Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
MLP1995-00016
• • CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION APPLICATION: The applicant requests Minor Land Partition for a .49 acre parcel to create three (3) lots of 6,708, 6,000 and 4,829 square feet; and a Tract A for private street purposes. Zone: Multiple Family Residential (R -12). Location: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, Tax Lot 3400). SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to the following Conditions of Approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE PARTITION PLAT MAP THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent property. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division. 2. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Hall Blvd. or SW Spruce Street, or both. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work and discharge runoff within the right -of -way of SW Hall Blvd. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 4. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on a City standard form for the common driveway and associated drainage. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 1 • • 5. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 6. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Three (3) mylar copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. Copy of recorded boundary survey for site. C. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05) Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. D. The partition plat shall include a note prohibiting direct vehicular access to SW Hall Boulevard from Lot 3. 7. The applicant shall pay a fee in -lieu of an on -site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 8. Provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat; or if not recorded with Washington County but has been approved by the City • of Tigard the applicant shall have 30 days after recording with Washington County to submit the copy. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 2 • • SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement 1. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall: (a) Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and (b) Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. 2. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. SECTION 18.160.180 Bond 1. As required by Section 18.160.170, the applicant shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: (a) An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; (b) A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or (c) Cash. 2. The applicant shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. 3. The applicant shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 3 • • 18.164.150 Installation: Prerequisite /Permit Fee 1. No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. 18.164.200 Engineer's Certification Required 1. The applicant's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the public works improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT Background: This site has been zoned R -12 since the site was annexed to the City in April of 1987. A previous Minor Land Partition was approved for this site in 1989. At that time two new lots were partitioned at both corners of the property along the SW Spruce Street frontage. Vicinity Information: The site is adjoined by areas which are zoned for residential use. Much of this area is developed with detached single - family residences. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 4 • • • Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is approximately .49 acres or 21,344 square feet in size and roughly rectangular with a "flag lot" type access extension of approximately 34 feet in width to SW Spruce Street. The applicant proposes to partition the parcel into three lots for development of single family residences. Other Staff Comments The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and provided the following findings: FINDINGS: 1. Streets: Access is provided by a common driveway to SW Spruce Street; no access to SW Hall Blvd. is proposed. The frontage along SW Spruce Street, a local street, has existing right -of -way of 60 feet in width. The street is improved with an 18.5 foot paved width, but without curbs or sidewalks. SW Hall Blvd. is a major collector under ODOT jurisdiction. The frontage is improved with only a drainage ditch. Additional right -of -way to increase the width from centerline to 45 feet was provided by a previous partition. This parcel is subject to an agreement waiving the property owner's right to oppose a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Spruce Street and SW Hall Blvd. The parcels resulting from this partition should be subject to a similar agreement. 2. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service is provided by extending a public line from the existing sewer in SW Spruce Street along the common driveway. 3. Storm Sewer: The applicant proposes to provide storm drainage by installing a private line from the common driveway to a ditch along SW Hall Blvd. This will require a permit from ODOT. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 5 ID • Although the applicant has proposed to provide surface water treatment by a public detention pond along the north end of Lot 3, a fee in -lieu of the facility should be required. The applicant has also not demonstrated that storm water from Lots 1 and 2 will drain to a public system. The pond as proposed does not meet design standards and would place an unreasonable maintenance burden upon the City because of the small size of the site and difficulty of access. Agency Comments: The Building Department reviewed this application and stated that the proposed utility plan does not adequately demonstrate how storm drainage will be directed towards a public storm sewer system for Lots 1 and 2. The applicant shall demonstrate this prior to recordation of the preliminary plat. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Minor Land Partition Section 18.162.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Minor Land Partition: 1. The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; 3. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; 4. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title; and 5. All proposed improvements meet city and applicable agency standards (Ord. 89 -06; Ord. 83 - 52). Each of the proposed parcels would exceed the 3,050 square foot minimum. The proposed parcels comply with the R -12 Zoning District. The parcels as proposed would allow the development of one (1) residential dwelling unit for Lots 1 and 2 and up to two (2) dwelling units for Lot 3. The development as proposed does not exceed the maximum residential density allowed under Chapter 18.92 for a .49 acre R -12 property. The site yields the opportunity to develop up to five (5) dwelling units after deduction of street right -of -way. Upon completion of the appeal period the development will have complied with the statutory requirements of the City of Tigard for development review as required by Criteria #2. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 6 • • Adequate public facilities are available or have been required to be provided to serve this site as set forth in Sections 18.164.030 (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164,100 (Storm Drain) as required by Criteria #3 as reviewed within the Engineering Departments comments contained elsewhere within this report. Prior to recordation of the preliminary plat the roof and site drainage for the new residences will be directed to a public facility. The new parcels do not exceed a two and one half to one length to depth ratio. The R -12 Zoning District does not have an average width requirement. For these reasons. the proposed parcel configurations conform with size and dimensional requirements of the R- 12 Zoning District as required by Criteria #4. All proposed improvements will comply with City and applicable agency standards in satisfaction with Criteria #5 as reviewed through the Building Permit Plan Check process. Two of the newly created parcels comply with the Basic Solar Access requirements because the north - south lot dimension exceeds 90 feet in length. The remaining parcel may be exempted from compliance with the Basic Standard due to numerous existing development constraints. The development of structures on all three of the parcels will require compliance with Solar Balance Point Standards of the Community Development Code. Section 18.162.050 contains the following provisions for lots created through the partition process: A. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. B. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. C. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. D. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. E. Front Yard Determination on flag lots: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to mavimize separation from existing structures. F. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be r €: auired to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 7 • S G. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. H. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. I. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. J. Where landfill andlor development is allowed within or adjacent to the one - hundred -year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan. Criteria A, B, C, and D are satisfied. The parcels will exceed the area requirement of 3,050 square feet set forth within the R -12 Zoning District. Each newly created parcel would have in excess of 15 feet of direct frontage on a private street in satisfaction of the lot frontage requirement in Criteria C. Standards for setbacks, landscaping and clear vision requirements will be reviewed at the time of Building Permit Plan Check Review in satisfaction of Criteria D. Criteria E and F have been addressed because the proposed lots will each have in excess of 15 feet of frontage to the proposed private street tract. For this reason a flag lot setback determination is not necessary and flag lot access screening is not required. Through the Building Permit Plan Check Review fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards thereby satisfying Criteria G. Criteria H which requires reciprocal access maintenance agreement to maintain the proposed joint access easement has been required as a Condition of Approval. Criteria I is satisfied through the requirement for construction of 20 foot wide private street to serve the three parcels. Criteria J has been met because the parcel is not located within the 100 -year flood plain, or in areas with slopes exceeding 25 percent. Because the site does not adjoin the 100 -year flood plain dedication of areas for pathway purposes is not applicable. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 8 • • SECTION IV. PROCEDURE 1 • Notice: No ice was •ub ished in - news•a•er •osted at Ci Hall and mailed o: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON January 1 6 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. A eal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section -113.32_222A1 and Section 18.32_370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. January 16 1996. 4 . uestions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Division (639 - 4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 �. 14 ._, All• APPROVED BY: Mark Roberts 1/4/96 DATE • Associate Planner NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 9 • • _____, . , 1 ,. , 1. r-- T9. • '80.16 119.16 • � �� 0 L OT ' . 45 9 5F = 11816 RG�OR � � In I -} � I o LOT I . 6QOY 5F I _ v rbl f 0.'1 - I %o o • fd? effi il I WT3 6 8 • I � 9 a III / FF • 18.e..: .; E .,, , . I 1 ci) . r ne eo I • rn.9z/ . � I I �° , V I f-7.3.61 , 4 - — 119.701 179 ' :d0y 3 i Cl. - Fad$T ,, 5I e1rL4L Q • I I CC ` ,fig .1 C / ' u FROvIC- STRAW SAL= 54. <. /ER V _: 'E,3 / 47 ENO CF SEC1;"'ENT FENCE. , 1 7 SE= D_ TAIL Si-J==7 T 6 —► 0 26 ;Vbiel\ ne9 �y -' ae INSTALL 50'_X 25' GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. j,W, SPRUCE ST. I— 5E= f ETA1L 51-IEET 6, _U PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP T MLP95 -0016 . • r • or,si, , cl------ 1 ST C C 1 a. PINE ST Pi CD 0 CM SITE - - - - », \ \\ ' , C C ''UCE ST C SF (T 3 L - Cl. Q MIN , 7:3 6.1. cc3 t - V J ______________________ P . I , , 0 - ›, 6,,,,,_ mil _ :-1-• c-17, MIN - o 116. Vicinity Map A MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION ':xe '.o s ran scam A • • EXHIBIT A CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF DECISION MINOR LAND PARTITION MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION APPLICATION: The applicant requests Minor Land Partition for a .49 acre parcel to create three (3) lots of 6,708, 6,000 and 4,829 square feet; and a Tract A for private street purposes. Zone: Multiple Family Residential (R -12). Location: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 . 35AD, Tax Lot 3400). SECTION I - DECISION: Notice is hereby given that the Planning Director for the City of Tigard has APPROVED the above request subject to the following Conditions of Approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section II. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE PARTITION PLAT MAP THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent property. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division. 2. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Hall Blvd. or SW Spruce Street, or both. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 3. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work and discharge runoff within the right -of -way of SW Hall Blvd. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. 4. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on a City standard form for the common driveway and associated drainage. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 1 • • 5. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction . drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 6. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Three (3) mylar copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. Copy of recorded boundary survey for site. C. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05) Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. D. The partition plat shall include a note prohibiting direct vehicular access to SW Hall Boulevard from Lot 3. 7. The applicant shall pay a fee in -lieu of an on -site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-47. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 8. Provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat; or if not recorded with Washington County but has been approved by the City of Tigard the applicant shall have 30 days after recording with Washington County to submit the copy. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE; THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 2 • • SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement 1. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall: (a) Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and (b) Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. 2. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. SECTION 18.160.180 Bond 1. As required by Section 18.160.170, the applicant shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: (a) An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; (b) A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or (c) Cash. 2. The applicant shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. 3. The applicant shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 3 • • 18.164.150 Installation: Prerequisite /Permit Fee 1. No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. 18.164.200 Engineer's Certification Required 1. The applicant's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the public works improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. THIS APPROVAL IS VALID IF EXERCISED WITHIN EIGHTEEN MONTHS OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL DECISION. SECTION II. FINDINGS OF FACT Background: This site has been zoned R -12 since the site was annexed to the City in April of 1987. A previous Minor Land Partition was approved for this site in 1989. At that time two new lots were partitioned at both corners of the property along the SW Spruce Street frontage. Vicinity Information: The site is adjoined by areas which are zoned for residential use. Much of this area is developed with detached single - family residences. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 4 • • • Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is approximately .49 acres or 21,344 square feet in size and roughly rectangular with a "flag lot" type access extension of approximately 34 feet in width to SW Spruce Street. The applicant proposes to partition the parcel into three lots for development of single family residences. Other Staff Comments The Engineering Department has reviewed this application and provided the following findings: FINDINGS: 1. Streets: Access is provided by a common driveway to SW Spruce Street; no access to SW Hall Blvd. is proposed. The frontage along. SW Spruce Street, a local street, has existing right -of -way of 60 feet in width. The street is improved with an 18.5 foot paved width, but without curbs or sidewalks. SW Hall Blvd. is a major collector under ODOT jurisdiction. The frontage is improved with only a drainage ditch. Additional right -of -way to increase the width from centerline to 45 feet was provided by a previous partition. This parcel is subject to an agreement waiving the property owner's right to oppose a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Spruce Street and SW Hall Blvd. The parcels resulting from this partition should be subject to a similar agreement. 2. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service is provided by extending a public line from the existing sewer in SW Spruce Street along the common driveway. 3. Storm Sewer: The applicant proposes to provide storm drainage by installing a private line from the common driveway to a ditch along SW Hall Blvd. This will require a permit from ODOT. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 5 • • • . Although the applicant has proposed to provide surface water treatment by a public detention pond along the north end of Lot 3, a fee in -lieu of the facility should be required. The applicant has also not demonstrated that storm water from Lots 1 and 2 will drain to a public system. The pond as proposed does not meet design standards and would place an unreasonable maintenance burden upon the City because of the small size of the site and difficulty of access. Agency Comments: The Building Department reviewed this application and stated that the proposed utility plan does not adequately demonstrate how storm drainage will be directed towards a public storm sewer system for Lots 1 and 2. The applicant shall demonstrate this prior to recordation of the preliminary plat. No other comments have been received. SECTION III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Minor Land Partition Section 18.162.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Minor Land Partition: 1. The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan; 2. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations; 3. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal; 4. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title; and 5. All proposed improvements meet city and applicable agency standards (Ord. 89 -06; Ord. 83 -52). Each of the proposed parcels would exceed the 3,050 square foot minimum. The proposed parcels comply with the R -12 Zoning District. The parcels as proposed would allow the development of one (1) residential dwelling unit for Lots 1 and 2 and up to two (2) dwelling units for Lot 3. The development as proposed does not exceed the maximum residential density allowed under Chapter 18.92 for a .49 acre R -12 property. The site yields the opportunity to develop up to five (5) dwelling units after deduction of street right -of -way. Upon completion of the appeal period the development will have complied with the statutory requirements of the City of Tigard for development review as required by Criteria #2. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 6 • Adequate public facilities are available or have been required to be provided to serve this site as set forth in Sections 18.164.030 (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drain) as required by Criteria #3 as reviewed within the Engineering Departments comments contained elsewhere within this report. Prior to recordation of the preliminary plat the roof and site drainage for the new residences will be directed to a public facility. The new parcels do not exceed a two and one half to one length to depth ratio. The R -12 Zoning District does not have an average width requirement. For these reasons the proposed parcel configurations conform with size and dimensional requirements of the R- 12 Zoning District as required by Criteria #4. All proposed improvements will comply with City and applicable agency standards in satisfaction with Criteria #5 as reviewed through the Building Permit Plan Check process. Two of the newly created parcels comply with the Basic Solar Access requirements because the north - south lot dimension exceeds 90 feet in length. The remaining parcel may be exempted from compliance with the Basic Standard due to numerous existing development constraints. The development of structures on all three of the parcels will require compliance with Solar Balance Point Standards of the Community Development Code. Section 18.162.050 contains the following provisions for lots created through the partition process: A. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement of the applicable zoning district. B. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation. C. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right -of -way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access easement. D. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. E. Front Yard Determination on flag lots: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures. F. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 7 • • G. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire fighting capabilities. H. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map. I. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation. J. Where landfill andlor development is allowed within or adjacent to the one - hundred -year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain. This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrianlbicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrianlbicycle pathway plan. Criteria A, B, C, and D are satisfied. The parcels will exceed the area requirement of 3,050 square feet set forth within the R -12 Zoning District. Each newly created parcel would have in excess of 15 feet of direct frontage on a private street in satisfaction of the lot frontage requirement in Criteria C. Standards for setbacks, landscaping and clear vision requirements will be reviewed at the time of Building Permit Plan Check Review in satisfaction of Criteria D. Criteria E and F have been addressed because the proposed lots will each have in excess of 15 feet of frontage to the proposed private street tract. For this reason a flag lot setback determination is not necessary and flag lot access screening is not required. Through the Building Permit Plan Check Review fire hydrants shall be consistent with Uniform Fire Code standards thereby satisfying Criteria G. Criteria H which requires reciprocal access maintenance agreement to maintain the proposed joint access easement has been required as a Condition of Approval. Criteria I is satisfied through the requirement for construction of 20 foot wide private street to serve the three parcels. Criteria J has been met because the parcel is not located within the 100 -year flood plain, or in areas with slopes exceeding 25 percent. Because the site does not adjoin the 100 -year flood plain dedication of areas for pathway purposes is not applicable. NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 8 • • . SECTION IV. PROCEDURE 1. Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper. posted at City Hall and mailed to: XX The applicant and owners XX Owners of record within the required distance XX Affected government agencies • 2. Final Decision: THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON January 16. 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. 3. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is given and sent. Appeal fee schedule and forms are available at Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 p.m. January 16, 1996. 4. Questions: If you have questions, please call City of Tigard Planning Division (639 - 4171), City of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 T Rdtb4 — '" 1/4/96 APPROVED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Associate Planner NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 95 -0016 - DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 9 • • r / TB. • 180.16 A I1s16 n I . LOT 4,879 Sr / 1 1816 FLOOR 1 � � ♦ / f ,e ,{119{ Lot I • eem+� / I Illy • liEj i r th o U • ° I 1 ; ' for 3. 6118 Q. ' ,' I I. „E' , W i 1[ 4 FF tam .1801 r I FF • 118 • /8 0.12 �p �./ I ���� v I I FF • na.61 I � � I :.,� ,'� ns9s� r a' ne.'m� J 11 �� Z �. G t7 me ; 119.92 �_ . _ b 4 ' _ 119.81 / , Z 180 n9.9r a i o 0 J I .. ,! 18003 I :. V a. • • E XST RESDENTL4L ' Q 4 / EXIST RESIDENTIAL .1. CC Q ;� _ a 1 • PROVIDE STRAW BALE BAR IER ' � AT END OF SEDIMENT FENCE. ■ LJ SEE DETAIL 51-IEET 6 UMW NM Ira , .� 1i '1 • • O 0 89 % l 1 889 INS ' 50'_ < 25' GRA . . • • . coN,�fRUCT1ON ENTRANCE. . S.',��� • SPRUCE ST. I 5E ' RETAIL. SHEET 6 1 / _ PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP 11 MLP95 -0016 . r • f� ( I / ST C C J r PINE ST PI 8 ":UCE ST SF )[ E i• 1111111 i= o Z C.) Vicinity Map n ML,P 95 -0016 Note: �6�m� (N DAMS PARTITION MLP�5 III (j /) �a !• 7T 16135AD -02200 1 S135AD -01900 EXH 1 T. ARNSBERG, PAUL B 8818 SW SPRUCE • TIGARD, OR 97223 • 1S135AD -01102 1S135AD -00901 BARNES, MARK S BENNETT, BRIAN S AND PATRICE D 8815 SW SPRUCE ST 10675 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 1S135AD -02900 1S135AD -01200 BURGHARDT, THOMAS J & AMY K CROUCH, THELMA C ESTATE 10830 SW HALL BLVD Go DAVIS EUGENE L AND VIVIAN TIGARD, OR 97223 13095 SW HENRY BEAVERTON, OR 97005 1S135AD -01103 15135AD -03400 DAVIS, EUGE DAVIS, GENE L 13095 N NRY ST 13095 SW HENRY ERTON, OR 97005 BEAVERTON, OR 97005 1S135AA -03400 1S135AD -00500 DORTLAND, SHERRY A HIRNING, DOROTHY AND 10580 SW HALL BLVD SARGEANT, SHARON TIGARD, OR 97223 6325 SW 90TH PORTLAND, OR 97223 1 S 135AD -00400 1 S 135AD -00900 HOGREFE, OWEN & MARILYN JUVE, ALICE SARAH 13045 SW HEATHER CT 10655 SW HALL BLVD BEAVERTON, OR 97005 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1 S 135AD -02300 1 S 135AD -02000 LEE, VANCE R MILLER, LEE W AND D 10915 SW HALL BLVD 8808 SW S TIGARD, OR 97223 ND, OR 97223 1 S 135AD -02001 1 S 135AD -01100 MILLER, LEE W JR DORIS E MOON, BRETT A & SHERRIE A 8808 SW SPRUCE 8807 SW SPRUCE PORTLAND, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 1S135AD -03500 1S135AD -02101 RAYBORN, HOWARD L AND KATHY L SCHWARZ, G ROBERT & LORETTA J 17645 SW JURGENS RD 1395 SKYE PARKWAY TUALATIN, OR 97062 WEST LINN, OR 97068 1 S 135AD -00301 1S1 35AD -03300 TENLY PROPERTIES CORP TENLY PROPERTIES CORP Go FRALEY, DONALD L & SHIRLEY PO BOX 414 549 NW QUEENS CT E HILLSBORO, OR 97124 HILLSBORO, OR 97124 6141,g5_( LIZ) 90 . EXHIBIT B 16135AD -00300 1S135AD -02100 WALKER, DOUGLAS B AND WEISS, HENRY K BONNIE L ROSEMARIE G 7505 SW CRESTVIEW ST 8880 SW 68TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1S135AA -03600 WRIGHT, JOHN RICHARD/TRACY ILE 10575 SW HALL TIGARD, OR 97223 • • City of Tigard, Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly swom /affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (cheer box above. if applUeabbl (check appropriate box below) (Enter Public Hearing Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council 117 That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Check box above. M applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Chad( box above, If applicable} (check appropriate box below} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE /NOTICE OF DECISION /NO CE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is ttached, marked Exhibit " ", wa / �. iled to e - c • - person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached li (s), marked Exhibit "B", • ,e / �•• . �� .�� �1.,� 199 , and deposited in the Un' ed States t - • on thz " • . ay of �,�I�1�J 199 , postage prepaid. ' Fdr 414.. - repared Notice f Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the / t r i tay of jAtitIK._, 19 vD F OFICIAL SEAL DIANE JELDERKS NOTARY Y PUBLIC-OREGON N N�V1� rkyc ICI Lj `%:.® COMMISSION NO. 046142 NOTA PUBLIC O O EGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 My Commission Expi e . 7 1 7FILE NI'O.a NAME(S): ayZ%!^ red)r} CASE NO.(S): • -Q 9,�0()l L TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: • alpt , J PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF TIGARD FILE NO: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95 -0016 FILE TITLE: DAVIS PARTITION APPLICANT: Gene Davis OWNER: Same 13095 SW Henry Street Beaverton, OR 97005 (503) 646 -6101 REQUEST: A request to partition one existing .49 acre lot into three (3) lots of 6,708, 6000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Multiple - Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY X STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639 -4171 x317 MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS OW 14-ti ( .14,1 G317. 1 9�� Tyr OF Ttc��oa, OREGON : . ;':.,: • �� CITY OP TIGARD 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tigard, Oregon 97223 - ( 503) 639417 � LP as DO / 6 CASE NO. OTHER CASE NO'S: • RECEIPT NO. ,_ — 1 APPLICATION A CEPT D BY _ • DATEt l l / 3 q/ • Application elements subml:tted: 1. GENERAL INFORMATION � �35 e/(A) Application form (1) PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATI �( Owner's signature /written S ! - ' . � � � authorizatio>a� TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. � - _ 2 - `O , ` . 1., 00 /(C) Title transfer , instrument (1) • S 1 e (D) Assessor's map (1) SITE SIZE _ 27. check list) ADDRESS OWNER/DEED HOLDER* PHONE , ✓ (E) Plot plan (pre 64G-6101 y (F) Applicant's statement ADDRESS ._109 , Henry Sfy (pre -app check list) • ZIP 97005 CITY APPLICANT r •- 11 ADORES S 13095 S. VV. Henr St. PHONE 64,_ 66661 1 OR ZIP 970 ✓(H) Filing fee 02 CITY Beaverton 07 �— *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization DATE�T INED T COMPLETE: ent of the owne r. with from the owner or The () must .sign this authorization. two or FZNAJ. DECISION DEADLINE: application in the space provided on page application. submit a written authorization with this app GOrlP. LAN /ZoNF. Pg�IGNATION: 2. PR OPOSAL SU MMARY al. �_,ZV E-7-0.54.-- � The owners of record of the sub lect property N.14‘.0. Number �-- • request permission to divide tot area into 3 containing 6000 Planning Director Approval Date: No. of parCe acres (or square 6708 SF , and 29 48 SE Final Approval Date: feet each Planning Engineering _ Recordation Date and Number: p519P/1 Revd: 3/88 OCT 27 '95 12:21 00000 PAGE.003 ! MINI) u l '-' • p y • _ ._._. _... ID P. • • conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered 3. List any variance, . ..... , as part of this application: 4. Applicants: o have a complete application you will need to ou mit.e tac m t nt s described ed in the attached information sheet at the time you 'bmit application. . 5. THE APPLICANT(S),SHALL CERTIFY THAT A. The above re uest does not violate tanro•ert strictions that may be attached to or im.osed u•on the sub a will exercise the rights • B. If the application is granted, the applicant anted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and gr royal. limitations of the app lot plan, are true;, and the C. All of the above exhibits herewith, and sm are based on this a pplicants •so acknowledge that any P chmenss, and ex permit issued, appl application, may be revoked if it is found that any such sta are false. D. The applicant has read the entire ners the application, includinR the policies and criteria, for approving and or denying the application. • �Q7ade✓�- 19 9� . DATED this _.y day of e h usband and wife) of the - object proper y• SIGNATURES of each owner ( �• Attorney ' ' Fac for Dr. Eugene Davis Jordan Andrew J p,. _ (KSL :pmlO 00000 PAGE.002 OCT 27 '95 12:20 00000 PAGE.003 • 0 a »i, + 3;'3+ :?3n i, ,.l. [;f�;.�' , l.. s,. a: '.:.tt s'` % , i:.j l i: 1•;Ir'• ; • 1' ':'�In.'" ,.3i, ..,:, +i3?iii' ! .h .1;3.. i...�'•, {l. `l'. V& M Consulting 'Engineers, Inc:` • 1000‘S*. Hampton'; Suite 123 ` Portland 'OR 97223 ; ;': Phone (503)63939561 Fax (5 03)639-4098 November 6, 1995 Mark Roberts Community Development Assistant Planner City of Tigard To whom it may concern, As engineering consultant to Dr. Gene L. Davis, we are submitting this application for a 3 lot partition as approved by the owner. Enclosed are all documents requested by the City of Tigard. The standards for feasibility concerning engineering and other disciplines are as follows: The owner of record, Gene L. Davis, of the subject property at 8753 S.W. Spruce St. in Tigard, wishes to partition his parcel. The existing parcel is 21,640 s.f and is zoned R -12, (12 units per acre) or minimum lot sizes of 3,000 s.f. Upon partition, the lot sizes will be 6,001s.f., 6,708 s.f. and 4,832 s.f meeting all zoning and lot setback requirements. Accompanying the 3 lots will be a private drive tract "A" and a water quality detention pond on tract "B," again meeting all requirements. The private drive opens on to Spruce St. with an upgraded concrete commercial type entrance with a cross width greater than the minimum requirement. Along the East side property line there will be constructed a 6 ft. sidewalk meeting ADA requirements. This will provide walking access from the back lots to the front of the street. There is no existing storm control on the property to date. We propose a storm improvement that will contain all impervious area runoff and channel it through a water quality detention structure. The flow under controlled release will outfall from this structure to an existing ditch at the north end of the property. This functioning ditch with proven directional flow will then route the accumulated flow to Ash creek. 900 ft. North of the parcel. We are currently working with ODOT for approval. The only utility improvement required by the City Engineer is to set a sanitary sewer manhole at the connection to our proposed line. There are existing utilities for development including fire protection. If there are any questions and concerns please contact me at the number found above. Sincerely, Brent Sanborn, E.I.T. Project Manager • • Legal Description Partition Plat Number Tract B A tract of land located in a portion of lot 6, Block 54, Metzger Acre Tracts, recorded in Book 2, Page 41, Washington County Deed Records, in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more specifically described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod and the northwest corner of lot 6 of said subdivision; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 126.00 feet to the to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 58.86 feet to the west right -of -way line of SW Hall Boulevard (County road 1165); thence along said right -of -way and a 1477.40 foot curve to the left, 15.06 feet; thence thence leaving said right -of -way S 90 °00'00" W, 60.16 feet; thence N 00 °00'00" W, 15.00 feet and the Point of Beginning. Said tract contains 895 square feet, more or Tess. . • 0 Legal Description Partition Plat Number Tract A A tract of land located in a portion of lot 6, Block 54, Metzger Acre Tracts, recorded in Book 2, Page 41, Washington County Deed Records, in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more specifically described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod and the northwest corner of lot 6 of said subdivision; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 63.00 feet ; thence S 00 °00'00" E, 76.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 90 °00'00" E, 63.00 feet, thence S 00 °00'00" E, 27.57 feet; S 89 °53'03" W, 15.79 feet; thence S 00 °01'25" E, 71.94 feet to the north right -of -way of SW Spruce Street (County road 947); thence along said right -of -way, S 89 °47'42" W, 34.85 feet; thence leaving said right -of -way, N 00 °03'44" W, 81.18 feet; thence S 89 °54'53" W, 12.24 feet; thence N 00 °00'00" W, 18.51 feet and the Point of Beginning. Said tract contains square feet, more or less. • Legal Description Partition Plat Number A parcel of land located in a portion of lot 6, Block 54, Metzger Acre Tracts, recorded in Book 2, Page 41, Washington County Deed Records, in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more specifically described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod and the northwest corner of lot 6 of said subdivision; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 184.86 feet to the west right -of- way line of SW Hall Boulevard (County road 1165); thence along said right -of -way and a 1477.40 foot curve to the left, 84.85 feet; thence S 00 °04'06" E, 19.82 feet; thence leaving said right -of -way, S 89 °53'03" W, 84.06 feet, thence S 00 °01'25" E, 71.94 feet to the north right -of -way of SW Spruce Street (County road 947); thence along said right -of -way, S 89 °47'42" W, 34.85 feet; thence leaving said right -of -way, N 00 °03'44" W, 81.18 feet; thence S 89 °54'53" W, 75.24 feet to a point on the west line of said lot 6; thence along said west line, N 00 °00'00" W, 95.30 feet and the Point of Beginning. Said parcel contains 0.79 acres, more or less. • Legal Description Partition Plat Number Lot 3 A parcel of land located in a portion of lot 6, Block 54, Metzger Acre Tracts, recorded in Book 2, Page 41, Washington County Deed Records, in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more specifically described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod and the northwest corner of lot 6 of said subdivision; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 126.00 feet to the to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 58.86 feet to the west right -of -way line of SW Hall Boulevard; thence along said right -of -way and a 1477.40 foot curve to the left, 84.85 feet; thence S 00 °04'06" E, 19.82 feet; thence leaving said right -of -way, S 89 °53'03" W, 68.27 feet, thence N 00 °00'00" W, 104.27 feet and the Point of Beginning. Said parcel contains 6708 square feet, more or Tess. 0 • Legal Description Partition Plat Number Lot 2 A parcel of land located in a portion of lot 6, Block 54, Metzger Acre Tracts, recorded in Book 2, Page 41, Washington County Deed Records, in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more specifically described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod and the northwest corner of lot 6 of said subdivision; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 63.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along said north line, 63.00 feet; thence S 00 °00'00" E, 76.70 feet; thence S 90 °00'00" W, 63.00 feet N 00 °00'00" W, 76.70 feet and the Point of Beginning. Said parcel contains 4829 square feet, more or less. • • Legal Description Partition Plat Number Lot 1 A parcel of land located in a portion of lot 6, Block 54, Metzger Acre Tracts, recorded in Book 2, Page 41, Washington County Deed Records, in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more specifically described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod and the northwest corner of lot 6 of said subdivision; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 63.00 feet; thence S 00 °00'00" E, 95.21 feet; thence S 89 °54'53" W, 63.00 feet to a point on the west line of said It 6; thence along said west line, N 00 °00'00" W, 95.30 feet and the Point of Beginning. Said parcel contains 6001 square feet, more or less. • • Legal Description Partition Plat Number Easement A parcel of land located in a portion of lot 6, Block 54, Metzger Acre Tracts, recorded in Book 2, Page 41, Washington County Deed Records, in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, more specifically described as follows: Commencing at a 5/8 inch iron rod and the northwest corner of lot 6 of said subdivision; thence N 90 °00'00" E, along the north line of said lot 6, 126.00 feet; thence S 00 °00'00" E, 15.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence N 90 °00'00" E, 15.00 feet; thence S 00 °00'00" E, 63.66 feet; thence S 00 °00'00" W, 15.00 feet; thence N 00 °00'00" W, 63.66 feet and the Point of Beginning. Said parcel contains 955 square feet, more or less. S1W ¶I'TLE C ONSUMER INFORMATION PREPARED FOR: BRENT 1 Date: 09/15/19-9-5- I . I. '1 \,; t A. • PREPARED BY: TRACY Customer Service & Nite Owl 671-0525 • This information has been furnished, et oitr mance without charge, in cOTjctToeC'e with the guidelines approved by the State of Oregon Insurance Co'nmiesionar. The Insurance Division cautions intern edi,riei that this Service is designed rc himeiit tha ultimate insured; it :diurminate ute only benetlting intaiTnediarce will not be 9irviiLted. 9edd eeriree mar be die continued. So <:nb lity ie assumed for any errere in ihie report- . . . Please return the favor by ordering title insurance and escrow serviette from Stewart Title. r • STEWART TITLE OF OREGON, INC. - CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPT. PHONE 671 -05251 NITEOWL 671 -0555 = M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y P R O F I L E = Washington County ************************************************** *** * * * * * * * *** * * * * * * * * * * *+F *** ** * * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * * * Reference Parcel #:1S224BC 14400 * * Parcel Number :R0985535 TRSQ:01S- 02W -24 -NW SW * * Owner :LAND DALE E & CHERIE IC * * CoOwner * * Site Address :20332 SW VIENNA CT ALOHA 97007 * * Mail Address :20332 SW VIENNA CT ALOHA OR 97007 * * Telephone :Owner Tenant * * = == * * *= * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * = .*.T,_ * * Transferred:05 /20/94 Loan Amount * * Document # :49253 Lender : * * Sale Price : Loan Type : * Deed Type :CR EST BY ENTIR Interest Rate: * * % Owned :100 Vesting Type :ESTATE BY ENTIRE * * * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * = =arr*.M= a * * Land :$25,200 Exempt Amount: * * Structure ;$96,510 Exempt Type : * * Other % Improved :79 * * Total :$121,710 Levy Code :05150 * * 94- 95Taxes:$1,857.76 School Dist :BEAVERTON * * R= * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * * * Map Grid:624 C5 Class Code:R14 * * Census :Tract 317.04 Block 5 * * NbrhdCd :SWA2 MillRate :15.2636 * * Sub /Plat:FARMINGTON WEST * * Land Use:1013 RES,IMPROVED * * Legal :LOT 147 FARMINGTON WEST #7 * * * * * * = ==sw.„, = * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * :***c= * Bedrooms :3 Lot Acres : Year Built :1979 * * Bathrooms :2.00 Lot SqFt : EffYearBlt :1979 * * Heat Method :FORCED BsmFin SF : Floor Cover:CARPET * * Pool : SsmUnfinSF: Foundation :CONCRETE FTG * * Appliances :YES Bldg SqFt :1,716 Roof Shape :GABLE * * Dishwasher : lstFlrSgFt :1,716 Roof Matl :COMP SHINGLE * * Hood Fan : UpperFlSF : InteriorMat:DRYWALL * Deck :YES Porch SqFt: Paving Matl:CONCRETE * * Garage Type :UNIMPROV Attic SciFt: Const Type:WD STUD \SHTG * * Garage SF :440 Deck SqFt :430 Ext Pinish :HORIZONTAL WD * ************************************************* ** * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** * ** *** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. A. STEWART TITLE OF OREGON, INC. - CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT PHONE 671 -0525; NITE OWL 671 -0535 - M E T R O S C A N P R O P E R T Y P R O F I L E = = Washington County * * * * ** * * * **** * ** * * * * ** * ** * *** !******************* * ** ** *** * * *,t * * * * *+t * * ***** **** * * * OWNERSHIP INFORMATION * * * * Reference Parcel #:1S135AD 03400 * * Parcel Number :R2010045 TRSQ:01S- 01W -35 -NE SE * * Owner :DAVIS GENE L * CoOwner * * —,Site Address :8753 SW SPRUCE ST TIGARD 97223 * * Mail Address :13095 SW HENRY ST BEAVERTON OR 97005 * * Telephone :Owner 503 -646 -6101 Tenant * * * * SALES AND LOAN INFORMATION * * * Transferred: Loan Amount : * * Document # : Lender * * Sale Price : Loan Type * * Deed Type Interest Rate: * * % Owned Vesting Type * * yp : * * ASSESSMENT AND TAX INFORMATION * * * * Land :$27,090 Exempt Amount: * * Structure : Exempt Type * * Other % Improved * * Total :$27,090 Levy Code :02381 * * 94- 95Taxes:$425.95 School Dist :TIGARD * * * * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION * * Map Grid:655 F2 Class Code: * * Census :Tract 309.00 Block 1 * * NbrhdCd :WSMZ MillRate :15.6392 * * Sub /Plat: * * Land Use;1QQ4 VACANT,RESIDENTIAL * * Legal :1990 -053 PARTITION PLAT, LOT 2, * * :ACRES .50 * * * * PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS * * * * * Bedrooms Lot Acres :.50 Year Built : * Bathrooms : Lot SqFt ;21,780 EffYearBlt : * * Heat Method: BsmFin SF : Floor Cover: * * Pool BsmUnfinSF; Foundation : * * Appliances : Bldg SqFt : Roof Shape : * * Dishwasher : lstFlrSgFt: Roof Matl : * * Hood Fan UpperFlSF : InteriorMat: * * Deck : Porch SqFt: Paving Matl: * * Garage Type: Attic SqFt: Conet Type: * * Garage SF : Deck SqFt : Ext Finish: * ************************************************* * * * *** * * * * ** * **** * * * * * * * *** * * ** The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. J i A .20 .4c 1 1 - 2C0 b ; j .1 A R 1\/.1 . 1 � 1K to 2 sn EAS7 24..2 <' . a) 400 11-) 110 3 901 ` t •_ 1100 .34 At n r en .o` s - r `° J r ,� s A 54 _ f _ is � 1.4• a1.a 3400 1 n 3 - r V t96.S' S 0 , ,./ _a■ 4 ..50Ac -. c \ d g N\ r-alw 1 00 • • - I 710 CY. r - • 7t_ ng � - - 0 1101 acre w 3 p ,' 7 114.15 - - 5 .23 sec t a 102 r . - t • NE cat tar - A -1411a 3500 •° - 600 z .r 450 • - 1 2, , 100 Nat • 4 10 ssosez ' - • 11)0 sib, 190. a' • SP', CE N - 4 •� ; •/s C R 9 4 7 tr 4 1801 f- 121.7' d `G Mikfi , 1i' li . tt._ t : , • 1 ��iv� /f n��l 2001 1s1. • 210 '`' _�._ ,, 2100 T • MAP !S C.'a� A ;�1:i- :'!�•'( • a . ` 1 - 2o/r NOT S � Z _ 3 Ts THELOC.' iONOri-kNY: - 9iMEN - �imu « M QC ITS , ER' • - S THEREIN. " 2 200 �- --r-- - r R ° - v • Mall m W . 1800 ' 141.9' Ali - ° ° .� • a • . 147.1' y 2 8 2000 }_\ r t ; =-� 1 r-4 1 W al r r` 4 � i 5 f', z ci . w e l 2300 - • act -_ • A w d �J D « 1.i► o ea • « o s • - .� 121 « r O ■ • 4 �ro i!• 1 1 • 141.4' • r �- � Z _ - - ir .... it _. _ r � THORN . ST Q1 1 � 0 3 - . Y a � 4, Mi.? ,U.* •3T 141. • 1702 • 1 705 17; - ' .1701 ! - -� I r o • SEE DE TA • >` as J 1- . �.: r. uo • ... .L rIM1h hReefsit, 0 Imo NIYWe.YSr l ♦11 ryWYlaee.Jli.r. t ') M ;MM S In Ti TATE e ■1T15>ttr KNOW ALL WSN ar 711141 PR1SINTS, That .24.1,i..L.,. ;, ' :.:• .. «.... « . « � ................ . floret � -- oolleldetetiotl lw »ttlrlfer at.[.d ... ham bargat t told grantor, tlte walla o! the ratite. hereinafter nomad, for th. • unto rf�ltl'.�t..XT... _ by pretenh dwe gent, bargain, w11 and eonrsr ' `. an utdl orle -half of the tai 'heroin called file grant**, ! lORrtng dacttbed reel 1 D+r� situated 1 1NlIJ M�SLR County, Oregon, to-wit; Lot 147 a >/ Win *) 7 e Washington County. Oregon. Fr. ..; ?,.:c. iai lIIIr i 1 parry c: r :tcc.!:ncdst•n anti. It hes not N..' examined u to Its execution or is to i : ' its effect upon the title. • •,.. 4 ' (IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) . ' :. together with all and singular the tenements, hereditament. and a F, — f . FIPpertaininli , ApurterunCea thereunto belonging or in artyl►iee a TO HAYS AN.D TO HOLD an undivided one -hall of the above described real property unto the grantee forever. I I 1 The above named grantor retain. a like undivided one -half of that same real property, and it is the intent and i It I pltrpoa of this Instrument to create and there hereby ie created an estate by the entirety between husband a i/ as to this real property. end wile ' ' 1''M true and actual consideration paid !or this transfer, stated in terms of dollars, is g. 1— ''•' of mHowever, the actual consideration consists al or includes other property or value given or promised which is II ' th '� consideration (lndlute wh ich )• m � . • pert or ftr. an (The sentence behveen the sya•,bols m,il not app,iubl., should be d.leted..See ORS 93.030.) I !i ' WITNESS grtor. hand this. 4,tb. ..day of. .. May.... 1994, •� THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE or THE PROPERTY DE• SCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION of APPLICABLE LAND •. USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. ICfORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING s+ II THIS INSTRUMENT a • ,; - I PROPERTY SHOUL THE PERSON ACQUIRING PEE TITLE TO THE D316 Land SHCK WITH TH APPOIAT! CITY OR II COUNTY PLANNING D PA T TO YERI ►Y A US • STATE OF OREGON, County of ....Et Ii SIs • This instrument was acknowledged before ate on - .. by 4434...L...1411451 , /9,.94.., 1 ' I = r OFFICIAL SEAL .. ` Jj NOTMY PUBLIC.O,E30N o Public 10r Or2ybn I • • . L MY COMMIS ON EXPIRES RAY 7 1997 My commission expires ..•,...,5 `j 7 ' .. ' ` I STATE OF OREGON, } is. . ~ County of M..r. 64 Ad4emo I certify that the within fn fru• ' . 5 I „ooxi ..t,... went was received for recotd on the II day of 1 ePAet .see.vea at O'clock , 19........, e nHhe'e Mime.w l Address M., and recorded II anw mewrw +�. h IN.. Aaa,e,e, rIr }r roe in book /real /volume No on I eeeoeoea •a ue. pegs or as lee /Ills /ins ttu- '' "Aait"- "�is�'� ment/microlilm/receptlon No ad � 1 j �' ' � �t Record of Deeds of said County, , I1 ... `R I ..AJ.abMIt..DR..97.QQb Witne Irat mowed aalr 4. /ar.11 As ap r n•eeh Mom, Ana„«, tt y hand and seal Of s1. County .11i :ed s m :, 9 • : I il Alps as above I HAY. .17,., Y Deputy j • Z. 8y it Ir .. . i' i'. . . �,,: r r • •. � • - • � :: �1; : � - L_ � ..' 1t " "'. r' A"�� 4K ' !^ • r t l.. h • f r4, E, j4. t��� , . . � ,S � ■I * S ' � 1 , � . u . -�� � r rt•: • • d:!'� • •' 3�� s, .: i• e S K .� i� �'v : 3: w :. 1s t`. 4; q. l.. , i . L a j ,a t • ` ,1 : r' ' x• 09 ' . y � I • r - t •• At t a r • • _�•; 1 .�:.Y }/t ,: "iY'�� . �,C� �:. dJ';: '� • .. , I;.• r ...? r, N- cl. � 1 j' l i la ; ,�tAf . .•t.`ZJ•'•h. r:.:^k∎. •rl� {F.4:t Ir' }• �:` 1 ' • ti , ti� }., • WYttILE:Ot 11661/0t/g0 OO'Ef 9SLEtt 1 10•11 ESfet01 1 00 4 • Alum) 13100J •u put b /01 4103 wftu Auer) uolOwtommloAluwa Ne001100A01.002 • • CITY OF TIGARD P Al ii RE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES ,r __y; RESIDENTIAL CITY OF TIGARD p fit. „ .14 -e 1 -/ 76 5 OREGON t DATE: (K STAFF: r 2 1 Ee 4- / APPLICANT: ) a .'. f 6 ' eti(� a,`'' i AGENT: Se?cZ t i7 01;141/1 r,K�y Phone: ( ) — 2 b' 6 b Z— Phone: ( I (., 3 q - 2> C /5 4 PROPERTY LOCATION / ADDRESS: ! ' ) r, CZ 64 W� 5s ‹_I— S S it et? TAX MAPITAX LOT: / 5 1 5 p ri l,4 - 1 00 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): Oil 1Her La ni.= `/`O PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: R. ✓Y46 Otte /di it V ' c'-2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: 1'7J1a.44t LGCS l g 12 6i c ciG ZONING DESIGNATION: f 1'2— CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACILITATOR: L: S Uti %���lr TEAM AREA: �as� PHONE: J5031 NIN DISTMENIpNAI� REQU I REMENT I / S t � RICT DI � r,} S ��� Vas ;�'�� wriP�. M inimum lot 4ize: 7, k) sq. ft. Average lot width: /10 u] ft. Maximum building height: 3 5 ft. Setbacks: front j.5 ft. side S ft. rear 1' ft. garage 2Oft. corner /c ft. from street. Maximum site covera e: f ) % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation area: l'-o °'o ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor and partition process. Lots created as part of a partition m s< have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. The depth of ail lots shall not exceed 2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 Yz times the minimum lot sizk o the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lots) 1 CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference PJotes Page 1 of 7 3eeidential .:c piic3tionsPlammng Department See;:an 1- � • Streets: `i 6 fe ram the centerline of S (../U ) W • Established areas: feet from Meet -- 0 c2 u • Lower intensity zones: 0 feet, along the site's kAJ- - ' 1 a boundary. ag at: foot side yard setback. - • Zero lot line lots: minimum 10 foot separation between buildings. • Muiti•family residential building separation: (Refer to Code Section 18.96.030) • • • . • ures up to 528 square feet in size may be permitted on Tots less than 2.5 acres in size • 5 foot minimum setbac from side and rear lot lines. Accessory structur 1000 square feet on parcels of at least 2.5 acres ii size (See applicable zoning distil etbacks for primary structures.) BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS • Maximum height of 30 feet in R•1, R•2. R -3.5 and R -4.5 zones. �-- ax!mum eight of 35 feet in R•7 and R -12 zone ▪ Maximum height of 45 feet in the R•25 zone. • Maximum height of 60 feet in the R -40 zone. FLAG LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Maximum height of 1 stories or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 2Y: stories, or 35 feet in R -7, R-12, R•25 or R -40 zone provided that the standards of Code Section 18.98.030(8) are met. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION The Net Residential Units allowed on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the developable land by h minimum number of square feet required per dwelling unit as specified by the applicable zoning designation. Net development are is calculated by subtracting the following land area(s) from the gross site area: 1. All sensitive lands areas including: a. Land within the 100 year floodplain. b. Slopes exceeding 25%. c. Orainageways. 2. Land dedicated for park purposes. 3. Public right-of-way dedication. 4. All and to be provided for private streets (includes accessways through parking areas). (Refer to Code Section 18.92) BLOCKS When block lengths greater than 600 feet are permitted, pedestrianibikeways shall be provided through the block. (Refer to Cade Section 18.164.040) RESIDENT! . ENS1TY TRANSFER The City • Tigard allows a Residential Density Transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise have been developed or sensitive lands . •as listed in (1.) above which may be appiied to the developable portion of the site. (Refer to Code Sec '. 18.92.030). It is the resoonsibility of the aoo •nt for a residential development application to provide a detailed calcuiation for both the permitter residential density and the requested •: sity transfer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes ?age 2 of 7 Residential :octicatiauP!ammng Jecartment Sec :ton 1l�J.UC.11.InL U6.1J11 1 I (1et1dJ11 IUIY Regardless of the allowed housing ilisity in a zoning district. any property within. feet of a designated established area sh not be developed at a density great Wan 125 percent of the maximum Comprehensive Plan designation (not zoning) of the adjace: • parce Transition area applies to any property which is a designated established area. The subject property is designated as al 4 '7 area. The subj ct property is adj ined y establishedldevelapinq)areas to the north, south, east and we:. z ' i s Lto' " s FUTURE STREET PIA • AND EXTENSION OF STREETS`—' 1. A future eet plan shall: • a. Be by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The plan shall show it pattern o xisting and proposed future streets from the boundaries of the proposed land division and shall incluc boundaries o • : proposed land division and shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacer to the proposed la . division. b. Identify existing or prop. • d bus routes. pullouts or other transit facilities, bicycle routes and pedestrian facilitiE on or within 500 feet of the 'te. 2. Where necessary to give access or permit a s. ' factory future division of adjoining land, streets shall be extended to tr. boundary lines of the tract to be developed. (Re • to Code Section 18.164.030) RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS All subdivisions and minor partitions are subject to solar access require ents. These requirements state that a minimum of 80% c all lots created must be oriented for solar accessibility. The basic standard, which determines solar accessibility, requires that 80% of total number of proposed lots: 1. Oemonstrate a north -south dimension of at least 90 feet. 2. Oemonstrate a front lot line orientation within 30 degrees of a true east-west axis. The total or partial exemption of a site from the solar access requirement may be approved for the following reasons: 1. East, west or north slopes steeper than 20%. 2. Off-site shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography). 3. On -site shade sources (vegetation). Adjustments allowing a reduction of the 80% solar lot design requirement may be made for the following reasons: 1. Reduced density or an increased cost of at least five percent due to either: a. East. west or north slope greater than 10%. b. Significant natural feature. c. Existing road or lotting pattern. d. Public easement or right-of-way. - Reduction in important development amenities. 3. Pre - existing shade (vegetation). 1 PLEASE: NQ<:TE Maas and text are reauired which are sufficient to show that the development comolies with the solar design standards. or that specific lots should be exempted or adjusted out. The following items shall be included in the analysis: CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 7 Residential .:cplica['.ent ?!anrJng 7eean:xnt Sec::on , the IU[ UIIIItl1lSlUll ,i11U IfUlll .Ul UI ddLI1 IifUIlUSd IUI 2. Protected solar building lin nd relevant building site restrictions, if app e. 3. For the purpose of identifylirees related to exemption requests. a map showing existing trees which are at least 30 let: tall and over 6 inches diameter at a paint 4 feet above grade shall be submitted. This map shall include the following: I a. Height. b. Diameter. c. Species. d. A statement declaring that they are to be retained. 4. Copies of all private restrictions relating to solar access. The design characteristics of a developed solar- oriented lot are high levels of wintertime sun striking the south walls and roofs c the house, house orientation maximizing south window area, and a south-sloping roof area. To achieve this, one may utilize th. following: 1. Protected Solar Building Line . The solar building line must: a. Be oriented to within 30 degrees of a true east -west axis. b. Provide a minimum distance of 70 feet from the middle of the lot to the south property line. c. Provide a minimum distance of 45 feet from the northernmost buildable boundary of the subject lot to the rt: property line. 2. Performance Options There are two performance options which may be utilized as follows: a. The house to be oriented within 30 degrees of an east -west axis and have at least 80% of the ground floor's soutl wall protected from shade. b. At least 32% of the glass and 500 square feet of the roof area face south and be protected from shade. Please contact the Building Division for further information regarding the Protected Solar Building Line and Performance Options relating to building height and construction. PARKING AND ACCESS All parking areas and driveways must be paved. • Single family: Requires 2 off - street parking spaces per dwelling unit. • Multiple family: Requires 1. par ing spaces per unit for am- Requires 2 parking spaces per unit for 1+ bedrooms. Multi•famil welling unitt--kuith more than 10 reed spaces shall provicleqarking fithe . use of.,quests and shall consist of 15" of the total req ' d parking. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.30) No more than 40° of r•' ired spaces may be designated andlor dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensionec as follows: • Standard parkin. space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. • Compact parking sp . e dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. • Handicapped parking: Al Barking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disable.: • rson parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, arc- " mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (AD . A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbc shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appro. ate sign shall be posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 7 Residential .aopiicauoruP!anning ]eoarnrent Sec :inn olc ycie racks are requlreu tor muwtt- ramiiy, cam rclai anu lnaustnal developments. ycle racks shall be located in areas protec :. from automobile traffic and in con nt locations. icycle parking spaces shall rovided on the basis of one space for eve 15 required vehicular parking spac Minimum number of accesses: ���- Mini access width: 2 ' . Maximum access width: 4200 Minimum avement width: '2__._ REQUIRED WALK". LOCATION Within all attach:. Lousing (except two - family dwellings) and multi - family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connecte by walkway to the ve lar parking area, common open space and recreation facilities. • CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at roadldriveway, roadlrailroad, ar. roadlroad intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Cade Section 18.102) BDF REF ING AND REEKING �` i in order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent develop \ nt: especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer a ea. j are described by the Cade in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may als b 1 required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may !Ely be occupied by vegetation fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Cummunir i Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) r The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: / 44 ft. along north boundary. __ /1 + ft. along east boundary. YI /� ft. rsauthr. /l ft. alon boundary. t 4- �, i,,d e k . **i'k sour -t? it ddition, sight obscuring screening is required albs `� STREET TREES Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 1C I ( feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or an private property within six feet of the right -of -way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking at areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Cade Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) ..... SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained pr to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sig ea ar height beyond Cade standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. \ natively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 7 iestdential Aap:icanamPlammn Cepartment Secnan APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted •Planning Division staff member of the Commit Development Department at Tigard City H offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applicattons submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptan may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. an Thursday will be batched for processing with the following wee applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4 :30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch b,r 1.1 inch ma,) a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application wi. unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or addition copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as beir complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions ma take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal an this matter would be heard by the Tigard 6 xcw 9 upon q '�IU I A Yt it , � �asic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division u on re ues; This pre -apps cation conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primar Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City star and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. • PLEASE NOTE The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre - application conferences) islare required if an application(s) islare to be submitted more than six months following this pre - application conference, unless the additional conferencels) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: t� 4 � CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639 -4171 CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 7 aesidential .. cniutiauP!anning ]eoarment Sec:on SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulati• •r I which are potentially unsuitable for develop t due to areas within the 100 -year floodplai natural drainageways, wetland ar• : , an slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminar identify sensitive lands areas at the ; e•application conference based an available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility precisely identify sensitive lands areas, an• their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions . sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on p : s submitted with the development application. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.84) Chapter 18.94 also provides regulations for the use, pro • ction, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development prohibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication o 10-year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas required as a condition of the approval of a development apph : ion. NARRATIV • -- - - - - -- - - -•- -- The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings for all applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. Applicant shoui review code for applicable criteria. NEIGHBORHOOD M ING The applicant sh notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator of their proposal. A minimum 2 weeks between the ailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concernin site posting and the meet' otice. RECYCLING 1 8. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: PROCEDUR Administrative staff review. Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation an the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 7 3esidentiai +apiicanc®P!anning peoartment Sac::on CITY OF TIGARD • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4 , APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639 -4171. X�1111 Staff: 14413 Date: - 7// 8 / 4 5 . I APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ .\.IARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) o/ B) Owner's signature/written authorization ■ � C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies E) Filing Fee Pac/J25:–.*,5 5 Z �� I SITE - SPECIFIC MAPS) /PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Site Into ation showing: No. of Copies 1. Vicinity ap ❑ 2. Site size : dimensions ❑ 3. Contour line (2 ft at 0 -1O% or 5 ft for grades > 10 %) ❑ 4. Drainage patte s, courses, and ponds ❑ 5. Locations of natu .1 hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain ar- .s ❑ (b) Slopes in exces of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil osion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely w -.k foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as sh. n on the Comprehensive Map inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" _ caliper measured 4 fee from ground level ❑ 8. Location of existing structures and their uses ❑ 9. Location and type of on and off -site noise source ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and easements ❑ 11. Location of existing dedicated right -of -ways .ANO LSE AP°LIGTICN / LIST ?ACE 1 OF 5 8) Site Develoment PI ndicatin • : •o. of Copies 1. The prop •sed site and surrounding properties ❑ 2. Contour li e intervals ❑ 3. The locatio dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing ' platted streets & other public ways and easement on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ (b) Proposed s. eets or other public ways & easements on the site ❑ (c) Alternative ro tes of dead end or proposed streets that require fut e extension ❑ 4. The location and dime of: (a) Entrances and exit. on the site ❑ (b) Parking and circulat •n areas ❑ (c) Loading and services . ea ❑ (d) Pedestrian and bicycle •rculation ❑ (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ • (f) Above ground utilities ❑ 5. The location, dimensions & setbac distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, provements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the sit ❑ (b) Proposed structures, improvements utilities and easements on the site ❑ 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of do nstream conditions ❑ 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ 8. The location areas to be landscaped ❑ 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting cons'. -ring crime prevention techniques ❑ 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 11. The location of all structures and their orientation ❑ 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreement- ❑ • C) Grading P :n Indicating: No. of Copies The site dev_ opment plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site ana sis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location .nd extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General •ntour lines ❑ (b) Slope ratio ❑ (c) Soil stabiliza on proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate t e of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a re istered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface explorat en and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanita sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will .- mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LINO U5c .APP! ,CATION / UST ?ACE 2 CF 5 0) .-architectural Drawin • s I ' .icatin : e ,.. of Copies - The site developmelplan • oposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the quare footage of all structures proposed for use on -site 2. Typical elevation drawings of e. structure E) Landscape Plan In,icatin_: No. of Copies The landscape plan all be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larg:r scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the it ':ation system where applicable ❑ 2. Location and height or - ences, buffers and screenings ❑ 3. Location of terraces, dec , shelters, play areas, and common open spaces o 4. Location, type, size and sp-.'es of existing and proposed plant materials ❑ 5. Landscape narrative which also .ddresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion co trot measures that ill be used ❑ F) Sign Drawings: ❑ Sign drawings shall be submi ed in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as part of the Site D lopment Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generatio Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partition /Lot Line Adjustment Map Indicating: No. of Copies 1. The owner of the subject parcel 2. The owner's authorized agent Leui 3. The map scale (20,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date 4. Description of parcel location and boundaries 5. Location, width and names of streets. easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel 6. Location of all permanent buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines 7. Location and width of all water courses 8. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ��- 9. All slopes greater than 25% 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements 11. For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right -of -way location and width i (b) A scaled cross - section of the proposed street plus any reserve strip 12. Any applicable deed restrictions 13. Evidence that land partition will not preclude efficient future land division where applicable _w0 LSE .'P °j :CVTION / LIST ?ACC 3 OF 5 11 uoalvIsion.'reIiminary Plat \ta• ana Data Indicatin : t o. of Copies 1. Scale eq .Iingg,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per .heet ❑ 2. The propos -d name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity ma• showing property's relationship to arterial and collector stre- s ❑ 4. Names, addres.es and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surve er and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of applicati •n ❑ 6. Boundary lines o' tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacen subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels o un- subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines relate• to a City- established benchmark at 2 -foot intervals for 0 -10% grades gre. er than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, pe and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the propose. subdivision): (a) Public and private 'ght -of -ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private s. itary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water main- including fire hydrants 0 (d) Major power telephon_ transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) 0 (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for par s, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles o .roposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicat =d on the plans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed water distribu on system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydra is ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles shows g the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reason,ble distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street ri , ht-of- way(s) 0 14. The location of all areas subject to inunda 'on or storm water overflow 0 15. Location, width & direction of flow of all water courses & drainage -ways 0 16. The proposed lot configurations, approximate of dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for pu •oses other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 inches •r greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the locati in of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a statement •f which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improveme ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & mar areas ❑ 21. If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and sub itted with the application LANO 1,5E .APPLICATION / UST ?.ACE 1 CF 5 • J) Solar Access Calculatns: K) Other Information No. of Copies o h: login\carty'masters\ltkl ist.:nst mav 23. 1995 LAND LSE .{PP! ,C+TCQN / LIST P.kC= 5 OF 3 . j j ° X 163.8 /- • * . 4 ► 1k 1 . _t . ,... 4-, D li.. ,4 H: 0MN. .0 0 MH. � . A175. a llill PINElllidt MH.0 fil i lia I r a 1 .. i PE o 4 ��;, X .. lir 0 •• fi . 0 .- gaff& w id , 1 - � - X 0 0 0 0 � I ) TREES f o 4 Q X \II. 5 _ • �` 4 0 O O ►c p 0 O I I r X- �0_.rI•Q.p • t 4 c( r«w .tip 1 ;�iri: ."rajr.• / J I o X 181.7 S. VY S T. . a 41111W e I 6 0 11 t n j _ v i Ce- 1111_• i x IIIII Nip it � X E , iv or © * X _ Q x •X X X . 0 T X , 0 a X , C 0 _ - Oh 1P• III X X -X- LIII X ..� X 177.42 ..1 • =� MH. • 4.-- - X Ahem T. O G C , X Iii ©X 1 X 1 172.4 TREES l 'I\ 7.)4 je l • / • • PUBLIC FACILITIES • CITY OF TIGARD The purpose of the pre-application conference is to: OREGON (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions. (2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns. (3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the final decision making authority shall be for the application. The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Riuht- of•wav dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: X /s` 1k/4 emu) oerN 1 44 CP /qq0 — S3 (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: (1.) to feet from centerline. (2.) to feet from centerline. (3.) to feet from centerline. Street improvements: F/1 /4 (1.) L / Z. street improvements will be necessary along �p� . (2.) street improvements will be necessary along (3.) Street improvements shall include feet of pavement from centerline, plus the installation of curb and gutters, storm sewers, underground placement of utility wires (a fee may be collected if determined appropriate by the Engineering Department), a five -foot wide sidewalk (sidewalks may be required to be wider on arterials or major collector streets, or in the Central Business District), necessary street signs, streetlights, and a two year streetlighting fee. f.," tt.6 S7YZ6Z T &,i''4 , CITY OF TIGARO Pre•Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 3 Residential AppiicationlEngineerinq Department Section In some cases, where street impr ments or other necessary public improvers are not currently practical, the street improvements may be deferred. In cases, a condition of development approval may be specified which requires the property • owner(s) to execute a non - remonstrance agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district formed to improve: (1.) (2.) Pedestrianwayslbikeways: Sanitary Sewers: The nearest sanitary sewer line to this property is a(n) B inch line which is located in 5,2e/ce . The proposed development must be connected to a sanitary sewer. It is the developer's responsibility to extend the sewer along the proposed development site's ,4 SS/A 4igr SE e .r v7 ,c,4 -tiU q . Z 3 1,0ilreS e' -' 4.J4 p6:244447- Water Supply: The TV Water District - Phone:(5O3) provides public water service in the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your proposed development. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District (Contact: Gene Birchill, (503) 526 -2502) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Other Agency Permits: Storm sewer improvements: j/417y /2 l/lE411 S DI l7i 4 - / -tri At Y/��.F - e- , a- c y 4— /-/"//74 #1/4/... .5=-7 STORMWATER QUALITY FEES The Unified Sewerage Agency has established, and the City has agreed •,. ^^ 1111_•,,, Management Regulations which requires the construction of on -site water q 7 ' 20'95 applicant may be offered an opportunity to pay a fee in lieu of the construct AGL construction of a water quality facility andlor the payment of a fee. The 1 surface; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof, the fee shall bl a fee may be paid or a facility shall be 7� • ' � constructed. /'4 y /6' 74/4.,1 a' 72-44- • CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Residential AppficationiEngineering Department Section • • TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES In 1990, Washington County adopted a county -wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic Impact Fee program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land, the size of the project, and a general use based fee category. The TIF shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances, payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of the payment until occupancy is permissible Ll when the TIF is greater than $5,000.00. STREET OPENING PERMIT No work shall be preformed within a public right -of -way, or shall commence, until the applicant has obtained a street opening permit from the Engineering Department. FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS All projects that require a grading plan also require that the applicant shall submit a typical floor plan for each lat. This floor plan shall indicate the elevations of the four corners of that plan along with elevations at the corner of each lot. PREPARED BY- ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639-4171 h:lloginlpet tylpreapp.mst (eng.section preapp.eng) January 11. 1995 CITY OF TIGARO Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 3 Residential ApplicationiEngineering Department Section LA•USE APPLICATION FEE SCHOOL • APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission 235.00 costs Planning Commission /Hearings Off. to Council 315.00 + transcript BLASTING PERMITS 125.00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING Text only, Map only, or both 675.00 CONDITIONAL USE PROCESSING Conditional Use Review 365.00 FLEXIBLE SETBACK STANDARDS 80.00 HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT 80.00 HOME OCCUPATION TYPE I 10.00 TYPE II 50.00 INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 55.00 b Community Development Department LAND PA - Residential and Non - residential 235 50.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Conceptual and detailed plan review 500.00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood plain 520.00 Wetlands /Steep slopes /Drainageway 235.00 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS 230.00 SIGN PERMIT 0 -24 sq. ft. 10.00 24 -100 sq. ft 25.00 100 + sq. ft . 35.00 Temporary signs 10.00 each sign SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under $10,000 80.00 $10,000 - $99,999 155.00 $100,000 - $499,999 315.00 $500,000 - $999,999 415.00 $1,000,000 or more 520.00 +$1 per$10,000 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT 415.00 + $5/LOT Subdivision Variance, if needed 105.00 TEMPORARY USE Director's Decision 50.00 Special exemption /Non- Profit -0- TREE REMOVAL PERMIT -0- VACATIONS Streets and public access 300.00 deposit - actual costs VARIANCE charged Administrative 80.00 Sign Code 230.00 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS Less than 10 acres 520.00 10 acres or more 625.00 ZONE CHANGE PROCESSING Less than 10 acres 520.00 10 acres or more 625.00 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 310.00 JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE 100% of highest planning fee plus 10% of all additional planning fees related to the proposal. Approved by City Council Effective 2/1/91 H:ILOGINIDSTSIFEESCH ED • °:n -3!fi . — •1 A = 3'17'30" R = 1477.40 3 44 o 1 / 4. L = 84.88 0 • O. LC = N 6'17'20" W p — • N 84 I N I O N O d M I - ti z • N Zi. II AA y rej 1 ~ = 9'22'00" Dc 4' • . ko • g N ca R = 1432.40 • z — .EAST 194.15 - - 0.- , v L = 234.16 W 18 .85 1 0 1 �'� LC = N 4'46'45",W m N 85'21'2 E 0 CV 233.90 ti / g 3 I Q O • us O 1'31'40" S., INC. (4 v R = 1477.40 1RIVE, m Q °D M 40 �I L = N 8'4 i _ LC = N 8'41'55" W 17124 �. - __ - _ _ �PA• ? �" _.. - - :. 39.38 __.. 21 40 S.F. ► .■ _ . ti f- U ►- 00 0 W • • 6 Q0 ' N 89'54'00" E o co . ti • • ti 75 , N 89'54'00" E � a c. 43 P T 84.15 , �' 18T• 1 OO v 30 • 1 PARCEL 1 I. _ 5 o • 1990 ce 6105 S.F. M/L 1 = ° • z ,� 1 = ° o PARCEL 3 — � ' m 11 • 0 0 el cc N 6,055 S.F. M/L 2 N = � z z co /000 75.20 ; 34.8q 79.16 8 5 ® .18 +65 5R 7 _. D ti 59 r S 89' S4� 00" W 194.15 Ni r 1 o (.7 o c I w ;HED 0 I S. W. SPRUCE STREET I r ;CORD ON 1 f C.R. 947 1 :I1 ('il . N\ . _ _ _ 116.47 - N 89' 54' 00" E - cq- g/10 CAP - A ( ' • 13.w_w_t___SA_Nacz0 114 014N15uLTINICq_ 7Cces.14. 1-1-4mPi6N1 I23 7223 DaAQ_ C TtC-3 ACZ (RAM } Mel LE - RuL LE W_T_E_MI glu OKI 9. 00 I oF ID PA 10 ete L4 ; Lari •-" CO0 i liac = -413z9sct, Lora= (12_10.5 W_G _ Ut . =r) _ VIA A Pg_ivA-Ta tAir LL) LAN13 -FoR_ Lor LAN OuT AKID larip\-Nce vQ4).. ATTE A ( P.c.- -- AP D Ck AM AU ATI c.) N 4N CIO t KS 0E-uacyc- F LE G21\ A - Mq .ME 7 qoLk q4ic_ —nmE _ _ _ • • / L - i - . 1 / , 151354o-01200 - - _ _ _ _ _ 151350,03000 S1354A-0340k PINE ST CO 15135460090D • ,�<�� ..0 -1 1S13S40-00901 151354D-00400 151354D01103 15135460110( 151354D03400 151354D00500 1S1354D-0110i 1. 13SAD03300 16 1 35AD435CD Is ommomm RULE ST C C ,S13541}-02101 1S13541}-02100 1S13541}01900 ,5,35460200, t S135AD.gc.t . 151354D02200 a. 1S13540-02CO3 UO 1 . c: • ' 1S,354D02300 , CO F - 1 rn co 0 Z . _ 6 0 �, Vicinity Map MLP 95- 0016/DAVIS PARTI NOl ICAITON MAP • • - FAX TRANSMITTAL - CITY OF TIGARD PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO IN THE LEGALS SECTION DATE: 12/29/95 TO: Sue Curran, Legals (fax) 620 -3433 FROM: Patricia Lunsford, City of Tigard (Ph.) 639 -4171 MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95 - 0016 ➢ DAVIS PARTITION A A request to partition one existing .49 acre lot into three (3) Tots of 6,708, 6000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Multiple - Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. (PLACE VICINITY MAP HERE) The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on 12/15/95. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM 12/15/95. TT PUBLISH DATE: 1/4/95 MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD DATE: December 7. 1995 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 • RE: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95 -0016 ➢ DAVIS PARTITION g A request to partition one existing .49 acre lot into three (3) lots of 6,708, 6000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Multiple - Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - December 18. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • �► (Please provufe the fa information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS *QUEST FOR COMMENTS • 1 -P QS ®G l r L NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPUCATIONS ;::: >::.:.::.:.:;:.:. ;. :;. :: :.:.:.:.............. •;.:•.. :. • ::;:CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS«:<; :;. >. >;::: :::::: : :< • ::: ..;.:'..i:: : :::•' . .. ::...:.':...,,...':;_::::> •':: '•:.:. (circle one) _ CIT Area: (N) (S) (D (0 " Placed for review in Library CIT Book " _ CPO NO. : : : : : :CnTY EPAR •• T ;:. .:;::. >: D ARM :.:..::... t! BLDG. DEPTJDave Scott, Lida ona w LICE DEPTJKeIIy Jennings 6,,„ j3 . ± RATIONS/John Acker, ram VV csP. CJ�If _ ADMINJCE yy( e,ye� at ENG. DEPT) n, oar. Rev Eng. Raw. _ , COM.DEV. DEPTJD.S.T.'S _ DV. PLNGJ --' 7. 1 I V ! ] j � .semorFanner WATER DEPTJMichael MIller, ooerat(ons cr. SPECIAL: DISTRICTS: ::> >::' <:::`:::::..:; ;::: >: :..::. .:;::: >::: :.:::?•. :. :::;:;::;'`:: > >::<: €•:.: _ ✓FIRE MARSHALL ✓ UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Blrchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa. County Flre District 155 N. First Street Beaverton, OR 97075 (pick -up box) Hillsboro, OR 97124 • :. ::•<::,::.::: .::..::: ..::.::.;;.:...:. • :;:<: >; >::: :•i ? • :. :• . ::.;.. . AF ; .,. :. FECTED • JURISDICTIONS . . .. :.:...:.. WA. CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. _ METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _ METRO -CREENSPACES 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. 116, Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232 -2736 _ Brent Curtis (CPA's) _STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION �-' �� ; r 1 _ Jim Tice (IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi ODOT /R iErsta- -Z ?: / ti ) _ Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 e6. g OAS _ Scott King (CPA's) Portland, OR 97225-0412 2 54 /2 123 N.W. Flanders _ Tom Harry (Current Planning App's) 2 (It 7 S 1 (J) P��ortIan , O 7209 -4037 _ Lynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) _ OREGON O D S ' N.E OA's) 5 C a C e O T HE f CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem, OR 97310-0590 / &. d tt � � Larry Conrad, Senior Planner Q «7? OF PORTLAND PO Box 4755 _ CITY OF DURHAM Planning Director Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483 Portland, OR 97204 _ CITY OF KING CITY Tigard, OR 97281 -3483 . City Manager — CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 15300 SW 116th _ CITY OF TUALATIN City Manager King City, OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 :;: > :: > :: : > :::.::. : :: : :: :; > : :: « ::: : :: ; ::; >:::::: : >: SPECIAL AGENCIES >' >::::' ::::: : :::::. ':::.::: •::':: ;::::::> : .. ... .. .. .:....: .: ....:. . _ GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _ rORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _ COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Jim Wieskamp, Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholis Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard, OR 97281 -3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton, I OR 97005 s 721-24411 _ NW NATURAL CAS CO. vnone:1sol -24721-24411 _ METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS i TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer Fax (soo 721•7e02 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox, Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Portland, OR 97232 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 _ TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS — SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Forney, PLS- Protect Eng. 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave., Room 324 Portland,.OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Union Station Portland, OR 97209 :::: ' : STATE:' AGENCIES:: >:::';;:,::;::.., : . : :•: >: >:: ..:::.: ... .... ERAL AGENCIES . : > . : > < <;'s < ::;. >: :'.;' _ AERONAUTICS DIVISION (000T) _ DIVISION OF STATE LANDS US POSTAL SERVICE _ COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H. PARK _ FISH & WILDLIFE Randy Hammock, Growth Cord. _ PUC _ DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station _ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Portland, OR 97229 -9998 _ U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS _ OTHER n:vooimpattw•(modcrost • . AI(P9.5 CITY OF TIGARD August 8, 1996 OREGON Brett A. Moon 8807 SW Spruce Street Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Moon: I read your letter and understand your concern. Our engineering department is responsible for reviewing grading and plans for drainage. I forwarded your letter to Brian Rager the City Development Review Engineer. It appears that Dr. Davis is proceeding within proper engineering requirements. I have attached a memo from Brian Rager that clarifies . the issues. Please contact Brian at (503) 639 -4171 if you have any additional questions. Sincerely, /mil '�- . 1111 1f Richard Bewersdorff Planning Manager i :lcurpinldick\rnoon.let c: Brian Rager Correspondence file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: August 7, 1996 TO: Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: RESPONSE TO BRETT MOON LETTER This is in response to the letter received from Brett Moon, dated August 7, 1996. Engineering has approved plans for Davis that would result in a 3 foot fill at the northwest corner lot. The reasoning for this is that existing grades (prior to development) sloped to the northwest. Davis could not obtain off -site storm easements to drain his development so now he has to fill the northwest corner to get the drainage to flow out to the east toward Hall Boulevard. Davis has obtained approval from ODOT to make the necessary storm connection. We are still reviewing proposed revised plans from Davis' engineer that would raise the northwest grade another foot (total of 4 feet of fill), along with other changes that impact the lot at the corner of Spruce and Hall. I am not so concerned about the 4 feet of fill as I am the other issue with the corner lot. My opinion about the fill is that Moon's property will not experience an increase in runoff. In fact, theoretically, it will see far less runoff than what would be experienced during pre - developed conditions (based on a 25 -year storm). a 4 -foot high difference between properties is not significant. The only runoff he could experience is from what rain water will fall on the small slope; when the slope is planted with grass, he should not see any runoff. Until that time, erosion control fences must be up and functioning to prevent sediment from leaving the Davis site. The fill will not create a dam that will impact Moon because the topography on Moon's property slopes to the northwest (away from Davis). As far as a fence goes, Moon can re- install a fence on his own property if he wants, but we can not require Davis to install a fence on his site. I would imagine that the new home owners will install a fence of their own. Moon should remember that any fence over 6 feet high will require a building permit. Let me know if I can help further. is \eng \brianr \0807dick.mem PAGE 1 • • RECEIVED PLANNING AUG O 7 1996 To the City of Tigard- Planning Dept, In the later part of June 1996, Dr. Gene Davis proposed draining surface water off of the 3 sub lots. 8735 S.W. Spruce St. (WCTM 15135 AD Tax lot 3400) east adjoining lot. At which time he requested that I go to the city and give him drainage e ectmenient rights to out scrods my property. 14e suggested that he could furnish drainage pipe and I could install it. That time I contacted the city as well as Dr. Gene Davis, and denied access drainage rights through my property. At that time Dr. Gene Davis told me if I did not let him go through my property , he would go around my property, through my surrounding neighbors, build up the grade of his property, and I was going to flood. The second week in July Dr. Gene Davis started filling the grade of the said lots. At the current rate by the time he reaches my bordering property, at the west end, his grade will reach 4 feet above my existing ground level. Which at the lower northwest end of my lot is already bad water drainage problems, which increased dramatically when the state built the adult foster care home. Raising their grade by 1 foot,and dry welling roof and surface water on north back side of there property, resulting in 2 inches of standing water and river running water through my property. At which time I complained to the city of Tigard which fell on deaf ears. If the city of Tigard plans to let 1)avis continue his reckless building and constructions habits, I will be forced into holding the city of Tigard responsible. If Dr. Gene Davis needs to build his current grade to such heights, I feel that there should be in place a retaining wall barrier to hold back" fill " and "water ". I also will be losing my privacy fence which borders our property, and feel that this section of fencing should maintain my right to a 6 foot privacy fence. Placing this section on top of the new filled grade. If these matters are not looked into seriously, I will feel that my rights as a citizen • of Tigard are being violated, and I will take further action. Sincerely, Citizen and Tax payer Brett A. Moon 8807 S.W. Spruce St. Tigard, OR. 97223 • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON DATE: July 25, 1996 TO: Dick Bewersdorff, Planning Division FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineer RE: MLP 95 -0016, Davis Partition Regarding the letter from the concerned property owners, dated July 24, 1996, here is a run- down of what we have done: 1. Final plat map has been reviewed and returned to the surveyor for correction and we are awaiting the submittal of the mylar copies of the plat for signature. 2. On 6/24/96, we issued ENG 96 -0030 to the Davis' to allow them to install their public improvements as required by the MLP approval. All necessary fees were paid ($ 764.00) and surety was secured through the Davis' insurance company. 3. Mrs. Davis has requested that they be allowed to start one house in the 3 -lot partition under the argument "we have one lot already, so we should be able to build one house ". Although I do not agree with that argument, I told her that I would consider signing off for one building permit under the following conditions: a. All utility work permitted under ENG 96 -0030, except for maybe the finishing of the driveway, shall be completed and inspected for compliance. b. The final plat needs to be signed by the City. c. Her surveyor will need to stake the new property corners of the lot she wishes to build on (this is to ensure the house gets placed in the right spot). 4. Soon after we issued ENG 96 -0030, the Davis' engineer submitted a proposed revision to the site plan that included grade changes that raised a concern. The raising of grades appears to cut off drainage from the house at the corner of Spruce and Hall. We have not approved the revised plan yet because we are working with Davis' engineer to resolve the issue. Regarding the list of items requested by the "Concerned Neighbors ", I do not feel compelled, nor do I consider it a priority, to produce copies of the material and send it out to everyone within 250 feet. The material they are concerned about is public record, and they can come to the office to review it if they want. If they want copies, they can pay for them. I would be very surprised if all neighbors within 250 feet are as concerned as the party(ies) who instigated this letter. The fact that no one was willing to sign their name to the letter leads me to believe that this letter is an attempt by one, or a few people to throw up road blocks because they do not like their neighbor. c: FILE: Spruce Street (Davis), ENG 96 -0030 i:\eng\brianr\0724dick.mem PAGE 1 • • REDEI VED NT DATE: July 24, 1996 41 -n- 2 4 19 COMMUNITY DEVELOP TO THE CITY OF TIGARD - PLANNING DEPT. This notice is being sent to you out of serious concern for the safety and welfare of the property owners surrounding the Gene and Vivian Davis property at 8735 SW Spruce Street, ( WCTM 1S1 35AD, Tax Lot 3400). With total disregard for other property owners rights the Davis's have started the illegal construction of the improvements for three lots in which the City of Tigard has granted Conditional Approval. Mr. Davis who holds himself out to be a Christian has threatened three of the neighbors. The police were contacted and dispatched July 12, 1996 due to his actions. Mr. Davis has a long history of threats and actions in total disregard to the City and his neighbors. We have extreme concern for the safety of the neighborhood. We find no evidence of any compliance to the requirements that were placed on the Davis' by the City of Tigard Minor Land Partition MLP 95 -0016. In the event the City continues to allow the illegal actions of Davis to continue and we sustain damages we will hold the City of Tigard responsible. To be specific we find no evidence that "PRIOR TO RECORDING OF THE PLAT MAP" any of the Conditions of Approval have been completed. We have found evidence that Davis has illegally begun sewer, water, gas and electric improvements and placing unimproved fill material, without satisfying the Conditions of Approval. The City of Tigard should require the illegal improvements be removed or provide proof of approved stamped engineered drawings, and all inspection reports. We formally ask for certified, dated copies of the above. We formally ask for certified copies of the satisfaction of items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of the MLP 95 -0016. We formally ask for a copy of the Improvement Agreement and the Bond and /or proof of a cash deposit. We formally ask for proof of that all City fees have been paid. We formally ask for proof of the Notice to the City of work is to begin. We formally ask for a Copy of the Certified Improvement Estimate. We formally ask for a copy of a Tree removal permit, ref. Section 18.150.20 • • In the event the City of Tigard can not provide certified copies of all of the items, Davis is in violation of Section 18.164.150. In the event the City does not take action to ensure that all actions are immediately complied with, we will hold the City responsible for all damages that may occur to our properties. We are very concerned that in the event the City does not take proper actions, Mr. Davis will continue to disregard other property rights and continue his illegal actions and may cause harm to his neighbors as evidenced by his past actions; of which many are on file with the City Police and Planning Departments. Your immediate attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. We request the certified copies of the above be sent to all property owners within 250 feet of the Davis' property. The Concerned Neighbors cc: Neighbors within 250 feet Tigard Times Mayor of Tigard Unified Sewer District Oregon Department of Transportation RECEIVED PLANNING JAN 2 9 1996 Case No. MLP95 -0016 City of Tigard :Davis Partition Location 8735 S.W. Spruce St. Tigard Ore. The proposed partition to subdivided -3- Multiple Family Residential Tax Lot 3400. This brings concern of possible "Flooding" to my lot at 8807 B.W. Spruce St. adjoining the west end of said property. In the past the new construction at 8787 S.W. Spruce St. State owned Adult Foster care facility have ignored all city ordinances, construction 5ft. from property lines not 15ft. easements between properties as should be. But the concerns are Drainage Foundations construction Raises the elevation of said Lots 1 1/2ft. higher then west neighboring lot's. All Drainage including House Gutters are Dry Welled. So being a low lot water leeches through the ground, and surfaces in the middle and lower end of my lot. This leaves flooding and drainage and expense costs to me and other neighboring lots without further concern from the city or new neighbors. There for I feel that the city should do all in it's power to insure that no holding pond and that proper drainage to the city sewer and drainage to the storm drains are followed to the letter to insure such drainage problems and expenses do not fall on existing neighbors. Thank you for your time and considerations of the following concerns on my behalf Tigard citizen and Tax payer, • • COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684 -0360 Notice TT 8375 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising R E C E I V E D *City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice kJAN 0 8 1996 13125 SW Hall Blvd. •Tigard,Oregon 97223 -8199 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit ITV ®F TIGARD •Accounts Payable -Terry • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION .,;, t fl STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss' .J tdk i'C'fr I, Kathy Snyder] .a 9 being first duly sworn, depose and say, that I am the Advertising , Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard Tualatin Times r;, .,z. , a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 • and 193.020; published at Tigard in the '` i 3 aforesaid county and state; that the MLP - - 001 6 Davis Partition • a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and consecutive in the following issues: January 4,1996 1 6 - 144 1S - j Subscribed and sworn to ore me this4th day of January ,19 -- - - �.�- ---�,,,� OFFICI ; " AL = ` Cfl' A. BURGESS i' • ? s. NOTAR`� I'd.3I-IC - OF.E ^ON Nota blic for Oregon J COMMISSION NO. 02.1652 q My Commission Expires: MY COMM!S;!ON EXPIRES MAl'13, 1997 ■ AFFIDAVIT _ • • • MINOR ��A\ PARTITION (MLP) 95- 0016>DAVIS PARTITION A rcquesi it) pa. ution one existing .49 acre lot into (3) lots of 6,708, 6,000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 S.W. Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Mul- tiple- Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. .7, 0 . 1 ---- 11111 1 . . a -I Al II , Ili i I InN• 1111111.1 PINE ST 1 MEI OM -L 1_ � al III.Iff � i r III The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on 1/16/96. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Develop- ment Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 P.M., 1/16/'96. TT8375- Publish January 4, 1996. � " �� • • R IC vEp RIAN� NINA TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE „IA X1 AND 19 BEAVERTON FIRE DEPARTMENT U 44 F& RESG` ` 4755 S.W. Griffith Drive • P.O. Box 4755 • Beaverton, OR 97076 • (503) 526 -2469 • FAX 526 -2538 January 16, 1996 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re; 3 -Lot Partition for Dr. Gene Davis 8735 S.W. Spruce Street MLP 95 -0016 File Number: 512 -95 Dear Mark: This is a Fire and Life Safety Plan Review and is based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) and those sections of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC) specifically referencing the fire department, and other local ordinances and regulations. This plan review shall become a part of the approved plans and attached thereto. Fire department apparatus roadway access requirements appear to have been met. The drawings do not show exiting or proposed fire hydrant locations. Please provide details and information showing the location of existing or proposed hydrants based upon the following: Hydrants shall be placed so that all portions of exterior walls of buildings, measured along the outside and along access roadways, are no more than 500 feet away for "Working" Smoke Detectors Save Lives • • Mark Roberts January 15, 1996 Page 2 private residences or 250 feet for all commercial buildings (500 feet for commercially sprinklered buildings). Location of hydrants and supply piping to said hydrants for water supply, shall be approved by this office. There must be at least one hydrant within 500 feet of all portions of these structures. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 526 -2469 referring to file number 512 -95. Sincerely, ' ,Q Jerry L. Renfro, DFM Plans Examiner JLR:kw cc : V & M Consulting Engineers 7000 S.W. Hampton, Suite 123 Portland, Oregon 97223 • #CEIVED PLANNING DEC 1 99 P � , E, I` P . I EKED �._k►,� II� REQUEST FOR COMMENTS �� CITY OF TIGARD DEC 131995 DATE: December 7. 1995 TO: Lee Walker. Unified Sewerage Agency /SWM Program FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95 -0016 ➢ DAVIS PARTITION A request to partition one existing .49 acre lot into three (3) lots of 6,708, 6000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Multiple - Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - December 18. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible.. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written comments provided below: b I ; ( rah f) V7 �- L,�2 Sl �L0� i ( .A (2-xt«k 6CA-ic e . {,. ,64 2 a O D u )4 i • vim, 9)17761, iii tr\ 3 . Y S s Pzo l d Y► at Y2.1 UVLi. C5() Iris U 4 * (Please provide the folrawinginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: h L ( I Phone Number(s): Lc q- ` `6 Cow (1 MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • • • v\A.■6/ n it (A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: December 7. 1995 DEC 1 31995 TO: Ray Valone. Advanced Planning FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95 -0016 ➢ DAVIS PARTITION g A request to partition one existing .49 acre lot into three (3) lots of 6,708, 6000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Multiple - Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - December 18. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide thefolotving information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): , 3 3Co MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS DEC- 13 —'95 11:41 I DOT 2R TEL N0 :503- 29758 Si987 P01/01 :111,t.w\ IAnlur / - VVv REQUEST PAD PAIIMMPro'r f_ITV AC ; Iea4RD Post-1r Fax Note 7871 I 'e 1 17 -/ .- t'vapes To tievk &be t From /, e .SC 1 `(' DATE: December 7. 1995 °oiDaP`. co, Phone # Phone « 7-, l t' e Z TO: Bob Schmidt, ODOT /District 2A Fax" �' 7z q 7 Ftu M FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (603) 639 -4171 Fax; (603) 684 -7297 RE: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95 -0016 k_ DAVIS PARTITION Q A request to partition one existing .49 acre lot into three (3) lots of 6,708, 6000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Multiple - Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE. NEED YOUR COMMENTS MC& BY: Monday - DemnberAL.1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. if you are unable to_ respond by the .above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact __.. .,. _...., of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: /17 • 'It.° 4 erie veth e-4a 1^ (Es v' Pt -e' r ec` r rM . �... _._ .. 1 6Pttase provide the following iqfornuttion) Name of Person(s) Commenting / , Phone Number(s): Z 2 q• -f--42 Z - z 'r- 5r MLP 95.0016 DAVIS PARTITION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD TO: Mark Roberts FROM: Greg Berry r DATE: December 20, 1995 SUBJECT: MLP 95 -0016 Davis Partition The applicant proposes to partition a 0.49 acre parcel into three residential lots near the northwest corner of SW Hall Blvd. and SW Spruce Street. Findings: 1. Streets: Access is provided by a common driveway to SW Spruce Street; no access to SW Hall Blvd. is proposed. The frontage along SW Spruce Street, a local street, has existing right -of -way of 60 feet in width. The street is improved with an 18.5 foot paved width, but without curbs or sidewalks. SW Hall Blvd. is a major collector under ODOT jurisdiction. The frontage is improved with only a drainage ditch. Additional right -of -way to increase the width from centerline to 45 feet was provided by a previous partition. This parcel is subject to an agreement waiving the property owner's right to oppose a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Spruce Street and SW Hall Blvd. The parcels resulting from this partition should be subject to a similar agreement. 2. Sanitary Sewer: Sanitary sewer service is provided by extending a public line from the existing sewer in SW Spruce Street along the common driveway. 3. Storm Sewer: The applicant proposes to provide storm drainage by installing a private line from the common driveway to a ditch along SW Hall Blvd. This will require a permit from ODOT. Although the applicant has proposed to provide surface water treatment by a public detention pond along the north end of Lot 3, a fee in -lieu of the facility should be required. The pond as ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 1 • • proposed does not meet design standards and would place an unreasonable maintenance burden upon the City because of the small size of the site and difficulty of access. Recommendations: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY ASSURED PRIOR TO RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT WITH WASHINGTON COUNTY. 1. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Hall Blvd. or SW Spruce Street, or both. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171). 2. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, to perform work and discharge runoff within the right -of -way of SW Hall Blvd. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the City Engineering Department prior to issuance of a Public Improvement Permit. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639- 4171). 3. A joint use and maintenance agreement shall be executed and recorded on a City standard form for the common driveway and associated drainage. The agreement shall be referenced on and become part of all applicable parcel Deeds. The agreement shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to recording. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171). 4. Three (3) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Seven (7) sets of approved drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost estimate, all prepared by a Professional Engineer, shall be submitted for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171). 5. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements: A. Three mylar copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative. B. Copy of recorded boundary survey for site. C. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05) Washington County, and by the City of Tigard. ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 2 • • D. The Partition plat shall include a note prohibiting direct vehicular access to SW Hall Boulevard from Lot 3. 6. The applicant shall pay a fee in -lieu of an on -site water quality facility as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91 -47. IN ADDITION THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE COMMUN TX DEVELOPMENT CODE: THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE LIST. 1. SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement A. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider) shall: 1. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and 2. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant. B. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract. 2. SECTION 18.160.180 Bond A. As required by Section 18.160.170, the applicant shall file with the agreement an assurance of performance supported by one of the following: 1. An irrevocable letter of credit executed by a financial institution authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon; 2. A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the State of Oregon which remains in force until the surety company is notified by the City in writing that it may be terminated; or 3. Cash. B. The applicant shall furnish to the City Engineer an itemized improvement estimate, certified by a registered civil ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 3 • III engineer, to assist the City Engineer in calculating the amount of the performance assurance. C. The applicant shall not cause termination of nor allow expiration of said guarantee without having first secured written authorization from the City. D. 18.164.150 Installation: Prerequisite /Permit Fee 1. No land division improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans therefor have been approved by the City, permit fee paid and permit issued. E. 18.164.180 Notice to City Required 1. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. 2. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. F. 18.164.200 Engineer's Certification Required 1. The applicant's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade, prior the City acceptance of the public works improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCI ASSURED: 1. Provide the Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat; or if not recorded with Washington County but has been approved by the City of Tigard the applicant shall have 30 days after recording with Washington County to submit the copy. STAFF CONTACT: Renae Simmons, Engineering Department (639 -4171) 2. The applicant shall provide for roof and pavement rain drainage to the public stormwater drainage system or by an on -site system designed to prevent runoff onto the adjacent property. STAFF CONTACT: David Scott, Building Division (639- 4171). ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 4 • APPROVED Randall R. Wooley, Ci411 Engineer N: \ENGINEER \MLP95- 16.gnb ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION PAGE 5 • • e7A IAA6 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING OF TIGARD • DEC 111995 DATE: December 7. 1995 TO: Dave Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95 - 0016 ➢ DAVIS PARTITION A request to partition one existing .49 acre lot into three (3) lots of 6,708, 6000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Multiple - Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - December 18, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. X Written comments provided below: a � a..z rv\LP � (�ne \ o.� i a�co w\aa� ss kk9ks' ∎k3.�, 0 $.8. 5�8. . A\ so 1 _ . r.- SC Ct.∎/ .rs3 \ Ct- av� �.ro:. • . �o �.v �, s Zt - `Dk.00.\bt C) `0 5 \ ow Nr:& V \ � S Ca sc-d ow ‘a. cx-l.wA w e^r k a k . o`io9k1 'viva a5 5\. h- -`Ne, cmt _ \ 0-.a \r\cA v.,.crot -51, k o, &%eikae,< e (Sr \ & -- \) — � \.C,\ NNeja, � e-(trv;B.S:, .��o-e— eose 5 2 or 5� arv.■ .Q o\\ /N S Q; Q•z,) vve_ANS c" Q 3 ,S la* a •n \• .. (Please provide the farming information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: - C-3 A I Phone Number(s): Z) CrnncrQMnQB. �tN1'C 10 L \aS'�. >cts C\rje.(Rn\ •,(a cam, . 1\Y@a. MLP 95 -0016 DAVIS PARTITION ROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS & 3% k1sc i! -»S'ij • • 44 • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS , V n �, Pik CITY OF TIGARD V` RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: December 7. 1995 DEC 0 8 1995 TO: Kelley Jennings. Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 95 - 0016 ➢ DAVIS PARTITION A A request to partition one existing .49 acre lot into three (3) lots of 6,708, 6000 and 4,829 square feet and a Tract -A for street purposes. LOCATION: 8735 SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S1 35AD, tax lot 3400). ZONE: Multiple - Family Residential (R -12). The R -12 zoning district is to provide for single - family and multiple - family residential units. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.88, 18.102, 18.108, 18.150 and 18.164. . Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - December 18, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: t , We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (p&ase provi4 the following information) Name of Person(s) Comment d `�P I Phone Number(s): 6c 2_� 6 1 i MLP 95 - 0016 DAVIS PARTITION PROPOSAL /REQUEST FOR COMMENTS -- --- - ---, , - 74:' . _ - „_ .. , ,„ .. f.47 - , _f ,_ -- . --...—.. -r , -, ... .,.s, ., • ' , , , ;e:..""e !:.,',..- ,,` ...,:- ' -,'--.' '7 ■, . ',„,,*, „ ,. 7 '-1,■'''' - ,i: 1 ' ',: - , " '. - 1 '‘-'..- " ' '.; ' ' ,■:- ' . ' " , ',';-', ..,:. -1.. g' ' , ''..: , .- - , , , • 1 ' t , ‘, „ 4, " e ' ' "..N, ' ' '"` ''' ' t -',,'' ' - ' ' ', , ..,' t '' : - '' . ' .„ 4 • '' ' - ' '-, - ' ,-. '` '' • ; ''4 4 ' / ' ' * . . $ ' ' * , ' ' ; • ' , , '. .:'' , , ' ,.' . ' A , ' . '' =`;:;';',; , ', : - ' - ' ' .. . ; '‘' T, 'i" ' :::;--:;" , ' ' ' ' - ' ' '. : -• ' - s '' '''''"' ' '''. - ' : ' : ' ' 1*- 4 ' , i , ,-_,. '''.: ' ■ . , , ' . ..... , ,.. .i„„, 16221 e - itt: F it 12-31-9i I . _ 1 4 1 , ., ..,, , ' .., V ' _ REGON , il . D v ....., II i . 7;... ''' L 0, T ,...„ , . J A\ ' iri T:1 • IN , ' ', , ACCO , . cz, r irfj ==1 jrnifITIW . 1.. . ., , , .... v) f Y - , (X .(E - X -- ....5 . (4 Z , 1 - El „.. (01, 1 c ---- L, - 1 7"---% ( F —I • li .-- s P\/ / - , \ / v) , 1 ) , ,), 1 ---- ...._.) > 4 r ,,,„,,-? 13 \ \, j , 1..■......— CO . L.-Li r T ..... i ,.............] / \, i'= ///\ R D , . . u 0 1 ..), s .. ., , ____ . . , L3 z . . - . , n ii„ce ' 0 • ,' • , r------- 1 r.) ili 2 114j tii U ',!' 1 -■ L ' - I.-- ‘ r rN. z ,(7, .,, i . . . , g in /.--\ Hk 111 1----1E- 1 _ , . . \ / \ 1 „„,?, G E ill NI IIE D /A\ ,, / i c . ,,_._,.....__ . , , t ,/ ,______.) , , . ,.., ,,.. ' . 11) e: AI . . - W ' 1 4 1 GENERAL NoTEs o 0 -. . _ ...... . „ II - -. ..,,-.,,, ,--- r.''.. . , " f '''': V 4..' • : '' 1 - = ' "-- ` ' - ' ,'",, ,.. ,'', r '"-- , ' 't ,, ' " , ' : C — - , - . .; -- ' ' , ' 1 .-- I ,a - * % • .. L All existing a ft conditions and elevations shown on these plans ' . .. Pi k o l" 11-1 ......„ • ..$ „i. __ ......_ , . are from a survey completed b V $ 1°1 Consulting Engineers, Inc. on • , - • January, R uary, /995. The CONTRACTO shall visit the site and verfry all , , ti „hi 0e, , .....” , -, ' Y existing conditions and elevati As to his 6 ati$Faction. _ INDEX - ,..„ ,...., , . .....,,. , , , _ - .,, - , t 2. All work .51-7all conform to the applicable specifications, codes s- C-1. COVES SHEET 0_ "co and requirements of the City of Tigard, Wahington County Land C , _4 X . . . C-2. SITE PLAN LI . , 6C t Trans Tran O sportation ept., the Unifi tli ed eerage Agency, the •,..• - -- 1 ,.. -- _-_i inns . -. ;07.— .. _ City or Tigard Water Opt. and the 1991 edition of the Oregon 5.1.1). aptRuca 6T. gja cl . C3 ROSION CONTROL 4 GRADING • State Plumbing Specialty Code. It 6;1611 be the responsibility of , (I R such the CONTRACTO to discov o er and cmply tuf ,th all require- sire , . C4. STORNI 4 6.5. PROPLE5 0 , - 1 ,.' . r- ment6-obtain and pay for all permits required for work Shown on • C-5. PRIVATE DRIVE PROFILE . 1-.... (f) . these drawings. ) .. --..t C-6, DETAILS , .3. To protect underground utilities, Contractors performing work -,- , , shown on these plans must notify utilities and public agencies at - A - . i g.q---4:1 0 , . ,,, 3 ' least 40 hours, but not more than 10 business clays, berore begin- CITY CV TIOART) . \ - 2 cl CI 4 , nirg excavation, in accordance with the provisions of OILS 151.541 ,..,‹ `-- 1 .2 to 157.51/, for premarking. Pothole all crossings <66 necessary be- .) ,...., . F' A I ' : 12oloo4a T PI : ,F.5 0_ A (i'; Fore construction to prevent grade and alignment conflicts. Call - ? . 246-6 For utility locates. 0 i 1.-; 2 - 4. Any alteration or variance from these plans, except minor Field , 0,ii c* GI g adjustments to meet existing conditions, shall First be approved BASIS FOR ELEVATION -i • b ,Iliti I „..._,.„.„.r.-i--7 .!'"- - '. -- - - -- . - --; - , - - - - - - , y th e City Engineer o r hi s representative.. An9 changes to cii .__ ---- these plans shall be documented (:;n construction Field prints and N .3& 05/40 E3C 1 1, c transmitted to the developer's Engineer. ,---. ... aUJ CONCRETE E3OX CULVERT • _...1 La, 5. The CONTR,4CTOR 611.311 submit a traffic control plan and obtain L N AR OF 3 0 4 A uj, K C. 1 ) Nr. 1 • iti fAJI , i , - -, z 1 i,,, approval prior to any work within the right-of -way, Approval by - . Hi (02);1 ..1 , both the City of Tigard and Washington County will be required. E .1) I - V _ • • VI --i - , - (3' , I , F - ,- x I . K 1 g , o . 0 iff-' 1 P , . . i 0 1 . 3 ' • . - ,. . - - - 1 4 , 2 I • .. , . 11 > i o. i .- 13 , - , , . , ,--- . R 0 1 : i , 17101 . P . . , • ... ., ..- ... r-40137 ,. . , , - 4 , - , , C-1 - i , ---, - . . . , . _ . „ , _ , , ...... .;;.. , ..„. .....,. ....,..._ _ .. _____,. . _ . n 4 - , , • , ' . .„ , , , , ., , . •,' 1 I , , , , ' „ , _ , , ' " ,.., ' i if , ' ..f ' ''' I .�a _ KA _ - p. • A l ' 3 u • ~ m~9' - 3 i< 4 b _ - _ a i u • } J p g' ' t v � - Y.v 5 - - • �y .. .T i v - fi - - ' a•"' ^ - + ,v `�- - a _ 2 • � ' J < ±_.. }•.., F .T.; -r y....N.- a .. ... -..a Y - :.,.: ... :.. _. ti. , r LG, ` ! l ! /!1 • E c siftworp i • , • n LEGEND ORIGINAL GRACE Q 179 FIAII�N GRADE ,a r ;_ a s£ , �'QL� r ° 20 ` :: > ,,J ,19iv9, : '.' . , , Enos___ CW!l` HOoL MOTES: !I1I 1. The Filter fabric shall be purchased in a continous roll cut • _z 1 - to the length of Then barrier to avoid use of Joints. en . i --; 1 , Joints are necessary, filter cloth shall be spliced together % �\ , , CY _ : � '' only a t a support post, with a minimum 6 -inch overlap, and 1 w m Z U = “s both ends securely Fastened to the post, or overlap 2x2 “ - F'ROT CT TJ E WI TI-� \ } \ q 0 • _ posts and attach as shown on detail sl' -et X -1. ie' 01,4 GEO/ ENT FENCE. \ i `� ` t [ 1 Y ) }. 2. The filter fabric Fence shall be installed to follow \ ' • the contours ADO i �- ti. ; where feasible. The fence posts shall be spaced a maximum 4 \ • - F .:, of & feet apart and driven securely into the ground a • , , �` j j (1) 2 ” , _.4. ° mimimum of 24 inches. . ti - r ' t$. =180,16 1 tN _ 1 I --- 3. The filter Fabric shall have a minimum vertical burial of c / - � � o � � 1 118 FLOOR- , (I 16 All excavated material from filter fabric fence to � a , 1 , installation ghatl be backfill and com acted alon the p Lai = 6E0/at / / 1 I l� t entire disturbed area. _. i ; t.J C• fr 1 06,1 180 _,.., 1 ;1 4. Standard or heavy duty filter fabric fence shall have c t77 f . /! Q manufactured stitched loops for 2' x 2" post installations. , ' . e p p 1 1— t or 3 f 6708: 4gp • • i - • Stitched loops shall be installed on the uphill side of i a � ' 1 r :y " 1 17s ; �- . 'Y , II the sloped area. = la ra2 r 1 Q' 1 [1 �t " / ° '\ } . C , 1 j ; V) L J z 5. Filter Fabric fences shall be removed b the general ' 1 1 ._ I i , �/ : contractor when they have served their useful purpose, C . t 80 i \ ill •� but not before the upslope area has been permanently C - ..1e0.1 ; 1 ! �` �3 :' • protected and s tabilized. y_. 171 Q� i f F F s i ! ' } � i, Q Pi &, Filter fabric fences shall be inspected by applicant /contractor ri 1e0 . / immediately after each rainfall and at least dail y during ;. 17967 • --I -- 3 4 era - e6 . 119 e prolonged required p rolon ed rainfall. An uired re airs shall be made slags I re4cr 179.70 1 6 immediately. � jaw y, 171 180 06 179.92 _ J ) .^r= 119.81 ././7 i , v ri t 118rD 09.91 f ' :-- a RADMG NO TES FROTECT ALL ADJACENT F'ROFERTIE9 _ , _ . / i \ 1 3 1 , (WTI -1 A TOTAL OF 702 LF 5EO/t LENT FENCE. f T 7,03 • E n I 1 r i DETAIL SNI T r ( DO n 1. F'ro�lect grading miss shat be all property lines and street I , r1 ht -of -wa unless otherwl5e shown on laps. I \ 9 y �' sr 51D xrl, t � i • • 1 ,c1 ` 2. A11 construction are shall be 5 tri pp ed of topsoil. The removal i .' [03 ' \ 0 II Exrsr lPFSrlEr'riAL ! ! T 'i i r � of unsuitable materials shall be done in cansultatlon with the Clty 2r � Engineer or his repreeen t a t i ve. ! �- - 3. The CONTRACTOR shall have appropriate compaction tests con- y I �� .� , \ f � ` • fi� c, - ducted and approved by a 5olls Engineer retained by the CON- .�, ``, ' }- Y TRACTOR All test results shall be forwarded to the developer's ` © RO�ID ,� TRAU/ F. 3AL f3 . l �R \ ?�,�, `° • Fn ine er. � -r � . AT END OF 9EDI °TEN F ENCE / . ,,, ' , t � � �- 1 '\ , ,;ti \' 6EE DETAIL .�I --IEET 6 / ® . 4. Friar to placement or fill materials (excluding areas to receive . ,; \.;`;a l - / } g fill rock), any excessively soft or wet areas e during strip- mow - --- - me o \ _ Ali' � � G ping or thereafter shall be removed as determined by the engineer �, 7- 1 , q. iris before the next lift is placed and compacted. ` � ` —1 ; f C 5. All rill material s hall be placed in layers not to exceed (a) eight i\ fF , , inches loose thickness and'sha I1 be compacted to a density or a t •�' - E P , i r7'1.a9 ' `yya9 / ttl c � I lea (92) ninety -two percent of the modified proctor maximum dry JN5 L L 5� ! � ;� x 2' AY - - f - - - I s 6/ RAVEL . density and shall have a moisture content not g reat e r than (4) four - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - w :i u c - i - „ - -- - - -- - r - - - c • percent above the optimum moisture content, CON TRUCTION ENTPANCE. 8 � J i ` Q L T - \ siP 5 e TAIL 5 � T.. ra 6.. The upper 2' of all fills within the paved areas shall be compacted _ �7a \ 17 8 I t= i f • • to (95) ninety -five percent of the modified proctor maximum dry • • • \ ' EXlsrrrr�l7/rcN \ 1 density and have a moisture content not greater than (4) four per- 11 cent above the optimum moisture content. \ -t -- N R 0 (1) ROA, N 7. Non structural fills shall be similarly placed as materials for structural \ �rz ©�'Gr : fills, excepting that the material shall be compacted to a density of ' • ` (05) eighty -Five percent of the modified proctor maximum dry density. 1 ,7101 .. , . ' = - a4gar. '' , — 3 , °, s - , _ ° r ~ E �v{ -P - - - - c£ r e€ `•s'f - }`mvtl' .. •. J u • , - a , J • . Y , - t: , Vic' , ✓ 8 • - - a ",, _ r _ s `S J ��+ ' _ - _ ... ', 1 Y - n - - - _ - 9;.• 4 .•d , $ - _ r . + ' s � - r '�l , .� .p - , - .. t £"r:. _ . _ -... [ - _ _q'`tr v .♦ _,k_ _ _ AM. { i - 1 m m A 1 • t 11 • i 1 s • F I, . ! i Co r. j ■ ,i 1 1 } I 1 , r i - 1 1l} , • u 9. oos I 95 30' _ ' I ,L118 w N00'00'00'E I T r 1 n i iT� x r 1 { IE -0-- r I ' (1 i I k / N i ` ` h ($ I ' , �► NJ 1 I ± 7 z Imo— �i $ no_ f f R j 1 , h e' H I 1 a a 1 .' di------4! I • • aVf I • � ) •••••• .......• mac. .�� .�� ..�.. & m•y � '� 1 N00'00'00'E w 76,70' . 1 .t v. [ 1 t■ r ,. .. N . coo o3•4' W i .4er 1 o 1 o • I • Z , t w � ��. . � $ ' to "...i $ `° % . 1 63.7 LP ,W 7 ~�cs � ---04- , � �'s, 1.4. 8 8 r 1 • (fin NC/0'00'19'E M1A lay i ° { i Z ( 1 a N00 76.70 " I i I 0. . ' �.� • ,�,...� 10427 .� .� � � ry • j I I I..__-. 1 0 <. +1 III A I O I 101 ; ) W _ I A . r 1 { p 2 1 i L . t� 1. y i I M '�� �Y i 5 f I , . , ----A I : i I `„fin • K • r ' t . ' it " III " • ?,. i r.�..�..... ..... '$4.6.4` r.� • 1 1 soao , ' SOOO4 R1 r ' ' ' + ° a, :r ;. "' a f _."4 3' FX/STiNG DITCH — _� �-r-- -- -- ✓" _" .-, --- - �- ' - `1" , .. , „ i \ ___,.______.-------- i \ \ � � - fir._ ,......._� ,p A ... , ___..--, 0 A V 9 . . r y !`- •"""� -- ter �`......,..,,,, /...� -. - „ ____ . _____. , ,. ____,_____,. ,___,..... ._, ...,_ .. ............., .. . .44.....,,,,,,, , ,,,, , ,.... . . .,.,.., ,..„....„.... i r . . , _,„ „, ,,, ., 7 _ / , . ...____......,/...........,....„....._, *, _. , , : "; . . ,....„„..„,„„,,..„..4r,4 .„.„ . , , 1 . 1 ,, ' 1 - . _ ` „. 1 < 1{ .. i• .1 I ; j { i ,' i t ' • • _ . r • 1 _, r Y 4 • h„ r - , rr I f K • 0 4 .. ! 0 • onamil. p IF zXXV x x x x c D Dv'i D O 0 z R,-- ,,, 1I • 0 c ,' i n ? r > K _ m g s p —I m E ,..< CO O 4 E z 1 " , §. ., x. o z rn z rn Z m rn �' m ` m - 4 m m ,, A D3 Co w • 1.,„ r 4 '*4 1— - . . • , 1 - . Y v (.v w , � � GL I �ti'T� �2. G x Jv`� ' L. D.4 Yl:v, :.. T,- TG��`'7�vGN ,a ,vor�o R E V I S I N S , " 4 k « � 1 SCALE NO DATE REMARK J }, 0 0 �i . /� /� �f � DESIGNE a ,�� N a, , ' ; , ...i, Q , F 1 M 1 ..—„ , L"1�,' " 1 /ur s' ° '�^ ` ' '' " ; a i< ,� fi r. ` " �, �` 1� L� .� 1°p ^ ' �; _+bd� —__ _s�iuG �1..__t Lu�J�� �'s�J e�J�a ( y Q —. _ - - —_ °� DATE' tir 'V 0!23/°5 .1111 ' IOC . .W. 6119440, ��ri . * s r� OrGan , Or X722 a MOS? 0� -: "' SITE FLAN • ci vU e • • marine engineering • • etructural engineering ` . CHK'{� xa ' c «f ~d ax ' " ' , J* 'SE . Gn. n ten{ , � M 1 , 3 , r r Y' u 1 � 'h a , 1 ='b "da ° o� .M,a ., �y;� �.� ti,* "k s 4i Y ` -, xa' °' art a °�a�& t '.a a'+n < w"'" .r' hY'`, r Y. r, $.y!'.* »s} i? , • g' „i',. trr a ".v a 'l0.,'= *xo?� r ,. a a • r4 RW" - � a _ U _ ,... .. _ „ .r ..e. a . .... ..,. au; .. w..s,.wn.�s..., as tw'w -.°° ac. ' :�, ,v .. :b "^,M .t mw w Mw_:zparav«misn,x �,•',z'.' >errat, a.a'�ua;,a . cSZeas;ri+ar �� ".'� . � r .a<'r�"'sTM°:`'i: -vr� c „w '^ay,, „. - _ x _ _ , -- - -- r. "'- - r ' F. r , _ P ` < r .. i « #. a .> - - rar•7'� _, �' - - �,�� a .i . I . - • 7 ° , - _ _ s y=. _ i _ .a ' . A - 7 ' ,- - - _ a • . . fir' ' - I a r r 10 16'2;1 . A,> . , ' k ` ^ r 12781 -95 _ °n ” _,' • C l • C t, 19 4., \ii. - 0 \\ --?1,-;!.; rot " 14:4 1 s . / a LOT J bPJ@l 5F , - - � � - 3.� r . .;.--= � ,� , I �� �� + ran :...,„,;, 1 1 . . , 1 ...,,, es - ... t ` ' , kk, o rNSTALL err { ttlaterlln3 Sta. 1 +37 ' -*, 1 'L . !' Cor stop w/ 25 L.P. copper sv f • • 1 Dau Meter set by City. I/ i • ,., \ 1 0' 20' , 40' 60' 80' 1---+ p , INSTALL - - - -- t terf/n s Sta. 1+4l ; • W Standard 2' Blow Q "ss........„ . „ ,,,,,,.....,,,.....„....„..........„,....„„ '4T ; rRACr 'A' 1 ``' , . —.Ns\ kt le • r-- ...., ____, , , , , , \ r IN3rALL. \ F:=::::' . I rx Qua c ' al j � UJateellre 8ta. 1 +16 LEGEND �' La A z cc, .1--- u X a � 1 Co atop w/ 44 1.F. copper svc \ 4 . -1z(-" ®� > b A 1 Meter set exi Ci ty. 0 v w , EX/5t RES/GET/TIAL 1 111 I , \ CENTER LINE 1 ' a I < ' EX/5 RE5104NNAL Q • -�°- PROPERTY LINE Imo} 1. • . C.:g = ( _ � - • _ • ROW. il CE ` \ o Q co., POWER POLE '�1 1 .,. ca 1 . t ❑ CATCH BA 'e< i 0+ I • a ) SEtGER $ WATER i J .14r. ' 4l�r 5CRN8ED # 81 GATE VALVE A5 TRACT D G n . j • 1 THRUST BLOCK _ _ ... � � � � � • '® BLOW OFF � � I, ,� :' - ,... , _ / \ } _ a LYNCH CATCH BASIN ' 4 WA TER MET ` �' _ I 1' GAS LINE , : ' # . 1- 0.... E /F A:2:s l, r q SANITARY MANHOLE 4 >4"'" ; ft ‘% orminarem11--SEIMIKERM STORM ; Al 8' CONCRETE 5 `� F S EWER c� SANITARY # - -3 ........4 .. p D S . W . SPRUC ST o . - 1 �2�o r WATER LINE - ` ' _ E/. ZIP • - E/P - . - j - I (� A 4' DAP N20 8" Or 1420 CURB if' • E.<ITING DI r EXI$l/I�,L D/TGN _ __ ° ry , ' L 1VE r 4l� E XIST. 8' ©.1.P, EX UTILITY 3 Waterline 3ta. 0 ' Field locate exist. water main EX WATER LINE : ;'' lui, , 8" x 4' tapping tee (FL) _ .pU.ai. - gags valve (FLxt`�,7i'°' EX SANITARY SEWER ( Concrete blocklnq) _s EX EDGE OF PAVEMENT t .• O ;' ° \ .• r r F 0e - - - -- - - - -- - - - 1 182 r .,, K, , .., 1 1 FINISH G DE 0 SEWE r t 0,1 6 .., 4 a ( 3 f I +� j I I c a ct SUL SF E ST. 180 -- _ _ 1 _ -- - - - - _ - • - 180 „ I V . . 0 IL 182 — — — - 182 118 �' 1 18 r w (E I i a I--- + f –1 1 1 0 U1 ! 1 1 " 4 -I 1 1 1 ! PLC' IIcfi ti -461 1 i FINISHED GROUND i i— 0 {- } N i 0 180 E3. = 18.16 i _ 1 _ _ I - 1 ir 1 1 a • T 5 FI�EEBt1AR1� ^ 1 1�6 11 5 CD ' - IE. - 11 . 6 o vERF I i ST 1 TO LE '1' 2 L LE. 1?8.1� !LI7 SET `C/ b a L f�IM cu 118 , = 5 - PLTEIV iii FLUOR AR 8 - L L _ _ - - - -= 1�8 114 --- _--- -- - 4 - - - t.E: EX IN EAST = iii .51 - -- - - - - - - -- -- r- _ " - -- - -- - - - INSTALL 30 1 4 LA * 3 =8.3 0 - • 114 ill _ :�= • -{ 1 I,E, 6' IN i4ORTM = 111.61 _ 1- " 1-- " I,E. = 114.2? � � s a` `' 1 I I,E EXIST j 8' 1 Z 111 ' co W • 1 k 1 L1"1� 1 G.E3. (FIELD VERIFY) - ` -- - 1 STA. 0+00 A - I T.G. 1 9.61 � iRECEA E $TRUGTUF OUTFACE _ ro' _ _ 7 NORTH = -1.1 1_ PY �.. 116 OUTFACE I = t1 16 _ - _ 1. E: = f18.1fa - _ _ 1�6 i12 _ � _ ; z^ k.F ' A87M_I�- �?''� at Ss 59' Q �. I.E. = 118 (SEE DFTAIE SHEET 6 ll2 r o d �' _ _ �� ___- $t� �Et1l t . I a 11 IN31T LI.. STD MANNO1,E e 0 - 1 1 , - RIM 180.13 -�_ , � - I.E. 4 IN NQRTl -1 = 114 2 1 1 __I DA�UM ELEV -_ - -_- _ -- - - - -- _ -- . __ _.-- - - - - -_ _ - -- _ �_._ -_ __. _ -__ -- _____ -- -_ ! _�_ -- _._. - _ -- _- -_ -- _ _- .__ -_ -- -- _ -_ -__ _ _ -_ __ -- 174 DATUM �LEV E ._ . _. _ 110 __ _ -- _ __ I E OUT 50U71•°I 11� 23 a U • 174 ,. 1'�D F- ' RO � EG?, 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 , 0+00 0+50 1+0 1+50 . 17101 ''ate � ,,r,, e ►� �.,, I / '. V> al p SMO 8��� E1: 1' = 20 v: 1' =2' C , - a - _ r i° e - e ' , , - . .r_ r' - . .° v - - e 1,.- _ :: r _ F_+. r a a , _ t • , - - - x pp _ ♦ , _ ' V e s • - i.'F. a -a " • nn _ �: _ n -^' - w ' ' f* e i _ �: SY a - t t .�a < • a _ . - ' 1. Y • A 0. 1. l f , 'r' , aF 1 1 } 1 `, O re , I 1 . • I a i i ± ' 1 w I i i i • I I ! i 1 i t ^ , I. ( 9 I 5.W. SPRUCE ST = # S.W. i -•JILL �3LYD 1 , 1 I _______� EL = IS fo I I I t 1 _ � I i I _„ I " i , , i i f { t , 1 i k I 3 i S ` ill! I r i I -,,,,..0 % 1 i I 1 i j 1 i I i z 1 I , I ! 1 i ■ i i k ; 1 ; w '� r rR I r t I 1 a: I I ■ 1 , ' 1 i m ti • i --._� _ -•••• -. _.__ t ---- l / , _ r .�. _f.�._ _.._. .a W ` j ,, , , 1 I rn , i • 1 n » .,, t l ! i 1. rn ; n ,,,, > I i I 2 i r 1 �` t t r .,' 1 1 I I du j i I , t 1 I I � 1 i w A ., . . „ ir e ; ., -•' . A I Y _ f N f i , i ' '� �\ 77 1�, ! J ,,' a Fy ' . ..'. °,�. 1 t 1. ; , , • .ij . ; ! ' , 1 I t g ..�* .�..."- '•`_.- .}'-"_ -_ -- 1 `. } W �►� \ a. tj } � r�,t,,J 'a s r }" � t '.1 P i i rj 1 1 1 I 1 4 I > .,r i• _ r•„ ,t ./ 0 411 ,. e ...., i , , , ,,, „. , , .„,,, : ..;_-1„ ,„, • . t ! s., 1 5 � + i l Csy w • . . cs, 4. II �9 2 0 ' i1,lJDF PRIVATE DRIVE' . ; - r '� M ` : ' •.� ' .. et a J+ ?1.29 I 'Q _ i -I I ! I �I ' Y 4 7' ii. ,��, ! • -' I = N !� i 1 n { ■ j T 1 1 h4, . xr'h:''e' Gre ke''' _ '' till t � ' IN i i IY s •' � ,, ... • • i a . ■ • • ■ ;, ! l f � ` =' a _ , h i r e . I u, ' ' , f / 1 _....__.___._._.— t— ...._.._ -_.. -. t _.- f • ... i ._... .,^, • ! J- • ■ • - �..... -` �. K .- ..�...r- ,.- _.__- ...... ._.. _._........__..,._.__......_. -. _- .,..�__.- .- _ ... -.. - , --- -_- -- --_ ' «`_...�.___...,J • - v. I 1 /� {� 1 • ■ l --�- —.. 1 l f .._.._____ r __- _-.—__ —_ —__ _ 1 ` • I I ■ 4 } . ' , t., . = r v . , • ' I , • .. . V - /+ r � - r v }� y 1 " r /� , 04.5 N'OTErD REVISIONS CL'�f`T: �. a./r+�rvl�, L. T0t f1 .r� ®T �'�`rTl r iVJ\ ' * SCAL NO DATE REMARKS (SI i i `�.� d .w v�`ir �rr�T. T t �i+ rs/ e-7.223 L�r. $AN � � • r` �� l a :4x DESIGNER N 0, r • ..._ i I ;,+ �'• on 3/ z Li; Li C 1:1" L G' I _ L I - � U7 , ' ,• [7,77) , cV�``' 6--.,_•••3 it n ' J , P a r • 0 m _ _ _ -- = _ /23/95 w ,�° t , �F �1 (� 7u"�vw1 , .6 : G i'n wtiChro Ziiito T At P abed, ar u� i,722 650.71) s� -:d +:+ ENTRANCE JP DA y `� `� , h, �,i — yi a . .-.-...-- -...-...- , ______ 1 —...-..-.....4 a. • ;civil engineering . %, marine engineering • structural engineering ' AND ' � �# '� YJG� ■ r .r ■ _ , k . >' . 1, 2.','',' /4 l,d ,g .� rr ., ■ .h., r. ' rJ " t ' r x - b ■ ' y 4 b q, y { r r 6 ^l� X ` ^k 4 . -, +l • .a b A > Ik ,;••.,1 p : ; +'fk.° q"`!f ^"a.. M,r^• i r A _ ` F.4" fir. .7 a ,. = 'e h '� . _ . m :y ^3 ..t :! ,n ''; sn d ' L , x a , "M �u 'i . ,. .^'�5 :; "�' - . , _..- +6e.�_ _ . a *7 ' w4 ..^V "" ry p - _ c if'` r . p z -r. 0 r rt _ • a fi i vy; g - - �4 , � y s r y,l •�Y tii ,4 \ r ' 4 h - r • 1 - ■ v v F1' - xr y _ _ x ' j ,Y� , ,'« t o ' v r ir _ _ y �: .5. ` u Y v ,� `4 c..- a • : u • • , fi . - �• , , r , : 1 1 , ", . ; ,'. ; A l� 7 , , , 1 N OTES ^ ' THIS TYPE OF MANHOLE SHALL EE USED ONLY FOR PIPE SIZE OF 24' OR LESS. STEPS C _ il, - 4 ' , ( ' , _ .„ _ j . ,' , G. YERT/CAL CURB r , , 4 6' �x cstar� 6 k' ; MAIN SEVER LINE • I p ago SLOPE . e _: ,. ..tea - + i AND F I OVER LEDGE T • , � } 'O � • � p � � ` t----1 A , ` + OF AT LEAST Is' IN wIDT{4 FRlYATE • DRIVE •-f),, • - -D. a -o. ; - o • . • . > ° • MATCHED FINISHED GRADE OF STREET - - D• • c. .Q • O i • CA$T IRON COYER AND FRAME p' • • O• . + (SEE STANDARD PLAN) NOTE: COAT ALLvURFACE$ 1N51PE 4 OUT ` CxRATE - D -D -- 4 CO nCr ett s _' BET FRAME IN w!Tu ASPHALT PAINT 2. 3, . • " / �: ` . ` NON- SHRINKING GROUT 4 ->� Gru hed f cc k )-- . +, S. s MAXIMUM 21' FROM IA egg �` 1 - r 12 l'? ► y ' N TOP OF FIRST STEP ♦ • TO TOP OF CASTING — 4< [3. ECCENTRIC NOTES: + }, STANDARD o --., M4N -4OLE TOP • 43' V r 0 } RISER PLASTID !.MATE 1 CONCRETE SHALL BE A COMMERCIAL MIX. z . _ . • ,' MANHOLE R — �JEAL 4 GASKET CAST IRON GRATE 2. PANELS TO BE 5 FEET LONG. 1 4B FOR PIPE UIVDISIUIED 3. EXPANSION JOINTS TO BE PLACED AT S1DES OF DRIVEWAY APPROACI. J Z • = ;, ,r' - ° .,� w ,4 OR LEO EARTH ?$' � � + ©`t 3 to 1- 1 � z � ` a. = 178.51 UTILITY VAULTS, La- EELCI.141R RAMPS, AND AT SPACING NOT TO Z o [\ Q �v Q � •ti • .h,4 ill Z 60' FOR PIPE .. .; •� v ► N ( p Q` ; E 21 ' OR L • ' ' r a;' COMPACTED �r . R ;P � o < S o ; ; . e • z . EXCEED 45 FEET. ;11 . a• 314' - 0 117 � � °r TEE ► 12' MAX FOR CONCRETE PIPE f ∎ - �.� .` �� GRSJ3HE IiOGK. • 4• FOR SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO TI -4E CURS AND POURED AT THE SAME TIME AS Nt , ,,,■ ,� _ _ � � , , THE CURB THE JOINT BETWEEN THEM SHALL BE A TROWELED JOINT WiTN A •. , yt '` • 0 .r1 ,, v STORM INE 11 . 1 _ 11 . MINIMUM l a' RADIUS. 24' . 5. SIDEWALK SHALL HAvE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 6 INCHES IF MOUNTABLE .: ,' ..a OIMIA. of aika „ C x .a.�y.... - ° r • ' b d FLEX)BLE COUPEIN PLAN ELE Y �4�'ION CURB 15 USED, OR IF SIDEWALK 16 INTENDED AS PORTIQN OF DRIVEWAY. N 5 Et M FRESH H HA A MINIMUM T 4TCKN S OF 4 INCHES A • INSIDE DROP MAXIMUM ro' J CONCRETE AND OTHER1�JJiSE_3fDELUALK 5 ALL YE ES . r z VERTICAL DISTANCE, GROUT - T INVERT To IN 6'0' MINIMUM „ LAYER COMP 6, D RAIN BLOCKOUT ' IN CURBS SHALL BE EXTENDED TO BACK OF SIDEWALK WITH 1t I F . BASE MATERIAL(3 /4'-0) ACTED h - • ! a m < 3 ' DIA. PLASTIC PIPE AT 2% SLOPE. GONSTRUGTlON JOINT TO BE PLACED = ` • „ °< STANDARD MANHOI.E . .. # • • DYER C ! PIPE. - �r � 1 f 11 0 . - ` l u S <,, .. 0 M_ . , .� t • . kii r• 0 CUT OVERFLOW . ' . , ' 1 u 1 .. - ' , _A + 0 1 !.3 ABOVE FL oo�z _ M „...., 1 2 I . . . 7 c . 0 ,,nn - STITCHED LOOPS « l� ; OVER 2'x 2' POSTE Q_� ;) ; ' tv� I s - , FILTER 36' w D RO ATERIA r COMPOST B ARRIER FILTER \` 0 J , I `,� 411'0010111 J/1 MATERIAL e t-5 `I V 1 . ' : . 0.4. ? i, j) £ t i I ( ; COMPOST BARRIER ; ” * ' 1 r3 • — f- AP PROX. 15'x 3' II ' 1 fi ~ , • , ___-_.4 ,,„._-_,__ ,„..„_ ' ___.„.„.,,, ti.- ____ i • G' CAP ir . �. r • • . • - d • ' AI icr:_i 1 '� - • ' •_, • - s ;�: FRONT YIE(! S ;' 1 , � , �� R =�� MIN , • ' * ... ' _1 i _ $UeC FADE RE `• O r - - - ill- -'4 ' g INFpRCEMEN G O� l 6 X 4 TEE s 1/2' P14 ORIFICE _ �, �EOT xnL , AS QUiRED • ' mss ` „ � i� , ' - � , - ' ' TEE l ! TTOM) _ — `p � (PR ILL L SO __ CLEAN pit RUtJ OR 2' MINUS GRAVEL Ss" TO ENSURE 301E IS TRAPPED FABRIC NOTES: , `V' b _ v .. � " • . (OR LARGER A$ NEEDED) 0 1 , . - o . ' s �,.. ..fly. i. DRIVE WHERE FABRIC ON "- , b ....,- .f,..:;64.-;°;••::. e . POSTS CONTACTS GROUND. �� "�� -- . � � � �T-?� ,�.- - - Tr - - CG 1POT UPHILL SIDE CF FENCE. Z ADD COMPOST BARR TO �•J ' •, / ` � i _ = 3' C1 `B' A m alt Gcncrete INTERLOCK BARRIER / x a . P08T5 ARE 2'x 2' FIR NOTE: 6i- 1A1+'E� SIZE, ANC) PLACEMENT OF GRAVEL C0N5TRUGTIO }. QdtRAtJGES AS 2'x 2` POSTS 3 ? ' 5CN 40 PVC 2"4"-0' Crushed Rack ' 6440(!14 !N EROSION ' CONTROL PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND VARY LATH AND JOIN —� PINE OR STEEL. !' C ,tY , , , , 6' !1' ?'-0' 1534$6 Rock - SITE CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING. TOP 1�IELU 4- STITCHED LOOPS TO FACE f • ; ° '• 00111\1HiLL SIDE O FEtice __ , + „ " r; ; - - 5. COMPOST A3 SPECIFIED —1 ' . SECTION ®2216 --_ , IN U RELEASE ST UCT rI- p«,�l• PRIY, rs C IV a `orIOU + J '1 1�1 N 1rIEN 7` FENCE �. •.�.. 143 r . Nr i -°-•-- Nrd N T$ IPRp•) ao r , . 17101 xt , r - i 531 4 t T3 r = • s. - ` ° n - _ , >• • . , ,, " '‘. . • r • , . ,-. .,, , ' ... . . . I . i . [ I • I i _ 1 I _ I I - I I 1 ,- II I 1 1 I , . .1 , I . , . [ . i l a [ . Il , ' ' . . Il i , , 9 5 . 0 ' , , I i 1 4 II , 7 Z... .. I . 0 ' , '-. '-‘ 1" J' ', . ' , --) • 7 II I I I I ' — , 0-, i , 1 . (s..> ...,, r - . . 1 - I 0' - CI ) I , -.-- „ -I - 7.!,,, ri- . 11 r. . :1 ( .I., . '.s.... II , r■ s' /It _ 7 , lL: . I 0 1 , ..--,- {l • — 11 - ■1 , . L., , _ L 1 1 ,, _, .., ‘.. ...._ 1 1 , ..; ,....., l ii ,,_. i II , I —,-. i il ■ ii I "I I . , 1 „ II II . .... • ..._..... . _ _ — ............ —. —. 1 I f ..._ _________ il I I i - I , 1 I II II TA, 1. (.L . - , . .. ---1 43 --it -- :- ......." -- -- r'..0 11 ..:-... r , ....,. - - .1.1. I 2 ,- ._..., _ III t--• ■ n ,, ri ..,. r 1 r ■ ., r.......; I \ 1.3 VI --e Il --, --,". .e... \ _ ... .., --_ 4.7, II I , I . • (7-----•.---. • 4, . , _ • - A - • .• . ' ..I.t • I ;) (., , P ii i■ ' ' -- rt _ _ f', JO 36 ' -.-) H;- "F I Il , . ) , ■ . , 1 I ..._. ___1. • _................._._._._.._...... . . ,...,,,.. i , ,. , • , . ( , Co . I ,_ • 1 N. , . • ..s. „ n `,., - ,..,, ,,--.. , — I 1 .. , 11 C I t s' . (.' , . rn - - ‘,..,,, I ci rG ' t e■ r'....-, ....) - . • - il .I .Z1 - L ......;-2 - :- , . , , . , - - - -z- , I r II I (\I , f , r I — , II , _ ... II - II r ' , II I I I - , 1 I ) ' i A -------- T- r II " ' * '. -*--..---- -: , - .--,. II I , II ( ( l it ) \ , 1_ . ....--*--*-'..-‘".. 4, 2 I I __ . '; (--.' i ' Slic ' . 1-1. ,.. ,'■,' . 1 -.2.-, -- -,* La I , . q €3 .......—*-.. ........—.....--- ......e..$21.•■••■■ ' 1 1 1 . ......0•4■••••••••••••••••• 11 ' •• 1 • ........****... 44,...........n........* II ..................,....n.*•••••••:•.••••'' • • , ji 4 ; ‘ 4 ,•4: , ••■•■■••••••••.•••••• I , I ' -• i ••••■•■••. 4•*••.•••••••• • \ ..............." .....■...•••••••••••........"* • . • li , 1 ..,...... ..........0• • ti .. ' ...•'''''''*'. Ii 11 ....„ N. 1 ■ . H . , ------- , ,-- r: r ------- I ti , , I! '/\ i \\ ,--.-, --) ) I ' ti 6 / ..."'"---••••-■■'-''....**- r , _, \ _,. \\_ 17 ..\:____\_\\ I i \ \ I \ \ ' :::',.-, I V ,--, ., „ ' , i ' I . , ., \\ s\" \ ...t I . - ,- --- • { l' \ \ ■ k , 1i \ ' 1 e . .."- \ ■ k.--.1- 11 \ \ \ , , _ . 1 , ( \ , i \ \\\ \ \ Q...._-_ .....,------_ ------. ii , \ ,..21 \ I` t \,.. ""/ ---------. .J...-.....---- . ,-, it' I . , ,.....--•--"' . : ' . . ..,.....,............"'".". .....1......., ' .... ,, ..............."..,..... 4. .' ' . II .-. :2 !' 6. ; t I , ,. < „ , ,L .. ' "' ' . , ' V • II , . , 4 ■ ' ,.■ , 'I % 4Pie . ..................". I . , , ................"' "...'"'" . , I , . , • .., , . i .. ........'"'"''''.... . ..........".." , . ,'.''' , .. . . . . 1 ' ' ..........."'""'.. ................... ........*"..............„....., 1 ............. r , 1 - , , . \ \ i , , • , *4 . t. . 1 4 i 1 t 1 1 I 1 I 1 • a .. i 1 / - Il I . ■ - .C1:1:::1 7, . . , I I . I I I , , , I I . ' . ' 1111 I . I I 1 , I ' . ' , I • I I . . I r I I I 1 , I . e‘ = I I , ' ' , I I . I I I r / . 'LL I I 4 il , < 1 ,, r- t...) . , ----r ,. .. - . i N , ' {Os , , c l I , i I , I 1 1 46 I 1e Z ,,,, " „ - ii I ilk. j...,_ si ,1 0 ' NNW :•" ..,... --‹ I Lf--- FII , , • "I Jo> I I ' • ' I • I i I Z 1 ' e - I l' rl, , ' I , . ■,i 2 :II ZiR' IZ ' I e....-, I I , \ II I e I; , . . „ i , 1 , li ■ I / \ . 4 1 • 1 . . 111 1 11 I 1 , 1 e I .. •••mil ik , I i "IMMI6 11 0 N A I = = f Ci...IEN 3 NO DATE REVISIONS s =.. a..N.t. ,.... ,i41/1e, ..i . ari-iC,MP6ON ,.\\ \ \ "...` 07 pi:1,7114`ric:,7\i 1 , , 0753 ecoi; 1=,.;cia e7 1 e 1 \ AS NCYTE S ALE '\\ 5. SAN5ORNI Ell DESIGNER REMARKS , II ' , I \ 1 I \ II N N .... I ° - , .<9 • „ \ I '11 I) n 0_ t 1 ....e. o r- V 1 :' --- 1 I I - , (L .:,-.' , 11,1 I Ini in l ii 0 'i,.._ _ i ...---=-..—... =---,•-•-•,-. ---...-1.-----1":„ _ ---., L.'1.: I L M \ I II \ 545/95 1 ,,,, \ 1 \ DATE , I A. , 1 \ ' IV t.. ..e , I ‘. \ 7000 Zi.iiif. Ne4roptoin atilt* 12,:ii Portland, Or iogon i)72.2.3 ‘ COW 63; - 02iZa H F=4-44. .20100.4.5 M. JIM 1 7 . 7 441 1: 1 i4.6,,, 1/4.3, N.E. a= I , 7:6 . 6. _ k 'NA • -,,,, 11 • , 11 \ , \ - h, VICA - \4: 4) 1 " \ ,,,, \ • cavil engineenn g • ' mantle engineenag • structurW engoleenng II CHK'D , , il \ 1 \ \ 1 • . , ,.. ,, I. 'L • .. ", . ,... . , . . , . . . • , . . . . ,• i . , • . , ..... _ , .... . , ..•• ,. . r , - , : . .," ' - , , ' ■ ,,,o. / ,- +' . ,,`' .+' ... ' ' ' l ,, ' 't! * . ° ' . , ' ' : ,,.'' • ,, ',.. , , , • - - ' " , ' „ , ' ,... ., ,. , ' - . ., 1. , .„ . ` , ' „ , ' ' .`. ' , ' , „, .„. , , ' "".- ,,,,7, • , „ ',"' A., : ' „ : ' ., ':',..''' ' • 4 °. ' - '1, ' -.'',":!,* L, 4 : y -, ' , ...,...,4 1.. '4t A , _ ' ,'" - ,(. 1. 1.4" ,4 ,,.; t4t,. **1 *tr. kAL.....:$4kifoik40,0",...,:. ..... - 'g.N4 44- ' . t:_!- +,", - =,' - ' 4 , I , rN_L_'...._ 1 .***.".0.4441 ,,, , ,,,, ,,,,Y , :7 tf."A *V * ■ * ‘ ).* * ,*?P.fOg**!***4 4, 1 , 1_ , I,A**Venertit*,** r 4 4 * * 10A7930***„,,te,.. n tr ' •,•' Vt =,., „ ' r." „,A1K74.11 ,„ .., _ _ , , „ . , , *,01/421800104,.4 WA... 7,r1-?,:.64,40,6"4,00,,,,,,,g,traiwaiiiktatim 1 SE 1/4 NE i/4 SECTION 35 T I S RI W W.M. I S I 35AD WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON I r1 -° �'vASh IIVGTE)N t :: - .,‘9 ( x9 ) 0 U , NT ' SCALE I = 100' LD i L OT �' ul.l- �.1(�r>4�u>v l: � ,"t!�5�,� X61 r'„ � I tii I �'1'lON SEE MAP IS 1 35AA 12/ /I, JUN 1. k3 a Nf0 t �T CST �e�pri C Si taw P R. NO 823 rzazo 2 I4 es 85 t'U'riIrva $ ,9 >I T #U P;N 5 1303 1302 1301 1 200 ONLY • Iwra Well ilki,Y 014 .44 Ac. .29 Ac 29 Ac 19//Ac 1 0 ° C r 1 Ices. 00 I g CANCELLED SEE MAP 2601, 17 04,2400,2600,3100, moo, 2503,2504, 2 3OI, 2302, 2303, 2401 - 2 405, Iz82o es 85 s I S I 35AA _ o . ° 1300 8 3 25 Ac , � ` I f---) rm.) P FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY / . � J — � �J 1" 1 J J 1 , j . 0 DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE u }l ✓ 13 , L r` _ • WEST 26624' / 1 PINE STREET o i ■ . 7 (] Q Q L- !O / 1 O 146 Ac ' / 194 16 ' E 0' 90 80 SEE MAP W 1 W / 2CAC 3 6 1 Ac 200 100 130' IA I s I 35 AC o r r- r\ JJJ ; ' o — -0 ci D O o 2 1 1 ° 91 20 J d! 2 A!! m 1 130' n N 266 24' M r` CO /... w 125' to - EAST - 6dJ 400 800 / 10292 901 •5 "— 11 0 3 ` 1 100 _ 34 Ac �\ O r--. o m r G r H °' - z 80 SS Ac /Ac / - I S 4 16 p� 6 5 3' 125' Cc C1- EAST 1848 y30 190 3' 190 3 1 2 ° ° :00 700 � / - -- _— 3400 �� ,0 \ O, _ 64 : tO I400 N81 26 E 6S.6S • 1 D [N _ ?02 710 CH r q 7520 �� _ t o z 244 26' 600 --"r- 0 1 ----- _ ^ 6 3 - m 1101 184 2 6 3. I IU2 N i_ I " ' ^ 3300 3(�O 5 'n- I T e I 600 1 • o N 23 Ac. 1 dig /64„.. " 1 I N E COR LOT 2 - . I4AC � . i , $ c+ r I 1 m 1 i r_ r- z -' I' 1 ^ L ,S8S ° 54E 11 I VJ 2x4.6' 100 N89° 0 ':• 916.785► I 190 3' 190 3 . -1 4- �- C \T►�d \ \ 100 4", J 589 °07'E 23966' n S�.aRUCE °/° _ STREET ° m C R 9 4 7 / T`CT`� 23•��� `C� \ \`C a = � 6P 121 7 / to -1 ° ' m / ' 1801 1900 1a1.s' 2001 141 s' 2101 u6s 2100 9? 99 a' es' 85' w P° 40 0 L J N 89° 2900 28 00 se' E ^ ` 10.24 .4C 234C1 /I 2700 a ° ^ fVl o o m '° 1500 3 "' 2 ; I 1166 `x 1 + N o +. 2 200 * — ___ r —_— ��. m /Da ICJ ,,, , ° - m c N139° 06'w u 39 m ° .i - n NW COR o o _ r a '- o GEORGE RI CHARDSON c 21 + 18 8 . 41 + (C. S. No, 13093) 141 s 14 I s' 1 4 1 s ' o, Z 2 i . r I D LC 55 2000 ,c, /N\ f r - 83 3 °° j' a l r l \ 2 n l 2300 ° so - i, I. W T 4 M 1 / m . _ ° p 3 8 o 5 .r-1 + 6 M a II, o - r- • O r- M n ro -- 13 _ 121 n n ° • p - ° o m 1 �� -+ , y 184' r ' N • 0 o 0 ,t,, n _ n - F p - 1z2 ' I 141 +3' - p (' _ 1 r i2 p X . SEE MAP gz 0 CO ° + 4-- 1------ i —+. - -- -1 IS I 36C13 m THORN S 1419' _ _ I m m �j, 121 7 ' S 3 9 37 141 I 1702 u o 1° �E E _ 6 a.6 I I I O _ o DETAIL U \ {� 170 1706 1701 \ / 1— 60 J L — 72 0 71 0 u cc ; __ . 16 s. �o. 1 M p m �I� o�aO�� T � J ���s � . r -e + 1 25 n 18.48 Ch 36 = 1703 M I 81 M - 7 n I �* N : / \ 0 1 _ I > ( �. I n CC 5 1.10 1 16DI n v �, 5 8 9° 07•E ` 3 a 2.3' v iii 0 5T 9 e8 E 125 ' a - *. 64.17 4756 -02. 43.70 60,09 6 �� 1600 33 9, 37 41119 4i3.7 .so ~2 2501 2504 - �. r/ 1 70 089.4c - " 1 � •21 AGE 6 .24 Ad. �, , I J I 35 A D W _ fi / .B OAc. _ �T " - / ' 2. _ J I p X / (Ca No. !3093 ? a $ 1 g7 m / N A' _ ii .,- "- 16' EA I MENT 10■4/960 m a 'B ✓� GRAHAM ACRES so, / 31 LOTS .31 VACATED N _ 6238 I 47' 45' 70' • � � x �� - - 6 42 68 I _ 61 73 78 - 16636 'Iii GRAH A C R E S' Q r 267.6 42' 3 _>, t ) - y r LOTS 10 - 12 VACATED W \ ,{ "' - ' - x r _ll 4, 78-16636 t - -- - - - - -- v —_— aos4s 32.00 8 58 9° 34'6 h .20 — / --- R VACATED 78'5366 v O r r \ p y SEE MAP 269 4' S I 350A . 1 ' ,( TIGARD \ x IS 135AD :. L. L )‘ 1 ' - NE /4 1 l / SECTION J S R1 W 1. J ►!a „.. ,, ,,,/ , *, iii ,, .,+,;, r • %ri - , ,,, /•%%/ y! /�./ // i/.SS ..ww„,„jiz)% / / Ol/ /l /! / / /L(!/ll/ eel! //•c%�.(/Lff //IlJ7l>i��fo /i /ip. lf/.11 ��Flr7//,,,, WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON /`' ROAD VACATED 457559_ ' " �n�z ;' - '`- I 1 9 4.1 s' i r 190-3' S CALE i° =1001 , 102 35 36 6 CANCELLED TAX LOTS / / I 801, 303, 304 , 3706, 4 225 IAA. _ 1 100., 101, 300, 2301,1300 • I r - - - -. - - - 501,3 W0, Y v. / i 301 , .1 L w SEE MAP a • I O I 0 . M L P 1 ,.._ I s 1 2600 1 1 � x°71 . 1 1 22 _ __ I 40 2 EAST 2 3 , - — _ _ _ _ _ _ — 4 \ e4.16 - , )0 in INITIAL/ ',POINT 3Q5 1!0 1 fV CV TOWN OF AIETZSER 200 3• I - $ ......... .. 3 -.: +: a. +,., .r m. _ ^,. „„ z...y. .., .- _::.:.r ,•, r: xu;': :, ,t. ;:iy; ..:G r -. r n•.kn.'R'.Ia a. .rti,.;,h. , d „w:r7ns5,. ..w:, #, .Hi.zd -a�l`� :.'.ivn -- - — — _ - - _ _ I 4416 � - v t'r //}iii /i//% :42"."/i�J�/////.Y/////// ,.., /.Y/m/1L/iA /S/�D.� ///44 is0WAY/".3i9zahw,m9// osa ll0/, 11Y ?46�`� /JFY,s0.50 //11.f////1y/// ' 1, 1' , j� / / .r /f /fimY /// , ' .!X.vr.YlYr ' . /. U • :' N 0 0 V � V � i E4 /HI YGATED .... N e s _ 4.00 , 302 S 50' t9 5 I 5 I SB W a0' 1 a l 60 2 95 7 60' I 50 130 I s�3 � , , n y„ 05AC. / /.CC R. rv4 5 w r ,a. *•dry k , w 1 80 I 0 803 1 1 50 0 n _; ... / k , � ” j A. 0 I m I OI O I I O ∎J / 4�"� l31.1� �t., fi 9s:,. �vr ro -• c, L S J 154 30 8607 5 6 190 3' . O I O 10 1 I � K �, T3t3 :N�r .. N;.. i .�.;:s, � �'i,'.r _ I I I - I - M 1 1 -/ o - ., may - i I 1 I d I 1 2 �l s s� lso'w m / S92 / � � S CU t STREET 0 90 , -r 0 i : I � N 2 $04 1 f' 100 II 7.4 "''e 1 9 4. I s F ` � a 6 , _ r .7,,...,2* e1•1o596 1601 15911 A la a o' 1 m I { I I 6c o 500 eo 1400 5 �I - - - HI _ _ 150 1 121 ,30 (t) .82Ac t . 78/r 1500 $ . ° 902 2 us oj- )0 805 y o .0 / ; 6 (C S No J0836) { I I _ 1 M I _ 6 _ _ _ 1 1 1 115 - e I *; _ in - -- y „ i 'n / n 1 m 1 i o 4\ n , i; 1 6001 r- ” v) I I I 1 I I L I 110 I r,._ t 806 I r ° ti� - o _ I.11 cs, w 901 I i I I r r- 0 I a! 800 I I 0` --) n � I602 o ti I 1 o I U 1 I 102 p2 `�4 .� . � ` Q e 1 �� > I Y I 2 1903 y 7 ao ao' J9 50 _110 50'_ j L 50 L8 so ' a so ' _! / : ' U W p 1900 1901 � -- � 1800 I 01 � o , 193 4 i `` ■ . n °r! , 0 4 590 n (000 r 59� / v r / '� el 5 0' S 0' a o' 1 S 0' -1 I a o -1 6 0 T 9 3.3 , 0 89 �' 1001 1 -r 1 I I �. " � f, I702 f1700 • �' t` 1 r ► r 1 7 I r 1 r P �, / N t � c S IoIo7 A _ R _ �. ........, O I �O ` / n ` t �/ (I �S 10578 I °{ I= ° 4": J /j r F 10021 I I I I I 1 , � . �,- 17a+o 4 - J- — 2 — ! I i 3 1 2 11 ::: 140 4o I 6 / � 5 -I --- 1 I 4 la 190 3' 19C � l_ 1 � 100' I0D' 0 I �b0' I {87b' / 36T 15' .- - - --. — -- — --- mow,_ SEE MAP I T ____: —.. g 12 al ' 00 r c ATEr Aso re -1e 1 ��� �. STREET m 1S1 35AB ( ,' 1101 1 I' 1 1 - -- — — — —_ �' 1 o L397 -- - 194 Is' 1903 f90 '"�'° �I 1'°g 4n 1 I49 ;c- SEE MAP ' 2000 210 0 2 2 00 1 6 i 1 I 0 I / 22 �_ _ k - - - 0 1 - -- I 2TA[ 1 1S 1 35A A . " � SUPPLEMENTAL Via' ,1 ` izjT(: 10 1100 �I 1200 �1 NO.1 - I ;'- ° I I- o 12 5 r CS 10138 m - r, 1 2201 5 0' -8 1 o o— 9 53 8 14 2 7' 17 ao' 1 . _J ' '. � .. / ■ . / / //i ii555if t)i)fnr,#;*. • / . 4 . , i elf fff�{f� r lT / / / /.l V �] i m 7 137 91 1290 i A 4200 / / 39 3800 3707 r - 1 50 -" ' \ I 4o Qno <2 9 I t2s / e9 EO I r 3 705 f 2 5 0 0 'T' 2400 2 3 0 0 95 2303 $ 1 N(C S- No. 12 8931 � ; �, �- _ or 3902 im 188.97 �' N 0 3 �2 0 8 - / 129 0a oe _ 3700 k.- - - iD _ 2305 z x - l z 27' o, �' k / 0 3703 370 1 3704 m ;1 ti 79 9530 �� I o / 5�r o I I ° 12 2 7 c r r" 2 30 4 I 2302 n / X Nag °40'W •Y - A .. TS r 0 S A11.= J Z 71 6 9' 7 I a v' o o ,o ,,,1 7 ,ti " 3901 - Y °° 1 $ � k o �� �30 I IS l 3t • / 9 ,° 7' 12 !01 ) 0 , I J ''s, 6 1 0 9 le' go `9N 5 1 9 0 3' 6 79 95 3 r ti /''' „,t• w 3702 J r — - - - 6:• 3 5 4 � 1 p )/ //Too A "�I � ' m � C� I OAK STR - t -- J - r � J N I J f� - I ,0. , r -+ � I � r� I I \ r EAST / N89 ° 40'E 246 2' 13791' 74635' 74635' 34 130' 2600 2700 J /" r J\ /j I I . 19 6 ' 190 3' , L 82 -27892 _ c48 2 1 90' 280 - (_ 2900 151 3000 n 0 0 0 1 -L - 01R 8 23 d o f .r 1 v+-- r: U) - j o 0 0 " 10 • m 190 15' 90' SEE MAP 15 1 3 61 2 �; m F l 2800 _ , E 1 Z---7- ti I + . :... 3 WASHINGTON COUNTY 4400 0 4500 DEPARTMENT OF p .1 ‘V Ac. r .17 Ac. SEE MAP AS;,ESSMv_iN!' TAXATION 3 IS 1 35AC ( 1 - ., — 5 * 2 Ig 3 52 h t 403o loo o0 2_ r,flU t; 36.10- 9a la { ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY , 3300 , 8 300 QO ,N.) FOR FOR F <'aSES51rE�� "i Pi;RE�USE I 30 406 g 99\ t.l DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE o'I Y - DO NOT RELY OM - 'FO:? rZTFP_H ijSU _ u e a' ' o 34x00 3201 3200 • }, • SEE MAP 6 , ai4. s' , d 96 -I''_ :.10' IS -- .1.1,.. . .. —J : c ed 1 IS 135AD : f TIGARD PINE = - ST a E T x i s 1 35 AA ,