Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CUP1996-00004
• • CITY OF TIGARD • CITY OF TIGARD • Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER q BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0004 Case Name(s): SPRINT MONOPOLE Name of Owner: City of Tigard Name of Applicant: Sprint Spectrum. L.P. Address of Applicant: 7770 SW Mohawk. Bldg. F City: Tualatin State: Oregon Zip: 97062 Address of Property: 8770 SW Burnham Street City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S1 02AD. Tax Lot 2000 Request: > The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment structures. Zone: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Action: > © Approval as requested ❑ Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:9> THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL. ON AUGUST. 19, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN. APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON AUGUST 19, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CLIP 96-0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (COVER SHEET) • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Sprint Spectrum L.P. for ► FINAL ORDER a conditional Use Permit to develop a 100 -foot ) CUP 96 -0001 cellular communications monopole and related ) SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. communications facilities. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to develop a cellular communications monopole and related facilities to improve wireless phone service. LOCATION: A sixteen hundred (1600) square foot leased site of the City of Tigard Water Department site located off SW Burnham Road west of SW Hall Blvd.; WCTM 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 2100. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District) APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum L.P. OWNER: City of Tigard, Water Department APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, 8.1.3 and 12.4. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Approve II. HEARING A. Hearing Hearings Officer Deniece Won received testimony at the public hearing about this application on July 22, 1996. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), and Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. Page 1 - Hearings Officer Decision CUP 96 -0004 (Sprint Spectrum L.P.) • • B. Summary of oral testimony. 1. City Planner Mark Roberts testified for the City. He summarized the staff report and recommendation. City staff recommended approval of the permit without conditions.. 2. Hearings Officer Won observed that the Staff Report did not address storm drainage standards and has no storm water management conditions. Mark Roberts responded that the leased portion of the property is now paved. The project might reduce the percentage of impervious surfaces on this site but could not increase it. Therefore, the storm water standards don't apply to this application. 3. John Brosy, the Portland Office Manager for Bento Communications a vendor for Sprint Spectrum, testified for the applicant. The leased area is used for storage bins and is almost entirely paved with asphalt. The Tigard Water Department now uses the site for storage. He said the applicant has no opposition to any of the staff report conclusions or recommendations. He said the lease agreement between Sprint Spectrum and the City of Tigard provides that the City can place future fire or police telecommunications facilities on the same tower, but they don't have any plans at this time. He understands that if the applicant were to install more than two facilities, the Code would require a minor modification to this conditional use permit. Commonly an additional land use action would be required for any additional co- locator on the monopole facility, even the second one covered by this conditional use permit, because a co- locator would have their own fenced compound for related facilities. III. FINDINGS The Hearings Officer adopts and incorporates in this order the Tigard Community Development Staff report dated July 10, 1996 (the "Staff Report ") including the summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable approval standards, agency comments, and evaluation of the request, except to the extent expressly modified. 1. THE SITE PLAN The proposed project consists of the installation and operation of antennas and associated equipment cabinets for Sprint Spectrum Mobil Services' personal communications service (PCS) network. The applicant proposes a 100 -foot monopole tower. The applicant requested approval for two communication facilities on this monopole. The applicant also requested approval of six electronic equipment cabinets measuring thirty inches wide by thirty inches deep by sixty inches tall mounted near the base of the tower on an eight -foot by eighteen- and -a- half -foot concrete slab. The equipment cabinets contain the power supply, backup batteries, and radio communications equipment for the Sprint wireless personal communication services system. The applicant proposes one antenna array at this time for the usage of Sprint Spectrum and a second antenna array may be installed in the future. • Page 2 - Hearings Officer Decision CUP 96 -0004 (Sprint Spectrum L.P.) • • IV. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compliance with Community Development code. 1. Chapter 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1) The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5) The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 Site Development Review are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use can comply with Chapter 18.130 because the size and shape of this site can meet the proposed use's needs. The site is suitable for this use because the site is flat and has no significant natural features to be considered in site development, the property is physically separated from residential areas. The railroad to the north and the stand of trees to the west provide buffering of the proposed monopole. All required public facilities are available or can be made available to serve this development as proposed. Access, telephone service and power are the only public facilities required by the proposed use. The proposed use will not need water or sewer service. This proposal meets all applicable standards of the zoning district. The use complies with the site development standards set forth within the Development Code. The application does not propose any signs. The antenna facility is not expected to generate light or noise impacts because it is an unstaffed antenna site. Site development will not generate large scale construction impacts because of the type of improvements that the applicant plans. The site will also not require parking because of the type of proposed facility. There are no neighboring residential areas. Page 3 - Hearings Officer Decision CUP 96 -0004 (Sprint Spectrum L.P.) • • There are no unique natural features on this site. The property is level and requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site and surrounding area. VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit will comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer now approves CUP 96 -0004. DATED this 1st day of August 1996 Deniece B. Won, Hearings Officer Page 4 - Hearings Officer Decision CUP 96 -0004 (Sprint Spectrum L.P.) • • Agenda Item: 2.1 • Hearing Date: July 22. 1996 7 :00 PM ,.. :.;: : : : : ::::: :•: :: :•::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::':: STAFF: `:REPORT :TO THE :: : :: ... ,....,:. ..,:. ' .: . ..• ::: >: >::::::::: ><: < >:: >:. :: .:. >> : : < >:HEARING S OFFICER : ............ ..... i i , ,.. OA •• RD ;. TH .CTOF..:TIGAkb OREGON :: :....:: ::.`: :>: . SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: SPRINT MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0004 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a 100 -foot tall monopole and related equipment structures. APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum L.P. OWNER: City of Tigard 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg: F Water Department Tualatin, OR 97062 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District (CBD). ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District (CBD). LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE _ REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • St aff ::recommends :that:.the:Heanng Officer ind•thatthe proposed : '. Use .Permit will recommends APPROVAL:::: : >:::< :;:: >:: :: : : ;:.:::.:::: :::::: : >:.::: :;.:::; ..: STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 1 • • THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site is presently developed for offices that are used for public administrative purposes and a maintenance yard facility. Vicinity Information: To the north, the site is adjoined by the railroad right -of -way. To the north of the railroad right -of -way, the property is developed with the existing Mango- Humphries industrial site. To the west, the property is joined by the Fire District Station. To the south, the site is adjoined by the remainder of the municipal maintenance yard facility. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant has proposed to relocate a portion of the existing storage bunker and develop a 100 -foot tall monopole for use as a cellular communications facility. • SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 100 -foot monopole. This use is classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a Utility. Chapter 18.66 lists Utilities, as a Conditionally Permitted use in the Central Business Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.66 states that there is no minimum lot size requirement. Developments within the Central Business zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant states that the existing site provides landscaping in excess of this requirement. Setback: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street No side and rear yard setback are required except; 30 feet shall be required where a non - residential use abuts a residential zoning district. This site does not abut an existing residential use or residential zoning district. Therefore, this standard is found to be inapplicable. STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 2 • Street Trees: Section 18.100.030 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. The subject leasehold area does not directly adjoin a public street. Therefore, this standard is found to be inapplicable. The leasehold area is part of a site that already has been developed with street trees. Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low Tying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Because this site does not require the provision of parking spaces, this standard is found to be inapplicable. The applicant states that the remainder of the site complies with the 15% minimum landscape requirement. Upon review, the original development application for this property was found to have provided in excess of 15% landscaping. Therefore, it is not recommended that the applicant landscape 15% leasehold area. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height The height is measured from the top of the curb, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Because the entrance to this facility is not located at the intersection of two streets or driveways, this criteria is found to be inapplicable. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106 does not specify a minimum number of required parking spaces for a unstaffed utility use. Section 18.106.050.J requires that all areas to be developed for vehicle maneuvering shall be paved. The applicant is not required to, and has not provided parking spaces. The site access is proposed to connect to an existing paved portion of the site. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(0) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Because no parking is required to be provided to service this facility, this criterion is found to be inapplicable as an approval standard. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 3 • Access: Section 18.108 does not specify a minimum width for access to a facility that does not require off - street parking spaces. The applicant has proposed to provide a 50 -foot gate to the leasehold area. Because no minimum is required, this width is acceptable. Signs: Section 18.114.130(B)(1)(d) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Central Business Zoning District. The applicant has not proposed signage at this time. Should signage be requested at a future date, a sign permit shall be obtained. Site Development Review - Approval Standards; Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these chapters are reviewed below. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.2 (Tree Removal), 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This section is found to be inapplicable because this use is not a residential type of use, nor does the property adjoin other existing residential uses. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The proposed ground mounted mechanical equipment to be developed in conjunction with the monopole are proposed to be screened with wood slats within the proposed chain Zink fence. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Because of the limited nature of the facilities that are proposed to be developed in conjunction with this use, the Police Department has not recommended that security lighting be provided on this site. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 4 1 • Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use as proposed complies with all site development standards set forth for the Central Business Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Slatted wood fencing , existing trees, and other structures will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The Iocational criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Burnham Street which is designated as a Minor Collector Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna through the planting of shrubs. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. STAFF REPORT CUP 96.0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 5 • • No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The property is level and requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use; that leaves remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Operations Department reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comment: The proposed easement is for access only. No buried utilities are to be constructed. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections have been provided. July 10. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner July 10. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers o DATE Planning Manager 1:1CURPLMPATTNCUPC- RPT.DOT STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 6 • • 11' -6' r iiy-tr • • (4) PROPOSED PANEL � ANTENNAS PER FACE. %7 TOTAL OF TWELK If11 • ifl C. w 0 C.5 Z Z Z a STELL MONOPOLE r Ntitititit� a A\ -I. 1 0 :'' cc !i 1 Q 030 SRL FROM ` 9 • T CI NONO[ ‘ ' ' Ntiitt� UIUTY PEDESTAL r Pa EMIPMENT . 1 i PCS EOUP. SLAB I 1 1 UNR 6.- 0' NICK / F LAW O •• FENCE ATTACNED TO EXIST FENCE FENCE CwW U11� l`\ .1 '" ' .•.•. .....: Foul ' GRADE e u 1-ti. - .. . ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT .MAP C UP 96 -0oo4 . SPRINT MONOPOLE 1 • • ,Ai AP!. Ap i `N w4.0 ,l rid 4 ; 3...0. I ► i 4O.JY 10 h E. �� � 1 . . .• \ � R» ltN[ l .... . • • s. •" • \ : , � e + O t cL O j9� r / ,\: `o / //1 .. --- > „ . \ `` • , - 1 0 L<>1 \I ____:::. , .. .. ... , . , 1 \ 1 •® �/ Z .. •z . 5 • ° 1 , 0. J re , . . 4 , r - -- - - - -- , : _ <- 1 C7 4 � ; • - �i.. ao. �g se. u. o+ O i , ?�� I co O \ I 0 1 c • SITE PLAN CASE NO. -_ . EXHIBIT MAP 1� • 7 CUP 96 -0004 _ I1 SPRINT MONOPOLE J, 1; , , 1 . . \ ■.* *4. A. s b z_ *,,...,•04.4P.,.-?,..4.4. ;. *' IP •S: 41111 . lj de ; N. 4 , .44, N* r 1 2 II I I . , _ _ • A ... ? >• • % 4 k... , 4-4. ,;,**- i A i , • . J. ,. w '..- i'.:A>c • • Ica i E i 44, gUI i 4 ,44* ,,, 4 ' . A .44111, i cn 1\ 1 I 14 441mIl 1 c •' Air ■r■ ► ca .,„ ,...... LL 1 '* .4' -.. 44. ' , .. , , -2 , - $0 ., 4xs4.,* 1 CD • • V,* 4,httee* .0 ■ Wile 11 -7-1 ' ♦ • 1 4 Aim ._'. * ! 0).. As 'At St = i 1 •#. •vottu""40.5 a EE IIIII Li ,! vo •' !IIv al um& I. >, ::1-• *# ' A 11 11111111 "11 mmi ____Mmui 0 Anal 11 11 mi � NM mill re. 1 ..„..:... . 411 : i , . Vicinity Mai A j CUP 96 -0004 Sprint Monopole i ' • • xr?:?:' • J CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER p BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0004 Case Name(s): SPRINT MONOPOLE Name of Owner: City of Tigard Name of Applicant: Sprint Spectrum. L.P. Address of Applicant: 7770 SW Mohawk. Bldg. F City: Tualatin State: Oregon Zip: 97062 Address of Property: 8770 SW Burnham Street City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S1 02AD. Tax Lot 2000 Request: > The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment structures. Zone: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Action: > . © Approval as requested ❑ Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:% THE DECISION SHALL BE. FINAL ON AUGUST 19, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON AUGUST 19, 1996. . • Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 960004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE (COVER SHEET) • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by Sprint Spectrum L.P. for ) FINAL ORDER a conditional Use Permit to develop a 100 -foot ) CUP 96 -0004 cellular communications monopole and related ) SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. communications facilities. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to develop a cellular communications monopole and related facilities to improve wireless phone service. LOCATION: A sixteen hundred (1600) square foot leased site of the City of Tigard Water Department site located off SW Burnham Road west of SW Hall Blvd.; WCTM 2S1 2AD, Tax Lot 2100. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION: CBD (Central Business District) APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum L.P. OWNER: City of Tigard, Water Department APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, 8.1.3 and 12.4. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Approve II. HEARING A. Hearing Hearings Officer Deniece Won received testimony at the public hearing about this application on July 22, 1996. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), and Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. Page 1 - Hearings Officer Decision CUP 96 -0004 (Sprint Spectrum L.P.) • • B. Summary of oral testimony. 1. City Planner Mark Roberts testified for the City. He summarized the staff report and recommendation. City staff recommended approval of the permit without conditions. 2. Hearings Officer Won observed that the Staff Report did not address storm drainage standards and has no storm water management conditions. Mark Roberts • responded that the leased portion of the property is now paved. The project might reduce the percentage of impervious surfaces on this site but could not increase it. Therefore, the storm water standards don't apply to this application. 3. John Brosy, the Portland Office Manager for Bento Communications a vendor for Sprint Spectrum, testified for the applicant. The leased area is used for storage bins and is almost entirely paved with asphalt. The Tigard Water Department now uses the site for storage. He said the applicant has no opposition to any of the staff report conclusions or recommendations. He said the lease agreement between Sprint Spectrum and the City of Tigard provides that the City can place future fire or police telecommunications facilities on the same tower, but they don't have any plans at this time. He understands that if the applicant were to install more than two facilities, the Code would require a minor modification to this conditional use permit. Commonly an additional land use action would be required for any additional co- locator on the monopole facility, even the second one covered by this conditional use permit, because a co- locator would have their own fenced compound for related facilities. III. FINDINGS The Hearings Officer adopts and incorporates in this order the Tigard Community Development Staff report dated July 10, 1996 (the "Staff Report") including the summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable approval standards, agency comments, and evaluation of the request, except to the extent expressly modified. 1. THE SITE PLAN The proposed project consists of the installation and operation of antennas and associated equipment cabinets for Sprint Spectrum Mobil Services' personal communications service (PCS) network. The applicant proposes a 100 -foot monopole tower. The applicant requested approval for two communication facilities on this monopole. The applicant also requested approval of six electronic equipment cabinets measuring thirty inches wide by thirty inches deep by sixty inches tall mounted near the base of the tower on an eight -foot by eighteen- and -a- half -foot concrete slab. The equipment cabinets contain the power supply, backup batteries, and radio communications equipment for the Sprint wireless personal communication services system. The applicant proposes one antenna array at this time for the usage of Sprint Spectrum and a second antenna array may be installed in the future. Page 2 - Hearings Officer Decision CUP 96 -0004 (Sprint Spectrum L.P.) • • IV. EVALUATION OF REQUEST Compliance with Community Development code. 1. Chapter 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1) The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter: 5) The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 Site Development Review are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use can comply with Chapter 18.130 because the size and shape of this site can meet the proposed use's needs. The site is suitable for this use because the site is flat and has no significant natural features to be considered in site development, the property is physically separated from residential areas. The railroad to the north and the stand of trees to the west provide buffering of the proposed monopole. All required public facilities are available or can be made available to serve this development as proposed. Access, telephone service and power are the only public facilities required by the proposed use. The proposed use will not need water or sewer service. This proposal meets all applicable standards of the zoning district. The use complies with the site development standards set forth within the Development Code. The application does not propose any signs. The antenna facility is not expected to generate light or noise impacts because it is an unstaffed antenna site. Site development will not generate large scale construction impacts because of the type of improvements that the applicant plans. The site will also not require parking because of the type of proposed facility. There are no neighboring residential areas. Page 3 - Hearings Officer Decision CUP 96 -0004 (Sprint Spectrum L.P.) • • There are no unique natural features on this site. The property is level and requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER • The Hearings Officer visited the site and surrounding area. VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit will comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the Hearings Officer now approves CUP 96 -0004. DATED this 1st day of August 1996 Deniece B. Won, Hearings Officer Page 4 - Hearings Officer Decision CUP 96 -0004 (Sprint Spectrum L.P.) • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: July 22. 1996 7:00 PM TO THE :: .:. ::.::: ::: > <:. ::: HEARING'S: : .': :: : : ': 1 >'� OF n OA SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: SPRINT MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0004 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a 100 -foot tall monopole and related equipment structures. APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum L.P. OWNER: City of Tigard 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg: F Water Department • Tualatin, OR 97062 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District (CBD). ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District (CBD). LOCATION: 8777 SW Bumham Street (WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommen that .tt e:Heanng`s Offic fi nd : that : the : proposed :.Cond U se' . Permit wilt: not adversely'.affect the health, `safety: and welfare` of the :City. Therefore, staff STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 1 • • . .: TH IS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM:THE:EFFECTIVE.DATE OF.:THIS DECISON: ::: :::::::::;:: >: • SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site is presently developed for offices that are used for public administrative purposes and a maintenance yard facility. Vicinity Information: To the north, the site is adjoined by the railroad right -of -way. To the north of the railroad right -of -way, the property is developed with the existing Mango- Humphries industrial site. To the west, the property is joined by the Fire District Station. To the south, the site is adjoined by the remainder of the municipal maintenance yard facility. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant has proposed to relocate a portion of the existing storage bunker and develop a 100 -foot tall monopole for use as a cellular communications facility. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 100 -foot monopole. This use is classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a Utility. Chapter 18.66 lists Utilities, as a Conditionally Permitted use in the Central Business Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.66 states that there is no minimum lot size requirement Developments within the Central Business zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant states that the existing site provides landscaping in excess of this requirement. Setback: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street No side and rear yard setback are required except; 30 feet shall be required where a non - residential use abuts a residential zoning district. This site does not abut an existing residential use or residential zoning district. Therefore, this standard is found to be inapplicable. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 2 • • Street Trees: Section 18.100.030 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. The subject leasehold area does not directly adjoin a public street. Therefore, this standard is found to be inapplicable. The leasehold area is part of a site that already has been developed with street trees. Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Because this site does not require the provision of parking spaces, this standard is found to be inapplicable. The applicant states that the remainder of the site complies with the 15% minimum landscape requirement. Upon review, the original development application for this property was found to have provided in excess of 15% landscaping. Therefore, it is not recommended that the applicant landscape 15% leasehold area. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height The height is measured from the top of the curb, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Because the entrance to this facility is not located at the intersection of two streets or driveways, this criteria is found to be inapplicable. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106 does not specify a minimum number of required parking spaces for a unstaffed utility use. Section 18.106.050.J requires that all areas to be developed for vehicle maneuvering shall be paved. The applicant is not required to, and has not provided parking spaces. The site access is proposed to connect to an existing paved portion of the site. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(0) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Because no parking is required to be provided to service this facility, this criterion is found to be inapplicable as an approval standard. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 3 • • Access: Section 18.108 does not specify a minimum width for access to a facility that does not require off - street parking spaces. The applicant has proposed to provide a 50 -foot gate to the leasehold area. Because no minimum is required, this width is • acceptable. • Signs: Section 18.114.130(B)(1)(d) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Central Business Zoning District. The applicant has not proposed • signage at this time. Should signage be requested at a future date, a sign permit shall be obtained. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these chapters are reviewed below. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.2 (Tree Removal), 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This section is found to be inapplicable because this use is not a residential type of use, nor does the property adjoin other existing residential uses. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical - devices on roof tops shall be provided. The proposed ground mounted mechanical equipment to be developed in conjunction with the monopole are proposed to be screened with wood slats within the proposed chain link fence. Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Because of the limited nature of the facilities that are proposed to be developed in conjunction with this use, the Police Department has not recommended that security lighting be provided on this site. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 4 Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use as proposed complies with all site development standards set forth for the Central Business Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Slatted wood fencing , existing trees, and other structures will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The locational criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Burnham - Street which is designated as a Minor Collector Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna through the planting of shrubs. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 5 • No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The property is level and requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use; that leaves remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Operations Department reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comment: The proposed easement is for access only. No buried utilities are to be constructed. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections have been provided. July 10. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner July 10. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers o DATE Planning Manager I: \CURPLMPATTY\CUPC -RPT. DOT STAFF REPORT CUP 96-0004 • Sprint Monopole PAGE 6 I .. . t•-6• • 13'— 10 - r (4) PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNAS 'PER PACE. ?7 TOTAL OF TWELVE c i - n W CI z Z z a s YONOPDLC a • • ` , `, 0 ` ; ' OC • � �' Q COAX SNPJONE FROM I ■' COUP. CIONETS TO YOMONOPOLE ` 1 V Y11UT7pPEDESTAL 4 F" CMWETS ENT J [ 1 t J / PCs [OUR SLAB � � t Um s -o N / ' _ CMNN N1c O � FENCE TTACwED TO EA TN EAST PON U A 1 i iENCC � I ` ` o 0 MCC o +s F- ■ FOUIENTIOM ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP �UP96- 0004 ___. SPRINT MONOPOLE • _ . . • f . • 4 111 41 4 1 111 11 likillW eN, 44 - 4 b4 wo 4w , 4 , 4 -44 v4ii. v4. . ; $....0. ,0•_,. 1 \ �0.]Y 10 R.f. ,, .._,_ 1 n Vs°. \ \' PROPERr IINf — I . . . • O : • • . I 4,2:A4Z\ °.1 °i`0. , � � Z 0 ` O.. - V1 ,..,.... s 4 4#1 \\;-,. '.\ • \ i: I 0 <> / , 114 , Fj/ 0. i f � S�• t o 0 ....__ 4., . _ �- , •.7 / '\ `I / / I i \ ' ‘ .' ' s o. AN • Q1 10 4 4, 4 ENNI O I / (1 ,45.4,41,:,0. - .' , � iii , c, Ce I _ GI LL - ` C 1 I / � I C O 0 /' \ • (! '" rri Z `` \\ 0. \. • c I �ts�cfss SITE PLAN • CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP P 7 CUP 96 -0004 t-1 SPRINT MONOPOLE . 1 1 . . .: 1 ! '... ■& iit. s 41° ; : . If, . ***e..4 . ■ 1 . a 4•**, 61 ail ! : .‘. % 1 : : # .1 4 9 wi I 11 . , H 1 ?>:** ,N*7* .1 1. •!! hial *,-.4. A r* , \ 4 -. ■ 4 ■ ■• - • 4 th ; i ot: * - , mil _1‘-. 1_ • , .. ::„ :::!„) . w 1 ct3 , A #. ". ),.. ,..: , ■# ci,,„ , \ „It, 41......t% ici is '..& PA L c 1 c qk 1111, . 1 cu ' 4, A ,, 4 . ,f). •■ . : • tor rid -v. "` I c13 , _,..es . /04 Tee■ • de '. ,..... •••••,,-.W.f. aft Ail" 1 1-- ; ot ATZ•AS ' al ii I 1 ‘0C Arhafillil .II/ nal Mao _?.,, �� ♦ IuII'IIIIIII■■■ .. b. t 11 IiI II 1 1 IIIIIIi' V il NI= T.A. ' . 41 Vicinity Map A j CUP 96 -0004 I Sprint Monopole i Sprint Spectrum, L.P. L�++V T Don deBlanc, Property Manager (Notice of final order by the Hearing's OfficerEAlJ f: ).! 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg. F CUP 96- 0004 /Sprint Monopole) Tualatin, OR 97062 Page 1 of 1 VCI, Inc. Heather Kesten, Program Manager 7160 SW Hazelfern Road, Suite 100 Tigard, OR 97224 • • 4,, j :......,., 4 11 ' 1_I 4 , . CIO of Tigard, Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (chock box above. r appficama) (check appropriate box below) (Enter Public Hearing Date above) • 0 City of Tigard Planning Director O Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) DECISION FOR: (a.drs.a•eww.r -) City of Tigard Planning Director I i That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) FINAL ORDER FOR: . I (Chock box aew., t appicabfa) (check appropriate box below) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director lB Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council I ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION /NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A ", was wiled to each n - ed perspn(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached lis - s), marked Exhi • - ' ;'" o e �` . ay of �� &d—? ., 199 t ' , and deposited in the Uri' ., ''-d States Mai •n ' - l' d. y of , ,. _ . / 199 7 ( , postage prepaid. . . 41&____AI Ped Notice ( V� Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the I ' day of V� ' H , 1'' �.... OFFICIAL SEAL '1 a DIANE M JELDERKS Atop Tv r ` � ® ' N OTARY PUBLIC-OREGON / `� COMMISSION NO.046142 NOTARY PUBLIC a . •EGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 I My Commission . • :.s: (7,, Z7FILE INFO.:L7 nit C916 NAME(S): / � , CASE NO.(S �.�/ 416 11// 4 / TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: 4' May 25 1999 .0 ��- k AT &T Wireless Services CITY OF TIGARD Attn: Real Estate Manager OREGON 1600 SW 4 Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Dear Real Estate Manager: This letter is in response to your request for Minor Modification approval to modify the site plan, to the existing Sprint Wireless communication facility located in the Water District Storage Yard (8777 SW Burnham Street). This property is zoned CBD which allows co- location on existing cell towers as a permitted use. The request is to modify the existing site plan to allow an expansion . of the existing fenced area for the placement of an additional equipment shelter to serve the new antenna. The Tigard Community Development Code, Site Development Review Section, states: "if the requested modification meets any of the major modification criteria, the request shall be reviewed as a new Site Development Review application." Section 18.360.050(B) states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one (1) or more of the following changes are proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve a residential development, therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. . The Development Code does not provide parking standards for Wireless Communication Facilities, however, there is currently space for maintenance vehicles to park inside the fenced area. The applicant has also provided information indicating the expected trips to the site are approximately 2 trips per month. Based on this information, staff finds that the existing space is adequate and no additional on -site parking is required. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structure of the building is proposed. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. No change in the height of the tower is proposed. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected. The change is to the fenced area only. Access to the Wireless Communication facility will continue to be through the Water District storage yard. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to, and from the site, and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. As stated previously, the applicant has indicated that approximately 2 trips per month will be expected to serve the facility, thereby satisfying this criterion. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non - residential use by more than 10 percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The modification will require the placement of a 336 square foot equipment shelter and expanding the existing fenced area by approximately 400 square feet. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and /or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10 percent. There is no area reserved for common open space, therefore, this standard does not apply. 10. A reduction of project amenities (Recreational facilities, Screening; and /or, Landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10 percent where specified in the site plan: a. recreational facilities; b. Screening; and /or c. Landscaping provisions. The site is entirely within an existing storage yard, therefore, there are no project amenities such as landscaping, etc. required. • • 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval which are not the subject of B. 1 through 10 above: There were no conditions specified in . the original Site Development Review that are being violated as part of this modification. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. THIS REQUEST FOR MINOR MODIFICATION APPROVAL HAS BEEN APPROVED A building permit will be required for the placement of the mechanical equipment structure. Please provide a copy of this letter when applying for building permits. In accordance with Section 18.360.030.C, the approval period for this modification is 1 years. If substantial construction has not begun within this time period, this modification approval will be void. If you need additional information or have any questions, please call me at (503) 639 -4171 x407. Sincerely, /le �!� • Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner is \curpin\julia \minmod\AT &T colocation.doc c: SDR 96 -0004 Land use file 1999 Planning correspondence file Spencer Vail, AT &T Wireless Services, 4505 NE 24 Avenue, Portland, OR 97211 • 5/25/99 AT &T Wireless Services Letter Page 2 of 2 Re: Minor Mod. Approval to the Existing Sprint Wireless Communication Facility @ 8777 SW Burnham Street SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICANT: AT &T Wireless Services Attn: Real Estate Manager 1600 SW 4 Avenue Portland, OR 97201 REPRESENTATIVE: Spencer H. Vail, Planning Consultant 4505 N.E. 24th Portland, Oregon 97211 DEEDHOLDER: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 SITE LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street See Exhibit 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TL 200 0. Section 2AD T2S R 1S SITE SIZE: 0.32 Acres ZONING: CBD, Central Business District. PROPOSAL: The applicant, AT &T Wireless Services (AWS) seeks approval of a minor modification to an approved conditional use to allow for the collocation of cellular telephone antennas on an existing 100 foot tall monopole and place an electronic equipment shelter near the base of the monopole. l' \ ; : !.••••.....• • I •I • •:'• •!' • II • • ;• I . I - „.I. : L• . •• .1 ; .; . .; ; ; .; , • • ; • *. . • ; ; I • I • •. ; I. .: • %.• • •••• ;;; ; i ;;; .....1 : •;• ; I. . • • • ,;..;;;.;.;.; I :„;;;•.; :,•;. ;; ; :•:; •..„1 • .• •I , .1• ;;;..;; ;H. !•. ••••• : I 'i* 1 1: • •••:• . .• . ••!••• I : : :• ..•.. . • • . . I . 1 ,;;•;;'; I . i • • •.; ; ,.; I . ; • ; I '; " • • , " ••. I I ; " . • . • ; • • •• •' • • • " :•.•• ..•:• .1 • - . ••••41.... ••••••••• • ••-••••• •,,!••,•,•••,,•• • ••••••••••... -.,•••••••••••... : . ••••: • •i ••••.• • •1••• ••• • • AT &T Wireless Services Minor Modification Request ZONING CODE: The following Code sections are deemed applicable to this proposal: Chapter 18.520 — Commercial Zoning Districts Table 18.520.1 indicates that Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted in the CBD zone subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.798. The existing wireless communication facility was approved under the provisions of that Chapter. Chapter 18.798 — Wireless Communications Facilities Section 18.798.040 contains the provisions regulating the placement of Wireless Communications Facilities within the City of Tigard. Section 18.798.040.A states that collocation on existing towers for up to three providers is a permitted use in any commercial zone as are Accessory equipment shelters. There are currently two wireless providers on the subject tower. Approval of this request would allow the third. Section 18.798.040.D authorizes the placement of the accessory equipment shelter as a permitted use provide three conditions are met. Condition 1 stipulates that the shelter must be located within the fenced area previously approved. The subject shelter cannot meet this standard. The size of the area within the fence must be extended by 20' to accommodate the applicant's shelter. This situation moves the proposal from the permitted use category to one that requires site development review. Chapter 18.360 — Site Development Review Section 18.360.060 establishes the process for requesting minor modification to previously approved plans. References is made to Section 18.360.050.B for the approval criteria for modification requests . The City has approved one such request as a second provider already on this site. Section 18.360.050.B lists the evaluation criteria to be used is reviewing requests for minor modifications. Following is a listing of the criteria and the applicant's responses thereto: Page -3- AT &T Wireless Services Minor Modification Request 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or coverage for residential developments. Comment: This standard does not apply as this proposal does not involve residential development. The proposal is an allowable use in the CBD, Central Business District, zone. 2. A change in the ration or number of different types of dwelling units. Comment: This standard does not apply as this proposal does not involve residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. Comment: Table 18.765.2 indicates that no parking is required for Wireless Communication Facilities. Space currently exists for maintenance vehicles to park inside the fence. The subject proposal will also provide for such parking. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. Comment: There is no existing building that would be subject to this proposal. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. Comment: No increase in tower height is required. The applicant will utilize space below the existing antennas. 6. A change in the type and location of assess ways and parking areas where off site traffic would be affected. Comment: As noted on the site plan, the fence will be extended 20 feet to the east and the gate moved to the north Page -4- AT &T Wireless Services Minor Modification Request side of the fence. Access to the cell site will continue to be through the water district storage yard area. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. Comment: The applicant's facility, based on a system wide average, will generate about two vehicle trips per month. This is well below the threshold set forth in this standard. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non - residential use by more then ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. Comment: This modification entails the addition of a 336 sq.ft. equipment shelter to the existing wireless communications site. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces open space area by more the 10 percent. Comment: There is no area reserved for common open area. The site is located within the Water Districts storage yard. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and/or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by this code or by more then ten percent where specified in the site plan. Comment: There is no landscaping in the area proposed for the applicant's facility. See the site plan and photo on page 2. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not the subject of criteria 1 through 10 above. Page -5- AT &T Wireless Services Minor Modification Request Comment: The information provided with this application has demonstrated that the modifications requested by the applicant will not preclude conformance with the initial approval of the Sprint facility . That approval, plus the Wireless Communications Facilities Chapter of the City Code, encourage collocation on existing towers. CONCLUSIONS: Based on all the information set forth above and contained in the site plan, the request for a minor modification should be approved as submitted. All applicable Code criteria have been satisfied. In addition, the collocation on an existing wireless communications tower is consistent with policies adopted by the city. May 18, 1999 SHV /me Page -6- Pr ■• ... m t ar •u[•e "0411■1114 COMM 17221 _ NW V4 NE U4 SECTION 2 T2S RI W WM. WASHINGTON COUNTY OREG SCALE I 4,2 • 202 • 2A 3 ' gOp \•.°n, °r ° .sa • �` .:r_ . :. — �- Na war m. 1 a n a .` ' . 9 ,! H • / /// " ' loo0 1 nerd. s. .•m 7 W •' • \ •. • . : 9 - '100 801 Aft � � 1/4 COMM 'A• CE'A *r /r n 2 °•17 .. , a•` 601 We z _ `°'"c • 206 -.',.•• C t '' • 4 , . • 3 S • 0" • .. N. - ` , �( v 9pL \ _ f \ ca. 6.m AAc� \ + / b �4, Y •�+ ` ,• 8 t � � . ` • . � �p• . • t ` . ` ', t .4 . 4 803 A, C � G 5 1. L ot ( Y 9, • ; P 7 :. �• tiO3 A � '. \ gap.. 0 . • f i 914 NI' 905 � • • .f 6 t • P fiO . `� Vi * • , - 0 :� 912 8 13 13 t •0. . \\ • / ■ 209 . : •400 • 50t • 7 s !4 . +• • t � \e• 7 1 '209 �� � � • O • � � ' 907 l • • • • 12 . 13 915 • \ S . a . 4. •. 302 ,401 " . 4, 1 ', ' •' .'810 / a• • a t • : .tJ� ''iY 4, . 9oe II a F. / - r\ :• JO * ca ` +9 • y • 8 -- 909 '1 10, / 4,. 17 ' \ • 1500 3021 f \ : , a 300 ". • 0 7 • ... •4. 9 ,� 91T • ". \ \ ' 1 4.4 Q 1 a man ' y • ' .t 4 0a +. 41� X 19 IB \ \ te � Q• C 16 f 1201 �O 919 \ \ '1 s a'• ` ,per r , ZSAc ! A \ \ \ \3 2AA. 1200 Q 1 , • SEE MAP : 0 \ � S ' • Q J • \ 23 1 2BA / .... • N ' � �� f b� Q�,;y~ 4..,„ 1900 ' b q I t./ it, „, 3 4,-, uO‘c I./ " L r At lAg. : ' D 1 0 1900 O r/ / FT • ' .. 'r, �. V. 0 1902 S AVM. v .I <A• 41/11111 ‘ r ^ 55 m \' 3 4,.. -: \ � '.< 7 } 410 0 6d ". 1 „•p .• 40 e • 7 p.•a, . *V . s \ 3900 / j � ' i ' < x10 Y i 4400 'Q ( . 4 '1 . h. • 1) i N (A 4 a l • �e. ` 2100 \ a� .• fl h i . ! � 5301 2000 nar••r•n?II r `A. 5 / /M, ,, Ac u•.war•r re „ y o '. .mabad nrm IIVIMEN24 Mums fir �' _ t ,•`' � ? 6300 SEE MAP . 29 1 2 A SEI Y 4:, 23 4. EXHIBIT 1 • Sprint • Sprint PCS' San Francisco Telephone: 4 10 iaS -1683 Chabot Drive Fax: i 10 -h - i'; Suite 100 Pleasanton. California 0-iiSS February 23, 1999 VIA US MAIL Jeff Penick Cord Communications for AT &T Wireless Services 1600 SW 4 Avenue Portland, OR 97201 RE: Colocation Application for SPCS Site P003XC047, Tigard Dear Jeff, I am pleased to inform you that the application which was submitted by AT &T Wireless for colocation on the above referenced site has been approved by Sprint PCS. Please be advised that Sprint PCS requires a letter from the underlying landlord giving Consent to Sublease, a full set of Construction Drawings and Zoning approval (if required), before we can proceed with a Site Sub -Lease Agreement.. On behalf of Sprint PCS, I would like to thank you for your interest in this site. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 925 -468 -7801. Sincerely, y)/ i Denise M. Carpenter Property Specialist, West Region CC: Cal Bordonaro (WEE) Steve Kartz (RF) Wayne Dixon (Net. Ops) EXHIBIT 2 • Market: Portland Cell Site Number: LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE AGREEMENT ( "Agreement "), dated as of the date below, is entered into by CITY of TIGARD, a Municipal corporation, having its principal office /residing at 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon, 97223, (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord ") and AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES of OREGON, INC., a Nevada corporation, d /b /a AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, having an office at 1440 SW 4th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97201, (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant "). BACKGROUND Landlord owns that certain plot, parcel or tract of land, together with all rights and privileges arising in connection therewith, located at 8777 SW Burnham Street, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon (collectively "Property "). The property being further identified on the Legal Description of the Property attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Tenant desires to use a portion of the Property in connection with its federally licensed communications business. The parties agree as follows: 1. LEASE OF PREMISES. Landlord leases to Tenant a certain portion of the Property containing approximately 800 square feet as described on attached Exhibit 2 (collectively, "Premises "). 2. PERMITTED USE. Tenant may use the Premises for the following: (i) transmission and reception of communications signals; (ii) to construct, install, operate, maintain, repair, replace, protect and secure, its communication fixtures and related equipment, cables, accessories and improvements (collectively, the "Communication Facility"); along with any number of associated antennas, an equipment shelter, fencing and any other accessories necessary to the successful and secure operation of the Communication Facility; and (iii) any activities related to the forgoing. Landlord and Tenant agree that Exhibit 2 shows the initial installation of Tenant and that it does not limit Tenant's rights under this paragraph. Landlord's execution of this Agreement will signify Landlord's approval of Exhibit 2. Tenant has the right (i) to install and operate transmission cables from the equipment shelter to the antennas, electric lines from the main feed to the equipment shelter, and communication lines from the main entry point to the equipment shelter and (ii) to erect, construct or make Property improvements, alterations, or additions appropriate for Tenant's use ( "Tenant Changes "). Tenant Changes include the right to 1 EXHIBIT 3 V (h) No Option. The submission of this Agreement for examination or consideration does not constitute a reservation of or option for the Premises. This Agreement will become effective as an Agreement only upon the legal execution, acknowledgment and delivery hereof by Landlord and Tenant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Agreement to be executed this 18th day of March, 1999. LANDLORD: CITY of TIGARD, a municipal corporation William A. Monahan Title: Tigard City Manager TENANT: AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES of OREGON, INC., a Nevada corporation Dba AT &T Wireless Services By Edwin E. Menteer Title: System Development Manager 12 11 /2/98 land.doc 1,0 'ir • CITY OF TIGARD May 9, 1997 OREGON Mike Unger, Senior Planner W & H Pacific 8045 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR 97008 Re: Proposed Co- Location on the Sprint Monopole Tower Leasehold Area at 8777 SW Burnham Street in the City of Tigard. Dear Mike: This letter is in response to your request for a Minor Modification to the approved Conditional Use Permit for the Water Building site. The Director has approved the proposed co- location of additional antennas on the existing monopole based on the plans that were provided dated April 24, 1997. This co- location is to take place within the existing Sprint leasehold • area. The Director has approved this request as submitted. Please provide a copy of this letter with any building permit requests associated with this use. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning this information at (503) 639 -4171. Sincerely, 3K1/64-1-4 Q-Cti.w_.Z._ Mark Roberts Associate Planner, AICP is \cu rpin \waterco. doc c: CUP 96 -0004 Land Use File 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 • Cud qb -6504 PACIFIC 8405 S.W. Nimbus Avenue RECEIVED PLANNING Beaverton, OR 97008 -7120 MAR 31 1997 CITY OF TIGARD March 31, 1997 Mark Roberts City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mark: Attached please find a minor modification request for an existing conditional use. USWEST seeks to co- locate communication antennas on the existing 100 foot tall Sprint monopole. I have also enclosed the $100 filing fee. Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information (626- 0455). Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Mike Un er AI CP" 130-0-.3 g Senior Planner cc: Steve Maynor, USWEST (503) 626 - 0455 Fax (503) 526 -0775 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture • Environmental Services ® • .• Minor Modification Request for the Sprint Co- Location PCS Site A Proposal Submitted to the City of Tigard Prepared for USWEST Communications 5950 NE 122nd Avenue Suite 221 Portland, Oregon 97230 Prepared by S a W &H Pacific 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, Oregon 97008 -7120 March 31, 1997 • Table of Contents I. PROJECT INFORMATION 1 H. INTRODUCTION 2 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 IV. RELEVANT CRITERIA 3 V. CONCLUSION 3 VI. EXHIBITS A. Site Plans & Elevations B. Tax Lot Map C. Site Photos D. Antenna Details E. USWEST Authorization • • USWEST Wireless PCS - Sprint Co- Location Minor Modification Request I. PROJECT INFORMATION File No: 1815 -0101 (POR75A) Applicant: USWEST Att.: Steve Maynor Market Real Estate Manager 5950 NE 122nd Ave, Suite 221 Portland, OR. 972230 Representative: W &H Pacific, Inc. Mike Unger, MCP 8405 SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton, OR. 97008 Phone #626 -0455 Property Owner: Tigard Water District PO Box 23562 Tigard, Oregon 97281 Site Location: 8777 Burnham Road, Tigard Tax Lot #: S2 12AD - 02000 • Zoning: Central Business District (CBD) Site Size: 4.04 acres Proposal: The applicant, USWEST Wireless, is requesting minor modification approval to attach six antennas to an existing 100 foot tall Sprint Spectrum monopole. W&H Pacific, Inc. March 25, 1997 1 • USWEST Wireless PCS - Sprint Co- Location Minor Modification Request II. INTRODUCTION USWEST Communications is in the process of developing a new wireless telephone system called Personal Communication Services, or PCS. PCS is a unique combination of telecommunication services that will provide the public with the next generation of wireless devices, such as: compact cellular telephones with paging and voice -mail service, wireless fax machines and fax modems, and an array of other customized mobile equipment. When fully developed, PCS will allow for an all -in- one telecommunications device combining multiple services in a single wireless telephone. PCS uses new digital technology to produce a higher quality transfer of voices and data versus the older analog/digital systems that are currently being used by many existing wireless telephone service providers. This digital technology also accommodates the transfer of data and graphics. In addition, PCS operates at a higher frequency, around 1,900 megahertz, and broader frequency band than conventional cellular. This allows for more simultaneous callers. In order to provide these services, USWEST is developing a PCS network in Portland. PCS works by splitting a region into smaller geographic areas called cells, each cell is served by a transmitter and receiver or base station. As a caller moves across the landscape, the call is passed or "handed-off' from one base station to another. Each base station is connected to a mobile telephone switching office, which is linked to the land based phone network serving your home or office. Individual base station site locations, such as the proposed site, are selected based on a number of considerations related to topography, distance from other base stations, proximity to traffic corridors, and other technical features. USWEST engineers utilize computer modeling and radio testing to determine potential sites. Because PCS base stations consist of very low powered transmitters, which cover a relatively small geographic area, there is limited flexibility in site selection. This proposed PCS base station facility located at the Tigard Water District site is designed to provide PCS service to portions of Tigard and Washington County. When developed, this facility will connect to other neighboring facilities in the network allowing for uninterrupted PCS service in this region of Washington County. USWEST'is committed to providing quality PCS service to Tigard and the Portland Metropolitan area for years to come. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The existing monopole will be outfitted with six (6) panel antennas approximately four (4) feet long and six (6) inches wide. Each antenna will be mounted vertically on one of three support arms (two antennas per arm). W&H Pacific, Inc. March 25, 1997 2 • USWEST Wireless PCS - Sprint Co- Location Minor Modification Request In addition to the antenna array, there will be a set of three steel equipment cabinets containing the electronic equipment necessary to transmit the signal. These cabinets are 5 feet, 7 inches tall. They will be mounted to a concrete pad measuring approximately 12 feet long by 9 feet, 6 inches wide. The entire facility will be located within a 525 square foot lease area on the four acre tax lot. This lease area will be surrounded by a six foot tall cyclone fence with a locking gate. The proposed lease area abuts the existing Sprint Spectrum lease area (see attached site plan and elevation drawings). IV. RELEVANT CRITERIA Section 18.130.050 of the Tigard Development Code establishes standards for minor modifications of existing conditional uses. The following criteria must be met: 1. No code provisions shall be violated. The proposed minor modification will not violate any standards of the City of Tigard Development Code. The additional site impact is minimal. All relevant setback, height, and parking standards of the CBD zone are met. 2. The modification is not a major modification. The proposal is not a major modification: • No change of land use will result; • There is no increase in dwelling density; • No additional buildings or structures will be added (with the exception of equipment cabinets); • There is not a change in the type of commercial or industrial structures. • Common open space areas will not be reduced by more than 10 percent; and • All setback requirements will be met. V. CONCLUSION The proposal is consistent with the standards for a minor modification of an approved conditional use. W&H Pacific, Inc. March 25, 1997 3 • • USWEST Wireless PCS - Sprint Co- Location Minor Modification Request VI. EXHIBITS A. Site Plans & Elevations B. Tax Lot Map C. Site Photos D. Antenna Details E. USWEST Authorization I: I PROJECT I 1 815 01061 WPDATA I POR 75A. APP W&H Pacific, Inc. March 25, 1997 4 };' .` - USWest Communications Wireless -: Photo Sheet 9 • 1 R I • • �;; :•:i:.L y+ �?t e : - ,. i:. a �s • ' t a i �.r k i � Y": • � _ � 4'C ✓.Jr, ° `, " ' � ( .S' Sig wad �'�� .•. C� I. c` , • .. • SITE # LOOKING AT 120 DEGREES FROM SITE • r. • i ., • ter '' • ... _ '1, _ - -' w .., SITE # POR -075A LOOKING AT 240 DEGREES FROM SITE • .. : .; iiiL ;"..;:::;;!..:•;t:.;11;,.'40 • ;:ii'4VINI.: • • 4 1.- 04.'44 'E X':• • • t • .•... US West Communications Wireless Photo Sheet . .. ....... . -....u.,•,.•::,..p..-:::: 111 li _., .••• • .••.,..::. • .:....:.,,,,,.., ..-•,-- - 7 -.;;; 1? -::•,, ..,.' ,- •;4,;_,. ',; .;7" . 1_,.,. .; - . , ,j, '..1 . . ....1P-cir 4!):'.":"...-1.;_r:i.-..i.ii-:„;',:: • .1 ...v". N-4, — ,!-.;-:- • .:/....f.:i.-.1',.,..., pe11,44•Ar.,..."14.,..1,-L,...,12.. ..L.. ,, : : ...;::.„,...,4/.. ) ., . 14.--• • ....e..^.r- • ri • • 7• •■ 7 4‘,..t..1.1t.t.t./.41.,C.4:1•,;..77.,:40tr,..• Ittift li.-...,:. j. 4 " , - .. .!:. ti (''''.■'", E L t`ri'' ' ' 'I lit e. ".. , .V. i',. • '4 ', r ' ..X • ; ' . : I I, ., ; ,1111' :1' ...(42.•2',:j.12•,-2-0:4- • • 5 2 .- 0.•: • ...:• , ..;:..1.•,., ,:. , : . ,.; , . .. . --,$; i)p.- 1•••••.. 4 , . .:-!,..-1 , ...:4 4 . ....;.• , :: , ..... , 7:. • .f -:. :• • - 1 :.!.. - el..,...:. •- i ri?,... 2 'I*'° . t• i 146 • .. 4;..Vb: • • • . . • ' ..:"....(1..i..;1!;:lrat.' V N ./...... ....s • ' 'b.* • JP : :: • • • It. 0..p.• •;(1••• ',.. .• '...... • • • '' • ••• - VO* A • • • .40 .,'!, • • - :. ...7" . .... v I.: ..:gro ,.. ...:-• • •....• -. . "'"e:a.... '''''....-',....4 '7 : •••• ":3 ,. •.". ;• • . • . . ' - - ..t.p-rf..Er...4,,F.4x,.../:•,), -J... • . r , ,..-4,7-16,-, • • ' ;'; 4 . .: 0 c l.fi•!,F.;• 1 -;-.: • . • a' .6. .' . . • 4 t • 4 7• A 1 3 1 .■•• • '' -• .• • • - ' • ....''' • • . r ' . , - - . • r .:"411,5, • ' I •• • . 4 ‘ NI N is. i . - . • ' ..: ••: :J.?..::.:..; ;.-., . 1 •-. ... 4 ot . ..7= '..ii:. 7 ; .• • ••■• • • • ' •• • ' 2 i 'Vi ',' ....' ... • • . • J. • 0 .. . • , • -, • 4 •■•• .• .: r: ' - • - ..- . . .. ' ., 1, .:-.• 1, ..! are . -4 a,, ,...-...,.- .;,;„.• • • , , . .. . • . .. .... - . . . . , . . - . r F. 's • •• • 1 . . . . .. - .1 ..:Aft 1. ...!;...* • .. 1 . t • :. :, . .y1.1: 1 - • xr , . I -.i.- ..... . . • . .. 1 0 1 .. 1 :i• v .: _ . • , _ • ... : .:—,3t-..z.,.. .... .. . - . ) ;":.V . -:,,i4 . -•••••:. - e.kvr. 1 .:!' . . , ..r.:.......; r . - . 7 e!tiiXi it" -.--;':`,...•':* • • '1 • 41 1••::, 1 .41{ ; .k .r ...1.ii ' t' i '. F 1.Ir.P;PO.C? ..,!./. ! I 1 ; . ,!: • t.... . • •'•••:. r •.-: ! • • = . :'': . ...... ... . . .• , . • • '' ..-ii . . • --. .,. . • . t Oe ._ .. . •• .. .! ,,, • f 4. 4 .. '.‘ • 1 I • ' .... ""i" :.'" '. ; . i•tili. • • .. ''•;• • • . :, • 4 • , ..- ;: .- • ' • . au. IlL• , .....• - • '; 7 - • A , . ": 4fi LI :;1?' • • • - • . : '•if • . : : -'. . . i N I.: f c 4•4 • ' - ' - • • ; . • - • .t .- .• ' . I ... .:. e. • . • • -71P • ; S. 4 k' :! • • '!°•_. N ''," .... •' .....' . - .:( • 1 : .*- ' . • - - -*ilk,. . .. . • • 1 , r,i. -.. • .• ■ • • , •).. • ,, , P • t . ,.* ..4 • • • I , 1,, , ' . ° . ' 4 ..7 J1 6•• 74' , • • •*. .1 ■.. • • . V ,,,.. ... f 4 s ; . .b . , • i l i iii : ., . V • -: • • . • . . • • .. vr% - ' -si J • - • • is•If . • f • .... ,: ' 1 " lb. . • . 1 • . • •. 1. • . 41..- t•irlit,. Via - --- •''• ..-. .'--.•'•••••.,,,...,/,,,,,,,_.: -.I .••• •-•-•:•,•"•:,,,,..,,,,-,,,,,,,, ..., y. --..-.-. • •- .. .-.. • .4., • -_,s. • .....,.. ,Fi- ... , .f . • ...' //,:',.;•," ; ..• . • •. I ''' . . ' i • . • 6 t .. . • 1.1,), t .,. , , .." .111111■111r, val. .a..• . . .- . ■ - . .. . •• • ; .I . • . • "; . I P.. '., " ' ' ,.1. . • • • . • . )1* . lit tr. - v‘7. . . • • . " . - • • .., f -. . ••• • . - ,. . .... - .--.. ' . . ... • • - - . . . . _ . .... - --- # SITE # SITE wtst LOOKING NORTH AT SITE LOOK ING AT SITE 0 • iweocom SP 9014 -Din Features: - � ` < � ': • - 3� _ �N• ; - tql . El Small Size ►'' ' ¢' `' °4� : i�uu .."--r q... :, • " 1 .:,. .. c � lr ,x.� `t' 1 •Y4 ,• S , s'''' r ' p. - r : .:: -AN . ". N. t k`� ^ ' ' .:.7‘.v.. .� • 9C ❑ Aesthetically Pleasing ' ",, :r. ` '; ; j - C . ,� 1 t 1 . . r''''' ` � i. - y b Ci a .i`S7r ` ^a y ' i �* ' + • . : i « ' * it : ' (z; '-1 . A y 1 i 9 . r r.} it i T , ,, r. .r i 7 El Suitable For TDMA/CDMA t { t t ,' .'` ° 4 �' - c . E � ` ' 71: , + Z : : '+r. is 4•.` K ' r'' x i ,,� �,ti r 4 d.. ,t'... ;, rya �. t J : ;i E`•. �, :.Y 4 ❑ High Return Loss `: ` &t' ?' 4 „� �.. ii. ::i .,-.4 , • Y t w... .... yeti ❑ Low Intermodulation ,'..'.3,-q7,;',-.--tr.:- , t,..1; ' "r''-'11 � 1� �•u a } aC; 5 .' + r ;:"? 33.46 in ❑ Good FTB � 7 �” �j f''a • 850 mm ❑ Broadbanded if " ..�, ,, . 1 ,. 'f` 2.76 in � t'" l d t 70 mm • ❑ Side -lobe Suppression ;-'"?..c."...'-'4'1,-..,-: , r '� t.; • [ 'tr ; . • The distance between the center i' - al' r. - ' of the bolts (on the back of the antenna) �.;VTfa, , ' ' , ^ a ❑ Sturdy Design t r t , t. are shown in the drawing above. 'a •:� X1 . 4 i '. Bolt diameter is 3/8 -16 El Down-Tilt Brackets Incl. ` - 4: ' ■ 't.',-,,, .:9*,; [comes with lock nut]. - Frequency Range: 1850 -1990 MHz Overall Height: 42 in 1067 mm] Impedance: 50 ohm Width: 4.5 in 114 mm] Connector Type: 7/16 Din Depth: 4.25 in 108 mm) Return Loss: 20 dB Weight Including Tilt- Brackets: 16 lbs 7.3 Kg] Polarization: Vertical Rated Wind Velocity: 113 mph 180 Km/h] Gain: 14 dBd Wind Area (CxA/Front): 1.33 sq. ft. 0.12 sq.m] Front To Back Ratio: > 25 dB Lateral Thrust At Rated Wind Side -Lobe Suppression: 18 dB Worst Case: 68 lbs 304 N] Intermodulation (2x25W): IM3 > 146 dB IM5 > 153 dB IM7 /9> 163 dB i Power Rating: 200 W H -Plane ( -3 dB point): 84 -88 ° Radiating Elements: Aluminum V -Plane ( -3 dB point): 7 -9 ° Extrusion: Aluminum Lightning Protection: DC Grounded Radome: Grey PVC Tilt- Bracket: Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Antenna Bolts: Stainless Steel The SP 9014 -Din is made in U.S.A. • • Swedcom • SP 9014 -Din c Features: = x > ; : r � r . . v _ �._ - 6 ,' .r: • : .,tom -: . •.:. ''' - �' yC; ❑ Small Size - + = 1; h `. g : • Vt. _ •• , � ``Y` r i ` .11•♦ . „,, i ry e µ ti -... , 0 ': w.s 'R o , j } .` + ? l J • Aesthetically Pleasing A,j , - � ;;fir }:::t �� �_ °. = r� , j j dot i r � � 4•: f ` , .. • 1 ❑ Suitable For TDMA /CDMA ° `• ,: ° 3r Y' '''' :; x " ; °4. . ... ' I i ,' • : } a pt � �, f�a; ! ( y!e 1 •,}' : ....4‘,. : r H e 44 kL * {. `.— R 1 p 16 ' :7 _4 " ,,:' A+ t, a_.. ,a_ • .u..... J � ... Loss 's!, ST• 1 ?�,,�? 4 �' 4 .T`:1 ' 't ! ��•: ieil,•in�� :\' } . ❑ High Return =' � ' ` ' y, t+ • i `eii.. A ) 0 Low Intermodulation ,,T�,� �:,,i, � � _ , ,�, S?F . eta "'1 `i1:' ',S ' • El / 33.46 in Good FTB ) _ti !.. 850 mm ❑ r „,° °#1 i , " ...1f.s;te '1'se / ‘ • t 4 j j • t i S, • .f 2.76 in Broadbanded :: :1,- �t � r • , V y~ •{ , ) • ` 1 . 70 mm a � arY < � l ' 3 ' t s v t ,r i T i� N 4 ,-- a. � r its- 4: 'cS ` •' r r 4 t " :A „ tw fh r � I ❑ Sid -lobe Suppression - The distance between the center r = ' —.„ of the bolts (on the back of the antenna) ❑ Sturdy Design 44 . % 1 �+; � ” b {Y are shown in the drawing above. .' . +Pi.s 1 r r. 1 �' r 4 - 0 tir i : v 'k ;� Bolt diameter is 3/8 -16 ❑ Down -Tilt Brackets Incl. � I� . ' , € , ` = r [comes with lock nut]. Q Q 0 • ;•.-.1. , • Frequency Range: 1850 -1990 MHz Overall Height: 42 in 1067 mm] 0 Impedance: 50 ohm Width: 4.5 in 114 mm] Connector Type: 7/16 Din Depth: 4.25 in 108 mm] O Return Loss: 20 dB Weight Including Tilt - Brackets: 16 lbs 7.3 Kg] Polarization: Vertical Rated Wind Velocity: 113 mph 180 Km/h] B Gain: 14 dBd Wind Area (CxA/Front): 1.33 sq. ft. 0.12 sq.m] Front To Back Ratio: > 25 dB Lateral Thrust At Rated Wind ■ Side -Lobe Suppression: 18 dB Worst Case: 68 lbs 304 NI Intermodulation (2x25W): IM3 > 146 dB 1 IM5 >153dB 1 , IM7 /9> 163 dB ='-'= :'a ' : B Power Rating: 200 W' H -Plane ( -3 dB point): 84 -88 ° Radiating Elements: Aluminum 0 V -Plane ( -3 dB point): 7 -9 ° Extrusion: Aluminum Lightning Protection: DC Grounded Radome: Grey PVC I Tilt- Bracket: Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Antenna Bolts: Stainless Steel t The SP 9014 -Din is made in U.S.A. I I Swedcom • SP 9014 -Din Features: s 1 n , ;z . ..... . � } r tmn j ' i , • 0 Small Size Vf ' , ', -- : . .. ,' " � . 5 ' rK : y ' t. �, _ �,1. _`� $+ 4,;,i,-. '. � i VUUUIi � 11 � 1 'l.l:,. ` .Fi�' I'.4 t. ,� ads. � _ `i.. "" •q `t � Aesthetically :.. � 0 Aest Pleasing €`,.4e ;; ti ..,074-..,;-. • 4' • t 1.1`.• 1 F 1 � • r }f t o N i y t' Sew * 5 :',;:r ? , M , „°�,+ -' � 4 4.,E;',- 'i . „n4 f iE '{ yid' .. . ,„ v_ , 1.' f t � •• �:�: 4 . • Suitable For TD �� z . try , , t tv. ' ,., •''`, ' ° Y .14 Hig 4 *;. ..i' . ` 4 , 4 f � ■ 4 t • ,e: ` t :, : t , ) _o. L..`%' -' q - . •", rf; 3' I gh Return Loss •�/ ,A - . a , r' { f Y , �: y .,. ..; p,x J '' • 3 i•J F '•} V'•0 F : 1 :dr'_. Ya ^f.S Y-> w.t...tS.ih w e '' 9 'j' , 4 S • L • ow Intermodulation `� '=" tfi r'• ~ 'ii i 5 'G ik � hF 5 . 4 a `c " \.• . o Good FTB , r,, , lt,• • 4 � i s +; .a . a S ,.• ° 33.46 in ❑ x,? , L S + fix; � i 850 mm Broadbanded s a ' +� i + 4 f k> {� i . t'+ S ,:. „1 l fi]t .' . �, -1. %43, 1 , ,,i. 2.76 in - * :1 Y ' ` t +« 4 ``Si d, 'i 70 mm e ; , I t] Side -lobe ,44-4, Suppressio 'u > � 4 , ` . ; .44, }° ` ., The distance between the center ... %” u1/ Sturdy Design t o , ' i i.;,; ' of the bolts (on the back of the antenna) ±., � . `'. za + are shown the drawing bov e, in th awin a 0 Down-Tilt `` " �' D t Brack Incl. ! 3 w ��' •Pt' '' .., Bolt diameter is 3/8 -16 • � ` ' ` [comes with lock nut]. Frequency Range: 1850 -1990 MHz Impedance: Overall Height: 42 in 50 ohm Width: 1 mmJ 4.5 in 114 mm] Connector Type: 7/16 Din Return Loss: Depth: 4.25 in 20 dB Wei ht g 108 mmJ Polarization: Vertical g Includin Tilt- Brackets: 16 lbs 7.3 Kg] Gain: Rated ind Velocity: 113 mph 180 Km/h] Front To Back Ratio: 14 dBd Wind Area (CxA/Front >25 dB ) 1.33 sq. ft. 0.12 sq.m] Side -Lobe Suppression: Lateral Thrust At Rated Wind Intermodulation 2x25W : 18 3 > 146 dB Worst Case: ( ) 11143 68 lbs 1304 >\ 1 1 1 45 >153 IM7 /9 > 163 dB 1 Power Rating: • !: . H -Plane ( -3 dB point): 200 W : P ) 84 -88 o r V -Plane ( -3 dB point): 7 _ 9 o Radiating Elements: Aluminum Lightning Protection: Extrusion: Aluminum DC Grounded Radome: Grey PVC Tilt- Bracket: Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Antenna Bolts: Stainless Steel The SP 9014 -Din is made in U.S.A. • • 11418fiC0111 9014 -Din .� , - �`- - T ', . tea 'tam- p-.... Yti .. • atures: • °� -. P�4 `a ► 4 t� k <: t �r� �. �e py(, ,µ �.- .�. • Sµ - i` # .‘"* t 4 `..:. : .« 1 ' , h ' ' ' _ � , . -A. j am : I Size , ,. . �, , r � ; .: ' `: :. „k�•� , � �,,, �etically Pleasing '� ;, � ': j".',411. 'P . "� :.",, 7 i ~ `1'. ` j i ? 3 ra. g y v A ., f �4'? .�'�� ."t4 „ 4 ,,'2, rte . 'r. ble For DMA/CDM . :; . .. - •;':.'.. - . - ...-. ' ` ' ..,.::,,,,,,,,,'",it,:::‘,..;,... ,, k ,: , `' rkv ,'- 3ii' ` ;# ,, m • 4 ' e ,' - 1. T, y .., . .l ; t+ i , : , �� , Return - r � * r , w „....,".,...:'....--.'.-t‘ , � ,,, , Loss < • 1 Sa l= % "' a }y , 4?� 4 . , 4cr>. T ..� . JJ;;ee,, .�' • { �, ii7� � . + d1aJ.. tS .f.C�}.u?I ,. r � - �S f ntermodulation ' `' Y� r"ts, � � � 7 1 �j��..., # fits' , M. .,, 5 � • TB , fi • ; g g ' , J, 4 1 ` w 4 :, tk t >=-' � , N / PL l ' , ..3:/,? . ,, , ,". , - a + , t r ' ; i; cl 33.46 h banded rte' } r >1 } f r q l+: 850 mm f / y ,,..14 ' . z. , 'L'` ,r 1 � a a a� � 70 in �eSuppression r � f. .�f. rE r 0 : x v, , i • ,- . : # � ii.4 ---- . The distance between the center Design �+ y 4 �� ° „ , of the bolts (on the back of the antenna) , , 1,- are shown in the draw �, V0'.4 t , "' f , drawing above. ilt Brackets Incl. `'" �" ""' Y � ' : 3/8 -16 : .F, •:,:. i . : a. ,,•, , : , . B di ameter "' [comes with lock nut]. MIMI -...r• .i ,-. ' ,•:.. -..:.1..,..:... :....:t ': 1 850 -1990 MHz 50 ohm Overall Height: Width: 42 in [1067mmJ 7/16 Din 4.5 in 1114 mm] 20 dB Depth: Weight Including Tilt- Brackets: 16lbsn [108 gJ Vertical Rated Wind Velocity: [ KgJ 113 mph [180 Km/h tio: > 25 dB J 14dBd Find Area (CxA/Front): 1 .33 sq. ft. [0.12 sq.m] scion: 18 dB Lateral Thrust At Rated Wind Worst Case: "x25 W): IM3 > 146 dB 681bs 1304 NJ IM5 > 153 dB i IM >163dB nt): 84-88 ° F it): 7 _ 9 o Extrusion: Radiating Elements: Aluminum ': DC Grounded Radome: Aluminum n Tilt- Bracket: Grey PVC Antenna Bolts: Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Stainless Steel The SP 9014 -Din is made in U.S.A. Swedc • • .. .11.s : ∎ 010 ,..,,.. . ti, 44- '45,64",'r.-:,7-1,...,,,,;_•.:,. • ..r. :,- ,- ttit . . , v,re..-4 ' :44,40,...;,-,71+:,:..--01. *al ',..1: .'" "- -4:. 4,:i:;;,,,, . Y` E h ' L 33.4 in ,.- �:'` 85.4 mm ,. 4n f. 2. in � . . 70 mm kkkkk"```��� the center �, A-- The distance between of the bolts (on the back of t h e a ntenna) are shown in the drawing Bolt diameter is: 3/8-1 2 [comes with lock nut]. Wi 42 in ]1067 mml ieight: 4.5 in ]114 mml 4.25 in ]108 mml 16 lbs ]7.3 Kg] .ncluding Tilt- Brackets: 1 s .3 K 1 ;ind Velocity: 1.33 sq. ft. 10.12 sq.ml Thrust At Rated Find 68 lbs 1304 N] • �ase: 10"Ti . Aluminum .ring Elements: Aluminum M Grey PVGalvanized Steel Br a: Hot Dip - Bracket: Stainless Steel cnna Bolts: The SP 9014 -Din is made in U.S.A. Swedcom SP 9014 -Din F • • _ C i ' ,.:F . ... = .. : - - r: � i .. • ❑ Small Size `1, 'i%/. ' ., ;`••- r 1 , ' I L. , u� . _ "`.'. , • n ;Ara• ,�,r F ti '� . • ( a ., ` ` +„ -;:,'";' + t , , .i, t.. • ❑ Aesthetically Pleasing rk ; *v "t = ` ' ? � � . x E '" • 1 w 4,... R.� 'k 7w w. r `7 aQ j j '�; • + {, ..,, ' ■ z, '. •.A;i r °• ❑ Suitable For TDMA /CDMA �V .� � `' { ` y 9 � t yy " ` ; `-- 1C-11. I. I 0 High Return Loss i4 s A it }�•3�' F 1,9.4(,:... , :k� ;,, .,. �: r , Y � :1:0....r... . n ❑ Low Intermodulation ~� r ''' ,t "'' • t r, • :r 1 � R, � } � } n I ❑ Good FTB , ,;r,�'., , `y 1 . : - _ y : 5 ^* : 8 m • '� ' ' t' * + . i l t 850 mm I ; • Via. kt i 5¢ {c C . r -r r i �, kd� ° . "� " z 2.76 in r = " �•, 3, ,, . L , ' , � 7o mm ® ❑ Broadbanded ,j a i +' . +, i• , , X :. • ' y . „ rte ,{:' . • rs . '' ' < . r `,. r . rc - '' r-- . -A J , , i .. ` , -1 The distance between the center 1 ❑ Side -lobe Suppression 4rt7yj , - k' ::' of the bolts (on the back of the antenna) 1 ❑ Sturdy Design ,, ., ; ”, are shown in the drawing above. I ..# » Bolt diameter is 3/8 -16 ❑ Down -Tilt Brackets Incl. ' .' [comes with lock nut]. I 1 1 1 Frequency Range: 1850 -1990 MHz Overall Height: 42 in 1067 mm] I Impedance: 50 ohm Width: 4.5 in 114 mmJ Connector Type: 7/16 Din Depth: 4.25 in 108 mm] I Return Loss: 20 dB Weight Including Tilt - Brackets: 16 lbs 7.3 KgJ Polarization: Vertical Rated Wind Velocity: 113 mph 180 Km/h] 1 Gain: 14 dBd Wind Area (CxA/Front): 1.33 sq. ft. 0.12 sq.m] Front To Back Ratio: >25 dB Lateral Thrust At Rated Wind 1 Side -Lobe Suppression: 18 dB Worst Case: 68 lbs 304 NJ Intennodulation (2x25W): IM3 > 146 dB IM5 >153dB . IM7 /9 >163dB 1 `'`, 1 Power Rating: 200 V1' H -Plane ( -3 dB point): 84 -88 ° Radiating Elements: Aluminum 9 V -Plane ( -3 dB point): 7 -9 ° Extrusion: Aluminum Lightning Protection: DC Grounded Radome: Grey PVC 0 Tilt - Bracket: Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Antenna Bolts: Stainless Steel 1 The SP 9014 -Din is made in U.S.A. 1 1 0 410 Swedcom SP 9014 —Din 1t� `. .r- t� �tDr.n '.t p•�- ...,t_:. y. i. H�'`X � § Mb .- , r d h Features: µ Vi � N' t ,�{ , + > . .... ;,� �� .. F • El Small Size ,.: �', . i. ; }V�'w, ` � ` `t i '• i ill ❑ Aesthetically Pleasing pT.• t` t . , •. , :; ;,• , 1 ❑ Suitable For TDMA/CDMA ti ! : ° ., , ., k ;• '4!; `; . ' < .> jai I, * s 1 0 High Return Loss ; Y F ,� N '. r t __ A. i t II.. L ' " ❑Low Intermodulation " , ' rY ' n 1 }yZ fir ,kr 33.46 in ❑ Good FT B ° i `! r "'n % . y r '' 850 mm • I ��� Z• % h v 2.76 in 1 ❑ Broadbandedz r .,', fl y �v 0,4,-4 ` !t. [[i � � �, a tiT. �� rig, r ... it r 70 mm S w�K : * y ,. `"� K, 1., ? ri < ❑ Side -lobe Suppression �. t `c 'tFiM , The distance between the center x� t i S . w- _'A.... A i .,E v ,' Ati , of the bolts (on the back of the antenna) ❑ Sturdy Design vtia ° - •A'`-''�' t,, � - . � y ',, are shown in the dr above. ❑ Down -Tilt Brackets Incl. ..,..,%.2.-.'R... ' —' . �'' . . Bolt diameter is: 3/8 -16 - ' , 1..- [comes with lock nut). I I a 1 Frequency Range: 1850 -1990 MHz Overall Height: 42 in 1067 mm] 11 Impedance: 50 ohm Width: 4.5 in 114 mm] Connector Type: 7/16 Din Depth: 4.25 in 108 mm] I Return Loss: 20 dB Weight Including Tilt - Brackets: 16 lbs 7.3 Kg] Polarization: Vertical Rated Wind Velocity: 113 mph 180 Km /h] 1 Gain: 14 dBd Wind Area (CxA/Front): 1.33 sq. ft. 0.12 sq.m] Front To Back Ratio: > 25 dB Lateral Thrust At Rated Wind 1 Side -Lobe Suppression: 18 dB Worst Case: 68 lbs 304 N] intermodulation (2x25W): IM3 > 146 dB a 11%15 > 153 dB j . IM7 /9 >163dB i •... r;,:;- I Power Rating: 200 \V' . H -Plane ( -3 dB point): 84 -88 ° Radiating Elements: Aluminum 3 V -Plane ( -3 dB point): 7 -9 ° Extrusion: Aluminum Lightning Protection: DC Grounded Radomc: Grey PVC 0 Tilt- Bracket: Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Antenna Bolts: Stainless Steel I The SP 9014 -Din is made in U.S.A. I I • • [ USWEST Communications Wireless 3950 NE 122 Ave. Room 221 Portland, Oregon 97230 (303) 231 -7435 Office (503) 231 -8319 Fax (503) 302.6988 Cellular (800) 238 -0000 Pager Pin M 2585312 March 9, 1997 • David Siegel, AI.C.P. Account Manager 8.105 SW Nimbus Ave. Beaverton, OR. 97008 -7120 Dear Dave: The purpose of this letter is to identify that in the county of Clackamas, and the cities of Tigard & Hillsboro, the Walter Group is no longer processing any zoning applications on behalf of USWEST Wireless. These responsibilities have been reassigned to W&H Pacific. This letter also authorizes you to sign, on behalf of USWEST, any planning and permitting documents being prepared by W&H Pacific, Inc., for submittal to obtain the necessary permits for the development of our PCS communications facilities. 3711/ct• Stephen P. Ma or Date Market Real Estate Manager, Portland OR. USWEST Communications Wireless E 11J` f1fl OFFiCIA� SEAL ? USA ANGST NOTARY FLUX- OREGON (Notary) COMMISSION NO.021654 MMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 3a 1997 l Y./ ./l�O�ll./Yll./yl1J l Date • Commission Expires Anil I CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0004 Eti FILE TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE 5 \` APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum, L.P. OWNER: City of Tigard Don deBlanc, Property Manager Water Department 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg. F 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tualatin, OR 97062 Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 612 -1017 (503) 639 -4171 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30. X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: T.B.A. TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639 -4171 x317 CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • � 3/� q CS kc) A■ .`56a-V CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY C/� CASE NO .(� Cn OTHER CASE NO',S:_ RECEIPT NO. (-.7 --- j :?2� APPLICATION ACCEPTED ,BY: �� DATE: � - C� ����////� 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Applitiom elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION 8777 SW Burnham St. k lA) application form (l) t �QeGP Tigard , OR 97223 %....- Owner's signature /written - j TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. Tax Lot 2100 24 authorization r a (� Go o� �s✓au� Map 2S 102 AD (C) Title trafisfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 4.659 acres 'Asti �, Q (D) Assessor's map (1) � •PERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* City of Tigard, Water Dis w (pre-app.checklist) k ist �wc�lq . (E) Site plan (pre -app.checklist) ADDRESS 8777 SW Burnham St PHONE (503)639 - 4171 (F) Applicant's statement CITY Tigard, OR ZIP 97223 1�.� ap pff he c k lis�t�1 � - /j <wd v � APPLICANT* Sprint Spe ('trnw LP Pj i(G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 7770 SW Mohawk. PHONE addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Tualatin OR ZIP (503) 612 - 1017 (H) Filing fee ($365) *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DI/ INED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written 6 // 7 76 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this / application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN /ZONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY (&C f la. .Q The owners of record of the subject property r - 1 request conditional use approval to allow N.- .41 T-: E iF A Personal Communication Services (PCS) Hearings Officer Approval Date: wifeless communication facility consisting of antennas mounted on a 100 ft.monopole and • - •• •, - - the Final Approval Date: 411 base of the tower. This monopole will allow for the collocation of another carrier's Planning communication antenna. Approval is requested for uD to two facilities on this monopole. Engineering 0736P/23P Rev'd: 3/88 3. List any variance, sensitive lands permit, or other land use actions to be 4 considered as part of this application: 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments • described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 20th day of May 1996 411 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. (See Attached) Exhibit lc (KSL:pm /0736P) • • I CITY OF TIGARD CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION AND EXHIBITS 1. a. Vicinity Map b. Site Plan c. Owner's Signature d. Title Transfer Instrument 2. FCC License 3. Engineering Affidavit 4 Antenna Specifications 5. a. Mailing b. Mailing Affidavit c. Mailing List 6. a. Posting b. Posting Affidavit 7. Aerial Photograph 8. Cabinet Photograph • • ill Sprint Spectrum L.P. 22 May 1996 APPLICANT : Sprint Spectrum L.P. Don deBlanc, Property Manager 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg. F Tualatin, OR 97062 Telephone: 503 - 612 -1017 REPRESENTATIVE: VCI, Inc. Heather Kesten, Program Manager 7160 Hazelfern Road, Suite 100 Tigard, OR 97224 III Telephone: 503 -598 -1880 Fax: 503 -598 -1889 PROPERTY OWNER: City of Tigard Water Department 8777 SW Burnham St Tigard, OR 97223 Telephone: 503 - 639 -4171 Fax: 503 - 684 -7297 SITE DESCRIPTION : Tax Lot 2100, Map 2S 102 AD 4.659 acres (portion) 1600 square feet lease area LAND USE DESIGNATION: Central Business District (CBD) REQUEST: Conditional Use Approval Review for a Personal Communication Services (PCS) wireless communication facility consisting of antennas mounted on a 100 ft monopole and six electronic equipment cabinets near the base of the tower. The monopole is capable of carrying a second panel array 10 feet below the panel array at the top of the structure. This will allow a collocation in the future rather than construction of a second pole. Approval is requested for up to two III communication facilities on this monopole. • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 2 I. APPLICABLE STANDARDS A. Tigard Municipal Code 1. 18.66 Central Business District (CBD) 2. 18.100 Landscaping and Screening 3. 18.102 Visual Clearance 4. 18.106 Off- Street Parking and Loading Requirements 5. 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation 6. 18.114 Signs 7. 18.130 Conditional Use 8. 18.164 Street and Utility Improvement Standards B. Tigard Comprehensive Plan 1. Policy 2 Citizen Input 2. Policy 4 Water Quality 3. Policy 7 Public Utilities 4. Policy 8 Street Improvements 5. Policy 12 Location Criteria 411 II. FINDINGS PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Sprint Spectrum is requesting approval to construct and operate a "personal communication services" (PCS) facility at 8777 SW Burnham St, Tigard (Exhibit 1). The PCS site will consist of twelve panel antennas mounted on a 100 ft tower, and six steel equipment cabinets measuring 30 inches wide x 30 inches deep x 60 inches tall mounted on an 8 ft. x 18.5 ft. concrete slab. The equipment cabinets contain the power supply, backup batteries, and radio communications equipment necessary for a wireless personal communication services system. The proposed PCS facility will be situated on a 40 ft. x 40 ft. area leased from the owners of tax lot 2100, City of Tigard. Personal Communication Services (PCS) technology is the newest form of wireless communication service. Sprint Spectrum obtained one of the two licenses available for the Portland Major Trading Area (MTA) from the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) in March of 1995. Sprint Spectrum is comprised of four major corporations: Sprint Corporation, Telecommunications Incorporated (TCI), Cox Communications, and Comcast Corporation. The Portland MTA covers the western two- thirds of the state of Oregon and southwest Washington, including the City of Vancouver. By granting a license, the FCC has authorized and obligated Sprint Spectrum to provide a certain level of PCS services in the Portland MTA. (See Exhibit 2) • • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 3 As a licensee authorized by the Federal Communication Commission to provide PCS services in this region, Sprint Spectrum must establish a network of PCS sites in the metropolitan area and beyond. Each PCS site will consist of transmitting and receiving antennas mounted on a communication tower or other suitable structure; electronic equipment cabinets; radios for receiving and transmitting wireless communications; and extensive electronic equipment to operate the radios, interface with other PCS sites, provide connections to the land -line telephone network, and link the cell site with the Personal Communication Switching Center (PCSC). In order to meet the basic level of operational radio signal coverage, Sprint Spectrum radio frequency engineers are designing a network of PCS sites for the Portland MTA. Specific sites are chosen after lengthy analysis by the applicant's engineers. Selection criteria include: limitations imposed by surrounding topography, the intended service area of the PCS site, and the ability of the new site to "see" other sites in the network from its proposed location. Other selection factors include suitable access, availability of electrical service, and a willing property lessor. Where the necessary design criteria can be met, colocation with existing telecommunication facilities is a preferred option. Only after careful analysis of many candidates and successful lease negotiations have been completed is a land use application such as this one submitted. PCS sites or "base stations" operate at radio frequencies between 1870 and 1965 Megahertz (MHz.) The base stations will transmit between 1950 and 1965 MHz at a maximum power level of 56 watts effective radiated power (ERP) (See Exhibit 3). This power level is much lower than existing 800 MHz cellular service, which typically transmits at power levels of several hundred watts ERP and higher. A typical PCS • base station site will have an array of up to twelve panel antennas. The antennas will measure 63 inches high, 6 inches wide and 2 inches deep (Exhibit 4). Six steel cabinets will house the radio equipment and power supplies. Each equipment cabinet measures approximately 60 inches high, 30 inches wide, and 30 inches deep. The PCS site is a passive use and will have no impact on other properties in the surrounding area. The facilities are unmanned. After an initial construction period of 30 to 45 days, the only traffic generated will be for routine maintenance visits, typically once or twice a month. There are no activities that will produce airborne emissions, odor, vibration, heat, glare, or noxious and toxic materials. All equipment and materials needed to operate the site are located in the equipment cabinets. The cabinets do not require air conditioning units and will be cooled by interior fans, thus keeping noise levels to a minimum. The PCS site does not require water or sanitary facilities and therefore will generate no wastewater. The PCS communication network will provide extensive benefits to the public by enhancing wireless communication. Beyond common day to day service, subscribers, including public safety agencies such as police and fire, will have access to enhanced communication services during such times as power outages and natural disasters that may disrupt or disable land line communications. • • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 4 III. A. Tigard Municipal Code The following sections of the Tigard Municipal Code are applicable to this application: 1. 18.66. Central Business District (CBD) 18.66.040 Conditional Uses (See Chapter 18.130) A. Conditional Uses Within the Central Business District: 4. Utilities The hearings officer has previously found that a cellular telephone antenna and accessory structures is a communication utility allowed under 18.64.040(A)(3) [CaseNumber CUP 94- 0003/VAR 94- 0002]. 18.66.050 Dimensional Requirements: Nonresidential Uses The proposed facility, by definition, is exempt from height limitations in the Tigard Code (18.98.90A). 2. 18.100 Landscaping and Screening • 18.100.030 Street Trees The proposed facility will be located at the back of Tax Lot 2100 at least 100 feet away from any public or private street. Therefore, street trees are not required. 18.100.080 Buffering /Screening Requirements The PCS Site is located at the back of Tax Lot 2100 which is used as a service yard. It is completely separated visually and physically from the public areas by brick (courtyard) walls, fences and buildings.The property just to the west has a stand of evergreen trees which shield and screen the monopole from public view from Commercial Street. 18.100.090 Setbacks for Fences or Walls The PCS site will be enclosed by a view obscuring six foot chain link wooden slatted fence which is inside the brick (courtyard) walls. The fence will meet setback requirements in a Central Business District. 3. 18.102 Clear Vision Area As shown on Exhibit 1, access to this facility will be from the entry driveway on Burnham St side of Tax Lot 2100. No landscaping or obstructions will be placed within the area defined by Section 18.102.030(A). Ill • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 5 4. 18.106 Off - Street Parking and Loading Requirements The Community Development Code does not specify a parking ratio for this type of use. The leased space is approximately 1600 square feet and is unstaffed. Parking space is needed once or twice a month when a maintenance technician visits the site. Parking for the maintenance vehicle is available in the current parking lot. 5. 18.108 Access, Egress, and Circulation Access to the facility will be via a 50 ft wide access gate from Burnham St. on the south side of Tax Lot 2100. This access driveway connects directly to a fully developed and paved parking lot. Except during work days and hours, the gate is kept locked. 6. 18.114 Signs No signs are proposed for this facility. 7. 18.130 Conditional Use 18.130.040 Approval Standards and Conditions A. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with • conditions, or deny an application for a conditional use or to enlarge or alter a conditional use based on findings of fact with respect to each of the following criteria: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; According to Section 18.66.050 (A), the Central Business District has no minimum lot size, lot width or set back requirements for a non - residential use. The proposed steel pole is 100 feet tall. Section 18.66.050(A)(4) limits building height in the CBD district to 80 feet. However, Section 18.98.010(A) allows utility towers to exceed the maximum height limit of the CBD district. Section 18.66.060(A)(5) limits site coverage by buildings and other impervious surfaces to 85 per cent. The PCS site will occupy only 1600 square feet out of the total lot area of 202,985 square feet. • • • Tigard PCS Site Conditional Use Application Page 6 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features; As discussed under (1) above, Tax Lot 2100 can easily accommodate the small improvements proposed by Sprint Spectrum. As viewed in Exhibit 1, the property houses the Tigard Water District Operations Center in two buildings. It is flat and has no significant natural features to consider in site development. The PCS site will be located in a business zone, and is geographically situated to meet the engineering objectives for providing improved PCS coverage along the Hall Blvd corridor between Tigard and Beaverton. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal; Access, telephone service and electric power are the only public facilities required by the proposed use. No personnel will be stationed at the site. The PCS site is operated and monitored by remote control from the Mobile Switching Center. The equipment cabinets have no water or bathroom facilities and is not designed to house employees. The utility cabinets are intended only to enclose and protect the radios and electronics. Therefore, water and sewer connections are not necessary. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter; All applicable requirements of the zoning district are addressed in this application. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114, Signs, and Section 18.120.180, Approval Standards, if applicable, are met; No signs are proposed for the PCS site. 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the comprehensive plan. See Section (C) below. The following provisions of Section 18.120.180(A) are applicable to this conditional use: 1. Provisions of the following chapters: a. ...Sensitive Lands There are no sensitive lands inventoried on the property, therefore these provisions are not applicable. c. ...Density Computations • No housing development is associated with this development, therefore these provisions are not applicable. • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 7 d. ...Accessory Uses and Structures The PCS site is being reviewed as a primary use, therefore these provisions are not applicable. f. ...Building Height Limitations: Exceptions ' Section 18.98.010(A) allows utility towers to exceed the maximum height limit of the CBD district. g. ...Landscaping and Screening See Section 18.100 above. h. ...Visual Clearance Areas See Section 18.102 above. i. ...Off- Street Parking and Loading See Section 18.106 above. j. ...Access, Egress, and Circulation S See Section 18.108 above. k. ...Signs No signs are proposed for the PCS site. I. ...Tree Removal As indicated by Exhibit 1, there are no trees on Tax Lot 2100. Therefore, this provision does not apply. m. ...Street and Utility Improvement Standards See Section 18.164 below. 2. Relationship to the Natural and Physical Environment... The property is flat with no drainage or other natural features. The PCS site will be located in the northwest corner of Tax Lot 2100 and therefore will not interfere with any continued development of the remainder of the parcel. The PCS site is located near a stand of evergreen trees on the property to the west. 4. Buffering, Screening, and Compatibility between Adjoining Uses... The PCS site is located near a stand of evergreen trees on the property to the west . As shown on Exhibit 1, a chain link wooden slatted fence will screen the site from the streets. Because of this, the applicant hereby requests that the requirement for a landscape plan be waived. The PCS site is located behind bins of landscaping and paving material which the city uses on a regular basis. Since it is used for storage • of equipment and supplies, landscaping this site would be inappropriate to the use of this portion of the Tigard Water District's compound. • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 8 5. Privacy and Noise... Heating, ventilating and air conditioning apparatus will comply with DEQ noise regulations. 10. Crime Prevention and Safety... The site will be enclosed by a locked six foot chain link wooden slatted fence. The site is located inside a brick (courtyard) compound which is also locked except during work days and hours. 11. Access and Circulation... The site will have direct access onto a public street. 13. Parking... Parking will be provided on the current parking lot area. 14. Landscaping... • The applicant hereby requests that the requirement for a Landscape Plan be waived. The PCS site is located behind bins of landscaping and paving material which the city uses on a regular basis. Since it is used for storage of equipment and supplies, landscaping this site would be inappropriate to the use of this portion of the Tigard Water District's compound. 16. Provision for the Handicapped... This site is not accessible to the public nor is it a habitable structure. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 17. Signs... No signs are proposed for this PCS site. 8. 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 18.164.030 Streets Burnham Street on the south side of Tax Lot 2100 is fully improved as required for this street classification. 18.164.070 Sidewalks Burnham Street is improved with sidewalks as required for minor collector streets. • • • • Tigard PCS Site Conditional Use Application Page 9 18.164.080 Sanitary Sewers The equipment cabinets have no water or bathroom facilities and are not designed to house employees. They are utility cabinets, intended only to enclose and protect the radios and electronics. Therefore, water and sewer connections are not necessary. 18.164.100 Storm Drainage Paving of the PCS site would result in 1600 square feet of impervious surface. C. Tigard Comprehensive Plan 1) POLICY 2 CITIZEN INPUT Policy 2.1.1 provides that the City will assure that citizens will be provided an opportunity to participate in all phases of the planning and development process. In accordance with the City's Land Use Notification Process, the applicant will hold a neighborhood meeting on May 16, 1996. Letters were mailed to affected property owners and CIT members at least 2 weeks in advance, and a notice was posted on the property. An example of the mailing and posting are contained in Exhibits 5 and 6. 2) POLICY 4 WATER QUALITY . Policy 4.2.1 requires that all development within the Tigard urban planning area comply with applicable federal, state and regional water quality standards. Since no water service is needed at the cell site, this policy does not apply. 3) POLICY 7 PUBLIC UTILITIES Policies 7.1.2, 7.3.1, and 7.4.4 state the City will require as a condition of development approval that public water, sewer, and storm drainage will be provided and designed to City standards and that utilities shall be placed underground. As stated previously, sewer and water service are not needed for this development. Only electrical and telephone connections are necessary. These lines will be placed underground. 4) POLICY 8 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Policy 8.1.3 states that the City will require the following for all development: - adequate access - adequate street right -of -way - streets, curbs and sidewalks to City standards Access to the PCS facility will be via an existing, fully improved 50 foot wide access entry way at the south side of Tax Lot 2100. This access driveway connects directly to a fully paved parking lot. There is 35 feet of right -of -way from the centerline of Burnham along Tax Lot 2100. • Burnham Street is improved with sidewalks as required for minor collector streets. • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 10 5) POLICY 12 LOCATION CRITERIA 12.4 COMMUNITY UTILITIES AND FACILITIES The hearings officer has previously found that a cellular telephone antenna and accessory structures is a "minor impact utility" under Policy 12.4 (Case Number CUP 94- 0003NAR 94- 0002). 1. Minor Impact Utilities and Facilities A. Locational Criteria (1) Access The PCS site will access a parking lot which connects to Burnham Street, a minor collector. The facility will generate very little traffic and will not affect traffic patterns on surroundings streets. Since no personnel will be stationed at the site, no employees will be commuting to the property on a daily basis. The PCS site is operated and monitored by remote control from the Personal Communication Switching Center in Tigard. The cabinets are intended only to enclose and protect the radios and electronics and to provide a weather -proof enclosure for technicians while doing maintenance work, typically once or twice a month. After an initial construction period of several weeks, these infrequent maintenance trips will be the only traffic generated by the PCS site. • (2) Impact of the Proposed Change on Adjacent Lands The PCS site will have minimum impact on activities and uses on other properties in the surrounding area. The PCS facility is a passive use. There are no activities that will produce airborne emissions, odor, vibration, heat, glare, radioactive materials, or noxious and toxic materials. All equipment and materials needed to operate the site are located in the equipment cabinets. Heating, ventilating and air conditioning apparatus will comply with DEQ noise regulations. The PCS site does not require water or sanitary facilities and therefore will generate no waste water. As a result, the proposed PCS site will comply with all applicable environmental standards. The monopole and antenna configuration is designed to withstand 130+ mph winds as required by the Uniform Building Code and assumes a worst -case failure point at the ground base of the pole. PCS sites or "base stations" operates on FCC - approved radio frequencies between 1870 -1965 megahertz (MHz). The base stations will transmit between 1950 and 1965 MHz at a maximum power level of 56 watts effective radiated power (ERP). This power level is much lower than existing 800 MHz cellular service, which typically transmits at power levels of several hundred watts ERP and higher. A typical PCS base station site will have an array of up to twelve panel antennas. The antennas will measure 63 inches high, 6 inches wide and 2 inches deep. Six steel cabinets will house the radio equipment and power supplies. Each equipment cabinet measures approximately 60 inches high, 30 inches wide, and 30 inches deep. • • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 11 (3) Site Characteristics Tax Lot 2100 can easily accommodate the improvements proposed by Sprint Spectrum L. P. As viewed in Exhibit 1, the property is flat and has no significant natural features to consider in site development. The cell site will be located in a commercial zone, and is geographically situated to meet the engineering objectives for providing improved cellular coverage along the Scholls Ferry Road corridor between Tigard and Beaverton. The cellular communication facility has been sited so as not to interfere with future office development on the remainder of the property. The six equipment cabinets will take up a space of 148 square feet. A photograph of the cabinet is contained in Exhibit 8. Street light poles in the vicinity have a dark brown finish and trees behind the tower have dark trunks and foliage. The steel antenna pole can be painted a similar color to blend with the surrounding street poles and trees. The PCS site is located near a stand of evergreen trees on the property to the west. As shown on Exhibit 1, the site will be screened by a fence on all sides of the site and the entire site sits inside brick (courtyard) walls. • • • • Tigard PCS Site • Conditional Use Application Page 12 LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. a. Vicinity Map b. Site Plan 2. FCC License 3. Engineering Affidavit 4 Antenna Specifications 5. Mailing 6. Posting • 7. Aerial Photograph 8. Cabinet Photograph • „,,:,...4,4,4"4,4„,4„,,,,,,,,,,.......„xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx„„„„ „x„„xx„xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx„„x„ „ „,,,,,,,,,, ^i^^^” ..... -.1... : I : .-... : ...., ....„ ..i. I i ... ...! ;:::... ..,... _ : ... > : : ...,.... I !* .. :....... :. 4 ... „.,. I.. 1 : i , I i 0 ....`'' .... . : :.' .i .. ' .'." ;... . R * .1i4 411 .11.1 * • • • Vento Communications. Inc. 16 July 1996 Mark Roberts Planner Community Development Department 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 SUBJECT: TIGARD PCS SITE AT 8777 BURNHAM ST. In response to your request regarding the health and safety issues about Personal Communication Services (PCS), we have assembled the attached material to submit into the record. Radiofrequency Safety /. PCS base stations transmit on FCC - approved radio frequencies between 1950 and 1965 • megahertz. Sprint Spectrum's base stations transmit at an effective radiated power (ERP) of 56 watts, which is considered very low power for radio transmissions. At these power levels, the emissions from the proposed site will be far below current radio frequency standards adopted by • the City of Portland, Multnomah County and Washington County. The standards used by these three agencies are nearly identical and are considered by many to be model ordinances. Table B from the Washington County Development Code is attached as an example of the standards in common use (Exhibit 1). Further, the PCS installation will not cause any interference to radio and television reception in the area. Radio frequency emissions from antennas are calculated in units of microwatts per square centimeter (uW /cm The applicant's engineers have prepared calculations showing the Radiofrequency power density at various distances from the cell site (Exhibit 2). Table B stipulates that the equivalent planewave power density for a facility transmitting at 1950 Mhz cannot exceed 1000 microwatts per square centimeter. The power density chart indicates that the maximum power density from the site will be 0.0697 uW /cm These emissions will be well under the standards in Table B. //. Another aspect of important note is that photon energies in the fields or mircrowaves generated by PCS antennas are many times too weak to cause ionization thus the term nonionizing radiation. (Exhibit 3) Sincer -ly, Heat - : sten, Program nager 1111' 7160 SW HAZELFERN ROAD • SUITE 100 • TIGARD, OR • 97224 TEL: (503) 598 -1880 FAx: (503) 598 -1889 I S EXHIBIT 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY • RF EMISSION STANDARDS .. Mean Squared Mean Squared Equivalent Electric (E Magnetic (H Plane -Wave Field Strength Field Strength Power Density Frequency Range . (V /m (A /m (uw /cm 100KHz -3HHz 80,000 0.5 20,000 3MHz -30HHz 4,000(180/f 0.025(180/f 180,000 /f 30MHz- 300MHz 800 0.005 200 300HHz- 1500MHz 4,000(f /1500) 0.025(f/1500) f /1.5 1500MHz- 300GHz 4,000 0.025 1000 • • a All standards refer to root mean square (rms) measurements gathered by an approved method. b V /m a Volts squared per metgr squared. c A /m a Amperes squared per meter squared. d uw /cm — Hicrowatts per centimeter squared. e f — Frequency in megahertz (MHz). 411 • Sheet1 EXHIBIT 2 Distance ERP /uW per cm2 _ • 101 0.0261 20 0.031 - -- 30; 0.029. - - - - 40 0.027 50 60 0.023 _ 70 0.021 80 0.018 90 0.022 100 0.049 110 0.064 115 0.0697 120 0.066 130 0.059 140 0.054 150 0.049 200. 0.031 • • Page 1 • EXHIBIT 3 All Health Safety Report on Electromagnetic Fields from Personal Communications System (PCS) Base Station Antennas I am Thomas S. Ely. I have an M.D. degree from Georgetown University, and I hold a Master's degree in Radiation Biology and Occupational Medicine from the University of Rochester. I am a diplomate of the American Board of Preventive Medicine. I have been active in the field of the biological effects and safety of microwave and other electromagnetic fields for the last forty -five years. I have personally conducted full -time laboratory research on the biological effects of microwaves at the Naval Medical Research Institute in Bethesda, Maryland. I have been involved in numerous safety evaluations of electromagnetic fields including industrial heating applications, radio frequency • sputtering machines, extremely low frequency communications, microwave ovens, Nexrad Doppler weather radar, Terminal Doppler Weather Radar, telephone paging services; cellular telephone facilities, Personal Communications Systems, 'FM and TV broadcast stations, and microwave relay links. The biological effects of microwave fields such as those produced by PCS base station antennas are within my academic and professional experience. My curriculum vitae is attached. In considering the safety of this PCS installation, I have carefully reviewed the -following documents: IEEE C95.1 -1992 ( Revision- of_ANSI C95.1- 1982), IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect-to Human Exposure.. to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, to 300 GHz, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, New York, NY, April 27, 1992. This is a joint standard between IEEE and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 86 (1986), Bethesda, Maryland. Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 100 kHz to 300 GHz, International Non - Ionizing Radiation Committee of the International Radiation Protection Association, Health Thomas S. Ely, M.D., 1995 November 9 Page 2 • 411 Physics (54:1) pp. 115 -123, January, 1988. PCS base station antenna fields consist of nonionizing microwave radiation. Nonionizing radiation should be contrasted with ionizing radiation, a type of radiation with which we have all had experience. Just as matter comes in little pieces, meaning molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles, energy also comes in little bits called photons or quanta. When the energy of a photon is high enough to dislodge an electron from an atom, a process called ionization occurs. Ionizing radiation is potentially harmful to biological tissue. X - rays, cosmic rays, and gamma rays from radioactive materials are ionizing radiations. Some of the biological effects of ionizing radiation are cumulative, meaning that some of the effects of' .yesterday's :exposure can be increased by today's exposure. Ionizing radiations are commonly associated with atomic weapons, medical x -rays, and radioactive materials. The mere term radiation carries a negative connotation for many people, and may result . in anxiety. Even at low doses, some ionizing radiation effects may be cumulative and without threshold, meaning that a -110 little ionizing radiation can'cause.a little injury. • However, this contention is not true with microwaves, the fields produced by PCS base station antennas. Microwaves fall within the classification .of nonionizina radiation, and in the case of microwaves, research has clearly established that there is . a real and known threshold. Below that threshold there is no in -jury. It is important to note that the photon energies in the fields generated by PCS antennas are many times too weak to cause ionization. Hence the term nonionizing radiation.. I have prepared a chart which sets forth the range of ionizing and non - ionizing radiation according to frequency and wavelength. A copy of that chart and a key to it are attached. From the chart it can be seen that PCS photon energies are only of the order of 100,000th to 1,000,000th enough to cause ionization. These nonionizing fields do not produce long term cumulative health effects, as do ionizing radiations. In the United States, electric power is provided at a frequency of 60 hertz (60 Hz) -- 60 cycles per second. In recent years there have been studies published suggesting • • Thomas S. Ely, M.D., 1995 November 9 Page 3 110 that there are detrimental effects of exposure to 60 Hz fields. Other studies do not confirm these findings. The issue is far from conclusive at this time. It is very important to note the tremendous difference between 60 Hz electric power line fields and microwave frequencies. Furthermore, the effects of exposure to large electromagnetic fields which fall within the microwave energy portion of the chart are far better understood. Just as it is important to understand that microwave frequencies are a long way from being ionizing radiation, it is also very important to note that they are a long•way away from power line frequencies, in fact more than a million times. So, current concerns now prevalent in the news with respect to power lines, pole transformers, electric blankets, hair dryers and toasters, etc. have nothing to do by way of comparison with the electromagnetic fields associated with microwaves. Research that. has been conducted on the biological effects of microwaves for many years. When man -made microwaves appeared on the scene for the first time little was known about them with respect to what level of exposure would be required to cause an adverse biological effect. This was indeed the case when man -made microwaves were first produced at substantial ?.410: ower levels a half a century ry ago, around the time of World War II with the development of radar. As time went on, the use of radar increased dramatically and extended into such areas as weather radar civilian air traffic control. Then came microwave telephone and data links, microwave television, microwave ovens, cellular telephones, and telephone pagers. With this increasing use of microwaves it became vitally important to know about possible biological hazards to people. • Microwave fields have existed since the beginning of time. The sun emits microwaves. Warm bodies emit microwaves. In fact, an environment free of microwaves would be lethal. So the question about microwave safety is not a qualitative one but a quantitative one. As with any other physical agent, too much is hazardous, and a little bit is safe. The task at hand then is to develop a quantitative standard for microwave safety. The development of technical knowledge, and specifically knowledge with respect to biological hazards of microwave energy, found its beginnings some forty -odd years ago by the • convening of the best experts in the country. They were asked to analyze the data existing in the world at that time • • Thomas S. Ely, M.D., 1995 November 9 Page 4 • in order to develop information on the potentially adverse effects of microwave energy. They were also asked to continue to follow the issue, meet regularly, and revise the information as additional scientific data became available. This was the birth of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C -95 Committee which began this work in earnest in the 1950s. ANSI is a large voluntary consensus • organization. Consensus as used in this context means that the committee be balanced by having broad representation from academia, government, industry, labor, and the public. University professors form the largest segment as shown in the attached table. Members represent a broad scope of scientific backgrounds including biology, physiology, cell biology, genetics, medicine, radiology, pharmacology, • toxicology, physics, biophysics, engineering, bioengineering, law, medical history, safety, etc. I served on ANSI Committee C95 for twenty -one years from 1958 to 1979, a period 'which back to the very earliest of ANSI reports on this subject. By its charter, ANSI is required to follow the subject continuously, and every five years either reaffirm, revise, or abandon its standard. The latest ANSI report was published under the sponsorship of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) as Report ANSI /IEEE C95.1- . 1992. I continue to follow the activities of the committee. I have been a member of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ' (NCRP) since 1970. In 1986 the Council published'its report on the biological effects of electromagnetic field exposure as Report No. 86. These safety standards of ANSI /IEEE and NCRP are entirely compatible. They are designed for 24- hour - per -day, lifetime exposure from conception on. Thus they are designed to apply to all -- fetuses, young, old, sick, well. The world's scientific literature continues to be considered in the development of the safety standards. Currently there are over 10,000 such reports. There are over 100 experts working on the committees continuing to evaluate the biological effects of electromagnetic fields. Under the most conservative assumptions of any scientifically recognized standard, the electromagnetic fields associated with PCS base station antennas are many many times below the levels associated with adverse effect, and many many times below the safety standards that have been recommended by the experts in the various published standards. • • Thomas S. Ely, M.D., 1995 November 9 Page 5 • 111 The attached bar graph illustrates this point. The first bar indicates the magnitude of the field the safety standards consider to be at the threshold of harm. A safety factor of 10 is then applied to this level to generate the recommended safe level for occupational exposure use, illustrated by the second bar. It is conventional to apply an additional safety factor for exposure of the general public. Another factor of 5 produces the level illustrated by the third bar, 50 times below the threshold of harm. The fourth bar illustrates the maximum exposure from a PCS base station antenna.: .This bar is hard to see because it is many many times smaller..than bar three, the general public standard for safe exposure. In view of this, based on my research, knowledge, and experience in this discipline, I conclude that the PCS base station facility will not cause. adverse health effects to people in the area either now or in the future. Thomas S. Ely, M.D. . (PCS1195] • • III CURRICULUM VITAE Thomas S. Ely, M.D. Home Address: 8987 Taft Road, Bloomfield NY 14469 -9545 Home Telephone: (716) 624 -2711 Fax: (716) 624 -2711 Social Security Number: 129 -14 -0872 • Born: 1924 September 26 • Birthplace: Philadelphia PA • Education: Millburn High School, Millburn NJ 2/39 -f Bethany College, Bethany WV Premedical 9/42 - Georgetown University, Washington DC M.D. 9/44 - University of Rochester, Rochester NY M.S. (Radiation Biology and. Occupational Medicine) 9/61 -f { Professional Positions in chronological order: 7/48 -6/49 U.S. Navy, Naval Hospital, Intern Bethesda MD 7/49 -11/ U.S. Navy, Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda MD Project Officer (nuclear weapon flashburn research) 12/52 -8/54 U.S. Navy U.S.S. Kearsarge Asst. Med. Offi 9/54 -3/56 U.S. Navy, Naval Medical Project Officer Research Institute, Bethesda MD (biological effects of microwaves research) 4/56 -4/58 U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Assistant Chief Washington DC Medical Branch 5/58 -8/61 do. Chief, Health, Health Prot. Br 41 • • Curriculum Vitae -- Thomas S. Ely, M.D. Page 2 111 1962 -66 University of Rochester Asst. Professor School of Medicine and Dentistry Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Rochester NY 1966 - do. Clin. Asst. Pro 6/63 - 6/64 Eastman Kodak Company Resident in Occ Medical Department pational Medici Rochester NY 6/64 -7/66 do. Staff Physician 7/66 -1/69 Eastman Kodak Company Staff Physician Laboratory of Industrial Medicine 1969 -1972 Eastman Kodak Company Supervisor Environmental , Health Services, Laboratory of.Industrial Medicine 1972 -1984 Eastman Kodak Company Assistant Direc Health, Safety, and Human Factors Laboratory • 1984 -1986 Eastman Kodak Company . Director Occupational Health Laboratory, ' Health and' Environment Laboratories 1986- present Independent consultant in the field of radiation • safety. Consultations have involved cellular telephone, mobile radio, television, FM, dispatch, paging, Nexrad Doppler Radar, Terminal Doppler Wea* Radar; industrial RF heating, xenon flash, ultraviolet, . radioactive materials. • Professional /Civic Affiliations American Academy of Occupational Medicine, Member 1960, Fellow 1983 until merger with American Occupational Medical Association American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1950 - present American Board of Preventive Medicine - diplomate, certified in Occupational Medicine, 1964 - present • • 411 • Curriculum Vitae -- Thomas S. Ely, M.D. Page 3 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (formerly American College of Occupational Medicine, formerly American Occupational Medical Association, formerly Industrial Medical Association) Member 1957- present Fellow 1962 - present Board of Directors 1967 -1970 Second Vice President 1970 -1971 First Vice President 1971 -1972 President -Elect 1972 -1973 President 1973 -1974 Committee on Radiation, 1959 -71 - Chairman, 196371 Committee on Legislation, 1969 -70 Merit in Authorship Award Committee, 1969 -70 Committee on Ethical. Practice in Occupational Medicine, 197.5 -78 Health Achievement in Industry Award Committee, 1979 -80 (Chaim Judicial Committee, 1979 -83 • Meritorious Service: Award Committee, 1979 -80 Journal of'Occupational Medicine Abstracter in the.field of Radiation Health, 1959 -70 Abstract Editor,. 1963 -70 Member of Editorial Board, 1963 -75 f American•College of Preventive Medicine - Fellow, 1964 -1976, Vice President for Occupational Medicine 1971 -1972 American Industrial Hygiene Association, 1966 - present Non - ionizing Radiation Committee, 1969 -1974 Representative - American Academy of Occupational Med. 1970 -197 Workplace Environment Exposure Level Committee, 1981 -1984 American National Standards Institute C -95 Committee on RF Radiation Protection and Measurements 1958 -1979 Z -136 Committee on Safe Use of Lasers and Masers, 1972 -198.3 Z -311 Committee on Photobiological Safety of Lamps and Lighting Systems, 1977- present Bioelectromagnetics Society 1980 - present Food and Drug Administration Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committ 1975 -78 • Curriculum Vitae -- Thomas S. Ely, M.D. Page 4 Genesee Regional Health Planning Council, (safety of microwave ovens) 1971 -74 Hearing and Speech Center of Rochester, Inc. Board of Directors, 1973 -78 Health Physics Society, 1985- present National Board of Medical Examiners - diplomate, 1949 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Council Member, 1970 - present Board of Directors, 1975 -80 Nominating Committee, 1980 -83 • Risk Analysis Committee, 1980- present Budget and Finance Committee, 1983 -86 • • National Research Council /National Academy. of Sciences Commit on Indu Hygiene, ca. 1955 -58 Committee. on Biosphere Effects of Extremely Low Frequency • Radiation, 19.76 -77 • • • Chemical Hazards in the Laboratory Committee, ca. 1982 -83 • New York State Upstate Occupational Medical Association, 1963 - preset (11 Occupational Health Institute Board of Directors, 1969 -70 Permanent Commission and International Association on Occupational Health, 1965 -1988 • • Ramazzini Society, 1974- present Society for Risk Analysis, 1980- present . Western New York Section., American.Industrial Hygiene Association, 1966 - present Western New York Section, Health Physics Society, 1985- present 1995 January 11 • 41k • • REPORTS AND PUBLICATIONS Thomas S. Ely, M.D. Pearse, H. E., Blakney, R. M., Davis, T. P., Ely, T. S., Hogg, L., Kinglsey, H. D., Krolak, L. J., Morton, J. H., and Payne, J. T.: Operation Greenhouse Report Annex 2.2; Control Studies Performed in the United States and at Eniwetok, Part IX, "Thermal Burn Project ", August 1951. Pearse, H. E. Kingsley, H. D., Schilling, J. A., Ely, T. S., Hogg, L., Blakney, R. M., Davis, T. P., Krolak, L. J., Murden, Ch. H., and Williams, D. B.: Operation Greenhouse Scientific Directors's Report Annex 2.7, "Thermal'Burn Project ", October 1951. Draeger, R. H., Eicher, M., Ely, T. S., Harris, F. T., R. H., Shea, T. E., and Whitten, F. I.: Operation Snapper Project 4.2, "BiomedicalExposu're Equipment Report to the Test Director ", December 1952. Ely, T. S., and Draeger, R. H.: The Design and Development of Equipment for the Exposure of Animals to Thermal Radiation During Atomic Weapons Field Tests, Naval Medical Research Institute Report, Project NM 006 012.02.01, 16 July 1953. Ely, T. S., and Goldman, D. E.: Heat Exchange t Characteristics of Animals Exposed to 10 -cm Microwaves, IRE Transactions of the Professional Group on Medical Electronics, PGME-4:38, February 1956. Ely, T. S and Goldman, D. E.: Effects of Total Profile and Restricted Area Exposure to 10 -cm Microwaves, Federation Proceedings, Vol. 15, No. 181 pg. 57 March 1956. Ely, T. S., and Goldman,' D. E., and Hearon, J. Z.: Heating Characteristics of Laboratory Animals Exposed to Ten - Centimeter Microwaves, Naval Medical Research Institute Report, Project NM 001 056.13.02, 21 March 1957. Also published in Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation, John M. Osepchuk ed., IEEE Press, New York, 1983. An abridgment in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME -11:4, pp. 123 -137, October 1964. Ely, T. S.: Improved Mercury Vapor Detector, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Report, WASH -744, October 24, 1957. Davis, T. P.: Miller, N. D., Ely, T. S., Basso, J. A., and Pearse, H. E: The Scattering of Thermal Radiation into Open Underground Shelters, Civil Effects Test Operations Report CEX -58.2, October 1959. 410 •' Page 2 • • Ely, T. S.: Review of Some Recent Research on the Body • Effects of Microwaves, Digest of Technical Papers, 12th ■-- Annual Conference on Electrical Techniques in Medicine and. •r Biology, November 10 -12, 1959. Ely, T. S.: Radiation Hazards in Industry, The North Carolina Medical Journal, Vol. 21, No. 9, September 1960. Ely, T. S.: Diagnosis and Evaluation of Impairment from Ionizing Radiation, Legal and Administrative Problems of Protection in the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Proceedings of the European Atomic Energy Community Symposium held in Brussels, 5 -8 September 1960. Also in Atomic Energy .Law Journal, 3:12, Winter, 1961. Ely, T. S.: Organization of Medical Control Services -1.h %. • Nuclear Installations for which the AEC is Responsible, • Proceedings of the European Atomic Energy Community Symposium held in Stresa - Ispra, Italy, 2 -5 May 1961. • Ely, T. S.: . What are the Environmental Problems Today ?, The President's Conference on Occupational Safety, U. S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Standards, June 23 -25, 1964. Also in Industrial Medicine and Surgery, 33:629, September 1964. Ely, T. S., MacFarlane, J. W., Galen, W. P., and Hine, C. H.: Convulsions in Thiodan Workers, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 9:35, February 1967. Astill, B. D., Cantor, E. E.,, Ely, T. S., Jones, W. H. Uskavitch, B. A.: The Oral Ingestion of t Butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) by•Humans: Clinical Observations and Metabolic Fate, Laboratory of Industrial Medicine, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, ' NY, September-8, 1967. Ely, T. S.: X -Rays are Visible: The Radiation Phosphene, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 10:9, January 1968. Ely, T. S.: Spirometer Accuracy, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 10:247, May 1968. Ely, T. S.: Licensing of Radioactive Materials in Industry, Archives of Environmental Health, 21:200, August 1970. Ely, T. S.: A Study of the Mortality, Symptoms and Respiratory Function in Humans Occupationally Exposed to Oil Mist, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 12:253, July 1970. Reynolds, R. C., Travis, M. G., and Ely, T. S.: Physiological Fate of Sucrose- 14C(U) Acetate Isobutyrate in Humans, Report BCH -71 -2, Laboratory of Industrial Medicine, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY, March 26, 1971. • Page 3 • t ' ,. 'w ' A'7 • Ely, T. S.: A Microlite Detector, odification for Microwave • I.,.::. Oven Maintenance, American Indust/Xi Hygiene Association 1. _. �-- Journal, 32:276, April 1971. :'_ _ -. ), = 411 Ely, T. S.: Microwave Death, Journal of the American Medical Association (letter to the Editor); September 1971. • Reynolds, R. C., Travis, M. G., and'Ely, T. S.: Physiological Fate of Sucrose- 14C(U) Acetate Isokutyrate and Sucrose- 14C(U) in Humans, Report BCH 72 - 1, Labora of Industrial Medicine, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester NY, January 12, 1972. Ely, T. S.: Control of Occupational Exposures. t6 Nonionizing Radiation, Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Noni sizing Radiation (Proceedings of a conference by Departinent-vf Radiation Biology and Biophysics, School of Medioine Dentistry, University of Rochester, June 5- 7,'1974), Plenum Press, NY, 1975. :..::b >:' Ely, T. S.: Workplace Hazards and Young Humans, Journal' of Occupational Medicine, 18:55, 1976.',:l. . • Ely, T. S.: Developing Neighborhood Concentration Standards, Proceedings of the International Technical Conference on Toxic Air Contaminants, Health Effects Monitoring and Control, sponsored by Air Pollution Control Association, October 9 -10, 1980. , lil Ely, T. S.: Science and Standards,. Journal, pi Microwave Power, (letter to the editor) p. 137,.1985. Ham, W. T., Jr Mueller, H. A., and Ely, T. S.: Potential Ocular Hazards from Xenon Flashlamps, Applied Optics, 26:3466. August 1987. Hart, W. L., Reynolds, R. C., Krasavage, W. J., Ely, T. S., Bell, R. H., and Raleigh, R. L.: Evaluation of Developmental Toxicity Data: A Discussion of Some Pertinent Factors and a Proposal, Risk Analy 43:59, March 1988 ' 411 • • w • +• EXHIBIT 1c • SITE SERVICES Site: // i garaP AUTHORIZATION Site ID: Oyt 7C. FORM MTA: ep,rrfc ENTRY AND TESTING AGREEMENT „THIS AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into as of the O -,2 day of / , 1996, by and between 7 , - a� e D,a7 t P ( "Owner ") and Sprint Spectrum L.P., ( "SSLP "), concerning the oolowing described property owned by Owner ( "Property). A. SSLP has an interest in (leasing/purchasing) the Property for use as a tower or antenna site for the receipt and transmission of wireless communications signals; and B. In order for SSLP to determine the viability and feasibility of the Property as a tower or antenna site, it is necessary for employees, agents or independent contractors of SSLP to enter upon and inspect the Property and/or temporarily locate communications equipment on the Property to conduct short term radio propagation tests, and to make application with local, state and federal governmental entities for approval of the Property as tower or antenna site; and C. Owner and SSLP desire to provide for the entry upon, inspection and/or testing activities, and applications concerning the Property pursuant to the terms contained in this Agreement. • NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, undertakings and other consideration set forth in this Agreement, Owner and SSLP agree as follows: 1. Consent. Owner consents and agrees that SSLP, its employees, agents and independent contractors ("Authorized Parties") may enter upon the Property to conduct and perform some or all of the following activities ( "Permitted Activities"): surveys, geotechnical soil borings and analyses, phase I environmental audits, boundary surveys, radio propagation studies, and such other tests and inspections of the Property which SSLP may deem necessary or advisable. SSLP agrees to be responsible for any and all costs related to the Permitted Activities, including installation on and operation and removal of equipment on the Property. 2. Filings. Owner consents and agrees that the Authorized Parties may make and file applications on Owner's behalf to such local, state and federal governmental entities whose approval SSLP may consider necessary or advisable to have the Property approved as a tower or antenna site, including, but not limited to, governmental approvals for zoning variances, rezoning applications, building permits and wetland permits. Owner hereby agrees that an executed copy of this Agreement, Owner agrees to execute such other and further documents as may be required by the governmental entity in question to evidence Owner's consent to the action which is proposed to be taken. 3. Access. Owner agrees that the Authorized Parties may enter upon the Property to perform the Permitted Activities upon execution of this Agreement and may have access to the Property for up to 60 months. • d:\forms\author.doc 1/31/96 . , � • 4. Removal of Property. SSLP agrees that it will, upon the conclusion of the term of this Agreement, remove any equipment installed on the Property as a part of the Permitted Activities, repair any damage to the Property that might have been caused in connection with any of the Permitted Activities, and will return the Property to the condition it was in before SSLP's entry onto the Property. In the event any equipment installed on the Property by SSLP is not timely removed, Owner will have the right to remove such equipment and SSLP agrees to be responsible for the reasonable costs of such removal. 5. Indemnity. SSLP agrees to indemnify, save harmless, and defend Owner, its directors, officers, employees, and property management agent, if any, from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability and expense in connection with personal injury and/or damage to property arising from or out of any occurrence in, upon the Permitted Activities. Any defense conducted by SSLP of any such claims, actions, damages, liability and expense will conducted by attorneys' chosen by SSLP, and SSLP will be liable for the payment of any and all court costs, expenses of litigation, reasonable attorneys' fees and any judgment that may be entered therein. - 6. Insurance. At Owner's request, SSLP agrees to provide a certificate of insurance evidencing SSLP's insurance coverage. 7. Governing Law. The parties agree that the interpretation and construction of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of €)j ad without regard to such state's conflict of • laws provisions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. OWNER: By: B/ Name: Title: • 2 d :\forms\author.doc 1/31/96 • Al, EXHIBIT 1d • : • .., ., , ,: ... -....-- ...:.,.• .----- -- ..%::.,;•.-::. /...,•.;.-,•,-;;:-‘, --• ! ..,...'■''.',,... 4 4 :: . 4 . .l ., ■,• : ' '' : -..'7 ; ';' :■ .r: ! 1 7:' 'C 5 ' ::{: !...... .....1 .4 •' . :: ;6.... . .," 4 : ,;.' e k,;%;"..e>,; , ,, ,,, • .;,.... •••!''.*. • 7 .‘”'" • '4 t." , . .. . ". • .• ..• . ... :...t;• „' ...: ••:f ..,... :::-. v.. ' • . • . , 4 • '''‘'. r.'. . 1 .,-..c.'•vt..i:7^.:'• .- " • .• .-•• - -''''' - • - • • • • . . ,.. 87035140 • ,:...f. tk„..s..,...,, .., SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED — STATUTORY FORM C ti „V. , .. '' t,t , .:,. .,.. • (Individual or Corporation) • :. :-, - .;,,. ,4. t.:,.. .. • , . ,. . ,....,— . van s. CARP i • Y.; TIGARD WATER DISTRICT, a political subdivision Grantor. conveys and specially warrants to 1 :t.. .. • . '. of the State of Orson. . • • Grantee, the following described real property free of encumbrances created or suffered by the grantor except as ; • apeCifically set forth herein: . . . . , .. as fully described in EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and made rk part hereof 1.2 ;••/ ,..:- . . ..‹ .. .;',..■ '., . .. ..:, \ , ! This deed is given in fulfillment of that certain contract dated July 1, 1984. ,:.... . rat:on:led July 3 • 1984 fee II 84-25846 • Washington County, Oregon :. .... • • . . ,.:. Encumbrances: Subject to Powers of Unified Sewerage Agency. Rights of public in and to that . •.:-; portion of premises herein described lying within the limits of SW Burnham Street (County Rd. - • • • . . . . • • " P' •:, 1 The true consideration for this conveyance is $ .. ‘ 000.00 . (Here comply with the requirements ; • • - . • .r of ORS C3.030). , • - Datod this 2nd.. day of . J.uly , 19p4.; if a corporate grantor, it has caused I be signed by order of its board of directors. • . .- - name l .., , • . .. , . • • Van' S. Camp ..... , „ . • . ';ii . - STATE OF OREGON, ) STATE OF OREGON. County of ) es. ' County of Washington ) ss. .19 . • :1.9.•, July 2, .19 84 ) Personalty appeared and ..., . . 4 Personally appeared tp ebgye u who. being duly sworn, '- •.' each for himself and not one for the other, did say that the former Is the president president arid 'bat the latter Is the J . . . • , , , . . .6 . acloNowledged the foregoing In- secretary of the .. • at:mastiff cor • ...07.1k,-. voluntary act and deed. • was signed In behalf of said Co 4 soafitsints=ieonl It" ' • • e r4)4, 1 / 4 :, .... :: .... .. e. . % directors: and each of them acknowtedged said Instrument to be Its 6t, .., - o• ,,,,, . , -... , ' voluntiuy Sc? and deed. ..,.; ' ' . .:. ■/.' ••!. -;;e . 4 . 6 0111 . 1fr ? ' . Before me: •ri• • . • 10 0 - • - a . 1...• • • • • I ' '. , ..';4 . .: . 4 FrII' ' . .1? f . ' "‘ . :MY . - . T . . 45e'smiyist' .* _ Notary Public for Oregon .-..*: ...: :. • 4 v9 A ... e. ./6; . ....' ...... ;t '. At/ commission expires: ...., ..,f . ,:,• ' It the oonaidereuo.extnyieht of or Includes other property or value. add the following: :...., : "The aetua coital:As of br Includes other property or value given or promised which is part of tho whole consideration ..:- ..:‘,.:.(... '..'... • . v ... . . ...R '''.•T""., „.,, ,. ....-.. 410701 4RAIRTsz matTlerr . 45; ..., . . warp 11;68,414agrapligOPEtcy 'i': i 1 .. v a I. r .. rx isr. X WITH i•-••• APPROPRIATE CITY OR ci311$.4noWNINa . - — :,.,, ., ARTIlltarT0 VE11111 . A1 5 1 3 11ovED ; tit!. ..,., ":: • • • :: Grantee's MUM and Address • v • . Atterreoectling "Cum to: • ;';'7,:•A::•;•..',4"..2ZelallealiMR.-XII81169110) •. 1 VATERTISTHICT • • • .4. •-• •!,•;;.! • .. • .......... *awe se..cososartmat , ..... . ............. ;,,,,:. *:‘; ,,!1-)...A. , . . N ame . ...‘ ■ ',. Un111 Is requested an tax statements shall be unite the ..-..: . • . 10;1004110'eL:'...:.-4 . • . . . 44•14‘ ' • ?.f.A ' 4•44,4?-.4.4.74.:.;,,,......... . ... , . ,. . 5'.'•!; ' thi.4 7 r.is • 05ti::-....1 . :,. . . . • :ii cr ' , I - kr,.., • ' •_•.• .7 ..1... .. ,. 1 . r,t.... 4, l it , rigt - 4 . ,;:_f i t'41: ' '.!■''' ,. Name, ,Addreu rt: :3 , r.y1/44 7 54o) . '• • V ' .:. !' . I :,•.:, . .....0.4,1, ,...,.:,;....:.4.,..,,,,.4...rres- ....-',": ,-, . ; •.;,..,... • ,,:;r ..:,,, ,-;.:::- ,,': ;;:`.: .0 ;"t ..:',": o*,••:•.;.. ..' ,',..; .. . : 'oti, '..'• .,:::•.:.:."..,.., i i : ''' : • -; • .. ''..?..*:,,, ,..',., 1 .. .... 1. ' '..,,, , :,...,•; 4 4..43,•%•it,::' , ,x • , '' :c...• . , t ;','",,y, j ...;,:.. 1 :', ;,,,,:-, •''''., ,•..0. ,.....,;:,7, : . _ ,. ,.. .. *, 1, ::.,, -‘,;(...:.tr ■ • '',' .2.: (S. ., . r:" i'., '';r4 )1% 2. :'•''' ' . 7 .. .. ';'. '..'''^;", W.: — '' 7 ',, ' '', ' 1/4" ; i,,,', - .4, — ,' :A e,q s , :.,..;:; 'ell': ' .." : ,.....„,";';'.,,:,?:,4..;1.1.).`;;;.:.;,',*.,'.4-dloe.,;,,---,.....4 . • ;=..^...,, ;Ai :3i:, , ,,, , , f,r1; ;;.t . i r..v , . !4: ,: . ,.v.r,. .;::::,.,0:4-1,......„, : ._. , .-- N.; 1, p„•tY r.y to i , rt t r {: ;' w t + r, n t+. } l o� � {. ' tier. , a , d ' PPr� +' i t t u'r" 1 ` '+'.r, r, '' S _ t „ , fi � s tF r i 5 � r r , a -! t r ... � > < d � t . � iJ t , • ; gwo� w n r ° r > } ,. a f ). . t t��, 4 ' 7 ,. r. l3 `j: . . .. - w,. � •'°L -. t , / P � H .�. •L t t , t;5 r s , r , I 3L �. ..� � ,+, ` +, � •" Y ,. • � '�} t j� w r : } � r � � � t 7 •.„�; rtr7 ; l 4. � J , J t� ,'�.• iw::.T;N c �y„'J t � 9 tiS �( � ' . b . �t , n , f .i , 1. r a• + t �7�'' Fyi _ _ t :.. T �;t1 �, ,(G �1� 7 . } !1!i� +�! Z , t ; t'-' , #'.''''',Z..1,:".',',:' . ,•,..'•',, Zt t a , t t ”, • - •,''' r . ?, 1« ,1� )• '..;".7 . ,•r,_ ";} . rri -Ir.∎; e''..;'= t b ''r `d ? i,. i,$ • rr} •M ■ e t ., A.:,. ,.,.` •, i :: ^Y , . ,rr. fk•d. .. q€Y1'"i , •' -t•. ....- .. _ ...�r� ,�,v':1./0 .",.,^5 i� . . — - --- ��...._.._ — , y, ! +• „1 y • as i ;,; . 4'.r^” 14. : : a Order No. W 27815 • y DESCRIPTION ; J ' ;': ; , ' X h �1K : 1 PAIL= I ,. :,. e .1...1.,i- - •`' " " f tk v • treat' of land in Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of th : "" ', 4 ' . , F 'F r ),„.i . al r: "1 ' Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington . . ,� ��t ?' -' ;i: , ;.,2..., 1rs \'' ' and State of Oregon, described as follows: v . y 4 {; " "K,;, Beginning at a point of intersection of the Southwesterly right of :, . 'tt ,;• F:'P rly. /i , way line of that 50 foot strip of right of way conveyed to '^ • + • the Oregon Elactiic Railway Company by James R. O'Hrra and Mary C. t + :;" " .... k r:. =`�. : O'Hara, his wife, by deed dated January 4, 1907 and recorded February r+ ` .' ;' , :` O • nt 4 16, 1907, on Page 40 of Book 75, Dead Records of Washington County, '' i ,Q ;- ,. Oregon, and the vast line of the William Graham Donation Land Claim ;}'a ik `' "' ' No. 39, said point being monumanted by an iron pipe; thence South , ?.c i s`', ' 43' 00' West along the west Donation Land Claim line a distance of j� , i ' � "•" •t .. 7, per itl`•s 354.3 feet, more or mane, to the canter line of County Road No ' � • , • {4 . " 977; thanes South 45 04' Eaat along the center line of said County > � ' i}' •:t . " •' Road; a distance of 95.75 feet; thence South 0` 21' West a distance • :;;t , •�• .r. •. _ .• ,t , o 1 feet to a point, said point being monumeeted by an iron ''+� � , pipe; thence South 89' 41' East, a distanc-t of 368.55 feet to a r, , 4 , ; i ' point in the center line of County Road No. 227; thence North 0' t : ; .A 19' East along the center line of County Road No. 227 to a point on w e ;.+,, . , �' • the Southwesterly right of way line of the Oregon Electric Railway ! .A , !,,_ T ' , 4' f r ,, Company, as aforesaid; thence North 41' 58' West along the South- r ij'J ; '" westerly right of way line as aforesaid, a distance of 291.63 feet `> ' i ' 6 • . to the point of beginning. ; r ti r, 4, i +"r f ig n `. . , • PARCEL II 3�K ti +r ' k?t 41, '' A tract of d in Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the , V` i r; Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington ., , , f., i.. • ,.h F , ] h and State of Oregon, dascris>ed as follows: ck :re , -� • .4 i ' - a "' 8 . { ; '' Beginning at the point of intersection of the Southwesterly right ,X, ; *,t• '' t. a. i' of way line of that certain 50 foot strip of right of way conveyed r j , a t • to O Electric Railway Company by Janes R. O'Mara and Mary C. . f . :, .1 , .1 r` . y . O'Hara, his wife, by deed dated January 4, :'.907, and recorded 1-; February 16, 1907, on Page 40 of Book 75, Deed Records of Washington r`; "" s 'i ` C ounty, Oregon, and the west line of the William Graham Donation ,, 4 ;i =:'•, .• i: �, U , f , ." Land Claim Na. 39, said point being monumented by an iron pipe; .: a ' ••' �' r;; thence South 43 00' West along said vast donation land claim line ` ..i -A ' ,c : - County ' ` : ,7„ 4 4,i Y om. a distance of 354.3 feet, more or less, to the center of y t , ;,; ,; :- „,•;t,q - e •, Road No 997; thence North 45' 04' 30” West along the canter line 111;1.4,7'2s' � • ' r, rv• of County Road No 997; a dietance of 241,44 feet; thence North 43 ' i> ; . ,'' ' ',; f . fl' Rest a distance of 367.75 feet, more or less, to a int on the , '''''.4,4':',. l,"�.t '�r " "- .4' i • \F. -A. ^te - r• �r 3. t n; A � r l "... EXHIBIT A , r "} rh �Y = •!, Tj.,, ... •■ t •'rfp i : J y7 4 ) �..:.:4.,:t?,,,.. i l y t r .. t _ .r, u '•r- y - , u - • ta +•i; ; x•t �, t p i ? •r - � r �S n —y; ; c'. : trti -A, ip! -J k4 , .:•r N , t., .d y a S"3 ; [ ia: , „1.b•., • •,, . i , 4�N r 4 }, 'i' , ,.t'it,; A, + -•�'. �t�!� - t r►) : ! t '1.° i } '.S'T•... ,, �- - 4 r . , .. . • .P,',,''.. P i � , - , r i , t } , ^ . x , . k t - 'a `5 h „,..1. tYl� t r ti : r f` ! t• S �. ■ t , fu #,�,:;;, . r .• \ " {t,.,�. ' "f ei ;a''!c\'''a Y k r r +` , tl�s�y.t l: 1.3 �n°.'t' �?,' " 7. � �� : . t ' cr , y l ;, , x r � � { ^ ti ,4% .a i,. ., ;. F �' c' r • ' .ti .. l ,. � r..1;r4; •A': r f i } t" i 1 V.t r t t ” 4 )+, �- I 1 g r71 ,a ,�*a ,,( t; l7t a r ; 1 '}.1 K �t� G. ', '4 •....,. S♦ S — . . ' : , k' , '. . . r'' ' •• :'," ' t , r Y :ry + ". Q;h, }t,Y. � _ • ,+t. +' ; , ',t •C• -.4:-•'•••• , rr.,i r , Ct ∎- • i Y '',:, v .ii'~ ^':'fif. •`, `. r ' , a•, •rva.�.i,�s.;: - r^� ": ° � , �''' .:. 1lif;^F,( ,, -_. . .�--` r\. 1,, ' li ? , n ,: n i' ..) t F.J .. :: �:,'�: i. - - : �' h4 41 •I ` ,� :� : : . , v.; : % IL : .I r ' ri„,' '. � it i .. ,.�.i.J�•,.. ,, z:: rr a n J . , ' • + •t , • r ' t . 1 i 1. 9W v / ,: ' i! = c r;• ,r, ;4. ' ,, . it :,, i ' ,, • ''tlQ i-• t ai;.. }• � a. ! , • ..e' C �n:. • . . ... .., ,.... .....,,.�..n_,. - _— ... «-- •.._... ►d:.ra..- .....t. . �.i:.. t:. e P L C Vic; , - . �' ..� a J • Y. 1J; Order Ito. V 27815 °4 � , . DISCRIPTION - Continued Southwesterly right of way' line of that carteia,50 foot strip of s ,•', �•:'` " '? right of way 'the Oregon Electric.Bails y Company Co n b y '')'. 7 cones d o 7's F t ti Ru ,. dolph 8nnsiker and,S. C. Bhnsiker, his wife, by dead dated December r -,•., ' ; � ' . • 13, 1906 and recorded Yebruary 16, 1907, on Page 39 of Book 75 : 4 `` s + ' Deed Records of Washington County, Oregon, thence South 41' 38' ' ?"^ , r • . - East a distance of 242.25 feet, more or less, along said South- "= �' westerly right of way line to the point of ' oeginning. r -^- ? , i; -fi, P/RCEL III ±' A tract of land in Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the .''" P . 8 Willamette Viridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington - y ;;,, and State of Oregon, dascribed as follows: 'oi 1.; Beginning at a point in the center of County Road North 45' 46' • ' , '� , easterly corner of that certain tract �' ;1; '" •` West 241.44 feat of the most y , 1:•:.'!•`•••"•:•....% of land conveyed to Charles Burnham by deed recorded in Book W, fi i{, Page 162, Deed Records of Washington ':aunty, Oregon, said beginning ? = w ";• point being also the most westerly corner of that certain tract of ,<, land eonveyrd to W. J. Kerry by deed recorded in Book 146, Page -..',?,;I: � , 105, Deed Records; thence North 42' 19' East along the northwesterly ' a, line of said Kerry tract, 367.7 feet to the westerly right of way ins;•' of Oregon Electric Railway Company; thence Northwesterly along said ' "+" 4 right of way line 60 feet to a point; thence South 42' 19' West "fi','` • "' 374.23 feet, more or less, to center line of County Road and the , ` r `- easterly line of said Burnham tract; thence South 45' 46' East 60 lu <' feet, mere or less, to the place of beginning. .,.,,, • STATE OF OREGON • . .. r• County of Washington SS ,i :41, • - I Donald Wt Meson Dlrector of Aasessmant :% r ' ` , and Taxation - and Ex-Of fclo'. Recorder of Con- '•; c the for said county, do heveby'certIfy that y .} .r . • lnetnar(ant of • wrltkla Yeas'. yet eIved :::1:i.:‘• r: "• and recorded in book of records of said County. '•••l> • Donald V. Mason. Dlrictor of •:;n' Asoea mnt• ' and Taxallon. Ex- 'r ;: •; County unty Cerk '!a. EXHIBIT A 1907.1 —9 Pti 12� 07 ` • l7—s:, SA7 CO 'y-, % as >rt _ • ::.t;'; i ,._.,, :a.,.,... •n• . ; 5.. -:^4. i t .: J,`.: ; .:„e;S _ • I ri Jj 4, , , ' r a C , t:= :'1 �'? ` :R t r ' ':- r 2 + - , ' : :,I.•. ' .• ' E ,1 r 7 \ . .i < ., :1'. G 3,,, , + P r :; 1> j 4.;, i i :i J , 11. \ ~-1/ ' • ' +< y, • • • EXHIBIT 2 r coMNuki \ • United States of America fi � C Federal Communications Commission RADIO STATION AUTHORIZATION V Commercial Mobile Radio Services ' � o OMMiss�o � Personal Communications Service - Broadband WIRELESSCO, L.P. Call Sign: KNLF260 9221 Ward Parkway Market: M030 Kansas City, MO 64114 PORTLAND Channel Block: B File Number: 00057- CW -L -95 The licensee hereof is authorized, for the period indicated, to construct and operate radio transmitting facilities in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter described. This authorization is subject to the provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, subsequent Acts of Congress, international treaties and agreements to which the United States is a signatory, and all pertinent rules and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, contained in the Title 47 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Initial Grant Date June 23, 1995 • Five -year Build Out Date June 23, 2000 Expiration Date June 23, 2005 CONDITIONS Pursuant to Section 309(h) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, (47 U.S.C. § 309(h)), this license is subject to the following conditions: This license does not vest in the licensee any right to operate a station nor any right in the use of frequencies beyond the term thereof nor in any other manner than authorized herein. Neither this license nor the right granted thereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred in violation of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S.C. § 151, et seq.). This license is subject in terms to the right of use or control conferred by Section 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (47 U.S.C. § 606). Conditions continued on Page 2. WAD/FRS No waivers associated with this authorization. • Issue Date: June 23, 1995 FCC Form 463a Page 1 of 2 S uu ur t W_L -95 CONDITIONS: • This authorization is subject to the condition that, in the , th event that systems using the same frequencies as granted herein are authorized in an adjacent foreign territory (Canada/United States), future coordination of any base station transmitters within 72 km (45 miles) of the United States/Canada border shall be required to eliminate any harmful interference to operations in the adjacent foreign territory and to ensure continuance of equal access to the frequencies by both countries. This authorization is subject to the condition that the remaining balance of the winning bid amount will be paid in accordance with Part 1 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. Part 1. • • Issue Date: June 23, 1995 FCC Form 463a Page 2 of 2 • • EXHIBIT 3 • Sprint Telecommunications Venture- Portland MTA 7770 S.W. Mohawk Bldg. F Tualatin, OR 97062 ENGINEERING AFFIDAVIT State of Oregon ) County of Washington ) • The Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technology transmitters presently utilized by Sprint Telecommunication Venture for its Personal Communication Services (PCS) cell sites operate at very low power levels. The Effective Radiated Power (ERP) • transmitted from a planned and currently proposed CDMA PCS cell site does NOT exceed 56 watts in any given direction. James Zerbe depose and states that the above statement prepared by him is true of his own knowledge. • James Zerbe, Radio Frequency Engineering Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this o24 day of 1996 OFFICIAL SEAL r - BRENDA D. SLAVIN � NOTARY PUBLIC - OREGON COMMISSION NO. 031392 Notary Public MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 27, 1998 • SEAL r EXHIBIT 4 • • DB960H, D 970H SERIES OF DIRECTIONAL PCN /PC ANTENNAS -._ • DB980H 8 TO 16 dBd GAIN, 1710 -1990 MHz � .,; . I "', T > ecibel Products draws upon its leadership and experience in 800/900 MHz panel antennas i i p offer you the finest in PCN /PCS directional panels. Seven transmit and/or receive models • • e now available, with N- female or 7/16 connector, to fulfill your requirements for PCN, ?:,;:; • PCS and E -NETZ •''� • • • Aesthetically Pleasing DB960H is only 1.25" (32 mm) deep, DB970H and DB980H ` ' only 2" (51 mm) deep. All are 6.3" (160 mm) wide. Height varies from 12" to 63" (305 '•�'J to 1600 mm), depending upon gain. . 4; - • • Exclusive Design - The small size of the antennas is made possible by Decibel's • exclusive flat radiator and transformer design (patent applied for). • Easy to Mount - The N- Female connector is located at the bottom of the antenna, the 7/16 connector on a 12" (300 mm) jumper extending from the bottom, for easy .... • installation on walls, buildings and other surfaces. • Beamtilt - Mechanical downtilt is available via optional brackets. . • • Sturdy Construction - Radiators and reflector screens are made of passivated aluminum, . radomes of tough ABS gray plastic and mounting hardware of galvanized steel. • • • High Gains - Select from 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15.5 and 16 dBd gains. • • Power Rating - 250 watts maximum input. • . • • Trouble Free - Each antenna is tested for power rating compliance and the absence • -- . - ;:;: • of intermodulation generators- • Lightning Protection - All metal parts are grounded. _ Ordering Information 08960HG N- Female ( 7/16 Connector 1 Gain - d8d /dBi , 08962H65N -KM DB962H65G -KM 9/11.1 DB964H65N -KM DB964H65G -KM I 12/14.1 I CAN BE SHIPPED Continued • 08969H65N -KL or M • • 08969H65G -KL or M • • 16/18.1 ! BY UPS. OB972H90N -KM I DB972H90G -KM 8/10.1 I 08974H90N -KM i D8974H90G -KM 11/13.1 D8978H90N -KM i 08978H90E -KM 14/16.1 08980H90N -KL or M• " 0B980H90E -KL or M' • I 15.5/17 6 ' N = N connector. G = 7/16 DIN on cable extension. E = 7/16 DIN " -KL = 1710.1880 MHZ. -M = 1850 -1990 MHz __It Electrical Data 089621165 -KM 089641165 -KM DB969H65 -KM DB972H90 -KM D8974H90 -KM 089781190 -KM 089801190 -KM Frequency ranges - MHz 1710-1990 1710 -1990 1710 -1990 1710-1990 1710 -1990 1710 -1990 1710.1990 Gain - d81/dBi 9 /11.1 12,114.1 16/18.1 8/10.1 11/13 3 14/16.1 15 5/17 6 VSWR <1.5to1 <1.51o1 <1.5to1 <1.5101 <15tot <151o < 1.5to1 Beamwidth (horizontal) ±3° 65° 65° 65° 90° 90° 90° 90° Beamwidth (vertical) 10 5° to 1.5° 34° 14° 7° 30° 14 7° 5 5' Front -to -back ratio - d8 > 25 > 25 > 25 > 25 > 25 > 25 > 25 Polarization Vertical Vertical Vertical Vertical Vertical Vertical Vertical Maximum power input - watts 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 Termination N- Female or 7/16 N- Female or 7/16 N- Female or 7/16 N - Female or 7/16 N- Female or 7/16 N- Female or 7/16 N- Female or 7/16 Mechanical Data 089621165 -KM 089641165 -KM 089691165 -KM 08972H90 -KM 089741190-KM DB978H90 -KM 089801190 -KM Dimensions (height') - in. (mm) 12 (305) 24 (610) 51 5 (1308) 12 1305) 24 (6101 51 2 (1300) 63 (1600) Wind area - tt' (m ") 6 (.051 1 2 ( 1 0 ) 2 55 ( 211 6 1 05) 1 2 (12) 1 2 (12) 2 55 ( 211 Wind load (al 125 mph or 200 kph) -10;1 (N) 25 (111) 49 9 (222) 106 (4731 2511111 50 1222) 106 14731 131 (582) for - - -- ------- - d ray -- Gray Gray Gray - • -- - Gr ,, Gray - - -- ... Maximum wind speed - mph (kph) 140 (225) 140 (225) 140 (225) 140 (2251 1.10 (225) 140 (225) 140 (2251 Weight - IDs (kg) 1 75 (8) 3 5 (1 6) 7 1 (3 31 1 75 ( 8) 3 5 (1 6) i 1 (3 3) 8 5 (4 01 Shipping weight - Ibs (kg) 2 75 ( 1 25) 5 5 (2.5) 1 1 ( 5 ) 2 75 I 1 251 5 5 1 2 5 1 1 1 (5) 13 2 (61 'Deoin .s 125 132 mm, ,in0 .v.0in 'S 6 3'1160 mm, on all moiel5 - — - - - - - - -- - ALLEN TELECOM GROUP • DECIBEL PRODUCTS DIVISION • PHONE 1- 800 - 676 -5342 • (214) 631 0310 • FAX 1.800 279.4706 • (214) 631-4706 101 • • EXHIBIT 5a • NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING April 30, 1996 Re: SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. TIGARD PCS SITE Dear Interested Party: Sprint Spectrum L.P. is proposing to construct a communication facility on the property located at 8777 SW Burnham St., the City of Tigard Water District, Tax Lot 2100, Map 2S 102 AD. Sprint Spectrum is proposing to construct a Personal Communication Services (PCS) wireless communication facility consisting of a 100 ft monopole, antennas and equipment cabinets which requires a Conditional Use Application at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we are planning • an informational meeting to which you are cordially invited: Thursday, May 16, 1996 Tigard City Hall 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 6:00 - 7:00 p.m. Please notice that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. If you are unable to attend the meeting or have questions prior to May 16, 1996, please call me at 598 -1882. Sincerely, Heather Kesten • Program Manager • • EXHIBIT 5b AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING III STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss. • . City of Tigard ) I, Heather Kesten , being duly swom, depose and say that on April 30, 1996 , 19.......... I caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard. OR 9722.3 a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at Tualatin Post Office with postage prepaid thereon. • / / �. Sig , atu - (In the Ares ce of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) .- Subscribed and swom /affirmed before me on the G0-= day o , 19g6' • ■ OFFICIAL SEAL ' ��� - �v .. 0:F.7., . h�tr?, CHERYL CROFT BENNETT ./ v r NOTARY PUBLIC O. OREGON � i� . MY COMMISSION N ISSION EXPIRES NOV 21 6 , 1997 NOT . R /UBLI O F O: ' GON COMM COV 21 My •mmission r pires: i7a2/17 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) • r NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAME: TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Name of Applicant/Owner: � Address or General Location of Subject Property: [Subject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot #(s): h:Vog inlpatty\masterstaffmail.mst • • EXHIBIT 5c F W F INVESTMENT COMPANY COE MANUFACTURING CO THE PO Box 520 PO Box 520 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & Painesville, OH Painesville, OH 20665 SW Blanton St 0 44077 -0520 44077 -0520 Aloha, OR 97007 -1042 Greg Gettig Ann Schramm SMITH GERIG WESTERN PRO PO Box 920 6292 Preakness Way 25440 SW Newland Rd Lake Oswego, OR West Linn, OR Wilsonville, OR 97034 -0152 97068 -2248 97070 -9776 HOODY CORPORATION Charles Cordier PO Box 100 Beverly Cordier BURNHAM BUSINESS & STORR Beaverton, OR 2036 N Bryant St 9500 SW Barbur Blvd #30' 97075 -0100 Portland, OR 97217 -5606 Portland, OR 97219 -542' Harry & Thelma Gazeley W Harry OVERFLOW CORP John Zuber 12700 SW Hall Blvd 8950 SW Burnham St 9025 SW Burnham St Tigard, OR 97223 -8146 Tigard, OR 97223 -6103 Tigard, OR 97223 -6104 James Ochs TIGARD CITY OF H William Gazeley 11865 SW Lincoln Ave PO Box 23397 PO Box 230414 Tigard, OR 97223 -6317 Tigard, OR 97281 -3397 Tigard, OR 97281 -0414 • Richard Humphries GENERAL TELEPHONE CO OF Magno Thelma H Johnson Carl II THE NORTHWEST INC PO Box 230626 200 James St #407 PO Box 1003 Tigard, OR 97281 -0626 Edmonds, WA 98020 -3573 Everett, WA 98206 -1003 Mary Swintek 9915 SW Frewing , #23 Tigard, OR 97223 Craig Hopkins Pat Wyden 430 SW Varns St. 8122 SW Spruce St Tigard',.OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 -Mark-F. Mahon Joel Stevens 1310 SW 91st Court 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 • • • EXHIBIT 6a • MEETING NOTICE SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. IS PROPOSING A CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR A 100 FOOT STAINLESS STEEL MONOPOLE, ANTENNAS, AND EQUIPMENT CABINETS AT THIS LOCATION. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, the applicant is planning an informational meeting. You are invited to attend this meeting on: THURSDAY, MAY 16, 1996 6 :00 PM - 7:00 PM • TIGARD CITY HALL 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223.... Project Developer Contact: Heather Kesten Phone Number: 598 -1882 Please Note: This is an informational meeting on the preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. • • • EXHIBIT Bb AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE WITHIN ; SEVEN :('n CALENDAR DAYS.OF THE :SIGN: POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO:. . .:.... :..:.... tY::.... Ba :.::. . ::.:::....... .: ..: . :... ... . :::.: :: :;.: ;: :::; ;: R::: : ::A ;::::::;:>`' : ::: ::.:;: Plannin : Division:: :':':C ":.::..: > ; ::. ::.;;:::;. :::: >: :: ::.;<: . : ` > : : : ::..�;.:::: 13I2b SW`H: o: ; e ver ,: ; .;..:.:::. Tigard, OR :: 97223 • . • ... . • I Heather Kesten do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiating interest in a proposed s ° te fo s oalp equipment Serang t he land located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and /or tax lot(i) currently registered) 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard Tax Lot 2:00 and did on the 2nd day of May , 19 96 personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a Conditional Use. application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 8777 SW Burnham St. Tigard OR 97223 Inside main gate, to the 'left, on fence which encompasses equipment. (state location you posted notice on property) II . ..,a_zza'-/ ...,. , _ Signatu 0 In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the �4 day of , 1Z. . , •. I – — _ . �; O FFICIAL SEAL / /�'� �r i 1 CHERYL CROFT BENNETT � ,, NOTARY PUBLIC- OREGON �/I=:/ �=��I ® COMMISSION NO. A029566 N � PUB EGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOV 21, 1997 E ON My - o missi • • F • R N Expires: 7 7 7 (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project) 40 r , NAME OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED • ' TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: � Name of Applicant/Owner: I Address or General Location of Subject Property: L Subject Property Tax Map(s) and Lot #(s): h:Uoginlpatty masterslafipost.mst CITY OF TIGARD • CITY' OF TIGARD PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES NON - RESIDENTIAL DATE: STAFF: • l I L APPLICANT: L/E�tT0 0-10,1,cvltCv�w�rS1 SIC, AGENT: I c) Ok l_C)L_ Phone: I 1 P hone: / al Phone: ( 1 PROPERTY LOCATION: �7 • ADDRESS: I (LA...) le Lc c� t1,0 TAX MAP/TAX LOTS 2 (a2 ' 1 ° : lei 2 ( 0 NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): •c vcoe IYl©via / (/5 Ir- v yr r ► • PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: f .� u /o Gc �.e ! / L �a �- Co wr y u >z` COY 0a� 1 o h a /2 a ( "0� v— 6e pu i,•z¢K.d — s i b 4 4 0' . COMPREHENSIVE J / PLAN DESIGNATION: ��''� I f� / /� u � i- _<.S ; ZONING DESIGNATION: ���a ( /3 tt �w u.,„` CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT � FACILITATOR: �1��`��,:''•7..i �: TEAM AREA: • PHONE: (5031 ` • ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS te l 1p C+� y DLt� S4 4.- ✓€ Minimum lot size: looe_sq. ft. Average It width:no Maximum building height7/ Setbacks: front 0,4 ft. side 114 ft. rear 4r /a ft. corner 414 ft. from __street. Maximum site coverage: SS °% Minimum landl;caped or natural vegetation area: / % (Refer to Code Section 18. 4 4. C5() ) • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 8 NON.Resit:er.tial a : :ii;atior_P!annin; ce:at :men: Se::ioe • • ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL R UIREMENTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 et unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a pa ition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access a ement. The depth of all lots shall not exc d 2'-t times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1„ times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lo ) SPECIAL SETBACKS , > Streets: / '! feet from the centerline of Established areas: lz / feet from Lower intensity zones: 1 4/0 feet, long the site's boundary. > Flag lot: 10 foot side yard setback. At (Refer to Code Section and 18.96) • SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Buildina Height Exceptions - Building located in a non - residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: A maximum building floor ar„ to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; All actual building setbacks will a at least 1/2 (half) of the building's height; and > The structure will not abut a resid rltial zone district. (Refer to Code Section 18.98.020) • PARKING AND ACCESS Required parking for this type of use: Parking shown on preliminary pian(s): i 2' 5 w����l� Qy� Y71 4 tl / 5r -L./ './.: 1,, (�.S c.� ✓.Q tai LU �p 6 od. 10 Secondary use required parking: 7 / Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): cz d No more than 40 °0 f required spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be di sioned as follows: Standard parki space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. • Compact parking s ce dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.020) • Handicapped parking: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 8 • NON•Re:idential 2: ::attan:r !ammng Ot: rtmen: Sevin • • ' • • Bicycle racks are required for multi - family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: () .r Minimum access width: ///4 Minimum pavement width: tic, e o.�14 P lat All driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage parking areas, must be pave•. Drive -in use queuin areas: . (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) WALKWAY REQUIREMEN , Walkways shall exten• from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of al commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and eg -ss. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi - building commercial, • stitutionaf, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between . new development and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.05• LOADING AREA REQUIREMENTS Every commercial or industrial build' g in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and locc shall be as approved by the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.070 -090) (CLEAR VISION AREA ____. --- -- ,______,. The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at\ road /driveway, road/railroad, and roadiroad intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. , + 7 (Refer to Code Section 18.1 BUFFERING AND SCREENING .. In order to increase privacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and , must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or 1 i fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The j required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additional I information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. ------- (Refer to Code Chapter 18.104 CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 8 • NON Residential 3: :i::au:.iP:aan_ ; }e:arttnent Se::::n • • The required buffer widths which are applicable to your proposal area are as follows: ft. along north boundary. K 4 ft. along east boundary. 4; h ft. along south boundary. ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is requiredak:11g V •akVa) 1(E -P' l'r u 4p w1 , '1,�� ( 1 • LANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right -of -way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above crade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one (1) tree for every seven (7) parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) SIGNS Sign per •its must be obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permi handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards ma be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alte atively, a Sian Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings Officer. (Refer to Code Section 1 114 SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provides regulations for land which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100 -year floodpiain, natur- drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will an pt to preliminary identify sensitive lands areas at the pre - application conference based on available ins. mation. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensitive lands areas, and their bounderie• is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be - arty indicated on plans submitted with the development application. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 3 UM— Residential a::::cit:on: ?Iann:np :e:art-ent Se:ncn • • • Chapter 18.84 also provides regula,'ons for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is Dro • ibited within floodolains. In most cases, dedication of 100 - year floodplain areas to the City for pa and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval of a development application. • (Refer to Code Section 18.84) TREE REMOVAL PLAN EQUIREMENTS A tree pan for th- •lanting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, •arcel er combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, major p- tition, site development review, planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is prefer :d over removal where possible. The tree plan shall include the •flowing: Identification of the Iocati• , size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; Identification of a program to s ve existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must folio the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D. according to the following standards Retainage of Tess than 25 perce of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a mitigation program according to S:, tion 18.150.070.D. of no net Toss of trees; Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires 13.150.070.D; Retainage of from 50 to 75 percent or existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires that 50 percent of the trees to be emoved be mitigated according to Section 18.150.070.D; Retainage of 75 percent or greater of exist; g trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation; Identification of all trees which are proposed to be remo -d; and A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to protect trees during and after construction. Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a developme t application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be repaced according to Section 18.150.070.D. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.025) • . CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON.Revaennai a6 ; ?e:ar_Ten; Se:uan T 1 • E. 4 4-(y( • • • • • MITIGATION Replacement if a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines: > A replacement tree shall be a , substantially similar species considering site cha :cteristics. > If a re , lacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably availabl- the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent natural re• ource value. > If a replace • ent tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in accordance wi the following formula: > The number of r lacement trees required shall be determined by dividing the estimated caiiper size of t - tree removed or damaged, • by the caliper size of the largest reasonably available eplacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located on the subject prope , the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to be planted on other pro•-rty within the city, either public property or, with the consent of the owner, private pro• rty. > The planting of a replaceme , t tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to allow growth to maturity. In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D •f this section, a party may, with the consent of the Director, elect to compensate the City for its costs '� performing such tree replacement. (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D) . i NARRATIVE The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval , standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay re view of the proposal. � ! (P1i'ovt•dE .c? (1.1�, ,A 1,t,t / 6 // (.t1C�vt-taY7 G � � 'cwt ovt.e�'7 rf'ir 'ft( ;Ts- O p• -6(.5 e , 1 (Refer to Code Section 18.32) 1 /( -1 1,_1,1'c_ t-c )11 �sk 0. ,,. �i j c CODE SECTIONS 16.80 18.92 f 8.100 18.108 20 _ 18.150 1 8.84 _ 18.96 _ 1 q.102 _ 18.114 14 0 1. 130 _ 18.160 1 3.SS _ 18.9S L� S.106 — 18.116 18.134 _ 13.162 /,-- ;" NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING _ _----- ( The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout/ concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. -- c� ,± r y *I,../ ci ( ✓o✓ F i ,; � -a. `, I (S C -O t.t cs vt.-t , i.uc \ �r L 5' G';e, /ll t ; CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 8 NON•Residential a::u:aUOn■Plammng O artmen; Se:;ion • RECYCLING • • Applicant should contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625 -6177. (Refer to Code Section 18.116) ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: • �d k 5 t( aid Ls2:- Gt C e cas SuQ l /4i vi O L �(S� ✓�L a� 055 tkLic p Q /i.CGt ,a 2 � _ I . c c? L o Lt o �1 L� G� l (r c ! 2 c_ vo -he" " o1- vuc leS' 1✓tcr ct , „ 27 6E' l .'��� 3 C c io .4 ee ms fr- ,za-dtte. ) _ 4 6 / ` . .s- i"-s2 q PROCEDURE A inistrative Staff Review. 1. Public hearing before the Lard Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. • An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4 :30 on other days. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 8 NON•Re:idential a : :u;3; :on :P!ar.r.:n; :ecartrent Section Macs submitted with an atication shall be folded IN ADVANC• 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch • by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted, The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard 4 . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available f m the Planning Division upon request. This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre - application conference(s) is'are required if an application(s) is: are to be submitted more than six months following this pre- application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: (503) 639 -4171 FAX: (503) 6S4 -7297 :lc cir'pa::vtnas :ers•.preaec -c.ms: .Enc:neennc Sect:on: mast CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 8 of 8 NON•ResidentiaI aeoii t omPlanr ng Oeoarsen: Semen • CITY OF TIGARD • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EI T APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639 -4171. Staff: I L1 L3 Date: 3/2 -- l !APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ MARKED ITEMS -I) Application form (1 copy) - ,✓B) Owner's signatureAvritten authorization -.4$ C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed - 10 ✓D) Applicant's statement z0 No. of Copies 2 . 0 ,,E) Filing Fee SITE- SPECIFIC .\ AP(S)iPLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE / MARKED ITEMS A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 26 1. Vicinity map zo 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour Tines (2 ft at 0 -10% or 3 ft for grades > 1O %) ❑ 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds ❑ S. Locations of natural hazard areas including: 0 (a) Floodplain areas . ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑; (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils 0 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventor/ including: o (a) Wildlife habitats (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" - caliper measured 4 feet from ground level c 8. Location of existing structures and their uses - 9. Location and type of on and off -site noise sources o 10. Location -of existing utilities and easements - 1 1 . Location of existing dedicated right -of- `.vans PACE O "r - • B) Site Development er Indicating: 410No. of Copies 2 • 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties -- 2. Contour line intervals^ 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and 'easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements • on the site ❑ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas (c) Loading and services area m� (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ (f) Above ground utilities ❑ 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ❑ S. The location areas to be landscaped 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques 0 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 11. The location of all structures and their orientation ❑/ 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies " The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual • substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and 'now they will be mitigated A.r'.D USE A ?P C1TiC:N / UST ?'.CE 2 CF 3 • 0) Architectural Drawings Indicating: No. of Copies 2(-1 The site developm•plan proposal shall include: • • 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on -site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies <7,6 The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable t$ 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings m� 3. Location of terraces, decks. shelters, play areas, and common open spaces ❑ 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials S. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions 0--'"----- (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Si • n Dra inns: ❑ Sign drawl • gs shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code -s part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Pe mit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generati. Estimate: ❑ H) Preliminary Partitio Lot Line Ad'ustment Mao Indicatina: No. of Copies 1. The owner of the ubject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's autho 'zed agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20,.)0,100 or 200 feet =1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parcel ocation and boundaries ❑ 3. Location, width and n . es of streets. easements and other public ways within and adjace. t to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permanen buiiding,s on and within 23 feet of all property lines ❑ 7. Location and width of all \ ter courses ❑ 3. Location of any trees within 6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above ground level y ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% ❑ • 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements ❑ 11. For major land partition which creates a public street: (a) The proposed right -of -way loction and width ❑ (b) 1 scaled cross - section of the prdposed street plus any reserve strip c 1 2. Any applicable deed restrictions ,\ r 13. Evidence that land partition .viil not preclude efficient future land division where applicable \ _ !ANC __E > ?ci :G,';CN J _:ST . PACE 3 CF 3 I) Subdivision Preliminary •lat Ma. and Data Indicatin -: � No. of Copies 1. Scale equaling or 200 feet to the inch anTlimited to one phase per sheet ❑ 2. The proposed name •' the subdivision ❑ 3. Vicinity map showing .roperty's relationship to arterial and . collector streets ❑ 4. Names, addresses and t: lephone numbers of the owner, developer, engineer, surveyer and • -signer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of application ❑ 6. Boundary lines of tract to be subdivided ❑ 7. Names of adjacent subdiv sion or names of recorded owners of adjoining parcels of un -su divided land ❑ 8. Contour lines related to a ity- established benchmark at 2 -foot intervals for 0 -10% grades greater than 10% ❑ 9. The purpose, location, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the proposed subdivision): (a) Public and private right -of -ways and easements ❑ (b) Public and private sanitkry and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power telephone t' ansmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ` ❑ (f) Deed reservations for parks, open spaces, pathways and other land encumbrances \ ❑ 10. approximate plan and profiles or\proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe sizes indicated on the plans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed water distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fire hydrants ❑ 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision \ ❑ 13. Scaled cross sections of proposed street right-of-way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow or\all water courses & drainage -ways ❑ • 16. The proposed lot configurations, aopr ,dmate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be used for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon such lots. ❑ 17. The location of all trees with a diameter \6 inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the location of proposed tree plantings ❑ 18. The existing uses of the property, including the location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and \ a statement of which structures are to remain after platting \ 0 19. Supplemental information including: \ (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) \ ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership \ (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision improvements 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings \wetlands & mars areas 0 21. if any of the foregoing information cannot practieabiv he shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporates into a narrative and submitted with the application \ _,,D ??O_:C.kT CN . _,c- ° .'.0 "c 4 CF 5 • $ ) ) ) • • Vento Communications, Inc. 3/18/96 Mark Roberts, AICP Community Development Commission 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: CAS 047C Dear Mark: Enclosed is the site plan you indicated is needed to facilitate our pre - application meeting scheduled for Thursday, 3/21. We have designed the site with our installation taking just half the space indicated (orange highlighter) so it can accommodate another wireless carrier, as requested by Ed Wegner. Please also call my office before our meeting Thursday to: 1) Set the specific time of our meeting. 2) Tell me what we need to bring in the way of information, whether I should schedule our engineering or construction people to also attend. Thanks for your assistance. Sincerely, 22—P Tom Oxley Program Manager /file 7160 SW HAZELFERN ROAD • SUITE 100 • TIGARD, OR • 97224 TEL: (503) 598 -1880 FAx: (503) 598 -1889 s c ", i, .,,,/, • 0 k.S> 4 , °*-t #.‘ % , \ i44# w 4 # v1 D-0 .' • �: 2' 02AD -0120 4 , , , 02AD 0 1 0 '2AD -01:,' ' Q CO o 2s102AD -01900 ' • `'� O � 2AD-02 • :I 2S102AD -02000 • 0) S>, ■ u 2S101so slo.s 02AD -02200 25102 -00100 • 4 ti102DA 00 S102DA -00214 CZ 2S102DB -00100 I 2S102DA -00400 11 73 CZ 0) 2S102DA 00401 l i . ■ L� O ' u -` ..n� sow IIII maw Al mor, ....., ;;.:7.1 a I , xi - Vicinity Map CUP 96 -0004 Notification Map We. Map 4 not to oY N • • ';& L igyhlllJ. J CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER C=> BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0004 Case Name(s): SPRINT MONOPOLE Name of Owner: City of Tigard Name of Applicant: Sprint Spectrum. L.P. Address of Applicant: 7770 SW Mohawk. Bldg. F City: Tualatin State: Oregon Zip: 97062 Address of Property: 8770 SW Burnham Street City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S1 02AD. Tax Lot 2000 Request: > The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. Zone: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Action: > ❑ Approval as requested © Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance c3 Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision: - HE DE. SON SHALL,_BE FINAL ON , 1,996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M ON >1996': Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS • • A CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 18. 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 - 0004 >SPRINT MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 28. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS VEST FOR CO111ME C C q6 000‹,1, N N UST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS � ��� CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS {circle one} _CIT Area: (W) (S) (E) (C) ® Placed for review in Library CIT Book 1 • • CITY DEPARTMENTS • DEPT. /Davi F tt ti _POLICE DEPT. /Kelley Jennings. or„. A lomca !�6 nno P A o, TIONS /4ehrreele. , - .,1. sAw: _CITY ADMIN. /Gs ,4 v iectli, L DEPT. /Brian Roger. Develoornen1 R .,.Engine, L DEPT. /D.S.T. S ADV. PLNG. /Nadine Smith, Eannr„ s„omvnot TER DEPT. /Michael Miller. opefonGnl Mo.iorxtolbm 3.40E Bo. • SPECIAL DISTRICTS • _ FIRE MARSHALL _ UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell SWM Program /Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa. County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton. OR 97075 (pick -up box) Hillsboro. OR 97124 AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS WA. CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. _ METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION METRO - GREENSPACES 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. #16, Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's / ZOA's) Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232 -2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232 -2736 _ Brent Curtis (CPA's) _ STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _ Jim Tice (IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ METRO _Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Mary Weber _ Scott King (CPA's) Portland. OR 97225 -0412 600 NE Grand Avenue _ Torn Ham/ (Current Planning Apps) Portland. OR 97232 -2736 _ Lynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) _ OREGON DLCD (CPA's /ZOA's) 1175 Court Street, N.E. _ 000T /REGION 1 _ CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem. OR 97310-0590 Laurie Nicholson/Trans. Planning Larry Conrad. Senior Planner 123 N.W. Flanders PO Box 4755 _ CITY OF PORTLAND Portland. OR 97209 -4037 l 120 SW 5th _ CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland. OR 97204 _ ODOT /REGION 1, DISTRICT 2 -A Mike Matteucci, Neighborhood Coordinator Bob Schmidt /Engineering Coord. PO Box 4755 _ CITY OF DURHAM 2131 SW Scholls /PO Box 25412 Beaverton, OR 97076 Planning Director Portland. OR 97225 Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _ CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard, OR 97281 -3483 City Manager PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 _ 4 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 ' _ CITY OF KING CITY City Manager 15300 SW 116th King City, OR 97224 SPECIAL AGENCIES 1. L GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC " _ PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _ COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Elaine Self, Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard, OR 97281 -3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton. OR 97005 _ NW NATURAL GAS CO. Phone: (sw) rn - xu, _ METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS TRI - MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer Fax (503) 731.2.502 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox. Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland. OR 97209 -3991 1815 NW 169th Place S -6020 Portland, OR 97232 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 _ICI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _ SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Clifford C. Cabe. Const. Engineer 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 5424 SE McLoughlin Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Portland, OR 97202 STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES _ AERONAUTICS DIVISION (ODOT) _ DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _ US POSTAL SERVICE _ COMMERCE DEPT. -M.H. PARK FISH & WILDLIFE Randy Hammock. Growth Cord. _ PUC _ DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY _ U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS Portland, OR 97229 - 9998 =OTHER hAlogin\potly \maven \ttcnolic.mf t 0,too q4 • •))) • C 1 • RECEIVED PLANNING Venlo Communications, Inc. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MAX 1 51996 . • April 30, 1996 Re: SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. TIGARD PCS SITE A boa Dear Interested Party: - Sprint Spectrum L.P. is proposing to construct a communication f Ility on the property located at 8777 SW Burnham St., the City of Tigard Water District, Tax Lo , ap 2S 102 AD. Sprint Spectrum is proposing to construct a Personal Communication Services (PCS) wireless communication facility consisting of a 100 ft monopole, antennas and equipment cabinets which requires a Conditional Use Application at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, we are planning an informational meeting to which you are cordially invited: Thursday, May 16, 1996 Tigard City Hull • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 6:00 - 7:00 p.m. Please that this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application to the City. If you are unable to attend the meeting or have questions prior to May 16, 1996, please call me at 598 -1882. Sincerely, Hea her Ke•ten Pro • am : nager • • 7160 SW HAZELFERN ROAD • SUITE 100 • TIGARD, OR • 97224 TEL: (503) 598 -1880 FAX: (503) 598 -1889 • 1 ) ) ) ---- V E1 tei ti � n 7.) Vento communications. Inc "U� � - /• 1 ; '` '! 7160 SW HAZELFERN ROAD � --- 'IrE 100 • TIGARD, OR 97224 b 4 s % kw TIGARD CITY OF • • Tigard, OR 97281 -3397 • • . . _x7281 -3397 II. I„ 1,,, 1,, 1. 1„ 1. 1, 1.. 11... II,..II...I...11,11..I1,,.1"1.1 _. i 1 4,, • ;A-...ti.--)%:,.,.... k, City of Tigard. Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING • STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly swom/affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. El That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: 7 y {Mock box above. N applicable) (check appropriate box below) lic 11 Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director • ❑ ' Tigard Planning Commission q/ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) DECISION FOR: (O,adr box above. ■•pwk br•) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED 0) FINAL ORDER FOR: • ( chick b,..bwe, r app cabs) (check appropriate boot below} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF o FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION /NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A ", was m fled to e . -• - i person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attach ' (s), marked Exhibit "B" on • the ' - • a • �T, ! , 199 and deposited in t - • States Mail o • - r •a • , po ' 199 stage prepaid. P !'red Notice J ■ Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the day of kiP r , 19 ��� .,. OFFICIAL SEAL / 1 ., l e 4 / 'rr cf. a DIANE M JELDER /I. .b NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON J I _ �� .l ® e# COMMISSION NO. 046142 NOTARY PUBLIC I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 C A F ' REGON My Commission E • • es: i 7FILE 5 rR— I N y�nP-I— FO.: ? t NAME(S): , /'I/I /YIt l S ) • ft� CASE NO.(S): l��`T � 1(P`0004 TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: • • • EXHIBIT A CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, JULY 22. 1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0004 FILE TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum, L.P. OWNER: City of Tigard Don deBlanc, Property Manager Water Department • 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg. F 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tualatin, OR 97062 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST ➢ The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684 -2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF CUP 96-0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE REPORT PRESENTATION FROM TA CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE P A LIC HEARING: AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICEAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JULY 1, 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON' THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (25) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (250 PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. / Y PAif / ?� \ N , '%/ \ / \ /; - Th; '44.77711 ; CU 96.0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CUP 9lv i MoN)row LP �� i l '* I ) RR - 2S102AD -02200 BURNHAM BUSINESS & STORAGE LLC • 9500 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 300 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S102AD -01800 2S102AD -01200 CARL H JOHNSON FAMILY L P II DIBBAYAWAN, SUPHAP T BY JOHNSON, CARL H 8848 SW COMMERCIAL ST 200 JAMES ST #407 TIGARD,OR 97223 EDMONDS,WA 98020 2S10100 -00600 2S102DB -00100 GAZELEY, HARRY M & THELMA T GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. OF GAZELEY, HARRY W & PATRICIA J THE NORTHWEST, INC PO BOX 230414 P 0 BOX 1003 TIGARD,OR 97281 EVERETT,WA 98201 2S102AD -01600 2S102DA -00100 GETTIG, GREG HOODY CORPORATION PO BOX 920 PO BOX 100 LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97034 BEAVERTON,OR 97075 2S102AD -01203 2S102AD -01601 HUMPHRIES, RICHARD B AND OCHS, JAMES A THELMA MAGNO 11865 SW LINCOLN AVE PO BOX 230626 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S102AD -02400 2S102DA -00300 OVERFLOW CORP SCHRAMM, ANN M 8950 SW BURNHAM ST 6292 PREAKNESS WAY TIGARD,OR 97223 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S102AD -02000 2S102DA -00200 TIGARD WATER DI Gfi TIGARD, CITY OF PO BOX 13125 SW D,OR 97223 PO 23397 ARD,OR 97223 2S102DA -00400 2S102DA -00401 TIGARD, CITY OF TIGARD, CITY O 13125SWH 13125 SW L PO B 3397 PO 23397 ARDOR 97223 ARDOR 97223 2S102AD -01900 2S102AD -01700 . TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE ZUBER, JOHN H 20665 BLANTON ST 9025 SW BURNHAM ALOHA,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. DON DEBLANC, PROPERTY MANAGER 7770 SW MOHAWK, BLDG. F TUALATIN OR 97062 CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER JULY 1996 - 7:00 P.M. TOWN HALL TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223 anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign -in sheet(s). PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Hearings Officer meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639 -4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: . ➢ Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and ➢ Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of Tigard of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. (OVER FOR MEETING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 1 OF 2 7/22/96 PUBLIC HEARING h:\patty\masters\agendho.mst • • City of Tigard, Oregon CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER JULY 22, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 >SPRINT MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER< CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0004 The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 - foot monopole and related equipment structures. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. 2.2 >STEVEN'S MARINE STORAGE BUILDING< CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0005 The applicant is requesting approval to develop a 2,400 square foot storage building to use existing graveled areas of the site for outdoor storage. LOCATION: 12000 Block of SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AB, Tax Lot 5301). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The CBD zone district permits concentrated office, commercial, retail and related mixed uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2 7/22/96 PUBLIC HEARING h:\patty\masters \agendho.mst • • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: July 22. 1996 7:00 PM STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING'S OFFICER .: C :• FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CITY OF TIGARD SECTION I: . APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: SPRINT MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0004 PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a 100 -foot tall monopole and related equipment structures. APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum L.P. OWNER: City of Tigard 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg: F Water Department Tualatin, OR 97062 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Central Business District (CBD). ZONING DESIGNATION: Central Business District (CBD). LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S102AD, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. SECTION II: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hearing's Officer find that the proposed Conditional Use. Permit will not adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the City. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL. . STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 1 THIS APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR 18 MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. . SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site History: The site is presently developed for offices that are used for public administrative purposes and a maintenance yard facility. Vicinity Information: To the north, the site is adjoined by the railroad right -of -way. To the north of the railroad right -of -way, the property is developed with the existing Mango- Humphries industrial site. To the west, the property is joined by the Fire District Station. To the south, the site is adjoined by the remainder of the municipal maintenance yard facility. Site Information and Proposal Description: The applicant has proposed to relocate a portion of the existing storage bunker and develop a 100 -foot tall monopole for use as a cellular communications facility. SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Use Classification: The applicant is proposing to build a 100 -foot monopole. This use is classified in Section 18.42 (Use Classifications) as a Utility. Chapter 18.66 lists Utilities, as a Conditionally Permitted use in the Central Business Zoning District. Dimensional Requirements: Section 18.66 states that there is no minimum lot size requirement. Developments within the Central Business zone are required to provide a minimum of 15% landscaping. The applicant states that the existing site provides landscaping in excess of this requirement. Setback: Section 18.66.050 states that there is no front yard or side yard setback facing the street. No side and rear yard setback are required except; 30 feet shall be required where a non - residential use abuts a residential zoning district. This site does not abut an existing residential use or residential zoning district. Therefore, this standard is found to be inapplicable. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 2 • • • Street Trees: Section 18.100.030 states that all development projects fronting on a public street shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with section 18.100.035. The subject leasehold area does not directly adjoin a public street. Therefore, this standard is found to be inapplicable. The leasehold area is part of a site that already has been developed with street trees. Screening Special Provisions: Section 18.100.110(A) requires the screening of parking and loading areas. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. Planting materials to be installed should achieve a relative balance between low lying and vertical shrubbery and trees. Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect. The minimum dimension on the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Because this site does not require the provision of parking spaces, this standard is found to be inapplicable. The applicant states that the remainder of the site complies with the 15% minimum landscape requirement. Upon review, the original development application for this property was found to have provided in excess of 15% landscaping. Therefore, it is not recommended that the applicant landscape 15% leasehold area. Visual Clearance Areas: Section 18.102 requires that a clear vision area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to intersecting right -of -ways or the intersection of a public street and a private driveway. A visual clearance area is the triangular area formed by measuring a 30 foot distance along the street right -of -way and the driveway and then connecting these two 30 foot distance points with a straight line. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure, signs, or temporary or permanent obstruction exceeding three feet in height. The height is measured from the top of the curb, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Because the entrance to this facility is not located at the intersection of two streets or driveways, this criteria is found to be inapplicable. Minimum Off - Street Parking: Section 18.106 does not specify a minimum number of required parking spaces for a unstaffed utility use. Section 18.106.050.J requires that all areas to be developed for vehicle maneuvering shall be paved. The applicant is not required to, and has not provided parking spaces. The site access is proposed to connect to an existing paved portion of the site. Bicycle Parking: Section 18.106.020(0) requires one bicycle parking rack space for each 15 required vehicular parking spaces in any development. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas, or pedestrian ways. Because no parking is required to be provided to service this facility, this criterion is found to be- inapplicable as an approval standard. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 3 • • Access: Section 18.108 does not specify a minimum width for access to a facility that does not require off - street parking spaces. The applicant has proposed to provide a 50 -foot gate to the leasehold area. Because no minimum is required, this width is acceptable. Signs: Section 18.114.130(B)(1)(d) lists the type of allowable signs and sign area permitted in the Central Business Zoning District. The applicant has not proposed signage at this time. Should signage be requested at a future date, a sign permit shall be obtained. Site Development Review - Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(1) requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of the Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. The proposal's consistency with these chapters are reviewed below. Site Development Review - Additional Approval Standards: Section 18.120.180(A)(2) provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These other standards are addressed immediately below. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of 18.120.180.2 (Tree Removal), 18.120.180.3 (Exterior Elevations), 18.120.180.5 (Privacy and Noise), 18.120.180.6 (Private Outdoor Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.7 (Shared Outdoor Recreation Areas: Residential Use), 18.120.180.8 (Sensitive Lands), 18.120.180.9 (Demarcation of Spaces), and are therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Buffering. Screening and Compatibility Between Adjoining Uses: Section 18.120.108.4(A) states that buffering shall be provided between different types of land uses. This section is found to be inapplicable because this use is not a residential type of use, nor does the property adjoin other existing residential uses. Section 18.120.108.4(B) states that on -site screening from view of adjoining properties of such things as service and storage areas, parking lots, and mechanical devices on roof tops shall be provided. The proposed ground mounted mechanical equipment to be developed in conjunction with the monopole are proposed to be screened with wood slats within the proposed chain Zink fence. • Crime Prevention and Safety: Section 18.120.108.10 requires that exterior lighting levels be selected and the angles shall be oriented towards areas vulnerable to crime and shall be placed in areas having heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Because of the limited nature of the facilities that are proposed to be developed in conjunction with this use, the Police Department has not recommended that security lighting be provided on this site. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 4 • • Conditional Use: Section 18.130.040 contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1. The site size and dimensions provide adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; 2. The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3. All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4. The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5. The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 (Approval Standards) Site Development Review, if applicable, are met. • 6. The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use as proposed complies with all site development standards set forth for the Central Business Zoning District. The property is physically separated from existing residential development due to its location. Slatted wood fencing , existing trees, and other structures will partially screen the proposed monopole and fully screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The applicant has not requested that public facilities be made available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal, as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The Iocational criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a Minor Collector Street. The site is proposed to be provided with an access easement to a commercial driveway that provides direct access to SW Burnham Street which is designated as a Minor Collector Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light, or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements that are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna through the planting of shrubs. The antenna itself is described in the applicant's submittal as being a metal pole with antennas which are not expected to draw attention to the structure. STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 5 • • No other unique, natural features have been noted on this site. The property is level and requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use; that leaves remaining underdeveloped portions of the property for future redevelopment. The specific development criteria of the Comprehensive Plan that addresses the development of this type of utility facility are contained within the adopted Community Development Code. The applicable development standards are addressed within this report. SECTION V:. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has also not proposed to extend other utility services to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities. The Operations Department reviewed this proposal and has offered the following comment: The proposed easement is for access only. No buried utilities are to be constructed. No other comments or objections have been received. SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS No comments or objections have been provided. July 10. 1996 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE Associate Planner fi ` July 10. 1996 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewers o DATE Planning Manager I: \CURPLN \PATTY\CUPC -RPT. DOT STAFF REPORT CUP 96 -0004 - Sprint Monopole PAGE 6 • • • h 0_3 0•s 0 (4) PROPOSED PANEL `- ANTENNAS PER FACE. ;' TOTAL Of TWELVE . ___ • I I il W 10 y Z 1 Z Z Q STEEL MONOPOLE J a / ..\, 0 cc sJ _ i "il � ; Q .• O4 I COAX SM IQ{D FROM 1 % • TO LI MONOP .E \ I 1 • UTILITY PEDESTAL - PCS COUIPMENT 1 PCS EQUIP. SLAB 1 6' -0 MGM CWVN UNr. FENCE ATTACHED GUST ClN UNK \\ \1 \ i / oa C pat FOIJNOMTIO t � _.'. _ J / 1 v ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP CUP96 -0004 . SPRINT MONOPOLE `o. SITE PLAN '1 EXHIBIT MAP 7 CASE NO. CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE - ,,,, ,49. . ... 44. , . k ' --, •04. 44, 4A . t 4 s* .# 1 ‘1 A lit 1 P •■ : * , reg . 4 .. • ",„ Ns-t,..- 1 -*7 c . ,,...,">•%4SI4‘ # • 1 0 0 _.., -, .r,..-4, 4"....N-s li * .rt, lo * - ' 0 ,,. ,- gm "% 1 I P ' c .' 4& ,, IIII c ■i■ qk■ ca - (1. 4 .., .0' .. 4447 4 fr N■ V - 4x4e0e■ ' 712(13 S • 1 ■44 CY) */ 404 Ve* itw - • if F ...•-,..0.. 4 -to g Li- .a 40**41a ft SI hill 1 0 4V t qp.. AI. esAllion ,"• aull� 171 zp/ � � MEM 0 NINI $ Vicinity Q cur96-oo04 -_ Sprint Monopole • • A,., CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, JULY 22. 1996 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0004 FILE TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum, L.P. OWNER: City of Tigard Don deBlanc, Property Manager Water Department • 7770 SW Mohawk, Bldg. F 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tualatin, OR 97062 Tigard, OR 97223 REQUEST > The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684 -2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE REPORT PRESENTATION FROIVISHE CITY PLANNER; OPEN TH EdliU BLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TEgriMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICMAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER JULY 1. 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (25) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (25) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. • I • if 'c-\ sue_ ELL - 77 III II CUP 96.0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE • V O WCIVED PLAN INITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS Jut.. O 1 996 DATE: June 18. 1996 TO: Brian Rager. Development Review Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 - 0004 >SPRINT MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 28. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: 4 ., We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (P&ase provide the forlinving information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: R � ----�/ • 7.1-9(0 I Phone Number(s): ie) CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS r f . RECEIVED PLANNING A, JUN 2 7 1996 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 18. 1996 TO: Brian Moore. PGE FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 - 0004 >SPRINT MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 28. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ►r (Pl ease provide the folfowinginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: 1U100 Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS LIVED PLANNING JUN 2 4 1996 1111 • J CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 18. 199 TO: Operations Maintenance Supervisor FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0004 >SPRINT MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 28. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ , Please refer to the enclosed letter. ✓ Written comments provided below: /1-ef -CSS )548EJtir,44i 8,2i tl i N (3- Cr y . ,Jo & (42.-f A (.c i7 L l i (Please provide thefol[owing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • Vv` RECEIVED PLANNING ,mr t� yi l l ,� A JWN 2 4199& CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: June 18, 1996 TO: Bill Monahan. City Administration FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 - 0004 ➢SPRINT MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 28. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEA E CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ✓ Written comments provided below: / A e CH C4," N.�d �A`P w .AJf�rr'f /fel Aogeti , e e cu��e R leSSe 1 gve»ie .r -1 writ, SpaI.14 iv .a.1/ 4. kJ• of t1,. eleoprNiy , 7 I ptuw - 1(uh Cow•'hes c.�if ►�►Y PxiteC /Wm.( •aJ < Oh Ake reY ✓ow/10/' I J r-d ke 'to .w 4244 et iAi -7 /emit' Pie 5 a Iiw liar. re, i a c0 f (Please provide the fa information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • ,/ ,„„iy C ITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING DATE: June 18. 1996 JUN 2 0 1996 TO: Development Services Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 - 0004 >SPRINT MONOPOLE Q The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 28. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the farming information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: 9,1a 1 Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS • ii\fee\/ RECEIVED PLANNING :Tilt . A. CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JUN 2 0 1996 DATE: June 18. 1996 TO: David Scott. Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 - 0004 >SPRINT MONOPOLE < The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 28. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: I We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Tkase prvvide the fa - awing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): a? v I CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • 1„ANce,‘_/ mveovoill, RECEIVED PIANNINF ITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JUN 201996 DATE: June 18. 1996 TO: Michael Miller. Operations Water Dept. Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 - 0004 >SPRINT MONOPOLE 4 The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a 100 -foot monopole and related equipment. LOCATION: 8777 SW Burnham Street (WCTM 2S1 02AD, Tax Lot 2000). ZONE: Central Business District (CBD). The purpose of the CBD zoning district is to provide a concentrated mix of commercial, retail and residential uses. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.66, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130, and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Friday - June 28. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. • Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: l Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0004 SPRINT MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS , , : : 1 .7: . • . 1:1 . . :•• ' A....7i . •• • ,., . , .. .... .. ' • . . • ..".: :.. . : . . • .. ........‘ • • . . . . • i C • ; • . • : . . . . • : :. ';'... : ;; . • . • . : . • • , ... . , ... , , .,..e,..... .. „. . : . . .: ... .. • ... . •• , . : .. ,• . ,.• , . ' . ... : .4.. . ,•:,,....... i ' ...! ..1 ' .. ' ...." ...• .. . ... • ..: .: ..4......., . v • 4 . , ' .• ' .. '. ... N • ..• '••,•'• • .... ..' •. : . • : . . • •• . . .4 .e••4 r .. .. ... •4' .. .7. . : • ' . .. , • • • i 4 . : ••• ;{ • : ..... * .‘...'• ....• •••• k .... • . . • it . • .. . ••• ::: • • ... .. . :. •• . .. :„.. . „. • • :. , , : . .. . . . .... , . • •*: . . • .. • . .. • ..:, %. . . . : . • . . „ . . ' . . •• . . . .t ,.. . : . : .... :.:.. . : ,.. . :. .. •• . .: .... ::: • ...„,'' ....... , . .. . .. „ ... . ,. .. . • :. . ... • • : ..: . „,•1 N i , : „,... ..4.: . .. , ?.! x ,.g .. . • . , . . . • . e • ' .. • . ., .t,1 ..; . .. ... , . . • i > ¢ . i..: • . . • ,,,, ..... •• , 7 • x . .. X... i .• . A • Al 1A • x ' • • A I • :. .. : . . • XA 5 . . .... x . .. , . . . 4 , • x : . ' ••••I A .1.‘, 3 .,,A 7 A'•••V — • : A 7 I , . 4. .e. . : x . . ,;:g • i •:.• 4 ...., ' : . . . .. ,.• • . X, A . X I i I • . . •• • . .1 . • : . • . . : — .. .. x ..., • x ;XXX.. .: , ..., . .... xi : . I . . . . : .." .. X' . • . . • : .}' :.= . .. . . . .. .. • r: :4 I. . . .. • . : . . .....` 4 • xd ::. ' '.I ... . : , ...., :.... I.' :ft' ,.: • '•.' ...i . . ......• • . '4. 4 . 'i . •.,4e; . .. . , ... • . . . .: .4 .. • • . .. . • . U . • . . . • • 11,7A, . A ..71 • • .. . x . . . . : ,:•.. . . x . • • . . 1.. : . .. ... • .... .. . . •• .. ••• . , .. ... . . . . . • • • . . A '. • • • •• • . . . : . . . . . . : . . . : • . : . • x : •• .i • : . : . .. .. . .. A 1, i : : : : i .•::::: ... 1 A : • • • ••• •I • : : : I . • .. ..A. •X •• . A . ,... , . • , x x . . , • . : : ...., . : : 0 0 0 . . I.: . . . . . . 41 ... , . tle. i . . ..4 ::.: ..2.. ':"............::`: '........... :. :. 4 4 1 ::,.. 7..,i 11, . . ' • ..• . . . . I - ... .... ' . :1`. . . . „ .... .... ...... . . . f . ' . . . - . . ' - . .. . : . . .,, ....' . . - . . . .. . .. . . . , . . . . .4 . . - ... . .. . .." . . . . . . .. ., . . . ' . . . 1 .,. .: . .. ..... . ' ..: : . . ' . . .. ... v: . .. .: . . . . 1...:. ., , .. . . . . . . . . . - .. . :::.. . . :,..:.... : ::„.. .:.:... .... . . . ....... ... . ' . . . . - . . . . ' . ... . . . . . - . - . . . ' . . .. . . - . . . , . . . ' . ..: ,.... . .....,_,............. . . : . . ..... . ., . .. . ' ' .......:: . .. . ....4,' .. . . P . ' . . P..' . . . . . .. ... . '.....,...k. . . ...7 . ' .. . ... . . . . . . ' . . .., . .. 1 . ..., . - . . . . . . ... . . '4 \ ......, . . :. .. . ., . . , . ' :.. . . . — . . . . . . . . - ... . . . . . .. . ..4..*,, . . . . . .. ' ' ......`, . . .:. - . . - . ..' . . . . . . . . ... . ' . . ' . . . . . . ... . . ., . . :..:4... , . ...k . . ' . 0 . . . ...: :.;.,,, :... ..... ' . ... i . ... ,--------................. ......—............... ......................,„,...„........ . . .. i ...: i . 1 . 0 . 0 • 0 .• : : : ••••., a:::: ,......4 : ••• • II': c•••,..,. •• ',... ... , : i : : .. .. :;•;•,,; 7 ::: .. *. ..c...a ; : ....: • .3 :•:.... i''' (\i• 1. I • ...., i .•:. 4.. . ...• I 3 .. .. ":. ••, •••::: ; .., .• .• ... .• .• .......: . . I •••• i •'4 3.. ..1. .."38 8 i "4: " .. • .• — a 4 • • • .. . • • • : i • .... . . . • . • : a " i • a . . • --- .. .• ......' ... . x . .. . . , : .. ....... . . .. . : .:: .. x • • ..• .• . . . . • .• .. . r I .• .44 ...• 4 1 ' . .. 4% x 4. • '4' • , 4 .. 4, 1}„. . • I .. .. • • • .. 4 1 . 44 ... . . .• . x : ,. . • 4. . • . : x ;.... 14 • 4.. ,..„. .. .. .. . ' .. ..i .• .i „. ,., . ' 1 ..4-4 ; is • ••': ''''' •.* 't* t.41:' '''''•r° ' * . '• • . • 3 •••• '.; • •, . ,... I : •„, • 4 .i ., . . r }.• . ...: <.. x, '1 . 1 .4. ,:. ,.;; 1.. ..: I'll I.... 8 f...: 4. I • a4. • 4 a . . a . I • . , 4 Ao .. • " .., 4. 4 :.... ;• • • •': . : .• • xx •} 1., •?' A 4 4 3. • ... 4 . . ..r ....' .5 . 4' •.' , ' ' • ',:. :. . . . . F 4 . r • • '• Z .• .C . . r . .. ... , • r :IN x . .• • . . . . • .. . . • 1 . • 4, • . . • .•• .•• ';•' • ... x . 14 . x :. .. 4 f . ; . ' ' ..":".• . , ; . • . • ,••'• • .. .. 4 ••.• . .. ,. •• • ... . • ... .. • . .; .• . . . . . ,..... • •• • • •• • • 4 ' . 7 .•,•;...!•—•4•ff ,•••• - *; •• ••• , • • . . . . . . • . .1 . . . . . V • • .. . •4•• .. \ .. r-- 4..t .. :., • .. . . „ • .. • a • .... . .. . . \•• • *4 1:°; * •. re) 4, ..... : , .. • ...... .,.. • N , .. . • .. ... . ... e . .. .• i. . .• • .. •• - i, . .. . . . .• . . .... • .:' ; . •. . • •• • . ..• . . • \ •• , ... . . . ... 44 ••• . . . • . , .• • ...1. . . • ' \ . . . . ; . • •.• • .. ..... . . . . . . . .. • : . . ., .• ... ••• ... ••• . 4,.. ' • . , 1 . • . . . . .. .. „ ... . .. , • .. • • • • . ... ... .• .. .. .. •••. • . . ... . . . .4 .. • 4 ..• . E. •• , . .. . ..• • ... .. .. . . .. • .... .4 •• •••• . ••• • • . • 4 . ... X , .. . r.. '• • • . . . . . 4 • . . • . . L • . , • X ..... •• . • X . X x . L • . • . X X . •• 41 •• . . . x .• • , . .. . . 3: e• •.. • • . . ••.. . • .: •• : ..: .... . ... .1' — : . • . . .• . . •. • .....: : .. . . '.. x ' ... . •• — .4. ••.•• . • . . . , • ... . . • . • • •44.• — , . .• • : .• . . '...1 144••••: • . .• : . , . , • . . — — . • • ..• • •'',... x , N1: 14 ' . •• . ... , . . • ... . .. ' 4 .., 4 k '.' • ' .. '••• •4. ' . . . . . . x ..• • A • . . , i .4, ••X•• • . ..• ' 4 .. X. • , N :. •• ' ' .• ..s: • 44 • ; : > ' : ' • .. .• . ..t• .• . •1/2 . . . .,. .. • .>x . . .. . . ., ,.• . , .• . .... . ' .. . ., .. ' • .••••• , ' •••' ... l' k•k „. . ... . , ..• .k ....•• . . , • . • ' • ...' \ ,:' : •.' ; • .. ., x< a . • .4. N ` . 3 • . ..../ , • .• . .• • ••• ,.. .. .. ... , g . : . ➢ , . .„. • ' : •..„ •• • , # a . . .• *". . ... .. .• • ...... •.' , • 4 ., '.• 4 ... ,. •••• .,,,,.. q., . ,... • 1 • 1.4. .. .. •••„.. •.. . • .• ' ; • .. . 'i**F. ••• '4 • •:,.: , •::::::irq N ..1 • .' .1 1..i< . ......N ''.*V •* I 1 .. . 0 .. • 0.. 0 * * 0 . . , ., .... , , ,.. x ri:: Ili • : i ..... ... ..< : . ...: t ... 4 b ... • . .... . • .. .. a . � . ... • 0 . •• • fi • .. x'' • @ . i . . . H • <; • . w .....1 ♦ 2 .. b ..... .. ... y . j , . ... .. • ..: < .. ... ...w • ♦ " .. • • . \ r . . • : . ........ ............... • .........:xxxxx «xr.i sxr. xrrrr............. ......rx...ri..........xrxr <... .. •••. . • .. .. �.. E r.; :•..:. • TIGARD DOWN__1 N ELEC T RIC _ RA/LR ,a °,�,t: '!y 1502' . .. - �. . .. -- ---- •� -- -- Mawr y % ' ` `�� S40 535.98 y ` ,0732 "E _ ..._.. ti ;:4 . - 4 20' •— ..._... _ it -_-"�� IFT-11--ii----Fi 0. ? � y } AT &T i, ?., u �" :''�(, -_ . �_, WIRELESS (ELL SIT ' '- =^ �l' i 11 � ASPHALT NORM 1R , ; -- " �L : i :: " I • .' y..F'r..,. ,..% ..„ , +4' 'f' r I K�rrlt ^l . f _ --- u�` L...,.. >: ; — � �'?� 4 , 253.21 ' o% %f 1 `'=,..,,, .`' t „ EXISTING US WEST AND SPRINT PCS CELL SITE 11 s ; 4; , ASPHALT 4 ' r.'ti^ 10 • ` r - - ASPHALT PARKING LOT N ' sr. 5 %;t , ¢ SITE . a x 1 WARD 1 j J j TUALATIN VALLEY F IRE DEPARTMEN x - 3 ATE — x SleOVIALD ST. 4J a t I NORTH ` .;,;,, N I I 1 --- VICINTY MAP CID NO SCALE LOCATOR MAP , ° Mt Y CONTACTS SCALE: 1" = 40' 0 01 AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: LYN CARTER (503) 522 -7765 al a) AT &T WIRELESS SERVICES PROJECT MANAGER: JAMES KRAMER (503) 408 -1125 SHEET INDEX ., o EQUIPMENT ENGINEER: MICK LEINWEBER (503) 306 -7592 00 ARCHITECT: MNB ARCHITECTS: PAUL MEYER (503) 232 -2117 A1. COVER SHEET A2. SITE PLAN A: ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: R & W ENGINEERING: GREG ROBERTSON (503) 292 -6000 A3. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CD 0 o Owner Project: Sheet Titl NO. ISSUE DESCRIPTION DATE DRAIN DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED 1 ISS UED FOR ZONING 5/6/99 RPH RPH co co IV1NB AT &T A Wireless TIGARD DOWNT COVER SHEET Z A 1 N A fl•�CTS Portland. Ore 97201 . Cell Site In TIGARD. OREGON a I KEYNOTES: O 11' -5" X 27' -9" PREFABRICATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER. 0 - - ....1 � 4 20' 0„ © EXISTING 100' -0" MONOPOLE TOWER WITH ANTENNAS. 1 8 • - -, i 1 © NEW 7' -0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ (3) STRAND BARBED _ I WIRE. FENCED AREA: 20' X 40'. 1 , I f 6 • 4 LEASED AREA PROPERTY LINE. LEASE AREA 20 X 40. =�:� 1 SITE AREA = 800 SQ. FT. ��' `;,�\ i NEW 12' -0" WIDE ACCESS GATE __ _ \� . . • . . • . • . pf , .. : 6 GRAVEL YARD \ 10' HIGH WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE, VERIFY EXACT LOCATION WITH _ l I : 9 WAVEGUIDE ENTRY PORT AT BUILDING AND TOWER. I f 1 + J 8 NEW ANTENNA PLATFORM AT 70' -0" LEVEL ' EXISTING US WEST AND ' AZIMUTH: 15', 135' & 255'. i SPRINT PCS CELL SITE I 9 5' -0" SQUARE CONC. PAD ` 1 O • . - ' t o 10 EXISTING FENCE AND GATE TO BE REMOVED - illki 0 NEW BOLLARDS AT EXISTING EQUIPMENT BOARD �.' - - ry Y0. . 0 H • 10 ' . 0 EXISTING CURB TO BE REMOVED i o • It ,., SITE PLAN ,°., E 1/8" a , SCALE: 1 /8 = l'-0" N O O u7 • O C.7 loomismoomilis CV ' o Owner: Project: Sheet Title: NO. reeve DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED IVI N B AT&T Wireless ISSUED FOR ZONING 5/6/99 RPH RPH co TIGARD DOWNTOWN SITE PLAN Z A Z 1800 SW 4th Avenue Cell Site c'N co /� n� Portland, Orego 97201 a /�� TIGARD. OREGON NOTES • . 1. TOWER DESIGN BY OTHERS. 2. ANTENNA DESIGN BY OTHERS. • t, -:,4 n I L , q M - v ?t: I7: 5i:1 iiiii `I"i EXISTING CELLULAR ANTENNAS I "" . ,ifii ii ii I;i I, I, � p t R{.�.�.. - - -.� 1 Ili P. liil I.,s, I; 11 i�{ :,, i :0 l I III!! TOP OF i!i f +i': ANTENNAS \rom PROPOSED AT &T CELLULAR ANTENNAS �am" I A li,; ,;1; an? A.i, O r. 1115 ;til' a+l 'Il iii;` qIN 0 ;i �' {t' r EXISTING 100' -0" HIGH MONOPOLE I ila III# 'j 11;:1 O li ;: i3js I ,II O j i { ii,i! 7-0" HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ (3) STRAND fill' 'il i BARBED WIRE. iqii 1101•• };111 ! PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE I`"' ?fill 'I E 'I'i, PROPOSED EQUIPMENT SHELTER iI Ii Il l , 11:II iliil NISI ,��.. y � ! I „ ' K x n v r,. r I 1 .... , _ y .. I. r < . a.,r{ I � � -?. ! - "ni``A '� r ...,. ..,�_. x tr °' i Y�' 'i� c i , '%1 r�' r n � ' II ‘....5..r 0•*' 1 T r j . , f ' t+ry' !,} ), � h j Y '.I ^ � 'C�'f. j FIN. GRADE , ; � I' ei 1 L,. - ': z`-' i ' 4.,r I ∎ �5�; :�h�d t `-�r == S- y}{�/r - {N'_ ;VW,'" I C � .,?`O `.��`I?e.' U E2 O) O) N NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION .4_ ° 1/16" = 1' -0" 1/16" = 1' -0" Ciri ° ca M t o NO. ISSUE DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED Owner: Project: Sheet Title: IV1F\IB AT &T Wireless TIGARD DOWNTOWN EXTERIOR t ISSUED FOR ZONING 5/6/99 RPH RPH N 1800 SR 4th Avenue = Cell Site ELEVATIONS Z A 3 co AA Portland. Oregon 97201 TIGARD. OREGON E • '= NATIONS - - - — *, i. . } r r - :Y2' •!� ♦ . { ' �'� 7 • • EVlS10NS • * 44 -' ' - � . , j: .+ •, r te \ � + 4 �� lY CNK , ' V f . s + • qq : . - • ���` . � , j 325 ••J ;[ � ?. • ^ • , + • +� il ••r ■ i t,, � , � . . t 1 ' rte • +' 1 ' .ti i , f2' <• .. .1 ++ '• I .,�y \� �� - r I ♦. • • tt� mar X1:1 / , ;;. , ,. • '� i wa� Tipp , 1 �. 11 � W I2' }+ + : : tl fi ki t' • • ■ \ , - f : . • • s•, •' . • *,',\\� ✓ �'� � .. i ' 4 ..,' 1 L� :N 23 42 • i . , , ., '‘var ''� '• •• hONGaN 122'46'05.33 • IV11! / � P a f ,, . . . J J _ . . 182.3 L / Street S , ri iri, ''' ..:,,*„...*:.- .......:,........., \ tl!ltD�l. I2' ,, :h. ti ••. :1 ...;:,.x.,41\.'"*, .• / 4 �� O C' , •x .� Y S - '< atyurs per / " • e rr+�sFa� r vR r • ' ' I: ' • Ik ---------„,..... j 1 / 41kg / / ( j‘ \ .. t .I5 : _.), ' , 0 4, 4- ''''' ' ' : t`...Y1 ' / t 1 1 0 . .0 Vit No 9f4N ,./ i. ,, .r. f �. • r_jir4 • r II _ N. u S WEST Communicgtion •\ 40' / . : fr k '. '� � / \------------------.-------''''-'-'----.' WIRELESS PR „A 111P-41... ......m.. / -z. #, VIre t3JECT , / ILIONEY , all 4N '. *# 3 X11®1 e' v . \. • '• +•• �. ' �r P 4 ,� 'r te tl �„ r 1l� \ �f / • � ; * , • ++ • I • . .. -. f ,i..�- �/.P��.[' e / p � \ F• u�'T. A a ,T 6 4 . , .srr \ / _. f V� . : •+ 1.. ' / / '�..�, +.� ALMJ IISE ° w 2' \\\ . • \ SITE INT t • • r ISSN k7f' ,��' ' •T • • 2'a } ,T F, PIA riir— % . � �y : + + ,+ • • 6711 :N 43 23 42.0 , ♦ 1 �c � a 3s 4 t '' + LONG:W 122'46 05.33 .'� � `t' + � +' % • • : 162.5 /ANSI A i,�+ , r r / � \ ♦ • • +-` #P '�'3 'r�',[�, - F .� -q 'fi'�h*i * di k . ' . 0 .44• A *4 40 \ + • +, + i7 , 9 L, 2't I { I . , r ' + • ♦ • ` � 1 -1 .. Ira '1 6 • ” x ' i�",I , . 1 ■ P ' \ . \•\ \ • •• , . . . +' ' �� - � t � • ` } e ' • u • �� ♦q � • • \.. • + • .+ + / f \ . . 3. • .f r o- j" ,.. i - yi u .• d- 7 r - -7•:"--- \ 1 4. , , ,. rAw ♦w.5• t•y1 • + : •�+ . ? a• a C *s rhr 2' I f , • ., • : Architects sa \ !! Via . . _ \ ;a,. o- / \ • \ t 1•, •••+ '••. / \ i1 _ , - Engineers, p.c.. • �' A -aV // \ //\ ) \ t I `` r' / 555 yton Suite A \ •♦ • • • •• . Edmcincls, WA 98 020 • •• • •• ' / Q �� (tas) 670 -86e1 FM: (206) 712.10844 • 4 % t \ elri u MI / \ l o• i Nom ' i �� \--- i , ` ` } ,..„,:„... 7• ! �f=tl7 E y \ -t j 1 1 \ + \ - • 6 's % . ya l. ' . ' IAQPIeTIC Qg Mr ATION 20.00' ~ .w...n0 80 -�� �' ' uses MAP. Q UAD. 8EAVERTON QUAD \ AQt 6T�G I? ttL IE11ATt4 u ses °0 1484 ..:� }' • QUADRANGLE, OR t 9$4 20 10 0 20 ' { . QUA SEAVERTON QUADRANGLE, OR ` re•rh h•., ;� SITE PLAN • [1TEINFORMATION SCALE• 1 ' '— 0 � SIT E A REA AIL A E• : � i • SPRINT 00-LOCATE 2$ 1 2Ap TAX LOT 2000 �f1t1(T'�fL�' t • SITE Sprint - 1.) This is NOT a boundary surrey. This t. a topo'9rophioal/Inforrnationol survey o 4 CO Locat The bounds information shown hereon is o raphic depktioln of a legal description ►�Y 8777 S.W. BURNHAM STREET d .• • illPr , ND S UR Y. YING , ' Tff41i: WORT UftLl2ED FOR THIS FRQtFCT NUS PROVIDED HY Western American P roperty provided b y the title insurance oornpany identified above. The scope of work for this t? 'ANY. ORDER NO. 6542,31-Pea EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 16 1997 � ,, gI1'f �R; PQ 07�A survey does not include bowndpry roeollrtkyn, there is no worm a2' rots ponsibtl ' expre or implied ¢� to the actual position of the b o n , "�' it�r Ti Tigard, rd, 0 R 9 72 2 3 ' Y lines. , $ , at IO ! 1 11A PPING & GPS 8777w ti WTI life _�.. BURNKAM 2) STREET AEwa:110k >� >/ Basis of Bearings for this eurrey is record information and found monuments as A leap! ae fond in Section a, Range 1 Wad of tthe � S�t rs� f' �� , O rested on the ns�,nq T1GAR 0REGON 97223 r • l ` . 1N11kimett4 Weldon, in thin o/ Nord, County o/ Washington 3920 O NAM Water District 3. *wt. of Elevations t2' * either fop :7d benchmark, as noted. or Global Positioning POR 075A x i tn4 Qt Oregon. %,91_ � �'/r 0� 6177 QMMER Wan* 8841 S.W. Commercial ..- :� ,. System (GPS) Cato (glee note no. 4) ; ' � _ Tig ard, Oro�on 97223 4.) latitude. Longitude and elevail,.*no ore derived from a Trimble ProXL GPs receker D ESIGN TYF'C L Osstlan For this PorotL P$ ( ) AC t1i9 $. d4 -4 L �Q Amu*, Pf • iA11GB x Achievable aGc ► d .` .r <at uaidnLo Carrier- CA. 043 !! A ,,_ ( Phase dote) is post processed Sow r►q this method. ~---^•--- ^ ---- -- * 4 ;+ ' . *.itil Phan-,. (610) 401 -• 0 191tr (610)1 - 48 tthtc 2 t TAX T • �LpT 2__ 2S 2AD ooe MT A*14 Or ‘14111,Y1441 ►mot M P0LE Moss: ( ) '239 - 'id 1 Mid MLA Qi +alR.i�OT !�ItAa a' N Q # XX So. iL - - . _ • s \ i 14T* 4Qr D'4 4d est S�4 t' Q3 )N 4 (N�+D :�N �� � w ar of or � w � 22* 46'05.33" t 2.a t 1tAYlOpr GROt{ND EL. A NN It 16 b' ' T IE YATlO N /t� TAN A •-____.. / A + DECtDtl4t TRH o• EVERfiiiVEN 7RSE iJ1t#R CPS RMA AS St14 SEE TE t i . ' TOPQGRAPHiC SURVEY Y . � i,� 45 - FIRE *DONt • • •• UTILITY 99 , (� i1 QNt/M y * SURWY 1Z4,6 SURYEY RECORDS of wA SHINGTroN I, • / Ruben M. Martinez, a R is.ered Profeasio Lord Surveyor Lksn sed i ' j/ E Lx3KT POLE �r� under the Laws of the State of Oregon do herbb -- certify that the SITE Fpm focatlona, LatiludN curd Larpttude coordinates (!i[AD 53). observations and NANf IDiF elevations os shohrn thereon ore on hosed u a field survey perform b ' me or under my sup,4rvislon Marc7, and that th• bounce y • 0 . SET STAKE No Sketch of base Parcel not provided: t GO ,0 SPOT a _ Si'0 T lines and eassrnents as s hown ors Dosed h entir ety upo N e Fn A * r N¢RETE , Research COMPANY Order No: 6 239 -P99, and o accurate to the best my SHEET NUMBE a A y,I CONTROL. POINT 1. ry port provided by Western Amerlcorh Pro INLET knowledge and belief. 4 J 15TINC l ��ltE LINE t . TELGo BOX _. ,F BOUNDARY U s Ruben M. Mortines Oregon P•LS. 2,38 Date �' 1 , - 3,, . , ASPHALT w BQ4lNiaAft • UNDERLYING' PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION } VICINITY �: G e� ED. ` . YiN a C N ITY MAP l� (tdAP SOURC T1i0MAS i S 7 PAGE 655 GRID F , LEGEND ,, f NT .S. � T SURV YO .. _ .�. � . E R CE RTIF CATION 1 PORO76A DWG /1997 ii, + l t;. •' y . •t , . `: " °t 4 . y •f . , '+ 1 , a • •1.. . ? .< 04 -25 -1997 • ' __ . �i ?' t ' 1' " { .fi r r �,,.: • s , ti „ ' t; ' � t �., ti d- a f{ . , �•1 t .•1 V, } x , � IY' 1' F. , r . / • ,s s 1, ; p� .4 � , ?) • V , �' �. ti,` � i• 1 , � -X, 1 ' ` ,. t ' r �,! I • i, r # t I 'yN } Y ' . ..Y j , G' - . , f ( '',:\ l L .r• 'F- r� 7 #. 1 • , r, ' ,}y •' l�, "' •4 S "� . �j' ,t - a > J ?r ' 1 ` • ..,�,^ b t u ,i .. 4 p c •Z • 1 7• r' ,1 r ,i • y • y , ,r .l" , • , f' ,. y ? , V. v r y L ** frA r I, COD : 1 'S i k hJ•. �`Y:� a te.. - . e; t J , y ' i _ i .,l�` ` s • 3 q . ' , , Y . a: . i . , ' 111,1° : t .' r =': ti4rs F;°, y , - ,' F x t f fi'. �> , M ONOWW \',� ` ' " • • , 1' S ,'!1 . qq `r w S 'x7 ry y.. EXIST. f O NER POLE r . 2, i '. tuf . • tl•S :F •4" . L Fr ' ; • i t . � T}` `� , f : S t . .1, ' , /N�EEW QUIPME�NT�yLC�B A81NETS' 360, 430 • '' -, \-.'', ,,333. '• = g 1 ~{ - L • � r: , > � -ON ('+1':•} SA r -., . CO . f: ! � ; ; f t .,., ' : r , ; , 1 1 ;,,i A2 A2 IM , Cho) . i, XiST.E t � O .i' > n aA k ./ ' 1 y k ' t' n 0 � p, ( 1 ` ( N • • [S 'H ••�:i; 1.., Y , r + ;v ' *,ry ,. ;.ti, l::.,.t. :^I ', n t ,�:'.�f' y ,! �:i,•.';•.' ,r''.. ,,. r,.. {r,r5:': ,, •.,. :P i; • • r, 1 t , a, ti f' ,;,i. •' t•. r.. •'a4,. ,,•,,;:.;c:' "Y ,.c + M . . ,, , • �. , , �a�t „r ': ; ; r. , ' , , • , •. .: ' r;G:. � .; .r: ,1, � ; �.+ ,. r:', :.; < '. ., ,`r„ , > , TREES ABOUT, re, HIGH), • 'J t o } Y yX> ' • ', 4 t1� : .�:r y, , t,•. :. A ,Ii I. • '". . .' ., ,'t,' , J,.', (1 V OU'� ' YO ! y , •7i ♦ •i,,•4'..1.1, ¢ � .4,,t', -:' t:' ii:' f • a : , ' " %S'1 , ,5. , , ' } l i . > ; , a � • • , 'i j . E 1 1' ^ � � • :l'w'' •f'Y':i tt71�j .fi: ,.1' ?. 1 •/Y •' .• ,,:k.,4,"-;5„;;;;,;,, �f •� - ,1 y {y�� + , � -1 `• : r. ` -;Fr } � �.. , rv, ".7 I. 1. .�i•.�: rr �� b.. '`r` r•.� . 6 E , :,. { ' ,� Cy Vii'•r4`�'Y ,{ F', Y+ ••• „• "':,,- ' .'ti �. 1;lr`'. � " 0 4(40 ,CC • 1 . • �r: ,� y� '� i3': 'SvM �,.Pi'.1' .'v' .1;; • ' h'„' n 1 _.. 1 e Ai it•i ',i��' , . � '^` -` `4'�' 1.' '.' ' , °�, au• ✓' ^'+ .i "�> � .,'� ��'ti :':aS ,. r , , , .�C r '� ti +. �` '' •s " gdd�trPlSld� .41 % � >. • ; .; , • i r, , ' EXIST. FENCE EXIST. FENCE UNDERGROUND POWER LINE 4t LJI� • FROM UTIL. POLE #346 r WEST • ELEVATION -*� • , .i. , : I At 1 /g" 1';p" / /y cn 0 ' (0) , , / Q pc 1 • , ; a \ ., ' w , EXIST. 5' LIGHTNING R00 ' { .' c) • CC r,,: 11 1 1 T 1 7 • 5, ‘ Irv. ' 2 OP OF MONOP i , t�T EXIST. ANTENNAS ` rt � , ., O NEW ME A. DISCONNECT (...) Lil , + • 2 y ki• 562A 365 C. ; • A3 A2 , ,1 t ' I H i a . ' > • ' . o i EQUIP ENT CA: NETS 419 'NEW ANTENNAS (6) II ( 436A ON CONCRE SLAB, � o l ' : . , ' A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 •� \ ��� r` I t . � /^ t ., _ ; ' 0 ,,, 2 01 - '" X 20' -0" LEASE AREA k r I 90 . _/ ' \�, `' EXIST. MONOPOLE I�' .. - • • ' O \ 4 \ . , , SEE STRUC. fNFO. . • 24 I! IC '' AC1 ° NEW CABLE Rl�f! • .a A A IM : . � L , �'' 2 z s 4/09/97 RE VISED CABLE RU #' i > i �p 3/31/ PERM REVISIONS , } : ; .1 / PERMIT / s E SET ,,,: JJ i ' ' 3 t 2 P T` ` c a 1 3/3/97 ZONING REVISIONS , _ N,. >>, • I ' 2/28/97 ZONING SET r .4 4 i . _�, EXIST. GRAVEL 9 I + • REV DATE of9cwPnoN ., a °`:4 i EXIST. FENCE 6' - 0" HIGH k�NAOEN - - ' ; 4 , ARCHITECT/ ! , ■ �' DRAM 9Y • • • . f , . 4 IV/ . . A . 4 JM DA , I ,. • I 0 1 NEW GPS UNIT 1141 . � EXIST. MONOPOLE W /� Architects P4amero w Protae�orgl sr+na char . J ss `. W �` �1 "esvaaooa �i Gro�sl a+. i • • 4 . . r EXI ST COAX CABLE I4 i Fi n 1 '; ' ' i — • EXIST EQUIP. i r , t • b ,, CATION f ., „, EXIST SFitfNT CTRUN _ ' • �+ UTiUTY DEMAR TION B OARD 8 �,_ 595 NE 122nd AYiENUE t r , r ; ,p s o �, . SUITE 221 il•`' , , . ' EXIST. CURB PORTLA ORE 72 34 w � .4/ l' ' •.: . ., 3, N 9 I EXIST. EQUIPMENT x ' ' ,, �' • , .. j • i • . . EX IST. PLANTER `‘ 4 „ : . , , O ,. ° : �'. XI CURB A. Rat ; . ;r , t ` • • r' EXIST. FENCE - _ _ • ! `R EXIST. 1 #; , k y y ,,. > EXIST. GATE 12' -0' I a a Y. , . f . r sr ti . - . —• _ 4' . ?- .._ ,+•. °.' V • h- :�.” ! ) y r, l (WI (2) 6' -0" GATE LEAF a '> i 'r , , '�` 1 y �� _ •'" , r t h� '� ..r , r ;a ter. f f , f, -•'�^ t, ". ryy 1 , c 44 r �y� 1 ' 1 Ul ' � r 1 ' .,'. + 0' \�•• r 4r F • � 'iK'.•r; ,•r ,� `✓,r'4 fr, a " . 1 a ' p , l F „ ,, i i I 1. ,i•r 'i1' .:, 7 •' `� ,_ . ' i , . 5 , ▪ Y , '.'�Cf ` a , c: :''ly ! '1,+ .,! ' f T �.,�, • ,'. l r � , IC" „ �,, `�, '.F „� � v Y, ; 3' '�� ' I, ,—.1 10.' • ,1• •/A�l �•�' ✓r. S Y ` ' ,, f', • fi � .� . �. '{ 1 ' . S ' , 1 ,.. a .' • l ' E i ,AAA t : . 4, r •+ r «` y't5+ Y ! 5 , n • Y 11t:, w' a' ' ', a 1 :-,r.-.. , } q� •.Y,'' _ _ , ?p t�4 ; r ,. - . _ + ✓, .R: •.i e..N,lorr ., W i r. , .+„'riA A'li WlarW+ . (.t'., ' - - 0 1 r t01. �, +' . SPRINT SPECTRUM ; t +' , p �` /r fry ]t; Y .�`•'''• _r,I y d 1, ,., • _ f _. #�', �' �.' , s . EXIST. FENCE I i�'' y . f NEW METER/DISCONNCT A EXIST. 10' 8777 BURNH : ' , • • �'�, .' A 1 ; . , ' '; ' r 1 03,1 CONCRETE SLAB 2 ACCESS EASEMENT TIGARD, OREGON' n'' ` y '' J , ; r 1, c, , c)-e r ,._. 97223 „ :, ' • t 'k A � , q,:; , + . i. ' z ' ■ ", , 0- - 1 NEW EQUIPMENT CABINETS 4 ,..�� _,_ _.__... O RA�MNQmlE W , Z , a> v ` t N • (.�, CQN '�•� - _ -- .' - - , 1 ° :. Ii rt ' + '� '�{ .,. !• , ,': ` e•. '', • ON CONCRETE - i . i v'1 AI . + ,��1'` ,,,lull a A2 A2 , ,. ' 3 S a, ri --I' . ' . ,3•, : �" ' , ' : M �-t - r — NORTH 2 I ', $ ,r F r :' n,. , 's • - P ��,', {i .,;'^ t' '42••13-, '. -' �,ik .( - .+ . A t ' t r ' ; , r y �'' -♦. ' �f �S T �, ��B�i I.Ti7a7 �.4+ • 1. "� `• • ! i '� • ` .) • a .. &:,'` t E UIPMEN �.: 4 k Q PLAN r;.� * ; , : 1 ��'' j r: � ;. , , _ NQf►.fVAT�QN _. �_- „ „ : ' . r .. 4 �'� ' �" l N f „ ,4` f. }' 4 +.—.., . w..ww...r:.raw..rhpl.,ar.. _�....^r ' • 1 " ,• ., , 3 i. � . _ N r I !' a ' 1 r t • ly, T a:, . . „ 4 •a .b iiL_• =d•4 4 k , ,1 f � , , r7 - `, r 1/4 sa 1 n,-O 1i - lO�j + >, a „f ' �� r� " ,:' I. '. ; 1 ,, r r t ' a f j .t 1 t — ^Q,,r' 1 y 1 Y, i i S kf • f w b ' '} ,,V , t ' ,r • �� ,: '11.j; s + 04 �49 �. • .,: ., ,i. _ I. K . , } + ,, a ' w_ . �i ,f••�n q4 + 'J J r � ,, � ,, _ ''+ * ! j" a , v ' , j? t ,: ,• $' rr4 T J . ' ;�+ . 1 .,d , R = . « . i , ` f . � ' £ . '- : :y'i F.! r,ti1' - ? "r ° 'i'ri ' } � + j { � >.r a E_gy tl . , ' 4 • • • .� + • rr`l� r+ z • 't •�1'• • ,'l! r •f: ,. s . + t ., {r, ;'• ! f a ' . ,. ' i ° , d , , ' ' • � a 7 f Y T'' , . t . +1 4' t •, _._ . ' y , F • r ' .' . Kt :.� J7 If • � ,q ;ma _ , •:.,' , . r. . Pi liv• . . .. . , . . . . t, . , , 4 ,.. •, :.:*-• .,, ....). „,,'`.., - . , • ,,, . .. . , . . . • , •-wr ., . . Li •,, , . . . .: " , , . . . , t ,;, C . . , . . . / , • 4 ' H ..4r,t.',.' ' . e -,:' . . . . % ' ,' ' . - • ' 4 '',,,.: ., ' 4" , ' , '-t:Tir''':■' , - , - ‘ ; " • '. ,.,, . , . I' .4,;:';' .y e..1:1-A. . • " .1' , ;'. ' t.„ foi t .,., . 4 !: r • . . . LEGAL 'DESCRIPTION: • - ' - , , • , , • a c A PARCEL II OWNER: APPLICANT . . , , ,, I', , . • ,,, I ,•!' Y,"■ 4* • . , 14...;.:4..,, ..• ' c r e ' .• • • • , ,...t. • ' ' ' . US WEST COMMUNICATIONS F ,t • , ; . f-)Y1' -i ,- t, , ', ' 4 , ' .; '',v . ',,f- • ‘. , 4 . . SPRINT SPECTRUM q.., ':. . c ,,,. ... - , . A tract of lo.nd In Section 2„ Township 2 South, Range 1 West of P.O. BOX 23562 5950 NE 122nd AVENUE / *. OREGON ELECTR RAILROAD • the llamtte Merian In the Ciy of Tigard, County of TIGARD, OREGON SUITE 221 IC , , le,:r..it:. ,-_,-; .....-,•.; i.. '-:.' '- , . Wielol, t i't,, ,,tr''' '17 k r; • r. f p . • el • (50' WIDE R.O.W.) Washington tend State of Org, ol eonescribed as fol(ows: - • . , 'i'' I. , . . ' — ' "4 0 ■ • (800) 877-7746 PORTLAND, OREGON 97230 , yee I • • • Beginning at • , ., • ';',- , , : • a point of intersection of the Southwesterly right of . , , . - ' ,.,.e,Y.., • POWER, POLE 1,346 • . 4, ,)„ _ . way ti o f certi 50ft ti o f an . 00 srp o r i ight of way conveyed to . .,..,‘,.• ,,, ' the Oregon Electric Rallviay Company by James R. 01Mara and CONIACT• • \ li f tht CO . • - . , . . • . • Mar Y C. O'?Mara, his' wIfe, by deed dated January 4, 1907 and CONTACT i • • i!...-:• -. , ,, ,, ,, . •7 • • . recor • C , . 1: c, .:;,2. : : I , ' ' .. • 1/2 IRON PIPE • va* \ r oieo l February 16, 1907, on Page 40 of Book 75, Deed ZONING APPLIC6,11.0N BUILDING PERMIT APPUC/5TION , ,, , ;,.,.: . • ) / . . Records of Washington County, Oregon, and the west tine of the .‘,. '.i.e, . , , . . ALEX PERUAAN DENNIS PURDIN , . e. er 4 I'' i . I • do ° • 0 ■ 41 ND GRO . 58? West alon the Southwesterly ri • , UNDERGROUND ROWER UNE --- . , ,,, \ William Graho.m Donation Land Claim No, 39, said point being WALTER GROUP BECHTEL CORPORATION • THE monumented by an, iron pipe) thence South 43' 00,7 West . f . ! `!:, ; ;,. ' - • ' ', • I-' FROM UM, POLE #346 - ., . 4, •Ir • • . 812 SW WASHINGTON 5950 NE 122nd AVENUE 11 NM ' I 4 • / z, along the weSt DenatIon Land Claim tine a distanCe of 354,3 SUITE 850 SUITE 221 • --- - - /4 ,i, \ (. 4 , . feet, more orless, to the center line nter line of County Road No 977) . 141 ,),..,, ' . ,' , TREES (AR ABOUT 60 1? ,,--•.:- , ' HIGH) , , , • 1 , i , , ' ' ' ` \ .-- 4.110, • thence South 45' 04? East along the center line of said PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 PORTLAND, OREGON 97230 , ' • . . ,W.:,•',1, .• ' , .. _ "*"."--------\\ (.-, . ‘..,• •, 4" \ . County R00.011 a distance of 95,75 feet) thence South 0' 21? (503) 525-7833 (503) 251-7292 e' ',/ . ' ' \ , * 1 . West a distance of 132.33 ' feet to a point, said point being ?•; . ', 0 , .e.• ' • NEW EQUIPMENT CABINETS -1 il. . 10* 0, ftial , 44 .I' ' ; Z. ,...,-!.. • : / 0 .0 0 \ rionumented by an iron pipe' thence South 89° 41? East, a • ON CONCRETE SLAB , ., \ • 91``,`,:.:‘,',•c'•_ •. -': , \ • distance of 368.55 feet to a poi i the e:center line of County .., . . I „:-.,„,,,, , 4 /* \ Road No. 227 to a point on the Southwesterly right of way line 1' ',''-' ',.. :• . 1/4n • •/ •/ of the Oregon Electric Railway Company, as aforesaid) thence , t..1: ', • ' ez 4, - • s • i • , EXIST. MCNOPOLE " ' • 'f,"iN' •'' 4 / `N ,, \ 4 • North . ' g ght of way a ; : 0,11 N I., line as aforesaid, o distance of a9163 feet to the point of M ,,,,,, ;; `,:: , . • • ' , .,; - W/ NEW ANTENNAS I , i , , ^ 4 1114 it Ale \ .; ' • .! ' : I 4lk 4'1 „ . .4 . . 4) , . . \ , • / # • . beginning, 0) . „w•-, : - .- . .., ,. • , • , ,•/\\,.... i V . 4, , 4. A. \ - ••,.. , • • EXCEPT that parcel described in a Street Dedication to the 4,' ;:. . I Co ' et .‘ . \ . / . " _ . k • . • • ' , a t . ' • d -,.-!•, i I: OA, ..• 1 4 purposes, recorded September 30, 1986, Fee No 86044437 SITE ADDRESS: • \ public for a perpetual rIght-of-wo.y for street, road, And utility . 2 , V„-• ' , ,,,• ' . EXIST. FF_NCE i - . .4 4 0: • / / \ , . .4 • . . •-, • ., ' . , • • it. „. .. • • k,', • ' - ...N • a ‘ , Ns> • . - -: '•.''...- ' , I t' 411W,./44 ., • I • ../.., \ ' SPRINT SPECTRUM (e, ,.. , \ \ II) e z9 (/ lb.* Ili -0:440,:.,•, • , . , ,., A : . , 1‘11,,<,,, .., , , \, is / 1 • . PARCEL II: 8777 BURNHAM . . • , . . . ......... ,, \ TIGARD, OREGON 97223 t OC • \ / Vellip , \ - , . \ \,, • / V • • ,p A tr . fl,: • .1,. ,, • ' 1 . . • t ' ' '. - -A - --.; ' . .,..,, • act of land in Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of CO 0 • ,,4„:i \O 4 .0 . 4 4 4 ,, \ the Wittariett e Meridian, In the City of Tigard, County of rtz!,( P , 1 .. . . t .% ,' %. • . ' ' . ..1r 44 ,,° P \ ,, , \ ,. . \ • do , 40, . • Washington and State of' Oregon, described as follows: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 0 , .. • Beginning at the point of Intersection of - the Southwesterly right AD r = i f ' •Z. 1 " , .. ' ‘.•;0 ,* !,,‘t: ', .,*,• * ' ENTIRE EXI PR ARE * ftl 4W( t • t( 14111: '■;> \ \. . r. . 4 % ., ,,, , .. 4_, • , ,,,,,TAA,LELNArTiopo EXIST MONOPOLE co D Wi RMUNIslaCIAOTIE0Q14u,IFPANICEILNITTY AT LOCATED T GRADE AD E - Ca \ , + . . \ \ ',, 1 f' ., r -, 4,, : ,'• ' * , • : , . '' . \ • ef way tin o e f that certo.in 50 foot strip of right of way convey LEVEL AND (3) ANTENNA SECTORS WTH (2) PANEL ANTENNAS AT EACH SECTOR ed I, < •, 4 ' ‘," \ , to Oregon EtectrIc Railway Company by James R. O'Mara and ,e,,, l' e,,l■r./e, , r . AND ONE GLOBAL POSITIONING ANTENNA leOUNTED ON EXISTING MONOPOLE. (.../ ,.., . ,. • • ' .! ', ' ::, 4e, \ \ - • , 4. ..„,,, . 0 • . Mary C. 07Maro,' his wife, by deed dated January 4, 1907, and , 01 1 84 9P1''''•' -.', '' • ,.. • ' .: ,f. 4. . ..: ... - --- . . 4,./:\ ■ 4 \'''' . \ • II% 0 o'l. \ ' recordeo l February 16 , 1 907, on Pe 40 of' Book 75, Deed ag .4,... i ' ‘ i ' :. ' ' ' ' . : , . 1 ' ) •., ' s \ E/31', 10'-0" e • 4 e - ;,..'4.., ' --e• * ': i 1 a i .: t , 1E4 :' , \ •, 4 • 4,/ • , Records of WoshIngton Ceunty, Oregon, and the west tine of the PROJECT INFO: Ci) . % 1") • *lip William Grand.il Donation Land Claim No. 39, said point being .. . .., . ' ., d * . , , .‚ -.. .. • .... • . • • • • • • S A „. ,. ,. , . rore or less, to the center of County Roaci No. 997) thence JURISDICTION: ' CITY OF TIGARD . , ACCESS *I \ - _ . 41 . %1 ' . CONSTRUCTION TYPE: NA qi •., ,.,.. , „ e• . \ / • OCCUPANY: NA 01I) < --.. ri d 4 w ir e o s n i p j ip o e n ) 9 t c along said west donation land claim line a distance of 354,3 feet, e.‘" ,, • . UNDERGROUND TELC.O. -.-:•.----- - ---- — --- • , . • 4 .- l. \ \ ID , . I*, 4 \ NO. OF STORIES: NA 0 < k . . 4 . .. TRENCH (APPROX. ,,LOOATIPN).... - .. :. i -• \ - ../ - \ .." ..-- ,5 TAX PARCEL NO,: R0461306 'ie,e ; e-":, ,. • e '•. ' e ••••#/ • , k , . \ 104414. w . 0: 0 : Wounstty BUILDING CODE: UNIFORIA BUILDING CODE ,,. Road No, 997, a eiLetance of 241,44 feet) thence North 43' '4° \ i ' 0. 2 • ...• , ,,,,, , . ,,,- , ' , I e " 1 : , 1 N \ .. • ,. : i , . \ ,, \ \ ..0",/.) 0 . 007 East a clistanCe of 367,75 feet, more or less, to a point on the .t4 •1, -- 7 • . f....,,,,,,,,,,, . . 1 / 1 ' ; \ 4.. . ZONING: CBD - CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT . 1 ,,, 1 1 ' -' • 'V ,,,, ,./4,/ \ Southwesterly right of way line of that certain 50'fi5ot strip of ADJACENT ZONING N-C8D S-CB : D E-CBD W-CBD ; , , , • \ EXIST, PLANTER \ (15Y, \ ,,,,, , „. „- Ay \ 4 • , right of way conveyed to the Oregon Electric Railway Company 174,489 S.F. . , 111.1*10 ..7 0 SITE AREA: CZ ' 2 • .. - • ' l ,' ./ i 1 /1 / , . \ , .. '',.. 4 ■ • . ::i .: ' ' ' . . ' • .. ... • • " .''' I , , / , , , • . \ , ., • " / 4, \ by Rudolph Huiziker and S.C, Hunziker, his wife, by deed dated /-• ,- • .- -- , 4 ,.. December 13, 1906 4rd recorded February 16, 1907, on Page 39 • \ \ LEASE AREA: LANDSCAPE COVERAGE: 400 SF. CO 1 1:9 ▪ ,,...; ' „ , .; ',! e r r ..." .1' .., _ \ ' \ \ . . , IMPERVIOUS SURFACES: 0 N. • ...„ • 6, • of Book 75, Deed Record* of Washington County, Oregon, 1 16 5 , 6 4 , 00 489 S. 6 F . . F. (9 e,f,„, .•: e,,, : , , \ \ . \ thence South 41' 38? East a distance of _242.25 feet, more or mi 03 •. ...... .. .. . ,. , , / .. 1 , , . . , \ EXIST. CURp , . 0. ,, ,.„. •f„,- '. \ \ . lng ki thwesterty right of way line t o the point o f • . , \ \ / ,, , 4 ,0 • ., . ess, ato sa Sou ' beginning. • \ ‘\ \ ‘\\ .., o • le* . 4 0 ' . -. ' ■ ' . ..,:,.., EXIST. ASPHALT PAR,,ING-tAT" , . ' . ' \ _ • \ \. . EXCEPT that p „ , .1 • .2' . . ., . . , , .& • A \ parcel described in a street Dedication to the • ''''\ ' , •,• ,.• .. . , _ • ',, \ ' \ . public for a perpetual rght-of-way for street, road and utility i /..., , „.• ,e e \ \ 7/ purposes, recorded September 30, 1986, Fee No. 86044437, APPROVALS .. 1 , 4 4! ;' , ' '4 ',, ' SJ - : .: ..■ . - ' - . , . \ d . , 1 " • or • \ \ . 6 t fil \ • \ \ . AND EXCEPT tht portio II> , an of the a bove alescribeol parcel lying SIGNATURES F INVOLVED PARTIES INDICATE THEY HAVE REV THE • " I EWED r • 1 , 4 ! Ci,...' . A , i . , . „ . , \ \ \ \ • within the property described In a deed to Tuatatin Valley Fire ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS AND HAVE APPROVED THEM. CHANGES INITIATED . , ;-Le..'•. ' , , ,. . • „ , 0 \ 4* ,, . and Rescue District, recorded July 1, 1992, Fee No. 92045576. AFTER APPROVALS HAVE BEEN GIVEN MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND - , . . Jo . \ . .4 0 OR CONSTRUCTION COSTS. • ,0 .. •- .. , . / • \ ., . . . . „ _ , • \ ‘Sk. G" • , ' - - , • . :. e \i'.. \ \ \ . lio \ \ 4 0 4/24/97 BTS RELOCTION e l # L # PARCEL III: , • . ' " r / . • \ r‘ \ • a • to." ..- • 0 7„,e ' 4/9/97 REVISED CABLE RUN ,,,,.,,•, . \ \ \ A. \ DATE: ' , • A tract of lo.nd In Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of '',„P''t •:',-,, , . - 4, 4 • • - \ [ v. ,,, -. „.•,. , . , . • o the Willamette Meridin, n the City of Tigard, County of BECHTEL CORPORATION 3/31/97 PERMIT REVISION „,,.\\ c . . .. . \ .' \ Washington o.nd State of' Oregon, described as follows: ' t••e;„ ; ' . . . \ . /4,,,,e G • . Be - „.,,,), ' certain 3 t •. . \\,. \ - , , . V .., 46 g 7 in v n e in s g t a : a f si C ii o r u t n y ty co R r o n a e d r N US WEST COMMUNICATIONS DATE: 3/12/97 PERMIT SET - -,. ,, , ' \ \ \ NMaTfi \ \ . ,. \ . •. . , ' ,.. . . 3 97 ZONING REVISIONS / / , '... „ , .- \ \ „ c .- C ol o e u e n ol ty recorded in Eoo tra t \d i o f f cl i nv D e e y e e d d R Charles w s Burnham DATE: / It . „L \ \ A.1 \ \ .... • '‘.. viZi 4a n h h i n obny PROPERTY CONTACT 2/28/97 ZONING SET ,, fil.vt ,f..,:rc'', . 1,, \ Oregon, said inginning point loeing also the most westerly . , . • \ \ < N '' r• .' ' , NORTH ' corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to W.J . Kerry by REV DATE DESCRIPTION . — • • (7\ PARTIAL SITE PLAN ...7 North 42 9? Eat long ae . . .... ei deed recoroled In Book 146, Page 105, Deed Records; thence ,_ ... ,. • 1.,?-:i2, ' ' . ' 1s a the northwesterly line of said PROJECT , . : \....2 i ” 441 201, Kerry tract, 367.7 feet •to the westerly right of way of Oregon liMAOUI . titA 4 • • , Electric Railway Cempany) thence Northwesterly along sald AROSTECT/ , - ' ' . ' '' ,. 4 MMUS JM u . 4 . ' ,,, , • , . , , . , , ., . , , right of way tine 60 feet to a point; thence South 42 19? • ....,- . , agt West 374.23 feet, more or less, to center tine of County Road DRAWING INDEX ORAM BY TW 2 _5 97 ' • GENERAL NOTES V "..P . 4450'12' E 80,31' ...• a line of said Burnham tract) thence South .... . INDUSTRIAL 45 46? East 60 feet, more or tess, to the place of beginning. T TITLE SHEET, SITE PLAN, PROJ. SUMMARY, & NOTES • CtiECKED BY ,'' 4 , i ,- • c . ADA COMPLIANCE: FACILITY IS NOT STAFFED AND NOT 1443) nd the easterly ,,,, \ ,!., ,,, T. ri :. . tioNALLY OCCUPiED. NEW EQUP. CABINETS , .1„..• . .6. MC?: Ce0 EXCEPT that portion of the above described parcel lying withIn Al EQUIPMEN1T PLAN & ELEVATIONS ................. . . . iZet', , ,` . ., ` • ' 4 ' , • ON CONCRETE SLAB M property" described in a deed to Tuatatin Valley Fire and A2 DETAILS , Z. • ' • r, '' ' , ;., ., g A CONSTRUCTION SHALL 8E DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXIST. MONOPOLE 4 ' 7 ORGN EGIR # 4 194a • EO PFIC RALROADOG O Rescue Distr,Kt, recorded July 1, 1992, Fee No . 92045576 . A3 DETA ILS , .. rneeeee••••••••,ree.. ' '-`':' ' "i ' :g , '-',, ' i: • Au. APPUCA8LE COOS AND ORDINANCES. .... .• . (, ,.-, 0, ' ill 11 • , IL- ki: !.. .. 1 ' TOWER W/ NEW ANTENNAS Z..," v.-. Iv . El RISER DIAGRAM e 4 1 , ,4 ' A , 10 a 4 , ,..,- - it , I, % , . . ,. .. . .... -,‘ \ E2 POWER & COMMUNICATION PLAN Architects Planners A eneekee .? • e - •'' ' , . 3. nELD VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRiOR TO ORDERING \., 4 ‘4t. \ . . , e•' :. - .• ' • ' '' ' AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. UNDR TELCO. ,:, -- \ J P\ ' # • \ PARCEL IV: E3 DETAIS 342S 1304 Awe. U. $04,4 100 it.~. SA 611000■1306 (00) ?..Er 1 ' ; ,- , ,' (APPROX.) " -,; '-. ' \ ' \ \ L *. ,. •• • A parcel of lanol In the Southeast one querter, of the Northeast E4 DETAILS . . V 4 il, i '`•;.— • • '' '. . FOR SPECIFICATIONS SEE ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENT -• - .'e ,-.•,:. .• ' I', e,.441_ .. , • , . *TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS* .-.. /..,e' • • \\ ., . \ one quarter of Section 2, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of' , • . AsPHALT PARKING LOT ,,,,' ,::' - the Willamette Meridian, County of Washington, State of C-S TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 1 '.. . ; ; A \N-;-- . \ - . Ore?on, In the City of Tigard, being more particularly described ,5. ANTENNA ROUTING IS SCHEMATIC. CONTRACTOR T9 , 1 t•,; f: • • • ' ' DETERMINE SIMPLEST ROUTING. \ / 'ON\ \ . as' oltowsi BE4INNING at the most Easterly corner of that t . • .- .. ,w,,- . ' .- - , 1 \ property conveyed to , Davis and described by Deed • e,,7 . :, t - i ' ,., , • ..,- :' \\ . \*. ' V Joseph W D o • recorded August 23, 1966 in Book 61, Page 441, Washington 6 ALL ANTENNA PIPE MASTS AND HARDWARE SHALL BE \\ \ _,\ \\ ` \ . .. ,. :,„,. , ' . I re g: ,, ; '. . ' '" - GALVANIZED. ‘tet \ i \ County Rcors, a .• N.,_ \ ed sid point bin g on the Southerly rIght-of-way , • ,. •• , line of the Oregon Electric Railway Co.) thence S40 ? ' . ..,,, , , . 7 . PAINT ANTENNAS , PIPE IAASTS EXPOSD CABLES, AND , E \. \ \ / 44 > / \ , . 1.5. . 077327E fol•lowin 82 feet to 1 g said Southerly right-of-way 115. ''■ 1 1 - ' ' - HARDWARE WITH AN APPROVED PAINT COLOR. . \ 1 / ■ Ne‘ \ . the most Easterly corner of t hat property conveyed to Jams R am. • i,. • . , • , • ' \ e .: .. , >> \ • 00 '. McGee and described by deed recorded Jo.nuary 30, 1973 In . . . ...er . - • • . ' a SUPPORT STRUCTURE, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL . OFFICE • ft / //;D ACCESS . \ It. \ us WeS/ 00/77/111//7k80/16 .... 1...\ , Book 907, Page 324, Washington County Deed Records) thence SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EACH INSTALLATION SITE ZONED: C80 I • \\* . . S44' 507117W followino the Southeasterly tine of said . . ). • . IN COMPLIANCE WITH 1994 UBC AND ALL LOCALLY fie/ .... • O 1% " ZON 'AN Eir = TRIAL McGee property 80.31 feet; thence N40' 077327W 115.84 5950 NE 122nd A VENUE VENUE . . . T .. rt : ; ' . I ' t APPLICABLE CODES, WHICHEVER IS MOST RESTRICTIVE. •‘) \ • • \ 0 ‘\\ . i, SUITE 221 01 feet to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Davis property; tir4 v00 000 • , , : • ,,, , . , .. • 41,( 10' ' • e" 5/117E following aid Southeasterly tine PORTL, OREO t . Nit. Ai _ torl AND GN 97230 , \ .1i „,,,g`!" zY / EAsotENT \ 'tr ‘ \ 0 thnce N44 0 1 feet to the Point of' Bel containing ,267 square -ere ?la k•e,... '' . . •. . 9 ' AT STEEL FRAMES REMOVE ALL BURRS AND BREAK ALL \ , SHARP EDGES. A ' EXIST. FIRE STATION . \ ee• • - ,,,,„97 . feet, or 0.213 acres, , i.;;V:. , , . • ' \ . _ \ e.' .‘ . . .. tei•%•.'1,, 4 ' ,„. 19 NO TE \ . . /2/4•....,._ , • . • • .•Ifi'‘44.DAIPrei' . • ' " n n . SI GRADING REQUIRED . , ,/,,/ • ..,f‘. 3L'‘‘, f 'e;ee,e , •.:.'„ , , . .• \ . l e"; -'*''-- - - , eASIS Cf KARMA PORTLAND • •• e •.` •,...r. ',.'• • , \ ,..- • ' ....:••• ., e.=•' 'e - l'i . • ..; ••• • .p. THE SITE WILL NOT BE UGHTED . .. . - / ; iii , STATE PLME NN • - • Jar/ A. ROI ' ' • " . . • I t o . '. 0,°0 \ Aeo , :',, '. 1' , .', . . , 1 SYSTEkt NORTH ZONE \ \, , . - 401 1 ,11 . : •.: • - 4 ' , • ' • - ■ '- e , 1 *'' . ' - ... • 11, SPECIAL INSPECTION BY AN APPROVED TESTING LABORATORY EXIST LANDSCAPING . ./ . NORM *MOM °WM 1943\ , , • . • - 1 , . . . . ,,,..,.. ... •,,,,,,,,, ,,, : : . . • ' ,, .•-•,•.,,,,, ,, , - :. 41 ,.',,: :•; - '-,, ,'.‘ PILING REQUIRED OPERAT ALL STRUCTURAL MASONRY REGARDLESS ON ALL SITE WELDING, HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING, . • . ' N,,"•:. , • . ‘ • ....., \ ,.. , IONS, . ., , . • • I ' A Eng. cATE - .. • 4*41/44k. I . r . .. fli:•• . ••'-- - ''' ' — i. =---' • ',- . •,'•-•-• - , ",•• , NW Of DESIGNED STRENGTHS AND STRUCTURAL CONCRETE. SPECIAL \ cow.. it. - ‘i. ‘' - .4,.., : - , .,.. INSPECTORS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL . 4 • \ , P ., ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL . , . .. . .- . OF O ! 1 ‘' ,' :-. ' x' , , ,'■ t; ' . • . \ ifi> . Itc :r. STORAGE YARD 4 . .. , . , , 0..4i;, -, ,.. % •-r,• ..,,..;. ' , •. . ,, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION EAST. AHALT PAVING . n }-- POR-075A 1 .x._...a. • ..'; ••,.. •,, ,, a , ' 4% \ SP \ 4fr\r• . \ RUHL-PARR 4 ASSOCIATES • AER ENGINEERS, INC \ SITE % . . - . • . U) -, . • ,,,,,, .,, .:- .1) ' ' " NO PPRIATE0 PARKING-%. 3625 132nd'fAvENLIE S.E. 11155 120th AVENUE N.E. . 40 1 . . , A .,, ,:'--; ' , We MCI ROD W/RPO ,, .. . • # 13. ' SPRINT SPECTRUM. . ' . -.. ,.....,- ,,../.. -. . • • \ .4P N EXISTIK COO , ..,. . ,, ... I k., ,.. 'i':' " . , , , , . surrE 100 SUITE 200 ti, 8777 BURNHAM . . ,.. . • rittnil -,je: i,••• : e te, • • , • , , - BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 9800 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 • ' TIGARD, OREGON p .,_ • t.. , - P ;,. ic e. . 4 ..- • ' ' . • ' , ' . . PAIN ifAlkeSCAPINQ : * 1 \ 111 4 P ‘ # ' • —` . :' < • . . — -,. • . (206) 644 (206) 739-6051. „ . 97223 r, ,PrfA, ... ''' ' • ' ' ' '• ' ' . • \ ' . . • . 4 . Pi r• '-‘ ' '' '. • ' I . ' 4 • . ••• ' t '''• • • $ . . . , . . . • • 'i , t41.° 4 ;:.••.‘ , -', ', -` • • . . • e16410 W ' 1 )+!. 4 **0 • ' ;.;;:-. .:_ . . . •., i'#' ?. '.' , RaicommemAt. 4 14 46, ' \ t • \ '''‘,#, , ''' ' 1 1-4 !,,,,,,,I.11-A,, . 4,;.,,,,,r, ..1. . , , • ' Ntitki , . . , . ZONED; Ma . .. , . , V) ' •:,,i z.,...:. .,,•-• •,, .,. I,i'..), 'z '4';--- .,', , ' , . . ''''".# • -;` ' # in • STRUCTLIRAL , . . SURVEYOR COVER SHEET i I , r -, '41' iii'e'''•;;}. 7 ' • r6. '; ' '" '' , r4 1f . I , ' *At i ii ..1" ; 4,''t fi,,,ii Ae• ,1,.......ee .e. ,, - , • .. , . ,, , . . • . . , . ' - \ , • .... : , 4 DC -, CNOINEERS, P ,C, , PLAN , SITE s . 1 I. 7 4 k t V:4 1 I ' f .' ,. , , ' • . ' 1 ., ; ' : \ • ' ' ' ''. ' . ; " ' 14 OfnrOr , C 84.3f, , ,, , PREMIER ENcIHEXRING. INC K ARCHITECTS . ;:g4 , '.•' . • : !.:1,1gV. 4 . - ': i•••,... .1, , ';', '-.. ' '... I . -, , . , .,,, t • rk . • 3 . , • . ... t . .7***,••••• 20223 13Ist PtACE N.C. 555 DAYTON STREET .. NO TH .... , , , 4 *. , „. . , • , • . . , r • . r, , , r 1997 :N4,4";:kk,f. ' ' ,I .,.':y , , -• 7, ', :* 7 ' , c .' ,. ' , ' . . ' . , . . WOODINvILLE, VOMOTON 905R . SUITE A ' SITE. KAN/VICINITY INFORMATION . - ' - fr •I; ,•4•. . ' . , • ._, • ., ,-,,; . , • , , EDIAONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 ' . . - 41) RAW' ' '. - • - - -- ' '.• . ' ;',-' - ',', :- ' - * . , ' ;, . ',-, -.„ee• 'c..?„"i' . e - f. 4 "e i•••'.. ,, • , • e,',,,t'k,'' ." • 1.`, . . ..,1'. i-'''t, ,- 3' . -. ,' . .. . , i Tk. MAP , . 4 „,... •• ,,, •• -.1. ., ., , .--,--_,,,), ,--,,. .., •.. . . , " '. N 4 1 „ • W r j 114° * '' , ' ''' • * * *"*. 1 • * ,,**( •,, :14,• ,i ' ''.'• '**, ' %, ?;*' ., , ..S.;' ,*,";-. : 41 . S,c `' :. , ' 0 ?' : . * 1 ' 1 r'•:: . '.., '' ItKI)t 4 k ::, , 4... , V- '1,1 ..,;„., ..,, ,t' ,4'- , A- 0 .) , 4 e. f 4 • I r.. • • , Ei* -: v'.,,.'"•:'S' — , -. • ' We) 67 0 - 40 1 . - ' N.T.S. . , .: • 1,' e , ,- .•,, , , , • I •'-''', . '' '''' • , : ' ' aZ7708 '•• -,:.;.. y v .■ , , 4,r ., , , * ' . • , .i -- ,1 ‘ . P , • .. '"• .' ...,,•,,- • • • .A. •ii , • ,,, , .. , ,: . , i , • ( , , . • -,.,,.•, ., , .. , „ .. t . r • ' • ' '`' 0 4 - 2 5 - 19914 •e•„•„ ,,-- - ,: .,..,e, , ..ie.•...oreeli th f„.,:l.- • -... P,.., -...,::' '.-, j '....'t.. , . '.0 . ' ' ' • * 7 .,. '*. ' ,' * ),, ', : '; • '*, .;,, '•'!!, ' ,, ' 1 * ''' . * ' % . . . • •- .: ; .•*.* t '• ** i'' : 4.1 .. . t4'. 4 .. . :4; • r M - ' ' ' ' 4 ;;' ' ',:' ..z. . ',:-. . S'. .; - ,. . 1 .. . :, " I C '1 t: -. . 1 . . _. ' . ! ,' 4 r - 1. : t•''' • , r , ' ' ' '. . ''..,!' . ...,. • . , : .. '., f , ,...... - -sf'.. P- - 4 . ,..• •-., ''' -,, , .,,,,, ,' . . ., . ••-: -, . , 3 7 t ,t 4 y '�'rip� - �� ^a *'}. , } s : ft : i , li t. �r • t . •fir. - ' . -- t t „1 !i;- i'v: %4'f,'r ,1 ; 'p y - 1 ■ - 1, t ; , t •y: , 1. ► •1,. +.� 1;4 .► i A �. ►. ,i . .► 1. I. .. - 1 2 O (Q •1 , � , t •j • Z ` 4 1•.zl ) , : c.y. ' ' , " - 1 - - d ,• N mow.... ( , '` :. _� .< 1. ALL CONCRETE WMQRK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TH Ap 1 ^—*^� --- ---- 1 ----� , > u ...: Aq 318 E 30 . i =y k • : ', - +'' ' � : 1 , - AND TNT CIEICIATIUi+I CAST—IN-PLACE CONCRETE. �, • —r--- ��' } ' a )'•.+i ,'J , I : 'ft ' ' ,t,A - ' - . 1.. AEI. METH,. VAQRK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE 141111 THE SPECIFICATION 2• ALL CONCRETE SHILL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRP QT1} QOF ' ` 'i.y F= : " . UNLESS NOTED OTH RWtSE ' 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED, OTHERWISE EQUIPMENT MENT '.: ,,,, . ;, ` ;;. 4- LAYOUT SEE t lo I 4 : '1' .w, . - ' :'. " ' - k , i ' 2. STRUCTURAL TUQING NFL ays SHIU.L CONFORM TO ASTM A500, 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTT11 A '61 GLADE 60. DEFORMED DETAIL 430 :r in • .t. , °” :"' ' ,, , , ,, GRADE A OR A501 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO _ -- '" ASTTU A 1$5 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1 0 /�' 3 UN0 r SPL ICES SHALL BE-CLASS 'B" AND ALL HOOKS � }`�_ ►, ��r p �> ;� ; ���j' s , s ,� " • , , , ' . ' . U. WELDING SHALL BE DONE IN USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING Q DIE �A� � E STANDARD ' (1111) 0 . • ` ^. ^ , _r •ff SHALL CORM TO AISC AMID AWS 01.1. WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHAH @ PROVIDED " CONCRETE PAD 4 GRAVE �+ ' SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINI(dlUM SIZE PER T J2.4 IN THE RISC MANUAL FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHAWN QThIE13 QN DRAWINGS: (WHERE SHOWN CA ST -IN -PEA } r , f ' ; ` A ' ;� . - ?; OF' STEEL. t TRUGt1QN'' 9TH EDITION. f ( CE II MIN ` ' i r . tom" PLANS) '--�- _ OR PRECAST) ' ' `'' 4. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL USE BEARING TYPE GALVANIZED CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH 3 {N. 12 LTYP),0..• NMIF 4X4 W4.0X4.0 ^;�. • ''.,. :•._ AL ANIZED ASTN A325 -. 2 " " DOLTS (3/4" DIA.) AND SHALL HAVE A M INIMUM O F TWO BOLTS UNLESS CONCRETE EXPO T O EARTH OR WEATHER: TO f f ,.' . . 4' (/ ) FR S ,,, HA TCH CVS , : �, NO 0II`#ERWiSE. # AND LARGER 2 IN. } EXIST PAVEMENT ' £ '` ` #5 AND SMALLER & WNC 1 1/2 N. --- � -'- IC OR GRADE �. COMBINATION AL. • 4? • • ' • , ': .r _ a o — 6" UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE A' ;., BE AM CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR COMBINA ON AXI 0 , . NOT AGAINSTTHE GROUND: EARTH OR YWEATHER OR sr �. �� �� ��, d— ►, 1 " CIO HORIZONTAL. AND VERTICAL FORCES INDICATE ON PLANS IF BEAM ►�': � . a a, 4�12 EA WAY IN TABLE OR ON PLANS ' t , REACTION ARE NOT SHOWN, THE MINIMUM VERTICAL DESIGN FORCE \ �• �''- �`- 1;y- - - • ` SHALL BE ONE HALF THE TOTAL UNIFORM LOAD CAPACITY OF THE MEMBER. SLAB ' WALL 3/4 W. 1 -6 4 - 1/2 TROWELED EDGE TYP.' • y ; y , 1 I ?' ; . , ' DEANS AND COLUMNS 1 1/2 IN. - - -- / e • A r 6. NON-STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS FOR HANDRAIL, LADDERS AND STEEL 5a A CHAMFER 3/4" SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE - V" - `� FIN GRADE ! • ;P - GRATING MAY USE 5/8" DIA. GALVANIZED ASTM A 307 BOLTS UNO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4. QR AS INDICATED OTHERWISE. V' �� �� �� ��'�� �` ��' s ' 4 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. COMPACTED SOIL TO MIN 95% MODIFIED, MAX DENSITY r' 6. HOLES TO RECEIVE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHORS SHALL BE 1/8" LARGER IN PER ASTIWA D1557 METHOD D (TO BE VERIFIED WITH }; DIAMETER THAN THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD AND SHALL CONFORM TO SITE SPECIFIC SOIL REPORT) E z 0 < t . ; i� " MFR. RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NOTES; NOTE: "° AVOID CUTTING EXISTING REBAR WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN THE ELEVATED SLAB. 1. FOR CONCRETE NOTES - SEE DETAIL 302. 1. USE GALVANIZED HILTI EXPANSION ANCHORS OR APPROVED 7. INSTALLATION CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER 1 L 2. GRAVEL SHALL BE NATURAL OR CRUSHED GRAVEL EQUAL FOR EQUIPMENT ANCHORAGE. WITH 100 PERCENT PASSING 1 INCH SIEVE. 2. FOR SIZE AND LOCATION OF ANCHORS AND OTHER !� `' MANUFACTURER'S WRITT'E'N RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. 3. IF REQUIRED, LOCATE TRANSFORMER IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENT, SEE EQUIPMENT VENDOR DRAWINGS. 4 • ., 8. FLOAT SURFACE SHALL BE A SMOOTH FINISH. SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ALL WITH LOCAL & NEC REQUIREMENTS. PAD SIZE SHALL BE OBVIOUS DEPRESSIONS. SURFACE SHALL BE LEVEL. TO WITHIN +/- 1 DEGREE. MODIFIED AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMODATE TRANSFORMER. .. ' ' SURFACE FLATNESS SHALL 6E +/ - 1/16 INCH PER YARD. 0 CI IX i =� -, ` a — -- — , :' :; -.''' `. ' : , ; ' � STANDARD STRUCTURAL 30 � STANDARD CONCRETE AND EQUIPMENT PAD /SLAB ON GRADE OUTDOOR PAD FOR MINOR L UIP 4 :t ' , " STEEL NOTES 360 365 O MEN T REINFORCING BAR NOTES NO FROST CONDITION Cr) 0 (11) # 0 AZIMUTH •,8.. w w i • i s „,•. , 2 9/16 7/16 1- 1 EQUAL DISTANCE EQUAL DISTANCE -3 10 1 1/4 .' „t .`t "' . I I MONOPOLE I,. M r:k ' FRONT I Txl/X1 • • : r u P DA ANCHOR aOLT FUTURE ANTENNA Tx0/RXO 11111 NS Mimi 4114111111 12 PLACES) RED/YELLOW • , ',,.` DOWN -TILT BRACKET ..,�, ( TYP. 3) RED /GREEN 11 r fir• ��; ANTENNA a ? � 1 ► X _ / / ��S 1�U8 UP ��'� • 'iIl r d / o�o� g •ooa BOLTED MOUNTING „ z r . • • I I BRACKET 2-25 2 ,_ 6 . T ZO / RZO TYl/RY1 2 1 /2 DIA PIPE MOUNT "' BL EEN WHITE/YELLOW ,, • Ht3Sta TE /YELL OW j F � • OWNR .••.• -. - P 1.4 • • i :co loam h. ,” ••" ''' ' ::'° N N MNIELL 1 8" '�- DOW-TILT � � �� :, AN TENNA o .. J3/16 '° 9 , — g . • BRACKET f c$ O*fl4 c QwM M ilacai. pOwE71 _6 \ 1/2 JUMPER t ., ,, ii GBtNET C, • ` • . J I I T � ATENNA I . , H3.." , ... . _. .. - _ ..♦_ - - - ' �� 4 , - 2' -r _ ill I 4/24/97 8TS RELOCATION k } CCA �w + COAX ACCESS HOLE 1 10r '- + ,r• ; I 1 I 1 — . '. � .- ; • b 2'--45" 4/9/97 REVISED CARL R T I I M I I �" — — — / -�. 24Q AZIMUTH 120 AZ IMUTH LOWER ANTENNA BRACKET 3/31/97 PERM T REVISION 4 ' -k •> 4 I EVISION a • 12 -4 -.I ( �y x _� 3/12/ PERMI SET ik . ' 2 7/8 2 7/8 I N .. i �� ,i�... ' ' M 2 , -2 w I 8 ' T T , a I 1 — A' { V DATE DESCRIPTION i ..] �,'_ , I A //4' r MUST Bt IGTAULD � � MANA4� JM 6ATNEEM t1EE PAN4 F1Q11' F 004 ***# ANTENN AMOUNT JM TYO/RYO DRAM IY , i BLUE/YELLOW TZ1/RZ1 MITE/GREEN TW • • ;' — — -- — - -- 01(0(1:0 BY JM • ANCHOR BOLT PATTERN PLAN DETAIL DETAIL 430 433A —_ 419 FOR MINICELL PCS EQUIP. (3 CABINETS) MINICELL EQUIPMENT / PAD LAYOUT . CO _ LOC ATE MONOPOLE ANTENNA MOUNT ANTENNA MOUNTING CONFIGURATION 436A T___ �' HANDHOLE FRAME A►rdtitectt e($ 60 f , ! * • '°' F � . ASSEMBLY 1 -6 � d I/� /i 1tt1 11JA de‘) E 3S2S 112nd. Alm. Si S. too ' A S I A/ MONOPOLE WALL • ..Y . 1 • } • I 1' NEOPRENE j • , ; GASKET � _ LEFT FRONT REAR (' 3 .` '° ' F' �; 1/2" GALVANIZED BANDING I HANDHOLE ANTENNA MAST / - FASTEN WITH CLAMPS PROVIDED FRAME 4. 1 lir SUPPORT BRA' ET , ANTENNA WITH COAX MOUNTING KIT I 1 PART#'10474 -001 , ;.' MIS - RM -BU COAX MOUNTING BAND I ALUMINUM SHROUD _! �, e 1/ - • l U -BOLT IOW � }: I - PART ' 4745 -001 i. BASE BR=PO(E �s /,�' ^ • (2) CHB -114 COAX SUPPORT BLOCKS 0 GA GA1.V ALUMINUM SHROUD �a7 West E/�/IImL//Z�' � Q/�J�' • ', 3 9/16' }‘ i WELD TO 5950 NE 122nd AVENUE ' �„ h. R , `' S ' tIF IF REQUIRED, PAINT W/ 2 COATS • AI •r ` �� ° ��`'. .. -y-. -- i Q FINISH PER REQUEST) - -- PRAND OREGON 9? ?3P b ) � cr. GROUND COAX (SIZE AND QUANTITY • P ' T 144743 -001 :ASE BRACKET SUPPORT BRACKET ti BUSS BAR I AS REQUIRED) W/ NON 1 2 ER ®4'CpC ( W / -IMBUE A W/ U BOLT " NMI 11111101d ; ' . , . . I , ' ti 24` • BEND 4 4 " * 1: :. - 0 OC TYP UMSTRUT P 1000, 1$ L RApIUS TYP) cu ,� ! P. +� ; • • _ ATTACH SHROUD TO (2) 3/$ DIA EXP BOLTS r WEATHERPROOFING KIT Jai/ A•_ { ' � DIN 7/16' ANTENNA GABLE ANDREW X 221213 ,If 4' 4 oM UNIST WUTj53$A FINISH GRADE ., , .,0' , M FEMALE COVER ASSEMBLY ,� ' ( ( FACE TEK�S TYP �ACH SI .i . uNISTRUT I 0" NDING KIT • Q ' la r , P n w I • CONCRETE s 1 /2 ABLE • DIA COAX :.; PAVERS (OR ALA � r " ... .,' , 1f4' 4 11/16' 3/4' ♦� k 10" M IN BENDING RADIUS I . , I �1 �i --fir . INSULATED GROUNDING P A SPECTRUM ,,. OC MM . ,.. , x , • A . . • . L till d.# tI DI BUSH{N T HREA D • NON M O� � � � : l u l u, � M �� GROUND TO GROUND/ Ep 8777 BURNHA ! • Y . .. , :. • . : • • • . �.:. rs'�;� ► , • .. , .,.., • . # ' . BAR ON POLE OR TOMR std 1 • 0 -1 GEDNEY TYPE HBLG T .:>i ' . • � ,, , t., • ; , `' ° s' ;: • + ,` i , , . . • • � , ' • 9 Q, OREGO f I r ' < • A A ,�• , ,fi { r � -b . ;,1 b , 1 " �• M NISTR T 3 A 'I. I. yy jj4'. :', a;4 ] ' , , r } IN t GI�OU G LNG LON.1ED NUT P 1 �}Q8 r ; {: f �.- • , a 4�'r'r J' ' • . r 1 � - __- _�, - - �' -. _ ,, " `,' t ,k ';,,i'„ o .4 • ' ' , ' 1, t: . ,. :.t • ,A1 I' .N 1Y AICAL A - DIMENSIONS DETAIL ' . : . . / ` - • ' ' ,,�' , , ` ' l APICAL S5s C RACEWAY •r 1997 �i � ;. R!' ' ,st it a. :,} h 4 1 - . ' { ~ �, , „ , , � 708A2 � is _ COAXIAL TRAY FROM L CCA TO C MONOPOLE R Q M E „ 55T . A T R N O W CONCRETE 11 '41: ,, P .`. �:; � r: ETE PAVERS , . ,'�•', ,._ A � :� � � 6�A P A T ,3: 24 A �� f , � {., „ ' A INSTALLATION ON MONOPQLE i G N , , r S N ' , , r : r. :1'.-.1r � 1ik _E t k I > J 99 �(/� W '` . r ,�- r,jt '4'k _ `,, I4, , • .7 ,r , , , ' 'i 4}' .. , :. i 4`•-•,' ' Y ".. - r. , .„ x's f fEZ_. _�_ —_4,'w .,, - -_ _.n, '1. rv. , - - .i .k _ ` r� -. - - -- — - ---- --- r .• — -- . , . j.i., . • „ • ..- • ,, __, „ ,. ___--- . -- • . , • . - ,-,- • . , . . • • . " ; nnA, .,.'.• 'I :i• - ' • , . ,,•,. ,, ,, !1. P.! -,•..-- • . , , . . , ., .. . , 11 ": ' ' ..'.4!' I l 'e ''.:-`' r ?., 4 '''':: 1 '''' ?' - ' ' '' • ., ' , ' - ' . ‘' ' ' - , • - "s "- • "';'' ' i ; . . • . :; i s i ;44. v,P.:7'4 .,: • vi,:Y , •I‘ ., ,,,•; ' .',;.• „ °•, 14.3.. •• .; • " . • ,3 1 . 3 . 3 ,, • , ' , . .., , , . , • 1, ,,.. , ", • ,..; ,, ,, • y :,,e , , 1 5,,,,, , ,- " ,„ • , , .. . ' -,•- , ,1? i J,' • ,i, '', , 7. . • 1, t V • • ;;;43. , 4" .,• , Ify4,„.,,if, ,:: ,... , 1 ' 1. ' . • " •',,, 1" , . , . . .. . . . . 3 . . . . ,. . , • . . . • • ' : ,: '';', ''',. r:Alk,''. 41,tzl,th •',-,.. - . ■ '• ,, . ,- , . '' , . . ... . ,., . . . - . . . . . .- , • . • • `'•••- • •,•••' ' I li: :, if A. ; A • „ • / , - • .• , • • . • . . • C r T; i'';,-•••ii.'4A . - 4 ,• • .. .• . .. . , . • . .. - ' , . • _ . . . . c1;, • - ,;.u. t '•.-10..e/." ",", 1,4 , '.." - . : •• - • , . .. . . . . : ' 1 i, : -, ,•,, ''''',4,1 1 •, • . . . . . ' . .• ' . . . ' • , . ' • . "' . 4 • 1••• 4/ 0• ,,, 44, . • . „i'4 . . 1, . , ,t 1 ,N. ': 3 ''''.'''• ' r. - . i , , ..• .. „,,...' \f^i :,, 4 ., ,.. ' Y.., ! 0'1,:: g °- , .,0, , , t; ..' - - . '' ; • ' ' ' • , , , ,. , ' • , ' .....t, ... , , ,t,„„ , _ . . ,,:..,,,, . 1' , F• • ,.1 , ' .-• , 1,,t..i.,, • , , ... .....' . ,. 1... , • , ' . , . . , . , , . , t.r.• - .44 • •-•3 -` ”' ( ■''. •.' ' "c ''''41` ' • 2 ''.' • .'' ' \:' 1 '' • ' . : .• , . , . .. . . . , ,„ .11, • - -1 1 .,,,,,,-• i....,. , •• ,,...„....,*:4‘t . . :,:i :' vi'l4 .,..:.•'..'', " • • . ' • . • . • ,. , : • '? ne4 •,/, =.., : , .• ,, ;"-4 v„. ,%.4,4 :',, .,- • iv! it ,7 • „: .1 . .. . , : . .. . • „ ...",4, J,'' ' •': -.... .• • .,,'•,.! .:.. • l' '.. ,!. ,, • • , i , . ••,.;`, •'?.„ ed.- '•• .; tr • i '.,1, ....4 Yte1.1•i'' '' •• - • ' . • , • • , • P•rL'''' 4-: ; ' ' 7". *. ; "•.%. ',, -4 ;it .. 1; ':, . , . , .. , ., 61 , .., , . , . • , . . ?''' ' ' ,. • .:?: 4 t • ,'' -4...''•: 4 -, l 'it t4 I :: ,. . , '' , SE DISC. SViTCH . . , , . , . , . if t.,,.. ;•,..• ,,..., ;V: i t -,.. 0 •iti :•'1' - "i .."-Al ' , ' • ..m • ,, , - ze.i. ...:, . W, 4 ,,. ,, ' f ,,„i , ,,,.. • . , • f . • t:i. 'ii , ', •„" "•;,, "I • • t i,. • 45 i ' , '-•••'1',) , :' , ' .1 jr.Ji 1. 4. - , , '..•,r,, , 6,, . ',, .. ! I ,•" #'•'' *! i .6 i f;',::' ' . •• f I: •mhiselai ilLillesoloCK .4,,«.........• '. - ,0":. SEE DETAIL 502E , . . . , , . t , „- , .. ON SHEET ES - . . . 0) 1. ; -;' • - ' — 1 4 • +' , 4'. . • i •, ro- -•-;•, ••. ,, .•}•••" . ,t••., .,••,-. - ?•, ' , • ;•, -,,$ ' : .„ , •,,, , ,•-_, .--:•••, • ' . • .T•t-h:!---', ,...?•' n .? '‘ • „,,, - 1„. •• • , • re?)T:':,..."•••.;'••• . .."'',...• ' - : •, ' n l!' •,..'•'" 0 0 , - ',,,Y•k''''..i', •---,'?•,'? ? - ,,-,- - , ,.;, . , ,... . , . • • " P .1 ri:.d.'•., • , ..- . , ',,./ .; • . . '' . t. ' • ' ' ' ''' • ' : • WM / .1, ''F ,; :' '..• 7 ,,; •; .,....,.. rt. .,,, a . e . . 0 Mani .. I , , .. , ••••••,.., 1. c.... :' * ?--w ri.;:' '14v..,44 0 -''• 'e. 1‘.. ON 1Z .1J . eit - 44 .. - , ,. .4'.''. • •,`NoT. lit' w . 1111111111111111 . . , 7/8' HOLE FOR 3‘14tT II . GA1.V. ILT1 WIK . M . . .. . • 01,3, •,, . . ,`•,...:•-• - ...-, -•', ' f H K II ' • , 1 f .'' ' '• •• • •• 3 •• ' ' $1 AipAr:Rilf , '3/16 1) EQUAL 2 .. wommomos.,............ " COI) . 4 ., • 3 . I a , . 1- ' 3 ' '1, : 1 •"1 ,' ' ''.i 1.. ' • • • • 1••• . • 01) • • lail:'' '• ' • ' , ' " . ' A ■ • ; ,,. ' ''• I . Fr? . ; ... - 110" , , i, , .,,., ••;,,,' •, i' • , ‘ 9 . mom ... . . , . .,.... • • . . #1 5. , I, 1 1/2" C • 1 csj I: • „,„, , 1 C+4 , L2 X 2 X 1/4. , . . :,.:..!, t . . , „, • ,,.;.„...,..-,. . . • (TIP.) •, , . , ' - , , , • , 0) , z A t; . . ... . , ' 1 1 I PLATEJ (T)1 OF 2) 5/81 X 5* X 9* . . . . . , . ' • , . ... '' ,;. :-•'-' ,' .,..`. •• . k • . ( X ' Lo (.5 „... • i,,,,, r , .1 • , , 1,1• , IX . .,',.; , • , . . • • t; ■ . k I, ... 0 CONCRETE PAD k.i,,,.• , • ,‘,.... .. ,,,....,,. . ... \s •• CI SEE DETAIL.365 . . . 0 •44 , i.L' ' ,- . . IX , • . • . : „ , - •. . ' 41111:1C • 4 ., , - •'-, ..,• .' • 1 0 . '''.-',;” ; • . ' • 4 _ __ - __ 11141115° i 2 1 pf. , ' DISCONNECT AND METER PANEL MOUNTING . 2 i .. . . . , . ,A . CONCRETE i) . 111(L) 114{1 C.,:. ilipmp "1 2 2 41 f . , 1.4 . ' , . . i„...1 ...; 4, MC . . ritais 11 24.1 ■,'• Itt ' - • . 12.c` Z f.,-. . • = • , . a , 1 ,.. -, • . , . , 0 „ • COI CI: . • . .' . .,:3: - ',.• • . , . . . 1 .: - D , . ...,*•. „ . • 1.— t.) 'fr ' , , . • . irf .„, .:. • GC Z • .,, . „ L MVP ' , •-•• — C. ..(0c,N. . .,,• • . i.„. • . , „ = •. , ( 1,3,, p . . . ,.... f . ;' ' • ' . , ' . ,..,, ..0, : . ,, ; ,• , , . , , ass 00 , 1 03 , ... ,.,, . ?., . . p .,, ,,, , .,., , . • , , '., .,., • , ,,,, : ' • , ,,,,,,,, ,..,, ' , .., .. : . — , ,. . • ' 7.4 '" ' S', • . if •.!:;•;•.•.z4 ''' :`' .` , ' • ; ': '' ''' . . ,, '. ' • ' ' ' ' • . , • , - • . r 1 t 4 tP. ,. i , • . . • , ', .1 • o . • ' . ..... ,.. k ' • , - . . . ,. '?, 1 - '.:.i .''. .!" ' 1 '•• '—'''' '' . . 1 0 .v;-, .-. ''' zo. , ; . ' -• , . -• •.. . . •';‘ .i. , ',&#-,-,-;•:-, : •' • - •• ' - . . • . , ., , . , , . . . :s ,,,„., ,.' • .,./. • — ''' • , ' ' , . . . 1 ,, . 2. -, e' s ,'. ,'. • - .„., , . . , . , .. , -‘,. ••••• , ;I' ' •• ' , 1 . • 6k 1.; ' , ".''' " • . , - ,7;• -3, ..' , . . 1 i ,,t,••. . ..- .• ,,.,,, . • . • . 4/24/97 BTS RELOCATION , . * •- , , ..0.. , . , . • '' ,. ... , , 41 ',!*. "n. ' .' ,. , ' . ' ... 4/9/97 REVISED CABLE RU , . ' 3/31/97 PERMIT REVISION s, --.. • ,. • , . , ,,. .... .... . . ,, 1` . 4 .' • 3/12/97 PERMIT SET I . * ' r • : ' _.. • ,... , - . ... I . . , I BY • , ■ ' .1 • .70 REV DATE ocsatiPncvs ',,y ' ' j .. . • • • • • , , . , I PROJECT • , : •,,,-'7,•1 "„ ,. , . • . • , . MAGER JM - I • , . '. ''. 1 ) 11 -41 4 • ' . . • • , ' IRCHTECT/ • • , , , . ,. , „ ENGINEER JM , . „...,•, • „ . ', ,' , ,,: i ; ..'- ,,. . • 4.7 ..4 '....- ' ;.' . ' ''' . , 0 ... RAM TW .., I . . , .1 - • 7 . , ,,,, D ., ... • . 3 . . 0; , " - , • ,.. CHECKED BY JM . - . , .. _ . , • . , - • . ,• . ,. •. , . . ... • 1 .,, •,', •' .. _ •, a ,, ....,7, •:,,L.:. : t .1-.;,,, -„, 'r, i:" • 14 --'" ' •-- , , • , ,./ ,,,,,, , .,.• :.. ,,, Architects Mariners A PrAtikirgil sc. #, , .4':' .0 ' , 3625 132n4. Ava S.C. SmIti 100 ' F • , .. 04441A** RA 000011..-13610 (TOO 11*1000 , , , ; r . ;I, t n' • •• 3 , . , . • , ..,'■ ... I 4' ' • :r - 4 • • L. '''''' '' - . ,. ll , , : • , ,k(4.7•,. ,,,,, 'r,,-..-, " ,..t. . . 1 1 '3 l • •1r • '';' 4 , ''",-- ' ''' , 1 V. '•';•'', ) .;r1 ; ...,, •,, . 1 • , , . , —. , ' 4 ' 4 '' •• ' , • y 0 2 2' ,, : *. •• •• • ' 2 • I .. '''•• • . °.,3 • •••'41 l ' '• . 3 . • „ ,' ' '„ ‘, . • 4 C • • k 3. '• • •43 .. , .. 3 I, , ., " / • ' • ' , .1 • 3",, ,, t d ' , .: . , , ,, .. I • • . d , , ' , 1' . , . • , ,j l'' ' , t • .4, 1,' , . 3, 4.'''''. :.` ; . . t...i.'t .....'. - , . • - .4e- : i'. :" • . • ' . . i'iv • ,;, .$1' • '• • • '' ' ■ , '41,1 ' ' • ' ' " . ' " „.... ` 1/8 Ws/ C0/17.11/1//A? 01.9 ...• ..., . • • r. i„. , .-,.•,-,, .,.. . 5950 NC 122nd AVENUE' ' 1 ' '.,:'.,:l.'-'•••• 1!'• • • ,•., ..:,,, # SUITE 221 r• , , .., ' , •t• r , • 3 . ': • .1 & • • •" "•, '', !.. • . • 1 A 2 , ■ ' . i v PORTIANO, OREGON 91230 , , . , , , ,. ,k.'...-'•••,.7 ., • ,:. .. : ' . • , . . - . , . .., , 1 i • . , • ' . A • ' • ' , • • , : . ,'.' , , I - , ' • - , .', 1 ...`,!•.: M''' • '.0 . !.° ' . . . ,. . O '')' i ' • • : 4141 . • 1 . • tI, ' ' i.• ..., -,,!—. r , - * , . , . . • • , .1 ‘"•.- ' ' ' • jay A. . - r - is" e i , - - , • -..1 ...,•:-, ;'.. ..t,.? ..i'f. , . * 11 ''' '' ' - " ' ' 1 ' 111 . . , ' c ' ' ' ; . '; • 1 • , ' 1 i ' + . '' .; . . r . W 4 .. 4 . 1f0 , . . I , .1.:'. , 1 ' ,,.,'' 7 ' '', ..... ''. • • , .-• f .04 .:,,pt , ;43 i't" / ' ■.: '' - . ".,.1:,, • • • . . • iA Ilr '''44 j''' - • •-' • :• i 4,:i .'4 ■ :"','.• • o ' , 1 • - • 4 ik, , • ' . k' r ' • •'''' , '• ',1", "",'' '' • '• • .0 •-, , ,;:,,/,. .. . . „ , .' a ' )01 '". '..„ : . : ' ; '. - -: i l , . ' , , rl,:,.44i l'..V I ' .-, ". . , POR-075A . . ..., • $PRINT SPECTRUM i t.... , fr'?' -,,,•'.? .''' ',7%; ' •2 : ',.. ; ,, 3 ,''' • . ' ; • • . i 3,••• '''" A ' ,3 ' e .." i.,„I 1. 1 . ,. ' .; • 1 , ,.-, i• * 8777 BURNHAM - f ., , : ' , 4 , • 1,, ,'' . :"• : .." ii k , . , ,, ( , 9 .4'1 '.4 ''q''•• ••:: .,,.; ..`'.' 1 ' . .- • . - . - .. . - — 4. • .' .-- ' f•-• f ;,•••:;,•• ,,,..1.,"1:', • . ' . . • .. . . , , - • .. :',", .. . . • . 7 -., ,.., tk 1' , ' , 1„ ;. " • " ' . )' TIGARD, OREGON ■ . , , . , 97223 , , - - .. * ,1 . , . .., ,. _. ,.,. ,....- ., . . .. . . , f - • , •.,.".:t,', 0 1 ,4 ..- ,i , ,,- „. -.. ,...",- -:' . . . . . •OsAveig se.s . , . .. ' •., ! ' ,-; -'t - No • ' . -, ‘ ..,• q 1 ,: - '• , 1 : , .: .,,,,, : .,' ,. . ,- ' . . 0:• i, ' i:,,,' •,,, ; : 4. ,-,....„,'''.., '.- • . • . , . . . . •• , . . . • .• l' .c.T..'4.; et% . ,•..., .. 4, .., ' . , . --,.. , , ,t.•• .. •• •,. ,,,,,,, ,.,,,,. . DETAILS .: ,.‘..: '„:" . , 1 ' t; f ...., .,,,, ...•. „ I.,. t.:-. r.)... 4 .,.. 6,7 t N, . A. ' 1 : ' . ' • . . „t': :, n4 firi 4.4 ": .;;; • ...: 4 V i■ .!; ' ',' l c .. ,; , '', „ " ' , . ' 4.:1 4;5). .14■• ..• ,...., :•,31,,r,,,} • ;:. ',. V, ',1.: ',If , .' - . . a . ' . .k . n . ' ,' : ' '-' . . - ' ' : n1 i.. '"11 H '.4 :' 1 .. ' . '' '' . 1 v ,v 4•,--si.j .,- • , ... . , , $ "F.., v•.• .4. ,,,, . -,, ,„.• , ,„ •,‘ 1, . . ' . , , • • • ••• 1 '1 1, '• • •• ,• • ,A. 3 : 3 ".'.' .. '",' I': ) :i . ,3if 31: ,, . ' • s . • • IA 1• 4 .,/ ›. 'ON' '4‘.:'.."...' r -••,,•! „ • • . • • 1,* f" i • • li ' •'' 1 1.q : , pi' ,,:,': ., 7O 8A 3 . , 1 3 :, 28 24 Ahr 19 ,,?rt ?: 1 i . 20 ,,' , ...r."1. , i 3•'. •3 . ' 3P1,•; i •••• • • • OM MOM • ' ' ! 4 •i'11 ' ••' „I' , '4C,, A • ,, : .' ' ., .4 , . , • . .. ./ , - '4. . S2 '- ; - l'' • %, ' . r ' ., ' • . . x .. ' 97.708, ' 4, ,!1,..1,,,,,(.,,,„ ,.. ..,‘.,r . ••,. 1 $ , , , . , . Ait : , ,; . .t,i' i.,•g-p. - ! ),,,, „,;,,,,, ... Iv... ,•, ,• i ' ,, . • • • ,,, • . , ,, ..,'. if,',• ." 11 • ; •. t"V! . '''' ,, 'j4'' ' i', ., . ,.A : .? 1 ;' , , . ." , . . . . k., 4.4• , .:kf,...• --. -',•••• •,,.qi • . , . . 1: 1"' • • '61 ,‘ '..I • , • - • , . .. ,... ,, • . _,. - .. . . ..••• • • , . . - ' . ' • .... ., . - 4-.-...... • ...- • ' - • - ' ,- , ,. •. ...... ... , . ' '''. ' • - .-: • , ,.„, v ,,.., ,, .-g: •::„ 1, ',., r r 0.,,..',':,.. '...Y,',,,•; l'i. • -•. ts . • . • ' , ' .' . . . . . . , . , ".. I. . • 4. ' . - . i. '.',(4 ' riy.'i4).. , ,,,*,,,'`,;7.5-' iNi.'1•A • , • • 1 - .• 1 , , . . , • . • ' . e qriliti , .',• .i, -, ' f 0 . , , , ,,: : ''.. , :-,.. ' :. • , . • . .. 4i•Vi 4 k ,.,..t , .. ; . , . r3, „ ,„„, . . . , - - ■ 1 1 r 4 , 0 ■ MIN "` ANTENNA NO. COAX COAX REQ'D SIZE LENGTH qi , ALPHA 2 1 -1/4' 115' BETA 2 1 -1/4' 115' ■ GAMMA 2 - 115' 1 1/4 115 N tNI GPS 1 1/2' 53' = Pia. CD z CQAX CABLE LENGTH -I- SIZES ® o I mm E �. ca 0 Li. . o (4) -.I - ® { 1 fa v CD 2 I .... Co m r , 1 0 < ri. urt) . .4 i X , i CC I i Fa- ca Cr) z 0 gx a s NI r CO ' I { • 4/24/97 BTS RELOCATION EXIST, 25KVA< *> POLE MOUNTED UTILITY EXIST CAP OF 4/14/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS 25KW TRANSFORMER UTIL TRANS 4/1/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS EXIST. POWER POLE EXIST LOAD ON 5KW 3/12/97 PERMIT SET • PROVIDE SQUARE D OR EQUIVALENT, COMBINATION UTIL TRANS 3/3/97 ZONING REVISIONS OR • METAL METER BASE /MAIN DISCONNECT BOX. W NEMA 3R. 125A CONTINUOUS DUTY 4 TERMINAL, NEW LOAD 14,9KW 2/28/97 ZONING SET 1 AVAIL S.C. = 7428 AMPS WITH UNDERGROUND SERVICE ENTRANCE AND REV DATE DE9(IPTION ' AT WEATHER HEAD SEPARATE RACEWAYS FOR UTILITY AND NEV TOTAL 19,9KW _ 1 EQUIPMENT CONDUCTORS. LOAD ►Awe JM NEW SPARE y JRB — NEV WEATHER HEAD CAPACITY 5,1KW a n CCR DAN . PROVIDE 100A, 2P FUSED SWITCH WITH , CH or J RB 100A FUSES, 3/11/97 AVAIL S.C. = 6805 AMPS AT SWITCH 12O/24OV, 10 PANELBOARD WITH Architects s a GROUND TO — © POWER CABINET 100A, 2P BREAKER : a . 24. Ava ILL ENCLOSURE CONCRETE I PROVIDED WITH EQUIPMENT _ PAD 100A ' LOAD SUMMARY A R s N.g. �— - 3 #2 CU. + #8 GRND 2'RMC 2P i / 1i► %, 03X206 )733-6051 GROUND LEVEL AVAIL S.C. = 6520 AMPS AT CB 3 -4/0 AL„ W / #4 GND, THWN, IN 3'PVC 3 #2 CU. + #8 GRND, THWN, IN 2'PVC. 1 <SIZE SPECIFIED BY PGE) S S () PROVIDE TRENCHING AND BACKFILL, US !West C®/1J/I'U!I/CAt/:o/IS 5950 N£ 122nd MIME SUM 221 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 3/PVC CONDUIT UNDERGROUND PORTLAND, OREGON 97230 #6 CODE GND TO BTS UP TO 12' ABOVE GRADE AT THE POLE, PGE PROVIDES ALL 1 GND RING, CONDUIT BETWEEN THIS POINT & TRANSFORMER, IN ADDITION, UTYILITY CO. & CONTACT #1 PGE WILL PULL ALL UTILITY PROVIDED 1 PGE - JIM BRENNEKKE (543)590 -2153 CONDUCTORS BETWEEN TRANSFORMER AND METER BASE, PARTIAL RISER DIAGRAM . T POR -0 / 7 5A SPRINT SPECTRUM 8777 BURNHAM TIGARD, OREGON --- j' . - 97223 -. ,'-\ `''~- ~ *"..., A Mall IlLE map NO f ■ L . POWER RISER i, i''t4- ..j -. PLAN Li .. ,,_` , ,;, ,r, 1 f . , y , liDIMI 001D41, 1I Mar 1991 r�, y' I . 07.708 ,,. .•�n • +lo. < 04-25-1997 1 , . 4� • .• ,t aF . L w� • }`" j � ,� ','. . i p ,. , tr 1= ' i �• ' �' ♦ ) / ' ' • • ,,- • CO • . , ' , , 0 i - T •; ,, :ji; ' -- _ . _ Al (111) 1 { ' I x - ' X � J � co F `--.__,... Tl . •/ ` • N • ,- _;. C�T1NVfi 3ELOW; IGHT = ISN • ,. • , -- i %', {, . • . 0 0 / z .. ... . / v, , i i o, , : 0 0 , w .. 1 :`, • • // • 0 cc :. . / ' nine (a5 ;. , 10.5 "X17.25" HANDHOLE / - , y BROOKS 36PBC -1 W /CAST IRON COVER (TYP.) / p , ''' - . < QC . 4:1) F.... 2 "� / W / Os 0 / , CZ Z • 01) 0 E N • M as • / :,.,;r 0) • / EXIST. POE POWER POUF ' _ ( . °, / .r • 2 " PVC FOR TELCO IN TRENCH. 326 • , E4 -- .,/ • / ,+' / 4/24/97 BTS RELOCA11ON 4 • t , / b . U / CONTRACTOR SI-IALL INSTALL 3'PVC CONDUIT UNDERGROUND .- uP TO POE PWR POLE. POE WILL PULL AU. UTILITY PROVIDED-• 4/14/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS i : - CONDUCTORS BETWEEN TRANSFORMER AND METER BASE. ,, / / 4/1/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS / ` . / / 3/12/97 PERMIT SET • j / N 3 4 "' . 4/0A1...,T1 - 104,WSVNC #,, / / • yy / qrp IN 44 4 3/3/97 ZONING REVISIONS ti' / _ -. / 2/29/97 ZONING SET 9`, \ / / REM DATE D IPTION - ' / MOWER JM • • I �'•`� . / ! METER DI�1v $1�ATC�N/ � • / . s MODER JRB .� , GATE ' ...• ';, / F 1E140 �0 IN 1RENCI.1. 4 \\ 0440 IN TRENCH O A* 9Y CCR 1 ��7 \\ / •rpvc 4 WAS 4 GATT <' / '� n JRB 3(11 /97 ` / _ _ /'' :� • f' • , / ,�\ � �. , / r � ,/ .- CU., TiiMIEi, W L f6�V • 0 •. . _ -_ CON INtIEp I , T_ / ' . Architects P nn s n *wpm*" _,;F • , l >. -- - - - _ _-- , / MO S3 bd. Ma S E. 100 ,,,, , •. \ \ \ / .. �A •000hW00 ( �1 -4000 , , ;,,, . , . . , ,. s• . 1 = 4 1k ,• :. Y O TIGHT FLEX 11155 it1TN AVE. N,E. ®E4 SUITE !00 • KYRKLAli9, YA, f003S r • :- ` • \ j �` (06)739441 }:.;: , � EXIS GTE U.Q. VAULT as West Com//7uD/ca /le/7S \ - 5950 NE 122nd I�E . SUITE 221 PORTLAND, wow 972.30 \- 1 • • '' .`1 , • . 1. i • POR -075A 0 SPRINT SPECTRUM • • 8777 BURNHAM ....q } TIGARD, OREGON I • NORTH . 97223 . . ,'.,/,---. ORAlIi10 II,E OMO1�0 HD :.. . , � . POWER COMMUNICAT1ONS {' 1. , , ..•, . , ,. ,, . v PLAN 4 • • . , • <�' 11 Oi II Mar 199'1 ' , • • . a 04-25- 1997 • f ry , ` 1 .'44 f .. ' �. j ' ; ,. i � i - .. ■ Os f " r♦' nt , � j . 6 ! , 0 fit , i • . yr . s 't I x. , . ®/ • • 0 1 qq 1 i ..` , . ; • ' , : ::, ' . 011) 1 C —.- „ ,, __ • E 644 , , E . z i „ . ..... .... , . - .•,... . , .., ., . ; . .„ . .. ..•,,, , . , ,.,. 1r , : , ;'; � ' o Lu • ..... . i. . v 0 ' _ FENCE GROUNDING (TYP.) 502 • 0 • E4 , ® r i _ V -- METER &DISC. SWITCH G ROUND ROD W ACCESS, 506 0 + { '' E4 V (°,� . BY OTHERS . • CO M "� (FUTURE) ` 1 010 Z . / .. \ ' . GROUND BAR FOR , . , ,. COAX GROUNDS F- 1 • `. � r + • • \ \ , 509 • ,°� Ia 2 AWG, TINNED BCW ' \ _ E5 E4 E4 j i RING GROUND) / �. GROUND ' ' :: ' ' , • . , BAR FOR 524B 509 I ',, - -� .._ _ _____ __ - - 6 D - _GROUND ROD (TYP• "�'" .,- %� ,'. CABINET GROUNDS ONLY 5 4 • O''''.. 4/24/97 ' l 4 r B T S R ,,;' \ 4/15/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS .. ` 4/1/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS 3/12/97 PERMIT SET II 3/3/97 ZONING REVISIONS R 1,, • • 2/28/97 ZONING SET 1 • 1 " , e 1. A REV DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT I 1 . '''' JM !.. , % 561 TO EXISTING MONOPOLE RING GROUND i A11 ,!a . E5 MOWER JRB , s . , _ n oy►�c 4.V 3 3 DRAM n CCR 1 � 7 `j _ 3/11/97 • • `" /i • ` .E.E4 Architects Plane Woe ( , ',. 526 ONO' POLE GROUNDING Oppondoi MU 132sL Ma LI 0b 100 ' . E4 1 5 p�1 e+4- , E��; G 5 INSTALL "°' ' O00 �r LIGHTNING I • .; r ± y r \ PROTECTION E4 ENGINEERS ER11 ME, N, 1 fitl0 t! E. K 9l03t . ,s (206)739 - 6DS1 11 ' # 7r "' 1 • • J � r , ' ti\ • I I f U$ West COM/1muD/cofiogs 5950 NE 122nd AVENUE , , ', ;" RATE 221 1 icy PORTLAND, OREGON 97230 + � .. �. � / i ! aa, ' • ' a, ! ' ' , ' i I ii V . NORTH a • f : ., , _ y • . \,, . �I SPRINT SPECTRUM "., }.1 8777 BURNHAM : , TIGARD, OREGON - : ''� r 97223 • ' ,, , DRAWS T CRAWS NO i' _�y �'^ .� GROUNDING PLAN • 1.37...... 3 • Iv _: . 1� '� ra �.. . I i ; .r �'y . \� r � ff�! ff l' ��A m II I ar Nl14tT OMR `! 97-708 F i 04 -25 -1997: • , , ri • , r ; � • ,lam f r '< •• • , -.._ __ ...•. .- -... ., is _ .,, .. -. - .. . ® •® t, i > . , °4343 "Mg ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS s 3 .T so cTOR FOR ',r. ' GROUND ROD vim " ' • 2 FIDUBLE .;•. GROUND ROD 0 i y ,. <WTIQHT CONDUCT CADVELD TYPE CONNECTION 1 ',' RAIS HOUSEKEEPING PAD . COMPRESSION TYPE t�TIf1 1 ; FINISHED GRADE, AC PAVI �1 . e.- .._._.. G " T D' WIRE ; ;': MATCH SLR AND TNICKNE BU RNDY *� ' OF EXISTING RGS • OgN DUtT TYPE KSU6 AW BCW rx SLAB ON GRADE OONN C TO BELOW 501 REPRESENTS DETAIL NUIGER SERVIT - 1 ' TREN t x (5 PLACES) % .. y' v • • : ll ► 2. 1,► 4 4oA ABBREVIATIONS . : .:. :• :.: � ; :•• • . .., r i • ! ` ♦ • - .% ♦ • ♦ ♦+ , ..... ► .,.,. . .. ►... BCV BARE COPPER VIRE (S AvG AMERICAN VIDE GA IMGE . . +� • .. • ..♦. , r . +.1.. .+♦.. . OPAID TINNED) `•�•��� •, � � ' � • ICU 1 GPS =STATIONARY PO SIT IONING SYSTEM 1 ��',_. J'.� CABLE TO PIPE • ' ' i;,ii�!r0110 „� UN DISTU RBED Pcs PERS +L CATION SERVICE ' C ONNECTOR 0 1 M i 1 1 1 ; 7 i i t 1 . •r, A •Ji�1 { ihi .���• POWER IIIMM CI F,, ZI 1116 COMPACTED BAC ILL • - . , � PPC PovER PROTECTION caw #2 AWG BCW BURNDY TYPE GAR - -" i , 4411 II '', II ."'° PER SP ECIF IC A T I O N 0 b WOO PRE PRIMARY RADIO CABINET , , , , , , NE TY ����` �� �� � FL,CU8I,E P. TYPICAL ? ;; , l! 2• TORK Y RACEVAY _ BACKIRAOSED HOUS EI CEEPiNC PAD RGS RIGI GALVANIZED STEEL �� .y..� . � j � j � j 2 AWG BCW �� ' ' * , l( l it. • , (SA OR NATIVE SOIL) NG _ i EMTCTRICAL METALLIC T1dING DVG DRAVING r.— . . — — EARTHVCRK N Saar r \ - , T ` � ,� �" ��.� �� SPE CIFICATION IGR INTERIM GROUND RING wisp �-- .__ ...r.....r .. "®1 ' ! . ,,,, • TELEPHONE CONDUIT � 2 " RGS CONDUIT ACCA ANTI CABLE COVER ASSEMBLY CABLE TO CABLE 0 0 f ., t • E TO BELOW UTILITY WARNING TAPE SUwB ON GRADE BT BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM C ADWELD raw � 1' FROM CONDUIT GR M OC EDGE TO EDGE Bscv BARE STRANDED COPPER VIRE 0 . ' = ELECTRICAL CONDUIT IS INSULATED STRANDED cW'P VIDE • 0 , o 1 POWER CABINET CONNECTION 4 , 4409 ■ . "TS "�® 1 0 ; L �,a.. t ' ' 0 6164 r .• , , ,,MINT SERVICE TRENCH BURIED CONDUIT Ti /POWER CABINET CONNECTION LEGEND I `''' 326. ELECT /TELEPHONE 440 500 502 GRO — STANDARD DETAIL FENCE GROUNDING cn , . < log - . CABLE GROUND KIT (.) 4 4 #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND GROUND ROD BOX REINFORCED CONCRETE d�. LOOP AS LARGE AS f 8 1/2 ' ID CHRISTY COVER CHRISTY F8D WIRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) _ •• ' . (S TANDARD ANDREW GROUNDING KIT) , GRADE TYPE F22 Q © 1 y -- ' f GRADE POSSIBLE TO AVOID �C Cf) CZ Z I • h'!W /' SHARP BEND � , 134G I E*1 • r; _ ANTENNA CABLE • C 0 X 16 n ., t t CADWELD � ''" ' r�r,, , __..� ---- 0 0 .1 ''' ` • CABLE TO ROD o • o p 1/2' DIA. 3 3/4 .: 6' , • o / "` Q MAX. Ai . �. .. _„_ .. ---� CONNECTOR o o 0 0 0 o MA X I2' APPROX. BURNDY TYPE GA �� 0 4 0 o INSIDE WALL , 2' -6' MIN. 0 o o OF BUILDING T YP ICAL CONNECTION, OF CABLE GROUND KIT REINFORCED ;, � 0 0 �. CONCRETE EXTENSION "' 6 RING GROUND , C 1- 34 TO ANTENNA GPS CABLE END Iv . •, I�RISTY TYPE ADS on • 'i AWG BCW t —7.-..1 Y - 4/24/97 BTS RELOCATION , CABLE GROUND KIT "' . ; *� `• ;� Rr , . /15/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS CLEAN SAND FILL #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND H LE CONFIGURATION 4 •'`, WIRE ( GRO UNDED TO GROUND BAR) ' (' 4/1/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS .- • ( STANDARD ANDREW GROUNDING KIT ) T LEGEND= 3/12/97 PERMIT SET RING GROUND 1 . 2; G BCW 1- COPPER GROUND BAR 1/4' X 4'X20 ; HOLE CENTERS TO MATCH I� i 3/3/97 ZONING REVISIONS 1 ' • � GROUND ROD COPPERWELD 5/8 ' DIA X 8' -0' LONG ANTENNA o a . NEMA DOUBLE LUG CONFIGURATION CABLE 7/8 'DIA, '- ' 2/28/97 ZONING SET w = GROUND ROD COPPERWELD 2- INSULATORS MAX. 6 i ' 5/@ ' DIA X 8' -0' LONG 3- 5 /8' LOCKWASHERS 1 4- WALL MOUNTING BRACKET INSIDE WALL RE DATE DESORPTION ` . 12' APPR, .1 WOMM OF BUILDING �- JM 5- 5/8 -11 X 1' H.H,C.S.BOLTS • NOTE' DO NOT INSTALL. CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND JRB • ,,,. , ... , ..___. , _ • t GR OU NDING — STANDARD DETAIL GROUNDING — STANDARD DETAIL GROUNDING .STANDARD DETAIL TYPICAL CDNNECTI N DF CABLE GROUND � � ` B 3/11/97 593' 506 D D D KiT X0 , GROUND ROD GROUND ROD WITH ACCESS GROUND BAR DETAIL TO ANTENNA CABLE END , CONNECTION TO Architects Planners * arraos Gvep®rethe FROM GPS ANTENNA 0 ROD 2 ' #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND LIGHTNING ROD � + w R � MN* 2" GROMMETED ,, GP (CITY 1) _ __ _ __T• ____ — T____. _•� ;_ 1 WIRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND BAR) H OLE IN COYER (STANDARD ANDREW GROUNDING KIT) COVER FROM ANTENNA GPS ANTENNA CA (TYP.) 11 Morn � ' t]1II AN 1 s u , Kt , 1 , PVC OR 2 0 I I G (206739 -host • 1 / BCW L ANTENNA I - T CABL - ! o � 3/4" DIA. JUMPER 1/2 (TY CABLE i• � COVER FROM ANTENNA ANTENNA CABLE FLEXIBLE PVC '� , ' t �t1� I ASSEMBLY �, j • � ` �� c (QTY 6) UGHTNINfi BCW , //� 1/2' DIA, / FROM A NTENNA GROUND BAR _ _ (ANTENNA , , MAX. 6 MOUNT BONDED LIGHTING ROD CONDUCTOR I I ,_ EISEVNA "� A SCW FOR MONOPOLE CABLE CTYPJ A ‘ TO MONOPOLE I4 APPROX. Ai I/ • F INSIDE WAL as 6rosf Commaecot/ons ' OF BUILDING �••�■ CAB 5950 NE 122nd AVENUE TY PICAL CONNECTION OF CABLE GROUND KIT IB — ' 3 4 DIA. n SyJ /lE ??1 ' = ' � PQRFLAND, AREGY�YV 97230 ! TO CAR LE FOR AN TENNA GPS CABLE AT EQUIPMENT , AND MONOPOLE 4 I , , PVC _ CONNECTOR . I II ' r TO CABLE TR ! 1 ` I E GOLD SHRINK 116 AWG I ASSEMBLY COVER #6 AWG STRANDED COPPER GROUND WEATHERPRQOF'ING KIT CTYPJ 1 I . STRAN • WIRE (GROUNDED TO GROUND BA) J 1 = 1 l j + b b b i 2/0 CONDUCTOR ; M ONOPOLE R • T ER (S ANDREW GROUNDINGi KIT) ra 1i 11 2 CONDO R FOUNDATION n . GROUND D KI BCW CABLE N KIT � T � �' 0 1 ( 4P j DOUBLE HOLE . I •Y. ,, • CONNECTORS TYPJ • ' ... • 1 ...... t .. RING GROUND p�NTENNA '�" .. , �2 AWG TINNED : _ \ ° ' � 'I ,. N � ! • , RING GROUND Tr , + • � - 7/8 DIa. - �; �2 AWG BCW ,.' t • � _ . _ SPRINT rE o CTRU M MAX► `vo ., 0 /� / ; / ✓ // /,/i GROUNDING BAR T o TRANSITION J : ` ' 8777 BN HAM $. • ' �: ,�• V r ; t ,l • -,•• GR BAR AT BASE OF HDLE r �Y� �; , TYP•) 97 REGON . or �T L cE, CABLE _ ) )hi,,fealii,-Aff 223 • � T d ' v. ;• .i ■ DRAW{ >. woo NO ; . ' , COTES DO 1T INSTALL CABLE GROUND KIT AT A BEND AWG BCW ;;. „ .. .;' GND ROD TO RJNG GROUND `�.; ; .- .� ; „a� li f . ' _, �.�. �- DETAILS E_A% ” P� af { J � . . - � '.,, , ,4,:', # : { ;:� ' . 4 4t ' , f A.0 . Ca NNFCTIIJ N OF C•AB4E GROUND , KIT GROUNDING — STANDARD DETAIL o� II ISM QI(,, GROUNDING - - ST ANDARD DE TAIL GROUNDIN STANDARD DETAIL - , Mar I It ' ` : ANTENNA art EC U R M N ' D 5 MONOPOLE LIGHTNING PROTECTION N CONNECTI ]N OF' CaROUNDIN WIRES T❑ NSIT ON GROUND BAR (LOCATED lt ,,1 {,;` ,;. ' ; ; . . . '' r' � . , .',. S GROUNDING PLAT BASE A AT OF MONOPOLE) r B D E �. b. . : t. , � . • : % s • i � . { r 4 1 .. . r - � ,.,, . a ; f � , , 1 t�• � ., � '• . � 5 - 1997 [1,10;437,4444 .,•.+St.r,• , . . , t , r ; t, : a • .r YY ,, • „ .: y s ^ �? .', 1. , , 04 2 • ' ; . , .... . . wr,. ., z..ti • . . , 4 . . :1 i, ➢ • 7 ' +, J F , , ; , ' v ,a I s - • _ : 't.•,. r ' { R 1. � 4' ----Gps = s . , , , e '..1%, . , ,, :, , . GPS ANTENNA " "t r` ',1' "" ' i M : „.,N,„,..,., 4 ,' •; •,' P '�.re�!- CI S ANTENNA t' , �;, ,. << �,�,,a... -. F ' �]hl ANT A CW WO HOLE LUG � ' � , ,' ' , F , . ;-, ,-' :Y , l - , (QTY 1) CS CABINETS I :. ;:,_v ANTENNA nt - a '� � GPS ANT TO A�fG B 1 -.m '' ' . ; , • ' (QT 6, 2 /GAB,) 1 eM� • ' k r - • , i ;' � � CA <TYP.) � �. _ i a y r V T A % �. .� -! II 1 1/4' RGS CONDUIT ., '�` - A,N E � (QTY 6 ti � V,/ 3 1: 1 . , i , .. )0 ANTENNA C AI .! evG /,. , CABLE (T ) . ` CABLE � ` i. t:IECImN r J AV6 Damon sod Ri�iT v , I;j' , T , COV ( - I.-- SUPPORT DETAIL 561 0 s; ., : , ' .' ASSEMBLY , I I � � C + �i onewa JUMPER iitt r vo i+0LE LU C ABLE (TYPJ 1/2 ' DIA COAX CARL .. � E R ( OR EQl1AL) ri'� HOLE 5' MI B ENDING RADIUS V' • v I j , � • 0 ' �� .' :::: ac > :. c >iat ffcl t ' 1 �arr a F Ne �+ a �a I ASSEMB y �'� I to n t I OliliveOli IN is $(L M 01) ,fir .., , , !! �k2 AWG BCW��� I ( , E #2 A WG BC W Y _ ® ® {w I TO RING GROUND TO RING G ROUND ,, � „� �, �, ,_.,. , 0 2 AWG BCW TOE / c., ..... '' t,' . *2 AW G BCW TO RING GROUND AVG 11 TO COST. RING GROUND ti , RING GROUND e o , i; . 0 i ' GROUNDING — STANDARD DETAIL GROUNDING — STANDARD DETAIL STA NDARD DETAIL_ p • GROUNDING STANDARD DETAIL 526 ANTENNA CABLE GROUNDING TO 561 '* ,,.,, GPJD BAR MOUNTED AT CABLE COV ASSEMBLY GPS ANTENNA INSTALLATIO � CO • . GND BAR MOUNTED AT CABLE COVER ASSEMBLY 11” t. , EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR '. GROUND BAR AND MONOPOLE GROUNDING * PLATE Color code the coaxial cables with colored heat shrink tubing as descrided below'. The actual color coding wilt take place a the In 0 1 4 FUSE DISC. SWITCH p� /q� t C 0 0 0 0 0 cable is laid out and the connectors are Installed. As part of the NE 4 1 PE PHASE iS A s' n ".�.i. � ■•r�..r.. - - � al a "St coax return loss measurements, this effectively 'rings ou$' which gas Z NEMA TY ' ; , 0 0 0 0 able Is which. So the color coding will occur during the return loss ° measurements on the coax. , ' Y ' ., moo r ;• : The color coding Is as follows' ' CAD Ix z If; TER 0 > '' s > /gc °� • ° To Identify the sector• 01 {' NEMA 3R /� TYPE - 'm-. -- X a RE 0 D or True North . �� 41111111111111111Y11 �� . 11 xi 0 Y = WHITE 120 Degrees or . I ': , ° 0 0 o o 0 0 Z s BLUE 240 Degrees or W.S.W * o !_____.-----t—_-------- 0 0.1 To Identify the port. N. If.;.- , eVi 8 TYP� 0 ■ GREEN 4/24/87 . sTs RELOCATION . t _ ' -' 4/16/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS s ' 1 s YELLOW '1; � � 4/1/97 PERMIT SET REVISIONS i So , each coax will have two stripes on each end of the cables. These ii stripes sho uld be app roximately 2 inches long. � � .. 3/12/97 PERMIT SET r 1 F i r . 1 For the end of the coax that goes to the antenna attach the 3/3/97 ZONING REVISIONS `:'' . I I • �1; �'`: , , I v I I , I stripes near the antenna as possible, ensuring that they won't get I O Q I I Q I I i 2/28/97 ZONING SET F Wt.: : ,�.w. • � T10 /RZ4 TZ1/RZt� �'iY0/R1�D 1Y1/ RR1ft � [xo TXt/'RX1 J covered up by the weather - proofing and can be setn frori t g round , • REV GATE DESCRIPTION 240rAZ 120rAZ O�AZ cr ' GFS ! T COAX MANAMA 1 C AST/ JRB I JM i ' • • DRAWN BY CCR 1 11 7 I=ii a +ec n JRB 3/11 7 , , — STANDARD DETAIL DETAIL � # , ' • RACEWAY 5 9 C ®LOR CODING ®F COAX CABLES ' 4 , { DISCONNECT AND METER PANEL MOUNTING Architect; Planes A 1 ( `r °, 31135 13 Art at WO 100 ! ; = : WA 10001.1• (S 044.4000 f •; R StlIYt t00 1 Y 1E1'vs 0T14 AV(. N.C. j t - ' A E KU00./ND, NA. 98033 (206)739 -6051 ;f;; ' • / West Co IU /lesfl017s IT 5950 I ', re ti,.. A VE1VU£ ,1 ,. .1- ,c,:, POIRlL4N0, AR£OAN 97230 '' t: '' a � �'' W ` PQR -0159 I r ' z SPR RUM / 1 �, 8 777 INT BURNHAIA SPECT � � � i /f p 722 y � 3 � � v P t.� DRAWS 6 NO I� j.•F.'1,."''t' , 'N ' d p i ' '# ' i g , ;f.� l DETAILS' •y 4 ■ `�t YS - ,,.. yr y , r Dog a f a ,K ss I wi 0.1 ' 'w �ii� 1 �+`,- ^ i ' 4 +, .i. • ` •� X91 ■ " n . to , , . g !'.•' , . F ■ • r - , 1 • •y '�. v. it ,. .., t - .[. ,, , t. t r , , - �1 _._ .9 .1,.t , -- _ --,%,- - IP .- - Z .A, S - 4 •• . . • ,, „ , , , ' 9 , , .. 9-' -A 9 s ' - ' 7, ' , ,,' ,9' - ' -- ' - "f 1 .-T'''' '-',- ,.= .,' . * , . ',. , - ,, ';',„" • =,,,,,.- '' 4 ' . , c.' ° ,4, , ,'.' ,, . ; . , , ... EHIBI 1b * , , - ' - , ,s. -- r', .. ',- - °.-,... .`" , , *,.. - :. , * ' f: ' - , . , , ,. , , „. ._ ,... „ , ABBREVIATIONS '8t: SYMBOLS , H . , . ., . , . ,,,..;.:._-.:: .-, ,- --,,,,, -:',...,-,-, : --, I', .. PCS ‘COlviMUNiCAtIONS , . • . .. _ , . . . .. . . , . - - . „ • . , , . , ,. ... .. . , , , ACD ACCESS DOOR MECH ADJUSTABLE . MECHANICAL DETAIL NUMBER ' .., . _ , : ADJ . MFR. MANUFACTURER , J-. - ' ' ' ' . , ,. ' - - ' 7 770 SW MOHAWK, BM f , , - ,, ALUM. ALUMINUM MIN. MINIMUM _ ArAlt GENERAL CROSS , _ - APPROX. APPROXIMATE MTL. METAL . "'XI' REFERENCING , .. ,-... 0. - AWG AMERICAN WIRE GUAGE MGR. MANAGER , -. . , BLKG. BLOCKING N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT SHEET NUMBER „ . BM R BASE MOBILE RADIO NJ .S. NOT TO SCALE - .-- CAB. CABINET o.c. ON CENTER 4611, . ' , , .' .-,- „ ELEVATION 114) TIGAR D F • a ., , A . 9 CLG. CEILING OPP. OPPOSITE . - CONC. CONCRETE PT PAINT . . i.: . .. :,..., M. N. L'I.0 ' CONT CONTINUOUS PR. PAIR r , ' Cu COPPER S.F. SQUARE FOOT Affik 1 PAIR SECTION . . . , r -, - • . . „ - , ' ' -. , A ., IA k1/4.. .;_. ,, ..„. - , ,--,,,,-, . ' DIA. DIAMETER SHT. SHEET - , r , . . , . , , , . , - , DWG. DRAWING r SIM. SIMILAR CAS 047C , . , ,. , • ;_. talk , . . . EA. EACH' STL. STEEL Lers, , . . _ ELEC. ELECTRICAL SUSI: SUSPENDED DETAIL TIGARD OREGON if $% 7 . EQ. EQUAL S 9 4 O .V. SHEET VINYL ' EQUIP EQUIPMENT TGL TEMPERED GLASS , . EXIST. EXISTING r TN N D TINNED , , EXT. EXTERIOR T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE , , F.F. FINISHED FLOOR T.O.M. TOP OF MASONRY , GA. GAUGE TYP. TYPICAL . GALV. GALVANIZED U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED . , , - GBX GYPSUM BOARD TYPE "X' V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD _ - - G.C. GENERAL CONTRACTOR V.T. - VINYL TILE :- GRND GROUND WDW., WINDOW -' 'r NO. DATE ' DESCRIPTION GYP. BD. GYPSUM BOARD W.WF ..= WELDED WIRE FAE3RIC - _ -- , r . - . - HARD'WD. HARDWOOD W/ - WITH „ -- - . _ , --, r . . A , , ,, , , , _ . . . , INT - INTERIOR - , . < 34, - .. AND //96 ZON N - ' -, „ - i . , - , . , , , , - 53G REVIEW ,...p. •-,-,.,-, , , '' ' - ' - MA), - - ' - MAXIM . , - . -r d' , - AT . - -, , _, , - .. . . , f--.'-r r .-' -- . - - , ' - ' - -. - .:. - :. -- - . ,. ' --' - ' r - ,........ , - A - - ---'- - ' 8 5/17/96 ZONING , SH' , . . r ,_ - , _ . . ,, , ' . ' , ' , NO. ' ' . , . - , . - r - , E. • N T S .. . , , VICINITY MAP - - SCAL p • • • , , , , ,. ... . s T-1 I TITLE SHEET AND VICINITY MAP , ... , _ _ , _ . , .. . • . - 1 SURVEY , , A ., . % A-1 I PROJECT AREA PLAN AND ELEVATION . _ . _ - I = „ ._ . , . I . - - _ , .. . - - , , a) . . . , ' • 1 . , ?).04 - , 1 GAZLEY t . , - 2 - . -4 /Po ---1 , .. , .. - t.:- . _ k4 1 i VO4 , -. . 4 •r' ' - , , . ,,.,,,, : r 011° , - . , . - , '.. ,.,. ? ‘'\ -, . , . , A ... \\/ . • , . 1 ' '. ' , • • ., cis . , '. • : C) . 4 , - - ' - - -,9 ' ' • ' ' ;.'.' a. 3/47,7 1 1/4 '1 ,-' ' ' - - -',.. ', ' A P T L KI OYIMAl\r NSON ' - ,. ‘ , ., 0 ..., A -- :- ' Architects - ',,,. - ;,;:, - ' ‘, _ 2 ST4 70 t 1 4) l' it‘ T 4 Vatighll ' '':, , , . , 1 .. , ... , - , , , _. .. . . , . , . , , . , , - , d , , , . . , , . . • , . . ., . . _ . , . . , , . . , , . , ... .. , , . -,...,„ .. .. , ,. 4,„ .. , . _ al -s- . , , , , _ ‘ . , . „. ., - 503 2'it 7800 -1,- ' , , .. „. ,. , - , , -s . .„ „ - - - \ , •.0. - _ . -7 4. __ . . , , - , , . - _ ,- , . , - , Z , , , . , , ,,, , G SITE . . . , , . - . ,- ,,, PROJECT: MANAGER - - ' - - "4 - '' , L =°-- :'-. . , 0 . - , „ , . r ° , - - - , - - , 1 J ■ , ■ it , . s , , , LUCENT ,,TECHNOLOGIES 4- - , ' , . - , .. - . , AND BECIJTEL - ' ' 2 , -4 - .• '' , .. - , - ..- ALLIANCE , ! I 'L' r" : ',-` °-, -- , . , . , 1 , ' ,- SPRINT; - ' . 1 ..,.:.,-, -...f , ,, ,.„-,-..:',, - -- N - -- -- - ---- - - , . , .. . DRIVING DIRECTIONS , , ''' SPECTRUM 1 . _ , ' I ' ' - - ' ' '---*- -- - LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;':- , FROM BEAVERTON TAKE 217 SOUTH TO PACIFIC HWY (99W). TURN RIGHT ON PACIFIC HWY TRAVELING WEST. TURN LEFT ON HALL BOULEVARD , ,. , TRAVELING SOUTH. TURN RIGHT ON BURNHAM ST. SITE WILL BE ON THE RIGHT. CITY HALL IS ON THE LEFT , _ ,. ..7 , INDE . SHEET , - -- NSTALLATiON _ p $ I'',. - C , ___ _ _ __ _ , , , • , 3 e e - - , ,■ PROJECT SITE NAME ,_ ., , a „ . - t ■ , . .. I , a ' , t , , ■ ' } a , ^ ' ■ , • ' ,, + . . + , ■ , i , , , , PROJECT MANAGER SITE NAME; , TIGARD PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION .. " ACCESS , EASEMENT DESCRIPTION (PROPOSED) _. , . - i) 'siTe. NAmE , .-.,-,-:-.:..--' , - ' .-- .,,,i-,, - ,- - -,_,,,t.: •-,-:: - , . ' TI TI GAR GAR D D, OREGON - . TIGARD, OR , A TRACT OF LAND 'SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER BECHTEL.: - "_. OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE 6975 SW SANDBURG RD , , TAX LOT: 2,000 A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF . - . TIGARD -- - L''' ' 7 - _ SITE ADDRESS: I ACRES: 4.04 : SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE '1 WEST, VVILL.AMETTE - MERIDIAN, IN .THE CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON . . SUITE 330 ,t SITE DESCRIPTION MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF TIGARD, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT ' PORTLAND, ok - 97223 - . 8777 SW BURHAM ' , ,.. ,,.. , ' --,.„,..;; "„...;',,,.,-„;•.:,„,e . , , _ _ AND STATE OF OREGON AND BEING A PORTION 11-AT TRACT OF LAND IN SURVEY NO. 24,689, WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY - - - _ ' „ „ , . - 1 , , , TIGARD, OR 97223 , _ , .,. - TIGARD, �R G"" .' - ,•- ,- - '-'-:, - ',.t's .... .• , , ... - . A PARC OF LAND AS DEPICTED IN RECORD'OF SURVEY NO -,. ,-- - OF LAND IN SURVEY NO 24 689 WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY ' RECORDS AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBECI AS FOLLOWS: " , ' . - . PHONE: (5 _ 03) 598-3937 , - ' OWNER: . ' ' ' - - ' - 24 689 WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOFZS OFFICE, BOUNDARY •-, CORDS AND MORE Rt. PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: , .... . , , I „ -, ' 1 ' ' UNE AS FOLLOWS: - ' ' -. i.,;' _ - ,..,-- 1 = - COMMENCING AT 4 SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT, ‘ , . ' CONTACT: RICK ERICH r _ , „ , . , ' CITY' OF TIGARD 'T • - ` - , , SITE Nk)MBER. , I' ' I,' - :-:, s .i n ' ' ' : '. -1 ' - BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID COMMENCING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY NORTHEASTERLY -_ r. : SAO POINT LYING ON THE NORTHERLY 'RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF S W BURNHAtvl STREET (C .R. 997); THENCE, SOUTH 4314' " 49 , . , , 13125 ,SW-,,HALL BLVD. . . _.--' 7 r . - ....,,..., , s , r - 4 : .., * - ,.,;.,, - ' OF SAID TRACT;' THENCE, SOUTH 44'50'12" WEST'ALONG 11-IE • • , - ' `TIGAIRD OR 97223 - - -"'-', ' 2 - P ARCEL AND BEING DEak.RIBED 11-1E COURSES: , , WEST 'ALONG SAID NORTHERLY UNE 55.8 FEET _ . , , ,, , # - - r . , ' - , I WESTERLY_ UNE OF SAID TRACT, 40.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF MORE OR LESS TO TI-IE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN . CM( ADMINISTRATOR: WILI_IAM MONAHAN , , , P : , g SOUTH 4007 . r 'i _ BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; - EASEMENT CENTER UN DESCRIPTION; '-- ARCHITECT _ , „. , , _ : 0 _ _, - - . , _ : " (503) 639-4171 _ - CAS -04 C- - ' ' --- , . EAST 535.98 FEET; SOUTH 02'05'37' WEST, 214.72 FEET TO A , , CURVE FOR A LENGTH OF 4-8.54 FEET, A RADIUS OF 31.00 FEET , THENCE SOUTH 4007'32" EAST, 40.00 FEET - THENCE, ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF A 10 FOOT WOE STRIP GAZLEY PLOWMAN ATI<INSON r . ' ' ''' APPLICANT: , , , _ ., , 0 . - AND AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 894240'' NORTH 881207* WEST, , ;. , . . OF LAND, 5.00 FEET EACH SIDE OF SAID CENTER LINE, - _ 2701 N.W. VAUGHN . , , ..- N# NORTH 45'30'46" EAST, 265.74 FEET; - - , SUITE 764 ' . . . , 84 54 FEET TO A CURVE FOR A LENGTH Of, 149.07 FEET. r. THENCE, SOUTH 44'50'12" WEST, 40.00 FEET; - ro , - • a , .- SPRINT SPECTRUM LP. .„--• . ; ' ' -- -, ' :.'; .., ,s-. , f, '-'c .. c-- ,• A RADIUS OF 190.00 FEET ,AND AN INCLUDED- ANGLE OF 44'57'16"; , -. . ADDRES$ . '' :2- '- -,' i- ,`' ,. NORTH 431449" WEST, 351 FEET NORTI-j- 4042'07 - EAST, - THENCE IsIORTI-1 4Cf0732" WEST, 40.00 FEET; 11-I r , - . - ENCE NORTH 40'07'32" WEST, 264.02 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF , , , r PORTLAND, OR 97210 ; ' B F MOHAWK r . , , # , _253.17 FEET; NORTH 40'07 WEST, 253.21 , , . r' - - SAD CENTER LI NE DESCRIPTION . ... - - . __ , _ -.. _ ' '' , ' OFFICE 14' 0 61 03) 9 6 7 1 0 2 6 - 2 0244 - . ` . ' . - • PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4450'12" EAST, 80.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE NOFilli EAST, 4-0.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF _ ... , . PHONE: (503) 274-7800 T - 1 . , _ , - SIDELINES SUBJECT TO LENGTHENING, AND/ Ck:'SHORTENING TO _ , ''''' - ' : ''- ' r n* ' ' TfGARD OR -- 47223 '''' '.-.,),:',', . - - BEGINNING. _ _ _. , . 1 to - ' - - TO TERMINATE UPON THE PROPER BouNDAREs CONTACT STEVE PLOWMAN . CO: - - , 01 , I (3) . , . . , , -- ZONING: 'CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT a ' - ' ' '"r'.'3 ' ' - r-,"'''.. ''.; ; -,- CONTAINS #-' ' ,.'t: - ' :'-:', -•„:,; : z 'r , AINS 1 ,600 SQUARE FEET . CONTAINS 5291 SQUARE FEEL , ._ _ ' , , , OCCUPANCY. N\ - A '` ,- r - ,-,... - . , -.........„... - f4r- THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE INSTALLATION- AND OPERATION OF , I I- - . _ _ 1 .‘i . SHEEt TITLE ,,,:.. 6-: ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT CABINETS, FOji SPRINT , - ' ' CONSTRUCTION TYPE: IAA -:.-- - - , ' SPECTRUM MOBIL SERVICES' ,PERSONAL COM_MUNICATIONS SERVICE ' .. SITE ACQUISITION , . - . , -1 ' (PcS) NETWORK. A TOTAL OF ' ANTENNAS AND $ EQUIPMENT `, - ,.' , ' _ . , ,. , , -, , VCI , .- , , , ,- , r , , CABINETS ARE PROPOSED AT THIS SITE - EACH ANTENNA IS 0.3° ' ' ' ' n - ''' ' '' ' `TITLE - SHEET -: No, . , , _ _ , , , _ -, wiDE BY 2"" INCHES DEEP BY 5'-4" TALL. - THE SELF-CONTAINED • , . . SUITE #100 , , . , - ' ''-'''.- '.. '13 - , . 7160 S‘flf.. J-IAZ,ELFERN ST. „ _ - - , , . ' EQUIPMENT CABINETS ARE 2'-6" WIDE BY 2':-6 DEEP BY 5 -0" r... _ , , - .. . . . , . ----. , MAP TALL. THE SYSTEM WILL BOTH TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE' RADIO . - . - , , , ' " . ' • TIGARD, OR ''':‘, 97224 _. " ' , . . _ , - , r . ., . , r - , - ,,, vic Ty,- finAp- , , Li_., . ... . _ . . _ , , ,. PHONE:, (503) 598-1880 ' , , . , . , . , SIGNALS FOR A REGIONAL PC$ NETWORK. 2 - , , . <> . , . - , , - ' . ,. ..,- ' -..,' --!-- .-,•; '-,- . - ". tiEt NUNISER, .--,,- --, , e-,t-.; - q„, ,-.2 - „ ,., , , , CONTACT ART McOMBER ' ' ', ' &O -COMPYANCE:- _,_ ' nt. ' .' ' ' n ''‘ , . ' - !_-',--,, s r ''-'' - . ; ''''' . ' :-''''''--..„-, ALL OF TI-LE ANTENNAS WILL BE' MOUNTED Ot4 AN EXISTING TOWER. - , , to Pi _ THE EQUIPMENT CABINETS ARE PROPOSED TO SIT- NEAR THE BASE ,.. : ' ' FAdIUTY IS NOT STAFFED AND fslOT 19RMALLY' DeelfPIEEi , ;-",- ' ''''%"' ' '' ' : - , , . ' ' 4`'---;-',; •-'' - i !. ,, ` OF THE TOWER. A NEW 13)-0" HIGH FENCE, .26.!-6" x - 16'-0", , 7 . a '' - , A . , , „„ ' . ;1: ' 7 ' , nx ; :::. . - • ,., IS PROPOSED TO ENCOMPASS ALL OF THE NEW EQUIPMENT - ‚ 0) , , . , .-- , , . -'- _ . _ , , , _ , , . .. . , . ..., - , , , r -. , , , PROJE , . - . LEGAL DESCRIPTION - - - ' PROJECT- AREA DESCRIPTION -.. ' -PROJECT' 'DESCRIPTION ,-- - - , PROJECT TEAM ; - : , . ,. , -..: :- ,,- , .: ,-SiJMNIARY ., -, , ., - ,. _,-,:, -- ., :,-, , ..,, , ci) , . s ., , • 4 ,. A r . . ., 4,. r , , . . , _ . "` •' , - . 9 . 7 • „,__ , , a „ , • .. . . _ .. - ._ , „. ,A7. ' , , s , ,, , „. , „„ a . , , _ „ • .. , ,.. A a . . .,.. .' ■ ,, , 9