. CATCH BASIN - -4 r SPOOL ar . • ` • . R a Z z ,, t' ' _ , W128" SQUARE • t ___, _ , ( . « a :a f 1�3L1'tr +?.9�' �5!fr"r 1F V n , : � - c,-__ 1 GRATE APPRO 0-4 .OR t , F,;, a EQUAL) �� Y. A.* DITCH INLET L E T 2 4' MIN. 3/4"- 9= P IPE Z ONE AND - AL ALTERNATE FOR N . T. S . 3/4"-a" A COMPACTED 0q GRAVEL C.R. COMPACTED 2' - 0 » C - -- 2" OF 3/4 - 0" 6x6x10x10 W.W.F. BEDDING BACKFILL MATERIAL CONNECTION SQUARE AS SPECIFIED DETAIL COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: N OTES: _ �D PROF 1. C SHALL BE 3000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS, 6 SACK MIX, SL RANGE OF 1 1/2" TO 3" 2 FORM AND MAKE SURFACE SMOOTH TO 28 RECT FLOW. t � Z .4 / -.v f F� � 0 t � q 2. PANELS TO B 5 FEET LONG / t 6/ / 'I 3. E X PA NSIO N JOIN TO B E PLACED AT SIDES O DRIVEW APP ROACHES, UTILITY VAULTS, MANHOLE DE ¢ OREGON l CATCH BASIN 5 WHEE RAMPS AND A T SPACING NOT TO EXCEED 45 FEE 3, �`� \\ .N. N. T. C -3 N R MAR N. T - C -3 2'R ff 2'R 4. FOR SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO THE CURB AND POURED AT THE SAME TIME AS THE CURB, _ i THE JOINT BETWEEN THEM SHALL BE A TROWELED JOINT WI TH A MIN. 1/2" RADIUS. �' !Z- I/'g4- ..'�_ - -` - - - UNPAVED PAVED A -_ L 1. AREAS AREAS ' 'CONCRETE SIDEWALK C 7 6' SIDEWALK - MOUND N. T. S. . —3 SLOPE 12:1 FACE OF CURB , _ VAULT WITH BOLT DOWN • 0 1/4 -:1' H - ' 6 1 /8' SLOPE 70 FRONT 2" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE COVER MARKED W 1N LI * THE WORD "WA TER" a. LI g . .� � .' • 1" RADIUS 1/2" RADIUS o SELECT �. FINISH GRADE � 1 " NOTE: `I�` �. F + � -= 11111111111111111111 \\11ll\H11\\\1111�1\ 1111 \\11\\\1111t111111111\111\11\ 111111111\1 \1 11111 \1111ll1111111\1 - ,1° , .: a te ` " '° ' '' W NATIVE 24" SELECT GRANULAR I 1 �r x :# / �., ' to RAMP TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3000 P.S.I., . _. BACK - • FlLL ® 9590 r r ' � % N :: BACKFILL 1/2" TO 3" SLUMP CONCRETE 6" THICK.` x� ,� � %- - Li WO VARIES, SELECT GRANULAR R .. � *V1 � BACKFILL 90% DENSITY < '. 3/4 " - -o„ —"•-- ai. ,. E. SECTION A —A PARKING 1 N . j ' ! 12" MINIMUM I t ii• r0 r • . 1 � SELECT • , ' . ` . .. GA LVANIZED UNION Crs GRANULAR , • �% - j I MATERIAL i RAMP DETAIL 6 24 LONG 4 DOWEL BARS AIT 2 y : . 1 CLASS 200 P VC , • DENSITY I? EXPANSION JOINTS, GREASE �' ' • ' 4 MINIMUM T RASE PV PIPE . " .\\ - N. T .S . C -3 ONE END • a ' l i l t � . ; j PIPE ID iI / TxS SCH. 40 PVC , ' ., ,, h �- -ii ,I° , yy�� + 18 4 Z COUPLING ;' ; I �%�i '' ; ,'+ I !1 1 1 111 1 TRENCH DETAIL 8 BASE COURSE -\ ` • 4 g A ; -1 , r '''' — " r - - ' � N T.S. C 3 �` �' � � � � 4 �� ,, g t � � '• , � � }. .. � � j,( • GALV. NIPPLE . 9 " \ '', !i ::141 u' � !I IN_ tifi • . \- In • 1, CONCRETE TO HAVE A BREAKING STRENGTH OF 3000 P.S.I. AFTER 28 DAYS. 2 -1/2" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE 3' / • .l 2 , EXPANSION JOINTS_ Dote - 2" 3/4 " -0" CRUSHED AGGREGATE STORM DRA l N N A. TO BE PROVIDED: (LEVELING COURSE) -, { ' 1, AT EACH! POINT OF TANGENCY OF THE CURB. DOUBLE CHECK VALVE C2 PEA GRAVEL 10/12/94 , -, , -), 2. AT EACH! COLD JOINT. — - ,, -- - ;c_, -- ' ' 3. AT EACH! SIDE OF INLET STRUCTURES. N. T.S. C 3 Drawn By - r 18" THICK 4. AT EACH! END OF DRIVEWAYS. DCB . i f. /.i�..'.► '. ./.r"1i". .t., ,V./..r, . 6" THICK 3/4 " -0 I • ►( CLASS 50 5. AT LOCA170NS NECESSARY TO OMIT SPACING TO 45 FEET. Checked By �+!� VAR 1 ES RIP --RAP B. MATERIAL TO BE PRE-MOWED, ASPHALT IMPREGNATED, NON- EXTRUDING, DCB �� . � � CRUSHED ROCK - ,� WITH A THICKNESS OF 1/2 INCH. II ' .# VIV I ssued By (BCI) 3. CONTRACTION JOINTS o /,�� � �� A. SPACING � J MORE SHALL BE AT LEAST 1 1 2 INCHES. Scale 0 0 COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6" 1, 1/2 " -O" CRUSHED AGGREGATE B. THE DE O! / N,T,S. o ti OR FILL TO 95% DRY DENSITY (BASE COURSE) 4 . BASE R OCK - 3/41' -0; 95% COMPAC17ON. �w o — Job No. n PAVEMENT DETAIL 9 OUTFALL TFALL DETAIL C STA NDARD CURB » " 6 N.T.S. C -3 N.T.S. 3 N.T.S. Z 'C C -3 PORTLAND0 AVENUE 97280 Sheet No. ' Q (503 828 -0455 W Z P lanning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture C 3 ,. ,..., • -:,------_—• cicz, , , MIMI .- JT - EROSION CONTROL PLAN ECP NOTES ___-- — — �__ — —� ___-- 00 1. THIS DRAWING IS FOR GENERAL GUIDANCE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL - 7 i 1 1: V / - � - co MEET ALL C I TY OF T I GARD EROS I ON /SED I MEN T CONTROL REQU I REMEN TS / , 7 2. BEFORE STARTING ANY STREET OR DRA 1 NAGE CSTRUCT ! ON WORK, ALL - - -- - -- - =-- -- 0 -- I r - -- � PERIMETER SEDIMENT FENCING SHALL BE !NSTALLED. FOLLOWED BY THE \ � ` " - -- X - ---- �- 1` -- <% ON THIS PLAN. 3. METHOD OF INSTALLATION FOR SEDIMENT FENCE SHALL _ 2 ji •• � DAMAGE TO VEGETATED SLOPE EXCEPT AT POINT OF INSTALLATION. L■■�■�'_ '` �� -`' S I DECAST MATERIAL ALL BE TO THE UPH SID OF THE DIMENT ( 7 i - -- - - -- z ®- N I NLET INLET INLE _ - --- �- _ _ �,'� \ . BARRIER ` ADJACENT TREES ANY EXPOSED GROUND BELOW THE •SEDIMENT FENCE ' ' BA R� 1 � 81 ,� / Z SHALL 8E SEEDED AND COVERED W 1 TH STRAW MULCH TO PREVENT '� � / f EROS1ON. TEMPORARY GROUND COVER SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL . _ , Z / ' 27 �� /' /r z A HEAL THY STAND OF GRASS HAS BEEN ESTABL I SHED. ! r / f ONCE EXCAVATION AND GRAD l NG HAVE BEGUN, ALL DRA 1 NAGS FROM SED 11 ENT � ` ' r\„ � ' / + + THE CONSTRUCT I ON S I TE MUST BE ROUTED TO THE I NLET STRUCTURES. FENCE i - / / / GRAVEL �+ rf Z TA 1 l M N T F I T 1 - w CARE MUST BE TAKEN AT ALL T 1 MES TO MAIN N SED E ENCES . / CONSTRUC ON / . , , 0 '� / M 4 f / AND STRUCTURES SUCH THAT NO UNTREATED WATER REACHES THE 's 1 _ -- l � � " ENTRANC 'l 't•• 2V ADJACENT WATER FEATURE. /i �/ i t tit r :i t i .. / (n • � 5. ALL EROS 1 ON CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE EXAM I NED AND REPA 1 RED AFTER NLET - ,t• . +� • • / 7 � �t f EACH STORM OCCURRENCE, AND I NLETS SHALL BE CLEANED OF SED I MENT :AR13aER ; j• ' / / = Q z .' • => • ;i�;r WHENEVER NECESSARY. +t. +�• +t. +:. . • +t. + t• •t• +t• •1• •..� — I x � / /� •r .t ; .t .. . . •t; •t; •L: •r; •., ,/ -, •i :l t v it :t t :i t t t 6. STRAW BALES SHALL BE STOCKPILED ON SI TE FOR IMMEDIATE ACCESS 1N CASE n r ' J - ; ,. �, r; t;t; t;..r.` L � , r f `� + t• 1 . •z• +z. • +! Z Fi -- r R f r r - .4 -{ e e a i x , - . x ate._ F -: me s€, . �. rF • - 8 EROSION AND SLOW SHEET RUNOFF FROM THE STREET, l , A - - --x W BUT ARE NOT INTENDED j N Bi � � J _ _ J AS A TREATMENT METHOD FOR WATER GOING TO THE WATER FEATURE. 1 / I �t E1 /� ! t ce I / ! t : pi ♦ / l / �r r t \ y q l/ v STANDARD NOTES FOR SED ! MEN T FENCES i , 1 . opI . : / - I I. A IN A TIN S RO L CUT TO THE • Z1 ^ J I;VL!!.: a/ / / / Revisons THE F1 LTER FABRIC SHALL BE PURCH SED CON UOU L I � 1 � f I � �' •. _ r _ - � � �� LENGTH OF THE BARRIER• TO AVO1 D USE OF JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE NECESSARY, i r i �' , � , = .� f / ; / / F1 L TER CLOTH SHALL BE SPLICED TOTHER ONLY A T A SUPPORT POST, W 1 TH A ,� . I ` �.?.� is ; ' • ,,) c rj \ i> ! 2/9/94 M 1 N I MUM 6- I NCH OVERLAP, AND BOTH ENDS SECURELY FASTENED TO THE POST. I I NLET \ , : r� :: ; ;_ , • f f l BARB I \ 1 ==� , " ' I • I% t i / L . .i'•; ! ter—_ _ / 2. THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE 1NSTALLED TO FOLLOW THE CONTOURS ► I I / WHERE FEASIBLE. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED UPSLOPE AND ADJACENT i • - 1 -- li , 1 • �: + / ' TO THE WOOD POST TO ALLOW THE FILTER FABR TO BE BURIED. Tx ' • N \ 2 ' ' V ; T r - ' ' � �/ / / r 1 / + ! y _ }_ - j �� ' I f ,L_ ___ _� �/ / !� SHALL / f _ EXTEND INTO THE TRENCH A M 1 N 1 MUM OF 4 1 NCHES AND SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE / 1 % ; r r' f + , / THAN 36 !NCHES ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. / V 21� I r f, 1 INLET f 273 _ �i �� % �� _ H / / BARR 1 E � ` r / // 4. STANDARD STRENGTH F I L T R FABR I SHALL STAPLED W 1 R TO THE - --�� / i / / THE D DS E E C LLBES LE DOR ED E � _ / FENCE EXTENDED INTO THE TRENCH. THE FABR SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 36 I NCHES /.1i4//://1 I / / 1 7 ? �- 1 / d T / , ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. FILTER F FABRIC SHALL NOT BE STAPLED TO ` -. , : 72 \��'�- - - -_ , / / i \ / / ' / / / A , f _ ,, r 1 0 J EX 1ST 1 NG TREES. / _ ; • / / / c cs a PROF 5. WHEN EXTRA- STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC AND CLOSER POST SPACING ARE USED, � � 1 C 21 - _______ __ter ` // �,/ / / •\ ``� 2 a'� 9 THE W 1 RE MESH SUPPORT FENCE MAY BE EL 1 M I NA TED. I N SUCH A CASE, THE F L TER 4 r ' ;7 f / i 7 EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED ___ REPA 1 RS SHALL BE MADE I M MED 1 A TEL Y. _ -- ' ¢ J f i / ` / / rz -3r— �,. , ,. fi l / _ ' f_ // / , / / / I l7 / r //// / 1 { EROSION CONTROL PLAN DOP 1NLET z • [ 'I I TH GRATE Ce w A NOTES: a FILTER o! o ' 2 " X2 " X 1 4 GA FABRIC I. INSTALLATION SHALL FOLLOW THE • WIRE FABRIC MATER 1 AL MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDA T 1 ONS. in - w OR EQUIVALENT 2. POSTS SHALL BE 1 NSTALLED SO - N ♦ ' THAT A M I N. OF 2' - 6" EXTENDS .- •- ABOVE THE GROUND W I TH A M 1 N. OF STAKES (2 "x2 "x3 ") S -..`_ I I 2' - 6" EMBEDMENT. _ _ „ „ " i j\ ' ' o CA \/./ <\ \ < \/. r \ I N — CU N. � ` \- FILTER FABRIC t I ;\�j'\� 12" M I N. BURY FOR FABR I C :::1L , \ ..>\,/,N` i /// . ® -- -® ` PLAN got t e , i �I f r PROFILE VIEW FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL 36" WIDE ROLLS USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO STAKE , 'II' - -'-i) ATTACH BR ! C FILTER FABRIC A FA • 'Ill' �, STAPLED TO \ _ b Cty F �, + if {�� „ T; STAKES , � I ) T 1 r „ REINFORCIN• _; + • •� • WIR ” I R C i' ;P - R - NETTING IF, • 'I • €_s II ; E B RUNOFF WATER O -__ _ o o BY MF . , gg `� ET OS N i r FILT WATER 4 ; j �,� Date m : h _ E , \ 5 0 Q G 10/12/94 - V \ ` \ �� ' �� �;:�� \' \ � \� \'���'� �� >! e s ir "�' E P QR ' .. ° Drawn By I B BOTTOM OF F I L TER MA TER I ' V _.._ - ° LLJ w IN 8 BY 12 TRENCH (i o 1 11/ x ' _ — , Che By ° `t a DGB 2 "X2" WOOD POSTS STANDARD BURIED FILTE' RAD. = 5' MIN. Issued By (BCI) OR BETTER OR EQUAL FABRIC SECT. "A" - "A" O ALTERNATE: STEEL FENCE POSTS ,� CLEAN P 1 T RUN OR 2" M 1 NUS GRAVE W I DTH AS SHOWN o (M I N. 4 DEPTH) • M 3 ON PLANS Scale 0 q SUBGRADE REINFORCEMENT 8 " M i N. • 0 0 GEO AS REQU I RED DEPTH ' _ ' rn V BURY I N NATIVE GROUN 1' 20 0 1- LI ' �� SECTION A -A Job No. 1- t . 8405 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE z W SED 1 MENT FENCE DETA 1 L F1 LTER FABR IC I NLET BARR I E'© GRAVEL CONSTRUCT I ON ENTRANCE 3 PORT 97280 Sheet No. w Z _ 4 N N. T.S. . .. N. T.S. C _ 4 N.T.S. C 4 (503) 626-0455 O W C J Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture ---- , , 0, G: . ` GEN ERAL. NOTES , , i • • I. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS 6 SIDEWALKS AS SHOWN OR AT • 5'-O" O.G. (TYP.) EXPANSION JOINTS * 20' -O" O.G. (TYR) - -- . ' - . 2. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ALL IRRIGATION, PLANTING AND. ` ' t EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ANY WORK. 1 ' ' LEARNi,NG TREE ' 9, REFER TO ALL CIVIL PLANS FOR GRADE LOCATION DAY / AND COORDINATE THEM • WITH ALL LANDSCAPING, PYLON/ - �) , EX15T'G LIGH / MONUMENT SIGNS AND CATCH BASINS. - - �` - - WO OD FENCE L __ ._. — — _ _ • ` POLE • 4. ALL STAGING AREAS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE (TO REMAIN) e a - `:. - o- A, • CONSTRUCTION MANANGEI2 I•I ENGROAGHEMENT ' 1 - — _ �' CONTRACTOR AND THE _ — — — — _ — FOR BOSTON CHICKEN N.W. ,L.P. PR10R T A NY CONSTRUCTION. _ — , x )1 — -- x - - — — — �� , ' , r / 5. CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING -1 ■ F____._ I S Bad 56' 0Q 1N 366.25' (364.80') ❑ 6 MAPLE FIR / _ 1 -k / ' / ALL EXISTING SIGNS, MAILBOXES; FENCES, LANDSCAPING, EGY.. LANDSCAPE 8 MAPLE LANDSCAPE /04 - j TO AVOID DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. _ - ' / ry EXISVG LIGHT -w / / � d - - - N POLE / l00) A / / /� V 6. - NEITHER OWNER NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL ENFORCE SAFETY MEASURES OR REGULATIONS . THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN , r 0 I • TRASH • LP- A � � ', ` O lik A i / ,' f r,;' , AI = , , EX ISTING ` O INSTALL AND' MNTAIN "ALL SAFETY DEVICES AND SHALL BE / ♦ /, SOLE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE CLEAR VISfON ZCNE ' ' / �� HOUSE N B OTH SIDES OF DRIVE /7., / r �� / 8 ( ) / " EXI f� TiNG F�iGE (1/E R�I�'f W/ OWNER AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS �- _ / FOR DEMOTTIOI,U h 10 AND REGULATIONS. - �, X f , 7. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL . . STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL BUILDING CODES AND i - 0 1 LANDSCAPE . ' ` +' } REGULATIONS. b' ' " ; . / ' J - - 6 , .: } • / / i ♦ i / / ` ' 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSIONS AND O i! DRIVE -THRU / / , ' ' � ,4 / 4 / # ` / CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOBSITI= PRIOR TO 0 SIGN - �'� / � �9 ' r o� / 0 )-- EXECUTION OF ANY WORK r ♦ /i / ,., x „ �S ' 4 3 p, / < , ; p ft i J . _ iNi Ii J'S 0 ' ' / ', ' , O 4i • 9. GE NERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSI AND _ N ) /' d ' b �/ // • y ,si O w nn . ' CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOBSITE PRIOR TO N OOD FEN ∎ . • - • . • . . • . !� � / / �1- EXECUTION OF ANY WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY. THE ARC HITECT (TO REMAIN) 1 .4 BICYCLE . — N �tp a // // 6 7., / � // ', p OF ANT DISCREPANCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE fl&IH1 u RACK T ' L.P. s / / , ' / / "' o FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED DUE TO HIS FAILURE TO DO 50. Biwa _ r%j ❑ a / / 4 / / it - -1 i 8 2O — I \ .. / / • • ♦ / 9 i / 1-x-1 - 1- V 1 20 O I8 8 i2 6' ►5 24' 18 II 6 , / ♦ /, / , , • I �1 . _ , - 1 f Z. e� ■ F LAGPOLES / / '� ° / ' .. ■ A L.P. V ( / % / • • t` i s _ . _ ,, • , . X CKEN 1 \ " _ .� 9 , z i } / PYLON SIGN - 15 5.F. EA SIDE 'r I F • V " MENU BOASIY '�' I . N / / (SEE PYLON SIGNAGE SHT) • 5, EXISTING � SIGN :` • LINE OF EXISTING CURBS REMOVE ALL - _ _ HOU p ]} ��!�} E - ..z . VU: l _ ; �e " to P�NI= / URBS IN TH15 AREA AND INSTAL NEW `� N PREVIEW BDS. G Y 4 h LANDSCAPING ( CIVIL 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN) . , FENC7 - f / , _ • - s v u n - j EXI I IG MO SIGN `, LANDSCAPE � l . EXISTING T ARD MOTORS" y • z� _,) .,0 -- Mil I I�, ' 0� lI LA*tDSGAPE / = 1:.' f= °f t `4 TI R �x� - • • r,—z __. �_w • _ _ / EXISTING SIDEWALK (VERIFY) 1 - , • a • 9 . . _ _ � ° 2.2' ENGROACHEMENT —*-1 " DO NOT ENTER" • _ i � / "EXISTING FENCE" (VERIFY W/ OWNER Y 't r ;; SI t'p F / _ 3 ' e / FOR DEMOLITIOH) , , • Y H = NEW SIDEWALK / Architect Seal �r SITE — �=► • REMOVE EXISTG ? PI N �,�x j i T. �-- vE , � / " E ' O A \ L.P. # / b 8})I.fi: MOUNTAIN A � 0 • ° ' \ \\\ / � / / / /- : - SPIRAL CURVE D ATA : _ ONLY 4 N 89d 56 00 E 243.12 (286.60') ❑ LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE / / / / / SEGMENT OF OFFS SPIRA I NGREAS I NG I N RADIUS -- –, — — — / r / = + — –. — — — -- — / / / . / / SOUTHERLY, INSIDE OFFSET 26.00. L5 142 30.44 �� #- EX1Sr'G L` IGHT / / / • / P.S., 5 = oldl5', A = 0.40„ OVERALL S IRAL LENGTH = , . 4 ; - POLE • / / ,' /' // 250.00', L ONG CHO RD SEGMENT = N 33d36'09 E, 158 .94 ' , � d - ; � -- -x / /' ' / GONGAI/E WESTERLY. ' C VICINITY MAP r r • , PROPOSED "NEW" f e / / , ' , NTS / �� PAINT S TRIP PING /' ;' / /r // / / / ' \/ ' L, P, . / / _ _ GHRISTt/AN , / / 1 / EXISTING ; ` - \ __ � ___ _ MARKETPLACE 9 ' - ,/ , ; ' � // , / 1.1 PROVIDING NEW LIGHT POLES , THIS AREA TO BE RE- STRIPPED TO PROVIDE , s ' r , / / //1 / , / > ::: PARKING AND A DRIVE LANE CONNECTION - - -- - - -= `'�`�. + �`�.� L _J_. - F{N{SH FLOc?R' . . i : ' / / / / p , / / U \ 5 - \ \� a l e E l. . =279 81' /' ♦ ' v ' ' - -- •. ONTO GAARDE ST, EXISTING ENTRANCE TO ` ' ,� 1, _ e : .. ■ , .' / Q % REMAIN THE SAME. _ `, ` ti .,4-- .. - .I I - � - / , /� // /` ' -` - % 4_ I i - - i , 1 . . / / 0 / . ,// I/ , . . : 1 J k 11 - _ MAPLE - ' o • 1 PACIFIC NW ` VIDEO PROMOTE V .› % , % • , 8 / / / • / I / . EXISTING PAINT _ a s � / /' / /r , " SITE DATA 4 5 F I R STRAPPING - - - - -- , ._ __. _ 4%., i / / / , • / / . WALL "CUSTOMER -- ' N s, j f. 1 .'- .- / SITE AREA • 56,574 S.F. — lig ' PARKING ' " / / / , / ;:�a� ,,, 1 ''''''t/ . ',, NO THR ' EXIST - N. 1 _ p l I b TREE . , / / / / , BUIL AREA • 3,361 S. ; ; `" I �� `� a / / / / / au ''in'�' r a a • —` H TRAFFIC" � ENTRANCE \ I BU54N1 =55 4 a i /' / , i•1 ' , - < • , , 1 1 Tg PARK 'G REQUIRED • (1/200 S.F.)–BLDG 16 SPACES I�.^ ;l�, * ' • - . - _ 4 , A - ti < < r FL OR{ST _ 1-i ' r l ' � � � ` ti ' ____ -- (1 PER (2) EMPLOYEES.) – EMPL 12 SPACES I r�1 II 1 ',�;I I ` ` i % I I j 28 SPACES ACES - L TO TAL PARK 'G REQUIRED P 1, IMP -- _ - — — � �� .. ,� .•�' PARK'G PROVIDED = 56 SPACES J ,, �� ''dr ` HANDICAPPED PROVIDED . 3 SPACES =' "CHRISTIAN • / / / IIII) " ' 8 N NE s - __ __ _ - PT O' "�I TO TAL P ARKING P 59 S an 5 (� h �— ��__ —' , >> , FM) 5 /B" IR WITH A _' ?' STAN — — 1 % // YPG IN A MONUMENT e • . �(, �y�) "- y � r �__,�_ / / BOX MARKED "0 51 - 0" Date e + - ° tik:y . � V � -T - I -I{' ^-- je-5 20' f , , )'� . . - \ , A I 1 T . 1 8, P. �' - r a — — — % — —' �, PARKING RATIO : . ... 10 / 17.55 SPACES / 1 S.F. Draw B y -' 10 N W TeNTH AVENUE: -: 1 _ _ - _. r _ , . -, ,_ _. sum a0. — 4 , ' SITE COVERAGE 5.94 / , ' - _ ' LANDSCA - COVERAGE 18 546 .F. 32.71 % che� ,e ' .J PORT..AND 0R 972 / S ) '� ' r / BICYCLE _ RACKS : (1/15 PRK'G SPACES) 4 REQ'D. , (503/228.0.668 . ' . , ` � I m (03 ' 228- 82t4 , --------- - - - - -- - . . . . .. _ , ] , Issued By (8C1) "V , . 4 `c .. $ t - I _ - `\ J - - /: R T Scale . .. . - , .. . , i . _ _ . SI TE PLAN ±ob No - - . . 0 - 0 . Y �, Sheet No , , ., . DR I , , .- - - -- - _�.,.,,r. - . , • 063 ALUMINUM FABRICATED D/F CABINET_ BLACK RETAINER / PAINT GLOSS BLACK - INTERNALLY I LLUM- M. 2x6 ORANGE BORDER INATED WITH SOO A. H.O. LAMPS • - ! r 2059 RED BACKGROUND 11-1 < 7 '\ A LL,O�IED EACH 5I17E �O S.F. MAX. BLACK OUTLINE AND DROPSHADE AROUND COPY V , _ PER CITY COl7 _ WHITE COPY 0 --05 i .. OPAQUE WHITE BLACK RETAINER V t ` 2564 ORANGE ORDER TOTAL G I0 `�.F. , ` �''.A B 203q RED BORDER AND LINES \ ' , BLACK BACKGROUND O W Z R K _: ®/ WHI AG COPY ((�� O TE " ' p v .400.... • O< , r • OPAQUE WHITE C� I. Q Revisions y 0 F, GO,O. 1:7E mil , zo ER31° IT SS IE ER 11 EE ) . ,, -.. __.. 4 Z‘ii - .0 1 r- ff:COC:), o _ Architect Seal 4 BLACK s -'∎ • • y ORANGE 110 A V 0 WHITE EMBOSSED COPY WITH BLACK OUTLINE (°BOSTON" - tn .150 FORMED AND EMBOSSED LEXAN al t FACES WITH SECOND SURFACE PAINTED GRAPHICS RED l� 4 O I - ORANGE v - _ _ BLACK ------ a , W OPAQUE WHITE DEBO5SED BACKGROUND R. BLACK 1 * ORANGE r BLACK GAPSULS 111 j ( , Z WHITE EMBOSSED COPY ("ROTISSERIE") Q 4 ry - BLACK GAPSUL 1 ORANGE --------- • .'. BLACK • 10.'15" DIA. STD. STEEL PIPE OPAQUE WHITE DEBOSSED BACKGROUND PAINT GLOSS BLACK BLACK • - ORANGE / _, , • RED 1 I�II IA IIt l f , WHITE EMBOSSED DOPY WITH BLACK OUTLINE ( "CHICKEN ") 14! �` RED +�, 1� � i 1 - -�� r I„,� f OANGE j q j — � ' ;& 1 !: BLACK 4 i 11.1: U.L.LAEELSS _ IIiII . E L =\/.ATIO N I' IN STALL IN AGGORDANG ill NATIONAL EL GT. GORES l ___, , ._-.A - 1N5TA S E G T I I `� _ -_„ .,_,-,_ x Date = 3'_ DIA. X 12' DEEP GONG. PIER rOUNDATION 4 - 1 (TYPICAL FAGS SECTION) Drawn By _ { j . r Checked By • Issued By (BCI) TYP. - LON - SIGNAGE �F , j Scale , 0 pYi 1 u : t 20 T�J' :. Job No k Sheet No DK- 4 , , ., 4 s -k I I 1 -- . .. . _ a.. ...: . 5_ -- -. .. .. • � +_. S n. .... ..: -. - � -.. ......_ -. -.. .. .. .. .. ,. ... ,. .... -.- .. r ry i s .. , F � �. �• .J - _- _.. - n _ -.. '.. _ ,. . - _ n _c - � .,. - ._ .., . s... _.?-b -.. � .. w _ C ENRL. NOTES _ ' • 1. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS ® 51 DEWALKS AS SHOW,, OR AT • 5' -O" O.G. (TYP) EXPANSION JOINTS 0 20' -O" O G. (TYP) _ ., _ . -•_ _ - 2. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ALL IRRIGATION, PLANTING AND 65' -O" HG Rx. C ONTROL 6 SPACES = b2' -5" _` ' -�" _ 5 SPACES = 52' -(" , • 16' -2" 6 SPACES 0, 62' -5" EXISTING LANDSCAPE GONDITIONS PRIOR TO ANY WORK. - , , 33' -8" , y 3. REFER TO ALL CIVIL PLANS FOR GRADE LOCATIONS LEARNINO TREE - - . AND COORDINATE THEM WITH ALL LANDSCAPI PYLOW I DAY SC - - MONUMEN S IGNS AND CATCH BA51N5. �XlST'C3 LIGHT _ TYP.: - 4, : . - // WOOD FENCE L -. - -: _ . _ _ - . �. - • - - _ _ - LE PO (RE: ELECT) 6 ANGLE 4. ALL STAGING AREAS TO BE COORDINATED WITH# THE • (TO REMAIN) e ° % CONTRACTOR AND THE CONSTRUCTION �GER 1.�' ENGROAGHEM " t ' ■ FOR BOSTON CHIC KEN N W. ,L.P. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. _ -- - - x--- - • - - • ._ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - ° / ,� - >) \ \ S 8qd 56' 00" W 366.25 3 •• 4 80' a cr A A PE � - - --- ; , 5. CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REM-AC x . .' { - 's� L ©° % / ''� /i f ALL EXISTING SIGNS, MAILBOXES, FENCES, LANDSCAPING, EGT.. `A "DSGAPE = v - _ ■ / • TO AVOID DAMAGE DURING GO NSTRUGTI ON. {� I / / - - - - I 1 \ - EXIST LIGHT e / / o� 6. NEITHE OWNER NOR THE ARCHITECT WILL E NFORCE SAFIrTY - / \ I I POLE (RE: ELECT) i AA // % / / M EASURE S OR REGULATIONS . THE CONT RACTOR SHALL DESIGN , ( , �1 A 6 . ', - . r i,, , ,,,... : ,,,, , ,,, ,, ® a i i /` , , ,, • . INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES AND SHALL BE O . + ' / , , ,, W EXISTING O IO / / SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE HOUSE is, CLEAR VISION ZONE , Q , y ,, - AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS - �. / �2- P��` � , ) , , `'� (f30TH SIDES OF DRIVE). EXITING FGE (VER��'f W/ OWNER AND REGULATIONS, , - r " / `s BIC RACK - A - i i \ `� �d , . % �' - -� ¢ { a ry . F9 0. DEMO TICK) -- � 7. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL. CONFORM WITH • _ M r -' -6° 32' -4" �, /' / 9 ,i / STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL BUILDING CODES AND 2-. - I i / RA PU P - _ - F / / / ` „ , REGULATIONS. d' _ 1 / \ (RE:G ' ,y --' - -- ---•. - b , - , . 0 .- �- .Z' , , d /' �q�/� . ` / 0 Z V . GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSIONS AND , ' O in ,- � - - ,,h s , . _' o 4 ' ' T YP. -' ' \ i' y ' / 4 / ' ( ,j� C I CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOBSITE PRIOR TO 0 / / 1.,� , ����,�, �q- ' ' • nip AMEN, ¢. `� • � + , ° a - �/ "* / a * / / / / Se al EXECUTION OF ANY WORK, AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT - x DR IV THRV O _ / v , 1 Ada Ala � ° ' U OF ANY DISCREPANCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE O � 51Gt�4 - / TARAV-. ., , � . '� 3 0 . ` .. / / �1 r ,i / i • FOR ALL G05T5 INCURRED DUE TO H15 FAILURE TO DO 50. O / i �� ° r I ���� �Ulllllllll `� ' s o , %- i Z 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE DIMENSIONS AND _ I / 6 ; `�� , ' ei I STOP } ' /� ; • / / y // / / 0I ca Q CONDITIONS ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE JOB5ITE PRIOR TO E I '' �� / ® ' / / / / / / • EXECUTION OF ANY W ORK, A ND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT (TO R I 1 ''P J �A Q ''' Pio �� • _� / I �p \ // , .� s , �, / , / / / / U 0 (� OF ANT DISCREPANCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE o J11N0 `� t � i� 1 „ , / ,, LL FOR ALL G05T5 INCURRED DUE TO H15 FAILURE TO DO SO. ma-u. ma-u. 11 �� �� 1 I® •° , / ,, . , v I �1vHC] n � � I� h1 O / U) 10. VERIFY ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING ON THE 517E PRIOR 4 Q v Q• • . _ / ,� 0 Q ❑ L.P. M ®... U) . TO ANY GRADING TO BE DONE. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE I ' ,Q � , i • `� ° ° / / / /I /' / . PLANS FOR ALL NEW P L ANTINGS AND VERIFICATION q R= 28" Igo 20'� �w a , ,' /' / ,; / / - OF KEEPING ANY EXISTING TREES SHRUBS OR FLOWERS. - o'- f 18' 8' 12'. b' ;5' 24' _ i8' - 13' -1 ,}� �f ' / a '' / ' • TIONAL LENGTH ON ELECTRICAL POLE BASES 4.. / / a ,� / ' I D Y i I A ••• t�ROP 0161 C a ,/ / AT B!O- SWALES AND SLOPED LANDSCAPE AREAS (VERIFY) L .P. ' Q - n � �► FLAGPOLES 4. .1 / / p % / / ; ' / H. PROVIDE ADDI., - REFER TO CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DOG 5 FOR ADD L INFO. x 1 • 'r -' 5P2 -T� . . 1 ' l i -6" ` I w . . • . i Q I V: C i - i 1 i�E i V ; (RE: d /5P -2) 9 / , o w �; } , , - ' } • 4 , / PYLON 51GN - 15 S.F. EA. SIDE i2, VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF MENU BOARD, PREVIEW I ,I 361: S ., ' 4 $ ° . ' ) • BOARDS ILLUMINATED DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND DRIVE -THRV V / / (SEE PYLON 51 GNAGE 5HT �- EXISTING ' ' ' SIGNS PRIOR TO RUNNING ANY SLEEVES OR CONDUITS. VERIFY HOUSE 2 �• 0 �• f \ ` K • I z BA E ��- - - __,4__ � v �' .�. "G `# `�O � � � ' , ' / ' LINE OF "EXISTING CURBS" REMOVE AL WITH A BOSTON CHICKEN REP. FOR ALL THESE LOCATIONS WOOD I I 1 /sP_3 , . P z � � � © w a• / CURBS }N TH15 AREA AND INSTALL NEW CURBS di • ice/ , , : ; / I ; a I' `� , io • • - � I � ' � � � / L A NDS CAPIN G NE: LANDSCAP PLAN) PENC ROUND TOP , . - x x J ‘� • •�� � r LANDSCAPE ' �� / I _ e - r 11111111111 BOLLARDS TO } - � EXISTING "TIGARD MOTORS / / � ill": ". SIGN TO BE REMOVED • BE PAINTED • x I v w I CONCRETE DR I VE -TH • U { TYF'.) - ./ I i i � �� LA*lDSGAP J 7 TRAFFIC YELLOW I 1 .� " / u �° �v" � �8. " x--- . ,, �� �' -- PREVIEW BDS. / ccyc. ,. _ Q � ' • EXISTING SIDEWALK (VERIFY) TO REMAIN • • 6 STL. PIPE -FILL I I „ , / ASP'r'ALT �, ® W/ NON - SHRINK 2.2' ENGROAGHEMENT . - DO NOT ENTER MENU BOARD I SIG SIGN - =2e EXI STING FENCE" TO BE REMOVE GROUT 4 ROUND TOP j ' � , " z TYP• R • 0 / I 1 I'15• -7 LENGTH � , 4 0 OF DRIVE -THRV DBL. STRIP / a _ :� J GONG. STAIRS Ar . I � t �I I a I DRIVE � # � ' R =28' A ,a, / e„:„‘_,- ,.� ., � / ' , p g- , 2 ,' ¢ - ' . e - . . a W/RAlL1 (SEE DTL. 2 /SP -I -) f k � • PAVEMENT '. -' ` '. 4-* irk a ' L.P. , / , / i I 26 I ' _ t - 1 ) °� ® ► 'r , / / i j a _ AND ASPHALT ELEVATIONS I , LP. ' ' ' , , / ' ; ' ' ' 1 L AVDSGAPt= look: / , P. _ . .' T ONLY ' , u , r i r.. _ L A'trS G P .PE LA �DSGAPE / / / / / t i� i / f o o o °� o c ! o ° o f o g ° N ' %c{d 56 00 E 243 (286 O _ r / / / / / x; 50.00 LONG CHORD SEGMENT = N 33d36 O�i E 158. 14 /� t . •DO c0O o�O co', �O o�O o�O o�O #� / TRAM ORME / / / , • • Q ! o EX(5Tr'i LIGHT , (RE: LE GT) :ONGAVE WESTERLY 4 + r • i O � POLE (RE: ELECT) ' / / / / T le• ' �' ti r ! -1 I 1 - \I‘.3--1 i __. '" / / ; , // ( 1 J COMPACTED GR I� 1 / / \ , , �L �,L �L �L 1 I ! ; 4 r1 I= , F I LL (SEE CIVIL) � , ° t�' -t" 62 - s' 6' -5" _ 43' -Y ° / ' / i i j O " r ` ► 18 ti GO FT C. , - . I S ,' / 5ti tT1GL • E7 C45TIN6 TRA ' / / / . ► (70 BE RE- LOGA TED,� I / J Z r� EXISTING , A / / / / ' „ I,,, ,, SI GNAGE \ ` TO REMAIN ` i + , ` GHR19T1AN - - .. ... _ . / / / ; / 1 ' PM Ili z e ,/ + \� ( \ • MARKETPLACE (- a / / % / % V V A _ I - � - -' ► ,' _ + ■ L -L - FfMS}i FLOOR / / I / / / i' ZO (; / 1 ■ , 1 \ a ° e EL 21 31' - : . ' / / / / I- v a • N V N NOTE= VERIFY LOCATION / 1 1 k / 1 + + _ . , J T -tea A . I / / / / /' / ,n �j ' C Q ! t)t OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES \ \ / 1 1 4 I m - / / - / / ` / / � S/ , " L �o _J -4 0 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ,/ - 1 ' 1 1 e / / / / / ' �- u Y ' 1'-b" 1 EXISTING PARKIN LO'1',' *O SE SEALED AND _ ° I /' ;' , i / / ,' I- / RESTRIPPED TO I S QZIGIN�IL STRIPPING PATTERN: - -- e 1 ' : 1 - ° ` j - , , ' ' ' , i---\ � �/ BOLLARD �" /� ' REFER TO G1+VIL AN ' O- ENGINNERS REPORT FOR / I et 6 / / ' / / • / / 1 1 D 1 I-� ,/' ANY OTHER ADD(T`�ONAI WOR IN THESE AREAS °/ _ L ° --- , / ' yt...., / / _ i�136�d01�1���k1tNl� CI�O� W 2 - - 0 - 3/4 1' -0�� - - - - -- '� �\ ; ` \ \ �/ r r . ''/ /' / ' f MU- Z 01(1, a 1 1 / \ , • a ? . PLE • . 6 Gt-IT LANE / / / • \\ ,/ ` PACIFIC NW . ' / / -� / / „ I ,, , ' \ VOTS / i // V. \ /` /' / / • / r' ®� ( L.P.) PROVIDING NEl1 LIGHT POLES 1 , E X ISTING PA INT - J ' ■ , / + STRIPPING _ - # / / / / / - ,. EX!STiN6 r -- -- - n ! / / , / ' - . 1 . ° _ ° ° - - . ' / / / . / (f) / / / : ^ \h„ I ,m�': �' -! ►BALL "cUSTC , Ee ,, , S ATE DATA �� ' 1 : "� PARK NO C •s ' 6" TREE / / / / , i No ThRu I EXISTING - e . / / • / / Ynny \ I N j a -'- TRAFFIC" , ii T. , 1 5 ENT RANCE BUSINESS , ° �/ /' /' . j,'^r I'�i 1( �, ° < I 1 E ouauETS , . SITE AREA 56,574 S.E. _ !I • 4 • , t + \ j r FLO RIST o - / -' ( ftI I LI1 / ___ - BUILDING AREA • 3 361 SE r ' ..e + 1 1 \ ; \ 1 + \ ; \ 1 - , / 5 -O (V RI FY) , gl:,,I y l I y �"�. ■ 6 c • a \ \ • ° - � " b. PARK'G REQUIRED • (1/200 S.F.) - BLDG 16 SPACES �. , 'i� ;� "i a ° Ey 1 1 o , ,,J! , 2 " � STD. PIPE RAIL k . °. ` L- , # 6" CON WAL OVER \ ` ., .;, PP: u ra HANDRAILS BOT 11 ° • °---- -�_ t• L9 ,r __ Y �� I „ , \ e ° �� (1 PER (2) EMPLOYEES. - E MPL 12 SPACES ; � RA11 =5. WELD A 111 , .. ° ° q p / �- 6 GRANULAR COMP FILL '���� i p .' ' \ ` JO INTS, GRIND SMOOTH "CHRISTIAN ° e / / W/MEDIMUM BROOM FINISH TOTAL PARK G REQUIRED 23 SPACES 1 PARK G P R ® VIDED • - 53 S PACES � • Z PRIMED 4 PAINTED MARKETPLACE" / / 12 (TYP) ' C' (VERIF COLO W ! OWNER) ' (TO REMAIN / ' / , FND 5/P : IR iNI A • _` - - HANDICAPPED PROVIDED • : 3 SPACES 1 , ni i. • ,� � _ - - i / - BOX MARKED "O5#HD" Date i,.al' _ _ ___ - ,68 - _ w TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 56 SPACES -= • i 4 L ; o E.J. essit / - . , . . . _ . • A. 1 '� ---- _ - -� f • PROVIDE TOOL JOINT - KMG - - HEA /' / / wr 8 GROOVER/JOINTER . - . >M - - / ' / - - BROOMI MIN. DEPTH OR ALT. "" ,- " PAR R = 16.66 SPACES I 1,000 S.F. Checked �y FINISH _ �AAR�E A V . / / o i - - GALV SEEL S . I /�" RADIUS TYP.' - -� -___ / / APPROVED METHOD - L�• . TLEEVE 1 - - - - -- i ; PROVIDE 1 55Ued By {BGI) E XPANSION L ANDSCAPE COVERAGE (18,679 S.F.) 33.02 WELD PIPE RAIL JOINTS ON EACH SIDE ---10- TO SLEEVE PAIN - BICYCLE RACKS • • (1/15 PRK Ga SPACES) 4 REO D. W/ RUST PROHIBITING . • ` �� /' OF WALK AND MIDPOINT . v �K TtP. Scale Fl .GRA LENGTH OF WA . GROOV NON -SL + � � ' NOSING \ (SEE tD TL.715P -2) 1' = 20' -d' . • • - - Job No. a R Li p II" ti , - r ,_ m j 'S' p 94136 - -", I TYP. RAILING AT CONCRETE STAIR TYP. STAMPED CONS. WALK. SITE PLAN zk. , Sheet No. - _ m 3/4 "= I'i0" T N15 DETAIL 15 USED WHEN (2) OR mos ORE STAIR RISERS ARE 4 3/ &"= 1' -0" (THIS DETAIL 15 TO BE USED AT ALL 1 i" = 20'- ' ' ` / _ . NECCES TO ACCOMODATE GRADE CHANGE INTO SITE. PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY CONNECTIONS) SP -1 - ».-?!: a .- a.. ,:,� s ,. 2 , ... v _. ?J -+ - -,, . i h u siz r.r �-- v_•+,.a. ..., _.... h. ..., . . s< ..- .. : -..9. . . . - _ . 3 't .. ,q n • '+r r.t ..+n . - { x _ #. -« -.� - SL ... - +. .w .y:r•.. .:.:< +,. +r . >... - -` < . � 3 - - �- � i Y - i;, >:.:.. - ..,+.. .,... r. t- r. ,. s. n -. ae?R. a -. .. _. - - a . - _..- _.. _.. .. .. . . .• _ . _ • s�5evo TEXT: PER OREGON - . , - 1 HANDICAP CODE STATUTES SEE Pi-. 4/5P1 4" WIDE PANT STRIPE _ . (TYP a 3 LOCATIONS) • _ • . BUILDING LINj= RA18Ep ` O9'� - TRUNCATED DETECTABLE W/ (2) COATS OF TRAFFIC YELLOW PAINT \ (VERIFY W/ LOCAL JUSIDICTION5) WAIIINC� SURFACE • (TYPICAL. 4 EXISt'G CONDIt1t10N5.) t-- -• J,.f ' VAN - ACCESSIBLE VERBAGE -t Li.�ND5,P E� 235" O PAINT WHITE. 1 1 �1r (U - 4 APPLSCABLE) - (RE;LANDBCAPE PLAN) - - j - , _ 6 B " CONC. CUR . \\ , 3 TYP. c" --- QQ - -.f , .. «:i 4 16 GA. GALv. SIGN TEL (RE: CIVIL FOR TYPE) ;.. •.. • .�, .. ; ; .N .,; .> •.� ._ SP -2 ° (L -I ^ \ ° ° a SIGN PAINTED W/ BLUE - CONC. PLAZA, SIDEWALK -4 �- \ 1 1 i" RADIt{ 12" FIELD, REFLECTIVE WHITE THIS AREA (TYP.) - - - v 4 I Q- \\ 1 BIKE RA GKB r (TYPJ SYMBOL t i" 1-11G1-1 _ REFLECTIVE WHITE LETTERS. _ \ ��� 5��_ ���_ i r�� iii_ 1 t ■ ■■ii■ ■■ i i ■■iiii■■■i . s, �� - A ® `1 0_ >✓ \ \ 1 Ail �l��■ti,� = t ■ ! s��■■! ■! ■� ° a 1 S CREW t0 POST W/ (3) J cn , \ A ■ t■ ■ ■■■t! 'Was .■ ■ ,�l_S I ■■ ■r , _ "94 x s SCREWS. VERIFY W/ a } - \ 1 ■■►t! !! man _ ■ :_ .. I =! ! ■ !k. • RAISED WI 1 ■■tt ■��t ■ t■ ■tr - "fi ■■■ ■■ ■�► i STATE I LOCAL REQ �. d ►- w - `°.�.� ,%��•�ltai ■■ _ ■■_ ■►.4�G� ■ ■ ■s_i�. - I. TRUNCATED DETECTABLE -- i Coo co — ' N 4 oiii11 =■ ■ �I i! .■■�.■■! ■■ •ail ih. 1• �/ ., �► .. -� +6 _ '- ■■■ ■� _ •_�!!!!!■ �!!■ ��Stt ■ / �► >r■ ■ ■ ■! ■►�� WAR ING SURFACE TEXT PER WASHINGTON �;- „ , F ��.� - �..��. . PAI WHITE. - - W Q o n t I 11 1 1 r I ,, ,. `7 i „ 6 -O" 3 - O" HANDICAP CODE pi__ I ± ,1 _ I I / /j' , ~ 1 `% J ■ / TYPICAL MI .-- Q o 1 _ I . ,, /� ,..► }- STATUES (TYP t CO R r 1 r /. Q Q 4 3 Q I I I I I // v �/ - - _ Se g U ad 3883 : • --1 ......1 .� In I , / �'/ - d a _ �; U 1 oI / I �` 1 ` � ?` : r ,. s< : Z A - J / % �� / ` ! flJ C 1 I1� III + � 9' - 0" �Y 1 `� .. 000 0000.. 'E I :: :r • .k = v 7 ---- s :> 112 '•4 • x 1:12 ' U s Q LI A a O ° f I • S� Oi, 60� M :::,:•: <•: :3:3 • :.� :9: 8383 888 > c� »•.!sta!ba. +.: C -...t — 4 9 : VAN- ACCESS �` T YP �" �u � f- 9 o �— U V -0" MiN. - STANDARD — o,. } _ O �.•. 8 - 6 MIN - COMPACTS 3 zz r � 04 ASPHALT PAYING % ' 12" TYPE W !L c 6 : �• 9 ; o �� " CONC. CURBS n i a _ , 0 ° CC , (R TE PLAN) FLUSH CURB O 11 >- '` BUILDING SITE DEVLP. e< C3 4" PAINTED 8' 0•, W 0 I o CONTRACT CONTRACT m 0...4 F CD - STRIPES - PAINT WHITE A Q �' -'- SPACE I Revisions .- TYP. PARKING STRIPE. 90 and 60 TYP. TRIPLE. HANDICAP SP TYP HANDICAP RAMP HANDICAP SIGN IN PLAZA 1/8".1 N oTE: 3 P ,[ AVEMENT SHALL BE SAME COLOR A5 EXISTING ON SITE - - 1/4 " =1'_0" 3/4 " =1 -0" OTHERWISE ALL H.C. SPACES SHALL BE PAINTED WHITE , - W/ BLUE BACKGROUND. • GOLD ANODIZED SPUN ALUMINUM - BALL, FLUSH SEAM , PROVIDE YERBAGE AT ALL W % a 'STOP' 4 'ONLY' STOPBARS .1 )- ) (VERIFY SIZE,STYLE 4 COLOR '' Q 2 W/ LOCAL JURISDICTIIONS) N (TYPICAL) - - - BLDG. OR P.1.Px CURB • , - -- >- --1 - 16 GA. GALYx SIGN STEEL (WHERE OCCURS) • _ FLAT TOOLED AREA ` 4 Q u_ E u — a- SIG=N PAINTED U!/ BLUE CONCRETE WALK W/ DIMENSIONS t COLOR :'" CENTER ON JOINT t }- O 9" CAST ALUMINUM CLEATS FIELD, REFLECTIVE WHITE ILO" WIDE PAINTED /Th. 6x6��W1.4x W1A WWF g MED. BROOM FINISH J " 1 1 RADIl,lS STRIPING (VERIFY 'Fir - - - - 1 1/4 mom TOP OF SLAB b sl 0 MODEL ECXA25 FLAGPOLE W/ REFLECTIVE O HIGH LETTERS. TYP. 3' -O" W / LOCAL CODES) (INTERRUPT JOINT) TOOL JOINT W/ a) w 1 '! "335 BLACK FINISH BY EDER FLACs ( 3 Architect Seal • ' ' - P LAZA �i� i MANUF. COMPANY (OR APPROVED EQ.) Ar- GROO JOIN TER `�' � SCREW TO POST / � " _ J OINT t SEALANT. i I" MIN DEPTH A 1 1 - Y -. ALUMINUM F . 0_ SEALANT TO MATCH LASH COLLA x 3 a" SGRE IUS, VERIFY U.,/ _ � . COLD OF ADJ. STATE "4 LOCAL REQ 3. ' ,`� „". EIR0 _` .-. ' 1 , M iN / c Q " � `~ GONG. WALKS. � "` � 3 ,' ` 6i, .. . • .. � ' . • ` ' a ; � HA RDWOOD EDG=ES (SUPPLIED � � 3 �f FY E _� .. • .. .. e #} V a BY OTHERS) ) ,(1 - .: . . ' %�. .a�, R ., . �" j { d :•: z TEXT: PER 0 EMBED INTO CONCRETE PLA ,, 1 3 L 57,A7E - :t _ ` . ► ri . ► • ' s ► • ee ' . e . e , e 'e e _ , FOUNDATION SLEEVE HOT D ; \ r ` P . , P (RE: SITE PLAN FOR LOACATIONS) a d o d % . ., ' . . . 4 - , . : , o _ I . U NAND ICAP t � 311. '1�?. Oaf �C. , o ° . o a o - ' O I STEEL EEL o 0 .9 ° o o d o — Q CODE STAUTES 2342 � a I6 i' -6i t0TE8 : o ° a o ` o • . a o • al dl STEEL CENTERING WEDGES (X � j �� ' • 11 1 � OW -- — f :., I.) INSTALL BIKE RACK AS PER ' _I _ ; 1 2 STL. 1 I STE BASE PLATE Q �i MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. CONCRETE WALK POS FIBER EXPANSION W/ - .,1 NOTE: ALL DIRECTIONAL ARROW64 STOPE3aR5 ARE TO BE APPROVED 2) PROTECT BIKE RACK SURFACE FROM JOINT MATERIAL 6 WI.4x Wi.4 IMF s �1 4- _� U BOLLARDS TO - BY LOCAL JURISDICTIONS OR ODOT FOR ACTUAL. 1 1/4" FROM tOP OF SLAB a, - I W /6 T .3 CIRCULAR O B D W _ REIN. +'5 1/E R t COMPLETION 01= PROJECT. ES 9 12 MAX O 24 LAP O DAMAGE UNTIL COMPLE O PR JE �` - 3 M � TI . - � �, GRANULAR BASE TRAFFIC C Y LO TYP. DIRECTIONAL. (SEE CIVIL) GRANULAR BASE u� (SEE CIVIL) STEEL SUPPORT PLATE WELDED !L PAVEMENT/PLAZA N. 8" 4 STL w . PIPE -FILL TO GROUND SPIKE - SURFACE W/ NON -SHRNK J ®INT FLAGP RE :GfVIL i t TOP ARROWS and STOPBARS TYP. BIKE RACK (XPANSION CONTROL JOINT' o al 1 /4I': 11 -0" 6 1/2 " =V -all 7 1_1/2",11-0" . I-1/2"=i - ' 1 /211 =11 -all 5 w � ____%______ a N w • i, ,4'_01 , - 00.0 - 0 0.9 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 q, Q - v t t 0 9 - 0 0 0 6 - 0 0 0 0 0 Q 4' - O" 6' - O° 4 0 a°0 c00 000 c 0 ►O o00 000 000 -, GATE DROP BAR _ • - . '• ; 41 . �. 0- w CONC./PAVING \ ` � c ° ° ° ► 0 ¢- ~ r riri►.r►i►ii►iir► r wri SURFACE :� v y � STL. GATE W/ ' 5' ROCK -FACE I (RE:GIYIL) '.I — _ _ r ..� _ - _ d I BLACK POLY SLATS. / 0 BLOCK WALL PAINT _ i o 4 4 (PROVIDE MIN. 2" CONTAINER • IN FACE c tT. -- — GL IDDEN- i - 18" CONC. FTC. b"; v y In CLR BETWEEN BO PANE / OF GATE 4 SLAB GRE , I 0 50YY41/053 SEALANT % % b � a �' I / . E l NOTE: i ► �' BOLLARD (TYP) PROVIDE CORM I SET SLEEVE FLUSH ' 11>D 1 CORNER BARS P ALL EXPOSED STL. � ,. R�4MIN C W /- CONG./PAVING t 0 0 v 1 SEE DT 2 /SP (R STRUCT, 5 ) SCALE : 3/4 11 -0" 61 o _ cui PSTER AT T R4 H ENCLOSI W/ SET IN SEALANT. % % oZ a . =- / i 8" ROCK FADE - " i -N--- . e SPECIFIC TYPES OF -� GLIDDEN #50YY04 - I /O53 = • O / j -- -- R ASE BLOCK BOND /�r����o���o.. /, 311 01,4 5 TEEL� I r I BEAM ' . ►i. ='AP .4 t. :x 7,.:; gx _ .n. � � v ► I � `� RECEPTACLES W LL _ PIPE - - - - - VARY W/ LOCAL A HO RIZONTAL REIj )ORGING • ATE ti IA + " L _ — / - V R (RE• STRUC7. 5 irVER■FT " ' 6 T. CONC. 61. B W / " IIi�' , . "''� i l o ti _ _ + _ SERVICES (SIZE TO BE VERIFIED �, 1 -6 t i •I, a�l1; " ,,,e, . , r- y � 111 V - - GRANULAR B,A E -- -- -, 1 ; OVER COMPACTED PRIOR TO BE CONSTRUCTED) N O T E : TYPE PANT 1 =1N18N VERIFY ACTUAL SLEEVE LOCATIONS W/ GATE MANUF. r► q 1 1 6x6 1.4x1.4 MP w SPLIT -FACE � ) MIL. CAP W/ I 17 la c 1 (RE: STRUCT) / C1 IU. VERTICAL BARS FULL WELD On CAN "' I I " �, ; :�' � i .. � i l RE STRUGT. S -1) ! AL f I ,' � TRASH AND GE ' DUI IPSTE, N h �► U � � GRIND SMOOTH ,r ASPH ' . ►� «� ►1�,� I T E E HANDICAP SIGN N , d 6' -O" I.O.M. ' 0 / I 1 z �, , pi "4 BARS 32" O.G. N ► ► ►,1� r CHAIN LINK FENC B OL 1 SL V "_ 1; 111U i 11 W / POLYETHYLENE 1 : r- � ... W/ 6 I }OAK i ii Igl j i ►� b i/ / jN : ti, ` ii — — — 1 . ' _ ( RE S TRUCT . S -I ) , p ►1N '' !� SLATS (VERIFY COLOR _ • FILL W/ CONC - I - •�1 « ► ►!`N W/ ARCHITECT.) rip �,� ° ° ' �� � i '' _ _ _ 1 3 � STEEL PIPE ��� P AINT BOtT, COURSE 8" - O �►�P <► a'1' • � Ili AM CURB Ili/LANDSCAPING ' , 1.0 0 1►f 4 •' 1►4� 4 • -- - • (RE: LANDSCAPING) ;►' GLIDDEN 30YY19/053 .9 •••e►►i},411 3" 0 STL. POSTS I irp 1 ; CONT. AROUND ENCLOSURE _ ,�'pq►e►'�►41' FILL W/ CONC. BOLLARD (TYP) - R0'0 i SPLIt -FACE C1 I.u. WALL BE NNER SEE DTL. 2 /6P -i 12 12 ya" 6 " CURB- SLOPE TO SLAB (/ a�►�1��►,i /i►p►da • _ - -'' ``-'' cr-I * LINK GATE S TANCE A S P -2 (1/4" PER FT. MIN.) � a J SEALANT Date il CONC. WALK / U N.4.. /..1!.d,;G ..m .�■o■ 9 (SEE 5171+ PLAN) - / : _ "'�■` �I� ASSOCIATES Ark 6 TNi GO ��s �+ •� ••1� - -• —+— 6 " x6 " C CUR / DBE. LEAP CHAINLINK ' S L A B ��.� • ' - � P ROVIDE NECESSARY Ohl s • r • s o s . 1 1 , os , r DEBAR AND DOWELS SLOPE TOP TO SLAB ARCHITECTS , P.C. Drawn By 1 1 , \ \. BRACING AND WHEELS _ .oa �o o a I : d ` -�, .� (RE: STRUGT. S -I) (i!4 /FT. MIN} 1 N.W. TENTH AV '�� �v �� �.-� 13 ON EA. GATE FOR STABILITY _ _ � 1 1 ° ■' — u x6 SUffE 300 Checked By _ _ = 6 GONG S LA B W / 6 _ _ ..... _ _ �° SMOOTH - -__ I _ d ,� _ _ -,: - e s s ' � � -; _ A 1 , —- I } p 1 FACE -� 0 . I 1 s 1 cn CLR FROM TOP a v 6 POR1 " t X503 228.066 . (RE: CIVIL) _ I 1 .. HOER -BACKS CONC. APRON - 0 4 : i , -- yam GRANULAR BAST~ FAX (503) 228.3821 issued By (SCI) 6 I e . .4 - GRADE_ �� �� PROVIDE MED: BROOM FOR GATE o r r c1 �C �t , ,a 1 :I d ' _= � 1; VERIFY LOCATIONS WI ASPHALT d I '° ^1 ` 1 {--, I ? , �t FINISH (RE; STRUCT 5 - 1) y PAVING I . , • 1 - • e 1 •. = COMP ' r, u Q -� _ Scale l DTLR- 5/SP -2) 2' - 1 e , , GRANULAR � I A5 SHOWN 1 �- ' i . -� �— ASPHALT P AVINCs RE: CI VIL TYP. J 11 BASE - RE: CIVIL 4 , 1 -6 `^ L - cv 4 J} I SL AB B EDGE� N RE• S �RUCT. S -1) Job NO. — _��1�� li — � ; TYP. PROVipE G. STL HINGES 4 LATCH EQUIPMENT U1/ DROP 1' - 8 " y r � CO ZN1 1 OAR 4 GATE H OLDB A C K SLEEVES 0 FULL OPEN POSITION. • (�/� �` 7 rel s-t- NOTE: REFER TO SHEET 5 -I I ' :I:: � T � 94136 , A FOf� ALL FDOTINCs t DEBAR /� D ETAI L TRASH ENCLOSURE SI�CTI ®N S R Y I C E YARD PLAN' S C 1 ION I GAT < .: , - . Sheet NO. w 10 "_ 1 u 3 /Q." ; �'_a" 1/2" = �1 -x NOTE: REFER TO SHEET S -I FOR ALL FOOTING 1/4 1 -O 3/8" = i' =0" AT1oN lS T RUGTa . ' _ _ DEBAR INFORMATION.. . .:' SP —2 z I _...., ._ , __... -.._ ,. _ d. .. -_.+ _. a, .. �s_.- a.... .. . :. .,. . --::., -. a .-- __•h:. .... .. . _- 'v .. .. _ -_ -... .,.• __ - -. -, .- .: : -...r ., :... s.-_, ,:ter. ,- ..- .e.�.^ -, . _.,, ... t. "...:.. ..s , - .. - ":.. >. .- ..:.._ a. -i,.w, W... ,. ,-. �.. ,. :�,k; .;.:. �w .4 ..�... v .' s .. :., ..._ .. -5 zx .X ., s _.., •}r.,. ;*=g..S,t .e -+... c--1" - - .w �. '�. .,fk , -.,, a ... -'t., .. K. -. 2'id,. .r.,_ -._ �. a_3 .5....,... ..Y"'.1. .;.5.- ,3..,. �'S,.!' w - ,- .. -x�. �d:ik' r�'r�....'X`,+3 ,e. -,. ,,- -._ .- .. .G ,.. n. .- Sou m w.F. ,_! wsz ,.._ s x , . __ _ 4 . irlf . .. .' .._: 1 , °4 lTP " { !2 COG - - -, EXISTING MAPLE - EXISTING MAPLE - EXISTING FIR TREE . ° - ;� '. - TO REMAIN , - - TO REMAIN • ; ; TO REMAIN �° , .„ ,, „:. :.: ,, • _ _ ° •. ► rte . _ b . .. - - .. . ..., ., . .. - - -- I ' : '-' , , . , Y , . r . . _ , �J , a a a a a► a a a a a ► a a ► a a a a a► aL i, a► a a a a a a a s _�� a a a aim a a a a► � W V ;; •:.; 1 1 l ' E 1 1 1 � � i ± 1 / ` . - OW . .4 i r 4 k 4 I /4171 ‘ dei•--' . • • . . ., • • _ . . ' 141 #4 1 10 1 "4 \ • \ ' ',. \ _ .\ - • \VAN ',. i _ -- \ '0 _, y sly , \ AR.I , 'i )0/ _ \ ' \ 4 - \\ , ., . . ,. ._•,, • _ s\ , \\;, 11 (if CI: ... .7 .. .....:. .,....: :. =.:..>:........ ......;:, . , 69 PL" �/ `.- R• i "..,-►tea _. . F �" S E ERA LAt! t • z �I �� i► ► 6 BTA 9 STA !6' }3TA ���+QA „ b .- _ . a- . fir► - \ ��► W , • 13 PLO 4 . • - d �-- - --- -- ;' :, _� - . �" ' • �� I'�� 1 ARRS 1 ARRS • t .� � ►,� 18 PJ • - . . - • " it .. :.• 7 iiiy, , / _ . . • — . • • • • c -, / .. , . • _ .. „ -:•. ,v __..... . ... , --. - "A AV , ,,,/' / ./, , , • ,, .. , . . • . . ,/ . . � M ' }'�� �` �� ; s... �,` �p � ' 31 VD AHC ' ;� y`�'�.� i f O AW • - . 22 B TA d_ / 1�� a 110" r , W , . OIL. 0 oj Id /1 -- _ --- ,- - ...91-'1,-'SS-;LA.N•li'‘-1 1- . . - 61 r 1 gil ' — _ . VAr ui. ,. _A ,--1 - -.4 . __ _ _ . 1 AR:Rs ckc 0 < i l i , Jjj 26 BTA � F I � , �� it �► a`,� . i 1 .w 1�. 1 f ■ • S E ED A l CJ�1 . r , / O = HC. Q '� �� 1 - - mss/ ¢t J ,� '� ' • • ,/ O • . IIIP ui ,& Mx 11), st ' ‘g - .•1 _ � OPOSED o , - - f �,,. ,� y V 29 P s 0 1 t P E 3OSYO1� t CI4ICKEN `�► ♦ ; � � , � �, 3, ., o, - ��' r : i; ARR A • ' � �� �1,. */� 16 BTAI ::: O F � �► 1 , :� Jr 4 J I , O It A ► � _ ' - ► .� "„ '► OM GOUND TO R eva sions r W 'fir, ��� 39 VD r `" Y .,• ' ' f 1 ‘41.10)° ., w., �, I .' ° , 11/18/94 _ PER • '� , DESIGN REYIEUI I1 !* t 4 o - /- TA GOMM TS / J EN .. .. _ _ .. _ � ; r �_ K / . . PLS . ` ' , 1 ': fi r° - a - ::;2_ .�- - , _ . L�JI , ,� I �► `f d t� I F ; Ti__, vie. i .. .,'(` ;' R. ` ' „: ,:, : = . :_ 1 V� zt ie � � r "- ---- --- TREE TIES I . REMOVE BURLAP A ND TWINE FROM lir 1 ARKS 22 BTA. � e � � �� ���d► I.�,,,L �; TOP 1/3 OF BALL AFTER STAKINCs � . �< �y, ` R EMOVE ALL TIUINE AROUND t3AS 1 ARRS �/ -.4, - , ¶t t4 i _ 141. 20 BTA , 1 ARKS �tl��� /.� ►. • , ' - - OF TREE TRUNK TO THE FIRST BRANCH. . t 1 6 BTA r , P LACE R OOT 1:3ALL AT TOP OF MULCH (lb ` ' bEejRr, 037, ♦I / , 0 . LAYER.. • ii 1 . b t i ; / /s�� a ��� l �� A 1 1 mow- • � \ 4: . to ...-...... jj, 0 Alt* i ' ' \ '' . ' , ' \ \ \ \ \ .., ONLY . ►. !� a ► a IY. a !� rt a ! a► a a a I a a a a a a a a ►! a ► , ►����e �p.� • . 411.466 is�sv �L� y ' L�IZ�L�# • L 1. isi.�L�.41. LM�.L�Lla.ia./.1. •i ,, 1 ■���1 �• r e 73 •• K 0 . SOIL MIX BACKFILL AS SPECIFED. { 1 f I ���.� :...... I ry OREGON , ' : \ i -44 / ' �' < L .. / / �' • 4 :. :. S AND BOTTOM OF . SGARIF WALLS . - 1, :- ,i YlU L /' p ��•� $ PLANTING PIT. t �� ( � ` � ��► • . / / f ` •.. ft* .. .• ,•• ' . , /// --------- ;- il - - ,• / I , / / . . , J I S 2 >C D 1 A. OF J rT } _ J, '1 f } ; ! : r ROOT BALL ? f i I i 1 • tt ! J' f f {JJ f f . /J \ 1 / ' L 7 • , !} ` r r l / .. , ____ __ . / , ■ a i ,. I 1 TREE PLANTIN DETA1L • ''. / ' / / m ' NTS fn J EXISTI PA>RICING OT -. - -- _. _•- _ - F , ; ° / ' . ct ' /"' ° , i , i ' / f LI • j - , � F 'I I . Vi f \ r _ _ . � 1 : , f FL 4 NT MAT RIALS LISTING ,, - r; — EXISTING ; i , �n j r f ,' , / , B ILDING ; + / QTY SYM BOTANICAL NAME - COMMON NAME SIZE REMARKS • . � . f r- / .d ` �, ,.._ / / i i // /' f TREES C { - - = = -- -- - - ; ; ° A /_ 6 APSK ACER PALMATUM 'SANGO KAKU' 'SANG O KAKU MAPLE 6' r1' 845 co 1 { ,{ I / / 14 ARKS ACER RUk3RUM 'RED SUNSET' RED SUNSET MAPLE 2' CAL 848 • ` 0 . , I / 6 FCC P YRUS CALLERYANA 'CLEVELAND' CLEVELAND PEAR 2 CAL P45 - I ° / UJ STERN RED CEDAR - 6' -T 548'1 • / 13 TP TNUJA PL f CATA E —_ _ " '`-- : -`-- , t \ \ '' _._- - i di 1 ! } i �, 14 PM PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESI I DOUGLAS FIR 5' 848 �L1,11 ■ • , . . °. • 4 r' 34 A NC NIN CR IMS O N A • AZALEA 3 COAL. CAN Sri r : 4 A ``'— _ r' ' 162 BTA BERBERIS TNUNBERGII 'ATRCPURPUREA' PURPLE LEAF BARBERRY 2 GAL CAN .. _ _ ! f ii'' i 4vµ1 fir. . �_ __ - �. / ' . / i2 COG CHAMAECYPARIS OBTUSA 'GRACILL1S' NINOKI CYPRESS 4' -5' 845 ;\ 1 ; ,, ,i; ' ' � . -_ 201 PLO PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS OTTO LUYKEN OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL 2 GAL CAN '�" , I - . 60 PL5 PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS 'SCI -IIPK NSI5' - SCNiPKA LAUREL 1 GAL CAN till * � , ,�� °I ', _ -_ __ _ r -_. _ __..__,...,_ __ - 16 20' 1 ;` J _ _ : = 35 P JM RHODODENDRON PJM It'JM RHODODENDRON 24' -30' 3 45 ICI ilz:::).s, �' I - J• -.' _ - 31 RJM RHODODENDRON 'JEAN MARIE' JEAN MARIE RI- IODODENDRON 24' -30' F34 I Y ', 1 05 1 /D VIBURNUM D AVIDII DAVID VIBURNUM _ 2 CO CAN r 4 ...- • \,/, _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 f , - Date . - , 11/18/94 _. _ ,r fi _ Drawn By `` , MPS 1`� . ' '�� Checked By �` / : MPS _ _ : - - Issued , By (BCIr o q / / Scale • o \� - Na - : Job Na. f O - , / / 8405 S.W. NIMBUS AVENUE z P.O, BOX 84044 — --° • f- ,b 1' = 20' -O' Y PORTLAND OREGON 97280 Sheet NO . _ Z - . . (503) 626 -0455 nnin Engineering • Surre • Landscape A -L-1 : O 7 ' Pa 8 , 4, li - - -- -' - 4151=31411011115i', , FIBERGLASS BOX Wl LOCKING LIO - ( - : �, ��� r'y�;o FINISH GRADE : - ____J .1 - .. ` y� y �, {��yyy�, / � y �y? /?�.�QO�r - p _ : . • p e a- — .. 54 rb�Yd/rh Iv 4': 0` , • 2' MAIN LINE . DOUBLE E CHECK e I I \ \ \ Aik G AL,YANtzED l �� �° ' \ �; �' . . �' ,' " I - i� jai. 3/4" Gtaae 200 PvC UNIONS CONTROLLER LOCATION IN OFFICE THIS o � ! 12 - °20 Goal. 1° Class 200 PvC • AREA. )VERIFY) PROVIDE INSTALL A • - _ ' /// 20 - 30 Gal. 1 V4' Class 200 PVC • MIN. . 4 CU. FT. OF 4 RAINBIRD RCM -68 WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER ; 30' :- 45 Gal. I i/2' Glass 200 PVC n. WA$ ED' VEL t � . �! RA p 5 -0 ABOVE FiN. FLOOR 110' POWER ON A 45 - 60 Cs 2 Glass 200 PVC SUMP SEPARATE CIRCUIT AND SWEEP ELL` CONDUIT _ ' r NRU I , j.t 13Y op-Ts. / s / : 60 90 Gal. 2 -I/2' Class 200 PvC I I I `� , //// V 7 e / � \1 ,O� p!�� CHECK q 1 \' 1 `V`1wit 1AJ LAS ` .� A ° u1�/L.6 C1 , EC!i f �L I E YI E TI - ( 1 - :: ' - , �'�/ / ,, rJ 5`/� \'"j ^Y�l / \/ iJ - , , - ." a - Y , - t - -- -` N TS / .. 15 I c, 0.._ ,,,//./...// __._____ _ _ • . �— _�.... z •:),. / .1 ' 2 0 t I , — / -: , 6' 0 r` '/ SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES - AS N 7 O - FINISH GRADE FIBERGLASS BOX MIN. 2' COIL ON ` AT , t ! s e J ; ! tY 4�0 ° I f / O I�' GL 20 PVC PIPE TY PICAL —_ \it A 55 0P I - = O Q CONTROL WIRE - –: - - - - ' . ; . '. ��a., _ _ • e P OINT OF CONNECTION WITH I -1/2 BALL VALVE Q J f` I ELECTRIC CONTROL , �. 6OSTON CHICKEN - - ,- % / / 69 1 -if2' DOUBLE CHECK VALVE - SEE DETAIL m } r ( l LVE L el*: CONTROL HANDLE ► ® 3,301 .�. I 1 °' 1- /f LOCKING QUICK COUPLING VALVE WI ' a /` 26 Revisions . = ! P.V.G. UNION ON ONE . � ' ° � � - O MANUAL DRAIN VALVE - SIDE OF VALVE . ► , . e e ° t 11/18/94 PER ...,• ,. 1116 Y 1 ! ` `� . -r v / / I RAINBIRD P.E f3. SERIES ELECTRIC VALVES - SEE DETAIL DESIGN REVIEW MIN. 2 GU. FT. WASHED q �Y. P V.C. MAINLINE 1 A GRAVEL SUMP 0 � T 1.......... 1.......... 4�' 1, 1 - __ Lo. v .v..1 �' Il � �`� • ' / COMMENTS Al _ POiNT OF CONNECTION (VERIFY) - 2 , 4ui 111 ! ry / / CONTROL VALVE NUMBER, GPM, AND VALVE 512E IRRIGATION STUB OUT PROVIDED 1~3Y '- / t��.) OTHERS. (SEE CIVIL DWG.) PROVIDE 4 . 11 14N • r / / INSTALL A i -t,2' SENSUS DEDUCT !"PETER �� / f } ® RAINBIRD RGM -6B CONTROLLER AS NOTED . I ) _ 1 -t/2 B ALL VALVE 1 -1/2 DOUBLE CHECK VALVE, r / - ► 3 ' Q.C.Y. AND M.D.Y. IN FIBERGLASS BOXES , • ° e' j r �� CONTROL. V,AL.YE 4 SOX CET�4I L. EQUIRED. 30 �■ ❑ ► 6' e / KEY \ � , \ 0 '® \+ \ \ ; 4 HEAD COMPANY d CAT. NO. RADIUS G.P.M. P.S.iY Y , FIN1 � � q Y . , + i, , SH G RADE l \ �� � \ p i / ,;,:%•1;',-44,14,/ „ti #11•, ; r'i ; ,,44,...,:.1, 4 ,4. 1 :# 0 ,4.,. ., (�., I ) \ \ \ ,` L5 �. .. �' r / / mil . `� - \ AINIRD 12 SERIES 12 b5 -2b 30 QU ICK GOUPL INCs VA1 �\ \ / / , / / t y . \ . , _._____ R �% / D C] Q RAINBIRD 15 SERIES 15 .93 -3.1 30 e) ° —= 4 0 . s , , , . , / U11 ONLY ® -` . �„' / / 24' 0 4 REBAR STAKE ! / la CD .93 -3 / R AINBIRD 15 V SE RIES 15 .1 +� _ - , (2) 5,5. HOSE CLAMPS' PA .. ..a. » _. .-. _. .� �. ®Y. J ,'` '` _,/ • W.i” P.V.C NI PPL E I . I f ® RAINBIRD 15 S STRIP 12 30 3T C...) !' - __ _ _ ' ' J '� OREGON < `7 _' - }' �- _ _ _ -- . _ _ ____ z_:�: ___ ' / NOTE: USE V.AN. SERIES (12'.4 15') NOZZLES WHERE REQUIRED TO � � ,I P STREET ELL _ . _ , ` ELBO �' ° ° I / ✓ a _ r _ ( i PROVIDE ADEQ UATE COYERAGcE FO R ALL PLANTING AND LAWN t � rr i I ° ' f AREAS.�E A� , / I' ° I I Q ° f � + 17 / __ - P.Y.C. STREET ELL _.. ( LATERAL LINE P.V.C. NIPPLE 1 / / ,/ SHRUBS HEAD'S IN RAINBIRD 1806 PRS BODIES. / / / 1 -_ \1 \ _ _ _._..- / 'A, TU RF HEADS IN RAINBIRD 1804 PRS BODIES. / , t ° L _ (i - I ' a - � ` / INSTALL VALVE BOXES PERPENDICULAR TO WA LLS, WALKS, AND CURBS. / ; � �� . ° � : H ; / P TWQ (2) VALVES IN SAM VALVE BOX WHEN POSSIBLE. • \ _ ° ° L am• - > r� - INSTALL HE F WITH T OP O F W A LK S, WAL AND CURBS.' / . _ 1 f ' • ' I I 1 ' ma ' 11(A VOLT ELECTRICAL POWER OUTLET AT 1HE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER LOCATION r? 1A,t i l QUICK. ®I�F�L�NC� 1/r�� Y� ®�iT�I� r t / I ° ° f P ; SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. IT SHALL BE TI-4E RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION / NTS EXISTING PARK QT ' • ' ; IA I / / r / ' /� —" — —, ! I< ` CONTRACTOR TO MAKE THE FINAL HOOK -UP FROM THE ELECTRICAL OUTLET TO THE ce /•' % I I ' i I y _ ' � f AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER • / _. _- __.. E -__:.--_-_-- ., __- ____ -_ ,. THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PiPING, VALVES, ETC. SHOUIN WITHIN PAVED \ / 1 } a f , AREAS I$ FQR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL �3E INSTALLED IN PLANTING y j / / / r _ \\, ' AREA UJ -•)ERE POSSIBLE. AVOID ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, "' y ,. ° TS^ EXISTING I ! / °` r` t PLANTING AND ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES. _ V ...:> /f _ r, f / : BUILDING - / / �` THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH AND ADJUST ALL SPRINKLER HEADS FOR / � I ; / a = a I I OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE AND TO PREVENT OVERSPRAY ONTO WALKS, ROADWAYS / I ; I e / - / .. f �� A ND /OR BUILDINGS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. THIS SHALL INCLUDE SELECTING THE BEST / j ___ _- _ -_ -- -_ -_. j! DEG SEE OF ARC To Fir THE E><1 TING SITE CQNDITION3 AND TO THROTTLE THE FLOW -__ : ' / ° CONTROL AT EACH VALVE TO OBTAIN THE OPTIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE FOR EACH c.-9. ° L E P ______ _ _- _ 0 I ill f / SY � ` I I. 1 1 e ° 4 / 1� Do NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ° 'I ° °' -- \ i WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN TI-4E FIELD THAT OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR )III 4 — ` \� I ' ; ; ; ° r _- ° _ DIFFERENCES IN THE AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN 4A . �' ° • I I CONSIDERED IN THE ENGINEERING. SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS OR DIFFERENCES SHOULD BE !_l 2 +;,r, j l . , ' \ I • ( ° / RROUGHT TO THE ATTENT O F THE OW NER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. IN THE 11111',,!e ' i �oNcr�E. ° _ ,l j , i ° W.4Ck a • • ' , `- \ ', I I ► • : ° E THiS'NOTIFICATiON 1S N O T PERFO THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL i �' ' 11 ` j I j ∎ ��` 11 I . �� —{ - ' ° -' o ° e s -' � ;_; - ' ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY REVISIONS NECESSARY. 1'11114° � i, a • ' f • , v iy 1 :41 _ 8uatl i ' , I r 1 ` .�'�"k iIII� ' . �___ _ - _ _ ! , FiNI G DE �_ I? — -``� - — - - --- _ ___ __ _, _ _ _— _ , ____ _ -- _ 168.20' J // -: _ -- PLANTING /TURF HEAD ---L-7,4,4 ,, "— /4 ` ' _ _ •_. �_.___ -_ _- - - -__. __r._. ' , / BARBED ELL FITTING . a/ Date / WiTH MARL -EX 5T. ELL 11/18/94 ' - PO FLEX PIPE ` Drawn By _ _ _ Y LE 1` ' MPS �� ` . � / jsj ► BARBED ELL FITTING" _ ` Checked By : ` _ Y Y MPS _ , Issued By BC! \ ,..., - , R© . I / LATERAL LiNE x S cale • 1 . ,, = 1 Job N o. � ` . - ' - r . + � - 8403 S.W. NIrdBU5 AV ENUE .. O , / POLY FLEX RI ER CET L p o pox, 80 0 , i - 7S N 3 SCALE: 1' 20' -0 PORTLAND, O REGON 9'7280 Sheet No. O " : (503) 826 -0455 ILI ' Planning ,' Engineering f Surveying • LandKape Architecture _ L— 2 NE_FKIN)6- '3DIR9L-1---(90Q7) *A /J � - PPLICATION AND PERMIT T �? 5 -Ds" �'"' 'J � CONSTRUCT APPROACH ROA PERMIT NUMBER 'aNS p,P�o HIGHWAY DIVISION HIGHWAY NAME • MILEPOINT ENGINEERS STATION Pacific Hwy -99W 10.288 141 +47.35 HIGHWAY NiIMBER COUNTY SIDE OF HIGHWAY APPROACH TO SERVE 1W Washington XgNORTH ❑ EAST Boston Chiken Restauran ❑ SOUTH ❑ WEST BETWEEN OR NEAR LANDMARKS HIGHWAY REFERENCE MAP AND ATTACHED DRAWING NUMBERS Gaarde Ave. AND 3B -22-3 APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS BOND REQUIRED AMOUNT OF BOND REFERENCE 10,000.00 YES ❑ NO OAR 734- 50-025(6) $ INSURANCE REQUIRED ;� ADMINISTRATIVE FEE Boston Chicken NW LP `� REFERENCE 1601 114th. Ave. SE /4A YES ❑ NO OAR 73x•50.025(3) ❑ TEMPORARY DEPOSIT Suite # 130 AMOUNT CHECK NUMBER $ 50.00 Bellevue, WA 98004 DISTRICT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR DATE COMPLETE X Sam Hunaidi APPLICATION RECEIVED REGION ENGINEER DATE L _I X UTILITY PERMIT SUPERVISOR APPROVAL DATE X APPLICANT APPLICATION DATE APPROACH ROAD COMPLETION DATE: X //26 /9 _ REFERENCE: OAR 734 -50- 050(4) 08/31/95 The applicant de ares that he /she is the owner or lessee of the real property adjoining the above described highway and has the lawful authority to apply for this permit. When this ap- plication is approved by the Department of Transportation, the applicant is subject to the terms and provisions contained herein and attached hereto: and the terms of Oregon Ad- ministrative Rule. Chapter 734, Division 50, which is by this reference made a part of this permit. Copies of the Rule may be obtained from the District Maintenance Supervisor's office. Issuing of permits under these regulations is not a finding of compliance with the statewide planning goals or the acknowledged comprehensive plan for the area. Permits are issued sub- ject to the approval of city, county or other governmental agencies having either joint supervision over the section of highway or authority to regulate land use by means of zoning and /or building regulations. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to obtain any such approval including, where applicable, local government determination of compliance with the statewide planning goals. (OAR 734-50 -055) SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1 — If the proposed application requires traffic control devices and /or special road construction, the applicant shall provide a copy of this application to the affected local government. e original application must be signed by the local government official. �I�� �j LOCAL GOV NMENT ICIAL SIG 1 URE TITLE • D � I4/ / ro X 2— applicant or his contractor shall notify the District Maintenance Supervisor's office at le 48 hours in advance of commencing work and er completing the work covered by this permit. (OAR 734 -50 -040) Telephone Number: 229 3- This approach road will serve Tax Lot # 1000. In the future if any of the adjacent property owners decide to redevelop, a joint access will be required. A permenent cross- over easement for the area located to the west of the property will be required prior to starting the job. This permit will supercede permit Ift 12415 • • 4- All work related to ADA must be performed according to the current ADA standards. 5- This permit is for the construction of road approach, sidewalk ,curb,landscaping,grading & paving,utility connection, as per final approved plans. 6- Main shutt -off valve for the irrigation system will be located in the state right-of -way 7- See attached sheet for additional general provisions.See attached plan for more details. TYPE 5 APPROACH ROAD — CURBED HIGHWAY NOTE: All material and workmanship shall be in accordance with the cur - W rent State of Oregon Standard Specification for Highway Construction. RAW 8 -If existing facility on state right -of -way does not meet current — - • - - • standards,it will be applicant responsibility to recor. construct. _ 32' _ 50' see attached 90° DR /W W R,- R plan. An CURB TYPE Dc= 34 r o,, = 8 t "C" MMIll SIZE AND TYPE COMPACTED THICKNESS (INCHES) Extg. Curb STONE BASE 12 "-0 14" STONE LEVELING 3 /4' TYPE CO PACTEDTHICKNESS(INCHES) COURSE 2" q Dc CONCRETE CLASS Ile COMPACTED THICKNESS (INCHES) PAVEMENT Concrete N/A (HW i PLAN 734 (3-83) SEE BACK OF APPLICATION 0 • ■ph. Conc. Pvmt- Curb Hwy �0 0 ).). A C Driveway S1.0.02 ft• G Stone Bose B Levelling Course/ I G-GI :12 Mox. APPROACH TYPICAL SECTION 41 --Gutter Line PROFILE NOTE: If driveway grade "G a minus grade a short vertical roll should be constructed outside gutter line so as to confine drainage in the gutter post the driveway. • CONCRETE CURBS MONOLITHIC CURB a GUTTER fter 1:6 j 1. Match st. al adjacent pas. Pod. • Eapamion joint filler Sbpe %0 as ago gist Mn All details as for TYPE A. 1 - � . R , , s n0uuetl b Oroin qp !!!��pp Bet ter l� I/���m,,���I ,,,,������..,..I�^f��s7u.��r�_l. of par. This portion to W removed I Top of OUrD ss inept as shorn. Surf. 01 par _ upon extension of verb ! Gutter lim �� _ • isi AC.pw. tltltlsYYY����vvssl�• AC par. Slops narmd to qut/sr Wile Dms. S'•O'ro 3'•6'cc. '. Inkn. rear. :' — :: •::a� Inkn. vow. }' " rCpov. 1 .. '::::. -.. j .pt 1,. "s pore. • A•DOw ::: n vow. ...:::: ; NI cC 1 I_ +' .... 1..�i;:;- _.- j oft. pay. .th ' ock bass,tnkn.ver. 1 24• Bottom of curb - .. A['9 FJi 2– gs lb'dowl Dan •• Stnd.fenpw A groove mint Rock base, run sl eeve s at Rock bose,thkn.vor. TYPE B TYPE B•I tnkn.ror. du expansion jamb. For AC island in CURB ENDING DETAIL AC Povenwnt For AC island in (For Type C E Curb) TYPE A TYPE A'I AC Pavement For AC Pavement For Cone, Penmen? Ah I I I• R. d .• Pt. 4 • seal 01 W YII. OI lY11. 0} �R' e pare Ez par. — sere E T wrl.ol E _ p w =� pay. 1D AC pare 1.1...1 I� TYPE C TYPE D TYPE D -I TYPE E SIDEWALK RAMP General purpose curb For Conc Pavement For Conc. Pavement For AC Pavement ' Ot tan of rse A r aked surface �.B'dawb f� : otter 1:6 }R , r � Final surf. of p�here v l set 4' m Conc ' esurfoc t �"• Mom 1 toyer tore arer m nO nq _ •I % *"" D dtncted. l0 s& 6• W -• ce l layer tar paper on Eanbn 'see— ' -3'co PLAN Romp wrlxi lo be sense ee6.0' AC 3 tale. pav where directed' c p^^t 3• • as sulk or b PO All dowels Sc c. TYPE F•I ar. O.a$3nl m m narmel TYPE F s ' 4'rarmol l' O.ISyft For AC in on Conc. Pavement For AC island on Conc Pavement I S'mtn Ciufler ono general purpose Curb --�` //�� ' T Hipmps for bikeways r• }p, GENERAL NOTES FOR CONCRETE CURBS to be lull width a .lDwels �•qatkyy,� te l•6 ELEVATION SECTION A-A s ' do 4,:!! FIinal r surf. o1 par. I Curb Escrows . E • • 7 normal. Vary as shown On plans of as directed = surlecin T _— here nOwred 2. Face @Ott,r normal D. shown for cure type• Vary as shown pis plans • Eaistmg AC par. a m E relied. 3 N1gnl • 11 variable as shown an plans or as di . TYPE G 4 igialpac.sg Eaponston, 200'maumum end all pe nn of tangency, For AC island on AC Pavement Contraction, IS maximum. 5 Inuteittgas shall be used in connecting curbs of difrersnt exposures • E. I E Ike fetal vertical dimension of mole curb surfaces hoeing { LOngtluditl o slops a t I:1 or neepsr.) Minimum ' WWI desirable transition length al D a n W 20' f or taco 1 m 'E Fatal surf at pas � �" 9 d 1 _ Resurfacing 6 W normal. (Curbs A Al) A•I) • le' noal. Vary as shown on ploys on as directed. • when required Usti AC Oar 7. Mud all curls shall slope torord the roadway 002' normal unless Otherwise shown or os directed 8 Dowels: All i,1e length as Mown. In new cant. mina set dowels before TYPE G-I exams burdens In •tatmg rant pevmt drill holes Ira and grout For AC Island on AC Pavement dowels in In AC Poem' drive dowels. • • Page 1 of 3 . GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS, POLELINE PIPELINE, AND BURIED CABLE PERMITS APPLICANT Boston Chicken NW LP HIGHWAY 1W M.P. 10.288 Worksite: X 3) Applicant must call for utility locates before digging ( 1800 - 332 -2344 ). You may be held liable for damages. X 4) Applicant shall have a copy of this permit and all attachments at the work site. They shall be available to District Maintenance Manager or representative at their request. X 5) Permit inspection fees are estimated to be 320.00 (order to render service.) A deposit of this amount submitted to the District office will be required prior to beginning of work. Charges will be made on an actual cost basis. _ 6) Contractor to acknowledge receipt of and review of, by letter, the Oregon Administrative Rules (Chapter 734 -55) governing miscellaneous facilities and operations on the highway right of way as the governing provisions of this permit or agreement. _ 7) Access control fence must be maintained during construction and restored to it's original or better condition after construction is complete. X 8) The permittee shall not use the right of way to display advertising signs or merchandise of any kind. X 9) The stopping and parking of vehicles upon State Highway right of way for the maintenance of adjoining property or in furtherance of any business transaction or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. _ 10) All grass and small brush within the work area shall be rotary or flail mowed to ground level prior to the beginning of work to facilitate clean up. Disturbed areas shall be reseeded with grass native to the area in an appropriate seeding time. X11) The spreading of mud or debris upon any State Highway is strictly prohibited and violation shall be cause for immediate cancellation of the permit. Clean up shall be at applicant's expense. The highway shall be cleaned of all dirt and debris at the end of each work day, or more frequently if so determined by the District Manager or representative. X12) All equipment shall be parked off the right -of -way or in areas acceptable to the District Manager or representative. X13) Permittee shall replace any landscape vegetation or fences that are destroyed. Any damage that is not fully recovered within one year shall be replaced by ODOT at the expense of the penmittee. _ 14) Applicant shall obtain an application and Permit for Trimming or Spraying Trees prior to the cutting of trees and brush on the highway right of way (applications are available at the District Office). _ 15) Applicant will install and maintain landscaped area as shown on the attached drawings. Planting shall be limited to low growing shrubs, grass or flowers that do not attain sufficient height to obstruct clear vision in any direction. The commission or Engineer shall have the right to remove said landscaping at any time such removal may appear to the Commission to be in the public interest, without liability of loss, injury, or damage of any nature whatsoever. Traffic: X 16) The work area during construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto. Flaggers must have a card or certificate indicating their completion of an approved work zone traffic control course. X 17) Contractor to provide a detailed traffic control plan for each place of the work, showing signs and cones. Plans to be submitted for approval by the District Manager or representative Sam Hunaidi in advance of construction or maintenance. x C Q A Applicant initial's 1 1110 • _18) Contractor shall maintain all existing traffic control devices during construction, then re- install permanently per MUTCD standard and District Manager specifications. X 19) All damaged highway signs shall be replaced by the Highway Division at the expense of the applicant. _20) Freeway traffic control shall be done by State forces at the expense of the applicant. Advance planning and notification required due to work schedule of highway maintenance crews. We require at least two weeks advance notification to schedule traffic control. X 21) No work will be permitted on the roadway during hours of darkness, nor between 6:00am and 9:00am, or 3:00pm and 6:00pm without prior authorization of the District Manager or representative. _22) Hours of work shall be Drainage: X 23) On site stonn drainage shall be controlled within the applicants property. No blind connections to existing state facilities. _24) Excavation shall not be done on the ditch slopes. Trench excavation shall either be at ditch bottom or outside the ditch area. _25) When excavation is in ditch bottom with slope greater than 6 %, erosion protection shall be used with 2 "-0 size rock laid and compacted in the bottom of ditch and side slopes to a minimum depth of 6" or as directed by the District Manager or representative. _26) Only earth or rock shall be used as fill material and shall slope so as not to change or adversely affect existing drainage. Fine grade and seed the finished fill with native grasses to prevent erosion. _27) A storm drainage study will be required by a licensed Hydrologist meeting the standards of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) when any of the following conditions apply: a) whenever a 4" pipe is inadequate to serve the developed area, b) development site is 1 acre or larger in size and directly or indirectly affects state facilities, c) or as directed by the District Manager or representative. _28) And advance deposit of $ (order to render service) is required for State Hydrologist to review and approve storm study calculations. _29) You will be required to provide `on site' retainage for storm water run -off that exceeds that of underdeveloped site. _30) Storm drainage study shall be a_ 10 year,_ 25 year,_ 50 year,_ 100 year,_ other,_ year. X 31) All water discharged to an ODOT storm sewer system will be treated prior to discharge. All requests for connection to an ODOT storm sewer system will meet any requirements of the-National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System that could include: local jurisdiction approval of on -site water quality treatment facilities, development of an operation and maintenance plan for any on -site water quality treatment facility as determined by local jurisdiction. Excavation /Construction: X 32) Open cutting of pavement shall only be allowed in areas specifically approved by District Manager or representative. _33) Trench Backfill in surface shall be according to the typical attached as Exhibit X 34) Open cutting of the highway will be allowed with construction in accordance with OAR 734 -55 -040. All excavation in paved areas shall be back filled and the roadway surface patched before the end of each shift. Temporary patching shall be cold mix, and permanently hot mix patched within Two Weeks of cut. "T" trench typical attached. The permittee shall be fully responsible for maintenance of temporary patching. (see "T' trench typical in other side) X 35) Compaction test will be required for each open cut or for every Two Layers of a continuous trench by standard AASHTOT99 method. At the discretion of the District Manager or representative results of such tests shall be given to District Manager or representative at applicant's sole cost. CAS— �S- Applicant initial's 2 . • XX 36) Controlled Density Fill (CDF) shall be used as surface back -fill material in place of crushed rock in open trenches that affect the travel portions of the highway. A 3/4" rock will be used for the aggregate. The • amount of concrete used shall not exceed 3% of the total mixture's weight. Maximum compressed strength must not exceed 100 -150 psi. X 37) Surface restoration shall be a minimum of 4" of hot AC compacted in 2" lifts, or match existing AC depth, whichever is greater. XX 38) All rock shall be from a source that is certified by the state. _39) An overlay to seal an open cut area shall be completed prior to the end of the construction season, or when minimum temperature allows. Typical overlay shall cover the affected area from edge of pavement to edge of pavement to edge of pavement and taper longitudinally with the highway as a function of highway speed on each end (i.e. 55mph highway section shall have a 1 -1/2" in 55' taper). Taper may be adjusted by the District Manager as required. For a period of two years following this patching of the surface, the applicant shall be responsible for the condition of said pavement patches, and during that time shall repair to the District Manager or representative's satisfaction any of the patches which become settled, cracked, broken, or otherwise faulty. X 40) All highway crossings shall be bored or jacked. Bore pits shall be located behind ditch line or in areas satisfactory to the District Office. Unattended pits shall be protected by a 6' fence or shall be backfilled or steel plated and pinned. 41) Lines that are bored or jacked shall be encased in steel casing, 4" minimum in size, meeting A.S.T.M. a 139 B (no hydro) specifications and shall have a wall thickness meeting recommendation in the N.U.C.A. "Horizontal Earth Boring and Pipe Jacking Manual No. 2" 1986 edition. _42) Trench backfill outside of ditch line or in approved areas can be native soil compacted at optimum moisture in 12" layers to 90% or greater of the maximum density. X 43) Native materials found to be unsatisfactory for compaction shall be disposed of off the project, and granular backfill used. 44) Trench backfill in rock slope or shoulder shall be crushed 1 "-0 or 3/4 "-0 size rock compacted at optimum moisture in 12" layers to 95% of maximum density by standard AASHTO T99 method. X 45) Where excavation is on fill slope steeper than 2:1 slope protection shall be used with 4 "-0 size rock laid evenly to a minimum depth of 12 ". X 46) No more than 300' of trench longitudinally along the highway shall be open at any one time and no trench shall be left in an open condition overnight. X 47) Areas of disturbed cut and fill slopes shall be restored to a condition suitable to the District Manager. Areas of erosion to be inlaid with an acceptable rip rap material. X 49) All underground utilities shall be installed with a 3' or more clearance from guardrail post and attachments. _50) Signs and pedestals shall be placed as near the highway right of way line as practical. In no case shall pedestals and line markers be located within the highway maintenance area. _51) No cable plowing is allowed within the lateral support of the highway asphalt (i.e.: at 6' lower than the edge of the asphalt, no plowing within 9' of the edge of the asphalt). _52) All pipe and bridge attachment hardware shall be hot dip galvanized and threaded area shall be painted with an approval coating following assembly. 53) Expansion joints of an approved type to be located in the close proximately with the expansion joints of the structure. _54) Adhesive anchors only are acceptable for support brackets -two acceptable adhesive anchors are listed on the attached sheet. • 55) Field drilled holes in the'stiffeners and areas damaged by drilling shall be painted with two coasts of zinc - rich prior to assembly. _56) Neoprene gaskets to be placed between the mounting plates and stiffeners. X 57) Plans are approved in general only. Field changes may be required by the District Manager or representative. xCAR Applicant initial's 3 • • • IlIIIreg ' Jan. 17, 1995 r ``v L^ 1 ' { ( , JAN 2 :a 1995 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Boston Chicken NW LP Attn. Chris Lind 1111 Main Str. , Suite # 560 District 2A Vancouver, WA. 98660 Maintenance Supervisor FILE CODE: Ref: Road Approach Permit. Dear Mr. Lind, • Attached is /are your application(s) for a Road Approach Permit . The application(s) must be signed by the owner or contract purchaser, and a local government official. Please obtain the appropriate signatures and return the application along with the items checked below for further processing by Jan.25. 1995 . X Administrative Fee (Each) Amount 50.00 X Inspection Fees (Total) Amount 320.00 X Certificate of Insurance (of the contractor who will be performing the work). X Permit Performance Bond(Total) Amount $ 10,000.00 N/A Advance Deposit to review detention design & calculation(received). Please keep in mind that this does not constitute an approved permit. An approved permit will only be issued after receipt of the signed application(s) and complete forms. If you have any further questions or wish to discuss any provisions of the permit, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely Sam H.Hunaidi i . District Permit Specialist PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97225 -0412 734 -1897 (10 -92) (503) 229-5002 ... • • r • :. go - . . g N 7 . ph, i • i , 4 _ _ • ( /,//%1: _____ I .13 / / el -LI 1 nt IF am _ / // / r 1 1 11. : i- / - ----, lt IBOSTON CH , 1. . - - Do Ha . _ i / Ai.w; • \\\\\\* / \ \\\ \ / ENTER tf Ce) 5 0 rss61 lo / / / / / . + - c h kl.fe,v) ..fv h .e . Y 1, / A pd-7}/ / r ....._Pi-ii>e ye \ ■ 4 • • \ • Q.3) u "' • 2.-,•, 11.1 f P , _ _ . F —71 __ -4 . / 4 / > (111 IL I 11111:2!L ------ f / 1 • .---"--'- - U 1 W , I (it /-7 , , ,./ . • < 20 ID' 12' 6 - 151 2-1' 4_16' W-6 . 115' la. i 21.,1“ -1.-1^ 50 P ' , .; ,. ., , , , - ,i6, / w 2 : . PROPOSE0 I .-- i -- ",:- -2- ±-: ::: 1 1 / / 0 z 2 n II 7.7:7;: ( ICKEN : • • 3,561 S.F. . 1 ,---- r ■,. ------ DWI * ' / , a t c Z 19 d '41 [ . cl, ....,, < a l I / /' / q.•\ .„/ / a ° . - , / i's, / - - • -- Eo guolu) 11:3.11(T (" . " 7.-------1' -1 ' (,--- • / / / / v • I 1,,, • ,,, c p d * . f , .,.. / / t. /y ' 4 - // • 0 . 0 - ' / al a; CC ril u) 6 ,, e?,/;/ \ \\\ it.; , ' / \ \)\ '. 7 /\ • ' :. 'i \I / E F E° 1 . / Ala / /61 / I 0 ■ ■ . / -1 / 4N Cr ----4_ ..Z • / 24" _. , , • / , //- / /,/ / / ' e ,..--/ // / , .-:,•/ ?. /// / / , , (op , / 1 / / / // , ' N N rttrt- / • q y A-,5 0 0 1 1 / i , 11 .I) ,,. till ■ TO ArDJ -I -0T / / / f / •':( 1 • .,,,, --.-------,..„ , . . • • I ,/''' N /// el N N, _.__..;, ET -- .1 / // /Cc-0 - 1 C(4 / ( / . . . :. • /../ / ••., .` a Z ./. , 0 , N N EXISTING / / / 4 Cio o ci , _ , BUILDING ...- / ,_ 0 / 4 Al C e b .c. Ali ,.S 7 7 • ..---, , / / ■ . ,........._. y v..... N 1 j 7 , . .. • .: \ \ 4..,..t., (1.2E5 ACRES) 514 S 56..F. f el • ; ----__...-' . . ..7.EA : 3,361 S.F. W li N ;# . -....„__ / IDED ! 51 5. , PAGES ta . ---_____ . 41 IA .... FROVIDED : 2 SPACES r ,.. . , I ..., ,......„ / .._ „....,..,. _ ,...._. 7 / ________ : 1, PRovIDED : 51 SPACES F O 7 ‘ \\ 47 / - -. . 1 10 : 1155 SPACES /1,000 S.F. Q S `- ..' E : .0 % a... • $) t : . • l. i "‘ ----- • // A9CDonc? S-1- _.._ 5— ________ • r ' Creative Solutions ... Superior Service pAciFic I • ; �r 8405 S.W. N' b us Ave. • • Plannin •Surveying • Environmental p p, fox 80a� (503) 626-0455 8 Portland, OR 97280 Fax (503) 326-0775 • Engineering • Landscape Architecture Services To 1.On Y.._ PAPA- E - .— �_..._ Date: i 1 e - q4 . 1y cr. t FFc rt+ 4 . .. A' S Sc,C Project Number: /F- /..4. 3 V - Of 3 d f ($).p+ S c1.1 V 0,-47 7 -57. S c.." c re k Project Name: Q C 1 ^ 7 G ,4-ri o p -r -0 ? i a R , 9 2 L 9 -_ Regarding: PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY AT (S03) 626.0455 IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION We Arc Sending: These Are Transmitted: Copied To: —_ ttached 1 I For Your Info/File • • -- - Liellacsimile 9.- 3- -)-LC Li As Requested - -- • -- . - Number Of Pages Including Cover I .1 For Rey iew And Comment _— i ( �' Copies � Description .. - - - - - -. _ -- I i T k C 0 ( i O 1 . 4 C C a 1.. c S G • " / d $ / 1-r !YZ Mc' — -- . _- -.. ........._.. _ 7 .- . - ... . Comments e t'C A-cdA TLek-v■ ._ __CA I.-1-C-- ..QE. 0 PrI4-0 _ -. . &CV> •. CAi Y3`C yopia. r.' e r • 7 0 . OE .. Dr 5PoS0-ro o n+aS) .7.. OF•cSt >-E . .... _ -. . Si &ned _.._ - _..._... __ -._ - • 0 0 ( ) . • fl O. dt)- . - • . OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION STORM SEWER DESIGN SHEET - - • FULL AND PARTIAL - FULL FLOW ' pD PROIECT.DQSW"t Ce - Ek 1414 Tic.ma.0 DESIGN FREQUENCY: 14 ' R - DESIGNED 13 '' '.* rc D ATE: 13.-8 -•ei 4 - - Drainaxe Basins Runoff Equiv. Area Total Time of Total Average Design lovers T Pipe ` Capacity Velnciiy Invert Tap of O ' index - Area Coeff. fee 100% Drainage Concern. ram of Rainfall Discharge, Slupe Size Flowing Flowing Length Fall Elevation Manhole Remarks - -- Na Runoff Fuca or Coecenl. Intensity Full Full Elevation t Flow Time acres (3) x (4) acres minutes minutes inch/hr. cfs % inches cfs fps feet !eel 1 2 3 4 S 6 • ] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1e 19 A , - - - 0.13 0.1.5 0.03 t3.1 0.90 0.49 0.21 S 5 2..4o o -SS 1.0 G•'" 0.4t 3.10 2-) 0.2. 113 ( - x.8.9b .t*- am O•q• 0.04 0,15 67.1 5 1. SS d.G4 (.4 G" 0.'n :3 -'66 lop t.40 t . c i - 14 .10 3.1).00 „__JJf 0.5 5'.7 . I . 0.1$ _ O•t10 0. - o .to OA 0, 09 _ }} 0----.--1 O.os 0.1 o• v t E �_ -� bolt o.Ro 0.04 0.34 S S .•C.O O. Zo'L h 6" 1 (164 4.40 e . c 1 - 941. Lv 1 - 1 . 0.-S"' 1 S. ia4G • _ ' 0 . 0.04 - 6.0) 0.1S" 0.0I 4.....____.... o • o.us a` O o • l 3 .0.$3 S. 3..4 3 2.0) (As" to" 2-17 1 4.00 too' - - >F 144 .t • F O . S3 8.'7 i 3---- �� O.t' ass D -p� _ o-. aK A.02 0.94 f3.7 I.`tb I.1G .LGo to Q? S..44 `71. - . • 4 _ o 0 0 ` g 0. 1 571 I. 9S I• - 14 i-G? I -" .C.6 s'8 �t - c _ /o -o, • !4 4 - • • 1. .1 - I Form 81- 734.3918 - 4 DEC-08-'94 19:06 ID:110PACIFIC - PDX TEL NO:5032744607 #539 P03 : . - " ... ............_. .. . _ . .... ....... ..N.. . i'• '' . • ..... ..... ........" . • ' glifr . N AI `'■ ■ • • 7„,,,L‘. N s1 0 V. Lit-Ni 1 S 0' 011 41 IV 11 42' ''' /\ A ...I tos S7' (185.0 M 7' ---....•• . ,. ..... . , 1.010.1.........1,...m.wwwo . .:.__ e -.„..- • 7 % ‘. . . . . . . 4 4 E110 4 . V atbi. . 6 0 X - "IV ' •Vill . 1 :. Mf • ,..,......,_ ' ..... tRibl i‘ 's "•-•.. --.:::- "A.,„ . 0 , . ...., ..... .L.,_. -... ........ • .- \_ ..... „ lieb■...ilingrati.-.....: ' Itio,.. ---•--.... ..._......... ............ ......, • W-;„, :re' . d 4 . 6 " ."...... *::.... " 'Ir •...4MINMewemoree■•••••..................::::.='aii , • 3. 10 C4 t C ...Nei ea I " ,. r . ° 1 i S • ill if .i IN: 1111 to ; 71 • • .... 6 , 0 3., r '' ...........-1..... T . N . . g ,t 0 # 10$11 Is NI .0 ip t . :6; ,12 - 6 410k I . q lii. 4 f. I kg IP 4 ■ dk -: '■ -0. ---- ------------ 6 ' - ' Ate A44 A , - m 4 ''' f 4 .. 0 ...o.' 0.0 1 .r,:oret:411.,,,--Ak, ielfti N • .. 414". . 4; . 3 I ..' tint ■ / i 41P it 111‘.. iiii ;11.... 1 i 4: ----- ,,, ' i• . 4. \ .. ! . r ' • m2 .1 lqi, ' :p L. OP:411; LI II . --........ 1. o• '. S' . 44', ,,. • • O ' '. 4, • 0 k 0 .1 ,...,. .- ,. i., 4: ., • . .. • ; -- "•7 -D ...z - A. , ! ,, ,...: . !op 1 i ..---- • .1111 * . ..:,-- II c., \ - ‘ .1° ,4111 11 Crk\ / J . * % t is ' imi ...J1.--/ 1114 — ..- '- 4 - 111161 11111. ...IINZ■111A . ilk ,, 6. 7 or .i,,. . 7 .... .,_.•... .. 1 r I. / A .. , :' e e \ • • 4 4 • e ' • • • • ' . . ) • 1 , 1 0* ...., . F W Illik\ A \ ■. .... 41111 4116 .41w4:7:...y. - ....,..w r.zoid i S 0407,r;i4r4Ito., , .- - 0, - r ..::::::::::::::::::.....:.::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::.:::::::::::::::::::::: i 6, L •N ! .....„. „. 4 0 : 1 1 ....,.,..... • ,, 0 1 . :•:.:.:•:.:::::::;::::.;.. • 1::::.::: • I ., , , 11 hh,lir; 1 ' ` $-' 1 r 1 ' :':',.:':': , . :::::::::::'::::::::::::::::::. ' I" : ' i'uniMill 44111111 , 111111! 4 i I ( -- Eire, -.. ;"‘ '. It, ., • ci 2 ••••.Y.'.v.'.',.:::.: .4k::.:.:.: . ;. A P -4, '4-.4 .. ii ' c , itHi;:l.:;:::?:::::::::::i.imimigall111111111/0141101111111111. 1 ..> 6 !;.1:;:...'1.---111111111apitakill iicItAga 0 ,,. ..' ;., pw'i 1 ,•.- It 4 '•%. ,-. .:.:, ';;,....::.:• ° irl . - .4' II • e , • t• . Ot..4.' / \ .. i:. ..... . • ::.: . ,., 0 NE „ —mom tp t p NI , , li til . , r °1 ■ ': . ! . : . ::::;:•:•::.t.:4::E.: : .;.. .::: .t, imigE, 1111111..... .. _. - .t 1:..1 i . 4 ,,Itigi I 41k " :‘ '' - ::::.. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :7.... - ,'"‘._....11.01 11 WII„. " 0 . 4.141z, , dk • . mu! 41ht '---... 4, , .:::,..::::::::::.:.:.:,......:,,,„ • .x.:.:.:.:.:.: • 1.11 2,4_ N 4 .). X 4 : • 1 1 ' 1 - - I .: ° I; ''..S,:.;:::;;:::::.;.%:.:::,:::::.V.V.'.%:',:::::.:::::::::::i: gliblIMIBMI . .. . • •■:* 11 1 ,...%... i 11) ■,, .:.:..., , ...,.....,...............,......,. i" "".......qmplatillg ,. • ' 1 . , Q‘ 1 N`.... ......"4:°::::P...;1101111110D., • . .:i:: :::i:::.:X:::: . mialinairdirr .ii0 A • C4 . '-....t ;;::: $1 iRr4,57•;•' . to 4 r , -........momoreAllwd 10 ,. )0 , lIFIFfilirrn...777:rerjp•- y .!, 4.s., ■ 1 r-= lird NIV3110111 /11151/11V:74,..1, v N.‘`.‹NINa%Ns4c,.:::.s.•17,,,,.: .•....74‘4.114/4 4i 0 1 r 11 7 If . . ro . li ' App 41 ., sZco i 14 . .. .:.. L N Aii■ (i■ :Jo 10- ' , •N s,..,,, :t • N, `Ns. .".• .46 it,.. .‘ I i,. rill , v7, , .. .- '''‘•-• v I 6 N '-4 ,. t 4.`764 ZI r Al' V . N., , 44 . 14 ■‘ 0 kt Ii 4 N* , ir/ • / 101 --\ - ' 1 4 1 t 9 ' 11%. . If, - 4 4 ‘ 6 t`:' 1 11,1 ' •■ j4411144, CI ' ' ' , • -;.:. _,,- & g N, , c . " . . ■ . As, NA..N■ • ' N I, . ..... '....;., 41 A . ...... 9 N s. ' • , tily .1)6 A") v.,,.. •.:41,,,, . . .. N,N in nt • !Y.. - • . . . ,,,,.. ...,.... • r � • �(IgT1N6 � \ �- Post -IN Fax Note 7671 Da )- -fit � asp 1 516NA6E r _ T r4}1" G o d� l� F'°� 8 E tG rvi n ki-•t TO REMAIN J t 4 NtKxw Plwno Y G k—O F S S' // / ∎� w • fax Y � �' 3 �)- fax / / % % / / E XISTIN G PARKlT1 L O+�T ,!IS �,O BC ST `w • RE STRtPPER TO l'►T'S 016 lW°4L R ' / REFER TO G1,VIL �+N� / O— E1`,l61 • ---- - - - - -- p. NY OY} IEt2 �+DDI"T'IcON IN % i, ; • C u! t C L - eor - - "�d dK P s c u s,s .- '` / ` v � S. % % • j per, ;-sZ- Q Q .- . ``�' - - ,� • 2 EXISTING PANT • .. • STRIITIN } • skit . . . EX1TIj16 . ' • r • °CUSTOME=R — .,.y,, WnLt_ PA•RKINF • • '' ''.°?' . 1 XI STI NS , • - NO TNR11. i ; • �_: • NGE. `pr ./A- j~ % 1 �� • TRAFFIC '\ 1 . ' \ ` ,` . ■ ■ • ip 3 O Iw � • A , 1 . 1 11 1 1 ` � 1 `` I - . 0 ; 4. AF .(- 51 .- .:. • ,i ,.....,-........ . ../... •G 9 T1A1d '� ■ 14 ... . .. . . - - Y �O R7= t-IAti 1) i . • /7-1. T i Rim M ; • ise r. s e• r4 • - .. . 11- .- �. ` -, cA, January 4, 1995 Mr. Harry Jeffery The Christian Marketplace 13975 -A S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: NWC Pacific Hwy. /Gaarde, Tigard, OR - Driveway Configuration Dear Harry: Thanks for your comments on the Easement Agreement. I have made arrangements to have your comments incorporated into new originals which will first be signed by BC Northwest management then forwarded to you for your signature and subsequent review by the two attorneys (i.e., your personal attorney and lender's attorney). BC Northwest is prepared to pay for all reasonable attorneys' fees in connection with their review of the new originals, predicated on final documents (acceptable to BCNW) being fully executed. We anticipate that the aggregate review time should take no more than a few hours. I will provide an acknowledgment letter for your Lender to indicate its review and approval of the documents when forwarding the originals for your signature. On another matter, the width of the driveway opening on Gaarde Ave. will be reconfigured to measure 65 feet as proposed in the Exhibits you reviewed. I have enclosed a magnified version for you to get a better understanding of how the driveway apron will be reconstructed. The City of Tigard will not allow a wider driveway opening than what we have proposed. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Sincerely, BC NORTHWEST, L.P. Cleon J. Pant Real Estate Director r (206) 750 -1130 1111 Main Street, Suite 560 Vancouver, WA 98660 . 9\1 OV-le