The URL can be used to link to this page

Washington County - Greenburg Road Pedestrian/Bikeway CITY OF TIGARD AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT Pro eti: GREENBURG/TIGARD PED. BIKEWAY Date: November 14, 1978 Locatior.:S.W. GREENBURG RD. & TIGARD STS. Project No, : B-76-DS-41-0010 Contractor: Cornell Excav_: Contractors,Inc F. A. Project No. : Address : 12020 Tonquin Road Order No. : 3 Sherwood, OR 97140 Extra Work Change Order Des,_r::Lption of Work to be done: Deletion of extruded concrete curb on S.W. Greenburg Road. Speci f ications: As per Washington County Public Works Department Recommendation. Lo�.c:k t3Ty by station numbers: From Sta. 34+00' to Sta. 36+001 . Esi f« _-e of quantities and cost: 177 L.F. extruded concrete curb @ $4. 00. per L.F. _ $708.00. The total estimated construction cost is $ 46,718. 30 This amendment will decrease the cost of the contract by $ 708. 00 The revised total construction cost being ' $ 4 0 Q... . x� � 3�KIdid { � �3R � 3 & txixxxx=m x Yrs-_ructions : Four copies shall be submitted. If the work is not a bid item, it shall class as extra work and done by price agreement or cost plus basis, Cost plus basis should list labor (including all taxes, insurance , etc.,,, . material, .equipment and percentage of profit allowance. If the w., is :,s covered by the bid item, it shall be classed as a change order -and -the performed at the bid price. Con,-:i c.tur . of Public Works C x t V r.dministrator 0 WASHINGTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING-150 N. FIRST AVENUE HILLSBORO, OREGON 97123 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MILLER M:DURIS,Chairman Npr 17 1978 pEPT..OF PUBLIC WORKS BILL BLOOM JOHN F.CROCKETf,Director VIRGINIA DAGG ROOM 201. DAVID FROST (503)648.8888 RICHARD C.HEISLER RCE�Vco 1J0V2019c18 . CIrY OF tlGgR p John Hageman City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Ckeenburg and Tigard Road Bikepaths Dear John: As per our telephone discussion on Tuesday, November 14, 1978, Washington County will not require extruded curbs alongside the Greenburg and Tigard Road bikepaths. Should you have further questions, please feel free to contact Very truly yours, J J. Morse, P.E. Chief, Engineering Services JJM:ja - - CITY OF TIGARD AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT Schedule "B" Greenburg/ Project : Tigard Pedestrian Bikeway :Date: -Sept . 289 1978 Location : Greenburg Road & Tigard St Project No. :B-76-DS=41-0010 .` Contractor : Cornell .Excay. Contractors, Inc. F.A.- Project No. : Address : 12020 Tonquin Road Order No. . 2 Sherwood, OR. 97140 Extra Work Change .Orderf;-,;l Description of Work .to be done: General revisions and adjustments as itemized below. Specifications: Additions and deletions per general conditions of contract , and as itemized below. Location by station numbers: Not Applicable Estimate of quantities and cost : Actual Total Net Item Bid Units Unit Pr. Bid Amount Units Amount Change ± 1B. Mailbox relocation 10 ea. 25.00 $ 250.00 16 $ 400.00 + 150.00 ?C. Sign relocation 10 ea. . 25.00 250.00 6 150.00 - 100.00 3A. 3/4"-0" crushed rock 1,154 cu.yd. 8.00 9,232.00 519• 4,152.00 -5080.00 3R. Class "C" Asphalt 810 Tons 30.00 24,300.00 841.36 25,240.80 + 940.80 3C. 12"-0" crushed rock 0 cu.yd. 7.00 0 120. 840.00 + 840.00 (backfill for soft spot excavation) ' TRA: Compacted native 0 cu.yd. 4.00 0 635, 2,540.00 +2540.00 material in place of rock. $ 34,032.00 $33,322.80 -$ .709.20 The total estimated construction cost is $ 47,427. 50. This amendment will DECREASE the cost of the contract by $709. 20 ----- The revised total construction .cost being $ 46,718. 30. Instructions : Four copies shall be submitted. If the work is not a bid item, it shall class as extra work and done by .price agreement or cost plus basis . Cost- plus basis should list labor (including all taxes, insurance, etc. ) , material, equipment and percentage of profit allowance. If the work is covered by the bid ite, it shall be classed as a change order .and the work performed at the bid price. Contractor: Director of Public Works : City Administrator : CITY OF TIGARD AMENDMENT TO,:CONTRACT. Schedule "B" i Pry:'.je: Qreenburg.lTj g2..r . .i kP]Mra_y Date 8191'78 - Lo::a tion Greenburg Road & Tigard; Str.eet`S Project No, :B-76-DS-4c. ITOQ],Q Cgne,r actor: Cornell Excavation ContractorsIn F. A. Project No_. : - Address : 12020 Tonquin _Road Order No. 1 Sherwood, Oregon 97140 Extra Work Change Order OX Deleted: Description of Work to be dames: Schedule "B" , Items 3E & 3F (Plastic Traffic Buttons and Bicycle & Traffic Signs) Speci f ications ;Not applicable Loco tior by station numbers : Not Applicable Estima'.e of quantities and cast: Item 3-E: (480) Traffic Buttons @ 5.75 ea.= $ 2,760:00 Item 3-F: (, 4 ) ' Bike, route signs @ 50.00 ea. = 200. 00 (10` ) Bike Xing Signs @ 60.00 ea. = .600.00 (12 ) Bike Yield- Signs @ 55.00 ea. = 680.00 (' 2 ) Bike stop signs @ 57.00 ea. = 114.00 $4,334.00 :The *otal estimated construction cost is $ 17�i _ This . amendment wilt _Decrease the cost ofthe concre: r by $ .4,..33-4&V The revised total construction cast being � ��a�x�$m�x�x�a�$ �x��tx ?ct�.�� x��x�x •..�_._ xxxxxxxxxx�a1H�tdxgxdaVsx Ir�r.�•�:t'i.ons : Four copies shall be submitted. If the work is not a bid item, it shall class as extra work and done by price agreement or cost .plus basa_: Cost plus basis should list' labor (including all .taxes, :insurance . ,etc . , . material, equipment and percentage of profit a.11o%yanc:e. If the w:)�k is covered by the bid item, it shall be classed as a .change crder: and r:ho wo..k performed at the bid price. of Public Works _ <l. :. ,dininistrator Ll SEP ? 9 1978 CITY OF TIGARD (a) Motion by Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook, to approve and authorize execution of the agreement. Approved by unanimous vote of Council present, 8., APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY AGREEMENT COVERING ADVANCE RIGHT OF--WAY ENTRY - Burlington Northern - Regarding Storm Drain and Pedestrian/Bike Pathway - Greenburg and Tigard Avenue. (a) Acting City Administrator explained the nature of the temporary agreement and stated City would later be requested to execute a permanent occupancy agreement. White the City may increase its l.iabi l.1 ty, Acting City Administrator recommended the agreement be approved to facilit.late completion of this project, (b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckl.a to approve -emporary agreement- with Burlington Northern Railroad. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. present. 9, APPROVE AND AWARD CONTRACTS FOR H.C.D. GRANT PROJECT - G:.reenburg/Tigard Storm Drain and Pedestrian/Bike Pathway, (a) Acting City Administrator stated bid quotations had been checked and contracts have been mailed to Dales Sand and Gravel for the .storm drainage portion of the project as well as contract. sent to Cornell. Construction for the bik.eway portion of the project. C i ty staff has mailed request to H,C.D, for extension of time and City is waiting for reply. (b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scb.ec.k.la to award contracts to Dales Sand and GraveL and Cornell. Cons Lruc.tion as bid on unit price basis, Approved by unanimous vote of Council present, 10. ORDINANCE No. 77-92 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 10028 OF THE T.IGARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING TO SECTION .10,28, 130 TO PROHIBIT PARKING ON A PORTION OF S.W. 1.21.ST AVENUE, SOUTHERLY OF SCHOLLS FERRY ROAD, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Second reading of. ordinance, (a) Motion to adopt by Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook.. Motion approved by majority vote of Council. present_. Roll call. as follows; Mayor Bishop; Councilmen Cook & Mickelson voting Aye, Councilman Sche.ckla voting Nay, Ordinance_ No, 77-92 passed by majority vote of Council present, l.l, ORDINANCE No. 77-93 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO .AN APPLICATION BY IRENE AND JAMES McCOY FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1.970 ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TIG ARD, CHANGE IN THE ZONE DISTRICT OF A TRACT OF LAND AT 15805 S�W. 98TH AVENUE AND DEPICTED ON WASH. COUNTY MAP 2S1 11CD, TAX LOT 700, FROM WASHINGTON COUNTY "RU-4" TO "R-7" SINGLE FAMILY PAGE 2 COUNCIL .MINUTES a NOVEMBER 14, 1977 CITY OF TIGARD P.O. Box 23397 12420 S.W. Main Tigard,Oregorn97223 MAINTENANCE COMMITMENT Regarding: Greenburg & Tigard Streets Storm Drainage Facilities and Pedestrian/Bikeways WHEREAS, the City of Tigard is desirous of placing storm drainage facilities and pedestrian/bikeway facilities on the above named streets, and WHEREAS, Washington County Department of Public Works has issued''a permit to perform said work on said streets, It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the City of Tigard assumes all maintenance responsibility for said storm drainage facilities and pedestrian/bikeways. 1?19177 Date IF Bruce P. Clark City Administrator IIZs � we o�QPP.MENr o,yo` RECEIVED DEPARTMd. _-OF HOUSING AND URBAN.DEVELOPMEN- FEB - 6 1980 tie IIIIIIII co PORTLAND AREA OFFICE CASCADE BUILDING,520 S.W.SIXTH AVENUE,PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 CITY OF:TIGARD 14"30"" January 30, 1980 REGION X IN REPLY REFER-TOt Mr. Raeldon Barker City Administrator City of Tigard 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Barker: Subject: Community Development B1ock 'Grant Program Grant^-No: iB-76-DS-41- TQ Grant�ClosedLIt - -Certificate ofCompletion Enclosed please find the approved Certificate of Completion for your files. - - —._ Please be reminded that all files related-to the above grant must be, ,retained by the.,City for a period of three (_3) years.; I wish to thank you and your staff for the cooperation given this office during the grant period. Sincerely Nile Paull Acting Area Manager Enclosure Form Approved OMB No.63R-1572 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND AN DEVELOPMENT A. qAM OF RI ENT-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM B. AppLIq6TION/GRANT A'GJREEMENT NUMBER CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION _ b — [�5 _ L-J � — U�� C.% C. FINAL STATEMENT OF COST TO BE TO BE COMPLETED BY RECIPIENT COMPLETED BY HUD PROGRAM ACTIVITY CATEGORIES PAID UNPAID TOTAL COSTS APPROVED COSTS COSTS (Cot, b.+ c.) TOTAL COSTS (o) (b) (C) (d) (e) C-1 Acquisition of Real Property C-2 Public Works Facilities Site Improvements ;_ +,1 �. . 1.26 699.70 C-3 Code Enforcement C-4 Clearance Demolition Rehabilitation C-5 Rehabilitation Loans and Grants C-6 Special Pro'ects for Elderly and Handicapped C-7 Payments for Loss of Rental Income C-8 Disposition of Real Property C-9 Provision of Public Services C-10 Payment of Non-Federal Shares C-1 I Completion of Urban Renewal NDP Projects C-12 Relocation Payments and Assistance C-13 Planning and Management Development 1 ,`- f h,`d, CZ) 168,00 C-14 Administration Uu 3,381.00C-15 Continuation of Model Cities Activities C-16 Total Program Cost (Lines C-1 thru C-15) v (= t X T 13p 248.70 C-17 Less: Program Income Applied to Program Costs ! O —o - —0— C-18 Equals: Grant Amount Applied to Program Costs o 14 z, --i '�� 130,248.70- D. 30 248.7nD. COMPUTATION OF GRANT BALANCE TO BE TO BE COMPLETED BY COMPLETED RECIPIENT BY HUD DESCRIPTION AMOUNT APPROVED AMOUNT (o) (b) (C) D-1 Grant Amount Applied to Program (From Line D-2 Estimated Amount for Unsettled Third-Part Claims D-3 Subtotal 27" D-4 Grant Amount per Grant Agreement(s) =,I /o p 00 -00 D-5 Unutilized Grant to be Cancelled (Line D-=1 minus D-3) D-6 Grant Funds Received r D-7 Balance of Grant Payable(Line D-3 minus D-6)* *If Line D-6 exceeds Line D-3, enter the amount of the excess on Line D-7 as a negative amount. This amount shall) be repaid to HUD by check. E. UNPAID COSTS AND UNSETTLED THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS LIST ANY UNPAID COSTS AND UNSETTLED THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS AGAINST THE RECIPIENT'S GRANT. DESCRIBE CIRCUMSTANCES AND AMOUNTS INVOLVED. r CHECK IF CONTINUED ON ADDITIONAL SHEET AND ATTACH. Page 1 of 2 pages HUD-4011 (2-77) U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT F. REMARKS CHECK IF CONTINUED ON ADDITIONAL SHEET AND ATTACH. G. CERTIFICATION OF RECIPIENT It is hereby certified that all activities undertaken by the Recipient with funds provided under the grant agreement identified on page 1 hereof, have, to the best of my knowledge, been carried out in accordance with the grant agreement; that proper provision has been made by the Recipient for the payment of all unpaid costs and unsettled third-party claims identified on page 1 hereof; that the United States of America is under no obligation to make any further payment to the Recipient under the grant agreement in excess of the amount identified on Line D-7 hereof; and that every statement and amount set forth in this instrument is, to the best of my knowledge, true and correct as of this date. DATE TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF RECIPIENT'S SIGNATURE OF RECIPIENT'S AUTHORIZED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REPR ENTATIVE H. HUD APPROVAL This Certification of Completion is hereby approved. Therefore, I authorize cancellation of the unutilized contract commitment and related funds reservation and obligation of $ less $ previously authorized for cancellation. (From Line D-5) DATE TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF HUD SIGNATURE OF HUD AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL 'file PS,al . Page 2 of 2 pages HUD-4011 (2-77) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Form ApOroved INSTRUCTIONS F` PREPARING CERTIFICATION OF COMPLr—`ON, FORM HUD-4011 bMB No.638572 Prepare original and two copies with original signatures. All dollar amounts which are entered on this form must be shown to two places past the decimal. Example; $25,000.00. Section A. Name of Recipient -- Enter the name shown in Block 1 of Form HUD-7082, Funding Approval Under Title I of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1974. Section B. Application/Grant Agreement Number -- Enter the number shown in Block 2 of Form HUD-7082. Section C. Final Statement of Cost. Column (b) Lines C-1 thru C-15 -- For each applicable program activity category listed, enter paid costs charged to the approved grant amount or to program income and claimed as eligible for inclusion in the total program cost. Do not include costs which are charged to other fund sources, such as State grants or other Federal grants. Line C-16 -- Enter the sum of Lines C-1 thru C-15. Line C-17 -- Enter the amount of program income used to pay program costs Line C-18 -- Subtract the amount on Line C-17 from C-16 and enter the difference. Column (c) Lines C-1 thru C-15 -- For each applicable program activity category listed, enter unpaid costs chargeable to the approved grant amount or to program income and claimed as eligible for inclusion in the total program cost. Unpaid costs are firmly determined costs for which payment has not as yet been made (i.e., accounts payable and relocation payments owed in the future). Do not include amounts budgeted for unsettled third-party claims. Line C-16 -- Enter the sum of Lines C-1 thru C-15. Line C-17 -- Enter the amount of program income to be applied to the payment of unpaid program costs. Line C-18 -- Subtract the amount on Line C-17 from C-16 and enter the difference. Column (d) -- Enter the sum of the amounts in Columns (b) and (c). Column (e) -- For HUD use only. Section D. Computation of Grant Balance Column (b) Line D-1 -- Enter the total amount shown on Line C-18, Column (d). Line D-2 -- Enter the amount budgeted for unsettled third-party claims against the recipient's grant. Unsettled third-party claims are liabilities which are contingent on the outcome of disputes involving the recipient and third-parties. This amount shall not be included in Section C. Line D-3 -- Enter the sum of Lines D-1 and D-2. Line D-4 -- Enter the sum of the grant amounts shown in blocks 8.b. and 10.b. of Form(s) HUD-7082. Line D-5 -- Subtract the amount on Line D-3 from D-4 and enter the difference. Line D-6 -- Enter the amount of grant funds received to date through a letter of credit or other grant disbursement mechanism. Line D-7 -- Subtract the amount on Line D-6 from D-3 and enter the difference. Column (c) — For HUD use only. Section E. Unpaid Costs and Unsettled Third-Party Claims -- List any unpaid costs and unsettled third-party claims, and describe the circumstances and amounts involved. The total amount of unpaid costs described must equal the amount shown on Line C-16, Column(c), and the total amount of unsettled third-party claims described must equal the amount shown on Line D-2, Column (b). Section F. Remarks -- Self-explanatory. Section G. Certification of Recipient -- Self-explanatory. Section H. HUD Approval -- For HUD use only. No further monies or other benefits may be paid out under this program unless this report is completed and filed as required by existing law and regulations (P.L.93-383 Section 113, 42 U.S.C. 5313). Hun-Anil (2-77) COMMENTS ON COWLIANCE 41 E ►dTERNAI CONTROL We -have examined the Statement of Source and Status of Funds and the Statement of Program Costs applicable t . the Community Development .,grant of the City of Tigard, for the period ended January 16, 1980. Asa part of our examination, we reviek-ie,j rind tested the City's system of internal accounting control 't.c, the extent we considered ;,necessary-'to evaluate the ,system as req_.S red by generally accepted ,auditing standards. Under these stand:�T( s, the purpose of such ' evaluation is to establish a basis for c.:1.iance thereon in determining the nature, timing, and ex}.:~r of other auditing procedures that are necessary for exprei_.<>ing an opinion on the financial statements. Additionally, o::,. examination included ".l,procedures necessary in. our judgement to determine compliance with ,;;!regulations, policies, and procedures proscribed by HUD; insofar as such compliance review was necessary the provisions set forth in Paragraph 31 of the HUD Audit Guide Vor Community Development Block Grant Recipients, dated May 1976, Based on our study and evaluation of t;o. %ity's system of internal . accounting control and our review of i}s compliance with various statutes and regulations, as prescribers <n Paragraph 31 of the HUD Audit Guide for Community ;Development Rllrck Grant Recipients, the City has complied with HUD's statutory -.111 regulatory requirements. j j Schedule I CITY OF Tl i,RL) TIGARD S? -ON i , O Community Development Grant Funds B-76-DS-41-0010 Program Year 1976; Program Year November lo, 1976 to January 16, 1980 Statement of Program Costs for the perand Nov, 19, 1976 'througlh Jan. ,16, 1980 Program Activity and Authorized Exr,liditures Questioned Related Projects Costs pc:ri,)d ending Costs Jaen. 16, 1980 Acquisition of Real Prpty 66,815.16 0 q Public ;Works, Facilities, 116,214.06 12_�;,699,70 0 I Site Improvmnt, City Park Developmnt and lm;_ --wvement Code Enforcement 0 0 0 Clearance, Demolition, 0 , 0 0 Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Loans and 0 O 0 Grants Special Projects for q 0 0 Elderly and Handicapped Payments for Loss of Rntl 0 0 0 Income Disposition of Real Prop. 0 0 0 Provision of Public Sery 0 0 0 Payment of Non-Federal Shares 0 0 0 Completion of Urban Renewal/ 0 0 0 NPD Projects Relocation Payments and 0 0 0 Assistance Planning and Management 5,050.00 168,00 0 Development Administration 2,920,78 a,381.00 0 Continuation of Model 0 p 0 Cities Activities Subtotal 1311000.00 130,2-41--.70 0 Contingencies and/or Unspecified Local 0 ±? 0 Option 'Activities (Not to exceed 10% of line 16) Total!'Ptogram Activity Cost b131,000.00 83_1,248.70 0 ti Schedule II I CITY OF TYG..! ARD TIGARD, CPi�r'-.IGN Community Development Block Grant Funds ::.gram Year 1976 j Grant Number B-76-DS-41-0010 Statement of Source and Status of Funds ' er the period November 19, 1976 to-3anuary' 16, 1980 Grant Amount Total Program Year 1976 funds allocated b131,000.00 to recipient Less: Total Program Year 1976 funds drowri 130,248.70 down by recipient Funds still available from HUD-Program ''re_-;,r 751.30 1976 adjusted resources Total Program Year 1976 funds drawn dowl 130,248.70 by recipient Local funds applicable to Program Yeaar -76 -0- Total Program Year 1976 funds received 130,248.70 Less: Funds applied to Program Year 1976 130,248.70 Costs (Schedule I) Total Program Year 1976 funds held by -0- recipient Total Program Year 1976 funds availably +cr 751.30 disposition-will be returned to HUD upon cancellation of letter of credit i' REQUE T FOR PAYMENT ON LETTER OF iREDIT AND STATUS OF FUNDS REPORT SECTION I—REQUEST FOR PAYMENT AGENCY STATION SYMBOL LETTER-OF-CREDIT NUMBER DOCUMENT NUMBER AMOUNT REQUESTED NAME AND ADDRESS OF U.S.AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS OF DRAWER PAID BY (Treasury Use Only) 1 -122a •2 NAME AND ADDRESS OF TREASURY MAKE TREASURY CHECK PAYABLE TO: DISBURSING OFFICE r _ j KVOUCHER APPROVED (Teasury Use Only) ^� r' CHECK NUMBER (Treasury Use Only) ii ...y.. SECTION II—STATUS OF FEDERAL FUNDS (Must Be Completed By Drawer) ESTI- MATED ITEMS NO. OF AMOUNT DAYS SUPPLY 1. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND ! (Beginning of Fedeal Fiscal Year) $ 2. ADD:ADVANCES RECEIVED, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE ^`N. 3. ADD:COLLECTIONS, REFUNDS,AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 4. Subtotal S. LESS:ACTUAL DISBURSEMENTS, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 7►� 1 6. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND AT TIME OF THIS REQUEST 7. ADD:AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT . 8. ADD: UNPAID REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED _. 9. TOTAL $ 10. OUTSTANDING ADVANCES TO SUB-GRANTEES—NUMBER TOTAL $ ? Treasury Use Only SECTION IIA—REMARKS (Drawers Use) . ',�,,,.��.,�.,�'" - ��.• .�.7 � �� per,,� � 1 dj� c SECTION III—CLASSIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (Must Be Completed By Drawer) PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT IDENTIFYING NO. IDENTIFYING NO. $ t' $ TOTAL (Must Agree with Amount of this Request for Payment) $ SECTION IV—CERTIFICATION (Must Be Completed By Drawer) I certify that this Request for Payment has been drawn in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit cited and that the amount for which drawn is proper for payment to the drawer or for credit to the account of the drawer at the drawer's bank. I also certify that the data reported above is correct and that the amount of the Request for Payment is not in excess of current needs. DATE SIG UREA �� !r TITLE Mayor DATE COUNTERSIGNATURE TITLE Standard Form 183 183-101 ) December 1975 QUADRUPLICATE—Drawer will retain this copy. /' " 1 Treasury FIRM a GPO 1976 0-210-461 (71-1) Ali REQUW FOR PAYMENT ON LETTER REDIT AND STATUS OF FUNDS REPORT. - SECTION 1—REQUEST FOR PAYMENT AGENCY STATION SYMBOL LETTER-OF-CREDIT NUMBER DOCUMENT NUMBER AMOUNT REQUESTED is1 . . . .. B :Q '4'A ='"-. : 86-(E-8667 b a .. 2*474.60 NAME AND ADD - SOF•.`U-S.AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS OF DRAWER PAID BY fTreasury Use Only) t""ba at of MID City of Ugavd portio AM Office' 12420 S.V. Iain Cascade Bldg. Tigard* OR 97223 PortLiin 3, OR 97204 NAME AND ADDRESS OF TREASURY MAKE TREASURY CHECK PAYABLE TO: ' DISBURSING OFFICE City.-of Tlgar4 U.S. Dept.of Treasury Acct. 2-139 San Frances Disbtrsin Ctr. c/o U.S. VAtq I Bank E.O. Bou 3959of. flso&= VOUCHER APPROVED•(Teasury Use Only) Sm Prawlwoi CA 9411.9 P.O.' Bin 23308 OR 97223 CHECK NUMBER (Treasury Use Only) � f SECTION II—STATUS OF FEDERAL FUNDS (Must Be Completed By Drawer)- ESTI- MATED ITEMS NO. OF AMOUNT DAYS SUPPLY J. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND (Beginning of Fedeai Fiscal Year) .00 ,r. $ r • a; 2. ADD:ADVANCES RECEIVED, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE ar. .00 3. ADD:COLLECTIONS, REFUNDS,AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS .00 ' ~ 4.•.Subtotal f�vf'; ;. . .001 5. LESS:ACTUAL DISBURSEMENTS, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE ¢°:••. 'f�{{+ ? P� ..:; 6 FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND AT TIME OF THIS REQUEST 7. ADD:AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT 8. ADD:UNPAID REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED %%•f:?;<Y:v .9. TOTAL $ .00(� Treasury Use Only $ 10. OUTSTANDING ADVANCES TO SUB-GRANTEES-NUMBER TOTAL000 SECTION IIA—REMARKS (Drawers Use) SECTION III—CLASSIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT OF.THIS REQUEST,(Must'Be Completed By Drawer) PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT IDENTIFYING NO. IDENTIFYING NO. B 76 DS-41-0010 $ 2a474.60s TOTAL (Must Agree with Amount of this Request for Payment) $ 2s474.60 SECTION IVwCERTIFICATION (Must Be Completed By Drawer) I certify that this Request for Payment has been drawn in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit cited and'that the amount for which drawn is proper for payment to the drawer or for credit to the account of the drawer at the drawer's bank. I also certify that the data reported above is correct and that the amount of the Request for Payment is not in excess of current needs. DATE SIGNATURE / . j TITLE Juppe 4, 1979 fr DATE COUNTERSIGNATURE ' ° - TITLE fj�l r Aer-order/Tr+eassr m Jutt+e 4, 1979 41 ,e,�.c/ Z . Standard Form 183 183-101 December 1975 QUADRUPLICATE rawer will retain this copy. 1 1\ I Treasury FRM 6-2000 . . a GPO:197CO,2104.91,(71-1) .... i A- REQUEST FOR PAYMENT ON LETTER OF CREDIT AND STATUS OF FUNDS REPORT SECTION I—REQUEST FOR PAYMENT AGENCY STATION SYMBOL LETTER-OF-CREDIT NUMBER DOCUMENT NUMBER AMOUNT REQUESTED 5 $ 23 780.75 NAME AND ADDRESS OF U.S.AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS OF DRAWER PAID BY (Treasury Use Only) Dept. of HUD City of Tigard Portland Area Office 12420 Saw' ?lain St. Cascade Bldg. Tigard, Oregon 97223 Portland, Or 97204 NAME AND ADDRESS OF TREASURY MAKE TREASURY CHECK PAYABLE TO: DISBURSING OFFICE U. S. Dept of Treasury City of Tigard Acc139 San Francisco Disbursing C C/o U.t S. National Hank PO Box 3858 C/0 a o VOUCHER APPROVED (Teasury Use Only) San Francisco, CA 94119 of Oregon 1'O Box 23308 CHECK NUMBER (Treasury Use Only) SECTION 11—STATUS OF FEDERAL FUNDS (Must Be Completed By Drawer) ESTI- MATED ITEMS NO. OF AMOUNT DAYS SUPPLY 1. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND (Beginning of Fedeal Fiscal Year) $ �� 2. ADD:ADVANCES RECEIVED, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE i0 3. ADD:COLLECTIONS, REFUNDS,AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 4. Subtotal ' nn 5. LESS:ACTUAL DISBURSEMENTS, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE ` 6. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND AT TIME OF THIS REQUEST ` 7. ADD:AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT ` 75) 8. ADD: UNPAID REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED ` 75• 00 9. TOTAL $ • Treasury Use Only 10. OUTSTANDING ADVANCES TO SUB-GRANTEES—NUMBER O TOTAL $ •00 SECTION IIA—REMARKS (Drawers Use) SECTION III—CLASSIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (Must Be Completed By Drawer) PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT IDENTIFYING NO. IDENTIFYING NO. h 76 M 41 • 0010 $ $ TOTAL (Must Agree with Amount of this Request for Payment) $ SECTION IV—CERTIFICATION (Must Be Completed By Drawer) I certify that this Request for Payment has been drawn in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit cited and that the amount for which drawn is proper for payment to the drawer or for credit to the account of the drawer at the drawer's bank. I also certify that the data reported above is correct and that the amount of the Request for Payment is not in excess of current needs. DATE SIGNATURE TITLE 22-26-78 f Recorder-Treasurer DATE COUNTERSIGNATURE TITLE 12-26-78y`^r'', � Mayor Standard Form 183 183-101 December 1975 QUADRUPLICATE—Drawer will retain this copy. I Treasury FRM 6-2000 GPO:1976 0-210-461 (71-1) RE&T FOR PAYMENT ON LETTE DIT AND STATUS OF FUNDS REPORT SECTION I — REQUEST FOR PAYMENT AGENCY STATION SYMBOL [LETTER-OF-CREDIT NUMBER DOCUMENT NUMBER AMOUNT REQUESTED NAME AND ADDRESS OF U. S. AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS OF DRAWER PAID BY (Treasury Use Only) `� ".' City of Tigard artlrnd Area Jffi,. ..srscane Bid&. 22420 S.!„. fainC. 20 S.W. 6th NAME AND ADDRESS OF TREASURY E SURY MAKE TREASURY CHECK PAYABLE TO: DISBURSING OFFICE Treasury ,n 7raacisco DisBursiw-. Account 2.13' s«'. BO3858C/o U.S. Nc Iri+mal &grIz VOUCHER APPROVED (Treasury Use Only) ,In FrSnCiNCK.'r;, CA 4I Ore o7 i•3. BOX 233081 CHECK NUMBER (Treasury Use Only) SECTION If - STATUS OF FEDERAL FUNDS(Must Be Completed By Drawer) ESTI- MATED ITEMS NO. OF AMOUNT DAYS SUPPLY 1. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND (Beginning of Federal Fiscal Year) $ 2. ADD: ADVANCES RECEIVED, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 3. ADD: COLLECTIONS, REFUNDS,AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS A Subtotal 6- LESS: ACTUAL DISBURSEMENTS, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 6. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND AT TIME OF THIS REQUEST 7. ADD: AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT ................ S. ADD: UNPAID REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED 9. TOTAL $ Treasury Use Only 10. OUTSTANDING ADVANCES TO SUB-GRANTEES- NUMBER TOTAL $ SECTION IIA — REMARKS(Drawers Use) SECTION III — CLASSIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (Must Be Completed By Drawer) PROGRAM , GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT IDENTIFYING NO. IDENTIFYING NO. TOTAL (Must Agree with Amount of this Request for Payment) $ SECTION IV — CERTIFICATION (Must Be Completed By Drawer) I certify that this Request for Payment has been drawn in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit cited and that the amount for which drawn is proper for payment to the drawer or for credit to the account of the drawer at the drawer's bank. I also certify that the data reported above is correct and that the amount of the Request for Payment is not in excess of current needs. DATE SIGNAT E TITLE DATE COUNTERSIG A URE TITLE TFS FORM 75578 FORMERLY TREASURY FORM GFO 7578, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY—FISCAL SERVICE 7-76 REV.3-74,WHICH IS OBSOLETE BUREAU OF GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OPERATIONS QUADRUPLICATE—Drawer will retain this copy. REQI" "T FOR PAYMENT ON LETTER OF ► -DIT AND STATUS OF FUNDS REPORT SECTION I — REQUEST FOR PAYMENT AGENCY STATION SYMBOL LETTER-OF-CREDIT NUMBER DOCUMENT NUMBER AMOUNT REQUESTED NAME AND ADDRESS OF U. S. AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS OF DRAWER PAID BY (Treasury Use Only) C1.ty 0i 12420 rz.Q. ...iilin St NAME AND ADDRESS OF TREASURY MAKE TREASURY CHECK PAYABLE TO: DISBURSING OFFICE . C.J va ti8ssi3' Ccount 2•113,31 Ndut.iG?s:. VOUCHER APPROVED (Treasury Use Only) Of ure CHECK NUMBER (Treasury Use Only) SECTION II — STATUS OF FEDERAL FUNDS (Must Be Completed By Drawer) ESTI- MATED ITEMS NO. OF AMOUNT DAYS SUPPLY 1. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND (Beginning of Federal Fiscal Year) $ 2. ADD: ADVANCES RECEIVED, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 3. ADD: COLLECTIONS, REFUNDS, AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 4. Subtotal S• LESS: ACTUAL DISBURSEMENTS, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 6. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND AT TIME OF THIS REQUEST 7. ADD: AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT .................... 8. ADD: UNPAID REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED 9. TOTAL $ Treasury Use Only 10. OUTSTANDING ADVANCES TO SUB-GRANTEES- NUMBER TOTAL $ SECTION IIA — REMARKS(Drawers Use) SECTION III — CLASSIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST (Must Be Completed By Drawer) PROGRAM , GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER AMOUNT IDENTIFYING NO. IDENTIFYING NO. TOTAL (Must Agree with Amount of this Request for Payment) $ SECTION IV — CERTIFICATION (Must Be Completed By Drawer) I certify that this Request for Payment has been drawn in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit cited and that the-amount for which drawn is proper for payment to the drawer or for credit to the account of the drawer at the drawer's bank. I also certify that the data reported above is correct and that the amount of the Request for Payment is not in excess of current needs. DATE SIGNATURE TITLE DATE COUNTERSIGNATURE TITLE TFS FORM 7578 FORMERLY TREASURY FORM GFO 7578, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY—FISCAL SERVICE 7-76 REV.3-74,WHICH IS OBSOLETE BUREAU OF GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OUINTUPLICATE—Drawer will forward this copy to Treasury Disbursing Office. R _ REO" 7 FOR PAYMENT ON LETTER OF 7DIT AND STATUS OF FUNDS REPORT SECTION I - REQUEST FOR PAYMENT AGENCY STATION SYMBOL [LETTER-OF-CREDIT NUMBER DOCUMENT NUMBER AMOUNT REQUESTED 86-00-8706 86-00-8667 2 S 5,203.60 NAME AND ADDRESS OF U.S. AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS OF DRAWER PAID BY (Treasury Use Only) Dept. of HUD City of Tigard Portland Area Office 12420 S.W. Main St. Cascade Bldg. Tigard, OR 97223 520 S.W. 6th Ave. Portland, OR 97204 NAME AND ADDRESS OF TREASURY MAKE TREASURY CHECK PAYABLE TO: DISBURSING OFFICE U.S. Dept. of Treasury City of Tigard San Francisco Disbursing Ctr, Account 2-139 VOUCHER APPROVED(Treasury Use Only) P.O. Box 3858 c/o U.S. National Bank San Francisco, CA 94119 P.O. Box 23308 CHECK NUMBER(Treasury Use Only) Tigard, OR 97223 SECTION 11 -STATUS OF FEDERAL FUNDS(Must Be Completed By Drawer) ESTI- MATED ITEMS NO. OF AMOUNT DAYS SUPPLY 1. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND 10-1-77 (Beginning of Federal Fiscal Year) :;:%; $ 00 2. ADD: ADVANCES RECEIVED, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE no 3. ADD: COLLECTIONS, REFUNDS,AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS 00 4. Subtotal 1 00 6- LESS: ACTUAL DISBURSEMENTS, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE • 79 ZO2.1O 6. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND AT TIME OF THIS REQUEST .3.•• (5,203,60) 7. ADD: AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT 3 5,203.60 8. ADD: UNPAID REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED 7777771.1 73-RA6-50 s. TOTAL $ 73,886.50 Treasury Use Only 70. OUTSTANDING ADVA CES TO SUB-GRANTEES- NUMBER TOTAL $ SECTION IIA - REMARKS(Drawers Use) SECTION III -CLASSIFICATION OF THE AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST(Must Be Completed By Drawer) PROGRAM , GRANT NO. OR OTHER PROGRAM, GRANT NO. OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NO. AMOUNT IDENTIFYING NO. AMOUNT B-76-DS-41-0010 $ 5,203.60 TOTAL (Must Agree with Amount of this Request for Payment) $ 5.203.60 SECTION IV—CERTIFICATION (Must Be Completed By Drawer) I certify that this Request for Payment has been drawn in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit cited and that the amount for which drawn is proper for payment to the drawer or for credit to the account of the drawer at the drawer's bank. 1 also certify that the data reported above is correct and that the amount of the Request for Payment is not in excess of current needs. DATE SIGN TyE TITLE 5-9-78 Recorder-Treasurer .DATE COUNTER RE TITLE 5-9-78 / Mayo TFS FORM 7578 FORMERLY TREASURY FORM GFO 7578, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY—FISCAL SERVICE. 7-76 REV.3-74,WHICH IS OBSOLETE BUREAU OF GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OPERATIONS QUADRUPLICATE—Drawer will retain this copy. REO`"�T FOR PAYMENT ON LETTER OF/` 7DIT AND, STATUS OF FUNDS REPORT SECTION I — REQUEST FOR PAYMENT AGENCY STATION SYMBOL LETTER-OF-CREDIT NUMBER DOCUMENT NUMBER AMOUNT REQUESTED . 86-00-8706 86-00-8667 1 s 73,886.50 NAME AND ADDRESS OF U.S. AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS OF DRAWER PAID BY (Treasury Use Only) Dept. of HUD Seattle Regional Office City of Tigard Arcade- Plaza Bldg. P•.0. Box 23397 . 1321 Second Ave. Tigard, OR 97223 Seattle, Washington 98101 NAME AND ADDRESS OF TREASURY MAKE TREASURY CHECK PAYABLE TO: DISBURSING OFFICE U.S. Dept. of Treasury Sm.&ancisco Disbursing Ctra City Of Tigard VOUCHER APPROVED(Treasury Use Only) P.O. Box 3858 San Francisco, CA 94119 CHECK NUMBER(Treasury Use'Only) SECTION U —STATUS OF FEDERAL FUNDS(Must Be Completed By Drawer) ESTI MATED ITEMS NO.OF AMOUNT DAYS SUPPLY 1. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND (Begirming of Federal Fiscal Year) •`:: $ 131 000.000 2. ADD: ADVANCES RECEIVED, FISCAL YEAR TO DATE NONE - - 3. ADO: COLLECTIONS, REFUNDS.AND/OR MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS NONE 4. Subtotal 131,000,000 5- LESS: ACTUAL DISBURSEMENTS. FISCAL YEAR TO DATE '+''}''`'> "': NONE e. FEDERAL FUNDS ON HAND AT TIME OF THIS REQUEST 131,000.00 7. ADD: AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT G. ADD: UNPAID REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT PREVIOUSLY'SUBMITTED 9. TOTAL $ 73,886.50 reasury use Only 10. OUTSTANDING ADVANCES TO SUB-GRANTEES-NUMBER TOTALS SECTION IIA—REMARKS(Drawers Use) SECTION III —CLASSIFIGATION OF THE AMOUNT OF THIS REQUEST(Must Be Completed By Drawer) PROGRAM , GRANT NO.OR OTHER AMOUNT PROGRAM,GRANT NO.OR OTHER AMOUNT IDENTIFYING NO. IDENTIFYING NO. B-76-DS-41-0010 s 73.8 6.50 sa . TOTAL (Must Agree with Amount of this Request for Payment) $ 73, 8 8C SECTION IV—CERTIFICATION (Must Be Completed By Drawer) I certify that this Request for Payment has been drawn in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit cited and that the amount for which drawn is proper for payment to the drawer or for credit to the account of the drawer at the drawer's bank. I also certify that the data reported above is correct and that the amount of the Request for Payment is not in excess of current needs. DATE SIGN TUBE TITLE 4-19-78 Recorder-Treasurer DATE COUNTERSIGNATURE TITLE 4-19-78AeJ42` Lf I U,� .J Mayor TFS FORM 7578 FORMERLY TREASURY FORM GFO 7578, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY—FISCAL SERVICE 7-76 REV.3-74,WHICH IS OBSOLETE BUREAU OF GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OPERATIONS ORIGINAL—Drawer will forward this copy to Treasury Disbursing Office. ZAROSINSKI-TATONE ENGINEERS. INC. STRUCTURAL-CIVIL-WATER AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS 'DONALD J.ZAROSINSKI, P.E. H ALD G.TATONE. P. E. PHONE (503) 235.8795 �.r„rr�` 3737 S.E.EIGHTH AVENUE r PORTLAND.OREGON 97202 August 15, 1977 AUG1819�j ciTy of T�cq RU Mr. Bruce P. Clark Administrator City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Storm Sewer, Pedestrian/Bikeway Overlay Dear Mr. Clark: As you requested, we have pursued the permit for the above captioned project with the Burlington Northern Railroad and Washington County. The railroad permit has been ,approved locally and is in the process of being circulated through the company. We informed that we may obtain a permit of entry locally if we need same to commence con- struction prior to receipt of the actual permit. We have received a response from Washington County and are in the process of reviewing same. When the county approval is obtained, the city will be required to pay a permit fee of $112.50 and file a letter of maintenance-commitment"-"`for-R-"constructi-on--•def-ects:--" In accordance with our discussion and your instructions, the following is an account of costs outside the original contract for the month of July and through August 5th, 1977. 1. Discussions and work concerning Burling Northern permit 3.5 hours 2. Discussion and delivering plans to Washington County 1. 5 hours 5 hours 025.00=$125.00 Very truly yours, ZAROSINSKI-TATONE ENGINEERS, INC. Kenneth A. Meng, P.E. �C E� KAM:cs J.,UMO (d) The names and addresses of all other persons, both natural and corporate, having a substantial interest in the undersigned, and the nature of the interest are(if none, so state): NAME ADDRESS NATURE OF INTEREST None I i (e) The names, addresses and trade classifications of all other building construction contractors in which the undersigned has a substantial interest are(If none, so state): NAME ADDRESS TRADE CLASSIFICATION None Oregon Asphaltic Paving Co. (Subcontractor) B 0 J. .C. Knierim, Vine Presi c ant (Signature) (Typed Name and Title) h WARNING U.S. Criminal Code, Section 1010. Title 18, U.S.C., provides in part: "Whoever. . . . . makes, passes, utters, or publishes any statement, knowing the same to be false. . . . .shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both." i { GPO 899444 1 I w .4 ' U.S. .'ARTMENT.OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOP.-..IT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM SUBCONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION CONCERNING LABOR STANDARDS AND PREVAILING WAGE REQUIREMENTS TO(Appropriate Recipient): DATE Januar7 26 1978 City. of Tigard PROJECT NUMBER (/f any) c/o 9-7(c -.75- 4I OO� d Cornell Excavation Contractors, Inc. PROJECT NAME 12020 Tonquin Road Sherwood Oregon Greenbur Ti d.Pathway-Storm Sewer Proj 1. The undersigned, having executed a contract with In ontractor or u contracto for stare o wor j in the amount of$ 16.503.80 in the construction of the above-identified project, certifies that: t i ! (a) The Labor Standards Provisions of The Contract For Construction are included in the aforesaid contract. (b) Neither he nor any firm, corporation, partnership or association in which he has a substantial interest is designated as an ineligible contractor by the Comptroller General of the United States pursuant to Section 5.6(b) of the Regulations cf the Secretary of Labor, Part 5 (29 CFR, Part 5), or pursuant to Section 3(a)of the Davis- Bacon Act, as amended(40 U.S.C. 276x-2(a)), (c) 'No part of the aforementioned contract has been or will be subcontracted to any subcontractor if such subcontractor or any firm, corporation, partnership or association in which such subcontractor has a substantial interest is designated as an ineligible contractor pursuant to the aforesaid regulatory or statutory provisions. 2. He agrees to obtain and forward to the contractor, for transmittal to the recipient, within ten days after the execution of any lower subcontract, a Subcontractor's Certification Concerning Labor Standards and Prevailing Wage-Require- ments,-executed by the lower tier subcontractor, in duplicate. (a) The workmen will report for duty on or about ate 3. He certifies that: ;-) The legal ..aMe end the Bi��i�e�� c.Idress of the- undersigned are: Oregon Asphaltic Paving Co. 1220 SE 190th Ave. Porti.and, Oregon 97233 (b) The undersigned is: (1) A SINGLE PROPRIETORSHIP: (3) A CORPORATION ORGANIZED 1N THE STATE OF: Oregon (2) A PARTNERSHIP: (4) OTHER ORGANIZATION (Describe) (c) The name, title and address of the owner, partners or officers of the undersigned are: NAME TITLE ADDRESS 0. W. Adams8220 N. Wayland Ave. President Portland, Oregon J. .C. Knierim Vice Pres. , Sec. & Treas. 35 SE 86th Ave. Portland, Oregon HUD-1422 (6-75) PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE "GREENBURG/TIGARD (PATHWAY-STORM SEWER) PROJECT" AGENDA: 1. Opening Remarks - City Representative 2. Davis-Bacon Act - Mr. W.C. Headly (H.U.D. ) 3. Project Brief - Mr. Ken Meng 4. Roadway Brief - Washington County Representative 5. Construction Schedule - Mr. Al Kalkovan Mr. Cloice Hall 6. Utility Brief(s) - Utility Company Representatives DATE: December 16, 1977 - Friday TIME: 2:00 P.M. PLACE: P.G.E. Company Western Division Office 14655 S.W. Old Scho is Ferry Road, Beaverton, Oregon 97005 '�oo�� y°cam DEPAK . MEN 6F HOUSING AND URBAN DEVs=L.OPF, iT = PORTLAND AREA OFFICE :t* IIIIIIII*o CASCADE BUILDING, 520 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OREGON 97204. �O13013°1440a REGION X Arcade Plaza Building November In! 1977 _ 1321 Second Avenue . Seattle,Washington 98101 IN REPLY REFER TO: Ed Walden City Administrator (Acting) City of Tigard' P. 0. Box 23397 Tigard, OR 97223 Dear Mr. Walden: Thank you for your November 8, 1977 letter. Your B-76-DS-41-0010 grant does not terminate automatically. We do how- ever consider performance as .a measure of capacity to carry out a project. You state that commencement of construction is imminent. I advise you to seek assistance in the form of a pre-construction conference or other form from William C. Headly, our Labor Relations Specialist. He can be phoned at 221-2557 on Friday, when he returns from a previously scheduled meeting out of state. His duties include Davis-Bacon Act responsibilities ineludina wanes raid, so he should be contacted. at .your earliest convenience. If I can be of further assistance please call me at 221-2701. Sincerely, Clifford T. Safranski Acting Representive Community Planning and Development A - Nawember 8, '197T Mr,.. Floyd `$. Arms, DlYeatoic C.P•D• Depar.ca4ent of Housitag`� Urba+a Devoioplueat Avenue Pdttlivi d Oregoa•-97$04 - - ... . tt�fereptte0 :CouimUigity-.1�veib�taept - ' - , P 6J 6 tt No B«71 -DS*41.►0010.: Dear.:Mr. Acme e This ! to lnfczs�'you of the .curseot etetus'of our Housing_,end community Development Block Groot Pr9Bram"; pxojeot baledt- "8toxxs ;�ear�r th Fedeetriea/Bike�aay Overlay '(o�►)''5.�1::'r' igard- &tire�t. et►6 6.W. Geenbusg I;oad"�. aa6�• fti�rth r� to sequeat a .six 'moiih.Axton on of the time . e®teblished by H U.D. fot :Complation :thereof, ' - Briefly, the,City•Couip'4t of. the City of Tigard, Orej at aheir regular " m®etiag;of Qictober t0,_'f97y,: a�geritit eonatiuition bids to' Dale:'a $arse Orevel' Company and `Co.ro6lt Bkcavaii6n.' any::for.`she.moxk pray et�d to be ' don®: 1Bsieaution:v, flus nese so ry.00ntraot domi"to on to curr+�atly. iia•- progress and, Cotiace>remegt`of eo>tis.tc,tio�t 'i`o eoaineot " ' Tberefo;ej¢ in light of the_progxeps made,,to date_ , you #avoroble cotAi'a�d®satioq of: thi's .request >?ox-eicteoeton-.offhe 'gl4tioii deadlinue �ootr�id`ba.'eppreiciatad.- �: City' A�inis.trstor.(AaCing� ': G (a) 'Public. Hearing Opened. (b) Planning Director summarized proposals for.new standards of signs within City^ (c..) Public Testimony: Proponents.- Jerry Scott, Chairman of Sign Revision CommIttee spoke in favor of the revisions. Allan Paterson, member of Sign Revision Committee spoke in favor of the proposals stressing the citizen participation and encouraging adoption. Oppc,r,e.r<t.s: None (d) Public. Hearing Closed (e) ORDINANCE No. 77-89 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 16, SIGN REGULATIONS, OF THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY:. Several amendments were made to the proposed ordinances Section 1A, Page 3, ar,aend 16.12:.010 removing Building Official. and inserting the words Planning Director; delete 16.08.040 which refers to enforcement by Building Official; page .3, rr.umber 2 changed to read "certified" mail not registered; emergency clause added. Mot:icn by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Wakem to adopt Ordinance No. 71-89 as amended. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. .0,, ACCEPTANCE OF SEWER EASEMENT - Mrs. Elsie Ames (a) Motion to approve and authorize execution by Mayor and City Recorder: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Wakem. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. .l.l , ACCOU.NTING SYSTEMS IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL (,a) Stephen Roberts, Coopers & Lybrand, submitted proposal which stressed the irrardediate need to upgrade the accounting system of the City. Contract presented to carry-out the procedures outlined In the presentation was submitted. (b) Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Scheckla to authorize Mayor, and City Recorder to execute contract for maximum of $4,500.00 payment to Coopers and Lybrand for update of accounting system. Money to be transferred f'rorn Federal Revenue Sharing Contingency Fund to Contractual Account in Finance. Department (4.3.1) Approved by unanimous vote of Council. .2� N.CD STORM DRALNAGE AND PEDESTRIAN/BIKEWAY PROJECT. (a) Presentation of report by Acting City Administrator. Letter from Ken Meng, Zarozinski and Tatone, consultants for the project, was presented concerning PAGE 3 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 10, 1977 the negotiations with thL: Burl i.ngtou=Northern Railroad over rights-of-way the proposed bikeway. HUD grant money was discussed. Staff opinion was the project could be curtailed to live within the grant money. Recommendation was made that the project be started immediately and that negotiations co n;.nu�a with the railroad. (b) Motion by Councilman Scheckl.a, seconded by Councilman Cook to authorize letting of bids for the project, continue negotiations with the railroad and live within the budget for the project. Approved by unanimous vote of Council, A.3, HIRINC OF TEMPORARY INSPECTOR FOR THE HCD PROJECT. (a) Pze, �nftat:ion. by Acting City Administrator. Recommendation to Council that the City seek and hire a Tech II in the appropriate wage frame for use on this project with the idea that this "temporary" status -be reviewed by the new City Administrator. (b) Motion by Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Cook to advertise for and hire a Tech II on a temporary basis with permanent status to be decided by new City Administrator. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 1.4. APPROVAL OF SANITARY SEWER COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT & AUTHORIZE EXECUTION BY MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER - SW 115th Avenue Extension, Larry Kalsch (a) Acting City Administrator recommended approval, (b) Mot.ion by Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Mickelson to approve, and a:_.thorize execution by Mayor and City Recorder. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 1.'5. APPROVAL OF SANITARY SEWER CONTRACT AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION BY MAYOR AND CITY RECORDER - SW 115th Avenue & SW North Dakota Street, Larry Kalsch. (a) Acting City Administrator recommended approval. (b) Motion by Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Mickelson to approve, and authorize execution by Mayor and City Recorder. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 1.6. ACCEPT STREET DEDICATION - Hallberg Homes, Inc. - 15 foot right-of-way dedication SW Hall Boulevard. (a) Motion by Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Mickelson to accept. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 1.1. RECRUITMENT EXPENDITURES FOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR.: (a) Council agreed to cover recruitment expenditures and charge City Administrator Division 4.2. PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 10, 1977 ZAROSINSKI-TATONE ENGINEERS, INC. STRUCTURAL-CIVIL-WATER AND SEWERAGE SYSTEMS DONALD J:ZARO SINSKI, P.E. - RONALD G.TATONE, P. E. . PHONE(503) 235.8795 3737 S.E.EIGHTH AVENUE PORTLAND,OREGON 97202 October 5 , 1977 v. Mr. Ed Walden Acting Administrator City: of Tigard I 0 12420 S..W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Storm Sewer - Bikeway Greenburg and Tigard Dear Ed: As you know, the Tigard City Council at their regular meeting on Monday, October 3, 1977 , took under advisement the awarding of the contracts for the above captioned project. The Council directed that certain informa- tion be obtained before their meeting of Monday, October 10 , 1977 . Subsequent to the October 3rd Council Meeting, I met with Mr. Clifford Safranski of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to discuss the concerns of the council. The Department (HUD) does not review con- tracts for construction or construction work in block grants. In Mr. Safranski ' s opinion there would be no" objection by the department if the City found it necessary to shorten the amount of pedestrian/bike- way construction in order to stay within the funds allocated by the grant. Although the department is short of field personnel , there are two types of audits which they would hope to make during the project. One type is a procedures ,audit to make sure the city is following the providions of the federal requirements. Such items as Federal Labor Standards, Davis Bacon Act, Equal ,Opportunities regulations, etc. The second type of audit is financial in nature and involves reviewing the City audit pertaining to receipt and expenditures of block grant funds. This review is primarily to make sure the funds are used for the purpose intended and not to review each unit item of construction. Procedures for periodic drawing on grant funds are outlined in materials already in the possession of the .City No draw can be less than $10 ,000. therefore the City should plan ahead to be able to have the funds to pay the contractor his monthly partial payment. Cliff suggests your financial official should contact Mr. Cal Ross ( 221-2601) in the near future to be sure the City is aware of the procedures and methods for handling the financial portion of the project. �C E� u 4N C\\M Mr. Ed Walden Re: Storm Sewer/Bikeway Page Two We had previously cleared the project with many federal , .state and local agencies but, at the suggestion of Mr. Safranski , I have transmitted copies of the Environmental Review to several of these agencies with copies to you. The other matter of concern to the Council was inspection. It is obvious that the contractors can complete the work in the time requested pro- viding there are sufficient number of days in which the weather permits working. The contractors know that if weather does cause them to run over the time, the city will .grant extensions. As far as inspection is concerned, we should only consider the actual number of working days. In this .regard, it is difficult to estimate working days without knowing the resources (men & equipment) the con- tractors intend to devote to the project. Traffic and resident -con- venience esident con-venience are also improtant factors affecting working time, especially on Greenburg Road. The agreement between the City and our firm, among other things, calls for periodic inspections at the site to check the contractorks work for general compliance with the contract documents., under "Basic Services. " We have estimated the number of working days for the project to_ be as follows: Tigard Street Storm Sewer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 days Greenburg Road Storm Sewer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 days Bikepath, both streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 days Total Estimate:- 122 days While the presence of an inspector 100% of the tine the contractor' s are working would give the best assurance of compliance, portions of his time would be rather unproductive and, therefore .not really necessary. It is our experience that a good inspector on the job approximately 509'x . to 75% of the time can assure proper compliance and deal with contractor, citizen and city problems. Estimating 60% of the construction time would be approximately 73 days or 584 man hours. There would be times Mr: Ed Walden Re: Storm Sewer/Bikeway Page Three when the inspector would work several days in a row and other times when he would be required part of the day or not at all. Our firm can provide this inspection work at the rate equivalent to the "Design Draftsman" set forth in Exhibit "A of the agreement ($15.50 per hour) of course, the city has other options in providing project inspection. We hope the information contained) herein will enable the Council to make the necessary determinations and proceed with the project. i Very truly yours, ZAROSINSKI-TAT0KE ENGINEERS , INC. Kenneth A. Meng, P.E. KAM/cs cc. Mr. John Hagman City of Tigard U.S. DE OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMEN COMMU DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF GRANT CONDITIONS ( � f r g y Development r ) (Pursuant to Section 104 h o 'Title l o the Housing and, Devedo ment A, 1974 TO: 1. (Name of Applicant) andto(Name and title of chief ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF APPLICANT executive officer of Applicant) City of Ttgard 12420 SW Main Street Bruce P. Clark Ctty Adm !ni s,trator Ti'4ard4, Oregor 97223 WITH COPY TO: 2. (Name of Grantee if other than Applicant) ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF GRANTEE (Applicant) Re:(Project, Title or Name) LOCATION(City, County and State) B-76-DS-41-00.10 Tigard, Washington County, Oregon on June 24, 1977 this office received your Request for Release of (Date Request for Release of Funds and Certification received) Funds and Certification pertaining to the above project. ® No objections to the release of such funds or to the Certification have been received and a period of 15 days from and after the receipt of such request and Certification has expired. ❑ All'objections to the release of such funds and to the Certification which were received by HUD within a period of 15 days from and after the receipt of such request and Certification have been considered,by HUD. Any and all conditions in the Grant Agreement for Application/Grant No.B-76-DS-41-0010authorized by HUD on November 1 1 , 1'976 , respecting said project and funding thereof, to the extent nt the same are based upon the pendency of environmental review and clearance, are hereby removed. This notice constitutes your authority to.use funds in the amount of$123,029 granted to you under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, for the above project. i I TYPE NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE OF AU RIZING OFFICER DATE OFFICIAL E. Daryl Mabee, Director July T&j 1977 HUD-7015.16 .(7-75). That the undersigned chief executive officer of applicant is authorized to,and does,consent to assume the status of a responsible federal official,under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,insofar as the provisions of said Act apply to the HUD responsibilities for environmental review,decision-making and action assumed and carried out by the applicant;that by so consenting,the undersigned chief executive officer of applicant assumes the responsibilities,where applicable,for the conduct of environmental reviews,decision-making,and action as to environmental issues,preparation and circulation of draft and final environmental impact statements,and assumption of lead agency responsibilities for prep- aration of such statements on behalf of Federal agencies other than HUD when such agencies consent to such assumption; That the undersigned chief executive officer of applicant is authorized to consent,personally,and on behalf of the appli- cant,to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts,for the enforcement of all the aforesaid responsibilities;and that the undersigned does so consent,.on behalf of applicant and of the undersigned,in the official capacity of the undersigned. Bruce P. Clark, City Administrator 12420 S.W. Main Street, Tigard, Oregon 97 223 (Signature,Title and Address of Chief Executive Officer of Applicant) 7. AUTHENTICATION: Bruce P. Clark ,being the chief executive officeC]fty Of Tigardis duly authorized to execute (Name of chief executive officer (name ofapplicant) the foregoing Request for Release of Funds and Certification,and he did execute the same. CITY RECORDS ealJ 12420 S.W. Main Stree , Tigard.,.- Oregon 97223 (Signature,Title,Address and Seal of Clerk or other authenticating official of applicant) 8. CERTIFICATE OF ATTORNEY: A. Ig Bruce P. Clark being the chief executive officer Ci Of Tigard as executed the fore- (Name ofcheif executive officer) (name ofapp icant going Request for Release of Funds and Certification and has consented,as therem stated,personally and on behalf of the applicant,in his official capacity as such chief executive officer only,and not otherwise., Further, the applicant and said chief executive officer are authorized and empowered by law to make the said Request for Release of Funds and Certification and the same was duly made by them in accordance with such authority and power. No claim of legal incapacity pursuant to 24 CFR 58.5(b)has been made by this applicant. B. ❑ (Name of chief executive officer),being the chief executive officer of (name ofapplicant) has executed the fore- going Request for Release of Funds and Uertification and has consented,as therein stated,personally and on be- half of the applicant,in his official capacity as such chief executive officer only,.and not otherwise. Further,the applicant and said chief executive officer are authorized and empowered by law to make the said Request for .Release of Funds and Certification and the same was duly made by them in accordance with such authority and power. This applicant made a claim of lack of legal capacity pursuant to 24 CFR 58.5(b)and such claim was denied by HUD. There has been no final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction or legislation which has become effective since the denial of such claim which may affect the denial. C. ❑ This applicant made a claim of lack of legal capacity pursuant to 24 CFR 58.5(b)prior to submitting its grant application. Such claim was denied by HUD on the basis of its assessment of applicable law. On the basis of that denial being the chief executive officer of has executed the (Name ofchief executive officer) (name ofapplicant) foregoing Request for Release of Funds and Certification,has consented as therein stated,personally and on be- half of the applicant,in his official capacity as chief executive officer only;and not otherwise,and has determined 'that Such execution and consent are authorized and empowered,by law. Undersigned certifies only that the foregoing statement is factually correct and that there has been no final decision by a court of competent jurisdiction or legislation which has become effective sincethe D denial which may affe t the d 'al. _ . One _ ? 712--T (Signature,Title and Address of Attorney C,' WARNING Secti6n'i601 of Title 19 of the United States Code and Criminal Procedure shallapply to the foregoing certification. Title lg provides, among other things,that whoever knowingly and willfully makes or uses a document or writing containing any false,fictitious,or fraudulent state- ment or entry,in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States,shall be fined not more than$10,000 or im- prisoned not more than five years or both. HUD 7015.15 (10-75) . .. .. m9.F-9-fl AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, t COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Seha----Joseph h- f-er ------ -------------- ------------- ------ ; being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher _.. - of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined ° by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was '. published in the entire issue of said newspaper for --.......- successive and consecutive weeks in the following issues ----.---- --- ------- -----_-- Vt� ezt trkttt{§Cz �ai � it�.. tsui June 4, 1977 1i1� vxsri4fr � ueh � cl � � �� 4 � Subscribed and sworn to before me this --8th................... day of June 77 ---- --------- - .. .... ------ - -- - of Oregon e t rtl IYtLtle i iii ��{ Notar lic Y g My commission expires ---- -- 19 s Form Approved OMB.No. 63-S-750.14: DL_ - RTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMLZNT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM �REOUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS AND CERTIFICATION (Pursuant to Section 104(h)of Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of.1974) ENVIRONMENTAL 1. NAME OF APPLICANT hAjI Ji A IG ANT NO, City of Tigard, Oregon No. B-76-DS-41-0010 3: APPLICANT's ADDRESS (Include Street,City',State and Zip Code) 4. DATE OF REQUEST/CERTIFI- CATION 12420',"8.W,, Main--Stre"et Tigard, Oregon 97223 June 20, 1977 5. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS. Release of approved grant funds for the following project is requested: PROJECT Storm Sewer with Pedestrian/Bikeway Overlay S.W. Tigard-Street and S.W. Greenburg Road 6. CERTIFICATION. With reference to said project it is hereby certified: That the applicant has at least five'(5) days prior to submitting.this request for release of funds and certification, published in a newspaper of general circulation in the community affected;'a--notice'to'tE public'(a`copq of which is attached hereto).in accordance,with-24 CFR 58.30(a); That the applicant has fully'carried out it's responsibilities for environmental review, decision-making and action pertaining to the project named.in the above request for release of.funds; That the level of environmental clearance carried out by applicant in connection.with'said.project did did not require the.preparation and dissemination of an environmental impact statement; That the dates upon which all statutory and regulatory time periods for review, comment, or other response or action in regard to the aforesaid clearance commenced and expired as indicated below; that allsuch dateswhich are applicable to the aforesaid clearance are indicated below; and that with the eipiration of each of the time periods indicated below, applicant is in compliance with the requirements of 24 CFR.Part 58; Commence Expire Item MO/DAY/YR MO/DAY/YR Notice of Finding of No Sigtrifieant Environmental 6/4/77 Impact: Publication. Sairie: Comment period 6/4/77 6/20/77 Notice of Intent to File EIS: Publication N/A Draft EIS: Comment period N/A Same:- 90-day period(CEQ) N/A Final EIS- 30-day period(CEQ) N/A 5-Day Notice to Public: Publication 6/477 6/20/77 Other: (Specify) �a . HUD 7015.15 (W-75) NOTICE OF rINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND IZQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS. Date:: June 4, 1977, City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97233 TO ALL , INTERESTED AGENCIES$ GROUPS AND PERSONS: The above-named City proposes to request the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to release Federal funds under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 ( PL 93-383) to be used for the following project: Storm Sewer with Pedestrian/Bikeway Overlay on S.W. Tigard Street and Greenburg Road from S.W. Tiedeman Avenue southerly, estimated cost $123 ,029.00. It has been determined that such request for release of funds will not constitute an action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and, accordingly, the above-named City has . decided not to. prepare an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (PL 91-190) . The reasons for such decision not to prepare such Statement are as follows: 1. The project will greatly improve the handling of storm run-off and decrease damage to public and private property. 2. The project will provide a safer means for those neighbor- hood residents desiring or needing an alternative to the automobile for close shopping or other trips. 3. The project will provide a safer alternative for bus riders both in terms of boarding and walking to their destination. 4. Adverse effects of the project are .minimal. 5. No significant adverse effect on the natural environment of the neighborhood or the services now rendered. 6. The project is compatible with the Regional , County and City bikeway plans. 7. The project is in keeping with the adopted Greenburg- Brookside Neighborhood Plan. An Environmental Review. Record respecting the within project has been made by the above-named City which documents the environ- mental review of the project and more fully sets forth the reasons why such Statement is not required. , 'This Environmental Review Re- cord is on file at the above address and is available for public -1- , i examination and copying, upon request between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. No further environmental review of such project is proposed to be conducted, prior to the request for release of Federal funds. The City of Tigard will undertake the project described above with_ Block Grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) , under Title I of the Housing and 'Community Develop- ment Act of 1974. The7City of Tigard is certifying to HUD that said city and Bruce P. Clark, City Administrator, in his official capacity as City Administrator , consent to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts if an action is brought to enforce responsi- bilities in relation to environmental reviews, decisionmaking, and action; and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. The legal effect of the certification is that upon its approval , the City. of Tigard may use the Block Grant funds, and HUD will . have satisfied its responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. HUD will accept an objection to :'s approval of the release of funds and acceptance of the certification only if it is on one of the following basis: ( a) That the certification was not in fact executed by the chief executive officer or .other officer of applicant approved by HUD; or (b) that appl'icant ' s environmental review record for the project indicates omission of a required de cision, finding, or, step applicable to the project in the environmental review Process. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accord- ance with the required precedure ( 24 CFR Part 58) , and may be ad- dressed to HUD at the Cascade Building, 520 S.W. Sixth Avenue , Portland, Oregon . 97204. Objections to the release of funds on basis other than those stated above will not be considered by HUD. No objection received after June 20 , 1977 , will be considered by HUD. All interested agencies , groups and persons disagreeing with this 'decision are invited to submit written comments for consideration by the City to the office of the undersigned. Such written comments so received will be considered and the City will not request the . release of Federal funds or take any administrative action on the within project prior;, to the d pecif ' ed in the preceding sentence. Bruce P. Clark, City Administrator City of Tigard 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97233 T.T. publish June 4 , 1977 -2- rte, r .� DE PARTMEN1 = t-IOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPA T s PORTLAND AREA OFFICE CASCADE BUILDING, 520 3,.W. SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 - v°�iAilp M�O� F-GGION* x February 7, 1977 Arcade Yiaza Building 1321 Second Acer.i:e Seattle,Washington 96101 IN REPLY REFER To- Vr p Bruce Clark, City Administrator . C Q P. 0. Box 23557 1 4 1977 12420 S. W. Main City OF r�iARO Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Subject: Project No. B-76-DS-41-0010 Letter of Credit Enclosed is your copy of Letter of Credit No-86-00-8667 issued by HUD to the Treasury Department. You are authorized to draw down funds against the amount shown. in Block 11, $131,000.00 , on Form HUD-268, Authori-zation for Issuing a Letter of Credit, by forwarding Treasury Form TFS-7578, Request- for Payment on Letter of Credit and Status of Funds Report, to the Treasury Regional Disbursing Office. in San Francisco. Enclosed is a -upply of Treasury Iorm TFS-7578. Additional forms may be obtained from our office. Instructions for completing Form TFS-7578 are found in dUD Handbook 1900.23, REV" Letter of Credit Procedures. Page 6, Section 7b. states - "Triplicate Copy - The recipient organization shall mail this copy directly to the [IUD Area Office." When you request payments on your Letter of Credit, would you please mail-the triplicate copy the Portland Area Office, Finance Officer, Community_Planning &. e efopenent, 520 S. W. . Si-x—Avenue,—Cascade-Buildiri ;Por 0.and, Oregon 97204. If you-have-any questions"concerri rig the preparatfori of the form;please contact me at (503) 221-2601. As a precaution, please keep in mind that environmental clearances must be obtained prior to the disbursement of grant funds. Sincerely, C� Cal Ross Finance Officer Enclosures (TFS 7578, 7577 & HUD-2.68) PR ISSUING AGENCY-Dv� .,rtIl ont Df' ?IT! LETTER LETTER C tEDIT NUMBER }�?�l101k .ii - pp4 ft A;rc�a'de. P:laza., M/S .319 OF L..--00--F667 :3 -1 `econd. Avenur:. CREDIT ":cattle, 'i;':: tti ztntot'I 981.01 P'G'rtlan(I jkic '.a3 Office AMENDMENT NUMBER" AGENCY STATION SYMBOL.' (FOR"AGENCY USE), EFFECTIVE DATE. . ?3G�OU-F37:10 2,,66/801.62 �:cl�L'uEtYp 7., 1977 ' TO: Treasury Disbursing Center or Regional Office Address: 11-S)- Dept. of -the. Treasury P? 0. Box 3858 San Frincisco Diebu�rsinp, Office 'San. Francinco-, Calirr. is 914119 In accordance with the authorization of the'Fiscal Assistant Secretary,.Department of the Treasury,there is hereby authorized for the ac- count and responsibility of the issuing•agency a letter of credit: " IN FAVOR OF TREASURY CHECKS TO BE MADE PAYABLE TO: City of Tigard City of Tifrard. 12410 5.[;. 'Main >trect A/C 2....139 Ti.I;�.lyd, Oregon 97223 (:;j(1 U.S. Nnt.i.o7a:11 i3av1k: of t"ixce;;<It� 23308; 01.-Ogon 9,12"1 AMOUNT AUTHORIZED TIME DESIGNATION PRIOR AUTHORIZATION THIS CHANGE Increase ❑ EACH FISCAL-YEAR $ 1.31,000.00 # -C}-. iD WITHOUT TIME LIMIT Decrease Time Designation: Each Fiscal Year ❑The unpaid balance of this letter of credit is revoked at the end of each fiscal year and the full amount authorized Is reestablished at the be- ginning of each fiscal year unless you are advised in writing that this letter has been revoked.* OR ❑The unpaid balance of this letter of,credit is carried forward at the end of each fiscal year and will remain available during the following fiscal year and, in addition, the full amount authorized is reestablished at the beginning of each fiscal year.unless you,are.advised in writing that, this letter has been revoked.* Time Designation:.Without Time Limit El The unpaid balance of'this letter of credit will remain,availableuntil you are advised.in writing that this:letter has been.revoked:* The amount of this letter'of credit Is hereby certified to be drawn against,upon presentation to you of Treasury Form TFS 7578, Request for ' Payment on Letter of Credit and Status of Funds Report, by the official(s) of the recipient organization whose signature(s) appear(s);'on the Standard Form 1194,Authorized Signature Card for Payment Vouchers on Letter of Credit,attached,hereto or previously or subsequently fur-'" nished.you. The amount of each Request for Payment paid by the Department of the Treasury to the recipient organization at a designated commercial bank shall constitute payment to the recipient organization by the United,States. 1 certify to the Department of the Treasury that the payments authorized herein are correct and proper for payment from the appropriations or funds legally committed and available for the purpose,when paid In accordance with the terms-and conditions,cited above and In,accordance with the terms of the Agreement with the Department of the Treasury. *This letter of credit Is Irrevocable to the extent the recipient organization has obligated funds,in good faith,thereunder in,executing the.author- ized Federal program In accordance with the grant,contract,or'other.agreement. 1 f DATE CERTIFIED Yanttary, 3" � 1977 Dnrxyl E, '3Cr;r1ricl � AUTHORIZE6CERTIFYING OFFICER TYPED NAME'AND"TITLE No Carbons Required B 197 1 FE TFS FORM 7577 EDITION OF 2-75 IS OBSOLETE- DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY—FISCAL SERVICE 4-76 U. p', BUREAU"OF GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL OPERATIONS • U.S. D' 4TMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPME' - I AUTHORIZAT'iON FOR ISSUING A LETTER OF CREDIT 1.NAME OF RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION City of Tigard 2. ADDRESS STREET CITY STATE ZIP CODE 12420 S.W. Main Street Tigard Oregon 97223 3. PROJECT NUMBER(S) 4. CONTRACT NUMBER(S) B-76-DS-41-0010 5.MAXIMUM AMOUNT GRANT PER CONTRACT $ 13 1,000 8, LESS: AMOUNT WITHHELD PENDING COMPLETION OF PROJECTS) 7. MAXIMUM AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR ADVANCE DISBURSEMENT $ 131,000 AUTHORIZATION 12• TIME LIMITATION 8. PRIOR AUTHORIZATION $ - Q ONE MONTH 9. INCREASE 131,000 Q ONE QUARTER 10-DECREASE m 0 WITHOUT-TIME LIMIT I I.AMOUNT AUTHORIZED UPON COM- a _ PLETION OF THIS ACTION $ 131,000 13. F-7(i The Director of the Office of Financial Systems and Services; 14. 0 The Assistant Regional Administrator for Administration of Region (.G 15. (Both hereinafter referred to as Financial Staff.) Is hereby authorized to'issue a Letter of Credit to the above-mentioned recipient organization in accordance with the information listed above. The effective date of the Letter of Credit shall be .[Pehri),nry `r 1077 I7.DATE 18.SIGNATURE 19. TYPED NAME AND TITLE Nile Paull, Acting Area Director TO BE COMPLETED BY THE FINANCIAL STAFF The Letter of Credit listed below has been issued in accordance with the above authorization j 20. LETTER OF CREDIT'NUMBER 21. DATEftr6'CtiVC'. Date- 86-00-8667 Ve>_'6 ru ary 7, 1977 - 22.DATE 23. SIGNATURE 24. TYPED NAME AND TITLE - i' f Darrv1 E. Zaccaria 1/3.1./77operating Accountant `,..... ; HUD-268(4-68) -' HUD-Wash., D.C. 228300 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON RESOLUTION No. 77 1 A RESOLUTION FORNLALLY CERTIFYING SIGNATURES OF INDIVIDUALS AUThORIZED TO DRAl,, UPON THE H.C.D. LETTER OF CREDIT BY PAYI LENT VOUCHERS 1,,HERFAS, in conjunction with application for Community Development Funds, the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment requires formal certification of signatures of individuals authorized to draw on the cited letter of credit by payment voucher; NOW1 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following are hereby authorized to sign, on behalf of the City of Tigard 1 payment vouchers, when dravm against its letter of credit, such requests to be signed by any two of the following officials: Wilbur A. Bishop Mayor Alan. Mickelson Councilman John E. Cook Councilman- Doris Hartig City Recorder BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Bruce P.Clark, City Admin. of the City of Tigard be designated to certify the authenticity of the signature of individuals authorized to execute Treasury Form GPO-7578 Request for Payment on Letter of Credit and Status of Funds Report. The foregoing resolution was duly adopted by ,the City Council of the City of Tigard on the 3rd day of January , 1977. ci man ATTEST: i r s City x inistrator t , RESOLUTION No. 77- 1 Condit.- 1 7 - Street lights be prc' led along S.W. Scholls Ferry Road. - Condition 9 - The applicant participate in the cost of the traffic signal at S.W. 121st and Scholls Ferry Road. The percent of participation to be determined by City Council. b. Robert Ball, legal counsel for Randall Construction Co. , stated Design Review Board had exceeded its legal authority and could not require applicant to satisfy con- ditions 7 or 9. Discussion by Council, Ball and staff regarding possibility of partial federal funding of signalization; traffic study conducted by State April, 1976; traffic impact generated by proposed development; and possibility of .all three developers meeting with City Administrator to discuss cost and responsibility of signalization. Ball stated his client was willing to participate in LID -— for street lighting--on Scholls Ferry -Read and -to , share -- - cost of signalization at 121st and Scholls Ferry Road if cost is based on the proven development impact of his project. Legal Counsel recommended conditions 7 and 9 be stricken from the record. City Administrator recommended Council authorize him to meet and further negotiate with Belanich, Commonwealth and Randall. Further dicussion by Council, Ball and staff. c. Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Jakem to remove conditions 7 and 9 from Design Review Board records dated December 14, 1976. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 8. RESOLUTION No. 77-1 A RESOLUTION FORMALLY CERTIFYING SIGNATURES OF INDIVIDUALS AUTHORIZED `.CO DRAW UPON THE H.C.D. LETTER OF CREDI`1' BY PA_nt'•ENT VOUCHERS. a. City Administrator recommended Council authorize Mayor Bishop, Doris Hartig, Councilman Cook and Councilman Mickelson to draw upon the H.C.D. funds. b. Motion by Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Cook to accept Administrator's recommendation. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. c. Administrator recommended the same four people be authorized--to --sign- on cities -checking.account. _ d. - Motion by Councilman Mickelson, - seconded by -Councilman Wakem-to-accept-Admi-ni-strator-'-s-r-eeommendation - — - PAGE 3 - COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MINUTES - JANUARY 3, 1977 e Approved r unanimous vote of Council" Y Commur_ication from E.D.A. advising staff Civic Center was not funded - Discussion. a. City Administrator recommended Council communicate with elected representatives, urging support for the contin- uation of E.D.A. program by appropriation of additional funds. Discussion by Council and staff followed. Council concurred project should be re-submitted if additional funds become available. b.. Motion by Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Wakem directing staff to prepare rough draft of letter, for Council's approval at January 10th meeting, to be for- warded to all elected representatives. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 10. Supplemental Budget - Discussion a. City Administrator referred to Chief Adam's memo of 12/19/76 - re:replacement of investigative vehicle and requested authorization to include the amount of $1 ,352 as an amendment to supplemental budget. Administrator stated the amount of $1 ,352 - to be transferred from contingency fund - coupled with insurance settlement would allow replacement of investigative vehicle. Discussion by Council and staff regarding replacement of vehicle. b. Lengthy discussion by Council and staff followed regarding purchases of noise meter, mobile home and office equipment. 0o)-inuil directed staff to provide them with cost figures Tor a portable public address system. ;1 . 1'rocposed negotiated compromise on Hunziker Street utility pole locations. a. City Administrator advised Council PGE was willing -''at no host to the City - move the utility poles in question out of sidewalk area. Administrator and legal counsel recommended accepting -PGE's proposal. Discussion by Council and staff followed. b. Motion by Councilman Wakem, seconded by Councilman Cook to accept negotiated compromise. Approve by--unanimous vote -of Council. - PAGE 4 - COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MI14UTES - JANUARY 3, 1977 DEPARTMEi. . OF HOUSING.AND URBAN OEVELO.___:ENT PORTLAND AREA OFFICE CASCADE BUILDING,520 S.W.SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 ` Il °4AA0 to December 13, .1976 9 �j REGION X ).^� Il llV Arcade Plaza Building '4� - 1321 Second Avenue .Seattle,Washington 98101 .0�-� J. �J�� - IN REPLY REFER TO: CITY;, Of, TIGARD Mr. Bruce P. Clark City Administrator, City of Tigard 12420 S. W. ' Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Subject: Corrected Housing Assistance Plan Application No. B-76,-DS-41-0010 Your Housing Assistance Plan has been corrected for mathematical errors. We are enclosing a Xerox copy of the corrected HAP for your file. It is .necessary that reports are mathematically correct as the data is computerized for statistical purposes. Please place the enclosed with your application which i.s a part of your contract. Sincerely, Floyd B. Arms Director Community Planning & Development Enclosure Form ApprIN0 yySL OMS No�63R•14Y1 U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT - HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN - TABLE I. SURVEY OF HOUSING CONCITIONS 77 A. HOUSING STATUS AND CONDITION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS IN THE COMMUNITY t. NAME OF APPLICANT 2• APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 3, EI ORIGINAL B - 7 6 - D S 4 1 - 0 0 1 O AMENDMENT, OATE:October 1,1 4. PROGRAM YEAR S. DATE OF HOUSING SURVEYIS)USED CITY OF TIGARD . FROM: TO: NUMBER OF MOUSING UNITS YEAR ALL UNITS OWNER RENTER STATUS AND CONDITION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS OF SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL ESTIMATE SUITABLE SUITABLE SUITABLE TOTAL FOR TOTAL FOR TOTAL FOR REHABILITATION* REHABILITATION* REHABIL' 1N* (o) (b) (c) (d) (s) (f) ( ) + I. Occupied Units - Total 1976 3291 N A.* 133 * / N.A.* 2 a. Substandard t, 57 n 9 n 48 n 3 b. Standard and All Other(line.1 minus line 1a) +, 3234 " 1321 / t' 1913 " 4 2, Vacant Available Units Total ++ 54 / " 15 0 6 a. Substandard " 11 " 3 tt 8 t' O 6 b. Standard and All Other(line 2 minus line 2a) +, 43 „ 12 " " a 7 3, Housing Stock Available — Total(.um o f lines 1 and 2) it 3345 Z " 1345 " It O M e 4, Vacancy Rate(line 2+3) r, 1.6% n 1.1% tt rr f� 01 "Units"Suitable for.Rehabilitation"must be included as a subtotal if he applicant is proposing a rehabilitation program on Table III,Goals for Lower Income Housing Assistance. y ca B. DEFINITIONS, DATA SOURCES, AND METHODS(Attach additional pages) See Attachment to Table I. to 1. Definition of"substandard" used. *No rehabilitation program is proposed at this time. The detailed housing data necessary , 2. Definition of"suitable for rehabilitation" used. to document the precise need for such a program is not available, but will be provided 3. Data sources and methods used. by the position requested in the H C D application. MUD-7015.8 (12-75) A Form Appror.d OMB No.63R-1471 - - U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN - TABLE 11. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS 1. NAME OF APPLICANT2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 3. ED ORIGINAL CITY OF TIGARD B 716 1 — D I S 1 411 — 0 1 0 1 0 [1 AMENDMENT.OATE: October 1,1 4. PROGRAM YEAR S.. DATE OF MOUSING SURVEYS)USED FROM: TO: /�7n NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ALL HOUSEHOLDS ALL FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS ALL MINORITY HOUSEHOLDS STATUS OF HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING ASSISTANCE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE - ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY'OR FAMILY LARGE TOTAL ANDICAPPED 4 nr less FAMILY FAMILY - - FAMILY ( TOTAL HANDICAPPED (4 or less TOTAL HANDICAPPED (4 or less (5 or mnre (!-?persons/ persons) I (S rs more /-p persons) Persons) (5 rs more (h2 persons) persons) persons) ( p persons) P ) pe/ (c) (b-1) (b-2) 4-3) (b•4) (c-1) (c-2) (c-3) (e-4) (d-1) (d•2)' (d•3) (d-., 1 A. OWNER HOUSEHOLDS (Excluding displacees) 413 168 177 68 38 16 9 13 2` B. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS 2 Excludin .uis larees 540 ,� 42 446 52 I 50 11 33 6 - ..= 0.- f6 9 I C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED IN PROGRAMYEAR(Sum of/igen CI and C2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4i 1. Owners 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 2. Renters 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D. ADDITIONAL FAMILIES EXPECTED TO RESIDE (523)* S IN COMMUNITY(Sum of lines DI and D2) 9E0 0 797 153 ✓ - - - 7 1. As a result of planned employment 2311 0 194 37 e 2. Already employed in IOC31ity 719 0 603 li6 DvE. TOTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS 1476} CD S (Sum of lines A, B, C,and D) 1903 V 210 1420 / 273/ ii '0 Percent of Total 10D% 11.0 74.6 14.3 aro F. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS (Altaeh additional pages) See attachment to table II. *See note on attachment to Table II, under (D) Expected to Reside. Crq Ol m HUD-7015.9(12-75) e II,, ,7 P...2.tf 2 U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WY' y� / r HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN —TABLE II. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS I 1. NAME OF APPLICANT - 2. APPLICATION GRANT NUMBER 3. ORIGINAL AMENDMENT'. DATE:OCtober 1, 1976 CITY OF TIGARD B I - D S 4 1 0 0 1 0 4. PROGRAM YEAR PROVIDE DATE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF MINORITY HOUSEHOLD,AS APPROPRIATE (Cher4 appropriate box) ---- (Check appropriate box) (Check appropriate box) BLACK/NEGRO 4.'u ORIENTAL 1. I BLACK/NEGRO 4•Q ORIENTAL I.`J BLACK/NEGRO 4.Q ORIENTAL STATUS OF - 2..$ SPANISH-AMERICAN 5. ALL OTHER 2. SPANISH-AMERICAN 5.CJ ALL OTHER 2.`.SPANISH-AMERICAN S.Q ALL OTHER HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING MINORITIES MINORITIES MINORITIES ASSISTANCE 3.i_ AMERICAN INDIAN 3.� AMERICAN INDIAN S.u AMERICAN INDIAN ELDERLY ORI FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY TOTAL HANDICAPPED (S or less ( ur more TOTAL HANDICAPPED (j or less (5 or more TOTAL HANDICAPPED .(;or less (,S or more (1-2 persons) persons) persons) (1-2 prrsons) persons) persons) !1 persons) persons) person•I (a) - (e•1) (e-2) (.41 (..,Si (1.1) (1-2) (1-3) (1-4) (p-1) (2.2) (0.3) (p .I A. OWN ER.HOUSEHOLDS (exeltaling displacres)-TOM 3 I N.A 2 B. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS (excludine disolacees-Total 5 0 3 11 rr n n rr n n n 3 C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED IN PROGRAM YEAR(Sum of lines 1 and 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Renters _ D. TOTAL(Sam of lines A,8,and C) g* / 1 / 4 / 3 i"" N.A. N.A. N.A. I N.A. I N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. Source: Aguila (Spanish-American social service organization), exact date unknown, but post-1971. y *Methods: See attachment to Table II, P.2. z h ) n 7 1 i I 1 HUD-7015.9(12-75) • For P�o��d'.y Y��`f�`CI� OMB No:63R-1471 Page 1 1 2 Page U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DI PMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN _ TABLE III. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE CURRENT YEAR GOAL 1. NAME OF APPLICANT - 9. [ ] ORIGINAL CITY OF TIGARD [g] AMENDMENT. DATE: October 1,1 976 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER q• PROGRAM YEAR B - 7 6 - D SI - 14 1 - 0 1 0 1 0 ' FROM: TO: NUMBER-OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED - ALL ELDERLY OR LARGE TYPES ANpSOURCESOFASSISTANCE HANDICAPPED FAMILY FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS (I or Ir" or more (1-2 persons) per.onel p perr sonws/) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) A, NEW RENTAL UNITS -- ----------- 1 1. Section 8-HUD ___--.-- 2 2. $tate Aoency-Tolgl(Sum.0—in— a and b) ---------- a a. Section 8 -- ------------ q b. Other s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing (Identify), Total 6 a- 7 ----- --- -- --- e 4. Total(Sum of lines 1,2,and 3) 4 0 4 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS s 1. Section 8-HUD 10 2. State Agency–Total(Sum of lines a–and b) 11 a. SeCHon(I --.-- 12 b. Other -- --- ----- - ----- 13 3. Other Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing (Identify)- Total Ll 4)1 o [17 4. Total(.Sumo lines 1,2,and 31 0 0 0 C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS 1. Section 8-HUD28 4 24 2. State Agency-Total(Sumo linea u and b) -_- 19 a. Section 8 — 20 b. Other - 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identify) - Total _- - az za. 29 b, — --24 4.4. Total(Sum of lines 1,2,and 3) 28 4 24 - D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS —.— [2r, I. CD Block Grants 1 2. Section 235 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners(identify) - Total ae o. -- -- 2e b, 30 4. Total(Sum of lines 1,2,and 3) O 0 ` E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 31 1. Section 135 18 4 ea 2. Other(Identify)- Total 9+ 0. - 9q b, - — as 3. Total(Sum of lines 1 and 2) 18 4 ab F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 50 (Sum of lines A4i B4;C4;U4, and F.3) / 8 38 4 HUD-7015:10(12-75) n--- AA of 1r, T)ntrr-- &..W2 1 . age 2 01 2 p gsa . r• - U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DF'-"OPMEHT - HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE 111. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSlh.r ASSISTANCE THREE YEAR GOAL 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 3.. ORIGINAL CITY OF TIGARD AMENDMENT,DATE: CctOber 1, 1976 E 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR B - 7 1 61 1- D 'S - 4 1 1 - 0 0 1 0 FROM: - TO: NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCEELDERLY OR FAMH Y LARGE . ALL HANDICAPPED ( FAMILY t ur lc.c• . _ HOUSEHOL Ds (1-2 persons) person..) (i'Lor more persons/ A. NEN RENTAL UNITS 1 1. Section 8-HUD 2 2. State Agency-Total(Sum of lines a and b) 3 a. Section 8 4 b. Other s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing 1 (identify)• Total - — ---------.--- - 6 0. b. 6 4, Total(Sum of lines 1,-),and 3) 10 0 10 0 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 9 1. -Section 8-HUI) to 2. State Agency-Totol.(Sum of lines a and b) t t a. Section 8 ----- - — 12 b. Other k31 3. Other Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing ^►' (ld,nti fy) - Total a. --_---- 4. Total (Sum of lines I,2,and 3; C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: 17 1. Section 8-HUD _ --- — 90 --- 5— - --�80 __. 5 to 2. State Ag enc -Total(Sum-f line.. a and b) 19 a. Section 8 -- 20 b. Other_ 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identify)- Total 22 a. — -- 23 b 24 4. Tool (Sum of lines 1,2,and 3) 90 5 80 5 D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 25 L CD Block Gronts 26 2. Section 235 _ 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or 2T Prospective Homeowners(Identify)- Total 0. b. 30 4. Total(Sum of lines 1,2,and 3) 0 0 ---- E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE 31 S- 31 1. Section.235 60 15 30 32 2. Other Lenti%1)_Total -- -- 34 b. 35' 1 Total(Sum of lines I and 2) 60 15 30 15 36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS (Sum nf line..A•1,N4,C4;D4,and F-3 160*/ 20 120 -/ 20 37 PERCENT OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS 12.5 % 75 % 12-5 G. EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES(Aimch additional pages) *See Attachment to Table III. HUD-7015.10(12-75) Page A5 of 16 Pages h ACCEPTANCE PROVISIONS The Grant Agreement, authorized by the Department of Housing and Urban Development on November. 29, 1976 under the Fundi ng. Approval for appli- cation/grant no - DS-41-004 is hereby accepted :by the Applicant as Grantee under the Agreement and the Grantee agrees-to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, applicable law, regulations and all requirements of HUD, now or hereafter in effect, pertaining to the assist- ance provided. CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON (Name of Applicant/Grantee) By: (Signature of Aut orized Official) Title: CITY ADMINISTRATOR Date: HUD-7062 (1-75) _-- - - DEPkR* TN..._.-4T OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVEL MENT u = PORTLAND AREA OFFICE sit IIIIIIII c° CASCADE BUILDING;520 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE PORTLAND; OREGON 97204 �Or3A3°MdOa REGION X November 29,, 1976 Arcade Plaza Building 1321 Second Avenue Seattle,Washington 98101IN REPLY REFER TO: ^��..�u 9�i Z C CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED IVU V G l9i6 Mr. Bruce P. Clark CITY OF TOGA City Administrator, City of Tigard RD 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Subject: City of Tigard, Application No. B-76-DS-41-0010 Metropolitan Discretionary (Section 106) Portland-Ore-Wash SMSA, State of Oregon Community Development Block Grant We are pleased to inform you that your application is approved for the Metropolitan Discretionary amount of $131 ,000. Environmental review as. required under the HUD Environmental .Review Procedures, 24 CFR Part 58, will have to be completed for the following' activities: Storm Sewer with Pedestrian/Bikeway Overlay �1 S.W. Greenburg $58,949 2� S.W. Tigard 57,265 (3) Land Acquisition for Easement/ 6,815 Right-of-Way Jhus. is condition dpd your-un' of funds for the gbove acti it• Wi11 reggi vols comp; etion of the environments review. See enclosed Grant Agreement. ) We are enclosing the forms that you will need when submitting a Request for Release of Funds and Certification, plus additional information to assist you in completing your environmental requirements. The following listed activities have been approved for execution without further conditions: (4) Housing Stock Inventory $5,050 General Administration Program 2,921 We have enclosed for your use one fully executed Grant Agreement under the Community Development Block Grant Program. 2 Attached to this Agreement are three copies of the Acceptance Provisions. We would appreciate your acknowledgment of this Agreement and request that the appropriate official sign and date all three copies. You should retain one fully executed Acceptance for your files and return the other two executed copies to this office, Attention: Director of CPD. Please Note: Revised Community Development Program, HUD-7015.1 Revised Community Development Budget, HUD-7015.5 Letter of Credit The Block Grant Program is funded through a Letter of Credit procedure. Before we can process a Letter of Credit approval , we shall need the following forms completed and returned to this office. (Please note attachment. ) (1) Two Standard Forms 1194, Authorization Signature Card. You should attach authenticated documentation, including a specimen signature, establishing the authority and delegation of this authority to the official signing Standard Form 1194. (2) One Form HUD-274, Designation of Depositary Card. We call your attention again to the requirements of the Assurances, specifically that your acquisition is in accordance with the Uniform Act and no indirect costs may be charged without prior approval of a Cost Allocation Plan. The date of this letter will be the start of your program year. If you have any questions, please feel free to call on this office. Sincerely, 00 it Acting Area Director Enclosures 1.NoNVE OF APPUCAIVT 2.APPLICATION NO. 3•b ORIGINAL B-76-DS-41-0010 ❑AMENDMENT DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM of Tigard ENTITLEMENT APPLICANTS ONLY 4.PROGRAM YEAR: (Revised) FROM: TO: CENSUS ESTIMATED COST ($000) RELATED TRACT/ ENVIRONMENTAL RELATED BLOCK GRANT FUNDS OTHER FUNDS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION SHORT- ENUMER- REVIEW BUDGET TEROBJECTIVE ATION STATUS LINE PROGRAM SUBSEQUENTTOTAL AMOUNT SOURCE DISTRICT YEAR YEAR (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (101 Storm Sewer with Pedestrian/ Bicycle Overlay 1 . S.W. Greenburg - Pacific Hwy. C-1 309 Assessment 2 59 to Tiedeman 2. S.W. Tigard - Main to Tiedeman C-1 319 Assessment 2 57.2 3. Land Acquisition for Easements/ C-1 319 Assessment 1 6.8 Right-of-Way 4. Housing Stock Survey C-5 Ul of Exempt 13 5 City Administration Exempt 14 3 GRAND TOTAL $ 131 $ HUD--7015.1 (11-75) A ORIGINAL S. APPLICATION NO. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET O AMENDMENT B-76-DS-41-0010 C. NAME OF APPLICANT D. PROGRAM YEAR CITY. OF TIGARD, OREGON (Revised) FROM: TO: NO E. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT UORCH LD 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 6,815. 16 6,815 2. PUBLIC WORKS,FACILITIES,SITE IMPROVEMENTS 11 6,214.06 116,214 3, CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE,DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 6. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENTS FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11.� COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEW/.L/NOP PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT0 0 9 14. ADMINISTRATION 2,920.78 2,921 16. CONTINUATION OF MODEL CITIES ACTIVITIES 16. SUBTOTAL(Sum of Lines 1 thru 15) 131 ,000.00 131 ,000 17. CONTINGENCIES ANO/OR UNSPECIFIED LOCAL OPTION ACTIVITIES (Not to exceed 10%of line 16) 18. TOTAL PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS(Sum of Lines 16end 17) 131 ,000.00 131 ,000 LINE NO. F.RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS 1. ENTITLEMENT OR DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT $ a f aY 131 ,000.00 n 2. LESS DEDUCTIONS 3. ENTITLEMENT/DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES (Line 1 minus 2) 131 ,000.00 131 ,000 4. PROGRAM INCOME 6. SURPLUS FROM URBAN RENEWAL/NOP SETTLEMENT 8. LOAN PROCEEDS 7. REPROGRAMMED UNOBLIGATED FUNDS FROM PRIOR PROGRAM YEAR 8. TOTAL RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS(Sum ofLines3.7) 131 ,000.00 131 ,000 J Q Check box ljcarts Include indirect costs which require approval oja cart allocation plan as required by Federal Management Circular 74-4. EDITION OF 10-74 IS OBSOLETE HUD-7016.5(11.76) ECTIom 11 (To be complete -' depositary) PPlAll necessary The account iderrtified in Seccio� I has been established with this bank trr.nsury as a icableJ, durunirnluti��o, inrlwlint .� p��.r .�f .ulorurt �c'hrrr urs r,-+;u� . cchi�h cc.ill IrI;u11► �'ujihlr this dep0 itary to receive City of Tigard , V.S. Givrnnnent checks direcl{v from the 11-S. Trensury Depolrtmrot for depnsil to: Community Deyelopment Block Grant , _ (Arr•ount ,Fame andlor.Number) , sement have been received an d are in this depositary's custody. This depositary's without the payee's endrir F.D. I:C. depodita are insured by'.: U. S. National Bank of OrPgnn - ---- P.O. Box 23308, Tigard . oregon .97?_23 (Address and ZIP Code where checks should be mailed) (.lame of Bonk or Treu.cury) f Instalment Loan Officer (Title o Authorized Bonk officer) (Sig ture of 1/5/77 Author(zed Bank or Treasury Ofjicrr) (Date) HUD-174 t1-691 §.ndord form 1194 Letter of Credit Number 6 T,w ry FRM 1000 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE '- kRD Fi�col Service ' Bureou of Accounh �� FOR PAYMENT VOUCRL__a ON LETTER OF CREDIT Federal Reserve Bank Letter of Credit Issued in Favor of(Recipient) Issued by (Federal Agency) SIGNATURES OF INDIVIDUALS AUTHORIZED ❑ ONLY ONE SIGNATURE REQUIRED ON PAYMENT VOUCHERS TO DRAW-ON THE CITED LETTER OF CREDITof ❑ ANY TWO SIGNATURES REQUIRED TO SIGN OR COUNTERSIGN Typed Name and.Signature Typed Name an Sygn Wilbur A. BishopAlan Mickelson . Typed Name and Signat.ur Typed Name and Signature J� ohn E. Cook Doris Harti I CERTIFY THAT THE SIGNATURES ABOVE ARE OF THE INDIVIDUALS AUTHOR- APPROVED: iZED TO DRAW PAYMENT VOUCHERS FOR THE CITED LETTER OF CREDIT. DATE AND SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL (Recipie f) - ATE AND SIGNATURE OF AGENCY CERTIFYING OFFICER 1194-101 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1972 0-453-516 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITARY FOR DIRECT DEPOSIT OF LOAN AND/OR GRANT FUNDS SECTION I (To be Completed by recipient organizatinn) United States National Banff: of Oregon . (Name, .address and ZIP Code,of Rank or-Local Covernment Treasury) has been ileMigntited an the depiisitary for all funds In be received directly from the U.S, Treasury lUvitro,jenrresulling from cifnlrai I rlundwr exrcutcd with the U.S. Deportment of Housing and Urban Development for deposit to: Ci ty Of Tigard , Community Devel pitmen t Block Grant, account a-1-139 (.account Name and/or Number RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION Citv of Tigard, Or. -- — (Namr) • ••• vn ^.9ddre, nd 1P �tfey _ld t n i_qj a-..d Oregon, 97?2 Maygr f7itle of Executive Officer) (Signature of Executive Officer) (Date) HUD-274 (1-69) pR _ DEPARTME F HOUSING.AND URBAN DEVELOP NT c PORTLAND AREA OFFICE J,' CASCADE BUILDING,520 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 REGION X' Arcade Plaza Building' NAV 1 QO (� c 1321 Second Avenue 1 1976 Seattle,Washington 98101 IN REPLY REFER TO: n Mr. Bruce P. Clark City Administrator, City .of Tigard 12420 S W. .Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 INC Dear Mr. Bruce P. Clark: Clay IGARQ. Subject: Federal Register of October 18, 1976 Preapplication Instructions for Discretionary Grants Region X Preapplication Rating System Preapplication Forms Enclosed are several documents which will assist you in preparing a pre- application for Discretionary Grants. The enclosures are: 1. A brief narrative summarizing significant Federal Register amendments. Z. A copy of the instructions to be followed in preparing a preapplication. 3. A. copy of the application forms. 4. A copy of the Region X Rating System for preapplications. 5. A copy of the new Federal Register dated October 18, 1976. I urge you to carefully review these items to assure corplete information in your application when it comes into the competition for funding. The changes are numerous and can have. a significant impact on the type of . activities for which you may request funding. In particular, your attention is directed to the following sections of the October 18, 1976 Federal Register: 1. 570.402(d) (2) (i) (ii) (iii). 2. 570.402(d) (5) . 3. 570.402(c) (1) (i) (ii) . 4. 570.402(c) (2) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv). There are other sections of the Federal Register of equal importance and .interest, and should be considered in the preparation of the preapplications. As indicated in Section 570.,402(d) (5), a maximum and minimum grant amount shall be established. Under these. regulations, the Region X has established a single maximum grant amount of $500,00.0 for all Discretionary preapplications. A minimum grant amount will not be established. If. you _have questions, please contact.your Community Planning and Development Representative at (503) 221-2601. Sincerely, Floyd B. Arms Director, CPD Division Enclosures .tery ' CITY OF TIGARD P. O. Box 23557 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 3ctober 6, 1976 Floyd Arms el CoL,.��unity '_=larning and Development U. S. Department of Housing E, Urban Development Cascade Buildin., 520 S.t•,,. 6th Portland, Oregon 017204 Dear 7dr. Arms: re : Tigard ' s Housing and Community Development Application Enclosed you tvi 11 find a revised Co=uni ty Development Budget sh et Which is part of the Vii.C.D. Grant Application. The revisions made do not alter Tigard' s requested total resources for program activity costs, but rather reflect a change in program activities i. e. lines 1 , 13 and 14 so that the requested funding corresponds to the necessary v.,ork needed to implement the project. ?lease insert this revised sheet where applicable within 1'igard ' s D. Application. If additional information Say be needed to expedite this applicat=ion, please contact 'this office and we will respond immediately to that need. Sincerely, Doris vartig City A dminist - tor, pro tem ;� /pr J A. B. APPLICATION NO. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT U.S. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET 0, AMENDMENT 76LS410010 C. NAME OF APPLICANT D. PROGRAM YEAR CT My CF TIGARL FROM: To: LINEFOR HUD NO. E. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT USE ONLY 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 1 2• PUBLIC wOBKS, FACILITIES,SITE IMPROVEMENTS "'116. 214.06 3, CODE ENFORCEMENT { 4, CLEARANCE,DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 4 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 4 7, PAYMENTS FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME F 1 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY LL k 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES f r. 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES f, 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL/NDPIPROJECTS I. 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE P 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT5.050.00 e 14. ADMINISTRATION 2 920.(� 7 i 15. CONTINUATION OF MODEL CITIES ACTIVITIES i i i 16. SUBTOTAL (Sum of Lines 1 thru 15) n 131 000.00 CONTINGENCIES AND/OR UNSPECIFIED LOCAL OPTION ACTIVITIES 17. (Not to exceed 10%of line 16) i 18. TOTAL PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS(Sum of Lines 16and 17) 131 ,000.00 NOE LIN F. RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS _ 1, ENTITLEMENT OR DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT 8 131 ,000-00 : 2. LESS DEDUCTIONS ENTITLEMENT/DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 3' (Line 1 minus 21 131 ,000.00 4. PROGRAM INCOME 5. SURPLUS FROM URBAN RENEWAL/NDP SETTLEMENT 8. LOAN PROCEEDS 7. REPROGRAMMED UNOBLIGATED FUNDS FROM PRIOR PROGRAM YEAR 8. TOTAL RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS (Sum of Lines 3-7) 41 '41 ' (�(J(J. (10 i I ❑Check box if costs include indl ect costs which require approval of a cosi allocation plan as required by Federal Management Circular 74.4. EDITION OF 10-74 IS OBSOLETE HUD-7015.8111-751 i Form Approved, OMR No. 63R-W1 '.,. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN - TABLE I. SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS `6 _ A. HOUSING STATUS AND CONDITION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS IN THE COMMUNITY I, rJl�t.1E OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER - 3. � ORIGINAL i B – 7 1 6 – D S I – 4 1 1 1 Q 1 0 1 1 0 [xl AMENDMENT, DATE:October 1 , id 4. PROGRAM YEAR S. DATE OF HOUSING SURVEYS) USED CITY OF TIGARD FROM: TO: j 4 NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS t I YEAR ALL UNITS OWNER RENTER i STATUS AND CONDITION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS OF SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL SUITABLE TOTAL SUITABLE SUITABLE ? FOR FOR TOTAL FOR REHABILITATION* REHABILITATION* REHABILITATION* ---- (a) (b) (c) , (d) (e) ' 11. Occupied Units - Total 1976 _ 3291 N.A .* 1330 N.A. * _ 1961 _ N.A 1 a. Substandard " 579 9 �� 4 • —i a b. Standard and All Other (line 1 minus line la) 3234 " 1321 " 1913 --- —. n 2. Vacant Available Units — Total 54 " 15 " 39 " i a, Substandard " 113" " " i --- -- 8 ----- - .- e b. Standard and All Other (line 2 minus line 2a) n 43 " 12 " 3 ' 7 3. Housing Stock Available — Total (sum of lines I and 2) if 3345 it 1345 " 2000 " 1 ti e 4. Vacancy Rate (line 2 _ 3) it 1 . 67o " 1 . 1% " 2 " *Units "Suitable for Rehabilitation" must be included os a subtotal if the applicant is proposing a rehabilitation program on Table III, Goals for Lower Income Housing Assistance. B. DEFINITIONS, DATA SOURCES, AND METHODS (Attach additicnal pages) See Attachment to Table I . , l ' 1. Definition of "substandard" used. 1 *No rehabilitation program is proposed at this time. The detailed housing data necessary 2. Definition of "suitable for rehobiilitotion" used. to document the precise need for such a program is not available , but will be provided 3. Data sources and methods used. by the position requested in. the H C D application . eye do@ t8PoHal-i aff. HUD-7015.8 (12-75) Form Approved , OMB No. 63R-1471 I ''9° 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN — TABLE 11. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 9• ORIGINAL B — AMENDMENT, DATE: Octobor 1 , L ),1 : CITY OF TIGARD 71_6 — D ST- 1 4 1 — 0 1 0 110 4. PROGRAM YEAR 5. DATE OF HOUSING SURVEY(S) USED I FROM: TO: NUMBER.OF HOUSEHOLDS ALL HOUSEHOLDS ALL FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS ALL MINORITY HOUSEHOLDS STeTUS OF HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING ASSISTANCE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY TOTAL HANDICAPPED (4 or less TOTAL HANDICAPPED (4 or less TOTAL HANDICAPPED (4 or less � pe J (5 or more persons) (5 or more persons) (5 ar ma (1 persons/ pe persons) (1-2 persons) P ) persons) (1-2,persons) P ) persons;e (o) (b-1) (b-2) (b-3) (b-4) (c-1) (c-2) (c-3) (c-4) WAI) (d-2) (d-3) (d-4) A. OWNER HOO EHOLDS ' (Excluding displacees) 413 168 177 68 38 16 9 13 6" 3 2"' ( z 1 2- 2 2 B. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS (Excluding dis lacees 540 42 446 52 50 11 33 6 9 6'' 5 0 . 3 3' 2 s C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED IN PROGRAM YEAR (Sum of lines C1 and C2)' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1. Owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 5 2. Renters 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� —i e D. ADDITIONAL FAMILIES EXPECTED TO RESIDE (5'2.3) 00, IN COMMUNITY (Sum-o lines nl and D2) 950 0 797 153 7 1. As a result of planned employment 231 0 194 37 l) a 2. Already employed in locality 719 0 603 116 — _ I E. TOTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS 1476)* p 9 (Sum of lines A, B, C, and D) 1903 210 1420 273 10 Percent of Total 1000/0 11 . 0 % 74 .6 % 14 . 3 % y F. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS (Attach additional pages) See attachment to table II . *See note on attachment to Table II , under (D) Expected to Reside . - WIM-7n1 r:0 119_71.1 Pape.2 or :( U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN - TABLE II. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS 1 I. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APP.LIC'AT(O GRANT NUMBER 3. -_ ORIGINAL - - - AMENDMENT. DATE: October 1 , 11976 CITY OF TIGARD 9 D S - 4 1 0 0 1 0 4. PROGRAM YEAR FROM: PROVIDE DATE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF MINORITY HOUSEHOLD, AS APPROPRIATE ' (Check appropriate box) (Check appropriate box) (Check appropriate box) lr , 1, a SLACK/NEGRO 4• � ORIENTAL 1. � BLACK/NEGRO 4. � ORIENTAL I. L� BLACK/NEGRO 4. ORIENTAL STATUS OF 2. SPANISH-AMERICAN 5. 0 ALL OTHER 2. = SPANISH-AMERICAN 5. O ALL OTHER 2. n SPANISH-AMERICAN 5. a ALL OTHI_H HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING MINORITIES MINORITIES MINORI?It:c 3. 1-7 AMERICAN INDIAN 3.= AMERICAN INDIAN 3. AMERICAN INDIAN ASSISTANCE ___-_____. ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ` ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY FAMILY 'FAMILY FAMILY TOTAL HANDICAPPED 1I or less TOTAL HANDICAPPED (l or less it TOTAL HANDICAPPED 4 or les.; i (5 rs more (1-2 persons) persons) I or more l !( (prr.nn0 (1-_ persons) persons. persons) person s) !/-�'persons) persons) (a) (e-1) (e-2) (e-4) (e-5Y ((-1) ((-2) (1.3) ((-4) (9-1) (9.2) (9-3) I A. OWNER HOUSEHOLDS (excluding displacees)- Total 3 N.A �1 (1 2 B. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS (excluding dis luc•ees - Total 5 n 3 9. 3 C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED IN PROGRAM YEAR(Sum of lines 1 and 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Owners 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 5 Renters D. TOTAL(Sunt of lines .4,B, and Q 8* 1 4 3 N.A. N.A . N.A . N .A. N.A. N.A. N.A . N.A . Source: Aguila (Spanish-American social service organization) , exact date unknown, but post-1971 . *Methods : See attachment to Table II , P.2 . ,rl r, ` f HUD-7015.9 (12-75) �- `arM ApIprr,ed vn�o i.a. 63R-i47 � =j - = U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING NO HOUSING ASS'S'AN'-- -4`+ TABLE Ill. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOIJSI1:G ASSISTANCE CURRENT YEAR GOAL 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 3. C� ORIGINAL .. ('��7 ! CITY OF TIGARD C1 AMENDMENT. DATE: CC'i obC'T' 1,1 J 1 6 2. APPLICATION!GRANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR 1 El - 17 1 6I - , D I S - 4 1 0 0 1 0 FROM: TO: NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED i LARGE ELDERLY OR ALL FAMILY' FAMILY HANDICAPPED TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE HOUSEHOLDS (A or loss (i or more (1-2 persons) persons) persons) i (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) A. NEW RENTAL UNITS __-- 1 1. Section 8-HUD - - --- 2 2. State Agency-Total (Sumo lines a and b) 4 - -4 4 - 3 a. Section 8 -- --- a b. Other -- --- -- ------ --- - - 5 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing - (Idr.ntify) - Total — ------ - - :� 6 �b. B 4. Totol (Sum o f lines 1,2,and 3) 4 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS - — 9 1. Section 8-HUD —"- -i 10 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of lines a and b) _ ---------- ' t 1 a. Section 8 - -- I 1 12 b. .Other - --- --- 3. Other Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing 13 _-- i (identify) - Total -- { is b. --- i 6' 4. Total (Sum o f lines 1,2,and .3) O 0 0 i C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS 28 --4--— -- 24.-,-- 17 1. Section 8-HUD -- -- le 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of lines a anti b) --- - 19 a. Section 8 20 b. Other 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identify) - Total — - R24� 0. b, 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2, and 3) 28 4 24: D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 25 1. CD Block Grants 26 2. Section 235 27 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners(Identify) - Total 9 P31 a — (% 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2, and 3) O O O 0 E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 10 4 31 1. Section 235 18 4 32 2. Other(Identify) - Total 3.3 a; 3a b. 35 3. Total (Sum of lines and 2) 18 4 36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 50 8 38 4 (Sum of lines A4,811,C4,D4, and E3) H111,7, 5.10(12-75) i'cye 2 of 2'pcges U.S..--PARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELO, AT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE Ill. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE THREE YEAR GOAL 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 3.' O ORIGINAL CITY OF TIGARD AMENDMENT, DATE: UCtober 1, 1976 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR [-B] 1'7 1 6 - D I S - 4 1 1 - 0 1 0 1 1 0 FROM: TO: NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCEELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE - ALL HANDICAPPEDFAMILY (1 or lc.+: HOUSEHOLDS1-2p ' ) 1,crson s) (5urmore. ( ersons persons) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) A. NEW RENTAL UNITS I I. Section 8-HUD 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of lines a and b) 10 I 3 a. Section 8 10 in 4 b. Other s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing (Identify) - Total ---.-__ S7b. — -- - - 8 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2,and 3) 10 0 10 0 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 9 1. Section'8-HUD 1 o 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of lines a and b) 1 a. Section i2 b. Other 3. Othf:r Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing 13 (Identify) - Total ---- -- -- - 14 a. b. is 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2, and 3; 0 0 0 0 C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: 17 1. Section 8-HUD _ _90 I 5 _ 8.0 18 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of lines a and b) 19 a. Section 8 _ 20 b. Other 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identify)- Total Kz2 a 2 3 b, 2a 14. Total (Sum of Lines.1,2, and 3) 90 5 j 80 5 1 D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 25 1 1. CD Block Grants 26 2. Section 235 27 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners(Identify) - Total 8 a. z9 b. - --- 3o 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2, and 3) 0 0 0 E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 31 1. Section 235 60 15 30 1S 32 2. Other(ldenti y) -'Total 33 a, 34 b. 35 3. Total (Sum of lines I and 2) 60 15 30 15 3s F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS (Sum of lines .si=r,R4,C4,D4, and E3 160* 20 120 20 37 PERCENT OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS - 100 0 12 . 5 75 ° ro G. EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES!.1t::.cr• additional puees) *See rtta _-gent to Table III . 1 __ — _ HUD-70i5JO i12-75', Form Approved C,+ B No. 63R-1471 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE IV - GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED LOWER INCOME HOUSING 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 3. L- ORIGINAL CITY OF TIGARD tYl AMENDMENT. DATE: October 12 1976. L APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 4• L�PROGRAM YEAR B 17t - - 4 1 - 0 01 0 FROM: TO: A. IDENTIFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP IN THIS APPLICATION 1. New Construction: Census Tract Numbers 309, 319 . 2: Rehabilitation: Census Tract Numbers B. EXPLANATION OF,SELECTION OF GENERAL LOCATIONS L -New Construction Area 1 A. General Location Census Tracts 308 and 319 1 . To be constructed approximately 30 multi-family units. B. Criteria 1 . Proposed location for construction of housing units is within close proximity to senior citizens center. 2. The project site development will be in conformance with zoning in the area. , 3. Mass Transportation and shopping facilities will be within walking distance of proposed project site. F E i 2 Rehabilitation I I i i i HUD-7015.111 (12-75) Total Units (b} column. The C-r•e�ron ` ousing Division provided an es t-im- to for the total housing sto^__ (2969 pl::s buil�?ing permit data "''rough 1475) - :item j. The total vacancy rate (i tem 4) v.as a U i - .11 'JrOvlded by the Creon 'Housing Division. Total vacant units Iitem 2) and, therefore, total occupied units Cite- 1) v:ere calculated using these tllao figures. No detailed substandard data was available, so in the case of substanClard occupied unitG(item- la) the 1970 census ficures for fetal occupied and total sub-. standard provided a ratio that .•,'as Shen aaplied to the 1976 total �CCUpied. i-e Tigard 3uilding Department estimated that a^pDroX- imatel;�T 20 � of the vacant Units are substandard, so this proportion was used to establishvacant substandard and vacant standard. C.•rner Units (d) Colu="1. As [tiil": total Units (column (b) ) , owner total �_,nits ( ; tem 31) and owner vacancy rate (item 4) were provided to US. Rhus total number of vacant units (item 2) was calculated . Assuminz the same proportions of vacant substandard owner units as for total vacant units, the number of vacant substandard and vacant standard units ',,as calculated. (T-In-is ass, tion isprobab?y erroneous, and it is probable that proportionally fewer owner vacant units are substandard than are total vacant units. ), Cwner occuried -grits (item 1) was derived after the number of owner vacant units was calculated. The 1970 proportion of owner. substandard occupied la its to total substandard occupied units was applied to the 1975 total substandard figure to obtain 1976. owner+ substandard occupied unit` . _enter Units (f) column, Items 3 and 4 .ere provided to Us as for total units (coluMn (b) ) 2nd cw':•ner t;ri_ts (column. (d) ) . . All other entries in this colo-Tan are _emainders from cclu-mn (b) and. (d) , -Page A7 of 16 Pages 0t:rier Households metal unuseholds (b-1) . Sum of _ lderly- (b-2) , Family (b- 3) , and Targe Family (b-4) . elderly (b-2) . Using the 1970 Fourth Count Census Data, the 1970 proportion of primary indi r_dual owners who i,:-ere elderly was obtained , and this rati e was applied to the income ranges below 80% median income for primary individuals to calculate the number of elderly primary individual ol:rers in need. in 1970. The number of elderly husband-wife owners in reed it 1970 was obtained from the income range figures. The 1970 sum of elderly owners in need who were husband-wife or primary indi-iduals was then divided by the total nuy,�er of 1970 ci,-ner households, and then a_nplied to the 1976 figure for total number of owner households. Family (b-3) . rising the same data sources as ir_ .b-1 above, and the Ore on t:olsi'_1g Division definition of family (two or more persons) , the total number of 2, 3, and 4 person families in reed in 1970 was obtained. The proportion of family owners ineed in 1970 was then applied to the 1976 fidare for total n cirner households. Large 7amily (b-4) . The same method was followed as for Family (b-3) except the tables used were for families of 5 or more. Total Temale-'Kended Households (C-1) . Female-headed household owners in need in 1970 was calculated, and the resulting proportion of total cwners was applied to 1976. But first, the 1970 female primary individual owners in need and female "Other Family" owners in need ieere calculated se arately. In the case of female-headed households, for instance, this proportion of total owner "Other Family" was computed and then applied to the income ranges in need (the threshold for a 2-person household - N6562 - was used) . Elderly Female-headed Households (C-2) . There %,°ere no elderly (65+) female-headed households it 1970. The. proportion of primary individual owners in 1970 who ,.!ere elderly female primary individual owners was calculated and applied to the income range figures for primary individual owners . The resulting number ofelderly female owners i r_ need in 1970 was applied to the 1970 total of owner households to obtain a ratio, and this 3'tio was applied to the 1976 total of owner households . P. pc _ter TH ouse_ o_d c . The same procedures s T e used to compute renter L households in need, with the renter-tabulated data from the 1-70 census. C. Im_plemer_tatien of the three-y-ear housing plan is not expected to require any displacements. Page 18 of 16 P?ges a_ r .+ T =eci �o i,, !^nr mi�nity � � cee no below) %. Adk_� _-Ional Families yxpe; ped „o - - 1. Planned E?-nloyment Total (b-1) . b 197E telephone survey of em^lcyers in t le-City o' Tigard yi el_: ed an estimate of total employrment increase e}erected in the next l i-ree Nears (19,19) - ^his total was multiplied by the proportion. of Tigard's current employees earning less than .9,000 (41. 3%) and by the S N S _,n proportion of low income employees who live in the community re they work ( 577 ) Family (b-3) • The current ratio of family- (4 or less) to total =—cloyed �-_cusehclds in need was calculated. Elderly were assu^@� to not be a cart of .he workforce, SO their Current Ictal of cv.,2ers and renters in need (A -2 nius 3b-2) was sub- ) .--acted from the Ictal of current households inneed (Ab-1 - �jus Bb-1) . 70-a! current families in :teed (Ab-3 plus Bb-7) ':?2S divided byt the -esulting ri_�'Ire of total employed households. This proportion was then multiplied by the Planned Employment Total Fo11oi,*ing the similar procedure in Targe Family,� (b-4) .. Family (b-3) above, the current ratio of large family . in need to total em, households was calculated �16. 2�) and then multiplied by the Fl2nned Employment Total (Dib-1) . 2. Already Employed but living Else,:-here Total ('S 2b-1) . The 1976 Tigard employment survey provided information on the number of lower income employees (under '"9, 000) working in the city. Of this total (2097) , 1617 (77.10) lived outside the city. The proportion of those living outside who would live in if the housing were available is then calculated by multiplying the S M S A proportion of low income wIorkers who live in the area where theyT work ( 57. 7%) times the Tigard proportion. who live outside the City (77. 10 . The resulting proportion of Tigard ' s low income workers who would live in the City if ,they co��ld, i s multiplied times the n'm~ler '�,�ho currently live out- side the City (1617) . Icwer Income households with wore-ers employed in "ioard, but living elsewhere - - - 1617 lower income households irith workers employed and living in Tigard - - - - - - - - - 480 Portland S INT S A percentage of lower income vror?-ors living in the community where they work-57.7% Percentage of lc ;er income households i.'ith worker employed in ^ward :;ut I1ving outside e_=C�'^� ^r_�e ^f iCi�-or income households with worker empicyed y O .. r 1 G �f nou5��' in Tigard but- hiving Outside ;': 10 �Tould 1.itrC _ �S d _. Iaere available - - - - 57.7 v 77. 1 = 44 . % % - page c9 of 26 Pages l,cwer income hcv.sehclds with i-v rkers em_r-' eyed in Ti`ard, but living slsetrhere, .5�ho r+ould _i ve in Tigard if the housing were available - - . 445 Y 1617 _ 7119 Fami lv (b-3) . The proportion: of familie- in need to total employed households in need (see neth-_,�3 .ander Dl ,Family (1-,-3) above) was multiplied times the total expected to reside who currently work in Tigard. Targe Family (b-4) . Following the similar procedure in Family (b-3) above, the proportion of large family in reed to total employed households was calculated and then multiplied by the total expected to reside who currently work in Tigard. 1'ote: The methodology required to calculate households expected to reside assumes the equiveler_ce of c"it�T boundaries and communit�T boundaries; hence the 'use of the S I41 S A proportion_ of low income employees who live in the communi tv where they ,,,Tork. �7hile we understand and applaud the -o—ressional intent in mandating this method to ensure that each local jurisdiction accepts responsibility for housing its own low and moderate income employees, the simple fact is that local governments_ (including Tigard) do not possess the legal nox,Ter to annex at will. The City of Tigard, moreover, has very convoluted municipal boundaries (see attached yaps) , and it is clear that much c--f' the core of the Tigard community lies outside the Ci t':, beVOnd its Jurisdiction. Yet) almost all of the employement provided. in the Tigard Alar_ area is within the city, So that calculations o f future housing needs produce figures which greatly exceed the realistic total for which the City should be responsible, or for which it possesses the necessary land. As voluntary annexations to the Cit; continue over the next several years, it is likely that within perhaps a decade much of tris ur_icue bou-da.ry problem will disappear, and the City' s boundaries will be more nearly coterm_r_ous with the co=nities. . This is not' 1 the case tOda�" howeverand in the interim the City jui sdicticn is li-mited. J , p. reasonable total for additional - ilies expected to reside in the can be obtained by multiplying the current proportion of Tigard Flan_ area residents living in the City times the total f amili es' expected to reside in the con ur_il- (nb'-1) . 55 X 95' =523. This more reasonable E.T.P.. , when added to the other su�tctals for household= needing assistance , Produces: a total for 1,hiC_"'_ the City Of Tigard can Clair some responsibility: G53 i 523 = 1476, malHoadod 'Households (c-1 - c-4) The only method which was round capable of producing internally ccnsistent fig res for female-headed households req'.:ired the use of 7 U r un-published census Material for ?'ias!1i_ngton Coi)_rity.. l e respective ratios 0f elderly, large family, and family renters (anO ok,mers) lit-ir. - �'rde^ i� adaQLat� 1,_)USing COlditl0r�g tae-r ?pplied t0 the Ti - ^ �OtalB for renters and O�v:'ierS needing cSSiStance. Then t1--se�fi Eares were maltinli ed by 'he 10/70 ratio of T�gard 1arri l i es Z,'i tl: regale heads to total families. For example "'tee c`' -'Ayanle elderly renters ?°Tashi ig u n Coun ty . Page A10 of 16 pages - Aoo�� t [a�� ;�w�.J 1" �•�L�e a pl e x� � tl�l c. •• '.. �u ��H-ii'� I �of L)li TA I7,}?P, P]:,AI\T (Z C D C) I?OUNDARTT'` CITY of TIOARD r•?L'NICIPAL BOUNDARIES �i iw `` r-'• T/GARD & V/C/N/T Y ........ ri a .6 14 �_ (- I! eoAo iNoez � ,r�� u �• Leyaty0 f!1-—•'�1 "'Qa .,I i -A i. ., eo.e /IrYK♦~® WeMO•-• M ! M \�\ I�J�]!� -L^� `. .,. „• .• .,y '',i•�. Ms+rvN.N.wN+(,.N s�os N.ensu. / ¢� ` ® ! ! ,L\ i.. I I—:I i I .... ,,. ., � � �, �� y• ..t�' / ` �� •LL Ali} it to it 1 63 elcerly in need (21. 5) times Tigard total renters in nee4 N5�0). times Tigard 197^ ratio of female-headed families .0938) . Summing elde_-ly, family and large family produl-ed the totals- for female-:Iaaded households. na`e A22 cr 16 "'able II, p. 2 Spanish-American 'ousehold.s in Need of Assistance Spanish-Americans were the only- minority group for which we were able to obtain: sufficient information to fill out Table II (see below for methodology used to determine total minorities in need) . The 1970 .cerisus provided data on Spanish-Americans only by census tract, so use did not determine the nuTber living in the City ,using this source. Instead, i•:e obtained a mailing list from Aguila, a Spanish-American social service organization. The list i,.as compiled beginning in 1971. According to this source, there are 26 Spanish-American households in the City of Tigard. To determine the number of households in need, the ratio of all households in reed in 1076 (Table II, F. 1, Ab-1 plus Bb-1) to total households ('Table I, lb) was multiplied times the rat;o of 1c70 S M S A. total family median income to 1970 S lei S A. Spanish- A_merican family .media.n income: 953 X 8378 _ . 305. The result- 3291 77675) ir_g figure was multiplied times the total of Spanish-American house- holds in Tigard: . 305 X 26 = 8. Total' Oi•,,ner Households (Ae-1) . The ratio of total owner house- holds in need (Table Ii, p. l Ab-1) to total owner and renter households in deed was multiplied times the number of Spanish-Americar. households in need. . Elderly Owners (Ae-2) . The ratio of total owner elderly in need (Table II, p. l At=2) to total owner in need was applied to the total Spanish-American o.tiners in need. Family and Large Family Owners (Ae-4 and Ae-5) .. The total family owner percentage from Table' II, p.l was applied to the total Spanish-American owners in need . Since house- hold size for Portland Spanish-Americans is fully one person larger(3. 8 vs. 2. 8�.than for the total population, the large Family category was assumed to contain one person more than these calculations indicated. Row B, :tenter Households. Figures were calculated using the similar procedures as above, with total renter used. in place of total owners. Table -11, p. l All Minorities Other Minorities. In 1970, there were 36 other minority -ersons living in Tiard ( 7 Black, 19 Oriental, and 10 Indian) . To produce an estimate of the total other minority households in need , this figure was multi plied by: ratio of 1976 to 1970 total Tigard population, the inverse of 1970 average household size, and the ratio of total Tigard househcics in reed in 1976 to total households . Using this method , 7 other minority hovsehol^.s were in need in 1976 .. Total ot•er m;r.ori tJ, owners, renters, elderly. o%-,7:ers, family ot•.7:ers, large family owners, elderly renters, family renters, and large family renters were all calculated using the total ratios Pale A 33 of lE Pages • SF:IAN1SH - RMSR1CFINS wA �.,. WITHIN C-17Y UMITS TGARD.OREGO FRO ffi '4'�F•i�-F tea• •/= • ' ;�"''-'. ^_/, =6.• .. .�£•- ..--- rif L_i.. II .<.. . r ,• Sr..=�_ �� _ �! Vii( � ti ev � •1:� 1. — '.w V�;i. ;I Il Irom Table II, p.-1 Ab-1 through Ar-4 and Bb-1 'through ,-Bb-4. All minorities (Adel.. - Ad-4 , Bd-1 - Bd-4) . These figures were produced b;- summation of 1znanish-American aid other minorities. J Page A. 15 of 16 Pages ATTACtu''Wi?T TO TrPTF III This goal represents a' first phase effort to begin a housing assistance p7ogram where none previously existed. It is based on a realistic assessment of the City' s responsibilities and resources, and -more specifically, the !sousing assistance needs of the area over which the City has legal jurisdiction at. this time (see mote * under: Attachment to Table II, (D) Additional. Families Erected to reside) . The area be;Tor_d the City is the Cou_lty' s responsibility, although ever the next several years the balance of responsibility is erected to shift as anne`.rations occur. Appropriate adjustments in the City' s housing assistance program will occur at that time. Page A 16 of 16 Pages CITY ®F TIGA D P. O. Box 23557 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 September 30, 1975 Floyd B. Arms, Director Co=unity Planning and Development U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Cascade Building 520 S.I.J. 5th. Avenue Portland, Ore on 97204 Dear I•Zr. Arms: The revised Sousing Assistance Plan, to be considered as part of the Housing and Community Development discretionary block grant application submitted earlier, is enclosed for your final review and approval. The Housing Assistance Plan tables are new tables based on data sources and methodologies not available when the tables for the original application were constructed. +',e wish these new tables to be considered as the official tables for the amended application. Please contact us if we can be of service in your review process. Sincerely, F� Loris Liartig City Admin-is" Pro Tem -, /nr . S. Also enclosed are the State A-O5 review conclusions ,,yhich were r_ct made available tc this office at the time of our i` sinal application submittal (Aus,ust 15, 1976) . - s. E 01 0�,J i" J bE C T STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Intergovernmental Relations Division 240 Cottage Street S.D. , Salem, Oregon 47310 Leslie Lehmann, Coordinator Ph: 378-3732 R' STATE A-95 REVIEW CONCLUSIONS APPLICANT : City of Tigard CITY OF TIGARD PROJECT TITLE : Community Development DATE : 9/13/76 The state has reviewed your project and reached the following conclusions : aNo significant conflict with the plans, policies or programs of state government have been identified Relevant. comments of stLte agencies are attached Fx1 and should be considered in the final design of your proposal . Potential conflict- with the plans and programs of the state agency (s) have been satisfactorily resolved. No significant issues remain . ❑ Si(.Inificant conflicts with the plans, policies or programs of state government have been identified and remain unresolved. The fin*al proposal has been reviewed and the final comments and recommendations of the state are attached. NOTICE TO FEDERAL AGENCY The following is the officially assigned State Identifier Number: 7607 a 550 This number should be used on all correspondence and particularly on SF 240 as required by OMB A-98. A copy of His notification and attachments , if any , must accompany Your applical.ion to the federal agency as required by OMB A-95 . Comments of the appropriate local reviewing agencies must- also be included. i rjj,,-s A'2 °a G.EPARTM. i OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVEL• RENT PORTLAND AREA OFFICE CASCADE BUILDING, 520 S,W. SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 °�•�>ro{!lliiiNl August 20; 1976. REG[ON:X Arcade Plaza Building 1321 Second Avenue _ - - Seattle,Washington 98101 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1:0.2D (Greeno) 221-2601 Mr. Bruce .P. Clark City Administrator, City of Tigard 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Subject- Community Development Block Brant Funds - Metropoliten City of Tigard, Or. , Application No. B-76-DS-41-0010 We are pleased to advise you that the above identified application was received 8/16/76 and is acceptable for processing. however, we caution that this does not indicate approval of the application. My congratulations to you and your staff for submitting what appears to be an excellent proposal . Sincerely, *FloyvdB. rms Director Community Planning & Development CITY OF T°IGAR P. O. Box 23557 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 August 18, 1976 Mr. Ralph Greeno Area Representative Community Planning and Development Department of Housing and Urban Development Cascade Building 520 S.W. 6th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Dear Mr. Greeno: As p'er your recommendation, enclosed you will find the necessary revisions, as they pertain to Tigard's HCD application. If additional information or revisions are needed, please contact this office at 639-4171, and we will immediately respond to those requirements. Sincerely, ohn Laws Assistant Planner JL/pr Enclosures 2 _ n CITY OF . TIGARD, P,'O: Box 23557 12420 S. W. Main TJgwd. Oregon 97223 August ?7, 1976 I,'r. Floyd Arras Director Coririmmity Plar-ring and Development De-partment of mousing and Urian Develonrent Cascade Building 620 S, 6th Avenue Portland, Oreton 97204 Dear 'Kr. Ar -s t As per rroz;.r request, enclosed is the State Cleari-nghouso Project acl-o•.t=ledE e^ent for review of the C itv of ^if-ard's application to the Depas c`'nen. of Hotlsi ng and Urban for a Housing and Conunvani--y Developinen t block crar_t. Sincerely, Bruce Clark City Administrator DC/pr Tnclo sure Form Approved . OMB No. 63—R1471 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 1. STATE CLEARINGHOUba IDENTIFIER URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. APPLICANT'S APPLICATION NO. 3. FEDERAL GRANTOR AGENCY 4. APPLICANT NAME Department of Housing and Urban Development CITY OF TIGARD AREA OR REGIONAL OFFICE STREET ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 12420 S.W. Main Street . STREET ADDRESS - P.O. BOX CITY COUNTY Tigard Washington CITY STATE ZIP CODE STATE ZIP CODE Oregon 97223 5. DESCRIPTIVE NAME OF THE PROJECT Community Development Block Grant Program 6. FEDERAL CATALOG No. 7. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUESTED 14 . 219 Metropolitan Area Balance $ 131,464 . 06 , S. GRANTEE TYPE f: ❑ STATE, ❑ COUNTY, rJ CITY, ❑ OTHER (Specify) r 9. TYPE OF APPLICATION REQUEST [� NEW GRANT, ❑ CONTINUATION, ❑ SUPPLEMENT, ❑ OTHER CHANGES (Specify) 10. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE t GRANT, ❑ LOAN, ❑ OTHER (Specify) r i 11. POPULATION DIRECTLY BENEFITING FROM THE PROJECT 13. LENGTH OF PROJECT -5, 000 3 - 6 months 12. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 14. BEGINNING DATE a 1st congressional . As soon as monies become available b. 15. DATE OF APPLICATION 1st congressional August 15, 1976 t 16. THE APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE DATA IN THIS APPLICATION 1 ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, AND THAT HE WILL COMPLY �VITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF HE RECEIVES THE GRANT. TYPED NAME TITLE Bruce Clark _ City Administrator TELEPHONE NUMBER t, SIGNATOR OF AUI-HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Area Number Ext. Code 503 639-4171 ' FOR FEDERAL USE ONLY tr E Page 1 of 26 Pages EDITION OF 10-74 IS OBSOLETE HUD-701S (11-75) 4 • U.S. C ITMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1 ASSURANCES The applicant hereby assures and certifies with respect to the grant that: (1) It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant,and to execute the proposed program. (2) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a resolution, motion or similar action authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and designating the authorized representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required. (3) It has compiled with all the requirements of OMB Circular No. A-95 as modified by Sections 570.300(c) (for entitlement applicants)or 570.400(d)(for discretionary applicants)and that either (i) any comments and recommendations made by or through clearinghouses are attached and have been considered prior to submission of the application;or (ii) the required procedures have been followed and no comments or recommendations have been received. (4) Prior to submission of its application,the applicant has: (i) provided citizens with adequate information concerning the amount of funds available for proposed community development and housing activities,the range of activities that may be undertaken,and other important program requirements; (ii) held at least two public hearings to obtain the views of citizens on community development and housing needs; and (iii) provided citizens an adequate opportunity to articulate needs, express preferences about proposed activities, ! assist in the selection of priorities,and otherwise to participate in the development of the application. (5) Its chief executive officer or other officer of applicant approved by HUD: (i) Consents to assume the status of a responsible Federal official under the National Environrnental Policy Act of 1969 insofar as the provisions of such Act apply to the applicant's proposed program pursuant to 24 CFR 570.603; and (ii) Is authorized and consents on behalf of the applicant and himself to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts for the purpose of enforcement of his responsibilities as such an official. (6) The Community Development Program has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low or moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight.Where all or part of the community development program activities are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency, such needs are specifically described in the application under the Community Development Plan Summary. (7) It will comply with the regulations, policies,guidelines and requirements of Federal Management Circulars 74A and 74-7,as they relate to the application,acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted program. t (8) It will administer and enforce the labor standards requirements set forth in Section 570.605 and HUD regulations issued to implement such requirements. (9) It will comply with all requirements imposed by HUD concerning special requirements of law,program requirements, and other administrative requirements approved in accordance with Federal Management Circular 74-7. (10) It will comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11296,relating to evaluation of flood hazards. t (11) It will comply with: (i) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352)and the regulations issued pursuant thereto(24 CFR Part 1),which provides that no person in the United States shall on the ground of race,color,or national origin,be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of,or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this assurarrce. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the applicant,this assurance shall obligate the applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property,any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. (ii) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-284) as amended, administering all programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing;and will take action to affirmatively further fair housing in the sale or rental of housing, the financing of housing, and the provision of brokerage services within the applicant's jurisdiction. Page 2 of 26 Pages HUD-7015.12(11-75) COMM6NITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (STATEMENT OF NEEDS) .. . . 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2.APPLICATION NUMBER 3. ® ORIGINAL AMENDMENT CITY OF TIGARD s. PROGRAM YEAR (Entitlement Applicants Only) FROM: TO: A- 1 There is a definite need and community support for providing pedestrian safety-oriented system of bikeways and walkways throughout the City. It is the community's concensus based on public hearings, surveys, Comprehensive Pedestrian Bicycle Path- way Plan* and Traffic Safety Study, that construction of bicycle and pedestrian walkways would do the most good for the greatest number of people as far as improving safety conditions along the City ' s roadways. There have been serious accidents and even fatalities which has caused the community to be even more keenly aware of the existing danger to pedestrian safety and the desire to see this problem corrected. Data Source: * Comprehensive Pedestrian-Bicycle Pathway Plan I A- i fi 2 Tigard is listed by H.U.D. as being within a flood hazard area. Rapid development , especially of industrial land along Fanno Creek, the major stream, creates an urgent need for an area- wide drainage plan . Presently, major developments are taking place with no ability to evaluate .the impacts upon the City ' s4 drainage system. Annual flooding is occurring on the major streams and in addition 60 separate locations on streets and in subdivisions have been documented by the City Engineer as representing serious drainage problems . r h Data Source: Storm Drainage Problem Inventory 11 A- t 3 Tigard is in a state of transition from a rural community to i a suburban/urban environment . While much private development has occurred, the system of public roads and streets has t remained essentially a rural road system, consisting of 18 to 26 feet of pavement , open storm drainage and no sidewalks or streetlights. The result is increased traffic and pedestrian hazards, a concern often expressed by residents . Data St-mice: Tigard Traffic Safety Study Page 3 of 26 Pages Page 3 of 26 Pages HUD-7015.2 (11-75) A-4 Tigard is a rapidly growing community; (loo per year for ' the past five years to rank as the - second fastest. growing City in the state) available land must be re_ser'ved ;for open space and recrea- tion use while the opportunity e.xists'. The City comprehensive plan delineatds the basic need: for park sites with general locational ' needs. The City is working toward, implementing this plan but avail- able finances provide the major constraint. :. 'In addition, it is apparent that certain groups, such 'as 'the elderly, have special recreation needs which have not been assessed. Data Source: Tigard Community Plan A-5 The average cost of housing, within Tigard, does not provide people of low and moderate means the opportunity to obtain housing. Tibard, like many areas on the periphery of a large metropolitan city is undergoing a transition from a rural oriented environment to one of rapid suburban growth. As a result of this rapid . i,ncrease in the population, various development patterns have taken place. Particularly, with the advent of the shopping complex ( in this case Washington Square) hundreds of new jobs have been created, resulting in a need to house those workers employed by the businesses within the centers and the additional businesses that - have been started as a direct spin-off of the nucleus . Many of those workers employed by these enterprises as well as businesses already established within the community receive salaries which . place them in a low and moderate income category. The Housing Authority of Washington County has recorded ` numerous requests by people who have expressed. their desire to live in Tigard if housing were available to meet their incomes . Presently, within the City of Tigard, there are 19 units that are. being subsidized through rent ,supplement payments under the jurisdiction of the Housing Authority of Washington County, and an additional 24 have applied. Data Source: Housing Authority of Washington County, U. S . Bureau of .Census ,for 1970. Page 4 of 26 Pages A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMM.,..Y (L ONG-TERM OBJECTIVES) 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. ' �] ORINGINAL ❑ AMENDMENT CITY OF TIGARD 4. PROGRAM YEAR /Entitlement Applicants Only) FROM: TO: B- 1 The essential objective is to provide a safe and desirable pedestrian/bikeway system for youth, elderly and those seeking an alternative to automobile use. The secondary objective is to develop a system that will (a) tie together recreation areas, schools, and their service areas ; (b) provide protective buffers between incompatible land uses; (c) reduce flood hazard by re- stricting development along natural drainage ways; (d) provide opportunities for passive & active recreation activities; (e) preserve the amenity of the city. Supports Need(s) No: A-1 1 2 A comprehensive and basin wide drainage plan and flood control program to be conducted jointly with Washington County. This plan would provide the basis for all storm sewer projects, public H and private, guide the development of land to minimize adverse impacts upon the drainage system, and recommend projects alleviating the flood hazard. A secondary benefit would be retention of the natural amenities associated with the natural drainage system, preserving useable open space. The City ' s Comprehensive Plan strongly recommends preservation of this "Greenway" system. Supports Need(s) No: A-2 8- i Y 3 Work with Washington County and the State of Oregon to improve the City ' s arterial and collector street system. A particular objective is to jointly propose legislation at the state level to overcome certain legal and jurisdictional restraints which frustrate joint action on road improvements. A-3 Supports Need(s) No: HUD-7015.3(11-75)- Page 5 of 26 Pages A B-4 Develop a comprehensive recreation program, to include both activities and facilities. This program would be the result of a needs analysis study assessing: 1 . Recreation requirements of the various segments of the population, (existing and projected) . 2. Review and evaluate .,existing programs. 3. Compare present and projected needs with existing programs and .facilities to determine deficiencies. Supports Need No : A-4 B-5 To provide factual data that will delineate a more precise understanding of housing needs within the community, an extensive survey of the existing housing stock would be undertaken . Particular emphasis would be directed toward determining the housing needs of the elderly and handicapped, minorities, and female-headed house- holds. Programs designed to achieve the greatest cost savings to the community such as land acquisition , subsidized sewer hook-ups and low interest rates arranged through private financial institutions will be considered, analyzed and applied where ever they might provide the most optimum benefit to the community. The hiring of an additional staff member, working part time at a salary of $4, 250, will be required to research and document the information to be included within the comprehensive housing stock survey , plus related staff supported services at a cost of $800. Supports Need No. A-5 - Page 6 of 26 Pages CONE ITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY • (SHORT-TERM OBJECTIVES) 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. ORIGINAL O AMENDMENT CITY OF TIGARD 4. PROGRAM YEAR (EntltlementAPPlkena On/y) FROM: TO: C- 1 The construction of a primary pedestrian-bikepath system meeting the most pressing existant needs while offering the nucleus for an expanded system. This expanded system to cover larger geographic area and to also fill the interstices within the proposed primary system. Supporu Noad(s) No: A-1 C- 2 Within the first year, accomplish basin wide drainage study, working jointly with Washington County and using an engineering consultant . The following two years to consist of implementa- tion of the drainage plan through construction of flood control facilities and by using the plan as tool for reviewing private development proposals. Supports N"d(s) No: A-2 C- E I � I 3 Within the first year, draft model legislation for State consideration, enabling the City to finance road improvement projects which are under both city and county jurisdiction . In addition, using the existing priority listing of ro-?.d improvement needs, complete engineering of the top ten -rated priorities . The following two years to be utilized iw.ple- menting the top priority projects. A-3 S"pp°r°Nood(s) Page 7 of 26 Pag s Pogo—`t— of":.,.^opraa HUD-7015.4 (11-75) C-4 Within the first year, complete the comprehensive recreation program outlined under B-4 . The remaining two years to be spent in meeting the most urgent recreation needs as determined by the needs analysis conducted during the initial year. Only after completion of the comprehensive recreation program will it be possible to isolate specific needs for programs and/or facilities . Supports Need No . A-4 C-5 Detailed housing needs are to be established in the comprehensive housing stock survey and applications for housing from the Washington County Housing Authority. Location of housing to be constructed shall be in those areas as described in Housing Assistance Plan Table IV, General Location of Low-Income Housing. Supports Need No. A-5 I I i s i t F - Page 8 of 26 Pages t f =L IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMA (OTHER NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY) CX 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. ORIGINAL E] AMENDMENT CITY OF TIGARD 4. PROGRAM YEAR (Entitlement Applicants Only) FROM: TO: A- The community has no identified housing needs that warrant immediate attention at this- time. r f R F� f 1; i' r f ( 41t ta. i 1. p i f!f 1 Ii t I 3 i Data Source: ' I HUD-7015.2A (11-75) Pape 9 of 26 Papas _ r A. L� ORIGINAL B. APPLICATION NO. U,S, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET ❑ AMENDMEN C. NAME OF APPLICANT D. PROGRAM YEAR CITY OF TIGARD FROM: TO LINE E. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT FOR HUD NO. USE ONLY 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 10, 200 2. PUBLIC WORKS,FACILITIES,SITE IMPROVEMENTS 116 , 214 . 013 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE,DEMOLITION,REHABILITATION - 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 6, SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENTS FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME a 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY P 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES t` 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL/NDP PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT 14. ADMINISTRATION 5, 050 15. CONTINUATION OF MODEL CITIES ACTIVITIES 16. SUBTOTAL(Sum of Lines 1 thru 15) 131 ,464 . 06 _ a CONTINGENCIES AND/OR UNSPECIFIED LOCAL OPTION ACTIVITIES 17. f` (Not to exceed 10%of line 16) r 18. TOTAL PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS(Sum of Lines 16and 17) 131 ,464 . 06 LINE NO. F. RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS k � 1. ENTITLEMENT OR DISCRETIONARY.AMOUNTv` xy� i�k3� 131 ,464 . 0 2. LESS DEDUCTIONS steak £� �, g r s�" } k ENTITLEMENT/DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES E. 3. (Line 1 minus2) 131 ,464 . 061 4. PROGRAM INCOME 5. SURPLUS FROM URBAN RENEWAL/NDP SETTLEMENT fi 8. LOAN PROCEEDS 7. REPROGRAMMED UNOBLIGATED FUNDS FROM PRIOR PROGRAM YEAR 8. TOTAL :FSOUFICES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS(Sum ofLines3-7) 131 , 464 . 06 EIO:Che,'� uu 11 costs include lncUrect costs which require approval o1 a cost allocation plan as required by Federal Management Circular 74.4. € EDITION OF 10.7415 OBSOLETE HUD-7015.5(11-75) Page 10 of 26 Pages 1.NAME OF APPLICANT 2.APPLICATION NO. 3.10 OR IG I NAL I ❑AMENDMENT DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENT APPLICANTS ONLY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 4.PROGRAM YEAR: CITY OF TIGARD FROM: TO: CENSUS ESTIMATED COST ($000) RELATED RELATED SHORT- TRACT( ENVIRONMENTAL BUDGET BLOCK GRANT FUNDS OTHER FUNDS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ENUMER- REVIEW I TERM ATION STATUS LINE PROGRAM SUBSEQUENT OBJECTIVE DISTRICT ITEM YEAR YEAR TOTAL AMOUNT SOURCE �» (2) (3) rat (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - 1st Yea 1 . S.W.. Greenburg. - Pacific Hwy to C-1 309 assessment $ 8,948.9 Tiedeman 2. S.W. Tigard - Main to Tiedeman C-1 319 7,265.1 i 3. Land Acquistion for Easements/ C-1 319 0,200.0 Right of Way 4. Housing Stock SurveyC=5 All of 5,050.0 _ city Subsequent Program Year 1 . S.W. McDonald - Pacific Hwy. to Hall Blvd. 97th to Twality . Jr. High School C-1 308 $ 20,665. 5 • . 2. S.W. Walnut - 121st to 128th C-1 319 36,211 . 5, 3. S.W. Gaarde - Pacific Hwy to Rose C-1 319 51 ,189. 4 4. S.W. Tiedeman - Greenburg Rd. to 66,257.49 Walnut C-1 319 " 5. S.W. Fonner St. - Tiedeman to 44,657.2.9 sidewalk on 115th C-1 319 b 6. S.W. Burnham - Hall Blvd to 30,136.1'8 ' Main C-1 308 " m ~I 0� �lV O) GRAND TOTAL 1131 ,46406J49�b18 J80, 2 $ Vq (D HUD 7015.1 (11-75) CD N PROJECT AND ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION - FIRST YEAR Pedestrian/Bike Path 1) Greenburg - Pacific Highway to Tiedeman Length of Project: 3900' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 99.30 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $11,700.00 c. Storm Sewer (1011) $46,800.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 49.65 e. Crossings/Signs $ 300.00 $ 589948.95 2) Tigard - 1,1ain to Tiedeman Length of Project: 3800' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 96.74 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) ;,11,400.00 c. Storm Seiver $45,600.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 48.37 e. Crossings/Signs $ 120.00 $ 57,265.11 Totals: a Grading/Cleaning -& Grubing $ 196.04 bRock and Class C Mix (asphalt) 11;239100.00 c Storm Sewer 4;92,400.00 d Fill (soil) $ 98.02 e Crossings/Suns $ 420.00 $116,214.06 Page 12 of 26 Pages PROJECT AND ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION - SUBSEQUENT PROGRAM YEAR 1) McDonald - Pacific Hwy. to Hall Blvd. to 97th to School Length of Project: 8000' Project Costs.- a. osts:a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 203.70 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $24,000.00. c. Storm Server $969000.00 d. Fill (soil) $ - 101.85 e. Crossings/Signs $ 360.00 $120,665.55 2) Walnut - 121st to 128th Length of Project: 2400' Project Costs : a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 6.1.10 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $ 71200.00 c. Storm Sewer $281800.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 30.55 e. Crossings/Signs $ 120.00 $ 369211.65 3) Gaarde - Pacific Highway to Rose Vista Length of Project: 34001 Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 86.56 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) ? 10,200.00 c. Storm Sewer $40,800.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 43.28 e. Crossings/Signs $ 60.00 $519189.84 4) Tiedeman - Greenburg to 1.'alnut Length of Project: 3600' Project Costs : a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 91.66 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $10,800.00 c. Storm Server $559200.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 45.83 e. Crossings/Signs $ 120.00 $ 66,257.49 Page 13 of 26 Pages k V •• 5) Fonner - Tiedeman to walk on 115th Length of Project: 3600' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 91.66 b. Rock and Class C Drax (asphalt) $10,800.00 c. Storm Sewer $33,600.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 45.83 e. Crossings/Signs $__120.00 $ 44,657.49 6) Burnham - Hall Blvd. to Main i - I Length of Project: 2000' j Project Costs: a. Grading/iivat,ing & Grubing $ 50.92 b. Rock and Class C Prix (asphalt) $ 69000.00 c. Storm Seiner S24,005.00 46 d. Fill (soil) • e. Crossings/Signs $ 60.00 $ 309136.38 Totals: a Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 585.60 b Rock and Class C Tri_x (asphalt) $69,000.00 c Storm Sewer "278,400.00 d Fill (soil) $ 292.80 e Crossings/Signs $_ 840.00 ;3490118.40 -2- Page 14 of 26 Pages BIKIE - PE ® ESTR NN PATHS� - � ....... Existing � .� - �. . I-IC ® Proposal -s..t _ % • NpC �_- o '� �- Pro rams Subsequent 1 Programmed (State FED [51 �_- .: AEC- nz oil ra — �; •r,--.fu: �� .iY' aa-µ' z.�z�:mucr --- sine• �I� ! UU��nnjj r i �F r ni. Oil Page 15 of 26 Pages Form Approved OMB No. 63R-1471 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT , HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN — TABLE I. SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS A. HOUSING STATUS AND CONDITION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS Its THE COMMUNITY 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 3. [X� ORIGINAL AMENDMENT, DATE: CITY OF TIGARD 4. PROGRAM YEAR S. DATE OF HOUSING SURVEYISI USED FROM: TO: 1970, 1976 NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS YEAR ALL UNITS OWNER RENTER STATUS AND CONDITION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS OF SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL ESTIMATE SUITABLE SUITABLE SUITABLE TOTAL FOR TOTAL FOR TOTAL FOR REHABILITATION* REHABILITATION* REHABILITATION* (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) ( ) I I. Occupied led Units — Total 970 • 1787 798 1470 NA 989 1821 NA 1976 3291_ NA _ 2 a. Substandard 97031 31. 5 5 26 26 NA 3 197G _____ 189 118 NA NA NA 970 1730 793 NA 963 NA NA b. Standard and All Other (line I minus line !a) 3102 NA 4 1. Vacant Available Units — Total 970 287 NA 36 251 d 1976 54 3b 15d NA 40 NA 5 a. Substandard 1976 11b 3b NA NA NA NA 6 b. Standard and All Other (line 2 minus line 2a) 1976 43b NA N.A. NA NA NA 0 7 3. Housing Stock Available — Total (sum of lines I and 2) 9701976` 2074 3345 NA 0. 576 1345 NA 2000 NA ai 4. Vacancy Rate (line 2+ 3) F9701976 13 . 8% 1 . 6%9- NA 1 . 1%c NA 2. 0%c NA *Units "Suitable for Rehabilitation" must be included as a subtotal if the applicant is proposing a rehabilitation program on Table III, Goals for Lower Income Housing Assistance. O7 B. DEFINITIONS, DATA SOURCES, AND METHODS (Attach additional pages) See attachment to Table I 1. Definition of "substandard" used. b 2. Definition of "suitable for rehabilitation's used. a 3. Data sources and methods used. (D in HUD-7015.8 (12-75) ATTACHMENT TO TABLE I All 1970 data is from the Fourth Count Census. a., 1976 - Oregon Housing Division, housing stock data (1969 plus building permit data through 1975) . b. 1976 - Building Department Survey �.. 1976 - HUD single family vacancy rate and multiple family vacancy rate, from Oregon Housing Division. .d. 1976 - Vacant units based on HUD vacany rates (see foot- note c) . Definition of "substandard" : Substandard units were determined by the lack of or deficiencies in plumbing and heating facilities, wiring, gutters, roof condition, etc. based on a survey conducted by the Tigard Building Department . A more complete and accurate accounting of substandard housing units will be realized by the proposed housing stock survey. Page 17 of 26 Pages Form Approved OMB No, 63R-1471 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN — TABLE II. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 9. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ® ORIGINAL B I — I I — I — — IT] Ej AMENDMENT, DATE: CITY OF TIGARD 4. PROGRAM YEAR S. DATE OF HOUSING SURVEYS) USED FROM: TO: NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ALL HOUSEHOLDS ALL FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS ALL MINORITY HOUSEHOLDS STATUS OF HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING ASSISTANCE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMILY TOTAL HANDICAPPED (.l or less TOTAL HANDICAPPED (4 or less FAMILY FAMILY (5 or more TOTAL HANDICAPPED (•F or less (5 or more (1-2 persons) persons) persons) (1-2 persons) persons) (pees ns) (1.2 persons) persons) persons) (a) (b•1) (b•2) (b•3) (6-4) (c•1) (c•2) (c-3) (c-4) (d-1) (d-2) (d-3) (d-4) A. OWNER HOUSEHOLDS 1 (Excluding displacees) 405 186 195 ._76 118 52 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 2 B. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS (Excluding dis lacecs 679 39 414 48 197 35 N.A . N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.. N.A. C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED 3 IN PROGRAM YEAR (Sum of lines C1 and C2) None — — — — — — — — — — — 4 : 1. Owners None — — — — — — — — — — — s 2• Renters None — — — — — — — — — — — e D. ADDITIONAL FAMILIES EXPECTED TO RESIDE IN COMMUNITY (Sum of lines Dl and D2) 873 0 162 33 84 0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.-—� N.A. N.A. 7 1. As a result of planned employment 468 0 87 18 45 0 N.A. N.A. N. A. N.A. N.A. N.A. e 1 2. Already employed in localit5 15 39 0 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.v E. TOTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS 9 (Sum of lines A, B, C, and D) 1957 225 771 157 399 87 N.A. N.A. N.A. * N.A. N.A. N.A. 10 Percent of Total ° ' 100% /°11 . 5'° 39 .4 8 .0 20 .4 0 4 . 4% N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. F. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS (Attach additional pages) See attachment to Table II *See Notes to p. 2 of Table II Hltt)-7015.9(1Z-751 Paye 2 at 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT JF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT r ' HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN — TABLE II. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS I• NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION GRANT NUMBER 3. ORIGINAL AMENDMENT. DATE: B — CITY OF TIGARD — — 4. PROGRAM YEAR F OM: PROVIDE DATE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF MINORITY HOUSEHOLD, AS APPROPRIATE (Check appropriate box) (Check appropriate box) (Check appropriate box) I• L,j BLACK/NEGRO 4. V ORIENTAL I. j�; BLACK/NEGRO 4. Q ORIENTAL I. u BLACK/NEGRO 4. ORIENTAL STATUS OF 2. SPANISH-AMERICAN 5. ALL OTHER 2. SPANISH-AMERICAN 5. a ALL OTHER 2. SPANISH-AMERICAN S. Q ALL OTHER HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING MINORITIES MINORITIES MINORITIES 3. U AMERICAN INDIAN 3.= AMERICAN INDIAN 3. AMERICAN INDIAN ASSISTANCE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE FAMILY FAMILY FAMILY TOTAL HANDICAPPED (.j or less (S or more TOTAL HANDICAPPED (1 or less (S or more TOTAL HANDICAPPED (.j or less ($ or more (1-2 persons) persons) persons) (1-2 person.) persons) persons) (1-2 persons) persons) persons) (a) (e-1) (e-2) (e-4) (e-Sy (f-1) (f-2) (f•3) (f-4) (y-1) (e-2) (y-3) (9.4) I A. OWNER HOUSEHOLDS (excluding dis lacees)- Total N.A. * N. A. N.A. N.A. N N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N N.A. 2 B. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS - (exrlwling dis lacees -Total N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 3 C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED IN PROGRAM YEAR(Sum of lines 1 and 2) None - 4 Owners None - 5 Renters None — — D. TOTAL(sum of lines .4,11, and Q N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. *Not Available, to be obtained in the proposed housing stock survey. Not even total minority data is available for the city, although we do have that figure for Black/Negro (2 residents in 1970) . The census tracts (307, 308, 309, 319) , which include area not in the city, showed 161 Spanish-America residents in 1970 (see Map of Minorities) . a a HUD-7015.9 (12-75) TABLE II - DATA SOURCES AND METHODOLOGY A. Owner Households Total Households (b-1) Using 1970 .Fourth Count Census Data and HUD' s 807o median income thresholds for housing assistance (by size of household) , the total number of owner house- holds eligible for assistance in' 1970 was obtained by summing, interpolating between income ranges where necessary. This figure was then divided by the total number of owner households in 1970 to obtain a ratio. This ratio was then applied to the 1976 total number of owner households (Table I , cell 1(d) ) to obtain the total number of owner house- holds in need in 1976. Elderly (b-2) Using the same data sources as in b-1 above, the 1970 proportion of primary individual owners who were elderly was obtained, and this ratio was applied, to the income ranges below 80`�o median income for primary individuals to calculate the number of elderly primary individual owners in need in 1970. The number of elderly husband-wife owners in need in 1970 was obtained from the income range figures. The 1970 sum of elderly owners in need who were husband- wife or primary individuals was then divided by the total number of 1970 owner households, and then applied to the 1976 figure for total number of owner households . Family (b-3) Using the same data sources as above, and the Oregon Housing Division definition of family (two or more persons) , the total number of 2, 3, and 4 person familiies in need in 1970 was obtained. The proportion of family owners in need in 1970 was then applied to the 1976 figure for total owner households. Large Family (b-4) The same method was followed as for Family (b-3) except the tables used were for families of 5 or more. Total Female-Headed Households (C-1) Female-headed household owners in need in 1970 was calculated, and the resulting proportion of total owners was applied to 1976 . But first, the 1970 female primary individual owners in need and female "Other Family" owners in need were calculated separately. In the case of female-headed households, for instance, this proportion of total owner "Other Family" was computed and then applied to the income ranges in need (the threshold for a 2-person household - $6562 - was used) . Elti(2r•ly Female-headed .Households (C-2) There were no elderly female-headed households in 1970. The proportion of primary individual owners in 1970 who were elderly female primary individual owners was calculated and applied to Page 20 of 26 Pages the income range figures for primary individual owners. The resulting number of elderly female owners in need in 1970 was applied to the 1970 total of owner households to obtain a ratio, and this ratio was applied to the 1976 total of owner households. B. Renter Households The same procedures were used to compute renters households in need, with the renter-tabulated data. C. None D. Additional Families Expected to Reside in Community 1 . Planned Employment A telephone survey of employers in the Tigard planning area yielded an estimate of total employment increase expected in the next three ( 3) years. Assuming that the same proportion of these employees would settle in Tigard and be in need of housing assistance as is true for Tigard area workers today, the current ratio of households in need of housing to total households was calculated. Total owner and renter households in need (rows A and . B, column (b-1) ) minus elderly owner and renter households in need was divided by the number of occupied units in 1976 (Table I , 1 (b) ) . This ratio was then applied to the total ex- pected employment increase. Family and large family figures were calculated on their current respective proportion of total occupied units . 2. Already Employed but Living Elsewhere Total current employment in the Tigard planning area was estimated on the basis of a 1974-75 traffic circulation study for Neighborhood Planning Organizations. Gross floor area data was converted to employment using standard averages for employees per thousand square feet . The number who could live in the city if housing assistance were available was then computed using the current proportion of house- holds needing assistance. However, since not all such households would choose to live in the city even if the housing assistance were available, this figure was ad- justed by an estimate of workers in a community who could be expected to reside there (17%) . This estimate is based on a survey conducted by the City of Tigard in conjunction with Carl Buttke, P.E., in 1975 to determine the travel characteristics of employees within the industrial and general office base of the Tigard area. Page 21 of 26 Pages- At ��.••• • - -. - - ,C ... _ .;v•.. i7: J•:.377 F- - ' il. � __• .0}' �r C 4 N C E IV T R A T I.V N-S - O� _ M I N_.._� �t�Tiz- I_ 1�:1� 35 i �° 7■ e 3 Chicano S.. - - - 71.1• :' n. ��17��•. :79 _�K�1 A ^.Y. -LIT St •107 .. -t Tr a cl 307 1681 ;2H 4 163; -^jl' • 1[?rS .CC, 217 v.cc0 308 (4 51 �! ,. __ 111 ='• ''• -- 107 7±.'t+.o. 707 -M'. _-�q�dss If _ - r..a.. = it �igard Divi / CEY 106 :07 « } ,�•� �. >'t, I07 • .0! ' 101• f •} .z:. '��yyll .� .VDT ST ' 707 03 i�]�6>31 t T � � 133 111 F"�;J•� 176 12 131 130 12t[ f 8 101• ID �T3•'"' " _-^' - 1 • ' :t lis 116 719+ 1!6' 12D s 173= i 0i• .�-�, r r :70 171' Tu[ f •�'$•,` _ __� 112 117 !17 1:! 171 s 17744r 361. 136• i71� _ • .��y�•,�._. ry '�/ � 139 L"cu ,•' y Ate- _-••c: T1 :.did ®i V. 1 38. ' 13 13:Y 17 _ (j3' 9 �•` �- _, SE rf t 1[ 0,• �� !33• ------------------ L1 • C• �.� ! ^1135 !j :-. > 1C r s=j•.�. Cdr • y'a,�' 137 130 :' c.rn[ y `i fir�y. •C '� k. ° _ ♦ 177 - }02 / - • "� ' _ tD!• _ �` {'0 9n!- �..1 ` �12'/�JCf 5. I- 7• 17. !1 _ 17a• s*D '+ • .7D f..... • • 103 miss 1•._ a6•• :z9 I t r� • • t_-�n.�•: D• 3. 1 i x -t J A 3 _yi•• 5g¢i 1 1•'=✓ - I: •-,�_�:70� t:_! r,il� ,1--� at � '?`'9 � - ♦ r 3 1 �I� 77 t].li• t ,`.. 7 .6� �c4 �f•=�c u` 4 '� ,.' n 4 •T. i t 1f 'b , . y �f - � - `-a • E_-.i �'-• • �'.i o le 'j%45 t `� �" 130.. � C` (♦ t _• rt �. 213 iii~ . ^/ _ % �•• ` `aA �� i.�ew'c. C�_ `taa r 7 11•• 1D ?t aD? j•_�sivr.i�� J 4 907• .lK`rL j . - !Ob 11Y-"` / - _ w.f d •.4C c r.f.. _ •~! •1, , DJ- ! '•.,176.76 � ,::�••. f.. �: tl 713• N . .. _rte• .,, 7D9• �.s...� C9 `. r+ �/• __. _ - �wi. -«C9 /R. -d_Y':'_Z ! .. v4 �f :DS• eYYY ?]• 2:3' 901 A.. 5 " 4_... -«$. l� v,e ��*��+ y� (t.. 71i• 4 1°• ]D. ,Iy. ; c7C_� ry c._/i� i{y+� rZ _cs• -.-_:1 '•ti....l . �!' t'S :3 A =,��yyYYi.6\9 F- 1 zlf• 779' y 1 r b �-\i - _- t _ ....._JJJH t. 1,''> �" '� r-^�a "�i—T �„- • . Y •:S _ 139• - 1�✓f j jt-� 21 e. • r�- -' ]c9 =J � s1 '�rd�L a om 109 21 100 70 1.�,/.J•S .F "�J� ol(2rvl[• lOt .6. .. } •�li": -71 D••• - _e T��K.'.1 i!:10 l0b• - - �- .. �O3• -7:..,�.: i r A CEd. M _ yT '- 1 Z .•.A03 1-- -C ..11 sr L _ _ �'�.. �.Yom' • It �� J ^(�•• ts; ~ "J _. rt..FT �a_ C �d 2.1- 212- / .01 r�>trr- ..'t, _ .._ g c- - r 712•-- S - - ig`' AV ! _ ►'EZ_._ - .•'y'Y Lam_YT ''� �-• _._'yx' _-- .i' - � �' t r � � J ,,,CnDa t •7, •rs.+-'�� S � + 1'� ^a'_�.►�� r�- L q J 1 2J t -t.ry t-.t �`-'I Y?�..r'[*[ . 7D.�".l- Z11 ;( �"� •�-', ft, , C.� 77 71s• ]::• .:.,1 •_ 1 -� - '�� • •-/ �/� 71a i 219 . r'y'.`f• � 9' r-tY�' 770 1Q-��,'...i�L�. I µl k�-yjjjZ-�'.� - _' .. -.r � � _ _ •o - - - j �~ � 1: ' �Fr��t T _� _• >�„ (-� - � 101 9u t,,r __- ` e!i• .` C 7• sit 271• a .�•'` �-+ ./ er •liz- V it mit' s:. .' ^:•_.' T 1J ?t 9.tMj,.,_ _r• 220 • - :�-.�* "" .' 703• o /� -_ .:1• -~i, ~ y.;;.;u+— _.-.� sF- �.'•`rJ}`" i '7�• - "l `'0' t3 6 a3+c� ..a..•j.. IJ RH ED 053 (/�V V �J r� Lt• . - rl �r.'! �1'f - 1.f' to �. r t f n� � 1ta 1.!• _ :d I r•T[ 2.21 _--- i •0 >3w 31 + 177' a g�'5-'^a 0 aF� r•. n I .l FFY F f v � � �'��e .._..,.. .♦ Yl,�' '._..`.cr"-rS. � -l• _ __ _.'.- �v� ^q v "-'!a{ ��C ] ,fes` '/��/ LR.`.=A`e. _�:J.• �� _ .t �/ / � I Form Approved OMB No. 63R-1471 Page 1 of 2 pages U.S. L ARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPi HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE III. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE CURRENT YEAR GOAL 1, Nh'.'c OF A.'PLICANT 3. ORIGINAL CITY OF TIGARD AMENDMENT. DATE: 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR F ROM: TO: NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED ` ELDERLY OR ------ --" LARGE ALL FAMILY FAMILY HANDICAPPED TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE HOUSEHOLDS ('t of less (i or more (1-3 persnns) persons) persons) .-A. NEW RENTAL UNITS 1 1. Section 8-HUD --- 2 2. State A_en_cy--Tgtal (Sum of lines a and b) — ---- ----- - - - - - --_ 3 a. Section 8 5-o of -- 4 b. Other ----- - ---- - -- --- - 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing 5 (Identify) - Total _ - --- - - ----- - -- - 73 b. s 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2,and 3) 2 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 9 1. Section 8-HUD - ------ - "--"`— — 10 2. Slate Agency-Toto l (Sum of lines a and b) _---- ---- ----- -- -'-" I t a. Section 8 - - --- - --- --- 12 b. Other -- ---- - --- -- 3. Other Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing 13 —(Identify) - Total --- - 14 0, 15 -- 16 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2,and .3) r C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS 1� 1. Section 8-HUD 24 —14 ___-- ----1_Q__.-_-_-- --0-- is 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of lines u and b) --- --------- 19 a. Section 8 20 b. Other _ 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identify) Toial - — - - P24 a. b. O 4. Total (Si,,?, of lines 1,2, and 3) 24 14 ID. REHABIL:. ION ASSISTANCE 70 HOMEOWNERS OR — PROSPEt- s IVE HO�AFOWNERS 2s 1. CD Block G:_rlis 26 2. Section 235 ------ 27 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective homeowners(Identify) - Total 2S a. -- 30 47NEW Sum of lines 1,2, and 3) ECONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 31 1. Section 235 30 32 2. Other(Identify) - Total b34- b 35 3. Total (Sum of tines 1 and 2) 30 14 10 0 36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 56 (Sum of lines A4,B4,C4,D4, and E3) HUD-7015.10(12-75) Page 23 of 26 Pages Page 2 of 2 pages • U.S. 'ARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOI T HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE 111. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE THREE YEAR GOAL 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 3. ORIGINAL CITY OF TIGARD AMENDMENT, DATE: 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR F ROM: T0: NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED ELDERLY OR FAMILY. LARGE TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE ALL HANDICAPPED (}Uric,+; FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS (1-2 persons) persons) (i or more. persons) (a) (b) (c) (d) fe) A. NEW RENTAL UNITS 1 1. Section 8-HUD - 2 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of lines a and b) 3 a. Section 8 k6 4 b. Other — ------ — 5 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing (Identify) - Total - - --- -- -- - --- - --- a. --------- —--- b — -- -- --- --- — —- -- - - ---- 6 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2,and 3) 10 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 9 1. Section 8-HUD - -------- 1 0 2. State Agency-Total (Sum of lines a and b) t t a. Section 8 _- - ------ -- --- 12 b. Other - 3. Othf:r Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing 13 (ld::nufy) - Total — -------- ----- ----. -. 14 a, --- --- ------- - ----- --- 15 b, -- -- ---—----- ---— 16 4. Total (Sum of lines 1,2, and 3; C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: 17. 1. Section 8–HUD — _ _72_-- – 52 _ZQ---------— -0 1 s 2. State Agency-Total (sum of lines u and b) 19 a. Section 8 20 b. Other 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identify)- Total _ — — 2 2 a. 2 23 b, -- 24 4. Total (Sum of lines 71 2, and 3) 72 52 20 0 D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 25 1. CD Block Grants 26 2. Section 235 27 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners(Identify) - Total _-- B218 b. 3o 4. Total (Surn of lines 1,2, rind 3) E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS —_ 3t 1. Section 235 - 30* 32 2. Other(Identi/;) B331ea, b. 35 3. Total (Sum of lines 1 and 2) 36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS (Sum n/lines .44,134,C4,D4, and F_3; 112 1 52 1100 ro 4 6 18 0 37 PERCENT OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS G. EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES(4.tuch additional pages) *HUD' s contract authority to ensure Section 235 has expired as of June 30, 1976 and to date has not been renewed. This action therefore rrecl�u es a -c free year boar—pro j ec zon. HUD-7015.10(12-75) Pah'e 24 of 26 Dares . Form Approved OMB No. 63R-1471 • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE IV - GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED LOWER INCOME HOUSING 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 3. ORIGINAL CITY OF TIGARD AMENDMENT, DATE: 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YEAR F ROM: TO: A. IDENTIFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP IN THIS APPLICATION 1, New Constracti,n: Census Tract Numbers 309, 319 2: Rehabilitation: Census Tract Numbers 309, 319 B. EXPLANATION OF SELECTION OF GENERAL LOCATIONS L New Construction Area . 1 A. General Location Census Tracts 308 and 319 1 . To be constructed approximately 30 multi-family units. B. Criteria 1 . Proposed location for construction of housing units is within close proximity to senior citizens center. 2. The project site development will be in conformance with zoning in the area. 3. buss Transportation and shopping facilities will be within walking distance of proposed project site. Area 2 A. General Location Census Tracts 309 and 319 1 . To be constructed approximately 10 single family units. B. Criteria 1 . Prevention of deterioration a. The infusion of new construction i-n the neighborhood will tend to reduce the deleterious effect on vacant land in the area and serve to prevent the decline or decay of existing housing stock. 2. The availability of public services to include bus line and shopping center is close to proposed development site. 3. Availability of existing services, i . e. sanitary sewer lines. 4. The amount of vacant available land is conducive to the proposed site area. + HUD-7015.11 cit—'S; m " O o T s 0 e m 0 0 c 0 0 A m IV I PROPOSED HCD HOUSING ASSISTANC • AREASa-- M � j � w•'' \ r t��7a�iyl J��1��_0� .I FAL -'` 1:30� 1: '��s •� "gig n• ,fit•. ✓ �� d. • ©• °•, t('i ten.. / "n ' J� % ,`- r ,0 CZY Page 26 of 26 Pages CITY OF TI ARD P. O. Box 23557 12420 S. W. Main Tigard; Oregon 97223 August 139 1976 'Mr. Floyd B. Arms Director Community Planning and Development Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmE:nt Cascade Building 520 S.W. 6th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 Dear Itiir. Arms: Tigard's HCD Grant Application has been submitted to both CRAG and the State Clearing House for A-95 review. CRAG' s comments are included but the state review comments have not yet been made available to this office. On August 13, 1976, we received a letter (attached) stating that the State Department of Land Conservation and Development has requested an extension of the .A-95 rev-'ew time. The City has met all of the ti;�e deadlines as required by Rules and Regulations Subpart E. Applications and Criteria of Discretionary Grants 570.400 General (d) (2) . We are, therefore, concerned that -the State's request for an A-95 review time extension does not negatively affect the City's grant request. Sincerely, Bruce Clark City Administrator BC/p a i EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT F • C0 rn � '6' INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS DIVISION 240 COTTAGE STREET S.E. • • • • SALEM, OREGON 97310 ROBERT W. STRAUB GOVERNOR STAFFORD HANSELL � � ��I�� Augusta 11, 1976 Director }U 1 63 19 yJ Mr. Bruce P. Clark CITY, of, TIGARG City Administrator City of Tigard P.O: -Box 23557 Tigard, Oregon. 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Re : Community Development Block Grant Program PNRS #76.07 2 550 This is to- notify yo.u. that the Department of Land Conservation and Development has requested an extension of review time as allowed by OMB Circular A-95. We will .attempt .to expedite matters in order to cause you the least possible .inconvenience. Sincerely, William H. Young Administrator WHY:lg i (b) Motion to adopt, Councilman Cook, seconded -by Councilman Mickelson. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 15. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 8000 P.M. (a) HUD APPLICATION - Tigard City Council requested input to discuss making final application to the Housing and Urban Development Department for a Housing and Community Development Block Grant for Fiscal Year 1976-77. ( 1 ) Public Hearing Opened. (2) Planning Director reiterated what the grant covered. (3) Public Testimony. Unidentified person stated he was supportive of the application, Mrs. Manley, Tigard - Questioned if road would be widened before putting in pedestrian/bikepatho Mr. Mack, S.W. Greenburg Road - Expressed concern about drainage ditch and narrowness of road. Roscoe minters, 11545 S.W. Greenburg Road - Questioned which side of road pathway would be developed and also expressed concern about infringment of his property. Marvin Winters, Rt. 4 Box 242, Hillsboro - Expressed concern about street development. (4) Planning Director recommended Council approval. (5) Public Hearing Closed. (6) Motion by Councilman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman Cook to approve HUD application and adopt resolution No. 76-65. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. (b) CONDITIONAL USE - Review by the City Council. of Conditional Use by R.C. Malin Company to locate a Department of Motor Vehicles building in a M-4 zone (Industrial Park at 12985 S.W. Hall Blvd. (Wash. Co. Tax Map 2S1 2DA, Tax Lot 200 ( 1 ) Public Hearing Opened. (2) Planning Director reviewed Planning Commission' s approval of Conditional Use 18-76 subject to the following conditions. 1 . That Design Review emphasize vegetative landscaping along S.W. Hall and S.W. Burnham. 2. The right of way necessary to bring S.W. Hall Blvd. and S.W. Burnham St. to code be dedicated. 3. The applicant agree to participate in the LID on S.W. Burnham St. and S.W. Hall Blvd. Planning Director further stated the motion that approved CU 18-76 also included approval of a varience (V-5-76) 0 PAGE 4 - COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 99- , 1976 CITY OF TIGARD$ OREGON RESOLUTION No. 76-_L, 5 WHEREAS, the City of Tigard intends to formally apply for funds to the Housing and Urban Development Department authorized by the F.ousind and Ca-rmunity Development Act of 1974; and WHEREAS, the applicant desires to submit an application for assistance to help provide for a system of safe, efficient and effective pedestrian and bicycle movement within the community; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of this governing body to provide a link in the deve Opment of a long range and coordinated program on the lo'.?al, regional, state and national level. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of .Tigard THAT the City of Tigard hereby applies for a Housing and Community Development Block Grant commencing in fiscal year 76777 until completion of the project; and THAT the City. Administra.for is hereby authorized to make application for and in behalf of the City of Tigard and to provide such additional information and assurances as may be required to carry out the goals of the Act, and to otherwise act as the authorized representative of the City in connection with all matters pertaining to the application and any Housing and Community Development Grant agreement that may be executed pursuant to the application. PASSED: This day of 41, 1976. Mayor - City of Tigard ATTEST: Recorder City of Tigg' d ov AFFIDAVIT 0,-PUBLICATION - STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, I ss. CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF- I• - - ------------TA's eph—SCh -wr-------------------------- — —- PUBLIC HEARING HOUSING AND URBAN being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher ________—____ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ' Notice is hereby giyen that a public, hearing will be held by the City Council j of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined at Fowler Junior High Lecti&Room,- 10865 S.W.Walnut Street,73gard;4Ire- by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and gon, on August 9, 1976; ab8Q, P.M. with respect to the follaWing:��". state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was The Tigard City Coun,414 request- ing your attendance and input to published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ___-1._____ successive anddiscuss making final apli tion to the ;Housing 'and- Urban Development Department for a Hou$ing and Com- consecutive weeks in the following issues ______-____--------- munity Development Block Grant for; fiscal year 19766-77. ---------August 5, 1926 ---__—_-- _ All-interested persons may appear, and.be heard in favor of-or against the j -— -- — 44-� said proposal. BY ORDER OF THE - (Si T CITY'COUNCIL Doris Hartig, Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____10th day of _________- City Recorder (TT 2853 —publish August 5, 1976) .............-----------------Ast 19-76 - -------- - ----------------------- otary Pub bof Oregon My commission expires �s,9ai �3� 112��rT ��OaF88 � �T3a� AND :a �:�V7 5 Yc15(�➢�1 STATE CLEAR I PIGOJSE DEPARTti1ENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND QEVELOP-MFNT Intergovernmental Relations Division 240 Cottage Street S .E. , Salem, Oregon 97310 h'U G j I C7D � . ;b Leslie Lehmann, Coordinator Phone: 378-3732 SALEM P N R S STATE R E V I EW Project # : 760 7 Z 550 Due Date: AIJGj 0 0 W6 To Agency Addressed: If you intendto comment but cannot respond by the return date, please notify us -immediately. If no response is received by the due date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the file will he closed. PROGRAM REVIEW AND COMMENT To State Clearinghouse: We have revie-ed the subject Notice and have reached the following conclusions on its relationship to ..our ..Plans and, programs : ( It has no adverse effect . ( ) We have no comment. ( ) Effects, although measurable , would be acceptable. ( ) It has adverse effects . ( ) We are interested but require more information to evaluate the proposal . ( ) Please coordinate the implementation of the proposal with us . ( ) Additional comments for project improvement. (Attach if necessary) REMARKS (Please type or print legibly) AgencyBy ,�; ;.j `:r.1r . 1', ' t;jl. .j1�,' 7606-2-55.0 This project and its related land use implications must be coordinated and consistent with the City of Tigard compre- hensive plan and efforts to update the plan (i.e. the city's ; compliance schedule and work program for reaching compliance . with the statewide land use goals) . In addition, the appli 3 cant should make every effort to insure that the project makes e 'use of recognized citizen and agency -involvement . programs i established by the local jurisdiction in. accordange with the i statewide land use goals.. 1 _ i _ 02 ,: g O Y Ey K T ION D -EME SYS EM STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Intergovernmental Relations Division 240 Cottage Street S.E. , Salem, Oregon 97310 `�UL3 : eslie Lehmann, Coordinator Phone: 378-3732 PNRS STATE REV I EW Project 4: 7607 2 550 Due Date: AtjG 06 1976 To Agency Addressed : If you intend to comment but cannot respond by the . return date, please notify us immediately. If no response is received by the du: date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the file will he closed. PROGRAM REVIEW AND COMMENT To State Clearinghouse.: We have revie—ed the subject Notice and have reached the. fol.lowing conclusions on its relationship to our plans and programs : ( ) It has no adverse effect . ( ) We have no comment. O Effects, although measurable, would be acceptable. ( ) It has adverse effects . ( ) We are interested but require more information to evaluate ,the proposal _ O Please coordinate the implementation of the proposal with us. ( ) Additional comments for project improvement. (Attach if necessary) 7- !_ REMARKS (Please type or print legibly) .r/�,j11 y�,/fir--,,O-c-�- -'_ - --^_ - -�'-' .,�-- - •,,- -- - - - .- v G _ r y Agency '� By r �_ ' YWICAMN AND krR"".V1"1"VJ SYSTEM GREGON PROJECT NO STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Intergovernmental Relations Division D 240 Cottage Street S.E. , Salem, Oregon 97310 JUL 1 91�1b Leslie Lehmann, Coordinator Phone: 378-3732 . DIVISION OF STATE LANDS P N R S S T A T E R E V I E W Project # • 760 1 2 5 O Due Date: AUG 0 n 1976 _ To Agency Addressed : If youj intend to comment but cannot respond by the return date, please notify us immediately. If no response is received by the due date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the file will he closed. PROGRAM REVIEW AND COMMENT To State Clearinghouse : We have revie-ed the subject Notice and have reached - the following conclusions on its relationship to our plans .and programs : ( ) It has no adverse effect . ( ) We have no comment. ( ) Effects, although measurable, would be acceptable. ( ) It has adverse effects . ( ) We are interested but require more information to, evaluate the . proposal . ( ) Please coordinate the implementation of the proposal with us . ( additional comments for project improvement. (Attach if necessary) REMARKS (Please type or print legibly) < :t:f the project would require the removal,, fill or alteration of 50 f r,,ibic yards .or more of material within the banks of the watertaay(s) , we urge the applicant to apply for state fill or removal_ well- in advance of construction deadlines .to prevent unnecessary project d rays. Specific in fonriation on the need for pern-ts may be obtained irom the Division of Sta-e Lands' office at 1445 State Street, Salem, . OR 97310. Phone 378-3005. Thank you for the oDoortunity to comment on this vroiect. AgencyCla Y� AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF OREGON, ' COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss. — CITY OF I, -----------------------------c jDs_O'_P1L�lCha�'L--r------------------------------ --- ------- NOTICE OF PUBLIC RHEARING HOUSING AND URBAN being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher _— DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Notice is hereby gi'verr that a public ----------— of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined hearing will be held by the City Council at Fowler Junior High Lecture Room, by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and ' 10865 S.W.Walnut Street,Tigard on July 26, 1976,at 8:00 P.M.with state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was 'respect to'tike following: • The Ti I published in the entire issue of said newspaper for ____-�___ Tigard City Council is-request- ing i successive and ing your attendance and input to -discuss making final application to the consecutive weeks in the following issues _____._____—----------_—-------_________—___.—___ ;Housing and Urban Development` -De ment for a and Com- -- I ok22! 1976 ! maitDeelomentBlocGrant or year All interested-persons may appear - ign r al and be heaid or, rd in favor of or against the i ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Subscribed and sworn to before me this ___.._._22nd _ __ day of ---____--- Doris klartig, City Recorder (TT 2833 —Publish July 22, 1976) --------------------------------------!!Rly 19-- 76 ---------- --i------------ -------- =- -- ------------ ttaary Public Oregon My commission expires _—____. 19 L_I_. ® COLUMBIA REGION ASSOCIATION of GOVERIMENTS -- C'RG 527 S.�W.'HALL STREET (503) 221-1646 PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 LARRY RICE„EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR July 219 1976 REGULAR MEMBERS CLACKAMASCOUNTY Barlow Cary pec ,9i6 Canby Estacada Gladstone O Happy Valley Johnson City Lake.Oeego Milwaukikie P''Ir• Bruce P. Clark Molana City Administrator Oregon City City of Tigard Rrvergrove Bendy West Linn 12420 SW Main Street Wilsonville Tigard, Oregon: 97223 MULTNOMAH.COUNTY GmFairvresha am Re: A-95 Review Gresh Maywood Park City of Tigard Portland Troutdale Final Community Development Block Grant Application. Troutdale ' Wood Village WASHINGTON COUNTY Dear Mr. Clark: Banks Beaverton Corneliuss Pursuant to Part .I of OMB Circular A-95 Revised,. the CRAG Durham staff. reviewed the final application. submitted by. the City Forest Grave of Tigard for a Community Development Block Grant and found Gaston Hillsboro the application. to be consistent with the on-going planning KingPla North Plains process.:. Sherwood Tigard Tualatin Cordially yours, ASSOCIATE MEMBERS CLARK COUNTY ! ... Vancouver Camas Larry Rice Columbia city Executive Director Scappoose St.Helens LR::gh The Port of Portland Tri-Met The State of Oregon z Oa n n Iwf C� OREGON PkOJECT NOTIFICATION Ate® REVIEW SYSTEM fi. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Intergovernmental Relations Division 240 Cottage Street S.E. , Salem, Oregon 97310 F� Leslie Lehmann, Coordinator Phone: 378-3732 J U L I CITY OF. TIGARD PROJECT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT APPLICANT: City of Tigard PROJECT TITLE:_Community Development DATE RECEIVED : July 16, 1976 PNRS #: 7607 2 550 Your 'project has been assigned the file title and number that appear above. Use this reference in all future correspondence regarding this project. Initial 30-day State Clearinghouse review of your Notice XX of intent began on the above date . The 30-day State Clearinghouse review of your final application began on the above date. cc f Initial 30-day State Clearinghouse review of this HUD Housing project began in the above date. a Initial 30-day State Clearinghouse review of your Direct Federal Development project began on the above date. El The 30-day State Clearinghouse review of your final !, Environmental Impact Statement began on the above date . ❑ Initial 45-day State Clearinghouse review of your draft Environmental Impact Statement began on the above date . The 45-day State Clearinghouse review of your State Plan/ Amend ,ent began on the above date. If you have questions or need assistance, contact the State Clear- inghouse at the above address and telephone number. t 1 )OTC% (A 90d�1 tM IYY�c11 p c ; d-�.��5, �u76 �►. C�edr�n Jha,sG Qe�►�.v i a , '( CITY OF `CIGAR® P. 0. Box 23557 . 12420 S. W. Main Tigard, Oregon 97223 -July 15, 1976 Mr. Floyd B. Arms Director Community Planning and Development Department of Housing and Urban Development Cascade Building 520 S.W. 6th Avenue Portland, Oregon 9.7204 - Dear Mr. Arms: The enclosed Housing and Community Development discretionary block grant application with additional required forms and materials are submitted for your review and approval . The pro- posed project, as approved from the pre-application, involves construction of pedestrian-bicycle paths in a lower income area of the city of Tigard. Two aspects of the application require clarification: - 1 . The pre-application omitted any budget for administration of the project and for acquisition. of easements, so these essential elements have been allocated financial resources in the application . These additional costs will not represent a change in activities or -the substitution of different activities from those proposed in the pre-application and there- fore are in keeping with Subpart E - Applications and Criteria for Discretionary Grants 570.402 (e) application requirements. 2. The absence from Portland of the -local HUD economist, Gary Gillespie,. during the preparation of the application precluded his assistance in the critical task of data assembly for the . Housing Assistance Plan, especially., for Table II . The lack of a"scessible data has required reliance on more highly aggregated figures and less precise methods. _of estimation, as outlined An the HAP. We have tried. to .'employ, the best alternative methods by contacting numerous other government agencies . It should be added that the housing survey proposed in the application will answer many of the remaining questions and correct our estimations. Sincerely, L Bruce P. Clark City Administrator BPC: sf a Q Nr o,,o .. t oa Q °°a DE PAS. � MENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEN, _OPMENT PORTLAND AREA OFFICE s,*I '106. Ia° CASCADE BUILDING,520 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 p May 25, 1976 REGION X / JA/�'I Arcade Plaza Building / 1321 Second Avenue /J�r1I n Seattle,Waahington 98101 t ` IN REPLY REFER TO: �'J/ 10.2FR(Snarr) 221-2686 The Honorable Wilbur Bishop Mayor of the City of Tigard City Hall Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mayor Bishop: Subject: Invitation for Existing Housing Program Application Section 8 Housing Assistance Program The Department of Housing and Urban Development will accept Applications to administer an Existing. Housing Program. throughout the county of Washington, Oregon. An identical letter is being sent to the Governor and to all municipalities- and other government entities, advising them that they may submit applications if they believe they are authorized to engage or' assist in the development or operation of low-income housing. The total number of units is approximately 100,' assuming the average size is, a two-bedroom unit.. Enclosed is a schedule for the Existing Housing Fair Market Rents. An administrative fee calculated at 811 percent of the two-bedroom, non- elevator, Existing Fair Market Rent is allowed for the cost of establishing the program and bringing into it the total number of families to be assisted. The HUD Area Office believes that the "Finders-Keepers" policy is best able to maximize the tenants' choice of housing when a PHA serves a broad geographi- cal area, and this will be considered by HUD in making a final PHA approval. Applications must be received no later than 4:00 pm on June 28, 1976, and are to be submitted to the Portland HUD Area Office, 520 S.W. 6th, Portland, Oregon 97204. Upon request, we will be pleased to provide you with copies of Form No. HUD 52515, Application for Existing Housing, and the applicable Program regulations, and also to meet with you to assist in the development of your Application. Sincerely, Rlel l H. Dawson Area Director Enclosure SCHEDULE FOR EXISTING HOUSING FAIR MARKET RENTS FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY. 0-BR 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR Non-Elevator $136 $155 $185 $213 $232 iaevator 151 172 203 233 256 it rtyENY° F DEPA MENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN_ DEQ,—L.OPMENT ' = PORTLAND AREA OFFICE ,'� IIIIIIII acv CASCADE BUILDING, 520 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 °�3"3ON April 15, 1976 REGION X Arcade Plaza Building 1321 Second Avenue Seattle,Washington 98101 IN REPLY REFER TO: Mr. Bruce P. Clark City Admi:ni strator, 'City of Tigard RECEIVED 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: CITY, OF. TIGARD Subject: CDBG Full Application On April 9, 1976, Mr. Dawson; Director of this office, invited you to submit a full application for the. Storm Sewer and Paths Located in Low Income Area 2 and the Comprehensive Housing Stock Survey as proposed in your preapplication in the amount of $121 ,263. Enclosed are copies of the full application forms and a copy of the full CD Block Grant Regulations as published in the Federal Register. We believe the following comments will assist you in the preparation of your application. Your CPD Representative on the HUD staff is Ralph Greeno. He can be reached at 221-2601. The earliest and latest dates for a complete full application are June 15 and August 15, 1976. Please note that materials submitted must include all which are required and excess material should not be submitted. As you construct your administrative costs, keep in mind the requirements for your compliance with federal statutes other than HUD as covered in your Certification. These are legitimate administrative costs. These activities include National Environmental Policy, Federal Management Circulars 74-4 and 74-7, Labor Standards, Flood Hazards, Civil Rights Acts and Executive Orders, and the Uniform Acquisition and Relocation Act. The latter is applied if you acquire any interest in real estate rights in any manner. We continue to urge .that you work with your Council of Governments staff in applying the CDBG regulations to your situation. 2 . We look forward to your full application as early as you can .develop. it wi..thin requirements. Sincerely, Floyd B.1 Arms Director Community Planning. & Development Enclosures i i i i j . I 1 1 i ` v�tMEaT 00 -' LLDEPARTMENT OF HOUSING.AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PORTLAND AREA OFFICE 's�' IIIIII�+cc CASCADE BUILDING,520 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 REGION X � q,l � April 9, 1976. Arcade Plaza Building 1321 Second Avenue _ Seattle,.Washington 98101r ,� - IN REPLY REFER TO. t� 1 1U 75 CITY OF TIGARD Mr.. Bruce P. Clark City Administrator, City of Tigard 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Dear Mr. Clark: Subject: CDBG Application Invitation This is in response to your preapplication for Metropolitan Discretionary Block Grant Funds which compared well with others received. In our previous correspondence, we indicated we would evaluate and rate the preapplications and inform you of results. We received 7 acceptable pre- applications totaling $2,497,282. On the basis of our review of preapplications as specified in 570.402(c) and the Region X Rating System, we invite you to submit a full application in the . amount of $121 ,263 for the activities as proposed in your preapplication: Storm Sewer and Paths Located in Low Income Area 2 Greenburg-Pacific Highway to Tiedeman (2) $ 58,948 Tigard-Main to Tiedeman (4) 57,265 Sub Total 3116:213 Comprehensive Housing Stock Survey 512050 Total $121 ,263 The earliest and latest dates for submission of your application are June 15 and August 15, 1976. Your application must comply fully with HUD regulations as provided in 570.400 and .402 on HUD forms which will be forwarded to you shortly. Your certifi- cations will require citizens participation among other actions. Changes in your proposed activities will not be approved if they change our, rating of your preapplication. Your application rated among the top 9 activities which we expect to be able to fund within the $865,000 available to this office. As .a result, if your full 1 ♦ y - i 2 application receives acceptable final reviews and meets all requirements, I expect to be able to provide approval of your.grant reasonably close to the cited figure for the activity listed. 0. ther . storm sewer and path projects which you requested did not rate. high enough to permit a full application invitation. If you have further questions, please contact my Community Development staff at 221-2601. Sincerely, Russell H. Dawson Area Director ` I . 'P%WEN)°f 1 - b�° ((� (Ii °�N DEPARTMEOF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELO. :NT PORTLAND AREA OFFICE y CASCADE BUILDING. 520 S.W. SIXTH AVENUE, PORTLAND,OREGON 97204 REGION X March 22, 1.976 Arcade Pla" Building 1321 Second Avenue Seattle,Washington 98101 IN REPLY REFER TO: 10.2D (Arms) 221-2601 Mr. Bruce P. Clark RECEIVEn City Administrator, City of Tigard MAR 2n. 14; 12420 S. W. Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 CITY nr. Dear Mr. Clark: Subject: ` Community Development Block Grant Funds (Metropolitan General Purpose Funds) Preayplication We are pleased to advise you that the above identified preapplication was accepted for processing on this date. During the four week period following the March 15th deadline, this office expects to (1 ) evaluate all preapplications, (2) apply the Region X Rating System (attached) , (3) announce invitations to submit full applications and (4) inform unsuccessful applicants of that status. The receipt of this letter in no way indicates approval of yourrpee- application. My compliments to you and your community for submitting what appears to be an excellent proposal . Sin el , Aoy Arms Director Community Planning Development Attachment REGION X - H'U'D DISCRETIONARY BLOCK GRANT RATING SYSTEM In accord with 570. 402(c) , the attached Rating System for pr-eap•plications will prevail in the Area. Offices of . Region X. In ad.di.tion ,, no prea,pplication.s for non4etropolitan or metrovolitan fundina will be accented from .a single applicant for more than $500 ,000 in Alaska , Oreao_n or Washington . In Idaho , the maximum is established at $300,000. These figures are established as authorized in 570. 402 (d ) . December, 11 , 1975 • _ SEA 6210.2 APPENDIX XVI Dec. lig 1975 Appendix XVI• Rating System Metro and Non-Metro General Purpose Discretionary Funds The CPD Rep will batch all applications into groups that will be in competition with each other. The Rep .will note the percentage of poverty, extent of poverty, percentage of substandard housing and extent of substandard housing and document this on SEA FORM 10-D-14 and also prepare the su:..,ary sheet SEA FO.%4 10-D-15. .This data will be obtained from the consus bureau. These conditions are defined in 570.402. The Rep will then initiate the rating system by setting up quadrants into which each applicant will fall. This will be done based on each of the following criteria categories: 1. Percentage of poverty 2. Extent of poverty 3. Percentage of substandard housing 4. Extent of substandard housing The quadrants will be established in the following manner. Take as an example, percentage of poverty. If the range is from 10% for the lowest to 26% for the highest, the range difference is 16%. Dividing this by 4 will give us 4%. Therefore, the lowest quadrant will be. those co.ii.-*iunities in 10% to 14%, the next 14% to 18%, the next 18% to 22% and the next 22% to 269.. This method for grouping into quadrants will be applied to each of the above mentioned criteria categories. The top quadrant will be given 4 points, the next 3 points and the next 2 points and the lowest quadrant 1 point. These points will be transferred onto the rating sheet, columns 1, 2, 5 and 6. The next step in the rating process will be done by a rating panel chaired by t-he CPD Director or the lead Rep at the option of the CPD Director with a ninir..um of 2 CPD Reps. In Anchorage and Boise the panel may consist of the CPD Director, I.O. Deputy Director and the CPD Rep. The panel ::ill complete the rew.ainin:; colwms on the ratinn, sheet for each pro;;ect activity included in the arplication. The.point rarse •-ill be deterrined on the oasis of consensus using the follo-vrin� criteria. 1 . 12/75 HUD-Wash..D.C. SEA 6210.2 ' APPENDIX XVI Poverty-Project (Column 4) This is a relationship of the project as to how it -addresses poverty and would primarily benefit persons of low and moderate income. 1. Minimal relationship of the project to the communities' poverty condition. 1 point. 2. No direct relationship of the project to the communities' poverty condition, but there is a possible indirect impact. 2 points. 3. There is a direct or indirect relationship of the project to the poverty area. 3 points. 4. There is a direct or indirect relationship of the project to the communities poverty condition and will have a significant impact on that condition, i.e. , the project will appear to improve the economic base of the community. 4 points. Note: Poverty points will be weighted twice as shown on the rating sheet. Housing Project (Coli;:--n 3) This is a relationship of the project as to how it addresses substandard housing. 1. 1�inimal or no relationship of the project to the communities' substandard housing condition. 1 point. 2. No direct relationship of the project to the communities' substandard housing condition but there is a possible indirect • impact. 2 points. 3. There is a defininte direct or indirect relationship of the project to the communities' substandard housing conditions. 3 points. 4. The project will substantially contribute to improving the substandard housing conditions. 4 points. Impact (ColiLmn 9) This is a relationship of the project as to how it addresses the extraordinary high rate of growth or a severe decline in population and economic activity (caused -primarily by national policy or Federal programs) . 1. Minimal or no relationship of the project to mitigate the condition or the condition does not exist. 1 point. Dec. 11i, 1975 2 12/75 HLM-Wash.. D. C. -SEA 6210.2 APPENDIX XVI 2. No direct relationship of the project to mitigate the condition but there may be some indirect impact. 2 points. 3. There is a definite direct and/or indirect relationship of the project to mitigate the condition. 3 points. 4. There is a definite* relationship of the project to mitigate the condition and there will be a significant impact. 4 points Imminent Threat (Colunn 10) This is a relationship of the project j as to how it addresses a condition which represents an imminent threat to public health or safety. 1. Mini-nal or no relationships of the project to the condition or the condition does not exist. 1 point. 2. No direct relationship of the project to mitigate the condition but there may be some indirect inpact. 2 points. 3. There is a definite relationship of the project to partially eliminate the threat. 3 points 4. There,is definite relationship of the project to substantially eliminate the threat. 4 points. Flan (Colum-11) This is the consistency of the .proposed activity with local and areawide plans. if the proposed act .vity• contribute to the inplementation of the• areawide and local plans and is supported by the A-95 clearinghouse comments give 2 points - otherwise 0 points. Total points trill be noted in coli rn 12 and the order of rating in colunn 13. e A cut-off point .rill 're deter• d—ned or. the basis of funds available. Those co:,Lmmnities with activities or activity above the cut-off will be asked to s-,!brit a final aonlication for the designated activities or activity and amount. Dec. 110 1975 3 12/75 HUD-Wash., D. C. SEA 6210.2 . APPE`DIX XVI Pre-Application CD Block Grant Program SL.k FONM 10-D-14 Discretionary Crants Prepared By COMUNITY DATA Date POVERXY SUBSTANDARD HOUSLNG MMUNITY % Extent % Extent 1 2 ' 3 y 5 ' G 7 8 10 11 . 12 13 14 • ].5 15 17 18 19 • 20 4 12/75 CD BLOCK GRANT PROGIMM Prepared By DISCRETIONARY GRANTS Date SUM IARY SHELT PROJ. NAME OF LOCATION GRANT AMT. ACKNOWLEDGED/ NO. APPLICANT OF PROJECT POPULATION REQUESTED DESCRIPTION OF WORK REJECTED ti z H O N r C/4 . SEA FORM 10-D-15 CD BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM Discretionary Grant Insuring Office Xr\ RATING SHEET REGION X Area Office Dane o } P.re-Application ►'� N . X APPLICANT POVERTY HOUSING IMPACT I121IN i PLANS TOTAL RAND z ACTIVITIES Communit Pro' . (2x) Community Pro' . Tfi1za; to W . 1 2 3 4 5 6 . 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 c 4 e 7 3° 10 ( ) ( ) ( ) Fa:1 ( > _ 12 - - 13 ) 14 ( ) O ( ) ) ( ) Column 1 = points for percentage of poverty Column 5 points for percentage of Date Column 2 = points for extent of poverty substandard housing Coluian 3 Column 1 + Column, 2-2 Column 6 = points for extent of o substandard housing SEA FORM 10-D-16 Column 7 Column 5 + Column 6 2 . Bracketed points will not be included in the total. FORM APPROVED OMB NO. 63=R-1479 1�1100 - U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AMv'URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1. State Cleoringht identifier PREAPPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 7602 2 570 2. Applicant's Application No. PART 3. Federal Grantor Agency. 4. Applicant Name Dept, of Housing and Urban Development City of Tigard Organizational Unit Department Division Portland Area Office 12420 SW Main St. Administrative Office St'reet.Address - P.O. Box 520 SW 6th Avenue Tigard, Washington Street Address - P.O. Box City County _pQ_r_tland, Oregon 97201 Oregon 97223 City State Zip Code State Zip Code S. Descriptive Nome of the Project Community Development Block Grant Program 6. Federal Cdtalog No. 7. Federal Funding Needed Metropolitan Discretionary Balance S 470,382.46* R. Grantee Type ' _State, County, X City, _Other (Specify) 9. Type of Assistance X Grunt, Loon, Other (Specify) in. population Directly Benefiting from the Project 12. Length of Project 10,020 (1975 census) 12-15 months 11. Congressional District 13. Beginning Date w 1st Congressional as soon as money becomes available b, lst Congressional 14. Date of Application March 15, 1976 15. The applicant certifies that to the best of his knowledge and belie(, the data in this pre application are true and correct, and the filing of the. preapplication has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant. i Typed name Title Telephone Number Bruce P. Clark City Administrator AREA CODE NUMBER EXT. Signature of authorized represents ' e 503 639-4171 { For Federal Use Only i HUD-4007 (1-75) 'This figure represents total project .cost. Proposed projects page.1of 2 pages would be conducted in phases. See part .IV, item 2 for detailed explanation. Ij Form Approved OMB No. •R- 479 `.PREAPPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASST,—ANCE PART II INDICATE ANSWER BY PLACING"X'* IN PROPER COLUMN YES NO 1. Does this assistance request re vire State• localregional or other priority rating? _ _ X 2. Does this assistance require state or lotal advisory, educational or health clearance? X 3. Does this assistance request require Clearinghouse review? X 4. Does this assistance request require State, local,regional or other planning approval? X 5. Is the proposed project covered by an approvedcomprehensive plan? ERA X= 6 Will the assistance requested serve a Federal installation? X 7. Will the assistance requested be on Federal land or installation? X 8. Will the assistance r uested have an effect on the enviromenR X 9. Will the assistance requested cause the displacement of individuals, families, businesses, or farms? X 10. Is there other related assistance foi this project previous pending, oranticipated?' X 11. Flood Hazard Insurance Requirements a. The project 03 is ❑ is not located in an area designated by HUD as an area having special flood hazards under the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973(P.L. 93-234) b. The area in which the project is located has ❑ has not been identified by HUD as one in which sale of Flood Insurance has been made available under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968(42 U.S.C. 4001). PART III - PROJECT BUDGET TYPE OF FEDERAL CATALOG ASSISTANCE FIRST BUDGET BALANCE OF - TOTAL NUMBER LOAN, GRANT, ETC. PERIOD PROJECT (e) (b) (d) (e) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. G. Total Federal Contribution $470,386.46 7. State Contribution 0 8. Applicant Contribution 0 9. Other Contributions 0 10. Totals $470,386.46 PART IV - PROGRAM NARRATIVE STATEMENT (Attach Per Instructions) HUD-4007 (1.75) Page 2 of 2 pages *GPO 696.054 Part II Item 3: Clearinghouse. c9mments to be included when preapplication is submitted to HUD in order to comply with the procedures set forth in OMB Circular No. A-95. Item 4: The proposed pedestrian/bike path would require cooperation with the Washington County Public Works Department. • Approval of the project would be in conjunction with Washington Co. Public Works Department joint cooperation. Item 5: The Tigard ,Community Plan, adopted by ordinance in February, 1973, states that bikeways be constructed in order to provide safe access to neighborhood schools, parks, homes and com- mercial areas. In order to implement the intent and purpose of the bikeway portion of .the plan, the following policies and standards were established: 1. Establish separate rights-of-way for bicycle traffic in order to minimize conflicts between motor vehicles and cyclists. 2. Bikeways will be developed along the greenway system, wherever possible. 3. Utilize both planned unit development techniques and local, state and federal funds designated for bikeways to establish a continuous bikeway system. 4. Limit the use of bikeways to non-motorized vehicles, with pedestrian movement as a secondary use. Horses will be prohibited and motorized vehicles will be prohibited except for maintenance and patrol purposes. . Part IV - Program Narrative lA There is a definite need and community support for providing a pedestrian safety-oriented system of bikeways and walkways throughout the City, It is the community's concensus, based on public hearings, surveys, Comprehensive Pedestrian Bicycle Pathway Plan and Traffic Safety Study, that construction of bicycle and pedestrian walkways would do the most good for the greatest number of people as far as improving safety con- ditions along the City's roadways. There have been , serious accidents and even fatalities which have caused the community to be even more keenly aware of the existing danger to ped- estrian safety and the desire to see this problem corrected. The essential objective is to provide a safe and desirable pedestrian/bikeway system for youth, elderly and those seeking an alternative to automobile use. The secondary objective .is to develop a system :that will (a) tie to ether recreation areas, schools and their service areas; b provide protective buffers between incompatible land uses; c� reduce flood hazard City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon -2- by 2-by restricting development along natural drainage ways; (d) provide op ortunities for passive and active recreation activities; (e) preservethe amenity .of the City. 1B The average cost of housing within Tigard does not people of low and moderate '. the -.opportunity to housingc,otC - ` ' `_' Tigard, like many areas on the periphery of a large metropolitan city, is undergoing a transition from a rural oriented environipent to one of rapid suburban growth. As a result of this h= increase in the population, various development patterns have taken place. Particularly, with. the advent of the shopping complex (in this case, Washington Square) , hundreds of new jobs have been created, resulting in a need to house those workers employed by the businesses within the centers and the additional businesses that have been started as a direct spin-off of the nucleus. Many of those workers employed by these enterprises, . as well as businesses already established within the community, receive salaries which place them in a low and moderate income ca! ory. `-The-Housing Authority'�of- WasPi rigton County has ecor numerous requests by people who have expressed their desire to live in Tigard if housing were JjjjW available: to meet their incomes, resently:wi_thin the City of Tigard there area nits that are being subsidized through rent supplement payments under the jurisdiction of the 'Housing Authority of Washington( Count(/Y�''_��' ��'' To provide factual data that will delineate a more precise understanding of housing needs within the community, an ex- tensive survey of the existing housing stock 'would be under- taken. Particular emphasis would be directed toward derm�i ing the housing needs of the elderly and handicapped Pro Yr ms{ designed to achieve the greatest cost savings to thecommunity �"` �✓ such as land acquisition, subsidized sewer hookups and low interest rates arranged through private financial institutions will be considered, analyzed and applied wherever:-they might provide the most benefit to the community. The hiring of an additional staff member, working part time at a salary of $4,250, will be required to research and docu- ment the information .to be included within the comprehensive housing stock survey, plus related staff supported .services ,at a cost of $800. 1 Data source: Housing Authority .of Washington County, U. S. Bureau of Census for 1970. City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon 2A Based upon the community's concensus attained through public hearings, . surveys, comprehensive pedestrian bicycle. pathway plan and traffic safety study, the following list of projects, prioritized by. community need, would be carried out with community development block grant funding. The projects: are individually identified and a cost estimate has been assigned to each project proposal in order to allow for possible `` separate funding 'of. .the individual projects.` (refer to project schedule and map) City of Tigard ;Tigard, Oregon o D r 0 c D o D c!! T e D I-JL�uuL,u�uuL�ll—��=• BIKE & PEDESTRIAN! PATHS. E . . . -- PROPOSE® HCD EXISTING a- - TOBE . C®NlSTRUCTE® BY STATE M la � RL]LJU�®I�ln]®I klf � �: -+�:-sem-- ;'-�� -+ %�.Q�� .....-✓- s ,� �° M ,',: 1 � 5��5 L__.�l.y...J • E J - . PROJECT AND ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION - FIRST YEAR Pedestrian/Bike Path 1. McDonald - Pacific Highway to Hall Boulevard to 97th Avenue to School Length of Project: 8,000 ' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 203.70 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $24,000.00 c. Storm Sewer $96,000.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 101.85 e. Crossings/Signs $ 360.00 $120,665.55 % 2. }Greenburg - Pacific Highway to Tiedeman Length of Project: 3900' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 99.30 b. . Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $11,700.00 c. Storm Sewer (10") $46,800.00 1 d. Fill (soil) $ 49.65 e. Crossings/Signs $ 300.00 $ 58,948.95 3. Walnut - 121st to 128th Length of Project: 2400' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 61.10 b. Rock .and Class C Mix (asphalt) $ 7,200.00 c. ' Storm Sewer $28,800.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 30.55 e. Crossings/Signs $ 120.00 $ 36,211.65 4.)Tigard - Main to Tiedeman r Length of Project: 3800' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning and Grubing $ 96.74 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $11,400.00 c. Storm Sewer $45,600.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 48.37 e. Crossings/Signs $ 120.00 $ 57,265.11 Project and Activity Description Continued 5. Gaarde - Pacific Highway to Rose Vista Length of Project: . 3400' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning. & Grubing $ 86.56 b. Rock :and Class C Mix (asphalt) $10,200.00' c. Storm Sewer $40,800.00. d. Fill (soil) $ 43.28 e. Crossings/Signs $ 60.00 $ 51,189.84 6. Tiedeman - Greeburg to Walnut Length of Project: 3600' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 91.66 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $10,800.00 C. Storm Sewer $55,200.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 45.83.- e. Crossings/Signs $ 120.00 $ 66,257.49 7. Fonner - Tiedeman to walk on 115th Length of Project: 3600' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning and Grubing $ 91:66 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $10,800.00 C. Storm Sewer $33,600.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 45.83 e. Crossings/Signs $ 120.00 $ 44,657.49 . 8. Burnham - Hall Blvd. to Main Length of Projects 2000' Project Costs: a. Grading/Cleaning and Grubing $ 50.92 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $ 6,000.00 c. Storm Sewer - $24,000.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 25.46- e. Crossings/Signs $. 60.00 $ 30,136.38 Totals: a. Grading/Cleaning & Grubing $ 781.64 b. Rock and Class C Mix (asphalt) $ 92,100.00 c. Storm Sewer $370,800.00 d. Fill (soil) $ 380.82. e. Crossings/Signs $ 1,260.00 $465,332.46 p x O d N F O c T o -_ v c e O A , R � � - . _ y PROPOSED IIC ®HOUSING S I STS`-.N C E AREASY--w• FY WAFM rj IL :3 CAo yE .;.x-��'"- r `i '1' 1. •� �__.�= ��'ii'�_ L�L� �1_.,.-..J e 1- 1, ��, /a�� •�'q� — �}, / (; • '.�' 10 } CONCENTRATION F+ t O IT� S�B'1j"�`, N-SUS`:=T T "i ��. all- O _ 7;+-• .1 _ _ LLI1• ttr at^ •I Dao• a Chican s .' - .TRACT 307 �.�_ _a..:,._ � 221 10.1 WrIji. 1uL �' _ Zig u• 0006308 (45) �' ~ loll lie [SIDr ' 309 (1 i `C[N 304 :Or fr ,.[;7.. )oa` •a209 G` roC-� T. •:. tai - _ �r+ ( - IOv rw 171st 208 ]0) / OS > - `104 .!� L6 . �—__� {)) ji�i1 ....� ♦ 3• [SYS _ at �Z�t(^.'.,`. - �� - - „ • .l {� • 7• raf ft all Ile 12? u ! Ns• • ' =. :•�• ION 'D;}��, N� f'- ICs, / �.r{'r''- - ` •- . 11/ Il/ 11! ■ 136 120 1. Ica fy� •^:S_�� _ 'P"- < � ' 120 _ lr)•' Y �_ •:. __ C: }� /..-'':; .'•• ' � _ - z- f� Y Ill IN Ii/ UI . 1!! l01• .•� .3• .._�_: - _ _..-;y-' � fir:. •. �~ , ,i•-, uc—�? - ^ N a. .•cc IJf 136, • '• �+; ��,�lJ� Div• �. )6•, 1� •• H �-' • 1)le I? :~'} - •�)_ f• • 1 -�'� �� .,> •c•f — ar :c, q ur132 1" 9��i s;_� �. 1 `:,i ; • ?''' rw loll �r�i \• .r r•: �10 ...• t+[.-i. )) `� -Lir, - r sJ .J/6 - :w l s• ♦ Iz! 10!• Vii: .ca; • yu�_Ati �:.,_ load tc`.`;:.}::-af. � !G"i..• •yr f6!, � 4'�!, �,71 -a 3• ,ssse o-$'•' �!�'.' • L[.. - -1124 �kh„} r .��?�>J`'':'^7p-"_' l:s• �1.i•'•t •\�\a o r"'. � ] Y :. ..•'' a rr1•�`•i. 'r _Sl. ;_ '=„ti '-o.- t� -•••1 t1 c% -- ],� • 1 (jKi• Lir A` •lar.' ` a 1Lf• `rt:��3�:' 'i-1•'. •r.! L- • Itsti, = - its ,/�� J`1.:r � lo)• . .,.{.L: 129 6 .�a ��_Ti•J-S;i�,+?��- I:a• + fs�•a ,_., �• �? ,3 ,-. ,�1)Di1t��, -i F l -� .':._:. ':-tea :: • '!` ��`'_� _Cu �• '•� 119 T) ria • y �� .Y•1�^- h4 ?` ?•, i %Y-` �:' w :. Jyy ,� ./.yam o 1:-- \'F_•i ■• .Jo L i.X-•.3•'• a I)o Vr' - j•i; `; -- y-IC:-IJ b- 1�.�_ 11)•� _•'•.b �T•.`I`-- 'i '�'�� `Lti� \�♦ - ft ' •. Cil'SI R _La`: ^r 111 ! w» • +�� . .._ ) ]7 L•1 is J ' i p�� _n (or•�i .��`t]L• j-�_ j: - • 1:/• )) ti=•il.:'• / _ IOL9c.39 106 * -. t n�u•• - ..it - ro 1]ft r7a` l.-`-' 1 •/ ^. ao r • .r�_..� 1 1�. ' p_ 1 _ I•+Di fes` aof� 4r •) 1 ~'� 3.•-TSt XIL 10-111 103• _ _y= JO!•. L• - 3 f; �)} ) _ rOf• 7090 �__ ��• _i44 r -••. A al: 1 ._`YC!_ L^_-n.— R -•.-t�'.•' � ---_ - .. los• •O/ !•� >►";709• f°t:3,a GJ - • • y -_ �" _ Zia- is 1a• •a• :. [r' • 0104 .O�•!,• 110•L - F" ]M ?' o., d - Pop • r�• •/ • 709• Z •J \La � .•�! 8 Syl - 4.:-' • C.Sr yD. f/ T]I¢7 / • �]Ca•� �; • 410''ltf3 s'-^Y.-f_ .z^'.ai' / ��l.f_��: t)N J)/ .ro• • A•d • 1� :• 3140 to/ _ _ •' ^ Sl b .1• - , 309 1 ff+�► 7100 i� 1 ' � --! 10lot :• - '�31 � `R•J` _. •.K�-.^. ._ f[._-._ •I��"j?;��! �Ol• Ct-'�(a� ��_. •_: T]IJ• % ` �`� -�� 3»• tt t F 9 v�: � .S• a•�.t•1 tea.! fr :t• :sY' :-- ) i'_� •3r _3\. �--- 1 ls_ 1 -f. :' • a .-.{ •Nl.. { i ws.:.�. _- r:�l. .c (' s,-• '� 1 .-. E 91 is f�—� �••. �j.4 / _ - lV�- � •',�-s`4e[ _ i . � ��r�s l � > ; -1' ' i -f /• • •�} • •" �� _ - 7310 ': �:�; !." •ES*v. i' _ -1 _ I'� '> - _ - r� ''( ` IDI• tis •.10� .<•' o_ .ol - aa• •� Jimp 14, :Y . --.m' T` :R. �. .:`J --� /•�o�- y syn a SLs-ani--_. • -3A- . 2B The following program is proposed to comply with the Housing Assistance portion of the HCD application. The location for new housing construction is identified on the attached vicinity map. The criteria used for selecting these areas was based on the extent of substandard housing, the extent of poverty and the amount of elderly. people within the community. There is no recog- nized high percent of concentration of minority groups within any of the five (5) census tracts that are within the Tigard City limits.* Census Tract Chicanos . 307 68 308 45 309 18 319 30. T,d; A I (All census tracts combined: Blacks 7 Indians 7 Asians 2,3 I v tom( r+l,, .io-t ceJ �a Q( Cc k.,t.< k Area 1 A. General Location Census Tracts 308 and 319 1. To be constructed approximately 30 multi-family .units. B. Criteria 1. Proposed location for construction of housing units is within close proximity to senior citizens center. 2. The project site development will be in conformance with zoning in the area. 3. Mass transportation and shopping facilities will be within walking distance of proposed project site. Area 2 ' A. General Location Census Tracts 309 and 319 1. To be consptructed--approximately 10 single family units. tlwLd, v`i-,c.-�a,{� a ,wo.t,. �%"r i,L,•ta..t.kA., B. Criteria 1. Prevention of deterioration a: The��lnfuSion of new con�ructon in he .neighbor ood ward'- % tend\to reduce the d leterious effect on-vacant 1 �n the arVaand . sery e to- revent the decline decay of isting_� --housing-stock,....---- _- -:—_ _.- ------ - _ --- 2. The availability of public services to include bus line City. of Tigard Tigard, Oregon -3B- and shopping center close to proposed development site. 3. Availability of existing services, . i.e. sanitary sewer lines. _ YY ---_\---- � to theme . -area. aCdisThe ams�n 'vacant availa ccc ve �opos site ��.--- P- - Private developers, financial institutions and the fld�is-ing Authority o `�1r,as ington County wile be contacted egarding the p ysical>'imple- �mentati n of housing pro jects.;rl,. -Negotiat�" ons /concernin the'housing--.pro- f sects wi transpire durin , the first mons of the fire action year with actua construction along place i�r the latter pa f the first funding yea . , "to be fo - owed ��'n subseR� ent �Vnding ye,,rs b ed on housing needs tas st blish da-`in the c2preh nsive hod ing stock sure Viand addit- ionallications- for housing fr,Q the Housin �Authoaty. -ef'�i,Tashington Y - C"::"L.` vu-4 qu.._76- / - ie'G� A'd V- t, Avu kil-Ii%A.t;>ar 1 14iv�f1C•1.,.T t r t, 1. ��rl. C �B��Gt?�'Ci[:etl:�, t�tn �i '�' GLS` i1:3' ' C�ie.✓�Q�a *Data' Source (1) 1970 4th Count Census (f 1970 Census Tract Characteristics of. Housing Units and Population by Blocks 1970 (3) Housing Authority of Washington County , 4 Portland State University Centerfor Population .Research and Census City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon -4= - 3 The benefits which will be provided the community by receipt of the requested grant money are readily evident by examining the objectives this program is designed* to accom- plish. Within a community which is nearly totally dependent upon the automobile for transport, this project will provide a secondary means of transportation by foot and bicycle which 'is inexpensive, safe, healthful, available to persons not capable of operating an automobile and with links .be-. +.•ween major origins and destinations. ' . In addition to pro- viding the basic purpose of safe routes for the pedestrian and bicyclist,, there are many recreational benefits to be realized. Not only will the proposed routes accomplish, identified community needs by .connecting areas of higher. density, lower cost housing and access to recreational opportunities, but the routes themselves will become recreational facilities for persons who enjoy walking, jogging and bicycling as a form of recreation itself. 4 Tigard is a young city, chartered in 1961_, that has grown tenfold in population and threefold in area in the last decade. Evidence of Tigard's growth rate, and the kind of growth we are currently experiencing, can be found in the fact that for 1975 we averaged 2.5 million dollars per. month in value of building permits issued. With such rapid growth Tigard's street system, a system designed to fulfill the . needs of a rural community, not an urban place, is deficient in providing for a safe and efficient movement of vehicular traffic. Safety to pedestrian and bicycle oriented traffic is compounded by the deficiencies in the existing street system. To provide for the pedestrian/bicycle needs of the community and avoid the hazardous conditions that now exist on Tigard' s streets, the construction of a :primary pedestrian bike path system meeting the pressing existent needs, while offering the nucleus for an expanded system, is explicitly apparent. City of Tigard Tigard, Oregon i s STAFF REPORT - A-95 Review/763-30 Columbia Region Association of Governments March 3, 1976 APPLICANT AGENCY: City of Tigard FUNDING AGENCY: Dept. of Housing and' Urban Development Community Development Block Grant - Metropolitan Discretionary Balance PRE-APPLICATION DEADLINE:. . March 15, 1976 PROJECT COST: $470, 386 . 46 Federal: $470,386. 46 Local: None Other: None Project Location City of Tigard Project Description The pre-application is for federal assistance under HUD' s Community .- Development Block Grant Program to fund a pedestrian safety-oriented system of bikeways and walkways throughout the City of Tigard. - Eight pedestrian/bike path segments are submitted totalling approximately 5. 8 miles in length. , Cost factors include grading/clearing and grubbing rock and Class C mix (asphalt) , storm sewer,. fill. (soil) and crossings/ signs. Staff Observations and Comments 1. CRAG' s Preliminary Regional Framewdrk Plan identifies the City of Tigard and immediate vicinity as Urban. 2.. The bike paths described in the . pre-application appear to be consis- tent with regional routes described in CRAG's 1979 ,draft: "A Bikewa Plan for the .Columbia-Willamette Region. ". Staff Recommendation From an areawide clearinghouse standpoint, the project appears to be consistent with or appears to contribute to the fulfillment of on-going regional and local comprehensive planning programs. CRAG:, therefore, recommends to HUD that the City of Tigard be invited to apply. for final application. OREGON r-'10JECT NOTIFICATION AND REVIEW. SYSTEM STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Intergovernmental Relations Division 240 Cottage Street S..E. , Salem, Oregon 97310 Leslie Lehmann, Coordinator . Ph: 378-3732 STATE A-95 REVIEW CONCLUSIONS C�. � X915 City of Tigard �Y n� �16AA-PL I CANT ---- C� PROJECT TITLE ; Community Development DATE: March 9, 1976 The state has reviewed your project and reached the following conclusions: RX No significant conflict with the plans, policies .. or programs of state government have been identified FRelevant comments of state agencies are attached xlx and should be considered in the final design of your proposal. aPotential conflicts with the plans and programs of the state agency (s) have been satisfactorily resolved. No significant issues remain. ❑ Significant conflicts with the plans, policies or programs of state government have been identified and remain unresolved. The final proposal has been reviewed and the final comments and recommendations of the state are attached. NOTICE TO FEDERALiAGENCY The following is the officially assigned State Identifier Number: 7602 2 570 This number- should be used on_ al.l correspondence and particularly on SF 240 as required by OMB A-98. A copy of this notification and attachments, if any, must accompany your application to the federal agency as required by OMB A-95. Comments .of the .appropriate local reviewing agencies must also be included. PNRS#►2 f WIREGON PROJECT HOTIRCATION AND RIA 111N SYSTFA; STATE CLEARIN JSE Intergovernmental�Relations IV on • yF�;l/o ,�,c 240 Cottage Street S.E. , Salem; Oregon 97310 Leslie Lehmann, Coordinator Phone: 378-3732 �9? PNRS S I AJ-E. R E V I E Project # : 7602 2 570. Due Dater LIAR 0 5 197 To Agency Addressed: If you intend to comment but cannot respond by the return date, please notify us immediately. If no response is received_ by the due date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the file will be closed. PROGRAM REVIEW AND COMMENT To State Clearinghouse: We have reviewed the subject Notice and have reached the following conclusions on its relationship to our plans and programs: ( ) It has no adverse effect. ( ) We have no comment. ( ) Effects, although measurable, would be acceptable.. ( ) It has adverse effects. ( ) We are interested but- require more information to evaluate 't1w. proposal. ( ) Please coordinate the implementation of the proposal with us. (L."�Additior_al comments for project imprbvement. (Attach if necessary) REMARKS (Please type or print legibly) If the project would-require the removal or fill of 50 cubic yards or more of material below the bank of the waterway(s) ,. we urge .the appli- cant to apply for state fill or removal permits well in advance of con- \` struction deadlines to prevent unnecessary ,project delays. Specific information on the need.for permits 'may be obtained from the Division of State Lands° •office at 1445 State Street, Salem, Oregon 97310. Phone- 378-3805. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. AgencyBy �Q.-tL - T :1 !V T9014- AN -42V SYMEM OREGON P 91113CA J. STAFF CLURIMMUSSE OTATE HWY� EtJGS' ' r� Intergovernmental4Relations t5i"vision v Ir FEB 2 0'7624 Cottage Street S.E. , Salem, Oregon 97310 , A� ie Lehmann., Coordinator. Phone: 378--3732 -9, REFER TO FOR P N R S S . . A LE .. REV 'I E 7602 2 0MARn .9197 Tr Due Date: T&-Agency-Addressed: If you intend to comment but cannot respond by the return date, please notify us immediately. If no response is received by the due date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the file will be closed. PROGRAM REVIEW AND COMMENT To State Clearin hg ouusse: We have reviewed the subject Notice and have reached the following conclusions on its relationship to our- plans and programs: O It has no adverse effect. ( ) We. have no comment. ( ) Effects, although measurable, would be acceptable. ( ) it has adverse effects. ( ) We are interested but require more information to' evaluate -thg. proposal. O Please coordinate the implementation of the proposal with us. ,' . ( ) Additional coTmmerts for project improvement. (Attach if necessary) REMARKS (Please type or print legibly) DISTRICT 2-. FEB 2 71976 ADE DOM Agency G By i v .. J o r STATE C!EAIN 'r; US E 4�, Intergovernmental`Relations DI-vision vE jy 240 Cottage Street S.E. , Salem, Oregon 97310 Leslie Lehmann, Coordinator Phone: 378-3732 1�;7 P -M RSA � S T REVIEW nnp Q Project # : I 6U, Due Date: MAR 0 5) 197 6 To Agency Addressed: I£ you intend to. comment but cannot respond by the return date, please notify us immediately. If no response -is received by the due date, it will be assumed that you have no comment and the file will be closed. - PROGRAM REVIEW AND COMMENT To State Clearinghouse: We have reviewed the subject Notice and have reached the following conclusions on its relationship to our plans and programs: ( ) It has no adverse effect. ( ) We have no comment. ( x) Effects, although measurable, would be acceptable. ( ) It has adverse effects. - + ( ) We are interested but require more information to evaluate -thq,. proposal. ( ) Please coordinate the implementation of the proposal with us . { ) Additional comments for project improvement. (Attach. if necessary) REMARKS (Please type or print legibly) The construction of additional storm sewers will have some effects on area streams by allowing additional turbid waters to enter during . periods of runoff. Agency ��lh B i.. • 3el 76 ENVIRONMENTAL HANAGEMENT :CT ION *VJEW SYR STATE CLEA, I NGMUSE DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION Intergovernmental`Relations 13"ivi sion AND DFVFi,nonny NT 240 Cottage :Street S.E. , Salen, Oregon 97310 $ 0 1976 _. = Leslie Lehmann, Coordinator Phone: 378--3732 . r ,, P N R S S -R E V I E W SALEM Project # : 760 2 2 570 Due Date: MAR O 1976 To Agency Addressed: If you intend to comment but. cannot .respond by the, return date, , please notify us immediately. If no response is received by the due date, it will be assumed that you .have no comment and the file will be closed. PROGRAM REVIEW AND COMMENT, To State Clearinghouse: We have reviewed the subject Notice and .have reached the following conclusions .on its relationship to our plans and programs: ( ) It has no adverse effect. ( ) We have no comment. ( ) Effects, although measurable, would be acceptable. _ ( ) It has adverse effects. ( ) We are interested but require more information to evaluate •t"-. proposal. ( ) Please coordinate the implementation of the proposal with us. � x ) Additional comments for project improvement. (Attach if necessary) RE1 ARKS (Please type or print legibly) This project should be closely coordinated with the city's current efforts of revising the comprehensive plan with the LCDC goals, particularly Goal 10: Housing and Goal 12 : Transportation Agency ��t l�' By #tom r COLUMBIA REGION ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS CRAB 527 S.W. HALL STREET PORTLAND, OREGON 97201 = (503) 221-1646 4 AR n 1g75 March 4, 1976 111TY OF TIGARD LARRY RICE,EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REGULAR MEMBERS CLACKAMAS COUNTY Mr. Bruce Clark, City,. Administrator Barlow Canby City of Tigard Estacada 12420 S.W. Main Street Gladstone Happy Valley Tigard, Oregon 97223 Johnson City Lake Oswego Milwaukie RE: City of Tigard Oregoan City Community Development Block Grant, Orego Rivergrove Metropolitan Discretionary Balance Sandy PNRS # : Not Available West Linn Wilsonville MULTNOMAH COUNTY Fairview Gresham Dear Mr. Clark: Maywood Park Portland At its regular meeting of March 3, 1976, CRAG' s Wood Village Community Development Technical Advisory Committee WASHINGTON COUNTY (CDTAC) reviewed Tigard' s preapplication for Community Banks Development Block Grant funding for FY 1976 to fund Beaverton a pedestrian/bike path. Following discussion on the Durhalms matter, wherein the proposed project was found to be Forest Grove consistent with or could contribute to .the fulfillment Gaston Hillsboro of on-going regional and local comprehensive planning King city programs, the committee voted to recommend to the North Plains Sherwood' Department of Housing and Urban Development that the Tigard City of Tigard be invited to apply for final application. Tualatin ASSOCIATE MEMBERS Please be advised that the late ate s_Ubmis ion CLARK COUNTY of the preapplication to HUD s� arch 15, 1976. n Vancouver Washougal addition, copies of any comm nts received fr RAG must be included with the prea Columbia City Scappoose St.Helens Due to substantial changes in regulations governing the The Port of Portland Tri-Met submission of housing assistance plans as part of The State of Oregon applications for grants, enclosed is a copy of the January 15, 1976 issue of the Federal Register which pertains to Housing Assistance Plans. Also enclosed, for your convenience, is a copy of the Staff Report pertaining to the preapplication. Cordially yours, Larry Rice Executive Director LR:nf 4 :13 Enclosures : 2 PUBLI'G ,SANI'1 ARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED WITHINS.W. MURDOCK STREET LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AND AUTHORIZING R.EI.,EASE OF THE MAIN`1'.EiNANCE BOND THEREFOR. (a) City Adtministratpr recomn�end:ed approval., (b) Motion to adopt: Councilman. Ba-rkhurst, seconded by Councilman Mickelson., Approved by unanimous. vote of Council present. 14. GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER INFILTRATION/INFLOW CONTROL (a) City Administrator recommended Council adopt specifications and authorize call for bids. He suggested that bids be open at City Hall, Friday;,. MArch l9, 1976 at 3 P.M. He stated staff would review and make re'commendation at March 22nd Council meeting. (b) Mgtion to adopt: specifications and authorize call for bids to be opened at .City ball, Friday, Kaxrch !J9, 1976- at 3 P.M.: Councilman Moore, seconded by Cquhciltagn Mickelson, Approved by unanimous vote of Council present. 15. PUBLIC HEARING 8;0& P.M. (a), Hearing to discuss Tigard's community needs as a basis for ,applying f?o�p monies under the Department of Housing and Urban Development Block Granit Program. (1) Public Hearing Opened (2) Opening Remarks City Administrator briefly outlined the process leading to establishment of priorities and the contents of the application. L Public Comment and Input None Hearing Closed Discussion by Cogncil ionto authorize staff to re-sublrit application;onded by Counctlmap Mickelson, roved by unanimous vote of Council present. 16. NPO #3 COMMUNICATION TO COUNCIL, Regarding NPO #3 Plan (a). Due to: an error, the. Council did not receive cop.i,es of the minutes of the .NPO '#� m�etl.rlg. Counc.tt regpested copies of the minutes be. mailed to tk etn and that s:�Af f reschedule matter. for March 1:s t s t:.ldy session. PAGE 4 —COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 23a 076 OREGON P1 _JECT NOTIFICATION A[ REVIEW SYSTEM Aim STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Intergovernmental Relations Division 240. Cottage Street S.E. , Salem, Oregon 97310 Leslie Lehmann', Coordinator Phone: 378-3732 EIVED FEB z u 1975 PROJECT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CITY OF: TIGAMPLICANT: city of Tigard PROJECT TITLE: Community- Development DATE RECEIVED: February 17.1976 PNRS #: 7602 2 570 'Your project has been assigned the file title and number that appear above. Use. this reference in all future correspondence regarding this project. Initial 30-day State Clearinghouse review of your Notice Fxxl of Intent began on the above date. ❑ The 30-day State Clearinghouse review of your final application began on the above date. Initial 307day State Clearinghouse review of this HUD Housing project began on the above date. Initial 30-day State Clearinghouse review of your Direct Federal Development project began .on the above date. The 30-day State Clearinghouse review of your final F-1 Environmental Impact Statement began on the above date. a Initial 45-day State Clearinghouse review of your draft Environmental Impact Statement began on the above date. The 45-day State Clearinghouse review of your State Plan/ F Amendment began on the above date. If you have questions or need assistance, contact the State Clear- inghouse at the above address and telephone number. :G.yrr�r: Dry ;dahl, Executive Director, Wester r Eny3 ron- mer al Trade Association, Inc. Mrs, McIntyrey 8863 S. Wg 'Commercial Street, Tigard Rober-.; Bailey (4) Bearing Closed COUNCIL RECESSED 9:05 COUNCIL RECONVENED 9:25 (b) Hearing to discuss Tlgord's Corpunity needs es a bi}si s for applying for monies urdor the Depsrtplo nt of Housing and Urban Developmep.t Block Grant Progrmp (1 ) PublA.c Hearing Apar®d (2) Opening Remarks City Adm1n14tr4tor rerAtnOoO gqunct� then mz^+pxi^ mately one year ago a Oer�ps of b�Q '} PaIP were held. to pstag;tah ftgPrW s prWOOD in terms of improvement octiyi't�.es ! Numbor one prprjty was providing the City with 'an adegi4ate ppdpstrien/ bicyple pathway ✓system. On the basto "Af t�pt input, the Staff submitted an pppl$ca�ticaM the I)ept. of Housing and Urban Aev6jopment for menigp toQnstruct pathw$ys which was Toot fyndod, 1140 qtv "c�m�ni,��trator f4rther pointed out that there are new p9o,.0 avail, able for a second mr of prooepts +fid hp rec?mmended that the City take thq oppgrtppn tY tp re-s4bMit the applioption, The proppaed a pl. cru qn v�A,t10 be essentially the same with Qn�y a few revipi.ons and modifications. (3) Public Comment and Input i. Mrs. McIntyre, Council. and Staff discusW funding of application, (4) Hearing Closed (5) DIsoussion by Council. Counoil and staff discussed the prpppaed application. Council requested Staff check the oatus of the Durham Read Pathway witb the Tualati,n Dpvelopment Corp in re4grds to the completion of that Project and to report findings to Copnct, ., Motion, to authorize Staff tQ reg-s4pMit application: Councilman Cook* sec+pnded by Coµnci lgeri Moore, PAGE 3 COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 90 1970 i L •:`' '' .:�x�r.x.�.m5:��.� ll •arc 'e o:t Council. present �� 1 ��T�, f�i�i.t.7.!3�.�: `:\:•.� di.�v;L'.l�l�d'1.L:2i.i A reque-st by City o.f. Tigard to amend sections , 18.20,02P 18.20.030, and 18.204040 of the Tigard Municipal Code to increase the minimum lot si7,:es required in res dgntiQl zones for duplex and two .family use from 8.,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet ( 1 ) Public hearing Opened Statement of facts by Planning Director (2) Public Testimony -, None Cross Examination T None (3) Planning Director recommended changing the previous required minimum lot sizes in res�,dgnii�al zp�es For duplex and two family use sxld the. deletion of duplex residences as a conditional use In the R,.30' 'zone. (4) Consideration by Council (5) ORDINANCE NO. 1475AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TIGARD MUNICIPAL CODE,_ CHAPTER 18,20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES., TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIRED FOR A DUPLEX TN THE R-7 ZONE FROM 89000 TO '10 000 SQUARE FEET AND TO 'DECREASE THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE FROM 35 PERCENT TO 25 PERCENT AND DELETE DUPLEX RESIDENCES AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE R-30 ZONE PRESCRIBING AN EFFECTIVE DATE-' A D DECLARING AN EMEhGENC`t'P Council discussed -the title of -the ordinance with staff and felt it should be amended to reflect the full intention of the ordinance, Motion to adapt Orojnance No, 76- 5: Covtncil an Cook,, seconded by Councilman Mickelson. Motion to amend Ordinance No. 76 -5 by inserting the words R-15 ZONE after and. fourth line down: Cotmcilman Cook, seconded by dounciimar� Mickelson, Approved amendment to Ordinance No, 76 -5 by unantmous vote of Council present, PAGE 4 COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 9, 1976 AFFIDAVIT % ,-,UBLICATION - e STATE-OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, ss. I, - - c7919.0p5 4 I"----- -—- - —----------------------------------- CITY OF TIGARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher Notice is hereby given that a public' bearing will be held by the City Council ________- of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined R New Fowler ,Tumor High Lecture ----------- ooifr,10865 S.W.Walnut,Tigard,Ore- t�jori February 23, 1976 at 8:00 P.M. by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and with respect to the following: The Tigard City Council-is request-! state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was ing your attendance and input to+ discuss Tigard's Community Needs asi 1 a basis for applying for Housing and,' published is the entire issue of said newspaper for _____ _.____ _______ successive and _ _ Community Development Grant, consecutive weeks in the following issues ____-.____—_____________-___—_.________— monies for 1976, through the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Develop- Fe — mrua 22� 1976- eat.---------_----� All interested persons may appear, and be beard in favor of of against the: -- ( gna re) —- — -said matters. BY ORDER OF' THE CITY COUNCIL'. Subscribed and sworn to before me this _..___-_._26th _ Doris Hartig -_ day of _____-_-__ .City Recorderl (TT4M2 — Publish Feb,22,1976) February...... o��tffaryOregon My commission expires AFFIDAVIT OF eUBLICATION f STATE OF OREGON, I CITY OF TIGARD SS. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, J Notice is hereby ven that a public shearing will beheld the City CY091cil lat New wler Junior High rd h - --- - --- -----d�sepb---S Choi f e x ---— *00m, $w walfi t,Tigata - gon on February �, 19•rs•ar•8#0o p being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the publisher _ I'with respect to_the'fs)llowioll The ity tenoairci ------------------------ of The Tigard Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined dig s§Ti atd s,QhVnup Y' o asr a basis for apgl�ing,fOj.l�los+sipg and` by ORS 193.010 and 193.020, published at Tigard, in the aforesaid county and Community -DeveloprQent Crane monies for 19'76,thro1hrthe rt: state; that the legal notice, a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was meat of 1<Iaus%ag and;Urban i�veldp-',; ment. The Tigard City Cduneft is-, tin published in the entire issue of said newspaper for _ _—.__—_ successive and I . g citizens of tt(e_sQuth`est'Pot.Uo4_of consecutive weeks in the followingPortland Me)sopa. the Area the d, issues -----------------------------------------___-- �tunity.to express their t gni concerns relative-to.the C;ftXG. — --- ------- -- February-19L.. --- --- -—- -- posal to adopt by.Maw 2 of the Regional Land t 3e oali+&Ob='! jectivGs and Fram&WCtk fjd6&rule!` imple editing,.both pry:, All interested'pers va_roaY apP ; and be,heard in favor of.or against the Subscribed and sworn to before me this _-------.12th day of __ - said matters.'- BY atters.•BY ORDER OF THE CITY CUUNCM, February_ 19_ 76 ` 26p7 — Rtblish February Hartig'I ------------ City Recorder;. ary 8, 1976)r., I --------- ------------- ----- - -------- — ----------------- Notary PuW of Oregon My commission expires 19- I 4.. A R D C i T V AC 0 U, N1 C i ROLL CALL: Pres en t-. _.Aa�Ny: r 1 j r A 3 s h o Ra.lph C. Bavkhurst, John E. Cook, Alar-E Nlickelson, Robert G. Moore; P,, B. Adams., Chief of Police; .Russel Austin., Building Official;: J. D. Bailey, Legal Counsel; Ric-Aard C. Bolen, Planning Director; Bruce P. Clark, City Administrator; Doris Hartig, City Recorder, 2. CALL TO AUDIENCE FOR THOSE DESIRING TO SPEAK ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS (a) None 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, January 12, 1976, regular meeting (a) Motion to approve-. Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Barkhurst. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Department Land Conservation & Development (a) . Motion to receive and file: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Barkhurst. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 5. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS $18,046.05 (a) Motion to approve: Councilman Cook, seconded by Councilman Barkhurst. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 6. MONTHLY REPORTS Administration Library Building Planning Finance Police (a) Motion to receive and file: Councilman Cook, secoride-d by Councilman Barkhurst. Approved by unanimous vote of Council. 7. SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS - February 9, 1976,bEginnir, at pm. }?ow ler r Junio r High School Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Amend section l(8.20 increasin-g, P-1 the minimium duplex lot size in R-7 zone A A meeting to discuss Tigard's community need's as a basis -for applying for SETTING Zoning du' monies under the Department of Housing and Urban Development Block Grant Program.rogram. C I C.R.A.G. Plan Hearing L)( Motion tc; set public. tiea-ringst Copne.Llman Cook, secovided by Councilman Rarkhur_t. Approved by ulnanimoub vote of Council..,ZE EXECUTION OF SAIITARY SEWER CONTRACT . George K, Heusber re4 Lot. 1, Ttppitt Place Subdivision (a) City Administrator synopsized sewer oontraet an4 recommended approval.. (b) Motion by CounctImap Qook to apcapt aid �uthortxe e?�ecuttpn by Mayor and City Recorder; secrandgd by Ctaµnp: tMAn MtpX4e sonf Approved by 4nanifnpus vote? of QpUnatj, 9. AUTHORIZE EXECUTION QF SANITARY S7rWj~ li40AM�NT ANT) $TPRI N $,91WAR 'EASEMENT Way Lee (69th Avenue), (a) City Administratpr red PmTendpd QPi;n0l aGcapt both sonitary sower and storm sewer eAsemonts and 41409T40 aA 4ptign, (b) lotion to accept both sasOMAPt# APO 44th4rl.aa OK4PgtiPl by MaYQV qnd City Recorder on behalf of the qty.' Approved by unanimous vete of Cpp?%eil„ 10. ORDINANCE No. 76r3 AN QRAjNANCS ESTAB4j$HjN0 THE 'f�QARQ CTTY COUNrIL AS THE LQQAL CONTAACT REVIEW ApARD FOR THE PITY OF TIGARAp FIXING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; I)ECLARTNG AN >iMERGENCY, (a) Attorney Bal�ey gpopsl,ae?d O,R.S* which went tr%ta pffent 4a}tivary 10 1976 And stated the proposed ordInaence Wquld apFgipt the Qjty Council as local contract xpview board aq wel1' a$ moe� S�Bte a3eluixarnant � (b) rbtion to adopt; Counri.lMan Mfe►sogl,son, seconded by Councilman Cook, Approved by un4nl.mous vote of CouAo i l, 11. PRESENTA2FTON OF RE-PAC PLAN (a) Planning Director synopsized RETP,AC, Activities since l.a$t September and discussed proposed landscape pls.n. Chuck McClur(}, from audience, representing RE^PAC, diaicgssed the financing plan, and stated $2,733.0() had been pledged to the project, Total cost: .for tqateria`l 'is esti-mated to be $3,000.00, Pity AdmiAlptrAtgr stated if Councit adopted the pxoposed resolution the City staff could start: wexlc in. February. (b) RESOLUTION No, 76-16 RESO3 UTTON Or THE TIGARD CITY COUNCI,I. CQMMITTIN(; THE WISTANCA OF THE TICARD PUBLIC WORKS DEPABI'M1.N AND THE TT4AR0 PLANNINQ DgPART144NT TOWARD CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAIN STRF,ET BEAUTTFICATION DEMONSTR.A.TIOV PROJEQT AS FRIQPOSED BY RE,,PA.C. Motion to adopt; Covnci.lman Mickelson, seconded by Councilman BaTkhgr,s t, Approved by unanimous vAte of Copgci.l, PAGE 2 R COUNCIL MINUTES , ,IANU�RY 2§p j 976 I