Loading...
CUP1996-00001 • • • , A CITY OF TIGARD • CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER a BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 Case Name(s): WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE Name of Owner: Irwin Schimmel Name of Applicant: Western PCS Corporation Monopole Address of Applicant: 7535B NE Ambassador City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97201 Address of Property: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S1 01 DD. Tax Lot 00800 , Request: > A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. Zone: Light Industrial (I -L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Action: > ❑ Approval as requested © Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © .The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:9 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON APRIL 15, 1996, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. • Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON APRIL 15, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 96-0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Concerns an application by Western PCS Corporation for a ) FINAL ORDER conditional use permit to develop a 100 -foot cellular communications monopole. ) CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) 1. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to develop a cellular communications monopole to improve cellular phone service along the 1 -5 and 217 Highway corridors. Hearings Officer Deniece Won held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on March 25, 1996. City staff recommended conditional approval of the permit. The applicant generally accepted the staff report and recommendation but recommended an alternate screening plan. The screening plan he proposed includes a slatted fence on three sides and landscaping on the 1 -5 side of the site to meet the City's 15% landscaping requirements. LOCATION: A five hundred twenty -five (525) square foot portion of the Power Rents site located off SW 72nd Avenue north of Landmark Lane; WCTM 2S1 1DD, Tax Lot 800. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION: I -L (Light Industrial). APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation. OWNER: Irwin Schimmel. APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.98, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, 8.1.3 and 12.4. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve. HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approve. Page .1 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • A. Hearing. II. HEARING Hearings Officer Deniece Won received testimony at the ubli application on March 25, 1996. A record of that testimony is included (Parties of Record), and Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings). These P c hearing about this Tigard City Hall. a exhibits are at the A B. Summary of oral testimony. 1. City Planner Mark Roberts testified for the City. He summarized recommendation. City staff recommended conditional approval zed the staff report 2. Mike Berndorf testified for the applicant. The p al of the permit. s report Mike re commendations but suggested staff of the ort and r include a slatted but sugge sted an alternate screening a applicant generally . gge y pported the and landscaping on the freeway side of the site. On the I -5 freeway g p He proposed stated the applicant the freeway meet the City the e site. s minimum 15 fence all but the ay freeway of the site way side of the site he requirements. 9 d percent landscaping 3. Mark Roberts stated that City staff supported the alternate plan. proposed screening III. FINDINGS The Hearings Officer adopts and incorporates herein the Tigard Development Staff Report dated March 14, 1996 (the "Staff Re summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable a g Community comments, and evaluation of the request, except to the ex approval standards, agency Report"), including the tent expressly ly modi fied fied. IV. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. The Site Plan 1 . The site consists of approximately 8 acres occupied by Power property is bordered by commercial and light industrial uses on all sides. is located directly east of the subject property. The proposed Rents. The located on the northern edge of the property and will be accessi s' The Interstate -5 driveway. Posed facility will a Y• Approximately 525 square feet of the Power Rents sine will be le s e proposed use. 9 paved eased for the 2. The lease area will include a one - hundred foot monopole outfitted with athree- sector antenna array. panel measures a y. Each sector contains three antenna panels. Each top pproximately four feet long and six inches wide. The antenna will be mounted vertically on three support beams. The beams extend approximately two 9 Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • feet from the sides of the freestanding pole. There may also be one or more small microwave dishes (two -foot diameter) attached to the monopole structure and located approximately twenty feet below the antenna panels. These microwave dishes might be added later to augment telephone service at the site. 3. There will be four steel equipment cabinets, each measuring forty -eight inches in height, and occupying space ten feet long by thirty -two inches wide. The applicant will mount these cabinets on a concrete pad next to the monopole structure. Three sides of the facility will be surrounded by a six -foot high slatted chain link fence. The applicant will landscape the Interstate -5 Highway side of the facility to meet the City of Tigard's 15 percent landscaping requirements. B. Landscaping And Screening The applicant originally proposed to plant an arborvitae hedge within a four -foot area around three sides of the leased area. At the hearing, the applicant proposed an alternate screening plan that would include a slatted chain -link fence on three sides of the site and landscaping on the Interstate -5 side of the site. V. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS • 1. The Tigard Community Development Code requires that the minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. TCDC 18.70.050(6). Fifteen percent of the leased area is 79 square feet. The Hearings Officer decided that the 15 percent landscaping requirement should be calculated on the area within the leased area subject to development approval, or the applicant should prove that he is entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. 2. The Tigard Community Development Code buffering and screening provisions apply when adjacent uses are of a different type. TCDC 18.100.070(B). Here, the adjacent uses are of the same type and the buffering and screening requirements do not apply. 3. The Tigard Community Development Code in section 18.120.150(A) requires that the applicant shall submit a site plan that includes "The location of underground irrigation system sprinkler heads where applicable." 4. The Tigard Community Development Code requires screening of service facilities. TCDC Sec. 18.120.180(A)(4)(b). Specifically the Code requires that "On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas ... shall be provided ... " and sets out some factors for deciding the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening. 5. The Tigard Community Development Code requires asphalt or concrete surfaces for parking or storage areas. TCDC Sec. 18.106.050(J). Specifically the Code requires Page 3 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • that ". . . all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, .. . shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces." VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site before the hearing without the company of others. VII. EVALUATION OF REQUEST 1. The proposed use complies with Chapter 18.70 (Light Industrial District) because the use, "utilities" which would allow the communications tower is listed as a conditional use. Code Section 18.70.040(A)(2). The maximum height allowed by the Code is 45 feet. The proposed cellular communication tower is exempt from the height limitations of the underlying zone. 18.98.010(A)(2): "Projections such as chimneys, spires, domes, elevator shaft housings, towers excluding TV dish receivers, aerials, flag poles, and other similar objects not used for human occupancy, are not subject to the building height limitations of this title." 2. The proposed use can comply with Chapters 18.70 and 18.120 by imposing a condition of approval that requires that the site plan will provide that a minimum of 15 percent of the site will be developed with landscaping. The Hearings Officer decided that the 15 percent landscaping requirement should be calculated on the area within the leased area subject to development approval, or the applicant should demonstrate that as part of the lease agreement he is entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The screening requirements can be met by imposing a condition that three sides of the site be surrounded by a 6 -foot high slatted chain -link fence. 3. City staff proposed conditions to require that the site plan be revised to include an irrigation plan and to show that areas for service vehicles will be paved. These conditions are supported by requirements in Tigard's Code. 4. The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit will comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. VIII. ORDER A. Approval of CUP 96 -0001 In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and exhibits Page 4 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby approves CUP 96-0001, subject to the following conditions of approval: B. Amended Conditions , 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site and landscaping plan that shows provision for the following: a) The applicant shall either provide at least 79 square feet of landscaping within the leasehold area or prove that as a part of the lease agreement that the lessee is entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The applicant shall also provide a landscaping irrigation plan unless a landscape architect finds that this is not necessary. b) The applicant shall revise the plan to provide screening of the equipment structures from view. Such screening may consist of a slatted chain -link fence and at least 79 square feet of landscaping on the 1 -5 side of the site. c) The applicant shall revise the plan to show that those areas which will accommodate a service vehicle, be used for parking, storage or maneuvering will be paved with asphalt or concrete surfaces. DATED this 3rd day of April, 1996 7 .. _..r.e„fc_...e_. a. ,,,.dity Deniece B. Won, Hearings Officer Page 5 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: March 25, 1996 Time: 7:00 PM BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0001 PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a cellular communications monopole. APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation 7535 -B NE Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97201 OWNER: Irwin Schimmel 14020 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I -L) ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I -L) LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL, subject to the following conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 1 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • In recognition of the findings staff recommends that the Hearings Officer approve Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0001 subject to the following requirements: • ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site and landscaping plan that shows provision for the following: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. a. The applicant shall demonstrate that as a part of the lease agreement that they are entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The applicant shall also provide a landscaping irrigation plan unless a landscape architect finds that this is not necessary. b. The applicant shall revise the plan to provide arborvitae landscaping to screen the equipment structures from view of the adjoining freeways. c. The applicant shall revise the plan to indicate that those areas which are to accommodate a service vehicle are to be paved. III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: The property is currently developed with a construction equipment rental facility. In 1990 at the request of the property owner, the site was rezoned from Planned Industrial I -P to Light Industrial I -L. The City has no record of any other recent land use applications having been submitted for this developed property. The applicant has proposed to develop the cellular monopole to improve cellular phone service for the 1 -5 and Highway 217 corridors and surrounding areas. Vicinity Information: The subject parcel is approximately eight acres. The area which is to be leased for this purpose consists of approximately 525 square feet of the eight acre site. The proposed monopole site to be leased is rectangular in shape and measures approximately 15 feet by 35 feet. The affected portion of the site is relatively level and was previously paved. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is located approximately 450 feet south of the south east corner of SW North Dakota Street and SW Scholls Ferry Road. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 2 Existing Uses and Structe: • The subject property is currently developed for use as an equipment rental commercial facility. The area proposed to be leased for development of the antenna would be a small • portion of the site located approximately 190 feet to the east of the main commercial equipment rental building. The proposed monopole pad site is also not presently used for other existing site activities such as equipment storage, driveways or service areas. Surrounding Land Uses: The monopole site is immediately surrounded on all sides by the Power Rents equipment rental facility. Generally the entire Power Rents site is surrounded on all sides by other industrial uses with exception of the area to the east of the site which is the Interstate 5 Freeway. IV. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Section 18.70 (Development Standards) allows Utilities subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Development Code defines uses such as the proposed antenna tower as a utility which is a conditionally permitted use within the Light Industrial (I -L) Zoning District. Section 18.70 does not specify a minimum parcel size or width requirement for a parcel • within the I -L Zone. For these reasons and because the applicant has not proposed to purchase the subject property, the site meets the minimum development site requirements of the I -L Zone. Section 18.70 does not require that setbacks be provided other than from the centerline of certain streets, within clear vision areas and for parking lot screening purposes. These standards either do not apply due to the nature of the proposal or are addressed elsewhere within this report. Section 18.70 specifies that a maximum height of 45 feet is permitted for habitable structures. Section 18.98 provides an exemption from height limits for all non - habitable structures. Section 18.70 specifies that the minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. Fifteen percent of the leased area of the site is 79 square feet. The applicant has proposed an arborvitae hedge to be planted within a four foot area around three sides of the actual lease hold area. The area to be landscaped exceeds the minimum 15% area standard, however, the applicant shall demonstrate that as a part of the lease agreement that they are entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The applicant shall also demonstrate how the proposed landscaping will be irrigated where necessary. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 3 • • • Section 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) provides standards for landscaping and screening for between uses of varying intensity. This section does not provide specific land use buffers between a utility use and the existing surrounding industrial uses. Section 18.102 (Visual Clearance) requires that a visual clearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right -of -ways. Because the location of the fenced pad area is not at the intersection of two (2) driveways, the fence and other site improvements are not subject to the clear vision standards. Section 18.106 (Parking) does not specify a specific parking ratio for this type of utility use. Section 18.106.050.J.1 specifies that with the exception one and two family residential dwelling units, temporary uses and fleet storage uses that all areas to be used maneuvering of vehicles shall be paved. The applicant has provided a concrete pad around the monopole which complies with this standard. The applicant has also proposed graveled areas around the pad. The Development Code does not allow the use of gravel for any area which is designed for maneuvering of vehicles. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate that those areas which are to accommodate a service vehicle are to be paved. Section 18.106 (Bicycle Facilities) requires one bicycle parking space is for each 15 required automobile parking spaces. .Because this site is intended to be an unstaffed utility and no parking spaces are required this standard is not deemed to be applicable. Section 18.108.080 (Vehicular Access) does not provide a minimum driveway width standard for driveway access to utility facilities. Because the proposal is not planned to be a staffed installation and is to be located within a paved service area of an existing commercial development, the existing commercial type driveway from SW 72nd Avenue complies with the Community Development Code access requirements. Because no minimum entrance width is specified for access to an unstaffed utility installation, the eight (8) foot wide chain link gate is acceptable as proposed. Section 18.108 (Pedestrian Circulation) requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from the ground floor entrances from commercial and industrial development to the streets which provides the required pedestrian access and egress. Because the site is proposed to be an unstaffed utility facility this standard is not deemed to be applicable to this proposal. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Became effective on January 26, 1992. The act requires one disabled person parking space if one (1) to twenty -five (25) parking spaces are provided. Because this type of facility does not require parking spaces to be provided, no handicapped accessible parking space is required. The Building Department will review the site for compliance with other provisions of the ADA prior to the issuance of Building Permits. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 4 Section 18.120.180 (SO Development Review) This •tion requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of other Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.70, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. The proposal has been reviewed for consistency with these sections elsewhere within this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.94 (Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations), 18.134 (Variance), 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures), 18.150 (Tree Removal) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These sections are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These standards are also found not to be applicable or have been addressed immediately below. Section 18.120.180. A.4 (a -b) (Screening From Adjoining Properties) - The applicant has proposed arborvitae plantings around the proposed facility on three (3) sides as viewed from the Power Rents site. It is recommended that this same type of landscape material be provided to screen the equipment structures from view of the adjoining industrial uses. Section 18.130.040 (Conditional Use Permits) contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1) The site size and dimensions provide: a. Adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatment to mitigate possible adverse effects from the use on surrounding properties and uses. 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5) The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 Site Development Review are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use as revised through the recommended Conditions of Approval complies with all site development standards set forth for the Commercial Professional Zoning District. The property is physically separated from residential areas due to its location. Proposed landscaping will partially screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The monopole itself has been designed to blend into the background as much as possible. The pole is to be constructed of a galvanized finish which would match other light poles Which are constructed nearby to illuminate the 217 /Interstate 5 interchange. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 5 The applicant has not reested that public facilities be ma•available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The "locational criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minor collector street. The site is proposed to be provided within an easement to a commercial driveway which provides direct access to SW 72nd Avenue which is designated as a Major Collector Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements which are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna through the planting of shrubs. The antenna itself is described in the applicants submittal as being a neutral galvanized finish so as to not draw attention to the structure. No other unique natural features have been noted on this site. The property is level and requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use which maximizes energy efficiency and convenience. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Section 18.164 (Streets and Utilities) contains development standards for streets and utilities. The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has proposed only to extend electrical service and may need to extend water service to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities to the site. V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and had no comments or concerns. • • STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 6 • • • . • • • • R 7 • WIG WM !MEM el V ME OM MVO.", . r a0_ CET m vR >RW • TIIJ I • , • ,7 o MIMI VOW NM I rIi i � 4�4` 4`4 4� �d��bb h y 0 �6 4 4'4 t.: ' - r • TYPICAL SITE SECTION • op.. T 0I ,O Mt • MS m,aa of Y' • h-t1I-HIPI +11:11-3 a 7 ._ =__________-- 4 g V.I r CC i �� a : • .. _ Alt. 1% . 117 IV WEIVIRLS ..o® ens ammo A AIG: �` .- .... ... 'v • / In OW e vOm em r most wo® us o Iii I 1 ma.,m as s MK 41110 'm. MOM L. m TOL MR. Vu VI C 1 iimm 0 PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP C UP96 -0001 Western PCS Corp. Monopole • • . 1 1 1 1 l 1 \ VAR S FIR ill t i\\ 1 FIR LP SWIRL PC-1 ST 1 CO o_ a) 3 o . .,, . _ (3) •� CT . - c� ok, c a P . R A N h 6 n i f i A • v; r ____K i ni t4N, 0. % T L 0 . _ co 11‘0 0) 1 0 -------N f BOMTARD 0 U g l vicinity map A CUP 96 - 0001 Western PCS Corp. Monopole Note: Map is not to scat¢ A 1 • • • . ., 1 , \ , , ! . .. ii' City of Tigard, Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist I1 for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: {Check box above, H applicable} (check appropriate box below} (Enter Public Hearing Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission • ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Cheslc boxabove,aapplicable) City of Tigard Planning Director That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED D) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Check box above, it applicable) (check appropriate box below} ' ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑^/ Tigard Planning Commission W Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council • ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION /NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A ", was rrw�iled to each n- - ed Re on(s) at the addres5(s) shown on the e att- - - • ist(s), marked Exhibit "B ",, ; e _, YM d- 7of = ,i, . 1 ' 199 (' and deposited in the U ed States Mail on� Mal day of , /; d I �,/� 199 ' , postage prepaid. 1 - pared Notice ��� Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the da of, ,' 1i.. / _ 19 1 y i.� ,ww. OFFICIAL SEAL I 4 r- a DIANE M JELDERKS l 1 �l/, - I / / :. ®, '' 1 COMMISS ON 046 O 42 _ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999. NOTARY PUBLIC OF,' GON My Commission Exp . dFILEINPO.:G (� _ . NAME(S): /� / Las l w fr,Y4 /7 � t ?2P7' l e1 CASE NO.(S): iG �j A O wo Cup , `00_000 TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: • CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER q BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 Case Name(s): WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE Name of Owner: Irwin Schimmel Name of Applicant: Western PCS Corporation Monopole Address of Applicant: 7535B NE Ambassador City: Portland State: Oregon Zip: 97201 Address of Property: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 2S1 01 DD. Tax Lot 00800 Request: > A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. Zone: Light Industrial (I -L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Action: > ❑ Approval as requested • © Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies © The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator © The applicant and owner(s) Final Decision:9 THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON APRIL 15, 1996, 1996 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON APRIL 15, 1996. Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Dept. at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 96 -0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Concerns an application by Western PCS Corporation for a ) FINAL ORDER conditional use permit to develop a 100 -foot cellular communications monopole. ) CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) 1. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to develop a cellular communications monopole to improve cellular phone service along the 1 -5 and 217 Highway corridors. Hearings Officer Deniece Won held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the application on March 25, 1996. City staff recommended conditional approval of the permit. The applicant generally accepted the staff report and recommendation but recommended an alternate screening plan. The screening plan he proposed includes a slatted fence on three sides and landscaping on the 1 -5 side of the site to meet the City's 15% landscaping requirements. LOCATION: A five hundred twenty -five (525) square foot portion of the Power Rents site located off SW 72nd Avenue north of Landmark Lane; WCTM 2S1 1 DD, Tax Lot 800. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION: I -L (Light Industrial). APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation. OWNER: Irwin Schimmel. APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.98, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130, and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 4.2.1, 7.1.2, 7.3.1, 7.4.4, 8.1.1, 8.1.3 and 12.4. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Conditionally approve. HEARINGS OFFICER DECISION: Conditionally approve. Page 1 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • A. Hearing. 11. HEARING Hearings Officer Deniece Won received testimony at the ubli application on March 25, 1996. A record of that testimony is included (Parties of Record), and Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings). These p c hearing about this Tigard City Hall. herein as Exhibit A exhibits are filed at the B. Summary of oral testimony. 1. City Planner Mark Roberts testified for the City. He summari zed the staff report and recommendation. City staff recommended conditional a rov 2. Mike Berndorf testified for the applicant. The pp al of the permit. staff report and re commendations but suggested an alternate screening that the screening include a slatted chain-li he applicant generally supported the and landscaping on the freeway nk fenc on all but the freeway de of �he site stated the applicant would meet the City of T gard's minimum 15 freeway cen laof ndscaping the a ite he requirements. m 15 percent landscaping 3. Mark Roberts stated that City staff supported the alternate plan. proposed screening III. FINDINGS The Hearings Officer adopts and incorporates herein the Tigard Development Staff Report dated March 14, 1996 (the "Staff Re summary, findings about the site and surroundings, applicable Community comments, and evaluation of the request, extent expressly modified. IV. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. The Site Plan 1. The site consists of approximately 8 acres occupied property is bordered by commercial and light industrial uses on all sid s e t Thes The freeway is located directly east of the subject property. The proposed facility located on the northern edge of the property and will be accessible The Interstate -5 existing will paved driveway. Approximately 525 square feet of the Power Rents site an existin proposed use. a wit ll be leased fothe 2. The lease area will include a one - hundred foot monopole outfitted with a three - sector antenna array. Each sector contains three ant Each antenna panel measures approximately at the top pproximately four feet long and six inches wide The antenna will be mounted vertically on three support beams. The beams ex Pa e 2 - tend approximately two 9 Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • • feet from the sides of the freestanding pole. There may also be one or more small microwave dishes (two -foot diameter) attached to the monopole structure and located approximately twenty feet below the antenna panels. These microwave dishes might be added later to augment telephone service at the site. 3. There will be four steel equipment cabinets, each measuring forty -eight inches in height, and occupying space ten feet long by thirty -two inches wide. The applicant will mount these cabinets on a concrete pad next to the monopole structure. Three sides of the facility will be surrounded by a six -foot high slatted chain link fence. The applicant will landscape the Interstate -5 Highway side of the facility to meet the City of Tigard's 15 percent landscaping requirements. B. Landscaping And Screening The applicant originally proposed to plant an arborvitae hedge within a four -foot area around three sides of the leased area. At the hearing, the applicant proposed an alternate screening plan that would include a slatted chain -link fence on three sides of the site and landscaping on the Interstate -5 side of the site. V. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS 1. The Tigard Community Development Code requires that the minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. TCDC 18.70.050(6). Fifteen percent of the leased area is 79 square feet. The Hearings Officer decided that the 15 percent landscaping requirement should be calculated on the area within the leased area subject to development approval, or the applicant should prove that he is entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. 2. The Tigard Community Development Code buffering and screening provisions apply when adjacent uses are of a different type. TCDC 18.100.070(B). Here, the adjacent uses are of the same type and the buffering and screening requirements do not apply. 3. The Tigard Community Development Code in section 18.120.150(A) requires that the applicant shall submit a site plan that includes The location of underground irrigation system sprinkler heads where applicable." 4. The Tigard Community Development Code requires screening of service facilities. TCDC Sec. 18.120.180(A)(4)(b). Specifically the Code requires that "On site screening from view from adjoining properties of such things as service areas, storage areas ... shall be provided ... " and sets out some factors for deciding the adequacy of the type and extent of the screening. • 5. The Tigard Community Development Code requires asphalt or concrete surfaces for parking or storage areas. TCDC Sec. 18.106.050(J). Specifically the Code requires Page 3 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • that ". . . all areas used for the parking or storage or maneuvering of any vehicle, . . . shall be improved with asphalt or concrete surfaces." VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The Hearings Officer visited the site before the hearing without the company of others. VII. EVALUATION OF REQUEST 1. The proposed use complies with Chapter 18.70 (Light Industrial District) because the use, "utilities" which would allow the communications tower is listed as a conditional use. Code Section 18.70.040(A)(2). The maximum height allowed by the Code is 45 feet. The proposed cellular communication tower is exempt from the height limitations of the underlying zone. 18.98.010(A)(2): "Projections such as chimneys, spires, domes, elevator shaft housings, towers excluding TV dish receivers, aerials, flag poles, and other similar objects not used for human occupancy, are not subject to the building height limitations of this title." 2. The proposed use can comply with Chapters 18.70 and 18.120 by imposing a condition of approval that requires that the site plan will provide that a minimum of 15 percent of the site will be developed with landscaping. The Hearings Officer decided that the 15 percent landscaping requirement should be calculated on the area within the leased area subject to development approval, or the applicant should demonstrate that as part of the lease agreement he is entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The screening requirements can be met by imposing a condition that three sides of the site be surrounded by a 6 -foot high slatted chain -link fence. 3. City staff proposed conditions to require that the site plan be revised to include an irrigation plan and to show that areas for service vehicles will be paved. These conditions are supported by requirements in Tigard's Code. 4. The Hearings Officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit will comply with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. VIII. ORDER A. Approval of CUP 96 - 0001 In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of affected agencies and public testimony and exhibits Page 4 - Hearings Officer decision - CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • .• received in this matter, the Hearings Officer hereby approves CUP 96-0001, subject to the • following conditions of approval: B. Amended Conditions 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site and landscaping plan that shows provision for the following: a) The applicant shall either provide at least 79 square feet of landscaping within the leasehold area or prove that as a part of the lease agreement that the lessee is entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The applicant shall also provide a landscaping irrigation plan unless a landscape architect finds that this is not necessary. b) The applicant shall revise the plan to provide screening of the equipment structures from view. Such screening may consist of a slatted chain -link fence and at least 79 square feet of landscaping on the 1 -5 side of the site. c) The applicant shall revise the plan to show that those areas which will accommodate a service vehicle, be used for parking, storage or maneuvering will be paved with asphalt or concrete surfaces. DATED this 3rd day of April, 1 996 Deniece B. Won, Hearings Officer Page 5 - Hearings Officer decision CUP 96 -0001 (Western PCS Corp.) • • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: March 25, 1996 Time: 7:00 PM • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0001 PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a cellular communications monopole. APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation 7535 -B NE Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97201 OWNER: Irwin Schimmel 14020 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I - L) ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I -L) LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL, subject to the following conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 1 • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL • In recognition of the findings staff recommends that the Hearings Officer approve • - Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0001 subject to the following requirements: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO • THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site and landscaping plan that shows provision for the following: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. a. The applicant shall demonstrate that as a part of the lease agreement that they are entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The applicant shall also provide a landscaping irrigation plan unless a landscape architect finds that this is not necessary. b. The applicant shall revise the plan to provide arborvitae landscaping to screen the equipment structures from view of the adjoining freeways. c. The applicant shall revise the plan to indicate that those areas which are to accommodate a service vehicle are to be paved. III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: The property is currently developed with a construction equipment rental facility. In 1990 at the request of the property owner, the site was rezoned from Planned Industrial I -P to Light Industrial I -L. The City has no record of any other recent land use applications having been submitted for this developed property. The applicant has proposed to develop the cellular monopole to improve cellular phone service for the 1 -5 and Highway 217 corridors and surrounding areas. Vicinity Information: The subject parcel is approximately eight acres. The area which is to be leased for this purpose consists of approximately 525 square feet of the eight acre site. The proposed monopole site to be leased is rectangular in shape and measures approximately 15 feet by 35 feet. The affected portion of the site is relatively level and was previously paved. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is located approximately 450 feet south of the south east corner of SW North Dakota Street and SW Scholls Ferry Road. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 2 Existing Uses and Structu: • - The subject property is currently developed for use as an equipment rental commercial facility. The area proposed to be leased for development of the antenna would be a small portion of the site located approximately 190 feet to the east of the main commercial equipment rental building. The proposed monopole pad site is also not presently used for other existing site activities such as equipment storage, driveways or service areas. Surrounding Land Uses: The monopole site is immediately surrounded on all sides by the Power Rents equipment rental facility. Generally the entire Power Rents site is surrounded on all sides by other industrial uses with exception of the area to the east of the site which is the Interstate 5 Freeway. IV. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Section 18.70 (Development Standards) allows Utilities subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Development Code defines uses such as the proposed antenna tower as a utility which is a conditionally permitted use within the Light Industrial (I -L) Zoning District. Section 18.70 does not specify a minimum parcel size or width requirement for a parcel within the I -L Zone. For these reasons and because the applicant has not proposed to purchase the subject property, the site meets the minimum development site requirements of the I -L Zone. Section 18.70 does not require that setbacks be provided other than from the centerline of certain streets, within clear vision areas and for parking lot screening purposes. These standards either do not apply due to the nature of the proposal or are addressed elsewhere within this report. Section 18.70 specifies that a maximum height of 45 feet is permitted for habitable structures. Section 18.98 provides an exemption from height limits for all non - habitable structures. Section 18.70 specifies that the minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. Fifteen percent of the leased area of the site is 79 square feet. The applicant has proposed an arborvitae hedge to be planted within a four foot area around three sides of the actual lease hold area. The area to be landscaped exceeds the minimum 15% area standard, however, the applicant shall demonstrate that as a part of the lease agreement that they are entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The applicant shall also demonstrate how the proposed landscaping will be irrigated where necessary. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 3 • • • Section 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) provides standards for landscaping - and screening for between uses of varying intensity. This section does not provide • specific land use buffers between a utility use and the existing surrounding industrial uses. Section 18.102 (Visual Clearance) requires that a visual clearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right -of -ways. Because the location of the fenced pad area is not at the intersection of two (2) driveways, the fence and other site improvements are not subject to the clear vision standards. Section 18.106 (Parking) does not specify a specific parking ratio for this type of utility use. Section 18.106.050.J.1 specifies that with the exception one and two family residential dwelling units, temporary uses and fleet storage uses that all areas to be used maneuvering of vehicles shall be paved. The applicant has provided a concrete pad around the monopole which complies with this standard. The applicant has also proposed graveled areas around the pad. The Development Code does not allow the use of gravel for any area which is designed for maneuvering of vehicles. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate that those areas which are to accommodate a service vehicle are to be paved. Section 18.106 (Bicycle Facilities) requires one bicycle parking space is for each 15 required automobile parking spaces. Because this site is intended to be an unstaffed utility and no parking spaces are required this standard is not deemed to be applicable. Section 18.108.080 (Vehicular Access) does not provide a minimum driveway width standard for driveway access to utility facilities. Because the proposal is not planned to be a staffed installation and is to be located within a paved service area of an existing commercial development, the existing commercial type driveway from SW 72nd Avenue complies with the Community Development Code access requirements. Because no minimum entrance width is specified for access to an unstaffed utility installation, the eight (8) foot wide chain link gate is acceptable as proposed. Section 18.108 (Pedestrian Circulation) requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from the ground floor entrances from commercial and industrial development to the streets which provides the required pedestrian access and egress. Because the site is proposed to be an unstaffed utility facility this standard is not deemed to be applicable to this proposal. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Became effective on January 26, 1992. The act requires one disabled person parking space if one (1) to twenty -five (25) parking spaces are provided. Because this type of facility does not require parking spaces to be provided, no handicapped accessible parking space is required. The Building Department will review the site for compliance with other provisions of the ADA prior to the issuance of Building Permits. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 4 Section 18.120.180 (St Development Review) This •tion requires that a development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of other Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.70, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. The proposal has been reviewed for consistency with these sections elsewhere within this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.94 (Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations), 18.134 (Variance), 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures), 18.150 (Tree Removal) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These sections are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These standards are also found not to be applicable or have been addressed immediately below. Section 18.120.180. A.4 (a -b) (Screening From Adjoining Properties) - The applicant has proposed arborvitae plantings around the proposed facility on three (3) sides as viewed from the Power Rents site. It is recommended that this same type of landscape material be provided to screen the equipment structures from view of the adjoining industrial uses. Section 18.130.040 (Conditional Use Permits) contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1) The site size and dimensions provide: a. Adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatment to mitigate possible adverse effects from the use on surrounding properties and uses. 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5) The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 Site Development Review are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use as revised through the recommended Conditions of Approval complies with all site development standards set forth for the Commercial Professional Zoning District. The property is physically separated from residential areas due to its location. Proposed landscaping will partially screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The monopole itself has been designed to blend into the background as much as possible. The pole is to be constructed of a galvanized finish which would match other light poles which are constructed nearby to illuminate the 217 /Interstate interchange. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 5 The applicant has not rillested that public facilities be ma• available to serve this development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The locational criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minor collector street. The site is proposed to be provided within an easement to a commercial driveway which provides direct access to SW 72nd Avenue which is designated as a Major Collector Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements which are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. ' The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna through the planting of shrubs. The antenna itself is described in the applicants submittal as being a neutral galvanized finish so as to not draw attention to the structure. No other unique natural features have been noted on this site. The property is level and requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use which maximizes energy efficiency and convenience. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Section 18.164 (Streets and Utilities) contains development standards for streets and utilities. The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has proposed only to extend electrical service and may need to extend water service to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities to the site. V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and had no comments or concerns. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 6 . • • • • • Mt 010021•00 •111111 MI I m 410 wu11 I QM I 1111 10 WO MIN L1.11 o IMO —his =. E21-4 . ''I :. h h`; •i#'i Dr 4\4V * :'�erya y:�{. 9 ..R s : ' _ hhhh,'7�1 ,, 0 .... 477h�i ... IM — O — • TVPIC*L WE SECTION 001101 Q ° i� ° s ar Z • ®ate,. �a.ui °en°0ry J • 11411+ r. NIA 1 1 ,• 1 1 Mil 00 0 a • 5 7 r r CC I 1 1 1 � r Q 1 1 00 I I a..a i s a 5 i • s •�,. — ` , 1 01= if I0:00 • `tee 001 .e •o[ . ••17® WM 0 LI- IOOO A i0 10010 ..100.• 01 111012 mow= O.s O I.t4 00010 1E o .OQ. wIO Ym .M. 10 ma. NE SET Tin 'i '.. _ .1 _ E mil _ 0 PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP CUP 96 - Western PCS Corp. Monopole • • ' : 1 I _. a 1 1 I 1 1 l ; 1 1 \ t r. LJJ ---,_ }+ FIR LP Ej N II I 0 .4 1 I SNNnRI IR(, s., ai 1 I a_ a) 3 0 TFr L_ (rFNYTER 0) CT — PaR > C � al a. IV \ L t CO 0) ill\ _____! I-- 4-- o >N ----_. f BOMTARD lopl k if,, U Vicinity ty Map CUP 96 -0001 Western PCS Corp. Monopole Note: Map is not to scale N • EXHIBIT B Notice of Final Order by the Hearing's Officer Western PCS Corporation 3/25/96 Public Hearing 7535 -B NE Ambassador Place CUP 96 -0001 Western PCS Monopole Tower Portland OR 97201 Page 1 of 1 Irwin Schimmel 14020 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard OR 97223 CITY OF TIGARD PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 FILE TITLE: WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation OWNER: Irwin Schimmel 7535B NE Ambassador 14020 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, OR 9720, Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 284 -8714 a' (503) 620 -1235 REQUEST: The applicant requests Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). ZONE: Light Industrial (I -L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY STAFF DECISION _ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: 3/25/96 TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER _ STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639 -4171 x317 CUP 96 -0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS ( , Lt) / 1 1 2 7 / )7/1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY CASE NO. Gvf / 6, "-0-00 l OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO. APPLICATION ACCEPTEIPSO DATE: pia-996 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted: PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION ` 4 pplication form (1) 14020 S.W. 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR. 97224 (B) Owner's signature /written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. authorization 2S1 1DD 800 (C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE approximately 8 acres --- ;//;(D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER* Irwin Schimmel 1 ,/ - (E) Site plan (pre - app.checklist) ADDRESS 14020 SW 72nd Avenue PHONE 620- 1235 ✓ (F) Applicant's statement CITY Tigard, OR. ZIP 97224 (pre -app. checklist) APPLICANT* WPstprn PCS rnrpnratinn h 0 (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS 7535B NE Ambassador PHONE 284-8714 addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY Portland, OR. ZIP 97220 L' fee (1365) *When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE ET 1ED TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written 2 0 authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL D CISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. P /ONE DESIGNATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY � � The owners of record of the subject property request conditional use approval to allow To construct an unmannP.d rP1 1 ul ar Hearings Officer Approval Date: communications tower. Final Approval Date: • Planning Engineering 0736P/23P Rev'd: 3/88 3. List any variance, sensitive lands permit, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: conditional use permit 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this -262 tk day of Jp -.1 19 9 SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property. /// / ; ;;;21 ��. tir (KSL:pm /0736P) •. •' A f City of Tigard, Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING Y STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: that am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ( 5--, 2 16 ---- -,q4, (Check box above, N applicable) (check appropriate box below} (Enter Public Hearing Date above) O City of Tigard Planning Director y Tigard Planning Commission Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: (Cheek box above, it applicable) City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) FINAL ORDER FOR: (Check box above, it applicable) (check appropriate box below} O City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission O Tigard Hearings Officer O Tigard City Council ❑ That 1 served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION /NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of • is attached, marked Exhibit "A ", was mOed to eac . - a ed pers•n(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached ist(s), marked Exhibi ': , th- 7 i da •f JA �� 199 6O , and deposited in the U ited St. :. on t - _ � t� day • /A/ 199 - , postage prepaid. '. ,J.�y �. Ih 1 i,_,..gall4c Or a 'red Notice 0 , At Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the /7 day of /„ "`.. , 16 I.''l. OFFICIAL SEAL at ,: � _ DIANE M JELDERKS / /, . r„ NOTARY PUBLIC- OREGON i . �L ° . COMMISSION COMMISSION NO. 046142 NOTARY PUBLI' o F OREGON MY COMMSSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 ' My Commissio pires: 7 7 If :iFI4 NFO.: n Ce T . 7 2 / M�y CASE NO.(S): e qY -0t0/ ((„ TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: • 4111 EXHIBIT A • �7� J CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER. AT A MEETING ON MONDAY. MARCH 25. 1996 AT 7:00 PM. IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER. 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD. TIGARD. OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 FILE TITLE: WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Westem PCS Corporation OWNER: Irwin Schimmel 7535B NE Ambassador 14020 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 284 -8714 (503) 620 -1235 REQUEST > The applicant requests Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: Light Industrial (I -L). • THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC , HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER CUP 960001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 3125/96 HEARINGS OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDIXIQ1 S AL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATIONS IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER MARCH 4. 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NQ CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (256) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25G) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. NINE ihnimi INFER *6. anallilk rw- •., . ins 111111 CUP 96 -0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 3/25/96 HEARINGS OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING CUP 96 -0001 WESTERN PCS . MONOPOLE (Page 1 /1) EXHIBIT B 2S 101 DD -00702 - J & K PROPERTIES CORP 6900 SW SANDBURG RD a TIGARD, OR 97223 I 2S101DD -01000 2S112AB -00100 LEEK, GEORGE W MT HOOD CHEMICAL CORP 1515 SE HAWTHORNE 4444 NW PEON PORTLAND, OR 97214 PORTLAND, OR 97210 2S101DD -00701 2S101DD -00800 RFD PUBLICATIONS, INC SCHIMMEL, IRWIN 9600 SW BOECKMAN 14020 SW 72ND AVE WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 TIGARD, OR 97224 2S112AA -00900 2S101DD -00900 SPIEKER PROPERTIES LP TARKIAINEN, REINO J PO BOX 5909 MARILYN J PORTLAND, OR 97228 2089 EBEAU RD ERWOOD, OR 97140 2S101 DD -00703 2S101 DD -01001 TARKIAINEN, REINO J A AND TIGARD, CITY OF MARILYN J 13125 SW 20895 SW LEBEAU RD PO 23397 SHERWOOD, OR 97140 T ARD, OR 97223 2S112AB -00600 2S10100-00600 TUFFORD, PHYLLIS J TRUSTEE WESTERN FAMILY HOLDING INC BY VERN TUFFORD PO BOX 4057 EASTSIDE VAN & STORAGE CO PORTLAND, OR 97208 4836 SE POWELL BLVD PORTLAND, OR 97206 Western PCS Corporation 2S112AA -01000 7535B NE AMBASSADOR WILLIAMS CONTROLS INDUSTRIES, PORTLAND OR 97201 ATTN: DALE J NELSON 14100 SW 72ND AVE PORTLAND, OR 97224 , - . • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ) 1, ti ■ CLIC.1 Z■rr. do,- f , being duly sworn, depose and say that on , 19312_, 1 caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached list a notice of a m e e t i n g t o d i s c u s s a p r o p o s e d d e v e l o p m e n t a t / VO 2 . 0 . SCA) 72: A ‘ie..-1, i.e._ ____, a copy of which notice so marled is attached hereto and Made a part of hereof. ..- 1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at 76 V o APT. r- t\- et with postage prepaid thereon. Signature / Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 D I day of jaihuar ty , 19 T6' . / // ET;----: N ci wi : .,,y i :I.N.. f .:1- 47 i) N Public . 1\ erj4 . ICA-M 1 § 24:5e :/ ) kiT C;,;?i::C.F.iDECEM=S1 3, 1SE9 c Lac=... My Commission Expires: . -- liAloginyo\affmaileit . . - . • • KOLL THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES COMPANY TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES December 28, 1995 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard, Oregon 97223 Koll Telecommunications 7535 B N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, Oregon 97220 Dear Mr. Stevens: The Western PCS Corporation is in the process of establishing a new cellular phone system in the Portland Metropolitan Area. This system uses new digital technology to provide a higher quality of wireless communication. To better serve your area, Western PCS has proposed an unmanned communication facility, including a 100 foot monopole, on the Power Rents property located at 14020 SW 72nd Avenue in Tigard. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, Westem PCS would like to discuss the proposed facility in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on: Wednesday, January 24, 1996 7:00 p.m. Tigard City Hall Red Rock Creek Room 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 If you have any questions regarding this meeting, please call Mike Birndorf at 284 -8714. Western PCS looks forward to serving you and your community in the near future. Sincerely, Mike Birndorf Koll Telecommunications 75358 N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -8714 FAX (503) 288 -5741 • CFI Y OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (CIT'S) NOTIFICATION UST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE ( r EAST-CIT" */ SOUTH CIT I CENTRAL CIT Abdullah Alkadi Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude ary Swintek ack Biethan Brian Martin 11905 SW 125th Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain Rd 15 SW Frewing, #23 5525 SW 109Th Ave 10965 SW Pathfinder Way Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 igard, OR 97223 igard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 -3930 (5011 524 1068 15011 5 24 0994 (50)) 619.2529 ohn Benneth Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith raig Hopkins 1550 SW 109th Ave 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Court 7430 SW Varns Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 524 6125 15011524 4550 (5011 619 -0894 Kathie Kallio Christy Herr Linda Masters 12940 SW Glacier Lily Dr 11386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenue Mark F. Mahon Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 11310 SW 91st Court (501) 5745200 1501) 590- 1970115011624 8009 (50116204662 Tigard, OR 97223 Ed 1 low(len Barbara Salller Scott Russell 11829 SW Morning Hill 11245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Roa Joel Slovens Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Scappoose, OR 97056 9660 SW Ventura Court (50115246040 15011684.9303 15031541 -2434 Tigard, OR 97223 Bonne & Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Woolery 14447 SW Twekesbury Dr 15949 SW 146111 Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court Pat Wyden Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 8122 SW Spruce Street 15011 590 0461 (503) 590 0523 (5031590.4297 Tigard, OR 97223 NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings on land use proposals In the West CIT area shall be sent to all the names on this list. • at lNmasl erslcltnotk.mst • 1 95 r ' te r: Allison • .<o11 Tele- Communications By: RFD PUBLICATIONS INC Reino J A Tarkiainen 9600 SW Boeckman Rd J Marilyn WESTERN FAMILY HOLDING I Wilsonville, OR 20895 SW Lebeau Rd PO Box 4057 97070 -9242 Sherwood, OR 97140 -8719 Portland, OR 97208 -4057 BIG T INVESTMENTS J & K PROPERTIES CORP FOUGHT & COMPANY INC 2314 SE Park Crest Ave 6900 SW Sandburg Rd PO Box 23759 Vancouver, WA Tigard, OR 97223 -8039 Tigard, OR 97281 -3759 98684 -8533 . . . • . • . . • • • • • • s N . ***; *•••*: — —: *: ••• * . * . • . . . . : . . . . . — ***** • • • .••••.... .. . -....,•4 '' . . • ... . . . . ... . .. .. • , . , • . . . • • . . . • . . • . • . . . . . • . . .. . . . • .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . • . . • • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . ..,..• . ... .. .• : • • . . :.... . . , ... .. . :. . . . . . .... . . . . .. . . ., , ...,••• • , . :-....., .: . . .• .. . 1 4 ....:: . . . . .**. .. . . . • , . *. i . . .* X .. . .. . . : :: -..• • • . . . . . . . * .• *.• ,. . . . . **** .. . .. : . ::: • Pt') * . . . . . . , • * *: . .. . .. .. .. . • • . . . — . ... . . . . . ., .. • . t • . • — . * • . . . . . •• . . .. • * * . .., ., — . 5 ...6 ••• ... ***.:: • • . • i . .• . • .— . .... .,...,-0 ... i : .......1 .. . „ . ••••••" ••• •••••• .. . . .. ...... • • • . . • . • -:•;: . . • . • . . . . . •• i •••.::: : .. • . , • . . ...-... ... ,.... . . 7.:. . . .. . ,. . .. . ..., .. . . ••••... '. ? ..... . . . . , . . . . • „ ..1 • . , . .. . 0 ....,.: . . . . .... . • . ' .. • • • : .• • . . • :. ....• •*•.!• . ... . .. . . . . . . • .1 . z • i. ..., . . 1„:. . . ...$ . .. ..... . ••• . •:„..: . . . . , • . ::: ..• •• ...... , .. , •• .i.,•• • •• ••• •• •• •• .• . .. . • 0 ...• . .. . ... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .... 4..., . .. : : . , .• .. A . . . • , ... . . . . . . . . , . . .. : . :. . . .. •!••:.: •'‘' ...: ... • . . . . . . . . .. . .. ... . • • . . . . .... ... • • .. :' i . • . . : . . . . • :, ' ' - • . . . • . ... . . • • . .• . . . . . • t . ir •••••• .. . . • . . . . . . . . .. . • . . KOLL THE REAL ESTATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES SERVICES COMPANY Mark Roberts Associate Planner City of Tigard Planning Department 13125 Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Roberts Enclosed are revised site plans for the cellular site on 72nd Avenue. These plans have been modified to reflect the conditions of approval that were outlined in the staff report and addressed at the hearing on March 25th. A landscape buffer has been added to the east side of the lease area and the site will be surrounded by a view - obscuring fence. All landscaping is drought resistant and Western PCS will provide monthly landscaping maintenance. All landscaping is wholly enclosed within the lease area. Finally, the plans have • been modified to show that areas accommodating service vehicles are paved. See attached plans. Please contact me should you desire additional information. Thanks for your excellent help throughout this process. Best Regards, Michael Birndorf 7535B N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 - 8714 FAX (503) 288 -5741 • • 0 MEETING NOTICE Western PCS Corporation is proposing the development of a 100 foot monopole for cellular communication purposes at this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, Western PCS would like to discuss the proposal in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 1996 7:00 PM TIGARD CITY HALL RED ROCK CREEK ROOM 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD,OR 97223 Project Contact: Mike Birndorf, Koll Telecommunications Phone Number: 284 -8714 -S6 -749 /).-i S 000 taws?' 7' P' /W.-//°/./ • 9'467 7t z cyv/ 4.y lO), W 7 V9 7/ ez.290 ,drwi✓uiZ) a/9 tool St/ zeir) 4t gaibifi • CITY OF TIGARD • PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES } NON - RESIDENTIAL �4,,, ;IK(' I CITY OF TIGARD DATE: r I Z- i Z 4q STAFF: APPLICANT: - 2Ste.v P65 - 670. AGENT: �o 1l 6°t n444/G 4l—t ale- G Ya,ve5 /" �11 -w Phone: ( ) Phone: ( 1 2 titi PROPERTY LOCATION ADDRESS: U / l) 2 3 5 72 la ie 14 ut.Q._ TAX MAPITAX LOT: DD — ray. f 4 26v) NECESSARY APPLICATION(S): e a 14d dial Re&v PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: I • • !' • a l r0 , , COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: L � �1 TvtatU /Nfcz/ �L-. ZONING DESIGNATION: Li I, J14414 !4 (- 1 Z .-- CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT FACILITATOR: • 5 TEAM AREA: PHONE: (503) ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS I �-- Minimum lot size: fl/4 sq. ft. Average lot width: 570 ft. Maximum bui ding height: S1/ ft� r GIe � Setbacks: front �(3 ft. side it q ft. rear n/4 ft. corner n 4 ft. from street. Maximum site coverage: 4 % Minimum landscaped or natural vegetation ar a: J % (Refer to Code Section 18. ) ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSIONAL REQUIRE NTS Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot l created through the minor land partition process. Lots created as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or ve a minimum 15 foot wide access easement. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 6 NON-Residential applicationlPlanning Department Section The depth of all lots shall not ce•Y: times the average width, unless the parc less than 11/2 times the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 ts) SPECIAL SETBACKS (AI - 72k • Streets: 30 feet f om the centerline of S 7 • Established areas: feet from . • Lower intensity zones: 'i l feet, along the site's boundary. • Flag lot: 10 foot side yard setback. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.040 and 18.96) SPECIAL BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS Building Height Exceptions - Buildings located in a non - residential zone may be built to a height of 75 feet provided: • A maximum building floor area to site area ratio (FAR) of 1.5 to 1 will exist; • All actual building setbacks will be at least Y2 (half) of the building's height; and • The s ructure will not abut a residential zone distri t. 6/41/e5. 614e. , (Refer to Code Sec ion 18.98.020) PARKING AND ACCESS Parking shown on preliminary plan(s): Required parking for this type of use: Secondary use required parking: A/9 No more than 0% of required spaces may be designated andlor dimensioned as compact spaces. Parking stalls shall be dimensioned as follows: • Stan .rd parking space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft. • Compa parking space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft. (Refer to Code Section 18.1 c 6.020) • Handicapped pa ing: All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and dimensioned disabled person parking spaces. The minimum numbe of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the Americans with Disab - ties Act (AOA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space su ace and an appropriate sign shall be posted. Bicycle racks are required for multi - family, commercial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be located in areas protected from automobile traffic and in convenient locations Bicycle parking spaces shall be provided on the basis of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces. Minimum number of accesses: Minimum access width: Minimum pavement width: A ll driveways and parking areas, except for some fleet storage arking ar eas, must be paved. Drive -in use queuing areas: (Refer to Code Section 18.106 and 18.108) \ CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 6 NON- Residential applicationlPlaming Department Section WALKWAY REQUIREME Walkways shall exten rom the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, a industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections betwe buildings in multi - building commercial, institutional, and industrial compleses. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed b een a new develpment and neighboring developments. (Refer to Code Section 18.108.050) • LOADING AREA REQUIREME 1 Every commercial or industri. building in excess of 10,000 square feet shall be provided with a loading space. The space size and location shall be as approved b the City Engineer. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.071 190 CLEAR VISION AREA The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in height at road/driveway, roadlrailroad, and roadlroad intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification. (Refer to Code Section 18.102) BUFFERING AND SCREEIW4IG In order to increase pr.Oacy and to either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts between adjacent developments, especially between differei land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in• terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a lance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable e n if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences, utilities, and walkways. Additi al information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Community Development Code. (Refer to Code Chap r 18.100) The required buffer widths which are applicable \o your proposal area are as follows: 4 ft. along north boundary. ft. along east boundary. a ft. along south boundary. nn � ft. along west boundary. In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along 1 S 4ccz/d 102 1d.es iiecJ t, Item) K Vic 1oack va cis I' 4 s fOsse4(e. ANDSCAPING Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right -of -way or on private property within six feet of the right -of -way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade S °: eet trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturit Fu, :;per information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed informatio on design requirements for parking areas and accesses. ' •fer to Code Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108) CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 6 NON-Residential applicationlPlanning Department Section SIGNS Sign permits must be obtained prior installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign a or height beyond Code standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alt atively, a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for review before the Hearings • Officer. (Refer to Code Section 18.114) SENSITIVE LANDS The Code provi regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to areas within the 100 -year floodplain, natural drainagewa , wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent, or on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to preliminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the pre - application conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the responsibility to precisely identify sensits lands areas, and their boundaries, is the responsibility of the applicant. Areas meeting the definitions of sensitive lands must be clearly indicated on plans submitted with the development application. Chapter 18.84 also provides regul ti ons for the use, protection, or modification of sensitive lands areas. Residential development is prohibited within floodplains. In m stases, dedication of 100 -year floodplain areas to the City for park and open space areas is required as a condition of the approval ota development application. . (Refer to Code Section 18.84) \ . NARRATIVE The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. Failure to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. (Refer to Code Section 18.32) CODE SECTIONS 18.80 18.98 18.114 18.150 18.84 i 0 18.116 18.160 18.88 18.102 0 18.162 18.92 18.106 130 8.164 18.96 18.108 18.134 } NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator and the members of any land use subcommittee(s) of their proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application or the application will not be accepted. RECYCLING Applicant s ou0 contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with Pride Disposal's vehicles. CONTACT PERSON Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177. (Refer to Code Section 18. CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 6 NON- Residential applicationiPlanning Department Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENT • ; #2.) 14 p LLL, t / c 6 J Clue_ v'e L vei/ r - y- i e5 �� r PROCEDURE Admi istrative staff review. lic hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer. Public hearing before the Planning Commission. Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hail offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications. Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays or 4:30 on other days. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch by 11 inch map of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 6 NON-Residential applicationiPlanning Department Section • . The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20 day public period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard �l o. or( . A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is available from the Planni g Division upon request. This pre - application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. .PLEAS < l am The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects of good site planning that should apply to the development of your site ............................... plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. Additional pre - application conference(s) islare required if an application(s) islare to be submitted more than six months following this pre - application conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division. PREPARED BY: V,//44 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 1503) 639 -4171 FAX: (503) 684 -7297 h: lloginlpattylmasterslpreapptmst (Engineering Section: masterslpreappt.eng) CITY OF TIGARD Pre - Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 6 NON-Residential applicationlPlanning Department Section • CITY OF TIGARD • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 41,1 APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TIGARD • The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application. See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard Planning Division at (503) 639 -4171. Staff: 1/14I3�P 1/ Date: /VIZ I APPLICATION & RELATED DOCUMENT(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ./ MARKED ITEMS A) Application form (1 copy) B) Owner's signature/written authorization m� C) Title transfer instrument/or grant deed [� D) Applicant's statement No. of Copies 2-0 E) Filing Fee $ - 3A5 I SITE - SPECIFIC MAP(S) /PLAN(S) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ,/ MARKED ITEMS I A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies 2C 1. Vicinity map m/ 2. Site size & dimensions 3. Contour lines (2 ft at 0 -10% or 5 ft for grades > 10 %) 4. Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds m� 5. Locations of natural hazard areas including: ❑ (a) Floodplain areas ❑ (b) Slopes in excess of 25% ❑ (c) Unstable ground ❑ (d) Areas with high seasonal water table ❑ (e) Areas with severe soil erosion potential ❑ (f) Areas having severely weak foundation soils ❑ 6. Location of resource areas as shown on the Comprehensive Map Inventory including: ❑ (a) Wildlife habitats ❑ (b) Wetlands ❑ 7. Other site features: (a) Rock outcroppings ❑ (b) Trees with 6" + caliper measured 4 feet from ground level ❑ 8. Location of existing structures and their uses 9. Location Location and type of on and off-site noise sources ems 10. Location of existing utilities and easements 11. Location of existing dedicated right -of -ways m/ LAND USE APPLICATION J UST PAGE 1 OF 5 B) Site Development Pin indicating: � o of Copies 7 0 1. The proposed site and surrounding properties 2. Contour line intervals ❑ 3. The location, dimensions and names of all: (a) Existing & platted streets & other public ways and easements on the site and on adjoining properties ❑ (b) Proposed streets or other public ways & easements on the site ❑ (c) Alternative routes of dead end or proposed streets that require future extension ❑ 4. The location and dimension of: (a) Entrances and exits on the site (b) Parking and circulation areas v/ (c) Loading and services area (d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation ❑ (e) Outdoor common areas ❑ • (f) Above ground utilities ca/ 5. The location, dimensions & setback distances of all: (a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and easements which are located on the site and on adjacent property within 25 feet of the site (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements on the site 6. Storm drainage facilities and analysis of downstream conditions ❑ 7. Sanitary sewer facilities 8. The location areas to be landscaped m� 9. The location and type of outdoor lighting considering crime prevention techniques � 10. The location of mailboxes ❑ 11. The location of all structures and their orientation 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑ C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The site development plan shall include a grading plan at the same scale as the site analysis drawings and shall contain the following information: 1. The location and extent to which grading will take place indicating: (a) General contour lines ❑ (b) Slope ratios ❑ (c) Soil stabilization proposal(s) ❑ (d) Approximate time of year for the proposed site development ❑ 2. A statement from a registered engineer supported by data factual substantiating: (a) Subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering report ❑ (b) The validity of sanitary sewer and storm drainage service proposals ❑ (c) That all problems will be mitigated and how they will be mitigated ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION / UST PAGE 2 OF 5 D) Architectural Draw 2- s Indicating: gro. of Copies ( - The site developmeni, plan proposal shall include: 1. Floor plans indicating the square footage of all structures proposed for use on -site 2. Typical elevation drawings of each structure E) Landscape Plan Indicating: No. of Copies The landscape plan shall be drawn at the same scale of the site analysis plan or a larger scale if necessary and shall indicate: 1. Description of the irrigation system where applicable 2. Location and height of fences, buffers and screenings 3. Location of terraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces o 4. Location, type, size and species of existing and proposed plant materials 5. Landscape narrative which also addresses: (a) Soil conditions ❑ (b) Erosion control measures that will be used ❑ F) Si_n Dra :s: ❑ Sign drawi :s shall be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18.114 of the Code :s part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining a Building Pe mit to construct a sign. G) Traffic Generati in Estimate: ❑ H) Prelimina Partiti.n /Lot Line Ad'ustment Ma. Indicatin:: No. of Copies 1. The owner of th - subject parcel ❑ 2. The owner's auth ' rized agent ❑ 3. The map scale (20, 0,100 or 200 feet -1) inch north arrow and date ❑ 4. Description of parc‘4l location and boundaries 0 5. Location, width and ames of streets, easements and other public ways within and adjacent to the parcel ❑ 6. Location of all permaneht buildings on and within 25 feet of all property lines \ ❑ 7. Location and width of all ater courses ❑ 8. Location of any trees within ,6" or greater caliper at 4 feet above around level ❑ 9. All slopes greater than 25% \ ❑ 10. Location of existing utilities and utility easements ❑ 11. For major land partition which c? ates a public street: (a) The proposed right -of -way location and width ❑ (b) A scaled cross - section of the p oposed street plus any reserve strip ❑ 12. Any applicable deed restrictions ❑ 13. Evidence that land partition will not pr Jude efficient future land division where applicable ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION / UST PACE 3 OF 5 I) ' ubdivision Prelimi t Plat Ma. and Data Indicatin:: 40 .J . o. of Copies 1. Scale equaling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one • hase per sheet ❑ 2. e proposed name of the subdivision ❑ 3. Vi..nity map showing property's relationship to arterial and col I:ctor streets 0 • 4. Name • addresses and telephone numbers of the owner, developer, engine- , surveyer and designer (as applicable) ❑ 5. Date of ..plication ❑ 6. Boundary ines of tract to be subdivided a 7. Names of as jacent subdivision or names of recorded owners of adjoining pa cels of un- subdivided land a 8. Contour lines elated to a City- established benchmark at 2 -foot intervals for 0 -10% gra• -s greater than 10% a 9. The purpose, Io, ation, type and size of all the following (within and adjacent to the p oposed subdivision): (a) Public and p ivate right -of -ways and easements 0 (b) Public and p 'vate sanitary and storm sewer lines ❑ (c) Domestic wat r mains including fire hydrants ❑ (d) Major power t lephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) ❑ (e) Watercourses ❑ (f) Deed reservation for parks, open spaces, pathways and other • land encumbranc s 0 10. Approximate plan and p ofiles of proposed sanitary and storm sewers with grades and pipe siz indicated on the plans ❑ 11. Plan of the proposed wate distribution system, showing pipe sizes and the location of valves and fie hydrants a 12. Approximate centerline profi s showing the finished grade of all streets including street extensions for reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision 0 13. Scaled cross sections of propose street right -of- way(s) ❑ 14. The location of all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow ❑ 15. Location, width & direction of flow f all water courses & drainage -ways ❑ 16. The proposed lot configurations, app ximate lot dimensions and lot numbers. Where lots are to be u for purposes other than residential, it shall be indicated upon su h lots. 0 17. The location of all trees with a diameter : inches or greater measured at 4 feet above ground level, and the locatio of proposed tree plantings 0 18. The existing uses of the property, including e location of all structures and the present uses of the structures, and a s atement of which structures are to remain after platting a 19. Supplemental information including: (a) Proposed deed restrictions (if any) ❑ (b) Proof of property ownership a (c) A proposed plan for provision of subdivision i 'provements 0 20. Existing natural features including rock outcroppings, wetla , ds & marsh areas ❑ 21. If any of the foregoing information cannot practicably • - shown on the preliminary plat, it shall be incorporated into a narrativ- and submitted with the application ❑ LAND USE APPLICATION V LIST PACE 4 OF 5 • • J) Solar Access Calculations: 0 K) Other Information No. of Copies 5 Gt/ Wed. l 'lt ti Gam' 1444.7 o v� co 14 <<e� v1 I Df -- 1 N <}f4 f ia,w0& 5 4ou 10.2.. �GvJ 2G� h:Uogin`pattylmastersU< ist.mst May 23, 1995 LAND USE APPLICATION LIST PAGE 5 OF 5 LAIC USE APPLICATION FEE SCH•LE APPEALS Director's Decision to Planning Commission 235.00 costs Planning Commission /Hearings Off. to Council 315.00 + transcript BLASTING PERMITS 125.00 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSING Text only, Ma • onl or both CONDI • ' • 1 E PROCESSING Conditional U • 365.00 F : SETBACK STANDARDS 80.00 HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT 80.00 HOME OCCUPATION TYPE I 10.00 TYPE 1I 50.00 INTERPRETATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 55.00 by Community Development Department LAND PARTITION Residential and Non - residential 235.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 50.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING Conceptual and detailed plan review 500.00 SENSITIVE LANDS Flood plain 520.00 Wetlands /Steep slopes /Drainageway 235.00 SIGN CODE EXCEPTIONS 230.00 SIGN PERMIT 0 -24 sq. ft. 10.00 24 -100 sq. ft 25.00 100 + sq. ft. 35.00 Temporary signs 10.00 each sign SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Under $10,000 80.00 $10,000 - $99,999 155.00 $100,000 - $499,999 315.00 $500,000 - $999,999 415.00 $1,000,000 or more 520.00 +$1 per$10,000 SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT 415.00 + $5 /LOT Subdivision Variance, if needed 105.00 TEMPORARY USE Director's Decision 50.00 Special exemption /Non- Profit -0- TREE REMOVAL PERMIT -0- VACATIONS Streets and public access 300.00 deposit - actual costs charged VARIANCE Administrative 80.00 Sign Code 230.00 ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATIONS Less than 10 acres 520.00 10 acres or more 625.00 ZONE CHANGE PROCESSING Less than 10 acres 520.00 10 acres or more 625.00 ZONE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 310.00 JOINT APPLICATION PLANNING FEE 100% of highest planning fee plus 10% of all additional planning fees related to the proposal. Approved by City Council Effective 2/1/91 H:1LOG I NI D S TS I F E E S C H E D • • KOLL THE REAL ESTATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES SERVICES COMPANY PZe December 7, 1995 Mark Roberts "p /n &- Associate Planner k pp4Cf./Jie City of Tigard 13125 S.W. Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR. 97223 Project Background The Western PCS Corporation is in the process of establishing a new cellular phone system in the Portland Metropolitan area. In March of 1995, the Western PCS Corporation purchased six licenses from the Federal Communication Commission, including one for the Portland Metropolitan area. These licenses allow Western PCS to operate a new cellular telephone system called Personal Communication Services (PCS). PCS uses new digital technology to produce a higher quality transfer of voices and data than the older analog/digital hybrid systems that are currently being used by local cellular companies. One of our proposed transmitter /antenna sites is located in Tigard at 14020 S.W. 72nd Avenue. This site is presently occupied by Power Rents. The proposed facility will be located in the north -east corner of the site near the I -5 freeway. Approximately four - hundred feet will be leased for the proposed facility. This lease area will include a one - hundred foot monopole outfitted at the top with a maximum of nine antenna panels and one or more small microwave dishes. Each antenna panel would be mounted vertically on three support beams. The beams extend approximately two feet from the sides of the free - standing pole. In addition, there will be four forest -green steel equipment cabinets, each measuring fifty -two inches in height, and occupying a space ten feet long by thirty inches wide. These cabinets will be mounted on a concrete pad next to the monopole structure. The entire facility will be surrounded by a six foot high view obscuring chain link fence. Attached is a site plan and elevation of the proposed facility for your review. I look forward to meeting with you on Tuesday. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to call me at 284 -8714. Sincerely, 7/"7 75358 N.E. Ambassador Place Michael Birndorf Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -8714 FAX (503) 288 -5741 • 1 0 e ),L J Ej Z .1/ I C SANDBURG ST I as a. . a) \..... 0 4S101DD -00701 \SloID7 04 48101 DDA0800 4S 101 DD -00707 C C 4S 01 D 00 48101 DD 00700 CO 4E 101 DD -0100 4SI0I00-01000 O_.. \ 4SI 12AB-00100 7 4SI14AA -01000 CO 4S114A11.00900 - 48114A6.00000 • ■ II O a \\\ c • — , (....) 1 ---- 1 .• _ Vicinity Map NO 1 WICATION MAP CUP 96 -0001 • • phi _ CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: February 27. 1996 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 > WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE _ Q _ A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). ZONE: Light Industrial (l -L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 7. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ('lease provide thefolrawing information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS . . ttiP qc ( INQUEST FOR COM E 4. NOTIFICATION UST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPUCATIONS .. ..... ..... .:... ....... nnrzt (circle one} _ CIT Area: (W) (S) (E) (C) ® Placed for review in Library C17 Book w I• . V BLDG. DEPT./David Scott, tRLading Official CE DEPT. /Kelley Jennings, Ctkr.e Ne.er+b. OM= _ OJlRATIONS /John Acker, tom+. s . . _ CITY ADMIN. /Cathy Wheatley, CityRetadn _ ENG. DEPT. /Brian Roger. o+Re.�..,e �OM.OEV. DEPT. /D.S.T. S ADV. PLNG. /Nadine Smith, tlay.iwsuoe+.tra WATER DEPT. /Michael Miller, ebaw. �o o e+ottomr.p.iovacsantwaea ;. •;::: > :: ::..::<: :: >:: >:::<:::; >:;:: :: ;: SPECIAL DISTRICT & : » >. >::: :: >::: '.::;: _ FIRE MARSHALL _ UNIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. Gene Birchell SWM Program /Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa. County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton. OR 97075 (pick -up box) Hillsboro, OR 97124 :::::.:.::....:;.:::.;;....:.;:.:;:;:.;::.::::.::.;::;::<.::::..;::.::::>:.;:.::.::::.:>:;:.; : >:AI�'�'C'I'�>D:I>fIIt15DI4'1' YON$:<;.;:::.::.:.;:.::;::.: ..;:.:::.:::...:;::.;;::.:;:.:: ;:.;.::<.::.::.:;. ;;.:.:;:;.;:::.:.,:•..:..:.:.: •..; ., WA. CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. _ METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _ METRO- GREENSPACES 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. #16, Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro, OR 97124 • Portland, OR 97232 - 2109 600 NE Grand Avenue { Portland, OR 97232 -2736 _ Brent Curtis (CPA's) _ STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION _ Jim Tice (IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ ODOT /REGION 1 _ Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Trans. Planning _ Scott King (CPA's) Portland. OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders _ Tom Harry (Current Planning App's) P nd, OR 97209 -4037 _ Lynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) _ OREGON DLCD (CPA's /ZOA's) 1175 Court Street. N.E. _ ODOT/REGION 1. DISTRICT 2 -A _ CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem. OR 97310-0590 Bob Schmidt /Engineering Coord. Larry Conrad. Senior Planner 2131 SW Scholls/PO Box 25412 PO Box 4755 _CITY OF PORTLAND Portland, OR 97225 Beaverton. OR 97076 Planning Director 1120 SW 5th _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO _CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland. OR 97204 City Manager Mike Matteucci, Neighborhood Coordinator PO Box 369 PO Box 4755 _ CITY OF DURHAM Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager PO Box 23483 _ CITY OF KING CITY _ CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard. OR 97281 -3483 City Manager PO Box 369 15300 SW 116th Tualatin, OR 97062 T OTHER King City, OR 97224 • ;:::.: .;:•.::: : : : : :: < > >::; :: > : >:::: >:::: SPECIAL AGENCIB : :';: . :.- . : ::.. :.:: > :> • ......; :r ?: ::::: :: :;;;; :s:: _ GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _ PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _ COLUMBIA CABLE CO. Elaine Self, Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard, OR 97281-3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton, OR 97005 _ NW NATURAL GAS CO. ph.: cam) 721440 _ METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _ TRI -MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT Scott Palmer ray (I103) 721-2502 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox. Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97209 -3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland, OR 97232 Beaverton, OR 97006 -4886 _ TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS _ SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO. - Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Forney, PLS- Project Eng. 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave., Room 324 Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Union Station Portland, OR 97209 ;:.::..::::::.::,,.:,.:...:: :. .! : : ; > : ,j : :. . . • i; ii i` . ::'!<'>;:: , :; . ; : : :. : .. :: . ::»`:::;.: : ::: : ? < >:;.i:;>;: »`;: < > . SPATE AGENCIE8.::- : :.:. : :: .:: .:... . : . .. . . . : _> :;.. ::..::.. >: PEDEQAL:A�iENCI) S> :.: { _ AERONAUTICS DIVISION (ODOT) _ DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _ US POSTAL SERVICE _ COMMERCE DEPT. -M.H. PARK _ FISH & WILDUFE Randy Hammock. Growth Cord. _ PUC _ DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY Portland, OR 97229 -9998 • _OTHER _ U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS hAlogh \PanYVnastenVcnotie.mst • • CUP 1 11 January 1996 City of Tigard Planning Division Attn: Mark Roberts 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Alison Smith Koll Telecommunications 7535B NE Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 Dear Mr. Roberts: Please find the enclosed signed affidavits for mailing and posting notices. They are in reference to the conditional use permit application by Western PCS Corporation for the development of a cellular communications tower at 14020 SW 72nd Avenue. If you have any questions, please call me at 284 -8714. Thank you. Sincerely, LS co T' Alison A. Smith Koll Telecommunications • • r 4 • . Name of applicant y � es 4 -r\ Subject Property: Tax Map and Lot # 23101 DD , Ta x Lc 8'O - 0 Address or General Location 1 L S t &) o 72-'4 A 1 r a,-at Q� AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE • i c,L a ( is cior-t do affirm that I am (represent) the party initiadng interest in a proposed Ion' /1 rPlljla, w-v affecting the lanei located at 1 `loZx .W 72 Ave--)u and did on the _a__ day of 1914 poaconally post Rod= indlmtirsg than the site may be proposed for a e o "of 4-,' d J ,9s r- ems•, -,; f application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 1 y 0 7X S( A.) 77: � i A l/e" j (state location on property) This io day of Cran /, is qk f- V r Signature Shed and swum to, affirmed. before me this la day of JtU1 r Y , 19 96 K;....:,; f\. rPc;t��YY Notary i• for the Stair) of Onion NOT11(�Y PU ^,�IGOREGON , Co ^!it�ISr.t2N No. 04226 My Commission Expires: /23� 19 r MY COMMISSION E;Pi1.1E3 DECEMBER 3,1999 } • WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard. OR loginVcApestreateit . . • • • • • AFFIDAVIT OF MAIUNG STATE OF OREGON ) SS CITY OF TIGARD ,, rl ; cLciqi &r 010 r• , being duly sworn, depose and say that on J y 1911 caused to have mailed to each of the persons on the attached fist a notice of a A • meeting to discuss a proposed development at / Vo 2,0 .S(A) 7Z — frt ______, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. 1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office at 7(a V1/40 ALem,-1- IA) ar, with postage prepaid thereon. Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this 10 day of ttar , 19 CFCAL SAL 4d,,, /4 CW:1ILY N Public NaTalIsplUotigORIC;2:1 My Commission Expires: MY COMMI§VON"EXPIRn DECEMBER 1.9e9 • hAloginyo\affmalcit • KOLL THE REAL ESTATE SERVICES COMPANY TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES December 28, 1995 Joel Stevens 9660 SW Ventura Court Tigard, Oregon 97223 Koll Telecommunications 7535 B N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, Oregon 97220 Dear Mr. Stevens: The Western PCS Corporation is in the process of establishing a new cellular phone system in the Portland Metropolitan Area. This system uses new digital technology to provide a higher quality of wireless communication. To better serve your area, Western PCS has proposed an unmanned communication facility, including a 100 foot monopole, on the Power Rents property located at 14020 SW 72nd Avenue in Tigard. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessary permits, Westem PCS would like to discuss the proposed facility in more detail with the surrounding property owners and residents. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on: Wednesday, January 24, 1996 7:00 p.m. Tigard City Hall Red Rock Creek Room 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, OR 97223 If you have any questions regarding this meeting, please call Mike Birndorf at 284 -8714. Western PCS looks forward to serving you and your community in the near future. Sincerely, Mike Bimdorf Koll Telecommunications 75356 N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -8714 FAX 1503) 288 -5741 • • • • en c aG +o te r: Allison xoll Tele- Communications • By: RFD PUBLICATIONS INC Reino J A Tarkiainen 9600 SW Boeckman Rd J Marilyn WESTERN FAMILY HOLDING I Wilsonville, OR 20895 SW Lebeau Rd PO Box 4057 97070 -9242 Sherwood, OR 97140 -8719 Portland, OR 97208 -4057 BIG T INVESTMENTS J & K PROPERTIES CORP FOUGHT & COMPANY INC 2314 SE Park Crest Ave 6900 SW Sandburg Rd PO Box 23759 Vancouver, WA Tigard, OR 97223 -8039 Tigard, OR 97281 -3759 98684 -8533 • CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT TEAMS (CIT'S) NOTIFICATION LIST FOR APPLICANTS WITH LAND USE PROPOSALS • WEST CIT LAND USE SUBCOMMITTEE t .EAS1 -CIT7 4/ SOUTH CIT I CENTRAL CIT A Alkali Clark G. Zeller Beverly Froude ary Swintek ack Biethan Brian Martin 11905 SW 125th Court 13290 SW Shore Drive 12200 SW Bull Mountain Rd 4 15 SW Frewing, #23 , 5525 SW 109th Ave 10965 SW Pathfinder Way Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 igard, OR 97223 igard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 -3930 15031524 1068 1500 5240994 (5011619 -2529 I ohn Benneth Bill Gross Larry Westerman Kathy Smith raig Hopkins 1550 SW 109111 Ave 11035 SW 135th Avenue 13665 SW Fern Street 11645 SW Cloud Court • 7430 SW Varns Street Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 15011 524 6125 15011524 4SSO (501) 6)9 -0894 • Kathie Kallio Christy Herr Linda Masters 12940 SW Glacier Lily Dr 1 1386 SW Ironwood Loop 15120 SW 141st Avenue Mark F. Mahon Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97224 11310 SW 91st Court 15011 524 5200 15011 590.19709501162.18009 15011 620 Tigard, OR 97223 Ed I lowden Barbara Sadler Scott Russell 11829 SW Morning Hill 11245 SW Morgen Court 31291 Raymond Creek Roa Joel Stevens Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Scappoose, OR 97056 9660 SW Ventura Court 15011124 6040 15011684 -9307 15011541.2414 Tigard, OR 97223 Bonne & Jim Roach June Sulffridge Cal Woolery 14447 SW Twekeshury Dr 15949 SW 146th Avenue 12356 SW 132nd Court Pat Wyden ligard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 8122 SW Spruce Street 15011 590 0461 15011 S900521 15011 590 -4297 I Tigard, OR 97223 • NOTE: In addition to property owners within 250 feet, notice of meetings on land use proposals In the West CIT area shall be sent to all the names on this list. alllnmaslerslcIlnollc.no* , • i '95 HQ.I ' le-g-- / f-.7 $0 • • KOLL THE REAL ESTATE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES SERVICES COMPANY January 23, 1996 City of Tigard, Oregon Community Development Department Planning Division 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97223 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ACTION: Requesting conditional use review to construct a cellular radio communications facility consisting of a one - hundred foot monopole structure and associated antennas. PROCEDURE TYPE: Quasi-judicial PROJECT ADDRESS/DESCRIPTION: Power Rents, 14020 SW 72nd Avenue, Tigard Oregon. Assessor Map/Lot #: 2S1 01DD/ 808. ZONING /COMP. PLAN: Light Industrial APPLICANT/REP: Western PCS Corporation, 7535 -B NE Ambassador Place, Portland, Oregon. Michael Birndorf/ Koll Telecommunication Services (284- 8714). PROPERTY OWNER: Irwin Schimmel 7535B N.E. Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 (503) 284 -8714 FAX (503) 288 -5741 • 2 • • Project Background The Western PCS Corporation is in the process of establishing a new cellular phone system in the Portland Metropolitan area. In March of 1995, the Western PCS Corporation purchased six licenses from the Federal Communications Commission, including one for the Portland Metropolitan area. These FCC licenses allow Western PCS to operate a new cellular telephone system called Personal Communication Services (PCS). The FCC determined that older analog/digital hybrid systems that are presently in use by local cellular companies are not adequate to accomodate current and future demand for wireless communication services. Unlike traditional cellular, PCS uses new digital technology to produce a higher quality transfer of voices and data. PCS cellular technology is the ideal way to accommodate increased communication traffic in a wireless fashion. One of our proposed transmitter /antenna sites is located at 14020 SW 72nd Avenue in Tigard. The approximately eight acre site presently contains Power Rents. The subject property is bordered by commercial and light industrial uses on all sides. The Interstate 5 freeway is located directly east of the subject property. The proposed facility will be located on the northern edge of the property and will be accessible via an existing paved driveway. See attached site plan for exact facility location. PCS site selection is based on a number of considerations related to height, terrain, distance from other cell sites, surrounding land uses and other technical factors. Western PCS radio frequency engineers utilize computer modeling and radio testing to determine potential sites. Local zoning and development criteria are also evaluated to identify which sites are most suitable from a land -use perspective. The subject property was identified as the best single site that meets radio and network engineering requirements and provides the least impact to the surrounding area. Live radio tests conducted at the subject property determined a structure height of one - hundred feet. Because cellular telephones require "line -of- site" between users and antenna, this is the minimum height necessary to avoid "hand -off' problems with neighboring cell sites located in West Portland, Tigard and Tualatin. This proposed facility is expected to provide cellular coverage to the Interstate 5 and Highway 217 corridors and surrounding areas. The signal emitted by the proposed transmitter /antenna falls between the 1840 -1930 megahertz bandwidth, which is well above the frequencies used by local emergency service providers. The operation of this tower will in no way effect the daily operations of these essential services. In addition, PCS signals are not known to interfere with television, FM radio, or other similar electronic transmissions. Approximately five- hundred square feet of the subject property will be leased for the proposed use. This lease area will include a one - hundred foot monopole outfitted at the top with a three sector antenna array. Each sector contains three antenna panels. Each • • 3 antenna panel measures approximately four feet long and six inches wide. The antenna will be mounted vertically on three support beams. The beams extend approximately two feet from the sides of the free - standing pole. There may also be one or more small microwave dishes (two foot diameter) attached to the monopole structure and located approximately twenty feet below the antenna panels. These microwave dishes might be added later to augment telephone service at the site. In addition, there will be four steel equipment cabinets, each measuring forty-eight inches in height, and occupying a space ten feet long by thirty -two inches wide. These cabinets will be mounted on a concrete pad next to the monopole structure. The entire facility will be surrounded by a six foot high chain link fence. Estimated power densities and potential health effects to the public are calculated to be exceptionally low, due to antenna height and power levels. The combined effective radiated power (ERP) of the proposed facility will be less than fifty watts. Radiation emissions will be a minimum of 1000 times less than the accepted general population exposure standards set by the American National Standards Institute. These standards are recognized by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Health and Safety Administration and the Federal Communications Commission. Findings: City of Tigard Community Development Code 18.70 Light Industrial District 18.70.040 Conditional Uses A) Conditional uses in the I -L district are as follows: 2. Utilities. The proposed development is a utility located in a light industrial zoning district. 18.70.050 Dimensional Requirements A) Dimensional requirements in the I -L district are as follows: 1. There are no minimum lot area requirements; 2. The average minimum lot width shall be 50 feet; The width of the subject property is three- hundred seventy feet. • • 4 3. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96, Additional Yard Setback Requirements and Exceptions, and Section 18.100.130, Buffer Matrix, the minimum setback requirements are as follows: a. The front yard setback shall be 30 feet. The proposed facility will be setback in excess of 700 feet from the front property line. This far exceeds the setback for the district and use. b. On corner lots and through lots the setback shall be 20 feet on any side facing a street; however, the provisions of Chapter 18.102 must be satisfied; The proposed facility will be setback approximately 1000 feet from 72nd Avenue and in excess of 200 feet from the Interstate 5 Freeway on -ramp. c. No side yard setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the I -L zone abuts a residential zoning district. The proposed facility will be setback approximately five feet from the northern property line. The subject property does not abut a residential zoning district. d. No rear yard setback shall be required except 50 feet shall be required where the I -L zone abuts a residential zoning district; and The proposed facility will be setback approximately one - hundred fifty feet from the east property line. The subject property does not abut a residential zoning district. e. All building separations must meet all Uniform building code requirements. The proposed facility will comply with all separations required by the Uniform Building Codes. 4. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98, no building in the I -L zoning district shall exceed 45 feet in height. The proposed facility is not a habitable structure; therefore, it is exempt from the height requirement per Section 18.98.020 -- "Projections not used for human habitation." • • 5 5. The maximum site coverage shall be 85 percent including buildings and impervious surfaces; and. Construction of this proposed facility will not cause the site coverage to exceed 85 percent. 6. The minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. Fifteen percent of the total lease area will be landscaped with 6 foot high view obscuring shrubs and appropriate ground- cover. 18.96.020 Additional Setback from Centerline Required 2. Collector Streets: a. The required setback distance for buildings on the following collector streets is the setback distance required by the zoning district plus 30 feet measured from the centerline of the street. 72nd Avenue The proposed facility will be setback in excess of 1000 feet from 72nd Avenue. This more than exceeds the special setback requirement. 18.100 Landscaping and Screening Requirements Visual impacts of the proposed facility are mitigated by several existing Oregon Department of Transportation one - hundred twenty foot light posts located in close proximity to the proposed facility. Similar to these light posts, the proposed monopole has a galvanized finish and does not employ the use of guy wires. The facility is compatible with the light- industrial freeway oriented character of the area. To further mitigate the visual impacts, the equipment area will be surrounded by a continuous hedge composed of six foot high arborvitae. Additional plantings will be provided as required by the City. 18.102.020 Visual Clearance: Required a. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. The proposed facility will not be located within a visual clearance area. • • 6 Conclusion: The proposed facility is permitted as a conditional use in the Light Industrial Zoning District. The installation will not alter the light industrial character of the surrounding area or preclude the use of surrounding properties in the zone. The subject property is of sufficient size and shape to accommodate the proposed facility. All applicable requirements of the zoning district will be met. Public utilities and facilities will be only minimally impacted by this proposal. The • electrical operating equipment requires less than 100 amp service. Both power and telephone lines are readily available on or adjacent to the site and the costs of any extensions will be borne by Western PCS. All utilities will be underground. The proposed facility will operate in compliance with all Federal Environmental Performance Standards. The transmitter /antenna site does not contain any equipment that creates odors, vibrations or heat and glare. With the exception of monthly visits to the site by a small service vehicle, the proposed facility will not create any air pollution. The facility does not generate any drainage or waste- water. No radioactive materials, toxic, or noxious matter will be produced by the proposed facility. Western PCS has been granted a license to operate a cellular telephone system in this region of the country from the Federal Communications Communication. As mentioned earlier, PCS allows telephone users a higher quality of voice and data transmissions, while allowing them to transmit data or faxes during phone conversations. This service is yet unheard of in the Portland Metropolitan area, and will likely be very popular with today's cellular users. To remain competitive, businesses and people need to have the ability to remain connected while out in the field. PCS technology will allow them to remain connected while out in the field. ----, . • , , ' . • - ... . ' ‘.: :* -- • '.'''','` ' :('' 'Z'''s • *?...k'fiT,:;i:Vv.,)--Le,17.42.11;?*-471717i5S4iirlFtreV/Aitliktl'51.4.:‘41"■47%"ili.*-: i'■«; :V.V.IN.1.'ti!..iiIKF,1 '1') ., $ . ... • t7 ' ' .- • - , ." ',.. ' ' ',W .7 •:;1,•,.. q.....rh.,,..■. 0.-m• wai)r,s "iov''.4 ' .4, •••;.N , m.c.--..- . ',. ' .• ' ' ' ' - ' • • ' ' ' ' • ' ' ', . ' - . •.,' • - .0." -: '‘,..- '2 . A.- ' -.-YvIt•:.4 ,..,:::,,•• , ,,-...,..f.,:.,,, ..€*$,,•:4-, , r, ,.,„, ..,,•,.. 4 ..,.. ,,„< , .,,, ... i , ,,, .: , ',if. • ' '. ' ' ' .' 4 . , .'-; .. -, - ,2 - - 't'sbdt , -=',.k.,.`4:‘ , .:Uss..k.44 , •';'-' , !,` "'''.'' • . • '..:..;...; : . • ;.. .2:-..*.t.,.:,,....: , 1 k-ii , '.., .:,•:....''. • —......? 0 :' , •:,' , -- '..,:;',•,. 'r.ln. . • . • • , • 91016626 . ., • waalungton County • . . After recording return to: , A. •:.,: Irwin Schimmel . 10380 S. W. Cascade Ave. % ' ' ' • 1 Tigard. Oregon 97223 t a • 1 Until a change is requested, all tax Statements shall be sent to the • , following address: , T min Schimmel 10380 Sr W. Cascade Ave. Tigard. Oregon 97223 • ,., „ . .:. . . . . — ..• , • .'2 0 WARRANTY DEED , I , GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, a Georgia corporation, .... - ("Grantor"), conveys and warrants to IRWIN SCHIMMEL, an • ; ,) ..ilidividual, ("Grantee"), the real property in Washington , • , • :A ' 9 u ... County, Oregon described on the attachedExhibit A, by this I u reference made a part hereof, free of encumbrances except as • i specifically set forth herein. 71 , . ; -- ■ ■ SUBJECT TO and including of record; any visable uding all matters .. . . . , . . or apparent roadways, easements and rights-of-way over or :I -a across the.real property do not appear of record. • • 1..4. • The true consideration for this conveyance is One Million . • Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,900,000'.00). , . , Li • is . • ;,. , . 'This instrument will allow use of:.the property desCribed in this'instrument in violation%of applicable land use' laws and regulation.' Before signingor accepting this , instrument; '"the person acquiring fee title to the property • . should check withthe appropriate city oi planning department to verify ;approved uses. . ';',. •Cf 5 DATED this 29t day of March, 1991. .!.i . . . , ... , - GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION - c,11 IC .: '.. . , ... . ,,. , .•. .1 0. • • • .. G•'... ., ' ' - •• • . ,.... , •, ,. , -s; • . . , . . .„ a , . Dir'' . .1. ,•• • r, *-. Its .Vice Preside . .. .; c..: •.•7' : gt ,-. - • , , • -14:-/..---( •--. - - , .- - 5 ,;:.•,/ - 1 9 2 7 • ' = • „. ,, ......., , .e,.* == By :.: 4,■ • . ••: __ Its Assistant Secretary • :-„. ' ' •t -4 0,-:.....:.,-...:---- • . .,.• „ . . • .. . 1,,,,41.11as,, 5 WASHINGTON COUNTY .... - -REAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX • atiale • i 4 $ .? e • • ••,•, t Z". ” . V . • l:::. :. ,,r' 1 7?"/ 464 Ji FEE PAID DATE , WHil I ' e , I • , a ,,- Page 1 - WARRANTY DEED 1 - 4 / ...4,..„;;:vit. ; „:■i; . • 5•••,:.'.;: .../. . , - ..., . .. :,V.i.v.'..,'.4•'' 'fi:, " ' ' -- ,'' 1 '''.' , i . :I. . • • ' • • , . ' • ' ' ,. ; :,.. • !•:;',..' :' •1 :. - ' ....' -- : .. . ; -: ''... , ' ......,.: :: :,' ...., ..• d, '. '•,•,..-' . '..'-,.! , I; , t . :,"' .. .,,'' ' ' ' . , I . '' • . / . . ' '-' .: .. • : 1.. •• .' . i ,.. :,',." .. , . '. .. . — IIPINIMINIIIIIMIIIMINIII. • ' • • . . . • • ' • . ..• v. • - - .--,..1.-,,:,;. ;...7;• .,, $ , ;:rr , ! . .:, . . , . . . • -' . :2: . • -.: ' ''.:'!•• :.`'' - - •.- ' • . :- ' • :... "-' ": • ' . .• .,,, • .. . , • . 1 1 ::•':' 7 44 •;" :- - • , • • . : i . :'? . • • ,i..: • . , • . • : :: gg ';,.;-.:. • ) •I' • •• • • t: ' ' . , .. . • ''.1 • .. :,:):;:-•'),:. : . • • • , • .: - .' ' • . :..t '..• ...:,. ......: STATE OF OREGON ) ) .ss. - k . . :County of Multnomah ) , ., : 14,11tp,-..., •:.... , .1 ,;v:. , • ?" •4',.. •:::.' • ..• .d/ . ! ' ,,• 1:A ....• . . On thisa_f_ day of 1720A-e.A/ • , 1991, before me the ,....., '14 ...::".••: : •, - • 1.—• r 41' &;! .2:. . undersigned, • a Notary Public in and for said County and State, -:—..--:-•-•-...--• personally appeared -Dewey Mobley and William Craig, known to me •:.- .,,."... q.::-.... .•-.. • to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary, .respectively, ■ - ,.1.• ').. ,, _ ”..,..".4". ',' , : i of the corporation that executed the within instrument, known .. . -'ito me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on • . • o • . . : • ..-.behalf.....of the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me ....., . that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant .1 ' • 1 to its bylaws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. ,, • ,...F .$.„,i.;.-.:.',. ..,, • ,i,-• .. . ;r: . ..:1, p' leS:..?.:...... 1...' WITNESS my hand and official seal. .. . , „ • . _ i . . . . . . 1..,...:..4 .•`.:•-,,: .%. '', .z , 2 ,e_t::Af.ji;22stAILLL . g' '-'-; . ' ' • • . " ., ..-, ,... ..'. . • - ;P:,:-...i',I:i'''';':••• : - . ... '. '.:. • Nan L . Thomas (SEAL) My commission expires 11/1/92 • .1 • • • e,.. ' • .-.. • . . , ‘., . .•.?;•-•,.... •• 1.1, . . r'. : • • - •, .. . • , • ' . , • • • - J,ii; ..4 ,',:: '' .... r .. • ' ..• • • , . . . • • • :. • • 7 •$:•': '•: - , - -.:1`., : , • . • '. ...•••••••`• t ■;-• ...... ' . . . • • :,/ •. • • ••.: • ., 2,'; ' , -' .•'. . e..;.•. i;„ V L :,. r , , . ...,• . .• .. • ,.. • - .7,?...„,- . -„... ::,-....,\,-: '''''''' ''' :.fist.' . . .....,e.:•ti..v...- .. .......:, . • ....;,, ... • , ; i. • . .i .... / ,....,......: .-:,•;:::, ,,•::.,: 0 0 T/10 Ito 1 • - . . - , • , . , . • . • . .., .,.• •, ..., ••.' ;?, ,, • B ...:.....; i 1 .: -,,t, '..... ,,,..,...,..,( - • :•,. : : .. • • : - .': • . . . ,:,..1•4'. .*,'-t:•••:,:1‘ ' i etlk -:- P '''' ' . . . ' ... . • . . t - • ...., 6.... ••••••,..,-,:. ',/ 4. • - . ••• . . •, . . i'..• • - ..k.1..• ,, , T. ,.., ... '7010.. • ••:' ,, T • ;:.,•,C) ...." : , . . - . • ,..• 1. • -".Y.‘... ..- x. ''''' ....• ....%, . .. ' .. .t .. .: .... ........ 0, .. • . . ... . • . . .. - i...,,..,.., ' ., ..... • • • . _ • . • . .. ...,.. ; . ...... - :. • . -..., ... . • .. . . • 4 9 4 ';' ,:.?•q'...'.i3O.,,,,-*,,,',..,::A ,, ,, . • .:,. ., „. . • :' , . , . ." '#.•;,\'''IM.,:.:%:-TF::.....':;:4:1;; •:..... , 1..' . .i. - ' .: ,,.. .. 4: • ',. ... . .,..... . ., . . 4,, . .,, ,. .. . . .", .. • , t , '1 .. ':N' . "' i , ' ,.. .1 .;•'''''' '• '.? ....'" .%''. •'!. • ' .' '.-. • ' . ' '' • . . • . • . .. • • -,: ...7.. . • 'I '• „, . . ' ...s ,.......,.:' ...,.k ':-- .. :!. • 9. .• • ;-. . . :.• • • • • • '' •n••,'. • .• ., . )1.,:0;•';' ....,. ' ; .-. , ■:.r• , ....,,,,' . • • ;•,!C.'• ..,'..:''. : , , . ., , • •C?' '..1.,' ‘• • . • . s • • . '' • 44;;:t'r!g:':(''.-1%. +. . •• .. , . . . .; . • • ' 1 • • -.! • • •,. • ; . ,... . . . .. • ' ;.. • • •. -•*);:,.,.!':::::,...:.:.•;• ' . .•':' ' . . .. ' .'. . ; ., . , : .. . : • '•'.‘!, . . • t .: •-• • ' '; . • ''.• • .'•••%.:. . ; ' '1J!!''::::''''''• • . .• • ' ' .*., I .e. • ' , • .. , . • . • ..... • * •' ' , '.'--', .,■‘.:.• • • • ! • . • . • • :' :. • .. . . . • f .. , . it ,. • • . „ '1 • • •IerV: r ' ' ' " ..""; • " •.• • . .: : .■ • • • • • V ' - : ' •'''. :44 1' `,"*".... • ' • ' ' • • • • -,.: • • • • • . / • • • '3 • .,.. • . . • • . . . ! 14 '•th'" • A, •,' : .1::`, ^ .z. ::, ."1"." • •• .. . . • ., • • • . . . . 14( 4 44 V , ■ ‘ :•" .? g,: •• •' ' '''! • ; • : '-• d • '' . ...; ' t'. • ' • . • • . • .. . .. • . . If0 • ::.' V2, • . ••• '' 1;..' • • • . . . .. •• ' . , . . • ' ', •' ' • s ; ', '... • ••' : 4 • :.: . . . • ' . . • t• , • • l d Vt.ti'....,;■; ',;• ..:- • , • 1 5" : • : . .:., . . • • . • 1710,19t,';d.:::".,5i1;'.., ... • '''4 '.' ',.:-. ' , : .. . • • , ., • r•!'nti..451...:.•,'",,—,. •:::.,'§..., .' :... ...; ; • , • , . ., . . .. . :„ „' '- ■."',:'-; ..' :.'' •...:(': ''' '.. ....Y.' ' :, ::••• ' .,: ''.• .' . • • . ,. .. „' • .. . , ;1 : :.... • . , .'• • , --: ., • . . . , • . . , , . : .g:Irint.tA:e44 ,It, ,•:- : :4.4,' '', '• • : , . ... , .. '-• . . • • • ' i ' ., ' • ; • ' ',.".•!', : : ••• • • - •• '-' . , . • • i . .).. . • • . ...' ' . .., • • . • . . ' . i'4',14 , (...,,, .„ •...‘..; ;., 1-;;•-; • ' 'ii fo, ••,;., . • ?" : • • ••■ V ; • . • • • •,. 1 ' 4.,•'''' A "(:.' 0 f, 1 44 ., • , uli.i..,1,”? 04....•:::,„•• ,`; ... . . . . • • . • 1 DEED .,- .,'. . .. ... •...„ . ..., . , . l• 0.,::e4 ''..,:';'•.'.. 4' .- :‘;... ".' -: • . '' . '''''. :.• . . •'. • . N•4-` T.,44: . .,.. • - :. . e 1A ig... '''■...*: li41:" •-,;‘.... ? .- ..I • '.. . . ‘% ..... • , . . . • •• ,.. • • • . . • • . • . _ • • • . • .: `, . . • . , • , ,,, .. .. 's.. ,,. ....., - ,.... , .1:4; , ..,47:•••7::::•:-.it•:4•. ‘•7;•FtY,47ftriiN;177 tit'''"c' ' ... . . . . . • . . . ... .. . .. .. . . . . ' • ' ,t, *C i • •: ..• ." ;,; • . .. • — •, ' • . • 4.4 V • ...i • • ,.. . '' '' •• • . . lfre'. ....• • . : .. ":•■• •- ' ' • • , . , ,r 1 . , • s, i ,:ti". '4' • , i •• • : • . •.• • •. . ,.. .v4‘:-..::-.. • . ..Lk • • ' , % 4 ... ,-,:.;;. 1 . ,., .1.:: I.: --.,: ,.-. • !. ..., N, . .. ,., A ..' . i! • . 0, t -"• ' • 4. I ' • . ..1 i . pi.; • - 1 . RN. i-r.. 6x 7. " EXHIBIT A" :;..0. . . .1 I . i -...' .: .-, , • :t.. ..1.. . -; kt • - 1. 4 . - • . . . . , -• ' ,-... - . . . .- A..,-,....) ....,::-... . .• PARCEL It . J. . • • qi" • 4 -e • ' :.i' • - . .. Ill - . .. • : . ••• tr-s., , • i...' % . : .L.-. • Prom .the South quarter corner of Section 1.4 Township .2 • South, • .•., ' ...;. :..,., .., : ..-. • . . . ...-.: .f ..';.: Range ,. 1 Wei t, Willamette Meridian, in the '' of Washington .4 t... ..:.,', .• • • ; and State of Oregon, run Nort1089°52 East lalong the South line • • • iFs,.... . • thereof 1 4 7 5 : 7 0 feet ' to the place of eginning for this • '.'.,,•''.:-..• .. description; thence North 0°08'. Wes t 40 feet' to an •iron rod at t ' the Southeast .corner of • that tract described' as Parcel I in the mortgage to the Hank of California dated: June 2, 1964 and . . • • `g'.:::.1:',•. • . .. . . . . ,,,.--:-.;...•. :.: June 9, 1964 ',in. Mortgage Hook 50:3 page i.,452; thence .'• ., . - ... 'e . North sa o 0°08', West along the East line of tin m tract so mortgaged . . -, ria:::•;.......i .: : ;: ..... .. • ,;•;::..,.....;!. '!„ and said line extended Northerly 330 feet; (thence parallel with r .. •.: A' the South line of said Sect4on 1, North 89 East 1076.75 feet . .. 1 ••••-• : to a point, on the West line tif Oregon State Highway known as V".f•.'...• - „,-..;..,-,•,.. Baidock Freeway; thence South along the West),ine of said highway .. ... • ,i. - ,...• ..4 370 fee to the South line. of said Section 1 fl.thence South •89°52' • . • '.. ‘ • . - . West along::: the South line Of ?:: said Sectidif. 1, a 'distance of , - ;-`.t:,1 .,- .;• . .. , =: • ''' .-....,,........ , 1076.28 feet to the place of beiinning. .... t4 .. • .. . . . . . .. . . . An, . . . tt '. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion described in dead to the State •• . ' ,. .i' of . ;•.. - Oregon, .: by ' and through :. its State Highway Commission by - rvt• '''.... Recorder's Book 558, page 524. •" • 4 ., . . ... f ,, , , tr • •:, . .. . . ' 4. it • - .., - .:.. i' . .' '' ':• -,-;,......- '....!,-•• %, • f - v - '." . :.. • .:.,; • . .. •,' P ARC EL II t ,^,-. , ;.,,. - • ...i " • Pt • .,. , . . . ' "Yr:'.7'1';' '`• : '' .• A' • - p : ,: l . ' .— ••• .. ' i .:... • .. ..; s• . . . . . ., • .• .....:':.'PrOm •• the •• South': quarter , . ... , of . Sec l Township ;2 South, ' , .. . • .213." .,;., .J. - -• : . , • • , Range • •,West,..,,Willamette meridi'an,.: in the County :'of Washington .. — • 2 and ,, State of Oregon -running ....No'rth'' 89°52' Etist • along the South ., • 4 .. , :• , ' , '- 4 :: :.- ';': line 1353.2 :feet . to 4.:::',..!1 inch iron 4:ipe located on , the . • ".; '::':'' .'• * ::'/•" ."''''.' ' - •'• 'pi) int . of in tarsection of • the South line ,. of said Section 1 . ..with :.,..:•:,.. .;.:.:- . ,, :,, •:',.'1:...c.';',2..4' ,,:. th• ,:Eatit • line • 0 . S'.W. 7'2n : Avenue (County Rod No.: 245 ) ..and the ..... . • . j•;.•';.,% :-:••point 'of 'beginning • for this description, theittisC`North East . .. i':": along the South line of said Section 1, a diVtance .. .of 12 feat •• . • ......., , .... ., ,...,,, :," •:::,. -- • to Southwest corner. of 'above - Parcel I; ..thende - North 0°08' West . „ • ; .,; .. .,.7 ..:,,, . . ... along ....the .West:F . of - sa.id ' Parcel S ;a distance of 40 feet; :. . ;... ..„ . therice..'South 8§•52' . West 115 feet to an Cie:in •. and thence ,.. --, ..t continuing South 89°52' West along a line which is parallel with -,, ,.... • 3 . . . ....:?•;:-.,:.... • and . ..40 . feet the South line1.' of, said 1, to the .point • . .: .:.• - .r.'....:,• . of . intersection with the Northeasterly :lineAcif said S.W. 72nd . • . ..) . v. .'•: .. : .t. . • . • :,,.;-...-'• . : Aii•nue: . Road No. 245); thence Southeasterly along . .... .e. • ,:•Y '.'" :: lin• of said S.W. 72nd Avenue (County Road No 245) to the place .. . • ., : . , . ! . .• of b•ginning:- ., . •,-..• .•. .,.. . I . • •v • rli . . . : ' ':' - • '-' PARCEL III: ';.;.;• • • A • •t • 1 .4 - '::f...', : - . . . .:: •. :). • . . t.q. • •.•:;. . . - • .'fil ... .., • .. •k . 1.f.iY.r .-:;.... A. .:: tract of Y in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 1, ,. ,: 7 .. •■•.‘ - , , - •:-, .. ... • ' c-i..i:. •• ,,,- Township ;.2 48outh, ,. Range 1 Wait, ...Willamettek- Meridian,"'; in the • ;.'. •'„? ,:;:,. ..,ti County of Washington and State of Oregon, particularly described - ., . ., • 1 '"er: 1 l - '16ows el . •: ?:;- • • 4 ,.• - f 1•• . . . ' • t'''' ' . . . . '.. ' , . . .. 4, • 5 ,:.t.p.',.'1,',:-1.. ....,,,,',.,:,.. - ... .;., `. .- , , %.. , .: . '', • . .... .p., , • . , • . . • 16 4 f,■ :'. .... " .i .s : .,4', :. !."- .., .. ' -.!.. . , - :•,',. . • -:-,•• . ' . ...,... .. . . . . . . .. , , , i41 , 1 , .t.•. - 4 ,- -p , '-' •• ,:,...-. '; '. :I." ' ' ....,:' .'- , • 1..4"......" 1 • • EXHIBIT A .:,, .. . •', ` -",: . . it..,, ki• . ,it , . - . tl• '' - ; ;•;,;„ , . '...:', . • ., . . .. r• . : .' ,' ,• 't • •;...:•,' t• • ''.,:. '.. . . A, ', :': . . ''':';.,f i' " • .•;'';'''.' •,.. : ':- ' ' ' 't . . ... ' . ,... • - ...- • ; • .. . • . • • . . . • ' • ' ..... . .. . .. . . . . . •'' 'V • ., . • • . - • , ... .• , , ,, , • .• . - . • . . . — . . . . .... . . . . • ...... .. {.,...: �rm4': �,�: w--::. a:+:+. w m-., Is3i +iw.,� ..........:..:.u...�....: __..,.t.;..,�.n_,.,.. ,,..... -. _ _..__. ....:_. _ -s.. _... •.__... _ • • '•• , • • — — .F' - �.m,;... r : Ji'a:f : :19::: Y fi ' .,rn •r'.� q ,c�a:� � �'.� •:,: t F ..r` ..J. ' — l% • 1 4 ( ,.• ti •.• rr :,:p• :';f 1 `t1._ " ;" • \ 1,' 1 `JF' 1 ' ; y; ,� r 1 r , ^ I ,, .a . .. ti , m �' : y:. 'J'•. „ 1• r +• .+.t. ; i' 1 r 7 J �• > : �` t { 1 fti s -+ S 'ate � . .. • • ' �' Sr�! _ . . • � . ' ,.• t `.;• h ! • s ,:. ' ',4 r:. - r EXHIHI "A" (continued) ' . ' y ' • "• d �•rf� ..,` :tu . Beginning at a point on ...the South line of ',said Section 1, located � 'r . - •:V ,, -_ ',:. North ,89 °52'. • East' 2.175.70 feet from the -South .quarter •ccrner of i • . ,,': °." , ,:', said Section •11 thence 'North 0 °08! West ° :•,:•,:- . 370.00 feet'•to the true F;.. ' ;;a „:; - ; , •"':poi n t,of - beginninq ?. *of the tract : - to be • described 'herein/ thence • 1 .continuing North`= 0 • .0 8' •,West .a "� .- 2x 'distance .of 5.00 feet','to,,a_ point/ ' ti-vn=• - thence 'South” 89 °52'rfweat - a distance of 703.00 • feet „to'.'a 'point; • 6, ,`,,;t'.'.• • thence South ,.,..0°08!„ Eaet . a distance • of 23.00 feet'. to a ••:- gn;;; , thence North' = = '89 °52;;. Eaet a' distance' of 3.00 feet to a points f;:t,�. thence North 0 °08', ,West . a .distance of 18.00 feet to : ''° thence North 89 52' :East a • distan point; rr:: ° ce of 700.00 feet ,.to the true • p oint of be in -; _ t i • • :, ' ' : .. - f: t f • • x '�,.,,, • , , : � o • • • 1 ! , :' i�Y • X1 y . i L •1• • , 1 ... ' ::., ;1tS4 rte-,.. "' 1 'a • _ • .'� . ,i .. ... '' ,S is � {gli t I Y' - ., '�' i, y • . t Y. ' .'t . j .A: ' . • .v. 7iv; . „. t „ s. .,•,;;;.• .'; ' . • STATE OF OREGON • , ' y ' . „;::'''''..i'3''' , ,' _ County of Washington ),1 �C S w � • } , SFr :• ' .� _ .'� <' _ •. �:. ,�� '. u ,. : ;;i tf , l i '% ' •t; :isy ..ff is :'i:' .� ,:�. � • r ,r • " Y ':� ; a . � , 4 : -�i { ;� ” • ,: {: �i.:• s< :'Y” , = • "a' ' R. , Hans— ... f m , • • . 4 ` •; ' and Taxation e. •t •ttleo •:der of Con•' v.. A�= ✓^."� .'�:, '' veyances for cgan re • 'Miry that y y c'i ` the within e - ecelved ' •.:. : Sii . Jj f '; 1' : ?,. Y;; .:L is and reco •■ :�',q A. .• 61• Ounty ., . '• '•r:: • '�' �;�; t. rr=' y`:,: , . r l'.' '�: is C�a . : `• .9 • • Fl ? ., Kr•-.. n 1 :f. . 1 _ •' * '. N • COUN�' • -YY : Doc 91016626 91 ; ,, . 'rid:: .In, :: s,',.;: , ' Rect: 52104 1948:00 • ' I s «o ,'+; ; ?-",; .,.: . •, • • . ' 04/08/1991.03: 45: 34PM ,:?5 • • •,Z: .i.. , .. - Y' t` '� C!. } . 1 ,i`: to' . .. i& 1, . ir •••, , ' , • i._ • .'� • ., 't;:, r , • :f t ,{ u , r -�' . t � l {,t, ',..,-;:.,:"I'!:4•,',',,,, tr'• . • L • �ai•t - h c_ ,: . r, ',,,,v,.- ,• � •t,,,`• l,l i:' r:l.'' - f•�t , 6"?S1'r• '.� 4 f3n : ' , `�.' 1 �, •r• '%,. i' FJ . w .1��. t . + '•� a, , i: •_c • :l,.. . ' <�:.• � ` • • ' EXHIBIT IA , ti i '�, r.( �j { f:'Ar ry >1'• at- rx: �: u' - . ..ri// � F ,. tT .yy'Ct v : 4 E . :k..tje } .+ f. :.t , ;,;;&, : t': ; ��..t.y� - -1P `''• ' i 1.1: !•; , f , , 1 ' w .• -•,; : � i •• V IA' . ''' _.r • 'J�,• 1..w4.T X31. :1v.,. !.7.0 /...M1f:.Y>i'M art . <' :.t.:�k:• „*5 .:' 'i 'tem's: •'• : -i:G'• ... .:7 �y.t[I' �!•. ;,• 1. • • �. 1 vs / • • WPCS Corp. • • RF Site Data Sheet (,, P n Site # (i0 — 15.3_,G_ Site Name _ 6 f . ol Option Name r r r' &jr S III • Circle All That Apply ( Twer/BTd / g Existing ew' IV1 onopo a /Lattic 4 i e i1 k Lat / Lon. ' N � C 1 I W Piak GE ft. AMSL RC A ft. AGL EC o 5'99 FAA Study # Lighting Req'd Y / N (circle one) Marking Req'd Y / N (circle one) Configuration Omni Sector (circle one) # of Sectors . � ID Coax Antenna Specs prig t Ctr Line Azimuth Mech ERP Size Mfg MdI # Inverted ft. AGL ° TN Dntlt Watts TO T1 RO R1 \k. • ATO lEi[ �� AT1 ARO 1113111111111ltr1111iMi EMNIER IW 0 I AR1 IIIIIIIIIIIMIPIMMINI BTO maimutgannratatanswasopmaws BT1 NIIIINIIIBIIPMNIIIIIIII BRO EIIIIIINTAIIIMIT% E'IIII IIIIMININT . BR CTO Ei NIIIIII'ENDiEIIIIMIIM ��_ W4 CT1 111111j11111 CRO M N. MI I iA cn CR1 — Attached Antenna Layout Dwg # Dated '�- s 9 m Electronics Configuration: n l 1 O TRX: Omni A l B 1 C/ 1 Approvals: RF Enginee( It tAC-1 S (5J % RF Mgr: to v • .6:2- 1 J • • WPCS Corp. ANTENNA LAYOUT DRAWING • Antenna Layout Drawing #: :Z _ Site Name: 5 ` � ' ' ' --r Drawn by: i40 i'�; /> r:,:: �r• Site Number: U — j32�.: Date: 1251 -, I Option Name: ;;)'J .A i..,;r j. r II .5° 111 T i i �`I .► . . i\-00 \ KJ .- 255 ►o AR ! / C r } CP i ill / , 4 , ..0c i o ...L 255 C / \ , BFI `t D I00 . , P LJNCC 1 OT TG Scc ; ' 0 (;,/ CLA47:1\fr,-04-3 1 , Sit-C2 0^^- dit-11-(t,U (A/a•C_ ' ,1") 60 Gt-s .06 6 1 - i “I ti' (1/(a DIK) • IP-HAl-r- . 1 1 /p,c4., i t Q s ) b L o S - Sb4 . lam" - 0 0x�X b .‘ ir 1 '!:Z l ! ] L' ., � }. -4'. ' ` r • l ;T: .1 .. - �. ::. - • - \. 't "ice' \ _ .� .r ' .' • • .\ • N .j •�, .�1 - _Z• •� t 1 ;f' f � : x' .,. 11 L - - r. ••_ 411V.._;_•\;.•11\ 1 .-- to \ i . : 'P'Pa�_ /� ,\ _ - _'r' .,1. . ^ \ 1 - 1 I il' ql I117 s, \1VV ...;;; - 1 , 1 , 1 ,...... � -_= ,.• • I - • -n,: -' • � ': •' rA , `• •' . / rt t ','J -,L 1 a �•.(I - _L__ -� _ l •�• . . 1 1 ; . ; \ - ILL'FN U 11T ' q� `� "' ' f� .. '�� • • 1 • I : ' .1' :'v �: ■ : I r \6; li \ • = °: j ji, i ( :;I % 1 l /' I�: • ill r. �•, •. 1 I I ; !CL - - _.�(:( j • ..r • \ , � ..,, .V.- alrrr' ) %.,2.--'-'-1:-.---1:1--:. ...� 1 .:). ,1l C1 t l 1C\ . I - � i II I ' ( . •• ' \\ t - � , -- -•: '' _ ,- I J !I' 1: AG aI '1+ I tiT. t ?h ''! �. Via'- r �• � _p. : ` :, ` • l . ,i �.;' 4,.....)•.,: . ,:.:4.:..4‘1..1;,,,,,,:.:;/-:,.:•:.:,., ''• ;o, 1') -;II � „ J . 1 I I. i s I = 1 .. ^ ),1 •\ t ' • •l(:: - . . 1. : ',-1:11. � d t ..''.*• � ` n l \ ”. - _ � .7 • • i • II 1 \ • St \inhonS "" a te : •' Y \` Y • I : - � }. � ! f \ 1 „ .. „... i I .\ i t �' I: : • ,''''` \'G\, \TI'et'.e ::.,v �Va a - 1 9 t: i • : I `0 I -- - •' ■ I � 1� a7 :;I� �1' ,� x,• I I / -. -• , �. ' • G' / mi • -- 4 1 . I •. _ • P ^ c:uv Via• • `'�•�'v ��•�_ • q / �I•� _ 1 �` . \� � r. ' .• ' - ' 1 ' T.i1'JI...,,..,_2_,,,.. .___ .1 \ . _ ., =n a • . ii / o �1 \�, • , 1 • / • • . - I , , / ., II qI �� Siv ,l,E2ROS "E- '�v` =.1� :, ': • .; ' ii .,, .r-ri. .1 . .. 1 LL :IT .;•\ o . - ' - �' O �' , \' I _ F I AM T FARM -.�I k. /1q/.- 11 • \ :''p ! •• •gt r ...,` -,� C- c` n �,� 'O� -:' ;--1 �1�- ` ' "v.;� \ _� AIRPO ` r ,I • Jf <I w.,r�1 6,.0 ... .1 7Q' -,•ma • /v Svek QElvO• .w.. n _I_ \- - � � ` _ f ■ ` - y � - ', I fi • '---C.,::;;.^.-=;'... / ' � .i : r \ �° 6 , , )) /1 y � r -- _� - ; C o • • •o_ • - f - • • • -• _ __- a 1 -- - -3111' . I 117 I',_ - : 1 i _ __ ^ �,✓-- • I�atl• . i ::/__,-..... ^: _ -. =1 th ® r _ h - ... � , i • ' \l� • H r ==== , _ , .\j 1 3 = - _ .1 ;] •. '1�\ %; : l 5 ° ' 4 ` .. ° ~ i t:_ t :c . ., lb' I ��. : •. ". 41/'` " 1.� :. ^�C .. .B oni ta ' -.,..: a. _ / r _ • -%. J i1 _ ?, ..__ „ ,^ :\ -\ 4 _3: ^ - , If i:. 6014/.4_ •, - -RD . • _, _ L� 3 Ly. 9U '__ -- � • /. ��. 1‘..A.” • • _\ ,. �.."._ . / �_ • �. ' • • �1 _ • • �. � '. �I I 1 • . I , >f 1 1 R D ' , . ' ' ...: • . . \ ,, , � - -? 1 I I • N \ u ,Sw t. - 7. - A ( 4 ; �? 1 ' 1�/� 1 . :( I _ • ,� ',,. • " , • '_I= -7' ' / /• I • r - .X. \,_. • G ' • � k .1,/1/41-,,,,.' • ,. 1 1 _. � . - - ' •- ,_jr....., ' i y ' ' � di i ' A u l:nku (. c ._ " • - I :. �CT < c Q - ' � ., is rn ' _- \ ` �� •r.' • ' ' L.. - ' f4 . / 1 \'ncac '�' , " : ' l r r! . I. 'i � 1 � / V , ' � _S1( •` GP�i _PARN I' ti / ._ / ! /J ✓ . • / ., // v � -; n l ----.L.,- " _ ' c r I w _ .. i l' -. ; , i, —.. —.. \ \ r - - l • •r :.s-� S.Wd• /• ,9'A rn.E. a - ✓,?.• 1' i\ " \ ' f C , 2 FlRw000 RO i F � � /, it / II �L - - _ u 7 • % ■ /L ' I . • ` i 1 j \ � ` -Y 7 J - / 0 .11.E F �\ .���� , ` , �I / ^ \ • } •, I' 12 I ° ac �� %a 7 ., ! " � • �, w II 1 \ J�� �j% ; � i/C: \�_�I (,; ...s j ' QI li II II I�' 0, / '" � • . � t�.5z3 ▪ �I__ ` .-�" /7�qD • , 7 , ... . . �::IIJ /� ” �� •�� =- , J ";' /\, O / I -� �_ii•' 1 ,J/ I y-'� —. if • . qi. -.t :II:: ;— I I. ,• - - g - � r - II V Igard ' � , / " ' f� II � � �• ., - , � ; :II. = !I. -i_., l�• , � -_ . �..' /j .' --� / V • �{ y,i, '' • / ^ 1 � j � 1Rh j -1 . ) II �' — JI _ ,. o \': 193 • 0,:•--- - { I .; .> / % . �a21t :1 1 . I1 .. ''K- ,, - �. / ' 2> <� I l- = --0 _�i_-. -_ - / G ter% � , 1 ,ice I. s. -. ' 1 ; ; - : _ y ✓ \o ld %% C' ` % "�; �� 1 JD \.I I j/� fry • -: .-'•1; ! °`" `�i•�:. . ' r' • °- I - a te°``- ��J� -`?'�• r N ' /r l _ /. -ram l� \ \" `-�� ••!. - �,f \ ` _ � � 5� `^• �7I Grata ••-:%; ICE :.,:p / _.' . i I I . //• :i • i — /F Vii ttl! r c �� '• •- . / / _ ' , . ` - � 6- : .,, w � - c1 1 •. L . f /. , f ` , • • _ • r --- q I r „ \� ( �, . ofr� = '_ " - 5 \ , . - , Jea • 1 4 3 _ L,_... • ? . /. 7 \4 I ✓ ' a Ls 1 ose\ull. o o r \�`� - - - '1' b ra cam• �i l //,..1 : I +J 5c r-_J r 1 C N I :- 7 •GJii,} v J r � - W \ I- " JEA Y/ R•iAD• I -- -. - - � -- ' T,I i I \ \ / • I � I I I %�/ %• II. �? { �� I . •! - _ i _ _ _'�� •„.„, I Q ... „'�8 I. = \ � 1 i B M .! ___ ,\� \/ " 1-41 1 �� �1" r / � � i ,,,,, & - .. I . ,.,4 1 \� ( 9 . ' v � :., ' ,: , t , Mlle to l l .l' �/( � _ 1/ , �- S � S 7.3 (I i / I �.: I ' ') 11 TU ATIN ., :I 1 `�, P �O � am ir1.1,3 ;�;! kl ir 1 ,- ,, e- w�E rsks R• 11 '' I∎ 1 .i • i nona r ~� sill 2.1". I r 1 .. y ' Fp/ /r. F R 1 1 • ♦ i �. I i ii / I II Cem`11. '� j:: IRYoC t ` _ _ \U' 1 .I r a l l? r �� . -jam\ ,..mss. - --t R•� ?t Cr_ ___=_.i. . C t�' y�i = . � '` / • - i J y ACIFIC r t Par'; \ �U' BM -�33` / u• �% �� JO' �{ i - s � `1 z• _ m/ _ Mi le 8 - _ . 1 T o ^' , ,;.A.. �c h� Iii, I l 'd _,_ ( '-� J 8 12 f =. ::, 1 : ,ti _x%%`: 4 • I Quarr . r -- 7 / . • J ( 23_ ; N t. 1a -: : • 7J V -. ! r "W�'vJ - - _ _:.‘ _ _ v � 1 = - ri � h 1 -� o _ail f i•... : 1 Q t 1 n I ' I _ V.. V c 11 t) . 11 . " - --J� . al I C 1 .. -: ° .- - • ••,, ▪ p -- ., �: r � --`J . 1z , . � 1 . /'.z,d; _ — I - l � 1 . - if- . .n .,,. I l" • /50 --/ ��,. -I 1 1 I � '• n 111 _�. I .. '•, .� ,, • 1 ' e l ' ■ t i ®®p D 9 ' . "'1' qtri • TIT IIl11 1111 11118 . . 1 11 1 11 11 q 1 MI (111 31 p a III �(' 1 DII �I1 � I !l p t.. z A in '11•l il ls Br 1111111 1 ow. p91 :II MY I ,~ NMI a�i 11111 111i 11 MIT 1 III'; 11" m NI 1 a: 1 G• 1 a 1 W 4 4 1 1 mu ',Irmo. 19 I T "-- 1.... : i A 1 'Tipp' 21 n 9 l I f "1 1 1 I ' ; q : I r--, . . sv Is 0 II c § 11 11; 1 11 fli , , 1 b s 1 1 Oil I 1 gel i ' 1 t I : kg.fli girk:P-iti ,u..._ __ ,t, iii , , , t Z, li ;Liinti t aluto ,''. 4L7/1414E1!IPtiii , . ' 1 . . 4 eMA Irg —2,,.,. __A •} '- ' Tr I ' -1-5- -- -- - gm te4 °,�,, :4.--4.-,1.. i t. o . . - . . . . • ;; j:• -i r ‚I d ■ p. P P. Hill W 1 f ° 1 p �1 i D3 m ' ' i `` C PP l �1 i 0 N 1 9 11 N 0111111 * - _. 70 CO n CD g i M 91 8 ! E1 !! i CO 0 ;pi; � "� iiiiiiiii i u/ 4 " 1 ! I 0 1 111 10][i]lli i Eil II. 1 .411 r .. II = Iiiiiii g: ig • I- gg ill 11111 - 11111 — — - -- • , . 3 a 1 1 wi i g 1 v ► i I r 12 1011111 `� r \ $1 %X ' Z. 6 ]1 Y16tl3lNl Cg , I(8 • 111 e. 'i , ...ur g = g I ' A . : 4.,, Illtakaill . i I I ; PH g , 11' i dvrtkilal W z - g ;1 I1111 ir I 4 ;' t g i1 X s i ; , 1 II ' :` y C " / 1 \ p II ib' 11 II" • i 1 rf . • I I 1 ' }} ¢ I dad t Ali a II " JIL 1, 6 il 1 !II hi i ii � �Q II �� rg i . ` 1 i Ii�>r ` a b 1 ° II 1 1 11 11 I' , II ' • • • , -, • . i latsgg cil i R 61 fi Igk'•!ii! X . i J � IXy w • p M el1 I1 1141 ;IAN 1 y MI i - : ' ' gg r i pp p !I i�d p1 goi r .l 6 lio iii l f i11B111r NY pi. I , f lr -X114 E e 1 iX X A X ' b� rag I . %p@,Pr5 @1 Ei � b P 1 « 141- - ` e t Ri' I 1 ... ; i !!I ; A 1 .11: YQ , p qtl 9e Y d 1 6Y e l IW el IV b' p�9r % 9 2 I 1, � � b 1 I I�tr Y/M rin! fr ! ' • k' • • 11 January 1996 City of Tigard Planning Division Attn: Mark Roberts 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 Alison Smith Koll Telecommunications 7535B NE Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97220 Dear Mr. Roberts: Please find the enclosed signed affidavits for mailing and posting notices. They are in reference to the conditional use permit application by Western PCS Corporation for the development of a cellular communications tower at 14020 SW 72nd Avenue. If you have any questions, please call me at 284 -8714. Thank you. Sincerely, k LISea M i son A. ' th . Koll Telecommunications • • • Name of applicant A -. MIL c •, Stject Property: Tax Map and Lot # Z 3 ( 01 DD L a x Lof f3O 0 Address or General Local= 1 YO zo S C A J 72 �� �+v.r,.k - ' 1 - 6,d ©Z_ J AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE 1. M c L a-, 1 i r-r, o orT . do affirm that l am (represent) the party initiating interest In a proposed j on' /n Ono e 0l-e_ (' v l Lv 1 a- Ile w-v affecting the land located at 1 7 o Zo 5(4) 72 A V't -1 u e_ and did on the 9 day of Tan Jar-y . 19 AL, personally post notice indicating the: the site may be proposed for a , r o n ot; -4-; 0,‘,1 's , / P e/ 4- application. and the time, date and place of a neighborhood rneedng to discuss the proposal. The sign was posted at 1'I o Zo 5 Ai 7 2, A (state locadon on property) This r � day of :�a u„ y , 19 q b • Signature Shed and sworn to, affirmed. before me this Io J day of J gdr .19 96, ; _.L i• Vie Stift at 0 • �, :.;; i �10`t,�FY FU LIGORECCV • I c M C o m m i s s i o n E:gairem .1//9 MY COMA ?is o Er;Fi�":3 , .: WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 loginycAposurotriit • • HEALTH AND SAFETY: A PERSPECTIVE ON THE ROSEDALE CELLULAR SITE SUMMARY This section provides a summary of information that is responsive to questions about health implications of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic (RF) fields that would be emitted by the Rosedale cellular -radio installation which has been costructed by Cellular One. The activi- ties of several standard - setting organizations, both national and international, are surveyed in the light of their recommended limits on exposure in relation to levels of radiation associated _ with cellular -radio facilities. Definitions useful in the development and understanding of expo- sure standards are provided, as are a glossary of technical terms and a bibliography of useful references. Two timely conclusions follow from the data base on biological effects of exposure to RF fields and the calculated theoretical exposure levels from the Rosedale site: First, because of the weak signals that would be emitted by the Rosedale cellular -radio facility, the intensity of RF radiation to which the general public would be exposed is below the permissible limits of all known standards the world over. And second, the current concern for extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields, for which some epidemiological studies have shown positive if weak correlations with malignant disease, is not applicable to the much higher frequency fields used in cellular radio. Unfortunately, there has been a tendency by some members of the media and the laity to confuse the RF fields of cellular radio with the low frequency magnetic fields asso- ciated with high- voltage transmission lines, distribution lines, and household wiring. There is nothing in a vast array of data that justifies this confusion of oranges with apples. DISCUSSION Science is an open system, and its practitioners must continually re- evaluate the implications of an ever - expanding data base. But even if a data base is extensive, there can be no warrant for the safety of any device or agent, whether it be mother's milk or moonlight, because "safety" is a negative concept and science cannot prove a negative. To provide scientific support for the proposition that there are "safe" exposures to RF fields, it is necessary first to demonstrate the conditions under which they are harmful. A number of agencies in the U.S. and elsewhere have undertaken the task of evaluating the data base on RF fields and proposing limits on exposure that preclude occurrence of harmful effects. Foremost among these agencies is the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). In the mid- to late- 1970s, a special subcommittee was assembled by the ANSI to review pertinent data and compose a set of guidelines for protecting occupationally exposed workers and members of the general population from excessive exposure to RF fields. The members of this subcommittee were unpaid volunteers drawn primarily from university and federal laboratories. These physical and biomedical scientists reached accord on a set of scientific principals by which to guide their evaluations and judgments. First, they noted that any presumption of safety depends on demon- stration of the conditions under which exposure to RF fields is harmful. Second, they accepted the time - honored rule that evidence of harm must be substantiated by independent research. Third, they realized that the imperative to exclude multiple - stress artifact in research on harmful effects mandates exposure of normal, intact mammals, including primates, that are free of envi- ronmental stress except for that resulting from exposure to an intense RF field. And fourth, they recognized that if there were multiple manifestations of ill effects, the most sensitive biological TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc. • GREENVIU.E, NORTH CAROUNA • Page 2 end point should serve to anchor an exposure standard. The results of the subcommittee's deliberations were published by the ANSI in 1982. Although the ANSI had published RF exposure standards in earlier decades, the 1982 standard was the first to employ a dosimetric basis for limiting exposures. The data on harmful effects of exposure were examined in the light of a traditional measure: the intensity of the incident field (i.e., the power density as reckoned in microwatts per square centimeter (= one 1,000th of a watt per square centimeter = p.W/cm In addition, the dosimetric measures of the quantity and the time rate at which RF energy is absorbed by the mammalian body were incorporated into the standard; these are specified in units, respectively, of joules per kilogram (J/kg) and watts per kilogram (W/kg) of body mass. The energy dose in J/kg is formally termed specific absorption (SA) and the energy dose rate is formally termed the specific absorption rate (SAR). Biological bodies absorb differing quantities of energy as a function of the frequency of the RF field. For example, because human beings from infant to adult exhibit resonance - -the most effi- cient absorption of RF energy - -in the very high- frequency (VHF) band, which extends from 30,000,000 cycles per second (= 30 megahertz = 30 MHz) to 300 MHz. In the ultra -high- frequency (UHF) band, which extends from 300 MHz to 3,000 MHz, absorption of RF energy by human bodies is much less efficient. Cellular radio operates in the UHF band at frequencies near 850 MHz. To exemplify the frequency dependence of RF energy absorption, human bodies exposed to VHF fields at a power density of 10,000 microwatts per square centimeter (10,000 1.1.W /cm would absorb RF energy at an SAR as high as 4 W/kg, which many scientific studies have shown is near the dose -rate threshold of harm. At a cellular -radio frequency of 850 MHz, the power density of an incident field would have to be near 60,000 µW /cm to produce an SAR of 4 W/kg. Power- density and numbers will be more meaningful in the context of some comparisons. For example, exposure to the electromagnetic energy known as sunlight can attain a power densi- ty near 50,000 p.W /cm -- at noontime on a cloudless day. Note, too, that a human adult at rest generates metabolic energy at a rate near 100 watts, which translates to a specific metabolic rate near 1 W/kg. A human being jogging at a moderate pace is generating metabolic energy at a rate near 4 W /kg. The ANSI 1982 standard was basically a recommendation that human beings should not be exposed to an RF field that results in an SAR in excess of 0.4 W/kg, which is a tenfold reduction below the consensus threshold of harm. Other standard - setting agencies in the U.S. and abroad have conducted independent surveys of the scientific literature to the end of recommending limits on exposure to RF fields. The Nation- al Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), which was chartered by the U.S. Congress with a charge to develop exposure criteria for all forms of electromagnetic radiation, published an extensive review of the data base on biological effects of exposure to RF fields in 1986. The physicians and scientists that participated in the deliberations of NCRP's Scientific Committee 53 (SC -53), which authored the review, adopted most provisions of the 1982 ANSI standard. They also made a distinction between occupational and general- population exposures, which resulted in a two- tiered standard. The occupationally exposed worker - -for example, an engineer installing a radio transmitter- -would be protected at the original ANSI -1982 limit on the SAR: no exposure in excessive of 0.4 W/kg. However, an additional five -fold reduction was recommended for members of the general population: no exposure in excess of .08 W/kg. The NCRP's two -tier philosophy has been adopted by standard- setting bodies of many nationalities • and by the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA). And recently, the latest (1992) formulation of the RF exposure standards by the ANSI has followed suit. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA Page 3 Because the cellular telephone is a relatively recent addition to telecommunications technology, there are many questions that attach to function, use, and safety. In the paragraphs that follow, pertinent information is provided. . What is electromagnetic radiation? Simply put, cellular radio waves are a form of radiant energy that contains both electric and magnetic components. This electromagnetic energy travels (radiates) in waves like the ripples that form when a small rock is thrown into a pond. Radiation is the passage of energy through space. Radio waves are a form of non - ionizing radiation that can not strip electrons from biolog- ical molecules, in contrast to X -rays and gamma rays, which are forms of ionizing radiation used in medical diagnosis and treatment. It is important not to confuse the effects of ionizing radia- tions such as X- and gamma -rays with the effects of non - ionizing radio waves. Do.I absorb all of the electromagnetic energy that I am exposed to near a cellular -radio facility? I No. Unlike the case with VHF radiations, which can result in resonant, virtually complete ab- sorption of RF energy by the human body, only a fraction of the RF energy in the UHF fields used in cellular communications is absorbed. The amount of RF energy absorbed by the human body depends on a variety of factors, especially the frequency of the radio wave. Frequency refers to the number of waves that pass a given point in space during a given time. Because biological effects of VHF and UHF radiations depend largely on the amount of energy absorbed, the frequency of the electromagnetic waves affects the specific absorption rate (SAR), a funda- mental dosimetric concept in the evaluation of exposure to non - ionizing electromagnetic radia- tion. The human body absorbs much less RF energy at cellular frequencies (800 -900 MHz) than it does at the resonant frequencies associated with VHF transmissions (30 -300 MHz). What are the sources and characteristics of public exposure to non - ionizing electromagnetic radiations? Exposure to electromagnetic fields is ubiquitous and occurs to a number of natural and man- made sources. For example, the flow of electrical charges within the earth, which accounts for its magnetic field, and the energy from the sun and cosmic sources are constant sources of exposure to electromagnetic fields. Even the human body generates and emits electromagnetic energy. Common man -made sources of electromagnetic fields include electric utility lines, household wiring and appliances, and computers, as well as television and radio broadcasts. As indicated in Part I of this study, at the worst case ground level distance of 300 feet from the Rosedale site, the exposure would be 1.14 microwatts /cm The exposure at the same distance 30 feet off the ground would be 1.80 microwatts/cnf. At the base of the tower, taking into account the vertical pattern, less than 0.018 microwatts/cm would be encountered. Thus, these potential exposures at ground level will be on the order of 1 /1000 to 1 /100,000 of permitted ANSI stan- dards for uncontrolled public exposure. How do cellular -radio transmissions compare with other common sources of electromagnetic energy? Human beings are exposed to low levels of electromagnetic energy from a wide variety of sourc- es. The relative contributionfrom cellular telecommunications is very small. Commercial radio and television broadcasts are many thousands of times more powerful than cellular transmis- sions, and yet, because the intensity of radio waves diminishes rapidly with distance from the transmitter, public exposure to even the highly powered FM radio broadcasts is generally at very low levels. Engineers at the Environmental Protection Agency have performed extensive meas- TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA Page 4 urements of commercial radio fields in the largest U.S. cities. They found that 99% of the public exposure is 200 to 1,000 times below exposure limits recommended by the ANSI, the NCRP, and by agencies of other nationalities, worldwide. Taken in the context of VHF and UHF commercial broadcasts, exposure to electromagnetic fields from cellular -radio transmitters is of a very small order. How do we know that exposure to cellular radio waves is not harmful? Unfortunately, concern about extremely low- frequency (ELF) magnetic fields associated with high- voltage transmission lines and household wiring has triggered unjustified concern for the much - higher- frequency, VHF and UHF fields associated with radio and television broadcasts. There is abundant scientific evidence that there are no harmful effects associated with the low power ultra -high frequency (UHF) radio -wave transmissions used in cellular communications. Several thousands of scientific studies have been reported on the biological effects of exposure to high- frequency radio waves in the same band that provides cellular communications. These studies have been conducted by researchers in university, government, and private laboratories throughout the world. These studies and others that are continually added to the data base pro- vide a large, reliable reservoir of information on levels and durations of exposure - -the kind of information needed to establish the conditions under which exposure does not result in harmful effects and to set exposure limits with a high degree of confidence. The scientific record with respect to radio waves like those used in cellular communications contrasts with the data available on ELF fields, a relatively new area of scientific inquiry. Some epidemiological studies have raised questions about the safety of 50- and 60 -Hz magnetic fields, but these studies, by their very nature, are lacking the strict controls used in laboratory research. Therefore, causal connections cannot be made. In addition, specific levels and durations of exposure to ELF are generally unknown. Not only are laboratory studies of ELF fields comparatively few in number, they have yet to yield the kind of data necessary to establish reli- able exposure limits. Research has shown that biological effects of exposure to RF energy are highly dependent on the frequency as well as the intensity of the fields. The frequencies used in cellular radio waves are fairly high, about 850 millions of cycles per second (850 MHz), so the wavelengths are relatively short, about 14 inches. In marked contrast, the frequency of the fields used in power lines and household wiring is very low, 60 cycles per second (60 Hz), and the wavelength is very long, about 3,000 miles. Consequently, the nature and properties of ELF fields and cellular radio waves are so different that they must be measured and evaluated in different ways. Who has conducted scientific research on exposure to radio waves? Several thousands of scientific studies have been reported on the biological effects of exposure to UHF radio waves, which are used in cellular communications. These studies have been conduct- ed by researchers in universities, government, and private laboratories throughout the world. Who has evaluated the effects of exposure to radio frequency waves? The scientific literature on biological effects of exposure to RF fields has been reviewed and • evaluated by numerous standard- setting bodies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American Nation- al Standards Institute (ANSI), and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measure- ments (NCRP). None of these agencies has identified harmful health effects associated with the low power densities and UHF fields used in cellular -radio transmissions. In 1984, the Environ- mental Protection Agency conducted an extensive inquiry into federal radiation - protection TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROUNA Page 5 guidance. The Agency initially proposed alternatives for controlling public exposure to radio - frequency radiation. Then, for reasons never made public but probably arising from the anti - regulatory stance of the Executive Office at that time, the EPA chose not to inveigh or endorse any system of standards. From 1979 to 1987, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the agency charged with licensing authority over the use of the radio - frequency spectrum, conducted a series of inquiries to determine whether radio - frequency transmissions are a public - health concern. The FCC concluded that cellular communications facilities do not expose the public or workers to unsafe levels of electromagnetic radiation. Are there safety standards to limit exposure to radio frequency radiation? The most widely recognized standards for protection against excessive exposure to radio waves were published by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Radio Frequency Protec- tion Guides (1982, 1992) and by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP), which published Report No. 86 in 1986 as a radio - frequency protection guide. The ANSI has formulated standards for devices and systems that affect every aspect of our safety and well - being. The NCRP is an independent, non - profit body chartered by the United States Con- gress to oversee and evaluate the application of both ionizing and non - ionizing radiation. The scientific committees that develop and maintain exposure standards are comprised of scien- tists from the physical, biological, medical, and engineering sciences. They are primarily uni- versity faculty and federally employed laboratory scientists and physicians, but biomedical inves- tigators from industry, the armed forces, and private research firms are also participants. These experts have the necessary training and background to review and evaluate the scientific litera- ture relating to the biological effects of exposure to radiation. The 1982 ANSI (C95.1) standard took into account differences in energy absorption at various frequencies and time - weighted exposures to establish a limit on the specific absorption rate of four - tenths of a watt per kilogram of body mass (0.4 W/kg). To put this limit in perspective, the resting rate of human metabolism is approximately 1 W /kg of body mass. The threshold for harmful effects is approximately 4 W/kg; therefore, the 1982 exposure standard represented at least a ten -fold safety factor. At ultra -high frequencies (UHF), such as are used in cellular communications, the human body does not absorb as much electromagnetic energy as it does when exposed at very high frequen- cies (VHF). Therefore, the power density limits established for exposure to electromagnetic radiation (expressed in microwatts per square centimeter) vary according to frequency, but both the VHF and UHF power- density limits restrict energy absorption to 0.4 W/kg for the occupa- tionally employed and 0.08 W/kg for members of the general population. Consequently, at VHF frequencies, ANSI standards limit power density to 1,000 microwatts per square centimeter (1,000 p.W /cm whereas at the cellular frequency of 850 MHz, the NCRP and 1992 ANSI standards limit power density to approximately 2800 microwatts per square centimeter (2800 p.W /cm for workers and about 560 p.W /cm for the general population. Power densities at ground level near the Rosedale cellular facility, which range from 0.018 to 1.14 p.W /cm , are well below the permissible exposure limits, At this time, the ANSI and NCRP guidelines for limiting general - population exposure to RF fields are the strictest national standards in the United States. The NCRP exposure guidelines are similar to those of the 1982 ANSI (C95.1) standard except that different exposure limits are recommended for workers and for the general public. The NCRP recommends that the average exposure limits for the public be generally one -fifth that of the limits recommended for workers. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc. • GREENVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA Page 6 The NCRP notes that its two -tier recommendation is more traditional and consistent with past NCRP practices in differentiating between occupational and public exposure by providing for a greater margin of safety for the general public. Therefore, the NCRP standard reduced the maximal permissible exposure level to 0.08 W /kg for the general population. At the cellular frequency of 850 MHz, NCRP standards for the general population limit power density to ap- proximately 560 microwatts per square centimeter (560 µW /cm Once again, the cellular power densities of the Rosedale site are well below the permissible exposure standard. Both the ANSI and the NCRP exposure standards incorporate substantial safety margins to allow for the possibility of unknown or, as yet unproven, effects, and cellular radio -wave transmissions are hundreds to thousands of times below the permissible exposure levels established by these standards. How do we know that there are no unknown effects? It may be true that science has not answered all the questions about the health effects of ex- posures to RF fields. However, after nearly four decades of research on the radio - frequency spectrum, no studies have produced results that link the kind of low- power, ultra- high- frequency signals used in cellular communications with any risk to health. Furthermore, the scientific community has already taken stock of this research to estab- lish objective standards for the prudent control of exposure to electromagnetic fields associated with UHF transmissions. To allow for the possibility of as yet unidentified health effects. both the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) set permissible exposure guidelines at levels at least ten times below thresholds estab- lished for harmful effects. And cellular power densities range from several hundred to a thou- sand times below these prudent science -based guidelines. In addition, these standards are period - ically reviewed and revised to assure that they reflect the latest findings. The periodic review by ANSI and other standard- setting bodies of developments in scientific experimentation assure that electromagnetic issues continue to be addressed on an ongoing basis. Will cellular transmissions aggravate existing medical conditions? There is no evidence that an existin g medical condition can be worsened by exposure to cellular radio -wave transmissions. However, stress from concern or worry about unknown hazards may very well produce physiological changes in the body that can manifest themselves clinically. Stress, often caused by fear of the unknown, increases susceptibility to illness. The best medi- cine is education. Knowledge leads not only to power, but to better health. both physical and mental. Will cellular transmissions interfere with a pacemaker? Pacemakers are not affected by cellular radio waves. The power densities associated with cellu- lar systems are thousands of times less powerful than levels required to produce any effect on a pacemaker. While there have been concerns about interference from high- intensity electromag- netic radiation sources such as microwave ovens, these problems are rare and have been limited to older model pacemakers that were not well shielded. Are transmissions by microwave relays safe? Microwave relays are used at some cell -site locations to transmit signals to other communica- tions facilities, although this link is more often accomplished through the land -line telephone TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVU.LE, NORTH CAROUNA t • • Page 7 network. The use of point -to -point microwave relays allows the cellular network to continue to function when the land -line telephone network has been disrupted, as occurred during the San Francisco earthquake, or to operate in remote areas where conventional telephone service is not available, such as occurred in the Yosemite forest fire. Microwave point -to -point transmission links are located on towers or rooftops, and their dishes are designed to beam signals towards other dishes located high above the ground, well away from areas that would result in human exposure. In addition, they operate at very low power levels of two to three watts. The Federal Communications Commission notes in a bulletin pub- lished by the Office of Engineering and Technology that "...ground -level power densities due to 1 microwave directional antennas are normally a thousand times or more below recommended safety limits...." Il Are portable cellular phones safe? Although the antenna of a portable cellular phone is closer to the body than a car - mounted I antenna, the operating power level is greatly reduced - -a maximum of six - tenths of a watt for the portable compared with three and a half watts for the mobile phone and five to ten watts or more for police, fire and CB radios. There is no scientific evidence that users of portable cellular I phones are exposed to hazardous levels of electromagnetic energy. Extensive tests conducted by one manufacturer found the only potential hazard to occur in the unlikely event that the antenna tip was placed directly on the surface of the eye. Other studies have revealed that exposures to . radio waves from portable cellular phones are well within accepted exposure guidelines. Fur - I thermore, cellular phones comply with standards established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and that agency has determined that their routine operation is unlikely to result in exposures that exceed established safety limits. 1 1 W hat do I do if I have additional questions about exposure to electromagnetic fields? I There is a number of different sources for obtaining additional information on non - ionizing elec- tromagnetic fields. Various federal agencies and departments within the federal government are charged with responsibilities for different aspects of the use and control of electromagnetic energy. A list of the federal agencies, along with a brief description of their areas of responsibili- ty and information on how to contact their offices, is given below: i ti (1) FDA: The Food and Drug Administrations' Center for Devices and Radiological Health . (CDRH), Rockville, MD 20857, can answer questions related to consumer and industrial pro- ducts, such as microwave ovens and industrial RF sealers. (2) EPA: The Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Radiation Programs (401 M. St., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460 or P.O. Box 98517, Las Vegas, Nevada 89193 -8517) performs studies of exposure of the public to RF radiations. (3 OSHA: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Health Response Team (390 Wakara Way, P.O. Box 8137, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108) has been involved in studies related to occupational exposure to RF radiation. However, OSHA has minimal involvement with cellular radio at the present time. (4) NIOSH: The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health maintains a limited pro- gram for studying exposure of workers to non - ionizing radiations. The address is: NIOSH, Physical Agents Branch, 4776 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA Page 8 (5) FCC: The Federal Communications Commission has jurisdiction over the radio - frequency spectrum. They have produced an excellent report entitled Questions and Answers About Biolog- ical Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Radiation, which was written by the Office of Engineering and Technology; Bulletin #56, Third Edition, January, 1989. The Bulletin is available from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161. Questions about potential hazards of FCC - regulated transmitters can be directed to the Spectrum Engineering Division, Office of Engineering and Technology, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554. (6) ANSI: The American National Standards Institute has formulated standards for limiting exposure to radio - frequency radiations for three decades. The address is: ANNSI, 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. (7) NCRP: The NCRP is an independent, non - profit body chartered by the U.S. Congress to oversee the application and control of electromagnetic radiations, both ionizing and non - ionizing. The address is: NCRP, 7910 Woodmont Ave., Suite 1016, Bethesda, Maryland There are other sources of information and assistance regarding electromagnetic energy. A few states maintain non - ionizing radiation programs, or at least some expertness on RF fields. These state activities are usually part of a department of public health or environmental regulation. Also, the list of references at the end of this review should be consulted for detailed information on specific topics related to electromagnetic radiation. There is a large and rapidly growing database of scientific literature on the biological effects of non - ionizing electromagnetic radiations. The most important scientific journal in this field is Bioelectromagnetics, a journal published six times a year by the Bioelectromagnetic Society. Many of the most important scientific findings are published in this journal and evaluated by members of the Society. The Health Physics Journal, published monthly by the Health Physics Society, covers issues that pertain to the health and safety of all forms of radiation, especially those involving high- energy, ionizing sources. There have been a number of reviews of the scientific literature, varying considerably in cover- age and technical detail. The best reviews are in the form of reports, not books. Information on a specific subject is best accomplished through a computerized literature search. There are three large scientific meetings held each year at which many of the scientific investiga- tors present their latest research findings. The meetings of the Bioelectromagnetics Society and the Health Physics Society are typically held in June. The annual Department of Energy/Electric Power Research Institute meeting is typically held in November. All these meetings are open to the public. Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields: A review of the issues presented by alternat- ing- current (ac) power lines can be found in a publication by Dr. M. Granger Morgan, Electric and Magnetic Fields from 60 Hertz Electric Power: What Do We Know About Possible Health Effects? (available from the Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213). Prepared by Don R. Justesen, Ph.D. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA Page 9 GLOSSARY Cell sites (antennas): Cell sites are cellular -radio facilities that transmit and receive radio waves at frequencies between 800 -900 MHz in the ultra -high frequency (UHF) band of the electromag- netic spectrum. A ceil site consists of radio transmitters, receivers, and antennas. The receivers and transmitters are typically housed in small equipment shelters or rooms. The transmitters operate at very low power levels so their signals do interfere with transmissions in adjacent cells. The antennas are most often located on towers or rooftops. A cell site connects with other facili- ties via radio waves that are transmitted to the mobile switching office, which routes the calls to their intended destinations. Electric field: Electric fields represent the forces that electric charges exert on other charges at a distance because of their positive or negative charges. Positive charged particles repel each other, as do negatively charged particles; particles with opposite charges (positive vs.negative) attract each other. These forces of attraction and repulsion are carried from charge to charge through space by the electric field. These charges produce two kinds of fields: electric fields that result from the strength of the charges, and magnetic fields that result from the motions of the charges. When the electric and magnetic fields move through space, they are often referred to as propagating electromagnetic fields. ] Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI): EPRI is a utility organization that funds research, public education, and policy analysis regarding energy technologies that operate at ELF frequen- cies. With respect to electromagnetic energy, their main focus in the last several years has been research and analysis of a potential link between cancer and exposure to 60 -Hz electric and magnetic fields associated with power transmission and distribution systems. Electromagnetic energy: Radiant energy contains both electric and magnetic components, and it travels in a wavelike fashion. This form of energy has no mass and propagates through space at the speed of light. Human exposure to electromagnetic energy is common and comes from a number of natural and manmade sources. For example, the flow of electrical charges within the earth, which accounts for its magnetic field, and the energy from the sun are both constant sourc- es of exposure. Evert the human body generates electromagnetic energy. Common man-made sources include transmission lines, household wiring, home appliances, computers, television, and radio. Electromagnetic energy is differentiated by wavelength or frequency and by its ef- fects on biological materials, which differ markedly across the bands of RF spectrum. Electromagnetic field: Electromagnetic fields are made up of two components: a force similar to the energy surrounding electric charges and a force similar to the energy originating from a magnet. Electromagnetic radiation (EMR): Electromagnetic radiation refers to the propagation of elec- tromagnetic waves through space. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): This Federal agency has responsibility for evaluating the environmental impact of new and existing technologies and for proposing standards, if neces- sary, to ensure the public health and safety. Extremely low frequency (ELF) fields: Electromagnetic energy in the ELF band (30 -300 Hz) is primarily associated in the U,S. with the 60 -Hz electric and magnetic fields produced by electric transmission and distribution systems, by household wiring, and by appliances. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROUNA I • • Page 11 I beyond the head of the user during use. Because the antenna is mounted on top of the hand set, there is normally a two -inch distance between the base of the antenna and the head of the user. Exposure of the head has recently undergone extensive evaluation in the laboratory of Prof. Om 1 P. Gandhi at the University of Utah. His measurements demonstrated that exposure of the brain to UHF energy is well within established safety guidelines. I Hand -held cellular telephones, unlike those used in conventional land -line telephones, do not use permanent magnets or electromagnetic receivers in creating audible signals. Because the hand- held cellular phone uses an electrostatic receiver, the intensity of low- frequency magnetic fields that are incident on the human brain during use of a handset are much more intense for the user of the land -line phone. Although there is no evidence that the intense magnetic fields associated with use of land -line phones pose a health problem, there is irony in a recent recommendation by the FDA that users of hand -held cellular phones should use land -line phones preferentially when Il possible. As alluded to earlier, there are some epidemiological reports that indicate an increased risk of brain cancer and leukemia from exposure to low- frequency magnetic fields. If these reports are valid - -and their validity is currently a matter of intense scientific controversy - -the Il cellular phone should be much the safer device! Power density: The intensity of radio waves at VHF and UHF frequencies is expressed in terms of power density and is commonly measured in units called milliwatts per square centimeter (mW/cm A milliwatt is one thousandth of a watt. Lower power densities, such as those asso- ciated with cellular transmissions, may also be expressed in microwatts per square centimeter (µW /cm or even more likely, in nanowatts per square centimeter (nW/cm A microwatt is Il one - millionth of a watt, and a nanowatt is a billionth of a watt. In contrast, strengths of magnetic fields are expressed in units of amperes per meter (A/M), and the strengths of electric fields are expressed in units of volts or kilovolts per meter (V /m or kV /m). The intensity of magnetic II fields is also commonly expressed in terms of flux density, the appropriate unit of which in the tesla (T). (Magnetic -flux density is also frequently reported in terms of an outmoded unit, the gauss [G], which is not recognized in the International System [S.I.] of units.) 4 Measurements of power density can be made with specific equipment that typically assesses either the electric or magnetic component of the field. The type of instrument and probe selected 111 depends upon what frequencies are being measured and what sensitivity level or range of power one wants to be able to record. Instruments used for official measurements should have been calibrated by an independent laboratory within the past year. Measurements should be taken and recorded by a qualified expert in accord with recommendations made by the National Council on 4 Radiation and Protection in Measurements (NCRP). Use of the wrong instrumentation or opera- _ tion of equipment under conditions other than those recommended by the manufacturer, can result in erroneous readings. Radiation: Any of a variety of forms of energy propagated through space. Radiation may in- volve either particles (for example alpha or beta particles) or waves (for example X -rays, light, radio waves). Ionizing radiations, such as X -rays, carry enough photon energy to break chemical Il and electrical bonds. Non - ionizing radiation does not have sufficient energy to break chemical and electric bonds of biological materials. Cellular telephone systems use non - ionizing electro- magnetic energy. Specific absorption rate (SAR): The time rate at which non - ionizing electromagnetic energy is imparted to a biological body. The SAR takes into account the power density and frequency of the incident radiation, and the body mass and orientation of the radiated subject, to allow calcula- tion of a mass - normalized rate of energy absorption, which is expressed in units of watts per kilogram (W/kg). The SAR is not a thermal measure -- although it can index time rates at which thermal energy is developed, released, or absorbed - -but can serve to index the time rate of any TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc. • GREENVIUF. NORTH CAROLINA Page 12 form of energy transduction. For example, the metabolic rate of a mammal is a complex fusion of bioelectric and biochemical, energy- producing and - consuming transactions; like the SAR, the metabolic rate is measured in units of W/kg. 1 Wavelength: The distance between any two corresponding points on consecutive waves (e.g., peak -to -peak distance). For example, ELF energy has wavelengths of thousands of miles, while point -to -point microwave transmissions have wavelengths of approximately four inches. REFERENCES ACGIH (1983). Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances in the Work Environment, Adopted by ACGIH for 1983 -1984; Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation, American Confer- ! ence of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), The ACGIH, 6500 Glenway Ave., Bldg. D -5, Cincinnati OH 45211. I ANSI (1982). American National Standard Safety Level with Respect to Human Expo sure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz (ANSI C95.11982. American National Standards Institute, 1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018. 1 ANSI (1992). IEEE/ANSI Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. Report No. IEEE /ANSI C95.1 -1992 (The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc., New York). Athey, T.W., et al. (1978). Radiofrequency Radiation Levels and Population Exposure in Urban Areas of the Eastern United States, Technical Report EPA520/2 -77- 008,1978, U.S. 1 Environmental Protection Agency, [NTIS Order No. PB 292 855]. Cleveland, R.F., Jr., and Athey, T.W. (1989). Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in Models of the 1 Human Head Exposed to Hand -Held UHF Portable Radios, Bioelectromagnetics, 10(2). t (1980). Occupational Exposures to Radiofrequency Radiation Curtis, Robert A( ) 0 p oval Exposu es o from FM f Radio and TV Antennas, in Non - Ionizing Radiation: Proceedings of a Topical Symposium, 1980, ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH 45201. EPA (1984). Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, Report No. EPA - 600/8- 83026F, D. Cahill & J. Elder, Eds.). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park NC [NTIS Order No. PB85120848]. 1 Foster, K.P„ and Guy, A.W. (1986). The Microwave Problem, Scientific American, 255 (3). Gandhi, O.P., Ed. (1982). Biological Effects and Medical Applications of RF Electro magnetic Fields, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 30(11). Gandhi, O.P., Ed. (1987). Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 6(1): 1458. Health Physics (1988). Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Radiofrequency Electro magnetic Fields in the Frequency Range from 100 KHz to 300 GHz, Health Physics, 54:115 -123. Sr IEEE (1980). Biological Effects and Medical Applications of Electromagnetic Energy, Pro- ceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 68 (1). TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 1 __—. : –..—..--------. f I Page 10 1 Federal Communications Commission (FCC): The FCC regulates the allocation of the RF spec- trum for public and private communication facilities and devices. The FCC also issues directives concerning the safety of communications systems and equipment. I Food and Drug Administration (FDA): The FDA is responsible for clinical aspects in the produc- tion of consumer and industrial products. The Center for Devices and Radiological Health I (CDRH) is a division of the FDA, and it is responsible for health issues related to cellular tech- nologies. I Frequency: Frequency is the number of times a specified phenomenon occurs within a specified period of time. With electromagnetic waves, it is the number of waves passing a given point during a given time. A unit of frequency is the hertz (Hz) which is a measure of the number of waves or cycles per second. A unit of one thousand is a kilohertz (kHz), a unit of one million is a megahertz (MHz), and a unit of one billion is a gigahertz (GHz). The higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength. Frequencies of cellular radio waves are fairly high, about 850 millions of cycles per second, so the wavelengths are relatively short, about 14 inches. 1 Frequency is often used to characterize a particular type of electromagnetic energy. For exam- ple, extremely -low frequency (ELF) is used to describe the 60 -cycle (60 -Hz) energy associated I with power lines; very-high frequency (VHF) waves are commonly used to transmit radio and television broadcasts (30 -300 MHz), and cellular systems as well as UHF television and other services operate in the ultra -high frequency band (300 -3,000 MHz). 1 Hertz (Hz): A unit used to measure frequency expressed as one cycle per second. In the U.S., alternating current (AC) has a frequency of 60 Hz. In most of Europe, alternating current has a frequency of 50 Hz. Radio waves in current commercial or military use range in frequency from I tens of Hz to thousands, millions and billions of hertz; X -ray frequencies range in the billions of billions of Hz. Units of one thousand, one million, and one billion Hertz are abbreviated, respec- tively, as KHz (kilohertz), MHz (megahertz), and GHz ( gigahertz). II Ionizing electromagnetic radiation: Electromagnetic energy at a frequency beyond the far ultra- violet and high enough to separate electrons from atoms is called ionization radiation. X -rays I and gamma rays are common types of ionizing electromagnetic radiation. Cellular telecom- munication radio waves do not ionize biological tissues. Magnetic field: When electric charges move they create additional forces on each other. These 1 additional forces are carried through space by magnetic fields. A magnetic field represents the forces that a moving charge exerts on other moving charges because they are moving. All elec- tric currents produce magnetic fields. 1 National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement. The NCRP is a nonprofit corpora- ' tion chartered by Congress to collect, analyze, develop, and disseminate information and recom- I mendations about (a) protection against radiation and (b) measurements, quantities, and units of radiation. This organization coordinates their activities with other national and international • organizations. i N Non - ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIEMR): Electromagnetic energy at frequencies below the far ultraviolet. NIEMR does not possess sufficient photon energy to strip electrons from • biological molecules (ionization). Television, radio waves (including those of cellular radio), L and microwaves are all common examples of NIEMR. Portable cellular phones: Portable, hand -held cellular phones resemble in size and form the familiar cordless hand set. The antenna is located on the top of the hand set and protrudes TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS • Lawrence Behr Associates, Inc • GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA • Agenda Item: 2.1 Hearing Date: March 25, 1996 Time: 7:00 PM BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON I, APPLICATION SUMMARY CASES: FILE NAME: WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0001 PROPOSAL: A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a cellular communications monopole. APPLICANT: Western PCS Corporation 7535 -B NE Ambassador Place Portland, OR 97201 OWNER: Irwin Schimmel 14020 SW 72nd Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I - L) ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I -L) LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL, subject to the following conditions. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In recognition of the findings staff recommends that the Hearings Officer approve Conditional Use Permit CUP 96 -0001 subject to the following requirements: ALL CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS. 1. The applicant shall submit a revised site and landscaping plan that shows provision for the following: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. a. The applicant shall demonstrate that as a part of the lease agreement that they are entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The applicant shall also provide a landscaping irrigation plan unless a landscape architect finds that this is not necessary. b. The applicant shall revise the plan to provide arborvitae landscaping to screen the equipment structures from view of the adjoining freeways. c. The applicant shall revise the plan to indicate that those areas which are to accommodate a service vehicle are to be paved. III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Property History: The property is currently developed with a construction equipment rental facility. In 1990 at the request of the property owner, the site was rezoned from Planned Industrial I -P to Light Industrial I -L. The City has no record of any other recent land use applications having been submitted for this developed property. The applicant has proposed to develop the cellular monopole to improve cellular phone service for the 1 -5 and Highway 217 corridors and surrounding areas. Vicinity Information: The subject parcel is approximately eight acres. The area which is to be leased for this purpose consists of approximately 525 square feet of the eight acre site. The proposed monopole site to be leased is rectangular in shape and measures approximately 15 feet by 35 feet. The affected portion of the site is relatively level and was previously paved. Site Information and Proposal Description: The site is located approximately 450 feet south of the south east corner of SW North Dakota Street and SW Scholls Ferry Road. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 2 Existing Uses and Structuu: The subject property is currently developed for use as an equipment rental commercial facility. The area proposed to be leased for development of the antenna would be a small portion of the site located approximately 190 feet to the east of the main commercial equipment rental building. The proposed monopole pad site is also not presently used for other existing site activities such as equipment storage, driveways or service areas. Surrounding Land Uses: The monopole site is immediately surrounded on all sides by the Power Rents equipment rental facility. Generally the entire Power Rents site is surrounded on all sides by other industrial uses with exception of the area to the east of the site which is the Interstate 5 Freeway. IV. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS: Section 18.70 (Development Standards) allows Utilities subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The Development Code defines uses such as the proposed antenna tower as a utility which is a conditionally permitted use within the Light Industrial (I -L) Zoning District. Section 18.70 does not specify a minimum parcel size or width requirement for a parcel within the I -L Zone. For these reasons and because the applicant has not proposed to purchase the subject property, the site meets the minimum development site requirements of the I -L Zone. Section 18.70 does not require that setbacks be provided other than from the centerline of certain streets, within clear vision areas and for parking lot screening purposes. These standards either do not apply due to the nature of the proposal or are addressed elsewhere within this report. Section 18.70 specifies that a maximum height of 45 feet is permitted for habitable structures. Section 18.98 provides an exemption from height limits for all non - habitable structures. Section 18.70 specifies that the minimum landscaping requirement shall be 15 percent. Fifteen percent of the leased area of the site is 79 square feet. The applicant has proposed an arborvitae hedge to be planted within a four foot area around three sides of the actual lease hold area. The area to be landscaped exceeds the minimum 15% area standard, however, the applicant shall demonstrate that as a part of the lease agreement that they are entitled to plant landscaping outside the leasehold area. The applicant shall also demonstrate how the proposed landscaping will be irrigated where necessary. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 3 • • Section 18.100 (Landscaping and Screening) provides standards for landscaping and screening for between uses of varying intensity. This section does not provide specific land use buffers between a utility use and the existing surrounding industrial uses. Section 18.102 (Visual Clearance) requires that a visual clearance area be maintained along the intersections of all public and private right -of -ways. Because the location of the fenced pad area is not at the intersection of two (2) driveways, the fence and other site improvements are not subject to the clear vision standards. Section 18.106 (Parking) does not specify a specific parking ratio for this type of utility use. Section 18.106.050.J.1 specifies that with the exception one and two family residential dwelling units, temporary uses and fleet storage uses that all areas to be used maneuvering of vehicles shall be paved. The applicant has provided a concrete pad around the monopole which complies with this standard. The applicant has also proposed graveled areas around the pad. The Development Code does not allow the use of gravel for any area which is designed for maneuvering of vehicles. The applicant shall revise the site plan to indicate that those areas which are to accommodate a service vehicle are to be paved. Section 18.106 (Bicycle Facilities) requires one bicycle parking space is for each 15 required automobile parking spaces. Because this site is intended to be an unstaffed utility and no parking spaces are required this standard is not deemed to be applicable. Section 18.108.080 (Vehicular Access) does not provide a minimum driveway width standard for driveway access to utility facilities. Because the proposal is not planned to be a staffed installation and is to be located within a paved service area of an existing commercial development, the existing commercial type driveway from SW 72nd Avenue complies with the Community Development Code access requirements. Because no minimum entrance width is specified for access to an unstaffed utility installation, the eight (8) foot wide chain Zink gate is acceptable as proposed. Section 18.108 (Pedestrian Circulation) requires that a pedestrian walkway extend from the ground floor entrances from commercial and industrial development to the streets which provides the required pedestrian access and egress. Because the site is proposed to be an unstaffed utility facility this standard is not deemed to be applicable to this proposal. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Became effective on January 26, 1992. The act requires one disabled person parking space if one (1) to twenty -five (25) parking spaces are provided. Because this type of facility does not require parking spaces to be provided, no handicapped accessible parking space is required. The Building Department will review the site for compliance with other provisions of the ADA prior to the issuance of Building Permits. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 4 Section 18.120.180 Sites Development Review) This section requires that a re ( P ) q development proposal be found to be consistent with the various standards of other Community Development Code. The applicable criteria in this case are Sections 18.70, 18.98, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. The proposal has been reviewed for consistency with these sections elsewhere within this report. The proposal contains no elements related to the provisions of Code Chapters 18.94 (Manufactured/ Mobile Home Regulations), 18.134 (Variance), 18.144 (Accessory Use and Structures), 18.150 (Tree Removal) which are also listed under Section 18.120.180.A.1. These sections are, therefore, found to be inapplicable as approval standards. Section 18.120.180.A.2 provides other Site Development Review approval standards not necessarily covered by the provisions of the previously listed sections. These standards are also found not to be applicable or have been addressed immediately below. Section 18.120.180. A.4 (a -b) (Screening From Adjoining Properties) - The applicant has proposed arborvitae plantings around the proposed facility on three (3) sides as viewed from the Power Rents site. It is recommended that this same type of landscape material be provided to screen the equipment structures from view of the adjoining industrial uses. Section 18.130.040 (Conditional Use Permits) contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1) The site size and dimensions provide: a. Adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatment to mitigate possible adverse effects from the use on surrounding properties and uses. 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5) The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 Site Development Review are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The use as revised through the recommended Conditions of Approval complies with all site development standards set forth for the Commercial Professional Zoning District. The property is physically separated from residential areas due to its location. Proposed landscaping will partially screen the ground mounted equipment from view. The monopole itself has been designed to blend into the background as much as possible. The pole is to be constructed of a galvanized finish which would match other light poles which are constructed nearby to illuminate the 217 /Interstate 5 interchange. STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 5 The applicant has not re uested that public facilities be ma available to serve this PP � t P development as proposed. All applicable standards of the zoning district are met by this proposal as reviewed within this staff report. The use is defined as a Minor Impact Utility due to the type of proposed facility. The locational criteria for a Minor Impact Utility is that the site have access to a minor collector street. The site is proposed to be provided within an easement to a commercial driveway which provides direct access to SW 72nd Avenue which is designated as a Major Collector Street. Traffic will not be routed through local streets to access this facility. The antenna facility will not generate substantial traffic, light or other impacts because the facility will be an unstaffed utility site. The development of this facility will not generate large scale construction impacts due to the type of improvements which are planned. The site will also not require a parking lot. The applicant has also proposed to blend the antenna into the area and reduce the visual impact of the antenna through the planting of shrubs. The antenna itself is described in the applicants submittal as being a neutral galvanized finish so as to not draw attention to the structure. No other unique natural features have been noted on this site. The property is level and requires no significant grading or engineering to develop the site as proposed. The applicant has not proposed to develop a site larger than needed for the proposed use which maximizes energy efficiency and convenience. PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS: Section 18.164 (Streets and Utilities) contains development standards for streets and utilities. The Engineering Department has reviewed the street and public utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin a public street, no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. Because the applicant has proposed only to extend electrical service and may need to extend water service to the site, no conditions have been recommended concerning the provision of public utilities to the site. V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal and had no comments or concerns. • STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 6 VI. CIT & AGENCY AMMENTS • The Land Use Subcommittee for the East Citizen Involvement Team was notified of the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The Involvement Team has not provided any comments or objections to this development. In addition, applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting regarding this request. No other comments were received by the Planning Division. VII. CONCLUSION The Planning Division concludes that the Conditional Use request for this existing site will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state and federal laws. 3/14/96 PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts DATE Associate Planner ( __ 4/96 __ APPROVED BY Richard Bewersdo DATE Senior Planner STAFF REPORT TO THE H.O. CUP 96 -0001 - WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PAGE 7 • • • • if • _—DD_ -s - • -° . w it SST emir war I MR !D._.De.._DD a. •ii, , W 4/ o iiii II D. • . TYPICAL Mt SECTION • ea .............. . SS . m 4 sr - me ono ha Dl a 11 '.'11 111 I'- If'.0 =1 - Aill 1 1 a. ........ NYC .err _ D� 7 .O MOMS Mil . r-r !-f CI i § r � r� rr r Cr • Y Y v t 1 r� 1 _ __ Q ♦ � 1 t P. 8 .e.. e c_p I - ....... V • DrfEM= / * * lk * * ' s '. \'' • I W.I. • n ...® ss..r • - ._ m a DDf rr' mL OO D DI.m/ ._sn r me[ ._m .nr o ROOM a. m 2 . SUM= 113 as.nta • MOMS . 0 e® r._ MOMS r'MI Inc. .ROIL u m m ..4 .. MS SOS \ ' • . / ' • U PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP CUP96 -0001 Western PCS Corp. Monopole • 0 I i •St 1 \ ! . l ill RR LP 0 ■ 1 •1 1 "ii ! , 1116 i 1 \--. 7 I lilli 1 C 1 ! I E r a I ,,,,,,.. 0111111U ...: ' SANCIN ARG S'T , 0 '0 TFCH C.FNTFR CY) ■ C -S. .. — , C ; vr‘r\x, -ir • CU ' alumE61s :6 110i4 , • CI -4 C >• . Sti■ ' . . •,!. (13 " .;• .. 1 \\\ - ,---..'------ t? — 0) a Immo H . 4r kali 7 ... BONI TA RD _ ›N _ - ••••...._ - 1•1•i/ • um= • . 0 , . . III Vicinity Map CUP 96-0001 ,A, Western PCS Corp. Monopole Note: Map is not to scale N . _ .. • • CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER MARCH 25, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. OF J I CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD OREGON TIGARD, OR 97223 El, anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign -in sheet(s). PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Planning Commission meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639- 4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: ➢ Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and ➢ Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the. Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. (OVER FOR MEETING AGENDA ITEM(S) TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE I OF 2 3/25/96 PUBLIC HEARING hapattp \masters \agendho.mst • • CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER MARCH 25, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to develop a cellular communications monopole. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I -L) ZONING DESIGNATION: Light Industrial (I -L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.120, 18.130 and 18.164. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER PAGE 2 OF 2 3/25/96 PUBLIC HEARING h: \patty \masters \aeendho.ntst • • ,A CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: February 27. 1996 TO: Brian Rager. Development Review Engineer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 _ ➢ WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE Q ■ A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). ZONE: Light Industrial (I -L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 7. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning. Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: ? iP 44 ► Ts �� L -S c -j, sa-AC. v a<- ADD A SbI EARS stzT cv.t "VA S St11✓ . (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: , (Z `((ol I Phone Number(s): • CUP 96 -0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS • Co .I • we our mem at 11M In 11.Mia mew =MINA aolla am lom. eo maYT® mmr P.m 111. Ma on manal•M mil .� - - -� w 1 1 I' ___.. we o ��w a � 1 1 ��r•ea.Ye a —. I 'F � � I 1 sw� • Ya.ov.� 1 .. TYPICAL SITE SECTION i ® ISOM SO Y.If eq T. el it at OQS WORM= .. ■ m r.s a.o..o n DIM o �:�. a- • � � /— = ....................• ■ ii\..j Y - l ► I I 1 • __ • ' miltfiM....".:::•:".•::•::•:•:•. • 1 t 11 Ili is wawa wea=r mat some woo= w mat woad WIZ o UM woe= — MM O •10911111111 COMM U .a 1 um"( w M w.w• f mu we.= f •• gni Mel 4 m MCC wwoa = 1m F }" 7..711; t E IF c p� • F ■ t 1 IR'( ta i►__: .s _ o ► i s . ve • .. i immi _ 0 PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP CUP 96 -0001 Western PCS Corp. Monopole • 0 i . , , , 1-1-11-] i , 14-• , . -- _All ; lin Q F E P )E1 -- 1271- c ! ' — ka TI 1 1 1 1 f ,UnRuRG, ci i 1 I a) 0 0 . .. ..,.... : 0), III P ib :A \ 6 r wA i T 1 A 1.C: E ' , c . co rv IP ti:\ N, ;DANMARK! N 11 ' p q ca iicy 411' •-•-...1 -On ...-. 4 I i 1 . ... ------- BONITA RD 1 , , r t ..........\ Ivor . ....., , . 1 Vicinity Map A , CUP 96-0001 Note: Map is not to scale Western PCS Corp. Monopole _ N 1 • • CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER. AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, MARCH 25. 1996 AT 7:00 PM. IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER. 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD. TIGARD. OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 FILE TRLE: WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE APPLICANT: Westem PCS Corporation OWNER: Irwin Schimmel 7535B NE Ambassador 14020 SW 72nd Avenue Portland, OR 97201 Tigard, OR 97224 (503) 284 -8714 (503) 620 -1235 REQUEST ➢ The applicant requests Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. ZONE: Light Industrial (I -L). THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684 2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER CUP 960001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 3125196 HEARINGS OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING • MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER MARCH 4, 1996, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SPECIFICITY TO AFFORD THE DECISION MAKER AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO THE ISSUE PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS (25t) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. _ •• 1111 -Ira" -1 1 110 �� � � CUP 96-0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE NOTICE OF 3/25/96 HEARINGS OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING RECEIVED PLANNING • �/ FEB 271996 ,\ CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: February 27. 1996 TO: Kelley Jennings. Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 _ ➢ WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE < _ A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). ZONE: Light Industrial (I - L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 7. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting - �.�� Phone Number(s): CUP 96-0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • i ( 41 \m- .44 4,"0 RECEIVED PIANNING CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS MAR ®4 1996 DATE: February 27. 1996 TO: Development Services Technicians FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 - 4171 Fax: (503) 684 - 7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 > WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE Q A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). ZONE: Light Industrial (I -L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will / be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you-wish to comment on this / application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 7, 1996. You may use the space provided/ below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: — 1 � d A.e/L.a/ ,A111,1111 itAeld.5 R. a,ia r :4 J ; 0 r14--ti cem d CirOJC-- (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 96 -0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS • •RECEIVED PLANNING FEB 2 9 1996 ���IAd�I��� CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: February 27. 1996 TO: David Scott. Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 - 4171 Fax: (503) 684 - 7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 96 -0001 > WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE < A request for Conditional Use Permit approval to construct an unmanned cellular communications tower. LOCATION: 14020 SW 72nd Avenue (WCTM 2S1 01 DD, Tax Lot 800). ZONE: Light Industrial (I -L). APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.70, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.130 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Thursday - March 7. 1996. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: L S _ Jl I Phone Number(s): 31\ CUP 96 -0001 WESTERN PCS CORPORATION MONOPOLE PROPOSAUREOUEST FOR COMMENTS . 1 4' • i s , • R •.1 -4 • `,.i ',,,2r' .'fi pcs ((MAJOR 7535 NE AMBASSADOR PL.,, SUITE .B -. ,'.. u fix: . PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 ' ' .,. '-� • PHONE 503 284 -2255 ;_ � '. 1 - FAX (503 284 - 0402 ' ''''' ., ij _ i � plio iiIlliiJii ! pllill�i!in IIIIII11 l IIII 0,111 IptI !IIlItj' - : � . j � I i IIIIII �,u�� I�,ll� I 111111,a M �; i • . :; 1 I, I It I I,ill+l I I �IIII l,i l- hdu . � # : b., 4 t ( t I • Ili lid iii,„ I,iuu�.hi +i Ii(i 11l gl UuI;,1l;ll � ' 111 III I I li "• �;; 1:;: ? , y , , �.. ' 1 ' 1 t: `t , . , . i t + J•• t y b Cx5'S1N6 M[STFRN - . Pave . � SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION PARCEL 23- 81 i10 � " � Tatra PARKNO AREA 1},p SITE NAME: [K6Tr,0 tp•CC DUSTIN0 1 °-. : + r' a < 7 \ M[7�C 7_. 1-4 a�u X \ lf—• c X�. - -- — ---X� — teo.to' N� ?05.,x• 1 - -�t a 1-5 & ROUTE 217 Sr r r ,, r . ,3y 5k ' a,IPL(.NT Y PAOPOxu to st TANA , i 1 ((MAJOR r r,6 • DATE 11/21/95 r C ,'. I e 1 r REVISIONS aaTMO f I ,.. BUILC* 0 ._/ I I N0. DATE ISSUE • t toCCH G , auke TIIO1r71 ( r - a , Ta,otw,T YH+6 77777/-1 / 1 11/29/95 PRELIMINARY . > ` cx T110 ,cNct / •/� X w , , '' ' )11$1*03 4 / F- 12/04/95 CITY SUBMITTAL '' " ' 1 / � SITE NUMBER: T s '{ • 1 ?/08 /93 CITY SUBMITTAL. �" "'` : 1 a / I � r . i - ' 7 r r • , L. .....x_ •TALON / / I € } " . •. _ , P O 1316 D / / /Rl ii J .b : �- C ;, ice . , I 041,4 Ftw:II ...../ ..._ _. . _. -- —• - N -- X" i37 1 v --- -M-- -- ...pc X- --- —n -- - C --1 TW Ct —,. � z , ; :,,; i t _ f i 00 t a . i e ::: , \ I • '''' 4 ^ C ' • t1 • , 0 De. 17150 SW. UPPER BOONES r a . ' • f •1 ,1 DURHAM, OREGON 97223 �� ' FXRRY • • (603) 620 -9870 . ;` I asi • : — Y ' . • . - NOTES: 1) SITE PLAN FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES >`;x;; ONLY; 00 NOT SCALE 2) FOR PROPERTY LINE LENGTHS AND ONT) . , .:„,. ....:,.4 BEARINGS, SEE EXISTING SITE SURVEY [ i OVERALL SCALE 1 1 VERALL SITE PLAN _ tr[� f °- (.44 : •,lw u lh ,,� ,, , , ", ``. 3706 497 714 A/c AIR CONDITIONING cRNO GROUND KO REQUIRED 1 � 'a . _ � _ � :r ; - 4 , _ , . � ` ., i � " � � 3 f AAi. ADJUST cYPSUM MALI eO RM RooM ` � ,, f • lip SITE NAME; SATE ? U 18ER; NU DESCRIPTION; 1 SITE MUE MI ADM FINISH FLOOR GYP. B0. GYPSUM BOARD R.O. ROUGH OPENING • : - ., _ ifs "' i -- -. _ I► ' A . 16 10 ,af_' 7 ' f � i 1 4 j - �!;•• Ictor MATELY ALVAR INC. • ' 4 l _ ' ° t 3 � ' . 15 do Rte. 217 PO -1316 D ASTM AAMERICAN AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR � .. � ,v Nv,t� ,r t _ 'F • al _ � � a � j. -• � •° - APPROX. APPROXI , • TESTING AND MAERIALS HARO'w0 HAROw000 SHT SOU 384 FOREST AVE. /�'L �' __I m _Le„ ,Y`,•„ ...„,, r. A"c AMERICAN w ' cAUCERtz' HORIZONTAL SM. L LAG UNA BEACH, CA 92651 \ �F + � — N –N17 T / r,,,;,., SITE ADDRESS; OWNER; T -1 TITLE SHEET, OVERALL SITE PLAN, BLDG. BUILDING M. HEIOFIT I:c� • GENERAL INFORMATION r Ave. POWER RENTS R "; ,'1 TANO E TEL 714)497 8197 -- - r .. w n A AIR CONI - , 0 Ave. AOa STEEL FAX (– t „ -$ L3 ' -ter • 4_ i 9/3 BUILD NC STANDARD STRUC /. STRUCTURAL ) i - -� a w . $ $ t ' TIGARD, OR 97223 A -1 ROOF PLAN, ENLARGED ROOF PLAN ' ' I.O. INSIDE DA. SUSP. SUSPENDED - - - cic cEnnNG IN. INCH sv. SHEET VNYL CONTACT: MARIO ALVAREZ i a's ' '' A KK 'I 36 � , ... . , A • ', ti4 ►,, "'n t ,. APPLICANT; ti A -2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, DETAILS 1 SITE NUMBER 1 'A W. CLEAR INFO NFORUADO N WSUL INSULATION THRU THROUGH +: '..* z ,Tutu , sr AI NIµ t WESTERN PCS C OR P OR ATI ON - ` x. '' CONC. CONCRETE t INT. INTERIOR tww a CO dl �� CONT. CONSTRUCTION > T.O.C. T CC CONCRETE - t , • ` .Q �„ �� � ut' T ��, , , �� r ` PORTLAND OGON AMBASSADOR 97220 PLACE, SUITE B r + POUND(S) S TAIL TOP Of MASONRY ` * '� '� at Cl. ,rt Al , y '�� t • B(S) i -•1 : �: • oe� DOUBLE TYP TYpIoL SURVEY _ � ! « ' •� >.. � CONTACT _ •.a�, _ ,� �” ' i ; , "L '� ; Ka, WPCS): COLE GRAVES TEL 503 - 284 -2255 PO- 1310 -D . �': Du, • D OUBLE R u,,,X M ¢R ':. v - =•m • CONTACT (1(011): CHIP HEWETT TEL 503- 284 -2255 ` NECH UNIFORM BUILDING DRAG DIAGONAL uCCww►rx WC ) y - f 3 : lip `� - - i t , aM. ouENSaN MET, MIL uETAI CooE SURVEYOR �` ` '' '' y I Tr>r • t ON DO ti►TN MFR. MANUFACTURER LING UNLESS NOTED J 1, 1(f w 31 C PROJECT DESCRIPTION; OT1, DELL DETAIL I,OR MANu+CER OTHERWISE ADDRESS . ' ' al .' ,'` w :, I 6 i r , ' ; • owc. oRAwINC Mw ultluVM :�,:\ .a..._ ? W r _ . • 1 p k AN UNMANNED RADIO TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING ME ADDRESS ;,',' j ; :` u MNSCE LANEOUS ART. vERTICAL CITY, STATE ZIP > > , _ U L , . OF A THREE — SECTOR ANTENNA ARRAY WITH (3) ANTENNA PER , • :. „ l �" '° " k w ,I ' rW " ' SECTOR (9 TOTAL) MOUNTED ON AN EX ISTING PENTHOUSE AN SHEET INDEX E LAST vet VERIFY TIME FIELD • « c . 1 I it � �: • 3 , - �� I� a ;`, � • I ( ) • r , * , " TEL TELEPHONE t ''' �' �' FREE STANDING ANTE NNA MOUNTS WITH TRANSMITTER EQUIPMENT EL. ELEV ELEVATION N NORTH – T T NA NOT APPLICABLE FAX "{'i - - °f • 1 `nI "°"' T e . 14020 S.W. 72 A <:m ELECT ELECTRICAL w WES FAX UN �' `�� °' - 1 a : I�,I� 1 � .� � MOUNTED ON EXIST ROOF Eat E E Ot iPt(N ►N NOT T CONTRACT ww wrr W #' '° .. � . t,,,. w i � t" w Z ;41 :5 :' I: i .t. TIGARD, OR 97223 .a .. f� EQUIP. T Nn No o SCALE CONTRACT [ . -, y ZONING • AREA OF PARCE PARCEL NUMBER(S) EW EACH WAY W/o wITNOUT CONTACT: CONTACT },� sY �,� + tom" 1I I ���• "`r. '' !ST EXISTING ,F A s . � L. j QOCU NT iEltE11� EXTERIOR L010 CTr ' `s ' l METER FINISH OPENING j •� i FLUOR. FLUORESCENT OPP OPPOSITE & µ0 ?• T r U TILITIES • FT FLOOR O. CENTER UNE �-, - -fling � ` F . - I r? E ELECTRICAL UTILITY: PGE OWNER �E-- -- SHEET TITLE ` ';; PLYWO. PLYW000 , ( K. i` I , T CA GAUGE R PROP LINE • "t �. _ _ - - - , PR PAIR ° • TEL. f ` GALV GALVANIZE (D) PROD PROJECT 0 AT ' ' , �' I i 1 I - - CONSTRUCTION . :C ; ;¢. `Y y ' �' --- -��- -- GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR Pt PRESSURE TRFATEO NUMBER t •,- `, Li _ c' wb f1, „.• rrn,c .D � _ ,, - PROP PROPERTY T TELEPHONE UTILITY: GTE OPERATIONS ;»+ .�• TITLE SH , = I iNJ i 1 1 °r ; + . � ;,l w� . :I w. F ` TEL REAL ESTATE * Q REVISION (100 ROOM NUMBER .: W r � - d rr - 4 I .) � ,� � "� � ” FIRE DEPARTMENT: RF ENGINEER "' OVERALL SIT PLAN , i),, t , ,• u v V at c � +Iw,t Swat i . , ■ ,*t 1 • 4-. TEL: ' KEY NOTE 21 KEYED NOTE al A t I 1 s • -( z, . 3 ZONING —our--- GENERAL INFO , i : : } ❑ F I 12 1 . # GENERAL INFORMATION, LANDLORD Y ` 4 • 4 N — max -- ' Q)-- DETAIL REFERENCE SECTION REFERENCE � �' !' l , `' ,,K,, ; ro ";► 1. PARKING REQUIREMENTS ARE UNCHANGED ;k '� �' _ t ' , R : i . , ., 2. TRAFFIC IS UNAFFECTED -- �,�- -- SHEET NUMBER w ti r ''t , ;,, k 'a 3. NO SIGNAGE IS PROPOSED : REFERENCE " — A, 4. NO IT RAIN IS PROPOSED �� { . G r SITE GRADING G S ` ® ELEVATION T HOMAS GUIDE - 1994 ED ____ T. (MAP SOURCE: T 1 - r +� _' a a ABBREVIATIONS 8c SYMBOLS CONS U L TANT T VICINIT M PAGE 655 .GRID GS N.T,s. P ROJECT SUMMARY APPROVALS . ; • • 1 A . PLOT SCALE f :1" .1* „1 i •',,,fi,, • .• .. . - „,. r 6 _ - Y _ • •. , 4 _ ©ASS PL., SUtTF B` • ORTt_AN0, OREGON ADQR 972'20 • } PNQNE 503 284 --225 . , FAX 0503 28 --Q4o2 .. . _, i ,. . . ... 2. . . ' 1 .. , ..... „,_ ., .2 .. 2 , ... _, 2 € f _, .. ..„....,, .... .,.. .., .„.....'s' r .. - , F { .. P F'' P ..1-1:!:i;,-"-:'' Fa T - - ' ”- - COMMERCIAL ZONE ; . p ',.- . • . ' ' .`.. 1TE NAME. . : s WELL LA IDSCAPED = . , .. . _ • EXISTING , SALEM FREEWAY SUBDIVISION PARCEL 23-81 WESTERN 4 _ FAMILY -1 EXISTING EXISTING OFFICES • EXISTING FENCE PARKING DRAINAGE -- (2- STORIES ` # w' , DATE APRIL 3rd, 1996 4 1 EXI T!I� G _ " AREA DITCH 120_ LIGHT 170.45' 27. .69' 260.2 233.i0 POLE .. - :' -� - . , REVISIONS • W. 5 FO S 01? - , -, 1 z EQUIPMENT YARD PROPOSED 11/29 PREUMINAR W SED LEASE AREA • i, Y :; ' 4 , Ji i 2'297" EQUIP ENT Y • 'D - r 12 /04/95 REVISION , 1 EXISTING • .• :• . 1.. * BU • rL X Z POE PAVED SE' CE VEHICLE AREA =: PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TRE{4CH - : ' ,1 u ■ 12/O6 93' REYI$IONS `: W EXISTING FENCE RENTS > EQUIPMEN YARD BUILDING P0OSED UNDJGROUND TREINCH 12/13/95 REVSIONS 3 PARKING I 12/1/95 CITY SUE3ITTAL' ° ' i E 71N� . 1 5 9� . . PR UMINAY . 12 r / / C4NSTR N EXISTING ' .. E QUI PM ENT YAR 2 9 ' OLE (v FUELING ' i ~ 4 /3 /s ' LANDSCPE` REYfOr�t //1/� EXt STIN G DRIVEWAY SUPPLY`. „ X )( i - ----; F )< )( .. i 10/00s --- - EXISTING EXSTING FENCE f' . { ' 1710 SW.- UPPR 600N S :~FERRY RD DURHAM, .OREGON 97 . t. (503) 284 -2255 EXISTING COMMERCIAL ARA N TES: • CO \ 1) SITE PLAN FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES rO ONLY; DO NOT SCALE :Q 2) FOR PROPERTY LINE LENGTHS AND ¢ BEARINGS, SEE EXISTING SITE SURVEY • OVER L SITE PN ScAL� " 120' - - •---- — --- - — D 1 * , y £ - ' GYPSUM WAIL BOARD 0'D R A RCQTECT �� . H H FOOR GYP. BD > M B AA '' R O. ROUGH OPEN l�� R e E k3E DESCRIPTION X. APPROXIMATELY TELY _ t r } R e SITE NAM ALVAR I+ • i r r , FOR NC j0L5EN GROUP a ` � ' -�`�`•� , � � • &Rte. 217 PO --1318 LY5 �q N M T HARD WD HARDWOD S SOUTH ,�. a.�i o- = -, T -1 AJr , 17150 5W UPPER B00NES FERRY RD. _.y t 3 a mO TITLE SHEET, OVERALL. SITE PLAN, HR I sM SIMILAR DURHAM OREGO . � a ' f GENE INF RM T BLDG BLcG HT. HOW SPEC. sPECTtoH N 97223 `� ' ; 4 a � i - S� T QQS . OV�NF = RAL 0 A ION �- '' BLK. BLOCK HVAC HEATING, VENTING MIO So SQUARE ` < ii , _ AIR c a O S $QU E ESS STEEZ T Y � . r r i ;s t C — f SURVEY I &bSE !a10$AE RA010 TKM L• (0) 284 -2255 r, r , / 4020 S 7 6 2 nd Ave. POWER RENTS "�' Q s ens ON DiAG SLAMDARD FAX: (543) 284 - 040 � � y .° ' i '` a ; 4 T1Gg 0>�. 97 14020 S.W. 72nd Av cD SLfSP SUSPE1d0ED . ; ' C - i - � r .- . a A -1 ENLARG SITE PLAN SITE SECT CLC cEN I.D. DH Sv. st Et V1111 V1111 . 4 z ; f 3 t ' 5 TIGARD OR 7223 M cLR. cxE�R INFO INFORMATION CONTACT: JOHN CRAIG ( =F �, , * • , ,, ` �, APP��AT' ELEVATIONS �ONC. CONCRETE Mt. TKYd , r , T it mist CO SrRUCTxw ' � o y z CONT. CANTINUOUS CNETE EiE a n t T . 1,. -Y . , ", i A 2 s Pal s . TOP MSY - , _ . :T g - 1 7 . A5SADORPLA, SUTE @ CONSTRUCTION Ot�TAILS r 53 5 : NE ' AM TYP TYPICAL ' ''= ` PORTLAND, ORGON 9722(} MAX SURVEYOR ti Vi ' ' a ' - 1 n ' : CONTACT WPC5) OiE gg: : 2255 E ELE9CAL NOTES, SERVICE P vECH LLEt 4 WORM BUILDING Gt. 1 . � COOS 1- . _ c , / �� i� J�� , , MEC 111! L METAL \ ,0i - N -, d .. P ` n s :•.t Y , ,.., � • F C' " . , ♦ :M ^:.fY 4 _ - 1 - , . �' CONTAC KOLL }: J J NORRISSEY TEL: 8714 ' - al DOWN MFR. ww1.FACTURFR L040 UNLESS NOTED DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ' ' ► "_ r DETAN � 4( ' % 7 ,s' . t,. , i OETML O MGR ►MANAGER .- J GT D SCR PTI N E 2 GROUNDING PLAN, DETAILS Z N � Q 7 " w r� 4.i , • US VERT, VERTICA POft Vi, ' e , � ., _, (Y EAST VP VERIFY FIE1D F TI AND, OREGON 97201 -4830 - W. , r: :. , 1.. ' : w *� - T if �lYE SECTOR ) E ACH V INYL TILE t P . ,. ? . x .. 1— ELEV ELY - .. O A ANTENNA EL, Aatwt K MaRTH TEL: 503 r. ,. r _ t T } NEW MONOPOLE WiTN. THE 223 6663 °' q. , ` .,T" .)` , t '. .1 SECTOR s TOTAL) MOUNTED ON A N x SHEET INDEX ,[ � EL ECT ELECTRICAL NA MOT M^PUCAeLE .. + A :. TRANSMITTER . EQUIPME MO NT A S N w = E+7. EQUAL MC MOT IN CANTRACT iV WEST f - FAX: (503) 223 -2701 - -"i fi . :i 1E e!R r U EL9 pN LA8 TO THE EQU�. EQUWdFNT N(5 MOT TO SCALE iv Wmt I' - ..�. � _ ['''-' t - �fi0N4 E.W. EACH WAY WW !OoF , Y ; 20 5 72nd Av EXIS1: F]osT" W CONTACT RON COOK . � � , .� r r ; _ �• " .1 �.,, i ' x „ ,� a �. f f, : &A r; 't , ?QNIN A AR OF P L ' PARCEL NUMQER S OR'97223 Ef OCoc ON ; ! F�(TE / a IaE D �pc�� : : IL° ntt - FINI OPG. OPET� NO 4 - %� r • '' .•� t { , _ - - . . - ., .. ��N� OPP OPPOSITE If > rra � , , x : q F UOR FLUOR & AND i Y T 7,�7 11 G 2 { f �. � _ - C z ��/I r • _ , 3 ' Cam' .5 b � . :, 4 '1' fi ,t • " "lit r-':'-'. i 5 FOOT It CF'1 INE r . ; . � � �! E 3 • PLYWO PLYWOOD ' OWNER • u rn — : K.., ( X , ., . y_IW „ . • ..�s.. i ► EGTIIC T ILiTY: Pi4J PROJECT E , : - `3fi ' r t r x, , Y GALVANI D) 0 A s ,� ^ . - �. a l 5 7 CONSTRUCTION PROP FPExrr .�� ` 03 2 3--16 r.: COTOR - .: �' C J $ ., i - � r » t ic v F ,!•tt i . . 3 -..-- a .. > 4.�' '00,11 COT 4 00 T PRESSURE TRATED g NBER - >+1 v Z „ . , ' ` • . -. ): >' ; �r A: t t` = T! EPHO UT`IL1TY: GTE OPERATIONS t 1 r 4 _ �, , _ . -- � T ITL E SHEE 1 , ► R , - � TEL: 840)523 -3Q U , \' ' ( REVISION 100 ROOK! NUM = , aa '� L REAL ESTATE _.. 13ER s C a:, :.;..' c: 3 t-<i:. r ; �_.,t • - i• # a .. } , ;�! E1R L) EPAiTMEN Y: TIGARD FIR A 6AINISTTIQN V � � = ,� �-� �, �.�::• � � O ERAl�L. SITE. P t.� AN , F'� �!' RF ENGINEER . 1 KEY NO TE �� . � w _` 1 frL. S0 649 _ g 77 Dkrt 21 KEY NQTE f c �;3' ,r .� E� �> � GENERAL ERAL �/� . .# >, at A. ZONI E INFO FQ Ir .,. 4r EN ERA I F _ DETAIL tl --� LANDLOR D Et L R (�' EF EREN CE - TI R r. e SECTION ER •��;• C REFERENCE .� E sc _ . ' - t , a x t- I •s 2 _ F PARKING ! it Y � ), 1 REQUIREMENTS R MENTS AR UNCH 1„ It _ E ANGEQ cr .. a `+�''` SHEET N �. i ,_ °u , UMSF.Tt w ,,' , >. _ 2.: ' T RAF NA F iCTED a 1-- 1Y -, .fit REFERENCE FP, �., .Y 1 . .:. . - O \SG � P , • s. NC I\ S PROPOSED _ air .� , Q Y 1v s r {' 3 _ �' © y. A SOUR' ! - t9g , ABBREVIATIONS. NTH, p C ONS 8c T SYMBOLS ANT - T o u�. B LS T' TEAM � , EA _ . _ , yIQIP4I y v . - pAG .. r, G l2 i k�G� � PR� C'T SUMMARY - - �� PPS n z a .. 1. • •' K i • •. . ter s -a t - s n ♦ ..- .. _ -'• ^. , • , - - - - - -- ---- - - - -- - _ .-... - _ = _.._ _ __ �_ _ __- _ �� _ - . . A -P - -P- POWER LINE I TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY . . , '� , i ' ''' pos corp .. . . • . . OF •. THE E S E 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 1, T. 2 S. R.1 VII. , W.M. M AP - -_ � ___-_ _-- - - - - - - _- _____ _�_____________ / TO BEAVERTON r WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 7 35 NE AMBASSADOR PL., SUITE k3 P ORTLAND, OREGON 972 0 PHONE ' (503) 284 -2255 ' Ark . . N.r.s. FAX , - (503) 284 -0402 • LEGEND: �� �, SCALE: 1"40' • TRUE ® FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED FD. FOUND �, G 0 ° H y a a LEGAL DESCRIPTION -- PARENT PARCEL _ - -r '- Y ° -- 5 N , s ; # a. -- PROPERTY LINE I.R. IRON ROD 170 PARCEL I: 0 10 20 40 0' 22' 06 "- 4MN O N i NI3O E$s or AL -x-----x- .FENCE . I.P. IKON PIPE 4' q SURVEYOR , • ' FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, / . ' RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF .WASHINGTON PARCEL III: - -- EDGE OF PAVEMENT CATCH BASIN 18 21 SW VARNS ST INN - ,p if /, .. L. . AND STATE OF OREGON, RUN NORTH 89' 52' EAST ALONG THE SOUTH EDGE OF GRAVEL Q- POWER POLE ?f ~ antaaot4 LINE THEREOF 1475.70 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING FOR THIS A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 1, _ Sw SW VARNS S .? f "'�� MS DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST 40 FEET TO AN IRON ROD AT TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN IN THE Eil CHERRY EDGAR 1 473 .. COO K DR SW } THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ® UTILITY VALVE AS NOTED a a �- ► MORTGAGE TO THE BANK OF CALIFORNIA, DATED JUNE 2, 1964 AND AS FOLLOWS: SW RECORDED JUNE 9, 1964 IN MORTGAGE BOOK 503, PAGE 452; THENCE -G ---G GAS LINE UTILITY METER AS NOTED N SANORUR ' NORTH 0' 08' WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT SO BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, LOCATED EASEMENT LINE SITE — ST ( ) (RECORD INFORMATION S MORTGAGED AND SAID LINE EXTENDED NORTHERLY 330 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 52' EAST 2175.70 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER , TECH ENTEI < ; . K.. a y � " " . - PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, NORTH 89' 52' OF SAID SECTION 1, THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST 370.00 FEET TO THE FIRE HYDRANT DR ---S . SEWER LINE .. . EAST 1076.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF OREGON STATE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT TO OE - DESCRIBED HEREIN; TO LAKE OSWEGO - HIGHWAY KNOWN AS DALDOCK FREEWAY; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 0' 08' WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO ----- ----- PROPOSED LEASE SITE -�-- - - DATE LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY 370 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89' 52' WEST A DISTANCE OF 703.00 FEET TO a ' 1, THENCE SOUTH 89' 52' WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0' 08` EAST A DISTANCE OF 23.00 FEET TO A VICINITY MAP p ' __ • ' ,, SECTION 1, DISTANCE OF 1076.28 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 52' EAST A DISTANCE OF 3,00 FEET TO A REVISIONS POINT; THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEET TO A - -- EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE STATE POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 52' EAST A DISTANCE OF 700.00 FEET TO • NOTES: APPROVED BY DATE: NO DATE ISSUE BY AND THROUGH ITS STA (E HIGHWAY COMMISSION BY THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ,-- - --- ' OF OREGON, - - RECORDER'S BOOK 558, PAGE 524. 1. CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE 1 FOOT. i 12/20/95 FOR DESIGN OWNER �- -� 2 1-25796 FOR DESIGN 2. ALL ELEVA(IONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN ARE �� -' PARCEL II: BASED UPON N.G.S. VERTICAL DATUM N.G.V.D. 29 CONSTRUCTION _ _ _ _ _ FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUfIi, LEGAL DESCRIPTION -- LEASE AREA ' . 1941 ADJUSTMENT. __ ___ -- - -- -� "�- � � • • OPERATIONS L4 ► RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON LEASE AREA 3. LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE ARE BASED ON NAD83, __ T ----- ---�----- - - �- - - AND STATE OF OREGON RUNNING NORTH 89' 52' EAST ALONG THE SOU TIT A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 1 TOWNSHIP 1991 ADJUSTMENT. REAL ESTATE _ -__ _�_ - Z�a . -� - --- - - - -- ` LINE THEREOF 1353.2 FEET TO A 1 INCH IRON PIPE LOCATED ON THE 2 SOU TH RANGE 1 WEST WILLAMETTE TIE MERIDIAN WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON. -_ -_ -�� _ -��- POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 • WITH SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN DEED 4, THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHOWN ON THIS MAP ZONING -__ THE EAST LINE OF S.W. 72ND AVENUE (COUNTY ROAD NO 245) AND THE RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 91016626, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, IS BASED ON 'A LESSEE PROPERTY REPORT PROVIDED -- �- --""- -� -^ �`�-' - A ' _ POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION; (HENCE NORTH 89 52 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BY WESTERN AMERICAN PROPERTY RESEARCH COMPANY. EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 122.5 THE LESSEE PROPERTY REPORT DOES NOT INCLUDE _ . _ RF ENGINEERING _ -^ _ -_ ___ __ -_- _ .' I. , t FEET TO SOU THWEST CORNER OF ABOVE PARCEL I; THENCE PARCEL 0' 08' BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 89' 52' 00" EAST 10.00 FEET AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION. . WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL I A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET; SOUTH 00' 08' 00" EAST 1.86 FEET FROM DIE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DEA IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES �- - -�" -_ -� ` -_� PARCEL HI SAID DOCUMEN ( NO 910166 ?_6 AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH THENCE SOUTH 89' 52' WEST 115 FEET TO AN IRON ROD, AND THENCE THAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1 > • _ CONTINUING SOUTH 89' 52' WEST ALONG A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL 00' 08' 00" EAST 15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 52' 00" EAST, INCLUDED IN A TITLE REPORT, - ___ -�� - �___. WITH AND 40 FEET FROM THE SOU TIi LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, TO THE PARALLEL_ WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL I, 35.00 FEET; THENCE . POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID S.W. 5. OWNER: ERWIN SCHIMMEL :` NORTH 00 08' 00" WEST 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 52 00' • t)t T 72ND AVENUE (COUNTY ROAD NO. 245); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE WEST 35.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.012 ACRES _ U111TUDE 4 25' • 11.398" =, UN ( ) DIE MORE OR LES EAST LINE OF SAID S.W. 72ND AVENUE (COUNTY ROAD NO. 245 TO 6. PARCEL NUMBER: R0460003 (N 0 08 00 W _ _ _ - ' PLACE OF BEGINNING. 5 LONGITUDE 122 44 r 44.598 $ - P.O.B• PARCEL III (S 89' 52' 00" W 703.00. DEED) ' " . ; . 5 89' 8 2 ' 00'',W 7 02. 83 - - i , 86 5 ss• 2 00 w FD. 5/8" L.R. ' ► . - -- - - _ —_ • _.- --____ • - _ ` . r ..+ a r r .r , r. r." • rw i r r ., w r •r Y w 205.02) _ {_ _� F D. 5/8 F.R. (N 0' OS' 00" W - , a - —)C- __ _ s oo " w F ., , p t rn .az:c xr'spx m+ _ - 1 r� 0` 0 0 ':" - I 23.00 i ` ' . � '� t 1 - I `; -- .. , . 18 CON C 1 REl E CULVERT------___ _ 15.00 N � � .�,. t • � - — ,» ,t ,' - S p•OS'00 "E N 89'32'00 "E \ :.,,;+ \_ . _ /� _ 15, 00 -35.00 � 1 y ' , / SS -S5 SS -5S SS SS SS ` (N 89' 52' 00" E TEST BORE 110L1101E ` 3.00) N , • N SEWER TRUNK LINE AGREEMENT (._,/ ( v� BETW'EE N CITY OF TIGARD, FARMERS N . INSURANCE AND GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP. s 1300K 723, PAGE, 191 1 vn R • , ! DAV� FVANS AND• ASSOCIATJ S, INC L * 7 ' • / / // / - -- _ ENGINEERS, SURYBYOR3, MANNERS; LkNDSCAP8 ARCHITBCI . T • 7` \. 2828 3.M. COR BI'sTT AYL.NUR PORTLAND, OR 97201 (503)223 -6663 z / o � e ..G YTxY `::Ar p" 1:'. $.,?: i:'R,J6.8 R .: E'':9 r:i✓' .:..W»"1:G `.: V. 4v^. . / M s ( /� to :) P I 1 ' ;'� I. _ �3 BU ILDING / S� / -� 1-6 / TE • 217 . b BUILDING - - - -- - } - ' • w N SIT NUMBER • ,- 4 vi k % o 1 • - - __ - ��/, 1316 -n ; . til ,...„ ...,._, CI 1 Q F SUEAOORESS . / s9 q 17 ',,,:.,: ` a 4020 sw 12N Av E n r / EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS 5.0' WATER LINE - ---- Q _ TIGARD, OREGON 01224 UNRECORDED EASEMENT CREATED BY EASEMENT • METZGER • ' AND UTILITIES PER BOOK, 520 FUELING : INSTRUMENT, SEPT. 9, 1964 5.0` WIDE- STATION _ W ATER DISTRICT Y PAGE, �G9- WATER L EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF rr BOOK 649, PAGE y . .. _ ME. TIGER WATER DISTRIC f. 620 - • -- / , ' - S 89' 52' 40" W 190.26) _ ►:, - CURB _i_____„3 r EIEEIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIMIIIIIII G TOP OGR APH IC SURVE FD. 2 - S8. S S -- SS GATE o t BRASS IZ " I f _� ' �' r LA G G G G ,�, [ t/� CDR. s 8 --`2(- — ,� _ .Xs- �. - _--X - _ - X�- ..� --_..- - ,, X X .. �.. � .. -.. —. .... �-- Xr, • --- - X -x -to E�_. �-- - t---7. X- - � -. :-x-_-.- - , : • SEC. t 4 X X I — • PP W ?_ DROPS _ F; =H SEC. � i2 '' - 37.21 ?� » _ w .... (OUTH LINE SECTION I) ....... �._. ,,.::. �.,.... -- ..* _ . .» ... AND 3 TRANSFORM R5 M _. �� �' y (S 89' 52' 40" ... W 124.81) P.O.B. PARCEL_ I �N .$9' S2`. 40 97 6.48 � ' ' ttt- -- 1313.40 -10 WIDE DISTRIBUTION LINE UTILITY EASEMENT ---,•- BOOK, X17 PAGE, 594 P.O.B. PARCEL II EASEMENT TO P.O. E. BOOK 528,• r _ , r . PAGE 607 SNEEt NUMBE • .• - s • „ - fr .- - - ” ' ' c A ,- „t. : . . .::: ,. -..-..::.:-?--; I _ . . _ — .- ri . '[ .....................r............... = - : . c * - . fc ' . - .- ., .v. z . • . • ?' • • . . . • - - -, _ : _ a = 3 `4 y . • : ' NOTE. WHERE NECESSARY DUE TO SOIL SITE ; , .y ,, western,-,i CONDITIONS" REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL' ..- ; "'?! ; MO R REPLACE iru 4 -8' OIL t -1/2" CRUSHED SFF S Pt AN . ROCK COMPACTED TO 909f! OR ENGINEERED ' FILL. REVIEW WITH PROJECT MANAGER PRIOR 7535 NE AME3ASSADOR PL.,. SUITT'13 . ;;; '-: '1 ' PORTLAND, -. OREGON 97220 MONOPOLE; sEE PHONE w 503 284 -2255 '''.,:.'t: • SITE PLAN FOR HEIGHT I FAX 503 284 -0402 2 . I , . ; _ f : PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY LINE - . 3' -0" PRE[ERREO ON ALL Std OF PAD, , 8 MIN. :., nsr. �x' •-- �.'Va'y�=-.rr+r^- � sw.ww� ►' I- "r }}, 12" 4' -0' 2' - 0" /241 - a ! 1 • CABLE $ROE : '° e HIGH CHAIN -LINK FENCE EQUIPMENT CABINET FOUNDATION: I I COAX TERM FRAME - EXTENQ MIN. 12 INTO UNDISTURBED .. \� - r son. MID BELOW FROST DEPTH .PER DETAILS . � " u" ELECTR>eAI lr co -- .F SITE WITH 4*, OF 5/8x1 4 . . EQUIPMENT SUPPORT BOARD • . CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK WITH N „ EQUIPMENT CABINETS . - • GRADE SITE _WITH CROWN FRO CENTER OF (INSTALLED BY OTHERS) FINES. • APPLY OVER 6RABE0, MATEd; SLOPE JO A11. EQGfS COMPACTED SITE SITE AS INO 91 TREAT GRADER SITE W IT ?f �APP OF SITE PERIMETER AT 2.5 ROVEO . , �,•` " °� <',� E IE12 0 FINISH L _ WEED BARR P T G VE CAPE 2 r L • ..� =�,� :rs:" _' •s� '� �a>ti , .>t � �"�'u - :�. s "'�•�'�'y'ti'e'r �.�+ s�u:�� . .iws+� _ _ �r, . ,�, I or 44 ♦ ` t:31" ri 16 " II--I •TI .�I + °t Lrrl .. 3a a 1 �1 1 ! 1 1 1 11 If. 1 1 fl �.� 1_� ".) N. . : y 1 ! i�'tl r 1 n. [ 1 i��' :" y , / ` � . r x° L' =� :L =. r' r s� i ` .i 1 1«.1. -L -!`� ` �' 1 �, ► ,`� j �. '�;�'� = ` F . . ,. -,,:i-ko' �, ♦ ♦ r .! u USE SELECTED FILL EXISTING UNDISTURBED SON. --- i.. _� ; ,�. �� ' �, �.. :k , , EX /i � / AND GRABS SITE WITH CROWN. AS y • t I INDICATED; COMPACT' TO 90% ' . .: • TOWER FOOTING EXCAVATE MIN NECESSARY TO PER MANUFACTURER OAT£: APRIL 3rd, 1994' i ._ M • 'S DWG . GRUB SITU• REMOVE SOD, ROOTS ;' f . • ' ' S AND ALL UNSUITABLE SOIL' FROM *; PROJECT AREA REVISIONS � NO. !RATE ISSUE * .' . . . . , : i' � 1 11/23/95 PRELIMINARY rt { S • TYPI SITE SECTION 3 1 2/04/95 17EVISjoNS 1 - . ., 12/06/95 ` REVISION$ 2 . - .-; SEC ANTENNAS • SECTORIE0 ANTENNAS K - SECTOR 'A' = 156 SECTOR` A = 18 15 t 12/14/95 CITY ,SU[3MIT /AL - - : .._ SECTOR 'B' = 135' SECTOR '8' = 135' ' NOTE ONE EDGE OF TOWER PLATFORM SECTOR 'C' = 255 SECTOR C 255 TO BE .ORIENTATED 15 TO TRUE NORTH. 1/5/94 PRELIMINARY CQ�ISTRUC110N - i: l t I �, I " (AZIMUTH, O' TRUE NORTH) A 4/3/96. 17wOSCAP£ REYESION - ti y < — : . (3) PROPOSED PANEL ANTENNAS; EACH SIDE OF ANTENNA PLATFORM - . r y ' (9) ANTENNAS TOTAL ) K ' . • PRO POSED FUTURE a PROPOSED F UTURE 1715 S W. UPPER BOONE F EgR Y• ,R0. : w i , MI CROWAVE D IS H ' s 4 MICROWAVE DISH EXISTING '' DURHAM, OREGON 972 . _ - • � s, PARKING (503} 284- 225 - ' ;' , AREA PROPERTY LINE - ` t EXISTING ,,... r DRAINAGE EXISTING FENCE 10' -0" 35' -0 " w ' 1 ' 1' O" 8' -6" 14' -0" 5 - 6" 6' - ' r 5 i ,4 t • _ ------- • ? 6 ' -0" • Cr 0 - _ ... -- ... �.�. -... _ � . �r n— r.. —. a —. .�•. Iowa. • — — .nr - • y• 9 •�. i Y 0 ,, II) . r cv ANTENNA PLATFORM AT - I ` '" ...... TOP 4F' MONOPOLE ill 0 0 SEE SHEET ca , ,:„,:,,., ti., ...., *".' 1 ,,,/ N./ ■./ ■/ *.1 03 - . . , , .. in . . . , . . ,— PROPOSED SECTORIZED ANTENNAS - - SECTOR 'A' = 15' >' a SECTOR '8' 135' ''. . ;.,, SECTOR 'C' = 255' — • ~ < - -9 N 0' � -, T . � .{fir w;, Q - M 3 N \ I 3 I • PROPOSED lELCO N (0 PROPOSED 100' MONOPOLE — SEE SHEET' N N - ; t C• • N ' r . •' } * . PO PROPOSED WA GUIDE BRIDGE ' SITE NUIrIBER ! A' / SEE SHEE / ' . N. ti f , ?t- PROPOSED 100' MONOPOLE A -2 (4) PROPOSED 30 "x30 "x52" ` N � N '1' s EQUIPMENTS MOUNTED, TO N � �1�,13•�e",D } : 8x4 CON PAD '\ r SEE SHEET' \ 17 ' / PROPOSED LEASE AREA 14,13 ',: IX A — 2 N. SITE ADDRESS • Y r e. PROPOSED CABLE BRIDGE . s; I--- (4) PROPOSED 30 " x30 "x52" PROPOSED 8T5 CABINETS PROPOSED tANSCAPE: BUFFER ; EQUIPMENTS MOUNTED TO ' "r'¢ 8 H(GFi ARBORVITAE AND 8ER8E(2RY � ;: w 8 -0" x 14' —O" .. - COTTON EASTER GROUND COVER 14020 SW 72ND AVENUE .-1: j CONCRETE PAD EQUIVALENT TO 15X OF LEASE AREA , ' - fi . r., PROPOSED 8 HIGH SIGHT OBS. PROPOSED 6' HIGH SIGHT OBSCURING C D t ORE GO 87224 ° ` U FENCE, TYPICAL ALL SIDES ` FENCE, TYPICAL ALL SIDES WITH ' = f PROPOSED 8' HIGH SIGHT 08S. 12' GATE Z FENCE TYPICAL ALL SEE SHEET 6 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TRENCH c* 3 SIDES - PAVED SERVICE VEHICLE AREA y p k': . . z U - \ , I1 _14'a7 ` ° f - ' - ENLARGED . SITS PLAN : Z i 9 f .t, �"i` ,� Y ri+ i} s�' ? ' S � �'4 * r♦' i Z ; t'• a ..`�1 . T'r�- ttt . . A : .`'r e :• F < ` sf ?� - f Y ST _.; it:r Y� s-- .f�si r , � ; �^ a a t t �.k E r ( lr « { _ `r x O • T {, �+y'` (\ /��j t • 1 ,..f $ } . .-..le. X r ♦ t r [ + ' � . R t �a • .. ,N - - S I 1 E S I ION 1 • ' J ,t r' • r t Q : , }' i •,. I f a = t r 9 al L ai' .....?..),...x..:,%...:4; � y e y f `rf a , v i i , : a. � � . ? `';. ' +:' + ' T ' ' . a ,, f ' -,,.;. ` . i E EVA TIONS a . , =a' T ' ; x ;� t �. � ' •. ;�r ,� t} PROPOSED LANDSCAPING : IS OROUGNT L, at I �k! ti t , ..z :i 3, • 'y 1 n:.t. s„.rs.•� a. r'•�..�a.cfl . E ij k 7 ...a rxu -+ss. ..cc Y I' . at.+c:.+t:i3.+.,,.+ Ya.t } .L3.x,� . ; <�. _.' CE 2). WESTERN. PCS. CORP. WILL PROVIDE - a A . LANDSCAPE ., MAINTNANCI: ,CONTRACT _ ,-- -- $ TO MAINTAIN AND - WATER PROPOSED SHEET NUMBER • W t-;-ti - LAN DSCAPING: • . .fit, (L' �.4 A ■ Q , .. - „'.....1.':.`;:°:.,' ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /a " =1' -a' 1 ELEVATION ScA�.E: 1 % e•�1' =Q" ` ' ENLARGE SITI PI:AN . • SCALE: 1/8 1 —0 4 . . C4 + / ' t y . r I \ ,w TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - . A p western • . , :\ A OF r ®r THE SE 1 SE 1/4 SEC. 1 T. ?_S. R.1 W. W.M. / / ' TO BEAVERTON 7535 NE AMBASSADOR / R PL., SUITE [3 WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON • -5 PORTLAND, OREGON 972.20 r,, PHONE (503) 284--2255 FAX . (503) 284-0402 t F N. T.S. ':` -414)16. ' i A. `�\ L EGEND: , - SCALE. 1 " =40' • i l� o N Q F:4 \ • • F OUND MONUMENT AS NOTED FD. FOUND CN S � QP•v'� N t ; LEGAL DESCRIPTION �T -� j- '" �``_ = ` �' -- • PROPERTY LINE I.R. IRON ROD AC x REGISTERED PARCEL I: 0 10 20 40 - x-. -x- FENCE I.P. IRON PIPE h' 's P ROFESSIONAL . LAND SURVEYOR s_. FROM 1 - FIE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, : CATCH BASIN >„ RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE � — - EDGE OF PAVEMENT ILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY CF WASHINGTON PARCEL III: SW VARNS sr .� R ` << AND STATE OF OREGON, RUN NORTH 8T 52' EAST ALONG THE SOUTH - - - EDGE jr GRAVEL o- POWER POLE p� ?Id, .a OREGON LINE THEREOF 1475.70 FEET TO THE P OF BEGINNING FOR THIS A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 1, S sw sw VARNS ARNS sr •• 1 071 • DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST 40 FEET TO AN IRON ROD AT TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE m CHERRY EDGAR R. COOK THE SOUTHEAST CORNER CF THAT TRACT DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN THE COUNTY OF WASHINGTON AND STATE OF OREGON, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED -P P- POWER LINE ® UTILITY VALVE AS NOTED a OR -G G- GAS LINE sw 1073 MORTGAGE TO THE BANK OF CALIFORNIA, DATED JUNE 2, 1964 AND UTILITY METER AS NOTED T' AS FOLLOWS: _ l SAs� '': x NOf3URG RECORDED JUNE 9, 1964 IN MORTGAGE BOCK 503, PAGE 452; THENCE () RECORD INFORMATION SITE ST � NORTH 0' 08' WEST ALONG THE EAS LINE OF SAID TRACT SO QEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, LOCATED >` EMENT LINE SW � x � ; b ,, 10.4% . • TECH CENTE MORTGAGED AND SAID LINE EXTENDED NORTHERLY 330 FEET; THENCE ITH NORTH 89' 52' EAST 2175.70 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER 1 " ° PARALLEL W THE SOU Di LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, NORTH 89' 52' OF SAID SECTION 1, THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST 370.00 FEET TO THE U FIRE HYDRANT 1 OR EAST 1076.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF OREGON STATE TRUE POINT . OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT TO BE DESCRIBED HEREIN; —SS SEWER LINE TO LAKE OSWEGO HIGHWAY KNOWN AS BALDOCK FREEWAY; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 0' 08' WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO ; <, PROPOSED LEASE SITE l DATE , LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY 370 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89' 52' WEST A DISTANCE OF 703.00 FEET TO 1, THENCE SOUTH 89' 52' WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0' 08' EAST A DISTANCE OF 23.00 FEET TO A ,, . VICINITY MAP — SECTION 1, DISTANCE OF 1076.28 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 52' EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.00. FEET TO ' A :. REVISIONS POINT; THENCE NORTH 0' 08' WEST A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEET TO . A -- ' .-- i . EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE STATE POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' S2 EAST A DISTANCE CF 700.00 FEET To APPROVED BY: DATE: ` NO. DATE ISSUE - - - OF OREGON, BY AND THROUGH ITS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION BY THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. STATEMENT: 12/20/95 FOR DESIGN RECORDER'S BOCK 558, PAGE 524. OWNER _ f _ _ _ THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHOWN ON THIS MAP T- L T n - . ` - PARCEL II: LEASE AREA IS BASED ON A LE PROPERTY REPORT PROVIDED CONSTRUCTION " ,.r s' ) jq--% L3, A TRACT OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 1 TOWNSHIP BY WESTERN AMERICAN PROPERTY RESEARCH COMPANY. . P FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, 2 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN', WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON. - THE LESSEE PROPERTY REPORT DOES NOT INCLUDE OPERATIONS , ` _. =' _ RANGE 1 'NEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY CF WASHINGTON SAID TRACT BEING, A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED AS PARCEL I IN DEED SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION. AND STATE OF OREGON RUNNING NORTH 89' 52' EAS ALONG THE SOUTH RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 91016626, WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED RECORDS, - DEA IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES 'ZEAL ESTATE LINE THEREOF 1353.2 FEET TO A 1 INCH IRON PIPE LOCATED ON THE AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • THAT MAY ARISE FROM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ' POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 WITH INCLUDED IN A TITLE REPORT. ZONING I - - THE EAST LINE OF S.W. 72ND AVENUE (COUNTY ROAD ,NO. 245) AND THE BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS NORTH 89' 52' 00" EAST 10.00 FEET AND - - -- - POINT CF BEGINNING FCR THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 89' 52' SOUTH 00' 08' 00" EAST 1.86 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RF ENGINEERING EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, A DISTANCE OF 122.5 PARCEL III SAID DOCUMENT NO. 91016626; AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH -- — - FEET TO SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ABOVE PARCEL I; THENCE NORTH 0' 08' ' 00' 08' 00" EAST 15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 52' 00" EAST, NOTE: ___ _ __ _ _ WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL I A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET; PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL I, 35.00 FEET; THENCE THENCE SOUTH 89' 52' WEST 115 FEET TO AN IRON ROD, AND THENCE NORTH 00' 08' 00" WEST 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOU TH 89' 52' 00" 1. CON TOUR INTERVALS ARE 1 FOOT. CONTINUING SOUTH 89' 52' WEST ALONG A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WEST 35.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.012 ACRES - -- .., 2. ALL ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN ARE i WITH AND 40 FEET FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, TO THE MORE OR LESS. BASE' UPON N.G.S. VERTICAL DATUM N.0 V.D. 29 POINT CF INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID S,S.W. 4 1,947 ADJUSTMENT. • 72ND AVENUE (COUNTY ROAD NO. 245); THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE (N 0' 08' 00" W . EAST LINE OF SAID S.W. 72ND AVENUE (COUNTY ROAD NO. 245) TO THE 3 . LATITUDE A ND LONGITUDE ARE BASED ON NAD83, 5.00) : PLACE OF • BEGINNING. 1991 ADJUSTMENT. P.O.B. PARCEL III . (S 89' 52 oo" W 703 00 DEED) • 52 00 FD. 5/8" ► R SS 89' 52' 00" W 702.831 ....._ _ _ _ - - 35.00 y ( 0 _ ,0 ........ _ .r -- 2 1C '•'- -- - _ . - . . . - -- -- - -- - - -- - -- ------- ...,..._.. : _ - - - ._...- 00 5 I.R. v T oo N 89' S2' O E 205 S. - _ 4 _.. _ ."d 5...#.t ,�...2w...`.ev..3t. ..t,.. ,.rft.. ».,,.,.d..x .. �t.., xY ._.3i..".'..'..2.,.ax,l9.'....n d3.k,<»...3'a'a� • (N 0 oa oo W , t - : , L. r . ; = £`fi�fitCRE]E _. __: " _ - — - T5 04 - -� u, f 23.00 . ..,: : .. � U.L. ... _ _ _ _ ____ � —. n , S 08',4.,07: �S .00" _- _ 35 0 0 5 2, 00„ E • SS s ss . ss SS ss x (N 89' 52' 00" E / TEST BORE H9L-E" 3.00) • • - N , ././ • S EWER TRUNK LINE AGREEMENT ��� • ■ 1 f CD L LTOU • v) BETWEEN CITY OF TIGARD, FARMERS > �� 4 INSURANCE AND GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP. k Y -_, , t , ' BOOK 723, PAGE, 191 p -- • --� / '< D AVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. I . . • Tw; -� • _ - --1 " ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS, LANDSCAPE ARCH . , x+ . + , , "J �, P 2828 S.N. CORSET' AVENUE PORTLAND, OR 97201 (503)223 fi683 / 1 f O ,'P',,,'.,,:,,,,'':.;,. ,F . • f-' n, t �._ (N / , ^ .� fa L� x a4s.aa x. . ,,�•'. :;o...t:.t -z C;; ,* / . - IVY, ` • �' t Q i M - k i SITE NAME . - t Q • - • � ` 't I Id i ' : ' - I BUILDING F--- j' ' I Z o � 1 -- T E 217 • -' l PCRCH B UI L DING / w t , • N r SITE NUMBER J I / I Q, (/) N. 1316- D • 2 SITE E BAS In ED S / / A / . A / _ N _ - -17 3 - - -- • % �— 0 14020 SW 72ND AVE- r " EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, U.AESS . . , . ' / '�'` 5.0 WA / ER LINE �-- - / Q TIGARD, OREGON 97224 AND UTILITIES PER BOCK, 520 UNRECORDED E:ASEMENT CREATED BY FUELING • � F f EASEMENT METZG T� / . t . INSTRUMENT, SIEPT. 9, 1964 3.0'. WIDE - STATION � ' � WATE' DISTRICT i / PAGE, 309 N W LINE EASEMENT IN FAVOR CF - __ / BOO' / 649, PAGE ` ; ;�� Ti \ METZGER WATER UISTRiC C, J 620 5 88' 52' 40" W - • , CURB C �- ____ S HEET TITLE , 190.26 • ��_ Ss — ss — - 1 FD. 2" 6, BRASS 8 . ` 1 I, . , ,.. .. GATE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY G G G — -� - ® ( � / //_ - _ . i CAP �S 1 8 i \ — �( )( � � Ali _ r �— a _�( i .�( . _ -- �� -_ - . \ 1 COR. 1 . ,j (____- ` i,/ X >>, __X .�-- — " '� _ PP W/2 DROPS I SEC_ 1 • ._ P.C.B. PARCEL I. _ .... ...�........._. _..._. , SEC. 12 J 3 V i. - 2 i 'e - ' (S 89' 52' 40" W 124.81) -- — N 89' 52 40" E 976.) ---- -- _ -- 46 3a AND TRANSFORMERS . t . 1313.40 \ - (SOUTIl LINE SECTION I) . . - 10 NI Q I J RIBUI7 0 N G I JE UTILITY EASEMENT > .. . E AST MEN T "TO P.G.E. BOOK 526, BOOK, 517 PAGE, 594 . P.O.B. PARCEL II PAGE" 607 • w SHEET NUMBER .. . A \ ' . I \ ' ' . LA , , - - ■ '� � ' .. SCALE: 1" = 401 - - c !•}