MLP1996-00011
NOTICE OF 'DECISION
.
MINOR-L'. AND PARTITION (MLP) 96-0011
CITY OF HOARD
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR)196-Q.:00.3:.
JEFFREY PARTITION
SECTION I: APPLICATION SUMMARY
CASES: FILE NAME: JEFFREY PARTITION
Minor Land Partition MLP 96-0011
Sensitive Lands Review SLR 96-0003
PROPOSAL: The applicant has requested:
1. Minor Land Partition Review to divide one 1.81 acre site into
three lots of 20,003, 28,371 and 30,872 square feet.
2. Sensitive Lands Review to develop a portion of the property that
currently contains slopes in excess of 25%.
APPLICANT: Ryan O'Brien OWNER: Harry and Judith Jeffrey
Land Development Consultants 14520 SW Fern Street
233 SE Washington Street Tigard, OR 97223
Hillsboro, OR 97123
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential (7-12 dwelling units per acre).
ZONING
DESIGNATION: R-7 (Single Family Residential/5,000 square foot minimum).
LOCATION: 14520 SW Fern Street; WCTM 2S1 0413C, Tax Lot 1100.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92,
18.96, 18.100, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.162 and 18.164.
SECTION II: DECISION:
Nofice is hereby given that the City of Tlgartl:Community:Development Director's tlesgnee
has APPROVED the above request subject to the following Conditions:>of.*pproval
The findin sand conclusions on which the decision is based are notetl in Section IV
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 1
• •
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
:
PRIOR TO APPR01/AL OF THE FINAL PARTITION:PLAT,
:THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
(Unless otherwise noted,'the staff contact'shallbe Brian Rager,„
Engineering Department (503) 639-4171
1. A public improvement permit and compliance agreement are required for this project.
Five (5) sets of detailed public improvement plans and profile construction drawings
shall be submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once
redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design engineer shall
then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1) itemized construction cost
estimate for final review and approval (NOTE: these plans are in addition to any
drawings required by the Building Division and should only include sheets relevant to
public improvements. Public improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard
Public Improvement Design Standards, which are available at City Hall.
2. Any necessary off-site utility easements shall be the responsibility of the applicant to
obtain and shall be submitted to, and accepted by the City.
3. An agreement shall be executed by the applicant, on forms provided by the City,
which waives the property owner's right to oppose or remonstrate against a future
Local Improvement District formed to improve SW Fern Street.
4. The final plat shall indicate that the driveway access onto Fern Street will be jointly
used and maintained by both Parcels 2 and 3. A joint access easement shall be
shown on the plat.
5. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the public
improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the storm drainage basin
and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as a supplement to the public
improvement plans. Calculations shall be based on full development of the
serviceable area. The location and capacity of existing, proposed, and future lines
shall be addressed.
6. If the applicant chooses to gain sewer access through the property to the south
(proposed Hillshire Hollow subdivision), they shall wait until the sewer line in that
project is complete and accepted by the City. If the Fern Street sewer is utilized, the
applicant shall extend the main line in Fern Street to the west boundary of this site.
The public improvement drawings must indicate which sewer option will be used.
7. The applicant shall provide sanitary sewer laterals to the adjacent undeveloped
properties.
8. Any extension of public water lines to serve this property shall be included in the
public improvement drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by the Water
Department.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 2
0 •
9. The applicant shall determine if they can provide an on-site water quality facility as
proposed on the preliminary plat, and as required by Unified Sewerage Agency
Resolution and Order No. 91-47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to
the Engineering Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval. In addition, a
proposed maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations
for review and approval. If the Engineering Department determines that a water
quality facility is impractical for this site, the fee in-lieu option will be offered.
10. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement drawings.
The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plans -
Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994.
11. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Three mylar copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor licensed to
practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the minimum
standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05), Washington
County, and by the City of Tigard.
IN ADDITION, :THE APPLICANT`SHOULD BE.AWARE OF.THE FOLLOWING
SECTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY. DEVELOPMENT CODE;
THIS IS' NOT ANEXCLUS.IVE. LIST
SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement
1. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant (subdivider)
shall:
A. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the period
within which all required improvements and repairs shall be completed; and
B. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not completed within
the period specified, the City may complete the work and recover the full cost
and expenses from the applicant.
2. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be required to
be paid and may also provide for the construction of the improvements in stages and
for the extension of time under specific conditions therein stated in the contract.
SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES
1. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall:
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 3
• 0
A. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 percent of other adequate
assurances as a condition of approval of the site development plan in order to
ensure the completed project is in conformance with the approved plan; and
B. Approve and release such bonds.
2. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project conforms
to the approved site development plan and all conditions of approval are satisfied.
SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS.
Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required
Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is discontinued for
any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS,
THEFOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE`SATISFIED
12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the Engineering
Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat.
13. A site permit will be required for grading. A grading and erosion control plan from a
Civil Engineer with a Geotechnical report will be required.
STAFF CONTACT: Bob Thompson, Building Department.
14. The applicant shall submit plans for review and approval to the Tualatin Valley Fire
District. These plans shall address the concerns noted by the Fire Marshall that are
contained elsewhere within this staff report.
STAFF CONTACT: Gene Birchill, Tualatin Valley Fire District.
.PRIOR TO THE'.ISSUA CE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS;
THE :FOLLOWW CONDITION SHALL BE' SATISFIED:
15. The applicant shall construct the proposed 20-foot wide private access driveway.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts, Planning Division.
THIS APPR01/AL SHALL 6E VALID FOR 18 MONTHS
FROM:THE EFFECTIVE DATED1 THIS DECISION
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 4
•
SECTION III: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site History:
The site is presently developed with a detached single-family residence that was
developed while the property was within Washington County. The home's driveway was
recently reconfigured to take access from SW Ascension Drive. In 1995 the property
owner requested annexation to the City. Zone Change and Annexation request (ZCA) 95-
0003 was approved by the City Council on September 12, 1995. The Boundary
Commission approved this annexation effective October 19, 1995.
Vicinity Information:
Adjoining properties to the south and east are developing within the Hillshire Woods
Subdivision, or planned for development within the proposed Hillshire Hollow Subdivision.
To the west is the Hillshire Creek Subdivision that is under Washington County jurisdiction.
To the north the property is adjoined by Bonneville Power and Portland General Electric
Utility easements and existing detached single-family residences.
Site Information and Proposal Description:
The site is presently developed with a detached single-family residence that takes access
from SW Ascension Drive. The portion of the property that is proposed to be developed
slopes towards utility easements located within the westerly portion of the property. The
site also has several dozen existing trees that are located primarily around the existing
home. The applicant proposes to remove approximately two dozen trees in the area of
the proposed residential building sites.
SECTION IV: APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS:
Sensitive Lands - Approval Standards: Section 18.84 contains regulations for
Sensitive Lands. Section 18.84.040(B) states that the Director shall approve an
application for sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25% or greater based upon
findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied:
The extent and nature of the proposed land use form alteration or development will
not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use. The
remaining undeveloped portion of this flag lot site is an area measuring approximately 200
feet by 300 feet. A 100-foot area towards SW Ascension Drive is developed with an existing
single-family residence. A second 100-foot area along the westerly property line contains a
Portland General Electric utility easement. This existing easement precludes private
development improvements such as residential dwelling units.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 5
0 0
The remaining 100-foot "center" area of the subject property is the only area on-site that can
be considered for development. This area is also the more steeply sloping portion of the
site. The land form alterations that are proposed are the minimum amount necessary to
develop the property for residential use due to the existing constraints on other portions of
the site.
The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream
sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or
hazards to life or property. As a part of the Building Permit application, the applicant is
required to submit an erosion control plan for review and approval and construct the required
erosion control measures that protect the aforementioned natural features. Through the
Building Permit and inspection process, the applicant will be required to demonstrate that
the proposed structures will be designed to meet the current applicable structural
requirements.
The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and
proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the
following soil conditions: wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability;
compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to-bedrock. Through the Building Permit and
inspection process, the applicant will be required to demonstrate that the proposed
structures will be designed to meet the current applicable structural requirements.
Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or
development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be
replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, Landscaping and
Screening. The applicant will be required to construct the erosion control measures that are
to be provided on an approved erosion control plan. The erosion control plan will set forth
required temporary and permanent erosion control methods.
Minor Land Partition - Approval Standards: Section 18.162.040 contains the following
general approval criteria for a Minor Land Partition:
1. The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan;
2. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements
and regulations;
3. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal;
4. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this
title; and
5. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards (Ord.
89-06; Ord. 83-52).
Each of the proposed parcels would exceed the 5,000 square foot minimum. The proposed
parcels comply with the R-7 Zoning District. The parcels, as proposed, would allow the
development of one detached single-family residential dwelling unit on each lot, or duplex
dwelling units on each lot, or three attached units on each lot subject to the applicant
requesting Site Development Review approval. The lot size and type of development
conform with the Comprehensive Plan as required by Criteria 1 in terms of the development
standards that implement the Comprehensive Plan designation for this property.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 6
i •
The development does not exceed the maximum residential density allowed within the R-7
Zoning District. The net site area yields the opportunity to develop up to 11 dwelling units as
discussed within the applicant's narrative. Upon completion of the appeal period,
compliance with Conditions of Approval, and subsequent plat recording, the proposal will
have complied with the statutory requirements for development review as required by
Criteria 2.
Adequate public facilities are available or have been required to be provided to serve this
site as set forth in Sections 18.164.030 (Streets), 18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and
18.164.100 (Storm Drainage) as required by Criteria 3. These requirements are reviewed by
the Engineering Department elsewhere within this report.
The new parcels do not exceed a two and one-half to one, lot depth to width ratio. The R-7
Zoning District has an average width requirement of 50 feet. Each proposed parcel would
have an average lot width of a minimum of 100 feet, in compliance with this requirement.
For these reasons, the proposed parcel configurations conform with the size and
dimensional requirements of the R-7 Zoning District as required by Criteria 4.
The existing and future site improvements comply, or will comply with the applicable City
and Agency development standards in satisfaction with Criteria 5. The parcels comply with
the Basic Solar Access requirements because the north-south dimension of each parcel
exceeds a 90-foot dimension. Future development of structures on the new parcel will
require compliance with Solar Balance Point Standards of Section 18.88 to ensure access to
solar energy.
Section 18.162.050 contains the following special provisions for lots created through
the Partition Process:
1. Lot Width: The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot
requirement of the applicable zoning district.
2. Lot Area: The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In
the case of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area
calculation.
3. Lot Frontage: Each lot created through the partition process shall front a
public right-of-way by at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15
foot wide access easement.
4. Setbacks: Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
5. Front Yard Determination for Flag Lot: When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the
developer may determine the location of the front yard, provided that no side
yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall generally be located so as to
maximize separation from existing structures.
6. Screening on Flag Lots: A screen shall be provided along the property line of
a lot of record where the paved drive in an accessway is located within ten feet
of an abutting lot in accordance with Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090.
Screening may also be required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to
provide usable outdoor recreation areas for proposed development.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 7
7. Fire Protection: The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant
where the length of an accessway would have a detrimental effect on fire
fighting capabilities.
8. Reciprocal Easements: Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more
than one lot, a reciprocal easement that will ensure access and maintenance
rights shall be recorded with the approved partition map.
9. Accessway: Any accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in
Chapter 18.108, Access, Egress, and Circulation.
10. Floodplain: Where landfill and/or development is allowed within or adjacent to
the one-hundred-year floodplain, the City shall require the dedication of
sufficient open land area for greenway adjoining and within the floodplain.
This area shall include portions at a suitable elevation for the construction of a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway with the floodplain in accordance with the adopted
pedestrian/bicycle pathway plan.
Criterion's 1, 2, 3, and 4 are satisfied. The parcels will exceed the minimum area
requirement of 5,000 square feet set forth for properties zoned R-7. Each newly created
parcel will have in excess of 15 feet of direct frontage on a private street, in satisfaction of
the lot frontage requirement in Criteria 3. The standards for setbacks and clear vision
requirements will be reviewed for new structures at the time of Building Permit Review,
satisfying Criteria 4. Criteria 5 concerning the front yard setback determination for these
parcels can be addressed prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Criteria 6 requires
screening of flag lots. The newly created lots are flag lots, however, given the design and
location of existing homes in the areas it not necessary to screen the access driveway from
other residential properties in the area. The access roadway is proposed to be developed
within approximately the middle of two utility easements with a total of 200 feet in width.
These utility easements are not to be abandoned for this purpose to allow residential
development to adjoin the proposed access driveway within this area.
Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, fire hydrants shall be made consistent with the
Uniform Fire Code spacing standards, thereby, satisfying Criteria 7. Criteria 8 requires a
reciprocal access and maintenance agreement. An agreement is required because shared
access to the existing private street can be provided.
Criteria 9 will be satisfied prior to the issuance of Occupancy Permits through the
requirement for construction of ' 10-foot-wide minimum paved driveway to serve the new
parcels. Criteria 10 has been met because the parcel is not located within the 100-year
flood plain, wetlands or drainageways. The site contains areas with slopes exceeding 25
percent. The applicant has addressed the applicable Sensitive Lands Review requirements
elsewhere within this report. Because the site-does not adjoin the 100-year flood plain,
dedication of areas for pathway purposes is not applicable.
PUBLIC FACILITY CONCERNS:
Provision of public facilities as required under Section's 18.164.030(E)(1)(a) (Streets),
18.164.090 (Sanitary Sewer), and 18.164.100 (Storm Drains). Provision of water and
required grading and erosion control methods shall also be satisfied as specified
below:
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 8
STREETS:
This site lies adjacent to SW Fern Street, and backs up to SW Ascension Drive. Fern
Street is classified as a local residential street and is being improved as a part of adjacent
development in the area. There is 50 feet of right-of-way (ROW) currently, which meets
the City standard for that type of street. Therefore, no additional dedications are required.
This site only has approximately 50 feet of frontage on Fern Street and the addition of the
two proposed lots will not result in a significant traffic impact on the street. Therefore, it
does not seem practical to require the applicant to provide a half-street improvement on
Fern Street at this time. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to enter into a
non-remonstrance agreement with the City that will obligate them to participate in the
future improvements of Fern Street adjacent to their site. This agreement should be
executed prior to approval of the final partition plat.
Southwest Ascension Drive is fully improved and provides access to the existing house on
this site (shown to be located on Parcel 1 of the proposed partition). The topography of
this site is such that Parcel 1 is 30 feet higher than Parcels 2 and 3. Therefore, it seems
practical that Parcel 1 should continue to have access onto SW Ascension Drive. Parcels
2 and 3 will have access out to Fern Street. The applicant has stated that they may obtain
an access easement from the property owner to the south for Parcel 3. The property to
the south is currently under a subdivision review for a project called Hillshire Hollow.
SANITARY SEWER:
There is an eight inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Fern Street that can serve this site.
At present the line terminates at the intersection of Ascension Drive. If service is to be
obtained from this line, the applicant must extend the main line westward in Fern Street to
this site. They must also extend the line to the west boundary of this site to allow for
future extension and service to adjacent parcels.
The applicant also proposes an alternate route for sewer service through the site to the
south (proposed Hillshire Hollow subdivision). Since the Hillshire Hollow project has not
been approved, Staff can not recommend approval of the applicant's proposal. Staff is
also concerned about the proposed route of the public sewer line that would have to be
extended from the Hillshire Hollow site. The applicant's plans show the line extending
through a proposed water quality facility in the Hillshire Hollow project. Any public sewer
line must be located outside of any storm water detention or treatment facility and must be
accessible to City maintenance vehicles. In order for the applicant's proposal to be
approved, the Hillshire Hollow project must be built and approved prior to this partition
taking place (prior to recording of the final plat). Certainly, before the applicant is allowed
to connect to any sewer extension from the Hillshire project, the City must inspect and
approve the Hillshire sewer line.
In summary, either of the above options for sewer service could be acceptable to the City.
However, if the applicant chooses to be served through the Hillshire project, timing of the
Hillshire improvements will be a factor.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 9
STORM DRAINAGE:
Storm water from this site will flow to the west toward an existing creek. The applicant is
proposing to collect the storm water from the new lots in a pipe adjacent to the west
boundary and treat it in a swale prior to discharging into the creek. In order to get to the
creek, a pipe will need to cross over property subject to a Bonneville Power Administration
(BPA) easement. The applicant will be required to obtain an off-site easement granting
permission to place the pipe. This easement must be obtained prior to approval of the
final plat.
STORM WATER QUALITY:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations
established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as
amended by R&O 91-75) which require the construction of on-site water quality facilities.
The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100
percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created impervious surfaces. In
addition, a maintenance plan is required to be submitted indicating the frequency and
method to be used in keeping the facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of
a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality
facility that will meet the intent of R&O 9147. In addition, the applicant shall submit a
maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to
issuance of the building permit.
The applicant is proposing to construct a water quality Swale to treat storm water from the
private driveway and the new lots. Staff believes that a Swale may be impractical on such
a small development, but will make that determination upon formal review of the design
plan for the swale. If Staff determines that the Swale option is impractical, the applicant
will have the option of paying a fee in-lieu of constructing the facility.
WATER:
The applicant is proposing to extend a public water line from the proposed Hillshire Hollow
development. Since that project is not approved or built yet, Staff does not know if the
option is valid. The applicant should be required to coordinate with the Water Department
(Mike Miller) regarding water service for this development. Any public water line
extensions shall be included in the public improvement plans for this project and must be
approved by the City's Water Department.
GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL:
USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of sediment and
other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water system resulting from
development, construction, grading, excavating, clearing, and any other activity that
accelerates erosion. Per R&O 9147, the applicant is required to submit an erosion
control plan for City review and approval prior to issuance of City permits.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 10
SECTION V: OTHER STAFF COMMENTS
The Building Department has reviewed this proposal and provided the following
comments:
1. The proper storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water service, easements, etc. shown on
the final plat.
2. Where applicable, permission will need to be provided from the adjoining utility
easements to dump new storm water onto the easement area.
3. A site permit will be required for grading. Grading and erosion control plan from a
Civil Engineer with a Geotechnical report will be required.
No other comments or objections were received.
SECTION VI: AGENCY COMMENTS
The Tualatin Valley Fire District has reviewed this proposal and provided the following
comments: This plan is not approved as proposed. Please submit plans that address the
following items to the Tualatin Valley Fire Marshall's Office for review and approval.
1. Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily
distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less
than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and 50,000 pounds live load ( gross
vehicle weight).
2. Where fire apparatus roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked
vehicles, "No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway
and in turnarounds as needed. "Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE -
TOW AWAY, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space above ground
level of seven feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have
black or red letters on a white background.
No other comments or objections were received.
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 11
011 •
SECTION VII: PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to:
X The applicant and owners
X Owner of record within the required distance
X Affected government agencies
Final Decision:
THE DECISION SHALL BE FINAL ON AUGUST 14, '1996
UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED
Appeal:
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section
18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the Community Development Code that provides
that a written appeal must be filed with the City Recorder within 10 days after notice is
given and sent. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning
Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223.
THE. DEADLINE FOR FILING OP:AN APPEAL IS 3 30 P M ON .AUGUST 14, 1996
Questions:
If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City
Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 639-4171.
August 1 1996
- vozk "a~- PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, AICP DATE
Associate Planner
2Y::I4 August 1. 1996
APPROVED BY: Richard wersdorff DATE
Planning Manager
I:\CURPL WATTYIMLP-DEC. DOT
NOTICE OF DECISION MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 - JEFFREY PARTITION Page 12
So I
S.W. FERN STREET
501,041
i 10002' iL , N 1y o '1 500r MAW I
I I,
i
I
20'
Ti.. 1300
I
Q +
I Y
z
0
ui ~ +
m i ~ •n' N69.43aDf Fn96• ~ A
rp o I m SITE DATA `
1
~yy
17111 PI N APPLICANT. HARRY I- I JA21TH A. GREY -
'C m 14520 5.11 FERN STREET Q
T n S nGARD, ORE60N 9T223
FYI I m PH, (503) 5240431
Z I Z PROPOSAL. 3-LOT MINOR PARnnoN s / A
' SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEN V
S TL. 1200 N EwsnNS wNna, R-T
- 100' SIZE, IDO ACRES
y I i TOP066W.MY. AFIELD SURVEY - LAND DEVELOPEFIENT C0WALTANTS
A I AVERAGE LOT SIZE, 19.165 50. FT.
D
~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION. TAX LOT 1100 Z
TAX MAP 251-400
W Z
n7 `y STORM
VX pp N SANITARY sENEw CITY OR nGARD
tt1 N A I 6
~ 1177 1~1 ) 4 lL HATER, CITY OF TIGARD J
3 T, I Ib9.4D90t 241.-rr NATLRAL GAS. NORTWE-ST NAn1RAL GAS
O y ?3( 15a - 100• i
~ m. F`' >i O C2CTRIC- PF62.
N N ~~1ppy TELER1O, G.TE. Q
J y _ G u D FIRE
~ T.V. FIRE 4 RESCLE
I s g I ~ fij
I ( p T
+
_ N N
• ~ ' ~ ITS' _ Y: N ~ V
o a a s
20' V•p .ZT
a I Dec K LL
4. I A o
s
IOOq' 20, : 20a 100' - ( j I
299.99•
Z11.43130"W 400.00' ■
t,~ t
V
1 1
. C1, I
P)
:S
r.
SITE PLAN CASE No.
EXHIBIT MAP I Jeffrey Partition
ml MLP 96-0011
SLR 96-0003
7%
~ Q
I
G
w
SUM T
ca
ON L mmm>o PO
FPQ) I
I o,
1
MAP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 I
Vicinity Map
Jeffrey Partition , i
~~.~ebm~ N
IYLL/' qlo-IV54-14 -pkr 7-f e)d f vT °Z,
Exi-
y i
Harry & Judith Jeffrey 2s104ec-01300
BRIGHT, WILLIAM ALBERT AND F _i '
14520 SW Fern Street KAREN L
Tigard OR 97223 14444 SW FERN ST
TIGARD,OR 97223-1571
2S105DA-00400 2S10500-01300
DAVIS, MICHAEL K & EVANS, ROBERT V
JEANNE R 12745 NE MORRIS ST
PO BOX 23144 PORTLAND,OR 97230
TIGARD,OR 97223
2S104BC-01700 2S104BC-01100
HOHNBAUM, MICHAEL LEE & KART R JEFFERY, HARRY E & JUDITH A
14160 SW FERN ST 13975-A SW PACIFIC HWY
TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223
2S104BC-01500 2S104BC-01000
LUDLUM, ROBERT S PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC
LUDLUM, JOANN COMPANY
14065 SW FERN ST ATTN: PROPERTY DEPARTMENT
TIGARD,OR 97223 121 SW SALMON
PORTLAND,OR 97204
2S104BC-01200 2S104BC-05200
RIEKER, DAVID TRUSTEE SIERRA PACIFIC DEVE EIC ANC
14504 SW FERN ST PO BOX
TIGARD,OR 97223 bVE OSWEGO,OR 97035
2S104BC-02700 2S104BC-02800
SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT INC SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOP
PO BOX 1754 PO BOX 17
LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 SWEGO,OR 97035
2S104BC-02900 2S104BC-03100
SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOP INC SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPM
PO BOX 175 PO BOX 17
GO,OR 97035 SWEGO,OR 97035
2S104BC-05300 2S104BC-05400
SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOP NC SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELO ENT c
PO BOX 1754 PO BOX 1754
EGO,OR 97035 EGO,OR 97035
2S104BC-05500 2S104BC-05600
4ICr
SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOP T INC SIERRA PACIFIC DPO BOX PO BOX 17
OSWEGO,OR 97035 SWEGO,OBonneville Power Administration
PO Box 3621 ROUTING TTRC-Attn: Renae Ferrera
Portland OR 97208-3621
2S104CB-02100 2S104CB-02200
SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPME NC SIERRA PACIFIC DE / NT INC
PO BO) PO BO)
KE OSWEGO,OR 97035 OSWEGO,OR 97035
2S104CB-02300 2S104CB-02400
SIERRA PACIFIC DEV 21Pf INC SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT INC
PO BO) PO BOX 1754
OSWEGO,OR 97035 LA 61lC O,OR 97035
2S10500-01401 2S1046C-03000
SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOP NC SIERRA-PACIFIC DEVELOPMEN
PO BOX PO BOX 1754
OSWEGO,OR 97035 LAI&B& GO,OR 97035
City of Tigard. Oregon
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Washington ) ss.
City of Tigard )
I, Patricia L. Lunsford, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say:
that I am an Administrative Specialist II for The City of Tigard, Oregon.
❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED PUBLIC HEARING FOR:
(Chu* Ous aeoYrr it appecaetiI (chew approprr~e boot below) (Eater Public Hearing Oats above)
0 City of Tigard Planning Director
0 Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard City Council
That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED DECISION FOR:
tMa* bm Ow^ Of dP0k=ay City of Tigard Planning Director,
❑ That I served NOTICE OF (AMENDED FINAL ORDER FOR:
ta.ac bm -I rtchea apprrcpriate box below)
0 City of Tigard Planning Director
0 Tigard Planning Commission
❑ Tigard Hearings Officer
❑ Tigard City Council
❑ That I served OTHER NOTICE OF FOR:
A copy of the PUBLIC HEARING NOTICEINOTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER/OTHER NOTICE(S)
of whi is attached, marked Exhibit "A", was mailed to each ed p son(s) at the addres (s) shown on the
atta~C a list(s), marked Exh" it "B", the / y of 199 and deposited
in the ited State it o e y of 199 , postage prepaid.
f
red Notice r-\ h
Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the day of , 1
OFFICIAL SEAL
DIANE M JELDERKS I,
NOTARY PLIBLIC•OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 040142
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 07, 1999 NOTARY PUBLI U 0OREG N
My Commission fires:
L -7
PILE INPO.4Z~~
NAME(S):
CASE NO.(S): /U LZgb IVl151X 1? &3
TYPE OF NOTICE & DATE:
CITY OF TIGARD
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION
FILE NO: MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 96-0011
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0003
FILE TITLE: JEFFREY PARTITION
APPLICANTS
REPRESENTATIVE: Ryan O'Brien OWNER: Harry & Judith Jeffrey
Lana Development Consultants, Inc. 14520 SW Fern Street
233 SE Washington Street Tigard, OR 97223
Hillsboro, OR 97123
{Phone} (503) 648-4061 {Fax} (503) 681-7646 (503) 524-0431
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval to partition one (1) 1.81 acre lot into
three (3) lots of 20,003, 28,371 and 30,872.
LOCATION: 14520 SW Fern Street (WCTM 2S1 04 BC, Tax Lot 1100).
A~~~~ddl~s = l ~ ~~S 5 ~ As~v>~✓ o~► ~>i ~
ZONE: R-7 (Single-family residential, 5,000 square feet atttached per unit). The purpose
of the R-7 zoning district is to establish sites for attached and detached single-
family residences.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.96,
18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.162 and 18.164.
CIT: West CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request
PHONE NUMBER: (503)
DECISION MAKING BODY
X STAFF DECISION
_ PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00
CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30
RELATIVE COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION
X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN X NARRATIVE X
ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN X OTHER Top graphic Map
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (503) 639-4171 x317
MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 JEFFREY PARTITION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
I
Pr' PA&
S z
3
CITY of TwARo, 0RER0N
Ai;~
?ARTIT_ION APPLICATION / ,5e m-,s' 1 v ~ ~
CITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall
,,Tigard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY
CASE NO «l A
. ti;2q ° Z I
OTHER CASE NO'S: Se~O~tY~lt'k~ COn~ RECEIPT NO.
- (o
az;b SG S-4• ,
APPLICATION AC T/ED BY:~(a~Q
O(lei`~ ~~~QI' LQgI--&QQC~ DATE: G Z~
GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted:
?ROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION tL-15zIc') G`t X<mSk: Application form (1)
V (B) Owner's signature/written
rAX MAP AND TAX LOT NO. /uthorizatioa
;;&g- \CC) (C) Title transfer instrument (1)
>ITE SIZE (:h(-, Yy G~( Assessor's map (1)
?ROPERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER (E) Plot plan (pre-app check list)
ADDRESS ~i r PH0ffNf C/ oy37 (r) Applicant's statement
°"ITY 726 2D ZIP g72.2 3 (pre-app check list)
APPLICANT*
.kDDRESS ~,f/4U PHONE g'~zy-Dy 37
CITY ~ ZIP q'7Z23 (H) Filing fee (235)
jdq/)
-t- Z
*When the owner and the applicant are different -~-~-7 1 ~4
?eoole, the applicant must be the purchaser of record
or a leasee in possession with written authorization' DATE 9ETER.I: D TO 3E COMPLETE:
'_-om the owner or an agent of the owner with written
vithorization. The owner(s) must sign this
~olication in the space provided on page two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE:
emit a written authorization with this application.
COMP. PLAN/ ONE DE IGN TION
PROPOSAL STJNLHLRY e-7
The owners of record of the subject property
request permission to divide . .
total area
into 3 containing Planning Director Approval Date:
(No. of oarcels
and a___= (or square
feet each) . Final Approval Date:
-r6r3~ I and -So -e'7-Z Planning
Engineering
:19P/13P Recordation Date and Number:
ev'd: 3/88
3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered
~Z~f(~
as part of this application:
4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments
described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this
application.
5. THE APPLICANT(S)•SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be
attached to or imposed upon the subject property.
B. If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights
granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and
limitations of the approval.
C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,
attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the
applicants -so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this
application, may be revoked if it is found that- any such statements are
false.
D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including
the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving
or denying the application.
DATED this In day of
SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property.
i
(KSL:pm/0737P)
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
WITHIN SEVEN ('D CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO:
. Ci of Ti
.Planning Division..;:.::..,...:
'13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
I, RAggi r3,. JF_FF-rtzY , do affirm that I am the party initiating
interest in a proposed .(AuD pg,~LTiory w affecting the land
located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently
registered) 14S-z o S w FBK-o cT ~~485 sw ,4s~>zi Ns f o~ pr? , ,and
did on the Z I s_ day of MAY ,
19T-b- personally post notice indicating that the site maybe proposed fora
cd,~n~ r ►oa.~` VSF- application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood
meeting to discuss the proposal.
The sign was posted at /1-f~.2o Ste.- f -eW s i- !z9 b's sca
w 2~ nfL ~~zz3
(state location you posted notice on property)
;anaturey'_(fln the r s n of a Notary Public)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE)
S6
Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the 22)` day of AI,4 c/ '19
OFFICIAL SEAL
DANIEL POET
/ NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO.049410
'COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 3,1999
NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires: 1 Z 3 - ? 9
(Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project)
r~ OF PROJECTOR PROPOSED NAl`iE: L1AR6~ *JuyI T-4 J mi=l= FL CME I TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: !-*x>D GAAr-7r16A11d/G . i RESrPE " i Daot,0~_X
Name of Applicant/Owner. C, tj J y DI K-H A, %f_FF/j K Y
! k ddress or General Location of Subj Property: J `iSAo Sur FERN 57- , T164RD Ok 7 7 Z •Z 3
LSubject Propery Tax Map(s) and Lot T(s): a R 104,6c- - -r //oo
n: ~login1pa-
-Gy~rnauers+a~post.r. s',
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
) SS.
City of Tigard )
1, I ~2~/ ,1 OFF Y being duly swam, depose
and say that on _-MA y 31 191& 1 caused to have mailed to each
of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed
development at (or near)
7-/6R2D . a2 177Z Z3
a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
1 further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said
persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post
Office located at '719,49P i 1k%
with postage prepaid thereon.
&gnatu (In rese of a Notary Public)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETFINOTARIZE)
Subscribed and swum/affirmed before me on the 3 1 day of 19 94
OFFICIAL SEAL
DANIEL POET
i NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
coMMlssloN No. oasa~9 NO ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 3,1999
My Commission Expires:
(Applicant. please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project)
`..kN1E OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NAN E: 2p- j 4 1 u DI rA JILFFli 2 y
WPE OF PROPOSED DMLOPMEINT: 1 ~xiA PART' -r/ EsrD ~Gz / P f✓Pu~`' -
?lame of Applicanc'Owner.~MA SUP iTN fF J ~FEg-y ~
Address or C-eneral Location of Subject Properry. J'jWZc S c.t Fs-AA/ c`T ?iEa R p *8 f-72- Z 7
I
L ub~ect Proeemr Tax Map(s) -and - Lot T(s): of 2 to 13 L
- /100 - O- - h.1bginkoaayVnattersWftnad.ms2
May 31, 1995
(See Mailing List)
RE: Land Partitioning & Development
Dear Interested Party:
Harry E. and Judith A. Jeffery are proposing to partition Tax
Lot 1100 of Tax Map 2510-104BC into three parcels. We would
like to discuss this proposal in more detail with the
surrounding property owners and residents. You're invited to
the following meeting:
When: June 13, 1996
Where: Our home with entrance off of new Ascension
Drive with the address of 12985 SW. It's the
first driveway south of Fern Street(up the hill).
Time : 7:30 PM
Please note, this will be an informational meeting on
preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to
submittal of application to the City.
I look forward to discussing more specifically the proposed
partitioning and development. Please feel free to call me at
524-0437.
Sincerely,
Harry E. Jeffery
Mailing List for Harry Jeffery Project Notification Letter
Pat Wyden, CIT Resident/Land Owners
8122 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223 Mr. & Mrs. Bill Bright
14444 SW Fern Street
Craig Hopkins, CIT Tigard, OR 97223
7430 SW Varns Street
Tigard, OR 97223 Mr. & Mrs. David Rieker
14504 SW Fern Street
Joel Stevens, CIT Tigard, OR 97223
9660 SW Ventura Court
Tigard, OR 97223 Bonneville Power Admin.
905 NE 11th
Mark F. Mahan, CIT Portland, OR 97232,
11310 SW 91st Court
Tigard, OR 97223 Portland General Electric
121 SW Salmon
Portland, OR 9720`1
Sierra Pacific Development
p.0.B~x 17f
Lake Oswego, OR 97035
Sign-up Sheet
Harry and Judith Jeffery Project Meeting
of June 13, 1996
Name Address Phone
edw 57 ~y9/7
TO: HARRY AND JUDY JEFFERY
FROM: DAVID AND MAVIS RIEKER
SUBJECT: LAND PARTITIONING
DATE: JUNE 10, 1996
In the proposed partitioning of Tax Lot 1100 of Tax Map 2S10-104BC, from one
lot into three tax lots, in itself is not a problem. The livability of having a larger lot is
more desirable to us, but creating three lots from one larger lot does not create the
concern we have with this proposed change.
The concern we have is with the intended use of the two undeveloped lots that
would be split off. If these lots were restricted to single family dwellings only, then the
livability of this neighborhood would remain only slightly altered. If these lots are allowed
to have multiple family units built on them, i.e. duplexes, then it is our firm belief that the
overall value, and livability of this neighborhood would be compromised.
Whenever there are multiple family units intermixed with higher value homes, the
homes seem to suffer on the market. With multiple family dwellings, there is a lack of a
sense of ownership that prevails, and detracts from the single family homes in close
proximity. Along with this lack of ownership, there is quite often a lack of respect for the
property of others.
It is our firm belief that allowing multiple family units on these lots would damage
the serenity and appeal of the surrounding single family homes. With this in mind we will
have to oppose the proposed partitioning at least as far as multiple family development is
concerned.
Respect y,
cc.
City of Tigard, Mark_Roberts
j
Bill and Carrie Bright
I
PLANNING
p C./y1LIVGJNEEHING
Upal"m
I
1
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT
' for
3-LOT MINOR LAND PARTITION &
' SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW
Tax Lot 1100, Map 2S1-4BC
City of Tigard, Oregon
1
1 APPLICANT/OWNERS:'
Harry and Judith Jeffrey
1 14520 S.W. Fern Street
Tigard, Oregon 97223
(LDC JOB NO. 2108)
1
i .
1
1 -
233 S.E. WASHINGTON STREET, HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 PHONE. (503) 648-4061 FAX: (503) 681-7646
area P v1/l, e3 6Q
I~ L
A~A
3
1 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
IkRTITION APPLICATION15e"'57'4) ve-- -4 1j-
'ITY OF TIGARD, 13125 SW Hall
igard, Oregon 97223 - (503) 639-4171 FOR STAFF USE ONLY
CASE NO.
OTHER CASE NO'S: RECEIPT NO.
' 033 SG ~~QS1n.r~ '1~1~•
. 11S`~~ q~ I a3 APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY:
Ll1~1 "7LO U DATE:
t GENERAL INFORMATION Application elements submitted:
'ROPERTY ADDRESS /LOCATION (A) Application form (1)
//11 (B) Owner's signature/written
_ X MAP AND TAX LOT N0. VW,n c~Gt -tA6C_, authorization
CC) (C) Title transfer instrument (l)
TE SIZE (D) assessor's map (1)
CRESS PERTY OWNER/DEED HOLDER (E) Plot plan (pre-app check list)
i2Al, PHO! 5-2-4 oy37 (F) Applicant's statement
,~oi~r_
`ITY 7-1 6 2T ZIP ~7Z23 (pre-app check list)
~PLICANT* a
.-_DDRESS /C'~2y S lF/4v 57` PHONE 5-,414-o437
~TY 7ilp2T~ ZIP q1,7Z2-3 (H) Filing fee (1235)
*When the owner ?nd the applicant are different Z~rll~ Lt 7 oD1e, the applicant must be the Durchaser of record K' I a leasee in possession with written authorization' DATE DETMKI ED TO 3E COMPLETE:
-=om the owner or an agent of the owner with written
•ithorization. The owner(s) must sign this
plication in the space provided on oage two or FINAL DECISION DEADLINE:
tn.mit a written authorization with this application.
COMP. PLAN/ZONE DESIGNATION:
PROPOSAL SL'M~LARY
The owners of record of the subject property
request permission to divide N.P.O. Number:
total area)
' into 3 containing, Planning Director Approval Date:
(No. of parcels n
and. ~J :L yea- (or square
' Feet each). Final Approval Date:
Planning
Engineering
19P/13P Recordation Date and `lumber:
lv,d: 3/88
1
' 3. List any variance, conditional uses, or other land use actions to be considered
as part of this application:
4. Applicants: To have a complete application you will need to submit attachments
described in the attached information sheet at the time you submit this
application.
5. THE APPLICANT(S).SHALL CERTIFY THAT:
A. The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may -be
' attached to or imposed upon the subject property.
B. If the application is granted, -the applicant will exercise the rights
' granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and
limitations of the approval.
C. All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,
' attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the
applicants -so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this
application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are
' false.
D. The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including
the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving
or denying the application.
DATED this day of 19q(O_
SIGNATURES of each owner (eg. husband and wife) of the subject property.
(KSL:pm/0737?)
PLANNING
zu,
233 S.E. WASHINGTON STREET, HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 PHONE: (503) 6484061 FAX: (503) 681-7646
June 26, 1996
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT
APPLICANTS REPRESENTATIVE: Land Development Consultants, Inc.
APPLICANT/OWNER: Harry E. & Judith A. Jeffrey
14520 SW Fern Street
Tigard, OR 97223
REQUEST: 3-Lot Minor Land Partition & Sensitive Lands Review
' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tax Lot 1100, Map 2S1-46C
City of Tigard, Oregon
' SIZE: 1.88 Acres
LOCATION: 14520 SW Fern Street
ZONING DESIGNATION: R-7, Single-Family Residential
' I. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
' A. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
B. The Following Sections of the City of Tigard Community Development Code:
Chapter 18.52 R-7: Single-Family Residential
Chapter 18.84 Sensitive Lands
Chapter 18.88 Solar Access Requirements
' Chapter 18.92 Density Computations
Chapter 18.96 Additional Yard Setback Requirements & Exceptions
Chapter 18.98 Building Height Limitations: Exceptions
Chapter 18.102 Clear Vision Area
Chapter 18.106 Off-Street Parking & Loading
Chapter 18.108 Access, Egress & Circulation
' Chapter 18.162 Land Division: Minor Land Partition
Chapter 18.164 Street & Utility Improvement Standards
1
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
' The subject property is a flag shaped parcel approximately 1.88 acres in size. The property has a
50 foot wide pole fronting on SW Fern Street. The subject property was recently annexed into the
City limits of Tigard and zoned R-7, Single-Family Residential. The subject site is surrounded by
recent single-family residential subdivisions and one to two acre parcels in single-family residential
uses. A Bonneville Power Administration easement is located directly west of the site. An existing
' single-family residence is located in the eastern third of the site. The subject property contains
moderate to steep slopes which increase in elevation from the northwest to the southeast. Vegetation
on the subject property consists of a scattering of trees and grassy areas.
The applicant is requesting approval of a minor land partition and sensitive lands review. The
proposed partition involves the creation of three parcels as depicted on the attached Preliminary Plat
(See Exhibit 6). Proposed Parcel 1 is to be 20,003 square feet in size, proposed Parcel 2 is to be
' 17,496 square feet in size and proposed Parcel 3 is to be 19,997 square feet in size. The existing
residence will be retained on Parcel 1. Proposed Parcel 2 is intended for future single-family
residential use and proposed Parcel 3 is intended for future residential use as a duplex. A proposed
' house plan is attached as Exhibit 5. Parcel 1 is accessed by an easement from Ascension Drive.
Parcels 2 and 3 are proposed flag lots, each with a minimum of 25 feet of frontage on Fern Street.
(Proposed Parcel 3 may obtain access from the proposed subdivision "Hillshire Hollow" directly
adjacent to the south if an easement is obtained). Public utilities are available to serve the proposed
partition, as indicated on the attached Preliminary Utility Plan (See Exhibit 6). A sensitive lands review
is requested due to the existence of slopes of 25% or greater on portions of the subject site. The
attached On-Site Analysis (See Exhibit 6) identifies the location of areas on the subject site which
contain slopes of 25% or greater. Proposed improvements are located outside of these areas.
' III. FINDINGS
A. CITY OF TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
' COMMENT:
Except where specifically required by the Community Development Code, this application is not
required to address goals and policies related to the development of land, since the Plan is
implemented by the, Code.
' B. CITY OF TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE
' CHAPTER 18.52 R-7: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
18.52.030: Permitted Uses
A. Permitted uses in the R-7 district are as follows:
' 1. Single-family detached residential units, at one dwelling per lot;
3. Duplex residential units.
' COMMENT:
The applicant is proposing the creation of a three (3) lot minor land partition. Proposed Parcel 1 will
retain the existing single-family detached residence. Proposed Parcel 2 is intended for future single-
family detached residential use and proposed Parcel 3 is intended for future residential use as a
duplex.
2
18.52.050: Dimensional Requirements
' A. Dimensional requirements in the R-7 district are as follows:
1. The minimum lot area shall be:
a. 5,000 square feet for each detached unit;
b. 10,000 square feet for duplexes; and
' 2. The average minimum lot width shall be:
a. 50 feet for detached unit lots; and
' 3. The maximum lot coverage shall be 80 percent including all buildings and
impervious surfaces;
' 4. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.96 and Section 18.100.130, the
minimum setback requirements are as follows:
a. The front yard setback shall be a minimum of 15 feet;
' c. The side yard setback shall be a minimum of ' five feet except this
provision shall not apply to attached units on the lot line on which the
units are attached;
d. The rear yard setback shall be a minimum of 15 feet;
f. The distance between the property line and the front of the garage shall
be a minimum of 20 feet;
' S. Except as otherwise provided in Chapter 18.98, no building in an R-7 zoning
district shall exceed 35 feet in height; and
6. The minimum landscape requirement shall be 20 percent.
COMMENT:
' The attached preliminary plat (See Exhibit 6) demonstrates that the proposed partition exceeds the
minimum lot size and lot width standards of the R-7 district. Parcel 1 is accessed by a driveway
' easement from Ascension Drive, which is greater than 15 feet in width (See Exhibit 3). Parcels 2 and
3 are proposed to be flag lots with a minimum of 25 feet each of frontage on Fern Street. (Proposed
Parcel 3 may obtain access from the proposed subdivision "Hillshire Hollow" directly adjacent to the
south if an easement is obtained). All proposed lots contain adequate area to site future residences
' in compliance with required setbacks and maximum lot coverage and minimum landscape
requirements.
' CHAPTER 18.84: SENSITIVE LANDS
' 18.84.040 Approval Standards
B. The appropriate approval authority shall approve or approve with conditions _an
application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25 percent or greater or
unstable ground in Subsections 18.84.015 B. and D. based upon findings that all of the
following criteria have been satisfied:
3
COMMENT:
' Portions of the subject property contain slopes of 25 percent or greater. These areas are located in
the eastern third of the site and are identified on the attached On-Site Analysis (See Exhibit 6). An
' existing dwelling and driveway improvements are located in the eastern third of the site. The
applicant is proposing a three (3) lot minor land partition of the subject site. The portion of the
subject site consisting of slopes of 25% or greater will be predominantly contained on the proposed
Parcel 1, which will retain the existing dwelling. Proposed Parcels 2 and 3, which are intended for
future residential uses, predominantly consist of slopes of less than 25%. The applicable criteria are
addressed below.
1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will
not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use;
t COMMENT:
As stated above, the applicant is proposing a three (3) lot minor land partition for residential use. The
' existing dwelling will be retained on the proposed Parcel 1. The only grading proposed is in relation
to future dwelling and driveway construction and utility installation. Limits of grading in relation to the
proposed development are depicted on the attached Preliminary Grading Plan (See Exhibit 6).
' Proposed areas of future development consist predominantly of slopes of less than 25%. The
proposed development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the
establishment of the proposed residential uses.
' 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion,
stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site
effects or hazards to life or property;
' COMMENT:
' As the attached Preliminary Grading Plan (Exhibit 6) demonstrates, the proposed development will
not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site or off-site
effects or hazards to life or property.
3. The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability
and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with
any of the following soil conditions: wet/high water table; high shrink-swell
' capability; compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to-bedrock; and
COMMENT:
' Proposed structures will be sited on land with slopes of less than 25%. The structures will be sited
and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas.
' 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or
development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be
replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.100, landscaping
and Screening.
' COMMENT:
The only vegetation proposed for removal is that necessary to site future residences and driveway
improvements. Portions of the parcels which are not improved will be landscaped in accordance with
Chapter 18.100.
' 4
CHAPTER 18.88: SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS
' 18.88.040 Solar Access for New Development
' C. Design Standard. At least 80 percent of the lots in a development subject to this section
shall comply with one or more of the options in this section; provided, a development
may, but is not required to, use the options in Section 18.88.040 C.2 or C.3 to comply
with this section.
1. Basic Requirement (see Figure 9). A lot complies with this section if it:
' a. Has a north-south dimension of 90 feet or more; and
b. Has a front lot line that is oriented within 30 degrees of a true east-west
' axis.
D.. Exemptions from Design Standard. A development is exempt from Section 18.88.040 C
' if the approval authority finds the applicant has shown that one or more of the following
conditions apply to the site. A development is partially exempt from Section 18.88.040
C to the extent the approval authority finds the applicant has shown that one or more of
' the following conditions apply to a corresponding portion of the site. If' a partial
exemption is granted for a given development, the remainder of the development shall
comply with Section 18.88.040 C.
t 1. Slopes. The site, or a portion of the site for which the exemption is sought, is
sloped 20 percent or more in a direction greater than 45 degrees east or west of
true south, based on a topographic survey by a licensed professional land
' surveyor or USGS or other officially recognized topographic information.
COMMENT:
' The attached On-Site Analysis (See Exhibit 6) depicts the topographic conditions on the subject site.
All proposed parcels predominantly consist of slopes of 20% or greater. The property slopes in a
' westerly direction which is greater than 45 degrees east/west of true south. Therefore, all proposed
parcels are exempt from the basic requirement for solar access.
' CHAPTER 18.92: DENSITY COMPUTATIONS
18.92.020 Density Calculation
' COMMENT:
' The net area of the subject property is 81,893 square feet (1.88 acres). The area of the subject site
which consists of slopes exceeding 25 percent is 17,510 square feet. The subject property does not
contain any drainage ways or floodplain areas. No land is proposed to be dedicated for public park
purposes, public right-of-way or private streets. The existing dwelling will be retained on proposed
Parcel 1. The subject property is zoned R-7, which has a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet for
single-family detached units. The net developable area is 59,383 square feet (Calculation. 81,893
square feet -17,510 square feet - 5,000 square feet = 59,383 square feet). Therefore, the net number
' of units allowable on the subject site is 11 single-family residential units or 5 duplex units (Calculation:
59,383 square feet / 5,000 square feet or 10,000 square feet = 11 single-family residential units or
5 duplex units). This calculation is in compliance with the provisions of Section 18.40.040 (Residential
' Density Transition).
5
18.92.030 Residential Density Transfer
' COMMENT:
' Based on the results of the above density calculation, a residential density transfer is not required in
order to obtain the division of the subject site into three (3) parcels.
' CHAPTER 18.96: ADDITIONAL YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS & EXCEPTIONS
' 18.96.080 Lot Area for Flan Lots
COMMENT:
' Proposed Parcels 2 and 3 are flag lots. Both proposed flag lots exceed the minimum lot size,of 5,000
square feet of the R-7 district. The lot area calculations for Parcels 2 and 3 do not include the pole
portion of the respective flag lot.
' 18.96.090 Front Yard Determination
COMMENT:
The attached Preliminary Plat (Exhibit 6) demonstrates that the proposed flag lots contain adequate
area to locate a residence so that no side yard setback is less than 10 feet. The applicable
' requirements of Section 18.98.030 (Building Heights & Flag Lots) are addressed below.
' CHAPTER 18.98: BUILDING HEIGHT LIMITATIONS: EXCEPTIONS
18.98.030 Buildinq Heights and Flag Lots
' COMMENT:
The two (2) proposed flag lots are being created through a minor land partition. Future dwellings on
the proposed flag lots will comply with the building height limitations of Section 18.98.030 B.
' CHAPTER 18.102: VISUAL CLEARANCE AREAS
COMMENT:
1 Clear vision areas will be maintained in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.102.
' CHAPTER 18.106: OFF-STREET PARKING & LOADING
' COMMENT:
The attached Preliminary Plat (Exhibit 6) demonstrates that the proposed parcels contain adequate
area to accommodate a minimum of two (2) parking spaces for each respective dwelling unit in
' accordance with Section 18.106.030.
6
1
CHAPTER 18.108: ACCESS, EGRESS & CIRCULATION
COMMENT:
' The attached Preliminary Plat (Exhibit 6) demonstrates that the proposed parcels contain adequate
area to accommodate the minimum requirements for vehicular access to dwelling units in accordance
with Section 18.108.070.
1
CHAPTER 18.162: LAND DIVISION: MINOR LAND PARTITION
' 18.162.040 Partition Approval Criteria
A. A request to partition land shall meet all of the following criteria:
1. The proposal conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan;
' COMMENT:
The subject property is designated Medium Density Residential on the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant is proposing the creation of three (3) parcels through a minor land partition for single-
family residential and duplex uses. The proposed development conforms with the City's
Comprehensive Plan, as demonstrated by this report and the attached development plans.
2. The proposed partition complies with all statutory and ordinance requirements
and regulations;
' COMMENT:
As this report and the attached plans demonstrate, the proposed partition complies with all applicable
' statutory and ordinance requirements and regulations.
3. Adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposal;
' COMMENT:
The attached Preliminary Utility Plan demonstrates that adequate public facilities are available to serve
' the proposed partition (See Exhibit 6).
.4. All proposed lots conform to the size and dimensional requirements of this title;
' and
COMMENT:
' The attached Preliminary Plat (Exhibit 6) and the above comments demonstrate that the proposed
partition conforms to the applicable size and dimensional requirements of the City's Community
' Development Code.
5. All proposed improvements meet City and applicable agency standards.
COMMENT:
As this report and the attached plans demonstrate, the proposed development complies with all
' applicable City and agency standards.
t 7
18.162.050: Special Provisions for Lots Created through Partition Process
A. Lot Width:
1. The minimum width of the building envelope area shall meet the lot requirement
of the applicable zoning district.
t COMMENT:
The attached Preliminary Plat (Exhibit 6) demonstrates that the minimum width of proposed building
envelope areas exceeds the minimum lot requirement of the R-7 district.
B. Lot Area:
' 1. The lot area shall be as required by the applicable zoning district. In the case
of a flag lot, the accessway may not be included in the lot area calculation.
' COMMENT:
The attached plans and the above comments demonstrate that the proposed lot areas comply with
' the minimum lot area of the R-7 district.
C. Lot Frontage:
' 1. Each lot created through the partition process shall front a public right-of-way by
at least 15 feet or have a legally recorded minimum 15 foot wide access
easement.
t COMMENT:
' The proposed Parcel 1 is accessed by way of an easement, at least 15 feet wide, to Ascension Drive
(See Exhibits 3 and 6). The proposed Parcels 2 and 3 will have greater than 15 feet of frontage on
Fern Street (See Exhibit 6). (Proposed Parcel 3 may obtain access from the proposed subdivision
' "Hillshire Hollow" directly adjacent to the south if an easement is obtained):
D. Setbacks:
' 1. Setbacks shall be as required by the applicable zoning district.
COMMENT:
The attached Preliminary Plat (Exhibit 6) demonstrates that all proposed lots contain adequate area
to site structures in compliance with the setback requirements of the R-7 district.
' E. Front Yard Determination for Flag Lots:
' 1. When the partitioned lot is a flag lot, the developer may determine the location
of the front yard, provided that no side yard is less than 10 feet. Structures shall
generally be located so as to maximize separation from existing structures.
COMMENT:
The attached Preliminary Plat (Exhibit 6) demonstrates that the proposed flag lots contain adequate
area to locate a residence so that no side yard setback area is less than 10 feet. Future structures
will be generally situated to maximize separation from existing structures.
' 8
F. Screening on Flag Lots:
1. A screen shall be provided along the property line of a lot of record where the
paved drive in an accessway is located within 10 feet of an abutting lot in
' accordance with Section 18.100.080 and 18.100.090. Screening may also be
required to maintain privacy for abutting lots and to provide usable outdoor
recreation areas for proposed development.
' COMMENT:
If determined necessary by the Review Authority, screening will be provided in accordance with
' Sections 18.100.080 and 18.100.090.
G. Fire Protection:
' 1. The fire district may require the installation of a fire hydrant where the length of
an accessway would have a detrimental effect on firefighting capabilities.
' COMMENT:
The subject property is provided fire protection by Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue. The proposed
development will be established in accordance with applicable fire district standards.
H. Reciprocal Easements:
' 1. Where a common drive is to be provided to serve more than one lot, a reciprocal
easement which will ensure access and maintenance rights shall be recorded
' with the approved partition map.
COMMENT:
A reciprocal easement will be provided if a common drive is established.
' I. Accessway:
1. Any Accessway shall comply with the standards set forth in Chapter 18.108,
Access, Egress, and Circulation.
' COMMENT:
t As discussed within this report above, the proposed development complies with the applicable
standards of Chapter 18.108 (Access, Egress and Circulation).
' 18.162.070 Preliminary Application Submission Requirements
COMMENT:
' This report and the attached exhibits and plans provide the details required for preliminary application
submission in accordance with Section 18.162.070.
9
CHAPTER 18.164: STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
18.164.030 Streets
' COMMENT:
According to the Pre-Application Conference Notes (See Exhibit 2), no right-of-way dedication or
' street improvements are required as part of the proposed development. An access easement is
provided for proposed Parcel 1 for ingress/egress from Ascension Drive. Proposed Parcels 2 and
3 will have frontage on Fern Street. (Proposed Parcel 3 may obtain access from the proposed
subdivision "Hillshire Hollow" directly adjacent to the south if an easement is obtained).
' 18.164.040 Blocks
' COMMENT:
This standard does not apply due to the scale of the proposed development.
' 18.164.050 Easements
' COMMENT:
Utility easements will be provided as necessary.
18.164.060 Lots
COMMENT:
' As demonstrated by the attached plans and the above comments, the proposed partition is in
compliance with the applicable dimensional standards of the R-7 district.
' 18.164.070 Sidewalks
' COMMENT:'
According to the Pre-Application Conference Notes (See Exhibit 2), no sidewalks are required as part
of the proposed development.
t 18.164.080 Public Use Areas
' COMMENT:
No public use areas are proposed with, or required by, this development.
' 18.164.090 Sanitary Sewers
' COMMENT:
According to the Pre-Application Conference Notes (See Exhibit 2), the nearest sanitary sewer line
is an 8 inch line located in Fern Street at Ascension Drive. The attached Preliminary Utility Plan (See
' Exhibit 6) demonstrates sanitary sewer service to the proposed partition.
1
1 10
18.164.100 Storm Drainage
1 COMMENT:
According to the Pre-Application Conference Notes (See Exhibit 2), the nearest storm sewer line is
located in Fern Street at Ascension Drive. The attached Preliminary Utility Plan (See Exhibit 6)
demonstrates storm sewer service to the proposed partition.
1 18.164.110 Bikeways
COMMENT:
' The attached Pre-Application Conference Notes (Exhibit 2) indicate that no bikeways are required by
the proposed development.
1 18.164.120 Utilities
COMMENT:
All utility lines will be placed underground. The attached Preliminary Utility Plan (See Exhibit 6)
1 indicates the location of all proposed utilities and related easements.
1 IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the above findings and attached exhibits, the applicant has demonstrated compliance with
the requirements of the relevant sections of the City of Tigard Community Development Code.
1 Therefore, this request should be approved.
1 LDC.2108.5321
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
LIST OF EXHIBITS
' 1. STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED (DOCUMENT NO. 89-57728 IN WASHINGTON
COUNTY BOOK OF RECORDS)
' 2. CITY OF TIGARD PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES DATED MAY 23, 1996
3. LETTER FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT, INC DATED AUGUST 21, 1995
' REGARDING DRIVEWAY EASEMENT
4. DOCUMENTATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING REGARDING PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT
' 5. PROPOSED HOUSE PLAN
6. SLOPE ANALYSIS MAP
DEVELOPMENT PLANS:
Page 1 - Preliminary Plat
Page 2 - Preliminary Grading Plan
' Page 3 - Preliminary Utility Plan
Page 4 - Preliminary Tree Preservation Plan
1
- ~r. #r►.~16d."d 3.f1:il~.~B C+1~~' : t ~.ai_ ,
TICOR TITLE
Cn fNS(JRANCF 89-57728
yl ~j waehington County
ce-N
a.
w p 'STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
WDRl LAN J . WEBING'E• R x
x Jh t Grantor,
conveys and warrants to
4,. e ^I HARRY E. JEFFER7f AND JUDITH T
_Ttl A. JEFFERY, HUSBAND AND WIFE
Grantce~ the following described real property free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein situated in
h CountY. Oregon, to wit:
: ';~"`s, ~ { TnSHIt^'rGi'ON ,c•},~rx
SEE 'LEGAL DESCRIPT'ION' ATTACHED HIME O AND BY RE ICE"MADE A PART HEREOF.
3 A
rfi~ THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLI-
CABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIR-
ING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
r. • d TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. The said property is free from encumbrances except POWERS OF THE UNIFIED SEv7zr
a AGEiICY, ODMITICNS, RESTRICTIONS, FASFNENTS AND PUAIERS OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS IF ANY
The true consideration for this conveyance is S 29,000.00 (Here eomPly with the requirements of ORS 93.030) C-
( s
,t .c~
Dated this 27 day of November 19 89 'YI'a4
t A'OR7 J. !pm
I 2 ;r
,t.~qr+•ti ;fir ~ ~ I-~
State of Diesca- •
, oun}y of Washington State of Oregon, ounty of
IMAMS Th foregoing ihstK,tnent was acknowledged before me this The foregoing nstrumcnt was acknowledged before me this
2 November _
;rfii. Q{ i Gay of • 19by day of 19' by
jT11 Norma>l J Webinaer President and ;
t;,£', !IS, s c Secretary of
Y:.• °r4"t f(, ` corporation,
I~/ ' on behalf of the corporation.
o1C- try Public for Oregon
My commission expires: 1-13-91 Notary Public for Oregon
My commission expires:
^ ti
q <1 WARRANTY DEED This Space Reserved for Recorder's Use
~ I
NORMAN J. WEBING R
-•r~ 1:111\111
,s{ HARRY E. JEFFERY JUDITH A. JF.FFFRY
Until a change is requested, all tax statements shall be
:r sent to the following address:
'J Ft11RRY E. JEFFERY r~ [raSHINGTON COUNTY
13975-A S.W. PACIFIC HWY7'; R£QL A70.°~R7*Y T,?C.s:'I!~ 'rte
TIGARD, OREGON 97223 Q~•¢-
t Escrow No. 144383 Title No. 144383 = PAID -DA'i E
r `
After recording return to:
i HARRY E. JEFFERY
13975-A S.W. PACIFIC HWY EXHIBIT N0.
TIGARD, OREGON 97223
s
Ticor Form Na 137 Statutory Warranty Deed 8/85
d
Y.
{
O_)
} DESCRIPTION SHEET c12
e See Page 1 for vesting and encumbrances, if any. 4s'
n,
Description of the tract of land which is the subject of this
report:1
A portion of Lot 16 and Lot 17, HANDY ACRES, a plat of record in the
Northwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of
the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, said portion
being more particularly described as fellows:
Beginning at a point on the North line of said Lot 16, which bears
North 89° 37' 30" East 100.00 feet from the Northwest corner
thereof; and running thence along said North Line, North 89° 37' 30' East 50.00 feet; thence parallel with and 150.00 feet Easterly of
the West line of said Lot 16, South 00°43' West 435.76 feet; thence
North 890 43' 30" East 250.00 feet to a point on the East line of
said Lot, 17; thence along said East line, South 000 43' West 200.00 .14
feet to the Southeast corner thereof; thence along the South lines
of Lots 16 and 17, said HANDY ACRES, South 890 43' 30" West 300.06
feet? to a point which bears North 89° 43' 30" East 100.00 feet from `
the Southwest corner of said Lot 16; thence parallel with the West
line thereof, North 000 43' East 635.67 feet to the point of 1
I` beginning.---------------------------------------------------------r..
'A
STATE OF OREGON
County SS
of weshingtonj.x~`ti
I Assossmonl •~i. .
1, Donald w Masan,
Rocordor of con'
and laxafoor r an4 Fi'CK ~o.~~Qp cenity that
v +
eyancos f sad c~° l,. 6 tlg u recowed
the wnn,n v>atrumant o yf,X~Vunty. t s r:
and rocord9tl.M'bonk al~t(eo_+ds,, •
of j `..~t~s
i a"W: -Mason fp foctor ~)S =.I
Ex•
I
µ5O.%%28 v 1
Goc : 47..00
}trrt:: 7.2..629 t.
1 1 / 28 / 1989 :)'l : 40: 10YM
w ^~u- t
Report No. 34-144383 KR/mlw Con't Preliminary Report Only
NOV1 ('89)
4 J
t ~
t.
D Raw
' CITY OF 71GARD
CIT`Y OF TIGARD
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
RESIDENTIAL
DATE: S Wake- s
SIFF: (3
41LICANT: N aH AGENT:
y37'
7 Phone: L_ 1
'ROPERTY LOCATION:
OORESS: I L4 rJ 20 SUJ 4e~K S
~AX MAPITAX LOT: Z S 10 G off- 110
JJESSARY APPLICATION(S):
I cu4 Q u -e u-
JPOSAL DESCRIPTION: a sr s a C~ 5 WL~j a
LAO a wt e i k *It V-e'4 _ i
PREHENSIVE
I MN !Q t~ 5; J~,~S~ l , l/~a /~6- ~ Z /c! QG
,IA~IN DESIGNATION: ,d )Ltt,411 oar, / l Gil
]ING DESIGNATION: 1
;I ZEN INVOLVEMENT W-e5~ FACILITATOR:
'EJA AREA: PHONE: (5031
)ING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Fof s
10/000
-1inimum lot size:_5r_16aq. ft. -Average lot ~rvidth: -5;4 :ft. Maximum buildi a height: ~sfT.
~la cks: front 15 ft. side 10 ft. rear, /S ftG"~ , corner ft. from street.
iViaximum site coverage: LSD °,'o Minimum landscaped or natural vegetat i ion area: .
Z6
' (Refer to Code Section 18.
EXHIBIT NO..
1 .
Y Of TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 1 of 9
tDITo-,[ NAL AL REQUIREMENT
Minimum lot frontage: 25 feet unless lot is created through the minor land partition process. Lots created
' as part of a partition must have a minimum of 15 feet of frontage or have a minimum 15 foot wide access
easement.
The depth of all lots shall not exceed 2'/2 times the average width, unless the parcel is less than 1 %Z times .
the minimum lot size of the applicable zoning district. (Refer to Code Section 18.164.060 Lots)
iEC
• Streets: ~ feet from the centerline of
• Established areas: feet from
t Lower intensi zones: lit feet, along the site's boundary.
• Flag lot: 10 foot side yard setbac .
' ro of ine ots:- minimum toot separation between buildings.
Multi-family residential building separation: (Refer to Code Section 18.96.030)
Accessory structures up to 528 square feet in size'may be pon lots less than 2.5 acres in size
foet minimum setback from side and rear
' Accessory structure up to 1000 square feet on parcels of at least 2.5 acres in size
(See applicable zoning district setbacks for primary structures.)
IJLDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS
Ma ' ti at of 30 feet in R-1, R-2, R-3.5 and R-4.5 zones.
Maximum height of 35 feet in R-7 and R-12 zones.
' btaximum erg of Beet in the R-25 zone.
Maximum height of 60 feet in the R-40 zone.
~G LOT BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS
Maximum height of 11/2 stories or 25 feet, whichever is less in most zones; 2'/ stories, or 35 feet in R-7, R-
12, R-25 or R-40 zones provided that the standards of Code Section 18.98.030(8) are met.
tIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULATION
The Net Residential Units allowed on a particular site may be calculated by dividing the net area of the
' developable land by the minimum number of square feet required per dweilina unit as specified by the
applicable zonina desienaticn. Net deve!opment area is calculated by subtracting the following land areas;
from the gross site area:
1. All sensitive lands areas inc!udina:
a. Lard within the 100 year loodplain.
i1 b. Slopes exceeding 250,10.
C. Drinageways.
2. Land dedicated for park purposes.
3. Puclic right-of-way dedication.
4. r.11 land to be provided for crivate streets (includes accessways through parking areas).
(Refer to Code Section 18.92)
~CKS
The perimeter of blocks forme by streets shall not exceed 1,800 feet measured along the right-of-Way line
except where street location is precluded by natural topography, wetlands or other bodies of water or, pre-
existing development.
Y OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Votes Page 2 of
When block lengths greater than 600 feet are permitted, pedestrian/bikeways shall be provided through the
block.
(Refer to Code Section 18.164.040)
~SIDENTIAL DENSITY TRANSFER
The City of Tigard allows a Residential Density Transfer of up to 25% of the units that could otherwise have
been developed on sensitive lands areas listed in (1.) above which may be applied to the developable
portion of the site.
(Refer to Code Section 18.92.030).
It is the responsibility of the applicant for a residential development application to provide a detailed
calculation for both the permitted residential density and the requested density transfer.
kIDENTIAL'DENSITY TRANSITION
Regardless of the allowed housing density in a zoning district, any property within 100 feet of a designated
established area shall not be developed at a density greater than 125 percent of the maximum
Comprehensive Plan designation (not zoning) of the adjacent parcel. Transition area applies to any
property which is a designated established area. The subject property is designated as an
area. The subject property is adjoined by established/developing/areas to the north, south, east and west.
URE STREET PLAN AND EXTENSION OF STREETS
1. A future street plan shall:
a. Be filed by the applicant in conjunction with an application for a subdivision or partition. The
' plan shall show the pattern of existing and proposed future streets from the boundaries of
the proposed land division and shall include boundaries of the proposed land division and
shall include other parcels within 200 feet surrounding and adjacent to the proposed land
' division.
b. Identify existing or proposed bus routes, pullouts or ether transit facilities, bicycle routes and
pedestrian facilities on or within 500 feet of the site.
' 2. Where necessary to give access or permit a satisfactory future division of adjoining land, streets
shall be extended to the boundary lines of the tract to be developed.
(Refer to Code Section 18.164.03
;SIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SOLAR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS
All subdivisions and minor oartitions are subject to solar access requirements. These requirements state
that a minimum of 80% of all lots created must be oriented for solar accessibility. The basic standard.
which determines soiar accessibility, requires that
c0io of total number of proposed lots:
1. Demonstrate a north-south dimension of at least 90 feet.
' 2. Demonstrate a front lot line orientation within 30 degrees of a true east-,vest axis.
r.
The total or partial exemption of .a site from the solar access `
' requirement may be approved for the following reasons:
i
}
1. East, west or ncrh slopes steeper than 20%.
2. Of--site shade sources (structures, vegetation, topography).
3. On-site shade sources (vegetation).
)F TIGARD Pre-Applicition Conference Votes
Adjustments allowing a reductionof he 80% solar lot design •
requirement may be made for the following reasons:
1. Reduced density or an increased cost of at least five percent due to either.
a. East, west or north slope greater than 10%.
' b. Significant natural feature.
C. Existing road or lotting pattern.
d. Public easement or right-of-way.
' 2. Reduction in important development amenities.
3. Pre-existing shade (vegetation).
ASE NOTE: Maps and text are required which are sufficient to show that the development complies with
the solar design standards, or that specific lots should be exempted or adjusted out. The
following items shall be included in the analysis:
1. The north-south lot dimension and front lot line orientation of each proposed lot.
2. Protected solar building lines and relevant building site restrictions, if applicable.
3. For the purpose of identifying trees related to exemption requests, a map showing existing trees
which are at least 30 feet tall and over 6 inches diameter at a point 4 feet above grade shall be
submitted. This map shall include the following:
a. Height.
' b. Diameter.
C. Species.
d. A statement declaring that they are to be retained.
' 4. Copies of all private restrictions relating to solar access.
' The design characteristics of a developed solar-oriented lot are high levels of wintertime sun striking the
scuth walls and roofs of the house, house orientation maximizing south window area, and a south-sloping
roof area. To achieve this, one may utilize the foilcwing:
1. Protected Solar Building Line - The solar building line must:
' a. Be oriented to within 30 degrees cf a true east-west axis.
b. Provide a minimum distance of 70 feet from the middle of the Ict to the south property line.
C. Provide a minimum distance of 45 feet from the northernmost buildable boundary of the
subject lot to the north property line.
2. Performance Options - There are two performance options which may be utilized as follows:
a. The house to be oriented within 30. degrees of an east-west axis and have at least 80% of
the ground floors south wall protected from shade.
At least 32°.'a of the glass and 500 square feet of the roof area face south -and -be
from shade.
' Please contact the Building Division for further information regarding the Protected Solar
Building Line and Performance Options relating to building height and construction.
Of TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 9
IRKING AND ACCESS
All parking areas and driveways must be paved.
' Single family: Requires 2off-street arkin s aces er dwellin u .
u tp a mi y: equires 1.5 parking spaces per unit for 1 bedroom.
' Requires 2 parking spaces per unit for 1+ bedrooms.
Multi-family d ling units with more than 10 required spaces shall provide parking for the use of guests
and shall consist \symbol of the total required parking. (Refer to Code Section 18.106.030)
No more than 4equired spaces may be designated and/or dimensioned as compact spaces.
' Parking stalls shaensioned as follows:
• Stapar ' g space dimensions: 8 ft. 8 inches X 18 ft.
• Coarkin space dimensions: 8 ft. X 15 ft.
• Haed pa ing: -All parking areas shall provide appropriately located and
dimd disable erson parking spaces. The minimum number of disabled person
' parces to be pr ided, as well as the parking stall dimensions, are mandated by the
Amwith Disabilities ct (ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped
' parce symbol shall b ainted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign
shasted.
31YCLE RACKS
Bicycle racks ar required for multi-family, commer cial and industrial developments. Bicycle racks shall be
located in areas pr cted from automobile traffic and in convenient locations. Bicycle parking spaces shall
' be orovided on the bas of one space for every fifteen (15) required vehicular parking spaces.
Minimum number of access Minimum access width:
' Maximum access width: Minimum pavement width:
;SQUIRED WALKWA OCATION
' Within all attached h sing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential
dwelling shall be conned, d by walkway to the vehicular parking area, common open space and recreation
facilities.
VAR VIS►ON AREA
The City requires that clear vision areas be maintained between three and eight feet in heient at
road/driveway, road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area
decends upon the abutting street's functional classification.
(Refer to Code Section 18.102)
BERING AND SCREENI
In order to increase priv ~ y and :o either reduce or eliminate adverse noise or visual impacts. between
adiacent developments, es, cially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas
along certain site perimeters. equired buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Suffer
' areas must be occupied by.a mi ~ure of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve
a balance Etween vertical and rizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be
required; these are often advisable e`en it not required by the Code. The required 'buffer areas may cnl~~
be occupied by vegetaticn. fences. utiliiMs, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area
' materials and sizes may be found in the C munity Development Code. (Refer to Code Chapter 18.100)
Y OF TIGARD Pre•Appik3tion Conference Notes Page 5 of
The required buffer width\northundary. licable to your proposal area ar*s follows:
ft. alonfL along east boundary.
ft. alonary. ft. along west boundary.
In addition, sight obscuring screening is required along
7REET TREES
' Street trees are required for all developments fronting on a public or private street as well as driveways
which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or
on private property within six feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper
of at least two inches when measured four feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet
apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on
regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division.
' A minimum of one tree for every seven parking spaces must be planted in and around all parking areas in
order to provide a vegetative canopy effect. Landscaped parking areas shall include special design
features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the
use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters. For detailed information on design
requirements for parking areas and accesses. (Refer to Cade Chapters 18.100, 18.106 and 18.108
JE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS
A tree pan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be
' provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for
a subdivision, major partition, site development review, planned development or conditional. use is
filed. Protection is preferred over removal where possible.
' The tree plan shall include the following:
Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as
significant by the city;
Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in
' caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.150.070.D.
according to the following standards:
' Retainaae of less than 25 percent or existino trees over 12 inches in caliper requires a
mitigation program according to Section 183. 1 50.070.D. of no net loss of trees;
Retainage of from 25 to 50 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires
that vwo-thirds of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section
18.150.070. D;
1
Retainage or from 50 to 75 percent of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires
that 50 percent of the trees to be removed be mitigated according to Section
18.150.070.,.;
Retainage of 75 peresr;t er greater of: existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires
' no mitigation;
Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; and
A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to
protect trees during and after construction.
TIGARD Pre•Aoplication Conference .Votes Page 6 of 3
!nU71 ::;nd:::n.f':mm'~ y27ifTtnt Eev=
I
Trees removed within the period of one (1) year prior to a development application listed above will
' be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section
18.150.070.D.
(Refer to Code Section 18.150.025)
LIGATION
Replacement of a tree shall take place according to the following guidelines:
' > A replacement tree shall be a substantially similar species considering site
characteristics.
> If a replacement tree of the species of the tree removed or damages is not reasonably
' available, the Director may allow replacement with a different species of equivalent
natural resource value.
> If a replacement tree of the size cut is not reasonably available on the local market or
' would not be viable, the Director shall require replacement with more than one tree in
accordance with the following formula:
> The number of replacement trees required :shall be determined by dividing the estimated
' caliper size of the tree removed or damaged, by the caliper size of the largest
reasonably available replacement trees. If this number of trees cannot be viably located
on the subject property, the Director may require one (1) or more replacement trees to
' be planted on other property within the city, either public property or, with the consent
of the owner, private property.
' > The planting of a replacement tree shall take place in a manner reasonably calculated to
allow growth to maturity.
' In lieu of tree replacement under Subsection D of this section, a party may, with the consent of the
o compensate the City for its costs in performing such tree replacement.
Director, elect to'
t (Refer to Code Section 18.150.070 (D)
IGNS
Sign permits must obtained prior to installation of any sign in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign
Permits" handout is ava' le upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code standards may be
permitted if the sign propcsa reviewed as part of a deve!ooment review application. Alternatively, a Sign
' Code `xceptien application may e filed for review before the Hearings Officer.
SITIVE LANDS
T .he Code provides regulations for lands which are potentially unsuitable for development due to area s
within the 100-year floodolain, natural drainageways, wetland areas, on slopes in excess of 25 percent. or
on unstable ground. Staff will attempt to ore!iminarily identify sensitive lands areas at the ore-application
' conference based on available information. HOWEVER, the resoonsibili to precisely identify sensitive
lards areas and their boundaries is the responsibility of the applicant Areas meetine the definitions er
sensitive lands must be cleariv indicated on plans submitted with the development application.
' (Refer to Code Chapter 18.84)
Chapter 18.84 also provides reculations for the use. protection, or modification of sensitive !ands are: s..
' R=sidential d-eva'-corrent is prohibited within floodoiains. In most cases. dedication of 1C0-year flecdolain 1
areas to the City fcr cark and open space areas is required as a condi'lcn of the aooroval of a deve!eor„ent
application.
f OF TIGAAD Pre•Appiication Canierence Notes Page 7 or 9
URRATIVE •
The applicant shall submit a narrative which provides findings for all applicable approval standards. Failure
t to provide a narrative or adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete
and delay review of the proposal. Applicant should review code for applicable criteria.
✓r85z- 1'e-7
'JOE SECTIONS 18.80 18.98 _ 18.114 _ 18.150
8.84~fps6~ 18.100 _ 18.116 _ 1 .160
_ 18.88 _ 18.102 _ 18.120 .162 L.-f vl't
_18.92 _18.106 18.130 _18.164
18.96 _ 18.108 _ 18.134
IIGHBORHOOD MEETING
The applicant shall notify all property owners within 250 feet and the appropriate CIT Facilitator of their
proposal. A minimum of 2 weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please
review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice.
YCLING
Applicant sho contact franchise hauler for review and approval of site servicing compatibility with
Pride Disposal's v icles. CONTACT PERSON: Lenny Hing with Pride Disposal at (503) 625-6177.
' (Refer to Code Section 116)
ITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS:
I SeuSrt~~ve --~Lu~S ~Qt~~2C(l I S qb(/(V- - j
VQ Q` 42 ~d
ee S [o f o ~~--LP
1
PCEDU'RE
Aeminis:-ative Scarf Review.
Pubic he-=rinc before the Land Use Hearlnos Officer.
Pubiic ; ,earinc before -he P!annina Commission.
Public' ;,earinc before the Panning Commission with the Commission
:mak:nc a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council.
' An additicnal public hearing s^all be held by the City Council.
(Of TIGARO Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 9
APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS
' All applications must be accepted by a Planning Division staff member of the Community Development
Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dro ped
off at the counter without Planning Division 'acceptance may be returned. Applications submitted
' after 4:30 P.M. on Thursday will be batched for processing with the following week's applications.
Applications will NOT be accepted after 3:00 P.M. on Fridays`or 4:30 on other days.
' Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 8.5 by 11 inches. One 8.5 inch
by 11 inch ma of a proposed project should be submitted for attachment to the staff report or
administrative decision. Application with unfolded maps shall not be accepted.
' The Planning Division and Engineering Division will perform a review of the
preliminary application and will
determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the
' applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required.
The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60' days after an
' application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or
protracted issues or requiring review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written
' recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10, to 20
day public appeal period follows,all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the
Tigard KK><~ wtc~/5S} A basic flow chart which illustrates the review process is
' available from the ' nning Division upon request.
This pre-application conference and the notes of the conference are intended to inform the prospective
' applicant of the primary Community Development Code requirements applicable to the potential
development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the
opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site.
' PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes nn cover all Code requirements and
aspects of good site planning that should apply to the
development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide
' information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of
the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that
a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community
' Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative. to
Code requirements prior to submitting an application.
' :ditionai ore-aeelication conference( s) isiare required if an aoolication(s) is/are to be submitted more than
six months following this pre-appiication conference, unless the additional conference(s) is deemed as
unnecessary by the Planning Division.
PREPARED BY: GCCI~
CITY OF TiGAnD F! 4NNING DIVISION
' PHONE: (503) 639-1171
FAX: (503) 08"!-7297
r-•n_
:c..J.-. C. .-s:
se-:cn :.ea.-:-r erc;
Y OF TIGARO Pra•Apalication Canierence Naus Page 9 ai 2
I 1(00
City of Tigard, Oregon
' PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES
ENGINEERING SECTION
~BLIC FACILITIES
The purpose of the pre-application conference is to:
' (1.) Identify applicable Comprehensive Plan policies and ordinance provisions.
(2.) To provide City staff an opportunity to comment on specific concerns.
(3.) To review the Land Use Application review process with the applicant and to identify who the
' final decision making authority shall be ','or 'the application.
The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant
will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be
no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City stair until all concerned
' commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on
the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements
that may be required as a condition of development approval fcr your proposed project.
' Right-cf-wav dedication:
' The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public:
(1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-cf-
way width as specified by the Community Development Code, or
' (2.) For the creation of new streets.
Approval of a development application fcr this site will require right-of-way dedication for:
~,r) tc feet from c_-rter'ire.
'o feet from c=,;.ted1ne.
i
to feet from certZrline.
S'Lr=mar ir-ncrcye'"^er'-,_'
Itr will be ~
( Su ce: ImprO /c. ~cni:S P/ rcC..SSGN aiCng
' (2.) street impro ei ie^ts ,`I II be nec:.ssary along
(J'.) qtr. °t If"'Crc~ :~?1Er:S SClail 'r.c;,,:ce of pavement frcfr Centerline. Clus -the
' Irstailcticn of C::rb ands CL "Le : s. Sic r^; sc.%,ers. : ncercroL:nC placement cf ui iw/ wires (a fee
may b..° CCilec"=.ed it dete.'r~ iii icC
~ ^ ?C•cfcCriaic b.y Ti',e L;1Qifle'criRC Le,oai f'ent; a ilVe-iOGt `P/ICe
' sidewalk ~C:Ce`,'lcliCS may be recuireg+ tC be ','/iC°f Gn ar;: plans cr majGr C.^IIEC;Cf Sir=etS. Of in i( c
Central Business District). ne~es~ar/ scree: Sigr:s. streetlights, and a t:/o year s;reetlighting fee.
71G,;A0 ?r e•ApOication Conference dotes ?age 1 ai 3
I In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not current)
rY Y
practical, the street improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development
approval may be specified which requires the property owner(s) to execute a non-remonstrance
agreement which waives the property owner's right to remonstrate against the formation of a local
improvement district formed to improve:
0 Sv`1
1 (2.)
' Pedestrianwavs/bikewavs:
t
' Sanitarv Sewers:
The nearest sanitary se r line to this property is a(n) inch line which is located in
' F -J--O J ~ tJS•a~( M.- The proposed development must be connected to a
public sanitary sewer. I is the developer's respensibi!ity to
V- / L4KIfa NVU t u1u~ i t
~!~tY.~ T►6 Sty 4 Sit ~~u.~R,O.~ I i
Sucoly:
The kL W2ter C-~S-Z z - Phone:(503) (9;~ l provides public water service in
the area of this site. The District should be contacted for information regarding water supply for your
proposed deve!cpment.
c;re rctecticn:
Iualaun Valley Fire- and Resc::e --I_,r.c: kCCT..ccc.. Gene E:;-Chill, (503) 026-2469) provides ;Ire
protection serAces within ;he Ci;;i Tcarc. The District should be contacted for information
ciardir:c the adequacy of circula:i-cn /sterns. tf'-= ^°°d for fir-e hydrants, or other Cuesticrls re!ated o
fire prc,ecticn.
Other Acencv Perrr•:=;:
0"1
TIGARO Pre•A.-oii=iar. C,;nierence Vates Page 2,r
11r; apr.7.tet . :a6^.
I
Slorm sewer improvemen :
' S'S~-cam ►~S ~-tJ 11~►~5~4.!
~ORM WATER QUALITY
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water [Management (SWM) regulations established by the
Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which
requires the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove
65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from
newly created impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant
to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will
use discretion in determining whether cr nct the fee in-lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed. it will
be based upon the amount of new imcervious surfaces created; for every 2,640 square feet, or
' portion thereof, the fee shall be S180.00. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water
quality facility shall be submitted with the development application.
RAFFIC IMPACT FEES
' In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) ordinance. The Traffic
Impact Fee procram collects fees frcm new development based on the development's proiected
impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon
' the number of trips which are projected m result frcm the proposed development. The calculation of
the TIF is based on the proposed use of the land. the size of the project, and a general use based fee
category. The TIF shall be c~-!c:slated at the time of building permit issuance. In limited
' circumstances. payment of the TIF may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy
permit. Deferral of the payment until cccu-pan.cy is permissible only when the TIF is greater than
' S5,C00.00.
~EET OPENING PERMIT
" ,:~IIC riche-cT--way. or s,nail. commence. until the a.ppiicart has
No wcrk 5-hail be ce•'-'crr-led wi[hln Y
cbtained s:ree. --c°ninc permit rcm :`:e E,cir.eering c.'ecartment.
SHED F-L OOR ELEVA T iCNS
All crc-,=^;s that r-cL;Ire c cradfnc ..a.. piss r:..-,uir: thai tre applicant shall submit a typical hoer cian
for each !ct. This ricer Clan shail ;%cicas ti e elevat.pns of the four corners of that plan along with
e!e`/ations at the corner of each lot.
PREPARED 6Y:--=--~
=NGiNEERING DEPARTiME NT
Phone. 503) 639--.171
13c ef,; Fax: ;503) 684=7297
i IGAAO Pre•dooiication cinierence dotes Page 3 ai 3
CITY OF TIGARD
COMPOUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTiMENT
' APPLICATION CHECKLIST crnr of noa,Rc
The items on the checklist below are required for the succesful completion of your
' application submission requirements. This checklist identifies what is required to
be submitted with your application. This sheet MUST be returned and submitted
with all other applicable materials at the time you submit your land use application.
' See your application for further explanation of these items or call the City of Tigard
Planning Division at (503) 63n-4171.
staff: Date: S Z3
i APPLICAMON & RELNTEO OCCLImEN T (S) SL:B.mITTAL REQURE.I.IENTS INCLUOE NIARKE D ITEMSI~l
A) Application form (1 copy)
' B) Owner's signature written authorization
C) Title transfer instrument/or ;rant deed
' D) applicant's statement .No. or Copies
E) Filin, Fee
23.56 u~~ d(~ i
SITE-SPECIFIC ,'~I,AP(S)/PL-\N(S) SUB1-IITTAL REQUIRE.IoENTS INCLUDE MARKM i T EMS
' A) Site Information showing: No. of Copies (IJ ~6
1. Vicinity maps
2. Site size & dimensions
3. Contour lines (2 rt at 0-i0`0 or S ft for grades > 10'10)
Drainage patterns, courses, and ponds -
' S. Locations or natural hazard areas including: c
(a) Fioodplain areas G
(b) ;lopes in excess or 23'.0
(c) Uns;aoie around
(d) areas with hian seasonai `.eater 'able
(e) areas `,viih Severe :oll eresion .0ctertlal
' (f) areas having Severeiv weak foundation Solis
o. Location cf resource area. as shown en the Como renersive
' Nlao lnvertori including:
(a) Wildlife 'haoitacs
(b) Wetlands -
Other :ice re=cures:
(a) Rock outcrcopin,s -
(b) I ree: `.vlth " - calloer TaZsL,r?^ = fe : 'rom ?round ;eve!
S. i__cation or existing ar::C:urc_ and their uses
LOC3i;on and -./oe cf -n and o~,-:,te noise _0 :rCeS
J. Locaiicn cr exiSiine l dHcies arc eases e!,cS
T i. _,-,c_ticn of existing deckc sec riaht-cf-•.va`;S ~
?Act: ZF
' 8) Site Dev to meat Plan Indicatin : No. or Copies
' 1: The p oposed site and surrounding properties C3
2 Contou line intervals ❑
3. The Iota 'on, dimensions and names of all:
' (a) Exist' g & platted streets & other public ways and
ease nts on the site and on adjoining properties ❑
(b) Propos d streets or other public ways & easements
' on the s e a
(c) Alternati routes of dead end or proposed streets
that requir future extension ❑
' 4. The location and dimension of:
(a) Entrances an' exits on the site ❑
(b) Parkin; and circulation areas ❑
(c) Loading and services. area c
(d) Pedestrian and bicycle circulation c
(e) Outdoor comma` areas
' (f) Above ground utilities
5. The location, dimensions`& setback distances of all:
(a) Existing permanent structures, improvements, utilities, and
easements which are located on the site and on adjacent
property within 25 fee\of the site ❑
' (b) Proposed structures, improvements, utilities and easements
on the site ❑
o. Storm drainage facilities and an ysis of downstream conditions ❑
' 7. Sanitary sewer facilities ❑
3. The location areas to be landscape
9. The location and type of outdoor li; tin; considering crime
preventicn techniques C3
10. The location of mailboxes c
i 1. The location of ail structures and their or ntation
' 12. Existing or proposed sewer reimbursement agreements ❑
C) Grading Plan Indicating: No. of Copies
' e _ice develccm. ent oian shaii ir.c`cde a racir,a oian at the same scale
as the site anaivsis drawings and :nail ccnca:n ti".e ioiicwim, I.-for.-nation:
The Iccation and extent ;c ~vr;icn °radlr_g iil cake place indic atlne:
(a) Gereral contour Tines
' (b) ~;oce rali0~ -
(c) Scii szaoiiizacion crccosai(s)
(d) koproxinn-ace time of year for the proposed site development
statemi~ent from a revstered engineer suocorted by data -actual
substanciatine:
(a) Suo5u^ace exPloraiicr.and Qeocedc-Inical en°ineerir~; r?cOrr -
-(b) The vaii6cv of Sanicar: ;aver and storm crainage service proposals =
(c) Tat :I Problem. ::v;il be Mi:i. =te^ and how ;hev %viil be r,iicigaced
ICE
' D) Archit ral Drawindicatin of Copies
The site de lopment plan proposal shall include:
' 1. Floor plans ' dicating the square footage of all structures
proposed for eon-site
' 2. Typical elevation rawings or each structure
E) Landsca Plan Indicatin : No. of Copies
The landsc \~d shall be drawn at the same scale of the site
analysis plrger scale if necessary and shall indicate:
' 1. Desca irrigation system where applicable
Y
2. Locatei, t or fences, buffers and sc-eenings c
' 3. Locatrraces, decks, shelters, play areas, and common open spaces 0
Locat , size a species Or existing and proposed plant materials
5. Landrative whi h also addresses:
(a) itions ontrol measur that will be used
' F) Si-n Drawin ❑
Sign drawings s, -il be submitted in accordance with Chapter 18. 114
' or the Code as part of the Site Development Review or prior to obtaining
a Building Permit to construct a sign.
' Q Traffic Generation Estimate:
H) Preliminarv Partitioniloo Adiustment .\,1ap IndicatinNo. of Copies 1 d
' 1. The owner or the subjec- parcel
2. The owner's authorized agent _
3. The map scaie (20,50,100 or 200 feet- 1) inch north arrow and date
' Description or parcel loc=lion and boundaries
5. Loc2don, widen. and names cf :ireeCs, e:.se ent: and other public
ways wizi iin and adjacent co line parce! _
' d. Location of ail permanent buiidings on and wanin 25 'e-_t or ail
crooerty lines
Lbcaticr, and width or all water cour_es ~
o. LoC?tiOn Of awl tr_es within Of Qr23Cer C=IICer at = .e°C above
Qrour,d level f~
9. All _iooes erearer than 0
0. Lccadcn or exis;ine u lines and utility easernents r~
For major iznd baritier, which creates a bubiic sz,-eet:
(a) i ne prCCOsed rien[ Jr-way IOcaCich an,d width ~
1 (b) A sCsle^~ c: i4-saC:iOn of the brcCOs2~ ,ir°°r ^I1;5 anV esenI,e Kr'J
12 . %.r,y acciica'Cie deed, resz;ic:ions f/
' 13. "ide^C_ -i..a: land pamticn will not preclude a:iicient- fUCUre lard
r''ivi-c:cn wi^erD abbllC~bl2 _
' 1) Subdivisio Preliminaslat ,Ma and Data Indicatin : of Copies
' I. Scale a aling 30,50,100 or 200 feet to the inch and limited to one
phase pe sheet c
The propo d name or the subdivision C
3. Vicinity ma showing property's relationship to arterial and
collector stree s C
4.-Names, addres s and telephone numbers of the owner, developer,
t engineer, survey r and designer (as applicable) c
5. Date of applicati C
6. Boundary lines or 6ct to be subdivided C
' Niames or adjacent subdivision or names or recorded owners or
adjoining parcels or ~p-subdivided land
8. Contour lines re!ated t\q a City-established benchmark at ?-root intervals
' for 0-1000 grades -reate\ than 10
9 The purpose, location, type and size or all the following (within and
adjacent to the proposed subdivision):
' (a) Public and private right-or-ways and easements c
(b) Public and private sanitary and storm sewer lines . C
(c) Domestic water mains including fire hydrants C
' (d) Nlajor power telephone transmission lines (50,000 volts or greater) C
(e) Watercourses \ _
M Deed reservations for parks,\open spaces, pathways and other
' land encumbrances
10. Approximate plan and profiles or proposed sanitary and storm sewers
with grades and pipe sizes indicated:.on the plans _ 77
' 11. Plan or the proposed water distribution system, snowing pipe sizes and
the location or valves and fire hydrants, _
' 12. Approximate centerline profiles showing the finished grade of ail streets
including Street extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of
the proposed subdivision _
' 1;. Scaled cross sections or proposed street right-of-wav(s)
14. The location or all areas subject to inundation or storm water overflow
15. Location, width & direction or fiow or all water courses & crainaee-wavs C
' 16. -ne proposed lot configurations, aocroximace`-lot dimensicris andV
i.Cc :umbers. Where lots are to be used for purpose: c[her than
resice^[iai, is :.ail ~-e incic2ced u^on suc~ lots.
^2 ioczclcn vi 2111 :r6e5 `.vich a ciarne[er o fric ~e5 or gra_ier rr..e?5ureC at
'e°[ above ground ie`ie!, and Ih.t' IcCaticn of prGF,o520 ;re° Llan[In?5
13. 1:~? exlstin? uses of zhe prcceriv, includin(z the locat,o^ of ail :iructures
af'C :,.e pr=j2^[ uses of 17h2 :ifL.'C:C:r2 - and. c Sia[2r`?erl[ i `:V^ICi'
1
--e io re.Tiai .-.~i.~..r platting _
Supplernental inrormaiion ;nc!udine•
' (a) PrGCosed C2°c' resiric:ions (ii any) _
(b) P. ccr Of Proce-ky ownership
(c) - procc5ed Dian for provisiCn of _ucci`iision irncrove'rnents
~~J =x:?sir Q na' aural ies ure_ inc:ucin^? 'CC' Gutc:ccoIngs we[Iar-C: 3c ar5an areas
Ir ci^~' C,f i~.e :Cr°C_CI ° If aiion C=n riot craC::C=biV :iIc `fn on the
cre!i,m;nar% piei. i
' [ al: be InCCfi.Ofc[cC Ir;io a nai ra[i
`.v af'C ?iiCrnl%2C _
;ti'~ :i•,e aceticaiicn _
J) Solar Access Calculations:
~Y-
K) Oth Information No. of Copies
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
mav :99
1
Ja(~ r~
:_-r {tat .C{ .ter i ' :9.
' SIERRA PACOC
SP DEVELOPMENT, INC.
P.O. Box 1754 LAKE OSWEGO, OR-97035 (503) 684-3175 FAX (503) 684-3176
August 21, 1995
Mr. Harry Jeffery
14520 SW. Fern Street
Tigard, OR. 97223
RE: EASEMENT FOR-DRIVEWAY~AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS/ UTILITIES
Dear Mr. Jeffery;
' This letter shall serve to formalize the discussions we have
been having concerning a driveway access to your home along
• with utility improvements and-an easement for access along a
portion of our property fronting SW. Hillshire Woods Drive.
.Sierra Pacific Development is agreable to.granting Harry Jeffery
and easement for a driveway and providing some construction of
'the access as outlined below as long as the following terms are
agreable to you as evidenced by you signature beloV and returning
this original to us and keeping the extra copy for yourself.
' Sierra Pacific will grant this easement for*the sum of $1,500.00
including the work to be performed as follows: ,
Grading access to SW. Hillshire Woods Drive- (Completed)
Installing sanitary sewer lateral- (Completed)
' Installing driveway drop in curb.
Prepare easement document for recording
Record easement
This letter shall serve as evidence to the City of Tigard of our
agreement to grant this easement. No other construction is to be
provided other than outlined above without prior agreement with
' Sierra Pacific Development. If you have any questions regarding
this easement please do not hesitate to call and we will continue
to work on this item. Thank you.
' S nc y AGREED THIS DAY OF AUGUST,19
e Nets Harry J ffer V I/
t .
' EXHIBIT NO.
Y/} r/ 7`~r S r~(C ~ IZ u>>f-~ sue.,-~- i ~
CE170 JU1J
0 1996
/j1lc 2fl1,~Ra S/ c// Olt
r•i
- - - _ - Ar - - v - - -
sw ~~,~rJ sr,
' ~ ~ ~ +zn L g T ~z3
- MIA=
_.~_v fl-~ -
' ' - ---T_~ R__LZ ? o 7Z2 3
j.
sue- - }~41a-rOj-4ri 17--s is D~N6, 7-OFE-
~V~TiG1~ _L~Jrr/ /N 7"~ -7 C~Ll~ND~4lL D~~S /YIPS! iVt/GH~3~~1~5
3.;
t4v cg,✓Fr~/~~ TiAT ir tufts Pcs r46 D .
f;q E-r,41 P,9 p AYRN D 'P.!«~ I✓
f~ti
- - --Lot,
- -
- i.:. - - t n: 5 (Y r % /Y ~-ill 0 0/ F 0
Y - i;
: vg
t~
ii; _
i!
- -/L~s~c,vsr -~-D- ®JG'.....-NrylNilo~ Co.uc~"DNS CUE f?/ulPeSk..-- -
To P-7 A /Zr siDL'.vcr n.> 7J(p n~crTN ,q
DAJ -rltL S ,,L)rK L, c 7T
- - - - E.. --.~A✓~-~~UIz-~C/~i~r~~T wvsJ~T~],Jrr
s Ll9la r 7/a G 79 N cki F/ C.P PEA
j3aTN srbr,~'~ /+~L N~~~ilpc2S
mr~6rla/C- THr✓l~. ce~~Kra/S ti~Or,Ft~ i,v >/t.~ ~,ETTE~'
A TTAG K _2 o nr -
7-11,e SAMrL
- ° C- RYA,cI Gi3r~ic.v' 4Av-D DE✓~LGpME.~'T"
- J _ cvh~suxrAwrs EXHIBIT NO...~,...,,_
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE
' WITHIN SEVEN (i7 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE SIGN POSTING, RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT TO:
C
i Tigar
13125 SW Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
' I, 144►zU J. JF-FrEfzY , do affirm that I am Jfe j the party initiating
interest in a proposed Z4u> ~7i1,2,ery, c~ affecting the land
located at (state the approximate location(s) if no address(s) and/or tax lot(s) currently
' registered) I-FSZ o s w Fkw~~ g T- I ~ZQrSS' S~ Asc_'K us f oO peg -,and
did on the -7, 1 day of /o A Y ,
19TL. personally post notice indicating that the site may be-proposed for a f-AP-V00Aew6
' coPr), <roN,4L- US E~- application, and the time, date and place of a neighborhood
meeting to discuss the proposal.
' The sign was posted at ,Zo Sc.. r&2A✓ s- lZ9b's Sc-, ~ 1 .
' (state location you posted notice on property)
l `
' Ignature (In the r s n of a Notary Public)
(THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COWLETE/NOTARIZE)
Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the 2_ day of'/,4c/ , 19_.
OFFICIAL SEAL
DANIEL POET
NOTARY PUBLIC OREGON 1
COMMISSION NO.049410 1
t Ff COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 3,1999
NOTARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
My Commission Expires:
' (Applicant, please complete information below for proper placement with proposed project)
NAME E OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED NA~NIE: NdP«4 J V rT J &1=Fri: .
'TYPE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: 1-kvfl G4Arr1r1e1V1ATd _ ~ a~ sr~eN~c ► Da tr.`X
I Vane of Applicant/Owner. • J J v Pi 7-9 • . 'k Fr.O rt
' I - ddress or General Location of Subj ct Properri: l `i S.AC SLJ FERN 5; • 7-1,1Ai-'b /7/2- 97 L z 3
I
i
LSubjecc P.oper-y Ta_c Map(s) and Lac_(s)_-- R /~y TA 11,-o
t n:,loginkpmvr"esW.por..^r,
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
' STATE OF OREGON )
) SS.
' City of Tigard )
I, ffAaaV E . 4)V- F=Fg- Y?Y being duly swom, depose
and say that on Ns V 3 1 19 74 I caused to have mailed to each
' of the persons on the attached list, a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed
development at (or near)
aZ o 5~,1 =FLf'n1 S -
' T/6R2D , y2 97Z z.3
a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof.
' I further state that said notices were enclosed in envelopes plainly addressed to said
persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post
' Office located at Tr C n Jz D nt,~ ~ ti
with postage prepaid thereon.
' Signatu (In threse of a Notary Public)
' (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON, NOTARY PUBLIC TO COWLETEiNOTARIZE)
' Subscribed and swom/amrmed before me on the 3 1 da y of 4119 96
-
OFFICIAL SEAL
DANIEL POET
' i NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON
COMMISSION NO. 049410 NO ARY PUBLIC OF OREGON
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DEC. 3,1999
' My Commission Expires:
' (Aoplicant. ?lease complete information below for proper placement with proposed proje~)
OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED MI E: 94,t sl JVC'irtl Jkr-Gl1 Y
IT1-PE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPSIEN'r: x:n r
' !.Name of ApplicanrlOwner. 11A t' P. X E. ~ JCP 17'N A • J L,C FL= _ I
97Zx 3
Address or General Locacon of Subject Property:J'-JT- -c S eJ LeF-AAA Ci D . eel
' 'subject Property Taz ltao(s) and Lot--(s): -.L I' [o ►3C T/. LOCI
n" ii erst~'rnad.rtst
May 31, 1995
(See Mailing List)
RE: Land Partitioning & Development
Dear Interested Party:
Harry E. and Judith A. Jeffery are proposing to partition Tax
' Lot 1100 of Tax Map 2510-104BC into three parcels. We would
like to discuss this proposal in more detail with the
surrounding property owners and residents. You're invited to
the following meeting:
When: June 13, 1996
Where: Our home with entrance off of new Ascension
' Drive with the address of 12985 SW. It's the
first driveway south of Fern Street(up the hill).
Time : 7:30 PM
' Please note, this will be an informational meeting on
preliminary plans. These plans may be altered prior to
' submittal of application to the City.
I look forward to discussing more specifically the proposed
partitioning and development. Please feel free to call me at
t 524-0437.
Sincerely,
' Harry E. Jeffery
1
r
' Mailing List for Harry Jeffery Project Notification Letter
Pat Wyden, CIT Resident/Land Owners
8122 SW Spruce Street
Tigard, OR 97223 Mr. & Mrs. Bill Bright
14444 SW Fern Street
Craig Hopkins, CIT Tigard, OR 97223
7430 SW Varns Street
Tigard, OR 97223 Mr. & Mrs. David Rieker
14504 SW Fern Street-
Joel Stevens, CIT Tigard, OR 97223
9660 SW-Ventura Court
' Tigard, OR 97223 Bonneville Power Admin.
905 NE 11th
Mark F..Mahan, CIT Portland, OR 9723:),
' 11310 SW 91st Court
Tigard, OR 97223 Portland General Electric
121 SW Salmon
Portland, OR 9720'f
Sierra Pacific Development
' Lake Oswego, OR 97035
Sign-up Sheet
' Harry and Judith Jeffery Project Meeting
of June 13, 1996
' Name Address Phone
1 _
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0 •
' TO: HARRY AND JUDY JEFFERY
' FROM: DAVID AND MAVIS RIEKER
SUBJECT: LAND PARTITIONING
DATE: JUNE 10, 1996
In the proposed partitioning of Tax Lot 1100 of Tax Map 2S 10-104BC, from one
lot into three tax lots, in itself is not a problem. The livability of having a larger lot is
more desirable to us, but creating three lots from one larger lot does not create the
' concern we have with this proposed change.
The concern we have is with the intended use of the two undeveloped lots that
would be split off. If these lots were restricted to single family dwellings on!y, then the
livability of this neighborhood would remain only slightly altered. If these lots are allowed
to have multiple family units built on them, i.e. duplexes, then it is our firm belief that the
' overall value, and livability of this neighborhood would be compromised.
Whenever there are multiple family units intermixed with higher value homes, the
homes seem to suffer on the market. With multiple family dwellings, there is a lack of a
sense of ownership that prevails, and detracts from the single family homes in close
proximity. Along with this lack of ownership, there is quite often a lack of respect for the
' property of others.
It is our firm belief that allowing multiple family units on these lots would damage
the serenity and appeal of the surrounding single family homes. With this in mind we will
have to oppose the proposed partitioning at least as far as multiple family development is
' concerned.
Respect ly,
1
cc.
City of Tigard, Mark Roberts
Bill and Carrie Bright
' THE SUNDAY OR GONIAN, FEBRUARY 27 1994 ADVERTISING St
n0 - ( d
~}OA `•f ' a I_ irl ~(t~l i
- r _ III I~ ~ it •x .~Y•'..•
' .rte w -
D~N/BR
12 4 X 10
OPTIONAL BASEMENT`
sunny, vaulted breakfast nook and
' - vaulted great room create a comfort-
s,T able gathering place in this 1,830-
1 M; R square-foot, three-bedroom home. X t4
' wt C110 HC SrrMr M-T
A covered entry leads to a foyer with a sky-
VAULTED i light and an adjacent den/bedroom with a
23 X 21;e R~: SIN P
za rivate bath. Toward the rear of the house is
X a
o u BAT n c P1 x the great roam, which includes a bar and din-
ing area and opens to a small back patio. The
t I o adjacent kitchen has an island with range,
BR pantry and a nook with bay windows that can
I2/4 X i I e serve as an eating area.
sroR Off a central hallway lies a second bed-
L0 FOYERroom and the master bedroom suite, which
VAULTED` features a walk-in closet and a custom mas-
t Nooh
ter bath with Jacuzzi tub. A utility room leads
' D ~v/BR to a two-car garage.
124 X 10 1,vTlz~~ Address inquiries about Plan No. 71493 to
PLANTER ~ Surltel Design. 7000 S.W. Hampton, Ste. 238,
' Tigard,- Ore. 97223; (503) 624-0555. A seuen-
set construction package is available for $400.
GARAGE FLOOR PLAN Reproducible vellums are $500. A single set
22 X 19/8 stamped "Not for Construction" may be pur-
' 1830 SQUARE FEET chased for $185, which can be
. applied to the price of the seven-
set construction package. A
Material lists are available for B D e
' 4 6' $30. A study sheet of this plan is IBIT NO.'S
available for $25.
\Im~ all Illod m ml, m
40
11 ' 1 1 I I ' / j /
I ✓
op*
co)
ool
10,1 1 ~ Alfi,~~
~rn 11 1. 1 1 ` I I 11 i'
rnx
Cf)
I \ ` ~;1 \ \ 1 rn i
777-7-7- 1
ECK(
1 I ~~0 1 1 1 ~I ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1
I
I l o lI ~ I~\ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 ~I I I
I 1 I ~ I / I I 11~ ` I ~ 1 X 1 1 1 1( I' I 11~
I I 1 1 I 1
NOO.43'00-E 635.50'
i
6 I p.3r435r3 N041Vd151N;r;O- tJa'"~, i 3 14.' .ti•:'.i S3
4
1
N0p•M100t '14W
.9C9 .OC1
or
d -
Ul r P`•1 ! Air
n JJ.fie► 11
o a p~4~'' E,3• ,9`. ~ ~ ~ b eoo-yno++ ~ 111
.0, V Q
3 '9 d
p 1 .c•'•~ I 1 N 3 v,:.3 G 'v -3
Y
G ~p'~7CIOF 225.41 .
•1J OG WC'W '1J Oi 9Y►~4 Y
• .aoz -
♦s OG icvoc
y inooc OL 9E9 M.SS,L1r.00S
11 A
~ P1018N3~d ~
E
HH 1 A u \ ~ • ~ .J
I~• _ i t
-ja
-04
r~ r
_777 cr
500-Q13
BG cT
1
- 3 1
21
1 BC'' 'BG 1500
510500-0140' B
S1 B
2S Q110~ B 5440
5500 ~
2S
00
2S
2'5104 p
1 w_
2S105DP,-0
~
ti
i
96 j
_Q011JgtR
.sot- ficauC
~'icuv~I N
FAX TRANSMITTAL 90
DATE:
TO: Mary White, Legals (fax) 620-3433
FROM: Patricia Lunsford, City of Tigard (Ph.) 639-4171
PLACE TINDER CITY OF TIGARD LOGO
IN THE LEGALS SECTION
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 96-001 I/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0003
➢ JEFFREY PARTITION Q
The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request to partition one (1) 1.81 acre lot into three (3)
lots of 20,003, 28,371 and 30,872. LOCATION: 14520 SW Fern Street (WCTM 2S1 0413C, Tax Lot
1100). ZONE: R-7 (Single-family residential, 5,000 square feet attached per unit). The purpose of the
R-7 zoning district is to establish sites for attached and detached single-family residences.
APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88,
18.92, 18.96, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108, 18.162 and 18.164.
(PLACE VICINITY MAP HERE)
The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be obtained from the Planning Department,
Tigard Civic Center, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on
Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of
the Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may be filed within 10 days after notice is
given and sent. The deadline for filing of an appeal is 3:30 PM
TT PUBLISH DATE:
MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 JEFFREY PARTITION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
CITY OF TIGARD
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
DATE: July 3, 1996
TO: Per Attached
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE:
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 96-001 i/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0003
➢ JEFFREY PARTITION Q
The applicant is requesting approval to partition one (1) 1.81 acre lot into three (3) lots of 20,003, 28,371
and 30,872. LOCATION: 14520 SW Fern Street (WCTM 2S1 0413C, Tax Lot 1100). ZONE: R-7
(Single-family residential, 5,000 square feet attached per unit). The purpose of the R-7 zoning district is
to establish sites for attached and detached single-family residences. APPLICABLE REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.96, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.162 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15, 1996. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
((Pkase chefnllomnginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting:
Phone Number(s):
MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 JEFFREY PARTITION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
R VEST FOR COM MN* LP RG ` 00 l l
s ~ qG-~Q
NOTIFICATION UST FOR LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT TEAMS
(circle one)
CIT Area: W S E C Ill Placed for review in Libra CIT Book
CITY DEPARTMENTS
_ BLDG. DEPT./David Scott, e~+amro omcb t~PO EPT./Kelley Jennings, Gimp Rm rm Oft RATIONS/ w, Mm 1. so-.
_ CITY ADMIN./Cathy Wheatley, at,ft..as LA~. DEPT./Brian Roger, o"-iw_iRe~ewFnpnee, M.DEV. DEPT./D.S.T.'S
ADV. PLNG./Nadine Smith. Fl.n uowie ATER DEPT./Michael Miller, ooa fio wiv.~ooaodornMois-
SPECIAL DISTRICTS'
.SIRE MARSHALL _ NIFIED SEWERAGE AGENCY _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DIST.
Gene Birchell SWM Program/Lee Walker PO Box 745
Wo. County Fire District 155 N. First Street Beaverton, OR 97075
(pick-up box Hillsboro. OR 97124
AFFECTED JURISDICTIONS
WA. CO. DEPT. OF LAND USE & TRANSP. -METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION _ METRO-GREENSPACES
150 N. First Avenue 800 NE Oregon St. # 16. Suite 540 Mel Huie (CPA's/ZOA's)
Hillsboro, OR 97124 Portland, OR 97232-2109 600 NE Grand Avenue
Portland, OR 97232-2736
_ Brent Curtis (CPA's) _ STATE HIGHWAY DIVISION
_ Jim Tice (IGA'S) Sam Hunaidi _ METRO
_ Mike Borreson (Engineer) PO Box 25412 Mary Weber
_ King (CPA's) Portland, OR 97225-0412 600 NE Grand Avenue
Harry (Current Planning App's) Portland, OR 97232-2736
ynn Bailey (Current Planning App's) _ OREGON DLCD (CPA's/ZOA's)
1175 Court Street, N.E. _ ODOT/REGION 1
_ CITY OF BEAVERTON Salem, OR 97310-0590 Laurie Nicholson/Trans. Planning
Larry Conrad, Senior Planner 123 N.W. Flanders
PO Box 4755 _ CITY OF PORTLAND Portland, OR 97209-4037
1120 SW 5th
_ CITY OF BEAVERTON Portland, OR 97204 _ ODOT/REGION 1, DISTRICT 2-A
Mike Matteucci, Neighborhood Coordinator Bob Schmidt/Engineering Coord.
PO Box 4755 _ CITY.OF DURHAM 2131 SW Scholls/PO Box 25412
Beaverton, OR 97076 Planning Director Portland, OR 97225
Beaverton, OR 97076 City Manager
PO Box 23483 _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO
_ CITY OF TUALATIN Tigard. OR 97281-3483 City Manager
PO Box 369 PO Box 369
Tualatin, OR 97062 _ ~f OTHER% Lake Oswego, OR 97034
_ CITY OF KING CITY
City manager
15300 SW 116th
Kin City. OR 97224
SPECIAL AGENCIES
_ GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRIC _ PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _ COLUMBIA CABLE CO.
Elaine Self, Engineering Brion Moore Craig Eyestone
PO Box 23416 14655 SW Old Scholls Ferry Rd. 14200 SW Brigodoon Court
Tigard, OR 97281-3416 Beaverton, OR 97007 Beaverton, OR 97005
_ NW NATURAL GAS CO. R,o„« (503)721-244+ -METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _ TRI-MET TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT
Scott Palmer Fox (503) 721.2502 Jason Hewitt Kim Knox, Project Planner
220 NW Second Avenue Twin Oaks Technology Center 710 ONE Holladay Street
Portland. OR 97209-3991 1815 NW 169th Place S-6020 Portland. OR 97232
Beaverton, OR 97006-4886
_ TCI CABLEVISION OF OREGON _ US WEST COMMUNICATIONS -SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO.
Linda Peterson Pete Nelson Clifford C. Cobe. Const. Engineer
3500 SW Bond Street 421 SW Oak Street 5424 SE McLoughlin
Portland, OR 97201 Portland, OR 97204 Portland, OR 97202
STATE AGENCIES FEDERAL AGENCIES
-AERONAUTICS DIVISION (ODOT) _ DIVISION OF STATE LANDS _ US POSTAL SERVICE
-COMMERCE DEPT.-M.H. PARK _ FISH & WILDLIFE Randy Hammock. Growth Cord.
_ PUC _ DOGAMI Cedar Mill Station
_ DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY _ U.S. ARMY CORPS. OF ENGINEERS Portlcnd, OR 97229-9998
-OTHER rc~npi spot y~mesimVlcroac. rrs1
Route To:
Surveyor
Development Review Engineer
FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plat Name: Case Number(s) Pt-,P Address: 2`l P,S tv- .
(Do NOT release addresses to the public without
consent of the Engineering Department.)
Contact name and phone
(Fill in when plat is dropped off)
DATE RECEIVED: I I LL., I'&
DATE FORWARDED TO SURVEY: zl Z-~4Pj
SURVEY SECTION Check if Check if
Considered Okay
1. Street alignment and width, continuity ❑ N ❑
❑
2. Curve, corner, cul-de-sac radii ❑ IV A
3. Dedication, vacation, easement conveyance ED' ❑
4. Residential Survey Certificate match the map [t,
Comments: I
/V D Co aJ J ¢ ~/e~.
Surveyor's Signature Date
Page 1 of 1
I1QJGN V-0EVTD&P AT WT
Route To:
1. Planning
2. Building
3. Engineering Tech I
4. Development Review Engineer
FINAL PLAT REVIEW CHECKLIST
Plat Name: PAQ:- - Case Number(s)
DATE RECEIVED: t 12's I q?-~
DATE FORWARDED TO PLANNING: Z- zz I~(teo
To: Wo
Planning Division Check if Check if
Considered Okay
1. Phase boundaries bi q Ul/' El
2. Lot and/or tract size and configuration ❑
3. Lot numbers ❑
4. Access restrictions, reserve strips Eq~ 11
5. Condition of Approval Satisfied /Q
11
6. Public griva streets (location, width, etc....,) 0
7. Preliminary Plat approval date - 1 yr period OK El
8. Special Deed Restrictions (C.C.&R's) ~'b1A El
9. Open Space (Deed or Dedication) El
10. SPECIAL SETBACKS ARE
CQ~~.N4~S WQ.1/'~ 5 ~O W N 1~ ~1d I~¢1.1~ ~V ~(GY U.4Qf ~rQ ~'L 'O~ ~✓~l0 t N Y'[OS C QI/QQ~.
11. Assign Case Number (above)
Other Comments:
3 9~
By:
Pl a 's Signature Date
FORWARDED TO BUILDING DIVISION: 3
Date
Page I of 4
I+ENQM V.DE VT1N'-PLAT. DOT
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: /
~,e,el 1TloYJn fl w 1 v ~u 1 a 2 3 Q r of ~'w J o a+, t.+ t a~</ rr i i es
Q 1 9t d %e Y. ~ 4,,,c e
0/vui~l Gc frHC/~' ft„rr, ~t~~N~d~ ~~ra~,,l ta~/ ~ •~t3 f'<c ~~r.~
t/ eC; X cAA vn f
/ Hyc% 4-1_t_ " S-o d
rc- A,o Ae e-4-
By: ~i 21 Z lqll?
Building Dept. Signature Date
FORWARD TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Attn.: Engineering Tech/Engineering Records) • 3 n 4 an
Date
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (Engineering Tech) Check if
Okay
Street Names Acceptable
Manhole Numbers ❑
Assign Address(s) - (front page)
Update City-wide maps
Comments:
By:'~11_~1''~~
Engineering Tech's Signature Date
FORWARDED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ENGINEER
Date
Page 2 of 4
I.1ENQYWZEV TD4-FIATDM
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Check if
Okay
Public Improvement Plans Approvable/Approved ❑
Public Improvement Fees/Deposits ❑
Right-of Entry, Release & Waivers, Easement ❑
(onsite - offsite)
Public Improvement Agreement ❑
Public Improvement Assurance ❑
Conditions of Approval Satisfied? ❑
Sewer Availability Letter Prepared ❑
Joint Access, Non-Remonstrance Agreement ❑
Comments:
By:
Development Review Engineer's Signature Date
Page 3 of 4
1.AENG PR1 -DE TM-PLATAOT
Returned to Surveyor for Correction BY:
DATE:
40
Corrections Reviewed and Approved BY:
DATE: 1 Ck
Forwarded for City Signatures BY:~
C C.A.f. ✓c., ~n DATE:
Copy of Signed Plat Made and Put in File B
TE: 1 2~
Released to Developer for Recording BY:
DATE:
Authorize Eng. Tech I to release addresses BY:
Date:
Copy of Signed Plat to DST's BY:
Date:
Page 4 of 4
I?tNGMV4)EVRN-PLAT WT
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Date March 13, 1998
Number of pages including cover sheet 5
To: Robert Johnson (639-7919) From: Brian Rager
Co: Co: City of Tigard
Fax 624-3746 Fax 684-7297
Ph 639-4171, Ext. 318
SUBJECT: Henry Jeffery Partition Plat (MLP 96-0011)
MESSAGE:
See the attached comments.
1:%ENGTAXDOT
!ROADWAY LL-
LOT 31 fD 13 I 0° 1 EASEMENT AND O
ca I^ I z j MAINTENANCE N
V) !n i I AGREEMENT ;fO N'
W N to I M I N "D8" 'po N. Q
I- 4 - I• I :co N to m
r~ co
0 co j N N~
N w' IJ JI J1 ' co d '
W 00 I I D8"20.00' L i _N I
to to
Y I I I :to A N N '
w I DOCUMENT NO. 900 374 o r,
~ ~ 3 I I I aw I
U (o too I I z
~n I I Cp v z
LLJ
Lr) N ~o ;Z ~o HANDY A E (rsrrL ~lu
-1 00 "1)4"15.0
J N I I ` 3 0p (I)
N 00 i HELD
PERPETUAL EASEMENT "D4" PERPETUAL EAS ENT "D4"
DOCUMENT NO. 84042203 DOCUMENT NO. 8 042203 HELD N N
N-S
1 = - --;-~L21 - L) 00 ~0 i
1 I I S89,38 '34"W, 249.55', ~6j(250.01' 1(D
N I
I I - 79.89' L22 ` 47.35' - 44.92' _
- - --(T)HELD L17 ; 55.08' 9 47' i
PGE EASEMENT, LOT 40.00' PRIVATE AC S 40.00' i
16 "HANDY ACRES" ; EASEMENT PER PLAT
I I EXCEPT THE WEST '~r~ OF "HILLSHIRE WOODS" _
1 100.00', "D3" PARCEL 2
IN co
TRACT "E" BOOK 483, PAGE o; 28,795 SQ FT 0) " I
3,32 (1963) ' '
DOCUMENT NO. 89057728 N
BONNEVILLE POWER i7 ca CIO 0) nt I
ADMINISTRATION BOOK 198 to z . . 'a to
PAGE 394 (1941) O~ ~`c~j~~,_ L6 rn CD
100.00' N89'37 "E, L5 10.001+ 180.00' 3 PARCEL 1 W ^ ci C8 C9
28. I I 10,00' 18,823 SQ FT 0D N
WIDE 1~1 ' 8.00' WIDE PRIVATE oM °o n '
SEWER i i N JI WATER LINE 0 z o° I
,PRFVPFPE EASEMENT SEE v~ I ; EASEMENT SEE N z '
NOTE 1 (SHEET 2) t i NOTE 2 (SHEET 2) 1
-I TAIJ
EODETIC CONTRO J10;, PARCEL 3 0 1
MONUMENT, STATIO 1001 33,860 SQ FT
DESIGNATION GC_O 122 i i 1 1 ;HELD 1
i i ic4i ,E-W 1
129.73', {2](129.84') IJi (P~ 169.49', 121(169.47') 1' 1 HELD
N89'36'41 "E, 1_00.02' (R) ~L8 205.07I ' 1 (0) 94.15'
HELD(S) j2jTN89'35'58"E, 100.01'5 - 59.24 - 45.54 - 32.13 43.22' (N) 83.25' (M)
124.96' 4.76' o
f LOT 25 (Q) N89'36'41 "E, 299.22' °i
121(N89.35'58"E, 299.31') °
T!" • /T " A " I 1 n T I T /'1 T/1 • T
33080849
94025171 (G) FOUND IRON REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP INS ED "ALPHA ENG., INC." IN MONUMENT BOX,
96045842 SURVEYED PICH MARK IN CAP, HELD FOR CENTERLINE R/W AND BASIS OF BEARING.
97077758 (H) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "SCHELSKY L.S. 1841", 0.1' BELO
SET IN €61, LOCATED S89'22'48", 0.27. OF R/W, HELD N-S.
FENCES SURVEYED PUNCH MARK BIN ALUMINUM UCAP. HELD FOR CENTERLINE OF R/W AND BASIS OF BEARING.
~NUY ACRES" (1945) (J) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC." IN MONUMENT BOX,
LLSHIRE WOODS (1995) THE PUNCH MARK IN ALUMINUM CAP IS LOCATED N47'08'25"E, 0.3' OF THE CENTERLINE OF R/W AND
LLSHIRE CREEK CURVATURE.
(K) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG.,' INC.", 0.1' ABOVE
LLSHIRE HOLLOW" SET IN 121, LOCATED N48'08'25"E, 0.29' OF R/W AND POINT OF CURVATURE.
(L) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR 1.2' BELOW GROUND, SET IN €6I, LOCATED N89'38'34"E, 0.77' OF R/W,
N (M) FOUND 1/2- IRON PIPE FLUSH, SET IN1 HELD
(N) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC. 0.2' ABOVE
SET IN 141, LOCATED N00'23'19"W, 0.20' OF THE WESTERLY NORTH LINE OF LOT 37 £21.
W +E (0) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC.% 0.1' ABOVE
SET IN 141, LOCATED N00'23'19"W, 0.10' OF THE WESTERLY NORTH LINE OF LOT 37 121.
S (P) FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE 1.3' BELOW GROUND, SET IN €1}, LOCATED N00'34'18"E, 0.22' OF THE WEE
SCALE NORTH LINE OF LOT 37 121, HELD E-W.
1 "=50"
(Q) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC.", FLUSH, SET
0' 0' 50' (R) FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE 0.9' BELOW GROUND, SET IN (1), LOCATED S84'14'38"W, 0.33' OF SW COR
(S) FOUND 3-1/4" ALUMINUM DISK INSCRIBED "1/4 CORNER COMMON TO SECTION 4 AND 5, T2S, R1'
WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR", 1.0' BELOW GROUND, SEE USBT BOOK 7, PAGE 543. THIS IS ALSC
CONTROL MONUMENT STATION DESIGNATION GC_022_122, PER SN GC22, HELD.
END (T) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR 0.4' BELOW GROUND, SET IN f6I, HELD.
FOR REVIEW PURPOSE:
OF FOUND MONUMENTS ONLY - NOT FOR DISTRIBt
)UND AS SHOWN I CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
.T, 5/8"X30" REBAR WITH EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PAF
FIC CAP MARKED RAJ LS 2725 NOTE REGISTERED
U R EM EN T PROFESSIONAL
SEE SHEET 2 FOR LAND SURVEYOR
REFERENCE
SURVEY MEASUREMENT EASEM7K LINE LABELS
AND NOTE
:ER, WCSR OREGON JULY 25, 1995
~OUNTY SURVEY RECD = ROBERT ALAN JOHNSO
'OUNTY DEED RECD S ST,"_ ►~~S -c #2725
JCE, WCDR ' • EXPIRES 6/30/9
DEED MEASUREM T ~~-~G►~IaN~~'~1c~ ROBER ALAN JOHNSON, PLS
Y LINE 11500 GREENBURG RD-
IATION 2 ~CZq <<S TIGARD, OREGON 97223 (503) E
E DESIGNATION SHEET
APPROVALS PARTITION PL
APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF . 1998 RECORDED AS - D O CU M E
FILE NAME: JEFFERY PARTITION LAND PARTITION FOR HARRY
MINOR LAND PARTITION: MLP 96-0011
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW: SLR .96-0003 A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF LOT
BY: LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 AND NW 1
• CITY OF TIGARD, ENGINEER CITY OF TIGARD, WASHING
T DECEMBER
0T
APPROVED THIS DAY OF 1998
WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR,
BY:
DECLAR
ALL TAXES, FEES, ASSESSMENTS, u ~ERY, THE FEE OWNERS OF THE LANC
)AACHED ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS
OR OTHER CHARGES AS PROVIDED AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBE
Q~ E THAT THEY CAUSED SAID LAND Tc
BY O.R.S. 92.095 HAVE BEEN PAID PARCELS AND EASEMENTS IN ACCO
AS OF 1998 TER NO. 92 OF THE OREGON REVISI
MAP.
DIRECTOR,
DIVISION OF ASSESSMENT & TAXATION,
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON HARRY E. -JEFFERY
BY
DEPUTY
STATE OF OREGON A C K N O Y Y L)
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ~ SS
STATF OF
.tQ$'4~,rvsuv 1J ~u) ANU (T). THE SOUTHERLY
NORTH BOUNDARY LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY HELD FOUND MONUMENTS (L) HELD BY
N-S AND (T). THE EASTERLY EAST BOUNDARY LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY HELD
FOUND MONUMENTS (F) AND (M). THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE IS ESTABLISHED
BY HELD FOUND MONUMENTS (M) AND (S). THE PROPERTY CORNERS ARE
ESTABLISHED BY THE INTERSECTIONS OF THE BOUNDARY LINES DESCRIBED ST,
ABOVE AND AS DEPICTED ON THE ATTACHED MAP.
CO
I D
CEf
PL/
s LINE TABLE FOR EASEMENTS AN[
199
LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE COL
Lt S89'27'53"W 10.00' L19 N89'27'53"E 15.00'
L2 S89'27'53"W 10.00' L20 S00'33'58"W 420.78'
L3 S0033'58"W 494.83' L21 S89'38'34"W 234.61' BY_
• L4 N89'37'38 E 63.91' L22 N89'38'34"E 27.84'
L5 N89'37 38"E 64.07' L23 N44'26'05"W 112.97'
L6 N8937'38"E 64.24' L24 N00'33'55"E 143.52
L7 S00'33'58"W 495.21' L25 N45'32'23'E 59.39'
L8 S89'36 41 W 10.66' L26 N00'32'23"E 170.00'
L9 N1 9'51'44"E 106.41' L27 N89'27'53"E 8.00'
L10 N89'37'38"E 10.66' L28 N89'27'53"E 12.00'
L11 S1 9'51'44"W 106.41' L29 S00'32'23"W 225.89'
` i L12 N89'36'41 'E 8.00' L30 S89'36'35"W 12.00' I Cf
L13 N00'29'28"E 99.84' L31 N89'27'37"W 8.00' EXAC
L14 N89'37'38"E 8.00' L32 N00'32'23"E 27.43'
L15 N00'29'28"E 99.84' L33 S4532'23"W 31.11'
L16 S00'21'26"E 15.00' L34 S00'33'55"W 126.95'
' L17 S8938'34"W 249.86' L35 S44'26'05"E 124.05'
L18 N00'33'58'E 435.74'
t N OTES,
lS.oo DE ER EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 2
1
2. 8.00' WIDE WATER LINE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 2 ACC
3. 20.00' WIDE JOINT ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCELS 2 CURVE RADIUS
AND 3• THE OWNERS OR OWNER OF PARCELS -2 AND 3 SHALL JOINTLY C10 50.00'
AND EQUALLY MAINTAIN ANY AND ALL IMPROVEMENTS MADE ON SAID Cil 40.00'
EASEMENT. C12 30.00' ^
,04%13/98 11:11 $503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD [it 001
ACTIVITY REPORT s~c3
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX NO. 0411
CONNECTION TEL 503 624 3746
CONNECTION ID KINKOS-TIGARD
START TIME 03/13 11:08
USAGE TIME 02'30
PAGES 5
RESULT OK
FAX TRANSMITTAL
A4.6
Date March 13, 1998
Number of pages including cover sheet 5
C7 12
To: Robert Johnson (639-7919) _ From: Brian Ra er ~TT
Co: Co: City of Tigard
Fax 624-3746 Fax 684-7297
Ph 639-4171 Ext. 318
SUBJECT: Henry Jeffery Partition Plat (MLP 960011)
MESSAGE:
See the attached comments.
CITY OF TIGARD
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
DATE: July 3. 1996
TO: Michael Miller. Operations Water Dept. Manager
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE:
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 96-0011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0003
➢ JEFFREY PARTITION Q
The applicant is requesting approval to partition one (1) 1.81 acre lot into three (3) lots of 20,003, 28,371
and 30,872. LOCATION: 14520 SW Fern Street (WCTM 2S1 0413C, Tax Lot 1100). ZONE: R-7
(Single-family residential, 5,000 square feet attached per unit). The purpose of the R-7 zoning district is
to establish sites for attached and detached single-family residences. APPLICABLE REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.96, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.162 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15, 1996. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
A-A°It.lcA+T tS To 'Cooxotmeaa nny4_ watit{ _ (!E. &-tw w N" wn PaaasEo
8- jwScjt WaEt_ MAW 6w, o ILAALI " abuzw") To k4aio eWA'UcaT 41/ QrYfi
/C;E~Il7L~~IC~b W I T4i>S A- MI N I A4L401 /s• p ~ 3f.AdE^1T~
(rn&oe thefo,,Tomnginformation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Ali k,9 t
Phone Number(s):
MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 JEFFREY PARTITION PROPOSAL/REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal
Notice TT 8 5 9 0
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising t C E i V E D
• ❑ Tearsheet Noticet~~ 199
*City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd. OF TiGAk~
OTigard,Oregon 97223-8199 13 Duplicate Affida, ifitr
*Accounts Payable • MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 96-0011/
SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0003
> JEFFREY PARTITION <
The Director has approved, subject to conditions, a request for Minor
Land Partition approval to partition a 1.81-acre lot into three (3) lots of
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 20,003, 28,371 and 30,872. The applicant has also requested Sensitive
Lands Review to develop on a portion of the property with slopes in
excess of 25%. LOCATION: 14520 S.W. Fern Street WCTM 2S I
STATE OF OREGON, ass 04BC, Tax Lot 1100). ZONE: R=7 (Single-family residential, 5,000
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ) square feet attached per unit). The purpose of the R-7 zoning district is to ,
I Kathy Snyder establish sites for attached and detached single-family residences.
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code
Director, or his principal clerk, of thdt'? rc3-Tina 1 at i n mimes Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.96, 18.102, 18.106, 18.108,
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 18.162 and 18.164.
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
aforesaid count and state; that the i
MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for ONF successive and
consecutive in the following issues:`
August 1,1996
I
i
Subscribed and sworn before me thislst day of August,: Nota ublic for Oregon
SUB" T
My Commission Expires: -
AFFIDAVIT -NBC V
The adopted finding of facts, decision, and statement of conditions can be
obtained from the Planning Department, Tigard Civic Center, 13125 S.W.
Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. The decision shall be final on August
14, 1996. Any party to the decision may appeal this decision in
accordance with Section 18.32.290(A) and Section 18.32.370 of the
Community Development Code, which provides that a written appeal may
be filed within 10 days after notice is given and sent. The deadline for
filing an appeal is 3:30 P.M., August 14. 1996.
TT8590 - Publish August 1, 1996.
COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Legal
P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 Notice TT 8 5 9 0
BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075
Legal Notice Advertising 4 6 L E i V E U
OCity of Tigard • ❑ Tearsheet N
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
*Tigard,Oregon 97223-8199 • ❑ Duplicai 966
SAccounts Payable • 103
4aee ,
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION`
STATE OF OREGON, )
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, )ss.
1, Kathy Snyder
being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising
Director, or his principal clerk, of thelLigarr3-m„a3 atin mimes
a newspaper of general circulation as defined in ORS 193.010
and 193.020; published at Tigard in the
aforesaid county and state; that the
MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the
entire issue of said newspaper for ONE successive and
consecutive in the following issues:
August 1,1996
I
CO(-kAj 4~~ AJ ;i 6nw Joaad
Subscribed and sworn before me thislst day of August,1996
OFFICIAL SEAL
ROBI + A. f3tfl?SaESS
Nota ublic for Oregon NOTAc '1-IC - OREGON
' COWN" 40. 024552
My Commission Expires: -my r •6=1 i Eh :RES MAY 16,199'
AFFIDAVIT
~~ENT OF
Department of Energy
Bonneville Power Administration
P.O. Box 3621
~gTESOF Portland, Oregon 97208-3621
AUG 12 ~G
TTRC
Tract No. VE-118 (FEE)
Your reference:
Jeffrey Partition, It LP 96-0011, SLR 96-0003
Planning Division
Tigard City Hall
13125 SW. Hall Boulevard
Tigard, OR 97223
Reference is made to your notice of proposed partition. Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)
has no objection to this proposed partition, as long as our transmission line facilities will not be
adversely affected.
Note that BPA imposes certain restrictions and/or prohibitions on the use of its fee-owned
transmission line right-of-way. Applications must be submitted to BPA for ANY use proposed
within the right-of-way. You may call me at 1-800-836-6619, toll free, or directly at
(503) 230-3291 for information on this application process.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal.
Sincerely,
Julie K. Rose
Realty Specialist, Real Property Management
cc: (w/Landowner booklet)
Mr. Ryan O'Brien Mr. and Mrs. Harry Jeffrey
Land Development Consultants 14520 SW. Fern Street
233 SE. Washington Street Tigard, OR 97223
Hillsboro, OR 97213
i •
RECEIVED PLANNING
FF Portland General Ele~ic Corrpany
C C C A U G ®8 1996
August 7, 1996
Mark Roberts, AICP
Associate Planner
City of Tigard Planning Division
City Hall
13125 SW Hall Blvd
Tigard OR 97223
Re Jeffrey Partition, MLP96-0011
SLR96-0003
Dear Mark Roberts:
I noticed on the documents connected to the Notice of Decision which was sent to Portland
General Electric on August 2, 1996 concerning the above minor partition that the site plan
exhibit map shows Portland General Electric's easement to be 100 feet wide. For your
information, the easement through the entire length of this strip is 125 feet wide and parallels
the Bonneville Power Administration easement of 100 feet wide. It would appear, from
examining the site plan, that this would cause a reallocation of the space where the single party
and duplexes will be located as buildings and structures of this type are not allowed within the
PGE easement.
Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at 464-8120.
Very truly yours,
x4 lz-~
Dave Larsen
Property Services
IPS2-8114
c: Harry and Judith Jeffrey
121 S.W. Salmon Street, Portland, Oregon 97204
~b~
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
DATE: August 1, 1996
TO: Mark Roberts, Planning Division
FROM: Brian Rager, Development Review Engineerv_--
RE: MLP 96-0011/SLR 96-0003 Jeffery Partition
Description:
The applicant requests partition approval to divide a 1.81 acre lot into 3 lots of
20,003 square feet (sf), 28,371 sf and 30,872 sf. The site is located at 14520
SW Fern Street (WCTM 2S1 0413C, Tax Lot 1100).
Findings:
1. Streets:
This site lies adjacent to SW Fern Street, and backs up to SW Ascension
Drive. Fern Street is classified as a local residential street and is being
improved as a part of adjacent development in the area. There is 50 feet
of right-of-way (ROW) currently, which meets the City standard for that
type of street. Therefore, no additional dedications are required. This site
only has approximately 50 feet of frontage on Fern Street and the addition
of the two proposed lots will not result in a significant traffic impact on the
street. Therefore, it does not seem practical to require the applicant to
provide a half-street improvement on Fern Street at this time. Staff
recommends that the applicant be required to enter into a non-
remonstrance agreement with the City that will obligate them to participate
in the future improvements of Fern Street adjacent to their site. This
agreement should be executed prior to approval of the final partition plat.
SW Ascension Drive is fully improved and provides access to the existing
house on this site (shown to be located on Parcel 1 of the proposed
partition). The topography of this site is such that Parcel 1 sits 30 feet
higher than Parcels 2 and 3. Therefore, it seems practical that Parcel 1
should continue to have access onto SW Ascension Drive. Parcels 2 and
3 will have access out to Fern Street. The applicant has stated that they
may obtain an access easement from the property owner to the south for
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition PAGE 1
i
Parcel 3. The property to the south is currently under a subdivision review
for a project called Hillshire Hollow.
2. Sanitary Sewer:
There is an 8-inch public sanitary sewer line in SW Fern Street that can
serve this site. At present the line terminates at the intersection of
Ascension Drive. If service is to be obtained from this line, the applicant
must extend the main line westward in Fern Street to this site. They must
also extend the line to the west boundary of this site to allow for future
extension and service to adjacent parcels.
The applicant also proposes an alternate route for sewer service through
the site to the south (proposed Hillshire Hollow subdivision). Since the
Hillshire Hollow project has not been approved, Staff can not recommend
approval of the applicant's proposal. Staff is also concerned about the
proposed route of the public sewer line that would have to be extended
from the Hillshire Hollow site. The applicant's plans show the line
extending through a proposed water quality facility in the Hillshire Hollow
project. Any public sewer line must be located outside of any storm water
detention or treatment facility and must be accessible to City maintenance
vehicles. In order for the applicant's proposal to be approved, the Hillshire
Hollow project must be built and approved prior to this partition taking
place (prior to recording of the final plat). Certainly, before the applicant is
allowed to connect to any sewer extension from the Hillshire project, the
City must inspect and approve the Hillshire sewer line.
In summary, either of the above options for sewer service could be
acceptable to the City. However, if the applicant chooses to be served
through the Hillshire project, timing of the Hillshire improvements will be a
factor.
3. Water:
The applicant is proposing to extend a public water line from the proposed
Hillshire Hollow development. Since that project is not approved or built
yet, Staff does not know if the option is valid. The applicant should be
required to coordinate with the Water Department (Mike Miller) regarding
water service for this development. Any public water line extensions shall
be included in the public improvement plans for this project and must be
approved by the City's Water Department.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition PAGE 2
4. Storm Drainage:
Storm water from this site will flow to the west toward an existing creek.
The applicant is proposing to collect the storm water from the new lots in a
pipe adjacent to the west boundary and treat it in a swale prior to
discharging into the creek. In order to get to the creek, a pipe will need to
cross over property subject to a Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)
easement. The applicant will be required to obtain an off-site easement
granting permission to place the pipe. This easement must be obtained
prior to approval of the final plat.
5. Storm Water Quality:
The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM)
regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA)
(Resolution and Order No. 91-47, as amended by R&O 91-75) which
require the construction of on-site water quality facilities. The facilities
shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in
100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from newly created
impervious surfaces. In addition, a maintenance plan is required to be
submitted indicating the frequency and method to be used in keeping the
facility maintained through the year. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
the applicant shall submit plans and calculations for a water quality facility
that will meet the intent of R&O 91-47. In addition, the applicant shall
submit a maintenance plan for the facility that must be reviewed and
approved by the City prior to issuance of the building permit.
The applicant is proposing to construct a water quality swale to treat storm
water from the private driveway and the new lots. Staff believes that a
swale may be impractical on such a small development, but will make that
determination upon formal review of the design plan for the swale. If Staff
determines that the swale option is impractical, the applicant will have the
option of paying a fee in-lieu of constructing the facility.
6. Grading and Erosion Control:
USA R&O 91-47 also regulates erosion control to reduce the amount of
sediment and other pollutants reaching the public storm and surface water
system resulting from development, construction, grading, excavating,
clearing, and any other activity which accelerates erosion. Per R&O 91-
47, the applicant is required to submit an erosion control plan for City
review and approval prior to issuance of City permits.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition PAGE 3
Recommendations:
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PARTITION PLAT:
Note: Unless otherwise noted, the staff contact for the following conditions will
be Brian Rager, Engineering Department (639-4171).
1. Prior to approval of the final plat, a public improvement permit and
compliance agreement is required for this project. Five (5) sets of detailed
public improvement plans and profile construction drawings shall be
submitted for preliminary review to the Engineering Department. Once
redline comments are addressed and the plans are revised, the design
engineer shall then submit eight (8) sets of revised drawings and one (1)
itemized construction cost estimate for final review and approval (NOTE:
these plans are in addition to any drawings required by the Building Division
and should only include sheets relevant to public improvements. Public
improvement plans shall conform to City of Tigard Public Improvement
Design Standards, which are available at City Hall.
2. Prior to approval of the final plat, any necessary off-site utility easements
shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain and shall be submitted
to and accepted by the City.
3. Prior to approval of the final plat, an agreement shall be executed by the
applicant, on forms provided by the City, which waives the property owner's
right to oppose or remonstrate against a future Local Improvement District
formed to improve SW Fern Street.
4. The final plat shall indicate that the driveway access onto Fern Street will be
jointly used and maintained by both Parcels 2 and 3. A joint access
easement shall be shown on the plat.
5. Sanitary sewer and storm drainage details shall be provided as part of the
public improvement plans. Calculations and a topographic map of the
storm drainage basin and sanitary sewer service area shall be provided as
a supplement to the public improvement plans. Calculations shall be based
on full development of the serviceable area. The location and capacity of
existing, proposed, and future lines shall be addressed.
6. If the applicant chooses to gain sewer access through the property to the
south (proposed Hillshire Hollow subdivision), they shall wait until the sewer
line in that project is complete and accepted by the City. If the Fern Street
sewer is utilized, the applicant shall extend the main line in Fern Street to
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition PAGE 4
the west boundary of this site. The public improvement drawings must
indicate which sewer option will be used.
7. The applicant shall provide sanitary sewer laterals to the adjacent
undeveloped properties.
8. Any extension of public water lines to serve this property shall be included
in the public improvement drawings and shall be reviewed and approved by
the Water Department.
9. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant shall determine if they can
provide an on-site water quality facility as proposed on the preliminary plat,
and as required by Unified Sewerage Agency Resolution and Order No. 91-
47. Final plans and calculations shall be submitted to the Engineering
Department (Brian Rager) for review and approval. In addition, a proposed
maintenance plan shall be submitted along with the plans and calculations
for review and approval. If the Engineering Department determines that a
water quality facility is impractical for this site, the fee in-lieu option will be
offered.
10. An erosion control plan shall be provided as part of the public improvement
drawings. The plan shall conform to "Erosion Prevention and Sediment
Control Plans - Technical Guidance Handbook, February 1994.
11. Final Plat Application Submission Requirements:
A. Three mylar copies of the partition plat prepared by a land surveyor
licensed to practice in Oregon, and necessary data or narrative.
B. The partition plat and data or narrative shall be drawn to the
minimum standards set forth by the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS 92.05),
Washington County, and by the City of Tigard.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide the
Engineering Department with a recorded mylar copy of the partition plat.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition PAGE 5
.
IN ADDITION, THE APPLICANT SHOULD BEAWARE OF THE FOLLOWING
SECTIONS.OF.THECOMMUNI TY
DEVELOPMENT CODE;
THIS IS.NOT;AN EXCLUSIUE,LIST...:,:::
SECTION 18.160.170 Improvement Agreement
1. Before approved construction plans are issued by the City, the Applicant
(subdivider) shall:
A. Execute and file an agreement with the City Engineer specifying the
period within which all required improvements and repairs shall be
completed; and
B. Include in the agreement provisions that if such work is not
completed within the period specified, the City may complete the
work and recover the full cost and expenses from the applicant.
2. The agreement shall stipulate improvement fees and deposits as may be
required to be paid and may also provide for the construction of the
improvements in stages and for the extension of time under specific
conditions therein stated in the contract.
SECTION 18.120.060 BONDING AND ASSURANCES
1. On all projects where public improvements are required the Director shall:
A. Require a bond in an amount not greater than 100 percent of other
adequate assurances as a condition of approval of the site
development plan in order to ensure the completed project is in
conformance with the approved plan; and
B. Approve and release such bonds.
2. The bond shall be released when the Director finds the completed project
conforms to the approved site development plan and all conditions of
approval are satisfied.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition PAGE 6
SECTION 18.164 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS.
Section 18.164.180 Notice to City Required
Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. If work is
discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified.
APPROVED: -
f-- Greg Berry, Acting ity Engineer
heng\brianr\m1p96-11.bdr
ENGINEERING COMMENTS MLP 96-0011 Jeffrey Partition PAGE 7
. ~r `nn V
TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE
FIRE PREVENTION
4755 S.W. Griffith Drive . P.O. Box 4755 . Beaverton, OR 97076 . (503) 526-2469. FAX 526-2538
WC 0 CC ❑ MC O BV ~Tl ❑ TU 0 DU ❑ SH ❑ WI p KC
Jurisdiction File Number. Date
Project Nay e 1lei ( f'2'~ V Project Address: 14 ,v y^
TVF&R File Number. L - c:~LC? (Whenever referring to this project please include the NF&R File Number)
Project approved
Project not approved - Please address items checked below and re-submit plans for review and approval to the:
TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office
O Planning Department having jurisdiction for routing to the TVF&R Fire Marshal's Office
Project conditionally approved subject to correction of items checked below.
1) FIRE. APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD DISTANCE FROM BUii•DING AND TURNAROUNDS: Access roads shall be
within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the building. An approved turnaround is required if the remaining distance to an approved intersecting roadway, as
measured along the fine apparatus access road, is greater than ISO feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2. 1)
2) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD EXCEPTION FOR AUTOMATIC SPRLMMER PROTECTION• When buildings
are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, the requirements for fire apparatus access may be
modified as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 902.2.1 Exception 1)
3) ADDITIONAL. ACCESS ROADS: Where there are 20 or more dwellings, an approved second fire apparatus access roadway
must be provided to a city/county roadway or access easement. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2)
4} FIRE. APPARATUS ACCESS BO AD WIDTH AND VERTICAL CLEARANCE: Fire apparatus access roads shall have an
unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (15 feet for not more than two dwelling units), and an unobstructed vertical clearance
of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. (UFC Sec. 90222.1)
5) SURFACE AND LOAD CAPACITIES: Fire apparatus access roads shall be of an all-weather surface that is easily
distinguishable from the surrounding area and is capable of supporting not less than 12,500 pounds point load (wheel load) and
50,000 pounds live load (gross vehicle weight). (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.2)
Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the design will be capable of supporting such loading.
Please provide documentation from a registered engineer that the finished construction is in accordance with the
approved plans or the requirements of the Fire Code.
6) TURNING RADIUS: The inside turning radius and outside turning radius shall not be less than 25 feet and 45 feet
respectfully, as measured from the same center point. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.3)
7) DEAD END: Dead end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved
turnaround. Diagrams of approved turnarounds are available from the fire district. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.4)
8) BRIDGES: Bridges shall be designed, inspected and final construction approved by a registered engineer. The bridge shall be
designed in accordance with the American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials "Standard Specifications for
Highway Bridges. " The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry 50,000 pounds. (UFC Sec. 902.22.5)
9) AD : Fire apparatus access roadway grades shall not exceed an average grade of 10 percent with a maximum grade of 15
percent for lengths of no more than 200 feet. (UFC Sec. 902.2.2.6). Intersections and turnarounds shall be level (maximum 51/6)
with the exception of crowning for water run-oft.
X10) NO PARKING SIGNS: Where fire apparatus access roadways are not of sufficient width to accommodate parked vehicles,
"No Parking" signs shall be installed on one or both sides of the roadway and in turnarounds as needed. (UFC Sec. 902.2.4)
Signs shall read "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE - TOW AWAY ZONE, ORS 98.810" and shall be installed with a clear space
above ground level of 7 feet. Signs shall be 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and shall have black or red letters and border on a
white background. (UFC Sec. 901.4.5.(1) (2) & (3))
"Working" Smoke Detectors Save Lives
11) PAINTED CURBS, Fire appa*access roadway curbs shall be painted yellow*marked "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" at
each 25 feet. Lettering shall have a stroke of not less than one inch wide by six inches high. (UFC Sec. 901.4.52)
12) COMMERCIAL BUELDINGS - MINIMUM NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS- The minimum number of fine hydrants for
a building shall be based on the required fire flow prior to giving any credits for fire protection systems. There shall not be less
than one (1) fine hydrant for the fast 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM) required fire flow and one (1) additional fire hydrant for
each 1,000 GPM or portion thereof over 2,000 GPM. Fire hydrants shall be evenly spaced around the building and their
locations shall be approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2. 1)
13) COMMERCIAL BUELDINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS• No portion of the exterior of a commercial building shall be located
more than 250 feet from a fire hydrant when measured in an approved manner around the outside of the building and along an
approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.1)
14) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - FIRE HYDRANTS• Fire hydrants for single family dwellings and duplexes shall be
placed at each intersection. Intermediate fire hydrants are required if any portion of a structure exceeds 500 feet from a hydrant
as measured in an approved manner around the outside of the structure and along approved fire apparatus access roadways.
Placement of additional fire hydrants shall be as approved by the Chief. (UFC Sec. 903.422)
15) ERE HYDRANT DISTAN FROM N ACCESS ROAD• Fine hydrants shall not be located more than 15 feet from an
approved fire apparatus access roadway. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.4)
16) FIRE HYDRANT I FIRE DEPARTMENT CWMCTION• A fire hydrant shall be located within 70 feet of a fire
department connection (FDC). Fire hydrants and FDC's shall be located on the same side of the fire apparatus access roadway.
(UFC Sec. 903.42.5) FDC locations shall be as approved by the Chief. (1996 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Sec. 904.1.1)
17) FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS ON B MDINS• Fire department connections shall not be located on the building
that is being protected. (UFC Sec. 903.4.2.5)
18) COMMERCIAL BUTT D N S - FOUMEED FIRE FLOW The required fire flow for the building shall not exceed 3,000
gallons per minute (GPM) or the available GPM in the water delivery system at 20 psi. A worksheet for calculating the required
fire flow is available from the Fire Marshal's office. (UFC Sec. 903.3)
19) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS - REOIIIRF.D FIRE FLOW The minimum available fire flow for single family dwellings
and duplexes shall be 1,000 gallons per minute. If the structure(s) are 3,600 square feet or larger, the required fire flow shall be
determined according to UFC Appendix Table A-111-A- 1. (UFC Appendix III-A, Sec. 5)
20) RURAL BUILDINGS - RFO iTRF,D F. FLOWe Required fire flow for rural buildings shall be calculated in accordance
with National Fire Protection Association Standard 1231. Please contact the Fire Marshal's office for special help and other
requirements that will apply. (UFC Sec. 903.3)
21) ACCESS AND FIRF.FIGHTIN, WATER SUPPLY DURING CONSTRUCTION: Approved fire apparatus access
roadways and fire fighting water supplies shall be installed and operational prior to any other construction on the site or
subdivision. (UFC Sec. 8704)
22) KNOX BOX: A Knox Box for building access is required for this building. Please contact the Fire Marshal's Office for an
application and instructions regarding installation and placement.
23) REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: Please contact the Fire Marshal's office at the appropriate times for inspection of the following:
24)
25)
26)
Plan Reviewer Signature Title
" • V
RECEIVED pIANN ITY OF TIGARD
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS JUL 0 9 1996
DATE: July 3. 1996
TO: Kelley Jennings. Tigard Police Dept. Crime Prevention Officer
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x317)
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE:
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 96-001 i/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0003
➢ JEFFREY PARTITION Q
The applicant is requesting approval to partition one (1) 1.81 acre lot into three (3) lots of 20,003, 28,371
and 30,872. LOCATION: 14520 SW Fern Street (WCTM 2S1 04BC, Tax Lot 1100). ZONE: R-7
(Single-family residential, 5,000 square feet attached per unit). The purpose of the R-7 zoning district is
to establish sites for attached and detached single-family residences. APPLICABLE REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.96, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.162 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15, 1996. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
_ Please refer to the enclosed letter.
Written comments provided below:
•t
(,Pkzsepmvi&t&efoamdnginfonwtion) Name of Person(s) Commentin .
Phone Number(s):
MLP 96-0011/SLR 96.0003 JEFFREY PARTITION PROPOSAUREQUEST FOR COMMENTS
RECEIVED PLANNING
Isom
JUL 08 1~~6 CITY OF
TIGARD
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
DATE: July 3. 1996
TO: David Scott, Building Official
FROM: City of Tigard Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Mark Roberts (x3171
Phone: (503) 639-4171 Fax: (503) 684-7297
RE:
MINOR LAND PARTITION (MLP) 96-0011/SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW (SLR) 96-0003
➢ JEFFREY PARTITION Q
The applicant is requesting approval to partition one (1) 1.81 acre lot into three (3) lots of 20,003, 28,371
and 30,872. LOCATION: 14520 SW Fern Street (WCTM 2S1 0413C, Tax Lot 1100). ZONE: R-7
(Single-family residential, 5,000 square feet attached per unit). The purpose of the R-7 zoning district is
to establish sites for attached and detached single-family residences. APPLICABLE REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.52, 18.84, 18.88, 18.92, 18.96, 18.102, 18.106,
18.108, 18.162 and 18.164.
Attached is the Site Plan, Vicinity Map and Applicant's Statement for your review. From information supplied by
various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will
be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this
application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: Monday - July 15, 1996. You may use the space provided
below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date, please
phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Department, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223.
PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY:
We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it.
Please contact of our office.
Please refer to the enclosed letter.
>e, Written comments provided below:
J
,~.-eel. s cr -Qer ~obl~ - ' ~t~ ~ ~c~.:• o,•~ e~ s o s~
C.ev~~ ear. ~t`sw. G~+~\ '2Nvj1K?~2x O~v~~-- ~eti- vZ ce.~ t~~ ~(aw~
(,Prime tkefoanving infomatlon) Name of Person(s) Commenting: V"~Wk
Phone Number(s): :S`I\
MLP 964)0111SLR 96.0003 JEFFREY PARTITION PROPOSAUREOIJEST FOR COMMENTS
5
C,c,v_"~p
v\-P ckc, - ook
„ I 50.00' WIDE EASEMENT HILLSHIRE WOODS '
LOT 40 PER DEED DOCUMENT ~ LOT f 0
N0. 96045842 ~ LOT 39 LOT 38 , •
C5 129.72' 8130.07' cs , i }c ) ~ J f TH A. JEFFERY
Y E, AND JUDITH A. E LAND PARTITION FOR HARK 0 0 41.04 i (E) p ,1 0 0 ~ l " soo 32 07 HELD, ~
~ S003358 W, 50,01 ~ A PORTION OF LOTS 16 AND 17, HANDY A ~ ~ " 25.00 ~ ~ N G A REPEAT OF N 08.88 O - "HANDY ACRES",
N 41.05' C4 C3 {3}(S00 34 26 W, 50.01') I _ 209.OD~~2}(2_„_) CTION 4 T2S I n / -~r+---- - " LOCATED IN THE SW 1 4 AND NW 1/4 OF SE , q 4, T2S, R1 W, WM,
b N89 26 31 W -r'-- S89'27'S3 W, 348.63 , {2}(S89 27 53 W) b ~ , 0 oHELD{3} o NEED CITY OF TIGARD WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON o {6}(50.00) OREGON
N • RECORD 4s. 5' SW FERN STREET N (F) , N c1 c2 ' ' $ 5' 79.94', 6 80,03 DECEMBER 31, 1997
25.04 4.8 ~ 7 (A) j 41.05 9.91 I {6}30.0 , 170.04', {5}(170.03) '
(B) ' 1 1 1 II 1 1 6 50.00' I L281 ' t (D) . HELD rn L191L2 L11 )I I 11 1
HELD ~ i I / IN I ,HELD , N_S I ; l~) IJ I I1 _
I I I E W ~ ~ TANGENT CHORD BEARING D4 i I HELD I I I , 22,00 ,22.0o CURVE RADIUS LENGTH " , DELTA
I I 125' WIDE PGE EASEMENT PER C1 175.00' 20.04' 10.03 20.03 S86 09 39 E O6 , I I I I Lr---- 3 1 " "E 06'33'44"
LOT 39 , , I I ~ oocuM~NT No. 88004#86 C2 225.00 30.06 15.05 30.04 S86 42 27 E 07 , i i i I , 3 ~ ~ , , , " "E 07'39'20" "W 07'39'20"
, i i I I C3 200.00 26.72 13.38 26.70. N86'42 27 W 07 , 100.00 I I I I I, 3 06'. "W 06'33'44"
I I I I ~ 3 C4 200.00 22.91 11.47 22.89 N86 09 39 W PO R i I I I I' N "W 06'33'44"
BONNEVILLE WE I I ~t, 225.00' 25.77' 12.90' 25.76' N86'09'39"W 06'~ MINISTRATION BOOK 198, I I i I I . i 3 C5 ~ ~ , AD i i I I ~ rn C6 ~ 175.00 23.38 11.71 23.37 S86 42 27 E 07 "E 07'39'20"
n 1 3 " , PAGE 394 (1941) ~ ~ I i I ' a 17.34' 24.28' S44'S7 44 E 91 ' "E 91'08'45"
I I~ I ~ N 2 C7 17.00 27.04 I, I ' N 7 .40' S12'48'35"E 26' "F 26'50'27"
T I I ,piM1 ~ I~, ~ N. 2 C8 ~ 1022.00 478J7 243.86 4 4 40 WIDE 8PA EASEMEN I ~ N ao IN I , N ' 1' 464.19' S12'48'35"E 26' E 26'50'27"
PER BOOK 461, PAGE 273 I ~N u , DOCUMENT N0. 93078081 2 Cg 1000.00 468.46 238 6 1962 I I i:'~ N I I. N, ( ) i 10 N I i 1`h
I I O I I, M -
I I IVI I , N r ' I I " , I I I' N ~ Li.1
LOT 32 20.00 wIDE a.oo -a ~ PRIVATE ACCESS i i D8 I I € ~ ~ A FOUND 5 8" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC.", 0.4' E I 1+ ; D8 12.00 w ,r O /
EASEMENT, SEE I I I i , ~ ~ D1 .WOK 198, PAGE 394 1941 I _ ~ ) SET IN {3}, HELD.
NOTE 3 (SHEET 2) i ~ 00 i ~ OOK 461 PAGE 273 1962 " I ) I M ~ Z " B FOUND 1 2 IRON PIPE 0.4 BELOW GROUND, SET IN {i}, HELD N-S, LOCATED S8 7 ,
I ' `0 . I I. ~ D3 BOOK 483 PAGE 332 1963 ~ " I r ( ) ~ I ~ ~ I , ~ M O NW CORNER D5 .
I n I II o ~ D4 DOCUMENT N0. 84042203 I ~ I , CALCULATED BY ~ O, r " i ON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "SCHELSKY L.S. 1841", 0.1'
I I ~ I I ' STANCE-DISTANCE Z Z 0,. DO.UMENT NO. 89057728 (C) FOUND 5/8 R I I , I DI W 'b6" DOCUMENT N0. 9001$374 SET IN {6}, HELD. IG., INC.", 0.4 BELOW GROUND,
TRACT ~ ~ I INTERSECTION HOLDING €6} (H) N, " BOOK 198, I I IM ' N [n D7 DOCUMENT N0. 90023058
F 1941 N a I I , HELD o ~ , „ (D) FOUND 5/e" IRON REBAR D.3' ABOVE GROUND, SE7 iN {5}, LOCATED S00'32'07"E, 0.05' OF PAGE 394 ( ) I I ~ I 130 4 D1~ DOCUMENT N0. 91012893 ED S89'27'53"W, 0.13' FROM THE
I I ~ ~I I I. N89'36'35"E N-S ~ O' „ „ , OI ~ M I , , ~ Z D9 DOCUMENT N0. 92060370 (E) FOUND 5/8 IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED ALPHA ENG., INC. , 0.9 E
° I I 199J5, 6(200.02) ~ ~ " -ji I in 010 DOCUMENT N0. 93078081 SET IN {2}, LOCATED N00'32 07 W, 0.11' OF R/W. 6J.S_ 1841". 0.1' BELOW GROUND.
~ I ~ iv I w APPROXIMATE I ; w "D'1° DOCUMENT NO. 930808498 ~ ~ q j ~ I LOCATION OF ~ LOT LINE PER s'. 171 (F) FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE 0.3' BELOW GROUND, SET IN {1}, HELD.
~ I ~ ~ I I uTILITY AND I .f , X12 DOCUMENT N0. 94025 N M 01 M I , „ ~ I rr n" I ~ t ~ I ROADWAY } , HANDY ACRES o, 013 DOCUMENT N0. 96045842
I ° I , " (G) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR ',"JITH ALUMINUM CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC. IN MONUMEN Ji
LOT 31 ~ I; I o I EASEMENT AND I N 0.4 DOCUMENT NO. 97077758 SURVEYED PUNCH MARK IN CAP, HELD FOR CENTERLINE OF R/W AND BASIS OF BEARING. I ~ I z MAINTENANCE 3 M I n I ~ 'v "015" DOCUMENT NO. 98004486 l b
, I In I I AGREEMENT i 1~ - ~ " IR N REBAR- WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "SCHELSKY L.S. 1841", 0.1 ~ N ~ I „ " N, Q I (H) FOUND 5/8 0 " ti
W N ~ ~ ~ I D8 } N N $ET IN {61. L(1~ATF(1 cgo~p2 da n eT Gf (t, ;4, ri`LD iJ•°$. v I p I d' I M " J
Q I ~ I Mi ' D "ALPHA ENG. INC. IN MONUMENT o I ~ ~ ~ ~ I FOUND 5 8" IRON REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP INSCRIBE , a K h~~ / h"" o I~ I " I • N ~ F R W AND BASIS OF BEA
(n to =r D8 20.00 w • • ~ " SURVEYED PUNCH MARK IN ALUMINUM CAP, HELD FOR CENTERLINE 0 / o w ~ , i I I '00 ~ 1 : SUE3DIVISION PLAT, HANDY ACRES (1945)
I IN NN l ~ t " ~ p " IG., INC. 0.9' BELOW GROUND,
Y ~ M I I I I s22: SU:3DIVISION PLAT, "HILLSHIRE WOODS (1995) (J) FOUND 5/8 IRON REBAR WITH ALUMINUM CAP (NSCRIBED ALPHA ENG., INC. IN MONUMEN I ~ I I la DOCUMENT NO. 90018374 ;'~hN , 2 i I ALUMINUM CAP IS LOCATED N47'08'25"E, 0.3' OF THE CENTERLINE OF R/ W ~ ' I I I ~ ' ° ff SU'DIVISION PLAT "i~ILLSHIRE CREEK THE PUNCH MARK N
W ; I I I ,W o o, • t3~• CURVATURE. I z o I ~ ~ 10 , I I I ~a0 vzr°~ ~ E-STATES (1996) ,
U " I I `0 I ~ ° +OLLOW" (K) FOUND 5/8° IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC.", 0.1 E ro I I \ ~M „ „ ~ ~4~: SU~3DIVISION PLAT, HILLSHIRE H N48'OS'25°E 0.29' OF R W AND POINT OF CURVATURE. C." IN MONUMENT BOX, SET IN {21,
W 3 M i I \ o N ~ SET IN {2}, LOCATED / ° , , ~ I h HANDY ACRES PROPOSED (1997) BEARING.
~ ~ p I \ ~ ,Z I " , - N I I . ~ 1978 N FOUND 5 8 IRON REBAR 1.2' BELOW GROUND, SET IN {6}, LOCATED N89'38'34"E, 0,77 OF 2 M I i \ \ J J {5~: SN 17876 ( ) (L) / ' L.S 1841" 0.1' BELOW GROUND.
~ o " " I I I ' AY AND UTILITY ~ ff6 : SN 20735 (1984)
.J D4 15.0 ' \S , ROADW I i f USN SET IN 1 HELD o I . I \ " " 3 (M) FOUND 1/2 IRON PIPE FL { J y i I \ \ I, EASEMENT D4 DOCUMENT ~ ~ ~ €7~; SN 23823 (1990)
= ROADWAY AND UTILITY I i ' N0. 84042203 ~ v HELD i \'.T ~ ~ HELD • ~ f $ : SN 25841 1994) (N) FOUND 5/8" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC.", 0.2' ,
• EASEMENT "D4" DOCUMENT I I \ _ 1v SET IN {4}, LOCATED N00'23'19 W, 0.20 OF THE WESTERLY NORTH LINE OF LOT 37 {2}. No. 84042203 i I ` I\ INITIAL POINT N S w E
t I I ' ` L21 ago w I " " , (L) _ ; ~ z r ~ (0) FOUND 5/e IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC. , 0.1 i ' ~ 1
- i - \ S~ '38'34"W, 249,55, {6}(250.01) I~ N ~ S '1 "W 0.10' OF THE WESTERLY NORTH LINE OF lOT 37 {2}. ! I I ~ ' - 4.92' I~ r , SET IN {4}, LOCATED N00 23 9 , i'
• I I 79.89' _ ~ L22 47.35' 4 , SCALE -_r- -7 - 155.08 94.47 UND SET IN 1 LOCATED N00'34'18"E, 0.22' OF T
~ I T HELD L17' ~ I ' (P) FOUND 1/2 IRON PIPE 1.3 BELOW GRO { 1 O _ 1 =50 I ~ { , ~ NORTH LINE OF LOT 37 {2}, HELD E-W.
I i ' 40.00 PRIVATE ACCESS 40.00 I 125' PGE EASEMENT, I ~ , 2 ' 50' OW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "ALPHA ENG., INC.", FLUSI
I , EASEMENT PER PLAT 50 0 0 (Q) FOUND 5/8 IRON REBAR WITH YELL I i PER DOCUMENT N0. ) , pF HILLSHIRE WOODS" I ,
- 4 c I I 98004486-~~ PARCEL 2 ; . ~ (R) FOUND 1/2" IRON PIPE 0.9' BELOW GROUND, SET IN {1j, LOCATED S84'14 38 W, 0.33 OF . D BASIS OF BEARING.
28,795 SQ FT o0• N ~ „ 11 ll Ire 01 IN MONUMENT BOX. SET IN #21.
TRACT E rn (S) FOUND 3-1/4" ALUMINUM DISK INSCRIBED 1/4 CORNER COMMON TO SECTION 4 AND 5, T I ~ N v WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR", 1.0' BELOW GROUND, SEE USBT BOCK 7, PAGE 543. THIS I NTERLINE OF R/W AND POINT OF
M . I I I' (A)-(~): DESCRIPTIONS OF FOUND MONUMENTS CONTROL MONUMENT STATION DESIGNATION GC_022_122, PER SN GC22, HELD. BONNEVILLE POWER II ~ C ~ ~
ADMINISTRATION BOOK 198, ~ ~ I ; o ? ~ ;MONUMENT FOUND AS SHOWN " . ~ ~ ~C \~2 ~ ~ ~ ® (T) FOUND 5/8 IRON REBAR 0.4 BELOW GROUND, SET IN {6}, HELD. 4G., INC.", 0.1' ABOVE GROUND,
PAGE 394 (1941) o \j~ _ ___Ls ~ w ~ ~ C8 C9 :MONUMENT SET, 5 8"x30" REBAR WITH
I + ; " ~ _ PARCEL 1 ~ N O 1 100.00 ~ ~ ~.N89'3738 E, L5 10.00 180.00 3 aow YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED RAJ LS 2725 ' 18,823 SQ FT , Ar n ~'7nC O IIAl LJCI n AI_C
2s.o8, , I ~ 10.00 ~ h lMt i I, 2.93' 01• O ;RECORD MEASUREMENT
~ i roi II 1 15 WIDE PUBLIC o
~ ~ °I ~ li' WATER LINE o v°o I :MAP RECORD REFERENCE REC4STEli 15 WIDE PUBLIC r~ ~ ~ ~ti ~ I, EASEMENT N N z '
SANITARY SEWER , , I I, f~(50' ; ~~LD RECORD SURVEY MEASUREMENT PROF'E551g dG., INC.", 0.2' ABOVE GROUND,
EASEMENT ~ ~ ~I ~ii~ ~ ~ ~ SEE SHEET 2 FOR LAND SURD I ~ ~N JURVtY NUMBER, WCSR o~/ h ~I ~h of 5 f 37 {2}.
J J 1 ~ I PARCEL 3 ~ , EASEMENT LINE LABELS EODETIC CONTROL I III 33,860 SQ FT WCSR :WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS .In n.ln " n I' AQM/C 1-0l111Aln
MONUMENT, STATION ~ I I ~ AND NOTES.
DESIGNATION GC_022_122 i i I II;HELD ~ TON COUNTY DEED RECORDS GREG ~ ~ I N I I E_W WCDR :WASHING JULY 25, '
~ i I III I I w i' , l ~ „ „ C WCDR R ERT ALAN . r ~ , (P) .49 2 169,x7 .DEED REFEREN E, OB
129.73,E{2}(1Q9.84) ,II, 169 , € ) I ELD D 2725 R r i (0) x4,15 ` ,r „ 1 L8 205.0' D1 50 ;HELD RECORD DEED MEASUREMENT
_ N_89'36 41"E, 100.02 (M) 2 N 9'35'58"E,~100.01'~ - 56,57 - ,'~39,38'~' 32.13 43.22 N 83.25 _ EXPIRES 6/ j
HEED(S) € }(e ) 124.96 4.76 a i' R/W :RIGHT OF-WAY LINE ~ (Q) N89'36'41"E, 299,22' c 8"E, 0.22' OF THE WESTERLY
ROBERT ALAN JOHNSON, PL. LOT 25 z Na9'35'S8"E, 299,31) ° C1 .CURVE DESIGNATION { / ~ , " 1 ( )
N89'36 41 E, 399,24 K N TION W GRE:ENBURG RD L1 ;EASEMENT LINE DESIG A 11500 S
TRACT "A" LOT 1 LOT 2 TRACT "G" _ _ _ RAL ELECTRIC EASEMENT TIGARD, OREGt?N 97223 (5( PGE (PORTLAND GENE ) NG, INC.% FLUSH, SET IN 4.
" QW" - BPA BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION) EASEMENT S~ HILLSHIRE ROLL
'ION 4 AND 5, T2S, R1 W, 1993 GE 543. THIS IS ALSO GEODETIC
~''t t
. 1 •
KI J0.
I ROBERT ALAN JOHNSON H APPROVED THIS DAY OF aHt,~~r 199 y EREBY ~ERTIFY THAT I HAVE CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MARKED WITH ~
PROPER M NUM T • 0 EN S, IN ACCORDANCE WITH OREGON REVISED STATUTES, THE LAND REPRESENTED ON 10.
THIS PLAT AND DESCRIBED BELOW. BY; LAND PARTITION FOR HARRY E, AND JUDITH JUDITH A. JEFFERY
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 4, T2S, R1W, WM IN THE CI OF TIGARD: CITY ENGINEER A REPEAT OF A PORTION OF LOTS 16 AND 17, "HAP
CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: D N 1 ~ OF SECTION 4 D 17, "HANDY ACRES",
LOCATED IN THE SW 1 4 AN W 1 ~ ~ SECTION 4, T2S, R1 W, WM,
BEGINNING AT THE INITIAL POI T CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGI~ON COUNTY, ORf N , A 5/8 X 30 IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED )UNTY, OREGON
"RAJ LS 2725" SET AT THE SOUTHERLY NE CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT N0. DECEMBER 31, 1997 97
89057728 (WCDR), SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SE CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT
N0. 90018374 (WCDR) AND BEING N89'36'41"E, 399.24 FEET AND N00'37'12"E, 199.58 FEET FROM FILE NAME: JEFFERY PARTITION TI ON
THE WEST 1 4 CORNER OF S " APPROVED THIS ^DAY OF .1998 / ECTION 4, T2S, R1W, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, WITNESSED BY A 3 1 4 CASEFILE NO.. MLP 96-0011 > / ALUMINUM DISK; THENCE 889 38 34 1~ COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW: SLR 96-000 11
DOCUMENT N0. 90018374 WCDR) 249.55 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY EAST LINE OF THE LAND SLR 96-0003
DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT N0. 89057728; THENCE N00'33'S5"E ON SAID NORTHERLY EAST LIN BY.. E
435.89 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SW FERN STREET; THENCE S89'27'S3'W ON THE
ABOVE MENTIONED RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 49.85 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
BOOK 198, PAGE 394 (1941 WCDR); .THENCE S00'33'58"W COINCIDENT WITH SAID EAST LINE 635.48 )N
FEET TO THE SW CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT N0. 89057728 WCDR AND THE KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS THAT HARRY E. AND ( ) NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT A , SUBDIVISION PLAT HILLSHIRE HOLLOW"; THENCE N89'36'41"E ON A L JEFFERY, THE FEE OWNERS OF THE LAND REPRESENTED ON TE ,RRY E. AND JUDITH A.
„ „ „ „ L TAXES, FEES, ASSESSMENTS, , THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT A ,LOTS 1 AND 2, AND TRACT G OF SAID SUBDIVISION PLAT AND THE MAP AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE SURVEYOR ~ FNTFn ON _THF ATTAr,HFn
SOUTH LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT N0. 890 7 OR OTHER CHARGES AS PROVIDED STATE THAT THEY C 5 728 (WCDR) 299.22 FEET TO THE SE AUSED SAID LAND TO BE SURVEYED AND
CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND; THENCE N00'37'12"E ON THE NORTHERLY WEST LINE OF BY O.R.S. 92095 HAVE BEEN PAID INTO PARCELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAT
TRACT "G" 199.58 FEET TO THE INITIAL POINT. OF THE OREGON REVISED STATUTES, AND DO HEREBY GRANT AS OF 1998 ZVEYED AND PARTITIONED
EASEMENTS AS SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON. ONS OF CHAPTER NO. 92
DIRECTOR, ;EBY GRANT ALL
DIVISION OF AS~~SSMEN i' & TAXATION,
WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON
' ARRY .JEFF RY JUDITH A. JE /A - 14,10
BY
pEPUTY ~ ~ ~t-YJ7r' ■
THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO PARTITION THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT N0. 89057728 (WCDR).
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON HELD FOUND MONUMENTS (G) AND (I) SET IN ■ Mf
SUBDIVISION PLAT HILLSHIRE WOODS" FOR THE CENTERLINE OF SW ASCENSION DRIVE. THE RECORD BEARING BETWEEN SAID POINTS IS N00'36'38"E. STATE OF OREGON
SS THE PROPERTY CORNERS OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT N0. COUNTY OF WASHINGTG~N ~r
89057728 WCDR ARE ST . _ STATE OF . ( ) E ABLISHED AS FOLLOWS:
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY .THAT THIS PARTITION PLAT WAS SS THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY OFFSETTING THE WEST LINE 1~; '
COUNTY OF OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN "D1° CONTROLLED BY HELD FOUND MONUMENTS RECEIVED FOR RECORD' GN THIS _DAY OF
(A) AND (S) 100.00 FEET EAST PER "D1'. THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE BEING _ ~ 11'' _ 1998, AT Ot,LOCK M ~ ANO RECOIRDED ,'J THIS CERTIFIES THAT ON TH S _N - , I I _DAY OF r~t7t►M~•cr ,1998 TNT
COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-O~-WAY LINE OF SW FERN STREET IS ~ I I~~ I celn.~ d ' a i Tv o o~ THE COUNTY~CEERK. RECORDS. A NOTARY. PJB_..,._N. AND , OR ..T„~~= COl,N, , E.,. ESTABLISHED BY HELD FOUNG MOi;UME~fTS~(B)- HELD N=S AND`(G): THE'. . ,
APPEARED HARRY E. JEFFERY AND JUDITH A. JEFFERY, WHO U WESTERLY EAST BOUNDARY LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY HELD FOUND MONUMENTS .
DULY SWORN, DID HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY SIGNED T (C) AND (T). THE SOUTHERLY NORTH BOUNDARY LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY BY '
INSTRUMENT FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY. HELD FOUND MONUMENTS (L) HELD N-S AND (T). THE EASTERLY EAST x1998 BEFORE ME, }
BOUNDARY LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY HELD FOUND MONUMENTS F AND M . DEPUTY C N Y o O O OU T, CLERK FFIC1aL, .OUNTY, PERSONALLY
THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE IS ESTABLISHED BY MELD FOUND MONUMENTS (M) KELLYNUF NOTARY PU9LN iERY, WHO UPON BEING
AND (S). THE PROPERTY CORNERS ARE ESTA LISHED BY THE INT R B E SECTIONS coM~ISSION STATE OF OREGON MY COMMISSIO N IEY SIGNED THE ABOVE
OF THE BOUNDARY LINES DESCRIBED ABOVE AND AS DEPICTED ON THE N EXPIRES ATT SS J. ACHED MAP. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON NOTARY P BLIC
R, OFFfCIAI SEAL
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS TRACING IS A COPY,
CERTIFIED TO ME BY THE SURVEYOR OAF THIS PARTITION
PLAT, TO BE A TRUE AND EXACT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL,
AND THAT IT WAS RECORDED ON THE _DAY OF ,
199$, AT O'CLOCK,_M, AND RECORDED IN THE LINE DIREC110N DISTANCE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE
L1 S89'27'S3"W 10.00' L19 N89'27'S3 E 15,00 COUNTY CLERK RECORDS.
L2 889'27'83"W 10.00' L20 SDO'33'S8"W 420.78 L3 800'33'88 W 494.83' L21 S89'38'34"W 234.61' BY _ w ' -
L4 Na9'37'38 E 63,91' L22 N89'38'34"E 27.84' -
LS Na9'3738"E 84.07' L23 N44' 6' 'W ' 2 D5 112.97 DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK
Lfi N89'37'38 E 64.24' L24 N00'33 55 E 143.52 L7 S00'33'S8'W 495.21' L25 N45'32'23 E 59.39' - ti
L8 889'36'41"W 15.99' L26 N00'32'23"E 170.00'
L9 N19'51'44'E 146.41' L27 N89'27'S3"E 8.00'
L10 N89'37'38"E 15.99' L28 N89'27'S3"E 12.00' L11 819'81'44"w 106.41' L29 S00'32'23"W 225.89'
L12 N89'36'41 E 15.00' L30 S89'36'35"W 12,00' A CONSENT FI
AF DAVIT FROM BANK UNITED, FSB, A TRUST DEED BENEFICIARY, h L13 N00'29'28"E 99.84 L31 N89'21'37"W 8.00' L
L14 Nas'37 3a"E 15.00' L32 Noo'32'23"E 27,43' BEEN RECORDED IN DOCUMENT N0. ,WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED L15 N00'29'28"E 99,84' L33 S45'32'23"w 31,11' RECORDS. t
L16 S00'21'26"E 15,00' L34 S00'33'S5°W 126.95'
L17 sas'38'34"w 249.88' L35 S44'26'D5"E 124.05' REGl~TERED A CONSENT AFFIDAVIT FROM PACIFIC ONE BANK A TRUST DEED BENEFICIAR
L18 N00'33'S8"E 435.74' P Y' ~ ROiESSIONAL BEEN RECORDED IN DOCUMENT N0. WASHINGTON COUNTY DEED
lANO ~URYEYOR RECORDS.
_
OREGON
JULY 25, 1995
ROBERT ALAN JOHNSON
2725
EXPIRES 6/30/99 1. THiS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL k
PER CITY OF TIGARD CASE FILE N0. MLP 96-0011 .j
2. 20.00' WIDE JOINT ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ROBERT AL,~N JOHNSON, PL OWNERS OF PA CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA s-
RCELS 2 AND 3. THE OWNERS OR OWN 11500 SW GREENBUR ER OF ~ ~ G RD PARCELS 2 AND 3 SHALL JOINTLY AND E U C10 50.00 79.36 50.83 71.29 S44'S411 E 90'5618 ~ Q ALLY MAINTAIN ANY AND C11 ~ TIGARD, OREGON 97223
ALL IMPROVEMENTS MADE ON SAID EASEMENT. 40.00 63.49 40.66 57.03 S44 5411E 90 5618
C12 30.00' 47.62' 30.50' 42.77' N44'54'11 "W 90'56'18" S
~ i
Ii
I
_ - ~i~a~y _ N ~ y < 3j 1 pa SY U 9p~ g1~ f i a c fsr g 'C w s~ G= u a ! ~
, ti G ~ I IsoD SW~ a S~X~OSDREr 14 ox ~°a~
. 31 7 K. ` ~ sDD y- q 15 l I fi ~ ~ p ~Y , ~ 32 ..:~D S ~ P+ D !
SW LYI(L SM SILEA RIDE 1 4 HJPR/INILL s a~ LN us ~ mpr f sv fry' o ° A ~ ~ OPEM SPA E 1"~0 0~ ~
a ~ ~ `"Y~.A a"' PiN1A7L ~ FARC ~ 1 ~ 1
HIGH NILL UI' ~ r ' rt ~ APPLICANT. HARRY E. d JUDITH A. JEFfRE 33 iartA:f AIDER y ~L S0, ~ J
14520 S.W. FERN STREET I~~°~ '~0' ° a ~y 3 ALE ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ TIC7ARD, CRE60N 81223
S rz PH• (503) 524-0431 ~ ^ SW ALVORD LN ~~S Y+s w ~
g i7 ..f1>t~ 1y1~ ~ 5PA1N6B~1K lN3
PROPOSAL: 3-LOT MINOR PARTITION d q o ITIVE LANDS REVIEW - 5EN5 I
~ r,s EXISTING ZONtN6: R-l ~ a~ u a n 03~ 1 ! ',rs 4~ s
5M N Et - it , 51ZE• 1,88 ACRES
~ ~ 1 4~g4'~ EE TOPOGRAPHY: FIELD SURVEY -LAND DEVELOPEP1ENT CONSULTANTS ~ ~ J $ , sW 'scNOtLS o,
SY plfll R 5Y L sy Y `aILaR a+} :11200 SN FpiENO Y R0 ~ L>~ ~~ne'o . rt ~ Y1Y as 9~ i ~ ~ I-
: AVERAGE LoT SIZE: ta,165 ~ FT s ~ `f4'F~~oyaiiaAr u": sa yy r.u '
si ,f -
LEG^AL DESCRIPTION: TAX LOT 1100 ~QF"R'+c~°`~ a ~ I TAX MAP 251-4BG ">w~` wt~~K, i - o I
5 ~ p1 GifYC?I~ a sib p~ Q4- d ri
STORM d ~ Is1ao ~ ~ e ° SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF TIGARD r
SY ~ L ,ia n _ , t,p
CITY OF TI6ARD ~ ~ ~ ,~'`s Isoo! ,svuxc~ ~'~enLy WATER: a ~'1~ans a~. ~ ~~j SW NiT,N ioR w i=LT '~~i` aP O[ 5a 13 ~ 1s~r ~ ~DBT-
NAIURAL 6A5• NORTHWEST NATURAL rA5
pV~ Cam' b fNl~~ M~~ VEC
E1.EGIRIG: PGE. - - - N ~151~
5~~ TELEPHONE. G T.E. G ~l.~~
FIRE T.V FIRE d RESCUE 1
_ tij
500°42'5"W 66.20 ~oo.o-~"
2CXi.4i' 22626' ( 20'0' ~1 1
i
20,003 SO FT
EX{5T4N6
u o c ~~~~r.-
o _ ~
- ~ .j•~=
0 ~ • _ ~ ~
~ ~ " 201Q' -
I N ~ 100' i00' -
0 - Y N ~ ~ a _ 2 3
o
~ 11,496 SL~.FT 19,99 `_~~.FT. ~ O
° ~ 0 Q/
Q ~ ~ ~
~ ~ St
- ~ ~ aM G ~ f a~ ~
~ -
F. ~ G p _ p Y`.
i~ I ,Ib'SLL to 3a00,E1~v00N ~
0 - - ~ I ~ ~ L ~ ~ T ~ ~
0
C~ ~ 5' rv ;2
435.73' M.OO,~b.005 i ~ ~ `1~ 10' -
I ~ D° 0 b~c 436' m
' , . 's ~ 4t1' L='f0 ~ _ + m ~
o. ~ _ _ ~ ~ R=~ d- rd" cv ~ °
,~yg R t, i
420' L,2~` 20' ~ ° p~ , bib
ZL
N 0 - ,Y - ~ 1
8~,~~v~at ~LLt ~',~~~`v1=~? ~~~~~'w~`~~;~r~~TIC~~V ~1"~L;rMF~y1 0
S - 0
1
i
1 s~ ' ~ Y
` ,D~'S'~'9 ~ 00 t~ OON I~ o
NGRTN
\ i
Zr
50 9 ~ t~ i
"Y '
1 inch = 50 ft.
•3::~
-Y -E
` 1
11 r "'~y
_
ti
i I 1
1 ,
~ I I
1
I I
I I ,
I ' I 11
1 ~ I ~
~ I ~ I 1
, I
1
1
I ~ ~ I y ,i
r* ~
~ ,
~ I
i `
I i ~ I, I ~l
1 ~ I
1 I
~I i I i
~4
I ti ~ ~ ~ I,
~ ~ ~ I~ 1,
~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
~N 1 ( f, r f. I
r i ~ ~ i~ /iii
I s ~ t ..,i l i~ j 1
~ , ~ ~ ~
~ ► ► r IS1 1 ~ v I ! I~ \ ► ~
\ \ i I I
ti 1 ► ~ ~ ~ I i I/ 1 ► I ~ r
I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I 1 l l t i ~ ~ \ ~ 1 I ~ 1 ! I « ~ ~ \ I a i ,
~ ~ ~ ~I i \ ~ 1 ~ t ~I r~, ~ ~ 1 ~
~ 1 / I I ~ I ~ ~ y,..,. ~ 1 / i ~ ~ ( ~ n ~ 1 ~ ~ i r l ~ 11 ~ ! i 1
\ ~ I I ► ~ ~ I ~ ~ \ ~ ~ 1 r~ i
~ I _ ► I i 1 1 i I ( ~ 1 , ~ ~ ► I <<i i I ~
\ C~ I 1 11 ~ ~ A ~ 1 r~, i 1 ,
\ ~ D I I e + I I l r ~ 4 i I B S I 1 ( ~ i I I I. 1. .~l
1 I i ,1 it \ I ,~o c ~ ~ j ~ I I , , , ~ ,
~ I ) i1 ~ ~r1 I r~~' 1 1~~
~ 1 ~ ~ 1 _ I l C/ I J l t~ l ~ I i
~ 1 i I l l i r~ r.- r l I I I ~ , s ~ ~ I.
\ ~ ~ ~ A 1 11 f 1 _a 1 ~ 1 ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 1 1 ~
1 i t ~ I ~ i ~ - k ~ 11 I ~ i TI ~ l 1 ~ ~ A 1 I I 11 X 1 1 l ~
~ I X 1 1 ~ 11 / ~ ( t 1 1 - ~ ? ~ ~ I I ,1 ~ I I ~ , ~ ~ ( 1 ~ ~
~ 1 ~ 1 a~ I l \ ~ f ~ i I 1~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ►J 1
1 V 1 ~ ~ ► I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ _ v ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ i i ~ , ~ I I ~ 1 I ~ ~ t / 1 I
\ \ t it r l I ~ A + ( ~ - I ~ ~ i t ~ ~ 1 V ~ ~I l ~ ~ ~ ~ I ! I ~ , ~ ~
, \ 1 1, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ l~ ~ 1 ~ v ~ ~ 1~ I ~ ~ 1 i ( 1 1
r ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I ~ 1 ~ ~ t_ ~ ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ 1 ~ A ~ 1 ~ ~z / / ~ 1 y
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lw~,~ ~ I lr ~ I 1 II ~ ~ ( i I ~ \ ~ 1 > > ~ 5 I
~ r- 1 I~1 i 1~ ~ I v~y ~ I ~ ~ , ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ~ ~ ~ v ~ I r
~ r\ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 I I I ~ ~
~ \ \ \ ~ 1 ~ 1~ ~ I 1 1 f l ~
\ ~ 1 ~ ~ 11 ~ Itl I II
1 1\ \ ~ ~ I I I I I \ 1 ~1~ t~~11 111 I I i \ CJ 1 ~ ~ r
~ ) 1 1 1 I I 1 1, \ 1. \ ~ 1,~~. ~ 1 t1 I t I 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 11~ I I I ~
~ I 1 ► ~ - \ \ S 1 ~ 1. \ \1 ~ 1 11
1 ~ 1 i ~ ~ ► 1 v 1 t , ~
r , 1 . ~ l 1 ~ c ~ ~ n
I ~ ~ ~ ~ `I ~ ~ I 1~ ~ 1
1 ~ ~ t I ~ 1
1 ~ \ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 l ~ I ( 1 1\~ +1
1 ~ I I ~ 1i_ I I ~ r~
1 I I n
1 If i
I 1 I ~ r,
~ 1 1 I ~ I 1
~ ~ 1 ` ~ ~
ti ~ ,
~ ~
I
t ~r
r
I
~ 1
r k ~ ~i 1
f m m ~
r~ ' I
.1 r,,l i
ji
i ' ; ~
~ v I `
~
~,1
0.. 1223
11GA~' 24-@`~
31~
aR , 3 L III cam} rt
Y X C R rt A ORE AN OIF Tti
iuzwof-
l
I( oll
I
L ~C~NI~
-t, EXISTINGs MANHOLE t STORM SEWER ~ EXISTING ✓AL`✓E t BOX ~
EXISTING INLET t 970RM SEtI~ER NORTH PROPOSED BLOWOFF
PROPOSED MANHOLE t STORM SEWER -x..ys.~ ExISTiNG MAN;-TOLE i SEWER
- PROPOSED INLET t STCRM SEWER S PROPOSED MANHOLE t SEWER
ao o ao ao
EXISTING FIRE Hl'pRANT PR ITA Y T OPOSED SAN R LA ERAL ~W~
1 inch = 40 ft. x-W EXISTING WATER LINE
PROPOSED WATER LINE
f
GG~
5 J~ ,IdJ 5
'I
EXI~TfN6
RE5IDEKGE ~ .U
kw wq
z u~
oem
~ ~ eX o
_ _ S _ _ 5
N - - ti f..
00
~ ~ L °iA.-
~ 0 D X
~ ~
b ~ u
J
' U z L~
~N N ~ti
_ _
-I ~
- - - - - - - - - i ~ to p
-r~ ~ / ~ ~
- M tER . ~ _ 5 ~V
~ . C _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --s z
~"SS• ~ e S ` - VJ
6" W
HYD N
F
LQ C J
wAT~~ a~a~ ~s~( swa~E .
r
D S
0
• . ~ ti~
J f
< 'vtiF _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ,C V'
W~ J LL
^~y
V U
~
S
I -
X
s.u~.~ a5c~~sio~
LEC~END
1 -;r ~ EXIBTMG DEpDUpJO TI~EB TO REMAM N
~+1 n
EXI571NG EXIBiMG EVER'.aI~EN iREEB TO REMAIN ON
RE5IDENGE ~ -
EXIBTMa DEG~DUOU9 TREEB TO BE REMOVED ww ~ Mn./Gn ELt - _ d!
i
EXI9TWG EvE~EN i~ES i0 BE faff'16✓ED
_ ~ JJ
V~ l l
i
J (V r -
.f-
2
4
1
~ ,~9 ~
r i
~t~" w~~ e°~'~ N ~ ~ y O
g,, I p" V~
~~L~ _
----j------- t f
■
P. C. E. E A 5 E M~ N T
i 1 =NEW
1
7
° ~ _~I U, ~ -
.rte -
4 '
BONNET✓ILLE POWER ~4DMINIST~?AI~ION EP~SEMENT
NORTH
y
i
x w w
ba-a aeJ ~rn~~ --'-i
1 inch = ~ ft.