Loading...
CUP1996-00006 : CITY OF TIGARD • CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER q BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006NARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 Case Name(s): WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Name of Owner: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum Name of Applicant: Western PCS Corporation Address of Applicant: 7535 B NE Ambassador Place City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97220 Address of Property: 11744 SW Pacific Highway City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).:WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100 Request: >The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to allow the use of a gravel surface as an access driveway to this facility. Zone: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. Action: > 0 Approval as requested © Approval with Conditions of the Conditional Use Permit © Denial of the Request for a Variance Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:9 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 96- 0006NAR 96-0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Western PCS Corporation for a ) FINAL ORDER conditional Use Permit to develop a 130 foot cellular ) CUP 96 -0006 communications monopole and a variance from paving ) VAR 96 -0010 requirements for the access. ) (Western PCS) I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to develop a cellular communications monopole to improve cellular phone service along the Highway 217 and Highway 99 corridors and a variance to allow use of a gravel surface as an access driveway to this facility. Hearings Officer Deniece Won held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on August 26, 1996. City staff recommended conditional approval of the permit. The applicant accepted the staff report, recommendation and conditions. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 36CC, Tax Lots 2000 and 2100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION: C -G (General Commercial) APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.134 and 18.164. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approve Page 1 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • II. HEARING A. Hearing Hearings Officer Deniece Won received testimony at the public hearing about this application on August 26, 1996. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), and Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. B. Summary of Oral Testimony. 1. City Planner Mark Roberts testified for the City. He summarized the staff report and recommendation. City staff recommended approval of the permit with conditions. 2. Hearings Officer Won said she had some doubt about whether the variance request conforms to the Code's variance criteria. She said her concern was particularly with the second criteria requiring that there be special circumstances peculiar to the site rather than peculiar to the use, and with the fifth criteria which requires that the hardship not be self imposed and that the variance be the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the hardship. 3. City Planner Mark Roberts stated that concerning criteria two, much of the reason for the location of the leasehold area is to maximize the redevelopment potential of the site. The variance is also justified because this type of use only requires a monthly service call. He said the staff considers this as one -way access. The Code does not specify a minimum width. He thinks that fifteen (15) feet is acceptable. 4. Mike Berndorf testified for the applicant. He said that the applicant accepts the conditions of approval. He stated that this site was chosen to cover a service gap in Western PCS's cellular system along Highway 217, along Highway 99 and in the downtown area of Tigard. He said the variance is requested because the cellular tower facilities are accessed infrequently. He said that the facility is unmanned and typically there is a only monthly service inspection with a service vehicle, such as a small pickup truck. He said that part of the reason the applicant chose to locate the facility on this particular part of the property is because it is an under - utilized portion of the property. The leasehold area is a triangular area in the corner of the property that would not likely be useful for some future commercial use. Locating the communications tower at that corner allows maximum use of the property for future development. He said this property is a good location for their cellular communication lines because of the site's line of sight to Highway 217 and its off - ramps. He stated that the applicant is asking for the minimum vehicular access that will meet Fire District requirements. He said that the applicant will comply with the requirement of Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to pave the first 20 feet of the access road. Page 2 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • III. FINDINGS The Hearings Officer adopts and incorporates in this order the Tigard Community Development Staff report dated August 19, 1996 (the "Staff Report ") including the summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable approval standards, agency comments and evaluation of the request, except to the extent expressly modified herein. IV. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development code and Comprehensive Plan. 1. Community Development code Section 18.134.050 allows the Hearings Officer to approve, or approve with conditions, a request for a variance based on the following findings: 1) The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; 2) There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 3) The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; 4) Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; and 5) The hardship is not self- imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. a. Before 1992, LUBA and the Oregon Courts strictly construed city and county traditional variance criteria, such as contained in the Tigard Community Development Code. After 1992, LUBA and the Courts have backed away from strict interpretation and deferred to local governments' interpretation of ambiguous code terms unless the term is not ambiguous or that interpretation is clearly wrong. The petitioner has the burden to prove that his request complies with the criteria. Main Auto Body v. City of Salem, Or LUBA 95 -076. Page 3 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • The Tigard Development Code contains five criteria applicable to a variance request. Each of the five criterion contains more than one factor. b. Criteria 1 requires that the proposed variance will not be: a) materially detrimental to the purposes of the Code, and b) in conflict with: 1) the policies of the comprehensive plan, 2) any other applicable polices and standards, and 3) to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. 1) The applicant's submittal argued that public safety and welfare will not be jeopardized by approving the variance. I find that this is an overly broad statement of the Code's requirement that approval of the variance request will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Code. The applicant's submittal does not address the criterion's requirement that the variance will not be in conflict with other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. 2) The City staff report found that the proposed driveway pavement variance is not materially detrimental to the purposes of the Code nor in conflict with polices of the Comprehensive Plan because if its limited nature. I accept these findings. 3) The City staff found that developing this use closer to the street would limit future development of the property. The staff seems to conclude that the purposes of the comprehensive plan and Development Code are more fully fulfilled by approving the use at the proposed location, with the variance, than would occur if the use were located closer to the public street, thereby reducing the access length that needs to be paved under the Code's requirements. While this may be true, the variance criteria does not set forth a balancing of benefits test, but rather requires that granting the variance not be materially detrimental to the Code's purposes. I find this staff finding of fact to be irrelevant to deciding whether to approve the requested variance. 4) I find that there was no evidence submitted that the variance is in conflict with other properties in the same zoning district. I conclude that the variance request complies with the first criterion. c. Criteria 2 requires that there are special circumstances that exist, a) which are peculiar to the 1) lot size or shape, 2) topography, or 3) other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and b) which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. 1) Under the Tigard Community Development Code, the "special circumstances" that exist must be peculiar to the lot or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control. The "lot size and shape, or topography" standards relate to the site and not to the owner or the proposed use of the land involved with the requested variance. Because the "other circumstances" requirement is limited to circumstances over which the applicant has no control, this criterion requires that the special circumstances relate to land, not to the owner or the proposed use. This standard requires proof that the "special circumstances that exist" arise from conditions inherent in the land which distinguish it from Page 4 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • other land in the same zone. A more liberal interpretation is allowed only if there is some authority in the City's ordinances to support a more liberal interpretation. Sokol v. City of Lake Oswego, 17 OR LUBA 429, 438 -440 (1989). Even with change in the LUBA and Court interpretation, this reading seems applicable to this criterion of the Tigard Code. This criterion requires that to be eligible for a variance, the circumstances favoring approval of the request must be unique to the parcel and not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. 2) The applicant's submittal states that the proposed use is not a typical commercial use that creates a need for a paved access road because the facility is unmanned and there will be no traffic to the site except monthly service inspections conducted by one person utilizing a small service vehicle. In testimony the applicant's representative stated that this triangular corner of the property would not likely be useful for future commercial redevelopment of the site and that locating the communications tower in this corner would maximize redevelopment of the property in the future. I conclude that the applicant's arguments in favor of the variance relate to the applicant's proposed use not special circumstances related to the land, and relate to maximization of redevelopment of the property which is not a criterion of the Code. Thus, the first criterion is not met. 3) The City staff found that the site meets the third factor of the first prong of the criterion concerning whether there are "other circumstances applicable to the lot over which the applicant has no control" because much of the property width along the lot's public street frontage is developed with the veterinary clinic use. While this may be true, it is not determinative of compliance with the second criteria because the special circumstances that exist must also not apply to other properties in the same zoning district. 4) The second criterion's factor requiring that the special circumstances applicable to the land should not be applicable to other lands in the zoning district requires the applicant to show that the special circumstances affecting the applicant's property do not apply to other property in the zoning district. The fact that the City has a history of granting variances is not relevant to a determination of whether extraordinary circumstances exist. Lovell v. Independence Planning Comm., 37 Or App 3, 6, 586 P2d 99 (1978). The staff report states that much of the public street frontage of this site is developed with the veterinary clinic. Thus, the redevelopable part of the site is some distance back from the street. There is no evidence that this circumstance does not apply to other property in the general commercial district. In this request, the need for the variance from the Code's requirement to pave accesses does not arise from special circumstances of this lot that do not exist on other properties in the zone, but rather from the applicant's desire to locate the proposed use on a particular portion of this lot. I conclude that the applicant has not proved that criterion two is complied with. d. Criterion 3 requires that a) The use proposed will be the same as permitted under the Code, and b) City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land. Page 5 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • . 1) The first prong of this criteria repeats the statement in the intent section of the variance code that provides that variances can not be granted to the permitted uses within the zoning code. Here, the proposed utility use is allowable in the general commercial zone. The approval of the requested variance will not alter the use of the land. The variance request compiles with the first prong of the criterion. • 2) The second prong of this criteria has two factors. First, City Code standards should be maintained to the greatest extent reasonably possible. Second, the land should be permitted some economic use. i) All City Code criteria are met with this proposal except the requirement that access shall be paved. The pavement requirement should be met to the greatest extent reasonably possible. The applicant will comply with ODOT's requirement to pave the first 20 feet of the access. The requested variance from the standard, to gravel rather than pave the remainder of the access, appears to be the least deviation from the Code's pavement standard. ii) The City Code does not define what should be included within the meaning of "land" which needs to be permitted "some economic use." The code does define the term "lot" as "a unit of land that is created by a subdivision or partition of land and is owned by or under the lawful control and in the lawful possession of one ownership." Assuming that the two parcels under consideration here where lawfully created, the Code treats them as a single lot because they are under one ownership. Whole lots are subject to the zoning regulations, not leased subareas of lots. It appears that for purposes of the variance provisions, the term "land" is used to mean the same thing as "lot." Thus, the economic use consideration applies to the whole lot, not to the sub -part of the lot the applicant plans to lease from the owner and which is subject to this conditional use permit review. iii) The meaning of "some economic use" is not defined in the Tigard Development Code. The context of the term implies that the intent is to allow a variance where strict application of the City's regulations would result in a "taking" of private property. Under Federal Court cases dealing with regulatory takings, regulations must not render the property without any economic use and any exactions required by the regulation must be roughly proportional to the impact generated by the proposed use. Dolan v. City of Tigard, 129 L.Ed.2d 304 (1994). The lot currently is used as a veterinary clinic. Denial of the variance request to relieve the lessee from the Code's requirement to pave the access to the proposed communication tower facility on a small corner of the lot does not prohibit the property owner from enjoying some economic use of his land. Thus, approval of less than full City Code standards is not necessitated by the reason that the property owner would loose his property rights if the variance were not granted. Even if the property owner could use the land more profitably if the variance were granted, that would not be a sufficient basis for establishing a practical difficulty. Lovell v. Independence Planning Comm., 37 Or App 3, • 7, 586 P2d 99 (1978). The pavement regulation is not an exaction of private property for public use and does not impose a condition on the use of the property in an individualized, Page 6 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • descretionary land use decision. Rather, the paving requirement was a legislative policy choice of the City Council enacted in the City Code and applicable to all accesses. Therefore the rough proportionality standard does not apply here. d) Criterion four requires that existing physical and natural systems will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code. Examples of physical and natural systems listed in the criterion are traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, and parks. 1) The City staff finds that the nature of the variance is limited in nature such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by this change. There was no evidence submitted that existing physical and natural systems will be adversely affected by granting the variance. I accept this staff finding on criterion four. 2) The staff further finds that granting the variance will allow additional use of the partially developed commercial site and also finds that the Oregon Department of Transportation did not comment on graveling the access. While these findings may be true, I conclude that they are not findings relevant to whether physical and natural systems will be not be more adversely affected than if the variance where not approved. 3) I conclude that criterion four is complied with. e) Criterion 5 requires that a) the hardship is not self- imposed, and b) the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. 1) The first prong of this standard allows a variance to be granted only when the hardship is not of the applicant's own making. The applicant stated in his submittal that: "[T]he cost of paving the access road will create an economic hardship to the applicant. Approximately 2250 square feet would have to be paved to accommodate a fifteen foot wide access road serving the site. This would generate between $13,000 - $16,000 in additional costs to the applicant (estimated cost of laying asphalt $6 -$7 per square foot (3 inch layer)" "Using a gravel surface produces fewer negative site development impacts, compared to paving. Paved surfaces prevent water from percolating into the ground, thereby increasing storm -water run -off. Water catch basins have to be constructed to accommodate this run -off. Paving also requires that a larger area [be] disturbed for construction of the underlying base. Further disturbance results from the need to bring in heavy paving equipment. In summary, allowing a gravel access road produces fewer negative site development impacts, compared to paving." Page 7 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • 2) In this request, the "hardship" the applicant seeks relief from is the relatively high cost of paving the access as required by the Code compared to the relatively low number of vehicle trips that will be generated by the proposed communication tower use of site. The staff finds that the hardship is not self imposed because the site is partially developed, its size and shape, and the limited need for access to the proposed communications tower dictate the proposed location of the use. 3) I find that the applicant has chosen to lease a particular portion of a particular lot for the proposed cellular communications tower. The length of the access and thus, the amount and extent of pavement required is the result of that decision. The hardship the applicant seeks relief from was under his control when he selected the site for the proposed use. In a situation, reviewed by LUBA, where the topographic conditions made it difficult, but not impossible, to comply with required setbacks, a variance was not permissible simply to allow a tower to be built on the part of the property where the applicant felt its operation would be optimized. Hams v. Polk Count, 23 Or LUBA 152, 157 (1992). 4) The prong of the criterion concerning whether the "variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship," requires consideration of whether there are alternatives that would eliminate the need for the variance. The record contains little evidence that other alternatives were considered. The testimony was that the pavement width was proposed to be 15 feet. Because a car needs approximately this much width there is little latitude to adjust the cost of complying with the standard by reducing the amount of pavement if the distance of the access is constant. The distance of the access could be shortened by altering the location of the use on the lot or by locating the use on some other lot. The variance requested, gravel rather than pavement, appears to be the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship given the chosen site location for the proposed use. The City staff found that a fifteen foot gravel, rather than paved, access allows emergency vehicle and monthly maintenance vehicle access to the facility and is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the hardship. I accept the staff's findings. 5) Criterion five is written in the conjunctive, both prongs of the standard need to be met before a variance can be approved. Because the hardship is the result of decisions that were under the control of the applicant and not inherent to the characteristics of the lot, this criteria is not met. The applicant has the burden to prove that the variance request complies with the Code's standards. I conclude that the applicant has not met his burden to prove that the criterion has been met. VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site and surrounding area. Page 8 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit will comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws subject to the conditions of approval recommended in the August 19, 1996 Staff Report warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby approves CUP 96 -0006 subject to the conditions in the Staff Report and denies VAR 96 -0010. DATED this 5th day of September, 1996 it Deniece B. Won, Hearings Officer Page 9 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • £xIIJ :,r,T A A . • nt .11L CITY OF TIGARD • CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER Ct. BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 - 0006NARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 Case Name(s): WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Name of Owner: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum Name of Applicant: Western PCS Corporation Address of Applicant: 7535 B NE Ambassador Place City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97220 Address of Property: 11744 SW Pacific Highway City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).:WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100 Request: >The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to allow the use of a gravel surface as an access driveway to this facility. Zone: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. Action: > 0 Approval as requested © Approval with Conditions of the Conditional Use Permit © Denial of the Request for a Variance Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:9> THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON SEPTEMBER 25, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 96- 0006NAR 96-0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Western PCS Corporation for a ) FINAL ORDER conditional Use Permit to develop a 130 foot cellular ) CUP 96 -0006 communications monopole and a variance from paving ) VAR 96 -0010 requirements for the access. ) (Western PCS) I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to develop a cellular communications monopole to improve cellular phone service along the Highway 217 and Highway 99 corridors and a variance to allow use of a gravel surface as an access driveway to this facility. Hearings Officer Deniece Won held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on August 26, 1996. City staff recommended conditional approval of the permit. The applicant accepted the staff report, recommendation and conditions. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway; WCTM 2S1 36CC, Tax Lots 2000 and 2100 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION: C -G (General Commercial) APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, 18.134 and 18.164. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approve Page 1 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • II. HEARING A. Hearing Hearings Officer Deniece Won received testimony at the public hearing about this • application on August 26, 1996. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), and Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. • B. Summary of Oral Testimony. 1. City Planner Mark Roberts testified for the City. He summarized the staff report and recommendation. City staff recommended approval of the permit with conditions. 2. Hearings Officer Won said she had some doubt about whether the variance request conforms to the Code's variance criteria. She said her concern was particularly with the second criteria requiring that there be special circumstances peculiar to the site rather than peculiar to the use, and with the fifth criteria which requires that the hardship not be self imposed and that the variance be the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the hardship. 3. City Planner Mark Roberts stated that concerning criteria two, much of the reason for the location of the leasehold area is to maximize the redevelopment potential of the site. The variance is also justified because this type of use only requires a monthly service call. He said the staff considers this as one -way access. The Code does not specify a minimum width. He thinks that fifteen (15) feet is acceptable. 4. Mike Berndorf testified for the applicant. He said that the applicant accepts the conditions of approval. He stated that this site was chosen to cover a service gap in Western PCS's cellular system along Highway 217, along Highway 99 and in the downtown area of Tigard. He said the variance is requested because the cellular tower facilities are accessed infrequently. He said that the facility is unmanned and typically there is a only monthly service inspection with a service vehicle, such as a small pickup truck. He said that part of the reason the applicant chose to locate the facility on this particular part of the property is because it is an under - utilized portion of the property. The leasehold area is a triangular area in the corner of the property that would not likely be useful for some future commercial use. Locating the communications tower at that corner allows maximum use of the property for future development. He said this property is a good location for their cellular communication lines because of the site's line of sight to Highway 217 and its off - ramps. He stated that the applicant is asking for the minimum vehicular access that will meet Fire District requirements. He said that the applicant will comply with the requirement of Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to pave the first 20 feet of the access road. Page 2 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • III. FINDINGS The Hearings Officer adopts and incorporates in this order the Tigard Community Development Staff report dated August 19, 1996 (the "Staff Report ") including the summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable approval standards, agency comments and evaluation of the request, except to the extent expressly modified herein. IV. EVALUATION OF REQUEST A. Compliance with Community Development code and Comprehensive Plan. 1. Community Development code Section 18.134.050 allows the Hearings Officer to approve, or approve with conditions, a request for a variance based on the following findings: 1) The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the comprehensive plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; 2) There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; 3) The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; 4) Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the title; and 5) The hardship is not self- imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. a. Before 1992, LUBA and the Oregon Courts strictly construed city and county traditional variance criteria, such as contained in the Tigard Community Development Code. After 1992, LUBA and the Courts have backed away from strict interpretation and deferred to local governments' interpretation of ambiguous code terms unless the term is not ambiguous or that interpretation is clearly wrong. The petitioner has the burden to prove that his request complies with the criteria. Main Auto Body v. City of Salem, Or LUBA 95 -076. Page 3 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • The Tigard Development Code contains five criteria applicable to a variance request. Each . of the five criterion contains more than one factor. b. Criteria 1 requires that the proposed variance will not be: a) materially detrimental to the purposes of the Code, and b) in conflict with: 1) the policies of the comprehensive plan, 2) any other applicable polices and standards, and 3) to other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. 1) The applicant's submittal argued that public safety and welfare will not be jeopardized by approving the variance. I find that this is an overly broad statement of the Code's requirement that approval of the variance request will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the Code. The applicant's submittal does not address the criterion's requirement that the variance will not be in conflict with other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity. 2) The City staff report found that the proposed driveway pavement variance is not materially detrimental to the purposes of the Code nor in conflict with polices of the Comprehensive Plan because if its limited nature. I accept these findings. 3) The City staff found that developing this use closer to the street would limit future development of the property. The staff seems to conclude that the purposes of the comprehensive plan and Development Code are more fully fulfilled by approving the use at the proposed location, with the variance, than would occur if the use were located closer to the public street, thereby reducing the access length that needs to be paved under the Code's requirements. While this may be true, the variance criteria does not set forth a balancing of benefits test, but rather requires that granting the variance not be materially detrimental to the Code's purposes. I find this staff finding of fact to be irrelevant to deciding whether to approve the requested variance. 4) I find that there was no evidence submitted that the variance is in conflict with other properties in the same zoning district. I conclude that the variance request complies with the first criterion. c. Criteria 2 requires that there are special circumstances that exist, a) which are peculiar to the 1) lot size or shape, 2) topography, or 3) other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and b) which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. 1) Under the Tigard Community Development Code, the "special circumstances" that exist must be peculiar to the lot or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control. The "lot size and shape, or topography" standards relate to the site and not to the owner or the proposed use of the land involved with the requested variance. Because the "other circumstances" requirement is limited to circumstances over which the applicant has no control, this criterion requires that the special circumstances relate to land, not to the owner or the proposed use. This standard requires proof that the "special circumstances that exist" arise from conditions inherent in the land which distinguish it from Page 4 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • other land in the same zone. A more liberal interpretation is allowed only if there is some . authority in the City's ordinances to support a more liberal interpretation. Sokol v. City of Lake Oswego, 17 OR LUBA 429, 438 -440 (1989). Even with change in the LUBA and Court interpretation, this reading seems applicable to this criterion of the Tigard Code. This criterion requires that to be eligible for a variance, the circumstances favoring approval of the request must be unique to the parcel and not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district. 2) The applicant's submittal states that the proposed use is not a typical commercial use that creates a need for a paved access road because the facility is unmanned and there will be no traffic to the site except monthly service inspections conducted by one person utilizing a small service vehicle. In testimony the applicant's representative stated that this triangular corner of the property would not likely be useful for future commercial redevelopment of the site and that locating the communications tower in this corner would maximize redevelopment of the property in the future. I conclude that the applicant's arguments in favor of the variance relate to the applicant's proposed use not special circumstances related to the land, and relate to maximization of redevelopment of the property which is not a criterion of the Code. Thus, the first criterion is not met. 3) The City staff found that the site meets the third factor of the first prong of the criterion concerning whether there are "other circumstances applicable to the lot over which the applicant has no control" because much of the property width along the lot's public street frontage is developed with the veterinary clinic use. While this may be true, it is not determinative of compliance with the second criteria because the special circumstances that exist must also not apply to other properties in the same zoning district. 4) The second criterion's factor requiring that the special circumstances applicable to the land should not be applicable to other lands in the zoning district requires the applicant to show that the special circumstances affecting the applicant's property do not apply to other property in the zoning district. The fact that the City has a history of granting variances is not relevant to a determination of whether extraordinary circumstances exist. Lovell v. Independence Planning Comm., 37 Or App 3, 6, 586 P2d 99 (1978). The staff report states that much of the public street frontage of this site is developed with the veterinary clinic. Thus, the redevelopable part of the site is some distance back from the street. There is no evidence that this circumstance does not apply to other property in the general commercial district. In this request, the need for the variance from the Code's requirement to pave accesses does not arise from special circumstances of this lot that do not exist on other properties in the zone, but rather from the applicant's desire to locate the proposed use on a particular portion of this lot. I conclude that the applicant has not proved that criterion two is complied with. d. Criterion 3 requires that a) The use proposed will be the same as permitted under the Code, and b) City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land. Page 5 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) S • 1) The first prong of this criteria repeats the statement in the intent section of the variance code that provides that variances can not be granted to the permitted • uses within the zoning code. Here, the proposed utility use is allowable in the general commercial zone. The approval of the requested variance will not alter the use of the land. The variance request compiles with the first prong of the criterion. 2) The second prong of this criteria has two factors. First, City Code standards should be maintained to the greatest extent reasonably possible. Second, the land should be permitted some economic use. i) All City Code criteria are met with this proposal except the requirement that access shall be paved. The pavement requirement should be met to the greatest extent reasonably possible. The applicant will comply with ODOT's requirement to pave the first 20 feet of the access. The requested variance from the standard, to gravel rather than pave the remainder of the access, appears to be the least deviation from the Code's pavement standard. ii) The City Code does not define what should be included within the meaning of "land" which needs to be permitted "some economic use." The code does define the term "lot" as "a unit of land that is created by a subdivision or partition of land and is owned by or under the lawful control and in the lawful possession of one ownership." Assuming that the two parcels under consideration here where lawfully created, the Code treats them as a single lot because they are under one ownership. Whole lots are subject to the zoning regulations, not leased subareas of lots. It appears that for purposes of the variance provisions, the term "land" is used to mean the same thing as "lot." Thus, the economic use consideration applies to the whole lot, not to the sub -part of the lot the applicant plans to lease from the owner and which is subject to this conditional use permit review. iii) The meaning of "some economic use" is not defined in the Tigard Development Code. The context of the term implies that the intent is to allow a variance where strict application of the City's regulations would result in a "taking" of private property. Under Federal Court cases dealing with regulatory takings, regulations must not render the property without any economic use and any exactions required by the regulation must be roughly proportional to the impact generated by the proposed use. Dolan v. City of Tigard, 129 L.Ed.2d 304 (1994). The lot currently is used as a veterinary clinic. Denial of the variance request to relieve the lessee from the Code's requirement to pave the access to the proposed communication tower facility on a small corner of the lot does not prohibit the property owner from enjoying some economic use of his land. Thus, approval of less than full City Code standards is not necessitated by the reason that the property owner would loose his property rights if the variance were not granted. Even if the property owner could use the land more profitably if the variance were granted, that would not be a sufficient basis for establishing a practical difficulty. Lovell v. Independence Planning Comm., 37 Or App 3, • 7, 586 P2d 99 (1978). The pavement regulation is not an exaction of private property for public use and does not impose a condition on the use of the property in an individualized, Page 6 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • descretionary land use decision. Rather, the paving requirement was a legislative policy . choice of the City Council enacted in the City Code and applicable to all accesses. Therefore the rough proportionality standard does not apply here. d) Criterion four requires that existing physical and natural systems will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified in the Code. Examples of physical and natural systems listed in the criterion are traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms, and parks. 1) The City staff finds that the nature of the variance is limited in nature such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by this change. There was no evidence submitted that existing physical and natural systems will be adversely affected by granting the variance. I accept this staff finding on criterion four. 2) The staff further finds that granting the variance will allow additional use of the partially developed commercial site and also finds that the Oregon Department of Transportation did not comment on graveling the access. While these findings may be true, I conclude that they are not findings relevant to whether physical and natural systems will be not be more adversely affected than if the variance where not approved. 3) I conclude that criterion four is complied with. e) Criterion 5 requires that a) the hardship is not self- imposed, and b) the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. 1) The first prong of this standard allows a variance to be granted only when the hardship is not of the applicant's own making. The applicant stated in his submittal that: "[T]he cost of paving the access road will create an economic hardship to the applicant. Approximately 2250 square feet would have to be paved to accommodate a fifteen foot wide access road serving the site. This would generate between $13,000- $16,000 in additional costs to the applicant (estimated cost of laying asphalt $6 -$7 per square foot (3 inch layer)" "Using a gravel surface produces fewer negative site development impacts, compared to paving. Paved surfaces prevent water from percolating into the ground, thereby increasing storm -water run -off. Water catch basins have to be constructed to accommodate this run -off. Paving also requires that a larger area [be] disturbed for construction of the underlying base. Further disturbance results from the need to bring in heavy paving equipment. In summary, allowing a gravel access road produces fewer negative site development impacts, compared to paving." Page 7 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • 2) In this request, the "hardship" the applicant seeks relief from is the . relatively high cost of paving the access as required by the Code compared to the relatively • low number of vehicle trips that will be generated by the proposed communication tower use of site. The staff finds that the hardship is not self imposed because the site is partially developed, its size and shape, and the limited need for access to the proposed communications tower dictate the proposed location of the use. 3) I find that the applicant has chosen to lease a particular portion of a particular lot for the proposed cellular communications tower. The length of the access and thus, the amount and extent of pavement required is the result of that decision. The hardship the applicant seeks relief from was under his control when he selected the site for the proposed use. In a situation, reviewed by LUBA, where the topographic conditions made it difficult, but not impossible, to comply with required setbacks, a variance was not permissible simply to allow a tower to be built on the part of the property where the applicant felt its operation would be optimized. Hams v. Polk Count, 23 Or LUBA 152, 157 (1992). 4). The prong of the criterion concerning whether the "variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship," requires consideration of whether there are alternatives that would eliminate the need for the variance. The record contains little evidence that other alternatives were considered. The testimony was that the pavement width was proposed to be 15 feet. Because a car needs approximately this much width there is little latitude to adjust the cost of complying with the standard by reducing the amount of pavement if the distance of the access is constant. The distance of the access could be shortened by altering the location of the use on the lot or by locating the use on some other lot. The variance requested, gravel rather than pavement, appears to be the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship given the chosen site location for the proposed use. The City staff found that a fifteen foot gravel, rather than paved, access allows emergency vehicle and monthly maintenance vehicle access to the facility and is the minimum variance necessary to alleviate the hardship. I accept the staffs findings. 5) Criterion five is written in the conjunctive, both prongs of the standard need to be met before a variance can be approved. Because the hardship is the result of decisions that were under the control of the applicant and not inherent to the characteristics of the lot, this criteria is not met. The applicant has the burden to prove that the variance request complies with the Code's standards. I conclude that the applicant has not met his burden to prove that the criterion has been met. VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site and surrounding area. Page 8 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • • VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit will comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws subject to the conditions of approval recommended in the August 19, 1996 Staff Report warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby approves CUP 96 -0006 subject to the conditions in the Staff Report and denies VAR 96 -0010. DATED this 5th day of September, 1996 it Z 0r'U Deniece B. Won, Hearings Officer Page 9 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0006 and VAR 96 -0010 (Western PCS Monopole) • Agenda Item:111.1 Hearing Date: August 26. 1996 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE....::....: CITY OF TIGARD EARING FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0006 Variance VAR 96 -0010 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested: 1. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. 2. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to allow the use of a gravel surface as an access driveway to this facility. APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum 7535 B NE Ambassador Place 21390 SW Edy Road Portland, OR 97220 Sherwood, OR 97140 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lots 2000 and 2100. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find : that the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Variance will not'adversely affect the health; safety and welfare of the City.: Therefore, staff, recommends: APPROVAL, subject to the_ following :recommended of :approval: <.; >.::;:;> I . . STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 1 ttNDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, • THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise: noted; :the staff contact shall be Mark Roberts : : . Plannin Division 503 639 -4171: 1. The applicant shall provide lighting on the proposed tower with a dual fitted red obstruction light mounted on top of the structure in accordance with Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 70/7460, Chapters 4, 5 and 13. STAFF CONTACT: Thomas Highland, Aviation Planner, Oregon Department of Transportation. 2. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, for the new driveway to be constructed to the frontage road that provides access to SW Pacific Highway. The applicant shall construct a minimum of a 20 -foot paved driveway from the edge of the existing frontage road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Doherty, Oregon Department of Transportation. 3. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface to be constructed within the leasehold area. 4. The applicant shall review the option of realigning the proposed gravel driveway and the fencing with the arborist in order to preserve the three trees that have been found to be healthy. Where it is not found to be possible to preserve these trees, Section 18.150.070.D requires a mitigation program so that there is no net loss of caliper inches where a development proposal is to retain less than 25 percent of the existing trees. The plan shall mitigate the total number of caliper inches of healthy trees that are lost. :: ,THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE: VALID FOR 18 MONTHS • FROM THE DATE OF THIS DECISION. ' SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is developed with an office building that is occupied by a veterinary clinic. Variance 88 -32 and Sign Code Exception 88 -05 concerning the height and size of a proposed sign and related structures were filed by the current property owner. The City • has no record of any more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0006NAR 96-0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 2 To the n : Lh the site is adjoined by a frontage road that provides access to the property from SW Pacific Highway and is park of the State Highway right-of-way. To the west of this parcel is Highway 217. To the south and east the property is adjoined by the Costo Store. a lie inforrraa iotl d Propasai Desr ptlo The northerly portion of the site is presently developed with a Veterinary Clinic. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit Approval to develop a 130-foot cellular communications tower facility and related equipment structures. A Variance to the type of material to be used for access to this facility has also been requested. The applicant has requested to use gravel instead of an asphalt or concrete pavement surface for the proposed driveway to the monopole facility. SECTIQNI B AFPLIGAELE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Ilse Cl s i toation: The applicant is proposing to build a 130 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities, as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requires ents, Section 18.+62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 16% landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the leasehold area that is proposed to be developed. The plan appears to provide in excess of the 15% minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface ratio within the leasehold area. Setback: Section 18.56.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street. No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. The site does not adjoin a residential zoning district and, therefore, complies with the setback standards of the General Commercial Zoning District. Buil Ping He rght Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18,98.020 states that any building located in a non-residential ' zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height. Although the existing Veterinary Clinic has existing STAFF REcIORT CUP MIVAR 9"010 - WESTERN PCs MONOPOLE Page 3 street trees, these trees are not in compliance with this standard due to their spacing and the total property frontage. It is recommended that this section be found to be not applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non-conforming through the development of a new cellular communications use. This determination is consistent with the Non-Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C). Screening ecial Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped panting areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has not proposed to develop a parking lot in conjunction with this use, therefore, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right-of-ways, or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area farmed by measuring a 30-foot distance along the street right-of-way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30-foot distance paints with a straight line. A clear vision area :shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fences wail structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum C, WStreet ('arkina: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant has not provided a parking lot to serve this development. Because there is no minimum parking ratio for this type of facility, no off- street parking has been provided. Access: Section 18.108.0180 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30-feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet This use does not require that parking spaces be provided so two way access is also not needed to serve this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review any necessary revisions will be made to this plan to address fire vehicle access. Site Development Review - A~val Sfiandards Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires than a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Cade. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections STAFF REPORT CUP 96-W06NAR 9"010 -WEST ERN PCs MONOPOLE Page 4 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 13.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134 18.160 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards; Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously, listed sections. .These other .standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas_ Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas; Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.160.2 (Tree Removal) is reviewed elsewhere within this report under Section 18.150. Buffering. Screening and Cgm atibility Between Adjoining Uses. Section 13.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses.. The applicant has provided a mixture of screening and buffering materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Clue to its 130-feet height and its communications purpose, it is not passible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. The monopole itself has not been designed to attract attention more so than ether similar freeway interchange light standards. Section 18.120.108.4(8) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parting lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings. Other existing trees within the adjoining State Highway right-of-ways are also expected to partially screen this facility. Crime Prevention and Safe : Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shalt be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Conditional Use:. Section 18.130.040 contains the fallowing general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-00051VAR 96-0010 -WESTERN PGs MONOPOLE Page 5 The use, a proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing trees will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by-this µ proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The location criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minimum of a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to W Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. a l nc_..e: Section 18.134.060 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request for a Variance. The applicant has requested a Variance from Section 18.106.050 (J) that requires all areas for vehicle maneuvering to be paved with an asphalt or concrete surface. The applicant has proposed to gravel the driveway that would provide access to the proposed monopole facility. A Variance to a development standard may be approved where the following findings can be made: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same _ zoning district or vicinity; Due to its limited nature, the proposed driveway pavement material Variance has not been found to be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title. The proposed Variance is also not in conflict with specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0006/VAR 96-0010 - WESTERN FCS MONOPOLE Page 6 There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the tot size, shape, topography or ether circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Due to the developed nature of much of the property width alone the site's Public Street frontage, developing this facility towards the street would limit the future development of this property to provide access to a facility that rarely requires access. 3. The use proposed will be the saute as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The Variance is to a development standard and has not been proposed to allow a use than is not permitted in the General Commercial Zoning District. A Utility use is allowed under a Conditional Use Permit, ashas been proposed. The Variance allows economic use of a smaller undeveloped portion of an existing commercially developed property. By allowing the Variance, future additional development of the property can take place without requiring reconstruction of a paved access driveway. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land farms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The variance allows the applicant to avoid constructing pavement of a driveway to serve a small portion of a partially developed commercial site. The nature of the variance is limited in nature such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by this change. The Variance will allow additional use of a partially developed commercial site without precluding additional, more intensive commercial land uses that are permitted within the General Commercial Zoning District. The Oregon Department of Transportation had no comment on the use of gravel in this instance. 5. The hardship is not self imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that site constraints such as the partially developed nature of the property, its size and shape, and the limited need for .access of this proposed facility dictate its location. Construction of a gravel driveway of 15 feet in width allows emergency vehicle and monthly maintenance vehicle access to the facility and is, therefore, the minimum Variance necessary for this purpose. Tree 1emova : Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a subdivision application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a site plan that identifies all existing trees greater than twelve inches in caliper. The applicant has proposed to remove all 11 trees within the area proposed to be developed with this use. Three of the 11 trees are located along the northerly portion of the site and were found to be healthy. The applicant shall review realignment of the proposed gravel driveway and the proposed fencing with the arborist in order to preserve these trees if possible. STAFF REPORT CUP 9"0061VAR 96-0010 -WESTERN PCs MONOPOLE Page 7 Where it is not found to be possible to preserve these trees, a tree mitigation program shall be provided so that there is no net loss of caliper inches where less than 25 percent of the existing healthy trees are to be preserved. The plan small mitigate the total number of caliper inches of healthy trees that are lost. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: 1. Retention of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in capper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees, 2. Retention of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with 18.150.070.D; . Retention of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 1 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; 4. Retention of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: 1. A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. 2. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. 3. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 4. The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. . The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Sub-section D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement. This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 1 inches in caliper. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0006/VAR 96-0010 - WESTERN PGs MONOPOLE Page 8 The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend ether utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six feet in height. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY QQMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation, Aeronautics Division reviewed this application and had the following comment: The proposed` tower shall be lighted with a dual fitted red obstruction light mounted on top of the structure in accordance with Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 7017460, Chapters 4, 5 and 13. The Oregon Department of Transportation, Engineering Division reviewed this application and had the following comment: No new access will be permitted to SW Pacific Highway West. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, for the new driveway to be constructed to the frontage road that provides access to SW Pacific Highway. The applicant shall pave a minimum of a 20-foot paved driveway shall be constructed from the edge of the existing frontage road. No other comments or objections have been received. August 19, 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner 9~° t~ August 19, 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard ewersdorff DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT CLIP 96-0006IVAR 96-0310 -WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 9 i f ` +wa. n wu., ~ ! iFlIl z i ~o . moo 'i t r- r x jr'. : ~cGP j ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CA NO. Western PCS Monopole EXHIBIT MAP 7 CUP 96-0006 VAR 96-0010 { 4 It j I HK~ 011MtF ~1 p yy,~ • ~ W ~ i Mw. y:i wt. . -16 ASS tAO. Vcs monopole 1 ct3'P 96-0()06 SI-Tie VAR 96-000 w ~ r i f 'PIS f ~s i P1. ■ i t a r sEyo sr Vicinity 9-000 9®00 M CUP NAR 10 Note: Map is not to scale Western. PC Monopole N • • r a.♦ A te. i ,. • • City of Tigard, Oregon '. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly swom/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (chock boa above, if apptle.el.) (Check appropriate box below) (Enter Public Heanng Date above) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) DECISION FOR: (Chock eaa aewk,Uapplicable) City of Tigard Planning Director i That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Mock box aeon. It applicable) (check appropriate box below) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director o y Tigard Planning Commission • IY Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of th- PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION /NOT 2 OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is =ttached, marked xhibit "A ", was m i_led t• }-ach namefp: son , at the addres s) shown on the attached lis (s), marked Exhi.J "B" . n /'e / ` f 3 • . • / fii .1 ; 199 e , and deposited in the Unit:d Stat: r - • n t i lp A d d- of ∎ ' . /_f/«�iPr 199 _/ , postage prepaid. /I / ii �.iity P -parA -par Noti 311 11■A ip Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the da y of a X 1 , 7 ' 1 , 1 • ..� �, , OFFICIAL SEAL "v-1, M,,,*r a DIANE M JELDERKS ' I 1 i k;." NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ` � I, l P _ ` COMMISSION NO. 046142 IF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 NOTARY PUB F OREGO ' My Commission pires: y 9 FILE I PO.•/� n � � Q / NAME(S): �,( 5 ,rf1 7 ' G.s /U &,/ CASE NO.(S): eZe, 4 s 0 , / G•4, —6' / TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: v `c • • f r: 6 UP96-0006 file CITY OF TIGARD May 9, 2002 OREGON Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Minor Modification Request of CUP96 -0006, Case File No. MMD2002 -00008 Dear Mr. Fournier: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification (MMD2002- 00008) of the approved site development and conditional use permit located at 11744 SW Pacific Highway, WCTM 1 S136CC, Tax Lot 02100. You have requested to add additional antenna array and associated equipment cabinets to the existing monopole. The submitted site and elevation plans reflect the current conditions and proposed additions. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter, states; "any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposed wireless communication facility is not required to provide any parking, pursuant to the parking demand table in TDC 18.765. Therefore, no additional on -site parking is needed. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the structure is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has proposed to establish the new antennae at 100 feet above ground level on the 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 PagP 1 of 3 • I existing 130 foot pole. No increase to the pole height is proposed. Therefore, this standard is met. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected. No changes to the site layout or accesses are proposed, therefore this criterion is satisfied. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. The existing and proposed conditional uses are similar in nature in terms of traffic generation, approximately 1 trip per month. This modification will double that trip generation to 2 trips per month, significantly below the 100 trip per day threshold. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non - residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposal will add impervious area where the concrete pad for the equipment cabinets will be located. This expansion is approximately 150 square feet, below the 5,000 square foot limitation. The expansion will also occur within the established fence enclosure. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. There is no common open space required for this type of development, therefore this standard does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and /or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. There are no specific amenities provided by the existing development. The amount of landscaping exceeds the 15% minimum required in this zone. Therefore this criterion is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. The site was developed prior to the present Wireless Communications Facility Ordinance (TDC 18.798) and was approved through a conditional use process, CUP 96 -0006. The conditions of that approval are as follows: 1. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE LIGHTING ON THE PROPOSED TOWER WITH A DUAL FITTED RED OBSTRUCTION LIGHT MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL AVIATION ADVISORY CIRCULAR 70/7460, CHAPTERS 4, 5, AND 13. Lighting was installed, and is not affected by the present proposal. • 2. THE APPLICANT SHALL OBTAIN A PERMIT FROM THE STATE OF OREGON HIGHWAY DIVISION, FOR THE NEW DRIVEWAY TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE FRONTAGE ROAD THAT PROVIDES ACCESS TO SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONSTRUCT A MINIMUM OF A 20- FOOT PAVED DRIVEWAY FROM THE EDGE OF THE EXISTING FRONTAGE ROAD. A COPY OF THE PERMIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION. This condition was apparently never satisfied, leaving the site in technical non- compliance. The present applicant has applied for the ODOT approach permit as evidenced by the materials in the application. As this condition remains outstanding, the applicant will not be able to obtain electrical /building permits until evidence that an approach permit has been obtained from ODOT is provided. Page 2 of 3 • • 3. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE CALCULATIONS CONCERNING THE PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPING TO IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE LEASEHOLD AREA. This condition was satisfied previously with the original development. The total lease area is 30x30 or 900 square feet. The two concrete pads total 262 square feet, or 29 %. This exceeds the 15% landscaping requirement. 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL REVIEW THE OPTION OF REALIGNING THE PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AND THE FENCING WITH THE ARBORIST IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE THREE TREES THAT HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE HEALTHY. WHERE IT IS NOT FOUND TO BE POSSIBLE TO PRESERVE THESE TREES, SECTION 18.150.070.D REQUIRES A MITIGATION PROGRAM SO THAT THERE IS NO NET LOSS OF CALIPER INCHES WHERE A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL IS TO RETAIN LESS THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE EXISTING TREES. THE PLAN SHALL MITIGATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CALIPER INCHES OF HEALTHY TREES THAT ARE LOST. The present request will not affect any trees on site. The applicant has included an arborist report and assessment of the tree located within the lease enclosure area to ensure it's long term viability. If the tree protection measures as specified in that report are followed, the tree should remain viable. As the above conditions are not adversely impacted, this criterion is satisfied. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. Limitations on Minor Modification Approval The applicant must submit evidence that an ODOT approach permit has been obtained prior to issuance of electrical and building permits. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639 -4171 ext. 407. Sincerely, 1/4 1,74„ Morgan Tracy Associate Planner \ \tig333 \usr\depts \curpin \morgan \workspace \sdr \mmd2002 -00008 (cingular carbucks).doc • Page 3 of 3 • Amotowle"- CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0006 VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 FILE TITLE: WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum 7535 B NE Ambassador Place 21390 SW Edy Road Portland, OR 97220 Sherwood, OR 97140 (503) 284 -8714 (503) 625 -7171 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. 2 ,000 ciA4 LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE ((� REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Dev,I6pment Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: T.B.A. TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639 -4171 x317 CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS PO• a . s �� Wd 5//6/q6 :_ k CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Go ktihq 0644 ash re 14 1 • Vet v' a4Ce 7 CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO .( ff R' 1p (SOD OTHER CASE NO'S: 6 -QQ RECEIPT NO. %- 2-`60t7C APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: -6. q ty`-• DATE: () • 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION 11744 SW Pacific Hwy. ✓ (A Application form (1) I (B) Owner's signature /written E TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. 1S1 36CC Tax Lot 2100 authorization I I ` • o SITE SIZE approx. 1/2 acre ylq (D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* Hans & Marilyn Grunbaun E Plot plan (pre -app checklist - ADDRESS 21390 S.W. Edy Road PHONE 625 -7171 1/(F) Applicant's statement CITY Sherwood, Oregon ZIP 97140 (pre -app checklist) APPLICANT* Western PCS Corporation k a (C) List of property owners and ADDRESS7535B NE Ambassador Pl. PHONE 284-8714 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Portland, OR. ZIP 97220 l' Filing fee ( 6 ) "�.+ • *When the owner and the applicant are different = - - ' r people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DE ERMI ED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written 2( (76 Authorization. The owners) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: / / 2„ 4 16 submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY ( _ 6 �I -6 The owners of record of the subject property ( Cr �_ request site development review approval to Las allow an unmanned cellular Approval Date: communications tower. Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0524P/13P Rev'd 5/87 0 3. List any variance, conditional use, sensitive lands, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: conditional use and variance 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read -the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this day of 19 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. (see attached letter of authorization) (KSL:pm /0524P) I - - KOLL THE REAL ESTATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES SERVICES COMPANY DATE: 1 1(51/'j OWNER/OWNER'S AGENT: y^, 01/41.S �r'uii bw,n SITE NAME /SITE NO.: PO ` 13 73. Green e/07 SITE ADDRESS 1 /7gcf 5 w p /fi DEAR: I i >r. 6 !r th Win Western PCS is interested in leasing a portion of the above referenced property to construct and operate a communications facility. In order to determine the feasibility of locating such a facility on the property, and potentially entering into good faith lease negotiations, we require the owner or the owner's representative to provide us permission to enter the property for testing purposes. In addition, we require authorization to apply and obtain governmental permits and licenses. By signing this letter, you are granting Western PCS and its agents the "Access Right" to enter the property to conduct surveys, soils studies, engineering studies, drive tests or to perform any required task to determine the feasibility of constructing and operating a communications facility. You are also granting Western PCS the authorization to apply for and obtain all necessary building, construction and other governmental permits and licenses required for construction and use of the facility. All such tests, studies and applications shall be at the sole cost and risk of Western PCS. If any portion of the property is disturbed by Western PCS, Western shall restore /repair any such areas to their condition prior to the activity. Both the owner and/or owner's agent and Western PCS acknowledge that no representations or commitments have been made that a lease agreement (or similar agreement) concerning this property will be entered into in the future. Execution of this letter by owner or owner's agent and Western PCS confirms the understanding of he : arties on these matters. l7) 5-qc Ow er - Dat ' ■■ t( ' e.1 Estate • • rdinator Date 7535B N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -8714 FAX (503) 288 -5741 • . . . . .,..:, , , . , . :.,1 . ..; .... .„ ... . 1. , ,,, ...... 1......:. . : . .;.'.. -• •.:•.: '.. .i'..'. .7 '''''''' ' '.. 1.**: * :*. • . ..'''.. - .:*- '''''• ''Ail ' ' l • .... . . usus..0 —.... • : l e . 0 .1 01aLma : : ,* 13 r.....anomit or .7 ... .. 1,.,,.....,,,, .:. ' ..... . • ■, ". ... • . ...- . 7-.. ,..: . ..''; .....'. •••••,•• :..."..'; ','.: i'....... ::::F.: • , '.''''',. ...- 1 ' * .. . . !t: ' n ' . • ' .. . .• " * • s • .* .' '. • * .• .' .. 1 I . i , . . ., . . •„, • 1 0 FOAM No, 933 - WiANANTY OECD - GIANTS/9Y FORM (Individual Grantot). . . NA . /AA t t • . • ....... g - % WARRANTY DEED-8TATITYORY FORM ...... INDIVIDUAL GRANTOR .. ......,:; 9,0 . r ... H7NS H. GRVNB4PM aD4 NABION KA GRXINDAPB ...... l' .. •...... conveys and warrants to 1 4 1 4 1 $ HA GKINBAC citnia 1 . A • gE1M4034...74igtrATA10...44..00...GZIAbitIML::...- - • Family Tx WILA clt..4 ' 6j21/94 •...• •. .. ' • . , Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in Washington County, Oregon, to-t; .. . • , See Attached Exhibit A • ,.. ...f. ' : ..'; •4';'. ..• : • .. • 'ir; .• • ' •'. ' . • '04 !61 . • .. • .• • ...., :t' • ..t..! . • . • • '. '•, . il (IF SPACE INSUFFICIENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDE) .:..1.... ... The property is free from encumbrances except • • -.• s -• .. '.;.1. . ... ; • . ... • , . , :....• ..,....... ! ; : .. „ . • ,• The true consideration for this conveyance is $ —°— (Here comply with the requirements Of ORS 93.030 ''4.... property or value other than money - s.;:4-'' • • - ... ..4.;' . i. ' • ...: . i)•,. Dated this 21st day of June , 19 94 . THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS i INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. • Hans H. Grunbaum .- . • • BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE . • ••• • IV TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CRY OR COUNTY • PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY V,. 0...:1(.11.24/jvc • • •-•,::::":". •:" , . . • • , l AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN M lyn IC. runbaum " ' . .;,. . i•, ), STATE OF OREGON, County of Multnomah ..• .. )ss- . This instrument was acknowledged before me on June 21 • • , H. ; • . • • -um and Marilyn 4 Grunbaum lik • •' ., ri .---,,,•,-, .,,,.,.,..,„..--ct._-................:..-...:4.-..-> p.... I is i. ( ••7 • • . - - • tii:PCIAL SEM. ?) / • 1 * -•:.i''. ii.,''' ''' vi:' AN KELLEY 6 .../. . .,/ i [... 0.' .." 4.,,,............' ,.s'i.....;T"OREGON . 9 .-. "...... ■ ..g` • •-.10N NO.012378 ,', . 41651;F ot ," %bl Iregon --" i . i t I.. • S JAN 14 r'i.., .. - ‘.:: ppi • .-- .• : • - .•,,::?i':::,.;:e:;:i. 9 My commission expires /7K17: • .. • ..■ . f. 'Teti ! : ' - WARRANTY DEED : STATE OF OREGO • • . 1 Hans H. & Marilyn K. Grunbaum REGON, . • I ,. plans H. & Marilyn K. Grunbaum, riqffee.... 21390 S. W. Edy Road GRANTEE County of . t t S. . sgai.:: 1 Sherwood, OR 97140 • . I certify that the within instrtz-... I GRANTEE'S ADDRESS, ZIP ..................... merit was received for record on the After recording return 10: day of i 1 2- . •,..4 .. '' John H. Rosenfeld SPACE RESERVED at o'clock M., and recarded .....* ••• . • ' ,. • 1600 Pioneer Tower FO in book/reel/volume No on .. ,P : R 888 S. W. Fifth Avenue RECORDER'S USE page or as fee/file/instru- j • Portland, OR 97204 ment/microfilm/reception No , Zittop • -. NAME. ADDRESS. ZIP Record of Deeds of said County. Until a change I9 requested, all tax statements Witness my hand and seal. of „ .• shall be cent to the following address: County affixed. . . ,. 1;0; ' • No Change Requested . •Li!, . NAME • • TITLE , wo.T.e By Deputy.. : 1 ! . ;:...."';•ir, NAME. ADDRESS. ZIP I ----- • ..'••••• • • ',.',. . .• 10,0, ,o,i;,,,;.;.-a .,,q,;:ogifii2v,:" ,,,r.',.',It.:v.1:7",„AV,4r.,47t0,,,yb,t;20,4,rno;;;.,:i'Vej,!;,..k;;',j:Xl;,:e,::i4,;;-,..,'A,..?.:,4::•••••,?•6.;:i:',::••/.44zmAniAns7467.0.,:e!reait4r • ,..i. •.: •...m.z''w.'''.'e-.f.r.'41',,i;T...411t*r214iA0--NI.g..7)./? '''''r—'i , , • . • - ' ' • a -;:".., f.: .. 1 11, '. EXHIBIT A , ,' } TO I I WARRANTY DEED BETWEEN '. "1' 1 HANS H. GRUNBAUM AND MARILYN K. GRUNBAUM, GRANTOR, R 1 AND HANS H. GRUNBAUM AND MARILYN K. GRUNBAUM, TRUSTEES, GRANTEE •'I DATED: JUNE 21, 1994 I 1, ) !, � I 1! The north 60 feet of the following described tract of I' land in Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the '.' � .'. • ' Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, to -wit: ' I1 Beginning at the northeast corner of that certain tract :r i; :,1 • of land in the George Richardson Donation Land Claim No : ;; 55, Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, �` , I r 1 ' 1 Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, conveyed -' .i ,r to Ralph L. Palmer and Elma E. Palmer by deed recorded on ~ '; _ 1 i ' r I i page 759 of Book 251, Washington County Deed Records; and "' �'` ..' 1' running thence along the east line of the Palmer tract . :' - ' .' ;� I south 0° 08' east 39.4 feet to an iron rod set south 52° "'- "' •• `- ; ' 23' west 25.0 feet from thb northwest corner of Lot 1 of 1,1:''• t„... , TWIN OAKS LANE, a plat of record; thence continuing along :". a+/t=;l�' ; the east line of the Palmer tract south 0° 08' east 194.8 > '';,`.'. �' , ,� , feet t o an iron rod which is the point of beginning of :; �,, � 1 , , the tract hereinafter described; thence from said true I; point of beginning running south 89° 43' west 192.8 feet v z ,,- 1 I • to an iron rod; thence south 0° 08' east 154.0 feet to an . _ ?`', ! :,:y.r. , •,;1...... , •;:.' 1 • 111 iron rod on the south line of the Palmer tract north 89° `::� :-; : 4-•. • 43' east 100 feet from the southwest corner thereof; :; -7g - :'.,� thence following said south line north 89° 43' east 192.8 '. •? ' feet to the southeast corner of the Palmer tract; thence ;..:..;,,:; north 0° 08' west 154.0 feet to the true point of ; : beginning; excepting therefrom that portion thereof d,' ,`:" ..� - 1 conveyed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State ' - :.-- Highway Commission, by deed recorded January 3, 1964, in �: i•y ` .... : -1.' Book 503, page 463, Washington County Records. : < ^ _ , 1 f lint' . r. . , _ . 14,,f,,,, . Ff.. 1 .� I � q. , .w: . it. .'YCr:•. ; 1 y( y �f. • T ./ " • ' �'•''T j •.„ ',„ �•. 'p'•: i`'�'r' tr. ,: �T!"lrv. • t•. # ,,... .,.r i•r . ,, I ,:;,,,9 M f :*,,- 1 i. • ' . �, y bo . •. ye., •'. .. : , .,., .., . , - ::�F' y -, } .: , • . L e i. ,. a,`.? ) , ./.,.1 g=•.. ✓.. � • 5.•, �•, , 7v :.•.•�.�,e�,���i�C���lt��.� ,�� ,..''•'�'� "•�,j,•• , y !:: t.v✓F , -- • - .. 'V l l'•� . 1 ' a l SLA i �K• l: f . Pi A .-C 01 . . 1 ,.• i .ra •, :.r I I' . 94 065795. ::r .. , „ ;. , �; . Washington County { ;, Page 1 of • ° ;r .':c > f.' fP . .1. . ::c'ril!q �l l' C9,1p_z• ^l�,`4 • . • . 2' ,. #;A:..' , 4 5 . i [, or. i: • • .. .. • I , i l .;; i ( :: I. I I ;lt • STATEOFOREGON rt ?�1 i County of Washington SS - : • I, Jerry A Fiansorr, Director of Assess- !,..-,;44,.-n: , 1 • ment and •;TdcationE_7C?Otfkclo County k',:a Clerk for _esisl oust ttyy,” dci „be tby,Eertify that ° �{ . � the withItilnstnlrrientof writhi (nra §received * s• • , . °' and rey�orded:Ih bock ,, bt•rreoottds: cif said .:`••. Jerry` Hanson ..birector of � : .. _ • `, Assest1meitt'arid•Taxation, Ex- • • Officfo;Courfty Clerk '' .- 1 ,• : ':� • : : :fi is Doc : 94065795 i' 38.00 : 1 •;: ° '4 Rect: 125927 ff .''' 07/11/1994 7/11/1994 01: 11 : 31PM I, ,. . ! '1 . `:v : • -r. - -- , • ._.�__ i:. - t ; -.:':; T :7. '- 1,I • • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: Ci of Ti .., .. .Planning Division . : ....:. .... . . 13125 SW Hall Boulevard ..: .. Tigard, OR 97223 I, 4)so- ` �,, r+ft1 -- , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 13o - i + Mao .,o o le- affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and /or tax lot(s) currently registered) 1 1 7 l' SW " P A c , F a - - f f i n N , h 4iz o5 OE ( 177-Z3 , and did on the Z3' day of MA-1 , 19 dl( personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a coW +,' o.la ( U.S- e application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. . The sign was posted at 1 urIz1TY ?OLE. •F:)1z- - r - H-csT NIo1fT14:F n A ) T?+ti T .,o Pi p rY (state location you posted notice on property) itlrpy Sign re n . rese ce of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the Z 3 � day of , 1914. • t / .. f ..c. .. ::....... ,...,...,..:.2::...,.....,- ILII ..1i. 4,4..." Alia °:�,,� N I RY PUB OF OREGON I r. MY C(„1111ivli _ id c_ .. .. . . - , - :�._:.. My Commission Expire (1(3['l1 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: 3rr 44 -i 313 g G (tc..u4 R r c6, I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: CD "I 11� U51. Name of Applicant/Owner: (A,f$7Ri N) 1 �S C'„r e..Kanc N Address or General Location of Subject Property: I Address J P rtY: 1 1 7YY Si Ai - ?44-., Pcc M•y L Subject Prope_ry Tax Map(s) and Lot 74(s): JSJ ? ( CC. 21 00 t1:: slog impatty vrast ers ∎ af; pos t. ms • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. City of Tigard ) I. 11 co _ , being duly sworn, depose and say that on l'14 -Y zz , 19:1 I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached. list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) i1 7Y'/ ,SW f AC1 sc ttW`( 97223 a copy of which not so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 74, NE A ►Q Qnt-r Wri with postage prepaid thereon. • 44PP fl Si n - presen.- •f a otary Public) • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) • Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the 23v day of ticul , 192,L. .�L • • . 1, � . : '' ,. : ..�` ��== ~'''�`° NoT RY PUBLI OF OREGON My Commission Expires: ( 71 -3661 (Applicant. please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) • NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: Sax. it I 37 -3 C- ',Rs1..r'R TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Co,i0/1),,,,//Lt- c / I Name of Applicant :Owner.. (AA Cmq n1 - PCS C..0, Address or General Location of Subject Property: 1 17YP-I SW . Fc- L Subject Property Tat Map(s) and Lot T(s): 1 5 I i( ?, i 00 J h: `Jog in loartyvnast ers tartma d. mst • • I Q) xk� y 7 western` wireless May 22, 1996 Chevron USA Inc. Property Tax Division PO Box 7611 San Francisco, California 94120 -7611 Koll Telecommunications 7535 B N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, Oregon 97220 Dear Sir or Madam: The Western PCS Corporation is in the process of establishing a new cellular phone system in the Portland Metropolitan Area. This system uses new digital technology to provide a higher quality of wireless communication. To better serve your area, Western PCS has proposed an unmanned communication facility, including a 130 foot monopole, on the Tigard Veterinary Clinic property located at 11744 SW Pacific Highway in Tigard. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, Western PCS would like to discuss the proposed facility in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on: Monday, June 10, 1996 7:00 PM Tigard City Hall Red Rock Creek Room 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 If you have any questions regarding this meeting, please call Mike Birndorf at 284 -8714. Western PCS looks forward to serving you and your community in the near future. Sincerely ichael Birndorf Koll Telecommunications Western Wireless Corporation 7535 NE Ambassador Place, Ste B Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -2255 FAX (503) 284 -0402 For: Of: KOLL By: Priscilla Sargent Stephen Barasch MONAGHAN FARMS INC WAREMART INC 485 W Milwaukee St 14120 E Evans Ave PO Box 5756 Detroit, MI 48202 -3220 Aurora, CO 80014 -1431 Boise, ID 83705 -0756 CHEVRON U S A INC CHEVRON USA INC 575 Market.St #1834 PROPERTY TAX DIVISIO Mary Jensine Myers San Francisco, CA PO Box 7611 PO Box 880 94105 -2823 San Francisco, CA Sherwood, OR 97140 -0880 94120 -7611 Stanley McGrath Ted Millar PO Box 880 3030 SW Moody Ave #200 Sherwood, OR 97140 -0880 7 Portland, OR 97201 -4867 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORA PO Box 5909 PO Box 97077 Portland, OR 97228 -5909 Kirkland, WA 98083 -9777 . . ,.. • •• , - '-:.: 1 -. . ,• • • ''. !!'• : • • - • . • ,, .,... . ' • -- ...:F - ..:::';:.: • :•••• -: !•• ii• !". -- -:: 4::: '...i ; . . •- • •*-,;;;;: .34 • • - . ' . .•:.:.,;!,:- ., . -.- -- • ..:•F • • •• •!....:;•,:i.I..:::.::.-..: • .- . - II t. . . . • , . i• •.::::•:•••• ' : . • ::..:•; - 1 ::r. ; • • • • • . •:::::: ::, '... . . • „... ' '' • ,- • • ••••• . ••• ••• • , p. .- • , . . .. ., . . : •••• '-::'.: - - • ' ' . ; -:.-..., ..:.•-• ' .• • ; . . ........, . • • - • . '."::;••:::-,': r. ': • . , ... ..; : : '•• - -.'. • • :•Ai . • • • • - . „..... . . ••• • • • • . - . -: . -. • :. '-:': ••• : .::: . ,:".: .• .- ' •:;• :•••,1;;-; ,:•::•::...1.i • • 1 . . . ,., .„. . . .. • • - ' ;: ;!! • ; . - : .:. ) : ;•':,••• 4 . 1 '..' . • • . - :- ... .. . . . ... . . , ... . . . . • : • '[.. ',.. . :: ri; ,. .'.... ! .; I•i, •••• • • '' • • • • •• - • ..... ,..• • - - - •:!'" .-••!.;I:•:•••••••:1 . . -. . - • • ' • •-- ::'• :. - • : - : - . . . : . . - • .-;.•• .•,.: :.: . . ,. • . .1.: • - :.: :::, •,•;:, : :.... : . '• -: - • • 3 . : • •••• ' ' . . : -.-',. ;• •••••.: :-. ..,. -...,„ .. . . , .. . . • • ••• •• '{er.; • • -:••::'.i.,.••••;!, . - r • ' • .. !.........1-"-• • ; '•: . „ • . ,. . . -. s,.. - .: c• - 4 . : - : f .,::; •*-- . „ • ..; ••• . tii • '; 1 : " il, .. • • • .-:, - • : •'!:-.:-1 • : - - - • , • I: • • : ' .• . • • - •. I F: .. . "I... ,:. .. • • •• . •". :. ; ..... . . . . - - • .. '•••.' ' .1 ';';:/.::,`'' '. . ... ..... • 5,.. 4.•;4.;:: ; . r ': • ' ' i: • - • • - • ,. . • • ... ••••,:.,.. . :;;:•.:.•:.::..::: • .• , , ,:•• ,;; '; • - ..;:. : . • ; • 1 • '• ' ' .' . , • . •;,•;!•1••'-,' :•'., ..; '•••'• Ti.;• .:•! :'. 1 . , %. ,..1... ::: • , : . . - . • • .. .. , ■•PV: • •: . ' 11::.::: :•' ;'• ;•'• : • '' ' . : : '. . . • : : . • . :. :: -:: •••;,•-: .-;,,. ; , , • •. • • . : . . i . .-: '... '' •-; • • .. • '■ 4 Ii':.:•: ::::/::•; ... •,;-. ' . 1 4••; . • .... ; ,. .,:!:`...i . -:■• • .S '' • ' ' , - . , . - ••''' •:••,;•:;:', Z: . r. •• • •-•; .1": P :di i . :!.. ,.••• • - • • T ' .•:;1• ::.:1;7' ' • - . • . . .•- . •: ••••::::.",::..:...:),,......'.'..,',1;'.:: t•,. ' • ,, iy:',"'''•••:• :,: :••• -:•.' : • ...,H•:!i'0 '.; :' '. . ..' ::: ; ....', .;: , . - . • ,, . f,"- :I • ; • : .. '•'•• -','• • '. ;''', ••••••••:' ".• ..'• • . • _ • :::::: - ;!:':';;;'.:i:"!... - .. , . • . . • •••!!': ' ,' " !1';' , ; 1 .0..-rill::,, :•': . . . : ...•, ,:: • • --,• ......!- ;: !,- • • - .....;••• i sm. •,:••,...; :.• - ; -..•:! . , ••••. ..,,;! -,•;: ;. :- : .:. • • .: • i . ,..,.,!. ; . , • ! : • : ,".• i. •:: ::•;* ' ' • ''' • ' - •••'-q ::.::.!.:i.• •:,.-•:! : .,,i ; ; • ' ' ; •• :. .":! •::•- ; • ' . •„.. ,-, 40.1..... !,'• . • • • • , :2 - '•:' • ' • . -.,:-.-:'!!: • •`.. :s• • • . • . • ;',.; ...it • ;•-• ' • '• • ` • ' '-'''• • "- '';',.:'•• ' - :'' '- • . ' . • .t : ■• • • •• .. •... , I' XI:, •,: : . .t . . . „.. , - • •• I • . • ...'•;:•;::„II 31; i'....... ' ::... .. . .:.:•• •;•:.%:: : :1....... :, ;,...:::. : ..., . ::?.,-;;,gra.13:•1.i;* '..',.. ' , ; ... ' '.. . ...!..: . : : • • • • : ;:l . • .. .. '. " I . .. • • ' '1 .. P. : :'• •••'..:;...;'...:. ••''' • 1 . •• . . • ::',(•-•.• ' ' ' • ' • . - • • - . - ; '..... •: ....i ::' ...f . -.- •••:•:: • ZI!':-.!! ' !. " • .• -;!,..:!,., ...• •••••:, ..... ,• -. • ' • •• •••.' ,! : • :: : 74' . :;;':',....:::: .. ..T•L'! : •...• • ;- • . • ' ' ' . ! -;:,....... •'' : ;:. •'• , , . '' •••,, , '.. '.• '.1 '..:: • I ' . : - .-• . : , . ' • ., , '-i •••••••!' ': ••' ' -....'...--.. .::. : : : :::.:•.:•::,-....., : •' '•.• ' . -... • .• .- . !, : . .- •!..••• . '': . : . : ... r': . --!1-: •••••:: • ; :.;",-: ''''' !o:' '-':' •• • . ' :!" :-.••::-:'-' -:::!:::::: • '•-•:-,;• . : ' . : ':• :,' '' ,.; !:i!'•IP"''.'•;':'.'''-:. . .., h. -• , • -••• v !, : ," ' .. . ; ' 1 ' . :." : , .1 • : !.•, . • ...: -... -:.-.;•,,,,,-:;!.!:,.. ..!, -.:: • • :2..... „.; ,, ■ • ! • , -.,-.-,. ,!...:: ,,,:.:,..!:; ''; ; --. - - .• •.! ' . ''.;!:! : .' ,:•, • - il. ,•''.• , '; ''''.: '" • ''''... ''•• '." : A. - • : ! . -, ... • ••''.,,' :',!!!';'','... - •••••• - •,, .;!•,:, ''!' ; : •• ' ' ......,.... .. - ..... •1'...2'. •••••••, '.:...' '''''' '' 'J • •• . -• . ' ,,, Li . ..;....:L.:J.:._ - _-:._.-. -:!.... • 1 t.I . . . .,., • : • "; v i:-; -- i ... -•••,-, I ;-: • . - .. ... • 1 : • . - • y y western•• • - .:.. ,•:,,,,,. ,,,, N e .: i ;•tt -•t• ys •:•-• -:-• -..-- . • '- - -..0 ' ! • i A A wireless l''. PM 3 -A p ;•/ -,—..--. ; , • • •4 • . 14' IV • - • . />' .. • .& •‘ ‘, 4: If•tti ‘ t •••■•: k) -'./ ;•'' 1 • . • • ' • .. 7535 NE Ambassador Place, Ste B ::,... j i --- 1; ' 4 ;410 ---: , . . • Portland, OR 97220 . . . . .: . • . . : . . • • --r::) • . • ( . . -_,., • • • CHEVRON USA INC • . .• PROPERTY TAX DIVISIO ..- . . ".„,im..... >-- PO Box 7611 • ,.........,.......„..-....._ _. .----- . San Franc ' CHEV11 941203002 1C94 05/29/96 .. 94120-761 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND :CHEVRON CORP . . PO SOX 285 .. .. HOUSTON TX 77001-0285 . . .. .. RETURN TO SENDER • V: . ,, i4i20-76ii Ilhipil Ihdliiilmil„,111,ill 1111,iiii,„li,„1 -i- • • • . .. ... :•••• •• • • • -• :-...,-,.., .;:: :: • - :::-- -. :-: 7 5. •,. ' ' otr:-;` - "' - - - r - : '."-r -,- ;•!:' -, r. - --tc7...i , 77.7:7*--.r- - .1::•. , :.; — - ...• - . s !--4p-,,-...,....--- , :. 4 - -..„- ..... - - ---, - - -•,....,-,4frz..--,.....4..-,,,,,,z . - - - - ... ;,. -....• .- - .. . - . ? . - : '' '' ''' '' •• - ... ,-: `F.;:r::: .tii: 1 ... . '. , .- - • : r'': -. : . • ... :.-, .. ,;•!,.,. , :fs.:!-!.. , .... • .. - -..; ..■.•-■;:::-,.,.,•;.•:. ;;',.. .• • :;_;:',;:. ',. • , .,:1,: ,; ..!•:: , --;•••,;: ' •••:•• ' - .., -•; f ; ,;'- . -7 : • •.'..:: ,.,' •-•;!:.': ..• ; • • -- ... -. , ; .. • .. ...::: • : . ,,..,, -. - • - :: ..; :;., r....;,..i - •• • 1: 1' . ••• • •• ‘• ... .. . . ..I C• '.,;• '' ', • ••i::::,; 4 -".i .- .... •: • ";!• ;;• ' ;•: .'. - • ' ' • ' - _ i, • . : •L : . • ; ' • -" • • • • . • '' •••• -s li'' ; :!1-• . I•- •:'!'... • -: t •-- 1 %:- • : ;;.• •':':::•r..: ›,:;.:•:.• '•:'. ,•!•'-',•••OTI411:1••:c.:;..• ; _i . : ' : ' ' • , -,-.T 1%. .•.i:ii,;' . ' . .... . • . . . . ..... . • .: • : .:,;:i . ..;• -;:.:.,,, • -- • .-,, •.:,... •••:• , -• • i..._ ,. :. ,:- • :•• • ..::,•:1:• i,• I • •••• •.• ,';-• :';;'14;'";;`• .. it:::■ -. ' ; ... - 1•::!-'.:. : :• ,' • : • • • . ...•.:•••,i::..,:r. .. • ... . ::, - iv- .:. ; -• ._- . ---? -,, -: ::•• • -: •r,....: • • ,. :••••.!... ': ; - • ...! ri0:."•.:::::;.-1 ••••' • ::qt!. '1 " KOLL' THE REAL ESTATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES SERVICES COMPANY DATE: t j( s - 7 G j�j OWN. AGENT: •-r. Z��125 C/ y'�i ,'CLC(�YI SITE NAME /SITE NO.: Po ` l3 7 ! 3 • B crire rY U SITE ADDRESS l j S z ,, ✓ c / n c '.,,, DEAR: 7) 6Y-r /� CZ 0 Western PCS is interested in leasing a portion of the above referenced property to construct and operate a communications facility. In order to determine the feasibility of locating such a facility on the property, and potentially entering into good faith lease negotiations, we require the owner or the owner's representative to provide us permission to enter the property for testing purposes. In addition, we require authorization to apply and obtain governmental permits and licenses. By signing this letter, you are granting Western PCS and its agents the "Access Fight" to enter the property to conduct surveys, soils studies, engineering studies, drive tests or to perform any required task to determine the feasibility of constructing and operating a communications facility. You are also granting Western PCS the authorization to apply for and obtain all necessary building, construction and other governmental permits and licenses required for construction and use of the facility. All such tests, studies and applications shall be at the sole cost and risk of Western PCS. If any portion of the property is disturbed by Western PCS, Western shall restore /repair any such areas to their condition prior to the activity. Both the owner and/or owner's agent and Western PCS acknowledge that no . • representations or commitments have been made that a lease agreement (or similar agreement) concerning this property will be entered into in the future. Execution of this letter by owner or owner's agent and Western PCS confirms the understanding of h- :arties on these matters. 01'0 ��- S 0 er Date At : /. /-/ e.1 Estate .. rdinator Date 753513 N.E.,Ambassador Place Portland. OR 972220 (503) 281.8714 FAX (503)'_88 -5711 • Sus? n„ 0, d C201 pgdo 2/DO ialY /127/ tg /v/ rva • KOLL THE REAL ESTATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES SERVICES COMPANY 6/29/96 Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Enclosed is the original arborist report for the proposed cellular site at the vet clinic on Pacific Highway. Sincerely, Michael Birndorf 7535B N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -8714 FAX (503) 288 -5741 • • • HALSTEAD'S • ARBORICULTURE 'Specialists in the care and preservation of trees" `'� CONSULTANTS David Halstead, Consultant B.S - P.O. Box 1182, Tualatin, OR 97062 I' Phone: (503) 245-1383 June 20, 1996 • V ATTN.: Mr. John Silenzi Koll Company 7535 NE Ambassador Place Suite "B" / " Portland, OR 97220 w 'i Reference: Tree Assessment 'IA Location: Greenburg Site Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan _ / jtf I have inspected the site and the Site Plan dated 5/9/96, prepared by David Evans & Associates for the purpose of providing 'Olt !I. a tree preservation, removal, and mitigation plan. 4.0•. After inspecting each tree, identifying the species and taking ' careful measurements I offer the following: General Field Conditions. There are 11 existing trees over 12 inches in caliper on this site. The landscape plan shows 8 trees on the site. ,. Most of the trees on this site were planted approximately 25 , years ago. r '! Due to the variety of species, the symmetry of planting and their age it is apparent that the trees are not indigenous to the site, although many are native to this area. 1 Individual Tree Preservation Inventory. Out of the 11 trees on the site 8 trees are hazardous, diseased and insect infested and 3 will have to be removed because of the smallness of the site, proposed driveway and parking area. • f • • Page 2 June 10, 1996 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Greenburg Site Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan Starting at the north west corner of the property and proceeding south along the property the the mitigated trees are tagged number 1 and 2 and 3. The remaining trees which are hazardous are tagged number 4 through 11. Tree Numbered 1: Western Red -cedar 22 inches Caliber Tree numbered 2: Western Red -cedar 23 inches Caliber Tree Numbered 3: European Weeping Birch 24 inches Caliber Tree Number 4: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 18 inches, an approximate height of 50 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 5: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 12 inches, an approximate height of 45 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 6: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 22 inches, an approximate height of 55 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 7: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 60 inches, an approximate height of 55 feet, and a limb spread of 20 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) • • Page 3 June 10, 1996 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Greenburg Site Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan Tree Number 8: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 8 inches, an approximate height of 30 feet, and a limb spread of 10 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 9: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 14 inches, an approximate height of 45 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 10: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 26 inches, an approximate height of 45 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 11: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 26 inches, an approximate height of 45 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Individual Tree Removal Inventory. There are 11 existing trees to be removed on this site. Three trees due to there location in the proposed roadway and parking areas and 8 which are dangerous to extremely dangerous. The 8 Lobardy - poplars have been infected with a disease for several years and are half or nearly dead and /or are severely root damaged or are decayed beyond repair. Further, there are very few trees that are more dangerous than a dead and /or dying Lombardy - poplar. . • Page 4 June 10, 1996 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Greenburg Site Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan Tree Removal Discussion. Tree removal should be completed in a careful manner so as not to damage any trees on the neighboring property. Any tree to be removed within 15 feet of a tree to be preserved should have the stump ground out rather than excavated. Mitigation Discussion. There are no trees on this site which will survive the forthcoming construction trauma. Further, because of the location there is not enough room to plant replacment trees. Therefore, this project falls into the following catagory: "Chapter 18.150 ", "Tree Removal" by the "City of Tigard" "Section 18.150.025 Tree Plan Requirement" "Number 2 Standard a" and falls under "Section 18.150.070.D and E ". It is my understanding per Code Section 18.150.070, E, that a monetary compensation may be made in lieu of tree replacement. Summary. The new mitigation codes appear to have some flexibility in regards to replacement and compensation. However, the overall intent is clearly stated. Please call if you have any questions. I will be available upon your request to review these conclusions as necessary. ....f Sincerel / e W Davi Halstead B.S. C.A. • KOLL THE REAL ESTATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES SERVICES COMPANY Mark Roberts Associate Planner City of Tigard Community Development Dept. 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION: Requesting Conditional Use approval to construct a cellular radio communication facility consisting of a one - hundred thirty foot monopole structure and associated antenna. Requesting a variance to the requirement for paved access to the site. PROCEDURE TYPE: Quasi - Judicial PROJECT ADDRESS/DESCRIPTION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway /Tigard Veterinary Clinic /Assessor Map/Lot #: 1 S 1 36CC 2100 ZONING /COMP. PLAN: General Commercial (CG) APPLICANT/REP: Western PCS Corporation, 7535 -B NE Ambassador Place, Portland, Oregon. Michael Birndorf/ Koll Telecommunication Services (284 - 8714). PROPERTY OWNER(S): Hans and Marilyn Grunbaum 75358 N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -8714 FAX (503) 288 -5741 • • • 211744 SW Pacific Highway Conditional UseNariance BACKGROUND The Western PCS Corporation is in the process of establishing a new cellular phone system in the Portland Metropolitan area. In March of 1995, the Western PCS Corporation purchased six licenses from the Federal Communication Commission, including one for the Portland Metropolitan area. These licenses allow Western PCS to operate a new cellular telephone system called Personal Communication Services (PCS). PCS uses new digital technology to produce a higher quality transfer of voices and data than the older analog/digital hybrid systems that are currently being used by local cellular companies. PCS cellular technology is the ideal way to accommodate increased communication traffic in a wireless fashion. The public benefit of Personal Communication Services is tangible and extensive. Coverage for emergency service providers, i.e., police, fire and rescue will be positively impacted by decreasing response time to a reported emergency. This network of augmented telecommunications can provide the transmittal of crucial information (such as floor plans) to portable emergency fax machines while responders are en route to a scene. In addition, such services can take the place of a vehicle trip, thereby reducing traffic and the accompanying consumption of resources. EXISTING CONDITIONS The proposed cellular site is located at 11744 SW Pacific Highway in Tigard. The approximately .36 acre subject property is partially developed with the Tigard Veterinary Clinic. The site abuts a freeway on -ramp to Highway 217 to the south and west. Costco wholesale store borders the property to the east. The proposed facility will be located in the undeveloped southern portion of the subject property. The site will be accessed from a proposed gravel access path. See attached site plans. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Approximately 2200 square feet of the subject property will be leased for the proposed facility. This lease area will include a one - hundred thirty foot monopole outfitted at the top with three sector -style panel antenna arrays. Each array will be mounted vertically on one of three support beams. Each support beam extends approximately two feet from the sides of the free - standing monopole. Each of these arrays contain three panel -style antennas (for a total of nine antennas) approximately four feet high, six inches wide, and two inches deep. There may also be one small microwave dish, measuring approximately four feet in diameter, attached to the monopole. There will also be four steel equipment cabinets mounted on a concrete pad next to the monopole structure. These cabinets will be four feet tall, and occupy a space ten feet long by twenty -six inches wide. The cabinets are self - contained and are "all- weather "; therefore, no building is needed to house them. The monopole structure and equipment will be surrounded by a six foot high view obscuring chain link fence. • • • 311744 SW Pacific Highway Conditional UseNariance The monopole and foundation are designed to accommodate the antenna arrays of two wireless telephone carriers. Therefore, in the future, an additional carrier will be able to k. locate on the proposed facility without the need to construct a separate new tower. FINDINGS Section 18.70 (Development Standards) The proposed facility is a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District and meets all applicable development standards. There is no minimum lot size requirement for the zone. The code requires an average minimum lot width of fifty feet. The average minimum lot width of the subject property is between 65 and 70 feet. There are no yard requirements, except 50 feet from the centerline of Pacific Highway. The site is located in excess of 300 feet from the centerline of Pacific Highway. The maximum height of habitable structures is 45 feet. Section 18.98 provides an exemption from height limits for all non - habitable structures. The minimum landscaping requirement of the site shall be fifteen percent. The lease area will include new landscaping in excess of fifteen percent of the total lease area. See attached landscaping plan. The lease area is surrounded by existing mature vegetation, which will further aid in screening the structure. Existing vegetation within the lease area will have to be removed. See attached arborist report. The applicant will mitigate lost vegetation by paying into a City fund. Section 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) This section does not require specific land use buffers between a utility use and the existing surrounding commercial uses. However, the facility will be surrounded by a view - obscuring fence. This will provide screening of the electronic equipment. Section 18.102 (Visual Clearance) This section requires that a visual clearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right -of -ways. The lease are is not at the intersection of any right - of -ways or driveways. Section 18.106 (Parking) This section does not specify a specific parking ratio for this type of utility uses. • • 411744 SW Pacific Highway Conditional UseNariance Section 18.106 (Bicycle Facilities) t. This section is not applicable because the proposed facility is unmanned. Section 18.108.080 (Vehicular Access) The proposed lease area will be accessed via a proposed gravel access path. The applicant is requesting a variance to the requirement that the access be paved. The proposed access path will meet all fire district requirements. This is discussed below. This section does not provide a minimum driveway width standard for driveway access to utility facilities. The proposed lease area entrance will be a minimum width of twelve feet. Section 18.108 (Pedestrian Circulation) This is not applicable. Section 18.120.180. A.4 (a -b) (Screening From Adjoining Properties) The proposed facility equipment area will be screened from all adjoining properties by a combination of landscaping and a view - obscuring fence. Section 18.120.040 (Conditional Use Permits) The proposed facility complies with all applicable development standards for the district and use and is compatible with the freeway - commercial character of the area. There are no adjacent residential properties. The transmitter /antenna site does not contain any equipment that creates odors, vibrations or heat and glare. The facility is designed to have the least intrusive visual impact possible on the surrounding environment. Similar to a light post, the proposed monopole has a galvanized finish and does not employ the use of guy wires. Visual impacts will also be mitigated by proposed landscaping and screening and the existence of mature vegetation surrounding the site. Public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the site. The facility does not generate any drainage or waste - water. This is an un- manned facility. The only traffic to the site will be a monthly visit by a service technician to insure that the equipment is functioning properly. Telephone service and power are readily available in close proximity to the site. • • 511744 SW Pacific Highway Conditional UseNariance The property is of sufficient size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. The facility will occupy a small underutilized corner portion of the subject property. The topography at the proposed monopole /equipment location is flat. Only minor grading will occur to build a small retaining wall and allow access to the facility. 18.134 Variance The applicant is requesting a variance to the paved access requirement to the site. The proposed access will include a fifteen foot wide gravel access path, one - hundred fifty feet in length, designed to meet fire district requirements. Because the facility is unmanned, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue does not require that the access be paved. Granting this variance will not be injurious to property in the Planning District in which the property is located and it will not be materially detrimental to the purposes and goals of the Tigrad Municipal Code. The proposed facility complies with all applicable development standards (18.108.080). In addition, as mentioned above, public safety and welfare will not be jeopardized by granting this variance. The proposed use is not a typical commercial or industrial use that creates the need for a paved access road. The proposed facility is unmanned. There will be no traffic to the site except monthly service inspections. These inspections will be conducted by one individual utilizing a small service vehicle. The cost of paving the access road will create an economic hardship to the applicant. Approximately 2250 square feet would have to be paved to accommodate a fifteen foot wide access road serving the site. This would generate between $13,000- $16,000 in additional costs to the applicant (estimated cost of laying asphalt $6 -$7 per square foot (3 inch layer)). Using a gravel surface produces fewer negative site development impacts, compared to paving. Paved surfaces prevent water from percolating into the ground, thereby increasing storm -water run -off Water catch basins have to be constructed to accommodate this run -off Paving also requires that a larger area by disturbed for construction of the underlying base. Further disturbance results from the need to bring in heavy paving equipment. In summary, allowing a gravel access road produces fewer negative site development impacts, compared to paving. PLANTING LIST OUA74111V BOTANICAL NUE COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION REMARKS 0 OSMINTMIS OELAVATI OCLAVAI 091A147H05 2 CAL C17•IIAINER PER SPWG AR010SAPHYLOS UVA -Ip51 VIIA1IAIHNICH A POT OUIIAINCR Ip' CC TRIANGULAR SPACING NOTE: MINIMA/ 5 NEN IMPORTED 1CPSOII SMALL BC RACED IN ALL PLANTING ARCAS AFTER RANTING SPREAD A' OF ML514100A CCIPOST OVER ALL RANTING IDS PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 7/10. - rd ► ► western WPcs core lo75 NE REINGT COR R_ SLIE 9 PORTLAND. OREGON 97220 NOTE 000) 213a-2255 Fs (5073 79.-a07 = @ia Y>o Rw /• AMMO, R MEM UMW 1 AraIImIIMAI loot stuffs I I OREENBURO Ius aro PO-WI-8 1R mum= 11744 A ROM III WARE G ECON 9722. I Nan TUUE PLANTING PLAN I OQ1 119I L -1 Bar SCMC r - CI • Y V wester 1 1 Ipcs core .��s+ 73S5 NE wI6R540GR R.. SURE B ss _ - did MOM RSITM _o_N.�,eN. U& _ -_ =Y1L7g • PORTLAND. OREGON 97220 .Now w _ �°" - � Esc r521 7N-6/@ , §)@a f RAM pr ... .1.. 1 Il ''.//::7:77 . I 9' the”.":::::‘:;.'r • e:e� I S =� 0 -r.. .: •J4. ■PB nwmnnartn.R k • _ `mow _ ei =• 4 TYPICAL SRE SECTION ® i i I ' scan lie - r-e ' ,. - 9 -4 e Mal _ vc =- s.. ar�w.. —� '\ I I I S. I N \ r N L` Al an "111.1* t'irMaR ' ' .‘ \ Ili 1 s. T I i 'C� \mil � •�� / J _r 1 I I I '- OF MEW. — — J I QEENBUR0 WREN I Ng Now. au RR rii 6°a r _ PO48714 • do app, i 1: �,a I I s ue: }( . TIM" �� on as I..,..ii :'.: a aB roc MI :;',...5 -- `, r -- �. a L- f-.::: -> M � _•__ i+i+I- NMI Otmr AL1 N. Ru s.0 ' I w u I N ts... i ` ENTERGOR ELEVATIONS. v i ENLARGED SITE PLAN SEE SECTION I sow awn I A -1 SOUTH ELEVATION sr... ,m • r - 1 EAST ELEVATION :.. yr .. -e 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN v r , a I 4 S.I: , -'I r +cseow a.. ay. a:e,:v a• o �o:.c.ov�..cs II : 1 �����.Ii I —Je+ gitilliiiiiiliggpl t vzi*"'" d § §a i a a w e* as �__ c il • • s . ,......4.1.1 , 4\* .....0* . t \ aft _, .r 40....i's 9 I , \ ‘ * ', _ i i x .., • -----. it . , . , --PL. . ek ----\/ (4 -), ., Ai v , . , , a a I a a I 1 I. ....i+ ::...... .. I I if \\ ii I I a§ I 2 I :. � l- \\ FNIVP1191i111/ RIP i 11411111141110 � pG�� ?` �1° � &&8A �� ��' R � § �q$ � q.p q � r d � � r d � 4 � a g p r xa . 3; ��� �g � j�� A l V7� g R Rg � . �' � g¢ IN � i�� ° aq €€ ■ i a t9 gi E Q 4 6 4 6 8 �9_ Asi � gtf E 1�da i10 3 I `1;1146g � d•tadB1 ; I IIIiig 5 t q,4.Alf iggp Rek Fill I [ i IhIiIIII 46•'10" ¢ q .. ! 9 Q ■ P 6 °A 3 I-I ! p 8 i 0 i):.' 4 QM sj i 9aa .9 9 1411 pA 8 ! i I IIIlIIIII I I I IIILt i l 41 S §I6 8 8 9 7Y�R 8 r Y .o.n. t 9 E A ,iQ 8 -, �Q� - q q! b a 8s $9 1 '�1Y v 4' q • :. l C p4 ^!�' .;. g id l q b R ; e l3 qa b gx; , dg d r'�j ., 9q RA i q I 2 1V 9 ! §F 1 8 .. q d p d ;ilio: Ili _. L i ra rar a i I ow: li .61i i • R i s l. -1 1 + . 0 1 4 9\ �d; i i!le E e A., Milli i 11 i rad Yi 8 :� 8 I d 1n t . 1 0 :. :•C , $a I. i 10 m aI� M • 11115011 1 h ill :IA il Y _ r _ r i i `, N .. ' - • • , _ • I . ..---.... .- . TV western A A AKE; CorP : ----• Nr4riff , P0 LAN M D, Cs'aP OREGOZ • ' -- ' 0 . .. ' • ';'./j III i Cl -- -, - ---- AI 1 7 I VA% 7.' a? 21: - vs' Or' . _ ._ - • toe - , f,- , • i, ' , . - - .---- ■4 0 .'-: 1.: allf-:-.:;;,. i \ \ 7 . , .. F) g=a , . _ ... A s T o.,,,_. 42 _ \ \ //-.., ..- ■1, 4 1 a / ' - , i mir . CAME AS 110110 D 1 MCI RAPID IS MIIKIIIIII IIC . ellk ..., MI a IIIIM.11=11■•■ NM= . . "-. .. -.-. . - _ ii , _ • western _ • P ,i, • i - .._ _ - • . -' . . / -.. soon I - - Sk,i ‘ ,....- _ C=IIII=1i - ••••1: ' - C - 1; :' :''.;::. pcs corp * K. ..,.. ... , , .., EZIZM 0.10 WOW (MOM -----__ _ -• . . 7 77:71 :. . . I '.• IIM /111■1 , ..... . ' /---":"' s --'",---- .,..,• , t.,,„„,, - , s , a A NM / . / ' ''. ' - '' ..- ffro 7 / _ ... i■ INI 1r: a II.. - r • - - 0 \ \ 4 .1 - N EiNF#9. , , 1 IIITE NAME , ' - \4111 ' 41111- " I :;$•• • • GREENBURG ,...5„....6 (L) IT IAt u al li gN i _' ..11 - .54 1 1 .-....... 111° li ' En n rZ "a' • . . \ ;i. f l - Wh 111 M no3nOntn s. aux IMEEIEWA IIMII F AsI \ ..V • . • -AN .,, 1.0•1014 WU '' ....?..:':•Ves41/111111 "WSM sin NUMBER - \ -Ail ••-trp LEM An. - II \ I \ \\ ..-i ' ON*. \ ' K -,,-)-. , li■ Si ir • • :e.,;--41 LPIOSDANG 3 .E... SEE , \ t 0, -.", '---- --/ i i '.. PO-1373-B , 7. 2 10111i 6 MP= 21 IV MM. 1111E 111016 PO 0 El) lik: ‘, LI ,-'" , ,41 11001163. 10 MING 110 MP. ‘11. --. • J 111, SITE PLAN SME: r . 30. ENLARGED SITE PLAN / GRADING PLAN sum i• • ux _ 41110 1 'i wr- E .. F. -: -. 6- r E7- I am= •POIIIICTS IIN 1.10 DAMS MP .2.13113 r . I =ANL IMAM& I ZUM LIEBEElt I so ma I row no room ot. LAMM .0 Z iiEffire F. =, k E. 19313.11, 0.1310. MP 10 . AMMO/ 517.1‘3=151 MIL a Or711 *'3 71 , 1 ''' 0...' ir EL- L. Fg. '•• .. r Eu- ;It; gre---: :I 1170 IP 1. M 713 WI RM. WP Pm WM PP 1•401 MAW Ir. P PRIM 11. .3... .3. GIREENBURC3I . ..., k G F arm 0310.0. WU G. 101.010 i .... - /MGM 30113 MOM PM so 310107 TOR 1 Pt a. - p 6 rer = • SIMMS PrOVA 51 . I .157CPW P CS COPPC001111 MS NI .100MODP .Ct. SLIM 9 S-1 10000 C 11.0 I SW POW 1 MI ••••0 T. zi =Pm WO 0.41S /WO Waists g KAMM, 0.010 117720 I ig rm =a• .. ff.... 111211 SAl CONOEIT PR. .001.0. OPELOP P. P0-11178-13 I. T.' lig 239 1 , 11 1111 1 eN.STE MILIZSISIMN; 1 MI Pawn T. I r ; room own nunornarr 4orsconsnaso Is r E1'"' SHEET INDEX E - 5. Re' : COCK, OOP MN SISIMIREUE 4 ' . - we • MO 1113. 0 MO@ YIP I040.0 1..1•0110 ,..3.• -7.-- -".---- r -1•7- 11714 SI NOM MA WAX OFf.GON MD a- illE if ' NM. ' ..... - P.13 310 100II *9 %, I i Won I 2cialata-MIn .7. SI.rte 00 ... .111.1 IMMO F Er ...., o.n.o. OP.. P730 ‘ 2 2.... I... 7110 001 zrn MEW. WPM ea 1 nom not I E MIL.. : •••••• ..... ...: (ow SJ.1.00,3 AL 00113 $110 1/30510.1100 ..... Ilk Alliktf• 10 LM) =MO ISIER•10I MM. 01 3.73.0. 1 ITLE SHEET COMM 4.113 P. MOROI PL. 1113 OM 120-00 PM IS1311 A IMP M ..... -I.- OVERALL SITE PLAN mutractuaralte VICINITY AMP no unworn nnun 011f, PO IESP.E 7117 00 0,077 IR 11.4.(g• - mg- GENRA INF G an . . MI B WILD oo 13t I0.13010. EKKEPPIG IONIC 31. E L O - - .1-I IP SOMALI VI IML TITA• ..1... 2211M4L 0701.0.9 (D- ow WARM <4, 4 ova worm *Ft t..C.1.40 -m- 04121 .103 - 7. 111M0C IS 01•00 -.7- I .11 I 3. .13 00.1" .0703/10 Igi) mono oremo - Me 4 NUT lin Irpqinc 1. .07 3. a ms., r■ ,l1 ru 71, ABBREVIATIONS & SYMBOLS _ CONSULTANT TEAM _ viciNrrr MAP V. %..rrs , - Z.Zs!' PROJECT SUMMARY _ APPROVALS _ T-1 • • CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON - RESIDENTIAL DATE: 1„ STAFF: L !, APPLICANT: Kd 11 J Q (e cow im uttlr 1 /d Lis 5er L?ICCAGENT: " lc ne Phone: ( 1 Phone: ( ) 2'E51 — 27/Y- PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS: 10 7 L i c t j 1 6f /14 k/C41 War 4 TAX MAPITAX LOT: S 3 ‘ CL 'faX !m4 iie'G' J l � NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): O PIQ ) � ka u$ Pev'144 W— ( aNCe. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: To A eval 7 , a 1 30 cod_ vtiamopel. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ( 4 / o ti4 0+.e/de I C C- G> ZONING DESIGNATION: 6-Q e CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT -5 FACILITATOR: 1--- ��� TEAM AREA: PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS / / /// `/ For 1444- 4d4 Q �kvq Minimum lot size: if sq. ft. verage lot width: ft. Maximum buildi g height: 9 ft. Setbacks: front /r /it ft. side 1 Q ft. rear K 44 ft. corner 4 ft. from street. Maxim m site coverage: �s % Minimum land c� a ed or natural v / g p egetat on area: S % (Refer to Code Section 18. 62.650 ) • CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON•Residenti.I arolicationlPlanning Department Section • • • ADDITIONAL LOT DIMEN NAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum lot fron ge: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as pa of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wid access easement. The depth of all lots sh I not exceed 2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 times the minimum to size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Cod Section 18.1 .060 Lots) SPECIAL SETBACKS i l • Streets: 5� feet from the centerline of 54.0 D°a cA_ (1l 1(C4 _ > Established areas: feet from Lower intensity zones: at feet, along the site's boundary. • Flag lot: 10 foot side yard setback. ,V4 (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) • SPECIAL BUILDING IGHT PROVISIONS : il. i • it . _ • • • n - Buildings located in a non - residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: 9 A ma • urn building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; 9 All actu. building setbacks will be at least 1 /2 (half) of the building's height; and 7 The struct• re will not abut a residential zone district. (Refer to Code Section ; .98.020) • PARKING AND ACCESS • Required parking for this type of use: no ki?, Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): tie Secondary use required parking: t? Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Li 4 No more than 40% of required spaces may be designated and /or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be • imensioned as follows: :- Standard • .rking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. • Compact pa ing space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. - (Refer to Code Section 18.1 • •.020) Handicapped park g: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be • rovided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Di abilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking spa. - symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be p• -ted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 NON- Residential application;Planning Department Section • • Bicycle racks a required for multi - family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located . areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces sha be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. -r ., 1/ Minimum number of accesses: 1 4 6 " 410) "`'I'+ar inimum access width: Minimum pavement width: ) A 1 wl,t�fm ' q, � CD ;s - .s LAJWf 1"i re Ole L ?c All driveways and parking are s, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be paved. • Drive -in use queuing areas: h l . (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) WALKWAY REQUIRE ENTS Walkways shall tend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevator of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access d egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi - building com rcial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed be een a new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.10 .050) LOADING AREA REQ EMENTS . Every commercial r industrial building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The s ace size and location shall be as approved by the City Engineer. . (Refer to Code Section 1 . 06.070 -090) CLEAR VISION AR A The City req fires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road /driveway, road /railroad, and road /road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon t e abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Se ion 18.102) BUFFERING AND SCREENING In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100) CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 NON•Residential aochcationiPlanninc Oeoartment Section • • The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. alon north boundary. ft. alon ast boundary. ft. along uth boundary. ft. along w t boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right -of -way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree or every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to prow e a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which ffectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of la scaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) SIGNS Sign permi must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits \ .\\ out is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards mapermitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18. • SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100 -year floodplain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre - application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely i•-• 'f -ii • 'v- .. as - • a - it •• g o. - - - •• i•'I' •if h- ...I' • 1 1 - - t • • - s - i • • - 1 . .v- 1 . • !! • - . •' . -• ., . - .!11111 •• (- development application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 8 NON-Residential aot Department Section • • • Chapter 18.84 also provides regulations for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. In most cases, dedication of 100 - year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. (Refer to Code Section 18.84) REE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the following: Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: > Retainage of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; > Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires 18.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; • Retainage of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. ' efer to Code Section 18.150.025) CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON•Residential anticattonIPlannun Deaartment Section • • • ITIGATION Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director* shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located , on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. 7 The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacem�ent. Li a. 0.6e 1 sf v . ra s vei uL aJ LA Q- t r.c¢s t ti Qkz - o P- 12 f Q' (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) � 1 ( O veuvu NARRATIVE The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS _ 18.80 _ 18.92 " 18.100 _ 18.108 � �.120 1 . - 1 - E - 3 - . - 1 - 50 18.84 ;8-.96 .102 _ 18-.114 ✓ 18 30 _ 18 :160 • 18.88 _ 18.98 1/ 18.106 _ 18.116 18.134 +62 1 18.164 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 -feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 8 NON•Residential acolicationIPtanning Department Section • • RECYCLI Applies - should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Di •osal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625 -6177. (Refer to Co. - Section 18.116) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: n e ifVevsorts aA a offr ieat Gtas bPtt irP ? lel *6 s.ev�v2 - o th er - 0.40 A 12 siTR, 5. apt ✓' Va vie ` I f 1 Pc QYfoh 5 6 JiSc5 Lintz) 'hie . .Jo< ti O f L--- e i 51f1 I ''u 1 A:IJQ 144et4 14 IM a \'t w Qei 1 a oJ , ' u.'2- S / -.� l'41 of 6vA GO rat 517/tS/ el . 1k j Go s. assocf WWI w)1 dfrJvzJ s trau be revleati Z A *It vt c y- vas I i ve_ 44h-q.5" Co es a Va r 1 Q K ce . ,..1 PROCEDURE Administrative Staff Review. ✓ Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. _ Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall beheld by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accented after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4 :30 on other days. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON•Residential aool+cation:Plannino Department Section • . Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch • by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard 017 4 eicNc1/ . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planning Division upon request. This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre - application conference(s) is/are required if an application(s) is,are to be submitted more than six months following this pre - application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: ' Hegi4 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNI G DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639 -4171 FAX: (503) 684 -7297 n: Uogm.patty +masters ; preaop -c.mst (cngmeenng Sec:ion: masters!oreano- c.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON•Residential applicanonlPiannmp Department Section • • • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT , APPLICATION CHECKLIST ' CITY TIGARD OF TIOARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639 -4171. Staff: 1M Date: `APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ MAR ED ITEMS II A) Application form (1 copy) u B) Owner's signature/written authorization C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed d� D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies B Filing Fee $ '3 !_< I l SITE - SPECIFIC MAP(SUPLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS �I A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 1. Vicinity map 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0 -10% or 5 ft for grades > 10 %) c• 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: (a) Wildlife habitats 0 (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" _ caliper measured 4 feet from ground level 0 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location and type of on and off -site noise sources 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11. Location of existing dedicated right -of- ways !✓ LNNO LSE APPLICATION / LIST PAGE 1 OF 5 • • B) Site Development Plan Indicating: No. of Copies 2- • 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ❑ . (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation a (e) Outdoor common areas • (f) Above ground utilities 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions 0 / 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ 8. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques ❑ 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ • 11. The location of all structures and their orientation a✓ 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Gradin • Plan In..catin • : No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis . awings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location an. extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General con •ur lines ❑ (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilizatio • proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate tim of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a regi ered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanita sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will .e mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION I LIST PACE 2 OF 5 - D) Architectural Draw. Indicating: 41 ,1o. of Copies 7 -6 - The site development plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor pla indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for se on -site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: - No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings --- 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces a 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials a 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions a (b) Erosion control measures that will be used a • F) Sign Dra gs: a Sign drawin shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code as art of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Permi o construct a sign. G) Traffic Genera on Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary ' : rtition /Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma. Indicatin•: No. of Copies 1. The owner . the subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's thorized agent ❑ 3. The map scale 0,50,100 or 200 feet-1) inch north arrow and date a 4. Description of p. cel location and boundaries ❑ 5. Location, width a • names of streets, easements and other public ways within and a••.cent to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all perma buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of a water courses ❑ 3. Location cf any trees with 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities an• utility easements ❑ 11. For major land partition which c ates a public street: (a) The proposed right -of -way lo .tion and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross - section of the p •osed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not prec de efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND LSE APPLICkTION / LIST PACE 3 OF 3 • I) Subdivision ' elimin• Plat Mao and Data Indicating: •o. of Copies 1. Scale equa 'rig 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one phase per s -et ❑ 2. The propose• name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map s 'owing property's relationship to arterial and collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresse and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveye and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of applicatio ❑ 6. Boundary lines of t :ct to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent s, bdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of u - subdivided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a City - established benchmark at 2 -foot intervals for 0 -10% grades great= than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, pe and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the propos- • subdivision): (a) Public and private r .:ht -of -ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sa itary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water main • including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephon. transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservations for pa ks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances ❑ 10. Approximate plan and profiles o proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes Indic• ed on the plans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed water distrib tion system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hyd - nts ❑ • 12. Approximate centerline profiles sho ing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reas•nable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed stree _ right -of- way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inun or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow of al water courses & drainage -ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, approxi ate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used fo purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. [? 17. The location of all trees with a diameter 6 in es or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of • roposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a state ■ent of which structures are to remain after platting ❑ 19. Supplemental information including: - (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership ❑ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improve ents ❑ 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetlands & .rsh areas ❑ 21. . If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably be sho on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrative and s bmitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION / LIST ?AGE 4 OF S • • • • J) Solar Access (c ulations: ❑ K) Other Information No. of Copies ❑ h :'login ist. Tst .b1av 23. 1995 LAND LSE APPUCATION / UST PAGE 3 OF 5 i, , j i Mi L 1 — 3 (—_[1][----7=H — FLE _._________ Q 1 S136CC -00100 , 1S136CD -01000 At. S136CD-0100 CD i 0 8 Vv 1S1 •4,... 0) 1 02b 00 II A s 7 1S136CD 02200 ■ mimm C C Co p 2S101 BB -01201 CO 0) P O ;,N PL G 0 ._ ti`s Cr Vicinity Map A CUP 96- 0006/VAR 96 -0010 Notification Map • FAX TRANSMITTAL fbe DATE: TO: Mary White, Legals (fax) 620 -3433 FROM: Patricia Lunsford, City of Tigard (Ph.) 639 -4171 PLACE UNDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO IN THE LEGALS SECTION The following will be considered by the Tigard Hearings Officer on Monday, . 1996 at 7:00 PM at Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. Both public, oral and written testimony is invited. The public hearing on this matter will be conducted in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code, and rules and procedures of the Hearings Officer. Failure to raise an issue in person or by letter accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the hearings authority and all parties to respond precludes an appeal, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Further information may be obtained from the Planning Division at 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 or by calling (503) 639 -4171. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006/VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 ➢ WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. TT PUBLISH DATE: ,1996 CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS • s CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER q BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006NARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 Case Name(s): WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Name of Owner: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum Name of Applicant: Western PCS Corporation Address of Applicant: 7535 B NE Ambassador Place City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97220 Address of Property: 11744 SW Pacific Highway City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).:WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100 Request: >The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. Zone: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Action: D ❑ Approval as requested © Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:' THE: DECISION SHALL::B IO E "FINAN::: : >':;:':!. >;:< :`: 996 :UNLES ; 1 '� APPEAL I :F _ ...::.:.:.: .. :..::.. ;:.....:.. AN .:::.. AP. E f;. .:. IS I . :..: LED . The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE:FOR: FILING<OF AN:APPEALIS 3:30 : M : ON >:;: < >• :;;:. 1:996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS • • CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: July 2. 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006/VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 ➢ WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. • _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • 0 provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): I CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS G tuP q i -- DOC4 RPUEST FOR COMMEN. • ,./,w Q - o ©e NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS ���t5 i r i i 14 0Tp te_, • CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS J l�(�� (circle one} _CIT Area: (W) (S) (E) (C) CO Placed for review in Library CIT Book 61;1 �/ CITY DEPARTMENTS _' BLDG. DEPT. /David Scott, moldin Official ICE DEPT. /Kelley Jennings. Carne Prevenronomca O RATIONS /John Acker. Mont. sow. _ CITY ADMIN. /Cathy Wheatley, GNRecaOa ;ZING. DEPT. /Brian Roger, Development Review Enamor COM.DEV. DEPT. /D.S.T.S ADV. PLNG. /Nadine Smith. Planning supereoi WATER DEPT. /Michael Miller, opaonmo Mai.,ope,plbns Md eo. SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ FIRE MARSHALL _ UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY ' TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell • SWM Program /Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa. County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton, OR 97075 (pick -up box) Hillsboro, OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA. CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. _ METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _ METRO - GREENSPACES 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. #I6, Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's /ZOA's) Hillsboro. OR 97124 Portland. OR 97232 -2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland. OR 97232 -2736 _ Brent Curtis (CPA's) _ STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _ Jim Tice (IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ METRO _ Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Mary Weber _Scott King (CPA's) Portland. OR 97225 -0412 600 NE Grand Avenue _ Tom Harry (Current Planning App's) Portland. OR 97232 -2736 Lynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) _ OREGON DLCD (CPA's /ZOA's) 1.// 1 175 Court Street, N.E. ODOT /REGION 1 _ CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem. OR 97310-0590 Laurie Nicholson/Trans. Planning Larry Conrad. Senior Planner 123 N.W. Flanders PO Box 4755 _ CITY OF PORTLAND Portland, OR 97209 -4037 1 120 SW 5th _ CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland. OR 97204 _ OD OT /REGION 1. DISTRICT 2 -A Mike Matteucci, Neighborhood Coordinator Bob Schmidt /Engineering Coord. PO Box 4755 _ CITY.OF DURHAM 2131 SW Scholls /PO Box 25412 Beaverton, OR 97076 Planning Director Portland, OR 97225 Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _ CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard. OR 97281 -3483 City Manager PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 _ <POTHER% Lake Oswego. OR 97034 _ CITY OF KING CITY City Manager 15300 SW 116th King City, OR 97224 SPECIAL AGENCIES _ GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _ PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _ COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Elaine Self. Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard. OR 97281 -3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton, OR 97005 _ NW NATURAL GAS CO. Phone: (5031 721.2441 _ METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _ TRI -MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer fm: (5031721.2502 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox. Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland. OR 97209 -3991 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Portland, OR 97232 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 — TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _ SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Clifford C. Cabe, Const. Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 5424 SE McLoughlin Portland, OR 97201 Portland. OR 97204 Portland. OR 97202 STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES _ AERONAUTICS DIVISION (ODOT) _ DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _ US POSTAL SERVICE _ COMMERCE DEPT. -M.H. PARK _ FISH & WILDLIFE Randy Hammock. Growth Cord. _ PUC _ DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station _ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY _ U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS Portland, OR 97229 -9998 _OTHER n:\wavn \pony \movon\ncnorc.mi1 RECEIVED PLANNING .. • AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE MAY 2 9 1996 • WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: . . . : .Planning Dlvisi�n ;: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 . I , '- li' 'Se in •r g i-% , do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed 13o rnc$,,opo /Q- affecting the land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and /or tax lot(s) currently registered) 117yH SV4 PAc.(Fa - Am" , OE '722.3 , and did on the 21' day of MA^{ 19 a( personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a cond, 1'0,m ( JSQ- application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. . The sign was posted at - nil_ u r n c.1TY • ?oLE. F t ,iz - s T N o 1 I'H cAT flat - r'1-ft ?9.o 97wArY (state location you posted notice on property) Sign re n rese ce of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the Z of IVCCA-% , 19%. i dilLt / 44/4 , " ` C' No RY PUB OF OREGON to ommissio' • ' ,:, � ; My Commission Expires: (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) ftAN E OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: rrt *' - S Ga. .gpz TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: C N us . Name of ApplicandOwner: P.RRrro t✓ • Address or General Location of Subject Property: 1 7y Siwl 4r,rPrc Mvy L Subject Property Tae Map(s) and Lot #(s): f SJ :1gfQC -C 21 00 n:Uoginipattyirrastersiaf post.mst • RECEIVED PLANNING AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING MAY 29 1956 STATE OF OREGON ) • ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Itcr.i , being duly sworn, depose and say that on rIq 22 , 19 I caused to have mailed to each of. the persons on the attached. list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) ► I 7Yy SW ?Act Fl 41 f tan / O- 2 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post � Office located at 7 (o tJEr A Q eocr ( A),4 f -P� with postage prepaid thereon. • • .„ Si,i n. - �\,n - p resen.- .t a otary Public) • • (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) • • Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the Z day of R , 19/. 1 OFFICIAL SEAL - LJ LL.4.L.JA l z R'OT'ARY PU;_LIGOREGO➢V � I MY COMMISCION EX : rDFC CE ER 3 No RY PUBLI OF OREGON III My Commission Expires: I 4 (Applicant. please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: SrT& vt 1173 A arzircw TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: eo,.rprn,nl,v (Is& • Name of Applicant/Owner.. CAAtna PCS ott onQ.4aj -zo.J . Address or General Location of Subject Property: 1 CPP1 3 W ?Ac.1 Fic- L Subject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot T(s): 15 13I 21 00 J h:Uoginbattyk Writers arrmaiI.rust • • .... • Imo. City of Tigard, Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF AMENDED PUBLIC HEARING ( 0) L HEARIN FOR: (Chock box lbw" w •vc.br.) (check appropriate box below) - (Enter Public Hearing Date above) O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission Et/ Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) DECISION FOR: (a.r.reo..e•..r.pp or City of Tigard Planning Director I ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) FINAL ORDER FOR: ' I (acct box abovo.11 soot -"o) (Check appropriate box below) O City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION /NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which i. al ached, marked Exhibit "A ", was A pailed to each ed pre on(s) at the addres shown on the attached list , marked Exhibit " :" •n the y of 1994' , and deposited in the Unit- : States ail on j, ■ , 'ay . , ! 1991 , postage prepaid. jz1 I - P = ed Notice r �t Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the day of I � V 19/ OFFICIAL SEAL e DIANE M JELDERKS !I / NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON ,1, COMMISSION NO. 046142 i I t � MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 NOT RY PUBLIC OF • " EG ' My Commission Expir: q i � G-iFILE ies / / ,EG - NAME(S): `'Iii ^G� / / tin " w CASE NO.(S): * -oc4 ` 94 e /Q TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: • ,I • mT A - CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, AUGUST 26. 1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0006 VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 =ILE TITLE: WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum 7535 B NE Ambassador Place 21390 SW Edy Road • Portland, OR 97220 Sherwood, OR 97140 REQUEST: > The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 8/26196 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO. PRESENT W° EN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROP ED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING. PRIOR TO OR AF THE PUB EARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MA PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION QN THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER AUGUST 5, 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE —NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY —FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY —FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. Ina ■ Vi x/111 el II 1 = Ri pima a 7,- . - wow _ = - •i.6�::i g r� • Ma — —__— _____am_■ N an B _ ■tea ma k .,_ . au ri iiii LI. u: gi ... �% VP II i .,11.... 1rr tui ! rt. oi • SKI ,„ pp 1011 PARCEL -» • WI � 4 0 * ° . All■ � } z • . p , � %. CUP 96- 0006NAR 96-0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 8/26/96 HEARINGS OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING Lu p q ocap/ V tic cl(, - 0310 13e5-r'rl PCS rtita n p 1 . e, 410 �X�� ►j 1S136CC-00100 1S136CD-01001 BAPASCH, STEPHEN CHEVRON U S A INC BY WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE 575 MARKET ST RM 1834 GENERAL MOTORS CORP SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94105 485r MILWAUKEE AVE DETROIT,MI 48202 2S101 BB -01201 1 S136CD -02200 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION COSTCO WHOLESALE CO�P.BRPCfION ATTN: EXCISE TAX DEPT 111 ATTN: EXCISE T 111 PO BOX 97077 PO B 77 KIRKLAND,WA 98083 KLAND,WA 98083 1S136CC -02100 1S136CC -02000 GRUNBAUM, HANS H AND MARILYN K GRUNBAUM, HANS H AND MARILY TRUSTEES TRUSTEES 21390 SW EDY RD 21390 D SHERWOOD,OR 97140 S RWOOD,OR 97140 1S136CD -01000 MONAGHAN FARMS, INC WESTERN PCS CORPORATION 14120 EAST EVANS AVE 7535 B NE AMBASSADOR PLACE AURORA,CO 80014 PORTLAND OR 97220 • To the north the site idjoined by a frontage road that ppides access to the property . from SW Pacific Highway and is part of the State Highway right - - way. To the west of this parcel is Highway 217. To the south and east the property is adjoined by the Costco Store. • Site Information and Proposal Description; The northerly portion of the site is presently developed with a Veterinary Clinic. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit Approval to develop a 130 - foot cellular • communications tower facility and related equipment structures. A Variance to the type of material to be used for access to this facility has also been requested. The applicant has requested to use gravel instead of an asphalt or concrete pavement surface for the proposed driveway to the monopole facility. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 130 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities, as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the leasehold area that is proposed to be developed. The plan appears to provide in excess of the 15% minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface ratio within the leasehold area. Setback: Section 18.56.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. The site does not adjoin a residential zoning district and, therefore, complies with the setback standards of the General Commercial Zoning District. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non - residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height Although the existing Veterinary Clinic has existing STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 3 • • street trees, these trees alt ot in compliance with this standard tandard Sue to their spacing and the total property frontage. It is recommended that this section be found to be not applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non - conforming through the - development of a new cellular communications use This determination is consistent with the Non - Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C).' Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has not proposed to develop a parking lot in conjunction with this use, therefore, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway: A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 -foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 -foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off-Street Parkins: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant has not provided a parking lot to serve this development. Because there is no minimum parking ratio for this type of facility, no off - street parking has been provided. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 -feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet. This use does not require that parking spaces • be provided so two way access is also not needed to serve this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review any necessary revisions will be made to this plan to address fire vehicle access. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006/VAR 96-0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 4 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, .102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.'l'S4 18.150 and 18.164. The . proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered • by , the provisions of the previously, listed sec lions. These other . standards are __ _ _ addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related - to the provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.2 (Tree Removal) is reviewed elsewhere within this report under Section 18.150. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant has provided a mixture of screening and buffering materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 130 -foot height and its communications purpose, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. The monopole itself has not been designed to attract attention more so than other similar freeway interchange light standards. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings. Other existing trees within the adjoining State Highway right -of -ways are also expected to partially screen this facility. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 5 The use, as proposed, corn s with all site development standar� set forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing trees will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this ' - development as proposed.._ All applicable - standards of the zoning district are Met this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The location criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minimum of a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The .. - - . applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact • of the antenna. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request for a Variance. The applicant has requested a Variance from Section 18.106.050 (J) that requires all areas for vehicle maneuvering to be paved with an asphalt or concrete surface. The applicant has proposed to gravel the driveway that would provide access to the proposed monopole facility. A Variance to a development standard may be approved where the following findings can be made: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; Due to its limited nature, the proposed driveway pavement material Variance has not been found to be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title. The proposed Variance is also not in conflict with specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 6 2. There are l s e circumstances that exist whic re peculiar to the lot size, P P shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Due to the developed nature of much of the property width along the site's Public Street frontage, developing this facility towards the street would limit the future development of this property to provide access to a facility that rarely requires access. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The Variance is to a development standard and has not been proposed to allow a use that is not permitted in the General Commercial Zoning District. A Utility use is allowed under a Conditional Use Permit, as has been proposed. The Variance allows economic use of a smaller undeveloped portion of an existing commercially developed property. By allowing the Variance, future additional development of the property can take place without requiring reconstruction of a paved access driveway. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The variance allows the applicant to avoid constructing pavement of a driveway to serve a small portion of a partially developed commercial site. The nature of the variance is limited in nature such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by this change. The Variance will allow additional use of a partially developed commercial site without precluding additional, more intensive commercial land uses that are permitted within the General Commercial Zoning District. The Oregon Department of Transportation had no comment on the use of gravel in this instance. 5. The hardship is not self imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that site constraints such as the partially developed nature of the property, its size and shape, and the limited need for access of this proposed facility dictate its location. Construction of a gravel driveway of 15 feet in width allows emergency vehicle and monthly maintenance vehicle access to the facility and is, therefore, the minimum Variance necessary for this purpose. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a subdivision application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a site plan that identifies all existing trees greater than twelve inches in caliper. The applicant has proposed to remove all 11 trees within the area proposed to be developed with this use. Three of the 11 trees are located along the northerly portion of the site and were found to be healthy. The applicant shall review realignment of the proposed gravel driveway and the proposed fencing with the arborist in order to preserve these trees if possible. STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 7 • 110 Where it is not found to be possible to preserve these trees, a tree mitigation program shall be provided so that there is no net loss of caliper inches where less than 25 percent of the existing healthy trees are to be preserved. The plan shall mitigate the total number of caliper inches of healthy trees that are lost. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: 1. Retention of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; 2. Retention of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with 18.150.070.D; 3. Retention of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; 4. Retention of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: 1. A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. 2. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. 3. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 4. The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. 5. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. :...: ieu * :Oftree're under :; Sub -section: D:of:::thisection> a ma � with nt the:: conse of .::...: :.:.: � irector:: electao;com Ci for;its: costs m: erformin� such This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 8 • I •' ‘. . , • -Y4 i / pNW. • ' I I ` +. Z • - �� 0 i, z z z a J O. 0 Ce Q 0 p SY MIN moullb �� LL. MVO IMMO :, i,•F -ii . m � �. 4 ' z • s MIL w ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CASE NO. Western PCS EXHIBIT MAP UP 96 -0006 • Monopole VAR 96 -0010 • The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval ' have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the t. applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six feet in height. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation, Aeronautics Division reviewed this application and had the following comment: The proposed tower shall be lighted with a dual fitted red obstruction light mounted on top of the structure in accordance with Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 70/7460, Chapters 4, 5 and 13. The Oregon Department of Transportation, Engineering Division reviewed this application and had the following comment: No new access will be permitted to SW Pacific Highway West. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, for the new driveway to be constructed to the frontage road that provides access to SW Pacific Highway. The applicant shall pave a minimum of a 20 -foot paved driveway shall be constructed from the edge of the existing frontage road. No other comments or objections have been received. f August 19. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner ep/z p August 19. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard ewersdorff DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 9 ... . : i • i / . • • 1 • ao 4, 1y. /� i : - u�. Z � -: _ O / / 1 :: - :/',. / -- '..• : 1 /rill; - --- .. " ;,....' 2 4 ,.., , /.: > . . sr _tot c...p / wrnw aoa m wciAlitniV i� A ! .0... .a., n 1 -. \\\muiliIIN :vi It NO 0 •w 1ua aq ' 1 Z Q J Zr.:-.‘ a. Q L ■ 1 II . , =- 1 - .,, 4-,....„-... ... At ._/ ild mil$. � l imn � '�„` F-. „„ . _I_ • Il A'aria . ■ t ., ., , - Li_ 1 ,i1 at- - =... ,. in■ MI nom ®irii3Y rw� 1 ` • -- 0 ......... ,- I N . fir - ir rai N N I • . SITE PLAN I CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAD CesternPCSMonopole • UP 96 -0006 VAR 96 -0010 ---L, • 1 ;. ; Is 1 ..swomulum .1ft. am . ,, IR .. rarif — Al ail II 11 Al ii. gm 1 — i IMO Ill ;11111* ill 1111 .1 imi 1 . ..., .1 1.1 EN 1 I III 111111m a II 1 O • NEI 2 Alm 1.1 I= IN ..4 -1--• ' , .... . v .. . alp C 1 ■iirra :21...r.., ..., .11 `11111i: I 2 lig ll. mm e 0 ! t 1 i • la 111 mu IP Id III , Il k ' 41 111 ■1• 1111 1 1 10111 la lk. WIPP Atgi 8 ... r ■ • - 'I , , . P &* SUM 4014 1, ! ,_, ■•■ : 1 fit4 / . c ! c i , . ■ 0 , JO 1 s log 1 CZ 1 ; 1 clililL 1:E=8.CMT 1213- 1 1 14.8.1 I ,1 2 illior t PI, 1 0 { w i is t , • , i■ .#* . *g rollia*H , 1 , . Vicinity Map A 1 CUP 96-0006/VAR 96-0010 ,4 1 Note: Map is not to scale Western PCS Monopole i 1 EX II I 7 3 Western PCS Monopole - CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 Notice of Final Order by the Hearings Officer Western PCS Corporation 7535 B NE Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 Hans and Marilyn Grunbaum 21390 SW Edy Road Sherwood, OR 97140 0 • Agenda Item: • 0 Hearing Date: August 26. 1996 7:00 PM . :. .; :..STAFF REPORT < TO : THE CITY OF TIGARD FOR THE CITYOF TIGARD, OREGON SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0006 Variance VAR 96 -0010 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested. 1. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. 2. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to allow the use of a gravel surface as an access driveway to this facility. APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum 7535 B NE Ambassador Place 21390 SW Edy Road Portland, OR 97220 Sherwood, OR 97140 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lots 2000 and 2100. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Variance:will not adversely: affect the .health, safety and welfare of the City: :::Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL, subject.. the following recommended conditions of approval: STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: • (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Mark Roberts, Planning Diyi . .. n ' 'sio g :: .::. : :...::::. .: (503) . 639 - 4171) 1. The applicant shall provide lighting on the proposed tower with a dual fitted red obstruction light mounted on top of the structure in accordance with Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 708460, Chapters 4, 5 and 13. STAFF CONTACT: Thomas Highland, Aviation Planner, Oregon Department of Transportation. 2. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, for the new driveway to be constructed to the frontage road that provides access to SW Pacific Highway. The applicant shall construct a minimum of a 20 -foot paved driveway from the edge of the existing frontage road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Doherty, Oregon Department of Transportation. 3. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface to be constructed within the leasehold area. 4. The applicant shall review the option of realigning the proposed gravel driveway and the fencing with the arborist in order to preserve the three trees that have been found to be healthy. Where it is not found to be possible to preserve these trees, Section 18.150.070.D requires a mitigation program so that there is no net loss of caliper inches where a development proposal is to retain less than 25 percent of the existing trees. The plan shall mitigate the total number of caliper inches of healthy trees that are lost. . ;;;: THIS APPROVAL. SHALL BE VALID FOR 18: MONTHS : ':: ; THE: EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION, • SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is developed with an office building that is occupied by a veterinary clinic. Variance 88 -32 and Sign Code Exception 88 -05 concerning the height and size of a proposed sign and related structures were filed by the current property owner. The City has no record of any more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 2 To the north the site is adjoined by a frontage road that proves access to the property from SW Pacific Highway and is part of the State Highway right - - way. To the west of this parcel is Highway 217. To the south and east the property is adjoined by the Costco Store. Site Information and Proposal Description; The northerly portion of the site is presently developed with a Veterinary Clinic. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit Approval to develop a 130 -foot cellular • communications tower facility and related equipment structures. A Variance to the type of material to be used for access to this facility has also been requested. The applicant has requested to use gravel instead of an asphalt or concrete pavement surface for the proposed driveway to the monopole facility. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 130 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code • Section 18.62 lists utilities, as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the leasehold area that is proposed to be developed. The plan appears to provide in excess of the 15% minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface ratio within the leasehold area. Setback: Section 18.56.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district. The site does not adjoin a residential zoning district and, therefore, complies with the setback standards of the General Commercial Zoning District. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non - residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. Street Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height Although the existing Veterinary Clinic has existing STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 3 street trees, these trees a• of in compliance with this standar�ue to their spacing and the P P 9 total property frontage. It is recommended that this section be found to be not applicable to _ this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non - conforming through the development of a new cellular communications use. This determination is consistent with the Non - Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C). Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has not proposed to develop a parking lot in conjunction with this use, therefore, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 -foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 -foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant has not provided a parking lot to serve this development. Because there is no minimum parking ratio for this type of facility, no off- street parking has been provided. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 -feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet This use does not require that parking spaces • be provided so two way access is also not needed to serve this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review any necessary revisions will be made to this plan to address fire vehicle access. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0006NAR 96-0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 4 ` - • • 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. _ _ These other _standards, are, _ addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the • provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.2 (Tree Removal) is reviewed elsewhere within this report under Section 18.150. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant has provided a mixture of screening and buffering materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 130 -foot height and its communications purpose, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. The monopole itself has not been designed to attract attention more so than other similar freeway interchange light standards. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on-site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings. Other existing trees within the adjoining State Highway right -of -ways are also expected to partially screen this facility. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 5 ro osed, complies The use, as lies with all site development standards set fo P P p p forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing trees will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met�by this 4 proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The location criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minimum of a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request for a Variance. The applicant has requested a Variance from Section 18.106.050 (J) that requires all areas for vehicle maneuvering to be paved with an asphalt or concrete surface. The applicant has proposed to gravel the driveway that would provide access to the proposed monopole facility. A Variance to a development standard may be approved where the following findings can be made: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; Due to its limited nature, the proposed driveway pavement material Variance has not been found to be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title. The proposed Variance is also not in conflict with specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 6 2. There are s ecial�ircumstances that exist which a peculiar to the lot size, P P shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Due to the developed nature of much of the property width along the site's • Public Street frontage, developing this facility towards the street would limit the future development of this property to provide access to a facility that rarely requires access. 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The Variance is to a development standard and has not been proposed to allow a use that is not permitted in the General Commercial Zoning District. A Utility use is allowed under a • Conditional Use Permit, as has been proposed. The Variance allows economic use of a smaller undeveloped portion of an existing commercially developed property. By allowing the Variance, future additional development of the property can take place without requiring reconstruction of a paved access driveway. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The variance allows the applicant to avoid constructing pavement of a driveway to serve a small portion of a partially developed commercial site. The nature of the variance is limited in nature such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by this change. The Variance will allow additional use of a partially developed commercial site without precluding additional, more intensive commercial land uses that are permitted within the General Commercial Zoning District. The Oregon Department of Transportation had no comment on the use of gravel in this instance. 5. The hardship is not self imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that site constraints such as the partially developed nature of the property, its size and shape, and the limited need for access of this proposed facility dictate its location. Construction of a gravel driveway of 15 feet in width allows emergency vehicle and monthly maintenance vehicle access to the facility and is, therefore, the minimum Variance necessary for this purpose. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a subdivision application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a site plan that identifies all existing trees greater than twelve inches in caliper. The applicant has proposed to remove all 11 trees within the area proposed to be developed with this use. Three of the 11 trees are located along the northerly portion of the site and were found to be healthy. The applicant shall review realignment of the proposed gravel driveway and the proposed fencing with the arborist in order to preserve these trees if possible. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 7 • Where it is not found to be possible to preserve these trees, a tree mitigation program shall be provided so that there is no net loss of caliper inches where less than 25 percent of the existing healthy trees are to be preserved. The plan shall mitigate the total number of caliper inches of healthy trees that are lost. • Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards: 1. Retention of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; 2. Retention of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with 18.150.070.D; 3. Retention of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; 4. Retention of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: 1. A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. 2. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably ,available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. 3. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 4. The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. 5. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. ........ ::.:::.....::..:. n' lieu of tree replacement a ma Witt <ahe:consent of the::Director;:::elect:_to:::co e nsate. >the::::_ >:: This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 8 • • The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six feet in height. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation, Aeronautics Division reviewed this application and had the following comment: The proposed tower shall be lighted with a dual fitted red obstruction light mounted on top of the structure in accordance with Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 70/7460, Chapters 4, 5 and 13. The Oregon Department of Transportation, Engineering Division reviewed this application and had the following comment: No new access will be permitted to SW Pacific Highway West. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, for the new driveway to be constructed to the frontage road that provides access to SW Pacific Highway. The applicant shall pave a minimum of a 20 -foot paved driveway shall be constructed from the edge of the existing frontage road. No other comments or objections have been received. 14 444 ' 1 August 19. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner August 19. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard liewersdorff DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0006NAR 96-0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE . Page 9 • i I . l .o• I Z II CO CI J • 0 1.11 Z Z Z • Q a i Et • Q c� ■ I el.M•I• GYMS : , ' L' C. i E. 4 :1: j . �'i ze o.s 0 Z I ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CASE NO. Western PCS Monopole EXHIBIT MAP 7 CUP 96 -0006 VAR 96 -0010 • • • • • • �, ON i 0 foo. • . .. _ ,.!,-.. z ..._:. i i.:....._ 4,.--. ., -._ ,.... •-......, ,- - _ _... - •.... s;... --:-.0f.. • , -- _. ! /;� ;� _ 0 •. CO /./..,<\•\ • • -,..- k .- i l r -_-.. • ..<:� =. ► r 1 • o . Ka to wn`,111," " ; ; :i '' p , w ..+ears mu. au i -. h\ lMillIMPIN Viii i US V suilli AgmwoS►.l1 4 4 ; 10111 1 Z . I 1 r, MA Z Z a -J a�: -- a ii Ca 1. I! (� Q lit i i s. `�� ' � �:� III $ AT 114171L 1 "i" s ' kii U. -�` � 1 . I! MINIM OREM MI.M. fir 0 N SITE PLAN I CASE NO. Western • EXHIBIT MAP A CUP 96 -0006 VAR 96 -0010 . ... e . . 111 „„ 1 --- er pragiumw e , — mill l a l L a I i . .. A m o m MUI61 4 ___ 2 illin i IMO III A111 11 LI NE am 1 1 minim mi ii 1/ 11111 'I IN Imi 1•1 I t 111 aim- III .... ow jilmr• wi E -1-• N : VI mai mil c 1 1 I/IIIII: :1•• :Rimr , EN arm r :I pi : w44 I J 1 laa 11 No --7 MI IIP 0 1 IIII - In NIMMIIIII t - 4,11 111119 co 1 t , , ■ I l l ! P- III ' ' 0 •_•,, SUM 'ARCELS--->> I.:: 1 c i 1 . ■41k 1 c o 1 1 : • 1....... i .., , 1 ip■ \■ la I i loi 4 lia • 7 • L._ i . ' II 1 1111 p lir ! 0) ,....... , II ! h .. 2 W 1 4... I 0 1 1 =kb > ik a, 1 ;w I t y,-/ i 11 NIA Lde• l' . - isaaat 1 1 1 1 1 i Vicinity Map A ,1 CUP 96-0006NAR 96-0010 ' 1 Note: Map is not to scale Western PCS Monopole I N 1 1 I i :: , . • • 10-213-1996 8 : 43AM FROM P. 1 .• • III iic:f.f.,7. . KOLL Teleco II . unication Services 4. A t.x...x > LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 4 ,N: v44.x. ' 7535B N. E. Ambassado ' ' lace '!: '!',:, FOR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ...i...........:, .......: :::4=...,t: • ....x4 ,..: Portland, Oregon 97220 • ...........• Office: $03-284-8714 . Fax: 503-335-9635 '1.1.4.".....t.. , ..%,> . .....t: %=tt • • .%......P.... . No. Pages Faxed: -10:1,4zA:.,...:§Jx?.w. ,....e.,.,....:,..,:..:...,....:....................,-................,...•••••• , • .4•%•%•■.,•• • • •••<■■• .. • . S• .... • • ... ..'' 1•••, ,• ..„,,' • ..,•■ ,•••.„'•,,: • 4. ,••14?11•>14•%,;.•=n::::4: . :; • {VA : ,?n„.......] ...•••:, .j .: , • • •:•:. .. : . , ••■• • • .. ■:' :',,: • •:::::;:.=;:....,:=1; ... • ,A. .. 0 .:• , :‘ , • ,, •:...n ... :• ' .. :', , ...i :t' • • . : ,, ki ,, ; , .. ,... .4:e Wir4= ...e.ni i....i.. • • • •• • ••• • ' ... 4, ....< TO •:::z DATE: ....:...?...-:....? 10/3/96 City of 1 • ttl•••TrN: ATTENTION: .. Mark Roberts : . < „.... 1r , A RE: Wiring Layout ....,....., Phone: 6 • , 171 Fax: 6847297 I.:::•.m.f.z.-.: SITE NAME: Greenberg srrE NO. P0-1373-B ...............„ gtiV4 • WE ARE SENDING YOU ' 1 Attached I:=1 Via Courier III Vin Federal ::.= Express ..4.-A......:;.:::::'..:::::.:::;?.:g:,m.x.1 A;•-,.,, M.A.f.,==ita,l'g'...Z:ggi=.:.&.===*:?'44"MikV,iEN:::;.:.:: .......• . .. . ''''''''•':''''"•••:•• . : , •.' : .f4=Vja".'''''''";'..t.'`K.."!":!$::I'Vr7"'C'1.:;:llgt>:!:::?:::.'.:;:::::::.!';:...n::.:..:..:...''''....:.•:' 4 ...ei...;V:.:::.'1:'..f . ..'5..-75' . ;V:':" . V::::':!:::::::':::::'t1;.' . ..:V:::':::”:Z.':2."::" . :•::;:' :::::: ....A.x .......w. • ........ '-' . .. •••.•••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••................ .. ....„ . ..........,...,.....,...,,,..,....„..,.....,,,,,,x,,,:,,,,,:,,,„,,...... Via Hand Delivery X Via FaX a via United Parcel g'g.V.'t!4',!..:1:`4"S<'',Igki4,i,"..:wek,',4:.:".:.;::4"; .....A...A...p.N. ..... .,......:•,.4:::..:eA::::A:,a ■: -4.4 ......<4.. .::; '' '..; Viii4i,Wi"$ ' ri. '"•'. ,, ''''. 1 •''' :' :;::=":,:=;:::':':.',1:',Z:'.:!•:::!:>;:.:••:' :::'•:r . ' .. ''''''''"4:4;',:r.:=1:::::::::::::.3::::Z::':Z:::tr.:Z=41=1::•;:',:;,!!i,',:>%::::::4'. 1 ..... ....... ..... ...... ... . . .. . . ..,....„ • • . •:• . ;;.:.,.. • .,,,. :...0... ...... .: •:. N Via Pick Up ' Via Mail Other .............. ...::.....,.y,..:4...-...g....,...-<: ::$........$-: , -4.,.....4.:.....:.....:......., ......; • i.%.% . {...44 , V$,}' . 1... ..4 74..,"...,..... \ :7."4:4(::.:4,:k,:........,:.): :.: „ .... ,•, NO ..: ...:.% .. : .4 •• U,,,■••••.....,,,..0•4,,,,,$•,,,,,, ..i.;....31=Vg;■■ V. ,.....,..',:.....'',• ...r ..,1,,,..,.....‘x..,,,m,,,4..,„1, ,i•iz:•=z;!:tk.N.,•=1 ..... ,... COPIES DATE . NO. DESCRIPTION Installation layout for 101-150 Ft. tower-FAA A. - A-0 — , . . • • • • .... .. ••-••••• " ". " • • ..... •••••••••-•-• ••••"•••••• ••••••••:„.."••••••••:.••••••. ."-" •••••.): : . . .. :..::,,.. •,•:....:... = ..... iz , = .. z .,... m ,,,,„.:,:,..4 ; 4 ; ; ; ..: • ,.....,...::4• I :. z .•, : ...=•=,-z , ‘ „4%.,•1 ! ..... :! : z ....,. 1 : ; ,,,:tti ;; ,,y,14.:•$;*., , : .::;:iw.,. m .,,,.. 4 ,:.,„;..,....et. r ...„ .. ... v itwi?,. , &4,•, , ::::• • •..; ; ‘,....., : >:,-e.:.,..0:.,,,... 01$417., N....S.ANS,c4. , ..,,-Q,.-,,,,,, , . ,,,. % i THESE ARE SUBMITTED As Checked 1=1For Approval 1:771 Approved As Noted 1 Original Document ..................................................................................................................................... ,•••••,.....--_,-,......,..,, ..Sel ........ X.N.N.0.4(....:r.Y.tif....} s ., . 1 , . o K , . . . .X, ... , ........• ........54 K• . P , , •i'AAK•• • ...:f ~••:■■•■A:P,..q.:X; ■:'..........• ' :.....•4V • • ' -. 0 \ r :'.: ..... • :2`; .:' j::::: • : 7.•: .:..::•.% .•:• : :-....-:::•:':•:'`...• X. X•K•74.1,3: Y;4 }V,k4{N.15-.73AVA. A• ., ...Ns. 54*M<V4M3,r4smam... • •i , .A...x.x.w.kr..4.:444,4..vA5...inwp.::....:...N.-... L I j For Your Use mroved As Submitted For Bids .:,.. ,,• . ........--,.......,....,...... ...-." ",s..... w-" . ....”4.64-A,........ , .... ....,,,,,,..„4,4.....„...:„.,..,...,„...,..s.,..,.. = 4 W ,....4,,,.,..,... ......,,.. *NOtA44,:t......,...... : ■ ,. ■ : $■!.' , : . . : .: 4: W■■ • •.:4 , %:**$,Y4ORN,' ,. .,:*MS •MAS 4■.•,."5: +V..M$4:1,i ;.K.:We.le..,t •AM :=,•M X :=1:=Taag ValtinN As Requested E:i Returned For Corrections F Retumed To Sender For Review EaResubrnit Submitted To City .. ...........,.. „..--.....—..., .... ......-.-...„....„>. ., ...,.,......-......,......--....,...........„:„.. x. r•i ' . :r....t...1:'.V.:::::4 '.'1.... .i.i',.`.'":;k:•:••::+ REMARKS Please fin : attached the informatin requested on the above shown construction site. . — Please ref!x to your plan check number 07-0IC, Receipt #96-281192 site location 11744 SW Pacific Hwy. Monmouth, Oregon . ' ' - •, • . • - COPY TO Ray Zeldezehuis SIGNED . . • Lee Nielsen • • Construction Department KTS 10/3/96 9:23 PIA Page 1 I • (5 )• PO WER _/ 1 ''" , I .� "`''. l/ IS .cv .wA.. eo II/S T ALL A -! LA T F OR MATERIAL LAYOUT \� WIG DIAGRAM 20 -100 FT. TOWER FAA TYPE A -0 ._ , m . I BASE KIT P/N OCB21A00V2 - F.A.A. TYPE A -0, RED LIGHTING KIT w o a 1 e - = BILL OF MATERIALS (D W M / @1d OYE _ ITEM H 4c P PART N0. DESCRIPTION ERI QTY IIA o�.t r.,.r ern _ TvP. 1 O822A31 - •— ^v ff r,ivcTSOH= t- TSH- T devble eed - . 1 — I ! , I IA L H 11 6 120GE LAMP, s:del: t, 116*., 120v. 4 I. : ;I I 150 MAX �h co ; ,I,I I i ,I i . III� 4 JB22220000 JUNCTION BOX, TAPSCT2,R2.B2.L2i 1 A 4A JB20200000 JUNCTION BOX, - r /Coble supports, TAPS(T2,82) 1 01 O _ O 48 JB2222C000 JUNCT1011 BOX rt /cable supports, TAPS(1 R2,S2,12) 1 D 5 B6AO301AB BREATHER ASS'Y, 1/2' 2 3 6 PE2B69MF ELBOW. Golv., 1/2' 1 8 �■ 7 P11206004 PIPE NIPPLE. l /2' 1l 4' 2 h\\; 6 TOWER HEIGH X" 8 PP2HbSH PIPE PLUG. Gott'. l /2' 2 s \> < N \ /�! W " FT . 8A PRO203B4R PIPE REDUCER 3/4' to 1/2' 1 0 ■ \ I� J 9 CNO2BB4 LOCKNUT, Conduit, Goly„ 1/2' 6 \ - 10 PU261MF UNION, Conduit. Mole, 1/2' 2 xi • '. 12 TZ05DSS10012 TAPE, wrappl1ock, kit, s.s. (1/2'XIC.O0 1 0 CO O 0 13 AKOIPC016W PIPE CO1•IPOUlII con 15 SLI6t0 M CONNECTOR, Scotchlock, typPG 0 16 ATM075089 TAPE electricol, 1188, 3/4 X66' 17 9LCA001000AS LIGHTING CONTROL 1 TO HACBA52C001 HOUSING I 19 PA446F21BS PHOTOCELL ASS'Y 1 . THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE MX INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE KIT BUT ARE REQUIRED FUR iris TALLATIOII 20A WR03X1209 VIRE. THVN, 412 -AVG. WHITE F T. 175 208 VR03X120S VIRE. THVIl, 1112 -AWG, BLACK FT. 175 I 1 23 CHO2B4R120 CONDUIT. RIGID, Goly, 1/2' X C,F T. Pcs. 18 J Q /12 AWG, THWH, WHITE • -- EXAMPLE OF WIRE & CONDUIT -/ l0 REQUIREMENTS TOR A ISO FT. ■ f OVERALL HEIGHT TOWER WITH � �, /1 7 AWG. THWN, BLACK A 10 F T. BRIDGE DISTANCE. i \ 1 4" \\. ■ J 1 D ■ 0 0 1/2' CONDUIT Q V�20 ye- CONDUIT n 0 TYP. hIOT E S: • i EVERY 10 FT. CMIM) 1. I4OUNT ALL JUNCTION[ BOXES WITH DRAIN I• HOLES AND CABLE SUPPORTS DOWN 2, USE PIPE COHPOUND ITEM 1113 @J ALL THREADED CONDUIT PRIOR 10 INSTALLATION 3, THE FAA 6 FCC STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT THE VOLTAGE AT THE LAMP SOCKET BE VITHIN 3% O 0 19 OF THE RATED LAMP VOLTAGE_ WIRE S(ZES SHOWN HERE VERE BASED OH AN INPUT ■ 0 1_ — 1 VOLTAGE OF 120 to 127 VAC. I- PHASE. 2 `,,k.:, VIRE, MID l20 VOLT LAMPS. CONSULT THE Q ■` ■ ® _ _l FACTORY FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. \: T YP. 0 _ 77' N 0 A 0 „ la CONTROL( iiI r HUGHEY & PHILLIPS INC. 2162 UNION PL, SIMI VALLEY. CA. 93065 A ALARMS —•f. 7° - IHPUT CONTROL POWER INPUT, 120 VAC, IINTSTALLATIOI - I LAYOUT FOR N Q ROVER 60 Ha. .275 KVA MATERIAL LAYOUT WIRING DIAGRAM 16 101 -150 FT. TOWER FAA TYPE A -0 • 10 -03 -1996 8:45AM FROM P.3 IP Hughey & Phillips, Inc. Double 0 r uction Lights Obstruction Lights • .FAA L810 (AC 1 /5345 13D) FAA L810 (AC 15015345.43D) Applicatio Application These Hugh . & Phillips Obstruction Lights are designed for These Hughey & Phillips Obstruction Lights are designed for 0 the lighting of evision, radio, microwave, and transmission the lighting of television, radio, microwave, and transmission line towers an I ther obstructions to aerial navigation as line towers and other obstructions to aerial navigation as specified by th , FAA, FCC, and Transport Canada. specified by the FAA, FCC, and Transport Canada and ICAO. vr.„ j ...... . . . • Model OB22 '•.., -:. Wit Model 0824 ObsCueSon Li it Model 0820 Obstruction Light Model 0821 Obstruction light (bottom entrance - type) (We env= conduit blue) (bottom entrance conduit titling dye) (side entrance conduit fitting type) • The 0B22 and 0 B24 double obstruction lights are equipped with two • The OB20 and OB21 series Obstruction Lights are equipped screw base lamp: Qoeptacles. with a medium screw base lamp receptacle to be used with 69 •The fixtures are st aluminum, utilizing approved Red Fresnel lens of the watt lamp for Class 130 to 70 candela or 116 watt lamp for flange type and available with both side entrance and bottom entrance Class 2 71 to 150 candela conduit fitting taped to 3/4" or 1 ". • The fixtures consist of cast aluminum fittings, utilizes an approved Red Fresnel lens of the' flange type. The OB20 is of the bottom entrance conduit fitting type in order to facilitate installation of vertical conduit stub. The OB21 is a side entrance Model 062 & Model 0624TR (Transfer Rela y) conduit fitting type for the horizontal conduit runs. Both types are available in 3/4" or 1" conduit entrance taps. • Under certain . 'rcumstances, it is highly desirable, or • The flanged Fresnel lens is seated against a Neoprene long required, to em) y a lamp transfer relay with a double life gasket cemented to the fixture base. Drain holes in the 3!1' obstruction ligh'. This relay is of the single pole, single throw, fixture base prevent the accumulation of condensation moisture normally closed . Only one lamp in the double obstruction within the unit. light is energize when a transfer relay is used. Upon failure of • The Simple Positive Stainless Steel Spring latches provide the first lamp, t it relay will transfer power to the second, or for easier maintenance on all models. standby lamp. 1 P e relay is mounted within the fixture base. A • Relamping is readily accomplished by unfastening the side pilot light may b connected across the standby lamp in order latches and removing in one piece the lens holder and the lens. to provide remct, indication of lamp condition. The relay is A retaining chain is fastened between the lens holder and designed for us:. with 116 watt, 120 volt lamps. fixture base to support the lens holder assembly during Ease of In Ilation servicing. • In order to si 'Oily installation, and facilitate wire pulling, the Ordering Information obstruction Ughts with Red Lens lens holder base ssembly of the light fixture may be detached Catalog Conduit Conduit Lamp from the fixture ase by removing four (4) self- retaining Number Tyja Entrance MR Recot, screws. After w rig is completed the lens holder base 0B21 A31 Single Side 3/4" Med. screw assembly is easil fastened to the fixture base. Ordering Inf rmation obstruction Lights with Red Lens 0B21A41 Single Side 1 " Med. screw Catalog Conduit Conduit Lamp OB20A31 Single Bottom 314 Med. screw Number Ty e Entrance Tap Reept. 0B20A41 Single Bottom 1" Med. screw 0622 -A31 Do le Bottom 1/4" Two med. screw 'Lens also available in aviation yellow or blue. OB22441 DO le Bottom r Two med. screw Weights: Single -Ship. 4 lbs.; net 3 lbs.; Double -ship. 8 lbs.; net 6V OB22TR -3 Doi to Bottom '/i Two med. screw lbs. 0B22TR -4 D le Bottom 1' Two med. screw 062X8 -4 ' Do le Bottom 1" Tw cl o . med. cable sc support) wy) Descrl Replacement ptian Parts (in 0824-A31 Do 1 le Side ) /<' Two med. screw 0624 -A41 Do H Side 1" Two med. screw lamp: 116 watt A21/TS, 120 V. med. screw base LH 11612oG Part E No. 0B24TR•3 Do Side 3 /4 Two med. screw Neoprene gasket' A� (Ind. trans. telay) Lamp Fresnel t.ei ptat s m screw FL C e 2200 0624TR -4 DoJ t.: Side 1' Two med. screw Yellow Ftese (ens: FL04B02810 (Ind. trans. relay) Lens Holder Asir. wiCaain: B6A000BAA 'Lens also available aviation yellow or blue. SPAD ABA000BAJ Weights: Shipng E net 61 lbs. Relay,�� 1Ca85NnCO522C . • . 30 -03 -1996 8:46AM FROM P. 4 'l 0 Hughey & Phillips, Inc. ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS ' AC Input P ' er 1 120 VAC t 10%• 60 Hz, 1 phase standard; 11 Temperature I -67°F (-55°C) to +1300F (•SS°C) per MIL - STD -810 195 watts day and red night operation. 60 watts alternate white night operation Humidity 95% relative humidity per MIL - STD -810 0 ......_..:,...._____________. DC Input F diver 24 VDC t 10%; 120 watts day and red night operation. Wind Wind speeds up to 150 mph (67 nt/sec) AS watts alternate whoa night operation Wind Loading 105 lbs at 150 mph (240 kph); Surface area is 1198 ft Power Op ' ns 240,480 VAC t 10%; 60 Hz or 2 40 . 480 vAC s 1011.50 Ftz Transient . Transient protection is provided by; Wind Blown Rain Exposure to wind blown rain from any direction Protection , • Circuits which incorporate series ich ite se resistors and per MIL - STD -810 zener diodes On all signal IEnes Salt fog Exposure to salt -laden atmosphere per MIL - STD -810 •5 kilovolt rated transformer. primary and Secondary line to ground Insulation • OPTICAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS • • Rectifier diode network protection by varistors . . ' System Status Two neon lamps and four LED's indicate system BEAMwEAD' PEAK FLASH raoso indicators I and subsystem operating status. INfEr43fTY� FLASH RATE DURAT1ON System Tc Manual override switches for remote day and MODE $orlmntal Vertical (eatreefee) (fteahes►nrin4rte) (mlUla.eendA) Controls night operation testing. Push button operation for • testing fault circuit operation. Day/Twilight 3so r min 40 410 Saftey I The flashhead and power supply are both equipped ' with interlocks so that opening either unit Interrupts Nigh t Red I Sao' s 7. 40 750 the capacitor charging circuit and discharges the high . • voltage energy storage capacitors in the power Night White 3E0' rein 1.500 Min 40 100 to 260 • supply to less than 50 volts within 30 seconds. maws* 2,500 mat Notes: 1. The Tower edge of the vertical beam spread lies between -1.5' end -0,5' with respect to the horizon. ' 3, FlasWti'np light Out meets the FAA minimum repulremente of 15.000 wndetas dayttwilipht end 1,502 candelas night for a period of not less than one year. 3. Wrest t M effective dash duration Is generated with a group of than flashes, the hash Fete is not less than 30 per se04rnd. TYPICAL CPTICAL PERFORMANCE VERTICAL BEAM PATTERN - DAYTIME HORIZONTAL, BEAM PATTERN - DAYTIME LIGHT OUTPUT VS. CABLE LENGTH MALF POWER 00• 250 FT (7E4) , CABLE DAY CANDELAS L0•vTS Os GABLE LENGTH CANDELA . 25.020 MAX IIIIIA■■grc 30,000 0 soy . \ OF CABLE 1 (I) ► Y05t t t5,000 am Ile• o• too F a r (scout 170992 90 MO PT (132M) 'MO FT (30464' teeso II/. ` OF CABLE ISM CANDELAS S. o00 10.000 CANDELAS r•N{ . -e a 0 2 • 2 25.000 GAMMAS 270' t L HT PULSE DURATION FLASHLAMP LIFE •UGHT OUTPUT SPECTRAL TRANSIMISSION rsourrz PEAK — RELOA FLASMLAMP INTENSITY I 'ODN Eu9lmcA. DED TRANSMIS$IYITY '•EAR „ -.. - • - .- los% 50b odes sole tress* 11 = MILLIONS OF FLASHES A. DAYUGRY MODE 20% ttuS+ • TI445 TOP 1LAsWFS - 12 HOURS OF DAYUOMY OPERATION, 200 500 400 500 60D 700 102 • 3AS DAYS/YEAR I WAVELENGTM PM MANOMETERS • MECHANICAL DIMENSIONS SS-177 POWER SUPPLY SS-17a FLASHEAD -44.01;444444_40.4 • F 4444► i NOM (••••••• . . 1 U.9°MfO. 1 • 4444.: .............. •111••••••••11••••••. u N,4JJi 1 I•• .•it �� LP i 307 w • .. fi____ ... .., r „ Pica ."7.3074.”. . • I u 4. I ' I 1b ”". • • f • 11 ! J.... I II MI5 . F. �. 4444 I�� - M• GI I�h l 1 ' Y I • t ` ;7—. � - - A " 7 .ma , . I � .,.. ......... ..I ; iii I I - I .s. � "', Ir.A4nA ■a« L •>/r e44r ......mom L 41. GO - , .4, IW r.4ed. MK .. SAKE (w.<70r11 i 34-1 ' to r,.ir. r. i�14ka. II ••••• W ••••••• 4.41----: • • KOLL THE REAL ESTATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES SERVICES COMPANY September 13, 1996 Mark Roberts City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, Oregon 97223 RE: CUP -96 -0006 We have evaluated the possibility of realigning the proposed driveway with the arborist, our construction crews, and the landlord, and have determined that it is not feasible to realign the road. However, after re- evaluating the construction and design limitations of the site, it was determined that two of the three healthy trees could be preserved. The proposed retaining wall, which was originally called for, will not be necessary. I have attached the revised arborist report for your review, which describes our mitigation plan. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at 284 -8714. Sincerely, Michael Birndorf Koll Telecommunications ATT 7535B N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -8714 FAX (503) 288 -5741 • • • • HALSTEAD'S ARBORICULTURE "Specialists in the care and CO NSULTANTS preservation of trees" David Halstead. Consultant B.S I K P.O. Box 1182, Tualatin, OR 97062 11 ' Phone: (503) 245-1383 September 3, 1996 ATTN.: Mr. Larry Wother Koll Company 7535 NE Ambassador Place Suite "B" . Portland, OR 97220 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Greenburg Site k '130 j " A. Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan The following is an addendum to my report dated June 20, 1996. 414 . 4 In that report it was your intention to remove all of the hazardous trees as well as tree numbered 1, 2 and 3 because of the size restictions of the site, proposed drive way and i the parking area. Revisions have been made per "Site Number P0- 1373 -B" realigning the drive way and doing away with the proposed retaining wall. In this way Western Red -cedar numbered 2 and the European -birch r ' ) numbered 3 can be preserved and will be reflected upon within this report. • �_� General Field Conditions. T here are 11 existing trees over G C 8 12 inches in caliper on this site. The landscape plan shows fit?‘ 8 trees on the site. Most of the trees on this site were planted approximately 25 years ago. , I. Due to the variety of species, the symmetry of planting and their age it is apparent that the trees are not indigenous to • M the site, although many are native to this area. Individual Tree Preservation Inventory. Out of the 11 trees on the site 8 trees are hazardous, diseased and insect infested and 1 Western Red -cedar will be removed to allow driveway excess to the site. 1 1 • • Page 2 September 3, 1996 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Greenburg Site Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan Starting at the north west corner of the property and proceeding south along the east /west property line tree number 1 will be removed because of the driveway. The mitigated trees are tagged and numbered 2 and 3. These will be preserved re v 4 anothe sered remaining trees which are hazardous are tagg ed 11. Tree Numbered 1: Western Red -cedar 22 inch Caliber. Remove due to driveway access. Tree numbered 2: Western Red -cedar 23 inch Caliber. Tree is in good health and structure and will need protection and therapeutic care due to the proposed construction trauma. Tree Numbered 3: European Weeping Birch 24 inch Caliber. Tree has a double trunk, but is in good health and structure. The Birch will need to be protected and requires therapeutic treatment due to the proposed construction trauma. Tree Number 4: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 18 inches, an approximate height of 50 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 5: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 12 inches, an approximate height of 45 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 6: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 22 inches, an approximate height of 55 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 7: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 60 inches, an approximate height of 55 feet, and a limb spread of 20 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) • • Page 3 June 10, 1996 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Greenburg Site Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan Tree Number 8: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 8 inches, an approximate height of 30 feet, and a limb spread of 10 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 9: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 14 inches, an approximate height of 45 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 10: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 26 inches, an approximate height of 45 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Tree Number 11: Tree is a Lombardy - poplar with a caliper of 26 inches, an approximate height of 45 feet, and a limb spread of 12 feet in diameter. The health and structure of the tree is rated as poor (hazardous.) Individual Tree Removal Inventory. There are 9 existing trees to be removed on this site, one tree due to it's location in the proposed roadway and 8 which are dangerous to extremely dangerous. The 8 Lombardy - poplars have been infected with a disease for several years and are half or nearly dead and /or are severely root damaged or are decayed beyond repair. Further, there are very few trees that are more dangerous than a dead and /or dying Lombardy - poplar. • S Page 4 September 3, 1996 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Greenburg Site Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan Tree Removal Discussion. Tree removal should be completed in a careful manner so as not to damage any trees on the neighboring property or the two trees that are to remain. Any tree to be removed within 15 feet of the two trees to be preserved should have the stump ground out rather than excavated. Preservation Discussion. All parties involved with this project should be notified of the tree preservation area /s. High visibility fencing needs to be erected at least 15 feet from the trunk of the trees or as far as construction allows. Any work within this 15 foot protection area will be under the supervision of the consulting arborist. The dumping of excess soil or construction materials is not allowed within the dripline of the trees without the notification and consent of the project arborist. Pruning, root pruning and therapeutic fertilizing may be needed in order to ensure the trees survival. Mitigation Discussion. Out of the three good trees we are retaining, two are being preserved, or 66 percent of the trees. Therefore, we are required to mitigate 50 percent of the total caliber inches of the trees to be removed. The Western Red -cedar tree to be removed is 22 inches at caliber therefore we are required to replace with like trees or a total of 11 inches of like trees. Western Red -cedar trees are nursery grown and available, but not at the size required. Further, planting a tree which is 11 inches in caliber requires enormous effort, expense and the possibility of the tree dying is likely. Page 5 September 3, 1996 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: Greenburg Site Subject: Tree Removal, Protection, and Mitigation Plan However, Western Red - cedars are available at 4 to 6 inch calibers and the planting of 2 or three trees would insure the trees would survive. There is also enough room in the far south east corner of the property for such plantings. If I can be of further assistance in this matter please call me immediately. Sincerely David Halstead B.S. C.A. ATTN.: Mr. John Silenzi Koll a �F - r• I, ; - -- 2f_ A IJG �— /3 9 ITY OF TIGARD . k 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. _ % PORTLAND OR OG R , �6 '97'40 8 06 ,- 9 ; Tigard, Oregon 97223 1 c7 4444.6.1 "\ %44,4444,,,,,,,,,... ?4175 • v . ' \ 1 . $17Z-lg A DP 2 . . ..Q (m--,,:_ti_E-Ailia - Z ,...).-c„ . a Z 4 ,1, 1s136CC oo1oo , / 5 Z a BARASCH, STEPHEN BY WORLDWIDE REAL ESTATE C .tttl 0° GENERAL MOTORS CORP W Q- 485 W MILWAUKEE AVE 7' ityi DETROIT,MI 48202 I La CC Ae►tUt.ar- :,vast", Ill::lfideedilll►+il,ldllidl iii tttttiiiiltl ,llmlnl,illisimii UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Dear Postal Customer: The enclosed has been damaged in handling by the Postal Service. We are fully aware that the mail you receive is important to you. Realizing this, each employee in the Postal Service is making every - effort to expeditiously handle, without damage, each piece of mail with which he is entrusted. Nevertheless, an occasional mishap will occur. The Postal Service handles approximately (154) billion pieces of mail each year. It is necessary, therefore, that highly sophisticated mechanicaVelectrical systems be utilized by the Postal Service to insure our customers prompt delivery of their mail. At times a malfunction will occur, the result of which is a damaged piece of mail. We are constantly working to improve our processing methods so that these incidences will be eliminated. You can help us greatly in our efforts if you will continue to properly prepare and address each letter or parcel that you enter into the mail stream. We appreciate your cooperation and understanding and sincerely regret any inconvenience you have experienced. Your Senior Plant Manager RECYCLABLE 7 liser JIR� J • CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, AUGUST 26. 1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0006 VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 :ILE TITLE: WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum 7535 B NE Ambassador Place 21390 SW Edy Road Portland, OR 97220 Sherwood, OR 97140 REQUEST: > The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. ' LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY, COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO .ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 96-0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 8/26/96 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF - REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER AUGUST 5, 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT. THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE —NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY —FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY —FIVE CENTS (25c) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, .OREGON.: _ , . . e amtb....„ g m r. 1 no . r III 1 m __- - --pi ■ 1 II 1 4 .00 �A SUB! . ,. i i� PARCEL --» ‘• 0. .t.._ . i irve ti. ♦ si ° /a ./m , 7►. S CUP 96-0006/VAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 8/26/96 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER AUGUST 26, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. TOWN HALL TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223 153 dingone wishing to speak on an Agenda item shoutd sign on the appropriate sign -in sheet(s). PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639 -4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: ➢ Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and ➢ Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. (OVER FOR MEETING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2 8/26/96 PUBLIC HEARING h: \patty\masters \agendho.mst • • City of Tigard, Oregon CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER AUGUST 26, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 >WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE< CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006NARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval to a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to allow the use of a gravel surface as an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S136CC, Tax Lots 2000 and 2100). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C - G). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134 18.150 and 18.164. 2.2 >TRENT TERRACE SUBDIVISION.< SUBDIVISION (SUB) 96 -0005 The applicant has requested to subdivide a 30,492 square foot parcel into seven lots ranging in size from approximately 3,129 square feet to 3,878 square feet. LOCATION: The site is located at the south east corner of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Spruce Street (WCTM 1S135AD, Tax Lot 00500). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: County Designation R -9 /Pending a City designation of Medium Density Residential (7 -12 dwelling units per acre). ZONING DESIGNATION: County Designation R -9 /Pending a City designation of R -12. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.54, 18.88, 18.92, 18.100, 18.102, 18.150, 18.160 and 18.164. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2 8/26/96 PUBLIC HEARING h: \patty\masters \agendho.mst • Agenda Item: - O., Hearing Date: August 26. 1996 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE : CITY OF TIGARD ING' FOR THE. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0006 Variance VAR 96 -0010 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested: 1. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit approval for a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and associated equipment structures. 2. The applicant has also requested Variance approval to allow the use of a gravel surface as an access driveway to this facility. APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum 7535 B NE Ambassador Place 21390 SW Edy Road Portland, OR 97220 Sherwood, OR 97140 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). ZONING DESIGNATION: General Commercial (C -G). LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1 S136CC, Tax Lots 2000 and 2100. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134, 18.150 and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Variance will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to the following recommended conditions of approval: STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 1 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: (Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact shall be Mark Roberts, : Plannin g Division; 503 639 - 4171 ) :: : 1. The applicant shall provide lighting on the proposed tower with a dual fitted red obstruction light mounted on top of the structure in accordance with Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 70/7460, Chapters 4, 5 and 13. STAFF CONTACT: Thomas Highland, Aviation Planner, Oregon Department of Transportation. 2. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, for the new driveway to be constructed to the frontage road that provides access to SW Pacific Highway. The applicant shall construct a minimum of a 20 -foot paved driveway from the edge of the existing frontage road. A copy of the permit shall be provided to the Planning Division. STAFF CONTACT: Jim Doherty, Oregon Department of Transportation. 3. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface to be constructed within the leasehold area. 4. The applicant shall review the option of realigning the proposed gravel driveway and the fencing with the arborist in order to preserve the three trees that have been found to be healthy. Where it is not found to be possible to preserve these trees, Section 18.150.070.D requires a mitigation program so that there is no net loss of caliper inches where a development proposal is to retain less than 25 percent of the existing trees. The plan shall mitigate the total number of caliper inches of healthy trees that are lost. THIS; APPROVAL SHALL. BE VALID FOR. 18. MONTHS : . :':: FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The property is developed with an office building that is occupied by a veterinary clinic. Variance 88 -32 and Sign Code Exception 88 -05 concerning the height and size of a proposed sign and related structures were filed by the current property owner. The City • has no record of any more recent development applications having been filed for this property. Vicinity Information: STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 2 • To the north the site is adjoined by a frontage road that provides access to the property from SW Pacific Highway and is part of the State Highway right -of -way. To the west of this parcel is Highway 217. To the south and east the property is adjoined by the Costco Store. Site Information and Proposal Description; The northerly portion of the site is presently developed with a Veterinary Clinic. The applicant has requested Conditional Use Permit Approval to develop a 130 -foot cellular • communications tower facility and related equipment structures. A Variance to the type of material to be used for access to this facility has also been requested. The applicant has requested to use gravel instead of an asphalt or concrete pavement surface for the proposed driveway to the monopole facility. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 130 foot cellular monopole. This use is classified in Code Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a utility. Code Section 18.62 lists utilities, as a conditionally permitted use in the General Commercial Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.62 states that there is no minimum lot size requirements. Developments within the General Commercial Zoning District are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscape plan for the leasehold area that is proposed to be developed. The plan appears to provide in excess of the 15% minimum landscaping requirement. The applicant shall provide calculations concerning the percentage of landscaping to impervious surface ratio within the leasehold area. Setback: Section 18.56.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street No side and rear yard setbacks are required except; a minimum of 20 feet shall be required where a commercial use abuts a residential zoning district The site does not adjoin a residential zoning district and, therefore, complies with the setback standards of the General Commercial Zoning District. Building Height Limitations - Exceptions: Section 18.98.020 states that any building located in a non - residential zoning district shall not exceed a height of 75 feet subject to certain criteria. Section 18.98.010 exempts structures that are not intended for human habitation. The proposed cellular monopole is not intended for human habitation and is exempt from the height requirement as provided under Section 18.98.010. S eet Trees: Section 18.100.035 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees. Section 18.100.035 requires that street trees be spaced between 20 and 40 feet apart depending on the size classification of the tree at maturity (small, medium or large), with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height Although the existing Veterinary Clinic has existing STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 3 street trees, these trees are not in compliance with this standard due to their spacing and h P p g the total property frontage. It is recommended that this section be found to be not applicable to this proposal. The proposed leasehold area does not have direct frontage on a Public Street. The existing site improvements are not made more non - conforming through the development of a new cellular communications use. This determination is consistent with the Non - Conforming Structure provisions of Section 18.132.040 (C).' Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of r- parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking . spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. The applicant has not proposed to develop a parking lot in conjunction with this use, therefore, the listed parking lot screening provisions are not applicable. • Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 -foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 -foot distance points with_ a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height The height is measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the . street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. The applicant has not proposed to construct improvements that exceed the aforementioned height within the Clear Vision areas. Minimum Off - Street Parkins: Section 18.106.030 does not specify a minimum parking ratio requirement for an unmanned utility use such as the proposed cellular communications monopole. The applicant has not provided a parking lot to serve this development. Because there is no minimum parking ratio for this type of facility, no off - street parking has been provided. Access: Section 18.108.080 states that commercial and industrial uses that require less than 100 parking spaces provide one (1) access with a minimum width of 30 -feet, and a minimum pavement width of 24 feet This use does not require that parking spaces be provided so two way access is also not needed to serve this facility. For this reason, no specific access width is required for this use. Through the Building Permit Fire and Life Safety Review any necessary revisions will be made to this plan to address fire vehicle access. - Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 4 • 18.62, 62, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.130, 18.134 18.150 and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these Sections are reviewed within this staff report. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions _ of the previously _sections.. _ These ,other _standards F are_,. _ addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to: the' provisions of 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.2 (Tree Removal) is reviewed elsewhere within this report under Section 18.150. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. The applicant has provided a mixture of screening and buffering materials to screen the ground mounted equipment. Due to its 130 -foot height and its communications purpose, it is not possible to screen the entire facility and still allow the necessary clear line of site to the antennae structure. The monopole itself has not been designed to attract attention more so than other similar freeway interchange light standards. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The applicant has proposed to screen ground mounted equipment through the use of new landscape plantings. Other existing trees within the adjoining State Highway right -of -ways are also expected to partially screen this facility. • Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. The Police Department reviewed this application and had no comments or concerns with this development as proposed. Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 5 • • The use, as proposed, complies with all site development standards set forth for the General Commercial Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Fencing, landscaping, and existing trees will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this - development as proposed. All applicable of the zoning district are met�by tthis___ __ proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The location criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minimum of a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Pacific Highway, a designated Arterial Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. . - - No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The small leased area requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use, leaving remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. • Variance: Section 18.134.050 allows approval, or approval with conditions, a request for a Variance. The applicant has requested a Variance from Section 18.106.050 (J) that requires all areas for vehicle maneuvering to be paved with an asphalt or concrete surface. The applicant has proposed to gravel the driveway that would provide access to the proposed monopole facility. A Variance to a development standard may be approved where the following findings can be made: 1. The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title, be in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, to any other applicable policies and standards, and to any other properties in the same zoning district or vicinity; Due to its limited nature, the proposed driveway pavement material Variance has not been found to be materially detrimental to the purposes of this title. The proposed Variance is also not in conflict with specific policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 6 2. There are special circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the lot size, shape, topography or other circumstances over which the applicant has no control, and which are not applicable to other properties in the same zoning district; Due to the developed nature of much of the property width along the site's • Public Street frontage, developing this facility towards the street would limit the future development of this property to provide access to a facility that rarely requires_ _ access. • _ - - - - 3. The use proposed will be the same as permitted under this title and City standards will be maintained to the greatest extent that is reasonably possible while permitting some economic use of the land; The Variance is to a development standard and has not been proposed to allow a use that is not permitted in the General Commercial Zoning District. A Utility use is allowed under a Conditional Use Permit, as has been proposed. The Variance allows economic use of a smaller undeveloped portion of an existing commercially developed property. By allowing the Variance, future additional development of the property can take place without requiring reconstruction of a paved access driveway. 4. Existing physical and natural systems, such as but not limited to traffic, drainage, dramatic land forms or parks will not be adversely affected any more than would occur if the development were located as specified by this title; and The variance allows the applicant to avoid constructing pavement of a driveway to serve a small portion of a partially developed commercial site. The nature of the variance is limited in nature such that no traffic, drainage, land forms, or parks will be affected by this change. The Variance will allow additional use of a partially developed commercial site without precluding additional, more intensive commercial land uses that are permitted within the General Commercial Zoning District. The Oregon Department of Transportation had no comment on the use of gravel in this instance. 5. The hardship is not self imposed and the variance requested is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship. The hardship is not self imposed in that site constraints such as the partially developed nature of the property, its size and shape, and the limited need for access of this proposed facility dictate its location. Construction of a gravel driveway of 15 feet in width allows emergency vehicle and monthly maintenance vehicle access to the facility and is, therefore, the minimum Variance necessary for this purpose. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.025 requires that a tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided with a subdivision application. The tree plan shall include identification of all existing trees, identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper, which trees are to be removed, protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. The applicant has provided a site plan that identifies all existing trees greater than twelve inches in caliper. The applicant has proposed to remove all 11 trees within the area proposed to be developed with this use. Three of the 11 trees are located along the northerly portion of the site and were found to be healthy. The applicant shall review realignment of the proposed gravel driveway and the proposed fencing with the arborist in order to preserve these trees if possible. STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96-0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 7 • • Where it is not found to be possible to preserve these trees, a tree mitigation program shall be provided so that there is no net loss of caliper inches where less than 25 percent of the existing healthy trees are to be preserved. The plan shall mitigate the total number of caliper inches of healthy trees that are lost. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. accordin to the following standards: 1. Retention of less than 25 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to Section 18.150.070.D. of no net loss of trees; 2. Retention of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that two- thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated in accordance with 18.150.070.D; 3. Retention of from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; 4. Retention of 75 percent or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: 1. A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site characteristics. 2. If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural resource value. 3. If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance with the following formula: 4. The number of replacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private property. 5. The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. ':'In >lieu of :tree: re lacemen under wi e..consent "o :: p.. ... may;: .... the < : Director etecf:to com pensate o i co is sts <:rn: erformin such This section requires a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal for trees over 12 inches in caliper. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS STAFF REPORT CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 8 . . The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Building Department has reviewed this request and provided the following comment: A Building Permit is required for all fences, towers, and walls in excess of six feet in height. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS The Oregon Department of Transportation, Aeronautics Division reviewed this application and had the following comment: The proposed tower shall be lighted with a dual fitted red obstruction light mounted on top of the structure in accordance with Federal Aviation Advisory Circular 70/7460, Chapters 4, 5 and 13. The Oregon Department of Transportation, Engineering Division reviewed this application and had the following comment: No new access will be permitted to SW Pacific Highway West. The applicant shall obtain a permit from the State of Oregon Highway Division, for the new driveway to be constructed to the frontage road that provides access to SW Pacific Highway. The applicant shall pave a minimum of a 20 -foot paved driveway shall be constructed from the edge of the existing frontage road. No other comments or objections have been received. i n 4 • f ' • August 19. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner 7 kiek,4 Pe,,tet-,44 I. August 19. 1996 - APPROVED BY: Richard gewersdorff DATE Planning Manager STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0006NAR 96 -0010 - WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Page 9 • • ; 1 I• 1 .....x....... � 4 ry1i II z - o.,____ UV MOW II I ,^ II i II � I j a u * ( I r l , Z Z Z a J a IX a c.1 OM Inn , '.� — , I 0 :::'.71-7i1"''':.1!,, ti s p [M M I I,:I.- .fir .;, ssw ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP 1 CUP 96 -0006 Monopole VAR 96 -0010 1 • • • • J.,- . . - , ..., r ,.. r , • • / 1 :_-_: : : :‘ t .\:- . d .-: .- -. 4 ,',./# ) ,.. ,... ...-- I , + Most .F a i -. \ulauiI1E 'Winn / i �O r I IIIIII Ap M� �':,,r,;i / / //I�i . '4EJ/Ui11 °- Z 03 'MI l a �T: - �� ` � -- a • L Q l �\ 1 I I Cr • .. 1 III N. =-;-./ - SIN a - `' AI - "1 ' vi ir i 1111 !® ; � MR egagAtotroi : t� d o -, :1 t O . e� - - ' }- r - ...I Nj • • -- SITE PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP A Western PCS Monopole CUP 96 -0006 VAR 96 -0010 , __, • 0 i l • r i II ing nalpag 4 I I I NMI II iiiir III nfilli if .1. a =I ! ! I ll ' jill - Ora Aillikil . 1 )11.1 i In a I 1 i um I sullmit. II Nom no II ar. - • I Ird _ ....2 E - ailli ' ■ilits 1 ti 1 I: R. 1 New 1 1.. sim _1 a or -=: 1 • P i 0 , 1 11 klft ■ .111111 PENA1111911 A t iii Ir • • 1 o vi 1.1 •,*.. SUM I s t*S* ( 4 1 c i • 1 (13 1 \ ''' S 1 ■ ' 1 Mr''.2 i LMMI CD . 0) 1•61■I I % I 1 0 1 : a 3- : l 1 7 1 1 4 I N tit t 1 >; ..;.,. . sok Urn b 4 k i ll I 1 7 NVv MIN • , 11 11■1114 H , . .: Vicinity Map A !CUP 96-0006/VAR 96-0010 _..‘ 1 Western PCS Monopole Note: Map is not to scale • COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS INC. •'` P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684 -0360 TT 8599 h'� NOtI �`. , , i- 4 • i BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 •': ': ✓`;" �' - '' - L egal Notice Advertising €; ~ `i �, e `,' ' I •City of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet Notice F ! V r iT I. • • , � k "' ` ": I 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ;Mi .1 . a . ; ' " { + •Tigard ,Oregon 97223 7 2 2 3 • • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit ` ''' 96 ` 5 ° •Accounts Payable • O TAG R G rd., '.';';;LA • :al 4 -Sr, it 1 •, " ._ � • ! ?' � ;': . AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION =, a � Public otices is ,.,:•: STATE OF OREGON, .. . ~ � . ,c j� ' � , 4 , •� 44.. • S WASHINGTON, jsa Oe fp to t w,lll be,cott tiered by tli gar4494pgs� ffl. � O .S v i COUNTY OF WA HIN , • u ' h'1ard Civic Center - o • , if Kathy Snyder 3 �1 -, : :, evard;Tig ••,., , n.Bothpublic'``iat ';".,, .. being tn0 v 1171 �blic t ,,141:,.,! • •� . ; t , in first duly sworn, depose and that I h eg y orn, epose an say at am the Advertising 1 ti i ' , r , , {� r4i. y r ° li t n wi l of a a. th 8:3 (a >r, Director, or his principal clerk, of the —Tua 1M-in m mes ! � .� � r •, ,, i , .. C�¢e��rulf� its oP a: ng bffl eiF �, ` :�. a d newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 Issue 'rsb br , 0 ; . � i; and newspaper published at Ti q de in the y r1 y'Idttit accohl anie b y statemen on ii : c ie it to alloy* thd� ei'ritigs autho 4, • ' parties ;to arespond%prec ' ' es aforesaid county and state; that the an ap eal cand .ith •'riteri'oti=frothi. eg..omm ty Public Hearing CTTP9Fi— nnnti /VAR96 —nni n �, ., • ., a printed copy of which is hereto annexed was published in the directed precludes anr ..! . . DeZelopjnent.Code.or +Qampiehens �c : ca t , •appeal,based ri, 't e Pluntgt w i " nterion )} ! : ,r p entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and • may be obtained -frQm beiPla ni ivis o { .. T' P . (3� , l p;at' 131'��_ '� 13olevat$i '�'gard. 0 ogo • n J 9.'3, or b' 'nSi0 p?-41711 r i „1 :.. , , ' - consecutive in the following issues: • , ” of + / , �; ' r ` " 22 ' ` ' ^rt . : `' T7F " 1 �rr�is# :E ;ssit. y� ;r„ '+ t it? y� , " , t an r•i i,; i YY4, 1 fV. J J •!. •,,,, N , k" i 4 ban r August 15,1996 �►.. {' t {, ' 'iEt1 j,� t. = 1 ',;. n.1 {i �!ri11 C , (CUP)f r0!00 '. % i s C 'YVAR 6• 1 • t • Y "rci! • :,D � �>7) b°n� � 'VARIAN E' ) 9 00 0 .; �. �ta�ppJ�l"i,� ' � .0 3t WESTERN•'PCS.MVi0NOROLE i` ,.�' u I • tt,:, : ..l .,, f'sih , ' 'i: ',P ' ,v , �`fft:� , i foot i4.11,t�ce ai ti 1i 01 ra gll - a•lit t s41 .. IT :{ , ;!:!L Ns , ui a tt.4. C' Subscribed and sworn t afore me thi s t �", t .;.+.' ,, -• `t be '1` ' ��' . ' b. •' ,.:!1 (13 i 1.511 i. 1 . , : ve or e s ' , I i �t : 4 ,! ;p• P:0144 1?f,pii(:' 1 ti } . , :• V'R ,, ,, ') 1`.4:jGener ;6.11114g7 ,060,L, c al ( . ,. : s onin: stns ` t: °• ► :tail •. se ce�uuses Notary is for Oregon and utility uses, subject to conditi ,use,TRer , . i PLICABL�E'REVIEW t RITERIA, ommunity lbp'� ' • My Commission Expires: �� Chapters ;18c62; t188I00ac18.102 ; -18: 0•)" 8.1011: . 714; , ' : j 81 - . 0 . AFFIDAVIT ; and 18.164.' • , -'- :. '� )h '' i 1 . • t . . 85 ?r ,ybti J , ma gus, ^ . t 15,1996 41 u4.41 " y � b 1, ; `,r " . E. • � adz. t :s.. :;:. - _..i.r,,,t,.. ./ .. — - - - -- - — -- p . ,�. f• . ,, . .li - ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENZ TESTIMONY ON THIS OPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE LIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER AUGUST 5, 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. gm, wr LINA auThrj ri re 11_ INN rap ,111 imi - _ � r _ , _-1_ 3 _= �■ -� - �1I II MI el za - „,..w... 1 Mira k rill _r� \ ;/- - SU • 0, � --» W PARCEL -»: 0.41.0,11 Ai_ > -10 1. NI J °:14.■ a a II *I p • II r, t 0 CUP 96.0006NAR 96-0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 8/26/96 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING • • A .R: CITY OF TIGARD • PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, AUGUST 26. 1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0006 VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 FILE TITLE: WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum 7535 B NE Ambassador Place 21390 SW Edy Road Portland, OR 97220 Sherwood, OR 97140 REQUEST: > The . applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE ' - IGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. CUP 96.0006NAR 96-0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 8/26/96 HEARINGS OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING or-\ fi 91 ). 4r ,.4 , )i ii • = CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS -' i ie,t5 P DATE: July 2. 1996 07: 13 TO: Laurie Nicholson ODOT - Region 1/Transportation Planning FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT:, Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 63 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 )' RE: CONDITIONAL USE ERML-TTCUP 6 0 06 _ ARIANCE (VAR) 96 - 0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall_ cellular_.;communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters .18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the pr9psat in the ne_ arfot�,r If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: onday -July 15 - 199 ou may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unab Wto respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • Written comments provided below: As we discussed during our telephone conversation on 7- 26-96, the proposed tower should be lighted with a dual fitted red obstruction light mounted atop the structure IA With Fdereal Aviation Advisory Circular 70/7460, Chapters 4,5 & 13. • (Tkase provide tizefollazuing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting ?h E. Highland, Aviation Planner uDCIf, Aeronautics Section I Phone Number(s): 503 - 3784N X240 use CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS 0 4Q i • -r II • /I.'''. . . • 4 .! ,'. /....: Isly. b r . ., i . -.. c i f ^; I Q • • //;::::: ,' . - (..„. - / Li: CO / ' '. /. : ' . 1 ' . re r i - 1 • IV ate CA.12. 0 1W. NM ROWt1.11p • ,:. �i ' 0 • A• A' SI SOWS sSIS SOWS ISCILIIIIIII K. s ■ r I.IOre..s Was vt L Z Q -J a. CD Ce 1 11 ' ' \ . , "-.= 3- . ..1) AI TIIMIIIIIIMI 1 III - o T � •1 W `' saga P _ =•sue \ `l N ` Aim 111111Z ,_ 44 11 ® ®� t 11 t 1 17 --� . :1 MILINLIFAtt..--;' _j ■ I 1 - I 0 N 1 I • ,N • • SITE PLAN I CASE NO. 9 Western PCS Monopole EXHIBIT MAP I CUP 96 -0006 VAR 96 -0010 • • MERICOMTM C O R P O R A T I O N • April 26, 2002 Mr. Edward J. Miller ODOT 5440 SW Westgate Drive #350 Portland, OR 97221 -2414 RE: Approach Permit; 11744 SW Pacific Highway, Tigard @ Highway 99W Dear Mr. Miller: Attached is an Approach Application and $50 check for processing. This is an existing access that has served the property for some time.' The roadway currently terminates at a cellular mono -pole tower developed in 1996 by VoiceStream Wireless. They did not complete the required approach permit at the time of the development: Mericom Corporation as Agent for Salmon PCS (dba Cingular Wireless), is simply proposing installation of additional antennas upon this existing pole and equipment cabinets in the existing fenced compound area. No other development or modifications are proposed outside of the existing fenced equipment compound. Given the pre- existing nature of this access, and the cellular mono -pole generating far less than 1 vehicle trip per day, we ask that this review be expedited. Mericom is simply "cleaning up" for VoiceStream Wireless and their failure to obtain this permit prior to development of the pole back in 1996. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICOM CORPORATION ( . Fournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303 -3012 E -Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com \( 2 1 (6) 40, CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: July 2. 1996 TO: Brian Rager. Development Review Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department TAF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) • hone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006/VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 > WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: • (P1 ase provide the foaming information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: t) I Phone Number(s): —7 Zrcyl— CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE / PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS FROM:KONICA FAX • T0: 503 684 7297 •,L 18, 1989 10:13PM P.01 RECEIVED PLANNIN REC 1(� ��h� JUL i 119 ".,- ..._..� .-_ti2 l RD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS D STRK T , DATE: July 1996 '�; ;' .; 1:-;:,,) 2. TO: f3ob Schmidt ODOT - Region 1 . Dist. .. _ , • ' I - - ' , • • • •.' I -. • •- A DC7t�4 SAC FROM City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 839 - 4171 Fax: (503) 684 - 7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006/VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 > WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility, LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG), The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 11.1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable f rewind by the above,date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. 'PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: N ,t / ,f- �/ • � O - - , e a'G �� /� - - ' i i . . 4 / op 1 0Y . eaSC p►vvid (fie foI7.nui rg i►fomiation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: _ ` Phone Number(s): Z Z 9— SW/a 2 I . . _ ..., •c.,.. nnn ..n.v.o... r PQnPOSAUREOIJEST FOR COMMENTS • • • RECEIVED PLANNIN ! ; l J REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JUL l 0 199 ITY OF TIGARD DATE: July 2. 1996 TO: Development Services Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006/VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 > WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: Y lit---9 LE We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: i • ►► I (Please provide thefoQowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: ,_ I Phone Number(s): I CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS ` • \/ ` / ,-v' ♦ ^ \ \�� RECEIVED PLANNIN Y I Iv JUL ® 9 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 19 9$ DATE: July 2. 1996 TO: Kelley Jennings. Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006/VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 > WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15, 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPL X . We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide thefolrawing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: .! ft 4 , I Phone Number(s): I CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS • DECEIVED PLANNING JUL ®8 19 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: July 2. 1996 TO: David Scott. Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96- 0006/VARIANCE (VAR) 96 -0010 ➢ WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 130 -foot tall cellular communications monopole structure and an associated equipment structures. A variance has been requested to allow the use of gravel surface for an access driveway to this facility. LOCATION: 11744 SW Pacific Highway (WCTM 1S1 36CC, Tax Lot 2100). ZONE: General Commercial (CG). The CG zoning district permits a range of retail service uses and utility uses, subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.62, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. >< Written comments provided below: \_ (Pkase provide t(ie foQowing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: 6 c I Phone Number(s): 3 0 CUP 96- 0006NAR 96 -0010 WESTERN PCS MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS western .WAL 0 ® § pcscorp 2 1p C WAL t 7535 AA SSOR PL. SUITE B x ' , PORTLA ND OREGON 9722 x gl 201 k , TEL r 4t r ; r ( 503AD) 284 -22 ona x x , I, ,r FAX (503) 284 -0402 ■ (, C. ) F , ? x �' I / ry t g x 4% x I ' ri • , , x .-101 4 GRADE AS INDICAT' D ) AVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. , O =MORS, PLANNERS, IANDSCRE ARCHITECTS ' NC) CORBETT HEM HEM PORThQ W, 0500)223-6669 / '� 1 • ' j i � II �I �� N �N gJ01BllNV I ldVii ',I!q p JIWIV'IIl 1 UVIII� j pl 70 li - -:( / %I' ��p / d tl l / x . ��� ii j II tl � 9 g' Iup.VmmVLIV> :�l,l 1 I d �' II! �� 1 1 �� o x 11 ��� �� �i , !'� ��� ���p� �� w. -,_ .. , L if x ) . % r I � , at. I I�VVVDVV�1VII �(1VIIIV�1_ 1101110 j4ze, ,,,, ,,," ,,, ,-*-- I 0) �� I �� II l � r o p I IyII .- 1 11� pH* �p�p�IIIOT II� ! I �,�I II' 7,, ��,� 1 "� DATE 5/9/96 e � / / Y I 4 II yl 1 I: III I 1 Y . � .` 41 �� I!o _ � , isioriaii:9 iiii . 4 4(1 t !' `�.ii r x / r I .��� " �� L'1114111$4 _ p 4 ���p p REVISION$ - � P I Illp' �� "I p'� I I � 1 1114 WII i I'Ib I I of :a " �Iadll VIII �V IIII a . N0. DATE ISSUE ' I. �� • _1- '_ Aisle '�' �— 0 t A 6/19/96 OWNER REVIEW COMMENTS x °EMOV: (E ) REES �_ I� P 0 ti • 11 N2:1 \ 15' WIDE EL — �' 1 ���1 I REM AVE (E) REE: O ACC SS L OAD PER I y x FIRE DEPI. R QUIRE NTS 0 Lr ASE ARE- „ 1 / x LANMSCA °NG ARE , II '`” SEE L 1 • r N - 1 T r - " .` SITE NAME ■ , ' ` " t" $ j O ED 30' -� �I �� J ( 15' WIDE GRAVEL IF LU •R COMM ACCESS ROAD PER r� � ► o l ____ i • • RAND EQUIPT. FIR DEPT. ftE UIREMENTS ; _ x — — vj : U • URA GREENBURG E Q �. `_ a� PR•POS D 5 MA , \ �- �� R EMOVE (E) TREES RE ININ WALL o �( i REMOVE (E) TREES EASE AREA , _ 5 LANDSCAPING AREA, SEE L 1 _ . \` x PROPOSED 130' •• s ' j CELLULAR COM _., gg L x IP r,> I "!1 R TOWER AND EQUIPT. -� PROPOSED 5 MAX , of ta u. 1111 9 - - 1 �. r ;< � � R EI • E L • RETAINING WALL \ • ' •_ , i � , � ENCLOSURE TR HN EAS SIT N UM' R' i 1 • ), . o'illi ko x f ,. k ° � REMOVE ALL (E) TREES �� A 'EA TYP . ,pii o 1 r WITHIN LEASE AREA — TY lotoor, it 0 x . ' �. A' I N A R C - , . .w. . - LANDSCAPING AREA, SEE L-- 1 i ya NOTES: x x , i . 1) NO NEW LIGHTING IS PR x OPOSED f ICI A T AI _ F SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' ENLARGED SITE PLAN / GRADING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' ...... .x�F fit' _ �fitn�i'y�5'ca4t#�' #7�i ;'� �, .. , .. .._. -.- _ :, . _• � - _ A/C AIR CONDITIONING GRND GROUND ARCHITECT PAGE ADJ, ADJUSTABLE GWB GYPSUM BALI BOARD REQ'D REQUIRED AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR GYP. BD. GYPSUM BOARD R0. ROUGH SITE NAME: SITE NUMBER: NUMBER: DESCRIPTION: SITE NAME UGH OPENING ARCHITECTS FOR DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES APPROX. APPROXIMATELY ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR 2828 S.W. CORBETT AVE. G REENBURG P0- 1373 -B TESTING AND MATERIALS HARD'WD• HARDWOOD S SOUTH T -1_ - • TITLE SHEET, OVERALL SITE PLAN, iiw . , AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE HORIZ" HORIZONTAL SHT SHEET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 TO BEAVERTON OWNER: GENERAL INFORM HR HOUR SIM. SPEC. SIMILAR C. SPECIFICATION BLDG. BUILDING HT, H SITE ADDRESS: G IIR N U F► HEIGHT 503 503 223 -6663 > 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY HANS AND MARILYN GRUNBAUM L -1 PLANTING PLAN BLK. BLOCK HVAC HEATING, VENTING AND SQ SQUARE TEL: ( ) BMR BASE MOBILE RADIO AIR CONDITIONING SS STAINLESS STEEL FAX: ( ) 233 -2701 � � TIGARD, OREGON 97223 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY • B/S BUILDING STANDARD STL. STEEL ! �� OREGON 97223 TIGARD STRUCT. STRUCTURAL J , ELEVATIONS I.D. INSIDE DIA. S TRU SUSUCT PENDED RA ¢ A -1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN, SITE SECTION, i IN. INCH S.V. SHEET VINYL C ONTACT: DANIEL G . MALONEY , APPLICANT: INFO INFORMATION S S ITE NUMBER CLR, CLEAR L w S - 1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY " PFAFFLE ST Q ' CONE. CONCRETE INSUL INSULATION THRU THROUGH Q > WESTERN PCS CORPORATION INT. INTERIOR SURVEYOR ¢ CONST. CONSTRUCTION TNND TINNED CONT. CONTINUOUS T.O.C. 10P OF CONCRETE Q 7535 NE AMBASSADOR PLACE, SUITE B LB(S) POUND(S) T.O.M. TOP OF MASONRY DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES N PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 • DBL. DOUBLE TYP TYPICAL I� CONTACT (WPCS): COLE GRAVES TEL: 503 - 284 -8714 P0— 373 —B DIA., 0 DIAMETER MAX MAXIMUM 2828 S.W. CORBETT AVE, ) DIAG. DIAGONAL MECH MECHANICAL UBC UNWORN BUILDING COD 3 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 CONTACT KOLL): JOHN SILENZI TEL: 503- 284 -8714 DIM. DIMENSION MET, MTL METAL . . DN DOWN MFR. MANUFACTURER UNO UNLESS NOTED PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DTL, DETL DETAIL MGR MANAGER OTHERWISE TEL: (503 ) 223 -6663 t DWG. DRAWING MIN MINIMUM — — SITE ADDRESS MISC MISCELLANEOUS VERT, VERTICAL C FAX: (503) 233 -2701 �, , � AN UNMANNED RADIO TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING E EAST VIF VERIFY IN FIELD F ti SITE OF 3 SECTORED ANTENNAE ARRAY AT TOP OF A 130 MONOPOLE SHEET INDEX EA. EACH Vf VINYL TILE �G� AND A 2160 SQ. FT. PROJECT AREA CONTAINING TRANSMITTER • �# ti 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY. EL, ELE N NORTH CONTACT: RON COOK ELECT T ELECTRICAL L NA NOT APPLICABLE W WEST CONTACT: O EQUIPMENT. EQ. EQUAL MC NOT IN CONTRACT WINDOW EQUIP, EQUIPMENT NTS NOT TO SCALE W SOILS ENGINEER A 9L TIGARD, OREGON 97223 E.W. EACH V,AY > F . ZONING: AREA OF PARCEL PARCEL NUMBER(S): EXIST, EXISTING W.P. WATERPROOF WITHOUT _ �� � � • EXT EXTERIOR oc, o/c ON CENTER DAMES AND MOORE s O C -G .36 ACRES R0284105 DOCUMENT REVIEW OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER 0 J 'L co FIN. FINISH OPG. OPENING 4 ANGLE 1750 HARBOR WAY, SUITE 400 0,, ,<. w ‘ "•-•/ FLUOR. FLUORESCENT OPP OPPOSITE & j AND = • PLR FLOOR CENTER LINE POR OREGON 97201 tir a r G` y � UTILITIES OWNER • FT. FOOT PLYWD. PLYWOOD \PC' ELECTRICAL UTILITY: PGE DATE GA. GAUGE PR PAIR R PROPERTY LINE T EL: (503) 228 -7688 'd SHEET TITLE "s' TEL (503) 590 -1233 • GALV GALVANIZE(D) PROD PROJECT ® AT FAX (503) 233 -6083 ( ) CONSTRUCTION — DATE GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR PROP PRESSURE TREATED NUMBER y � ' ? I L. �� TELEPHONE UTILITY: GTE OPERATIONS TITLE S H — ET CONTACT: JAMES W. JOHNSON P.E. C F� TO L AKE OSWEGO TEL: (503) 620 -5943 DATE / I \ REVISION 100 ROOM NUMBER 3 FIRE DEPARTMENT: TUALITIN VALLEY AND RESCUE REAL ESTATE DATE OV BALL SITE P LA \ FOUNDATION ENGINEER VI CINITY MAP RF ENGINEER I Q. KEY NOTE TEL: (503) 649 -8577 ZONING DATE G E \ E RAL I \ FO DATE 121I KEYED NOTE THE FOUNDATION ENGINEERING - GENERAL INFORMATION: WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE TOWER MANUFACTURER N LANDLORD — DATE MP DETAIL REFERENCE SECTION REFERENCE 1. PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE UNCHANGED SHEET NUMBER ' 0 6 ! i : 2. TRAFFIC IS UNAFFECTED DATE 4 ELEVATION REFERENCE 3. NO SIGNAGE IS PROPOSED DATE 4, MINOR SITE GRADING WILL NOT BE IN EXCESS OF 50 CU.YDS. T -1 . , ABBREVIATIONS & SY 1BOLS j CONSULTANT TEAM VICINITY U1AP (MAP SOURCE: THOMAS GUIDE - 1994 ED. PAGE 655 , GRID F /3) N,T.S. PROJECT SUM VARY APPROVALS PLOT SCALE: 1" = 1" _. e 4 1 Y r wes tern : \ 1 1 A, 4Apcscor 1 ,.) i 7535 NE PHONE AMBAS DOR 284 — PL., 2255 SUITE B \ tor Ali PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 ej a FAX (503) 284 -0402 II WI 1-0 I 0 0 al° 2 likVa41°.*Ir\_ : , 0 CD -I DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. _ _ _ -- - 'lam"— . .,�. # S -� GIMRS, SUR EYV g PLANNERS, IANDSCAP { 503 7S ARCHITEC / ,i TT - - .�.e,a .mss .1 .r �r �,.... X •• �. .��. �. A RIIAND, OR 201 9T -4889 1 e\ � \ \ 4sisossio. 1111 0 It fi e \ \ DATE 5/21 /96 ■ \ \ x REVISIONS `\ \ ` � NO. DATE ISSUE Nx \ XI /� \ - l! 6/19/96 OWNER REVIEW COMMENTS ■ \ \ . �i \\ g1 � � tom- - �I \I �If\ \IC e \ .i � 0 .../.„ I ° I 5 „„„ .... ,„ , ,. , 1 ro, d , , or g N\ 40111 ''z ' ' \ ' ' ''N W'%'' kgeV: IM '; 1 VS ' ; ?o , • r � : 'Z '5 f :4 #;' C C j am d`'s. <e ,.: y ,.'a�` i :,3` ,3:r 4 ' ' F C ' c : N 4 ., _--\ I . NN \ / +� J� . VC/ - ,. , N a,,,,,, ::„ ,0 . . 0 101( i . _ W � . 4 0 (9) I ELEVAY OSHA \THUS ciiiih N - I il : . f <1\\ <1\\11 < , `• (E TRELS TO RE AI\ 'kill e I .: urgioW604016*.Nevitotwratoffig.-211004,00..ataliftlWaitelk- e I } j # {: E I SITE NAME 0 It i I 1 e k` EBU RG _____r-r . t 1111) • a : SITE NUMBER ill 0 It- PO 13738 3 it i t O 0 . 4 SITE ADDRESS 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY PLANT I N G L 1ST TIGARD, OREGON 97223 BOTAN I CAL COMMON QUANTITY NAME NAME SIZE CONDITION REMARKS 9 OSMANTHUS DELAVAY I DELAVAY OSMANTHUS 2 GAL CONTAINER SHEET TITLE PER SPCNG ARCTOSAPHYLOS UVA —URS I K I N N I K I N N I C K 4" POT CONTAINER 18" OC TR I ANGULAR SPACING P LA \1 N G PLA\ NOTE: MINIMUM 6" NEW IMPORTED TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED I N ALL PLANTING AREAS AFTER PLANTING SPREAD 4" OF MUSHROOM COMPOST OVER ALL PLANTING BEDS CD , SHEET NUMBER 4 L1 PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1' -0" PLOT SCALE: 1" = 1" 3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TO BEAVERTON w : ,;; TAX LOTS 2000 AND 2100 y. r�= pcs cort IN J � 9 ::: -. ,.,..:„.. S.W. 1/4, SECTION 36, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M., _ \c) � � 7535 NE ANQASSADOR PL., SUITE B CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON PFAFFLE ST QPG \ c PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 Lu \ A < PHONE (503) 284 -2255 �P�- MAP FAX (503) 284 -0402 ,p \\A / & .. _ P o : % sITE « ".� A c G �P G� F 9 y REGISTERED C PROFESSIONAL G \` \ � p� N.T. S. LAND SURVEYOR F \ z s m � � o ? TRUE * a 2 : -1 t OREGON IN EDGAR JUL 30, 1976 V 0'19 37 °� R. COOK ' : ' � 1 / ti1 ACNEr /C � h . ! 1 073 ' - Ch o , P111 ■ t � . � i i�R TO LAKE OSWEGO RENEWAL 12/31/97 rn • /� 2 ( ROB) 18.12, -„ VICINITY MAP ' ' � (NORTHEAST CORNER O , P EON , � / PALMER TRACT) / i P 5j. s - DATE 7 BASED ON DEED POB ,, / 0 15 30 60 REVISIONS I PARCEL I PSe� N0. DATE ISSUE ,fi • � �' I O� 3.05 °'' A 5/06/96 PRELIMINARY • ,y �Q�.P�,t I I 35) �G „- & 5/17/96 ADDED LEASE AREA O �� <' 0 A 6/19/96 OWNER REVIEW COMMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION — PARENT PARCEL: — ' i � � LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEASE AREA. � G • a. \ ,� N / I '� PARCEL I: A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, � » V___r°‘ . ' 2�5 \ 3 8 IRO R� . i N O 41 29 W / THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF /b\ 7 � 1. �� d- IN (SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE THAT PARCEL CONVEYED TO RALPH L. PALMER AND ELMA E. PALMER WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, TO -WIT: BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 251, PAGE 759, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: J� w G�P�� i ' .. BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND IN THE GEORGE RICHARDSON DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 55, BEGINNING AT A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD ON THE EAST LINE OF AND 5/8" IRON ROD WITH 2/0_..---N , SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE SOUTH 00' 08' 00" EAST 234.20 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST -30" 1-1/2" ALUMINUM °A • V 0 - MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, CONVEYED TO RALPH L. CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 89' 41' 07" WEST 72.57 "OSHD" CAP VD. F PALMER AND ELMA E. PALMER BY DEED RECORDED ON PAGE 759 OF FEET TO AN IRON ROD ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF OREGON / «; : , „ • BOOK 251, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS; AND RUNNING THENCE HIGHWAY 217; THENCE SOUTH 50' 40' 48" EAST ALONG SAID ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE PALMER TRACT SOUTH 0' 08' EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY 94.03 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD ON THE EAST ?‘‘ o. b co LP ci m,, o '� 39.4 FEET TO AN IRON ROD SET SOUTH 52' 23' WEST 25.0 FEET LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE NORTH 00' 08' 00" WEST 60.00 LP �, :S: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TWIN OAKS LANE, A PLAT FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.05 ACRES MORE OF RECORD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE OR LESS. / N PALMER TRACT SOUTH 0' 08' EAST 194.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD .z: WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREINAFTER ,��\ • DESCRIBED; THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING RUNNING � . 6'b c;' ::_ - -- SOUTH 89' 43' WEST 192.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH J 0' 08' EAST 154.0 FEET TO AN IRON ROD ON THE SOUTH LINE OF x<::: w,, .;:::;: w:.:.;:--- :::, .: .::.: ::>.:.,..:::>:::: «.:..;:.k...... <:.:.. <._:.�°- -- 1"-- 1" E PALMER TRACT NORTH 89' 43' EAST 100 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE FOLLOWING SAID SOUTH LINE I I -_________ \ (S 89' 43' W 72.8\ NORTH 89' 43' EAST 192.8 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 5 I'0 • b THE PALMER TRACT; THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST 154.0 FEET TO ? ; THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT ,, LEAS ' ' EA., POB PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON, BY AND 6p. P )38R CB ELOW SURFAC EL I THROUGH ITS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, BY DEED RECORDED O Q- CC::: 5 " IRON ROD J 3, 1964, IN BOOK 503, PAGE 463, WASHINGTON COUNTY 9. � 0 RECORDS. . NOTES. .O�\ 9,(5).„. � ALSO BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT INC. AVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, IIN / /1/ �n OF LAND IN THE GEORGE RICHARDSON D.L.C. #55 IN SECTION 36, 1 CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE 1 FOOT. ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS LATITUDE 45' 26' 06.206" •4 I-- T1 S, R1 W, W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, CONVEYED TO RALPH '_ 2828 S.W. CORBETT AVENUE PORTLAND, OR 97201 (503)223 -6663 � L. PALMER AND ELMA E. PALMER BY DEED RECORDED ON PAGE 759 OF 2. ALL ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE BASED UPON LONGITUDE 122' 45' 33.305" �' a a BOOK 251, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DEED RECORDS, AND VI a RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE PALMER TRACT, G.S. VERTICAL DATUM N.G.V.D 29 1947 ADJUSTMENT. .:.:::.:.::<;.:;.:: : <..::,:....;..::.. :. « .: :.: ..< :.. :;:< I \ \ / >£' (II SOUTH 0' 08' EAST 39.4 FEET TO AN IRON ROD SET SOUTH 52' LEGEND 5/8 „ IRON ROD 23' WEST 25.0 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, OF 3. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE ARE BASED ON NAD83, 1991 T 0 TWIN OAKS LANE, A SUBDIVISION OF RECORD; THENCE CONTINUING ADJUSTMENT. V FIRE HYDRANT ? SOUTH 0' 08' EAST 194.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; RUNNING I SITE NAME _�i ° THENCE SOUTH 89' 43' WEST 72.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; 4. THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED 5 RUNNING THENCE PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE PALMER TRACT BASED ON A LESSEE PROPERTY REPORT PROVIDED -- co BY WESTERN AMERICAN . PROPERTY RESEARCH COMPANY • 19 ROAD NORTH 0 08 WEST 142.4 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; THENCE ® GAS VALVE o CONTINUING NORTH 0' 08' WEST 36.2 FEET TO A POINT ON THE THE LESSEE PROPERTY REPORT DOES NOT INCLUDE —..1 EASEMENT 1U- NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PALMER TRACT; THENCE NORTH 52' 23' SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION. <; 0 IR E E. N 3 1 GUY WIRE ANCHOR (PRIVATE) N o DEA IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BOUNDARY EAST 91.7 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO THE .: v RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC OF ALL PORTIONS LYING WITHIN PUBLIC DISCREPANCIES THAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL - 0-- POWER POLE m MAILBOX INFORMATION INCLUDED IN A TITLE REPORT. SITE NUMBER `f' d- RECORDS. � ° L) 5. OWNER: HANS H. AND MARILYN K. GRUNBAUM I o a, PARCEL II: o o o El POWER VAULT A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, 6. PARCEL NUMBER: R0284105 AND R0284098 1373—B TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN Y 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE L.0 . ;; WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT T RACT o I OF LAND CONVEYED TO RALPH L. PALMER, ET UX, BY DEED RECORDED j ® WATER METER I IN BOOK 251, PAGE 759, DEED RECORDS: ( SITE ADDRESS ] CURB LINE BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PALMER TRACT AND - RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PALMER TRACT 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY E DITCH LINE SOUTH 52' 23' WEST 91.7 FEET TO A POINT, WHICH IS ALSO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO JOHN TIGARD, OREGON 97223 X EASEMENT LINE METCALF, ET UX, BY DEED RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 367, PAGE 610, m WHICH IS ALSO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT r ="> (N EDGE OF GRAVEL LINE HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 0' 08' EAST ON THE WEST Ln LINE OF SAID METCALF TRACT 178.6 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST APPROVED BY DATE: - '/, i,/ — EDGE OF PAVEMENT LINE CORNER THEREOF ON THE NORTH LINE OF THAT TRACT CONVEYED TO - [SHEET TITLE ROBERT H. CANDLISH, ET UX, BY DEED RECORDED AT PAGE 141 OF OWNER ° — LEASE BOUNDARY LINE \ ti 5/8” IRON ROD WITH DEED BOOK 384; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THAT TRACT oI� OVERHEAD POWER LINE 1 -1/2" ALUMINUM CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON, BY AND THROUGH ITS HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC SURVE_ Y "OSHD" CAP COMMISSION BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 516, PAGE 341 NORTH 32' 38' 32" WEST 127.61 FEET TO 5/8 INCH IRON ROD ON THE OPERATIONS '' EAST LINE OF THAT TRACT CONVEYED TO FRANK STALICK AS `� oH OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE :,` 'n RECORDED AT PAGE 423 OF DEED BOOK 352; THENCE NORTH 0' 41' REAL ESTATE ° - -- PROPERTY LINE 29" WEST ON LAST SAID EAST LINE 1.86 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 99W AT A POINT ON A CURVE WHOSE ZONING m POB POINT OF BEGINNING RADIUS IS 1472.4 FEET; THENCE ON SAID CURVE LEFT AN ARC `s SHEET NUMBER RECORD DATA PER DEED DISTANCE OF 78.78 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3 " 03' RF ENGINEERING ( ) 55" TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID METCALF TRACT, NORTH 0' 08' WEST 3.35 FEET FROM A 3/8 INCH ROD; THENCE NORTH ..,1 _ ° [ ] RECORD DATA PER COUNTY SURVEY 17161 0' 08' WEST 32.97 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF y<' : S: 0o BEGINNING. (f) 1- --- _SCALE: 1' = 30' v v western A A pc s c 7535 NE AMBASSADOR PL., SUITE B NOTE: WHERE NECESSARY DUE TO SOIL SITE GRADE OREGON 9 7 2 2 0 CONDITIONS; REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL ITE C OF PORTLAND, AND REPLACE WITH 4 -6" OF 1 -1/7 CRUSHED SITE AS S INDICATED; WITH SLOPE ROWN TO FROM ALL CENTER EDGES ROCK COMPACTED TO 90% OR ENGINEERED OF SITE PERIMETER AT 2.5% PHONE (503) 284 -2255 (3) DIRECTIONAL PANEL ANTENNAS, FILL. REVIEW WITH PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR EACH SIDE OF ANTENNA PLATFORM; TO CONSTRUCTION FAX (503) 284 -0402 (9) ANTENNAS TOTAL MONOPOLE; SEE ELECTRICAL /TELCO EQUIPMENT CABINET SITE PLAN FOR HEIGHT I MOUNTED TO 3',3'x4' CONCRETE PAD PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS ANTENNA PLATFORM TOP OF ANTENNA �_ _ _ I -� 3' -6" 1 7 _ 6' HIGH CHAIN -LINK FENCE • T I ` TOP 0 TOWER �''�I\ - I , :: 1 : ::E A GE CONCRETE EQUIP. PAD MI� r, `I� 1� _� I j PROJE A REA BOUNDARY LINE — -� ill. i [ru I I � . ‘9, i b I FINISH SITE WITH 4' OF 5/8' N � FINES, APPLY OVER GRADED, NO • x1 / COMPACTED O 0/ FILTER FABRIC EQUIPMENT CABINETS (INSTALLED BY OTHERS) ' WALL I B THK C.I.P. CONC RETAINING FUTURE 2' DIA. I w /�4 ®17 O.C. EA WAY TlP IN (---- DISH ANTENNA _ __... s 2.5 I IL 200.0 STEM AND FIG -MAX HEIGHT 6' -d gip a 8 THK C.LP. CONC RETAINING WALL _ _ u �u,�u - -- ( ` W/ 4 0 12" O.C. EA WAY TYP IN � . i. ".. 1_ _� r- Li= u=u=u�jrr i=.uin I i ffa ., r - ,�-- ��.�r -�`�� - 1111=-1 -',� dam' � = o� p - ��7 ! �� c n- STEM AND FIG -MAX HEIGHT 6' -d r L - c 2 =. 1 1 ` =71 11=` _ - [ L 1L u ;4 v U l At- .,- - A ..11:�° - n. � -, r . n=n=nnn=T1. n 0 -- , _ - - n =1 � � j n DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. L n v - =1� _ -1 z 1 1p m m li r1i _ - n 1.- .m . Ir l y �1 Tom= _ --t0.11.=310.11= ° = . 11= 11_ _1:- n= „�° -n = n „tea i / 130 MONOPOLE • 1412:1244..-10- � ]L I -DI- _� ' ]I� - ��I� If-Op 1r �O - �7. R EAT GRADED STTE WITH APP ROVE D ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS f 111 l��Illlll-1 - 1� 1 - ` 1= 0 lf �ll � r f II - 10� 1= �11g11�11= WEED BARRIER PRIOR 70 GRAVEL FINISH I - - - 2626 S.K. CORBETT AVENUE PORTLAND, OR 97201 (503)223 -6663 I I r ' _ I -1.= q1 : i a �' i -- � �I U'3 -' _ I - 71= _ I 1 T r Ji „71' EXCAVATE MIN. NECESSARY 10 GRUB SITE; REMOVE SO, ROOTS AND ALL UNSUITABLE SOIL FROM ' la " AVM - - PROJECT AREA i I I USE SELECTED FILL I AND GRADE SITE WITH CROWN AS EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL 8" B' INDICATED; COMPACT TO 90% > TOWER FOOTING DATE 5/23/9 PER MANUFACTURER'S DWGS. HH > O I HA o S REVISIONS 1 1 - g,-'; NO. DATE ISSUE CD _ 6 /19/96 OWNER REVIEW COMMENTS O W TYP CAL SITE SECTION SCALE: 1/4 = 1' -0" 3 J O O < A O W 0 4 x 55 /b\ Z\ MP ACCESS PATH PROPOSED 16' WIDE -- _ - — ... LfaSEUNE _ - -- L \ \\ N \ 1 N\ \ • \� \ 2.1 b. GATE 31' -D" I I @n �\ \ ELECTRICAL / TELCO 3' -0" 14' - 0' 13' -0" 1 " N ;\ \ EQUIPMENT SU "ORT BOARD EQUIPMENT PAD SEE SHEET © 2' -0 10' - 0" 2' -D" 1' 8" 3' -10" 8' -6° ► \ \ r r f TOWER CENTER PAN ANTENNA; NA; • \\ \ \ EQUIPMENT I I EACH SIDE OF ANTENNA PLATFORM \ N I (3) ANTENNAS TOTAL - \\ \ ROUTE OF I \ UNDERGROUND UTILITIES CONCRETE TOWER \;\ \ \ SEE ELECT. DWGS I i ( FOUNDATION 1 \ o 111 I \\ \ U.) j - 130' MONOPOLE; SEE \\ \ o CE OF PIPE /CONDUIT ELEVATIONS THIS SHEET NN X \ All (AZIMUTH, 0' TRUE NORTH) N\X ° 9" ` ------ % I ' ANTENNA PLATFORM AT TO BIE ORIENTATED 15' TO TRUE NORTH. \ ► ( I TOP OF MONOPOLE; VW NOTE: ONE ANTENNA STANDOFF ARM \ :a- � •• SEE SHEET \ \ I \ \ I \ f o ; O li(-- 15' %.`N N 0 ;: iK:F: :E O ' TOWER CENTER 34 N \ !?, i >iir *iii:. ..,.o:a::i"i� I uaa> a �' € • V," e 1 A / WALL SHEET CRET / \ w M \ /I II \ c � I ® a w \ � \ 1 / I SITE NAME � 1 \ \ / I I i lz. V_k4---- 1 =====111•11111111/"A"MIIIIIS111111•11•11111I:111111111111•11W:1■■••■■•■• NW: (GREENL3UFICI �N fir _J \ UTILITY CONDUIT IN SLAB, SITE NUMBER SEE ELECT. DWGS EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED TO Ali PROPOSED CONCRETE PAD; BY OTHERS NV CABLE BRIDGE PROPOSED 6' HIGH CONCRETE EQUIP. PAD PO 13 f3 B FENCE W/12 „ OF 3 SEE E SHEET i nk 3-STRAND BARB WIRE AT TOP; STRAND BARB WIRE A.2 \ FENCE; 6' -O” HIGH WITH 12" FUTURE ENCLOSURE \ CONSTRUCT ATOP BLOCK RTNG WALL \ TYP. (4) SIDES; SEE SHEET (4 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CABLE BRIDGE \ SITE ADDRESS J CABINETS =��e.. --4 7�ii —fit SEE S HEE • N , 0 SUPPORT PIPE FOR I 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY tsz •:•::.+. `' • , •: � ` 01 CABLE BRIDGE (TYP.) \ • ,• I li `? MU "'is t.X : KIN • P' '•• ` e • ! x i`°` • ` TIGARD, OREGON 97223 �'' . .• ; t,� 'c h : EXIST. GRADE •• .. t ti . . �`•'• k•'e��: r2i�' . y Al }� a2st • s 1 ` sS33'S c ' • 4 •• ` � {{ s ;.ti .; TOP OF :- —_ . ... vise r ' � : , , k ,, ` mss . ,, •*..,:�� '' ::" • • • r ," • ti ` - :::.vi • :I:� ti ; I� • . C ON C. ' .•' � . �y g EL . 00 � ...n _ = gest r.1 ASSUMED N. \ SHEET TITLE \ I I = XT -RIOR - L- VATIO \S CMU RTNG WALL N , \\N, - \LARCD SIT- PLA\ SITE S -CTIO\ \ N SHEET NUMBER ([ A "' 1 SOUTH ELEVATIO\ SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0" 1 EAST ELEVATIO\ SCALE: 1/8 " _ ,' -0" 2 E \ LARDED SITE PLA\ SCALE: 3/16" = 1' -O" 4 SCALE: 1 =1 k A Y I f .. A, i / // / / // ..,____________________ , ,,.. I C pcscorp 441 x / i i ; 7535 NE AMBASSADOR PL., SUITE B X l / ' � % (40 0:ei 0 10( _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ ( P ) � — � s f; � I � ' , I s � {M � � . ;-..r.-, �� �x� � . PO RTLAND, OREGON 97220 PHONE (503) 284 -2255 L'..0-{ / ! l tp s FAX (503) 284 -0402 / / k S . t , / , x x I I Y / : 111.D\ � ` \ .1.1.4-10-.-1,,, A 1 x i / .' 6 A / / ," o / , ., 2' _ GRAbE AS INDICAT D I A VID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 4 1111 x x -- s - V 1 , ' WIDE GRAVEL ' • \ o ' t BAG , SORVgY0B3, FUN= LAHD9CAPt AI iSCI'3 - - x AC E S S ROAD PER N 1 II T 3 ► CORM OEM MUM OB 1't201 (503)223-8683 f 1 , :1,1 a28 x .. x _ FIRE v DEPT, REQUIREM \ ry ' I II F� T � l o9q 1;' ��ll�la !�� Illl �IUT�12i ��� �V : 91��a�u�'a�)l � r 1j11afll� ��T11',1''( I X \ 19:11119 1111111'll � � � 11 ''' r: 19119d1111.1111 1 �u 111. x �I _ ill h I .) , _/ ' It _II �� �I , , � 111 Al- •' _l -11''I:J I ' � . �' i 11 1111 ➢.11 � 11111, F 1 '� � r r „ I I / � Q ' I \ j 1 I, u m: II ulunumn d�f1m' , m•�Im DATE 5/9/96 _ � i a 4 I em 1 4 - I l tl➢ Q I l u g r uu11911 Iln 1 1 m. :N v i I ► �, � ��' dly �, I���I_�_Il�� ( '�� i�l��� ��I; �I r REVISIONS A x �e m A x _— • � \ v h � — Ili' ryl II I '' I •_ -`.� / I III III b li n II: I '� �� ��I ' I '! � II IGI I� ,�� VII � �pIV�a�11 II!_p @ II �� � I !��II��� pl 'I h Q�: O ��n11111I1 ' _ - u N0. DATE ISSUE • . a. PI iU - x x 7 � \ \�� ' - 6/26/96 PERMIT ISSUE E) TR , E # 1 TO B 2 9/6/96 _ �\ x ° ° ESER ED I POSSIBLE _i. t ; 0 CITY COMMENTS A ��' \ I.. � ( E) ,T - RF E #3 'TO 4 A fill i% \ 4 \:4 x I ' .• (E) TREE ,• 2 TS B1 PRESERVED ` BE RE D ERV �D Q f / / 400 , / / L AS1_ ARE 0 / LAN x / • DSCA ° ING AREi, ' I / SEE L -1 f � i a Ai / \ to 1. � i r. r ,ir \ — S ITE NAME: 15' WIDE GRAVEL \ . " g •; ,I ACCESS ROAD PER \ __ I' ; _� I� / z;;::::'5 $' i - rn _ , T 1 '=R, AND EQUIPT. x t, J t \ \ " � f x O PR�IPOS D 5' MA �- _ ij 0 E C OSURL GR E NBURG � �'i ° (E) TREE #3 TO BE �i RE ININ WALL (E) TREE #2 TO BE PRESERVED \ \ k "( • PRESERVED o J * ; \ \ 1\ 0 :11a III Ii5T �_ `� ' Sk_ --f LANDSCAPING AREA SEE L -1 L '' — \\ 1 , A' - ,i J -‘,1 � ' 5� • REI E L (F I SITE NUMBER: r ` A TH E ES W4 HIN A _EASE REMOVE ALL (E) TREES ITE.0111%, EAL� / TYP , LESS O WITHIN LEASE AREA — TY B OTH I 1 I � f �SCAI iN R -A 4 c (3-. , 0 z . , 0.0 I , �, LANDSCAPING AREA, SEE ` i PON,A1373EmB ,C� �� .,,,,„ 7 , NO1 ES: x ; ` \ \ i i + i ' R, r r D '. LEONARD C x � � �• is t r 1) NO NEW LIGHTING IS PROPOSED x N , ^— s- �� � j �► 9 �; " ' '° j DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS _,-,--'- s f ; • • 2) FOR PROPERTY LINE LENGTHS AND ' r ` �I 1 j ' ` I , OR cars , BEARINGS, SEE EXISTING SITE SURVEY x i L I �' SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' ENLARGED SITE PLAN / GRADING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' t ARCHITECT PAGE A/C AIR CONDITIONING GRND GROUND REQ'D REQUIRED ADJ. ADJUSTABLE GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD SITE NAME: SITE N.UM13F R: NUMBER: DESCRIPTION: J AFF ,ABOVE FINISH FLOOR GYP, BD. GYPSUM BOARD RO. ROOM _S OPENING ARCHITECTS FOR DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES SITE NAME APPROX. APPROXIMATELY ASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR 2828 S.W. CORBETT AVE. GREENBURG PO- 1373 -i3 TESTING AND MATERIALS HARD' WD HARDWOOD S SOUTH _ _ T -1 TITLE SHEET, OVERALL SITE PLAN, AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE HORIZ. HORIZONTAL SHT SHEET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 TO BEAVERTON GENERAL INFORMATION HR HOUR SIM. SIMILAR BLDG. BUILDING HT. HEIGHT SPEC. SPECIFICATION q SITE AD DRESS: OWNER: S -1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HVAC HEATING, VENTING AND sQ SQUARE TEL (503) 223 -6663 J 11744 SW PACIFIC 111v^' HANS AND MARILYN GRUNBAUM OFIEENBURO BLK. BLOCK AIR CO NDITIONING SS STAINLESS STEEL FAX: 503 233 -2701 ° �� 1 a BMR BASE MOBILE RADIO ( ) J TIGARD, OREGON 97223 11744 SW PACII I.WY L 1 f CANTING PLAN , STL. STEEL B/S BUILDING STANDARD STRUCT. STRUCTURAL _ _- TIGARD OREGON 97223 CONTACT DANIEL G. MALONEY — ` S.V. SHLE VINYL A 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN, SITE SECTION, I.D. INSIDE DIA. SUSP. SUSPENDED Q IN. INCH F z \ APPLICANT: CLG CEILING INFO INFORMATION F'FAFFLE ST P u ELEVATIONS SITE NUMBER INSUL. INSULATION A -2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CONC, CONCRETE THRU THROUGH `� > WESTERN PCS CORPORATION CONST. CONSTRUCTION INT. INTERIOR TNND TINNED S U RVEYO R CONT. CONTINUOUS T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE 7535 NE AMBASSADOR PLACE, SUITE B LB(s) POUND(S) T.O.M. TOP OF MASONRY DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES L PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 E -1 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN, DETAILS, P0-1373 DBL. DOUBLE TYP TYPICAL CONTACT (WPCS): COLE GRAVES TEL: 503 -284-871 4 LEGEND, AND SCHEDULES -B DIA., 0 DIAMETER MAX MAXIMUM 2828 S . W . CORBETT AVE .. DIAL. DIAGONAL MECH MECHANICAL UBC UNIFORM BUILDING CONTACT (KOLL): JOHN SILENZI TEL: 503-284-8714 DIM. DIMENSION MET, MTL METAL CODE PORTLAND OREGON 97201 E -2 ELECTRICAL GROUNDING PLAN, «, ON DOWN MFR, MANUFACTURER UNO UNLESS NOTED PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DETAILS, LEGEND, AND SCHEDULES DTL, DETL DETAIL MGR MANAGER OTHERWISE TEL: (503) 223 -6663 DWG. DRAWING MIN MINIMUM C , AN UNMANNED RADIO TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING - SITE ADDRESS MISC MISCELLANEOUS VERT. VERTICAL FAX: (503) 233 -2701 , c , 51 OF 3 SECTORED ANTENNAE ARRAY AT TOP OF A 130 ' MONOPOLE SHEET INDEX E EAST VIF VERIFY IN FIELD F EA. EACH yr VINYL TILE I � G AND A 2160 SQ. FT. PROJECT AREA CONTAINING TRANSMITTER EL, ELEV ELEVATION N NORTH CONTACT: RON COOK " :• 11 SW PACIFIC HWY. ELECT ELECTRICAL NA NOT APPLICABLE WEST '�� • EQUIPMENT. EQ. EQUAL NIC NOT IN CONTRACT W/ WITH SOILS ENGINEER v E ft QUIP. EQUIPMENT NTS NOT TO SCALE Q L WIN WINDOW TIGARD, OREGON 97223 E.W. EACH WAY W/0 C - X ZONING AREA OF PARCEL PARCEL NUMBERS �.. EXIST. EXISTING W/0 WITHOUT i \ ) • EXT EXTERIOR DC, c/c ON CENTER W.P. WATERPROOF DAMES AND MOORE s P° � � C -G .36 ACRES R0284105 DOCUMENT REVIEW 1 OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER C� J ti (`� FIN. FINISH OPG. OPENING 4 ANGLE 1750 HARBOR WAY, SUITE 400 ,P07., _1 J \ f� FLUOR. FLUORESCENT OPP OPPOSITE & AND � f 'y = � �G \ UTILITIES FLR FLOOR PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 s FT. FOOT 1 CENTER LINE PLYWD. PLYWOOD 9 �d ELECTRICAL UTILITY: POE OWNER DATE SHEET TITLE GA, GAUGE PR PAIR R PROPERTY LINE TEL: (503) 228 -7688 O , y y GALV GALVANIZED) PROJ PROJECT ® AT FAX: (503) 233 -6083 "'F y� � � y • TELEPHONE UTILITY: GTE OPERATIONS , TEL (503) 590-1233 CONSTRUCTION DATE - GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR PROP PROPERTY 9 �� F� TO LAKE OSWEGO TITLE SHEET Pr PRESSURE TREATED NUMBER r� D ATE CONTACT: JAMES W. JOHNSON P.E. - G TEL: (503) 620 -5943 REAL ESTATE DATE OVERALL SITE PLA\ REVISION 100 ROOM NUMBER FOUNDATION ENGINEER VICINITY M A P 1. FIRE DEPARTMENT: TIJAI_ITIN VALLEY AND RESCUE RF ENGINEER _ __ — 2 KEY ED NOTE TEL: (503) 649 -8571 G E \ ERAL i \ FO U-. KEY NOTE ZONING � DATE ' , � THE FOUNDATION ENGINEERING GENERAL INFORMATION: LANDLORD © WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE TOWER MANUFACTURER N - DATE DETAIL REFERENCE © SECTION REFERENCE mil' 1. PARKING . REQUIREMENTS ARE UNCHANG >~ SHEET NUMBER ` 2, TRAFFIC IS UNAFFECTED .^ DATE " ; r ,, © 3. N SIGNAGE IS PROPOSED - DATE � ELEVATION REFERENCE 4. MINOR SITE GRADING WILL NOT BE IN EXCESS OF 50 CU.YDSS. E (MAP SOURCE: THOMAS GUIDE - 1994 ED. _ T-1 ABBREVIATIONS 86 SYvIBOLS CONSULTANT T AM VICINITY MAP PAGE 655 ,GRID F /3) N.T.s. PROJECT SU vl yIARY APPROVALS -- - - PLOT SCALE: 1" = 1" , ''' /` a TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TO BEAVERTON wes tern OF TAX LOTS 2000 AND 2100 m c).; 4 K p cs cor IN 9 S.W. 1 /4, SECTION 36, T. 1 S., R. 1 W., W.M., _ �`, 7535 PHO NE AMBA(5) 3) 284 -2255 SSADOR PL., SUITE B CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON PFAFFLE ST (i'V* PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 Q •� ���P�� MAP ^ FAX (503) 284 -0402 90 /c' (4c9\c',..--- o : . 100, o Z FF�0 SITE A ll 6 k ti ' \V / "" r t7 ✓�, ` p,G� �Fy ' s REGISTERED 0\ /- �O , / S t) y N.T.S. PROFESSIONAL ? P i __________ - � a LAND SURVEYOR 6 TRU co S0O J 1 %1 : , L iL ., ----- - c,) . s,.\ , O O REGON ! k f ' " C' J 30, 1076 a : i , 0 37 M gGN b y 1 a EDGAR R. COOK --- , . , � �; i -` / / ' �/ t ' Oy ' u { =� E TIC � �� Zi k FR LAKE 1073 31 / 97 th ,, � � E OSWEGO RENEWAL / ,--'---- : : ---- - --- - - . 1 8 12 , , 220 POB) NIG . . Q � , VICINITY MAP -- - • � (NORTHEAST CORNER � -- - - -- P — PALMER TRACT) X / " �/' i %% DATE / / BASED ON DEED ' ' POB / f , � f / 0 15 30 60 REVISIONS S c� i PARCEL,'I o�0\'`-‘ cep i j �� - ^ /; / - ` / 7 ' r NO DATE ISSUE / / �n � �•, I 3.05 -_ % A 5/06/96 PRELIMINARY J i' c: I 1 _- —_ - 35 JO \JG r+ / :_ is T 2 /2\ 5/17/96 ADDED LEASE AREA i 1 \ :i / °C \ i\ -,.r / .,,- :�' ! , '/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARENT PARCEL: LEGAL DESCRIPTION — LEASE AREA: _, A 'S ; , \ L ; '�, 0 ` ; � - % - i � • Y / // PARCEL I: A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, ' '' , _P , -\ = \ ' 3/8" IRON Rd i ' ` 1/7 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIA � 7 N 0 41 29 W , - _ _ ,i r THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF /6\ iL 1 ,____- _ ,% , V 4 j / - - -. - -- - - - - - IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST OF THE THAT PARCEL CONVEYED TO RALPH L. PALMER AND ELMA E. PALMER /� ' - .,_-- �\' � - -�n d - - i Ni , � '� WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, TO -WIT: BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 251, PAGE 759, WASHINGTON COUNTY / /\ ________ ..- 'll ' ' ! - -\ — I i qp J I DEED RECORDS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: J i i" — �-- •• P � i Ott , BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF ■ 5 8" IRON ROD WITH / ' k 2 1 0 N �/ % / ifi ;1 ' LAND IN THE GEORGE RICHARDSON DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 55, BEGINNING AT A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD ON THE EAST LINE OF AND / , 2k 'N d- ., , SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE SOUTH 00' 08' 00" EAST 234.20 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST I 1 -1 2" ALUMINUM OREGON CONVEYED TO RALPH L. CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 89' 41' 07" WEST 72.57 � � "OSHD" CAP ;' ;�� ; %,�,(J'. � � ��'�� \� ! � i� ; - ' �r � ' - - ; % MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, � \ 1 / ` ' PALMER AND ELMA E. PALMER BY DEED RECORDED ON PAGE 759 OF FEET TO AN IRON ROD ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY OF OREGON / -i 7 --- - , ''` ; ` % 1 ` " - �` l } � `� J /�'� � � �I ; : J -T BOOK 251, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS; AND RUNNING THENCE HIGHWAY 217; THENCE SOUTH 50' 40' 48" EAST ALONG SAID i � * \ o / SSII �I r ' ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE PALMER TRACT SOUTH 0 08 EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY 94.03 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD ON THE EAST i �? �� - /� ) r ' 39.4 FEET TO AN IRON ROD SET SOUTH 52' 23' WEST 25.0 FEET LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE NORTH 00' 08' 00" WEST 60.00 l� ; i / o L X I / - 1- 1 t 1 V • ' ' i / \ / / i ' ' � i � \ I '�l L - /? - f 1 1 � / f i ' I �/ // ; ' , ' I ' � ' - OF RECORD; _t- . =C FROM THE N ORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF TWIN OAKS LANE, A PLAT FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.05 ACRES MORE is i / / ' - Z THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE OR LESS. !, \ \ ; i i I 1 rI /I% ' 1 i j ; / / ; , ; PALMEIR TRACT SOUTH 0' 08 EAST 194.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD `� . } � - -__� j �, \ ;' / ! / i; r ;' r •_C WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREINAFTER / / r; DESCRIBED; THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING RUNNING '0 ` \ ' l \ \ } \ ? 6' 6 ' � �. - , , // ; / , ; 1 - = -- SOUTH 89' 43' WEST 192.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTH ` DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ,} \ ' \ \ ' J •. I 1 I ' I ' :_: 0' 08' EAST 154.0 FEET TO AN IRON ROD ON THE SOUTH LINE O " r _ \ \ � ------ ' I ' I 1 ; 1 r -- THE PALMER TRACT NORTH 89' 43' EAST 100 FEET FROM THE •� 1 ^ -•rte- i' - / J I J 1 1 \ 4 SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE FOLLOWING SAID SOUTH LINE, • \ \ ( (S 89 43 W 72.8 ■ ( 1 1 NORTH 89' 43' EAST 192.8 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF \ '\5/ " IRO � -� Z_-.-LL ._ / ; r THE PALMER TRACT; THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST 154.0 FEET TO \ l ` \ \ / - �. . ( \ THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT \ \ \ \ /..-- , LEA / i PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON, BY AND \ , ` , ! i I A • o j l I -° r PARCEL I THROUGH ITS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, BY DEED RECORDED \ , ' I ! I ° i 1 i 1 5 8 IRON ROD JANUARY 3, 1964, IN BOOK 503, PAGE 463, WASHINGTON COUNTY � , I I 1 I 9 � -- i l ' / POB O o 1-\ , RECORDS. \ l 1 I j \ ,� • r I ( . 0 . 3 BELO SURFACE 1 1 X "\ ./ B , t i \W ` - -__� a ; ALSO BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT N I 1 � _ ' _ __ OF LAND IN THE GEORGE RICHARDSON D.L.C. #55 IN SECTION 36, \ ` ` � ` \ � / J � 1 i T1S R1W W.M. WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON CONVEYED 1. CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE 1 FOOT. , ' C ELANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS LATITUDE 45' 26 06.206 LPH ;� � L. PALMER AND ELMA E. PALMER BY DEED RECORDED ON PAGE 759 OF f Si , OR 97201 (503)223 -6663 LONGITUDE 122' 45' 33.305" ' � a BOOK 251, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON DEED RECORDS, AND 2. ALL ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE BASED UPON z \ I / a RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE PALMER TRACT, G.S. VERTICAL DATUM N.G.V.D 29 1947 ADJUSTMENT. LEGEND \ \ `" f 5/8" IRON ROD SOUTH 0' 08' EAST 39.4 FEET TO AN IRON ROD SET SOUTH 52' 3. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE ARE BASED ON NAD83, 1991 2E. FE FE TO ORAN TST ADJUSTMENT. FIRE HYDRANT ; ; ;; z TW3SOUT' WH IN O S 2508' LA NE, EAST E A T 194 SBDROM U IVISION N OF RECORD; C THENCE RUNNING OF CONTINUING LOT 1, OF ' FEET TH HW IR E ON ROD; ORNER I._. ° m THENCE SOUTH 89' 43' WEST 72.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; RUNNING THENCE PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF THE PALMER TRACT 4. THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS I SITE NAME I • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED I BASED ON A LESSEE PROPERTY REPORT PROVIDED I 19.8 ROAD NORTH 0' 08' WEST 142.4 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; THENCE BY WESTERN AMERICAN PROPERTY RESEARCH COMPANY. ® GAS VALVE —•-I EASEMENT c� THE LESSEE PROPERTY REPORT DOES NOT INCLUDE CONTINIUING NORTH 0' 08 WEST 36.2 FEET TO A POINT ON THE PRIVATE) c? NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PALMER TRACT; THENCE NORTH 52' 23' SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION c c 1 GUY WIRE ANCHOR ( o EAST 91.7 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO THE DEA IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BOUNDARY R ti IGHTS OF THE PUBLIC OF ALL PORTIONS LYING WITHIN PUBLIC E E N V RG 0 DISCREPANCIES THAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL' 0 MAILBOX "4- RECORDS. INFORMATION INCLUDED IN A TITLE REPORT. 0 co SITE NUMBER I -0- POWER POLE rn PARCEL II: 5. OWNER: HANS H. AND MARILYN K GR UNBAUM o U •) POWER VAULT A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, ki 6. PARCEL NUMBER: R0284105 AND R0284098 ~' TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN I 1373 -B Y Q SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE L ; ;; WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT I o OF LAND CONVEYED TO RALPH L. PALMER, ET UX, BY DEED RECORDED WATER METER I IN BOOK 251, PAGE 759, DEED RECORDS: I SITE ADDRESS I o o CURB LINE BEGINNIING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PALMER TRACT AND it i , ;, : :i1 ,1, 4'''''*'''s < RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PALMER TRACT ---T--- ' ' DITCH LINE y SOUTH 52' 23' WEST 91.7 FEET TO A POINT, WHICH IS ALSO THE 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY o - --- EASEMENT LINE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO JOHN TIGARD, OREGON 97223 m METCALF, ET UX, BY DEED RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 367, PAGE 610, I cV EDGE OF GRAVEL LINE WHICH IS ALSO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT LO .cam HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 0' 08' EAST ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID METCALF TRACT 178.6 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST APPROVED BY: DATE: gt ii 0 v v EDGE OF PAVEMENT LINE CORNER THEREOF ON THE NORTH LINE OF THAT TRACT CONVEYED TO 00 \ ROBERT H. CANDLISH, ET UX, B Y DEED RECORDED AT PAGE 141 OF OWNER I SHEET TITLE 0 LEASE BOUNDARY LINE ti 5/8" IRON ROD WITH DEED BOOK 384; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THAT TRACT _ OHP OVERHEAD POWER LINE 1 -1/2" ALUMINUM CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON, BY AND THROUGH ITS HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY "OSHD" CAP COMMISSION BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 516, PAGE 341 NORTH 32' 38' 32" WEST 127.61 FEET TO 5/8 INCH IRON ROD ON THE OPERATIONS 4 OHT OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE EAST LINE OF THAT TRACT CONVEYED TO FRANK STALICK AS ° — — PROPERTY LINE RECORDED AT PAGE 423 OF DEED BOOK 352; THENCE NORTH 0' 41' REAL ESTATE 29" WEST ON LAST SAID EAST LINE 1.86 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF X POB POINT OF BEGINNING RADIUS LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 99W AT A POINT ON A CURVE WHOSE ZONING m RADIUS IS 1472.4 FEET; THENCE ON SAID CURVE LEFT AN ARC = SHEET UMB NER ( ) RECORD DATA PER DEED DISTANCE OF 78.78 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3' 03' RF ENGINEERING 55" TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID METCALF TRACT, NORTH 0' 08' WEST 3.35 FEET FROM A 3/8 INCH ROD; THENCE NORTH V. S-1 % o [ ] RECORD DATA PER COUNTY SURVEY 17161 0' 08' WEST 32.97 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF : 4` o BEGINNING. U s I SCALE: 1" = 30'1 � J � I •- I western • . . 4 I 7535 NE AMBASSADOR PL., SUITE B \ / \ PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 • PHONE (503) 284 -2255 • 0 FAX (503) 284 -0402 0 0 i' I I I HNIIII I I ill il lil l iiims.__ i I I fi. 3 �-- AVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. el • Ilk (1111101 _ +. -Nb1,04 \ilik 4.4_,_ _____■ --_-- R 1 # TO Iti- aR L L J DeDin _ ..� �O� � . ® lr m® ;. . wro PIANISM � w +v l ++o�[u+, ARCHITECTS • , ,,y, \ , . MIMI' WW1 NEM SWIM ININIIII MINN . 7c . x - '� ir. x x x s.>r. caRM MU , OR orao>t (504223-6663 0 1 \ 0 \ \ \ , \ DATE 5/21/96 (I) Ti Rf #3 TO BE R_ •_R ED REVISIONS NO. DATE ISSUE \ %\%‘ x 6 PERMIT ISSUE Q2 9/6/96 CITY COMMENTS 0 � 1.- _ N■N 6 ' < N li 9 !rim '7 - --- \ . 1 / 11 411N , 1 i pop T Nz■„.. A , ____ ":„:::,.„,,,,,", „,„„":„,"::,,,,,::::, ,, ,, a --\ -U."''', / 1 N 404' ) _ _I ---- / . (//: / ' N7 Sk NN / \ \ - W/5--- / ,i ,/ AN 1 J ( / w ' N I f- . *illilit ( 8 ) BELEVAY OS! A\TI US I cliiik _ -( A N } kilt \\ :: ip, t..% _de 4 WO , . ,,:„.,,r ,. LEONAF:0 ' - 9-- T H JA P L I A TA � PO�> rI:� �, o ,r<Gu� �. TR S TO R - AI \ i co ‘1[11P46111'N , J� � 1 SITE NAME I X 441, 4 III • r • GREENSURG \ SITE NUMBER o a Po- 1373 -B 0 / ------\ r( / o SITE ADDRESS . t 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY PLANT I N G L I ST TIGARD, OREGON 97223 BOTAN I CAL COMMON . QUANTITY NAME NAME SIZE CONDITION REMARKS 8 OSMANTHUS DELAVAYI DELAVAY OSMANTHUS 2 GAL CONTAINER SHEET TITLE PER SPCNG ARCTOSAPHYLOS UVA—URSI K I N N I K I N N I C K 4" POT CONTAINER 18" OC TRIANGULAR SPACING 3 THUJA PL I CATA WESTERN RED CEDAR IN B & B HEALTHY AND SYMETR I CAL PLANT' \G PLA\ NOTE: MINIMUM 6" NEW IMPORTED TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED I N ALL PLANTING AREAS AFTER PLANTING SPREAD 4" OF MUSHROOM COMPOST OVER ALL PLANTING BEDS • AREA OF NEW LANDSCAPING IS 17% OF LEASE AREA ' ¢ SHEET NUMBER AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (EQUIP. PADS & MONOPOLE BASE) I S 10% OF LEASE AREA L -1 PLANTING PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1' -0" :. PLOT SCALE: 1" = 1" • • m western ... } pcs corp. NOTE: WHERE NECESSARY DUE TO SOIL SITE 7535 NE AMBASSADOR PL. SUITE B CONDITIONS; REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL te a_ __ —_ -_ GRADE SITE WITH CROWN FROM CENTER OF P O R l LAND , OREGON 9 7 220 • AND REPLACE WITH 4 -6" OF 1 -1/2' CRUSHED SITE AS INDICATED; SLOPE TO ALL EDGES ROCK COMPACTED WITH TO 905 T ENGINEERED PRIOR OF SfTE PERIMETER AT 2.55 PHONE (503) 284 -2255 - - -- (3) DIRECTIONAL PANEL ANTENNAS, FILL. REVIEW wITH PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR EACH SIDE OF ANTENNA PLATFORM; 10 CONSTRUCTION FAX (503) 284 -0402 (9) ANTENNAS TOTAL I ELECTRICAL/TELCO EQUIPMENT CABINET - - - MONOPOLE; SEE MOUNTED TO 3'x3'x4" CONCRETE PAD SITE PLAN FOR HEIGHT PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS ANTENNA PLATFORM TOP OF ANTENNA _ 1 r - I I i --I CABLE BRIDGE 3 ' -5 • 12° 6' HIGH CHAIN -LINK FENCE F I —�� M I CONCRETE EQUIP. PAD TOP 0 TOW =R PROJECT AREA BOU NDARY LINE — --I COAX TERM FRAM I I \ _ , I I FINISH SITE WITH 4' OF 5/6"x1/4' __',' I. J b .. 1. CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK WITH NO FINES, APPLY OVER GRADED, EQUIPMENT CABINETS I COMPACTED SITE 0/ FILTER FABRIC Cq (INSTALLED BY OTHERS) 8 THK C.LP. CONC RETANING WA r1 F - -- FUTURE 2' DIA. _ SI _ I TEM AND FTG MAX HEIGHT I LL k DISH ANTENNA _„ 2 W /Q4 ®12' O.C. EA WAY 'MT IN r I L 200.0 S ( ti 8° THK C CONC RETAINING WALL _- _ ' - _ _ - T -! --i r ....,-, - r - -- ,- = -- -_ - j L i r i I - �I I „. le . i STEND FTG - MAX HEIGHT 6-0' 1 Tic k I -T 1i ill III Ill� II II- ,17I�I1 I4 �� _ _ DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. _ -1 -1� _ill 1= —1 ] i — _Il' -;Ii -IL _Ii -,.-„ �1 i� 11 - I�= i= . E=li ; i allI I L, 9$ -- = _ j IllerM / 130 MONOPOLE L 1, II ��I AILI. i I�li I ,,::�11 l�_ 1: 1 - iII ;llli, _1I -yl --,- 71 REAT GRADED SITE WITH APPROVED ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS / 14 1 ll� - WEED BARRIER PRIOR TO GRAVEL FINISH /// 4, II 1_ H 41 1 -11 l a l -1 i1� I� T q�i l ± _ L - 1 I Lei,, `� '� 2828 S.K. CORBETT AVENUE PORTEND, OR 97201 (503 }223 6669 i k-I I I I1 � r t , 1�1 � I l, L:3. I I - fll__ I 1 II 4ll n EXCAVATE AN NECESSARY TO - n _; _ GRUB SITE; REMOVE SOD, ROOTS ., I AND ALL UNSUITABLE SOIL FROM �__�� - `1, I 7— PROJECT AREA —J USE SELECTED FILL AND GRADE SITE WITH CROWN AS EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL - 8” 8 2'8" 1 - -- — .1— L INDICATED; COMPACT TO 907 L L> � TOWER TOUTING - r • PER MANUFACTURER'S DNGS. I DATE 5/23/96 -I -I 0 • I HH 2 REVISIONS "' 1 1 - EN, NO. DATE ISSUE • . • w J TYDICAI__ SITE SECT 101\1 1' SCALE: 1/4" = —0" Z A 6/26/96 PERMIT ISSUE = `� /2 9/6/96 CITY COMMENTS CD Q z 0 X Q • • • ROUTE OF - - UNDERGROUND UTILITIES • SEE ELECT. CINGS \ - _ — __ ____ - - — \ ...i:HE LEASE — — —' —=— _— X X X 3( X X X U • \N \ I ♦�\ \ ©ACCESPATH - - � - • \\ \ x \\ \ � in \ � f 3' 0' 14'--0 13' O' 12" N -- - -- - - - - - - -- — ♦., \ ELECTRICAL_ /TELCO EQUIPMENT PAD N\\N \ SEQEISIHEET S ©RT BOARD f 2' 0 ° , _ 1O' D f 2' 0 " B' 3' TO' 8' 6' (1) DIRECTIONAL • \ EQUIPMENT TOWER CENTER P EN A; • • \\ \ N GALE ANTENNA PLATFORM • • \ \ (3) ANTEN TOTAL I— \ \ \ I FOUNDATION LION OWER e ' i 1 130' MONOPOLE; SEE r SJ, � • \ CE OF PIPE /CONDUIT ELEVATIONS THIS SHEET V C ' ' • AZIMUTH, 0 T IZIJE NORTH) `� ` ANTENNA PLATFORM AT ( ) \ \ I \ , I I PORTLAND; OREGON 0 BE ORIENTATED 15' 10 TRUE NORTH. , ._ NOTE: ONE ANTENNA STANDOF F ARM \\ \ ` - -- - -- - •� I I I TOP OF MONOPOLE; lO \ ° O 1 �� SEE SHEET • : . '"� ',Y, : ?l ` alt 00 I 1:17 -I \'N\ \ N ,?3-s? - X :; ` — \ Q. TOWER CENTER ..... .. :. NIN., W -::::.::::.:,:::.:..:::::::* S T i�. '�, ` ' : .# iT ': h• „ : \ R p 7 :, 8" THK C.I.P. CONC RETAINING \ °w \1 I 3 I I I WALL, SEE SHEET 3 \ , o I 1 A.1 o a � \ ` ► I I I SITE NAME I \ \ / I I L \ N. — UTILITY CONDUIT IN SLAB, J N SEE ELECT. DWGS I [ NUMBER . EQUIPMENT CA61NEFS MOUNTED 10 © PROPSED VEY CABLE BRIDGE — PROPOSED 6' HIGH CONCRETE PAD; 6Y or,;FPS CONCRLIE 7UIP. F'AO ♦ 3 STRAND BARB WIRE AT TOP; 1 FENCE W /12" OF 3 SEE SHLEF ! i � - STRAND BARB WIRE ':' \ FENCE; 6 HIGH WITH 12" FUTURE ENCLOSURE e,.._ \ CONSTRUCT ATOP BLOCK RTNG WALL ` G \ TYP. (4) SIDES; SEE SHEET (4) PROPOSED EQUIPMENT — — __ SE ' Sii`tE7 --9 \ \ [ SITE ADDRESS CABINETS � o r_ _= 3 - -- -- ' �= _ _ - - -_ �� ♦ WNW uf1JRi PIPE ICR � T : � • `. T ` ti .• 'A; W� ,�ti . La CABLE r -i,DGE (TYP) NN 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY En -- _— _- - -_ - -- - - -_ _- - ___ -__ __— -- 111) { � / S: i�.: :itra. ' ,r te N r _ - - �'. '; by ` ` '`` ti . . `` �; � ♦�. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 . x t `' EXIST. GRADE �ti• ti'••,r s, ♦ ' .ti • ,,`�,�� � � �� � �: TOP OF a #. r :?;*.S'fs '. ' y `C• '. '���.}� + ''�, - --- - - - -- -- -- ASSUMED I 'R CONC. EL. 00.0' Ili ‘ \ SHEET TITLE \ L — –_ -- - '_] -7 EXT R10 EL= VATIO \S CMU RTNG WALL — \ N _ \ LA -- G E D SIT- PLA\ . . \ - -\ - - - -- - -- - N SITE SECTIO\ N SHEET NUMBER ED . . A _ ______. •______ _____ ____ • ..._ SO"TH ELEVAT 0\ SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0" 1 EAST ELEVATIO\ SCALE: 1/8" = 1' -0" 2 E \L.ARCED S TE PLA\ SCALE: 3/16" = 1' -0" 4 I SCALE: 1 =1 Q000- biflJ rII Igo - nDMIW • A.4.- A CITY OF TIGARD May 9, 2002 ALE Ci ff OREGON • Ed Fournier 25977 SW Canyon Creek Road Wilsonville, OR 97070 RE: Minor Modification Request of CUP96 -0006, Case File No. MMD2002 -00008 Dear Mr. Fournier: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification (MMD2002- 00008) of the approved site development and conditional use permit located at 11744 SW Pacific Highway, WCTM 1 S136CC, Tax Lot 02100. You have requested to add additional antenna array and associated equipment cabinets to the existing monopole. The submitted site and elevation plans reflect the current conditions and proposed additions. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter, states; "any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential property. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The proposed wireless communication facility is not required to provide any parking, pursuant to the parking demand table in TDC 18.765. Therefore, no additional on -site parking is needed. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the structure is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has proposed to establish the new antennae at 100 feet above ground level on the 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 - " • • existing 130 foot pole. No increase to the pole height is proposed. Therefore, this standard is met. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected. No changes to the site layout or accesses are proposed, therefore this criterion is satisfied. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. The existing and proposed conditional uses are similar in nature in terms of traffic generation, approximately 1 trip per month. This modification will double that trip generation to 2 trips per month, significantly below the 100 trip per day threshold. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non - residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposal will add impervious area where the concrete pad for the equipment cabinets will be located. This expansion is approximately 150 square feet, below the 5,000 square foot limitation. The expansion will also occur within the established fence enclosure. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and /or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. There is no common open space required for this type of development, therefore this standard does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and /or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. There are no specific amenities provided by the existing development. The amount of landscaping exceeds the 15% minimum required in this zone. Therefore this criterion is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. The site was developed prior to the present Wireless Communications Facility Ordinance (TDC 18.798) and was approved through a conditional use process, CUP 96 -0006. The conditions of that approval are as follows: 1. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE LIGHTING ON THE PROPOSED TOWER WITH A DUAL FITTED RED OBSTRUCTION LIGHT MOUNTED ON TOP OF THE STRUCTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL AVIATION ADVISORY CIRCULAR 70/7460, CHAPTERS 4, 5, AND 13. Lighting was installed, and is not affected by the present proposal. 2. THE APPLICANT SHALL OBTAIN A PERMIT FROM THE STATE OF OREGON HIGHWAY DIVISION, FOR THE NEW DRIVEWAY TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE FRONTAGE ROAD THAT PROVIDES ACCESS TO SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONSTRUCT A MINIMUM OF A 20- FOOT PAVED DRIVEWAY FROM THE EDGE OF THE EXISTING FRONTAGE ROAD. A COPY OF THE PERMIT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION. This condition was apparently never satisfied, leaving the site in technical non- compliance. The present applicant has applied for the ODOT approach permit as evidenced by the materials in the application. As this condition remains outstanding, the applicant will not be able to obtain electrical /building permits until evidence that an approach permit has been obtained from ODOT is provided. Page 2 of 3 ... . • I 3. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE CALCULATIONS CONCERNING THE PERCENTAGE OF LANDSCAPING TO IMPERVIOUS SURFACE TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE LEASEHOLD AREA. This condition was satisfied previously with the original development. The total lease area is 30x30 or 900 square feet. The two concrete pads total 262 square feet, or 29 %. This exceeds the 15% landscaping requirement. 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL REVIEW THE OPTION OF REALIGNING THE PROPOSED GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AND THE FENCING WITH THE ARBORIST IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE THREE TREES THAT HAVE BEEN FOUND TO BE HEALTHY. WHERE IT IS NOT FOUND TO BE POSSIBLE TO PRESERVE THESE TREES, SECTION 18.150.070.D REQUIRES A MITIGATION PROGRAM SO THAT THERE IS NO NET LOSS OF CALIPER INCHES WHERE A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL IS TO RETAIN LESS THAN 25 PERCENT OF THE EXISTING TREES. THE PLAN SHALL MITIGATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CALIPER INCHES OF HEALTHY TREES THAT ARE LOST. The present request will not affect any trees on site. The applicant has included an arborist report and assessment of the tree located within the lease enclosure area to ensure it's long term viability. If the tree protection measures as specified in that report are followed, the tree should remain viable. As the above conditions are not adversely impacted, this criterion is satisfied. THIS REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. Limitations on Minor Modification Approval The applicant must submit evidence that an ODOT approach permit has been obtained prior to issuance of electrical and building permits. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639 -4171 ext. 407. Sincerely, Morgan Tracy Associate Planner \ \tig333 \usr \depts \curpin \morgan \workspace \sdr\mmd2002 -00008 (cingular carbucks).doc Page 3 of 3 N iR P O R A T I O N April 30, 2002 Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Salmon PCS; Minor Modification Application Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Salmon PCS, I am submitting the following Application for a Minor Modification to a CUP to collocate upon an existing mono -pole and place equipment in an existing fenced equipment compound located at 11744 SW Pacific Highway. Please find enclosed five copies of the following: • Minor Modification Application form • Applicant's Statement • Site Plans • Owner's Written Authorization — Copy of a Letter of Authorization & Deed /y►�ss� •�y • CWS Service Provider Letter l • ODOT Approach Permit Application E_ 14,50,15 • ArlOofl4 - p, - -' (no tv,ta - Please find enclosed one copy of the following: • 8.5" x 11" Site Plan • Filing Fee: a check for $100.00 is enclosed Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, MERICO . ORPORATION Edward (Ed ournier Senior Project Manager Direct Line: 503/303 -3012 E -Mail: Ed.Fournier @Mericom.com 25977 SW CANYON CREEK ROAD, SUITE E, WILSONVILLE, OREGON 97070, U.S.A. TELEPHONE: (503) 303 -3000 / FAX: (503) 303 -3001 • t • • 0 .4 f • 1 , A MINOR MOD IFICATION � � i , ,w.,,.,,.,� iii, TYPE I APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 FAX: (503) 684 -7297 GENERAL INFORMATION • 11744 SW PAcific Highway • Property Address/Location(s): - . . " • • ' • • FOF�'S_STA> -USi =_ONLY . Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): 1 s136cc02100 • Case :Nb�s,): ; .. l� "Ate ' rift ?_r� Site Size: 900 SF enclosure as part of a .32 Aearcel -: C),Hiet•bso(s): • .. Salmon PCS LLC; Mericoncorp as Agent a '� �i' ' J. � Applicant*. ..R �d:: 9!!: nt p.= • 2 SW Can Ck Rd., E y • Address: : AApplica_t4n� ±W;c*ptedli.' AZ • . Wilsonville OR Zi 97070 r City/State: °'t`�arte:... ry >: :;...,•.:..1� • I I e.......,.:.. Primary Contact: Ed Fournier ' • 503 - 303 -3012 Fax: 503 - 303 -3001 Phone: .. ' • [riate' DettraninatKedrnpletiii ; _� •:.., • .. Property OwnerlDeed Holder(s)': (Attach list if more than one) ; •• . -'- ' # " � is �Prnf�oM'wtl!m$!; Hans & Marilyn Grunbaum 21390 SW Edv Road Address: Phone: -7171 p: 97140 ' City /State: Sherwood, OR zip: — • • When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS UI REQRED MENTS must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written REQUIRED RED cations will not be MENTS authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) acce must sign this appliction in the space provided on the back of this without the required submittal elements) form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY I El Application Form . The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a ! O Signature/Written Authorization Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor ®/ Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not Title Transfer Instrument or Deed invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification 6/Site Development Plan (3 copies) exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the following criteria, a Major Modification review manner r a uir new Major J' Site/Plot Plan (reduced 8'1 "x 11") • Modifications are processed in the same / Applicant's Statement (3 copies) Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the 0 ( P ) • criteria'below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed (Addressing Criteria Und r response to each criteria. (]/Filing Fee (City) $100.00 G • I. An Increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for - residential development (Urban) $236:00 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. In addition, the Director must find that the 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20% osed change complies with the underlying 6. A change in the type and location of acassways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be sta ndards of the a com applic zoning district. Tc a n inc er this the Applicant's proposa 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 must a discussion indicating how the vehicles es per r day. • B. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non - residential use by more than 10% excluding site inimum setback, kl continue ding h co parking comply lahc xp expansions under square feet landscaping standards. Other 'applicable 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the P 9 open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more requirements neasriveways and s teat utters Visio than ten percent also be a licable de endin on when n 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) may ex is prop osed to b� below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where spedfied in the site plan the building expansion P P I. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not constructed on the site. APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as [described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: teed es s h.t • .e . acte. t•-• 'a .os•. .o : s b' ct ♦ ,boy: . • _ e toes of i.a = •� RLo • If the application is granted,. the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. ♦ The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this day of . 20 • • .fie A rTAG 40 e tzi24 ibN Owner's Signature • Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature • • • • Applicants Statement — Project Overview VoiceStream has an existing 130' mono pole upon the property with an existing 30' x 33' fenced enclosure, permitted via CUP 96- 00006. Salmon PCS, LLC (Salmon) proposes collocation upon the pole with 2 antennas per sector attached onto the existing mono -pole at an elevation of 100'. The proposed installation consists of installing 3 small equipment cabinets approximately (30 "x30 "x60" tall) that will be located upon a concrete pad. As call volume increases at the site additional cabinets may be added. As the proposed development shall occur entirely within the area leased from the land owner to Voicestream, a copy of the entry and Testing agreement signed by VoiceStream is enclosed as written authorization for this land use application. Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing roadway from SW Pacific Highway. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. Telephone service and electrical power are the only public facilities required by the proposed site, and are available at the site. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. The proposed communication facility will not interfere with surrounding properties or their uses, and will not cause interference with any electronic equipment, such as telephones, televisions, or radios. Non - interference is ensured by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulation of radio transmissions. Salmon PCS Technology Similar to cellular technology, Salmon systems use "cells" or geographic coverage areas that resemble a honeycomb pattern to provide service. Typically, one antenna fixture and a base station area located within each cell area. The base station is comprised of equipment cabinets about the size of small refrigerators. The wireless PCS digital technology is emerging as a necessary emergency service and business tool, as well as a convenience for personal and family use. PCS will provide two -way mobile voice communication, two -way paging /short message service, data transmission, voice mail, and conference calling through compact devices. The new digital technology also produces a higher quality transfer of voice and data than the analog /digital hybrid systems currently in use by the cellular carriers. System Information Salmon, a Cingular Wireless affiliate, is currently developing a digital PCS (Personal Communications System) throughout Oregon. Upon completion of this network, Salmon will operate a state of the art digital network of wireless communication sites throughout Oregon, and in connection with other nationwide Cingular market areas. Mericom Corporation (Mericom) is responsible for the development of many of the Salmon sites and provides a broad range of professional services; to include program management, land use planning, site acquisition, construction management, and technical services. Mericom, on behalf of Salmon, has submitted this application. The proposed use would allow Salmon to provide the needed service to the surrounding community and to this heavily traveled portion of Highway 99W. The need for specific service is determined by market demand, capacity requirements for a specific geographic area, and the need to provide continuous coverage from one site to another in a particular geographic region. Once the need for additional capacity or enhanced coverage in a particular area has been established, Salmon's Radio Frequency (RF) engineers identify a target area ( "search ring ") to locate a new facility. The required site location and antenna height is determined by an engineering study. This study evaluates radio signal propagation over the desired coverage area based on topography, geographic features and possible signal • • attenuation due to seasonal changes in vegetation. It is desirable to have direct line of sight from the base station antennas to the required coverage objectives. Based on the topography and the amount of traffic in the servicing area, Salmon's RF engineers determined that the above listed antenna elevation upon the existing tower would enable them to meet their coverage objectives. It is crucial for Salmon to have adequate coverage in this area in order to serve customers in compliance with its FCC license regulations. Other specifics of the proposed installation are addressed on the enclosed site plan and responses to applicable Code Sections including 18.798.050. • • CONDITIONAL USES (Chapter 18.330) Per Chapter 18.330.20.C, the application meets the criteria of a Minor modification to a CUP. The applicant has submitted the required forms and other submittal elements for City approval of this request via a Type I procedure. 18.330.030 Approval Standards and Conditions of Approval A. Approval standards. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; The proposed development does not modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. This criteria was addressed and met via the original CUP. 2. The impacts of the proposed use of the site can be accommodated considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; There shall be no adverse impact to the property or surrounding land uses by the proposed development. The proposed development does not modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. This criteria was addressed and met via the original CUP. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing roadway from SW Pacific Highway. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; The underlying zoning district criteria have been met and are further detailed in the narrative section regarding Chapter 18.520. The proposed development does not modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. This criteria was addressed and met via the original CUP. 5. The applicable requirements of 18.330.050; and 18.330.050Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types 16. Emergency Services and Basic Utilities: a. Minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet; This lot is .32 acres in size and exceeds the Chapter requirements. b. Minimum setbacks shall be those in the applicable zone; This existing mono -pole was approved via a CUP permitting the pole location and height. The proposed development does not modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. The CG code allows for setbacks of 0', which are exceeded by this development. c. Height limitation shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.730; This existing mono -pole was approved via a CUP permitting the pole location and height. The proposed development does not modify the existing compound area nor mono -pole. d. Off - street parking and loading requirement shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.765; and • • No specific requirements for wireless communications facilities are listed in Chapter 18.765. This criteria was addressed and approved via the existing CUP. The proposed development does not modify the existing development. e. Screening shall be in accordance with Chapter 18.745. This existing mono -pole and equipment compound was approved via a CUP. The proposed development does not modify the existing compound area and none of the existing landscaping is being impacted by the proposed development. 6. The supplementary requirements set forth in other chapters of this code including but not limited to Chapter 18.780, Signs, and Chapter 18.360, Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. Other applicable Chapters are discussed in this narrative. This development is not subject to Chapter 18.780, as no site signs are proposed, and Chapter 18.360 is not applicable as the only application for this proposed development is for a Minor Modification to an existing CUP via a Type I application. IMPACT STUDY (Chapter 18.390) Impact to public facilities and services will be minimal. Access shall be via the existing access roadway from Highway 99W. During construction or operation of the site, minimal traffic would be generated as a result of the facility. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. Telephone service and electrical power are the only public facilities required by the proposed site, and will be arranged with the local private utility companies. Salmon's proposed site is an unmanned facility, and would not require any water, waste treatment or management of hazardous materials. No improvements to public facilities are needed to accommodate this development. COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Chapter 18.520) In general this Chapter described allowable uses in Commercial Districts. Specifically, Chapter 18.520.030 (Table 18.520.1) lists Wireless Communications Facilities as a Permitted use, subject to Chapter 18.798. Table 18.520.2 lists numerical criteria for this District. While the proposed mono -pole development is specifically subject to Chapter 18.798, but please note that, the existing mono -pole met the setback requirements via the original CUP. This development does not propose modification of the equipment compound or the existing landscaping nor site coverage percentages. Only the height of the proposed mono -pole (130') exceeds the underlying Zoning District (CG) requirements of 45' maximum. However, this height is permitted by the original CUP. Chapter 18.520.60 lists no additional criteria or guidelines for the CG Zone. ACCESS (Chapter 18.705 ) The parcel is currently developed as a small office building and a VoiceStream mono -pole facility. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the CUP with the original development. No changes to the previously approved access is proposed. The Applicant is in the process of obtaining the needed ODOT Approach Permit. A copy of the permit, applicable site sketch and application fee are attached as evidence thereof. As Applicant has been informed by an ODOT representative that this process can range up to 90 days for ODOT approval, it is requested that this Minor Modification Application be approved, and subject to obtaining final approval of the ODOT Permit. Current requirements are met with at least 1 access point meeting the minimum access width of 30' and the minimum pavement width of 24'. • OFF - STREET PARKING /LOADING (Chapter 18.765) The parcel is currently developed as a small office building and a VoiceStream mono -pole facility. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the original CUP for the Voice Stream facility. No changes to the previously approved loading or parking areas are proposed. Chapter 18.765.040 sets no minimum requirement for parking for wireless telecommunications developments. Once construction is completed, an equipment technician would visit the site approximately one time per month for routine maintenance purposes only. PARKING (Chapter 18.765.040) Please see the above narrative addressing Off - street parking / loading (Chapter 18.765). TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS & MITIGATION (Chapter 18.790) The parcel is currently developed as a small office building and a VoiceStream mono -pole facility. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the CUP with the original development. No changes to the previously approved tree removal plan is proposed. Further, please see the attached Arborist Report specifying that the proposed development shall not impact any existing trees. CLEAR VISION AREA (Chapter 18.795) The parcel is currently developed as a small office building and a VoiceStream mono -pole facility with a primary access point to SW Pacific Highway. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the CUP with the original development. No changes to the previously approved clear vision area are proposed. WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES (CHAPTER 18.798.050) A. Uses permitted. The Director shall review the uses subject to Site Development Review, as regulated by Chapter 18.360, using approval criteria contained in Section B below. The following uses are subject to approval under this section: 1. Towers in commercial zones and the I -P zone. A tower, including antennas, other support equipment and /or accessory equipment buildings, in any commercial or I -P district, provided that such a tower shall be set back from any existing off -site residence by a distance equal to the height of the tower; The existing mono -pole meets the above listed requirements to be permitted in the CG zone. The applicant's collocation is subject to a Minor Modification to the existing CUP. B. Review criteria. Any use subject to Site Development Review per Section A above, shall be evaluated using the following standards: 1. Aesthetic: a. New towers shall maintain a non - reflective gray finish or, if required by the FAA, be painted pursuant to the FAA's requirements; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole • b. If collocation on an existing tower is requested, the design of any antenna(s), accessory structures or equipment shall, to the extent possible, use materials, colors and textures that will • • match the existing tower or non -tower structure to which the equipment of the collocating provider is being attached; The proposed antennas and attachment hardware shall be of a similar dull gray non - reflective color as the existing mono -pole described in Section B.1.b above. c. If collocation on an existing non -tower structure is requested, the antenna(s) and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment shall be a neutral color that is the same as the color as the supporting structure so as to make the antenna(s) and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. The proposed antennas and attachment hardware shall be of a similar dull gray non - reflective color as the existing mono -pole described in Section B.1.b above. 2. Setbacks: a. Towers designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back in accordance with the setbacks contained in the base zone; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole b. Towers not designed to collapse within themselves shall be set back from the property line by a distance equal to the height of the tower. Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole 3. Tower spacing: No new tower shall be allowed within 500 feet of an existing tower. lf, having completed the collocation protocol outlined in Section 18.798.080 without success, the provider will be required to build a tower less than 500 feet from an existing tower, it will be required to obtain a Type I adjustment governed by 18.370.020 C8b; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole. 4. Tower height: No tower shall exceed 100 feet for a single user or 125 for multiple users; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole. 5. Lighting: No lighting shall be permitted on a tower except as required by the FAA; Not applicable. No modifications shall be made to the existing mono -pole. 6. Fencing and security: For security purposes, towers and ancillary facilities shall be enclosed by a minimum six -foot fence; The proposed equipment compound is enclosed by a chain -link fence 6 feet high. Please see the Site Plans for further detail. 7. Landscaping and screening: a. Landscaping shall be placed outside the fence and shall consist of evergreen shrubs which reach six feet in height and 95% opacity within three years of planting; Please see the attached site plan for further detail. No landscaping is being removed nor is additional required under the Minor Modification to the existing CUP b. When adjacent to or within residentially -zoned property, free - standing towers and accessory equipment facilities shall be screened by the planting of a minimum of four evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height at the time of planting. The planting of said trees shall be prescribed in • • number by a plan prepared by a registered arborist in locations that (1) most effectively screen the wireless facilities from residential uses and (2) promote the future survival of the trees while limiting adverse effects of the trees on abutting properties. Existing evergreen trees at least 15 feet in height may be used to meet the screening requirement of this section if the arborist demonstrates that they provide screening for abutting residential uses; This proposed compound development is located on property zoned CG, and not adjacent to residentially -zoned property. 8. Noise: Noise - generating equipment shall be sound - buffered by means of baffling, barriers or other suitable means to reduce the sound level measured at the property line to 50 dBA (day) /40 dBA (night) when adjacent to a noise- sensitive land use and 75 dBA (day) /60 dBA (night) when adjacent to other uses. The proposed development complies with the above listed noise levels. The equipment has no external HVAC units to produce noticeable noise. C. Other requirements. At the time a provider requests a building permit, it must demonstrate compliance to all applicable state and federal regulations, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform Structural and Building Codes and FAA. Salmon shall comply with applicable state and federal regulations, and provide the required evidence upon the request for a building permit. STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS (Chapter 18.810) The parcel is currently developed as a small office building and a VoiceStream mono -pole facility. This Chapter was addressed during the approval of the CUP with the original development. No changes to the previously approved street improvements nor utilities are proposed. Sent by: Mericom Corp. 5033033001: 04 /1 70 7:54AM; #311;Page 2/3 lgIOT APR 1 7 2002 File Number I / CleanWater Service Our commitment is clear. k, eoncitivo Area Pre- Screening Site Assessment Jurisdiction (•(,,}ln Date y '' ( Z Map & Tax Lot 13 , CCV21oO Owner 1144/rt- iy Site Address 1(7 ifY S(,O 44 c— 14 (7 20 N D t �2 Contact El) 1.00 R-1K t E Proposed Activity A00 e t.0 i 9►Meitkr Address 2S??? 3k) CA#( p v C4 ./ZO„ r e 14-h -t �kc� -i > 1✓ t (So i1U We (912, 9707a fe tt Phone $o3 363 -- a1 343 -30ot F40( Y N NA Y N NA Sensitive Area Composite Map Stormwater Infrastructure maps ® ❑ n Map# 1 LA El El QS# 1 42.2 ❑ l i I ^I Locally adopted studies or maps El El Other Specify Specify Based on a review of the above information and the requirements of Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards Resolution and Order No. 00 -7: ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200' of the site. THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE CERTIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER OR STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties, a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ® Sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200' of the site. This pre- screening site assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas If they are subsequently discovered on your property. NO FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. THIS FORM WILL SERVE AS AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A STORMWATER CONNECTION PERMIT. LI The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development. NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Comments: /� ` rrer,:kify feols;r;vc e4' ea. eop�nears fo As i ')O Reviewed By; „c Date: N - 3 - 2 Returned to Applicant Mail X Fax Counter Date 14-23— By 61 155 N First Avenue. Suite 270 • Hillsboro, Oregon 97124 Phone: (503) 546.8621 • Fax: (503) 846 -3525 • }vww.cleanwaterservices.org nrrC xj r�o: l� rreUI•I: nhLb l tHUb HF<CU LUNb b10J (bk f I U: (4781a13 P. 003 004 HALSTEAD'S i ARBORICULTURE specialists in the care and CONSULTANTS preservation of trees" .■ David Halstead. Consultant, B.S. Phillip Whitcomb, Consultant • • P.O. Box 1182 • Tualatin, OR 97062 (503) 245 -1383 • April 20, 2002 p. ATTN.: Mr. Dean Hogue 2701 NW Vaughn Street t Portland, OR 97210 PH 503.274.7800 y • t FX 503.274.7803 • i . Reference: Tree Assessment ocation: 11744 SW Pacific HWY Tigard, Oregon 411 A 1 - 'Subject: New Construction I have inspected the double trunk (14" X 2) birch tree and the site plan PT- 322 -01 • for the purpose of determining the amount of root damage that will occur when ,• the new 10 by 15 foot concrete pad is built. # ' nce I was involved with the consulting, and preservation of the birch during the original construction I am very familiar with the tree, the past construction trauma I and the trees immediate surroundings. Three sides of the birch trees' root zone were slightly co nstruction. However, the tree remained very healthy n d structurally stable and did not falter during or after the previous construction. I tlek The purpose of the forthcoming construction is to build a concrete pad that will measure 15 feet south to north a few inches from the existing tower pad and 10 feet east to west 2 feet from the existing fence. This area represents approximately five percent of the entire root zone. The proposed concrete pad will be 4 to 6 inches thick and 3 to 4 inches below the surface of the existing soil. Due to the past grading and filling of this described area where the excavation for the pad will take place, there will be little or no affect on the roots and /or the root zone. .I Email: hacOspiritone.com www.spiritone.com / -hac cm, 0069646 I HrK-CJ- UU: 1J r KUrI: r1HL I t HUS HKCU l.UNS JbJ - U4U - (bd ( I U: SbJe (4 (CiaJ F'. bb4/bb4 I • • • Page 2 April 20, 2002 Reference: Tree Assessment Location: 11744 SW Pacific HWY Tigard, Oregon Subject: New Construction I recommend that only the area designated for the concrete pad be disturbed and all areas outside the pad be protected from grading, compaction and spillage of foreign materials. Secondly, I recommend an Inspection of the site after the pad excavation take place to confirm by predications. If I can be of further assistance please call. Sincerely, David Halstead BS, CA ASCA I . I 1 r • � I { . Reeedved: .1/29/02 .2 :36P• -> Mericom Corp -; Page 2, • t . 01/29/2002 15.:28 FAX 4253987420 X0 .;' •, 01/28/2002 17:03 FAX. 425 653 4810 VoiCES�REAM QQ7 <,;. ;,•;; • 01)28/2002 16:39 FAX 4253987420 002',': '' ;;;..'', • • '. • • • • ' VoiceSfream Site References: 1373 GREE BURG Licensee Sloe Reference: • ;ty'• • ENTRY AND TESTING AGREEMENT . • . • . • . ' • THIS 'ENTRY AND TESTING AGREE ENT ("A arid • •• of the a ., • day of c) AGREEMENT M greement`) is made and ent dnto:as�•�•� • • .------ , --.-- 2Q�� -bY •and. tietween: ; :, Vaic eStteam PCS, I L.L.C.,. a Delaware 'limit_. l iability compa . ("Lice nsor&): and Salmon PC . LLC. a Delaware limited liability company ("Licensee ")' ' ,;.. • • A. • .. Licensor !rages !! - •••••'., r . _ `.;: ;1�: or : as - the' • rig to • • u "Primary Agreement') ; '• „ •,'; ` - hollowing desc ribed properly- • ' G : F7 G f1 . 04) i. QFZ' ' ' •` Operate a •wireless oommunl ti s : : ' p ca on iac.11.0 such..property CSite' „ • t . ,_ „• . •• ', ,, B. Licensee has a po an interest in subleasing, rtion of the Siite.for use as an antenna site receipt and transml�slon of wireiess`comm ni ` :: ` " • for the u cations •signals only; and ` � •? `, � `•• • ' �_ ' C. In order for 41 nsee to determine the:: viability . .arid feasibility. of the'Site ` s an:; antenna . site, • � . . ,; ' it: is necessa • fior employees, `.agerrts��� or Licensor � approved, �:'.lndep''endonC � • • contractors of Licensee .to : 'enter communications. equipment the . an d t , upon Site °`.�t�r1d/or temporarily - 10,00 Site to co redid propagation tests;' and '.to make ap With local;. to and: federal doverntrientaf < antIti fer'apnr,rtvril- of..the; site 0$'''' 1, an antenna site; and . . • • . • • . • D. Licensor and u ee ntt • • • .• .. • • • . • •: • desire le pravide ' for th® • entry u n, Ins .' ction • and/or • r ; . testing ac tivitles and applic l ' s concerning the Site: pursuant to •t he terms`,contained.' Iii tliis : • Agreement.. NOW' THEREFORE In- consideration: of the :iri p ms n .t ,• t�tiial`prcimtses. coveniants,; imdertakin�s nd: othe •cons eration .set f in Is ' and:.licensee ree as' ' ` '` ict �.# Agl+ ®nt I�oinsor: s_9 `� ,{,�11y; • ;:,:, .. . a . • . • 1 . Consent nsor ° consents • • h - '� 8 .9.i�es` that; subject ' �. :... re trictio . erg►. rii3 i d in t @ PRfai • ,ry :A®ree •• povidta ha�iever�.:tl'iat Uceri�see;is provided,a:cop of -t �. ,? cohfan8 Prima Agreeme f , r toe .•. X' . • •. . ry. rin `for roMeW : of this.:Niteein nt ` Ltcenseae;' its'. empici i' author// d - agents " and . Lic n •approve d `'ndepei ant contractors ' CAufhonzed: P a iii • enter ac upon the rri d p mF to: cond a a e rin . "�' : tivit ("Permitted Activities s � ' the • t,1ct °: rid:�per#brrr'i'som+s I foilovgir�g:•�` - ' t" su • . al of`` tfie • •1,,, rveys,` geotechnicah soli: borings :and analyses, • Pil I .., . ` environmental audits, bounde ' surveys,: radio propagation studies, , and ch s o in of . the Site which Li see em ° s u Other. halt n . ` . Lige before ' may de reasonably neoessery.. Licensee ahell: notify ; nsor's • prior obnsent n Licensor's •t and obtain ui • merit :Li ' shall accessing aver; • rnonopoie• end/Or " p censee s equipment not remain at the Site beyond any • • eight • hour. ' .. period;::::.' • • :'•. •• . .. without the prior written consent Of Licennsor.; Notwithstanding anything to• the contrary herein, ' .; . , •_ '•: Licensee in performing the Per jnttted •Activttles Shall not interfere with Licensor's operations oti • •' • • the Site nor cause interferen a to L.icensor's antenna • facilities. • Ucensee agrees to.-.be responsible for any and all •sts related to the Permitted Activities,. including temporary ' installation on and operation an L• removal of equipment on the Site. . • . • • 2. Access_ Limos - r agrees that subject to all restrictions contained in the Primary . • Agreement between Licensor , • the owner of the Site, provided however, that Licensee is. • • • • Voicesbeerri Sits Ref�erenc� • 3 ' 9 ._ ; 3i au -0 . P ape 1 Ucensee Site Reference: . • • • I . • ... ., . . . . . . . . .. .. • . Reeived: .1/29/02. 2:37111 > Mericom Corp.; • Page 3 111 ...... .... — .-.....--, , .....•....,....., .:Rirt.4......s... . .. 01/29/2002 15:29 FAX 74 42539820 • • ' 01/28/2002 FAX 425 653 4810 vOICESTREAM .. : : . .' •• •• .. • . ':.'• ••••!A: .08:..:J :;,,...':"..',," . . • --- .0i/26/2002 16:30 FAX 4253087420 • • • . .:. . :.....,... ,... ., . ..• .. . . ,..,,,,•• .,. . _ • c• • " .• • •• ' .. . . . .. • . • .,.... . • ... • ... • ..., . . . . • . .. .. „ ,.,.,... .... , • . • provided a copy of the Prima Agreement for review PrIor to execution a this Agneernerkine.2., • ,..., .... • • Authorized Parties may enter lJpO the Site to perferrn the Permitted Activities upOn errecetleri,*; .• • this Agreernent and may have access to the Site subject to the restriction In Seclion'1,,f0uP"t6s: ' .... • .:,::... thirty (30) days. • . , . . . ••. •••,... • r • . • . . ' • . ' r ' . ' •.• 'r . •" •, . • ... . . , . . 3. • Remove! of Property. Licensee agrees that it shell upon the concluSIOn of the . . term of this Agreement, rem 4,e any an an equipment Installed on the Site as a part of the', . • • Permitted Activities, repair a and : all damage to the She that • might • have been Oii3O40:•ii,•'.... ..• ... :.',•': , . ., • . . connection with eny of the Perpiitted .Acthilties,:and Shalt return the Site to the conditien• it Waein.. .... . ••• : .: , • . before•*.LIcerisee's entry onto the Site In the event any equipment Installed 6n Site , bi.....,.... ' • • Licensee Is not timely remove4, .11cerisor shall haire:the absolute right uPon three (0)., .._ Written notice to Licensee, to remove • and Shire such equipment at Liaansee's soler;COst:10:•;".:,:.:...::::.......1.. , ., .,..., ., . .....: . . eXpense.... In the event the .eq4i ipment Is stored and Licensee ' does not .rerebirei ' , ••• - • • • • from storage Withiri thirty. (30) ,_• • from LICentee's receipt of the..abOve.written.nOtiCe;;,LICerasor.1,,,;•::::::.,1.,„ . - • .•• • • may dispose of such .equipmqrit et LieenseiteSsOle deist:and bitierife:.:. . -.. - .• ... -; ..t::..;'..c..:- : . • ... .7..,:., . . , • . , • .. • . . .. . . • • . • . . .. • .• • • •• .: . ....;•,•:-. ..., •,...' •: . ,.•:..;.:!..,•.'! '. •• ' • • - .. • • 4.: Indemnity, Licensee agrees to indeMnify, save harmless; and defend 4 • :•':.:•.'• •:',':; , • .: :' . •••• ... ate directors, officers, employees from and against any and all Claims,' actions, danogeSdiadiltty...::'.."..,. ','•1 ..',, ..: • .y..' ' and expense in connection with .personal injury and/Or damage to prOperiYarifing'frpre.00;e4tOf?:;;„:: •,.....!...:., 1. ...•.,. , .... • .. • any occurrence In, upon or at the Site'CaUe Or ortilaficin:ef the A • .., •„..::;. ":.y.. • . • Licensee shall be liable for the payment of - any . Shi1-...0, " court costs, ' expenses of litigation, • ...;.• • .*:.•.: ' • : • . '. • reesonable•attOrrieyes.fees and any Judgment that may be entered thereln:.. ... . ••.' 5:. :, ;-: ' ...' ; • ..1: '.. • • ' Licensee : .• - .. . .. : " " • : . . .. -• ' . .. • . .. • ji • . • .. , . . . . , . .., , . : • 5. 2 Insuranee, ___________ must during the term Of this Agreement any, at .ltoe.nsee's ':'.............:.•:.. ,,, . .. . • • ., ). • sole cost and expense, Obtain and maintain not lass than the following insurance: •,.. ....'.,.......,:'..:;c:.,.:.,i .*:,','f!•1:!,..:;', 5.1 • • • . . • • . • . •• .. '. . •• . .:,.;.:;',,,:. • Property insurance, including • coverage for fire extended. • coVeratie.:.• .,...• . • ...:.;;:, vandalism and malldous mischief upon all Licensee's property Iodated' on the Site in amount of not less than 90% of the MO replacement coat; • :. . • • . • ' . • . • • .•::::,,,,':. ' ' ', .: ..'''''':':' , .. . . . ..„.. . . . ....., ...,.. • • ,• . - • , 52 Commercial 'generaI,. liability Written on an . occurrence: basis-. ineeririg•'::'''.',.. . . • • . . . ' • • . operations hazards, Independent contractor, hazard, centracti.iti' liability withilinillubt,het.' . • : •...... .'• , . . . less than .55;000.0 combined 0 combined .sirigle limit' felt . eady . oCcurrence ...i bodily IhjUry,:: • • . : : .. . . Personal' injury, .death and property damage liability na . ng:'LiCenior, as an 'additional-. ' .•••• .: ...,:. •.'' . . . • „ .: insured; : I. . • - . • • • .• • , . . ,, , , ...!• .•,•. .. ..... 0 • ' . . . • ......,„ . • , , .. • ,. - - -.,.,..•.,-., ... ,. ... • . ' .. • - . • • .., • - • ' - - 5.# Statutory worIcees compensation and ernploy r•0 Rabin* Inetirance;:and` .-' •••'?....-:' ' • . • 5.4 Automobile liability insurande in an amou t' not lees than . $;000,O0O;I: - . 1 ',... , , :••.• 7 ..•..::' • • • , Combined single limit for bodily injury, death and prciPoirty. . darnage. • Aristirarice*.Shall-';•;:',': s':. . • include coverage for all vehicles including hired end ri Vinod. ..• . • , ' '. • , ......::-;•..'. .'•;‘';>:: : . •:......'• ''':•'',:.• . , • .. ,. ..:.• • ,. . . • . . . . • . . . . • .5 All insurance poticles must be taken out with rputabio Insurance companieS .'•••:-: • ' ' , s••• .'• • • • • . . . . • • that are [leen Sedto conduct business in the jurisdiction wh ere the Site is located and all : .. • .. •:::. . • insurers must be rated AX(10) or better. Prior to entering the Site, Licensee must deliver - •••• . .. . . to Licensor certificates of insurance representing the required coverages 'and . mirSt::: : .:.. • :..:4..;.: contain an endorsement that there shall be no •material. dh, ange,. reduction in coverage; ." . . ' .., cancellation or termination of the insurance cpverage without at least thitty (30) days'''. . • , . ' ;• • . • • - • prior written notice to Licensor.. • • .. .• . . •........,- • • • • . . . . • .. ' •• . . . . . . . ... . VoieeStreain Site Reference: g13/51Leagistit • . . • • • ' Page 2 • • ' • • • Licensee Site Reference: .... . . • . • ' . . . • . • - ... . • . . . . . ' . . ' • • • Received: 1/29/02 2:37P ? Mericom Corp.; Page 4 • _ 01/29/2002 15:29 FAX 42539874 411 gi 004 : .. 01/28/2002 17:04 FAX 425 653 4810 VOICESTREAM 1009 01/2S/2002 16:39 FAX 4253987420 . ,• 141004 ' - _ i 6. Termination. Licensor shall have ` n to immedlt�in the r ight in nsors reasonable discretion' upon mediately Ler en notice to ate Agreement and all rights of Li ee including that of :access • • ' Licensee. � 7 . Compliance with All Laws... Licensee at its owa respect Agreement regarding applicable laws, regulations, rules and orders with rest to th Site . • and all Permitted ` tied Activities_ • e. Governing Law. The parties agree that the t ch the ru this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of in Site is located,'wI h . out •' :°. ' regard to such state's conflict of law provisions. M1 • 9. Faxed Signature. The parties agree that a f copy of the Agreement with' .':...• ° •:•;. proper signature is acceptable and shall have the same binding tffect as an original with proper.sJg turn, —_ _ - • — _ A9 mei�t IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have e ted day and year first above written.. Agr+eemerrt ae of the LICENSOR: VoiceStream PCS I L.L.C. V 14 ° / ' 4.x'1 • • . Name: Pamela Cook • Title: Site Marketiriv Manager • Date: t1 re) • LICENSEE; Salmon PCS . Name: �e 1 n ri. L . 'r0.4 pax 1 : s Title: N e wog. ha \ C .:sul @." IP1 4E.$ I Date: ....____ I — 2. —D 2. �tue.lep iw re r S Gryoa PLS • • VaiceStream Site Reference: 01373E2 GREENBURO • Licensee Site Refewwnce; Page 3 < ..7 „� . '1 s y western" p ►_I ivvire ess 7535 NE Ambassador Place, Sle B EXHIBIT E Potlland,0A97220 ,. Memorandum of Lejse To the Site Lease with Option dated this ,1} day of May, 1996, between Hans . H. Grunbaum and Marilyn K. Grunbaum, Trustees of the Grunbaum Family Trust under Trust Agreement dated June 21, 1994, as . Landlord, and Western PCS I Corporation, as Tenant. After recording, please return to: Western PCS I Corporation Attn: Leasing Administrator 2001 N.W. Sammamish Road, Suite 100 Issaquah, WA 98027 Site Identification: Pt)- 1373.8 /Greenburg Market: Portland MTA Memorandum of Lease Between Hans H. Grunbaum and Marilyn K. Grunbaum, Trustees of the Grunbaum Family Trust under Trust Agreement dated June 21, 1994, ( "Landlord ") and Western PCS I Corporation ( "Tenant ") A Site Lease with Option between Hans IL Grunbaum and Marilyn K. Grunbaum, Trustees of the Grunbaum Family Trust under Trust Agreement dated June 21, 1994, ( "Landlord ") and Western PCS I Corporation ( "Tenant ") was made regarding the following premises: See attached Exhibit A The date of exercise of the Site Lease Option was U jo%er ) , l 1 960 . Subject Lease is for a term of five (5) years and will commence on the Commencement Date outlined in the notice to exercise provided to the Landlord and shall terminate at midnight on the last day of the month in which the 5th anniversary of the Commencement Date shall have • occurred. Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for five (5) additional five (5) -year terms. IN WITNESS WHERE F, the parties hereto have respectively executed this memorandum this IL day of , Q., 1996. LANDLORD: (� 4%34/qtt,it. B • y / Ha'is H. Grunbawn, Trustee of the Grunbaum Family Trust By: /�� lL. Marilyn ISeGrunbaum, Trustee of the Grunbaum Family Trust TENANT: We stern PC /' i r : it By: � By / Its: i Po61373•B.SLO 16 0 ------ • . _____ ... __ _ ? . . .„-- - - 1,0t.6+ i • • .. : . . 0 • • ' .. .. • • ... ' . . . / • . a 140. so • ' 0 PO MO VICAMMent MID - a:vinare row snammi mmo I . . . DAVORAILSO AN PURASSNO OM PARRAD OS NW /)' 1 •l* ..._. ..-...- t■ A' - • Ir' l i r ' .. . WARRANTY DUD-STATUTORY roam . . n 0 • ..' • '. • INDIVP3UAL GRANTOR . , . . . .. • - • • • 31RIMBAUS . --.—, Grantor, .. • . conveys and warrants to -,11701-11,-11RigiBATRIMILMAIIIII_Ii,-GRINWAIRL.Trnateni_str...tha_fin.nbaua— Zamilx..7xaut_Wita..a.4..fiLali9.4....--..—..... ........----.---....,.... . • . . .._ -- • .. ----- Gran:cc. :fre fr.ile..7fr.; d.:=1. free e ee:r.m....-Eieneee• • : . I except es 'peal cally set forth herein situated In ......nailkistglii----.---.: County, Oregon, to.wlt: ,.. : . .. . • • , - . • • ' • • ' .: .. • See Attached Exhibit A • . . • . I . . . . .: . ‘. ...1 .. . . . . . . • . • ' • .. . ,. * tth . .. . s . • . . . . ' ., .. • • . . . ' . . • • •• . . . . . . - • ' . • . . . . • . • • (IP SPACE INSURIOENT, CONTINUE DESCRIPTION ON REVERSE SIDEI • • ,,- . • The property ii free from encumbrances except . • . • . . . • • . . • . • • • - • • ' . . • . • . . . , . . . .' . • . . .: • • .- - . . . . The true consideration for this conveYsinci Is $...-.- (Here comply with the riqulternente of ORS ps.ojo) . . - • • cr vein!! er •-).... r. -• - ••-•-•-• -..:-:••• .... ...... - ......... ...... .... - .... ... .. -... ..-. .. eth • • ... JD= i .1 .... . . -- . - - - •• ..... •••••••••••••••••• ... •••••••••••••••• ..... •••••••••••••• .......... ••••••••••••••• ... * •-• ••• • •••• •• . ......................................*............... • Dated this ..-4.!.. _ der of .--qullel --..--__.,19_1.4. • • 14414"-^--.- . ' . _ p A tw LLOW USE OF NE parr/ mz IN THIS - , ilia i t aiiiii;iiiiii ...-..---...---.--.--- • . BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPONG NIS INSTMDADIT,TKARSONACCAIIRING FEE .......--:.----.:..-.---.....--..---.-.--:_-- . . • TITLE TO ME PROPEMY SHOULD CHECX WITH PIE AWRMMM OTY OR COUNTY • _ - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10 VERIFY APPROVED USES MD ID DETERMINE ANY _..................„ ' . • LIAM ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PROMS AS DEFINED IN • ' • . • ORS 30931 • • • • • . . . -- • . 'STATE OF OREGON, County of .._1 .. •-•-) as. . • . • t i This nsrumet n was acknowledged be a me on .___Jinne_.22 --__..—, 19-94., . - . . • - • . - - .-..-, • auatclum......—..............: . ............... *. _. II* ........._ . • • -.. •-•‘...."•-_-•.:, .7.--•••-•,>---..,_••••-_-..7, ...... . 2 . . • • • . ...." ... . - •••••".‘ • 1 • t • . . . . • ... ........).......:........ - 1 • . • ,/ t KELLY RAN LEY / r ,L.•?7,,d. ; NOTARY PUMAREGON S I , • . . ,._. . • . ,. '.. • ici• • .goni_ ,..0 ..._ ) N...... COMIAISSION HO. Olzm3 /, . . 1St ,,f• eornmission expires -:.-.... ..-- • . . - ' : KY COMMISSION ECKRES JAN. • • • . • — • '-''''''' "---' - - iiiimARTX DITED • • . ' • • . . • -= Hans Grunbaus STATE OF OREGON, . . . • _.., .__... - . • - .- • Hans El. and KarilynA. Grunbaumlwron . . • • as. _ Trustees, 21390 SW Eq aNANTili • , • Comfy of .--..--........._-____.......... ' - Sherwood, OR ' 97140 I certify that the within Ma • n,- • -- -- . - ORANTAID A ...... Alp . • ment was received for record -on the • . le Alt., .citdlei em l • . • . __ . Alt M • . • • . • - . -....... day of . ,19.... • . .. • • John R. SP Rosenfeld at —....-- o'clock .,-...A1 „and recorded • . . . ._ ACI RICSIAVID . 7 - - 1600. Pioneer Tower • • ' iron in book/reel/volume No..._.......... on • ' ..== ----------. __ • ---- • ibe S. w:Tiifth Avenue • sae ..... •111 Oil . page ._--- Gras lee/ file/instru- • • • . • Portland, OR 97204:2099 . " ',lent/microfilm/reception No-..— • - '- . .... • 5 ' • - - • NAN C. *DORCAS. sir • Record of Deeds of add County. • . ___= - - • , Witness My hand and seal of • • Unt a Awe* h tweeted, all tes tloterneeb • -. _ - r777_ • Ulan be vent to the MIMI whinges . • County affixed. • . _ . • . . • • r : ..-All_SIMIA90-110314KIALted-- ----..... . . . • -. . . • . .• -- . . . ,,...„_-.-.= . . • ,....----............... NAM • DT1A - ' • ......-- , ....,-.............................* , ..:L_. . . By - Deputy _ =.---. NIZT. - lip • • -- - . • . . • • . . - . • • • --= . . . • . • . . • • • • - • • . • ._ . . • . 1:'.'• • c-r . . . 47- 91'` '4 -: ' . • - - -- --- --;-='':: r.. ` 3 " : 4"'igArk.tZ..' c l ) .!" , titiZ : 7;q : '•'^; : •' : S' .. ..:•ii:;e: 2 •:;:i .. .;.iiet ; . : L._!':: 4 4' . . 5 : 1. .. : ilialWvAir 34,R, .Ati.Of'%; • ' _. . • - 71. - ..=7;-:"T .. ,kr . 4.4:; : : - .f..r771 - P.. ...c._t * ■""to:1 'if.:11-14*fl ' ';''''' 4,:;',117-;, . •_, V . • ......,. .1... r•J 4 . ,, . . ,:-. .,A, s ta.,: 71 -.7-=-i.- .-.,..- -•,'..` - • ..-4-.;. -',...-70'.7.i•-,:.IV`,.$1.....1 . . '. . ; ,t _ .., rAi ..,"‹ .__ . • . • ---- :- ,..'S,'.ri tit. - --% • .--,14.A.5T-1,;..i...-f•-.....3.1 ..*.,i ..if- 1.....ryl . - .7, if 1 7 ..,..,, . . . • 1 4 ' ._ . t.rt • k, ' .7.2.", ,,,•.-, • ••-•iff.,. ,•••••9, • t . •.{; t i , , ,v,,Ive,• , ,,..t.. f% .o.- - . • .,,•,41, ...... • . 7 = • -.•••- , •,:::: , , , T,tr ,,, :1 7 : ''■ : a , i kr .,.s. . " • ' - T,..,.• ,i." ti . 4. ,:.- ,, t if a: t e - ..fr.....-6 4 1: . ix_ .'C' • .41..,,... .L: =-- _ - • .. .. . . 4,4 4 Vr..3 i ,-tAtir .,.,.,, • ---- 47':: ... ......r.Skk.';g:T. ,; Ao....:Lt, -,...A. :4; ,,a).: • ,„„.„,„ • 14, Z __________._.„,.......„.......,,,,........ . 7- ,11-9.7 : 7:41' ',:::: - .1,' , 7:-.1nA.-'4. t•,.`,...,' Ave. 4.4.47 • - : t e • V . ;14,7.7.7 ,;......... - - • : , =I: ..it i g , 4 12 zWel,„ i ( azi 4 i. :, ,:;:::A- i : r , votir'ff t.gi Itg. : , . .:, . . ' ,...:1 Et: = • • - • - - - - - - - - :.- - -, ,-.-. - ...7. - ...::::. -, t , . '. ,, ,.... . ...,;:..„...:,„. .,...4.,..,..: •• .• 147 . 40 ...... „: . ,,,,. ..„.............,...,,__._ . ...•..._._._.. ---....-,......, . d z. i.t.-'• •:4`2,!a 2 ;1 4 , -,,. -- - . - ....edi7 .....- --.. * • • . •-.4 ..' 1-4 " •1 fr Da, '• f .... • * ' •• - :..... - Z.--':. - , , 7412 - -- •...-...r.=7:::. • ''' ": :Cr - I - ‘ '.. ii•Ig- tr.i.:4...i.detilt •"•( ..Z F • I . 4 r..wcy÷e.. < .- • ...W.N..a.mutscrod -.--- • -- -- • • - . ri , - ' ----,- :.=1 - - r- r 4 Si4..5T71.554._ kez! , • )..l....4.A... ,.akriV,:! I rcli.q.r.1152-'ithL"..._,MaiR47,-- • . ...- ...._:::,: ..1.. $. ' , . - 7 .7 • .15 4. 2?-44:*4.:Ii.iiiX-T=F " `" ---z. ' ='. , C .....4i . ■... ' . „,,- .. s em. . rer_•111-.z,...r... . . . • --.,.-- . ...‘.. . ...d.itg.4Wit9AbOA4it ' .,. i- *---":::.--- - - .1-. ' — - " Act' '' •"" ....________:.:, - .A.:71prakc - (444.4,2e.igaAsetseatz4tRMAfazgailait....Zig:...:gi.TaT.rsi5liwytweirelifiL:.::: - . 7.::::::=7::::: ... • iir EXHIBIT A • TO . WARRANTY DEED :+•,: • BETWEEN HANS GRUNBAUM, GRANTOR, AND HANS H. GRUNEAUM e AND MARILYN K. GRUNBAUM, TRUSTEES, GRANTEE : `,_, DATED: JUNE 21, 1994 ;' • '' Beginning at the northeast corner of that certain tract. .�', of land in the George Richardson D.L.C. #55 in Section - •. 36, TiS, R1W, W.M. Washington County, Oregon, conveyed ..' to Ralph L. Palmer and Elsa E. Palmer by deed recorded on page 759 of Book 251, Washington County,- Oregon Deed Records, and running thence along the east line of the . Palmer tract, S 0'.08' E. 39.4 feet to an iron rod. set S. • . 52' 23' W. 25.0 feet from the northwest corner of Lot 1, - • of Twin Oaks Lane, a subdivision of record; thence u;:- continuing S. 0' 08' E. 194.8. feet to an iron rod; • running thence S. 89' 43' W. 72.8 feet to an iron rod; , : - running thence parallel to the east of the ' tract N. 0' 08' W. 142.4 feet to an iron rod; thence. continuing N. 0' 08' W. 36.2 feet to a point on the • northerly line of the Palmer tract; thence N. 52' 23' E. • . 91.7 feet .to the place of beginning. Subject to the • rights of the public to all portions lying within public records. i • • • • ; ` , <, % .. .•1• kV•b! . "1: .„ '�.i.f •44. :W rT q - - t.7%,; • ; :i!e•r•y y-':•! :.tw• %NAP . 7 . ..•. , : :::. s; . � v a c. �,r i i :; :N. a • ii: ; .an. 1�.,r R' r ^r ? >: ' • "�• w = 'i.`t i:'e:` y:� �.4. } .T r .;y r1 • i ,1- • •' -- Vii{ ,.:. -:. { y : y A.; =• ! •:;'• , 5 I ... .;:-,5:: :- •; .. . _ � ; 4 9 , 9 M;:t P'ii51 i ' t a t i i • ( ' i a t c a l - i : k � i f Y i 1 - 9 - .r' _ ....._..__. OREGON °r:vunIMENra* aan* APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY APPROACH INSTRUCTIONS: Complete this form, attach all necessary documents and lubmit to an ODOT Distrid Office. A Tax Lot Map and written evidence of the Property Owners concurrence must acc cmpany this form. Aonlicant Information NAME ProoErty Locatign information Own • r Complete only different IN IT the applicant 1 Orr v LAST NAME 2 B FIRST NAME . Salmon PCS, LLC; Men as Agent fl ` 4 tacific Highway, Tigard Grunbaum ATTN: Ed Foumier ' sTAI5R 'SZIP CODE 97223 C01tlTM Washington COMPANY ? S Canyon Creek Road, Suite E IrTAXLaTNAPNUM S 18 TNSHlP. 19 RANGE ECr m 33 A .......,_,.� _... _ 1 S 1 W36CC & 1 S .lW eb 2dy Road 64�Att�ODRESS 2 *11GfARIAY MME 22 ROUTE 31 MAILING ADDRESS 99W Wilsonville OR T a ZIP �DE,,7070 23 MILE POINT u SIDE OF HIGHWAY? NATIONAL FOREST? 'z STATE 3 V070 _ o N RS o f o w o Yes No S herwood OR '9 0 e PHONE NUM BER 10 FAX NUMBER - � LANDMARK ------ — "'.."' ---- ----------- � 03 -3012 Between Costso and Hwy 217 PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER ( 503 (503) 303 -3001 , (503) 625 -7171 ( ) "EMAIL ADDRESS Description (Name) of nearest Landmark or cross street and distance and direction from e d.foumier @mericom.com r equested approach road. (Include this information on the notch) 37 ' EMAIL ADDRESS Property Use Information Loci Government Information APPLICATION REQUEST IS FOR: 'LOCAL OVERNMENT AGENCY 49 PHONE NUMBER 50 FAX NUMBER ❑ New Approach ❑ Change -in -Use of Approach City f Tigard (503) 639 -4171 (503) 684 -7297 S' LOCAL VERNMENT CONTACT PERSON1 KJ< Existing Approach 0 Temporary Approach Moran Tracy - Assoc r APPROACH TO SERVE - ' st LOCAL I OVERNMENT EMAIL ._ ❑ Residential Units 0 Retail I Sq. Ft Morgan @ci.tigard.or.us D Office Sq. Ft. 0 Medical Sq. Ft. st Use back of - this sheet or attach a separate sheet to provide a sketch of the proposed deveio ant site. (The sketch is not required to be to scale.) Include the following N, tion distance Lo and distance to nearest approach roads to Institutional Sq. Ft 0 Lodging Rooms • landm ame or and direction to the nearest • the properties on both sides of thehighway,fare • Prop approach(es) — denote with solid tines. minimum of 500 ft ❑ Recreational Acres ❑ Industr/Agricu Sq. Ft. • Propos d buildings — denote with solid lines • Existing approaches) — denote with dashed lines. • �R EErarROADNAME • Locals or roads abutting the property. • Existing buildings — denotewithdashedtines ❑ Public Street Other Celcular Mono -pole • Arrow i icating North • Highway edge of pavement EsrpxATEO DA LY YENICLE TRIPS " What are the estimated Daily Vehicle Trips? NOTE: LEAVING THE PROPERTY MID RETURNING less than one NOTIFICA ON TO APPUCANT: The ODOT District Office will contact you when your gplicaps IS CONSIDERED INA) TRIPS. been revs d. It Additional documents are required to continue the application process you "Does this CU P96 - 00006 notified. If our completed application is approved, a construction permit will be issued. You will need require a local use review and/orapproval? if so, fist the Conditional Use P erm i t to review the construction permit, sign it, and return it to the District Office. A bond and/or Insurance Number a Local land Use Case Number (if any) may be required t that time For a complete description and application fee information, see OAR 42 Whet i s the current land use zoning of the property� G Comm Chapter l34Q ion5l. ' Major Deviation Required? ❑ Yes ❑ No Minor Deviation Required? 0 Yes ❑ No « What is the proposed kind use zoning o / the General Comm. proper Administrative Fee Received Date Aunt ' Check Number "Does the $50 property have any existing ingress/egress ss/egress easements on or to t property? U Refundable Temporary Approach Fee Received Date Amount Check Number yes, attach a photocopy of the recorded easement(s) ❑ Yes fa No s +s Do any of the apprxants/owners interests y the adjacent THE APPUCANT DECLARE& CERTIFIES AND AFFIRMS UNDER PENALTY OF properties? CI Y es 76t No APPUCABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM AND ATTA « . S ARE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE TRUE "Do other streets or roads border this property? 0 Yes , No AND COMP / i S: ...,... Rls there an existing ODOT Approach Road Permit? ❑ Yes Al NO /��� � -L 734-24e5 CHAMPS (4/00) Application • Edward F. ou . ier - Mericom Corp as Agent for Salmon PCS, LLC MORO ASPR21.2 1 i P ORIVE1002 APPROPC75 zo z i C3): iia -.-.-., . -- \„..,...,, • 0< 1 i7, ,..„, Lim 1 111 "IsAl 221" • 0,21 . ,,,,:.1 .• - ' ' 90 ,,!'--.---..., .. • ''''''''%' ,'.• ' r';'' ". ' ' 0... YO (1.1/ ,--,...--: ..- ,':.:7 ,.' C g „,.."-: ' ....,(=''?" LOT 1 . - ..- %C. ,4P7 .-e ,...■•:-P . 1P , • . o fl • .-.„.,- ...,-,-.....,y ,, 1 E ,..,. , ...:„„„.7. ...X . , ■=2, FIrs4A ' ,- :----:----- V) F2. .2\ ' --le-°,-' --"-..;?'-> %- ''=.17A14.,:;*-> I I\ '':", '''%.",) I . 1.- ist4 ,'''- 1". 5 , .., LOT 2 ' 1 I x17 DRAWINGS ARE 507. REDUCTIONS ..:' C,, ''',',';':''?*:"-:'• .1 ...- '''''-'1:=2, v -- - "'• ' .: /1 I oosorrn M..) 555 4 0 rtpa,: , .. .,‘.. . 9 _„,, {- I r. ,P3111.7107 050GDO OF • 9 C'l X % \ \ S,,, r' ( t 6 *- I l.' 1 LOT 3 : ,r .F:2,4 . : I GAZLEY \ non ,1,, \-.., .1: , . PLOWMAN ARCHITECTS ,e,. EXIST. ASP5.7 I SLOPE 5 '7 \ tE;: '''' n' s:1 I ''' I / O. 0770 \ f' Xe • 5 — - - — — - _ 5 rolig c,.. • \ trti I 047E 4/25t02 % V4 PROPOSED SALMON 005 001.015.2271 REVISIONS 0070). PISIDE EXISTO.0 POICESTRECES 45 .1 00.050 0)0.0. • RE, 007E MC21,71000 112 LOT 4 "'4".1412 4 , . , n , „— . , ; , : 7 IssuC6 !OR & . .PIIFW C. : : ...“)....'.- ' ':145) PT32201 • : I : - : II ,,,.. SW PACIFiC HWY l:: TIGARD, OR a 97223 . .1 (prov,111 N A ,, : ,) HIGHWAY APPROACH Alli PLAN E 1 ! 1 !. Mr/ Al.2 HIGHWAY APPROACH PLAN I.7n I 1 • November 12, 2003 i,,, I � Wayne Wooten CITY OF TIGARD Cingular Wireless Deployment Manager 2701 NW Vaughn, Suite 890 OREGON Portland, OR 97210 RE: MMD 2002 -00008 Cingular (Tigard Vet Site) Modification extension r- • . MMD 2002 -00010 Cingular (Scholls Ferry) Modification extension request Dear Mr. Wooten: This letter is in response to your request for a one -year extension to the approval of the Cingular Wireless Modification approval (Case File MMD 2002 - 00008) of CUP96 -0006 and approval (Case File MMD 2002 - 00010) of CUP 97 -0002. Your request has been approved based on the following findings of fact in consideration of the criteria of Tigard Development Code Section 18.360.030(D). 1. No changes are made on the original site development review plan as approved by the director. The approved plans have not been altered from those that were approved except where required by city staff. 2. The applicant can show intent of initiating construction on the site within the one year extension period; and According to the applicant, the delay was due to economic factors, and construction is expected to begin at the beginning of 2004. 3. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions on which the approval was based. There have been no changes to the applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinances that would affect this approval. Based on the above findings, the cases will now expire as follows: MMD2002 -00008 November 9, 2004 MMD2002 -00010 November 17, 2004 If you have any questions, call me at (503)639 -4171 ext. 2428. Sincerely, Morgan Tracy, AICP Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 • singular WIRELESS EGEI ED November 5, 2003 � 1 2003 CAT( OF TIGARD NQf0 ERINU Mr. Morgan Tracy City of Tigard Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Requested one -year extension of zoning permits MMD2002 -00008 and MMD2002 -00010 Dear Mr. Tracy: On behalf of Cingular Wireless and Salmon PCS, I would like to request a one -year extension to the current zoning permits referenced in this letter. The current expiration date of these permits and the new expiration dates with the one -year extension request are as follows: MMD2002 -0008: Current Expiration — 11/9/03. New Expiration with 1 Year Extension — November 9, 2004 MMD2002 -0010: Current Expiration — 11/17/03. New Expiration with 1 Year Extension — November 11, 2004 We make this request due to a delay in our deployment efforts throughout this market. Due primarily to economic concerns, budgeting of this project was frozen until the end of 2003. Deployment efforts are anticipated to begin again — including construction — at the beginning of 2004. This extension would allow us to complete this fixed period of delay and provide us enough time in the beginning of 2004 to complete construction efforts related to this zoning permit. In addition, we warrant that no changes have been made to the site plan as approved and that there have been no changes, of which we are aware, to the development code on which the original approval was based Please feel free to contact me directly with any further questions or concerns related to this request. Thank y QD Wayne Wooten Deployment Manager Cingular Wireless / Salmon PCS 503 421 2254 wayne.wooten@cingular.com Cingular Wireless • 2701 NW Vaughn. • Suite 890 • Portland, OR 97210 • • 6=9= it; . o ; a s :3 0 1°- 4 / / U Q i ` f % � D g EY, i :, ,/,/ , -= \ti ���\ PT32201 � �_ 41 /.. \.\,,.\.:‘,„,...\_, , ‘,,,,,,,,,,,....,,,,,„_,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,;:.,_;_y.,...,„),‘,,, • s\ -- % V.; . � , = _ ___„ ,I 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY �Y:� y r,. ^ , , TIGARD OR 97223 3 , -r � 4 . 1 . r. - .i} �,.I: - mon P CS 11,�,;. _. iA , N • _ Y v n > 1 • O O CC " 3 I • � MO NORTH OF THE EXIST LEASE AREA • THIS PROJECT IS TO INSTALL A LOCAL PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ALL WORK AND IMTERWLS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN (SHEET DESCRIPTION EXIT 294 (PCS) SITE WHICH WILL TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE RADIO SIGNALS AS PART ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDRIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS I RE' /. OF A REGIONAL PCS NETWORK FOR SALMON PCS, LLC 5 TO BE CON LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. OT NOTHING TONT THESE P ES G 1.O TITLE SHEET THE MAIN COMPONENTS ARE: 1 1 — 11x17 DRAWINGS 1. OREGON STATE STRUCTURAL SP CODE 1998 G2.O GENERAL NOTES, LEGEND &ABBREVIATIONS ARE 50CTIONS 9 � TH ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A EXIST. 129 —O' MONOPOLE 0 100 -0' C.L ! • 9 (2) EQUIPMENT CABINETS & (3) FUTURE, ARE PLACED INSIDE AN EXISTING 2. ANSI /EIA -222 -F CAFE SAFETY CODE NFPA- 101 -1990 S � c p � �`D REDU ,1 ^C `/ ® TO DVOICESTREAM , EXIST. MONOPOLE. 3. NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 1996 CV+„ `17T N ® PORTLAND VOICESTREAM Cl .0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Q \ � ` 0 19VB! N. N. ROWAN �_ 11We.. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CODE COMPLIANCE C 90 ` A 1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS, VICINITY AREA SITE DEVELOPMENT, & UTLR ES PLAN 1 178 OF 0' �m APPLICANT / LESSEE: I ARCHITECT: PRIMARY A1.1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN & EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS � ` TIGARD SA LMON PS, LL C GAZLEY PLOWMAN ARCHITECTS 1 GAZLEY �FPlO POR TLANDROR 9 72 }2 SUIT E 240 2701 NW VAUCHN, SURE 764 OWNER: VOICESTREAM DEA INC. MERICO CONTACT: A2.0 ELEVATIONS 1 PLOWMAN 'Y PH (50 3) 706 -4253 PORTLAND, OR 9J219 25977 M ARCHITECTS c CONTACT: DEAL! HOOUE 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD, STE. E A2.1 ELEVATIONS 1 SuOc Vaughn PHONE: 503) 274 - 7800 x 237 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 Portland, Or. 97210 �O FAX: 503 2i4 - 7803 CONTACT: DAVID WATSON 503 PHONE: (50 3) 303 -3000 5072747807 Far J PROPERTY INFORMATION: FAX: (503) 303 - 3001 SURVEYOR: DATE: 4/25/02 ZO NING: REVISIONS • M L1.0 EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN & TREE PRESERVATION/ MITIGATION PLAN 0 ADDRESS: 19807 N. 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD, STE. E . CREEK PARKWAY N. 2828 SW CORBETT AVE. REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: BOTHELL. N WA 98011 D WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 - CONTACTPORTLAN, OR : RON 97201 COOK CONTACT: ED FOURNIER 411 TO EM CONTACT: LAURA CIES PHONE: (503) 223 -6663 PHONE: (503) 303 -3000 PHONE: (425) 415 -8526 FAX: (503) 223 -2701 FAX: (503) 303 -3001 • EXIT 292 AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: APPROXIMATELY 160 S0. FT. CURRENT ZONING: CO (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) VICINITY MAP ZONING APPUUTiON �: • Qf 4/25/02 ISSUED FOR IDL 1H APN: ISSUED FOR 15136CCO2100 Q 4/18/02 ZONING REVI IDL ADA REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR SITE No. HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ^T322 -0 1 ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. r L TAKE 1 -5 SOUTH TO HWY. 217 NORTH. CO 1 MILE NORTH AND TAKE THE CONSTRUCTION • TIGARD EXIT (HWY. 99W). TAKE A RIGHT ON HWY. 99W AND HEAD NORTH. TAKE THE FIRST RIGHT AND TAKE THE DRIVEWAY TO THE VET BUILDING. TOWER MANAGER: ACCESS ROAD IS ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND SITE IS LOCATED MERICOM 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY SOUTH THE BBUILDING. TIGARD, OR 25977 SW CANYON CREEK RD, STE E 97223 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 CONTACT: YOGI • FAX: (503) 303 -3001 TITLE SHEET DRIVING DIRECTIONS — PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX • G1.0 JOB Ito. 02 - 062 • • GENERAL NOTES I ABBREVIATIONS 6 - =� " LEGEND Z t! 1, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AU DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON SITE. 0 a S YMBOLS G _ S Z. • 2. CONTRACTOR IS NOT TO OBTAIN DIMENSIONS THROUGH MEASUREMENT OF THESE SCALED SUPPUED BY OWNER - IFD DRAWINGS. USE < ANGLE GA - GAUGE SYMBOLS Q : - ONLY THE DIMENSIONS INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS. SHOULD ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS BE REQUIRED. 0 AT . GALV GALVANIZED CONTACT THE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION.. o DIAMETER or ROUND GB GYPSUM BOARD SC SOLID CORE DETAIL No. 4 I PERPENDICULAR GEX ' GYPSUM BOARD SE SCHEDULE DETAIL ROOM NAME SECT SECTION ROOM NAME ••••• 3" BEFORE ORDERING ANY MATERIAL OR DOING ANY WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY IN THE FIELD ALL a POUND or NUMBER (TYPE ' % 11 REFERENCE 7 SHG SHEATHING - I0000 I ROOM NUMBER DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR CONNECTIONS TO. OR INSTALLATION IN EXISTING / PER or OVER CFI GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT SHT SHEET SHEET No. 0 ANCHOR BOLT GRD GRADE STRUCTURES. AND FOR MODIFICATIONS INSIDE EXISTING STRUCTURE, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ( CENTER UNE INTERRUPTER SIM SIMILAR i t, 0' HEIGHT Aw CORRECTNESS OF THE SAME" R PLATE GLB GLUE LAMINATED BEAM SPEC SPECIFICATIONS a -• B UILDING A.F.F. MARKER 4 9 GRND GROUND 50 SQUARE ® 4. ALL WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE A CPS GLOBAL POSITIONING SS STAINLESS STEEL SECTION W M . '9 '3 2 CODES. REGULATIONS. AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH AU. SYSTEM I�•p I FINISH 53'' STD STANDARD LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEARING ON THE AB AIR CONDITIONING GYP GYPSUM Si.. STEEL - SPOT GRADE �O ^ „ -_ � PERFORMANCE Of THE WORK. AC S7RUCT STRUCTURAL i v ACCA 0.5 CABLE H SUSP SUSPENDED � - WALL SECTION �• EXISTING a I r ...- • 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES. cos A ACOUSTICAL SPOT GRADE zA'z�? COVER 5 SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. AGT ACOUSTICAL TILE HB HOSE BIB T AD AREA DRAIN HC HOLLOW CORE T TOP pp DOOR 6. PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL. STRUCTURAL. MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ADJ ADJUSTABLE HOR HEADER EXTERIOR NUMBER SYSTEMS. VERIFY PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OF EQUIPMENT WITH AVAILABLE SPACE AND ACCESS ROUTES TEMP ELEVATION TEMPORARY THROUGH CONCEALED SPACES. A.F.F. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR HDWD HARDWOOD T & G TONGUE AND GROOVE AIX A.F.G. ABOVE FINISH GRADE HDWR HARDWARE INK THICK �,T WW - 7. DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO AGGR AGGREGATE HGT HEIGHT THRESH THRESHOLD _ SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS NDS T W TIEND, AND SUCH SIGN.AT MINOR SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART THE AG.L ABOVE GROUND LEVEL HM HOLLOW METAL T.O.A. TOP OF ANTENNA _ WORK. ALUM ALUMINUM HORIZ HORIZONTAL T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE O - GRID LINE O KEY - ANT ANTENNA HR HOUR T.O.F. TOP OF FOUNDATION NOTE _ - ' t - 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND ADJACENT APROX APPROXIMATE T.O.P. TOP OF PLATE CONSTRUCTION AND UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURRED DURING ARCH ARCHITECTURAL I (PARAPET) WALL CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PROJECT MANAGER, ASPH ASPHALT T.O.S. TOP P RAP OF STEEL O TYPE AWG AMERICAN WIRE IBC INSTALLED BY T.O.W. TOP OF WALL ��' MATCH UNE ' 9. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2 -A OR 2 -A1OBC WITHIN 75 GAUGE CONTRACTOR B BY OWNER 1 TYP TYPICAL O EQUIPMENT LBO INSTALLED TYPE FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT AREA DURING 'CONSTRUCTION. B ICGB ISOLATED COPPER U WORK POINT GROUND BUS BD BOARD ID INSIDE DIAMETER UG UNDER GROUND Z2 Si BRUM BITUMINOUS IN. (") INCH(ES) Ul UNDERWRITERS IL CII) BLDG BUILDING INSUL INSULATION LABORATORY BLK BLOCK INT INTERIOR UNO UNLESS OTHERWISE 4 v� INTERIOR CL o BLXG BLOCKING NOTED ELEVATION BM BEAM W B.O.C. BOTTOM OF CURB V j Bpi BOTTOM jr JOINT CO N BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER VAR VARIES es SYSTEM K VEN VENEER 0 z BTWC BARE TINNED VERT VERTICAL EQUIPMENT COPPER WIRE KPL KICK PLATE V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD W 0 B/U BACK UP CABINET Q NEW ANTENNA Q O C L W s s • . 0 ix 4 lb. (B) POUND(S) W/ WITH FIRE HYDRANT CAB CABINET LB LAG BOLT Z K CEM CEMENT LF. UNEAR FEET W/O WITHOUT Ci LIGHT STANDARD U r4 Oa CF COLUMN FACE L LONGITUDINAL) WP WATERPROOF CIP CAST IN PLACE LT LIGHT WT WEIGHT • CJ CONTROL JOINT WWM WOVEN WIRE MESH Lauri' POLE CLG CEILING M CLR CLEAR E - POLE GUY WIRE CMU CONCRETE MASONRY MACH MACHINE - UNIT MAT MATERIAL 11X17 DRAWINGS • COL COLUMN MAX MAXIMUM ARE 50% REDUCTIONS CONC CONCRETE MECH MECHANICAL CONS CONNECTION • MFG MANUFACTURER MATERIALS ` � � �REp A� CONST CONSTRUCTION MEMB MEMBRANE 7 • CONT CONTINUOUS MH MANHOLE CSH CONCRETE SURFACE MIN MINIMUM 1 . • :) CONCRETE I - ?i- �:-- ,. -t- .,y EARTH . N. FLDIWy --- y • HARDENER MISC MISCELLANEOUS • CTR CENTER MO MASONRY OPENING CD CTSK COUNTER SINK MTD MOUNTED CMU GRAVEL D MTL METAL t i) PDR TWO . EKON ... MUL MULLION ® BRICK .a r SAND d PENNY (NAILS) N '�� OF OpPP t' DBL DOUBLE 1 - I GYPSUM WALLBOARD PLYWOOD f DEPT DEPARTMENT NIC NOT IN CONTRACT DF DOUGLAS FIR No. (#) NUMBER BAIT I: •: :: ;:ah:InA ne4:M• *d IN SULATION I NOM NOMINAL �� 4 FINISH WOOD • DIA DIAMETER GAZLEY EN DIM DIMENSION NTS NOT TO SCALE PLOWMAN DTL DI AIL 0 RIGID INSULATION 'J WOOD (CONE.) ARCHITECTS DWL DOWEL ® STEEL NW tcughn E OC ON CENTER I�� WOOD BLOCKING Portland, Suite Or. 97210 OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OPNG OPENING ® ALUMINUM 274 EA EACH OPP OPPOSITE I' '' ' I EXISTING STRUCTURE 503 274 7803 Far ES EACH SIDE 05 OUTSIDE EW EACH WAY DATE: 4/25/02 EJ EXPANSION JOINT P • • EL ELEVATION LINE TYPES REVISIONS ELEV ELEVATOR PCS PERSONAL ELEC ELECTRICAL COMMUNICATIONS REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY ENG ENGINEER SERVICE NEW WORK — ss — SS — SANITARY SEWER EO EQUAL PPC POWER PROTECTION - - DEMOLITION WORK — SO — SO — STORM SEWER EQUIP EQUIPMENT CABINET EX EXISTING PR PAIR - CENTERLINE — r0 — ED — FLOOR DRAIN EXT EXTERIOR PRC PRIMARY RADIO CABINET — - — PROPERTY / LEASE UNE — RD — RD — ROOF DRAIN F P.S.F. POUNDS DS PER SQUARE BREAK LINE P.S.I. POUNDS PER SQUARE �V Q 4/25 ISSUED FOR DL FAB FABRICATION INCH - EXISTING CONTOUR — us — ctis — GAS O ZONING FACT FACTORY PT PRESSURE TREATED NEW CONTOUR — w — w — WATER ISSUED FOR PWD PLYWOOD FO FLOOR DR RAIN PWR POWER (CABINET) Qp 4/18/02 7,,,,,,, RFVIry/ DL — � ""' — PR — HOT WATER FON FOUNDATION PWS PIGMENTED WOOD STAIN FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER EEC FIRE -- - r — EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE — co — co — COLD WA TER SITE No. AE PT322 -01 CABINET EXTINGUISHER Q E E7 "z EXISTING WOOD FENCE • FF FINISH FLOOR OT QUARRY TILE — x — 0 -- CHAIN LINK ANTENNA COAX CABLE FG FINISH GRADE • OTY QUANTITY FIN FINISH — G — G — GROUND FLR FLOOR R — o — P— POWER — GEN - -- GEN — GENERATOR 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY • FLOUR FLUORESCENT TIGARD, OR — T — T — TELCO — E — E — ELECTRICAL CONDUIT F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE RAD RADIUS F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH RD ROOF DRAIN — 001 — POT — POWER & TELCO — c — C — CONDUIT 97223 E.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY REINF REINFORCED F.O.S. FACE OF STUD REQ REQUIRED F.O.W. FACE OF WALL RO ROUGH OPENING GENERAL NOTES FP FIRE PROOF — — OK? — — OVERHEAD POWER FT FOOT or FEET LEGEND 8 FTC FOOTING — — cN/ — — OVERHEAD TELCO ABBREVIATIONS • FURR FURRING — — ID , — — OVERHEAD — — . G2.0 JOB No. 02 1 ` • TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY VICINITY MAP / ear m • scat (POINT OF BEGINNING OF A POR'ION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 2100 � �o NORTHEAST CORNER SITUATED EL. PALMER TRACT) PARCEL I: U O PAR C CI tAV 9 f � a a / TOWNS TIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M., IN THE S.W. 1 4 OF SECTION 36, LE DESCR/PTION PA FNT PAR d q � H t ) WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON THE NORTH 60 FEET OF THE FOLLOW,NG DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, PF VFLE STREET a � y q ^ N F N PP G�LIG / 1 LOT 1 RANGE 1 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON TO -WIT: P� O • MAP ' BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND IN THE GEORGE.RICHARDSON \ e i ^ U N I DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 55. SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP I SOUTH, RANCE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. \ _ • L w O f f _ WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. CONVEYED TO RALPH L PALMER AND ELMA E. PALMER BY DEED RECORDED ON PAGE 759 OF BOOK 251, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS; AND RUNNING THENCE LM 0' Q Q / 1 ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE PAER TRACT SOUTH 08' EAST 39.4 FEET TO AN IRON R00 SET e y ,• SI TE •° z i o SOUTH 52' 23' WEST 25.0 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT I OF TVAN OAKS LANE. A PUT �,p Q M F- (3.35) i z OF RECORD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EAST UNE OF THE PALMER TRACT SOUTH 0' 08' EAST c . - 19 4.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED W LOT 2 THENCE FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BENNING RUNNING SOUTH 89' 43' WEST 192.8 FEET TO AN IRON w ROD; THENCE SOUTH 0' 08' EAST 154.0 FEET TO AN IRON ROD ON THE SOUTH UNE OF THE PALMER m J 9 ��y} 4 (N 004129' W i I .6 o TR TRACT NORTH 89' 43' EAST 100 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE FOLlOWTNG SAID a \ r' • � `� 01 N _ � _ �l n I SOUTH UNE NORTH 89' 41 EAST 192.8 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PAIAIER TRACT; his z Z !-1 /2 AIUYDNM \ I I L - THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST 154.0 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT \` y W a CAP . 1 ° T =-- -- -- PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGON, BY AND THROUGH ITS STATE HIGHWAY yf4 P p Z 2 � p0 2 03 " t o qGN f 90N, BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 3, 1964, IN BOOK 503, PAGE 463, WASHINGTON COUNTY y � ∎ t'ER \ . AA_ " 'l go c W e I o v 1'36'08 M RECOR RECORDS. O S• • PARCEL II I Pc . y O \ ol ALSO BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND IN THE GEORGE C + 'rte 0 A I F 17.47, , RICHARDSON D.L.C. /5 TH IN SECTION 36, T15, R)W, W.M., WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, CONVEYED TO y � °. H o PARCEL I I � �v' z LOT 3 RALPH L PALMER AND ELMA E. PALMER BY DEED RECORDED ON PAGE 759 OF BOOK 251, WASHINGTON PROPERTY INFORMATION: y g\ 1 I COUNTY, OREGON DEED RECORDS, AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE EAST UNE OF NE PALMER TRACT, ' 4 ' S. 0' 08' E. 39.4 FEET TO AN IRON ROD SET S. 52' 23' W. 25.0 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER Owner: HAWS H. & 4ARILYN K. GRUNBAUM �1\ I I OF LOT 1 OF TWIN OA KS LANE, A SUB ON OF RECORD; TH ENCE CONTINUING S. 0' 08' E. 194.8 FEET Address: 21390 S ED 4 Y ROAD _ S . � I TO AN IRON ROD; RUNNING THENCE S. 69' 43' W. 72.8 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; RUNNING THENCE SHERWOOD, OREGON s71w 9 e \ PARALLEL TO THE EAST UNE OF THE PALAIER TRACT N. 0' 08' W. 142.4 FEET TO AN IRON ROD; THENCE Site: vOICESTREAM COLOCAnON $::. � n � \ CONTINUING N. 0' 08' W. 36.2 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY UNE OF THE PALMER TRACT; Address: 11744 Sw PAailc wwwAY J' I THENCE N. 57 23' E. 91.7 FEET TO THE PUCE OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC TIGARD, OREGON 97223 lP (S 69 W 72.8) I I l OF ALL PORTIONS LYING WITHIN PUBLIC RECORDS. 2 � ' I LOT 4 Assessor's Parcel Number: 0 0I I PARCEL II: Title Report: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF OREGON PRELIMINARY NTLE REPORT NUMBER 956029 DATED MARCH 12. 2002 .9 r0 , m I A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, 4 0 J t iy --- I I WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON AND BEING A PORTION OF NAT TRACT OF LAND Legal Description: *.- CONVEYED TO RALPH L PALMER, ET UX BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 251, PAGE 759, DEED RECORDS SEE HEREON. 1 BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PALMER TRACT AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE o N o NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PALMER TRACT SOUTH 52' 23' WEST 91.7 FEET TO A POINT, WHICH IS ALSO m THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO JOHN METCALF, ET UX, BY DEED . s>s RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 367, PAGE 610, WHICH IS ALSO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT O t j N I I LOT 5 HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 0' 08' EAST ON NE WEST UNE OF SAID METCALF TRACT 178.6 FEET TEMA F /.DOD BONE AFSIGNAT /ON• N.tloae nape Suwon. Prows= m I $ TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF ON THE NORTH UNE OF THAT TRACT CONVEYED TO ROBERT H. county: WASHINGTON MOW. Dale: MARCH 1, 1982 c c I 8 6 CANDUSH, ET US, BY DEED RECORDED AT PAGE 141 OF DEED BOOK 384; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY NAT Peace a 3 of Z. S .......... �ana,uaty - P°w Naam..: 410276 0003 9 .1 °m 1 Ts EASEMENT UNE OF AT TRACT CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF OREGdN, BY AND THROUGH ITS HIGHWAY COMMISSION nr nod Z fee tAl. m I= SITE PLAN I �fB1nATt7 BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 516, PACE 34) NORTH 32' 38' 32" WEST 127.61 FEET TO 5/8 INCH IRON c AnE�S of uwlwl m FLOwG O ROD ON THE EAST UNE OF THAT TRACT CONVEYED TO FRANK STAUCK AS RECORDED AT PAGE 423 OF Lu o SCALE: 1' = 40' DEED BOOK 352; THENCE NORTH 0' 41' 29� WEST ON LAST SAID EAST LINE 1.86 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF Z o CA 0 20 40 80 I I WAY UNE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 99W AT A POINT ON A CURVE WHOSE RADIUS IS 1472.4 FEET THENCE ON a o 61/ 11111. 1 LOT 6 SAID CURVE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 78.78 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3' 03' 55" TO A I POINT ON NE WEST UNE OF SAID METCALF TRACT, NORTH 0' O8' WEST 3.35 FEET FROM A 3/8 INCH GEODETIC DATA: ROD; THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST 32.97. MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. NAD63 Datum EXISTING MONOPOLE Let. 45' 28' 08.15' Len,. 127 45' 33.18' • \ XI TOP OF LIGHT \ TOP OFF ANTENNAS IIIIIIIIIIII TOP OFF MONOPOLE BOTTOM OF ANTENNAS V GAZLEY \ ^ I - P - ORT - PLOWMAN Datum Base: HAD 83 Equipment Used: TRIMBLE 4800 CPS RECOVERS V ARCHITECTS \ S87'16'28' "' (See Nate 2) 2701 NW Vaughn \ - 10.00 N 88'10'44' W Devotion of Surveyed Site Point: 201.6'1 AMSL (NAND 88) Suite 764 2.72 Porslass� 7 800 97210 _ PORT fax Basis of Elevation: Globe/ Positioning system (GPs). (see Nate 2) 503274 503 274 7803 F \ _ 202.6 x 201.6 6.32 -Basis of Bearings: OREGON STATE PLANE COORDINATE 575109, DATE: 04/16/02 V NORTH ZONE _ A 5 02'43'32' E REVISIONS LE - 15.00 LOT 4 REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: D TBM ELEV. 203.4 r • r s _ 0 0 Dote o Field S urve y : 04/08/02 c4 DEA File: 58 6 70000 -010 7 ` A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF < SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH. RANGE 1 WEST. WILLAMETTE ci < < . _e MERIDIAN. WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON BONG A PORTION OF < o s o NOTES; ‘ ■ 0 I PARCEL I DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 96093013, DEED RECORDS J P a '^ 1 Tnl. t. net o bwnaor L.1 I r survey. This I. a specialised tepoQaphk map with property as= N 02'43'32" E a9 OF SAID COUNTY, SAID TRACT BONG MORE PARTICULARLY e nd easements being o graphic depiction of scrims. Ffarmetian gathered born preliminary • title reports, N 87' 6'28' W DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS a ..eoart,, e-vp documents of record, map. e a. monuments found during the x- 10.00I m a field sassy. No property monuments sal uu No . re,wen was peDavid m.e by David 00.2 ` , i fns end Aseoclates. He. 200'3 BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 01. 49' 16' WEST . - 2) The 489488.. 195.56 FEET AND NORTH 88' 10' 44" WEST 2.72 FEET FROM ^ carrier longitude old elevation .hash paean "" °°1"e/ from post CONCRETE PAD WITI O phase data collected using ContAoe 4y Operating Reference Station FM (COLS) and EQUIPMENT CABINETS THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL I; THENCE SOUTH 02 o ea Tame,. 4800 Recover. (Oewtion - :3 INR ELEV 201.4 I 43' 32' EAST 15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH B7° 16' 28' WEST < 3) WA.. WA.. otherwise otherwise noted, ne underground vtnt lac, A 04/16/02 ISSUE IAL BA orb !o this r locating service company was contacted 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 43' 32" EAST 15.00 FEET; per:, map being preporea therefore there may be non -oval. or abed.. utntire SITE No. q on N. property not ehom on this mop - CALL BEFORE WU OM. THENCE SOUTH 87' 16' 0.003 EAST 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF m PT322 -01 < BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.003 ACRE. • CONCRETE PAD �_ - -_ 6 WITH MONOPOLE I BEARINGS BASED ON THE OREGON STATE PLANE COORDINATE aEV 201 SYSTEM SOUTH ZONE. I I 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY LOT 5 LEGEND: TIGARD, OREGON 97223 I 1 A OEA CJNTROL/789 PAVEMENT OF PAVE9E -- 201.6' 201 ANA • FOUND 5 IRON ROD AGL ABOVE GROUND LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED • ®P POWER RISER M SL ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ENLARGED SITE PLAN MONOPOLE DETAIL . 231.1 SPOT ELEVATION ( ) DEED DATA SCALE: 1' = 20' SCALE: 1' = 20' ( ) RECORD DATA PER O 0 10 20 40 � SN 17161 / /�� TREE - BIRCH { - 1 • O JOB No. SBAT0000 -0101 • • / j �a / r -.` ''f O _ �1 `/ 9 1 ., EXISTING _ .�, UQ ~ N`� P GAS UNE ` �� UNDERGROUND ..."' • Vv r -' • - - v' \,\ J .. .,"" - . 1.7. : . p0' - / EXIST. TELCO PEDESTAL 1E5 P � '� / ,� ? EXISTING FIRE j - 4 • HYDRANT EQ•, .,/ ��,83 - / < /' EXISTING OVERHEAD 11 °, / ' POWER UNE C"_ t s=..., i� • !STING AS • - -../ / , 7 z »spa • / DRIVE . \', 9 � . • h /,', I, LOT 1 IO'� / • i / i V t � PROPOSED UNDERGROUND POWER TO : r---- ". �� : / � � ¢ .} {'��� / BUCKET TRANSFORMER /3828 15, •.� 7 - / ` *310' FROM DRIVEWAY' • ' // / ` PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TELCO FROM _ i.'� //� • ' ^ POWER POLE. *300 FROM DRIVEWAY. - F1 :` / f' ?j \< i ' ';'://' . � j / / /i ' I' --- /# ;;\ �,'/ ` 1. V / LOT 2 ' C.) ,•• . . /{ Z // / -- - -- - --- - H ' 1 N g III/ ` cn �� ` \ ';r ,l. .:. '' /�iy III/ J E x15T. VETERINARY 0 W ij 0, ' O • "' r ii/ I ' HOSPITAL I 1 � I )j 1 'dI LOT 3 Z • � � F ` \ 1 1 ` o ., :l/ � 1 i I o l51 i \)(i,/,.11// ` t U) a r ; . • 1. `♦ w. • '_ ' EXI E l P • / - P, I 1 EXISTING LAWN � \ \ ' \ \\ l ♦ I � . l \ \ 1I l l Uil / ' / 1 ',U - - - - -- • 11x 17 DRAWINGS TL 2000, zloo ' t .` \ i � r r 1 ; ! ARE 50% REDUCTIONS r // r ' 1 l 1 ZONING 1 1 ` ` r � � � + 1 � {( 1 i A; 1 PROPOSED SALMON PCS PARENT PARCEL G � \ \• t I \ . 1 1 / — 1 EpUIPMENT AREA, INSIDE C``♦'"� �� i�� ZONE: (CG) GENERAL COMMERCIAL `, `\ , • 1L : 1 ' _ _�� —'• -I f I ® VOICESTREAM LEASE AREA. c�slslar �.N.aLa USE: VET HOSPITAL , � �� - � �j • j ADJ. ZONING c , • JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD i \ �; \ ! ' #11:7/ I LOT 4 i / / G L E G E N D \ \ ` `l I j i i . . l j i i s ;' ; ;% ;' / ZONE' / COMMERCCIAL GENERAL v, waTLAlo, MIXON .� I i ;► : ° / { / � % Vii JURISDICTION: CITY OF TIGARD � O ; 1 ` I i '' I /i 1111 � E OF pR V FIRE HYDRANT i i 1 L .• ' • FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ', 1 !• `,1 1 • • •` � � -�^ � //,///,'//,',//://,'','//,• i' ' GAZLEY • GAS VALVE 1 : � ♦ \ \ T om ; r :i i 1 ,%/ . PLOWMAN • t PLOWMAN \i 1 ` i GUY WIRE ANCHOR .1 '� x.,` _ { + 1 i ' 2 ', : ', :',: , >:',:', , ,:',: , , '/ ; , / , ' ', ' ; ' ;', / ' ,'' '� ' , ARCHITECTS • MAILBOX .1 s ' _.T7 , • t i 1 I / ,, Sum 764 Vaught • d..Y' ° --- .-- �.• , i , Port land, Or. 97210 • POWER POLE I i !�,;,. \" I 1 LOT 5 F ;,,Z C'',';';',''';','' 503 Fax /I / I 1 j ; 1!,y,', ° DATE:. 4/25/02 CJO POWER VAULT 4��• 1tI o SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE I I 19.8 ROAD I ,',' ' ' m ' ' ' ' "' REVISIONS H 1 EASEMENT REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: �' ' i,, • WATER METER 1 { I (PRIVATE) i,p % , CURB UNE mI , --- - - - - -- 1' %�, %; , ,','; ',': %i % ; %. — -- — DITCH UNE co I '11 I {b , ,',, - - -- EASEMENT LINE I 1 ' ' I ; , ,' � • ' � ' �; i, %. ISSUED FOR EDGE OF GRAVEL LINE' ZONWG 1 A 4/25/02 DL LOT 6 { , , , , , , ‘ , / ..c , ,, ,,, , , , , , , , ,, ,,', ,, 0 ISSUED FOR — ate— EDGE OF PAVEMENT LINE I - S - 4 iB 2 / / ZOMNC REVIEW DL - - - -- LEASE BOUNDARY UNE SITE No. PT322 -01 —MP— OVERHEAD POWER LINE — 0117— OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE - - -- PROPERTY LINE 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD, OR NOTE: ALL CONTOURS ARE IN 2' INTERVALS • 97223 N CONDITIONS, �� k � VIC DEVELOPMENT, SITE DEVELOPMENT, 8 UTILITIES PLAN U2� • A1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS, VICINITY AREA, SITE DEVELOPMENT & UTILITIES PLAN SCALE 1• = 30',0. I 1 JOB No. 02 - 062 . i 29 8 `I " • . , 1 1" • 2* -0" II 15.-0" , 6 .3 . -0" - f' „ _ I I 1 1' -8" 1 1' -8" 1-8 z • AI i ...__, EXISTING GRASS & TREE / IF4tIV I I .. ._to STUMPS (STUMPS NOT ,. .. -- — x — X--I ,-- . i SHOWN) , , / • --- rk—Y--:• -----x----X— 7 — X—_ , *--1 , r. . • • • • • • -T. .1 I. • l , ) , \_ I EXISTING •I • I I SERVICE2 BASE BASE EXTENSION I I 1 EXTENSION 1 • 0 4 1•4 ..< I DECIDUOUS TREE (FUTURE) (INITIAL) (INITIAL) (FUTURE) 1 (FUTURE) 1 I 1 AREA I I I : • • • • . . . i.--.__ .• • -., , ,- I I Eli 1 I . • 1 , . le I 1 ILI CC LE 9 .. I \ I • WIDE AC PAVED I I \ I I \ ACCESS ROAD I I 1---LI 1 / / c: . '.- 1 \ ii ■ II • . >. q A i„ligill ,. ...,.. • . • . . „ . , LI ,, •• \ N. \ I VS -METER -----------. / / / - I I . 0 1 ••.. II II N. II S'”iii • i ' , : ; -:; ' . ', ' x BASE e .' • z : b •-.. ..n --- - -- —_,0 -::, ..- .. / / ---i / x 1 1 g I I . . / / , .__..., - 77 - - , I "' ,CF:. ' --' - • . / - 1 I 1 . . . e 7 / . . • ,,,... 7 --,.-- .,7., : - 4 - , • i, -,• . ,-, , • 1 - _ .„, . - 1 I -,... MOUNTING HOLES PER , - 1.",-.' *1.',-- O. - f -..=. e — 1 —• ,2 L = — • • • I I Ali usaE; . . '... . .. . . - , • - :" . ..--.1 ;. - ., .'.. -..--...;-' • .:.., - - .. - -,, - --: * . , . .'" I 1 AM Mir CABINET MANUFACTURERS - f ' ' ''' . . ItEtV ':' ....;'' " W:--: ; • _ 7 P P A PROPOSED SALMON PCS I WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS ' UTILITY PEDESTAL /... I I , %V -.:-."- • ' ''''/: "i'''—'- ' ,- -e.ISPPai - 4 , 7' . ' .,''•,-. • :. _ , s PROPOSED UNDERGROUND Ala PROPOSED 15 X 10' o CEUE; ' -,. pOSIIER & -TEL.0O210 'SITE rei -,--":"' -:', ;- % ',..., ---- SALMON PCS CONC. I I - I CONDUIT TO CABINETS TO BE INSTALLED . - ..; 7 : , ... ',,",. -7 -r&";; ,. r ,, :. A VW EQUIPMENT P. • / 1 I 1 ,:i PER MANUFACTURERS WRITTEN . ...4 4- ,;: ;":../ - , : - / I ., - - INSTRUCTIONS. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. EXISTING 12' WIDE I I I 1 SWING GATES L...—...„,...._....ii - • CO • ;PROPOSED VF_RIZON 'T - - / ' , . - - 4. / I I BACKBOAFLD ; c1- -4 .- ..„: ;;;/' -, . VOICESTREMA ICE ' • / — I . _ I : 0 scA BRIDGE 6 , . /-•-• , - VOICESTREAM EQUIPMENT PAD x I I .- EQUIPMENT LAYOUT El CII. 2 .., _:....__, C_ t. - 3 r-, / . e . m C c. , --- -_-..i r 1 1■1., - . NEW 2' HIGH COAX 11111p1 .1 ' ,, CABLE BRIDGE. RUN .5/ • •.- - co N. q a. /•••• " -... N. ..., Ilk A p 0 o U L T E S . I D E 11.-8" , 0 L' f.'. z • , ,f , 2.— 4" 2 4' 2.-4" 2 ' L>i . N. , , . a I < s s ... ' i I MIV . . ID 6 • „, / 1041W/ I : 1 ' I■1 W Z ' . N. .. , \I A 2 2 ,-- CIS i / s s J I 1 13 i / , \ 1 Ce EXISTING 6 LTIGH i .7..,, \ .,-1-47 . csi — -, -. Cl) CHAIN UNK FENCE.W/ 3 i. y .- / 1 1 A.,A___.. STRANDS OF BAR BEOIRE , • , ,.. I i._, • .-.-.. ■ '. ‘,.. _... - ' ,___, ,-,___ 1 r/ , - __I• ' -. E 1 r — 1 r — 1 1 I —x—..—' =-1.—x x— Y .. r- , EX ING \ - 129 HIGH -‹ /1, ` I , _ : \ / '----- .__ • I I I I I 1 1 x 1 7 DRAWINGS , Ali IF' N- / ...-----"-, STEEL MONOPOLE IN/ 's I I I I I I I ARE 50% REDUCTIONS - I 's / • \ ley _4ALMON,PCS-ANTENNAS ___ ' 1 .1:- I_ I I 1 I I I I 1 X i (i• 1,9p • .-- •----. • -,. V ) ,-,'.\ -.) C -` -, \ ''' . \ ,/ - / 1 : \,. • .4 IA ,. s et'AD i f le . . ° • - • MS • C_N. r .. SERVICE2 SERVICE BASE EXTENSION EXTENSION puNTH Mk -./ f:' -->: ,,_■. .--' (FUTURE) (INITIAL) (INITIAL) (FUTURE) (FUTURE) EMBLY •., i I. ASS %V EXIST. LANDSCAPING X ; ` il 5' :- I t 4- j?. - \ 1 ••••.STOYEIN IL N. PLGI1L1AN C C.s.1 C-7 SHRUBS \ \:N )(\ r, X ---- (,,,,,, ,:-. 'c , 1 EQUIPMENT .--',. ,-,' C:4 .•-•-3 , --.__,...,-, \ I A I ,„„ \ ..., ._ /- _i_ / , - _, -- .• , . '---. -,--*:•_ I , PORTLAND. ORSCON ''' N i - 'T. r ' '----___„--, > ...‘ „ ,..3 c - s • ...' ,...--'2. 1--: .-.•' -: r ) -i-- . 17 v••' L ____J . 2 %) L____JL____J r SLAB 9 I 8 OF Qi' ":.-- '"..: ,.. . ,....s I .', --"7 '.... 7* - . / - .. iI ' . _:_l --T .--. - - 4 N i :, ', i' - ---____ , . 1.___ f .:.....-,. GAZLEY . , :_, . • - 'I k •-•-] I : / i- „ ..>c .,s, , e <:.- f. PLOWMAN '0 1 XI ■ \ : v ARCHITECTS • .••• r ' -_, s - 1 . , 0,,,, , --:, ,---- I / V-9 EQUIPMENT ELEVATION (LOOKING EAST) • -7/,, 2701 NW Vaughn EXIST. LANDSCAPING : 1 . - -4, N.. • - , ! --.. SCALE Suite 764 :-, _, ...,,- 7,,,, -, : 1 , , FonlanA, 0, 97210 (DECIDUOUS & - ...' i -- '' ?/'''‘.‘ (41"t‘ f .■, i : .. 11/Tor•Cf 1 3 CONIFEROUS TREES i '. t s.- \ - ,--, 503 271 7800 ' ...,. 503 271 7803 Fax AND GRASS BRUSH.) _ __5 , \ rn i DATE: 4/25/02 • , L., ,,--, • : . 'c,.; ( ,. _,--,_ -\_, : I REVISIONS - . - ./ \ , X . • . , /1 . - ',,,_ • • • .. 1 REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: --,„, ...' i ! I 1 . . 2' - 2" .,,--„,_/. Th.c ) : :. ..,•r> i -. .-. •' „ ,,..- ' 1-' I • -1___ - . ""X I , ' ' ' -. ':.'• i' .: • . ' - • / . , , _„-, _,...- Alk N 7 ....., I , 1217 -..-; I I .. s, X : 1 ._, • . Z:\ 4 / 2 5 /0 2 I z S c t i , 2 FOR ■_ ot - - ,. • 1. --:S—: ,,- ` -,- \,, ` ' 17, -, N. s 's, ,; I - =' .-- 's.-:! c - _ 2 , e ' . : & 4 ISSUED DL 1 i I • SITE No. L.... c • _ i ,, ,- - PT322-01 BTS - , :_. , BTS ;•-, 1 . . •J• - - PLINTH -'?-• " ,: ../ s --I, / - . ASSEMBLY in :.--.. ,, _ _, -. I _• . . r CONCRETE 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY EQUIPLIF.NT TIGARD. OR : ,.. I . . .. •-•. SLAB 97223 • - A / N ENLARGED SITE PLAN • :i ..._ . , j .-- : .-- EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS I ri 1. VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING , ___ ' .' - . ,..-. _. - •- / I I O UTIUT1ES BEFORE YOU DIG. ,-. -` • .,. . - - ' I ' : ( ). • - - 2. PATCH & PAVE AC PAVING AS ' -... . -- I 1111 i \_..l.g. :, - ...-• . - ; -./ , . 1 • 1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN I SCALE ' 1 4 EQUIPMENT ELEVATION (LOOKING NORTH) l SCALE 4 yr . l JOB No. 02-062 .., • • • 0 c° ig 0- iy. - Wm „.s�3 NOT USED SALE ° ,-.,a 1 2U ;�; iE.sra - TOP OF EXISTING ANTENNAS S i r I I ■ EXISTING VOICESTREAM ti\ TOP OF POLE/ BOTTOM OF EXISTING ANTENNAS 1 CO) �~ EXISTING VOICESTREAM I'L'.; PANEL ANTENNAS. 0 132' _ C.L PANEL ANTENNAS. 0 132' • C.L p ( o Ii W re • r I La N I m W . e I O Z rn O i W O est 1 6 0 CO w il PROPOSED (6) SALMON PCS _ _ C.L OF SALMON PCS - -- -- r AATERNAS—-- WI �O ANTENNAS. (2) PER SECTOR. (3) PROPOSED (6) SALMON PCS I I a SECTORS TOTAL. ANTENNAS TO j ANTENNAS. (2) PER SECTOR, (3) ' BE MOUNTED TO 5' -0' DAVIT I SECTORS TOTAL. ANTENNAS TO ARMS. ■ ARMS. BE MOUNTED TO 5' -0 DAVIT - 11x1 DRAWINGS Allk Alk NV ARE 50% REDUCTIONS `, , ` ctED Ak � $TBYBI Y.LPLOWA f�"S EXISTING 129' -0" HIGH EXISTING 129' -0 HIGH cP VOICESTREAM STEEL MONOPOLE VOICESTREAM STEEL MONOPOLE tY �-3 • PCATLAAO ORBCON = 1 o n - I • O GAZLEY PLOWMAN v ARCHITECTS COAX TO RUN ON THE OUTSIDE 2701 NW Vaughn Suite 764 Po C OAX TO RUN ON THE OUTSID Portland, Or. 97210 OF MONOPOLE. PAINT TO MATCH 503 274 7800 • EXISTING. OF MONOPOLE. PAINT TO MATCH 503274780 }Far EXISTING. I • II DATE: 4/25/02 o REVISIONS REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: • • • NOTE: LANDSCAPING IN FOREGROUND I II NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. II ISSUED FOR • A 4/25/02 ZONING DL PROPOSED SALMON PCS ISSUED FOR I UiILfiY PEDESTAL Qp 14/16/02 20NINC REVIEW OL NEW 2' HIGH COAX I / SITE No. BRIDGE EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN UNK FENCE W/ 3 STRANDS PT322 -01 EXIST- 8' HIGH VS PROPOSED SALMON PCS OF BARBED WIRE. • CABLE BRIDGE EQUIPMENT CABINETS © PROPOSED SALMON PCS • i ® EQUIPMENT CABINETS EXIST. VS EQUIP. EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN [ 11744 SW PACIFIC HWY CABINETS LINK FENCE W/ 3 STRANDS © 97223 , OR _ OF BARBED WIRE. 97223 �� I: EXISTING• s% zi PROPOSED SALMON r -__� 't,:f� ,, F PCS UT P LANDSCAPE EDESTAL y fi (€NF��s L?� cr` ELEVATIONS S ,/ "�,...8 ,yy• � y e 4 VS METER r.: Imo_ w' --! A2 • O SCALE I EAST ELEVATION 1 -_,v NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3 JOB No. 02-062 • • 0 • WO hig ,.O g affi °; • 0 11177 . 1 TOP OF EXISTING ANTENNAS ' ] n 7 ' 7 I I i u 11 i ..-----, TOP OF POLE/ BOTTOM OF EXISTING ANTENNAS - 0 EXISTING VOICESTREAM PANEL ANTENNAS. 0 132' I EXISTING STREAM C.L I I • • PANEL ANTENNAS. 0 132' - • z z a lif a 0. a U) lo o 1 iI 1 I II • I N I ID I ( II °v N I I H i R N C.L OF SALMON PCS I] - �1TENRAS �3 PROPOSED (6) SALMON PCS _ ANTENNAS. (2) PER SECTOR. (3) O 1r 1� r ui N ts J n - PROPOSED (6) SALMON PCS Z SECTORS TOTAL ANTENNAS TO J L. ANTENNAS. (2) PER SECTOR, 3 W 0: BE MOUNTED TO 5' -0' DAVIT SECTORS TOTAL. ANTENNAS TO ) E ¢ O • ARMS. 1 BE MOUNTED TO 5' -0' DAVIT 0 0] • AI f ARMS. i nEr • • o z • It • -a II EXISTING 129' -0' HIGH ! 11x17 DRAWINGS VOICESTREAM STEEL MONOPOLE EXISTING 129' -0' HIGH ARE 50% REDUCTIONS VOICESTREAM STEEL MONOPOLE 0 N a I � D�QW� i � I • I I C y II ; 1 ' t is POFTLAMT, ORBBCCH ... COAX TO RUN ON THE OUTSIDE 9p 4 Ot+ O `L% OF MONOPOLE. PAINT TO MATCH f o EXISTING. I o - i GAZLEY ( PLOWMAN i I v ARCHITECTS 2701 NW Vaughn Soar 764 • i I 0r. 97210 • 503 274 1 1 503 274 7800 503 274 7803 Fa: ! DATE: 4/25/02 REVISIONS REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: NEW 2' HIGH COAX 1 EXISTING 6' HIGH BRIDGE ICE BRIDGE EXIST. VS EQUIP. I © PROPOSED SALMON PCS - CABINETS I EXIST. 8' HIGH VS I ` ® EQUIPMENT CABINETS CABLE BRIDGE PROPOSED SALMON PCS A 4/25/02 ISSUED FOR DL VS METER ■ I EQUIPMENT CABINETS SSVED FOR EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN EXIST. VS EQUIP. • © QO 14/18/ ZONING REVIEW DL LINK FENCE W/ 3 STRANDS CABINETS EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN I OF BARBED N ___ LINK FENCE WI 3 STRANDS rx <,+- —!;- OF BARBED WIRE. �, No. 'i f5,,,': ':..? EXIST. LANDSCAPING - — PT322 -01 fZ :. . • . :..+y.:, .. . — _ ,-]- -- E XIST. LANDSCAPING , ' • :; "`ti - __ ' . . TYP. ---• T:, - - ' -,4,--z TYP• s 11744 SW PACIFIC MNY EXISTING 12' WIDE - 97223 GATE TIGARD. OR NOTE; 97223 LANDSCAPING & PROPOSED um TELOC BACKBOARD W LANDSCAPING IN FOREGROUND FOREGROUND NOT SHOWN FOR NOT SHOWN FOR FLABBY. ELEVATIONS FLABBY. . WEST ELEVATION SCALE A2.1 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1'.10' SCALE 2 1- =10' 2 JOB No. 02 • i : \\ \ 11 l r r' ! / 1' 1 1 i • l C3 0 • ^ - _ \ • \ 1 r 1' 1' I I / 0 111.11111 16 0. nib co 5, y I . W ._ N i 1 1 t 1 / I r l ' 1 1 O � Z CY 1 ) ; i 1 1 f 1 () CD cs, 1 - „, : . ,a 7 - `,.. \ / � I , : ,,, - .; . t ' : \ '• .�- `+ r , '4'6T'` to ' ' 1 r +. \ ss s / t ylt , � - ;` / COSTING GR ASS &TREE I � i 1 i � f y - � STUMPS (STUMPS NOT ,I / `: 7 ) � ' . v SHOWN) / z- r x - z - x - r - x x r z - ' i 1, . x ”? .,Y_r y`;ih �` : � : f ^^ \ I E XLSTING 14' BIRCH _ � a �.a r _- -- -___ 1- / -- - --- -- --- -__ x TREE INSIDE LEASE i + DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MUST BE INSTALLED TO CURRENT NURSERY INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND PROPERLY 4 f � 4� !� x / ; NOT USE • t W- l+ Ana,,, t � a. L f... 12 -0 WIDE AC PAVED' , I O ! I � '� a �'' E Sia -7,c t!"r § r K a S ROAD I I ..;,, {I 3x t� I / ) / 1. TOPSOIL SHALL CONSIST OF IMPORTED RNER LOAM (TO CONTAIN 35 - 40x SILT) TO BE PLACED BY N .nr• o- om i THE L CONTRACTOR. ADD TEXTURAL AMENDMENTS AND BLEND ALL COMPONENTS THOROUGHLY w , .te -t x � a "4, 4;4 + '� - 1 % I 1 AS DESCRIBED BELOW. SOIL DEPTH IN PLANTERS SHALL BE MINIMUM OF 6" FOR SHRUBS AND GROUND ~ _ <� = f c ' p x I 1 COVER AND 12' FOR TREES. .\ ,,, /.37,41,,,... -p i�" r w.V 4 y' x k l • 71 a ,s T � ,. r o, ; x-; y 2. TEXTURAL SOIL AMENDMENTS: GARDEN CARE COMPOST: AS MANUFACTURED BY TAULMAN WEISS, NORTH O N -� , z � # �' �,. .si.r r _ s 'z.2.-,.,•_:-.. I I / AMERICAN SOILS PORTLAND, OREGON, MINIMUM ONE YEAR OLD. FREE FROM NOXIOUS WEED SEED AND Z � ''.J: c ' - ' z , „ ,,07c_; a .,. 1 . I 1 MATERIAL HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. PROVIDE 3" IN SHRUB BEDS. `` 'M ¢ v � - ' s.4:, , , , :.„:.7.1,- , ` '' s .-7.7.-:;';-..s L=_ 7 I I " 1 • Jj Q O \ m' fi �„ f .:c 1 A : s. r - ice „. y . . ? �•?,� �� _ - I I / / 3. GYPSUM: GRANULAR (CALCIUM SULFATE), 50 POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET IN SHRUB AREAS. fp ',; , z $'' ?.` �� y - :» � >< I I i 4. AGRICULTURAL GRADE LIME: 50 POUNDS PER 1000 SOUARE FEET IN SHRUB BEDS. I O w �` J F � ' y JY -` r t � r � N. I I / 5. POLYMER WATER RETENTION GRANULES - FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUANTITY. CO) d , :`•, � 2 ' ? `+Y •+ ``� , . _ PROPOSED 15' X 10' SALMON : I 6. ROT ALL PLANTING AREAS TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 TO 8 INCHES. ADC TOPSOIL TEXTURAL ', .0 - " 1. PCS CONC. EQUIPMENT PAD. ! 1 / AMENDMENTS AND RETITLE BLENDING AMENDMENTS WITH LOOSENED SOIL THOROUGHLY. LANDSCAPE • \1 �� > 1 1 5 +rv, „.r✓ NOTE SEE REQUIRED ITEMS, I I CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL STICKS STONES AND DEBRIS TURNED UP IN WORKING SOIL AT I / COMPLETION OF SOIL PREPARATION, SOIL SHALL BE A FINE HOMOGENEOUS TEXTURE. COMPACT AREAS TO fi NOTE P. 1 1 x 17 DRAWINGS •\ .�''yy ., 4' s > r O / - - I I i I • PROVIDE SMOOTH FINISHED GRADE. ARE SO% REDUCTIONS # z . 'ri'�' t' � . v � - f � y . � __._ I 7. LAYOUT TREES AS DESIGNED ON THE PLAN AND EXCAVATE ALL SOILS FROM PLANTING HOLE TWO , 8. TOP DRESS PLANTING AREAS WITH FERTILIZER (16- I6 -16, WITH MICRONUTRIENTS, AGRIFO I I I TIMES THE WIDTH OF THE ROOTBALL REMOVE ALL SUBSOILS AND REFRAIN FROM USING SOILS IN �c�ED ARC ` `\ 'E a r V I I I PLANTING MIX OR BACKFILL PREPARE A SOIL MIX AS FOLLOWS: 2 PARTS IMPORTED AMENDED TOPSOIL L, 1 ` 3 ., LY'' s: Lc= _J I I / PART COMPOST. � '''' P,M PLANT �SSTBVBI Y N PL► N. . . OYWI ` " \ �__ J L __ i �__ 1 1 AND GROUND COVER- 1 OUNCE PER P PLANT, SHRUBS -4 OUNCES PER PLANNED, 20 -f0 -5, 10 CRAM AND 21 GRAM TABLETS) AT THE FOLLOWING RATES: TREES -6 OUNCES PER -_� N I I I , LANT. 9. PLANT MATERIA T ` ry ! LS .A O ` I 1 �� �a ^ s ' t / SUPPORTED TO ENSURE SURVIVAL 9p� OF 0��� ``� i ', 1 10. PLANTS MUST BE HAND WATERED AND BE IN HEALTHY CONDITION AT THE END OF 1 YEAR WARRANTY r PERIOD, OR FOR 1 FULL GROWING SEASON FROM DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETENESS, R IS - `` \ . `\ i 1•�"'_ f �\ / • LARGER. WHICHEVER - ` 07 !! GAZLEY PLOWMAN I \ I ' LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES S CALE 3 ARCHITECTS NONE 2701 NW Vaughn ` Suite 764 EXISTING 129' HIGH STEEL MONOPOLE W/ ' I I � Portland, Or. 97210 ' L SOJ 1747800 I ` � L SALMON PCS ANTENNAS 0 100 C x - x x x- r- x -x -x -r x -x -r= i SOJ 2747807 F. 1 REQUIRED ITEMS: J DATE: 4/25/02 % 1. REPLACE ANY PLANTS OR REMOVED OR DESTROYED. OLLOWSTHE ARE `�\ // LANDSCAPING NOTES ON THIS PACE FOR ' GENERAL NOTES: REVISIONS ' 'REPLANTING. 1) THIS PLAN ``� 1 REV.: DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: 2. TO PROTECT THE BIRCH TREE INSID THE IS � t PROTECTED AREA, ALL AREAS OUTSIDE PAD MUST aosillitesse i G E F FROM GRADING, C a PACTINC AND EXIST. (8) DELAVAY / RITIONS NIUDING 085TRUC C ONS C OR h INTERFERENCES SPILLAGE OF FOREIGN MAT OSMANTHUS SHRUBS VARIATIONS N ELD COND 3.`CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REQUIRED BY AN ( POSED BY EXISTING FEATURES (E.G. UTILITY VAULTS, UNDERGROUND . � CERTIflED ARBORIST AFTE' 'AD EXCAVATION HAS ' 'I / 1S TAKEN PLACE SS 2 ) ALL PLANTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE DETAILS t I ' \ ■ 1 I i PRONGED SES L HEREIN UNLE SAN DAR DS. w ALL ``� AOCAL JURISDICT ORDINANCES SUPERCEDED sY ANL D C STAND SHAH TAKE DI PRECEDENCE OVER PLANS AND i t STANDARD DETAILS. Q 4 ZONING FOR 1 1 i 1 I C ZONING a 1 L `` \ 1 3 a PROTECT UTILITIES AND ANY OTHER LINES OR STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN SITE No. ` I • ON THESE PLANS. AND HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF, AND i • I / 3) THE CONTRACTOR IS REOUIRED TO TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO ' O / \\ , \ i �\ s-40 ANY ANY DAMAGE TO, THESE ONES OR STRUCTURES. PT322 -01 m \ • `�\ j I 2 i• i j, 4) PRUNING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WESTERN CHAPTER ISA PRUNING STANDARDS AND BE PERFORMED AT MINIUM BY A WESTERN W CHAPTER ISA TREE WORKER, UNDER THE FULL TIME SUPERVISION OF A 11744 SW PACIFIC HY EXISTING PLANTING L I ST ^ @ LEASE AREA \ I CERTIFIED OR CONSULTING ARSORiST. TIGARD, OR ' / 97223 COMMON GENERAL THE GENEL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE TWO -INCH LAYER OF WOOD BARK EXISTING LANDSCAPING QUANTITY NAME SIZE REMARKS ( MULCH COVER. }/4 -INCH TO ONE -INCH 512E AT NEW SHRUB PLANTING AREA. EXIST. (3) WESTERN ' i / 8 TREE PRESERVATION/ 8 DELAVAY OSMANTI4U5 2 GAL RED CEDAR I ' MITIGATION PLAN s 3 WESTERN RED CEDAR IN CALIBER /, 1 BIRCH 14" TOTAL 1 f 1 J IN CALIBER, 1 V . EXISTING LANDSCAPING & TREE PRESERV L 1 .O ATION /MI TIGATION PLAN t .. I 1 LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES E r-% JOB No. 02062