Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
SDR1994-00011
CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0011 JOANNE RYAN / BOB SMITH - OWNER THE HOLLAND INC. AND BURGERVILLE - APPLICANT APPLICATION: A request for Site Development Review approval for a 2,570 square foot, fast food restaurant with a drive through service aisle. Comprehensive Plan: C -G, (General Commercial). Zone: C -G, (General Commercial). Location: 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300). SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to certain conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE STAFF CONTACT SHALL BE MICHAEL ANDERSON OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 1. Curb and sidewalk shall be constructed along the site frontage on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department for the street improvements, including the proposed sewer and storm drain construction. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171) . 2. The site plan shall be revised to include the recommendations of the traffic engineer to provide separate left -turn and right -turn lanes exiting the site. The entrance shall be widened to a width of 34 feet for a minimum distance of 40 feet. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639 -4171) 3. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171) . NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 1 • • 4. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for the common driveway. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department. 5. Revised site and landscaping plans shall be submitted for review by the Planning Division, Staff Contact: Will D'Andrea. The revised plans shall include the following: a. Revised impervious surface / landscape calculations incorporating the driveway modifications. The minimum landscape requirement is 15 %. b. An additional 3 street trees along the frontage of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. View corridors for signs may be identified by the applicant and street tree locations may be spaced to provide the view corridor. c. Compliance with vision clearance requirements, after modification of the driveway access. d. A plan which shows compliance with Community Development Code Chapter 18.116, Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum Standard, Waste Assessment, Comprehensive Recycling Plan or Franchised Hauler Review and Sign- off. 6. The applicant shall obtain tree removal permits for trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 7. All site improvements as approved per the revised site plan. 8. No parking signs shall be installed on both sides of the main entry from Upper Boones Ferry Road leading to Sherwood Inn, signs shall state "No parking" "Fire Lane" "Towaway Zone" "ORS 98.810 - 812 "; sign locations shall require approval by the Fire Marshal's office IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 2 I • • A. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Backround: The site was previously developed with a Unocal gas station. The station has been torn down and the site is presently vacant. No developement applications were found to be on file with the City of Tigard. 2. Vicinity Information: The subject property is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of I -5 and SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. A service station is located across the service drive to the west and to the south is the Sherwood Inn and motel. These properties are zoned C -G (General Commercial). The Pacific Corporate Center subdivision is to the north across SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. The property to the west is part of the Oregon Business Park. The properties to the south and west of the site are approximately 20 to 30 feet lower in elevation than the subject site. 3. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site was previously developed with a gas station. The site is presently vacant and enclosed with a chain link fence. The site slopes to the northwest. The northeast frontage of the site is mostly covered with grasses and contains a few evergreen trees. The site consists of two tax lots of approximately 24,340 square feet. The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA drive -thru restaurant, with improvements to the access drive. The site will share the existing access drive along with the hotel, restaurant and gas station. 4. Other Staff Comments: NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 3 • • The City of Tigard Building Division has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Remove any site utilities from under the building which is being abandoned; all other site utilities are to be capped off and abandoned per city requirements. The Tigard Water Department has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The relocation of the existing fire hydrants will be approved through the Water Department; the developer is responsible for all costs associated with the relocations (if needed); fire hydrants and water meters are not allowed in paved or concrete areas; the 2" water meter on the west side of the property (near the entrance from Upper Boones Ferry Road) must be protected at all times as this water meter serves the Sherwood Inn. 5. Agency Comments: The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Relocation of the fire hydrants shall be cooperately approved by the Fire Marshall's office and the City of Tigard Water Department; no parking signs shall be installed on both sides of the main entry from Upper Boones Ferry Road leading to Sherwood Inn, signs shall state "No parking" "Fire Lane" "Towaway Zone" "ORS 98.810 -812 "; sign locations shall require approval by the Fire Marshal's office prior to construction; construction shall not impair access to Sherwood Inn or other structures. The Oregon Department of Transportation has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: The following represent ODOT'S requirements to access SW Upper Boones Ferry Road: A permit is required for all work in the state right -of -way (approach road, curb and sidewalk, etc.); Frontage improvements along the highway will be required (ie. curb and sidewalk, drainage facilites and pavement per ADA standards); On -site detention will be required if the applicant needs to connect to the state drainage system. General Telephone and Electronics has reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comments: Developer to place conduit for telephone service to GTE specifications. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 4 . . The City of Tigard Public Works, Portland General Electric, has reviewed this application and have offered no comments or objections. No other comments have been recieved. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a fast food restaurant with a drive through service aisle. A restaurant is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as Eating and Drinking Establishment. Code Section 18.62.030 allows Eating and Drinking establishments as a permitted use in the C -G zoning district. Minimum Lot Area: Section 18.62.050 states that there is no minimum lot area for parcels in the C -G zoning district. The site has an average lot width of approximately 120 feet, thereby exceeding the required 50 foot average minimum lot width. Developments within the C -G zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant is proposing approximately 6,605 square feet or 27% of the site for landscaping. The applicant has been conditioned to modify the driveway which will reduce the amount of landscaping. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan with revised landscape calculations, for review with compliance with this section. Setbacks: Section 18.62.050 states that no setbacks are required except that 20 feet shall be required where the C -G zone abuts a residential district. This site does not abut a residential district, therefore there are no applicable setbacks. The applicant is proposing a building height of 20 feet, well under the maximum 45 feet allowed. Landscaping Plan: Section 18.100.015 requires that the applicant submit a landscaping plan. This requirement has been satisfied as the applicant has submitted a plan indicating the number, type and location of trees and shrubs. Street Trees: Section 18.100.033 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large). The preliminary landscape plan shows the provision of 3 red sunset maples to be spaced 25 feet apart. The landscape plan shall be revised to include an additional 3 street trees along the frontage of SW Upper Boones Ferry NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 5 • • Road. View corridors for signs may be identified by the applicant and street tree locations may be spaced to provide the view corridor. Screening: Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. As indicated on the site plan, this requirement is satisfied. Screening of Refuse Containers and Service Facilities . Section 18.100.110(B) and (D) requires that such facilities be screened or enclosed from view by placement of a solid wood fence, masonry wall or evergreen hedge. The applicant is proposing a masonry trash enclosure, thereby satisfying this criteria. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The code provides that obstructions which may be located in this area shall be visually clear between three and eight feet in height (trees may be placed within this area provided all branches below eight feet are removed). A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. A revised site plan shall be submitted which shows that the vision clearance requirement will be satisfied after modification of the driveway access. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106.030(C) requires a minimum of one parking space for every 50 square feet of dining area, plus one space for every two employees. The site plan indicates the dining area to be approximately 780 square feet and the applicant states that there will no more than 10 employees in any given shift. The number of required parking spaces is therefore 21 spaces. The NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 6 • • applicant is proposing to provide 22 parking spaces, thereby satisfying this requirement. Section 18.106.040(A)(1) allows up to 25 of the required parking to be compact spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 2 compact spaces or only 10% compact, therefore the plan is in compliance with this section. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became effective on January 26, 1992, requires 1 disabled parking space if 1 to 25 parking spaces are provided. This site provides 22 parking spaces, thereby requiring 1 disabled parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows the provision of 1 disabled person parking space, thereby satisfying this requirement. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(P) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Two bicycle parking spaces will be required for this development. The site plan indicates the location of one bicycle rack which accomodates 4 bicycles, thereby satisfying this criteria. Access: Section 18.108.080 requires that commercial and industrial uses which require less than 100 parking spaces provide one access with a minimum access width of 30 feet and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. In addition, curbs are required as well as a five foot sidewalk. The applicant's proposal is to improve an existing driveway which already serves two additional businesses. In 1990, under SDR 89 -23, the Sherwood Inn obtained approval for an expansion of their site. Included in the variance for the Sherwood Inn application, was the approval of the use of only one driveway for the combined site at a width of 24 feet. As indicated on the preliminary site plan, the access is consistent with this requirement. Further, the applicant is being conditioned to provide turning lanes which will result in a 34 foot access width, thereby exceeding the minimum access requirements. Walkways: Section 18.108.050(A) requires that a walkway be extended from the ground floor entrance of the structure to the street which provides the required ingress and egress. The site plan indicates two walkway connections to SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. Signs: Section 18.114.130 (C) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the C -G zone. All signs shall conform to the provisions listed in this code section. NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 7 r • • All signs shall be approved through the Sign Permit process as administered by the Planning Division. Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclables Storage: Section 18.116 requires that new construction incorporates functional and adequate space for on -site storage and efficient collection of mixed solid waste and source separated recyclables prior to pick -up and removal by haulers. The applicant shall choose one of the following four methods to demonstrate compliance: Minimum standard, Waste assessment, Comprehensive recycling plan, or Franchised hauler review and sign -off. The applicant shall submit evidence or a plan which indicates compliance with this section. Tree Removal: Section 18.150 contains standards for obtaining a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter when measured four feet above the ground. This requirement will be satisfied as a tree removal permit will be required for the removal of trees with trunk diameters of six inches or more in diameter. B. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Sections 18.164.030 (E) (1) (a) (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains) shall be satisfied as specified below: 1. STREETS: This site is located on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, at the common driveway shared by the Sherwood Inn and the adjacent Chevron gas station. SW Upper Boones Ferry Road is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as an Arterial street and has been constructed to City standards with the exception of the curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the proposed site. The applicant's preliminary site plan includes the completion of the required street improvements. The applicant has submitted a traffic study for the site, prepared by Tom R. Lancaster, P. E., dated May, 1994. The traffic report prepared for the proposed Burgerville restaurant indicates that . the site will generate approximately 94 vehicle trips per peak hour. The traffic report also indicates that the intersection presently operates at a Level of Service "D" and that with the additional traffic generated by the proposed restaurant, the Level of Service is estimated to operate at the Level "E ". The traffic report further indicates that the primary movement exiting the existing driveway onto SW Upper Boones Road is the eastbound right -turn and that to facilitate the NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 8 ' • • traffic exiting the site, the driveway should be striped with separate left -turn and right -turn only lanes. The site plan for the proposed restaurant should be revised to include these recommendations. As noted, the existing driveway serves two additional businesses. In 1990, under SDR 89 -23, the Sherwood Inn obtained approval for an expansion of their site. A condition of that approval was to re- construct the driveway with curbs and a sidewalk. The construction plan for the driveway was approved, but the permit was put in abeyance at the request of the Sherwood Inn, who wanted to defer the • construction until the development of the site now under consideration. Included in the variance for the Sherwood application, was the approval of the use of only one driveway for the combined site at a width of 24 feet. However, with this application which includes additional information by the traffic engineer, the entrance to the driveway at SW Upper Boones Ferry Road should be widened as noted above. In addition, the applicant should provide for a joint use and maintenance agreement for the driveway that enjoins all three property owners to share equally the responsibility for the maintenance in perpetuity. There are no overhead facilities along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and the street lighting has been installed. No further construction is required relative to these items. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The site served by the existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer that is located in SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. The applicant proposes constructing a new service lateral to the main. The existing sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development. 3. STORM SEWER: The existing site currently drains on the surface to the existing driveway located along the westerly side of the property. The applicant indicates on the preliminary utility plan that existing public storm drain in SW Upper Boones Ferry Road will be extended to the site and that a private underground system will be constructed to connect to pipe in the street. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 9 t • • Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Section 7.10b of the above noted Resolution and Order cites conditions under which the fee in -lieu may be accepted. Specifically, it provides, that if, "The site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on -site facility would preclude the effective development. ", the fee may apply. It is our opinion that this site is consistent with this criteria, and we recommend that a fee in -lieu be required. SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX The affected Citizen Involvement Team Representative XX Affected government agencies 6-2-/-/i/ 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. ca • The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m.0 . 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Department (639- 4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223 t� /a D d C01S -° 1 1 1 PREPARED BY: William D'Andrea DATE Assistant Planner ,j . , r 4 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewersdorff DATE Senior Planner NOTICE OF DECISION SDR 94 - 0011 BURGERVILLE USA PAGE 10 i X � �� '-'<:4 I ! -4 3, S ��' RFCD" 74TH J A • O 3I � DtlOtllltlli CO MIM 0 1 , -0 ca g ,r— _ 1p pS ,_r- Nd ._ z D z 72ND AVE { ■ i \ r I n c) 3\30'1 d m s el. ` o o z A t 9 o > 0 r ---2.________...° i Z Od0 9I- 1. Illr °14 PKWY ` D ., II m r j 1 17 ,, z o . • , 1 11 I _ 6 ,:::) __,,L___,„ • CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. :A 2S112DD -00800 2S112DD -00900 RYAN, JOANNE C FERRYMAN, H E SMITH, BOB PAMELA 9110 NE HWY 99 BY CHEVRON USA INC /PROP TAX VANCOUVER WA 98665 PO BOX 7611 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120 2S112DD -01000 2S112DD -00700 FERRYMAN, H E PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 9110 NE HWY 99 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200 -WMI VANCOUVER WA 98665 PORTLAND OR 97224 2S112DD -01400 2S112DD -01500 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P PACIFIC REALTY SOCIATES L P 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY 00 -WMI 15115 SW SE A PKWY #200 -WMI PORTLAND OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 THE HOLLAND INC JOANNE RYAN /BOB SMITH 109 W 17TH STREET 11440 SW LYNNVALE DR VANCOUVER WA 98660 PORTLAND OR 97225 _ e\. , AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard I, n1/( k , being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: (Please print) That I am a i �" - % for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ( That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: 1 C ity of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy (Public Hearing Notice /Notice of Decision) of which is attached (Marked Exhibit "A ") was mailed to each named persons at the address shown on the H attached list marked exhibit "B" on the It ^ day of \ GUA..L 19 1 , said notice NOTICE OF DECISION as hereto attached, was posted on an appropriate ` bulletin board on the (Yi^ day of vice,(_ , 19'1V ; and deposited in the United States Mail on the IS 417 day of , 19 9' postage prepaid. 4 6/91AM;i0 epared Notice ■ Sub bed and sworn /affirm to me on the �1" day of , 19 Y OFFICIAL SEAL p `' NOTARY PUBLIC -OREGON 1\10 P BL C OF ORE •N () COMMISSION NO. 0089721 1 My Commission y . fires : 7 3 MY COPIJMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 7, MS() () ' • • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: SDR 94 -0011 FILE TITLE: HOLLAND /RYAN /SMITH (Burgerville) APPLICANT: The Holland, Inc. OWNER: Joanne Ryan /Bob Smith 109 W. 17th Street 11440 SW Lynnvale Dr. Vancouver, WA 98660 Portland, OR 97225 REQUEST: A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restaurant. 6 3:z X11 APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. LOCATION: West of Interstate 5, east of SW Sequoia Parkway and south of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. 11 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300). e ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The (eneral- Gemmere+V1 zone allows Public agency and administrative services, public support f acilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, eating and drinking establishments, among other uses. CIT: East CIT REPRESENTATIVE: Joel Stevens RHONE NUMBE 2. 3-,12 -54 CHECK ALL WHICH APPLY: X STAFF DECISION COMMENTS DUE BACK TO STAFF ON 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME:7:30 ATTACHMENTS X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN X SITE PLAN OTHER: GRADING PLAN STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea - 639 -4171 V `J4t 4L42/4 • Vi 9 b �rr6� :4;2 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON S. r¢.sL lO ec.elo�pdu ec�` �v�c E APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. S. 947 OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. g�f 25212 APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: tf,tt�//� DATE: S /v/ 9 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION 1 5650 SW Upper Boones ( -----( 7 A) Application form (1) Ferry Road (B) Owner's signature /written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 251 12DD Tax Lots authorization 1 ecaS.P ee v•- .e,F7 1200 and 1300 "C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 24,140 gsf ( 56) (D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* L a q;;; Ryan & Bob L � (E) Plot plan (pre-app check list) ADDRESS 11440 SW Lynnvale Dr .PHONE Ti (F) Applicant's statement CITY Portland, OR ZIP 97225 (pre -app check list) ‘PPLICANT* The Holland, Inc. (Lessee) (G) List of property owners and IDDRESS 109 W. 17th Street PHONE 783_6052* addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Vancouver, WA ZIP 98660 / Filing fee (421.0) *When the owner and the applicant are different 1/ = J di nSO " L )eople, the applicant must be the purchaser of record t/ (3 I/v(edto j 41,.&1 'r a leasee in possession with written authorization DA�Er,DETEEINFP„TG SMGI�T rom the owner or an agent of the owner with written ) uthorization. The owner(s) mustsign this pplication in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: ubmit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Variance to the following provision(s) provision(s) of the Community Development Code. Approval Date: Construction of a 2,570 square foot Final Approval of Conditions: Burgerville USA Restaurant Planning Engineering * Portland Phone NnmhPr 0521P/13P Rev'd: 3/88 . • 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: None ' 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S),SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and • limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this S a day of 7774/7_, 19 99 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. 1:7‘46‘E' 11.1.144114-- r /7 (KSL:pm /0737P) • 411 0801 • GROUND LEASE This Ground Lease ( "Lease ") made and entered into this 14th day of March,; '\1994,;by and between Bob L. Smith and Joanne C. Ryan ; ( "Lessor ") and The Holland, Inc. ( "Lessee "). 1. AGREEMENT TO LEASE /DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: Lessor hereby leases to Lessee and Lessee hereby leases from Lessor, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, that certain real property consisting of approximately 24,300 square feet of land area located in the City of Tigard, County of Washington, State of Oregon, commonly known as 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, Tigard, Oregon, the legal description of which is marked Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein (the "Premises "). Lessor and Lessee acknowledge that the Premises are subject to an easement in favor of the adjoining restaurant and /or motel property for the purposes of maintaining existing parking and signage. Marked Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein is a sketch identifying the location of the sign posts, bollards and parking spaces that are the subject of this easement. Lessee accepts the Premises subject to said easement and the sign posts, bollards and parking spaces identified in Exhibit B. 2. TERM: a. Primary Term: The primary term of this lease shall be for a period of 20 years from the "Lease Commencement Date ". The Lease Commencement Date shall be that date upon which Lessee first opens for business to the public upon the Premises, or, that date which is 150 days from the "Turn -Over Date" (as defined in paragraph 8 of this Lease), subject only to force majeure delays, whichever first occurs. Provided however, that in the event the Lease Commencement Date occurs on other than the first day of a full calendar month, the primary term of this Lease shall be extended for a period of 20 years from that date which is the first day of the first full calendar month following the Lease Commencement Date as defined above. b. Option Term: Upon the expiration of the primary term of this Lease, the Lessee shall have the right and option to extend this Lease for three successive option terms of five years each, subject to the terms hereinafter provided, provided that Lessee shall then be current and not in default at the time of the exercise of each option herein provided (after expiration of any applicable notice and /or grace period). Said options, and each of them, are to be exercised by written notice delivered to Lessor by Lessee no less than 180 days prior to the expiration of the then expiring term, primary or option. • • . • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Lease to be executed on the date first above written. LESSOR: BOB L. SMITH , ND JOANNE C. RYAN X ' r/XL i Bob . Smith X latt. _ �. Joal- ' . Ryan LESSEE: THE HOLLAND, INC. By 4 JAJ , Ti t l e • 21 • EXHIBIT A 1 M BURTON ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors 302 Tigard Plaza • Hall Blvd. & Pacific Hwy. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 s Phone 503 - 639 -6116 • FAX 503 - 639 -6117 AUGUST 10, 1993 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR: BOB SMITH /JOANNE RYAN JOB NO. 92 -443 COMBINED DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO BOB L. SMITH, ET AL, BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN DEED RECORDS FOR SAID WASHINGTON COUNTY, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING 319.20 FEET WEST AND 729.64 FEET NORTH FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE SOUTH 82 °42'00" WEST 125.04 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 08 °30'41" WEST 134.63 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD IN THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF S.W..UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD; THENCE NORTH 54 °08'29" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE 177.61 FEET TO A 1 INCH IRON PIPE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON BY AND THROUGH ITS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 3, 1937 IN BOOK 166, PAGE 415, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 00 °00'00" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID STATE OF OREGON TRACT 221.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. REGISTERED PROFESS;: L LAND SUR'; EY Q1 OREGON JANUAF Y i? i7 DANIEL T BURTON 0248 TOGETHER WITH AN ACCESS EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE EASEMENT AREA IDENTIFIED ON EXHIBIT B ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED BY THIS REFERENCE AS IF FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN. . 1110 EXHIBIT B / / �� . � ��-\� 1 IRON PIPE 0 HELD 4;1k/ • �5� ' , • O 9°i ' � � huh � � N 4 ,�� z 1/2' IRON BAR -SENT �4 qs.• n �; 1:‘ p 5 �9 � ' W . �p Ap h Z 0 11 a K N 5g AIL a 24,'95 SQ.FT - I. O / m P / . 4 O o O h gR • t ` ` te n, • 2 Y 1; 5 9 p Z 4 0 ti S• a 6 1,• -� 5p A515- � ' � SIGN O LLARDS °o HELD to E - W ON R00 5 j IRON R0 a POSTS a i CASWELL WC N � � r 3% 4" IRON PIPE , ' I �': �� ��; HELD E. - W.. 0:28'N. ,'' � W j Z5.0 � ° / / ��5 82 �� 8so • of • % F NO 5/8" IRON ROD \W/CASWELL YPC ✓ 1 / W O )ISC I 0 "DEA, INC." � O o P N 0 d O 2 a' 0 to v PI \._ I 2 Tv a W� CZ N o co m L� s 5/8" IRON R00 v o� W /CASWELL YPC °o. \ eN . • • THE Holland, INC. THE HOLLAND CORPORATE OFFICES (206) 694 -1521 AND BURGERVILLE U.S.A. 109 WEST SEVENTEENTH STREET RESTAURANTS VANCOUVER. WASHINGTON 98660 REQUEST FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A BURGERVILLE RESTAURANT ON UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD IN TIGARD, OREGON • Presented to: City of Tigard Planning Department Presented on Behalf of: The Holland, Inc. Prepared by: Jeff Lightheart, AIA Architects Associative Beverly Bookin, AICP BRW, Inc. May 6, 1994 • • 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: The Holland, Inc. Request: Type 11 Site Development Review for a new BurgerVille Restaurant Location: 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Zoning: General Commercial (CG) Legal: 2S1 12 DD Tax Lots 1200 and 1300 Site Size: 24,340 gsf (.56 acre) 11. SUMMARY The Holland, Inc., the corporate parent of BurgerVille USA, plans to develop one of its prototypical restaurants on a .6 -acre site on the south side of SW Upper Boones Ferry Road just west of the Durham Road entrance to 1 -5 (Figure 1). Now vacant, the site originally housed a gasoline station. Although an outright use in CG zone, a restaurant requires Type II site development review to insure compliance to all applicable development standards and on- and off -site improvement requirements. 1 The site has a strange configuration in which TL 1300 lies imbedded in TL 1200, so that the latter does not meet the City's minimum dimensional requirements. This can be easily remedied by asking the Washington County Assessor to consolidate the Tots into a sin- gle tax lot number. The applicant, which is only leasing the site, has asked the owner of the parcel to initiate this consolidation. 2 Reflects additional 12 feet of right -of -way required by the City of Tigard as of January 5, 1994. 1 . • • III. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT to the Current Conditions. A photograph of the site is presented in Figure 2; a current conditions plan is also being submitted as part of this application. The site slopes gently east/northeast, varying from an elevation of 212 to 224 feet (above sea level). Currently vacant, the site once accommodat- ed a gasoline station; the required envir remediation, evident in the photographs taken in February, has now been completed. The site is located in 'a general commercial zone; there is no residential development in the immedi- ate vicinity; surrounding uses are illustrated in Figure 3. The site is The bound on the east by an on- ramp to 1-5. Immediately to the south lies the Sherwood Inn, a motel and restaurant complex. motel's prominent, elevated sign, which is approximately 40 -45 feet high, is located immediately adjacent to the site's southern boundary. A Chevron gasoline station lies to the west, across the internal driveway to the motel. Campus office uses lie further to the west. The extensive PacificCorp Business Park lies to the north, across Boones Ferry. FIGURE 2 SITE :...:.. ............ w:y!:. a sY \.0 .. .. ...: �: ::::. �... � ... ....... :.......... . ....... ...::.:..:.....:: :::.::i ii: 'y�.� • .}ti 1 } `:c' iii' <'Yi: ��SiSi`�'t' :::.i. ':iii ::$'i:;•:.:; .: .......... .......... . :.'.. , :i:ii i;:' ;:: '' > tf$..., •• r.:it.i!: ii :`:. �:::... � 155::4.• >;;:; n •; ,. ....:..:. �: �`<.o::,'!: y }Si ?O.v 2::• :�: c�:;� i::: %'... ,!" 5,,.....:.,. -. <•:: �. ::..vp. ...o. � 99a:.:iC+.;:i;fv..; .. . < i i :::,!.,fit! >: � }:�. >:::�;:!::... ::::}�::•;: :i' <..} : :�::;: '';$j .2:<�S }: ::C "i'�i X55:.... �: }:' i5)4i:ii;:;j::v:: !• %�i :: :'.. ` iii% .:.v.... .:: .. .. .:• : :•:: ? .i: •: :i ¢: •: :• ?:.}v � v: ::.: };. }�: .... ..:. :... ,•:�:::::':�:5 :555.:• } :• : :::::.:......:. • \,}e} :.C• .w:5::..�. .5:: < < "'i�','i:� "a K>. � ... .. S�`q:. ��.`i @t- <'>4•' :�i:�CpCp' !t$���v.•� \;�' » `?;� :i>•w.4.: . ?3..• •((�()J:' �i .N .\ t:iV• � ' >.: .: `C . �����qyy��6 ^ \..... ,L•A � i(::i::, �``2�ZvW \ \ .7:• : ;c cc <;:: a�!av' ��tia. �: :.:.:: k\vw..;,::. ;,,! „r��:•;: ?:: h .. - .! 4!tn:e;i3.R <•¢: a;,a:3�.:_ • : �;;;;: : ' ..hry }:• :• : ; : } }:;; n: \.; v:. �;..:,Jt3: :.. •... : . .A. 'AC .i�i�' 'S;. \ } \ n .t:Y �iY'i: ? >::;:�::�i'i�. .r�• tit \ >y '\ �:.:2�iti..: a!!t. � � . � .::,..� s: \, .2 FA:;; >:::: :::!;�>. : "' ' Q:£ 55ti�: ; ;: ::i:o:.:.,:..::•.� }}::: ti.:!.a:::.�: �:. }}:•'::;;�i:::: +:<:: i'.;;;;.;;. }�. �: •: •, • J: tint: C:": C:::•X•}: L }:}'.t} } }:J '•\C' \: ; :•:?•: t. ... .... y.�........ ..... .. ............. .,•:::.:•:::: }.; •:::.::\ •.::�5:: <:.t�:: t:::.!.}.::• :w r t \`}:•`.`y;:: {! \: ^:�ti }}:5:':;i: % >: ;gi•:i�� \•;:Stiu;S; } }:; * }: �.:,� }`;!: }':;•:;•} C:•::::.. v:? �ii ��? i is� 'rt:- :i':' {:jii:y:::;ti: t }i \ \ ::: \.}.: :..}•..v}},.; \:.:v•v }.7• •. 4\ ::},: \n \}. .;t�t h.�tt .. i ti� :i�i:;�u�:1�:�:�;:; >. ?.�: �.. ..r C r:, ,v v }4 Rv`it�5:::::.,v ..v. \w ;;.� • • : }n \•: }: }::!4 \4:: •! tt:!w:.t•.v.�w •.: , : {.}: ti? ? <tv: ?:'i >�i: �. •. ....................... } •: � .,.•. ;T.:{!i,^.w: }:::•:: }:::::.ttv •. :•;;.; .: i }:i > }::• }:v .v.k.,v.; }�... t..::.v:: . :nt \ \t.......... t:�: v.w::::v:�>.t4.v } }. ' 'tiA.!'ly :.:. '•/.•::.v.v:v:: :i v 4::: :. t: } \ }?v}:• \t %'•:•:! : : :: : :.v: v+: \•»:•:::!:\..vv:.. . \..tt. n::::::.v: .... ......... .... . . ... . .:.. ::::: .. ....::::::::: . tiff .::::. �: ..........: • .. :.:i,. :: :• ...... .. `:::: .: <•} i �555 ; ^55�5 .,...fr.. \^Q. . .. . ..::. �n.:. �:.:v. {.:: }::.: vt:•:v!: ?!�: iii::::::: •: • %!v: < +• } :• }: +• }:4t.• }:'t0• }• ••:'• }.,vv .t w. v.v: » .:. \vw: v:.v: 5`8 <•: } \,,vv. \. }::: Tv. \::.w.t :.v,tw w.v: 5 } \• \: }:::: n•::.v:::..�: .... ?�i::i }1$!55'i'; . ... :..,, . v:::!.:. JY;;<;:;!.}} v. w. v:; :.vvv:vw:.w::.ty: \3 } }}:• } }:J:v: \•....... : ... k\�.. ... �.vw.::v::. p s,� Y�•°•�:??;•+8' .::::::.:.:•: } }.; ... :}y/%y'Y / JY.'�i : 2• tQ � • isf: i:: ::•5 >:::;::;:;R�fi:::;• :5:i's :: : < < .X.�ck;gkFa•;g.:::!'i:.'•: r::'.. }.!. ,v . �S7?G Q, •;.. YOtSQRY� `�", ..:.ct?n .... ,i:i : i ,�, 5'4,,..'4,.? !.} .. �!} <s eM k� ,t'.:"e,, ..,:,,...}. ..;?.c';`r ..COO.•?,..v,.. 4,. :n:v.:v::::nt,t„• }::!:• : �5:J::.} } :::::::::::. :�:: v }:: �:!v: v�::::: ... v::•::::::;; .... ..\ \... J:! �:!! Si: Li:>.• 55 :i:::5555:Y� :::: :::::::::: i�:::;• :�!:. : }i:!.:::!•v:::; ;jij::. '`;' 4' v�' '• i' i::;::;:.} :. } } ?!•:.!:i•:ti•:::: }y.v }:!•} ffi\' :5: \:ry ?:::} 5:;:;55555 ! • .,.,..,..,.,»,.,.., ... n,.�,,..t, n »».,, .t n,.. . ...... ....... .....v... ...,,. n.. n... m n... n... n.......... Proposed Development. The Holland, Inc. proposes to , , BurgerVille restaurant on the site. As noted in Figure 4, the build building a one - story is oriented 2 in a 570- square north /south foot access on the western itastern half of the parcel. A playground will be located half of on the the site; north the on -s end of e the parking building lot (towards occupies the Boones e Ferry) immdesi l adjacent to the dining room. As noted rectangle in Figure 5, the building will be of a prototypical gn ediate used by the company. The basic is enhanced with two porticos over the main entrance on the east side and drive -up windows on the west side respectively. The walls and facia are faced with a combination of broken -face concrete blocks and stucco in light grey and white and the mansard roof constructed of blue metal; the latter blocks view of the rooftop mechanical from the ground. 2 • • Figure 1 General Vicinity lirsy pea ef fine u4 Pp® Chevron Gas Station ., u1 L. m q Cif Parking Lot do � CC Best Western Motel • • Figure 3 Surrounding Uses >:• i., . • : ..: - . ' . q....4''°' : . : 7;. ' F�6'!➢ :: :*:::::::: : 222: :3 ' ::::i i'i , :v' e a e nli Th Sherwood Inn es e S o0 . • •-•-:•;..'..•:. > immediately to the south e' �. Y and a Chevron gas station an Ch o s s g aL � imm ediatel y to the west. w : ?.:: ::.:>::: : >: >:<: > <:: All s hare a common • „ ,� �.. >, fi ;� �. driveway to SW Upper , : i �§ �-. :. ; �, r t � :. ., „- Boones Ferry Roa . .:: >::i ::•:ti ?.. ::tt: ,�.,,� F,t.•> %r;:n4SkADo' t ?•> i ii i, i � t '� %`t'' f . � %> •..2:.23. 'iti w; +� a :� <; � `;''�L rrr... � <. %?:: � :r .. C::i:3.:i>., . '> • 1 -. � • .. ' >`;t2�i>. ti is r v\ A ; * . J J. �ro:•�,` n.• r ' • 't y,: 4.3I'.V �%' r✓ ` � /:%lv.�~r.•'.!5i��• ivi ..:"i >ti:A�' -iv,� is :4i:K:i: cYi ik' ::,: ' � '•.4 •: . :'if `. ^+ t::t° .a•. �, '? • ..mac c •,�� ` \. t; . � •• � y > . :. t,';,t :: c.. ti w �tti \ \ 2 2• , :. $ :i J .r ::c s.' • •: {C: z : r.: : 4 Y n :+4 i : � d ^�.43:'2:;:. j :::::2'::::£:$::3:::: ::3:::2 i' r 2: 3:::;:::: i:;::: 3::::':: 33:::: 3; y}::% �" '' �%; : ::::3::3::: : : � :;'!':: ... j`� i::t:. �:., �.: �. :: . : : : : >. ::::: >::::: i> . : ?•> i: :'>::t : :a:• »i: is } >:•i:iY :i:: >ii'ri o-`°3 : I<: �:' S:::: 3:$ 3; 3 ii:::: i: i: ::: :: i:: i::i::: ::: 2:;..:::3:22:::;;:2•i:�:;i::: :Y . :; �^ .iii:::ii:Y33:::::33::::::;3ii <£':;:i3i3: :3:;:3:2;::: .: r�3, ":•::.::-...::. � ..; . ::�:;. ?.::'.::.::.:'::: ice campus uses e .. further to the west. • .a . x ; •: : :;may 4. • ::;.'''';'''''''4""I.....;:,;.›.-1 , •: :;;:: �>,, • t` 2.`J'.2v y2y � 2 .a ; 'h. ..... .. 4rf �r 2 :��.tJw9y .R. 0� tSp �' " h:: The P Pacific ac c Co Business Corp s ss Park n ar es to the nor th Boones F • light across h t ss oo es e 1 TY g in u li industrial uses lie further y u to the north. : M � ; . '°"�""'V '^q t y „ w , ,l rf { ,kA}' ,+, v >h : &c a J. ��f 4 v F:4:? » ro,i .2 ^taoaa,`'yc�` g ��?�Y :g4 : u1°,,', v &` ' :a lYr �tl / >l�� th Vr / n'� Y% >ty:i4 :f •• 'i...§: ' '' u... i"rOO hs� .. :::::::Y�z , 2 :: ::: 1;%;v% . '��i`ri: ...x r !i? ?%:? s{);vg3 ?�:; :: • Figure 4 40 \• \ Site Fla . , i \ g: I \ 's z I \ y \ g , 11 t _ -- — Tr g @ a "a- 11 � _E — — : �" I € :4 g g • \ /. \��•IM •111 ° CI ■ ■■ 11111 09r ■ ■�∎M‘\,,. • , 3 \ 111 44 0, . Z a Ei a 1 •., „,. ,..._.• !,.. ). 1 1 \ io 00 li a ° 10 Oil g 01 \ \ ,; \ 3. 3 $ EN ir. 51 :i: ) ' 4 11 1 !, A. ,,,:410 . )i. S ,_ 1� o I: i l ° *1 1 1 11 , �i \ ` q . e a 0 00 0a w `` ;1_ , l 77 1)t - �a .- • \\ M e. -tl 7. w INTE RSTATE -5 J it � 11 Ti ./ I 2 g 1 ' .(j) a fl -i - : • ., rn 1 2 "sa eI� in • r ...,,, mi l • ELAN TRLE. VERIFY SCALE eEnstttas _ architects SITE OEVEIOMENT w a ”" a B U R G E V I I I ::_. F 41 (,,♦ RAN av ,� °� B Y associative a DATE • oE.nrlIT. '�' - - - -- S UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD •........ • -- 6 INTERSTATE 5 • t L.....,1 N 241i Mull D E L L NE E I s.c.s4 DP uutswawa, -----! TIGARD, OREGON vANcoJvt . wAsHINC104 Figure 5 Prototypical Burgerville USA Unit • ..„.........„. ....—...., . ....._..:.: - - ...... i.-- 7 .{. ;/- .,• I / ..... ..., e / / / / ( ,....... s, .- .. ,(,-., 1 -" .. s ...1 i ) \ '7 , c, " 1 1 i .",.../... .• V..NrY N. r1/4 r. ,..---.,../4` ,". •., C• — • .--, — \ t % ''',../-\ , 1:::•,/ ,.... Ac.... .(....,-12„, ...,-, • 1 f 'v., ‘..* ■/"A -te CeN .e., 4. 'eN • i %. ..• .if A ••• ,..."'" 1- ..----...........- e"--sve---\.. \ __ ...i. •Ai 1,51'..Vir. s,.-4' • ------_____. 1 A nn f ___,__ . / '...e.' \44 ,f? • -••• • t )(: pr i : z. 4 . .. . .... ..„.." . . /.. : — or - / • 1 ... • ,......,,, 7 7 il • „ii 4 - k• 1 ". - 1 . ''' , ....- 4/ i . : 1 4 ■ '‘‘\; • • .....---,.... • 1 LIU •• i ''' 7 . s , . • —7-7— SURCERV . '' ; ILLW• ; '• • •-.7".1, • • - . . - '" :t '.-.;; :... ‘:- r 94r4g31480411111111•14!"'"m4."W"" ...ta ": --4 '-:.•': i;t"ir I r t PAI- ie 4 ,. / . in" • 1 ' • i - " "" 1 N 1 "" -- . ,-...-- . •,..es. ....; : .... .,.. ...1, ir,.... j. .,,,,, .,. I I .. s • fil ev( 1, ( .."2„,,, , • : , .. 1 = $ i ' I \ : • ---, .01, ii"::::.• AMA 5, .. , /. ": - . f . i 1 , 1 Y,. MISIIIMIt die CP agi . MP - ..i • . .....* :- - — ....- q piP il ;H. _ ... .----: - 1 . .- - ....! . . f , p - ■ • ild 11.2 - ..,.,...:.______4,,,..........., . ot..., .... - : 1- . . wiersigratimm -ki l - ili ftV0 -------- --- - • - *-1 ,ffiligl i : A ' 1111.1. • Wie .1e41.r. V • )1 8 • • • . ' Z. , ar,,r. 4: ,•■•"" . .." • • . . i i ; II • : .. i i..-...a...._ ., ...... . ::., . . , . , ..a. • -. • •-• 1 , i :i ,. .4. •■ g i . , - ..... '--*-11:11111.1111 .." etV:41.4„:4 - • ••• A ' :' i • I ' . 11 fit q - f pi an . . • • .. , :.. .. . s Isi :, . ,_ . .../ , .113- ? • - • • elholi * -o, . • . 2. _ ..., . , .c. • ,, .. 4 ,,i rrif i [ ; -__, 1 „,, .....- ,„,„ . .... , ____ „...,,___, __...,.._. ,___.._....__ _.. .........„... ......- - • — . • _ > V• f's -- 4 .,. • .... .. 'I:1. P , ,....:. _ - — --..--..'------=:..... ‘ —. ________:.—..* .. • • %*•• . . . „ 7,4.1"*" 4 • ..•1 '. . . ==b, ..... • Ib Jr? • " V . . 4 . • .'• "••• '7. .- - — ...-:- -..... .. ......... . . -"•^••••••••..... • . - '.• i • .4 • e , tiN-,-- • ire ,,./ . •• • t ....•..........,...........a......, -,..-•• ...„. .. .,_,,..:___ _ _.......z ,..v .......... 51%, . :.., • e. I I; l '', ......“,■■•••....... ■••:,....... , .......„..,,,,, .......■■..... 1 BURGERV1LLEII LA. • • The on -site circulation is typical of a fast -food restaurant. The only access to the site will be via a two -way, 24 -foot wide driveway on the southwest corner of the site which opens onto the shared internal driveway. Customers who come into the facility to eat will be accommodated in the parking lot to the east of the main entrance; 22 parking spaces, including one disabled - accessible space, are provided here for customers and employees. This slightly exceeds the code requirement of 21 spaces. With access provided through the parking lot, a drive - through lane with queuing capacity for ten cars sweeps around the north side and along the west side of the facility past the two service windows. In the ideal BurgerVille design, vehicular traffic to the parking lot (sit -down patrons) and drive - through lane are separated to reduce conflicts and smooth the internal flow of traffic, but this is only possible when there are two driveways on the site. When there is only one access, a circular route through the site for drive - through traffic is the only option. Because of a shortage of space on the site, no "grill" spaces, for customers who must wait to have their orders filled, will be provided; how- ever, based on actual experience at existing BurgerVille outlets, these are only needed about 5% of the time. It is estimated that 60% of all business will use the drive - through facility. As noted in Figure 4, new sidewalks will be constructed on the Boones Ferry and the internal road- way; The Sherwood Inn was required to build the latter sidewalk as a condition of approval of its 1989 expansion (SDR 89 -23, V 89 -40). As the motel has posted a performance bond with the City of Tigard, The Holland, Inc. assumes that it will not be responsible for this improvement. The appli- cant is responsible for a half- street improvement on Boones Ferry, however. As there will be no off - site improvements undertaken to increase the roadway capacity, the applicant will have no offset for its $9,500 TIF fee. Pedestrian paths to the main entrance from the sidewalks on both Boones Ferry and the internal roadway will be provided, as illustrated in Figure 4. In both cases, this involves the crossing of the drive - through lane; however, again based on existing experience, this poses Tess hazard to pedestri- ans than directing them across a busy parking lot, as the cars in the drive - through lane are proceed- ing slowly in a forward direction. The proposed walkways also shorten the distance -of- travel for pedestrians. Accommodating pedestrians is particularly important at this site as it is anticipated that a large number of employees from surrounding offices will walk to BurgerVille for lunch. A bicycle rack accommodating four bicycles will be installed under canopy at the main entrance; at least two bicycle spaces are required by code. Upper Boones Ferry is served by Tri -Met's #37, but service is poor, with two -hour headways during non -peak hours and no service evenings and weekends. There is no transit stop adjacent to the site. It is anticipated that few if any BurgerVille patrons will arrive directly by transit. BurgerVille has been refining the proposed site design in the past 18 months to comply with the spir- it of the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR); starting May 9, 1994, all local jurisdictions will be required to review new developments' site orientation and pedestrian /bicycle /transit facilities to determine compliance with TPR. Placing the building nearer the street and using landscaping sen- sitively to buffer the impact of vehicles in the drive - through lane creates a more pedestrian - friendly atmosphere and, as noted above, reduces walking distances to the main entrance. At the same time, this configuration permits the separation of drive - through and sit -down traffic, thereby reducing on -site congestion. In evaluating the BurgerVille "case study" using the above site orientation 3 • • model, the Metro Site Orientation Working Group concluded that: "Autos and pedestrians need not be mutually exclusive; the issue is how to improve pedestrian connections, not preclude auto- orient- ed uses " The trash receptacle lies in the southeast corner of the site and will be screened. All deliveries and garbage pick -ups will be scheduled in the morning before the restaurant opens at 10 AM. Thus, there will be no conflict between these and customer activities. The restaurant, which will be open seven days a week, will close daily at 11 PM. As illustrated in the concept landscape plan in Figure 6 the site is generously landscaped, with 6,605 square feet (27 %) devoted to plantings. This includes a generous front -yard setback (at least 10 feet in depth), which will be planted in grass, shrubs and street trees, to create an attractive buffer between the building and street. Originally, City staff requested that a low wall be constructed along the frontage, but when the site plan was developed in its final form, a significantly wider -than- anticipated front yard planting strip resulted, some of which lies in the public right -of -ways. This landscaping will also mask/minimize the visual intrusion of the drive - through lane from Boones Ferry, per City staff's recommendation in the pre - application conference6. The following table summarizes the use of space on the site as follows: Land Use Area Percentage Building 2,703 11% Paving/Walkways 14,836 61% Trash Enclosure 200 1% Landscaping 6,605 27% TOTAL 24,344 100% IV. DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE Site Development Requirements. The proposed development conforms to all site development requirements of the CG zone including: There is no minimum lot size or front, side, rear or corner setbacks in a CG zone. 3 Transportation Planning Rule Implementation Guidelines: Report on a Regional Discussion (Report of the Metro Site Orientation Working Group), February 1994, page A -16. 4 18 full -size drawings of the detailed landscape plan are being submitted with this application, per City requirements. 5 The City requires through a provision in its zoning code that the property owner is responsible for maintaining landscaping in the public right -of -way, a provision with which Holland, Inc. will comply. 6 For some reason, ODOT has wrapped its chain link fence, which separates the site from the freeway entrance to the east, around the corner and partially down Boones Ferry. Since most of this fence lies in the public right -of -way, the applicant must negotiate with ODOT with regard to its removal. 4 . • • Figure 6 Concept Landscape Plan 44t1I) . . : 4 1 ,11C • ' 'Mt I & A FPIP 4% %..,,, . .:11 40 4*N‘ .° - - - - •11':!,1!. • A 0 _ • ietA. rlip■ rt.* . i i 0% ‘,11...:_ r ... AVP 1.142,0 ,..,--.. .474•44. di e ( if is f lei Of ,, I ► 1 `p 1 I A.44 _. ..: R . . • ' 1, a , D,' ( E !1 R isle - V, ■1/: b; -141 �: O ; ❑ -, . 1.17*.:- - -, ::i #10 1 t�' 1 • :` r .i1Q:\. �/�111��!' r,, °� .4 k 4 1,,,,, � pa. o a - __...i.e.ra v , b' _.., 011.4. tP — ° Ny «ur�K� MIMING i � - :, . ammow 1,,,Ntsiv • ,II IN !me / / item:dim,' iUNnd imismi :a. ■ N T...“.... S. k. P.. LANDSCAPE PLAN • 1 i 1F,".'.0 e. Scale: 1" = 30' NORTH , ��0... ,, �,,,.,, • • • The minimum street frontage is 25 feet and the minimum lot width is 50 feet; the site is an average of 180 feet long by 129 feet wide, exceeding these minimum requirements. The dimensions of the site also create a smaller ratio than the maximum depth -to -width ratio of 2.5:1. • Maximum site coverage is 85% with a minimum of 15% of site area devoted to landscaping or natural vegetation. Landscaping accounts for 27% of the site, far in excess of this require- ment; the maximum lot coverage is correspondingly less than the maximum allowed. • Maximum building height is 45 feet; the proposed building does not exceed 20 feet. Parking and Access. The proposed development complies with all parking /access requirements including: • A fast food restaurant required one space/50 gross square feet (gsf) of dining area plus one space /two employees. The dining room contains 780 gsf, generating the need for 16 spaces. There will be no more than 10 employees in any given shift, requiring five more spaces for a total of 21 spaces. The site contains 22 spaces, which slightly exceeds the code require- ment. No grill spaces are being provided at this site because of space constraints. No more than 25% of these can be substandard. On this site, only two spaces, or less than 10 %, are compacts. • For 25 or fewer spaces, one disabled - accessible parking spaces is required; as noted on the site plan, this have been provided immediately adjacent to the main entrance, using the mini- mum dimensions required by the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as amended by the State of Oregon. • Commercial developments with more than 15 parking spaces must provide bicycle parking at the rate of one space /15 automobile spaces. Using this standard, two parking spaces are required; the applicant will provide a rack accommodating four bicycles. • All driveways and parking areas must be paved; the development meets this requirement. • The queuing line for the drive -up windows contains space for ten vehicles, which is the num- ber required by the zoning code. • Minimum and maximum two -way driveway access widths are 24 and 40 feet, respectively. The proposed will be 24 feet, which complies with this code requirement . • Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking area, outdoor common areas and public sidewalks and streets. As noted on the site plan, pedestrian access is provided to the main entrance from both Boones Ferry Road and the shared inter- nal driveway. This requirement has been satisfied. • A minimum of one tree /per seven parking spaces is required "to provide a vegetative canopy effect ". There are 25 spaces, thus, requiring four trees in and around the parking lot; nine trees have been provided, significantly exceeding the minimum requirement. Landscaped 5 • • parking areas also "shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view ". This is accomplished through the generous provision of trees and shrubs in the eastern planting strip, which separates the site from the 1 -5 entrance to the east, and through the large landscaped area to the northeast, which shields the parking lot from Upper Boones Ferry Road. • A 30 -foot triangular vision clearance area is required on both sides of the driveway onto the internal roadway; as noted in the landscape plan, this has been provided. Buffering and Screening. Special requirements apply for buffering and screening as follows: • The proposed use is not located near any sensitive uses. For this reason there are no spe- cial buffering requirements along the property's perimeters. • Site - obscuring screening is required around trash receptacles and recycling facilities. The trash receptacle on the site will be appropriately screened. Although not specifically required by code, the mansard roof will screen rooftop mechanical equipment from view as well. Street Trees. Three street trees are provided on the Upper Boones Ferry Road frontage. There are none located on the eastern portion of the site so the company's sign will not be obscured and to provide adequate vision clearance for the freeway entrance. As noted in the landscape concept plan, the front yard setback is generously landscaped including street trees, shrubs and grass. Signs. According to the zoning code, the site is permitted to have one freestanding sign, which can- not exceed 70 sf per face or maximum height of 20 feet. The BurgerVille site will feature a two - sided, back -lit monument sign, each face of which will be 70 square feet or less. In addition, a wall signs no greater than 15% of the wall face area is permitted. There will be a back -lit BurgerVille logo signs on the west and east porticos, each of which will be approximately 17 sf in size. The standard BurgerVille USA logo will be placed on the edge of the roof at two locations, on the north and south sides of the building; these will also not exceed 18 sf. TPR Compliance, BurgerVille has developed a general site plan which facilitates safe pedestrian and transit access while facilitating on -site circulation. This includes orientation of the building to the street, with two pedestrian crossings through the drive - through lane, one from the internal driveway and the other from Upper Boones Ferry Road. The parking lot is located away from the street. After refining it for the last 18 months, BurgerVille believes that this is the optimum site configuration to accommodate this auto - oriented use to the spirit of TPR. • 6 • i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) • i, iige K 0 he,4vt' S , being duly sworn, depose and say that on 7e 4 AN took oZ,. 19 9y , I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at /5 S 41 y/opeA' g e5 a copy of which so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at go) I/ Pe d . 04H. , with postage prepaid thereon. • S', nature Subscribed and sworn to before me this o� day of Q , 19 q4- . 0 4,,,,JkK.. Notary Public , My Commission Expires: 51 • h: \Iogin\jo \affmail.cit TH• • Holland, INC. THE HOLLAND CORPORATE OFFICES (206) 694 -1521 AND BURGERVILLE U.S.A. 109 WEST SEVENTEENTH STREET RESTAURANTS VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON 98660 February 17, 1994 «NAME» • «ADDRES S» «CITY» Dear «TO »: The Holland, Inc. plans to construct a new BurgerVille U.S.A. Restaurant at 15650 Upper Boones Ferry Road adjacent to I -5 in the near future. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss this proposal in more detail with you and other nearby property owners and CIT representatives. You are invited to attend a meeting on Thursday evening, March 3, 1994 at 7:30 PM in the Town Hall Conference Room, City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard. This meeting is part of the City's new Citizen Involvement Team (CIT) process. At this informational meeting, we will present our preliminary plans and architectural renderings of the project; these may be modified prior to formal submission to the City. We are pleased to have this opportunity to respond to your questions and concerns. If you are unable to attend and need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at 283 -6052; this is a special Portland telephone line and does not require a long- distance call. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, Jack Graves, Manager Site Development • • To whom it may concern: The following is a list of persons to be notified within a 250 foot radius of our proposed Burgerville site at 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. Also included are those members of the East C.I.T. which are to be notified as well. C.I.T. Members: Mary Swintek 9915 SW Frewing #23 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Hopkins 7430 SW Vams Tigard, OR 97223 Mark F. Mahon 11310 SW 91st Court Tigard, OR 97223 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard, OR 97223 Property Owners: Tax Lot #s 0700 Pacific Realty Associates 1400 15115 SW Sequoia Parkway #200 -WM 1500 Tigard, OR 97224 0800 Chevron USA, Inc. P.O. Box 7611 San Francisco, CA 94120 0800 Fred Drysdale Chevron Inc. 15670 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. Tigard, OR 97224 • • 0900 H.E. Ferryman 9110 NE Highway 99 Vancouver, WA 98665 1000 Portland Orthopedic Clinic 3025 N. Vancouver Ave. Portland, OR 97227 1000 M. Collier & Associates P.O. Box 779 Longview, WA 98632 Joanne C. Ryan and Bob & Pamela Smith 11440 SW Lynnvale Dr. Portland, OR 97225 \-, • 0 • -- Name of applicant /. - t o . ' d I - S d i Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # Z S 1 1 2 b p Lot /300 4- / 210 Address or General Location /.SL 70 6 w Wppep RooNe.S re ARYp &• Ti614Rb RECEIVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE FEB 2 1994 I. r 4 e k )() 4 veS, do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 3U/90e/el/ilk' 1L°S�r91l69AI affecting the land located at /5670 SW G1pve. . 73ouleI &Mit Nand did on the 2 .. day of ?L° lo/e t/,4f Y ° , 19 ?V personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed fora 75�,/j /d /hq ��•/p/•j�J�' I-s,�% 4es j i application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. v sign was . The si g posted at �,(� �.57 ' �a C /N6 Cc,C.lObtJe Fence (state location on property) This eja eg day of a hAtit/,y pf- , 19 9'y . ' ., _ " .O nature Subscribed and swom to, affirmed, before me this a a e day of , 1 g l4 ahAA-RitiA , 0, . Notary Public for the State of Or My Commission Expires: x/ 77 ' WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ioginljo\posD cit • • M ee t ing The Holland, Inc. (parent company of Burgerville U.S.A.) plans to construct a new Burgerville U.S.A. restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, March 3 Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 7:30 PM Please note, this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be modified prior to the submittal of the application to the City. • • -- Name of applicant The z% (9 //a pd J, . 3 eu» ' J i/s ,o, Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # A5 1 12-DD L O/ /3 00 t / ZOO Address or General Location /." 6 70 3 to i./ p e p ROONeS Fe t Y T fR AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE I C K Gie 4 ye S, do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed Cf,'6 e,et/ / //e "?es141,, phy r affecting the land located at /56 5k) G1ype.g. 7,co,t'eS Feitit Nand did on the A2.. day of 7 hie u Y , 19 9y personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a 3 ild / h q 4 d-� L e SyQh application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at Weer Fa C /N6 C &Ne Fr f ,d e (state location on property) This 41 /2Z___ 15 / day of "Fe, b, d//9/ o , 19 9' 9 4ele ure Subscribed and swom to, affirmed, before me this o( h� day of 19 I`f b -K Notary Public for the State of Ore /7 x My Commission Expires: If/ `f WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 109intiplposmicit • • Meeting The Holland, Inc. (parent company of Burgerville U.S.A.) plans to construct a new Burgerville U.S.A. restaurant at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a meeting on: Thursday, March 3 1994 Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 7:30 PM Please note, this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be modified prior to the submittal of the application to the City. • • Citizens Involvement Team Meeting March 3, 1994 7:30 PM at Tigard City Hall Conference Room To discuss preliminary plans for a Burgerville U.S.A. restaurant at 15650 Upper Boones Ferry Road, Tigard. ATTENDING NAME ADDRESS PHONE # 9 fLeaddkam s &____ X09 w. /7 ge..te., 6 9y.. J J (1 / -1019 THE• • Holland, INC. THE HOLLAND CORPORATE OFFICES (206) 694 -1521 AND BURGERVILLE U.S.A. 109 WEST SEVENTEENTH STREET RESTAURANTS VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON 98660 May 5, 1994 Bob L. & Pamela Smith & Joanne Ryan 11440 SW Lynnvale Drive Portland, OR 97225 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Smith & Ms. Ryan: Enclosed please find a copy of a consolidation request directed to the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation. During the plan review application process, we have been requested by the City of Tigard to consolidate tax lots #1200 and #1300 as a condition of approval for our new Burgerville U.S.A. restaurant at the site of 15670 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd. in Tigard, Oregon. These two tax lots compose the site and because of the unique configuration of one tax lot within the other, the City would like to see it consolidated into one. Your immediate attention to this matter will be appreciated. Sincerely, J ack C. Graves PDM The Holland, Inc./Burgerville U.S.A AIN • • WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DEPT. OF ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION SUITE 130 (503)648 -8741 DATE WASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT & TAXATION MAIL STOP #9 155 N. 1st AVENUE • HILLSBORO, OR 97124 RE: CONSOLIDATION REQUEST Gentlemen: Please consolidate as many of the following accounts as possible. Map •Tax Lot If you have any questions regarding this consolidation, please do not hesitate to contact us. Telephone Address • Signature of Owner Date SEE OTHER SIDE FOR CONDITIONS If an L.I.D. (Special Assessment) exists; Consolidation approved Land Use & Transportation Signature Date Unified Sewerage Agency Signature Date Department of Assessment and Taxation 155 North First Avenue, Suite 130 Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 -3087 Phone: 503/648 -8741 III • _ Please be advised that the consolidation can not be done if one of the following exists. Taxes are not paid on all of the accounts (ORS 308.210(4)). There is a mortgage on a portion of the property only. The owner's names are not the same on aLl the parcels. The property is divided by one or more taxing districts. The property will not all fit on one map. The property is not contiguous to one another., Dwellings on two or more of the parcels. If an L.I.D (Special Assessment) exists Land Use and Transportation and /or Unified Sewerage Agency approval will be required before the consolidation can be made. •v • • CITY OF TIGARD PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES / NON- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE: 2/ 3 y L / STAFF: b e APPLICANT: 7 Ai ! la 1-rGt 1 4 C . AGENT: I eJ Phone: (206) g y'/- /5 Phone: s Z - �� u •7 14 • d E' 7y 7S PROPERTY LOCATION: Address: 1 SGSCT S ) (,( j/ ry Tax Map & Tax Lot: 2 / /2 i .A • /2CV NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): i " Y✓t e t. a t� )i ( ( ) a (.7 r" d L i •• F t 4e �7 / - C. " / Cr) / / / '-/ PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: 13.4; /J r �� 2; .n c; , / /2 G' c7 4,-1 / - - / 1 f.S Lrav'e 0 5 �E ✓ u \ GC�t cc ) ' - vice r ° COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: (^ -' c: / ✓1 ¢ v C L-1,1 1,2-7 F�•�'• �Q ZONING DESIGNATION: G E. e ve / � vr-r vr-r e:�C / CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM �� CHAIRPERSON: - 5 - c.(-31 PHONE: '2_ ?3 - /25 '/ ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS f cl �'e C Lta fi`cr I � S, fOO ate, Minimum lot size: � sq. ft.�� � /6';'/492-7 S G7 f I LS re Uf' S ch.•ee/ La -l r c'. t . ��cvar M l ot wi dth: SC c � ., � \ � - � Setbacks: front 1�" �ft. s ft. rear C ft. garage /1 ft. corner ft. from street. Maximum site coverage. g_S % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: 1 S % Maximum building height: L/ S ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS / / Streets: LJ5 ft. centerline of 4( j �ef �'co. Fs' }'�:.2f K3 Established areas: l /A ft. from Ai �.r Lower intensity zones: '/1/1 ft., along the site's '• /'? boundary / BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020): Buildings located in a non - residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A maximum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone district. Page 1 • • • CITY OF TIGARD • PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON- RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE: 2 3 STAFF: e !Q ___ Lvl L ) e cc APPLICANT: I 1 � c* _ .air 1 �C . AGENT: Phone: (266) 6 /5"2 / Phone: 2- u 7 PROPERTY LOCATION: " - `:` ` %✓` j e Address: 15 (._) (i( s F7 r �E� `>�'_:r�re. • -may Tax Map & Tax Lot: ? • i / 2.. D! J c NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): Si � H' � L I G,1i � (/v( r. i V "- \ i• � �.' ��� is •t i' .. ; L.: ✓tQ I u <, /.uF -r ; 'f' °.��� 4 l7l167Y c■if PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: /� r ! � � � c � c•: �, , .//e ( 3 �. cZ ✓1 / - I 1 6 75 JC L(a,re. �O f , (- ) ! c t (, c : u O k v CJ `�C' ✓✓ /CC ='�dY'�G'✓r I / • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: (/ e1-1 E' C / ZONING DESIGNATION: e 4-7 ✓sr / � G' �7 v r �':�C 1w CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAM S;fr CHAIRPERSON: PHONE: •"2_q1' 02.5'/ ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS _ cf c. c' _ i ;fzc ✓ - l S (Cc) a / CI Minimum lot size: �� sq. ft~ - •� - � �� / ��cf �Y /.I c: . `- M- tm lot width: — 7 - 5C1 F S4f� / `tic Sc 1 . Setbacks: front •7 side ; ft. rear C ft. ' t garage ii /,; ft. corner }(- ft. from street. Maximum site coverage. ,3S % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: / 8 Maximum building height: /-/ ' ft. ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. Maximum lot depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1. SPECIAL SETBACKS Streets: L/ 5 • ft. rom centerline of 4/ 66170 Established areas: /7/a ft. from << / -; . Lower intensity zones: 'h% /' ft., along the site's �a /6 boundary i BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions (Code Section 18.98.020): Buildings located in a non - residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 1. A maximum FAR (building floor area to site area ratio) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 2. All actual building setbacks will be at least 1/2 the building's height; and 3. The structure will not abut a residential zone district. Page 1 • • • • / jp acc-e ficz. C � S O ..c 0 a.'CJ PARKING AND ACCESS / } Required parking for this type of use: f` -•'� c- f c / "' Ir c'cu ✓'. ct - -C'- c � l as I s c -` F. - '. c: 2 (2 1.4.-1. p l ye , • Secondary use re parking: - - 1/ ; -./a a l f / No more than 25% of required spaces may be designated and /or dimensioned as compact spaces. Park stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: _Stand parking space dimensions: 9 ft. S IS c- Compact parking space dimensions: 8.5 ft. X 15 ft. Disabled parking: All parking areas shall provide app=op=iately located i and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act 1 I (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking symbol • I shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign { shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for civic, non - residential, commercial and industrial developments which provide 15 or more parking spaces. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the, basis of one space for every 15 vehicular parking spaces. All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage areas, must,' be paved. J Drive -in use queuing areas: ( r r „- - ra -- • Iit Minimum number of accesses: ( f / v P Minimum access width: 24 feet / Maximum access width: 40 feet Pedestrian access must be provided between building entrances and parking areas, outdoor common areas, and public sidewalks and streets. A minimum of one -tree -tor -- eiiefy seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses, see Development Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108. CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road /driveway, road/railroad, and road /road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street' functional classification. \ c ` ) - / • vow'`./ Page 2 ‘ lE'12✓ i ' n L o ■ III • BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in Code Chapter 18.100. The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area: �/Q ft. along north boundary / ft. along east boundary P7 ft. along south boundary i-i q ft. along west boundary In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along / / ' STREET TREES Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in / length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private property within six feet of the right - of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 \ feet apart depending on the branching width of the tree at maturity. i` - Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained % from the Planning Division. SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively, a Sign code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. J SENSITIVE LANDS Code Chapter 18.84 provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100 -year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the pre - application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Page 3 III • Chapter 18.84 also pro a regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lan areas. In most cases, dedication of 100 - year floodplain areas to the C for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the app o a development application. `1=! QS l'747 /et, ( ?.c — - /c ' e:• .?Lt l• 4- /Gr j G•L( < ,: f...-7 1..--ti c' ,.,4's % <(vc. ad. - �t dir ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS G . S' J� d i Sc' ,.t.5"5 `1 ,( S ` 6= t'2 4.J /c: �.. n.. a, c: z, me. c i ba - .r 1 1 1 �� CF. ,sT�) /N.c4(ec,i (—e,/ e CcvrSisYF',. L. c....; - I 7 Lle� L �t, i.:C. i ° C7 fri GC) 4t t c 1 1 a di a / 1.1 -r A 1' S x' /74' ° 10-E•. C ' Re cC , .i6 I Cr L<.v� -. . 14 (.e e ir'''e - ` 4.. 4' /SIL - 1 - ,f) sae C • S )(mi PROCEDURE ' { .-� L� � /20,2 I 'a .5 f'"�✓✓ ' \C .4, . s S U. P S C'1 • / 4, y 1 / Y t c .'' xFs / Q ,i , . u � i i�tS•a Fa �� 1 Adinistrative st�ari review. .) J t'J" / Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member at the Community Development Department counter at City Hall. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will preform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 10 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify an applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are needed. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take . additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10 day public appeal period follows all 15.nd use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the 1%"' /,,, ,.•t L. z 1 l- �.� .si s� A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. 9 4 5 j )45.6 , - 0 T 1/146.7.-,, L•7 ir7c%6 S L( k'�G��77` � c ✓ L'F ''"C` u L'c' `' f ' -/ ! ..,(. ( i v'fkc?.,— �SSE�<c..- C-L-lq S (/G�(L • Y G? JCE'.':? (c-tr5� • •`� Page 4 p et vc..E„ I cc': c c , ciY- - - • 2_7-,) E__—:<,,.511,,,c, 19,,(2. • • This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Another pre - application conference is required if an application is to be submitted more than six months after this pre - application conference, unless the second conference is deemed unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: ��- L! " . PLANNING DIVISION 6) _ + ' n �; _ PHONE: 639 -4171, • ! .0 , .:C. C r 'Jr r 1.: 'ir. T:c vjcla•( 1/1L1 o-•'� �.<:�1( Page 5 • • PUBLIC FACILITIES The purpose of the pre - application conference is to: (1) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions; (2) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns; and (3) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right -of -way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: 1) to increase abutting public rights -of -way to the ultimate functional street classification right -of -way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or 2) for the creation of new streets. /V / 0X/ 77'-J r � :9 C.1 1/P u 60 OLE�r - - Approval of a development application for this site wi 1 require � g -of- way dedication for: 1. to feet from centerline. 2. to feet from centerline. 3. to feet from centerline. Street improvements: .Jo,,c) �7 . 1. / ?� street improvements will be necessary along �►,�� ORP45 2. ,'cur 2. street improvements will be necessary along 3. Street improvements shall include - feet of pavement from ' centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five -foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the street improvements may be . deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non - remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: 1. 2. Page 6 . • Pedestrianways /bikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) e ' "inch line which is located in UiDi Z.. . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed _ development site's )< /bMft) 7r C/ G ✓ Water Supply: The Tigard-Water District (Phone: 639 - 1554) oz-the-Tualatin Valley water -i ct (Phone: 642 - 1511) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, 645 - 8533) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. �� r ,/�� ,yam Other Agency Permits: � % K 4 kth9e "�l� - Storm sewer improvements: �X % . V . S S IN U. z rRo i,- - /7 r / /i'- 1 ,- 7 • -I - / - STORMWATER QUALITY FEES t9cl / 4 er-fec-75 ,v ayt w ' " " 6 m /GI� ix Sy The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed to enforce, Resolution No. 90 -43 Surface Water Management Regulations which requires the construction of on -site water quality facilities. At the discretion of the City, the applicant maybe offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construction of such a facility. The resolution requires the construction of a water quality facility and /or the payment of a fee. The fee shall be based upon the amount of impervious surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall be $285.00. The City of Tigard shall determine if a fee may be paid or a facility shall be constructed. MY TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county -wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred • until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permis ible only when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. 9 r .sdj PA/ Page 7 • III • STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right -of -way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street operiing permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lot. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. ■ PREPARED BY L. ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: 639 -4171 • RP:preapnon Page 8 • • • III , Staff Gvi e � Date > /-� ,' GP/ • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST The items on the checklist below are required for the successful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be brought and submitted with all other materials at the time you submit your application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call Planning at 639 -4171. ITEMS TO BE BASIC MATERIALS INCLUDED: A) Application form (1 copy) [ 4 k' 8) Owner's signature /written authorization [ c]-- C) Title transfer instrument [4 - -- D) Assessor's map [l E) Plot or site plan [LJ — F) Applicant's statement [ �---- ( _ [ ] (H) Filing fee ($ ) . eel' [ SPECIFIC MATERIALS A) Site Information showing (No. of copies / ): [ 1) Vicinity Map _ ( 4 3- ----- 2) Site size & dimensions [- 3) Contour lines (2 ft at 0-10% or 5 ft for grades > 10 %) ( 4) Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds [ y] 5) Locations of natural hazard areas including: / a) Floodplain areas [ b) Slopes in excess 25% / [— c) Unstable ground See ( acs I-. ,',dv<ic..7 [iz]--- d) Areas with high seasonal water table [t-]' e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential [ 1 f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils [4 ------- 6) Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: . a) Wildlife habitats [ ] b) Wetlands [ 1 7) Other site features: a) Rock outcroppings .r [L]- b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level • [_ • 8) Location of existing structures and their uses [ ]- 9) Location and type of on and off -site noise sources [ ter - 10) Location of existing utilities and easements [ ---- 11) Location of existing dedicated right -of -ways [ LJ -- ----- • B) Site Development Plan showing (No. of copies 1`?S): E 1) The proposed site and surrounding properties [4-]m_ 2) Contour line intervals - [9' 3) The location, dimensions and names of all: a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining [ properties APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Pag 411° . • • b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site. [ g ----- c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension 4) The location and dimension of: ,�_ a) Entrances and exits on the site [ b) Parking and circulation areas [ &]„- c) Loading and services areas d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation [ e) Outdoor common areas, [ 4 f) Above ground utilities [ J 5) The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site [ r-- b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site [ L� 6) Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 7) Sanitary sewer facilities [ �3� 8) The location of areas to be landscaped [G}� 9) The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques [�]� 10) The location of mailboxes 11) The location of all structures and their orientation E....]/" 12) Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements {t3 C) Grading Plan (No. of copies / ( 5 '5 - ) [ The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1) The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating general contour lines, slope ratios and soil stabilization proposals, and time of year it is proposed to be done. 2) A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report C 4- 1 ---- b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated [yam D) Architectural Drawings (No. of copies /a ):- The site development plan proposal shall include: 1) . Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on -site; and [L-]' -- 2) Typical elevation drawings of each structure. [ ��-- E) Landscape Plan (No. of copies ,<'S ): [ The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1) Description of the irrigation system where applicable [ �- 2) Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings [--- APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 2 III - • 3) Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas and common open spaces [ 1 4) Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials. The landscape plan shall include a narrative which addresses: 1) Soil conditions. [t]� 2) Erosion control measures that will be used. [ d� F). Sign Drawings Sign drawings shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct the sign. [(]� G) Traffic generation estimate H) Preliminary partition or lot line adjustment map showing (No. of Copies ): 1) The owner of the subject parcel [� 2) The owner's authorized agent 3) The map scale, (20,50,100 or 200 feet =1), inch north arrow and date 4) Description of parcel location and boundaries [ a� 5) Location, width and names of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel [t]/ 6) Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 7) Location and width of all water courses [ 8) Location of any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level [� 9) All slopes greater than 25% [ 3— . 10) Location of existing utilities and utility easements [- 11) For major land partition which creates a public street: a) The proposed right - of-way location and width [i]---- _ b) A scaled cross - section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip [� 12) Any applicable deed restrictions 13) Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable [t]-- I) Subdivision Preliminary . Plat Map and data showinq(No. of Copies ): 1) Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per sheet [ ] 2) The proposed name of the subdivision [ ] 3) Vicinity map showing property's relationship to • arterial and collector streets - [ ] 4) Names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner developer, engineer, surveyer, designer, as applicable[ ] 5) Date of application [ ] 6) Boundary lines of .tract to be subdivided [ ] 7) Names of adjacent subdivision or naives of recorded . owners of adjoining parcels of unsubdivided land [ ] 8) Contour lines related to a City - established bench- mark at 2 -foot intervals for 0-10% grades greater than l0% [ ] APPLICATION CHECKLIST - Page 3 • • 2S112DD -00800 2S112DD -00900 RYAN, JOANNE C FERRYMAN, H E SMITH, BOB PAMELA 9110 NE HWY 99 BY CHEVRON USA INC /PROP TAX VANCOUVER WA 98665 PO BOX 7611 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94120 25112DD -01000 2S112DD -00700 FERRYMAN, H E PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES 9110 NE HWY 99 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200 -WMI VANCOUVER WA 98665 PORTLAND OR 97224 2S112DD -01400 2S112DD -01500 PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES L P 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200 -WMI 15115 SW SEQUOIA PKWY #200 -WMI PORTLAND OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97224 • • 4-1A G�P REOUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: DATE: May 17, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0011 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE LOCATION: 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restaurant. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 27, 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: Name of Person Commenting: Phone Number: • • N:- rFICATICN LIST FOR ALL AP ?LICATIONS 1. CIT (2) copies _ CPC NO. 2. CITY DEPARTMENTS f Building Official/Dave S. ?arks & Recreation Board Police City Recorder -Fie:d Operations P gineering /Micael A. ' Permits Facilitator /Jerree G. Lon: Range Planning /Carol 3. S ?ECIAL DIST ICTS Fire District (pick -up box) ( Tigard Water Detartment 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard, OR 97223 Tualatin Valley Water District �Jnified Sewerage Agency /SWM ?ro;ram _ 6501 SW Taylors Ferry Rd. 155 N. First Sc. Tigard, OR 97223 Hillsboro, OR 97124 4. AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS Wash. Co. Land Use & Transp. _ Boundary Commission 150 N. First Ave. 320 SW Stark Room 530 Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97204 Brent Curtis Kevin Martin _ METRO - GREENSPACES PROGRAM Mike Borreson Mel -uie (CPA's/ZOA's) Scott King 500 NE Grand - Fred Eberle Portland, OR 97 :32 -273: _ JLC =_ :C =A's /ZOA's) City of Beaver: :. - - St - Jim Hendryx - Principal Planner Bale -., C.. 97310 -0590 ?O Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 3, Dt' _ City of King C :: o'_ Durha,, City Manager :ft Manager 15300 SW 116th PO c x 23483 -3483 King City, OR :7224 Tigard, OR 97224 _ City of Lake Oswego _ City of Portland City Manager Plar ing Director 380 SW A 112C SW 5th Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Portland, OR 97204 1/ State Highway Division ODCT Bob Doran Lidwten Rahmann PO Box 25412 900: SE McLoughlin Blvd. Portland, OR 9 - 225 -0412 Mil•:auki -e, OR 97222 City of Tualatin PO ?ox 3 Tualatin.. OR 97062 5. 5 ?ECIAL AGENCIES (General Telephone ( Portland General Elec. Engineering Office Brian Moore PO Box 23416 14655 SW old Scholls Fry. Tigard, OR 97281 -3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 / / NW Natural Gas _ Metro Area Communications /// Scott Palmer Jason Hewitt 220 NW Second Ave. Twin Oaks Technology Center Portland, OR 97209 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Beaverton, CR 97006 -4886 _ TCI Cablevision of Oregon Linda Peterson _ US West 3500 SW Bond St. Pete Nelson Portland, OR 97201 421 SW Oak 5t. Portland, OR 97204 _ Columbia Cable (Frank Stone) 14200 SW Brigadoon Ct. Tri -Met Transit Dev. Beaverton, OR 97005 Kim Knox 710 NE Holladay Sc. 6. STATE AGENCIES Portland, OR 97232 _ Aeronautics Div. (ODOT) DOGAMI _ Division of State Lands _ Commerce Dept. - M.H. Park OTHER Fish & Wildlife PUC Dept. of Environ. Quality 7. FEDERAL AGENCIES Corps. of Engineers Post Office 8. OTHER _ Southern Pacific Transportation Company Duane M. Forney, PLS - Project Engineer 800 NW 6th Avenue. R. 324, Union Station Portland, OR 97209 COMMUNI" NEWSPAPERS !NCO ,, P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Not1 a TT ' 7 9 2 2 BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075 RECEIVE Legal Notice Advertising SU 2 1994 • Cit y of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice F`TIGARD 1312 5 SW Hall Blvd. or( %J. J.,---_- • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit • • A SrTE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94-0011 • HOLLANDBURGERVILLE. LOCATION:' 15650 S.W. Direct' B ' Ferry Rd (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300). The 1 - approved, subject to conditions, a Site Development Review requ • allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restauran AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION " PLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code 1 tens 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.12 STATE OF OREGON, ) ..18.164. ZONE: C-G (General Commercial). The C-G zone allows ; COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) t agency and administrative services, public support facilities, profes I, Kathy Snyder and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate set business support services general retail sales,.and eating and drinki being first duly sworn , depose and say that 1 am the Advertising tablishments among other , uses. Director, or his principal clerk, of theT Tualatin � � a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010! ' • and 193.020; published at Tigard ( r . - • aforesaid county and state• that the in that Land Partition 9 -0008 Krukowski • emboli us a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the ‘ he 0 • entire issue of said newspaper for ONF, successive and . consecutive in the following issues: June 16,1994 PI 4KL12"11A—CLIZ------- Subscribed and sworn to ore me thisl6th day of June, l , sift 6.4, Not ublic for Oregon ...116 . My Commission Expires: • AFFIDAVIT . . • / S. kill ' • The ailapw.d finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditio► obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 1: Hall Blvd., P.O. Box 23397, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The deci�'S final on June 29. 1994. Any party to the decision may appeal in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 111:32.3' Community Development Code, which provides that a written ap - be filed within 10 d 3 s after notice 9. given and sent. The dea filing of an appeal ' 1T7922 -PublistrJune 16,1994. • • \STANDARDS 0 � • OscX 248 4z51 � f -AEMOVE EXISTING /. / , \ /.. • FENCE r .�-- -- EXISTING ASPHAL". �' ---"-- 6 • i _ *\ y #.--> a0 m� ` 2c_ 0 • R 33 ( __ .. . • '- . ,, ,;/-1-c- • z �' a' r ;� , / , , T -- ASPHALTIC , ii.,-p- / ' DRIVE �� / ; m I 1 l .. r � I N "4 001 ! . :, ,10 \ � �•' S'GN .:�'_ = •MENU BOARD —J CLEARANCE -----"• 'ER ITY 'i,� . 15'x' R; . " - FENCED — ma SIGN • / '. ST • DARDS cv PLAY AREA CLEARANCE N .. ! , 11'. � ' CITY pommel. • CONCRETE WALK ST 0 5 1 : � 111 i • = - AND CURB (TYPICAL) i i� 2 i • 7 � - DINING — 1 R �+ • ' 780 SF MI ASPHALTIC PAVING - ----- ass • _lain (TYPICAL) ; --a_ `1 1,, W K tig C ' :. . _ .. I •'. NEW BICYCLE RACK — A ' E M N T E : •;1 1 • r BURGERVILLE R: A � _f •L +. 1 •, aO U SA � :.:11:wl, STRIPIN G (TPAINTED PARKINGYPICAL) 0 ( a r m — ini .2, Imo I . ' • ' ^ ACC ESSIBLE I .0 • S 0),.... IN . , 1 PAR RAMP � 4' 41 2 0 6'21/2 � .',ao ------ ------ ' 13' 6 " I10' 6 " I i a a 112 0 '' 36' 0 I 1 8 0 11 , • .55 25' 0 8 ACS E ' 'All • SSiBLE RA • • Ml11`0 ��i� �_ ( TY•ICAL) 4 Y ' ' I C ONCRETE CUR 0 0 R (TYPICAL) - EXISTING FENCE - + RETAINING WALL 1 ---/ C RETE CURB m ASPHALTIC MASONRY 1 • DRIVE. TRASH ENCLOSURE �_ ASPHALTIC— DRIVE i `V EXISTING 20' 0 - 20' 0 SIGN j 1 EXISTING ' BUILDING 401'• • c • ; • m • DIRECTIONAL EXISTING V ' S 82D 2'00" W 125.03" N ASPHALTIC /-�, / / / / SURFACE i / / co I I I/ nv.n�n in �. nvun N ' . . MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Will D'Andrea May 25, 1994 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer n ( RE: SDR 94-00a HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE /BOONES FERRY RD. Description: The applicant proposes to re- construct a 0.6 acre at site #15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road to provide for a 2,570 sq. ft. drive - through restaurant. Findings: 1. STREETS: This site is located on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road, at the common driveway shared by the Sherwood Inn and the adjacent Chevron gas station. SW Upper Boones Ferry Road is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as an Arterial street and has been constructed to City standards with the exception of the curb and sidewalk along the frontage of the proposed site. The applicant's preliminary site plan includes the completion of the required street improvements. The applicant has submitted a traffic study for the site, prepared by Tom R. Lancaster, P. E., dated May, 1994. The traffic report prepared for the proposed Burgerville restaurant indicates that the site will generate approximately 94 vehicle trips per peak hour. The traffic report also indicates that the intersection presently operates at a Level of Service "D" and that with the additional traffic generated by the proposed restaurant, the Level of Service is estimated to operate at the Level "E ". The traffic report further indicates that the primary movement exiting the existing driveway onto SW Upper Boones Road is the eastbound right -turn and that to facilitate the traffic exiting the site, the driveway should be striped with separate left - turn and right -turn only lanes. The site plan for the proposed restaurant should be revised to include these recommendations. As noted, the existing driveway serves two additional businesses. In 1990, under SDR 89 -23, the Sherwood Inn obtained approval for an expansion of their site. A condition of that approval was to re- construct the driveway with curbs and a sidewalk. The construction plan for the driveway was approved, but the permit was put in abeyance at the request of the Sherwood Inn, who wanted to defer the construction until the development of the site now under consideration. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -11 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE PAGE1 • Included in the variance for the Sherwood application, was the approval of the use of only one driveway for the combined site at a width of 24 feet. However, with this application which includes additional information by the traffic engineer, the entrance to the driveway at SW Upper Boones Ferry Road should be widen as noted above. In addition, the applicant should provide for a joint use and maintenance agreement for the driveway that enjoins all three property owners to share equally the responsibility for the maintenance in perpetuity. There are no overhead facilities along SW Upper Boones Ferry Road and the street lighting has been installed. No further construction is required relative to these items. 2. SANITARY SEWER: The site served by the existing 8 inch public sanitary sewer that is located in SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. The applicant proposes constructing a new service lateral to the main. The existing sewer has sufficient capacity to serve this development. 3. STORM SEWER: The existing site currently drains on the surface to the existing driveway located along the westerly side of the property. The applicant indicates on the preliminary utilkty plan that existing public storm drain in SW Upper Boones Ferry Road will be extended to the site and that a private underground system will be constructed to connect to pipe in the street. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on- site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. Section 7.10b of the above noted Resolution and Order cites conditions under which the fee in -lieu may be accepted. Specifically, it provides, that if, "The site is small compared to the development plan, and the loss of area for the on -site facility would preclude the effective development. ", the fee may apply. It is our opinion that this site is consistent with this criteria, and we recommend that a fee in -lieu be required. ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -11 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE PAGE2 Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. Curb and sidewalk shall be constructed along the site frontage on SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. The applicant shall obtain a Street Opening Permit from the Engineering Department for the street improvements, including the proposed sewer and storm drain construction. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171). 2. The site plan shall be revised to include the recommendations of the traffic engineer to provide separate left -turn and right -turn lanes exiting the site. The entrance shall be widened to a width of 34 feet for a minimum distance of 40 feet. STAFF CONTACT: Michael Anderson, Engineering Department (639- 4171) 3. Two (2) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171). 4. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on City standard forms for the common driveway. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: Diane Jelderks, Engineering Department (639- 4171) . APPROVED Randal R. Wooley, ity Engineer N: \ENGINEER \SDR99- 11.m]a ENGINEERING COMMENTS SDR94 -11 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE PAGE3 06/14/94 11:14 $ 5037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 C(7j 002/002 • • Oregon June 14, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. TRANSPORTATION Tigard, OR 97223 Region 1 Attention: William D'Andrea FILE CODE: Subject: Site Development Review 94 -0011, Holland/Burgerville ODOT has reviewed the application and traffic study for the proposed Burgerville to be located on Upper Boones Ferry Road. There is no problem with the traffic study and we believe it adequately addresses the site generation, the level of service, and the driveway location. The following represents ODOT's requirements for Burgerville to access Upper Boones Ferry Road: • A permit is required for all work in the state right -of -way (for example, approach road, curb and sidewalk...etc.). • Frontage improvements along the highway will be required (for example, curb and sidewalk, drainage facilities, and pavement -as per ADA standards. • On -site detention will be required if the applicant needs to connect to the state drainage system. Thank you for the opportunity to share our concerns. If you have further questions, please call me at 731 -8281. � Laurie Nicholson Region 1 Planning Assistant cc: Sam Hunaidi 9002 SE McLoughlin / Milwaukie, OR 97222 -7394 MO 02-93) �/ (503) 731 -8200 FAX (503) 731 -8259 06/14/94 11:13 $5037318259 ODOT - REGION 1 001/002 • - • FAX DATA SHEET TO: DATE: if TIME: cg • / 1: . • M LOCATION: NO. OF PAGES (including cover page): 1 FAX NO.: 7”7 FROM: - ODOT, REGION 1 9002 SE McLoughlin Blvd. (If not received correctly, call Milwaukie, OR 97222 FAX (503) 731-8259 (503) 731 -8200) Special Instruction: Message: ( 1 Confidential [ l Urgent ( 1 Please reply [ l For your information [ l As requested 1 :,1 • • /30 �� REOIISS T FOR COMMENTS TO : Pia " eilf CL - 1 // (e c DATE: May 17, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0011 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE LOCATION: 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300)..' A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restaurant. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. • From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you •wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 27, 1994: You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: r - We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: • Name of Person Commenting: etibNA-) I Phone Number: SIC) - l3E1-..4 • V • • RECEIVED PLANNING MAY 2 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO : �J e ( e ` /`0 DATE: May 17, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0011 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE LOCATION: . 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and .1300) A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restaurant. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100,.18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish • to comment on this application, we•need your comments by May 27 1994. You may • use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your .comments . If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with.your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding. this mattes, contact the .Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: . William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: )G We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • Written Comments: DEV (l Lo PGA, P(A-CE C_c i T Fv 2 'rE-LE. P(40 0E_ 6EA CE GT"e' S 6Pe_c.t�(64 Name of Person Commenting: T(r■ VJ(estAtfrt ) . Phone Number: (02_o-5.943 /// ‘7 0o h en F /o . REOUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: / l� DATE: May 17, 19.94 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0011 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE LOCATION: . 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300).• A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restaurant. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and. agencies, and from other • information available to our staff,•a report and•recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish• to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 27, 1994. You may • use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone 'the staff contact noted'below. with your Comments and confirm your comments in writing, as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding.this matter, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • • We have reviewed the:proposal and have no objections to it.. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. . - Written Comments: agettigk11..� c _LcAtt.L 6 i. � e . e ! • Name of Person Commenting:. Phone Number: . ! / �J REOUEST FOR COMMENTS TO: QC' 75. DATE: May 17, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0011 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE LOCATION: 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restaurant. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared . • and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 27, 1994. You may • use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon a possible: •If you have any questions regarding this matter,• contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea • PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: • We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. X Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Com �� i r / h mentts : L / f _ / lt r I , 1 S i E ( e s -p {� ,��,, 41,4)^ / o4 a'I a I 4^4,se1 D. . 6iA ¢K s . vh "I ��irs fa 6r- Lad , c k'e is . . . . Name of Person Commenting: / ksMiV Phone Number: %I J 1. 1 R FOR COMMENTS TO : L /G1 � � i0e70 C �� - I � DATE: May 17, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0011 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE LOCATION: 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restaurant. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your .review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a and recommendation will be prepared. and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 27 1994. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please the staff contact noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact the Tigard Planning •Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: . We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written Comments: The relocation of the existing fire hydrants will be approved through the Water Department. The developer is responsible for all cn Associated with the relocations (if needed). Fire hydrants and water meters are not allowed in paved or concrete areas. Also the 2" water meter on the. west side of the property (near the entrance from Upper Rennes Ferry) must be protected at all times. This water meter serves the Sherwnna Tnn. Name of Person Commenting: . / Phone Number: �( 3qs 1 III III . 7/ REQUEST FOR COMMENTS TO : / /`( De ' DATE : May 17, 1994 FROM: Tigard Planning Department • RE: SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SDR 94 -0011 HOLLAND /BURGERVILLE LOCATION :.' • 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Rd (WCTM 2S1 12DD, tax lots 1200 and 1300). A request for Site Development Review approval to allow construction of a 2,570 square foot Burgerville USA restaurant. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120 and 18.164. ZONE: C -G (General Commercial) The C -G zone allows public agency and administrative services, public support facilities, professional and administrative services, financial, insurance, and real estate services, business support services, general retail sales, and eating and drinking establishments among other uses. Attached is the Site Plan and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other • information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared . • and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the•near future: •If you wish • to comment on this application, we need your comments by May 27, 1994. You may, use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to .return your comments. • • - •If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact • noted below with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact'the•Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223. PHONE: 639 -4171. STAFF CONTACT: William.D'Andrea PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:. We have reviewed the proposal and have no.objections•to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • Written Comments: 1 ) )2 f7. 7 t2 e. it 7 es�.J d 1 1 S i ' Ai L. :� .--% y 40V,..�v✓ 7� S zi d 14 c_ (-0 L..q r7 ev.> S r4 A r- . _, �'JL. l'- A - cri. y A /a P ai o J z- .%) k(� FT �—� w, as OS 3 0 G C� y �� C .� fT _)T ! • b t( ( ) ( ✓L .9 /_,) IAti� a .�'. / . `0 A) U Por y/ K 10J.< - ,5 ' 1, W 3 cif K-r, c� (37._ / /l .5 r eAlki ,j�jM. Name of Person Commenting: V�, Phone Number: a ) Y F:::P in- 2-4 15 o ,t r\) - - 5 1"-- 1,,,„ i ,ziv tear>�,Jc 7" t.1- w (,)e (9.40, ----- c1z' y S 1 $45 -3 /4 1.4-, s <` ►ot - yam X . N 0 t �,L- K t („ l...., , FT 0-1._ Lea IN)... le , T . bg- L) 2 0 ,a.� i y t k 0 tu 5 , ,,,,...,:i x "1-2„ it 0 i 4 r ) i /'�10 t '-L c , : 060, ,,. o sue' y T - s � I,. - ,,►.,,+- ,,,.,040 -z O�o�, , __ ( s _ - r . _ , . — to ( 25.7A , % f ' e„ V • c7'� % /0 /r— 41 '53 l s r- � ,y,„/ ��ae- � � ys- 41- c d v a rit.) it) a rt 1 - - 1 S - . TN) " / $ Y F 1 — I r vow M x 11 d � y 1 ^ \ G L R r d0 S O to 'fi +� � .' p O R O i N 1 + „ aCD '~ 9 f.'” E p ♦i 1 O tl l 11 °M I OD CO c o I g Lmi - ! Will".°5 I I 72ND AV D z 72ND AVE MO -■ 11111 64. f 1 �1 o 0 a y1� v f D „ 0 o r s pp i : R * R p +p '� 9,� + \04 pK WV /^ ' SEQUOIA PAW 11111r ■4glik drilakk 4.----------------1 n n z 5 (1) in m IIIIIiiim -�� —I , . . z m 0 • 0 0 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DEPT. : '�`, architects associative November 16, 1994 JOB MEMORANDUM Project: Burgerville USA -15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road. Reference: Response to the conditions of approval to the City of Tigard Planning Commission. Case number: SDR 94 -0011. Attention: City of Tigard Planning Department. SECTION I - DECISION 1. The curb and sidewalk will be provided as required. See the revised Site Plan on Sheet 1. A Street Opening Permit will be obtained as required. 2. The Site Plan has been revised to reflect the required access. 3. The public improvement plans and profile construction drawings will be submitted at a later date. 4. The joint use and maintenance agreement will be submitted at a later date. 5. a. The revised impervious surface / landscape calculations are indicated on the revised Site Plan on Sheet 1. b.. Additional street trees have been indicated and can be found on Sheet L -1. c. Clear vision requirements have been revised and can be found on Sheet L -1. d. The chosen method for the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage will be submitted at a later date. 6. Tree removal permits will be obtained for trees being removed from the site that have a trunk 6" or more in diameter when measured 4' above the ground. 7. All site improvements per the revised Site Plan will be satisfied prior to issuance of the occupancy permits. 8. The required signs are indicated on the revised Site Plan on Sheet 1. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE LIST (NON EXCLUSIVE) 1. Work will not begin until the city has been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued the city will be notified when work is resumed. Burgerville USA -Upper Boones Ferry Conditions of Approval Page 1 architects associative SECTION - II - FINDINGS OF FACT 1 -3. Background information is accepted as written. 4. The potable water line that services the Sherwood Inn Restaurant most likely traverses the proposed building zone. The suspected water meter is shown on Sheets C1 and C2. Additional buried utilities not known at this time may be present. Abandonment and/or relocation of existing utilities locate under the abandoned or proposed buildings is called for in the engineering demolition notes and the water line relocation specifically on Sheet C2. In response to the Water Department comment, the existing fire hydrant and water meter located at the Northwest corner of the property are to be relocated behind the new sidewalk as indicated on Sheet C2. 5. The fire hydrant locations will meet approval of the Fire Marshall's office and the City of Tigard Water department. Related signage is indicated on the revised Site Plan on Sheet 1. Onsite stormwater detention has been designed in conformance to the Oregon Department of Transportation requirement that the property's peak rate generated during a 10 year, 24 hour storm does not increase due to development. The detention system is detailed on Sheets C2 and C3. Hydraulic analysis of the system is described in the accompanying drainage report. Conduit for telephone service will meet GTE requirements. SECTION - III - ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION A. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Accepted as written. For further elaboration refer to the following: Street Trees: The street trees have been revised as required. Refer to the revised Landscape Plan on Sheet L -1. Visual Clearance Areas: The clear vision areas are indicated as required. Refer to the revised Site Plan on sheet 1 and the revised Landscape Plan on Sheet L -1. Mixed Solid Waste and recyclable Storage: The chosen method for the Mixed Solid Waste and Recyclable Storage will be submitted at a later date. Tree Removal: Tree removal permits will be obtained for trees being removed from the site that have a trunk 6" or more in diameter when measured 4' above the ground. Burgerville USA -Upper Boones Ferry Conditions of Approval Page 2 e J architects associative B PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: 1. Accepted as written. The joint use and maintenance agreement will be submitted at a later date. 2. Accepted as written. 3. The Site is small and the fee in -lieu is accepted as the means to comply with the required Water Management Regulations. SECTION V. PROCEDURE 1 -4. Accepted as written. Attachments: (1 print each) 22 x34 of Sheets 1,3, C -1, C -2, C -3, L -1, and L -2. (1 copy) Drainage Report • Daniel C. Purgiel / • 8515 -b n.e. hazel dell avenue architects associative architecture vancouver, washington 98665 incorporated planning fax: (206) 574 -8378 lightheart & mckinney interior design phone: (206) 574 -701 Burgerville USA -Upper Boones Ferry Conditions of Approval Page 3 DRAINAGE REPORT Burgerville, USA Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, Oregon Prepared by: Hopper & Dennis Consulting Engineers and Planners 205 E 11th Street, Suite LL1 Vancouver, WA 98660 (206) 695 -3488 November 16, 1994 CERTIFICATE OF ENGINEER Upper Boones Ferry Road Burgerville Drainage Report The technical information and data contained in this report were prepared under the direction and supervision of the undersigned, whose seal, as a professional engineer licensed to practice as such, is affixed below. • This document was: Prepared by: 1 ,e4 David teen, E.I.T. • �� �p P R Or � V� y C� G N ` (� • Q' 4 11,3 1) r< - - 1 / Approved by: Brian E. Hopper, P . REG N � Ste, Ar 25 N O P November 16, 1994 Upper Boones Ferry Road Burgerville Hopper & Dennis Engineers Drainage Report JOB #941269 page 2 Soil Map USDA SCS Map 1" = 2000' .,. c.,;. - ,,., 9 . 1' 1.1 •41 i 3 . ::: %.` • -- • . Site Soils include: Briedwell Silt loam C' r icilt . % .. •,.. .. . C. r07 if 'It t ' l • ' : . ... f i l li p ir t 9 #,, loirk • • I; • t , t . it • - A t ••■• . • • -' jj ;• tk, , ._t ,..‘ , ••.1 4I f . 4 • • . ..1:r . ; p , . . „lit . •,, .. tl, 7 11 !. ''4 • I ' IV , 4 :4Y.6 ? "di . ,;•,."...! 4 ! - A r a ..1 v ). : K: %. JI■ei .• 1 ,T- 1 1 ; - 3,, 't ,.; 'i 11 1 r � i q t om lb s' 'i -:. E ; ;1 7, 1 3.• ,:.." -! f. :.. % ; 1 ' K r : ; 1�+"• • :1., .'T - . g ►' : a r . i t " t ' gtr• '1i_'. r 1 ;,...... • • , , . � 'n.t; tj�. ; S , �' ( . ?L� +i'CrYZ;�7 4 • `:� Y. • r w t�r0 ..'�, \ � tt t 'f, � �• } e-tac Ye ! � ^4''t'•1. V�''.�j�' f 2 + � „ ; 1: L ?.•' 14 41tJA •_^�. $31 ,7 1 1 • 5' _ . r e , r � ��I Jt .� 1.23. ► , �• , , } , `� .,.... ,• d n .i t '3, .-., � j,,'`tia�. ' ' . e .1-. ' Y ' I is '' 1 "•''1 -}' .tt : ' y 4 . ,. . 'Xi 7 i',4Ti . g Se ' lel . e. 'k , ,4 1 : , : ,..,, i in, . > � 'C { � ' /. iS t i i; + ` ' .. 1 i '� t `( ".• t +C ay E .r. � . �. ,t ` ' ? ..1•)k.. 12 12 '-% . �. 1 ' . c5.�i� t - •• i . . tiff 1 f� ' i z ei ; : :: - ' , 0,0-. • - t / i . :i . : ,, ,i'i ' st,' ' ,.. 4 .”'i a. .Si rritt 4.22., ), / •. -;': :. • :„11 ',„.4 - • .e0 .p4 t : R B i 4 { ?t%..... 1 . t 1 . . :4 1 .. , Y j , S f ,��7 i l r. e. ;�,• •q V _ ;•+ - i a � • ' • V 1,..4 ' • ., , •� Tj•��. .7f•/ �. , " - ' i �G r _ 1 ^.I: ,... ' . �J cL . ;; % 30 t a?ti r : : f s // `� ' : ' \Y t ' lY ' .. � ;e T. de , . j ' ' ; II n ., t . , R tT� t t , • ..4047.11) rt� _a i1 , ` + y v ti y.. ' 1 ' ' • . � C•• • 1 1 Zr,• • �� � - x • ' tj S� 4. � ' � .al.n. ' 4 et k p 1 . it .� • 1 `'. 1 + t • . ' '�• S • :S ' � �" I • ,� } , ' ,'! ' .it' +���''' i x . 19 , � :� , r ' !�.+ t , f a , � i. yy I. , K , C 5 � . ,v .. t . °t4 ' 1.45;1444 i 6 'ti s ' - • 4 S I : , c 1' i : KV i n @ : 3 t . v . '. V . • ' f.. � i • 12 t r i 1. , ' ' ' + t w I ? 4X\ aYl - )K i I L • i'. Y 1S � a + s `j' ‘:• r " I. : q , •a' �� , i I CJ � go • .,. , ..'..rru' .1V k. , ,3 378 , V. T �ser i , 1 " , . .27r • Y t ', „.41 ' t 1 ; 1. � V i,:i'ai ,. y.3`.' •.218 Qi i f.' t• �S 1 . .:.... . - "m.'.. A:'''''' .ir � 41 r q V A •v �, : ' •,;. Y 1/ .. 11 '.. , t. I ` . ° Y �If.. �,y f ? � tC `: 7 '�aF ( � , rF � ,1 1 a . _ • � ?: <YB •IS ..011184 '�; ::� z s< .c, ;,� ) a .. A ° ; ' 24 � N : . : 2 4 3 f . 7 , 1,:.••••••:.:;:;:t , , �x.40 . �• � . . r vN +� Y . z . � � f . . i , e.. .{ ..P8 ' 4 ' y.:Yf37 to . ,i', }1 ,•„ .. ' • ' C,i', ., A.i .- � e./ .. v . . 3,0 t 4t iF..0. _. V- i .. t r k .37 b ! }: ' r' ;!'• November 16, 1994 Upper Boones Ferry Road Burgerville Hopper & Dennis Engineers Drainage Report Page 4 JO8 #941269 • VICINITY MAPS SE 1 /4,Sec12, T2S, R1W, WM ° �� 77-7,' � . :: -r — — — — — — — — o -- . ;, ' • t4I LESSER _ 1 32 • Y L ' !. t C e r• . i: , = CO PARK �� I , AC•G + ^ i 6, y, ` :r ::i',,,-4,,,:,. S W 10 ".,+'" 0 L�J CT f' =•• < . . : , A I Syy MAINE RD ). RFC i ?•1 rr y�t�i '�+ IA T. Q ....� 00 #ECKET N� y 1 FL. *' . • . � � UNTMER = 'T E . I. '." a _, F Sw 1 r' �» SP 4 t RVA N TES �0t, t i COMMUNITY t '''''...t- 4 I ,+ • I ' .f f" ; ;r s W �' SOUTHVIEWS/� PSI M _ \ qY ST r c . : a , ► H TM A •• Gus w p 1. oe 12 CI c ♦.� •Q. <f,``: l q D AtTM OU T H a= i'. I` S la �� � ,' ' ;, ' I ;,'� a 9. Q 725 0 90 o CT AS ?e,6' �q�+ t .. C CK ` C >• rm a _, : — _ S ST ` — — CC y 1' 4 C n '9 ' \ S 1 — .Nan �k°' ' i '� '1, 1 T O 4<AK[ �-" t. ; ^ 6W e [r' MJ a 1 W m p e`•f , 1 f N (r 1- . AL N q C} v i S IM I �i .j.' , .� L�� V; 6��I SW SOUT ,, t _ m 5 i E U��R E N 1 u i �+cr' A [ • 'ka.::�.• . 2 a74, • NM ? 4 . . � s q � __ >r � � 0, 0 � _ \�, A � 0 1 %1 2 Sw r r • , or. ,y A a ilk' t� 1 • A.• ' i!....,.:,. G+ IRVING I A A t I w: K 'R 1 • IA Y ,r t ; Q' I : v 0 :'i ST SW p t• 1 sw cREsrmw �; 4 g SW WOO ME4ROSE T Q C % � y �� , r Tf ¢ �5 � 3 :. W < VA .T T '. /� won. ( '.c - 7 r CC 'uRO IY CSi ` 1 . r .w.R .v iiYY ,' •* ' ` � `�,; 1.-- - � op .i, . • SW > fIR _ 'lr -: r I ; G � .,•. t lhF,. 4Atirssai — r •• LN L. • I > I ''}, .. �.�-..I 17, < :, 3L p .� �� C• T , 7PV J O " + •q oN , — i O S H 0.0 , , ,,:; +, •• CHER: arm 'iv : • G = . �„ `�A� O Ci „p A I _ �� C T . 7 \ • .• ' ..I . ' , 1'�. F E . n - WH . 0 •a s . 0 ...:s .•.�. A• All .y N• � � K U s 9 sq T ._1 7 < , S . 00 • t • ` I J sw MEADOWS I //R n,v-. r T.�''`' - ea . - SW �BO t:,. 3 i∎ . '* ,: l : . Mr ,. "' '' CT I CT,: •,• a A..% ` �• _ —� —� Q '�"N -- S - -- • — >-- . •L ^ IN ••7 L..� I2, �'� ' a; -;!' � UT > .¢R• m w 9 �P % •• . . - •••- * . . .. : a ; ..:• - . T' I • .......• K ' ' ?:.�_x: G < 0 W RMA a J j�i I S : , f ?:t -y �u. • r A J f. 12 • : . SW SHAKESPEARE 5 ��� ` PARK: G `4 , ,•` ~ • I i 1- ;.: 4 .., z•,• _ • _ } • it RD 8000 : ; O a : t . J • 1 .'• 1st it ' „L: I - - 7 ' 4r 1 ? • •A • D 'u.3 � i . , ' . } '' SW • KAILE • T > ' 1 , GROVE ST 1 ,t f T:'. ! i eJ e KABLt ww'.. . a .P O r .. 1 Imo vi S. 04 Q . \\ \ 1 HARRIN T• ¢ St < i ES N - q 0 �J ' L . . ` . ' r 7 I V ,-.,:. 2 t \ 1 n ' > > 8 000 2 2 M' T ; II i . r n ' 1n,C ;•,'/:. .- EVI A L 'm . � � ....7; _ Q SI - ;: IN : 1 . M Z ;5 : • ` .` i l";_ ' • ear. 1` ' ' P G ` 's. _ +• q� y• • , J @.:,.` ■ , q _.;:. • p y ` a, .,.... ' s' .. > • .. • " - j Pr .`d,. ;?... ; o , ,..o ff . � c 5 ':,3 �« ; �, 2 -B . t 01.011' ; VD" P" • � / `Q I' . ,r !'; < ; Grp •J. �' :T' . 5 . 1 •' " ', D O . r" • 3._ -. � . .t 9 .., 1 � - lz• f D' ' Q Q -.(. - SW Rose-` 1 � ��. • ✓ J H A • , , � SW 'i ^ v ' •N' Q C )" 40 _ N , • tep : •8: 't �! 1 i. ,. P j� ( - % , . • ow000 y \ 3 S # T 5 11 r. Q • t) ie :v ,• . 1 • . •• t ST ENMKN ST I ' b iiii .:.>J''J q �: • ,; , 1 . wiLL • N s w. , r - a •� 9 r a.. i. ( .. Z q E f 1 ' Df,MA - A -� J m ' : • C!T>!..: /ARK: ''• , ! Q .... ' • - ! November 16, 1994 Upper Bowes Ferry Road Burgervife Hopper & Dennis Engineers - Drainage Report JOB #941269 Page 3 Holland Inc., is proposing the construction of a Burgerville fast food restaurant at 15650 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road in the City of Tigard. 15,950 s.f. of paved parking and 4,410 of roof area are to be constructed on a 0.72 acre site. The most recent land use history of the site consisted of a gas station, which has since been removed. Commercial properties border the site on the west and south. _... A majority of the site remains covered by pavement, reducing rainfall infiltration. A portion of this stormwater is handled by two catch basins tied to a set of interconnected • drywells. An overflow pipe out of the northern drywell is assumed to connect to the existing drainage infrastructure to the west. Non - infiltrating rainfall originating outside the catch basins depression zone currently leaves the site at the north west property corner and is directed westerly towards a storm inlet in Upper Boones Ferry Road. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN Site grading has been designed to meet existing pavement elevations and promote drainage away from the building. Via parking lot inlets, stormwater shall be conveyed to a storage pipe with a hydraulically sized outlet. Release from the outlet is conveyed to the existing storm inlet in Upper Boones Ferry Road which currently handles excess surface runoff from the site. Infiltration as a method of stormwater .disposal .has been discouraged by the City of Tigard. It is understood at this time that the catch basin in Upper Boones Ferry Road is • connected to the Oregon Department of Transportation drainage system. ODOT requirements stipulate that development may discharge its stormwater to their system after limiting peak flows to predevelopment levels, analyzed under a 10 year, 24 hour rainfall event. Additionally, ODOT will not accept stormwater from an area that does not naturally drain to the system. The SCS hydrograph method has been utilized to model the rainfall runoff. Calculations were performed using HydroCad Stromwater Modeling System. The software program is based on hydrology techniques developed by the SCS combined with standard hydraulic calculations. For the storm :of interest, hydrographs are generated and routed through the watershed. Curve numbers to define the watershed were obtained from the SCS manual Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (TR -55). Precipitation information was obtained from NOAA isopluvial maps for Oregon State and inserted into a type 1A storm distribution hydrograph. Time of concentration paths are indicated on the drainage basin map. SCS soil maps for Washington County indicate surface soils to be Briedwell silt loam, a type C hydrologic group soil. November 16, 1994 Upper Boones Ferry Road Burgerville Hopper & Dennis Engineers Drainage Report JOB #941269 Page 5 Analysis reveals that the peak discharge produced form the site with vegetative cover (pre - developed condition) during a 10year, 24 hour storm event is 0.3 cfs. Once development has occurred, without stormwater management a peak runoff rate of 0.6 cfs is expected. Control of this peak is achieved through storage in 120 I.f. of 30" diameter pipe and a 2.4" diameter release orifice. 126908,11/10/94 November 16, 1994 UpperBoones Feny Road Burgervile Hopper & Dennis Engineers Drainage Report JOB #941269 Page 6 Data for 1269 BURGERVILLE U.B.F. - PREDEVELOPED SITE Page 1 Prepared by Applied Microcomputer Systems 16 Nov 94 HvdroCAI3'20 0007 (c) 1986-1994 AppliecilMi RUNOFF BY SCS TR-20 METHOD: TYPE IA 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 3.5 IN, SCS U.H. RUNOFF SPAN = 0-24 HRS, dt= .10 HRS, 241 POINTS SUBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) --GROUND COVERS (%CN)-- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF) 1 12.4 100%84 - - - 84 - .3 7.97 .12 • • Data for 1269 BUR6ERVILLE U.B.F. - PREDEVELOPED S%7E Page 2 Prepared by Applied Microcomputer Systems 16 Nov 94 HydroCAD 3.20 000702 (c) 1996-19'144 Applied Microcomputer Sy_stems SUBCATCHMENT 1 ACRES CN .72 84 ASSUME PERVIOUS LAND COVER SCS TR-20-METHOD TYPE IA 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 3.5 IN PEAK= .3 CFS @ 7.97 HRS VOLUME= .12 AF SPAN= 0-24 HRS. dt=.1 HRS Method { Comment _ TR-55 SHEET FLOW 12.4 Grass: Short n=.15 L=200' P2=2.5 in s=.06 '/' \ • � • Data for 1269 BUR6ERVILLE U.B.F. - POST DEVELOPED S]TE Page 1 Prepared by Applied Microcomputer Systems 16 Nov 94 Hydro{AD 3.20 000702 (c) 1986-1994 Applied Microcomputer Systems_ • WATERSHED ROUTING =---------------- --_- =-----=====----------___===== • • 1 | / \1 / \ / \ / • /\ ~ • SUP^ATCANENT REACH pUND LINK • Data for 1269 BURGERVlLLE U.B.F. - POST DEVELOPED SITE Page 2 Prepared by Applied Microcomputer Systems 16 Nov 94 HYdroCAI3. 000702 (c) 1986-1994Aaklied Microcomauter SysterrLs_ RUNOFF BY SCS TR-20 METHOD: TYPE IA 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 3.5 IN, SCS U.H. RUNOFF SPAN = 0-24 HRS, dt= .10 HRS, 241 POINTS SUBCAT AREA Tc WGT'D PEAK Tpeak VOL NUMBER (ACRE) (MIN) --GROUND COVERS (%CN)-- CN C (CFS) (HRS) (AF) 1 .07 2.7 57%98 43%86 - - 93 - .1 7.80 .02 2 .42 5.9 767.98 24%86 - - 95 - .3 7.84 .10 3 .10 .4 100%98 - - - 98 - .1 7.74 .03 4 .13 2.5 85%98 15%86 - - 96 - .1 7.78 .03 . • � • . Data for 1269 BURGERV1LLE U.B.F. - POST DEVELOPED SITE Page 3 Prepared by Applied Microcomputer Systems 16 Nov 9 HydroCAD 3.20 000702 (c) 1986-1994 Applied Micro7r POND ROUTING BY STOR-IND METHOD POND OUTLET START FLOOD PEAK PEAK ---PEAK FLOW--- NO. DEVICES ELEV. ELEV. ELEV. STORAGE Din Qout ATTEN. LAG (FT) (FT) (FT) (AF) (CFS) (CFS) (%) (MIN) 1 1 208.8 211.3 211.3 .01 .5 .2 46 21.1 . . \ • Data for 1269 BURGERVILLE U.B.F. - POST DEVELOPED SITE Page 4 Prepared by Applied Microcomputer Systems 16 Nov 94 HydroCAD 3 .20 00 { 7 }2{c} 1986-1994 qppljed Microcomputer Systpms _______ SUBCATCHMENT 1 NORTH-WESTERN SUBBASIN ACRES CN . 04 98 PAVEMENT SCS TR-20 METHOD . 03 { LANDSCAPING TYPE IA 24-HOUR . 07 93 RAINFALL= 3.5 IN PEAK= .1 CFS @ 7.80 HRS VOLUME= .02 AF SPAN= 0-24 HRS, dt=.1 HRS Method CommeIt Tc|min` TR-55 SHEET FLOW RUNOFF OVER LANDSCAPING 2.4 Grass: Short n=.15 L=40' P2=2.5 in s=.153 '/" RECT/VEE/TRAP CHANNEL CURBLINE FLOW PATH .3 D=.5' SS= 0 & .02 '/' a=6.25 sq-ft Pw=25.5' . r=.245' s=.023 '/' n=.015 V=5.88 fps L=105' Capacity=36.8 cfs Total Length= 145 ft Total Tc= 2.7 SUBCATCHMENT 2 • EASTERN SUBBASIN ACRES CN .32 98 PAVEMENT SCS TR-20 METHOD . 10 86 LANDSCAPING TYPE IA 24-HOUR . 42 95 RAINFALL= 3.5 IN PEAK= .3 CFS @ 7.84 HRS VOLUME= .10 AF SPAN= 0-24 HRS, dt=.1 HRS Metho - Comment _ - _ - _ - _ T�(Oj� TR-55 SHEET FLOW VEGETATIVE GROUND COVER RUNOFF 5.2 Grass: Short n=.15 L=90' P2=2.5 in s=.11 '/' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW RUNOFF OVER PAVEMENT ' Paved Kv=20.3282 L=40' s=.038 '/' V=3.96 fps RECT/VEE/TRAP CHANNEL CONCENTRATED RUNOFF OVER PAVEMEN .5 D=.3' SS= .02 & .04 '/' a=3'38 sq-ft Pw=22.5' r=.15' s=.009 '/' n=.015 V=2.65 fps L=80' Capacity=9 cfs __________ Total Length= 210 ft Total Tc= 5.9 SUBCATCHMENT 3 PROPOSED BUILDING ACRES CN .10 98 SCS TR-20 METHOD TYPE IA 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 3.5 IN PEAK= .1 CFS @ 7.74 HRS VOLUME= .03 AF SPAN= 0-24 HRS, dt=.1 HRS • Method Comment TR-55 SHEET FLOW ------- - . 4 n=.025 L=40' P2=2.5 in s=.3 '/' • 1 Data for 1269 BURGERVILLE U.B.F. - POST DEVELOPED SITE Page 5 Prepared by Applied Microcomputer Systems 16 Nov 94 HydroCAD 3.20 000702 ( 994 A2plied Microco tems • SUBCATCHMENT 4 PERIMETER & FRONTAGE RUNOFF ACRES CN . .11 98 PAVEMENT SCS TR-20 METHOD . 02 86 LANDSCAPING TYPE IA 24-HOUR . 13 96 RAINFALL= 3.5 IN PEAK= .1 CFS @ 7.78 HRS VOLUME= .03 AF SPAN= 0-24 HRS, dt=.1 HRS Method Comment Tc(mil) - TR-55 SHEET FLOW LANDSCAPING RUNOFF 2.4 Grass: Short n=.15 L=15' P2=2.5 in s=.02 '/' SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW SHALLOW FLOW OVER PAVEMENT .1 Paved Kv=20.3282 L=15' s=.03 '/' V=3.52 fps Total Length= 30 ft Total Tc= 2.5 ' ^ � | ^` • . ' Data for 1269 BURGERVILLE U.B.F. - POST DEVELOPED SITE Page 6 Prepared by Applied Microcomputer Systems 16 Nov 944 Hyg2oCAD 3.20 000 Microcomputer POND 1 120 If 30" DIA PIPE STORAGE STARTING ELEV= 208.8 FT • FLOOD ELEV= 211.3 FT _ ELEVATION CUM'STOR STOR-IND METHOD (FT) (CF) PEAK ELEVATION= 211.3 FT 208.8 0 PEAK STORAGE = 589 CF 209.4 109 Qin = .5 CFS 8 7.82 HRS 210.1 310 Qout .2 CFS @ 8.17 HRS 210.7 480 ATTEN= 46 % LAG= 21.1 MIN 211.3 589 IN/OUT= .15 / .15 AF SPAN= 0-24 HRS, dt=.1 HRS INVERT (FT) OUTLET DEVICES 208.8 2.4" HORIZONTAL ORIFICE 0=.62 Area SQR(2gH) TOTAL DISCHARGE (CFS) vs ELEVATION . FEET 0.0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 208.8 1 0.00 .05 .07 .09 .10 .11 .12 .13 .14 .15 209.8 / .16 .16 .17 .18 .18 .19 .20 .20 .21 .22 210.8 | .22 .23 .23 .24 .24 .25 . . 1 • .. .. Data for 1269 BURGERVILLE U. B. F. — POST DEVELOPED SITE F'age 7 Prepared by App 1 ied Microcomputer Systems :16 Nov 9.4 I r °CAD 3. 20 000702 POND '1 INFLOW & OUTTLOLl 120 If 138" DIP PIPE STORAGE . ._, • 40 - STOR-IND METHOD PEAK ELEU= 211 3 FT • _15 - PEAK ciTORL E CF . 30 _ d) 1 (-4- D. i n= .5 CF - (lout= • 2 CFc 20- I \ LRG= 21.1 M I N --, --, , .., ... • 15 - il \ s 's LL , • la - ,/,.. .1y 7:-, ......_______ ri5 - ,.e 4-e" ----1 ! 7.s 1 . 1 , 1 , , 1 , 1 c\..] .z co 17 i,. 7.-r LO 01) I 1, 71 — — _ .._ ..,_ r\J (--,j I: J TIME (houns•) . 1 1 1 BURGERVILLE RESTAURANT UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 1 1 TIGARD, OREGON 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBMITTED BY 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. 1 MAY, 1994 1 1 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering I Traffic Studies Union Station, Suite 206 Planning Safety 800 N.W. 6th Avenue Portland, OR 97209 (503) 248 -0313 FAX (503) 248.9251 BURGERVILLE RESTAURANT Upper Boones Ferry Road Traffic Impact Study Tigard, Oregon 1 1 EaC R �VS �� �G I N PR F fr f��� 1 8054 G IP 22, I A' c;% 9s R. LAO (l •3I -9 1 Prepared By TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. 1� KATHERINE W. LAI May, 1994 1 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Location Description 4 Trip Generation 9 Trip Distribution 11 • Operational Analysis 14 1 Summary 17 Appendix 18 1 1 1 1 1 I -1- TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering r INTRODUCTION 1 A Burgerville restaurant has been proposed for a location in Tigard on Upper 1 Boones Ferry Road adjacent to the Interstate 5 interchange. It will have a drive -up roadway with two windows as well as indoor seating. The only access to the site will be from an existing joint -use driveway on Upper Boones Ferry Road. The purpose of this study is to assess the traffic impact of the proposed devel- I opment on the nearby roadway system, particularly with regard to the intersection of Upper Boones Ferry Road and the joint -use driveway. The study will include a level of service analysis. Detailed information on level of service standards, traffic counts, trip genera- tion calculations, trip distribution, and level of service calculations is included in the appendix to this report. 1 1 1 1 1 1 -2- i , MEADOWS 1 m I -- \ RU40 C •� p / s W I � O ' r e,- `O o a. • a I ° � Cr 60NITA I a `z; ROAD C./. ! V ,INDFIELD : LOOP •••• 0... 1 \` 1 LANGFORD f ) LN. l � ■ ; vi 9 Q TIGARD Z K BA L papa \ +J PARK HELL ST• Pop. 20,765 1 m BURMA RD. G \�9 OPTS Pt I. =1 \ � yP\ OP _ g ` SHA KESPEARE RD. BALNE ST. ` / ci OAK RIDGE o . P Q� � a > I FIRWOOD RD. L ql n a < _ Sr KA LE LN. 1 J J • J Q HARRINCTON AVE. m s MADRONA ST. J F s a 1 c �� Q y , J a SEVILLE A VE. 1 . n.• W. SUET OR, e pp La `' Wn w oI I � aJ z 1 a Irpr 1 p °� j ¢ n w Q o upPf a ` ` lw � m I �m 1 Project 1 - WASHINGTON a , �P Site 1 R I < I I � A A 0 ......_.....--- I Q > = 1 .f I_ z W I 9 LFROST ST. o� u J u ' �OwEF ° y t . MACE OSWEGO CITY LIMITS) TSB Z n ` St aO a LLi I a al ' 'w CO �P Rer. 0 e) -4p J f l � o 1 ROSEWOOD 4� I ii i ST. 1 ` P WILDW000 1 �° � ci C ¢ s • a i Q WILLOW LN. — '6RADBUR > LLi ' c- `� CITY LIMITS) ' C3111 a vP 1 a -_+ LN. la p I t—) i Y ,o u.& E OSAfCO 2 L- c J J (— N W 2 O m 1 J p I a�S N RD. JEAN c n RD. z a • e 0 Q , 9 JI I F O ff° QO' , � y �7 + ` � F 4• I c O CT. °� 6RY&NT IP 1 e Q� y y I �c+ I 6ELMORE v SC ROOL 9j i ^ Yi O / °, � � 1 I W C T. ! A` `` '' 1 / s e .° ' WAY "J r 1? ��4, / <, J j' J wow L N / KENNEY ST. m KENNEY VICINITY MAP Q • 1 W \\ l7• ..\,, TER ' Y a FERNBR00K .0 ?ERNK � y CT W ( �/ ° 4. //. ,� (cm. W AY TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. c^ 4 � / / �� FERN6ROOK 1 r / \ 9y / ° Consulting Transportation Engineer J -3- 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering LOCATION DESCRIPTION The proposed Burgerville restaurant will be located on Boones Ferry Road in Tigard in the southwest quadrant of the Interstate 5 interchange. It will be 2,570 square feet in size, and will have a drive -up window as well as indoor seating. The develop- ment will have frontage on the south side of Upper Boones Ferry Road. • On the west side of the restaurant property is an existing driveway that is shared by a Chevron service station and by the Sherwood Inn restaurant and motel. This driveway will be used by the Burgerville restaurant for access to Boones Ferry. Access to the driveway from the Burgerville restaurant will be located at the south end of the Burgerville site. Upper Boones Ferry Road, which is under the jurisdiction of the City of Ti- t gard, is classified as an arterial. In the vicinity of the site, Upper Boones Ferry is a five -lane street with a continuous center left -turn lane. Parking is prohibited on both sides of the street. The posted speed zone is 35 mph. There is a striped bike lane on the south side of Boones Ferry west of the site location, but there are no bike lanes east of ' the site or on the north side of Boones Ferry. Both sides of Boones Ferry are curbed with sidewalks. The shared Sherwood Inn driveway is controlled by a STOP sign at its entrance to Boones Ferry. The Interstate 5 interchange with Upper Boones Ferry Road is a diamond -type interchange with both ramp terminals signalized. The intersection with the west ramp terminals is located 200 feet east of the Sherwood Inn driveway to be used by the Bur- 1 gerville restaurant. west of 1-5 is typically in the vicinity of the site typ Y commercial, with retail businesses and office parks predominating. The Burgerville site is presently va- cant. Bus service is provided by Tri -Met route number 37 on Upper Boones Ferry Road. Route 37 has thirty- minute frequencies during the morning peak hours, forty- minutes frequencies during the evening peak hours, and two -hour frequencies during '1 off -peak hours. No bus service is available after 6 p.m. or during weekends. 1 1 -4- TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering Manual turning movement traffic counts were made at the intersection of the Sherwood Inn Driveway and Upper Boones Ferry Road. These counts were made on March 14, 1994 from 4 to 6 PM. Morning peak -hour counts were not made because the Burgerville will not be open in the morning. The evening peak hour was found to be from 4:45 to 5:45 PM for the intersection. The existing evening peak -hour volume is shown on the traffic flow diagram on page six. The detailed count summaries are included in the appendix to this report. A map showing the proposed location of the Burgerville restaurant is on page seven. A vicinity map showing the existing lane configuration of the intersection of Upper Boones Road and the . Sherwood Inn Driveway is on page eight. 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 (. 1 N r Ln 0 L cb 1 1 4 1 1 a � 6 1 A T A(. 1 St a... dc,Y 1 ° � 1 �° < <A 1 <<' �� I <b. � JQ<z eic TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing Traffic 1 PM Peak Hour TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. ` Consulting Transportation Engineer J 1 1 _ 1 %V f y • R ° °d e • 00 3 6( Bo° °es . $ 111419 Chevron Gas Station • `. .................... 1 w Lo b / L t I O � Parking > > Lot o 0 h J q 1 Best Western Motel 1 1 1 Site Location TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. 1 Consulting Transportation Engineer J t -7- 1 / 1 1 1 I N► 1 o �Q / 1 r / / CO // / 1 1l /4) i / j r / 1 / s/ / Ro° / ll '■ pi i ef (1 V es / / / / / 40,.„. Project Il / � \a�lltC� Chevron 7 1 1 e Roadway 1 Configuration TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. 1 ` Consulting Transportation Engineer / -8- t TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering TRIP GENERATION 1 To estimate the number of trips that will be generated by the proposed Burger - ville restaurant, trip rates from TRIP GENERATION, Fifth Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, were used. The trip rates used were for land -use code 834, Fast Food Restaurant With Drive - Through Window, which is based on the gross square footage. For this project, the planned size of 2,570 square feet was used. The calculations indicate that there will be an estimated total of 94 trips gener- ated by the Burgerville restaurant during the evening peak hour. Of these, 49 will be entering and 45 will be exiting the site. The estimated daily trip volume will be 1630 trips. Half will be entering and half will be exiting the site. The Burgerville will not be open for business during the morning peak hour. 1 Based on information from the TRIP GENERATION manual, it was assumed that about 46 percent of the trips generated by the restaurant would be pass -by trips. These are trips that are presently occurring on Upper Boones Ferry Road which would stop at the restaurant. The remaining trips were assumed to be either new trips added to the street system or existing trips on other streets that will be diverted to the site. It is also possible that many of the trips will be pedestrian trips from the nearby Sherwood Inn motel, offices, and business park. Although Tri -Met transit service is available, the frequencies are low and no bus stops are adjacent to the development site. Also, the percentage of Burgerville cus- tomers using the bus service is likely to be very small. For these reasons, no reduction 1 in trip generation was made for transit usage. A summary of the trip generation calculations is shown in the following table. The trip generation calculations are included in the appendix to this report. 1 1 1 -9- 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering 1 1 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Burgerville Restaurant ENTERING EXITING TOTAL TRIPS TRIPS TRIPS PM PEAK HOUR 49 45 94 1 WEEKDAY 815 815 1630 1 1 1 1 1 1 -10- 1 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 1 In determining the directional distribution of the trips that will be generated by the proposed Burgerville Restaurant, it was assumed that the trips would be distributed approximately in proportion to the existing traffic volumes using the Sherwood Inn Driveway to and from Upper Boones Ferry Road. Separate directional distributions 1 were calculated for entering and exiting site traffic. The traffic flow diagrams on page 12 show the distribution of the projected 111 peak -hour site - generated trips by the Burgerville restaurant. The traffic flow diagram on page 13 shows the total of existing traffic volumes 1 plus the trips generated by the restaurant. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -11- 1 • I 1 , N, L. , A 4,, „ I i c t� y JQQ 1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Site Trips PM Peak Hour TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Consulting Transportation Engineer 1 -12- 1 1 I AI 1 I^` W I O i a) 1 1 \■.# 1 1 o 1 A I V ®�� 1 oa ei I 0° 1 \)QQ 1 1 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Site + Existing Traffic I PM Peak Hour TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. ` Consulting Transportation Engineer 1 -13 - 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 1 Capacity Analysis 1 To determine the level of service at the intersection of the Sherwood Inn Driveway and Upper Boones Ferry Road, a capacity analysis was conducted. The level of service can range from A, which indicates very little or no delay, to level F, which indicates a high degree of congestion and delay. Level E is generally considered to be the minimum acceptable level of service for unsignalized intersections in urban areas. ' The capacity analysis was made for (1) existing conditions, and (2) existing traffic plus site - generated volumes. The analysis was made for the evening peak traffic 1 hour. The intersection was analyzed using the appropriate methods in the HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL, Special Report 209, published by the Transportation Research ' Board. The capacity analysis shows that with existing traffic volumes, the Sherwood Inn driveway is presently operating at level of service D. When site - generated volumes ' are added to existing volumes, the level of service will decrease to E. These levels of service are the overall driveway level of service based on a single shared exit lane on ' the approach to the intersection. The levels of service for the individual turning move- ments are E for the left turn from the driveway to Boones Ferry, A for the right turn from the driveway to Boones Ferry, and D for the left turn from Boones Ferry to the driveway. These levels of service for the individual movements remain unchanged with the addition of traffic from the Burgerville restaurant. The results of the capacity analysis, with the Levels Of Service (LOS) and the Reserve Capacity (RC) for the unsignalized driveway, are shown in the following table. The Reserve Capacity is a measure of capacity remaining at the intersection. 1 1 1 1 -14- 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering 1 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY 1 Access Drive/ Upper Boones Ferry Road LOS RC PM Peak Hour Existing Conditions D 116 1 Existing + Site E 43 LOS = Level v l of Service RC = Reserve Capacity 1 1 Lane Configuration There is presently a center left -turn lane on Boones Ferry at the driveway inter- section which can be used by westbound traffic destined for the driveway. There is about 200 feet of storage length in the turn lane between the driveway and the next in- tersection to the east, which is the I -5 freeway ramp intersection. This section of turn lane is not used by eastbound traffic because left turns are not permitted at the freeway ramp intersection. The estimated maximum left- turning queue length for the driveway during the evening peak hour, assuming completion of the Burgerville restaurant, is 60 feet. This 1 is less than the available storage space of 200 feet. 1 1 -15- 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering To reduce delays to traffic on the Sherwood Inn driveway, two lanes could be striped approaching Boones Ferry. The left lane would be striped as a left -turn lane, ' and the right lane would be striped as a right -turn lane. This would permit right - turning cars to bypass other cars waiting to turn left. It would not, however, affect traffic flow on Boones Ferry. 1 1 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -16- TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering 1 SUMMARY 1. The intersection of Upper Boones Ferry Road and the Sherwood Inn driveway is ' currently operating at level of service D during the evening peak hour. It will operate at level of service E with the addition of traffic generated by the Burgerville restaurant. ' 2. There is sufficient storage space in the existing left -turn lane on Boones Ferry Road to accommodate the maximum expected queue lengths during the evening peak hour. 1 3. Delays to traffic entering Upper Boones Ferry Road from the Sherwood Inn drive- way could be reduced by striping two lanes on the driveway approaching the intersec- tion. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -17- 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering LEVEL OF SERVICE Level of service is used to describe the quality of traffic flow. Levels of service A to C are considered good, and rural roads are usually designed for level of service C. Urban streets and signalized intersections are typically designed for level of service D. Level of service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. For unsignalized intersections, level of service E is generally considered acceptable. Here is a more complete description of levels of service: 1 Level of service A: Very low delay at intersections, with all traffic signal cycles clearing and no vehicles waiting through more than one signal cycle. On highways, low 1 volume and high speeds, with speeds not restricted by other vehicles. Level of service B: Operating speeds beginning to be affected by other traffic; 1 short traffic delays at intersections. Higher average intersection delay than for level of service A resulting from more vehicles stopping. 1 Level of service C. Operating speeds and maneuverability closely controlled by other traffic; higher delays at intersections than for level of service B due to a signifi- cant number of vehicles stopping. Not all signal cycles clear the waiting vehicles. This 1 is the recommended design standard for rural highways. ' Level of service D: Tolerable operating speeds; long traffic delays occur at in- tersections. The influence of congestion is noticeable. At traffic signals many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. The number of signal cycle failures, for which vehicles must wait through more than one signal cycle, are noticeable. This is typically the design level for urban signalized intersections. Level of service E: Restricted speeds, very long traffic delays at traffic signals, and traffic volumes near capacity. Flow is unstable so that any interruption, no matter how minor, will cause queues to form and service to deteriorate to level of service F. 1 Traffic signal cycle failures are frequent occurrences. For unsignalized intersections, level of service E or better is generally considered acceptable. 1 Level of service F: Extreme delays, resulting in long queues which may inter- fere with other traffic movements. There may be stoppages of long duration, and speeds may drop to zero. There may be frequent signal cycle failures. Level of service F will typically result when vehicle arrival rates are greater than capacity. It is considered unacceptable by most drivers. 1 1 1 111 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1 LEVEL STOPPED DELAY 1 OF PER VEHICLE SERVICE (Seconds) I A <5 B 5 -15 I C 15 -25 25-40 I D E 40 -60 F > 60 1 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA I FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS 1 LEVEL RESERVE 1 OF CAPACITY SERVICE (Cars per Hour) 1 A >400 B 300 -399 1 C 200 -299 D 100 -199 1 E 0 -99 F <0 1 f... INTERSECTION TURN MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY REPORT UPPER BOONES FERRY ROAD AT SHERWOOD INN ACCESS ROAD II • T= 0% P =0. N 10 DATE OF COUNT: 03/14/94 0 10 DAY OF WEEK: Mon R 0 0 0 TIME STARTED: 16:00 11 T TIME ENDED: 18:00 1 H i -1062 4 * -1095 • 0 3 to II T= 2.3% T= 2.7% 1472 —* 4- -1043 P =.783 P =.903 45 1 52 TEV =TOTAL ENTRY VOLUME II 1 �* T= %TRUCKS BY APPROACH P =PHF BY APPROACH 1517 —► 19 0 68 1540 —► Peak Hour 197 16:40 -17:40 Traffic Smithy T= 1.4% P =.75 187 TEV =2699 Traffic Survey Service EAST BOUND SOUTH BOUND NORTH BOUND WEST BOUND FROOMM - PERI TOOD -4 ? I L■ ii r ~ t ALL i l 11 16:00 -16:05 1 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 55 0 180 16:05 -16:10 1 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 75 0 217 II 16:10 -16:15 2 100 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 70 0 176 16:15 -16:20 2 105 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 3 62 0 179 16:20 -16:25 0 72 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 2 72 0 152 16:25 -16:30 2 81 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 6 81 0 178 16:30 -16:35 2 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 81 0 187 II 16:35 -16:40 4 106 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 82 0 196 16:40 -16:45 4 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 88 0 227 16:45 -16:50 2 95 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 3 96 0 205 16:50 -16:55 0 92 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 106 0 203 II 16:55 -17:00 5 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8 88 0 217 17:00 -17:05 7 156 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 4 71 0 250 17:05 -17:10 5 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 93 0 257 17:10 -17:15 4 158 0 0 0 0 2 0 12 3 74 0 253 17:15 -17:20 3 123 0 0 0' 0 0 0 4 5 79 0 214 II 17:20 -17:25 4 130 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 5 91 0 238 17:25 -17:30 6 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 3 81 0 204 17:30 -17:35 1 117 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 3 89 0 218 17:35 -17:40 4 112 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6 87 0 213 I 17:40-17:45 2 104 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 73 0 188 17:45 -17:50 2 115 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 6 104 0 234 17:50 -17:55 1 93 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 4 78 0 182 17:55 -18:00 4 66 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 6 80 0 159 II II II Total Survey 68 2662 0 0 0 0 36 0 110 95 1956 0 4927 PHF .66 .79 0 0 0 0 .68 0 .71 .93 .9 0 .887 I % Trucks 0 2.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 1.1 2.8 0 2.5 Stopped Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peds 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II Hourly Totals 16:00 -17:00 25 1230 0 0 0 0 16 0 46 44 956 0 2317 16:15 -17:15 37 1350 0 0 0 0 19 0 60 44 994 0 2504 16:30 -17:30 46 1449 0 0 0 0 17 0 63 46 1030 0 2651 16:45 -17:45 43 1456 0 0 0 0 20 0 66 47 1028 0 2660 I 17:00 -18:00 43 1432 0 0 0 0 20 0 64 51 1000 0 2610 II TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS Land Use: Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window Land Use Code: 834 Variable: 1000 Sq Ft Gross Floor Area Variable Quantity: 2.58 1 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Trip Rate: 55.6 Trip Rate: 36.5 Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Directional Directional Distribution 0.51 0.49 Distribution 0.52 0.48 Trip Ends BI73 EUBEI:702:11:::30141:::11 Trip Ends fii49EN: 45 94 WEEKDAY SUNDAY Trip Rate: 632 Trip Rate: 515.7 Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Directional Directional 1 Distribution 0.5 0.5 Distribution 0.5 0.5 Trip Ends Trip Ends 1§16051isial: EWE NA331::::§ 111 Source: TRIP GENERATION, Fifth Edition 1 TOM R. LANCASTER, P.E. Transportation Engineering 1 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 1 AM PEAK PM PEAK DAILY Percent New Pass -By Total Percent New Pass -By Total Percent New Pass -By Total ENTER From NE 0% 0 0 0 52% 14 12 26 65% 286 244 530 SW 0% 0 0 0 48% 12 11 23 35% 154 131 285 1 TOTAL 0% 0 0 0 100% 26 23 49 100% 440 375 815 1 EXIT To: NE 0% 0 0 0 77% 19 16 35 65% 286 244 530 1 SW 0% 0 0 0 23% 6 4 10 35% 154 131 285 TOTAL 0% 0 0 0 100% 25 20 45 100% 440 375 815 Pass-By Percentage : 46% 1 1 1 1 II LOCATION:The Driveway & U. Boones Ferry INAME:Existing PM ,HOURLY VOLUMES VOLUMES IN PCPH N Major street:U. Boones Ferry Rd. ==- ____ = N= 2 <-- -V5 - -- 1028 <-- -V5 - -- Grade 1456--- V2 - - -> v-- -V4 - -- 47 --- V2 - - -> v-- -V4 - -- 52 II 0% 43--- V3 - - -v N= 3 ---V3---v Date of Counts: I I March 14, 1994 V7 V9 X STOP IOPD 1 V ' Time Period: 1 Peak Hour 20 66 22 73 Approach Speed: Minor Street: Grade I 35 The Driveway 0% PHF: .85 N= 1 Population: 1000000 ___________ _______________________________ IF = LUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement no. 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 7 1 9 I olume (vph) 1 1456 1 43 1 47 1 1028 1 20 1 66 1 11 Vol(pcph),see Table 10.1IXXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXXI 52 IXXXXXXXXI 22 1 73 STEP 1 : RT From Minor Street / -> V9 1 .=---= Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3 +V2= 22 + 728 = 750 vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 535 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9 =Cp9= 535 pcph = STEP 2 : LT From Major Street ( v -- V4 = == = = == =_____ F onflicting Flows, Vc V3 +V2= 43 + 1456 = 1499 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 215 pcph (Fig.10.3) % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4 /Cp4)x100= 24.2% P4= .82 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.10.5) Cm4 =Cp4= 215 pcph II STEP 3 : LT From Minor Street 1 < -\ V7 Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3 +V2 +V5 +V4= 22 + 1456 + 1028 + 47 = 1700 vph(Vc7) 11 Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp7= 85 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7= Cp7xP4= 85 x .82 = 70 pcph I SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7 +V9) /((V7 /Cm7) +(V9 /Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS t MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM -V) (CSH -V) CM CSH _____ 7 22 70 211 48 116 E D I 9 73 535 211 462 116 A D 4 52 215 163 D II ' + ' LOCATION:The Driveway & U. Boones Ferry 1NAME.Site Exi st PM "HOURLY VOLUMES A VOLUMES IN PCPH N Major street:U. Boones Ferry Rd. I c = - - - - - _ _ _ =aa = a aaa=aa== aaa= aaaaaaaaaaaaaaoa N= 2 <-- -V5 - -- 1016 <-- -VS - -- Grade 1445--- V2 - - -> v-- -V4 - -- 73 --- V2 - - -> v-- -V4 - -- 80 II 0% 66--- V3 - - -v N= 3 - V3 - - -v < > _ = =a_ = = = =_ =- a -- < > aaaaa =a Date of Counts: I I I I .= March 14, 1994 V7 V9 X STOP V7 V9 Time Period: 1 YIELD 1 Peak Hour 30 101 33 111 Approach Speed: Minor Street: Grade I 35 The Driveway 0% PHF: .85 N= 1 Population: 1000000 _- - - --- .... a == =aaa = = =a =a= aaa = =aa =a = .aaaaaa = ..aaaaaa... "VOLUME ADJUSTMENTS Movement no. 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 7 1 9 1 I Volume (vph) 1 1445 1 66 1 73 1 1016 1 30 1 101 ' Vol(pcph),see Table 10.1IXXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXXI 80 lXXXXXXXXI 33 1 111 - == - = aaa=== aaa = == aaa = =a =a =aaa == aaaaaaaaaaaaaa STEP 1 : RT From Minor Street 1 / -> V9 I a = == = a= Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3 +V2= 33 + 723 = 756 vph(Vc9) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp9= 531 pcph (Fig.10.3) I Actual Capacity, Cm Cm9 =Cp9= 531 pcph STEP 2 : LT From Major Street v -- V4 I _= = =_.= =a_ = = == aaa = =_aa =a = =. = = =aa= =aaa_ ==aa_aaaa =a_aa_aa Conflicting Flows, Vc V3 +V2= 66 + 1445 = 1511 vph(Vc4) Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp4= 212 pcph (Fig.10.3) I % of Cp utilized and Impedance Factor (V4 /Cp4)x100= 37.7% P4= .69 Actual Capacity, Cm (Fig.10.5) Cm4 =Cp4= 212 pcph ..ca a == =aaa aa_ =a- - - - -aa =aaa =aaaaaa = =aaa I STEP 3 : LT From Minor Street 1 < -\ V7 __ -- = =aaa_ =aaaaaa=_=aaaa =__ =aaaaaa = =.aaaaaa_.. = =aaaaaa... Conflicting Flows, Vc 1/2 V3 +V2 +V5 +V4= 33 + 1445 + 1016 + 73 = 1700 vph(Vc7) "Critical Gap, Tc Tc= 6.5 secs (Tab.10.2) Potential Capacity, Cp Cp7= 85 pcph (Fig.10.3) Actual Capacity, Cm Cm7 =Cp7xP4 = 85 x .69 = 59 pcph - SHARED LANE CAPACITY SH = (V7 +V9) /((V7 /Cm7) +(V9 /Cm9)) if lane is shared CR CR LOS LOS I MOVEMENT V(PCPH) CM(PCPH) CSH(PCPH) (CM -V) (CSH -V) CM CSH 7 33 59 187 26 43 E E I 9 4 111 80 531 187 420 43 A E II 212 132 D 1 \ 1 2 1 . SE I/4 SE 114 S C.; 1 - 1ON 12 i '2S M i W W.M. or 2S 1 I2DD \ \ 3�L ASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON ~ T 44s e' 1 SCALE 1 I00' N85 E 285 95' \ REMAINDER OF LOT 4 r 6 ` ) REMAINDER OF LOT 5 �/ 1U LOTTED ON MAP 2S 112DA TAX LOTTED ON MAP 2 1 12DA PI I C \ \ ,r 1 1 �.NCLL_UD TAX LOTS V ^+ 1 E ✓ 0 1 4400 10.., C! 11.1 I 4 2 6 A c y 0 0 AC e / : \ 3 O Y W V' 1 1 gi p, , _ STA 145 CO / of i c v : 1 \_., I II i 25 30 \ J J.r I ' ' aJ � Q ( .... „/ ,r ! 2 ® 1 ; . „.. ., `� ` m n' l..b�.! / a l''' a 1- ap 1RD 1 \ 1 65 1 ' 41 63 ti 0 a 1,- , 3p F� p b^ 4 _/ 9 E\ k' 1 200 O g r` / � 7 U v /� 1 252 Ac. _ v [, .0. � 9 p r p 6 13 v 263 45 S b Q ,00, a • N 0. a I 1 15 5 � aX ° r TRACT ` e 104 N 0 dd . £ 1 6 01 M - yl- 0- z ` / 45 Ac E s `i �j m ° D u� 3 - -' r • <1 2 °° .. w m O -5 � .k . . a .7 �. � s � g 5 �p .C .` AG' 0 STA 150 Z I S 9 ° A yh 6 d h \ r J o rr 60 /�� / ° � w Y F- i u¢ 6T7� 6.•: '' �� 1 6� ce _ w _ 110' Z 1. i. Z SEE MAP C _ . ( ' 800 ,o m o 2S I I2 D C Wu 5 �. �� � 1` ' Z ./8 AC ° \ U a N- R , o a a 800 -AI 12504 N ch o yam, \ S B N \ 1 3 to N r � r • 0 c ( �o f s BI °29 19 '' v PI cc -t\ n � . 1 4 c 7ao 900 U � o \ <1., A \\\2 J 4A„ /02 AC Q 1 T. y Q� a � � ( CS 10036) r `.i z \'c. >°' (CS 16010 ) N c Q . // �y - m I ,, ry po \ \ IN 01. T X \ -6'`l 232 59E \ G s \ / °� 1000 \ a CO ti) y o b h �ti s % \ ' - 76 AC 0 c ° ° 701 v Q s , \ \o9 ` ` o' 4 48 Ac s ;, �s J °s `ate • �. ` ° °'(CS 15762) ' o - � a� 55' / . \ O, *- \g/ • 15, ,, 66 ?S a\ 6 i F 1.r 9 Q 2 I 0 J \ S 8)° B . 49 ' E mow' G / 500 ? 159.40 � .< %,.) / N2 AC 0 C. _ Q 155 00 STA '0 CO (_,) 23 4..074 V``' e. pO �G P � O / �j 4. F: e9 , e 2 ,fl (CS 18294) 15180' ro 'C s s o� t 8o' v / 300 e�� h a s Cr i l . -1 X 0 67' • 7 8A C n os n. r^ �,) U n = 149 55 ” 1) (CS H021) N 4 m gt 0 209 85' 331 — — 12115 _ - 1 w FOR ASSESSMENT ! v "' N 89 38' E 1 �, PURPOSES ONLY tO � CO 400 J 1 3 WAS ; rtiNP R ELY ;�19N ;' 844c. f, ` 1 7 ?FOR ANY�OT R USE 1 584 1 S 89° 51' 10" W 331' pZ0.5 251,65' 24970' 200 120' 30' / ° pn (S W WASHINGTON ST VACATED 88-4 3086) VACATED VACATED 7 9 - 26467 79 16754 / v J 0 w 0 0 D A R r - P, J j i r i \ 13 18-7f q ii; ,r'i'-.3a,+Vr,• " }' ?['(eL { ^S I N 'n fn� SEE MAP 'p �° t N 'f / 2S 1 13A . 4 ,$) ',1' 1 ®, t TIGARD 1 1 2S I I2DD ION SAVED ON 10 PLOTTED 0N: I06/94 1021 5 on PC4 DRAWING FILENAME C. \ACAO \1269 \1269 PRE d 0 0311 ki 0.% 1 1 ®1 1 11 1 1 ® �' 22g� 1 ■ ®` - - - 224-- _. -.___ % - --. N. t ill* Scale 1" = 20' #`' 10 0 2 40 60 � ` ■ .® � ®,, N \ N \ ®' o �� \\ ` ,� ` , '` ■ ,® , ..-\ e ■ � .� \2 i8. \ � 1 - ® � 1® \� `� �1 \ l 1 ®� . \\ \\ \\ I : \ i e .. \ \ \\ \ \ 1: \ \ \, `\ 1 tw R � \ 1 \ i \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,\.) 1 \ J \ \ N / - / 1 \\ / 1 1 \ � „i \ ti / \ � r 1 ' � 1 j ' `'' / � 1 1 L -�” ' r \I 1 ► r 1 1 / i 1 / l / ® 1 . ► r r • 1 r 1 1 \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 �1 r / \----� r i - 1 � - -- 1 i 1 ;' O ry / � ti„91- / : r � / r 1 / 1 I � � �. 22 / r / / / 11/ 1 � � / / / / / 1 I j 1 ( 1 1 \ / 1 1 ' 1 ( 1 ) s / ■ 1 1 i i N / � °° ( 1 ��1 1 I • ` l 1 I \ \ \\ - ) 1 I I / / I / i' / \ i D I ,.." ,�;P , 1 3 : i \tit , lici „N.., / r ` el,. ® 1 1 IA Isii 1 1® 1 1 gc3 1 1 izza 1 1 ® 1 1® i I® 1 1 m 1 1® 1 1 1 1 sm it 1 ®1 1 ® 1 1 1 1 ® 1 1 1 1® 1 1 ® 1 1® 1 1 1 g UPPER BOONES FERRY BURGERVILLE PRE - DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP SUB -BASIN AREA CN 0 0.72 84 SAVED ON 15-4021 PLOTTED ON. 11/16/94 101742 on PC4 DRAWING FILENAME C \ACAD \I269 \I269DBSN 1 ,� li .,,,E, ---.,-, IV K.. .r '• ;el : Scale 1" = 20' ,. 1 tp , c,/ 10 0 20 40 60 .N N � \ I 1 • e* N v T 16 t A<,, °i�\ \\ `� 1t • ,; / / . 217 \\ a t 4 \ 2,. 1 / \ Vim\ . , \ 217 H l j � \'� • '\ g °I � \ N I I , 0 ,,,,, I , ) I■ - — v ai J III - nil ‘, I■ ( � I r ling 1 �l I■ 1 ■.■ ... ill 3 1 ■ ■ r 0 1 2 1 r PROPOSED 0 1 - itt �� BUILDING ■ 1 O IN /AN l i j ■1[16 ■1 I i A . El Ai !I 1 , // Il l Allifir „ ; Lii111 Ad I at I 1 i ( ,I� 1 , RI , it °e P,MiliheignlintiMEMAI 1 ' x.15' 1 1 I E._ 215 _... (// 441 1 i i ill Z , , , c MK /' I ti f i ••` / \ / et . UPPER BOONES FERRY BURGERVILLE POST-DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE BASIN MAP SUB -BASIN AREA CN 0 0.04 AC 98 0.03 86 O 0.32 AC 98 0.10 86 0 0.10 AC 98 O 0.11 AC 98 0.02 86 1 2 3 4 5 • I T T T T Tr 1 =— -_ - LANDSCAPING OR CONCRETE SLAB a SiD ° I L I - oo 1( PLANS SEE -- -r X + 6" SITE STATISTICS o . E j$6 CJ \ �► BUILDING + 2,703 SF 5/76- / A J X + &• —' 4' CONCRETE X + 6" � `'' WALK TRASH ENCLOSURE 200 SF ,. P6/ e 0 f Jo/ vii\ks I PAVING & WALKS + 15,511 SF LANDSCAPING + 5,493 SF (23z) OF fITY ii) > Q EXISTING CONCRETE ^^ in SITE = 23,907 SF (SS ACRES) 1- CONCRETE RAMP W/ W ALK ANQ CURB W J , A D TEXT O URED FINISH 0 4.-. W J Z flfl99 ca � �6/ a J Q . N + X 1/2" + NOTE Q` • •_• Q _ X 6" Cj X 8" ALSO SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN, GRADING PLAN, UTILITY PLAN, AND SITE / `� � ' � w w ----------- ----------- + 1/2" L 0 IGHTING PLAN / � l� 04, o Z o di ' z X + 6" ELEVATION X X + 6' o „, 2 cb ao � ` � 1/2” •:cr:: RADIUS �QQ • � I % = i DRIVE � ;11 ■ EXISTIN SIGN T 6 � VARIES SEE PLANS �6 USA \ i \ 2 � WALK RAMP • -. %� � � I = _ _ REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALTIC ' \ - CI 1 ll2 =1 0 WAL AND C, REPLACE W H CONCRETE WALK AND C URB / / EXISTING ASPHALT R C STANDARDS 3 ° - O �� PROPERT LIN ' QC ' E X I S TING 9 0 $' 0 NTS / A CCESSIBLE RAMP F EN CE PYLON >- , .1„.____ AT VAN SPACE PER CITY z� - - - STANDARDS ,� SIGN + e CC cv�z �2 W � / m gad . 25 0" R 33 0 R ACCESSIBLE SIGN <6 CESSIB ��::� �'�7\� �' ' g, il PER OREG6N STOP SIGN b STREET RA EE -���;, _ ,, , TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION STRIPING 25 0 R DET 2 ` f, fi` ,, � W/ V N PER CITY is �. ,3� -t � , ` 9 �'" AU STACKI Z Z A ACCESSIBLE S IGN UNDER �. - PERPENDICULAR MOUNTED ON 2 3/8" OD STANDARDS �;; j � I 1� R (TYPICAL) �•�;: � S DIAMOND SHAPED i, GALV STEEL POST - idit • •y w +t aci• �•• W ® (9 ASPHALTIC �„�' 5 ` '•:t' TEXTUREQ SUR } ACE ; 12O" ° DRIVE / f:' ; �' � ' \ l s= ,� m TYP i 8 h ( 9 in iii ctc 10fr, PAINTED SYMBOL ., �/�` ,>+ =_� ;10 1 ' 6' f Q OF ACCESSIBILITY , -� (j ~ ` CONCRETE CURB � � � '' , u L - j. � �X CLEARANCE j i3,3 1 , (fix { I w PER CI TY , ,..r 1 i15 ►� \�C GN �a l ! �- STAND�4RG5 : ' , , � - � 1� �' 1t t 60 0' 1 W ®- A i ce ' / � 'i i I ' ' ' �� - , , �� � ► 40,. t B t5 0 R i r . 1 2 SLOPE RAMP W/ 1 Z = i r r - , SLOPE FLARES \ � �a�� NON CONC SLI AB IENT y / + - 6 RETAIN WALL G .r SURFACE OVER � 150R LL_11�J (�1 a 111 L , SEEi 1 1 EXISTING CONCRETE 112/S3 �AT PLAY AREA PAINTED !�o� �+, zi �� i 6 1 3/63 DINING ow A ° E PARKING SPACE WALK AND CURB t , BACKGROUND ■ 780 SF L � M SEE DETAIL 3/1 N NEW EMI u, 2 4 1/2" 7' 0 ' E RAC . i M ACCESS AISLE 12' 0 X 10' 0 12' 0 / I f , t B URGERVILLE J N Z // — i r PAINT PARKING i N o m 4" WIDE PAINTED ; 1 A IF 1 � � � USA LiWe j YELLOW STRIPING (TYPICAL) 1 j N cn c 1 N T — t r. _ w 7 ELLOW STRIPE d / CO CR E w i 1 X 3 PT CEDAR ' EXPOSED AGG CONC f ' co m AT 2' 0" OC / WALK AND A ' CJ AT BLDG 0 / CURB I PERIMETER WALK st, SL AB W/ SEALANT ! _ ' - ONLY imsil ASPHALTIC PAVING r ° _ 4 4 1/2" ,— 5' 6 ` '�' 6 ' 4' QJ ' SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS I © ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE 5 2 1/2 j !11 CI 4 L EVA TIONS NT TO SCLE - O PACK, f Ii LA, 1 6 1 ' 10 6 0 ; 11 0 , 36' 0 • i 18' 11 ,(TYPICAL) I ` TOwAWAY ZONE' IGNS i+ = ¢ 3 1 ( 1 ) INGRESS SID (3) ; IT C RA MP ; j 0 1 c� Z z i EGRESS SIDE � l SEE f : 8 55 19 g . ; 1° r., a W W >- / ' I 1 12 n - ) i 2 6 " u _ PER FIRIE MARSHA ACCSSIBLE , �.�,'� ` ( . _ E X MONITOR wELL " - t, z $ FINAL LOCATION 'ER ,� DET 2/ 1 RA 111E••! � �i�■■�N 1 / ji 8 z 4 (TYPIC L) 1:1 1 f m - }- ' It4ti ® V CONCRETE CURB * ' EPLACE EXISTING , i - li w 45 0' 10' 0` R 15 0 ■ (TYPICAL) • � FENCE AS REQ i TYP NOTE SEE SHEET 13 k l - M ® � FOR SITE DETAILS •4 `��0 SEE 1 1 N IS6 W ALL 1 T � ASPHALTIC DRIVE � 2. ! -- �� EASEMENT , TRASH ENCLOSURE 1 m AREA S SHEET 2 r CONCRETE CURB �� 1 cm 111 c� EXTEND EAS BASE AS REQ 20' 0 20' 0 " PLACE CURB Z (� EXISTING ' EDGE OF NEW I SEE CIVIL DWGS °' ' ASPHALTIC ,l TIN I 1 „J o 0 BUILDING DRIVE ( _...._._.:_ _.. 1 0 • J • si DIRECTIONAL o O 8 z _ S 820 4 _ 00" n— EXISTING 1 2 W 125 03 - ' � -- w I ° A SPHALTIC / 1 1= i_ - ->- _ c - - - - SURFA / c Lt., rn , - - - i/ / w 1 z w ,I EXISTING PARKING N = I- Q ¢ CO REPLACE EX CURB , (13 FA — �,, r / PROPERY LINE AS REQUIRED � �� r RETAINING WALL r ___ 1 _ / SEE DET 11/S6 i . , 1 ------- --------, • r 1 SHEET N0. N J L ;% SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN r - 1 ' V, 1' =20'0' L i 1 1 _L A 1 i 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 r T T T T T // y j - FLOOR PLAN NOTES: © 7 O , , 0 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND STUB -UPS 70 8 WITH KITCHEN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. I 1 KITCHEN EQUIPMENT CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH ALL SUBCONTRACTORS WHOSE WORK TOUCHES OR IS I � 2' 0 16 0 " ,2' 0 " 25' 8 " 1 i AFFECTED BY HIS WORK. j f ! i O EXTEND ALL TOILET ROOM WALLS AND GYPSUM BOARD TO j 1 1 UNDERSIDE OF ROOF AND INSULATE WITH (R -11) - ALL TOILET ROOM WALLS. I , j OAT ALL EXTERIOR HOSE BIB LOCATIONS PROVIDE REMOVABLE \ `` PANEL AT WALL FOR MAINTENANCE. I iv ■ 2 ( TOILET ROOM WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH ANSI CODE 29' 4 " l 134' 0 , 5' 4 ,' 0 - . REQUIREMENTS FOR THE HANDICAP 1 1 } > z o O PROVIDE SOLID BACKING FOR ALL EQUIPMENT. VERIFY I I 1 -J Q is? LOCATIONS WITH KITCHEN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER. 4' 4' 1 18'7" 4' j -' A (1) PROVIDE WALL ACCESS PANEL (FOR PRIMER VALVES) 1 j V 4.4 o LIJ Q - ■ 14 "X14" STAINLESS STEEL PANEL PROVIDE LETTERING ON 1 . 1 .0. - J NI PANEL "PRIMER VALVES" 1 1 I O 7 PROVIDE PLYWOOD IN LIEU OF GYPSUM BOARD UNDER ( .' i 1 j :E w w DRIVE -UP WINDOW BY WIDTH OF WINDOW MINIMUM. SEE I 1 � - ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR FINISH OVER PLYWOOD. 0 • 1 j I 1... , Z o CU Ca ' z T VERIFY FIRE EXT. CABINET LOCATIONS WITH FIRE MARSHALL. LINE OF I ^ 1 I I - Q PROVIDE 2X4'S AT 16' 0 C. WITH GYPSUM BOARD EACH SIDE. OVERHANG I 1 I o 10 RECESSED PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER. MOUNT BOTTOM OF L 1 j I UNIT 9" A F.F. PER A D.A. 1 � IA l • HOSE PROJECT MAX. 4" FROM WALL PER A.D A. I I BIB ® PROVIDE 2X BLOCKING IN WALL BEHIND ICE MACHINE TO S DRAWINGS OTHERS - SEE K E __,- 1 0 - ( S ECURE WATER FILTER LOCATE AT 70 A.F F DIRECTLY I -- 1 �"" �""""""""""" - - 1 I :'D -S• I . U BELOW WATER SUPPLY. I j GAS CO UNTER SA i N 12 FUR WALLS WITH P T. 2X4'S FLAT AT 24" 0 C. � � 1 I 'CO TANK METER 7 ■ DS 4. ` I - K . E . S . D RIVE -UP A i -- — O 13 BABY CHANGING STATION PROVIDE 1 j K.E.S. N �� .- -- BLOCKING FOR MOUNTING 5' 8" AFF B - -- ---•-- - - --- - FRAME HEADER- 7 1 1 [1 II 11 0 ------ - -- --- TO 7'- 0 " AFF 1 _-- _--- _- _-- _._I_.__- _ -.o. - B I-- IN MEN'S 5' 6" AFF IN WOMEN'S. ' �� �I� � ` ������� �� _ ������������►�'������ ` ����� - - - - - r r.����r�lr.� «.�����..�.���� �r�����.���...�.�. 0 I D.S��C - ODA RACK ' 0 I ____1._ ____1._ 1 O 1 K. E S. / 1 I 1 1 I BY K E S. j' Ih- - LOW WALL 1 �-� - , L 14 TOILET 00 ROM PERPENDICULAR PWALLAFF, I ` 1 1 1 _ _ _ _ _ 1 1 -- O ❑❑ - I 3' -5' H F.D. - - • PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED. 1 ` I 111111 1 1 1 1 I = II 1 ` FREEZER 1 BEVERAGE • - O O 1 in TOILET SEAT DISPENSER. PROVIDE REQUIRED ` / COOKING EQUIPMENT 1 I F S �, F S COUNTER I v c CZ 6 Ti __l Y K.E.S. I W 8,5 TAL STUD WALL - 1 MACHINE �-�- I ` l X„./F-S B HIND COOKING EQUIPMENT I 1 K I ' 16 TOILET ROOM FIXTURES, ACCESSORIES, LAYOUT I X K ITCHEN 1 I 6' -6" H O 1 ( � ALL ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS AND CLEARANCES TO COMPLY WITH I ` Z / PREP F S. LOW WALL I .. ;� I W 1 STORAGE � _ 4 I 1 1 I � _ �, Z I ` ( 9 I ! I � � $ � . 1 I READER Q II p Z rn 1 ' - 1 BOARD , J • • :: _ 7 3 i �/ \1., I - - 1 �SEEVE c�c� I cv I ' ( 9 ' t I I I t �✓ al v N 1 . STALE I METAL ® 11 S 1 TAB 1 I 1 1 1 ® -- 1 LADDER 3 1 W p _> ir, -...: m \ , i ' , 1 SI � I / Y K - 1 I I -- ®i. t 1 . $ 1 ® / y 1 ' COOLER - �� – � 1 sALEIS WAITING 3' -10• H 2 1 cn I �l �1 I 5 1 r 1 1 C�Uf�TER 2 LOW WALL 1 1 Q I `� �) 1 1 11 E.S _ • +� 1 ` ,� � j' � 1, 1 1 ` O g I 0 - , • I 11 1 in - - MI 3' -0' WIDE i m I- cr , 1 1 1 - 1 �� _ L _ 0 I 1 SECT OF COUNTER 1 "' _ `r, ill BC FIRE 1 1 - AT ACCESSIBLE 1 1 `� Q LOCKERS COMBUSTION AIR EXTINGUISHER 1 SALES r -- HEIGHT OF 3' -0" DINING 1 DUCT SEE 1/M4 13 I AFF MAX - 1 BY OWNER O i 1__ 1 1 z tii I `/ ICE MACHINE K.E S. 2' 4 ' S' 6 1/ 2" 3 1/21 - i o N - HAND ¶ . I 1 • 1 w , ss ,• , (., SINK 1 I 1 i4 1 y m 1 `1 r �.s- �si����E:i�i�� S ri+ �. imi�s���� - - * PI ' - 1 - SEATING AND LAYOUT BY w ` ,, -,t. �I 1^ - A t0 I� I c i _ '' . I 1 N I r V.�► .I CI 1 ► O I r -, C I I ,� , ► r I COUNTER 1 p 2' 0 O u� I MIN ire Jr _� 2 ; I� I r �1 I I I BY K.E S. I 1 11, iv, a ' ',_=__=� /4 — 1 I — 11 1 1 j 7•®► 61� 1 1 I -IJ -- - - - I ll ! , 11111 , 111 1 �� �� ice■ -- - -I ! J �� r CI 1 F-- '-� i` � � I y �"�� " " "� Q SI GN ON DOOR FRAME 3 ij �1 —~ 1 �' 1 T N O F F I C EI / 1 Z Z I� , TO READ "THIS DOOR D W o W �= 1 , LOW WALL �.,; - 1- D _ - T ' $i„ cfl AC) FIRE TO REMAIN UNLOCKED = 1 y J �' III 67-- ` � �, I EXTINGUISHER ® r �_ I-910 � © y I c ,, DURING BUSINESS HOURS" I � u- t , Z a LA I, 1 \ _ / \� I II I o \ "" "'""" ' t�l�......w....►���...... ��.. x........46 %.... •., �; c - c, z .1 ; 1 1 1 1 i 1 ` . I� 1 MEN / f , 10" I if, r € F ;!j = tilE ► � @ I I II' 1 R ' SERVICE zv I SINK 1 °O 1 T YP . 8' 2 - 4 1/2" 3. 6 .. � `LOW WALL LOW WALL I 3 1/2" m 3 1/2' 3 1/2" I ! ; {, TOWEL -/A 111 HALL O 1 !iii I ` WASHER _ ® I II!l D.S��Ic i - - _ �- D.S. 1 o I m , - -- "`��""„"""""1 i , i ��"1 "" II �J — 1 � ----- - -I- -- N +-- I;I I Il I j HOSE c4 BO AO j 1 Z c DRYER VENT $1$ 1 I I WALL CAP `° I ' I , 1 I SEE MECH j 1 1 j SHT. M4 1 ! ' I �- I j _ „ ■ J I h p 1 r- ,,-. c s 1 w E 1- 1 iv \ \\--\\ D.S. ( to L.I._ o LINE OF 1 OVERHANG 1 ( I 1 I 'WALL LEGEND _ - -- _ _ ' I j 1 I 3 1 /2- 5 1/2" j �� CONCRETE BLOCK j 6' t 1 • 5' 9 a . •, ., SHEET NO I T 2 0, 16 0 , 2 0 , �j WOOD FRAME I 0 I METAL STUDS ___ 22' 0 " 13' 4 " 4' 0 " 12' 0 4' 0 13' 4 ,2' 0 " 1 1 COOLER /FREEZER BOXES 3 1 1 , . 70'8" -- ____ j <rep 17Th' FLOOR PLAN III 1 ) 3 4 , 1 • PR6L I M INARY 4 11 SUBJECT TO AGENCY REVIEW NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ' 4 D OF F Ss PR GENERAL tIOTE$i / / 4j?? 1 4 -411 q .9 �. \ Y ,° \ Topographic information provided by Burton Engineering, Inc , Tigard, OR. C ) Additional protective measures, as required due to job site conditions. ' ) 1 — 4 _ _ 1 \ \ \ Site plan provided by Architects Associative, Vancouver, WA. D.) Monitoring of vehicles leaving the site to minimize transmission of loose soils to C A s i p RE N 0� m \ \ EXTG CAST -IN -PLACE CURB TO REMAIN the public roadways. �/ r 25 , , g .° � Prior to any excavation or site work, the contractor shall call 639-4171 for location -1/1/ -1/1/ E N OQ \ � �, \ REMOVE EXTG ASSIDEWALK PHALTIC SIDEWALK markup of existing uti thoroughly utilities. E ) If sediment is transported onto a road surface the surface is to be cleaned NEW 9 Y at the end of ea . da Y °, ' \ \ EXTG TRAFFI All water system and sanitary sewer construction, materials and workmanship occur�ng „% \ \ SIGNAL BOX \ \ onsite, past the property line shall conform to the latest standards and practices of the Material stockpiles are to be protected from precipitation by the following means. 1 \ . \ City of Tigard Building Department. I EXTG STREET EXTG TRAFFIC Temporary •cover piles with tarps or plastic sheeting weighted with tires, lumber LIGHT BOX SIGNAL POLE All additional construction, demolition, materials and workmanship shall conform to the or concrete blocks. , a k. \ latest standards and practices of the City of Tigard, Washington County, and the ♦♦,,pp�� A♦ w , ,, , , , , , , , , \ >� „\ ` Oregon Department of Transportation. Permanent - cover piles with tarps or plastic or reseed. Perimeter areas around v/� �V > o ��a ,. * $ -- -- -- -- piles ae to be surrouned with erosion control filter fabric fences until soil �"s > i-- Z a P surfa is s tabilized with reseeding �� :� w z w v ` — % DEMOLITION NOTES z 11 m '° \cl°1 EXTG LIG HTING\ yrPr o = A. n 0 °� � \ JU NCT ION BOX \ y - --' �'�i \ M existing utility fines under the abandoned or proposed building shall b either SITE GRADING — Q d m m GP - \ relocated or capped off and abandoned per city building department requirements. w w m m \ \ a c • \ 0: / -• I ' � \ Pri or to commencement of the grading operation the contractor shall read and < - a'3 W g ; & N ��\ \ �� I /� \ To pr ovide a clean edge for construction, sawcut existing pavement 2' from the implement erosion contrpl measures outlined and shown on the plans. _ ,1 w w o Q a C EXTG TRAFFIC - - - _ I,♦� EXTG IGNS gutte rtine during installation of curbs within the public right -of -way 0 > R" 2 ; F 4 \ JUNCTION BOX / �� T site shall be cleared and grubbed as necessary prior to site grading. AN L. z o o ��° ' � \ G � '� \ - / -' M pavement, concrete and other deleterious materials generated from site demolition deleterious materials shall be hauled from the site to a contractor provided waste site m z x �a \v \ / shall be hauled to a contactor p rovided waste site. a z °�� OQ E TRAFFIC p ' . "" 223 ' Exposed subgrade soils in areas to receive structural fill should be scarified to a depth — > U ilk v \ SIGNAL BOX \ ! \ o EROSION CONTROL MEASURES of 8 inches and recompacted to 95% of maximum relative density. ' \ ` MEET a MATCH FG 2 \ � AA subgrad u p surfaces, curbs buddin footin slabs `\ Q \EXTG CURB , " - -- - 2 � r Do not disturb more area than needed for construction requirements. walkways shalt ba compac to 95% of maximum relative densit Where and concrete filling is 11 /' \ V \ required, t he fill material shall be placed in 8 Irfts, with each hft to ,° a5o i� 3° Earthwork shall not be performed during periods of precipitation, and shall not continua 95% of maximum ret density of the fill mat erial before the next lift being or finish surfaces compacted .''�,,, \ ma c . �° �` > �,,, 2� MFG 2 \ �_ EXTG FENCE again until the soils are stable enough to minimize erosion and sedimentation. are placed. Where filling is required out side the above mentioned structural areas, \ \ \ ,�- / / ` 22 0 TO REMAIN compaction requirements shall be 85% of maximum relative density. Compaction \ \ / / o All disturbed sort surfaces are to be stabilized. Sfabilization of disturbed soil areas will testing shall be in accordance with AASHTO T -180. \ , \ NEW CURB 8 SIDEWALK � '� ��': ' / 2\1 20 ere �,o �, consist of hydroseeding or handseeding, mulching, placing of erosion control blankets Q -" G 2 \ � Any excess material, not required to complete the grading shown on the plans shall be 2\ \ o r p lastic in landscapin soil areas It will also consist of paving and concrete work in \ c, \ / , � � 10 �° -.______ hauled from the site to a contractor provided waste site. \ `� E XTG 12" WATER � ' Z \8 2 G 2 \ � - driving, parking and sidewalk areas. AI! seeded areas are to be fertilized, watered and n p — \ \ % F Z ia maintained to enhance the immediate growth of vegetation. Alt Surfaces shall be graded smooth and free of irregularities that might accumulate V �J [� n c, / N • p,0 217 surface water. o j � G L \6 \6 0 °o The contractor shall be responsible for policing the job site and maintaining erosion \ \ SEE RETAINING WALL / ti �I E G 2 1 \ , \ 2 22 = p �� G 2\ \ 2\ 5° control measures throughout all phases of construction. The policing and maintenance >— shall include but not be limited to: \ sRADING DETAIL \ k 0 / 2 \ 6N0 F 2 \ 610 1 '` EG \ ° � \ ° FG A) New and existing catch basins and storm inlets are protected from siltation z SILT a a RETAINING WALL thcough the use of straw bales or other sedimentation traps Ltil W \ REMOVE EXTG y,. / - RR LIMITS � - t— CURB \ p� '', I t - ' � C9 \ � G A - I _ r 16 1 B) Removal of trapped sifts at silt barriers, silt traps, and other points of , ao � �� " ;- ' ^- T 2\6 P' ,-9, EXTG EXTG PP 8 TEL RISER accumulation W 6 \ f — . i 1 . _ < — ��c -+* o — TO BE RELOCATED EXTG TRAFFIC w %/ �; i�� �"= `� 22 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH W Ch rp i ' . 1 . -- SIGNAL BOX TO ,', 1' ; l 2 \5 , 1 F� ' — - - -f F G 2 6 UTILITY PROVIDER PRIOR TO INLET SILT BE RELOCATED L � j wl ; �� r - ZG �G 2 RELOCATION. O �o BARRIER / '� / i a l ; 1._ 1' i r I ` 4 DRA NREA 2 \6 ° � i'1 �- G 2\ 90 CI) \ \ f \ EXTG STM �, 3 ( t F G / F I I Q m ■ INLET; 1 I i 1 o. oc EXTG STORM \ � N \ 1 INLET , ,, ` . 1 / xl W; x I � r `� FG ' 1 ' ' ' ( w w ) i LL1 W — '' -' f 1 i II I i, 1 ) . '. PROPOSED 'I / 1 f--- , .' p..,, ��� i 1 1 • ' ROPOSED BLD T � _ ' FINISHED _ ' F ,- il I o v `'\� � CONC } 1 i + ! G 2 \51 FF 216.0' CONTOUR TYP �.�' V AULT 1 1 l I( 11 2 \6`' lil`I I Q ' / I E XTG 12" WATER ; I EXTG ELECTRICA 1 i 111 I �I .\c ,' _ , i RISER 1� 1 ` C/� (1) w 1 5 ! EXTG GAS ' � r NEW CONCRETE g° I — " y o � 00 — h i � CURB w 1 I G 2 \°` r� `\ 1 -- I _ �6 � I � � EXTG MONITORING I ; ' I i EXTG 8" WATER _ _ • 6 2 \ �. I; I— F WELL ITYPI / 7/---- — _ / � P � ! i ., 0 EXTG STM OW w it / 2\ r l ! � .\ , - \� e \2 6 o \ a \ \-\ TO BE BACKFILLED FG \ \° 1 - o° r \ .cP \6\ l 2 ( o° 2\� 0 1 ° A 2 12" AREA DRAIN ii i �� i \ 6 GRATE E I � c � L 2 5.80 F 0 , ' y:� - � REMOVE EXTG 01E11 1 1 1 i i -- _ P�� o z ,` �.�' G R A p,0 !' 1 i 2 2 2 ° 6 � F ° O CATCH BASIN / �� \����� `T� > 2\, o i c� 2 ` 6 RE MOVE — — — — EXTG MONITORING — r-- 1 : : 0 `�� 1 6° 0 CIP 2 \`' d�� ; ' ( FG EXTG CB 1 /i i . .` WE - t— .4 � l i I 1F 7) 2\`' i URBING c- 15 "4 - .. w EXTG STM DW (� ' • o° . CO a 1 o 1 i:��i�• o o •• � e 'i; � : 2i5 �2 �g° •C, TO BE BACKFILLED ii cc" - r e D — . w x 1 I 11 / 0. INLET SIL — — _ T u \ °� w z - z r 1 w 50 / ° o BARRIER \ 6 ENTRANCEWAY VEHICLE = 0 6 . -------\ ° a ° z ° 0 A H OWN 1 l 2 \ 6 ° EXTR y ED 2• CIP CURB ° 1 _ ' 2° ° 3 1 � � Q = - = -, Z W S D ZON i C U' :ING F G G 2\6 2 \6 , 2 2 \6 6 } � U o 3 a o N I . l (, `L 0 z tx z Q o 1 ► F RETAINING WALLF X3 2\ i FG 2 z ° z w o I I �i �: �i ti JINNI :ii ii►i:' F G LIMITS OF NEW 1 1- - - • AC SURFACING �' • • • • • ` _; EXTG CONTOUR x 1 . >- o a o 1 a Li_ 1. i • • r ' - �± _ - ITYP) w ( oc � z IQ ' IF MEET a MATCH , i 2 \ I o N I > 6 �' - • / 1 ° C EXTG AC EX TG SHERWOOD F F 2 \ . / 2 \6 0 r o i 1 _ _ w INN BILLBOARD FG F ;° o �- co / SEE ARCHITECTURAL 8 I 1 , . j 2> 6 STRUCTURAL PLANS ' ° ti NEW SIDEWALK ti \ , N �� 1 J �w z t ° FOR TRASH ENCLOSURE WALL ! I 1 1 - I ( v if) Q w �,1 z w�T O c in U , 1 i n O -.44, /I Q - LEI W J GRADING LEGEND _o y �P�� — I- 013 0 . iii N (0 — P�� \ � G ,� : Z O O - TC: TOP OF CAST -IN -PLACE CURB P �� �� 5 \6 ? l J w z o') FG: FINISHED PAV'T OR CONCRETE ELEVATION .,`� w QZ a I— co o TW: TOP OF WALL ELEVATION f = tY O v Q O , ' (./1 U O (..n 0 —, _ RETAINING WALL GRADING DETAIL 1 if 0 U 1 SCALE: I " =10' � a n , // \\ oN SHEET NO. 4' 2 M n r' Q N U ,ri a d 0 , 0l 0 „, Scale 1” = 20' C 1 - - a 20 10 0 20 40 80 N w t - toZJ 1 1 1 ' 1 —1 0 0 0 w z 0 1- - uJI- -3 - >oa caiia� \ tI 6 1 I ' PFREL I M I NARY SUBJECT TO AGENCY REVIEW NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION p PROFESS �� G INE <v 11,35 " A rt &4,7 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION NOTES _ t1 /S' 9 _ . The location ,p (e)01. 3 RE ON ,. t►on of the roof drain within the I 0 building limit is schematic, final location shall be 9 coordinated with the architect's roof plan. Roof drain line is to be install �/ 25 , \ P installed to within 2 feet of the building perimeter. /4/ N •3Q E. Roof drains shall be ASTM 0 3034 PVC sewer pipe or smooth interior high density polyethylene pipe CADS N -12'). Slope shall be 0 01 ft/If unless otherwise noted ��\\�` 1 / _ Materials for storm sewer piping shall be smooth interior corrugated high density polyethylene (`ADS N -121, ASTM 0 3034 PVC or ASTM C -14 plain concrete sewer - pipe, class 3. co , °% w w . , , , Storm inlets shall be fitted with an approved trap, per the details. o z r EXTG TRAFFIC > Z a SIGNAL POLE Pipe bedding material shall be select native material except where saturated or ground • ® z m . m W W . m m water conditions are encountered, then gravel backfiltl shall be used. = y 1 , , EXTG TRAFFIC •® ° A d < m m < .... . ,- SIGNAL BOX L3aclu`lll shad be select native material. BackflH shaft b c ompacted to 95% of the w �3 y m maximum relative dense . '" _ y ; ° N Q EXTG STREET _ W z LIGHT BOX J ' , 1.1.4 p, w SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION NOTES • > N 9 w .i W V > F Fn ;� a zo O Coordinate sanitary sewer connection location and elevation with the 3 . . . x EX TRAFFIC .X 1 architecturaVmechanical building plans. Extend pipes to within 2 f ee t o t budding a 5 . . z SIGNS perimeter. , o - co u , i P �i i Sanitary sewer laterals shall be ASTM D 3034 PVC sewer pipe . , SERVICE FROM MAIN .. • ' • G.' , . , 2" METER & S rat ro n �� I1 G . ' i Pi Pipe beddin material shall be select native material, except where sate ed or g u d 11/� SET BY CITY FORCES r �.- -- ' i . water co are encountered, then gravel backfltl shalt be used. • EXTG TRAFFIC sr�� ,�� • i - -‘4,0,,,,, - ,/ 1 Contractor is responsible for recording as -built informaiton of the sanitary lateral SIGNAL BOX i %' G 6i i �� WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES ) I" NATURAL GAS CONNECTION �� i / 1 DESIGN a CO NSTRUCTION OF �s`y Q LINE BY NW NATURAL GAS Coordinate potable water line connection Location and elevation with the _ _ Q / architectural/mechanical building plans. Extend pipes to within 2 feet of the building — 0 --- �� i ' EXTG LIGHTING perimeter. CD EXTG WATER BO , s , ®�, -' J WITHOUT METER �;- `, -- JUNCTION BOX 1 Portable water tine shall be ASTM D 1785 PVC water pipe, schedule 40. �-j TO BE ABANDONED j. -___�� ��� EXTG TRAFFIC O 1 STORM OUTLET - i i �/ JUNCTION BOX 8ackf111 for water trenches shat! be select native material Backfdl matenat shat be j . - � -r' / EG F 8, compacted to 95% of the maximum relaUvedensity o• Ir W z Q, SEE DETAIL Pi_ Y VALVE XT H ASS'Y O • Il l_i_ �/ BAC Kt =LO PR OTECTION LLij 1.1y)-. Q EXTG SAN CO . A ±fT!;!f:;: d by the Oregon State Health De partment Is permFt from the Clty of Tigard. • I z i 1 O J FLAT 30" STM SP �� pO a M ETER Alt '`� i i 2 ( ik ' O \ P 9 _ / CONTRACTOR TO EXTG SAN MH 28 LF 4" SAN LAT - A G \E # COORDINATE WITH , 0 0 ROTATE MH CONE S =0. '' '' t), I AS REQUIRED THE CITY OF A m 02 FT /LF �� � `" I J t. TIGARD PRIOR Q EXTG TRAFFIC SIGNAL I\,F' P ik.' �5L•: -i'�- �'' f � - TO RELOCATI•N ' 0 BOX TO 8E RELOCATED F� `'' l ' y - I T ' , i I Er W 01 6, ( . /BD. --�- • • - . c . 4,---._ — I— S' �'I; % a 0_ CONNECT 12" STORM ,� 1 ' 1 :',� 1 �'7� 4" .RD S_O.OF' MIN I — - 1, S Q -i 1 ' I • - - '_ - `L' - ` • LINE TO EXTG , '' 6 , i` _ i 1 t V4 SAN CO �`- STORM INLET S� �. 3 1 w I > I I , TOP EL 2!5.80 STM CO EXTG PP 8 TEL RISER iir ` , 1 \2 T I I • II` i . II _ ;r i i p U) \ \ \ - � I � I O ' TOP 215.80 �J 4' IE 212 = �__ -_,1 � w I cn; ~ 11 I 30" IE 208.80 f w (�� 1 EXTG FH al y I �, w i -; 85 LF 30 STM SP �rx . p� I �; FLAT - _ - �- ' ' k I w EXTG WATER VALVE '' �c,P�� x I f 73 LF 4" SANITARY v) , 0 / w; I ' I 3 LATERAL L • OFTFAE��E' , ' EX T G 6" WATER RELOCATE EXTG . '� � G EXTG CONC VAULT I I I �I 7' S =0 02 FT /LT r''` = �:,,,,,,,:7i ' ' ��' I FH B EHIND SIDEWALK O cn / ' a W ll PROPOSED BLDG 2 . _ _� l EXTG GAS VALVE . EXTG ELECTRICAL M1 j FF 216.0' `� ` - ;� I i' / v RISER I f • m il (/) EXTG STORM INLET w I ; � 2' j _ EXTG 12" WATER %i , � � � RELOCATE EXTG 2" 1 ; / j 4" IE 213.20 EXTG MONITORING \ ` WATER METER BEHIND w ;1 _' WELL (TYP) > EX TG GAS / i i SIDEWALK , • I. I ( 4" SAN CO = I SE�PRf>T�CTIVE �� - f 1 ` EXTG 6 STM SP f_ -_ I DS (TYPI BOX DETAIL I 1 EXTG 8" WATER � �� i� _ 1- l l - -- _ ' L � W z L. z 1- } I , r -•► ,I. i,, I _ _ ^ _ li - 1 1 ' r � / V P U z a z ° ,__, 1 = J 65 LF 8 ` STM SP S =0 04 / D, �. w o w E u p 1 / N \ ' 1 -- WI,' / a �- O Q O w a a� 1 , � 1 ; 1 �' Nz ►-v, w (..) 1 ,,....)„ ow 1 1 EXTG CATCH H BASIN— -___ — - i L_____ � t w a 03 0 a Z Lid I TO BE ABANDONED CATCH BASIN W /TRAP - EXTG WATER VALVE 1 I ; ` I F E XTG STM DW - -_� ivI GRATE EL 214.40 EXTG 2" WATER METER x ° 1 TO BE BACKFILLED EXTG 6" WATER �;~ ,� o Q 8 m Z 1 " IE 212.70 ( LI -- -- - — NEW 2 SERVICE Q x " i � a cii w 1 • • • • z • LA • EXTG GAS 15.5' I 0 U I I ► cn Q w TRENCH DRAIN o o U I LIMITS OF NEW 1 EXTG SHERWOOD INN REMOVE EXTG CB 17 LF AC SURFACING BILLBOARD EXTG STM DW 1.5' MIN w Z o �fi . TO BE BACKFILLED w Q j 1 _ N o , NEW SIDEWALK F - - • N UTILITY LEGEND 4 " VERTICAL OUTLET W J J L o Q N tii CO: CLEAN OUT CONNECT TO STM MH = H U Q 0 C DS. DOWN SPOUT _ ° -' _ DW S ER DR W LL WATER LINE RELOCATION DETAIL II FH: N SCALE: 1" =I0' o RD. ROOF DRAIN U 11 0 N 0- j oN SHEET NO. O o r-a 1 1- Q — w — — z Scale 1" = 20' • w C 2 z o L 20 1 0 0 20 40 60 000 1 1 1 • , 1 w z Lii_ >oa Q J CC 1 N d 0 R t i 1 , 1 t 28 1/4 24" DIA COVER I / y 1 . \ RED PROpF a FRAME 0Op4 (5 \'‘ G 1 NE <0 C � F , 4 , TOP ELEV 213.50 w t 1 , 3 0000 o000 / 0004 TYPE BP MANHOLE (FLAT TOP) 0000 _ �� . • • v. 46 " ID W /LADDER N °° — �� 1:� - ---- oo�� 91- III L A., 27 3/4" �\ GRATE Qf Fp s ARE ON 9 i. - 1 • ° a 10 GAUGE THICKNESS � t \ < v a . a CAST IRON /1 N E 5' NOQ SLOPE VARIES SECTION A -A EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 1 i,��17���i�iAI OUTLET EL 211.60 - GRATE TO SET IN _J 1 ,, ' / %// ' • BELL RECESS i i , STAINLESS STEEL STRAP FASTENED TO WALL USING 4 G����� A l A z 0.20' ASPHALT CONCRETE PAV'T, ODOT CLASS C 1 I WATER SEAL TRAP ° a ANCHOR BOLTS (TYP) �� J m 0.50' MIN COMP DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 3 REQ'D ° �_ ° - .� w z W g ' 2.4" DIA ORIFICE �, j OUTLET II c=n :S: a ; COMPA TED SUBGRADE 95% NON SHRINK GROUT TYP EL 208 90 C Q H=mm 12 "X6" CONCENTRIC - r W 0 ; PAVEMENT SECTION TYP R EDUCER - N 0 w a N 9 NTS \,_\_ k / T _ \1� _ _ 4 MIN D O \ 30" IE 208 80 12" STM SP 111 '' ai co m Q cn � > z i ` i.l CONCRETE SECTION / 24" SQ ,n °v oo PVC NIPPLE F • W/#4 STEEL ROD Will °a ° ° 4 • REINFORCEMENT � 1 • II 6" IE 208.00 6" O.C. a REMOVABLE END CAP 6 "X6" PVC TEE c W/NEOPRENE GASKET CATCH BASIN DETAIL STORM OUTLET CONTROL MANHOLE NTS < NTS 12" NOMINAL — — DIA Cn WWF 6x6x10 STRAWBALES / CC SLOPE VARIES 1. ` 1�.=t�� . V / �t_� A. ! • ` ♦ ° �� [ ` .1 - i /, /:/ \/" 1 // / /2 FLOW - "A 1 ' : : r : FLOW °` / / / / / � , 1,57 GEOTEXTILE 111 Q • \- \ \ . , \ ; EROSION CONTROL , - V- 0.50' CEMENT CONCRETE SLOTTED GRATE \ \/ "' `' 1 7.1.... FILTER FABRIC ■ 1 1 W a.-• BSS CONCRETE PIPE SECTION 1 EROSION CONTROL 0.30' MIN COMP DEPTH GRANULAR SURFACING BASE COURSE f ASTM C 14 STRAWBALES FILTER FABRIC W COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95% J a i Id I - TYPICAL LANDSCAPE- TYPICAL • ' z APPROVED REMOVABLE TRAP OR ROUGH GRADE ' AC PAVEMENT Q A.C. PAV'T OR CONCRETE z ° Y - i REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB SECTION 4" • MIN • ; li. / /i. / //. / / / \ /, 'o 1 1 Q m 4 N \ 'i _J \ \ \ '.\ \,' •,' ' fr :TN / Q FOR CONCRETE DRIVE PAD 4 a MIN � ° CRUSHED SURFACING U SE R � BASE CC NW A ILL 0 _ NTS TYP BOTH SIDES , •4 a W R AP GRATE a • W /GEOTEXTILE w H / . / / / - - /• -, a '', /" / !. /.;, EROSION CONTROL 1 u ��� �_ \ /� \ / � / \ \ /�\ a t�// < / / \ \ ' / FILTER FABRIC t� )) a 4" MIN CONCRETE CLASS B �� �� , ',z4. _ a a \ \� CATCH BASIN O DRAIN SHALL BE /� / /�� / ` (• :, \ / ` / ` / / / / / / / /�� / �� \\ POLYDRAIN, INC. NOTE: WITH WIRE E OR T NYLON BOUND \ \\''� / �\��� �� % % % / /i� /i \ /� \ \ / NO 010 OR TYPICAL CATCH BASIN M APPROVED EQUIV 12 AREA DRAIN DETAIL INLET SILT BARRIER rra . CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 PSI NTS NTS MIN IN 28 DAYS, 2" TO 4" SLUMP TRENCH DRAIN SECTION ' mIA " Al NTS / / / \// / BACKUP SUPPORT DEPENDING ON THE PROPERTIES z OF THE SELECTED GEOTEXTILE INSTALL GEOTEXTILE USE "POLY FELT TS -500" O TIMBER OR STEEL POSTS, "POLY FELT TS-700" "EXXON GTF -101" > 0.33' CEMENT CONCRETE AS REQUIRED BY SPECIAL OR PROJECT APPROVED w PROVISIONS, SPACED AT A M CC AXIMUM 6' CENTER TO EQUAL (W.D.O.T. ACCEPTED 0.20 MIN COMP DEPTH GRANULAR SURFACING BASE COURSE WELL PROTECTION BOX CENTER MATERIAL REQUIRED) COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95% CAST IRON NEENAH R -1976 OR EQUIV STAPLES,WIRE, — HOG RINGS, ETC III TRENCH FOR ANCHORING GEOTEXTILE w 0 c� 0 0 8 P R I V A T E SIDEWALK SECTION (TYP) TC EL 6„ 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK _ _ _ OPTIONAL ! I I (BACKHLL TAMPED IN TRENCH) 5 o OR LANDSCAPING SUPPO III FLOW z a z < cr T r POST 1 11 o ° � 1 NTS / ► `��\ \�\ / 1 --- z z w " R I /2 "R -- , / _/ r \,\ \ < .\\ >- 0 -_, 0 w a ASPHALT a a ° '� j '�?�,•��` /�\ - m \1 ✓ 1 6 • MIN - 5 a a' w SURFACE ° ° NEW AC PAV'T r � , i / \ w a o - Z = a c° OR CONCRETE '\\,`\\ > m 0 F v"i ° • - _ \ \/ , 10" DIA / � a ? \ / /, —^; / UNDISTURBED SOIL DISTURBED SOIL / / / / (.11 i' ri �. ° 8 j � EROSION CONTROL co i Z ii j a \ \/ t ' FILTER FABRIC FENCE / \j \ \ j \ \ j\/ III ° / \ t- Z /I// / / , / / \ / \ \ / / \ / \\ A it • ° j 0 0 NTS J Z • \' \ / \ / \�\ cn Qw EXTRUDED CEMENT \' /\/\/\ \ //� / w w _ ci CONC. CURB r______5 8 ADJUST HEIGHT OF WELL Z (/) • FG EL CASING 8 SANITARY CAP ROCK BERM AT EXIT W P A A 1 NOTE. IN ACCORDANCE WITH (L CE T HGH POIN OF J W Q Cn : E NTRANCEWAY APRON — — Ai A DEQ WATER RESOURCE ) }- Z (.0 6" DEP RULES OAR \ EXTG MONITORING 24" 6" MIN a z •• N I I. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 PSI MIN. IN 28 DAYS, 2" TO 4" SLUMP. WELL • ACE J = O 4 690- 240 -005 THROUGH MIN i J w z 0) 2 CURBS ADJ ACENT TO PAVEMENT OR SIDEWALK TO HAVE EXPANSION 6 240 -180 ` - 7�� , w U _J w • �•� +_ ' `-�; CRUSHED ROCK �ii1 � \ _ / U < O GO I�-� ---� PAVEMEN AND /OR CONTRACTION JOINTS TO MATCH EXISTING PATTERNS. )� : � .,_ ��� �. - V) � N Q � _ SECTION ,� / ,,\, \,\ \, \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \ // a ca O O °ate ° O 3 3/8" EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT 45' MAXIMUM SPACING ON BOTH ,` M • °off O a 4 O SIDES OF CATCH BASINS, AT TOPS OF DRIVEWAYS, AND ALL CHANGES IN DIRECTION, 12" MI \1 . 1 0 O t:>,__, O O C �, 1 1/2 " CUT JOINTS TO BE PLACED AT 15 MAXIMUM SPACING. 00 4 O oOp t> d rn o 0 O o I. EXCAVATE MINIMUM OF 12" OF EXISTING SOILS. a N \ \ \ / \ / \ / \ / / \ / / \ / / \ / / /, // 4. COMPACT SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATED TO 95% OF MA X. DRY DENSITY 2. PLACE MINIMUM OF 12" OF 3": CRUSHED ROCK. 1 rn / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3. CONSTRUCT ROCK BERM ALONG TRANSITION POINT TO ° //� //� / / % / / ' //, // /` ' (3 R E IC D) FINISHED ROAD SURFACES, DIVERT RUNOFF TO ONSITE AREA. SHEET NO. o 5. CURB TO BE BRUSH FINISHED. NOTE: ALL TRUCKS ARE TO BE INSPECTED alD CLEANED OF ALL LOOSE SOILS BEFORE LEAVING PROJECT. a EXTRUDED CURB DETAIL CEMENT CONCRETE CURB MONITORING WELL PROTECTIVE ENTRANCEWAY VEHICLE WASHDOWN ZONE NTS CAST IN PLACE BOX DETAIL W /DIVERSION BERM c3 - N tO N: < -' r,) - Z NTS NTS NTS 4 Z W _J Z 0 �` . O o (_D w z >0< Q J c N d 0 I I' 1 2 — 3 -- - '1 — 5 1 A -7 A CD�N��D - r „, t oy _ ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ,,, �, Landsca e Architecture 1 . lAVIEl. A. MACRON° i, Site Plannin ' g 1, OREG ilk A ' o Recreational Planning ,�, 1{ ,1 111 : W 1 0 0 .6 ; _ i i,� A 510 N.W. Third Ave., Suite 107 � ', • 2 , p i`�s_ j5 Portland, Oregon 97209 _- 4 4117.1 . r Telephone (503) 224-1225 ( .I , , �• Fax 294-1408 1 94 { ) ; * /14 ai 4 •?1 03 > c 0 4_, ` 4Y4 L mom 220 4#.0 4 . 1 a ” V c > / Ca c co c .. . _ _ _ _ :jj ; A;;;;:s: E :i OuantltY Comments Vine AI . 6 8 6 8 / T Sunset Maple Matched 1 i11 1 I to ' � yl ` t i p' ' 1 1 ;,� 1 _ CF Cornus flora 5 -6 ! _,,, .,...i. v •rw- / , l 1 ' *• . Pink Dogwood Nce form 1 ` ' ' ,1 I E* I • 111111 . .I� P FG Picea pungens, Glauca' 7 -8' 2 B B ,,; ; ■ + I g . f l Blue Spruce l 1� 1 J *1,ITA DC Cedrus deodora Extg 25 4 Tree Spade 1 ;,j. i * 2 - ii i� ` lr �� �► Deodora Cedar moved ' Move Carefully E 10) PY Prunus yedoensis 2 Calip. 5 l ' 0' '' �� �- .� Y 6 Gr ! 101 N t , " Yoshino Cherry Nice Spec. j fige Tot w l�tr�� l I - _- I APB Dwarf Bloodgood 7-8" sprd. i 3/4" cal. Red Jap Maple 2 Specimens {I, 1 ? � i 1 I r �irg � ► l �f P R C / Q 1 %r. - - - -� !'� �I a Air Al _ , I O . TM Tsu a mertensiana 7-8' 3 B 6 8 1 in 1 Lij /111, ILI 1 ,l1 / 1 ;i: f 4 • SHRUBS: l .A ti, L. mg 1 : o •Ivel ; 1, / EA Euonymous alata 5 gal. 5 8& B 3 ?, a "1 O 4,0 I Winged Spindle Bush ' 111 II 1 i 41 5e 0 AU Arbutus unedo 'C act' g , I, (/ � 3 •• �i ,i = M 1 Ii Compact Strawberry Bush 5 al. 2 0 48" O.c. ,,,� l • �� � � : `�� : ►. + �0% 1' f BAG 8erberis 'Rosy Glow' cot. { b i � a ��� , j>r{ � !►��T�I►�i.��1���ti�:�i `r( 2 5 gal. 26 ,� � � ��s • �, , •� I (t oco 4 Rosy Glow Barberry 42" o.c. �I 1. � �� � \ _ 4 • �� i ' (D MAC Mahonia a . Compacta 2 gal 30" o.c. ' W 1111=11 ,r Compact Ore. Grape 11' ! 11 ii + l iD' ..o PJJ Pieris jap. Pink Flamingo 24 - 30" 20 ; Ij Andromedia +I� 1 &►��a► PMM Pinus mugo mughus 15 - 18" 10 " > > u, 1,l ■ - ro + �r �r Mugo Pine 1 1 'l o 1 ��i 4,' 3 " 1�.. _.a •__I7 j ;fi� � j� !�!'T� _ X10 8 MP Rosa meinelde Pink i gal. i2 East Property '' I - ,6 . ! ' ► Z► 7 V IP _�,►�'_ PSI ► - . ,►.:►�.i►,.►,.► ; Z ' % i r ∎ W � •%". 8 Meidiland Hedge Rose Line Center 111 ; Q 1 � MR Rosa meinelde 1 gal. 20 ! �-- `� 9 24 o.c. .� i25 0 ,► Alba Meidiland Rose , i, ;:. g illiDA + � i pi RGS Rhodo Gerards 12 -15" 31 24" o ' / / S eries Pink Azalea ' u1 o a � � �' �.� � Mr RC Rhodo. Cynthia 2i -24" i9 i l ° E o � i r I {I' a r v d +I - 0 RSW Rh. Scarlet Wonder 15 -18" 11 > m u . ! PLAN 23 o CI L NORTH TP Thuj occ.'Emerald' 4 -5, i3 °' Scale 1 = 20 0 � VD Viburnum davidii 2 gal. 28 I +� ° "+ H I' 4t ] N �� VP Viburnum tomentosum 30 -36 "' 8 B & B ! I; '` 10 Double File Viburnum {;i i 1 , : , 1 REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP ,,� �, GROUND COVERS: 1 c Q / ,1 �, ...... ' DEEP RAINWATER COLLECTION I : ,-^n ^n, AA Annual's 4" pot est. 9" o. c. ', I. ro J i, 33 OF ROOTBALL { 1 I B ASIN MULCH TO GRADE , +. j �� Tri -space I ,,� ; ;. (� t : r7. \ �' ; = � :E:: AU Arch Uva Ursi �� " 4 Pot est !8 tri sp;3ce 1 D , IL ,� ,� tri -space i ' �� � � ■ �� 1 1 �I V M Vinca minor 4 pot est. a / ICE_ =��._���f� I c� i ,,. Z - 2' % i' % B' D.F. STAKE TWO TIMES ROOTBALL SIZE ''"' : ' ..11r -------- CONSTRUCTION GRADE l o _ ( ,t : T wo- %ter TYPE est S ee Civil Plan i " 0) � , SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL s.f. c EL S eeded � f f. N 7-47 TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH ii � - '/ ^1''� SL Seeded Lawn �' ' OPEN BUFi.AP ABOUT TRUNK. �.. / FOLD BACK AND UNDER. IVA tf ill I WA 7 S' DEEP RAINWATER COLLECTION BASIN MULCH TO GRAM ••••• ' LamBIE ' { �� hour T EIUSTINB 808. . ... _ _ , .. . . Fi0UR0UStLY WATER . COLLECT B ASIN MULCH I' : ;i ' E I'i BRADE sheet no. ;,, YIN %_ . DANE STAKES A MINIMUM , I, + , ; ' L Or Sa OF RESISTANCE, 1 � '. . I TWO TIMER fiODTBALL BILE , DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL , . , ' . ,, L — 1 „, ,ii • , ,, ;,1 6 1' 1,' P 1 — �- b 1 2 3 4 5 ATE HRS. fi `< - ,, ,:.. ,, ,.;::: . , 4- .::: O t / , S 1 #,/ , u= / , -:.% • N h m mt I ( .,:® ® N N N 14114). L' (ti CO o a �� • \ 110 co co N . N ��, > * .L � r' , . O \ .: w LEGEND �z y US . 0 • ,, G . . . wv O . - - ,...\ • �,! IX] A/C :::::ETE ll 0 $E r � ,C Q • G \ T Y` G GG' \ vp 1:1 0� P • FIRE HYDRANT _ ® % O 0 ' WATER METER ® SIGNAL ARM 4 1 1 :3 \ G ..4., / T 1= SIGNAL CONTROL ( � (r..Y GP v --i. - SIGN z w z 2, \ co I } - ; k il 11 o O , 0 0 (.9 _ i - C SANITARY MANHOLE . , C>n ! (� - - - -- /---- - . C L CATCH BASIN LJJ I v CI 401.1 o N PS C ON ORYWELL E-- 0 CRET > Z i \ . > Il -- . \ \ N Rik i< 6v b ANH O tE 55 PAO E ti 0 !NV ?09 -4 t5 \ POWER POLE �� ; EDG q /C `O P 3 W 0 . 41(P;c --i. 1 N �` UG E j r ! ; o � P m • o FENCE e‘ ° P . \ '0 , \ �¢� y G� n • ^ GAS UG GAS 4, . :4 _ 1 clrix) : . . '1. , . • . • . • > CC D N p' t �• ` m 1 ° M SS UG SEWER I _______________- / . 55 > 9 / N 1 Z .. N �G A C N w UG WATER I G v Q' G I _ rag :. • 0,10 -- --- ----__ o ,n z ( � RIM ! rqF Y MANHOtf s W J EIEV v :136. Xd N ( is . .v V'r • A...--- tNY E-, , J5 4 ; 0 0 �� # J !N 0 o • 1 glIel.m. 61. �i�'11�SC��fa1 � pv 1 / Pr P RKiNG SP S xi _. _ ':5 1- � �, ` � Pa Al EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS SHEET NO. i / . 0' il . WV 1 ---- 20'-0" ."-' I 'RECEIVED PLANNING • 1 . 1 / P`G PIG lo5 h MAY 0 6 1994 fi 1 4 l .. 1 a. 3 4 5 n j . 1 . T ; . T T Tip ( " - r , / � Q , (� ` <. } 1 I S H 7- 111 y _ , �jl I11j 11„ I jj' ' !ii: , a' , - - r . !iii 1 :ill t 3 ° _ • - r _ a il Iih, EXISTING CONCRETE ;N i' a ` WAIK,AND CURB • - - - x ®p0 ,. ' ' . � W Z A r �� c W Q / ! Y �9 , . s.. 8-.4 W w �r��E C� z . - �.�� e�j d t� i ;-, Z 1 ' � CG+�t� �� EXISFiVG SIGN �� / oo USING NG ASPR ALTIC � / YALK AND D CU B � . �' ..... _.-, ,_ -. - j II I'. . ., 3 • f ; - CONCRETE rNAL( s : \ s ,r�1, AND CURB i �, r . , `. , i f � PER CITY i 0 1 it STANDARDS / I ^� 'EMO E EXISTING ?,ROPERTY LINE --� 1'111 ±i � V / _�, ,� FENCE r PYLON - I i . �' �- -E7( STING ,AS ?HALT /'` / 6 � SIGN 1 I I � I I I 7 .--- i Zg o H , ASPHALTIC \ ,'' (TYPICAL) 1 I 1 , ^5 �'� tTYP C I C j ' _ . . ��_ DRIVE ' �/ �� is i , — _ — l I il ...,, ,___ .; _,. . %" ��' - e e . =x`,10 i �. 1 I ® TOP SIGN ,; , MENU BO ARD CLEAR,4NCE ' {{ O , !i • . PER CITY i� �5' R F, SIGNg !I I ,7 , — ( D , �F LA CED — -� V.! ESTANDARuS ✓ N +'LAY AREA 3 — -- I Y ) • , . , , a CU R ll • , \ CONCRE II .,... ,, . � PER CITY � CONCRETE ,YAK I � ■ STANDARDS . �' ___ AND CURB (TYPICAL) I I DINING i ! ' t.\ 15 0 I 1 '' • 780 SF\ _ ASPHALTIC PAVING , �, • E XISTING CONCRETE I ' / ° . I , , NAIK EXISTING CURB CQ'4CRETE --� ! `' _ _- -._.__ _ � ji I — ! '' ' ' WALK .4ND CURB ii i! i �� �-- �I ;', / r - NEW �� BICYCLE RACK 1 ' EASEMENT j i t 1 ' . $URG�RYILl �� PA +NTED PARKING N 1 i • ... AREA I o o ��3A BUI L. v' STRIPING (TYPICA I , { at i I i +' ACCESSIBLE ti �o � - � ' " \ * PARKING R AMP "`. i�� 1 .,/, , , . . , _ ., ,. . I / 11 1 , . s , ., . . 1/2 5' & 1' .... . . , - 6 4 0 6' 2 1/2" �'l�ll o I "' CIC /. 13' ^o " ,10 6 I� 10 12 0 ' 36' 0 " 78. 0 " � �1 j f� , - I ? jj T . ! 8 55' 18 0 3 ry►q 1 - j r ACCESSIBLE _ i i RAMP '��'�''s�� I a L o 0 (TYPICAL) a,.► f 1 ' • ��j c..) a 2 1 -- / i ' i �I. ' `s CONCRETE CURB i W W i / t 450' g w II ,0 0• R e (TYPICAL) EXISTING FENCE I i u' z �, 1 , R �- RETAINING WALL ' SITE STATISTICS i ` m „ `� , _ P 1.-- --CONCRETE CURB :, ASPHALTIC MASONRY �� 1 , { _ DRIVE TRASH ENCLOSURE i 03 SF C I ;�- ASPHAL I IC fi BUILDING 2 i i • 1 - - DRIVE 1 N EX +ST NG 20 0 20' 0 Ij i II . 1 SIGN i i TRASH ENCLOSURE + 200 SF ,�, i i, �XI TANG BUILDING - o 1 6 SF • . � a ° PAVING &WALKS 4,83 � z I DIRECTIONAL 4 ' _ _ _ o + R0 ,._._ r r 6 5 SF �27.r) 1 ' _ LANDSCAPING ij { �, o t /' S 320 42 00' W 125 03' } EST G i z : �` ASPHALTIC / N ,344 SF ( 56 ACRES) f I ; --- j SITE - 24 SURFACE / / i I _ EXIST PARKING CONCRETE CURB ° {' ' PROPERY LINE • �- Lu I • . j N > NOTE: I t - o .. j ___,..., ._.:_--- / _ - . ALSO SEE LA NDSCAPE PLAN, GRADING PLAN, UTILITY PLAN, AND SITE ! _ ' q 1 LIGHTING PLAN ' (.0 we_ ° u) iI t , :b • � � �I � SHEET NO � ,�� SIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN j 1' 2 0' j i t I j b VW i „,, a . fI� 1 III „I 2 ,, ,,,,.,- - , - II ? . , { II . . I .. , ., I ' „, 11 , i , .,,, , ,,,, ,,, , • . , ,, , . 1 , .- , 1 1 1 _ 1 . : 2 3 4 5 _� _ - . . A 11 " 1 2 $ 4 5 f T :. T T T T 1 1 1 t -- < 44 FLOOR PLAN NOTES 7/ lill y F Y O CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND STUB -UPS r 70' 8 * � ' WITH KITCHEN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN KITCHEN EQUIPMENT CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE HIS WORK . ' WITH ALL SUECONTRACTORS.WFOSE WORK TOUCIIE OR 18 ': ' 0 " 16' • a " AFFECTED BY HIS WORK - . _ o o ,£ 1. O EXTEND ALL TOILET ROOM WALLS AND GYPSUM BOARD TO UNDERSIDE OF ROOF AND INSULATE WITH (R -11) ALL TOILET ROOM WALLS. . ' +s O\ KII:: AT ALL EXTERIOR HOSE BIB LOCATIONS PROVIDE REMOVABLE - i \ \ PANEL AT WALL FOR MAINTENANCE. a ,3 ~ ;tl f; . TOILET ROOM WALLS SHALL. COMPLY WITH ANSI CODE 29' 4 ' .. 34' 0 • 4 7' 4 ' REQUIREMENTS FOR THE HANDICAP. O PROVIDE SOLID BACKING FOR ALL EQUIPMENT VERIFY J 4 0 4'0' • s 18 7 4 0 c- LOCATIONS WITH KITCHEN EQUIPMENT SUPPLIER ' ' " ® " A O PROVIDE WALL ACCESS PANEL (FOR PRIMER VALVES) - -a 14'X14' STAINLESS STEEL PANEL PROVIDE LETTERING ON - 3 PANEL "PRIMER VALVES ". + _ O PROVIDE PLYWOOD IN LIEU OF GYPSUM BOARD UNDER - r - DRIVE -UP WINDOW BY WIDTH OF WINDOW MINIMUM SEE C) W ' ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR FINISH OVER PLYWOOD Z 0 VERIFY FIRE EXT CABINET LOCATIONS WITH FIRE MARSHALL. - 0a o 1 0.5 j 2 LINE OF 0 PROVIDE 2X4'S AT 16" O.0 WITH GYPSUM BOARD EACH SIDE OVERHANG co RECESSED PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER. MOUNT BOTTOM OF ' _ UNIT 7 "AFF ,DS r i . . HOSE , PROVDE 2X BLOCKING IN WALL BEHIND ICE MACHINE TO BB Ki::? SECURE WATER FILTER LOCATE AT 70' A.F F DI RECTLY 1 a9 c --- BELOW WATER SUPPLY : 111 "— '�_`_`�`__�_1_�___ il_" �►. • N`• , U�7 FURR WALLS WITH P.T 2X4'S FLAT AT 24" O.C. S GAS OS I 1 COUNTER - - m METER BY S DRIVE —UP i 13 SURFACE MOUNTED BABY CHANGING COUNTER- 4 CO2 TANK , iv • K.E.S ' H SEE SPECIFICATIONS. i co � ^j \ ` J 7 �9 _ B HEADER ABOVE _ _ CI t _ - -- - ' 1- _`O�-- _►`_� "`� _`�___`► � warwar �\ II `• .�II� \:I /A1' /' '/ t�l���� ✓ /i1t./' /�1�:/l��.//�1�1L - 3 � ' __ ODA RACK ►iti1�+O��i1��y ' ►.►f�t�:I�►��1 �� � _I; -- 1 e i i � S KES � 1. � �J 3� etc y f 1 g9uE5R ;�; ---- O ■I�; 0 � 1 - LOW WALL : ' • F D r� �r ■��■r � � 31111 31111 �>� w � 9 1 C � � � �� FREEZER O �, v : BE ERAGE 3• _ s• FINISHED HEIGHT) F .S � t COOKING EQUIPMENT it o F S COUNTER 4 , f l 8�5 o 11 TAL STUD WALL - SNAKE O Y K E S 1 / S . HIND COOKING EQUIPMENT MACHINE - ! �•►�. +�•�t►�r�.v ��•a: 4 ?4^ 1 �, KITCHEN KES O RAG> PREP 4 F S READER ' O W ' BOARD 1 "' Z .., 19 .t 18 •- AvalR - MIViKVA ABOVE r o 0 , ' rs o LOW 9 ( 6' -5' FINISHED v 0 W - --- 1 a WALL 00 E 7 4 7 3 1 , HEIGHT) � C.5 W ' N y >fl - �' 4 G s . s _ ® 1-- 0 TABL 4 I • �" METAL . , LADDER I ' -' \o I, SINK ` -- _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - 11.7 - 17_7_7_11717:117 : ; Y. 1 10 1 BY K E S . ■ V Y 11111 :: a_ B I 0 . C OOL ER - _ W LL or) • f ° C couNT -10• FINISHED HEIGHT) 2 t 1 5 .._.+,_ ' BY LOW WALL Z !' KES 0 0 an (i) oei �- I J _' 4 �' 1 :7A. 1.l ••�_ li 0 i ' -4- if) i I ll , w 1 a LOCKERS OMBUSTION AIR SALES WAITING DINING ( & BY OWNER DUCT SEE 1/M4 ` - Ill ,� W N 2' 4 .. 5' 6 1/2' 3 2 1 J N ,% -� F S = el 0 0 AND -INK iv \ �3 1 /z" 6 w \ !! V� + „i►i t oi ✓.... ��.► ''! iw - SEATING AND LAYOUT BY ,' ` O - SEE K E S DRAWINGS 1 ; I ” Li A® i N A® BY KE ACHIN ;� I g r . - 1 COUNTER m A 9 D i J • WOM 7 I ,- m c c ►- .�vi Cr) x o o t s .� = 3 {- : 1 ...■II •FF F-) z Low WALL '� v v • A0 w w W w (1 6 : ��) n:t A 12 1�Un/ // ' '� , SINK NI � I�1��J,a '" !/�� /� %�► "- rri�V/ /yam //_�`4� / /I /L Z v l SERVICE �, 7' 8 MEN " LOW -S " (3 '' FINISHED HEIGHT CO 6 ` 1 F D T I WEL , 3]/2• ° 8' 2 3 1/2 " PIM. 4 1/ 3' 6 3 1/2' WALL LOW WALL 0) � HALL (3•-10' FINISHED HEIGHT O ►;-� W • SHER ' (,, 12 13 \ _ blial 61 1 11 X., __________ . M HO - E BO AO Z 1 D.S. DRYER VENT 31: � o WALL CAP D.s SEE MECH k. aC SHT. M4 , G_ LINE OF -- -- - w --I PIJ, lb -,tf.. . A 4 ., , 1 ` v LL v OVERHANG a — END 1 p • • , \ Q . s WALL LEGEND m ■� O 1 �� r r - 's iP • $ S 1/2• iv 1 C N R TE BL CK ti ; = : OCE 0 E„ 1/2 V ,, 5 1 2 � SHEET NO. " 6' 10 a .. 5' 8 , � �s 2' 0 ' 16' 0 " a 2' 0 ' WOOD FRAME � METAL STUDS : a 22' 0 ' ® 13' 4 " 4' 0 ^ 12' 0 ' ' 4' 0 ' o _____ - 13' 4 ' 2' 0 " ` Ktaiit COOLER /FREEZE BO XES 3 . , . , „s : 70 Q FLOOR PLAN e 1 9 • 1f4' 1' -0" 't L 1 — 1 1 1 2 3 . 4 5 0 ,_T. :,:.._..4 ) .. ce.. --- — ------- —. - . --- ... .,... ,.......- ,-...- - I. 4 C • ^N. . ... .• _`' .. . . r. . . . ... . ... _ . . . 1 . 2 3 4 r T - - - - T ' T T . . , .., , . , ... .y., •?!',,, . , . , , MI , , '•1' ihill . i 4 • • ...., 4 io MIMI A 'it Ulla , -74. i. n 1,1; " ,... RIMS 0 - - - - --- -- - - if; 1111111111 i REIM ;-,. - .t anis , , ffilm Nee . . U se to . , ui ›. z so . is (JO 0 :1) < P AIM . • MIME sisma a zi 2 CO MIMI MIMI • • ' , . ' U.1 A . rain • co I F S 1111 am ries , FINISH SIMI EMI ', • •rxxxo v (STUCCO) • :::: _ 461 , , .. 4-4715 : , ..1, w , , • w I, . • . • • ,.....,,, _ ,. r. ' .,... _ C) REVEAL DETAIL .4 I 1 t& r 0 ,, , '.:,::,.,'.,:;-;.' . . 5 SCALE! 3°- 11-0` A MI B 7 __} I* H ., -- t'-'-:<(g • Li: _••4•_ ,,,,,,. , ,:.,,, H , , - METAL FLASHING CAP --- ____[ , ____ _ __ . _ .„.., > , -1. l_LJI ;.. CCNTINU US ... 11._ ,..: . -- , , .. . _ . . - / t i 1 1 ' - 1 ' . . 2 ,_■--"--- H / ',,,.,•,''.:.. ; :11: 16 ‘•' lk . , • 8 1 _ - ( 1 11 e) ' . , . • (:)‘: - — .,... w c‘j .•% TGL T `•'• 8 ..-, _ 10 0 vs, ,-;-=., • 1 „. B .. io . I--- ..•isiiimmasumsarmissares GO ‘‘. '' ,_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. , / . . - ,-_-____— — —. , 11 111111111.1111111111111111111111,1/4111,1111111111111,111.111WIllaff _ • 1 ,----J . .............-................_______L_________ IIIW =--- ., immusonsumy N massoinummuoms , , i / G T • ----- _.... _ .. 4 — ROUTER CUT/ I EIFS 21: _ _ ..____ . l ., L .. 10 VEE GROOVE (STUCCO) . . . . ' is u) BROKEN-FACED CONCRETE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOWNSPOUT BLOCK WITH 2" REVEALS SYSTEM WITH INSULATED ._ . ." GLAZING SEE Ach .., ) - = W . 4.. , EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNS; FRONT ELEVATION .. PROVIDE BLOCK OUTS IN EIFS _ C REVEAL DETAIL , . FINISH FOR BUILDING SIGNS VERIFY WITH SIGN SUPPLIER 1/4"-1*-0" ..,, p-r .... . . ' FOR ACTUAL SIZE REQUIRED A SCALE! 3- E-0" , 7 0 . . • 0 44 44 . „,,_, ... 2 :, ..c ..... -i 1.-- . , . _ — , g• q. J g ...: (I) 4 , 4 :: , EXTERIOR ?,, ' 1 METAL FLASHING CAP ---.- BUILDING 4 . SIGN , ,- EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE _ - ______-_ V TAIL 16 • , METAL ROOFING PREFINISHED , MET L ROir .. . BROKEN FACED CONCRETE . 7 . ../ , ..4.. ,,/ -7-- Ili CON NUU :. ME O T I L GU 1111.111111111111.11P PP" -. ,- . . iiigh W >7 : . ,-.--?, CONCRETE BLOCK (INS .... TRASH ENCLOSURE) .. .. ..... ...... ........ ....PAINT • .4111 I / \- REVEAL DE EIFS FINISH (STUCCO). INTREGAL COLOR ........mir 11 , ,‘ SEE ilink it ..................r , 4,' . . —I SOFFITS (EIFS FINISH/STUCCO) INTREGAL COLOR / moulir METAL FLASHING, CONTINUOUS ., METAL GUTTER, METAL DOWNSPOUTS... .. .. _ .... ...... ..... ..... ....PAINT .., • Ce 7, HOLLOW METAL DOORS e) ._......., MINIM : ' 0 it , AND FRAMES PAINT . REVEAL Ilik ii (6 irk 16 ..i... T 116: GL ' . ,: - ... :1 17 i1 / \ '..\\ ,.. DETAIL , METAL CHANNELS AT I 10 10 10 1 .4. TRASH ENCLOSURE....... ...... .. ...... PAINT ' DOWNSPOUT SEE EIFS FINISH T GL CO C 4 • 6 /\ DOWNSPOUT 61 I -•!" SEE ALSO SPECIFICATIONS. , SE E Aik (sTucco) ------________ 1 10 SEE '- EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEDULE TO BE PROVIDED BY ARCHITECT 1 1P F I < °REVEAL DETAIL SEE Alk , itik - ilk 4 ei 1 0 1 0 \ 1 0 I lirr -,_.: wu ji....1.......Lr.... 0) Lill.. .i. LI LL: ••■•11■1 ....:-..-. IMMB " . . ''. '''''''':'-'; : '.. . ■ - ' ' - '''' ' ' r' ' In & • 1.11111111 TGL TGL ,,I MI iii ' • Mini 9 ali . • ." TGL ii al i 10 .. ... V in . -. _ , - , - , . ..‘.,,, . SHEET NO. __ ____ IIII 111111111111111.111•01.11111111111111111111111111111.11■1111/11 — I MI ., . _ ‚ _ 1 5 , 4 Y . BROKEN-FACED CONCRETE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 11 -t. BLOCK WITH 2" REVEALS WITH INSULATED GLAZING WITH INSULATED GLAZING 4 ..„ • ENTRY ELEVATION ,- -1 1/41-0" - - -- - L 1 1 . 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 , r G • — .... — ' * 41117, • ''.-; , . I e 4 ' ' . T . . , „ - :r .,- - -I 1 2 3 4 5 r , T . T . - T T . . _ „.. . . . • t 6 „ lif . Ar ' L''7. : ;. . „ , L,., , 444 . •V 5 c'l ..44 , ' i 1 . -1, A i — I . ' • :Ell! '' ' ' ;' .,_' :' . •>‹. 6 m Q — . = r d = A . • 0 a). -1 cc& . 0 -J UJ ' r-4 .. i . ..c = - . r w 0 ili ill . Law g CO CO 01 i l l (±) [7)* co 44T, B D. A 441 c37 „, / USA 3 METAL FLASHING CAP , 0 . 1.. T ATE 16 ....._ . - . ',. .z _ - Ch _ H —o-- < f - -,----- '-• V —. 0 .. r.. META_ ROOLING =‘'`i ..---. ( n cj , I___ - w .4 2 — ( CONT INUOU META _ 2 •_f_ 6 .,,,..,-;= >--- 16 GUTTER -P,„ d'Z ' ; ; ; .___: . L ■ 1 .... 1 / 11_ i_Li - . L , > .......- u_ :,.? . 1_ I, i I 1 tt \. \ ....:„ ,„ 6/2Z ,..,, .-.., (1) 0 1 . , - 3 i A 1 .......... 4 ILI . i.s? 16 10 1 '',, - - - z L1) Z -,. K AM --, MA REVEAL . { ( E S IF T SZ C I O N ) ISH '' 0 — 0 -1 ' Alltk ,Pg IllkY ____ ler DETAIL .-* le) .. 8 14 .-' REVEAL 0 Ill C9 *t. . TO REVEAL DETAIL la DETAIL Liu ";”' C . — , , 0 ) , , . — , .- . , . ... r , .. . , • ________,. • •; ,, . i- 4. 4% .. ' IA ( f) ; t• GUARD POST . . . . SE 45) > It ' 1 : . .........- — ...■ ii.:; 7Aallin'" .' '1 1 i(7—°2 a LI p 1 , : _ 1= 10 T. SLAB tiP, . _ ,-.. . ,, ' ----) L if 1 - 4 B . I— -- . , : , . •,...._ Mil : <-'.... N 1— TRASH ENCLOSURE METAL LADDER BROKEN FACED CONCRETE OWNSPOUT M 7 ' H : E SEE SEE 10 . liEr BLOCK WITH 2" REVEALS AM Mr . '= REAR ELEVATION 1/ 4-1-0 : .-0" !)---- 6 ,.., -7- tri .(-(-- sz ' i--Bi .. . ' . 111 (7)' . • EXTERIOR • _ 0 ,z . BUILDING SIGN -:=:- H 3 id t , Mk , 16 CAP- .... ..„, , T. PLATE Alli 16 METAL FLASHING ------ _ _ _ — _." . ' .- -.11 1 — Ark 1 . . . Ala . . PET AL OOF I -__._____________----- 7 ===:::_,,,,, wee u_ .1 i ....-' CDNTIN OUS 4114116" ----le....v 1 16 N1ETAL UTT - E -...-.'- / R , .. =-- , Mr II 1111 1 ., co .-er • --------- :::::::: ---- 'lair > i •-:::::: ----------- ,, . , . L J ___.,_ s% LLI 16 2 ,... 10 - A REVEAL DETAIL AnREVEAL DETAIL 0 REVEAL . IllEir EIFS FINISH DETAIL REVEAL 4 4 MI --____ u 3 _ DOWN SPOUT 10 10 . 1 117 _ 1 (STUCCO) DETAIL DOWNSPOUT 0) , SE lik AN - " a il SE") (.0 C '419' 10 117 < , i UJI >4 F- tj) . IMO - 111111 . . = .._, ... olle . I 6 1.0 in - II - J_ . T. SLAB I 1 \c\ i MI ii, - Ai MINNIII■loir 11111 GUARD POST DRIVE-UP Alk GUARD DRIVE-UP DOWNSPOUT BROKEN FACED CONCRETE lir ,, t '' -,''"? - '=.,- - 4 ' : 1 ' ' ' . ' ; ' • f . k i `. . 7. 7 1 :: . 114:44. ,' ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM SE AI WINDOW 9 POST WINDOW SE Alk BLOCK WITH 2" REVEALS .- SHEET NO. .4 WITH INSULATED GLAZING Iltir SEE %Er , ',. k- 41 . P . , . ' '.. = 01r-1 5 4 ... DRIVE-UP ELEVATION . ,.. 1/4"•=1*-0" .41 t - r 4, le, ' 1 1 1 _L '- 1:$ 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 1: -- --- -- _ _ - - __- - - — 2 1 \ A 1- , -..-• . OW I . - • ,,,,__, t .....-';: '..-:7.'1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING ' t 20 - - : /: Landscape Architecture - , Site Planning ,�' Recreational Planning f OREO0 ::.?::' 3 ry + .. .. . 39 , # „ 5i0 N.W. Third Ave.,.Suite 107 " . °. y 224 = s' �� ;, 1 s, Portland, Oregon 97209 1► Telephone 1503) 224 -1225 = - . i1.141110 x. Fax 234 -1408 + �1► 222 _ > > c III.4a o Egi . _„ s a 220 ; ; , `� L co 3 sow iitilitf .. ‘46 • � 111 AILIKVS: '0 ' C I t *; r' / �j 1 ,_ ' VI C fa 4 4 ' 1 �00 > ti.�i tJ]i�� ,, „._ „_.,,,,_:,..:: 147 r � ��, � , PLANT MATERIALS LIST 1. i ■ ..; •-- 00Pfri* il 1 ,, O� �►� / f i, l 7114* �`�� Symbol /Name Size Quantity Comments , TR ; ��7 r z , It 10 , 44 0,40 ��� ( q w ��� t� 4 0 AC Acer circinatum 8 l0' 7 Multi -Trunk W; ` " / / / � / • �ii iii 1 � � ! � Vine Maple �i L', _ ' ma '`'' --- Al G AR Acer rubrum 'Red 2 1/2 Cal. 4 B & B S I A. , Sunset Maple Matched ti .z.,; - « u «�_ ... y 1 � - L � `b CF Pink u o wood 5-6 1 Nice form • 4001111k 1 Til �� i Qi RYA PFG Picea pg, GIauca' 7 -8' 3 B & B f�� t '� Blue Spruce — ��> _r di _ OC Cedrus un deodo Ext 25' 4 Tre Spade � �. I w $ r De odora Cedar moved ove Spec Garefu]1 .,�► 111 Nice y _ it " - ---- �9t PY Prunus yedoensis 2" Celip. 5 . w r • re N Yosh]no Cherr > 4-.0 I- �j �� — ---_ ``� �- } poogoo 7 -8 sprd 2 Specimens A PB Acer aBldd " e ' Dw arf Red Jap Maple 1 3/4 cal. 3 cc Z � I R �jR 1 1: t � !k + TM Tsuga mertensiana 7 -8' 3 B & B { _ "' ► # p . '' I i lo • � �I �� - SHRUBS: k w �_ ! o •l.�rlf+r Euonymeus alata 5 gal. 5 8.& B ,F 4 : : { ', �� �,I ,. Winged Spindle Bush ' * ; t .6 . , i 0 t( o. 0 0 0 AU Arbutus unedo 'Compact' 5 gal. 20 48" O.c. 2. b I�` � � • rr� Compact Strawberry Bush � _ ���� wit frug BAG 8erberis ' aq Ras GIow' 26 " • - � tta. r � ► s � . ` ; IL^i� ''• :4V""' . ;;�� • y 5 gaJ. 42 Q.G. rte �� \ � ,1 ��. � � ,�,� _ , .'� 4� �, Rosy.Glow Barberry � 4� • °;�f�x� ` ��,A�'� j� MAC Mahor . Compacts 2 gal 3 30" a.G. "° _ I3 , Compact Ore. Grape l o t •( oh** PUJ Pieris lap. Pink Flamingo 24 -30" 20 �rya ',j Andromedia - nth e jJepl► PMM Pinus mugo mughus 15 -i8" i0 t�t ' !' 11P Mu gfl Pi ;• c ICI i 1 r �- - ,� .•� srt►• t r . r � f © ee gal. i 2 p > � T +r ,r�a►f� + �- MP Rosa meinelde Pink 1 a). East Property � ` X 9 0 ' 4► 0:.► �i►z i :�►;~t►; ;��►` A � +��t nQ a � Q 8 Meidiland Hedge Rase Line Center L L '' - !� _ r 0 MR Rose meinelde i gal. 20 a 7 ---/- • 125.0 i • Alba Meidiland Rose 1 / / RGS Rhodo. Gerards 12 - 15" 3i 24" o.c. �+ / 1 Series Pink Azalea ,y i AC AtSOdo. Cynthia 2i -24" 19 § 'a ro 0 R >' SW Rh. Scarlet Wonder i5 -18" 26 �1;_j § g PLAN NORTH �••��,.. TP Thujia occ.'Emerald' 4-5. 13 F ti •a,' > z ...- g i Scale S" - 20'0" VD Viburnum davidii 2 gal. 36 ° 30 -36 'I ' Moult �� VP Viburnum tomentosum 8 B & B Double File Viburnum, REMOVE SALM' FROM TOP , ::: in Or ROOTBALL GROUND COVERS: e 4 De+�RAC:Arenca ecnoN AA AnnUal'S 4" pOt eSt. 9" O.G. '.- .� BASIN NJLC" TO GRADE. J � � Tri -space IA �� ` ireia , ` ,C AU Arc Uva Ursi ; ;: t " _ , _, RANr>Na sos 4� �" es S 8 tri space �� �� M8S3. .. _ : ::C EuBruat sa _ !� Day L 6 CR- IFNTL'JB 9�. minor est. i8" tri -space � ' 1��- �.,.��� � �'�# Nib --, ,4I ' I a - R' x a' x f W. STAIR TWO rIMES ROOTBALL SIZE } CO148TFUCTION MINX est. See Civi1 Pian ic.:, . en OTNAP SS Seeded Swale Mix S•f• C { SHAW PLANTING DETAIL , . co - TREE wriAP TO ,r 1 INSA.41 OPEN dX 1LAP MOO TR RBC SL Seeded lawn u - , - ..-- - - - '''':!;' 11 7' OM RA$7wATER COLLECT3ON i Add USN ALCM TO BRA M I M .� '� Tk1041ki3!!&i.Tw /,TEA - �i � C . OU.EOTN USX KJ?OL ON ;," ... • � !pall c€sAas ;f POO BACK AND LNIOEN. ill �: IM � 1IN OTAKEaAr sheet no. f : I f aritorAz 4t r.eo.T�s Roo°�ru � oecmmious TREE PLANTING DETAIL { } t sy K 3 . � j F - i 1 1 — 1 — — -- ----- - - - - -- - - - --- - -- _ -- - - -- --- - -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- -.l , L, » ,. -,.., . __ ,.„ -a 1 2 3 4 5 - - - _ __ ____ _ ___ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ ______ ____ ___ _ __ __ ____ ____' '____' _ _ _ laj __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -s °• - % • ,, p' y r - ; " -�*Y - _ ;�'n g - - . '' ,, • 'k - ' '. a - - - _ ' - , , , . ., . - i — — > s - . ` rt - •.. ' , ' t ♦ SITE FIXTURE SC Y :w y P, ^gam , r ;i '+'^ "t' + . /. 3. :� . f. 9. _ ' .• - HEDULE • • A _ r' , e ; PL 2t WATT METAL HALIDE PARKING LOT LiGHT FIXTURE ?' f ' DARK BRONZE FINISH ON 20' SQUA T EL . = } " RE POLE AND ANCHOR BASE . F ,: EXCELINE "SAF21MAA - S t. : °- PLi SIMILAR TO PL EXCEPT WiTH HOUSE SiPE SHIELD y° ' '} EXCELINE +SAF25-IMAA - S - H5 SHIELD ' ►°° "g / - > CO 4' y _ � � / a ri N � LW7 �u • a ® N 3 1•- p ti• Q 0� J f � L Z OO V p N ' , - ..---- PYLON SIGN �, 120V : o o - ill r ' : ti > s fp s , • y , �`,\ r ° ` __1-.z.. _ _ f ' -I ..,,/ . \ -1" ,•••".------- --'''''-- \ \ . 1 1 ! � • . _Na' r \ CHAMFER . , . -, I AN �C �� % iv . 4.: \ _ , - REOESSEC? 7WQRESCENT fIXTU Z - : i ; ,,; ANCHOR C4LTS. ti30LT CIRCLE ? USA ., , , j j , , 80ARD ' W ktocn�• ► FLUORESCENT FIXTURE i� r'r p • I 2 RE ' S II r ; 9)01 ?A p Q ` • % ' . c oP• C o7 6C �++� F�tTV�$) 24 (. ,: SUSPENDED- IN ENT rirruR G r A OE MPACTE4 FItL l , r ( SORP CL/ G?�2 C `` % `�� � >id �/ ` ' : • F• ;,1 _ F •--� STRIP �2rpO RESCE' ?IXTUR� ., `d 1191 � 1 r• ��% � ` \ Ad ' T-5+ R'RAC1C LIGHT \ r II CD4 • ___ - ` . --- _ PL ' EXIT LIGHT r d ♦ �r ,� d 3440F'SI CONCRETE AT . r-, �� J/ - i� 5U d �� za MAYS ° , / 0 JUNCTION .BOX { r _ • d,� ,� • �. SIN $ Wr410.1.I'llf CONDUIT , , , , ,, . , .. N LE 1�OL SWITCH, ? wl►Y ° A �' --- L: , , _ ._ . , , . • } � P • HO R S WITH Y V C p LEX A VP RE C EPI '� L °4 T z ,, , EX , , ! ▪ T • • r _ _ __ _ �'' s nos 8 ON CENTER � • '� 0 OTOR CONNECTION ���� ' - Lli 0 1.4' 0 L T' ' STARTER " ._ b . • , , W ` - I © ,f — _ [ D ISCONNECT • = -• i E 3 A TELEFHONB .That { ' • ,, ., .. - r : :i i- i: / QTf: .._ ,,. v, _ , ... . - I ° �. ` � 7 Y4 ISOLATED Gi2OUND NOT :; ° ff - M • W - • GRO UND WIRE il'Ll , P , i�c r tN�: F fie. • . f 1 _ _ :II1 , -. M ; . inn � 0 p ■ 41 PL ii J - -' _ z , ▪ ' • - -'� 0 PL -----7' 1 cz • ▪ • — _ = rte -__ � —1 oJ • TM > - - s 82c 42'00' W125.03' z PI EGTiONAL SiGN i. a Z oti� 44 120V x CYO Z yJ H co c)Z . F — ! [ L J �" 4 1•—•1 z z 3 Q Q LI LD Q Q • + J H i i �. itl�lC�'1� c� H �- CALE: 1' =20' -0' U F— 0� W = _J, w 4 . 1 vi Q • • SHEET NO. , - . :-__ ., .. , . - , ., , . E1 . , . .. , , ,. _ , . , . w . . , , . . . , 1 I i _ . , . , . . • , . ... .. . . ., , ., , . . . . .' .,,b,,,„, _ ____, , ___ . ._ . - OPTIONAL FENCE BACKUP SUPPORT ' + \ DEPENDING ON THE PROPERTIES ' \ \ OF THE SELECTED GEO�EXTILE CONSTRUCT GEOTEXTILE \ 1 ` i 7 �' n FOR EROSION CONTROL r ■ \ \ ` ) - t �' 2_2-‘ � 5 a 4 7''' - -- r \ ,�w $ , f EOV T T, FILTER FABRIC FENCE a , \\ \ \ \ ; , y y ' s um �N AS REQUIRED BY SPECIAL PO FELT, TS -700 TIMBER OR STEEL POSTS, " + r \ \ ` \ - v " °�'` USES 'POLY FELT T5 -500 , r \ \ � yo b :? N .• ' \ \ / \ sw rec kAilS °4 1 PROVISIONS, SPACED AT A LY - \ ` MAXIMUM 6' CENTER TO '=EXXON GTF -10I" ,- 1 + ■ \ \ r - 224_ 1 \ " \it. v+T w ___Wr 1 \ r ^� cw N � �• $ t 1 OR PROJECT APPROVED r r r ` ` \ `t _ 11-1 •. 1 , CENTER _ + \ r t. • - EQUA(.. (BY CITY OF TIGARD) \ \ I STAPLES,WIRE, — : •' - ' - + + E CONTROL FILTER ` — — — — HOG RINGS, ETC TRENCH FOR ANCHORING G_1rOTEXTILE 1r \ FABf�IC FENCE -\ \ - / / , I f I W RNA e I ; ARKHi i /� a ili o .., (BACKFILL TAMPED IN . TRENCH) . , ` \ O \ ■ \r ari OPTIONAL I \ Q� � -� \ \� wg... / _ x.44 p .z SUPPORT JI,- FLOW �,_- /�G Z \6 ��' 2 2 �2 1 i - a w sw¢nea. '4' " > FlR . o a POST / I11 '� \ \` G 2 � e 2 \ 3 ''� 1 � � :. � , \ \ c �, �a _ 4G EXTG CHAIN I - it a , ` 2 4 v I > > . s > . sw y r C { , � MA PR i N 1.N t , 5T 3 / \y � :LL! ��� \ \ \�\ \ G� � �"� � \ F� f, r � ''� � =�`\ 2\ ' LINK FENCE " — 1 '' 1 ��� �d ; 6 /� _ /�� /�\ °° 2''�'�\ 6" MIN \ , � C, , 6 0 `1 ` �. � 1 ` \ ' ,�, F „ YC ' 2 � \ i r � D RHAM " :::,,,,, 4 ` i �a a a �� \\ 11> \\ G " ,6 L W / ro p O - 3 �r it .++c�� ^3 O 4 -- i UNDISTURBED SOIL DISTURBED ; :; L ,k , \ 4 G 2\ t -4 s•-•4 so. \ \ G 1 . 5 C a � 9 \ O \ FO 2 \ 1 0 1 ::::,,,,,,,,,,_::: 3 n= Y,r� Q �, t owooY 0. / sor Y i ♦ i sr G 2 / ��} \ \ `�/ \ 2 \l \ FCo I Itr4 _..`:0i, ::::,, ^ a . :w i F . G \ '. r �'' ,n t EROSION NT ROL Q , 4G 2 2 \6 z /� , Z � � if 5 co . : cc AfB: itt ' E FillPri-A Iv' ir li i E_'. i s \\ G g \6 0 4G \ � t a � , r, o c r,�., _ s � 1111 • � i i'"w trice , J "NS FILTER FABRIC FENCE ' !„....,,b ` 4G y / E� 6 2 ` � y G � . ° W P ° o ; 1 3 1 �� `` i ° \ U 2 2\2;:i b E +i C G 2 \ \�1 \ ti§z:. 1 �r "' R ; INLET SILT BARRIER 4 o 2 z "� �" s ' " ` SW KENh (TYP. 4 PLACES) , 4 F ° ) , r t I .., r--,' - - G 2 \6 ---, - --.... , , VICINITY MAP ROCK BERM AT EXIT ° N . I 7 J 4 I I NTS (PLACE AT HIGH POINT OF N 1 1 \ FINISHED ENTRANCEWAY APRON) \2 6 C ' \ � / / o i 2 \6 \ \ ROAD i r 24" " / 7,9.-"c, II EN I F G 2 `,\� • ,,,c;,4-- , 1 ` 1 t GENERAL NOTES SURFACE 6 MIN . - \ 4 / I_; I 4 r y ' MIN , 1 — + Topo g r aphic information provided by Burton Engineering & Surveying, Tigard, 1 k , � ® ,� f 1 OR. V / ' r f•ii� I t � . _-_ G ".�� It `� 3 "± // % ' % c:0' \1.0)'N' -' f 't , ` r r ' i i. 1 ' 1 Prior location to any mark excavation ting or site ities. work, the contractor shall call 639 4171 for - ` I ► � '���� — �� CRUSHED ROC . �� \ r t 111111.1111 r up of exis util • ' � ,4 � �� , , \ \ \ / �\ / // `G / / / FF.-216.40 � + \- - F— ' EROSION CONTROL NOTES / y / \ \ / \ \/ \ \� \ \�\ \ ,\ \ ,\ \ \'\ \ , l is 0 --' 2 � 1 i I 1 Al t water system construction, materials and workmanship shall conform to the \ / � /- / , 1 1 latest standards and practices of the City of Tigard Building Department - 5 1 / 4 - 1 _� 12" MIN 2 \� ° 6 I a� CO I) DO NOT DISTURB MORE AREA THAN NEEDED FOR ° �� 1 1 1 All additional construction, demolition, materials and workmanship shall conform CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS. , Z � 2 \ 2 \� �v G 2 \ �' 2 \ I.L aF 1 ' 1 to the latest standards and practices of the City of Tigard and Washington ■ FG 4 , 1 4 4 G ' I 1 >. 2) EARTHWORK SHALL NOT BE PERFORMED DURING PERIODS OF " / i 1 1 t COUnty. PRECIPITATION, AND SHALL NOT CONTINUE AGAIN UNTIL THE I. EXCAVATE MINIMUM OF i2 OF EXISTING SOILS. — /� 1 SOILS ARE STABLE ENOUGH TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND 2. PLACE MINIMUM OF 12" OF 3 "t CRUSHED ROCK. / \ II I 0I E---- 7 1 `G Z \ ; . � I 3. CONSTRUCT ROCK BERM ALONG T f STORM SEWER CONS) RUCTION NOTES SEDIMENTATION TRANSITION POINT TO r r ���� I 4 J r ��°', 1 Rain drains shall be ASTM 123034 PVC sewer pipe or smooth bore high density 31 ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE N PLACE AND FINISHED ROAD SURFACES, DIVERT RUNOFF TO ONSITE AREA. / r 1 polyethylene pipe ( "ADS N 12'). IN WORKING CONDITION PRIOR TO DISTURBING AND EXPOSING A LL TRUCKS ARE TO BE INSPECTED AND CLEANED EXTG l r ' Witt ' J A NY SOIL SURFACES II FILTER FABRIC, STRAW BALE / NOTE: / J ' Materials for storm sewer piping shall be 16 gauge spiral rib aluminum, 16 gauge SEDIMENTATION BARRIERS, SEDIMENTATION TRAPS AND OF ALL LOOSE SOILS BEFORE LEAVING PROJECT. CHEVRON ` 1 ( 1 , J I g spiral rib steel with protective treatment 1, lined corrugated DIVERSION FENCES) ' STATION A5 ,' + i k . „1.3_,11/ Cr r / 'Cr polyethylene ( "ADS N -12 ") or plain concrete sewer pi class 3 4 ALL DEVICES ARE TO REMAIN N PLACE DURING ENTRANCEWAY VEHICLE W A S H D 0 W N ZONE 2 �° \ � 6 2 i \ 5 J 1 t---- CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL DISTURBED SOIL SURFACES HAVE FG 2 F� 4C' i � �G 2...: c)----. 2 \ r r ��� 1 Pipe bedding material shall be select native material except where saturated or BEEN STABILIZED TO MINIMIZE EROSION l *CI 5 r r r (J) ground water conditions are encountered, then gravel backfill shall be used. I � \ G 2 \ � Ba s h all be select native material. Backfill shall be coin acted to 95% of the 51 ALL DISTURBIL SURFACES 0 j :– / Lt: / THE IMMED REGROWTH OF 0 Ir"!,�- �t�A ♦�, ; '*��•:"!�,- o�tO:S�T'a:`�� �J N N pa th e property tine, sfiall co nform to the latest standards and practices of the � VEGETATION WWF 6x6x10 2 \ b '� �� Ar o �� �5 �s City st of T Plumbing Department. , il ' . , F G i ;.. 2\ \5 \5 6) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR POLICING - SLOPE VARIES ' : G 24 G 2 I Sanita Sewer laterals shall be PVC sewer pipe (ASTM D-3034) or Ductile iron THE JOB SITE AND MAINTAINMG THE EROSION CONTROL •% GAp P -, . \ 1 ` se pipe. MEASURES THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES ON CONSTRUCTION. _. - �� ; tiG - \ ■ THE POLICING AND MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NQT BE ground water conditions are encountered, then gravel back ■11 wowing fill 1111A, \ g �,�' 2 \6 ° , \ 63 ` 1 , z \, 2 \6g 2 \ -+ 3 Pipe bedding material shall be select native material, except where saturated or LIMITED To 2 G 2 Cr G c, , fill shall be used. \ / ¢ ► ,.` _ � „ `_ , ! /\, A) VERIFYING THAT ALL AREAS ARE GRADED SUCH, THAT - - I� •.... A= :_ . eissf►!�' �.. -.'; �.i \s` ;z : � z .: lg=,: .3� •.., ' — __, _ Backfill shall be select native material, Back611 shall be compacted to 95% of the ALL RUNOFF IS DIRECTED TO A SEDIMENTATION TRAP ., . „ , • ENTRANCEWAY VEHICLE o Z \ 1 ., x � \ maximum relative density. FACILITY BE FORE DISCHA TO SURFA # Seale 1 = 2O WASHDOWN Z , �� • , 2 4 \ 1 < / - \ Prior to backfillin sewer service lateral ends and sewer ma c t B) REMOVAL OF TRAPPED SILTS AT SILT BARRIERS, A 0.50' CEMENT CONCRETE y 2 9 io zo 4 0 60 0 , l 9 , ., Contractor shall notify the Engineer in a timely manner so that construction "As SILT TRAPS OR POINTS OF ACCUMULATION r 1 fOr i0 ba Of e I ADDITIO AL ROT CTIVE MEAS RE AS REQUIRE fi TT - e 0.30 MIN COMP DEPTH ,GR SUR BASE ' COURSE - I 9a in at n be the f ra Co o to �. IIt m may gathered. red. 1 n ract r ckfilis pri th c N P E u s D ,- r - n IN / gathering of required information, the Contractor shah be required to expose the DUE TO JOB SITE CONDITIONS. ' - • - r . ; 2\• / r ' ends of service laterals and sewer main cleanouts. a u - 4 Ci / - r i D I MONITORINs OF VEHICLES LEAVING THE SITE TO COMPACTED SUBGRADE 951e I • +` - m MINIMIZE TRANSMISSION OF LOOSE SOILS TO THE P UBLIC - /. , ROA DWAYS. , v 1 J , F W ATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES REINFORCED C 0 N C R E T E SLAB S E C T I O N - E 1 IF SEDIMENT IS TRANSPORTED ONTO A ROAD SURFACE; . ; f- Backfill for wa ter trenches shall be select native material. Backfill material shall THE SURFACE IS TO BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE EN FOR CONCRETE DRIVE PAD be compacted to 95% of the maximum relative density. OF EACH DAY ' W 1 BACKFLO PROT Z 1 MATERIAL STOCKPILES ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM , i+ - _ NTS • . ' 1 PRECIPITATION BY THE FOLLOWING MEANS- ., - ` - . - 1 A backfiow protection device approved b y the Oregon State Health Department y IS re iced on all commercial facilities TEMPORARY - COVER PILES WITH TARPS OR PLASTIC SHEETING .. WEIGHTED WITH TIRES, LUMBER OR CONCRETE BLOCKS ., 3 s - • 1 The contractor shall obtain a plumbing permit from the City of Tigard 639 -4171 PERMANENT -COVER PILES WITH TARPS OR PLASTIC OR 1 RESEED, PERIMETER AREAS AROUND PILES ARE TO BE - �= ; ' ` I Additional backflow protection may be required at a futurA d to, demf1dilg 011 SURROUNDED WITH EROSION CONTROL FILTER FABRIC FENCES SLOPE VARIES .. - - " - water usage (1 e. - boilers, chillers, chemical additions, booster pumps, etc ). . UNTIL SOIL SURFACE IS STABILIZED WITH RESEEDING. s I I I I L I ► � i � � ► � , I , - .= EXISTING G RADING B I THIS SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS /- ' / / - Y //. PA VEMENT INTENDED TO BE UTILIZED AS A GUIDE TO CONTROL THE Fi nis hed grade elevations and drainage schemes have been established on the TRANSPORTATION OF LOOSE SOILS FROM THE PROPERTY THAT NUISANCE PROBLEMS OUTSIDE OF t I 1 "R 6" 4" CONCRETE CEMENT site plan to promote drainage away from buildings Finished grade elevations THE CONSTRUCTION AREA 1 " - I / CAUSE WATER QUALITY AND ma be increased if the drainage scheme can me maintained { y ,r F G SI DEWALK OR LANDSCAPING DEPENDING UPON THE CONTRACTOR'S CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, T i /2 "R SOME PORTIONS OF THE PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL PLAN MAY E 0.20' ASPHALT CONCRETE PAV'T, CLASS B ' - 1 TYP B E VARIED ACCORDING TO THE JOB SITE CONDITIONS. ALL • a C H AN E NGINEER THE PLA TO N MUST B ADJUSTMENT iEWED AND APPROVED BY ilkill.maitairmas 0.50' MIN COMP DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COUR = , / / ASPHAI -T m STRAWBALES `" r ' \ \ \ � � SURFACE : a / COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95% \ \ \ \ \ i PAVED PARKING AREA SECTION= (TYP l- . , - - _ ' . - - 0.2' CRUSHED SURFACING � �•� � � o. ° ° a \// ' ° , - =.- = ' i�•_1/ - ,rl�ih \ FLOW ; FLOW NTS B ASE COURSE :+/rv / 7 _ ! \/ \' - / Lt :- as _- - ' if -- �' \ / \ / \/ � 4 B d " / = - - z :0: GEOTEXTILE co ' SEC A ® A ` \ \ // Air •� ��'�r� FILTER FABRIC /j�� EROSION CONTROL ,,,, v i „ \ /\ / / / , EROSION CONTROL - - ` ' , , - 1 - - 8" ® STRAWBALES FILTER FABRIC - / ' • - - c - 9 s TYPICAL LANDSCAPE TYPICAL s NOTE O ROUGH G RADE t AC PAVEMEN i , , . it4 :4".. --"--' �Q _ , ti – 4 t If (7 4i h 0.33 CEMENT CONCRETE CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 PSI MIN (CLASS B) 3 1/2 SLUMP (MAX / / /� / / /� / / / // // " 20' MIN COMP DEPTH GRANULAR. SURFACING BASE .COURSE \ ; „ sl. ■ �s ' 2, CURBS ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT OR SIDEWALK TO HAVE EXPANSION \/i >` ' \ '` '`'\ ` Q 95% ` � AND /OR CONTRACTION JOINTS TO MATCH EXISTING PATTERNS. `/ COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95% ( sz• WRAP GRATE , 3. 3/8” EX PANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT 45' MAXIMUM SPACING, IN DIRECTION. W /GEOTEXTILE • _ P s SIDES OF CATCH BASINS, AT TOPS OF DRIVEWAYS, AND ALL CHANGE N EROSION CONTROL i ta SIDEWALK SECTION . t- 1 1/2" CUT JOINTS TO BE PLACED AT 15' MAXIMUM SPACING. FILTER FABRIC .40 PROT 4. COMPACT SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATED TO 95% OF MAX DRY DENSITY. CATCH BASIN � ff } o INE Ly ,� /� x ' . ' 4110P ` = 5, CURB TO BE BRUSH FINISHED. NOTE: STRAWBALES TO BE BOUND .4....c?, . ' - , WITH WIRE OR NYLON T CH BASIN OREGON . s CONCRETE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB TYPICAL CA o� �, 13 � it CAST IN PLACE INLET SILT BARRIER �R�L i �"� ��►R NJ- ,i,<, APPROACH SUBJE TO AGENCY REVIEW D , gL NTS NTS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NTS - - • - : :::::: M DC S CALE H• I - 20 W EROSION- CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN FOR: v: N /A_ W S DATE: M AY 1994 J ` CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLA NNERS ° ° w z 205 E. I im ST., SUITE LL_I, VANC OUVE R, WA 98 660 (206) 695 -3488 W t- IN .THE. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CHECKED: RDB JOB NO.: 931269 > - - cn t_ _ _ \ - 'N . a ° a ° , 6" tl i , \ e 4 — I.-- --H L ■ ° _ - :. , CONNECT TO EXIST WATER e '•' =' METER. VERIFY METER OPERATION .. 4 , OR REPLACE. VERIFY SIZE IS AT Q \ LEAST 1 ". REPLACE IF NEEDED VI • . .4 if .......... — , ,, \ \ \ �' ) \ '' � � 4 ° '° RESILIENT SEATED NW NATURAL\GAS CO. ` EXTG GROUND TOP VIEW SHUTOFF VALVES - \ - 1 - 15 FURN /IN$T LL I" LINE \ \ �� TRENCH BACKFILL PER (2 REQ'D) ,� AND APPURTENANCES. CONNECT \ , - -' \ PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 1 170 EXISTIN L INK. (DIA UNKNOWN) \ GEOTEXTILE TYPAR 3341, G I '� ;,,1°_, � / Q � v ` �- -_ -- 224 EXXON GTFI40 EX OR PROJECT / TEST CO X \ \ �\ -' � � \ FINISHED GRADE / E COCKS // 46()\\ 11 \ \ \\ �,- \ APPROVED EQUIVALENT \ (4 REQ'D) 3� \/ _ ` \ .._ -- _ - 1 1 \\ 7 % 1 TYPIC ° ° ° ° ,, ° o o / r „avail ` °) , ` ` � \ \ CAUTION! 1 ` ROAD SECTION ° 0 ° ° ° / ; ;, ^ �', WI v < BURIED CABLES \ ° ° ° ° �� SAW CUT EXTG Ate PAVED '%'-lil 111.112 1 I ' IDEWALK. MEET 8 �u4 TCH \\ I� ack ALONG BACK OF \ �, \ �i Q -- '' ` 7 \ SIDEWALK (ODOT TO COMPACTED NATIVE -----PA/ / \ \ \ \ / � \/ UNIONS IDEWALK. NEW CONC SIDEWALK. - 1 i LOCA ) \ \ • o , \/ (2 REQ D1 MATERIAL 95/° \\ \ \ \\ \ 2" PERFORATED / ° ° ° ° ° // GRAVEL PLASTIC OR CEMENT `. \ � >` iii,_- INS ALL OSHD /TUALiTIN- STORM DRAIN PIPE / ° i METER BOX `` VAL EY WATER DST. APPRO I ° ° _ ° \ 12" MIN 1 i " " ., - �,i ° °° ° �, - \ 1101°n%1406''041 ��o mo o o� g °g ° 0 0 0 0 00�o o / �• BA CKR OW PREVENTOR. / ° ° ° ° o / VARIES 0 o O • S VI EW o 0� 6 o ° °0 *O\ \/ CONNECT TO EXTG E TG CO \� \\ J. "At* (I DCVA� 1.25 xl REDUCER I, , - z /\ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° � O / • / \/ \� \/ \/ >/// \/ \\� ` � �. -- ° ° \ / 6" MAXIMUM / /////////\// \ IE 208.12_ \ I i o /� SAN SP IE 'aO8 35± t / ° \ / j 1/ \ \ ° ° o ° ° ° /� # 4 COARSE AGGREGATE EXTG / �j \ 2" METER � I i>( RELOCATE EXIST \ \ 0 ° ° ° ° o ° \ \ (DRAIN ROCK) NOTE- ' �, \ O VERHEAD ELECT , APPROVED DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY TO LAY HORIZONTAL WITH GROUND INSTALL STORM MH `\ Q` �� °'/t E MOUSH 8 DISPOSE I/� ■ e \ I� / j \ / OR AS APPROVED c, , , OF EXTG CONC ` \ III \ \ POLE $ TEL PED \ \ \ \ \ \� \ - DESIGNED FOR BACK SIPHONAGE AND BACK PRESSURE 12" IE 205.2 OUT \ 4,�p�,''�� `�o. PAD 8 POSTS , ( • \ BEHIND CURB (BY OTHERS) 12" LANDSCAPING HOSE BI - TEST COCKS TO EITHER FACE OUTWARDS OR UPWARDS FROM ASSEMBLY. ` ■ 10" IE 205.4 IN •� �- N � r � -� 4 TOP 210 2± C:)_„>>' - I s ' II \ TER AND APPURT- - THOROUGHLY FLUSH LINES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER. ' / I \ \ afi i 2�;s,-,_ I* $ \ ; q 4 x \ EXTG SAN MH B3 -5A \ LO 12" - THE DCVA MAY BE INSTALLED ABOVE OR BELOW THE GROUND PROVIDED ALL CLEARANCES ARE MET . 0 p 4 - S p �r s. - - _ _ _ / - DO NOT INSTALL IN AN AREA SUBJECT TO FLOODING. S i , ;;-..s, 1 ' � -� /� z„ M � ° ' ' - �_ t ___ _ `\ 2 0 6 ( � _ \ o • • IE 209.314, S =o Or /FTI I — -�) DIA IE 203.58 (IN) S ') O , i RD I �— __ _ - MUST BE PROTECTED FROM FREEZING CONDITIONS. i I , r CONNECT TO EXTG 0 \.,F \ c- ) � r r� I �Y I r — I - - - -__ \\ �� I PIPE - -THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE A STATE APPROVED MODEL. STORM CATCH BASIN/ 6 r III CO r w \ I _ - A PLUMBING PERMIT IS REQUIRED- PLEASE CONTACT YOUR LOCAL PLUMBING PERMIT CENTER MANHOLE , ITYP 3 PLCS) / 1 1 PERFORATED STORM ' / _ MUST BE TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION AND YEARLY THEREAFTER BY A STATE CERTIFIED 12" IE 201.4 IN ` Q i N 12 IE 208.6 OUifi ` 3 DEMOLISH EX S DISPO .E 11 , V BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TESTER. TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SENT TO THE CITY OF TIGARD WATER '' IE 201.2 OUT $ , / I G „ 1 \ V OF EXIST EXTRUD D , 1 - -- SEWER PIPE D E T A I L TOP 205.0± Y / ' ti� o • o l RD __CUR AND A.C. -- �L DEPARTMENT ,, ' N ' 1 �� PAVIN 1 b 1 1 1 Q NTS 6 (BELOW GROUND INSTALLATION) -?' i' ° � , RD C•] , 13' 1 5' l - � ' 1 c i STANDARD DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY �- , 1 ,, - I � ; �., 2" AND SMALLER . o 1 F F 2 16.0 _ --- , NTS Z 1 1 J - , ' i v i ^ 1r, 1 y 1 x RD EXTG 1 � r' I'�' ►'•i % ! )' / i I STANDARD EXTRUDED CHEVRON 1 / r / �` it r"� (� I CEMENT CONCRETE 34' STATION ` IE 210. l ' , I i 1 i ; CURB : 1 / � �) 1 ' S" m I. NOTE GRA TE SIZE: 1 / 1 4 — ( �� j J - / CAST IRON - 18"i24" ' " CAST STEEL - 20 "x24" k o I 214.0 f 1 1 r i �c _ RD 4' S6 oP /FT '. ` t 1 1� (� it 2. USE RISER TO ACHIEVE ' x M --� -- -- / 1 : 6 „ i FLOW � A o A o REQUIRED HEIGHT 1 1 411 OIL 8 GREASE SEPARATOR TO . NF rt�� , RD • 1.-------------_, j) —�- - . (7 6 MAXIMUM) • / E 1 ." ��. �Q� • .. .00= 1' /PT ME • - - • I � 1 j 1 79.4 = M � - �. _ OF BLDG PER MECH PLAN ,_ / ' 'u► 12 " p F R �F\ _ �' � _ I ( ( i W �/,f o 3. INSTALL TRAP (SEE DETAIL) BE INSTALLED WITHIN 5.0 1 s'0 off : TpE 1 f a \ 0 30" (PIPE INC. MODEL 4484G, IOOOgaI 1�, IE 211.91 ) NI I — ) 10" ���■� OR EQUAL) f2" IE 211.7 OUT I /1 o(( N \ � Q ooa ca O° Q 1 O k . r r GRATE 214.68` "� (�TT * _ / \ / \ / / \ / /j � p O a f p ,.... m TOP GRATE .,.,,_ ,\ �\ \� \/ \ a c d SITE PLAN - „ tea / / � IE 212.18 \ �� 1 \ j / \ \ j / � \ / \ \/ 0 0 0 0 o o D • / / ° °� I — 1 \ -1l-I ---_ \ \ \ \ - `\ /\\//\/\ 34„ L. \ / \/ 1 - / Il ` RISE ____i_ , I I . , li o � I LI _ ,. i t/ ,/ , EXTRUDED CU RB DETAIL TOP �� NTS I \ 1 c? 1 - —_ ,T 1 1 w I 1 t = o _ v J r `� / / Y 7 ARKI EXIS OVER AD Z (/ ''/ _ F,- _ A ,� BIL, BOAR SIGN I 1 „= '' 1 1 „ %„ a cu ' 11 11 d- II 11 M / ” /, 0 Z 1 e co 1 i` - 1 • 1 F-- . - , X N. o Q (V 1 1 111 I SECTION A -A SECTION B -B i CATCH BASIN DETAIL NTS D 2" 6" 0 . - ►. NOTE: TRAP TO BE MADE OF 22 GA GALVANIZED SHEET METAL 1 ALL JOINTS TO BE SEAMED AND SOLDERED ALL LONGITUDINAL JOINTS TO BE RIVETED DIMENSION "D" IS NOMINAL DIAMETER OF - - OUTLET PIPE NOTE: TYPE 60A TRAP MAY BE SUBSTITUTED WITH 90° PVC ELBOW TYPE TRAP \ PROF Scale 1" = 20' G INE :$ /,,,. TYPE 60A TRAP DETAIL - 20 10 0 20 40 80 10,319 1 1 NTS • ,D, G 1 ?� OREON ¶ / 9.f ° PRE L I M I NARY - 0 - 7.k 13 � 6 c - - rtici SUBJECT TO AGENCY REVIEW I QL P`F` NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR: D ESIGNED: MDC SCALE V: N/A SHEET HCDPPEIR & FDENN1S z ; . DRAWN: JEF /DPS DATE: MAY 1994 z r CONSULTING ENGINEERS PLANNERS - IN T CITY OF TIGARD OREGON 205 E. II ST.. SUITE LLI VANCOUVER, WA 98660 <206) 695 -3488 CHECKED: RDB JOB NO.: 931269 > 0 Q _. a J er - - - - - - i i