The URL can be used to link to this page

ZCA1998-00007 COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Le9al P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 NOt1Ce TT 914 3 BEAVERTOtJ, OREGON 97075 Legal Notice Advertising • City of Tigard/Planning • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard , Oregon 9 7 2 2 3 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit •Accounts Payahle • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, jss. I, Kathy_Snvder being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Advertising Director, or his principal clerk, of theTicia d- ual a i n Times a newspaper of general ciroulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaic} couniv and state; that the Hearinct-1,urner Annexation a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the - entire issue of said newspaper for QNE successive and consecutive in the following issues: tlav 28,1998 Subscribed and sworn before me this 28th day of D4av, 1998 o aryPublic for Oregon ~ m''~d'" A. s`'=;s'-;S 4 ivGit~E:Y PUi±L:C•JrEGON ~i~ My Commission Expires: CJMfAi581uN slG. 062911 AFFIDAVIT MY COMMISSION_EXPIRES MAY 16, 2001 . • ~ ~ The following wi11 be considered by `the Tigard City Council on JUNE - 9,1998'at17:30 P.M., at the:Tigard Civic Center - Town Hall Room,. ; 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Both public oral and written ' testimony is invited. The public Hearing on this matter will be conducted ' in accordance with the rules of Chapter 18.32 of the Tigard Municipal Code and any rules and procedures adopted by the Tigazd City Council, or rules of procedure set forth in Chapter 18.30. , Failure to raise an issue in person *or by letter at some point prior to the , close-of the hearing on the request accompanied by statements or evidence sufficient to allow the Heanngs Authority arid all the parties to respond on ; ttle request; precludes an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue, and failure to specify the criterion from the Community Development Code or,Comprehensive Plan at which a comment is ~ directed precludes an appeal based on that criterion. Furttier information is . ~ available at City Hall and may be obtained from the Community Develop- i ' ment Director or City Recorder at the':same location, or'by. calling (503) ? 639-4171. . ; .f. , ; PUBLICHEARING:' . : ' - ~ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION [ZCA] 98-0007 - ' TURNER ANNEXATION < . . . . • . The applicant has requested to annex one (1) lot consisting of .11 acres of ; unincorporated Washington Gounty,land into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan' and Zoning Designations4:rom . . Washington County Neighborhood Commercial to City of Tigard Neigh- . borhood Commercial, C-N. CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATI4N:., Washington County Neighbortiood Commercial. RECOMMENDED "ZONING DESIGNATION: It;is recommended that,the City of Tigard. Zoning D'esignation'of Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) be designafed upon annezation as this`designation most.closely conforms to the Coun=' ty's current designation:"LOCATION:The'subject parcel is located nbrth' ~ of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue;:WCTM•1S135AA,(:.r Tax Lot 00400.=APPLICABLE:REVIEW CRITERIA:.Tigazd Com-.i;; ~ prehensive Plan Policies 40.12and 10.1.3; land Tigard,Com- munity.Dev,elopment,Code:Sections,18,136 and 18.138. - 11 . - - u! --i. , yn' e .1 S~C'r :[v' y jo.. 3' _ i~~ : • ~ i. °•fi3' , ~ • ~^a. w ~ : ry ~ "~i', ~ Cf . . . . . ~ . . .A . ~ :j .a ~ 3r x. :~i~l ,ry.• f t . ✓ ,a? ~ i . ~i n • ~ v ~y~ t'~ ~i , 6~ rX• ~ ' 1~ •v6 _ \J~; V~ , 't~r . f ~h ~A.I. • ~ , , • ' • i i ; ~ "yM. ~j "'~''y'N N~"' .f t . . 'i , ~ • ~~V- r , /~1-r-~•.... 9M143 - Publish May 28, 1998. ' .a . 0 0 Return completed questionnaire to: 9/14/98 Center for Population Research and Census POBox751 Portland State University Portland, OR 97207-0751 Please fill in all blanks anii return no later than Sept. 25, 1998 for certification on Sept. 30, 1998. ANN:EXATION QUESTIONNAIRE City of TIGARD County of WASHINGTON Annexation Ordinance NLUnber or Fina1 Order Number 3924 Effective Date of Annexation NOTE: Enumeration of annexations which involve 125 or more housing units must be conducted under the supervision of the Center for Population Research and Census to be certified. Complete the following section if there are less than 125 housing units in this annexation. Atta.ch completed confidential census schedules for all housing units both vacant and occupied. There must be one sheet for each inhabitable housing unit. HOUSING iJNITS AND POPULATION AT TIlVIE OF ANNEXATION TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT PERSONS UNITS IN SINGLE FAMIL,Y STRUCTURES UIVITS 1N MULTIl'LE F.AMII,Y STRUCTURES MOBILE HOMES OR T7tAII,ERS TOTAL POPULATION OF ANNEXED AREA DATE OF ENUMERATION ENUMERATED BY POSITION TELEPHONE NUNMER. This questionnaire and thE; completed census schedules are the only data used to certify annexed population. Please DO NOT send maps, copies of the final ordinance, lists of addresses, etc. to our office unless you are requested to do so. If there are any questions, or to schedule a census, contact Barry Edmonston at the Center for Population Research and Census (503) 725-5101. THANK YOU. . . PORTLALND STATE UNIVERSrrY Annexation Questionnaire Procedure Dear City Official: The Center for. Population Research and Census (CPRC) at Portland State University certifies population annexed to c;ities on a quarterly basis. The quarters end December 31, MarcF, 31, June 30, and September 30. Annexed population is added to the previousIy certified population and these certified suppler.nents are used by the State of Oregon in the quarterly distribution of previously collected revenue. After an annexation has been approved, a notice is filed with the Secretary of State's Office. That ofFice notifies CPRC that an annexation has occurred. The Center then sends the city a Ietter and questionnaire requesting the pertinent population and housing unit data. It is essential that the ciities return the completed questionnaire. For those annexations involving no population or housing units, write "none" across that section of the questionnaire and mail it to CPRC. For annexatioris that do involve housing units and/or population, a confidential sheet must be completed for each housing unit. The confidential sheets are then aitached to the questionnaire and returned to CPRC. Enumeration of annexations that involve 125 or more housing units must be conducted by CPRC. Please contact Barry :Edmonston at (503) 725-5101 if the annexation involves more than 125 housing units. Thank you for your attention and participation. If you have any question;, please call Barry Edmonston at (503) 7215-5101. CENTER FOR POPLILATION RESEARCH AND CENSUS ■ COLLEGE OF URBAN AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 1604 SW IOTH, ROOM 107 • POST OFFICE BOX 751 ■ PORTLAND, OREGON 97207-0751 ■(503) 725-3922 ■ FAX (503) 725-5162 ZC1q9f -o00 7 DOR 34-1304-98 T'• Notice to Taxing Districts Oregon Department of Revenue ORS 308.225 Cartographic Unit . 955 Center St. NE Salem, OR 97310 (503) 945-8297, fax 945-8737 C/ i) eCity of Tigard RECENED PLANNING Description and Map Approved Finance Director September 29,1998 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigazd, OR 97223 OCT 0 2 1998 As Per ORS 308.225 CiTY OF TIGARD Z Descriptiun Z Map received iroin: P.M.B.C. - - On: 9/2/98 This is to notify you that your boundary change in Washington County for ANNEX TO THE CITY C►F TIGARD. WITHDRAW FROM THE WASHINGTON CO. ENHANCED SHERIFF'S PATROL DISTRICT. FINAL ORDER #3924 has been: X Approved 9/29/98 ❑ Disapproved Notes: Department of Revenue File Number: 34-1304-98 Prepared by: Mike Hughe:;, 503 945-8287 Boundary: X Change ❑ Proposed Change ❑ Planned Change The change is for: ❑ Formation of a new district Z Annexation of a territoiy to a district X Withdrawal of a territory from a district ❑ Dissolution of a district: ❑ Transfer ❑ Merge County Assessor copy - Copies to: Taxing District, Department of Revenue, County Commissioners or County Court/Boundary Commission (If appropriate) i ° ~ Z. 463 370 141 Z 463 370 140 ~ C,s Pos~ semce `-us Postal servioe ~ ~ Receipt for Certified Mail ~ Receipt for Certified Mail ~ b No Insurance Coverage Provided. No Insurance Coverage Provided. o not use for Intemational Mail See reverse Do not use for Intemational Mail (See reverse) ~A D ~ Sue Knable or Pat Prouse , NW General Telephone Company ~ Pacific N W Be l l Te lep hone Co. ; P.O. Box 152206 1;~ 450 110th NE, Room 409 ' Irving, TX 75015 ~ Bellevue, WA 98004 ~ I ~ postage $ Postage $ J Certified Fee , ~ I \ ~ Certified Fee Spedal Delivery Fee ; Speaal Delivery Fee Restdcted Delivery Fee ~ Restdcted DeGvery Fee Retum Receipt Showin to ~ Retum Receipt Showing to rn 9 Whom & Date Delive ~ Whom & Date Oeliv 1 O ~ V Retum Receipt S ig So Date, 8 Address , ~ O " O TOTAL Po Fee $ O TOTAL Posift' Fe $ S 1 ~ ~z ap Postmark or 1601d ~ Postrnark o Toz 19~l~~ ~ a ~$~s I a. ~ ~ Z 463 370 144 r5~ ° Z '463 370 149 o Postal Service US Postal Service ` o Receipt for Certified Mail t~ Receipt for Certified Mail ~ No Insurance Coverage Provided. ~ No Insurance Coverage Provided. ~ Do not use for Intemational Mail See reveise C~ Do not use for Intemational Mail See reverse ~ Susan Logan N rTualatin Valley Fire & Rescue ~ Portland General Electric Attn: Joan 121 SW Salmon, 1 WTC-0502 20665 SW Blanton Street ~ Portland, OR 97204 . Aloha, OR 97007 ; Pastage Postage $ ~ Certified Fee .~5 I Certified Fee l• 3~ Speaal Delive Fee ~ ry Special Dalivary Fee I I LO Restdcted Delivery Fee I Lf) Restdcted Delivery Fee ~ rn ~ ~ Retum Receipt Showing to Retum Neceipt Showing to Whom & Date Delivered V Whom & Date Delivered O ReNm Receipt Showin Retum Receipt Sh ' O Date, & Addressee' Date, & Address 0 TOTAL ~ TOTAL Po ees $ € Postrnark o q T"~ 1 YV) Potrnark or 0 1~,~~ 10~9~ w I~ a a U S~S ~ ~ ~~d USY I lz I C1 Z 463 370 143 o N f1S Postal SeNice r--~ Z 463 370 147 D ~ LiS Postal 5ervice Receipt for Certified Mail ~ Recei t for Certified Mail , No Insurance Coverage Provided. ~ P ~ Do not use for Intemational Mail (See reverse) No Insurance Coverage Provided. Do not use for Intemational Mail See reverse ~ Unified Sewerage Agency Admin. , Sen,to Washington County Admin. Bldg. ; Pride Disposal Service, Inc. 150 North First Street PO Box 820 Hillsboro, OR 97124 ~ Tc Sherwood, OR 97140 • ~ Postage j Posta9e $ , \ \ Certified Fee Cerfified Fee , ~ Spedal Delivery Fee I 1 Speaal Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delive Fee ry Retum Receipt Showing to Whom & Date Delive t Retum Receipt Showing to Retum Receipt 14141 Whom & Date Defivered V ~ Date, & Address ' 9 ~ q ~a,,, Re Nm Recei p t S h o ' V • ~ p ~ ; ' , y " Date~ & Addr ~ ~ O TOTAL Post ee $ a.~ ? O < SZ, Postmark or ~O_ TOTALP~" M Postmark rWe C~u ° ~~'`c'~ _ • ~ ~ - (L -----------__~-A_ I Z 463 370 142 ~11" v Z_ 4.63 370 148 ~ - uS Postal Service US Postal Service ~ ~ Receipt for Certified Mai1 n Receipt for Certified Mail No Insurance Coverage Provided. No Insurance Coverage Provided. ~ Do not use for Intemational Mail See reverse -1 Do not use for Intemational Mail See reverse Customer Accounting Department Gary Pippin ~ NW Natural Gas Company ; Tualatin Valley Water District N 222 NW Second Avenue PO Box 745 Portland, OR 97209 ~ F Beaverton, OR 97075 • ~ Postage $ Postage $ Certified Fee Cerfified Fee 3 ~ ~i gpepal Delivery Fee % Speaal Delivery Fee I Restricted Delivery Fee Restrided Delivery Fee Retum Receipt Showing,to 1~ Retum Receipt Showing to YVhom & Date Delivered Whom & Date Delivere 4ietum Receip ReNm Receipt Sho ~ Date, 8 - IDate, & Address ~Q ~ TOTAL e & Fe~~, ^ $ • 0 TOTAL Po Faeg $ '-S V) Postrnark M Postrnark o e ni I d U~ U' ~ ~ a i a . ~ ~ - - - Z~ 463 370 139 ! o~ -Z.463 370 146 , p `.S Postal service ~ - , uS Postal Service ~ R e c e i p t f o r C e rti f i e d M a i l Receipt for Certified Mail ~ No Insurance Coverage Provided. No Insurance Coverage Proyided, Do not use for Intemational Mail (See reverse Do not use for Intemational Mail See reveise S Bruce Crest s~+fo s MACC st Miller's Sanitary Service, Inc. ~ 1815 NW 169th ; PO Box 217 Beaverton, OR 97006 ~ Pc Beaverton, OR 97075-0217 j Postage $ . ~ Postage s . 5a ' Certified Fee Certified Fee ~ Spedal Oelivery Fee SPepai Delivery Fee C~ LO Restricted Delivery Fee Restric(ed Dalivery Fee Retum Heceipt Showing to ( I ao) Retum Receipt Showin to ~ Whom & Date DeGvered 1 WAom $ Date Delivered \~a Retum Receipt Showin9 Retum Receipt •yyhn. \ Q Date, & Addressee's Date, & Addressee' d~tes`sx r.: J 0 TOTAL Postage sIN ~ r' 7 0 TOTAL Po p$ t ~ ^ lz::~, V) Postrnark or Dat P o s t m a r k or 2 ~ LL ~~0 1g~,~,, . o M Jw~ , a a cf ~.0 Z^ 463 37[] 145 lJS Postal Service ' Receipt for Certified Mail ~ No Insurance Coverage Provided. ~ Do not use for Intemational Mail See reverse Rant tn N Schmidt's Sanitary Service, lnc. '8325 SW Ross Street ; iTigard, OR 97223 i Postage $ . ~ ~ Certified Fee Speaal Detivary Fee ~ I ~ Restrided Delivery Fee i Retum Receipt Showing to ~ Whom & Date Qetive 1 1 1~ ~ ~ - Rewm Receipt _ ~ Date, 3 Address ~ 70TAL P Fe s i O Postrnark o i ~ LL ~ ~ a , d SENDER: CFNI'1FRr i~i~.> f., ~~.o~~,o r~,o I also wish to receive th/ € r :2 ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. f0110wif1g S0NIC2S (fOf dn ' y■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. a> ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this extra fee): ~ card to you. ' d Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address ~ v Perrnit. 2. ❑ Restricted Delive d Write 'Retum Receipt Requested° on the mailpiece below the article number. rY N The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date COf1SUlt ostmaster for fee. delivered. P a ' o 0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number ~ ~ z y&3 -370 1,13 m E a 4b. Service Type ~ ~ Unifed Sewerage Agency Admin. Washington County Admin. Bldg. . 0 Re9'Stered ❑ Certified ~ EZZL6 uo6aJp 'pJe6i1 u 150 North First Street ❑ EXpress nnaii ❑ Insured ~ pJ8A9lno8 IIeH MS 5Z l aavsii ao uio Hillsboro, OR 97124 ~ ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ CoD i ouawiN ueinin :Nllb' 7. Date of D ~liv~' uoisinia 6uiuueld 'o pi e6i1 lo Apo 5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested Y I1 i : and fee is paid) 6.1 o • xoq siu, ui apoo d,Z pu~ `ssaappe `auaeu ano~( )uiad ~ y Ps _ j Receipt Ol-J 'oN 3!wJad - - - - - - - - - , ~ SdSfl pied saaJ 19 061331s0d ~iey~ sse~~-~saij 30IA83s lV1SOd S31tJls ~_1\IN(~ d SENDER: I also wish to receive th~ ~ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. y■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. fOllOwift9 services (for a a) ■ Print your name and address on.the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): ' ~ card to you. ai A tta c h t h i s f o r m t o t h e f r o n t o f t h e m a i l p i e c e, o r o n t h e b a c k i f s p a c e d o e s no t 1. ❑ A d d r e s s e e' s A d d r e s s ~ ` permit. ~ ~ Write °Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ ReStrICted Delivery Y■ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date COf1SUlt postmaster for fee. a delivered. 0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number v d m o[ o. 4b. Service Type 3 I E 'Sersan Logan o C3 Registered ❑ Certified ~ 0 Portland General Electric u'i 121 SW SGlmon, 1 WTC-0502 ~ Express Mail ❑ ~nsured y~ ~ ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD o Portland, OR 97204 7. Date of Delivery• o I, 0 5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addre ssee's Address (Only if requested x I' and fee is paid) L h 6. Wre:A re r A nt ~ T ~ i y PS Form 3811, D ember 1994 102595-98!B-0229 Domestic Return Recelpt ~ __C-)00~ I` Z C~ 9~ ODD17 - I D SENDER: I also wish to receive the~ ~ C I~; SENDER: , ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. f;a ■ Com let 1 also wish to receive the( followin services for an I p e items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. f o l l o wi n s ervices for arn. y■ Com pl et e i t e m s 3, 4 a, a n d 4 b. 9 ~ - y■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. 9 ( d■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee : ' ~ card to you. ~ aj y■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this extra fee): > ■ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address ~2 y ~rd to you. v d permit. ~ Aeac,? this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address ■ Write °Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. 2• ❑ Restr'iCted Delivery Um 2. ❑ Restricted Delive d Y■ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date N rite °Return Receipt Requested° on the mailpiece below the article number. ry deiivered. Consult postmaster for fee. o, I Y■ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date N ~ • deiivered. Consult postmaster for fee. a 0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number c°'i I c •d 3~ o ~ 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number ~ a 4b. Service Type ? I a P e Dis~osa l Service, ~IIC. i 4b. ~ ic~ i E Customer Accounting Department E , ~ - ype , o . ❑ Registered ❑ Certified ~ N W Na tura l Gas Company ~ P O Box 820 ~ Regis t s ❑ Certified ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured S d ~ I , O R 97140 ❑ Exp ss 0 1222 N W Secon d Avenue C) ~ ❑ Insure d E , Po rtlan d, 0~ 2 9 7 2 0 9 ~ Retum Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD ` I W ❑ R e t m c ei p t for ~ n dis ❑ C D ~ 7. Da of Delivery = I 7. Dat G ~ o ~ - cA 5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested 5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addr `sge ~ s,~(O ly if requested T and fee is aid ~ 6. Signat e• ssee or gent p) /~i~' and fee ~ aid) L 6. Signat re: (Addressee or gent) ~ T X ~ I'o X 2 Ps Fo 3811, December 1994 102595-98-B-0229 Domestic Return Rece pt ~ y ps Form 3811, o cember 1994 102595-98-a-0229 Domestic Return R ceipt SENDER: I also wish to receive the~ SENDER: t also wish to receive the\l ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. ~ 1 ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. o H■ Complete items 3, aa, and ab. following services (for am■ Complete items 3, 4a, and ab. following services (for an (D ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): y■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): ~card to you. ai ~ card to you. y 4)• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee'S AddfBSS -2 j. Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address 2 d permit. Z( dpermit . Write 'Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. 2• ❑ R2StfICtBd D@liv2ry N Write 'Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. 2• ❑ ReStriCted Delivery' ~ Y■ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date e, Y o The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date ~ deiivered. Consult postmaster for fee. deiivered. Consult postmaster for fee. a 0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number ~ I o 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number ~ '0 4&3 370 139 It , '0 rz -416 3 .376 i7d m a i 4b. Service Type ~ a 4b. Service Type ~ o Bruce Crest ~ £ ~Gary Pippin ` ~ MACC ❑ Registered ❑ Certified ~ Tualatin Valley Water District ~ Registered ❑ Certified ~ N ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured c ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured C' 1815 NW 169th N PO Box 745 ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD ~ ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD ~ Beaverton OR 97006 Beavertan, OR 97075 o ~ 7. Date of Delive' ,~`o o iv ~ ` o ~ TUI ° o _ . eceiv d =(Addressee 8. Addressee's dres ( nly if requested Y ~r fepa ee s Address (Only if requested and fee is paid) ndid) nature: Zorggeno nat se a yeittj" o L T ~ = X 1 0 ~ N ~'d U ~ c-- ~ . J " Ps Form 3811, December 1994 ,azsss-sa-s-ozzs Domestic Return Receipt ~ y Ps Form 3811, Decem 9- Domestic Return Receipt - - ~ - - zG4 9Y ~aa7 i d SENDER: I also wish to rvireceive th~ r I~ SENDER: I also wish to receive thc~ e Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. seces for an ■ Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. fl9 SBrvIC2S (fOf 811 y• Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. f011owin9 ~ ~n ■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. fOIIOWl y■ Print your name and address on the reverse ot this form so that we can return this extra fee): ~ I d■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can retum this extra fee): card to you. l y 1 ~ ~ . ■ Attach this form to the front of the mail iece, or on the back if s ace does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address card to you ~ P P I~■ Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address '•Z d d pe"nit. 2. ❑ Restricted Delive d d PefR"t• 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery ■ Write 'Return Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. ry N Write 'Retum Receipt Requested' on the mailpiece below the article number. fA Y■ The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. COf1SUlt Postmaster for fee. Q I M■ The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date Consult postmaster for fee. a delivered. y 0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number 0~ 0 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number d m 9 Z ~63 ~ 70 I y.~ ~ y~ 3 ~ 70116 4b. Service Type ~ 4b. Service Type ~ £ SchmidYs Sanitary Service, Inc. a Millers Sanitary Service, Inc. ❑ Re istered ❑ Certified E ❑ Re istered ❑ Certified ~ ~ ~ 8325 SW Ross Street g ~ 1 PO Box 217 g TlgBfd, OR 97223 ❑ Express Mail ❑ Insured N N i Express Mail ❑ Insured ~ Beaverton, OR 97075-0217 ❑ Return Receiptfor Merohandise ❑ COD ❑ Return Receiptfor Merchandise ❑ COD ~ LLJ ~ o i p 7. Date of Iivery Q , 7. Date of elivery - ► ~ , ~ 0 - IT, - ~ 5. Received By: (Print Name) < 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested 5. Received By: (Print Name) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested ~ _ cc ~ and fee is paid) L n and fee is paid) F- J ~ 6.S ~ ~ I 6.1 o y Psl IReceipt y P; I Receipt ZGr7-- Dro ~ - - ~ ! c; SENDER: I also wish to receive th~ ~ ! Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. following serviCes (for an I H■ Complete items 3, 4a, and 4b. a) ■ Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this extra fee): ~ card to you. ~ e Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space does not 1. ❑ Addressee's Address 1 y permiL ~ I Write "Return Receipt Requested°on the mailpiece below the article number. 2• ❑ RestriCted Delivery The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date N Consult ostmaster for fee. " ` delivered. P a f 0 3. ARicle Addressed to: 4a. Article Number ~ 7D :E Sue Knable or Pat Prouse 4b. Service Type ~ ~ r ° Pacific NW Bell Telephone Co. 0 Re9'Stered ❑ Certified cr M . cn 450 110th NE, Room 409 ❑ Express nnail ❑ Insured Bellevue, WA 98004 1 0 Retum Receipt for Merchandise ❑ COD 7. Date of Delivery 2 ; ~ Y o 5. Receiv By (Print ame)4 K. Ad ressee's Address (On/y if requested Y M C~ ~ ; IC and fee is paid) t 6. Signat re: (A esse orAgent) I-- I X ~ ~ 2 Ps Form 381 , December 1994 102595-98-s-0229 Domestic Return Receipt ~ I-~---A CITY OF TIGARD , Community Development Skaping A Better Community CITY OF TIGARD Waskington County, Oregon NOTICE OF FINAL ORDER BYTNETIGARD CITY COUNCIL case Number(s): ZONE CNANGE AHNEIIATION QCA] 98-0001 Case Name(s): TURNER ANNEIIATION Name of Owner: Steve Tumer Name of Applicant: (Same as Owner) Address of Applicant: 2015 SW Kanan Street Citv: Portland State• Oreqon Zip• 97201 Address of Property: The proqertv is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. Tax Map & Lot No(s).: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. Reauest: ➢ The applicant has requested annexation of .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and to adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. The Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 9, 1998, on the matter. Consensus was for approval of the Annexation as requested. Zone: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighbofiood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Actlon: ➢ 19 Approval as Requested ❑ Approval with Conditions ❑ Denial Notlce: Notice was published in the newspaper, posted at City Hall and mailed to: 0 Owners of Record within the Required Distance 0 Affected Governmental Agencies 0 The Affected Citizen Involvement Team Facilitator 19 The Applicant and Owner(s) Anal Decisioo: % Or 6,; n r_n cp N o, 6[b. iLo FTHE DECISION WAS SIGNED ON ,~me q,1998 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON J~ ,1998. The adopted findings of fact, decision and statement of conditions can be obtained from the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon. , Appeal: A review of this decision may be obtained by filing a notice of intent with the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) according to their procedures. Questlons: If you have any questions, please call the City of Tigard Planning Division or the City Recorder at (503) 639-4171. ZCA 98-0007 TURNER ANNEXATION NOTICE OF FINAL OROER BY THE CI7Y COUNCIL (COVER SHEEn / ZCA 98-0007 NOTICE OF FINAL nRDER BY CITY COUNCIL •EVr~,. • Y Vl~'CJl T ' Steve Turner 2015 SW Kanan Street Portland, OR 97201 i' IITY OF TIGARD, OREGON • ORDINANCE NO. 98-1 <.o AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0007-TURNER ANNEXATION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public heazing on June 9, 1998 to consider a zoning designation for one (1) parcel consisting of .l 1 acres located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; and WHEREAS, on June 9, 1998 the Tigard City Council approved a Resolution to forward the proposed annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by Planning Staff, as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below, is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use designation of Neighborhood Commercial while implementing the City of Tigard's existing Comprehensive Plan Designation of Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected properties shall be designated as follows: Tax Map/Lot Numbers 1 S 135AA, Tax Lot 00400 Current Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning Wa. Co. Neighborhood Commercial New Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By u{'1j~C/Li n'1,C4S vote of all C uncil members present after being read by number and title only, this day of ,c, , 1998. herine Wheatley, City ecord APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this da f LL , 1998. J .11 J PsNiiocli, Mayor App~ ved as to form• , Ci Atto ey ~ Date ORDINANCE NO. 98- i:\citywide\ord\zca98-07.ord Page 1 of I Julia P H 21-May-98 3:22 PM I . Agenda Item: ! Hearing Date: June 9,1998 7:30 PM a qp ~s 7 . : . . STAFF REPORT fT~O ~THE ~ . , oF noaR~~: CITY COUNCIL' cm _ . . ~ FORTNE~'CITY~aOFTIGARD,1.OREGOH ~~ty. 7, .a:SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: TURNER ANNEXATION Zone Change Annexation ZCA 98-0007 PROPOSAL: To annex one (1) lot consisting of .11 acres of un-incorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial to City of Tigard Neighbofiood Commercial, C-N. APPLICANT: Steven Tumer OWNERS: Various Owners 2015 SW Kanan Street (List Available Portland, OR 97201 Upon Request) CURRENT ZONING . DESIGNATION: Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. RECOMMENDED ZONING DESIGNATION: It is recommended that the City of Tigard Zoning Designation of Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) be designated upon annexation as this designation most closely conforms to the County's current designation. LOCATION: The subject parcel is located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Sections 18.136 and 18.138. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council find that the.proposedannexation will nofadversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the Ci.ty.. Therefore;~staff,recommends::. ; APPROVAL of the annexation by.:adoption of. the attached Resolution; and. Ordinan' ce • ~ ta,~.,...x.a_ STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE t OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 • TURNER ANNEXATION 6/9/98 PUBUC HEARING ~ i " SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION . Site History: The property is currently vacant. The owner of the lot wishes to annex in order to develop the property and receive city services. No development proposal has been formally proposed, nor has the applicant scheduled a pre-application meeting. Vicinity Information: The area to be annexed is .11 acres. The existing city boundary runs along the southem portion of this property, along SW Locust Street. The site and the property to the north, east and west are within Tigard's Area of Interest but outside of the Tigard city limits. The properties to the north, east and west are outside city limits and zoned Neighbofiood Commercial (C-N) and the property to the south is inside the city limits and zoned R-12. Site Information and Proposal Description: The proposal is to annex into the City of Tigard in order to develop the property and obtain City services. The applicant has requested that the .11 acre site be annexed into the City of Tigard by means of the double-majority method. Representing the owners of more than half of the land (100%) and a majority of the registered electors (100%) of the area proposed to be annexed, the applicant has initiated this action through the written consent of the property owner. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant policies of the Comprehensive Plan based an the following findings: Policy 2.1.1: This Policy requires an ongoing citizen involvement program and is satisfied because the East CIT and surrounding property owners have been notified of the public hearing and notice of the hearing has been published in a newspaper of general circulation. Policy 10.1.1: This Policy requires adequate service capacity delivery to annexed parcels and is satisfied because the City of Tigard Police, Engineering and Water Departments, Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) and Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (TVF&R) have all reviewed the annexation request and have offered no objections. STAFF REPOFT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 OF 4 ZCA 98•0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 6!9l98 PUBLIC HEAR{NG . • • Policv 10.1.2: This Policy pertains to boundary criteria for annexations and is satisfied. The property is adjacent to property on the south that is inside the Tigard city limits. The affected land is Iocated within the City's Urban Services Area (Area of Interest) and is contiguous to the city boundary. Adequate services are also available to accommodate the properties. The Police Department has been notified of this request and has no objections, however, they have requested that all properties east and west of the property be offered the option to annex in efforts to provide consistency in addressing and to reduce confusion to emergency service providers. Staff has sent letters to the property owners directly east and west of the site. If they wish to annex, the attached City Council Ordinance and Resolution can be amended accordingly. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based on the following findings: Section 18.136.030: This Section addresses approval standards for annexation proposals and is satisfied because: The applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Community Development Code provisions have been reviewed and satisfied as previously indicated in this report. The City of Tigard zoning designation of Neighborhood Commercial most closely conforms to the County designation of the same classification. This also satisfies Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.1.3. The determination that the affected property is an established area is based on the standards set forth in Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Community Development Code and OAR 660-007-0005. Section 18.138: This Section provides standards for the classification of annexed land and is satisfied because: . The affected property meets the definition of an established area and shall be designated as such. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering, Public Works, Police and Water Departments have all reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 3 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 6/9/98 PUBLIC HEARING • • • SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Metro Area Boundary Commission, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, Unified Sewerage Agency, Columbia Cable, Metro Area Communications, TCI, Tualatin Valley Water District, PGE, NW Natural Gas, US West Communications, GTE, and Washington County have had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no objections. BASED.ON THE FINDINGS INDICA,T;ED`,ABOVE, P.;L:A,NNINC-STAFF;.:::,. : RECOMMENDS AP.PROVAL OF~,ZONE CHANGE,ANNEXATION ; , ' • . ° ZCA)li~98_ 0007 TURNER"ANNEXATION2c!~ ...1, ~ . dAl Ma 21 199 v 8 PREPARED BY~: Julia Powell Vajduk DATE Associate Planner 4', Mav 21. 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewepdo-iff DATE Planning Manager i:\curplnvulia\annex\zca98-07.doc STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 6!9/98 PUBLIC HEARING • ~ • • • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 98-30 A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED "EXHIBIT A" AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN "EXHIBIT B" WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 9, 1998 to consider the annexation of one tax lot consisting of . l 1 acres located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under Boundary Commission Law ORS 199.410 to 199.519; and ' WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B) to initiate an annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent from owners of more than half of the land in the temtory proposed to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the property which currently lies within the boundary of the Washington Counry Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District, Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District, Washington County Street Lighting District #1 and the Washington County Vector Control District would, by operation of ORS 199.510, be automatically and immediately withdrawn from those districts upon completion of the annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL THAT: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council, pursuant to ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B), hereby initiates proceedings for annexation into the City of Tigard, the territory described in the attached "Exhibit A" and further illustrated in "Exhibit B". SECTION 2: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of the Resolution with the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Bound ommission at once. PASSED: This day of ± ary , 1998. M - City of Tigard ATTEST: OGWL City Recorder - City of Tigard Date RESOLUTION NO. 98-_W i:kitywide\res\zca98-07.res Page 1 of 1 Julia P H 21-May-98 3:22 PM . ~ ~ Exx~~ r.. r ~.+~r r r ZCA 98-0007 'Curner Annexation Legal Description: A tract oF land situated in the NE1/4 ot the NE `l4 of Section 35, Township 1South, Range 1 West, ot the Willamette yteridian. in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Be~inning at a point S89°30'W 60 ft from the Initial point of the TOWN OF vtETZGER as recorded in the records ot Washington County; chence South 82.25 feet to the North right of way line of SW Locust Street; thence S89 °30' W 31.10 ft; thence NO°21' W 10.00 ft; thence S89 °36' W47.59 ft; thence along a 1885.1 ft radius, non-tangen[ curve to the left (chord bears N24° > j' 54" E, 79.77 ft) a distance of 79.78 ft; thence N89°30' E 43.36 ft to the point of beginning. . CITY O[001111PNIG INf011YAilOM S1OT961 sT CQ►~ - VtCtN11Y MAP C" ~ °z SUBJECT O~, o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ~ ° PARCEL TO ~ ~`ic L BE ANNEXE sr F ZCA 98"0007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~tW: Turner Annexation ? x; W ljJ ~ LOCiUST ~ ~3. Z t f.;. ,w' ~ ~ C i 1 C' • ; \ ~;t tµ~~S-:Y • l lK~ ~f A^i ~}x~f ~ Y. :'~~~~~i.. dr R'~,i~'F `1 af{ a f s t . ~ .:r"d• . t , 4 r ~~Y'C!t ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ ~ ,J~. ~~j c ~ ~ ° ST t @C . rt.Y :1`~~`t`~J\~ fi .~.q kay.~VC• . .z i~+3~~~~~'~'~h.~y~ ~ hui~• - MAPLELEAF ` ~ ` 7. ~ e f ~t~ * 2 ~ ;jy . . . - . v~ OD J. p ~ f ~ r . . . ~ • . . _ ~ ~S > ~ r•. 1 t s ~ . v~ s ~ ~C ~Ct ~W „ t a t. +t k, ~t ~ ~i:r : ~ ~ k~~a'~ : ~ ~ t ' 1 Ma~ fi ~ ~ . ~t ~ ~ lr~xtt s i ~~x•- S V . ' ::k M::.' ~ } `i~ y ~i '2 yy~ • . ~gF+~t~~i A 0 100 200 300 400 500 FeN t >t ~A, . Z - ( ~ ~ s ~ •3` si e i! ; ~ 3 i `~3z~ n t•- 77etW-~ . r.l Y ~ ij:: . ~ . ' ; •:~,av.; - :~:,`+_:'•i «'~M ~v=;;...\. ` . 2 t~ 3~' , c?~ 1~~r~' ? ' ° •t ~ \ f ~s :j~c~,v~ ~i,,. ~.~~X:.-~: , ~•..t.a: Y ' 'i~ : :GV~~ J.t+.! _ ~ r: .~~r:, y'~p•~ ~ ~,t~ o~y~:` ,~:1•r ~:g'4t'° ' _ ' - . ' S'~`O '[Z ` ' . . . • ' , CIt'Of~TIg8f(~ :F;Z`~ - ~y7 <•l:,i:` _ I~.fii ii~. ::j ,T:4 ~ _ t: 3ry• :.r'': 'f..: ~ i!~~~ ~r_~•. - ~:i'rY. ~~1: Z?';i~ - ti:, .i ii t;'~it; ~ :o;• :r:~' '.i;:. Mortna6onmWsmpbfa beaUan ud : S . • . ~~:e ~l^: ; O101M be VMUW MAQI ft DlYlOpfIMrr $wVk1! aWi1011. W25 .S1NHd81V'a . . SRRUCE TlpM. oa 97223 . ; _ . . • . . : . ~ : ~ . ~ • ; . : ~ (503)63941?1 ~ - - r ~'lMrww.d.57W.ar.w eo.~cY beve~wmnc - - - ~ - noc w~c wy a issa: evuji.+cko~ipt ~ • . e AFFiDAV1T OF MAIUNG STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) City of Tigard } V-e, S S i CG- ~ pM C 2 hereby csrtsfy: Please Print That l am a ~ for the City of Tigard, Oregon. That I sen,ed notics of the Tigard City Councii K) 0+1 ft- D'~- F-10Gt ~ (SrA.Qr (Z CA-. q ~-D0-7 TLc*-aew- A-YirWka~ 147 . of which the attached is a copy (Marked Exhbit A) upon each of the following named 7h persons on the ~ day of U(,(.4.t . 19 _ 9 by m2,iting to each of them at the address shown on the attached I'ist (Marked Exhibit B), said notica is hereto attached, and deposrted in the United States Maii on the day of (JLtY7 e- 19 ~ 0. postage prepaid. repared Notice Subscribed and sworn to before me this%;&t~ day of _ 19 OFFICIAL SEAL M JO AtdN HAYES NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON Notary Pu i of Oregcn ' COMMISSION NO. 042148 My Cammission Expires: LT4~ MY 6~M1v91S$ION EXPIRES MAY 05, 1999 h: \IcSin\cathy\afofmaii • • • CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 9830 A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED "EXHIBIT A" AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN "EXHIBIT B" WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 9, 1998 to consider the annexation of one (1) tax lot consisting of . I 1 acres located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under Boundary Commission Law ORS 199.410 to 199.519; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B) to initiate an annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent from owners of more than half of the land in the territory proposed to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the property which currently lies within the boundary of the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District, Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District, Washington County Street Lighting District #1 and the Washington County Vector Control District would, by operation of ORS 199.510, be automatically and immediately withdrawn from those districts upon completion of the annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL THAT: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council, pursuant to ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B), hereby initiates proceedings for annexation into the City of Tigard, the territory described in the attached "Exhibit A" and further illustrated in "Exhibit B". SECTION 2: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of the Resolution with the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary ommission at once. f PASSED: This `7 L'41 day of 1998. M - City of Tigard ATTEST: Certified to be a Trve Copy of LC'~~( y1.2 Original on file ? ~~1G~:~'I G~ NAI,L City Rccorder - City of Tigard By: ~L-^ 0? Cifiy Recorder - City of Tigard Date Date: RESOLUTION NO. 98-~,Q iAcitywide\res\zca98-07.res Page 1 of 1 Julia P H 21-May-98 322 PM ExxzB IT A ZCA 98--0007 'furner Annexation Legal Description: A tract oF land situated in the NE of the NE 'f4 oF Section 35, Township 1 South, Ran-ge 1 West, ot'the Willamette vieridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, more parcicularly described as follows: 'Bebinning at a point S89°30'W 60 ft from the Initial point of the TOWN OF METZGER as recorded in the records ot Washington Counry; thence South 32.25 Feet to the North rilo;ht ot way line of SW Locust Street; thence S89'30'W 31.10 ft; thence N0021'W 10.00 fr; thence S89 °36' W47.59 ft; thence along a 1885.1 tt radius, non-tangent curve to the left (chord bears N240 5 J'54" E, 79.77 ft) a distance of 79.73 ft; thence N89030'E 48.36 ft to the point of beginning. . . . , i~,~.i ::>5•:.~:.,: • . . . _ . . . • ' . ..y . . . , . : . . : : : • ~ A~ . , . . ~ , . . ' ♦~.:'.'y.•..;, .,y' ....~-~.._•J~y~':..... ,..Tn'. .~h . . . 7R'.. r4~ (r.•. :x:: :a:~ e F~s!'s., ~ . :t::~.N~- ~rKraa, - •.xn~ viC1-~wn+ai ~^fa4Ti+ •:r•:.`t~ y:~.✓ an,~ . . ~ dP'b'.~:~i.,;'tv::•; :i' r'sn: :^yQ§.~''~J .'~!r; ~6.Z;. F-~•- ~a~;•: ~ :j- ~<`ai~lki~s::::c; 4 I . ,;Nl~ t. a t.~ . • 4 M/ ~ x'Y.. 3'~k' K. ~ Sw v ri y . j , • 92ND f... ~ I.l.... : ' ~ +V :T.I~ • ?.m~v r .'!.n. J'i... .iF.. a .~:~0.'~'w. ,M .`G~•. :~a~~::•'. .'S"., '.~~.9•..~.:.~.4.. ~"~~,',".;":~n. • ~u ::Y :'swdl;: F n y . . . µ M~d'!A.7',~F ."r. f v ~ : > ~a~ • q . : ~ '~u„y~^':.' ,c:~•d~ ; ' ' - . ~ . , ' .4' . :~t~ 'N~ .t K . . y .r lnI at{Qa !y' ~ ~ tr Zt Q ~ y ~ :l M 4YF r ) .Vx . '..1. YNa ~ C . ' i . ~ r 'y4s. .y,% a ~ n `Q~ , • . . , I . , . ; ~ . . : `~4` ' Y' ' • .n. . `:•r ~,~~G.~ f~'-" ~ • Y3 Y. : soni ~ 4r ' vn59 rt . r ( . . i,!"~•,,,~, r.•;. ta~' i ~ ' . ' `'•a,'. ~ ~ ~ . ; 4 ~ I • . } ~ de::. ' ~TM ~,s#' , ~ n ~ ~ S~. :~.y ; r nN jX s r+~ n ~ ~ ~ ` ~~~y., t ~ . ~,d.wb~+'r,A..~ ~Y~ dG+i~. C6' ,:e~ ~x~.y?.'~t s .r~'~or . b• f~ ~ . ~'~ec ~wL ~'"....F ~'?wsz`1~ct. yv^7+~~`S„`.o9c~w A{.c.~ N;t; • i . . ,r ~f ` ~,v*~, i- ^:iA~iw - 2',. -v^w , i ~ ' y. . A1• . w,.., 2's.' . F.e + i . 7 : . ,,,i: . ' °°i^ '~t , ~ C "s' ~✓JC-': f ~ i :i/C"ttij~.Y,i:G~.:: 'n ~ '`4i.., . , . y ~-~y ' ~ :'!i'i:::~qy.° i~,C .L,t"' iAW r,•~ _ r,.-,.;•a:; . ;y :;~;F~ ~;a•:s. . 9 85TH AVE lc: m r c ~ AVE 82ND T I ° ^ ~ 11 11 a , A ~g 8 e 11 n 11 ° Lc~~~~~~ „ z► 11 ~ 11 Z; 00 1 1 ~ o ~ • PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION. 800 NE OREGON ST #16 (STE 540), PORTLAND OR 97232-TEL: 731-4093 FINAL ORDER RE: BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL NO: 3924 - Annexation of territory to the City of Tigard. Proceedings on Proposal No. 3924 commenced upon receipt by the Boundary Commission of a petition of property owners/registered voters and resolution from the Tigard City Council on June 26, 1998, requesting that certain property be annexed to the City. The petitions and resolution meet the requirements for initiating a proposal set forth in ORS 199.490, particularly Section (2)(a) lB). Upon receipt of the petition the Boundary Commission published and posted notice of the public hearing in accordance with ORS 199.463 and conducted a public hearing on the proposal on August 20, 1998. The Commission also caused a study to be made on this proposal which considered economic, demographic and sociological trends and projections and physical development of the land. The Commission reviewed this proposal in light of the following statutory guidance: "199.410 Policy. (1) The Legislative Assembly finds that: "!a> A fragmented approach has developed to public services provided by local government. Fragmentation results in duplications in services, unequal tax bases and resistance to cooperation and is a barrier to planning implementation. Such an approach has limited the orderly development and growth of Oregon's urban areas to the detriment of the citizens of this state. "(b) The programs and growth of each unit of local government affect not only that particular unit but also activities and programs of a variety of other units within each urban area. "(c) As local programs become increasingly intergovernmental, the state has a responsibility to insure orderly determination and adjustment of local government boundaries to best meet the needs of the people. "(d) Local comprehensive plans define local land uses but may not specify which units of local government are to provide public services when those services are required. "(e) Urban population densities and intensive development require a broad spectrum and high level of community services and controls. When areas become urbanized and require the full range of community services, priorities are required regarding the type and levels of services that the residents need and desire. Community service priorities need to be established by weighing the total service needs against the total financial resources available for securing services. Those service priorities are required to reflect local circumstances, conditions and limited financial resources. A single governmental agency, rather than several governmental agencies is Final Order - Page 1 , , ' • • in most cases better able to assess the financiai resources and therefore is the best mechanism for establishing community service priorities. "(2) It is the intent of the Legislative Assembly that each boundary commission establish policies and exercise its powers under this chapter in order to create a governmental structure that promotes efficiency and economy in providing the widest range of necessary services in a manner that encourages and provides planned, well- ordered and efficient development patterns. "(3) The purposes of ORS 199.410 to 199.534 are to: "(a) Provide a method for guiding the creation and growth of cities and special service districts in Oregon in order to prevent illogical extensions of local government boundaries and to encourage the reorganization of overlapping governmental agencies; "(b) Assure adequate quality and quantity of public services and the financial integrity of each unit of local government; "(c) Provide an impartial forum for the resolution of local government jurisdictional questions; "(d) Provide that boundary determinations are consistent with acknowledged local comprehensive plans and are in conformance with state-wide planning goals. In making boundary determinations the commission shall first consider the acknowledged comprehensive plan for consistency of its action. Only when the acknowledged local comprehensive plan provides inadequate policy direction shall the commission consider the statewide planning goals. The commission shall consider the timing, phasing and availability of services in making a boundary determination; and "(e) Reduce the fragmented approach to service delivery by encouraging single agency service delivery over service delivery by several agencies. " 199.462 Standards for review of changes; territory which may not be included in certain changes. (1) In order to carry out the purposes described by ORS 199.410 when reviewing a petition for a boundary change or application under ORS 199.464, a boundary commission shall consider local comprehensive planning for the area, economic, demographic and sociological trends and projections pertinent to the proposal, past and prospective physical development of tand that would directly or indirectly be affected by the proposed boundary change or application under ORS 199.464 and the goals adopted under ORS 197.225." "(2) Subject to any provision to the contrary in the principal Act of the affected district or city and subject to the process of transfer of territory: "(a) Territory within a city may not be included within or annexed to a district without the consent of the city council; "(b) Territory within a city may not be included within or annexed to another city; and Final Order - Page 2 . , ' • • "(c) Territory within a district may not be included within or annexed to another district subject to the same principal Act." The Commission also considered its policies adopted under Administrative Procedures Act (specifically 193-05-000 to 193-05-015), historical trends of boundary commission operations and decisions and past direct and indirect instructions of the State Legislature in arriving at its decision. FINDINGS (See Findings in Exhibit "A" attached hereto). REASONS FOR DECISION (See Reasons for Decision in Exhibit "A" attached hereto.) ORDER On the basis of the Findings and Reasons for Decision listed in Exhibit "A", the Boundary Commission approved Boundary Change Proposal No. 3924 on August 20, 1998. NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED THAT the territory described in Exhibit "B" and depicted on the attached map, be annexed to the City of Tigard as of the date of approval. PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION DATE: BY: Chair ATTEST: Final Order - Page 3 . , ' • 0 Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 FINDINGS Based on the study and the public hearing, the Commission found: 1. The territory to be annexed contains .11 acres, is vacant and is evaluated at $25,000. 2. The owners desire city services to facilitate development. They propose to develop the site into a small (1500 square feet) office building. 3. The Boundary Commission has three adopted policies. The first of these policies states that the Commission generally sees cities as the primary providers of urban services. Recognizing that growth of cities may cause financial problems for the districts, the Commission states in the second policy that the Commission will help find solutions to the problems. The third policy states that the Commission may approve illogical boundaries in the short term if these lead to logical service arrangements in the long term. 4. The territory is within the regional Urban Growth Boundary and the boundary of Metro. 5. Policy 15 of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan states the County's "Roles And Responsibilities" relative to Urbanization: It is the policy of Washington County to work with service providers, including cities and special districis, and the Portland Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission, to insure that facilities and services required for growth will be provided when needed by the agency or agencies best able to do so in a cost effective and efficient manner. The County Community Plan consists of a plan map and plan text which includes identifi- cation of general design elements, specific design elements and areas of special concern. The County community plan for this area is the Metzger-Progress Community Plan. This Community Plan identifies the territory to be annexed as NC, Neighborhood Commercial. This designation "permits smaller scale commercial facilities which are generally oriented towards serving the surrounding neighborhood area." The General Design Elements of the Metzger-Progress Community Plan include such items as encouragement of the protection of significant trees, retention of open space, preservation of older sound housing stock where feasible, etc.. The last general design element (No. 22) states: Piecemeal annexation of land in this Planning Area shall be discouraged because it damages the character of the Metzger community. If annexation is to occur, then annexation as a community unit is preferred. (NOTE: It should be noted that several large scale and a number single lot annexations in the Metzger area have occurred since this general preference was placed in Final Order - Page 4 . • ' • • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 the Plan. Also more specific conditions for annexation are laid out in the UPAA and the City's Comprehensive Plan-see below.) 6. The City of Tigard and Washington County have entered into an Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) which is a part of both the County's and Tigard's adopted Comprehensive Plans. The UPAA sets out an "Active Planning Area" within which the City assumes responsibility for land use planning, and an "Area of Interest" in which the County agrees to coordinate its planning because of the potential impacts on Tigard. This proposal falls within the "Area of Interest" as designated in the UPAA. The following pertinent provisions are from Section B, "Area of Interest" portion of the UPAA: A. Area of Interest 1. Definition Area of Interest or Primarv Area of Interest means unincorporated lands contiguous to the Active Planning Area in which the CITY does not conduct comprehensive planning but in which the CITY does maintain an interest in comprehensive planning and development actions by the COUNTY because of potential impacts on the CITY Active Planning Area.... 2. The COUNTY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning and develop- ment actions within the Area of Interest. 3. The COUNTY is responsible for the preparation, adoption and amendment of the public facility plan required by OAR 660-1 1 within the Area of Interest. 4. The CITY may consider requests for annexations in the Area of Interest subject to the following: a. The C►TY shall not require anriexation of lands in the Area of Interest as a condition to the provision of urban services for development. b. Annexations by the CITY within the Area of Interest shall not create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete the island annexation. c. The CITY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other representative means for annexation in the Metzger/Progress Community Planning Area, which includes Washington Square, within the CITY Area of Interest. Not contrary to the foregoing, the CITY reserves all of its rights to annex and acknowledges the rights of individual proper[y owners to annex to the CITY pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes. d. Upon annexation of land within the Area of Interest to the CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations to CITY plan designations which most closely approximate the density, use provi- sions and standards of COUNTY designations. Furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this designation for one year after the effective date of annexation unless both the CITY and the COUNTY Planning Final Order - Page 5 . , ' • • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 Directors agree at the time of annexation that the COUNTY designa- tion is outdated and an amendment may be initiated before -the one year period is over. 7. Washington County reviewed its role in service provision in its Countv 2000 program. This program essentially lays out a Iong range strategic and fiscal plan for the County. In this document, the County adopted a policy of supporting a service delivery system which distinguishes between municipal and county-wide services to achieve tax fairness and expenditure equity in the provision of public services. The County policy states that municipal services should be provided either by cities or special districts. 8. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan consists of the Resource Document (Volume I) and the Findings, Policies & Imqlementation StrateQies (Volume II). The Tigard Community Development Code and the Washington County-Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement should also be considered a part of the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Tigard has a"city limits" plan. The County's plan and ordinances remain r, applicable unless the City takes other action after the annexation is effective. The following policies from Volume II of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan appear to be relevant to this proposal: Policy 7.1.1 THE CITY SHALL: a. Prepare and implement a capital improvements program in conjunction with Washington County and the applicable service districts; b. Work with the service districts to provide a coordinated system for providing services; c. Provide urban services in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan to the extent of the City's financial resources; d. Use the Capital Improvements Program as a means for providing for orderly growth and the efficient use of tand; e. Develop a Comprehensive Plan with consideration being given to the level and capacity of the existing services; and f. Adopt locational criteria as the basis for making decisions about the property location for public facilities. POLICY 7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REd.UIRE AS A PRE-CONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: Final Order - Page 6 . ' ' • • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the City unless the property involved is over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The Facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to City standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. PoliCy 10.1.1 PRIOR TO THE ANNEXATION OF LAND TO THE CITY OF TIGARD: a. The city shall review each of the following services as to adequate capacity, or such services to be made available, to serve the parcel if developed to the most intense use allowed, and will not significantly reduce the level of services available to developed and undeveloped land within the City of Tigard. The services are: 1. water; 2. sewer; 3. drainage; 4. streets; 5. police; and 6. fire protection. b. If required by an adopted capital improvements program ordinance, the applicant shall sign and record with Washington County a nonremonstrance agreement regarding the following: 1. The formation of a local improvement district (L.I.D.) for any of the following services that could be provided through such a district. The extension or improvement of the following: a) water; b) sewer; c) drainage; and d) streets. 2. The formation of a special district for any of the above services or the inclusion of the property into a special district for any of the above services. Final Order - Page 7 . ' ' • • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 c. The City shall provide urban services to areas within the Tigard urban planning area or within the urban.growth boundary upon annexation. • Policy 10.1.2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS OF LAND BY THE CITY SHALL BE BASED ON FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING: a. The annexation eliminates an existing "pocket" or "island" of unincorporated territory; or b. The annexation will not create an irregular boundary that makes it difficult for the police in an emergency situation to determine whether the parcel is within or outside the city; c. The police department has commented upon the annexation; d. The land is located within the Tigard urban planning area and is contiguous to the city boundary; e. The annexation can be accommodated by the services listed in 10.1.1(a). Policy 10.1.3 UPON ANNEXATION OF LAND INTO THE CITY WHICH CARRIES A WASHINGTON COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATION, THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSIGN THE CITY OF TIGARD ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION WHICH MOST CLOSELY CONFORMS TO THE COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATION. Policy 10.2.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF CITY OR UNIFIED SEWERAGE (USA) LINES EXCEPT: a. Where applications for annexation for those properties have been submitted to the City; or b. Where a nonremonstrance agreement to annex those properties has been signed and recorded with Washington County and submitted to the City; or c. Where the applicable state or county health agency has declared that there is a potential or imminent health hazard. The pertinent Tigard Community Development Code sections appear to be Chapters 18.136, Annex- ations; and 18.138, Established/Developing Area Classification. Chapter 18.136 contains approval standards for the City Council when reviewing a proposed annexation prior to submission to the Boundary Commission. These standards are: A. The decision to approve, approve with modification, or deny an application to annex property to the City shall be based on the following criteria: 1. All services and facilities are available to the area and have sufficient capacity to provide service for the proposed annexation area; and Final Order - Page 8 0 . Exhibit A Proposai No. 3924 2. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and implementing ordinance provi- sion have been satisfied.. ' B. The plan designation and the zoning designation placed on the property shall be the City's zoning district which most closely implements the City's or County's compre- hensive plan map designation. C. The determination of whether the property is an established area or a developing area will be based on the standards contained in Chapter 18.138. Chapter 138 provides standards for classifying all lands annexed to the City as either Established Area (unbuildable or essentially built-out) or Developing Area (buildable). The code requires that one of these two designations be applied to all land at the time of annexation. The City Council conducted a public hearing on the annexation and approved the annexation on June 9, 1998. 9. There is an 8-inch City sewer located in SW Locust St. along the south edge of the territory to be annexed. The territory is within the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County as is the City. The Unified Sewerage Agency has a standard agreement between the Agency and the large cities within the Agency (Beaverton, Cornelius, Forest Grove, Hillsboro, Tigard, Tualatin and Sherwood). In that agreement the Cities agree to: 1) comply with the Agency's construction and maintenance standards for sanitary and storm water sewer facilities, 2) follow and accomplish the Agency's work program for storm and surface water, 3) obtain the Agency's consent before issuing construction permits within wetlands, floodways and floodplains. The agreement provides that the city owns and is responsible for sanitary sewer lines under 24 inches in diameter within the City limits and for storm water facilities within the City limits as identified on a map (virtually all facilities). The Unified Sewerage Agency is responsible for all industrial waste discharges, both in and out of cities. The Unified Sewerage Agency agrees not to extend sanitary sewer service to areas outside the City within the City's Urban Planning Area (as identified in the City-County UPAA) unless the City approves. The City is responsible for billing the customers after service is installed and for collecting sanitary and storm sewer connection fees. If the City imposes the same connection fees and user charges as U.S.A., it simply passes these monies on to U.S.A. to pay for the costs of treatment and transmission of the sewage or storm water. The City may impose higher costs than U.S.A. charges and keep the difference to offset City costs. Monthly sanitary sewer user charges are $15.30 per month plus a consumption charge of $1.386 per 100 cubic feet of water used by the customer. These City charges are the same as those charged by U.S.A.. 10. This property is already served water via an 8 inch Tualatin Valley Water District line located in SW Locust Street. Final Order - Page 9 . , ' • ~ Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 The territory to be annexed to the City of Tigard lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District, in the area of the District formerly in the Metzger Water District. The City of Tigard and the Tualatin Valley Water District have an informal agreement that territory in this area (Metzger) will not be withdrawn from the District upon annexation to the City until the Tigard Water Department is able to extend service to the annexed sites. The Tualatin Valley Water District serves primarily the northeastern portion of Washington County, bounded generally by Portland on the East, Tigard and Beaverton on the southeast and south, and Hillsboro to the West, and Skyline Drive to the North. As a result of a merger in 1991 the District includes territory previously served by the Metzger Water District. The Tualatin Valley Water District purchases water from the City of Portland on a wholesale basis. The District owns 74.5 % of the Washington County Supply Line (WCSL), or approximately 44.7 MGD of the 60 MGD available. Tualatin Valley has 29.4 MGD of capacity available, on standby, from the City of Portland's Arlington and Burlingame standpipes. The share of this available to the Metzger area is 7.4 MGD which would come from the Burlingame standpipe. The Joint V1/ater Commission (JWC) provides some additional potential capacity to the Tualatin Valley Water District. The JWC is a partnership between Hillsboro, Forest Grove and Beaverton that enables each city or district member to opt into the water supply as needed. Treated water originating in the Tualatin River headwaters, Scoggins Reservoir, and the Trask River Dam is sotd by the Commission to its members. The TVWD currently owns 6 MGD of capacity, and is committed to participation in an improvement project (the expansion of the Barney reservoir) which will provide an additional 12 MGD to the TVWD. Tualatin Valley Water District's total water source amount is currently 50.7 MGD. After the completion of the Barney reservoir, which supplies the JWC, that figure will be 62.7 MGD. The current water rates for the Tualatin Valley Water District are based on bi-monthly charges. A residential 3/4" meter is charged a base charge of $9.75 plus $1.19 per 100 cu. ft. (ccf) for the first 50 hundred cubic feet. Additional use is charged 52.00/ccf. The system development charge for a standard 3/4 inch meter is $2160 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). 11. Upon annexation to the City, the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the Washington County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District and the District's $ .6372 per thousand property tax will no longer be levied against the territory. The County Service District provides a level of service of .51 officers per 1000 population which in addition to the general County level of .43 officers per 1000 population means that the current level is .94 officers per 1000 population. Subsequent to annexation, the Tigard Police Department will provide police protection to the territory. Tigard provides a service level of 1.4 officers per thousand population. Emergency response in Tigard is under five minutes. Final Order - Page 10 . 1 ' • • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 12. The territory is within the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District. Annexation will not affect this service because the City is in the District. 13. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Urban Road Maintenance District. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the District and the District's levy of $.2458 per $1000 assessed value will no longer apply to the property. 14. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Vector Control District. Tigard is not a part of the District. Upon annexation, the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the unfunded Washington County Vector Control District. 15. The territory is within the Washington County Service District #1 for street lights. The District provides services to areas within its boundary which request street lighting services. The District uses local improvement districts to finance the service. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the District. The City provides street lighting service out of its Street fund which receives -State shared gasoline tax revenues as its primary revenue source. 16. Tigard operates a park system funded through its tax base which finances the general fund. Tigard has 6 developed recreation park sites. 17. There are eleven public libraries in Washington County, nine of which are provided by cities, including Tigard. 18. The Unified Sewerage Agency levies an annual assessment for storm drainage services of $36 per dwelling unit of which $24 goes to the City. Final Order - Page 11 ~ PROPOSAL ■ 3924 NE1/4 NE1/4 SECTION 35 T1S R1W W.M. 1S .1' 35AA Washington County Scale: 1200' ea• ~ ~ ~ T 102 '•Js36 u.uua n / m.n I me.mn -T 301 ~ AREA TO BE .,.,.~A 1ro,17 ANNEXED ~ 00 / ~ ~ ~ • s~: _ j_w ~ i s 701 ~ soo aox"~ a3 ~m e ~ •~e .u I 6 ~ I J y3_ ~ 4 ±13 ;2_1 _ L CUST STREET ' : . w soa -1 J ~ 12864 ~ z ~a* 00 ~ aoo ' - ieoi ~ I II 2 ~r ~ 12~ ~~o O 600 I500 • ~ .e . 803 ~3 O ~ v lJ..~ y I 61G5 ,~1` S `I6 I w / C a ~ a =1 ' i ~ ; ae i e ~i ~ ieool I w soi T I_isoz - ~ I ~ w• ~ i 3 w i a _eao' 19 ee'_ °1900 I_~0 > 1 m J 1800~ ~ 23-64= Q ' 1aao_ ~ , 0-~iooi ' ~ _ ,o i r,-• i ; o - - ~ IP 1 l~/~ r IT iz - I i 20 1002 23- Im 1=6 ~ cs.ro»s ~ eli' I ~ ~ ~ . / . - e--~Z-- TIGARD L w. 1 SAPLFLFP.F STREEi , tioi - -~-19 ; ~-ian ~ ' - ~ - •~~4 o~ s_ Mea ~zooo zioa zzoo 6 -1-I ---J i'' r•I .alae 12202 ~ S I G $UPPLEM AL 3 i wz ~101100 0No.i _ 6 2201 j i J L . . . . . . . . : - . . . . ~ fii:'sl . 'ii..a . ~nc 4200 / ~39 ~13800 ',3707 '~I 8 39 1 {n 37M ~tzsoo I 1.. I zwo Izaoo " 2303'y ~'vI w. aes}i ' : ~2400ai - - n..n 3902 02 ~ 23C5 I' ~LR ~ • ~ I -I 3703 Oi 3704 oo iz Ie roa zsoz~ Q I8 4101 ~ 3901 rcs.... ~ ~ • ~aron :I• 13~ °!6 J IS I~ OOAK STREETI 01 r ~ I• ' ' I r~,~i.s J/" ~ • !2600 •A•~ 2700 Z901 29003~00 - - da ez~ • o ' + + ~ I I I ~.e. ~ ~ 2800 . at00 4500 ~ .a.~ ~ .17.c. ~ 53 5 2,. PROPOSAL N0, 3924 ~ 36P0 1e soo' 3300 ~ 43Op C)~o CITY OF TIGARD S~ ANNEXATION 3~,0 FIGURE 2 'Z°' ~ 'w° ~6 I 2 r~ I aC l, J•I ',s'. PI-NE - E + TIGAi= STREET •IS I ~ . . ` ~ • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 REASONS FOR DECISION Based on the Findings, the Commission determined: 1. The proposal is consistent with City, County, and Regional planning for the area. 2. The City can provide an adequate quantity and quality of public services to the area. 3. The proposal is consistent with the Boundary Commission Policy On Incorporated Status (OAR 193-05-005) and the Policy On Long Term/Long Range Governmental Structure (OAR 193-05-015). ~ Final Order - Page 12 Exhibit B Proposal No. 3924 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ANNEXATION TO , City of Tigard A tract of land situated in the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point South 89130' West, 60 feet from the Initial Point of the TOWN OF METZGER as recorded in the records of Washington County; thence South 82.25 feet to the North right-of-way of SW Locust Street; thence South 89030' West, 31.10 feet; thence North 00021' West, 10.00 feet; thence South 89136' West, 47.59 feet; thence along a 1885.1 foot radius, non-tangent curve to the left (chord bears North 24155'54" East, 79.77 feet) a distance of 79.78 feet; thence North 89030' East, 48.36 feet to the Point of Beginning. Final Order - Page 13 September 11, 1998 C~ OF ~G~D OREGON Annexations Center for Population Research & Census Portland State University PO Box 751 Portland, OR 97207 RE: Annexation Final Order Number 3924 Enclosed please find the questionnaire and completed census schedule for the above referenced annexation. Thank you, Vivian Nimmo Administrative Specialist I ~ enclosures i:\curpln\vivian\annex\psucover.doc c: Land use file ZCA 98-0007 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 ~y . ~ • Return completed questionnaire to: Center for Papulation Research and Census Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Pvrtland, OR 97207-0751 A N N E S A T I a N. Q II E 8 T I O N N A I R E City of Tiqard Courlty of Washing -on Annexation Ordinance Number or Final Order Number 3924 Effective Date of Annexation Auqust 20, 1998 . . , NOTE: Enumeration of annexations which involve 200 or more housing units must be conduczed under the supervision of the Center for Population Research and Census in order to be certified to the Secretary of State. Complete the following section if there are less than 200 housinq units in this annexation. Attach completed confidential census schedules for all housing units both vacant and occupied. There must be one sheet for each inhabitable housing unit. HOUSING UNITS P,ND POPULATION AT TIME OF ANNEXATION TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT PERSONS UNITS IN SINGLE FAMILY STRUCTURES 0 UNITS IN MULTIPLE FAMILY STRUCTURES 0 MOBILE HOMES OR TRAILERS 0 TOTAL POP[TLATION OF ANNEXED AREA 0 Date of Certif ication 9/10/98 . CERTIFIED BY. Vivian Nimmo TITLE Administrative Specialist I TELEPHONE NUMBER (503) 639-4171 ext. 419 This questionnaire and the completed census schedules are the only data used to certify annexed population to the Secretary of. State. Please DO NOT send maps, copies of the final ordinance, lists of addresses, etc. to our office unless you are requested to do so. If there are any questions, or to schedule a census, contact Howard Wineberg at the Center for Population Research and Census, 725-3922. THANK YOU. *CONFIDENTIAIA* City of Tigard Address No address; WCTM 251135AA, 00400 HOUSING TYPE TENURE Single Unit Structure Owner Occupied Multiple Unit Structure Renter Occupied Trailer or Mobile Home Vacant (X) RESIDENTS Last Name First Name Sex Age Respondent 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. , g, 9. 10. Portland State University School of Urban and Public Affairs Center For Population Research and Census 725-3922 . ~ • i, Citq of Tigard Community ~DeveCopment Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: INTERESTED PARTIES FROM: Vivian Nimmo, Planning Division Assistant DATE: September 11, 1998 SUBJECT: Final Order, Annexation No. 3924 (ZCA 98-0007 - Turner Annexation) We have received the final order from the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission, Boundary Change Proposal No. 3924 (ZCA 98-0007 EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 20, 1998 Map of the annexed property is attached. Census information is as follows: OWNER(S) NAME AND ADDRESS: SPECIFIC PARCEL DATA: Steve Turner WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 00400 2015 SW Kanan Street Undeveloped, no address Portland, OR 97201 Est. Population: 0 0 Please refer any questions to Julia Powell Hajduk at ext. 407. Attachment i:\curpln\vivian\annex\memo.doc Annexation Memo - Page 1 of 1 PROPOSAL ■ 3924 NE1 /4 NE1 f4 SECTION 35 T1 S R1 W W.M. 1 S 1' 35AA Washington County - - - - - ~ - - - - - _ Scale: 1 200' "ss I 3s i I _1 mo.mr ~T d 4' AREA TO BE - ~ ----A ` - ANNEXED ' ~ co « ~ ~ 0SA.Z c NVW ~ j T • ` ~ • 73024, •i ,;soo eoz"I os • ~ ~ i ~ . : ~e•. s~ . y3 < ~I L CUST . STREET i w 9Oa T i ' > '1 uz - ' _ eoa Z. soo ~ oo ~ieoi • .e ~ cf) ~ / • ~ uoo ` • • 805 W I > z . U_ ieool . , i e i =I W : w _ 901 r 36 ~ i I> li Z •1900 J ieoo~ ~~lo~ W ~ m 23-64 = Q ' ~ooa-- cr•IOOI ~ 1 / ••3 e ~l - : : r I T Z - I ~ ~ • °,E ~ ci ~ - I 1702 1)0p ~ 10021 20' ~23- .-e - : ; TIGARD ; - - ~ s I6 .e,. L ;APLFLFP.F STREET , ~ iioi- ~-19 ° i ~-i~ ' _ • _ _ -~•6 1_~ _ J 1 a r ao~~ 5_ Mn7 ~ 2000 ' 2f00 ~.o.i 2200 •a. r-- r. 2202 ~ I5 1 a .es •c / 1 ~ 3 ~ SUPPLEM Al 3 102• II0I100 N0.1 s~ E I 9 a Y 8 ' • 2201+~ i ~200.. . I . lai::1. .~is:w... ~ 1. ~ O J V . a Z . 39 I to I / .}9 i:1800 !3707 L ~ I 3705 Y 500 L = I 2~00 . ~2300 2303~ Rel1i ~ 240041 I 3902 02 ~ I 3ro = 1/ r 23C5 r+.v • t d , 3703 « ol 3704 Y ' oo rz roa raoz ~ 13901 4101 f ' as.~ I ~ ~ ma~~~ _I ~S7G2 „ a.6 ~ IS I6 .ao '•OAK . ' STREET' JM' 2600 2700 'c801' ~ 2907` 3:00 - - - cj~ az~ • a ' i - ~ 1 ~ ~ 2800 ~ I ~ 4e00 a500 ~ i 53 52' : 21 PROPOSAL N0, 3924 36po 1e soo 3300 = 4300 ~o CITY OF TIGARD V~ ANNEXATION °O FIGURE 2 3~ . sza szoo 6 le • I .s' . ~ r~l A T PI-NE • E STREET TIGAi- ~ ~ - IS I I - - . • ~ Citq of Tigard Community DeveCopment Shaping A Better Community MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Chief of Police, City Engineer, Engineering Technician/Jurisdiction Coordinator, Water/Accounting (Amanda Bewersdorff), Building Official, Library Director, GIS Specialist, City Recorder, Operations Manager and DST Supervisor. '1/j FROM: Vivian Nimmo, Planning Division Assistant DATE: September 11, 1998 SUBJECT: Final Order, Annexation No. 3924 (ZCA 98-0007 - Turner Annexation) We have received the final order from the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission, Boundary Change Proposal No. 3924 (ZCA 98-0007). EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 20, 1998 Map of the annexed property is attached. Census information is as follows: OWNER(S) NAME AND ADDRESS: SPECIFIC PARCEL DATA: Steve Turner WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400 2015 SW Kanan Street Undeveloped, no address Portland, OR 97201 Est. Population: 0 Please refer any questions to Julia Powell Hajduk at ext. 407. Attachment i:\curpl n\vivia n\a n nex\memo. doc Annexation Memo - Page 1 of 1 ~ • -T. PROPOSAL ■ 3924 NE1 /4 NE1 f4 SECTION 35 T1 S R1 W W.M. 1 S 1' 35AA Washington County Scale: 1 200' -7-- ~s: .-F r ...r J 'i ~ i02 ' 33 \ 36 c~.uum e / ~ .o...e..: m.n ' ~ -1 mo.mc k i •M~ 301 . J 4 AREA TO BE s ANNEXED ~ ~ • ~ ' ~ - / ~ 00 cE NVW . ~ ~ d -K ~ spp : 302 ~ ~ w-~., 70~ ~ r}we;if• .,3 I S I i ~ so° I i i eoz"I v~. ~ I : I ~ I i: I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:i~•J.~. ` ~ c a.~• ~ i la L CUST . STREET w e04 '-~eoa I ~ O 600 ~ 00/ S~ +i400 ~1601 J 1 112 ~ .r . 12i ue 'Z 1600 • Q - i . - - ~ r 805 ~ I ~ ~ '~7lr. I ~ ~ 6 KS ~ n 16 ,3 W ~ 3 Q ~ ' II6A0~ . e I B 1 "I w ~ ' W . 90i ' I ~ r ` ~ ' ~ ~ ? ~ • ' I I 1602 I 1 :1 I ~ ee..+ ~ f 0 ; 10.~ 5. 3 / I Z ; !s.- isoo i=o ) _ ~ m ieoa~ W` > ~ ;,V 23-64= Q ~ 1000 < ~ ~ ,e i r,e•~ ;o ~ ~ Y ~ IOOl i R ~~az I uco - : c5.~7a ~ 12 i 20' ~=r ~ toaZ J el.. I-3 TIGARD co 'APLFLFP,F STREEi J IS I M°n ~~000 ' 2l00 o.i 2200 ZZ02 ~ ~ SUPPIEM AL 3 ~oz ~io~~oo 7 0No.i ~ Cf) N : Z201 i s: 6 ~e ~ 9.r B ~.:.r• ae' ~ J " . . . . < . ~ . iis.a 8 J ~ 20 0 / !39 3800f..n~ -.3707 r - - - - "~I . Q z 39 t ~ I ~ 2500 I 200 ~ ' 5902 02 n.n ~2<0041 C ~ • ~ I 3701 « Oi S70a ~ „ 00 Z 11 I 12 ~s I I ••w'w Z:04 I 2302 a ~ ~ Is 8 ~ 401 i 3901 ~ I ' a~i~'I• I}~ =6 ~ IS IO na .ao =jr C)~iC) OOAK . STREET' il ~ I,. ~ - • lo* I• I ~2600 2700 ZB01 2907 1:00 2800 4-00 ~ 4500 ~ 5 3 5 Z; e ~ PROPOSAL NOo 3924 soo' 3300 ~ 4300 ~~o CITY OF TIGARD ~9~~~ ANNEXATION FIGURE Z 3100 _ -32q .I rl A Io~ T. j . .6 , 1_ PLNE • F STREET TIGAr= IS I ~ . . • • Citq of Tigard Community DeveCopment ShapingA BetterCommunity MEMORANDUM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TO: Chief of Police, City Engineer, Engineering Technician/Jurisdiction Coordinator, Water/Accounting (Amanda Bewersdorff), Building Official, Library Director, GIS Specialist, City Recorder, Operations Manager and DST Supervisor.~ ,~v-i FROM: Vivian Nimmo, Planning Division Assistant DATE: September 11, 1998 SUBJECT: Final Order, Annexation No. 3924 (ZCA 98-0007 - Turner Annexation) This is a revised notice of the final order from the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission, Boundary Change Proposal No. 3924 (ZCA 98- 0007). P/ease disregard the memorandum dated September 9, 1998. EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 20, 1998 Map of the annexed property is attached. Census information is as follows: OWNER(S) NAME AND ADDRESS: SPECIFIC PARCEL DATA: Steve Turner WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400 2015 SW Kanan Street Undeveloped, no address Portland, OR 97201 Est. Population: 0 Please refer any questions to Julia Powell Hajduk at ext. 407. Attachment i:lcurpln\vivian\a n nex\memo. doc Annexation Memo - Page 1 of 1 OTY OF TIGARD, OREGON • ORDINANCE NO. 98-1 b AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0007-TURNER ANNEXATION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 9, 1998 to consider a zoning designation for one (1) parcel consisting of .11 acres located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; and WHEREAS, on June 9, 1998 the Tigard City Council approved a Resolution to forward the proposed annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Governnient Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by Planning Staff, as set foRh in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below, is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use designation of Neighborhood Commercial while implementing the City of Tigard's existing Comprehensive Plan Designation of Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected properties shall be designated as follows: Tax Map/Lot Numbers 1 S 135AA, Tax Lot 00400 Current Comarehensive Plan Designation and Zoning Wa. Co. Neighborhood Commercial New Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By u{I~"E i1 i n104S vote of all C uncil members present after being read by number and title only, this Ci 41 day of ,t,~ C-, , 1998. l j Z~~ herine Wheatley, City ecord APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this da f tLng~ , 1998. J s Nicoli, Mayor App;ved as to form• , Ci Atto ey J F, 4S ~J' Date ORDINANCE NO. 98- iAcitywide\ord\zca98-07.ord Page 1 of I Julia P H 21-May-98 3:22 PM • • Agenda Item: Hearing Date: June 9,1998 7:30 PM ; ± . STAFF':REPORT TO..THE 7C [ y y 1 . ~=~CITY COUNCIL ~ . , . . CITY OF TIOARD~ FOR TNE CITY.OFTIGARD, OREG`ON ~ . . . . :u . - _ . . . _ _ . SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY ' CASE: FILE NAME: TURNER ANNEXATION Zone Change Annexation ZCA 98-0007 PROPOSAL: To annex one (1) lot consisting of .11 acres of un-incorporated • Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial, C-N. APPLICANT: Steven Tumer OWNERS: Various Owners 2015 SW Kanan Street (List Available Portland, OR 97201 Upon Request) CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. RECOMMENDED ZONING DESIGNATION: It is recommended that the City of Tigard Zoning Designation of Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) be designated upon annexation as this designation most closely conforms to the County's current designation. LOCATION: The subject parcel is located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Sections 18.136 and 18.138. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the,Council. find that the proposed :annexation .will not.adversely affect the- health, safety and welfare.of the City. .,Therefore,~staff recomrriends ; : APPROVAL of the annexation by adoption of the attached Resolufion 0n&Ordinance. x ti, STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 1 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 6/9/98 PUBLIC HEARING • • SECTION M. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Historv: The property is currently vacant. The owner of the lot wishes to annex in order to develop the property and receive city services. No development proposal has been formally proposed, nor has the applicant scheduled a pre-application meeting. Vicinitv Information: The area to be annexed is .11 acres. The existing city boundary runs along the southem portion of this property, along SW Locust Street. The site and the property to the north, east and west are within Tigard's Area of Interest but outside of the Tigard city limits. The properties to the north, east and west are outside city limits and zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) and the property to the south is inside the city limits and zoned R-12. Site Information and Proposal Description: The proposal is to annex into the City of Tigard in order to develop the property and obtain City services. The applicant has requested that the .11 acre site be annexed into the City of Tigard by means of the double-majority method. Representing the owners of more than half of the land (100%) and a majority of the registered electors (100%) of the area proposed to be annexed, the applicant has initiated this action through the written consent of the property owner. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. . Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant policies of the Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: . Policv 2.1.1: This Policy requires an ongoing citizen involvement program and is satisfied because the East CIT and surrounding property owners have been notified of the public hearing and notice of the hearing has been published in a newspaper of general circulation. Policy 10.1.1: This Policy requires adequate service capacity delivery to annexed parcels and is satisfied because the City of Tigard Police, Engineering and Water Departments, Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) and Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (NF&R) have all reviewed the annexation request and have offered no objections. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 619/98 PUBIIC HEARING , • • ' Policy 10.1.2: This Policy pertains to boundary criteria for annexations and is satisfied. The property is adjacent to property on the south that is inside the Tigard city limits. The affected land is located within the City's Urban Services Area (Area of Interest) and is contiguous to the city boundary. Adequate services are also available to accommodate the properties. The Police Department has been notified of this request and has no objections, however, they have requested that all properties east and west of the property be offered the option to annex in efforts to provide consistency in addressing and to reduce confusion to emergency service providers. Staff has sent letters to the property owners directly east and west of the site. If they wish to annex, the attached City Council Ordinance and Resolution can be amended accordingly. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based on the following findings: Section 18.136.030: This Section addresses approval standards for annexation proposals and is satisfied because: The applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Community Development Code provisions have been reviewed and satisfied as previously indicated in this report. The City of Tigard zoning designation of Neighborhood Commercial most closely conforms to the County designation of the same classification. This also satisfies Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.1.3. The determination that the affected property is an established area is based on the standards set forth in Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Community Development Code and OAR 660-007-0005. Section 18.138: This Section provides standards for the classification of annexed land and is satisfied because: . The affected property meets the definition of an established area and shall be designated as such. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering, Public Works, Police and Water Departments have all reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 3 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 619/98 PUBLIC HEARING . • • ' SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The Metro Area Boundary Commission, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, Unified Sewerage Agency, Columbia Cable, Metro Area Communications, TCI, Tualatin Valley Water District, PGE, NW Natural Gas, US West Communications, GTE, and Washington County have had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no objections. BASED ON THE FINDINGS INDICATED`ABOVE; PLANNING STAFF ; . . RECOMMENDS APPROVAL,OF,ZONE CHANGE~ANNEXATION: ' . ' :(ZCA)`r98-000:7, :TURNERtsANNEXATION~ti~ Ma 21 1998 PREPARED BY• Julia Powell Vajduk DATE Associate Planner - w Mav 21, 1998 APPROVED BY: Richard Bewepdo-iff DATE Planning Manager i:\curplnv ulia\annex\zca98-07.doc STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 6/9/98 PUBLIC HEARING • • August 20, 1998 Hearing PROPOSAL NO. 3924 - CITY OF TIGARD - Annexation Petitioner: City of Tigard, Steve Turner 90th Day: September 24, 1998 Proposal No. 3924 was initiated by a petition of property owners/registered voters and resolution from the Tigard City Council. The resolution and petitions meet the require- ments for initiation set forth in ORS 199.490(2)(a) (B), double-majority annexation law. If the Commission approves the proposal, the boundary change will become effective on the date of approval subject to the provisions of ORS 199.519. The territory to be annexed is located generally on the north edge of the City, on the north edge of SW Locust Street, east of SW Jefferson Street, and west of SW 87th Avenue. The territory contains .11 acres, is vacant and is evaluated at $25,000: REASON FOR ANNEXATION The owners desire city services to facilitate development. They propose to develop the site into a small (1500 square feet) office building. BOUNDARY COMMISSION POLICIES The Boundary Commission has three adopted policies. The first of these policies states that the Commission generally sees cities as the primary providers of urban services. Recognizing that growth of cities may cause financial problems for the districts, the Commission states in the second policy that the Commission will help find solutions to the problems. The third policy states that the Commission may approve illogical boundaries in the short term if these lead to logical service arrangements in the long term. LAND USE PLANNING Re4ional Planninct. The territory is within the regional Urban Growth Boundary and the boundary of Metro. Washinqton Countv Plannin4. Policy 15 of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan states the County's "Roles And Responsibilities" relative to Urbanization: It is the policy of Washington County to work with service providers, including cities and special districts, and the Portland Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission, to insure that Proposal No. 3924 - Page 1 • • facilities and services required for growth will be provided when needed by the agency or agencies best able to do so in a cost effective and efficient manner. The County Community Plan consists of a plan map and plan text which includes identifi- cation of general design elements, specific design elements and areas of special concern. The County community plan for this area is the Metzger-Progress Community Plan. This Community Plan identifies the territory to be annexed as NC, Neighborhood Commercial. This designation "permits smaller scale commercial facilities which are generally oriented towards serving the surrounding neighborhood area." The General Design Elements of the Metzger-Progress Community Plan include such items as encouragement of the protection of significant trees, retention of open space, preserva- tion of older sound housing stock where feasible, etc.. The last general design element (No. 22) states: Piecemeal annexation of land in this Planning Area shall be discouraged because it damages the character of the Metzger community. If annexation is to occur, then annexation as a community unit is preferred. (NOTE: It should be noted that several large scale and a number single lot annexations in the Metzger area have occurred since this general preference was placed in the Plan. Also more specific conditions for annexation are laid out in the UPAA and the City's Comprehensive Plan-see below.) Urban Plannin4 Area AQreement. The City of Tigard and Washington County have entered into an Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) which is a part of both the County's and Tigard's adopted Comprehensive Plans. The UPAA sets out an "Active Planning Area" within which the City assumes responsibility for land use planning, and an "Area of Interest" in which the County agrees to coordinate its planning because of the potential impacts on Tigard. This proposal falls within the "Area of Interest" as designated in the UPAA. The following pertinent provisions are from Section B, "Area of Interest" portion of the UPAA: A. Area of Interest 1. Definition Area of Interest or Primarv Area of Interest means unincorporated lands contiguous to the Active Planning Area in which the CITY does not conduct comprehensive planning but in which the CITY does maintain an interest in comprehensive planning and development actions by the COUNTY because of potential impacts on the CITY Active Planning Area.... 2. The COUNTY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning and develop- ment actions within the Area of Interest. Proposal No. 3924 - Page 2 • • 3. The COUNTY is responsible for the preparation, adoption and amendment of the public facility plan required by OAR 660-11 within the Area of Interest. 4. The CITY may consider requests for annexations in the Area of Interest subject to the following: a. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the Area of Interest as a condition to the provision of urban services for development. b. Annexations by the CITY within the Area of Interest shall not create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete the island annexation. c. The CITY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other representative means for annexation in the Metzger/Progress Community Planning Area, which includes Washington Square, within the CITY Area of Interest. Not contrary to the foregoing, the CITY reserves all of its rights to annex and acknowledges the rights of individual property owners to annex to the CITY pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes. d. Upon annexation of land within the Area of Interest to the CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations to CITY plan designations which most closely approximate the density, use provi- sions and standards of COUNTY designations. Furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this designation for one year after the effective date of annexation unless both the CITY and ihe COUNTY Planning Directors agree at the time of annexation that the COUNTY designation is outdated and an amendment may be initiated before the one year period is over. Countv 2000. Washington County reviewed its role in service provision in its Countv 2000 program. This program essentially lays out a long range strategic and fiscal plan for the County. In this document, the County adopted a policy of supporting a service delivery system which distinguishes between municipal and county-wide services to achieve tax fairness and expenditure equity in the provision of public services. The County policy states that municipal services should be provided either by cities or special districts. Citv of Ti4ard PlanninQ. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan consists of the Resource Document (Volume I) and the FindinQS, Policies & Imolementation StrateQies (Volume II). The Tigard Community Development Code and the Washington County-Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement should also be considered a part of the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Tigard has a"city limits" plan. The County's plan and ordinances remain applicable unless the City takes other action after the annexation is effective. The following policies from Volume II of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan appear to be relevant to this proposal: Policy 7.1.1 THE CITY SHALL: Proposal No. 3924 - Page 3 • • a. Prepare and implement a capital improvements program in conjunction with Washington County and the applicable service districts; b. Work with the service districts to provide a coordinated system for providing services; c. Provide urban services in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan to the extent of the City's financial resources; d. Use the Capital- lmprovements Program as a means for providing for orderly growth and the efficient use of land; e. Develop a Comprehensive Plan with consideration being given to the level and capacity of the existing services; and f. Adopt locational criteria as the basis for making decisions about the property location for public facilities. POLICY 7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRE-CONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the City unless the property involved is over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The Facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to City standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. Policy 10.1.1 PRIOR TO THE ANNEXATION OF LAND TO THE CITY OF TIGARD: a. The city shall review each of the following services as to adequate capacity, or such services to be made available, to serve the parcel if developed to the most intense use allowed, and will not significantly Proposal No. 3924 - Page 4 • • reduce the level of services available to developed and undeveloped land within the City of Tigard. The services are: 1. water; . 2. sewer; 3. drainage; 4. streets; 5. police; and 6. fire protection. b. If required by an adopted capital improvements program ordinance, the applicant shall sign and record with Washington County a non- remonstrance agreement regarding the following: 1. The formation of a local improvement district (L.I.D.) for any of the following services that could be provided through such a dis- trict. The extension or improvement of the following: a) water; b) sewer; c) drainage; and d) streets. 2. The formation of a special district for any of the above services or the inclusion of the property into a special district for any of the above services. c. The City shall provide urban services to areas within the Tigard urban planning area or within the urban growth boundary upon annexation. Policy 10.1.2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS OF LAND BY THE CITY SHALL BE BASED ON FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING: a. The annexation eliminates an existing "pocket" or "island" of unincor- porated territory; or b. The annexation will not create an irregular boundary that makes it difficult for the police in an emergency situation to determine whether the parcel is within or outside the city; c. The police department has commented upon the annexation; d. The land is located within the Tigard urban planning area and is contiguous to the city boundary; e. The annexation can be accommodated by the services listed in 10.1.1(a). Proposal No. 3924 - Page 5 • • Policy 10.1.3 UPON ANNEXATION OF LAND INTO THE CITY WHICH CARRIES A WASHINGTON COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATION, THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSIGN THE CITY OF TIGARD ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION WHICH MOST CLOSELY CONFORMS TO THE COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATION. , Policy 10.2.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF CITY OR UNIFIED SEWERAGE (USA) LINES EXCEPT: a. Where applications for annexation for those properties have been submitted to the City; or b. Where a nonremonstrance agreement to annex those properties has been signed and recorded with Washington County and submitted to the City; or c. Where the applicable state or county health agency has declared that there is a potential or imminent health hazard. The pertinent Tigard Community Development Code sections appear to be Chapters 18.136, Annex- ations; and 18.138, Established/Developing Area Classification. , Chapter 18.136 contains approval standards for the City Council when reviewing a proposed annexation prior to submission to the Boundary Commission. These standards are: A. The decision to approve, approve with modification, or deny an application to annex property to the City shall be based on the following criteria: 1. All services and facilities are available to the area and have sufficient capacity to provide service for the proposed annexation area; and 2. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and implementing ordinance provi- sion have been satisfied. B. The plan designation and the zoning designation placed on the property shall be the City's zoning district which most closely implements the City's or County's compre- hensive plan map designation. C. The determination of whether the property is an established area or a developing area will be based on the standards contained in Chapter 18.138. Chapter 138 provides standards for classifying all lands annexed to the City as either Established Area (unbuildable or essentially built-out) or Developing Area (buildable). The code requires that one of these two designations be applied to all land at the time of annexation. The City Council conducted a public hearing on the annexation and approved the annexation on June 9, 1998. Proposal No. 3924 - Page 6 • • FACILITIES AND SERVICES Sewer. There is an 8-inch City sewer located in SW Locust St. along the south edge of the territory to be annexed. The territory is within the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County as is the City. The Unified Sewerage Agency has a standard agreement between the Agency and the large cities within the Agency (Beaverton, Cornelius, Forest Grove, Hillsboro, Tigard, Tualatin and Sherwood). In that agreement the Cities agree to: 1) comply with the Agency's construction and maintenance standards for sanitary and storm water sewer facilities, 2) follow and accomplish the Agency's work program for storm and surface water, 31 obtain the Agency's consent before issuing construction permits within wet- lands, floodways and floodplains. The agreement provides that the city owns and is responsible for sanitary sewer lines under 24 inches in diameter within the City limits and for storm water facilities within the City limits as identified on a map (virtually all facilities). The Unified Sewerage Agency is responsible for all industrial waste discharges, both in and out of cities. The Unified Sewerage Agency agrees not to extend sanitary sewer service to areas outside the City within the City's Urban Planning Area (as identified in the City- County UPAA) unless the City approves. The City is responsible for billing the customers after service is installed and for collecting sanitary and storm sewer connection fees. If the City imposes the same connection fees and user charges as U.S.A., it simply passes these monies on to U.S.A. to pay for the costs of treatment and transmission of the sewage or storm water. The City may impose higher costs than U.S.A. charges and keep the difference to offset City costs. Monthly sanitary sewer user charges are $15.30 per month alus a consumption charge of $1.386 per 100 cubic feet of water used by the customer. These City charges are the same as those charged by U.S.A.. Water. This property is already served water via an 8 inch Tualatin Valley Water District line located in SW Locust Street. The territory to be annexed to the City of Tigard lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District, in the area of the District formerly in the Metzger Water District. The City of Tigard and the Tualatin Valley Water District have an informal agreement that territory in this area (Metzger) will not be withdrawn from the District upon annexation to the City until the Tigard Water Department is able to extend service to the annexed sites. The current water rates for the Tualatin Valley Water District are based on bi-monthly charges. A residential 3/4" meter is charged a base charge of $9.75 plus $1.19 per 100 cu. ft. (ccf) for the first 50 hundred cubic feet. Additional use is charged 52.00/ccf. The system development charge for a standard 3/4 inch meter is $2160 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). Police. Upon annexation to the City, the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the Washington County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District and the District's $ .6372 per Proposal No. 3924 - Page 7 • • thousand property tax will no longer be levied against the territory. The County Service District provides a level of service of .51 officers per 1000 population which in addition to the general County level of .43 officers per 1000 population means that the current level is .94 officers per 1000 population. Subsequent to annexation, the Tigard Police Department will provide police protection to the territory. Tigard provides a service level of 1.4 officers per thousand population. Emergency response in Tigard is under five minutes. Fire. The territory is within the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District. Annexation will not affect this service because the City is in the District. Transportation. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Urban Road Maintenance District. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the District and the District's levy of $.2458 per $1000 assessed value will no longer apply to the property. Vector Control. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Vector Control District. Tigard is not a part of the District. Upon annexation, the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the unfunded Washington County Vector Control District. Street Lights. The territory is within the Washington County Service District #1 for street lights. The District provides services to areas within its boundary which request street lighting services. The District uses local improvement districts to finance the service. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the District. The City provides street lighting service out of its Street fund which receives State shared gasoline tax revenues as its primary revenue source. Parks and Librarv. Tigard operates a park system funded through its tax base which finances the general fund. Tigard has 6 developed recreation park sites. There are eleven public libraries in Washington County, nine of which are provided by cities, including Tigard. Storm DrainaQe. The Unified Sewerage Agency levies an annual assessment for storm drainage services of $36 per dwetling unit of which $24 goes to the City. RECOMMENDATION Based on the study and the proposed Findings and Reasons for Decisions found in Exhibit A, the staff recommends that Proposal No. 3924 be approved. Proposal No. 3924 - Page 8 , ' • ~ ■ P OPOSAL NO 3924 . ~ y BEAVERTO' ~ ~ 4''• ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~ ` ` ~ s ~ . Poo- R EA T4 BE 6 1 a 1 ~ ~ - ~ 1 . ANNEXED ....o. 1 TIGARO \ Poo. 21.]75 i IU~- ` ~ ' ~ 1 ' ( • L~•~ F~ ` •~.nn. . ` ~ ~ ~ j _ ~ , ~ a• ~ ~ ~ v... , ` , . ;:b ~ C . a ~ t r~ ~ \ ~ II Y~tiOs~ I Y • j~ . ~ , ~ q ' ~ { -'j ~ P L~V A ~•~~'J ,a~• a t ..~~~~r.- J ,i. ~ _ - Y r' \ ira•om ,PS", o: ~ ~ ~I r'°. ~ ' vw.uY ~~1 _ F 4~a ~Y ~ ~ ~..or 1 ✓ / ~ • / \ ~ l ~ r ~i ' ~ ~ ` ~a :II~- I p • / ~,c•cc tit Li ~ i/ •\~1'O.C♦ ~J'~~ _ pn..~^tl a~I wN• ~..0 ~ ~ ~ ll. a ~ ~ ~ ~ - rI ~ ~ t 1 : ~t tb ~ ` ~ , ci. g ~ •r ~ R ¢ lJ~ '7 t,ss la.`TT'_\ ~ v. ~ \'a.~`\~4T ~ ~ ~~r • '7 \ ^ a. 4 ~ yE ~ ~M1 (r r ti ~1 ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ i . ~ J - ~-~~t CY ti ~r ~ fr"^-• . T I G AR t~ v ~ ' ! ~ ~`a ~`,-..r. / co~^.c. 3 iC ro' ~ ~ ~ - a' • R ~ 'l ~ t• j \ ' ~ y'a~ac~. CW~~, .~•r' L, ~ al p n .n ~ ~ ~ ~J ` ' ~ • ~ I Q ,s~,. 'Y ~ ^ ~ \ ~ ~ b~ ~ UlJ v='~~ ~':c--~ ~ . ~ ir ~ a• , l` j~• ~ ~ l'_ ~ t~. qREA SHOWN~. ~ 1... . ~~...o : ~ , ^[~OVE 1=-~ 1"1 LJ ..g . c_~.v.t si. l ~ ` 1_~, i~ ! .,~j:~y_4 y9 ok~ PROPOSAL N0. 3924 CITY OF TIGARD ANNEXAT I ON r . FIGURE 1 ~ =1 . • PROPOSAL ■ 3924 NE1 /4 NE1 /4 SECTION 35 T1 S R1 W W.M. 1 S 1 35AA Washington County I J I J: Scale: 1 200' ~ I>7~ ' • r r •e.!' ~r t02 ' 35 I 36 u~vaam A ael. ~..n'. -7/~-~ / uaVl ~ I CGO.]e>L' 301 ~ ~e 4 AREA TO BE .,.,.,a,,. ANNEXED ' ~ 3 I I I ~ra. r e~.an.a. . 05• ' - p - 00 . \ ~0'i-"~'y~ ~ . ~ ao eo ~ . .i6n,._. ~n• SOO~r 302 90 ~ I . 0 5 I I I 802~ , ~i'~~.~ i~!'f Y}Ab;f • y. I ~ 03 im we ~ ~ le° ~ I ~ e~ ~su ~ ~ 6 ~o.Y i L CUST ~ STREET j 904 ~j ~-vao<~- - .,Z ac_ i , vo , - a ~ iui ° . !O soo oo/•. ~aoo ~~eai 1500 I. 803 ~ 6 W 6tG5 W ~ / ' r.~. Q ~ ' I600I : 901 i f Xr I r e) ' I ~ 8 ~ r" ~ / o i e~~Y Q 1602 J LLI _ • ~9~__ I~L'o_ 63~ / y~I^1900 ~I90I J '1800 IIT1 I W I 'oao _ 23-64 = a ' r>< -j r,a•- ;a ~ ,,n. 0 -101. 1702 r f ~ ~Fr es.rosva ~ '23- r 0021 2 S I ~ - ~.o Y TIGARD ~•o I ~ s - - - - - - 1 s _ -17. 1 a:) tHPLFLEP.F STREE i , :i_6 sc Mnv ~ tooo - zioo ~.o., zzoo - 2202 ~ SUPPIEM Al ~ 3 `i' io2 iioo No.I N - - n, mu. ~ -I [ ~i ~~8 ~e 9 e ~.i.>' ae' ~ ~i • 2201=~ i . ~ . . . . -7 . ' . . . . u::b... ..n• ~ ~ - J 4200 / ~3. 9 ~:3800-- 8 39 ~ f a aios soo I • I OI $ _ 2 1 2t00 _ I2300 ' I_2303- _I w. Qa971 ~ 1 2<OOaI 1 ' 3902 02 1 1 i0 V 23C5 ~i~r ' • ,t I •I 3703 w 01 3704 r I e 1 1 I " 4*ycTW 00 I Z i? Z304 2302 ~ ~ 4101 ~ I3901 ixion 3702 - ~'6 ' J I S I6 aaaa 4100 C) J~C) aOAK . STREET' e...x u.i IL 2600 2700 Z801 29003,10 p - - - cia ezs • a ' ~ i ~ I ~ 2800 ~.o. . U) ( .na500 3 53 52; PROPOSAL N0, 3924 - 36?° IE zao' 3300 L 4300 CITY OF TIGARD ~ ~j' n~e~~ ANNEXATION 3201 ~ 5200 FIGURE 2 360~ - , ' 1 r~ r~ I o~ T J=I 6 PI-NE - ~ ' STREET : ~S A' • • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 FINDINGS Based on the study and the public hearing, the Commission found: 1. The territory to be annexed contains .11 acres, is vacant and is evaluated at $25,000. 2. The owners desire city services to facititate development. They propose to develop the site into a small (1500 square feet) office building. 3. The Boundary Commission has three adopted policies. The first of these policies states that the Commission generally sees cities as the primary providers of urban services. Recognizing that growth of cities may cause financial problems for the districts, the Commission states in the second policy that the Commission will help find solutions to the problems. The third policy states that the Commission may approve illogical boundaries in the short term if these lead to logical service arrangements in the ►ong term. 4. The territory is within the regional Urban Growth Boundary and the boundary of Metro. 5. Policy 15 of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan states the County's "Roles And Responsibilities" relative to Urbanization: It is the policy of Washington County to work with service providers, including cities and special districts, and the Portland Metropolitan Area Boundary Commission, to insure that facilities and services required for growth will be provided when needed by the agency or agencies best able to do so in a cost effective and efficient manner. The County Community Plan consists of a plan map and plan text which includes identification of general design elements, specific design elements and areas of special concern. The County community plan for this area is the Metzger-Progress Community Plan. This Community Plan identifies the territory to be annexed as NC, Neighborhood Commercial. This designation "permits smaller scale commercial facilities which are generally oriented towards serving the surrounding neighborhood area." The General Design Elements of the Metzger-Progress Community Plan include such items as encouragement of the protection of significant trees, retention of open Findings - Page 1 • • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 space, preservation of older sound housing stock where feasible, etc.. The last general design element (No. 22) states: Piecemeal annexation of land in this Planning Area shall be discouraged because it damages the character of the Metzger community. If annexation is to occur, then annexation as a community unit is preferred. (NOTE: It should be noted that several large scale and a number single lot annexations in the Metzger area have occurred since this general preference was placed in the Plan. Also more specific conditions for annexation are laid out in the UPAA and the City's Comprehensive Plan-see below.) 6. The City of Tigard and Washington County have entered into an Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA) which is a part o.f both the County's and Tigard's adopted Comprehensive Plans. The UPAA sets out an "Active Planning Area" within which the City assumes responsibility for land use planning, and an "Area of Interest" in which the County agrees to coordinate its planning because of the potential impacts on Tigard. This proposal falls within the "Area of Interest" as designated in the UPAA. The following pertinent provisions are from Section B, "Area of Interest" portion of the UPAA: A. Area of Interest 1. Definition Area of Interest or Primarv Area of Interest means unincorporated lands contiguous to the Active Planning Area in which the CITY does not conduct comprehensive planning but in which the CITY does maintain an interest in comprehensive planning and development actions by the COUNTY because of potential impacts on the CITY Active Planning Area.. . . 2. The COUNTY shall be responsible for comprehensive planning and development actions within the Area of Interest. 3. The COUNTY is responsible for the preparation, adoption and amendment of the public facility plan required by OAR 660-1 1 within the Area of Interest. 4. The CITY may consider requests for annexations in the Area of Interest subject to the following: a. The CITY shall not require annexation of lands in the Area of Interest as a condition to the provision of urban services for development. Findings - Page 2 ~ • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 b. Annexations by the CITY within the Area of Interest shall not create islands unless the CITY declares its intent to complete the island annexation. c. The CITY agrees in principle to a plebiscite or other representative means for annexation in the Metzger/Progress Community Planning Area, which includes Washington Square, within the CITY Area of Interest. Not contrary to the foregoing, the CITY reserves all of its rights to annex and acknowledges the rights of individual property owners to annex to the CITY pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes. d. Upon annexation of land within the Area of Interest to the CITY, the CITY agrees to convert COUNTY plan designations to CtTY plan designations which most closely approximate the density, use provisions and standards of COUNTY designations. Furthermore, the CITY agrees to maintain this designation for one year after the effective date of annexation unless both the CITY and the COUNTY Planning Directors agree at the time of annexation that the COUNTY designation is outdated and an amendment may be initiated before the one year period is over. 7. Washington County review,ed its role in service provision in i:s Countv 2000 program. This program essentially lays out a long range strategic and fiscal plan for the County. In this document, the County adopted a policy of supporting a service delivery system which distinguishes between municipal and county-wide services to achieve tax fairness and expenditure equity in the provision of public services. The County policy states that municipat services should be provided either by cities or special districts. 8. The Tigard Comprehensive Plan consists of the Resource Document (Volume I) and the Findinqs Policies & Imqlementation Strate4ies (Volume II). The Tigard Community Development Code and the Washington County-Tigard Urban Planning Area Agreement should also be considered a part of the Comprehensive Plan. The City of Tigard has a"city timits" plan. The County's plan and ordinances remain applicable unless the City takes other action after the annexation is effective. The following policies from Volume II of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan appear to be relevant to this proposal: Policy 7.1.1 THE CITY SHALL: Findings - Page 3 • • . Exhibit A • Proposal No. 3924 a. Prepare and implement a capital improvements program in conjunction with Washington County and the applicable service districts; b. Work with the service districts to provide a coordinated system for providing services; c. Provide urban services in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan to the extent of the City's financial resources; d. Use the Capital Improvements Program as a means for providing for orderly growth and the efficient use of land; e. Develop a Comprehensive Plan with consideration being given to the level and capacity of the existing services; and , f. Adopt locational criteria as the basis for making decisions about the property location for public facilities. POLICY 7.1.2 THE CITY SHALL REQUIRE AS A PRE-CONDITION TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THAT: a. Development coincide with the availability of adequate service capacity including: 1. Public water; 2. Public sewer shall be required for new development within the City unless the property involved is over 300 feet from a sewer line and Washington County Health Department approval for a private disposal system is obtained; and 3. Storm drainage. b. The Facilities are: 1. Capable of adequately serving all intervening properties and the proposed development; and 2. Designed to City standards. c. All new development utilities to be placed underground. PoliCy 10.1.1 PRIOR TO THE ANNEXATION OF LAND TO THE CITY OF TIGARD: Findings - Page 4 , . • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 a. The city shall review each of the following services as to adequate capacity, or such services to be made available, to serve the parcel if developed to the most intense use allowed, and will not significantly reduce the level of services available to developed and undeveloped land within the City of Tigard. The services are: 1. wafer; 2. sewer; 3. drainage; 4. streets; 5. police; and 6. fire protection. b. If required by an adopted capital improvements program ordinance, the applicant shall sign and record with Washington County a non- remonstrance agreement regarding the following: 1. The formation of a local improvement district (L.I.D.) for any of the following services that could be provided through such a dis- trict. The extension or improvement of the following: a) water; b) sewer; c) drainage; and d) streets. 2. The formation of a special district for any of the above services or the inclusion of the property into a special district for any of the above services. c. The City shall provide urban services to areas within the Tigard urban planning area or within the urban growth boundary upon annexation. Policy 10.1.2 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS OF LAND BY THE CITY SHALL BE BASED ON FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE FOLLOWING: a. The annexation eliminates an existing "pocket" or "island" of unincor- porated territory; or b. The annexation will not create an irregular boundary that makes it difficult for the police in an emergency situation to determine whether the parcel is within or outside the city; c. The police department has commented upon the annexation; Findings - Page 5 • • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 d. The land is located within the Tigard urban planning area and is contiguous to the city boundary; e. The annexation can be accommodated by the services listed in 10.1.1(a). . Policy 10.1.3 UPON ANNEXATION OF LAND INTO THE CITY WHICH CARRIES A WASHINGTON COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATION, THE CITY OF TIGARD SHALL ASSIGN THE CITY OF TfGARD ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATtON WHICH MOST CLOSELY CONFORMS TO THE COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATION. Policy 10.2.1 THE CITY SHALL NOT APPROVE THE EXTENSION OF CITY OR UNIFIED SEWERAGE (USA) LINES EXCEPT: a. Where applications for annexation for those properties have been _ submitted to the City; or b. Where a nonremonstrance agreement to annex those properties has been signed and recorded with Washington County and submitted to the City; or c. Where the applicable state or county health agency has declared that there is a potential or imminent health hazard. NThe pertinent Tigard Community Development Code sections appear to be Chapters 18.136, Annexations; and 18.138, Established/Developing Area Classification. Chapter 18.136 contains approval standards for the City Council when reviewing a proposed annexation prior to submission to the Boundary Commission. These standards are: A. The decision to approve, approve with modification, or deny an application to annex property to the City shall be based on the following criteria: 1. All services and facilities are available to the area and have sufficient capacity to provide service for the proposed annexation area; and 2. The applicable comprehensive plan policies and implementing ordinance provision have been satisfied. B. The plan designation and the zoning designation placed on ihe property shall be the City's zoning district which most closely implements the City's or County's comprehensive plan map designation. C. The determination of whether the property is an established area or a developing area will be based on the standards contained in Chapter 18.138. Findings - Page 6 ' ~ • Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 Chapter 138 provides standards for classifying all lands annexed to the City as either Established Area (unbuildable or essentially built-out) or Developing Area (buildable). The code requires that one of these two designations be applied to all land at the time of annexation. The City Council conducted a public hearing on the annexation and approved the annexation on June 9, 1998. > 9. There is an 8-inch City sewer located in SW Locust St. along the south edge of the territory to be annexed. The territory is within the Unified Sewerage Agency of Washington County as is the City. The Unified Sewerage Agency has a standard agreement between the Agency and the large cities within the Agency (Beaverton, Cornelius, Forest Grove, Hillsboro, Tigard, Tualatin and Sherwood). In that agreement the Cities agree to: 1> comply with the Agency's construction and maintenance standards for sanitary and storm water sewer facilities, 2) follow and accomplish the Agency's work program for storm and surface water, 3) obtain the Agency's consent before issuing construction permits within wetlands, floodways and floodplains. The agreement provides that the city owns and is responsible for sanitary sewer lines under 24 inches in diameter within the City limits and for storm water facilities within the City limits as identified on a map (virtually all facilities). The Unified Sewerage Agency is responsible for all industrial waste discharges, both in and out of cities. The Unified Sewerage Agency agrees not to extend sanitary sewer service to areas outside the City within the City's Urban Planning Area (as identified in the City- County UPAA) unless the City approves. The City is responsible for billing the customers after service is installed and for collecting sanitary and storm sewer connection fees. If the City imposes the same connection fees and user charges as U.S.A., it simply passes these monies on to U.S.A. to pay for the costs of treatment and transmission of the sewage or storm water. The City may impose higher costs than U.S.A. charges and keep the difference to offset City costs. Monthly sanitary sewer user charges are $15.30 per month qIUS a consumption charge of $1.386 per 100 cubic feet of water used by the customer. These City charges are the same as those charged by U.S.A.. 10. This property is already served water via an 8 inch Tualatin Valley Water District line located in SW Locust Street. The territory to be annexed to the City of Tigard lies within the Tualatin Valley Water District, in the area of the District formerly in the Metzger Water District. The City of Tigard and the Tualatin Valley Water District have an informal Findings - Page 7 • ! Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 agreement that territory in this area (Metzger) will not be withdrawn from the District upon annexation to the City until the Tigard Water Department is able to extend service to the annexed sites. The Tualatin Valley Water District serves primarily the northeastern portion of Washington County, bounded generally by Portland on the East, Tigard and Beaverton on the southeast and south, and Hillsboro to the West, and Skyline Drive to the North. As a result of a merger in 1991 the District includes territory previousty served by the Metzger Water District. The Tualatin Valley Water District purchases water from the City of Portland on a wholesale basis. The District owns 74.5 % of the Washington County Supply Line (WCSL), or approximately 44.7 MGD of the 60 MGD available. Tualatin Valley has 29.4 MGD of capacity available, on standby, from the City of Portland's Arlington and Burlingame standpipes. The share of this available to:the Metzger area is 7.4 MGD which would come from the Burlingame standpipe. The Joint Water Commission (JWC) provides some additional potential capacity to the Tualatin Valley Water District. The JWC is a partnership between Hillsboro, Forest Grove and Beaverton that enables each city or district member to opt into the water supply as needed. Treated water originating in the Tualatin River headwaters, Scoggins Reservoir, and the Trask River Dam is sold by the Commission to its members. The TVWD currently owns 6 MGD of capacity, and is committed to participation in an improvement project (the expansion of the Barney reservoir) which will provide an additional 12 MGD to the TVWD. Tualatin Valley Water District's total water source amount is currently 50.7 MGD. After the completion of the Barney reservoir, which supplies the JWC, that figure will be 62.7 MGD. The current water rates for the Tualatin Valley Water District are based on bi- monthly charges. A residential 3/4" meter is charged a base charge of $9.75 plus $1.19 per 100 cu. ft. (ccf) for the first 50 hundred cubic feet. Additional use is charged 52.00/ccf. The system development charge for a standard 3/4 inch meter is $2160 per equivalent residential unit (ERU). 11. Upon annexation to the City, the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the Washington County Enhanced Sheriff's Patrol District and the District's $ .6372 per thousand property tax will no longer be levied against the territory. The County Service District provides a level of service of .51 officers per 1000 population which in addition to the general County level of .43 officers per 1000 population means that the current level is .94 officers per 1000 population. Findings - Page 8 Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 Subsequent to annexation, the Tigard Police Department will provide police protection to the territory. Tigard provides a service level of 1.4 officers per thousand population. Emergency response in Tigard is under five minutes. 12. The territory is within the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District. Annexation will not affect this service because the City is in the District. 13. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Urban Road Maintenance District. Upon annexation the territory will be automatically withdrawn from the District and the District's levy of $.2458 per $1000 assessed value will no longer apply to the property. 14. The territory is within the boundary of the Washington County Vector Control District. Tigard is not a part of the District. Upon annexation, the territory will be autvmatically withdrawn from the unfunded Washington County Vector Control District. 15. The territory is within the Washington County Service District #1 for street lights. The District provides services to areas within its boundary which request street lighting services. The District uses locai improvement districts to finance the service. Upon annexation the territory wiil be automatically withdrawn from the District. The City provides street lighting service out of its Street tund which receives State shared gasoline tax revenues as its primary revenue source. 16. Tigard operates a park system funded through its tax base which finances the general fund. Tigard has 6 developed recreation park sites. 17. There are eleven public libraries in Washington County, nine of which are provided by cities, including Tigard. 18. The Unified Sewerage Agency levies an annual assessment for storm drainage services of $36 per dwelling unit of which $24 goes to the City. Findings - Page 9 ~ ~ . Exhibit A Proposal No. 3924 REASONS FOR DECISION Based on the Findings, the Commission determined: 1. The proposal is consistent with City, County, and Regional planning for the area. 2. The City can provide an adequate quantity and quality of public services to the area. 3. The proposal is consistent with the Boundary Commission Policy On Incorporated Status (OAR 193-05-005) and the Policy On Long Term/Long Range Governmental Structure (OAR 193-05-015). Findings - Page 10 ~ CI.ACKAMAS ~ • MULTNOMAH WASHINGTON '1' ► 1 METROPOLITAN A' ► 1 A GOVERNMENT :1 1A' 1 1 - 800 N.E. OREGON STREET #16 (SUITE 540) PORTLAND, OREGON 97232 PHONE: (503) 731 •4093 FAX: (503) 731 •8376 E-MAIL:pmalgbc@orednet.org July 27, 1998 City of Tigard Julie Hajduk 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 Ref.• 3924 Dear Sir/Madam: The Boundary Commission Statute, ORS 199.410 to 199.534 authorizes posting of , Public Hearing Notices within the area(s) to be annexed . In order to meet the requirements of ORS 199.463, they need to be posted by August 6. 1998. Therefore, we would appreciate your cooperation in posting 3 copies of the enclosed NOTICE OF HEARING and map. They should be placed in a manner reasonably calculated to be observed by the public. Also would you please send us an "AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING." Thank you. Kenneth S. Martin Executive Officer • KSM/Ihp Enclosures STAFF COMMISIONERS KENNETH S. MARTIN, Executive Officer RAY BARTEL, Chair ROBERT ENNINGA DENIECE WON, Executive Assistant TOM WHITfAKER, Vice-Chair MARILYNN HELZERMAN ALISA BRODHAY, Planner BOB BOUNEFF SY KORNBRODT LANA RULIEN, Administrative Assistant NATHALIE DARCY 1 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the Matter of the Proposed . STATE OF OREGON ) County of Washington ) ss. City of Tigard ) . ° being f irst duly sworn, cn oath depose and say: ~ That I-posted in the following public and conspicu us places, a copy of Notice of Public Hearing of the .„6.a!A1 3oaS -&s 3aau , a colly of said notice be~'}ng hereto a ttached and by reference made a part he eof: on the l0 day of 1WVMlS.)~_~ 19 N e of Person Who Perf ormed Posti.ng . S scribed and swarn to before me this _1L day of 19_y OFFICIAL SEAL Notary lic for O gon M JO ANN HAYES q NOTAAY PUBUC•OfiEGON M11 COIIllIIlS510I1 EXP1reS' YY1Qai Si t q q/ COMMISSION N0.042148 MIS510N EXPIRES AMY 05, 1999 effpost CITY OF TIGARD OREGON June 25, 1998 TO: Metro Area Boundary Commission FROM: Julia Hajduk, Associate Planner RE: Annexation application , We are submitting the enclosed forms and a checks for a city-initiated, double majority annexations. The files are: Tigard ZCA 98-0005 (6.38 acres), ZCA 98-0006 (1.63 acres) and ZCA 98-0007 (.11 acres). Please place this proposal on your next available agenda. If you have any questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me at 639-4171 x 407. Thank you in advance for your attention. 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 ~ • PMAL GBC FORM #6 BOUNDARY CHANGE DATA SHEET 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS IN AREA TO BE ANNEXED OR WITHDRAWN A. Land Area: Acres or Square Miles B. General description of territory. (Include topographic features such as slopes, vegetarion, drainage basins, floodplain areas, which are pertinent to this proposal). -~~L~7 ~'✓~%~L ~c~1~c~.vr~.~2 C. Describe land uses on sunounding parcels. Use tax lots as reference points. North: 7/171 ~ , /PF a6~701 1~65~X(42' e=* East: 7)4 451VI&I'L ~~~'f~ Slfz~ ~✓G( lLp/.~ ~ c~/~S A914 south: West: -Z?~Y 7~°'~"3, (L9~/ t 1~0lN'~ _ - D. Existing Land Use: Number of single-family units Number of multi-family units Number commercial structures Numbei industrial structures Pubiic faciIities or other uses What is the current use the land proposed to be an nexed: E. Total cunent year Assessed Valuation $ F. Total existing popularion ~ 11 Revised 11/93 . 0 • II. REASON FOR BOUNDARY CHANGE A. ORS 199.462 of the Boundary Commission Act states: "In order to carry out the purposes described in ORS 199.410 when reviewing a boundary change..., a boundary commission shall consider local comprehensive planning for the area, economic, demographic, sociological projections pertinent to the proposal, past and prospective physical developments of land that would directly or indirectly be affected by the proposed boundary change..." Considering these points, please provide the reasons the proposed boundary change should be made. Please be very specific. Use additional pages if necessary. (This information is often quoted in the Staff Report, so be thorough and comptete.) AW611-iy cA-" o Lwmo)~rv u"6< 5; r+lcz- 4war-f d4~ kc~r 666A.) u.&t-p ~ , " kdwv u,Ae, 915 ' B. If the property to be served is enrirely or substantially undeveloped, what are the plans for future development? Be specific. Describe type (residential, industrial, commercial, etc.), density, etc. ho0i-, 15 q X. LAND USE AND PLANNING A. Is the subject territory to be developed at this time? B. Generally describe the anticipated development (building types, faciliries, number of units). . &I'Vi A -rYK- B M- &MAW,144CP 6C ~ LN cV- ce~ si Dr nG) C. Is the subject territory inside or outside of the Metro Regional Urban Growth Boundary? l IY= 12 Revised 11/93 • ~ .c D. What is the applicable County PI ning signation? W614 H~i~M%~'1U1~ . or City Planning Designation Does the proposed development comply with applicable regional, county or city comprehensive plans? Please describe. 16S, AN06^011M 'D:*S MT c~~LA-r-. ~ ~Wl5cw► omb6L -tvtv~' -tttO56 2u.Lrs --IH* t' &X*V+r n1-e :2r,~ -tlD T L-jAV2JD N'C -&VV6- ~ ~WW"-r- Zvm ws6 ►s ,~~~r►~ ~ ~ s tle E. Wha~t is the zoning on the territory to e served? F. Can the proposed development be accomplished under current county zoning? ~ Yes v No If No,---has a zone change been sought from the county either formally or informally. ❑ Yes o No Please describe outcome of zone change request if answer to previous questions was Yes. 04 G. Is the proposed development compatible with the city's comprehensive land use plan for _ the area? X Yes ❑ No ❑ City has no Plan for the area. Has the proposed development been discussed either formally or informally with any of the following? (Please indicate) ❑ City Planning Commission ~ City Planning Staff o City Council ❑ Ciry Manager Please describe the reacrion to the proposed development from the persons or agencies above. indicatulnf v vr~ m .S ~ Taita. . - - 13 - - Revised 11/93 • • H. Please indicate all permits and/or approvals from a City, County, or Regional Government which will be needed for the proposed development. If already granted, please indicate date of approval and identifying number: APPROVAL PROTECT DATE OF FUTURE FII.E # APPROVAL REQUIREMENT Metro UGB Amendment City or County Plan Amendment Pre-Application Hearing (City or County) Preliminary Subdivision Approval Final Plat Approval Land Parrition Conditional Use Variance Sub-Surface Sewage Disposal Building Pecmit Please submit copies of proceedings relating to any of the above permits or approvals which are pertinent to the annexation. I. If a city and/or county-sanctioned cirizens' group exists in the area of the annexation, please list its name and address of a contact person. IV. SERIfICES AND UTILITIES A. Please indicate the following: 1. Location and size of nearest water line which can serve the subject area. ~j~~ Lp IA~Mt1L i'►'tA-l N 1~~-T~D ~ N 5, W./ OG(.~Sl- Sk. 14 Revised 11/93 • • 2. Location and size of nearest sewer line which can serve the sub*ect area. S6~ I,6 s. wI.-ou.c,sT~ 3. Proximity of other facilities (storm drains, fire engine companies, etc.) which can serve the subject area ~s~wt ~~I ~ Vnl, C~Jx-n~ r;~ ~~~~°~1• 4. The rime at which services can be reasonably provided by the city or district. fW~tL~ . niwJ ~ 5. The esrimated cost of extending such facilities and/or services and what is to be the method of financing. (Attach any supporting documents.) v 6. Availability of the desired service from any other unit of lo.cal government. (Please indicate the government.) N~,4 15 ' Revised 11/93 . • . B. If the territory described in the proposal is presently included within the boundaries of any of the following types of governmental units, please so indicate by stating the name or names of the governmental units involved. . City Rural Fire Dist County Service Dist. Sanitary District Hwy. Lighring Dist. Water District Grade School Dist. Drainage District High School Dist. Diking District Library Dist. Park & Rec. Dist. Special Road Dist. Other Dist. Supplying Water Service C. If any of the above units are presently servicing the territory (for instance, are residents in the territory hooked up to a public sewer or water system), please so describe. APPLICANT'S NAME MAILING ADDRESS WAj a'j 5. ' TELEPHONE NUMBER (Work) - G 77".' q 62 c7 (Res.) REPRESENTING DATE: 16 Revised 11/93 , , • • . PMALGBC FORM #I S , OREGON PETITIDN FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF Oregon TO: The Council of the City of We, the undersigned property owners of and/or registered voters in the area described below, hereby petition far, and give our consent to, annexarion of the area to the City of . If approved by the city, we further request that this peririon be forwarded to the Portland Metropolitan Area local Government Boundary Commission for the necessary procedures as prescribed by ORS 199.490(2). The proQerty to be annexed is described as follows: A tract of land situated in the NE'/. of the NE'/. of Section 35, Township 1South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point S89°30'W 60 ft from the Initial point of the TOWN OF METZGER as recorded in the records of Washington County; thence South $2.25 feet to the North right of way line of SW Locust Street; thence S$9 °30'W 31.10 ft; thence N0021'W _ 10.00 ft; thence S89 °36' W 47.59 ft; thence along a 1885.1 ft radius, non-tangent curve to the left (chord bears N24° 55'54" E, 79.77 ft) a distance of 79.78 ft; thence N89°30'E 48.36 ft to the point of beginning. 17 Revised 11i93 PETITION SIGNERS NOTE: This petition may be signed by qualified persons aven though they may not know their property description or precinct number. SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME 1 AM A:• ADDRESS PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PRECINCT # DATE PO RV OV LOT # 1/4 SEC. T R - ~ ~ st,. 35 ' PO = Property Owner RV = Registered Voter OV = Owner Voter i • PMALGBC FORM #16 CERTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP (Double Majority Method) I hereby certify that the attached petition for annexation of the territory described therein to the City of vG70-01,-) contains the names of the owners* of a majority of the land azea of the territory to be annexed, as shown on the last available complete assessment roll. NAME =E Administrative Specialist DEPARTMENT Assessment & Taxation, Cartoqraphy COUNTY OF Washington DATE 13 April 1998 * "Owner" means the owner of the title to real property or the contract purchaser of real property. PMALGBC FORM #17 ' CERTIFICATION OF REGISTERED VOTERS - I hereby certify that the attached petition for annexarion of territory described herein to the City of 77L7lhe,/7 contains the names of at least a majority of the electors registered in the territory to be annexed. ~~o C/~, NAME ~ h Y62~~ TITLE p e-fi"vl 9-&r' DEPARTMENT ~ f ~ C C COUNTY OF- ~J DATE 18 Revised 11/93 • • PMAL GB C FORM #4 CERTIFICATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MAP I hereby certify that the descriprion of the property included within the attached petition (located on Assessor's Map ~ 6-L :,XEAA TL #O0400 og() Z'7b `7W ) has been checked by me and it is a true and exact descriprion of the property under consideration, and the description corresponds to the attached map indicating the property under consideration. NAME TITLE Administrative Specialist DEPARTMENT Assessment & Taxation, Cartoqraphy COUNTY OF washington ' DATE 13 April 1998 19 Revised 11/93 ~ • PMALGBC FORM #19 (This form is NOT the petition) ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY AND/OR REGISTERED VOTERS INCLUDED IN BOUNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL AREA (To be completed IF the proposal contains 10 or fewer land owners/registered voters. Please indicate the name and address of all owners/voters regardless of whether they signed an annexarion petition or not.) This is for norification purposes. NAME OF OWNERNOTER ADDRESS PROPERTY DESIGNATION (Indicate tax lot, section number, Township and Range) (1) .-)kve vrl7v- 2ats sc~1 A'q/70~ "edG2 97z.01 /s/ 3S41 47T (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 20 Revised 11/93 ~ • PMALGBC FORM #19 (continued) (This form _is NOT the petition) _ ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY AND/OR REGISTERED VOTERS INCL UDED IN BO UNDARY CHANGE PROPOSAL AREA (To be completed IF the proposal contains 10 or fewer land owners/registered voters. Please indicate the name and address of all owners/voters regardless of whether they signed an annexation perition or not.) This is for notification purposes. NAME OF OWNERNOTER ADDRESS PROPERTY DESIGNATION (Indicate tax lot, section number, Township and Range) (g) (9) (10) 21 Revised 11/93 . , ~ PMALGBC FORM #20 DO UBLE MAJORITY WORK SHEET Please list all properrieslregistered voters included in the proposal. (Tf needed, use separate sheet for additional listings). PROPERTIES Property Assessed Signed Petition Designation Name of Owner Acres Value Yes No (Tax Lot #s) /s/ 3 sqR ~yo S~evc T r~- a ola r/ TOTALS 000 j 22 Revised 11193 ,V s • PMALGBC FORM #20 (continued) REGISTERED VOTERS ADDRESS OF REGISTERED NAME OF REGISTERED SIGNED PETITION Voter Voter Yes No o Te d M r n TOTALS SUMMARY TOTAL NUMBER REGISTERED VOTERS IN TBIE PROPOSAL ~ NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHO SIGNED O PERCENTAGE OF REGISTERED VOTERS WHO SIGNED C) TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROPOSAL ACREAGE SIGNED FOR a I ~ PERCENTAGE OF ACREAGE SIGNED FOR ~/"00% 23 Revised 11/93 zc4 71- o0r)7 , • • Agenda Item No. Meeting of TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JLJNE 9, 1998 • STUDY SESSION > Meeting was calied to order at 6:30 p.m, by Mayor Jim Nicoli > Council Present: Mayor Jim Nicoli, Councilors Paul Hunt, Brian Moore, Bob Rohlf, and Ken Scheckla. > Staff Present: City Manager Bill Monahan; Legal Counsel Tim Ramis; City Recorder Catherine Wheatley; Asst. to the City Manager Liz Newton; and Community Development Director Jim Hendryx. > EXECUTIVE SESSION The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 6:30 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), &(h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. > Executive Session adjourned to Study Session at 7:22 p.m. > FACILITIES PLANNING DISCUSSION > DOWNTOWN EFFORT UPDATE Bill Monahan, City Manager, reported that 19 people attended the last downtown meeting. Jim Hendryx, Community Development Director, said that the group intended to invite Livable Oregon to make a presentation to them in June/July, once they found meeting space. He explained that a new sub-branch of Livable Oregon, The Downtown Development Association, concentrated on rehab and revitalization of downtowns in. Oregon. He mentioned attending an • excellent conference on downtown revitalization last week. He stated that it was a privately funded organization Mr. Monahan noted that the Downtown Development Association would not get involved with a downtown unless there was a financial commitment from both the City and the downtown merchants. He commented that the downtown merchants at the meeting last week did not seem willing to invest financially yet. He mentioned concerns of several property owners regarding what would happen to their properties. He listed several merchants in attendance who would likely work throughout the process. Councilor Hunt asked if there had been concern regarding an Economic Investment District (EID). Mr. Monahan said that they informed the group that the City was not forming an EID. He explained that an EID was similar to an LID in reinvesting the tax revenues from the district back into the district. > CYBERCAFE UPDATE Mr. Monahan said that Chief Ron Goodpaster had written a letter regarding the Cybercafe application last September in which he said he saw no problem with it, based on the information CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 1 • he had at the time. He pointed out the confusion between the language in the application and 'the drawing on the map on exactly where the liquor would be served: the cafe and/or the antique shop. He reported that Community Development wrote a letter stating that any change in land use might require permits. Mr. Monahan said that Chief Goodpaster intended to modify the liquor license application process to include a Planning review. He pointed out that the Council changed the liquor license application process in 1987 to delegate it to the Police Chief, instead of reviewing the applications themselves. He commented that it did not matter who did the local review because the decision rested with the OLCC who usua(ly granted applications unless the operator had a bad record, the site was located in an area already overloaded with liquor establishments, or the local citizens protested. > Mayor Nicoli recessed the study sessio» at 7:30 p.m. 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council & Local Contract Review Board , Mayor Nicoli called the business meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. 1.3 Council Communications/Liaison Reports > Councilor Scheckla reported on meetings of the Metropolitan Area Communications Commission, Community Development Block Grant Committee, and the Housing Task Force. > Mayor Nicoli reported an opportunity for local jurisdictions to request that projects of concern to them in the MSTIP 3 be moved forward. He said that the main project of concern to Tigard was already moving forward, (the SW 1215' and Walnut intersection scheduled for completion by 2001). He said that he did not think that the Council wanted to request to move any projects forward but he wanted their input on the matter. He mentioned that they would have the same opportunity next year. Councilor Scheckla asked how many projects were left in Tigard. Mayor Nicoli said that Walnut Street was broken up into three segments with the intersection going first. Elsner Road, of interest to King City, Sherwood, Tigard and Beaverton, was already underway. Mr. Monahan confirmed that the small project at the intersection of Hall and Pacific was yet to come. He recommended asking the City Engineer to present an update on the MSTIP 3 projects on June 23 when he presented the CIP update. > Mr. Monahan noted the new agenda item, Council Liaison Reports, added at Council's request for the longer commission or liaison reports. 1.4 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. VISITOR'S AGENDA , 3. CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Councilor Scheckla, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to approve the Consent Agenda. CITY COLTNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 2 • • • Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes. 3.1 Approve Council Meeting Minutes: April 21, 1998 3.2 Receive and File: a. Tentative Agenda b. Council Calendar 3.3 Approve Resolution Appointing David Chapman to the Library Board and Lisa Incalcaterra to the Planning Commission- Resolution No. 98- 3.4 Local Contract Review Board a. Approve Contract for the Construction of SW 110`h and Park Street Storm Drainage Improvements to Wystan Brown Excavation b. Approve Contract for the Raw Water Monitoring Study to Montgomery Watson c. Approve Contract for Public Information Campaign on Long-Range Water Needs to Rockey Bowler 4. CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDiNG RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE Nadine Robinson, Administrative Service Manager, and Records Manager, presented the staff report on the staff request for adoption of OAR 166.200, the general reference retention schedule for cities in Oregon. She said that this would replace Tigard's special retention schedule, last approved in 1989. She reviewed the process used by the State Archive staff to develop the schedule, including the participation of Tigard staff member Dee Wise, Senior Records Information Specialist. Ms. Robinson stated that while the retention periods assigned were the minimum lengths necessary, the City could extend those for historical, legal, administrative, or financial reasons. She said that the benefit to the City was a reduction in the volume of records retained and clarification of retention periods for unscheduled series. She recommended adoption of the ordinance. Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Hunt, to adopt Ordinance 98-13. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. . ORDINANCE 98-13, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 248.030 OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE CLASSIFICATION AND RETENTION OF CITY RECORDS ADOPTING ADMINISTRATIVE RULES ANI} FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") 5. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - JOHNSON STREET/106TH DRIVE ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0005 (FLATTERS) . A request to annex 3.15 acres into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. Locations: 10585 SW Walnut; 12385, 12355, 12325, 12330 and 12440 SW 106"' Drive and 10530, 10490 and 10514 SW Johnson Drive. (WCTM 2S103AA, Tax Lots 01901, 01909, 01908, 01910, 01915 01914, and 01917). a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing. CITY COLJNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 3 • • • b. Declarations or Challenges Councilor Scheckla declared a site visit. c. Staff Report Mr. Hendryx introduced Julia Hujdak, Associate Planner, who handled these annexation requests. He mentioned that this issue came to Council six months ago with the sewer concerns on Johnson Street. He reported that during the standard staff process, seven property owners elected to join with the initial request to annex to receive sewer services, increasing the request to 3.15 acres. He noted the inclusion of the City-owned property purchased for the Walnut Street realignment, and some additional right-of-way. Mr. Hendryx said that all 17 parcels of land were developed with single family homes at County R-5 zoning (which would revert to City R-4.5 upon annexation). He noted the availability of sewer and water in the area and the lack of opposition from any applicable agency. He distributed the new ordinance that included the properties not listed in the original notice. Councilor Scheckla asked why the City did not annex these properties at the same time as another property in the area was annexed two years ago. Mr. Hendryx said that there was not interest in annexation at that time. d. Public Testimony Mayor Nicoli reviewed the hearing procedures and criteria. No one testified. e. Council Questions: None f. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing. g. Staff Recommendation Mr. Hendryx recommended approval of the annexation with the additional lots as specified on the revised ordinance and resolution. Councilor Scheckla asked if the Boundary Commission fee would be higher with the additional lots. Ms. Hujdak said that the Boundary Commission fee of $605 was the same for 2 to 10 acres. h. Council Deliberation Motion by Councilor Hiuit, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt Ordinance 98-14 The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE 98-14, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE, ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0005-JOHNSON STREET/106"HDRIVE ANNEXATION, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") CITY COLJNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 4 • • • Motion by Councilor Hunt, seconded by Councilor Scheckla, to adopt Resolution 98-28. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 98-28, A RESOLUTION 1NITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0005-JOHNSON STREET/106"H DRIVE ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A, AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED 1N EXHIBIT B. Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") 6. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - LEHMAN/92ND/CORAL STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-006 (PERRY) A request to annex five tax lots totaling 1.63 acres into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. Locations: 9225 and 9255 SW Coral Street, 9250 and 9314 SW Lehman Street and 9885 SW 92"d Avenue. (WCTM 1S126DC, Tax Lots 03000, 03001, 03002, 03900 and 03800). a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the public hearing. b. Declarations or Challenges Councilor Scheckla declared a site visit. c. Staff Report Mr. Hendryx presented the annexation request for 1.63 acres in the Metzger area (five parcels) in order to get city services. He said that ail lots were developed with single family homes with County R-5 zoning which would change to City R-4.5 zoning. He said that the properties had adequate access to facilities and services and no agencies made any objections. d. Public Testimony Mayor Nicoli read the hearing procedures and criteria. > Deanna Johnson, 9314 SW Lehman Street, asked if the property owners had to pay any fees. Ms. Hujdak said that the City has agreed to waive the City annexation fee because this area was not an active planning area; and the Boundary Commission fee has already been paid. At Councilor Scheckla's request, Ms. Hujdak read the property owners' names. e. Council Questions: None f. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing. g. Staff Recommendation Mr. Hendryx recommended approval of the annexation and subsequent rezone. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 5 • • • h. Council Deliberation Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Ordinance 98-15. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE 98-15, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE, ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0006- LEHMAN/92ND/CORAL STREET ANNEXATION, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes. Motion by Councilor Rohlf, seconded by Councilor Moore, to adopt Resolution 98-29. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 98-29, A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0006, LEHMAN/921''D/CORAL STREET ANNEXATION 1NT0 THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED "EXHIBIT A", AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN "EXHIBIT B." Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes. 7. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-JUDICIAL) - SITE NORTH OF SW LOCUST STREET AND WEST OF SW 87 H AVENUE ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-0007 (TURNER) A request to annex one tax lot totaling .11 acres into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from Washington County Neigliborhood Commerciai to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial. Location: north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87`n Avenue.* (WCTM 1S135AA26DC, Tax Lot 00400) a. Mayor Nicoli read the hearing title and opened the pubiic hearing. b. Declarations or Challenges Councilor Scheckla declared a site visit. c. Staff Report: Community Development Department Mr. Hendryx said that the applicant wished to annex this .11 acres o land into the city in order to get city services. He mentioned that the applicant did have some preliminary plans to develop the property but has not begun the City process. He noted the Neighborhood Commercial zoning. He said that no applicable agency had any comments. d. Public Testimony Mayor Nicoli read the hearing procedures and criteria. No one testified. CITY COLJNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 6 • • • e. Council Questions Councilor Rohlf asked why this property had Washington County Neighborhood Commercial zoning on it. Steve Turner, 2015 SW Canaan, Portland, explained that this site, underutilized for years and part of the original railroad right-of-way, was adjacent to commercial uses, including a grocery store and a small cabinet shop, and to a multi-family use. He said that it has been used as a gravel parking lot. f. Mayor Nicoli closed the public hearing. g. Staff Recommendation Mr. Hendryx recommended approval of the annexation and subsequent rezone. h. Council Deliberation: Ordinance No. 98-17 Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Scheckia, to adopt Ordinance 98-17. The City Recorder read the number and title of the ordinance. ORDINANCE 98-17, AN ORDINANCE ADOPTiNG FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE, ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0007- TURNER ANNEXATION, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion was approved by unanimous roll call vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes.") Motion by Councilor Moore, seconded by Councilor Rohlf, to adopt Resolution 98-30. The City Recorder read the number and title of the resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 98-30, A RESOLUTION INITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION ZCA 98-0007, TURNER STREET ANNEXATION 1NT0 THE CITY OF TIGARD AS DESCRIBED 1N THE ATTACHED "EXHIBIT A", AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN "EXHIBIT B." Motion was approved by unanimous voice vote of Council present. (Mayor Nicoli, Councilors Hunt, Moore, Rohlf and Scheckla voted "yes. 8. CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PARKING REQUIREMENTS Mr. Monahan mentioned the May 19 Council meeting discussion on the Chamber's proposal to use the City parking lot to meet their parking requirements. He said that the Council had indicated its willingness to discuss lease arrangements and asked the Chamber to submit the first draft of a(ease agreement. He reported that he and John Cook met last Thursday (staff received the draft agreement on Wednesday) to discuss Mr. Monahan's concerns. He noted his memo that raised questions regarding the agreement. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 7 • • Mr. Monahan said that, based on the May 19 meeting minutes, he found that the Council had indicated an interest in entering into a short=term lease that would allow the Chamber to proceed with its plan while the City reviewed the possibility of changing the parking regulations in the downtown. He mentioned that his primary question in his memo was whether or not the compensation proposed by the Chamber was in keeping with the Council's expectations. He noted that Mr. Cook had indicated the Chamber's willingness to talk about taking on some of the responsibilities for the parking lot but since Mr. Cook did not include that in the first draft, he felt uncomfortable confirming the draft and amendments as the final agreement form. Councilor Scheckla asked if the City Attorney had looked at this. Mr. Monahan said that he talked with an attorney in the City Attorney's office but did not ask him to review it because there were enough unanswered questions to warrant Council discussion of the matter. John Cook, Chamber of Commerce, said that he considered 99% of the points that he and Mr. Monahan hammered out during their meeting to be final. He spoke to Council discussing the "big picture" items and leaving the minor language changes to staff. Mr. Monahan said that Mr. Cook agreed to the suggested language he had proposed. Mr. Cook said that the major thing that Mr. Monahan had been concerned about was the request for reciprocal parking. He noted that staff found that reciprocal parking would not work in this situation. He suggested that in the Chamber's request, they simply substitute a$1 lease agreement for the reciprocal parking agreement. He said that the Chamber was still doing this for the good of the community and the downtown. . Councilor Nloore commented that this seemed a matter of rewriting the lease agreement per Mr. Monahan's and Mr. Cook's discussions, submitting it to the City Attorney's office for review, and returning with the final product to Council. Councilor Hunt expressed concern that requiring only a short-term lease for one-year would create problems if the Council decided not to change the parking ordinance: the Chamber would have a permit but not enough parking spaces to meet the Code. Mr. Monahan noted the question of whether or not the Council wanted to include a mechanism in the agreement to increase the lease rate beyond the one-year time period, should the parking ordinance not change. Councilor Hunt said that he opposed leasing the property to the Chamber because he saw it as giving the Chamber $100,000 at a time when the Council was trying to raise money for its own space expansion needs. He stated that he favored changing the parking ordinance so the Chamber could legally build on their site or selling the property to the Chamber. He held that the business people in the Chamber should have planned for adequate parking and not counted on the City parking spaces. He reiterated that he did not oppose selling the property but pointed out that the City could not guarantee that the Chamber would be the purchaser. Councilor Hunt said that (although he still opposed it) if they were going to do a lease, they should make it for a longer term and cancelable if the City changed the ordinance. He contended that the City would not force the Chamber out of its building when a one year lease term expired and the parking ordinance did not change. He said that at the end of a one year lease term, there were not any options. Councilor Scheckla commented that the City purchased this lot for parking for the downtown in general, not one property in particular. He expressed his concern that giving the property to the CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - NNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 8 • ~ • Chamber made it difficult to offer free parking in the downtown. Mr. Monahan concurred that the City had discussed using the property as a free parking lot when it was purchased. He noted that several merchants had suggested leasing the spaces in order to recoup costs but the City never committed to that suggestion. He mentioned that in April he heard the Council interest for the property as short-term free parking. Councilor Scheckla objected to the clause allowing an automatic renewal of the lease every two years, which would roll over to a new owner. He said that he could not support the agreement as written. Mr. Cook said that he and Mr. Monahan agreed that if the Chamber sold the building, the lease ended automatically. Mr. Monahan mentioned that the issue he had raised regarding the term length was a broader ability for the City to terminate the agreement than merely by sale of the building or default. He said that there remained•a lot of work to be done on the agreement. Councilor Scheckla expressed his concern about the Chamber charging for parking. Mr. Cook said that the agreement stated that the rent charged by the Chamber would go to the City. He reiterated that the Chamber wanted to have public parking. He said that they would not put up 10 "Chamber parking only" signs. Bob Olsen, Chamber Board member, pointed out that those involved in this project did not see it as narrowly focused on business interests but rather broadly intended for the community benefit. Counci(or Hunt spoke to including the whole parking lot in the deal, rather than splitting off 5 parking spaces to the City and 10 to the Chamber. Mr. Monahan agreed that there would be efficiency of maintenance in that arrangement. He reiterated the need for discussion on whether or not the Chamber wanted to offer to do maintenance and upkeep of the lot or landscaping. Councilor Hunt said that if the City leased this to the Chamber, the Chamber should be required to maintain it. Councilor Moore suggested that the Chamber compensate the City for the use of the lot by paying for construction and future maintenance costs or the City could simply lease the land to the Chamber and the Chamber build the parking lot. Mr. Cook said that the Chamber would maintain the lot. He concurred with Councilor Scheckla that everyone should be allowed to use the lot. Councilor Moore spoke to the lease amount issue. He said that if the Chamber was going to use the property, then there should be more than a token rent. He asked what "maintaining" the lot mean. Councilor Scheckla and Mayor Nicoli indicated that the money was not an issue to them. Councilor Rohlf commented that he saw this lease agreement as buying the City time to settle the issue of the downtown parking code while allowing the Chamber to proceed with their project. He suggested revisiting the whole issue at the end of the one year lease agreement. Mr. Monahan commented that placing the property under the control and maintenance of the Chamber would help with the land use application in which the City had to find that the Chamber had sufficient parking spaces. Councilor Hunt reiterated his prior request for a longer term lease with a cancellation option. He expressed his concern that a short term lease would put the Council and the Chamber in a bad spot if a Council did not want to extend the lease. Mayor Nicoli said that he did not care what the lease term length was but he did want to direct staffto proceed with the process. CITY COLJNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 9 ' • • Councilor Scheckla asked what the Chamber's timeline was for their project. Mr. Cook explained that this delay in the permitting process has set them behind by two months from the original start construction date of September 1. He mentioned that several committees working on the project would have to be restarted once they got around this obstacle. He noted that the Chamber had been trying for volunteer labor which was why they had thought to build from September to February. He said that they would still try to begin this September 1 but they might have to postpone it to next September. Councilor Scheckla asked if the Chamber's portion of the property could be used for temporary parking until they began construction. Mr. Monahan said that the City intended to build the City's parking lot this summer. He pointed out that because of the joint access, people would have to go through the City property to get to the Chamber property. Councilor Scheckla asked if the City's project could be delayed to coincide with the Chamber's project. Mr. Monahan said that staff had wanted to start as soon as possible in order to reduce the cost of the fencing. Councilors Hunt and Moore supported doing the project now. Mayor Nicoli concurred with Councilor Hunt that they should go for a lease term for longer than one year. He mentioned that with the downtown effort was getting offto a.slower start than hoped, and if the Chamber postponed its building until next year, then it would be better timing for the Council to revisit this issue in two years. Councilor Rohlf expressed concern over giving the Chamber a multiple year lease. He noted the energy currently generating in the downtown through the Dolan building and the Chamber project, energy that he felt could be capitalized on to build momentum to further the Council's vision for the downtown. He spoke to the City doing what it could to facilitate the Chamber's process. Mayor Nicoli agreed. Councilor Scheckla reiterated his question about using the Chamber land for parking. Mr. Hendryx said that according to the Code, a parking lot had to be paved. He said that people informally parking on the Chamber land was a Code enforcement issue that was pursued by the City on a complaint only basis. Councilor Hunt asked for an update on the status of the parking standards discussion. Mr. Hendryx reported that he forwarded a memo to the Chamber asking for discussion of parking standards revision by the downtown group but it did not come up at the last meeting. He would put it back on the agenda. Mr. Cook pointed out that if the Council agreed in theory with the agreement as hammered out by he and Mr. Monahan, then the Chamber could move forward with its pre-application conference and get its committees up and running. Mayor Nicoli summarized the Council direction as approval of the lease agreement with a two- year term with the understanding that the City would move forward with revising the downtown parking standards and the Chamber would maintain the entire parking lot and finalize the agreement for staff and City Attorney review. Mr. Monahan reviewed additional items as a two-year rollover at the end of the lease term, termination of the lease if the Code changed, renegotiation of the lease terms if the Code did not change, incorporation of his suggestions to which the Chamber has agreed, and incorporation of CITY COIJNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 10 • • ~ ' the City Attorney's suggestions to protect the City and clean up the language. Mr. Monahan asked the Council if they would approve an agreement with those terms on June 23. Mayor Nicoli and Councilor Moore said that they would. Councilor Scheckla reiterated his ~ concern that the agreement not automatically renew every two years. Mr. Monahan said that they could language to draft a one shot lease with re-evaluation at the end of the term. 9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS: None 10. NON AGENDA ITEMS: None 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Tigard City Council went into Executive Session at 8:50 p.m. under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (3), &(h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. > Mayor Nicoli reconvened the study session at 9:25 p.m. • Balloon Festival Councilor Moore reported that Bruce Ellis has indicated that he might retire as the Event Chairperson of the Balloon Festival. The Council discussed the matter. The Council agreed that the Mayor and a Council member would visit with Mr. Ellis concerning his future plans, once this year's event was over. City Facilities Planning , The Council briefly discussed the next step in the process and the size and scope of the measure that would be presented to the voters. The Council agreed by consensus to revise next week's agenda. 12. ADJOURNMENT: 9:40 p.m. , Att Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder ayor, Citf of Tiga Date: I ~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 11 • AGENDA AM ~ ~ FOR AGENDA OF: June 9,1998 - 7:30 PM CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ISSUE/AGENDA TITLE_ Zone Change Annexation (ZCA) 98-0007 - Turner Annexation PREPARED BY: Julia Powell Ha'duk DEPT HEAD OK D ~ r CITY MGR OK ISSUE BEFORE THE COUNCIL Should the Tigard City Council forward to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission a request to initiate annexation of one (1) parcel consisting of .11 acres located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue? STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Resolution and forward the request for annexation to the Boundary Commission and adopt the attached Ordinance to assign Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations to the subject property in conformance with the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. INFORMATION SUMMARY The proposed annexation consists of tenitory comprised of one (1) tax lot of .11 acres which is contiguous to the City of Tigard. The property is currently vacant. The owner wishes to annex in order to develop the property and receive city services. Attached is a Resolution initiating annexation and an Ordinance to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zonin- Designation from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial to the City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 1. Deny the request. VISION TASK FORCE GOAL AND ACTION COMMITTEE STRATEGY This request is consistent with Growth & Management "Goal 2." FISCAL NOTES Since the subject territory is not within the City of Tigard's Active Planning Area, the City is not responsible for paying the Boundary Commission application fee, therefore, there is no fiscal impact. COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY i:\citywide\sum\zca98-07.sum Page 1 of 1 ]ulia P H 21-May-98 3:10 PM V~ • • Agenda item: Hearing Date: June 9.1998 7:30 PM , . . . . . , . . 5 STAFF REPORT ~TO TNE . . ~ - ' . ; . ..CITY COUNCIL . ' ~CRYOFTIOARD CommwriajDcvefopment . . . JFOR TNE~CITY OF.TIGARD;:OREGON-~~ - 0ap! VA*uaSECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE: FILE NAME: TURNER ANNEXATION Zone Change Annexation ZCA 98-0007 PROPOSAL: To annex one (1) lot consisting of .11 acres of un-incorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial, C-N. APPLICANT: Steven Turner OWNERS: Various Owners 2015 SW Kanan Street (List Available Portland, OR 97201 Upon Request) . CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. RECOMMENDED ZONING DESIGNATION: It is recommended that the City of Tigard Zoning Designation of Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) be designated upon annexation as this designation most closely conforms to the County's current designation. LOCATION: The subject parcel is located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Sections 18.136 and 18.138. SECTION II. STAFF RECOMMENDATION . . . Staff `recommends that the Council.find that the proposed. annezatio"m.:wiq` not:adversely-": _ affect the health, safety and welfare.of: the City. _ Therefore, staff,recommends . _ APPROVAL of the annexation by. adoption..of. the attached Re`solution :anc~ Orcfinance... 4 ~ STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 1 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 619/98 PUBLIC HEAFiING • • SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATfON Site Historv: The property is currently vacant. The owner of the lot wishes to annex in order to develop the property and receive city services. No development proposal has been formally proposed, nor has the appficant scheduled a pre-application meeting. Vicinity Information: The area to be annexed is .11 acres. The existing city boundary runs along the southem portion of this property, along SW Locust Street. The site and the property to the north, east and west are within Tigard's Area of Interest but outside of the Tigard city limits. The properties to the north, east and west are outside city limits and zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) and the property to the south is inside the city limits and zoned R-12. Site Information and Proposal Description: The proposal is to annex into the City of Tigard in order to develop the property 'and obtain City services. The applicant has requested that the .11 acre site be annexed into the City of Tigard by means of the double-majority method. Representing the owners of more than half of the land (100%) and a majority of the registered electors (100%) of the area proposed to be annexed, the applicant has initiated this action through the written consent of the property owner. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERtA AND FINDINGS The relevant criteria in this case are Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Chapters 18.136 and 18.138. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant policies of the Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: Policv 2.1.1: This Policy requires an ongoing citizen involvement program and is satisfied because the East ClT and surrounding property owners have been notified of the public hearing and notice of the hearing has been published in a newspaper of general circulation. Policy 10.1.1: This Policy requires adequate service capacity delivery to annexed parcels and is satisfied because the City of Tigard Police, Engineering and Water Departments, Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) and Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue (NF&R) have all reviewed the annexation request and have offered no objections. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATIQN 619/98 PUBt1C HEAR{IVG . • • Policy 10.1.2: This Policy pertains to boundary criteria for annexations and is satisfied. The property is adjacent to property on the south that is inside the Tigard city limits. The affected land is located within the City's Urban Services Area (Area of Interest) and is contiguous to the city boundary. Adequate services are also available to accommodate the properties. The Police Department has been notified of this request and has no objections, however, they have requested that all properties east and west of the property be offered the option to annex in efforts to provide consistency in addressing and to reduce confusion to emergency service providers. Staff has sent letters to the property owners directly east and west of the site. If they wish to annex, the attached City Council Ordinance and Resolution can be amended . accordingly. Staff has determined that the proposal is consistent with the relevant portions of the Community Development Code based on the following findings: Section 18.136.030: This Section addresses approval standards for annexation proposals and is satisfied because: The applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Community Development Code provisions have been reviewed and satisfied as previously indicated in this report. The City of Tigard zoning designation of Neighborhood Commercial most closely conforms to the County designation of the same classification. This also satisfies Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.1.3. The determination that the affected property is an established area is based on the standards set forth in Chapter 18.138 of the Tigard Community Development Code and OAR 660-007-0005. Section 18.138: This Section provides standards for the classification of annexed land and is satisfied because: . The affected property meets the definition of an -established area and shall be designated as such. SECTION V. OTHER STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Engineering, Public Works, Police and Water Departments have all reviewed this proposal and have offered no comments or objections. STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 3 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION 619/98 PUBLIC HEARING • • , SECTION V{. AGENCY COMMENTS The Metro Area Boundary Commission, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District, Unified Sewerage Agency, Columbia Cable, Metro Area Communications, TCI, Tualatin Valley Water District, PGE, NW Natural Gas, US West Communications, GTE, and Washington County have had the opportunity to review the proposal and have offered no objections. BASED ON. THE FINDINGS INDICATED'ABOVE; PLANNING STAFF. • RECOMMENDS AP,PROVAL,OF ZONE" CHANGE.ANNEXATION"~::: . (ZCA) 98-0007 TURNER; ANNEXATION.>' .-4-. , Mav 21, 1998 PREPARED BY,: Julia Powe{I Majduk DATE Associate Planner r.~ Mav 21. 1998 _ ~-'Ztv ; APPROVED BY: Richard Bewer o DATE Planning Manager i:\curplnyulia\annex\zca98-07.doc a STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4 OF 4 ZCA 98-0007 - TUFlNER ANNEXATION 6l9l98 PUBLIC HEARING • i CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTIOIY INITIATING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0007 - TURNER ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TIGARD A5 DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED "EXHIBIT A" AND FURTHER ILLUSTRATED IN "EXHIBIT B" WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 9, 1998 to consider the annexation of one (1) tax lot consisting of .11 acres located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation constitutes a minor boundary change under Boundary Commission Law ORS 199.410 to 199.519; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council is authorized by ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B) to initiate an annexation upon receiving consent in writing from a majority of the electors registered in the territory proposed to be annexed and written consent from owners of more than half of the land in the territory proposed to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the property which currently lies within the boundary of the Washington County Enhanced Sheriffs Patrol District, Washington County Urban Roads Maintenance District, Washington County Street Lighting District #1 and the Washington County Vector Control District would, by operation of ORS 199.510, be automatically and immediately withdrawn from those districts upon completion of the annexation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL THAT: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council, pursuant to ORS 199.490(2)(a)(B), hereby initiates proceedings for annexation into the City of Tigard, the territory described in the attached "Exhibit A" and further illustrated in "Exhibit B". SECTION 2: The City Recorder is hereby directed to file certified copies of the Resolution with the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission at once. PASSED: This day of , 1998. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder - City of Tigard Date RESOLUTION NO. 98- i:kitywideUes\zca98-07.res Page l of 1 Julia P H 21-May-98 3:22 PM . CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS TO APPROVE A ZONE CHANGE (ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION (ZCA) 98-0007-TURNER ANNEXATION AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on June 9, 1998 to consider a zoning designation for one (1) parcel consisting of .11 acres located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; and WHEREAS, on June 9, 1998 the Tigard City Council approved a Resolution to forward the proposed annexation to the Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission; and WHEREAS, the zoning district designation recommended by Planning Staff, as set forth in the attached staff report and in Section 1 below, is that which most closely approximates the Washington County land use designation of Neighborhood Commercial while implementing the City of Tigazd's existing Comprehensive Plan Designation of Neighborhood Commercial (C-N). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Upon annexation, the affected properties shall be designated as follows: Tax Man/Lot Numbers 1 S 135AA, Tax Lot 00400 Current Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning Wa. Co. Neighborhood Commercial New Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) SECTION 2: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the Council, signature by the Mayor and posting by the City Recorder. PASSED: By vote of all Council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of 91998. Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of , 1998. James Nicoli, Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE NO. 98- i:kirywide\ord\zca98-07.ord Page 1 of 1 Julia P H 21-May-98 3:22 PM ExHzBiT A ZCA 98-0007 'furner Annexation Legal Description: A tract of land situated in the NE `I< ofthe NE'/, oFSection 35, Township 1South, RanLe l West, ot'the Willamette L'vIeridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oreaon, more particularly described as follows: 'Beginning at a point S89°30'W 60 ft from the Initial point of the TOWN OE METZGER as recorded in the records ot Washington County; thence South 32.25 feet to the North right ot way line of SW Locust Street; thence S89'34' W 31.10 ft; thence N0°? 1' W 10.00 ft; thence S89 °36'W 47.59 ft; thence along a 1885.1 tt mdius, non-tangent curve to the left (chord bears N24° 55;'54" E, 79.77 ft) a distance of 79.73 ft; thence N89030'E 43.36 ft to the point of beginning. - - - - - - - - CITY o . 0I00RA►NIC IN►011YA710N IYOTIY • . $T :~A;:: ~ CQ►~ ` VIClNITY MAP ~ ~ , i~~ ~ ~ Q~ O ~ CD °z SUBJECT O o PAI BE ANCNEXE ~ ~ ~ ZCA 98"OOOT ' sT ~ Turner Annexation . ? r. ; ~ " + sT > •t y t' Q LOCUST . ~ ~ M ~ ' 3, i ' ~ i~ A 1~~'Si~, t •S • ~ `~Yl+ `T LELEAF ST. 41 r ~a :1 ~ ~,+~f F .~.x. ♦ ~ ~'v. ~ ~ ~ Z F .'y~~ i `f M ,f ~ ~ ~ y.V.~~ : ♦ ; ~ ~ i MAPLELEAF ~r tt h i ~i4 'i e t>*'• rl t j i~: ~s~~~~ s•gi . , Z it „ ~.t: ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 - S ?L~~F~'~r•Yi:?• ;.r:~ } ~'^~Fp' _3? ~i 4~ ti k ~i } 3 , i a } -2'~~ ~ ~s~"t ~Zx'S~ lt `S~f > FI ~ i ~ i~` t•. . ( IS 3 ~ NG~ bi< ~fP w :'2.• :r . f. ~ o~ ~ ~ + - . ' : ~ • ! K k . ;n , ti:•, ~ ~ *..r'~, ~"~.iF Yqe A n { ?~t~ Q3 C, • . P '!'E~"' N . a ;r , i, ~ . ` ,4 ~~~p' S ~ 3 `ek F 'r ~ f ~ ~ • `~s ~ . ~y'+~ i~~ 0 100 200 300 100 600 FMt ~ ~ ` ' , ~ 4 . ~ ~ • f r• »e rw ;.iiN: . i . . ' ::.}:4~ . ; ~i s: : t~ *c ~t , : '~a' '.z City oFTigerd ~L, ~fi F.:..::; _ ' ;;:J,• .Y <..r;' • ~ ' . c. Y.. . . •`;i~ " Y? i YdamwEm m WsrtWp b fa pew! bc~tla~ My W dwla a r.+nea M1m e» o.wkQnrr s.rvlo.. oMslm. . . ; . U125SW FW BNd . : . , ; . . ~ ~ 8722 . . SRRUCE . . . . , . . . ~ . . ; . . ; . (503)6394M ' _i. . - ~ - • ~ ' ~ - - - IrttDlMww d Optrd a w _ . . - - ~ COfqt{~p ~NL10pIDCEt - flat QIIC Mlp 11. 1998: CWjk1w&CLIpr . . ~ • ~ ,r...:.,>~,::<,::: ;+cv;'r:. .r •:..::3<c..}~ m:~ ~ %:n'y,•,,.yn:};'2ye•+yS,"r:::;•::::.:.~} ~ ~p , I . ~i H.Bi:~Y' 9 x;. li; >;cf,.rF,+.,o,N{.3~;:k:%~'i.' l!,•.'•;u.,'»fi};•,r.': y~'~/ ~~r,n i ~1xk.•t ,rtwir: ~:•:~rr:::,+>;,+;:<:.;Yi%j9/.✓!~::;;+:i;:;o.<.'•;cq;$i;f;c:•y,n:;•f; :i:::.r;•::<:•`•:;:.~.:x:.:+d'%.'r,•,'•i;`.'•~~>y;:::y;•':;f::;; X00~TlPE~CITY OF TIGARD ...,:3~...,h+.'..r:2,>7:u,w•..~::~'1.•:i.•:!~!f?#G:•:~?»:.' r..;{l•:.;;'l'fl/r. . ~~)/~yyy/;+,...•¢~i%~i :;~r•;. ; • ' f . :r r;~l ~•}.i~~ve;i~i'.y~:^'";``•!',.„.{.,;1 "1£, . ' v,v••/~,`.'.'Yi ,r,~„w vt' ~.:~~'t;%.:Y!b;'r"•S/i!!,x.;c::.:. , ::y!Yk; •:.•:;rf:•'/y~$XO:yL!!L • • f~/;' ,,.'<y' . . .:,'jk• ~/'j..~~ f,'iiyyt~.~(.• <yM~ 1,~'• f>~X~Mf'~•-'IF J~~%iM~~l'I~% I!!e ~r~v~+E. J' 'x{$ H' iCMl.{'Yr:~f~f%%~.' :!.Fe::.M.:a • ~f//`.;iY •~.',~/'r?i~ ^~"?k8~!% ~ i.:3 ~r :;3... 1~'~'• %Ly~/~9r%~ ff••' i• ~~:,~N :•.r , r,:.,": y . y~; A~r . ~ Y,;' r !{~::;:'.'u,~v f:X,y~i•:h.>::~'? :'2~~ k .i,.. ~ . . a, .c PUBLIC NOTICE: Anyone wishing to speak on an agenda item should sign on the appropriate sign-up sheet(s). If no sheet is available, ask to be recognized by the Mayor at the beginning of that agenda item. Visitor's Agenda items are asked to be two minutes or less. Longer matters can be set for a future Agenda by contacting either the Mayor or the City Manager. Times noted are estimated; it is recommended that persons interested in testifying be present by 7:15 p.m. to sign in on the testimony sign-in sheet Business aqenda items can be heard in any order after 7•30 p m Assertive Listening Devices are available for persons with impaired hearing and should be scheduled for Council meetings by noon on the Monday prior to the Council meeting. Please call 639-4171, Ext 309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deafl. Upon request, the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduted with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting date at the same phone numbers as listed above: 639-4171, x309 (voice) or 684-2772 (TDD - Telecommunications Devices for the Deafl. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 9, 1998 - PAGE 1 ~ • AGENDA T{GARD C1TY COUNCiL BUSiNESS MEETING JUNE 9,1998 - 6:30 PM 6:30 PM • STUDY SESSION > EXECUTfVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council wiil go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those presenk Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. > FACILITIES PLANNING DISCUSSION > DOWNTOWN EFFORT UPDATE > CYBERCAFE UPDATE 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING 1.1 Call to Order - City Council and Local Contract Review Board 1.2 Roll Cail 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance 1.4 Council CommunicationslLiaison Reports 1.5 Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 7:35 PM 2. VfSITOR'S AGENDA (Two Minutes or Less, Please) 3. CONSENT AGENDA: These items are considered to be routine and may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Anyone may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. Motion to: . 3.1 Approve Council Meeting Minutes: April 21,1998 3.2 Receive and File: a. Tentative Agenda b. Council Calendar COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 911998 - PAGE 2 0 • 3.3 Approve Resolution Appointing David Chapman to the Library Board and Lisa Incalcaterra to the Planning Commission- Resolution No. 98- 3.4 Local Contract Review Board a. Approve Contract for the Construction of SW 110th & Park Street Storm Drainage Improvements to Wystan Brown Excavation b. Approve Contract for the Raw Water Monitoring Study to Montgomery Watson c. Approve Contract for Public Information Campaign on Long-Range Water Needs to Rockey Bowler • Consent Agenda -/tems Removed for Separate Discussion: Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion wil/ be considered immediate/y after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE . • Staff Report: Finance Department • Council Questions/Discussion • Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 98- 5. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-IUDICIAL) - JOHNSON STREET/106TH DRIVE ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-005 (FLATTERS) A request to annex 3.15 acres into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. Locations: 10585 SW Walnut; 12385, 12355, 12325, 12330 and 12440 SW 106th Drive and 10530, 10490 and 10515 SW Johnson Drive. (WCTM 2S103AA, Tax Lots 01901, 01909, 01908, 01910, 01915, 01914 and 01917). a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges c. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony (Applicant, Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) e. Council Questions f. Close Public Hearing .g. Staff Recommendation , .h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 98- COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 99 1998 - PAGE 3 . 6. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI,IUDICIAL) - LEHMAN/92ND/CORAL STREET ANNEXATION - ZCA 98-006 (PERRY) A request to annex five tax lots totaling 1.63 acres into the City of Tigard and change the zoning from Washington County R-5 to City of Tigard R-4.5. Locations: 9225 and 9255 SW Coral Street, 9250 and 9314 SW Lehman Street and 9885 SW 92nd Avenue. (WCTM 1 S126DC, Tax Lots 03000, 03001, 03002, 03900 and 03800). a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges c. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony (Applicant, Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) e. Council Questions f. Close Public Hearing g. Staff Recommendation h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 98- 7. PUBLIC HEARING (QUASI-,IUDICIAL) - SITE NORTH OF SW LOCUST STREET AND WEST OF SW 87TH AVENUE ANNEXATION - ZCA 980007 (TURNER) A request to annex one tax lot consisting of .11 acres into the City of Tigard and change the zoning ftom Washington County Neighborhood Commercial to the City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial; C-N. Location: north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue. (WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400). a. Open Public Hearing b. Declarations or Challenges c. Staff Report: Community Development Department d. Public Testimony (Applicant, Proponents, Opponents, Rebuttal) e. Council Questions f. Close Public Hearing g. Staff Recommendation h. Council Consideration: Ordinance No. 98- 8. CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PARKING REQUIREMENTS • Staff Update: Administration Department • Chamber of Commerce Information: Chamber Representative • Council Discussion, Consideration of Options and Direction to Staff 9. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 911998 - PAGE 4 • • • 10. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192.660 (1) (d), (e), & (h) to discuss labor relations, real property transactions, current and pending litigation issues. As you are aware, all discussions within this session are confidential; therefore nothing from this meeting may be disclosed by those present Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend this session, but must not disclose any information discussed during this session. 12. ADJOURNMENT i:ladmkathy\cca1980609.doc COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 911998 - PAGE 5 City Council Presentation Description of Proposal: The applicant has requested to annex .11 acres of land into the City limits. There is 1 parcel of land involved in this proposal. The owner wishes to annex into the City to receive urban services and has preliminary plans to develop the property. No applications have been filed, nor has a pre-application meeting been held. The property is currently zoned Neighborhood Commercial (N-C) and will be designated Neighborhood Commercial after the annexation. The site is adjacent to the City limits to the south and is in the Area of Interest. Facilities and services. Sewer is availabe from an 8-inch line in SW Locust Street and has adequate capacity to serve this site. Agency Review and Comments Staff submitted the annexation proposal to: the Engineering Department, the Police Department, Water Department and Public Works. Staff also sent request for comments to the METRO Area Boundary Commission, Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, General Telephone, NW Natural gas, PGE, and US West None of the agencies who received notice had any objections to the proposal. Staff Recommendation Based on findings by staff discussed in the staff report and because there have been no objections to the proposal by City Departments or other affected agencies, staff recommends that the City Council approve ZCA 98-0007 by passing the resolution and ordinance attached to your packets. ~ 1,99 ; , 7 ~ - - _ ~ Exhibit A A tract of land situated in the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 oF Section 35, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point S89°30' W 60 ft from the Initial point of the TOWN OF METZGER as recorded in the records of Washington County; thence South 82.25 feet to the North right of way line of SW Locust Street; thence S89 °30' W 31.10 ft; thence NO°21' W 10.00 ft; thence S89 °36' W 47.59 ft; thence along a 1885.1 ft radius, non-tangent curve to the left (chord bears N24° 55'54" E, 79.77 ft) a distance of 79.78 ft; thence N89°30'E 48.36 ft to the point of beginnirig. Amkk CITY OF TIGARD OREGON May 19, 1998 Martin and Joan Johansson 8290 SW Landau Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. And Mrs. Johansson The City of Tigard is processing an annexation request for your neighbor on SW Locust Street northwest of SW 87th Street (WCTM 1 S135AA, tax lot 400). As part of our standard, request for comments, the Tigard Police has asked us to contact you to see if you would be interested in being included in this annexation proposal. The reason for . their request is tq create a more uniform boundary line, thus reducing the chance of delay in providing emergency service in this area. In addition you would, of course, be able to receive City services. If you are interested in being included in this annexation, please fill out the enclosed forms NO LATER THAN JUNE 2, 1998. I realize this is short notice, however, a response is needed by this date in order to prepare the necessary changes for the City Council meeting on June 9, 1998. If you have questions regarding this letter or the Tumer Annexation (ZCA98-0007), please feel free to contact me at 639-4171 x407. Sincerely, . ~ Julia Powell Hajduk Associate Planner i:lcurp1nyu1ialzca1et6.doc c: Jim Wolf, Tigard Police Department : 1998 Planning correspondence file ZCA 98-07 land use file 13125 SW Hal! Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 f IdML ~ CITY OF TiGARD OREGON May 19, 1998 Joseph Weston 2154 NE Broadway Portland, OR 97232 . Dear Mr. Weston: The City of Tigard is processing an annexation request for your neighbor on SW Locust Street northwest of SW 87th Street (WCTM 1 S135AA, tax lot 400). As part of our standard request for comments, the Tigard Police has asked us to contact you to see if you would be interested in being included in this annexation proposal. . The reason for their request is to create a more uniform boundary line, thus reducing the chance of delay in providing emergency service in this area. In addition you would, of course, be able to receive City services. If you are interested in being included in this annexation, please fill out the enclosed forms NO LATER THAN JUNE 2, 1998. I realize this is short notice, however, a . response is needed by this date in order to prepare the necessary changes for the City Council meeting on June 9, 1998. If you have questions regarding this letter or the Tumer Annexation (ZCA98-0007), please feel free to contact me at 639-4171 x407. Sincerely, Julia Powell Hajd Associate Planner i:\curp1nyu1ia\zca1et7.doc c: Jim Wolf, Tigard Police Department 1998 Planning correspondence file ZCA 98-07 land use file 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639,4171 TDD (503) 684-2772 , zcA 9'9-cO07 ~ • Tvn~ ~9~.~~t9~h : Exhibit A A tract of land situated in the NE '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 3 5, Township 1 South, Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian, in the County of Washington and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point S89°30'W 60 ft from the Initial point of the TOWN OF METZGER as recorded in the records of Washington County; thence South 82.25 feet to the North right of way line of SW Locust Street; thence S89 °30'W 31.10 ft; thence NO°21'W 10.00 ft; thence S89 °36'W 47.59 ft; thence along a 1885.1 ft radius, non-tangent curve to the left (chord bears N24° 55'54" E, 79.77 ft) a distance of 79.78 ft; thence N89°30'E 48.36 ft to the point of beginning. OGG mHr ~ NE I/4 NEI/4 SEC`~10 35 TIS R I W WM, ~ IS I 26DD (S f 35AA ~ •~///../~i i /////%i%// ~ii;:7/%i%//r{'/%'/r%///,"'i~i%/,i7//.-;%iiii:.,ii.,:;,^T;,".',7'.';;~,"~~ • WASHING70N CO TY OREGON I ROAD VACATED 467/359 i ' -7 194.16' T ~ r 190•3SCALE (~~=100' 1 I .I • 35 , 36 IOZ CANCELLED TA% LOTS 601,303,304,3706, 225N/L ~ 100, 101, 300, 2701,1300, - - Z3o~' 501,310 o, zool, 30! SE E M A'P 40 - I ^ I S I 26DD I 22 ~ -60 2 E A S T I m - ia ~ 84.16 INITIAI/ IP04NT 305 1TOWN OF MET20ER N I 200 N 39 z ~ 064:~ ; 44.16 7lJAM~ I C-T to (v{ N ~ .16 NC. y 9C64/269 400 ' 302 p n c ~ SO'$0.~ 60~ b0~ 60' 6' DO' 0' SO e?.5393 "I 50, 70I~ 1/AC.r..d i~o `903 I ~ 9001 1 I 8OZ95~ 0 803 i i so a ~C q,'5 m 'o o m oo ~ . , `'s 154.e2 p I I ~ oI Ip I ~ ~ I o~ L~j l3l.l L 80.18607 g 6 /190.3, I _I n • I -i O 1 ~ ~ I n I~ I n I IS89~30' W ~9 \ \ n 14_ I 13 2 ° , _ ~ ~ S W L CUST STREET ~ n 904 ~ Q 804 i 0 Z r ioo' it 7.4' 194.16 erios9e ~ M ez-tse~i W r~ i~ 1 I ~J irs.z~ ~ I12 iso I 121 iao tl 0 600 500 so' 1400 °t601 ¢1~ so' Q - - - - - - - --I -C - - - _ ~ .B2A~ 781500 605 ' ~ „ . ~ W to o ~ 902 14 ~ I 6(C.S.N010836) ~ ~ ~ ~ p~ N d1 I6 I 1( IIS n 1. ~ n ~ _ 4 -T - m ~L. e o I600 f ~ no N o I 806 I - m - rl ~ P. I I m W n ~ M a 901 ~ I ~ J I f •ol a~ 800 ~ 1602 W o I ~ 102. 2A° W M 7 50' JB 60_ L 60: 1~050'_ ~ L 60' 60^ 10 37 > 36 p z ~50~ ,lIB.' ~ 1900 1901 ~ p 1800 I Oi ~ .1d00 590 I l.IOAC. O~' 1S0010 506,0' r 50~ I r60 ~ 60T 933' 23-64. / ; a 101.3 B9 ~ ~ C N~ Z C.S.10107 w {702 1700 ~ ~\~1 ~ ~ l ~ ► o ~n ~ , r' =r'cs, 1057e r ~ I 2OI n OO Z ~ ~ ms+O 4. 13 - 2 30 40 I 100' 0 IOOr I ~00_148.T6' 367.26' I 4.16' 5 190.3, 6 1 90 3' .5 g 12 rl _i `at~~- y.~A?ktr- R,o 7.e-„2 « 4141 ~HPLELEAF STREET m 3 9.7, , 6 ~II r7 nl ~ 9 401 Idr JO SEE MAP ; zOOO ~194.16' 2100 190.3 2200 190.3' - - o - ~ - - - ~ x .27Ac ~ IS I 35AA ` .eSAc. 0 2202 ' N SUPPLEMENTAL ~ m j n N~. ~ 3,) 1102 ! 101100 I 200 NI m t~ ' . _ o qS,10138 t m 12S ~ 50 08' 100' 9 53. 8 142.7' 760' 2201 W/.u.uau.. , 7 , VOW • ~i~~~~~/. ~ J m .G Po. 4200 / 39~~ ~~3800ia~.ei 3707 129.01 r-- ~ 1 38 ~ 39 ~ ~,o Q w 2 I !n ~ o e°I 3705 . " T ~/~e• ~ o ~ Q , 2500 ' ~ . MEMORANDUM TO: Julia FROM: Gregf* . RE: Annexations DATE: April 27, 1998 ZCA 98-5 Information is correct as stated. ZCA 98-6 subject parcel is in the USA service area and has a sewer available. Recommend that the area to be annexed be expanded to include the surrounding right- of-way with the public sewers. This would include Lehman St., Coral St. and 92nd Av. (Lehman St., and Coral St are County Roads and may require a separate action to annex.) For ZCA 98-7, sewer service is avilable from an 8-inch City sewer in S.W. Locust. (Map attached.) i:\eng\greg\deve1oplzca98-7. doc 9465 T Y 374' D8 ' 1990 I 13' 700 89' 900 302 ~ Q N o~ ~o 9451 T 9429 = ° ' cmv o ~ o ~S D I 3' - , , 8" .009 142 32 S 11111111111~ 803 4 D 4 - 8" .026 232' 8' D4' _ .010 85 ~ S,W, L 0 C UT S T. _ 600 - r- 804 co T 9453 ~ 9454 N _ /60/ o 104' ° f- 9D 84 01 I' D I L„ 1500 0 . ~ - D 4' Ul 500 17 2' Li- ~ 53' • 1600 m u' =o LL- CC) 179' ~ o ly 00 N , 9430 806 D41 951. D3' . 9463 T D~ ~ ' ~ 1602 Db . 77 ~ w D71 ~ /69' 0 590 ao Q 1800 1701 T 9456 1900 1901 ° ~ 1 742 D7' - 0 990 N ~ Q. ~ o N a ~ N • ~ p O -4.003 130~ 8.033 216' L.O. 90010 T 9432 ~ S. W. M A P L E L E A F 5 T. 9000/ D I I G ~ 1171 1200 ~ D7 2000 . N 431 qD10 384T 499 CO > D 9' 2202 ` D9' 90000 u. ~ - 945 T 2100 ~ ' 8 " Na .008 m0 385 ' ~ DIU' -J o 2200 2201 0 _ ~Q I____ r co _ N z soo '3~o s i 43' = z 400 ;,?no . 23o - . • ~'t/~n.Cr ~4~/~~>[q-~,"~, r ' H. Piease indicate all permits and/oc approvals from a City, County, or Regional ~ Government which will be needed for the proposed development. If already granted, please indicate date of appcoval and identifying number: APPROVAL PROJECT DATE OF FL'TURE FTLE K APPROVAL REQUIREtifENT Metro UGB Amendment Ciry or County Ptan A-mendment Pre-Application Hearin; (Ciry or Counry) Preliminary Subdivision Approval Final Plat Approval Land Parcition 1 . Conditional L'se 1 I Variance I Sub-Surface Sewage Disposal ~ Building Permit ~ I I Please submit copies oi proceedings relatin; to any of the aoove permits or approva!s which are pertinent to the anne:carion. . I. If a ciry andlor county-sancrioned cicizens' Qroup exists in the area of the annexation, ple3se list its name and address of a contact person. IV. SER G7CFS ANrJ UTILITIES A. Plesse indicate the followino: 1. Location and size oi nearest water line whicn can serve ;he suo}ec-, are3, 1 ~ Revised 11/93 N E I/4 NE I/4 SECTION 35 T I S R I W W.M, ~ IS I 201) i IS f 35 A A . l... , ' • ~ . ~ WASHiNGTON C0 ATY OREGON ~ ROAD VACATED 467/359 -7 194.16~ T ~Yr r 19o.3' SCALE 1"=100' ~ / -I • 35, 36 I I ~ I IOZ CANCELLED TA% LATS 801, 505,304, 3706, ~ 225NIL ~ 100, 101, 300, 2301,1300, 501, 3100, 2001, 301 ~ • SEE MAP I n i s i ZsDo i ~ ~I 22 _ ~ -60 Z E A S T 23 I 84.16 - - A io - - - - - - - - N ' INITIAL/ (POINT , 305 IIO 1 N TOWN OF NETZOEN 200 N 3 _ °z O&Ac; N b \ 94.1 x ~ ~ ~/J1►1► ~~~ry~/ ` , n ~ p r U m ::%//.%//.;::'/.;'!.'~::7 N f o . ~6Ac y s~ a~%zes 400 ' 302 ~ o ~ ~ ~ so';e4" yo' so' ao' e- ao. d 50 82.~}g3 ~ so' 701 IIAc.A.d 5 ~ • I i ii3o 05A . 903 9001 1 1 8029s1 0 843 ~ i 500 ~ • , 9, m: o m ~ ; ~s 154.82 • ~ I m I ~ ~oI C I m I 1 6 /,90. o 3' ~ _ I L 60.18607 5 n Ip I n I I ~ A ~ - 01SB9 i°-w S W L CUST ~ STREET I2_1 I I4_II3_42_-~~L_. „ M W o904 T r~ ~o 4804 ioo' iiz4' isq.is' 1 r 81•10598 1T5.275911 5 m 12 nl a91 I50 n ~ IZI iao ~ 0 600 500 / ' so• 1400 I601 so' Q ~ (n I .82A~ ~78Ac. 1500 m o 902 z ~ • ~ ro 805 .o m W I n a n n ~ 3 W ~ / > . m g (C.S No10836) ~ I I ~ ~ n 16 ~ 11 iis - e - n I n I LL . / .CQ . T- --T~m p e o: * 1600 N O I O6 I ^ LL. ~ N; m P N I I I h IIO O W ~ ~ m 901 ' eoo ~ p n n 1602 ~ I02. 2 i, ~ 0 a a J~. ' I I I ~ I ~ ~ 190.3 36 I 760'800_ L 60, ~~b0'_ ~ ~ L 60'~860_ 1.9- 60L 118.' ~ 1900 1901 1 01 W ~ 193.4 ~ ~ \ F 1800 e 23-64- 590 < n .1000 y . \ ~ i - I l.10 AC. ~ 50~ 50~ 50~ ~60'~ ~60 ; ~ b0' T 833' ; m ipLy gg ~ iooi ~ r, ~ ~ m. ~ 1702 1700 (n \ r ) ~ ~ , ' W C.S. 10107 N ~ 11/~~ r I J•~ lC , _ i 7 ~ 8 ~ r =r C.S.10578l. ~p° 20 ° 23 10021 3 R 2 ~ t rTs+o - 1- - - - jI - - - ~ 13 I 2 ao ao ~ 6 194. 16~ 5 190.3, ! 90 3~ 100'. I00~ I 80' ~8'_76' / 367.26~ ` - - - - - I 0 *5 g12 01 ~INPLELEAF STREET ~ --+i Y&CAf'E4- R60 T8'1ga ~ ' H°;;1101^ 1301 w • ~~,c,,, ol Lae.i' - - ~ - - - - - ~~9 401 I~ 50 2 2000 1942100 190.3 2200 190.3, „ I SEE MAP ; .BSAc. 2202 - =--1------~ - z7ac IS I 35AA ~ 0 ' N O SUPPLEMENTAL • nl 1200 ~nl ~ ~ N0. I . ~ 101100 ~.t: y. m I ~ p qS,IOt3B 22~~25 n ~ioo9 sa' 8 i4z.7' 75o' m ~ J "a I 9.0' ~ 7 i 3 .9~ 3;3707 r - - - - , , 38 ~ w 4o J J a0 2 i~.;' ~ e01 37 ;j~~ 05 ' ; t;~~~':. 5 , 4r?r~.?:4+ .iw . , • . . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Community Development RECEIVED PLANM&ingA BetterCommunity DATE: MaY 12,1998 J U N 12 1998 T0: lorl DorneY, US West Communlcatlons CITY OF TIGARD FROM: Ci~l of Tigard Planning Diuision STAfF CONTACT: lulia Powell Nalduk, Associate Planner Phone: 15031689-4111 Fax: [5031684-7297 RE: ZONE CNANGE ANNENATION QCA198-0001 ➢ TURNER ANHEIIATION Q The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the Site P1811, ViClllfal M8p 811d AppliCellt'S StAtC111Cl1t for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MAY 22. 19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. . PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWIN6 ITEMS TNAT APPLY: X, We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. ' _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (Please provufe the foam~ informtion) Name of Person[sl Commeming: Phone Number[sl: . • • REQUEST FOR=COMMENTS;- CITY OF TIGARD I ~ ! ~ ll U CommunityDeve(vpment 11 SfutpingA BetterCommunity ;i A( i 3 ijl;~~ I'RECEIVEDPLANNING DATE: MaY 12,1998 ~ T0: Julia Nuffman, USA/SWM Program 'v JUN.0 9 -~--e.--~ 1998 FROM: Ciql of Tigard Planning Diuision STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell i Uifi&late Planner Phone: 15031639-4i11 Fax: [5031684-1291 RE: ZONE CNAN6E ANNEMAflON QCA198-0001 ➢ TURNER ANNEMATION Q The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The • property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the SitB Pletl, Viclnity Map and Appllcant'S StetC111Cl1t for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, W E NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [ MAY 22, 19981. You may use the space provided below or attach , a separate letter to return your comments. If You 81'e u118b1e t0 rCSp011d b]I tlle ebOYe d8te, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CNECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ~ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. , _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (P(ense provirfe t(e foffou~ information) Name of Person(s) Comme Phone Number[sl: ~ ~ ~ - 1~~ oa a ' • • r - REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Deve(npment Skaping A Better Community DATE: May 12, 1998 RECEIVED PLANNING T0: Mlchael Miller, Operatlons Water Department Manager MAY 14 1998 CITY OF TIGARp FROM: CitY of Tigard Planning Dlulsion STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell H81duN, Associate Planner Phone: (50316394fl1 Fax: (50316841291 RE: ZONE CNANGE ANNEMAflON QCAI 98-0001 ➢ TURNER ANNEIIATION Q The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhbod Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the SitC Plell, Vlcinity Map and Applicant'S St8tC111Cl1t for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MAY 22. 1998]. You may use the space provided below or attach a ' separate letter to return your comments. If You are unable to respond by the aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE f OLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ~ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. W ritten comments provided below: L.IATE/L :5E&V1C.L' l.tJ/LL 5,e lQoiM ~Al.~tlT/~l V/JLL~y L1/dT'[..`~)Z_ D1SZ/l.4GT. (Please provule the fo!lnwr'ng informtion) Name of Person[sl Commeming: Phone Number[sl: 39s- ~ RECEIVED MAY 1 3 1998 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Community Development LAND USE 6 TRANSPORTATION Shapingsi Better Community DATE: MaY 12,1998 ° T0: Tom HarrY, Washin9ton Counbl Department of Land Use a Transportatlon FROM: Ciql of Tigard Planning Dhiislon STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Halduk, Assoctate Planner Phone: 15081659-4111 Fax: 15031684-1291 RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNEMAflON QCAI 98-0001 • ➢ TURNER ANNEIIATION Q The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the Slte P1811, Viclniv Map and Appllcant'S StetC111Cl1t for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MAY 22, 19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by Me aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments. and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWIN6 ITEMS THAT APPLY: ~ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (Pkwe provire thefoaou*y informtion) Name of Person(s) Commendng: , Phone Number(s): ~ _39(o •.~::t OEOORAiMIC INFORYATION 9Y61EY ~ r;: sT CQ► ` V1C1N1'IY MAP S'r Q ~ SUBJECT ~ -.i z `O~► N Z 04 PARCELTO ~ ~ ;~:c BE ANNEXE sT FZCA 98"0007 t~ c ~ I[- h 'hirner Annexation W > LOCUST j~ ,x+t~.~ s tt u- ~ ~ ~ µx ~r~' ~~~Y vwC "x . a, F~S~'~~~.i ~#~x-a tl ~c.;' ~`~.++•c.Y~~C,. ~'a't tit. ~ fY h F~ k 3 h'4 \ . \ 1`y 7 , k z MAPLELEAF ~ Tf J ki)S~ •CD Q"`4~,r,`k.~+,`~ ' ] ..sr . . ~i~~7.Y". ; ,,•ir ,~C.IK'JS,n e k ~ ;t~ ~ tc >,x~ ~ ~`S`~'x~3^. ` A i~~ ~ ~~'r KY ~ ~ ,~A ~~t ~ a3'~-`~' }r~t... , x,~ Y~, , ~ c S ~ ~ ~Sz~ ~ t'~y~, ~~a R • ~k .r.~ ~ ~ ; ' "j" t a+t•y 1 .r i ~ ,A , 1. s ~y ~`~5~ 'r e r ` r r, ,zti. ~ y .t ~h~~``~'~ 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet • f M1i~ f1 t. . $ ' y ~ ~ ti c. r ~ i ~ . y . ~ . 1'a 378 (eet ~ 1 PINE STa~ . • r . 'i^~ >*4 . . r~^,.~s a}'~'~ ) s ~'i` . . u ~ E CIty ofTigarcl F tyy h .,F '-O. ,N 2,,~y F k 3 . , T ; ""S ti~f . " . F; , r i' h t~+..~{ ~ ~ ~ 55 d'x. ' ~ t . 1Aa k.~ ~ • t~--~ '~Yr9 ~ } trdormetlan on Ws mep b far penafal loeation ariy aM shadd Oe varlfled witl~ tl~s Devdaptnsri Servkes OMtion. 13125 SW Hd BNd t: ' ; ~ . , , . SRRUCE n4v4OR 97229 ~ . . f. . • . ~ ~ ~ (sw) essem ..i Mtp•lAvww.d.tigard.a.us co-meY DCRoP=d Piat dft MAy d.1998: cNJ~OLipr , • . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD • Community Development Shaping A Better Community DATE: MaY 12,1998 T0: Cralg EYestone, Columbia Cable ComqanY FROM: Cfpl of Tigard Planning Dhilslon STAFF CONTACT: lulta Powell Na1duK, Associate Planner Phone: 15051689-4111 Fax: [5031684-1291 RE: ZONE CHAN6E ANNEIIATION QCAI 98-0001 ➢ TURNER ANNEIIATION Q The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the SitB PI8t1, Viclnial Map and Appllcant'S StetCtllCllt for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MAY 22, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If YOU ere u11861C t0 reSp011d bY tl18 860ue dete, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CNECK TNE FOLLOWIH6 ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. • _ Written comments provided below: (P(ease provirfe tfie forrm~ infomation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number[s): p s - ~ ' • • 4REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Skaping A Better Community DATE: MeY 12,1998 T0: lim Wolf, Tigard Police Department Crime Preuentlon Officer FROM: Cip1 of Tigard Planning Diuislon STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell Haiduk, Associate Planner Phone: [5031639-4t11 Fax: (50316841297 RE: ZONE CNANGE ANNENATION QCAI 98-0001 ➢ TURNER ANNFXATION Q The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the Si[e Plell, Yiclnity Map and ApplicanYS SteteroCtlt for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MAY 22, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by ihe aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as,possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWIN6 ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ~ Written comments provided below: Qe00a.S't *rok A Vowi1e ~O aaSt av,A \4est ot- "we 0fCW_t4 ' cbr'VsVs~ (Please provide tfie fo!lowing infornration) Name of Person(s) Commendng: 6 V~►0 Phone Number(s): 1a.0 REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Community Deve(apment ShapingA Better Community DATE: MaY 12,1998 . T0: Brlan Rager, Deuelopment Reuiew Englneer FROM: Ciql of Tigard Planning Diuislon STAFF CONTACT: lulia Powell HaIduk, Associate Planner Phone: [50316394171 fax: [50316847297 RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNENATION QCA198-0001 ➢ TURNER ANNEMATION Q . The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the Site Plell, Viclnity Map and Applicant'S StBtCmCllt for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MAY 22. 19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond bY the aboue date, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS TNAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Y ~f Ve/191 : U ~c~✓(d 9l~c+ !~i ~Jtv1.~X2~` (Please provirfe tle foffo~ infonnation) Name of Person(s) Commendng: Phone Number[s): • . REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD Community Develnpment Shuping A. Better Community DATE: May 12,1998 T0: lohn RoY, Properql Manaoer/Operations Department - FROM: Ciql of Tigard Planntng Dhilsion STAfF CONTAC lulia Powell Halduk, Associate Planner ' Phone: [50316394111 fax: [50316841291 RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNENATION QCAI 98-0001 ➢ TURNER ANNEMATION Q The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the SItB Plan, Viciniql Map and AppllcanYS StAtC111Cl1t for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [ MAY 22,19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a , separate letter to return your comments. If You el'e u118b1e t01'eSp011d bY tl18 ab0ue dete, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. Pnwe HECK TNE FOLLOWING ITEMS TNAT APPLY: _ have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (Please provide the fo!lounng infomativn) Name of Person[sl Commentlng: Phone Number[sl: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIOARD Community Deve(npment ShapirB A Better Community DATE: MaY 12,1998 T0: Brtan Moore, PGE Seruice Design Consuttant FROM: City of Tigard Planntng Dluision STAFF CONTACT: lulla Powell Halduk, Assoclate Planner P6one: 15031639-4fl1 Fax: (50316841291 RE: ZONE CNANGE ANNENAflON QCA198-0001 TURNER ANNEMATION Q . The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the S(te Plell, Viclnlty Map and ApplicanYS StetCmCllt for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: [MAY 22.19981. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If You ere u118b1e t01'CSp011d bY the ebOYe dete, please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CHECK TNE FOLLOWIN6 ITEMS THAT APPLY: ✓ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (P(ease provule tke forrv,*& infomation) Name of Person(s) Commenting: Phone Number[sl: S-X:;,- 44,.vC, CITY OF TIGARD Community Development Ska i A Better Communi t ' . ...~,~f~z.~ ~ .~3 ~t*~* . ~ , x . c.. ..u• I e x . 120 DAYS = N/A FILE NO(S): ZONE CHAHGE ANNEIIATION [ZCAI 98-0001 FILE TITLE: TURNER ANNEIIATION APPLICANT/ OWNER: Steve Turner 2015 SW Kanan Street Portland, OR 97201 REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. CIT: East CIT FACILITATOR: List Available Upon Request DECISION MAKING BODY: DATE COMMENTS DUE: FRIDAY - MAY22,1998 STAFF DECISION DATE OF DECISION: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:30 P.M. HEARINGS OFFICER DATE OF HEARING: TIME: 7:00 P.M. X CITY COUNCIL DATE OF HEARING: 6-9-98 TIME: 7:30 P.M. PROJECT RELATED COMPONENTS AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IN THE PLANNING DIVISION X VICINITY MAP LANDSCAPING PLAN NARRATIVE _ ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SITE PLAN OTHER STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Haiduk, Associate Planner (503) 639-4171, ext. 407. ZONE CHANGE ANNEXATION APPLlCATION CITY OF TIGARD 13125 SW Hall 81vd., Tigard, OR 97223 (503) 639-4171 FAX (503) 684-7297 PRE-APP. HELD WITH: OATE OF PRE-APP.: GENERAL INFORMATION FOR ST~kFF USE ONLY Properry Address/Location(s): # Case No.(s)- z.'c~i 9 8-c~oo 7 Tax Map 8~ Tax Lot #(s): i~ A, 7X1-k Lc~T 4C?O Othec Case>No:(s);: : . . : : , . . Receipt No:: Site Si2e: SO Z.5 Application Accepted By:: . ~ , . Property Owner/Deed Holder(s)': R• fi1~1+•C~., Address: Phone: Date Detecmined::To: Be..Compiete:. City: :22YZTt-PAA19 Zip. q~,Z-o J . . . : Applican~~~~~ ` Comp PlarttZone Designation: Address: Phone: City: ZiP: C!T Area: ' When the owner and the applicant are different peop{e, the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written auchorization trom the owner or an agent of the owner with written authorization. The owner(s) must sign this application in-the space BEQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS ~ provided on the baclc of this form or submit a written authorizatian with this application. I ✓ Application Elements Submitted: ~ , PROPOSAI. SUMMARY j p' Application Farm ~ The owners of record of the subject property request a Zone Change ❑ Completed Boundary Commission `orms ~ Annexation from Washington County AIC, to Tigard for "Doubie Majority" Annexation p Owners SignatureMlritten Authorization dc,_ (if applicable) and a Zone Change from Vlashington ~ I Counry IV(L to Tigard Nc. Tit1e Transfer Insirument or Deed ~ ~ C] Site/P1ot Ptan , i of copies based on pre-app check list) I (provide any additional information here) ~C3 SiteJPlot Plan (reduced 81/,"x 11 4 ❑ Applicant's Statement ~ of rapies based on pre-app ;»heck tist) i I p Filing Fee J,1.,1fdZM ' • ~ 1 . ~ APPLICANTS: To consider an appiication compiete, you will need to submit ALL of the BEQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the "Required Submittal Elements" box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be abtained, upon reguest, for a4{ rypes of Land lfse Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above reauest does not violate any deed restrictions that mav be attached to or imoosed uoon the subiect A19pe1'SS[. . • tf the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to ail the conditions and limitations of the approval. • Alt of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so aclcrlowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • Tfie applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including tlhe policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. ' SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. • c DATED this day of . 19 Owner's Signatu' Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature 2 N E I/4 NE 114 SECTION 3 5 T I S R f W W.M. , „ WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON ROAD VWATEo 457i359 r -7 - - 194.16' ~ ~ r ~ SCALE 1'l=100' ~ / ~ I usw/L ~ - - -=T - - 301 ZI SEE MAP 15~ 3 5 tqR -I ~ I I S I 26DD yQ ~ 22 i 1 ~ 84.16 ' - - - _ ~ INITIAL' IPOINT J/OcJ tip I TOWN OF MET20ER ` 44.16 ~u ( ul/,~r► ~r~m~iiiiiiriiiiiiiiiiiii~ ~ iiiiiiiiiiii~iimriiriii-, ~~,iii:iiii i•;iiiiii VA,~ ~ ./6Ac. se4/216's~ 400 ' 302 "o so' s' ~ 50' o' so ea'3~3 , so' 701~/ llQc.A.$ es ~ I Bo .05A I ~ 802 803 i 1 so o ~-x z , - ~ ~ oI ~0 I ~ ~o JC _ l_ B 131.1 'n _ t 0 _I ~ - I a • I I ~ -i ~ I 1 ~ pIS89 30~W ~ o S~2 ~ ' ~ ~ J \ 4 194. 1 6' ~Cas' _0\~1 ~ 0 1\~ n 804 o 0 Z i o o' i i 7.4! 1400 ° 1 1 0 600 500 60 ~ _130 n , 12130 (n ( .azal • 7ea. ' M 805 w it p r~ ~3 ~ 6 ~ I I 115 w > - - -a ,,,n -T LL IIO N 1 806 1 u- r ~ ~ o Q ~w a~ 800 C c 102.42 / • ri < < 1oy 37- ~ Osj ~7so'--L8so_aso'1is.' C~) 01900 1901 - 193.4 ' 590 v 50~~ r-50; -1 60' 7 933' UO AC. ~ , an o ~ F- r o, 7 P. C.S. 10107 m. A 20 ' J 23 $ 1 ~ - ~ , ~ , ~ , - ~ 1J r r ~ q I ~ 13 ~ 2 S 3Ot _ O- ~ ~ 48.T6 / 387. 2 S' I 4.16' OI _ r ` i . ~ , j i° 1301 ~CD~ vAcAfEv' R eo s.s- isz ' P L 3 9.7' _ nl 1b9 401 " 14r 56 ~ ; 2000 19 4.16' • SEE MAP ~ - - .2~Ac IS 1 35AA ` .85Ac. . ~ SUPPLEMENTAL ~ 1200 'Nj N0. I C6 _m m ~ 8 14 2.7' 7 so' \Q , r + 04%22/96 08:50 '0503 284 8530 WB WELLS & ASSOC Q002/002 • • ~ - . 35-1S1-267 19.252 . c~ ur~~E o~r.a e i z~~55 7 Y'.:;%T~.p `/O_i ''T~L✓N Os~ M6;~.R ~ V4caTE0 - eZ~v = ~zs s F ; 0 ~ ti - - T9.7E' - / u Q A • • ~ 8_ S ~t.' h h N L.G.•7°~.77' t7 0- dd-- '~yE+ ~ ~ ~ A;• a . .g✓~`~-- / t ~ ~ N 69°3S 3ee o _ . n ;V+ S Ao'- [40CuST slRfW71' ` ~ w • G. R _ 753 ' ~ ~ • ,NL~DVL./H~N7' f i~7. ~5 GVOT~p ~ • iN N.4J~R~¢TI'v~ a~ G~SrS C.iF ~~.ON~/tiG5 : 5~ ~~w4M~Xl - ~l✓- STR~67 l~ : g. S~r-.~}. srE~Ga ~'Y~~UMEJt/Y' Q . ,V4ff4~0 .40'4.ort a",Pj.w eo,sr. A✓.v~ ~W-4E JQFs~R1~/C€ /GW LB~Y~- f3K.B~.~• V M% M . • ~ • COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS, INC. Le9al P.O. BOX 370 PHONE (503) 684-0360 NOtiCe TT 914 3 BEAVERTON, OREGON 97075 Legai Notice Advertising • City of Tigard/Planning • ❑ Tearsheet Notice 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard , Oregon 9 7 2 2 3 • ❑ Duplicate Affidavit 'Accounts Payahle • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ~ss. 1, Kathy Snyder being first duly sworn, depose and sey that I am the Advertising . Director, or his principal clerk, of theTigard-TLa1 ati n Tlmes a newspaper of genecal circulation as defined in ORS 193.010 and 193.020; published at Tigard in the aforesaiq county and state; that the Hearinq-Turner Annexation s printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for QNE successive and consecutive in the following issues: t4ay 28,1998 3YL, I ~ nAl- Subscribed and sworn before me this 28th day of may., 1998 o ryPublic for Oregon .j0P~,~;."`` Iv T/:Y L~~~..•UnEGON My Commission Expires: COMthiSSivR tN'G. 062Q71 MY COMMISSIQN EXPIRES MAY 96, 2001 AFFIDAYIT . i ~ ...-.-....n. "Mies'.T.fi~' ..~.~:i''~ a.~'_..s«. ~v 1 ~r,.;,p;;s't~,NaW.C[ t4!t/f1.,: •^'YL.:.i..~• ...-.a T6e follow~g.wi11 lie;cflrisider"ed,by'the Tigard Cjty Councilon JUNE ; 9,1998°at7r',30 P.M., aCsthe;Tigard Civic Center- Town Hall Room,; ' ~ 13125 SW Hall Blvd:, Mgard, Oregon 97223: Botfi public oial and'written, N.:t~. t festimony;i's,u►y~ted.;The public heanng on this'matter.will.be conducted' : ; ry""with'the rules of'Cha ter;18:32~of~ttie»Ti aid,Mun'icipal~ m.accordnce a, . . ~r,• n..~. 1n~, ~ ~ Coile.~~ an~'aany.~niles. and pmcedures•ad`opted 6y~ ..:the~Tigardty Council;.or'..' rul " ' ~-~.T ~ L, w, ~ ;r~`c. es of procedure set frn'th'in .Cha`"tei 18.30. -.''3`:R ~ ~ P . . ~ ~ ~y..~~us. ..n. - j_:. Failuie.~.~,~~~.~~ "to.iaise`an;is;sue.in.person;orby,~l,etter at somepoint:~pnor,tortttie . ~ close'of the-hearing onthe"request*accompazued tiy: sfatenients or evidence~. .~,...R.. - sufficient,io allow the.Heanngs Authority',~and~all ttie paRies to respond onr, ~ the request,~'precludes an appeal.to the Land Use Board of.Appeals,based~ ~ on that sue, and failure to specify ~ttie cnterion"-fiom'tfi'e Community ; DevFlopment,Code orComprehens Pve Plan ai which'a comment is ' diiec'ted precludes an-appeal based on,tat criterion. Furttier.~information is;~~. ~ available ai City i~all and may be"obtuned froiri~the Community.Develop- . ' ment D'iiector oi~City RecofdeT at th~ame location; or by calling (503) ` f 639-4171. : - ~ PUBLICHEARING•.":il:.~tlf .0~?YZONE CSANGE ATINEXATION [ZCA]98-0007 ; --;'~.,yv.i•TURNERANNEXATION <~►'~r~~; 'v~%~~~a-~~,~~~?` 'ilhe applicant has requested to annez one (1):lo't consis'ting of :11~ acres of•, w, ; unincorporated Wastungton Countyland into,the..Cify of.Tigard.and to : ; change;;the',Compreherisi_v,ei.Plan aud,Zoni,ng Designation~.~rom~,:~. ; Washington County Neighborhood,Commercial-to. City,of,TigaidNeighi~; ~ F borhood Commercial'.`l C-N.. CURRENT•ZOIVING DESIGNATION:,.; t u.. 't~.l• a -t•~ •$b Iorliood EC't.tma ~ Washing~ont1abCounry. Neigoimercial., RECOMMENDED'; ~ ZONIIVGDESIGNATION:`It is.reco~ime_'naed tt►at the City"of.Tigar Zonmd = a v-~ j`j~' : designated .Fag~ sDes~.~..ign►at~, >ion > oerf s r^^ Neigh6o~} 9y 'rboodCommercialt(C N)~_,be upon:annexation as''this desi" aUon mos't~c~lo"s~ljr `msiottie,C~oun~'~ ~'t r..~'' t•49 " ty 's'cuii+ent''designatieaa'~ION=T6o °sub~ect ~`aTCe] islocated':iiortfif~ e-- r' of SW L:ocust Street~aa3;~:west;of;~W ,8~th:~Avenue;lWCTM~dS1~5AA;~?: 3'au'L"ot 00400i~APPLICA$L'~raBEYIEW'CRITERIA ~~igai~d',Com;m"i. pnehensive_P.lan -hcieS,~2.1:1;~10 ~ ~;:1~.1.2laiid 10 Y:3 ~~nd~Tigard;~Com;}'~ munit`y_-•Dev elopn~eajCode Sitions'18136,a~n_d~}8138 ti$ ,a.~~ a~. k ~ 0 - a' siUr ..~t~'~4~3.5 P r~''~ . Arax~~ r~~ iLL'rw zY?r..r rta, ~~-,e3`d ~r~r qt.$~` ` . ~='d';. 1► tia~ < _.A 3. 1 ' $J' ii Y,~ "dE` : r' ~ .iFtit Y : .Y" u Lt d . . r~ty z ~ ~ . e r a ZVI " ' M yt~ 4 I r ~ +Y Y -3 J, t l} 'Tj `ti t"'F~ 1~4 . 6 il 'l•.r'F: 'd 'r_ ; ~ ~ v. , ~'Y ^ ~ .r r^ T };j - . ' - : . ~ ~ i,7~" ` ~ Y'_ • !~~'t~: ,y f3 ) .~:~i !i . .V ~F.; r ~ p n s Ui,"rn :~.17Z~~ ( ~ % ~ • .i - i = r ' M y 6• p4 J~.~ I :1 : / •1 ~ r'.yTi a~.. ,R - all:~» A. + ~ S • • ^ T~~... r, . i: ~ . f• _ . .-Tw t;~. . . t.Nl1~,_i.37~: •~':i ~.5` :.iry` ~tr~} •-~1 ~•i •l: • , . ' ~cr•i.•'Y.`.' w . . . . . . ,a .u ;.t' 1 • • ~~~.r~px ~ CITY OF TIOARD Cvmmunity Development ' Shaping A Better Community PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, AT A MEETING ON TUESDAY, JUNE 9,1998 AT 7:30 PM, IN THE TOWN HALL OF THE TIGARD CIVIC CENTER, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARD, OREGON 97223 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING APPLICATION: FILE NO(S): ZONE CHANGE ANNEIIATION QCAI 98-0001 FILE TITLE: TURNER ANNEIIATION APPLICANT: Steve Tumer OWNER: Same 2015 SW Kanan Street Portland, OR 97201 REQUEST: To annex one (1) lot consisting of .11 acres of un-incorporated Washington County land into the City of Tigard and to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Designations from Washington County Neighbofiood Commercial to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial, C-N. LOCATION: The subject parcel is located north of SW Locust Street and west of SW 87th Avenue; WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION: Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. RECOMMENDED ZONING DESIGNATION: It is recommended that the City of Tigard Zoning Designation of Neighborhood Commercial (C-N) be designated upon annexation as this designation most closely conforms to the County's current designation. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Tigard Comprehensive Plan Policies 2.1.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2 and 10.1.3; and Tigard Community Development Code Sections 18.136 and 18.138. THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES OF CHAPTER 18.32 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND RULES OF PROCEDURE ADOPTED BY THE TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL, OR RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 18.30. ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING. THE CITY WILL ALSO ENDEAVOR TO ARRANGE FOR QUALIFIED SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS AND QUALIFIED BILINGUAL INTERPRETERS UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CALL (503) 639-4171, EXT. 320 (VOICE) OR (503) 684-2772 (TDD - TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES FOR THE DEAF) NO LESS THAN ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE HEARING TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. ANYONE WISHING TO PRESENT W EN TESTIMONY ON THIS PROPOS ACTION MAY DO SO IN WRITING PRIOR TO OR AT THE PUBLIC HEAF~ ORAL TESTIMONY MAY BE PRES~ED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL RECEIVE A STAFF REPORT PRESENTATION FROM THE CITY PLANNER, OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND INVITE BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ANOTHER MEETING TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR CLQSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION ON THE APPLICATION. IF A PERSON SUBMITS EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT TO THE APPLICATION AFTER MAY 19. 1998, ANY PARTY IS ENTITLED TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING. IF THERE IS NO CONTINUANCE GRANTED AT THE HEARING, ANY PARTICIPANT IN THE HEARING MAY REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN FOR AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE HEARING. A REQUEST THAT THE RECORD REMAIN OPEN CAN BE MADE ONLY AT THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ORS 197.763(6). INCLUDED IN THIS NOTICE IS A LIST OF APPROVAL CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO THE REQUEST FROM THE TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE AND THE TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE REQUEST BY THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE BASED UPON THESE CRITERIA AND THESE CRITERIA ONLY. AT THE HEARING IT IS IMPORTANT THAT COMMENTS RELATING TO THE REQUEST PERTAIN SPECIFICALLY TO THE APPLICABLE CRITERIA LISTED. FAILURE TO RAISE AN ISSUE IN PERSON OR BY LETTER AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE CLOSE OF THE HEARING ON THE REQUEST ACCOMPANIED BY STATEMENTS OR EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE HEARINGS AUTHORITY AND ALL PARTIES TO RESPOND PRECLUDES AN APPEAL, AND FAILURE TO SPECIFY THE CRITERION FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT WHICH A COMMENT IS DIRECTED PRECLUDES AN APPEAL TO THE LAND USE BOARD OF APPEALS BASED ON THAT ISSUE. ALL DOCUMENTS AND APPLICABLE CRITERIA IN THE ABOVE-NOTED FILE ARE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST OR COPIES CAN BE OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25~) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST.. AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT NO COST, OR A COPY CAN BE . OBTAINED FOR TWENTY-FIVE CENTS (25C) PER PAGE, OR THE CURRENT RATE CHARGED FOR COPIES AT THE TIME OF THE REQUEST. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY RECORDER OR STAFF PLANNER JULIA POWELL HAJDUK AT (503) 639-4171, TIGARD CITY HALL, 13125 SW HALL BOULEVARD, TIGARU, OREGON 97223. • ` ° PARCEL TO ~BE AN L N L i ' <i' . j: W ♦ ..L ~ ~ '{~,5, ~f ~ Q y6tb ~,r y6 LOCUST t^y. , <ty . ^'B 4 1 ~aM r 73 , r • • f~~.}. . b :~'a ^^w ~ 4Yvi~i~ +~{+x g r { ~ !t3. MAPLELEAF ' ~°~,7e~ ~t~ ~{E t .'r. yzt .l;• ~ :$+'i . ~ F ~ ~ s !rx . ~ l~7t~~ ~r ~A kl~, ~ A r9:T'- 1$ n~~ '~F~ tiM ~ear; u 'F~u} _y~ ~i ~j-t~r ,.•.%y+, l ~ 5~t+~' i t 1 ~,f~ i t~ ~,~rf,; ~ ' 7 ~~r►~ ~ ~ . I I~LYLIV~G'~ ~K~~v.t~~-w-~ tUN v/J EXHxBzT B FS126DD-01901 1 S126DD-02600 FACKRELL DALE & MARY & STEVEN LOVIK DAVID E AND PO BOX 5475 20624 BRIGHTWOOD LN BF-AVERTON, OR 97006 BEND, OR 97702 1S126DD-02700 iS126DD-03100 LEDFORD VIRGINIA H TRUST THE WESTON INVESTMENT CO 1042 RANDOLPH RD 2154 NE BROADWAY WOODBURN, OR 97071 PORTLAND, OR 97232 1S135AA-00301 1S135AA-00302 HAYZLETT MAXINE TR JOHANSSON MARTIN & JOAN 17015 SW ELDORADO DR 8290 SW LANDAU TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD, OR 97223 1 S135AA-00305 1 5AA-00390 SILLS DONALD N ET AL JOHA ON IN & JOAN 10115 SW HALL 8290 S U TIGARD, OR 97223 TM-AD, OR 972 1S135AA-00400 iS135AA-00500 TURNER STEVEN R EIDENSCHINK IRMA PO BOX 25216 8740 SW LOCUST DRIVE PORTLAND, OR 97298 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1S135AA-00600 1 S135AA-00700 EIDENSCHINK ERMA E WESTON JOSEPH E 8740 SW LOCUST 2154 NE BROADWAY TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97232 1 5AA-007 1S135AA-00803 TIGA Y OF HERBERHOLZ LARRY S& CATHY D 13125 ALL 9620 SW 90TH AVE T RD, OR 7223 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1S135AA-00804 iS135AA-00805 LAt KHOAN VAN & VO.VIEN T& 10161 SW JEFFERSON AVE 10181 SW JEFFERSON ST TIGARD, OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 1S135AA-00806 1S135AA-01400 MILLS MICHAEL E AND BESLEY PROPERTIES INC 10211 SW JEFFERSON 9900 SW GREENBERG RD TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND, OR 97223 1S135AA-01900 BOOTH JOICE GOSSETT STEVE TURNER 10250 SW 87TH AVE 2015 SW KANAN STREET PORTLAND, OR 97223 PORTLAND OR 97201 ~ ~ ~ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIHG cm oF nonac Community ~Deve(opmrnt Shaping/1 BettaCommunity .S`~'iarn OF 02j,EGOx . D~ cvunty f o tivasfnngton ) ss. - City of TWard ) I, Tacricia G. Lunsfnr( being first duly swom/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am an,4dmmistsatim SpeciaCut II for the City of 7'~gar4 `tNashingtan Councy, oregon and that I served the following: (ChW*AFPWr. ema.) e.eO ❑ NOTiCE OF DECISION FOR: - 0 aMaoED nwnce Fue No.nlam Retrerm) 0 City of Tigard Planning Director 01 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR: 2:~Zj!~A-~'t - --j a2 ~Nd~ ~LI 1 Cl AMENDED NOTICE (File No.Mame Reference) (Daoe a( Public Hearin9) . ❑ City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ / Tigard Planning Commission Tigard City Council ❑ NO11CE OF FINAL ORDER fOR: 2:7 0 AMENDED NOTICE (Fle No.Mame Rd&eme) (Daae d Pudic Heaarg) 0 City of Tigard Planning Director 0 Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission 0 Tigard City Council 0 NOTICE OF fOR: (7YPeAGnd d Na4ice) (Fle No.M2me Referer=) (Qam d Pudic Hearing, if applirade) A copy of the PUBLIC HEARIN6 NOTICE/NQTICE OF DECISION/NOTICE OF RMAL ORDER/OTHER NO11CE[S] of which is attached, marked ddlQlit "A", was r~~iled to eacb person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), mariced E1d11b " the ~l f 1998, and deposited in the United States Mail on the day of 1998, postage prepaid. (Person that Prerpared No ice) Subscribed and sworNaffirmed before me on the day of , 19~ , ~ OFFICIAL SEAL DIANE M JELDERKS NOTARY PUBIIC•OREGON '`COMMISSION NO. 048142 NOTARY PUBLIC OF E N MV COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPTEMBEp Oy, 199~ • My COt11t111SS1011 ElqlUBS: ~ ZCA 98-0007 NOTICE OF FINAL~RDER BY CITY COUNCIL • Steve Turner 2015 SW Kanan Street Portland, OR 97201 CITY . . ~ OEOORAPHICINiORYATION SYSTEM 1 sT CQ►~ ` V1C1N11Y MAP - z SUBJEC'f ~ O Z PARCEL TO ~ N c ~ BE ANNEXED ST O ~ F ZCA 98"0007 j ~ ; . Turner Annexation - .W ST i- ¢ 0 LOCUST . w. . MAPLELEAF"ST . ~ ~ w MAPLELEAF t , . . w. ' . OD. U) co 90 _ ` ST AK c • N , 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet O~O `O PINE ST r=37ereet E C.ity of Tigarci Information m Ws map is fa general locatim wJy end should be verified wtth tlre DevelopmerR Savices DMsbn. . CE ST +3125 sw fwo sr~a SRRUCE nga.e, oR 97223 (503) 639-4771 httpJAvww.d.tlgard.a.us Commnmty Develupmert - - Flot due Mty 11.1998: c\m&yic\=0c0l.&Pr i • y REQUEST FOR COMMENTS CITY OF TIGARD . ' Community Development Shaping A Be#er Community DATE: MaY 12,1998 , T0: PER ATTACHED FROM: Cipl of Tigard Planntng Diuision STAFF CONTACT: Julia Powell Haiduk, Associate Planner Phone: [50316594111 Fax: [50316841297 RE: ZONE CHANGE ANNENAflON 9CA198-0001 ➢ TURNER ANNEMATION Q The applicant is requesting to annex .11 acres of property into the City of Tigard and adopt the City equivalent zoning of Neighborhood Commercial. LOCATION: WCTM 1 S135AA, Tax Lot 00400. The property is located north of SW Locust Street near SW 87th Avenue. ZONE: The proposed zone change is to City of Tigard Neighborhood Commercial from Washington County Neighborhood Commercial. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Section 18.136. Attached is the Site PI811, YiClllily Meq elld AppliCellt'S StetC111Cl1t for your review. From information supplied by various ' departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff, a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: (MAY 22, 1998). You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. It You ere unabl8 t0 reSpOnd bY t118 abOYe dete, please phone the staff contact noted.above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact the Tigard Planning Division, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, OR 97223. PLEASE CIIECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: _ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. _ Please contact of our office. _ Please refer to the enclosed letter. _ Written comments provided below: (Please provirfe de fo!l" infornration) Name of Person[sl Commentlng: Phone Number[sl: • REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • ` NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE 8 COMMONITY OEYELOPMENT APPLICATIONS crraroa (erM cs) M.: . ".:CI11iEN~,INYOLVEMENi;TEAMS.° Aa PlaufornWewlnUbruftCRBeok[sl~ ' . fllE NO[Sl--_,ZCa4 qA 000 -7 FILE NAME[Sl: , . . _ : t., ..CITY.OFFICES= . _ - . . . „ . ~ _ ADVANCED PIANNING/Nadine Smith, q.nninyswwi.o._ COMMUNITY DVLPMNT. DEPT./wromm.s.o.r.onoidws &-"-POLICE DEPTJJim Wolf, Gim* P-pnionOfikw _ BUILDING DIV.;Oavid Scott, BuiltlinqOllkiL NGINEERING DEPTJBrian Rager, Wipmm. R~viwEnqinMr ~WATER DEPTJMichael Miller,o,.,,~~,. M.,~.,., _ CITY AOMINISTRATIOWCathy Wheatley, GryR~eaer d ~PERATIONS DEPTJJohn Roy, P,owryM..syw ~ OTHER ; . . , . ; . _ . , . _ _ : _ . , . . . t °-SPECIAL.D _ _ . . - IsTRICTS':= _ _ TUAL HILLS PARK & REC. DIST.* TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE ~---TALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ~ 6UNIFIED SWRGE. AGENCY ~ Planning Manager Fire Marshall Administrative Oflice Julia HuftmaNSWM Program 15707 SW Walker Road Washington County Fire District PO Box 745 155 N. First Street Beaverton, OR 97006 (place in pick-up box) Beaverton, OR 97075 Hiilsboro, OR 97124 ,`;tOCALAND:STAtEI'URISDiCTTiONS CITY OF BEAVERTON ~ CITY OF TUALATIN ~ OR. DEPT. OF FISH & WILDLIFE OR. DIV. OF STATE I.ANDS Planning Manager Planning Manager 2501 SW First Avenue 775 Summer Street, NE Mike Matteucci, Neiynenw, coord. PO Box 369 PO Box 59 Salem, OR 97310-1337 PO 8ox 4755 Tualatin, OR 97062 Portland, OR 97207 Beaverton, OR 97076 OR. PUB. UTILITIES COMM. METRO - IAND USE & PLANNING ~ OR. DEPT. OF GEO. & MINEHAL IND. 550 Capitoi Street, NE CITY OF DURHAM ~ 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street, Suite 5 Salem, OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland, OR 97232-2736 Portland, OR 97232 PO Box 23483 US ARMY CORPS. OF ENG. Durham, OR 972813483 Paulette Allen, Growth ManagemerqCoorWnafor OR. DEPT. OF LAND CONSERV.& DVLP 333 SW First Avenue _ Mel Huie, GreenspacasCoordinator(CPA's20A's) 1175 Court Street, NE PO 8ox 2946 CITY OF KING CITY * / Salem, OR 97310-0590 Portland, OR 97208-2946 Ciry Manager ~METRO AREA BOUNDARY COMMISSION 15300 SW 116th Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street OREGON DEPT. OF TRANS. (ODO~ WASHINGTON COUNTY ~ King Ciry, OR 97224 Building #16, Suite 540 Aeronautics Division Dept. of Land Use 8 Trans. Portland, OR 97232-2109 Tom Highland, vtardiiny 155 N. First Avenue _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO ~ 3040 25th Street, SE Suite 350, MS 13 Planning Director OR. DEPT. OF ENERGY Salem, OR 97310 Hilisboro, OR 97124 PO Box 369 Bonnevilie Power Administration Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Routing TTRC - Attn: Renae Ferrera ODOT, REGION 1!F Brent Curtis (cvn•8) PO Box 3621 Sonya Kazen, ovromt. aw. w«a. Scott King (cvn•S) 4--~_CITY OF PORTLAND Portland, OR 97208-3621 123 NW Flanders Mike 8orreson (enyi~) Oavid Knowles, vmnning eweeu oir. Portland, OR 97209-4037 r,1im Tice (iGn•s) Portland Building 106, Rm. 1002 OREGON, DEPT. OF ENVIRON. QUALITY ~ T om Harry (c~en vi. nm.) 1120 SW Fifth Avenue 811 SW Sixth Avenue ODOT, REGION 1- OISTRICT 2A ~ Phil Healy (aweu ai. rm.) Portland, OA 97204 Portland, OR 97204 Jane Estes, P~nsrecwist _ Sr. Cartographer(canrzcn•MS,a) PO Box 25412 Portland, OR 97298-0412 . . . . _ , UTILITY PROYIDERS AND:SPECIAL A6ENCIES°. BURLINGTON NORTHERW SANTA FE R/R METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS &P'ORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC l.Td'1CABLEVISION OF OR. Fieed Fay, Division Superintendent Jason Hewitt Brian Moore,Svc.Design Consultant Linda Peterson 1313 W. 11th Street Twin Oaks Technology Center 9480 SW Boeckman Fioad 3500 SW Bond Street Vancouver, WA 986603000 1815 NW 169th Place, S-6020 Wiisonvilie, OR 97070 Portland, OR 97201 8eaverton, OR 97006-4886 ZCOLUMBIA CABLE COMPANY ~ PORTLAND WESTERN R/R TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Craig Eyestone ~tVW NATURAL GAS COMPANY Steve Myhr, Region Manager Michael Kiser, Project Planner 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Scott Palmer Catellus Property Management 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton, OA 97005 220 NW Second Avenue 999 Third Avenue, Suite 2120 Portland, OR 97232 GENERAL TELEPHONE Portland, OR 97209-3991 Seattle, WA 98104-4037 Paul Koft, Engineering OREGON ELECTRIC R/R SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS. CO. R/R ' US WEST COMMUNICATION MC: 08030546 (BURl/N670MMO1ffHfRH/SAN/AffR/RVREDAfSOR) Clifford C. Cabe, Construction Engineer Pete Nelson Tigard, OR 97281-3416 Reed Fay, Division Superintendent 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard 421 SW Oak Street 1313 W. 11th Street Portland, OR 97232 Portland, OR 97204 Vancouver, WA 98660-3000 INO/CATfi Af/tOMAY1t MOi1i1CA?ION IY IrITN/N 2s0' Oi !NL iNBJLC! OROPiQff iOR ANl►/ALL CIt1 PAO.FLC'!S. IvaooFser iiwwwsu Is assvoasrsss soa #wMCwrrMe vaerns ro aorIsrl h:\patrylmastersVtcnotice.mst 16-Jan-98 CITY ' AR' ST OEOORAPHIC INFORMATION SVHTEY isi snno o AREA NOTIFIED 1S1260002600ISIZ6gQpjqpj ~ ~k ZCA 98-0007 W35AA00301 Turner Annexation 10261003100 jtS'135 bo 1 3 gp SOBIECT ST PARCEL W > ~ 5AA0 02 , Q 1 35AA008 ~ _ a5moos LOC 1a13500aeo~ soo 0 35AA00500 1S135AAU14U0 J 1 35AilOD m W . Q 1S1 5AA01 00 MAPLEL . = N 00 ~ o too zoo 300 Faet r= zoa raet ST OAK C ity ofTigard , O Informafion m Uds map is tor general bcaUon only ard should be verified wlth Ure DevebPment Servlees Divisbn. 13125 SW Hall BNd Tigard, OR 97723 (503) 6394171 ' httpl/www.d.Ugard.a.us Comm~rty Developmen Plmame:.ay 1L199s: e:UMkXMagieOWr P-S I o7 ~ ~ SEE MAP T ~ ~ ~26 25 ~s ~ 2fDD~ ' i 35AA r' , ~ , . ~ ' ~ ~ii~ir„iirai~i r„-~~;i~ir~~~ii~iJ;iifriiiriiiir~~;ir~fi;;;, . ~ f ROAD VACATEp 467/359 . t . / ~ ~ NINGTON t,4UNTY tJREGON - - - r WAS ~ 194.16~ ~ ~ ~ iso.a' i s t i ~ I~ . 11; ! S CALE I -100 m ~ ti i / ~ ; ~ _J ~ ~5~~~ r ~ ~~i - ~ _ - _ ~°i 3O) h ~ `~l ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ o ,o 1~ ~ " ' * SEE MAP i I ~ ~ I I 26DQ , ~ ~ S , ~so 2 . I ~ 84.16 ~ ~ - t !0 i = 110 f INITIAL ~~O~NT ~O5 R' 2 TOWN Of rAE7Zli£ ~ ~ - I : _ - . . N _ r. _ . . ~ M ~ \ J ~ ~ ^ ~ \ h ~ l0 ~ pp V /bi%//.'%/// % S;%!l//1/.:;T!'~S.ii7 /Yf..~7l111 ~ - - ..~~~iHiiiiiilJiiiir/Jtiaiiiii~~ii%ii,, iiiaiiiraaiiiii i mllr~ri7riy/ii'r~~iiiair~i ii iJiriiiiiiiiariii~ii/iail.::5. /r ~~f VACATE~'~ a ~ ~ ' ~ r /~~C. 9b4~'i;fi9 3Q~ o , 8~ 8 ° ~2. `I ~ r ~ ~ , ►~a ~ ~ ~ p 3 30 ~fl~ ~a~111C. 5 0 9' 5 0 3 0 5 0' S i 50 5 3y3 8 ~ 95 I ~13Q ~ 'r. .~~Q • ~ ~ , , 903 I 900 ~ ~ 802 50 ' ' ~ ~ 8~3 4 ~ o. ; n , ~a o •o -n ~ ~ ( ~ o I 3 I .i ~ ~ m I I ~ f o 1 O I O `p ~ _ - n I i 0 ~ ~ ~ M I ~ S / ~ { l ~ M ~ ` 9 , \ ~ _ ~ ol S 84 38 W c~ ~ ~ + ' 4 ~ n , \ ~ , _ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ I 4 ~ 3 2 . \ .4 , ~3_ 2 _ ii ~ _ , , \ I j o 3~ ~ r • I ~ 1 ~ _ ~8 d _ ~ 9C~4 - . ~~804 i Z." i oo' ~~7.4 «Q., s s w~o I o ~o n i~ 400 o I n , ~p 95 ~ ~ 60' ( - r~~ ~ i q soo 500 m ~ / > 5 ~ 2 t50 n I Z 130 A~ `TBQC. t _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ (n 82 . u~ ' f Q 8Q5 R: n . , ~ z0 ~ ~o pJ'~ i~ ~ ~o~ ro ' n - e' ~ f , ~ J V ~ i ~f /1 ~ ~D ~ Kl . ' (C.SNOlOB36t ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ I I ii~ e ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ I 6 _ _ , _ -T _ 1~,. : , * ~ - - n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~o ~ - ~ n ~ i~ I n I ~ 'n / o; ! N II ~ I{6 ;v ~~0~ ~ h ~ N: ~ i ° ~ / w~ ~ ' Q I ~ ~ W 9~~~! ~ i~ i ~ ti ~ "7 ~ " . ~ ( ~o; 0 ~ 'o , ~ r ~ go ~ , ~ - ~ ~ oi v I . z~'1`' / ~ z. o n I ~ a I ~oz ~ o > > ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ m I ~ ( {~h ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - , , i .t , , , o .J ~ ' 7 50 ~59 50' J,18. ~ ~ 9~~ eo 9 30 ~O~o L _ _ _ ~ ~ 7~~~ ~ _I _a , - ~ ~ = 193.4 ~ ~ ; ~ ~ _ o i ~ ' H ~ _ i ~ n ' S~0 ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ F h~ i oao _ _ ~.~o A~. , ~ ~ - I t~ , , m ~ ' I 60~ 60'T 93.3' . . x a 50 50 50 ~ 50 . , _ . I a ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ 0~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ W G.5. 10107 ~ri I ( r' r , , V ~ 1~ I ~ ~ z - i p _ I~ h~ ~ ~ I .J 1' ~ , ~ I ol , _ ~ r' "'f' - I I ~ . ( o n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + - ' ~ ~ T ~ 1T5+0 ; ~ - ~ ~ M i I ~ ~ .i. 40 ' ~~d2 0 ~ ~ ~ W 30 ~ I R M I I 4 ~ . ~ , , 4 3 2 ~I J G ~ / ~ ~ i a.~s r~ s ~ 1 _ _ ; _ 13 2 ~ ~ - 1 ~ 367.26 100' 100 I 50' 46J5 ~ .o ~ _ ~ , ° . ~ s~ i ~ ` i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ _ / ~ M~+ r~ . c~ Y A C A1"E U R a 0 7•e-1l1~ ° m , ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~3~~ ~ ~ _ N I101 as.z' _ _ ~sa.is' i S 1 35AB -o _ . 21 i ~o ~ n tn Idr 50' . 2~Q~ I ~ ~ ~ , 1~;9 441 SEE MAF 6 I i ~ ~ ~ .95Ac. .Zrac I5! 35AA . _ , ~~a ~ ~ ; N I SUPPLEMENTAL o I n h » ~ N0. I ~ • - M I100 ,I 12u0 ~ ; , ,7 I !O2 ~ p _ N ; ~ - - ~ ~ _ I o a~ ; ~ C,S, i013B I ~ ~ o - ~ ~ f t J ~ ' r 50~ ' CS ~00~ ~ 53~ ~ 142.7 ~ ~ ~U : ~v h //////l?' ~ /1"/////f//// ' 7 i I 3 T.91 + 129.0~ s+wc- i ~ W ~ c~ ~37 07 r ' ~ ~~o ~0 2. A 4 2 0 0 3 9 3 8, 0 , c t o, / . o 3705 / ~ 2540 = / o,a ~ ~ ~ . ° C. No. 1 9 N ~ - N( S. 28 33 ~ I °q ~ 1't8~37 . ~ 39~2 ~ ~ 3902 p 7 - iz9.oa m - 3 00 ~ ~ - - ° ~ a , 9 3103 3701 3704 . ~JD~ p6 x o Y.~ { ~ 2 ; " / ~ ~ ~a ~ a < 4000 , ~ . ~ r _ ~ p5 0 ~~89 40 W p p ~ 7 I. 6 9' T I. 6 9 ` N „~1 0 10 ao c ~ ~ 3 9 a i ~ . ~3~ o rs~,° v ~ 0 9a ~ at' ~ l I ti" 4101 tC.s•No. _ ,6 5 ~9 5 ~ 7' i2101) „ I ~ ~os.~s' 9 ~ A m « 37G._ ~ ~ ~ ' 5 . ( ~ ~ . ~j m ~D I W ~ . " - ~ y N ~ r ~ r ~ p ~ , ~ ~ 1 1 ) ( M ~ _ 410 0 ~ ~ r-• ~ N ~ _ I ~ - l= . ) f r~ -r' ....J - r _ ~ i ~ - s t , . ~ . t~-~' / , s ~o . s ~ ~ I ~ _ r r r 260o z~oo g0' N69°40~E 2 4 8.2~ 4 37.91~ T4.b35' 74.fi35' 34 ~~0' , I ` ~ ~ 82-21892 2 4 8. 2 • ~ , ~ ~ 1 (J~ i C R. 823 d o 0 0 ~ ~ 0 N ! . - i - ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ SEE MAP ~ ~ ~ ~ f 2 ~ IS 1 35AC - 36 0 , ~ ~ ~ A SESSMENT F`URPOSES ~N1.Y , 3o ao ~ FQR S ~ , nn ►in~► DCI Y nti ~~R et~Y ~THER U5E , UV 1`IV I frL~.~ v~. ~ vr•. • se9056 J90.30 , ~ h ~ 3a 0 0 - If! . p kf) *0 3201 3200 O O Q W.~ I 60 ~ mi C ~O° _ 60 m ~ scs .6 f 9 4. 16' SEE MA 95.15, 95.15, 6 89 90. ~ IS I 35A .Y TIGARD 0 ~ _ _ - STREET ~ IS I 35AA , . ~ 4 . ~ L € ~ . _ l