Ordinance No. 24-04 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
TIGARD CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 24-04
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE WASHINGTON SQUARE REGIONAL CENTER BOUNDARY
AND ADOPT THE BOUNDARY AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP (CPA2024-
00003)
WHEREAS,Title 6 of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan (UGMFP) requires local action
to adopt or revise a 2040 Center boundary;and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Planning Rule reforms known as the Climate Friendly and Equitable
Communities rules change the way that transportation analysis is conducted in Regional Centers;
WHEREAS, the City of Tigard desires to align the boundary of the Washington Square 2040 Regional Center
with the boundary of the Washington Square Regional Center Plan District; and
WHEREAS, this amended boundary will streamline the work associated with the Washington Square Regional
Center Update project.
NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Tigard City Council adopts the findings contained in "Exhibit A" to this Ordinance. The
findings and conclusions that are attached as Exhibit A are hereby adopted as the basis in
support of this Ordinance.
SECTION 2: Tigard City Council amends the Comprehensive Plan Map to include the Washington
Square 2040 Regional Center boundary as shown in "Exhibit B".
SECTION 3: Tigard City Council adopts the findings of the multimodal gap summary and highway
impact summary in "Exhibit C" in support of this boundary amendment as required by
the Transportation Planning Rule.
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the council, signature by the
mayor,and posting by the city recorder.
PASSED: By tA{1L4 II)1?1f 1Li vote of all council members present after being read by number
and title only, this 3 3-D-4 day of Orr'( ,2024
Jesse B. Raymundo, Deputy City Recorder
APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this 4 day of l J ,2024.
ORDINANCE No. 24- 0y
Page 1
Heidi Lueb,Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
4/29/2024
Date
ORDINANCE No.24-041
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS
I1
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
CASE NAME: Washington Square 2040 Regional Center Boundary Change
CASE NO.: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment CPA2024-00003
PROPOSAL: The City of Tigard proposes legislative amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Map to
change the Washington Square Regional Center 2040 Center boundary.
The proposed map amendments for the Planning Commission's review are included in
Attachment 1, and summarized below in Section IV of this report:
APPLICANT: City of Tigard
13125 SW Hall Blvd.
Tigard, OR 97223
ZONES: Citywide
LOCATION: Citywide
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 (Citizen Involvement), 2 (Land Use Planning); Oregon
Administrative Rules 660-012; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1.1.2, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3; and
Tigard Development Code Chapters 18.710 and 18.790.
SECTION II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the proposed amendments,with any alterations as
determined appropriate through the public hearing process.
WASHINGTON SQUARE 2040 CENTER BOUNDARY CHANGE CPA2024-00003
PAGE 1 OF 6
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PROJECT SUMMARY
The Metro region's long-range vision for growth management is built around the concept of a system of town
and regional centers, main streets,and station communities, connected by transportation corridors. This vision
was first introduced as part of the 2040 Growth Concept in 1995.
Subsequent to the adoption of this vision,Metro adopted the Urban Growth Management Functional Plan
(UGMFP),which provides the regulations that implement the 2040 Growth Concept.
When it was originally adopted, the 2040 Growth Concept included several key areas of Tigard including the
Washington Square Regional Center, the Downtown Tigard Town Center,Main Street, and corridors that
include 99W,Hall Blvd.,and Hunziker St.
Although Metro designated areas all around the region, there was never a requirement that local jurisdictions
adopt these centers. Instead,Metro incentivized their adoption by making grant funds contingent on local
adoption actions.The UGMFP does not currently include any criteria for the adoption or amendment of
boundaries.
The Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) rules adopted in July of 2022 reformed the state's
Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), codified at OAR 660-012. During the process of rulemaking, the
Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) had identified the need for"Climate Friendly
Areas"(CFAs) in cities across the state. Given that the goals for these areas were so similar to those in the 2040
Growth Concept,Metro successfully lobbied DLCD to not require CFAs in Metro cities. Instead, cities are
required to formally adopt the 2040 center boundaries.
The City of Tigard has already adopted these boundaries, but in the course of the Washington Square Regional
Center Update project, the project team became aware that the 2040 Center boundary does not match up with
the plan district boundary. Under the old TPR, this would not have created an issue,however the CFEC
rulemaking created an alternative method of transportation analysis inside adopted center boundaries.
If the plan district and town center boundaries are not aligned, this means the city must conduct two types of
transportation analysis with any kind of zoning change that increases density. For this reason, and for general
tidiness of the city's regulatory maps, city staff are proposing to amend the town center boundary to largely
match the plan district boundary.
SECTION IV. APPLICABLE CRITERIA, FINDINGS,AND CONCLUSIONS
STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES
State planning regulations require cities to adopt and amend Comprehensive Plans and land use regulations in
compliance with the state land use goals. For the proposed boundary amendment,only the relevant portions of
the Statewide Planning Goals are addressed below.
Statewide Planning Goal 1—Citizen Involvement:
This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and
changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents.
FINDING: The notice requirements for the amendment process as set forth in Section 18.710.110 (Type IV
Procedures) were met. A notice was posted at three public locations on February 27, 2024 and published in the
Tigard Times newspaper on February 28, 2024. A minimum of two public hearings will be held (one before the
WASHINGTON SQUARE 2040 CENTER BOUNDARY CHANGE CPA2024-00003
PAGE 2 OF 6
Planning Commission and the second before the City Council) at which an opportunity for public input is
provided. This goal is satisfied.
Statewide Planning Goal 2—Land Use Planning:
This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework.
FINDING: The Department of Land Conservation and Development has acknowledged the City's
Comprehensive Plan as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. This map amendment will bring the
2040 Center boundary into the City's Comprehensive Plan Map.
CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above and the related findings below, the Planning Commission
finds the proposed 2040 Center boundary change is consistent with applicable Statewide
Planning Goals.
OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 660 DIVISION 12
The rules in OAR 660-012-0325 provide specific criteria for the adoption or amendment of a 2040 Center
boundary.
(2) Cities and counties considering amendments to comprehensive plans or land use regulations to adopt
or expand a climate-friendly area as provided in OAR 660-012-0310 through OAR 660-012-0320, or a
Metro Region 2040 center,must make findings,including:
(b) A multimodal transportation gap summary as provided in section (4); and
(b) The multimodal transportation gap summary must include a highway impacts summary as
provided in section (5) if the designated climate-friendly area as provided in OAR 660-012-0315
or Region 2040 center contains a ramp terminal intersection, state highway, interstate highway,
or adopted ODOT Facility Plan.
FINDING: The city has prepared a multimodal gap summary and a highway impacts summary that support
the proposed boundary change.These documents are provided in Attachment 2.
CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above and the related findings below, the Planning Commission
finds the proposed 2040 Center boundary change is consistent with the applicable Oregon
Administrative Rules.
TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
State planning regulations require cities to adopt and amend comprehensive plans and land use regulations in
compliance with the state land use goals and consistent with their own adopted comprehensive plan goals and
policies. For the proposed 2040 Center boundary amendment„ only applicable comprehensive plan goals and
associated policies are addressed below.
Comprehensive Plan Goal 1: Citizen Involvement
Policy 1.1.2:The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land
use planning process.
WASHINGTON SQUARE 2040 CENTER BOUNDARY CHANGE CPA2024-00003
PAGE 3 OF 6
FINDING: The notice requirements for the amendment process as set forth in Section 18.710.110 (Type IV
Procedures) were met. A notice was posted at three public locations on February 27, 2024 and published in the
Tigard Times newspaper on February 28, 2024. A minimum of two public hearings will be held (one before the
Planning Commission and the second before the City Council) at which an opportunity for public input is
provided. This policy is satisfied.
Comprehensive Plan Goal 2: Land Use Planning
Policy 2.1.1: The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and
regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests.
FINDING: The proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment complies with all state and regional
requirements, as the previous findings indicate. The proposed map amendment also establishes the
Comprehensive Plan Map as the appropriate location for the 2040 Center boundary. This policy is satisfied.
Comprehensive Plan Goal 2: Land Use Planning
Policy 2.1.2:The City's land use regulations,related plans, and implementing actions shall be consistent
with and implement its Comprehensive Plan.
FINDING: As demonstrated in this report, the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Map are
consistent with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This policy is satisfied.
Policy 2.1.3: The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use
program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies.
FINDING: Copies of the proposed map amendments were sent to affected agencies and each agency was
invited to comment on the proposal, as required by Section 18.710.110 (Type IV Procedures) and discussed in
Section V of this report. .No comments were received. This policy is satisfied.
CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above,the Planning Commission concludes that the proposed 2040
Center boundary change is consistent with applicable provisions of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE
Section 18.790: Zoning Map and Text Amendments
18.790.020 Legislative Amendments
A.Approval process.A legislative amendment application is processed through a Legislative procedure,
as provided in Section 18.710.110.
FINDING:The proposed 2040 Center boundary change is legislative in nature. Therefore,the amendment will
be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in Section 18.710.110. This procedure requires
public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Public hearings will be conducted March
18, 2024 and April 23, 2024. This criterion is met.
B. A recommendation or a decision for a legislative amendment application may be based on
consideration of the applicable legal requirements. They may, but do not necessarily include: Oregon
Revised Statutes, Oregon Administrative Rules, one or more Statewide Planning Goals, Metro's Urban
Growth Management Functional Plan and any other regional plans.
WASHINGTON SQUARE 2040 CENTER BOUNDARY CHANGE CPA2024-00003
PAGE 4 OF 6
FINDING: Findings and conclusions are provided throughout Section IV above,for the applicable listed factors
on which the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council are based. This standard is
satisfied.
CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above,the Planning Commission concludes that the proposed 2040
Center boundary change is consistent with applicable provisions of the Tigard
Development Code.
SUMMARY
CONCLUSION: As shown in the findings above, the Planning Commission concludes that the proposed
2040 Center boundary change is consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals;
applicable Oregon Administrative Rules;applicable Tigard Comprehensive Plan goals and
policies, and the applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances.
SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS
The following agencies,departments, and jurisdictions had an opportunity to review the proposed amendments:
• City of Tigard Public Works
• City of Beaverton
• City of Durham
• City of King City
• City of Lake Oswego
• City of Portland
• City of Tualatin
• Metro
• Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD)
• Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)
• Oregon Department of Energy
• Oregon Department of Aviation
• Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
• Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
• Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries
• Washington County Department of Land Use and Transportation
• US Army Corps of Engineers
• Clean Water Services
• Beaverton School District#48
• Century Link
• Comcast
• NW Natural
• Oregon Health Authority
• Oregon Liquor Control Commission
• Portland General Electric
• Portland &Western Railroad
• Pride Disposal Company
• Tigard/Tualatin School District#23J
• Tigard Water District
• Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District
WASHINGTON SQUARE 2040 CENTER BOUNDARY CHANGE CPA2024-00003
PAGE 5 OF 6
• Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue
• Tualatin Valley Water District
• Tri-Met Transit Development
• Ziply Fiber
SECTION VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments on the boundary change have been received to date.
March 25, 2024
PREPARED BY: Hope Pollard
Associate Planner
March 25, 2024
APPROVED BY: Tom McGuire
Assistant Community Development Director
/24k -' March 25, 2024
APPROVED BY: Nathan Jackson
Planning Commission President
WASHINGTON SQUARE 2040 CENTER BOUNDARY CHANGE CPA2024-00003
PAGE 6 OF 6
in , ' —�
?- Attachment 1
riWashington Square Regional Center (WSRC):
..r,
L., Metro 2040 Growth Concept Existing and
Proposed Boundaries
I p
iii
\ • 1 GARI EN.HOME`RD
I� - - -I
� 11
I ♦ _ I
.. _ . ..
• •
• I
I I 1
♦ 1 ' U
I
♦, ♦ 1 II
• •
I I I I —
1 ♦ 1 —
II
�G��`N P� I ` ♦ I
1I •— ♦4, II
•
Q 1
•
IT
1 el
� ,♦ 1 �elkSRO
v 1 �—
• ) st
• ) .•*.
1 <<e 1
1 1,a' . r
•
•
. . - IN
No.
. • e(
* t% •
1 ••
0 7 --
elt
I I,
_
__« / .,
L.
40 I 1 ME
•
,---- .. i rl-----Ni_ • •
1
II Proposed WSRC Boundary I I ,� 1
!::s Existing WSRC Boundary I ,
II Tigard Urban Services Boundary �� I
Q
City of Beaverton �,P`'
City of Tigard ,:° L I TI
A c
Unincorporated Washington County �_�� 0 0.1 0.2
// —
Z-1-11 1 �T J ._•
Miles
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
K I TT E LS O N 851 SW 6th Avenue,Suite 600
&ASSOCIATES Portland,OR 97204
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
March 8, 2024 Project# 25837.009
To: Hope Pollard, Associate Planner; City of Tigard
From: Nick Gross, Erika Adams, Susan Wright, PE, PMP
RE: Washington Square Regional Center
Multimodal Gap Summary & Highway Impact Summary DRAFT
Washington Square Regional Center
The City of Tigard is proposing zone change and text amendments to the City Comprehensive Plan
(Reference 1) as part of the Maintain, Advance, Diversity, and Employment (MADE) Project. Several
proposed zone changes are located within the Washington Square Regional Center (WSRC) —a Metro
Region 2040 Center. Metro Region 2040 Centers.The City is also proposing a boundary amendment to
the WSRC. These proposed changes are triggering the need to conduct a Multimodal Transportation Gap
Summary and Highway Impact Summary according to Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0325
which applies to Climate-Friendly Areas (CFAs) and Metro Region 2040 Centers.
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION GAP SUMMARY
According to the latest round of draft amendments to Chapter 660 — Division 12 Transportation Planning
documented as part of the Climate-Friendly and Equitable Communities Corrections &Clarifications
Rulemaking, Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting 4, Cities and counties considering amendments to
comprehensive plans or land use regulations to adopt or expand a climate-friendly area as provided in
OAR 660-012-0310 through OAR 660-012-0320, or a Metro Region 2040 Center, must make findings as
provided in OAR 660-012-0325, including:
(a) A multimodal transportation gap study as provided in section (4); and
(b) The multimodal transportation gap study must include a highway impacts summary as
provided in section (5) if the designated climate-friendly area as provided in OAR 660-012-0315
or Region 2040 center contains a ramp terminal intersection, state highway, interstate highway, or
adopted ODOT Facility Plan."
The Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary summarizes the existing facility gaps for the automobile,
truck/freight, pedestrian, bicycle, Americans with Disability(ADA), and transit networks.
This Highway Impact Summary is intended to address the potential effects on ODOT facilities within the
Metro Regional Center or nearby that may occur from proposed changes to the current Project area.
1
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 2
Washington Square Regional Center Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary
Study Area
Proposed changes to an existing Metro Region 2040 Center are subject to transportation review per OAR
660-012-0325. The existing WSRC is partially located in the City of Beaverton, the City of Tigard and
Unincorporated Washington County. The existing boundary follows Fanno Creek to the west, Beaverton
Tigard Highway (OR 217) on the southwest, Redtail Golf Course to the northeast, and OR 141 to the east.
Proposed zone changes are located throughout the WSRC including along the Portland and Western
Railroad corridor to the southwest, Ash Creek and Beaverton Tigard Highway (OR 217) to the south, and
past SW Hall Boulevard to the southeast.
The primary boundary adjustments occur in the southwest and southeast areas of the WSRC. In these
locations, the proposed boundary is expanded. Smaller boundary expansions are also proposed along SW
Hall Boulevard. Figure 1 illustrates the study area including the existing and proposed WSRC boundary.
EXISTING ZONING
Existing designations for zoning located within the WSRC, and the following definitions are based on the
City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan.
• Professional Commercial (C-P)
- These areas are deemed appropriate for business and professional offices and related uses.
• Mixed Use Employment 1 (MUE-1) and Mixed Use Employment 2 (MUE-2)
- These areas are intended to accommodate development concepts characterized by retail, office,
and commercial services use, with business park and research facilities. High-density residential
development will be encouraged.
• Mixed Use Commercial (MUC)
- These areas are intended to accommodate high-density office buildings, retail, and service uses,
as well as mixed use developments and medium high and high-density (25 to 50 units to the net
acre) residential uses. Larger buildings with parking under, behind, or alongside the structures will
be encouraged.
• Mixed Use Residential 1 (MUR-1) and Mixed Use Residential 2 (MUR-2)
- The MUR-1 and MUR-2 zones are designed to apply to predominantly residential areas where
mixed-uses are allowed when compatible with the residential use. These areas are intended to
accommodate mixed uses with medium high and high-density residential development. Limited
commercial and retail services that provide benefits and amenities to the residents are allowed.
These areas should have a high degree of pedestrian amenities, recreation opportunities, and
access to transit.
1 Residential zoning is not included
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
2
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
SW Blakeney StLgiagbY
O
cril'Cindy St,� Camille Flernentary SW Garden Home Rd
e Dr Y d
';'e°' Park SW Marjorie Ln -o > m m
SO \eetesDr acv a _c 7
�Rd, GataralTer SW Whitf°� CO m
S S� \� tY hitford SW Ea le Ln CW f nmfuP Ter
N N
SWBel P'Ce a' g SWD IphSt
Fanno Cree o SW Crystal St o
Gree ay 2 Garden
v SW Crestwooq,0r
Nome
`. G1 --n
Qestwood� �a w SW Aiden St Park
L
C..), ; e
4.
Syy o Redtail �',r
-ti a 'stratus 51 ` Golf Course
o h
Fc
A.
r Koff ''.5
o C`R
o.
°o Center Wetlands r C\es
Natural Area / � S�
7 \\ SW Taylors Ferry Rd
Spk 15Green way y4//e o
Park > " a /VOf m
`P�c ¢ SW Blum Rd I.
N a I 1 SW Cedarcrest St
C
o m s� z m 1 . 1
C 1 I ki
o
a
. N _
o \ SW Borders St \
W Elmwood St
/ ✓ �$32) \ a
o I Q
I '--iSW Lehmann St -o
S , Crescent Grove I Metzger c.,4co
Q L 1 n Cemetery I
a 1 SW Coral St IPark
a 1 .. I SW Landau St
ER a 01 Sw Locust St —�
a o ; 5quore Rdce
p 1
° �o°a Loon 1 J. -.c Met i m
0 SW��oc 1 Q a� Elementay Q
0 1 n 0 I
aQt 11 a c3 SW OakSt ,•�
1 ss° a
° Englewood 1 < I
NS���t`d' Park 1 C SW Pine St
F.
1
1
s SW Cott° m 1 SW Shady[St - '• I I
i > 1 /
u�poo < Q 1 Bagan // I
8
U Q _o 11 I— h/ I Steve SW Steve St
t s 1 1 > I Street m
o`o " SW North Dakota St 'n 1 1 ro ert Q
4_ / �' P y
4- a 1\
°C N I m
F \
ao \___I 5W Pfaffle 5t
ko
SW Tigard St mss
Existing WSRC Boundary o 0.25 Miles 0
_` —II Proposed WSRC Boundary
1
School Grounds
Figure 1
Parks
Study Area
KKITTELSON Existing and Proposed WSRC
&ASSOCIATES Tigard, Oregon
3
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
GindySt'=' Camille ) II SW Garden Home Rd Cindy St„..-4-6-
Camille 1 f SW Garden Home Rd
eDr f I o q m = �eDr SW Mar 1 I o 0 m
= add / Park SW Marjorie Ln __ > > > > _ ad / Park Marjorie Ln —— > > > >
. -•' e or 3 / I /� —� Q Q Q Q n ���� estpr 3 / + /' J Q Q Q
0 SNa ect / I / , -o a qs S� ect / I / -o
�n S�,.... ta>r 01 m�� // 1 / SW Whitfo 1 SW Camille Ter ZI co co m cq '� ,1,1. L..\ crag 01 v� // I / ° oo
SW Whitfo SW Camille Ter C c,
SW 6 / /I / LV Eagle 1 n I S W Dolph St d S G tm / I /41/Eagle 1oip
'� P\t / i / S r Dr `'SW sed P / I 41/ n I� SW Dolph St dr Dr
SWC Fanno Cre�c o I / I m SW/y_ Fan no CreeK o I /I >
N3-,� Greenyvey + / h y�ayN °
O l I SW Crestwoo // I Garden 4IS
0O // f? i SW Crestwoo r// I n- m Garden FIs a�// Green I / l co Nome
csd� 1 y 1 aD/ I Gt -74 Park �d�Home I f aD/ I Gt y Park
n C 0 m SW Aiden St m� 7 n < /
0 m w SW Aiden St
m° L I Astwood / I m I estwood I
C9i I l I I� C9i I C^ 1 / Io
- - I m I / IC 1 m I 1 IC
1 �h` / Redtail I lis `' 1 y / Redtail 1 Kid,
l �o Golf Course ,——i/
1 N / Golf Course —
° 41 A ` I
50'1 �d tl \ ` (/ f 1 S° �d
r
x Ode x — Ore
\1 Kol! \\ \\ 1 S`IA m \1 xoll \\ N\ I S�
o tenter Wetlands \I ` A. N 1 0 tenter Wetlands
y\ \�
o-TD Natural Areala I + Natural Area `
Ju\ I I J 1
. I I I SW Taylors FerryRd
/ o I
SW Taylors Ferry Rd / 5) Y
/ Q `SAY[, �/ 0 / Q 0
5W Selller% // �1 X74//ejVa o Q $W Sett_ / Q B/�pr ° ¢>
I Z I SW Cedgrcrest St 2
R 4 I Z Blum Rd L j I— SW Cedarcrest St
II
I + al
I t� 1 I oI 1 1
o Sh'8urnett Lri \ �� E > I l S.4'Surnett Ln \ s� �� I I �I
\ o \ .• •l I ?I \ I • I SW Chestnut St
x yOC \ Gco —,� \ •• �`f SW Chestnut St y0� \ N --- ��I �1
.S SW Wil \\ \ /f I �\ c� 1� 4 SW Wilke \\ //f I \ \ SW Elmwood St
o o ker — O / / I r � SW Borders St \ SW Elmwood St o �r `\ O / \ t NI' \
a Greenway �a�� �� \\ \ Greenway Via/��® •
\
IMEIP
, Park �� „� .\ SW Lehmann St I �I Park �� I `f
a 1 P, Crescent Grove \ 1 , .�\ Crescent Gro
1 y4 ` (Metzger s �c \ \. \ I Metzger
�' �� Al SG ��� 1 Cemetery `\ IParkJ S o��� �\ • Cemetery
(7 X N ¢ • SW Coral St C) SG :V I Park
Y Q 1 S�. h SW Landau St > Q + �S� 111""711,&%......k7
h SW Landau St >SW Locust StCD
o rores Gena N1 fro ` \\ Q \ m MoI
oresbend OSWJro,5 e. \ im� S �il'o° `o � I > SWMapleleaf5t °p > SW Mapleleaf St
`� Q ° ��\'• 1 < "' o- \
NI
��°OdIO° o + �\ \\ \� Im zoi'\y°odC° o \ max 6od0a \ S .• \� e °c dptao `���o Englewood IIII/4llrjfiQ)
\ \ �, I ��ooEnglewood
o �S \ SW Pine St U, �S \� SW Pine St
-g, SW S2 Park \\; I SW S� Park
Cotton"o m Ln�''� \ LI SW Spruce St '21-Cotton yo n� ° �\ AIIII
���\��j_ SW Spruce St
'21- ., 'N \
I
N.
> 3 0 0 S W Steve St > > 5'- 0 ° •
SW Steve St >
o Q — Q > < Q Q • > Q mSW North Dakota St° SW North Dakota St0 QgestDr \ 0estDr 5W Pfaffle 5t" S� SW Pfaffle St"' N
Existing Zoning Planned Zoning
Professional Commercial \� Mixed-Use Em to ment 1 r Washington Square Analysis Subdistricts o 0.25 0.5 Miles p y r�+ Center Residential
Residential-B 0Mixed-Use Residential 1 Mixed-Use Commercial; MU-CBD A Apartment
Parks
Residential-D \\ Mixed-Use Residential 2 Mixed-Use Employment Design Review
Water
Residential-E Parks-Recreation :k.„... Mixed-Use Residential � Metzger Main Street Figure 2
Mixed-Use Commercial Parks-Recreation
Zoning
KKITTELs0N
,Ti ardOre on
&ASSOCIATES 9 9
4
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 5
Washington Square Regional Center Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary
PROPOSED ZONING
Proposed zoning designations located within the WSRC, and the following definitions are based on the
City of Tigard code amendments:
■ Mixed Use Commercial (MUC)
- The MUC zone is a consolidation and overhaul of the two current MUC zones intended to allow a
wide range of commercial and residential activity as standalone or mixed-use development.
■ Mixed-Use Residential (MUR)
- The MUR zone is a consolidation and overhaul of the two current MUR zones where
predominantly residential uses are allowed along with mixed-uses that are directly supportive of
the residential use.
■ Mixed Use Employment (MUE)
- The MUE zone is a consolidation of all three current MUE zones into a single zone intended to
allow the broadest range of low impact uses to locate near each other including residential,
commercial, and some industrial and manufacturing uses.
In addition to the above base zones, parts of the plan district will also be contained within subdistricts, as
follows:
■ Design Review Subdistrict
- Development in the Design Review Subdistrict is subject only to the use standards and height
standards provided in this chapter. Development in this subdistrict is evaluated using the
discretionary criteria provided in the new Chapter 18.725, Development Design Reviews, in the
place of other standards.
■ Apartment Subdistrict
- Development in the Apartment Subdistrict is subject to the use and development standards of the
MUR base zone, with the exceptions of housing types and building height.The only housing type
allowed in the apartment subdistrict are apartments and development is required to be at least
three stories tall.
■ Metzger Business Subdistrict
- Development in the Metzger Business Subdistrict is subject to the use and development
standards of the MUC base zone, except for building height and residential uses. Development in
this subdistrict is intended to be smaller in scale than development in the MUC zone outside the
subdistrict and residential is only allowed as part of a mixed-use building.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
5
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 6
Washington Square Regional Center Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary
Planned Transportation Improvements
There are several planned transportation improvements facilities and investments within the study area
that support vehicular capacity improvements, mode shift from single occupancy vehicles (SOV) to active
transportation modes, and safety improvements.These improvement projects are documented in the
plans and projects summarized below with additional detail described in Appendix A.
■ City of Tigard Transportation System Plan 2022
■ City of Tigard Safety Action Plan 2019
■ TriMet Pedestrian Plan 2020
■ Washington County Transportation System Plan 2019
■ Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan 2021-2024
■ Metro Regional Transportation Plan 2023
Existing Transportation Network
The following sections describe specific modal infrastructure for automobile, pedestrian, bicycle, and
transit networks, and identifies gaps in those networks. These summaries rely on information published in
the City of Tigard 2020 Transportation System Plan, ODOT's TransGlS website, and Metro Regional Land
Information System (RLIS) Discovery website.
AUTOMOBILE NETWORK
The Project area is generally bounded by OR 217 and Fanno Creek to the west, OR 217 to the south, OR
141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)to the east and SW Greenburg Road running
through the center.
State Facilities
OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)
OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway) is a 2-lane Urban Minor Arterial with paved
shoulders and a posted speed of 40 mph between OR 217 (MP 2.7) and Beaverton City limits (MP 3.4) and
30 mph from Tigard City limits (MP 3.4)to Oak Street (MP 4.25). Two-way left turn (TWLT) lanes and
dedicated left-turn lanes are located intermittently.
According to ODOT's TransGlS, the AADT on OR141 within the Project area, near TriMet WES Commuter
Rail At-Grade Crossing (MP 2.57)to SW Greenburg Road (MP 3.31), is approximately 24,861 with a range
of 20,001 to 30,000. OR 141 AADT from SW Greenburg Road (MP 3.31) to SW Washington Drive (MP 3.33)
is approximately 13,708 with a range of 10,001 to 15,000. OR 141 AADT from SW Washington Drive (MP
3.33) to SW Oak Street (MP 4.25) is approximately 10,489 with a range of 10,001 to 15,000. OR 141 AADT
from SW Oak Street (MP 4.25) to OR 217 (MP 4.69) is approximately 12,296 with a range of 10,001 to
15,000.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
6
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 7
Washington Square Regional Center Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary
OR217 (Beaverton Tigard Highway)
OR 217 (Beaverton Tigard Highway) is a 4-lane Urban Other Freeway with a posted speed of 55 mph
within the WSRC. (OR 141 MP 3.81 to MP 5.64). Shoulders are provided along OR 217 within the WSRC.
According to ODOT's TransGlS the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) within the WSRC on OR 217, from
the OR141/OR217 interchange (MP 3.82) to the OR217/OR210 interchange (MP 4.27) is approximately
90,690. OR 217 from the OR 217/OR 210 interchange (MP 4.27) to SW Greenburg Road (MP 4.95) has an
AADT of 103,779. OR 217 from SW Greenburg Road (MP 4.95) to the OR 217/99W interchange (MP 5.9)
has an AADT of 107,364.
OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road)
OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road) is a 4-lane Urban Minor Arterial with a posted speed of 35 mph within the
Project area. SW Scholls Ferry Road is considered an ODOT facility before SW Cascade Avenue (MP 9.03)
to OR 141 (MP 9.6). Sidewalks and bike lanes are available on both sides from MP 9.03 to 9.13. Sidewalk
and bike lanes are provided on the east side of the road from MP 9.32 to OR 141 (MP 9.6).
Interchanges
All OR 141/OR 217 ramp terminals, OR 217/OR 210 northbound and southbound ramp terminals and
OR217/SW Greenburg Road northbound and southbound ramp terminals are located in the WSRC
boundary. The OR 217/99W terminal is located within 100 feet east of the WSRC boundary.
Primary Local Jurisdiction Streets
The primary local jurisdiction streets within the WSRC are Greenburg Road, Olsen Road, Blume Road, Oak
Street, Locust Street, Cascade Avenue, Lincoln Street, and Nimbus .A summary of the roadway
characteristics including functional classification, number of lanes, posted speed and on-street parking for
the primary local streets is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Primary Local Jurisdiction Street Characteristics
Roadway Jurisdiction Functional Number of Posted Speed On-Street
Classification Travel Lanes (MPH) Parking
SW Greenburg Road Washinton County Arterial 2 35 No
SW Oleson Road Washington County Arterial 2 35 No
SW Blume Road Tigard Collector 2 15 No
SW Oak Street Tigard Collector 2 25 No
SW Locust Street Tigard Collector 2 30 Partial
SW Cascade Avenue Tigard Collector 2 30 No
Kittelson&Associates,Inc.
7
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 8
Washington Square Regional Center Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary
SW Lincoln Street Tigard Collector 2 N/A No
SW Nimbus Avenue Beaverton Collector 2 35 No
Truck/Freight Network
OR 217 is classified as a freight route in the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) and is part of the National
Freight network. OR 217 within the WSRC is identified as a Reduction Review (ORS 366.215) Route;
however, it is not identified as a High Clearance Route. OR 217 is a Critical Urban Freight Corridor.
Trucks compose approximately 3.7 percent of traffic on OR 217 within the WSRC. None of the local streets
within the WSRC are part of the National or OHP freight network.
PEDESTRAIN NETWORK AND NETWORK GAPS
The City of Tigard's TSP documents the pedestrian network and network gaps within the WSRC. For areas
within the WSRC but outside of the City of Tigard city limits, Metro's RLIS data was used to populate the
pedestrian network facilities and gaps.
Figure 3 illustrates the existing pedestrian network for the WSRC.
Within the WSRC, there are streets with complete sidewalks on both sides, one side, and streets with no
complete sidewalks.WSRC also contains a connection to Fanno Creek Trail from SW Creekside Place off of
SW Nimbus Avenue within the City of Beaverton's portion of the WSRC.
The presence of sidewalks along SW Hall Boulevard vary throughout the WSRC. Sidewalks are curb time
and also set back from the curb with street trees or landscaping.
SW Hall Boulevard has sections with sidewalk on both sides and a majority of sections with a sidewalk on
only one side, and there are sections that have no sidewalk on either side.A large section of no sidewalks
exist on SW Hall Boulevard from SW Oak Street to SW Spruce Street. Other smaller gaps exist along SW
Hall Boulevard.
Larger portions of SW Washington Square Road, SW Oak Street,and SW Cascade Avenue, and other
neighborhood routes do not provide sidewalks. Most of these streets are located in residential areas to
the southeast of the WSRC.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
8
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
e 40 _ D indySt� Camille Elementary J I SW Garden Home Rd
CindOlkity
y Si Camille Elementary I SW Garden Home Rd
= e�" m / Park SW Marjorie Ln I > > e ? 'Oe Or / Park SW Marjorie Ln —_4 I I > C C
t�Ves\9r / I < Q Q Q n ��� es\pr 3 / I / Q Q ),>(
CDS. S� pect Cal Ter •• Ds/S� ect d T I / SW Whitfo� SW Camille Ter m w
o � a� �t / I / rr rr i • SW Camille Terco co ,,'' c". o dg �G� / I c `v o
S� Ga m // I hitford S� co. hitford / co
SW 66 P / ag n I� SW Dolph St " w or Dr ` SW 8e�P / SWEag4e LC\ I/ � SW Dolph St or Dr
SW Ly Farm°Cre�c Il
I / ' Fanno Cre�c 4 I / I Q
II SW,
1 / Garden MS
//20',,,,/ Greenyvc7y / Garden MS 4'.(74 Gre�n SW Cresiwoo�DP� I
//Q J SW Crestwoo �r//
a I Home i CJ } 1 Home
��d i } / I t 7 Park -s\d'. I y I t
G
n < o m SSW Alden St ¢,c I n C?� / I m SW Aiden St Park
¢° — I estwood / I 0 I estwood }E
C9i I I / I� C�i I C) I / l0
1 lir
/ }U 1 m I / 1U
v / Redtail I pis v J��C /
Redtail 1 -if,
l \ Golf Course I- �d ` 1 coo Golf Course r—.1
d
4 S\, a 1 -a \ I �, S r9-
o 1 I Cie° x 5 1 ore o
t \ \ I o S`O tZ-o_ \ \ \ I o SNS
1 Koll \\ fj
I s 1 Ko// \\ \\ I S
o Venter Wetlands \ /, . \ 1 q o Venter Wetlands /,
o I Natural Area j \ \ I co 0 I Natural Area \\ \\ I o
Greenway D I "\ I I Green way P I \ I
Elementary J 1 \ I Elementary J I
/ • \ SW Taylors Ferry Rd / m \ SW Taylors Ferry Rd
/ ji k_ o / ¢> sCY y n`
SW Setter // //B/� o Q SW Setter / n 4//B�. o Q
_ 4 I SW Blum Rd L___ __6
4
Ili/
•
SW Blum Rd L——— o < I z } I SW Cedarcrest St CO
I 1 y� SW Cedgrcrest St CO 1 1 Ica
} 9 I I
o 3'4/Burnett LO + o I } Sin,
Burnett Lri \ /i _E m I I
° 4 l SW Chestnut St
C \ ° l I SW Chestnut St OC, AI \\
• Q• � \\� • /j 1 N �` 1 Q SW Wilke / I C 1�
SW Wil
`o ke'7s —\ 4 / ✓\ f cit \ SW Elmwood St o rkr _\ O �� SW Elmwood St
9 r I SW orders St \
Greenway f 01L 1139 I Greenway f �a ! 1 \ti
Park \ �� + S e ma St r \-J Park \ A� OP
SW Lehman St \�
o s� y�P, 11 _• Crescent Grove !Metzger s ��+ 1 •
Crescent Grove !Metzger
\� /Z �� 1 •
h o tJ SGr� 1 ¢ Cemetery .� S Coral St !Park C) `J Sero 1 ¢ * Cemetery SW Coral St 'Park
m l 14• t e I as C 5 1 �' -, 0 • I as
Y ���Q 4. �,S 1 Q I—� SW Landau St Q ���Q o ��S 1 4 r• • SW Landau St Q
.� o <� \ m .2S. • - :• w'__SW_LocustSt o ti m • • e - :• •
31 ores 6end�t s9a V�fro 11 �� Metzger I odes 5a1.1a �9a V1 fro 11 f Metz e I ,
lrirt ��
o� S 1 //// > �° S 1 r //i%/ I > SW Mapleleaf leleaf 5 t
,�o Cion estoga ' - °R 1
/Elementary + Q SW Mapleleai 5t Ooeestoga ¢ 1 Elementary I Q p
o40`�ood to d�� ao° 111 34168. -
I
SW oak St 1 ,e��ood Looms dot ao° 111 rWOI -
��°° Englewood 1 1 ,�°° Englewood 1
o, SW S�\� Park 11 SW Pine St U SW S�.k`� Park 11 SW Pine St
L 1 1 1 C�
Cotton y°o ° 11 SVShady L�^\\ LI SW Spruce St Cotton y° n� ° 11 SW Shady L \ SW Spruce St
8 u\ o 1 agan i
N N ELI u1Q o 1 =agan_ / \....
LI
,0 > 0 11 -Park-,---1 N\\ l SW Steve St ° >•")
> 7 0 1�� ' �/ N\\ I SW Steve St e >
o Q " Q N a > < Q Q •
N I > Q
1 y Ln \ QL SW North Dakota St J u, \ Q� c
o � SW North Dakota Sty v I >Q - i v I >Q
_. Q, I -,o...` r� Q, \ I —o, n
F \\ I �� N c�estDr� \\\ 1
w
�0c�est Dr \ I - ' �t \_`� SW Pfeifle St'"'">)‹
C
S�
\_ice SW Pfaffle St"' 0
Existing Pedestrian Network Planned Pedestrian Network
- Existing Sidewalk on Both Sides I Transit Center Planned Pedestrian Corridor 0 0.25 0.5 Miles 0
I I I
Existing Sidewalk on One Side School Grounds Planned Neighborhood Greenway
- No Existing Sidewalks Parks Planned Trail
- Existing Trails r_`+ -. Washington Square Analysis Center = Proposed Active Transportation Connection Figure 3
Fr KITTELSON Pedestrian Facilities
1\ &ASSOCIATES Tigard, Oregon
9
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 10
Washington Square Regional Center Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary
BICYCLE NETWORK AND NETWORK GAPS
The City of Tigard's TSP documents the bicycle network and network gaps within the WSRC. For areas
within the WSRC but outside of the City of Tigard city limits, Metro's RLIS data was used to populate the
bicycle network facilities and gaps.
Figure 4 illustrates the existing bicycle and planned bicycle network for the WSRC.
On-street bicycle lanes are located on SW Hall Boulevard, a small portion of SW Scholls Ferry Road near
SW Hall Boulevard and SW Greenburg Road near Bagan Park and from SW Washington Square Road and
the bridge over OR 217.
For the remaining street network within the study area, bicyclists must share the roadway with vehicles.
SW Nimbus Avenue and SW Cascade Avenue have shared lanes but are also considered high traffic
streets. SW Oak Street, SW Locust Street and SW Washington Square Road have shared lanes but are
considered moderate traffic streets.There are three spans of roadways that are considered difficult
connections, two are along SW Greenburg Road and one is along SW Schools Ferry Road.
A majority of SW Scholls Ferry Road in the study area is considered a difficult bicycle connection, partial
conventional bike lanes but there are gaps throughout. Conventional bike lanes are available on both
sides of SW Hall Boulevard.
As shown in Figure 4, three active transportation connections are proposed to address the existing gap
from the Fanno Creek Trail to Metzger Elementary;the planned connections create a connection that
passes through Bagan Park and over OR 217. There is also a planned trail along SW Oak Street.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
10
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
4. d` _ I �� O` _
p Indy St Camille €lementary J I` SW Garden Home Rd Cindy St Camille Elementary ) I SW Garden Home Rd
e I I o m m z ��e SW Mar I I o m m
=
'Pe pr
/ Park SW Marjorie Ln __ > > > > _ e� / Park Marjorie Ln > > > >
e Qr I /J J4 ¢ Q Q Q ��o e5�pr 1 / ---� ¢ Q Q/ j ! -
I % SW Whitfo SW Camille Ter .3 00 -, ;oma (i-\da$`I//
I ! o/ Ihiord p SW Whitf SW Camille Terco`_ S I hitford !
SWP SWSW Dolph St " arDr SW Bei / SW Eagle Ln I� SW Dolph St " Or Dr
SWC Fanno Creic D 1 / m SWly Fanno Cre�c I / >
Q �� Green 1 co Garden 41S
�0�iy/O Gre yvc7Y C I S W Crestwooq[)/./!/ m Home
MS Ph/7jQ 1 y V �W Cresiw��Dr !! I
6� 1 _3-
c., I C,1 72 ^ 6� l I / I C 1 m Home
s� I ! ParkI / r Park
LU 0 o .7SWAidenSt I C U m C9 wSWAiden St
,iv' 1 Westwood / E �a — I yes wood / 1
Chi I n I ! 0 COY I n I / I
I m I / V ! m I / I v
`' l ''.. " / Redtail Ki ` l / Redtail I Ki
4 % \ Golf Course ^— cf-d i % / Golf Course ^—
1 s r� I �, s rid
Fc 10h4. I O\6° x 1 ` 1 Ode o
1 Koff \ 5 S 1 1 Koff \ N I S S
o Venter Wetlands 1\ /�� \\ I o Venter Wetlands 1\ /. N
0 I Natural Area / \ \ I m o I NaturalArea l \\ \\ I m
Greenway P I I I Green way D 1 \ I I
Elementary /J I SW Taylors Ferry Rd Elementary /1 a) �\ I SW Taylors Ferry Rd
/ .r Spy i, O / Q Spy O
SW Settler // . -0 0. 0 5W Settler / a a4,/e4. L, 0 Q>
Blum Rd L——— Blum Rd
L--- — 6
a 71,
1 •% SW I 1— 4I
z SW I �* SW Cedarcrest St CO
1 a I I c SW Cedarcrest St I ° I °°
o Si Burnett Lc)
\ s� m I I Sh'8urnett Lri \ �� E I
O� \\ _ I SW Che nut St O� \\ a 1 SW Chestnut St
9 SW Wil \\ 7-• /j /� SW Wil \\ /j I ry (-
9 -\ O / ✓� 1 SW Borders St \ o r `�
e ° SW Flmwo dSt 9 e O / I ° SW'orders St \
aSW Elmwood St
a °C Greenway *a N \, i. Greenway I �a� \
`� SW Lehmann St I \\I Park 1 ik�/1 .. SW Lehman St \�I
ai n Park .1 ��� 1 Crescent Grove Metzger s 1 �&+ 1 j Crescent Grove (Metzger
I m 1 o*c' 1 Q Cemetery m /i .1 p��5 1 •• Cemetery
N r o Soh 1 SW Coral St (Park o SGh 1 a r. SW Coral St (Park
Y Q'El 1 S . I SW Landau St > Q m 1 �S C'•
a SW Landau St >
�,. i 1 0 • 1 Q a4 �, i \ . . . I Q
ta4 r� •• ar Rd SW Locust St It r� \ °. • . - t. SW .cu
•
ores BenaOt 4O V�1.r-0,,.11.. 11 0 Mej r I o�es 5a1.1 O. W fro 11 0 MetzgerjI
ado S1 l //// > �o S 1 rr %//i//r > S W Mapleleaf 5 t
:S @onestogaI 0� 11 l Elementary— Q SW MapleleafSt Conestogal 1 l /Elem.entary I Q p
'e6 ��0od l 0 1 _ I ood L o Il 1 u`�
o 006 dpi ao 1 SW Oak St �� e�� 046 app ao \ .—_W5�_ t____.^
a z °o Englewood 1 I soo Englewood 1 I
'' SW Sit' Park 11 I SW Pine St SW S�i�� Park 11 a\ SW Pine St
1 I 1 f
Cottony cn m 1 WShady Ln�-^- L SW SpruceSt
'21-Cotton . a 1 SWShady L ^� SW Spruce St
C 0 1 i I o > 1
8 uAQ o -=>( 1 Sagan �i N\ LI �Q !,,,
L 1 =agar_ �N L
> 7 0 11 Parl��'r \\\ I SW Steve St m > > 7 0 1�~ — }/ N.
I SW Steve St o >
Q Q I > Q Q Q I > Q
1 NIN
cr. I Q� SW North Dakota St N Y I Q CO
40 SW North DakotaSto 1 \� 1 >� o 1 \� '�
��`a�estDr� \�\\ + , ��oestDr� \`\\
S� _ _ �' _ SW Pfaffle St
Existing Bicycle Network Planned Bicycle Network
- Existing Multi-Use Path Existing Shared Lane on Q Transit Center . . Planned Major Street Bikeway 0 0.25 0.5 Miles 0
® Buffered Bike Lane Moderate Traffic Through Street I I I
Existing Shared Lane on Low Parks Planned Neighborhood Greenway
- Existing Bike Lane Traffic j Though Street
g % School Grounds Planned Trail
- Existing Difficult Connection
Existing Shared Lane on High r j Washington o Proposed Active Transportation Connection Figure 4
Traffic Through Street
'11 Square Analysis
Bicycle Facilities
W KITTELSON on Tigard, Oregon
\ &ASSOCIATES 9
11
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 12
Washington Square Regional Center Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) GAPS
The following section summarizes the presence and compliance of ADA facilities located along the state
highways within the WSRC.
Pedestrian Ramps
The following intersections do not meet ADA ramp compliance for all corners of the intersection.
• OR141(SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Oak Street
• OR141(SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Spruce Street
• OR141(SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Pfaffle Street
• OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road)/SW Washington Square Road
• OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road)/OR 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) southbound terminal
• OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road)/SW Cascade Avenue
• OR 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) southbound terminal/SW Greenburg Road
• OR 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) northbound terminal/SW Greenburg Road
The following intersections do not meet ADA ramp compliance for some corners of the intersection.
• OR141(SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Palmblad Road
• OR141(SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Washington Drive-
• OR141(SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Hemlock Street
• OR141(SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Locust Street
• OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road)/OR 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) northbound off ramp
Push Buttons
The following push buttons are in "good" functional condition and have audible signal, making them in
compliance to ADA standards:
• OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/OR210 (Scholls Ferry Road)
• OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Palmblad Road
• OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Greenburg Road
• OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Locust Road
The following push buttons are in "poor" conditions.
• OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Eliander Lane
• OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/Washington Square Target Entrance
• OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Oak Street
• OR141 (SW Hall Boulevard/Beaverton-Tualatin Highway)/SW Oak Street
• OR210 (Scholls Ferry Road)/SW Washington Square Road
• OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road)/OR 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) northbound off ramp
• OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road)/OR 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) southbound terminal
• OR 210 (Scholls Ferry Road)/SW Cascade Avenue
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
12
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 13
Washington Square Regional Center Multimodal Transportation Gap Summary
• OR 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) southbound terminal/SW Greenburg Road
• OR 217 (Beaverton-Tigard Highway) northbound terminal/SW Greenburg Road
ADA information including ramp compliance, push button information is provided on ODOT's TransGlS
website: ODOT TransGIS (state.or.us).
TRANSIT NETWORK AND NETWORK GAPS
Transit service in the WSRC is provided by TriMet. There are three bus lines and one commuter rail line
that serve the area.This includes one frequent service TriMet bus route (Line 76). The core area of the
WSRC is also identified as a transit-oriented development (TOD) priority area.
Table 2 includes service details for each transit route within the WSRC.
Each of the bus routes serves the Washington Square Transit Center, which is located on SW Blum Road
on the northeast corner of Washington Square Mall. The WES Commuter Rail serves WSRC by the SW Hall
Boulevard and SW Nimbus Avenue WES Station includes a park and ride. Figure 5 illustrates the existing
and planned transit network.
Table 2:Transit Routes Serving Washington Square Regional Center
Route Operator Service Days Hours Frequency
WES 5:15 AM -9:30 AM
Commuter TriMet Weekdays 45 minutes
Rail 3:30 PM —7:45 PM
6:00 AM —8:30 PM (weekdays) 60 minutes (weekdays)
45 TriMet All Days
10:30 AM —7:45 PM (weekends) 75 minutes (weekends)
56 TriMet All Days 5:15 AM to 1:10 AM 30 minutes
5:15 AM to 11:15 AM
(weekdays)
62 TriMet All Days 45 minutes
6:20 AM to 11:10 PM
(weekends)
76 TriMet All Days 6:00 AM — 11:50 PM 15 minutes
15 minutes(PM peak)
78 TriMet All Days 4:30 AM — 1:10 AM 30 minutes (all other
times)
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
13
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
Cindy St''''7-''''6'
Camille e J 1 S W Garden Home Rd Cindy St'=�{ Camille J I SW Garden Home Rd
�\reDr ve Park SW Marjorie Ln __ I I j ° o a _ �teDr -C Park SW Marjorie Ln __�I + j > a) >
S��\��a°ye p /�� 1 ,J_ J a ms SN�jtr�e°�es�t7 /// I /J� Q -c - a
%SNy�dqGa�d"���tr // I j SW Whiffo SW Camille Ter07
m 00 A d� a�at �� // I / o c . ,c
SW Whitf SW Camille Ter i m N
/ _ ,.,34.\'' G ° I /
SW 8�P`t // i SwEagle4n I� SW Dolph St w i dr Dr `'SSW BelP\t // I St agle4n I� SW Dolph St i ar Dr
Sally Farm Cre�c Q 1 I * > t Scaly_ Fan no Cre�c 4 I / I N m .?
hq�// Greeny�ay I I o Garden �41s ha?�rj/ Greeny�ay I SW Cres w [V 1 ��a L Garden
O 1 G 1 SWnCrestwo°dd I 3 " a / I °Od Ms
1 r I CO Home V 1 c Cri I m Home
cas I I Gt Park ids I h I v. / 1 Gt Park
�' L1 n <? q C9 �SWAldenSt o� I n C ; q m �SWAidenSt
�° 76 1 °stwood 1 _ 76 r estwooct I 0
C9� 1 Q. I la C9 I n I / I a
4.. 1 m I I ) 3 I m I // IU
c f y Redtail I cif `' 1 y 56 Redtail 1 -if
I coo N. I Golf Course -.1 1 a i N. Goff Course r-
b l -o \ 1 fid' -a 4 -o \ / f 1 2d
sa 1 N. / 1 C esor Fc l N 1 C esor
N
1 Kol! 1` `\ 1 S� \1 Koff \
\ '`� I SNS
ot enter Wetlands el 1 'I\ /�� N I o tenter Wetlands 1 /N� `�
O INatural Area i N1 I + Natural Area / ",` I
1 IV• 1 I 1 / ' I
/ a NJ S W Taylors Ferry Rd / a S W Taylors Ferry Rd
SW Sett, // 7 ��y4//�/ o > SW Sett, / 7 ��H4//B o >
erg / o �d Q Sett,_
/ o ��
a 1 S cn
W Blum L---
Tial
i 4 I SW81umRd L--- t z I I- o
z a I I- I ° I S W Cedgrcrest St
1 I SW Cedgrcrest St 1 :a-
u,
°
11(?
IO S -11/Burnett Lr `r, w E a I l 2~1 SW \ � E m I I .1 ,n
V I Burnett Lri \ 1� O I .1
1 C SW Chestnut St
pC �\ 0 �a 7 SW Chestnut St yp N N -, _ d 7 L v)1
.Q SW mike \_ N. e��� I - 1� Q SW W11ke \\- �' //j I ° SW Borders St - / SW Elmwood St
`o o y O (� �� I SW Borders St \ SW Elmwood St ° r \ Q �� \
Greenway f \�( \ ° Greenway qa� '® -� ,, \
' Park S`ro 4 n Crescent Grove 76 SW Lehmann St \tel Parke n Crescent Grove
SW Lehmann St \`I
s 1 1Metzger s @ �c ij!Metzger
`1 ��5� 11 a Cemetery r SW Coral St Q tl SC'
41 Cemetery SW Coral St
cD IPark 'Park
i3 m ° 1 , t 1 5 I m 5 1 Z1- ° /.! I m
Y O4� m ` /�- 1 �o -� SW Landau St Q OPS ��S 4 4 1.c7)
o SWk Landau St Q
O r' \ (9 �S uaro Rd SW Locust St I o t- @ �S Square Rd 4 SW Locust St
V`4q 4 �� p o I V`44 1 �, p m I
ores gena y1 frog 11 a
-o s m o°res gena O S�fr°� 11 a
r 1 0
m > 1 a°i o` 1 > SW MapleleafSt
�o¢ 14 o`o + SW Mapleleaf St w ¢ a Q
IL�S good L o 1 3 S� 1 pod L o 11 3 � 50
ro °ob aft ao 1 SW oak St I e(� °O� dot ao 1 c-, SW Oak St
��°° Englewood 4 I "' °° Englewood 4 I
m SW S��S Park 11 SW Pine St S��`r� Park 11 SW Pine St
SW
L 1 I ` 4 I
Cottony. n ° 1 SW Shady Ln i"\ ! SW Spruce St Cottons n ° 1 SW Shady Ln i \ l SW Spruce St
° > 1 i \ I o > 1 i N ' I
R �Q o 1 Sagan ,,i N\ LI �Q° o 4 Sagan,.i N. LI
o Q 0 11 - Park ~�� \\� SW Steve St Q Q 0 11 - -p�k/ `N I SW Steve St m Q
Q N. Q N 1
SW North Dakota St(/'
o SW North Dakota St ` >Q N. I '-',°><
D ? h N Q m )` Lj \ Q in
y \
� test Dr
\�
-z ,��G�est bre �\ z
SW Rfaffle Sf SNSN _I SW Pfoffle St
76
Existing Transit Network Planned Transit Network
- Existing Peak Hour Transit 0 WES Station Planned Frequent Transit Route o 0.25 0.5Mles 0
Existing Frequent Transit . . Planned Regular Transit Route
Q Transit Center
- Existing Regular Transit -,_, i TriMet WES Commuter Rail
- Existing TriMet WES Commuter Rail r-J ' Washington Square Analysis Center
Pr i TOD Priority Area
Figure 5
Fr KITTELSON
Transit Facilities
N` &ASSOCIATES Tigard, Oregon
14
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 15
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY OF CLIMATE FRIENDLY AREA
As described previously, the City of Tigard is proposing zone and text amendments to areas located
within the WSRC. The City is also prosing to increase the size of the WSRC by modifying the existing
WSRC boundary.
Existing Development Capacity
Section 18.320.1 of the City's Development Code sets the existing standards for Commercial Zone
Development Standards for Nonresidential Development including Mixed-Use Employment (MUE),
Mixed-Use Residential (MUR) and Mixed-Use Commercial (MUC).The existing Commercial Zone
Development Standards for Nonresidential Development that are proposed for amendment are shown in
Table 3.
Table 3: Existing Commercial Zone Development Standards for Nonresidential Development
Table 18.320.1
ME
G41 MUnd
R- MUC-a
Standard and C- C-G C-R MUE MLI-R_ 4 M
141
Minimum Setback(ft)
Front None Nono Nene Nene 1-0 Nene Nene
Stroot sido None Nene Nene Nene 1-0 5 Neva
tae 0 or 20 0— 0-er 0-sr 0-cif 0-or 0 or 20 [3]
{2} 29-124 20--E3] 2-0434 20--[3] 2-0434
Rear 0 0 0-e+ 0 0 0-er dor 20 [3]
29–[2} 20--[P} 20 [3] 20--[3} 2043] 20434
Maximum Setback(ft)
Front Nene
20 er�-0 Nene Nene 20 20 20
141
Street side Nene
20 r 0 Nene Nene 20 20 20
Minimum Height
Nana Nana Neva NaRe Nva 2 storioo
ctorioe
Maximum Hoight 45 200
4#i
Maximum Lot 85% 85% 85% 80W. 80% 80% 85%
Covorag o
Minimum 1— 15% 15% 20% 2-044 20% 15%
Landscape Area
Minimum FAR[5} Neva Nene Nene Nene 04 04 1.25
Maximum FAR[5] Nene Nene Nene 0.1 [6} Nene Nave Nene
Note: No Commercial (COM) zoning is proposed as part of the WSRC amendments.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
15
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 16
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Proposed Development Capacity
Table 4 and Table 5 summarize the proposed Commercial Zone Site Design Standards for Nonresidential
Development and Apartment Development Standards, respectively. These amendments are documented
in MADE Public Review Draft (tigard-or.gov).
Table 4: Proposed Commercial Zone Site Design Standards for Nonresidential Development
Table 18.320.1
Commercial Zone Site Desi.n Standards for Nonresidential Develo.ment
Standard COM MUC MUE MUR
Minimum Setback(ft)
-Front or street-facing 1 1 1 1
-Side or rear adjacent
to nonresidential or 0 0 0 0
RES-E zone
-Side or rear adjacent
to a RES-A—RES-D 15 15 15 15
zone
Maximum front or 12
street-facing Setback None 20 10
Maximum Lot Coverage 100% 100% 100% 100%
Minimum Landscape 0% 0% 0% 0%
Area — — — —
Table 5: Proposed Apartment Development Standards
Table 18.230.1
Apartment Development Standards
Standard RES-D RES-E MUC MUR
Minimum Setbacks(ft)
-Front or street- 20 20 1 1
facing
-Side or rear 10 10
adjacent to 0 0
nonresidential or – –
RES-E zone
-Side or rear adjacent 10 10111
to a RES-A—RES-D 15 15
zone
Maximum Setbacks(ft)
-Front or street- None None 12 12
111
Minimum Height(ft) None None 12 12
Maximum Height(ft) 35 45 185 60
Maximum Lot 80% 80% None None
Coverage
Minimum Landscape 20% 20% None None
Area
Minimum Density 11 units 23 units per None None
per acre acre
Maximum Density 14 units 30 units per None None
per acre acre
Kittelson&Associates,Inc.
16
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 17
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
SUMMARY OF PRPOSED CHANGES
The focus of changes to WSRC is to encourage job growth, economic viability, and environmental
sustainability through updates to the City of Tigard Development Code, which sets the regulations for
where and how things can be built. The zoning and development code changes aim to promote job
growth, economic equity, and environmental sustainability by:
■ Expanding and modernizing allowed uses:
- Allowing for more area-wide mixed-use development could encourage greater job density and
better accommodate alternative forms of transportation, like biking and public transit.
■ The proposed change's emphasis on better accommodating mixed-use development and alternative
forms of transportation, additional motor vehicle traffic is not expected.
■ The maximum building heights and limits on square footage of indoor retail sales result in
equivalent or reduced levels of development potential with the proposed changes as compared to
the existing zoning and development code.
Use Standards
The following use standards apply to development in the plan district, whether within a subdistrict or
outside of a subdistrict.
In the MUC zone:
■ Residential and nonresidential uses are allowed as single-use or mixed-use developments.
■ Indoor sales and services are limited to 30,000 square feet per tenant except where in an existing
building.
■ Motor vehicle sales is an allowed use if all storage and activity is in a building.The existing exception
for the development located at the northwest corner of Highway 217 and Greenburg Road will
remain in place, as will allowances for accessory motor vehicle servicing.
■ Many other commercial and civic uses are allowed or allowed conditionally.
■ Apartments are allowed housing types anywhere zoned MUC, and rowhouses are allowed only
within the Design Review Subdistrict.
In the MUE zone:
■ Residential uses are allowed only as part of mixed-use buildings where at least 30 percent gross
floor area is devoted to a nonresidential use.
■ Indoor sales and services are allowed up to 30,000 square feet per tenant.
■ Motor vehicle sales are allowed up to 25,000 square feet per tenant if all storage, including vehicle
inventory, is in a building.
■ Motor vehicle servicing is allowed if all activity and storage is contained in a building.
■ Off-site services are allowed up to 20,000 square feet per tenant and fleet vehicles are subject to
parking maximums as provided in Chapter 18.410.
■ Wholesale and equipment rental is allowed up to 20,000 square feet per tenant.
■ Drive-throughs are prohibited. • Gas stations are allowed.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
17
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 18
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
In the MUR zone:
■ Indoor sales and services and office are allowed in mixed-use buildings.
■ Other nonresidential uses are not allowed.
■ All housing types except mobile home parks are allowed.
Proposed Development Standards
There are no Floor Area Ratio (FAR), maximum lot coverage, or minimum landscaping requirements in the
plan district. Development is subject to maximum setbacks, minimum window coverage, and other
pedestrian-friendly standards, all of which are designed to be as clear and objective as possible.
Maximum building height is the primary method of regulating density, with different maximums provided
for different zones, subdistricts, or development types. Some zones or subdistricts offer height incentives
for mixed-use buildings. The proposed maximum heights are largely similar or reduced compared to the
existing standards.
Proposed Subdistricts
As described previously, the proposed subdistricts set additional standards and guidance for the type of
land use and development within these designated subdistricts.
■ Design Review Subdistrict:
- Development in the Design Review Subdistrict is subject only to the use standards and height
standards provided in this chapter. Development in this subdistrict is evaluated using the
discretionary criteria provided in the new Chapter 18.725, Development Design Reviews, in the
place of other standards.
■ Apartment Subdistrict:
- Development in the Apartment Subdistrict is subject to the use and development standards of the
MUR base zone,with the exceptions of housing types and building height.The only housing type
allowed in the apartment subdistrict is apartments and development is required to be at least
three stories tall.
■ Metzger Business Subdistrict:
- Development in the Metzger Business Subdistrict is subject to the use and development
standards of the MUC base zone, except for building height and residential uses. Development in
this subdistrict is intended to be smaller in scale than development in the MUC zone outside the
subdistrict and residential is only allowed as part of a mixed-use building.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
18
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 19
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Table 6: Proposed Zone Change Comparison (Non Residential)
Zoning Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Net Difference
(Total Acres) (Total Acres) (Total Acres)
Professional Commercial (C-P) 0.82 0 -0.82
Mixed-Use Commercial (MUC) 239.12 230.81 -8.31
Mixed-Use Employment 1 (MUE-1) 88.22 0 -88.22
Mixed-Use Employment 2(MUE-2) 0.02 0 -0.02
Mixed Use Employment(MUE) 0 87.25 87.25
Mixed-Use Residential 1 (MUR-1) 48.88 0 -48.88
Mixed-Use Residential 2 (MUR-2) 15.97 0 -15.97
Mixed Use Residential (MUR) 0 184.02 184.02
Total 468.32 574.08 105.76
As shown in Table 6, C-P is removed as part of the proposed zone changes.
MUC includes a marginal reduction of approximately 8.3 acres. MUE-1 and MUE-2 are combined into a
single MUE zone. As a result, a total of approximately 0.97 acres of MUE is reduced.
MUR-1 and MUR-2 are also combined into a single MUR zone. As a result, a total of approximately 119.17
acres of MUR is increased.
I
Kittelson&Associates,Inc.
19
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 20
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ZONES ASSUMPTIONS
Metro maintains the travel demand model that includes the growth allocations for housing and
employment in the region. The estimates are based on the coordinated population forecast, economic
forecasts, land use plans, assumptions, and desires about how areas will develop or redevelop. Model
development and refinement is completed in coordination with local jurisdictions.
The proposed zone and text amendments are primarily covered by six (6) different transportation analysis
zones (TAZ) in the model. Figure 6 illustrates the TAZs within WSRC where proposed changes are
identified and the difference of population and employment growth for each TAZ.
Table 7 identifies the TAZs in the WSRC where changes are proposed and summarizes the difference in
number of households and employment between 2015 and 2040.
Table 7:Transportation Analysis Zones-Washington Square Regional Center
TAZ 2015 2040 Household 2015 2040 Employment
Households Households Increase Employment Employment Increase
1007 185 710 525 6,214 8,474 2260
1008 150 337 187 3,620 4,889 1269
1019 0 1,076 I 1076 1,939 3,502 1563
1032 2,342 3,019 677 676 1321 645
1033 672 1,611 I 939 73 92
1034 1,133 1,206 I 73 99 203
1140 3,064 3,949 885 645 1,222 577
Total 7,546 11,908 4,362 13,266 19,703 6,437
As shown in Table 7, growth of approximately 4,362 households and 6,437 jobs is projected in the existing
Metro Travel Demand Model for areas of proposed zone and text amendment changes in the WSRC.The
proposed zoning and text amendments are intended to help facilitate development and redevelopment in
the Project area so that WSRC may accommodate the future growth allocated to this area.The proposed
amendments area not anticipated to greatly increase the development potential of the WSRC or change
the projected growth for the 20-year horizon.
Kittelson&Associates,Inc.
20
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
SW Blakeney St 47'5
Ciull' ndySt.b° 1 I SW Garden Home Rd
e Dr Y
�e�t m 1 SW Marjorie Ln /�_—__I ' a (>) > >
S�(tt CC5FOr III I 3 c a
S��\dge GQ�aral Ter I / +� 8 o
1 I SW Whitfo 1 co c'
s� , \`a I 1 /SWEagte Ln a_S5f LS a Mlle Tei
SW Bel P I I / I� SW Dolph St
,-1 +
SW crystal St/ I Q
v 1 S W Cre stwooq,0r /
co
I I / 1 Gt °.a
L 1 I nestwoo6 '`./ I -74 SW Aiden St
' I Bch/ 13
t �S 1� �/ 1 �is
�v I C �' u
stratsSt ..SA `•Cj —+
Qt ♦% tib'/ I
:. t 3 s I
• N % I R6. p
I
-- I ,� •• 1 0\e
sar co
°0 I S ••` 1 0S'C:\\
1 I �of
1 1 1 5
/ 7 SW Taylors Ferry Rd
/ p
• N rr. _ y ,coo•
> a r a
s� I a SW Blum Rd1`—'1
1 0 1 TAZ: 11,40 SW Cedarcrest St
1 Pop Growth:885
m N, s� o >` (Emp(Growth: 577
is `� c' _ , TAZ: 1007 n- ..\,1\\::'
� • 1
m 0 ‘• c',,
• \ / Pop Growth:525 N �� �� 1—
o , p "DY
I Emp Growth: 2260 , \' �� SW Elmwood St
11 Iellill 11 SW \1`s,
0- -L• r.*_ I IImIliO \ c1 CoI � .1a w1nr��ctc• o Ile
O dLo �.. �lir ` TAZ: 1008
foo oa a Pop Growth: 187 ���
L
O SW�tao i Emp Growth: 1269 a \'
o TAZ: 1019 S�
odv Pop Growth:4IM
g▪ oo Emp Growti•568 �� ��A
�aN S `� N \,.' \ TAZ: 1033 SW pine St
\� \ Pop Growth:939TAZ: 1034
\\ .\\\\����
SW Cotta `� ady j� Emp Growth: 19p Growth: 73
i o� 7 Q ����� p=Growth�104�
'.§.'
>. ul P Iii �,..��\ 1
Q87
��+�F1 °� \ 1 SW Steve St
o \ 1 C
o SW North Dakota St N. TAZ 1032 1 Q
4' Pop Growth: 677 1
1
oy Emp Growth:645 I s�
aof' SW['tattle St"'
SW Tigard St <-t
_r—
Residential = —I Washington Square Analysis Center o 0.2.5 Miles 0
J
• Mixed-Use Commercial
IP TAZs
N Mixed-Use Employment
liTIP Tigard City Limits
X Mixed-Use Residential Figure 6
Parks-Recreation
KKITTELSON Proposed Zoning and TAZs
&ASSOCIATES Tigard, Oregon
21
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 22
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
SUMMARY OF ADDITIONAL MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC
As described earlier, the proposed zoning and text amendments are intended to help facilitate
development and redevelopment in the Project area so that WSRC may accommodate the future growth
allocated to this area. The proposed amendments area not anticipated to greatly increase the
development potential of the WSRC or change the projected growth for the 20-year horizon.
Mixed-Use Employment (MUE) zoning is consolidated and relocated along SW Cascade Avenue. Mixed-
Use Commercial (MUC) is moved from SW Cascade Avenue to the Washington Square mall area.A
increase of Mixed-Use Residential (MUR) is proposed along SW Hall Boulevard and its surrounding area.
The zone and text amendments described in this memorandum are not intended to create greater
intensity of the existing WSRC. Instead, these changes are proposed to more closely align with the
intentions of the designated CFA, enabling the already forecasted growth shown in the Metro Travel
Demand model to be achieved and removing barriers to allow the market to be more flexible in achieving
what it wants to provide.
In conclusion, the proposed zone and text amendments are not anticipated to increase traffic volumes or
vehicle trips on the local and state system anymore than what is already forecasted in the Metro Travel
Demand Model.The proposed zone and text amendments are likely to result in less single occupancy
vehicle trips (SOV) in the CFA.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
22
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 23
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Reported Crashes
A summary of the five most recent years of reported fatal and serious injury (Injury A) crashes within the
WSRC is summarized below.
A total of 642 crashes were reported within the WSRC between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021.
Only crashes that were reported to the police are included below; crashes that resulted in minimal to no
vehicular damage with no injury or possible injury may not be reported. The 642 reported crashes are
summarized by injury severity below.
• 1 fatal crash
• 11 serious injury crashes
• 252 minor injury crashes
• 96 moderate injury crashes
• 282 non-injury crashes
Of the 642 reported crashes, 237 crashes were reported along Hall Boulevard and SW Scholls Ferry Road
(south of SW Hall Boulevard ) and 209 were reported on OR 217. There were a total of 446 crashes on SW
Hall Boulevard and OR 217 alone, representing 70 percent of all crashes within the WSRC boundary from
2017 to 2021.
FATAL AND SEVERE INJURY A CRASHES
Fatal Crashes
One fatal crash was reported in the WSRC during the most recent five-year analysis period.The fatal crash
was reported on July 14th 2021 at 4:00 PM under clear and dry conditions.The crash was reported at the
intersection of SW Hall Boulevard and SW Oleson Road.A motorist traveling northbound on SW Hall
Boulevard made an improper turn onto SW Oleson Road where the vehicle departed from the road, on to
the curb and struck a traffic pole.
Serious Injury Crashes
Eleven (11) reported serious injury crashes were reported within the WSRC are summarized in Table 8. Of
the 11 severe injury crashes, seven (7) occurred on an ODOT facility. None of the 11 crashes involved
pedestrians or bicyclists.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
23
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 24
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Table 8: Reported Severe Injury Crashes in WSRC (Jan. 1, 2017, to Dec. 31, 2021)
Date Location Crash Type Cause
1/30/2017 OR 217 Southbound terminal Turning movement Disregarded traffic signal
and SW Greenburg Road
8/25/2017 OR 210 bridge over OR217 Rear-End Failed to avoid vehicle ahead
10/14/2017 SW Cascade and SW Scholls Rear-End Failed to avoid vehicle ahead
Ferry Road
SW Cascade Avenue at curve Overturned- non- Speed too fast for conditions (Not
12/2/2018 east of SW Scholls Ferry Road collision exceeding limit),drove left of center on
two-way road;straddling the center line
2/16/2019 OR 217 north bound terminal Fixed-object Reckless Driving (Per PAR or self-reported)
at SW Greenburg Road collision-sign
10/24/2019 SW Cascade Avenue at Tesla Rear-End Failed to avoid vehicle ahead
Driveway
SW Hall Boulevard and SW Turning Movement Disregarded traffic signal
12/16/2019 Washington Square Regional
Center
10/12/2020 SW Hall Boulevard near Hall Side Swipe Physical Illness, drove left of center on two-
Boulevard Learning Tree way road;straddling the center line
4/17/2021 SW Cascade and SW Scholls Rear-End,Overturn Failed to avoid vehicle ahead
Ferry Road
6/15/2021 SW Greenburg Road at 76 gas Turning movement Did not yield right-of-way
station
7/3/2021 OR 217 near mile point 4.45 Overturned- non- Did not yield right-of-way, Improper change
collision of traffic lanes, Other(Not improper driving)
ODOT SAFETY PRIORITY INDEX SYSTEM
The Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) is a method originally developed in 1986 by the Oregon
Department of Transportation (ODOT) for identifying potential safety problems on state highways.The
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) accepted SPIS as fulfilling the requirements of the Highway
Safety Improvement Program (HSIP).
ODOT's TransGlS website provides SPIS data from 2016 to 2020. Based on a review, the following
locations within the Project study area are identified as SPIS sites:
• OR210/0R141
• OR210 from Cascade Avenue to bridge over OR 217
• OR 141 between SW Palmblad Road and SW Greenburg Road
• OR141 North of SW Pfaffle Street
Kittelson&Associates,Inc.
24
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 8,2024 Page 25
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Appendix A
City of Tigard Transportation System Plan 2022
Tigard on the Move,the city's Transportation System Plan (TSP) was completed in January 2022 and creates
a list of transportation projects and programs for the city to implement with available funding over the next
20 years. Projects are grouped into six categories:stronger streets network, urban upgrades and active
transportation, connectivity,transit,transportation systems management and operations (TSMO), and
special study areas.
TSP Chapter 6. Recommended Investments contains the list of projects.
City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan 2019
The Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP), completed in September 2019, examined historic crash
data across the city to identify future roadway investments to address safety concerns. Of the six locations
with site-specific treatments,the segment of Highway 99W from SW Main Street/SW Greenburg Road to SW
Hall Boulevard falls within the Project study area.
The TSAP recognizes that there are limited opportunities for safety-focused improvements along this
segment because Highway 99W is a seven-lane facility and the Highway 99W/SW Hall Boulevard and
Highway 99W/SW Main Street/SW Greenburg Road intersections each have more than 40,000 vehicles that
enter each day. However,the TSAP identifies two opportunities for safety-focused improvements-an
access management evaluation along Highway 99W in this corridor, and an improvement pedestrian
crossing at the SW Greenburg Road/SW Center Street intersection, including curb extensions and a median
refuge island.
TriMet Pedestrian Plan, 2020
TriMet's Pedestrian Plan focuses on three primary objectives: Removing barriers to riding transit,improving
partnership between cities, counties, and the State,as well as equipping partnering agencies with an
access-to-transit lens to help inform their decision-making and support future funding request.
TriMet's Pedestrian Plan identifies needs in and around WSRC including previously identified projects
(sidewalk infill, new roadways and new trails identified in existing plans) and identified gaps (sidewalk gaps
identified through the TriMet Pedestrian Plan).These projects are identified in Appendix E,Appendix F, and
Appendix G.
Washington County Transportation System Plan 2019
The Washington County Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update provides direct guidance on how to build,
operate, and maintain Washington County's major roadway network,while addressing complementary
elements of the larger transportation system-including transit, multi-use trails,state highways and freight
railroads-maintained by other entities.
No projects are identified within the Project study area based on a review of the Washington Count TSP
Update.
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
25
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 11,2024 Page 26
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 2021-2024
OR 217 Auxiliary Lanes Project I Project #: 18841
Construction for the OR 217 Auxiliary Lanes Project began in December 2021 and continues through 2025.
On OR217, add a southbound auxiliary lane from ORl O to OR99W and a northbound auxiliary lane from
OR99W to SW Scholl's Ferry Rd (OR210) to improve safety and traffic reliability. Pave road,add protective
screening, and bridge updates on Allen Boulevard and Denny Rd structures. Pave road, replace joints,and
repair deteriorating concrete columns on OR210 over OR217 structure.Add sidewalks and bike lanes to the
SW Hall Boulevard (OR141) over OR217 overcrossing to improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity.Add
bridge rail that meets the current standards to the Fanno Creek Bridge. Install signs and technology to
capture traffic statistics and improve operations.Add a signal pole base and conduit to the design of the
SW Hall Boulevard Bridge replacement.
OR 141 (SW Hall Boulevard): SW Spruce St -SW Hemlock St I Project #: 22647
Signalized pedestrian crossings on SW Hall Boulevard currently have significant distance between them.
Project will provide 2 enhanced pedestrian crossings to increase the number of signals along SW Hall
improving the visibility of pedestrians crossing the street and encouraging people to use these crossings to
walk to parks and schools in the immediate area.
OR 210: SW Scholls Ferry Rd -SW Hall Boulevard ITS I Project #: 21 121
Implement Adaptive Signal Control Technologies (ASCT) to adjust traffic signal to actual conditions.ASCT
continuously distributes green light time equitably to all traffic movements and therefore helps to reduce
congestion.
Metro Regional Transportation Plan 2023
As the metropolitan planning organization for the Portland metropolitan area, Metro is authorized by
Congress and the State of Oregon to coordinate and plan investments in the transportation system for
Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington counties.This is done through periodic updates to the Regional
Transportation Plan-now every 5 years.The projects listed below are located within the Project study area.
Safety&Operations Projects I RTP# 12095
Description Projects to improve safety and/or operational efficiencies such as pedestrian crossings,speed feedback
signs,transit priority technology at signals on arterial roads,railroad crossing repairs,slide and rock
fall protections,illumination,signals and signal operations systems,sidewalks,bicycle lanes,and other
improvements that do not add motor vehicle capacity.
To Multiple locations
From Various
Agency ODOT
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
26
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 11,2024 Page 27
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Primary Increase safety
Purpose
RTP Category Roads and Bridges
Estimated 349,000,000
Cost(2023$)
Time Period 2023-2030
Washington Square Connectivity Improvements I RTP#10746
Description Increase local street connections at Washington Square Center based on recommendations in
regional center plan.
To Multiple locations
From Various
Agency Tigard
Primary Purpose Increase travel options/alt.to driving
alone
RTP Category Roads and Bridges
Estimated Cost(2023 349,000,000
$)
Time Period 2031-2045
Greenburg Road I RTP# 10612
Description Upgrades roadway to up to 5-lane urban standard with 3400 feet of bike lanes and sidewalks
in regional center.
To OR 217
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
27
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 11,2024 Page 28
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
From Hall Boulevard.
Agency Washington County
Primary Purpose Increase safety
RTP Category Roads and Bridges
Estimated Cost(2023 32,500,000
$)
Time Period 2031-2045
Washington Square Regional Center Greenbelt Shared Use Path I RTP# 10763
Description Complete WSRC shared-use path.
To OR 217
From Hall Boulevard.
Agency Tigard
Primary Purpose Increase travel options/alt.to driving
alone
RTP Category Walking and Biking
Estimated Cost(2023$) 4,400,000
Time Period 2031-2045
Tigard Neighborhood Greenway Bicycle Improvements I RTP# 11221
Description Make spot improvements on key low-volume,low speed through-routes to facilitate bike&
pedestrian travel;identify them as bike/pedestrian neighborhood greenway routes.
To City-wide
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
28
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 11,2024 Page 29
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
From City-wide
Agency Tigard
Primary Purpose Increase travel options/alt.to driving
alone
RTP Category Walking and Biking
Estimated Cost 9,800,000
(2023$)
Time Period 2031-2045
Locust Avenue Bike Lanes and Sidewalks I RTP# 10611
Description Completes 1650 feet of bike lanes and missing sidewalks in regional
center.
To 72nd Ave.
From Hall Boulevard.
Agency Tigard
Primary Purpose Increase travel options/alt.to driving
alone
RTP Category Walking and Biking
Estimated Cost(2023$) 8,100,000
Time Period 2031-2045
Scholls Ferry Rd. Improvements I RTP# 10596
Description Widen to seven lanes with bike lanes and
sidewalks
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
29
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 11,2024 Page 30
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
To 121st Ave.
From Hwy.217
Agency Washington County
Primary Purpose Increase travel options/alt.to driving
alone
RTP Category Roads and Bridges
Estimated Cost(2023$) 47,800,000
Time Period 2031-2045
OR 217 Ped-Bike Crossing at SW 95th Avenue I RIP# 12168
Description Construct a new Highway 217 overcrossing for active transportation users connecting Metzger
Neighborhood and WSRC area with the Greenburg Neighborhood,Tigard Heritage Trail,Fanno
Creek Trail,and Downtown Tigard.
To Shady Lane
From Oak Street
Agency Tigard
Primary Increase travel options/alt.to driving
Purpose alone
RTP Category Walking and Biking
Estimated Cost 24,400,000
(2023$)
Time Period 2031-2045
Hall Boulevard. Improvements - Locust to Durham I RTP# 11220
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
30
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 11,2024 Page 31
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Description Build protected bike facilities,complete sidewalks on both sides of the road,and provide new and
improved pedestrian crossings throughout the corridor.Maximum roadway cross section of 3 lanes
away from intersections.Combine and coordinate with ODOT State of Good Repair project and potential
Washington County project north of SW Locust.
To Durham
From Locust
Agency ODOT
Primary Increase travel options/alt.to driving alone
Purpose
RTP Category Roads and Bridges
Estimated 32,500,000
Cost(2023$)
Time Period 2031-2045
Hall Boulevard. Improvements I RTP# 11739
Description Improve to 2/3-lane cross section with bike lanes and
sidewalks.
To Locust
From Oleson Rd.
Agency ODOT
Primary Purpose Increase travel options/alt.to driving alone
RTP Category Roads and Bridges
Estimated Cost(2023$) 33,500,000
Time Period 2031-2045
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
31
Attachment 2 WSRC Transportation Analysis
March 11,2024 Page 32
Washington Square Regional Center Development Capacity of Climate Friendly Area
Hall Boulevard. Improvements I RTP# 10595
Description Improve to 2/3-lane cross section with bike lanes and
sidewalks.
To Oleson Rd.
From Scholls Ferry Rd.
Agency ODOT
Primary Purpose Increase travel options/alt.to driving alone
RTP Category Roads and Bridges
Estimated Cost(2023$) 5,900,000
Time Period 2031-2045
Kittelson&Associates, Inc.
32