The URL can be used to link to this page

SDR1994-00018 ill I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, )V\ ^/�,. ft€e . i L OJfV, , being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) f That I am a &t � � 4.4 �1 C � y for The City of Ti rd, Oregon. J That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: / That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: 1./ of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit 'A') was mailed to each named ,e,_sons at thedciress _ _s hown on the attached list marked exhibit 'B' on the '41' "' day A IOI�X of 19 V , said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as here o tached, was postedon an appropriate bulletin board on the 1 day of , 3,9 Y" ; and depo ited in the United States Mail on the II day of An 19 , postage prepaid. Prepared Notice Sub bed and sworn /affirmed before me on the /7 of , 19 . V OFFICIAL SC,'rL �_... /L� / '� .. / it /e NOTARY PUBLIC •'EGO tt : �:s DID ?sf n7.:�Ln�tS j �'/?/yS'_ � NOTARYPti { Commission Tres : COMMISSION NO.00897 7 1 4`� 'Y COMMISSION EXPIIrS SEPT. 7, It39i �. . -- e A- CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION /MAZATLAN RESTAURANT APPLICATION: The applicant requests approval of a major modification to the approved Site Development Review to allow construction of a 1,445 square foot building addition to an existing 3,223 square foot restaurant. The applicant proposes to revise the interior floor plan and exterior architectural elevations to use an Early California Mission architectural theme for the restaurant. Zone: C -G (General Commercial). Location: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). The site is located along the north side of SW Pacific Highway, northeast of the intersection of the Tigard Cinemas. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right -of -way of SW Pacific Highway (99W). A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of the building permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall remove and replace the existing driveway approach and public sidewalk as shown on the site plan. The sidewalk shall be eight feet wide as measured from the face of curb. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream storm drain system will not be unduly affected by the on -site storm drainage run -off. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 4. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the northern side of Pacific Highway or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 5. Revised site /landscape plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: a. Provide one additional street tree within the planter strip area along the eastern property line. b. The buffer area along the western property line shall be modified to provide the following: A continuation of the buffering arborvitae planting along the western property shall be provided to screen the restaurant from the existing residence to further screen and buffer the site from adjoining residential uses. c. A total of 52 parking spaces are proposed. The site and landscape plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of 54 parking spaces. d. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed improvements on the site plan comply with the clear vision requirements. NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 - 0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 1 • e. Additional review shall be provided for appropriate points of pedestrian access to adjoining properties. An additional walkway shall be provided from the subject property to tax lot 501. f. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, waste assessment, comprehensive recycling plan or franchised hauler review and sign- off. g. The landscape plan shall be revised to show landscaping along the western property line towards SW Pacific Highway. h. The site plan shall be revised to locate bicycle racks so as to not conflict with pedestrian walkways. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY 7. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Assistant Planner. 8. Plans shall be submitted to the Tualatin Valley Fire District for review and approval of hydrant locations. STAFF CONTACT: Gene Birchill, Plans Examiner (526 2502). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Background: The site is presently developed with the Mazatlan Restaurant. The city has no previous records of development applications for this property. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is located on the north side of SW Pacific Highway northeast of the intersection of the Tigard Cinema. The property is zoned C -G (General Commercial). Properties to the east, west and north are zoned C -G. Adjoining properties are developed with a mixture of commercial and residential uses. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site has street frontage exclusively on SW Pacific Highway. The site is developed with an existing restaurant. Adjoining properties to the east, west, north and south are developed with commercial uses. The addition and remodel of the restaurant is expected to generate 20 or more additional vehicle trips to the site daily which requires a major modification review to the previously approved site development plan for the site. 4. Other Staff Comments: The Engineering Division has provided the following comments concerning this proposal: Findings: NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 - 0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 2 • i 1. STREETS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared by Keech Associates, Inc., Consulting Traffic Engineers, dated September 12, 1994. The report analyzes the effects of the additional traffic that will be generated by the proposed site improvements at the existing driveway and the impact to the traffic on SW Pacific Highway, a state highway. The report concludes that the additional traffic will not significantly affect the traffic utilizing SW Pacific Highway, nor the existing driveway located with -in the jug handle at the traffic signal intersection. The report further indicates that the traffic exiting the Tigard Cinema will continue to need the existing traffic signal. No improvements are recommended. The applicant shall obtain a revised ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Pacific Highway. The highway has been constructed to current state standards and no additional right -of -way or street construction is required. However, the sidewalk width is substandard and the applicant should be required to construct a new sidewalk to a width of eight feet, consistent with the existing new sidewalks in the area. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along both sides of SW Pacific Highway and the applicant should place the facilities located along this frontage underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The existing eight inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Pacific Highway and has sufficient capacity to serve this development. 3. STORM SEWER: Currently, the site is partially covered by the existing building and an asphalt concrete parking lot that both drain in a southerly direction toward SW Pacific Highway. The proposed site development will decrease the amount of impervious area. The applicant is advised that the state typically requires on -site detention in order to connect to the existing underground storm drain systems in all state highways. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Requiring surface water quality facilities on small sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the city. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depressions or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities. Regional facilities, funded by fees in -lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. Therefore, the applicant should be required to pay the fee in -lieu of constructing an on -site facility. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this proposal and stated that an exterior lighting plan for the perimeter of the building and parking lot shall be submitted for review and approval. The applicant provided plans to the Police Department in response to this concern. 5. Agency Comments: The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this application and provided the following requirements based on their review of the site plan and traffic study: NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 3 • 1. Half street curbs, gutters and sidewalk improvements need to be made. 2. On site detention is required if the applicant proposes to connect to ODOT's drainage system. 3. Cross over easements with adjacent properties should be provided, upon redevelopment of these properties. The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and requested that plans be submitted for review and approval of hydrant locations. The Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed this proposal and has stated that storm drainage and water quality treatment should be treated on -site. Erosion control should be in accordance with the. February 1994 E.C. Handbook. The Building Department, the Tualatin Valley Water District, GTE and the Advanced Planning Division have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct additional dining room area to an existing restaurant. A restaurant use is a permitted use as allowed under Section 18.62 (Use Classifications) as provided under the permitted uses provided for under the General Commercial Uses. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot area and the minimum lot width shall be an average of 50 feet for parcels in the C -G zoning district. The site has an average parcel width of approximately 120 feet which exceeds the average width standards of the C -G zone. The site is approximately 30,568 square feet. The C -G zone allows a maximum of 85% of the site to be developed with buildings and impervious surfaces. The applicant proposes lot coverage of 77% of the site for coverage with impervious surfaces which complies with the standard. Setback and Height: Section 18.64.050 states that there is no front yard setback. There is no side yard setback facing the street. The side and rear yard setback shall be 20 feet where a C -G zone abuts a residential zoning district. As indicated on the site plan, setback requirements for the new additions are satisfied. The C -G zone allows a building height of up to a maximum height of 45 feet. The proposed building addition contains architectural features with a maximum height of 25 feet which complies with the standard. The building also complies with the special setback requirements for new development along SW Pacific Highway which is 50 feet from the centerline of SW Pacific Highway. The addition would be located a minimum of 95 feet from the centerline of SW Pacific Highway. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100 requires that the applicant submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a minimum of 15% of the site. The applicant submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location, and shrubs and ground cover to be provided which indicated 22% of the site is proposed to be landscaped which complies with the standard. It is suggested that the property owner provide landscaping and ongoing maintenance for areas within the "jug handle turn around" island in SW Pacific Highway which creates an intersection for traffic traveling to the Tigard Cinema. This area appears to receive little maintenance. Generally, landscaped areas within adjoining publicly dedicated street NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 4 • . • rights -of -way are the responsibility of the adjoining property owner to maintain. It is also recommended that the landscape plan be revised to show landscaping along the western property line towards SW Pacific Highway. This area is presently a mixture of overgrown weeds and vines which also appear to receive little maintenance. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site has approximately 120 feet of frontage along SW Pacific Highway, therefore the applicant is required to provide street trees. The applicant shall provide a street tree within the landscape buffer along the eastern property line which is pruned to comply with the clear vision requirements. Screening, Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands which have been provided is three feet. Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Parking lot trees shall be designed to provide a minimum of one tree for each seven parking spaces. The applicant has provided one tree for each 5.70 parking spaces. The landscaped island areas measure a minimum of three feet in width. Much of the parking lot is screened from view from SW Pacific Highway due to the location of the restaurant in front of portions of the parking lot. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The matrix states that where a parking lot of 4 to 50 spaces abuts a residential development a required buffer and screening width of 10 feet shall be provided. The matrix also requires that where a commercial development abuts a residential area a buffer width of 20 feet shall be provided. The site abuts a residentially zoned and developed area along the western property line. A 10 foot buffer and screening area is required along the western property line for portions of the parking lot which abut a residentially zoned area. The existing site improvements include buffering and screening materials within a five foot six inch buffer area along the western property line. Portions of the existing restaurant are constructed at 13 feet to the property line which is also nonconforming. The matrix requires a 20 foot setback for commercial structures to residentially zoned property. These existing site improvements are nonconforming. Because the applicant has not proposed to increase the nonconforming status of these improvements it is recommended that improvements be made to the existing landscape screening materials within the existing buffer width. Given the size and maturity of the existing arborvitaes along the western property line the applicant has requested a reduction to the current NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 5 • • buffer requirement. The applicant has proposed to provide replacement arborvitaes to cover gaps in the screening, to cultivate soils, prune and add ground cover materials. The existing shrubs measure 12 to 18 feet in height, based on the size of the existing shrubs it is expected that the revised landscape plan will continue to provide sufficient screening and buffering. Provision of vinyl slats material within the existing chain link fence has also been proposed to further screen the restaurant from adjoining residential areas. It is recommended that additional arborvitaes be provided to further screen and buffer portions of the restaurant which abut a residential zoning district to the west of the site. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. Obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided all branches above three feet and below eight feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed improvements on the site plan comply with the requirement. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106 requires a minimum of one parking space for each 50 square feet of dining room area plus one space for each two employees. The plan indicates 2,556 square feet of dining room area is to be provided which requires 51 spaces. The applicant also states that six employees will work at the site which requires three spaces for a total of 54 parking spaces. A total of 52 parking spaces are proposed. The site and landscape plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of 54 parking spaces. To comply with this requirement the percentage of compact spaces may be increased to a maximum of 40 percent of the required parking rather than the current 23 percent. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires three disabled parking spaces if 51 to 75 parking spaces are provided. This proposed site plan shows the provision of three disabled person parking spaces in compliance with the requirement. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106 requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The revised site plan shall provide bicycle parking in accordance with the ratio which is determined for the required parking spaces. The site presently indicates the provision of four bicycle racks. Additional bicycle racks may be required if additional parking spaces are necessary. The racks proposed location may interfere with pedestrian walkways. It is recommended that the site plan locate the bicycle racks so as to avoid conflicts with pedestrian walkways. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one access onto SW Pacific Highway. The access provided is 30 feet in width with 24 feet paved NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 6 • • minimum, thereby satisfying this requirement. The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the current design and has not recommended changes to the design of the driveway onto SW Pacific Highway. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. Walkways shall be provided where feasible from adjoining developments. The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in which pedestrian access must cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots. Such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet when appropriate pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. Based on the limited number of parking spaces and aisles there are no appropriate locations for designated pedestrian crossings on this site. The site and landscape plan shall be revised to provide a pedestrian access point to the adjoining development to the northeast of the site. Signs: Section 18.114 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C -G zone. All new signage shall be reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on -site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick -up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, waste assessment, comprehensive recycling plan, or franchised hauler review and sign -off. The applicant shall comply with one of the approved methods of complying with waste disposal and recycling plan options. Transportation Planning Rule. The portion of the Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8, 1994, that applies to this application is OAR 660- 12- 045(4)(b). This section states that new retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit through the following measures: a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop or station; b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and, c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit stops. The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct, safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by removing other barriers to pedestrian access. Building entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct, safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development and the transit stop. New retail and office buildings located on transit streets should have at least one public entrance facing the transit street or, if not facing, be within a specified distance of the transit route. A combination of building orientation, distance and pedestrian amenities can work together to display and direct a person to NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 7 • • an entrance. The site addresses these issues by providing a building entrance which is clearly visible from SW Pacific Highway and served by transit uses. A walkway has been provided from the main entrance of the restaurant to SW Pacific Highway in compliance with the requirement. SECTION IV. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ONO - 2-I"7"1 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. ! The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. /d- , '7'� . 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639- 4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Assistant Planner \ 10-'/ APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers +Jff DATE Senior Planne NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 8 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a_ SPRUCE S I mini � .i. ui ,®. L'N II � W■ ST A I l a W F— a ■ m V 0 m - 1114 ._ n x 1.6116 • Z 1 , • - / 116IIIIIP Z ST Z 1 NM I OPPIP 0 • 0 Id I CC BAYLO - / R ill 90 v - c ------- / till! t0 1 1 III i MI . 0 -� C LINTON DARN_ I- mom " ^ U ST VICINITY CASE NO. . EXHIBIT M A P 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 • • A$ s' > 129.9 - --- - ° ® PROJECT INFORMA11O - -- 1 P( SULAM LEGAL OE9Ir81l I SE 1/1 SECT= 79. 11705190P IS �' �,g Hrb tarn _ �� IA id - I . 1 RANGE 1W. 11H. TAX LOT 300 < _ l � a 114 ADDRESS 11611 a ION Comm ACIFIC MORAY COMMERCIAL _�__ - - __n, w 2 LOT AREA 70. M — - - 1 11 1 YY ^"" I lll l l l l // R © e 5 i 201mq O �IK 1 (61 AT e' -0 • 011 4 ,I ` '. p E19 C- RESTAURANT a 1 3 5I 1 1 9UIDM0 AREA 7.734 wilt R i a R � 1 PAVED AREA 23.532 4 4. , L 1: S' , 06 0 I a , I .1 � 4 . ® y' 1 LANDSCAPED AREA 3,ee: wilt SEE M I '51E21I s1 j1 PROPOSED USE RESTAURANT 1 ,QY O AREA 4.319 R ~ PAVED AREA 3.999 Wt. PROPOSED AOOITION) • . . ... ..... • . . 4 ' ( 14330 wilt (1 •4e3 ammo 9 I �.. 1 LANDSCAPED AREA R - 22.52 9 I D Nom 41 , 17-0" 2 -C 17-0 - • 4 1- ALL UTni11ES ARE COSTING N PLACE 400 NOT REQUIRED TO BE 04A*1 OR RELOCATED 4911 DOS PROPOSAL - NEW - PARK IS PAO 1 SOURCE RC HIGHWAY TRAFFIC f G © 0 1 2- aNLr EXI51RlC OPT - ST1E NOISE S or* 27 �S (0057 3- THERE ARE NO TREES 0951100 ON 71E 511E 4111 MORE • LIMIER ram �I .. THAN 10 NNW DIAMETER AT A PONT 4e- ABOVE THE • �� r �` �� 1 SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ot1EA DIVING TREES Q Hi � I i . , . 1 i "" \ v v \ a �� i 1 / owTR*0 sou TAKE PREUUtIaa TO PEEVENr EROSION OF mL PRaY W r \ © • ®� , I THE SITE OURINO ANY EXCAVATION DELUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TIE e \ .... \ \ \�C.. \ GN IRAW BALES TIE 001101 a TIE SLOPE AT THE 1 ` ©_ ! ` 1 �+TM WSTAILATI PROP S UWE pmRINO AT ca 1SIwICTaN ac eunDOO *00*11 Ns :.. e �$ 9 1RFAQ WATEL1 YUIICPyp1T \� �$(:Q�'jL MONO PAVIO +ROOF AREA 23.909 wilt \ \ZIT : t PAVING + ROOF 23079 wilt mE' I 4 PROPOSED PAV \ .� PARKING REQUIRED - I SPACE POT 30 R OWN: _ \ .. A (2.333 R twit AREA \A..: ' `. __— -- —_ -- 19.12 GUNMEN \ I - 1 SPAA& 790 EMPLOYEES (e) 100 \ :• : © � yy I TOTAL REOUR D - 52.12 - _ - — _ • y \ �� a '' . 1 PARKING PROPOSE - REGULAR SPACES (II(I04. 1f-e"e 19 37 �- _ _ _ \ 'S ' ki A - M90FLCHAIR ACGII4ABEE NW 9 In - 3 ." \ ; ;; C - COMPACT 904 7-0' 4 15-01 12 (272) - TOTAL PROPOSED };TU•..' :. 1 KEY 1011 \ ;• .;.;. ©\® ASPHALTIC PAWS - ELOSi1N0 a I \`�:. �I• ASPHALTIC COERCE PAVNG - EXISTING TO BE REMOVED • 1. _ \ •N \ •. I !. » 9 ' i ce O ACCESS/11U ING ACCESS ISLE - 0'e 19' .....1 \ \ •• � I e 1 P APS ACQ35ABlE PARKING STALL - 9'e 10' PATH STANDARD 901 a. A ` y,,, \ �� ,e 0i 1 1 ® A S•a a VAN PARKING ACCESS ISLE - 9 e 19' 1 ' ► ►► , N 1 ; His , ;: ;'r': Q \ 1 : , . ® 0001700 BOIBOARO S-GN 3, 8 ilL •: ::4 : : • G l q •. l , ® WC50L RACK MN. CAPACITY (4)- BIKES o ^ 2E ildng �{: :tie. _ }': _ � !�3'• � - °. .. @' � 1).0 uTHN eASIN - coma AT STREET O MA fl � O ....".3 uTa BASIN _ NEW ' CC © f4 t! �1 ® SIGHT SCUROIG SLATS CAFE - OWING - INSTALL NEW c H • • rJ • .4 > ...:i" P ® TRASH OVMPST(8 / DELIVERY AREA (COST. CCH SLAB) IIIC • g _O 1 ' ORTIEWAY APPROACH -NEW - ID BE CONSiiNCTm N • C > g^ c m® .' •� - ACCORDANCE 19111 THE 3PE0EICAIXNS AND REOUIREYENTS CI ' a 9 D` y .. K THE an Cr TKIARD AND/OR THE STATE HIGHWAY DIV. 5 I' �; : V • -.•' 1 @ annum OOP GE,E CURB - COSTING Sr p _ , ti EON DISCOED CONCRETE CUB - NEW r 9 - EC1 i C © T Exmu0E0 =tam CURB - mono To BE REmovto ® GARDEN WALL - 4•-e- 1401 NM WOO TRELLIS STRUCTURE - NEW v✓ C> LOT UONT OH POE - E703TNG To MANN W PLACE • K : () LA eweD AREA - COSTING / NEW / OR REMODELED - SEE LAND C I ® LANDSCAPING BOOS CARDE N WALL - m BE C2MPCETED Br ono r 1 I ® 00STIN0 POLE SIGN To RFMAW W PUCE O • 1 • I sm PAWING 105 STRIPING -NEW �® 1 / sxLX wA - COSTING m • 0 caE REMAIN ' 1 () SLDEWAIx - NEW P /- cONCREIE ' SWEET SIDEWALX - NEW 5 HIDE ' © THE OTT O• TIGARD AND/CR THE STATE m CATIONS a ' I / ® 40EWAUC - 0=1140 024 1E m EC REMOVED 1 MOEN _ /.2� - Remodel of the In • TOgard Oregon PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT M A P SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 • 1S136DB -00200 1S136DB -00201 FRANCESCHI, KENNETH & JEROME DUANE COMPANY 37 SAN MATEO CT ATTN: TAX DEPT SAN RAFAEL CA 94903 PO BOX 42121 PORTLAND OR 97242. 1S136DB -00500 1S136DB -00501 .00MMERCIAL INVESTMENTS UNION GOSPEL MINISTRIES OF PTLD • } cazv N & GUITRON PARTNERSHIP % FRANCESCHI, JEROME & GENEVIEVE TR 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY FRANCESCHI, KENNETH & BARBARA TRS TIGARD OR 97223 37 SAN MATEO CT SAN RAFAEL CA 94903 1S136DB -00600 1S136DB -00700 ' TYSON, ALFRED J ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF THE LARSON, RAYMOND K NORTHWEST, INC 28275 NW DORLAND RD 3601 6TH AVE S HILLSBORO OR 97124 SEATTLE WA 98134 1S136DB -00800 1S136DB -00900 MORRIS, JOHN C DAISY E GENSMAN, MITCHELL EDWARD 11621 SW PACIFIC HWY 963 SW WESTWOOD DR TIGARD _ OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 • 1S136DB -01000 1S136DB -02200 GENSMAN, LEE R & ALICE L BAMBUSCH, GARY DEAN % GENSMAN, MITCHELL E & DEBORAH 11000 SW 74TH 963 WESTWOOD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 1S136DB -02300 1S136DB -02400 THORPE, RICHARD L LAURIE CHAMPION, RONALD V AND • 5606 SW CALIFORNIA ROBERTA E PORTLAND OR 97219 11642 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD OR 97223 1S136DB -02500 1S136DB -02502 PIERCE, GILBERT /GRACE ET AL PIERCE, GILBERT E TACO BELL #1091 F BY SUBWAY TIGARD INC BY GEORGE HAMMERSMITH 4840 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD 5989 SE JENNE LANE PORTLAND OR 97225 PORTLAND OR 97236 1S136DB -02600 1S136DB -02601 STEWART, PHYLLIS T AND ALPROP CO STEWART TRUST 6149 SW SHATTUCK RD 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR PORTLAND OR 97221 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 1S136DB -02602 1S136CA -01700 STEWART, PHYLLIS AND WATTS, KENNETH GILEBRT STEWART, DONATA AND PO BOX 230925 - COHEN, NATHAN TRUSTEES TIGARD OR 97281 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 1S136CA -01800 RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION MILNE REAL PROPERTIES, INC 2211 NW FRONT AVE S -202 P 0 BOX 2740 PORTLAND OR 97209 PORTLAND OR 97208 • • • • , c-sc.•:,, ( / \T \:\ • 4 GALVIN & GUITRON PARTNERSHIP 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD OR 97223 • %. 1' • ill 4 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SDR 94 -0018 FILE TITLE: MAZATLAN EXPANSION APPLICANT: Russell Construction OWNER: Galvin & Guitron Partnership 2211 NW Front Ave. Ste. 202 11619 SW Pacific Hwy. Portland, OR 97209 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan Restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4 819 square feet (1,465 sq. ft. addition), remodel ing of the interior and exterior, as well as parking a d landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The General Commercial zone allows Public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. CIT: East CIT REPRESENTATIVE: Joel Stevens PHONE NUMBER: 293 -1254 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: I i n X STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 3 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 ATTACHMENTS X VICINITY MAP X LANDSCAPING PLAN _ NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X SITE PLAN OTHER: GRADING PLAN VVlari STAFF CONTACT: Wk a - 639 -4171 JII 4IP 67r i4 iI 3 ( , uW Li At — ,� ! CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. SIx_ � ' OTHER CASE NO'S: ' ' RECEIPT NO. cAc__.2�.5- O ,, v ��rr�� sr • APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: ��/4...S. DATE: �t�0 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY. ication form (1) TIGARD, OR 97223 1 ( (B) Owner's signature /written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT N0.15136DB -500 authorization 1 f (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE .70 ACRES Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* GALVIN & GUITRON PTRSHP `('EJ - Plot-plan (pre -app checklist) ADDRESS 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY PHONE y( pplicant's statement CITY TIGARD, OR 97223 ZIP (pre -app checklist) APPLICANT* RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION INC. c tgrilst of property owners and ADDRESS 2211 NW FRONT AVE.STE202PHONE 238 -3413 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY PORTLAND. ZIP 97209 "116 fee (t4.345- ) *When the owner and the applicant are different Construction Cost Estimate people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DETERMINED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY C G 7C — G The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval' .to. N.P.O. Number: allow FYPQNcroN Awn REMODFT, OF EXTSTING 'Approval Date: RESTAURANT; PARKING AND LANDSCAPING • CHANGES Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: NONE 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of - 111��i� 19g SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. iLik/ AY404) • (KSL:pm /0524P) 1 maTnuguaDal 7/28/94 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Tigard, Or 97223 Re: SDR Application Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant 11619 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Or 97223 Mark; Per Application Check List and Land Use Notification Process packet, attached SDR package contains: 1. SDR Application signed by Norman Russell as applicant for Galvan Guitron Partnership, property owners. 2. Application Check List. 3. Owner's Authorization. 4. Title Transfer Instrument. No encumbrances or restrictions pertinent to proposed improvements are noted. Per our discussion, City of Tigard provides assessor's map. 5. Site Plan in 8.5" X 11" format. 6. Applicant's Statement. 7. SDR Filing Fee of $315. 8. Affidavit of Mailing, Copy of Meeting Notice Letter, mailing list to "owner's of Record" within 250 feet of subject parcel, plat map used to determine above. • 9. Affidavit of Posting Notice, Copy of Meeting Notice, Meeting Sign Up Sheet. 10. 16 copies Site Development and Information Plan in 18" X 24" format. This sheet has SDR Application Check List Information A) Site Information, B) Site Development, C) Grading Plan. Bike (4) rack and parking area islands with canopy trees provided per City comments. 503 - 228 -3413 FAX # 228 -2770 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE, SUITE 202 G PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 1 41/ �1 11. 6 copies of Architectural Elevations. Square Footages are noted on Site Plan. 12. 16 copies of Landscape Plan. Erosion control measures are noted on the Site Plan. No Sign Drawings are provided because existing sign remains. Because total impervious area is decreased, Surface Water Management Fee should be reduced. Power, gas, water, and sewer connections are existing. Thank you for your previous and ongoing assistance. Sincerely, Don B. ennig, P.E. Project Manager • • CITY OF TIGARD PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE: fl c II// O , 1 $ ( STAFF: VI" +9 � UM APPLICANT: l Z,4 f [Ali / )EXI C/I-A) *Q�' AGENT: P14-1 4 -d c�-A) Phone: 6 -C6s Phone: r- '7 PROPERTY LOCATION: p 6116-616d4-8 Address: ii // / / S • W t'/4 c /.' / c Tax Map &Tax Lot: IS 36/(3 50o �,il/ ,/ ,, NECESSARY APPLICATION (S) : 3 f I & $\ E--1) E LtPM T I� 1 Eu J ( toh . 1 AA) ges<?/ T. ) PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: £XPA >1I M - � rd Yl /F .l 471) cam, t , i c e)aci9& /24¢-o % . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: G %A-.L CO {'t(,n4 1 Ci ZONING DESIGNATION: -�+ C , G CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM F r fts I CHAIRPERSON: (O J 1 E IOS PHONE: /3 - /2S ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS VOX' Minimum lot size: F9- sq. ft. � 30?' Minimum lot width: SO ft. Setbacks: front 4a' ft. side ft. rear ft. garage ®' ft. corner 4 ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: g''$ % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 15 % Maximum building height: 4-S ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum mum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum mum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: S ft. from centerline of 91- Established areas: ft. from Lower intensity zones: ft., along the site's boundary BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020): Buildings located in a non - residential zone may be built to a height. of 75 feet provided: 1. A maximum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will: be at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone district. Page 1 4 PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: 4 )11-1 " 545:1 _ 1 OQ- 4P4C'SO44 ar h birt PLUS DAQ_ SgcsL /A e y No more than 25% of required spaces may be designated and /or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: - Standard parking space dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. - Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft. Disabled parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for civic, non - residential, commercial and industrial developments which provide 15 or more parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every 15 vehicular parking spaces. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage areas, must be paved. Drive -in use queuing areas: Minimum number of accesses: COVE t Minimum access width: � f ' 24-4e et 0 % '^ Maximum access width: 40 feet Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. - A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/ driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. / / \3 ° � 5 w 1�} ci i t C- t3 Page 2 • BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100. The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area: ft. along north boundary ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary /0 ft. along west boundary I. addition, sig.t obscuring sgreen'.s is required along • 5_ Le i• . ° •�1`, C i "V r , Q _ N ,�"' i / Ct • rT !. . STREET TREES Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private property within six feet of the right - of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the tree at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. ----�! SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review hpplication. Alternatively, a Sign code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. SQc k 1$• "4 bj ¶j CbwtniJvtt N - COGtQ.. SENSITIVE LANDS Code Chapter 18.84 provides -.. . ...._ for lands which are potentially . unsuitable for deve • • =.t du- to -__ �� • the 100 -year floodplain, natural drainageways, . r land - - - : , on `T- _ in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staf ; a . . i - • . prel m nnri _ sensitive lands areas . the .. • • • r y identify � � conference based on n available information. ,: :a -.e �,•�R.. ibi • to • - reel • ident • sensitive .._ lands areas, and the. • •,• • , s, - th. responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the d. initio's •f =-. =it lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with th- •- •elopment application. . Page 3 • • Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. In most cases, dedication of 100 - year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS ►N1 ET' �D WAS ? E R' RA.< G&.,on) G B- i. k) CE ltJFJG tMo-i YYl e67'4 G /3 cI e T . PROCEDURE . Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. �'k APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.H. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. ---A Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will preform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division.:;. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10 day public appeal period follows all use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the L 4 AI A) IOC - (0 rn m !J f/ A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. - Page 4 • . This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre - application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre - application conference, unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: k+ IC-1 c9"AL A 46 Rj PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 639 -4171 Page 5 • PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre - application conference is to: (1) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (2) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (3) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right -of -way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: 1) to increase abutting public rights - of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right -of -way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or 2) for the creation of new streets. N/4- Approval of a development application for this site will require right -of - way dedication for: 1• to feet from centerline. 2. to feet from centerline. 3. to feet from centerline. Street improvements: >� /A� 24.) i fe ci ps,e /211D 1. street improvements will be necessary along 2. street improvements will be necessary along 3. Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five -foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street may be . deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non, remonstrance agreement which waives the property owners right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: 1. 2. Page 6 Pedestrianwaya /bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed _ development site's "-14 Water Supply: The Tigard Water District (Phone: 639 -1554) or the Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone: 642 - 1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene C Birchill, 645 - 8533) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: Storm sewer improvements: STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on -site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility and /or the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. PsJyt TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county -wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible only when. the T7F is greater than $5,000.00. P Page 7 . • STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right -of -way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street ope:iing permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY ✓lltr ENGINEERING DIV SION PHONE: 639 -4171 RP:preapnon -- Page 8 • Staff JaqtVid- Date 3-$ CITY OF TIGARO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your - application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639 -4171. ITEMS TO 8E BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDE A) Application form (1 copy) [ Y' 8) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument [ (,' / ) � 0) Assessor's map _ [VY E) Plot or site plan 1 F) Applicant's statement [� ( t [ ]/ (H) Filing fee ($ S . ) Sc9•nczk.u . [ �l SPECIFIC MATERIALS _ A) - Site Information showing (No. of copies /C ): [ y ' 1) Vicinity Map _ [� 2) Site size & dimensions [La-v 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) [ ] 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [ ] 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: • a) Floodplain areas [ ] b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ ] c) Unstable ground [ ] d) Areas with high seasonal water table 1 1 e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ 1 f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ( ] 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive - Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats [ ] b) Wetlands [ ] 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings [ ] b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level .. [ • 8) Location of existing structures and their uses -- - [ 9) Location and type of on and off -site noise sources 10) Location of existing : utilities and easements [L • 11) Location of existing. dedicated right -of- ways -- g ( [ 8) Site Development Plan showinNo:::of copies /6 ): [`j 1) The proposed: site and surrounding properties 2) Contour line intervals [` 3) The location, dimensions names of a) Existing platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site -and on adjoining 1 ] properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 • b) Proposed streets or other public ways C. easements on the site. [ `T c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension [ ] 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [ a� b) Parking and circulation areas [ c) Loading and services areas [ d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation [ e) Outdoor common areas, [ ] f) Above ground utilities [ V 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [ b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [ 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7) Sanitary sewer facilities [� 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 1 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [ 10) The location of mailboxes [ 3 11) The location of all structures and their orientation [ '} 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ 3 C) Grading Plan (No. of copies g, ) [� The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. [� 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical • engineering report [ ] b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals [ ] c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated O) Architectural Drawings (No. of copies 6 ( J.- The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) _ Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on —site; and : (11/ 2) Typical elevation drawings of each. structure. - . ( E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies l� ): [ ] • The landscape plan shall be, drawn at the' same scale of the <. ;; . site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall- _ indicate: - 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [ ] 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings • APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 2 • • . 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces [ ] 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. [�I The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. [ ] 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [�]� F). Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ -]-'" G) Traffic generation estimate 1 ] H) Preliminary partition or lot line adjustment map showing (No. of Copies ): 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ ] 2) The owner's authorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north arrow and date [ 1 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ ] 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines [ ] 7) Location and width of all water courses 1 ] 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level [ ] 9) All slopes greater than 251. 1 ] 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ] 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right of location and width [ ] b) A scaled cross- section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [ ] 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ ] 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [ ] I) Subdivision Preliminary.Plat Map and data showinq(No. of Copies ): 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet [ ] 2) The proposed name of the subdivision [ ] 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets - [ ] 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of application 1 3 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided 1 3 _ 7) Names of adjacent: subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of land [ 3 8) Contour lines related to=a City - established bench- - mark at 2 -foot intervals for 0 -101. grades greater than 10% [ ] APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 3 9) The purpose, location, type and size o all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): [ ] a) Public and private right- of-ways and easements [ ] b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ ] c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ ] d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) [ ] e) Watercourses [ ] f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways and other land encumbrances [ ] 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ 3 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. [ ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. [ ] 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right -of -say; [ ] 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow [ 3 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways 1 ] 16) The proposed lot configurations, approx mate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots [ ] 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any [ ] 18) The existing uses the property, including the • location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting C ] 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) [ ] b) Proof of property ownership [ 1 c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements [ 3 20) Existing natural features including rock out croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. [ ] 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be - incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. C 3 J) Other Information C 3 Solae 44cc15.5 Ca cuithiGI s (2362P/0028P) APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 4 C/ T • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS lill 1. "iCO3-1NO. ( copies _ CPO NO. 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4 ullding Official/Dave 8. Parts i Recreation Board /Pillde City Recorder �Enoineer ngi /c a4a os *1. 354/ 1// Field Operations 7 eraita Facilitator/Viola C. 3. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Fire District School Dist No. 48 (Pick -up box) (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 verton, OR 97075 Tigard Pater District School Dist. 237 - 8777 SW Burnham Bt. (Tigard) Tigard, OR 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District Unified Sewerage Agency /Silts Program 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. \\\/// 155 N. First St. Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro, OR 97124 4- AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use i Transp. BounderyCksmdasion 150 N. First Ave. 320 SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97204 Brent Curtis Sevin Martin PO:TTRO - GREENSPACES PROGRAM Mike Borrason Mel Huie (CPA's /ZOA'e) Scott Sing 600 NE Grand Fred Eberle Portland, OR 97232-2736 _ DLCD (CPA's /ZO&'s) City of Beaverton 1175 Court St. !(8 Jim e� - Principal Planner Salem, OR 97310 -0590 PO Beaverton, OR 97076 Oa City of Xing City _ City of Durham - City Eger City 15300 SW 116th PO Box Manager Sing City, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 City o! Lake Oswego - City of Portland 380 City 1120 SW Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Portland, OR 97204 ,� D Division _ = COOT Pr PO Box 25412 deign 9002 SE McLoughlin Blvd. Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Milwankie, OR 97222 City of Tualatin PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 5. SPECIAL AGE!(CIES ‘AGeneral TelephOne Portland General Elec. Regimenting Office Brian Moore PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholia Fry. , OR 97281 -3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 NW Natural Gas Metro Area Communications Scott Palmer - Jason Hewitt 220 NW Second Ave. Twin Oaks TSechoology Center Portland, CO 97209 1815 NW 169th Place 8 -6020 Beaverton TCI Cablevision of Oregon • OR 97006 -4886 Mike Hallock f US West 3500 SW Bond St. - Pete Nelson Portland, OR 97201 - 421 8V Oak St. a Portland, OR 97204 1 4200 8W � o ( CM. _ Tri -Met Transit Dew. Beaverton, OR 97005 Sim In= 6. SSA A68NCffi 4012 8E 17th Ave. Portland, OR 97202 Aeronautics Div. (000T) - - _ _ DOCAMI _ Division of State Lands Commerce F Wildlife M.B. Perk- - - - . ' - - OTHER . - POC Dept. of Eaviron. Quality _- - _ 7. PBDSRAL AGSNCDSS : corp.. of Engineers ' Poet Office 8. OTBER Southern Pacili,c Transportation Company 8 Bit Forney, 6th Avenue , R. 324, Union , Portland, OR 97209 Peterson En 'neei b� g Consulting Engineers PROJECT NARRATIVE March 1, 1994 Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant 11619 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 "Proposed Expansion and Remodel" • Expand existing structure from 3,323 sq. ft. to 4,774 sq. ft. providing for the increased need of dinning area. • Remodel existing interior to create dinning and drinking areas with a southwest atmosphere. • Modify the buildings exterior to create a modern southwest look. • Revise existing site to accommodate the increase in building size. This will require the relocation of the existing entry onto the property from S.W. Pacific Highway, removal of the existing parking area south of the building, and a general update of the site to meet current city requirements. 2644 NE 26th 2g Portland, OR 97212 Phone (503) 287 -5532 Fax (503) 282 -7226 e 1 . C. Peterson Engineerg Consulting Engineers PROJECT NARRATIVE March 1, 1994 Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant 11619 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 "Proposed Expansion and Remodel" • Expand existing structure from 3,323 sq. ft. to 4,774 sq. ft. providing for the increased need of dinning area. • Remodel existing interior to create dinning and drinking areas with a southwest atmosphere. • Modify the buildings exterior to create a modern southwest look. • Revise existing site to accommodate the increase in building size. This will require the relocation of the existing entry onto the property from S.W. Pacific Highway, removal of the existing parking area south of the building, and a general update of the site to meet current city requirements. /s/ 36 b3 - 5 00 2644 NE 26th Portland, OR 97212 Phone (503) 287 -5532 Fax (503) 282 -7226 Peterson Engineeig Consulting Engineers PROJECT NARRATIVE March 1, 1994 Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant 11619 S.W. Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 "Proposed Expansion and Remodel" • Expand existing structure from 3,323 sq. ft. to 4,774 sq. ft. providing for the increased need of dinning area. • Remodel existing interior to create dinning and drinking areas with a southwest atmosphere. • Modify the buildings exterior to create a modern southwest look. • Revise existing site to accommodate the increase in building size. This will require the relocation of the existing entry onto the property from S.W. Pacific Highway, removal of the existing parking area south of the building, and a general update of the site to meet current city requirements. 2644 N.E. 26th Portland, OR 97212 Phone (503) 287 -5532 Fax (503) 282 -7226 • EXHIBIT - A - APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission . . $235.00 costs Planning Commission /Hearings Off. to Council . $315.00 + transcript BLASTING PERMITS $125.00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING Text only, Map only, or both $675.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING Conditional Use Review $365.00 FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS $ 80.00 HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT $ 80.00 HOME OCCUPATION Gr4gInal-Re*mit $ 50.00 - rYPeI Renewal $ 10. OG lyear -Nit . r_ INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE . . . $ 55.00 by Community Development Department LAND PARTITION Residential and Non- residential $235.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $50.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Conceptual and detailed plan review $500.00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood plain $520.00 , Wetlands /Steep slopes /Drainageway $235.00 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS $230.00 SIGN PERMIT 0 -24 sq. ft. $ 10.00 . 24 -100 sq. ft. $ 25.00 • 100 + sq. ft $ 35.00 Temporary signs $ 10.00 each sign SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under $10,000 $ 80.00 $ 10,000 - $ 99,999 $155.00 $ 100,000 - $499,999 $315.00 .. $ 500,000 - $999,999 $415.00 $1,000,000 or more $520.00 + $1 per $10,000 over $1 million not to exceed $2000. SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT $415.00 + $5 /lot Subdivision Variance, if needed. $105.00 TEMPORARY USE Director' Decision $ 50.00 Special exemption /Non- Profit . . -. . . .. . . $ -0- TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - $ -0- VACATIONS Streets and public access $300.00 deposit - actual costs charged VARIANCE Administrative $80.00 Sign Code $230.00 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS Less than 10 acres $520.00 10 acres or more $625.00 ZONE CHANGE PROCESSING Less than 10 acres $520.00 10 acres or more $625.00 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT $310.00 JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE 100% of highest planning fee plus 10% of all additional planning fees related to the proposal. br /Resl.ksl ilfrvi:46:12 1,9 et 6e-riv6 WO /9/ • • • 17 % MUSSNLI CO, STMOigTligal NiugiAl HNC. 7/25/94 APPLICANT STATEMENT Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant 11619 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, Or 97223 "Proposed Expansion and Remodel" 1. Expand existing structure from 3,354 SF to 4,819 SF (1,465 SF addition) due to increased need of dining area. 2. Remodel existing interior and exterior to create a modern southwest look. 3. Revise existing site to accommodate the increase in building size and a general upgrade of the site to meet current City of Tigard requirements. Site work includes upgraded landscaping including new parking islands with canopy trees, conversion of existing parking area south of building to landscape area, and 14' offset of existing entry onto the property from SW Pacific Highway "jug handle" turn. 503 - 228 -3413 FAX # 228 -2770 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE, SUITE 202. PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 • • • • Name of applicant RUSE _L- Cskt Situ CTIA^t 1 j C . Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # 1 S 1 3 C) 63 T L, 0© so (0 Address or General Location 11 (p 19 S W P!arc i Ft C t 4 y r y i 1 C1A-Q-4 0 2' 1-27 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE 1, �k..1 �� , do affirm that I rf (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed R ( eC i affecting the land located at t [ (o t 9 S w PA-c- c etc_ ►C ka O , and did on the f 2 - day of , 19 `( 4 - personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a S rrE t7 C v ( =C..oP M E� C' E v 1I 1-1 application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 1140 V Uv PA-et Plc LA w y E x t s i , (state location on property) This I Z day of (-) vc-1 , 19 /)Pq Signature Subscnbed and swom to, affirmed, before me this 1 2'=4 day of , 19 rZ' y Notary u for the State o c regon My Commission Expires: y/ /9 •z. OFFICIAL SEAL ' --' ?Y NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON ' "'/ COMMISSION NO. 014813 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR. 21. 1996 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 loginlio'posuwtat • )c 'J Ftr2r. /it 2h Q-- MEET /NG NOTICE Russell Construction Inc., agent for property owner, is proposing expansion and improvements to the Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, the applicants would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: WEDNESDAY JULY 27, 1994 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAIUNG STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) bolt ttk N M`Ca . being duly sworn, depose and say that on Tu(fS ( />%' i JLI.Y 1 2, . 19 c i 4- , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at e{ ((O 19 S W Critic -t Ft c (4vr-t, Tic-14a 0 Odd . a copy of whichi so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at }I S W I-tvY i o 0 ft . with postage prepaid thereon. 7) Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this / 2 day of J t.! LI , 19 9 . Notary • 77 My Commission Expires: 4 1 l en. _ OFF CLAL SEAL _._ !:R h'�. s R. ?:oE[�r ij..iON S ;`` j NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ..,OMMiK1ON NO 014813 k7Y co R MISSION ExPiRES APR. 21, ly36 h: \login\jo \affmail.cit III • 7/11/94 CIT (East) (Citizens Involvement Team) Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard, OR 97223 .Fieldl/ ADDRESSES .ANOTHERNAME/ PER LIST .Field6/ ATTACHED .Field2/ .Field3 /, . Field4/ .Fields/ Russell Construction Inc. (RCI) is representing the owner of the property located at 11619 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, OR 97223, Tax Lot 500 Map 1S136DB. We are considering proposing expansion and upgrade of the restaurant (Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant) at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, I would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Wednesday July 27, 1994 Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 7:00 PM Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to submittal of the application to the City. I look forward to specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call me at 228 -3413 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Don B. Hennig Project Manager • . • • 1 t / t)a4 if i rim MAI. MOc. 14T; , € xnw P w� II CI- 4- MA t_c../ & BAMBUSCH, GARY DEAN CHAMPION, RONALD V. AND CHAMPION, ROBERTA E. 11000 SW 74TH 11642 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 BAMBUSCH, GARY DEAN CHAMPION, RONALD V. AND CHAMPION, ROBERTA E. 11000 SW 74TH 11642 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 CORBIN, GROVER D TRUSTEE Craig Hopkins 4680 SW DOGWOOD DR. 7430 SW Varns LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97035 Tigard, OR 97223 DUANE COMPANY GENSMAN, LEE R. AND ALICE L. ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT C/0 GENSMAN, MITCHELL E. & DEBORAH PO BOX 42121 963 WESTWOOD PORTLAND, OR 97242 PORTLAND, OR 97201 GENSMAN, MITCHESS EDWARD HALL DONALD W & GRACE L AND HALL, JOHN G. & PARKER, CAROL J. C/O AMAN, WALTER S & AMAN, WALTER 963 SW WESTWOOD DR. PO BOX 19089 PORTLAND, OR 97201 PORTLAND, OR 97216 HALL DONALD W AND GRACE L Joel Stevens HALL, JOH G ET AL 1300 SW 5TH AVE #3009 9660 SW Ventura Court PORTLAND, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97223 • • Mark F. Mahon Mary Swintek 11310 SW 91st Court 9915 SW Frewing *23 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard , OR 97223 MORRIS, JOHN C PIERCE, GILBERT E. MORRIS, DAISY E. BY SUBWAY TIGARD INC 11621 SW PACIFIC HWY 4840 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97225 PIERCE, GRACE AND SIMONSON, KATHRYN A KESSLER, JULES E. TACO BELL #1091 F 179 VON KARMAN 11005 SW 74TH IRVINE, CA 92714 TIGARD, OR 97223 STEWART, PHYLLIS AND Stewart, Phyllis T and STEWART, DONATA AND COHEN, NATHAN Stewart Trust 621 ENGLEWOOD DR. 621 SW Englewood Dr. LAKE OSWEGO, OR 97034 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 THORPE, RICKARD L. LAURIE TYSON, ALFRED J. LARSON, RAYMOND K. 5606 SW CALIFORNIA 28275 NW DORLAND RD. PORTLAND, OR 97219 HILLSBORO , OR 97124 UNION GOSPEL MINISTRIES OF PTLD IN WATTS, KENNETH GILBRT C/O FRANCESCHI, JEROME & GENEVIEE FRANSCESCHI, KENNETH & BARBARA TRS 37 SAN MATEO CT PO BOX 230925 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903 TIGARD, OR 97281 • • ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF ALPROP CO. THE NORTHWEST INC. 6149 SW SHATTUCK RD 3601 6TH AVE S. PORTLAND, OR 97221 SEATTLE, WA 98134 TON MOYER THEATERS MILNE REAL PROPERTIES, INC 703 BROADWAY SUITE 605 PO BOX 2740 VANCOUVER, WA 98660 PORTLAND, OR 97200 111 III r - SIGN UP SHEET FOR 7/27/94 7:00 PM PUBLIC MEETING AT TIGARD CITY HALL REGARDING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION FOR: MAZATLAN MEXICAN RESTAURANT 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD, OR 97223 /X - OCIAA-Va (l: 7 H11 • 1 - I I} 1 ( C9-*-e-f2-'---t7 503 - 228 -3413 FAX # 228 -2770 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE, SUITE 202 e PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 • • mg" �d ao RECEIVED JUL 1 2 1994 7/8/94 To whom it may concern; By signatures below, Galvan and Guitron Partnership, Owners of Record of Tax Lot 00500 Map 1S136DB, 11619 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, Or 97223, affirm that Russell Construction Inc. 2211 N.W. Front Ave., Portland, Or. 97209 is authorized to act as agent of the partnership to prepare and submit Site Development Review application for subject parcel to City of Tigard. ), E . :4 2 / Signature Date 7 - - 9'y Fg.eA) y407-Zea,) ) Print Name Signature Date 9--y 7y Print Name 0 l Signature Date Print Name 1•1(p. Signature Date Print Name For Galvin and Guitron Partnership. Prepared by Norman Russell, President. k Russell Construction Inc. Date 503 - 228 -3413 FAX # 228 -2770 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE, SUITE 202 o PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 I. r ,. DIED fIndIvI Corporate). COPYRIGHT 1999 •ENS-NESS LAW PUBLISHING CO., PORTLAND. OR 97204 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED : Commerical Investments Co. ,$.NOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That , hereinafter called grantor, .../ 7 for the consideration hereinafter stated, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Galvan and Guitron Partnership f/ D hereinafter called grantee, and unto grantee's heirs, successors and assigns all of that certain real property with the tenements,', hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, situated in the County Washington of , State of Oregon, described as follows, to -wit: Beginning at the stone with a cross at the Northeast corner of the George Richardson I Donation l,a;ld Claim No. 55 in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian in the County of Washington and State of Oregon; thence North 89° 00' West 816.7 feet along the North line of said Donation Land Claim to a 1/4 inch x 3 inch strap iron; thence South 00° 29' West 450.5 feet, more or less, to a 1 inch 1 iron pipe in a fence line; thence South 89° 00' East 160.0 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pipe at the true point of beginning of the tract herein described; thence South 00° I 29' West 593.54 feet to an iron pipe in the North right of way line of the West Side Pacific Highway; thence North 54° 02" East 238.70 feet along said right of way line to a 1/2 inch iron pipe; thence North 00° 29' East 450.0 feet to a 3/4 inch x 1 inch , iron bar; thence North 89 00' West 192.0 feet to the true point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission by deed recorded October 21, 1953 in Book 349, Page 436, Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon. AND FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM beginning at the stone with a cross at the Northeast corner of the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55 in Section 36, Township 1 (See Attached Exhibit a) )IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) To Have and to Hold the same unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever. And the grantor hereby covenants to and with the said grantee and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns I that said real property is free from encumbrances created or suffered thereon by grantor and that grantor will war- ! II rant and defend the same and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons claiming b through, or under the .I g Y, g grantor. * ii The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, stated in terms of dollars, is $ • II ®However, the actual consideration consists of or includes other property or value given or promised which is 1 the whole xxp <Consideration (indicate which).® (The sentence between the symbols 0I , if not applicable, should be deleted. See ORS 93.030.) 11 In construing this deed and where the context so requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical I it changes shall be implied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to corporations and to individuals. In Witness Whereof, the grantor has executed this instrument on February , 19 94 ; if a I corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed and its seal affixed by an officer or other person duly author- ' ized to do so by its board of directors. *deed is given in fulfillment of Land Sale Contract recorded at Fee #90 -69519 THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DE- USE LAWS THIS INSTRUMENT EGUL T ION IN BEFORE NI G APPLICABLE LAND a f=t sP. -e -e.. !t,Sa � %`"�'-a+✓ � USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING 4." ' I I THIS INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE , PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR II COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. A .� -,�- -' )) (�r / i I II lif executed by a corporation, affix corporate seal and /_ .#�. 2,� � f ✓ l /1 /' / / Y' I I • use the form of acknowledgment opposite.) 1 STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON, ) ) ss. ) ss. County of ) County of Multnomah ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on This instrument was acknowledged before me on , ,19 , by 19 , by Larry B. Kerr as Managing Partner of Commercial Investment Co. r A . Notary Public for Oregon Notary Public for Oregon i' OFFICIAL S (SEAL) : a.. R • 91 . x PIOI�PdiF L ' A L) My commission expires: My commission expires: 4 - Ly�� :- NOTAR @LtELIC- OFE GON Commercial Investment Co. MY COMMIgg N EY,P;i;E JUNE J 6, 1995 - 580 S.W. " View Crest Drive STAT OF OREC= Gresham, OR 97080 ss. 1 • ' County of GRANTOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS I certify that the within instru- G alvan and Guitron Partnership '` ment was received for record on the ■,, - 11619 B.W. Pacific Highway < i ;; ` Tigard, OR 97.2-2-3 day of , 19 , at o'clock M., and recorded GRANTEE'S NAME AND ADDRESS SPACE RESERVED in book /reel /volume No on Alter recording return to: F OR e ' a page or as fee /file /instru- Galvan and Guitron Partnership RECORDER'S USE ' • 11619 S.W. Pacific Highway ment /microfilm /reception No , rd.I . . Tigard, OR 97223 Record of Deeds of said county. Y f Witness my hand and seal of ', NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP rjA, County affixed. i 4'., U ntil a change Is requested alt fax statements shall be sent to the following address. 4X gaiyan.• and ..Guitzo,n (- Partnership ' „ 1:161.; C ��T T� �l : : $.1 • F acif 1 y NA ME , ( 3 . ' c- - High wa .. T..' ;7 'Z. 'Z. TITL 4 ,y NAME. ADDRESS. ZIP By Deputy 111 ; !' , . f�t ;A: 1 : — —_ ___ _ —._ �'4 h }" * EXHIBIT A South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon; thence North 89° 00' West 816.7 feet along the North line of said Donation Land Claim to an iron; thence South 00° 29' West 450.5 feet, more or less, to an iron pipe in a fence line; thence South 89° 00' East 160.0 feet to an iron pipe at the true point of beginning of the tract herein described; said true point of beginning being also the Northwest corner of that certain tract of land described indeed to E.S. Goodell, et al, recorded in Book 347, Page 667, Deed Records, Washington County, Oregon; thence from said true point of beginning South 00° 29' West 100.0 feet to a point; thence South 89° 00' East parallel to the North line of the said Goodell tract 192.0 feet, more or less, to a point on the East line thereof; thence North 00° 29' East 100.0 feet to the Northeast corner of said Goodell tract; thence North 89° 00' West 192.0 feet to the true point of beginning. AND FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM beginning at the Southwest corner of that tract of land conveyed to Earle L. Miller by deed recorded in Book 458, Page 516, Washington County, Oregon, Deed Records; thence South along the West line of said Peterson tract 150 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said Miller Tract 120 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of said Peterson tract to the North line of the West Side Pacific Highway; thence Northeasterly along said North line 70 feet, more or less, to the East line of said Peterson tract; thence North along said East line 350 feet, more or less, to the Southeast corner .of said Miller tract; thence West along the South line of said Miller tract 192 feet tot he point of beginning. • • • Staff 0/ 4 1 110- 3 / 9 ct CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your - application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639 -4171. ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) [ ' 8) Owner's signature/written authorization [ J C) Title transfer instrument - [ ( r3Y CITY Ply M A - 2k) C .. E) Plot or site lan 5 F) Applican s statement [tam (H) Filing fee ($ SQsL. fats-) Sc9A 1 Q- SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Information showing (No. of copies / ): [ t 1) Vicinity Map _ 2) Site size & dimensions [(Y 3) Contour lines (2 ft at O-10% or 5 ft for grades 10%) [ ] 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 1 ] 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas [ ] b) Slopes in excess of 25T 1 ] c) Unstable ground - 1 1 d) Areas with high seasonal water table [ ] e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential 1 3 f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils [ ] 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats 1 3 b) Wetlands [ ] 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings . 1 ] b) Trees with 6` + caliper measured -4 feet from ground level 8) Location of existing structures and their uses [ _ 9) Location and type of on and off -site noise sources C 10) Location of existing utilities and easements ,, - 11) Location of existing dedicated right -of -ways Site Development Plan showing` (No. of copies l6 ): 1) The proposed: site and surrounding properties 2) Contour line intervals - ; [ 3) The location, dimensions and names of all: - a) Existing . & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining [ ] properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 cr ;� • • b) Proposed streets or other public ways 6 easements on the site. [ c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension [ ] 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [�]� b) Parking and circulation areas [ c) Loading and services areas [ d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation [ e) Outdoor common areas, [ ) f) Above ground utilities [ 5) The location, dimensions b setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [ `� b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [ 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions [ '/ 7) Sanitary sewer facilities [`T 8) The location of areas to be landscaped 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 10) The location of mailboxes C - 11) The location of all structures and their orientation 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ ] C) Grading Plan (No. of copies p.,) (-3-' The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. - 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: - a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report [ ] b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals [ ] c) That all problems will be mitigated and =- how they will be mitigated [ gk // 0) Architectural Drawings (No. of copies _ ):. - The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) - Floor plans indicating the square footage -of all structures proposed for use on -site; and 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. Ur: : - Y E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies l ): [ ] The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [ ] 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 2 • • 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces [ ] 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and - proposed plant materials. [L] The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. C 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. Lu.� IL St ue Cf .cf ;`-- c-q- - - F)- Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ y� G) Traffic generation estimate [ 3 H) Preliminary partition or lot line adjustment map showing (No. of Copies ): 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ ] 2) The owner's authorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north arrow and date [ ] 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ 3 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines [ 3 7) Location and width of all water courses [ 3 8) Location of any trees with 6° or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level _ [ 3 9) All slopes greater than 25% [ 3 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ] 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right-of-way location and width [ 3 b) A scaled cross - section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [ ] 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ 3 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [ ] I) Subdivision Preliminary Plat Map and data showinq(No. of Copies ) 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch ' and limited to one phase per sheet [ ] - 2) The proposed name of the subdivision [ 3 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of application _. [ ] 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided - [ ] 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or naves of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land [ ] 8) Contour lines related to -a City - established bench- mark at 2 -foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than lox [ APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 3 /1 • 9) The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): - [ ] a) Public and private right -of -ways and easements [ ] b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines [ ] c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants [ 3 d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) [ 3 e) Watercourses [ 3 f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways - and other land encumbrances [ 3 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ ] 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. [ ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. [ 3 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way; [ ] 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow - [ 3 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways - [ 3 16) The proposed lot configurations, approx mate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where losts are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots 1 ] 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any [ ] 18) The existing uses the property, including the - location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting [ 3 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) [ 3 b) Proof of property ownership [ ] c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements [ 3 20) Existing natural features including rock out- croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. [ ] 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be - incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. [ ] J) Other Information [ 3 (2.362P/0028P) APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 4 • • _ - Cr T aarill LIST P02 ALL APPLICATIaws 1. 1®11D. (2) oopiw — CYO 110. 2. LIST DEPART a CBnlldiag Offleial/Dave S. — Parks t Recreation Board Police Cit l r Pia1d Operations V,.�4lneering/ rte-9r *2 • w Facilitator/Viola C. 3 . SPECIAL DISIItICTd __ Fire District — School Dist Bo. 48_ (Pick-up box) (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 verton, OR 97075 Tigard Pater District School Dist. 233 8777 Sill Burnham St. (Tigard) Tigard, 02 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. - Tigard, OR 97223 Ti1atiD 1�'R Water District L Unified Sewerage Agency /Ss84 Program. 650 SY S aylars i rsy Bd. T 155 N. First St.. Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro, OR 971.24 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Mash. Co. Land use t Sransp. — Boundary Commission 150 II. First Ave. 320 SW Start Roos 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Port-1=d, OR 97204 Brent Curtis -- Kevin Martin — METRO - CR ERSPACPS PitoCRA!! Soo Xing 600 99 Crand ((CPA's/TO/Vs) . n — Fred merle Portland, OR 97232 -2736 — City of Beaverton DLCD (CPA's /NOV's) 1175 Court St. 92 Zia 7 r x - Principal Planner Safer, OR 97310-0590 PO Box Beaverton, OR 97076 Other ci city — City of Durban 15300 SW 116th Pty r King City, OR 97224 Tigard, Box 23483-3483 OR 97224 - City of Lake City° — City of Portland Manager 380 Sit A Planning 5th . Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Portland, OR 97204 /� Division OD - Lidvien Bahama PO Box 25412 9002 HE McLoughlin Blvd. Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Milvaakie, OR 97222 __ City of Tualatin PO Box 369 - 'Tualatin, OR 97062 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone ParL Cod Coastal Elec. �� gOffice Arian Moors Box OR 97281-3416 14635 SW Old Scholia lay. Beaverton, OR 97007 fit arl4 Natzwal Cam Motto Area CannonicatIons 800tt Palmer Jason fka itt 220 29 Samoa Ave. Ott - n , OR 97209 1815 1Oaks 9th WI of Oregon Somvei0ao. CR 97006 -{886 Nike Ballot* IIS West 3500 SW Bond St. — Pete Belson Portland. OR 97201 421 Sit Oak St. a Portlasatt Columbia Cable (Prank Shari) - • OR 97204 14200 Bit arigm.dooa Ct. Sri -pat linmsit Dew. asevarton, OR 97005 Kim Boat 6. Sea ACQSC�S - 4012 Si 17th Ave. Portland, OR 97202 Astronautics aautics Div. (OT) - DOGtQ Division of State ads Y L Commerce Dept. - 11.8. Park Piste & Wildlife P0C Dept. of Mhtviron. Quality 7. lfitafftAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Post Offices 8 . OTC Southern Pacific Transorpostatlext Company Doane K. Forney, 800 29 6th Avenue, 9. 324, Union Station , Portland, OR 97209 05/19/94 14:37 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIG_ARD 0001:003 • • r Post -It' Fax Note 7671 re s -- d1 . ' 3 j , To Y d . 1/1 From S'v'Z f � � 2ou - An L 3 i - 4(1-1 COJ Phone s -- 2. - 2 - ..... ... 5 Li/ Phone >i ` ' II 3 -., lax s C Fax * Z2 .,� � _ 'ZZ-- 'x"77 • 1 1/4 1.-1(..)2 . -Z LW v ri r ..•°oe • I • .1 ; SEE MAR . .1 i / - I ., . 15136C Ai ` I Y .....10 I .. ._ - IZ. c • me s wo ].YOO To r.. - : 7 667 j 900 ° .. 50011 20 _ ' ...15 it. d • r °.. 20014-1 ' 1 , .\ r, , _ CS 103er Soo ✓ ° I f e-- w ••� 70 0� �'ti `�� I . • • G Lei . 70011 ' _ .. -�� Q 4 .e 1. r!` •v i 5 �. L$ I • ./ 4 s 1 9 r y 2600 ••••••• z•••e°'c s. I � t .• '' s S.OTAC i• 600 ° i • °•r i ?3ie y o ✓ v � s / '� e - , ' ✓ = 260 "AC \ ' � • .S y ^ � �` X Ac v V N � is roar p.. 0.40 2 r r 23.81 1 . 4 �ts0o a ..., 8 F r • ' ° ` .. II ' a. $ t : 12400 ✓ w r e _ : / /4AC if 1 _ ......r N z • :C o 0 / .r i �• v • W 40 yt 1 ,� !c w•. n V 97 = I's i n.oc 2501 X '/' w :_;• 69re 1- 1- e. w ` • 1 .r .... 1 ' : - .s, Col - / :� SEE MA P •••• 0 i • IS. 7SCC • 1.64 C 1 1S136DB -00200 1S136DB -00201 FRANCESCHI, KENNETH & JEROME DUANE COMPANY 37 SAN MATEO CT ATTN: TAX DEPT SAN RAFAEL CA 94903 PO BOX 42121 PORTLAND OR 97242 1S136D8-00500 1S136DB -00501 COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS UNION GOSPEL MINISTRIES OF PTLD % GALVAN & GUITRON PARTNERSHIP % FRANCESCHI, JEROME & GENEVIEVE TR 11619 SW PACIFIC HWY FRANCESCHI, KENNETH & BARBARA TRS TIGARD OR 97223 37 SAN MATEO CT SAN RAFAEL CA 94903 1S136DB -00600 15136DB -00700 TYSON, ALFRED J ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF THE LARSON, RAYMOND K NORTHWEST, INC 28275 NW DORLAND RD 3601 6TH AVE S HILLSBORO OR 97124 SEATTLE WA 98134 15136D3-00800 15136DB -00900 MORRIS, JOHN C DAISY E GENSMAN, MITCHELL EDWARD 11621 SW PACIFIC HWY 963 SW WESTWOOD DR TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 1S136DB -01000 1S136DB -02200 GENSMAN, LEE R & ALICE L BAMBUSCH, GARY DEAN % GENSMAN, MITCHELL E & DEBORAH 11000 SW 74TH 963 WESTWOOD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 15136DB -02300 1S136DB -02400 THORPE, RICHARD L LAURIE CHAMPION, RONALD V AND 5606 SW CALIFORNIA ROBERTA E PORTLAND OR 97219 11642 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD OR 97223 1S136DB -02500 15136DB -02502 PIERCE, GILBERT /GRACE ET AL PIERCE, GILBERT E TACO BELL #1091 F BY SUBWAY TIGARD INC BY GEORGE HAMMERSMITH 4840 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD 5989 SE JENNE LANE PORTLAND OR 97225 PORTLAND OR 97236 15136DB -02600 1S136DB -02601 STEWART, PHYLLIS T AND ALPROP CO STEWART TRUST 6149 SW SHATTUCK RD 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR PORTLAND OR 97221 LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 15136DB -02602 1S136CA -01700 STEWART, PHYLLIS AND WATTS, KENNETH GILEBRT STEWART, DONATA AND PO BOX 230925 COHEN, NATHAN TRUSTEES TIGARD OR 97281 621 SW ENGLEWOOD DR LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 1S136CA -01800 MILNE REAL PROPERTIES, INC P 0 BOX 2740 PORTLAND OR 97208 t • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: Rr f , DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL IC =TI0NE • �° s4 00 14 1. CI- (2) copies _ C ?O NO. . Lslec� cs3S' 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS • 5uildinc Official /Dave S. - 5 10 Re: eatien Board . .,- ) AL lice r - ,C Recorder .-. n Field Operations • Rngineering /Michael A. P' p • Permits Facilitator /Jerree G. S !� Long -.a _e Planning /Carol S/ ,J* 7 4 3. SPECIAL __,. ///�� Fire rDistrict (pick-up box) Tigard Water Department - 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District - 5 7 1 7 Unified Sewerage Agency /SWM Program 75 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. - 155 N. First St. Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro, OR 97124 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. _ Boundary Commission 150 N. First Ave. 800 NE Oregon St. #16 Suite 540 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232 -2109 Brent Curtis _ - Kevin Martin - METRO - GREENSPACES PROGRAM Mike Borreson Mel Buie (CPA's /ZOA's) _ Scott King 600 NE Grand Fred Eberle Portland, OR 97232 -2736 - DLCD (CPA's /ZOA's) City of Beaverton 1175 Court St. NE _ Jim Hendryx - Principal Planner Salem, OR 97310 -0590 PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 Other - City of King City _ City of =_rha. _ City Manager City Mana_ar 15300 SW 116th PO Box 23433 -3483 King City, OR 97224 Tigard, CR 97224 _ City of Lake Oswego - City of =:,_tland City Manager Planning Director 380 SW A 1120 SW 5th Lake Oswego, OR 97034 /J rtland, OR 97204 _ State Highway Division V ODOT Bob Doran InQ,vct C / � PO Box 25412 9002 SE McLoughlin Blvd. Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Milwaukie. OR 97222 City of - _alatin PO Box 3:r Tualatin, OR 97062 5. SPE AGENCIES General Telephone Portland General Elec. Engineering Office s Brian Moore PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholis Fry. Tigard, OR 97281 -3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 _ NW Natural Gas Metro Area Communications Scott Palmer Jason Hewitt 220 NW Second Ave. Twin Oaks Technolcgy Center Portland, OR 97209 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 _ TCI Cablevision of Oregon Linda Peterson _ CTS West 3500 SW Bond St. Pete Nelson Portland, OR 97201 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 _ Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) (� 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct. _ t..-Met Transit Lev. S /- Beaverton, OR 97005 K Knox 710 NE Holladay S 6. STATE AGENCIES Portland, OR 97232 _ Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI - _ Division of State Lands _ Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park OTHER - Fish & Wildlife PUC Dept. of Environ. Quality 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES _ Corps. of Engineers Post Office 8. OTHER _ Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 • • SD, (14--O0ig . :15, 614 CITY OF TIGARD February 21, 1996 OREGON Centerline Concepts Attention: Don Devlaeminck . Fax: 650 -0189 Page 1 of 11 Dear Mr. Devlaeminck: This letter is in response to your request for zoning information concerning the property located at 11619 SW Pacific Highway. The property is zoned General Commercial. The residential property to the west of the restaurant at 11621 SW Pacific Highway is zoned R -12. Both properties were annexed to the City in 1987. The City has no record of any land use permits having been applied for from 1987 to 1994. In 1994 the property owner made application for, and received, a Major Modification review of the approved Site Development Review to remodel the restaurant. At that time issues related to the existing site improvements including, the non- conforming status of the land use buffer between the restaurant and the existing homes to the west were reviewed. Because the property owner did not propose to further increase the non - conformity of the existing site improvements relative to the current land use buffering requirements, no variance was necessary to expand the restaurant. The property owner was required to fill in missing gaps of the existing arborvitae hedge which screens the site from the adjoining residential areas and to add slats in the existing chain link fence. Attached is a copy of the Major Modification decision issued for this expansion. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, ki 71_ , , / i t s jz 191 Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP i s \login \cu rp I n \m a rk_r\ce n to r. d o c c: Correspondence File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 1/ 02/21/96 13:11 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 0 001 • . ********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ** ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT TX * ** ********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** • ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *0877 TX G3 503 620 2086 NICOLI ENG.,Inc. 02/21 08:05 02'06 4 OK *0878 TX G3 206 9527465 02/21 08:08 01'35 2 OK *0880 TX G3 360 571 0184 02/21 08:14 05'56 10 OK *0885 TX 6902595 02/21 09:21 00'00 0 NG 0 STOP *0887 TX G3 6902595 02/21 09:25 01'28 2 OK *0891 TX G3 02/21 09:43 00'48 1 OK *0896 TX G3 503 620 0947 02/21 10:23 00'51 1 OK *0899 TX G3 1 503 639 1471 02/21 10:32 00'45 1 OK *0900 TX G3 1 503 397 3226 02/21 10:39 01'19 2 OK *0903 TX G3 02/21 11:20 00'48 1 OK *0904 TX G3 +503 245 1105 02/21 11:23 00'48 1 OK *0905 TX G3 02/21 11:24 00'53 1 OK *0906 TX 2063433038 02/21 11:26 00'00 0 NG 0 STOP *0908 TX G3 2063433038 02/21 11:29 00'52 1 NG 1 # #281 *0908 TX G3 2063433038 02/21 11:32 00'53 1 NG 1 # #281 *0909 TX G3 2063433038- 02/21 11:34 00'46 1 NG 1 # #104 *0908 TX G3 2063433038 02/21 11:36 00'46 1 NG 1 # #104 *0912 TX 13603433038 02/21 11:37 00'00 0 NG 0 STOP *0914 TX G3 2063433038 02/21 11:39 00'52 1 NG 1 # #281 0914 TX G3 2063433038 02/21 11:42 00'46 1 NG 1 # #104 0920 TX G3 2063433038 02/21 12:26 00'46 1 NG 1 # #104 0924 TX G3 503 6500189 02/21 12:52 07'48 11 OK 0923 TX 12067281179 02/21 13:10 00'00 0 NG 0 #018 ********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ** ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT REPORT RX * ** ********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ACTY# MODE CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE T. PAGES RESULT *0870 AUTO RX G3 503 639 6302 02/20 17:11 01'18 1 OK *0871 AUTO RX G3 503 639 6302 02/20 20:09 01'18 1 OK *0872 AUTO RX G3 02/20 20:28 03'38 4 OK *0873 AUTO RX G3 503 797 1793 02/20 21:25 02'14 3 OK *0874 AUTO RX G3 503 797 1793 02/20 21:30 02'16 3 OK *0875 AUTO RX G3 503 626 8039 Robert Becker In 02/21 04:00 00'42 1 OK *0882 AUTO RX G3 503 684 0954 CARLSON TESTING 02/21 08:54 01'37 3 OK *0883 AUTO RX G3 503 288 1539 ALLIED SECURITY 02/21 08:58 01'17 2 OK *0884 AUTO RX G3 5032211171 02/21 09:02 03'46 10 OK *0890 AUTO RX G3 541 737 3453 OSU LIBRARY 02/21 09:27 00'59 2 OK *0894 AUTO RX G3 503 243 2944 02/21 09:57 02'02 3 OK *0895 AUTO RX G3 968 2676 02/21 10:15 00'51 1 OK {rvoi {1c�c�= • J CITY OF TIGARD • NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION /MAZATLAN RESTAURANT APPLICATION: The applicant requests approval of a major modification to the approved Site Development Review to allow construction of a 1,445 square foot building addition to an existing 3,223 square foot restaurant. The applicant proposes to revise the interior floor plan and exterior architectural elevations to use an Early California Mission architectural theme for the restaurant. Zone: C -G (General Commercial). Location: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). The site is located along the north side of SW Pacific Highway, northeast of the intersection of the Tigard Cinemas. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE ,SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right -of -way of SW Pacific Highway (99W). A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of the building permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall remove and replace the existing driveway approach and public sidewalk as shown on the site plan. The sidewalk shall be eight feet wide as measured from the face of curb. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream storm drain system will not be unduly affected by the on -site storm drainage run -off. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 4. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the northern side of Pacific Highway or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 5. Revised site /landscape plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: - a. Provide one additional street tree within the planter strip area along the eastern property line. b. The buffer area along the western property line shall be modified to provide the following: A continuation of the buffering arborvitae { planting along the western property shall be provided to screen the restaurant from the existing residence to further screen and buffer the site from adjoining residential uses. c. A total of 52 parking spaces are proposed. The site and landscape plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of 54 parking spaces. d. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed improvements on ( the site plan comply with the clear vision requirements. \J NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 1 • • e. Additional review shall be provided for appropriate points of pedestrian access to adjoining properties. An additional walkway shall be provided from the subject property to tax lot 501. f. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, waste assessment, comprehensive recycling plan or franchised hauler review and sign- off. g. The landscape plan shall be revised to show landscaping along the western property line towards SW Pacific Highway. h. The site plan shall be revised to locate bicycle racks so as to not conflict with pedestrian walkways. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY 7. All site improvements shall be installed and maintained pursuant to the revised site and landscape plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Assistant Planner. 8. Plans shall be submitted to the Tualatin Valley Fire District for review and approval of hydrant locations. STAFF CONTACT: Gene Birchill, Plans Examiner (526- 2502) . THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT (2; 1. Background: The site is presently developed with the Mazatlan Restaurant. The city has no previous records of development applications for this property. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is located on the north side of SW Pacific Highway northeast of the intersection of the Tigard Cinema. The property is zoned C -G (General Commercial). Properties to the east, west and north are zoned C -G. Adjoining properties are developed with a mixture of commercial and residential uses. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site has street frontage exclusively on SW Pacific Highway. The site is developed with an existing restaurant. Adjoining properties to the east, west, north and south are developed with commercial uses. The addition and remodel of the restaurant is expected to generate 20 or more additional vehicle trips to the site daily which requires a major modification review to the previously approved site development plan for the site. 4. Other Staff Comments: The Engineering Division has provided the following comments concerning this proposal: Findings: NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 2 • • 1. STREETS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared by Keech Associates, Inc. Consulting Traffic Engineers, dated September 12, 1994. The report analyzes the effects of the additional traffic that will be generated by the proposed site improvements at the existing driveway and the impact to the traffic on SW Pacific Highway, a state highway. The report concludes that the additional traffic will not significantly affect the traffic utilizing SW Pacific Highway, nor the existing driveway located with -in the jug handle at the traffic signal intersection. The report further indicates that the traffic exiting the Tigard Cinema will continue to need the existing traffic signal. No improvements are recommended. The applicant shall obtain a revised ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Pacific Highway. The highway has been constructed to current state standards and no additional right -of -way or street construction is required. However, the sidewalk width is substandard and the applicant should be required to construct a new sidewalk to a width of eight feet, consistent with the existing new sidewalks in the area. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along both sides of SW Pacific Highway and the applicant should place the facilities located along this frontage underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The existing eight inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Pacific Highway and has sufficient capacity to serve this development. 3. STORM SEWER: Currently, the site is partially covered by the existing building and an asphalt concrete parking lot that both drain in a southerly direction toward SW Pacific Highway. The proposed site development will decrease the amount of impervious area. The applicant is advised that the state typically requires on -site detention in order to connect to the existing underground storm drain systems in all state highways. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Requiring surface water quality facilities on small sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the city. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depressions or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities. Regional facilities, funded by fees in -lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. Therefore, the applicant should be required to pay the fee in -lieu of constructing an on -site facility. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this proposal and stated that an exterior lighting plan for the perimeter of the building and parking lot shall be submitted for review and approval. The applicant provided plans to the Police Department in response to this concern. - 5. Agency Comments: The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this application and provided the following requirements based on their review of the site plan and traffic study: NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 3 • • 1. Half street curbs, gutters and sidewalk improvements need to be (7: made. 2. On site detention is required if the applicant proposes to connect to ODOT's drainage system. 3. Cross over easements with adjacent properties should be provided, upon redevelopment of these properties. The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and requested that plans be submitted for review and approval of hydrant locations. The Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed this proposal and has stated that storm drainage and water quality treatment should be treated on -site. Erosion control should be in accordance with the February 1994 E.C. Handbook. The Building Department, the Tualatin Valley Water District, GTE and the Advanced Planning Division have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to construct additional dining room area to an existing restaurant. A restaurant use is a permitted use as allowed under Section 18.62 (Use Classifications) as provided under the permitted uses provided for under the General , Commercial Uses. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot area and the minimum lot width shall be an average of 50 feet for parcels in the C -G zoning district. The site has an average parcel width of approximately 120 feet which exceeds the average width standards of the C -G zone. The site is approximately 30,568 square feet. The C -G zone allows a maximum of 85% of the site to be developed with buildings and impervious surfaces. The applicant proposes lot coverage of 77% of the site for coverage with impervious surfaces which complies with the standard. Setback and Height: Section 18.64.050 states that there is no front yard setback. There is no side yard setback facing the street. The side and rear yard setback shall be 20 feet where a C -G zone abuts a residential zoning district. As indicated on the site plan, setback requirements for the new additions are satisfied. The C -G zone allows a building height of up to a maximum height of 45 feet. The proposed building addition contains architectural features with a maximum height of 25 feet which complies with the standard. The building also complies with the special setback requirements for new development SW Pacific Highway which is 50 feet from the centerline of SW Pacific Highway. The addition would be located a minimum of 95 feet from the centerline of SW Pacific Highway. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100 requires that the applicant submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a minimum of 15% of the site. The applicant submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location, and shrubs and ground cover to be provided which indicated 22% of the site is proposed to be landscaped which complies with the standard. It is suggested that the property owner provide landscaping and ongoing maintenance for areas within the "jug handle turn around" island in SW Pacific Highway which creates an intersection for traffic traveling to the Tigard Cinema. This area appears to receive little maintenance. Generally, landscaped areas within adjoining publicly dedicated street NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 4 • • rights -of -way are the responsibility of the adjoining property owner to maintain. It is also recommended that the landscape plan be revised to show landscaping along the western property line towards SW Pacific Highway. This area is presently a mixture of overgrown weeds and vines which also appear to receive little maintenance. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site has approximately 120 feet of frontage along SW Pacific Highway, therefore the applicant is required to provide street trees. The applicant shall provide a street tree within the landscape buffer along the eastern property line which is pruned to comply with the clear vision requirements. Screening. Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands which have been provided is three feet. Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Parking lot trees shall be designed to provide a minimum of one tree for each seven parking spaces. The applicant has provided one tree for each 5.70 parking spaces. The landscaped island areas measure a minimum of three feet in width. Much of the parking lot is screened from view from SW Pacific Highway due to the location of the restaurant in front of portions of the parking lot. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The matrix states that where a parking lot of 4 to 50 spaces abuts a residential development a required buffer and screening width of 10 feet shall be provided. The matrix also requires that where a commercial development abuts a residential area a buffer width of 20 feet shall be provided. The site abuts a residentially zoned and developed area along the western property line. A 10 foot buffer and screening area is required along the western property line for portions of the parking lot which abut a residentially zoned area. The existing site improvements include buffering and screening materials within a five foot six inch buffer area along the western property line. Portions of the existing restaurant are constructed at 13 feet to the property line which is also nonconforming. The matrix requires a 20 foot setback for commercial structures to residentially zoned property. These existing site improvements are nonconforming. Because the applicant has not proposed to increase the nonconforming status of these improvements it is recommended that improvements be made to the existing landscape screening materials within the existing buffer width. Given the size and maturity of the existing arborvitaes along the western property line the applicant has requested a reduction to the current NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 5 • buffer requirement. The applicant has proposed to provide replacement arborvitaes to cover gaps in the screening, to cultivate soils, prune and add ground cover materials. The existing shrubs measure 12 to 18 feet in height, based on the size of the existing shrubs it is expected that the revised landscape plan will continue to provide sufficient screening and buffering. Provision of vinyl slats material within the existing chain link fence has also been proposed to further screen the restaurant from adjoining residential areas. It is recommended that additional arborvitaes be provided to further screen and buffer portions of the restaurant which abut a residential zoning district to the west of the site. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. Obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided all branches above three feet and below eight feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed improvements on the site plan comply with the requirement. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106 requires a minimum of one parking space for each 50 square feet of dining room area plus one space for each two employees. The plan indicates 2,556 square feet of dining room area is to be provided which requires 51 spaces. The applicant also states that six employees will work at the site which requires three spaces for a total of 54 parking spaces. A total of 52 parking spaces are proposed. The site and landscape plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of 54 parking spaces. To comply with this requirement the percentage of compact spaces may be increased to a maximum of 40 percent of the required parking rather than the current 23 percent. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires three disabled parking spaces if 51 to 75 parking spaces are provided. This proposed site plan shows the provision of three disabled person parking spaces in compliance with the requirement. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106 requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The revised site plan shall provide bicycle parking in accordance with the ratio which is determined for the required parking spaces. The site presently indicates the provision of four bicycle racks. Additional bicycle racks may be required if additional parking spaces are necessary. The racks proposed location may interfere with pedestrian walkways. It is recommended that the site plan locate the bicycle racks so as to avoid conflicts with pedestrian walkways. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one access onto SW Pacific Highway. The access provided is 30 feet in width with 24 feet paved ( NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 6 • • • minimum, thereby satisfying this requirement. The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed the current design and has not recommended changes to the design of the driveway onto SW Pacific Highway. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. Walkways shall be provided where feasible from adjoining developments. The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in which pedestrian access must cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots. Such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet when appropriate pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. Based on the limited number of parking spaces and aisles there are no appropriate locations for designated pedestrian crossings on this site. The site and landscape plan shall be revised to provide a pedestrian access point to the adjoining development - to the northeast of the site. Signs: Section 18.114 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C -G zone. All new signage shall be reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recvclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on -site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick -up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, waste assessment, comprehensive recycling plan, or franchised hauler review and sign -off. The applicant shall comply with one of the approved methods of complying with waste disposal and recycling plan options. Transportation Planning Rule. The portion of the Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8, 1994, that applies to this application is OAR 660- 12- 045(4)(b). This section states that new retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit through the following measures: a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop or station; b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and, - c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit stops. The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct, safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by removing other barriers to pedestrian access. Building entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct, safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development and the transit stop. New retail and office buildings located on transit streets should have at least one public entrance facing the transit street or, if not facing, be within a specified distance of the transit route. A combination of building orientation, distance and pedestrian amenities can work together to display and direct a person to NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 7 • • . • an entrance. The site addresses these issues by providing a building entrance which is clearly visible from SW Pacific Highway and served by transit uses. A walkway has been provided from the main entrance of the restaurant to SW Pacific Highway in compliance with the requirement. SECTION IV. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies , �/ 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ONO y7 1 - 4'7 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. • 3. Appal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City-Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal.. fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. /d 'Z�'y� 4. Ouestions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639- 4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 r 7444 11.9-01-611/ PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Assistant Planner \ /tE' APPROVED BY: Richard Sewer ff DATE Senior Planne NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0018 - MAZATLAN PAGE 8 1LL210NI4 1 I MOAN g NYId NOLLVV* w J04N1 ONV 1N3NId013A30 311S ® is«mu 1 1 . 1 � nwr� it auaaIa3 an awn - 1 • ` ONO�1■ ri ONE L= NO 111011,001 1 1 1 to/ oh emus 711 MUG IV flrw /11110011 OA PM u 10 'X` .m- urun 7:1 ao ar aot ttro omton aloN I - l a u - NMI S \ `` J 1 1 1 ONLLOq 11 a07I10 O ... 1 - - 1 orol WYi O■ L 1n1aOWI1 - - ... f :A .._ -� '2 s.. . nom— !.„, • „� ` ��__ E P • " m . } , -v 1 1 • g t o rs K . i ... - 1 .; %,• . :!:..3...,c•: / .... •• ,,,, • ,, ... :::::::::.:::::•:.V / - . „ 1 ....„L__ ::______ i ( } ' Ili f te e , : ol1 2P' \\ � MI • �ZC - :r3 n p•rir �� • \ ' 1 Imu rr I s � �-. ........, asks awe 1104 0 X 1 . ' 4,- \(.11 y n ; ®y, ® ® ®® ® ®®® 0®®a® ® ®0 ®®®®®a1®®® p ii ill ti CD 9 4 11111111111111111 � 1 1 111 11 111 1!1; x r r lill: i II 1 g ii a Y Q M A 17 v � 1 a 1 1 .' I 1 1 ' •{ �'AM 1 li iii M 0 z II tld 11 a !II I1 1 1 III i l. 1 k/ o 0 11‘11111 i�� : a a �I ; /Ni � I�1 ��1 a j� 11 II � 9 I 111 , r , a t11 t AA 1t li1 ; • b :R = �� 1 i • 1 tl 11 )i 1 1 IN ■ F 1 ' s , ! 'I ; . . l, p " 11. 411 1 411 1 H � R T 1 - 8 ii i ii i 1 1 a III ` i i R a..% 1 Irasq i Q a 1 ill 1 •tu • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. .� o --7 ---- (---\ CT . - • - IP. .• . . . . ,.. . Di 11 11 I I I I I. I I I! 1 J! .. 1 1 1 1 1 1 I SPRUCE sr I I I I l =( 1 t T 4 All 1 m • I m > m r • ! 1 - Q r � M / R w v z J / Z ,i r. ______: V .L , r � * a. 0 111P1 1 =III - ! • I _ < o - cc _ BAYLOR _ ♦ R 9y`11 ` ao v - m� , ir - / p • '�-. CLINTON vE OARTM o (0 VICINITY CASE 140. EXHIBIT M A P SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -001e III ple,94.-4/61,„s,,,/ �D . • DN. APPLICATION AND PERMIT TO a CONSTRUCT APPROACH ROAD / PERMIT NUMBER 94A HIGHWAY DIVISION HIGHWAY NAME MILEPOINT ENGINEERS STATION Pacific Hwy -99W 8.15 28 +60 HIGHWAY NUMBER COUNTY E OF HIGHWAY APPROACH TO SERVE NORTH ❑ EAST 1W Washington ❑ SOUTH ❑ WEST Mazatlan Restaurant BETWEEN OR NEAR LANDMARKS HIGHWAY REFERENCE MAP AND ATTACHED DRAWING NUMBERS Jug Handle AND SW Villa Ridge Way 3V -122 & 5B -24 -2 APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS BOND REOUIRED AMOUNT OF BOND REFERENCE RYES ❑ NO OAR 734. 50-025(6) $ 5,000.00 INSURANCE REOUIRED Mazatlan Maxican Restaurant REFERENCE = ADMINISTRATIVEFEE 11619 SW Pacific Hwy OYES ❑ NO OAR 734 -50- 025(3 ❑ TEMPORARY DEPOSIT Tigard, OR. 97223 AMOUNT CHECK NUMBER $ 50.00 16998 DISTRICT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE COMPLETE APPLICATION RECEIVED X Sam Hunaidi REGION ENGINEER OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE X UTILITY PERMIT SUPERVISOR APPROVAL DATE TE EPHONENUMBER: 228 -3413 X _ APPLICANT APPLICATION DATE X ) ___ vse RE FE COMPLETION OAR P 344- 5 0- 0 5 0( DATE: 06/30/95 The applicant declares that he /she is the owner or lessee of the real property adjoining the above described highway and has the lawful authority to apply for this permit. When this application is approved by the Department of Transportation, the applicant is subject to the terms and provisions contained herein and attached hereto: and the terms of Oregon Administrative Rule, Chapter 734, Division 50, which is by this reference made a part of this permit. Copies of the Rule may be obtained from the District Maintenance Supervisor's office. Issuing of permits under these regulations is not a finding of compliance with the statewide planning goals or the acknowledged comprehensive plan for the area. Permits are issued subject to the approval of city, county or other governmental agencies having either joint supervision over the section of highway or authority to regulate land use by means of zoning and /or building regulations. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to obtain any such approval including, where applicable, local govemment determination of compliance with the statewide planning goals. (OAR 734.50 -055) SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1 — If the proposed application requires traffic control devices and /or special road construction, the applicant shall provide a copy of this application to the affected local government. The original application must be signed by the local government official. LOCAL GOVE ENT:OFFI L SIGNA TITLE DATE u-w /Z — Z 3- 2 — Within 48 hours re e in rig work and after completing the permit work, the applicant or his contract all notify the District Representative at telephone number 229-5G02 3- This permit will supersede permit #'s 8062(09/17/57), 10414 (05/09/60),20699(08 /08/73). 4- A permenent cross -over easement must be provided to ODOT prior to costruction for all the area fronting the state right -of- way,enough to build a new joint access between this applicant and the adjacent property owner. 5- A joint access will be required at the time any of the adjacent property owners decide to redevelope the property. 6- See attached "Exhibit A" for more details. TYPE 4 APPROACH ROAD — CURBED HIGHWAY NOTE All material and workmanship shall be in accordance with the cur- rent State of Oregon Standard Specification for Highway Construction. I Drwy. I I I R/W Line m 1 - I w= 25' w,= 33' x = 4' K= 8' ■ A \ \ ANGLE OF SKEW APPROACH TYPE CURB TYPE i ** 90° " " , 'Y W B \ L B r * (;7 o t e goo �J 2 NOTES: W = WIDTH OF DRIVEWAY Q W I K = DISTANCE FROM FACE OF CURB TO BACK OF P / \ PRESENT OR FUTURE WALK OR 10 FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS C '_C on c Curb e - 1 I ___tC W, = SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE PLAN x- SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE 734.3307E (5-88) SEE BACK OF APPLICATION Droducsd by STATE PRINTING • • " Exhibit A " Mazatlan Maxican Restaurant Hwy 1W, MP 8.15 7- This permit also include the construction of curb, sidewalk, drainage connection,paving, grading, landscaping, as per final approved plans. 8- All work will be in conformance with ADA standards. 9- This access will serve Tax lot # 500 located at 11619 SW Pacific Hwy in Tigard. 10 -See attached sheet for additional general provisions. X , Applicant's Initials • • Page 1 of 3 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS POLELINE PIPELINE AND BURIED CABLE PERMITS APPLICANT Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant HIGHWAY 1W M.P. 8.15 Worksite: X 3) Applicant must call for utility locates before digging (1- 800 - 332 - 2344). You may be held liable for damages. X 4) Applicant shall have a copy of this permit and all attachments of the work site. They shall be available to District Maintenance Manager or representative at their request X 5) Permit inspection fees are estimated to be $ 320.00 (order to render service.) A deposit of this amount submitted to the District office will be required prior to beginning of work. Charges will be made on an actual cost basis. _ 6) Contractor to acknowledge receipt of and review of, by letter, the Oregon Administrative Rules (Chapter 734 -55) goveming miscellaneous facilities and operations on the highway right of way as the goveming provisions of this permit or agreement. _ 7) Access control fence must be maintained during construction and restored to it's original or better condition after construction is complete. X 8) The permittee shall not use the right of way to display advertising signs or merchandise of any kind. X 9) The stopping and parking of vehicles upon State Highway right of way for the maintenance of adjoining property or in furtherance of any business transaction or commercial establishment is strictly prohibited. _ 10) All grass and small brush within the work area shall be rotary or flail mowed to ground level prior to the beginning of work to facilitate clean up. Disturbed areas shall be reseeded with grass native to the area in an appropriate seeding time. X 11) The spreading of mud or debris upon any State Highway is strictly prohibited and violation shall be cause for immediate cancellation of the permit. Clean up shall be at applicant's expense. The highway shall be cleaned of all dirt and debris at the end of each work day, or more frequently if so determined by the District Manager or representative. X 12) All equipment shall be parked off the right -of -way or in areas acceptable to the District Manager or representative. X 13) Permittee shall replace any landscape vegetation or fences that are destroyed. Any damage that is not fully recovered within one year shall be replaced by ODOT at the expense of the permittee. _ 14) Applicant shall obtain an application and Permit for Trimming or Spraying Trees prior to the cutting of trees and brush on the highway right of way (applications are available at the District Office). X 15) Applicant will install and maintain landscaped area as shown on the attached drawings. Planting shall be limited to !ow growing shrubs, grass or flowers that do not attain sufficient height to obstruct clear vision in any direction. The commission or Engineer shall have the right to remove said landscaping at any time such removal may appear to the Commission to be in the public interest, without liability of loss, injury, or damage of any nature whatsoever. Traffic: X 16) The work area during construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto. Flaggers must have a card or certificate indicating their completion of an approved work zone traffic control course. X 17) Contractor to provide a detailed traffic control plan for each place of the work, showing signs and cones. Plans to be submitted for approval by the District Manager or representative SAM HUNAIDI in advance ofconstruction or maintenance. X 18) Contractor shall maintain all existing traffic control devices during construction, then re- install permanently per MUTCD standard and District Manager specifications. XPPLICANTS INITIALS • • Page 2 of 3 X 19) All damaged highway signs shall be replaced by the Highway Division at the expense of the applicant. _ 20) Freeway traffic control shall be done by State forces at the expense of the applicant. Advance planning and notification required due to work schedule of highway maintenance crews. We require at least two weeks advance notification to schedule traffic control. X 21) No work will be permitted on the roadway during hours of darkness, nor between 6:OOam and 9:OOam, or 3:OOpm and 6:OOpm without prior authorization of the District Manager or representative. _ 22) Hours of work shall be Drainage: X 23) On site storm drainage shall be controlled within the applicants property. No blind connections to existing state facilities. _ 24) Excavation shall not be done on the ditch slopes. Trench excavation shall either be at ditch bottom or outside the ditch area. _ 25) When excavation is in ditch bottom with slope greater than 6%, erosion protection shall be used with 2' -0 size rock laid and compacted in the bottom of ditch and side slopes to a minimum depth of 6' or as directed by the District Manager or representative. _ 26) Only earth or rock shall be used as fill material and shall slope so as not to change or adversely affect existing drainage. Fine grade and seed the finished fill with native grasses to prevent erosion. X 27) A storm drainage study will be required by a licensed Hydrologist meeting the standards of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) when any of the following conditions apply: a( whenever a 4' pipe is inadequate to serve the developed area, b) development site is 1 acre or larger in size and directly or indirectly affects state facilities, c) or as directed by the District Manger or representative. X 28) An advance deposit of $ 500.00 (order to render service) is required for State Hydrologist to review and approve storm study calculations. X 29) You will be required to provide 'on site' retainage for storm water run -off that exceeds that of underdeveloped site. X 30) Stour► drainage study shall be a X 10 year, _ 25 year, _ 50 year, _ 100 year, other year. X 31) All water discharged to an ODOT storm sewer system will be treated prior to discharge. All requests for connection to an ODOT storm sewer system will meet any requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System that could include: local jurisdiction approval of on -site water quality treatment facilities, development of an operation and maintenance plan for any on -site water quality treatment facility as determined by local jurisdiction. Excavation /Construction: X 32) Open cutting of pavement shall only be allowed in areas specifically approved by District Manager or representative. _ 33) Trench Backfill in surface shall be according to the typical attached as Exhibit _ 34) Open cutting of the highway will be allowed with construction in accordance with OAR 734-55 -040). All excavation in paved areas shall be back filled and the roadway surface patched before the end of each shift. Temporary patching shall be cold mix, and permanently hot mix patched within of cut. The permittee shall be fully responsible for maintenance of temporary patching. (see T trench typical in other side) X 35) Compaction test will be required for each open cut or for every Two Lavers of a continuous trench by standard AASHTOT99 method. At the discretion of the District Manager or representative results of such tests shall be given to District Manager or representative at applicants sole cost. X 36) Controlled Density Fill (CDF) shall be used as surface back -fill material in place of crushed rock in open trenches that affect the travel portions of the highway. A 3/4' rock will be used for the aggregate. The amount of concrete used shall not exceed 3% of the total mixture's weight. Maximum compressed strength must not exceed 100 - 150 psi. X ji_ INITIALS • Page3of3 X 37) Surface restoration shall be a minimum of 4' of hot AC compacted in 2' lifts, or match existing AC depth, whichever is greater. X 38) All rock shall be from a source that is certified by the state. X 39) Any area of cut or damaged asphalt shall be restored in accordance with the attached '7' Type drawing. For a period of 2 years following the patched paved surface, the applicant shall be responsible for the condition of said pavement patches, and during that time shall repair to the District Manager or representatives satisfaction any of the patches which become settled, cracked, broken or otherwise faulty. _ 40) An overlay to seal an open cut area shall be completed prior to the end of the construction season, or when minimum temperature allows. Typical overlay shall cover the affected area from edge of pavement to edge of pavement and taper longitudinally with the highway as a function of highway speed on each end. (i.e. 55mph highway section shall have a 1- 1/2' in 55' taper) Taper may be adjusted by the District Manager as required. For a period of two years following this patching of the surface, the applicant shall be responsible for the condition of said pavement patches, and during that time shall repair to the surface, the applicant shall be responsible for the condition of said pavement patches, and during that time shall repair to the District Manager or representative's satisfaction any of the patches which become settled, cracked, broken or otherwise faulty. X 41) All highway crossings shall be bored or jacked. Bore pits shall be located behind ditch line or in areas satisfactory to the District Office. Unattended pits shall be protected by a 6' fence or shall be backfilled or steel plated and pinned. _ 42) Lines that are bored or jacked shall be encased in steel casing, 4' minimum in size, meeting A.S.T.M a 139 B (No hydro) specifications and shall have a wall thickness meeting recommendation in the N.U.C.A. 'Horizontal Earth Boring and Pipe Jacking Manual No. 2' 1986 edition. _ 43) Trench backfill outside of ditch line or in approved areas can be native soil compacted at optimum moisture in 12' layers to 90% or greater of the maximum density. X 44) Native materials found to be unsatisfactory for compaction shall be disposed of off the project, and granular backfill used. X 45) Trench backfill in rock slope or shoulder shall be crushed 1'-0 or 3/4'-0 size rock compacted at optimum moisture in 12' layers to 95% of maximum density by standard AASHTO T99 method. _ 46) Where excavation is on fill slope steeper than 2:1 slope protection shall be used with 4' -0 size rick laid evenly to a minimum depth of 12'. X 47) No more than 300' of trench longitudinally along the highway shall be open at any one time and no trench shall be left in an open condition overnight. X 48) Areas of disturbed cut and fill slopes shall be restored to a condition suitable to the District Manager. Areas of erosion to be inlaid with an acceptable rip rap material. X 49) All underground utilities shall be installed with a 3' or more clearance from guardrail post and attachments. X 50) My area of cut or damaged concrete shall be restored in accordance with the attached Typical Section -Pipe Section under sidewalk. _ 51) Signs and pedestals shall be placed as near the highway right of way line as practical. In no case shall pedestals and line markers be located within the highway maintenance area. _ 52) No cable plowing is allowed within the lateral support of the highway asphalt (i.e.: at 6' lower than the edge of the asphalt, no plowing within 9' of the edge of the asphalt). _ 53) All pipe and bridge attachment hardware shall be hot dip galvanized and threaded area shall be painted with an approval coating following assembly. _ 54) Expansion joints of an approved type to be located in the close proximately with the expansion joints of the structure. _ 55) Adhesive anchors only are acceptable for support brackets -two acceptable adhesive anchors are listed on the attached sheet. _ 56) Field drilled holes in the stiffeners and areas damaged by drilling shall be painted with two coasts of zinc -rich primer prior to assembly. _ 57) Neoprene gaskets to be placed between the mounting plates and stiffeners. X 58) Plans are approved in general only. Field changes may be required by the District Manager or representative. X,APPLICANT'S INiT1ALS • ! COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal T P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684 -0360 Notice T 8 0 2 6 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 RECEIVED Legal Notice Advertising OCT 19 1994 •City of tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •Tigard , Oregon 9 7 2 2 3 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit • • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 S.W. Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S 1 36DB, tax lot 500). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site Development Review request to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes., APPLICABLE REVIEW STATE OF OREGON, ) CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.84, 18.92, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) 18.94, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial). The C -G zone al- 1, Kathy Snyder lows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real es- tate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard– Tua latin T�mf a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 drinking establishments among other uses. and 193.020; published at Ti ga rr1 in the r -- aforesaid county and state; that the ?`" I — ST)R 94 -0018 Mazatlan . _ F— `, �,71- --- -1 " , _ __ a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the :flans I - — - ,fr' entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and I ~,,�% •`' consecutive in the following issues: - { i -- Y % I October 13,1994 j 1 fuff 1 • �" t -.------' / � r Subscribed and sworn to ='•re me thisl da of Oct() �. .•« 4/1/ , Notary P lic for Oregon ill LIIIII My Commission Expires: Illa II III AFFIDAVIT aJ iu i I IIi Ilkill . frrali SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0023 VARIANCE VAR 94 -0008 BELMAR/PLAID PANTRY LOCATION: 15995 S.W. Hall Boulevard (WCTM 2S1 11DD, tax lot 201). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site Develop- ment Review request to allow construction of a 3,875 square foot addition to an existing 2,400 square foot retail building and variance approval to reduce the required 20 foot setback abutting a residential zone to 10 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.60, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150, and 18.164. ZONE: C -N (Neighborhood Commercial). The C -N zoning district is to provide convenience goods and services within a cluster of stores. The uses permitted in the neighborhood center include convenience markets, beauty shops, barber shops, and repair shops. The range of uses is limited to those uses which can be sustained through a limited trade area. ; J_) L X1111 II MOW/ • M 1111111I1ii1S F �� 11 //- -- - %Air, I— -- — Cr.� rr -- t / j u uiuffi ji'�, minimum - ■ 111111111111E : �l- /e �>III61: : � 0 �� I • 1- /1 �� . maims �. Ri -� // _ N �� `�, ��= A11111i1111 �Fd11 11= Cu f w/ iU t 111111111'1 .. ■11""1 j '� IIIIr'/ Ilui, sill. iniii>r4 II IJ • . • TIGARD USA 11 I ¢ HIGH SCHOOL TREATMENT a PLANT d Z 0 W 1 awz D _ICJ f ow cn The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be _ final on October 24, 1994. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290 (A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written ap- peal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The dead- line for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM October 24. 1994. TT8026 – Publish October 13, 1994. RECEIVED •NING I PACIF P.O. Box 80040 NOV 0 41994 Portland, OR 97280 November 2, 1994 Mr. Gary McNeal ODOT, District 2A 2131 SW Scholls Ferry Road Portland, OR 97221 RE: MAZATLAN RESTAURANT EXPANSION JOB NO. 4- 1503 -0101 Dear Gary: Enclosed, please find a schematic joint access drawing to be referred to upon the reconstruction of 99W and the demolition of the "Jug handle" that presently fronts the subject site. From my conversations with Jim Evans of this office, you will need this drawing to re -write ODOT's conditions of approval requirements as originally provided to the City of Tigard as part of their site design review procedures. If you require additional information in order to re -write your conditions, or if you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to call Jim Evans or myself. Sincerely, 73cEnc av-z-a David C. Poulson P. . Project Manager CC: Don Hennig - Russell Construction Mark Roberts - City of Tigard Jim Evans - W &H Pacific DCP /mlp (503) 626 -0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services z , XREE'S • • -C.,, \ �O is C, bk. 1.9 4 �0 °ri • \ !Jff/ I. IMPACT ao.Aar .. t • 'i Op I . \\\\\ t B? i • l i / •• 7 77 ... . - ► � 1' Z ♦♦ - -- ' _..- • / ` • . • l ( c- C. i♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦�� ♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦6♦♦♦♦♦♦•i \ % • ►♦ ► ♦♦♦♦♦SCI `\ 7 ♦♦ ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦t ®� 1 t is / • �j ` ♦ .. ♦O. ® MAZA TL AN EXPANSION FUTURE DRIVEWAY PLAN NO _ REVISION BY DATE APP WITH REMOVAL OF SURVEYED BY: \V.\H PACIFIC JUG HANDLE ACCESS 0406 ILY. 212b.. Aveas. . 122111702. 01 07000 SCALE: 1' =20' PLOT DATE: 10/25/94 nme WO 40-0 0 Ts (0) 620-0773 .. + ` DRAWN BY: TGB Designed By FILE NAME: XXXXXXXX 1 OF .— - 1 II II l DMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 8 017 OCT 1 2 1994 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 CITY OF TIGAR ® Legal Notice Advertising . • City Of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit _ • • SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 S.W. Pacific Highway (WCTM 1 S 1 36DB, tax lot 500). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site Development Review request to allow expansion of the . existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION , well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW STATE OF OREGON, CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.84, 18.92, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss. 18.94, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18:150, and 18.164. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial). The C -G zone al- 1, Kathy Snyder lows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, being first duly sworn, depose and say that 1 am the Advertising professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real es- Director, or his principal clerk, of theTlgard Tualatin Time tate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 dru►kmg establishments among other uses. and 193.020; published at Tigard in the - - -� — afo @said county _and stele; that the r - Y T-'- S ite Develop P•Zazalan Expan. (3 Map ;, r-+ a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the - : 4-4r I ,/ - L i r--1 ---, entire issue of said newspaper for ONF successive and r" consecutive in the following issues: —� M MEI October 6,1994 l ■j -11.11 1 .' I» »„-- X(aL cj , Mil E Subscribed and sworn it :fore me this 6th day of Octobe] 101 1 Mill L' . - 6 6,6, ,.. 4 1 Not Public for Oregon ri I �'r'^ My Commission Expires: — 7 1111111 AFFIDAVIT sr ,1_ r .. In N'''- " --° ;; ---- ----____ .. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0023 VARIANCE VAR 94 -0008 BELMAR/PLAID PANTRY LOCATION: 15995 S.W. Hall Boulevard (WCTM 2S1 11DD, tax lot 201). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site Develop- ment Review request to allow construction of a 3,875 square foot addition to an existing 2,400 square foot retail building and variance approval to _ reduce the required 20 foot setback abutting a residential zone to 10 feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.60, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.134, 18.150, and 18.164. ZONE: C -N (Neighborhood Commercial). The C -N zoning district is to provide convenience goods and services within a cluster of stores. The uses permitted in the neighborhood center include convenience markets, beauty shops, barber shops, and repair shops. The range of uses is limited to those uses which can be sustained through a limited trade area. IJ 141 N. 01111 1 mmHg In !a:u.1: •R to; i ,, - �Il11il11volc :, .. Gnnr.t k.i.:, c��S ^tn J rCInn on ' • , �� liiip_ Ar ∎1 , .. ■��:1111111111 IA... ,` 1111111:11111111 Irku_ 1 InIum r/P -Ins Illlllllllllc= eis r E MI r 4.4,0111 4011111101. Ito,. via AIIIIAIIIME = :,,rir 4tor 7•IINGI: :: 1$ 4 41 I .1 iZt T 1.2 el il :,.=i ,,,, 4'.. 11111111111 /III ll= ` i1 N i g / e g -r..► �w 111111 11 1'1 1 I1 * !I. 1 ■ _ � ■er " i l R. OUR } TIGARD . USA Q Cr HIGH TREATMENT SCHOOL PLANT i z r sow f MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 94 -0017 BURTON/WINDSOR LOCATION: 11000 S.W. 121st Avenue (WCTM 1S1 34CA, tax lot 600). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for a Minor ' Land Partition approval to divide one parcel of approximately 20,147 square feet into two parcels of- approximately 10,791 and 9,356 square feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.50.050, 18.88.040 (C) (1), 18.162.040, 18.162.050, and 18.164. ZONE: R-4.5 (Residential, 4.5 units/acre). The R-4.5 zone allows single - family residential units, public support facilities, residential treat- ment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home oc- cupations, temporary uses, and accessory structures among other uses. - - -- _ e �� F E RRO — - / SCNG ��S g MI lei mailkeffitto * iii .z4; . II 1111/111111 ■11t r1140, al 116 kik • 11010 • 4 coe 1i11u�1 lik • mo w. r ��e �,��& N1114111.111 m iii — I2%� 11■ /■ ■i 1111! 1111l11iiuir/ 111LI!I!11 ■ 101 11111 - r ; ' m 11114 !uhulhinus s -- ' ,..aailli R 111111311.,1111 1 NM iMifinifilii._ 111111.1111. Ili° ■ ■1111111111111 4 lil Imiun ISIIIII R on n �;;as:a�.��tL . 1111 Milan r; i1!■a■■ In The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on October 17. 1994. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290 (A) and Section 18.32.370 of the'Community Development Code, which provides that a written ap- peal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The dead- line for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM October 17. 1994. TT8017 - Publish October 6. 1994. • (41 December 6, 1995 Don Hennig CITY OF TIGARD Russell Construction OREGON 2211 NW Front Avenue, Suite 202 Portland, OR 97209 Re: Removal of existing billboard sign Dear Don; This letter is in response to your request for clarification concerning removal of the existing billboard sign which is apparently located partially within the public right -of -way in front of the Mazatlan Restaurant at 11619 SW Pacific Highway. The State has requested that the owner remove the sign which is partially located within the right -of -way in order to construct required public improvements on both the adjoining Taco Bell site and the subject property. Please contact Mr. Sam Hunaidi with the State Highway Division at 229 -5002 concerning the status of the sign removal. The City's Community Development Code Chapter 18.144.070 prohibits billboard signs. Chapter 18.114.110 (D) allows billboards located along SW Pacific Highway to remain until June 10, 1998. However, Chapter 18.144.110 (D) states that non - conforming signs which are relocated or reconstructed shall be immediately brought into compliance with the Community Development Code. Because the sign must be relocated or reconstructed to allow for required public improvements the sign is not permitted to be relocated or • reconstructed elsewhere. The Planning Division will allow issuance of building permits, however completion of required public improvements necessitates removal of the sign, therefore Final Occupancy approval of the remodel work is in part contingent on construction of required public improvements. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, !~ • Mark Roberts Assistant Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 . RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION TEL :503 -228 -3413 Oct 24,94 13:45 No.005 P.01 • • FAX COVER 1 of 3 RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION INC. 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE SUITE 202 PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 503 228 3413 FAX 228 2770 10/24/94 Po: Mark Roberts, CAT Fax 684 7297 Fr: Don Hennig Re: Side walk at existing billboard. As requested 8' wide sidewalk lays out per attached sheet 2 with respect to billboard and new radius for weeterly driveway relocated to jug handle. Sheet two new driveway scaled from PDG Sheet 3 also attached which I got from Michael Anderson. „_: .. :..: :..,..<. .. ,, ,.. „ .. . •.r .:... :3..<:1.: ,: ;,i ;. ' •: :17"f'•i!:'i f•1 <;.):• .. ,. i:: >,�. :..f.; i•'• _..i 1.: i•J:r ` > ii�ii:'Z.�Fl, . . , RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION TEL:503- 228 -3413 Oct 24,94 13:45 No.005 P.02 , ' .. '.,,..,:";,•:.;* .: 4: " ° . v F' b . x14 ,: t=-3'.. ∎i... •a j . As: . ` 1 . F r' ■.• b '1 • ..�Y r _ f:� / • ` '\ \ I `,? Ca r' : • •. _• �` ` • \\ . Cy ` . • \ \w _ ' 1 0 Or \ • \.a, 0....... P 1 \ r \fir` / / fg \ : \ .\. . \ \ . * . \..z, \ E . al i " ■ 1 0© C X 1 ---- N \ C EXTEND N. 0 OD \ SIDEWALK TO U I l NE RIVEMIAY AT `y \ ADJA T PROPERTY `° I \ \ \ � � \ N. . \ �� .1. \ \ �/ ; N., • -•-- - Iiir ._ all) C O ki , . \. J ...-% `ter �� ....- .......... a o w M 1: 0 f 40 f_ 8 � . a • SEWER . . ' —UPS . EXISTING . •.UILDING - ;AT PACIFIC ;., �.; I ":i'i" ?" 4"e ri, ►�r rtm�g <°¢ �. rtr�`}r?+t- �* �rrK� ..,:o. . y ?i'wf ,o, -* c.i)' -► : r?i.. , :3 : rte.",-.: .tr.li4 ! ,fi!!., Irtt,, �` .t"t ._:#lst.. c. .?it st t',.`.- r • . ... RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION TEL:503-228-3413 Oct 24,94 13:45 No.005 P.03 iT: ri 0 L . -,- - t ' 31-3 - '1 _ S . i •■ , __ . . . "■ I i ___ • _ zt- -, _ 1 T-• . - I lb ., i , , _ . 7! • — . - ...- .,, p,i .7i . i ..) 0-#.1 .10•,1* v • ..' r `••, — . ' \ •••■• \\ ..\ _ . . .s. 44 ,, 'N, I _ i I / C I . 4 ' t ..... j LEI , _..........___J v. . ____ ......,. , . , r 11 . ..-.- / .. 7 . , :.,-- / •'‘Y ' c 2 / 40 ... , %..., C•J is 1:1 Z x\\ON S g - 2 12 5 1 T1: tal : en , 0 1 1 7 r n E 0._,, c, 1 i - ". ' ' '' ' ' — " ' ' '" '''' " ''' • ". ' ' • 4f1 4:" ' l'■., :Nf:7'.V.' - RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION TEL:503- 228 -3413 Oct 14,94 9:41 No.003 P.03 • • esp QFfictet te. , j, 4HC� C.. - ' ° /6/i3/ 14-- P7 1. . CONSTRUCTION INC. RECORD OF CONVERSATION PROJECT : M 41- evil DATE: A-1/319 R E F F- R E NC L : 1-A rhi4C, E1 as upo s-/C-J 1 , TIME: i r � s /�ll D ■ 41.1• -t t() ._.....,.-- __ CONVERSED WITfi: 1"i kt- 1 .- (F7J0.. (YOUR NAME) .., nn SU(IrARY OF CONVERSATION: RYt L Ti 04' S cw 0/1hpf ?.1= (v-, n t=1-00A L S o OF Lit J to ac AsiA-449 As.' c F Th- 2 u- I 47--(-J67) - - 1�' c LI yz-mss Pa4suc Ito J (49 (I kp � �..�c= �`tr`3 _____ T-6g i& i L li L l� E4LC, tel.J c - ker c5• IL/ __ I • AT LIM l)■0 t,VA-1 iI.c MCs i 1,14 ({ r '\--/) 11 O _ (-k rlYt. cm ocrw two w> oc c. , p� i l � L r r S?TL ( ( 4 E C . ?cc l! - 1 41 4 S L /Lt? 1 7. ICE f C.P' 2 712/4 ©t art, (4/ 15:: f(:• (.14 t.,0 �rk n�. U4(�'f �y /� U�t.i r'Y ---^ J (.. ►.pJ1 ac‘ J Its W-- Ertl +✓, v r / t t i rc A-1 C+ r7a -/+-1 1-1 C »& c E ; err A (4 0 Srd( M' M/Ma4 t /A) Val Weil �J h� S"( 7 wA UA G ►..4 `t WZr`a i S ! 0 t' ,c c - A/1-6 v A.- (G, , or MO r e t `( n0 .1 j OR CAJJN .: t,,� 'T �i• —F �. c ` 4t* LAC* C i l AVID CJ C.: , L nri41 a Ski 'jr �1 - r Yi{r"t . t S X11- {:"s'� vpri.- 1 ei (...dorms Fir- C -)56 P t" 'it (n Mt . IT IS ASSUMED THAT BOTH PARTIES AGREE TO THE CONTENTS OF THIS RECORD OF CONVERSATION IF YOU Do NOT RESPOND IN WRITING WITHIN Two (2) WORKING DAYS OF RECEIVING THIS RECORD. N 4../tic 2 <aat -rLii 714.44- 6 -it, 4 L-0 sc-/Yy' RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION TEL:503- 228 -3413 Oct 14,94 9:40 No.003 P.01 • • • FAX COVER 1 of 5 RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION INC. 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE SUITE 202 PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 503 228 3413 FAX 228 2770 10/13/94 To: Mark Roberts, COT Fax 684 7297 Fr: Don Hennig Re: Mazatlan Reetaurant 1. Record of Conversation with Kelley Jennings, COT PD re: lighting and landscaping approved. 2. 1'11 show easterly side walk (now 8' wide) extension dying to new approach of residences to Jug handle. Thanks for resolution of numerous other issues: -new 4' sidewalk at NE corner to property line resolves no sidewalk designated in /across Mazatlan parking lot. -no USA storm water quantity or quality issues or costs since impervious area is decreased but I will provide 10 year storm study and detention system per ODOT requirements. - Curbs. sidewalk, approach and flares, storm interties per ODOT. -52 to 54 spaces by eliminating island and 15 standard spaces to 17 compact on east side. one additional "street tree" will be 1 1/2" Norway maple replacing easterly of two Austrian Pine in island east of approach. -west side landscape and buffer comments resolved by adding 18 addtl arbor vitaes from existing vitae buffer strip to new exit pad from addition and removing vines and weeds in this area and rest of south end of west boundary. -we will move bike rack a foot to west to provide better pedestrian clearance. -"cross over easement" to be resolved with ODOT. -owner will pay undergrounding in lieu" fee of $3,834.75. • -no Tualatin Valley Water Dietriot issues. RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION TEL:503- 228 -3413 Oct 14,94 9:40 No.003 P.02 • • -RCI will provide Gene Birchell WP drawing noting existing hydrant location for TVFR District approval. •-1 "1l demonstrate "minimum standard" re: recycle or solid waste control apace. -no owner /applicant actions required regarding "Findings ", "Agency Comments ", or "Analysis and Conclusions" sections. • • .. RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION TEL :503-228-3413 Oct 14,94 9:42 No.003 P.ud p FVFLOPMFNT Nip • • 1- ALL UTILITIES ME EXISTING IN PLACE AND NOT RE CHANGED OR RELOCATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL , • 2- ONLY EXISTING OFF -SITE NOISE SOURCE IS PACiFR( ♦ • '- THERE ARE No TREES EXISTING ON THE SITE WITH THAN 10" TRUNK DIAMETER AT A POINT 48" ABO' -• �"�!. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OTHER EXISTING TREES .CDN' UC11O r EROSION CONTROL CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT THE SITE DURING ANY EXCAVATION INCLUDING BUT NC �,(n \ \ ' INSTAU.ATION OF STRAW BALES AT THE BOTTOM OF 1 ..... .7 1. SOUTH PROPERTY LINE DUBBING CONSTRUCTION OF St r ? s . : " SURFACE WATFR MANAGEMENT � ` 5 \ ' f EXISTING PAVING + ROOF AREA 26,906 sq•ft- ' / PROPOSED PAVING + ROOF 23,679 sq.ft. , - J _.._.. pROPOS_? 5 KING 4 PARKING REQUIRED - I SPACE PER 30 eq.ft. DINING It . • • C\ ' (2.556 sq.ft.) . 4 220 �� T. - 1 SPACE PER TWO EMPLOYEE © \ •. IND PROPOSED - REGUL :. SPACES •MIN. 8.-B" - - - WHEELCHAIR ACCESSABLE (�n11 - -�•' - - - - -� V` - COMPACT (MIN. 8' -0• : 15' / ® :A o+ (: �i TOTAL PROPOSED _ - • •\ \ :.K1 )j1ALA i Ems '/ ` / , $ t 0 "t• /' , `\ , ate./ `i^ t. 4 _ 1 ■ \ • �_'� � � �� ,. •ice ♦ • ...‘;';'' : . _‘' ‘ "--. * \ . . ' . . ../ e r .• ....r.... e‘■ \K usuMoit 11.. ._� : ••... a . v .. .........••"„Wy . .e.teyb.•,,...• • ■•••■ , . . \ Vie ......, \ S. \ • . i ; c r \ : ■•••••■•■•••• ‘ • .. • • ' ‘;' 4 = 4 • . . .. \ . • . ; . ' . Zi41•••••••• \ .i. • .... \ • • r e il l/ , : I" . • ... :::- :Pi :•. •••• :o f/ ; •••••/"•, ;• , , . . = 0 • . . . . • - . \ .. . 4" : „.. .: •. \1111: Ca I N.' .. :.......'. ../ /.7: 0 , /1: ::. ' . 1 ,......T.D .. ' • . 1 ' '. .. .2, . , . ' - ' -. 1 .. . ,o • • 1 4: / :VW. ••••••••■■ . . • : \ - . . CI:) . . 111A . , .. . ... . Ilift 7 a , . • ! " W . . . • . — — • -+• • . • • 11.1,1TC. r , s ....,. ,. •,. .Y,• •C13 . R'V1C12 1 • dll t - l . • � v 5 " ; ` )> -- 4 2'_, 4145, 727 • `29 .3L. 3— 37 i:,:.,,:,,.,,, 0 _ / N 6 -8 pi 2 ' R — � 10 STALLS 9' -0" @ 600 = 103' -9" - • . a; - / • r 18•R o o (2 # �r. ` �- - -- - - 1 - � 14' ACCESS EASEMENT rm • •'_ ,� \ C N 00 d, 167.86' • • :: • . 175.00' DEED) ....0 ® dG / 11' -6 "R i underground u 1s (. facilities shown 34 are based on fiel. -e4 eys and local utility :0.A.- _ A.FF_A _ __.,5,.73 j F. - ds It shall be the con . tor's full o contact the various utility companies to � �v��A� 4F icitities prior to starting construction. No Fr-EA "E--' �'- -�-LC i :-I r.>EAC7..5- AREA .pensation snail be paid to the contractor for Fr � t DIR IONAL SIGN S[ epoir to these facilities caused by his work ! �l `i� 7,:.: � 7E H' +�a , A.) ENTER J.) DRIVE ond grades shown on the pions shall be ; / L — -- r-, F-- 8.) EXIT ANK • contractor prior to construction. The U —�K 4 C.) ENTER LCO ,II notify the Taco Bell Construction Manager D.) EXIT M. RIGHT ,ncies exist prior to proceeding with O E.) EXIT ONLY N.) LEFT 1 or necessary plan or grade changes. No extra F.) EXIT ONLY 0.) BLANK shall be paid to the controctor for work to be dimensions or grades shown incorrectly on G.) DO NOT ENTER P.) PASSE such notification has not been given. 5 � a H.) DRIVE —THRU 0.) DRIVEF • shall be responsible for providing adequate `i p f R O ED I.) DRIVE —THRU ONLY R.) ,fety devices, protective equipment, and safety d methods to protect the life, health and 9 -2?- s- er subcontractor's. supplier's, and the DATE \ work related to this project. All work and • µ Tres shall be in full conformance with OSHA J - - - -- • and the requirements of local governing ASSIS T DIST. E-1�?Ga. I OREGON ` TATE HWY. HIV. ARCHITE ed final site and building plans must be on— 1 during the construction period \\ SCALE: 1" = 10 " - "" conform to U.B.C. and City of Tigard RUSSELL CONSTRUCTION TEL :503-228-3413 Oct 14,94 9:42 No .003 P.05 Y 1 i - 101 • , . 1 111 II ‘ . . . A ' g S : : . 4 ..... ... . .... . ■— ! ' 11 ■ lkiN in v... . .... , - 11' ;€2 1 p-,+1 • " - ,.....-r- .. ... E ,7,7 A .... ,‘ ! /7 . . . f ... 4 ......,. t t .. C v...4 i t -...... -c. . 113.1.- ... liMPi . „..• . , 7 .. .,....- % ,./ . . •• 7' '4J tu, _., i g x „ , , , 1 g .„-- \r” et. LI E , , , .. n , • ... . . . _... • . . . . . . .. • . .. • • . • 411 411 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mark Roberts September 20, 1994 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer Or RE: SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN RESTAURANT Description: The applicant proposes to enlarge the existing restaurant structure at 11619 SW Pacific Highway known as the Mazatlan Restaurant. The site is located on the north side of the highway, adjacent to the jug handle intersection opposite the entry to the Tigard Cinemas. Findings: 1. STREETS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared by Keech Associates, Inc., Consulting Traffic Engineers, dated September 12, 1994. The report analyzes the effects of the additional traffic, that will be generated by the proposed site improvements, at the existing driveway and the impact to the traffic on SW Pacific Highway, a State Highway. The report concludes that the additional traffic will not significantly affect the traffic utilizing SW Pacific Highway, nor the existing driveway located with -in the jug handle at the traffic signal intersection. The report further indicates that the traffic exiting the Cinema will continue to need the existing traffic signal. No improvements are recommended. The applicant shall obtain a revised ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Pacific Highway. The highway has been constructed to current State standards and no additional right - of -way or street construction is required. However, the sidewalk width is substandard and the applicant should be required to construct a new sidewalk to a width of 8 feet, consistent with the existing new sidewalks in the area. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along both sides of SW Pacific Highway and the applicant should place the facilities located along this frontage underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Pacific Highway and has sufficient capacity to serve this development. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -18 MAZATLAN RESTAURANT PAGE1 3. STORM SEWER: • The site currently is partially covered by the existing building and an asphalt concrete parking lot that both drain in a southerly direction toward SW Pacific Highway. The proposed site development will increase the amount of impervious area. The applicant is advised that the State typically requires on -site detention in order to connect to the existing underground storm drain systems in all state highways. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Requiring surface water quality facilities on small sites would result in numerous facilities that would become a maintenance burden to the City. Furthermore, the applicant has not proposed any such facilities and there are no natural depressions or other areas of this site that are particularly suitable for water quality facilities. Regional facilities, funded by fees in -lieu of construction of these facilities, would provide the required treatment with improved reliability and less maintenance. Therefore the applicant should be required to pay the fee in -lieu of constructing an on -site facility. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right -of -way of SW Pacific Highway (99W). A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of the building permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639- 4171) . 2. The applicant shall remove and replace the existing driveway approach and public sidewalk as shown on the site plan. The sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide as measured from the face of curb. 3. The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream storm drain system will not be unduly affected by the on -site storm drainage run -off. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 -4171) ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -18 MAZATLAN RESTAURANT PAGE2 .. � • ! 4. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the northerly side of Pacific Highway, or pay the fee in- lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639 - 4171) APPROVED: / Randall R. Wooley, C410 Engineer N: \ENGINEER \SDR94- 18.mja ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -18 MAZATLAN RESTAURANT PAGE3 09/22/94 13:50 '5037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 002 /002 • Orego DEPARTMENT OF September 22, 1994 TRANSPORTATION Region 1 Tigard Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 FILE CODE: Attention: Mark Roberts Subject: SDR 94 -0018, Mazatlan Expansion The Oregon Department of Transportation recently received and reviewed the traffic study regarding the Mazatlan site expansion. Based on review of the traffic study, we support the current signalized jug handle intersection which shares access with the theater. Alternative, unsignalized access is not available to the Mazatlan site. In addition to ODOT's previous comments, there are additional conditions for the applicants. These are: • Half - street curb and sidewalk improvements need to be made • On -site detention is required if the applicant proposes to connect to ODOT's drainage system. • Cross -over easements with adjacent properties should be provided, upon redevelopment of these properties. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, please call me at 731 -8232. Laurie Nicholson Development Review Planner K: e cc: Gary McNeel, ODOT District 2A Assistant District Manager 9002 SE McLoughlin Milwaukie, OR 97222 -7394 (503) 731 -8200 734 -1850 (12.93) FAX (503) 731 -8259 • r \»Co LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 9/13/94 Mr. Mark Roberts City of Tigard By Hand Re: Mazatlan Restaurant Mark; Please find attached three copies of Traffic Study by Keech Associates, Inc. for subject project. Forward one copy to Laurie Nicholson please. Sincerely, Don B. Hennig, P.E. Project Manager C: Laurie Nicholson 503 - 228 -3413 FAX # 228 -2770 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE, SUITE 202 o PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 KEECH A SSO CIA TES, INC. Consulting Traffic Engineers 1225 N.W. Murray Blvd., Suite 206 Portland, Oregon 97229 -5552 • (503)641 -6333 FAX (503)643 -8866 September 12, 1994 Mr. Don Hennig Russell Construction, Inc. 2211 NW Front Avenue, Suite 202 Portland, OR 97209 -1820 RE: Traffic Analysis for Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant Dear Mr. Hennig: I have reviewed the proposed addition to the existing Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant, located on the north side of Pacific Highway, near the signalized access to the Act III Theater (about 450 feet east of SW Pfaffle Street). The following are my findings: This site is currently a 3,354 square foot restaurant with 101 seats. The proposed addition will increase the restaurant by 1,465 square feet' and 90 seats, making the total 4,819 square feet and 191 seats. The existing vehicle trip generation from this site is estimated at 289 daily trips and 23 PM peak hour trips. The net increase in trip generation for this site is estimated at 257 trips per day. An increase of 21 trips per hour is anticipated during the PM peak hour, when the site is in full use. Access to the site is via the one -way jug handle which also serves westbound traffic destined for the ACT III Theater. Eastbound vehicles on Pacific Highway access the jug handle via a center turn lane west of the signalized intersection. There does not appear to be any alternative access to and from the site. Observations of the existing PM peak hour traffic flow within the vicinity of the proposed site were done during March of 1994. Additionally, daily volumes on the Act III Theater northbound left exit and the southbound jug handle were measured from Saturday, September 3 through Tuesday, September 6. Tables A and B summarize these findings. • TABLE A EXISTING TRAFFIC (9/94) VEHICLES Act III Theater Exit (Left Turn Volume Only) SAT SUN MON TUE Daily 1,835 1,391 1,434 979 AM Peak Hour 5 6 4 6 PM Peak Hour 196 158 141 91 4th Highest Hour 189 158 141 89 8th Highest Hour 120 89 83 70 TABLE B EXISTING TRAFFIC (9/94) VEHICLES Jug Handle Exit SAT SUN MON TUE Daily 836 523 580 449 AM Peak Hour 2 2 1 3 PM Peak Hour 105 55 69 42 4th Highest Hour 90 46 56 45 8th Highest Hour 53 40 35 30 The only future traffic used in this analysis was that anticipated from the proposed Taco Bell restaurant west of the site. The Pacific Highway at the Act III access currently operates at a "C" level of service or better. The jug handle at the Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant driveway operates at level of service "A ". The left turn movement from eastbound Pacific Highway onto the jug handle operates at level of service "D ". The addition of the site is not anticipated to noticeably change the operation of these intersections. The proposed addition will result in a net change in parking from 54 stalls to 52 stalls. The proposed parking will eliminate two parking spaces near the jug handle which could have potentially caused congestion within the site. . • Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant Page 3 The proposed addition of 90 seats to the existing Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant will not have a significant impact upon the study intersections. The addition of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pacific Highway at SW 72nd Avenue /Fred Meyer entrance to the east has raised the issue of continued Signal Warrant(s) at the Act III Theater entrance. PM peak hour warrants would still be met due to the existing traffic flow from the Act III Theater exit. In conclusion, the proposed addition to the Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant does not significantly affect traffic operations at the study area intersections. The continued need for the traffic signal is evident from the magnitude of traffic exiting the Act III Theater. Attached are exhibits showing the assumed site traffic generation and assignment. Also included are the existing, existing plus site, and total traffic conditions which were analyzed, along with the PM peak hour Signal Warrant worksheets. Sincerely, KEECH ASSOCIATES,INC. Robert Ke c , P.E. Traffic Engineer P.E. #8822 Project #94.030 • • PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant (Existing) SITE USE: Quality Restaurant SITE SIZE: 3,354 Square Feet (1); 101 Seats UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 2.86 trips /Seat ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: 0.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 2.86 trips /Seat TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 289.0 trips /day(2) PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 8.2 % PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 23.Otrips/hour(3) PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.70 in /total PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 16.0 trips /hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 7.0 trips /hour (1) As provided by Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant. (2) ITE Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991, Land Use Code 831. (3) Based on PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic (4 -6 PM). The number of seats was used as the independent variable for trip generation. • • • PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant (Proposed) SITE USE: Quality Restaurant SITE SIZE: 4,819 Square Feet Addition; 191 Seats (1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 2.86 trips /Seat ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: 0.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 2.86 trips /Seat TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 546.0 trips /day(2) PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 8.2 % PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 44.Otrips/hour(3) PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.70 in /total PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 31.0 trips /hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 13.0 trips /hour (1) As provided by Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant. (2) ITE Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991, Land Use Code 831. (3) Based on PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic (4 -6 PM). The number of seats was used' as the independent variable for trip generation. Robert K ::C- ASSOCIATES I\C. INNip CONSULTI \G TRAFFIC ENG \EER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD, PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641-6333 NP .Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant -4 1 . 5 rTF 74..ij4FI e.,_ ss/ mi t N14 ,,V ill PiFitx- l/rveL. S i t e A ♦1Tf� Z , ._, ,. 4 ) 0 . ) r I DvT' r G � , ._, Al■ I . _ � lr i lk . T , . . 4, t ,t0P . Pa — -v 1 11 1 0 III - 3 ill D• n n m 11 CP � �0) • Robert KETCH ASSOCIATES INC. - CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENGII\EER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD,, PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641 -6333 ' � . , A Vazatlan Vexican Restaurant A z „ . 5 X IST7Q6 / 4,44}fr, G. Ft...esti ■I A, 1- FM Peme. hto wt. S t e 4 4 Z . , . 4 fr �� , .•0°° l' ,fr .. ... _ , Alt .' l' 'S°73 . , - -. .j ,5 " ..,i l e ?0°-\ c \G w�4ip3 D • ')0 m 0 N Robert KEEC- ASSOCIATES IBC CONSULTI \G TRAFFIC EN \EER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD, PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641 -6333 ' NP vlazatlan V exican Restaurant I _ z3� Eul5r.N t $ 1Tc` TiLAGF�C 1' -t?,� ' N14.` PAI Pe Merupt_ S ' ,_ e 4 • . 4 x_4,4_4 ■ "0 I „1 , .„"tb' ___ _„_,__,_ ---- it-54° ------k -4 r6” Pa ! w� 0 d N W „ ?--, D n n 1r 0 i0, Robert KEE,- ASSOCIATES ICI „,„„ CONSULTING TRAFFIC EN 1225 NW MURRAY 13LVD•, PORTLAND, OR 97229 (503) 641 -6333 vazatlan Mexican Restaurant ■ c,-, ; T 0711_ T' - Fyic I Phi P er4x. //Do At. S 1 --- e _rs. -+ • • . _ 0 4 pr,;' Ulf 4I _ _ - ' - _ ' 5rI`i l \G N\ 0\0\1\19- . 1111 N•30 1% ' a � , - cD c �, J -) i D• , 0 m .,0 • uiiN - - - r• . • I • . z I l i) ! .`' .. W tl:.!_.``.-Y.._ C2_23' \•:.; i '. ; ' , ::: ; ii ' i 0 g 28 ' ' - A.:" , Pound 7:0. 4 ,.4 . ..q 27 I:* i tz &I . 26 sw ak a BORDERS - el l,.. / - e.s . , '' • 4 SW LURADE 4?, . g • ,,,.: ..c SW : 2. 4 1 A . ,,._. . ,.....:.....•,.., . 910o 8800 .0 SW EIIIWOOD • S RAC • • SW vEpmi• ,!;,, .4. ... i$ t12 !" '. . , ........ sw r t • J 4 6," 6)10 0° • • 'cilia , aunt a A I " .01% 9 ta ' . •I ' . ' • 0 • e>" .; • . ‘1. .. ' .e.:CrT SW ,,,:, ' . c a" LEHMAN ' 4 !..- • 11 8. . .. I CRES ,,,,,..,.,-,,,b,._,.....92, LT c:, , J.. SW .-- HEHLOC ' • . ' ST > I. le - ', .. • • ••.- - CORRAL ST s...•11/1.' 7 ,. - • SW LANDAU ' . " glirtrC i r• s'"' a 30 .... ,.f _.H.4. s ;. VENT 1 ......sw -•_,. ,: ___ ,.,,,, ,... SY 63 . - ,..., '' . . i • ',.. SW :I'l ', • , 021 . t:b._ • , • , •,, . , , ST - t 4... 091wir p ,..ii;1 ,,Q , 4 .. .. ,. : :., .,. . \\\ ASHINGTP 1 NGT F, .90 :, ilIMI21.1 -7 nig : r " ....--":_s_. '..,`... A 4J r- • - ..1 / A ISM -a b. sv law, ..c •il -'•,' . z ..T. .,., 0 • a ,,.. ..-. 1 /0 8 sw p.m. I E ;w HAPLELEAF - r- ,.. -. •, lai - • " "I 1 .. 0 iii 2 r - NI' -.... , el . ' .' - '. ' 4E4 •-• •;47 r, i \ -, r e, . '1 , - 0 , - §w t, -- 'c • I. ST p 210 - '' 1 - ., •• - ' -• i‘k' • - ' I i••;*--. • .. ' • 35 g1 S HO L \ 5 -- - • ' ' ''' • 1 ,, sw'' . MA I • ti ,.... I • cn 'n c. X I t Q i E . - ;:,•.; , , .• . 3b OAK < ci'' I ---:: __Al..-.1..____c„0 , s l 5 - _ .---.. - 1 ,,,,,..- .0., s■ om I * *. cr , a. , • , .. , . A je „... /:; ,,,, ..._,-- ATOM SI ,,,.. ! HWY ;; - s - • " a - .44 • 4: 4SP. . 9i V ,TC:". Ki, 4. 9000 I SW P , `■.. ,e, .... , . • ' INE _ 1111512 .0 a , •• L ____I 7.---- Q3 .•....■ 'I., . • I /- I ,■. '5_4 I BUODIN Oti ST S g ram t • 0. , > • 8 4.j, 1/000 Pliiic4 a CENTER . g SW SP ' ItGAIO' 5 c .• , . - . i . ; ., , \ s, ..,, coRowo s- ,,, , 4). .. , w ,.. .. % 9. , A oN .. , • , sw smor .LN 'N .. ii . x i AlSOW C2 .',. ()A, =le x sw v uwA ST a ( ..r. i a sw at i § .. ----- s•, fy Sw THORN ST 1 11 re/0 ......4iiinirit... • ..., 1 ;-1 ;lit . ____...___ A -- ,. a , VEST/ ' Ili1911 l ' ' 'Sli ...Z AMIC .' 2§ RsAZAZTA C ST • 34 . . 117... I '''.'e ' AsW - I A LINGSTAF .,.; ., . I - - 31 --- ' 1111 P r ; • ....,00,111'-3T a- 46._!›._.:■ 121,2111111;1111 2 . „'.. caos...e , , • • • *-, ,,,.... - - .......- N . ST ■ WWII E ll . , ,. , , .4 • . :. ig ,,, .. 74ganctivila... ,„ ,.111 - DAK0TA. ... grominmrl Pr111,41 4j mini •s: ' "a. , 44 C2: ., ..," •'.-""' • ,:,•,1150 '.. • , i • • .....E . ., I.., • d' 171 • 3 14 l a uf '‘•••••''' .. .. ...Jilt. "ii0 :, • . ''' .. •i' P! %. ' .'' , •.'- '. r • ci. ''' ' ' 94- •• m ' I ' L' '''' IcE'Ti • r"10614 ••: . ' ' 1 •:: " 7 . • 1° ;3-4 ' : : - '. 1 • V ; ' 7 " r . - i • • SW 1 W 44: :'-....:'::::'' . 361 . :. .. . .../. ,..,,.; 1 1 1 , I 4LLAY :1 :,-,- rOt '•".' 1 4‘,".. ' lety,.... : g ..:... . ::,... ,.... , a .,- a ..: ■•• i......... .0" ,,' . ,:..,,,.., , ,,: • '-' , • :••• , .e 4. 1 al ' .,• 4 ..L... . 7.1 . 4.'",747 C '''...‘ 49... a • ••• . SW • a • •as T 1 • ' ''..; :'• s ' - - t: i ,, • :i \\\ ,,\& '.' 1, 7,... • a ." .. AT IRA 1/1' I SW HAINES RI, ...i': '''''' '' EGE ' ' Ur ' - 2 ::''' . • '...*0: ...ii :I '' % ''' ..:1/4 `. ' i• • • .' : • • .- . . • ie .. •,g, ' . , sw 1.. Eli IS li 0 . 0 A. -: MARC \ . • s D v ,,t,cJI'', , ;" ' '.0 .. ' ' ' : ..' ...5 III 1 . eil 6000 _ _ - '2 , A .. 1 . `',.'1,i , ' ' .? _;:," I lk . i lk i ' V ..1 0 V BAY 1 . i :;,-..0 4 7 i , • Et ..,,,:. qk sP LN TANc.c sT A , iiii , , \N,,..--, , i SW DUVL - 7000 8 II 1,, P ' ' SE • DR ' ' .. • . • w r ' ' .0 • SW IS 1 if G . RD. AL . .. - -. 41 SW 17. 'd SY 0, TANGEtfr. "g ir , . 'A.'''. . ..111111 :, : .. SA 'ag '.' -' •.° ';'' • . • .. • • • ST ' C i.• ..,„ ) .44v, SC 'VI ''''' N\ : ''.. SW CLINT° ril,. I I A '' • ' - 3 • a A Nx. .!, • ,......,,,.,..,;:,,, ,,.....,,.. RINE . ..., . • . , T , . . . „ T .. 131 .... E. • , DU '....., , g .64 Liam • • 1,5-KATHERIN • :" ' -ST- '.:.• , ., ' I S .. c 1111 44 2 ..... ' ( .1. 1 / 4 °I A . 47.. ' - 5 - ' nie-.- - - - _ -SW i 1 14.- 4 $ ' 0 0: -1 .. . .,. . : 41 1 1 .. . -INZe4 , , 111111316113 : .- ' temie110 'ON • - a , ,, -......... - . .. - • cl5v* - .....--- - .. - ' 1 . -..... e...:Ii• ', 1 ' f e t , it y..,....1„1_„10.1-!-.. . . :IA. 7 , '• ' • • . , ,., "v1111 V um st. c ' 4.. lig 'Ace - A . . • x A sw . \ - - 1 . . 1 , 11 .. 0 4 '"1 CLYDESDALE • ..,:•.' I ...PK .....7 ',.t ' - -'41 ',.c - :A9,:11111 '. SW • G U • it i .... . c: 7 * 4 : .: ,.• ,, ts..h...i . 4 := .: .': , s,e.,.....,.::‘. . -"T. • T 4 . .... yr.. ,,.. .,.• rs... ai l- .. R T S I. . ■M ‘ / ......., . \, " 1 : 1 ; 0 -001 , .. /* A e:1-P- s °I?' • 9:1,...., HSW E1440S0 wy ; ° i ll crceil of 3 , ..,,,•': cr.•?.. %; • -0 , 1•.... - 1 •• „,,,, a E z . lo.00 r ; •• 47 0 , . sw : EVELAND S \ 1- SW IFE r “, 1 3 5 1 V %OA • F . A . A •'"' JACK 7-: ' . ' 7 " • •-• 'T ' . - l!ill li l'• 3 6 F •,;,'„,.„ ''• • 4 . ? • < . d 7 • 2 SW ERROL ST 4 .,, . . , • ' ,T). t/ „ C 1IC,h, 0: , , 1‘ . ' . •1' '"' ' • ' .6. .. ,,,...,, ,.., ,,„„, .i>. .4,.. . . .. ,. • '.• A :..2 sw GONtAGA KS cT..; • ...• • '••" c•:.':', • . 4; -.:•: 4 41 ,-..-..,....„. a, i ,... -,-„,,,-, . OR W.•• WALNUT ' %-.-' rm . sw a / . , ........0 i 1 .„,, .. :!4• i ' , :,... 41 ., **:■': . .. \ ' ' SEE 'W. H3 , , 'T ' .^ .,, \:\ ' ,,,.. f.:: . '. ! ALBE Ili! I; 04 ,- , , ,...., 2. c - ' •' , 0: . " .' Sl ‘ d TT : ** - .'•'. 1, •','.• v:. .1.mf.....- i , .i.s. 6011I CIR ,. I • I .' ` tY ,,•. ‘.. , '..,,,',"•:- 4 HMi , I i ::. . , :• / ; . ....1 :.;;:••••, •i S W .. RTA ST •-• ." a JP,' J '' `S 5 .. 4 / . 14764 .1 .; PI. 1 .." ' '' : k S .. h .I.r i CI it '''.. ., •,,,..0.0,. ' ?t, ' FONNER ST C. ' 4 ' 4 './.I'''': l','„.: ....,.,..,::.,..;::! .:1 . 1';..1.`,..,-. ..,.. 4 ..•,:, i„ .... , ,.... bo ,..' ', kk•,- • .. IRVING i i sei!,i,17. ,, • , ,, f imi:.'.".',. _ :II ,ir,... iii : ..f74..c.•,,... ...S T• -. , ?•ATOR■ •• •,,...,;•• • • ' '..1- •,,,,' • .:'' le' NAV ' A, ' ' ....6 '• • 7 . ..., . . 4 :. • '', ,, . : .• • usrvia II' 7s11/4 1 - ' 6' „. ' .„,, , • ilistimila - ,i, -, -mi lop -- :,..... ...:::-. .., 1 _,_,....... 4 . ....: soi ... v Ill IIIII4 i! >-. :.,0.. 2 :Art , HGT? , C ; T i..: • - r... 1.. (iii.it. :sr ..,,, , 8 ,3,` SW MARION ST : .. - sa ... • . -4C 1 1 CY / ' 'tRUs e ,c_st` i'''.\ 4.4 1 cl. 4 / q : '.,„i . , ,, • s ''.. rAti. ' ' -- . . .. 11:! .sw .. s F T i , R a . : . tr2 ' ' .. .o. : ' 2, i .. : 41 4 : . p vri ( F2 .. N ‘, . i x Cfr . , , V pi ' - ,0 09 4 "' . v - ' ' . ' - -N. ' A 4 4. J> f • 4a ST A 1 I ' • A - - •.,. II.: ' /...• :,-. sw C; 1 X $ , l' .. <••■ 'S. • '-' FA WAVER • gt, ' " 1111 Ilk ;* ''‘ . 4 ' ....'.. • .. ::-.. '':.1 I ' AS,, 404 4 lio _,,„1.. SW EOGEW000 ST 11 • ) %- es 1 43 DR SAt .. - ' . ., • 11 4 < ST N'iA) 0 . RIA 11 an e e. as• :: . ..:: '.."...'..:....... 1 s ' . '," FA., !„,.. :. ,...,,.. ' al • R i m , ROSE . 1 . ,,k‘',. . ul sw • .. • SF e ••:' • :14 i .• "".„... 4 := e's 3 - . 1.•• : HISLWI.VIEW 9000 1 -, • . 1. ' ..,...;.,:".'.;', .... .._ _ VISTA , . ' ' "^:-1., . v,matafra • "1-:., , /iv, ... 3 HI LV • ST 1 '..,..,,,. PL11.4•10111 8 i sv 1 ' SW • T H CENTER .• . : . . • ::,:.:•.:, •..: • ST 1.: •• T'.... ' '-',±.-;• ' : : i • di "• AIMIN . r' MEM : ..:J. ... i'L ktt qiiir4 FS . II 1 ..: 01 :: - - • • : a t .....•:,cE.N ,, ' • •: .1111.■In.'".°1 ' • -TA MCDONALD c ' . .1.6 - . _pa . . .. .. . . ,I, .. • . a • . -'. 1.: , . - r - -....,.:...: ...;.., sw in= E lifligljahmrAgtg G4 . 11 M 1111 . . - ____Iori. 9700 1...1 I■rarmi 1, - , , . _: ■ , „ . RI , i r,, , .... ..... D ..,....<.....:•._,..,,,••....,...:...:. .Vd •• DIU, 7. S I DI IQ UCH ST • ., SW ELROSE CT I it . ri 141 R14110 t• . LH [II i SU ', : ii % I I • • •• 1 : I. •••-. ,s •.•,4 . , r 4 - 1 a s - :••: zi. • • :•4` i ‘ . •.'"-,- . . 4 ' .) %I •., ... ,; _ _ _ _ _ - I 1._, V, WOO ' •: -.1.t. - - . • • At • . •• ' . • :AZ,'" / ' ..,:il' A l",, j' -.4 • : '' . • % s MOUNTAIN VIEW '. 8 Lglath., 'tee.' , -• • .e,.. .. • ...c '1' • - - :7- :;....a. . 1".. I SW lAN ' ' .: :11 • '' S ••.•:.'" / • •'• ''' .''' . ',.1 .",• . • ' . ' • • • , A IK,24 - a` : •• 4..3 ..,....••.:. -1,-,,,-, -.- - ---- s_ - '• Li.:!..,- . i...iii -vf. ',•,-,.,.•'' P'•,f ••.6:•a ''...;....." ,/,,- . ,„15 ..- '....... En arr. w ig MA' . - • ' ' ' • BON TA. ' RD A illi t ! .. .1 . 3 __----, 3 I:SEP.,/ , 1 X I , .- A : ', ',...; -• .•••••, w • Ifd. ii Ro . / l e, , P:x . ,!.ti r ifr ... •...., .'..?, , • . .- Nun 7 6°°° --,>,, L A N G I Car 7 L t N i b 5°X 4. ' . - • A 7.1.1L - ' • ' s I 10 i no. I 07 0p ..,,.' CCM 11 KU'DOC ''' El p 11 e I- , ST I .... sv .4.1 '! , a PaIRIOrAl •• t sh , a .w P. r ...K ,E . ,...... ... IL V : sd;i1c6cacsi I 10 0,14 10000 ca z . ■ . A .' .,* cs, t.SPER RI s •'. 4 .. .. 4% ,. .... 1 , i l7 . Ell! 19kALTN cr „ i : ..... 111 :: :KET :O NT..soN. : a ; paiti;:.. , .: : .. : SW I I, MON E OR T. SW LESLIE CI SW t .r, sT i LA t. CT , ,.„, _ . 1 SHAKESPEARE RD , s r tiP':-1 . 'i ' •----- 6000 __.„ DIN .. L ... , .. ,sie: a,' - :s . , - , - . C. • i SW ROSS 4 ._.. ,„ s , > r, c & I ' ; ': *I* ,::_! MU SATTLER .. cl 2 3 S 1 e 4/, t f, VI ' '''' ' • tr No . i,,,„ ,,t. ff, R < - .., is .1 •:..i.P,4%: ..-- v. N.o..•. IV Y . , . ERFIELO . . .. 'Pe, s , • ' ' , . i , .• ,... . St GOL , f2COONTRY , ' ' g t ,:: "- SAI - S c rSE '- RE 1:LD I Swl .. • I ail iiil - • . REDWO IN ,, • PI sw : ' i .1 ') c4 - 1 KABLE rg 7171A5- . _ ,, ne I As 9 por ... A ...:.‘::•. '' R . _ si o se.. .. 0 • co v4 s.* DR *:, e., td > , sv A _ sw IP1 • • • LN ,HARR i ' ' a • q s. • . „,.,■ c !I :-.'. , v - Nr.0-5( -§, - -1 ...: \. .‘.. ,.., . . , , - -, c , ---, - , i),.., .. ,=! f MA pPiql 4 • . • • .... • .. ,, . - A a 1 - rµcii -74E Ic / r FIGURE 4-6. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT --Pin PE4-/. . (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) I CL S I 2 OR MORE LANES Et 2 OR MORE LANES = 400 1— U w O 2 OR MORE LANES Et 1 LANE 300 I I °- , 1 LANE Et1LANE CC Li j 200 J E- MON 0 100 _a• * i t i -19 s E 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 '1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH *NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. P /fIGNw/ly 97' %.)1,6 /J IrNDLL .K 1 T FIGURE 4-6. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT - P h. -z 4, ,,,,_ (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) I a 1 I 400 f2 OR MORE RE LA £t l 2 OR I MORE LANES NES • I I Li.' Q 2 OR MORE LANES £t 1 LANE � � 300 • � n- � Q , 1 LANE Et 1 LANE z LL, 200 p 100 - ilibbk.-_,.....,: 5 tfiip I w = 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL QF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH "NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. StMMARY OF CAPACITY ANItYSIS MAZATLAN MEXICAN RESTAURANT - TIGARD Intersection Existing Existing Total + Site Traffic LOS LOS LOS Pacific Highway at Act Ill Theater Access (signal control) PM Peak Hour C C C Pacific Highway at Jug Handle Entrance (no control) PM Peak Hour D D D Mazatlan Restaurant Driveway (stop sign control) (1) PM Peak Hour A A -- LOS = Level of Service (See Level of Service Criteria) (1) The level of service, for stop sign controlled intersections, is calculated for each stop or yielding movement. Generally, the side street left turn movement has the poorest LOS as illustrated in the Summary of Capacity Analysis. This LOS may be experienced by only a few vehicles (those making the left turn), whereas the average LOS of all vehicles entering the intersection would be much better. • 4 -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 9/ 8/1994 8:54:34 INTERSECTION: TIGARD, PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT III THEATRE ENTRANCE VOLUMES: EXISTING WEEKDAY, 1994, PM METRO SIZE: 500,000_ ANALYST: DAVE CRAM FILE NAME: !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G =111 Y= 9 i ! i ! � i ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * *:r * * * * ** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 70% * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * i ! ! ! ! ! i * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! 1 ! LR. 12.0 RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! 2 ! L.. 12.0 ... .0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R .! L T .R ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 82 0 27 109 ! 45% 0% 45% ! A ... A ! NORTH ! 6 34 11 51 ! 43% 43% 43% ! A A A ! WEST ! 0,, 1534 87 1621 !• 0% 58% 13% ! ... B A ! EAST ! 0 1873 0 1873 ! 0% 70% 0% ! C ... ! APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! 1 ! 1 S ! 5.0 %! -! S ! -- ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! W ! 5.0 %! 1 W ! -- ! !E /W -NO SEPARATE TURN PHASE (C -1)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- ! ! ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LTR ! .000 .028 .000 .000 TR . ! .000 - .025 .450 .000 ! LT ! .000 .022 .000 .000 LR ! .030 .000. .000 .000 R ! .015 .006 .048 .000 ! T ! .000 .019 - .426 .520 L ! .026 :003 .000 .000 ! N -S V/C =.100 E -W V/C =.520 TOTAL AMBER =.075 MINIMUM V/C =.050 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L- T R ! ! 1 ! 1 SOUTH ! 262 1 SOUTH ! 8.9 .0 8.9 ! * ** * ** 0 ! NORTH ! 59 ! NORTH ! 8.9 8.9 8.9 ! 0 79 0 ! WEST ! . 4078 ! WEST .0 93.1 93.1 ! 0 303 0 .! EAST ! 3911 ! EAST ! .0 93.1 .0 0 350 0 ! * ** = CALCULATE MANUALLY Z • • -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 9/ 8/1994 8:56:13 INTERSECTION: TIGARD, PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT III THEATRE ENTRANCE VOLUMES: EXISTING + SITE, 1994, PM METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: DAVE CRAM FILE NAME: MAZATLAN !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G =111 Y= 9 I I i 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1 I I 1 1 1 ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 70% * 1 I I 1 1 ! 1 * * • 1 1 1 1 ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! 1 ! LR. 12.0 RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! 2 ! L.. 12.0 ... .0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R! L T R! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 82 0 27 109 ! 45% 0% 45% ! A ... A ! NORTH ! 8 34 15 57 ! 47% 47% 47% ! A A A ! WEST ! 0 1534 87 1621 ! 0% 58 % 13% ! ... B A ! EAST ! 0 1873 0 1873 ! 0% 70% 0% ! ... C ... ! APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! I ! 1 ! 1 ! S 1 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -NO SEPARATE TURN PHASE (C -1)! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST 1 LTR ! •..000 .032 .000 .000 ! TR ! .000 .027 .450 .000 LT ! .000 .023 .000 .000 LR ! .030 .000 .000 .000 R ! .015 .008 .048 .000 ! T ! .000 .019 .426 .520 L ! .026 .005 .000 .000 ! N -S V/C =.100 E -W V/C =.520 TOTAL AMBER =.075 MINIMUM V/C =.050 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R !. t 1 1 ! 1 SOUTH ! 262 ! SOUTH ! 8.9 .0 8.9 ! * ** * ** 0 ! NORTH ! 65 ! NORTH ! 8.9 8.9 8.9 ! 0 88 0 WEST ! 4082 ! WEST ! .0 93.1 93.1.! 0 303 0 ! EAST ! 3913 ! EAST ! .0 93.1 .0 ! 0 350 0 . O * ** = CALCULATE MANUALLY • • -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 9/ 8/1994 8:57:14 INTERSECTION: TIGARD, PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT III THEATRE ENTRANCE VOLUMES: TOTAL TRAFFIC, 1994, PM METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: DAVE CRAM FILE NAME: MAZATLAN !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G =111 Y= 9 I ! ! ! * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * *t. ** * ** i ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 70% * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! 1 ! LR. 12.0 RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! 2 ! L.. 12.0 ... .0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R L T R! i ! i ! SOUTH ! 82 0 27 109 ! 45% 0% 45% ! A ... A ! NORTH ! '8 34 15 57 ! 47% 47% 47% ! A A A ! WEST ! 0 1539 87 1626 ! 0% 58% 13% ! ... B A ! EAST . 0 1878 0 1878 ! 0% 70% 0% ! ... C ... ! APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0%! ! S ! -- ! ! ". N ! 5.0 %! ! N .' -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -NO SEPARATE TURN PHASE (C -1)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- ! ! ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST LTR. ! .000 .032 .000 .000 TR ! .000 .027 .452 .000 LT ! .000 .023 .000 .000 LR ! .030 .000 .000 .000 R ! .015 .008 .048 .000 T ! .000 .019 .428 .522 L ! .026 .005 .000 .000 ! N -S V/C =.100 E -W V/C =.522 TOTAL AMBER =.075 MINIMUM V/C =.050 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! .L T R ! L T R ! ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 262 ! SOUTH ! 8.9 .0 8.9 ! * ** * ** 0 ! NORTH ! 65 ! NORTH ! 8.9 8.9 8.9 ! 0 88 0 ! WEST ! 4084 ! WEST ! .0 93.1 93.1 ! 0 303 0 ! EAST ! 3915 ! EAST ! .0 93.1 .0 ! 0 350 0 ! * ** = CALCULATE MANUALLY • • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY @ JUG HANDLE ENTRANCE - -x D x Jug Handle E Date of Count: Existing x x Day of Week: Weekday x x Time of Day: PM Peak xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 4 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%:B 0%:D 0% Pacific Highway SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none APPROACH »»>>>A« «« < »»»>D « « «<> » » »C « « « < > »»> >B <« «« MOVEMENT AL • AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 10 1557 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1873 50 -PCH 11 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR =BT= 1442.25 CAPACITY 182 CRITICAL GAP= 5.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 182 CAPACITY USED= 6.04% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS =D) 11 • • LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of. PCH • i UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY o JUG HANDLE ENTRANCE X D x Jug Handle E Date of Count: Existing - Site Day o Week: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak XXXX __ x::x_;XX XNNXXXXXXXXX Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 4 A APPROACH GRADES: Xit_ XXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX A 0%:B 0% : D 0% Pacific Highway SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none APPROACH >>> > > > >A< < <<<< <>> >>>> >D <<< <<< < >> > > > > >C << < << <<> >>>> >>B< < < << << MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 19 1559 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1873 55 • PCH 21 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR ±BT= 1446.75 CAPACITY 181 CRITICAL GAP= 5.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 181 CAPACITY USED= 11.5% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .92 DEMAND (LOS=D) 21 • • • LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume ec;uals0.75 of PCH • • • • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY @ JUG HANDLE ENTRANCE x D x Jug Handle E Date of Count: Total Traffic =; Dav of Week: Weekday Time of Day: PM Peak = �_XXXXXXX .i`� XXXXx1YZx Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 4 A APPROACH GRADES: 11.»x1YxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXxx A 0%:B 0%:D 0% Pacific Highway SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none APPROACH > > > >>> >A < < << < < <>>> >>>> D<<<<<< < >> >>>> >C< < < << < <> >>> >>>3< < <<<<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 19 1564 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1878 56 PCH 21 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BRTBT= 1450.5 CAPACITY on CRITICAL GAP= 5.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 180 CAPACITY USED= 11.67% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .92 DEMAND (LOS =D) • LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH • • • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT 3 THEATRE ENTRANCE x D x MAZATLAN RES Date of Count: EXISTING Day of Week: WEEKDAY x Time of Dav PM PEAK xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 20 B # of lanes on major street: 1 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx_xxx A 0%:B 0%:D 2% ACT 3 ENTRANCE SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: APPROACH >>>>>>> A««<<<>»» »D < < <<< < <>>> »»C« «< <<>>>>> >>B< <<<< << MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 47 16 PCH 10 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR =BT= 55 CAPACITY 1145 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1145 CAPACITY USED= .87% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS =A) 10 CAPACITY OF SHARED LANES FOR APPROACH D 0 DEMAND (LOS =E) 0 LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY 'ORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT 3 THEATRE ENTRANCE x D x MAZATLAN RES Date of Count: EXISTING _ SITE x x Day of Week: WEEKDAY x x Time of Day: PM PEAK • xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 20 B # of lanes on major street: 1 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%:B 0%:D 2% ACT 3 ENTRANCE SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: APPROACH >>>>>>> A<<<<<<<>>>>>>>D < <<< <<<> >> > >>>C<<<KK < < > >»»>B < ««<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 47 31 PCH 18 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .58R =BT= 62.5 CAPACITY 1138 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1138 CAPACITY USED= 1.58% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS=A) 18 CAPACITY OF SHARED LANES FOR APPROACH D 0 DEMAND (LOS =E) 0 LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH • • • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT 3 THEATRE ENTRANCE x D x MAZATLAN RES Date of Count: TOTAL TRAFFIC x Day of Week: WEEKDAY x Time of Dav: PM PEAK xxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 20 B # of lanes on major street: I A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%:B 0%:D 2% ACT 3 ENTRANCE SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: APPROACH >>»»> A<<<<<«»>>>>> D«« < << >>> >> >>C< < < < < << >>>>> > >B <<< <<<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 47 31 PCH 18 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR =BT= 62.5 CAPACITY 1133 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1138 CAPACITY USED= 1.58% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS =A) 18 CAPACITY OF SHARED LANES FOR APPROACH D 0 DEMAND (LOS =E) 0 LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH • RECEIVED PLANNING Cg©Zff1r MC UOCDal J UL 141 OC�]C�o 1994 7/12/94 Planning Division City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or 97223 Re: Affidavit of Posting Notice As Required Prior to Site Development Review Application Expansion and Upgrade of Existing Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant 16169 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, Or 97223 Sign 2' by 3' posted today. Posting affidavit copy attached per instructions to provide affidavit to Planning Dept with in 7 days of posting. Original posting affidavit will be provided with Site Development Review Application per Land Use Notification Process Instructions. Thank you. /'Q n A- Don B Hennig 503 - 228 -3413 FAX # 228 -2770 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE, SUITE 202 0 PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 �/ ' • • Name of applicant ROSS C: u_ C S7gU C i ld .4 t ' C . Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # I S (3 Co C) i3 T L, O O so 0 Address or General Location t ( 1 'P 1 C W PA t Ft (4 w-% i I G1 A-nf0, n 2 g 1-Z2-3 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I, 00''1 tcht- ' C , do affirm that I re esent the initiating interest iin a proposed ( Pr ) party n9 P Po sed I? (2o J e "r- affecting the land located at 1I 6 Sk.1 Phc c F-t c 1lCi , O fL , and did on the C 2 4..1 day of , 19 g 4 - personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a S cre D V m. t44 ( E V t us application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal_ The sign was posted at 1 ((Pi 9 S t p c tow L x t S'►'� �C r` tie i zy (state location on property) This 1 Z day of Ls i , 19 96- /)fq Signature Subscribed and sworn to, affirmed, before me this 1 2 T=r day of U , 19 q y Notary u for the State o o regon My Commission Expires: y% /96 Rgr OFFICIA L SEAL E T V JONES �\� NOT.ARYPUBLIC•ORGON ' C0MM S5tON 140.014 L. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR. 21, 1996 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd_ Tigard, OR 97223 bgu^vo%vosmoccit (�at Tto Air ,S Rr I 1 Z we o t• • x ' 3 ` rein- nv' a I th 4- MEETiNG NOT /CE Russell Construction Inc., agent for property owner, is proposing expansion and improvements to the Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, the applicants would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: WEDNESDAY JULY 27, 1994 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BLVD. TIGARD, OR 97223 Please note that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the city. 3 • 1 i (� /� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: 01111 t 1�a SP,u1�Piraf 4 je ii. J DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sectibn 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: n1 r . Alm 1 1 iqq4 n/ By Name of Person Commenting: '" p 0 &0 W'&• 0 _ Ao Phone Number: 44 /92,/ • ED • RECEIV AUG 2 3 1994 TIGARD // REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ENGINEERING TO: ('k1/ttiriJ L DATE: August 22, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94- 0022 /PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PDR 94- 0001 TOTONCHY LOCATION: 10930 SW Gaarde Street (WCTM 2S1 10AA, tax lot 2200). To build one two -story building with 11 apartment units, one rental office, and a storage area. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.54, 18.80, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: R -12 (PD) (Residential, 12 units /acre, Planned Development) The R -12 zoning district permits a range of single - family and multiple - family residential uses developed at up to 12 dwelling units per acre. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Sep. 2, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: O EV ELOPEi∎ T Pskov <<JE. TtZEN CH C( c_ N ck cr O CITE S 6PCr.(F((4 77O k Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: - 10 -5943 RECEIVED • All - - -b RECEIVED AUG 1 1 1994 AUG 171994 _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A � RE RETEST FOR COMMENTS TO : U/ Gl7C (1/1 V e( �"' ( � 1 DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: ,Z_V Phone Number: 6, / s 7/ • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS (al /Or � �- TO: �c�V �k ' • DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • 'X We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Wton.0' mfl%p Phone Number: ( 420 — 5943 Y ' „14 � 1A,, � A, _ • • F-io 7l" �/ II ,, '' REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: a W . DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. ., Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. / /Written Comments: p_e_d--.- 0 4, /,,/,;‘,-„,),,, ‘,,,,,-, / '.4 , ' — ' ' -,/ - ''jr ,1 , ` f ` 1, , a At1, �� j I 4/1M1 ' / / Name of Person Commenting: /� Gi / v Phone Number: 335-'-- • • Atilro REQ UEST FOR COMMENTS TO: I DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: I ' - III 411 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: 1---Are l tAir l c DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written Comments: I) 1-1 yr2vi- .41" 3 t .!) , 1 1 er c m 1 .1.At - A T f a ,a ,e /Z G� ✓ r5 CI v) e7,43)-3 =7-1_ .S', ,o a a(4-L t✓i L lam tJ r c- L- J A c�r - Itz fl- J r rte,..,.., .- . Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: 2. C , "l (7 P.„.9 I F --- ( 9-1 ' 1 - - 4 ' j 1-*L14 -9 16 _ s 0 .0W Tz 6 /4 v` z-- f I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO : �(� I ' CA, 2Q,1� DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. � [ Please refer to the enclosed letter. � Written Co ents: k Ze_...Cie-vt, - �� G ��; f 4 SQL �v�, �/ • V 4( 4 / if Name of Person Commenting: A Phone Number: / P / ! / do .9 0 . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: )j DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0018 MAZATLAN EXPANSION LOCATION: 11619 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36DB, tax lot 500). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow expansion of the existing Mazatlan restaurant from 3,354 square feet to 4,819 square feet (1,464 square foot addition), remodeling of the interior and exterior, as well as parking and landscape changes. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. / Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: • Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: { is : • -_4,4, - .. t � KEY NOTES '_ PROJE INF _ <: ` �►`, A 1 K PMNT Y "` v NEW 4 PERFERATED FQOT{NG DRAIN- IN; GRAVEL / PROPOSED DE VELO E SURFACE WA T E R MANAGEMENT ! , r �ACE� ASPHALTIC PAVING - EXISTING / FQN �'" SITE DATA ; s -N "FRENCH GRAIN' CONIC' w / SOLID PIPE TO STORM: DRAIN � � LEGAL DESCRIPTION SE 1/4 SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1S, PROPOSED USE RESTAURANT EXISTING PAVING + ARE 26, 906 s q.fk, NEW 2" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVING AT LOCATION OF RANGE 1W, W -M., TAX LOT 500 EXISTING' FIRE HYDRANT s PROPOSED PAVING +ROOF 2 4,589 sq.ft. YV M BL E 4 ACP EXISTING WHICH IS TO BE REMOVED DOWN O BASE - ® WASHINGTON COUNTY 777 BUILDING AREA 4,819 sq.ft. (1,465 sq.ft. PROPOSED ADDITION) _ <' , ROCK' - BASE TO BE RESHAPED AND COMPACTED AS = - � REQUIDRED TO DRAINAGE CONFIGURATION ® GARDEN WALL 4' - 6" HIGH` WITH WOOD TRELLIS STRUCTURE — NEW ADDRESS 11619 PACIFIC HIGHWAY PROPOSED PARKING e- ( ACX ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVING - EXISTING TO BE REMOVED 433, TIGARD, OREGON PAVED AREA 19,770 sq PARKING REQUIRED — 1 SPACE PER 50 sq.ft, DINING,. AREA PO LAND. OREGON { r ( - LOT LIGHT ON PO .E - EXISTING TO" REMAI IN PLACE . �. LOT AREA 30,568 sq. LANDSCAPED AREA 5,979 sq.ft. = 19.6: (2,556 sq,ft 49,1.2 Q' �` � - f SPACE PER TWO EMPLOYEES (6) 3.00 O - <AP ACCESSIBLE PARKING ACCESS AISLE - 6'x 19 LANDSC ED AREA - EXISTING 7 NEW / OR REMODELED - SEE LAND- MM R IAL I 'P O � , j �° A> . C Yrr SCAPE N , ZONING C - G GENERAL CO E C DEVELOPMENT NOTES TflTAI RE QU IRED 52.12 �! ACCESIBLE PARKING STALL - 9'x 19' WITH STANDARD SIGN y cz` OF 0\'` , j � . EXISTING DEVELOPMENT 1_ U ARE EXISTING IN PLACE AND NOT REQUIRED TO BE PARKING PROPOSED - REGULAR SPACES (MIN. 8' -8''x 18') - -- 30 �► il- C LEARLY VISIBLE TO A PERSON PARKING iN THE SPACE AND <LSO> LANDSCAPING BEHIND GARDEN WALL - TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER CHANGED OR RELOCATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL - WHEELCHAIR ACCESSABLE (M N 9'x 19') - 3 ;.: • <APS> MARKED WITH THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY INDICATING THAT THE SPACES ARE RESERVED FOR PERSONS EXISTING USE RESTAURANT - COMPACT - 15 ) 21 (39%) <PSE) EXISTING POLE SIGN TO REMAIN IN PLACE PACT (MIN 8' 0" x ' r 0" WITH DISABLED PERSON PARKING PERMITS; AND BE DESIGNED 1 BUILDING AREA 3,354 sq. 2- ONLY EXISTING OFF -SITE NOISE SOURCE IS PACIFIC HIGHWAY TRAFFIC TOTAL P ROPOSED ° ' S4 9t '� _ TO STANDARDS ADOPTED BY THE OREGON TRANSPORTATION SLOPE NEW A.C. PAVING TO DRAIN - NOTE: SLOPE A.0 FROM TOP OF 3- TH ARE NO TREES EXISTING ON THE SITE WITH MORE O __, COMMISSION -VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL SHALL BE DESIGNATED <SAC) SIDEWALK CURB ±1/2"1 AT ACCESSABLE PARKING SPACES AND AISLES PAVED AREA 23,552 sq,ft• THAN 10" TRUNK DIAMETER AT A POINT 48" ABOVE THE ` c 30 AUGUST 1994 AS SUCH AT A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1:50 - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OTHER EXISTING TREES 's f. L AREA 3,662 sq.fi. = 12.09 : I 9� I <APV� ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING ACCESS AISLE - 8'x 19' ® EXISTING STORM SEWER LINE iN STREET rON�TRUCT10N EROSION CONTROL i <BBE> EXISTING BILLBOARD SIGN - CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL FROM ; NEW STORM DRAIN LINE TO STORM SEWER - SIZE, SLOPE, LOCATION AND <SRN> BICYCLE RACK - NEW - MIN CAPACITY (4)- BIKES 40 POINT OF TAP -IN SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR . THE SITE DURING ANY EXCAVATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOR THE MOST ECOMOMICAL INSTALLATION TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF INSTALLATION OF STRAW BALES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE AT THE <CBE� CATCH BASIN - EXISTING AT STREET THE CITY OF TIGARD SOUTH PROPERTY LINE DURRING CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING ADDITIONS ' SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN ON SHEET "LS" CBN CATCH BASIN -- NEW 5Q A i ® PARKING LOT STRIPING NEW "CHAIN- LINK" FENCE AND GATE - EXISTING - INSTALL NEW <CLF> ® SIDEWALK - EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN BUILDING ON SIGHT OBSCURING SLATS ADJACENT \ �® ap N ` PROPERTY w - ); - . DOA TRASH DUMPSTER / DELIVERY AREA (EXIST. CONC. SLAB) <SWN> SIDEWALK - NEW 4 CONCRETE \ i �� W © DRIVEWAY APPROACH - NEW - TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN SWS STREET SIDEWALK - NE WIDE CONFORMING TO SPECIFICATIONS OF - ® / \ ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS \ / THE CITY OF TIGARD - AND /OR THE STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION P OF THE STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION ACCESSIBLE ROUTE DRIVEWAY DETAILS - OPTI " A" " - SEE SHEET #C -1 SIDEWALK - EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED • f p I _ ::(15 # FIRE SYSTEM AT _Y *, ADJACENT PROP , r EX TRUDED CONCRETE CURB - EXISTING - s-_----. d ` ::- , - - , . <WME> EXISTING WATER METER '= ADJUST HEIGHT TO NEW SIDEWALK AS REQ. POST INDICATOR CO Z Z • . � EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB - NEW VALVE C SIAMESE PUMPER EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB - EXISTING TO REMOVED EXISTING PAVED DRIVES /PARKING CONN. �g S TR ON ADJACENT PROPERTY 044 * `‘.• • i , 2 - ® EXISTING ON ADJACENT PROPERTY - GAS VALVE �.�\ 2 O �� 1 ' ' ' : - ,1 7 ....,______ _ ____ ...._._.__, \ „ .. , . ,. . , ,________. /7-- Oa 2 �- ^. ECX � v 00' i 6 Ot ` W 225 � � - o — � -� //f. • ►_ , i \ \' \ ' .--- , S - v a+ 1-; � N me ta 0 . ' II" r— o' rEg , \ \ \ ._ ® ® 1 ` \ \ Jil 1 NO it) , ®� 1 ECN ;n J ; C' "to l - In , f `pis" � , Wit a i tt / s I EC N \ c(./1 ® y 1 in' - i ') t , , , , .0 - A - ur ACX /11 , � p \ ( COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT CGMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT CO PACT 2 -I • ;1; , I-- ■ H r '-'\.,,,,, . ., - 1 1 c'A = I / 1 �Z - Q i>v 40 5 AT 8 -8" 43 " -4" (4)- AT 8,-0" 32' -0" 23' -4" / CBN J v M.H. �,� r , I 19.59 a T 8 - (5)- A' = ' (4)- AT 8' -8" = 34' -8" (4)- AT 8' -O "1= 32` -0" \ O / i ' © O / � < . / RI = 240.5' ,N t i f Ur S � - p \ i i (MIN) ~ TN : r te " --� . ^--°- . / ___� Q l \ ` - Z * U CB _ ...___-/ 7 cs. 1 (9 Z F- w 11 - V / ! 0 ' ' / , ( i i Mr , -,- - ..„ - - . .-,- / I Z / 42 4 /lea° , , t SYE O T HERS Q� i �'� _ y = . £ _... 4,4, , __ 4 - - 1 __ _ ~ -- -,., - 2 G 19 __ �- , .- 2 8 - - . - 4,4,4,4, . , , . _. �. � - _ ., , ,. = ..r 15 / AD z F -- - _ 3 <<� I t i$ i �: _ _ - - r`°'� :_ _ i 0 = � j - — � / _ EX S- ING TRAFFIC C - � � r « ISLAND :. CURB FACE 44, r _ r ff , tg. r 8 x - il J A tit -,„, ', ise d AM ID MI El -' 4!) IIP ECE I rgrAer#1741PA \ ;n . t \ , \ 4 LS Y 0 ( 0 ® , SWN \ G FRONTAGE f : 4 3) - . ' AP'A EXIST \ \ i 1 as IGN . -.. _ A . 1 < �� .�� - .- �f .- I ,` - - - - - _ � ' � �♦ � � � �' 4,i ♦� ®��s��♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ �� ♦�♦ 114► �� i�� \ LS \ I 1 I ` \ 0 (0) -� �, N o �� 1�� r � ♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦�s� ♦�� A DDITION j �j�j�j�j�� ►��i�l�♦��'� ---- \ . . �r � � ♦ ♦ ♦Oc`�: ♦ ♦ :y ?C! ♦ . `♦ _ : "W 1 4/ ♦s� ♦ s�e es ♦ V I I ( \ \ \ E 7I AI?S APS t<`? f -� - < Fr; I ��i�i►� ♦ � ' ►,►� .��i�.lu ��% ��i►�� i� �� ,��,� ,�� i a. . i. -a, .- - -- - \ \ _ _ , , M EC .„ r SIGN Ar ito. : � i , � s s� ► ♦ s s s�� s �_ _ a I • ,,\ ,_____ _ . \ \ \ ',, C CV -,- t 5' 4 3 , N� ��► ' �I � ♦ ♦ ADDITION i \ _ - ,\ \ ` w r 1 ireprzor p F r 95' -2" ► ♦� ♦w ♦� ♦� ♦� ♦� ♦� LSO `, \ \ I\ s o` v v \ ( _ -- . (--) ,e I r Cr Ki),.., P 1 u " 1 S :♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦, 1 \ \ ` CBE © \ O o - ♦ c� .►�, ♦� ♦�� ♦� N / �� o. \ 4ID C .3 p ACX m ' ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ♦�� -. ! o0 U a I ►- cu e 1 i N N in ,• . EXTEND , . ,__-,,- 1 \ , \ \ ADJA��N T PROPERTY a ma ►�►� ► ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ _ C 3 , I . OD y ' a :4,i " ' _ - - - _F _ _ _ - _ , t3 a ♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ , _ T \ - BBE � / . • ... ... . . ...... .......... ♦si`�i ♦isisis ♦i r ly_ i s ..4,..44..4.......•... !- I ` I D •14� 4, � 4, 4,•�. 44.4,�.� . 444. 4,.44,4.4,44,4,4,.4,4,4,••4. ► Q O O e T� p s DOA � — `J -I3 ECE i a �� 25 Ai ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦` - =; • < > 1 __ _ s \ Is 5 $_ - a� e _ r x: — O U -- / / / / / /I�� _ _ - -' — - - _ - v i 4 , -, , __ - - _ - -- _ ---- DESIGNATED- RECYCLING _ _ _ __ ,_ ;_ — -- ___ __ _ t"`, tl�J -- -' - __ -- - - _ -- -- _ - _ _ _ — ta•M AREA _,,, I , ....... _ .._.....„.. _ , _ __ _ ,_, - • S 0 0 . 16' 01' W 283.54' 0 �' �'� 2 APPROXIMATE EXISTING 44` 34' -8" 16` -6" 8' 40' - ; -• GRADES AT EXISTING CLF y < EXIST / EXIST ADDITION �RP(� ... .. , . _,� = GRAPHIC SURVEY BY I PAVING - FROM TOPO- I i SwN � ©NCIITI00A1.L A+•' PR4V I ! - ,, C . _ . SITE . PLAN ��n�r Ai� ' AF P� : rva ° • .Ac :s CENTERLINE CONCEPST, I STANDARD INC, DATED 2/07/94 P SCALE 1" = 10' - 0'' 1 • _OMISSIONS OR L 4 1z --,- t9' -0" AT ACCESS AISLE ACCESSIBLE , • f PARKING - - lifr F 1 J2" MAX STEP SIGN NOTE EXIS GA S, WATER, SEWER / i V � / AT FLUSH CURB - NOR TH BUILDING ON __, AND ELECTRICAL UTILITY HOOK -UPS k It r„ 4- tSkT EXIST/NEW ADJACENT _'�� { f en:•< . $ SIDEWALK PROPERTY ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AT EXISTING ' ;.; •; :, - “. i-`,' u ;' -- _ � ' - 50 SIDEWALK LOCATIONS ON SITE AND AT BUILDING `'” '''t' A.C. PAVING i I ---- - UTILITIES ARE CONNECTED AT PACIFIC @-%;.. - i - ,_ x HIGHWAY R GHT - OF - WAY i REVISED 27 OC ER 19 r� 1 TOB 94 � - , , 1 - 4 MAX. SLOPE s I CL i _ AT ACCESS : 1 { i RE VISE D 16 JANUARY 1995 AISLE "A\ ACCESS AISLE SECTION SP SCALE: 1" = t0' -0" , d ' i f .,„ , _., ,,:14_,, ,- : -....:,4, - _ f" -4'. 4 , _ - ' , : ' _ . I ' . - Wi t. �r _._ -.�,.� __ .. _. I z — — T — — — -, _ _ -. --._ - -- - - - ' - - - ci ,KEY NOTES z 3 . M RQJ CT INFORMATION . i A— -, , . • - LEGAL DESCRIPTION SE I/4 _SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP IS, ACE ASPHALTIC PAVING - EXISTING ECN EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB - NEW ‘ Lf Iii 1 RANGE 1,'V, •�N.M., TAX LOT 500 IX1-1" [ WASHINGTON COUNTY ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVING - EXISTING TO BE REMOVED C EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB - EXISTING TO BE REMOVED = � A ' "� ? � ,x ;- A � � _ : ,� � C ` � �T � ADDR TIGARD aCRIFElGONIGHWAY - S 19 G GARDEN WALL 4 6 HIGH MATH WOOD TRELLIS STRUCTURE NEW ACCESSABLE PARKING ACCESS ISLE x - ■ LOT AREA 30 sq'ft' +•. C -G GENERAL COMMERCIAL APS ACCESSABLE PARKING STALL. - 3'x 18 WITH STANDARD SIGN LOT LIGHT ON POLE - EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE , #� 1 M f�T�l - ZONING ACCESSABLE VAN PARKING `ACCESS ISLE - ;3'x 19' Ls LANDSCAPED AREA - EXISTING / NEW / OR REMODELED - SEE LAND - . + /!fi � r 1 :� � t EXISTING EVEI OPMENI , y � r S CALE PLAN • r iL i y �' i� � ♦� ; EXISTING USE RES I �: D EXISTING BILLBOARD SIGN ' * is ' • 4LSO> LANDSCAPING BEHIND GARDEN WALL - TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER ,, , � i � BUILDING A REA 3.354 sq•ft gRN BICYCLE RACK - NEW - MIN. CAPACITY (4)- BIKES ��# - — ` � PSE EXISTING POLE SIGN TO REMAIN IN PLACE > a NM ttyy - ii o nuns ■so ; ./ PAV ED A REA 23,552 sq•ft. far CATCH BASIN - EXISTING AT STREET e� . I 1 <sTN) PARKING LOT STRIPING - NEW �� ■ ��.� i � �`■ ! _ LANDSCAPED AREA 3,662 sq•ft. = 12.0% p a CO$N CATCH BASIN -NEw S IS B WE SIDEWALX - EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN al� &IIlII1♦ If lh l l, � 1 °111 4 " CHAIN -LINK - EXISTING - INSTALL NEW �� ` t P ROPOSED D EYELOPMF24T GATE G ■ a e r � ii 1 FENCE AND .. ■ ��.1e�. �� d \ SIGHT OBSCURING SLATS SCE SIDEWALK - NEW 4 CONCRETE .. � "` a MP .. gylll,;.!1iiiil PROPOSED USE RESTAURANT TRASH Tf £Q CON DUMt~sTCRETE ER j DCURD ELIVERY AR>= EXISA TING3 (EXIST. CONC. SLAB) STREET SIDEWALK -NEw 5' WIDE CONFORMING TO SPECIFICATIONS OF " 1 ad I lri ililkci �� BUILDING AREA 4,819 s ft. (1,465 s ft. PROPOSED ADDITION) DRIVEWAY APPROACH -NEW - TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE CITY OF TIGARD AND /OR THE STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION 14� x O�1.11111111 p� W PAVED AREA 18.860 sq.ft ACCORDANCE MTH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS <SWXX> SIDEWALK - EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED /ornz �1 ��1111;1111 OF I#IE CJTY OF TIGARD AND /OR THE STATE HIGHWAY DIV.. 111111 iliiiiiiiira ` n . > - ' f. LANDSCAPED AREA • 6.889 sq.ft = 22.5 i I1ii i .i . i IIiEi Iii ~ DEVELOPMENT t)TE$ { • LX I ` 1- ALL UTILITIES ARE EXISTING IN PLACE ANO NOT REQUIRED TO BE /a1 . i CHANGED OR RELOCATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL ' ms s ��■ . .• - � � � � • :R � ° - �"� 2- ONLY EXISTING OFF -SITE NOISE SOURCE IS PACIFIC HIGHWAY TRAFFIC � z '!" ° 4 - _ l 3- THERE ARE N4 TREES EXISTING ON THE SdTE WtTN FORE t - lea d .2I THAN la" TRUNK DIAMETER AT A POINT 48" ABOVE THE ., I £ NO SCALE SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OTHER EXISTING TREES qi • - UC ION _, CONTROL„ CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL FROM BUILDING ON THE SITE DURING ANY EXCAVATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE • ADJACENT INSTALLATION OF STRAW BALES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE AT THE , • PROPERTY SOUTH PROPERTY UNE DURRING CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING ADDITIONS M • SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT • \\ EXISTING PAVING + ROOF AREA 26,906 sq.ft P (ii ROPOSED PAVING + ROOF 23,679 sq.ft. ' • \ PROPOSED PARKING. C \ PARKING REQUIRED - 1 SPACE PER 50 sq.ft. DINING AREA g . \ CBE\ (2,556 sq.ft.) 49.12 'IX 0 - 1 SPACE PER TWO EMPLOYEES (6) 3.00 ) � � ,.,. TOTAL REQUIRED 52.12 v i . k" E �`' S` 00' 16' 01" W 225.93', \ PARKING PROPOSED - REGULAR SPACES (MIN. 8' --8 "x 18') -- 37'∎ $ a WHEELCHAIR ACCESSABLE (MIN 9'x 19') 3 j L' -•-�-~ • \� a , ---t \` `, -- - - -- 1` `i — COMPACT (MIN. 8=-0" x 15' -0 ") 12 (23%) � 6 _ r r F' — =- _ m _ — '.`- 1 !" � T OTAL PROPOSED 5 _. .. VC 0 } LS �► t rac c ot�kt ' ca r�c . � ` ' ' - , . 1 • 2259' F , . ( A7. $' 40' (6)-AT $ -8" 5L' . I Ai 6'4' ( AT $' -a" = 77' -4" ' ' \ j %' \ , % % '" \ • < . \\ o ', - i) • 15' 3' 24' ' 18' 7' -8 "* . Z4' /(77 19' • • "� 5' -8" ' EXIST. ' 16' -s" $' • ' i '• :\ .' • I 1 1 Tom► o • L • ' I . ' - • `t - \ � � 'Y . Cy • BUILDING ON � ' . � f • ' ' 7 ,'7 i 1 ' f ;� r ii t 1 � AI ,IA NT : � .� A -. PROPERTY ' . � 'y - d . 7 I i ` , 9 I ,, I L.LE : • 1 ' S = ► t *�iss�••asi iris si i�i•i�i • +s+ . I RS S S�s + si + +'�� +ire + °�s�ss�i�is�s + a L S , P Ott 0 I •�� . _ _• + t► • • •�• ♦ • 44 1•• • •,�• • ,, : • „• • •, *, • ♦ •,• a ar .•.�•f� ete ate es t� cte e••� t "\ •r • CO 1 , ' i 's +►si►sst►••i +is•�ss gf, s 4 95a�• * • +•�• «• * s� g e s: s: ►,•�• + • +l . _ \ . \ � �iy 0 all fi <. ► F ! r ► / ►s +►;s�•tsss� \ t - s /R*i //1 �f is - +is••••♦ .� t • Nov ►•s+s••s•' ._ \ .• m=a X ` '� I 1,/ t - : of .� �! / //. � # + ► � s �� *• + � - ' ' . V. 0 Ifi • '} 1 i .+� +�s ► ►is�► _ .. .; ►< \ • • , • `a pp Arl /// ;•= *s -• +.s , • to / • 04: :: ., : ;; _ .-: t • ! : J ! SN I - t . ' rACE -, • 7 1 1 G R STA - : 1 ► 4' ► - .. \ y 10 Q W ig s N N � i'1� • : \ • • . ►•��►•�s�• +s�•i I i \ • LSN t ,. ` • • 20 I cp „, ,i : ; � • t : - 1 \\ ' , , i a ~ i x • • ‘,..... ..‘"-- A.,,,_,ii. C gj I g; i .- .•. � r ..► r - r r 24 - . • . � -...; w+ t%4 - i , a `R'� j i� ;;,4'1 r + n 1 '1r -Ir ® W=2 in, • • APPROXIMATE EXISTING I ! CLF EXIST -' ,.,1 , 4 3 8” ADDITION - Jo MADE$ AT EXISTING 1 1 . • PAVING - FROM TOPO- -- --r- -� -- GRAPHIC SURVEY BY . NOTE EXISTING GAS, WATER, SEWER \ 4:5 CENTERUNE CONOEPST, AND ELECTRICAL UTILITY HOOK -UPS DATED ATI=Q 2 j07j94 I 1 I ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AT EXISTING \ N. - LOCATIONS ON SITE AND AT BUILDING - UTILITIES ARE CONNECTED AT PAL"FIC HIGHWAY RIgiT -- -WAY • I ADJACt:NT n 1 t I PROPERTY 4 I mili I Ti 9 * SITE DEVELOPMENT AND INFORMATION FLAN _ • Vti I PROPERTY i ? SCALE: 1 = 20' -O' I H NORTH 1 ( _ ___ „ „ , , . _ _ _ ,. , _ KEY NOTES, }Ifir - -- . . LOcAll9Ft .M PROJECT iNFORMATION ..- " , c �, EXTRUDED VAN PARKING ACCESS ISLE - • i - SITE DATA 48g AC ASPHALTIC PAVING - EXISTING �� ,j t l� LEGA DESCRIPTION SE 1 4 SECTION 36. T ECN EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB - NEW 1 - . , LOT P is. 50 u Q ra virtu si � ( ,n f ikl A RANGE 1w, ;V.M., TAX LOT Soo a► F lgo X ASPHALTIC CgNGRETE PAVING - EXI9TiNG TO BE REMOVED �CX EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB - EXISTING TO BE REMOVED r : �- Mr " WASHINGTON (XXINTY C M f r ADDRESS 11619 PACIFIC HIGHWAY : CAA) ACCESSABLE PARKING ACCESS ISLE - 6'x 19' <GW GARDEN WALL - 4' - HIGH iMTH WOOD TRELLIS STRUCTURE - NEW �' i1 TIGARD, OREGON < .Elaa APS ACCESSABLE PARKING STALL - 9'x 19' WITH STANDARD SIGN LL WITH I~} LOT LIGHT ON POLE - EXi5 )< k 1.1 ZONING C -G GENERAL CO LOT AREA 30,568 sq,ft TING TO REMAIN_ iN PLACE ,� luum ' E MMERCIAL It: ( 8'x 19' LANDSCAPED AREA - EXISTING / NEW / OR REMODELED - SEE LAND- ; E �� d r41 IP . :zCG _ OBE) EXISTING BILLBOARD SIGN EX ! $TING USE RESTAURANT 8T> CAPACITY (4) BIKES BEHIND GARDEN WALL - TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER a AP CI �� ..�� ,- ' BU AREA 3,354 sq.ft . iiii PSE EXISTING POLE SIGN TO REMAIN IN PLACE Ul � , i� PAVED AREA 23,552 sq. CB E CATCH BASIN - EXISTING AT STREET I . i /iirniuiiii/ - o • ( " "! PARKING LOT STRIPING - NEW ' CBN CATCH BASIN NEW iiiaiii. /u�'i!■ LANDSCAPED AREA sq.ft. • SWE SIDEWALK - EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN 3,662 sq ft• = 12.0% 'fit;![ /�� CIHAiN - LINK FENCE AND GATE - EXISTING - INSTALL NEW 1110111111111111111111 '� - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT coil f SIGHT OBSCURING SLATS (S1Md} SIDEWALK - NEW 4" CONCRETE i �rl` �ti�lll + ii�l �t � TRASH DU / DELIVERY AREA (EXIST. CONC. SiAB _ : n'j t 'f !!r!litutV ! ..• 44 PROPOSED USE RESTAURANT NM S >s STREET SIDEWALK NEW 5' WIDE CONFORMING TO SPECIFICATIONS OF ! i IT n - r ., - , THE CITY OF TIGARD AND /OR THE STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION 11 i• §. t '�� DR r�allir�n • '% DRIVEWAY APPROACH -- NEW - TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ■ r % MflAilil�! BUILDING AREA 4,819 sq.ft. (1.465 sq.ft. PROPOSED ADDITION) < ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ` SIDEWALK - EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE R EMOV ED I r* 4 PAVED A REA 18 s .ft OF THE CITY OF TIGARD ANDS OR THE STATE HIGHWAY DIV. Kiliii ii t ,ss q ! lililil.. - LANDSCAPED AREA 6,889 sq.ft. = 22,5% E� UDED CONCRETE CURB - EXISTING _ . . . OR 5 hail I " J lil /a1r � i ° DEVELQPM�IT NQ • C ,. 0 : " 1 - ALL UT ILITIES ARE EXISTING IN PLACE AND NOT REQUIRED TO BE . ,_,, ,,, - . - ',,,, - +�_ .....§............. t CHANGED OR RELOCATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL 4. 1 :ii r M ` S L ' 2- O NLY EXISTING OFF -SITE NOISE SOURCE IS PACIFIC .. • • .7,1l -I Fl HIGHWAY TRAFFIC 1 �! t Ilt'in,ll■ I>tt -- 1 � 3- THERE ARE NO TREES EXISTING ON THE SITE WITH MORE ' 4 0 - ,,,- THAN 10 TRUNK DIAMETER AT A POINT 48" ABOVE THE I NO SCALE SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OTHER EXISTING TREES - (0 CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTRA., CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL FROM BUILDING ON - THE SITE DURING ANY EXCAVATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE ADJACENT INSTALLATION OF STRAW BALES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE AT THE PROPERTY SOUTH PROPERTY LINE DURRING CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING ADDITIONS \ SURFACE WATERgAEMEN7 J \ EXISTING PAVING + ROOF AREA 26,906 sq.ft al } PROPOSED PAVING + ROOF 23,679 sq.ft. \ PROPOSED PARKING - \ PARKING REQUIRED - 1 SPACE PER 50 sq.ft DINING AREA ,PC, I g CBE_ (2.556 sq.ft.) 49.12 r l.__.Y�_ _. _ _ ___. \ -- , fb 0 ACX - 1 SPACE PER TWO EMPLOYEES (6) 3.00 X� .L + - �� 52.12 _ _ '� a r. TOTAL REQUIRED r — _ _- --� _•-- .- - - - `� S 00. 1 6' 4t "_ W 225.93'_ (-- - \ ' i � -�\ _ - - -� : - - r - <SWS� �: PARKING PROPOSED - REGULAR SPACES (MiN. 8' -8' 18') - -- 37 - -- I -Z-----1. - r' — �4NEELCHAJR ACCESSABLE (MIN 9'x 19') - 3 - ` � 6 . . - COMPACT (MIN, 8' -0" x 15' -0 ") 12 (23`) tP. ACX • i ECtd , - EC N q6-5i> TOTA PROPOSED 2 1�J 5 I COMPACT co►wacT' COMPACT COMPACT cow A<ACX> 13 / . ' a , \ \ `� $ v 1- c ' • • 2259' -' 1 / : \ \ c ( 5)- AT Er = 40' ( - AT 8 -8 = 52 . 8'4 {9)- AT .8' -8 = 77' -4" ,. CBN \ti ; itv 4 .q srn - STN \ DwA -.A . \ 0 . - 15' )/ 24 18' 7' - $"t ' - 0 " E • 18 ' Z 8 _ • 5��8 _ 8• 70XIST, _ • 18' -6" Er A - \e IX @ E ir I / - • /; � ECE ECN t° _ - ' _ G�- C LS f ' /t .� 1 : !�t, ! - '• - \ V AC — h '� - � i , Elj'; . : � 001 1' \ � `�` 1 L L E • _ I I .12 . + ig . ► ;ss r '. ;' t ` .\ J' `o i� - ♦ . ••:• ► 1 , �� 9 � h! I - ►ii� i i i'! 1' ii ' i i.. .. {l � i � iiii l �`i'i'!li� i , 1 -. \\ 0 .1 iaa ►► . 1 sssiss►voiisiiiQ `+ + 2. (� *' . •\ - �f► $Q i 4 i ►iitii��ii + �ssha�s r is�: = sssa sis► � �YiYr J ACE a s + ♦ ►+ � •s s # sus ?i iti * i s m t s s s s a *? ► i!i °iti a tiii s a ' i it* +yai - •- •- �iisiiiss siisii'r i - - \ l� .�� ► "s`a i � * fi r ` ifil _ !i • ' / r ii�►1i'irs*i'ti� ° \ ' .. \ \ *. 0 '-' X s i i�p * \ f 7 f. Xi (0 *' 15 % , ,ii • 4014, ► •j�►ii ° \ \. \ A p .�� /! ► i = ' iv .• i . • LSO \ \: t�? • • • __ ECN ►isssssa• 1 • t ii iiiis \ �� 1 5 G R STA . r rf � \ \ CE ,. �' �' •, r ►; 0 2.4 f S TN i ' Q ►sis ^s�.i� " to so, 1 : i th---. ..- • ..;f1 0X i�isi�i♦ s ; ••••••••4 • i \-4E). x • I - - , O a DD , i •••••••f .., ' \ • 4.--:..7 •. ? +li♦ i _ r 2.447 i X111 w� y 2 • 2 2 �5' 44 S OW 16 , 2 1 .�- w..., ��\ . 24v u ...... _. _.. Z g9 _ l 1. 283.5 I C LF 44' 34' -8" 1$' -$" 8' 94_8" nr� APPROXIMATE EXISTING I - GRADES AT EXISTING 1 1 ; I PAVING - FROM TOPO- - \ GRAPHIC SURVEY BY NOTE: EXISTING GAS, WATER, SEWER; CENTERLINE CONCEPST, CEN DATED 2 NCEP I AND ELECTRICAL UTILITY HOOK-UPS \ 1 ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AT EXISTING \ J I I ` LOCATIONS ON SITE AND AT BUILDING \ ..qi — UTILITIES ARE CONNECTED AT PACIFIC \ " I HIGHWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY 1 ' ElJILDING ON ADJACE7`i7 • I J� PROPERTY �` / \ 4� P SITE DEVELOPMENT ` PROPERTY spf ELOPMENT AND INFORMATION PLAN ■> SCALE: 1" = 20' -0" 1 /gyp 1 J NORTH 1 i I .1 -- - - - — - — • • ' , _ i LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS ; 4 • 1 ,14 — — - - - cope: • Provide ail labor, materials equipment and related services necessary Ca 1 V / to furnish and install all landscaping indicated on the drawings or specified - i t--;.-1 herein. Landscape Contractor is responsible for final finish grading, soo ` 7._z--__ preparation for trees, shrubs and seeding, and planting of trees, shrubs and - seeding. •/-- Rough Grading: Final rough grades including the construction of berms will be I -- — J ,- established by the General Contractor (±3 inches finish grade). \ , -- - , Finish Grades: Finish grades will be established by the Landscape Contractor. Site Maintainence: During all landscape work; keep p avement , planters and buildings clean and unstained. Keep work areas in an orders condition. Remove " A m all litter and waste material from site. TREE GUYS (PAUL BROS. OR EQ.) INSTALLED PER — r�FGR's SPECS Warranty. Warrant all plant material after final acceptance for duration of one (1) z CROWN AI LT TOP ■ full year. Replace plant material of some size, condition and kind as specified - m r 2 x 2 x 8' min. STAKES in the plant schedule except replacements shall match caliper and /or height FINISH GRADE I attained by other plants of the original planting. MULCH kg TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH - N Topsoil: Provide topsoil which is clean, fertlal, natural loam oblained from a local / i�'.''``` •• well drained source free from debris, roots, stones, weed seeds, or other roots or - lir !' =�•/ '"' 0 ir�r�_ ,,,,, ,- '•'►•••. •.0.4►•►is.•►r_ grasses, or other foreign matter. NORTH * .x+*. ...*. - l l ► ►i� i�i�� ♦ I 1 I 1 " Mulching: Much shrub and groundcover planting beds with 2 inch layer (minimum) o II .��.�►� :4.'4 ► of medium bark mulch within two days after planting. Apply mulch evenly with (L SP LANDSCAPE PLAN ''cc t ... O . • (_ clean and consistent edges. SCALE: 1 • = 10'_0•• - - . _ `o j )7:111-111 l' t �- COMPACTED SOIL MIX Maintainence: Provide complete and appropriate mointainence of all planting areas (3 — EXIST.) -7____, � II fora period of sixty (60) days after planting or until final acceptance by General SUNBURST LOCUST E Contractor - whichever is longer. (4 ") i r 2x ROOTBALL DIAMETER , { 1 ExIST° ( 1 — EXIST.) SUNBURST LOCUST ACER PALMATUM 2 _ NEB A TREE PLANTING DTL (6'— 8' SUCKER GROWTH) 'RED LEAF' � ° 41kIjkal r (5 — 6') S UNBURST LOCUST SP SCALE: 1/2' = 1' — 0' (1 1/2" CAL) ilk A004. ANIL i !!Jt j 7\7______ _( 3 — RHO ND T) J ...._ — _ (3. _ _ . ,r,40•41 41".„. tigw.,.. ..... ..„, \ ; ___ ..._____,-....,,,,_, 'L. filli.. _ r ic o lm. sw ar4/___ • 1 - 0 .._ ..... •• •• .401.„......_....x., „ A iirrif Ill 111 t 44a------14114115416 IPAITIV,.. 0111b■Vai 'it _saPA 1111111■1 •..... Alreklifisslik_. • • 'WM p• IT ' ,..,/ Wrpt � ` ' '�'. i r ! �. +. ,.. _ • �•♦• •i ❖i • - \ �rw ; � fir l w as •. .�. • 4P,V 4 401001410 #► EXIST SMALL 1 � ; . 64 `,.�'' .. t� ' SHRUBBERY TO REMA! ;:tim . . f !♦ • �i � ` • ♦ • I a ill• p 4i ikbe ii di I ilk', Ark rz Irk � E XI,S�{ NG SMALL . .'i •, •.. • • • j SHRUBBERY TO REMAI • 6 3 —N E'JV i {2 —NEW} ►j•• O•� tiro ��/ ) AUSTRIAN P[NE �j t f �a�ar ammo.. OTTO LUKEN LAUREL _ /.0� ` d ,� - (1 - NEt SUNBURST LOCUST \ �, '/ .. GROUND C VE — R ±�� j ` (1 1/2" CAL) COVER \ t t BAR HARBOR JUNIPER \ 0 ��' �' (48" o/c E.W.) \ oc; 1 i.......wil > > (2 NEW li ,./ AUSTRIAN PINE '� i (5' — 6') 9G O 1 GROUND COVER BICYCLE PARKING MCA MINOR • \ GROUND COVER ti OVA ROCK BAR HARBOR JUNIPER . (24" o/c E.W.) GROUND COVER (36 — NEW) �y gif0 tf,�4 14 — N EW \ ��► �� (48' o% E.W.) .� a] 4I LX CRENATA - ■�-- . 11 e.: c \ - •� . ■rrrrr rrr� ♦ t EXIST ae. . ` ruffs .0 r`� 1 . 2 -GAL . ♦ s• • . S ilk .. ♦♦ ♦, ♦ ♦ ♦ `1 �� "ir:C.. - ! f l �• suNBURST LocusT {� ' I♦ ♦ ♦ i *t � 1li� + - . . 4LEx CTA . . S. 1 '! - - : 2 G • Vi" •' •• �• ' �� O (2 — EXIST) I. T -� - - - - - s' w � / +��`�1••il��'��i 1►r�� RH LO LIGHT a■. j! � tl�� 2 4 a . Z : ` • V i d -;i : � • •% \ 1�'i op4, , r - ♦ . I mp.. - l-r' ' • i � i l , mi,. • -: • ♦ � �.. ` 1. � : l OUR �r+ • _ a i ` `- :: % L* + s t ~ ∎ :• 41 4 - — _ � . £1! i UREL � ��. ►t ' � • � #44041 - �� r�- - ADDITION •• `s♦ � i � 1 I _____ J I 4, a f: ' � IAP .'.� __ i f 4 � i R' \ (1 1/2" CAL) J i ) 1 T) • ‘1,.. GROUND COVER 4 5E , (4' — 5 — NEW) ViNGA MINOR _ (2 ) (24" o/c E.W.) 1 . `► SU NBURST LOCUST a■a` R... , • GROUND COVER t (i 1 CAL) i l `� VINGA MINOR 00‘, i % `- : / - _ u i� ' ��►� \ (24" o/c E° w.) NIA. �'il' � a � 7 ±i �i � � —' _ ■ I,. is �� . � Y c l�. �lr � ! — _ 6.ti 6 49 . � t� TRANSPLANT (3)— �. ♦ _ aaa ■ ��' �ii i"" � ■ XIST: RHDOD i • r ' ' — ...: i / �� FROM ADDI END AR EA IN � Y Gal i ADDITIO - - i ■�-�"` / 24 • ' — 40" / 4 _ � ' ' � a` ?t1STiNG RESTAURANT BUILDING a a ■[.■rs■ a �,��} t ( ) E - EXIST. 1 _ It =, TRELUSEO GARDEN VIII M uGO PINE � �� AREA TO 8 ii sera .i%' 41 al! )� a i cia�� ii aia ►li (4 — S ) i i 1 F , ; i ,' ( 7t — NEW PLANTED BY _ = ii „ilk ARBROVITA .,„4/// _ _ IMAM E .T ii� `i■ i ` !tip t ip: ` { lk AR O NEEDED 41 a . i l a , TO FILL —IN WHERE EXISTING ARBORBVITAE _ �'tiihli.l .i ilif r idiot* \ N . MISSING AND FORM HEDGE — 12' —18' HIGH — 'S■` , �. I ft �� SIGHT OBSCURING TO REMAIN PRUNE AND —AP_ =. � i TINUOUS HEDGE CULTIVATE — ADD TYP. ��e■r�ii - CON ' ► BARK MULCH o ... " :4 1 7.4 �� eNwies■ si lr ► z 4aa i! . 114P/ • . - ' _ - - _ t.._ - _ .rte_ s - + - .. _ / — ' !! .i „ , V /� EXIST. 18 " - 22" POPLAR IV !.!� / . r,, ,..•Nest a ..��a �a ....r. m.� -E rr . _ ,.. _ i, -.►+� ta�� O 0 O 0 O �.�i�i [ar .te s� T • All dot r i t / e ?" ��' r -r !S` :iia. — �,■�_ ,►� + _ __ :rl� # rir " IN R.O.W. � i ! h i j ,, i t {, � { i t t' 1 ! 1. rob amp I� EXISTING PLANTING TO REMAIN 0 !y% EXISTING CHAIN —LINK FENCE AND GATE Y ^.. 1T _ 4' III i SIGHT OB URING SLATS TO BE INSTALLED fi" NORWAY MA PLE (EXIST) Is Proposed Addlfdon and _Remodel] of the c� Tr ° R3 a _ IMO {1 ma 2 0 G--- 3 in - y. St.11TE THE OREGON PIONEER BLDG. ��1( C�' ° c�{, tom T TH►EST STARK - re ��r } P s ANDS. �� s QN _ , (03) 228 -2866 87204 I \ * _ _ __ __, • F , r . _ _ 1 � , ' LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS x • • - , r -- Scope: Provide all materials equipment and related services necessary . . . v j to furnis h and ir#sta11, all landscaping indicated on the drawings or specified \ herein. Landscape Contractor is responsible for final finish grading, soH • preparation for trees, shrubs and seeding and `planting of trees, shrubs and . • �. _ 1101111 seeding. —.. - Rough Grading: Final rough grades including the construction of berms will be ` 1 „ 1.- established by the General Contractor (±3 inches finish grade). \ - -. \ _ Finish Grades: Finish grades will be established by the Landscape Contractor. 1 IN Site Maintainence: During all landscape work; keep pavements, planters and buildings clean and unstained. Keep work areas in an orderly condition. Remove ;11111111111111111.'"Illair litter nt and waste from s, T REE GUYS {PAUL BROS. OR EQ.) INSTALLED PER MFGR's sPECS. Warray. Warrant all p material lant ma #erial ite after final acceptance for duration of one (1) CROWN AT TOP of full year. Replace plant material of same size, condition and kind as specified r ROOTBALL 2 x 2 x 8' min. STAKES in the plant schedule except replacements shall match calliper and /or height In FINISH GRADE g attained by other plants of the original planting. ' MULCH 2 j TREE WRAP TO FIRST r z BRANCH Topsoil: Provide topsoil which is clean, fertial, natural loam obtained from a local c4 _ k t . .„, . well drained source free from debris, roots, stones, weed seeds, or other roots or ®''""`` ` temica � '��i��s , ' � ..m " .. r_____ii__.1_ r'"`"�"''""" " rasses, or other foreign n matter. NORTH __I u i � ' ' 4 : r 9 9 .. 0 — j ___ . i �i�i�i�i�: • 4i • 1 :::i: : I - Mulching: Mulch shrub and groundcover planting beds with 2 inch layer (minimum) a + 0 1 I +�► ♦�� V . A 1 with I .. �� ♦�� of medium bark mulch within two da Ys after P lantn 9 PP Y mulch event Y SP LANDSCAPE PLAN '' - :- .. !- 2. -.- •• :: � _ clean and consistant edges. S CALE: 1 = 10' -0" \ \ " Ito LS SCALE: _ j — Maintain ence: Provide complete and appropriate maintainence of all planting areas 2 J r I I I j 1 r 1 I i1 ;1 COMPACTED SOIL MIX fora period of sixty (60) days after planting or unt final acceptance by General (3 - EXIST.) Contractor - whichever is longer. SUNBURST LOCUST � 2 (4 ") - ] ROOTBALL DIAMETER ( 1 - EXIST.) ( 1 - EXIST.) A TREE PLANTING DTL. SUNBURST LOCUST ACER PALMATUM 4 SU -NEW) SP n (6'- 8' SUCKER T1 'RED F' N BURSCU Sp SCALE: 1/2 = 1 - 0 (5 , (1 1 CALLO ST �- 0 4. '1/4 n a1;�� ;i_ `. .. " _ _ .. ' i _ p.m � j . - - -- �. _ _ ► Hassel ,,. ►_I` `� _ • \*,:f#,,,v;A:r . ` , \ 1 iir irL r +•':ice+ \ *V* Ati r • • • • • . Pilq 40' ii* .411 1 , 11.411, 1 1-Ni ilk 1 i E Veil hip EXISTING SMALL • ♦ h N 4. • SHRUBBERY TO REM � � � �ti. O J + \ \ , _ \\ l i p . 1 i / EXISTING SMAL , "�,�•� „, .��,� �� — SHRUBBERY TO REMAIN (2 - N `, •.,, \j r ,. } ( 3 Err AUSTRIAN PIhE ��...�! \ • �� i� OTT" 18") LAUREL ' 5 . - 6') 1 -�,�. 1•"• tir�r arar (15 - 1 { ►� \ ( q ;» ; 1 , . t N NE LOCUST GROUND COVER �` ,. .r q (1 1 /2 CAL) (24 - NEW) s BAR HARBOR JUNIPER \ o (48" o/c E.W.) \ .: \ G� 1 _ NEW) 1 ►.. rt/ \ f AUSTRIAN - PINE A 9 ( f) �- ' a GROUND COVER \ GROUND COVER �, j�i''�> ' BICYCLE PARKING MCA MINOR GROUND COVER BAR HARBOR JUMPER _ NEW) ti 4- (24' ofc E.W.) . . NIPER -r •1 1 ILEX CRENATA ` 14 - NEW) LAVA ROCK , . '.I `. ` •� /' _ � _ - ) - a lik i lG i=1e 1111 .! aat�.raa� • - : ii�sa 4 i Neer :e •♦•\ 1 EXIST. 1 4 •f I (2-GAL) - 44 ' _ !._ ■E _s:n : .� E ♦t . - � ♦ -S ♦ , • • aver r�rn .r.�. ■ .r.� � �� I i MUGO PINE t i lb. 10 ( 1 — EXIST.) � �_ � . 1,.. ►iu:�'_1/ " . . �.E a Ery=artl'is.E / i $ • ♦ / .„,...:,- SUNBURST LOCUST LL a r" c 13 °' NEyV j ♦� • r 5'-6') // Allairillip.:, i 1 L Ex ArA ' ♦♦. • �. �. !) + i s a o. • + �. (2 - EXIST.) - - � � � � • �i • • �♦ �� jj!��//�'� sei� }��,� RHODODENDRON a•40. • ♦ .. o sue' N,4• \ • f % b 4 ' L"T LIGHT dik kl IF a ; " ' �� ' GROUND COR �_ ■. CK r - . U p p ]= j f - - � ` r• As 1 ADDITION •.4 .A • . 4: � i��I� 4 • i . V • � :. (i5 i8 �` ► ♦J• '� .i: :. . ef i I 1.. ••;* it ♦.•. 4 •�► ►'♦ `'� ! 2 - NE ORwAY 1 �)� ll► � jilt � rJ• • t � f it 1 " Tea " r. � �i • s ��1` n ■"�. (1 1 / 2 � 01tkKIR 1 l � i E`r'Z � 11111 lb ".r,c411111t -AL ` + (1 - EXIST.) t _ Di ller j1 s ._ . i �� \ MUGO PINE �> . F { 1 - EXIST. ' :r `s`.". �i�el ! ° f ( S�3 i r Mt • \ MUGHO PINE GROUND COVER r ' � 1►� (4 - 5 ) VINCA MI NOR r "� r, . \ ii. of / (2 — !I£W) (24" o/c E.W.) _ _�i.�E'i� GROUND COVER i UNBURSr LUST � ..■ 24 o c E.w. 1 1/2" CAL) _ �r� \ „,,,,e,, MINOR mit 7 e Mini i I ! R 1 .1 �, t+ j ,. tF - - - - _ _ - - - • - . -- - - - - - � E. i l.�. 4 � � I f •& 111 l = y ■ .E 1 t� TRANSPLAN? (3} = t. EXIST RHODODENDRONS .� � ► . •. FR ADOI TI ON AREA • Jr � E.Ei� E! 1 t - yc' - _ D t A ! ON 40 4 •.- TI 24 ,� F < ( f f i �a - ( . 4 - i ■ E F 1 - E E! � .E . , RESTAURANT BUILDING Ti �ST AN B N . "EX N ` R R -. IS G E A r. EE.rE.■lliE '�� EXIST.) �t E..i. �.;i T E: / '1 T } ' �EA a� 1~_ l (if 1 " - , l'1LI (7t - NEW ) ■ im k i �.ii ARBROVITAE ' al tali *1 r ii,... amoral ( O NEEDED * i w � I siL. TO FILL --IN WHERE EXISTING ARBORBVITAE ilrlir = 4 lligi t t Er ' +� tE E �EIE!'� . 1 F MISSING AND FORM HEDGE — i2' —18 HIGH e \ Al )000,4,41 TO REMAIN —PRUNE AND ' �� SIGHT OBSCURING = / \ / �" �� CONTI �UOUS HEDGE CULTIVATE — ADD TYP. �, � *044 BARK MULCH •� .r ■E • 41W -_-..- :.._= ...,,.: ' � _ =it 1 Ilk - - . - • r ,lit ti � ! � n » N. ; � i( �' ,ia'` �r , EXIST 18 -22 POPLAR - 1 . , = . , t IN R.O.W. r. .r _ _ t - a _+. .:.a t.��. ��a Lra - - � - c -- — - \ i - a I ` a :sr" ' i ce' S � ..�- *.-- _.�raiii►= .F,: - -•: �:• .. ► . • ,rill ��ra� WilkyOrim' „ s _ _ _ E X l5 T1NG PL ANT TO REt+�AIN . e s / s �iI , of �' ! ZF \ sI S _ --,. r r ! ! i Y- ►� � �l s '7� . / ��w►j .l itia ! _ "IF Imo` r ►'�. • ` Ste -� .. / - �r , - ' +� i + ►"�.+ 41 r * i toti �.� ' I 4.9414/0” .11• / !� • . � ' i ,/ • .r .rte .r W \' ► EXISTING CHAIN -LINK FENCE AND GATE SIGHT OBSCURING SLAT'S TO BE INSTALLED 6" NORWAY MAPLE Proposed Addlt on c Re oc c l of the . MI ai, ',.‘4 ei t 0 401. ir ENA e:' . X,. b (Si in] Li Ce) ta a, cut r oa. rti It a f ey in Ti rdI 9 0 r �' o n SUITE BOUT WE s TARK aT (644) 228 -28 97204 NW I/4 SE 1/4 SECTION 36 T I S R 1W WM. I S I 36 DB hV WASHINC N COUNTY OREGON 1 WORTH �L 4 E k1CnAk:.on (.LC 55 S ALE CI_ I O � SLUTH LIRE T ST - 5 - I P G SE E M ISI 3 ' - rr "AL P. 1N7 _ r �,a 7 4T ; •- — 58:a Ci ° E 816.7 1 — -- a -- _ _ L'FAI - =- I - - -- S88 ° 03'10 "E 302.12 0 5 4 (P `L 0 =- 1 7 9 2 I 12 11 14 '- 8 + CANCELLED TAX LOTS i k :u. IE��J 40 170 358 4 i I E COR G RICHARDSON a N r 101,300,400,100 AI,102, , 27Ac n , : : .29Ac 1` 11, \ DLC 65 s s o r t 1e Ji I I 1 6 `i ; J I"- Ji I I o \ G n I 3 i * I69 2 I \ 15 00 , i 1800 n �i�, \ r / m Iti Ac 11 29Ac r 0 - 5 i y � 7 r -- -- 1P 1 7 9 2 4101 1 \ s ° h 9 p i 14 0 0 1 1 1900 10.09Ac. ! , $3 0 \ P • n 26Ac � i0 .30AC. r i S8 19 E i 3� �; 587 \ , / ), / \ f � \ 0 -) /!' 4 x .°1 \ s s A / � 26 `� 2000 N \ s s9\ ye 2 p1 ti o� °� a im n Tr ,29 AC r \ I 1 s O ° / ty I r F� ,, 1 7 9 2 g4 6 9 2 \1, \ '',\ .cf° 120 e 0 2100 i ,;-,. w' .26Ac r 1 0 1 a 29Ac : 1 \ - p 6 'p 190 r to r '` � s -6, , g 08Ac \ 1 m \ \0 \ 26Ac 00 � i 2200 . 1692 n ( �` 1 1 °p�� ,1‘ \\ .�‘ 29 Ac. 0 v \ y 0 A (lA ` o I V 0 r / v #. 01 t...- S E COR 01 cI 1 � y6� // I� r J NELSON 332/129 I_ r , 1 N89 ° OC N �,, 4/).t.1-= 15B 6 6 __ - O 4- / 1 I6 S89 °00'E � 79 3 o m X� I I 1 -- - 1 92 0 z I 6 / IOFAc 44 Ac ( o tt , C O — 1 I // . 1 9 2 0 i S89 ° 00 • E • / Ai 50 006 / .4 // m % D OAc C S.13,968 r y a ° ° N 0 to SEE MAP NI N � A 1 s 1 36C A m See C.S.10679 ) 4 ,, \ O p 120 3 I "•0w $ X , , O f o: : . W ... c^ri iv 500 r y I / 160 I 500AI , 200\ 4 A \ F -900 I 35 ac I + 6' v l m :P4 c. 9 0 200M -I - ■ 0 1 � _ : m CS 10381 1 800 160 1 0 A a '^ y 0 4 "O �; o 2 4 A c m 1 n K, \10 A 00 i 6� W ( A D r *,) 'be `V �' t9 m ro ,.70 i , G \ 1 let `. 62Ac Q. O 700A1 I oo tii FOR ASSESSMENT o I 0 2 \ \ Y ,,tA 1 Ao E. PURPOSES ONLY } E I ,.. A .y6 1 6A °\ DO NOT RELY ON I 3 "yi y tr ' `' 6 FOR ANY OTHER USE ° 5 � _\ 2 ,-- .- SEE MAP 84 S89°0 0•E O 3 1 i, 2AA0 b � \A o ° N 5.07Ac. 600, 4 , c 0 O ei .. ISI36DA a 23 Ac t " °, - 3 6 _ 9 "4. = •xq' o x- , - • 0 _ ' ' O 260 \ /2 A• ‘-b y a \ A o l l7Ac. \ i v / 26Q s. \ z \ ./ - 871 • 34 Ac m M `� 7- 0 0\ I 1 ' ° ( °. \ yO �' 0 R O O z T:1 0 12 A \\ 2 0 , o t k. 44 1 CI 6" i. V \',`'' 00\ S ID C S 10413 ` =' i� 250 - �° 0 3 z el' ., ® U 4,_,---.. 30Ac p o * s. - gr ° 4 2500 - W ci I I • 4 /Ac. ° r o r = VW C S 10488 , ' 9 W ; o M O se 1 0 ~E N 40 M m m a g N O _ W _ 1 4 2 / 0 1 2400 — - 1 11 /4Ac N g Z / o 0 Al t11 \ 1 - t O / \ 09 02 - ce . • o / 13' / ...--' U I 0� EN S \ 0 m z W c0 / I r ,- O MO 00 6425 ,/ / 9 •� E fOR REMAINDER ^ 689°501 s O to I 1 - bF TAX -LOT t; J Z 1/ W 1`5 36 DC 2501 N X r 40 I O l I 69Ac t / a Al 0 1 It ij 81 A6 1 A P o 41 f 6\ :, %V I �d A I� D N Z .SO " ` • � ,/ SE ' - MAP 1 S 1 36 D ' / '' 1S• 36DC 9 A8 ° 30 E q � - I 1 144 - - - �f • •.►n� /r\ / L NE I /4SW 1/4 SECTION 36 T I S R I W W.M. ISI 36CA m WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON 0 w > II O SCALE I= I Q • 1••• > vi a • w .. .r__.wa. Q SEE MAF ti S p y „,„.„,...",...„/„.„,,,,,„,„,,„„ 7 0 CANCELLED TAX LOTS I ° ° / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / i/ ip/, % / / / / / / / /((// v „ 11 • ,,/, . t ', € , , ,,, , / // , / / / / / / / / / /// �L, . , S • . N �5 56 O E „ 734 66 1900, 3400,2600, 2200 ST PLUG, A 2 , 4200, 5200, 200, 300, 2004, 8 2 i i q� 45 29 85 85 85 71 �3 ry`�� 71 1 00 G 1 ' �` I O O O O 85 8540 2 °i �� O 0 Q 2005,701, 0,6400, 21 00 V — L _ = J 100 ® 6600,6700,6800, 4800, J � \ / � / r >�� 2008 R- 5600 5700 5800 5900 6000 R =16 w R ° 16 6900 7000 7100 3 J 2 /Ac N E COR 0 p U o o m J. SAX ° 5 36 Ac o 7 ° 6 - g 4 Q 3 2 -° 1 o 66/479 K �� j � N M TRACT LINE o m J R R LINE GEORGE . RICHARDSON D C 55 SOUTH E THOMA S70TT0 d O 87 O 8 5 8 61 p ^p j,; "gy #: N,O T M - 'A"0 85 85 8 5 D LC NO 53 n 1 T1 L • v 6 .. • 3 � : , fy . 0 l' c $� Y'` 8 74 67 O 89 83 97 10 � 80 20 86 124 67 0 w O 4594 a POINT 2207 2206 2205 N "2204 2000 w STORM DETENTION 8 ` I 1 r I— —1----- 289 • / n � r u) 2 /Ac. 0 0 p 6100 \Cli, I o I I o ,� STRAP IRON // � `” _ loo PARK ° I o v m ry° 1 ~ 1 o a f\ -4 8894 e'W 8 5500 N a N �m ory / I N =1 � _ 7 6 Z 5 Q 5; a3.06 0 z 9 10 11 1 01 1 12 1 ,p, / m m \ 1 h h R =25 I 1 9 / R z ' 6 ` �� - 0 w 1 4soo . 1 p � 2 203 1.I. 2007 a 8 t o a - I / 9 e. 70 89 37 07 • • g 6 . 38Ac ` 4 25 0 , X 00 9 ) V. 20 1 44 80 d 55 20 _ � 9c1'l F1J- o ''',...._ 61 b19 1 2/ N89�4�W � D . 3 o M b ;�:. ,: 10. 37,75 \ a as �a / N rn r ; P ` PT g � - 1 137 79 N T N 1 16 a 9s N v ' / 15 7J8 ,,, o , v , HORN STREET ,21. 2009 � c - — - w > — — 997/227 3 \ 5 s 4 • 37 W 8 �a TR B �' T R C co C R NO 2275 N w .36 Ac o " - ISLAND o /, � 6 0 r ISLAND Q 140 86 _ : 12537 + i c 2 20 g is r. . s 11 " — - �� i""' K, — O 0 I I E 96 — N 0 l fi ° 2208 p • R ) 2 N 137.79 . p N N �2 ° _ O 0 8 0 • n N 89 ° 56 0 N89 45' W 2006 99 E z6� �" � 0 13537 - 2 , S89 1 = 0 I 0 \ \ n w I r' r r \( / I m0 N 69 °43'W w 0 ° 0 I3S 37 N 2 4 AC. t`` Q ' ,, i;: ,/,..2iiii /i�`a — J � J �J J J N 0 0 1 1 Ti3 -t . S 16 d ° 2 209 m ° C 589°43.E 2003 I Z w � r I N re '5!3 E , : "13'7.79 . .. ^t °� J r � �124/� 1,.58..7 4 200 M p0•.. N 89 ° 16'58" w 600 r 77° 38E 47 00 N m - \ �� - 206 6 294 2 • N ` 13E j4 . N/ R = N o 0 0 1500 160 170.0 Q o _ 9 894c 5.81 Ac. I /.34 Ac 2300 0 \\ o1 1 400 0 w c I:, S.; 26° 4600 2002 13 6.37 ro 2400 t- " - r0 2 8 0 w X w 25 • 4500 m N W n w � N 89 49' E 2 0 500 ` C 2500 y p 206 , p 137.79 p °0 1505 h Q 3 N 7200 n z SEE MAP 1` r- S 1'29 3 1;,r, M ,� 88A 24 4400 0 137 , S • _ o , In IS 36DB - .— 0 — — — — •_'' on ° 7300 _ 1 r 0 C - z JJ -5 2i 7 1 3779 w m -- 0 /~ y 137 600 w t- n , , , _. N 89° 49 E 2 3 4300 49 00 n 0 SEE MAP 2700 n n ra - K3 (NJ n r• P 0 Y ISI36C6 F —I n o 5 °_ 4 M 6 •,,...,•,Jj7.A „ k v 2016 i 22 cc 4201 \< m.1 7 0 2 N 1504 �� n Ise 27 /8Ac. - 79.4c w 2800 n t S 89 ° r 5000 3 .-,,0 0'E C--) N a - WF WELLER _ N 101 0 — �S E. COR 1` 2 — — — 2 1n 132.69 0 w /16T -8. 184/261 o I } 21 4100 -- — — 1zs so _ N 1 to 2900 r 1_1_1 / , /FAIFVALE O 238 65 1 m • 7 co w 1 85 0 N WCOR J C MORRIS h / n 7 • •,n , ii' -;7UU ••z� ,,,, 0 p —I 5100 700 m "4---1.---- 281/469 . 294c. n N89°04 L0 4000 w , .34 Ac. 0 1800- 3000 = n 1 -i-+ p = 800 L— 1416 , - 7 44c LL] n Oy ti r o I•" 23Ac r ° FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 1- 8 (CS 13,656) m 0 1503 "' W DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE 19 390 0 N- ` 90 Ac o 0 310 0 0 (..) 0 5201 9 0 0 0 z • Z r- " R ,24 Ac. ° .23Ac. W as 9 • • 0 o tin n o 0 ° m i r _ S 3800 w 5300 "� a 32L 44 Ac — _ _ 1000 1 616 ssa ° 1 7 . 0 , 3 ti n 10 '� M1 p HO 96 ti w 17 3700 ° CO - ° � _ — _ . 0 0 1502 0 m 1501 0 o ��-, — — — - n 110 0 .534c. / 7 7 A c. o r: o 10 0 ti II • • C 23Ac. a r 3600 • i� 5 70 2 h m W m S8 °49'00 'E 242,07 5749 0 16 3301 r`� 8� _ m ° O 0 1601 o o _ ° 0 5401 0 1 2 00 ,°, /204c N. 8 a ba ii M ./7Ac. - 23 Ac. N m __ A 0 r An 3 0 m 12 -- — m °, z5 _ n g °D 8 5 0 w 0 Cr 5400 1400 �' o 0 �, `� 15 � 3300 �. 3500 .46 Ac 1300 28 A c. (CS N o II 530) $ ry 19 X ° 0 ?Ac. v O m 0 N , o o Co v' M = 1 F P O p d 01 Q I" n ti - v 1 O - - O O - h 0 INITIAL POINT _ ``,r • O•c* 4, 5 ACRES", 2 9 ,? 588 OCrE 01' °•b y 114 35 2 114 38 N88°584 224.5 490 X 1 ------& $9 -41409 1 ,. %:.:,, / 4. 49 43196 .L 49 ? 46196 12 5.6 0 2t; 6 6 12 IL 1.11 . 9 e, / N86 N 320 76 585 °17'E 588 °17'F TO PUBLIC 1029 /202 2 �' -, - , S.W• C R 975 PFAFFLE E p�'� ° / STREET �� TIGARD 60 SEE MAP — � � G \ i 1 S 1 36C A ., ( 1 S I 36CD ,/--' ll /' KEY NOTES ' 4 ` ' ; LO ATt ,M.AP` P OJEC N © Rt ` (1t �. � r 2' ,. mi SE /OWNSH <ACE> ASPHALTIC PAYING - EXISTING <ECN> EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB - NEW I \ ` ' r *--"T—AtiK LEGAL DESCRIPTION RAN 4 1'�V, SEC `T.y.ION M., 3 1' , T LOT 564 IP IS. Ida WASHINGTON COUNTY �+°� ACX ASPHALTIC CONCREtE PAVING - EXISTING TO BE REMOVED EC)} EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURS - EXISTING TO BE REMOVED y t � 5 Y ADDRES !OT AREA 11619 PACIFIC HIGHWAY DC • .. r ` T IGARD, OREGON ACCESSABLE PARKING ACCESS ISLE - 6'x 19' <GWN> GARDEN WALL - 4 HIGH WITH WOOD TREWS STRUCTURE - NEW Al e �1 . s .ft. 30,588 q 0 ACCESSABLE PARKING STALL - 9'x 19' MTH STANDARD SIGN in LOT LIGHT ON POLE - EXISTING TO REMAIN IN PLACE II LV IIlIIIII t ar '� Z ONIN G C -G GENERAL COMMERCIAL N MEW MOIL APV ACCESSABLE VAN PARKIN ARKING ACCESS ISLE - 8'x 19' lLS LANDSCAPED AREA - EXISTING / NEW / OR REMODELED - SEE LAND- it r ► I. I - 2 b . 'i ■ ;D OSTING DEVELOPMENT 14 10 i / SCAPE PLAN F� `I i> ::::. ; i +�' : ::u:EA RESTAURANT DSAPING BEHIND GARDEN WALL - TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER A r CAPACITY (4)- BIKES �� • gip s- � 3,354 sq• ft- 4 PSE) EXISTING POLE SIGN TO REMAIN IN PLACE 1 ill ■t . � --""' PAVED AREA 23,552 sq.ft. � G@E CATCH BASIN - EXISTING AT STREET a iiiiiUiiiiiiiiit IP , iii < 8 N) CATCH BASIN - NEW PARKING LOT STRIPING -THEW AB i . iiiui f�. LANDSCAPED AREA 3,662 sq.ft. 12 O% <SWE> SIDEWALK - EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN �1��t� fOII$U 7 �� }' CHAIN -LINK FENCE AND GATE - EXISTING - INSTALL NEW - i ii[i 7 ®'t 1 ' • 41 SW tilil ►� PROPOSED D SIGHT OBSCURING SLATS N SIDEWALK NEW 4" CONCRETE s i ie i ii i ` ter PROPOSED USE RESTAURANT Di@ A TRASH DUMPSTER /` DELIVERY AREA (EXIST. CONC. SLAB) STREET SIDEWA{_K - NEW 5' WIDE CONFORMING TO SPECIFICATIONS OF 1 �► j n � • `SWS THE CITY OF TIGARD AND /OR THE STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION i�r i m � r,�` �d 3'n 4* BUILDING AREA 4,819 sq.ft. (1.465 sq.ft PROPOSED ADDITION) DRIVEWAY APPROACH - NEw - To BE CONSTRUCTED IN s`r �i : «j,�� PAVED AREA 18.860 sq.ft• DW ACCORDANCE W1TTi THE SP €CiFICATTONS AND REQUIREMEN SIDEWALK - EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED ■ ri�� ■��ii�� OF TItE CITY OF TIGARD AND /OR THE STATE HIGHWAY DIV. ECE v EXTRUDED CONCRETE C URB - EXIS 1ili �, i � i ��i ; A D LANDSCAPED AREA 8,886 sq.ft. = 225 hag , IIIih i i EVE ENT N4?TES S 0 R �' FA' A - 1- ALL UTILITIES ARE EXISTING IN PLACE AND NOT REQUIRED TO BE qg . 00 I -:_j • iI Ii i , L' _ 2 - Q NLY E? ISTING OFF -SITE NOISE SOURCE !S PACIFIC HIGHWAY TRAFFIC r • 3- THERE ARE NO TREES EES EXISTI ON THE SITE WITH MORE i `�' � I � THAN 10" TRUNK DIAMETER AT A POINT 48" ABOVE THE I SCALE SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OTHER EXISTING TREES CONSTRUCTION_ .510N._QGNTRA. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL FROM p ---• BUILDING ON THE SITE DURING ANY EXCAVATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE LI ADJACENT INSTALLATION OF STRAW BALES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE AT THE PROPERTY SOUTH PROPERTY Ut' E DUBBING CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING ADDITIONS • \\\\ .aURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT - -- \ EXISTING PAS °NG 4 ROOF AREA 26.905 sq.ft - PROPOSED PAVING + ROOF 23,679 sq.ft. . \ - 1 P�oPQSEIJKItvG @ 44 E \ PARKING REQUIRED - 1 SPACE PER 50 sq.ft. DINING AREA ,� V CBE> (2,556 sq.ft.) 49.12 cP e n cn - 1 SPACE PER TWO EMPLOYEES (6) 3.00 i E X •---- ---- -- ECX H w - - - - -- � � . TOTAL REQUIRED 52.12 _ - __ r- ^i -_ =te r _ _ _ " _ _ S 00' 16' 01" 225 _ _ \ SWS PARKING PROPOSED REGULAR SPACES (MIN. 8' -8 "x 18') - 37 „% _. • �,\_ ` _ _ _ _ _ _ \ r , - '�%1-4EELCHAIR ACCESSABLE (MIN 9'x 19') - 3 0 - - -- - - - / — __ 1' \ k — COMPACT (MIN. 8 - 4 " x 15 — O " ) 12 ( %) 6 • 1 ACX 1n ECN - ��ECX>— J I . m: TOTAL PROPOSED 52 1 c encr coswn cau Pacr calr�nc calve °.� ' 1 ECN f ,, � ' ; a � �� \ V 16r ,. I i - , III di \ ��. • ' 0 \ 0 2259' (5)- AT 8' = 44' (6) -AT 8' -8" = 52' • - 9 - AT 8 -8 '% ' ` \ 6 4 �_)- 77 -4 27' -8 _ ON E 4. N STN S A CN - \ \\ a � \ \ E \ \ 7 15' 24' 18' T -8 "t t 8 ' - 24' 19' S ,.8 8 • . • • 7o' -Q EXI ST. � 6 ' -6 8' i . - A \ \? Li �4 — \ ` '' � ECE 0 i y■ �� Y LS - \ �'� • " " r — 1' ., a • . \ N !! • r t, 3 ^�� !!! ! .1 L .S. 1 1 (� 01, 0 .. N 1 •! ••' !!a••• !! 491, 2 . WT��i \ pi:� - �a,►• a t'•e c!$ ! !•s �_ e cse ••!•!4 •.�i `\ 0. l' C �� !'•4 ►�4 % ' ••_!w �•iat•f• �• • !-►•!•=4►� { \ r • J + p I 1 - ,P00...•* �.•i► •►►. ►•a�ni� � , -•ili►l+�l��i• iln 4"' a • 1 ,►•,�►�5� .1.�.+i�a "Fi• Av . . \ , , � \ D., X \ \ . \ ilD - - \\s\s.,............. . 03 I if ECN viiitti-__ L SO \ o X \ ISMS R STA - AN BUJ ►IN ►i ii•* - � GA \\ CBE 1 ' < . 1- + ' ,. 'l • t` ► • , i.1 lie _ - \N ; `� • STN °Q ? i • •∎ • • • •• ! 4 \ - \ ` ) , \ I \ 0. • I :I •!!! ♦!•! N„ . ..! 7 EX : - 0 ' . - - i EGE c4 0 �DDA C . ► • • i ° a • 4 ::4 4 -* ' • -- - \ \ 1 0 • - -- . r O E W — — — — - _ .. _.� — — — .. — 242 ° \ _ —. , .s .� _ .- t` - r..t -� • 2 ``S 245 244 —$ Q4` i &' 01" 'N 241 2 44 2 � q ��$ Z31 2g0 X35 - — — — \ `` „ 16 ' -6” 8' 40 - APPROXIMATE EXISTING \ 111=I 283.54 44' .n T i 34 -8 I i <CLFy EXIST ! talsT ADDITION GRADES AT EXISTING 1 { I SAN �\ \\ n PAVING - FROM TOPO- GRAPHIC SURVEY 'BY - - -- !VOTE EXISTING GAS, WATER, SEWER \ \ C CENTERLINE CONCEPST, AND ELECTRICAL UTILITY HOOK -UPS \ • INC. DATED 2/07/94 J i I ARE TO REMAIN IN PLAN AT EXISTING \ / LOCATIONS ON SITE AND AT BUILDING { i f 1 - U 1UIIES ARE CONNECTED AT PACIFIC f I HIGHWAY RIG-IT-OF-WAY // k i1ILDING ON t I /<7- I PPER ADJACENT .c. ,..---- ---- BUILDING DP SITE DEVELOPMENT AND INFORMATION PLAN ki I ADJACENT j ,. PROPERTY ' / SCALE: 1 = 20 —O 1 NORTH 1 , , ENG NEER' i\)6- F1 LL DRRLI -0001E/ RULL 6 RECEIVED CO INC. DEC 2 0 1994 C9fi,1MHNITY DEVELOPMENT 12/19/94 Mr. Sam Hunaidi District Permit Specialist (2A) ODOT POB 25412 Portland, Or 97225 Re: Mazatlan Restaurant Expansion 11619 SW Pacific Hwy, Tigard, or Sam, Mark, and John; Russell Construction Inc. (RCI) is General Contractor and owner's agent for Site Development Review and permitting. This letter is to confirm issues discussed 12/8/94 and 12/12/94 which are common to ODOT and City of Tigard (COT). 1. ODOT has formally advised Ackerly Communications that their billboard sign primarily in ODOT right of way at south west corner of subject property must be removed by and at Ackerly expense per conditions cited in Roberts', letter dated 12/6/94, copy attached. City of Tigard will allow issuance of building permits for Russell Construction to proceed with site and building changes but Final Occupancy approval is contingent on construction of required public improvements (sidewalk) which entails removal of the sign. RCI requests that ODOT keep RCI appraised of status of this issue such as hearings or filings and schedule for demolition. RCI projects construction from March to June 1995 as weather allows and RCI hopes that Ackerly's legal challenges are resolved in a timely fashion so that final occupancy is not delayed. q- „-I 1%%4 Loa i„w► 2. ODOT will proceed with RCI's "Application and Permit to - x, 3 , Construct Approach Road" after ODOT's review of Storm , o af N,c.1.14 Study and Detention System Design which are expected to 0' complete soon. RCI must get City of Tigard's approval aNcle"..yO'" z6 signature on this permit application confirming that site 2.401 '•% and building permitting has been completed before ODOT will release this permit. Per Hennig conversation with c, r ),,, r ,,, P . Hagman, permit for city street access is not required � bel because project involves state highway access per ODOT ‘N1ech! m. b.S "Approach Permit" above. C . 503 - 228 -3413 FAX # 228 -2770 2211 NW FRONT AVENUE, SUITE 202 • PORTLAND, OREGON 97209 -1820 e- -2- 3. Cross -over easement requirement has not yet been resolved. I will continue to work this with WH Pacific and ODOT. Thank you for your ongoing information and support in regard to item 1 Billboard removal issue. Sincerely, eleYs4 Don B Hennig, P.E. Project Manager CT Mr. Mark Burrows L>Mr. John Hagman City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, Or 97223 Norman Russell, RCI • • • • . RECEIVED L_ , - 7 1994 December 6, 1995 E Don Hennig CITY OF TIGARD Russell Construction OREGON 2211 NW Front Avenue, Suite 202 Portland, OR 97209 Re: Removal of existing billboard sign Dear Don; This letter is in response to your request for clarification concerning removal of the existing billboard sign which is apparently located partially within the public right -of -way in front of the Mazatlan Restaurant at 11619 SW Pacific Highway. The State has requested that the owner remove the sign which is partially located within the right -of -way in order to construct required public improvements on both the adjoining Taco Bell site and the subject property. Please contact Mr. Sam Hunaidi with the State Highway Division at 229 -5002 concerning the status of the sign removal. The City's Community Development Code Chapter 18.144.070 prohibits billboard signs. Chapter 18.114.110 (D) allows billboards located along SW Pacific Highway to remain until June 10, 1998. However, Chapter 18.144.110 (D) states that non - conforming signs which are relocated or reconstructed shall be immediately brought into compliance with the Community Development Code. Because the sign must be relocated or reconstructed to allow for required public improvements the sign is not permitted to be relocated or reconstructed elsewhere. The Planning Division will allow issuance of building permits, however completion of required public improvements necessitates removal of the sign, therefore Final Occupancy approval of the remodel work is in part contingent on construction of required public improvements. Please feel free to contact me concerning this information. Sincerely, • i Mark Roberts Assistant Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 • ft KEECH A SSO CIA TES, INC. V OW L� Consulting Traffic Engineers 1225 N.W. Murray Blvd., Suite 206 Portland, Oregon 97229 -5552 • (503)641 -6333 FAX (503)643 -8866 September 12, 1994 Mr. Don Hennig Russell Construction, Inc. 2211 NW Front Avenue, Suite 202 Portland, OR 97209 -1820 RE: Traffic Analysis for Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant Dear Mr. Hennig: I have reviewed the proposed addition to the existing Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant, located on the north side of Pacific Highway, near the signalized access to the Act III Theater (about 450 feet east of SW Pfaffle Street). The following are my findings: This site is currently a 3,354 square foot restaurant with 101 seats. The proposed addition will increase the restaurant by 1,465 square feet' and 90 seats, making the total 4,819 square feet and 191 seats. The existing vehicle trip generation from this site is estimated at 289 daily trips and 23 PM peak hour trips. The net increase in trip generation for this site is estimated at 257 trips per day. An increase of 21 trips per hour is anticipated during the PM peak hour, when the site is in full use. Access to the site is via the one -way jug handle which also serves westbound traffic destined for the ACT III Theater. Eastbound vehicles on Pacific Highway access the jug handle via a center turn lane west of the signalized intersection. There does not appear to be any alternative access to and from the site. Observations of the existing PM peak hour traffic flow within the vicinity of the proposed site were done during March of 1994. Additionally, daily volumes on the Act III Theater northbound left exit and the southbound jug handle were measured from Saturday, September 3 through Tuesday, September 6. Tables A and B summarize these findings. • i TABLE A EXISTING TRAFFIC (9/94) VEHICLES Act III Theater Exit (Left - Turn Volume Only) SAT SUN MON TUE Daily 1,835 1,391 1,434 979 AM Peak Hour 5 6 4 6 PM Peak Hour 196 158 141 91 4th Highest Hour 189 158 141 89 8th Highest Hour 120 89 83 70 TABLE B EXISTING TRAFFIC (9/94) VEHICLES Jug Handle Exit . SAT SUN MON TUE Daily 836 523 580 449 AM Peak Hour 2 2 1 3 PM Peak Hour 105 55 69 42 4th Highest Hour 90 46 56 45 8th Highest Hour 53 40 35 30 The only future traffic used in this analysis was that anticipated from the proposed Taco Bell restaurant west of the site. The Pacific Highway at the Act III access currently operates at a "C" level of service or better. The jug handle at the Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant driveway operates at level of service "A ". The left turn movement from eastbound Pacific Highway onto the jug handle operates at level of service "D ". The addition of the site is not anticipated to noticeably change the operation of these intersections. The proposed addition will result in a net change in parking from 54 stalls to 52 stalls. The proposed parking will eliminate two parking spaces near the jug handle which could have potentially caused congestion within the site. • ! . Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant Page 3 The proposed addition of 90 seats to the existing Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant will not have a significant impact upon the study intersections. The addition of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pacific Highway at SW 72nd Avenue /Fred Meyer entrance to the east has raised the issue of continued Signal Warrant(s) at the Act III Theater entrance. PM peak hour warrants would still be met due to the existing traffic flow from the Act 111 Theater exit. In conclusion, the proposed addition to the Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant does not significantly affect traffic operations at the study area intersections. The continued need for the traffic signal is evident from the magnitude of traffic exiting the Act III Theater. Attached are exhibits showing the assumed site traffic generation and assignment. Also included are the existing, existing plus site, and total traffic conditions which were analyzed, along with the PM peak hour Signal Warrant worksheets. Sincerely, KEECH ASSOCIATES,INC. Robert Ke ch, P.E. Traffic Engineer P.E. #8822 Project #94.030 0 PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant (Existing) SITE USE: Quality Restaurant SITE SIZE: 3,354 Square Feet (1); 101 Seats UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 2.86 trips /Seat ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: 0.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 2.86 trips /Seat TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 289.0 trips /day(2) PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 8.2 % PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 23.Otrips/hour(3) PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.70 in /total PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 16.0 trips /hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 7.0 trips /hour (1) As provided by Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant. (2) ITE Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991, Land Use Code 831. (3) Based on PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic (4 -6 PM). The number of seats was used as the independent variable for trip generation. • PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Worksheet SITE NAME: Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant (Proposed) SITE USE: Quality Restaurant SITE SIZE: 4,819 Square Feet Addition; 191 Seats (1) UNADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 2.86 trips /Seat ESTIMATED MODAL SPLIT: 0.0 ADJUSTED DAILY VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION RATE: 2.86 trips /Seat TOTAL DAILY GENERATED TRIPS: 546.0 trips /day(2) PERCENTAGE OF TRIPS OCCURRING DURING PM PEAK: 8.2 % PM PEAK HOURLY GENERATED TRIPS: 44.Otrips/hour(3) PM ENTER TRIP SPLIT: 0.70 in /total PM TRAFFIC VOLUME IN: 31.0 trips /hour PM TRAFFIC VOLUME OUT: 13.0 trips /hour (1) As provided by Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant. (2) ITE Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991, Land Use Code 831. (3) Based on PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic (4 -6 PM). The number of seats was used as the independent variable for trip generation. Robert KC- ASSOCIATS I\C, - CONSULTI \G TRAFFIC EN 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641 -6333 ' � Vlazatlan Vexican Restaurant A 5 ITE % b ♦ - .? 41 Pia-= b et. S i - e _t �Tr► , . 4 1 ) J : ) i" I 4 11 4 , burr, G \-\* , ,.., s ? 9 6\C .\C ; - t ' Q q m D 0 n 0 ° h N 0 Robert KC.- ASSOCIATES IBC, . 1 CONSULTING TRAFFIC EN \EER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND OR 97229 (503) 641 -6333 ' � vazatlan Mexican Restaurant .-„ . Pm Pew hir vAt., S l t e _t h ?r■ , 4 4 ' fr, -4,..A.Al t ' ?3 i ii , \ \\G X0 - ' e Pa o -�� ,j m D 1530 e . D. 0 0 CD a; (I) Robert 1 KEEC- ASSOCIATS I\C. - CONSULTING TRAFFIC ENG \EER 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD. PORTLAND OR 97229 X503) 641-6333 ' � Mazatlan Vexican Restaurant z c*:: • E)c.I s r/Adi -t- 5 !Tr T2/}f C Y F / i- , N A, , ,V 4t • P/ Pe *erupt. S I r e z • . 4 • , ■ 1, ,k 4.4 , ,__,_._.....___.„,______ ....._,__ .,_ - , ,..,._ is .4, ,,„. ___ 1,, i.,,, „.„,„ ., ___ ,_ ______ •,:-(0 , 4 r l 6 " i� \ arm a 9 7, \c• \c N _ w� 4-t s �, ac i4 D- �,� � \ (D d J )y3 c' D . I:; n n m CD Robert KE'C- ASSOCIATES t\C. ,..„,,„„ . CONSULTI \G TRAFFIC EN 1225 NW MURRAY BLVD., PORTLAND OR 97229 1503) 641-6333 \P Vazatlan V exican Restaurant � ;� . To 71-2., T�t..�-FpiC /'i. -o..0 Ito IV- Phil P eft. My v t1 ii = 0 .. Z • • 41 4 . I 4* , 4 4 ,, ,, „, * 4,4■-s... . , I i. Iv 1 Pad — _ � ,, 1 D - r n m 0) • 0) I . r., 0000 L' ''‘‘.., v• • • , -N" , ,..,,„,;0•, 27 *4,,. 4 z ,y , 26 : .7( sw , I - sw a4c i sw wstati 0 SW 4. LURA0E,... HO 6 i g 28 . , . . : .. 4 A s , naw000 ..s.." , ICAUSCII a PDtic iffitg., 1.,• -,v,.1 -. '1\ o ...: • V 9100 8800 §1 . •• SW r Z4' - 6 . 6 )/49 ,, < NEMLOC ' . , . . A ' ; RESCPT . '• SW :,... -1 4 05 •-•V mr :W ., 1 . 1 - 11$ drittl /0 ru . v i f . ck,...0 • ' .. .7: ' 92 ■ . ---- ffl OimiLlkie ...4„ 4 4 0 1.,‘„ , . ; .,.. <:),-„,.., SW LARCH , 'T T ST r, I It . . , .1:.•.• ,. , •• - • ',PC It .r, son § .7 , . e s STOGA , ... .. '24 .-••■ CORRAL ST 9. - - ) ....t.. st4 Rell . I . , .4 .:,•sw ENT t . . )., . „ An sw . 3 4, _ \', 2, SOUARE....., . ,w,,,,,i 7000 ;7.4 • c ; 4.1\ _ --:" ( N11131glirigri P '' • ."•'' ' . '. HINGT: - . 1 111." a . ...., • -I t ci ! 4 .1- ! ! .. . acr : !--! - • : 10 4 ., 1 e; ._.. ' 4 ii r BE. • • .. ..., ,. - __-- - ,..,., ••••••,i - 1 . \ , N, . ,,, , ET,- , i . ,- 0 MAPLELEAF • - 4: . .., .r M Fo' "3 A ' °I . Tt‘4. - ,,/,‘SA,CA, _ ST g , s, ts , ,• .. . s , „ ., __ - _____. ,„,,„ ,, ,,,E1 - ,.. OM t* 't - — ' ---•"- --- --- . ' a ,i ' 1 % ,, i 21P -41 ' ' g) '■'.-: ' • • ` :217,' _ __ , t 4 , 4 . , sw . ,, ;,,,.., T . ..,.., •• • , N z.l. SW ' FP , OAK OA sv _. _ __ _ ''''? ST r's , 2 s Hot.,_-__-, ..„:(4,,...,.., . Q a ? • ..•?..'.' ' • 16 - • -• • *< ,„ ..• c ...::. ..4, 0 ,1 ,„ ■ ,,,, , c9 ( (yr — 7 4 GREENNAY 9000 -,111 ! i ... ,, iz .... 1 SW .._ a E .‘ a , . I _ \/ Au wa lig -:---14..-- lir a rpm c; ... ‘>,,p . 4;,.... :.D,, '''ENOLPOOLI PARk,t, \CP P A .• -c'. ...... ..,, = = SW ., CENTER g w sw 7 "r .., _ lq° 4.',., ,.. ' . 1•': Ie • ' • 1,1 411 % SW CE ‘" 0 .. • SHADY .LN , . 1, ,,..)/),. • 4. ''.... • e e - sg .... .a,... . , , ,rsoR cr , - .... „- 9+ nom ST ' SW ' Ell ILIFIEWELii.'4't • ___________ . r A .,, .: ..• i A s/4.7), .. , • Aim • .... A, ..., ., . . a sw„. maw . . N,AEANITA . . ... 34 . .l •,• • . --- A LI NGSTAF -.."-‘ •, . , 1 . MP! II_ WE 10 ' 1 111111P - . •' • ': A ga ' 31 --- - a i•: "4 .. 1;111 %.-L ( ?-■* , ' ' ..-' mum - mom - pisol mins11111 , N ".4 " " ..p , ......mp}imiligis ' 140D . ri i nig: 'DAKOTA - - S hatrwAsimma maim, ., -..,.,, : • . • '''' 1 'C' '' iti;,;•. '-,;': „',';' V.. ; a'',.. .1". ' - .1: ie‘ - ',, e :_,' .-„,.:..' .-t 1 "" I" I w • i lia ti .. u• . \'., • • 'it M, ' . • :1., (--- g 4 1 Ry .,:,:01.,,..,„, r, 7, tiv,r, 4A, . .7' - SW'STILL Id 1.3. • - - • N ' ...A i 0 ".-. ':.•-• - • 36 ' ' • • • "il su — - E . .., ,i .. ' .:,,,,,},,-. , : , \ s' . 1 ._...,. . ‘..•, MI - P P',Ntf`, ..,,' .4t, IR" :.:,-• • " cr. r , . , . x, , . . . : ag ..2. ,I . :: "..; ' ' '; 1 k • V • N :....- r.,3v..,'ol,'-'.x. -4 .0 ST 025 " 44`..,.: E; • ! "' • ' • ; '.....i!.i..- :;. .--''. 1\ • SW PFAFFLE 8009 1151111y. "., N' • .ct.. ii :As: c ; '......;:,......SORN 0 ,f , ,A , • a - , e , v . ; . 4b, , , ipiti li ./...:: ...::: Hsw imorucv so i . .. wEuyili . 00 1 .....,• s I \ 1: 1 'f : ... - . 1 • , k.' r y •IE a Pil . ,- • AFD 1 W FALCON • SI . CA , . . c P . .,,,, s m ."'' • . ..,, s sw it. s, g s „ TILA 5 •zi , L i.' N Ewis I TANa j sw :T . . . 44tFI. Id Ham • \. • c p \ k‘Z.,..-; ... .. • . • IF , ,sk 1.;-:, ..• • N\ 1 :. u R s T A s T w il ti T . A ' 1 ■ 1 I S W H A I NES Rt .,, ....,...,...... prif.4 ,. - •' .< I I II ' ° . 6 1 1 °°° 7 SW 7 8 000 AY 0 1 ii „ 1 . P )- • , 1 b. - 4,.. "'a; sw cuwTo ill ak ' a '., g.i,zi:•:: • • ... ' TWERINE sr c , c4" NEM. ST L l "1:1' \ .- - ie . i- mg eig ....;-,....... .,.,..,..... 1 r . . • -14.THERVE ,. -ST- --. At • g e__. - - 2 "._ _SW. " ?„.2 ,: .0),_ *%0, 1 - - - IS \ N .. .. It,.........-, • tA ,131101P1113 - ' al • • ,—....... - • ' ., I P - .:•,- • - 7.....X.s..., -a4;lk. 7 . 1 ' ...N .4 , ,,....: ,, M ssii. c ill ii elli" I c2, --h' 1 . " ,,,....,.,..., 1 i, : IR gdi: E., - 1- , ,...,N • sw• 'III • -- . m• .. 4 '- .. , • ?unimpiiii ! .4 5, • . .. s.e . L T S ,......, ,,,, i ! I ST 1 94 N • I 4 - ct . ' . V „C,. , ■. w 11. "c l i a'8 • - so P . '''. '-' cr 1. ..i %.••■,1* ,',, ,. . . \ SW !E 1 ,. SW 4 . ,, 1 1 11; a z z 10 ' 00 7, ,..j 42 4 ...„ 2 ..„, 0 ,4, .P. ,,, : ,,, f; D " SW ERROL ST SIV,,...... I • # ,To c, A .i. „.-. ... 9 11 „.. 9\ , ,ss, , y , 4, • :: .a ,• CT; •'',.. • '... ' v. 9‘. F. ? ' r' .- */ ''.4 wi4 • .. .,.. • - • .1'0 1 = SW GONZAGA • ,.t, a ei, 0,, I c 4 ., w . ;WALNUT.. ' ‘. • 1-, .•,. sw ,0 ,:- . . - 2_,,; , . • • ' U ' - '' - " . ' 11 , :',.,tly,„; . -.: , „: , yx • N T sv 1 -00 -4' '-',:-,?. ' • '•;',,, i c7 i ,, ' 4 ; '411111:fARP ;'... P ............1 sw .4 ALBERTA ST 3 z t f. .A , . '. '...' "' '. ,1 ,..,1L,' • : ..'• • ! -.... . : ,.. 4Allit --pe.. 1 sw • ERVING ! a ,,.: •MR: _ t ,g 6 ...li '`..11 .- FONNER ST '41 ',,, ......■Y, ' ...1 . .f.; .; , ,,. ..' " ■ ... ;:: :''' . "; .." ..:: ' A ,, .?:.,,IPP.,..v..,..i. • 60% :. .:•'. ' ' • .. . A !!; S ■• I 1111i , 1 Z 'e• ''4,:.' ; i. . _.,' 'kit: ... "...VII • . ,,..,,, .._ • .11;1 i.,,,• MOTT WWI Rt. . .. .i. . . 4 ' ' .- , • b III j , ,. 2 eARR NOTTeT , NAT I. , mri ..s,,,,1 1.7: 4 ' ,,' sw -= • VARNS III. •••-■ SW MARION ST co. ,,..r4.. i g l. C immd 4444. ° ' , 4 • ,‘ s ' ' s ''..... ' FAN .1 f . 1 1 ee .,, ' 4- Ru se .,,p ,- .&....„, .itspi a .• • .. . 1::1 • SW .FIR' 54 ' ' • • • i 11 I-1- / go, , , a ST , ..!' 21,./. ,I 1 L' . . 0 ■ P 4 k SW , CHERR SW ..;.' • \ 4.11,1 7. ••.::'• • .......;;;.. c e?s• S a 3 _. $. CT ' •.. I ' ' •:.':' 4 : ,,•■'/ - Rd SS : :.'... SW ile . MACE, - .4s- •s" ' ■ - SANDBuRG . ....., lis ,,, isARxv W .... 5 T , ‘• OR . t.1 .7/1 . * SW EDGEWOOD ST I o 1 3 3 < 94 ,. • 4 ,•? L . • ' ". 941.11 .., . <& /4 . 4` s 'iN 4, ..; HISLWLVIEW ROSE 4,, # , SW • - SW Faamil 9000 ' `...9,... PLA/A./ortt VISTA . 47 • , RT .. , VIONTOONT CT • ....^....._. , ,'7.I ili Hi LV ST 1 TS14.'' CH ENTER Ilir `..„--......_ .... kb, „. 9. I. . o k : . • - -: 3 'vas et b " ;' . u1.1 ''' . • marl ct , EltEll • 4, MCDONALD -0 . Illk . OR . , . • L. ---,,--,.,........._. ji II . v• ■ I 4 _.......--....- .., - ..._ . ,.• v . : 7 '''''' • 4: : . ., , SW 1 et 11 11. Illainarigra 0 40 - RINIIIIP119703 IMII Il■ . u Iv , . 1 1111 Z :.: 1 . S . "11 1.. R ff * , N ,:,.. 1 . . . I in 1: I . I z,. , , a .. . . ,° • , ..•;:. sw wa 17 - sw 424201 IBM LFOSE ST 9 SW ELROSE CT , r - L • LN ' I SW / - MEADOWS . „--- - ' -...q : ...., ,, :.• 4 ,. r, .. ,. a; : s„ . 1 e q • • ea , .<> I, - - — - - I.-. .. ; . ...3. i . 1 ' ; 7, CT 'IAN, • 1-1 ". ''' . '. . ''• ''' /' ,2),: -1 Y.: A . .A . ..' t ' ''.' . • 9 , sw HOMAN VIEW , ', a )., - , t , ' - .. ...•. - il ., "6 --- --4.::::c, , f,. - :•••• 4 "" L. • ei ' • ,. -...,..: s. . wiEW • ERG • ''i a t vsEw sw - 6R - Eiti§ ... . • R ii , 0 . , . . , ___.--- ..tii .,,... w, COWS V.,' - s- i i; i 1 ; T Iv ;. • t). • '.. . / .1 ' ... .„. - . ! ', :,: ' • ' ' • ins ; a bilk' . sw ,K; 7 a .. ., , t i 2 •. • , w 51 ' ' " 'n. " • • BONITA RD . • AM ., .i i ! .. ..... ‘000 SW N., _BONIT - A ‘ -- 1 "EI - 1 r, : ..,- cr . .. t a „ s 0 .. / _ it,10.2 , '', 7 ' ■ ?" 4 PINFIMOKi na lp . ,,,I "' ' . • :4.1 ;II, 2oto , .9111STIRD 5000 ' , ,1„ ; 9' ' 6' 114 ' :• ' 1 1 ' '. '44a141 ... ' 1 1 . Is . "L . "(YAWL( aa .: ' ,:, -^ g ET!..... i i filo t 1 c'rgz ,1? ', i ‘'. - I ..1' CT . . . '". 1 ''' . 6 LANG RO LN ' • •: 1 7 a , sdvis.caEs 1 1 10 q),14 II . mA 0 sc CERLA OR l sw a 3 v ., 7. : SW a • • _ RD `IF , . sw , in Kw r izo Dix woo° .. REDwo,A • .--- 4 m ( RI •'. 4 .... 4 . 1 9 SW . L T E OR si, L S: si t:C ( 1:1 j E ' IL al 1 , ,k _ S , K o P E R n :A 4u,. i ".. CT ,„ • 1 1 1712 sw MC, e '-• i -sc* ‘).4.C.,ds-j:747,1 su A um a . .. ., .. :,..t. .. DAF21 CT ESW IN ATTL : . %) q 9 ,‘' t 't 0, ... ' ' A 1 . " : ''' Sw BLE 1113r.:' ak osi. t .. SW riERFIELD A i g , z • A 1 ' t.... . .., 7... • : N Y G A., e - ,,,,!,... / .:, . 44,, .._ a Ratui • " , `'' ,. , , . • 'I " ' I:: ...- '..: !: :". : ' .. ' ...vi. oL a 'COUNTRY • CLUB '.: . ' ...; a f..., '12 , F1 ., 1 1,s A 1 a il lib 1 Sw L ' KABLE .. RCCK •-• q V . R ,,,,,s ''''t. . '' n 0 so's, DR 2 N :-: ,..., zg •,•, 4. c V-- _- '--- — .'t -., v .?,,• I . a - - _.,- sw 1 ''' 4f1P, SW S ii i tl , i / ii-I , HARR) N TUN : ".„.! 2, ' 4 I , , 5 , . -,y .4e. 4p ...E.tcrl.'":: ..7s11 - , ,... c.. • ' ' .--- At , , -!-- (?,-,. 7-, , • . ., _ ....... Pkc/f,c frbGttwiN tr i FIGURE 46. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT - ?in PEti.t - (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) = > _ 400 ii 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 1 F-- U w 0 2 OR MORE LANES Ft 1 LANE 300 1LANEEJ1LANE p w 200 -- 4 % w - tr J E- MON p 100 - ---- -- - -"'•■■,..,...........m.........z' F AB z 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 12 00 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - S VPH *NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. P9'c lfiGMw�y � ..)ii 6. //4 - NOLG Ek r- FIGURE 4-6. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT - P Al Pb A ,, (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) z a. 1 2 OR MORE LANES E S ft I OR i MORE LANES w Q 400 � 2 I R MO I E LAN I S ft 1 LANE • CC � 300 � 1 1 n- Q.. , 1 LANE £t 1 LANE ij:: � � 6 5, � • @ MD+I � �SU u o-rvr z 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH *NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. • • SUMMARY OF CAPACITY ANALYSIS MAZATLAN MEXICAN RESTAURANT - TIGARD Intersection Existing Existing Total + Site Traffic LOS LOS LOS Pacific Highway at Act III Theater Access (signal control) PM Peak Hour C C C Pacific Highway at Jug Handle Entrance (no control) PM Peak Hour D D D Mazatlan Restaurant Driveway (stop sign control) (1) PM Peak Hour A A -- LOS = Level of Service (See Level of Service Criteria) (1) The level of service, for stop sign controlled intersections, is calculated for each stop or yielding movement. Generally, the side street left turn movement has the poorest LOS as illustrated in the Summary of Capacity Analysis. This LOS may be experienced by only a few vehicles (those making the left turn), whereas the average LOS of all vehicles entering the intersection would be much better. • III . - - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 9/ 8/1994 8:54:34 INTERSECTION: TIGARD, PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT III THEATRE ENTRANCE VOLUMES: EXISTING WEEKDAY, 1994, PM METRO SIZE: 500,000_ ANALYST: DAVE CRAM FILE NAME: !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G =111 Y= 9 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 I 1 1 I 1 3 * * *ic±c *;ki *** *t.*** *!; *;tt *** 1 I I 1 1 1 ! * * ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C * ! ! '! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 70% * ! ! ! ! ! . ! ! * * 1 ! ! ! ! ! 1 * * * * * * * * ** *:tit ** * * * * * * * ** APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH . WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! _ i 1 ! LR. 12.0 RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! 2 ! L.. 12.0 ... .0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R .! L T R! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 82 0 27 109 ! 45% 0% 45% ! A ... A ! NORTH ! 6 34 11 51 ! 43% 43% 43% ! A A A ! WEST ! 0„ 1534 87 1621 ! 0% 58% 13% ! ... B A. ! EAST ! 0 1873 0 1873 ! 0% 70% 0% ! ... C ! APPR!_TRKS! !X— WLK!PEDS? ?L'0! ! PHASING ! 1 ! I I I I 1 • S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! 1 N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S— DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W —NO SEPARATE TURN PHASE (C -1)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- ! ! ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LTR ! .000 .028 .000 .000 TR - ! .000 .025 .450 .000 ! LT ! .000. .022 .000 .000 LR ! .030 .000. .000 .000 ! R ! .015 .006 .048 .000 T ! .000 .019 - .426 .520 ! L ! .026 .003 .000 .000 ! N —S V/C =.100 E —W V/C =.520 TOTAL AMBER =.075 MINIMUM V/C =.050 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! 1 1 1 I SOUTH ! 262 ! SOUTH ! 8.9 .0 8.9 ! * ** * ** 0 ! NORTH ! 59 ! NORTH ! 8.9 8.9 8.9 ! 0 79 0 WEST ! 4078 ! WEST ! - .0 93.1 93.1 ! 0 303 0 ! EAST ! 3911 ! - EAST ! .0 93.1 .0 ! 0 350 0 ! * ** = CALCULATE MANUALLY III -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 9/ 8/1994 8:56:13 INTERSECTION: TIGARD, PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT III THEATRE ENTRANCE VOLUMES: EXISTING + SITE, 1994, PM METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: DAVE CRAM FILE NAME: MAZATLAN !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G =111 Y= 9 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1 1 I I 1 1 1 * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 70% * I I 1 I ! 1 1 * * • 1 1 1 1 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! I 1 1 LR. 12.0 RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! 2 ! L.. 12.0 ... .0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R! L T R ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 82 0 27 109 ! 45% 0% 45% ! A ... A ! NORTH ! 8 34 15 57 ! 47% 47% 47% ! A A A ! WEST ! 0 1534 87 1621 ! .0% 58% 13% ! ... B A ! EAST . 0 1873 0 1873 ! 0% 70% 0% ! C ... ! APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -NO SEPARATE TURN PHASE (C -1)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- 1 . ! 1 I APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! ! LTR ! .000 .032 .000 .000 TR ! .000 .027 .450 .000 LT ! .000 .023 .000 .000 LR ! .030 .000 .000 .000 ! R ! .015 .008 .048 .000 ! T ! .000 .019 .426 .520 L ! .026 .005 .000 .000 . N -S V/C =.100 E -W V/C =.520 TOTAL AMBER =.075 MINIMUM V/C =.050 ! LEG VOLUME ! 1 TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! 1 1 1 1 1 SOUTH ! 262 ! SOUTH ! 8.9 .0 8.9 ! * ** * ** 0 ! NORTH ! 65 ! NORTH ! 8.9 8.9 8.9 ! 0 88 0 ! WEST ! 4082 ! WEST ! .0. 93.1 93.1.! 0 303 0 ! EAST ! 3913 ! EAST ! .0 93.1 .0 ! 0 350 0 ! * ** = CALCULATE MANUALLY, . . -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 9/ 8/1994 8:57:14 INTERSECTION: TIGARD, PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT III THEATRE ENTRANCE VOLUMES: TOTAL TRAFFIC, 1994, PM METRO SIZE: 500,000+ ANALYST: DAVE CRAM FILE NAME: MAZATLAN !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 120 G =111 Y= 9 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ** **.;t *-** 1 1 t 1 ! 1 1 * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL C * ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 70% * I I 1 1 I 1 1 * * 1 1 1 1 . I 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! 1 ! LR. 12.0 RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! 2 ! L.. 12.0 ... .0 T.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R! L T R 1 . SOUTH ! 82 0 27 109 ! 45% 0% 45% ! A . A ! NORTH ! ' 8 . 34 15 57 ! 47% 47% 47% ! A A A ! WEST ! 0 '1539 87 1626 ! 0% 58% 13% ! ... B A ! EAST ! 0 1878 0 1878 ! 0% 70% 0% ! ... C ... 1 . APPR! TRKS! '!X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! - -' ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -NO SEPARATE TURN PHASE (C -1)! E ! 5.0%! ! E ! -- ! ! ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! 1 LTR- ! .000 - - .032 . .000 .000 ! TR ! .000 .027 .452 .000 LT ! .000 .023 .000 .000 LR ! .030 .000 .000 .000 R ! .015 .008 .048 .000 T ! .000 .019 .428 .522 L ! .026 .005 .000 .000 . N -S V/C =.100 E -W V/C =.522 TOTAL AMBER =.075 MINIMUM V/C =.050 ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE LEG 1 . AT LOS C ! APPR ! .L T R ! L T R ! ! ! 1 ! SOUTH ! 262 ! SOUTH ! 8.9 .0 8.9 ! * ** * ** 0 NORTH ! 65 ! NORTH ! 8.9 8.9 8.9 ! 0 88 0 WEST ! 4084 ! WEST ! .0 93.1 93.1'! 0 303 0 ! EAST ! 3915 ! EAST ! .0 93.1 .0 ! 0 350 0 . * ** = CALCULATE MANUALLY • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY @ JUG HANDLE ENTRANCE . - -x D x Jug Handle E Date of Count: Existing x x Day of Week: Weekday x x Time of Day: PM Peak xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 4 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%:B 0%:D 0% Pacific Highway SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none APPROACH »»>>>A<<<<<« » » » >D « « < << » » » >C «« «< » »»>B < < << <<< MOVEMENT AL .AT AR - DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 10 1557 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 1873 50 • PCH 11 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR -rBT= 1442.25 CAPACITY 182 CRITICAL GAP= 5.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 182 CAPACITY USED= 6.04% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .96 DEMAND (LOS =D) 11 • LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY @ JUG HANDLE ENTRANCE x D x Jug Handle E Date of Count: Existing - Site :< Day o` Week: Weekday X Time of Day: PM Peak Yxxx_:_;xxZxxx XXXXXX1XXXXX Prevailing Speed: 45 :> D # cif lanes on major street: 4 A APPROACH GRADES: xxXXxxxxxyxxxxx_z XXXX .X_: xxx A 0%:8 0 0: D 0% Pacific Highway SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none APPROACH >>>>>>> A<<<<<<<>>>>>>> D<<<<< <<>>>>>>>C<< << <<< > >> > > > >B< << <<<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 19 1559 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1873 56 PCH 21 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR =BT= 1446.75 CAPACITY 181 CRITICAL GAP= 5.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 181 CAPACITY USED= 11.6% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .92 DEMAND (LOS =D) 21 • LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH • 1 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY @ JUG HANDLE ENTRANCE x D x Jug Handle E Date of Count: Total Traffic Day of Week: Weekday - �: Time of Dav_: PM Peak :_x XXxX=XXXx :z.s:<: :xxXxx :xx Prevailing Speed: 45 B # of lanes on major street: 4 APPROACH GRADES: x1Z xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%:13 0%:D 0% Pacific Highway SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: none APPROACH >>>>>>> A<<<<<<<>>>>>>> D<<<<< < <>>>>> > >C< <<<< <<>> > > >>>B< < <<<<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 19 1564 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1878 56 PCH 21 LEFT TURNS FROM A (AL) CONFLICTING FLOW BR-'.BT= 1450.5 CAPACITY 120 CRITICAL GAP= 5.5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1 80 CAPACITY USED= 11.67% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .92 DEMAND (LOS =D) 2� • LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of-PCH • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT 3 THEATRE ENTRANCE x D x MAZATLAN RES Date of Count: EXISTING x x Day of Week: WEEKDAY x Time of Day: PM PEAK • xxxxxXxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 20 B # of lanes on major street: 1 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxXXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0 %:B 0 %:D 2% ACT 3 ENTRANCE SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: APPROACH >>>>>>> A<<«<<<>>>>>>> D<< <<<< < > >> >>> >C < «« < <»»> > >B < <<<<<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 47 16 PCH 10 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR =BT= 55 CAPACITY 1145 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1145 CAPACITY USED= .87% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS =A) 10 CAPACITY OF SHARED LANES FOR APPROACH D 0 DEMAND (LOS =E) 0 LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH +r • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT 3 THEATRE ENTRANCE x D x MAZATLAN RES Date of Count: EXISTING = SITE x x Day of Week: WEEKDAY x x Time of Day: PM PEAK • xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx= Prevailing Speed: 20 B # of lanes on major street: 1 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0%:B 0 %: D 2% ACT 3 ENTRANCE SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: APPROACH >>>>>>> A<<<<<<<>>>>>>> D < <<<< < < >>> >> > >C<< <<< < <>>>>>>>B««<<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 47 31 PCH 18 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR+BT= 62.5 CAPACITY 1138 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1138 CAPACITY USED= 1.58% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS =A) 18 CAPACITY OF SHARED LANES FOR APPROACH D 0 DEMAND (LOS =E) 0 • LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH 4 . UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CAPACITY WORKSHEET PACIFIC HIGHWAY AT ACT 3 THEATRE ENTRANCE x D x MAZATLAN RES Date of Count: TOTAL TRAFFIC x .Y Day of Week: WEEKDAY _Y < Time of Day: PM PEAK xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx Prevailing Speed: 20 B # of lanes on major street: 1 A APPROACH GRADES: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A 0 %:B 0 %:D 2% ACT 3 ENTRANCE SHARED LANES: APPROACH D: APPROACH >>>>>>>A««<<<>>>>>>> D < <<<<<< >>>> >>>C_ < «« <<> >>>>>>B <<< < <<< MOVEMENT AL AT AR DL DT DR CL CT CR BL BT BR VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 47 31 PCH 18 RIGHT TURNS FROM D (DR) CONFLICTING FLOW .5BR =BT= 62.5 CAPACITY 1138 CRITICAL GAP= 5SEC. IMPEDANCE ADJUSTMENT= 1 ADJUSTED CAPACITY 1138 CAPACITY USED= 1.58% IMPEDANCE CREATED= .99 DEMAND (LOS =A) 18 CAPACITY OF SHARED LANES FOR APPROACH D 0 DEMAND (LOS =E) 0 LOS = Level of Service (11/89) On major streets with 4 lanes, conflicting voluume equals0.75 of PCH