Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet - 08/12/2025 • CFTYOF Tigard Business Meeting 11T Tigard AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD &TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE AND TIME: AUGUST 12, 2025 - 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid - City of Tigard -Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with Oregon House Bill 2560, this will be a hybrid meeting where some Council, staff or public will participate in person and some will participate remotely. How to comment: • Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments by noon the day before the meeting date. • If attending the meeting in person, please fill out the public comment sign-in sheet at the front of the room and come to the microphone when your name is called. • If you prefer to call in, please call 503-966-4101 when instructed to be placed in the queue. We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to two minutes. •You may comment by video through the Teams app. Go to this link to learn how to participate by video: August 12, 2025 Council Meeting (https://www.tigard-or.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/9927/372). Upon request, the City will endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments; and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers, it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by contacting: City Recorder Carol Krager at 503-718-2419 (voice) /carolk@tigard-or.gov or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM ONLINE: https://www.tigard-or.gov/boxcast CABLE VIEWERS: The City Council meeting will be shown live on Channel 21 (1st Tuesdays) and Channel 28 (2nd &4th Tuesdays) at 6:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Saturday 7:30 p.m. Sunday 11:30 a.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. CITYOF Tigard Business Meeting Tigard AGENDA TIGARD CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD &TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DATE AND TIME: AUGUST 12, 2025 - 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid - City of Tigard -Town Hall - 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITION 6:35 p.m. estimated time A. CITY HALL SELFIE DAY 3. CITY MANAGER REPORT 6:45 p.m. estimated time 4. PUBLIC COMMENT 6:55 p.m. estimated time A. Public Comment—Written B. Public Comment— In Person C. Public Comment— Phone-In D. Public Comment—Video 5 CONSENT AGENDA: (Local Contract Review Board and Town Center Development Agency) The Consent Agenda is used for routine items including approval of meeting minutes, contracts or intergovernmental agreements. Information on each item is available on the city's website in the packet for this meeting. These items may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Council members may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. 7:00 p.m. estimated time A. LIBRARY ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT- INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR B. RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES C. ON-CALL SPECIALTY LEGAL SERVICES CONTRACT AMENDMENT D. TCDA: AMEND EXPIRATION DATE OF DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT E. TCDA BOARD CONSIDERATION OF A MINOR AMENDMENT TO THE TIGARD TRIANGLE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN • Consent Agenda - Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion, 6. LEGISLATIVE SESSION RECAP 7:05 p.m. estimated time 7. NATIONAL COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS 7:35 p.m. estimated time 8. BRIEFING ON SAFE STREETS FOR ALL (SS4A) ACTION PLAN 8:05 p.m. estimated time 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order, the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute. All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 11. ADJOURNMENT8:35 p.m. estimated time AIS-5924 2. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: City Hall Selfie Day Proclamation Authored By: Rebecca Hathaway Presented By: City Manager Stockwell Item Type: Proclamation Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE City Hall Selfie Day, organized by Engaging Local Government Leaders (ELGL), is an annual event held to celebrate public service and showcase pride in local government institutions. It encourages people to take selfies in front of city halls, libraries, or other local government buildings and share them on social media using the hashtag#CityHallSelfie. ACTION REQUESTED City Manager Stockwell has requested that the Mayor issue a proclamation for City Hall Selfie Day. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations This is the first time the City of Tigard has issued this proclamation. Public Involvement Members of the public and employees are encouraged to share their selfies using the hashtag #CityHallSelfie. Impacts (Community, Budget, Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) The event aims to foster a sense of community and appreciation for the work done by local governments. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION N/A ADDITIONAL RESOURCES https://elgl.org/cityhallselfie/ Attachments City Hall Selfie Day Proclamation T: 4 K r- 1r, r 4-4. 'a, ' 3r , .,I •• 'iv 'k • y. 1 i' 1. a."- •`. e� 4 , Y. ..),....--, 1r\ /__~ q1:(). c o '!,tiara, V n 1 _. .,, •:t„.„.,1 . 1 , Gn•ofll�ud { . CITY HALL SELFIE DAY t. AUGUST 12, 2025 *- ' tit. f-" , WHEREAS,City Hall Selfie Day is a celebration of public service and civic pride, ' ;Y i. showcasing the vital role of local government in our daily lives,and r.ft • WHEREAS,this annual event,now celebrating its 10th anniversary,has engaged public , . •. servants and community members since its founding in 2016;and 4 WHEREAS,City Hall Selfie Day is organized by Engaging Local Government Leaders 'i) •• (ELGL),a professional association committed to supporting and connecting people who 1`�' work in and with local government,and i,� A _ WHEREAS,participants are encouraged to take selfies in front of city halls and government ‘� (i - ' buildings to highlight the accessibility and importance of local government;and -7� .: ,, WHEREAS,the use of the hashtag#CityHallSelfie and tagging ELGL on social media :• /• -� handles allows communities to connect,inspire civic engagement.and promote `' f ` �' transparency and public trust;and \,--,. ;. c i Ti _ WHEREAS,we encourage all members of our community to participate in this fun and :.`,. 'I. meaningful celebration by taking part in City Hall Selfie Day and showing their appreciation ,t. r • for the work of local public servants y � NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that I, Heidi Lueb.Mayor of the City of Tigard do ,`t' ` hereby proclaim August 12,2025 as I iw.iiiit,ei: .} CITY HALL SELFIE DAY '' in the City of Tigard and encourage all residents employees and visitors to join in the•%.l f s4re►k, 4 celebraton if Dated this 12th day of August,2025 - + '. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of ! , s, " � z.,,- Tigard to be affixed " .' "' aT1 I Fyn(. . Heidi Lueb,Mayor City of Tigard ' R,. ). Attest: ~ ~r'; Carol A Krager,City Recorder 1 `` �� O f: ,,�' .. It ` � .. lir l , s A'-,•* S +� ;A•„ .' ` . rt - ----*-- 41 ,, ,..•. _.,. ,..._,,,,, CITY HALL Q l r._,.....„,„ 1111110111 A ,,., WO 4,..r :: SELFIE DAY wr-Iii.st,r,.. tt •.fir 08 .12 . 25 2 5 „.,-.,..-- :..„.... ., .ir - ......4041 f..., ,, r r � CITY OF '4V:itstr c-: is, Tigard 44 '�0,.. - . _ m' THANKYOU 1:....:BUILDING A BETTER 1 gTORS. TfGARD r LFG1SL Ar. .slit V I a I `e`: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.B - PUBLIC COMMENT DATE: August 12, 2025 (Limited to 2 minutes or less, please) This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record.The names and cities of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Please review the "Tigard City Council Protocol for Public Comment." NAME &CITY YOU LIVE IN TOPIC Please Print Name )761W/ I Nar 'fie CityVier{V C/ C/ iiy-e/ Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional:. If you want a response from staff, please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For ❑ Against ❑ Neutral ❑ Name E/i Zq / 14K-71/rre-z— City T 47N J Ci 5 I 1/1 C et V S Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff, please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For ❑ Against ❑ Neutral Li Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff, please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For L7 Against❑ Neutral LJ Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff, please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For 7 Against LJ Neutral L_ 1 , AIS-5863 5. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Library Roof Replacement Project - Installation Contractor Authored By: Rosie McGown Presented By: Assistant City Engineer Brennan Item Type: Motion Requested Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The purpose of this action is to approve the award of a contract to V&R Sheet Metal LLC dba V&R Roofing for the Tigard Library Roof Replacement as the installation contractor. ACTION REQUESTED It is recommended that the Tigard City Council, also serving as the Local Contract Review Board (LCRB), award a contract to V&R Sheet Metal LLC dba V&R Roofing for Tigard Library Roof Replacement in the amount of$738,186.00 and direct the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project Overview: The 2016 Facilities Condition Assessment identified the life span of the Thermoplastic Polyolefin (TPO) membrane roofing of the library to be 20 years. The roof was forecast to be replaced in 2020, but preventive maintenance measures have extended this forecast to Fiscal Year 2025-26. The TPO roof surface is a membrane-type surface and is prone to failure once the surface reaches the end of its service life. Any leaks could have catastrophic consequences to the contents of the building and building structure. A previous contract was approved by the LCRB to purchase approximately 90% of the roofing materials through an OMNIA agreement by July 1, 2025, to avoid a significant price increase. This contract is for the installation of the materials with construction expected to commence in late August and be substantially completed by the first week in October. Project Timeline: With the approval of this contract, the library's roof replacement project is expected to commence in late August and be substantially complete by the first week in October. The roof replacement work will occur simultaneously with the Library's HVAC upgrade project, which is expected to be completed by the end of the year. The roofing contractor will likely need to complete their work following final installation of the upgraded HVAC equipment due to roof modifications needed to facilitate the upgraded HVAC equipment installation. Strategic Vision: This project helps facilitate the Library's strategic plan by providing a library building that is an accessible and vibrant space, by maintaining the aging building to prevent damage to the building's structure and the library media within, thereby facilitating a comfortable and "leak-free" community-engaging environment within the Library. Procurement Process: The City issued an Invitation to Bid (ITB) for the project on July 2, 2025, with notice published in the Daily Journal of Commerce. The Engineer's estimate for the project was $1,052,500. Upon closing on July 17, 2025 at 2:00 pm, the City received five (5) bids from the following firms, with amount of bid: •V&R Sheet Metal LLC dba V&R Roofing- $738,186.00 •ABC Roofing, a Tecta America Co LLC - $928,242.00 • Fisher Construction Group Inc. - $966,400.00 • McDonald & Wetle - $1,009,715.00 • Griffith Roofing Co LLC- $1,259,566.00 The project team, including central contracting, has confirmed the company is authorized by the manufacturer to install the City pre-purchased roofing material to maintain warranty, completed responsibility determination reviews in accordance with ORS 279C.375, reviewed the bids for errors, and, after these reviews, determined that V&R Sheet Metal LLC dba V&R Roofing has submitted the lowest responsible bid. V&R Sheet Metal LLC dba V&R Roofing has no State of Oregon Construction Board violations and is not on the Bureau of Labor and Industries ineligible list. Accordingly, it is recommended that the City award the Tigard Library Roof Replacement contract to V&R Sheet Metal LLC dba V&R Roofing in the amount of$738,186.00. ALTERNATIVES& RECOMMENDATION The Tigard City Council, also serving as the Local Contract Review Board, may reject this contract award recommendation and direct staff to rescope and resolicit for the work. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES FY26 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan - Facilities Projects (project 91026 on page 2) City's ITB Page June 10, 2025 - LCRB Approval of purchase of Library Roof Replacement Materials Fiscal Impact Cost: $738,186 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: CIP 91026-Construction Additional Fiscal Notes: This installation contract, along with the previously approved purchase of the materials, are within the approved construction budget for the project. The contract is anticipated to be completed entirely within FY26.The project is funded by the General Fund and Facilities Internal Service Fund. Attachments No file(s)attached. AIS-5892 5. B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Services Authored By: Rosie McGown Presented By: Public Works Business Manager Barrett Item Type: Motion Requested Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The purpose of this action is to approve the award of a contract to VYM LLC dba GT Landscape Solutions for Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Services. ACTION REQUESTED It is recommended that the Tigard City Council, also serving as the Local Contract Review Board, award a contract to VYM LLC dba GT Landscape Solutions for Right of Way Landscape Maintenance Services in the amount of$570,000 and direct the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project Overview: The City's Street Maintenance division is, among many other duties, responsible for right-of-way maintenance at various locations throughout the city, including along Pacific Highway. This is done on collector and arterial streets that staff have identified as benefiting from the work. This work is also detailed in Tigard Municipal Code (TMC)15.20.020 (Street Maintenance Fee - Definitions). Work under this contract will include maintenance of planting strips, medians, and areas between sidewalks and property lines in an effort to prevent uncontrolled growth of weeds and other undesirable vegetation. Planter beds will be groomed a minimum of four times per year (more frequently in high traffic areas) to ensure they promote a safe, attractive, and fresh appearance. Mowing and edging of certain areas may also fall under this contract along with litter clean up in all areas. The program also provides environmental weed and pest control monitoring. Fertilization of turf and trees in various areas is also included. The contract will also contain special provisions to ensure any work performed in Water Quality Facilities with an identified Right-of-Way is done so safely, with no use of any fertilizer or chemicals, and that all weed control is hand pulled. Funding for this work is out of the Street Maintenance divisional budget by way of a transfer to the Gas Tax Fund from the Street Maintenance Fund. This is included in the approved FY26 budget. Project Timeline: This work is done on an annual basis with work throughout the year but heavy from Spring through early Fall. Work will begin upon execution of the contract. The contract is for one year with the option for up to 4 additional one-year periods. Strategic Vision: This work serves to enhance the walkable, healthy, and accessible experience for all of Tigard's community by ensuring our identified rights-of-way under this contract are safe for both traffic and pedestrians alike. As this program ensures that vegetative growth in these areas is to a safe level, visibility for drivers, bicyclist, and pedestrians is greatly improved. Procurement Process: The City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the work on January 15, 2025, with notice published in the Daily Journal of Commerce. Upon closing, the City received two (2) proposals from the following firms, with a proposal score out of a possible 300 points: • Cascadian Landscapers, Inc - 285 • GT Landscape Solutions - 279 A selection committee of three teammates from Public Works scored the proposals based on the following criteria, as outlined in the RFP: • Firm Qualifications & Project Team - 35% • Project Understanding &Approach - 25% • Project Management - 20% • Cost Proposal - 20% Cascadian Landscapers, Inc. received the highest score and was awarded a contract by the LCRB on April 1, 2025. The City worked with Cascadian Landscapes through July 2025 but determined it was in the best interest of the city to terminate the contract for convenience. The proposal received by GT Landscape Solutions was also highly scored and the City is confident they will be able to provide the services required under the agreement. The City and GT Landscape Solutions have reached an agreed upon final scope and price. The final negotiated contract total for the first year is $103,360.92, with options for up to four (4) annual renewals with a price escalator tied to the Consumer Price Index. The total contact is estimated not to exceed $570,000 over a possible five-year period. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The Local Contract Review Board may reject this contract award recommendation and direct staff to resolicit the work. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES RFP 2025-14 Right of Way Maintenance April 1, 2025 LCRB Prior Consideration Fiscal Impact Cost: $570,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: Gas Tax—Street Maintenance Division Additional Fiscal Notes: This work is budgeted in the Street Maintenance Division. Appropriate funds are contained in the FY26 budget. Funding comes via a transfer from the Street Maintenance Fund. Year 1 of the agreement is $103,360.92 with an option for an annual escalator tied to the Consumer Price Index—West.The contract is estimated not to exceed $570,000 over a possible 5-year period. Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-5925 5. C. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: On-Call Specialty Legal Services Contract Amendment Authored By: Rosie McGown Presented By: City Attorney Rihala Item Type: Motion Requested Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The purpose of this action is to approve an amendment to the On-Call Specialty Legal Services contract. ACTION REQUESTED It is recommended that the Tigard City Council, also serving as the Local Contract Review Board, award an amendment to the On-Call Specialty Legal Services contract with Cable Huston LLP in the amount of $100,000 and direct the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the amendment. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Contract Overview: Cable Huston provides legal services to the City such as real estate, condemnation and litigation, employment, and other specialty services as requested by the City Attorney. The services needed are generally not ongoing, but rather, are in response to specific projects or cases that may arise, such as a litigation matter. Procurement Process: In accordance with ORS 279A.025 and Tigard's Public Contracting Rules certain categories of public contracts are category exempt from a competitive bidding or proposal process. PCR 10.062 exempts legal services, with approval by the City Attorney. Under this rule, the City Attorney approved a one year contract for $50,000 with Cable Huston for On-Call Specialty Legal services in September 2020. While competitive solicitation is not required, Tigard's Public Contracting Rule 10.075(C) requires LCRB approval when aggregate amendments to a contract exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the original contract amount and when the amended contract amount exceeds $150,000 if the board finds it to be in the public interest to do so. •Amendment 1: The contract was extended through June 30, 2022. An additional $25,000 was added to cover the additional year. • Amendment 2: The contract was extended through June 30, 2024. An additional $50,000 was added to cover the additional two years. • Amendment 3: Extended the term of the contract to June 30, 2026. • Amendment 4: Current amendment to be approved by LRCB in accordance with Tigard's Public Contracting Rule 10.075(C). $100,000 is being requested for additional flexibility to allow the City to be responsive to urgent needs. The Contractor only charges for actual services incurred. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The Tigard City Council, also serving as the Local Contract Review Board, may reject this contract amendment award recommendation. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $100,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: Various Additional Fiscal Notes: Expenses associated with this contract are typically paid for out of the City Attorney's budget for legal fees. However, expenses may be paid for by individual departments depending on the specific needs as they arise. Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-5916 5. D. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: TCDA: Amend Expiration Date of Development Assistance Agreement Authored By: Sean Farrelly Presented By: Redevelopment Manager Farrelly Item Type: Motion Requested Resolution Town Center Development Agency Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Staff are asking the Board of the Town Center Development Agency to approve an amendment to the Development Assistance Agreement with AVA Tigard Development. The amendment would extend the expiration date of the agreement from December 31, 2024, to September 15, 2025. This would allow time for AVA Tigard Development to make final payment of$72,416 towards Systems Development Charges; the remainder of the previously approved $300,000 in development assistance. ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends approval of the resolution authorizing the new expiration date. BACKGROUND INFORMATION On May 23, 2023, the Board of the TCDA approved $300,000 in development assistance to AVA Tigard Development to address unanticipated site conditions (TCDA Resolution 23-03). Since then, AVA Tigard Development has worked to complete the building, finishing 22 upper-level apartments in summer 2024 and completing first floor commercial improvements in July 2025. In 2023-2024, AVA Tigard Development drew down $227,584 of assistance for sewer and water Systems Development Charges (SDC's) and fees. AVA Tigard Development deferred the balance of SDC's until the building received a final Certificate of Occupancy. On July 22, 2025, AVA Tigard Development paid $180,083 for SDC's and requested to use the remaining $72,416 in development assistance to pay the balance. Section 2.3 of the assistance agreement set an expiration date of December 31, 2024, which could be extended by the parties. In order to utilize the remaining assistance to pay for SDC's, the agreement is proposed to be extended until September 15, 2025. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION Failure to authorize the extension would prevent the TCDA from making the remaining payment. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $72,416 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department/program): TCDA/City Center Additional Fiscal Notes: The FY26 TCDA Budget includes $100,000 in development assistance in the City Center fund. Attachments TCDA Resolution -AVA Tigard Exhibit A: Agreement Amendment CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT WITH AVA TIGARD DEVELOPMENT, LLC. WHEREAS, the Tigard Town Center Development Agency approved a development assistance agreement with AVA Tigard Development, LLC on May 23, 2023 with Resolution 23-03;and WHEREAS, the agreement authorized $300,000 in development assistance to AVA Tigard Development to address unanticipated site conditions;and WHEREAS, in 2023-2024, AVA utilized $227,584 of the funding to pay for System Development Charges for the project and wishes to use the remaining$'2,416 to pay for additional System Development Charges for the completed project;and WHEREAS, the development agreement has an expiration date of December 31, 2024,with the option for the parties to extend the expiration date. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,by the Tigard Town Center Development Agency that: SECTION 1: The development agreement is amended to extend the expiration date from December 31,2024, to September 15, 2025,as shown in Exhibit A. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of , 2025. Chair—City of Tigard Town Center Development Agency ATTEST: Recorder — City of Tigard Town Center Development Agency TCDA RESOLUTION NO.25- Page 1 EXHIBIT A AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT This Amendment to Development Assistance Agreement ("Amendment") is made this day of August,2025 ("Effective Date") by and between the Town Center Development Agency, an ORS Chapter 457 urban renewal agency ("TCDA") and AVA Tigard Development, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company ("AVA"). TCDA and AVA may be referred to in this Agreement jointly as the"Parties"and individually as a"Party." RECITALS A. AVA and TCDA entered into a Development Assistance Agreement for development of the real property located at 12539-12547 SW Main Street,Tigard, Oregon (the "Property"). B. Development of the Property took longer than expected and the parties now wish to amend the Development Assistance Agreement to extend the term to allow for completion and final payment. AGREEMENT 1. Section 2.3 of the Development Assistance Agreement is hereby amended to expire on September 15, 2025, after which time TCDA has no financial obligation to AVA unless the Parties extend the term of this Agreement in writing. 2. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Development Assistance Agreement remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year set forth above. TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, an ORS 457 Urban Renewal Agency, By: M. Brent Stockwell, Executive Director of the Town Center Development Agency of the City of Tigard Signed: AVA TIGARD DEVELOPMENT,LLC, an Oregon limited liability company By: Name: Amireh Saberiyan Title: Manager AIS-5917 5. E. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: TCDA Board Consideration of a Minor Amendment to the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan Authored By: Sean Farrelly Presented By: Redevelopment Manager Farrelly Item Type: Resolution Town Center Development Agency Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The Board of the Town Center Development Agency will consider a Minor Amendment to the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan, identifying three parcels (the 72nd Ave Redevelopment Site) to be acquired by the Agency. ACTION REQUESTED The Board is being asked to approve a minor amendment to the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION On May 27, 2025, the Town Center Development Agency (TCDA) authorized the acquisition of three parcels from a willing seller in the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal District. The three parcels: 1S136DC-00500, 1S136DB-02503, and 1S136DC-00502, were previously home to Tigard Regal Cinemas and are collectively known as the 72nd Ave Redevelopment Site. The site will be redeveloped into a public park with new street connections, and additional development to be determined in the next few months. Section VI of the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan ("the Plan") authorizes the Agency to acquire property within the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area for public improvements and to facilitate private redevelopment. Properties for acquisition will be identified through a minor amendment to the plan. Section IX of the plan specifies that minor amendments require approval of the TCDA by resolution. If approved, this would be the second amendment to the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION N/A ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Fiscal Impact Cost: $12,000,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where Budgeted (department/program): TCDA, CIP Additional Fiscal Notes: The Q1 amendment to the FY25-26 TCDA Budget included sufficient funds to acquire the property. Attachments TCDA Resolution Exhibit A: Minor Amendment Map CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE TIGARD TRIANGLE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN BY ADDING THE ACQUISITION OF THREE PARCELS IN THE TIGARD TRIANGLE (TAXLOT IDS 1S136DC-00500, 1S136DB-02503, and 1S136DC 00502) WHEREAS,Section VI. B of the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan authorizes the acquisition of property from willing sellers within the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area;and WHEREAS, on May 27,2025, the Town Center Development Agency authorized the initiation of the acquisition of three parcels 1S136DC-00500, 1S13GDB-02503, and 1S136DC-00502 (collectively the 72nd Ave Redevelopment Site) within the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area; and WHEREAS, Section VI of the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan requires a Minor Amendment to the Plan to identify the specific properties for acquisition;and WHEREAS, Section IX of Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan states that Minor Amendments require approval of the Town Center Development Agency by resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,by the Tigard Town Center Development Agency that: SECTION 1: Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan is hereby amended with the language shown in Exhibit A. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of , 2025. Chair—City of Tigard Town Center Development Agency ATTEST: Recorder— City of Tigard Town Center Development Agency TCDA RESOLUTION NO. 25- Page 1 Proposed Amendment#2 to Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan EXHIBIT A Proposed new text is shown in double- underline Section VI. Property Acquisition & Disposition A. Property acquisition for public improvements The Agency may acquire any property within the Area for the public improvement projects undertaken pursuant to the Plan by all legal means, including use of eminent domain. Good faith negotiations for such acquisitions must occur prior to institution of eminent domain procedures. B. Property acquisition from willing sellers The Plan authorizes Agency acquisition of any interest in property within the Area that the Agency finds is necessary for private redevelopment, but only in those cases where the property owner wishes to convey such interest to the Agency.The Plan does not authorize the Agency to use the power of eminent domain to acquire property from a private party to transfer property to another private party for private redevelopment. Property acquisition from willing sellers may be required to support development of projects within the Area. Property for Acquisition 1. 72"Ave Redevelopment Site; Taxlot IDS 151.36DC 00500. 151.36D13-02503.and 1S136DC-00502 C. Land disposition The Agency will dispose of property acquired for a public improvement project by conveyance to the appropriate public agency responsible for the construction and/or maintenance of the public improvement.The Agency may retain such property during the construction of the public improvement. The Agency may dispose of property acquired under Subsection B of this Section VI by conveying any interest in property acquired. Property shall be conveyed at its fair reuse value. Fair reuse value is the value, whether expressed in terms of rental or capital price, at which the urban renewal agency, in its discretion, determines such land should be made available in order that it may be developed, redeveloped, cleared, conserved, or rehabilitated for the purposes specified in the Plan. Because fair reuse value reflects limitations on the use of the property to those purposes specified in the Plan, the value may be lower than the property's fair market value. Where land is sold or leased,the purchaser or lessee must agree to use the land for the purposes designated in the Plan and to begin and complete the building of its improvements within a period of time that the Agency determines is reasonable. • �' L J 1 a , j Vicinity Map . 72nd Avenue Beaverton J 1 Redevelopment Site 0 Torchwood St �� Tigard � � fjJ i - -__r _I _I —t - _S —1 r 'f .—I .___J m : Tualatin m --J ?I —1 acy Oak 1 JJ �� �' -" ", -.� J I --I / l J /-7 .1: ---. -j / �I 1 S136DB02503 w 12,edS`r'' ,/7' ii v 1 z 77_,71 -...' 1S136DC00502 \ V' - L-1-4] J J .{1 S136DC00500 Atlanta St ri J ________ii ,,._ _ J _- a 1 _r_, T1 Baylor St - 0 , I i ___;—/ --I-i—j ___.1 -i _J i r j I I J 1 F.] J J J • t 1 I__J—___J _1 --I Clinton St _. 1 J Mil (`Y�' Scale: 0.07 Miles 4"&70UTH sT AIS-5888 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Legislative Session Recap Authored By: Emily Tritsch Presented By: Senator Neron Misslin, Representative Bowman, Representative Rieke-Smith Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The 83rd Oregon Legislative Assembly convened for the 2025 Legislative Session on Tuesday,January 21, and adjourned sine die on Friday,June 27. A record number of bills (over 3,400) were introduced this session. Ultimately, the legislature passed 640 bills. Our state leaders, Senator Neron Misslin, Representative Bowman, and Representative Rieke-Smith, will share an overview of the Session and highlight some of the bills that made it through Session and those that did not, including HB 2025 (the Transportation Package). This overview will focus on policy relevant to Tigard, including those related to Housing, Homelessness and Shelter Response, Infrastructure and Utilities,Transportation, and Safety. ACTION REQUESTED Council is asked to receive this presentation and ask any questions on the 2025 Legislative Session. BACKGROUND INFORMATION City Council affirmed its 2025 State Agenda in January 2025. This document is attached for reference. ALTERNATIVES& RECOMMENDATION N/A ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Attachments 2024 State Legislative Agenda �"- 'k�=: 2025 Tigard, Oregon , )p y ,, State Legislative Agenda Top Priorities Fully Funded Jurisdictional Transfer of Hall Boulevard. The City of Tigard advocates for full funding of the State of Good Repair and identified Betterments for Hall Boulevard, where it runs through Tigard; total funding requested for the transfer and improvements to Hall Boulevard in Tigard is $50 million. The state's Jurisdictional Transfer Advisory Committee supports this application. Together with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), the City of Tigard looks forward to delivering on the community's vision for this important corridor, demonstrating success in agency collaboration, community engagement, fiscal stewardship, and infrastructure management. Protect Affordable Housing. Recognizing the increasing number of affordability covenants set to expire over the next several years and the impact that the loss of these affordable units will have on our state's most vulnerable renters, the City of Tigard requests stronger regulations and robust financial incentives to encourage protection of affordable properties. Transportation The City of Tigard is led by its strategic vision: to create an equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. With this vision in mind,the City of Tigard supports transportation policy and investments that improve the safety, accessibility, and reliability of transportation systems, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve social equity. Specific transportation priorities are: ► Expand Transit Service. ► ODOT Project Delivery. In support of statewide goals related to Increase funding for ODOT project climate, equity, and accessibility, the City delivery capacity and prioritization of of Tigard advocates for investment in active transportation infrastructure to transit services and the expansion of avoid costly delays to local agencies. service areas to better serve community, particularly the most vulnerable. ► Transportation Funding. The City supports maintaining the ► Greenhouse Gas Emission State current transportation funding split Reduction Targets. between state, county, and cities. Advance efforts to reduce and regulate Additionally, the City is supportive of emissions to meet the state's carbon diversifying revenues to sustain reduction goals, including support for transportation projects as the gas tax Equitable Oregon Electric Vehicle revenue continues to decline. Rebate incentives and the related Charge Ahead incentives and Climate Protection Program. Our Community Promise--the "5 E's"of Equity, Environment,Economy, Engagement, and Excellence--is the lens through which we approach all initiatives and guide the work we do. 2025 Tigard, Oregon State Legislative Agenda Items Housing Services Tigard supports increased funding and legislation for stable, climate-friendly housing, land use, and support services. The City also advocates for state requirements to include funding for cities to implement those requirements. ► Houselessness Services. ► Tenant Assistance. Tigard supports funding efforts to Rent assistance programs should be respond to immediate health and expanded to ensure that Oregonians wellness services for houseless remain housed and the state's housing community members. The City supports crisis does not grow worse. The state clarity on the definition of how should establish a legal aid fund to "reasonableness" will support ensure landlord adherence to tenant consistency in how Time, Place, Manner protection laws. is implemented between cities. ► Affordable Housing Reform. Tigard supports the provision of state funds to backfill local system development charge exemptions for the development of affordable housing. Public Safety ► Behavioral Health Deflection Programs. Tigard supports HB 4002 and adequately funding implementation of community-based pathway to treatment, housing, and other services for individuals possessing or using controlled substances. This agenda highlights key city priorities and is one tool to support and advocate for important initiatives.In coordination with our partners, Tigard will pursue additional opportunities that align with our values as they arise. Representing Tigard - City Council • l �-s ✓f id;is Heidi Lueb Maureen Wolf Faraz Ghoddusi Yi-Kang Hu Mayor Council President Councilor Councilor Adb Heather Robbins Jake Schlack Jeanette Shaw Asher Hellhake Councilor Councilor Councilor Youth Councilor counrilmail@tigard or.gov I 503 718 2482 TiCITY OF 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon 97223 ga rd 503.639.41711 www.tigard-or.gov SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR A� (DATE OF M�a EYIN ti-exnG o F 83rd Legislative Session o II 4 ,W Review & ..„-====._. -- It‘ 'Q' * ila- �/�''' * v• August 12 , 2025 * ' =-:- :G� * 0 tgt * Off' ;, " ILA * !4WD_►_,%.•= * * * Senator Neron Misslin * * * * ** Senate District 13 1859 Representative Representative Bowman Rieke Smith House District 25 House District 26 Majority Leader Senator Representative Representative Neron Misslin Bowman Rieke Smith .(� / , W Cooper ., e� Cooper _ ��' 111111. Mountain a @a Mountain Ss' Sa' A �tiRd _ Tigard 9 Ti d 44 Sch Tigard h r. ',9a'0 i [ Pull / evil / M.. . Mountain ; i J Tu. :tin Rive T . tin Rtve . .tronal .tonal .:life Refuq. Tualatin +tile Refug. Tualatin ® Tualatin Sherwocd Sherwood d �t 1 Sys .i# - \ . Parrett Wilsonville Parrett Wilsonvilleite I , Mountain Mountain V�MP� �f�Ov it Heritage Area IN LOVING MEMORY OF SEN. AARON WOODS 1$, PUBLIC MEMORIAL WEDNESDAY, AUG. 13, 10 AM, TOWN CENTER PARK 29600 SW PARK PLACE r' THE CITY OF WILSONVILLE IS HONORED TO HOST A PUBLIC MEMORIAL AND BENCH DEDICATION TO COMMEMORATE THE LIFE AND LEGACY OF A LONG-TIME WILSONVILLE RESIDENT, BUSINESS LEADER U.S. SERVICEMAN, AND PUBLIC SERVANT. REFRESHMENTS TO FOLLOW. OVERFLOW PARKING IS AVAILABLE AT CITY HALL (29799 SW TOWN CENTER LOOP E) AND WILSONVILLE LIBRARY (8200 SW WILSONVILLE ROAD) WITH A FREE SHUTTLE PROVIDED TO THE EVENT �° 2025 District Transportation Focus Priorities , 1 : 1 ,-'14: "~ ' _:-t r i Protecting 50/30/20 distribution t# "il r F� Safe Routes to School Great Streets Program Hall Boulevard Jurisdictional Transfer - It Transit WES to Salem ` Fair distribution of STIF Governor Calling for Special Session : Aug 29/Sept 1 HB2025 (failed to earn enough support) t Roadshow themes: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Jobs, Multimodal, Transit, Equity, Safety • Deliver on Operations and Maintenance, Finishing Projects 4 Create a strong funding framework to counter declining Gas Tax Revenue Governor Called Special session to address imminent budget shortfalls Prevent ODOT layoffs and preserve critical services (transit, incident response) • Protect 50/30/20 and remove certain statutory references to tolling r- 9-^ *dge • Accountability for ODOT ;_ • Revenue solutions: Gas Tax +6 cents Registration Fees $42 base, +$30 for EVs and +40 MPG Tatft' : Title Fees +$139 TAkt • • . ; " Additional 0.1 % in payroll tax to STIF Rr, ' • Housing and Homelessness .e•• Ore ;&.:16.• -ftip Established Statewide Shelter Program (HB 3644) 4 s • Ne Regional coordination of funds . It t�,,0 a Pre-development Loans (HB 2964): 6161 ► r a ! - OHCS loans/grants for new affordable housing infrastructure Capped Rent increases on land in Manufactured Home Communities at 6% (HB_3054) Prohibits unfair management practices and interior inspections as a condition of sale Housing Infrastructure Funding (HB 3031): Financial Assistance (Low-interest loans/grants) for affordable housing infrastructure Middle Housing Expansion (HB 2138): Expands allowable middle housing and includes urban unincorporated lands. "Shot clock" for reviewing land use applications for housing (SB 974) Puts 120-day timeline on review of final engineering plans for residential development Healthcare Corporate Practice of Medicine (SB 951) Curbing private equity ownership prevents non-medical executives from overriding the judgement of physicians Strengthened the Oregon Health Plan (HB 2010): Federal government impacts on healthcare Funding for our Medicaid program: Oregon Health Plan OHP serves 1 ,400,000 people (1/3 of Oregonians, '/2 of Oregon's children) These dollars stabilize hospitals, save lives, and support long term care facilities International Licensure Pathways for Physicians (SB 476) Menopause Healthcare Insurance (HB 3064) Behavioral Health -' Redefine Civil Commitment Standards (HB 2005) -, Behavioral Health Workforce Grants (HB 2024) $6 million for provider recruitment and retention Community Based Treatment (HB 3069) Funding and reforms for essential grants Youth Substance Use Prevention Program (HB 3321) Addressing Fentanyl Crisis (SB 236) Stronger penalties for dealing fentanyl, expanded services Non-opioid directive (HB 3211) a nonopioid directive form will be available to the public -* Opioid Alternative Options (SB 598) non-opioid prescription drug coverage by insurance as an Safety, Justice, Compassion Police and Public Works Facility - City of Tigard Emergency Operations $3 million secured for planning and design of new resiliency infrastructure: a Police and Public Works Facility that will serve as the Emergency Operations Center. Focus on cross laminated timber and on-site battery storage State dollars will prepare for and complement future local investment Washington County Courthouse Replacement Project $1 .25 million secured for planning and design of the future Courthouse Current courthouse is not ADA compliant and too small, limiting timely justice Just Compassion Shelter Past investments included State-directed dollars New beds opened this year in the expanded Resource Center -! I1 ', Community Safety Firearm Safety (SB 243) Allows local governments to adopt policies banning firearms on their premises ® Bans rapid-fire devices 40 Sets March 2026 implementation date for M114, passed by voters -' Wildfire Funding and Policy (SB 85) Studying effective community-based wildfire risk mitigation to increase insurance affordability Repealed Wildfire maps & partially funded wildfire response -, Child Data Privacy (HB 2008): Data for Oregonians younger than 16 cannot be sold A child cannot be targeted for advertising, or consumer profiling precise location of child cannot be identified Early Childhood / Childcare Expanded Allowable Preschool Locations (SB 1099) Requires cities to allow preschool on lands where worship is allowed Expanded allowable locations for Child Care Facility (HB 3560) cities will need to update local plans and land use regulations with the new zoning requirements by January 2027 Perinatal Services (SB 692) "Momnibus" OHA will support community-based perinatal services and requires insurers cover for medicaid Preventing Eviction of babies (SB 690) Delays eviction for tenants with a baby if already approved for rent assistance Lake Local Economy noire 1. Baseball, Festivals, Markets, The Arts s . Sherwood' Restored Recreational Immunity (SB 179) 1 • Industrial Site Readiness Loan Fund (HB 2411) - � , J • $10 million helps unlock land for industrial development ;-t • Stimulates strategic, long term growth and family-wage jobs I - -- Energy Affordability: We addressed the rising cost of Utilities �► Fair Energy Act (HB 3179): Requires that utilities provide an economic impact assessment on residential ratepayers before seeking any rate increase The POWER Act (HB 3546): Prevents residential customers from subsidizing data centers Performance-Based Re•ulation SB 688 : Add s•ecific efficient •oals and GHG metrics. Federal Actions, State Impacts -+ Costs to consumers are increasing with tariffs Income Tax Revenue decreases with layoffs —3 Impacts to state budget: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Medicaid / Oregon Health Plan (OHP) Transportation (eg: EV infrastructure) Libraries Education Estimated $15 Billion Oregon Shortfall over the next 3 biennium -4 Attorney General Rayfield is actively defending Oregon's interests through Judicial means 2025 Session Summary in Numbers Convened January 21 - June 27 Committees Measures Each measure is sent to one or • 1 ,267 Senate Bills more committees • 2,037 House Bills • 1 ,483 Committee Meetings • 76 Concurrent Resolutions • 2,377 Public Hearings 56 Joint Resolutions • 2,295 Work Sessions (votes) • 24 Joint Memorials 6 Resolutions Public Engagement 1 ,915 Proposed amendments 17,678 Sign-Ups to testify in public • 640 bills sent to Governor for hearings signature 101 ,899 Pieces of written • 97.3% earned bipartisan support testimony submitted Legislative Summary Reports Behavioral Health Energy and Environment Business and Consumer Protection Health Care Civil Law Housing, Development, and Homelessness Courts Human Services Criminal Justice Labor and Employment Early Childhood Natural Resources Education Transportation and Infrastructure Emergency Preparedness Veterans 2025 END OF SESSION Closing Remarks & Questions JOINT TOWN HALL -) Joint Town Hall on Saturday, August 23rd Tigard Public Library @ 10am - Senator Neron Misslin 'ft,iart�' 503-986-1713 IF ,i� • Sen.CourtnevNeronMisslin oregonleaislature.gov % �L,,� - Representative Bowman • 503-819-0121 • Rep. Sen. Majority • Rep.BenBowman(c�oregonlegislature.gov Sue Courtney Leader Rieke Neon Rep Ben -+ Representative Rieke Smith Smith Misslin Bowman • 503-930-5778 SATURDAY, AUGUST 23, 2025 10.00 AM - 11:00 AM • Rep.SueRiekeSmith@oregonlegislature.gov Tigard Public Library 13500 SW Halt Blvd, Tigard, OR AIS-5876 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: National Community Survey Results Authored By: Alexandra Richardson Presented By: Management Analyst Richardson Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The Council is asked to receive a report on the 2025 National Community Survey (NCS) results. Developed by the National Research Center and Polco, the National Community Survey is about the "livability" of Tigard. In Polco's words, a livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. The survey categorizes livability into ten facets: Safety, Mobility, Community Design, Inclusivity and Engagement, Health and Wellness, Economy, Utilities, Parks and Recreation, Natural Environment, and Education, Arts, and Culture. Questions cover resident perception of the quality and priority level of the city's many services, as well as an optional demographic question section. This survey is conducted in over 500 communities across the U.S. which allows for Tigard to compare our results to national benchmarks. ACTION REQUESTED Receive report and provide input on the 2025 National Community Survey results. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations Polco conducted the last community survey for the city in 2023, and results were presented to Council on September 19, 2023. The National Community Survey (NCS) is intended to be biennial, with the next survey occurring in 2027. Public Involvement 3,000 households in Tigard were randomly selected to participate in the community survey. Beginning May 1, 2025, these 3,000 households received a postcard with a QR code and link to the online version of the survey along with an invitation from Mayor Lueb. Several weeks later, the same households received a follow-up letter with a paper survey enclosed and the online link, so the resident could choose their preferred response method. Both the postcard and letter were bilingual English/Spanish. The survey itself was only available in English, but the online version could be completed in the resident's language of choice using their in-browser translator. About 4% of the mailings were returned due to invalid addresses. Of the 2,875 remaining households that received invitations to participate, 374 households completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 13%. This response rate is in line with other communities that complete the NCS. In the final 2 weeks of the 6-week survey window, on May 27th an "open participation" link became available for any community member who was not randomly selected to participate. This link was published on the city's social media accounts, shared in city newsletters, and available on bilingual flyers in the Tigard Public Library, City Hall, Farmers Markets, and other city events. This flyer was also inserted into 6,200 utility bills in early-June. Due to timing, this insert was only in English. Impacts (Community, Budget, Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Tigard. Analysis of the results can be used to understand the community's priorities and perceptions of core services, especially when viewed through the lenses of current Council Goals and the Community Promise. Additionally, the City opted for custom questions to gauge the community's perception of how the City listens to and represents diverse communities, and of the upcoming Police Department/Public Works facility project. The full report will be available to the public on the City website after the presentation to Council. Key findings and results will be summarized in a fact sheet and distributed through the city's newsletter, social media, and other methods. The Tigard team will continue to analyze the results with various departments and groups to celebrate successes and determine how to address areas for service improvement. As the City continues to survey residents on NCS' biennial schedule, comparative data captured over time will reveal deepening opportunities for the Tigard team to understand how the City's policies, programs, community engagement efforts, and public information affect residents' opinions of the city in which they live. Polco provided the following key findings from the survey data: •The majority of residents (80%) continue to rate Tigard positively as a place to live. • Compared to 2023 ratings, more respondents felt safe from property crime and violent crime and indicated that they felt safe in Tigard's downtown/commercial area during the day. • About 7 in 10 participants felt that the Tigard community does an excellent or good job at making all residents feel welcome, attracting people from diverse backgrounds, and valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds. •Transportation challenges persisted, with less than half of residents rating the overall quality of the transportation system positively, and reviews for the ease of travel by bicycle showed a significant decline. • Education and cultural opportunities faced setbacks, with opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities, and adult education opportunities, declining. Of the 123 evaluative questions included on both the 2023 and current survey iterations, 88 were statistically similar to previous results. Upward trends were seen in 7 items, while 28 ratings decreased since 2023. Some of these decreases are in line with a general decline in resident satisfaction ratings across the country. ALTERNATIVES& RECOMMENDATION The City team recommends City Council provide their thoughts and questions in response to the National Community Survey results. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Attachments NCS Report Results Presentation THE_ NCS CSTM THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY SURVEY• Tigard , OR The National Community Survey Report of Results 2025 Report by: National Research Center POWERED BY POLCO Dwkw Membkv6 AAPOR Trensoa►enev POICO Inrtiateve National Research Center at Polco is a charter member of the AAPOR Visit us online! Transparency Initiative,providing clear disclosure of our sound and W W W.pOl CO.uS ethical survey research practices About The NCSTM The National Community Survey (The NCSTM)report is about the"livability" of Tigard. A livable community is a place that is not POICO simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people t` do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco. Great communities are partnerships of the government, private CA National sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents'opinions Research considering ten central facets of a community: • Economy Center • Mobility POWERED BY POLCO •Community Design • Utilities •Safety F" • Natural Environment T H E Ncs • Parks and Recreation _ • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY SURVEY' • Inclusivity and Engagement The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 374 residents of the City of Tigard collected from May 1st, 2025 to June 10th, 2025. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 5% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2025 survey was 13%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Tigard. Safety Mobility Residents Education, s `Community Design Culture �1 Natural 44 Community it InclusivityPrivate Communities Environment I Livability &Engagement sector are partnerships among •• M Parks& � � .II. �` Health Recreation &Wellness $ Utilities Economy How the results are reported For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the"percent positive." Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer"don't know."The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab"Complete data." However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words,the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. 1 Comparisons to benchmarks NRC's database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Tigard's results are noted as being "higher"than the benchmark, "lower' than the benchmark, or"similar"to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Tigard residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser)than the benchmark. Being rated as "higher"or"lower" than the benchmark means that Tigard's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was "much higher" or"much lower,"then Tigard's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark. Trends over time Trend data for Tigard represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines,' Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than 7% between the 2023 and 2025 surveys, the change is statistically significant. 1.In 2020,The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items Consequently,some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 7 POICO Methods Selecting survey recipients All households within the City of Tigard were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Tigard was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, Go-Dog Direct, based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Tigard households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Tigard boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey. From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unit number)sampled at a rate of 5:3 compared to single family housing units. An individual within each household was randomly selected using the "birthday method". The birthday method selects a person within the household by asking the"person who most recently had a birthday" to complete the questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. Conducting the survey The 3,000 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on May 1st, 2025 and data collection for the survey remained open for 5 weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online, as well as OR codes to further encourage participation. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so, and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again. About 4% of the 3,000 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 2,875 households that received the invitations to participate, 374 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 13%. The response rate was calculated using AAPOR's response rate#2 for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.2 It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a "level of confidence" and accompanying "confidence interval" (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents' opinions are relied on to estimate all residents' opinions. The margin of error for the City of Tigard survey is no greater than plus or minus 5% around any given percent reported for all respondents (374 completed surveys). In addition to the randomly selected "probability sample" of households, a link to an online open-participation survey was publicized by the City of Tigard. The open-participation survey was identical to the random sample survey, with two small updates; it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Tigard and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open-participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on May 27th, 2025. The survey remained open for two weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open-participation respondents. Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a "key and verify" method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2020 Census and 2023 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Tigard. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics 3 used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, and housing tenure. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.' The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. Unweighted Weighted Target 4 Age 18-34 9% 27% 27% 35-54 29% 37% 37% 55+ 63% 36% 36% Hispanic No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin 96% 89% 89% origin Yes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic, 4% 11% 11 Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin Housing Own 84% 61% 61% tenure Rent 16% 39% 39% Housing type Attached 24% 41% 41% Detached 76% 59% 59% Race & Not white alone 17% 29% 29% Hispanic origin White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 83% 7 1% 71% Sex Man 39% 48% 48% Woman 61% 52% 52% Sex/age Man 18-34 3% 14% 14% Man 35-54 10% 18% 18% Man 55+ 26% 17% 17% Woman 18-34 5% 13% 13% Woman 35-54 19% 19% 19% Woman 55+ 37% 19% 19% The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the "percent positive." The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating "yes" or participating in an activity at least once a month. 4 On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer"don't know." The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab "Complete data". However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Tigard funded this research. Please contact Alex Richardson of the City of Tigard at alex.richardson@tigard-or.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Study Limitations All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were designed to minimize this error as much as possible. these other sources of potential error should be acknowledged. Non-response error arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may have different opinions or experiences than those who did respond. Coverage error refers to the possibility that some respondents that should have been included in the surveyed population were not (e.g., for a general resident survey, USPS mailing lists may exclude certain types of housing units, such as multi-family buildings where mail is delivered to a common area rather than to a specific unit (though this is rare), or where mail is received at a PO box instead of the at household's physical location. Finally, recall bias occurs when respondents may not perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events), and social desirability bias may cause respondents to answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light. Survey Validity See the Polca Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https:/ibloq.polco.us/polco-knowledgebase/margin-of- error-and-confide n ce-1 evel-in-survey-results 2.See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at httos.,aapor.onstandards-and-ethn;srstandard-defnibons; 3.Pasek J.(2014).ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from has surveyinsights orcfwp content/uploads12014;07'Fuli anesrake-paper pdf 4.Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2023 American Community Survey 5 Key Findings Highest-performing areas: . The majority of residents (80%)continue to rate Tigard positively as a place to live. About 7 in 10 participants also offered excellent or good ratings to Tigard as a place to work, which marked an increase from 2023 results (from 66% excellent or good to 73% in 2025). A slightly higher proportion indicated that they would recommend living in Tigard to someone who asks and plan to remain in Tigard for the next five years (85% and 84%, respectively). • Compared to 2023 ratings, more respondents felt safe from property crime and violent crime, and indicated that they felt safe in Tigard's downtown/commercial area during the day. • Fire and emergency services earned high confidence from residents, with fire services receiving positive ratings from nearly 9 in 10 participants and ambulance or emergency medical services rated positively by about 82% of residents. •About 7 in 10 participants felt that the Tigard community does an excellent or good job at making all residents feel welcome, attracting people from diverse backgrounds, and valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds. Similarly, when asked about Tigard government's performance, about 6 in 10 residents rated the local government positively on understanding and representing the needs of underrepresented and diverse communities. A similar proportion gave favorable ratings to local government for actively engaging and listening to the people and communities most affected by its decisions before making them. Areas of Focus: • Transportation challenges persisted, with less than half of residents rating the overall quality of the transportation system positively (47%), and reviews for the ease of travel by bicycle showed a significant decline from 58% in 2023 to 49% in 2025. Tigard's traffic flow on major streets (25%) as well as ease of travel by car(53%)were both rated lower than the national benchmark. Only about 3 in 10 respondents rated street repair services as excellent or good. • Education and cultural opportunities faced setbacks, with opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities declining from 51% in 2023 to 43% in 2025, and availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool dropping from 41% to 30%. Only 2 in 10 residents rated adult education opportunities highly, declining from 3 in 10 residents in 2023. Other notable results: . Awareness of municipal initiatives varied, with about half of residents (51%) indicating they were not aware of the potential bond measure that would fund a new building for Tigard's police, emergency response, and public works departments being considered for the 2026 ballot. When asked whether they would support or oppose this bond, 66% of participants stated they would strongly or somewhat support. .About 6 in 10 residents rated the physical condition of the Tigard Police Department located in City Hall as excellent or good. A similar proportion offered positive ratings for the Tigard Public Works building. Areas of greatest change since 2023: Of the 123 evaluative questions included on both the 2023 and current survey iterations, 88 were statistically similar to previous results. Upward trends were seen in 7 items, while 28 ratings decreased since 2023. The most significant of those trends are listed below. Increases .Violent crime (+12%) •Water resources (lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.; +10%) •Tigard as a place to work(+8%) • Crime prevention (+8%) .Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area (+8%) Decreases . Economic development (-17%) • Bus or transit services (-16%) • Overall image or reputation of Tigard (-12%) • Treating all residents fairly (-12%) 6 • Informing residents about issues facing the community (-11%) Facets of livability :; Polco Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. Quality and Importance by the Numbers The table below shows the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority(importance)placed on each. Also displayed is whether local quality ratings were lower, similar,or higher than communities across the country(the national benchmark). Quality Facet of Importance %excellent or good Livability %essential or very important 80% Natural Environment 80% 80% Utilities �86% 78% Parks and Recreation 80% 76% Safety 88% 62% Health and Wellness 70% 62% Economy 186% 54% Community Design 72% 48% Education, Arts,and Culture 167% 47% Mobility 178% 39% Inclusivity and Engagement 64% vs. national benchmark vs. national benchmark ❑Similar ❑Similar Quality/importance Gap Analysis The gap analysis chart below shows the same data as above; however,this chart more clearly illustrates the comparative differences in quality and importance ratings for each facet, as well as the absolute ratings for each. Safety Quality ®76% Importance _ _ _ 88%* Utilities Quality 080% Importance 9 86% Economy Quality 062% Importance _ — -- �86%" Natural Environment Quality •80% Importance 80%° Parks and Recreation Quality 78% Importance , •80% Mobility Quality ®47% Importance , _ _.78% Community Design Quality 4054% Importance •72% Health and Wellness Quality •62% Importance _ 70%° Education,Arts,and C.. Quality `48% Importance •67% Inclusivity and Engage.. .Quality .39% Importance +♦64% • Quality • Importance 7 Polco The overall quality of life in Tigard, 2025 Quality of Life Excellent _20% Measuring community livability starts with assessing the quality of life of those who live there, Good 58% and ensuring that the community is attractive, accessible, and welcoming to all. Fair _20% Poor 3% Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Tigard. (% excellent or good) vs.national 2023 2025 benchmark' 89% 80% Similar Tigard as a place to live 81°/= —78% Similar The overall quality of life Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. (%very or somewhat likely) 2023 2025 Recommend living in Tigard to someone 89% 85% Similar who asks 83% 84% Similar Remain in Tigard for the next five years Please rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 62% Similar Overall image or reputation 8.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.If no companson is available,this is left blank a Overall confidence in Tigard government, Polco 2025 Governance Excellent 6% Strong local governments produce results that meet the needs of residents while making the best Good 44% use of available resources, and are responsive to the present and future needs of the community as a whole. Fair 35% Poor 15% Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2425 vs.national benchmark' 69°40---•63% Similar Public information services 77°/ 73% Similar Overall customer service by Tigard employees Please rate the following categories of Tigard government performance. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 The value of services for the taxes paid to 46°/ 49% Tigard The overall direction that Tigard is taking 60°/ 56% The job Tigard government does at welcoming 53°/ 50% Similar resident involvement Overall confidence in Tigard government 54°/ 50% Similar Generally acting in the best interest of the 58% 57% Similar community Being honest 61% 61% Similar Being open and transparent to the public 58% 58% Similar Informing residents about issues facing the 57°/ 46% Similar community 0 58% Treating all residents fairly 75% 67(1/0 Treating residents with respect Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 Attended a local public meeting 17% 12°/ 36% 33% Lower Contacted the City of Tigard for help or information Contacted Tigard elected officials to express your opinion 10y 11% Watched a local public meeting 17y 18% Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 69 k —167% The City of Tigard The Federal Government 284'.46 ---•24% Lower 9.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown If no comparison is available,this is left blank. 10 POICO Overall economic health of Tigard, 2025 Excellent 6% Economy Local governments work together with private and Good 56% nonprofit businesses,and with the community at large,to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a thriving local economy. Fair 32% Poor 6% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (%excellent or good) vs.national 2023 2025 benchmark'° 65% '�62% Overall economic health Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Tigard. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 66% 73% Tigard as a place to work T Tigard as a place to visit 45% 47% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 57% 40% Economic development Similar Please rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 70% 67% Similar Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service 60°4 60% Similar establishments 11 50% Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area 42% 11 Employment opportunities 59°/ 60% Shopping opportunities Cost of living 3g°/ \sa What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (%very or somewhat positive) 2023 2025 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 11 Comparison to the national benchmark is shown If no comparison is available,this is left blank 12 Polco Overall quality of the transportation system in Tigard, 2025 Mobility Excellent 12% The ease with which residents can move about their communities, whether for commuting, Good 35% leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work, and play in the community. Fair 35% Poor 19% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (%excellent or good) vs.national 2023 2025 benchmark" • •47% Filar Overall quality of the transportation 49% system Please also rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 Traffic flow on major streets 24°/ 25% Lower 47% Similar Ease of public parking 56°/ 53% Lower Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation 49% Similar 58y 49% Similar Ease of travel by bicycle 61% 55% Similar Ease of walking 13 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (%yes) 2023 2025 Used public transportation instead of driving 34% 32% Carpooled with other adults or children 53% 52% instead of driving alone 65°/ 67% Walked or biked instead of driving Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 Traffic enforcement 52% 48% Similar Traffic signal timing 41% 44% Similar Street repair 27% 29% Lower Street cleaning 67% n7f Street lighting 58°/ 59% Snow removal 38°/ 44% Lower Sidewalk maintenance 47% 44% Similar 43% Bus or transit services Similar 11.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown If no comparison is available,this is left blank 14 POlCO Overall design or layout of Tigard's residential and commercial areas, 2025 Community Design Excellent 9% A well-designed community enhances the quality of life for its residents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, Good as ensuring that affordable housing is accessible to all, and providing access to parks and other green spaces. Fair 33% Poor 14°/0 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 vs.national benchmark" 51°i 54% Similar Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 87 82% Similar Your neighborhood as a place to live Please also rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 37% Well-planned residential growth 45 Similar Well-planned commercial growth 41% I 35% Similar 51%08 - •50% Similar Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural 51% 50% Similar character of the community 15 586/ 57% Similar Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options 4 52% Similar Availability of affordable quality housing 19% Similar 48% Overall quality of new development y Similar 55% Similar Overall appearance Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 32% Land use, planning and zoning 34% Code enforcement 12.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available this is left blank 16 POICO Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Tigard, 2025 Utilities Excellent 18"1/0 Services such as water, gas, electricity, and intemet access play a vital role in ensuring the Good 62% physical and economic health and well-being of the communities they serve. Fair 14% Poor 6% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs.national 2023 2025 benchmark" 75°i 80% adtiElr Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 Affordable high-speed intemet access 54% 58% Simil 81% 79% Simi : Garbage collection 88% 84%. Higher Drinking water 84% 85% irt�ilat` Sewer services 72% 79g'• Similar Storm water management °f 77°X• Similar Power(electric and/or gas)utility 73% 59% Utility billing Similar 13.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available,this is left blank 17 Polco Overall feeling of safety in Tigard, 2025 Excellent 24% Safety Public safety is often the most important task Good 52% facing local governments. All residents should feel safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the greater community, and providing robust safety-related services is essential to Fair . 19% residents'quality of life. Poor 5% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 vs.national benchmark'4 73°/ 76% Similar Overall feeling of safety Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: (%very or somewhat safe) 2023 2025 91'/.$ —93% Similar In your neighborhood during the day 87% In Tigard's downtown/commercial 79'/ Similar area during the day 75% From property crime Similar 86% 73°/ 3ia�iimr From violent crime 11 85°/ 88% From fire, flood, or other natural disaster 18 Please rate the quality of each of the following services In Tigard. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 67% Similar Police/Sheriff services 65% Crime prevention 57% 11 Similar Animal control 63%A •62% Similar 87% 82% Similar Ambulance or emergency medical services 92'/ 88% Similar Fire services Fire prevention and education 66y 71% Similar 60 Emergency preparedness °/"0 •60% Similar 14.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available.this is left blank. 19 Polco Overall quality of natural environment in Tigard, 2025 Natural Environment Excellent 29% The natural environment plays a vital role in the health and well-being of residents. The natural spaces in which Good 51% residents live and experience their communities has a direct and profound effect on quality of life. Fair -18% Poor 2% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (%excellent or good) vs.national 2019 2021 2023 2025 benchmark" 78%•---•80 Overall quality of natural environment Please also rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (%excellent or good) 2019 2021 2023 2025 Cleanliness 65%s•65% Similar 69% Water resources 60%— Similar 86% Similar Air quality Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2019 2021 2023 2025 Preservation of natural areas SjrnPlr Tigard open space 60°/a.--��65% 71%110----i70% Recycling Yard waste pick-up 75°40------•69% 15.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available,this is left blank 20 POICO Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities, 2025 Parks and Recreation Excellent 29% "There are no communities that pride themselves on their quality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location for businesses to relocate, or Good 49% maintain that they are environmental stewards of their natural resources,without such communities having a robust,active system of parks and Fair 18% recreation programs for public use and enjoyment." -National Recreation and Park Association Poor 3% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 vs.national benchmark's Overall quality of parks and recreation 79% 78% opportunities Please also rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 81% 73% Similar Availability of paths and walking trails 79°/ 68% Similar Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities 60% 61% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 78°/ 76% Similar City parks Recreation programs or classes Similar 49% Recreation centers or facilities 59°/ Lower 16 Comparison to the national benchmark is shown If no comparison is available,this is left blank 21 .0" POICO Overall health and wellness opportunities in Tigard, 2025 Health and Wellness Excellent 14% The characteristics of and amenities available in the communities in which people live has a Good 48% direct impact on the health and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality of life overall. Fair 30% Poor 8% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 vs.national benchmark" Overall health and wellness opportunities Please also rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 51% Availability of affordable quality food rho/ 46% Availability of affordable quality health Similar care 49% Availability of preventive health Similar services Availability of affordable quality 39°/ 39% Similar mental health care Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 57% Similar Health services 22 Please rate your overall health. (%excellent or very good) 2023 2025 69°/ 68% Please rate your overall health. 17 Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available,this is left blank 23 Overall opportunities for education, Polco culture and the arts, 2025 Education, Arts, and Culture Excellent 12% Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic Good 36% engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the local community Fair 40% Poor 12% Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (%excellent or good) vs.national 2023 2025 benchmark" 53°/ 48% Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Please also rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 51% 43% Opportunities to attend Similar cultural/arts/music activities 48% Similar Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Similar 57% •53% Similar K-12 education Adult educational opportunities 36°/ 26% Lower 55% Opportunities to attend special events and festivals 24 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 92°/ 87% Public library services 18.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.if no comparison is available,this is left blank 25 Residents' connection and engagement with Polco their community, 2025 Inclusivity and Engagement Excellent % Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental 1 feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to Good ;31 participate within their communities feel more — included, involved, and engaged than those who do not. Fair 51% Poor 10°do Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs.national 2023 2025 benchmark' Residents' connection and engagement 46% ., with their community Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Tigard. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 79%= ♦75/ Similar Tigard as a place to raise children 65 61% Similar Tigard as a place to retire Sense of community 51° 46°0amilar Please rate the job you feel the Tigard community does at each of the following. (°io excellent or good) 2023 2025 66°i 70°b Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse 63°/ 68°'° backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from 70°/ 71°° diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 59% 53°'° Please also rate each of the following in the Tigard community. (%excellent or good) 2023 2025 44°/ 44% Lower Sense of civic/community pride 60°/ 53% Similar Neighborliness of residents 549' 51% Similar Opportunities to participate in social events and activities �58% Similar Opportunities to volunteer 57% 59% Similar Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the 63% Simile community toward people of diverse backgrounds Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% excellent or good) 2023 2025 15% Campaigned or advocated for a local 1 0°/ issue,cause,or candidate 19.Comparison to the national benchmark is shown.If no comparison is available,this is left blank. 21 Custom questions Below are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default,"don't know"responses are excluded. Please rate the Understanding and representing the Excellent1. 23% following needs of underrepresented and categories of diverse communities Tigard government Good 43% performance. Fair 111 20% Poor II 14% Actively engaging and listening to the Excellent I 9% people and communities most affected by its decisions before making them Good 50% Fair II 21% Poor . 20% Please rate the Tigard Police Department(located in Excellent III 22% physical condition City Hall) of the following City of Tigard Good 58% facilities: Fair I 15% PoorI 6% Tigard Public Works building Excellent II 21% Good 55% Fair 1 17% Poor 1 6% 28 Are you aware of the potentia bond Yes 49% measure on the May 2026 ballot that would fund a new building for Tigard's police,emergency response, No 51% and public works departments? The City of Tigard is considering a Strong y support . 24% bond measure for the 2026 ballot to fund a new building for the police, emergency response,and public Somewhat support 42% works departments. If passed, it could increase property taxes by about$100 per year. How much ' would you support or oppose this Somewhat oppose 11'/. measure? Strongly oppose . 23% 29 Please complete this survey if you are the adult(age 18 or older)in the household who most recently had a birthday(the year of birth does not matter).Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Tigard. J:xcellent Q0i Eak EQQr Don'tknow Tigard as a place to live 1 2 3 4 5 Yourneighborhood as a place to live....»...»....»...»....»...»..............»........»......,..» 1 2 3 4 5 Tigard as a place to raise children................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Tigardas a place to work......................................»....»........................... 1 2 3 4 5 Tigard as a place to visit.......... .. ....._... .... .. ...._.... ... ... .... ... ... ... ....»..........» 1 2 3 4 5 Tigardas a place to retire...........................»...__.,..................................»........._....»....»1 2 3 4 5 Theoverall quality of life in Tigard......................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Senseof community__.........._................—..—..—......—..---.».........»....................»1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Tigard as a whole. Excellent cioed fair Poor Don't know Overall economic health of Tigard 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the transportation system(auto,bicycle,foot,bus) inTigard .... ..._... .... .. .... ... ... ..... .. .. .. .. »... .. ... .. »...».. ...»... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall design or layout of Tigard's residential and commercial areas(e.g.,homes,buildings,streets,parks,etc.) ..................................»....» 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Tigard.........»»..»...»..........»....»....».. (water,sewer,storm water,electric/gas,broadband)..........._...............» 1 2 3 4 5 Overall feeling of safety in Tigard. - — . —*MI.0 N. I. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of natural environment in Tigard...........»»..».....»..»...._.».....» 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities...................................»....»1 2 3 4 5 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Tigard...........—.......-----..— 2 3 4 5 Overall opportunities for education,culture,and the arts...........�................_....»1 2 3 4 5 Residents'connection and engagement with their community.»...............»..,,»1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don't likely likely unlikely unlikely know Recommend living in Tigard to someone who asks.._........................1 2 3 4 5 Remain in Tigard for the next five years--......-------.............1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don't a(g Sale nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know In your neighborhood during the day............—.......—.........».l 2 3 4 5 6 In Tigard's downtown/commercial area duringthe day. ............»»...... ..».»»...» . ....».................1 2 3 4 5 6 From property crime.........................................................---..1 2 3 4 5 6 Prom violent crime..._.......»»...»...»...._..».........._.......»....»..._.......1 2 3 4 5 6 From fire,flood,or other natural disaster 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate the job you feel the Tigard community does at each of the following. Excellentcood Fair Poor Don't know Making all residents feel welcome 1 2 3 4 5 Attracting people from diverse backgrounds... .............._ 1 2 3 4 5 Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds 1 2 3 4 5 Taking care of vulnerable residents(elderly,disabled,homeless,etc.)........_ 1 2 3 4 5 6. Please rate each of the following in the Tigard community. E cellent Caul Fait Poor J)ori t know Overall quality of business and service establishments in Tigard.............— 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of business and service establishments in Tigard-----..—....---1 2 3 4 5 Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area...............».........._.........»..»....»...»....»...» 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 Shopping opportunities.... ... ... ......... .... ..»... ..» ...»... .........».......»....». »....M.1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 Overall image or reputation of Tigard............»...»........»»...» 1 2 3 4 5 30 7. Please also rate each of the following in the Tigard community. Excellent fed Fair poor Don't know Traffic flow on major streets .....».. - 1 2 3 4 5 Easeof public parking....._... ._..._._..»»........ »...._..»._......_...». »....»......»..» 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by car in Tigard .... ... .. .... ... ....w.. .. ....»..»....»...».._.... ....»...._ 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by public transportation in Tigard..........»».»....»-..»»..............»..... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by bicycle in Tigard 1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 Well-planned residential growth............»................................................_......._.........._ 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned commercial growth.................._................................_.............._..........., 1 2 3 4 5 Well-designed neighborhoods.................................... ..................._____________1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community........, 1 2 3 4 5 Public places where people want to spend time................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of housing options..--...----....--........--______.................. 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality housing...................._..............._............_....._ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of new development in Tigard.........................-.........w 1 2 3 4 5 Overall appearance of Tigard......... ..............._.......,...»........,...._.._...._..._..._......_...__ 1 2 3 4 5 Cleanliness of Tigard.._..... » ..»... ... .....»»....»....»..»..». ..»»..»...»...»..»....»..».» 1 2 3 4 5 Waterresources(lakes,ponds,riverways,etc.) ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Airquality..»... ..w... ... ....»...»... ..._.. ... ... ..... ........»....................»...»....».....» 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of paths and walking trails _.._... ..... .... ... ..1 2 3 4 5 Fitness opportunities(including exercise classes and paths or trails,etc.)...1 2 3 4 5 Recreational opportunities-......... . .............._......»...»... ... .._.... ........._.................._..1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality food........................------.--.—.—.—...1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality health care 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of preventive health services..------.—.—.—.—.....------1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality mental health care...—...........--.....---..... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities .............».........1 2 3 4 5 Community support for the arts...w..»»..............»....._.......__............................__..._....1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool........._....._ _...»»...............1 2 3 4 5 K-12 education 1 2 3 4 5 Adult educational opportunities._.....»....._..»»..._..»...»..................._.......»....».....» 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of civic/community pride._.. .._ ........_....._.... ... ...».»... ..._.. ...» .. ...._ 1 2 3 4 5 Neighborliness of residents in Tigard .. ..... .... ...._.. ...._........ ....................._..... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities....._............_____1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend special events and festivals..............................»......»..._ 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to volunteer 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in community matters........»........_....».....»..»___ 1 2 3 4 5 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds.. ... ............ ......................._ 1 2 3 4 5 8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. flit Y.Li Contacted the City of Tigard(in-person,phone,email,or web)for help or information...._.................. ..... .1 2 Contacted Tigard elected officials(in-person,phone,email,or web)to express your opinion.---.—.1 2 Attended a local public meeting(of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners,advisory boards,town halls,HOA,neighborhood watch,etc.) ............................................1 2 Watched(online or on television)a local public meeting_________—_---.__—.—___________.____1 2 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Tigard..................................__________................................1 2 Campaigned or advocated for a local issue,cause,or candidate. ,......„.. —.... ....... ». 1 2 Voted in your most recent local election.........................................................................................._....._...........................1 2 Used bus,rail,or other public transportation instead of driving_...»..........» _........»...._.»......._..._...»..................1 2 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone 1 2 Walkedor biked instead of driving. ........_..... .............._.................._..............»...................... ......».... ... ... .............., 1 2 31 9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Tigard. facellent fislosi EA& Poor Don't know Public information services...—.......—..—.---.....--...............------.....— 1 2 3 4 5 Economicdevelopment....»...».......»...._....»..»..._.........._.........._..._..._......._...._...... 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic enforcement....»...»....._...».............»..»...»......»........_........».................» 1 2 3 4 5 Trafficsignal timing......_...._.......»..._........_.........._..._.........„.........„..._._...._....„...... 1 2 3 4 5 Streetrepair»..»....»...»...» ...»...»..».. ...»...»... ... ... ... ..... .. ...._..._._ 1 2 3 4 5 Streetcleaning......„.........»....„......................_...„.....„..._........__...„...„............_............„ 1 2 3 4 5 Streetlighting......._...»....„....»...»..»...»... ...»...»...» .. ...»...» .. ..» ..». ...»....».....» 1 2 3 4 5 Snowremoval_...._...»....»....»..........._..._..._..............._...».....»..».................._..._......„ 1 2 3 4 5 Sidewalk maintenance..........._..................»...»..............................„....».._.........„...„._.._1 2 3 4 5 Busor transit services....... ......._..._..._..._...._..__... ...»„...»._...„....„..„....„...„ 1 2 3 4 5 Land use,planning,and zoning.. .._.. ..._..m... ..._......... .._.... ... .. ... ......»... 1 2 3 4 5 Code enforcement(weeds,abandoned buildings,etc.)..—..—.—..---.....— 1 2 3 4 5 Affordable high-speed Internet access....„.._.... _.. .......... .. .._._._..._................_1 2 3 4 5 Garbagecollection......._.....».. .. ..» ... .._..._..»....»»...»..»....».„»..»...»..»».»...».» 1 2 3 4 5 Drinkingwater.....................„ 1 2 3 4 5 Sewerservices......_...„.... .... .. ..„..._...„..._...» ..„ .._...„... ..»........»..„• 1 2 3 4 5 Storm water management(storm drainage,dams,levees,etc.) 1 2 3 4 5 Power(electric and/or gas)utiiity.._..w..„_..»..._..._............_..„..„...._...».....» 1 2 3 4 5 Utilitybilling ... ... ...„.._...._..„.. ...„....».........„....„...._...„............._ 1 2 3 4 5 Police/Sheri6 servlces......„...„.......».._...»„..»..»»....»..»...»»..».»....._..»...»..... 1 2 3 4 5 Crimeprevention..................._....».................................................„....„ 1 2 3 4 5 Animal control ...._...»... ...._..»..»...»..»..»..»..»».»...»...»»..»..»»...».. ....»... .... 1 2 3 4 5 Ambulance or emergency medical services................____________...... 1 2 3 4 5 Fireservices .. .... ... .... ....„..»..„..».. ..»..„ .......»........ ...»........»..» 1 2 3 4 5 Fire prevention and education............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Emergency preparedness(services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations)...............»...» 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of natural areas(open space,farmlands,and greenbelts) 1 2 3 4 5 Tigard open space.... ...„....».».._..._.. ..».. ..„...»...„.. ...».»»..._. .....»...»....».„1 2 3 4 5 Recycling—_____________....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Yard waste pick-up.._...»..... ..»..»...»..».._.,._.......»...»...»..»..»_..»..»..»»...„»....» 1 2 3 4 5 Cityparks »....»...»...»». ..... .. .. ....»..».. ........ ..... ... .... ...._... ... .._...._.......... ....1 2 3 4 5 2 3 4 5 Recreation centers or facilities 1 2 3 4 5 Health services ..„„.„..„»...»..» »...».. ...».. ...»...»...».........»...»...»..»....».......» 1 2 3 4 5 Public library services 1 2 3 4 5 Overall customer service by Tigard employees (police,receptionists,planners,etc.) .._...„....._...„.....».._........„..._..............._.1 2 3 4 5 10. Please rate the following categories of Tigard government performance. Excellent Good fair poor Net t know The value of services for the taxes paid to Tigard 1 2 3 4 5 The overall direction that Tigard is taking.....„....„....»........._....„.......»...»»......,..„1 2 3 4 5 The Job Tigard government does at welcoming resident involvement» 1 2 3 4 5 Overall confidence in Tigard government..............................._..._.._ 1 2 3 4 5 Generally acting in the best interest of the community.........„........„ 1 2 3 4 5 Beinghonest ... ..._... .... ... ... ..„... ...»..„ .. .„ .. .._..„ ..»....»...»»....»........» 1 2 3 4 5 Being open and transparent to the public........._______—_—..—..—__..... 1 2 3 4 5 Informing residents about issues facing the community.._......._..._...._..... 1 2 3 4 5 Treating all residents fairly...... ............. ........ ... .... .......... .._.. ..„.... ...._ 1 2 3 4 5 Treating residents with respect. .._.„....„..._...._........„.........»...„..„.......„...„.....„ 1 2 3 4 5 Understanding and representing the needs of underrepresented and diverse communities 1 2 3 4 5 Actively engaging and listening to the people and communities most affected by its decisions before making them..............„.......„....».._...„..._._.-».1 2 3 4 5 32 11. Overall,how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good. Fair Poor Don't know The City of Tigard 1 2 3 4 5 The Federal Government 1 2 3 4 5 12. Please rate how important,if at all,you think it is for the Tigard community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Very Somewhat Not at all Essential important important important Overall economic health of Tigard 1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the transportation system(auto,bicycle,foot,bus) in Tigard 1 2 3 4 Overall design or layout of Tigard's residential and commercial areas(e.g.,homes,buildings,streets,parks,etc.) 1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Tigard (water,sewer,storm water,electric/gas,broadband) 1 2 3 4 Overall feeling of safety in Tigard 1 2 3 4 Overall quality of natural environment in Tigard 1 2 3 4 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 1 2 3 4 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Tigard 1 2 3 4 Overall opportunities for education,culture,and the arts 1 2 3 4 Residents'connection and engagement with their community 1 2 3 4 13.Please rate the physical condition of the following City of Tigard facilities: Excellent Good Fair Poor Don't know Tigard Police Department(located in City Hall) 1 2 3 4 5 Tigard Public Works building 1 2 3 4 5 14.Are you aware of the potential bond measure on the May 2026 ballot that would fund a new building for Tigard's police,emergency response,and public works departments? O Yes O No 15.The City of Tigard is considering a bond measure for the 2026 ballot to fund a new building for the police, emergency response,and public works departments.If passed,it could increase property taxes by about$100 per year.How much would you support or oppose this measure? 0 Strongly support 0 Somewhat support 0 Somewhat oppose 0 Strongly oppose 0 Don't know 33 Our last questions are about you and your household. Again,all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. D1. In general,how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don't times a day a day a week few weeks or never know Access the internet from your home using a computer,laptop,or tablet computer 1 2 3 4 5 6 Access the Internet from your cell phone 1 2 3 4 5 6 Visit social media sites such as Facebook, X(formerly Twitter),Nextdoor,etc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Use or check email 1 2 3 4 5 6 Share your opinions online 1 2 3 4 5 6 Shop online 1 2 3 4 5 6 D2. Please rate your overall health. 0 Excellent 0 Very good 0 Good 0 Fair 0 Poor D3. What impact,if any,do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: O Very positive 0 Somewhat positive 0 Neutral 0 Somewhat negative 0 Very negative D4. How many years have you lived in Tigard? D10. How much do you anticipate your household's total O Less than 2 years income before taxes will be for the current year? O 2-5 years (Please include in your total income money from all O 6-10 years sources for all persons living in your household.) O 11-20 years 0 Less than$25,000 0$100,000 to$149,999 O More than 20 years 0$25,000 to$49,999 0$150,000 to$199,999 DS. Which best describes the building you live 0$50,000 to$74,999 0$200,000 to$299,999 in? 0$75,000 to$99,999 0$300,000 or more O Single-family detached home D11. Are you of Hispanic,Latino/a/x,or Spanish origin? O Townhouse or duplex(may share walls but 0 No 0 Yes no units above or below you) 0 Condominium or apartment(have units D12. What is your race?(Mark one or more races to above or below you) indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) O Mobile home 0 American Indian or Alaskan Native O Other 0 Asian D6. Do you rent or own your home? 0 Black or African American 0 Rent 0 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 Own 0 White 0 A race not listed D7. About how much is your monthly housing D13. In which category is your age? cost for the place you live(including rent, O 18-24 years O 55-64 years mortgage payment,property tax,property insurance,and homeowners'association O 25-34 years O 65-74 years (HOA)fees)? 0 35-44 years 0 75 years or older 0 Less than$300 0$2,500 to$3,999 0 45-54 years O$300 to$599 0$4,000 to$6,999 D14.What is your gender? O $600 to$999 0$7,000 to$9,999 0 Woman 0$1,000 to$1,499 0$10,000 or more 0 Man 0$1,500 to$2,499 0 Identify in another way 4 go to D 14a D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your D14a.If you identify in another way,how would you household? describe your gender? O No 0 Yes 0 Agender/1 don't identify with any gender D9. Are you or any other members of your 0 Genderqueer/gender fluid household aged 65 or older? 0 Non-binary O No 0 Yes 0 Transgender man O Transgender woman O Two-spirit O Identify in another way Thank you! Please return the completed survey in the postage-paid envelope to: National Research Center,Inc.,PO Box 549,Belle Mead,NJ 08502 34 l'‘ 3„ ......07 .1 ....,6 .,.. ....• .. ./ ., . 0 . 40 Ali ,„.........., , ' -- --U. 40 •ve' - • 1 7 , .,,‘ Ttgard - - .‘,.. , , W." • . A.:-iiii.1 1 Oh 4111 '11.1 k o I.— ‘. '•,...^ , . , . ,_ _ i • . „ . r, •••••c • ,,fr".•e, — siM1100111•"ft •,, ---- - 2025 National Community Survey Results A Polco/National Research Center Initiative -Om • A • ,--.- ,..., 4, ..le.. •',.. „...--• .- , , kaiKK' Co,IL,101,• *kir ''. i ( '‘. 114 t. A , , ... •- d' („Nr •-,, 111 ,,fii T i cI� l The 5 E's - Tigard"s Community Promise: �1 I g a Equity . Environment •. Economy •. Engagement •. Excellence 2025 National Community Survey Overview Livability factors of the Safety Mobility National Community Survey Education, la, community Arts,& 1 Culture • sit *s 4 AR Natural Community Ir Inclusivity Environment Livability &Engagement i 314: IN.... Packs& g� i Health . Recreation / &Wellness THE NCS `_ 6 .wla THE rJ.TIO.U.COMMUNITY SURVEY- Utilities Economy Polco Ti g card The 5 E s - Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy• Engagement . Excellence Survey Demographics A... 18-34 • 9% 2.%.o 122% 35-54 29% 37% 37% ❑ Representative sample of residents 55+ 63% 36% 36% Hispanic No,ism of Hiapank,La*ofah.or$pariah origin 96% 89% 69% awn nee.i consider myself to be al Hispanic ❑ Results weighted to match Tigard 4% 11% 11% LaMidNn.or Spennrh ongm demographics Rousing 0,A. 64% 61% 61% hi.UM Rant 16% 39% 39% O Postcard and letter were bilingual 1e„a..ry,,.Anacned 24% 41% 41% Spanish/English Dates 76% 59% 59% ❑ Online survey could be taken in language of Raw L Not wage alone RaceNisgarirr 17% 29% 29% origin White alone.not Hispanic or Latno 83% 71% 71% choice using in-browser translator Sea Man 39% 48% 48% Women 61% 52% 52% S.a.c. Man 18-34 3% 14% 14% Man 35-54 10% 18% 18% Man 55+ 26% 17% 17% Woman 18-34 5% 13% 13% Respondent Demographics& Wornan35-54 19% 19% 19% Weighting-p. 4 of PDF report Women 55+ 37% 19% 19% - ti T I c t TY The 5 E's - Tigard's Community Promise: gard Equity . Environment . Economy• Engagement • Excellence Overall Highlights While Tigard is experiencing some challenges - particularly in areas like 1 . ,4. transportation and economic development - there are also clear indicators of • ,� '. . �t } ► _: i;, y� � progress. �i I t , A. '',. . . ❑ Majority of residents continue to rate Tigard positively as a place to live (80%) and work (73%) r IP s _ * `� ❑ Compared to 2023, more respondents felt safe from property crime and l , violent crime - Tigard Police Department Officers ❑ About 7 in 10 participants felt that the Tigard community does an excellent or good job at making all residents feel welcome O The quality of Tigard's drinking water remains higher than the nationalilli benchmark T• CITY OF The 5 E's - Tigard's Community Promise: igard Equity . Environment • Economy• Engagement . Excellence Areas of Greatest Change Since 2023 Item Increase • Safety from violent crime 12% • Water resources (lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) 10% • Tigard as a place to work 8% • Crime prevention 8% • Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area 8% OF t Tig��a rd The 5 E's - Tigard's Community Promise: Equity . Environment • Economy• Engagement . Excellence Areas of Greatest Change Since 2023 Item Decrease • Economic development 17% • Bus or transit services 16% • Overall image or reputation of Tigard 12% • Treating all residents fairly 12% • Informing residents about issues facing the community 11% 14_01 cardThe 5 E's - Tigard"s Community Promise: g Equity . Environment . Economy . Engagement . Excellence Gap Analysis Safety Quality •76% Importance 88%410 • Utilities Quality 0 80% Importance 086% Economy Quality Q 62% Importance •86% Natural Environment Quality .80% Importance 80% Parks and Recreation Quality .78% Importance 80% Mobility Quality 047% -- Importance *78% Community Design Quality 054% Importance •72% Health and Wellness Quality 0 62% Importance el 70%, Education,Arts, and C.. Quality •48% _Importance •67% Inclusivity and Engage.. Quality ' 039% Importance ` A 64% Gap Analysis-p. 7 of PDF report 0 Quality ® Importance OF .t T i card The 5 E's - Tigard's Community Promise: fey g Equity • Environment • Economy• Engagement • Excellence , Council Goal 1 - Community Design t a 0 GOAL 1 : Create housing opportunities for current and future residents A w - T ❑ "Variety of housing options" rose from 47% to -- I 1 52% excellent or good from 2023 ; k i f- , I ❑ "Availability of affordable quality housing," (19%) ' ; 11 ►' - ilk J• "Well-planned residential growth" (37%), and 1 E! f� ! �- "Overall quality of new develo ment (48%) fell ❑ Demographics note: most likely to rate "variety ofll 1 11.-JU • i k� VF housingoptions" -- I as good or excellent — income 4 M, ®T_ 1 Red Rock Creek Commons Housing Development on SW 68th Pkwy li • CITY of The 5 E's - Tigard's Community Promise: Tigard Equity . Environment • Economy . Engagement . Excellence — Council Goal 2 - Economy Facet 0 0 GOAL 2: Elevate economic opportunities for - current and future residents - l ' 1 - I ❑ Perception of economic development saw a ,� decrease from 57% good or excellent to 40% - ., , :-..�,i `7 �;` ^, but similar to benchmark * �� `4- 0 Ratings of overall quality and variety of .. 0.er A business and service establishments remained —` !_'�'_ � , stable ��" Owners of Tigard's Good Cake Bakery -Jay Burton and Edgar Contreras ❑ Demographics note: 29% of respondents "not white alone" rated economic development "poor" as compared with "white alone" at 5% " The 5 E's - Tigard's Community Promise: IN _... rii I iard �� Equity . Environment • Economy• Engagement • Excellence Council Goal 3 - Multiple Facets / 10 * 0 GOAL 3: Cultivate Tigard as a great place to live, work, & play .1. CIMobility ❑ Overall quality of transportation system remained stable (47% good or excellent — similar to benchmark) fillr7 ❑ Ease of travel, traffic flow, street repair, and other measures saw decreases or were lower than benchmark 1 i ❑ Natural Environment and Parks & Recreation ' ❑ 4 different markers related to natural resources improved from 2023 '' u1 ' ❑ "Recreation centers or facilities" remains lower than benchmark '_ t - $� ttf r ❑ Education, Arts, & Culture - �' ❑ Surprisingly, all 8 markers within the facet went down since 2025 , - d r*''?' ❑ Only one is lower than benchmark — adult educational main Street opportunities: 26% "good or excellent" (lower 13th percentile of all communities surveyed) CITY OF ligfi The 5 E's - Tigard's Community Promise: T i g a rd Equity . Environment . Economy . Engagement . Excellence Council Goal 4 - Facilities Custom Quesji.o . red0/0 • • GOAL 4: Deliver resilient, sustainable, and well-maintained facilities at provide reliable and efficient services to our community Reese rate the Tigard Police Department°coaled in Excellent +r physical condition Cary heel Are you aware of the potential bond Yes a•, of the following measure on the May 2026 ballot that City of Tigard Good16 would fund a new building for taclitles: Tigard's police,emergency response, No Fair I m_ and public works departments? Poor I VA The City of Tigard is considering a Strurrgly support bond measure for the 2026 ballot to fund a new building for the police Don't know "', emergency response,and public , - works departments.If passed,it Somewhat support 38h Tigard Public works buldng Excellent ' r,ti could increase property taxes by about$100 per year.How much 1111 would you support or oppose this Somewhat oppose 1 t% Good �x measure Fair I ex Strongly oppose 11 Poor I 3% Don't know ., Don't know 4 TY OF illifr :� � Ti " The 5 Es - Tigard's Community Promise: Equity . Environment . Economy • Engagement . Excellence Equitable Engagement Custom Questions • Please rate the Understanding and representing the Excellent "' Understanding the Needs of following needs of underrepresented and N. categor$esof draw ecormmunrties Diverse Communities Tigard government Good lik ;,,. performance. Fair ' 11, MlIllMIEIIIIMErIMM Poor 096 2C% 40% 60% 80% 100% D know •Excellent or Good I Fair or Poor •Don't Know Actively engaging and listening to the Excellent I ay, people and comnx,nlhes most Actively Engaging a n d affected by its deosiOns before making tf,er., coed ■ Listening Fax , -10"i, 28% 329� PoorC 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Don't know ■ 32% •Excellent or Good ■Fair or Poor ■Don't Know I 11 �.J The S E's - Tigard's Community Promise:ll _-r, g (,� Equity . Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Interactive Dashboardff. &cwely engagr-g east I•e:e:rq to,se people a'd to-naln,tles-es•.aNaTbe. day t-s cecniens Pews milking tiler The NCS Report Tigard,OR 2025 •N.er]MY I Demopra°he .mil w:w. .. • ....n..+ -.tw Ga V•e'.t.q L.4 Num..n rsdwrer .•e•.. ..+ abpfeaa ComfNr,bO(15 • I -..".".....-l NOt White alone White eem The NCS Digital Dashboard National 14 Polco ' • City or Tigard 2025 Results Center oemograpne Breakdowns The Crty of Tgard'•dotal deehbaald prov.ces•comprehensive overt'....of result&horn the moo recent enplementeldn of The NCS The dashboard Mows you to Meet any gwwon hOoi MO survey•TO view 11,overll r.elo.nt'elope.12 natpn•I benchmarks sod p•rfenbles ono 13 demogreohio deekdowoh OwsOon Response Demographic To begirt.•.I.et the facet of Mabilrty you would like to esptom using the Facet Deopdown below.Al grretuona peNeang to that host NV wails alone ■ wit pop.nate at the top of P.dashboard(Tad.I To sae the OOrnpreharns a results for stdwdual questvu,seed the Rueshon itself from the second cdumn n Ted.1 Retains data for tout gueetgn arts then appear below the table 'Mule alone _M 0-alerted nlmmalsm about the benchmarks.]process.denrogreptec comparison*,and vend data can be bond on the oohs seeupn at Me GOoa Nat while alone 221% bodorn of the dashboard. While alone NW Al t :., —Table 1: Select a Question to View Results'— Fad No4 while alone XI% • Queuty o1 Ltfa While ague ■ ON Mewling Community hveorey starts wRh assessing Uq warily of We at those who bye there, , and enSunng mac the corMhRlry is e118CLttO scow able and netkomog to all I Poo! N01 NTge awe 31 x_ Welt aoM _4% Dom know Not*lure ab00 V 21N White alone TON https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/polco.me/viz/TheNCSReport-Tigard0R2025/About • 'h fi TiTY g" rd The 5 E's - Tigard's Community Promise: Equity . Environment • Economy• Engagement . Excellence Next Steps ❑ How will we pursue excellence considering these results? ❑ What areas deserve priority attention, and how should we proceed? ❑ Questions? T i card The 5 f's Tigard's Community Promise: 0—`Y. Equity . Environment . Economy. Engagement . Excellence • ' ,.l'i MA ,1°\ 1 . i' _ _ s Thankyou r A AIS-5874 8. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 08/12/2025 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Briefing on Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Action Plan Authored By: Courtney Furman Presented By: Principal Engineer Furman, Principal Transportation Planner Gehrke, & Toole Design Consultant Talia Jacobson Item Type: Update, Discussion, Direct Staff Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE In 2022, the city received a Safe Streets for All (SS4A) planning grant from the US Department of Transportation (USDOT). This briefing provides an update on the related Action Plan, a requirement of the grant, which is now underway. This corresponds to CIP 95079. ACTION REQUESTED This is an update of the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Action Plan project. The project is split into four phases: (1) Envision, (2) Understand, (3) Resolve, and (4) Commit. The previous update to Council for the Understand Phase was in February 2025. This update is for the Resolve Phase. No action is needed by Council. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations In 2022, in coordination with Metro, Washington County, and the cities within East Multnomah County, the City of Tigard was awarded $240,000 in federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) funding as a sub-recipient to Metro to develop a local comprehensive transportation safety action plan. A leadership commitment to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries is a required component of the grant to support development of a new comprehensive transportation safety action plan for the City of Tigard. In August 2023, Tigard City Council made a commitment by resolution to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries on city streets and roads using a Safe Systems approach to prioritize transportation safety. The Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Action Plan project (CIP 95079) commenced work with consultant support in May 2024. City Council approved the consultant contract in February 2024. Public Involvement The project will include a robust public engagement process with the following goals in mind: • Educate the community about the Safe Systems Approach and what the city is trying to accomplish. • Support personal connection and buy-in for Tigard's vision of equitable, safe transportation. • Honor resident's lived experience alongside data to better understand safety concerns and priorities. • Help the community understand that different agencies own different streets, and solutions may move forward in different ways on different parts of the network. • Build an understanding of city functions and interest in participating in other civic efforts. • Provide avenues for addressing concerns on partner-owned streets. Impacts (Community, Budget, Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) Tigard's SS4A Action Plan will support the city's adopted Strategic Plan priorities related to walkability and equity, the city's Complete Streets policy, and the recently adopted 2040 Transportation System Plan (2040 TSP). A formalized commitment developed through the SS4A planning process will directly support the Council's 2025-2027 goal to "Cultivate Tigard as a great place to live, work, and play." ALTERNATIVES& RECOMMENDATION N/A ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Attachments Summary Sheets Presentation Glossary Angle Sideswipe A crash where the front of one vehicle strikes the A crash where the sides of two vehicles collide while side of another.It is also known as a broadside or traveling alongside each other,either in the same or T-bone crash. opposite directions. Disregard Traffic Control Turning Movement A crash where a driver or other street user does not A crash where veh Iles collide when one or both obey a signal or stop sign. vehicles are turning. Failure to Yield A crash where a driver or other street user does not obey a yield sign(or rule of the road)that gives another street user the right to go first. Fixed Object A crash where a vehicle strikes a stationary object such as a telephone pole,a tree,or a guardrail. Head On A crash involving vehicles moving in opposite directions in which the initial contact is on the fronts of both vehicles. Out of Control A crash that occurs after a driver loses control of a vehicle. Rear End A crash where the front of one vehicle collides with the rear of another vehicle. CORRIDOR PROFILE I SW 68th/69th Avenue • ' R, i - . •., i1 t - _ ,11v : r ,. �I .'' .44 ��r amiu tzt . ,-1- , --i- 'i tt hgu �' 1s_f . :,v.r• i:- v Tigard Triangle „{ t Ir ��N .� .Tz„,,,,, , 4:i.1 ♦f ,,o a' 1, � ' i��33 4. i- •^ `t'^ by! �N eG4�' -. N'}s --it -law '..•- - • Seriaa Injury ry . :F f,,y9�% b ,��� h�hj'� _ - " - 1 • Wier Injury } . J .. / • ji• ,, fR'RQ c• n Ir PossideinN7 ..; (- . ." jr+. -Downtown ; ti` + "� / �} u , - �� g:' .'— . .6.134 ' - ,. — Prgen Comda r Nei- ♦ �= . r.. I, Lw•- S High Need Equity Areas SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 25-30mph X 45% 6 `' 31% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Collector � 31% % 1 SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) x REAR END CO®� DISREGARD TRAFFIC CONTROL INJURY 1.4 — 5 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY o 117111 � 6 POSSIBLE 0% 3% 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK IN►URY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 86% 14% 17 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 1 SW 68th/69th Avenue .... t ' di q e, e. J� GRffNBURGRO PFAFFLESim. _. �,�� . T iiii1/444,41 ..,, a� 1co QRrMOUTH ST m N Z �S\ lor D > k4�NGTw �4 i' m - Tigard-owned High Injury Network Si, G� ` H Partner ownedHigh Injury Network yygTl i L�r�kPq RpMP": -- Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network ti Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network N • f - Project Corridor IMO Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND 28 7+O/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • 0 • O 0 MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT 7% (254b NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK ��yy,,• O 170/O PRESENT kJ BICYCLE DARK/LIT 0 h 1 3% PEDESTRIAN DARK UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE ti SW 68th/69th Avenue NUMBER OF t _ CRASHES I t, La s01 II .'j�. Q TYPE OF CRASH i - T = MOVING *144° .-Ai r, • PEDESTRIAN s ~ _3`:�r VEHICLE COD BICYCLE T S ;, 1 0 RI FIXED OBJECT ir '_� ' _.....4r,... HE AD ON ''I'" c' '. .:,:iiiet.:1 ,..., REAR END '- X \iglirTh Ir. AL ANGLE { n r TURNING `' !MOVEMENT / - I. 1 _ SIDESWIPE _ ' f , ',I OUT OF CONTROL _ • • , Ar 1-. ! i4 _ ... . TWILIGHT/ ~` — — �� NIGHT TIME CRASH ' - ,,- " T..._. } Only injury crashes Y ! '' from 2018 to 2022 4 a are included in X 1. 4 diagrams.Data is 50urted from ODOT • .- `A f CORRIDOR PROFILE 1 SW 68th/69th Avenue �5 it R .� Q I -` is `!. • 1�4. I 4•••.• i cam, II * . . lll/���I Or • r acJ77* 9El • sr TIQO/drT 1 f. /r•l:,r .. N . „> •. f .:.► 1.:f <`*�P A --a.. �,a a. SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES Crashes happening on curves Poor Illuminalior rs. 1 „..4,-- MANAGE SPEEDS 6 INSTALL STREET LIGHTING 2 IliD0I C css•rq mprovementsneeded 7 �� Gmiledsightlin ENHANCED CROSSING -r MANAGE TURNS • 3 - Crossing improvements needed `—• STUDY ROUNDABOUT 4 . Turning-related crashes 4_7147 MANAGE TURNS Limited sightlines at intersections(throughout 5 corridor} IMPROVE SIGHTLINES CORRIDOR PROFILE 2 SW Bonita Road . TIT ' f •ti4 • '• R• ,.1 l i • r ,• : r +. 4/44 I ii' , : 1it'Zr' � . 4 41 s;t,,-.':'- Illii 7:- .!,- • '''' 7 1 t ,Ts' \i 4ir., * ' - No . ,. . ..r 4 .4 rr-oi' ', -.7.,--f ;IOW_ . -, ,,,, ?pc .L :,,,:ii‘i ..fr:, r i 6Ai4 7iti. BONITA RD 4k :, ' '... `'DurhamRoad fr,_ i `,: ` . , ; a ' r I' 4 . • Minorlejury• he 0)... .;l ._ �. - r * , ' I n" iY I • PossieleinNuY fk -�`:, ;mo "r ; • :Or d 1 No injury .„L _. .. . ... Project Condor - r-"�-A. T _ . ,.. •P 1;4: . 44t , y _ :, ., ��„ ' Q i High Need Equity Areee SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 35 mph i_x_i !53% 42% -x 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR-END �, FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Arterial X3 42% 42% 1 LENGTH (MILES) ! SERIOUS TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD INJURY 0.56 2 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR t INJURY .S ' riA 43111c NH 21 POSSIBLE 3% 3% 0�/O INTERSECTION MID•BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 37%% 630/O 14 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 2 SW Bonita Road w Q z• 80NITA RD BONITA RD ^ _______.r, — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network © — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network lat Project Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES iiio 37 84% MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • O • 0 - ( : '.: O 8% MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT - '-.; A 1 4) BIKE LANE SIDEWALK PRESENT PRESENT ma�-yy,, 1 8% t' l7 BICYCLE DARK/LIT h O 0% PEDESTRIAN DARK?UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 2 SW Bonita Road ___,. # A NUMBER OF p. I , . , 8 - CRASHES r r I{ TYPE OF CRASH 1 - 'f . -_ it wire r Z j — -A-.2. .� 4 %Iv4 r,l�` ' iliil / �I MOVING _ _ V--' [._ T / 3 VEHICLE � _ �►�` L- � _ ,o , 2 4 14 m-' flit— %V 1 -'''''-Illpir. PEDESTRIAN f 1� 1 !SWBOSTARD1 1J— efq)BICYCLE >w _ SW BONITA RD- jri_. • 0 1` �► Y - 1# 104 II. 1 FIXED OBJECT , —..— 1 1 HEAD ON .1 Lf-ir -, ,7-. , _ REAR END = ,..;- - , 41 , ANGLE 3 I S. i TURNING ' t 1 pY MOVEMENT SIDESWIPE + tray'' ' •'V" f ` OUT OF , 1. .r s CONTROL s' . • _ -- TWILIGHT/ -_- - NIGHT TIME SW BQNITA RD __ g Only injury crashes - _ Cr _____ tram 2018 to 2022 - are included in _ ,.' • diagrams Data is .- Cii,. - sourced from ODOT r 4 V1 in_ , f • V1 CORRIDOR PROFILE 2 SW Bonita Road y'�• r7M " • •� T''''r"7i 4, .,,..__ ' -- . i . t. ' Fl-':i'irji:g r L +Y :.�+� 4.- 1 ' h _....f !;{I{j a. II It BONITA RDA Durham Air Road 1.'I.44 •r , _ . ' ti : L { • 1 rar fSe i .41111 i la . Y • 4•••*2101 -14,11t- . .. SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 IIIIIIII� Crossing improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING 2 im More warning needed before signals SIGNAL VISIBILITY 3 Turning-related crashes 1 4 Nr( ' MANAGE TURNS ` Speeding concerns 4 # � MANAGE SPEEDS Tu rashes 5 rE CO INTERSECTION CONTROL CORRIDOR PROFILE 3 SW Cascade Avenue 10 ti,..1 , ,-, , . -...esratt r.',i ‘.ki' 4,44, , .7:-. _Pw.1-,;----- ..,,,,,-7-7;x7 . -) . " 4 ,f5v,„ Ao•••.* '-' ! , •.`"It—="- . *--1 ..1 ,t: 1 •.-..,,-Mt„ ' 9'41frli 11 , ' 116,4 - 1'‘.4. ,''';' ' ---- 4"I. ims_1; % R�� NIM9 + 1,..:,.;* .i''.,i. �l 4 J % `.. LOCUST1ST o�S ' ' �e� • (s. . or �.L ,, �, rtz • . 1 • f dms^at „►. X�..• m yr' ► jaw • " > —�t ►- j . z° _ �' .� *)S • ��v� Z '4;111 . 0 e -PI !ilk,,,,. ' 4w. At......,;,A - A.,t4i. '''' 'zi ii1;_,-- . -, - 4,L ,,, ...,._ - - -",, cauluz - I t • L .A rL�t �r1�� it M_ 4. _' < . (r1lS.%•tivy 4 ► .` r „ , `• 1 4,... • t .`�, Greenbwg Rood/North 7igard� � .. — Prgect Camece NA- .4 i • C i w s, • •r , ', �Iq cr 1 - -c - rh o Naed Nor,tiers mia SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 30 mph ,X3 33% #-X-I 33% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS ANGLE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Collector 33% 2 O 4 -*x 0DI /ARD TRAFFICCONTROL SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) REAR END SREG CO O INJURY 0.75 - 6 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY POSSIBLE 0% 7% O%/O INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 67% 33% 6 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 3 SW Cascade Avenue \\I: EF.°C° NNIMBps LOCUST�ST r SGNC`�S m \ a45 c � m J Q I Q c z a I V N — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network Amid — . Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network !N _` t. Project Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND �� ��% PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 0 k M3OTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • © O 0 4 /0C.4% • MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK k0 19% PRESENT BICYCLE DARK/LIT I 0 0% PEDESTRIAN DARK'UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE II SW Cascade Avenue NUMBER OF 'T.. . „. - / ( 1, " / CRASHES �Q % rr: l TYPE OF CRASH -• /4' Q 1t / A Q` -' t ♦♦ �� V MOVING 4 ( �` / DSO VEHICLE a y I.-- . �r3► PEDESTRIAN ' r' �� `O( . /�f BICYCLE \ fJ sw �` ,� * '� > O / ; //' moo AVEcitts , r��/ f. FIXED OBJECT \: / / A, v� • 2O ��� 41, ---\\ 411244' HEAD ON i/ 4 ir i,. tir .4t, N:ka //../ .,.',, -,s0 t. s" :r'41 , r\I I,- li,,.. REAR END y1 // r / •o . ANGLE l i 4//". • 1 ,/ -gip`[ 0. /. ' ,..„. , tI.I6"_ _ 4. '0.;,. TURNING • • ,�� MOVEMENT i -Ns. - O " SIDESWIPE ..., / / /‹.-. _ OUT OF F \ `1 r CONTROL rt TWILIGHT! f , \ { `S('90 /' • NIGHT TIME i i r j L ~ CRASH ` 1 . -•F' L-' q 1 Only injury crashes ` from 2018 to 2022 ,/�f y 1 � / are included in . • • diagrams.Data is sourced from ODOT -'5 e CORRIDOR PROFILE 3 SW Cascade Avenue - rts/ s 11©©13 t:a:, .� ,a - •', ;.!� IV 3, ,;111b %il,' '...4.-. _. • . °dr 4.....-:! , 1. Ro �►►*� ol'$ ;, /11. pi itil::.c. , 0- ).,_. 'i�klMB�, ir ss , 7.1 i tiO. I T- 0 4- IFI''�in r y .ali ;41 r II Aa t.�H I'elk f''`- _.-- -Ai,..,..-.. ,. uVI II ' �Y 7. �� ICJ --1 , 4 11 11' mt.. �. S �r T 'a sdp • b' r'..: ' ' . , 1 11 Greenbu g Rood/North'Tigard * -.,, . , ''•Tr: i, N . c _ i-s >r '•:�.04 r . t SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES More warning needed before srgna s Poor Illumination 6 (IP i iiiiii SIGNAL VISIBILITY INSTALL STREET LIGHTING 2 lr.'i related crashes MANAGE TURNS happening on curves 3 1` S \\{ MANAGE SPEEDS 4 /1111111 Crossing improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING 5 'll'lll' ENHANCIECD CROSSING CORRIDOR PROFILE 4 SW Dartmouth Street �. 'PFAFyFL�E sr --IOW '. y-'i►. r , 71 A Iy K '3'c 1' `_ Irv- .:"' • •• . v-", -Av.-7 ) X L.re •••• : "P r y =j \ y • .. ' ,��/�'_/ 0 L I v4.c♦�. - ,AT_LANIA ST H4,ry�NES ST 3 71) ., % +r ` V ',i :f _J our; sr`' -_ yy �w .., lir . .. , , ,...„.. _ c may/ -11� •• '; i41 t 'i' ft Y. P 4 - �.• -y��Y' 7 t/ f _SFr - nA ; i� x •�. • . z' :�',r8�=''.-'X.a k. ��+e.0 ... r �a is ,, '1r 4 • ' ' . ' _ , - '',1' I ._: .-404....: 1 , .,•' - - _�. . Serious irjury `� W * ". a - rMinor trr ury I hh 4 �'`}. � '_ VL,.— . PossIbie injury ' , i•.i,,,4—, • oormp c-f e o - No�njury _ ur„�. • •- — W- Project Cornea( r _ _ 'al_ ` ♦.. ---- •r"'� _ High Need Equity Areas SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 25-35 mph x3 47% 40% 0 I FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Collector O 20% �x 23 /o F-x� ; SERIOUSLENGTH (MILES) REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE INJURY 0.75 12 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR INJURY 0el% % 3111 AN 31 POSSIBLE 00/0 50/0 00/0 INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 55% 45% 41 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 4 SW Dartmouth Street PFAFFIEyST ZI I 9L T ,ATLANTA ST i_i:HAINES S1 A",AArA ST 217 - r x a . Z 217 TigarEnEOrk ed High Enjury Partnai\\\' N."''' Tigar 1RryDurk sr Partner owned Systemic Safety Network N \ ---„_____, _ aok Project Corridor I CRASHES BY MODE I ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND iR84 85p/p PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ioMOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • O • 0 A: • 0 6% MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT BIKE LANE SIDEWALK • • 8p/p PRESENT PRESENT rt-• r BICYCLE DARKrLIT is Mom. i1 1% el PEDESTRIAN DARKCUNLIT 00�0 UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 4 SW Dartmouth Street NUMBER OF i� .. y - k _ ` . II, gam' CRASHES -4'-' '-'' �'` I, ] ' II s TYPE OF CRASH ,`\. //1 R �`Y ,ce( -,y�� MOVING r _; G�' . .. VEHICLE ` 2 O ��� PG PEDESTRIAN _ • . - - \i'viec..31 •,.. , • BICYCLE . - ,'T r' �� a. ❑ 4 T FIXED OBJECT .,- -7 `� —♦}--�—� �. ,t" r , HEAD ON ' / /Sri,-'\' \ \, � / / 4 ',N 1' 0.. V::' SW DARTMOUTH ST REAR END ANGLE • _ - Y ,/� G li .7..;\ ' '.'. 'I k ' TURNING / 1f� MOVEMENT r r''r' SIDESWIPE 1 „IN -Ag l . t , ` Q �, _ OUT OF 9 ,fir•, ��_4 I CONTROL TWILI lil NIGHT HT/TIME SIN ATLANTA ST "� NIGHT TIME CRASH '-. 1 - 18 �' - Only injury crashes 1 Q 1 - ]_ from 2018 to 2022 , ., .I _ ....... :G...Via. e. , A��M /� - S., i w- are included in 1r�' S.�t �`` 21 - .. diagrams.Data is �lv 9 —�T t 1, ..� ;� �� 1 Sourced from ODOT 3El —_ it :� .j jk.-?\ c r ■7f _J .I i IN o f Y CORRIDOR PROFILE 4 SW Dartmouth Street PfAME'ST ►nT _11 � • ' " }ATLANTA Sr . ' r y r i' tO Y _ ? a " - rgardT •ft 12 j I A-Z.0 r 7-:----77 ir i• L7 It. i <• ti w • W 5. ! '..,y'' 1v iits- +„40 0qR e .`4 t ♦ ''' .I TMOUTy� EI© - -- .� . 1 - �_ SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 im More warning needed before signals SIGNAL VISIBILITY 2 lilililil Crossing improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING 3 11111111 Crossing improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING 4 . Limited sightlines at intersections IMPROVE SIGHTLINES 5 Turning-related crashes MANAGE TURNS CORRIDOR PROFILE 5 SW Durham Road 1-4-- .t f - it'.Durham Road _" • • - "*"•v- ?. .-� . —� .• • -r-.o .' $4 .. DURHAMCD,- 4"--. ._ y , • ,..-..tiar, ,'.`, i ._" ,iM' •!Y!♦�(� . —1- .ems 4i - .'i I`_ 1. ;. r r ti, ' . ..,.'.,,* CS -'� ' 1,- . .. _4,77, rf, , 4„ts, _ _ , .. I . , # t___. .... 4.0. ,,,..; • .\`‘-- -: IL-4. .4 At__A,,,,,A•c- ' ' " ' , A • •.- r*4 to w i ;dr I, i r� e L L . t , . 4..j ♦r!� # P s.�y '._r• 41. .`. - y i ` ► _ ^, `.t.. w�n .�� a I h �, _ •,.1.�A .�.i 'Z. :. I. • Seraus Injury - -j. ,�'f— 1 irLea i11 ` +' � - s SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH 35 mph _ SEVERITY 71% 59°/O FUNCTIONAL CLASS �� REAR-END =', ��� FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Arterial - 20% 14% 2 x SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD INJURY 0.63 - - -- - 15 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY Q ^ � :Cc NH 24 POSSIBLE 1% 4°/O 1°/O INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 39% 61% 29 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 5 SW Durham Road DURHAM RD OG� No 'PO — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network 40 Project Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND 40A �� +7�/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES , MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • O 71,116, • A • . ilk MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT BIKE LANE SIDEWALK • 0/ PRESENT PRESENT 1 30 �_• C� BICYCLE DARK1IT ,. 1 3% PEDESTRIAN DARK UNLIT O% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 5 SW Durham Road Ili t--,,,-iii- , 41-1 .....,•.. . Ny• ''''1.- P NUMBER OF P' --zr CRASHES L7 1 -... ,N Z "li i ,•- - • Cr .Z.' TYPE OF CRASH < • . _, „.• a% _. r...- . .:- - al A... CD .. --- - . . .—- _ 7 . MOVING , Ct , , -S- VEHICLE < . , k..J Xi ! 0 t 4 SW DURHAM RD --••, ,_ - - PEDESTRIAN - - _.......-- 1 i --- • - 4.-. .,,... . Pe 2 T lit P 4 Ok• 1 2L---) BICYCLE MI NJ , .4 D SW DURHAM RD I f FIXED OBJECT iVIIIVIIIi147,*' -e..- HEAD ON I - REAR END /.. ANGLE V / TURNING . '‹Z' 4/4 Aq P10'' ,.. 1:///: MOVEMENT . , 1\ vi 1 -10 - , - -- • 4•; \ -// Ott .SIDESWIPE :...,,,, 4.,:.:s . 4 i cif.i .,, - . rrcrcrb `,......, •.... 41410 .• --„1// t . • 44„...\.' OUT OF r ,, . . ,- ( , ... CONTROL 2 . •••• TWILIGHT/ , NIGHT TIME -..„ /, . CRASH t$ --", ' • , , , 2 P `.• ._ , Only injury crashes . . -„,,,.. •• iie‘‹ from 2018 to 2022 •- --•,_ - 1 are included in • - - - diagrams.Data us ,,_0 , --it sourced from ODOT 1 .- - /V ... ‘7". .•' :.-, r ,,r ..' CORRIDOR PROFILE 5 SW Durham Road , ! • �� '` Durham Rood " ] , ' 4t..14: . b a, DURHAM'� a' t 40 : ^ f. • • -' aIii r t ° ) . + -:.'r- ' ' C4'..71. e i ,- ': P'',0. ,in, ... ' ' ,_, ," .. '''W 7....lir . 40r. ,4 -. ,P, 1 lki v - 0. t ...t;AineoliH , 11- ii,1 - . . ,,, ...•'',,,.. ' - /-0 • m 4440;N:-., 00, - - if ,• A***11.1 -„,-._.,- . ,-, ,...., I -sir ♦ •• - ,' .t =* Y y . �°Y '< ,... v. .., ,. ._ _. ..L. _ :•r V p t:.4 - "•-. '", -7,- 1 _.,..'... ; 0. 1pr - 4r ' tlair '6A.Q�EA 0'l.�. a ,. I . t b •..i�timilli 5. 11‘ 014 �- • 9� SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 11111411 More wammg needed before signals SIGNAL VISIBILITY Crossing improvements 2 /1111111 ENHANCED CROSSING needed CORRIDOR PROFILE 6 SW Hunziker Road \ S f ;ti' elk "' ' 1r" ��IMMy_ y 'I" lit .! .4., - ".' �. i" µ_ , me• t _ ` t� -' L: •- ,A !� `ern � 7H. .. C•. �� . i, ;�. k, A r, JMI " ram_-'�l,_ Fr _� r �:` � ,..• ' Jr , � Tigard Triangle r } 1'? 7 1' A,ilk ' , . _ " it, f now .} _ N. `•`� f . kFR� HAMPTON 5! - \0,1' a lilt • Senous kdrury „.. I �".0, ..t.1 VIM -. .i. .,,,.� -.. .. 7' F; - ��1 I 1 POSSiOtB lflN+Y . . . .4 , .,, ,... . II- ipkvi, _ .1 , I f ' �1.4.; -- . .! _ - '. /-� aK 1 �'�O^wry N•3��,'--r 7 - lil '-�i'`{�� `i . . z _. pro ect Corndwt_`: • ' iss ' ' •'.+� ` lii00.11ilk, x,`�! .. '' �_• Nigh Heed[gutty Areas rlsTair r.. ?P°Illiillt SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 35 mph ->x 31% i-x� 23% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR-END 1 FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Collector x 31% �� 23% 1 LENGTH (MILES) U r TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD SERIOUS 0 INJURY 0.73 - 0 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY 'S ' "IA 411 31111: nu 7 POSSIBLE 0% 0% 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG• 31% 69% 5 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 6 SW Hunziker Road a> w�>s m\ .co)L11444s444N47044144144406.0014\ i eP. x k4Ro2H A MP,ON ST byTigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network �- Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network • © I - Project Corridor •• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND ^, �+ 100% PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES -r�,�, MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • © • O 4"61, oO�o0 1 MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT e)% NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK o 0% PRESENT l.7 BICYCLE DARK/LIT i 1 % PEDESTRIAN DARK/UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 6 SW Hunziker Road ,., - L ridge Er• ©O,,_ E. J ': s• - �.. . F : 4 '�i - . -�4 * ..fir j 4 - , .4 , 440,1„, . A.. . ,. ilip , r. Ile ' I ."'"' • r• ikj., k-*-_ :----"."- ::,' "•::' :_.'7- 4...,—4',',-- ii: i _ Tigard Triangle y 4� � \ 11p _ • - . V ' N c wi� ,,. ` r ,'1., •\\* . r-< , L_` r�FB}, y ^ i HAMPTONS �;_ ` .I' ' , -: ..,N, tr, - .EI ' -- . ---t.' , 004 k.Ai, , - ._ / )14L i t*" -- - - 4.6 1:4, r .... 1 iN Ma Q. 111„;.-.., ","4 " 4. :•.!' . ,, Alt Ai 1111r •°. SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 /111111/ Crossing improvements nee ENHANCED CROSSING Crashes happening on curves 2 g`j M � \\11 MANAGE SPEEDS 3 �`a` Speeding concerns(throughout corridor) \ MANAGE SPEEDS -X 4 Loa o'continuous pedestrian network 4 III .� ,throughout corridor) FILL SIDEWALK GAPS CORRIDOR PROFILE 7 SW Main Street ` Y r R' r;fir' ,r K.-u Gmenburg Road'North Trgord 4 ' • . ., ` '"r � 4 A� • , M r ► . -i • _ fir_ .a. • 4<?+` - -' S j • ,c4'- ' _ J ► ` ` �! a�� Tigard gh! i,4 l•i._o . .,,. A . „L../ __,, -. e_ ,. ., , . „, " ,.....„ AN. „,,,,, ,,,, , .... _ , _. „, ., ..,,.,. 41. 's ,,- ' * ' • _ •. a r:k . - 1.j'A. • s ." Tom` '-- A 44 4 ry r. i. .t -A. f .,..-v i ,' ♦ Y- J ' a ' . i • Serious Injury {._ -:4%; r+ ��, e�:, �. 1 _ - '�• �'�� ,A „� N. - , iy • Miner injury '`. -. - •_ `AownfONm ..F,A.�.G9 - • - �, / _ • Possible Injury `�� a -r r .fie .�. . . .- No,., by - ,• t rf�� • i 1 , ` ` A,J - 9?� - M „ No Injury �; t= �• t _ _ _a. .'� S���R-�/' ` r — Protect Condor b '� _, rs --i; ,. ., N'.'l •I t ,�1 c High Need ECuitY Areas SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 20 mph ->x 39% I-x-1 43% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR•END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Collector 3 17°/O • it 13% SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) �� SIDESWIPE OTHER -- - -- -- INJURY 0.54 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY 'S ' "k 411 :Inc in 7 POSSIBLE 9°/O 0°/O 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 70% 30°/O 11 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 7 SW Main Street >,ys f0* \. lif co — Tigard-owned High njury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network 60 — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network -P ytiy — Partner awned Systemic Safety Network f s� Project Corndar ••• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 0 044 20 78% MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT ilk 4 /0 O 065b. 43 • 0 MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK k 0 17O/O PRESENT BICYCLE DARK/LIT 1 3 0% /1 PEDESTRIAN DARK UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE al SW Main Street # -,..,„ . .• ., _ - JF ' . 1 ..._ _ .W, ....... . NUMBER OF 'X. A . AL,- , di,i, CRASHES ,,,, -7. • - ' -t \ -' - >' 05 64, • -, ../ TYPE OF CRASH ,-- MOVING t.,A, ' ' _. _----.0 - • ,lik- '1114111tjafi" s ". PEDESTRIAN , liWi' erte t: • 401t- . ,• \ •ic,,... itk() BICYCLE A 1 .tr . S C - - ' \116--..\ • • , ii .. ,s. 0 •- . cA - 4.01 , AXED OBJECT Nc Nomo.• —44— HEAD ON , .., ., -. . , -- 4 _ REAR END ,qs? --- ....... /..-. ....-/- ANGLE ` *. C. ...------'-'---- ...„ 17 . TURNING ei - ...-• 2 -, MOVEMENT . .../ Ul --k ril,,,' , .• SIDESWIPE 1..lut.1• OUT OF ,_ zt, . - II% CONTROL WS <'( . i/ <.'(-• \ x e• 4 1 ,ri, `,-; TWILIGHT/ ,••!I Alk. ,,,,. 4/ . NIGHT TIME CRASH „I..N. . 1 ^f, .r." Only injury crashes from 2018 to 2022 It )t 1 ' ..',are included in • diagrams.Data is 'N• sourced from ODOT .. , irj. , 47 - • CORRIDOR PROFILE 7 SW Main Street .,-..: . *A.:I-. ..' '.. , ,,,,;:li, . ,., , ., 0 El ireenburg Rood/Northg:3 ..j., _,- ...'"Z: 1 - ,,•'7, '-- U 13 1 L - ,,.'I,1#4I•4•1/4r':„1.'4.4%'-r0,ty.1t4,1.—#-'.•i..4.4..M,t-..'t,.1M1t.I....1'k...:k4.'t.,.i,.4.i1.N.;..,,:i..4o'a2:,,. ,,'',:a..'.,X., 4•4,--1.re•q..'•;/-•,.,V 0.:..::t.,-.4,:..%A-z.:7....r.1'.4 4".:-,,.i'',',''.V,y.r.,_t•A1-i/..N„.bF1,,r.,-;•4*..''''',•,,4.t,,--•. • . . . '1;0 i1g t._•r1._'-A...- '',\7-‘---,0'v-'*•l 4A>,$4_"l.,,' '4'.4Vl-i'•k--k','.:,'.. - 1_.8.1;1. ck/.:,•' , l : * -- Tigard'T:)ri,a,0n,,.g•-.. l', e ' 4 . " 4 " , -d. * P vireo ...... . , . - . . .c. ., ,. , .: ,,.,# - - .‘' ,, . . 171 r"V ,IL- , - \/. •' ii . ,.. CtilliOp 7, ,-s _ . t N ,v, •,z, ....,.., .--_-1,_ .III . 7 •„. 1, - -.• -, 64 N. • , -• SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES More warning needed before signals 1 'IN SIGNAL VISIBILITY 2 11111111 Crossing improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING =°t 1/4 ,, uming-related crashes 3 47147 MANAGE TURNS CORRIDOR PROFILE 8 SW Royalty Parkway/SW 109th Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane . . _ •-, 7* , I 1 .- . I , . ' „,....fiC iii-...7,;1",.T- iis'4,' in . ..•-41:0146.'7.,•••-..,t1.,..•.. . :,.,,„.. .,. ...„.. .. ..11.,-, , , „ -„...4: .7i.1, - - #.c_'.. -t's - ,.z..r . .,... . ,r, A .,,, • ' .. EP .4"'•.1....• . } , , ., a, t. . # . 1 fit...4,.. ' . -;C 4t ilL;-1' li111.''.„. 4;:i',Iiikciii,.._ . . !"9?,.,' 4 7 • k''L-'• t_ - r'-‘ O.' 4.1i: • • 4 . I.- _ ,II,„ . „470,6 4 t.,.A.I.II '4.- . II ' ' "q" . . )'.':\i- 4 . •r,--, ,,- ,r_01141.41- - , ...„ ' ;40-1 i 1 14. ,-,,....--11., ,4. ,--,..00.. ri z, i i•„4" • •,:i : -7 ,2 ,_t.,„ilt.T 1,.:3•8. ...._ 4: ..,...-_,, A Ada , ,, .., J, 4 7. ;-1, • . ' 1 " .-1: --"Le- --. ,,,,„.4.. --i,itt . Jr. , ,J. .0 '170 _ , ; ..'1:-0.'..,./ - • .••• 1 .4'1!71111."''111'-'4 - 41."...;r4' i .44. . .,.4.-.." 41;-.4 :.?1 .,i • , .-,..7/. .:I',i• .... . 1,7%0 A r. a ..„:•..‘. 4' • .t V. t .1r ;Ob. ...'4-,.7: - 7.... '4 IF ' 'cemMOUN 7 AIN Rj")' ..--- - .0 .i... ..,‘.. - ,.n .... : ., ,,, ,._ +,r. ."..4 ,,4kSk -1"A 4e.,.• , •‘,. r-, 4/ .*,1 :..tt.ilY,,,,,,,,-.. .. k I..!'' . 4'..41;1. 1 I. *6..:Ci. f.110"4*--'" .. 47.;"1'...., 1.,4 A....,,....A I..,• 2'': l'i:4.-;."141! :„ .../., _ L._... N....-.1:' ..:::::-"".*11.".-!1:4. —14114%. . -"I 4""S'artillif. ; IP' r.: ".;.:.' ••'.4 0°1$1' 4.* -'-'i.''r' (' ' .r'4'. fr. ....ek1.......,4„...... - - . — .,•,.. , ... . --. 1)4_5. ...A . 104' • Olt .$..t. . r' '•I''. 1!.:''r >. At';‘41 ed.' 4' '. k If! _- .;•,-,4‘-'b...;','- 'A - ' '':.' .:. '' ' 4.414''::44-144. . ‘-'''•- 'v. .eti "."-'; _'/ ' _ \,, ' '.', •s " 44.7 - ':.'. 4;1 1.,' ' .'C' •"%g-.7 ;.-i '' ,..11. i.111.4, 43.,, - g... • • 7-' it'--#.- - •' • ;.,,, ..,. ._t: SOuthview• •- -.4 y; ' '' -,4 1• • • e. -. „,, - 8,- . rip * A. ft',‘ .A . %e't-' .. - - ' .. . . . .,- • y_.-. . .• • . Olie,41;c4;‘• '': '. - i.r, , • 47.7' . : • ' •-7 -'11 -• - - ,.0(0...,, P;i '.‘;`r.e.:r AL • - -:a. -,fir;ti - -.- --,•,: _,, ., , ,••-,5'4:.k..:_.,.'• ,- .', : ,.., „.,,t,s.v ,,,..-::,,,,,:,,,'.: ..,,,- , ,,, , • . , .,:- • .046.3/3, “.....1 ..„ ,..-,.. • I.-..r1 -''''. ';:r..1/ h4TV i, -.4- - -.:.. r ;7 , ' *4. 04, , - 3'" Serious Injury .,.* f4,,_. .--4 ;.,, '.. .... ..t 1147;'• k . - ititi_ "If%,... , -.,-.•... :.•- •.•,... 1, ,. ..,„-- • --- .4.-. ..-4,. ,..0.,...:, - . -16 ,, ict..,, •..4, .-....,..:4 , • Mew InJury ,*, . .-4,"' ,., 4- •'*-- ' r!--:.* '4•...,'4 7.' r .'P''. ' - ` .,. Ntr., , , '' '*".--Ari .......11 itt... Posstre injury .1 11-1, 1-4,',., ,:, • f - r. ir '-Vjr 1,,t,i'v.., . .1'•..:.0../, ; • i" IMIII s ,_ 4,, ,.., .4 4,,,,jp_ ., . - , • . . ••• No Ivry ' , N ; :-.- ..,- ,,, , :.It. , :-. . .m.,....v. . • :,.5-4; . ..... ,,,. , — Project Corridor .-.. .•0 ,"t$1.1"1-.. . ' . .t, ''''1 a. •P :: , '''',..."":.; ' 4:rr.,:'::;t% ; High Need Equdy Areas j 42, - '-'.- ,'.N ,- -''' ' '' ''' geartilnarlitlairilii 44;4 SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 20-25 mph —x 45% 0 2 T/0 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Neighborhood ..... 1 LENGTH (MILES -->x 19CY0 REAR•END 23% DISREGARD TRAFFIC CONTROL SERIOUS INJURY 0.91 8 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR litaillo . 3111: INJURY 'S ` rYt 4, • Nil 11 POSSIBLE 3% 10°/0 0`)/0 INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 68°/O 32% 11 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 8 SW Royalty Parkway/SW 109th Ave n u e/SW Canterbury Lane .,\ BULL MOUNTAIN RD AP /s ,I F e I High Injury Network F g�0 RO 011 i Panne owed High Injury Network 0�� ilt , Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network / �� Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network © Project Corridor I ••• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND +� 65% PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT � © • 0 Abipk% .. • 0 10% , 14.71%.:., MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK 0 23% PRESENT r -i- BICYCLE DARK/LIT i2 3% PEDESTRIAN DARK'UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 8 SW Royalty Parkway/SW 109th Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane NUMBER O F `0 t • - .. f r . tw.: flr .� CRASHES 4:-P", r ff - '' Y F f .TYPE OF CRASH Is . �j w' F ' MOVING /• f 4 / - s VEHICLE I /' y 1 r ._ , PEDESTRIAN a CNO e ''' r7ir ...... 1 . BICYCLE 111111 cr ❑ .: 1.. . FIXED OBJECT (1 "-_ ' - - .'4 4.. �� 2 O SO/ • ~ HEAD ON ' ROYl L '- _ ' r 3 ' �'°KW V c� 1 r. REAR END Ci * ‘ .'' :. i e i CI S` ANGLE r'ft Cr J w44 O�4 TURNING f 1 Q ... � Q• � p�tt MOVEMENT ��' 4 P 11 Q rvtr ar SIDESWIPE t w . OUT OF - ., .1 )irlarill CONTROL yP�c.!QIL44 TWILIGHT! f NIGHT TIME • • ./ 1 ❑ ,_ti. :„ � CRASH f i - �; •• • ' SW MURDOCK ST Only injury Cr85he5 t. , r, from 2018 to 2022 y - - are mcfuded in • - , diagrams Data is 1 9" i •�. �..s sourced from ODOT L j'' S� �, it ' ' F 1 A, CORRIDOR PROFILE 8 SW Royalty Parkway/SW 109th Avenue/SW Canterbury Lane n, .1 .. 4 i I" vFy1l ,'h. ,ter it—ir . r` t °r jj O •! y" Via: y .r 44" - T - r _?l, a.s ri "' f/� �91Y-°� 4. * yi 4 ti•ti e `' ,.„I �•�v -. 4 N' MOUNTAI1. tom- -— j. ' :this i_ �r -'.' ! • " _..4,,,,. :11:l' ' .* ; , r. -: •r:":It. ,, -' 1._+y��•, '.•y�f h ,•'' - 1 _• .�, r f 1" , r�t1 0. �+i y i.Y•}Y 'r^ y ,- r } � '.�_. ,F er 41 • '�� "'1 �r� s• fl •1 6'�t \. ;/.�a_a'�V. _../3�. ,1• • 'x t 4 &; � 4- a f -�:tea y. , � t.r -� • :: ( • _ :1 1".. tip ��. .A..�•< #•" ,+;,•ti tt i r 1 1. • Y CC • f t: N I :.'L 641 ST . '''...4%./‘'''':'1: ..L'-''''.. 1.4ti- :-''''-'1---.7. :47') •fl.''. •-...171-- t- .k:•::-:..**;,,-.1;:-P'..:"3'::,...11.'1-..:-4'- --0,-..; SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES IINI More wa•ping seeded before signals 6 ` Turning-related crashes SIGNAL VISIBILITY 471 474. MANAGE TURNS 2 'lllll1l1 C c4srg improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING 3 FIN More warning needed before signals SIGNAL VISIBILITY 4 I 111111 I Crossing ENHANCED CROSSING 5 �j; — Crashes with fixed objects A MOVE FIXED OBJECT CORRIDOR PROFILE 9 SW 72nd Avenue (South Segment) Downtown �_ ; - -,-.,"' . -v7., . , ,o4,-.4. -' .74,„ 6 4,........ ... . , ., tii ,(,.„. ,, tio, .., 1,,- .i,.. _ 4, ;`4/- Y f i.,`"it `t n , "s1- 4 -- '�,.,t •-j. a2-11M: F • ; �_•,� •"i ` t ' j:'fit 94 _ �., is •-•• ;__.•,:,...,_ w ~�; y , •_ - vef.y~MCDONAL'D� s �`„ t.+ t+" Y • *•. r "_ .*t2k �r" nt I 5 R ? - .;A, ,. .'K. to: t� ` 'ck.. _ F ....•� • Minor aury, - � •, !, ti t' '� ® lI Possible envy • : No Ireury A s� - 1 rY�..: Y 7 .` iv, -., •t r'1 i, BONITA : I — Project Cornea w• r ., � �:}(: ( �' •.: . Ut. ?'. - 'p _,,Durham Road ' -.•-.: - . _ • ,A !t . m• I High Need E7 Areas SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH 30-35 mph —x 59% - SEVERITY ' 44% o FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT , FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Arterial v 28% 22% LENGTH (MILES) �^ REAR-END r^� SERIOUS FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE INJURY 0.72 — - 4 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY tip , IIII 11 POSSIBLE 6% 6 % O%/O INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK ""URY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 78% 22% 16 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 9 SW 72nd Avenue (South Segment) . f • Y e f.tom. 0 o • TECH CENTER DR on rti r�MCDONgLD_ST� a�, , 4„( ++Y t - 1 — Tigard-owned High Infury Network Partner-owned High Intury Network I — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network i Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network i © t� Project Corridor BONITA RD ••• Speed Concern Carndor 1 CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND iii., 31 720/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT ") • O 99O 67"0 A MOTORCYCLE TWILIIIGHT NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK 190' PRESENT iii 1 0 BICYCLE DARK/LIT 0 1r O 0% PEDESTRIAN DARK UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 9 SW 72nd Avenue (South Segment) NUMBER OF 111 + CRASHES Qr Y r , 3; ❑ ?'f ' TYPE OF CRASH _ +� 4 ry i 1t MOVING VEHICLE fn r PEDESTRIAN r'''. r ' -— ,111-4 BICYCLE HWY 217 RAMS_ 1 =- � V D ED OBJECT SW VARNS ST tO s i_.._ J , HEAD ON • vY . ♦L20 ` REAR END ♦ r T r ANGLE . 'ti l it TURNING - • MOVEMENT r. 3 'ii‘ - ,- SIDESWIPE � _S tr . _ . .... OUT OF -r CONTROL 1- t . -i .fir •i, c �s111%1 • 4 ' , i TWILIGHT/ it -"' NIGHT TIME CRASH i -� • • • i } SW",A• Only injury crashes , - from 2018 to 2022 I a 2 44 are included in _ - r .- p diagrams.Data is { • ' sourced from ODOT - CORRIDOR PROFILE 9 SW 72nd Avenue (South Segment) x. . -ice Downtown � ,- .• • , ,� yF c`mil;:'. '. ii,lipt.i...: * il*.Aella Ajklik", .' ,f••:. 4 . .°X AtAltt••:\,' )L d1't i 'j. w,' 0*_ n. a I' IF T"r•;71:► . •„. _sue.RI 'r� r� z. !4-.' -•». TECH �• ©, j 17„1, , ,Jr (27 :4.41MCDONAL'D�. ....:14,.. -- s, • z. . \ 1 ..x w, 1 9s rl_ '` �a —u �? r AI ;v ► I t.;;;1;1,•-! '` R`w Durham Road, ' `a r .. .9- 0©© r-.� SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 ` Turning-related crashes 6 11111111 I1III11 c'ossigImprovements needed +71 r'4 MANAGE TURNS ENHANCED CROSSING More warning needed before signals7 CO Potential for wrong-way driving 2 SIGNAL VISIBILITY PREVENT WRONG-WAY DRIVING 3 I 11111 II' Crossing improvements needed 8 � iv.,.9-related crashes ENHANCED CROSSING .i.4 ( , MANAGE TURNS Crossing improvements 4 111111111 ENHANCED CROSSING needed 5 zgEg Missing pavement markings //Min ENHANCED PAVEMENT MARKINGS CORRIDOR PROFILE 10 SW Greenburg Road (South Segment) • . r •'P' i•-'' -1,r ' - ' i-k. 11 7'.'4rfA„‘ 4 . %-sw ,.:* iiL-., - - - °.. ' . '-II It' 1- itjj .*- 4.. ...,,,,.- - 'P y'!1,-Ae.:4- r7;:.'d',C.-- - *-- .-- •4„ •' i'...,:,., 'r. ,i -... .t .:474::„.1111, a .4"i r 4.,_,,,,. :•., -0,.. . . . : r .< ' `.tki f I 4 ' -. '.' '4' ir":" ; t-61:4;i':-' f 1 . ‘. e4--'._ r•,'..- -.- - ' - '-at, .,. ' .,-' , H .v..„, ....* _,.--...,_,. _ •,. ,1 ,f_......:- , .-ji—jk • ,�1. ,GfefrnbnrgRoad/Northt `' ', 2, ~ � ti �' +' a• t �4 J 'ir • ��d(' — L� 4 fm L 14 xlsr. ••:., , +1;4.-, - .,'S,.. .. o, . w-r_ -,-. i• _ ~; ra`4'.''4.c- . �� ; ei‘„\.„..„,_ ' °:• 1tAt'.!',,--tea'it. `cYl N ■ 'c ' + ,,WC Y i .Y. _-.-} \: •. • Serious Injury „' 41,.,.A„, I..7.. \ .. •+d n. ,r'� v,,' - . _ - 44. ri 6 a ®,t 'i44.Tryon • Mvwrin,ury t -� .. -. a . -• • ✓ �. lei High Need EdurtYluees SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 35 mph x 35% FX-i ` ! 29% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Arterial 33% rid.) 27 /O O 3 —>XSERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) REAR-ENDFAILURE TO YIELD INJURY 1.07 -- 26 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR INJURY ri% 41111 43: Nil 27 POSSIBLE 6% 50/O 00/O INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 68% 32% 28 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 10 SW Greenburg Road (South Segment) AEI LE;A tee 1 ---/ - wt o s t '..I 217 4 It. .�PWFLE.ST G.9FFNeu„ RD - 4 ° Tigard-owned High Injury Network ti — Partner-owned High Injury Network �' �� Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network © Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network 4. Project Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND 80 ��O/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 0 MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT Olt. O • O O • 0 4 /o MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT )k BIKE LANE SIDEWALKESENT • � 190/O PRESENT PR Olt BICYCLE DARK/LIT h 1 1% PEDESTRIAN DARK"UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 1° SW Greenburg Road (South Segment) NUMBER OF + _ ? J ,4 CRASHES y` #.� O CI TYPE OF CRASH JO�� , 43 \, 1 </„ -2- VEHICLE A it . \ 3 )1 a\ 0) .°6.'c. 1.4- , %1 CI PEDESTRIAN a. v � Ojv BICYCLE J�C� SW SHADY LN �—, H"V 2/Z pN ��� € s ❑ AMP �<c, Q. FIXED OBJECT V Sµ �� c) 1 �W Nod P 51 HEAD ON / �� DPK� re, REAR END - G 1 ANGLE Q f •�. 7 . 'A Q a ... A i_ _ TURNING 4 f jMOVEMENT ' rn �,-+ r • p r NG.;EF i SIDESWIPE- Sw GRE�N$(J RO® � ye(� ` • �y �•OUT OF Z ?CEO �. <c 2 CONTROL z 1 TWILIGHT/ S�it`�` NIGHT TIME :,4+ CRASH �CiQ� \i---\ `' ,f F-6 2 1) Only injury crashes ` from 2018 to 2022 fie C are included in �1 .r0 , diagrams.Data is l .;\ sourced from ODOT. CORRIDOR PROFILE 10 SW Greenburg Road (South Segment) % Trrt, r-r-+ Py I ,, *'• :. , , r,;iRF.. 2 �j +1 ri:.,- f-,N e`•- 7,."..,,-*-;,e,,N-i. .•' gip.*, ,.• . _ to - i.i , _.�!` i• '''"`• t , -0 -• 2' ,ram ' b -;t ♦ '+ r.• '" J : .._,,:2. - i1_.A.1,_.P:/,,. - . -'i 4)- ' ';' - 4 - lg 4 " Ot !:..-‘'+ 7t 41' . . -, :, -.• 4:: --' • • froC.--IC .i':- liatu..: - I 4 ,,' d its * U 8 .- r , E=i ~• ' '• �: . ,PIS._1 J �;R ems._.. �J[ r k '� -,Greenburg i.. _ +9'♦ y .y` iii t y t a 9RE" - + CGii1l �� , 1'Y . - 7- ,-i.'W..i 1i..r.r.,:1..t1r,1 6 1 ',a1.-.i.4.S,a,—..t...i.,,,z3CeUr eP,t ` .` i' !��_'I `• ti _p .' : ;+f4;ik `� Tigard Triangle .i 4rP l . 1 ' . 4 ; ' R ,I 216,E C _` .,, SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 41 li IIIIIP Potential for wrong-way wrong-way drivingCrossin improvements neared Unsafe or Unmarked Turns PREVENT WRONG WAY DRIVING 111111111 ENHANCED CROSSING 11 LANE STRIPING 2 111111 More warning needed before signals t Many conflict points 12 11111111 Crossing improvements needed SIGNAL VISIBILITY `r MANAGE TURNS ENHANCED CROSSING Wide intersection with overlapping conflicts -r Crossing improvements neexd Unsafe or unmarked turns 3 LANE STRIPING IIIIIII ENHANCED CROSSING 13 IMPROVE SIGHTLINES 4 111111111 Crossing improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING 111111111 Crossin improvements needed g ENHANCED CROSSING 5 I I I I I I I I' Crossing improvements needed 10 11111111 Crossing improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING ENHANCED CROSSING CORRIDOR PROFILE 11 SW Walnut Street (East Segment) :.tom ._ - - ♦, .. \ . .• + aim , �' �. y_ s'• ` ` • "�tOQ aft • mil • \ � ''^ - r � f- • tic � d'. � �•`. }1 Th , 14.6k. 3.,41.0. •ram'! _ �� , • i ^*` i Serious injury ' r7 ck� +• _w M i. i :� ♦*`.• \ _ . -� - rT `�Y ?It, ,, Minor Injury IA- 141'it }: •- 4�• �� - v _ • PossideInjury No injury • • t B••.• - -I ^ �• • , High Need NI"kees SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH 30 m h r 38% SEVERITY p 4x 0 43% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR-END FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Arterial 333 LL 1 LENGTH (MILES) � TURNINGO MOVEMENT rX� 330/OING T00 CLOSE SERIOUS O•5INJURY TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR INJURY 0 ��1 aNH 14 POSSIBLE 2% 5% 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK •4JURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 79% 21% 24 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 99 SW Walnut Street (East Segment) I,y07 St ./ MAIN S. — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network \ — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network © — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network NO Project Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND �� ��o PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES _ _ MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT •0%C) • 0 A - . _- •- 0 7% )k , A MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK 141/4, 1 10% PRESENT x BICYCLE DARK?-IT � 0 5% PEDESTRIAN DARK/UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 11 SW Walnut Street (East Segment) �'00ct r N1„ NUMBER OFlc. . CRASHES L . 94100. 10 J�111111P I Y TYPE OF CRASH ` r" y / ` _4,, vp i ....‘,, .. 4 :11110/Pr:NCV MOVING ry O VEHICLE QC/LG y ` �� ill 017, ,„,..... ., :. _ , _ 4,,,.. .„, .1 : ' - At..,44# PEDESTRIAN 'yam ` JO BICYCLE y / _. - , FIXED OBJECT �PJ \`\ _ ,�. , ` { •1 �i HEAD ON �� �'� R + ', 3 h� a f/// le" . � REAR END r• r __ �' ` I \ / 1 ANGLE w • ti ' ♦ a . © r, ' l iAs\ TURNING - ' MOVEMENT 4,, -I,. , . -� i +1 2 ' _�„ #. .� . -41 ' ,* - Aor SIDESWIPE s•f IC OUT OF Q/ r `►-/; • CONTROL •\'� T i' �``� / j t TWILIGHT! 1• , 0. / t , HIGHT TIME `r CRASH 20 - v - S :. ,` Only injury crashes 4 �, `` from 2018 to 2022 •ll�� J are included in J .i diagrams.Data is Q � sourced from ODOT a� V) �� CORRIDOR PROFILE 11 SW Walnut Street (East Segment) ra •,--• i 1113 l AZ , `1 �.11:A <?7- �— .a r '• k. ; ' y 0No.,..mh,i • - t - ++{�1. / ',� to .�' `W . ' . • =r4 ' -;11;0..(. •• 4 14, _ _.4 t. ...,4 , ' / .r r�, _ t •. f.. SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 hili More warning needed before signals Fx-I Lack of continuous( ugh ucorridor) pedestrian network SIGNAL VISIBILITY '. .I FILL SIDEWALK GAPS 2 I1II1I I11 Crossing improvements needed ENHANCED CROSSING 3 _ , Merge issues -I•r-- `-• STUDY ROUNDABOUT Crossing improvements 4 11111111 ENHANCED CROSSING d� 5 Turning-related crashes 4711 MANAGE TURNS CORRIDOR PROFILE 12 SW Walnut Street (West Segment) ` . , .t. . ,,, • - , • i ,r ,`.!.: 1 i - dry' .1�h !+-- -M.- ".r. `•4,+t r. . ' .•i /��. •., . r 0% A ri' i - i'S _ .4.4..:,,,;, ,',i1g,,,:.•41. si :',.v,\1L,I,i•' • _ :..i.ktt• _,-d y - - L:- :...v.-•‘..:"-..,!!:Ats;:: . f* a �' It.4 W• " 4 r i4.ti'At. ••t + lir / . ' ,r... ,, .. ,- . �P 1�: °� �1 ,�"'. ,,�. i ..fee. ' ' - %', ''4• .-,.` i . It ` � 7T'• _ _ ,���- • Mhor In�7 t. • �i- - M 1' ' - w� _. ii! .7.- ' T/ 't D yt,• • HPossible ry ., ' t-- '.:• :! o injury r .t ! ' I •l r •-,_ _;� -' - - — P[012Q Comdo W J / � ~.- - •yr t 7 (l"i •� ..,r:`- -• _ ` High Need EquiIyAreas 1%4' _ • .sA y.�. SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES I TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH . SEVERITY mph30-35 35% 35% FUNCTIONAL CLASS �^ REAR-END ��� FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE 0 AL INJURY Arterial � 27% 27% 0 X 0 SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD INJURY 1.52 - --- 5 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR i_ INJURY 'S ' 'RA 441 * NH ii POSSIBLE 4% 12% 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG• 73% 27% 10 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 12 SW Walnut Street (West Segment) ,w , a c _„,„,,T 5T r.i `• • �. �T - WALNUTST • - " _ '"'-- . ' — Tigard-owned High Injury Network • Partner-owned High Injury Network • — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network • III — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network al el Project Corridor ••• Speed Concern Comdor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND �� ��O/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES „rhoMOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT O O 4 90 • MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT 411) ,,,,,„, BIKE LANE SIDEWALK Igo/ PRESENT PRESENT BICYCLE DARK LIT PE DDA PEDESTRIAN ARK UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 12 SW Walnut Street (West Segment) # -k - _- ,F--1 NUMBER OF - " `'.`, CRASHES • , TYPE OF CRASH y r MOVING �� "' VEHICLE 7 'llipo PEDESTRIAN ` C� ° �� (' �� r j 46 BICYCLE - © • ED OBJECT ~HEAD ON � \ `f r11 Y � REAR ENO SW WALNUT LN \ f I. . s, _ .. .. . _... , _,E. .1 \ ... .._. .. _ ANGLE 7 ,11 sW�NU1 s -- M r am" fQI2® r TURNING \ ' 1 �} MOVEMENT SIDESWIPE S ir /- L + -_- • OUT OF rd• CONTROL •� ; • . . UJ\ TWILIGHT! t ?. ,� j I NIGHT TIME Q il CRASH UJ ,) L:. y f ` . . , 2 1• s Only in;ury crashes I— ` ' • from 20.16 to 2022 min i t' I are included in e-" '� •�' - diagrams.Data is I • , • — sourced from ODOT. r` CORRIDOR PROFILE 12 SW Walnut Street (West Segment) 1 a , >i1,•- 4 y, -e - 4, � ;f„ '> Ste' t.'r ��: �;-�'-� I �Q�- Al , . • s t• tot �� 'w F ' r I �te".fZ�, 'r -Y_►- ,, s - _ + *ta t , - 6.I.-3 • '7 ,j 1. ra t SI -• ' r. `7 -.... if �,_1I � ' t r . r v IL'r 10%5107 41. V ,CV n • w • ar..Q` M a 1, T ~, i� . © 4 © i '0 .a u 4 - � f r r,..**- .4 jtii •• ' .'' 40 •tj 11.-.Ilk -1 • - 'T 1'4: ,P.' "*. .., ,.;_ .. . _, tnamve.-.**-- rn ''.- 4a -• ,.. .... , • .4.. .„._ , ..- 1 :: - ' f. `- . ,47.., _ ''} t,- 'fit. "4, - _ '.. _ - - •' ' r� ,3 . ).1 , 4... 4; "'"acr''--‘mr:—•1-- - I A' ' 4 e ik",Y 1 -4*-4‘,.00- 4,- ift SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 Turning-related crashes MANAGE TURNS Crossing improvements 2 /1111111/ ENHANCED CROSSING needed 3 iiim More warning needed before signals SIGNAL VISIBILITY 4 Turning-related crashes 47, MANAGE TURNS 5 Limited srghd nes at intersections IMPROVE SIGHTLINES CORRIDOR PROFILE 13 SW Gaarde Street .• . . .-._ ,,,..... ,. =MIX 'Pli ", • ,.;,•. p- i 14 , ,...4 ,` ' ' '4- • ivs .t.,:ii-44'. • Olr4„ • • ',.‘..-.40- 1, • - .-: .,,,,_ _ _ -... 4. -i ;, .- i ., 1.., . e ^ 1, 'r, - k • - ., • ,,,,, , , . 1 '... ' :•, :'..e. V-.4:410;,.1"..119•••••'co ill .* V S. t. . •-v• A, , . .1 .11 ' 'ret., .. .4J'11110.• 41. 4 t. 4,t ./ -4,1r4K. 41.4.14,04.44,1, ll, ...ilit 1 ,...• - ' . ' g.;^--',t-;"""ri,r71.41•4$ '. ; . .7* 4tilif. ,-fiet. . ' - ' ' ' "S.4...1- .„1.. •• . ':.c•-1.1157: ^ t..4 -..- 0`.• 1 , -1 .4 .4 -_.4 r.:- 11,- • , , , , A/ - - '17,:' I. •. •1,4 0•.. • •c7: N' - . .. ' .1 .I • •• :*i •-44.1 7-'..•‘NS' . - . ,a - • f,„'•,,,,r, •* • • .4:4444 • obd L.I ' 4., . .. 'It..i44,1,,.. 1,70. .illfr 1 .-.1 4 . ' . :Sit •• f 1116— -, st_'..- "0'. -. - - ,26:?1,..:„;i,..... ': . ‘,...:„..,,,,,,w .„,,.. ......,1.. ,..:4,,,,, .k.__.„,.. PA P,a, •. a . 4 .,' * , , .. , ",,. , . 4.1, ::. ,,L,„;.,411.4'.::-...j11,_,..,". L • ' • ..11' 04 4 :r ,, '.'‘.4,4444:• '-t•L''.'4;;.,-'. ''-'-'/..4101 j: P- ..,q • .,- --‘-',i4,- ---411,:c -:+..„ oftwoorin. . _, , • ,f- k-'444.;-. . -,,,..., ,•:..:,.., e!., ' •,.. .,.., ,_ .,4,,'.... - '.•-., ...,, •,.,-....._9 f• ____,••,- . ....... _.._.,_ sir-.,,,..:4. .--,''',..: ',:•:',ir 'r, '2 'lite'-.'-v°"--..3 _v,, '-. ‘,„ - _e,,,..• • ..,. `+'7 Wee J77-7-', 3. 17, • :%,•.,t, 4 ,....4,.;'. .....- -;.4,'_: , •.-.,-` . ‘ ^ •, -..ri _ or . ,-.P.ii5 ,,s_:, .." 4 •••••-• .,••Lhil. ,i,,t_11,, • •4. ' 1447,9 -, •• . /. ''' • Falai : . 2 i 4 "•-' ''''' • - . • , ,_. - '. -' , • --- • .1, /, i ' • Servo liltury -7:.''1,..,. '''' 'e..,1,4, .., ,. — - .. • . ,..„ i isd, .,./1,-,- --,;,--.. ,t7 jr: ,IP .4,41....fee • __,,,., ... •.ViLt.j. ...-.....4.. '.i. y 1..-,\T r". ,)4 • Minor Injury ..r-,-...... it •--. 11,1 .1-.• .--, ..:. ,„...,...--...,- 4 _ v•*‘-.1 " .4 IP''-• • • of*_,_ i2,.: II ,,,-4' -1`• . all - ...,....,44r .-, .. • ., - Passible injury 1 •.-'• - ie: s , GA,i!kltDE ge -- '14 ' i L..W;- if M C'D 0 NA I.I No tolory ,.... 4 ...' ')a..-.1.., 4-11111r .i. , • -...,....,..- • - •. - 4t, c, - . , • , - -. — pmocic.,-.10, --- .....,---..-c-tut -, .- ,-,„„,- --- •••• .•,..,4,.......4_,,, _ - • -: • .-1: :ex • . .44,, --,.. it Nigh Need EquNy Areas '': 7 . ..•4 • • .11.. "••N. .•-•- ._ SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 25-30 mph , —Ix--> 40'3/0 0 35% 1 --- FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Arterial a, 350/0 ,,s;) 26°/0 1 LENGTH (MILES) 4X REAR•END /1 XI I— H FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE SERIOUS INJURY 1.71 ____ _ 13 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS : CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR livalier INJURY 'S ' fi% 441 31:11: NA 28 POSSIBLE 41°/0 90/ 00/ INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED• DRUG- 63% 370/o 25 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 13 SW Gaarde Street .• WALNUT ST AI `'�q(yGr r ST ,06, •• • JW O ali'\le<Se ti -- Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner owned High Injury Network --- Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network GAARDE ST a +' Partner owned Systemkc Safety Network MO Project Corridor .."2,.. ••• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND 61 69O/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT . O • 0 99Al& 0 MOTORCYCLE BIKE LANE SIDEWALK A A W�; /TWILO/OGHT I� PRESENT PRESENT ', Cr. BICYCLE DARKLIT � 3 3% PEDESTRIAN DARKIUNLIT O% UNKNOWN 13 SW Gaarde Street NUMBER OF — r. y',: I C'1l•,L 1. CRASHES .�yk 4.. ' Iv • • s• TYPE OF CRASH 'a 1� �~ -' - MOVING ° VEHICLE 20 • .it. it 4—)L41SW GAARDE ST / - %f` . PEDESTRIAN ldt BICYCLE R 11J .41.14e.- /- _ El FIXED OBJECT �, CM 1 (A) /it HEAD ON e- - -6: N -/ I_L7 REAR END �" 1 •/ f 4 1 n SW GAARDE ST ANGLE '� //I-Pi 0 TURNING (— MOVEMENT p �01� f ��� cc �,i1, f. SIDESWIPE G I - ti `� 0 Allt Door V7 (../ . �� / �Y OUT OF QQ �� a` CONTROL - - e. _ p • SW GAARDE ST / .r TWILIGHT/ 4 'r / ,' NIGHT TIME 7 .///,': cras _hes ,„ :,,, 4, from 2018 to 20221,1 101.41/0 �- s .... „....,,,i,_ . are ncluded m t F ; .1 T �, i •, `.•. diagrams Data s , ` sourced from ODOT ' i} Lys CORRIDOR PROFILE 13 SW Gaarde Street ,,, „..,,- ..,,,_... .-. - i 1 :11:1 z �" .• , ''in ,w - \ v �ba , , � ,y, �'•n, • •( - �.'+ - '7• 't i'!vi ��.r*'N V • -`f ;4.—i ' .7r.••■*L.:' MEW Sj ''01 -: 111111111r7 ` }� / +. • t~..- • `- .7,• , +. ` , raj . ,t.4.R� + • . .r 4:4• r '�r /ry . �- aE�.•. - `y }///�.` �. .-�'�. . ' rl .. :/f11�_ ,/ i�..wlii':4µ11 • r y.:/R. ,`� ,.OA \ yI1_ - -'�'�y'+' `•.* 'wK• i.: �... t� '� v_�• �111111� .,y 4 1 • .ti %� 33��__�• ,�{ t; i y �� �� a i .� ,�� '� \'►.��. r r. Y �r 'syi. J� `. , . ..._.,- ,,,,,, ,----,,,, ,, ,,-,- ..., '4 ,,... L. s ' •.• + a ' 1t, ` GAARDE Sri` 1'I_ •c •f L•*• '• �• �, `•, r N. "`y �' > . y 2 ❑1 • •. . • . _ n© .. MCDONALD T' F.'.� ' ._ • • I - - . L - �'�J ! ♦ rti� -ram ,..�: -- . ! SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 lilililil Crossing ENHANCED CROSSING needed 2 "IN More warning needed before signals tr.N SIGNAL VISIBILITY 3 1`� MAN AG concerns(throughout corridor) MANAGE SPEEDS CORRIDOR PROFILE 14 SW Burnham Street , _4ki... ,- -i-7,,x /, -,L1 0 - ,,,,,<JKA - . ) . . . °� s ` . f <. * ' �..�. 1: Tigard TirangIe, ' -fi mom. 7 - ♦ '.a .; «,M ''" f:r14 f Ova .�_, , : ' " ' 1 t .' ' . C'' 4°"•441'1 --'1 . .- 4.11-:-7''1-': N . C-, ;'''• 7*.V5'4'P'P'K' n it'. ' fY ..11;,:ks, . '. 1:. -- .:^1. ' A F' r ' •- ., , ' Doivntoten: ,_''.' ' -, ' II) ,. 4S' ile , '•,_ r 4 ri"' ,: ' ', F f\ rr-. `i - -, ./site . NA- "Mr ,. ' ' :V44 ,..!;14...... '':-...;14, . :..., -.' ''''''''' ' L —. iti Serious Injury T.7c6 ' -Al-R » a ► r - Project Corridor t ♦ } 1+ `� .k- • High Need Equity Areas No Injury ' �...- �?� ia��S •�' 4� �`. � _. . _ - - .ram. SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH 20 mph X 38% J—X- SEVERITY 38% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT pm IMPROPER TURN FATAL INJURY Collector 2 0 2 LENGTH (MILESI v 250�0 25 /O SERIOUS �^ FIXED OBJECT FAILURE TO YIELD INJURY 0.40 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY o r4/‘ � IIII 431 2 POSSIBLE 13% 13% 0% INTERSECTION MID--BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL. SPEED• DRUG- 63% 38% 3 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 14 SW Burnham Street \N . A..... 0P�N� H(4YI D J`7) 0`' eO 7 y9 4,S l — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network WO Project Corridor d ••S Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND I PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES iiir 75% MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT •© • O ellike Al& 1 1133O MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT / . NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK c_A0/ PRESENT 13 BICYCLE DARKiLIT �`• 0 0% PEDESTRIAN DARK!UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 14 SW Burnham Street NUMBER OF CRASHES itik.... L .. .. , TYPE Of CRASH n c. . i MOVING • VEHICLE , • PEDESTRIAN . m �; •-5"Yil • J - - • —IBICYCLE Q 2 FIXED OBJECT o- l HEAD # _ lilivt f .i REAR END / ' ANGLE j • �- 00 r TURNING MOVEMENT M S� , gURN�A ----AAP t , .-- ‘1\i BUR - - - \ — ..01?*'","" 1.6° ---e- 1 - . SIDESWIPE OUT OF \ CONTROL ♦4 . TWILIGHT/ \�,� NIGHT TIME v:\r �' �"*�\ - \ k CRASH f Alf- y a► \ Only injury crashesArright' -- \ � from 2018 to 2022 ` i , are included in diagrams.Data is I �j sourced from ODOT i F s k If �' CORRIDOR PROFILE 14 SW Burnham Street ' ` •• � t `► .A . L' #L• ' - - `�-,. ' _ Tigard Triangle , f - fi► - t ag1 y \ OtP Gy?i�F IP - - . 4P116 • 4i. .-.... 4:* -- , . . , ._, i.,,,,, ;,.. 10 • '1/41 ur 414F4. T .11` •S '.• IS 'lr `• ` A'Se j J•- �/ ` \f. '''‘''' 40,S,^ \ V i• / , '',, . lip, `+ - 4 'Downtown,. T !: ,:. , -s 15,4.047.,- \ ,,.. `� . - y 1 / *Sei ,,_,-.. .i. , , .. .- L..- - , , ,,'--'' . --.4. '. 4, i;idi , ., ,, , , -,-, , , ',,,..--::.-.., .i: * . • . SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 ill! More warn ng needed before signals SIGNAL VISIBILITY 2 Crashes with fixed objects 0MOVE FIXED OBJECT 3 1111111 Wide intersection with overlapping conflicts ENHANCED CROSSING CORRIDOR PROFILE 15 SW Bull Mountain Road gi l� . •I 4. •]— • ar `'�l..a .�,,., .' a �� T{ .. Y-" III ` . - . I') 1.4, (_ ? I ft 44P„/ ifkoto 41, '0, .... S.' • . ' - .. 4. „,, i.Ip MOUNTAIN { ,• 3—Is ::21 '-....'t:' I, �i. j IP �{ , ' 4.40:11.11:74sen.:::::,), 44'Mj 'r �!♦ r ;� - �_I�.11'_ `r. t -�..- ". '� -v ` — k : +yNa,"•, .1�•� I.1 ' •1 pdw— ,_- 4' r .. • Minor lnNry .;; r .y 1 s ; - ' 4 0 ' -- I' - - - Possible --i �._ 4,4— " s - �_ _ -YID. I _ . iY © • s a M'Y ,' ��' + a s ii 4J` f y0' r !, y ?'r B E N D '�i Pmrect Corrbor !+_�a.4 si. r s y_• r~� . , •, C. e • High Need Equity Areas a .1.•• s =;.++^( ;--- SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 35 mph ->X f1 55% F.Xi 41% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Collector —x 22% 0 16 /0 3 SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD INJURY 1.47 - 10 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY ' ' fi% 8/4111 Inc Nil 17 POSSIBLE 4% 14c/O 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 59% 41% 19 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 15 SWBuII Mountain Road .. Li I,Lp, G!`41o4T QTN Rp . - x BUI.L MOUNTAIN RD — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network 6 11111 Project Corridor i1 ^ ••• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS 1 PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND �+ �+O/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES iiho MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • © • O 0 8% (2)% 0 AIL MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK • 140/O PRESENT BICYCLE DARK/LIT h 0 2% PEDESTRIAN DARKrUNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 15 SW Bull Mountain Road NUMBER OF it - 4 -_ `'. . ' r:yF•J - , 7^. CRASHES w 7 i Vt �. Q 4 iEmir ...-- 2 :sue _ TYPE OF CRASH W 4 i. 1 .' . 7 • '> .-. �' MOVING i VEHICLE i�/S Iit 4lir , alit M 5W BULL PEDESTRIAN � SW BULL MO* +� ��' 1'./�♦! MOUNTAIN RD �--7t� './�1/1 W $pLL ^'� 5 AIN RO �� i BICYCLE ,,ra 'B' r ?ac,_- * MpUN W f f Z FFIIXED OBJECT t = w p' HEAD ON Ra. O _ _- * . tea? REAR END y. 654t ro, ANGLE Ili i TURNING / " • MOVEMENT - f t l SIDESWIPE ' S `. 3 �-- Ilk OUT OF . �f CONTROL � � r . , .. Pil TWILIGHT) MOVNTA�N RD / / . f NIGHT TIME � SW BU4�• � , �� CRASH iy ' '-- Only injury crashes `' '.+ I s from 2016 to 2022 are mcfudetl `\ d.agrams Datt a�s \ � , L 1 sourced from ODOT ` `1 I Q� / t` 1� CORRIDOR PROFILE 15 SW Bull Mountain Road 3,_ q J. 's i• h• ••'��� ar r? .ice ..• i �.t s ,� J -r n Y ai l• ' i*If- - -1t. s 4j4 -'lJ- - `1 e 0 y _ . t'i. .""f 4.tI/- `f‘ [•' �' . `• ram. �- - -* .N.a - 1 4 • • -'r -- ^ 03111,MOUNTAIN CD • r ' `,' I ii •�I •' O ' 0 SAFETY ISSUES AND COUNTERMEASURES 1 ':x a Lack of continuous pedestrian network 11111111 I I II�II' Crossing improvements needed (tnrougnoul corridor) FILL SIDEWALK GAPS ENHANCED CROSSING Turning-related crashes Speeding concerns(throughout corridor) 2 MANAGE TURNS 7 1`� MANAGE SPEEDS 3 11111111 Crossing improvements ENHANCED CROSSING 4 iiii More warning needed before signals SIGNAL VISIBILITY 5 IM Limited srghtlines at intersections IMPROVE SIGHTLINES CORRIDOR PROFILE 16 SW 72nd Avenue (North Segment) �.:* •'- - ~GreenbugRood/No,fh ',r B. * '�� r' ) , } GIQeN - . ," , HAINES ST g "� ! �l . .;. \,- '_. _sir 1 . ....-:c.i......,t141 .....rA4., .,...q) fr. re, ,x , \ ,„_ - ,. _ , NI , „oil* ,�,s, L . C. Ai sr 1 �- I"A . :41 .tri`V ' I SM y..♦`r. ., ai' - ! as • senow injury,` • ...0 ' "+ ;,► • f r r i • 4 i • 'Amoror Injury •tf` � �.. SY �[ Mr ®`4y „-; t yu .{I - Possible lnryry (,.• w# tON7P 2 -'- .\, V;, ; 9'PO 11 H�AiMPJQN ST• P• �� {Y — ProjectCornaor `! >4 y, - _ - High Need Ewa Areas 1�i ; - ' SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH 30 mph SEVERITY -x 41% i-x-I 33% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR-END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Arterial 41% 2 x- 22% SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD INJURY 0.88 12 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR tr INJURY 1.1% 4NH 3110 15 POSSIBLE 4% 4% 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 63% 37% 20 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 16 SW 72nd Avenue (North Segment) i 4 L • A_ $T��� ~`,GRf Fy,ti pc ` HAINES ST .,P,0 •0 \ 0 I I f' -..\ 11114'217, -4Rl'NOUT/{ST Iz r' too G I. C ; G ,/ Je3 p• Z — Tigad-owned High Injury Network o Partner-owned High Injury Network \ • , • — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network \ G°4, • y7 21; Partner owned Systemic Safety Network N ,iv £ RD 11 HAMP 410 Project Corridor rON ST •• • Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE i ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND oRi48 ���/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES siMOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT •0%414) • O tAll ],' 0 MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT 4% ' NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK 1 160/O PRESENT riki 1 BICYCLE DARK/LIT 0 0% PEDESTRIAN DARK/UNLIT 2% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 17 SW Greenburg Road (North Segment) A ` ' .t,i ii *,41 ..- - ' ._—.• • f 4 Y,s F.) err 4 Jill 0 ti i '�.r. �^ �,r, �y - LOCUST 5T NIMBUf 94� J . It t �� m� . SetbusInfory ram, �, - i �.� 4r+ .... y • MYwt lnlury—,Y 77 .,o J. 'y � � `r H+►c'�."14r..� �r. • Possible jury - �` +~r. • •�'► �,-v..� '.1 �. �![`. - 0 I •w j._''�+.+ ��, r No Injury N P "I L. f },' I� ittN; �7 h' I r; !~ ;� , rSS, Corm« ll j, ••• - L` i ' �! 0. 4' ...4 • {P OAK ST Nigh Need Egon),areas SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 35 mph ; x-3 46% 28% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Arterial v 30% 22% 1 LENGTH (MILES) �^ REAR END ��� FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE INJURYSERIOUS 0.64 7 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR INJURY Q lit , ID Nil 17 POSSIBLE 0% 2% 0% INTERSECTION MID•BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG• 84% 16% 25 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 17 SW Greenburg Road (North Segment) 1 QoF. S°\"\.5, 4 km li W ea � n 9 C) .000S'AST NiMBps pB. m - Tigard-owned High Injury Network T. m = Partner-owned High Injury Network II i Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network © — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network ACM 5- 4. Project Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES I,, 47 66% MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • © i (7 4 0 8% A A MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT NO BIKE LANE NO SIDEWALK O r_ii•t) 0 /O BICYCLE DARK,1IT APEDESTRIAN DARK/UNLIT 0O/O UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 18 SW Hall Boulevard (North Segment) '^ !' + ' LOCUST ST 'r .4.4 I. J. 4- �` c .•. r . JAK ST d fs' i, ` t I . . ---x.„_.. t...,ir- , . , .. : ± {g -,. ;.1 NL f t r�4 t �-1, M : .:,...7 41' .. 4C 4, ip 0 '1r fr -111" is; .. _ y - I - l 7.1 _ bfYg Road/No/fll _ ♦ q � AEENevk _ �, ��w. hr� 'T� < � Fa191 13r4 4 . 1 G� e . r A 1 }� Serious n}ury .-'�_ -g.+-',- �Z'� . a +. a - .} �i�i+--`% �i HA�MES,S • At no lnWry __... O •- Pcssbe Injury te-'' ~ l i,1 �•: `. } - F No Injury .04 N .� 1 — II - � ) - Awl IN , 1 S — P elect CORK Or ` ,1 a �,{� HigA Heed Eqi ty Areas 401 SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH 30 mph X4 45% SEVERITY 38% 1 FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Arterial 32% LL 27% SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) �X rx REAR-END � FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE INJURY 0.87 20 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY IS ' riA , 25 POSSIBLE 3% 9% 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL SPEED DRUG- 54% 46% 27 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 18 SW Hall Boulevard (North Segment) tcr.sr.; Z 4 ` r 7,.'.0.Sr - ,,. 42111 u a PI4E 51y 47 I r, ' y �,�" I.- r _ T N. 7 , R � FEAFrli` ST , Na y �'�P_,N- PG RD Tigard owned High Injury Network 4� \ �\ a � Partner owned High Injury Network .`:/o `• 9 , , 7 as N, --. Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network © `riJ�\ (J, Project Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND �� ���/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IQ,0 • • iii& 0 MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 0%11111 O • O 70 MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT BIKE LANE SIDEWALK • O 11% PRESENT PRESENT BICYCLE DARK/LIT fi A O EDESTRIAN DARK/UNLIT O% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 19 SW Hall Boulevard (Central A Segment) �"a.i`; ` , .okb ' -Green' Rood l North Tigard •' - r J1 a F' . D4RjNGb H 16I. * ti,' '', 4r, , T Sr -4 L 44ittr. ''''' '4. ":' . . . y f ,.... . .. .,. - ,� `� `hits . �4s _ __._ , , - - ck z . ' ,,, ,, . • Y y. 1�7. , r A> '\ Tigard�Triongls= \ Z '�'? ■ i. - tiu;ti t" V. •- r`- �'' ..-* t ,i - .w- 7 `r';,`r _`.. h `,'i t. "L'n- ; ç :) "l (�y . •. f i,• ~�`y t ,_ A i `� v y "4, I • Fetaf r! W j ' i *. AF' .1 . - -,y .. x wr# .' Ye �i t �ja tro No, ` , i e f ♦ '' '. r � .k IN' ' . _. /-• .' : '': ( • .. _ . .J ..A ,•i.: t HghNeedEatenJArees SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 30 mph -X 63% I-x� 55% 1 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR-END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Arterial ---x4 20% 15% 1 SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) TURNING MOVEMENT DISREGARD TRAFFIC CONTROL INJURY 0.42 5 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY o el% � 27 POSSIBLE 2% 3°/O 0°/O INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 71% 29% 31 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 19 SW Hall Boulevard (Central A Segment) 1r i . Tk ST a� ! 1------ - \\\T 4111 0.�,/• �. A 17 .,. y'. > cz,7� z — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network �J eGp Hu — Tigard owned Systemic Safety Network yyg4 44 Rp — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network © sr �� � Project Corridor ••• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ice., 63 75% MOTOR VEHICLE k DAYLIGHT • 0 a1 0 MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT 3 O�o 0%BIKE LANE SIDEWALK o �o0/O PRESENT PRESENT k7 BICYCLE DARK+LIT i 2 0 �O I II PEDESTRIAN DARK1UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 20 SW Hall Boulevard (Central B Segment) ,- 'r 4:. . •C'' AN°. k..f.,..14*.!.:r:.%-4- ‘-i 4.'''''' .*''7 ' ttilibL Ab' . k.','•:''-4i,k' '' ' . .... S ' : ' L . • .� _ 1Tigard Triangle• ,a . 1t , , mo 3� r ? .+. ; , r. ,b e �r _ Ilk' qr l r i 0! -I0 Y , • ..• DowntOwn :4,44."T• * _ ', 1* x - ^ ' -1► i "te } - -_� ..yam it • . '+ °'. 17 * ,1.1,0. tt 'Ai." .. -, 4 ei4 i 1 .,_. '. Minor Injury , Y • .� It. r, . . 11 Possible to _ ♦ J _ ~� •' r+ jury No Injury 1 t _ S . ti'. r, f •-.• .( , Y■ — Project Corrbor lif N 4., 4 F High Need Nulty Areas SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 30-35 mph �X 73% ' Fx-i 55% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR-END H. FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Arterial � 27°/O 1S% '� / x SERIOUS LENGTH (MILES) ANGLE FAILURE TO YIELD INJURY 0.41 M 3 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY ili 1S ' rill 411, :II: Nil 4 POSSIBLE 0% 0% 0%/O INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 0% 100% 4 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 20 SW Hall Boulevard (Central B Segment) yq. MUKFR hIr i Sr RO \„ :..i w o' 19 I N — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network © M Project Corridor 1000 Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND + 100% PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES iRiP M✓,OTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT •At2 • O O • o DA �o MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT E BIKE LANE )k SIDEWALK 2 OO/O PRESENT PRESENT c4 BICYCLE DARK+LIT h 0 0% PEDESTRIAN DARKrUNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 21 SW Hall Boulevard (South Segment) e . . ... , J....--1....v .,.,. ._, r 21:.4.4. . .,> 1-- ) 4:v t. :St•.1 .,-, i:cy 6AARDE� N ^� MCDONALD� . ., \1 a L' • ) :',•:" `ti•0� , v.,' ' - i -4 •L 44 a ~14 . • - •AR gm 1 ow i MOUNTAINS • s... -a �j� _ � �� W�► • if 7 0 (� t ti ..+ Durham Rood _ t 1 a V • • Serious Injury o 4 � 1' eJ�¢t�4 .I4�Yir .�ri..,r . 7 a i '► ` _5- • Mvwr Injury wz ". *t - �i.'y. eria t--c. . _•V. n` • ?•.--. - - - PvssiDle lnNry lL w0 ,: ',.' DURHAM Imo- 4 - • I< w ~?.:S ProlettConl6or ti -- . _ -y- . i ♦ —• ! Nigh Need Equity Nee s SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 35 mph -x 40% �x� 31% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR•END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Arterial x-> 37% `t� 22% 4 LENGTH MILES + ® SERIOUS I TURNING MOVEMENT ® FAILURE TO YIELD I INJURY 1.27 16 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR 1111141 INJURY l ' ITt 111Nil Inc 16 POSSIBLE 3% 7% 1% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 62% 38% 32 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 21 SW Hall Boulevard (South Segment) L• —y \1 s, 7 q i _,. . f., . . GAARDE Siif, �1% _�,_ , , MCDONALD ST `J. 1 �. BONITA RD BULL MOUNTAIN RD. , • ` • -- a , of p z• 4 CO ilip ROVII '` Often 0�N0 � � Ill t )-'I )011); j , — Air Partner-owned High Injury Network - Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network t - Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network 4181*I1/417 © _, '� DURHAM RD , 7 Project Corridor 1100 Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 111111 IR.. 64 69% MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT 12% 67t's O • 0 0 MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT 4 . BIKE LANE SIDEWALK • 18% , ; PRESENT PRESENT V BICYCLE DARK/LIT i I 1% PEDESTRIAN D ARKK!UNLIT O% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 22 SW McDonald Street . • ' ''•- , j.s.'T x., - . - .e•.,.., t t , N LLB � -i I► � _. ••♦ - y t.•t •i I `.tt+! •.K� • _ - _ tij .. Jil•r• �• J fi r i , s ,• 1 .1.�•„,,,,} RC' 414 1��w, y > y ii • • • . • • �.� • 44 i - f r {4 ' /,j C" '. ,�it- • • ti , ,ry'� ;*-i I+ � , y • An { ' ,. . �_ •`- -i ` ` Ir �y. 141, i' ~ �; '" _.1 `f a k- !a-• is XV '�•' i "lei 't .,? + .i c. •• i.1 MCDONALD ' - rj,. .. t oz �.. r� s Zr" ,!' . .t r , • *��'-_,,t, s i -r . .:. •t 1st s:. hr :11 '}WI•.10 aa.'• - it .� - .. i • Irk-� �• 9.. -•*.� I • 1 " -aur. 1. 4 F• , ... ., f"---• • y L `a ex, tv •14.4 A�- . •, .0. •. •<,9C.1.'. Y le"��r, , • 11•N - •I'-• '�� r 1 i - F.'._ • MNor Injury • taa R. Y- . , i . 1 - w r A'• d'• 4 C•. } r` Passible mWry �W� � .' ~� . f�t�C, .4 y. ,'�' � f._3 ' - �..•1JC -�♦1 • Lr.:t1, �: Ho Injury -i: �r; J ~1 Y•4t�.%- It-�.'.�.dr�; -R � � �� t -t• F j� — � `�"•} �4.� -7:� r y' '.� protect C°"id°r 4, L , 1,^��^ ...�4„,„ .* ••• '- ,e—. 1 ',� > .. • �' �Y - Hgn Need EquaY Areas SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 35 mph x 44% 48% 0 I FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Arterial � 40% 28% 0 LENGTH (MILES) � REAR END ��� FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE SERIOUS INJURY 1.05 4 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY i o (Vt ,4 12 POSSIBLE 0% 0% 00/O INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 60% 40% 9 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 22 SW McDonald Street j i is tinny - " - - - __ - - _ -. — MCDONALD ST --6-- _ n r m r �. a - — Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner owned High Injury Network — Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network © al Project Corridor ••• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND z / 24 84°/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES MOTOR VEHICLE ! DAYLIGHT • O • 0 - A i 1 ri•., 0 4% l 'I' , . MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT BIKE LANE SIDEWALK 0 1AO/O PRESENT PRESENT .-' r., .. ki, . , .., i) V BICYCLE DARK/LIT i 0% O O PEDESTRIAN DARK'UNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 23 SW Tiedeman Avenue .�..�1 .. ' _ -y- u .,rot •� , �' • } ..- r. TTTTT �, \ r't, t .• _� .r t 1 t'b•` y ,p '�'� 'r. ,y,*K Greenburg Road,,North Tigard -' _•..} ji.� ..if 'a.+ i ••fly4 / ` S�1�r i ie k 4 tl-i1Ai r'REFHe •..c' s n/-31, ' J • 1 •.... a-�r • .♦ ..._* -9.- c. r .Q� .� ,. •`r., �_ may.- y1 - `� k. • t _ 1,, e10- * '�•oci 4 -,+`-'fir '► "si. fitej,44 1..I. r .h• _ -i ^ ! - =j;` ---4''''' '`'� .`,ice " �1/4n';, - .1. ` , ►� • 1 �- 'f_ ` .a,. �r. .• ikiir * liCS F. ... • Minor Injury ,n. ; - - t 1 Ay 1, s:. - -.'- <9; • Possible Inwry r L ' r y .r . ` 4,..- ,17 - �p No InNry N r !' 11112u� .' '' r' ^' :!Fti`` ti ♦ �` 1., .� — Protect Corridor r �. j ,yf �_,- �• •,t.� 3• ��. -� '� r/ - "-. '\'.` High Need Equrry Nees SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH SEVERITY 25 mph x- 35% ► E 41% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS TURNING MOVEMENT ® FAILURE TO YIELD FATAL INJURY Collector x3 24% FX--I 24% 0 LENGTH (MILES) ANGLE FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE SERIOUS INJURY 0.75 4 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ INJURY o lit �� 4 f� POSSIBLE 0% VO/0 0% INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 65% 35% 9 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 23 SW Tiedeman Avenue I: . PFaFFtE,Sr,� GR�FNBURG QO a`� ��v � 2t7 ym ( . Tigard-owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network - Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network ` — Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network 1 d - NpLNUT ST Project Corridor ••• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND 16 +`�/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES IRO MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • O • O O 0 18% MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT BIKE LANE SIDEWALK 05Ib X ). , 1 OO/O PRESENT PRESENT i r V BICYCLE DARK/LIT 0 0% PEDESTRIAN DARKIUNLIT 0% UNKNOWN CORRIDOR PROFILE 24 SW 79th Avenue -.r ... fir.? �7.: 4' „ �► 777 ` a IX?BONiTA RD i it._ ,mod _"-'S T� 4) �• '� r.1:�ily', y W .f 1i• 1."-. phi_ may' v+ .4 �1 iY • 1� Itt, p - h ......- .„ .,�'• a "� ' 1 f7!• .,�"". m`r•t, I�.ate,' '_ t 1_ > Ilk i • e ,rr -f Al . Y;;�aC �'ti``fi.•�11s� t+--,? f tia:-t'�.�' y• r '' ilt;114 tji !"1 ",10 4 1 •r' �'.r. `:''y��; -y:.,± , '' .a: - ,ter.�yC+�a •. �tm 1 4 _et • Minor Injury T, 14 �� R A• la�r�A�..��j .`r• .'t '': "; '' �.. y� ➢ '.i • POSS�M2111NrY ar �.: w y.1- i... „�, ..4 - • e•r��`a.�` - .'4.S�' - • , �v a•• �Y ,..• , �� _ 4.4 No Injury - � 'v-; 0r• -DURHAM RD'- ....::+-8 y[h _ _ Yi" •y.I . ` 4..y ^ .'' — Poiectcaneor .�. .. 'f, :F ,i1 .. 4 � ,'r �'"ti' - ,. 14 di' Ilk r High Need EVwty Areas C i,,�hit.M• _ yr -' - ^N��-t -- ,r.. - j ►. `' SPEED LIMIT TOP CRASH TYPES TOP CRASH BEHAVIORS CRASH 25 mph SEVERITY x 75% i-x-i 75% 0 FUNCTIONAL CLASS REAR•END �_ FOLLOWING TOO CLOSE FATAL INJURY Neighborhood — 0 Ix-) o 25 /0 O 0 25 /0SERIOU LENGTH (MILES) ( TURNING MOVEMENT FAILURE TO YIELD I JURYS 0.75 1 TOP CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS CRASH LOCATIONS MINOR _ildir :tic Nil INJURY IS ' fVli 11,1111111 POSSIBLE 2 00/O 00/O 00/O INTERSECTION MID•BLOCK INJURY ALCOHOL- SPEED- DRUG- 750/o 25% 1 INVOLVED INVOLVED INVOLVED NO INJURY CORRIDOR PROFILE 24 SW 79th Avenue T BONITA RD IH� y^ .n 41=1' . G 7 t O o Z b h '11_ Tigard owned High Injury Network Partner-owned High Injury Network Tigard-owned Systemic Safety Network 1 Partner-owned Systemic Safety Network �.,��Dl1RHAM�RD II ,' ap Project Corridor �_ ••• Speed Concern Corridor CRASHES BY MODE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRESENCE OF BICYCLE AND ,_, 7 5O/O PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 0 MOTOR VEHICLE DAYLIGHT • © • 0 Ak elikilk. MOTORCYCLE TWILIGHT DARK!LI 0% NO BIKE LANE SIDEWALK DARK H PRESENT ri,4% 1 25% BICYCLE T i 0 0% PEDESTRIAN DARKiUNLIT 0% UNKNOWN Tigard Safe Streets Action Plan City Council Meeting August 12 , 2025 sea E:s sPLAN� Agenda 1 . Safe Streets Strategies 2. Priority Safety Corridors 3. Recent and Upcoming Engagement 4. Next Steps SAFE STREETS ACTION The 5 E's—Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence PLAN 1 . Safe Streets Strategies SAFE -SGCTION PLAN Safe Streets Strategies : Process Strategy Strategy Development Refinement Comparison Best practices to city Staff Strategies City staff Internal review policies/ interviews development work session review (now) manuals SAFE STREETS ACTION The S E's—Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence PLAN Safe Streets Strategies Topics covered : • Capital Projects & Maintenance li.„ I • Planning and Private Development '•:, i • Programs , • Funding .A ;, _ �, lipp, • Enforcement & Emergency Response City team members consider the set of refined strategies SAFE STREETS ACTION The 5 E's—Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence cN PLAN Safe Streets Strategies : Departments Police City Department Finance Management p g Public Works Community Development SAFE STREETS ACTION The 5 E's—Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence PLAN Public Works • Check if locations have a history or risk of serious crashes and add safety improvements when starting projects there. • Create a team that meets regularly to review recent serious crash sites and recommend engineering fixes. • Prioritize safety when selecting which street projects to fund and build. • Scope a program for installing new streetlights where better lighting could prevent crashes. • Coordinate with partners like TriMet, ODOT, and emergency services to improve safety with features like emergency signal timing and better lighting. .SAFE STREETS ACTION The 5 E's-Tigard's Community Promise•Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence PLAN Community Development • Apply for grant funding with other cities and agencies to support regional safety projects. • Coordinate with outside agencies to plan safety upgrades on major roads the City doesn't control. • Establish process to set aside money to help the city apply for grants for safety projects. • Learn from other cities' e-bike and scooter programs and update Tigard's rules to support safe use. • Involve high school students in planning safer streets near schools and share info about walking, biking, and driving safely. • Partner with TriMet, AARP, and others to help older adults feel confident using transit, walking, or biking. .,SAFE STREETS ACTION The 5 E's—Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence PLAN 2 . Priority Safety Corridors iTsmEETS ACTION *PLAN Step 1 : Location Eligibility Location must be: • on the city-owned network, OR • on a street in the process of being jurisdictionally transferred to City, OR • an intersection of two city-owned streets AND On one or more of the following: • High Injury Network • High Injury Intersection • Systemic Safety Network • Speeding Concern Corridor c ,5AFE a STREETS ACTION The 5 E's-Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence ' PLAN Eligible locations scored on alignment with Safe Streets Action Plan Goals • • • • WWI eo tfet At EQUITY VULNERABLE LIVABLE ROAD USERS COMMUNITIES Locations where a greater High crash and high risk streets Locations where making it percentage of residents are for people walking and bicycling, safe and comfortable to socially vulnerable or less and locations where a greater walk, bike, and take transit likely to have transportation percentage of households do not will help us meet Tigard's options they can afford. have vehicles. climate goals. Corridor Selection Process Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 • Eligibility • Scoring • City & Task • Public and • Partner screening Force Input Council Input coordination Safety Priority Corridors TAYLORS FEM.RO j+N 3,_, a ID New Projects scKotitseEaa"� o iocuST 57 zf OAK Sr 1 SW 68th/69th Ave 10 2 SW Bonita Rd V `3 i 15 ID Funded Projects or 3 SW Cascade Ave 'T s• 4 Projects with oWsao trsT r '19 1 4 SW Dartmouth St aFa �„a�"° t2 ~may Design/Planning Work --�� -hi \ C lrkfrt Rp s 5 SW Durham Rd 14ii 0 16 SW 72nd Ave (North) 17 SW Greenburg Rd 6 SW Hunziker Rd �" RO /3 D '`� ' HS�R G4aROE ST V.7w At T r s� Wr. Sr off. r; (North) 7 SW Main St aui MOutiT„„RD d 9 8 SW Royalty Pkwy a 75 BONITARD 110._2 18 SW Hall Blvd (North) 9 SW 72nd Ave (South) a 21 24 0 ; 19 SW Hall Blvd (Central A ^_o Segment) 10 SW Greenburg Rd (South) ci BEND Ro DURHAfI AD ccBEEF 5 20 SW Hall Blvd (Central 11 SW Walnut St (East) K B Segment) 0 12 SW Walnut St (West) Project Status 21 SW Hall Blvd (South) 13 SW Gaarde St -NeXPo7ea 22 SW McDonald St -Fully funded,cOnstrucbon sthedulec1 14 SW Burnham St - ,petAgn underway,sec-king fundiny 23 SW Tiedeman Ave 15 SW Bull Mountain Rd • •P`'r""`9 sin" e c °' 'ungfun ng L-� � 24 SW 79th Ave Park © Tigard SS4A: Locations in Safety Priority Corridors TAYLORS FERRY ke need of new o ID Corridor Name e "' > 1 SW 68th/69th Avenue � safety �µ0 w 2 SW Bonita Road FE0.R sT m 3 SW Cascade Avenue scHoLts 0 OAK ST 3 4 SW Dartmouth Street • LrWA 5 SW Durham Road r o• e c t 6 SW Hunziker Road p 7 a 1 7 SW Mdin Street A rP? 8 SW Royalty Parkway conceptsm `�� 4 9 SW 72nd Ave f South; es*wof18 `VT ST 12111440, „,r\`'�t < 16 SW Greenberg Rd(South) 440.001 7P W6�ti, 11 SW Walnut Street(East) `�` 1i�7 14� ~ktR.Ro 'O 12 SW Walnut Street(West' ' a. 13 SW Gaarde Street } ap N ) ml uy� 14 SW Burnham Street ge g 1-3 (sr 15 SW Bull Mountain Road GAARDE ST MCDONALD ST =1 Bat MOUNTAIN RR 9 !-1S BOND,Z W Y . P$ At d 1 O x C aZ ore v., v W s BEEf BEND RD DURHAM RD 5 0 e n 4 2 — Safety Pnority Corridors • _ City Limit Park 1'OOLE 0 Tigard DesioN ...........,.,r 1 �„�,.m..4.9+sn.wow N w w Go •moor.Tar.�w OW TSummary Sheets SW5 .-.- - thAvenue • s ,.,. _f -_, 9 •1.. • Summarizes safety priority .,1P •,---7,i' corridors , , ,o� 4 -; . • More comprehensive -N �:a . • r : •i _ version f o r t h e 15 locations 25'35 m h OR CRa3N RtMInORS .,Y 14 Yf Nii• in need of new projects ss x. 44.8396 31 .% 0 •cnou.c.eo 4uR.nc 4wv n r ull trtunt 4R ne. 0 114.4401 Collector ,x 31.03% 24.14% • Public-friendly overview of 1'4'y'11 '4f. � 'n"`"'•w""' "` 5 '� TOP cus44 LO.rnwn.c!ACTORS ° safety issues and ‘ eh ,i # NU countermeasures 0% 3.45% 0% 4.16R11CTIO. 60 RIOCV uw.O, ,nto O.uc 86.21% 13.79% 17 iRYaariO IIIVOlri INV.v YID r • Support for future grant applications and other efforts to find funding :SAFE a STREETS 0 `'ACTION The 5 E's—Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence 1� PLAN!I UP SW 68th/69th Avenue Sheets include: _ w p SW 681h169th Avenue- • Crash characteristics .....,h .;_�x M -„�, o OMB 1.4 5M • Modal and �.�- OY 3.�5X m , 862tx tim, n. - ' 4 •► environmental factors - -� •� =S 0 SW 68th169th Avenue ' �'�.a • Crash diagrams for key ,. .tt,.1 '1� intersections* - -, 1 Countermeasures* • • ---- tia 0 4 c_,_ try *Only for new project locations A'._ - - ;SAFE STREETS 'ACTION The 5 E's Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence PLAN 3 . Recent & Upcoming Engagement SAFE STREETS * LAN What's t - Safe Streets Action Plan? 1wY.Mc 6m ym.rYMMron �''-ea�.r rl.�>m�. Tigard SSA wp o,«vn M+nM 'Safety AkM COrrACri Recent Engagement• -=T�A- - �� � �,� , A ___ _ : :-.71- ilklmt 1.1111111.1. , ,::::--- , • July 21 : Task Force Meeting #3 -- r da• July 26: Tabling at Tigard Community ��" � - !�"- - t L0�-Mi � _ . ,►Mr Preparedness Fair ;KEPv."M° . l • • August/September: Online Comment (Safe Streets Action Plan I City of _ - —' >- ill -i rgra7 -iii ii, -- j I 4 I potA a ,11/1 1 , , The 5 E's—Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excelle !J 4. L . lr� Upcoming Engagement • August: • Online comment • City Council Briefing #3 • Project concepts for select corridors • Data dashboard development • Early/Mid Sept: Task Force #4 • Sept 20: Family Fun with Tigard Police & Public Works SAFE _ STREETS ACTION The 5 E's- Tigard"s Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence ••7PLAN 4 . Next Steps FSAFE TREETS �P*PLAN Next Steps October 2025 - Anticipated Plan Adoption Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) federal safety grants • An adopted plan makes Tigard eligible for future rounds of construction grants • Pursue construction funds in 2026 for an identified safety priority corridor !,,SAFE %STREETS k ACTION The 5 E's—Tigard's Community Promise:Equity•Environment•Economy•Engagement•Excellence '- PLAN 4. . 1 Questions ? SAFE STRE�E�pTS � _ PLANK