Loading...
CUP1995-00006 • • CITY OF TIGARD OREGON CIITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER <=> BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Concerning Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95 -0006 Name of Owner: Tigard - Tualatin School District Name of Applicant: Same Address of Applicant: 13137 SW Pacific Highway City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Address of Property: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 2S1 13BA, tax lot 400 and 2S1 13B, tax lot 300 Request ➢ A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.54, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Zone: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. Schools and related uses are also permitted subject to conditional use permit approval. Action ➢ ❑ Approval as requested © Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance © Affected governmental agencies ® The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator ®The applicant and owner(s) THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON NOVEMBER 15, 1995 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED Final Decision The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 15, 1995 Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 95 -0006 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER • • • • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application for a conditional use ) FINAL ORDER permit to enlarge the Durham Elementary School ) in the R -12 zone at 8048 SW Shaffer Lane ) CUP 95 -0006 in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Durham Elementary School) I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to add 39,135 square feet to an existing 23,830 square foot building at the Durham Elementary School, replacing two modular classrooms that were approved in 1990 and adding nine new parking spaces. The additional space is being provided north and south of the existing school building. The additional parking spaces are situated along the west edge of the existing parking and maneuvering area. The applicant will remove about 22 existing trees over six inches in diameter to accommodate the new structures and parking. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE, SURROUNDINGS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Section II of the City of Tigard Staff Report, and the NPO and agency comments in Sections IV and V of the City of Tigard Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The hearings officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Report. IV. PUBLIC RECORD Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer ") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on October 23, 1995. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. The following testimony was offered at the hearing: 1. City planner Mark Roberts testified for the City. He summarized the staff report and recommendation. He further recommended deleting condition of approval 1, because a 4 -foot wide sidewalk already exists along Durham Road. He also testified that monies have been budgeted from the city's capital facilities fund to partially pay for a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road. He testified that the school expansion does not cause signal warrants to be exceeded, therefore staff did not recommend a condition requiring the applicant to contribute toward funding for that signal. Nevertheless the school board is meeting to consider making such a contribution in the interest of enhancing pedestrian safety and responding to community concerns. 2. Ron Hudson appeared for the applicant. He accepted the staff report and recommendation as amended at the hearing. 3. Sally Christensen testified in writing about the need for a traffic signal and crosswalk at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road, and recommending the use of traffic impact fees for this purpose. She attached a traffic study to her letter. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 95 -0006 (Durham Elementary School) Page 1 • • • • V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The hearings Officer incorporates by reference the responsive findings about compliance with the Community Development Code and Comprehensive Plan in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Report. VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The hearings officer visited the site and surrounding area. VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of effect agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 95 -0006, subject to conditions of approval 2.a through 2.d in Section VI of the City of Tigard Staff Report. • ATE ,„t this 31st day of October, 1995. 41014■ / I %7 .l // Larry Ep -in AI fAr ' City of igari H:i, ngs Officer Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 95 -0006 (Durham Elementary School) Page 2 • AGGI ITEM: 2.1 • BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by the STAFF REPORT Tigard/Tualatin School District CUP 95 -0006 for a 39,135 square foot addition to a newer existing building of the Durham Elementary School Site. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Conditional Use Permit CUP 95 -0006 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Conditional Use approval to allow construction of a 39,135 square foot addition to the Durham Elementary School to add classrooms and related school facilities. APPLICANT: Tigard/Tualatin School District OWNERS: same 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Public Institutional(Pub - Ins) ZONING DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential 12 units per acre (R -12) LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA, tax lot 400, 2S1 13B, tax lot 300). APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.82, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: > Approval subject to conditions Q HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 1 •• •• • L FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Background Information: On August 22, 1988, the City Council approved 1) a plan amendment from Light Industrial to Public Institutional for 2.89 acres of the adjacent Hambach property and the 20 -foot wide accessway of the PGE property (CPA 88 -03); and 2) a zone change from I -L (Light Industrial) for those portions of these two properties and also for the Durham School property from I -P (HD) (Industrial Park, Historic District Overlay) to R -12 (HD) (ZC 88- 08). On October 27, 1988, the Historic Sites and Districts Committee and the Hearings Officer reviewed a proposal to construct a new classroom building of 23,830 square feet on the southern portion of the site of the Durham Elementary School (CUP 88 -08, HD 88 -01). Access to the new classroom building was to be developed from SW 85th Avenue through the Unified Sewerage Agency's Durham Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. The proposed expanded school use of the site contained use of the two existing school buildings with no changes to those buildings or to the developed portion of the site. The proposal was approved subject to conditions of approval. The new classroom building was occupied in September 1989. In January, 1990 the Hearings Officer approved Conditional Use Permit 89 -06 which allowed installation of two temporary modular classroom buildings at the Durham Elementary School. These modular classrooms were proposed to be used until June 1992. B. Site size and shape: The gross property acreage is 8.48 acres and rectangular in shape with dimension of 274 feet along SW Durham Road and 873 feet of depth. An additional rectangular area developed as a playground adjoins a portion of the school site to the east. This playground measures 243 feet along SW Durham Road and has a depth of 519 feet. C. Existing uses and structures: The majority of the site is developed with the existing elementary school and related playground uses. The site is relatively level and contains no existing vegetation. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 2 • • 7. Section 18.114 (Signage) states that one freestanding sign up to 32 square feet per • face may be permitted in the Commercial- Professional zone. Wall signs are limited • to five (5) percent of the size of the wall which the sign is to be mounted on. No signs have been proposed as a part of this application. Sign permits must be obtained prior to the installation of any sign on the premises. 8. Section 18.116 (Waste and Recycling Enclosures) provides a range of methods of compliance with trash and recycling enclosure design requirements. The applicant has provided a trash enclosure which appears to meet the minimum size standards set forth within this section. Due to potential ongoing problems with site servicing it is recommended that the applicant obtain approval from the site's franchised hauler for the proposed enclosure location. The enclosure shall also be provided with a six foot tall solid screen around the enclosure. 9. Section 18.130.040 (Conditional Use Permits) contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1) The site size and dimensions provide: a. Adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatment to mitigate possible adverse effects from the use on surrounding properties and uses. 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5) The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 Site Development Review are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Criteria 1 and 2 are addressed because this school site is established facility the addition intends to expand the use of the facility from 400 to 600 students. In terms of the architectural design and site use issues the addition has been designed to be complementary with the existing school facility. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 5 •• •• Criteria 3 has been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Public facilities are available or • can be made available to serve this addition. Criteria 4 has been addressed through this Conditional Use Permit application. Section 18.130.150 (C)(9) provides development standards for schools uses. A school use partially supersedes the development standards of the underlying R -12 Zoning Designation. This section identifies no minimum lot size standard for school uses. The proposed addition maintains a 30 foot front yard setback requirement. The rear yard setback maintains a 20 foot setback. This addition most closely . adjoins a sideyard setback area. The addition appears to meet the 20 foot setback requirement, however the applicant shall demonstrate that the addition will meet this standard. Criteria 5 refers to the criteria contained within Section 18.114 (Signage) and 18.120 (Site Development Review) and are addressed elsewhere within this report. or are deemed to be inapplicable because this addition is not a multiple family residential development. Criteria 6 has been addressed because the Comprehensive Plan presently designates this site for a Public Institutional use. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.020(E) requires a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground level. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Section 18.150.030(A): 1. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; 2. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; 3. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; 4. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; 5. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and 6. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. Section 18.150 requires that the number of trees over six inches in diameter that will be removed during construction be minimized. The proposed construction of streets, utilities, and residences as well as related grading will require the removal of trees. A detailed tree survey plan was submitted as part of this application. Based on a reconnaissance of the site HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 6 � • Alk the building addition man will require removal of seven trees Wevelop the site given P g the site constraints. Criteria 1 and 2 are addressed because requiring all of the trees to be left in place would limit the size and extent of parking and building additions which could be developed on this site. Adding onto the existing school facility allows for the development of a more efficient and compact school facility. Criteria 3 is addressed because has a slope of approximately one percent. The trees which are proposed to be removed are not needed for soil erosion control because they do not provide soil stability on a sloping portions of the site. Criteria 4 has been addressed because the trees which are proposed to be removed and consist of two small groups which are not a part of forested area. Criteria 5 has been addressed the aesthetic character of the larger area is not visually impacted because the site is not visually prominent due to the topography of the area. Criteria 6 has been addressed because of the site constraints such as the types of improvements which are existing classrooms, parking lots and playground areas and the remaining areas left to be developed provide no other alternatives which would allow parking and building additions to take place without acquiring additional property or remodeling other existing site improvements. It does not appear to be feasible to plant replacement trees on this site given the location and type of other property improvements which are developed. The largest potential area is the athletic field which must be kept clear for athletic uses. 9. Section 18.164 (Streets and Utilities) contains development standards for streets and utilities. a. Section 18.164.030(A) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E) requires a Minor Collector street to have a minimum 60 feet of right -of -way, a 40 feet minimum roadway width, and 2 -3 moving lanes. c. Section 18.164.070(A) requires sidewalks adjoining both sides of a major collector streets. d. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. e. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 7 The Engineering DearSnt has reviewed the street and public •ty needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin or access a public street no conditions of • approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. The applicant has also not proposed to extend utility services to the site. N. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS FINDINGS: 1. TRAFFIC: The applicant has submitted a traffic report entitled "Transportation Analysis for Durham School Expansion ", dated August 30, 1995, as prepared by Associated Transportation Engineering & Planning (ATEP). The report includes traffic counts along SW Durham Road at the intersections of SW Hall Boulevard and SW 79th Avenue, together with estimates of the projected traffic generated by the school with the completed expansion. The report concludes that the increase of school traffic to 1995 traffic will not unduly affect either intersection. The report does not include traffic projections beyond 1995. In addition, the report indicates that traffic warrants to justify a traffic signal at SW Durham Road and SW 79th Avenue are not satisfied. This proposed signal has been the subject of local community discussion and has been recommended by the South Citizens Involvement Team (CIT). In particular, with the proposed construction of SW Durham Road as a part of the Washington County MSTIP program, it was the desire of the both the School District and the local community to include the traffic signal with the work scheduled for 1996. Although the traffic report does not make any recommendations for pedestrian improvements, it is the recommendation of the Engineering Department that the site plan be revised to include a six foot wide sidewalk across the school site from the proposed new building addition to the new sidewalk to be constructed in SW Durham Road. 2. STREETS: The site currently takes access from SW Shaffer Street, a local street located on the contiguous Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) property which connects to the southerly extension of SW Hall Boulevard known as SW 85th Avenue. The existing street has been improved and no changes are proposed. The new site plan shows the construction of the building addition only, utilizing the existing on -site parking lot improvements and the existing single driveway onto SW Shaffer Street. 3. SEWER: The existing school building is presently connected to the public sewer located on USA property and no changes are proposed. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 8 4. STORM DRAIN: • • • The site currently drains toward the contiguous USA property and an existing underground . • storm drain system upstream of the nearby Fanno Creek. The site plan does not propose any changes to the existing parking lot. However, the impervious area will be increased by the additional building coverage and the roof drainage should be directed to the existing underground storm drain system. In addition, the project should incorporate an on -site water quality facility as prescribed by the requirements of the Unified Sewerage Agency. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. The applicant should re- design the site plan to include a water quality facility that would be maintained by the School District. V. CIT & AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The South Citizen Involvement Team was notified of the proposed Conditional Use Permit. No comments or objections to this development were received. In addition, applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting regarding this request. 2. No other comments were received by the Planning Division. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division concludes that the Conditional Use request for this existing site will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of Conditional Use Permit proposal CUP 95 -0006 subject to the conditions which follow. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall re- design the site plan to include a six foot wide sidewalk from the new building addition, adjacent to the existing parking lot, to connect the existing walk to the proposed sidewalk in SW Durham Road. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall include an on -site water quality facility as a part of the final site plan and shall provide a drainage report for approval of the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 9 • 3. The applicant shall op revised site and landscaping planes o approval of the following: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. a. The applicant shall either provide information concerning the numbers of existing bicycle facilities or revise the site plan to add a minimum of 54 bicycle parking spaces b. The site plan is required to be revised to provide a minimum of one additional handicapped accessible parking space. c. The applicant shall apply for and receive approval from the City's Historic Sites and Districts Committee conduct a Public Hearing and determine that this addition is not detrimental to this historic resource. d. The applicant shall obtain approval from the site's franchised hauler for the proposed location. The enclosure shall also be provided with a six foot tall solid screen around the enclosure. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. /C,../AeCZ Prepared By: Mark Roberts Date Associate Planner Approved By: Dick Bewersdorff Date Senior Planner HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 10 • I I • I ' ‘ V • - ?.. tt ttEl=i ttli t:15/4/Alfil• I , - . scirT7nrula ....KwA.q 1-A R. wil1 •II: 2/ : I; E. _ 1 . 1 :Mica 1:1°- I i 1.1 Egli 'MI fil Ita. Igtio• .. 6 1 ` ‘ r nal NEI 11 .,1 sp_s 4 I Vi m Eltill: b ib. - - mil iiir... ' . , ,',. :•::: -:•.14401 4 4 '' . • • • lir-- --.f..„ it -_iiimi ,...,,,....., ., :::..-._,,,,-:::,.. i 111 NE — 11 _ .,, , cp ati on f 1111 MEM 1 . : . ' -‘:. Eli I : iiiii .., fillanaitt. ; i si : ,;_ IN _ • 0 i • - ; L \\ I ....._,_, 7.177 ■ 1 a : m ... CP i 40 ' -.-' ' - INN , F-12 . -:.'' , • :__. - . - -7 , • - ?:::, - ;:t- . ., 71 :- I ,, CL -..---- c I b k nu i,: ' i LI , r -,-, i 33.1 2—./". lluist .. 1 - 411 a _ 6- ; 1 ' ' R-12 mwgt% m :I F ' :,.-.-:.?.........-- i .. .. _ i m -- - ui -4- C-Z t a i l IWG .-- EiTTF% ME I M i _•• : ':: .: . 1 %.. - - .. --- ■ 1 1111co 1:€1111111 \jyfi 1 ..... I P I To :•: .-...j. ! (.../ -2--......_ • . ' U , ; ,,,,,,,, , /......A =Hon T IIIIP 2 A --0 . <I ,' pi I g o 1piu111111 rp - 1 1, 4 7, e , = . . ‘ . ik• 4,1ouns: 0 Mgt= Ere &Algid .. , .., . .. . 1 ...." 64 a' ArInfirm ..A, -k RA , ItigE.2 I. • 4111 .: . u s, , _' tit mil _ .!111111110 i / ,4_4 1 Z 154 • *Av.= Elm 1 . 1 r3 ti■ . _ . , . I-- I r. sulutkili . ' r " -r / / • 4 I — lin •-' Mb& r C,,A7 lin -0 ' 1 , TIGARD - - • 4 4 DIS TRIC T .•1 ,. -..,.. ,..„; Ca. HIGH SCHOOL ' I 1 • j \ SITE -->>>> I! li, T AR Y GSCH / I I CD TREATMENT d , e.,7,-' , •: A CC I. PLANT I [ 1 - ,- -„..... . . ., — P I I i i I - d 1 I ( d - 0 A I- ,OZZ/zif. /03.4'3 ,/ 1----- // 'i;•; 41/ - ---- :. 3. / I LL _.-..:-._ ..59:21111P 0 1 I '12-i---: ----/-, , .. ..__,-. . ,...._... i 1 -- -•I.' - . . Al DUR,E-rp.kTuilliAINE rD >. , /„,/,_:_„:,,:-:„.„- ..,"„,,,„,,„ , , , \ , 0 VICINITY 11 CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP il CUP 95-0006 - MIS 95-0018 - I I _ DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION . 1 , °III Q-111 . , . , ■ ' or DURHAM ROAD 401..... losiiiriok 4 .1 tpleige(61F *41 4.14041**a .1.val 0 Il i 1 O as t 1 � t g " W • • O - ----� '/ ` D F frV I 7:,, V it � a - 1 4 I HI z 1 o i !..0:s:•1:; ) 0. 1 g 1 , \ " J 1 -.\\.,: , - ' r,__ _ 7. _ 7 1 re. 0 / „.,.., ,,,,,-..., 1 ft, 1 1 Qi z 1 1 it , . b Is 6 11 ni 1 CC g ;; , • .'" .,......• 7 , § II 4 i ° i LL i 0 i § IL , 0 11 1 s iii ;< Ili 11 . O 4 liik. • 41E) >- .. .. — f li t— P4112011A1.4.U.t E PLOT PLAN CASE NO. EXHIBIT MAP MIS 95-0018 • DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSICi • 0 N �� `. City of Tigard, Oregon AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) ' County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn /affirm, on oath depose and say: that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon. ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) PUBLIC HEARING FOR: (knack boa above, B applicable) (check appropriate box below} (Enter Public Hearing Date above) ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council • ❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑) DECISION FOR: {Check box above, If applicabb} City of Tigard Planning Director I That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED ❑ FINAL ORDER FOR: {check box above, it applicable} {check appropriate box below} ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ 7 Tigard Planning Commission �/ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard City Council ❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR: A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION /NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S) of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A ", was ma ed to each n ed perso (s) at the address(s )shown on the opt fie li (s), marked Exhibit "B'� on e A- d I�G� �" 199 , and deposited . in the Unite- States Mail on the _ j f d. 199 stage prepaid. r 4/. . ). _. _ ! ��i 41 i a ,trd Notice 1 ?zpzia__,_Subscribed and sworn /affirmed before me on the / day of , 197.3 • -OFFICIAL SEAL e ff II DIANE M JELDERKS �/ i/t : 14 /f `C� NWARY PUBLIC•OREGON COMMISSION NO. 046142 NOTARY PUBLIC • REGO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07. 1999 My Commission e Tres: 9 7 7FILE INFO.:G'i NAME(S): i n ^Pin -b2,1 { /Yc4 S v e- v L; --1-7 9 °41 CASE NO.(S): (L 'I6 to TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON CIITY OF TIGARD Washington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER ra BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER Concerning Case Number(s): CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95 -0006 Name of Owner: Tigard- Tualatin School District Name of Applicant: Same Address of Applicant: 13137 SW Pacific Highway City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97223 Address of Property: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane City: Tigard State: Oregon Zip: 97224 Tax Map and Lot No(s).: 2S1 13BA, tax lot 400 and 2S1 13B, tax lot 300 Request > A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.54, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Zone: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. Schools and related uses are also permitted subject to conditional use permit approval. Action > ❑ Approval as requested © Approval with conditions ❑ Denial Notice: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: © Owners of record within the required distance ® Affected governmental agencies El The affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator ©The applicant and owner(s) THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON NOVEMBER 15,1995UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED Final Decision The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Department, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. Appeal: Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with 18.32.290 (B) and Section 18.32.370, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within ten (10) days after notice is given and sent. The appeal may be submitted on City forms and must be accompanied by the appeal fee(s) of $315.00 plus transcript costs, not in excess of $500.00. THE DEADLINE FOR FILING OF AN APPEAL IS 3:30 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 15,1995 . Questions: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Department at (503) 639 -4171. CUP 95 -0006 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER 41 111 41 110 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application for a conditional use ) FINAL ORDER permit to enlarge the Durham Elementary School ) in the R -12 zone at 8048 SW Shaffer Lane ) CUP 95 -0006 in the City of Tigard, Oregon ) (Durham Elementary School) I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to add 39,135 square feet to an existing 23,830 square foot building at the Durham Elementary School, replacing two modular classrooms that were approved in 1990 and adding nine new parking spaces. The additional space is being provided north and south of the existing school building. The additional parking spaces are situated along the west edge of the existing parking and maneuvering area. The applicant will remove about 22 existing trees over six inches in diameter to accommodate the new structures and parking. II. FINDINGS ABOUT SITE, SURROUNDINGS AND PUBLIC FACILITIES The hearings officer incorporates by reference the findings about the site and surroundings in Section II of the City of Tigard Staff Report, and the NPO and agency comments in Sections IV and V of the City of Tigard Staff Report. III. APPLICABLE APPROVAL STANDARDS The hearings officer incorporates by reference the approval standards in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Report. IV. PUBLIC RECORD Tigard Hearings Officer Larry Epstein (the "hearings officer ") received testimony at the public hearing about this application on October 23, 1995. A record of that testimony is included herein as Exhibit A (Parties of Record), Exhibit B (Taped Proceedings), and Exhibit C (Written Testimony). These exhibits are filed at the Tigard City Hall. The following testimony was offered at the hearing: 1. City planner Mark Roberts testified for the City. He summarized the staff report and recommendation. He further recommended deleting condition of approval 1, because a 4 -foot wide sidewalk already exists along Durham Road. He also testified that monies have been budgeted from the city's capital facilities fund to partially pay for a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road. He testified that the school expansion does not cause signal warrants to be exceeded, therefore staff did not recommend a condition requiring the applicant to contribute toward funding for that signal. Nevertheless the school board is meeting to consider making such a contribution in the interest of enhancing pedestrian safety and responding to community concerns. 2. Ron Hudson appeared for the applicant. He accepted the staff report and recommendation as amended at the hearing. 3. Sally Christensen testified in writing about the need for a traffic signal and crosswalk at the intersection of 79th Avenue and Durham Road, and recommending the use of traffic impact fees for this purpose. She attached a traffic study to her letter. Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 95 -0006 (Durham Elementary School) Page 1 411 110 V. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The hearings Officer incorporates by reference the responsive findings about compliance with the Community Development Code and Comprehensive Plan in Section III of the City of Tigard Staff Report. VI. SITE VISIT BY HEARINGS OFFICER The hearings officer visited the site and surrounding area. VII. CONCLUSION AND DECISION 1. The hearings officer concludes that the proposed conditional use permit complies with the applicable criteria and standards of the Community Development Code, provided development that occurs after this decision complies with applicable local, state, and federal laws and with conditions of approval warranted to ensure such compliance occurs. 2. In recognition of the findings and conclusions contained herein, and incorporating the Staff Report and other reports of effect agencies and public testimony and exhibits received in this matter, the hearings officer hereby approves CUP 95 -0006, subject to conditions of approval 2.a through 2.d in Section VI of the City of Tigard Staff Report. P ATE ,t this 31st day of October, 1995. / ,, Larry Ep - in AI 97' City of igar, H; ngs Officer Hearings Officer Final Order CUP 95 -0006 (Durham Elementary School) Page 2 A�DA ITEM: 2.1 BEFORE THE LAND USE HEARINGS OFFICER FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON Regarding an application by the STAFF REPORT Tigard/Tualatin School District CUP 95 -0006 for a 39,135 square foot addition to a newer existing building of the Durham Elementary School Site. I. SUMMARY OF THE REQUEST CASE: Conditional Use Permit CUP 95 -0006 SUMMARY: The applicant requests Conditional Use approval to allow construction of a 39,135 square foot addition to the Durham Elementary School to add classrooms and related school facilities. APPLICANT: Tigard/Tualatin School District OWNERS: same 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Public Institutional(Pub - Ins) ZONING DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential 12 units per acre (R -12) LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S 1 13BA, tax lot 400, 2S 1 13B, tax lot 300). APPLICABLE LAW: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.82, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: > Approval subject to conditions < HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 1 411 10 411 110 L FINDINGS ABOUT SITE AND SURROUNDINGS A. Background Information: On August 22, 1988, the City Council approved 1) a plan amendment from Light Industrial to Public Institutional for 2.89 acres of the adjacent Hambach property and the 20 -foot wide accessway of the PGE property (CPA 88 -03); and 2) a zone change from I -L (Light Industrial) for those portions of these two properties and also for the Durham School property from I -P (HD) (Industrial Park, Historic District Overlay) to R -12 (HD) (ZC 88- 08). On October 27, 1988, the Historic Sites and Districts Committee and the Hearings Officer reviewed a proposal to construct a new classroom building of 23,830 square feet on the southern portion of the site of the Durham Elementary School (CUP 88 -08, HD 88 -01). Access to the new classroom building was to be developed from SW 85th Avenue through the Unified Sewerage Agency's Durham Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. The proposed expanded school use of the site contained use of the two existing school buildings with no changes to those buildings or to the developed portion of the site. The proposal was approved subject to conditions of approval. The new classroom building was occupied in September 1989. In January, 1990 the Hearings Officer approved Conditional Use Permit 89 -06 which allowed installation of two temporary modular classroom buildings at the Durham Elementary School. These modular classrooms were proposed to be used until June 1992. B. Site size and shape: The gross property acreage is 8.48 acres and rectangular in shape with dimension of 274 feet along SW Durham Road and 873 feet of depth. An additional rectangular area developed as a playground adjoins a portion of the school site to the east. This playground measures 243 feet along SW Durham Road and has a depth of 519 feet. C. Existing uses and structures: The majority of the site is developed with the existing elementary school and related playground uses. The site is relatively level and contains no existing vegetation. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM FT EMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 2 1 111 li b 7. Section 18.114 (Signage) states that one freestanding sign up to 32 square feet per face may be permitted in the Commercial- Professional zone. Wall signs are limited to five (5) percent of the size of the wall which the sign is to be mounted on. No signs have been proposed as a part of this application. Sign permits must be obtained prior to the installation of any sign on the premises. 8. Section 18.116 (Waste and Recycling Enclosures) provides a range of methods of compliance with trash and recycling enclosure design requirements. The applicant has provided a trash enclosure which appears to meet the minimum size standards set forth within this section. Due to potential ongoing problems with site servicing it is recommended that the applicant obtain approval from the site's franchised hauler for the proposed enclosure location. The enclosure shall also be provided with a six foot tall solid screen around the enclosure. 9. Section 18.130.040 (Conditional Use Permits) contains the following general approval criteria for a Conditional Use: 1) The site size and dimensions provide: a. Adequate area for the needs of the proposed use; and b. Adequate area for aesthetic design treatment to mitigate possible adverse effects from the use on surrounding properties and uses. 2) The characteristics of the site are suitable for the proposed use considering size, shape, location, topography, and natural features. 3) All required public facilities have adequate capacity to serve the proposal. 4) The applicable requirements of the zoning district are met except as modified by this chapter. 5) The supplementary requirements set forth in Chapter 18.114 (Signs) and Section 18.120.180 Site Development Review are met. 6) The use will comply with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Criteria 1 and 2 are addressed because this school site is established . facility the addition intends to expand the use of the facility from 400 to 600 students. In terms of the architectural design and site use issues the addition has been designed to be complementary with the existing school facility. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 5 11 11 Criteria 3 has been reviewed elsewhere within this report. Public facilities are available or can be made available to serve this addition. Criteria 4 has been addressed through this Conditional Use Permit application. Section 18.130.150 (C)(9) provides development standards for schools uses. A school use partially supersedes the development standards of the underlying R -12 Zoning Designation. This section identifies no minimum lot size standard for school uses. The proposed addition maintains a 30 foot front yard setback requirement. The rear yard setback maintains a 20 foot setback. This addition most closely adjoins a sideyard setback area. The addition appears to meet the 20 foot setback requirement, however the applicant shall demonstrate that the addition will meet this standard. Criteria 5 refers to the criteria contained within Section 18.114 (Signage) and 18.120 (Site Development Review) and are addressed elsewhere within this report. or are deemed to be inapplicable because this addition is not a multiple family residential development. Criteria 6 has been addressed because the Comprehensive Plan presently designates this site for a Public Institutional use. Tree Removal: Section 18.150.020(E) requires a permit for removal of trees having a trunk six inches or more in diameter measured four feet above the ground level. A permit for tree removal must comply with the following criteria as specified in Section 18.150.030(A): 1. The trees are diseased, present a danger to property, or interfere with utility service or traffic safety; 2. The trees have to be removed to construct proposed improvements or to otherwise utilize the applicant's property in a reasonable manner; 3. The trees are not needed to prevent erosion, instability, or drainage problems; 4. The trees are not needed to protect nearby trees as windbreaks or as a desirable balance between shade and open space; 5. The aesthetic character in the area will not be visually adversely affected by the tree removal; and 6. New vegetation planted by the applicant, if any, will replace the aesthetic value of trees to be cut. Section 18.150 requires that the number of trees over six inches in diameter that will be removed during construction be minimized. The proposed construction of streets, utilities, and residences as well as related grading will require the removal of trees. A detailed tree survey plan was submitted as part of this application. Based on a reconnaissance of the site HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 6 the building additi 6cation will require removal v g q of seven to develop the site given the site constraints. Criteria 1 and 2 are addressed because requiring all of the trees to be left in place would limit the size and extent of parking and building additions which could be developed on this • site. Adding onto the existing school facility allows for the development of a more efficient and compact school facility. Criteria 3 is addressed because has a slope of approximately one percent. The trees which are proposed to be removed are not needed for soil erosion control because they do not provide soil stability on a sloping portions of the site. Criteria 4 has been addressed because the trees which are proposed to be removed and consist of two small groups which are not a part of forested area. Criteria 5 has been addressed the aesthetic character of the larger area is not visually impacted because the site is not visually prominent due to the topography of the area. Criteria 6 has been addressed because of the site constraints such as the types of improvements which are existing classrooms, parking lots and playground areas and the remaining areas left to be developed provide no other alternatives which would allow parking and building additions to take place without acquiring additional property or remodeling other existing site improvements. It does not appear to be feasible to plant replacement trees on this site given the location and type of other property improvements which are developed. The largest potential area is the athletic field which must be kept clear for athletic uses. 9. Section 18.164 (Streets and Utilities) contains development standards for streets and utilities. a. Section 18.164.O30(A) requires streets within and adjoining a development to be dedicated and improved based on the classification of the street. b. Section 18.164.030(E) requires a Minor Collector street to have a minimum 60 feet of right -of -way, a 40 feet minimum roadway width, and 2 -3 moving lanes. c. Section 18.164.070(A) requires sidewalks adjoining both sides of a major collector streets. d. Section 18.164.090 requires sanitary sewer service. e. Section 18.164.100 requires adequate provisions for storm water runoff and dedication of easements for storm drainage facilities. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM FI FMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 7 The Engineering has reviewed the street and utility needs for this site. Because this facility will not directly adjoin or access a public street no conditions of approval have been recommended concerning street or sidewalk improvements. The applicant has also not proposed to extend utility services to the site. IV. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS FINDINGS: 1. TRAFFIC: The applicant has submitted a traffic report entitled "Transportation Analysis for Durham School Expansion ", dated August 30, 1995, as prepared by Associated Transportation Engineering & Planning (ATEP). The report includes traffic counts along SW Durham Road at the intersections of SW Hall Boulevard and SW 79th Avenue, together with estimates of the projected traffic generated by the school with the completed expansion. The report concludes that the increase of school traffic to 1995 traffic will not unduly affect either intersection. The report does not include traffic projections beyond 1995. In addition, the report indicates that traffic warrants to justify a traffic signal at SW Durham Road and SW 79th Avenue are not satisfied. This proposed signal has been the subject of local community discussion and has been recommended by the South Citizens Involvement Team (CIT). In particular, with the proposed construction of SW Durham Road as a part of the Washington County MSTIP program, it was the desire of the both the School District and the local community to include the traffic signal with the work scheduled for 1996. Although the traffic report does not make any recommendations for pedestrian improvements, it is the recommendation of the Engineering Department that the site plan be revised to include a six foot wide sidewalk across the school site from the proposed new building addition to the new sidewalk to be constructed in SW Durham Road. 2. STREETS: The site currently takes access from SW Shaffer Street, a local street located on the contiguous Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) property which connects to the southerly extension of SW Hall Boulevard known as SW 85th Avenue. The existing street has been improved and no changes are proposed. The new site plan shows the construction of the building addition only, utilizing the existing on -site parking lot improvements and the existing single driveway onto SW Shaffer Street. 3. SEWER: The existing school building is presently connected to the public sewer located on USA property and no changes are proposed. HEARINGS OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 8 4. STORM DRAIN. The site currently drains toward the contiguous USA property and an existing underground storm drain system upstream of the nearby Fanno Creek. The site plan does not propose any changes to the existing parking lot. However, the impervious area will be increased by the additional building coverage and the roof drainage should be directed to the existing underground storm drain system. In addition, the project should incorporate an on -site water quality facility as prescribed by the requirements of the Unified Sewerage Agency. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91-47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. The applicant should re- design the site plan to include a water quality facility that would be maintained by the School District. V. CIT & AGENCY COMMENTS 1. The South Citizen Involvement Team was notified of the proposed Conditional Use Permit. No comments or objections to this development were received. In addition, applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting regarding this request. 2. No other comments were received by the Planning Division. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division concludes that the Conditional Use request for this existing site will promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that development which occurs after this decision complies with applicable local state and federal laws. In recognition of the findings staff recommends APPROVAL of Conditional Use Permit proposal CUP 95 -0006 subject to the conditions which follow. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SMALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall re- design the site plan to include a six foot wide sidewalk from the new building addition, adjacent to the existing parking lot, to connect the existing walk to the proposed sidewalk in SW Durham Road. STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department. 2. The applicant shall include an on -site water quality facility as a part of the final site plan and shall provide a drainage report for approval of the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department. HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 9 3. The applicant shamit revised site and landscaping jib. obtain approval of the following: STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division. a. The applicant shall either provide information concerning the numbers of existing bicycle facilities or revise the site plan to add a minimum of 54 bicycle parking spaces b. The site plan is required to be revised to provide a minimum of one additional handicapped accessible parking space. c. The applicant shall apply for and receive approval from the City's Historic Sites and Districts Committee conduct a Public Hearing and determine that this addition is not detrimental to this historic resource. d. The applicant shall obtain approval from the site's franchised hauler for the proposed location. The enclosure shall also be provided with a six foot tall solid screen around the enclosure. CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL SHALL BE VALID FOR EIGHTEEN MONTHS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION. /C...(.AefZ Prepared By: Mark Roberts Date Associate Planner Xca You-kJ ems• I ' . Approved By: Dick Bewersdorff Date Senior Planner HEARING'S OFFICER CUP 95 -0006 - DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 10 • 11110 41,-. . i - . jr.:1 ttEiti t15 C I Y Itilo• 1-) 7 t ‘4111 -.I . r. ... .. . ‘ 1 . ! marTm;711. S1111112■W■M In - g i EL Rd- i mp . . 1 ,-.1raes I —ip MI, bolip --- mom if ir 6..ki . "all e."" Vengilitlin ME \ C T rt 4- Milli ilk " It 3,/ " 1 I LII -ilaidlINIIMIN ..:.• : ' ''.:-•, IGEN . . •• .... ...... .. . J_L) : Ifilffisme. WA •1 ! , g gintl .!••:.•:., - -1 „MEI I IL , ,-- -.-•-.::: • i , ...iii 4, ; . \C:' I F--i. ,, ,...,...._...,.._;.,,.:::. 1 r-- • 01 .'-. ImmreNtri-gon si I-, • ,...:.:,:••••:.! :..:•- _ 1 - • - - • • - . - - • F-12 i ■ i bk Unria IN /it i 1 I 'MOO r -;:_-_-.-,.:.•:: 1 ! 11 ._._ ,.._. _. • ,•, .1 . 1...._■17 _:_ woiii " • I -L rm a .... ..,.., 1 LLI I i _, . • . . w•ai . , a , - mow, -- R-12 I "4 == =- . i , OM r ■ 0.- :-. , i ... ..... lel F11151 11 Thalliffli - - ... ' 7. . I r F ,,, / 1 i 1 A • Ermaltrz - i . vs a 1:(F04= (5 t ' N • , e r n ; I / HASU2 e 7CE T MR ■ . -1-- • 1 . a. Ecr 1 . ...., -...& A ' • 7■ ft' ..4k. ecraCz.W. - a. =,- tr„ . ; ...:., • , •.. • 1 Z 101 . a .• gal I MO= - 7. '' zr • ....-..,,,, . -In FlEttiffn= - m • .., • - .- . mk , L.4 LI 111.1411 - ..., - Aellimi Mi ::". :•:•••::: • - . •• • • i itt ■ ■4gpi ...eanuirn al , ..pcn i 11 , , , ,,, „ 1 1 : Z P V■AV UMM i , 1 = 11111111i4bri 1 1 .-,Ti i 1 I no 1111,..._:-. I—P 1 Z — .„„„, . • '-..:_l____, . .:,:r.f,7.T. E. r , K 1 _.., , n '..Z-•;L.:• --- hOill III 2 num, r.... iiffil ~ / r - H - . . • i < - . • . :::" f j.:7.L ::,.• // ' I b. . wACO 1 r ri r ,,../.1-,*,-.. ; i., ....1 . ' I N. TIGARD j , ■ 1 MIDISTRICT . 4 /);... ' ..1. , Im. HIGH SCHOOL r CL 0 \ - — SITE --->>>> P. 41 r T AR Y GS 'S : !;9,.... . 1 u. A . . ., . „ . 1 in TREATMENT .:::--i:, cc 1-.5 , I; PLANT , : i ........ "•• .,,,,.......-, i • -,-. ''',.7= ' i (.9 di 1—P 1 . _ , li 7 .. I-- .1. ,,,,,........... v---. , . ... • . _1 Vim/ 11111 .._ millitillft IMMI U.. ... . .... .. • _.:...:. • _ • • •• NI a 1 I—P ..,. • .• • . ..._. ............„ R 12' -?-;-/- - . .... • „:„. .. ,,,/ ::,.., DuR-' -Ez RD / I • IA1111 >- .• - . . ..,..' • ///zr:,==,...:7,z/d 4.,--- jc\ 0 • • • VICINITY 1 CASE NO. . . I I EXHIBIT MAP 51 I CUP 95-0006 • I . . IL_ DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PANS l• CUP 95-0006 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PAGE 1/1 FINAL 111FR BY THE HEARING'S OFFICER A s EXH 7. '3 • RON HUDSON TI SCHOOL DISTRICT 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD OR 97223 -r--- 1 3 .Gi I V1'01 � �I`' CITY OF TIGARD June 24, 2002 OREGON Tigard - Tualatin School District Attn: Joel "Cub" Hale 6960 SW Sandburg Street Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Minor Modification Request of CUP95- 00006, Case File No. MMD2002 -00015 Dear Mr. Hale: This letter is in response to Marilee Davies' request for a Minor Modification (MMD2002- 00015) of the approved site development and conditional use permit located at the Durham Elementary School (8048 SW Shaffer Road, WCTM 2S113B0, Tax Lot 00300). The requested modification is to allow a nature area with trails, theme gardens, a 600 square foot covered patio, and a 100 square foot storage shed. The submitted site and elevation plans reflect the current conditions and proposed additions. Analysis of Modification Request: Section 18.360.060 of the Tigard Development Code Site Development Review chapter, states; "any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification." Section 18.360.050 states that the Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one (1) or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: 1. An increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage for residential development. The proposal does not involve residential development, the use is considered an institutional use. Therefore, this standard does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units. This criterion is not applicable, as this request does not involve a residential development. 3. A change that requires additional on -site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765. The parking standard for schools is based on the number of classrooms. Since the outdoor nature area is essentially an extension of an existing classroom, no additional parking is required. No parking is proposed to be eliminated by this proposal either. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. No change in the structural occupancy type of the structure is proposed. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20 percent. The applicant has proposed two new structures (a covered patio and a storage shed), the height of which have not been specified. The existing school structures on site are approximately 30 feet in height. To meet this criterion, the new structures cannot exceed the present height of the other school buildings located on the same parcel. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be affected. No changes to the site layout or accesses are proposed, therefore this criterion is satisfied. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 TDD (503) 684 -2772 - • • 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day. Since no additional classrooms are being created and the proposal will not result in additional student enrollment, there should be no increase to traffic generation. Therefore, this criterion is satisfied. 8. An increase in the floor areas proposed for a non - residential use by more than ten percent excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet. The proposal will add impervious area for the covered patio and storage shed. This expansion is approximately 700 square feet, below the 5,000 square foot limitation. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the open space area below the minimum required by the code or reduces the open space areas by more than ten percent. This proposal creates an active outdoor use area and does not reduce the amount of open space. 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational facilities, screening; and /or, landscaping provisions) below the minimum established by the code or by more than ten percent where specified in the site plan. This plan will enhance the school's amenities by providing an outdoor learning area, with theme gardens. The amount of landscaping exceeds the 15% minimum required in this zone. Therefore this criterion is met. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Conditional Use approval that is not the subject of criteria (B). 1 through 10 above. The site was approved through a conditional use process, CUP 95 -0006. The conditions of that approval are as follows: 1. THE APPLICANT SHALL INCLUDE AN ON -SITE WATER QUALITY FACILITY AS PART OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN AND SHALL PROVIDE A DRAINAGE REPORT FOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. This condition was satisfied, and is not affected by the present proposal. 2. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT REVISED SITE AND LANDSCAPING PLANS OR OBTAIN APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING: A. THE APPLICANT SHALL EITHER PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE NUMBERS OF EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES OR REVISE THE SITE PLAN TO ADD A MINIMUM OF 54 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. B. THE SITE PLAN IS REQUIRED TO BE REVISED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ONE ADDITIONAL HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. C. THE APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE CITY'S HISTORIC SITES AND DISTRICTS COMMITTEE. D. THE APPLICANT SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE SITE'S FRANCHISED HAULER FOR THE PROPOSED LOCATION. THE ENCLOSURE SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED WITH A SIX - FOOT -TALL SOLID SCREEN AROUND THE ENCLOSURE. This condition is shown as having been met in January of 1996. The present proposal will not affect compliance with this condition. Additionally, the site was subject to a Sensitive Lands Review in 2001 to correct unauthorized grading and encroachment into the Fanno Creek riparian corridor. The conditions of that approval are relevant as the current proposal is in the same vicinity as the previous sensitive lands review. Those conditions are as follows: 1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK, GRADING OR CLEARING OF VEGETATION ON THE SITE, THE APPLICANT SHALL DEMONSTRATE EITHER THAT APPROVAL IS NOT NEEDED FROM DSL OR THE CORPS, OR DEMONSTRATE THAT THE NECESSARY PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. 2. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PROPOSED IN THE APPLICANT'S EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE PUT IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK, GRADING, OR CLEARING OF VEGETATION ON THE SITE. THE APPLICANT SHALL ALSO UTILIZE THE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLEAN WATER SERVICES Page 2of3 • 1 STANDARDS. THE APPLICANT SHALL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THESE STANDARDS PRIOR TO SITE WORK. 3. THE APPLICANT SHALL REVEGETATE THE RIPARIAN SETBACK AREA AS PROPOSED IN THE WATER RESOURCES OVERLAY DISTRICT REPORT, PREPARED BY VIGIL - AGRIMIS, INC. DATED JANUARY 5, 2001. THE APPLICANT SHALL FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO REVEGETATION FROM THAT REPORT. 4. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH A SCHEDULE FOR WORK, AND PROVIDE THE CITY OF TIGARD WITH A LETTER FROM VIGIL - AGRIMIS, INC. CERTIFYING THAT THE WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THOSE PLANS ON FILE WITH THE CITY. None of these conditions have been satisfied to date according to the City's permit tracking system. No building permits may be issued for additional site work until this outstanding issue has been resolved. THIS MODIFICATION REQUEST HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING LIMITATIONS. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THIS LETTER WITH YOUR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. Limitations on Minor Modification Approval 1. The applicant must submit evidence that demonstrates the conditions of approval for Case File Number SLR 2001 -00001 and SLR 2001 -00002 have been satisfied. 2. The proposed storage shed and covered patio shall not exceed the height of the nearby existing structures on the school site. This request is determined to be a minor modification to an existing site. The Director's designee has determined that the proposed minor modification of this existing site will continue to promote the general welfare of the City and will not be significantly detrimental, nor injurious to surrounding properties provided that, development which occurs after this decision complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. If you need additional information or have any questions, please feel free to call me at (503) 639 -4171 ext. 2428. Sincerely, Morgan Tracy Associate Planner is \curpin \morgan \workspace\sdr\mmd2002 -00015 (durham school nature park).doc Page 3 of 3 • i 1 RECEIVED PLANNING MINOR MODIFICATION JUN 192002 _. t di . el'i`� re TYPE 1 APPLICATION CITY OF TIGARD CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639 -4171 FAX: (503) 684 -7297 GENERAL INFORMATION . e IZ D ? Brrh l•01 a Property Address /Location(s): _ _ /e L - Al ° ' ) g � 6' (�l�. J'h a - r a Ki e - FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tax Map & Tax Lot #(s): 7 5 l / 3 15c - ( 2) (l c\ Site Size: s s Case No.(s): �� 1) 2-032_ - 0 00( S Other Case No.(s): Applicant *: �.� i i g • Address: . E" _ �� , a Receipt No.: 2° e 2 - 2 Z '7 Y City/State: i • Zi�gT a Applications cepted By: K S l� Primary Cont- : _ � i ,,,„ — Date: �13ro2_ Phone: j ,L(a� Fax: fri r - 01. , Property Owner /Deed Holder(s) *: (Attach list If more than one) Date Determined.Complete: Rev. 3/5/2001 i:\curpinlmasters\ evised\minormod.mst c. Address: Phone: City /State: Zip: * When the owner and the applicant are different people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) (Note: applications will 119.1 be accepted must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this without the required submittal elements) form or submit a written authorization with this application. PROPOSAL SUMMARY ;5 Application Form The owners of record of the subject property request permission for a Minor Modification. To review a modification as a Minor 0, Owner's Signature/Written Authorization Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion does not ID Title Transfer Instrument or Deed invoke one or more of the 11 criteria discussed within Section 18.120.070(B) of the Tigard Development Code. If the modification C • - - . .. - - . . • • - exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the following criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major AL Site /Plot Plan (reduced 8'/2"x 11 ")I�JJ Modifications are processed in the same manner as a new Site Development Review. In a separate letter, please address the (g Applicant's Statement (3 copies) criteria below contained in Section 18.360.050(B) including a detailed (Addressing Criteria Under Section 1 .360.050(8)` response to each criteria. 1 Filing Fee (City) $100.0 • I. A An Increase an ge tha in t red ir e s unit density o lot covera n for residential development. (Urban) X $238 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dw units. \ � additional on -site park t 3. 4. A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code. 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%. In addition, the Director must find that the 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off -site traffic would be proposed change complies with the underlying affected. standards of the applicable zoning district. To 1. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and increase can be expected to exceed 100 complete this review, the Applicant's proposal vehicles per day. must include a discussion indicating how the 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a non - residential use by more than 10% excluding site expansion will continue to comply with the expansions under 5,000 square feet minimum setback, building height, parking land 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space that reduces the landscaping standards. Other applicable open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more requirements such as minimum Clear Vision \ than ten percent areas near driveways and street intersections 10. A reduction of project amenities (recreational (adlities, screening, and/or, landscaping provisions) may also be applicable depending on where below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10% where specified in the site plan. the building expansion is proposed to be II. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of Site Development Review approval that are not constructed on the site. the subject of Criteria 1 through 10 above. 0 • ' ' APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete, you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained, upon request, for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this / day of A / 20_ ' / 04.. A — _4_ 1 • , er's Signat We Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature DURHAM ELEMENTARY 603 431 4510 06 /02 05s21pm P. 002 • . . . Durham School Nature Area We plan to use the 1/3 acre parcel between Fanno Creek and Durham School as an outdoor nature investigation and observation site. Approximately half of the land has been, or will be, re-planted in native species, the other half will contain an outdoor shelter, grassy class- meeting arca, and theme gardens that enhance our science, social studies, writing, reading, and art curriculum. The indigenous plants will be located most intensely along the sensitive watershed border with Fanno Creek, but will also wrap around two other borders of the nature area., including the berm that was formed to screen the site from the adjoining soccer fields. Where the berm meets the main entrance we plan to have a recirculating waterfall built from boulders with a small pond . A path will travel through the plantings, called the "Lewis and Clark Trail". We will create booklets and outdoor signs identifying the different plants and explaining their value to the Native Americans and pioneers. We will also identify how these plants are beneficial to local wildlife. Other theme gardens will include a Butterfly /Hummingbird Garden, a Heritage Garden, and a Japanese /Len Garden. .A small, wild, year -round pond in the center of the site provides a home for amphibians, birds, and insects such as water boatmen and dragonflies. The grassy area and outdoor shcltcr will provide a meeting place large enough for whole class lessons. The shelter would make it possible for classes to meet there even when it is misty or very hot:. During independent study times, the children could scatter to picnic tables or benches throughout the site. It has been my observation that the students have a keen interest in observing nature at work in their "backyard ", and in helping to create this area. They are very enthusiatic about doing everything from cutting back invasive species, to planting seedlings, to watering baby plants, to spreading barkchips for pathways. They are becoming active stewards of the land they depend on for a healthy life. I've noticed that they are also more willing to settle down when we return to the classroom setting, and are able to concentrate more easily on indoor lessons after a good workout in the garden. After the basic gardens and structures are in place, we plan on engaging the students in various art projects, such as mosaic murals, or vintage garden tool sculptures. Other extension activities could include compost bins or recycling projects. This childrens' garden will truly be a wonderful place for Durham's little sprouts! Marilee,Davies 7 c 1Y 'et -Dt i/16"44 , 185' SOCCER FIELDS y F 25' , 15' TO DURHAM SCH00 .11 In .25' _ N ENTRANCE �• c° 58' _0 x ,,,- ) ��. f 0= o X X X x • 0 _ I -0,9-5 n c,, 53' r ;rte_U. ,1 � ,.; 15'_ " �;'` c���o 4' 14' ', 10' 0 30 `0 '' 17' r ,/ I ��'-0: t ;ter , . r�I v: ; � � � « , co : Lam, t . : . ' - �. f� r i L .:,...,..,,p.,..„.,.?,, , S r � { ?{ ., (� ,.. `e, , ii ; , i y� � r , ry�t; t co rcm , y qOf - -- p.=' ,_, , -- 0; , /- - " ( , ` j +E�i's -: ( V • `l - 7 5^ ,rItc _ ° , . • % %�� 10X1' 1 o n v (, rn �� n SHE �`- M X - N 20X30 COVERED \ Cl co 0 0 \ 6' j SLAB i. N fr n N. 0 --� °� ti r-�.-- , � °--( 6' , .. f0 _5_0.- - j Y La tO co _ v ' `� ,w�f . . J l � L L. � t - 1 ,. � '. 1. - � ��f (� . 7 V '�( , L 1 J • • • ...-,,We. �( U L �rx �. a xr r , S" r ) N i'i t.) / '7' q' r• O Z 1 Z 20' Q cv c E O N 75' o« 25' 25' 25' � � L— — —x --x x x 170' ^ , _ . - _____Cp W ,I . two (.01 er ., • • �� U .S.A. PROPERTY SCALE:1 " =20' DATE: 05.06.02 t DURHAM 7 �'� SITE PLAN :1 NATURE AREA r . : ''iA,i•ir',.. •tli •• .. ,,. ,.. ..... - • . • - irt,i ifi , C",' . - ' , I .• . - ,,,,,,.. ..,-. 4.,..• • . -......., • .. ...:_i ., • . t. -.• • , i•••• --,gt.,,f 7- "N ,, ,, , , , .•47N;.k.,:.-/:. 1 ,, . .,. . , s. ,..c...-. • - .: 4.,..:r„,.• . t , '';iff` ..4. , t% l''' ,•..., l 'r, i . , t'■;•:1, ' . f ...*? - % . • •_. 2 ..... t'-' .:, ' ' t it!. : ` 7 „,.. .... . 4,4 ,i):;;I+,: ',7'''' tillal 4, ti , .. S ; ‘ '. qe ..'s4,0. .. :4,:...... ...,..,, - . ,. 7 ..:-• • -,. • . ,.. ..• - ,•• - • . - , I , ..7■■••:::::•,'qX.VICTING, Ai , * ,.. , , '. 7,,, ..,7 " ri •: ‘,' '. I. :, : , 4;1 4-011.0 '. : '4'. *" ..,. • . lir "' 6 1 ! ‘'.• • ..' • * .1i1 • • . 2, ' . .. ‘ . .}14 1 ' ' ."! .! . . Or:U6•' T ..■, : N . , .. • ' . r.. ,,r1r ... , • •• ' , • •4 .. • , ' i , . • 10 '* •::;;; -:--..-.---.7..----=.----n-FpNCT.ION 'AS A GR AVEL • ' - ' . - ' - "I'' ' ' .. .. .• ...- ...,..., , , . : j • , ...; • .1 ,•;),-,;,•,) . v ith r. , ....,:, - z • , el ,■-• ‘.. :-.. i. - I t • ..,-/- .: , . ..)„, .... • r,., .. CE 7 - 4 . - % - .,....• ''..-..: , 7"...-.:-._=...,...4 --,:- ,• •„ •• .. .:•••t,• •././ 4: ,• • . 4!. ,. ••• • c . ..., , , 1 ;,' . 6..:;.',.i d ....0.-ji el tj;Ad.t9 1 1 11 kAic, L ,',..• 'r'',. • ',, - ..l. ..:,. - '''''.• r 4:,.' :4 ' I ,k.....-.. 1— .3 • . , 4 OS ILL .:0 , '. - P. '''' , '''.. - 1 1 '..''A"-?u - L'4 1.'-'''.■1 • ..". : a ISTINW 1 ,,,,,,,..c. .,.. ,„„_.... - k : .Z,1*...: 1-='...t--:_:!::.-7-.::-...:::, ".'•'---TV13 xi:,;- • ..'" • . i- -: _= -. -7:—: : : ...arts.:::rorp IN cADjAC •-• -- -,-,--r!-...;\:,---; I 1.,;.,...,„ . ,!, : *&.. I II kid • 1 ' k . ,. - ,c,- . ..,t ) ,1 • 'f- , - -.ii...• ) ' i all P '.'-'' 0 0.,q .•'.)F •‘•,,.,./.-:• ' •:•s•^7." '..-...: ...,: Icx:.- •1 ■1 !. . - Z - - - z - 7- -- - -- 7 -- 1, ' . i ' RgiP.ARK A . P FIN„,i,T, l '' ) , f . •igiWi.J,1.4., 4.:.-a.l..:7.1,:..2..,:::,A'...K.';,:iL',i,:-.:;'::'...-YA'.,': ... ' ''. '' ti.4..,„: v s . , , .",c'..•;i l t,=...:;g: ,': ,;.'.z. . ..-:- ------1- '3'. . ' iSTI NO, T O PS Y- 1 ! . ';.7'r , !' ,1 t , .....!•377... f•:.''' '.''',1,'•:•-il..,,,...-,-,"*-00!k'i•:;',-,,:,;'•':-.1.1,..r4'.:7-:'1',V,,i: . .4;It'•-` - .:!:-. FENCE ...TO'''... BE ••••••:. ...-_-_-.......=...., ,. , . L ..„....- ,.. '','' ..41 ,. • ... .,..• ,,,._,,y,... ,.. • t .....: ..4.z. .... . - .: F. . .- • --" -.---:-- --- RtusED ON-SITE 17 0 • 1 ... ..., . • '.-‘.:• , .. , ..;:..11;k:-. +•••••,----.- • : ..,,„;-. , . .../. . ,,.,,s.: ....,.... AND ' REMOVED ' ,- - NECESSARY "TO •-•,•: ••,' . Ir. . ....,-. - ",..,...'. . ,',. 40.V,RELOCATED .:. . . z-I' DEGREE NECE •• ._ ....,..:- ,--- ..4.,.: ; . , .. , ---9 , 6‘7.,..c.:: .iigi. • "I-. :: :1*- ,...,...- • . . , ---- #pLANTI NG 4. - 0 p .: p 0 ,,.:',....! ,:.;.- ,?..;,,,... . .f.- .t.. ,•- .E.,--.:.....=-.-27. EsrABus1-1 • ..,:::;;; • 1 • :::::.,:::_is' • .% .r A ;"A''."..-',1 . k, .\.' :. , ',.' • •,.-., , ..'''''"+...'!..: -... ' .-* . • i----C--- BEDS:: !.:.....“.' .. .. •Ji.'"': • ' • .,-; , .. • . • .. , ..:.„ .., N .,„, .., . .,,, .. _..,. ... .. .. . .... , ..7 , . ,,.. ,. ..„, .. .- ,.. . 4,;',■;:h..,,,.,,,rillt:: .....irt..A.;„,,liq 'Y ', „, ■ ,-;::‘,‘!',,,... • :"..4 :11*,:i!ir.• ... • le' *•: :: • ''.. .....••••: i,7, 4.4 ,,,,.■:.' :: . . - .' ..•:,. ,,. :! - '; '. • .„4 • ,,' 1. .. ...:,`.■`17`e6.1.:i14‘.1.‘4`;;,.., .-.:-....--_-_,. • ......k.',:". .....r. ,. , ... , i"- -„... •'........p.,„ ..,•:,:s.....,... ,...,0;,.......„..s 1. ,•,,..... 4 .,0,-. st.. ..,.. • „,4 ,>. .•:', ... •-.. ," - ... . • .. :....q ::.:4:,.., - .. i..:,k, , • 1 — „ , ... , i, --, ...4 7., , - - , ...' 4 0'.'• - ' er , IV • 11 , M,_ . ,,, 4 1. :5 • ..• :` . r -,, ..• ..h• II ' ., - 1 ', • it,,,, , . • • *1, • . m " — ...4 • . , r,t.,1 it. l',7 , ji • .1 , .. .,-. 0..r , , ;`, ..7." • ---....-= .• • Pi. • :'-i 7' : 1 't T ' ' ;i;.::':.4.- N ': ''''' inALy,"•:,.%"':13,.;,,,i'.... 'c'A. ;VI ......:'.•' ' ' 1.f.( ' 4 •=7....-- ,i . . ....vi :. ''.:;.,:•:":"-;-:.:'l • '''''',.: ', 4t-4:4'1.:1441,!,:f 0,t. .'',..‘°, -*•;„ ''-i'''' .'•re r, • .., 1 .- .. . .P :',.!•:.:"....: . • ...kr .. ";;........3' ,....1.-7-:— - •..,,,,.&:, .,,,, j,. - , '.!.k , '• .:i's •-, ,.,,,, 4 , 4 3 ...,t...,..... Ac.... ',-.?, ''.i., -,r„ ,.„;. ' i',...- ...... ,. -: , A -,,..!i.".. Top o .:,,, , . ., f F ),... ... -7.• r __ . ' • ,.,....=:',;.''',:. DCIST1NG: ..GRAvti4...r1:.1.,....‘4:-...„j.'•.:4,i• :-....`;•::;4:,*.t,tt-2,,„iY:t:. *A ' . • "- 4 •;..cw....i5L „BANK ... ....0 - '- ENTRANCE DR)Y.E.,:::',;:.,:ij,..v..:;.;.- -'i',-,....4434.c.ii-74.210.•,,..•;,..„:',47-' '....„ -• - •••••••,ii:1:...,&! ,• -'' •' • , •••.' ..... .. .,,,, . 1 . 1 V : :::..... t 4 l'fit. ,,, ,. .. ,,.,,V. 4 e1„ . ... • :: , , • C";:.:.., ..'... :: • - . . . ...,. 1 : , • :, • ii,... • . .1 ,;;:d . . ' ::::......... .. ,! • ',,.■■• il.. ,t • .. : , :l'."1!, ...:.• .. ` ;.;:. 't ilt, - ; • .r . i. ' ! . .2% '... ". •.;`'.'. -:,:f:Te-P.'" S - P.ErA ' . .• Al ••••'' .- -,.. • 'uorts- ' .,,'-' .34V'1' : .." " • OCER . ' ' '''' " "ri ''''''1'iiAA)(.• '' ' ' ' ' '.* '. ''' - .• .:.--:-.,-__ • ,. :. .,. •t.-.. .. ., • ExisTING,sp , , . .. •,...„ ...!..,...,,, .. . • • ,,., ..,..„ , . . .- . • i .A.,...., - ,........ :?.,.. ..', :.,-,... • "A * .} 0 1t.... ...ag• 0 • •% •••• . 1 "7 ' ' ' ;''.1.'' . • ...y ' ':•• '''''":-.:;:. ' •-•?' ..,i 1 * . ":`. • .'" FIELD ,:.'•': ...,,,--''.,.-.• • -:; :"' 4 '.-- .''''..''-' Y' • • , ' ;.-4. , r .114. N tzl , -'..! :Cf:, ' o... 4.0 ,, ' -., . - -• t 4' . --,• ' .- Z ,- - --•!' ,, le ',4i,,e'' .... • ...-..., .. ':‘,......"tr•-,,v ,•:...ZA........."-tV.....`;!...s: .' '''''....:-.: .,:t.,.; 1.-:ik' 49„ ,..,' ''•,--. ' ',' .,.. • - 't . .'i,.:, -, : ' "''' ..z.i . '. . --7,--7s:i...t.1:'...':;5;1t`H..."..:". :•:.07:'''' ,.,, ., , wi•P - -.4,..,4, - .;...1/4., i 7;.:......- • . 1 zr.,-- • .- • •--- • ----..-- - : 7 :: • : . :-.: .3 . - :-.' . 14 , - - i - : - ..:;. . ::1.,..-..,;,:::.,:::::Irum-,,f,',..- o h....-.1,5Z4-, 'AA /,fp ','.'. '.. ...i,,t =... .,''..-''... , e•-• .,,• . • . • -_-_-__-_-.1.., . ...• • , ... • ,: ri ,!'' • - ' ,' ..•....; ...f.;. ..:■:',,2,,,..:.7. `7,;,i ; , iis,'..t.;771,kif. ,'""t1A.S. / 1 '. ../ , •'''. , . I, ee !,. ..'Y ,lit ': . ••■• - ' ,,_''. 4=-17-- . 5 k ...i, ... ,.. • . .. ".•........:. ' ''''',',•• r.-•,-riti,:.:- I '1. 'I ' ; t: . , ' '.:i: ' ■4 .;''.. e. , SOIL ' STOCKPILE__ / ..;: .'i'i . ::: . •'. :.::i.;',.drits::-.:•:::::Ti„'Wv!4V4 ... :iii; '.. s/.',;. . ,. r.,'N. ,.:. ...J.*, . '-' ,;: ., •c .., .. ,., - .:. .. owl- 1 - ,; , ..,,. .t•vy ::::::-- - .4 . : .• ,.. w‘ •:...sTRAW 'INA ,Wm a- ',•,.ii'..:•'.?:;;1•''.7...:.:;'•-!...e.q:1'....irt...tie,a.r` , ..,E . .•,,,_ ,.,1,1-..N,-,f,,,,,. ..1,.......i., -...4,7,0c4:. .-. . i . ., . . / .: :. ..,:.'. . - ,,, .,..„...4: ::.......,,F.,',.: a it A i t'Z'' . * ' 4' krk, - 1 , -, • ,,,, ..,v, 4# r- .. - . ;'' . -' ''. .. 5 cy±:.,;,•,- TO.logyr., .; - ... -, ,i-: - ' ' • ,• • .. ..it , 4.iA, , . .,,,,, ,,,.rt e , . ... ,C,' := .T.. , •-• - , (.0,;;A- 4,./....7: , : , 4 . ,..4 i , .,., • .., . , ., . 11. :. ,, !..:IL '''' ' ‘.• - .., ......i. :....,,,..,,,"; - ;.* . ij',:' ..,...,. :..: . . ..f;':.1 ql ::::..: ..:-,..:•••••:::-;.:" ..",'''s.i-tt 4' i . • • " c,-.•;:- •• pr- - : , Y - -''',. • . " ' 44'-e• _::::::..-7.:- ,0490;""40...liepl .. • . . • '-',,....., ..,.;;',...... . , i.... • :. ,..- ..i- -•:: , ,, , ...c. , :.,... . f: . , • .$../ ,:t.' 1 " -. . - - . '''$4..;,.,1i! , .. . 7.•.,..,..........,:i.,,..,...,...;.i..::::.,,...::.....,...:::::,,„,„.....................,....,.......,,,,;.,......,.:„:„...,i,:,,..i..::......,....r.• ..,..:,.,,,.,,,,,..:,.,.i.........vii::.,:.,:..,..,.,..y,,:„..,:,,4,..„.., RESEED - • ..• ... . .•-•. . ,,,,,, .0, , _ , • - - •-, ;...,,, ...,*-, .. .AA , pf EljirNEEDEDY'' . ' " ;•.'". ,.. -1 . A.C4VAat s. . ' / i s t --=1 ---- 4 ' . "•'-' . - . ' • — "--7- . • • • • • • - • • • • • • Or 4 ,..4. : ..4.,..0,,.. ; \ tl...,, :: z..„.7.4..1:r7:4.214,..17:.::,.....4:.:7,„4.....4:,:t. C • „... ■ 4T. ,.. ", ),, ; * . ,.. "L""-Z-a. " • APPX. FENCE ...., '. FiELOGATED, r04-,,_ A.,-.4:-Yo • ,,. •,.....,. .....??.,- , ' : c.t .. ' ..i;" .'. • '-'1,..67:ikill".4'..e • 4 et,-- ,. li,' . " 1 k 17 s ' ' ‘ki: 4.: 0_ ______ ,.___NLY,ALLOWABLE • ,,...,.:',.' .'!:':, ..::,...' ' ' . .,' f',fi' ■ '-' ik, ,;', .;', ..... ..-4,.... , ''-.■ `'.... : 't.....1 ENTRANcE•MRINT .. .i.4..: :•'. A .o. „. .,, .tst,:o ‘;,..,. - . 1 r i' k-,1,-.. ikk' -.. ;Ifs= ''''',, : :...........,-, ...,.... .., : - ..,.. •' '''h !,,,._. ,.... a' ;, - ',. .... fL, --•,:-.: ,....., Al t,-,tii,,.,, q •k.,r..(,.:44'' ,,,,, ''7' li ' ;'•,rit- '. '-') .',.: ''''.• I .-., - , ' ' ' ''. 7r.' 4.'1 .1.. 3 .... . P:. :',' Z ;" . . . ' 3 , ..4t' A : ! P .',147...• 1 ' . i . ..... . • ,....' " I'. ' e • . , : 1:.$,; . • ,..4 4,1 t , '-•• ,,,„ , . . r- Iv , tt..,,, ,, o „ ,.. k .., , . '... if .!'';:i14-;;Z:E..,- .c' , •-:,"1"1:......4 7 i :" ''' fA i t i ..h .6 ,14. ..: 4. i. : 1;. !.7, . :4 ,. : ... fr - t i : , 4 t . i , ' : ', .;....., 1 1 .:'1 .,, ,.. i .n . t %5 L,: ; .... -' s,. .: .- 1 1 .1 .. , ,,,,,,. • ... .: ti :I .I . ,.7 1.i . :). 13 :t, , : u . ',..14 1.. " , ,f .,:,1,, ,..; :c ., ,.. .. ,, , '' '''.34- liNIIS4 I . ' '1 . 1. , .,k ,• ,, l': '' • , fl•• ''''.. . .....:7- • '.t - , •.',4„4.;, :-; NA . RE ' • - ..i . - 7 ' FUTUR :' ili 1 '. . ''''*""41'''''..•' '-211"tcr-.*A':i4.:1*:1•.,--v.,!1,...:,...::-.4"'"A j•R:,:...:".4".11.:4 0 KA - .,. -.; , .',..'izck• ,,,- - ,,- ..ii , .. , i.'-- ". z; : , . .,, 1 4 . -r.4 : '' . -, v. -, ,:. ' • . . i .0 L , • • • ..- . , 'W.'... ..,,. i ..41,4 • ., ..i., 4. f1-.... .4/J.,.. ,, .... >I. 1.,,,," re"; • t,-** , . , y,P+ Iver. ..,...: tl . ,,,: , f, : -,. ...„ 7: ... • fr'w,):: t ,A;h4:1:' 41.*: , EIJI' lig i ,..• . ., *.... A • ... , , • ,i . , ,., it ,.. -. , , ,-,•,.. - . 1 ‘,. ‘J's 'Lt...... , i r,,,; '"?....i t% 4 i . a 4- • 1 . i ti ....,_ _2 • . ....,1,1 ,..',.. , •,. . ..x. .: , :,,,, . , TOP OF BANK - ii,,,,.,,,... •-•,.,.....,,,...... , .,•,. „ ir.t....w; A). - • • . ,,,. . * ,..,,,A....... .,.,;,;,.. ,., ' :-.; ..: '..':':.••. i Nii;;I'AN,, .. . , * '1. . 4ftie ,...,,i tly, ,Ot. , . `" › - ' - .it- l'•■••:11,-';".. ':." .''...• ';'''F ;, ,..','■' - ;,' • s.• i:.i'. t‘ .r.!,;Ni,t• , -, :' . , . ii • ....,p.. • ,:tii. . ,0 :.- 4,1'1; ..' ''. '. '', '; il.' "•', : “: . ::: : • ,1 .... ' i' ' • ,.. . • , . "'ll v . • ..•k,...1...1 . , .,...: : A.. . -,, '..4::',...!4-L.,;Cf;.t!fi-...i.j,,r,,..t...- --. 'tf.:t43t4ottz' - - ,a,..n.v.' '''''' . ' ''' pinetram•-•.;...2iFill;7147.",;itr--,;•142,-.:''.;v,-.'"4-'',1,e O. Ilit -I.' ,' • • :;.': .. . - - ty;...4.......ort 1 -. '• .:..1.-,..a , - . .,.... .,!..,.., -.« • ;; I :*•' ..1 k. '".. . , ... n1 : : ::7-f '1 ;.... .7. , .. .. ti....4. .., ('411. . :. , .1 1 . .. '.. . : , ..r ::!,;, rt.,'. ,,:: !...'. ,.....'"o• : ';' S-i.' if,- ...;14.; S‘. '- lt.,'... 20-.§R.':"k I; , 4. 40 : ''', --;;;•:... •Y!,2 - '' .. .. .et". • !_[!1 t i l' ' '7:1-**,; *':-''''''i f : . .;:'• ' ..'e' '. ! . '''. . fi.... ':::..... q ki t ',..„, 1,''''' . ' . . i ' '''' '?".;": :: '' .V '. '' 't.A. 1t7 . :t- , 1:f.'..1.,:r:7,,,,,74,4' kb • , ....4V .1 . , ';;4._, % `". i' .N: .!.. $ .- :.;'«• :.‘:, ' :,..-.. , tr..7.-...': , iv:-.;.42. — .' ' 1 , -z-s , ... -' - .....;,,,..t. . ,,),....... ;1:7 „....„ 1..N5, , - ..?,,,,,,;.,^Q...11..i.,:;4",•1;04t,':',..,:i n...,'' ' 0 , - , u',1 ' ....1 f.....,::: ' : . 4' • ' • .. Y'0',::71,"'110...t4,40i.i. ,': , N„,'...;Phi....4411.r'tlaf'4q... . 1' 0 25' 50' 00 AL E 1 • Figure X _ _ VIGIL ■ AGIRlh'llS, INC. Engineering. LondscaPe Architecture. Enviranmenicl Science ERO SION CONTROL PLAN 4504 SW Corbett Ave fel: 503.274.2010 Portland, Oregon fax: 503.274.2024 97201 web: www.vigll-agnmis.com • Durham Elementary School City of Tigard SLR200 I -0000 111101111111 ;— la „",,,,",_ -_ se pull CITY of TIGARD - ma I- ,,, , 0100,A.HIC IM FORMATION SYNTIY I. ..... % Wi N VIIIrte Mr_ MN. -- ..EN .: a � , / A uir ��' E n -Nis 1:11111111114, . I VICINITY MAP .�I� y �e -- III -uinummIr o 1 Er /11 mow ow 1 111 I 1 • MOOM i 1Il� � /I � s 111111 /� �� � �' ��� 111 1 Pti h / - /'. E ) _F s ._� 02001-00002 & *� fo ..La ° 0 ' s— DURHAM �. . : \ Anil . �AIvF � a - ELEMENTARY P. : :a I iliI a� W P •• LN SCHOOL RIPARIAN AVON 111 I m �tt♦111 1 1 ������l��r�11 X111i� MITIGATION �i 010�� 11111111. Iowa N�.= azim �� IMIMI 1 (�11H��I i ° 7 DURHAM RD O ,,; .. S P� .,, • Ili: . SIT `yoLR 1a R o 0. ..., • I s N illi ,rzg 4... O 0 200 400 600 Feet I I 1)0 1'. 498 feet ilk :xlJ 0I. City of Tigard I Information on this map is for general location only and MI ' ' should be verified with the Development Services Division. 13125 SW W Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 - / `I. ��T(1AI c „ httpl /www.cLligard.or.us C lsm mu nity Development ^ �t� r Plot date: Jun 22, 2001; C:\magic\MAGICO3.APR • 11 111 4 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95 -0006 FILE TITLE: DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION APPLICANT: Tigard - Tualatin School District OWNER: Same 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 684 -2235 REQUEST: A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. CIT: South CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request PHONE NUMBER: (503) DECISION MAKING BODY STAFF DECISION PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 X HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: 10/23/95 TIME: 7:00 CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639 - 4171 x317 CUP 95 - 0006/ DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION NOTICE OF 10/23/95 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING • • I • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Sensitive Lands Review xvv CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall, PO Box 23397 � Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639 -4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY p CASE NO. 1( I, S d O� b OTHER CASE NO'S: WI 15 c75 G o/Q RECEIPT NO. Z APPLICATION AC PTED Y: DATE: Z L/ 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Application elemen s submitted: A PROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION Durham Elementary School CA pplication form (1) 8048 SW Shaffer Lane Tigard, OR 97224 Owner's signature /written TAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. WCTM 2S1 13BA & 13B au orization Lot 400 & Lot 300 C) Title transfer instrument (1) SITE SIZE 8.48 AC !j (D) Assessor's map (1) PROPERTY OWNER /DEED HOLDER *Tigard - Tualatin School Dist. Site plan (pre - app.checklist) ADDRESS 13137 SW Pacific Hwy PHONE 684-2235 (F) Applicant's statement CITY Tigard, OR ZIP 97223 (pre -app. checklist) APPLICANT* (G) List of property owners and ADDRESS . PHONE addresses within 250 feet (1) CITY ZIP _ (H) Filing fee (1365) *When the owner and the applicant are different 45-6 people, the applicant must be the purchaser of record i�ev ~fl or a leasee in possession with written authorization DATE DET NI TO BE COMPLETE: from the owner or an agent of the owner with written �' Z � authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE: submit a written authorization with this application. COMP. PLAN/ D SI_NATION: 2. PROPOSAL SUMMARY / l� 1 1 The owners of record of the subject property request conditional use approval to allow Nom. _j o Completion of Durham Elementary School Hearings Officer Approval Date: for student capacity of 600 Final Approval Date: Planning Engineering 0736P/23P Rev'd: 3/88 3. List any variance, sensitive lands permit, or other land use actions to be considered as part of this application: iJS.S s/T� 4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this application. 5. THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. DATED this 24 day of A„ 19 95 i . SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject propert AMMIlb 7 Rona R. Hudson Project Manager (KSL:pm /0736P) • • • 9 st eas „m o •. • • • TUALA1 4 • \ , ,' 1 VICINITY MAP - DURHAM ELEM. SCHOOL vc.l 0.• 1' -0' D - VCIN ADDITIONS AT DURHAM ELEM. SCHOOL "'G 8048 S.W. SHAFFER C . TIGARD ,OREGON v V S ELIG /LEE /RUEDA 0 Anon: « CUP 95 -0006 DURHAM SCHOOL (Page 1 /1) 2S112CC 01801 2S113B0- 00401; • BOWEN, RICHARD L AND TERESA CASTILE, JAMES W EY PO BOX 94 7800 SW S RD TUALATIN OR 97062 AM OR 97224 2S113B0 -00500 2S112CC -01900 CASTILE, JAMES W & AUDREY COTTER, EDWARD E AND 7800 SW PETERS RD VIOLA C DURHAM OR 97224 8065 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97223 2S113BA -00300 2S112CC -02000 DURKEE, RALPH D & MARY H GOBLE, MARION MARLIN CO TRUSTEES 8025 SW DURHAM RD 7910 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S113BA -00400 2S113BA -00200 HAMBACH, HAROLD C & MILDRED M METZGER, DAVID G /DIANNE S HAMBACH, MICHAEL V AND PO BOX 275 BROWN, LORENE ET AL SHERWOOD OR 97140 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S112CC -05900 2S113BA -00500 NEWBERRY, MICHAEL H PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC C 15954 SW 81ST CT 121 SW SALMON ST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97204 2S112CC -05800 2S112CC -06000 ROGERS, CYNTHIA R SAYLER, DEBORAH A 15932 SW 81ST CT 15976 SW 81ST CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S113B0 -00300 2S113BA -00401 SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23J TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY NO 23J TIGARD OR 97123 13157 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD OR 97223 2S112CC -05700 VICKREY, L EDWARD 15910 SW 81ST CT TIGARD OR 97224 0 6 A 11111 Ni / tg-- 1 l!: I JT l F 1 N p :� 111111� z 1— ► - ► 11111 w 111 Ivy. 1- 2 Win . w DURHAM RD Q 4 q Q a y W 3 y‘c ,(41M R0 0 ■ z — • s, z iii i 1 110 c_ II oll a w Q =I 0 jr■ 1 F ig i I I N I I= :iIIIIIIiii` ' .., :PPM AI IR I : d I U VICINITY MAP CASE: CUP95 -0006 Durham Elementary School NOTE: MAP IS NOT TO SCALE N c.W mpMU3..p1 OtlltW Ub t 0 0 A t CITY OF TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: Per Attached FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95- 0006/HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW (MIS) 95 -0018 A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet.. A Historic District Review as the site is a historic district site. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - September 11, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. — Please contact of our office. — Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V h► (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 95- 0006/MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REOUEST FOR COMMENTS . 6 LP qc.-000‘ , • REQUEST FOR COMMEND 1 / -,- qs a NOTIFICATION UST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPUCATIONS . .!....:•:•• . •:. .: :::-•:::::::::::::::::: ••:::•:,••• ••;•.:::ii::-:::;::::::::::::-: : ifilvOLVEIVitilt:TEAmt::::::•:::::::::::: :. .- •:,.: .:.::::.:•::::::-..... ' :::•:•:.:•?:::.:::' : • • • ..::::•-:: :.:•::::;::::::::::::. „,:.........: .. ..,....:•:: ::: ....,....: ... . :„„,..:....,..„,......:„.:. , .... . •::'•::.•:.::. .. : .. •::::::::::.ii::::::; . - . :::,.... {circiap e} _ L.,..-Cir Area: (N) 6 (0 '• Placed for review In Library CIT Book •• CPO NO. CEIY::.•DERARTMEN*Ogaii:iii::: ::•••.::::::: (./...-- DEPTJDave Scott, ma. offidal ..... _1 . 2 9LICE DEPTJKelly Jennings T Acker, matnt spvtr. ill Y ADMINJCathy Wheatley, aty Raw. N EPTJMIchael Anderso*ev. Review Eng. COM.DEV. DEPTJD.S.T.'S — ADV. PLNGJCarol Landsman, senior Planner ATER DEPTJMichael Miller, ocerations mgr. — ..... . .„... . ... . . . . . .. SPECIAL.:p1STRICTS...:::::::::::: . -:.; •:::: . ::::•': .:. .:::::,..,:.:.:::.:::-.::::::::,..:.: ... .::::::::: .. . . . . ::::•:::::::::::::.•:.•••,...::.* .. ...::::i::::•:• 1--- MARSHALL jelig SEWERAGE AGENCY TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST. — Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745 Wa. County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton, OR 97075 (pick-up box) Hillsboro, OR 97124 :•::. . ::. . ::::'i:::::::::::::.::.:::::::::' . : . . . ::::::::::::::::::: . :•::::•::::::::::::::::•.: ::.: ..::::::::::::::::.::::',::::::::::::::.:?::.::::::::;:::::::::.:::::::::::::::•::::::,::::::;::::::::.::. :.•:::.:::::::.....:...• :::::: :::::,:::'::!:: :: :::.:. : 2..: •.• ...i.: ..:::.:. . • . • .. • • • : :••::: '::':'::::::::.• •• .....•:•: :•:::•::::.: ::::':i..i'i:::::::iT::::•:::::::::::::::::::•:'.: : WA. CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION METRO-GREENSPACES 150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. j16, Suite 540 Mel Hule (CPA's/ZOA's) Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue Portland, OR 97232-2736 _ _ Brent Curtis (CPA's) STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION Jim Tice (IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi I- _ _ ODOT/REGION 1 _ Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Laurie Nicholson/Trans. Planning ___ V‘ott King (CPA's) Portland, OR 97225-0412 123 N.W. Flanders L./Tom Harry (Current Planning App's) Portland, OR 97209-4037 Lynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) ___ OREGON DLCD (CPA's/ZOA's) 1175 Court Street, N.E. _ OTHER _ CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem, OR 97310-0590 Larry Conrad, Senior Planner _ CITY OF PORTLAND PO Box 4755 — CITY OF DURHAM Planning Director Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager 1120 SW 5th PO Box 23483 Portland, OR 97204 CITY OF KING CITY Tigard, OR 97281-3483 — City Manager — CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO 15300 SW 116th — CITY OF TUALATIN City Manager King City, OR 97224 PO Box 369 PO Box 369 Tualatin, OR 97062 Lake Oswego, OR 97034 . ::: - ::::i::::::::::::::::::: - :::::::::if::::: • : : • % :::::::::::::::':::::::: - ::::::::::::•.::: . :::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::;:iii::::::::::::::::::::::i.::i: - :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::SpECIAVAGENCIES::: : :::::::: . : : •::•::::::: : ::::::::::::::::::::*:::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : ::::;:;:;:i.:: : :;:mmi:.::::::::::;:m:ii• ; :;•:;:;:::::::: : :;:;:• : ::::::: ; : : :.: - : ::-::::::.-::::::•::.:,-;::::•:::•:••:-::•:•:::- -• -..::•:.:•::::::::::•:::•::::::::::,•:::•:•:•:::-::::::•:::::::::::::::::::•::::•:•:::::•::::::::::::::,::::::::::::::::::::::••.....:•:••••::•::•::•••:••:•:••••::: .. • . : . •::•••:::::::::..::::::,•::::::::::::•••:.::•:•:•:: . •:•:•:::•:::::-•::::: :::::::• . ::•: • GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC ik:ICZTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COLUMBIA CABLE CO. _ _ _ Jim Wieskamp, Engineering Brian Moore Craig Eyestone PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Tigard, OR 97281-3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton, OR 97005 NW NATURAL GAS CO. PhOnft 1509 721.2440 METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS L 1< TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT _ _ Scott Palmer Fax (509 721-3503 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox, Project Planner 220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 NE Holladay Street Portland, OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland, OR 97232 Beaverton, OR 97006-4886 — — — TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON US WEST COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO. Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Duane M. Forney, PLS-Project Eng. 3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 800 NW 6th Ave., Room 324 Portland,.OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Union Station Portland, OR 97209 :::::.:.• :.::-.::.:.••: STATE:: ACENCIES:::::. .; :.'::.:::•.: ::;:::::;:;•':......:.;';::::::: ::•;•:::::'-':::..:::-::.' • .: '• '.:'::: -.:..;::::.,:::.-? .....,:: ...:.:: • ::;;. .: :'i. FEDERACACENditt:YM: ......::'..,:::::...,....,..- : .....:......„.„,...... ': . .::::::::.:.:.:::-...::.::::-::.::::::: . ..:.:.::::.,::......-...,... .,: AERONAUTICS DIVISION (ODOT) DIVISION OF STATE LANDS 11 - - 6OSTAL SERVICE _ _ _ _ ___ COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H. PARK FISH & WILDLIFE Randy Hammock, Growth Cord. _ _ PUC DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Portland, OR 97229-9998 U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS — OTHER rtvoginvuttorfaioticinst JUN -23 -0300 01 33 FROM TIGARD - TUALATIN SCH DIST TO 96847297 P.01 • • TIGARD - TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J 13137 SW PACIFIC HIGHWAY TIGARD, OR 97223 (503) 620 -1620. • FAX • (503) 684 -2232 - FACSIMILE TRANSM ISSION TO: • PA A+Rrc O — R-tS DEPARTMENT: FAX NO: TELEPHONE NO: . FROM: PLEASE NOTE: Total pages being sent: 2 include this page If you do not receive•all pages, or if there is a question, please call (503) 684- fps :• • • • JUN -23 -0300 01 35 FROM TIGARD- TUALATIN SCH DIST TO 961347297 P.01 • • Tigard - Tualatin • School District 23J . . Larry Hibbard Ad? tstrallort • ° 13137 S.W. Pacific Highway : • Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel. (503) 620 -162a Fax (503) fillt.2296 June •29,199S • • • • • RE: Durham Elementary School Expansion • Dear Interested Party: • Tigard - Tualatin SchoolPistrict 23J the owner of the property located at 8048 SW Shaffer Lane, Tigard, OR 97223 is considering proposing a site development review of the school expansion plans of this location. Prior to applying to the City of Tigard for the necessa +:permits, we would like to discuss the proposal in more • detail with surrounding.property owners and residents. You are invited to attend a • meeting on : • Tuesday, July 18,1995 • • • Durham Elementary School 8048 SW Shaffer Lane Tigard, OR 97223 7:00 PM • • Please notice this will be an informational meeting on preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to the submittal of the application of the _ .. • We look forward to more specifically discussing the proposal with you. Please call us at 684 -2211 if you have questions. • • Sincerely, • • • Geo a Fisher • Business Manager • • Our commitment is to educate every student to be a successful and r rponstble contributor in our changing world. • Please haue this read into the record of the meeting of October 23, 1 To the Hearings Officer Re: the approval of expansion plans for Durham Elementary The expansion of space is much needed by this community but also needed is to ensure the safety of children traveling to and from the facility. Durham Elementary needs to be expanded because of the increased and increasing population of the area. Increased population also means increased traffic congestion. There exists no safe crosswalk from the neighborhoods immediately north of the school grounds to the school. R traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Ave. and Durham Road would stop traffic to allow safe passage for students, it is necessary for the safety of the student population of Durham Elementary. In addition, should you decide to make the construction of a traffic signal a condition for approval, the city and school district would be able to use Traffic Impact Fee money ( from the school construction and other projects ) to help pay for the signal. Because funding is a critical issue for this project, TIF money could make a difference in the timing of construction, the prevention of a pedestrian - student involved accident I urge you to make your approval of the expansion of Durham Elementary contingent upon the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Ave. and Durham Road. Thank you, Val/. a/0 044,/j {�.. : iVEL; Sally Christensen 15685 SW 76th ;)s - , Tigard, OR 97224 JAN- 8 -96 MON 8:21 SELIG LEE RUEDA FAX NO. 5032244836 P. 01 • • SELIG 1 LEA I RUEDA Architects aid Piamen �6V0..... I.+ �W",••••• ••••� ^- ••'+a�nerWVY1sM0�+Mw.OiW PMY1VM. l '•hO4tN_MpK,9.o�iWW1.'sLW.rWJ� \.6MAP1VMn 2!) rav Ask SrMeg, Porr(aiid. Oregon 9120a Tet )son:.' (503) 224.0173 Fact Number. (S03) 2244836 F A X T R A N S M I T T A L Date: e " 6 A T 1 64 e To: C __ .................... — .... ¼-' --- ..,miong._I_.a ...r Attn: a.0am.11ar Nal.F.M 400•4rt4V. Pages, including this page. We are sending you: . Attached Under separate cover Dare Description �Iwrwliywwrwrruc..�./a. wwa+�wwwaul�all.auw .+ ww.Nwmm.n�luawap.u+wn.wmwo � wvc will -- ' ..... _ •ma0.4Rm4wml.10. a.waws Ii0VM0A�M'}�'� i — � 4 WmWbM k9Yti. *MAee1 9.1} W eil. pry '-'i c 7Mf�9. +¢� ✓�� +1.w'r'.nrW "..oz..atrut,..ammkrww~...0.41V J.aa,va a.w w..aao awYw R+l F..1 r.� ■n a s . m a r a n a t e . a w a a ■ •+,.1RM Wt.., .r.n.w_. mmawbmwl. tmn. 1101 nnwrw.w.1w aap;. wa4. W 1uau0 Remarks: Namasmammasvasmansorarmw cr a , c w. Mamoru Nam .. .. _ ..... __.... w.o..m., _., ..._... ,. wmveua. rnwaw. w�a_. w. s• w.....,. ro., r+ r...u.r..n�wr�m.muau.auaa....+r Inmx5 (1) JAN- 8 -96 MON 8:22 SELIG LEE RUEDA FAX NO. 5032244836 P.02 • DURHAM - ADDENDA NO. 2 - 20 OCTOBER 1995 SELIG/LEE/RUEDA L ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS 213 S.W. ASH, SUITE 201 PORTLAND, OR 97204 (503) 224-0173 ADDITIONS AT DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FOR TIGARD- TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT 23J This Addenda to the Contract Documents is issued to clarify and correct the Drawings and Specifications. This document is hereby made a part of the Contract Documents to the same extent as though it were originally included therein. Acknowledge receipt hereof by ieseiing the above Addenda number in the space provided in the Proposal Form prior to submitting bid. Failure to do so may subject bidder to disqualification. ? .._�p i N 2A- 1 SECTION 01015 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS Add: 1.5 SITE ACCESS The ?GE property located to the South and East of the school site (at South end of existing gravel road), may be used by the contractor for surging and for emu to the South side of existing building. Existing chain link fencing may be ti°mporairily reaaoved and replaced at project completion. Verify approval to remove existing trees on POE property with school district's project manager. 2A- 2 SECTION 08700, - DOOR AND HARDWARE SCHEDULE At Door D28B, under Size delete: - 810x6 /8' insert 11 8/0x8/0', 2A- 3 SECTION 09660- RESILIENT FLOORING - 2.6 - MATERIALS Add: Ij,!'..f', L FORBO Traction Step - Slip Resistant Sheet Vinyl. Install per manufacturer's instructions for damp and cold (to -5 degrees F) conditions. 2A- 4 SECTION 10200 - METAL LOUVERS - 2.0 PRODUCTS 2.1 MANUFACTURER Delete: 'TINA' Insert: 'FK 2A- S SECTION 10250 - BICYCLE RACKS - 2.1 BICYCLE 'S RACIS) At first line delete: ` I Units" insert "6 Units." 2A- 6 SECTION 10800 - TOILET ROOM ACCESSORIES - 2.6 SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER Add: "Location - one in each Girl's and Women's Toilet Rooms." PAGE 1 JAN- 8 -96 MON 8:22 SELIG LEE RUEDA FAX NO, 5032244836 P. 03 . • . • DURHAM - ADDENDA NO. 2 - 20 OCTOBER 199: • .. •� . . 2B• 1 SHEET 1.1 Drawing 48/1.1 Site Plan a. Delete New trash enclosure and cone, pad by gravel apron as shown on attached drawing b. Install New 4' conc. pad and S (five) bike racks around outside of curved walk at No East corner of parking lot as shown on attached drawing AD2.3. c. tea"t.>iebage'foi' Note'No. ' rise.tlJEsis. sax, driinpattlpirr tQ .main. Install New 6' chain link fence with sight obscuring slats around dam sides of the perimeter of the pad. Install two leaf chain link gate with sight obscuring slats on side open to parking lot," 2B• 2 SHEET 1.3 GRADING Add Planting Plan: At Detail 4811.3 Delete 'Extended Dry Detention Pond' shown at Southwest corner of site and replace with 'Water Quality Swale' as shown on Addenda Drawing AD2.I attached. 2B- 3 SHEET 1.4 srrE PLAN EXDD Add Swale Plan: At Detail 48/1.3 Delete "Extended Dry Detention Pond' shown at Southwest corner of site and replace with 'water Quality Swale" as shown on Addenda Drawing AD2.1 attached. 2B- 4 SHEET 2 -2 a. Drawing 66/2.2 In Room 'Conf, All' add elevation key pointing to the left wall keying to '56/12.1." b. Drawing 54/2.2 Floor Plan - Area 'A' Along Grid 'C' to either side of Grid '5', insert 4'- 0'x't' -2` Relit+ 1' -3' off of Grid '5', (Between Rooms A4 &Alt and A3 &A9). 2B- 5 SHEET 2.3 Drawing 3512,3 a. Change names of 'Conf.BB' and "Conf. B9' to 'CLRM.BS' and "C1,.RM.B9." b. Drawing 3512.3 Floor Plan - Area 'B' Along Grid '3' to either side of Grid 'G', insert 4'- 0'x3' -2` Retire located 1' -3' off of Grid 'G', (Between Rooms B3 & B9 and B4 & B8). 2B- 6 SHEET 2.4 Drawing 45/2.3 Floor Plan - Area 'C' At Room E3B Multi - Purpose South of Grid '13' and East of Grid 'C" Delete Nate 'Saw -cut & Remove exist, Conc. slab... etc.' And associated 12'xl l' -0' drawing of cut. ..) Existing floor will not be disturbed. PAGE 4 JAN- 8 -96 MON 8:23 SELIG LEE RUEDA FAX NO. 5032244836 P. 04 • S • I I r !- l'' EXIST I 1 CCNC, il �T WALK I I °' - ••- Ay I ` � � AL-klifi,e , . ,,,,, A, 1 . .,„, , - _ - las 1 tk ....1001rv s Iv a Elm PACKS Alklm% It ® i 0 . � j: PLAY TO CO .. I I �- --•UTIL.ITY '\. 4 f 1 1i/ MENT mo ° 1 I 1 r ms ; 4 1 4 ! I . °J I G PR PARTIAL SITE PLAN _ 2 . I' = 30' -m' ADDITITIONS AT DURHAM EIMI SCLt00L 9 23 Mir rriu ANIMA P. Ae+rw�w e /0e • r • mY r 1," Ged1 A T el • • AGREEMENT FOR ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND SITE PERMITS DURING LUBA APPEAL PERIOD DATED AS OF: November 7, 1995 BETWEEN: Tigard Tualatin School District #23J % George Fisher, Business Manager 13137 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR 97223 ( "Tigard- Tualatin School District ") AND: City of Tigard %William A. Monahan, City Administrator City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97223 ( "The City") RECITALS WHEREAS, Tigard - Tualatin School District #23J has received final land use approval from the City of Tigard for construction of an addition to Durham Elementary School in the City on the real property described in Exhibit "A: attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the appeal period to the Land Use Board of Appeals for the Conditional Use Permit and Historic Sites Review following the Director's Notice has not yet run out; and WHEREAS, the City believes that it retains permit authority for this project during the pendency of any such appeal; and WHEREAS, in the interest of promoting education, it is in the best interest of the City to allow Tigard - Tualatin School District #23J to receive grading and site permits for the construction of the approved project, with due regard for protection of the City's processes and interest, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties agrees as follows: SECTION 1. Upon receipt of a valid and complete application for grading and site permits for the Durham School addition project which was approved pursuant to Conditional Use Permit No. 95 -0006 and Historic Sites Review No. MIS 95 -0018 in the City of Tigard on the real property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and provided such application meets all of the City's requirements for grading and site permits, the City shall issue grading and site permits, subject to the conditions contained herein. Page #1 AGREEMENT FOR ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS DURING LUBA APPEAL PERIOD „ • • SECTION 2. Nothing in this agreement is intended to limit or remove the City's authority to impose any lawful conditions on the applied for grading and site development permit, including conditions imposed as a part of the land use approval described herein and any other applicable provisions of City code or law. SECTION 3. In consideration of the granting by the City of the above - described permits, Tigard - Tualatin School District #23J hereby agrees to indemnify and defend and hold the City and its employees harmless from and against losses and damages of any nature whatsoever, that the City may or shall at any time sustain or be put to by reason of the issuance of the permits described in this Agreement prior to the issuance of a final decision or applicable appeal period affirming the City's approval of the site development review application. (a) "Final decision affirming” means a final decision by the City, LUBA, the Oregon Court of Appeals or the Oregon Supreme Court affirming the City's initial decision, on remand or as a result of a new application. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit Tigard - Tualatin School District #23J's right in the event of remand or a reversal of this land use decision to seek renewed site development review approval from the City for the real property described in Exhibit "A: attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, except as otherwise limited by the City Code. SECTION 4. The indemnity obligation contained in this Agreement shall continue from the date hereof until the final decision or appeal period on all levels of appeal resulting from the issuance of permits described in this agreement. SECTION S. In the event the City's approval of the Detailed Plan Review application described herein is overturned on appeal, Tigard - Tualatin School District #23J agrees to restore any public property to the state in which it existed prior to the execution of the Agreement, and remove any and all improvements therefrom at its sole expense. The City shall not exercise its rights under this paragraph until such time as the City finally denies the Detailed Plan Review application. SECTION 6. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. SECTION 7. No modification or cancellation of the Agreement shall be made without the written consent of both parties. SECTION 8. Notices and demands under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed effective when deposited in the United States mail, first class postage prepaid, directed to the other party at the address set forth above or such other address as a party may indicate by written notice to the other. SECTION 9. This Agreement is the complete and final agreement between the parties hereto and supersedes and replaces all prior and contemporaneous oral and written agreements as to the subject matter of the Agreement. Page #2 AGREEMENT FOR ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS DURING LUBA APPEAL PERIOD . • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. TIGARD- TUALATIN SCHOOL DISTRICT #23J By: George F er Title: Busin - : Mana • - r Tig.. • - Tualatin School District #23J CITY OF TIGARD By: William A. Monahan Title: City Administrator Page #3 AGREEMENT FOR ISSUANCE OF GRADING AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS DURING LUBA APPEAL PERIOD • • CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER OF TIGARD OF TIGARD OCTOBER 23, 1995 - 7:00 P.M. OREGON 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD TIGARD, OR 97223 - - 1 anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign -in sheet(s). PUBLIC NOTICE: Assistive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Planning Commission meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the meeting. Please call (503) 639- 4171, Ext. 320 (voice) or (503) 684 -2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: ❖ Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and ❖ Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need(s) by 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above. (OVER FOR MEETING AGENDA ITEMS] TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER - 9/25/95 PAGE I OF 2 h:Vogin \ patty \agendho9.25 • • 9 CITY OF TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER OCTOBER 23, 1995 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PUBLIC HEARING 2.1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95 -0006 >DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION< A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. Civic uses such as elementary schools are also permitted within the R -12 zoning district subject to conditional use permit approval. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.82, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. 2.2 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (SDR) 95- 0017 /SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 95 -0011 SNYDER/RANDALL REALTY BONITA COURT APTS. 4 The applicant has requested approval of the following development applications: 1.) Site Development Review approval to construct a 5 building, 36 unit multi - family apartment complex; and 2.) Sensitive Lands Review to allow the construction of a storm drainage system within the 100- year floodplain and wetland area. LOCATION: 7775 SW Bonita Road (WCTM 2S1 12BA, tax lot 400). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached /detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Sections 18.54, 18.84, 18.92, 18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.116, 18.120, 18.150 and 18.164. Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 3.1.1, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. 3. OTHER BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD HEARINGS OFFICER - 9/25/95 PAGE 2 OF 2 h:\login \patty\agendho9.25 r • • CITY OF TIGARD AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING OREGON STATE OF OREGON ), County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say: That I am a Senior Office Assistant for The City of Tigard, Oregon. 1_ That I served NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR That I served NOTICE OF DECISION FOR: City of Tigard Planning Director Tigard Planning Commission A_ Tigard Hearings Officer Tigard City Council A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE/NOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER of which is attached, marked Exhibit "A ", was mailed to each named persons) at the addr s(s), shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B ", on the ca day of / 1995, and deposited in the United States Mail on the .:mow` day of 6QC /6- 1995, postage prepaid. — ■ tom: �s�� elf OlG� epared Notice Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the pm-. e o he � day of ,191c � OFFICIAL SEAL WF.- C, 's. NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON DIANE M JELDERK NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION N0. 1999 My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTE 07, FILE IjN�FO.: ®��[ ,�� 4 NAME(S): r A £tM. Pern t t 6M.tI C<ik�/ w0 I a,hsio' CASE NO.(S): (,C P 4 ' , TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE: `O/ 3 q5 Pe4& • • 4' CITY OF TIGARD OREGON PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1995 AT 7:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95 -0006 FILE TITLE: DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION APPLICANT: Tigard- Tualatin School District OWNER: Same 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 684 -2235 REQUEST D A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Sections 18.54, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, :;RITERIA: 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. LONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. Schools and related uses are also permitted subject to conditional use permit approval. SHE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF 3HAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE IGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 8.30. \SSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED 3ILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684- 3772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE . -IEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN NRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC 4 .EARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT 'RESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND :VRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HEARINGS OFFICER MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER .JP 95- 0006/MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION NOTICE OF 10/23/95 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING Mtt I IN(. I U 01::3 I AIN AUDI I IUNAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSO UBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO E APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 2. 1995 ANY PARTY IS ENTITLITO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE W'I HE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HEARINGS OFFICER WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND, PRECLUDES AN APPEAL AN APPEAL AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. CUP 95- 0006/MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION NOTICE OF 10/23/95 HEARING'S OFFICER PUBLIC HEARING 1 2S 112C C -01801 • 2S 113B0 -00400 BOWEN. RICHARD L AND TERESA CASTILE, JAMES W & AUDREY PO R,OX 94 7800 SW PETERS RD TUALATIN OR 97062 DURHAM OR 97224 2S11380 -00500 2S112CC -01900 CASTILE, JAMES W & AUDREY COTTER, EDWARD E AND 7800 SW PETERS RD VIOLA C DURHAM OR 97224 8065 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97223 2S113BA -00300 2S112CC -02000 DURKEE. RALPH 0 & MARY H GOBLE, MARION MARLIN CO TRUSTEES 8025 SW DURHAM RD 7910 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97224 2S1138A -00400 2S113BA -00200 HAMBACH, HAROLD C & MILDRED M METZGER, DAVID G/DIANNE S HAMBACH, MICHAEL V AND PO BOX 275 BROWN, LORENE ET AL SHERWOOD OR 97140 7735 SW DURHAM RD TIGARD OR 97224 2S112CC -05900 2S113BA -00500 NEWBERRY, MICHAEL H PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC C 15954 SW 81ST CT 121 SW SALMON ST TIGARD OR 97224 PORTLAND OR 97204 2S112CC -05800 2S112CC -06000 ROGERS, CYNTHIA R SAYLER, DEBORAH A 15932 SW 81ST CT 15976 SW 81ST CT TIGARD OR 97224 TIGARD OR 97224 2S113130.00300 2S1138A -00401 SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 23.J TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT 13137 SW PACIFIC HWY NO 23J TIGARD OR 97123 13157 SW PACIFIC HWY TIGARD OR 97223 2S 112CC -05700 VICKREY, L EDWARD 15910 SW 81ST CT TIGARD OR 97224 411 RECEIVED Tigard- Tualatin WO' 1 6 1995 School District 23x11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Larry Hibbard Administration Center 13137 S.W. Pacific Highway Tigard, Oregon 97223 Tel. (503) 620 -1620 Fax (503) 684 -2296 October 16, 1995 Bill Monahan City of Tigard, Manager 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97224 Dear Mr. Monahan, Thank you for sharing the current information on the proposed stop light on Durham Road. The light was requested by a group of citizens in the vicinity of Old Durham Center last year. Our board and the City Council discussed the issue at their joint meeting on March 7, 1995. At that time there appeared to be a consensus among Council Members and the Board to share the cost of the light if it was determined that it was needed. As part of the approval process on our expansion of Durham Elementary, a traffic study was done and it was found that the light is not warranted. However, we are willing to participate with the City in this project if our finances allow. Money for the light will have to come from our Bond funds which are paying for the expansion of Durham Elementary. We do not have additional resources in the General Fund to cover items of this size. Construction in the region has escalated bid costs to the point that we are becoming concerned about our ability to complete all of the items included within or proposal. As a result, I would like to qualify our support for the light on whether we receive bids on our projects that are close to estimates. Too high of a bid on the expansion of Durham would interfere with our ability to fund the projects as well as our ability to participate with the City on the light. Bids are scheduled to be opened on Durham Elementary on October 26. We will have a better idea at that time of our ability to contribute to the light. Thank you again for keeping us abreast of the situation. If you have any further questions please call 684 -2211. Sincerely Georg • Fis' • r Business Manager c Russ Joki Our commitment is to educate every student to be a successful and responsible contributor in our changing world. • Please haue this read into the record of meeting of October 23, 1 To the Hearings Officer Re: the approval of expansion plans for Durham Elementary The expansion of space is much needed by this community but also needed is to ensure the safety of children traveling to and from the facility. Durham Elementary needs to be expanded because of the increased and increasing population of the area. Increased population also means increased traffic congestion. There exists no safe crosswalk from the neighborhoods immediately north of the school grounds to the school. A traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Ave. and Durham Road would stop traffic to allow safe passage for students, it is necessary for the safety of the student population of Durham Elementary. In addition, should you decide to make the construction of a traffic signal a condition for approval, the city and school district would be able to use Traffic Impact Fee money ( from the school construction and other projects ) to help pay for the signal. Because funding is a critical issue for this project, TIF money could make a difference in the timing of construction, the prevention of a pedestrian- student involved accident I urge you to make your approval of the expansion of Durham Elementary contingent upon the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Ave. and Durham Road. Thank you, /l/ OZ1/ '(1/2' IiJ Sally Christensen 15685 SW 76th '. Tigard, OR 97224 cororm SEP -24 -0300 00:55 FROM TIGARD - TUALATIN SCH DIST TO 96847297 P.01 • • Tigard - Tualatin School District 13137 SW Pacific Hwy Tigard, OR 97223 (503)620 -1620 - Main Switchboard Number FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION This Fax was sent from: FAX # (503) 684 -2232 - Business Office FAX # (503) 684 -2296 - Administration Office DATE: /oli 9 FROM: Fox) /114-5o7..) PHONE # 6 84- ZZ 3 S TO: /\441,2 " /e3 s DEPARTMENT 1-A-iN1At4 FAX # C8 729 PHONE # C 39- 4/"7/ Total pages sent: 2 (includes this page) COMMENTS: ra "2 EJe*J C-1,1 CO,J 4 c'?oS I. Please haue this read into the record of ie meeting of October 23, 1995 To the Hearings Officer Re: the approval of expansion plans for Durham Elementary The expansion of space is much needed by this community but also needed is to ensure the safety of children traveljng to and from the facility. Durham Elementary needs to be expanded because of the increased and increasing population of the area. Increased population also means increased traffic congestion. There exists no safe crosswalk from the neighborhoods immediately north of the school grounds to the school. A traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Ave. and Durham Road would stop traffic to allow safe passage for students, it is necessary for the safety of the student population of Durham Elementary. In addition, should you decide to make the construction of a traffic signal a condition for approval, the city and school district would be able to use Traffic Impact Fee money ( from the school construction and other projects ) to help pay for the signal. Because funding is a critical issue for this project, TIF money could make a difference in the timing of construction, the prevention of a pedestrian- student involved accident I urge you to make your approval of the expansion of Durham Elementary contingent upon the construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of 79th Ave. and Durham Road. Thank you, 2 /( a/14 fini/U Sally Christensen 15685 SW 76th ,r - Tigard, OR 97224 • • .;14.).1.1 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE THE CITY OF TIGARD HEARING'S OFFICER, AT A MEETING ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1995 AT 6:00 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO: HISTORIC RESOURCES REVIEW (MIS) 95 -0018 FILE TITLE: DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION APPLICANT: Tigard - Tualatin School District OWNER: Same 13137 SW Pacific Highway Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 684 -2235 REQUEST > A historic site review to expand a newer portion of the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet. The site contains the original Durham Elementary School which is designated as a historic resource. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). APPLICABLE REVIEW Community Development Code Sections 18.82. CRITERIA: ZONE: Residential, 12 Units per acre (R -12). Historic District (HD). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. Schools and related uses are also permitted subject to conditional use permit approval. The HD overlay requires that prior to development of new structures that a review be conducted to address site development issues with respect to the existing historic community resource. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639 -4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684 -2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION NOTICE OF 11/6/95 HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMITTEEE PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT WRITTEN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOSED ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR A THE PUBLIC HEARING. ORAL TESL" CONY MAY BE PRESENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. A PUBLIC HEARING, THE HISTORI SOURCES COMMITTEE WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPOR PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER; OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING; AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMITTEE MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 17, 1995 ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMITTEE WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND, PRECLUDES AN APPEAL AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL BASED ON THAT CRITERION. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE -NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS PER PAGE. AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY -FIVE CENTS PER PAGE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE STAFF PLANNER MARK ROBERTS AT (503) 639 -4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON. MIS 95-0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION NOTICE OF 11/6/95 HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMITTEEE PUBLIC HEARING 10/13/95 08:49 $503 526 2538 TV FIRE MARSHAL eJ001 /002 - • 1 • • 1 CITY OF TIGARD OREGON c, REQUEST FOR COMMENTS SEP 2 9 19 95 FIRE MARSHA�. OFFict DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: Washington County Fire Marshall FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639.4171 Fax: (503) 664-7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95- 0005/HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW (MIS) 95 -0018 »DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION ( A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet.. A Historic District Review as the site is a historic district site. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single- family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.96, 18. 100, 18. 106, 18. 108, 18. 114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 9. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: I (Please provide the following intimation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: L L L Phone Number(s): '� - S0 F CUP 95.000G/MIS 95 -0oie DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PROPOSAtJREOUEST FOR COMMENTS • • . MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Mark Roberts October 9, 1995 FROM: Michael Anderson, Development Review Engineer RE: CUP 95- 0006 /MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION Description: The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of the expansion of the school structure located at the existing Durham Elementary School. The site is located easterly of SW Hall Boulevard and southerly of SW Durham Road with the address of #8048 SW Shaffer Lane. The parcel consists of Tax Lots 2S1 13BA 400 and 2S1 13B 300 with an area of 8,48 acres. FINDINGS: 1. TRAFFIC: The applicant has submitted a traffic report entitled "Transportation Analysis for Durham School Expansion ", dated August 30, 1995, as prepared by Associated Transportation Engineering & Planning (ATEP). The report includes traffic counts along SW Durham Road at the intersections of SW Hall Boulevard and SW 79th Avenue, together with estimates of the projected traffic generated by the school with the completed expansion. The report concludes that the increase of school traffic to 1995 traffic will not unduly affect either intersection. The report does not include traffic projections beyond 1995. In addition, the report indicates that traffic warrants to justify a traffic signal at SW Durham Road and SW 79th Avenue are not satisfied. This proposed signal has been the subject of local community discussion and has been recommended by the South Citizens Involvement Team (CIT). In particular, with the proposed construction of SW Durham Road as a part of the Washington County MSTIP program, it was the desire of the both the School District and the local community to include the traffic signal with the work scheduled for 1996. Although the traffic report does not make any recommendations for pedestrian improvements, it is the recommendation of the Engineering Department that the site plan be revised to include a 6 foot wide sidewalk across the school site from the proposed new building addition to the new sidewalk to be constructed in SW Durham Road. ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 95 -06 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PAGE 1 • • 2. STREETS: The site currently takes access from SW Shaffer Street, a local street located on the contiguous Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) property which connects to the southerly extension of SW Hall Boulevard known as SW 85th Avenue. The existing street has been improved and no changes are proposed. The new site plan shows the construction of the building addition only, utilizing the existing on -site parking lot improvements and the existing single driveway onto SW Shaffer Street. 3. SEWER: The existing school building is presently connected to the public sewer located on USA property and no changes are proposed. 4. STORM DRAIN: The site currently drains toward the contiguous USA property and an existing underground storm drain system upstream of the nearby Fanno Creek. The site plan does not propose any changes to the existing parking lot. However, the impervious area will be increased by the additional building coverage and the roof drainage should be directed to the existing underground storm drain system. In addition, the project should incorporate an on -site water quality facility as prescribed by the requirements of the Unified Sewerage Agency. The Unified Sewerage Agency has established and the City has agreed to enforce (Resolution and Order No. 91 -47) Surface Water Management Regulations requiring the construction of on -site water quality facilities or fees in -lieu of their construction. The applicant should re- design the site plan to include a water quality facility that would be maintained by the School District. Recommendations: PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED OR FINANCIALLY SECURED: 1. The applicant shall re- design the site plan to include a 6 foot wide sidewalk from the new building addition, adjacent to the existing parking lot, to connect the existing walk to the proposed sidewalk in SW Durham Road STAFF CONTACT: John Hagman, Engineering Department (639- 4171). 2. The applicant shall include an on -site water quality facility as a part of the final site plan and shall provide a drainage ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 95 -06 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PAGE 2 • report for approval of the Engineering Department. STAFF CONTACT: Greg Berry, Engineering Department (639 -4171) APPROVED: (/ Randall R. Wooley, ity Engineer n: \engineer \CUP95- 06.mja ENGINEERING COMMENTS CUP 95 -06 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PAGE 3 • MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD • TO: Randy October 7, 1995 . FROM: Michael ,,;1► SUBJECT: TIF for Durham Elementary School The TIF has been calculated three ways for your consideration: 1. The architect indicates that the expansion to provide for an expansion from 400 students to 600 -- from the manual, the fee is 200 x 1.03 x $66 = $13,596.00 2. Using the figures of the building area from the present 23,830 sft to 39,135 sft as shown on the site plan, the expansion will provide for 62.15 of the 600 populaton, and the fee is 62.15 x 600 x 1.03 x $66 = $25,349.74 3. Using the traffic report projections, the increase in the traffic is 218 and the fee is 218 x 1.03 x $66 = $14,819.64 There is no record of the previous building permits and no previous fees have been paid per the Building Departments investigation. MA \SCHOOLTIF.MEM A /9/ �1S' z 6el�e�e 741-4 � 4t/ /f / I2 Gorr ee 4, ea lculuJi.€, T /F. • • RECEIVED PLANNING Aur OF OCT 0 5 1995 CITY O EGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: Cathy Wheatley, City Recorder FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95- 0006/HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW (MIS) 95 -0018 >DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION< A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet.. A Historic District Review as the site is a historic district site. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.96, 18. 100, 18. 106, 18. 108, 18. 114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 9. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: g We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 95- 0006/MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • A CITY OF TIGARD OREGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS RECEIVED PLANNING OCT 0'4 1995 DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: Dave Scott, Building Official FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95- 0006/HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW (MIS) 95 -0018 >DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION( A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet.. A Historic District Review as the site is a historic district site. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 9, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEAS 'CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: V h► (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: I Phone Number(s): CUP 95- 0006/MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • 4 RECEIVED PLANNIr OF TIGARD (� OF O R E GON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS OCT 0'4.1995 DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: Michael Miller, Operations Water Department Manager FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95- 0006/HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW (MIS) 95 -0018 >DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION ( A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet.. A Historic District Review as the site is a historic district site. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 9, 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: J.JArF7t. /v/Er s . - - A i eo 73 R it/tigen. ( 77M E &JrA -I /N 5 - enveO a4 A- Z- Micid- N/ErER IJITLk 7P 6'kPAs lop1 A- /Kir.uM oP A- 3- AleAL- Pleitx . /5 AlEce554.4Y 771is /3 TIC 5Ame Size QC 1.1Q76 M - it. 7zwr 1...J4-5 AIQTF» 4u 71E t24J677 /AfA'L PI.,4A /3 771A -r /i cLUiEY) 7146 LCPMJ8 /D►'J. 71,6 gG kot, M571240 141u AIE D 73 PAy 771E Aka MEMO. /A/srsrUMiM/ Pius 7TH Dl rEa e-r: REniJ 7k/E sbe5 DF A' 2 -iwow 3 -JAvo - k4E7&Z 44 h► (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commenting: / I Phone Number(s): K MS CUP 95- 0006/MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ALA RECEIVED PLANNING' Y OF TIGARD O REGON REQUEST FOR COMMENTS SEP 2 9 1995 DATE: September 27, 1995 TO: Kellen Jennings, Tigard Police Department FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317) Phone: (503) 639 -4171 Fax: (503) 684 -7297 RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 95- 0006/HISTORIC DISTRICT REVIEW (MIS) 95 -0018 >DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION< A request for conditional use permit approval to expand the Durham Elementary School for a student capacity of 600 students. The total expansion is 39,135 square feet.. A Historic District Review as the site is a historic district site. LOCATION: 8048 SW Shaffer Lane (WCTM 2S1 13BA and 13B, tax lot 400 and 300). ZONE: R -12 (Residential, 12 Units per acre). The R -12 zone allows single - family attached/detached residential units, multiple - family residential units, residential care facilities, mobile home parks and subdivision, public support services, family day care, home occupation, temporary use, residential fuel tank, and accessory structures. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.54, 18.96, 18.100, 18.106, 18.108, 18.114, 18.116, 18.130, 18.150 and 18.164. Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and applicant's statement for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - October 9. 1995. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: k We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: 4 4 n ►► (Please provide the following information) Name of Person(s) Commentin a • ! v O • • % � /Vfl- I Phone Number(s): F • Jc CUP 95- 0006 /MIS 95 -0018 DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS 0 --bd-- 0-- CD 0 11 II 11 )- II i� II 4 �C / <11: 04 z 0_ 11) in • X11_ I liil 7 cy II 0/ 0 0 CV ii s — U — _II/ II 0 I ll 4 11 u • .% , it a 0 ,, / .7 ./ W. 0 IV T)<,0 E 0 1 -1 I cr) 4 II / IN,/ 4 / al cO ,,;;;;;;;,. al Alai 1111111 I IiSiuh iiiiilul1b r r mr ir- • Eg t I • TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ' DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION ' TIGARD, OREGON I I PREPARED FOR ' TIGARD SCHOOL DISTRICT ' TIGARD, OREGON N S i �. (</ 11,155 , - 1 � I• \ IQ� \- ON: Wit- OREGON <1'ziD L. E XF. 06/30/9& ' PREPARED BY ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING, (ATEP) 4040 DOUGLAS WAY LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 1 95 -666 August 30, 1995 r ' TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I REPORT METHODOLOGY 3 ASSUMPTIONS 3 ' INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS 3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PROCEDURE 4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 4 SCENARIO I - EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 ' EXISTING ROADWAYS 5 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATIONS 5 ' EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE 6 SCENARIO 2 - EXISTING + CURRENT LAND USES 12 t TRIP GENERATION 13 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 14 ' TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS 21 CONCLUSIONS 27 ' -I- 1 1 ' TABLES 1. Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) 9 I 2. Criteria for Signalized Intersections 10 3. Level of Service Definitions (Unsignalized Intersections) 11 4. Existing Levels of Service at Critical Intersections 12 5. Projected Trip Generation for Existing Land Uses 13 6. Scenario 2 Levels of Service at Critical Intersections 18 1 FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map 2 2. Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6 ' 3. Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 7 4. Scenario 2 - Site Generated Trips AM Peak Hour 14 5. Scenario 2 - Site Generated Trips PM Peak Hour 15 ' 6. Scenario 2 - Total Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour 16 7. Scenario 2 - Total Traffic Volumes PM Peak Hour 17 1 -III- ' 1 TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION I LOCATED IN ' TIGARD, OREGON INTRODUCTION This impact analysis has been conducted to identify and evaluate the ' existing and future traffic operational impact to the City of Tigard's transportation system of expanding the student population of the ' Durham Elementary School from 400 to 600 students. The Durham Elementary School is located on Shaffer Lane east of Hall Blvd., in Tigard, Oregon. (See Figure 1). The theme of this transportation analysis is to assess the transportation impacts from the proposed development on the surrounding street network based on two different scenarios: • First, the current conditions within the study area; • Second, the impact of development of the property with the proposed school expansion. 1 The format used in this report was established during meetings with City of Tigard Staff. ' Specific traffic related issues discussed in this report include: ' • Traffic analysis for the study area • Existing land use and traffic conditions in the project area • Proposed land use and future traffic conditions in the project area • Trip Generation estimates for the proposed school expansion. • Site access locations and operations ' • Safety considerations at the site access locations including, but not limited to sight distance analysis, turn lane and channelization. 1 DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 1 - August 30, 1995 NM OM MN MN MN NM 111111 IMMEMOINIMINNIMMI=MMNIN IMIN NIN NM r `�GT. �� 0 C.) ROSS RD / j p - _� I I I I — 1 f Q ■ < Q RD. < �♦ o _ 0 e t `` O (7) z Z LN <� S - , TICIARp r ry - KABLE ST. m _ P Pop. 23,335 ?J I - G DORBURN PL. z ASHFOR ST. SH _ r HAMLET ST. �yA,I- -ILE1-{ 1.) ti AVON G� T'D U - (S) > Q ��,� F CHURCH( ��� � ni N� a �` G - k B > w- v �� J Q Ili = AVON cp r y 1-- Q BOND ST. I r- w � N �I T < STRATFOR GT. � np 0 z I O LP. m DURHAM 4 `� v Q Q RD. NW - . r � , �� p Z U �� \ 4 TIGARD > � y �O � 0 )) ' � N 6 HIGH SGN. Q / r`/ 49.. ` ■ \ �< • ..e, J I D Q iti SHAFFER LANE FROST ST. SEWAGE c ¢ \ 1 > /� p rr TREATMENT "� Q TIGARD u j � �< 0 PLANT \ M.P. 1.85 Pop.23,335 Q �T �ry , co RO c,,,, O U U ST. O . 0 1 u .„‘r°\ \ Z ' EAST RD. U Q W Figures DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION 2 BRADBU Q 1 VICINITY MAF ATEF J DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANAL YSIS PAGE - 2 August 30, 1.9.95 ' REPORT METHODOLOGY his report was prepared using the latest land use and transportation data available from the City of Tigard (hereafter referred to as City), and the Oregon ' Department of Transportation (ODOT). Traffic counts supplied by ODOT indicated that the evening peak hour was from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. and the critical peak hour would be the a.m. peak hour due to the hours of operation of the Durham Elementary School. The operating characteristics at each of the key signalized and unsignalized intersections during the peak periods were examined using the methods outlined in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual utilizing the Oregon Department of Transportation Software Sicgcap. The operating characteristics examined included the volume to capacity (v /c) ratio, level of service, and ' estimated queue length. ' The criteria used for the intersection analysis included the guidelines set forth by the City of Tigard. These guidelines state that each signalized intersection analyzed should operate at a Level of Service (LOS) D with a volume to capacity (v /c) ratio of 0.90 or less (See tables 1 -4). ASSUMPTIONS Site Access Points The school is located on Shaffer Lane south of Durham Road and east of Hall Blvd., the access to the site will continue to be from Shaffer Lane. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS In order to analyze each intersection, there were certain common assumptions made. These ' assumptions, in general, are as follows: ' 1. Peak hour factors used based on existing traffic counts were 0.9 to 0.95 for the p.m. peak and 0.9 for the a.m. peak. ' 2. Truck percentages used in the analysis were based on the truck counts performed during turning movement counts 1 DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 3 - August 30, 1995 1 ' INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PROCEDURE The analysis of the key intersections included two different traffic scenarios for the p.m. peak I periods. These scenarios include: ' • Existing Conditions • Existing Conditions with the proposed development. :,SUMMARY .OF FINDINGS Based on the analysis found later in this report, the following findings are made: • The expansion of the Durham Elementary School can be accommodated and is shown by computer analysis to operate at a good level of service. ' • The intersections of Durham Road at Hall Blvd., currently operates at acceptable levels of service without the development and will continue to operate at acceptable levels of ' service after the proposed school expansion. ' • The intersection of Durham Road and 79th Avenue does not meet warrants for the installation of a traffic signal. ' SCENARIO EXISTING `:TRAFFIC.: 1 EXISTING ROADWAYS Hall Blvd is a major north /south link through the City of Tigard and is described as an arterial ' street in the Tigard Transportation Plan. It serves as the major route for access to Pacific Highway and Durham Road both from the north and the south and as the primary north /south roadway west of 1 -5. Hall Blvd in this area is constructed to a 2 -lane section with one through lane in each direction and left turn pockets at major intersections. ' Durham Road is a designated arterial street though this area connecting the residential areas DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 4 - August 30, 1995 north and south of Durham Road to the arterial streets system to the east and west. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND OPERATIONS Traffic counts taken at Durham Road and 79th Avenue were provided by ODOT and counts taken at Durham and Hall Blvd were provided by the Traffic Smithy. Since the peak hours of operation for the elementary school are usually during the morning peak hours, both the am and pm peak hours were evaluated. No adjustments to the volumes have been made to account for seasonal variations in traffic volumes. Figures 2 and 3 show the peak hour traffic volumes at the key intersections in the study area. LEVEL OF SERVICE The peak hour traffic operations, in terms of levels of service, at the key intersections in the study area were examined with procedures described in the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 2). Level of Service (LOS) is a concept that was developed to measure the amount of delay experienced by the driver and the conditions surrounding them as they travel through a signalized intersection or roadway segment. This delay includes such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impedances caused by other vehicles. As originally defined by the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual six grades are used to denote the various LOS; these grades are shown in Table 1. Using this definition, it is generally agreed that "D" LOS is the minimum acceptable for an urban area. For the purposes of this analysis, the assumed relationship between the calculated stopped time delay per vehicle and the associated LOS for signalized intersections is given in Table 2. Unsignalized intersections require a somewhat different approach to determine the capacity of the intersection. The 1994 Highway Capacity Manual offers the concept of " Total Delay per Vehicle" as the guideline for measuring the capacity. Total Delay per Vehicle is defined as " the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the YP P P end of the queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line; This includes the time required for the vehicle to travel from the last -in -queue position to the first -in -line position.. This determination is made after all approaches are analyzed and the LOS determined is usually that approach that typifies the "Worst Case" condition or worst Level of Service. A description of DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 5 - August 30, 1995 ME IIMI OEM .1.1 I=1 MN MI M 111111 ME IIII MO IIM MI 1.111 MN MO Mill 11.111 ROSS RD. / > ,0 1 I I I Q t - _ _ 0 `4� 2�� �.` 122 D I p LN. \,�` - Z co 6 ( 4-- 251 F-c �• , � 6' I '�► ^ /p° I - KABLE ST. ? � 4 I t r �_ I _ GP7 cYl `� m DORBURN PL. Ji ASNFOR ST. K�LE L I� UU U � S up zuj CHUR ei °§. Q [WAY Y F �7 1-1 :1 [ 3 I- BOND LLL ST. �_ w A) 1 D STRATFO CT. �j1-: 0 W LP. I m I I DURHAM �� U 1-IWY.r V A/ "NI /* , ll 2 5 TIG Ln Q HIGH SGH. Q :#i*, /-5' 111 1, ''' . ■/ 11111 Ln A 9 ___JE v._ e-, 4 ui SEWAGE ' , > �� K i Q Im�l1001 -4 -- -4 -- 412 TREATMENT I- O PLANT M.P. 1.85 CZI 0 0 0 .A0 iiiigio .. . I \ U DURI -IAM SCHOOL EXPANSION Q v Figure 2 EXISTING TfRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PEAK HOU1R ( DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE - 6 August 30, 1995 MI 1.111 111111 NM MI NM IMI ME MOM 1.111 OM Mill IIIIII 1111.1 1111111 M ME NM 1.1. / N 0 I ROSS RD. J Q j I I I I c� $ Q 11ro .� + � — 218 i p L. ��� r z F 422 189 D F-C' �s c. Q �- �� y am - KABLE ST. , tr = � ( I - 4 (.7 r _I ASHFOR ST. KALE L �' c{l DORBURN FL. -I Z� UU _ \\ % : - I Q1 =ul CHURCHILL 0 _ 4 Q D < :5> - I WA Y L ------- � F � 1 3 F- a0 \ AND 1 1 ST. I > EYJ Al I D STRATFO CT. U I 0" - O \ LP. I Im I I DURHAM I- z iii • v Q � I� 4� C?U �F,\, U T IGARD > / F - " HIGH SCH. Q ' r� / '''<. �� i t- Q 5I- 4AFFER LANE 22_0 ) C. / 44 ii; 10 �/ TR T ,_ � -4-1031 i- O PLAN-Le5 � O O O O _.4.40 U 0 DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION e Figure 3 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES FM FHA< HOUR N.- ( ATEF DURHAN SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE - 7 August 30, 1995 ' the levels of service relating to the Total Delay per Vehicle is shown in Tables 3 & 4. Past experience with the unsignalized analysis procedure indicates that this methodology is very conservative in that it tends to overestimate the magnitude of any potential problems that might exist. Therefore, the results of any unsignalized intersection analysis should be reviewed with this thought in mind. Within the City of Tigard, LOS D is considered to be the minimum acceptable ' standard for an unsignalized intersection. LOS analyses presented in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures described above. For each intersection, these analyses estimate the overall intersection LOS ' during the peak hour flow. t 1 DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 8 - August 30, 1995 1 Table 1 - Level Of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) Level of Service Traffic Flow Characteristics t A Very low delay, less than 5.0 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression t extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles • not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. ' B Average delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle.. This generally occurs wi good progression and /or short cycle_ lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, Causi higher levels of average delay. C Average delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays m. result from fair progression and /or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may beg ' to .appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping: is significant at this level, althou• may still pass through the intersection without stopping ' D Average delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. At LOS D, the influen. of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combinati • of unfavorable progression, longer cycle lengths,. or high. v/c rations. Many vehicles, sto. ' and the proportion. of vehicles not stopping declines: ': Individual cycle failures are noticeabl: Frequent signal cycle failures and associated congestion. . Average delay in the range of 40.1 to 60. seconds per vehicles This is, considered to be t limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, lo cycle lengths, and high v /c. ratios. Individual: cycle failures are frequent occurrences. ' E : Forced flow a with average delay in excess of 60.0 seconds per vehicle:: This is consider= 9 y P . . to be unacceptable to most drivers:. This condition often occurs. with over saturation, i.= when arrival: flows rates exceed the capacity of.the intersection. It may also occur at his v/c ratios below 1.00 with: may individual cycle: failures:. .Poor progression and long cyc lengths: may also be major contributing causes .to such: delay: levels. • Note: A signal:: cycle failure is considered to occur when one or more vehicles are forc= to wait through more than: one green signal indication. for a particular approach. Source Transportation Research Board:. "Highway Capacity Manual", Special'. Report . 209 (198 1 1. DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 9 - August 30, 1995 1 Table 2 - Criteria For Signalized Intersections Stopped LOS. delay per ' vehicle (seconds) A .00 -5.00: ' B 5.1.:- 15.0':. C 15.1::- .25.0 I D 25.1- : ;40.0.: .. E .. :40:1 ° - 60.0 F`: • >600 Source: Transportation- Research: Board. "Highway Capacity ..Manual ", Special' Report 209 (1985): 1 DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 10 - August 30, 1.995 1 Table 3 - Level Of Service Definitions (Unsignalized Intersections) I . ' Level of Service Traffic Flow Characteristics t A Average: delay per vehicle. between. 0 and 5 seconds .. Free- flowing with no congestion. Very. few vehicles waiting in a. queue. ' B Average delay per vehicle between 5 and 10 seconds. Slight delay to vehicles_ little or .no vehicles. in. queue: ' C Average delay per. vehicle 10 to 20 seconds.. Occasional delay and congestions, more than one vehicle in queue. D Average delay per vehicle 20 to 30 seconds'. Frequent delay and congestion, more than one vehicle per queue: E �, ' : Average delay per vehicle in excess'of ::30' to 45 seconds. Thi5 condition exists when the demand is near or equal : to the capacity of the intersection or movement:. Unstable flow which . , almost continuous vehicles in the queue:: F Queue. iflow, with ns ve a verage delay: per vehicle in. excess of 45 seconds. Source::.' Transportation Research Board: :. "Highway °Capacity: Manual ", Special Report DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 11 - August 30, 1995 Table 5 - Leve of Service for 1995 without Durham School Expansion I U In t er section AM PEAK HOUR: PM PEAK:. LOS DELAY V/C LOS: :. Delay V/C '� i , R at o: Ratio I Durham Road at Hall Blvd D 32.7 0.86 D 27.5 0.82 Durham Road at 79th Avenue D 28.9 E 31.8 Table 5 indicates that the intersections within the study boundary currently y ry c ently operate at acceptable levels of service during peak hours. SCEN.4R /0 - EX /STING. VV/EXPANSION I Scenario two includes the expansion of the student population from 400 to 600 students: (refer to Table 6 ) I TRIP GENERATION I Estimates of total daily a.m. and p.m. peak hour driveway volumes for the existing uses were developed from empirical observations at many similar -sized facilities located throughout the United I States. These empirical observations are summarized in a standard reference manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and are supported by additional independent studies I conducted by both the California Department of Transportation and the Arizona Department of Transportation. I Estimating the number of vehicle trip ends that will be generated by the proposed development is of prime importance in order to accurately assess the impacts of development on the road network. I Two basic procedures are available to traffic engineers for estimating the number of driveway vehicle trips generated by a proposed but not yet existing development: 1. Apply averages observed through field studies conducted at other similar facilities located I throughout the United States. A number of sources are available for this information including Trip Generation Manual (5th Edition) 1994, which is published by the Institute of Transportation I Engineers (ITE); and summary trip generation reports prepared by the California Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, and other public transportation agencies. I DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 12 - August 30, 1995 I All of these sources provide excellent guidance in estimating the trip generation rates for various land uses, but obviously do not take into account the effects of local conditions and unique I characteristics of the proposed land use. 2. Observe through field studies the actual trip generation characteristics of other similar and 1 existing developments within the local area. 1 Procedure one above was used in the development of this report. Table 6 shows the expected number of vehicle trip ends to be generated by the proposed development on a daily a.m. and p.m. I peak hour basis based on the mathematical regression equations developed based on trip generation rates at similar sites throughout the United States and found in Section 520 of the Trip I Generation Manual (5th Edition), Based on information provided by the Tigard School District, approximately 66 percent of the I students attending this school will be transported by school bus. The number of trips shown in Table 6 are the total number of trips generated including busses. I Table 6 - Trip Generation For The Durham School Expansion. I Land Use Size Daily ` AM Peak Hour , PM Peak Hour Volumes Volumes. „ : Volumes ' Total:.:;' In.:. ; .s:. :;, In ' Out Existing School 400 436 120 72 48 6 3 3 I Expanded School 600 654 180 108 72 9 5 4 ' Total additional 218 60 36 24 3 2 1 trips I TRIP DISTRIBUTION II The distribution of generated trips onto the roadway system within the site area is based on the existing study area distributions. This distribution was determined by field observation and review of the existing traffic movements within the study area. Figures 4 and 5 show the estimated site - generated traffic distributed to the surrounding road system. The site - generated traffic shown in Figures 4 and 5 was combined with the existing traffic volumes shown in Figures 2 and 3 to arrive at the total traffic for the Durham Elementary School I Expansion. Total traffic volumes are shown in Figures 6 and 7. DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 13 - A U CHOOL EXP August 30, 1995 I 1.111 11.1 NM 111111 OM ' I M M NM MN MI MO I NM MIMI MB NM I / 0 I / ROSS RD. / 4 — — / P 4 I I I i i _ O 4 iF _ Z LN. 4 i, . = D O ff- 4 ,\x, 0 ' l I �► q �-- 13 r � — KABLE ST. 01\ '''' \ lir _ GP DORBURN PL. _1 ASHFOR ST. KALE L zl 4 00 1 [ _ z ~ u Q' CS u co z w CHURCHILL D < 0 > (------- WAY v Ih ��� � p T al Q r lu _I L------- L_D ST. J F , 3 I I lLl `' A:I j I STRATFO' o CT. N J l I z I �� z IIIJJJ I / 'V 17 ) 0 _ fY 1 _1 �� LP. I 1 DURHAM U J RD. Hwy V ". / 2 Q � T Ili � � ' r �/�_ `kt, . 4ti U TIGARD > HIGH SCH. Q ", �/ l 'Sr/ ` '''< V♦� 4 SHAFFER LANE ) 2 / lii SEWAGE f Q Il TREATMENT ¢ I2 = F- O PLANT M.P. 1.85 Ln 03 0 0 1 0 I U U DURI-IA ' SCHOOL I XFANS I ON 4 4 Fi4ure SITI G N RATED TRA °°IC VOLU'LS • AM FEAK I LOUR AT F) DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE - 14 August 30, 1995 M 11111 I M MI MN 1.11 11111 111.1 111111 ME M 111111 11111111 11111 NM ... 11111111 111111 / — I ROSS RD. / , > Q > / _ t I I I I - 1 a O <,7„., eRNI Z 4 &' _ v p LN. I ��.�, r f-c- 4\( I o ki P / i i - KA BLE ST. � (y \ )t( I _ — @ _j ASHFOR ST. KABLE LNN DORBURN PL. Z� • 0 1 Z i � � cu Z ii i CCHILL D Q -- U1A Y r G � � i t-- BON_ - D ST. I F m — de \ -- c w j i I D I STRATFO' �� GT. � U U I- - z LP. m DURHAM S 9 0 U r NUJ1 !` ^ (i TIGARD > U HIGH SCH. Q ~ / SHAFFER LANE .41 w SEWAGE 4 0 y 4- 1 TREATMENT �' co U PLANT M.P. -Las O O O .. O o • --6' u U DURNAM SCI -100L EX'- -) l\ISI0I \I Q Figures 5 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Fr' FE A< =OU' A T 1 F -J DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE - 15 August 31, 1995 I NE NM MI N EN an in OM MI UM MI In NM j I ROSS RD. j ui / / d� Q aP Q t = i i I i - 2(0 (0� + 12 = H Z LN. ' \ z :,,,,,,, (��(o -•-- 251 1--C , \ \' — 2�j" A' 13 — K^_BLE ST. GP . P j� � t( I KALE L l Q DORBURN FL. ASHFOR ST. / 0 1 jaUtili ~ rr , ?i L A @ CHURCHILL • U� o F �� 1r1"i D r- '---- -------- WAY ��� � �BO_ND ST. I ; A D STRATFO• o CT. U \ O we O Z LP. I Im I I D DURHAM I P l J pJ O . Q RD. HWY.� / � 4 2 _ ----- TIGARD > w ; HIGH 5C1-I. 4 /.C/ ` '� �. � ' In Q J 1- (L SNAPPER LANE A I I �... , Li SEWAGE �¢' 1 Q ions —. 4— 423 1 TREATMENT a! O PLANT M.P. 1.85 0 O O o • 1 I 0 U NT DUiNA SCHOOL EXPANSION °- Figure TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMFS A' PEA< I IOU / ( . • ATE=) DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE - 16 August 31, 1995 ROSS RD. j Q W `/ I I I I ` 0 (NI / Q • Q _ - • 116 .� ) + C — 21S r Z LN. 4�� _ z \,,,,._, 422 --0- • X89 r oc ��`'(; • - \K4LE ST. , 2D K: � �' m DORBURN L. -I ASHFOR ST. Uv t z I PJY P ui CHURCHILL (J� ¢� 1>t D 0 § Q �-- f WAY V -- ,q-.:\ I- F BD ON ST, I <-, w \� Ai 1 D STRATFO''t. CT, - U ' J 0 p —� p z LP. l m Jr 9 DURHAM I i - / � U RD. Ili HLUY � �o 2 � Q \ _-- -. 0 �/II / �` . TIGARD > / - HIGH $GI-I. Q Sj/ % O r Q •O � \ f I. SHAFFER LANE 9 7 _A ) IOC, SEWAGE 1 Q 05 .— I032 TREATMENT / � > H O PLAN7 1.b5 tk • L U U 7 DUIRI 1AM SCHOOL EXPANSION Q \-7- Figure TOTAL TRAFFIC VOL U E S 1 ■.. / ( AT>= F f DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE - 17 August 31, 1995 Table 6 - Level of Service for 1995 with Durham School Expansion rsectiotl ' >' ' ;:: ' >' .:<> 'A . ' M P EAK : HQ UR PM PEAK:HO.UR ...: R ilii':'> ii "Sk <`'3 »'5f2' >3' >rt`Sj " .'� > <: atio Durham Road at Hall Blvd C 18.7 0.77 C 22.6 0.86 Durham Road at 79th Avenue D 28.9 E 31.8 ' Table 6 indicates that the proposed expansion of the Durham Elementary School will not impact the surrounding street system. As part of this analysis, the existing intersection of Durham Road and 79th Avenue was investigated for traffic signal warrants. The eleven approved traffic signal warrants as described by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Page 4C -3, were used to evaluate the intersection for signal warrants. ' The intersection currently does not meet any of the eleven approved traffic signal warrants for the installation of a traffic signal. See attached warrant analysis. ......................... .....................:..:...... .. ..... ...... ............ ............................... .. ...... ..... ............. ............................... ... ..... ...... ............. ............................... CONCLUSIONS 1. The expansion of the Durham Elementary School from 400 students to 600 students can be accommodated without changes in the current level of service at the surrounding intersections. 111 2. The intersection of Durham Road and 79th Avenue does not meet warrants for the installation of a traffic signal. DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PAGE 18 - August 31, 1995 1 EZ � SOCIA TED 1 ' A NSPORTATION 1 GINEERING & � �_ Ir ANNING (ATEP) I 1 1 1 APPENDIX • I ATEP TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT COMPARISON L ATE 8/30/95 Intersection: Durham Road at 79th Avenue L urly Volumes on Major Street - 7 -8 am 8 -9 am 11 -12 am 12 -1 pm 1 -2 pm 3-4 pm 4 -5 pm 5 -6 pm Any 8 Hours. (Total of Both 1450 1222 1174 1287 1138 1420 1674 1826 !preaches) Hourly Minor Street Volumes - " 65 55 20 32 29 28 33 37 I me 8 Hrs. (Highest Hourly lumes From Either Approach) urly Pedestrian Volumes Across 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ajor Street- Same 8 Hour (Highest Volume Crosswalk) I Date of Traffic Counts 6/14/95 I Warrants Minimum Volume Number of Hours Warrant Warrant is Met (8 Required) Accident Experience: #6 Preventable Accidents 1 2 Month Period Minimum Warrant 5 0 • Minimum Vehicular Volume #1 Major Street 500 8 I Minor Street 150 0 3. Interruption of Continuous Traffic: #2 I Major Street 750 8 Minor Street 75 0 I Combination of Warrants (At least 2 of arrants 1,2, or 3 are met using 80% of their values): I Warrant No. 1 Major Street 400 8 Minor Street 120 0 I Warrant No. 2 Major Street 600 8 Minor Street 60 1 I Warrant No. 3 Vehicular Volume 500 8 Pedestrian Volume 190 0 I Page 1 I ATEP TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT COMPARISON I 5. Systems Warrant (If Applicable): I • Entering Volume (Weekday Peak Hour) 1863 N/A I Minimum Warrant 1000 6. Four - Hour Volume: (Attached Graph) I 7. Peak Hour Delay (Any four consecutive 15- minute periods.): Total Delay on Minor Street. .29 hrs 0 I 1. Minimum Warrant 5 hrs I 2. Volume on Minor Street ( One Direction Only) 37 0 Minimum Warrant 100 I 3. Total Entering Volume 1863 8 Minimum Warrant 650 8. Peak Hour Volume: (See Attached Graph) I I XXXX Standard Warrants Used. 70 percent of standard warrants used due to 85th percentile I speed in excess of 40 MPH or isolated community with population less than 10,000. I I I I I I Page 2 • 1 MN NM MI 1 11111 OM OM MI 1 1 1 NM NM • MI I MI 8/10/95 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF,TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT PAct 1 ACCIDENT SUMMARIES BY YEAR TIGARD HIGHWAY 141, BEAVERTON - TUALATIN WASHINGTON DURHAM RD AT 79TH AVE. 01/01/90 TO 12/31/94 NON- PROP. FATAL FATAL DAMAGE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE DRY WET INTER- OFF - YEAR COLLISION TYPE ACDTS ACDTS ONLY ACDTS KILLED INJURED TRUCKS SURF SURF DAY DARK SECTION ROAD 1990 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 3 4 1 2 2 4 4 YEAR TOTAL 1 3 4 1 2 2 L 4 1991 REAR -END 1 i 2 3 2 1991 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2 2 2 2 2 YEAR TOTAL 1 3 4 3 3 4 4 1992 REAR -END 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 1992 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2 2 2 2 2 YEAR TOTAL 3 2 5 3 4 1 3 2 5 1993 REAR -END 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 YEAR TOTAL 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 3 1994 REAR -END 2 2 2 2 2 2 1994 TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 1 1 1 1 YEAR TOTAL 2 1 3 2 3 3 3 FINAL TOTALS 9 10 19 12 14 5 17 2 19 REPORT EZSUMS1 • as EN FIGURE 4 -5. PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT a. - 600 2 OR MORE LANES Et 2 OR MORE LANES i- 0 500 I I I I I I I III Q 2 OR MORE LANES Et 1 LANE I-- cc 400 cn ' 1 LANE Et 1 LANE < \ ` _ ► -\ 0 w 30 0 �` z , 2 D 200 M_ 0 =MIN > 100 3-, 1926 � 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 MAJOR STREET — TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VPH *NOTE: 150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. VI I .a • . •1!J 1•! •UU / V /V Vv VLVi a1L V11 Va\ J. ..M, Y�•1• I . . V 14 HOUR MANILAL C k COUNT 1 SW DURHAM ROAD AT 541 79th AVE. DREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Site Code : 00000695 14 HOUR MANUAL CLASSIFICATION REGION 1, TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Start Date: 06/14/55 WEATHER:CLOW -RAIN SHOWERS 1995 File :,0. : DURHAR)0 MARY COUNTER # 784 Page : 1 CARS & PICKUPS, SMALL TRUCKS, LARGE TRU I I I From North Fran East Fran South � ( Fran West Fada Per � Pect 41r.6er Right Thru Left 3ther Right Thru Left 1 athlr Right Thru Left =law Right Thru Left ! Total Date 06/14/95 I 06:00 0 0 0 6 � 1 1 34 0( 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 94 0 136 06:15 0 0 0 8( 0 0 42 0 1 0 0 0 0 j 0 0 131 0 181 I 06:30 0 2 0 13 1 0 0 55 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 199 3 272 06:45 0 2 0 18 . 1 0 4 71 ili 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 215 O 1 312 Hr Total 0 4 0 45 ( 1 5 202 0 1 0 D 0 0 2 0 639 3 901 I 07:00 1 2 0 16 ( 0 1 61 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 226 2 311 07:15 0 6 D 11 I 2 109 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 17 239 3 388 07:30 3 6 0 15 1 0 2 113 0 1 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 271 2 412 07.4 0 1 0 6 0 1 129 0 0 265 2 ' Hr Ttal 4 15 0 50 ( 2 : 0 : 0 : 3 ! 08:00 6 0 13 ( . 0 0( 0 0 219 3 355 08:15 0 9 0 8 1 0 2 85 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 210 3 323 08:30 0 12 0 8 1 2 4 120 0 1 0 0 0 0( 0 0 163 6 315 08:45 0 • 1 0 & I 0 3 115 0 1 0 00 0 1 0 0 165 2 294 Hr Total 0 28 0 37 2 13 430 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 757 14 1287 j.. 1 09:00 0 2 0 12 ( 0 4 92 0 1 0 0 0 O 1 D 0 124 4 238 09:15 0 3 0 9 1 0 0 96 Of 0 0 0 Of 0 0 112 3 223 I 09:30 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 85 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 146 4 239 09:45 0 5 0 2 0 3 124 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 123 Hr Total 1 10 0 26 1 0 7 397 0 I 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 505 12 959 I 10:00 0 2 0 T 1 1 6 108 O 1 0 0 0 Of 0 0 120 3 247 10:15 0 1 0 4 1 0 5 104 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 124 6 244 10 :30 0 0 0 D 1 0 D 0 Of 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 10:45 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0J 0 I Hr Total 0 3 0 11 1 1 11 212 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 246 9 493 11:00 0 4 0 4 1 0 4 136 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 130 0 279 I 11:15 0 1 0 4( 0 3 134 0 1 0 0 0 Of 0 0 159 2 303 11 :30 0 0 0 2 1 a 7 152 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 149 1 311 11:45 0 1 0 4 ! 7 139 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 5 I Hr Total D 6 D 14 1 D 21 561 0 1 0 D 0 0 1 1 0 583 8 1194 ✓ 12 :00 0 2 0 3 f 1 6 156 D 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 131 5 304 12:15 0 4 0 9 t 0 10 167 Of 0 0 0 Of 0 0 175 3 368 I 12 :30 0 2 0 6 1 0 9 146 0 1 D 0 0 0 1 0 0 164 5 332 12:45 0 4 o 3 0 7 159 If 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 138 4 1 316 it Total 0 12 0 21 1 1 32 628 1 1 0 O 0 0 1 O • 0 608 17 1320 Post -it• Fax Note 7671 Paw 7— 7 A * ges ► I /A. 2 ora . J[l RIZZIMMATI I Phone 3—A7-304 p Pho[1O # 75J—L1 ` ] Fax ti .32 -81C7- 3011 F" i ,rz S9 V7: 111Oa la.JV �aUJf 4.1.4....J0 VU 1t U1 - LVA Vi1 1 yJ+VU�!VVv II _ ' 14 HOUR MANUAL CLASSIFICATION COUNT 1 SW DURHAM ROAD AT SW 79th AVE. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Sita Code • 00000695 14 HOUR MANUAL CLASSIFICATION REGION 1, TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Start Date: 06/14/95 WEATHER :CLOUD -RAIN SHOVERS 1995 File 1.0. : DURNAH }0 MARY COUNTER 11 784 Page : 2 II CARS & PICKUPS. SMALL TRUCKS, LARGE TRU • I 1 1 I From North IFram East 'From South 'From Nest Other Right Thru Left 1 Other Right Thru Left I Other Right Thru Left Other Right Thry Left 1 Total Date 06/14/95 - -- II 13:00 0 0 0 3 1 0 92 55 0 I 0 0 0 0( 0 0 91 0 1 241 13 :15 0 2 0 9 1 0 126 20 0 1 0 0 0 O I 0 0 154 1 1 312 II 13 :30 0 3 0 9 1 0 9 129 0( 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 149 5 J 308 13 :45 0 3 0 0 1 0 4 125 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 165 3 1 500 Hr Total 0 8 0 21 1 0 231 ' 329 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 559 9 1 116J L. I 14 :00 0 2 0 5 1 0 1 117 O 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 121 3 J 249 14:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 142 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 132 2 I 281 14:30 0 5 0 3 1 0 4 156 a I 0 0 0 0( 0 0 128 2 1 303 14 :45 0 4 0 6 1 0 6 149 0 1 _ 0 0 0 0 I 4 0 137 3 1 309 I Hr Total 0 12 0 19 1 0 14 564 a 1 0 0 a 0 5 0 518 10 ( 1142 15:00 0 4 0 3 1 0 13 . 187 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 12 1 358 II 15 :15 O 1 0 5 1 0 8 195 Of 0 0 0 0 2 2 149 6 1 368 15:30 0 2 0 4 1 0 10 161 •0 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 155 3 1 340 15:45 0 2 0 7 1 1 10 189 0 a 0 0 0 1 1 0 171 1 I 382 Hr Total 0 9 0 19 1 1 41 732 0 I 0 0 0 0 8 2 614 22 1 7448 I 16 :00 0 2 0 6 1 1 17 216 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 183 4 I 430 I 16:15 O 3 0 8 1 0 17 212 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 4 1 406 16:30 0 • 3 0 4 1 3 16 224 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 4 1 421 I 16:45 O _ 0 0 T 0 15 243 0 0 0 • 0 2 0 181 2 450 Hr Total 0 8 0 25 1 4 65 895 0 1 0 0 a a 3 0 693 14 ( 1707 / 17 :00 0 3 0 3 1 0 28 254 0 1 0 0 0 a 0 0 171 8 I 467 I 17:15 0 3 0 2 1 1 30 282 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 167 3 1 492 17 :30 0 7 0 4 1 1 26 255 0 J O 0 0 a 0 0 169 4 1 466 17:45 0 7 0 3 24 0 0 0 0 0 144 7 438 I 1 Hr Total 0 20 0 17 1 5 106 1031 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 656 22 I 1863 18:00 0 9 0 7 1 0 24 239 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 9 1 429 18:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 a 1 o a 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 II 18 :30 0 0 o 01 0 0 a 01 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 :45 0 4 0 4 I 1 12 112 0 1 0 0 0. 0 0 0 126 3 i 262 Hr Total 0 13 0 11 1 1 36 355 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 268 12 1 -696 I 19 :00 0 2 0 5 1 1 14 150 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 117 5 1 295 19:15 0 2 0 4 1 0 8 106 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 80 5 ( 206 19:30 0 4 0 1 1 0 14 123 D 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 74 2 1 219 1 19:45 a 8 0 4.1 1 13 120 0 1 O 0 0 Q I 0 D 79 3 1 228 Mr Total 0 16 0 14 1 2 49 499 ' 0 J 0 0 0 0 2 1 350 15 I 948 I • I II V l: 11 : OJ 14.4V uvU0 f 010,...,0 UUU1 — IN.L0alU 1 '1 VUOl V Vv I 4 14 HOUR WWUAL CLASSIFICATION COUNT SW DURHAM ROAD AT SW 79th AVE. I OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Site Code 00000695 14 HOUR NU►NUAL CLASSIFICATION REGION 1, TRAFFIC OPERATIONS Start Date: 06/14/95 UEATHFR:CLOUb -RAIN SHOWERS 1995 File I.D. : DURHAM}O MARY COUNTER # 784 Page 3 CARS & PICKUPS. SMALL TRUCKS, LARGE TRU ( From North From East IFram South (Fran West ( Other Right Thru Left 1 Other Right Thru Left ( Other Right Thru Left ( Other Right Thru left ( Total Date 06/14/95 - 1 "TOTAL" 5 164 0 330 1 19 637 7247 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 27 31 7997 176 1 16634 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 _ • I . I , . . , .---- -47.- ••• --- ' - ''''' 7.- "rlt..••';:;7 -: -37.7..: • 15 OT z :-,..5,,..,I.;; A ,.;..,....,1,-,,4.3,5i:-,..m,,,,,,,,,:,:22,.:.,:,,,ik,.,,,;,,, ,,, I ,..1:4:, * .:-; ' - ' 1;. . ,°,1--- tt; , t .t.t yk -- vrt;ricrks ,,0 ", ,, v;v 7 Ait? , ..f..:. - Ave"-iii: , * -,,,,, ‘m. ,, ...„ , i.):, ,,, ,, , i. , :ii.,:::;p1-.:(::::;*..3...5A 4 N.-.,• : . 4•;5•;•:t 4 .:::;:; . .:' , 4 7 :1: ,. ri:Ti:iii',.!:.434r;litil. ; , $.• , ,....4. , .1: - .f.g..4.,;.; , A•liAii;:! , ,2':.......,,.,„:........, ,... I frl'il,:c.. , ,,,.. 4 ,........,,, , ,,....:N. - ,-,...,, , ,,••5.,.._.....,.,:,.*...,,...a......„,,,,.,,,,_....s.,. , ,:.... , ,...,,,.....,.{_,„ :7 ,,.,, ::::,..... , r i WP'ATI :: ,•-;' ..,...: : ', -45s. I.Trt:W.!:'','W.: =1 t.1% .11iiiti&ttit.all:: T. ' - , . . .;.11Q9BMEZO, .. „, _,63 PO. H0.7. : ":'. - . . . - '1. . (.: t i ',1:c'4 li,: ' ••! . : -? '.!,,.!, e ; 1.4) Pi ttl! -,;;:i.-.:114:', 0,1--q. =i!ra,..., :,. '.;.,.,-..,-;:c.W-T . ' 4.;-. i' :i . *iii ',. .E., ,,;"-.,!. :'.. "Sra, :.: . „ , '1A9APIt-LPAR.7&1 , . , .. ., ,: . :; . ... - ; - . ;,.. , . : , - - - - - '',, . -,-:' , . 7. : . -..- : . • - - -_:. ';',, • -7: -.. ,'''. ' ' . '. . '-', :: „: -; :,' • .il,•. : i .. ;- '''' :., '' . '" , ' ' 4. , ', , ...,,, :: ' , . " - - . '-.A. 1 ''-f: " ..,;", : :; : ..::: : : .; .7 .:t,- .- : . ,. : : .,... , i , „ , , v ,„.„,- , i - 1 . .1 „ ., : , ty., ti,1,,,rx,:,poit:4i:71; 4: gi .0 ?! .-ze,;;1 3 i*. i v5.W14::. :'!k,,,qftpf, : ,,C 'ix • 7 ; - .... ;-.7.-i,..nik, -.1 -4.:::••••;';'fil'Oit ;' ' ..- ;)?; ;','.. ..ii . i>1=7:: ,.. . ; 11 . ....,5 .7 i.i .. . : F.7. , ; ', „....„„0,..,;Ar. ,vir',A3=-..,,1*,;`,,'07, . ',..;f'.;• ''''''' A V -:) .- ...4 '.i 1 ;.:';-'''''''''ri.'i . "-: 111 ..... - ..21 -- "fg - 6 , .-1.'r:''' . .';:::' , ..;':ica.1.. ::. • • i': ■,...,`-„. •*..... . .41,..„...!,,„....,,,.,„,,...,.:. • ....... .....•.:,,, ....... ' '-'" 'rue - (.•i•• , ' , 0 ; • '.. ' il •• . `:(4;i7Viti''r N'...Z/;.;.'4'::::. .. ,',. ;:i -," :.• '--- 'i... "....':',.).... '35. •• k . ."v2A 1- 4;4041..tiiit - -.-: iitr:.:::rigir-. •:....c..---..,.. a t.. I $',••• :i .." 0 ''';,:, ..g : ... ..,;-: ? :',,.,, v,74:tg: . . .:00.ol' f.-i:t:g '... : i • .' , : -- ' , L ' : I : 1 . '.. 1 . ': ', , ,-, Izi ,4 , . ii. t,- tit*Ixt :hvA.'ePi, . 7 - -=. .. saxiNVrP?. ; : . . . P 6 .. . : ,d,,, . 1 4 A!, 0 , 4-4, : 4, : , : ., V41,c7:::: R 1.`,4;t ' : .':;: l'. .0.?' `,1'.V. PA ,9: :: • ,... . ?A:.;:,1 'I ': ...43 ge:90. 0 414 '.-1. 4Tii*.elii:;, , Ir. ',.. tg.11j PA FIT . : r. . . . . ..,, .' V.PliP.4::::i C? § .: .4,kiJ., #:,..tki ROsi,y.lij :: ::: .:j ;,, ,, : ,,. 1 I 11 .f:' ,i .•`:•;;Vii.';::• 1 4i'':'•FI , :g.'i..!' 7 A . -• [ 4 , ..1i; ... ',.•:! .Pi',-43 .s- ;;Xi.,44i;1•iigitgftr.;:f .-. ..:0,!4.101;i.q . !.:07.; 7 .:Zi.1■411ft.01, - ; . : F li t1•§,;.7:•:.-.4.s.;.:::'!'k!..•4,.,.1.1:•?,.,-,i ,.••••7.:::-..,::.::.r..4r33-,?-il-7,-;.;,t4lti•4:.gZK-iiri.,'..-.':;,;.'t:cli.4:1CITI'is-tiV`4:.1443Uir..;,4.7;.::;;;.i.'::; 4 144. 1:: 4.: 4 '.1 4 4: . . . t: ■:' 3 1; 14 4 : 2 Fi i .. t: ; I :l i i qt & ■4i.0 4 4' ::*■:41q iP.4-'.:'::n 4. :.; i i ii 1 . :,■ . g . ti ', , i ' g . ;:. , !' i t Z !In i F i : elrii I: ...O I 4 4 ' 1 4 . 1 R 1 11 .: . ... :;.... i d ,:,:4"1::: !. i r.4 : : . 7'4 . F 444 . .. 4'.. I .4 . " 4 . ': .4.'14:4.':t '4..: :i :4 ''.11-::'''''•?.'11::::•Z',..z:g..!.fflR•4.'-:•.1::::•...5i:::.•...Atil'.7■PrTII:ilife:., .g:ii.ill., .. T?..:4.1 .: : • '':- • -- .. :::-..-• s-!:;.:••i • )•:i - . , 4 . ..•1. - ,.:.;'..: , .:::•.1' , : , :::•,.:ii ; :........ ',.i' i l • :,, - ',• , .;:i}t 4 ., :•:::. ; , ir,S , ;- 2 . . 1.. 4 , . .. .. •• '. . .: ....••••••• .. !:::!•et ■ aP9.- ':',.: ; ' , ;.,,...tilwiiti.•.1•Aio:;.,4•JiF,,,,,....,.,,..t4.B]:: ..1....:..,1 I 1 t1,....iil'.-,1'..'"1.•:-..;;.... : : • . !. s. :. '. . - "...'•' . - ...".:.. ':'. ...... tvg,: ..,U '41:::`,,.:3,' . ...'.f ., :' : .: : :**':!: • ••::A.'f..' ,. :•:.:•: : •:',.',1 - 1; .....:.1 . .. . ..'.. *...-.!.:'.';'•:-..:.::•• . :i,'..,..,:;: :;; ••.: ' .• ::.- .:•..:.; ...: .....t ..: r: :::. 4 ..z ' .''''' . ..!'' ' ••:. • .1. ''.•••.::::.,...• •:•:.•s- ', . • •.',.. • . - .1. ' 17 ": • • ; :•• • •.: .4.0.-3..... :. : . : ..:._,•••,..1.:i....,, •"..-1!: I -...,.:..?::....'5,...tr.'.:-JA 0 --. .. '; ":. :'. • • • i 7 .4 4 .. ''':::• ,, : : 4 ......,,. . ,...- ...., .............,•:::.:1 f4 . • 4 *" • 3 a • i ..,:. f: :: i,7•:'.tri.:0.: ff .SmitrIY : fi':'• ;p:::, ,-- : ,;:•::;.. , :.:;::•.-.... ' . . I '''. :-..'''-: • . '.'::. - - 1 . .' . • ' Tiaf fi;c:'•:Si.i.i'Velic.SOk.4'ic; . .i . ::::' , C•i3 : 7 3 .?..'•.' • :: "J.-.'" . •:.'. ',....: • !' 4 •,1,.1.2.-..9%. p=. --•-•.,-,•..,--- • •-,,,..•-• -..--,, • --,... ..--."- : ...,,. ... I , .. ..., t.,,t5tikb.,,,,, 2 ,:p.s "isigb .7.......... • ...,„ ,- - • • • . • ' - 0 . 1 , 1 ' i i.T .. ... L .;" - I ; : •-.-- .NEL: . ..... , ..fr..,.....,.... ..e4i,.-) ......,,, ••„2,•:.•,,,.••.:1•., .•,....,•a ... 1::1 •' , 2•::::•!..i:•:;'.., '::...:•-:' ii. -.../...,% EAST- B._ .. . ..---.::-,-..:,..1.7-A;;7 . I . . ..--..- k;'.. : :.',.. .?.. f:;..h.-,a,.;,;`::: : •i;;. • . iiif l '4 i( 5 0:: :.. i ' 4 .. : 1. 4 ., ! : . :.• • ''. :i • : t.....::::::::-:, • '.......4.1. :-. . r - i' , ! .. : .'...i.. '.'' , .: .:.:...• '.. '.. '•..;..;,,.17,f - :01 . ,"„ ; I '; FROW:=:!,.'19 ...:',.!, F•1' - -÷ _ ' .. ..,..v .,. ... ,..,... ... , . ' •-• .-;•:-..:.,-5...„. ‘... , . , ... 16 • " . 1 ' . n:: : .;:j : • '7''' ..... • ... , ..1 , '. • .. ' ' • C. •: • . 6 48 17 ...- • : ••• - ' 5 . : z • :. 5.: ' :. . ...... • .. t , , . . ... • 1 •-:, .: -5.-..?;:.:11•:'A:-.1:1-5.1.'11,1,..,4........,...2)•,...., I :3:: .'';•:f.',. !' 06 :.• 45 -06 • 50-, : ... , .• Q 1 46 " 15 '. -.• ... a . - ;'..-":1 : 4 : : '.*:-.. - 13 . •.: • -: .: • 1... - • : 0 ..,...,: - 8. .. ; 4:.4.-L. 1 -...; .1'.:. i f '. - 1 ; 1 , ,:: . '' . 06.; 80 551 14.: ,... ..:•:;••' 06: 55-:07 :'00 .2 • • . .. •••• • a . :::-.-..-..5 15 - • .: a '.' - 0. '-:.:•• •• : ':i's:•• • :'4 , ‘: . 3 -1 .i . ...1 0' 'r.1.'...- C ft...1- " .. 07: 00 :05.'.'.'::!-; ' . - . ,., s•' ;, • •.4:: . 21:: . •- -.CI ...:.‘'. . - : .: . L -...`. 6 .' , i': ':- 19 ''.'1.C!i; - - ' :;..,14 1' ,:,..! . :: ,,,. :' ,-... ...c . : ..- .0 : 5 7 , 4 . . .. .z. ...... ,i . 06 - ,- ,..,' : - ..: : . ii . ..,........,.. s.40 -, : ;,....... r. i .: , . 2244. .... ... ...- 00 0 ;...,... ... : • 1 . , 9 ... . i ... :,;,,...: 1_0 . .. ,. ,.. r.4.. , . 1 :22'' '•'' .": .-"7 ' "153' 2 10 r;,';',:z1i, is:. 07.15-'021.20 ::: 0 • 53 21 1 •• ... . : -1.: • : 0 -. 1 • • ' 3 ... . •• 4,. ::: .-,..i.:;,,...3 10 -:::.*- 4 .... 2 1 • - : • ..::: ..I1 '' 63 • 15 '•• .• ..- • 1. :: 22 .0 ••. .0' - . 2 : . • . 2 :,..:,...''. : :::,.: ..1 :...--. •01:25.07i 2. '.52 • . 1. 9, 1 5 2 °-. •••: ... ': 31 • . 0 .-- I - • -2 : • - .3 : ' •::•.'.'. - L i gr )... ; 51 - - : ..1. -. - Q - •:•.: ---.' : - - • : • ..' 0 •*. ' 3 • '' 4 •••••10..1.,..).1.3 .: 'j- .' 07430 .• 01 :•35..., ..:. . I 49 23 . • 14 ..;..,. .. a • . 22. .. 0 • . ..: • 7 . ...•::; . .:21;i'.: 7 !: . ''''. 1 ,1",:•:.160i :'?' • 07:35.-07 - _ . _,... - .• '., .- .. ..18 • • . Q ..;.., 0.... . 1 6 ..- 1.7-: ..,.'73:56 ;1 '' '''-'1".. 0 40 41 45' •'•".- 0 57 . ,A .' - - ^ - 7 • • ' : ' '' :?'''''''' ..' n 43 ' 31 ... - ";'..... .2' .21 0 ••••• - 3 :'.: l • '.. : '-i: -i: 6.. ‘ :,: .07i 45.- 07 ':'$9:',.,:::1-:'..-i-r-: ...,.,-. •-• .,-- • - 9c :16..-- ; 2 . .2: .. : :... ill' ...:•:-....: :.. • '..-•:- 1 ,,.....: - .51 !:::', :•• .1 1 07 50-01z55 . . . ; : - 6 •', .....-1 . '.: ' ' ... 8 .....: ....g.s : • . ... - .....: .,• i:.. ,,,,,, I 1.....1...!'. ..-i: .: 07';.P. ,i - . 37 :: • 18 • . 2 ..).:: :-.• .. . .2.. - • -- • - ... :.: 0 ... . •7.. .: ..3•• . : :'•'. i....ri:N;'• 08": 00708 :.Q i , . .:..... '. 37 . 26. . .13; ....::- .;.:••,. 28 ... .::. 0 ..: . ... • 2 3 26 •• -: , ...!•4;: - . - A,; , :! . ,,..• • tit ..147 K...V 08 - 05. • ' •.:... - ' . - • .1". .. .' 4:. 1 -.. ..1. ..; 4 ' • - ' • • - ';' -on : ` 6 ''.''' 08 ? : :. 0 .; .08:1 ..... 5. ...1.;,: . ,.."..; - ... .. 3 . 34 -25 • 2. •:. -,: • . :-: . 1 • 2 ... : 3 .:..: 1 .'2••,...P. „• ';':,:::...: ..:.-...:..' . .......:.. •.J 14 ' 16 :15-1'; .. 5: : • 1 '. • A. ' • . ' 7 4 '"':'2a:',.4 ...: .f:'. 2 8 : 1 - 5- ° 8.1.20 -. :. ..'' : - 11 - 22 ..: 6 -k: • "1: - : 18 ' : ' • 0 . .... ' ' .o.' ' .: 4. : : ....: l', 9 . :r'.' .'• :;.1 3_2.6 I *:,. 'i.', .k7j17.':= ti 8 :2 0 L'• 06:25 M.'', ,-.: ...., 33 • • . ,-,. 7 ..-...::. :........- 1.5 .. . 4 :.:. .6 ..-.. . -,;.,.. '.• :: : .•:'......,: ..e.:'..4'..:.:...,' .:::!.1.41. '•!:.6•'''''- ri 08 25-08.30 :,a . .3 i , ,3- " . ... • -, • 1....6. 2 ..- •.5 •• •b..- :.:,, .,....„1-..:1::.. ,..1..41 I,:'.,..,. 08 .1 47 1 6 2 20 6 n " ... • -...::- "' . . - -• i : - .. ; .,.. . - •• A :*! ''' 11 :-...• I....4 , ; ..... ...;:k0..::: 08 40' ,' :•-• ,.- :: ". .1 . 4: , ' -- :- . --,, ..; :42; ... :. :. :. 2.• : :° .." ' .. .... '''!* :' I . ';:',.•-,...: !K.: 08 40,06.: 45 .'. :''.• ::. . • 0 . 44 - 14 . 1- • . -- . - -• . • . .. : - . '. • .• •• • . • , :.....I. -..:- ,i : • ,t .; . ... ,..r-,... • ....,.. F... i,1,,. ... • • • • : . . . . ,. . - . . ...,.. - . : . . ' • • : .....' : :' :. . •..... . . • ''''‘ • : 1 : .- '; !la ; • I ::. ': •: •:'.' '• . . . • . . • : • • • • • • , Z .,: !. •,:,t '. I,: 41;', ,; . J.!' ......11.. • , l';',1;;c::. ,'Aci.... : ... • : :: ..1.-..; ',...• ::,1.':', : - . . • . . . . . : .' ' ' , : :.'isn, :: :.i - -,':: .,...• ., . ',. i ..,.:..., ."-: ''''• '''' '''''' ' • . ' •• .. ... .:'-' ''''': .' ' " '..... : ": • • . ' . . .. ,-.. .. '''' ',. - ..' : • : , : . :- . .• . • . . • j. ...! :. r... ' - :•12';: , ', - 4 , .:.:r. --!:••• .z.is7. 'it,',. ..-`.i i V‘i,..!:•44....t; , ...4' ' ...:: . - ..:'.1:::i - • _ '',.7:'.;';',,:.; ::::. . " ' . .. - .,..., ..; - .. . ...,.: : .1.? ., • .•,li • • '.• • ;Ix -.'.,',:li ,:n: . :::i::.: - . - : • • . . . : • .. . .• . . - . : • : • • • ill V! •: -.1.• • .: • :-:: : ' : : :::•:.: -- . . . . . . . . . . ' . , - :::, .! .::. . .,,. •• • : kl. :..., . i ..- . . • • • . -'''. : ,:: ..-t '. .: • •-• .:: - : ii, :- • • ' ... ;...: '."•::::!;,:iy .:.: '.) •-.... i . . : : , ... ........ . . • • . . . . . . .. • • • . . • • • • i'l, ','::: ;T.; ...... :,. : : . . ..1.:.!!4.:•.-:-... • ',.., : ...,i. - .: .. :';'.-;: . ::-. •-. ' . - .... .- ,. . .... ...- :. . . : • . • - . . . . . . ' . .. . .... ... . . • • - -, . • ' : • • • . ,. i... ' : i ... Ai, :2: .... :; .; i ': . ...::41 ..' , ,: . ..' • •.T...,t a. i 339 ,. ••,.....: 1-.'4 . . ,'.' . , .. . . . ...,.. ..... i 4 • - .22 i . 8' ...... 64::-: i.44 .2..... . ..t. .,.. I II .itti al :•• s urvey ...!.. -. 30 1138 7 4 45: 2 2 0f:- 1 ...0i...!'. - ..,.... ...: 4 5 . : . : . 63 . " . .. , ,, ,.6 ...... • ...8.4. ''. .6. '?‘....... $ • -- ..:•• • ''''''".• ' : : • - 2 . -6' 7 . .. 4 .•:.. -. ..- . • • 0 ... - .. . • . 0.. .. /0:. . :•••• ?":•:0.....'• - ..- • - :•;.:•ii ..., ... • ; • .: 1" •' . % "TrtiCkS i 3 3 3 8 67 ....; i ' ' . n • • 0 . .. 0 .-•,:! .. ..:,0 : • . ' 0 ' , . . • r . . .- . - il• : ' • ty - - "..',3!..?:;'• • • . 0 ::: '. il.' '.:' : , :. :. 1 :.'; ! S.:A±ipa laUdOttl - • 0 : %., * * • • " • - * .3 . • 0 . .. 0 ... .3-z . 14 ' .• : „ - t'!! . •‘:. 7 !•r:... •■••••'', , " •';' `-'-''''''' • : a i i'! - • • . • .. . • .4i :: - ' '.:•.,% ,':t •,!: • !. •:, 4 ,•i P. :::::,-,' f4t:: : • • - - . -:• - - ' ' ''''' . '''''' . . .. ' . i::::::',,rda••:::::: ' • 91 ...' i '' 4 i6.96-',..... 39 • 239 • - 2 . • -:. :-• • - : 9.. ''''' ... .';'' fv-Y . 7.S.'"': i 182Z • •.):. • , I ' ' 06 - 45' 07 :45: 17 6.67. 7 121 ..._ .' - - • ,!..• • • - • . • • . :3 . 3 : .::.::86...:.'J; g. ,:f'.:! . . •■?.• 'ri :' Oa- 08 - 14. /. - ..'• it'. ...: Ha. .. ..:. : . - 8 • .• ":40 :.• 5 1: '-..1 :..11',....,' t'':.:i .. ..rfa': 35t 135,.:: • :.:. %.:.: Si .. • .10 : 22.: :52 '.';:26 ,... 07. ;1 ..7, u Y.; • . .:': 13 510 :. -275 .....1 ; • 2 - ..• • : . 46 .' - 65 : •45: i . ,..... d.,:, • „ 1 *:•:,,,,,,..,. 07.. 30-.08.i 30. . . 3 . 237 . .14 6 ....• 65.:- • 22q• : : q: : - - . • • - :. .::.....,:;:• l';1::4 07:: 45:=08 45 .: ••• 1 ... . . . ... .,-- .. . .. . ..:.• , . ••,,,,,...-, :. . . .. • • . •.... • • • . - • • • . . .. . T .... t'. .....1.•:: • , :: ..1:4-',.; "i ••1j.,.1.t ii '.'.. •••': :' ' • • - . . .. • . :. . . - -.. , :• ..: :"::••• ..- -,... . • • . . .. ' ::. ... - . . . 1.;,:,:::.1;,i iili;q , .... , - , , g :..Y • -..,... ': !•';i . . • - - -: . .. . :. . ;...i;;k`i,;',.'i,' -4 -'.. N' , 6 , ...: , .: , :. - : , ;.•:•, • : ..t.. •-•,..• k:,, .:*-• '.. .: • . . ' • . • ... ' . . -...;:, ... •i: •;;•:: • •• : . • •• ..• :.1 • i i 3 ;•••• '.• • , : .• . • - • ' : -- ' :IVI '''''''''''' ''''..", '`.; ••• . ,:- ,: e:47.i• l. 4 e '' '''<''''''' : . ;:1 ' . I. '• '''i: :: . I •',. : . • . -:' - . . • - : . • ‘-- ''., ' ;'-:•i ' • • ' • • • ' '' . ,' •• ,.•`-z.... . .., • ; A - ; . ; :::::if,4:17.--.0":''P'Ar4,!'rq'.14;-71iii.:'•1.•!:.,'=:1; • •••• •. • • . 4 ,• '',..:-.: - 1.4 '-'1'27,.:: . .4 !'.'... i: '''•:':".. • . i-;: •'. :••••,::. 1 x. ' • . ' •!: :t; .;'.3. l' .,.• • . . • ' . ' . . • - : .. .. . •• . . I - ■ . ...Y,r.,, wrl fr... ii,;,......ri.,...,..v... __ ...;:;,....ii.t45 _ ,..,..., ..r., ; .. 7.,..,,,,..,...4%,. ,::t_ti.„4.,10:7Lir..a 1.,..,,,,: I ;',- , : 1 - :,z, ;;,..,.;- . os.`,.:41:A ; '...V,F,;:":0::,...; ,..; ..,.....: • I . :i,,....., ..,,,:', : .i.-'. . I • II :t:::;:,--:.„..:..,16:25.t.16.:3 ...,. .. •... „-. . 17 1 6 - .:: 0 . . 12 • - .. 1 - 1 2- .. :. . '. ..:.;,........": (7 i... - :::, ' . . „ - . - - : ':: . : : i ' . : ' ,.: . ' ; : :'•-:: -•••;...; • 17 ;10- 1 :1 :-.-,.-.-.!,-,...; I..... . ... • ' . . 1 0 -.. •.. 3 . : . 'fill. ..., , .. :. ‘,.-2....r:i.3•:-.:. t v , ...; -,,", c - s.,..: ..;., • . , ., . 3 .. , ,.■ ..,, I 17 • 13 :..: -0 • ',.. 13. • 6 I , -.• i . All; • ,'... ..',::;....t.-: i'zj.ii •'-' 1. ••••"" ' 1 • • • • I , �: - ,.,•r;'�. . <, . tt . „•,�. F"�i. � 4t. w -: �_i - ''•`:�S ,'• a:'•: '.t:'L• �_r,;edtt:� - ,. - ,',�.'::•' .r,�, yy�i:� •v.,` �',�:,... :;7: ": a-, .5( �'•Y: 5 at }' ..' :; ni� .,,., r , y ''t '.Y - t' '4*9+�,o „-LtQ �" : .:1 � ,,. t 1rii u., ,�;.4.cr,-,,., ,." .. <:'. +? :si ; ht'C` . � /�. I a: y . 'it' : ,.,, .�, ,.nr; . tom! . �' .(� �til'` c• tiid!•.•Y.: �: ;a• • j•�. dr. 'a:• {;:w ' _ ��; '' "• i �.n r r:�,�,rrr ., , r:?9� -r., � ��;: ••� q � ; ; +. .'tf a;.:..�:'•';,.._:�'e: '- -: � � . �i' {'y .,� <.,C^ . ','``. �y ' =1:,;: f?- e t.... ., : ' t:. .i ..:_ 3 -. "...[xwe'.i48 ?;,b :1 . .,7 =vT;: �`ae .i I ,wG:�.,. : i .. - : t ' . 7 :P - .,� 1 '+'. q t:.. • ,, ` "•tl " alt- ti "'�7 • i - � : ;:A • : m 4 • 't .. �1y 1' >' •. �l ice. ;.•� = :� .rxat z.. u:�•, - t�:%c ; y „ � r. t :' : d, T?.;;3�' �v� as �t. i �C; c' T1 .s •��• :: � " = t ; ��} ' • ' ;� • . x . .w r l: ti .c�.� : B 9 v. > � � 'i,. .. , ..0 ..,. ... ' !� rp, t ":. .,dr :.r '' r -... ,. <. a•,.z' _ , :w..uro. . :y:,A _ , L'-:.` � " f f 'y ; . : - i) !R, '„?, - { +,r, ?. � :'t .. . '. t ' .. ,. . ^l. : - k.i ^ ' f . - �r �, . wpi " �Z: 1 '�; t ti. .;7" , •• t a �. t y t. �` . p• i • a, • '4: . :[, ,�"�' , ��° ^ .�� Y �� < � •:, : .• t � : - Y 'tA . J.''•i. al .'M"•'"'i..1n, •(�.. I'. _ ":t_ •.7,''.o-;�:' ,.l , ; 4 _a . '!!, 'S ir " . <ri �, M, r'.J \R I lC't n�'�i''h `�ipi,. l' .{ t.. ?'�'n,.�tn, { 7 G[, i ,r ! ' ''1 ' '.::1. 1 �..�y��� : '4'vl�t�_ r ': i'9'a+N!' :u•.,; , : ;�;.: � '^'i , » :9;,r. d�e4. ' 3�, I :i _; 7� ; j ,. F,. '-° t_5,:� il ,,�:••IA, "� +�i' t •-! ^ ;: . ti;i: . %'' ;�„ n� r�s :., ::k' :0'6 " ' ;;5: :4e.<. : r: k_•,' _4,. * ,t.. , .... i , !r :'i . IM$ STAKT -III % J.� , •,y x.,. • 9'1' 0 � � '. iY,�'.!� . I: n 'i, sj, �a. • a . � %r ;_t, ^i. .}.: °„ sr ..iF I ;4 t 1 , �.' ,r i . 1 �J y ,�. ao -4' 1 .4. .',:'i` -,e i t. t,5 ' �ra�:. �.. C . �:. y ''� •F ' .kt :M t d1 , �!.. .� -� , .'. S in .�.. , .•, ; ... .,. k�-p ` Y :.Ct `:� .r t a •�. .} L: jj _ x .:Kjr t 51 v1•'k. . t � `t ' 44,�,, -1' ';'•.: :�,:. '',a�" ..� 'l °`.'�i ,ytJe "te.•r -. •el. .7 I :�� "'� [[..- t qq��'S�tY�F. .r': a'. }, y a�•n' •Y .4' t sl L:�.yf.7•�;:L Fib' ;', Fit _ . �' [.:. iF'i= .,l f (; •i ) .Y •. 1 'hi. ,l'^• - !. J .a �•:�'- * '•,F.i . pr ;•. • � ' ;1:= : ' .G •: ! , R .i' i �' - y , , 7 .•:om: r„ • `'V:- rf G• r7�q� rry �G t ! iJW= + /:4 ; c G it i i ':' , Y,, ; r ,, �' :� ^ :,F, •.;; • .{ �..r i::' - � •� ° B i A. r:F:•Z,, �:•'�, . a�•, - r : '. . I -I0 ;. .r �.:. T- •S T RU CKS' i ,1 ,:n; , •.< ; ',S � " ;`•i :,i•:_. s �'. p:- _ BY' A1� ..: 'r„ r'., � s , ^� . _ ;,,,� . 1' :' fir... �a " •► � ;•� -, :- : � . : • I +: 1002= - ► _ ak: Hour . :.1. A - s ^ ' I ' • :: w,. • Q 0� R =a s :15" T r. f `Snh :. .. a t " .�= • 1 ..: T S u r r e y,• : < ' : .,,.'„ .K,., , ^� :� rt � • ' �. I j ,, k , i :t:?:'.,ryj.JF71: ''' • . MD / ,: : ' t•. I ,. k! , ,.:r, ii .F.1 *':$OUND : r i ' . a ..:- ,fi, . r,t,ts • FROM. :. 1 i' :At,:•:;-:9i. • . - ` 06:50_06 0 55 0. • 1 , .. 5 .. . 0 . = 1 ' .. i :. s I 8 .:,.. • 0 0:,, p 0 �,, F ��`;, 03; :a <. :• Oe:55 :0.7:00.: a 3 0' :0... .F p::;::z:• w,: � :: ' :, - ' A0 =07:: 05. :ti ` 0 - ?4 0 0 0 . 0 • ; , : { , 0 ' ' : : ' , : 7 < a ',.3 :`;`; 3:19 }' t 07:0$••••,;o7...,-..1 0 "iJ :.. 0 . 84. 0; 1 !.: .' . h 0 i . . :,.. ,. z;r '; 07 :.10..-Q7 7:20 ':: : ,: .:.:' . . 0 . 2•. vQ 4 U Q . p Lp . 0';:: `x;.39:;':; 2. ,...10 > ' a: •, 07': a.. p „' ;1 ,....!'p: 15- 0 j:.. 92 66 0 0 000 0 0' :34':. r' 1..,.i.:1...--;-:,'C.`::: ; 07:20_p7: 0 0 • 91: 1: 1 . a 6 . p 0 0 0 ._ .. , : ' •.. ;.148' Q7: :30 =0 25��U7 0 -`..7a.- 0 Q 1 :.0: - 7.' '0' • �0 .. 0 0-'..:= _ ��l0 ' � ; Zr .'.�'130 � , : � . ]:a6 07 ?, 0 7:.. • • -, 0 r.0`.,r, 4 2-:::,., : ; ; ,;''•'.:,,•: : :3 2 i:0. 4• b 0 ' ::;:. II :: 07• z35�07 : 0 76 4. .: 0 :0 � 0': � _ � 0:: °•:3 �- "s :::,� • y .: :9.R:. 7:40 - -07 :45 F' 0 87. • 0: 5: •r - 0 3 . ' I $- : ri ,it '"`'!' 5'= 07•'50 ": . 96 2' v.': • I - ' 0 0 _ 1 , - : I; : . 4 ,, 28 : • ; �:' 3 ` 5 0 • ' r ; r � 7 :: 5 0077 .::'. ; 0 78 ; Q D _ I ` 07: = 08 _ : i s 0 0 • + 0 -08 1' ,. • 3 .0 3 • 0 ;�;; .1:.7, �. !:.; :. 08:0 :0 =;: • 66 3 11 �••'0 7: ,;': t; :: . ' V ,., oSc05 -08 1 • 0' '0. _� _,, :L ' 1 : 'Y 6 • 0 :.' 3' 0 2 :0 t,' 3 : i,.r. .Q;.'.� 90. : : ,:" ,: 1! � :5:: 08' :- �.0 : -p8 0 0 ::3 4 :0 0 0.::• :�';3 ;;r' 0.' ;;.; .1 i.... OS c'3,5 = 0.8 : 2b :: 0 49 1 . 6 .. 0 0 : 0;•:,•:,;::•;,,,,--;:: ; !:1. ;.J,: : i t • ` .;; ,; � 08 : 2 ; 2 5 �'• 0 59 .. • 0 • . - ` -0 0 - 0 0 : ;;1; 30.;..�:: ; .: '.;'.; 08:25 -08:3 0 54 1 • 3: 2, • :0 0 . 0... .. ''. • 1-;:i. 0 :'' :,i 1 ' , a ' :; .. 3 - 0,,.. 0 : .. t : . ` _0 6 ' > 0 101 ' r :, . :; 0$ 8:3;: r 0 • 6 5 0 ' 0 0: 3. �: • i - ! 08,:35.=„Q8 :411' 0 62 • 4 • : 0 • 0 0= d: ;. 3, • p9 4 $ :45'' 3 I !' , i , ri 'i' "�� >a •..t'• 1 •' 1 \.1'!Y i ...i ; :•,,, :,.... i ', ' -: . :'' - • • - . - • i, :y.. ' .....:.. %:` 3 0 a-- 1'';. 39 9' : 93 . ` ;;! • %;f':i ' ), 0 1731 2 7 . 1 0 . ' 0 6 Q • 9 :: •• 3 - _ ...913. • ,• Total";; � , 87 0` 0!' i 2S;" , • i ; � r ; : � � ` 3 ' PHF' �' i'x 0 .5 : r 71 0 . Q . 0 . - SA O .: '3 : • 8 , :. t : : :.i:. 0 2. 0 7. 0 4 �-0 ;0 -o,•9 4 .. i ' 1 ' i ied : . .. 0 . 0 . • 0 . t1. Q: ., Q ;: ; . - >::: ' :St e 0 0 0. 0 ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ; r.. . I , i s r-!' .. 0 ;_. : . . l. „; • 9 . ; t J .. ;:::a: ; • `:s` -' sx ,... ;,:12; -223• { • • �';. , .., - 06 :45-07 :4$.; 0 93 2 6 . 12 : : : • ' • 0 ': , 64 p ri : ,I t: 27:.,x ' , : ; .:19` ,' 15!#4' . • x r • i '' : 07 : , 0.0- 8 ; 0 0' „ 0 1008 1 3 1.4'_ . 0 57 0 0 A: ` "1s: �;; 1,1 1 ' _ Ly ;,. .07 0 •988. 4 0 2. • - 0 6 =': ;'; :.15. 8:1 14 2' . 0 , 1' 5 :.i � 8::� 6'.; , 1 -;: " 8 65 - 2:9 Or' 42 ; r 1 " -:.a' 07:35 -08 3 0 0 42 0 0 0 F 1 .�,; ;:.,... ;,.:I 7 9 G . 07 :45.08: . , . 799 27 : 2 :$ . ' ;;: .w , r: is . �: 0 ':;r:..; `' ;. • 1:L•1..,,,,,.--t:..',.:1.1:,:, . . - • r,.. . . {. T.' ;,i•uu , f r e e �':f .•'.�i !. ..r ��•� , _ : 7 ; ` ,k.. ' • -r�. {7: L e ,yy.. ry ,, ' i F . rl y f I ,: ,. I - : ✓.,. 7, _ `,t.:•'lri • A ';.y...' '.....:::„,;- .. t - . 77 :' , , ii .■,:,'"::, ''.7 -. ''c.. rr....s-'7'-;'.76;■- 77 i.r tr r" . . 7 •,' - l'''''11' .7'7' ' ' ' •-•••'' '.%' ■.? >li '... • '' . ' .....• r • t,....1. .,:.••,i...,,•: . . ' : .•1 . ,' ..... ■''.... •••% 1..1!%:.4 •:•.; :, .• '■ • . 1•"■'...‘::::• •:..,,,, .;..,.... ; 7, :77:,,Vz.7,i • ,• , •.:......,..; ... . • ... .: .., • •:?!•::: :•.i. ....:;:,....liqrW.:: - .....i . :::• , ,,,G. , .:, ,, :::•.::.•-•.; . ....... ', •'.: i'l.•;;;:r• 4 .., ... : ,'„.•;:•:.-.,,,,,•'..)::::,.!...;':,,,:,..:•••:....t2,:,..:••,,,,;, , ,..,-, ; :..::•;... , ,,.,...3j...N:•:;:g . V94,0_4.-:: , :i.:- , ...! , Iii ,.. -1.• ,: I ' '-'"": ..:,;t.!..e,:- .. ::... , ....1t,QP.' ..._i ... ..M:::-*, ,C.P , ........'::'!; I; '' ';:.1.-.:,..q :% . •?,,:;,.,.: '''''.• '''.'" '''•• •• ... '`' r ''''''''' . - ::'::' • :' ,::::'''. ::' '":: ::;:-: 7; 0': 1 ; 4 «-ia " '' - i' • • ' ho ::•:. . I '' ' ' • . '‘-'7A,,-,.:1":,5;1';•:.4'...f12.410'4`1tritiier'n, :* ';',:..?::: I g ',.. i'!..:,..,:i.::',...;il' vr•,..1...4? :"•:.',...•.- ; , i ....,.:+417.4 . .s . ,, , ,,..t1 , k;i•,1 , ,,, , iir2 zki: ..;.,..,..::.. : .. : ,,,,,.... f „,.... ; ,.. 7 , • ......,„,....:. , .. • ; ... 1; .:„.„-•:,... ,.........-.,..r., 1 ••....,..,..,.. r. •. i -,.... . :. ,. • ...,: •MTE. QP..,....t. :,';‘,..y .,:?it ......,:i .-.Z.....; N :.,.:' ...:`:, .,•:,. 34 .; •-• •!?.; '1' !''..:.'.! : IC ."):• ,m...L:....• :.- • • • . - • ris* .riv. :rart, ,, ?-''••: , •, , i•.: , , '• . , ' • ' :-. ....• . • ...• q,''••••-.)::••41:.: ''..:.• ,. ::-.. • :;i;'•;:i 'fet..: i - .....: :., • . . • .., LAI_ .....x :3-.J.,,,,,.„, ":•:,: :4:- N.' • ,: -•:.;• .: s•. e?..•....- -.. : .; . !,... • -• ',1:.c.km .....;. P, ; ... ,4;ir;!;;; ::•!'•:•:•;:', 11 • R••'.::C0 . ..11.:•:1;•:'.."7. _ ' : '.-_ .. .'...'..i.M . :.....' . 4...C.3. 4 - f...4- . .. ..;,:i '...'.' :-....::. r:: .. T:. ., .... ••• : .:!!,•..,::$; ,2:::::.• • !- . • .i••z...... ''. I • ;::•71 It t7?-2:2' .. i ' : -;•" -,:..;..?,-:', 7 " c .-... ' ::4:.• '. "-:.. •• .:: ,-:•':•!... ,24 1.. 7 'nr• ,••••••',. • ; ••. .:. i • . . ...•:„:::•• . i: '•':: .:::.• ::1!1:.: '• ;k•;4 ':.k-Y ..1..;.:K_,.;•: ,...',;:,;•.:',I":': • . ::::01 - . ., .. • . 1.,,.. 1:;:.;:v.:i ' 0 .*! ir. .• , •.1 !/...4-:' '• . . . . 0'..,;• 1/ ,:•. '...-•:, :'g;. • :.••,''.''.''....? .: 19 ... . •• • • " '. ',.. • -.• . . fqQ:, -'.'• .-- I ‘; . .. • • - • . !ii,... • :T-4 .1 9% • :-! .::-.: • . . • . . :• ••;,,••;•;.T I 4: •:.• 'irk::: . •. . . . , .„, •.,.. • , ... - ; • s.: ,:. :!.; ..: .7.,'1„1,1iit4,...., •,"„ t..-. 1 -..ilti :::.:•:. .: . 61S-+ • • . - . ...4-989'.:: • .:y'' . ' i .. - -.... • • . ' • .. : - : •: i' i','....'i ,....:' .: p-...- 891i ' . ' .'-i • - • . . . : • '-- .. p:•-..904 : . . .' .,,, .. . „ „. . . . .., . TEv.T,QTAL ... . .. Y .S1. ...'. . , . . i..."'" ":"c :. r•-: 'Ilt 1 . v' :1 - • ' - ..• -• ..4' :-.. -• - ' . . ' . -.. T=1:1121.101G5 i BY', . • PROPICIP:f..i;t , i 1 : ',.. ';.. ,'.: . -‘ • - * . • IS. .,..`'..•,A. '.....r:i- ,. . .. . ..,.. ..' ,.i'., '..:,...: • : , .: ' Ai • -::.: •••-•...'.: ,:..1..;•:.111 ,-,....;,- 63a .-4;,. :...;.: ...:•:.. .. - • • • • • - . :•• ..,:••:: .:•- 4.i. _ '-'‘,•,.. : • ::;',. ••. • 0 - 0 • . 0 - • ,..:,..-:: . '..'. -':Peak .. s..,,.....,,,,, :, :•:,...:••• ,:••••:•, .-. 50 TtafEi:o." ithY' • '''' ' t 1 : .: • -•: " . • ' -"•zi f ' 1.:'... ... --'...• :-'•••'•-'•'?:;::. '•1 -;;'::''''' . T= ' . Oi P-'0 • • [C . ..: ' : :: . !;TE. =17 : . • Tc‘affl- ..` ::':..• :, I •',...,iI.,.....ru.:, ? ,:::.,.,:.•?:::...),,... .: .•:, ict;•:.',.. • : :7 ;• • ••,.:. ••-•-- ... - • .,. 1 _.': •,,' • . s ... • •:' .:',.: ... _._.,,. ,...._ i ••• • + -: i . .4,--„ i •- : :;,...„.,:.L.;-,,,,, ,.?• ; i zt,i• ; -;:, , ,: ‘ , . .'•,..i4 • : ',..f.' . •E' .. -,!,••• S.' H'',1: • i '• ........ i'. • -sEAST 13(5t*b • • SPOTU•;;P.99N.Pil: i' VPR):4::.Boul‘!•!-J•:...• ,::, , :•.V. , ' : siffeVkiirott .:5;_ •-• :. • . .:- • - :....: -•-• - A • • -..` ."-`.:'7• . i . , - ••!' • • • • • .. • : ,.... t-: ' FROM:" -,:. . , . 1 . .. . . . :, r i, :;:.:.--, . :-..,o,-;.,....i ;; : v•A‘-t -` '. ::'••: • • --4P . 1 ..4"1 . :. 1 •.::.,: i t s , : • 1 . . . - :...,.4; .„, .. . . ,.... Ad ...„ .. • -... • . .:•:,::, ,..,!••,.:(.....• •.,1/0::A.;.•,F..7..::j../. a :, ;.•" ' '■•T : • . . . . . . .. . . . . : .. . '": . ; r : ; . • i ,....?: ' .16 ;,15,1 _•: 20 -,... 0 45: • • 0 . 2 ... • 0..; :, 0 . 0 0 • • .0 .. ..... , ...0 0 .....i : .; ; :: : . : 0 1. 1 ,,-.....,,: 16 : 20 .- t 25 - ,:i . . • 0 51. . 2 • : ...:.... ':;... .6.1. ,,,;.....- ..:....;:t..:.:. 1;25.16.,:30 ' • 0 .. • 52' 3 1,...,, .11. ••• 2 0- .0 .. .: 0 -.'...7. ....8: ••,..6 ... ! , ....:i. ......,),-- 4 , - ...!.., • , 1 .. 1 •.' . • O.; 1 .16::..32.411 -.. 1 - 42- • 0 . ... • 0 , . 2 ... . • 2 . - 0 I ,if: ' 163 '.:-.,,1 :40•:.::. • . 0 .• 50 0 . . r• . -:. ::- 0 "*. •':.... 0,.., :.'.!.:6.2!'....1,.., ......1.1., •••,-.;, i . , : .3 16:40-1 45..."..:.. . 0 55:: 0 0 '-.... 0 -,-. • 4. 0 : . 0 0 0 0 : . 0 . .. ''''. • -... - ' . .'i!': . .16 :45-16 :50 .• 0 53. .. 2 . • "••• .• 1 5 .0 :..101... . 1 . 0 0 ...0 . • 0.... '.77... • '..:•i, 2.....,135 'n '" ' .' '6 ' • .33 ' ' '• 16 5O-1 :55 " .1 1 0 : • .G. - • 3 . 0 0 . ' 8 ....,......,......,.;,........•.....,.,•••;:•... , ...,.:..;.., 16 55-17 0 2 :00••E 0 65. . .. '.....0! ... .0 0 0 : ' • 0- '..., . 80 0 . 0 : .: . .0 .:;77 i; ' ....IA i '• • ••••••:Y. 17.- 0017;05 :' . 0 57 • 4 .1 ..:... - Gi ;.. . 4 • 0 0 :. . • '''' • ' ' . • 1 • os • 17 10 ' ' 4.••- ' 1, .: _, .-.: 1 1 . ; . :1.: ,, . 0 52 • . ... , :. • •'• O..; ..1 • 0 . 0 . .. 0 ..• .. :.:,,Q. . ::... c1 8.-3 . ... ; ' 17 1 a 17 15 0 54 2 1 0 3. 0 0 .1, • 1 ',.-!:1:;•''.v.i.: • ..: ..: ;!..;:: • .. - • . .• . -: , :-:. :. . - . . • :. 0 - Y i,- - ;•.: 1;7/ •L; • ••'', • •!::...' 17 : 15-1.3 20 • I's' 0 5G. .. 2 . 0.. • • -.0i .; • . 3 • .: 0 : 0 1 . .- 0;• •-• 2 : . .: 0 • 0 . 0 • . - . 0 ....•••:': .9•'...: .. ..5...f:'.'•::' - 5 ••ri..I 17 :20717 :25. ... . - 0 ' : -• . 3 .... .. .. • . A . 2 • . : D • .. 0 . • 0 ., 0 i . • .., cp• ..i.,:,..-14. •:; i....17 : 25 -3.7 : . : : • 0 33. 3 2 - : ..-.'M.:' 'A. • '. 0 .•- .:!•:• .••••• :••!...; . I 45 :!:•'•!.: ' 11 : 30:17: : • - 0 54 • 0 3,, 01 -.. • . : .2 • u 0 . .• '0 •:'•,• 0 * , .92 . • .. -, ---3,5•$.. ,..,..;•,,, 17 0 47 - 2 0 • •0. - .. , 1 . 0 . 0 '0: . 0 ..... ':, ;!...i .. ;7 ''.'•.'!3;18 ',..:'.4'.....1 0 -0 :: 0:•• :••'5.;:'. 1 sa •!. ;:•• • .. • : !--:;-.. ',..:::•• 1.7•;.AQ-. .• 0 57 0 1 --. 0; 1 • • 0 . . . I 17.:45t1-7:50::: . 0 53. 1 0 .: • .. a - ..4 • 0 • - • 7. !..:•.• . ',:••,.. 0 . 'O.:: .. • 0. ....:•;83'': -.': ... XI.... 17 5Q"17.; 55 :- . 0 57 1 .. 3 0; .• 3 0 0 •• 0 • ••• . ;1(I.. i. 3,2, .„.,!.. 3 ' - .3 ; Oi: • 2 • .• 0 61 0 : ,..• 'i 17::,15,5;- :00 :••• 0 0 35 4 3 • • • .0 . p• .. • 0 0 • • 0 • 0 • . •!.,".- :' -: i A.24. :;..... .. 0 . . 0 .. .0 . • i',-,65 • '',.... -; • ...:, 101'. '•',..• ,, ' ••••!- 18 : 0018 : 05 • • . . 2 .. 1. 0 :- .: 0' - :!-6 . 1:' - 1: ••: 9; ; '••••!••••.. -.'......'':•!.. ia- .. ... .. . . .. . . .. . ........ a • •33 3 :2 •.• • 7 ... .5 ,.: . • 0 18 :10 . - 0 45 • - 0 . ...0.• . ' .0 .. . •3_ .. 0 - '•,-,---;:•,..:,. •-. •••-; • •• ... I ! ; ; g.::::-.:.i.,• : • • - 0 0 . :: .2 - ..; 11,5 ... ; : • • 7 . ! .. . . • :.! • , : .1,...• it - '.. '.. : :. .......],i,'-'4i., ,, • : • ••• • • - •• • - :;*•-..' ': • •:. : • •• t • ,..;'•‘..,e, '..t.::: •. • • • :-... .:, i • .i . •,; . . . • • • • : • _I: , •', -1. I. :.: ••,...:) ...:• • '..•-•:i'`r;.:,?..:' .. •• -. .... i ..::. • • • • . . . • . . • : .. ,, .....: • i... i • .• .; : 'r.'I , it - V: : . • 1 . , . 1 : . :., i.f1::: 1 1. •• . - . . .. ';'..:'. • ' '., i • - . . • • . . . • • • • - • • • • • -, . ••• 4 • , • .,' ‘ .• ••• • . . . .. .. . . ...,. • , . . . ' . ...' . • ; . I . . '.:. ' . 1 e; '.1 ,.:..., . . ' . • .. . . . .. • • i1.. • : .. :::' : . % ."':' . ' :I,. ..... ' : : 1::::',..-;•!>".1.:;., 7 s . , . • .. . . .... . . '1 . '''. '. • " • : : '" %; .: 1 1';'' '' 1 . , - :;',.: .:-.. • . ' - ..: • • . . •. '.i '.' '; . :;. .:-..;.i S'i''.! i .. ; : .• . . • • . • . . . • . . : fl :• .• • -...! . • • • - . . . • • • . • • : . . . • . • .. • . . • . . .. - • • . .. .. . . . • . . :I • : ., , . • ' •, ;. : .. : j. ' '• . • • •••• • • • . . ' • :‘:.:-:';'.:'i.;:".. ... , • . .. : .. . . . • • . : ' • •fis,::... • ' ': • '• ,- ... ' . . , ' I .rot'ar.survy • 42 • • 2 0. • - • •• • 0: 180.4.:. 152., 32, •,. 2 3.179 . 36 25; • .. • 0 G ,-.: .• • . .. . 0 ''. .• : . 1'. .....j ... ' :.* PHF ::.:- ::- .25 : 89 .59- - .63 : -, .. 0 86 ::... : : - 0 u • 0:... . 0.. 9.::i.•k7I ,.,...4...„:1: TI 0 2 0 ....:-••. . .11 • -• .024 .. .0 0 • 0 - • ... 1:ii- ..• . v.:.; .. .* • .;:•;:z!, StOrg ... Bu.et3 0 - 0 0 . 0 0:: • .. 0 . ' 0 . 0 . ... O.' :: -:..".' ,• 0 •;- ' . : , '.. • : ` . . , . , .,. ..-...: ,j pe •::.•.?:_sii: :: 0 2 0 - 0 - . . • 0, 0. . Q.. • 0 ••• • •0:: •• • 0 '::.;•: . . • • :..:•.4 • - --- ...tt- .. . . . • - I .....'..:'4:t }#41t1)k=10t, S' • ' ' • • • . .. : •• . •• • • - . . ....., .o ,..i. .. . . .... .-':•:,A; 16 . 2 627 . . 16 II . • :0. . : 16 . • : 2 . 0 •' :. 0 ..: ' '. •:.;3. ig-Q j ''.egl..; 16::„30.17..:.30,: . • 2 607 19 9:. • .a. 20 , • 2 . 0 ' . • • • .:..Q, i - 1 - ...; • ......- : 16:45 1 618 • 20 .10 " •:0,: . 21 , • • 0 .. - 0 • •• v ';.•! • • '..!.. i I , ..1,..f• B g ;-:.,,,,..,..„: 17 Q0-18 00 0 602 22 14 . .. ..0.. '26. . ". 0 0 . : 0 • • .4 ,9.5911:1•::82.':..17 . .....0f.. 5. :.:.3.8 :15.. • 0 552 . 20 14 .. ' .. • '0; • • •126 - • 0 • 0 . .. . 0 ,. Q ' f•.: 900 i.;•;:;;:...Y.... •: '..,2:',•..... ,.!,... :1-1: ..:-....., ...... : • -.::-• ,• ••.... . • . • 2 . .: : :. • :- .'...L 4 , . :.',..tr..7.•,:' -,:,:l•-R i': •••• : - . ',...5. . .! • . . . .. . , , ., ,. . ..).. •. ; 1. , .., • . • ' . • • .... i :'• ":. . i' -■ • '=.:.• . ‘ 1:'• .::•..., - • •4;• ., i • '::: 4.4 .... •-..j - ' - . • . . . • ... • .. • . . . . • '' ' ....' ' • ..* - • • - • - - . - . . . . . . 4 ",• .' - : ::::i 1 . .. ., ':.!••.::' • • . '.' . ' •.• ; • ..,'' .-:, ....- ...: r : • . : • I 1 , . . • : .. ;; .,. ip; ; ;".: $ '1'; .. i. ' • - ' ' • ..,..: 0ft ; •:- • ; ‘i ....:: .::•m • . - • • • • • • • . • • i'.:■ .P ..ii: ! . : . ; ..:::`,3., I I I 1. . I I islc � ,_. � S OCIA TED -:.::; 1:::::::::. AiiE:,, .:.:.:.::„.::-::-,- � N 1 IN T k As rI °' A NNIN c (ATEP) 1 I ZA • 1 APP END I X A CU I R RENT LEVELS I OF I SERVICE CALCUL 1 I 1 1 ' -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/29/1995 7:25:58 INTERSECTION: TIGARD - DURHAM AND HALL BLVD I VOLUMES: EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR METRO SIZE: 100,000 TO 500,000 ANALYST: FILE NAME: I . !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 90 G= 74 Y= 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I/ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D -E * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * SATURATION 86% II ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** II APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! ! II 1 ! RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! 0 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! 3 ! ... .0 ... .0 ... .0 L.. 12.0 ! I ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R L T R! ! ! ! ! I SOUTH ! 3 4 35 42 ! 42% 42% 42% ! A A A ! NORTH ! 285 35 162 482 ! 86% 63% 63% ! D -E B B ! WEST ! 266 676 11 953 ! 86% 86% 86% ! D -E D -E D -E ! I EAST ! 60 251 122 433 ! 53% 42% 42% ! B A A ! APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! II ! ! ! -- ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! W ! 5.0%! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! I E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! -- ! ! ! ! APPROACH V/C VALUES I MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LTR ! .023 .000 .000 .000 TR ! .022 .109 .382 .104 II LT ! .004 .000 .000 .000 R ! .019 .090 .006 .068 T ! .002 .019 .376 .070 I L ! .002 .164 .153 .034 . N -S V/C =.230 E -W V/C =.448 TOTAL AMBER =.178 MINIMUM V/C =.067 II ! LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! ! ! ! ! I SOUTH 126 749 ! SOUTH ! 7.3 7.3 7.3 ! 0 48 0 NORTH ! ! NORTH ! 17.9 17.9 17.9 ! 286 197 0 WEST ! 1174 ! WEST ! 16.7 41.6 41.6 ! 271 462 0 II EAST . 1225 ! EAST . 7.3 32.2 32.2 ! 69 150 0 . HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08 -29 -1995 Associated Transportion Engineering & Planning, (ATEP) I Streets: (E -W) DURHAM ROAD (N -S) HALL BLVD Analyst: DW File Name: Area Type: Other 8 -29 -95 AM PEAK I Comment: EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound I/ L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- No. Lanes 1 1< 1 1 1 > 1 < > 1 1 I Volumes 176 422 1 19 789 278 17 27 34 220 8 304 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 II Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I EB Left Thru * * NB Left * Thru * Right * Right * I Peds * Peds Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * I Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right I Green Yellow /AR 11.OA 39.OA Green 20.OA 8.OA 3.0 3.0 Yellow /AR 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 II Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sa v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS II EB L 216 1770 0.855 0.122 43.4 E 21.9 C TR 807 1863 0.551 0.433 12.9 B I WB L 216 1770 0.092 0.122 22.7 C 38.7 D T 807 1863 1.029 0.433 48.6 E R 686 1583 0.427 0.433 11.7 B NB LTR 138 1549 0.596 0.089 30.3 D 30.3 D II SB LT 395 1777 0.608 0.222 22.3 C 33.0 D R 352 1583 0.910 0.222 41.0 E Intersection Delay = 32.7 sec /veh Intersection LOS = D II Lost Time /Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v /c(x) = 0.930 1 • I 1 II II -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/29/1995 7:26:51 I INTERSECTION: TIGARD - DURHAM AND HALL BLVD VOLUMES: EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR METRO SIZE: 100,000 TO 500,000 ANALYST: I FILE NAME: !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 90 G= 74 Y= 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D * II ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 82% * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! II ! 1 ! RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! ... .0 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! II 3 ! ... .0 ... .0 ... .0 L.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R L T R! II ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 17 27 34 78 ! 59% 59% 59% ! B B B ! NORTH ! 220 8 304 532 ! 64% 82% 82% ! B D D ! I WEST ! 176 422 1 599 ! 82% 68% 68% ! D C C ! EAST ! 19 789 278 1086 ! 25% 82% 82% ! A D D ! II APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! I W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ► ! ! ! I ! MOVE ! SOUTH APPROACH V/C VALUES NORTH WEST EAST ! LTR ! .043 .000 .000 .000 II TR ! .034 .173 .235 .296 LT ! .024 .000 .000 .000 R ! .019 .169 .001 .154 II T ! .015 .004 .234 .219 L ! 010 .126 .101 .011 ! I N-S V/C =.240 E -W V/C =.398 TOTAL AMBER =.178 MINIMUM V/C =.067 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R 1 ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 97 ! SOUTH ! 7.7 7.7 7.7 ! 0 89 0 NORTH ! 926 ! NORTH ! 20.1 20.1 20.1 ! 214 303 0 I WEST ! 1562 ! WEST ! 11.7 34.4 34.4 ! 191 327 0 EAST ! 1609 ! EAST ! 11.7 34.4 34.4 ! 21 412 0 II I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08 -29 -1995 Associated Transportion Engineering & Planning, (ATEP) I Streets: (E -W) DURHAM ROAD (N -S) HALL BLVD Analyst: DW File Name: Area Type: Other 8 -29 -95 AM PEAK I Comment: EXISTING Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound I L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- No. Lanes 1 1< 1 1 1 > 1 < > 1 1 I Volumes 2 6 3 4 55 285 35 162 Lane Width 12 .0 12.76 0 11 60 251 122 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 II Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ' EB Left * * NB Left * Thru * * Thru * Right * * Right * II Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * ' Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right I Green Yellow /AR 5.OA 14.OA 20.OA Green 20.OA 16.OA 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yellow /AR 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6 I Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS I EB L 433 1770 0.647 0.244 22.1 C 29.1 D TR 763 1857 0.948 0.411 31.8 D I WB L 98 1770 0.641 0.056 35.7 D 23.6 C T 414 1863 0.638 0.222 22.8 C R 352 1583 0.364 0.222 19.4 C NB LTR 258 1449 0.252 0.178 20.7 C 20.7 C I SB LT 396 1783 0.851 0.222 32.8 D 28.7 D R 352 1583 0.486 0.222 20.6 C Intersection Delay = 27.5 sec /veh Intersection LOS = D I Lost Time /Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v /c(x) = 0.761 1 I II II I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation I CS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 ******************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** file Name "Streets: (N -S) 79th Avenue (E -W) Durham Road Major Street Direction EW ength of Time Analyzed 60 (min) alyst DW ate of Analysis 8/28/95 Other Information EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES t wo -way Stop- controlled Intersection I Eastbound L T R Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- o. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1< 0 0 0 0 0> 0< 0 top /Yield N N olumes 9 1001 412 6 45 15 PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 t rade 0 0 0 0 C's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU /RV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 If V's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 CE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 II Adjustment Factors "Vehicle Critical Follow -up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) eft Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 fight Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 'Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 1 I I I I II ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** IL Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App SB L 52 153 > > > 194 28.9 D 28.9 ' SB R 18 853 > > > EB L 10 1084 3.4 A 0.0 ' Intersection Delay = 1.2 I I t UNSIGNALIZED - T - INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION FORM I 8/28/1995 9:36:25 FILE NAME: CITY: TIGARD ANALYST: DW I INTERSECTION: DURHAM AND 79TH ALTERNATE: EXISTING AM PEAK METRO SIZE: 20,000 TO 100,000 COUNT: TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP II LOCATION PLAN: APPROACH CODES ARE I LANE 1 2 3 4 A 4 A B B 6 I C 7 GRADE= .0% - GRADE= .0% GRADE= .0% SPEED: 35 MPH C RESTRICTED SIGHT CODE IS 2 II MINOR STREET ADJUSTMENTS - ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO I I APPROACH I A I B C MOVE AT AR BL BT CL CR I VOLUME 412 6 9 1001 45 15 PCH 10 50 17 LANES 1 1 1 I STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM C CR I CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 415. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.5 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = Ml = 684. PCH I SHARED LANE - SEE STEP 3 NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 PCH I AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A I STEP 2 LEFT TURN FROM B BL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 418. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.0 SECS I POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M2 = 778. PCH DEMAND = BL = 10 PCH CAPACITY USED = 1.28 % I IMPEDANCE FACTOR = P2 = .992 AVAILABLE RESERVE = 768. PCH DELAY & LOS = A II STEP 3 LEFT TURN FROM C CL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1425. VPH I CRITICAL GAP = TG = 6.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M3 = 142. PCH ADJUSTING FOR IMPEDANCE = M3 = 141. PCH II ' STEP 3 CONTINUED CL NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A SHARED LANE DEMAND = 67 PCH ' POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M13 = 176. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 109. PCH DELAY & LOS = D LOS C VOLUMES: LEG C ' VEHICLES PER HOUR 56. VER 03/93 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ' File Name Streets: (N -S) 79th Avenue (E -W) Durham Road Major Street Direction EW I Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst DW Date of Analysis 8/28/95 111 Other Information EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES PM PEAK Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- ' No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1< 0 0 0 0 0> 0< 0 Stop /Yield N N Volumes 22 656 1031 106 17 20 I PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's ( %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU /RV's ( %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 II CV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 I I Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow -up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) I Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 I Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 I I I I I I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection I Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB I Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1084 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 391 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 391 I Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.94 Step 2: LT from Major Street WE EB I Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1137 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 492 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 492 I Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.95 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. II of Queue -free State: 0.91 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB I Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1762 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 101 I Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.91 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.91 Capacity Adjustment Factor I due to Impeding Movements 0.91 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 92 I I I I I I I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** II Intersection Performance Summary I FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App I SB L 20 92 > > > 156 31.8 E 31.8 I SB R 23 391 > > > EB L 25 492 7.7 B 0.3 I Intersection Delay = 0.7 1 II I I II I 1 I I I I I UNSIGNALIZED - T - INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION FORM I 8/28/1995 9:37:22 FILE NAME: I CITY: TIGARD ANALYST: DW INTERSECTION: DURHAM AT 79TH ALTERNATE: EXISTING METRO SIZE: OVER 100,000 COUNT: PM PEAK HOUR TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP I LOCATION PLAN: APPROACH CODES ARE I LANE 1 2 3 4 A 4 A B B 6 II C 7 GRADE= .0% - GRADE= .0% GRADE= .0% SPEED: 35 MPH C RESTRICTED SIGHT CODE IS 2 II MINOR STREET ADJUSTMENTS - ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO I I APPROACH A C MOVE AT AR BL BT CL CR II VOLUME 1031 106 22 656 17 20 PCH 24 19 22 LANES 1 1 1 I STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM C CR ' CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1084. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M1 = 359. PCH II SHARED LANE - SEE STEP 3 NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 PCH I AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A I STEP 2 LEFT TURN FROM B BL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1137. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 4.5 SECS I POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M2 = 407. PCH DEMAND = BL = 24 PCH CAPACITY USED = 5.90 % I IMPEDANCE FACTOR = P2 = .960 AVAILABLE RESERVE = 383. PCH DELAY & LOS = B STEP 3 LEFT TURN FROM C CL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1762. VPH I CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.5 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M3 = 121. PCH ADJUSTING FOR IMPEDANCE = M3 = 117. PCH 1 ' STEP 3 CONTINUED CL NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A SHARED LANE DEMAND = 41 PCH ' POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M13 = 183. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 142. PCH DELAY & LOS = D ' LOS C VOLUMES: LEG C ' VEHICLES PER HOUR 130. VER 03/93 1 1 1 1 i a • I i . ■i 1 = = : SO CIA TED „.1 == 1IANSPORTATION 1 --I =:=,-, Fa' GINEERING 8c I ,,,,,07 _,„,:„: = m ANNING (A NEW NNW I �4 I i 1 I APP I l PROPOSED 1 LAND USE DATA i CALCULATIONS I i I I I ' AM PEAK ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION TRIP GENERATION PROGRAM PROJECT: DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION DATE: 09- Aug -95 ' . LAND USE # 520 TYPE OF LAND USE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TIME PERIOD: AM PEAK VALUE OF 400 VALUE OF 0.3 VALUE OF 0 BUS % 66.00% %IN 60.00% % OUT 40.00% EQUATION (T) = A (X) ' (T) = 120 BUS TRIPS VEHICLE TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS = 120 79 41 VEHICLE IN = 72 48 24 VEHICLES OUT = 48 32 16 1 1 Page 1 TRIP GENERATION BY EQUATIONS LISTED IN 5TH EDITION PROJECT: DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION I DATE: 09- Aug -95 LAND USE # 520 TYPE OF LAND USE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ' TIME PERIOD: OF X = 400 VALUE OF A = 1.09 ' VALUE OF B = 0 BUS % 66.00% %IN 50.00% % OUT 50.00% EQUATION 2 (T) = A (X) ' (T) = 436 BUS TRIP VEHICLE TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS = 436 288 148 VEHICLE IN = 218 144 74 VEHICLES OUT = 218 144 74 1 I PM PEAK ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION TRIP GENERATION PROGRAM PROJECT DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION DATE: 09- Aug -95 I . LAND USE # 520 TYPE OF LAND USE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TIME PERIOD: PM PEAK ' VALUE 0 400 VALUE 0 0.015 VALUE 0 0 BUS % 66.00% %IN 50.00% % OUT 50.00% EQUATIO (T) = A (X) (T) = 6 BUS TRIP VEHICLE TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS = 6 4 2 VEHICLE IN = 3 2 1 VEHICLES OUT = 3 2 1 1 Page 2 ' PM OF GEN ' ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION TRIP GENERATION PROGRAM PROJECT DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION DATE: 09- Aug -95 LAND USE # 520 TYPE OF LAND USE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TIME PERIOD: PM PEAK OF GENERATOR ' VALUE O 400 VALUE 0 0.23 VALUE 0 0 BUS % 66.00% %IN 42.00% % OUT 58.00% EQUATIO (T) = A (X) ' (T) = 92 BUS TRIP VEHICLE TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS = 92 61 31 ' VEHICLE IN = 39 26 13 VEHICLES OUT = 53 35 18 1 1 1 Page 3 I I TRIP GENERATION BY EQUATIONS LISTED IN 5TH EDITION PROJECT: DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION I DATE: 09- Aug -95 LAND USE # 520 TYPE OF LAND USE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I TIME PERIOD: WEEKDAY VALUE OF X = 600 VALUE OF A = 1.09 I VALUE OFB= 0 BUS % 66.00% %IN 50.00% % OUT 50.00% EQUATION 2 (T) = A (X) I (T) = 654 BUS TRIP VEHICLE TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS = 654 432 222 I VEHICLE IN = 327 216 111 I VEHICLES OUT = 327 216 111 I I I I I I I I I AM PEAK ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION TRIP GENERATION PROGRAM PROJECT: DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION DATE: 09- Aug -95 I . LAND USE # 520 TYPE OF LAND USE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TIME PERIOD: AM PEAK VALUE OF 600 VALUE OF 0.3 VALUE OF 0 BUS % 66.00% %IN 60.00% % OUT 40.00% EQUATION (T) = A (X) ' (T) = 180 BUS TRIPS VEHICLE TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS = 180 119 61 ' VEHICLE IN = 108 71 37 VEHICLES OUT = 72 48 24 1 1 Page 1 PM PEAK ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION TRIP GENERATION PROGRAM PROJECT DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION DATE: 09- Aug -95 I . LAND USE* 520 TYPE OF LAND USE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TIME PERIOD: PM PEAK ' VALUE O 600 VALUE O 0.015 VALUE 0 0 BUS % 66.00% %IN 50.00% % OUT 50.00% EQUATIO (T) = A (X) (T) = 9 BUS TRIP VEHICLE TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS = 9 6 3 VEHICLE IN = 5 3 2 VEHICLES OUT = 5 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 Page 2 1 ' PM OF GEN ' ASSOCIATED TRANSPORTATION TRIP GENERATION PROGRAM PROJECT DURHAM SCHOOL EXPANSION DATE: 09- Aug -95 ' . LAND USE # 520 TYPE OF LAND USE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TIME PERIOD: PM PEAK OF GENERATOR ' VALUE O 600 VALUE 0 0.23 VALUE O 0 BUS % 66.00% %IN 42.00% % OUT 58.00% EQUATIO (T) = A (X) ' (T) = 138 BUS TRIP VEHICLE TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS = 138 91 47 ' VEHICLE IN = 58 38 20 VEHICLES OUT = 80 53 27 1 I Page 3 i � amw S OCIATED 1 FrANSPORTATION GINEERING 861 ;15 ANNING (ATEP) 1 1 � APPENCIX C • � SCENARIO 2 � LEVEL OF SERVICE � CALCULATIONS • II HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08 -29 -1995 Associated Transportion Engineering & Planning, (ATEP) I Streets: (E -W) DURHAM ROAD (N -S) HALL BLVD Analyst: DW File Name: Area Type: Other 8 -29 -95 AM PEAK IF Comment: TOTAL TRAFFIC W /EXPANSION Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' - L - T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- No. Lanes 1 1< 1 1 1 > 1 < > 1 1 I Volumes 266 676 25 73 251 122 26 10 43 285 44 162 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 I Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I EB Left Thru * * NB Left * * * Thru * Right * * Right * I Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * I Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right I Green 7.OA 16.OA 26.OA Green 18.OA 8.OA Yellow /AR 3.0 3.0 3.0 Yellow /AR 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #3 #5 #6 I Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS I EB L 511 1770 0.548 0.289 18.4 C 16.3 C TR 926 1852 0.797 0.500 15.5 C I WB L T 138 1770. 0.559 0.078 29.6 D 19.2 C 538 1863) 0.491 0.289 17.7 C R 457 1583 0.280 0.289 16.1 C NB LTR 135 1516 0.616 0.089 31.2 D 31.2 D I SB LT 357 1785 0.969 0.200 52.3 E 42.4 E R 317 1583 0.540 0.200 22.3 C "Intersection Delay = 24.0 sec /veh Intersection LOS = C I Lost Time /Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v /c(x) = 0.797 I I I I -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/29/1995 7:27:44 I INTERSECTION: TIGARD - DURHAM AND HALL BLVD VOLUMES: TOTAL TRAFFIC AM PEAK W /EXPANSION METRO SIZE: 100,000 TO 500,000 ANALYST: I FILE NAME: !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE ! C= 90 G= 74 Y= 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I ************************ 1 I I I ! ! I * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D -E * II ! ! * SATURATION 86% * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! II ! 1 ! RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! ... .0 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! I 3 ! ... .0 ... .0 ... .0 L.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R L T R! I ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 26 10 43 79 ! 63% 63% 63% ! B B B ! NORTH ! 285 44 162 491 ! 86% 66% 66% ! D -E C C ! I WEST ! EAST 266 676 25 967'! 86% 86% 86% ! D -E D -E D -E ! ! 73 251 122 446 ! 61% 41% 41% ! B A A ! I APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! I W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! __ ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! ! 1 ! I ! MOVE ! SOUTH APPROACH V/C VALUES NORTH WEST EAST 1 LTR ! .044 .000 .000 .000 I TR • ! .029 114 .389 .104 LT ! .020 .000 .000 .000 ! R ! .024 .090 .014 .068 ! I T ! .006 .024 .376 .070 ! L ! .015 .164 .153 .042 ! I N-S V/C =.230 E -W V/C =.456 TOTAL AMBER =.178 MINIMUM V/C =.067 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE ! LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! I ! ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 186 ! SOUTH ! 7.2 7.2 7.2 ! 0 91 0 NORTH ! 753 ! NORTH ! 17.7 17.7 17.7 ! 286 207 0 I WEST ! EAST ! 1192 ! WEST ! 16.5 42.0 42.0 ! 272 468 0 1229 ! EAST ! 7.2 32.7 32.7 ! 84 148 0 ! I HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Version 2.4 08 -29 -1995 Associated Transportion Engineering & Planning, (ATEP) I Streets: (E -W) DURHAM ROAD (N -S) HALL BLVD Analyst: DW File Name: II Area Type: Other 8 -29 -95 PM PEAK Comment: TOTAL TRAFFIC W /EXPANSION Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound - L - T R L T R L T R L T R - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- No. Lanes 1 1< 1 1 1 > 1 < > 1 1 I Volumes 176 422 1 20 789 278 18 27 34 220 9 304 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vols 0 0 0 0 Lost Time 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 I Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I EB Left * NB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * I Peds * Peds WB Left * SB Left * Thru * Thru * Right * Right * ' Peds * Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right I Green Yellow /AR 3 1 39.OA Green 20.OA 8.OA 3.0 3.0 Yellow /AR 3.0 3.0 Cycle Length: 90 secs Phase combination order: #1 #2 #5 #6 I Intersection Performance Summary Lane Group: Adj Sat v/c g/C Approach: Mvmts Cap Flow Ratio Ratio Delay LOS Delay LOS I EB L 216 1770 0.855 0.122 43.4 E 21.9 C TR 807 1863 0.551 0.433 12.9 B I WB L 216 1770 0.097 0.122 22.7 C 38.7 D T 807 1863 1.029 0.433 48.6 E R 686 1583 0.427 0.433 11.7 B NB LTR 138 1551 0.602 0.089 30.5 D 30.5 D I SB LT 395 1777 0.610 0.222 22.3 C 33.0 D R 352 1583 0.910 0.222 41.0 E Intersection Delay = 32.7 sec /veh Intersection LOS = D I Lost Time /Cycle, L = 12.0 sec Critical v /c(x) = 0.930 I I I II I -- SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -- SIGCAP -- VERS(05JAN92) 8/29/1995 7:28:31 I INTERSECTION: TIGARD - DURHAM AND HALL BLVD VOLUMES: TOTAL TRAFFIC PM PEAK HOUR W /EXPANSION METRO SIZE: 100,000 TO 500,000 ANALYST: II FILE NAME: !PHASE !PHA !PHASE C= G= Y= !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE !PHASE SE C 90 G 74 Y- 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I **** ! ! ! ! ! ! ******************** ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SERVICE LEVEL D * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * SATURATION 82% * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * ! ! ! ! ! ! ! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** I APPROACH LANE GEOMETRY ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LANE ! MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH MOVE WIDTH ! I ! 1 ! RTL 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 RT. 12.0 ! 2 ! ... .0 L.. 12.0 L.. 12.0 T.. 12.0 ! I 3 ! ... .0 ... .0 ... .0 L.. 12.0 ! MOVEMENT VOLUMES ! MOVE SATURATION ! MOVEMENT LOS ! APPR ! L T R TOT ! L T R L T R! I ! ! ! ! SOUTH ! 18 27 34 79 ! 60% 60% 60% ! B B B ! NORTH ! 220 9 304 533 ! 64% 82% 82% ! B D D ! I WEST ! 176 422 1 599 ! 82% 68% 68% ! D C C ! EAST ! 20 789 278 1087 ! 25% 82% 82% ! A D D ! I APPR! TRKS! !X- WLK!PEDS? NO! ! PHASING ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! S ! 5.0 %! ! S ! -- ! ! ! N ! 5.0 %! ! N ! -- ! !N /S- DIRECTION SEPARATION (C -4)! I W ! 5.0 %! ! W ! -- ! !E /W -TURN PHASE WITH OVERLAP (C -3)! E ! 5.0 %! ! E ! ! ! ! I ! APPROACH V/C VALUES MOVE ! SOUTH NORTH WEST EAST ! LTR ! .044 .000 .000 .000 I ! TR ! .034 .174 .235 .296 ! LT ! .025 .000 .000 .000 R ! .019 .169 .001 .154 I T L ! .015 .005 .234 .219 ! .010 .126 .101 .011 ! I N-S V/C =.241 E -W V/C =.398 TOTAL AMBER =.178 MINIMUM V/C =.067 LEG VOLUME ! ! TIME AVAIL (SECS)! MOVE STORAGE LEG ! AT LOS C ! APPR ! L T R ! L T R ! ' SOUTH ! 99 ! SOUTH ! 7.7 7.7 7.7 ! 0 90 0 ! NORTH ! 926 ! NORTH ! 20.2 20.2 20.2 ! 213 304 0 ! I WEST ! EAST ! 1560 ! WEST ! 11.7 34.4 34.4 ! 191 327 0 1609 ! EAST ! 11.7 34.4 34.4 ! 22 412 0 ! II I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** II File Name Streets: (N -S) 79th Avenue (E -W) Durham Road Major Street Direction EW I Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst DW Date of Analysis 8/28/95 I Other Information TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM PEAK Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- ' No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1< 0 0 0 0 0> 0< 0 Stop /Yield N N Volumes 11 1008 423 6 45 17 I PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's ( %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU /RV's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 I CV's (o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 I I Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow -up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) I Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 I Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 I I I I II I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection , I Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB I Conflicting Flows: (vph) 426 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 842 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 842 I Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.98 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB I Conflicting Flows: (vph) 429 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1071 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1071 I Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. I of Queue -free State: 0.96 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB I Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1445 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 154 I Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.96 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.96 Capacity Adjustment Factor I due to Impeding Movements 0.96. Movement Capacity: (pcph) 148 I I I I I I II ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 1 Intersection Performance Summary FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App SB L 52 148 > > > 192 29.9 D 29.9 ' SB R 20 842 > > > EB L 13 1071 3.4 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 1.3 1 1 II UNSIGNALIZED - T - INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION FORM I 8/28/1995 9:38:55 FILE NAME: II CITY: TIGARD ANALYST: DW INTERSECTION: DURHAM AT 79TH ALTERNATE: TOTAL TRAFFIC METRO SIZE: OVER 100,000 COUNT: AM PEAK HOUR TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP II LOCATION PLAN: APPROACH CODES ARE I LANE 1 2 3 4 A 4 A B B 6 II C 7 GRADE= .0% - GRADE= .0% GRADE= .0% SPEED: 35 MPH C RESTRICTED SIGHT CODE IS 2 I MINOR STREET ADJUSTMENTS - ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO I I APPROACH I A I B I C MOVE AT AR BL BT CL CR II VOLUME 423 6 11 1008 45 17 PCH 12 50 19 LANES 1 1 1 I STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM C CR I CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 426. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY ='M1 = 772. PCH I SHARED LANE - SEE STEP 3 NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 PCH I AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A I STEP 2 LEFT TURN FROM B BL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 429. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 4.5 SECS I POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M2 = 866. PCH DEMAND = BL = 12 PCH CAPACITY USED = 1.39 % I IMPEDANCE FACTOR = P2 = .991 AVAILABLE RESERVE = 854. PCH DELAY & LOS = A STEP 3 LEFT TURN FROM C CL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1445. VPH I CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.5 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M3 = 188. PCH ADJUSTING FOR IMPEDANCE = M3 = 187. PCH II ' STEP 3 CONTINUED CL NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 PCH 1r AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A ' SHARED LANE DEMAND = 69 PCH POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M13 = 236. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE = 167. PCH DELAY & LOS = D LOS C VOLUMES: LEG C ' VEHICLES PER HOUR 65. VER 03/93 I I ■ I I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 1 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** II File Name Streets: (N -S) 79th Avenue (E -W) Durham Road Major Street Direction EW II Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst DW Date of Analysis 8/28/95 II Other Information TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES PM PEAK Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- I No. Lanes 0> 1 0 0 1< 0 0 0 0 0> 0< 0 Stop /Yield N N Volumes 22 657 1032 106 17 20 I PHF .95 .95 .95 .95 .95 Grade 0 0 0 0 MC's ( %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SU /RV's (%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 I CV's ( %) 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCE's 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 II I Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow -up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) I Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 I Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 II I I II 1 ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 2 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ,. WorkSheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1085 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 390 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 390 ' Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.94 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB ' Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1138 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 492 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 492 ' Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.95 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) ' Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -free State: 0.91 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB 1 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1764 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 101 ' Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.91 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.91 ' Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.91 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 92 1 ' Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 Page 3 ********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection Performance Summary ' FlowRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App ' SB L 20 92 > > > 156 31.8 E 31.8 ' SB R 23 390 > > > EB L 25 492 7.7 B 0.2 ' Intersection Delay = 0.7 1 1 I UNSIGNALIZED - T - INTERSECTION CAPACITY CALCULATION FORM I 8/28/1995 9:41:25 FILE NAME: I CITY: TIGARD ANALYST: DW INTERSECTION: DURHAM AT 79TH ALTERNATE: TOTAL TRAFFIC METRO SIZE: OVER 100,000 COUNT: PM PEAK TYPE OF CONTROL: STOP II LOCATION PLAN: APPROACH CODES ARE I LANE 1 2 3 4 A 4 A B B 6 I C 7 GRADE= .0% - GRADE= .0% GRADE= .0% SPEED: 35 MPH C RESTRICTED SIGHT CODE IS 2 I MINOR STREET ADJUSTMENTS - ACCELERATION LANE? NO CURB RADIUS OR TURN ANGLE? NO I I APPROACH ( A I B I C I MOVE AT AR BL BT CL CR VOLUME 1032 106 22 657 17 20 PCH 24 19 22 LANES 1 1 1 STEP 1 RIGHT TURN FROM C CR I CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1085. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.0 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M1 = 359. PCH I SHARED LANE - SEE STEP 3 NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 PCH I AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A I STEP 2 LEFT TURN FROM B BL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1138. VPH CRITICAL GAP = TG = 4.5 SECS I POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M2 = 407. PCH DEMAND = BL = 24 PCH CAPACITY USED = 5.90 % I IMPEDANCE FACTOR = P2 = .960 AVAILABLE RESERVE = 383. PCH DELAY & LOS = B I STEP 3 LEFT TURN FROM C CL CONFLICTING FLOWS = MH = 1764. VPH I CRITICAL GAP = TG = 5.5 SECS POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M3 = 121. PCH ADJUSTING FOR IMPEDANCE = M3 = 116. PCH 1 ' STEP 3 CONTINUED CL NO SHARED LANE DEMAND = 0 PCH ' AVAILABLE RESERVE = 0. PCH DELAY & LOS = N/A SHARED LANE DEMAND = 41 PCH POTENTIAL CAPACITY = M13 = = 182. PCH AVAILABLE RESERVE 141. PCH DELAY & LOS = D 1 LOS C VOLUMES: LEG C ' VEHICLES PER HOUR 130. VER 03/93 1 1 1 1:43 ;-� ItiW 211.1' PROPERTY LINE ` 1:4 i 'lit r 'V 47- ..... .. ..• ••.• .. :••• .. .. ... ••.• . ,. .. ...-- i 1 40 :.:\\ — , i — ,, — , \\\.:11\\,\, . s. ‘,.....................::.:...•••••. r..., , f . ,.....,...\\\,, . . • ,, ... • . • .• s . — ... i.. ni r g i r- t. i.,:. if x , : pl 11 f tf e 0 g . Sib o � I / ► R s d" as G. a - 0 � ♦ ♦♦ Y ♦ ♦ ♦ / • • • • . v x e D CD ii 'y : • ;7 <40 . ,..': co . L ii vitt t11 his • .�►•• . 1 * ( � ., $i ♦ , `� �� .; • 441,54.....inolefottr '''..' ::?:>: /7 /. :: II 1 %% ;4 gt sft r , y,;<>/;;; .- � ' � ® ® ♦ ..•.• ♦ � • ..... 41 41 ter_ gi ‘• I , PROPERTY LINE \ .p o. I fl ' \ \ \\,\..•,.,.\ 1 , ____________ , \ . ti, \ L ; . \'' 0 It --4 v ,I t____ __ 7 _______________ o I 246.61 - a sl 33 .. toisc3 • k ti, f ________i . 7,6 • \ K ' . \.- \\ `... C' t t . 8 .. ..-______...-v . . __,,,, A , •.• •.. 4 it VI ' ' - ii . 'I: III P'L.___ ittp,„,,,,, MN .. 1 * ' 0. " P il / o iifilis 1� / / • .1 A RI O Ai � I I ) 1 .i I o 6 M P _ a g ri I V V J ia _� tip _ 242.61 PROPERTY LINE — A — _ �� OINIMMI WAY - 713.1' - - LINE SW DURHAM ROAD _ X41 g ADDITIONS AT DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL sELIGLEE /RUEDA �Rdd!llRllOID £R;0BS? C T• a PLANNERS !TORO , NINON ,PROPOSE® SITE PLAN as aw an ew.t Raoul soy - Portland. Oregon 971104 (003) eII4 -0173 . .. . • sl • iti orn .rn -4 x •x .— ' g At41. 5 1112 ' 11. A 1 4 1. ,- -.. - - - A 2ma • m -x, k A . 11111111211 )i. -. M ittiteremyes.) VI Nip. ,, ■Iur„...- mplawravisr,t,' -; m 1 N ...- N X 11 :: / -------- .... . ■ . •. .., 0 a ,,,..,. :A oft, illiE ,..--________. ________ ......._........... ...... ..... - - il0 / 3:4 0 ./ .---- • ,„, • i - g;tii --1 6 - m I .. "."_......... -- • i 6 6 "U I , • WIrlOt r- ,..„.„://,(=, • ,.. ./. • ./..„, . ,../..,„ , 1 A nIttp4 > ;- / .... /../...• /.„. • , v, Z I ' /, • , / / ,.., " ><,/,,..., , - x ., .1 . ... , • ' .y>/: . I : . • ... Y A " ', . • ' ' . / - .. • . / ' \ \ • ''' t •,. • . / .. / .1:1 ././ . \ \, s y . T1 .. 7 P. '< k\ '',,\///, % • 1 1;Z: . , \ * \:X., •.. • s .. ' , • . X:// • "*. .' , • <'1. A \ • • .//..;.•' I • . / / - / v ) , :,, \ \ XX. • ., \ >.(y/ •••,, ,.,•• ,..• .: . 1 I ' • "..?,';: \•c;:• ' !: ../ / s • . ..,'•)/.... ), j.., /• ./2 //%,.: I . : 1 : '5;)e \ ''\ )'*.. I • ',,,), ' >.(> : . ,.•';', ., : i t t I . '': ' . „/\. \':- . / . \ v •s. ://,/, A:, • . 4,, .)\../ ,X • • \ AX7/,'..... • I 4 ! • II 1 : , ,' , ‘..`e/ /x: >(,< ,\?< .. 4/ \ • , . \ sy lit • I - ii 2 , .....„.:..., :..., v • • • . . • .. •• ........,......... • . 1 ii.,....,....... • 11 -wittt:'..: , ‘ -, prt-in, 1 246.61 PROPERTY LINE ' 0. 1 .1. ./ .44-:" A 1 All i I r % I ; OMNI OMB li it i \ . r, X ipir 45 O. 1111 ,.....••■• ■•••■ .... ■■■•••■ ..■ .■.■ .... .■■■•■• ■ ...■ ■.■ ' , . r.s.. 1 SAAIOAAD I ii#A. II It / “■■■■•■ .■ r ___ , ____ ____, , i I I o I , /., 1 I ti _ .10 , 1 . 1 ,... / I • , ,s, 4„ .1 , • • , „., . 1 — ili 7 ir 911 1 7 '4' il t 61 1 ir 1 I I II 1 t 1144646_ CCM . ! /. • : 1 1 II' Iii, -, .. • , m A Ei is JIIIIII1 lila /__ / / / 11 ii . . . , /, . c. / / I H , -- _ _ _ I - i in r--, E.r. H ... . I I 1 .... • .. . tO 'II • u i . x. P li i Li ./ . gii mill • . / .'/ >' ..!' . \ ce ;,;, . • . . , i 1 / --\ 1 '.1 '. IN: . 11■: ;.. ) _..1 co I I ,, . _ II • ; (il s ;) A 242k1 PROPERTY ROPERTY LINE _ _ '',UNIIMIIIIIi■-■111111 ..... f4..._, 213.1' --- • - - LINE ,-- SW DURHAM ROAD II • Ca 1 1 ADDITIONS A T DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SELIG/LEE/RUEDA 411.31110111ITECIT• 6 PLANWIla• • ate e.w. Mb Street Room ROI. — Portland. °Moo g 7004 OM 0 24 - 0173 PYIST. SITE PLAN • .________ •. .. • ! . • a ro eo a I• . ao . ., o . I NEW ADDITION • I , 1 / r I 1 \/ / 1 �� 1 1 V / , � _M EXIST. BL �a u ,��y, 0 , ,, r a —1 A s 77= ■ I / I % i � �8 7 Ai „pi i . / _ + i \ . / a,” /\ ' , 1. IA..i / , , / \\ % ." / i ,,,f , ' �M i r / � / \, 1/ / _R: W4 I , MB iX \ / , b , aj . ... / /, .1 • / / c , . , . . \ , , ` COVERED WAUC -, i r ......... a - _ . \. s 1 r . 71, 7 ( l _ , 1 ) i ` '• . i % I ' •,, 1 \ / • Frj! r COVERED } r-Ce-2,---1 I : 1 /; / 1 ,i� \ rt . PLAY / 1 � \ `mo � ' / / < s. I ! „,./: I _ I ' Iii= ,, , 1 H i I i ' :> L L 'left \'-' i 1 T ____ � • ! \ t �r— •- r ` Z NEW ADDITION NORTU a o� E> PLAN �, CC 1 . 1 .4 P•40' Ai O F .>:. \ \• INDICATES EXISTING BUILDING 23,830 SF EXISTING BLDG 39,135 SF ADDITIONS CU • 62,965 SF TOTAL BLDG . .O m .O .O .• o m O i► �JlI . • Q Q _. __, _4„, B . B 14 ..... ,. 1 „...._, i 0 . — pivot a .... -.... 5 .5_,. Ill k ..__. a taM kilreia Imo E 13 — 6L III / i -s i E D l 11 -- _ tib i lk 1 * 1 ill IP 4 > , I : ll'ial S g E • g "----...,.... II MO M OM NA ra I - c4.4 3 t 1 • / ! , E , E . r S i'..E c-ll IIIIIIIIII I L'` ai ' • a i, Z i� -2:.:--11-_=..--: i .=r III _ ....__ .._ , ..:. ........ .... ... _ it n 1 e� I i 11:-. il 0, I , �, -_9 _ / i 1 1 i IA = 1 i li 14i ■ . i _ '1 ...____L w O ____ 3 _ ....=- i WSW r am UI E' a 3 1 2 g ADDITIONS AT DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SELIG /L.EE /RUEDA 10 .W. R ~PAN LO • k A a O! i Z O t• ft ! L K M a• W , BUILDING ELEVATIONS .ty... gab OW30. "Om °°t — PY3'•130, 01804 (100) 104_01 / • • • • \ . . . . • Ilk • ...... . ..... ..... .......... . ... . . . . • . • • • . . . • . • COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684 -0360 Notice TT 8 3 3 2 BEAVERTON. OREGON 97075 • :. -. -- - - v .`: ��;:=-'-'� - - "-- •-'' + Th e following wi ll be cons by,the'1igard Heari Offcer_on Mon -., Legal Notice Advertising r day, October 23.1995; at 7:00 P M: at and Civic•Ceri = �'ibwn Hall,: • 13125 S.W. Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oie'on ; Both u bhc, dr`al and written' • City of Tigard - testimony is iavited.'Ihe'public�h' on ahis nila a t tter �cn .� ll bb-conducted 1312 5 SW Hall Blvd. • ❑ Te arsheet Notice `in accordance.with the rules Chapt 18 32 of tlie`Tigard Municipal' `Code; and rules and procedures bf the Hearings Officer. Failure to raise an' • Tigard , Oregon 9722 3 - 819 9 • ❑ Duplicate Affiday. .issue.in person or by letter accompanied by statements or evidencesufk, dent to allow the hearing's authority and all parties to.respond"precludes` . . • Accounts Payable —Terry • ran ap al ;'and failure specif 'the'criterion' from,the,.'Cnmmuiii y . .. - .ay. txt t -,.�n� r ac.r ri:lY H -�:. +?�t�• "� .a 1e1" 7.� Deve1opn€iWCode orromprehe"lis�e Phan •at ►hieli a,comm�ent is� ' d eted udecles an ple `basodkii . { R t .a 1 :, (lti'a'tfcn�otiirth gn�ahola, imay' l e obtained, fro (th *Planning -at'= 13'125 -S W:- 'Hall= Boole gard, Oregon 97223 or by callmg 639.4,,, : ._ u AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION -- 4 ,. _ `' 7 • PU e' • I I G' 04 ,� -r a . - ? , 1. - . : STATE OF OREGON ) s - ' �._ -. ` - % + ° COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) ` L - 9 : jt$. • u1 .M • - I I) t•' LI .. .w:, - „ , 4 ti „ 7 = ' ; I. .Ti�A; th KnPh 1 er SENSITIVE• LANDS RBVIEW'(SLR1195�001d ; .` � '; : ?, •.. being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising _ a ' ;The aFplicant has: :approval "ofthe.following developipent a p = Director, or his a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 s principal clerk, of them; ga rA -m1,a 1 at- i n mimes ` plicauons.;l :o atReir ewwap' vsl:to constniCt a build :: - - g;16 wiif;�� it ` � ti ent tool _ ^a i ` and 193.020; ,�+ Y�P� P..1. dn2 :j Sensitiv ds, published at Ti T; a rA �" =•' �° " am g . w- P 3 in the ` °Revie. toil tlie' � tton ��ormdramegesy ° the aforesaid county and state; that the ' '' :' a x `'s•° s•I` Hear; SnR 9 5 —n n 1 41 • ►e_arigiod�pp_�_ulnn , �e ari • , I) .areal. CAT�O.�f272 B rig = /ST.R 95 —n l l Rnn; -a rtr. , ;R . i/CT 2B71.a •` .' iON g�"12(Resid.: 2'W iits` e printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in thAepts - "° a _R . "'' K ' .�- � ' •acre): e � . � attaclied/deiachedtesiden w... J ' (. M Kr• A VY. l • ent issue of said newspaper for nNF successive and - n Y ita m)illip s d ents ititlts,residential:virei facilities 41eih riie:parks as utid vision = ttbhc ntiport seiliiaesj1familY consecutive in the following Issues: •: y t'lefit>:ul frier str ' _ , • Octob er 12.1995 '` : en Code'.S t ons - _ :54'1884 18 ' ° 811 18102j 8 0 `18:1 pp-- Q8;i l$: 16; • 18:12(1 181 0 a edrl 8 014., . *. ! r *'.: ` • • • _1 - ; J - 9 ' . 1' r� C j TIT US �� ' + - : ." ,:.._. .z:CO17D ONAI:` SE P RMIi' • i • . _�,,: - < " � i;;, ° s' ; i �; � i ' DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXPANSI �4A>:request=for conditional - ,iuse:per tapprova�l to;eapand.. - e, Durham :>:El s denttc pacify of 600:studenis The tatal•e;XiA ' insion:us 39,135`s oars feet:.L OCATION '8048;S:W Shaffer ane' • Subscribed and sworn to be ore me this 12 th day of October, 1' ' i(WCTN1'2S.1t13BA'and 13B, to ,lot X400- and >300)` `-ZONE R- 2� _ (R e - ' - ac re) : ill 12 / s idential, 12unitspe allows single family at= v nl��� �'7 " tactied/detached residential: units; m ulti p le_ zone, faInhiy residential" units. Notary Pubic fo Oregon . ` residential care facilities mobile home parks and subdivision public" sup- iL !1 - Ur ra r' c"�-er'r?� e' ,f wa,:. -M: -- .. o-. My Commission Expires: �. Porl s ervices. fatimily, care; home u tidA; t°ernp iitr f use`;resider - ; _ � ppaa tial fuel tank, and `accessor uses 'such as elementary. AFFIDAVIT • hools`are also pernuttedWithin. the R 1 2 .'zoning subject to condt� ti , 'tsc tional use permit approval: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA Corn -' :- munityDevelopment :Code,Chapters 18.96; .18.100, 18.106; - ' . . , ';18108,18114• 15116 ` - 18:130 - ,.150, and 18 LL .,. .'. "�''.'"i ., @-- .yam _ k- 18 �, _ � ^ %t:: "; .»rte ♦.' <a • w • 12 • . Publish eidOl er 12;:1995. • 4�, 7833 .-� - „.. ^y r . •1�......c- _; -- ._. -'L-.- -: -. -- + �+ - _ ' • • ' • • 0 • • • 00 q 40 40 p O 0 70 • p NEW ADDITION 7 ' / 4411! • in „ __ A q A . 11 / ; ✓« . /EXIST. BLDG. a�i I ileg °P / ,.... • 11 r 111 • r \ , ..... \ . (/) 4 a I x . - . . lig _ . " . ''' ' ' / / ' ' Niiiii \:, , , , • ., .. .Thil"malla 4 et Is I . 3. � � %1 I I —T —, �r - - .- - - - r --. - I in • Ilh �aaa��w ■.s. Y ��1/ I I r J ; ;, � /� I COVERED . : • • - • rtjl /. al d PLAY I 4 • • . / I MF z---(\_.--.---, --� t LI ! ■ ICAMIlill i . . , - • /./. : i \ ` NORTH a NEW ADDITION d E)) . • PLAN cu.4 1.-4°' X141 INDICATES EXISTING BUILDING ^.�' 23,830 SF EXISTING BLDG 39,135 SF ADDITIONS CU.4 62,965 SF TOTAL BLDG . .e to in u .n o m o . 474r2s1� . 40 cPm wm 1 rn „ ars 1 t., ;X X "X A A • � A l j� 1 1. ' - - •• - ¶ �! l �:t► � RIt _ 53r 1 L llifErW�'1i! 0 0) t 1 ,, - 6g 4 (p ••' p4t i- s. I ' g m �I . .- q '--•'• -- f ,) %%J 4 •� ,� ",• �:, ;, i I4 t I % /✓'. , // / /,'' , „, ':.. \ < fir'` -. . ,, =.•, `C •s. �'' ' \ � � ' ` � ` \ ` y /<. . 4i. .. \ `' J\ / r, ./.... / r_ ,:, i ip 2 V . I . ` >. ,, Y i ! 1 , .. % • . I I \�: :< 11 r li \ .`:. • o O Po _ 1 ,0,,,,.,,,s,; ___________________ ...,, 24661' PR�RTY LINE X 1 - , ., �._Ta.;� r , i i .., , . I I— l'it' j ° 1 r...."'! 2.3 @aO IP 1(414 I 1 I I I hF I'' '} !� i i I ' ;"t' • 11 (1) I , • � , ! I it . I r x� I 1% : il . '7. 1 1 :11 1 1, 1 S ti i I m .© ,.. / .1 el 11 I Ei / ( ll�ll�El 11 ry - AI I 1 . • „ N 0 -...41 CP . , / . / .. . , . • : . m • 14 „„ , , , ..., . • 1 ,. )il• i / '':: .. ":. Ei iii E , ..,. , ,, , .. V L � y/ `/ • i III r c'k`. D() .. re.) . ,, 0 ,, 6 . i i ill 242k1 PF�Of'ERTY LINE .� ' � A — — 1111111 213.1' ---• - - LINE --ZA) ____ SW DURHAM ROAD • II n ADDITIONS AT DURHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL S ELIG /LEE /RUED A - At�llsJtLll� £sonar oT• r PLAxxa11 MI II. T. Mb Street Mom ROt - Portland. Oren, 07104 (eoa) 114 -03 73 I.-. FYIST. SITE PLAN - __ - ill 0 • • / METAL ROOF OVER / COVERED PLAY / EXIST. BLDG. srram 1111151l 11 . i / .. t Ell 1 'WALL L IGI-IT rflo. ri) NORTH ELEVATION CU3 1. 4:1 PRIEM METAL COPING - TIP ids/ • I CLAD 1 PENTVICUSE .....„,00111111 STUCCO i ....j; • i METAL SIDING 0 i -----7 1 , fi, •411,10 .. ".----. • Iiii'Vit illibLiv.ift _tr 7. I '..--- ..?__. 7__1_.. __.. _ : _. . • I tencc° L... : -II-- -- --A711 - 71 1 11111101- ill • •111111 - 11 II . .. . _ Mai "-----, STUCCO / T11 fia : 1 111ALL L IGI4T6 / I Mk EAST ELEVATION CLL3 I'- 1 II • i 14° • ...4 d V141 , . METAL CLAD MECH. *4 V PEN 'NOUSE 0 - 1 1 ri Thti' N11111111111111 1 ,----eauccc 1 ■ cn ---___H _ 1_ •-:i. [ r 1 \ WALL LIGI4113 ' • 3 SOUTH ELEVATION rrp. 1 4 cua Nur 03 1 4 Z i . 2 - - i „COVERED WALK . I g > cl Ul i.:IIHTI 7:1).] • i 1 1110 .1 Ivoil11110,1,,,I' ; ....._ I . --r -- _ • i -- . -11 i • __. , .i.i.,,,,,„....Eir lel HI ijal Ill 41 r 1 ail ..! lil , ' " , hil 03 ; .. 1P.214TiLWFRiag2 EA:Jo , , _ 1 _ _ _ . Pi 6.44 W I! ____! _ _ = 1 , 1 , i El r T TM 1 - . . -- -- 1 ,r - !: --- n - 1 - 1-1 ---- .. . -- Hi-n---- . T------i• til2 .- 4 WEST ELEVATION Ild i 9 SIM. C l IIR C1.1.) CU. 31 .. " r; . XI5T, TREES TO \ • or..., : e i, 15: 4345' PROPL.. r T L ' _ I AM - T T F. - _ - i ... ... ... _. -: A . . . P 41 1 1 I 4 .1 X I I • a OHM alle fk 1 1 m O e . 0 44 • C � • . : a >, �� s 1 �� .. ° .___.0 '\' \ \ ^ Ns' r i a p6i • • . , \>.....\\K • \.\:.,„ • I , /• . 66 EXIST. PARKING SPACES I i 1 411 0 . NEW , - -,- N .x ),\ , ,t § g i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i Q i 31 0 Ili 71 . 1 . bc•rnotsi %\,\ 'i.c \)>\.„ *, ,),' 0 LQ: � I i t N \ r ♦ I , , / / ` ♦ ��S j / 7/,,,,„,,, / j % . % % yCw \ _ _ r a / / , / ♦♦ I ♦ ♦ ♦ " /� I= PAYED C ARBACsE I �r`' I Cr 4 / j / / #. ♦ ♦ • ._♦ / ♦ •♦ � / // ; / / /ADD ' 1 / / i / PL AY . : "♦ ENCLOSURE p . • • / j / ' / S - AVED WALK i / ' / / / "// , 7 e • 1 • i I I0' SEII�R EAbEf'tEM ` ® �!t►� / F aval I T a EXIST. % / / / - I JAMES 1 AIJDREY CASTILE ► O 5.411 Vix .. ** -- •• • •• - -.- -- :lli.o....••••••_jm / /, 1111W,A 2 EXIST.�! - - - - C/1 ST • . -. .. . ;r--- E50' '-� 434 - - -• - - LINE S -- NEW EXIST. - • VEL DRIVE ..1 GROUND COVER NEW NEW . - • VEL FIRE EQUIPMENT I GROUND ?� WW V COYER Z � � ( I w Q 10 7 i - � NORM I 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN w -L1-2 1 `Q I AREA ADDITIONS ■ 39)35 SF ` .p r I ` `~ Q AREA OF EXISTYs ■ 23,830 SF I L - - ` AA TOTAL LDG 62,65 Sf i r Q LOT SIZE: 8A8 A I I O PAVING: 69298 SF + 4000 SF (NEW) I ( Q E " ii • LANDSCAPE 26f01 SF (218281 SF AFTER NEW ADDITION) i i I I is PARKING: Q a EXIST. 66 SPACES _ - - - - - REGDs 50 STAFF x 15 • 15 SPACES au-s NOTE: STORM WATER TREATMENT OPTIONS - - - UN - - - ARE DER INVESTIGATION. — — — — l.' RT7f LINE o er�e NW 1/4 SECTION :3 T2S R I W W.M. 2S I I3B WASHINGTON (^ONTY OREGON! SCALL: 1 =200 ' SEE MAP 2S I 12CC II 12 I/4 SEC. COR p� 1 I i � OLIJ HWY 2I ( ?�J.W. T DURHAM T R ROA T r106S \ 90 -18100 , 036335 91 95030647 m �— I 123 __,11 I i z 4s 13ol 600 300 20 14 70 I 600 � I I /MAC. 700, 701 , 800 , 900 C I 5.59AC. I CANCELLED TAX LOTS 0 600 AC. n 4V0 0 ' N 9 BA C N I 100,101,200,201,202,1100, M1 600—MI I ouRHA ELEMENTARY 12 00, 1 300,1400,1500,1000, to co SCHOOL - - I 2000, 2100 2101 2 401, J I C `I ' SL ---i 1r, W 7 3 5 6.5_ �I . m 209 of p, Q Q N I Q 7 V ? dI 1`,7 ., in to ce �o F J N i m V = a ' 2 0 9' I> 142' 85' -i �..I45 273.7' I : I� 30 I i 511.5' _ _ 650' — I SEE MAP I I 2S I I3BA (C.S.No 11251) N 1 ' N M I I 9, SEE MAP I I k — — — 650' — — -- I30 — — 273.7' 25 I I4A " \ 874.5' I— in 2 3 M co ® � JiH --.1 /. - 20' 5 ^*;., 1 t' 9 u 1 r+ I \� 1 1 • 1 1-_ 1 FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY e iljfk l � J � ' 0 DO NOT RELY ON FOR ANY OTHER USE �� e y i 0 Cn AC' 23 SEE MAP -,.. 2S I I3BD `�� W 'III. ga 2200 ® 0 O /7.9BAc. Z R EE _K — � x WASH iiV . , - NTy _ - D E 1 ".1. T . r, . , / i A:J.) i'a:+_ _...1 1 T N. ---) I/4 SEC /� %� F���" F4� 1k'r �*+, WI COR. c� \ I . � w f 1322.4' s ' -J ..--) SEE MAP - ®® /� AA 2S I I3CB DURHAM TIGARD . 2S 1 138 __ NE I/4 NW IA SECTION 13 T2S RIW W.M. 2S 1 13B/ j WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON SEE MAP SCALE 1 100 2S I I2CD �, I TERM o C R. 23 ° S W 1 T - - T T I v APPROX. 1 11 M 1069/33 / (CR. 23- NO WIDTH STATE ) 1/4 COR. 4`0'� c 1I� , 9503064E S 8931 58" E ` 1 . 20 20' 300 .9/ AC. L69 /69 AC. ' ?F O / , SEE MAP CANCELLED TAX LOTS V 2S I I2CD 1 100,1200,1300, 1400, 1500,1600, 4J1 �y jj 1700, 1800, 1900,2000, 2100, 2.62 AC. ^ 4 M CO N CO Q _ !� N ID O o Z 4 sit r0R /, {y 0 < / m Ss?.. /30 "0 I . F h Kio SEE MAP li I ° it 2S 1 I3AB h�q ST S 84 50 W 2 /j e0 ) 120 364.50 J '400 I /o. 58Ac. I 100 -yJ K Ira ;0' �, 3.58 AC. 4.r J 3 / ?0 4 ��, S , s0s o - ik Oa, id I '� 1_2( 242.67 N O 305' I 5 0' SEE MAP ■ 25/ AC. EAST 2S I 138 1 1 �- 149.30' _ ___I 23 pL E 11 �Zg8 0 .../ + 1 ? h p in d 2 02/ 0 �, 5 Q SEE MAP 1 d / �, � ` .'�' � 2S I 13AB 1 U nj \ - p / ¢ n M O tAV ' 1.1'x. N rV► 23.7 0 - 9 \.- w0' F P - . s \I _g,L i' ".— INITIAL POINT f 305 VACATED TAMANAWIS SUBDIVISION 3 0 ` N 0 600 s o m e 6 � ° v / ' 1000 a FOR ASSESSMENT 4.23 AC. �\ ° � s �� a M M Z s5 f 2.7 /Ac. PURPOSES ONLY P -.c \\ , ' a FOR ANY OTHER USE co V- 0 800 0 T � 2.77 AC. cn a 3 NI m X 2 0 O\ ' r f 6°j i ti co y a y e N tom. m \e O O ° 5\ N i aa , p 0 ij Z O Q V gyp c7, > 700 Z ° I— > � A) i .. . - 7 I _ 2.80 AC. R . 3 . • r•, ,t1.4 L " f_ ry ,t o v J Q N O. N O ! - 5 0 . ' FOR pits- w 1 't y o n gym►$ N 274.53' \CI 28170' O U w \\ N 89 50' E 40' z CO cc : G) U 5 `" SEE MAP 900 C 2S I I3AC a. LO ) "1":"."1 co ., 23 „..... a ,, ,^ T I GARD S <,9 33' E V J SEE MAP .19.90' 16' R/W _ 203.60 205.40' 2S I l3BG - - - - 1 - — — — — - , - -- e 0 DURHAM 2S I 13B4 SV%' I/w SV■' I/ SECTION 12 T?S R IVY' W,M. 2 I I2CC WA COUNTY OREGON SCALE I 100' CANCELLED TAX LOT NUMBERS 2001,101, 4100, 3600, 103, 1803, 1802,900,300,301,400,500,600, 800, 1500,700,1000, SEE MAP ..74 2S I I2CB I I 6800 60' 7 I I .04 Ac. ° �� 6700 • 109.76 S •08 AC. LA ' 48.94 44' 44 44 44 44 49 45' 42' 44 44' 44' 42 44 44 2 93'79 5B 'lie 588°42$1'' 91.01 1_ m I000x 10100 1 02 0 0 I030g 1040C 10500 10600 4 " 10700 10800 10900 1 1000 1 1100 I1200 1 1300 I I • • - -- - - N89°56'E ° 106 3000 2900 2800 w. 3 o 0 45 n N m 3 6 0 37 m 38 ti r 39 40 41 r 42 43 0 44 45 46 p 200 , �" '° o a m 32 n m 33 34 35 m m m ° m m m m I /3A C. m n r r ' m r\ `I r r r r r_., ,. N _ 3.97Ac. I W 93.7E • 58 0, 57 0 56 u, . t",.1- 33.67 44' 0 44' 8 44' 0 44' 0 4 _33.1 C ' S �Q `` 28.90 0 42' ° 44' 44' 0 44' a 4 0 44' ° 4 M I07 9 s 2856 \ ( � S.W. LANGTRE { E STREET I m 'BAc. X 3100 .,0- • ,, 2500 - - p0 �f - -° o - o ' , S o_ , . o a { ' O � I < 93.76 62.04 ..1 R = 50 • 75 S r i 38.36 47' 47' 47' 47 47' 47.01 47 47 47 :; 33.29 - qh p 79.10 1' I e' 9800 9700 9600 9500 9400 9300 9200 9100 9000 81)00 8800 's -11500 1 04 32000 & 2600 9900 8800 LlJ 9 47 o . /2 A c. ° m M N 60 o 54 ' N 31 0 30 29 28 27 26 0 25 °- 24 23 22 2I o 20 co m 11600 m 63.78 I 0.1 R =2 0s s :=20 89.56 r ` /\ (� r, m Z N 48 N I 3300 M 50 0 2500 Nee ° a3'a" w r . 1', 1 �7 p ° M a 105 a \/' 61 °C7 Cr) 53 a ` 54.08 47' 47 47' a7' 4T 2491 22.10 69.10 47' 47' 47' 41' 50.46 09Ac. 4 `\ 96.46 w 95' ° a 1 1700 a ! w • ---\-, 98.32 v N 88.05 e 105' 100' 40' 60' 8000 8100 v E7OO v ''l ' 49 ' W • 93. 78 3400 M ' C x2400 e e9 13300 13400 13500 13800 19 1 ,, o I 0 B o �,, "" - o ,- 52 ,6.12' f N1320_0 `' m `' . I 4119. 10 1 1 3 -0 o - 6 o 50 Q' I o 93.78 • - -- • • - ,'--'- / 0 7 J 3 _\ i \ 1 J /� 1 s6 v 18 a e I 109 35 r M 2 300 N r N , r \� N o o N N j 51 .n / 8200. 11900 a ° •') -.-•-' 63 0 �, z / 25 2? 33.63 9Q 62.32 25' 39.23 S m f' v 51 a I //Ac. 93 \ _ � _ _ n �$ o p. • 37 50.32 • ' 2 9 14 > 00 v 84.4 - '102.67 f '6 ^ . 13600 13700 ' 4- • �, a 17 v r 110 Iv 3601 U - 200 2200 M 45' 45' 13100 vc / co q- o / ^ II 0 12 M 0 94 .99 ,� 95 -C a I200C 3 a ! v . /OAc. " h 64 ° 50 6 n W R =50 -4- m a �� J C 8300 I., 4 00 o C v 52 c a (C 21,152) 92.0 p . 94.26 / o_ 6 m m 4 , 1,, , p, 7 0- 2, \6 15 ° 16 , M N ° I m • / a m 3 i p Q' 40.53 40.53 20 ,e4 (n 17 81.55 79.10 's O + j Q I2I00 y M n ! // C. ,0 7 0 6 0 0 �� a 2100 L :. { 5 49 c. / n1 95.32 � 'B / 1 v y I rr� • n 1 1 2 . 24 • i 1-- / N z 2S 2 S• \f. 1 1 BONAVENTURL 2 LN. , 12200 z 93.78 _3 800 '�� 5° p J ° ,\ u , O Z i - f } 13000 �26 yy �.', 2 s o 54 I o 112 > • C. +a F i ., n 12900 12800 12700 1 2-600 4°id 7900 ( 7800 77O) m 7�500� P` \6 ?p , ,,�,, ,, I // °; „ • '� 12 66 c c , .4 S+ 1.• • .r. 111', .� . f N - y f y : L Q ' I Q. �'" 11 a IV V' Q sv o j M 304 m m /4AC ° b T f Q � � + I '� 12400 I • 1 � 3O : e � ' / � J 9 / INITIAL PT. 1 � w� 6.9 57.�� 58' c J 55' v 7 v a g: - 6 5 7 .11 5t' se' I s5 ' v o 44 . q\ 1.. a t •a S. '1_ - � _ I f ' w 7. S 1 Y. s ° 9 5' 114 0 -- �4000 ° e h a ' � n I R� 2� 359 I "yB . Ac. v M 4400 82 7400 r) Vi ° 12500 � ° Ll68 1 5 ' SEE MAP r . R=I6' ° - N . 6 57 < 100 4101 t 4501 4500 2S I 1200 SEE MAP 1100 ' 9.06 360 m " M 2S 1 I IDD J -- 2./5 Ac. r 78 ° O O o N 7 ;o0 ` ". r I p. /OAc. a in 69 n •� n 73N n w O 1; 5 M \ m 93 76 96 -0--- 1.5' o so a m o ° SW. PAT LN. 4779 52 9O • - -- i - iict m o "1 X 0 3 7200�s e s 7 , z2 a 54' '- ( 6600 102 :- °n 42700 n N 46 7 N n N N N I a 4 h 7100 3p7o 6900 • r co 94 '2 ` l2Ac. o 9� o so _ 91 T o 0 ��? 7000 1--1,-, - ° m 4300 o �' N 4700 0 S.W. z I Lc> I- 3 2 m I \I / 71 0 U) , 75 �. 1l� N 207 7 32.88 106.22 54.50 54' c°z N 88 °42' 51" W ° 48.55 4 n 80.1 R_1 \ / J, 10 / 81.78 in .. AVON °C 15' 359 N 69 ? 5fi E C L V " ` R • �/ 238. ` tJ 1- "40.51" /; B O N D O V STREET H 2090 150 150 150 ��9ha n n 17n1 a 6500 R = " ' '1> h t X90 F S4 54 54 26.62 = s2e4 �7- 1 200 1400 1600 na 93 N_� 31 55 42.2 M n.49 / 5200 5100 5000 4900 Zs • R =204°" 1 5400 M / 4800 -' 86Ac. /.34Ac. 1.29 Ac. /./ 5.4c. 121.77 L 5500 X5300 3,, 26400 Ct 5600 n - m m N 92 n : N 84 m 83 m 82 co ,' O 6r 0.18,-, 79 78 77 76 m ^ w 0 122 .16 10 \ _� 8I I' z N 88° 42'32 ° W 45 3 0 N 0 o r \.., -- N o a m 6300 • 61' S5' 54.80 51' 54 54 54 4 54 ° n n 91/ - 50 - 57 • w ig 1 2 2.50 8 5 '� n - ° +• - � 1900 2 L 20 0 r- ,.- w ,.., ,n 6200 - N P CO - {,�', 1 18. 7 _ f v o .0 (C.S.18081 i n 90 �` ` � g4 5888.<61•4; t /2 /Ac. /.03Ac. or E- o ° 1006a - In 89 300 - - - a% ONLY. DO NOT RELY ON FOR irsn , - I I `v 100 43, 62.4 `% 6 • 73 Ac. I e(9 3 '0 ' - 5900 ANY OTHER USE. O 1 BO L. _ 6' m • lo 0 1700 1800 18041 187:3Q'..914:41' ,90 87 0`°' � ° . /8Ac. o o .!6 Ac. / 4 Ac. l m .15Ac. ; . ° 88 -- - / • o o m 60 d b ti 1 / Q' ?ti - I 150 ° 55.39 1 53 I 57 57. 71.82 B,� 20 15 0 80 N8 56'E N 89 56'E r.'" 6 91 46267 70 k 114.53 83 -5471 200 170.8 i ` "6 v We' 295 1 C ": A. S.1( ". _1- -'- l 0 J_ DURHAM _L 1 ROAD -Is • (c.R.23 NO WIDT' STATED) (OLD STATE HIGHWAY 217) , . -------444) 13 _._ ._• . SEE MAP 2S I I3B . , TIGARD 2S I 12CC __ eo \ 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 .. - , , 1 ' 1 I EXIST. TREES TO I - EMAIN - TYP. 154' 15&' 150' 434.5' PROPERTY LINE , ' EXIST, \ Ir"•••• . saese - -----( ... , COIENIMIND 119/11811•110 a /52 , • _ 1____________I ______r,„.„ 1 17 _ ORMILMIIM AP 0 / e) ' ■ " T i I ' 2F5 , -■ C E -. -, 1 STORM ! , , ,, , F (''' '9-61:m5')/ 9f5- /Ilk ).., / - /. iN ; ,,,,, , i , 1 • VEE".? _WALK • ....._---------.. ri. ,-,...._ .5. ©----- , A - -- Iii sh.)...4. _ NEW - _ --, \ - ----- GROLII D k --- CAi \ ..... i I 0 .. 1.4 I COVE' \ VSs/ - `k .1 : I -,-77;-- I 4 - 4 \ . / / 7 EXST BLDG I I / ' . / ' --- _ . __, , - , \ _ - U (16 . _ , ...- - ,...--4 . ,, \ \ _ ■ 7 " ) ) \ : ) ° C o CA _ 1 --, f I-1 4 0 , Aintr' ts) I _= J ........... „ , . . , . . , • , iz- i.,, 6.6. EXIST. PARKING SPACES , 1 - 1 - ---- i J I- -- -- -__ --- - _ _ -_ - ______7- _ _ _____ ___ ..-______ r. -• in N E W , )., ( ---- , - 0 41 2 __ ' ' ! ---- . , . iii 0 . .„, , • _I _ ) / / iii ,.... 4 - \ Z ill I. ADO - ON , . -,- , , .... _ 2 MIR - - - ' i F_:_t- DURHAM CENTER \-, ___ 1 P I ' )'-- alga.. . wi. . . Cr .. s ■ / r- II _ _____ ____ 1 EA S u , ,, >,--- (..) . _ 0 ..„-- 1 1--- a \ ty - ,. ____ ,.... L__ ( -- ■____- {Y , < ILI .------------„__, _ _ _____- - _-- — ix ill --T {,/, 46 , 0. F.FE. fe• 159.5' SCHOOL - A. (L ' all /i 16 CE I-1 r 1 1.4 9) S-4 0) 1 , ......--------- 0 k . / L . . A ■ W. A lo 1 ■ W V , \ \ . . . . . . ■.....,.7..a.r,. . . . . . \, 4 iy / r" ---i-q--- " --4— ' , 0._ , I / 0 \ \ \',... 114-- , . F.F.E a ' 159.5 1- • 1 . ----- < 41 o ,____ - r NEW It— (4 rii , -- CC) X ■ ' , , ,t r 1 NEW COVERED c\I 1 „ , . , 1 DE (n ` CAI , PLAY NEW PAVED Gill,RE5AGE 1" fr\ R A ODMCA1 , r , E_---- NCLOSURE 1 , . f , F ‘ aleamilial.s. / , , , 1 i t ''' 7; '< , / '` ' / ,. ' e 7 y '' , .1 '', ''',.',-,/ ' / ''' ' '' PAVED WALK -,,,c______ ' 1 ' 1 , ] 1 01 1 SEWER EA EMENT - (-------: I ,, . .... , , , /60 I FOR JAMES 4 AUDRE'r C ----/ 4 1..1 EXIST. 1 , / /' , , -. \-, , -- -----.1 1 I , , (---- I _1 • 158' //// ASTILE CZ) , • 1r 12111.1111. 7 1131111111114NT 1116011111W 11 . alialiallais —...-1--- -I-- , ,----"-.- , — PA YEE 9 WA.K .--""11 DZ ____, _____ _ ___ EX I ST: - 7 — . ______ __ _ ____ _________ _________ ___ .., ' _ , _ __._ __ _ STORM 40 _ 14' 7 14 8 150' 434.554PROPERTY LINE \\.. 40, , 6: _ 4 NEW " _ ,________ ------ EXIST. GRAVEL DRIVE - - \ GROUND -_____`w ____ _--- --- - - -- ----- ------] I COVER NEW C4 I - - f -------- -- NEW GRAVEL FIRE EQUIPMENT 1 c--i 1 --,,,,,_, --,,, . GROUND 'T' TUTURNOUT T I COVE i _ , -, --,....,,, ,,.„ 111 L44 Ill R ,, --,. r rn _A F —I 4 >-- I >— 4 i '-.1 Z r \ I H }___ r " J =--...1 0( I ui al ,, IL 1 pRopo CL \ \ . 0 s .,_...,__, L ___, S. PLAN -- ____ (Y \ ..-- a_ ILAII / 7 _ 1 ii = 30 1 , \ , I ....L:4 r-- / r- \co. \ ( , c., .. . ...c) CI E"'"1 R ' AREA ADDITIONS - 39,135 SF Nt (NI , AREA OP EXISTIG = 23,8.30 SF '-'‹ ig \ / , , N. ..7 _ 0 4 ,__________ __ c rt efh - \ -- --- Ev.4 AREA TOTAL BLDG = 2,9&5 er i — 1 - 5 J 8 I. • . . . ,, On 10 e IC h45( : 1° ( 9-7 - , , , , , . i : LOT SIZE: 0.48 A I I t C4 10L- - PAVING: &929 'E; SF 4- 4000 SF (NEW) 0 ,. 1 .---1 -- , PW LANDSCAPE 261101', SF (218281 SF APTER NEW ADDITION) I I q 'nen ft, 4 .-------- -- 1 I I .,,,,. — L Q., ..7., n , 4 , PARKING: EXIST. . && SPACES _1 -4z co Em 3—, REQD.: 50 STAPP x 1. 5 = 15 SPACES CU-2 e \ _______ NOTE: STORM WATER TREATMENT OPTIONS __ ARE LINE R INVESTIGATION. ........... _ ___ ._, ellall0IIIIII PROPERTY LINE • �8/23/ 80 70 60 - 50 40 30 20 10 e , __....,„._ - - — .1' , • ..:- . -,:'• ; '• — - •• - ' - "2••"'"' . -.:-‘ - _ : _.,, . _ , .. . . ,..... , , ., . . ., , _ r .. _ . ,. . ..,. ,-- . . , . . , ' . . , . ' . . • " '-`..' -- :: : .;;.• '. - - . ',•'•:" . . , . , V. '•:- . 1 : : , - •./ -- ,. : ' . . , . - • ':...-.....?"'";.:,.... • . - . .4' -t .';'••••• - l' .. ' . - --` ' • . . • . . . . . • •-i . • , v..„ ,_ 80 70 - , 60 . 50 . , . . . 30 20 . 10 0 ' - : . i , '- , : ., .-=..- .. - • ," . - . . . , . . . - -t. . ,.. .., .. . . , ,_ _ - . . _ . , • . '.'-'.5' ..- • --- - - . / . • . , . _ - . ,, . . . ._ EXIST. i 1 STORM i , 1 ... . , il : - ..; . _ - l :., ,. --, - . . , . „ i , I , - - , .. • _' ix 44.' PROPEIRTY LINE ..:::.::--..,. -.: - - , ... - . ' ..0- _ .---- - _______ _________ VL meow aisomam Norxmoom OnSIMMIND . . . - ..i - r - 4-14 - -1- .... .... ____. - ' -, _,. , _... ... .1. 0 • 14 ' A Al ,,--- .-. . . — LICE -. (e..,..±.... • . .: g 7, F 2? P” < o . , ..- - --' ICJ o 6 (') 6 ,____, 14 (F " - ..____4 . . • - . . ._, • ,,,:-...:-,'".:-.,: -- -. -.: . . ______ 0 -- • , .. „, .• .,. , . F1 R 4 O ... • • . __ ,.:• ..- ,,„---\ \_._ .., • ( . .._ . 1 . 1 ,. . \ / i . „, , FINE _ . __ _ ..1 „_. ------_, ..„ ,-- 1 ,(:) , x".-- .: ..., , c .'---- ---7----•-... -s! TN- i ,.. .. 14 - - --- Ic riii. :.....; • • , • ,,..,, - - , • ........ • • .......... • • ••••••■•■ • Illr / i ...■■•••■:: _1:r. :;"' =R..... • • ammo • • ....mom • • ••••••••••••••---. ,___. ....y _ . , . . , . All• F 1 R 1.• i alliv c. \ .- ..- 7' „.. . .......„- - - , . - 4 -- - : _ --- _ . ,- --..___,__,, 7" '\ „._ H , . , . .. , .. • ' . - =1," 0 • : -4, k I - . 1 c- . — - , . . . • . , 4 .- 12 Jill -N, ... _.,.-- ‘ .. . . , . -N. c4 1 R • . . -,.. —_______________ • -, , .. . . 1 A 101:1114 ,. .. - . . , _ . . ,...... • -..;...„. , , ._ . . .. . . , . .• , . . . „ 1 ' EXIST BLDG • • ' — / ft \ • • _-__„ . cv - i • , , . _ , . - . .. .. . ... • 3- - , . 1 5 •'..,.- . A . , . . . . . . . . . . 1 - . . ' . - - . . . . . ■ . . . , , ' . , . a I ' ' ' N . . - - - - - - - - - __.k \ I Z R : . k . . . . . . . L \ i , . • . . . , ( • , _ \ . . , t .. ._ . , ( : . _ i„,...,,L.,,‘, ,,. • ..L. _. ._L. • , , ....___ ___.., \ -------\\- ,.i, icrio) ,/,_i, .4.i.:•v_.... r ,, . .------- . .. . , . • . . it 1\ \ . . . \ , . , , , . _,..,..:, CAL. i)L- E i 48." ( . it.•=•: :.., '-..-- - - . _ , ... i i 15I 11 .. , \ f i ) Z < 4 ' ci ,.. _ , , _ , _ , i 1 1 _____ „ _ N ‘ -•-.. : illiP 18'0 ', , ... I , , 46 1 , , . 1 i ::.., 0 0 • 1 , 1 , , - i . .„.- 610- , ,..._ . FINE _ . ..• . „ . . ..___________ .•. , ., . / \ . \\ ___F I R 04 H Pi ,t- ..,--"---"-- ' _____ 0 ,t 1 -4 . , , . ' . • ----- \---„__ . CA • ....--'''' .....,„--". I ------------______ ::`' - ---- --______ -- --- --- - Q.) ill f:4 . . '.. fi;--; . - -..' • . , . , . . . lig ..., - 1 ---___ - - ----_ __, t S li l \ . . . .' _ - 1 - ..----4----'-' i ------_____ --) 2 4 " . - . , ', 4 , i - . o 1 '.,--k EXIT., . -, „.„•.-. ,, - . . . . . . 2 g , . ,• . E. . ,. - \ . . - - FINE 1- . : FENg . • . , ,,v... - . " . . - . . ,... -. :.; 1 , . , ----r-' ..--■ - , , . ttl . / \'' ' .e . • ' , . . . ! . „ . . , 0 ! (f' N, >C"---_______ l . . , . . I . . . . „ . r.--- . ' ,,.." ‘,./ v . . . . 0 - I al N O ' \ r . - - _ . . . ' ( 2 4 ", • Z . . .._ . „... , . , . ........ . ; . 2 . . . ; , ------ „ / . . . . , .. :• \ : • • _ . , . . 2 .. - : --.. . — — H FINE . , - : • r-• . ' , DURHAM CENTER ,---:,--- ' I i-1 T-4 0 . \ ', i - ' t —______. ,,, s . . ' - , . . . - It . , , . \ 1 • 1 ././ . . . , . . _ OLN._ --.-_ — U ., -,r,!; .••_, , - 0 . -: -- ' DU R HAM -"---... . . , . , . •-, . 1 i . . . .. .4 4 \ ( /---'-- -...,...____, -ff ill 0 ......---- . . ' 7 . . . ____,_.—__ 4 Ill . . 1 ' ..., ' / , , C H ... 0 0 : • . ° 0 1 e , , . . . , . ..,:. ,. , • _ ..- • . . . , . _. ...... , ____ , ,.„....,_,. , L- ,;-t . t., • " , lb • . , , - . _ ___._ 4 _i_ _ . , . , CD ,--;.. t , , t , . ! ; ,,,, . 0 !Mal itt4 li 1 . ■ ' - '‘. -;-- - 7 ' ,°°,.. - , ,, • • Crl I L_____ /6 \ I / I.:::-':-. . . „ . . . I ci. c. . — , . -----\------ _ 2 4 ". 6 .... 1 - , . , ; . . . . j .,,,_, , ...._ \ • i . . „ . . \ ,...__ . , • ,., - I • • .. . _ . , . - , --..,._ _ _ ____ F 1 _ , . .---.?-:- 1-- , . , EA .1 1 -.,1r ' -'- • . . .... .,,,,_ . .... . . , n - ' • r 1 . , . -, ,'K'. -,:' ' . . . , . . --------------„,______, . co . . , . I , - . ■ - (i) 4 E\2• . .. , .‘t , ..', , : ,-,'--. -_ • • . . . . - IV1 0 [ LI A F . .: . • . . . , . . • 114". 0 \, , . .,. • . . . 1 . < _ . .. . . , , • , .,..,..... .. , • . . IFR . „ . , , . , . . . . . , . . . . .., . , . . . ,..- 0 , . ... _ .., , . . . " . , . . . „, _ • . .....______, • , . , F . . ,,.... s- . ,.- . , , . . . . . r . , . „ 4 . . , \ • , , _... . , . , \ ° - 10' 5ELUER EAOEPIEN1T - .,--- J . . . _ it -- T . . . ,.,,... ..,,.., T I Ot # ' 1 CI 0 4 . % I ‘ ■ ' 3 _ .- - ‘ _ 3 - - , . . .. . . ._ . I. (7:-.----\\\7" . . , . . _. . . . , • ._ _.„... - k, . _ ....... ... .„--,-, . ... -- :-,- . , P - EXIST. , ..„.. . . _ . . ._, . , • „...„. _ , , . 1 ,.....1 14% FOR- - JAMES_ 4: 1.41:_, RETCAST I LE L _ n. ...:-. . • . I-0.t.,_ ..•-; •,.., , = - ..... - . . , ..57, -.- .: . , . 2 4 It o- :°=,3 ' - ',,,- . - . . . - — - EXIST. • _ . . .. .. „ s . • - 5AN ‘-..,.. .....5.,. „ _ . ., L.... _ _ ., _ .. ...... ,. . „. r .. . . ... . . . . . ._ . . . . . , . _ _____ __.„___,____ tl FL. f _ . C1-4ER . . . .... ,...... . ..., ..._ . .. .. ..._:. ... ' I 2 7..;_. ...c) . ' -- - , F 'OP - • ' - 61,*•••_ . • , • 7 • .........„ • ......„ ...-.-......,„_• _ • • _. . .7_, ---.....i.„ •• i t „... • • 7 ......_ . •_„.„.--• • ........ • • _. , sHED --. 1 AFL . . ____.---- . : . . . ,_., 1 :3 - o I-I- _________ _ „.._ . , . _ _._. • _-______.____-:.----_________._._;:______.____._-„--:-__ ...___ --------_-_ ___ ---_-_-_ -_-_-_:_..:_--_ __ i __._ ...... ___ ___________ __•______._:_______. ..._ . ....„ , < ; ,.,... _..... .. y ....;,./...,.., .._ . . , _____„________ _ ...____ .1 _ _ ___ ___ ___ __.,.____ ----•-__ _ . _ _.. _ - - _ _ . . . - - — - - — - XIST G----- - X . .. ‘„ mow •■■■•■• ■••■.... ..... wow ammo. al. mot •••■ '... ise r -- (1 ) . STO ."- - - ...._____ .., .____.__. _____ _ . _ __ . ____- , , _ , . ___. .,..., . _ ._ .., _ .... . . _ . ... . , , „,,,,,,, ....I •- . - . --,„....,„,.. • , \ 434.5' PIROPERTY L INE 1 ....i . • EXIST.AVEL-- DRIVE _. _ _ . _ _ LI , , \ , / ...'"------,... '''..------------ - ,-....,A . . . . . . ____--------t-------- - ---E-X-16-T-,-. -C-OUN-T-Y--ROAD--- . .-- . . . .1, . . . . . . r . . TO 5 E VACATEE) ( ---il , . . . • ...„ . . ..„„ .„ . \ oRTH ( A PPL ICAT ION MADE ) i . , ,..„... w • Ili 44 . . . ..-, - - • . , Z _ _ . _ -:._ _. . , . •• Z . i-_- 4 ,., s - L_ --ff ... ..... PAN „--! - .. ':. '''' - .4. >-- 1 .' . . . , . . . . . „ , . , >--- D C . :=:4,1v - • i--- i / t' CU r----------T\N XEIST. 1— i-- 4.4 . . . . . . r '.,,.,,- i., .• . -- - 1 t Ot I . . . II 30' . tn , 1.1.1 . . •: ., ... 1 _ _ . ,....„-, . 0— '. . : ..... _ LI , i f . . ..,._,- 0 . ...,,-.- , • . . -; . . . \ .411Z: Z (Y V : . . . _ V - ',-", t ,..• 4 = .- =t- ------.\,..\\ LOT SIZE: 5.45 A --:- - 0_ \ (--- , _ „, , . . ( EXIST 1:5LID- 23 530 S F _ ..: ,, 1.....) • , ' - - . 4 .\ ' (L ‘ - _•: - "ri a '. - - . =" f:: • . PORTA5L E : 3360 ..,SP ...0 . ....„ .:. .. . PAVING: 6 (32 ea 5F: _t_. (., ... . .R0 .1- ., „.. LANSCAPE 21101' SF -Kt . _ Lail. \\ ) . . .._. , L E-21 '...i \il l'Z 'l 1 4, , , , . ..: . ___• * -..: ,... , — _ _ TIO . "=}4, . • •- , •-..- r t - . . .., , . . Z ..,,, - . - - fi 5 a . . . _ ( Z) ,-s;:: -,- , , 7 t.: ' 5 - . : . . .. I . - -:-..-- . . . 1. I . . r . . . . . . ... . 1 , . .„. _ . . .. . . , . . . . . . ... . __. . - , , , . . , - IRRaN bt. C !R CO -- ''' I . . ! I fZ) C4 , r q 1 X '•- : 1 __.1 ____, , .. ..._.. . ( ,.1 ) kill . . . , • • !,- . . '1.:f • .- - --,- • - r . - , . . . " , . . . . . . . . . • \ . . . . _ _ ______ ____ -- . . _ - . _ ,_,. ______ ___ _ _ . . .. . . r . . 1 . . - . '=!::.:- :..r •'",i, - ' ' - , .. alcomsa•• swim.. anallam■ II•MISMCWO WO ■=9/7■80. sip •■•■=wwo , PROPERTY L INE . .- , . - - '.- -.... , . . , . - - _ - / .,-.. , - . , . '- ' - g - -' --''" :,i'' '' 4 . _ . , = . , . . • ' . . . . , "--• - • , -, . t = ;'g ,.- ';'' -=, - * , . „ . . ' - - . . . , . ,_ 6 , . ' . . 40 30 20 10 a .M11•31. 0/23/ 80 70 0 50 (35 ° . , . . - ' . . . , . ' ' t _ . - ,. - , • . .. . , , ' . . :. . . • ..."-- . - , - - '.."--...:,=; ' ' -, - . . , ' . - . • . . . , . • -4. , . ..i. - . . . - . . - . .. .. ,,. . ■ 4 ■ 4 1 4 ■ ' . ' ■