Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1994-00017
exli6Jori A • I CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 WALTER AMAN APPLICATION: The applicant requests site development review approval to allow construction of a 38,160 square foot building addition to an existing 16,250 square foot professional office and business support services building. Zone: C -G (General Commercial). Location: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). The site is located along the northerly side of SW Pacific Highway, northeasterly of the intersection of SW Pfaffle Street and SW Pacific Highway. SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a driveway with curb returns with a minimum radius of 25 feet for approval by the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division to perform work within the right -of -way of SW Pacific Highway (99W). A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of the building permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall remove and replace the existing driveways and sidewalk as shown on the site plan. The sidewalk shall be eight feet wide as measured from the face of the curb. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department. 4. The applicant shall provide for on -site water quality treatment, as shown on the site plan, as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. Design calculations shall be in conformance with the general requirements of Surface Water Quality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook, USA, 1991. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 5. The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream storm drainage system will not be unduly affected by the on -site storm drainage run -off. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 6. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the northerly side of Pacific Highway, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department 7. Revised site /landscape plans and studies shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Mark Roberts, Planning Division The revisions shall address the following: a. A note on the site plan indicates eight trees will be provided however the location, size and species is not indicated elsewhere in the plan set. If the existing trees within the drainage swale are to serve as parking lot trees the plan shall be revised to indicate NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 1 • • the size, location, and species type of these trees. If additional trees are to be planted please indicate the size location and species type. b. Parking lot trees based on the ratio of one tree per seven parking spaces, in order to provide the required canopy. c. The buffer area along the western property line shall be modified to provide the following: A minimum of 65 five gallon or 150 one gallon shrubs, instead of the 51 two gallon shrubs presently shown. The landscape plan shall also be modified to provide a minimum of one row of trees. The trees shall be planted in accordance with the spacing and species size requirements. The plan shall designate mulch coverage for remaining areas. The existing chain link fence shall be replaced with a wall or solid wood fence a minimum of five feet in height. d. Provision of four disabled parking spaces if applicable due to site plan revisions. One van accessible space shall be located to serve the office building. e. Due to the existing residential uses to the north and northwest of the subject property, a noise study shall be provided to address the impacts of the loading dock areas on these existing noise sensitive areas. As a result of this study additional noise buffer requirements may be necessary such as redesign of loading areas. Mitigation measures should be specifically identified within the noise study. The study shall be conducted in accordance with the testing criteria set forth by the Department of Environmental Quality. After mitigation the proposed use shall comply with the noise limits set forth by the Department of Environmental Quality. f. Provision of a minimum of one bicycle rack for each 15 required parking spaces. g. Walkway(s) connecting the entrances of the showroom retail entrance and office portion of the existing building shall be provided to SW Pacific Highway. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width. h. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116 (Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage). The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, waste assessment, comprehensive recycling plan or franchised hauler review and sign - off. i. Provide a parking study to address the parking needs for the proposed use, identify the exact square footage of business service uses, office uses, showroom retail use and also address parking issues for potential subsequent users. The site plan may also be revised to provide a total of 85 parking spaces which is derived from dividing 16,250 square feet of existing business services and office areas by 350 and by dividing the 38,160 square feet of proposed warehouse area by 1,000 and adding the totals. NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 2 • • • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY Permits: 8. All site improvements shall be installed pursuant to the approved revised plans. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Assistant Planner. 9. Plans shall be submitted to the Tualatin Valley Fire District for review and approval of hydrant locations. STAFF CONTACT: Gene Birchill, Plans Examiner (252- 5006). 10. Lighting plans shall be submitted to the Tigard Police Department for review and approval. STAFF CONTACT: Kelley Jennings, Police Department 639 - 4171). THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Backround: The site is presently developed with an older office and business services type building, a fenced storage yard with parking areas, and a storage building. The City has no previous records for development applications for this property. 2. Vicinity Information: The site is located on the north side of SW Pacific Highway east of the intersection at SW Pfaffle Street. The property is zoned C -G (General Commercial). Properties to the east and west are zoned C -G. Properties to the north and west are zoned R -12 (Medium Density Residential). The surrounding properties are developed with a mixture of commercial and residential uses. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site has street frontage exclusively on SW Pacific Highway. The site is developed with an existing concrete office building. Portions of the site to the north are presently vacant and zoned for residential use. The applicant requests approval to add a 38,160 square foot warehouse building and to convert the existing office space for use as a showroom retail pool sales and service facility. An existing 8,100 square foot storage building has been proposed to be demolished to provide room for the proposed expansion. 4. Other Staff Comments: The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and provided the following findings: a. Streets: The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared by H.S. Stein, Consulting Engineer, dated July 11, 1994. The report analyzes the effects of the additional traffic from the site at the existing driveway and the impact to the traffic on SW Pacific Highway, a state highway. The report concludes that the additional traffic will have little impact on the traffic utilizing SW Pacific Highway and the closest street intersection at SW Dartmouth Street. No improvements are recommended. NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 3 • • The applicant shall obtain a revised Oregon Department of Transportation access permit for their connection to SW Pacific Highway. The highway has been constructed to current state standards and no additional right -of -way or street construction is required. However, the sidewalk width is substandard and the applicant should be required to construct a new sidewalk to a width of eight feet, consistent with the existing new sidewalks in the area. In addition, the existing driveway is over 50 feet wide, in excess of the city standards, and should be re- designed to provide a curvilinear exit with a radius of 25 feet, similar to the entry side of the driveway. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along both sides of SW Pacific Highway and the applicant should place the facilities located along this frontage underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. b. Sanitary Sewer: The existing eight inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Pacific Highway and has sufficient capacity to serve this development. c. Storm Sewer: Currently, the site is partially covered by the existing building and an asphalt concrete driveway that both drain in a southerly direction toward SW Pacific Highway. The proposed site development will increase the amount of impervious area. Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the city has agreed to enforce Resolution and Order No. 91 -47 (Surface Water Management Regulations) requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in- lieu of their construction. The applicant's site plan provides for an on- site water quality facility that includes a new underground outfall line connecting to the underground system in SW Pacific Highway. The facility should comply with the minimum USA design standards. The City of Tigard Police Department has reviewed this proposal and stated that an exterior lighting plan for the perimeter of the building and parking lot shall be submitted for review and approval. 5. Agency Comments: The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and has stated that they have no objections to the proposal. The Unified Sewerage Agency has reviewed this proposal and has stated that storm drainage and water quality treatment should be treated on -site. Erosion control should be in accordance with the February 1994 E.C. Handbook. The Tualatin Valley Water District reviewed this proposal and stated that the applicant will be required to submit three sets of plans for district review and approval. GTE reviewed this proposal and stated that the developer shall coordinate telephone facilities relocation with GTE if required. The Advanced Planning Division and the Building Department have reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been recieved. NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 4 • • SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to add a warehouse work shop area which is related to retail, office, and business service uses. The proposed warehouse and work shop building are considered accessory uses to the principal showroom retail, general retail sales, office space, business services uses. A retail showroom or general retail use is classified in Code Section 18.62 (Use Classifications) as general retail. Office space is classified as Professional and Administrative Services. Business services are classified as areas devoted to business support activites essential for business operation. The warehouse and workshop uses are considered as accessory uses to the principal commercial use. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot area and the minimum lot width shall be an average of 50 feet for parcels in the C -G zoning district. The site has an average parcel width of approximately 299 feet which exceeds the average width standards of the C -G zone. The site is approximately 111,734 square feet. The C -G zone allows a maximum of 85% of the site to be covered with buildings and impervious surfaces. The applicant proposes 80% lot coverage with 20% of the site to be developed with landscaping. Setback and Height: Section 18.64.050 states that there is no front yard setback. There is no side yard setback facing the street. The side and rear yard setback shall be 20 feet where a C -G zone abuts a residential zoning district. As indicated on the site plan, setback requirements are satisfied. The building also complies with the special setbacks requirement of the C -G zoning district which is 50 feet from the centerline of SW Pacific Highway. The maximum allowed building height is 45 feet. The proposed building addition is a maximum height of 25 feet which complies with the height standard. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100 requires that the applicant submit a landscape plan which provides landscaping for a minimum of 15% of the site. This applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location, and shrubs and ground cover to be provided. A note on the site plan indicates eight trees will be provided, however, the location, size and species is not indicated elsewhere in the plan set. If the existing trees within the drainage swale are to serve as parking lot trees the plan should be revised to indicate the size, location, and species type of these trees. If additional trees are to be added indicate their size, location, and species type. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The site has approximately 85 feet of frontage along SW Pacific Highway, therefore there is no requirement that the applicant provide street trees. Due to the narrow width of parcel frontage on SW Pacific Highway and the design of the existing driveway, areas to plant street trees are limited. If a redesigned driveway reduces the width of access to SW Pacific Highway, street trees would be encouraged along the revised street frontage. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 5 • • Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands is three feet. Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Parking lot trees shall be designed to provide a minimum of one tree for each seven parking spaces. Due to the parcels configuration and the parking lot's orientation the proposed parking areas are sufficiently screened by the Key Bank building in front of the site, the automotive repair and parts store to the east, and proposed landscape areas towards SW Pacific Highway. Buffer Matrix: Section 18.100.130 contains the buffer matrix to be used in calculating widths of buffering and screening to be installed between proposed uses. The matrix indicates that where a commercial development abuts a residential zone the required buffer and screening width shall be 20 feet. The site abuts a residentially developed site along the westerly property line. A 20 foot buffer and screening area is required along the the western property line. The minimum improvements within a buffer area shall consist of the following: 1) At least one row of trees shall be planted. They shall be not less than 10 feet high for deciduous trees and five feet high for evergreen trees at the time of planting. Spacing of the trees depends on the size of the tree at maturity. In addition, at least 10 five gallon shrubs or 20 one gallon shrubs shall be planted for each 1000 square feet of required buffer area; 2) The remaining area shall be planted in lawn, groundcover or spread with bark mulch. The west buffer area contains approximately 6,500 square feet of area. Therefore, the site and landscape plans shall be modified to provide the following: a minimum of 65 five gallon or 150 one gallon shrubs, instead of the 51 two gallon shrubs presently shown. The landscape plan shall also be modified to provide a minimum of one row of trees. The trees shall be planted in accordance with the spacing and species size requirements. The plan shall designate mulch coverage for remaining areas. The existing chain link fence shall be replaced with a wall or solid wood fence a minimum of five feet in height. Areas to the north on this property are presently vacant and zoned for residential use. Due to the potential for future residential use a similar landscape buffer is recommended but not required along the northern property line to buffer the proposed commercial expansion. Due to existing residential uses to the north and northwest of the subject property, a noise study shall be provided to address the impacts of the loading dock areas on these existing noise sensitive areas. As a result of this study additional noise buffer requirements may be necessary such as redesign of loading areas. Mitigation measures should be specifically identified within the noise study. The study shall be conducted in accordance with the testing criteria set forth by the Department of Environmental Quality. After mitigation the proposed use shall comply with the noise limits set forth by the Department of Environmental Quality. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, temporary, or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 6 • • may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height. Trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. The improvements proposed on the site plan comply with the requirement. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106 requires a minimum of one parking space per 350 square feet of gross floor area for professional and administrative offices and business services. General retail sales requires one parking space per 400 square feet of gross floor area. The Development Code does not provide an exact match for the proposed warehouse space in combination with retail sales and business services. Warehouse type use general requires one space for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed site plan provides 53 parking spaces. Parking has been provided at a ratio of one space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for all building areas. Use of this ratio does not address the parking criteria set forth within the Community Development Code for the various uses proposed on site. It is recommended that a parking study be provided to address the parking needs for the proposed use, identify the exact square footage of business service uses, office uses, showroom retail use, and also address parking issues for potential subsequent users. The site plan may also be revised to provide a total of 85 parking spaces which is derived from dividing the approximately 16,250 square feet of existing business services and office areas by 350 and by dividing the 38,160 square feet of proposed warehouse area by 1,000 and adding the two totals. If additional parking is determined to be necessary the standard parking space width may be reduced to eight feet, eight inches from the nine feet now shown. Compact space width may be reduced to eight feet from the eight feet, six inches shown. The total percentage of compact spaces may be increased to 40 percent of the required parking spaces. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 3 disabled parking spaces if 51 to 75 parking spaces are provided. This proposed site plan shows the provision of 3 disabled person parking spaces in compliance with the requirement. If 75 to 100 parking spaces are required the site plan shall be revised to provide a minimum of four handicapped parking spaces. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106 requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. The revised site plan shall provide bicycle parking in accordance with the ratio which is determined for the required parking spaces. The site presently indicates the provision of four bike racks, additional bicycle racks may be required if additonal parking spaces are necessary. The racks proposed location may interfere with a pedstrian walkway. The revised site plan shall address these issues. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. The preliminary site plan shows the provision of one access onto SW Pacific Highway. The access provided is 30 feet in width with 24 feet paved minimum, thereby satisfying this requirement. The exact design of the driveway onto SW Pacific Highway shall be reviewed and approved by the Oregon Department of Transportation. NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 7 • • Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. The sidewalk shall be designed to minimize the distance in which pedestrian access must cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots. Such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety and to minimize conflicts. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a six inch minimum vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three foot horizontal separation. Pedestrian walkways which cross traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet when appropriate pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall also be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obtructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards. The site plan shall be revised to provide walkway facilities to both of the store's front entrances from SW Pacific Highway. Signs: Section 18.114 lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C -G zone. All new signage shall be reviewed through the sign permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on -site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick -up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, waste assessment, comprehensive recycling plan, or franchised hauler review and sign -off. The current enclosure appears to provide a waste disposal enclosure exclusively rather than a joint trash and recycling enclosure. The applicant shall submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Transportation Planning Rule. The portion of the Transportation Planning Rule, which became effective May 8, 1994, that applies to this application is OAR 660- 12- 045(4)(b). This section states that new retail, office and institutional buildings at or near existing or planned transit stops to provide preferential access to transit through the following measures: a. Orienting building entrances to the transit stop or station; b. clustering buildings around transit stops; and, c. locating buildings as close as possible to transit stops. The intent of this requirement is to provide preferential access to transit by locating building entrances at a direct, safe, and convenient distance from the transit street and by removing other barriers to pedestrian access. Building entrances should be located in a way that allows a direct, safe and convenient pedestrian link between the development and the transit stop. New retail and office buildings located on transit streets should have at least one public entrance facing the transit street or, if not facing, be within a specified distance of the transit route. A combination of building orientation, distance and pedestrian amenities can work together to display and direct a person to an entrance. Due to the flag lot nature of the subject parcel it is not possible to orient the new addition in a substantially more pedestrian or transit friendly manner. One of two existing building entrances is clearly visible from SW Pacific Highway. The principal entrance to the showroom NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 8 . • retail area is clearly visible from the main parking lot area. It is recommended that the site plan be revised to provide a pedestrian walkway from SW Pacific Highway to both building entrances. For security reasons pedestrian access to the rear portions of the proposed commercial use is not recommended due to limited visibility available either on site or from adjoining street rights -of -way. SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies /, 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON 4 1 4 qI/ UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. q Zg . 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639- 4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 ../. `1.2 q PREPARED BY: Mark - oberts DATE Assistant Planner IC'' 4iLkAA0164, 01 1 1 b-q/-/ APPROVED BY: Richard Bewevs•orff DATE Senior Plan -r NOTICE OF DECISION - SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 - WALTER AMAN PAGE 9 I • • rIS►1ri�i ,, L-7i _ hid-- - , • I I , _ ST. r I I t .'.NNJ li L - 1 _i_. I 111 ' _ . lr4 1+u■ 1n MS 1 ��1!■ II r 1 _- ■ s r. - 1a ■• 4.4 o ■IL' .II :''! E 1■1- J ■ mr -- - :ill , -i II Ii • : i I II ��i _- - -- - ■ 111■ ''■L ! j1■' p - . I- ' „ip..■..w...... ■ ■ _:M ,r j�, F • III M lama _ . •: 41 11111111311s Pur • fr NV �iI idi LIN N■ 3 v SITE » a- �� Z A .._ r ,i , � ii,..11,.___,1 ..�■ J M ...I 1 111110111 I II; icr R CL . 44 r. liquip ”, II ill I 1 - %7. __,--z I - F im - - • i c,, i. _ Q to, - �� f ♦R ill _ it ■ . „9. ' V ■ ,,, (PD) LL a ' %� i • 4 1 x!4 4.. ■ • PHIL LEW1S �■ EMENTARY --- ■ ■■■ -: VICINITY CASE NO. . _ SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 -0017 EXHIBIT MAP 7 O -- .111► .O - 3. 3NOZ - • • S1N3111aVdY o nil NIYH3 . • / 9 eZ (ONtOlinB M3m) ,OOf I .LIiL I 33N31 )IN11 YH3 ONI1SIX3 Xr -- -- - -- -- : 0 . - -�- - -- � . -- c ONIONY-1 V . � . _ - - - • Sd315 • '."11 3dYDSONY7 M3N - I O I I . . • 1l O3 A Ot t3 N 3 e 0 � . I I .'JNI01In4 03 Oflrts .3_ i I - saoo 11 1 . - �N . 533°1 ) ONLLSIX3 I 1 f _ _ - 000 emu ' 1� 131J - 8 01 ' l I%3 0 o NI0NV� 1 . - I N 1..N3! pP4IISr ? 15N00 N -II 3.1. 8 51315 On03 A b' s x' 1 Ax 03 1 1 3 00013 . N1J II + s 0 .-,ZOL l3 .'NI! • • • m • R r� a 9 > 1'161 - '1! 'O • 09t'9f .. r t ' f I r , C R � 2 A ' : • . ONtOlrrlB 0350d0atl ?z ' • I o S-1'. t * ' 1! '05 OSZ'lf.� v' n' I • > 6 = I c7a 3NVd 0 39.0 7 `.... 'OS 0S 70 L -9 D i/ I ,, �i 3NYd21d I) ' II- 1 • is..- �+ ) 00 oMO o WA °' ' J N ,191 + � � • Sa000 '►PO - .. • • ° y S3n1VA° • M 931XNIadS M3N l Z - r • - ' : ' , 1 • 9a • ONIISIX3 12 \ • /�� • • a • so°a °mars -,0O -'•_� 'i ' � \ • / tvtlLLOna15NO3 N-A, 1dAI °NLL51%3 . . alit! o 1 NO M3 I t r 1/ .0 • .. . \ / 1 A3NVdR7�0 L-B /M eY7S� - • • wows %N'8 •A? . - / I . a3arneaad5.3h \ 91 9NI1SIX3 Si • ONI151 3 \ /. No-.001 '13 0001A j ;' 0 -.98 13 I "ill , Y3NY 70311!01 '11 'OS 09 f I - o 19, (Z) . a0 'OaVO14...' � 1;4311 tld ___21—N... ___21—N... • - I • A80 I A tlMF1O Oi 31 1pVd MS SS9 t t � 71.:: I . S31311 SYO '151X3 / \ I OIOl1n9 ONLLSIX3 3a j 15 ' v ; 9 T.SS '9'3 '151X3 / \ . • • . . / NI 1N3 tlY13. O :it I dntla�oM11V01 - / ' • Val' (KnNiNin 4) / Aan Sit • n • • • 3 ° glo H ` I , rlln ` , of � S ' dnYa 3/H ONLL$Ix3 pmbn3a 39 • = Sa31Nii I d. 1 13 • D 01 33N3 - XNIt "I • , ' iianvd * seam Ukti :. • 9 . • - - Di 0 i -3 YO:O cv�. 1YyI �,/^� ONI AYd •;15U(3 • !0 3°• Q- .�'. ` omintld 3 Y M3N ' d V/ OI • ao- S33a -' earb :9' i.. �p � t� y ; �.t 3:I(' S1�YJI([i / ; : : SWJ , T 1 40 1 3iY:N015N aY310: �,�: = F+ � Mo. c ..F.I �i. 1ea �J w e. � m• � t� ') I ( _ , < 11 •a01 11nYA • • >� ` - �' NI n a015 N t4 MOl!%3V9 M3N ..ata asa3 0018 0 6Q SD ' ` ... ...........e:. » ..-� N 1 r AY • � � Ol 3NI1 �a - , . O • ;� M3AIa0 1 OV3 3N Ha3n. O 151 - - - `NI `\ •:3a of 30tH! • I1 •. i:9 • M3N , - > 3AOM O • / , ' ON U ( Yd. M 3A0n3a 38 Ol t4 ... 10 3003 man n. : : nn09 _ oNLLsIX3 33N31 XMl t . a � } '_ • NIYH3 ONLLSIX3 , . • OlA 3n- •Nn :i.:. : - 3N11 • �•- V 13 t I° tx! C H tx] * , 1 CIT OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. : `, J • • �C v1.� , 1S136DB -00600 1S136D8- 00700• TYSON, ALFRED J ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF THE LARSON, RAYMOND K NORTHWEST, INC 28275 NW DORLAND RD 3601 6TH AVE S HILLSBORO OR 97124 SEATTLE WA 98134 1S136DB -00800 1S136DB -00900 MORRIS, JOHN C DAISY E GENSMAN, MITCHELL EDWARD 11621 SW PACIFIC HWY 963 SW WESTWOOD DR TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 1S136DB -01000 1S136DB -01100 GENSMAN, LEE R & ALICE L SIMONSON, KATHRYN A % GENSMAN, MITCHELL E & DEBORAH 11005 SW 74TH '963 WESTWOOD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 1S136DB -01200 1S136DB -01300 PATELZICK, JOHN J JR & CYNTHIA - PARK, NORMAN EARL AND CHERYL MAE 10975 SW 74TH AVE 10945 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136DB -01400 1S136DB -01500 SMURTHWAITE, PAUL R & NORMA TRS DORRELL, DONAL V G DELMA 10915 SW 74TH 10885 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136DB -01600 1S136DB -02400 DORRELL, DONAL N CHAMPION, RONALD V AND 10855 SW 74TH ROBERTA E TIGARD OR 97223 11642 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD OR 97223 1S136DB -02500 1S136DB -02501 PIERCE, GILBERT /GRACE ET AL WEBBER, JOHN & CARLA TACO BELL #1091 F 5452 SW 54TH AVE BY GEORGE HAMMERSMITH PORTLAND OR 97221 5989 SE JENNE LANE PORTLAND OR 97236 1S136CD -00101 1S136CD -01400 MCGRATH, STANLEY R TR & QAYUM, ABDUL AND ISMAT PEDERSEN, FRANCES TR ET AL 18245 RIVER EDGE CT 834 SW ST CLAIR LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 PORTLAND OR 97205 1S136CD -01401 1S136CD -01500 JOHNSON, JULIE A LIFE ESTATE AND SCHULZ, DAVID TR RICHARDSON, BERNY KERR, GLORIA TR 36220 RESORT DR 14550 SW HAZELTREE TERR CLOVERDALE OR 97112 TIGARD OR 97224 1S136CA -00400 1S136CA -00500 VENIEGAS, EDILBERTO B AND HERDMAN, CYNTHIA M RUTH M 11030 SW 78TH AVE 10980 SW 78TH TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 • • 1S136CA -00600 1S136CA -00700 ALSTOTT, BRIAN D WALKER, ELAINE A 11070 SW 78TH AVE _ 11130 SW 78TH • TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CA -00702 1S136CA -00800 VOGT, PATRICIA R /PAUL J WEAVER, JAMES ANDREW AND 11100 SW 78TH AVE BETH ELEANOR TIGARD OR 97223 11160 SW 78TH DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CA -00900 1S136CA -01000 SLOAN, EUGENE E COX,.TIMOTHY J II 11190 SW 78TH 11220 SW 78TH ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CA -01100 1S136CA -01200 SCHULTZ, RONALD M AND BRISSETT, GARY M & KIRSTEN E COLLEEN A 11280-SW 78TH 6041 SW CANBY TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97219 1S136CA -01300 1S136CA -01400 REED, TIMOTHY J & JENNIFER C LEE, BEN H LAURA M 7775 SW PFAFFLE ST 7745 SW PFAFFLE RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CA -01500 1S136CA -01501 HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASS ATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES II HAWTHORNE VILLA A OCIATES II PO BOX 389 PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 1S136CA -01502 1S136CA -01503 HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCI S I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASS ATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSO ATES II HAWTHORNE VILLA OCIATES II PO BOX 389 PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 1S136CA -01504 1S136CA -01505 HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIA ES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASS IATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSO ATES II HAWTHORNE VILLA SOCIATES II PO BOX.389 PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 1S136CA -01600 1S136CA -01601 HALL, DONALD W & GRACE L AND HALL, DONALD W AND GRACE L HALL, JOHN G & PARKER, CAROL J HALL, JOHN G ET AL _ % AMAN, WALTER S & AMAN, WALTER L 1300 SW 5TH AVE #3009 PO BOX 19089 PORTLAND OR 97201 PORTLAND OR 97216 1S136CA -01700 1S136CA -01800 WATTS, KENNETH GILEBRT MILNE REAL PROPERTIES, INC PO BOX 230925 P 0 BOX 2740 TIGARD OR 97281 PORTLAND OR 97208 • • 1S136CA -06100 ORCAL INVESTMENT 400 S EL CAMINO REAL SUITE 1100 SAN MATEO CA 94402 WALTER AMAN 10626 SW BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND OR 97219 • i 410 • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON • ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I. Ti KO LOOVL , being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) 1 That I am a ►_, `I� . 1 ' ( . [�_tb. L, for The City of Tiga d, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: V That I served.NOTTICE OF DECISION FOR: 1/ of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named Ions at th a dre s shown opp,, the attached list marked exhibit "B" on the t day of 19`Wy , said notice NOTICE OF D C JSION as her to att shed, was pos a ,pn an appropriate bulletin board on the UA day of +P V , 1 1 ; and depo kited in the United States Mail on the 1 \ \\ day of , 19 , postage prepaid. . NU rt Prepared Notice Su ibed and sworn /affirmed before me on the / ` day o / / . t// A r 19 . M ' f ic e /i4 e 2 j rs �~ OFFICIAI SEAL 1, NOTAR IC /REGON g"; . DIANE M. JELDERKS f. O ? Y ,, NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON My Commission res 6 41 COMMISSION NO. OOB977 ( ) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES .SfPT. 7. 199:1 'k • itb 0 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: 13/Q CI Z-/ - go /7 f� FILE TITLE: 7f i-v►Qr.1 Poe) / SaieS r 41/ '�ll9 APPLICANT : L 1 /- ems 4 a 0 OWNER : Q / e 676 s w eq. /40- 8 1id (JO 4 vd © Q 9 J R / / REQUE T : Ca�s�v -t r ef - 6t L id / O CO scyu a�.e '.'., c:SIN & �o a -e + I � i yig00 5<� P ( ( 'C" / C , � Lo „P6/1/ i ° g� . LOCATION : ( 6 S 5 W ad(' Pc 14 . w ' cc /y C l 5 i - S W lP 6 � �u K (d i 600 ` {- 4 , ✓.o .e vT ,1 La T �2d v -1 "Ire v Y"Ic e 14 a t --1/4 e v-c Sae a 1 citq h J2_Qi s `P o Q 2 v d seC /bI� 0-e S J (,4 r: G a ud S(,C.) p0 rc--- G A PPLICABLE VIEW�CRITERIA: Zpt--vi,a-,6( Ia.,t p- ile-m- - G"a �/ � C'Lt�e 4,� a I5• * 32 ) Imo 6 Z 1.g6 1-6- 100 is. t02 ) ls;ld6 .108) 1 o',vic . 04 i g.r 6 4 I ° t t ZONE : 6 , .e ra d p f Z.,0 04.e ✓ C ) o! ( ` C — "1145.- `0.0 L p� t/ Ltl s ca 2,..0 J-Q- Ci� 4'ry y, ( oo5 at�t el) ) CIT: a CIT FACILITATOR: i G. 1 S VC i $ CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: (''''' STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS ARE AVAILABLE�FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION: _ ✓ VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN 4---/ NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN C' SITE PLAN OTHER: STAFF CONTACT : . vi Q U k it-"a 1., e t "f • • ic .2ice ;. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. 54,3 9i-f'-- 6017 OTHER CASE NO'S: - RECEIPT NO. �Ll - 2S97Q7 APPLICATION CCEPTED BY: 7,4,460 DATE: - 7 26 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESSS /LOCATION )1/4,5"<"' SW Application form (1) P a ne, 1 1 (B) Owner's signature /written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. ] 51 3 6'Ci9 -16-, 0,3 authorization ^ M / ' A 1 1 (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE / ,/ / (D) Assessor's map (1) J Z PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER *7 ? S' /./ Gvt Z./`1 �� V 15; plan (pre -app checklist) ADDRESS /0.1.4 so✓ ilflt oquiC 6LA9PHONE (F) Applicant's statement CITY 41I4x/2 ZIP 97Z/ (pre p pp checklist) APPLICANT* Sa e -(G) List of property owners and . ADDRESS PHONE addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY ZIP !/ 1H) Filing fee ($`3(5 )- *When the owner and the applicant are different t_ - 15 Construction Cost Estimate ? _ ru people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record 6 or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DET RMIN D TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written p q1.7 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this / application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ ONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY , G The owners of record of the subject property request site development review approval to N.P.O. Number: allow /'.0"/,Sr, rc , 7 , 1„/ dl j Approval Date: j/ ,vJ% .SQQ. ?r Reri 71, 6.r/e...0/46 Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 _._- 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: /VOA/P. 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application DATED this 020 day of 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wi%e) o the subject property. (KSL:pm /0524P) • AL BRADFORD G/ CONRAD R! / CROW ENGINEERING CO. G CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PROPOSED BUILDING SUMMARY February 11, 1994 Site Address: 11655 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR Legal Description: (See attached photo copy titled "Exhibit A ") Map No. 1S136CA, TL1600 - (See attached photo copy of map) Proposed Building Use: The existing building combined with the proposed building will be used primarily for Specialty Retail. The Specialty Retail consists of Swimming Pool and Spa Sales; Pool and Spa Equipment, Supplies and Accessories Sales; Reflecting Pond, Fountain, Fish Pond, Sales and Construction; Related Installation, Repair and Service Activities; and Associated Office and Storage Space. The secondary use will be for Business Support Services, consisting of Data Entry; Data Processing; Related Fulfillment Activities; and Associated Office and Storage Space. Building Description: The proposed building will be a one - story, prefabricated steel structure with cast -in -place concrete floor slab and foundation. The design includes a loading dock area suitable for accommodating four commercial vehicles. Composition of Proposed building space: Swimming Pool /Spa Services: � S941(4 Warehouse 24800 S.F. 4.— 4 Business Support Services: Storage /Workspace (15000 'S . F . 1 -1 - 2 c i5 r t.l r,, ' S" Total proposed space: 39800 S.F. Composition of Existing Building space: Swimming Pool /Spa Services: Showroom /Retail Space 8500 S.F. Office 3900 S.F. Business. Support Services: Office „450 Total existing space: 14900 S.F. Total combined space: 54700 S.F. 10180 SW NIMBUS AVENUE • SUITE J3 • TIGARD, OR 97223 -4306 • PH (503) 639 -6601 • FAX (503) 639 -6251 AL • • BRADFORD CONRAD CROW ENGINEERING CO. CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS February 11, 1994 RECEIVED FEB 1 51994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Tigard, Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Attn: Mark Roberts RE: Pre - Application meeting As per our conversation, here is the information you require for Pre - Application appointment. Included is the Proposed Building Summary, Preliminary Site Plan, a copy of the Legal Description, and a partial copy of the Tax Accessors Map. Please review the documents provided and notify me as soon as possible as to the time and date of your earliest available appointment. My schedule is open Thursday, the 17th, or any day after that. Respectfully submitted, Bradford Conrad Crow Engineering Co. Michael F. Raines, P.E. Project Engineer 10180 SW NIMBUS AVENUE • SUITE J3 • TIGARD, OR 97223 -4306 • PH (503) 639 -6601 • FAX (503) 639 -6251 ""— • APPLICATION. AND PERMIT TO 40P Y. c.31.., � CONSTRUCT APPROACH ROAD PERMIT NUMBER 9. AF �4spo HIGHWAY DIVISION HIGHWAY NAME MILEPOINT ENGINEERS STATION Pacific Hwy. West (ORE 99W) 8.264 34 +75 HIGHWAY NUMBER COUNTY SIDE OF HIGHWAY APPROACH TO SERVE 0 EAST 1W Washington o SO ❑ EST Retail Business BETWEEN OR NEAR LANDMARKS HIGHWAY REFERENCE MAP AND ATTACHED DRAWING NUMBERS SW.72nd Ave. AND SW Pfaffle St. 3B -22 -3 APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS BOND REQUIRED AMOUNT OF BOND RERENCE AYES ❑ NO R 734-50-025(8) $ 2,000 r-- Aman Enterprises, Inc. INSURANCE REOUIgED REFERENCE (� ADMINISTRATIVEFEE DYES ❑ NO OAR 734'50 -025(3) ❑ TEMPORARY DEPOSIT P.O. BOX 19089 AMOUNT CHECK NUMBER Portland, OR 97280 -0089 $ 50.00 DISTRICT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE COMPLETE APPLICATION RECEIVED X Gary McNeel REGION ENGINEER OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE L _I X UTILITY PERMIT SUPERVISOR APPROVAL DATE TELEPHONE NUMBER: (503) 452 -1094 X APPLICANT APPLICATION.DATE x.4 SPECIFIED COMPLETION DATE: /17/1 i'✓rfil p gfsf S /3y jfP /1-11" REFERENCE: OAR 734.50-050(4) 05/31/95 The applicant declares that he /she is Me owner or lessee of the re property adjoinin the above described highway and has the lawful authority to apply for this permit. When this application is approved by the Department of Transportation, the applicant is subject to the terms and provisions contained herein and attached hereto: and the terms of Oregon Administrative Rule, Chapter 734, Division 50, which is by this reference made a part of this permit. Copies of the Rule may be obtained from the District Maintenance Supervisor's office. Issuing of permits under these regulations Is not a finding of compliance with the statewide planning goals or the acknowledged comprehensive plan for the Brea. Permits are Issued subject to the approval of city, county or other governmental agencies having either joint supervision over the section of highway or authority to regulate land use by means of zoning and /or building regulations. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to obtain any such approval including, where applicable, local govemment determination of compliance with the statewide planning goals. (OAR 734 - 50.055) SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1 — If the proposed application requires traffic control devices and /or special road construction, the applicant shall provide a copy of this application to the affected local government. The original application must be signed by the local government official. LOCAL GOVERNM NT CIA SIGNA TITLE D�� /� 9 `2 — Within 4�, lioygs,. • : beginning work and after completing the permit work, the applicant or his contra shall notify the District Representative at telephone number 229 5002 . 3- This is existing approach, all work being performed on buildings away from R/W Curb and sidewalk is in place. • 4- See attached sheet for additional general provisions. Also see attached ".!Exhibit A" for more details. 5- If an adjacent parcel re- devlops, ODOT may require a ioint access with this dr3vewxy- TYPE 4 APPROACH ROAD — CURBED HIGHWAY NOTE: All material and workmanship shall be in accordance with the cur- Applicant must provide ODOT with a cross -over rent State of Oregon Standard Specification for Highway Construction. easement for the area of the approach road. I Drwy. 1 - I 1 R/W LIneTht I - - 1 1 _- Wa Exist. W,- Exist X- Exist. _K- Exist. / A \ ANGLE OF SKEW APPROACH TYPE CURB TYPE // 900 "A" "C" - - X / W \ see L e r * 9 WoreC `o /(' �J 2/ — NOTES: W- WIDTHOFDRIVEWAY Q W K o DISTANCE FROM FACE OF CURB TO BACK OF P / I \ PRESENT OR FUTURE WALK OR 10 FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS C 'LConc Cur ♦C W, = SEE TABLE AONREVERSE PLAN X ra SEE TABLE A ON REVERSE 734-3307E (5 -88) SEE BACK OF APPLICATION Produced by STATE PRINTING • • • • • TABLE A y s «Tob»A fEi1dYip DRIVEWAYS ® a,....... nod stem 1 On“ f }' R 1411110111011.3 : ! MR s« ; Gut - ....... - 7 . __ ® D uuS en I TYPE A TYPE A -I Er... / A • 190 C In ���m / PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE A8 ►N•LT CONCR[i[ Type A Cab shown. lw.n. El mEl�� B 1-4- - : W H B SECTION C -C R ORIVEWAre 16 ® CZEIIIEMEM ® ®® _ a / • slap wnaWe s lay r.na11 1 20 ( Haut • 1 01. T7FE • 0 N e .11 (Sr marl A) Asps cons w.ornp surface ® 27 m 29 30 _ . . Cosmos air 1 C Conn.b a re s specified I® 29 301 31 ; 32 � T • —ti -- J m 31 32 34 Comp. curb AJ . J 0nw.o7 al 33 3i 33 36 HALF PLAN 17.11:""d o pimps%ea. "'111 Q El lall 44 46 m 36 • 37 0 ra hew 6 b Tao of eCOnenle '�8 loan J No EllIAN 006 SECTION A -A SECTION A -A Comp T ... ` • 1E1 Ea II CI ' 12x fAa 1 E C. 0 1 1 ora R `— L 'a A slaw wrratoN Cr E Apslw..arraeb f o I I I Guru nn. _ _ GENERAL NOTES FOR DRIVEWAYS HALF ELEVATION C4 T (Nimmons NSERA 1 width of Nrw.ay(W)a ohms on pass o as dralnap. a nor doped w a SECTION B - SECTION B - •atively doped dn.ori n 2 R the * a*toxe /mm rote of curb to boob or Pr a lut.r..alk or 10 leo. whichever Tap of Caws» E . daoance o lase ng Curb - 1 r �•R .ruse c urwt� 3. Whom ousting an n n sad d combine. 10»1101 only a mush t s revered for an w lnlatorT r i� - I 0000.01100 wt. moo earl. W ) T � I C� • ••a•••••• Apron when. n Sla used only .n. aan. 1 1 d..:pn tfp ,l1* pin (MI w11i a. Encomia: Ganef 0.. 3'10134 C� • TyType AIN (Y) a Type A•I(W. HALF ELEVATION S. Increase r eebsstl d MAW Coxn» 0114 *toss Imo where *00.11 a 0011 (ALTERNATE APRON SLOPE) CONCRETE CURBS MONOLITHIC CURB a GUTTER Bonet IS • } Rod• O7 t pint filler, • R It /notch d. d apart per ∎ • • .∎ Softer I l aur1 of pore T 0) curb • /slop. *Mre. .hen purr blur Cdr u1 0010,111 a. fa TYPE A, :Ire Chas patron to be reaaved if °p • • ..ce01 00 aM .. LSurt of we / Gunn Ilea . .. i = ups ule n*an of c 00 �- AC.pw. AC pr n Slop named b putter .36 bin 3 -0 b 3 - cc. pav • Y. a..,ln A ye, . :; : :: ` P` • ' _ • - : :: �. •` �. i :�� l l COs. 'al bas., min tar 1 • Bottom o/ curb -• e• • =••••- •" a '. • � �r e 2- fs l6 DOn -•• - - Stnd top.. a groor. loml Raa �� m.1.lwad Roc. be..,Issn var. TYPE B TYPE 8-1 tnln.wr. p1i apanaia p1n», For AC ruona In For AC island n CURB ENDING DETAIL AC Pawmlrtl AC Cohn nl (Fa True C.0,0.01 E Curb) TYPE A TYPE A -1 Fa AC Payment For Conc. Payment N I. 1 i R/ of 'T I Surf of r; mote ;.:,.., u oay. ml p• . I — Dar .E [ 11 z) E I Oar. TYPE C TYPE 0 TYPE 0-1 TYPE E General purpose curb For Conc Pavement For Coat Povement For AC Poymeni SIDEWALK RAMP }� 0110* 1:8 r. O,ncha d roan. A I m .....eb T a Final curl. 01 De, �y „ sled surlat. _ _ _ Cat e'. taw t ..•a YR� lini.n_ __ =7:,:-: — iv e:g (0'111 NU.. 1 aw• 101 009. m Ie repaired 1 . • 10 , Caro p..Mr. a:..ctea • tl•1 AC roe layer tar paper on � Mil gee B'do.en• POT. 3• Cone p• .Hue d.nU.al 3 All dowels 3'cc. PLAN TYPE F TYPE F•1 Romp .alalng b be .am. For AC island On Cox Pavement For AC *lend On Coot Pavement as will a D1.ea and p 1 purpose s , ©�� s, 3 SI va. QOB3%flrormal 0.13711 mo 00tH � r• CW GW_tu }R. GENERAL NOTES FOR CONCRETE CURBS ((�� I 1 T 3. 10 • aeel* :01»1 ® ROmos for (00*.oy* 3'0. 9w R4 Fix. IL) of par. 1 Curb E spo.un • E • • 7 narrow. Vary as Vt... plan% a of directed 10 a. 1.11 vats R..urtaang va ELEVATION SECTION A-A "�♦ .Hen naua' 2. F n r x1000) a s .no.n fa c ure I ype. Vory a. shown a plans • Eushng AC MY am cu t 4g nl • N • •ariable o. *noon a plane a as directed. TYPE G • Ja Spung Espansao. 200' mammon. and ell pants of langexy■ For AC ruond on AC Pavement Contraction. IS' maximum. 3 J14,4ylgn. shall be used in colnet11ng curbs of dllfe.ent ..001010* • E. ( E is the b»I rert:cal mm.nsan of those cure 0,•1000* having � IOp:IW1al l 0 slop. 01 1:1 a stee0er.) M:n:mum 011:10(00 tronethon length snail am 00 be 20' For *. I In 'E' _ �,. '' . Feral sat of pay. '� .8•aae kin 6o _ Rsafan 6 :7[, (Curb. A. A•)) • IS normal vary as shown 00 plans a as direc»d. • +r- — when r. nth • AC par i • ' m i t on r a ••••11 ,fop ,••••1 01 roadway 0.02' normal unlit. otherwise .Men or as directed & Dowell: All - 1 - e, length 00 shown. In new cow gyring 0*1 dowels afore TYPE G-I concrete In Bustin. Cane 0010111 drill M»s 11 and 00001 For AC island as AC Pavement dowels m In AC Wont dr*e 00..10. . • • GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR ROAD APPROACH APPLICANT Aman F.nt'Prpri apa HIGHWAY ORE 99W M.P. R . 6 4 _A._ 1) The work area during any construction or maintenance performed under the permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Hizhways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation Supplements thereto. Contractor shall maintain all existing Traffic Control Devices during construction, then re- install permanently per MUTCD standards and District Office specifications. Flaggers must have a card or certificate indicating their completion of an approved work zone traffic control course. X 2) All construction operations will be performed off limits of the highway travel way. 3) The access control fence must be maintained during construction and restored to its original or better condition after construction is complete. "tom 4) No work will be permitted on the roadway during the hours of darkness, nor between 6:00 am to 9:00 am, or between 3:00 pm and 6:00 pm. 5) On site storm drainage shall be controlled within the applicant's property. No blind connections to existing state facilities. X 6) Permittee to verify all utility locations for relocation prior to construction, should any be in conflict with the proposed construction. X 7) The spreading of mud or debris upon any State highway is strictly prohibited and violation shall be cause for immediate cancellation of the permit. Clean -up shall be at applicant's expense. 8) Applicant will install and maintain landscaped areas as shown o the attached drawings. Planting shall be limited to low growing shrubs, grass, or flowers that do not attain sufficient height to obstruct clear vision in any direction. The Commission or Engineer shall have the right to remove said landscaping at any time such removal may appear to the Commission or Engineer to be in the public interest, without liability for loss, injury, or damage of any nature whatsoever. X 9) The permittee shall not use the right -of -way to display advertising signs or merchandise of any kind. it X 10) Grade and pave the highway shoulder and approaches with ( 1 4 ) of 1 12" - 0, 2" of 3/4" - 0, and 4" of AC placed in two lifts. 11) This is a temporary permit and will automatically expire on ( ). 0 12) Permit inspection fees are estimates to be # :\ 2-o (Order to Render Service). A deposit of this amount with the District office at 2131 SW Scholls Ferry Road, Portland, will be required prior to the start of construction. Charges will be made on an actual cost basis. x 13) A copy of this permit and all attachments shall be available at the work area. Applicant's Initials f, �, • • "Exhibit A" Aman Enterprises, MP 8.264, Hwy 1W 6- This permit is also for the construction pf landscaping,drain conection, as per final approved plan. 7- Applicant must meet all ADA standards. x Applicant int. Oregon Department of Iran ort ti n fNTEROFFICE M �' g p sp a o MEMO ° Bridge Section X ° 986 -4200 986 -3407 FAX DES 23-12 To: Sam Hunaidi DATE: November 8, 1994 d Dis ict 2A Permits Specialist FROM: David Bryson P.E. Hydraulics Engineer SUBJECT: Detention System Review AKA Business Services, Inc.'s Commercial Building Washington County As requested, we have reviewed the plans for detention of the increased runoff caused by the construction of the commercial building on SW Pacific Highway. We recommend that the proposed drainage design be approved. The proposed design will limit the runoff to predevelopment rates. JRW:krm I❑ D sRiCT 2 A D . ;OWS ADDS :, ► . ❑ PL 4 DO •A r---� °EC 3 E_______El A TR 5 ti G % 7U1/ �L y /7 / /c. L- # A - 4/5PEe-1-7,1") • A� d vJ.�JQ P i9. r .✓legr "4 6,6,461) T - - C /PA c> L.. _ • &fi, 5S o ✓�� E /1S (kffgi✓ r If; • • • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) I 1" 146 L /4 AJ , being duly sworn, depose and say that on 1 '_, 7 , 19 9 4- . I paused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at /i6SS" . S[ , ci& f #14/Y. , a copy of which notice so mailed Is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at ,427LIaAJO a VV, / with postage prepaid thereon. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 (-5 {- day of q(A.Le L/ . No C () OFFICKSOL My Commission Expires: V C) / 7 h: \IoginVo \affmail.cit • • AMAN ENTERPRISES, INC. P.O. Box 19089 Portland, OR 97280 (503) 452 -1094 July 7, 1994 Name Address City, State, Zip RE: Aman Enterprises, Inc. Site Development Review Dear Interested Party: Aman Enterprises the owner of the property located at 11655 S.W. Pacific Highway. We are considering proposing a Site Development consisting of an additional approximately 40,000 square feet of general retail /multi - purpose building space at that location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, July 14, 1994 at AKA Business Services 10626 S.W. Barbur Boulevard Portland, OR 97219 7:00 P.M. Please note this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the -City. I look forward to more specifically discussing_the proposal with you. Please call me at 452 -1094 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Walter L. Aman FRC 1ST RPM. COST SERVICE s 503 244 1541 1994, 14:47 #195 P.01/02 . 1 • , • Timothy & Jennifer Reed Ben Laura Lee Hawthorne Villa Associat 7775 SW" Pfaffle St 7745 SW Pfaffle St PO Box 38 VYIIa Also Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 PO oar tg Pala Altoo, CA 94302 Hawthorne Villa Associat Hawthorne Villa Associat Hawthorne Villa .Also Hawthorne Villa Asso H a w thorne Villa Associat PO Box 389 PO Box 389 P Palo O B o x rr 38 g Villa ASSo Palo Alto, CA 94302 Palo Alto, CA ;94302 PO o Alto, t ltoo, CA. 94302 • • Hawthorne Villa Associat Hawthorne Villa Associat Hawthorne villa Asso PD Box 389 Hawthorne Villa Asso filter & Walter Arran Palo Alto, CA 94302 PO Box 389 10626 SW Barbur Blvd • Palo Alto, CA 94302 Portland, OR 97219 • Kenneth Gilebrt Watts Milne Real Propjertie9 In PO Box 230925 PO Box 2740 • 18245 Abdul & 2er Edge • • Tigard, OR 97281 Portland, OR 9f7208 Lake Oswego, O2 80 97034 R 97034 Johnson Julie Life Eatat ' Berny Richardson J Paul Li]:li ou ht 36220 Resort Dr 10150 SW Can n Rd y J Rd C D Y' Cloverdale, OR 97112 •10150 SW Canyon Rd Beaverton, 0R, 97005 Beaverton, OR 97005 . Holland Inc John Alexander 109 W 17th St 11700 SW Pacific John Alexander Vancouver, WA 98660 Tigard, OR 97223 Ti Pacific Hwy • xiga 8 xd, OR 97223 7 Galvan s Kenneth neth FranaeChi 37 Mateo es Guitron Partnership Jerome Franceschi San a afMat, CA 94903 11619 SW Pacific Hwy 37 San Mateo et Tigard, OR 97223 San Rafael, CA 94903 Alfred Tyson Raymond .Larson Grover Corbin 28275 NW Dorland R John Daisy MOrrls • Rd 4680 Do 2i275boWo, Dorland d R24, gwood Dr 11621 SW Pacific Hwy • Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Tigard, OR 97223 • • • Mitchell Edward Gensman Mitchell Geneman Ronald ions 9 • 63 SW Westwood Dr 963 St9.Wectwood Dr $ Roberta • Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97201 T i SW Pac Tiggarar d, OR 97 972222 3 • .Gilbert & Grace Pierce Taco 8411 *1091 John & Carla Webber Stewa is•Stewart . 5989 SE Jenne Ln 5452 SW 54th Ave 21wart Portland, OR 97236 Portland, OR 97221 Lake Oslewood Dr wego, OR 97034 1 11 1 FROI1 :1ST AMER. CUST SERVICE 503 244 1541 1994,( 14:48 #195 P.02/02 • Phyllis.& Donata Stewart Al prop Co 6149 SW Shattuck Rd Stewart Moyer Theatres Tom • Portland OR 922 621 Englewood Dr 703 Broadway St #605 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Vancouver, WA 98660 • Stanley McGrath Frances Pedersen 834 SW Saint Clair Ave Portland, OR 97205 • • • • • • • • • • • I • i . � 1 11 1 11 VCACPer JI /t�� CIT - WEST LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE ter. ame Address Phone Abdullah Alkadi 11905 SW 125th Ct., Tigard, OR 97223 ` 524 -1068 Bev Froude 12200 SW Bull Mountain Rd., Tigard, OR 97224 639 -2529 Bill Gross 11035 SW 135th, Tigard, OR 97223 524 -6325 Christy Herr 11386 SW Ironwood Loop, Tigard, OR 97223 590 -1970; 624 -8009 • Ed Howden 11829 SW Morning Hill, Tigard, OR 97223 524 -6040 Kathie Kallio 12940 SW Glacier Lily, Tigard, OR 97223 524 -5200 Linda Masters 15120 SW 141st, Tigard, OR 97224 620 -7662 Bonne and Jim Roach 14447 SW Tewkesbury, Tigard, OR 97224 590 -0461 Scott Russell 31291 Raymond Creek Rd., Scappoose, OR 97056 543 -2434 Barbara Sattler 11245 SW Morgen Ct., Tigard, OR 97223 684 -9303 Kathy Smith 11645 SW Cloud Ct., Tigard, OR 97224 639 -0894 June Sulffridge 15949 SW 146th Ave., Tigard, OR 97224 590 -0523 Larry Westerman 13665 SW Fern St., Tigard, OR 97223 524 -4550 Cal Woolery 12356 SW 132nd Ct., Tigard, OR 97223 590 -4297 Clark G. Zeller 13290 SW Shore Dr., Tigard, OR 97223 524 -0994 In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings on Land Use proposals in the West CIT area shall be sent to all the names on this list. Revised 4/8/94 JUL '6 1994 h \login \jo \cltwest.lus • • • C Name of applicant ,ii��9/v ea/fe/ACISES, �.L•✓G• Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # 157 31'44 ° ( 6b 6 /c)Ccet' g 7J24 3 Address or General Location //6 P✓ ,4904 > / //( ,Ay AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE , 1, A{4TE4 L. ,IH'9N , do affirm that 1 am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 5272 DEc/FGri/WguT iF'v /fib✓ affecting the land located at / /6.f S. A4?7G /iv, , and did on the 7Z day of "0"04. , 19 9 5 post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a eSrrg Div ecAV/l o7 4 //644/ application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at i41 vg got& 74c/ A/6 Mc/77c mGy144€ / (state location on property) This / day of �uC--Y 'I 19 9 SL Signature Subscribed and swom to, affirmed, before me this 0.15 day of -- Ti , 19 94 • . Notary Public forth State o r�g n r? r r . My p I / lb/ ' ; /.� .Y Commission Expires: WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 IOgV1yO\pO5h10lcit • • AMAN ENTERPRISES, INC. P.O. BOX 19089 PORTLAND, OR 97280 (503) 452 -1094 July 21, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: Per the attached notarized affidavits, the meeting was hels as scheduled on July 7th at AKA Business Services offices, 10626 S.W. Barbur Boulevard at 7:00 P.M.. In attendance, besides the representatives of Aman Enterprises, was the owner of the property neighboring the site to the East. Mr. Watts was fully supportive of the development. The developer received a telephone message from another property owner, Alfred Tyson residing at 23275 N.W. Dorland Road, Hillsboro, OR 97124 inidcating no objection to the development. No other communication has been received and no objections registered. i erely, Walter L. Aman V.P. • • • MEMORANDUM OF CONTRACT OF SALE DATED: October 29 , 1993 BETWEEN: E. C. Hall Co., a partnership consisting of Donald W. Hall, Grace L. Hall, John G. Hall and Carol J. Parker SELLER AND: Walter S. Aman and Walter L. Aman PURCHASER Pursuant to a Real Estate Contract dated October 29 1993, Seller sold to Purchaser the real property located in Washington County, Oregon, which is more particularly described as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto. The true and actual consideration for this conveyance stated in dollars is the sum of $620,000.00. SELLER: E.0 Hall Co., a partnership By _. -�i Donald W. Hall By: — L AW Grace L. Hal B : 11 Ae 1 .1° �� �i, PURCHASER: 11 i �' tl - '�_ m an Walter L. Aman 1 - MEMORANDUM OF CONTRACT OF SALE • • AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: SEND ALL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Steven R. Bennett Walter S. Aman and Powers, McCulloch & Bennett Walter L. Aman 3000 First Interstate Tower P.O. Box 19089 1300 SW Fifth Avenue 10626 SW Barbur Blvd. Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97280 STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Washington ) Personally appeared the above named Donald W. Hall, Grace L. Hall, John G. Hall and Carol J. Parker and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. A .. OFFICIAL SEAL ,� r� ' A i i,,,,,„.„ ? -:;T .;ERM.VA•:DERZANDEN � � wJ Th I / , ` } r::�Th�;Y BLIC •OREGON Notary Public for Oregon `%� COMMISSION PU NO. 012394 My Commission Expires: /1/4/9 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 14, 1996 STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of AO „01 ) Personally appeared the above named Walter S. Aman and Walter L. Aman and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. i Notary Public for Oregon /���� • My Commission Expires: ;_ OFFICIAL SEAL r: SHARON 8 TEMPLE . f J NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON COMMISSION NO. 011127 COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV. 24, 1995 DGA \HALL.MCS 2 - MEMORANDUM OF CONTRACT OF SALE • • Order No. 741401 EXHIBIT "A" A tract of land in the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55 in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of that certain tract described in deed to Oscar P. Sidler, et ux, recorded November 28, 1911 in Book 90, page 45, Washington County Deed Records being a point on the East line of FAIRVALE, a duly recorded subdivision in said County; thence South 89° East along the South line of said Sidler tract 206.0 feet to the Northeast corner of that certain tract described in deed to Walter L. Stahl, et ux, recorded November 22, 1965 in Book 578, page 373, Records of Washington County, being the true point of beginning of the herein described premises; thence South 0°11' West along the East line of said Stahl tract, 1062.3 feet to a point on the North line of SW Pfaff le Street; thence South 88° 17' East along said North line 224.5 feet to a point in the center of Pacific Highway West (formerly Taylor Bridge Road); thence along said center line North 52 °53' East 87.7 feet to the point of intersection with the Southerly extension of the West line of that certain tract described in deed to William F. Weller, et ux, recorded October 13, 1939 in Book 184, page 261, Washington County Deed Records; thence North 0 °11' East along the West line of said Weller tract and the Southerly extension thereof 1011.0 feet to a point on the South line of said Sidler tract; thence North 89° Wet along said South line 294.2 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING, however, those two certain parcels of land as described in Book 184, page 533 and Book 191, page 323, Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion described in deed recorded June 19, 1975 in Book 1029, page 202. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM a tract of land in the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No. 55 in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southerly extension of the West line of that certain tract of land described in deed to William F. Weller, et ux, recorded October 13, 1939 in Book 184, page 261, said point bears along said extended line South 0°11'00" West 387.53 feet from a 3/4 inch iron pipe at the Southwest corner thereof; thence North 89 °49'00" West 57.49 feet to the true point of beginning of the herein described tract; thence South 0°11'00" West parallel with said line of the Welter tract, 166.87 feet to the Northwesterly right of way line of SW Pacific Highway as now established, said point being 50.00 feet opposite of Engineer's Center Line Station P.O.S. 34 +21.24; thence Southwesterly along said highway right of way line running parallel and 50.00 feet offset from a center line of a a =0.20 spiral curve to the right, which chord along said right of way line bears South 54 °23'36" West 112.48 feet to a point 50.00 feet opposite of Engineer's Center Line Station P.S.C. 35 +34.1; thence on a 11,409.16 foot radius curve to the right, which chord bears South 54 °38'09" West 1.02 feet, an arc length of 1.02 feet to the intersection point of said Northwesterly right of way line with the North right of way line of SW Pfaffle Street as now deeded to Washington County by instrument recorded June 17, 1975 In Book 1029, page 202, said point being 50.00 feet opposite of Engineer's Center Line Station P.O.C. 35 +35.12; thence North 88 °39'00" West along the North line of said SW Pfaffle Street, 151.11 feet to the East line of that certain tract of land described in deed to Walter L. Stahl, et ux, recorded November 22, 1965 in Book 578, page 373, Records of Washington County; thence North 0°27'00" East along said Stahl's East line 230.18 feet; thence South 89°49'00" East 242.07 feet to the true point of beginning. • • • • CITY OF TIGARD • PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES e �/ NON- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE: fvs' 7 W1 o.2 • sTAFF: TEA .,/) • CA APPLICANT: . .� T T. ' iTh9 ) /!l AGENT: / 124 Phone: ' � " � ( r Phone: g3 9 6. O / PROPERTY Address : /MSS S. Pro C //'^/C ,/G *'u) ft / Tax Hap & Tax Lot: / 3 36 C l4 /6 00 �, �" w NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): S ICJ C� cr c P M Ei It E /U sn/,S' ;Ave— 7+ E ZA.L ' 6 J�Z. /»c / ^✓ • - • ; 0 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 4PPi Lb Xi/Wfr — LJ 3 T, Fro., COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: v /nl/& - 4 y CS /21%) I l ZONING DESIGNATION: C G / f CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM LoES T CHAIRPERSON: AO OSZ E PHONE: d - - fl ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot size: sq. ft. Minimum lot width: SO ft. Setbacks: front 44- ft. side Z6 ft. rear ft. garage •b- ft. corner 0- ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: /.5 % Maximum building height: 't.SS ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum muxn 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: - S SO ft. from centerline of H40 4 11 4 • Established areas: ft. from Lower intensity zones: - ft., along the site's • boundary BUILDING BRIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020): Buildings located in • a non- residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: • • 1. A maximum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 - to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacka•'wili be•.at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone district. Page 1 • • • PARKING AND ACCESS ' / t /') ts 4 4 Required parking for this type of use: £)41e £ Mc*/ Po tT l�'� �u Secondary use required parking: No more than 25% of required spaces may be designated and /or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: - Standard parking space dimensions: 9 ft. X 18 ft. - Compact parking apace dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft. Disabled parking: A11 parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for civic, non - residential, commercial and industrial developments which provide 15 or more parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every 15 vehicular parking spaces. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage areas, must be paved. Drive - in use queuing areas: Minimum number of accesses: ©�E / n/�_� .�.��{ Minimum access width: aA►f'�t �D � h? 1� l& 3-�• P ++ Maximum access width: 40 feet ,i�• Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking 73, ..J areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/ driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. Sq 3b Page 2 • • BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100. The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area: ft. along north boundary ft. along east boundary ft. along south boundary AO ft. along west boundary IpP addition, sig t obscuring screening is required along., eu-ou 'h•45.1•i, a we-et Out Sank c�c. Q.N2S% • STREET TREES Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as drive ays which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be pia. -• e• her within the public right - of-way or on private property w hin =ix j -t of the right - of-way boundary. Street trees must have - -• •• -r of at least two inches when measured four feet :•• e • - • - -t trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on he •r:••c•ing width of the tree at maturity. Further information on regul: ions affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. • SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. S r r a _ S O . C . 1 - u , , , [ S'. It y . SENSITIVE LANDS Code Chapter 18.84 provides ations..for lands which are potentially • unsuitable for deve •• =..t due o areas within the 100 -year floodplain, natural drainagewa • : , . = land as, o • slopes in excess of 25 percent, or • on unstable • • d. Staff will empt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands - y at the V tion conference based on available information. S. , the spo • • • w. precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and the bou arie./ is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definit ns o � e - sitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with he development application. Page 3 • • • . Chapter 18.84 also provides =•••l- io for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands ..s. n cases, dedication of 100 - year floodplain areas to the Ci f and open space areas is required as a condition of the a.. - development application. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS Prb t/, s(e 440 AL , 4 Ck 4 461 1 44A1 lifigYftiS14 . Co* 11 2-‘01i1 4W d/p'aka 7 ft r cpeu 1 9141 C/7" ,Po • PROCEDURE Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.H. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed protect should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will preform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision or public bearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division.-. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. .Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10 day . public appeal period follows all land use decisions. appeal on this matter would be heard by the P L,4AGS M/C C 0 AN*PSf d . A basic flowchart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. -. . Page 4 • • r �.. This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre - application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre - application conference, unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. • PREPARED BY• P NG DIVISION PHONE: 639 -4171 Page 5 • • PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre - application conference is to: (1) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (2) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (3) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right -of -way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: 1) to increase abutting public rights -of -way to • the ultimate functional street classification right -of -way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or 2) for the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right -of- way dedication for: N, A • < t . I/ " _ J 1 . to feet from centerline. 2. to feet from centerline. 3. to feet from centerline. Street improvements: X/ 577u4 per. Hwy 1. street improvements will be necessary along 2. street improvements will be necessary along 3. Street improvements shall include . feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five -foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs,• streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street may be . deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non - remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of.a local improvement district formed to improve: 1. • 2. Page 6 • • Pedestrianways /bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's Water Supply: The Tigard Water District (Phone: 639 -1554) or the Tualatin Valley Water District (Phone: 642 -1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 645 - 8533) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. ∎— p/at gi te _ Other Agency Permits: OA) /qe %'et505' V ?We. Q/ Storm sewer improvements: STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90-43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on -site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility and/or the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. • v Odk - s/? GOA t. Cft44f ?7r tr TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based. • upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment, of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible Only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. Page 7 III • STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right -of -way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY- ' '��-' ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: 639 -4171 i RP:preapnon . Page 8 • • Staff VA Date CITY OF TIGARD • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your • application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639 -4171. ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: • A) Application form (1 copy) [rl 8) Owner's signature/written authorization (. C) Title transfer instrument [ �/ D) Assessor's map • [ '/ E) Plot or site plan [ a F) Applicant's statement [ ( - [ (H) Filing fee ($ ) [ SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Information showing (No. of copies !; ): [ ] 1) Vicinity Map _ ( TI/' 2) Site size & dimensions ( / 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10%) [ 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [ 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: a) Floodplain areas [ ] b) Slopes in excess of 25% [ ] c) Unstable ground [ ] d) Areas with high seasonal water table ( ] e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ ] f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ( ] 6) location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: a) Wildlife habitats [ ] b) Wetlands [ ] 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level [ 4 1;t, • 8) Location of existing structures and their uses • 9) Location and type of on and off -site noise sources 10) Location of existing utilities and easements [.V 11) Location of existing dedicated right -of - ways. [•] 8). Site Development Plan showing (No. of copies /6 ): [ ] 1) The proposed: site and surrounding properties - [ 2) Contour line intervals: ( 3) The location, dimensions and names of a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining [ properties • .. APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 1 1 . • b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. [ ] c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension [ ] 4) The location and dimension of: a) Entrances and exits on the site [„]� b) Parking and circulation areas [l c) Loading and services areas be d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation e) Outdoor common areas, f) Above ground utilities [ 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site ( b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [ te 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions [ y 7) Sanitary sewer facilities 8) The location of areas to be landscaped [.}/ 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [� 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation [ :7 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements [ C) Grading Plan (No. of copies ) [ ] The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. [ ] 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical _ engineering report [ ] b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals [ ] c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated // [ ] 0) Architectural Drawings (No.: of copies • ): ] The site development plan proposal shall. include: • 1) . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on -site; and • � �/ 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. • [ 7 r - • E) Landscape Plan (No.. of copies . / �• ): [ ] The landscape plan shall be drawn at the' same scale of the ...:. • site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [ ] 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings [ APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 2 • . • • 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas (' and common open spaces (✓ 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. [.//' The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. [ ] 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ ] F). Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or _'/ prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [ �!' G) Traffic generation estimate [ 3 H) Preliminary partition or lot line adjustment map showing (No. of Copies ): 1) The owner of the subject parcel [ ] 2) The owner's authorized agent [ ] 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north arrow and date [ ] 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ 3 5) Location, width and names of streets,.easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [ ] 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines [ 3 7) Location and width of all water courses ( ] 8) Location of any trees with or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level [ ] 9) All slopes greater than 25% [ ] 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [ ] 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right - of-way location and width ( ] b) A scaled cross- section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [ ] 12) Any applicable deed restrictions [ 3 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [ ] I) Subdivision Preliminary.Plat Map and data showing(No. of Copies ): 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch ' and limited to one phase per sheet [ ] 2) The proposed name of the subdivision [ ] 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets - 4) Names, addresses and.telephone.numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of application_ [ ] 6) Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided [ ] 7) Names of adjacent subdivision.or naves of recorded. owners of adjoining parcels of land [ ] . 8) Contour lines related to:-a City - established bench- mark at 2 -foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater • • • than 10% [ APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 3 • • 9) The purpose, location, type and size of all of the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): [ ] a) Public and private right -of -ways and easements [ ] b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines ( ] c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants 1 3 d) Major power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) [ ] e) Watercourses [ ] f) Deed reservations for parks, open space, pathways and other land encumbrances [ ] 10) Approximate plan and profiles of proposed sanitary and • storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated [ ] 11) Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants. [ ] 12) Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision. [ 3 13) Scaled cross sections of proposed street right -of -way; [ ] 14) The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow [ 3 15) Location, width and direction of flow of all water- courses and drainage ways [ ] 16) The proposed lot configurations, approx mate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where losts are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots [ ] 17) The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings, if any [ ] 18) The existing uses•of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement of which structures are to remain after platting [ 3 19) Supplemental information including: a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) [ 3 b) Proof of property ownership [ ] c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements [ ] 20) Existing natural features including rock out- croppings, wetlands and marsh areas. [ 3 • 21) If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be - incorporated into a narrative and submitted with the application. • [ ] 3) Other Information [ ] (2362P/0028P) APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 4 • NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS • 1. NPO NO. (2) copies _ CPO NO. 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS ,wilding Official /Dave S. _ Parka & Recreation Board Police City Recorder Field Operations X Engineering/Chris D. / Permits Facilitator/Viola 0. 3. SPECIAL DIS S Fire District School Dist No. 48 (Pick -up box) (Beaverton) Joy Pahl PO Box 200 Beaverton, OR 97075 Tigard Water District _ School Dist. 23J 8777 SW Burnham St. (Tigard) Tigard, OR 97223 13137 SW Pacific Hwy. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District Unified Sewerage Agency /SWM Program 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. 155 N. First St. Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro, OR 97124 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use a Transp. _ Boundary Commission 150 N. First Ave. 320 SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97204 Brent Curtis _ _ Kevin Martin _ METRO - GREENSPACES PROGRAM Mike Borresan Mel Huie (CPA's /ZOA'e) Scott King 600 NE Grand _ Fred Eberle Portland, OR 97232 -2736 _ DLCD (CPA's /ZOA's) City of Beaverton 1175 Court 8t. NE Jim Hendryx - Principal Planner Salem, OR 97310 -0590 PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 _ Other City of King City City of Durham City Manager City Manager 15300 SW 116th PO Box 23483 -3483 King City, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 City of Lake Oswego City of Portland City Manager - Planning Director 380 8W A 1120 3W 5th e Oswego, OR 97034 Portland, OR 97204 State Highway Division ODOT - Bob Doran Lidwien Rahmann PO Box 25412 9002 8E McLoughlin Blvd. Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Milwaukie, OR 97222 _ City of Tualatin PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES General Telephone Portland General Elec. I ./ Engineering Office - Brian Moore PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholia Fry. gard, OR 97281 -3416 Ti Beaverton, OK 97007 , L . NW Natural Gas Metro Area Communications Scott Palmer Jason Hewitt 220 NW Second Ave. Twin Oaks Technology Center Portland, OR 97209 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 _ TCI Cablevision of Oregon Mike Hallock US West 3500 SW Bond St. Pete Nelson Portland, OR 97201 421 SW Oak St. Portland, OR 97204 _ Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) 14200 8W Brigadoon Ct. Tri -Met Transit Dev. Beaverton, OR 97005 - Kim Knox 4012 SE 17th Ave. 6. STATE AGENCIES Portland, OR 97202 Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI Division of State Lands Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park OTHER -_ Fish a Wildlife PUC Dept. of Environ. Quality 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES _ Corps. of Engineers Post Office 8. OTHER _ Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 • 1S136DB -00600 1S136DB -00700 TYSON, ALFRED J ACKERLY COMMUNICATIONS OF THE LARSON, RAYMOND K NORTHWEST, INC 28275 NW DORLAND RD 3601 6TH AVE S HILLSBORO OR 97124 SEATTLE WA 98134 1S136DB -00800 1S136DB -00900 MORRIS, JOHN C DAISY E GENSMAN, MITCHELL EDWARD 11621 SW PACIFIC HWY 963 SW WESTWOOD DR TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 1S136DB -01000 1S136D8-01100 GENSMAN, LEE R & ALICE L SIMONSON, KATHRYN A % GENSMAN, MITCHELL E & DEBORAH 11005 SW 74TH 963 WESTWOOD TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 1S136DB -01200 1S136DB -01300 PATELZICK, JOHN J JR & CYNTHIA PARK, NORMAN EARL AND CHERYL MAE 10975 SW 74TH AVE 10945 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136DB -01400 1S136DB -01500 SMURTHWAITE, PAUL R & NORMA TRS DORRELL, DONAL V G DELMA 10915 SW 74TH 10885 SW 74TH AVE TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 1S136DB -01600 1S136DB -02400 DORRELL, DONAL N CHAMPION, RONALD V AND 10855 SW 74TH ROBERTA E TIGARD OR 97223 11642 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD OR 97223 1S136DB -02500 1S136DB -02501 PIERCE, GILBERT /GRACE ET AL WEBBER, JOHN & CARLA TACO BELL #1091 F 5452 SW 54TH AVE BY GEORGE HAMMERSMITH PORTLAND OR 97221 5989 SE JENNE LANE PORTLAND OR 97236 1S136CD -00101 1S136CD -01400 MCGRATH, STANLEY R TR & QAYUM, ABDUL AND ISMAT PEDERSEN, FRANCES TR ET AL 18245 RIVER EDGE CT 834 SW ST CLAIR LAKE OSWEGO OR 97034 PORTLAND OR 97205 1S136CD -01401 1S136CD -01500 JOHNSON, JULIE A LIFE ESTATE AND SCHULZ, DAVID TR RICHARDSON, BERNY KERR, GLORIA TR 36220 RESORT DR 14550 SW HAZELTREE TERR CLOVERDALE OR 97112 TIGARD OR 97224 1S136CA -00400 1S136CA -00500 VENIEGAS, EDILBERTO B AND HERDMAN, CYNTHIA M RUTH M 11030 SW 78TH AVE 10980 SW 78TH TIGARD OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97223 • • 1S136CA -00600 1S136CA -00700 ALSTOTT, BRIAN D WALKER, ELAINE A 11070 SW 78TH AVE 11130 SW 78TH TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CA -00702 1S136CA -00800 VOGT, PATRICIA R /PAUL J WEAVER, JAMES ANDREW AND 11100 SW 78TH AVE BETH ELEANOR TIGARD OR 97223 11160 SW 78TH DR TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CA -00900 1S136CA -01000 SLOAN, EUGENE E COX, TIMOTHY J II 11190 SW 78TH 11220 SW 78TH ST TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CA -01100 1S136CA -01200 SCHULTZ, RONALD M AND BRISSETT, GARY M & KIRSTEN E COLLEEN A 11280 SW 78TH 6041 SW CANBY TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97219 1S136CA -01300 1S136CA -01400 REED, TIMOTHY J & JENNIFER C LEE, BEN H LAURA M 7775 SW PFAFFLE ST 7745 SW PFAFFLE RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 1S136CA -01500 1S136CA -01501 HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES II HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES II PO BOX 389 PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 1S136CA -01502 1S136CA -01503 HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES II HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES II PO BOX 389 PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 1S136CA -01504 1S136CA -01505 HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES I AND HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES II HAWTHORNE VILLA ASSOCIATES II PO BOX 389 PO BOX 389 PALO ALTO CA 94302 PALO ALTO CA 94302 1S136CA -01600 1S136CA -01601 HALL, DONALD W & GRACE L AND HALL, DONALD W AND GRACE L HALL, JOHN G & PARKER, CAROL J HALL, JOHN G ET AL % AMAN, WALTER S & AMAN, WALTER L 1300 SW 5TH AVE #3009 PO BOX 19089 PORTLAND OR 97201 PORTLAND OR 97216 1S136CA -01700 1S136CA -01800 WATTS, KENNETH GILEBRT MILNE REAL PROPERTIES, INC PO BOX 230925 P 0 BOX 2740 TIGARD OR 97281 PORTLAND OR 97208 • • 110 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: ?e( tat-f , ,,',id DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: Li- e 7 NOTIFICATION LIST FOR ALL APPLICATIONS • i. CIT (2) copies CPO NO. 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS _ ✓ Building Official /Dave S. arks & F.ecreatic-. Board _ Police ity Recorder Field Operations gineering /Michael A. L — Permits Facilitator /Jerree G. Long Rar. - -e Piann'i-.g /Carol 1. SPECIAL DIST TS V Fire Di strict (pick -up box) Tigard Water Department _ 8777 S'.4 Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 _Tualatin Valley Water District t/ Unified Sewerage Agency /StM Program 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. 155 N. First St. Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro. OR 97:24 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. Boundary Commission 150 N. First Ave. 800 NE Oregon St. *16 Suite 540 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232 -2109 Brent Curtis _ Kevin Martin METRO - GREENSPAC?S PROGRAM _ Mike Borreson Mel Buie (CPA's /ZOA's) _ Scott King 600 NE Grand Fred Eberle Portland, OR 97232-2736 _ DLCD (CPA's / ZOA's, City of Beaverton 1175 Cour: St. NE ---- Jim Hendryx - Principal Planner Salem, OR 97310 -:590 PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076 _ Other _ City of King City City of :_rha.T City Manager City Mana_er 15300 SW 116th PO Box 22433 -3483 King City, OR 97224 Tigard, CR 97224 _ City of Lake Oswego City of Portland City Manager Planning Director 380 SW A 1120 SW 5 :h Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Portland. OR 97204 State Highway Division Bob Doran I Lt I vi � 6 I Q v i < PO Box 25412 9002 SE M:Loughlin Blvd. Portland, OR 97225 -0412 Milwaukie, OR 97222 City of ^_alatin PO Box 3:? Tualatin. OR 970.2 5. SPECIAL AGENCIES L Telephone Portland General Elec. Engineering Office Brian Moore PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Schoils Fry. Tigard, OR 97281 -3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 _ NW Natural Gas Metro Area Communications — Scott Palmer Jason Hewitt 220 NW Second Ave. Twin Oaks Technology Center Portland, OR 97209 • 1815 NW 169th Place 5 -6020 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 _ TCI Cablevision of Oregon Linda Peterson US West 3500 SW Bond St. Pete Nelson Portland, OR 97201 421 SW Oak St. Por land, OR 97204 Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct. Tri -Met Transit Lev. Beaverton, OR 97005 — Kim Knox 710 NE Holladay Sc. 6. STATE AGENCIES Portland, OR 97232 _ Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI _ Division of State Lands Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park OTHER Fish & Wildlife — PUC Dept. of Environ. Quality 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Post Office 8. OTHER _ Southern Pacific Transportation Company • Duane M. Forney. PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue, R. 324, Union Station - Portland, OR 97209 S�l� 1 • . 41I • April 28, 1997 • Henry S. Raz, President CITY OF TIGARD Raz Transportation Company OREGON 1660 SW Bertha Boulevard Portland, OR 97219 Re: Director's Interpretation of Non - Conforming Use Status Dear Mr. Raz: This letter is in response to your request for a Director's Interpretation of the non - conforming use status for the property located at 11655 SW Pacific Highway in the City of Tigard. This has been requested because the site presently has a split zoning designation. Approximately one - half of the southern portion of the property is zoned General Commercial (C -G) in both Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations. The northern half of the property has a Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (6 -12 dwelling units per acre) and an R -12 residential Zoning designation. Presently, the property is being used for bus shuttle service providers and for construction contractor uses. Raz Transportation has proposed to become the sole bus service provider from the existing facility and intends to continue to use portions of the property that are presently zoned for residential use. Upon review of the historic use overview of the property and a site inspection of the current property improvements, the proposed non - conforming uses of the commercial and residential portions of the property are in compliance with the non - conforming provisions of the Community Development Code. These provisions are set forth in Section 18.132.040(B)(1)(a -f) of the Community Development Code. The standards have been addressed as indicated below: a. No such non - conforming use is enlarged, increased, or extended to occupy a greater area of land or space than was occupied at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this title. The proposed bus shuttle service use does not appear to increase the intensity of the heavy equipment type uses that have taken place on the property since 1944. b. No such non - conforming use shall be moved in whole or in part to any portion of the lot other than that occupied by such use at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this title. The entire site has apparently been utilized for this purpose or other heavy equipment uses since 1944. The property was annexed to the City in 1987 and since that time, the non - conforming uses have continued. c. The non - conforming use of land is not discontinued for any reason for a period of more than 6 months. This non - conforming status request does not involve the use of a non - conforming structure. The existing structure on the General Commercial zoned portion of the property accommodates permitted office and related storage uses. The remainder of this property is undeveloped. Page 1 of 2 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 • 1 • d. If the use is discontinued or abandoned for any reason for a period of six months, any subsequent use of land shall conform to the regulations specified by this title for the zone in which such land is located. At such time as the use is discontinued, • this standard will then apply. Based on the use history that has been provided for the site, the property has apparently been in constant use by the non - conforming land uses prior to annexation of the property to the City of Tigard in 1987. e. For purposes of this section, a use is discontinued or abandoned upon the occurrence of the first of any of the following events: (i) on the date when the land was vacated; (ii) on the date the use ceases to be actively involved in the sale of merchandise or the provision of services; (iii) on the date of termination of any lease or contract under which the non- conforming; or (iv) on the date a request for final reading of water and power meters is made to the applicable utility districts. When any of the following events has occurred, the current non - conforming use status will no longer apply to the site and it will then be required to be developed to current City Development Code Standards of the zoning district. • f. No additional structure, building, or sign shall be constructed on the lot in connection with such non - conforming use of land. Through the determination of this use status, no structures are proposed to be constructed on the property. The heavy equipment uses on the property have not been discontinued for any six (6) month period since 1944. As provided in Section 18.32.310(A) of the Community Development Code, you may appeal this decision within ten (10) days from the date of issuance of the decision. - Please feel free to contact me conceming this information or if you have any other questions. Sincerely, /4f c • James N.P. Hendryx Community Development Director i:lcurpin\mark_rlrazl .doc c: Mr. Art Luckett 1997 Correspondence File SDR 94 -0017 Land Use File Page 2 of 2 • 1 / lSIM& /MINIM AIM IMMO/ / I -_ - - - / - - - - - 1 = Y -- - - / /- N- /' TRANSPORTATION / COMPANY 1660 SW BERTHA BLVD. PORTLAND, OR 97219 (503) 246 -3301 (800) 666 -3301 FAX (503) 246 -9791 • April 4, 1997 To Whom It May Concern: RAZ Transportation Company will be moving its operations to 11655 S.W. Pacific Highway, Tigard, Oregon, 97223. In 1944, Hall Construction built that facility for their offices and shop for their heavy construction business. Hall Construction later joined with four other companies to continue to provide heavy construction (particularly road and dam building). One of those companies, Mellow Trucking, continued to operate from that site until it was turned over to Appolo Bus Company for tour and charter bus service. The site continued to facilitate additional tour and charter bus companies (N.W. Tours and Pacific Tours) as well as RAZ Transpor- tation until this date. RAZ Transportation will now be the sole tenant providing bus service from that site. Sincerely, RAZ TRANSPORTATION COMPANY y S. President Mtn® Member , NATIONA L TOUR B k 88OCIATION, INC. A • ASSOCIATION • • PAGE TWO - THE FOLLOWING IS: • A CHRONOLOGICAL DETAIL OF THE ATTACHED COVER LETTER, TO THE TIME FRAMES OF EACH OF THE OCCUPANTS OF THIS PROPERTY, FOR OVER THE PAST 50 PLUS YEARS. FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME - JULY 1944 THRU JUNE 1995: THE HULL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A MAJOR ROAD AND DAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. THEY BUILT A PORTION OF THE I -5 CORRIDOR, JOHN DAY DAM, AND THE McNARY DAM. THEY STAGED THEIR HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND ROAD EQUIPMENT AT THIS LOCATION. THIS WAS THE CENTRAL OFFICE, SERVICE AND REPAIR CENTER, FOR ALL OF THEIR OPERATIONS DURING THIS TIME FRAME. DURING THIS TIME, THEY WERE A PART OF OVER 150 PIECES OF HEAVY OR ROAD EQUIPMENT THAT WAS STAGED, DISPATCHED, SERVICE, REPAIRED, OR STORED AT THIS LOCATION. MOST OF THIS EQUIPMENT WAS IN THE YARD DURING THE WINTER MONTHS. WHEN THIS FACILITY WAS ORIGINALLY BUILT, IT WAS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE AREA WAS ZONED FOR INDUSTRIAL USE. THIS DOES SOUND LOGICAL, OR THE FACILITY, OR THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY, WOULD OF NOT BEEN ALLOUD, AT THAT TIME. FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME -1950 THRU PRESENT: THE AMEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, WITH IT'S PEOPLE AND EQUIPMENT, WERE ON THE SAME PROPERTY, AND WORKED ON SOME OF THE SAME PROJECTS WITH HULL. THEY ALSO STAGED, DISPATCHED, SERVICED, REPAIRED, OR STORED THEIR EQUIPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY, DURING THIS TIME FRAME. THEY WERE A PART OF THE 150 PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, WORKING FROM THAT LOCATION. FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME -1970 THRU 1980: MELLOW TRUCKING COMPANY, WITH AN ADDITIONAL 70 PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, AVERAGED, RUN A LOCAL AND LONG HAUL FREIGHT COMPANY AT THIS LOCATION. THEY OPERATED A FREIGHT TERMINAL, DISPATCH, STAGING AREA, SERVICE AND REPAIR CENTER, FROM THIS FACILITY. THIS WAS A VERY BUSY AREA, DURING THIS TIME. • • PAGE THREE: FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME - FEB. 1979 THRU MARCH 1993: APOLLO BUS /TRANSPORTATION AND TOURING COMPANY, ALSO OCCUPIED THIS FACILITY DURING THE ABOVE TIME. THEY OPERATED, STAGED, SERVICED, REPAIRED, AND DISPATCHED OVER 125 STAGES/BUSES, THROUGH THIS FACILITY, DURING THE ABOVE TIME FRAME. FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME - AUG. 1992 THRU DEC. 1996: NORTHWEST TOURS, BUS, AND STAGES, ALSO OCCUPIED THIS FACILITY DURING THE ABOVE TIME. THEY OPERATED, STAGED, SERVICED, REPAIRED, AND DISPATCHED OVER 100 BUS /STAGE UNITS, THROUGH THIS FACILITY, DURING THE ABOVE TIME FRAME. FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME -1993 THRU OCT. 1996: A SPIN OFF OF NORTHWEST TOURS, MADE A TRANSITION TO PACIFIC TRAILS TOURING BUS SERVICE. OVER 100 BUS STAGES WERE IN SERVICE, FOR THIS PORTION OF THE USE OF THE PROPERTY. THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF BUSES IN SERVICE DURING THIS TIME, WAS OVER 125 TO 150, FOR THE ABOVE TWO COMBINED COMPANIES, THROUGH AND AFTER THE TRANSITION PERIOD. FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME - MARCH 1994 THRU PRESENT: RYSON GUNITE AND CONSTRUCTION CO., A SPIN OFF OF AMEN CONSTRUCTION CO. THEY HAVE DONE THE SAME CONSTRUCTION WORK, WITH THEIR 40 PIECES OF EQUIPMENT, DURING THE ABOVE TIME FRAME. FOR THE PERIOD OF TIME - FEB. 1994 THRU PRESENT: RAZ TRANSPORTATION CO. HAS STAGED, SERVICED, REPAIRED, DISPATCHED, PARKED BUSES ON THIS PROPERTY DURING THIS PERIOD OF TIME. THEY REQUEST TO CONTINUE TO CARRY ON THE SAME TYPE OF BUS SERVICE, THAT HAS BEEN OPERATING ON THIS PROPERTY FOR THE PAST EIGHTEEN YEARS. THEY NOW WISH TO MOVE THEIR GENERAL OFFICES TO THIS LOCATION. THE EXISTING LARGE CONCRETE BUILDING WILL CONTINUE AS A COMBINATION OFFICE AND SHOP FACILITY, AS IT HAS IN THE PAST, SINCE 1944. THEY ESTIMATE THAT THE SAME NUMBER OF BUSES WILL BE USED, AS HAS BEEN IN THE PAST. THAT BEING APPROXIMATELY 125 UNITS. THESE UNITS ARE OFF OF THE • • PAGE FOUR: PROPERTY A GREAT DEAL OF THE TIME, DOING THEIR ASSIGNED PROJECTS. THE PEOPLE AND EQUIPMENT LOADING OF THIS PROPERTY WILL BE FAR LESS THEN IN THE VERY EARLY YEARS. HOWEVER, WE DO EXPECT TO SEE THE PEOPLE AND EQUIPMENT LOADING, ON THIS PROPERTY, TO BE THE SAME AS IT HAS BEEN SINCE THE 1979 START, AND THROUGH THE FOLLOWING YEARS, OF THE BUS OPERATIONS ON THIS PROPERTY. A SMALL PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS WILL ALSO BE ON THE PROPERTY, AS IT HAS BEEN SINCE 1944. WE WISH TO. THANK YOU FOR THE ASSISTANCE THAT YOU HAVE GIVEN SO WELL. PLEASE ADVISE IF WE MAY BE OF FUTHER ASSISTANCE, IN HELPING YOU APPROVE OUR REQUEST. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTEE; T RO Y TON RA TRANSPORTATION CO. • • AGREEMENT WITH DEPOSITOR AND BANK ON SAVINGS OR DEPOSIT This agreement is for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of S.w 6969 S.W. Hampton Lanscaping Improvement Compliance Agreement, dated March 11, 1996 between the City of Tigard and Peterson Kolberg & Assoc. and is entered into by the Depositor Peterson:Kolberg & Assoc. and Bank of America Depository /Bank. The undersigned depositor and bank do hereby assign the right to the City of Tigard to determine at its discretion the payment of all funds or securities held by Bank in the amount of $7,000.00 in Savings Account No. d J// -7755 in accordance with and for the purpose of assuring Improvements described in the above stated Landscaping Improvement Compliance Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the Bank will hold such funds or securities in the amount of $7,000.00 until an authorization or direction for payment or partial payment is received from the City of Tigard and that the City of Tigard has the right to withdraw Principal Funds with City of Tigard s4gnature only, in the event of Non - performance. All fund deposits shall be renewable at maturity and at rates and terms in effect at the time of renewal, and all interest shall be paid to or accrued as directed by the Depositor notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary. That account is to remain open until such time as all Public Improvements are completed and accepted by the City of Tigard. Signed and dated at I ,p,�v d ,Oregon. This 1 1 day of 0,14-!,, , 1996. Signature - City'of Tigard Signature f Depo - Peterson Kolberg S oc. 13125 S. W. Hall Blvd. 29781 Town Tigard, OR 97223 Center Loop West Wilsonville, OR 97070 ACCEPTANCE The undersigned hereby accepts the funds or securities deposited in the amount of $7,000.00 this 11 day of March, 1996, and hereby acknowledges receipt of the Savings Account No. 511 - P175 or certifies th t there is no Passbook issued for this account. It is further agreed that..said account. ill be held for the uses and purposes. =above stated until authorisation f 4:ii,slogosition is gran by the City of Tigard. 7 r • • Altermatt Associates Consultants in Acoustics October 14, 1994 Aman Enterprises, Inc. P.O. Box 19089 Portland, OR 97282 Attn: Mr. Walt Aman Re: Site Noise Study for: Proposed Commercial Building Project 94112 11655 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97280 Dear Mr. Arran: At your request, and in coordination with Mr. John Bradford, the Structural Engineer, a noise study was accomplished for the referenced project. The study was undertaken to accomplish requirements of the City of Tigard, Notice of Decision -Site Development Review SDR 94 -0017 (SDR). Specifically the study was to "address the impacts of the loading dock on the noise sensitive areas" surrounding the project. This letter summarizes all measurements analyses and recommendations of the study. 1. Site Description and Operation 1.1 The project site is located at 11655 S.W. Pacific Highway in Tigard, Oregon (see Figure 1). It is set back north of S.W. Pacific Highway, behind an existing bank building. The property currently includes one commercial /light industrial building and undeveloped land extending north of the existing building approximately 800 feet (see Figure 2). The property is 300 feet wide. The northern 470'x300' of the undeveloped portion is currently zoned residential. The Hawthorne Villa apartment occupy the property directly west, with the closest building approximately 230 feet from the loading dock. The Sleepy Hollow apartments at 10900 S.W. 98th Place to are directly north of the undeveloped land, approximately 495 feet from the loading dock. The property to the east is zoned residential, but is residential except for one structure at 11645 S.W. Pacific Highway which is approximately 190 feet from the loading dock. Directly to the east of the existing site building is an automotive repair shop with a parking lot on its north side. 1.2 The user of the project site is to be Aman Enterprises, Inc., a sales, service and installation company of primarily swimming pool, spa and related materials and equipment. The loading dock operation varies seasonally. Trucks will normally 94112.LET 1 6745 S.W. 13th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97219 (503) 245 -1680 Fax: 245 -1743 • • Walt Aman October 14, 1994 drive in and toward the northeast corner of the property and back into the loading dock. When leaving, they will drive directly out of the yard. The company operates its own 6 wheel vans for local delivery, and ships or receives freight from primarily short -haul carriers with 6 wheel vans, and 10 or 14 wheel tractor - trailers. Truck density has been estimated at 2 -4 per day, with the 3:00 -5:00 pm hours being the most likely for truck arrival with a maximum of 3 in one hour. No trucks arrive before 9:00 am, and the operation closes, including the loading dock, at 5:00 pm each day. Occasionally (10 -12 times per year), 18 wheel semi trucks will arrive with larger shipments. This should never occur more than once in a day. Trucks are loaded and unloaded using small propane lift trucks. During loading /unloading, the overhead loading dock door to the warehouse will be open. No noise sources of greater significance are expected within the warehouse. 2. Noise Descriptors 2.1 Human response to sound is a function of the magnitude of a sound, the frequency spectrum of the sound (the pitch of the sound), the duration of the sound and the time when it occurs. It is difficult to describe a sound with a single number because of all these parameters that influence human response. 2.2 The A- weighting network of a sound measuring instrument adjusts the indicated overall sound pressure level in much the same manner that the human ear responds to sound at different frequencies. Thus the A- weighted sound level (read as "dBA ") becomes a single number that defines the level of a sound with some indication as to the human response to that sound. 2.3 The A- weighted sound level alone is not sufficient to describe the noise environment at any given location because environmental sound levels tend to constantly change with time. Therefore, an environmental noise descriptor needs to address the length of time sound is present as well as the level of the sound. One environmental noise descriptor used widely throughout the United States is the "Statistical Sound Level ". The statistical sound level is generally given in terms of the level exceeded a percentage of time during a specified time period" and read "LXX ". For example, the L50 would be that .level exceeded 50% of the time during a specified time period. usually, the specifiethtime period is one hour in most regulations and standards. 2.4 Subjectively, an increase in sound level of 1 dBA is not perceptible by most people and would be judged insignificant. An increase of 3 dBA would be perceptible by most people, and an increase of 10 dBA would generally be judged as twice as loud. A listing of noise levels of common sources is provided in the enclosed table for reference. 94 LET 2 • • Walt Aman October 14, 1994 3. Criteria 3.1 The defining criteria, as indicated in the SDR are the noise limits set forth by the (Oregon) Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) as these regulations have also been adopted by the City of Tigard (Chapter 7.40.130 -200). These regulations are found in Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 340, Division 35. The DEQ provides limits for daytime and nighttime hours and for new commercial /industrial uses to be located on property previously unused by commercial /industrial facilities. Since the proposed site currently is occupied by a Tight industrial use, the pertinent portion of the regulations for this project are the noise limits for the proposed hours of operation. This portion of the regulations reads in part: 340 -35 -035, A,(i): No person owning or controlling a new industrial or commercial noise source located on a previously used industrial or commercial site shall cause or permit the operation of that noise source during the hours between 7 am and 10 pm if the statistical noise levels generated by that new noise source, and measured at an appropriate measurement point, specified in subsection 340 -35 -035 (3) (b), exceed the levels of L50 of 55 dBA, and L10 of 60 dBA or and Ll of 75 dBA. 3.2 The "appropriate noise measurement point" is the property line or a point 25 feet from the noise sensitive dwelling, whichever is further from the noise source. Noise sensitive property includes real property normally used for sleeping, or normally used as schools, churches, hospitals, or public libraries. 4. Noise Measurements 4.1 Measurement Procedure 4.1.1 Noise level measurements were made at the project site on October 13, 1994 and at the current location of the operations of the proposed project occupant on October 11 and 12, 1994. 4.1.2 Noise levels were measured using a Quest Technologies Model 1800 Precision Integrating Sound Level Meter which meets American National Standards Institute (ANSI) requirements for a Type 1 sound level meter. The detector of the meter was set for Fast response.'.The microphone was approximately 5' above the ground. The meter had a built -in microprocessor and memory capability that allowed calculations and storage of a variety of statistical data. Of importance to this project were the previously mentioned Leq and Ln levels or noise levels equaled or exceed n% of a given hour, including the L50, L10 and Ll (per DEQ noise criteria). Weather conditions for all measurements included dry streets and winds less than 5 mph. The sound level meter was field calibrated prior to each measurement. 94112.LET 3 • • Walt Aman October 14, 1994 4.2 Existing Site Noise Level A measurement of the general site noise level was conducted on October 13, 1994. The measurement position was along the west property line of the project site as indicated on Figure 2. This position represents the existing noise levels of the noise sensitive property (Hawthorne Villa apartments) closest to the project. Measurements were made over a 15 minute period beginning at 3 pm. The measured noise levels were an L50 of 53 dBA, and L10 of 57 dBA, and an L1 of 63 dBA. Dominant sources included traffic on Pacific Highway and motor vehicles on the gravel parking area of the current user of the project site, and on the apartment parking lot. 4.3 Proposed Tenant Operation Noise Levels 4.3.1 The noise levels of the loading dock operation of Aman Enterprises, Inc., located at 14285 S.E. 98th Ct. in,Clackamas, Oregon, were monitored on October 11 and 12, 1994, between 4:00 and 5:15 pm. Measurements were made approximately 12 feet from most sources at the loading dock in order to obtain useful data with noise levels higher than the ambient levels of the surrounding industrial properties and the 1 -205 freeway. Generally, this ambient level was 45 -50 dBA on October 11 and 40 -45 dBA on October 12. On each day, the noise levels were monitored over a one hour period. Noise sources producing the loading dock levels included a small, propane powered lift truck, the engine of the freight trucks, and general transient noises associated with a loading dock. 4.3.2 On October 11, the measured levels were L50 of 51 dBA, L10 of 58 dBA and LI of 70 dBA. During this period, only one truck (6 wheel van) arrived for loading. It left within 10 minutes of arrival. The truck engine was not operated while loading. The higher L50 on this day, compared to October 12, reflects the higher ambient sound levels of other properties surrounding the site. 4.3.3 On October 12, the measured levels were L50 of 46 dBA, L10 of 66 dBA and LI of 72 dBA. During this period, two freight trucks arrived (each 10 wheel, tractor - trailers). Both trucks were on site approximately 12 minutes (not at the same time). Neither truck operated its engine during loading. This measurement was estimated to be close to the typical busy hour operation of the loading dock. The higher Ll0 and L1 levels, compared to those of October 11, reflect the additional size and number of trucks. 5. Analysis 5.1 As stated in 4.3.1 above, the loading dock operations were measured at a distance of approximately 12 feet from the sources for the majority of the time. This included 94112.LET 4 •n • • Walt Aman October 14, 1994 passby arrival and departure of the freight trucks. At times, the sound level meter was moved in order to facilitate this measure. In so doing, it is felt that the measurement gives a good indication of the variety of levels expected at the loading dock from a distance of 12 feet. Therefore, taking account for attenuation over distance, the measured levels can be used to indicate the expected future noise levels of the same operation at the noise sensitive property. 5.2 The west property line is 147 feet from the front corner of the proposed building where the loading dock will be located. the closest apartment is approximately 84 feet farther to the west (see Figure 2). The DEQ, noise sensitive property, measurement point would be 25 feet from the apartment or 180 feet from the front corner of the proposed building. The attenuation from 12 to 180 feet is 23 dBA. Applying this reduction to the loading dock levels measured on October 12, the resulting predicted levels at the Hawthorne Villa apartments are L50 of 23 dBA, Ll0 of 43 dBA and L1 of 49 dBA, well below DEQ limits. Further, the noise sensitive property to the west is at least partially shielded from the majority of loading dock - specific noise by the warehouse building itself. This will have a further attenuation effect of 5 -10 dBA. 5.3 The potential noise sensitive dwelling to the northeast is also so located to result in a distance to the noise sensitive property measurement site of 180 feet. However, at this location, reflections could occur from the face of the new building and the side of the existing building. Overall, the attenuation for this location would be 20 dB. In applying this reduction to the same loading dock levels, the resulting predicted noise levels at the off the northeast corner of the project site are L50 of 26 dBA, L10 of 46 dBA and L1 of 52 dBA, again, well below DEQ Limits. For this noise sensitive property, noise levels will be slightly higher than this due to the freight trucks arriving and driving toward the northeast corner of the project freight yard before backing into the loading dock. The far northeast corner is 80 feet from the northeast dwelling and 55 feet from what would be a noise sensitive property measurement point. The levels generated by this maneuver should occur very briefly, and should not exceed 75 dBA at maximum. In consideration of the number of trucks expected in one hour, the L1 limit of 75 dBA should never be exceeded, and probably will never be approached. 5.4 It is possible, as described earlier, that occasionally another truck (3 total in one hour) would use the loading dock. In such a case, the Ll0 and L1 levels may rise slightly. The L50 should stay about the same due to the overall short periods of operation of the louder sources, i.e. truck engine, loading transients, operation of overhead freight door of truck, etc. Arrival of any 18 wheel "semi" truck should never occur more than once in any given day. Again, the L1 and L10 levels may rise slightly from those predicted above for this event. This would be due only to the truck engine and 94112. LET 5 • • Walt Aman October 14, 1994 possibly the air brake depressurization. 6. Conclusions 6.1 The operation of the proposed loading dock is expected to generally produce lower noise levels than those measured at the closest noise sensitive property, Hawthorne Villa apartments. All levels should be within DEQ regulations without further mitigation measures and substantially so for the vast majority of the time. 6.2 The existing Sleepy Hollow apartments to the north should experience lower levels by 8 dBA or more. 6.3 The currently residential zoned, undeveloped land portion of the project property not proposed for development does not come under regulation by the DEQ because there is no dwelling on it. However, you should be aware that if this property is indeed later developed, the project operation would have to meet the DEQ noise regulations at all such developed noise sensitive property locations. 6.4 On the other hand, application could be made in the future (if conditions still warrant) for exception to the requirements of the regulation in the future per OAR 340 -35 -035 (6) for either: 1. An industrial or commercial noise source whose statistical noise levels at the appropriate measurement point are exceeded by any noise source external to the industrial or commercial noise source in question. Currently, the existing traffic noise levels in the area may exceed the statistical levels of the project. or 2. Noise Sensitive property owned or controlled by the person who owns or controls the noise source. Such an application, however, does not assure acceptance. Additionally, since the DEQ does not currently staff a noise department, the administration of such an application would most likely be through the City of Tigard. 94112.LET 6 • • Walt Aman October 14, 1994 If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely ALTERMATT ASSOCIATES Russell N. Altermatt, P.E. Principal 94112. LET 7 TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS A- weighted sound levels for typical noises, along with corresponding judgements of loudness dBA EXTERIOR NOISE INDUSTRY OR COMMERCIAL RELATIVE LOUDNESS 140 Threshold of pain 120 Commercial Jet at Takeoff Oxygen Torch 32 times as loud 110 _ Threshold of physical sensation Riveting Machine, Discotheque 16 times as loud • 100 Jet Flyover @ 1000 ft Textile Mill, Newspaper Press 8 times as loud 95 Power Mower Jack Hammer @ 50 ft 6 times as loud 90 Motorcycle @ 25 ft, Printing Press Plant, Boiler Room 4 times as loud 85 Diesel Truck(40 mph) @ 50 ft Pneumatic Drill @ 50 ft 3 times as loud 80 Downtown Urban Ambient Concrete Mixer @ 50 ft 2 times as loud 70 Mechanical Cash Register @ 10 ft REFERENCE LOUDNESS 65 Automobile (55 mph) @ 90 ft Electric Typewriter @ 10 ft. Large Office, Large Store 60 Urban Ambient; Normal Small Store, Small Office 1/2 times as loud Conversation @ 3 ft. 55 Suburban Ambient; Large Transformer @ 50 ft. 50 Quiet Suburban Ambient 1/4 times as loud 45 Rural Residence, Bird calls • 40 Classrooms, Lecture Halls, Lower 1/8 times as loud limit urban interior 35 Dance Studios, Music Practice Rooms Lower limit rural interior 30 Soft whisper Music Listening Studios, Theaters 1/16 times as loud 25 Rustling Leaves Concert Hall, Recording Studio 0 Threshold of hearing, youths • • • .,, SNILUCUST_31 w , SWMAELE LEAF S1 • • SW OAK ST Q q q, 2 SW PINE ST c coo i SW SPRUCE ST __ SW� .1 SW - I r sa r S S LsT i, 1 w W I 1 Q Z � 4 *( ?7> i n yr 3 r3 \ le . r 5 i ■ 0\ 1.16 S ( VICI VICINITY MAP NITY SCALE FIGURE__ J. • • 11 1 • (8) vices o B' -B (6) m< zs a 6' -B' I w•as • e - 6 (r; vas • e' -e• pn y • B-o- 9 l 1fe45 EXISTING CHUB • 1 ONA Y ro _ T� 0 E BE RENO • A5T1wc COUwERO ..c EDGE Cr ' BAR (. y �CE i0 RWAW _ I MEW 6 w UNE REw PANNC / _ _ _ _ - Ens RXEM / Ar ` y 9 • • . _ • NEW S ORN 1 7.141 QSSNG�. • • -� __—*L.• ' 1NEW FM. • PR[\EN _ . ���.a.a:ar,c■� w ��� ., i[. D , milk v r6K TS t `.- - - • . • ARE O _.- TYPICAL • A C P %1NG , i < ` • L '•�� ,�� �;- MO TREES OR SK.NS • A • • I k 0 /C •PAVW '•. ...• , TING k To . f•• aEMT. PALING • o_ �• t ..• REYOV E70STOtC N/C 6AYp • f '7. • 1 - .� g Imo %�y raUep. - q ET<iRY � R 6 , 6 . a'4 V • " if6S E M7DNG BU0.0P1G /D •1 / , (S u71011W)•t `' • .. ., ,:_q_ 77 S SW PAcmc WG7nwAr \ / EXIST. C9. Y 1 \ / �I �� a.m0eo Al 11 � R I (2)'1ORY a' GS YETpt \ • 8/ II'• n5 • 4 ' DTOT E a. 1OD•- 0•IOrT,CIIARE .18 EM TWG EXISTING ". S : 1 SPW D I /\ • z - L� ..--=g,---.1:i- V-41 CY TYPE O c Ns a / ■ pjpy BANK WADING Undeveloped - - �..- �_ ° '°'GD,,,, `°"s'RU`"q" I —r - "" �C ' ++ ro REUAc, / g.8 � ERis'•VC Eu.R .� } NEW Rau-UP ... • mil 7, ____i. . I : REw WR0R CER ' R[w t1RE MJ °' • • • VALVES O 16t EXISTWC 2 BUL OWG W 711 I DOORS O Z LOADING DOCK N E <.r• a. aA t. r [ < '+ ROIl -uP • • t3 _ : P R OP03E0 OIADWG 1 37.029 • . �R 1 r 6 So. ET. - TOT RN FLOOR EL. 102• -0• 3 < . ^ N =1 Isi b . Sleepy Hollow LAWOOIG 0 EXIT T75 6 I S ;;• ^ i< 1 DOOR - - _ - - Apts 4 701 "1 1 • O I ROIL -UP -- cm,{: i•••.... '^. EXIT 1 N ,• ttwc Nc - - -- - ■ ■ - - _ _ _ _ 1 NEW LANDSCAPE MATER : I ' • Noise ! 1 w acPLAa GNAW LWK «NEE j, • - - - - - - - - ^O • W — - - - - — - - NEW +oco TpNtE 2E e , cc Measurement j no * 295 ( 9L+Wv C_ f �o in Site r- 350.0 I I I 1 APT'S 1 • • FIGURE 2 Site Orientation AL BRADFORD", . • CONRAD CROW ENGINEERING CO. G CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS September 30, 1994 Mark Burrows Plans Examiner City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 • RE: Plan Check #7 -62C' AKA Business Services 11655 SW Pacific Hwy RESPONSE TO SDR 94 -0017 and PHONE PLAN CHECK OF 9/22/94 The issues of the site development review SDR 94 -0017 have been addressed in the attached revised plans submitted herewith. Also, those items which you phoned me about on Thursday, Sept. 22, 1994, are also addressed. Item by item of the SDR list: 1. Revised; 2. Yet to be obtained; 3. Revised; 4. This was submitted earlier; 5. See calculations for storm water retention submitted earlier; 6. The owner has opted to pay fee. 7. The site and landscape plans have been altered to comply as noted below: a. They are already shown on the landscape plan - see schedule for symbol. Eight new trees are being added in the island and three existing trees exist on the south side of the building. Other ree �xi t alonng ditch but are not individually identified; r l � 7 b. Increased from eight to ten based on 66 parking spaces; o /U /Vry c. Changed to provide 65 five gallon. Seven new trees provided. One large oak tree exists and will remain. Chain link fence replace with a new wood fence. See detail 10/1.4; Off PRISA, 7'o // 9 d. For 66 spaces, only three required; 634T' iiviei /a. /I q e. Noise study not yet complete; g 41 ' 1,1 0 U^ u 1 4e�ra f. Five minimum rack provided; a IC �u�� to/1( �l g. A new.4 ft walk provided on west side of driveway; 01< /0 //4 </ h. Owner is preparing. Will be submitted by owner; sJI l i .�,.e.ehd M ,�.y eequ1YQ. J7 O/ &4 0' i. See revised site plan. We have increased the parking from 53 /to 66 •plc spaces. The retail area is for display of large bulk merchandise items - specifically hot tubs and swimming pools. The nature of this business will not generate large numbers of customers at one time. We therefore 10180 SW NIMBUS AVENUE • SUITE J3 • TIGARD, OR 97223 -4306 • PH (503) 639 -6601 • FAX (503) 639 -6251 Mark Burrows, City of Tigard pg 2 September 14, 1994 ` Plan Check Response dat8/16/94 • feel that a ratio of 1:1000 is more than adequate. Also, the total numbers of employees for the entire facility - retail, office and warehouse will be on the order of 15 people. The 66 spaces will be more than sufficient; C,I< 1Mp�le, 1 e ? /I ( /44/ 8. ok 9. I assume you pass the plans on the fire marshal. Please advise if we are to do this; 10. See note on site plan. Items from our phone conversation on 9/22/94: 1. Item 14 of first plan check: Changed handrail to 1" dia. std pipe (1.315" OD). Extended one rail 23" at bottom and 12" at top at each stair and ramp. See floor plan and details on sheet 6.2. 2. Item 15 from first plan check: Hand rail provided on both sides of all ramps and stairs. A curb has been provided along the outside of the exterior ramp; 3. Item 22 from first plan check: ramp landing dimensions changed to 6' -0" at all locations; 4. Item 25 from first plan check: Roof insulation changed to R15. See sheet 2.2. NOTE: In order to provide space for additional site details on sheet 1.4, we moved the rest room details to a new sheet No. 3.1. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, BRADFORD CWAD CROW ENGINEERING. i .- John F. Bradford, P President Enclosures: Revised sheets 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0, 3.1, 6.2, 6.3 BRADFORD LETTER Eli TRANSMITTAL CONRAD PH (6031839 -8601 CROW ENOINEERINGl CO. FAX (803) 639 -8261 G 10180 RD SW R 97 NIMBU22 S AVE. SUITE J3 , O Dote: 11/01/94 Our Job No: 93437 T0: City Of Tigard WE ARE SENDING THE FOLLOWING: Prints for Construction ATTN: Mark Roberts Prints for Your Review /Approval Revised Prints (Destroy Previous Copy) Prints for Bid Use (Return With Bid) RE: Si to Noi se Study For Reference Only Proposed Cnmmerci al Rid 1 i dng Preliminary Prints Tigard, OR Other: Specifications: COPIES DRAWING NUMBER REV DESCRIPTION /TITLE 1 EA STTF NOTSF STUDY (dated 18/14/94) 18 pages -- ,.. -, ,--t c 1:,- ( a+ _,,f .,',, /),_;14„ ,, i';,,,1.5, .i «Q11 4) ti- 1994 cOMMUNtN IEVELOPMENI I D r4 )U: lO0 a hi -�.yl, .�. (- tc-vi, 14;7 ., -�_ X en1 j7 ' lit z / � ,e� 4-i2 / i ,i Pai- a - Y11" W i (q ( �-P. / iliAece . ) 1 r"'e 5 ) rhl C pi, a REMARKS: HAND CARRIED TO CITY OF TIGARD BY JOHN BRADFORD COPY TO: SENDER: John Bradford ( (1‘ If Enclosures Are Not As Noted, Kindly Notify Us At Once. • • COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal TT 8002 P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684 -0360 Notice BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising RECEIVED • Ci ty of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall BlVd. SEP 2 0 1994 •Tigard,Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit CITY OF TIGARD • • : 7 :y i % Tr1L AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION \ `t`.Ir I T cr STATE OF OREGON, ) , .. ) -1t COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) ss. „ eln I, Kathy Snyder 1:':.1w "'" being first duly sworn, depose and say. thaatrd the Adv in sr T' mes c�'S Director, or his principal clerk, of the q -t a newspaper of general circulatiqn as defined in ORS 193.010 r .,s' '. - - and 193.020; published at Tigard in the ,- .11)1 aforesaid count and state; that the (4 Maps ) Site Develop. 94 - 0017 AMAN MT,P 94 — nn15 .i9 _ontn a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the 2 rL z1 entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and . consecutive in the following issues: September 15,1994 ff6t).11A ildy.x.. Subscribed and sworn t ore me thi - - s • - • p - • emb , y' OFFICIAL SEAL �' t; IA ROSIN A. BURGESS p`j(/y� ( ,(, t , ' /Y `\ �' NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON r Notary P1�UIjb for Oregon •, COMMISSION NO. 024552 `� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 16,1997 1 My Commission Expires: AFFIDAVIT • 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 S.W. Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). The Director has approved, subject to conditions a request to con- struct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square fooT of- 1 five building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Develop- ment Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 1846, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164; portions of the State Transportation Planning Rule not presently adopted within the Community Development Code. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone provides sites for the provision of a range of retail goods and services. 1- Itt SIN:' 1111u!�:111r. v.� Nr! ,l • :iiv 111: NM WO= Idea 1.1M U se " • NIL" ,Ti.ras 'it! a7 ii •..u.rr ......r ■ ,i��fr•ri 11i' M ■� l .•.vaulI. r 4. 3 :".■L 1C4:3.!.. "" :irriiii Ma r 5E;E : riso, II . 52111 T �'a % j� • �. I auCJyi'J N ill ":F'.� j P .... N.101 III 21 4111 4,' -■ ma la I T r.r frilii _ fir �W 'aim Sl' , .. 4-4//p * 47 , a = ,- Pa 1.1111 I ■ MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 94 -0015 SCHWARTZ/GOTTER LOCATION: 15900 S.W. 76th Avenue (WCTM 2S1 12CD, tax lot 500). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Minor Land Partition request to divide one parcel of approximately 71,002 square feet into three parcels of approximately 8,300, 10,450, and 47,490 square feet. The ap- plicant proposes to dedicate 4,762 square feet to the City for the S.W.. 76th Avenue right -of -way. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Com - munity Development Code Sections 18.52.050, 18.88.040 (C) (1), 18.162.040, 18.162.050, and 18.164. ZONE: R -7 (Residential, 7� units /acre) The R -7 zone allows single- family detached and attached residential units, duplex residential units, public support facilities, mobile9 home parks and subdivisions, residential treatment homes, farming, manufactured homes, family day care, home occupations, temporary uses and accessory structures among other uses. 0 I 1iVuiilitii 1i1 r■!� IE swam pe < . It me ■ �� it I Ii � " � w � w�l1llil �� P 11111 , �11111111111, r -'� �L. / AM_ 3 W o • I 00 0 ..:' 9 I ' SITE ENT REVIE DR 94- ABR I R LE AW LOCATION: 13885 and 13905 S.W. 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 1DC, tax lots 1100 and 1000). The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a Site Development Review request to allow an approximately 30,120 square foot expansion to an existing building to be used for manufacturing and a 3,770 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.72, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150, 18.164. ZONE: I -H (Heavy In- dustrial) The I -H zone allows manufacturing of products, packaging and processing, wholesale, storage and distribution, and public support facilltiec amnno nrF.i g VITA am ii, 1 Pi" oi l : IC mii iii11111101 1 % - lill %Malmo No /111111 ... mi---Wrellillim d ,.,atr,t•,• 7 r... _. yu •„t.i r ...,. 1 III inv•t . ;T •• in 1 ► •, r � W 1 ._ Q � Pill' N . � it . �� W ■ Z r te.._ ---1 MIN • R LAN 0 PARTITI • N MLP 94 -0014 AN • OAKS LOCATION. WCTM 2S1 IOBD, tax lot ]600). The site is located east o Aspen Ridge Drive subject to south side of s, a Mi o Lad Partit on to divide tor has pa app roximately 50,965 square feet into two parcels of ap- p roxima a of app purely 18,773 square feet and one access tract of CRITERIA: Community Develop- p- ment CoSections 18.102, 18.108,18. , and 18.164. ZONE: R-4.5 R eside tial, 4.5 unit /acre) The R -4.5 zone al- lo 8.1 ws single-family - family resi esi•5 (R dential units, public support facilities, s esidme lo treatment homes, farming, manufactured owes, family da ochre, home occupations, temporary uses, and accessory - Ir411111111111111. "Vigil ow.' ri1111,161 44,0 foiliiiiir NI NI r � �r ., ii wow es o W " 1 Ribmoies •rare slassaarrami 02111111, ussaustwrie _ ,,,,tior iii # • 0 44437 4 . J ........ w d statement of conditions can be The adopted finding of facts, decision, and obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 7 23. The decision may shall appeal be final on September 21.1994. Any party and Section p p al this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and des th t 18.32. 70 of the Community Development Code, which P ove and ai a ent. The dea line p- may be filed within days : PM P.M., September 21.1994. l for filing of an appeal is TT'8002 — Publish September 15, 1994. ■ • • ' H. S. Stein 13340 S.W. Hanson Rd. Consulting Engineer Beaverton, OR 97005 Phone /Fax (503) 641 -1437 RECEIVED July 11, 1994 AUG251994 Project No.: 127.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Bob Doran Assistant District Manager Highway Division Oregon Department of Transportation P.O. Box 25412 Portland, Oregon 97225 SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis for the Proposed Addition to the Aman Enterprises Facility along Pacific Highway (Highway 99W) in Tigard, OR. Dear Mr. Duran: Based on our past correspondence' and telephone conversations with you, Dennis Mitchell, and Sam Hunadi, I have performed an analysis of the traffic impacts for the proposed expansion of the Aman Enterprises facilities located along Highway 99W (Pacific Highway), just east of Dartmouth Street. The approximate location of the site is shown in Figure 1. The proposed expansion of the Aman Enterprises facility involves removing an 8,000 GSF building and • constructing a new 38,160 GSF building. The existing layout of the site and the proposed expansion are shown on Figures 2 and 3. It should be noted that this expansion is intended to provide adequate space and update the facilities on the site to better serve the existing Aman Enterprises activities and will not significantly increase vehicle trips to the site. Access to the site is via an existing driveway directly onto Highway 99W. This traffic analysis includes an assessment of the traffic impact of the buildout of this development as well as growth in background traffic due to other sources such as the Costco store under construction on Dartmouth Street. Based on the results of this analysis, it is concluded that the proposed expansion of the Aman Enterprises facility can be built without adversely affecting the traffic operational or safety characteristics of the adjacent street system. Specific findings of this analysis are as follows: • The proposed expansion of the Aman Enterprises facility is estimated to generate only 75 additional vehicle trips on the adjacent street system during a typical peak season weekday including approximately 10 vehicle trips occurring during the peak hours. As requested by ODOT, additional analysis was conducted assuming a higher use on the site. Based on ITE trip generation rates, these uses could generate up to 230 additional daily vehicle trips including 30 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 34 trips during the p.m. peak hour. Correspondence from Howard S. Stein to Bob Doran dated May 31, 1994 and June 14, 1994 • Traffic Operations • Development Impact • Parking • Accident /Safety Analysis • i • • Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 2 • The key major intersection in the vicinity of the site (Highway 99W /Dartmouth Street) currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) C during the critical p.m. peak hours. Traffic flows along Highway 99W are very heavy and in the future this intersection will operate at LOS D. However, the relatively few additional vehicle trips that will be generated by the proposed expansion of the Aman Enterprises facilities (using either the clients estimate of new trips or a more intense use) will have little impact on the LOS at this intersection. These additional trips will account for Tess than 1 percent of the current traffic volumes on Highway 99W. • No specific off-site improvements are recommended for roadways in the study area to accommodate future traffic that will be generated by the expansion of the Aman Enterprises facilities. The following paragraphs document the details of the study's methodology, results, and major findings. EXISTING CONDITIONS Transportation Facilities Figure 1 shows the approximate location of the Aman Enterprises site and the surrounding roadway network. The main roadway in the vicinity of the site is Highway 99W (Pacific Highway). This roadway is classified as an arterial roadway by ODOT. To the west of the area is the Route 217 limited access highway. Just to the west of the site, there is a new four leg intersection at Dartmouth Street/78th Avenue. The fourth leg was added to this intersection. Figure 1 also shows the location of all the signalized intersections in the immediate vicinity of the site. It should also be noted that the section of Pfaffle Street that intersects with Highway 99W is one way westbound for about 50 feet. The remainder of this street accommodates both eastbound and westbound traffic. Finally, although not shown in Figure 1, a new intersection is being constructed along Highway 99W at S.W. 72nd Avenue. This will divert traffic from the Highway 99W /S.W. 78th Avenue intersection and will be discussed later. It should also be noted that the section of Highway 99W through the study area is straight and level. The future traffic analyses in this study were conducted assuming the current roadway conditions and traffic signal timing. Land Uses Land uses in the immediate vicinity of the site consist mainly of small lot commercial uses. To the west and along Dartmouth Street there are larger commercial centers and stores. Along Pfaffle Street there are mostly single family homes. • • Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 3 Pedestrian and Bicycling Considerations All the streets in the immediate vicinity of the site have sidewalks, but there are no marked bicycle lanes . Few pedestrian and/or bicycling activities were observed during the peak period traffic counts. It is expected that the proposed development will have little impact on these modes of travel. Transit Considerations Tri -Met operates a bus route ( #12, Barbur Boulevard) along Highway 99W. Some the current and future employees of Aman Enterprises may use transit to get to the site. However, this study assumed that all the new trips to the site did not take advantage of this bus service. Existing Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations Traffic Volumes A reconnaissance of the site and its vicinity was conducted. Traffic volumes within the study area were obtained from actual weekday peak hour traffic counts conducted during May and June 1994. Figure 4 shows the result of the recent a.m. peak hour counts. Figure 5 shows the results of recent p.m. peak hour counts. Two p.m. peak hour counts were conducted at the site's driveway onto Highway 99W. Traffic volumes greater than 20 were rounded upward to the nearest five vehicles. This data collection revealed that the moming peak hour typically occurs between 7 -8 a.m. and the afternoon peak hour occurs between 5 -6 p.m. In addition, Figure 5 shows the results of a traffic count taken the Highway 99W /Dartmouth Street intersection during 1993 before the Cub Foods store (see Figure 1) had opened. Finally, it should be noted that some of the vehicles tuming into and out of the site's driveway are customers of the adjacent Key Bank. These customers park in the site's driveway and walk over to the bank. Peak Hour Traffic Operations Traffic conditions at the key intersection in the study area were analyzed during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Intersection operational analyses were conducted using the procedures in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) for evaluating signalized and unsignalized intersections which describe the traffic operations of an intersection in terms of its Level of Service (LOS). For unsignalized intersection, the intersection's LOS is stated relative to the most critical intersection maneuver, typically the left turn from the minor street approach. For signalized intersections, the LOS is a function of the average vehicle delay that vehicles on all approaches experience. The Level of Service (LOS) criteria range from "A ", which indicates little, if any, delay, to "F ", which indicates that vehicles experience long delays. The LOS worksheets for the results presented in this study are on file in my office and will be made available upon request. • Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 4 Table 1 shows the calculated LOS the Highway 99W /Dartmouth Street intersection. These results indicate that this intersection operates at LOS B during the a.m. peak hour and LOS C during the p.m. peak period. These results were confirmed by actual observation during these peak hours. Table 1: Existing 1994 Levels of Service Signalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volume to Average Level of Volume to Average Level of Capacity Vehicle Service Capacity Vehicle Service Ratio Delay (LOS) Ratio Delay (LOS) (V /C) (Sec/Veh) (V /C) (Sec/Veh) Hwy 99W/Dartmouth Street 0.62 8.2 B 0.87 19.9 C The intersection of the site's driveway and Highway 99W was observed during the two p.m. peak hour periods (May 20 and June 13), and measurements of vehicle delays were made. (The May 20 observation was videotaped and is available for review.) The results of these measurements indicate that traffic operations are actually better than the HCS procedures would estimate (LOS F). This disparity between the field observations and the HCS results may be attributed to the fact that the HCS procedures assume that vehicles on the main street (Highway 99W) flow in a random manner. In contrast, the traffic along Highway 99W is actually controlled by the nearby traffic signals at Dartmouth Street and at the Tigard Cinema. These signals will meter traffic through the study area. Field observations during the p.m. peak hour found that vehicles (3 vehicles ) tuming left out of the driveway ranged from 6 seconds to 125 seconds. Vehicles turning right out of the site (13 vehicles) had an average vehicle delay of 16.5 seconds, which would correspond to LOS C based on the TRB All -Way- Stop- Control procedure level of service delay criteria? Vehicles turning left into the site from eastbound ( 7 vehicles) on Highway 99W had an averaged vehicles delay of 25.8 seconds which would correspond to LOS D. Vehicle delay for this movement ranged from 6 seconds to 60 seconds. Overall, the vehicle delay experienced was a factor of when a tuming vehicle arrived at this intersection relative to the flow of traffic along Highway 99W. If a turning vehicle arrived near the end of the through movement on Highway 99W when traffic was clearing 2 See Tab /e 2, Page 19 in Transportation Research Boar, Interim Materia /s on Unsignai /zed Intersection Capacity, Circular 373, July 1991. • • Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 5 out, the driver would experience a short delay. If the vehicle arrived when the through movement had a red light, the tuming vehicle may have had to wait until the end of the next green phase along Highway 99W to make the turn maneuver. Based on this analogy, the capacity of this driveway is about 1 -2 vehicle maneuvers per cycle which would be 30 -60 vehicles per maneuver given a 120 second cycle length that is typical for Highway 99W. In addition, to the above vehicle delays were also observed during the a.m. peak hour. The delays experience during the a.m. peak hour were minor amounts; most vehicles could make their maneuver with Tess than 20 seconds of delay. Finally, it should be noted that given the relatively few vehicles tuming into and out of this driveway, there is rarely more than one vehicle waiting to make a maneuver at any given time. Traffic Safety The section of highway in the vicinity of the site has changed with the creation of the four leg intersection at Dartmouth Street. Past studies in this area have found that the number and rates of vehicle accidents along this section of Highway 99W to be consistent with nature of this highway. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The impact of traffic generated by the expansion of the Aman Enterprises facility on the surrounding street system during the critical weekday peak hours was analyzed as follows: • Existing traffic volumes were adjusted to reflect future 1995 background traffic conditions including other nearby developments and roadway improvements.. • Additional a.m. and p.m. peak hour trips both into and out of the site generated by the expansion of the Aman facilities were estimated for complete buildout conditions. As requested by ODOT staff, traffic generation estimates were also made for more intense uses that might occupy this facility. • Existing traffic volumes on the roadways surrounding the site and the site's proximity to major roadway were evaluated to estimate the trip distribution patterns in the study area for vehicle trips generated by the expansion of the Aman facilities. • Estimated site - generated traffic volumes during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours were assigned to the roadway network and added to the estimated background traffic volumes to represent future traffic conditions with full buildout of the site. This was also performed for the other more intense land uses. • • Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 6 • Future Levels of Service (LOS) at key intersections in the study area were examined under future background and two buildout scenarios. Future Background Traffic Volumes The proposed expansion of the Aman Enterprises facility is expected to occur by the end of 1995. To assess the likely future traffic conditions regardless of the proposed development, increases in traffic due to general growth as well as other proposed developments in the vicinity of tha site need to be estimated. A meeting was held with City of Tigard staff to review the area. This review found that there were several developments active in the area including a Taco Bell, expansion of Pacific Crossroads Center and a Costco store south of Highway 99W along Dartmouth Street. To estimate these future background volumes, traffic study for the Costco store was examined. This study accounted for all of the previous developments as well as the new connection of S.W. 72nd Avenue to Highway 99W. The only development that was not accounted for in the traffic study for the Costco store was the Taco Bell. However, this action is simply moving the Taco Bell from the south side of the Highway 99W to the north side of Highway 99W which will not add any new traffic to the section of Highway 99W in the immediate vicinity of the site. Figure 6 shows the future p.m. peak hour background traffic volumes that were estimated in the traffic study for the Costco store. (It should be noted that the negative numbers on this figure represent vehicle trips that are passing by the area and will be going to Costco as part of some other trip such as to /from work or home. These trips are deducted from the main flow and are incorporated into the tum volumes. This adjustment does not affect the number of vehicle trips going to the site, but what percentage will be from new vehicles on the roadway versus vehicles already on the roadway system.) In addition, traffic growth trends can be estimated from the actual traffic count data shown in Figure 5. The volumes in the Costco study suggest that traffic volumes will substantially increase within the next year along Highway 99W, even with diversion of vehicles to the Highway 99W /S.W. 72nd intersection. In contrast, the actual ground counts shown in Figure 5 indicate that traffic volumes along Highway 99W may have decreased. Season variation of traffic along Highway 99W could be as high as 5 percent, but this would still not account for the lower May 1994 volumes. In addition, traffic volumes on Highway 99W through the study should decrease even further once the connection with S.W. 72nd Avenue is made. Consequently, the May 1994 volumes were used as the future background traffic volumes along Highway 99W with additional volumes added for the Costco store during the p.m. peak hour. ' Kitte /son & Associates, Inc., Transportation Impact Study for Tigard Wholesale Out /et, September 1993. • Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 7 Given the above, Figure 7 shows the estimated future background traffic volumes used in this study. Capacity analyses of 1995 background volumes at the key intersection were performed and the results are shown in Table 2. Comparing these results with the LOS results for existing conditions indicates that traffic conditions will degrade during the p.m. peak hour. Table 2: Levels of Service for 1995 Background Traffic Volumes Signalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volume to Average Level of Volume to Average Level of Capacity Vehicle Service Capacity Vehicle Service Ratio Delay (LOS) Ratio Delay (LOS) (V/C) (Sec/Veh) (V/C) (Sec/Veh) Hwy 99W /Dartmouth Street 0.62 8.2 B 0.93 27.3 D Site Generated Traffic Volumes Figures 2 and 3 already presented the existing layout of the site and the proposed additional facilities. The primary business activities of Aman Enterprises is the sale and installation of home spas and pools. The site currently contains a two buildings: 13,050 GSF and 8,100 GSF. The uses in these buildings are classified as General Retail -Bulky Merchandise. A letter attached to this study from Aman Enterprises describes the current activities and employees (10 -12) in these buildings. Many of these employees, particular those involved with installing pools and spas, come to the site early in the moming and leave for their work site before 8 a.m. They also return the site after the traditional p.m. peak periods. Figure 3 shows the proposed expansion. This expansion will involve removing the existing 8,100 GSF building on the site and constructing a new storage and showroom area (38,160 GSF). The attached letter also details the future uses on the site and an estimate of future employees and customers. The impetus for the expansion is to update the facilities at the site. Based on the employee numbers and customers anticipated by Aman Enterprises staff, weekday peak summer season trip generation (into and out of the site) will increase slightly, perhaps by at most 10 trips during the peak hours and 75 vehicle trips throughout a typical weekday during the peak summer season. • • Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 8 These trip numbers correspond well with what might have been estimated for the site using ITE trip generation rates. Vehicle trips were estimated using trip rates in the 5th Edition of the Trip Generation Report (Land Use Codes 130 and 150) published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trip rates in this ITE publication are based on empirical observations performed at many similar sized developments located throughout the United States. Table 3 shows vehicle trips estimated using ITE trip rates for warehouses, which would best approximate the activities associated with the site's General Retail -Bulk Merchandise facilities. Comparing the base case (8,100 GSF) with the proposed expansion (38,160 GSF), these calculations estimate that daily traffic would increase by 150 trips including 17 vehicle trips during the a.m. peak hours and 22 vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hours. Table 3: Trip Generation for Estimates for Aman Enterprises Site Land Use Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Total In Out Total In Out Removed Building (8,100 GSF) 40 5 4 1 6 1 5 ITE Warehouse Rate* Development Plan (38,160 GSF) 115 15 11 4 16 5 11 Aman Employee Estimate Development Plan (38,160 GSF) 190 22 16 6 28 9 10 ITE Warehouse Rate* Development Plan (38,160 GSF) 270 35 29 6 40 5 35 ITE Light Industrial Rate ** * Based on ITE Land use Code 150 Warehouse ** Based on ITE Land Use Code 130 Light Industrial As requested by ODOT, a more intense use for the site was also estimated. Given the type of buildings proposed, trip estimates for light industrial uses were also estimated using ITE trip rates. Based on these calculations, the increase vehicle trips would be 230 trips throughout a weekday including 30 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 34 trips during the p.m. peak hour. Distribution and Assignment of Site - Generated Traffic The directional distribution of the traffic generated by the expansion of the Aman Enterprises facilities was estimated for the roadway network by considering existing travel patterns along Highway 99W, the proximity of the Route 217 and traffic volumes currently going to /from the site. Considering all these factors, it was estimated that about 75 percent of the traffic to /from the site • Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 9 would be from the west and 25 percent to/ from the east. Figure 8 displays the trip distribution and vehicle assignment for new trips that would be generated by the site during both peak hour periods using the Aman Enterprises estimate of new trips to the site. Similarly, Figure 9 shows the trip distribution and assignment for traffic that will be going to /from the site from vehicles that would be generated using the higher number of trips based on light industrial uses. Comparing the traffic volumes in either of these figures with the background volumes in Figure 7 reveals that the new vehicle trips that will be generated by the proposed development will account for less that 1 percent of the current traffic flows along Highway 99W. Total Future 1995 Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service Total future 1995 peak hour traffic volumes were estimated by adding the background future traffic volumes displayed in Figure 7 to the volumes that would be generated by buildout of the expansion of the Aman Enterprises facilities shown in Figures 8 and 9. Figure 10 displays the total future peak hour traffic volumes for the.a.m. peak hour for the two trip estimate scenarios. Similarly, Figure 11 displays the total future peak hour traffic volumes for the p.m. peak hour for the two trip estimate scenarios. Table 4 summarizes the results of the intersection LOS analyses for this total future buildout scenario. The LOS results in this table are the same to the results for the future background traffic conditions. Thus, the traffic generated by either trip estimate scenario will have a negligible impact on traffic conditions along Highway 99W. Table 4: Levels of Service for 1995 Total Buildout Traffic Volumes Signalized Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Volume to Average Level of Volume to Average Level of Capacity Vehicle Service Capacity Vehicle Service Ratio Delay (LOS) Ratio Delay (LOS) (V/C) (Sec/Veh) (V/C) (Sec/Veh) Hwy 99W /Dartmouth Street Aman Trip Estimate 0.62 8.2 B 0.93 27.3 D Light Industrial Uses 0.63 8.2 B 0.94 27.6 D • 1 Aman Enterprises July 11, 1994 Page 10 SITE ACCESS Access to the site will be via the existing driveway onto Highway 99W. This driveway is approximately 58 feet wide. As discussed in detail earlier, traffic operations at this driveway are constrained by traffic flows along Highway 99W, but measured vehicle delays are still acceptable based on LOS criteria. Estimated capacity at this driveway was 30 -60 vehicles per hour for each of the tum maneuvers. Examining the traffic volumes shown in Figures 10 and 11, none of the critical left maneuvers at this driveway approach this number. Thus, future vehicle delays should be acceptable. Also, the volumes are so low that there is little chance that two vehicles will arrive at the same time and, consequently, vehicle queuing should not be a problem along Highway 99W. ODOT also requested that information be provided regarding the location of adjacent driveways relative to the access driveway to this site. Figure 12 presents this information. There are adjacent driveways, but based on the existing buildings there appears to be little opportunity to consolidate these driveways at this time. In addition, it should be noted that the layout of the adjacent Key Bank is such that the circulation is towards Pfaffle Street and S.W. 78th Avenue where there is a signalized intersection at Highway 99W. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the analysis described in this letter, it is concluded that the proposed expansion of the Aman Enterprises facilities will have little, if any, impact on future traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site. No specific off -site roadway improvements are recommended to accommodate this development or mitigate its impact. If there are any questions related to the data or analysis contained in this report, please contact me directly. Sincerely, _. E O PROF G% N4 , 9 ' b Howard S. Stein, P.E. '� 17,045 Transportation Engineer S '! f s e tisti attachments OREGON y '414, la . vast cc: Aman Enterprises, Inc., Applicant �4Ao sco R s� City of Tigard Renew Date I Dennis Mitchell, ODOT PROJ127.RPT Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map Lane �� V Configurations j f� — r ;SITE, tr' 0 • a j a as r. N. N N Pfaffle Street Key Bank • ■ a) o \ o Pacific cc • Crossroads Tigard • 99) Cinema A h Pacific Hig w • N Cub Foods k II Costco m 4 • 0 E t co 0 N Traffic Signal O Drawing not to scale Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer % Figure 2: Existing Layout of Site • Ir CD \ ,5„ \ 1 1., custwa COm0.0.3. MD. \ id. COSMO 1,11ONO aW t 4 ...---035114C S I 1 ial \ 4) .,„ , •,, \ 1 1' DPS1.4,Xx.., .._, (2%1. Tar a ,e we sy .. • 035.0 C010,1¢ \ I IRIANNONALLaa., LOSINC BOOM b : I Imp To Patanc •spaa• S turn. am.: 1...0. Ow =IOC p 1 UsielVIANkue r.: ONO 'MOW \ War.12.0.0 Of, tI \ .1 1 • II A 0. 1 , fl I ... .1: 111 0210,4 Pasok Ii,.1 11 \ 1 _...Carne3 \ rucc I ) I II I Car., WA aa.4 - _ - - -- - --- - - - - - ---- _ L TO IC FOAOND *ROI. ZICO SO /T. - .r,-.F Ea ... r - — - - ----•- - — - • ' - - — - - — - — - La IA TV Cn" J 5 Egon. araltrorda 1..04 YEA .-Ti•-, = I ' i ZOMC "or TOat .C-0. ow. 3.ale a 1 '' I 4.' SITE PLAN - EXISTING 1 • 0 ........_ • • • Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer • Figure 3: Proposed Site Plan for Expansion of Aman Enterprises Facility • \ 44 U q .Qa P frM • ■ - -- - - — - - — - - -- - — - .t _ _ —....— - _ i ____ - _ ILAM..G 0 , , „ . 3 <1 I , . ! , , IP E, , .... , . 1 TO 1 4 .W4 r. ..•� �' \ • �iid 9 ./L INC N a•• Si ,r • T nw.t I 11150 PI p•tanc .. • I d 711.3.0111 L. IOM. tM I. 107..0 r 91 - iR -r • II •••. •.:•• • m� aS • I Q • • .0•03 Ka nv ••.. .7 C. S fa 1.1•40 LAM. 1 • 1 ,•saa,w a n. MI.. ` 1 r -r e a a a • L b - rata - I�7 r - .- • - - --•- G - Jor l l J re 5. n MK . .t A. 'WI' I 0_ 1 V —_ I i a O SITE PUN • • ,• VI flATA; n • ..w.o..... v.m ••. _ • uarr1 tt.. sr• 4W. __ , W. a art. • 11 v.aa 1.0.. EME© ©_ •••e i mu• RL sm 111 . m vm II? STAMM 11••0 ISILICMISMIL •s amr v•m rtwam. ` II .L„ • ay . • ILLS I .WII I OM 111 • gait MI ..I.q . aao�rit 1. ..... 7. 2O * R•IYO.t•)•UaKR .Ia1r W.* 10. rL Mill1111121 -14/ • O SITE DATA 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION D VICINITY MAP .•-q AZILL • Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer • Figure 4: Recent A.M. Peak Hour Volumes CO r i N %SITE 4 4 II s` Q 3 frf N - N e0 «. r O cc co 120 Pfaffle Street 14 pacific Highway •. P 0 N to o N 0 Of L • o 6 J L E 1490 © al 1110 R 60 r 17 fZi 1 t N O�� Tr N 1- Traffic Signal May 1994 Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale Amen Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer Figure 5: Recent P.M. Peak Hour Volumes May 20 (June 13) 1994 ,--_- zr) N N SITE 4 4 • > j (3)3 MI A L 4(1) r t j d C - ti o 0 cc N 155 / Pfaffle Street - a Ti; E May 1994 (August 1993) pacific Ht9hw y N t o co o r v C • • E °' T 1r IL► ci (70)55 1 L 16(30) (1695)1395 ∎ 1735(1990) (5)110 6 '4. r 55(5) N i 1 * r ........ c co Traffic Signal .00.0..2 N co n � 0 0 Drawing not to scale Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer Figure 6: Projected 1994 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes with Costco From KAI Transportation Impact Study r SITE III N. a /// T w to N. y.+ o cc u) Pacific Hig Pfaffle Street Costco Traffic Background Volu es Note: Negative Volumes are Trips to Site from Pass -By Trips °° ° 1 • 1 4 -25 -30 70 L 30 95 r' 75 1675 1985 \ °1 t y N o° 0 N to lA Traffic Signal Source: Kittelson & Associates, Inc., Tranportation Impact Study for Drawing not to scale Tigard Costco Wholesale Outlet, September 1993. Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer Figure 7: Future Background Traffic with Costco and Adjusted for Recent Counts /SITE • ~ a j �- r / w 30 z i■ o CC ( 4 Pfaffle Street ill" �' m o o pacific N19hw y �, v v a th .c to O to to v (3) J14 G (55)6 1 L 2(20) E (13 7)1490 .► 4- 1110(1705) 5 eta r 17 fa '11 t N O i 0 Tt su N v Traffic Signal _ � v AM(PM) Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer Figure 8: Increase in Traffic Associated with Proposed Development Plan Based on Aman Employee Estimates N r . �SITE 4) 4 • N Q j (3)5 J AL 2(1) T • 0 o s 0 1C Pfaffle Street 25% ii* 0 pacific Highway .�'~. P N o 75% E • co 0 N Traffic Signal AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer Figure 9: Increase in Traffic Associated with Buildings with More Intense Use , Increase in Trips for Light Industrial Uses Using ITE Rates CM j 1 T C , SITE 4i 4 • ti Q //// (3)18 A L 7(1) T .c � w O = o cc co Pfaffle Street 25% ai Pacific Highway d in r oo 75% E 0 al c N Traffic Signal tS AM (PM) Peak Hour Volumes Drawing not to scale Amen Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer Figure 10: Future A.M. Peak Hour Volumes with Site Developed Under the Two Scenarios Aman Estimate(More Intense Use) ri CZ .... C , / SITE * 4 4 • n Q (21)8 J 5(9) T . 0 cc N 120 / Pfaffle Street iir■ p a Highway !1...) N Na ��� 410 II .) 14 g 1 t 2 0 6 .,,� L 2 1495 1112 1508 1114 41 r 17 60 4 r 17 4 t N O v N d) Traffic Signal Aman Estimate More Intense Use Drawing not to scale Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer Figure 11: Future P.M. Peak Hour Volumes with Site Developed Under the Two Scenarios Aman Estimate(More Intense Use) r (/ / N Q SITE 4 t * t• Q % (6)6 L 6(6) fp 415 r o it 155 Pfaffle Street li rA acific 141911w" P L o 0 cri . 0 O la r • in o 0 G 55 1 L 20 o r E 1378 •+0 1709 co t4L20 205 �� � r 130 55 A , Ar , 1378 1728 0 in a ,1/ \ 205 ,, hhhh 13o N O1 1 1 r Aman Estimate Traffic Signal Q o LA N a N Cn 1- Drawing not to scale More Intense Use Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer Figure 12: Location of Adjacent Driveways Home Aman • Enterprise a puto > Repairs L 0 D B ank 28 Ft Drive Thru 1 8 Ft Window 50 Feet 20 Ft 70 Ft • 110 Feet Highway 99W t Drawing not to scale Measurements are approximate N Aman Enterprises H.S. Stein, P.E., Transportation Engineer *MAN ENTERPRISES, INA P.O. BOX 19089 PORTLAND, OR 97280 -0089 (503) 452 -1094 June 1, 1994 Bob Doran OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Western Division Office 2131 S.W. Scholls Ferry Road Portland, OR 97210 Mr. Doran: Per instructions from Sam Hunaidi relating to an access permit on Pacific Highway, we have retained Howard Stein, Transportation Consultant, to undertake the necessary traffic study and prepare the reports requested. Mr. Stein has conveyed to me your concern that the proposed site development and resulting uses may result in a "major" change of use as respects traffic impact. To the contrary, we do not anticipate any significant increased traffic to result from the proposed development or uses as compared with past and present uses of the site. PAST USES: At the time we acquired the property in late 1993, the uses on the site included: Motor Home Fabrication & Repair 6-7 employees 3 -4 daily customers Church Offices 4 -5 employees 10 daily member visits & volunteers Church School & Daycare 4 -5 employees 40 daily attendees & volunteers Church Sanctuary 100+ attendees on weekend All of these uses had been active on the site for several years up to and including late 1993. Page -2- S • PROPOSED USES: Aman Enterprises displaced the Motor Home facility and Church Sanctuary in late 1993 and installed 5-6 employees on the site, soon to be increased to 10-12 employees irrespective of the proposed development. The Church School & Daycare activity has slowly vacated the site in preparation for our increased presence. Aman Enterprises shall become the exclusive user of the site, and projected employment of approximately 20 on -site employees is not significantly impacted by the proposed development. You will note that the proposed development does not increase office space, restroom facilities or any other improvements allowing an increase in the site's capacity to accommodate employment. In like manner, the number of customer trips anticipated at the developed site is not effected by the proposed development. The current and proposed uses, which are • consistent with the zoning of the property, are predominantly a "bulky merchandise" . . specialty retailing activities which are inherently low traffic generating activities, most • especially during weekdays. In addition, the retail activity is highly seasonal, so that • traffic which is generated is concentrated in the summer months. We would, frankly, be hard pressed to suggest an appropriate use for site as zoned which would generate less weekday traffic than those of Aman Enterprises. The significant proposed increase in enclosed space is in large part a direct result of the sheer size and bulk of the inventory being displayed and inventoried, not additional . capacity for customers or employees. Were we siting the business in a warmer, more . arid climate, far Tess enclosed space would be required as out of doors displays and storage would be employed without resulting weather damage. TRAFFIC IMPACT: Our projections of customer trips are based on our extensive experience, nearly thirty years, in the swimming pool, spa and related retail industry. Again we would stress that neither the level of employment at the site nor the number of customers is a direct result of the proposed development, and neither exceeds recent or historic uses of the site. 1993 1994 -95 USES PROPOSED # of employees weekdays 14 -17 20 app. # of members /customers weekday avg. 50-55 8-10 # of members /customers weekend avg. 100 20-25 V . • • Page -3- • • To summarize, even during seasonal peaks the proposed uses generate less traffic than past uses and year round averages are significantly lower than past uses. For these reasons, we respectfully submit that the proposed site development and uses do not create a "major" change in traffic generation related to the site. Sin .rely, Walter L. Aman • • MAN ENTERPRISES, INC. P.O. BOX 19089 PORTLAND, OR 97280 -0089 (503) 452 -1094 June 1, 1994 . Bob Doran OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Western Division Office . 2131 S.W. Scholls Ferry Road Portland, OR 97210 . Mr. Doran: Per instructions from Sam Hunaidi relating to an access permit on Pacific Highway, we . have retained Howard Stein, Transportation Consultant, to undertake the necessary traffic . study and prepare the reports requested. Mr. Stein has conveyed to me your concern that . the proposed site development and resulting •uses may result in a "major" change of use . as respects traffic impact. To the contrary, we do not anticipate any significant increased... ' traffic to result from the proposed development or uses as compared with past and present uses of the site. PAST USES: . At the time we acquired the property in late 1993, the uses on the site included: Motor Home Fabrication & Repair ' 6-7 employees 3-4 daily customers Church Offices 4 -5 employees 10 daily member visits & volunteers Church School & Daycare 4 -5 employees 40 daily attendees & volunteers Church Sanctuary 100+ attendees on weekend All of these uses had been active on the site for several years up to and including late 1993. • • • Page -2- PROPOSED USES: Aman Enterprises displaced the Motor Home facility and Church Sanctuary in late 1993 and installed 5-6 employees on the site, soon to be increased to 10-12 employees irrespective of the proposed development. The Church School & Daycare activity has slowly vacated the site in preparation for our increased presence. Aman Enterprises shall become the exclusive user of the site, and projected employment of approximately 20 on -site employees is not significantly impacted by the proposed development. You will note that the proposed development does not increase office space, restroom-facilities or any other improvements allowing an increase in the site's capacity to accommodate employment. In like manner, the number of customer trips anticipated at the developed site is not • ' effected by the proposed development. The current and proposed uses, which are - consistent with the zoning of the property, are predominantly a "bulky merchandise" specialty retailing activities which are inherently low traffic generating activities, : most • especially during weekdays. In addition, the retail activity is highly seasonal, so that . traffic which is generated is concentrated in the summer months. We would, frankly, be • hard pressed to suggest an appropriate use for site as zoned which would generate less weekday traffic than those of Aman Enterprises. The significant proposed increase in enclosed space is in large part a direct result of the . sheer size and bulk of the inventory being displayed and inventoried, not additional capacity for customers or employees. Were we siting the business in a warmer, more . • arid climate, far Tess enclosed space would be required as out of doors displays and storage would be employed without resulting weather damage. TRAFFIC IMPACT: Our projections - of customer trips are based on our extensive experience, nearly thirty years, in the swimming pool, spa and related retail industry. Again we would stress that 0 neither the level of employment at the site nor the number of customers is a direct result of the proposed development, and neither exceeds recent or historic uses of the site. 1993 1994 -95 USES PROPOSED # of employees weekdays 14 -17 20 app. # of members /customers weekday avg. 50-55 8-10 # of members /customers weekend avg. 100 20-25 • • . • Page -3- To summarize, even during seasonal peaks the proposed uses generate less traffic than past uses and year round averages are significantly lower than past uses. For these reasons, we respectfully submit that the proposed site development and uses do not create a "major" change in traffic generation related to the site. Sin - rely, : Walter L. Aman • . • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mark Roberts August 23, 1994 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer RE: SDR 94 -0017 AMAN Description: The applicant proposes to construct a 40,000 sft building addition to the existing structure at 11655 SW Pacific Highway. The site is located on the north side of the highway, northeasterly of SW Pfaffle Street. Findings: 1. STREETS: The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared by H.S. Stein, Consulting Engineer, dated July 11, 1994. The report analyzes the effects of the additional traffic from the site at the existing driveway and the impact to the traffic on SW Pacific Highway, a State Highway. The report concludes that the additional traffic will have little impact on the traffic utilizing SW Pacific Highway and the closest street intersection at SW Dartmouth Street. No improvements are recommended. The applicant shall obtain a revised ODOT access permit for their connection to SW Pacific Highway. The highway has been constructed to current State standards and no additional right - of -way or street construction is required. However, the sidewalk width is substandard and the applicant should be required to construct a new sidewalk to a width of 8 feet, consistent with the existing new sidewalks in the area. In addition, the existing driveway is over 50 feet wide, in excess of the City standards, and should be re- designed to provide a curvilinear exit with a radius of 25 feet, similar to the entry side of the driveway. The existing power poles and overhead lines serving the area are located along both sides of SW Pacific Highway and the applicant should place the facilities located along this frontage underground, or pay the fee in -lieu of undergrounding. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer is located in SW Pacific Highway and has sufficient capacity to serve this development. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -17 AMAN PAGE1 • • 3. STORM SEWER: The site currently is partially covered by the existing building and an asphalt concrete driveway that both drain in a southerly direction toward SW Pacific Highway. The proposed site development will increase the amount of impervious area. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. The applicant's site plan provides for an on- site water quality facility that includes a new underground outfall line connecting to the underground system in SW Pacific Highway. The facility should comply with the minimum USA design standards. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan showing a driveway with curb returns with a minimum radius of 25 feet for approval of the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department(639- 4171) 2. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work within the right -of -way of SW Pacific Highway (99W). A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of the building permit. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639- 4171) . 3. The applicant shall remove and replace the existing driveways and sidewalk as shown on the site plan. The sidewalk shall be 8 feet wide as measured from the face of curb. 4. The applicant shall provide for on -site water quality treatment, as shown on the site plan, as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and ,Order No. 91 -47. Design calculations shall be in conformance with the general requirements of Surface Water Quality Facilities Technical Guidance Handbook, USA, 1991. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 -4171) 5. The applicant shall demonstrate that the downstream storm drain system will not be unduly affected by the on -site storm drainage run-off. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 -4171) ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -17 AMAN PAGE2 . • III 6. The applicant shall underground the existing overhead utilities along the northerly side of Pacific Highway, or pay the fee in- lieu of undergrounding. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639- 4171) APPROVED: -1'.(j‘7 andall R. Wooley City Engineer N: \ENGINEER \SDR94- 17.mja • ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -17 AMAN PAGE3 08/22/94 13:28 To MET -► 503 684 7297 N0. 322 002 • • • • • • • • • 'REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO' 4 V-1 `" t V3 03k�: k/ DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department • RE: ELOPMENT REVIEW. SDR 94 -0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655• SW Pacific Hig way (WCTM 151 36CA,.tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing.14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102,, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. • Attached is the Site P1an•and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW'Hall Blvd., Tigard, oR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171, STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: WO have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. • Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: 'erg • Me. t ccorn "WO ' mod ' • a � ' wt11 ye 10 6 44440Delt bt Imo Yvt id ur+�4ctw� t,1. • thitumme -... ti dutvcw • • Name of Person Commenting: 4r10.11M I • Phone Number: 2.10‘ # 01 4 • • • • • • AUG 11sp. • • • 08/22/94 13:29 TR� ET 503 684 7297 NO. 322 P03 tli [..6t111:1 u. , } 11 j i W 1 II S �;;S. 111■., ■ ■ i� 1 1■ Ili ;► Ar - II III Frj - I L 'I em. 1 '11 S . � s 1 ' = :'1 '�I 1�:: E:�� III p' .. LI NI,.. u.■ _ III rid ■;.. 1 - , �. • On. I. ■B: iIK +`JNii _. P�aa mow 4ir"' 1 :uof' a • 1 1 /tai 1111.1"°' �--� � �1 dm Is w ametani B • r = , Ca �1 !ra ���ti�� �� V ig�inv wit rs3 IP, S . s SITE » l Z �1t _ go f Z . - ,A itti&I,P • 101 - -- - -- pr. ri,ANTA %VI ,441k IL .- _ RIIIIII di ill nit,. 11.1 1111 111 P 1 Ell it vi ri cr Milli r SIII � 2 • m " .III cI , 1 L4pD)...,...._______ < ---. ,..‘ a • mil iire lilt MI Ili fir tlif Illillit - ant iri".1 - 1 211 '111 ›- . In! L L • - 1 MINIR,Dep it - 0 . * .i111 kten NEAR a • ' i 4 .Erns I - ;� �•• NENTARY • I - II - 9 VICINITY CASE NO. EXHIBIT M a P • gIT$ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW #94 - 0017 • • . • RECEIVE ® , � ; �� u _ ,r I REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO t �( �1 I)i4t L A4iC -+ DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning epartment RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: () Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: 1-2 ),5" / / • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: � / ..,.`„ DATE: August 10, 1994 1 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: S GTO ° oL)‘__ o Mega FD@LY Do D d A A ��b a�Qa D EC W 0 Slats POU- � P0 (4_1/;) MvZ,1M 46Aa, & AUG 1 1 i994 461qJ H4G ua0k BY Name of Person Commenting: 4,o p Phone Number: n .� V7P, o • • • RECEIVED AUG 1 7 1994 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: �8 DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning ill Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1. 36CA, tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18..102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other infcrmation available tc our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. • STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written Comments: 0 lQ LOPF eicrko 1d4 TF Tet P,1 n)E_ FA C U Tl & ( (.Q c x cam) Name of Person Commenting: 9• (yd(QAaeii►y2 Phone Number: (o 20 —S 9 .43 - • • • • - 1110 nt.k6( REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond .by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE-HECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: t We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: ( et,Vp Phone Number: .- • Aga ''__LL-- rl - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS �� TO: 1 �'�T� DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 1:8.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 14125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: ; iC(1/2 (/ 4 r L Phone Number: S ---''' Z Z K "Z 04 ( / 5 \ f Y 1 1 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO:A/4'f. C D • DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: > We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. N Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: / �' n )'? Phone Number: �'I • • TO:7 ,/� i 2t1 4 I'14tZ(/1JF REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 0 I(c(X DATE: August 10, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 - 0017 AMAN LOCATION: 11655 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CA, tax lot 1600). Construct a 40,000 square foot addition to an existing 14,900 square foot office building. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.32, 18.62, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone permits a range of retail goods and services. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by Aug. 22, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enrl eatetter. ++ (/a Q./ el C oact ev477 Written Comments: /icc £ V - r 1a� ��t 1/ _ J / G7 J a vno ,n ✓- YZ) 6vL�l�C ��C/' Oer/LGL �� sS-� e 6 -� Name of Person Commenting: t 2 ((Ey .) efriNL1g (� U✓ Phone Number: 39 40 • l; . IA L C. 1 1 () i • . W . . • • . • SE . MAP.. . , , ri. . • . ( . • ,,,ze.,„„,.,,;,•,•„„,• ,firr, ,,,,,,s1. s is. • • , A 1 R :, 82 ' cP• ' 40.20 * as . * cm 4) 85 ° 71 Rik* • (Pt 71 e : 11&40 t• I ' L X - • 4 2008 G ..., R*15 5700 5800 5900 6000 R•16 0 -R.I6 6900 7000 7100 • • ... 23,r rs- . "a J. SAX 4.'4 .1" ;,41 . 7 ••■ 4,4 , /1 "I ft 8 7 . 6 8 5 8 4 a ., 3 8 2 BI I 138 , - S•.'. g _J co . ,..):) ,: .• , ' 1 415/479 . • e f.'• 1 10 4 ? 80.20 TRACT tr ; a. 13 1 .:t; . ...„ *xi 4,fil ST ' r • • . ' ' it) ■•..J ' • ( SOS STOTT - D. LC. 97NO. 53 85 0181 ' NORT LINE c a . 0E • RICHARDSON • . C. 55' 1 t a I "':4•_ 85 • . . es 85 SOUTH LINE THOM 0 9 ,. . _ • 74.8Z ..... 41 1„....89.83 MI...2j. 4•1P 9 124.67 1- 4ae4 • . , • . r ....1-..... ...- F - 60., '+'' ,4 •1'.`1•.• : '' § • ' Ann.. •:: .! 1 e : 2 204' Yunft 1 . )4,2v VV ler... 1 Vii ;khry(42: i•STORM.r.:DETENTION a .. ..i • 14 - X.. • ■1 . 7 ,. I : 8i , .../ ...., ....; •.2/..,e,,,,, , I V, ■,: 'h • T,. 6100 \, 1 1 t. I I / 4 z •. - 4. ` ' . '') 4 I. NCN z § et•ee'w ...., .. ,. .. es.oe ., .• . • i I I, ,,•.! r PARK 4 . : ., 5500 „ IN:I. • .,, • ••; 1 " ' ) 2007„., '...,. , • ,,, ,.,, .,,.. 8 06 2 203 . 1 ',...°: / 9 :: t. .549.44 - . ' :,. - ,r.,' •"--- l• ...Is in . • ts 41 'o I ICI •= I I I el 0 v7 to N t N I n _01 ItH 23 IR. 25 r /- , 0 _ 12 - 13 4. / / ■ 9 4 • . 14 . 9$3 44 80 1 nag_ ... v W `-' 'T(3,1--- 81 18 P i 1 6. i 14 eye: . Pl • , r: 1 4.„ ........w.,4 / cor . . -1 4 2 4 ' 3 as .1 / 1 V i 3 /. . • • o p, If I . • ' .\ . 49 10 RI 0 N....INITIAL PT * Cr .• 5 . cc; w ' I' 2009 : ' • 121.04 . • N t Y{CTFT. el- - - p rt 6 i t ( Tii.fi- - ) / 15 - A ? w .:' fill t !■. ' .36 Ac. , .. . 12 - A ISLAND ' A ISLAND ' A & r 140.08 / ' • ;.` er ' 2 202', . • ' g • • , . . .,:" 8 .,. . .•: : ief -Tri 96 • .• :‘`: .; •:. • • N 0 , ili \ 04 ; . I: ' 13 • • • 137.79 1 (3\ ftl RI _,_ ,,, 0 : • 2 ' • - 1 •••-1- N 89-516"09-wi - - - - 280 • ‘. 8 .. • • r N89° 4 51W 2006 . :e I ..1 . . ' I 33.5 4 :t . . • N . . r_.. • I r .-. r -- , F y 2 201 ? .• .14 Ac..•-. . . . 589°43E ■-..."). 1 r rj H D I / D \ JV r) 0 • •, r, , . •' •,' .../ fity31•Ver // A 4 . C I '• 6 ? N I • ! '. . 16 . * • . : . :4) . • . c• !I '•( • . . . 2003 • s Vr.-rov• " . : . . • • 2001' I . , on • N 89°16 58 W „ . 800 •••• ,' ••::: • a. • 4700 lo .0, .• . •s-,../ 2 9 4.2 ' , ; P, 1 2 06.6 500 PPr6.0 • 1700 t; '0 r, e. : r. :, (.:: 9 f.. .89 Ac. ' • • 1 3:9,1 i I. 3 4 A 4. • :4'1 . • . • . ...1 i 4 0 07 . • 140.67 6 00 ' ; • 200 2 ! i. 1 ,.. • .• ;. • . . • . • 1,1 10 4 . 7 14.1 = -... .: N or) • . . 0 i 00 . , . . - . . oa . ,.s. • -------------__k As ' . ; • 500 ,k , • • N 8 . 6 49 • 4 , 0 k'' 206 • 37.79 o 2:s • 1505 • • e N • i 7200 9 = \ ,. .. . . 1993 0 -‘_, f2 . .116Ac '1 il 'POO la • 137.79 4 `• • T .7 g v. . • t R 7 300 . • o • . ,,' ti 7 I 3 T. 79 . , • co : 7 7. 1 • ' • 600 . ;,....., ,,- ,.,.. N 69 49 E , .• ,•, • 00 ' 4900. • ... 47, th *'. ri• r) , - . r. • c.; ...., dr I 6 k 0 206 • • : in e.) ii.4211.7•44//iviy? ., 4 '01 . , r al 7 0 2 o 1504 . ......-- - -......... a .. (.1 . .„. --- - „ „, . . • ri r. - /7941c. ) 41) .. a 8 9 *; : 5000 0. cr on It r 4,1 101.0 - -: .1 e4 = ..... *V • 132.59 • O w 0 • o r D . • . :: a 4, • 4 '" • , . ....: 1.2.1•1_3 2, ...., 'T. .•i h- - ,_ ; 0 ? .. ., 1 . •• Z.: IriTIAL POIN 12 oi LLI • • . ,/;IIIAIA.VALE T 65 l w 1 ' 23-8 I 1 . 510U 0 , 700'. . . 0 a • ,,.. - n . 8 9° ow ' .29Ac. • ) .54 A 4. O 1800 -..... Li., = 800 , • 5 , 113 0 ::: 0 : 1m P .25A4.•'. (CS 13,656) - a) 0 ., w • . o 1503 . a -- as "?..• i ) i. ' . .9044. i • I • - 0 0 . ■ U a 5201 0 0 • 1) • ..... • ii, a .? , • R .244c. . 2 139c. . . . .11 e 45 -I . - - ' • 0 . • Of • r 0 11) \ "' ' •" o .i: o • • ) ... : • . . ...9,, 40 . - 'f ''.' • ; 1 : 1.. , PI 2 / i * s • 53601.r: • : ,•. • •• 1- .44 Ac ....?:i •1000 . 11 . ., i . .25 Ac.'d •• • . 161.6 S 88°1? • I: 110 98 ' .. 0 ki • A i ..' ; I 1 .. ••••,„' ''' ° 0 co .14 0 w 1502 . . . . . 8 . 0 ■ . • , tn y . ;.'1 • 1.4 • . . 0 oi () P 1: ' ; . • • ''' . 1 1 ) 00 . : : , . . ■ 0 . ? •• .. ) • ,,' 54_02 .1 . ,...t, g 15 • • 6 /7 Ac. : / • ' i' 0 ..1,..; 0 ,: . . • 0 . • . . kl 1.• 40 189 *42.07 '' 5E49 , • , ■re I b ri : 0 • • ' / • R Is - • ■ I !..* 1601 lit A 0 . I ' • . ''. i ' 'ilf ' .. . 0 • 8 5401' c . . 0 1200 ;I • d •II 1.20,44. t . . • 16 #4 \ - 17 Ac.1.; ; - ,k..5 •.2J A 4.4 1 9 r •.' . i ..- 1. ,......... ,.. O. is 1 ' g e ., on . •• 0. . , • lc 85.0 • w ' (I ‘ r i•• c 1, :•.:•:.• ; r .0 • i• \N\ •: • ,. 54 1400 00• ri fv• i.' 1 ! I . •• • • •••. .. .28 Ac.• : 1 .. . t... .,.. \ . I \ •• . .46 Ac. . - 13 00 i . • 14/ . , /0.6, k , . (CS. No.11,530) 1)) . . ' I to q U) .3i AC. S 1 i +. . i 1.1 0 IL 1 .. . '..• • el 1 V • ' I I 2: . ...: !, . , • ... ... ..;" ! : :. ' • % . -.• ., : • .„: 2. a ,_ . ..* , • • 1 ••• ! . , • , :`•1 7 el •••• • il Brae' ocet , et . t14.35 .0. • N811°5 a'W t' .. " ;•1 . . •L 2.24.5 4 14C' 0 • 126160 ' 'II GA ;7: 12 1 • It1.11 • 4 6 • • 6119•1711. ' •-• '• 4 1k...... j ,.,1.4....; • , ,•,..,,,,,,... • •-• • LI 1029 eoa , leffs• ..... . :Trwerkt•e .,.. ,. ." .• -7 4.- ut: e: .1,";:;;,... irtii414;44ittv..- - .- • ISSO•17 r. ow "PFA'FFL E"" '••••••••i•••".` STREET 9.- o • .. oa••■•■.....,..■■., .......■................. GO IS 1 36CD .• 7 RI"' . . . - i L., 16..7. • ,,•.... • .,, ...,. , • .,., .:;:•,,..• ... .::•..,, ..:,t .......,..:::: „..:, I: / . . • . ..., .: ... .. . • ................ .... .• •. •. • ..... . r� �_�R _ .. �'n :, - v w •_ -[ � ^",. °r�:5: " .a , 3 ._--- .. - — mss.. rr '�'. . }..%4 " "x f""` -= _ -a,c.w - .'X". 3`�»raF�r. r r ",ei- aT'� .., C , ■ , s ...-....+"''') „ . . -, .- ", : '' -, ' : \ . . . i+ - `8 X � ; - . o '''....--,"_-:..:,,:ri' _ \ - &T , f+" (L�t1 U aaa�Niii T ..,J $-• /y am - \ . t-+r �- ( )� M � _��'.] ( 't -Y =F 4,,,.., 3 4vY9 V V } jr „ - ___ — -- _._°____ _ _- — ______._�___ __ _ -- _ _ ___ __ _ - _ _ -- _ - PROPERTY LINE _ .a� � `� nc ■_ z t "' t __ _..� � _ _ �_ _ _ _ _ _- -__._ — �-- _— _ _ � �C � �'6'4. 1... x ° �� �, '" ',..1° om _ t „ ' <) . . ,� ,2 � , x y-r , 4 � - w ca ' z Z U r- i- t1- Q f - r ,, ✓ a w � �^ f i 3 + T o. Fr c3 �• L✓ Z. s,i ` l _ e_ ___ _ ___ _ Tom! 7d'- s�`r`'j 4 -rsE to W rr -. — ' fi t CF Ei� ter L!'�iE ,., Li 1-- .- is t I �J ttJ rr <i y},, „-,..,:,4 c� A to tt 2 [ >- . >:104 4 . ' L OADiNG AREA EXlSIING #3l�fi iD Nip Q cjr uc�i c� t' �5 SW PACWIC l�lc�t�4N,�Y I a i i yALw},p�- j � , . , Oco (^ \ I A,PPROX. 14900 SQ. FT \ r v s c� 1 �, y :k..1::: � .., ,. _,.. Jxr. � itiF �i ?i � I � �a t<i , th 'z :e M ;-° }} J M+ r -+ t . 0,„..., I� m� _y,s _- - n- cF L(�7( C7 C7 - C.L. - - 4::: 0 ��' , �uzL c �a 0 - - - 1 c� O.N. DOORS , . , rr Z LOADING DOCK m i x - v �� a 1 ' )A '- I � ` ; , z PROPOSED QUiLDING 4 p -. 39 SO. FT. c , ,� NJ i ' -- - - ; U . I x c� ` . ' ` / - R , { o.3 p al's 4rJ1 , I 320' � { 1) ce C w� o 0 vs . ' - r _ _ ________ __ _ ________ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -- PROPERTY LINE - - - - - - - — - - - -- - - - -- - __ _- -- - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - ---- - -- - - -- - _a _ r ,. �-. ZGNE "R12" _—_ ZONE "C- G" — -- - ---- -- - -- - — - - -- — - r t l� - _ - i ,.,,,.... ..1 5 , rii P PLLI�1iINt�IYI'I'E PLAN • -J SCALE 1" = 40' ; _ C �, n �,•j� - - S T " _ " - ' , f - Y ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION .. A tract of tend to th G Richatdson OQ:�ation tend Galt» Na 55 h Section 35, Township 1 South; l.a.. - Songs 3 West of tt•�o WIIIctmeila Mot ITO : in the City of Tlgc�td, Count o1 Washington and State of acorn, Li_ ' trtare psart}Cttr&rty described a3 follaw'e: tract ctercrlb3 Beginning et the So ',vest Corner of that certain tract inscribed to deed to O scar P. $ idle,. of u recorder) _-! ` - Novem 2 t91 i 6 gook Q. page 45, Washington County toed Fe:ords being e point on the East faro «; �" . ' - o Sidle( tract 2 f F AIRVA LE , a duly re6Orded subrAvis In said County: thence Sout 89' Ens alo the S uth tare of zaU W 08.0 feet to the Northea come` of that Fpi13ii1 d trt dead to Walton t, Stahl, et , ' fL >- _ wt, recorded November 22. 1065 itt E3001; 974. page 373, fiocards of Waslttngtvri County, being the true p oint begaanin of the her�itt ies A nt bed pramts s; theo South CO 1 it West along fire Earl tine Still Staid tract, 1082.3 foot to a pgi:tt cut the Ncart,ti tine of SW Mlle lee $11c�Ut; tfrcnc® South 84' i9' East abrns sa ., Worth fine 224.5 feet t9 $ point in the tenter of !twit* Highway Wrist (,formerly Te' Iqr arkige Ao1d); thetrca , along said Center line Notttt 62" 53' East a ./ led to the point of intense heft with titre Southdrly exienskkn CJ 0 = f of the West iine that contain tract d95Cr itled in deed t��_Nit am F. Waiter, et tot, t ocarded October 13, 1934 "" ' w In 0472,0k 104, page 261, Washington County head &circle; t ence 1-lorth b East along the West Tine of t-�-. 73 txtd Waller tract and. the Southerly extension than. 1011.0 :9t to a point on the South lino of scald ,$kf �� Weller thence North 89' Wet aioni said South tine t a to the point of t: eginning. °- '. _ _ _ EXCEPTING. however, i to$a two Certain parcels d tairi as d�sci a i in Ot:k 19a, page 533 31x1 k r 3i, 0 5 :f _ page 32 Deed itc>Gord3 0! Washingtat Cauryty, Oregon. �' I a 4 t f ALSALSO EXCEXCEPTING ti ►E that portion described k, deej t etotdc:d Just r, 1975 in Cool( 1024. page .. !' REVISIONS . . D 202. - . FUR1 M- i EXCEPTIN3 THEREFROM a tract of ler the George Richardson Donation Lard Cfalsn NA- 55 1 t�' t/0f • :' In S'ectiort 36, Tow 1 S nship otitl�. Flange 3 West of the t'�'iltarnetie Meridian, IA the City of rrgard, County of 0 - . , Washington and State of Oregon. afore partictttarly described es tenors: Beginning It a point on tilt Southerly vytens,'tori of the West fine of that caffein tract of land described M - deed !t1 Wtiftr nt F. Weiler. et ix*, recorded October 13, 1 939 to Suck 184, page 261. sgid point bears aloes 4CATE BY - Adended ate South 0* 11 { Q0` West 331.55 feet from a Winch iron pipe et the Southwest corner thereof: =• `...- said .. , "t t hw ste right of we' tlrenCe fdcxttl C4'_d9' W!�e� 57,49 teat to thA ttUFi p4�?t nf' aey:�ing d the herein tf$�crrlaerj veer; thence � _�.,._ � ° ..�,.. , 0' ?�97 feat to the �t a r!Y � - _ ._ South 0 1 10U' West parallpf with said iota of 1174 (halter freer. , • 1 ttng of SW ta ciil4 Highrvatt el how'eslebirshod, said point bstni,1 Q feet opposite ¢f EriOneeee COW �. y lane Station f�R.� 34+21.24; tfltir�ce So 1tfvestedy along said hlgir�att rlpiat gt way titre rurt parttti h ;` - ...._" and 64.00 feet offset frt�rri a center letta of a au 0.Z.0 sp itat curve itt tttti VA c which Chord a1C,n said right , ...... . ,_ . . of way tine beam u$otl',h 54 +23'39' West 112.411 feet to a point 50.00 feet opposite a Elinec-i a enter t,L'e Station 4 33+akit thence uh a 11.409.1$ loot rwilus ctnva to the tight, which chord bears South, 54'38'09' West 1,02 feet; an fir' C length of 1,02 ffet to the interseotton co►nt of said Nrt4ttvisestedy 694 of tivay flee With the North right of way line of SW Pfeifle St'eot a1 r►o�� deeded to yti39hitk�tun c y by =4 [ e 242 said point beir,r3 54,A0 feet opposite cf ���� ir35trumcnt to need Nile iT, 1975 in. t3ook S0 pas _ - pe g North Vhf f the N" rttt file of said RLU t fir °er'! Center t tno 9tattWt P.t.C. 353 3�i 12: the 89 4Q" st a and a a. t� . ' SW Ffeffto Street. 151.11 feet td the t dsi i'tri tt a i certain trash W -land described to decd t ti" aiter , ' V AA Stan, 9i ux, t carried Noiter? et 22.1965 in S tC 57 Page X7 fleccrrds of WBstrtitgton Cti =tyt thence DATE:: ; ��'�� ! .. North 4`29 8s( ato;x3 aid Stalrl's East ,ir@ 23,019 Seat; thence South l33.49'QO' East 242 faro tC the free paint of beginning. J ta. _ - 9 , 01 .: , 020 Q It ,,,.. "... - -- - . .� r . a . .' ... v -r-, 'M ^+� TM- . ,"°f=t- - .... -7'.....Z.-7.'' `i - T'�""."�,.�-- d ` r °' �' = �+°'?Z._,_ it'e'ms �', - T-^. .. - .,y, ..Z = :s -. _ ,-. Y`Y --'. �^ - - .r. _.s:..�. _- 'r"�"..� ^[._._, _ _ _ - - HO+rt," '.Y, z9M1.. -: rv c s r. .,t '„Y,'ib t• -'tl= de[ a"I6�Sx - t �.~ .. r- v _� y .._v-- ,- m- .a+�,'e -, e_. r -". « -.. _.-. •cn., -- "�+�'se ..� ,�'-_ `u•_ �''.^ ."�,. ' '-i - _ ,° _ � - _ ..e.,..,..., ,� �, � w-- a :s' 'f€, - :-.. C,3:�r �r -- _s'� -���; ,.- s- .- �.-,.. .�. -�_ ,.. -gin -. ..- .� -.a-.. �_-� .�- ... »-.. ;--�'+ +_-- �'^'�. _'�`.., � -,e,.- NW1 /4SEI /4 SECTION 36 T1S RIW W.M. I S I 36 DD WASHING T N COUNTY GREG 314 hGhTh NE . RICHARSON L.0 , _ I "AL HJINT S ALE I��- IOO SGVTH LINE T ST TT�LC 3 J I, SEE MAP ISI 36AC 5'RAI -1 _L— `'" 4T- ' "v E 1 58:^ ^G °E ' 816 7 - - IE00 - 1700 3584 1 21 1 I a 6 I Sb8 ° 03'10 "E 3U <I �r F 7 Ac `' ,d ,p 29 A c w 1 N E CUR G RICHARDSON a w CANCELLED TAX LOTS v, F t' ill m° p • I r- r I \ DLC 55 10,300,400,100- AI,102, I'J .1 & S N 0 1 ° ; c o - -_ h E 4' l"K lf j1 1500 ;# 4 ;� W 1800 16,az I 1 1 -) (( I �o Ac 41, > 011 29 Ac 0 WI , r ne tt ter/ J n r in _ t u f < I , o t - - - - - -- — - - -- fF f � ° N \ tiv � � a 0 / I `0 • �/ � 1400 11 179 2 201 1 J 26 A: Y I d 000 /0.09AC. I I \ ° o�� m � r rw �p • I 1 5Q/ c �. I \ 5 a I I I S86°19E I / v Ico L 587 ` F 1 3.9.4c 1300 = 1_ 2000 \ \ '' 0 i 1 26Ac to I \ o\ gyp.. 1 \ s r r 1 V .29 Ac r.- 3�\ GS O °G �+ ° � ) ii -- ft { 179 2 \ \ ' s ) I2Jv v 1692 I 'o > 26.4c + 2100 ' 1- \ a s \ I' l 0 1 1 . 29Ac Y� \ > - — I n r . o �sr� 1 9 19 0 \ e •O8Ac Hoc, ` � �S 2200 169 n I \ , �� \e � .� �\ \ 26Ac 29 Ac ,\ \ a 0 • ��� \ in v r r r 0 \ f � g \ ` V 1 SECOR 0 ` 9 1 N 89 ° 0C'K - _ D J NELSON 332/129 - 1 W to 9 � ��± IJOU 6 2300 S89 ° 00 . E - 793 1 1 . a ' / U I OF Ac 44.4c 192 0 0 m l 2 x , / V - °- I I +,'' 6 19 2 0 1 S89 ° 00'E a y /\ 501 N '`' / 00Ac IC) / \ N C 5.13 m 1 ,968 a SEE MAP N, f N 0 I �' � col' o g IS 36C A N See C.S.10679 r , / . � • Izo 3 I R°0" .. 500 ° i w ew4e' w 1 S R R h. x z , a ° 70.47 0 _; S 59 ° 00'E .70 Ac y l 1 900 l " 500A1 500A1 200 sir• N o ,N / 1:2 .24 Ac � I .35 Ac '01j, p 7 9 0 200M -I 1 - I 800 160 o °m • CS 10381 �� a 0 - ,,,, r, 2 4 Ac n1 ,cn 0 0 F w 'D �v , 0 O A r- I ~ `fi A 1" 1 " 700 60 1 2 V w m 62Ac cb 700A1 P ° < 0 I 3 0 9 R o 0 2 �i �'� { � n 6� Y �`' Ao FOR ASSESSMENT Ir _ 3 "ylA3 , � 6 A ° PURPOSES ONLY I 2 1.- DO NOT RELY ON 689 00 ; I 11 aA 0 5 S 7,9 3A 0 s\ 2600 FOR ANY OTHER USE 600 Q 2 __ ` A0 ro 507Ac. SEE MAP 2iAc : i i:z -.- o o I S136DC R o0 ° - ∎ 0 0 " 9. 2602 2 �; ,''� o 260 = / /7A / 56 0 / / N ' \ 671 34Ac • i ° 0`4 ' � 0 M ,I / ° G� ° 7. 60 0 ‘P 0 r 6 ; J p \\ ' 4 , n r O 0 ° y P R 9 ° z r Z V o N G 43 � 2 e9 Za CS 10413 °- rc J ti 2502 a° o . s a e `0 30Ac a 0 M6 � 0 "' ,,, • • 1 'g 2 5 0 0 � *. t � - - I . 4 /Ac. +J � ° 0 o O 0 M 62°44 IO z C S (0488 8 3 -1`.- Q 0- a 40 N. O O ? Z m W • 1 2400 /4 0 — — — o I /14A N o-2 f z —- IT M r� 0 / f N I w �M�MS U FOR REMAINDER .m gi cA 80 .00 5423 — 5 ER / / r bF TAX -LOT 0 09°30'E 0 • 0 (n r 2 la $EE MAP m - W 2501 II3 1 36DC N X V 1D en I .69Ac. 4 40 M r IM "' i'' S9 q I R Ili y N W M a ; N O 1'. W a O o m O 4 1'6 • a o I 0 N m o a 0 3 \ `G 6 p N I N Z s r,‘ r fr IC) TIGARD 5 _ ' . SEE MA P 1 St 3 6 D �3 6 89 ° 30' 0 I E J / IS 36D \ / I �/ .,0',.. / �`M ATCH LI - ---V � L4,6)/ 3 r1 SE I /4SWI /4 SECTION 36 TIS RI W.M. CO La 1 141 1 1 1 1 111E1 1 N I G Ok.LLL =w WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SCALE I 100' I S ( 36 C D Q \ IN111AL PUIN1 � Si. CON SEE MAP(I 36C / V) G I ,(FRIENDLY ACRES (� Q /J. WURZ Q A p o $ ., (O} � NE C UR. , 5 \`� T S85 ° 26'E T S N T T� CH�FAfFLNWCO PFAFFLE c 975 3 89 °4B'E STREET it, X , ,z> , � P 1401 842 72 TO N W CON H EFAFFLL T HAMMER � � , � V- / 3lAc 12 9 85 I oe85 500 130 03 1 401 100 118 84-t97 152 16 a I98.70 476 1 • zoo - -- , o• ,c, ' ' \` / 600 AC l04Ac I 34 Ac 300 64-4097 200 60 102 101 / 224 t SE COk I .74Ac 87 Ac In .4 .69Ac. 33Ac / - 1400 — 1 s o s • - — rE L KEAS --ii: / ° A \ , B8 AC N / o I - N F •� 2Ati9V `t ;2 � 1400AI / o is �, 1n I N ( / CANCELLED TAX LOTS 1 O ' co co N 400, 700, 800, 900, 1500 A -1, rn a in in N � � y y I 500 QQ � ice, 1801, 1802, 2001, 2002 W _ 100 / o p • , 88Ac a O N N p B h .r \ \ ' o\ a m a ° � _ WO �. e " � b� Z ci CC 0 To M 1 1� NI tC CO 402 1a N CO 47Ac 1 G 5 `' ` \ 0 9 . ,x ` \ N ° ° M N 7;41 ' 1 0 .5 74c w o _ N N N 1- 1 , O 0 ° A Z K U) I 1600 0 152.16 0 1 2 I. 0 8 3108 �O m h 0 ` A O 454c > o 116 -- � 1300 ' 3 m Al O 0 r' N 3/ A c. � \A t o .0 0 r ° r N Z LP W A9• ii N 0 130 03 277 130 03 42,Q3 1• 1j Z 1 700 Ja ° O- ' '6E 1 1 N89° 4203 v Sh .be '5\ O 9ol m N 62� 1501 1000 H O 0 I1 X 0 5 g e 1 / 94 Ac 72 Ac i a ` do ` ye A. 994c y o 1 P ' h ` U � N a I - 'o . Q, 1N, w mI a 1800 � > i. s ° - O m U ' N m ,� 'I y J ° r v �� 1 900 a �� 0 0 \C7 si r - i ° I( f r J s 1 32 Ac o v'- c, ' rp \ ! EASEMENT `t o, 5. J \ p � ` - N 1001 A i Z 1 e4_4e964 a 5 0 W N° n q0 O b O ,} ■ ' .0 1001 w G ` 2,9 6 S89° 22'E WD r LP, I . In T 6 1 1 . 66 Ac \ ` c. � j 0G... -vi.,,�..'vii�i, 2 4 0 � � . t o, v rir SE cop ■ 7a 5674 218 /150 8 288/53 S 86 ° 54E '-� 1 ` D +' w+ 1b "tf ' Rf11ibWS► �iriiioivii., .. - 12 3 85 4o 26 ic At C't Ir P G � ♦ ` 42 22 NBS °22 30 W S t5 ' S 176 5 1r 9 2200 : S E c N 2087i 12808 0 �1 \ \o 60 A + p '� 7 07Ac 2 0 0 0 I s 1 0 ° 1 \Cg 7.0 11 +rr,,; 6 45.4c I ° d Ilr 1 a °es ` — a o S5 1 1'11111 '151 �� r I r I SEE MAP 1 SEE MAP � � + +,�+I� `A - - o , N IS 136D C ++ N !- CI G P� N I S I 36CC x 5 � e � + +0. p 2 s0 + I I o a + + d ��. ,z q , - ' p N C` i + + + j111r111 d C I 6 2 OT c. J e ll fill 4 5 $ 1 p f 208 71 1 1 + 1 11 N - 1 9 1 1 8 24 N _ 208 Ti _ M 1 ++ 1° ¢ CD N88 ° 15'20 "E ti — — — 344 8 1 — ---I o 1 1+ +1 + + + R' - 0 N 24 0 0 — — — — w .— _ 542 _ °� 2 et 4 1 00 _ ° 6 3 ( ' ) w ♦ 0, N pr , r °' `0 1 8 1 41.3 6 ., CO I ° �o N8B °52 72 h o 2500 1.1-1 � '� 7 4000 a 31 ss O W co - -� . 4 ` N 4 n n / a r- r , � 1 7 1 5 5 9 5 6 L' 1 h 3 OOA c P. 99 86 2 a N N 2600 4 25 45 00 3 9 < , . 3 U,) C ° 0 4 '. (C S. 24,389) - ° CO - � 0 - 0 (C. S. 24,973) 0 — n o o r o Z 6 1 31.51 ' N , i k (C S. 25,160) w 124,49 3 4 N ...i., k ti 3800 N 27 -- -- _ _ _3 44. 8 2 _ _ • 0 v f N ....0 � le N N cr, in N N Q 142.97 4 15 l 641 O — t o N o 3700 =J 2800 N ; v N D o :. 1n V/ o , o 1 i= 5 Y 14 n I 4 3 4,' 13 7 7 6 ~ � Q 12 3 1 3 M U , p �3 8 \ W 360 `�^ 2900 N o Zz I t'� ryJ r�:� • 116 24 6 0 n 13 147.49 ' 0 cr 3500 N �° �= N88 ° 1620 E `� 1 h 3000 N 1 '_" 1 34 4 8 3 4. ' ` so o k - - o 1 01 4 5 7 p w N p� 1 2 Z 4 89°52'E 0 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 3 N 3400 N. -='-. s 4 s2 E 0 m m 3 4 6 ; •" —, ` ,� m DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE $ n NIA °0�° 10 o LL f � r 8 8 t PI J� J 30 � • e 1 4 • E k r3 5 6 2 6 m l 0 E '10 ! � N1 ° o I I a s $11 03 83 .C9 11 gb 2006 - 9 46 66 2'551 3100 11.• S9 7oAC N 3300 .W 0 3200 ' ° o " N • 2005 0 a ` ° a 4) .60Ac .z. ' �.,._� 2004 s •1° s � 1 01 $ 8 . 13 8 0 9 2 ' SEE MAP t• ti 07Ac • >< INITIAL POINT 321 86 ,, N W COR. • A R D a '- TWIN OAKS 2S1 1 BA fTURNBOW 180/331 530 54 865 ° ql'E 538 ' S S I 36C a .c NEI /4SWI /4 SECTION 36TIS RIW W.M. ISI 36CA m 'WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON 4 4 3 > SCALE 1 :10 r . j 1� (/ _ . .... .., si mac wM..n+eue ?m+nnHu^iT - a ,. , a : •:.a. r , - ..A:«". , r .. , . ...... ,n x.,, . . ... _ .....Y ..,. - ...m. R ., c , . , *' a -t .r w x r a:' . S SEE M AF ti CANCELLED TAX LOTS ° ^ E,.;,:;„ Qtr%// / / / / /� / /� ./ / / / /// -F/43 6 8 D '. / //,/ ' ev/ ' // �/ %' J� S . ° ` F" o ff 99�;G c�� E 734 6G o 1900, 3400,2600, 2200 ST PLUG, M N 4200, 5200, 200, 300, 2004, • G B ice• R " p � 4529 O 85 o 85 O 85 71 k l h \ � 71 85 8540 • • II 2005 ,70I, 6200, 6300, 6400, 6500, 21 00 , 2008 R-15 R I E F- R 6 100 6600 , 6700,6800, 4800, I r I / J /�+ ( 1 2/Ac 5600 w 00 I 5700 5800 5900 6000 690 70 0 0 7100 3 JYj : J G r T) 23. 64J NE CDR '< p m - J ' SAX ai O 36 0 c, 0 O U O C M /� r -)) 66/479 r , a ° 7 6 g 3 a m N _ A\ J 1 a o r -� N in TRACT u T LIN o ° J R Y NOR7 LINE GEORGE RICK ARDSON D C 55 85 85 Y 85H THOMAS B STOT C 87 N0 53 85 B 61 N ' IN TI L . v .,, 8 : Y; 6 3 a A O 7487 B9 83 9710 o? O O O L 444 80 20 86 1 124 67 594 POINT O. w 2000 .8 ___ 2B9 2207 2206 22 05 N "22 W S TORM DETENTION 8 ` I I w ° I I / STRAP IRON /I w .. V) w c. 2 /A o o ; 6100 \--t-; ° ' j '" ~ \t v r . 8 ( 4 100 PARK 0 I m N m f, o r- - ` 6 i ° 5 °� N89 °4B'w ? 5 500 9 10 �I 1I / 12 m `; 1 13 �� 7 - o P bo 83. O Z n n \ R�25 t Q sir, �R =25 14 s9 xsop a 2 203 2007 m 8 � -� 9 ° 70 00 37 07 • 9 ti 6 1 Op 38AC M O 9� 1 M 2 0 44 80 1 55.20 �1 w O ' \ 61 119 2l / \ 1 / (. ° 25 „J00 , , O 37 76 0 0� I S G a6 `°� i — � / N N 89 4 W • 05 3 ' 0 • 3 O ri • """ ��� m n : m � oTHORN STREET g �m 2009 79 --INITIAL PT \ � 6 _ _ v > N _ 96 — ° � ' 15 708/110 �li n 121 06 m 997/227 3 C R N 2275 \ N rc S 84' 37 • ' .3v Ac. i' � . R , B ISLAND & r E 3 TR C is &/ 0 Q 14066 12537 •A. 2 202 ¢ �' ''t 8 v: �\ 116 1 �� "' 96 --T' — — - 2 2 08 pY +6r� . �? 137 79 °' W •a 9 . g.1 _ N y o M• r 2 > - 6 ' -1- 20 0p O 8 0°1 w " N89° 45'W 2006 z, N 69 ° 56 09 E 260 \ p o �� 0 I 135 37 c ° , 431 w I F" I� `l H I 0 �� N 1n 13537 6- 2201 24A v S 89 tO oD N 89 W b' 8 fo ' N Q 1 't'i�1J ,;; ; ;," , o,,, o m ° 2209 0 z m a T Z 8 16 a c ° 5 0 1 1 5 8 9° 4 3' 6 y 2003 'V ,r 9 g I ` E ' '1 37.79 " ' r � N o a r r �� 13 2001. 11 N B9 ° 16'58' W 600 M � \)3gE r 47 00 10 ���� 2CE 6 294 [ 0 „77 m '' / (NI m , 1 5 0 0 � 3E 74 n N 1=```) N r- 0 o 160 1704 Q c ° ._ - 9 89 Ac 5.8 /Ac i /.34Ac ' N n 23001 \,. of 1 400 o r w c i„5,; 26a 4600 2002 13'.37 n 6 to 2400 N $ 0. - 0 n n 2 - - W w •8 ..u, 25 1'• 4500 N N ■ I n N 89 49' E 2 M 500 � � �— 2500 r w^'� `O 206 3 0 137 T9 N ° 720 ° 1505 I 1993 1� l_, M ` � 88Ac SEE MAP Kt 24 4400 0 7.79 4) 1 3 - o - e ° M IS136DB -- - - - - -- _ 7300 "' a a 2 5 2 ~ Z N 0 7 - 1 3779 m ,r, / l v `-, B779 ` 600 m -r t n , N89 °49 E 2 3 4300 49 00 ` 0 SEE MAP 2700 r n n ri 0.1 r t` - I S 1 3606 io —I in 0 5 4 Y 1` r Z - � 0 206 22 4201 _ -_ 6 , -, :. ,J -i 7- a , / v 1 m- '' 702 . ° 1504 2 800 n tf) n 15827 M J. /8AC. - 794c S 89 °0'E S E. COR r 5000 n ; "N 101 0 WF WELLER (--) _6 — — O a _ 132.69 G o �6r 8 184/261 21 4100 -- — n /� 12 .0- 60 — _ N I/ i I r',T P01NT v 12 a 2900 n LLB F ;aii VgLE ° 3 65 1°' m /- - 1 r 7 �51 }1 .. cr. 00 co h I 8 0 s� —rr W 28 /469 MORRIS .29Ac. N89 0'W 20 400J w , 34 Ac. o 1800 _ L = 800 1416 M - 744c. 3000 E_ a LLB � , 0") 8 ~ - 3A W W FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY Ar (CS 13,sss) z ° 15 03 - - DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE 13 390 0 N• 90.4c o 0 3100 — L) 0 5201 900 M Z Z • r- r- le ,24 Ac ° .2.3 Ac io 45 in in 9 • ° 0 n n 0 0 ° m 18 3800 0 0 m � a 5300 3200 - -- —. — -�.• 44 Ac (0 0 0 3 ti L1_, n 10 .:c 1616 S 68 ° 17 " 1 n n ° 110 96 m _ �� ° n ° 3700 - - - -_— �? i o o° 0 1502 ✓ 1501 ` � c n U-6\ - - 53Ac. 77Ac t 1-, r` ° o n II 5402 23Ac o 1 ° W S139°49' 00" 242,07 S749 O 16 3600 R /7Ac. °n co m o 3301 8,.., ° " y , o `� z ro 1 601 ° 0 M ° o 00 ° 0 5401 0° J 3 ? . r ° , /20 Ac N = " 12 23 - on e ``�,� co 85 0 54 00 1400 r71 ^ �' C. as G- 15 3 3500 `k , 3 _ 28 Ac. 9 `, 3300 46A 1300 (CS No 11,530) b 8 2 X m o r- r` o o r, 2 , Cs CV a ` 0 0 - o o - a0 - 9 INITIAL POINT - - 0 FRIENDLY ACRES 29 \` 588°39' 00"E p C. .Ory‘� 11a 3B 3 2 N88 B 2245 6 , 9 t6* �1 b9 -42469 111 II4 38 129 '0 / 1 A - s 9 � 4 3 1 9 6 89 46196 1 2 5 6 0 2 ( 6 6 121 I !" !! S 0 NBB °52'N 320 76 669 ° 17'E J �TO PUBLIC 1029/202 Q < -i, S•w• PFAFFLE FFL E SBB °I7'r P4‘‘ 0 / C.R 975 STREET .7 60 FAG TIGARD II SEE MAP l>G i' 15 I 36CA • ISI 36CD / Y /' F c . 8UIL iN COLUM/4 . , r .E G Q- , - 6 META1. STUDS -1 oc W T I, A TEI;NT $ARS aY. s.l _M. , HAi OU - ` , - _ {2} . LAYERS 58 TAPE "x" EACH SIDE OF INT . ,3fi _ AL HAZARDOUS a GYP $C�ARe ©A sloE 6 : - : " STORAGE MATERIAL ' {`' f CONC PI R 3 a i }_ i METAL STING WALL COLUMNS 1 cOL4MN HAZAtDOUS _., ;a` t STORAGE 14 ' : ` BY S•B,M. �--- .-- _ �. _ �. , MATERIAL , k ,..,k- �� v HIGH CONC CURB W/ - - ,/ {�) #4 CONT. TOP & BQT S1'ORAf „ = • /4 cI�AMFE o � ,Nr {sE t: r , � " 12' x12 CONC. PIER BLDG COLUMN �_� : >�LA FpE� OCAIUN) & 7" HOOK ON SLAB STEEL 4) 5 OOV�'EI.S BY S PLAT NL WALL JOINT �`` ` TYPICAL �4) TIES WAREHOUSE � . 9 MEMBRANE -SEE r - MEMBRANE - SEE DETAIL 6" CONC CURB ALL AROUND P IER �c 1 1 Y V d - __ - B V 1 *EQ �C3P 8c fO TQM: ...... :,.X4:6,11-411,11.4740:;* . a 0 � ; 1 �8 - RA DIUS, I EV 112 4 ; ' M FLA�I'ING r ; _ .. STQP' REINF> EACH SIDE; t • _ - 6" CGNC SL ,A.Q _ * - - _ _ _ _ - max`—•- F r•4 r �j a. j , ,� ,� • GN €. 6_ TRACK t- v.t !axe a!ft 6" SLAB '° s - is 2 le rJ _ r ... - ., 6 W/ #4 T &B 1'r-14' .'. --___ RAT SLAB r y m osvT� M - -- _ I{? QN EgOR $TEES. - 3x4 48 oc q ` RAT 2 A ..2 ,., , 8" LONG CAR SOARD G _ D R 149 1 4 1 - PV ' .: t ., , ,., .,� A TER , S N ' . -' s lEE � h Tic S CE , r R , , FM :3N WALL 6 1/2 DEEP ( Z r^ - � v _ , I GRID LINE ® ONLY - T SLAB RElN�. EACH $ DE WITHIN 12 HRS OF PORI S OP - .t _ 6" CONC SLAB -SEE j � $L AB. i 33 1 p1 '' y CGNC TIE SEAM BET WEEN WALLS T N = i FLOOR PLAN FOR �° • ® - 4 ; ; 4 ` x ' 8 x12 WI DE GONT FIG 2 CLEA' , , W 5 CONT.. STD HOOK v ---ter- cr �- : - rs_ .,�- „- �, :. -� REINFOR :. 0 - s TO PIERS AT EA END (/ �] C� C d O _ 6 Si ._ 8 - G t 14 "x GRADE. BM �, `° q ENGINEERED FILL SEE DETAIL 5/6.2 Q 1Q" 10' 2- RA€ SEA13 x4' -4" .4 oc W/ `� ' e ( 4 ) #6 CdN TSB f f y (� BRANE O1 fVT G084AftD OR f CONC PIER C� COLUNS . O Q C� ( v Q Q 0 O (��-� O q `� J � A P A€ C 1 18 COMPATIBLE Wf STORED LA STIC S LEEVE CENTER C GNC TI E BEAMS BETWEEN WALLS _ CHEMICALS. EXTEND UP �' �` ` - 7 ,. FOOTING' M =SIDE..TO MAIN FLOOR N OTE: USE COLO JOINTS IN ONE g. F� p � • g x12 WOE GGN FTG G f?7'�G ELEVATIONP` •d / (2) ( SEE PLAN - • - DIRECTION & ,COLD JOIN TS I , °s #;� - W 2 #5 CON € , STO HOOK TO PIERS AT EA END) OR WET JOINTS did THE OTHER Q �. ,�' �' t s N 4� d 1 1 1 N i -4 NO SG E 4 A c, ,,, ,.. 1 1 �. _ —0 Q WALL FA IL : °� COLUMN @ • • HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IAL TORAG INTERIOR IO: WALL FOOT . , TAIL CONCRETE . UCTI N JOINTS � N a. c , , --_- -- METAL CAP - C4x5 4 CONTINUOUS _ - � _ , . " . ` , . .. � . c,, � — 4x5.4 CONTINUOUS , - - 1 2 3/4 1 " 2 3/4" _ - 4" SM TRACK /2 k /,� _METAL SlbiNG 1 1/2 E ; 1 0 1 METAL SIDING M 4,. STEEL STUDS 0 24" oc 2 1 / 2 _ ix - cif 2 LAYERS 5 8" TYPE " X" 2 1/2" i 4 �' METAL CAP , - ( ) / 1 1 2 :. New CRICKET, ROOF GYP BOARD _EA SIDE / _� ° , DRAINS Sc OVERFLGINW4x1 FOR POST w " c 10 oc « t7 ` AtNS >' 4 u. - 6" TRACK - �► -- -- FLEXIBLE FLASHING BY S.B.M. . / 3/ �/ I 01 `� 40 , l 7 < , : v R EAVE STRUT METAL SIDING METAL SPDIN�, (} EXISTING F _ , ,,, :, • TOP O F SLAB, &� ' L ! o M ELEV. VAR' =ES 1 �! `: . ROOF FRAMING - ,��,' = =' --: E`11 METAL ROOFING I " I SEE FLGGR FERN 2.4-4 c7 ((,0.1) 3 A j v - _- . F, �, Fox #4 8' S , v. • C� j j, ° L /4 8x1 -O ®,h 13 ,„ 1 - --`° w/ (4) 5 /8 W.A. c # _ _ >Q ' : E, I _ _ i L 1 G BY S _...., - .__. F A >iN 8 M --_ -- _ _. -`" -� _= J '_J A r _ T A 1 -- - - __ _ 'MEMBRANE LEAK PROOF BftANE ., �_.._ 2 RAT SLAB $ E FIRE SLOP I I _ . �._ _ CGtfPATI L ��►/ ST E y 40' c c, M AX. E XISTING WALL �° C HEMICAL S. s . , 6" TRACK x .1 8"x12" TIE BEAM r , STEEL RAMES PURL IN BY S M. " r 12 „ (2) CUNT, ATTACH ONE STUD TO ACH Pt'RLIN ►'V/ - . ` ( 4 ) # 1 2 SCREWS EXISTING CONC. WALL 2 GAP R 6" METAL. siLIGS V/ " " I SEAM ALL EXISTING NEW bG►�N SP OUT (2) LAYE RS, 5/8 TYPE X ; • HOLES Sc ALL PIPE GYP. BOARD ON EA SIDE. s 6" TRACK x i , F'ENE7RA1 ONS 1 1 '-- 0 " 1".=1.--D" _ • 1" =1 -Q" STQ 1" 1`-q ". DETAIL @ XI TING WALL PARAPET WALL POST DETAIL PARAPET TAIL N W WALL - m T • -TAIL PARAPET WALE. 0 , , (% i TYPICAL. • S , . - 0 Q' - ANGELES 18HDS550 STEEL _ v _ STUDS 16" oc U (f) 0 ; q O N 80TH SIDES OF STUDS U) - : .. :: 0 ■ c ! lablill■- ( 2) LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "X" - GYP BOARD. t G ,?c� R "� t1 ?tJ a rif _ . , fl: 3.-."' 14 <C , ,CL: a. LA:. - ' ‘ ' . , -- - i 5 1/2" STEEL TRACK . DAT Y F, 1 /4" P.A.F. 0 16" oc - _ - - - tit f i`,.4)i =93 T ,,,,u - t , 1 • EASING CONC WALL 09-30-9,4... «RAJ a 1 1 -- t4�-s4 • . RILJ . ` 1 - : . ' �:�, 11=- 9 IGLU qi -24.� '1, DRAWN: u SECTION SILL - *§ s S Fe:_M HECK D . , SIM. HEAD & JAMB �__ -- - Spa =C)I,: 3 • - r REF.:oo 1 1 r 1: ". l"`i 6 o _ - _ .,s .•.,.ate ---- - . '. , 12 -, --.., '.- .-:- ',. • ,,,. . • :- : -:: 4 NO LL All EXISTING WINDOWS NO T U 1 NAT OT - , _ - - „ - • , _ s` , • r as : , i ' ' ' = _ j ` f 8" HIGH CGNC CURB < . * - . , . °' TYPICAL, , 4 ' -0n C L B (EL. 101 -6) 4 e C ©N4 FNDN WALL, SEE & 2 . ''''' 7 .:... '` CON SA " ' 0t F0 RE INFORCI NG , 6,1 6.1 - 5' -0 LANDING / 2 HOUR '►HALL , 'r j . METAL ON R I },; T . _ DOOR CONC SLAB 1 0" S CONC FNDN WALL EXISTING 2' 0 - _ , , - SEPARATION WALL NEW 6" CONC. LANDING SLAB OPENING S {E . 0� } 1- •,t ^ r H �» t3iG y M . ' WI #3 o_1! EW ON CL 7 GONG CURB Q1 -.8 ".y '— ( H J x ;•_ 2n - - oc �- ank Ak t. , • "r DO R �� 3a r . , q H r L7 C� i 1.4- ti RN T YPE z -1 GU N EXISTING 1 >• „ _ , , _ • N . `s VERIFY W. DRAT ' BUILDING Z , , - FURNISHED N _ a • + ., A ` y 1 1 A. SLAB k r- r- J A CGNC RAMP z ix L! , t . , 100 JV V . t � $ n S TEEL 5TAIR &LANDING ClC Ly� li ! I Q 9 . g... , y ri A - . OGR t8 9 J ' - 101if' METAL WALLS ON ' IA: oc� A Law a {3 4 x . ,e��� CGNC FNDN WALL `o `f 1 F, �, - - -- :,.. ,,. „ , ' 1 , N i 6 x.: 4, F. s A WALL . . , , . - ... „ , 1 . , w „ a., - a _ ' 1 X _V,VI(E CQNT q $ !_19:._.:t1.,--...:, k. c�' - , ' CON E 1 & 2 _ , H �'� '': ', _ .et _ G � DINGS. E 4 � DRAIN TO TRUCK 1 ' . .;: ' ` t 6 . 1 - 6.1 , _ , . _ . DOCK FNDN WAL PLAN FLOOR INN6131= _ _ Y sg,,,, f� SECTION —A 4y ' y a �l� H N i n F- q » t 1 , . M r LJ L Z 1 O R MP .� � A 1 1 -0 . 1 1 -o e t k :- - : - T Iii WALL - FOOTING TAIL- 1 V LAW it SAL ' M _ co 11 d M x� O to Y F 4 N tJ t. R T N O M c- n SLAB M �. •, R 2 MIN.) GRADE t�E • P , STEEL RAILING` A 1 '• CHAMFER CHAMFER T� 1 - { _ _ S EA - SECTION EDGES EDGES l CURBS A £3 0 VE : ,_m,_ -_.m. a ,"- ' ;' 2,5� \� CONC. WALK W/ __ ' \ ® 1 B QC, E.W. _ _ .-- "` _ TYPE "H" F GT .,, • __ - Q NGS a rrrrrmTr�rmuu��rt�,ir k # CONT C� TOP • - ti 40 z ca • v : - , - = ''2" GLR • A {2 }- #4 CQNT TOP- • EQUAL �" 1 i I _ Q w M = . • ° f / #4 t 12" (3 /C - k fir - _ — _ __ — _ (.0 {. A @A !LL 1Nf CLEAN i . � * a c 1 __ _ _ _ __.. � w n M GRAVEL. �" " , „ S a �� Y \ CLEAN s _ v? y - ""_`_"'� --�-�= 1 sb DRAIN HOLES BARS - 1 2n B L �N/ E.4 (�! , �, _ n ± 8 MAX. _ �J » ;,- " S » BA %` BAR t ' : - -, : SEE ti e .. • FQOTl , C C FLOOR SLAB ' r LIJ FOOTINGS.' S 41 ' 6.1 8 6 1 �1 -a--- GN NC SLAB �� `°' a s • m c r,I TYPE A I c� O . 9 (.0- { } CONT r (3) #4 CONT FOOTINGS _ 1 h —2 SAND BED .- nix }� 5 I $ MIL VAPOR BARRIER _ 8 ' .1 -0» 1Q » 8 n f z i3 •- r 0 r ' C�zL (,,C(.- L, „: � r 0 t _ - w : - nl �' �i ''i� �7'r � ' {;; -- COMP FILL • _ 3i W �, _ fit' f� SLAB Q! o f � _ - J J . , .,-- J C)-, a L 3 ��'{ej \ I C LJ1 V �f S! A S7 ,. 7 µ { ♦ ��`) '` r # ` - , l` • _ ,j J,_,d _ fl , ,, t,r !� \_; o ..',,J n yO t J O - - \ tam Y Y , J ' M � i' r .,�, _ NORTH RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL C CONC. WALK v -4 , - , 4 -_,..— . ,,: . ; - , • ,..-0- r ,; O ,�. r O) , . ) r ) , 0 ••44.) 0 , , { �0. 00 :: � O < O TYPIC 'SECTION -- _- - "k - q..,3 .Y.1 - ti `1 -w fl •-.. 1^ ,-' s -'i /l .--.41 f ... f 1 - - : - - ' I :. 0 , J ,, r j - _ CGMPACT O FILL PE I WALL SCHEDULE 4" �2 3(,)' , x RETAINING WA ' �� SPEGIFlCA11O S :'�' _ REF "H" "W" "S" BARS "F" BARS BOT. OF FTG TOP OF WALL _ - - .' ? o')'t) 06 o r) . _ - G O 0 ‘ ,0-,,) c g t.� 01) 0 c od c o fp :f, f 0 s, ' A VARIES 3 1 q n » VARIES 100' -�" TO ■ 0 1 2 4 • f �T n -1 . - ,, 102 -0 3 FROM ' S' r1� -f�1r ,4,%l ' e N l -'," -C n \ _.) t y ` . { i, i -/ 1 \ -"1 / --)'k r J � e `�r-� � , , ��� _ 5' IQ 7' FR END = g 5' - 6 n S #4 0 12" 0/C #4 12" 0/C 95' - fi n 102' - 0 n - --- FLAN @ FOUNDATION - C 4' -6n 3, -On # 9 18" 0/C #4 0 18," 0/c 96' -6" 102' -O" ` - ' >. s NQ SCALE 1 2 ,. 1, -O„ 1 4 1 -O b.. NO CALE " , n r ._.. ... ." - .__♦...._. ,. , ,.. - _ ,. ..,"'•_••- .,..- . . . ra - r ,•• -'-- + • - � a_ -- -+- ov' �' ^ - - �"'+""..a-.- „e.,.., -c- - _ _ r „ „•_..,.... _ "__.. <._ .. „- _ _ v.. , _ __. _......_.- ,. __- ..,._..__.... _,_._ ,. .._, -. ._.�.,. ., �.. „- '-- _..... ._f.._ ___..,. _ .. ......... .. -.. .. _..P__ .. _...,._,,...,, ....._._.. -,. .,__....�.. ,_. , .. .,,. ..><. _._._. ,,, _.. .,.,.._..,,.. ....__. "___._ ,.,... .. >,... _,. ._. .....,. .....,..,.._ _,.- _...�__ .. °,...._,_,. , ._`___.. ._._.., ,...�.,... >. __..., .� ,mss , . _ : : ' . N " , LOADIN RANAF RETAIN .w LL ENLARGED S.W. CORNER PLAN , SPACING 1' 1 f' '' = DOWELS TO MATCH Q .�'�' ,� ,, — , / �. HGRiz. R €INF`. SIZE �- j - VERIFY IN FIELD , - -- c N (TYP) X CI G TYP LAP SCHEDULE U3 ' EXISTING BUILDING v ST IRRUP TIES 4d GAR TOP OTHER NOTE SIZE R S C . , ,r " HOOKS, - ° / . ■ .. ' IIIIIIIII 0 , y # 28 22 c 1 # 1 VE . 5 -YERr. # RT #5 35 27 _. 1 it - L 3x3x3�` --8 42 32 �} r a ” • 1 R , I PER D ETAIL E Y PER f DETAI F C3 .d - c� ' #7 63 48 - i �` > `' / `, ' . , , PER 13100 M FGR r' 9 4 n . i — - 1 04 80 C) i}t,_ 03 C13 3 Cs -4. : - 1 -- � --�, D -- = F3 SGH EC?1J�E_ '.�C .,,+ {Y t. 1 S ING L E L A YE R EAR SIZES D ix �- , C4 C . _ L MATCH 1$0' HOOK _ _ cv • L DOWE 5 TO L W n #14 TH RU. #: 18 10d REVISIONS HORIZ." REINF. �ZE , :'• AR j & SPACING (TYP) d DIAMETER OF R EINF B � DATE BY ti YN T USED . e MAY © BE Us - 4" trI� MASONRY , 4d M 49- ` .,�. E ( N.) LAP PER SCHEDULE 09- x - - - l.0 COLUMN UNLESS • - „ ANCHORAGE BY . . , META' ' '.. I 01-24-95 BLDG M G . , 2T VERT T a Q9 • R , _r. , , . � � OTHERWISE NUMBER D ANQ 5 �- m `' , Mii ,_ s , - SPACING OF ' ANCHOR Z - # VFRT" .. x . BOLTS AS SPECIFIED 8Y --1 n OR 1 -,1 /2d OR 1 • L=24 - MAX G, GA E g DIAMETERS a, ACTUR , n - o CHECKED: � -t, ENO Of GRADE BEAM FOR 4CQNC. DI R 5 BUsLf)ING MA'�U ♦ 1 1 /3 AG 4E T ___._ DRAWN: RA FLU { -'6 MIN. } - MAX SLOPE _ a S e o fFSET CHECKED JIB o NO E: TO $ARS' A RE HORf oNTAL REINFGRCEM NT, SQ DATE: • . 08 01 94 - , AN OF :; - - 9437 , x 12" PLACED THAT MORE THAN 1 FRESH CONCRETE I .. 1 HOOK , -, e MEMBER THE E BE DEVELOPMENT =-- GE!) A � � E CQ � IS JOB B N ` 3 CAST IN TH N!$E LO'W EVE NT LENGTH - 1 . _ OR SPLICE. R E.: 4020 , EW 6 CGNC. I+L ° SC ,A$. - - , • -SEE Ft,bOR PLAN �° , , _ )0 tIE3 . , LA Y E R - - _ _ 1 � . i 1 0 A ,�i N GA [. {r A SCL t? L . 3 N S { :w .'►1. > . ! fill IL II hi I~l li LT' i T'� �t lJ�lALL_ ING II ` , T N IR I G ` " IL 1 ! • 83es' ;3VdS -: i4Dy3 gro 03d:tiC■ °SNOavbf_Otitt$ '00ONVIp 41000 R)NVO- NJ - t itiop yyv vr s1!\-i0P e i - 6A68 >wm -- 0 - 018?m8.*.i.r , th )kw, §0-.1.t. 00 l0f4 Oa • ° • - " = .'ibttNh (,) V •,olvt\tV Ct.'t r o m01 t83.1.V 4 .-AYN HW , Sen1i31 .0-14 o'NuM.Q11O3". 1 °No NO N91S',7 ',.'- ,' , i - •- , - • - • --- *T-- 3aVdS_ :-, • ,. , ,. . „ ,,,, . otctiVit.f 1\ii Oi$*iio':wovi7ti.,• :, og64 ss” ' _ ',t 40 .Vevii.As - , - WNOLLNINN3iNi - i t ,,si•,; ;''...; MOVA , QiVei -SIVO 2' PitYcf7—"r! - -. ofs Y3 I8Vflfr Arj „--50 '':',/t+A'36ts V3 •. 30v6. ILO ;\:0:011 k-tSNIA •3NO3 1 vi10 • ( ; -N10 NO 03A1 ) ;VZ .; I3AAOQ UV 4133 321V(10S. 0'09c t 1334 3ev/1)os ?; *OS Oool. 4333,2\dilps 4 e 131.4 3eivn0S - es if JVflS o3Ntrloei 3vds _ 30S01)N3 Vlig^403 *05,600'i/131_1 3WrIQS " :$1 SV ()3.N1t1+M110 SI 3Zts 314 43pNync4oD o0HEari ..E.N?Iqencio3 LJIDdS P4 oyznii.n et).() '-, • :1 Vjeti - "1 1.I\13143AV4r • 1\1"Q" ri01 '`„ bydva s.yl\tror •cc:301A0e.1c1 = M0113A ;01.44V/i1 13M 13,11S.,3OQ3 palool NI ;11 • • • -* " ' "I" '"*" ; • • ..* A • .h t• ,1 .1,1 • S . 1.,*;. 2 . . • • • .• 1 • • A.• 0,4. • ■•■ 'XYY`i „0-.CZ 6 Sitar 'dX2 3 )VQ S_LVO Z pro) 13moK - 1331.5 '3O03 031001 tqM3A183 41i OV „t7 STI4S pNI>iedel' OV Nrld 311S NM O1-4$ SV• 3DVds ONNOvpi,:..40 ?Nartelit ,;, • Siv00 /M 03iNivfa xi* $, .....; ....- — o...... I '.. 2 £ . 2 . ■ . 2 I . 2 . . I . L.... 83es' ;3VdS -: i4Dy3 gro 03d:tiC■ °SNOavbf_Otitt$ '00ONVIp 41000 R)NVO- NJ - t itiop yyv vr s1!\-i0P e i - 6A68 >wm -- 0 - 018?m8.*.i.r , th )kw, §0-.1.t. 00 l0f4 Oa • ° • - " = .'ibttNh (,) V •,olvt\tV Ct.'t r o m01 t83.1.V 4 .-AYN HW , Sen1i31 .0-14 o'NuM.Q11O3". 1 °No NO N91S',7 ',.'- ,' , i - •- , - • - • --- *T-- 3aVdS_ :-, • ,. , ,. . „ ,,,, . otctiVit.f 1\ii Oi$*iio':wovi7ti.,• :, og64 ss” ' _ ',t 40 .Vevii.As - , - WNOLLNINN3iNi - i t ,,si•,; ;''...; MOVA , QiVei -SIVO 2' PitYcf7—"r! - -. ofs Y3 I8Vflfr Arj „--50 '':',/t+A'36ts V3 •. 30v6. ILO ;\:0:011 k-tSNIA •3NO3 1 vi10 • ( ; -N10 NO 03A1 ) ;VZ .; I3AAOQ UV 4133 321V(10S. 0'09c t 1334 3ev/1)os ?; *OS Oool. 4333,2\dilps 4 e 131.4 3eivn0S - es if JVflS o3Ntrloei 3vds _ 30S01)N3 Vlig^403 *05,600'i/131_1 3WrIQS " :$1 SV ()3.N1t1+M110 SI 3Zts 314 43pNync4oD o0HEari ..E.N?Iqencio3 LJIDdS P4 oyznii.n et).() '-, • :1 Vjeti - "1 1.I\13143AV4r • 1\1"Q" ri01 '`„ bydva s.yl\tror •cc:301A0e.1c1 = M0113A ;01.44V/i1 13M 13,11S.,3OQ3 palool NI ;11 • • • -* " ' "I" '"*" ; • • ..* A • .h t• ,1 .1,1 • S . 1.,*;. 2 . . • • • .• 1 • • A.• 0,4. • ■•■ 'XYY`i „0-.CZ 6 Sitar 'dX2 3 )VQ S_LVO Z pro) 13moK - 1331.5 '3O03 031001 tqM3A183 41i OV „t7 STI4S pNI>iedel' OV Nrld 311S NM O1-4$ SV• 3DVds ONNOvpi,:..40 ?Nartelit ,;, • Siv00 /M 03iNivfa xi* $, .....; ....- — o...... £ ......; L.... 83es' ;3VdS -: i4Dy3 gro 03d:tiC■ °SNOavbf_Otitt$ '00ONVIp 41000 R)NVO- NJ - t itiop yyv vr s1!\-i0P e i - 6A68 >wm -- 0 - 018?m8.*.i.r , th )kw, §0-.1.t. 00 l0f4 Oa • ° • - " = .'ibttNh (,) V •,olvt\tV Ct.'t r o m01 t83.1.V 4 .-AYN HW , Sen1i31 .0-14 o'NuM.Q11O3". 1 °No NO N91S',7 ',.'- ,' , i - •- , - • - • --- *T-- 3aVdS_ :-, • ,. , ,. . „ ,,,, . otctiVit.f 1\ii Oi$*iio':wovi7ti.,• :, og64 ss” ' _ ',t 40 .Vevii.As - , - WNOLLNINN3iNi - i t ,,si•,; ;''...; MOVA , QiVei -SIVO 2' PitYcf7—"r! - -. ofs Y3 I8Vflfr Arj „--50 '':',/t+A'36ts V3 •. 30v6. ILO ;\:0:011 k-tSNIA •3NO3 1 vi10 • ( ; -N10 NO 03A1 ) ;VZ .; I3AAOQ UV 4133 321V(10S. 0'09c t 1334 3ev/1)os ?; *OS Oool. 4333,2\dilps 4 e 131.4 3eivn0S - es if JVflS o3Ntrloei 3vds _ 30S01)N3 Vlig^403 *05,600'i/131_1 3WrIQS " :$1 SV ()3.N1t1+M110 SI 3Zts 314 43pNync4oD o0HEari ..E.N?Iqencio3 LJIDdS P4 oyznii.n et).() '-, • :1 Vjeti - "1 1.I\13143AV4r • 1\1"Q" ri01 '`„ bydva s.yl\tror •cc:301A0e.1c1 = M0113A ;01.44V/i1 13M 13,11S.,3OQ3 palool NI ;11 • • • -* " ' "I" '"*" ; • • ..* A • .h t• ,1 .1,1 • S . 1.,*;. 2 . . • • • .• 1 • • A.• 0,4. • ■•■ 'XYY`i „0-.CZ 6 Sitar 'dX2 3 )VQ S_LVO Z pro) 13moK - 1331.5 '3O03 031001 tqM3A183 41i OV „t7 STI4S pNI>iedel' OV Nrld 311S NM O1-4$ SV• 3DVds ONNOvpi,:..40 ?Nartelit ,;, • Siv00 /M 03iNivfa xi* $, ENG-iivEET F\LL _-__ ........ ___' '--__-� _ ' __-___ 1 ` ,��" 7���' ' � ���� .• ' • - • �m� --' " \ � ,ot, '~ °�^ � � '-\ .-----�-----'--- ---------'---_'--'�--._--'' --- � �`��r2 0 _ _ � ' & ' ' - ' � , _ e _ � . _ «p~�� **�. , *n�^�to~~� _ -- -� ----- _'- -'_- -- �' -_ � � -'-� _- - _ - 0 �-- -_--' -.-._ __ 4_-_-��--- --_- ��� � � '� �� 70-4. -041.n.-4., «�m�� *�, �. .��^�� A � ��mm. mm4.�- __--_ - � ---- ___ --- -'--'-'---�-'-'�---------------'-----' -----____ ~ ' � . � _ . _ ___. . �� - - �u� '----- �' -- --' ---~----- - -- �~ ~' --~-- -----� ~--�� '--'--'- � -_----' _ - _____ _- ___ � � �_ ° � ��w� -�� - ------ ��u���� _~. ________ _ _ __ ___ • ---�-_-__-_-____- ' _- __ ---___ ---- '..4 2" ze^ , r7 , if, crL-_ d _ _ _ _______ ' -- _'-__--__ -' ..- _- _- . - -- - -' ---._--_'_____ --� ' -�' � � - ' ''� . - _ '_----___-__'------- .-' -----� _ � � - _ - - .- _ --- _ .-_ - ._____- _ ' - ' '- ____ -' � -`- __--'_- -- -` --� ------'--------------' ----' ''------'-' _ ___ ________ - ' - .-_' - ^ �-' • 411 VU • . AL BRADFORD CONRAD CROW ENGINEERING CO. G CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS M Lite u.waoti s Aw 0 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING 11655 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OREGON Project No. 93437 • PREPARED FOR AKA BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. 10626 S.W. BARBUR BLVD PORTLAND, OREGON 97219 •>. /03201 - .• / 0/k c v' Q • J' �A • )- ,3. � r '• �� VF g v>7 Al' I i . / July 22, . �,3 2.-2.g-95 raw) 3I "6 ST FJET/1.Jo P(,' I - II A I — I B -GS Lowistes, 111.0., At ' ,c, LiFr 77', soap c µ.�`. // r a�oalusa c yr s-F►u. !l' q ^(2 A � -f1" - I -30 sc.'aar.T. , I -4 C..T p iU Mt vs DATE REVISION PAGES 10180 SW NIMBUS AVENUE • SUITE J3 • TIGARD, OR 97223 -4306 • PH (503) 639 -6601 • FAX (503) 639 -6251 • STORM DETENTION/WATER QUALITY 9.EU I S 10,4 17CSc Arri of.) Q lDb LOW EIL 2- 'bN Mov'co, 4 , ? vm PoN0 a L (Lt co i I. N 0 I- 4.tW-ER64 Z ', N e /J o I of CJZZAsra III b I S CE 1401.E Ta STATE. SYS -Feen /S A 0N� Si�E ` t� 1'L> Ck1A41 4 _ �D "TcJ ?1") v Oc 3 l µiI 'R oNTla o.r LCIJ 01 g T o C.), - T:// .) S I P M sl.OPC R u g sco -tu 4 , I, • f U M P 0L7 .STa . rn -- r .1T 1 o IJ .,I.N U J \''.;z c- u \-T s , s- 1 CO N o'0 l 4A S . EEIJ YP--(_)J I P - 12 H-A !'IDLE. T -I- +-I • f PEM s . 7`Ne. ?o pJO ,1/A S - 7Z- - 17 O JT t.-'LT r — O w... 7... '7'vE LJ .--1- ° ` -'" —r r (`..-- ,L\'-- i 1-r&.. En 44 ER l✓ /4 / sE 2u A S TAB 0. LTLaw 7 - 7:4E- L✓ q ,i% .sO --711 r /A., L 7 at T.N E s 1 — 1 - 1 t.) A S St:21 'as:, c L_O�r 7 /4E" ToAuo NAs ?r3 AJ _St ge0 'FOR- "711a GU2I t 'JEL vc='•^EPST T}4''E. ou'TL- i .y1 , a] CTVILE A■(A ' PE /S s I QE, O 4. Co 7 "F% s - sr u eR. oral, R - IE `94.0 3 . -\ ._"_\r r Et / 5: 54 111 /I 1 119:S - , "/' Sr) liv - = - P395 . redo,nsv MIM 94 33 2q ja , ; - — ` ` f ir) q•2,, ` . _ - — — --- L� 3 /¢' ORI•F‘c� W. . • dot F F � . s-Qe. .,., S " 4 , ?lac / oel Fl (.k.- Z 6 i'O IN • 11.1 LLT f''S Goo-rto� �<m� MRNt+3LL \ 3 • • Iv Pioresn, CONRADRD to ' 4` 4.- ly0 . r CROW ENGINEERING CO. ," CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS CAr - • /`��, LKf� 1". usiN.L e S 2v � I BY: - CHK: v � O t F P o 'C b.s+e Mu+ • P*� 3UIL • & DATE: - 72 -9 4 O y N C Y 13' .414 I OQ. I I (o S$ S I.7 PAC /FI C t 4WY JOB NO. 93431 R BR AO - rI 64.Q.,o . , oR., SH. I OF ,-2' // 1. f,9, 12_3 L-4 i • A I -1.4 -r 3 437 EX'T'ENDED DRY DETENTION PONDS • DESIGN CRITERIA Phosphorous Removal Efficiency. The information on page 3.11 and Figure 3.6 on page 3.12 in (MCG) above provide evidence that "extended dry detention ponds" designed to the criteria herein listed will have a phosphorous removal efficiency of 90%. (Figure 3.6 & page 3.11 attached) Design Storm. (a. I in.) The design storm for surface water quality facilities to meet the phosphorous removal . standard is the mean summertime storm event totaling 0.36 inches of precipitation falling in 4 hours with an average return► period of 96 ours. (USA, Section 7.08) Srl 0t'L.vnS i Gxc&. of C,� 11ov,�d 69,104)55 'Ttit - �� c��I'fy Pond Volume (PV). u LE s s d am* c5 Q u n ► -t• -Co, t .1 1 rn LSO Determine the required pond volume (PV) by computing the runoff volume from 100% of the proposed new impervious area during the 0.36 inch, 4 hour storm event. • (0.36 In.) (1 ft. /12 in.) ( 95 ) .S51 , sq. ft.) = 28 (v7 cu. ft. imper area pond volume �� CAIN t .-1xre ' L ; 1.6.crTh cap Outlet Release Rate (Qout). re-v,u Fr-A1/41 Calculate the outlet release rate needed to release the pond volume over a 48 hour period. Qout = ( 2-`3G7 cu. ft.) / (48 hrs. X 60 min. X 60 sec.) _ . 01 (0 c.f.s. pond volume Outlet Orifice Diameter. Determine the orifice diameter needed for the outlet release rate. Orifice Equation: Q = C "A'(2gh)SQRT • C= 0.62, g = 32.20 • h = /. S _ feet Q = , L c.f.s. Area: • A a Q /C *(2gh)SQ A sq. ft. A = pi(R)SQ Radius: R = , �oi$i" ft. R = SQKT(A /pi) Diameter: D , 0 S b I ft: D= •7 vo inches U S I /4u A' Page 6 - DA6E-A , STIOI ,1 • • b ' U " vEl -o?imi:› (► -t,.1) ph L 15.9.5• ckc. E3 Lfl`L 0 . S6-6 � - 121C.1; , Z 2• 93ac. Ale. . ?(o m are : o . L c IST j .V4-uf 31 X 1 ST1 N C .� -�-�c• : (r -AV L 1%V iw-t .g S o s 1,29 c 51.1" V-x% .s1- et- D 1 � Q.:2 n sA .9 /ULl-rt. AL. s / 20 2.‘3 6,t9 - aft. k,..Q G. SLOP E - FL M r 2 k / • 1Ql s-r - 7b Sat., c.\r or ,A11-0-4 - t S11(04 0 5-5 -1 - . C.. kT Irt+ G Evo of F { -=-(� I� N{t 0 U S r 716 17 - - z •■ E. Z ;r1 I h e "7.70 p �ez t -.1u M a S .$uMG = 'F16 i2 I. 4' 11-v FI'p Flo Z / c. .27 A;, I iH/I)Y C * 73 srs �� LIw.�TI�.IK.. �' Aw = .q t- U. S� (Q.63) = /' 7 c- ¢,.,,, off AL BRADFORD CONRAD CROW ENGINEERING CO. CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL. ENGINEERS ,Q -14 BY: JP CHK: DATE: 4, -23-94 • JOB NO. 4V-1 SH. OF 17 R.e r..0 1- Is-95 J Fit • • • CJ1 Fr CE: FE ��� i-6pJ T10 iJ p / Q = I.33 G4s 4( �# _o 7 (( °17,7 -94,75 Z (3.2, )' U SL 5`' ve\ ce Uv� L T a7?-0 c1 Jo 7 .. O.f Z 92.1. 9 Y$' _ ' ORIf�C$ 51) oo -FI I ►J Rub AL BRADFORD CONRAD CROW ENGINEERING CO. G CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A1« BY: -A CHK: I DATE: Co - 23 JOB NO. Q,3437 SH oF . IP.t S r STORM WATER DETENTON CALCULATIONS 2/27/95 Undeveloped L 500 n 0.1 i 1.6 e 0.02 Tc 26.05601 Detention Pond Calculations Rein Int Point 1 Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow Required Time I CA . Rate cfs Vol CF Rate Volume Storage 5 3.70 2.16 7.992 2398 1.33 399 1999 10 2.80 2.16 6.048 3629 1.33 798 2831 15 2.30 2.16 4.968 4471 1.33 1197 3274 20 1.90 2.16 4.104 4925 1.33 1596 3329 25 1.60 2.16 3.456 5184 1.33 1995 3189 30 1.40 2.16 3.024 5443 1.33 2394 3049 35 1.30 2.16 2.808 5897 1.33 2793 3104 40 1.20 2.16 2.592 6221 1.33 3192 3029 45 1.10 2.16 2.376 6415 1.33 3591 2824 50 1.00 2.16 2.160 6480 1.33 3990 2490 VOLUME CALCULATIONS: SIDE SLOPE 4 WO 3 DET POND DEPTH WIDTH LENGTH WIDTH LENGTH VOLUME TOP ELEV AT DOT AT SOT AT TOP AT TOP (CF) 0.5 18 58 22 62 522 SILT 92.83 1.5 22 62 34 74 2874 W QUAL 94.33 1.1667 34 74 41.0002 81.0002 3395 ST DET 95.50 5.5 41.0002 81.0002 74.0002 114.0002 31334 FREE BD 101.00 38125.16 TOTAL 1412 CY S: • Kw. • • -P IF. 1 1 \ , , ,, . t / I 0 • — Z y ® t \„ I 0 w f o • :\ �� ns � J � , kit.;:l --:o 411t, , "\ l _ P3 co P7 C0 PL w 7 0 = 501 j i0Ytaaa 2 3 " 0 1 /k• /MAe \t A2rfs � T ` 't, -I t' (aefe., C. C I4■ Al._ /!0 000 • VP I. .3 77 I. 12 - X16 /6 Ocib .31 0 /460 c _ - 7 oop , It. o .34 Pa- ( 400 . 1C o sag A —2500 ,(l 0, 19 A 4 ZOoo . o o . Is - As I'zac. .0'3 0, 09 - - AL . Z2, 00o 0.S1 t.bt2) .. Ac?_ lo, mo .14 - 0 , 30 Al I C O oo . 3l I �, 2 L A � 4000 . oQ o t ^^ r'�Ai..: 103, 14, sk BRADFORD CONRAD AL\ CROW ENGINEERING CO. i CIVIL • S1RUC1URAL • MECHMIICAL ENGINEER! L ,l.10.- Sus. 1 N ESS SEPUIcGt BY: J TA CHK: PQOPosgE3 G=ttAim R.e_IAL T.:4,0%1,1) 1144 DATE: I_ I 11-9S IIbSS SW PAC WIC. 14(4V JOB NO. 910437 T GARQ OP SH. P C°OF • . • 0 7% PE AEs4 S CZ) = <1„6.IA SLOPE $ I2E cps? _ FI ? A2 •49 . of ( "4 _ p3 AZ- A5 o� .58 .t ( v ct _. 14 AZ, As, Akio , gl 3 ; l • oc( 12" 4' 3 ,1 — 'PS ` ' Z,Z (e , o o ( 12°4-, y iP .4.1., i. z - Z . , dos 43" I , i z- P, I4 I,, , Alb 2 M-4 . V o ` / v " 'Z.% _ fig Al Ale, A3 3, r, , C OS 1 .2 3 3 _ _____ q P 4- . 04e; 4,ss • o 10 1? 4, GA u _ Fig' 44, )kci 0, 4( • 005 g /. 1 2 PN. c P q -+- P o S, p . . 0 1 0 12 "4- 4 , Ga o 1. L...• ILL 'FILL L.114043 CGT.'FbNo F■W t No ou L „ S=- • oos 1 (." 4 'i © c„,a Z,sc -c... d I N L . e . -r FL = 9 4. o 2c, LF c° , Coos _ / oo , C t IJ -r' L 44I . lE IN 0 11,5 OUEe. k-et.., °I 5, s AL BRADFORD • CONRAD CROW ENGINEERING CO. G CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS BY: R3 CHK: I DATE: l _I 9-95 JOB NO. SH.'*,@ OF 7 . • • • VC-r" l U O U Tit ST'RUcr u — TO mo d. D E Q uFc« t- e- - Tu e T , I LI c LA.) n rJ 13t✓e Coo^R Kro. T Io l.J ITT-' ALZSA C. lJ 1 -67 (TL 1 0 F t- A-) fa0 r. Cu apEt.ry S e-i- ik.Qt , . c1 fiv J Deg si_cq AmeA A . _ 1.34 ac. + 24 ci = 4.52 cores s-r --s -4}c Y = 10 b C) WIuG -fl 3 ENO T �Z.. L o00 S. = ..m'i IJ " .40 G CCrrc .Ass uiv.e Tc .= »u Z = D ,q „IUr Us 1,4c. L /03 c (, *0, /1 1 , 2 AA "4 0‘6 OS Z = o . c, .qh, C� = CT' A - , 3 ( Ga)(4 , S's' - 0. 83 c:cs A- L.L.ue; -.9 t _ IA L.ot, L.. -rat/ Tc� , v -t- C uf. (ZZA J't r r GY 00 rk,r 1 . 33 -1 0 . a3 = 2. ice, c.-Fs b � �► 4,377.1 BRADFORD CONRAD CROW ENGINEERING CO. G CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS BY; Jf3 CHK: DATE: 4,-2.S.- ?4 JOB NO.r SH..4 or 17 �-> • • d � -FLQ,i • F'" 1 (_ ; t n 'F C uc� t +.1-1- --t "6t v a peve..LO Pe.vv;:r S = , (o7 s��ti� - 2 1 � c -�s _ C �l 2,;6 dz US— /0 " 4 "t��c C . 2SU Foe k , 010 A 8 k G) (AP = 2 ,4 0 6 - 7 1 p- � = Z 1 3 M S F a , Z , c- . 2, i — 2 A C = 5 - to _ oos UsE. S =,Oo? BRADFORD CONRAD DFO L CROW ENGINEERING CO. G CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL ENGINEERS /�•K -� BY: .. GHK: DATE: ( 1-3-94 JOB NO. 93437 SH �® OF \ • a 90 CONCRETE PIPE DESIGN MANUAL Li, .: ' 5 . , j.,. TABLE 3: FULL FLOW COEFFICIENT ' LUES ._ ..' r CIRCULAR CONCRETE PIP - ,Y Appro ' • r , ' D A R Value f Cr = 1.486 x A x R • '. " '� ` 1 • Equivn i' :,, P A rea Hydraulic ° r n 1 " ,, pipe Size Circu Diameter (Square Radius ti' • . ',;?. i "° Allis Diam" (inches) Feet) (Feet) n -0.010 n- •0.011 n' 0.012 n 0.013 11 c ti .. (inch ; 4`14 il .;.1, 8 0.349 0.167 15.8 14.3 13.1 12.1 , i�, A ;jr, 1'19 x 30 2' h . • ! " : •.) :,' i ' 22 x 34 2 ,.y. 10 0.545 0.208 C2_11_4 25.8 23.6 21.8 `;: ' W 24 x 38 31 ,V0,.. 12 0.785 0.250 46.4 42.1 38.6 35.7 :, 11 ',,, � •r 2 7 x 42 3 ,� 15 1.227 0.312 84.1 76.5 70.1 64.7 `' '� ' 29 x x 45 53 �3 '`' ' 18 1.767 0.375 137 124 114 105 N 34 i _ 34 x 53 21 2.405 0.437 206 187 172 158 t • 1 • : 38 x 60 4 ' :: •'43x68 5 • .r;• 24 3.142 0.500 294 267 245 226 ' ' 48 x 76 6 • 27 3.976 0.562 402 366 335 310 -k< 1'58101 S 3 . 7 30 4.909 0.625 533 485 444 410 ' . 63 x 98 7 i - _ 33 5 0 686 624 574 530 wi• '; : 68 x 106 f 36 7.069 0.750 ' 867 788 7 22 666 . sr ' zz2 x 113 177x . $,• 42 9.621 0.875 1308 1189 1090 1006 .1 �,` • x 128 l( i; ` ;? , , 87 x 136 �. k 48 12.566 1.000 1867 1698 1556 1436 . i : 92 1( x lA3 1 1 54 15.904 1.125 2557 2325 2131 1967 ..i's ,, ,.97 x 151 1; ' .:• i I ''; 106 x 166 I. };� „ 60 19.635 1.250 3385 3077 2821 2604 hl •' • 116 x 180 1 »r.;;ir,, . d 66 23.758 1.375 4364 3967 3636 3357 �� • , . '1,,- , 72 28.274 1.500 5504 5004 4587 4234 . 1 :1,;I'iY (: , 78 33.183 1.625 6815 6195 5679 5242 � ; Apr n r r, E q K �• ' 84 38 1 8304 7549 6920 6388 ;:o,'.,,4;.. �� ! u' '4 .' Pipe Size �� 90 44.170 1.815 9985 9078 832) 7681 f, i ,i, , • R x S (� - '� ti �� ' '=' 10780 9878 9119 1 • 1, ;.1 (Inches) - 0 4 ,' 96 50.266 2.000 11850 : i" 102 56.745 2.125 13940 12670 11620 10720 . ) 13% x 22 ti` ,'• ., :i •t %t5 15%x26 'r, , 6 230 14760 13530 12490 r 108 63.617 2.250 16230 . • y„ ' 221 x 36'/. „,r 18 x 28% % . ..', ,, r5 ' ;V :,. , 114 70.882 2.375 18750 17040 15620 14420 , , 1 20 78.540 2.500 21500 19540 17920 16540 t .. 26% x 433'4 "iGi114;,y I:ya 31416x 51 ,1'G1.y) ; rr 126 86.590 2.625 24480 22260 20400 18830 . ' '• 36 x 58 • '! . 40 x 65 ` * 1 1 t 132 95.033 2.750 27720 25200 23100 21330 ,r� 45 x 73 . ; 41::!, 138 103.870 2.875 31210 28370 26010 24010 1 , . ,'.� 54 x 88 1•' 144 113.100 3.000 34960 31780 29130 26890 - .:14 !a•„ 62 x 102 'j. •' : r ' 72 x 115 77 x 122 : ■ ; 87 x 138 ,i . .: • 3 1` � _.. 77• ■ ur ' 'cW0 4 1` x , i �j,, • , . ry ,. ∎r,it { .'. • _. mot ik t 1.ii.ka21Jus,' S a li_.1..,,..• _ _ ...t u.. , , .. _ _ .. _ . . . . • . , • INTENSITY • DURATION CURVE 80 ZONE Iti 2 YR•1 HR INTENSITY 0.5 INCHES PER HOUR + 7 =ESiriBElIEBIm ® ®R :-- : - - -_. - :. --- : MEMINEVE = == O • 6.0 __. alg MIKORCI IM EMENEMIMalg N 5.0 anaaalaa�sa =WU r /f IR M���MN q �«■■ ■ � � 4.0 �� a A OY�� t 1�t a a�� :Manaus ( ■��tmMt tlMfi�at•firNY ■�Yti w 1 M �ifal slYlan■l �� �gq == = �AY� ■■� 10 s/Nafa• ■ia)i�lanti!l us alals�a =w_ _____ asl 3.0 L aM r : y Pai� . 4• - r■Z.."V' 7 --: __`'Sj711--ggliMEE-1-11 - "Mili a MF :-11 ... = MIE := EaSEEME • mismsle= _ = sU /� ■f�fi.. 1 = al . smsEe m ns M a aaan�a�a>raw�aaww■���aawaa � � � asw s--w_>is■■s■�arn,wwws+s ...... � 70 �� T� ■■s � paw i■Nii __ ntin0� ==: Y01 k d ■ M■■ �M taW AY - ■flan: • 0 2.0 sa— wn ammas+s+■a • — v U - e ■w v � '++n l rsimm. smists s t ssaa�ws+r■ s■s� s+t s l I :�� ■ ■ Itl1■�mlll/i11BO -NM j /llllll1111 ■MINI■1lll • e = ■1■/MM$JI asinsu ismasaI. roman �\ ■ • -mi � . _' f �lllOfR1i11111mumnl ammonismonnummonne mi MU111nRM MI �A■n!� . nimm ■ mous��ummulemavununsimmunl -.mum i � � a� uilu namnumminn n o � y ■■■■�aaurrrrn��runmrnnr ��uiwnummnmll■ n � �,! � nun � � � CD 1- , 0 ■■■■u n ��®® mui i �mu 'I� oIa■■■■1I1rrrriii N ' J 0.9 ei_ aMal ___ � �n�0 ° ''—' �.- 0.8 t - ---1 _ _ _ __ g .MIME gg= IERM atO g � _ M cr 0.6 ._.. m � ?� �s'sllwla. =slr= � c�i zs zs • 0.3 _m --=-,e- .. . :.: - = M i r = r • '' IN = w ���� a : r� �� ms V n a wa ■.nwn.aa■■sa■.w ■.t =�'�' = _ _ l i ■ _ �Z� s a�sw = = ns a■ asinaant:w ns I�iinis w ■�rw MINNUiMM�lMNlnluMUN ■Mlllll MO MM�NMM MUlNIii MMI =MiMINM -; , M MMIa■MMINIRf�nla■! moillYa mailm onsiw nm Nlp/afQm m a la l �n� ' _ ■oaaaaaawmrmiaialaa�nuie naa..aaaanr�nst �" n n i .i, r un r ' i aia nu�a�Inm�N w ® ®�■■■ ■�■ r � n r.. ■■g uull • 1 1 4 5 6 7 8 y 10 15 20 25 • 30 40 50 60 70 80 100 150 200 250 C 1 - RAINFALL DURATION, minutes •