Loading...
City Council Packet - 02/27/2024 1114 • City of Iig:xrcl Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD r TIGARD CITY COUNCIL&LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND FEBRUARY 27,2024-4:00 p.m. Executive Session; 6:30 p.m.Business Meeting TIME: MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid- City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 - See PUBLIC NOTICE below PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with Oregon House Bill 2560,this will be a hybrid meeting where some Council, staff or public will participate in person and some will participate remotely. How to comment: •Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments by noon the day before the meeting date. •If attending the meeting in person,please fill out the public comment sign-in sheet at the front of the room and come to the microphone when your name is called. •If you prefer to call in,please call 503-966-4101 when instructed to be placed in the queue.We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to two minutes. •You may comment by video through the Teams app.Go to this link to learn how to participate by video: February 27,2024 Council Meeting (https://www.tigard-or.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/5249/372). Upon request,the City will endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (T'DD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM ONLINE:https://www.tigard-or.gov/boxcast CABLE VIEWERS:The City Council meeting will be shown live on Channel 21 (1st Tuesdays) and Channel 28 (2nd& 4th Tuesdays) at 6:30 p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Saturday 7:30 p.m. Sunday 11:30 a.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. " City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: FEBRUARY 27,2024-4:00 p.m. Executive Session;6:30 p.m.Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid-City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 4:00 PM 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss the performance review of public officers or employees under ORS 192.660(2) (i).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 6:30 PM 2. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 3. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITION 4. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment B. Public Comment—Written C. Public Comment—In Person D. Public Comment—Phone-In E. Public Comment—Video 5. CITY MANAGER REPORT 6:45 p.m. estimated time 6. CONSENT AGENDA: (Local Contract Review Board) The Consent Agenda is used for routine items including approval of meeting minutes,contracts or intergovernmental agreements. Information on each item is available on the city's website in the packet for this meeting.These items may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Council members may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. 6:50 p.m. estimated time A. SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL(SS4A)ACTION PLAN CONTRACT B. 72ND AVENUE PRE-DESIGN CONTRACT • Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 7. WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT VISION PROJECT BRIEFING 6:55 p.m. estimated time 8. PUBLIC FACILITY PROPERTY ACQUISITION 7:20 p.m. estimated time 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 11. ADJOURNMENT 7:30 p.m. estimated time 11111 r TIGARD Written Public Comment for the February 27, 2024 Tigard City Council meeting Safe Lots (30) 26.Judy Bueermann 1. Chris Dunn 27.Janine Fender 2. Suzan Campbell (2)* 3. James Wilkinson 4. Joann Tima 5. Jana Gould 6. Judy Bueermann 7. Rossana Sutherland 8. Stephanie Vang (3)* 9. Jackie Lane Sipoloa 10.Paul & Susan Menig 11.Holly Myers 12.Jeanette Leece 13.Alexi Reeve 14.Grace Kelso 15.Bull Mtn Planning Committee 16.Lindsey Voorhees 17.Tyler Birdsey 18.Margaret Hamilton 19.Jack Voorhees 20.Anna Murphy 21.Servin Hamilton 22.Patricia Fuhr 23.Darrick Purfield 24.Susan Purfield 25.Kathleen Whitman Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 12:01 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3003781 IP Address: 50.126.66.188 Submission Date: 02/14/2024 12:00 Survey Time: 1 minute,33 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Chris Dunn Email Complete Address 15295 SW Bull Mountain RD Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Proposed Homeless Parking at Christ the King Church Comments See attached Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Christ the King Homeless Car 2-14-2024.doc Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 February 14, 2024 Dear City Council Elected Officials, I was unable to attend last night's Council meeting and did watch the video from last night. I appreciate the City Manager reiterating that no decision have been made regarding the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. I also appreciate that other alternatives will also be considered. No doubt you may feel we are just repeating the concerns we have already voiced but this is a serious issue for us all. This letter has copies from my previous letters since we still have the same concerns. Thank you for taking the time to review my letter and concerns. This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location. By attending this meeting on February 8th, I saw first hand that the parking lot and gated parking lot on the Police Department and City Hall had several spaces for cars. It was brought up that this would be an ideal spot to try this program out in Tigard since the Police Department is there to assist in security. If this program is to be successful it seems this idea has more merit than putting it in a residential community. We do not dispute the merits of this program, but absolutely implore the city to restrict funding and consider criteria for locations near schools and homes. These programs have a life of their own and the initial programs seem to fade and unintended consequences happen. Those include the issues facing Beaverton with the homeless shelter by a school. I don't know all the details and yet the parents have voiced their concerns over dropping their children off at the school with a naked person there. They have also shared that they have found drug paraphernalia close to the school. We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity, such as the incidents are taking place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton . We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs. These programs have the best intentions and then as time goes on the security and monitoring of these programs diminishes or is non existent. To my knowledge there is nothing to prevent this initial program from growing into a homeless encampment. We ask the city for the following: • Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. • Explore using public property farther away from homes and schools to host Safe Parking projects in Tigard • Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location criteria to limit these projects to locate within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools) and homes • All funding decisions for this project should be put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents • Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been approved by the city- post this information publicly for all to access. I'm still not sure how the neighborhood found out about this proposal since it wasn't a public forum. Thank you for your time and serious consideration of our concerns. Chris Dunn Bull Mountain Resident Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 8:02 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3004798 IP Address: 73.25.238.210 Submission Date: 02/14/2024 8:02 Survey Time: 1 minute,31 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Suzan Campbell Email Complete Address Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Item D Overnight homeless parking Christ the King church Comments I was born and raised Lutheran. Baptized,confirmed,and married Lutheran. I am not wealthy nor am I connected to any well funded political group. I am concerned about and do oppose the projected overnight homeless camping idea.Your site is near homes, preschools,day care,school bus stops and also a marajuana store.Of course I understand not all homeless people do drugs and people need help which I support.This location has been publicized however and the probability of drawing many others besides the three cars is very high. I came from Portland and saw firsthand what happened and how difficult it was to remove trespassers for months and years.And your sanitary facilities will draw people.And there is no plan to have 24 hour security.Just Compassion has shown itself unresponsive in Beaverton.Why not do fund raising and use the money to actually change peoples lives instead of just giving them a place to park? Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 10:45 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028548 IP Address: 107.77.205.111 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 10:44 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 23 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Suzan Campbell Email Complete Address Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) D Overnight parking Christ the King Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said,we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city:Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools)and home.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for Safe Parking projects are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2024 7:40 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3007794 IP Address: 50.54.155.166 Submission Date: 02/16/2024 7:40 Survey Time: 1 minute, 13 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name James Wilkinson Email Complete Address 15380 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Park Program Comments I am attaching a comment for the next City Council meeting. I am an interested Bull Mountain resident. I was contacted by the Bull Mountain Connect Planning Committee and asked it I could do a quick parking utilization count as oulined in my submission. I wish there was a way to work with the city and make everyone happy and the needs of the unhoused met.Thanks in advance for your consideration.-Jim Wilkinson Attachment Supporting Documents/Images TCH Parking Data Testimony.pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 February 15, 2024 Dear City Council Members, My name is Jim Wilkinson. I have only recently become a resident of Bull Mountain, near 150t1. I am a retired international Architect and Master Planner. I worked with the Bull Mountain Connect neighborhood planning team to conduct a parking space count and utilization survey for four parking lots at the Tigard City Hall property. It was suggested to not do a count on the day after the Superbowl (Monday 2/11), but I did one just to practice - at 10: 15 am. The next day, Tuesday, February 12, 2024, I did three utilization counts. These were done at 9:30am, 4:35pm and 7:45pm. After conducting the counts, I compiled the data onto an 8.5x11 inch graphic to make it easy to print out (see page 2). The four city parking lots I gathered data on are highlighted in red with yellow tone on the attached site plan, and also numbered. The site plan is compiled from the Google Earth Pro website. The parking counts are arranged by lot and time in a matrix below the site plan. We hope you will consider the time I took as an informed neighbor to gather this current data, and use it to plan for Safe Parking projects to be hosted on public property farther away from homes and schools. I look forward to continued engagement and discussion as this project is considered, with the goal to ensure it is executed safely for all neighbors near the proposed Christ the King Lutheran Church parking lot site. . . '.."/\4.0c:ik. '.., . ., . / eV' -t - ' ''".^ - ...%, . / , •' ,.• ' . ••-• 6/ N.• „ •",- -,, e ad Map k .• .. fr / / 4 '1,1LN • , : ,rf li l• l . IL l • 1`,tik„, r S„'.,, '.\• • -' .011....)...* . ;'. ,,:- 1 • pi ., . . • - . . : -,-7., - 1.. A , — , ../' L .• • ••• •..'" • c .:1., 1 r , . .. -... ... ,..,., r .:... . •a t a . :' 'Z' • :e .." a, • . fa ' ' ' IF , . • •. ..1.r 0 3.. •e, .• ,,, ..t4 .'•,:, N.,4 t pip ;- ee • .41t, ,• . - • '0114r, ' fm• ..* \ ,, •'•Aip ' II. ' . R • 1 . , . .,; ' • , rth , • i. 1 ,, ;'. ,,.. 1;" , • 6'6 Is i il.._ • ' ' Ili '''' '' 11‘ . 1 .:FR . PI, . e .... .., ,,,,.a, , • • .,.i ,....- .8 , %multi.11, ir. -- -------A--, 1...i.i.....z:.k.; .. ..„ ‘„ , .e. 0 . . 1---------'-- r—lit' - .214 • . • / Iri.e ,!," r• 14 ;•"•''..',4's" t'r . . 1;,, .1' , 1- -••. 4-::,f,• .i.'Pr:. ... ' 21' - . , f 1 . ..:e. v.,.. ....., :, , ,. : •Av,.. ... N... • .1!.4 - `4.:•'.,.,- , . . -4f.- . . ......... ' Monday 2/12 Tuesday 2/13 Tuesday 2/13 Tuesday 2113 • 10:15 am 9:30am 4:35 pm 7:45 pm • • 1 . 61)41 spaces. ' 24 26 10 3 , . 2c;24—o2tO • ' \\- 7, 1 8 12 7 3 1, . -i--( , '• _ '111—'1: v.,.,... 1,1?.._,—...,. • 3) ..1-.. ..", • '-• .....r.: 20 spaces ___ .;„,-. ._. . — 39 42 35 7 44sp• es ------ .. . ,. .. ' : h•.',. H-i'l:1(-51. 18 14 15 43 49 spaces Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2024 3:42 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3009205 IP Address: 98.246.40.230 Submission Date: 02/16/2024 3:41 Survey Time: 6 minutes, 32 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Joann Tima Email Complete Address Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. Comments The Bull Mountain location of the Safe Housing Program will have an adverse affect in our neighborhood walks&trips to daycare, schools,churches,corner gas station,grocery stores, restaurants&business.Safety is a great concern here.Just like the many people&business that were forced out of Portland, if cities can't provide security&safety people will not feel protected &they have no choice but to move&they will move out of Tigard, King City&other neighboring areas. It will not be a safe environment for us when you have overnight vehicles camping out in our family neighborhoods.Overnight vehicle activity mostly brings irresponsible behaviors including violence,drugs,toxic waste&trash to great communities. Don't make the mistake that Portland did. I moved here to this neighborhood to get away from this type of decaying environment. It's everyday news you can see&hear the outcrys of the Portland people&the business owners. Portland use to be the place to go, it was a safe beautiful place.Tens of thousands of Oregonians have left the state due to the problems that plague this state. Now we are fearful of our famous transit system for it's full of addicts doing their toxic drugs,excreting their body fluids,exhibiting their dangerous& bazar behaviors. My friends would not go day or night to Portland, nor will they ride the Max. If I can't feel safe in Tigard my next move will be to a state that has safety, rules&enforces them. Don't you want your friends&family to feel safe in their environments?No residential encampments.They need to be at an RV site or in city parking lots where they can be monitored for drug&illegal activities,etc.where they are provided with proper amenities&clean up services. Not next to a 24 hour convience store&gas station, marijuana dispensary,school, & residential community that's trying to live a quiet, peaceful life. Explore using public property farther away from homes and schools Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 2:19 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3011236 IP Address: 73.37.31.152 Submission Date: 02/18/2024 2:19 Survey Time: 9 minutes,41 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jana Gould Email Complete Address 14392 SW 128th Place Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking for Christ the Jung Parking lit Comments The church said they wanted to be a good neighbor,so we are asking that they be a good neighbor by considering the feelings and opinions of residents in the area and the impact this proposed site has had on them and will have on them.There is a major imbalance between those who are favoring this site to those who feel another place away from homes, apartments,schools,and school bus stops would be more appropriate.We are respectfully asking to be heard and to open a conversation on a more suitable location.Thank you! Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 2:40 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3011281 IP Address: 50.38.61.190 Submission Date: 02/18/2024 2:39 Survey Time: 4 minutes, 24 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Judy Bueermann Email Complete Address 11926 Sw Aspen Ridge Dr Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking program being considered at the Christ the King church parking lot on Hwy 99 and Bull Mt. Road. Comments Dear Mayor Lueb and Councilors,With a heavy heart I appreciate the opportunity to address the "Safe Parking" program being considered at the Christ the King church parking lot on Hwy 99 and Bull Mt. Road. I understand the need for safe parking as I have had family members who tried living in their cars in order to escape the high cost of apartments. My husband and I shared our home with three different families/individuals hoping to help make a difference for them and enable them to get back on their feet.Two of the three families chose to get healthy and are doing well. One was a nightmare. It is difficult to understand the motives of some people.Some do not care about boundaries and will attempt to take whatever they want. I have serious concerns about the location and safety of this project. Please consider using the parking lot at Tigard's City Hall. I am sighting safety for the client and the community.Vernon and Dorothy's place for the safe parking was revealed in a most unfortunate way;therefore endangering not only the surrounding area, but also their own clients. I don't know who put up the banner, made the leaflets or called the news, but the hostel exposure made the project unsafe. I hope to encourage Mayor Lueb and ALL involved to be a groundbreaking example and use the resources at the city's disposal,(the parking at City Hall). Maybe build a fence around the cars to be protected while using the seer fact of proximity to the police station as a deterrent for those that were not invited into the program.The questions regarding safety in the event of something going awry has not been addressed. Please reconsider this matter.Thank you,Judy Bueermann Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 5:43 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3011485 IP Address: 104.28.116.95 Submission Date: 02/18/2024 5:43 Survey Time: 11 minutes, 19 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Rossana Sutherland Email Complete Address 13535 SW 115th Ave Tigard,OR 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Dear City Council Members,We am writing to you as a concerned citizen of Tigard,Oregon.We have lived in this city for 10 years and love the quality of life and the services that the city provides. However,we would like to express our opposition to the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host in Tigard.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily,9am-12,through the end of May. In addition,a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot,or even share a fence line with the proposed location.While we do not dispute the merits of this program,we ask the city to restrict funding and consider criteria for locations near schools and homes.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity, such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton near the library recently,where a man set himself on fire and burned to death just outside a nearby school, in full view of many young students.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs. Please explore using public property farther away from homes and schools to host Safe Parking projects.We support the city's efforts to address the homelessness crisis however,we believe that there are more suitable locations for these projects than residential neighborhoods,such as public lands, industrial zones.We urge the city to explore these alternatives and to consult with the residents before approving any projects.All funding decisions for this project should be put to a city council vote- we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents. Comments Dear City Council Members,We am writing to you as a concerned citizen of Tigard,Oregon.We have lived in this city for 10 years and love the quality of life and the services that the city provides. However,we would like to express our opposition to the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host in Tigard.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily,9am-12,through the end of May. In addition,a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot,or even share a fence line with the proposed location.While we do not dispute the merits of this 1 program,we ask the city to restrict funding and consider criteria for locations near schools and homes.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity, such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton near the library recently,where a man set himself on fire and burned to death just outside a nearby school, in full view of many young students.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We ask you to explore using public property farther away from homes and schools to host Safe Parking projects. We support the city's efforts to address the homelessness crisis however,we believe that there are more suitable locations for these projects than residential neighborhoods,such as public lands, industrial zones.We urge the city to explore these alternatives and to consult with the residents before approving any projects.All funding decisions for this project should be put to a city council vote- we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents.We are disappointed that the city appears to have not involved the city council in the decision-making process for this project. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 7:29 PM To: Carol Krager; Jesse Raymundo; Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3011581 IP Address: 50.39.223.102 Submission Date: 02/18/2024 7:28 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 22 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name stephanie Vang Email Complete Address ,Tigard Oregon Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe parking Comments How can we keep Tigard green with this project when we are encouraging people to turn on their car all day and night Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 7:59 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3027272 IP Address: 50.39.223.102 Submission Date: 02/25/2024 7:58 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 29 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name stephanie Vang Email Complete Address 13263 sw NicoleLn ,Tigard Or Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Smart park Comments I witness multiple police activity interviewing 3 teenagers in that area where the Mayor advocates for the smart park zone...can you tell me what happened . Is this really a spot tigard council continues to endorse Attachment Supporting Documents/Images F86C B42 E-AF F B-4AA F-9CE7-D D7A91A788 F F.j peg Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 ft.,'' 4 ts ' PiS SO/ tr WM, el • '.c - i _ . .. • • S., 111 " _ - a-all‘ tiliaLLIPP - _ . •-aetrusimk.- —a 1" n••=,-----tp,..-. • ----"' - -- •_.,I"- i 4 •4- .4.-•-•••.4 . ik .0' ti'a t' .• .4 ---44 ....4 . ....„ . Asale.a . AMR k.. ilk ei .._ ...-. 1‘ 'A(Xitiftfty,/ .., • il II% I - 1.4‘.... -..., ..40 WOE- INNO iSitikL Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 8:15 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3027290 IP Address: 50.39.223.102 Submission Date: 02/25/2024 8:14 Survey Time: 1 minute,28 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name stephanie Vang Email Complete Address 13263 sw Nicole In Tigard,Or 97225 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Smart park Comments What are the qualifications for a case manager for this program?We want to know. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2024 8:37 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3011643 IP Address: 73.37.31.226 Submission Date: 02/18/2024 8:37 Survey Time: 24 minutes, 57 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jackie Lane Sipoloa Email Complete Address 14934 SW Greenfield Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Overnight Parking Proposal Christ the King Church Comments I am deeply,deeply concerned about the proposal to have vehicles parked overnight at Christ the King church.Though we know not all those experiencing houselessness are drug addicts,studies show that 1/3 of the houseless population does in fact have a drug or alcohol addiction and 2/3 have struggled with drugs or alcohol at some point in their lives.We have seen instances of crime and drug use at the Safe Parking site in Beaverton and have every reason to be concerned the same would happen in Tigard.With NO known plans for on-site security, I worry for the neighbors living nearby AS WELL as the safety of those sleeping in their cars.The correlation between houselessness and illicit drugs cannot be ignored.And with the risk of illicit drugs,comes an increased risk of crime.This isn't hyperbole or prejudice.Sadly, it's just reality.There has to be an alternative that provides a more secure spot for people to sleep in their cars.Without subjecting nearby residents to the risk that comes with these programs.Additionally, because the program does bring inherent risk to nearby communities, it should be something that is brought to a vote so that the residents impacted have an opportunity to be included in such an important decision. I have to believe there are alternate locations to host this program. Locations that are not adjacent to a preschool or residential community. I often wonder why Safe parking programs aren't hosted at Police stations?Seems it would be much safer for the people sleeping in their cars and the risk of drug-related crimes would likely decrease. My hope is that this program can be held at a safer location. My hope is that this program is not approved for Christ the King church or at the very least,it is a decision turned over to residents by way of a vote.Thank you for your time Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 9:14 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3012746 IP Address: 104.28.116.44 Submission Date: 02/19/2024 9:13 Survey Time: 1 minute, 17 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Paul &Susan Menig Email Complete Address 11902 SW Aspen Ridge Drive Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program in concert with Just Compassion Comments See attached .pdf Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Safe Parking by Just Compassion.pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 To: Tigard City Councilors From: Paul and Susan Menig. 11902 SW Aspen Ridge Drive, Tigard, OR 97224 Subject: Safe Parking Program by Just Compassion Councilors, We have empathy for those that are forced to live in circumstances that are dangerous, unclean, and unhealthy. We are concerned for the safety of children and others in our neighborhood. We are disturbed by the unclean homeless tents in various parts of the Portland Metro area, the graffiti along our city highways, the beggars at intersections that are dropped off and picked up by vans. The Just Compassion Safe Parking Program currently proposed for location at Christ the King Lutheran Church is not a good solution. We have read the literature, attended the listening sessions, and investigated the program online. We recommend you consider an alternative location and provide additional information on issues and successes with the program in other locations. Here are some bullet points that should be addressed: • The manager of the apartment complex across Bull Mountain from the proposed site already has problems with homeless people living in vehicles in the parking lot that cannot be moved due to establishment of some sort of right of residency. • The manager of the apartment complex indicates that they are unable to get regular patrol by city police. Therefore, it is unlikely that the church parking lot will receive any better attention. • Currently the church runs a school/daycare for young children. At the meeting they were unable to commit to waiting until after the school stops functioning at the end of this school year. • Our state and metro area do not have a definition of drugs that we agree with. Therefore, a statement that drugs are not allowed does not allay our fears that drugs as we define and interpret them will be prohibited. • There is a marijuana dispensary located across the street from the proposed site. • A simple lock on a storage facility, portable restroom, and washing station is insufficient to assure use only by the people in the program. • Inadequate information has been provided to answers regarding the supervision of the site during the evening and during the day. • There are already problems reported with vagrants and others in the parking lot and near the building. • While the church school will close, there are a number of children from the apartment complex that wait for buses in the morning and are dropped off in the afternoon. Their safety is important. • Just Compassion frequently said the locations in Beaverton and elsewhere are "undisclosed." Disclosing this location would appear to add a level of danger to the program that is unnecessary. We recommend further consideration of the program and its results to date and another site be found to trial this program in the city. Sincerely, Paul and Susan Menig /c(, ( Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 11:22 AM To: Carol Krager; Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3013391 IP Address: 98.246.40.230 Submission Date: 02/19/2024 11:22 Survey Time: 34 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Holly Myers Email Complete Address Tigard, OR 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Comments Please bring the Safe Housing Program locations to a city council vote. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 10:17 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3018454 IP Address: 50.45.247.30 Submission Date: 02/21/2024 10:17 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 53 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jeanette Leece Email Complete Address 11992 SW ROYALTY COURT Apt 17 KING CITY,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Proposed Safe Parking Program location at Christ the King Lutheran Church on Bull Mountain Road. Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program location at Christ the King Lutheran Church on Bull Mountain Road.That locations hosts a day care and there is an elementary school very close by.This make this neighborhood location a very bad choice.We do not support this location for homeless and feel there are many other locations away from preschools,schools and neighborhoods in this area.The safety and security of the area families and children must be the primary consideration.While we applaud the attempts to help the less fortune in our area,enabling them to continue to choose unhealthy life styles and unhealthy coping by living in cars for mobility is not a good fit for our community.The senior community of King City Civic Association of hard working and retired elders is right across Bull Mountain Road and in the last five years of living here,we have had several problems with homeless encampments,crime and vandalism that stem from the homeless population and easy access to Hwy 99.We are working with the local police to deter these crimes but inviting unsavory folks near here just seems the wrong choice. Please reject this location.Jeanette Leece Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 11:47 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3021477 IP Address: 73.37.31.48 Submission Date: 02/22/2024 11:47 Survey Time: 9 minutes,44 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Alexi Reeve Email Complete Address Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Tigard safe parking program Comments I recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. I am worried about the safety of our neighbors if this program will not be providing security at this proposed location,which is in close proximity to schools and homes.An increase in 911 calls at other Safe Parking locations shows that there is an uptick in illegal activity at these sites.There was an increased number of calls related to fentanyl abuse at the Safe Parking Beaverton location. I do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said, i implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods. I implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city: Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools(including daycares and preschools)and homes.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents. Ensure the permitting process for Safe Parking projects are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for-please post this information publicly. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard 1 This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:04 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028629 IP Address: 173.164.123.133 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 11:04 Survey Time: 3 minutes, 29 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Grace Kelso Email Complete Address 14430 SW 128th PI Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Park Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments Please see attached letter. Please reconsider funding the Safe Park Program at this specific location -I do not dispute the merits of this program but believe that the location MUST be reconsidered. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Council testimony.docx Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Dear City Council Elected Officials, We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location. We do not dispute the merits of this program, or its intent. That said, we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes. The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe- this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods. We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity, such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently. We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs. We have the following asks of the city: • Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices- we have not been able to fully participate to date. • Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. • Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools) and home. • We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote- we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for Safe Parking projects are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for- please post this information publicly for all to access Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:02 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028618 IP Address: 73.96.138.219 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 11:02 Survey Time: 3 minutes,48 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Bull Mtn. Planning Committee Email Complete Address Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking project proposed for Bull. Mtn. neighborhood Comments We have submitted the following letter to our Senator, House,and Congress reps,and hope Council will consider it as they continue to move forward with implementing a project that does not include adequate safety parameters to prevent harm to children and families near the proposed location on Bull Mtn. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Senator Email (1).pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Dear Elected Officials, Thank you for taking the time to carefully review this letter in regards to concerns about the Safe Parking project proposed at the bottom of our neighborhood at Christ the King Lutheran Church in Tigard, OR, in district 13/26, 97224. Just Compassion EWC, Christ the King Lutheran Church, and the City of Tigard have partnered, with good intention, to implement 3 Safe Parking programs in our city. We do not dispute the merit of this partnership, nor the worthy goal of resolving the houseless crisis in and around Tigard. We each work diligently in our own capacities to impact homelessness. That said, we have deep concerns about the lack of criteria or program requirements in place to ensure Safe Parking programs are implemented in a way that reduces risk and harm to neighbors, schools, businesses, and private residences. As we know you are keenly aware, shelter projects located very near schools and homes can result in trauma to children and families. A horrific example of this occured in Beaverton only weeks ago. It is reasonable as parents to raise the flag of concern in order to prevent further harm that may occur as homeless projects are implemented near places where children frequent. The current Safe Parking project proposed near us has no plan for security or surveillance and no drug screening requirement. If approved, it will coexist within feet of private homes, daycares, and public school bus stops (where children are often unattended in the dark hours of the morning as they wait for their bus). Christ the King Lutheran Church in Tigard is simply an unsafe location for overnight homeless parking. There are many other locations nearby, farther away from homes and schools, that should be prioritized for projects like this. We have recently submitted a parking utilization study (attached) to the City of Tigard demonstrating ample space for a Safe Parking project on public parking lots. We understand that the State now requires all permits submitted to cities in Oregon to be automatically approved if they fall under the umbrella of "shelter" projects. This mandate, without proper criteria for safety, is irresponsible and has caused harm. It will continue to cause harm until you act to ensure this cutting of the red tape also comes with safety mandates and harm reduction measures for cities to follow as they approve permits and offer funding for homeless projects. We do not want to see the harm in Beaverton repeated in our neighborhood. We know you don't want this either. A further concern is that the City of Tigard has no legal recourse should this vehicle parking program extend beyond the parking lot of the church. The 72-hour abandoned vehicle law is not enforceable as it stands for overnight camping in cars. This is another likely risk to our neighborhood, and there is currently no plan to mitigate or prevent its occurrence, should this project move forward. On January 31, Christ the King Lutheran Church hosted an "information session" about the proposed project. Mayor Lueb attended. Over 500 neighbors showed up and expressed great opposition to the location for this program. Five news outlets covered this meeting. Despite this opposition, the City of Tigard continues to push forward with a plan to implement this program in the location of concern. Neither the Mayor nor Just Compassion EWC or the church have addressed constituents' rightful concerns around safety. We urge you to please, on behalf of your constituents, become more involved. We elected you because we trust your ability to collaborate to solve complex problems while keeping us ALL safe. We are confident the City of Tigard is capable of using publicly-owned land or private locations farther from schools and homes, for host overnight homeless parking, if they truly deem this a reasonable solution to the homeless crisis. Thank you for your consideration of our requests. We look forward to ongoing communication, and your thoughtful reply detailing steps you will take to ensure projects like this are executed well. In Solidarity, Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 10:58 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028602 IP Address: 73.96.138.219 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 10:58 Survey Time: 4 minutes, 57 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Lindsey Voorhees Email Complete Address 14336 SW 128th PI Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking on Bull Mtn. Comments Once again, I want to share my opposition to the location proposed for this Safe Parking project. It is much too close to schools, TTSD bus stops(where children are often unattended as they wait for buses in the dark hours of the morning),and private homes. Co-hosting an overnight shelter project WITHOUT security or overnight monitoring,and without a drug screening requirement, is risky.The likelihood of this bringing harm to our neighborhood is high. I URGE council members to re-think this, and at minimum, require safety criteria for any projects proposed in Tigard. Perhaps they shouldn't be located within a specific reasonable distance of schools and placed children frequent? Perhaps there should be a requirement that private security is hired and paid for by Just Compassion EWC or the hosting location.You cannot bring projects like this to our neighborhood without promising to take preventative measures to keep your constituents safe. It is not only irresponsible but not in alignment with the wishes of those who vote you into your elected role.Attached is a recent parking utilization study done by our neighbor,showing that INDEED,City Hall as plenty of space to host this project. Please consider it. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images TCH Parking Data Testimony.pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 February 15, 2024 Dear City Council Members, My name is Jim Wilkinson. I have only recently become a resident of Bull Mountain, near 150t1. I am a retired international Architect and Master Planner. I worked with the Bull Mountain Connect neighborhood planning team to conduct a parking space count and utilization survey for four parking lots at the Tigard City Hall property. It was suggested to not do a count on the day after the Superbowl (Monday 2/11), but I did one just to practice - at 10: 15 am. The next day, Tuesday, February 12, 2024, I did three utilization counts. These were done at 9:30am, 4:35pm and 7:45pm. After conducting the counts, I compiled the data onto an 8.5x11 inch graphic to make it easy to print out (see page 2). The four city parking lots I gathered data on are highlighted in red with yellow tone on the attached site plan, and also numbered. The site plan is compiled from the Google Earth Pro website. The parking counts are arranged by lot and time in a matrix below the site plan. We hope you will consider the time I took as an informed neighbor to gather this current data, and use it to plan for Safe Parking projects to be hosted on public property farther away from homes and schools. I look forward to continued engagement and discussion as this project is considered, with the goal to ensure it is executed safely for all neighbors near the proposed Christ the King Lutheran Church parking lot site. . . '.."/\4.0c:ik. '.., . ., . / eV' -t - ' ''".^ - ...%, . / , •' ,.• ' . ••-• 6/ N.• „ •",- -,, e ad Map k .• .. fr / / 4 '1,1LN • , : ,rf li l• l . IL l • 1`,tik„, r S„'.,, '.\• • -' .011....)...* . ;'. ,,:- 1 • pi ., . . • - . . : -,-7., - 1.. A , — , ../' L .• • ••• •..'" • c .:1., 1 r , . .. -... ... ,..,., r .:... . •a t a . :' 'Z' • :e .." a, • . fa ' ' ' IF , . • •. ..1.r 0 3.. •e, .• ,,, ..t4 .'•,:, N.,4 t pip ;- ee • .41t, ,• . - • '0114r, ' fm• ..* \ ,, •'•Aip ' II. ' . R • 1 . , . .,; ' • , rth , • i. 1 ,, ;'. ,,.. 1;" , • 6'6 Is i il.._ • ' ' Ili '''' '' 11‘ . 1 .:FR . PI, . e .... .., ,,,,.a, , • • .,.i ,....- .8 , %multi.11, ir. -- -------A--, 1...i.i.....z:.k.; .. ..„ ‘„ , .e. 0 . . 1---------'-- r—lit' - .214 • . • / Iri.e ,!," r• 14 ;•"•''..',4's" t'r . . 1;,, .1' , 1- -••. 4-::,f,• .i.'Pr:. ... ' 21' - . , f 1 . ..:e. v.,.. ....., :, , ,. : •Av,.. ... N... • .1!.4 - `4.:•'.,.,- , . . -4f.- . . ......... ' Monday 2/12 Tuesday 2/13 Tuesday 2/13 Tuesday 2113 • 10:15 am 9:30am 4:35 pm 7:45 pm • • 1 . 61)41 spaces. ' 24 26 10 3 , . 2c;24—o2tO • ' \\- 7, 1 8 12 7 3 1, . -i--( , '• _ '111—'1: v.,.,... 1,1?.._,—...,. • 3) ..1-.. ..", • '-• .....r.: 20 spaces ___ .;„,-. ._. . — 39 42 35 7 44sp• es ------ .. . ,. .. ' : h•.',. H-i'l:1(-51. 18 14 15 43 49 spaces Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 10:40 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028523 IP Address: 209.63.107.46 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 10:39 Survey Time: 3 minutes, 19 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Tyler Birdsey Email Complete Address 14665 SW Peachtree Drive Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said,we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We ask the following: Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools(including daycares and preschools)and home.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents. Ensure the permitting process for Safe Parking projects are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 10:17 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028427 IP Address: 73.25.212.53 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 10:16 Survey Time: 8 minutes, 6 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Margaret Hamilton Email Complete Address 14420 SW 114th Ave Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials, I am aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. I have heard that the City is planning on hosting an information meeting later this month to speak about the variety of services available to the homeless. I am hopeful that some of the community's questions and concerns will be heard and that we can work together to find a solution that will serve the community as a whole.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with children on site daily. In addition,a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, my family shares a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent. The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for drug-screening, overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city:-Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date.-Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard.-Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools)and homes.-We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:49 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028829 IP Address: 73.96.138.219 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 11:49 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 26 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jack Voorhees Email Complete Address 14336 SW 128th Place Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said,we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We have the following asks of the city:Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools(including daycares and preschools) and home.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for Safe Parking projects are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for-please post this information publicly for all to access Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard 1 This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:33 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028761 IP Address: 50.54.146.103 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 11:33 Survey Time: 7 minutes, 26 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Anna Murphy Email Complete Address Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Lots and Homeless Response Comments This is regarding the proposed"Safe Lots" program,and the broader response from the City of Tigard to the issue of homelessness in our community.We must be working from the same lexicon when discussing this issue.The definition of compassion is a deep awareness of the suffering of another accompanied by the wish to relieve it. In addition,the definition of enablement is the process of making someone able to do something or making something possible.The problem occurs when we enable people to engage in objectively harmful behavior and call it compassion. It is not compassionate to enable people to sleep in their cars. It is not compassionate to enable people to perpetuate a drug addiction with programs that do not require sobriety. Drug addiction is a progressive disorder that will lead to death if left untreated. It is not compassionate to enable people to camp in tents on the streets.Yet these are all policies and programs in Tigard and the state of Oregon today. I have heard residents repeatedly say they don't want to turn into Portland.Some of our neighbors have moved out of Portland to get away from the enabled public camping and open drug use.Yet our policies in Tigard have mirrored that of Portland:The time place and manner ordinance, programs with no sobriety requirements, and no community guardrails to prevent open drug use or encampments from spreading. It was shared with neighbors at the Zoom meeting with Just Compassion and Christ the King Lutheran Church that individuals are turning down housing vouchers in preference of camping in Tigard.The inference that can be made is that we have enabled more comfort on the streets or in cars than what being housed offers. Enabling objectively harmful behavior is not compassion, it's cruel. Until these programs,and the city, have guardrails to stop enabling objectively harmful behavior,they pose an unreasonable safety risk not only to the community but also to the people they claim to help. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:31 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028752 IP Address: 73.25.212.53 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 11:30 Survey Time: 22 minutes, 34 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Sevrin Hamilton Email Complete Address 14420 SW 114th Ave. Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments Thank you for taking the time to read and hear my concerns. I live next to Christ the King Lutheran Church,sharing a property line with their upper parking lot. I was never notified by the city or the Just Compassion or the church regarding this program.The potential negative impact this program could have on our community, my family's safety,and the value of our home,again leads me to ask that the City of Tigard reconsider this location for a SPP. I ask that there be a genuine open forum discussion amongst vested members of the community regarding the location and veracity of the program. I have been encouraged that the City Manager seems open to continued conversation and I'm grateful for this civil discourse and good will.Amidst this ongoing conversation, I would ask that criteria either be disclosed or established, in selecting a potential SPP site. I do not feel that the site at the church is a wise decision. Finally, I ask that any funding for this program be put to a Council vote. I know houselessness is a serious issue in the Portland Metro area. I am all for being a part of the solution.The solution is housing, not normalizing people living out of their vehicles for months at a time. I'm grateful for the ongoing discussion and hope that our elected officials will hear the reasonable and legitimate concerns of their constituents,and not pander or posture, but sincerely and humbly hear,evaluate,and consider the veracity of our concerns. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard 1 This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 9:01 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028125 IP Address: 50.38.48.89 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 9:00 Survey Time: 1 minute,49 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Patricia Fuhr Email Complete Address 16132 SW 113th Ave #168 Tigard,or 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Houseless Parking at Christ the King Comments I am writing today to express my concerns for the proposal to allow houseless vehicles at the church off 114th and Bull Mountain. My daughter and her family live 1/4 mile from the proposed site and have 3 elementary aged children.While I recognize the need for this program, I do not feel that the proposed location would provide the best service to either the houseless individuals and/or the families in the community.With no drug testing required, allowing participants to qualify with a "non-recent" history of sexual and violent crimes, limited supervision, no services within the immediate area,yet surrounded by residential living(i.e.children everywhere)and a close proximity to several schools,this does not seem like the right location for this project!!As a side not,Just Compassion has stated many times that they do not disclose the location of their parking spots,yet at this point everyone is aware of this location! I would plead for you to consider alternate locations for these types of projects and that any permits for these types of requests require a public/on the record vote!Thank you for taking the time to read my comments. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 8:59 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028119 IP Address: 50.38.48.89 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 8:58 Survey Time: 1 minute,27 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Darrick Purfield Email Complete Address 14535 SW McFarland Blvd Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking at Christ the King Church -opposed Comments I am writing today to express my concerns for the proposal to allow houseless vehicles at the church off 114th and Bull Mountain. I live 1/4 mile from the proposed site and have 3 elementary aged children. I love my neighborhood, my neighbors and have deep compassion for those that are less fortunate than myself.While I recognize the need for this program, I do not feel that the proposed location would provide the best service to either the houseless individuals and/or the families in the community.With no drug testing required, allowing participants to qualify with a "non-recent" history of sexual and violent crimes, limited supervision, no services within the immediate area,yet surrounded by residential living(i.e. children everywhere)and a close proximity to several schools,this does not seem like the right location for this project!!As a side not,Just Compassion has stated many times that they do not disclose the location of their parking spots,yet at this point everyone is aware of this location! I would plead for you to consider alternate locations for these types of projects and that any permits for these types of requests require a public/on the record vote!Thank you for taking the time to read my comments. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 8:57 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028108 IP Address: 50.38.48.89 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 8:56 Survey Time: 53 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Susan Purfield Email Complete Address 14535 SW McFarland Blvd Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Houseless Parking at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments I am writing today to express my concerns for the proposal to allow houseless vehicles at the church off 114th and Bull Mountain. I live 1/4 mile from the proposed site and have 3 elementary aged children.We love our neighborhood and our neighbors and have deep compassion for those that are less fortunate than ourselves.While I recognize the need for this program, I do not feel that the proposed location would provide the best service to either the houseless individuals and/or the families in the community.While I understand that there are no guarantees and that many of the houseless individuals are nice people,at this point everyone is aware of this location.With no drug testing,allowing participants to qualify with a "non-recent" history of sexual and violent crimes, limited supervision, no services within the immediate area, not to mention surrounded by residential living,this does not seem like the right location for this project!!! I would plead for you to consider alternate locations for these types of projects and that any permits for these types of requests require a public/on the record vote!Thank you for taking the time to read my comments. ********************************* I am writing today to express my concerns for the proposal to allow houseless vehicles at the church off 114th and Bull Mountain. I live 1/4 mile from the proposed site and have 3 elementary aged children. I love my neighborhood, my neighbors and have deep compassion for those that are less fortunate than myself.While I recognize the need for this program, I do not feel that the proposed location would provide the best service to either the houseless individuals and/or the families in the community.With no drug testing required, allowing participants to qualify with a "non-recent" history of sexual and violent crimes, limited supervision, no services within the immediate area,yet surrounded by residential living(i.e.children everywhere)and a close proximity Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 11:43 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3027403 IP Address: 166.199.8.63 Submission Date: 02/25/2024 11:43 Survey Time: 27 minutes, 57 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Kathleen Whitman Email Complete Address 11894 SW Aspen Ridge Dr Portland,Oregon 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Comments Dear City of Tigard Council, I believe a designated location nearer to city amenities would be a more ideal way to start this journey. For example,closer to the Tigard City Hall or closer to the Just Compassion site. Provide structured oversight and management of people sleeping/living in their cars. I understand that it is the goal to move the car people to apartments or single housing. Hope this works. It sure didn't work in downtown Portland. ************************************Why Multnomah County's plan to move hundreds of homeless campers into apartments utterly failed to meet its goals. Updated: Feb. 25, 2024,8:36 a.m.'Published: Feb. 25, 2024, Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2024 11:07 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3026608 IP Address: 50.38.61.190 Submission Date: 02/25/2024 11:06 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 50 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Judy Bueermann Email Complete Address 11926 Sw Aspen Ridge Dr Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Located at Christ the King church Hey 99 and Bull Mountain Road Comments Dear Mayor Lueb and Councilors,Again, requesting that you consider alternatives to the"Safe Parking" program being considered at the Christ the King church parking lot on Hwy 99 and Bull Mt. Road. I understand the need for safe parking, I also know there are alternatives. I have serious concerns about the location and safety of this project. One concern is the mental health of the residents already living in this neighborhood. I have witnessed the distress. Please consider using the parking lot at Tigard's City Hall. I am sighting safety for the client and the community.Vernon and Dorothy's place for the safe parking was revealed in a most unfortunate way;therefore endangering not only the surrounding area, but also their own clients. I don't know who put up the banner, made the leaflets or called the news, but the hostel exposure made the project unsafe. I hope to encourage Mayor Lueb and ALL involved to be a groundbreaking example and use the resources at the city's disposal,(the parking at City Hall). Follow the city of Tualatin's example. Maybe build a fence around the cars to be protected while using the seer fact of proximity to the police station as a deterrent for those that were not invited into the program.The questions regarding safety in the event of something going awry has not been addressed satisfactorily. Please reconsider this matter.Thank you,Judy Bueermann Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard 1 This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 11:23 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 3028710 IP Address: 50.39.217.96 Submission Date: 02/26/2024 11:22 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 31 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Janine Fender Email Complete Address 11333 SW Gaarde St. Tigard,Oregon 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Just Compassion Safe Parking Location Comments THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING MY CONCERNS. I AM A MOTHER OF SIX PRECIOUS CHILDREN NEAR THE CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images City Council Elected Officials .pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 2/26/2024 Dear City Council Elected Officials, We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. I attended the first public information meeting last month to learn more and express my concerns. This meeting was overflowing & while several of our concerns were made mention by others in attendance, there was very little time given to continue to hear the concerns of those of us who will be most affected by the proposed location choice of the Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church. This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location. I live close by and have 6 children. We moved from SE Portland to Tigard for several reasons but one major benefit to our family was that there was not a visible homeless population present in Tigard. This meant less drug influx & influence in our immediate neighborhood. We have been so blessed over these past 5+ years to see our police men enforcing the laws around us. It has been a peaceful place to raise our children. We have great concerns with this new proposed location for the Safe Parking endeavor. We do not dispute the merits of this program, or its intent. That said, we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes. The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe- this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods. We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity, such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently. We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs. We have the following asks of the city: • Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices- we have not been able to fully participate to date. 2/26/2024 • Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. • Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools) and homes. • We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote- we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents • Ensure the permitting process for Safe Parking projects are public and available- we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for- please post this information publicly for all to access Thank you so very much for taking the time to listen to and address the concerns of your Tigard constituents about this matter. Many Blessings, Janine Fender (mother of 6 children) AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.C. - PUBLIC COMMENT DATE: February 27, 2024 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record.The names and cities of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes,which is a public record. Please review the"Tigard City Council Protocol for Public Comment." NAME & CITY YOU LIVE IN TOPIC Please Print 1 Name t1)414,_ City / / 1 Please spell your name as it unds i it will hel the presi.:r g officer 66\14k-t i f' pronounce: b p ( t A u Q w �' Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information:E01 Ch-ck one: Phone or email V Fore.-: Against ❑ Neutral❑ Name Ves City C;_,-(-2 __. \ tl<‘.. 3Please spell o r name as it sounds if it will hel the residin officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: �1 Check one: 17v- Phone or email Sea �1v � l/ 1'`(�t ` For ❑ Againsi Neutral ❑ Name Ke_ \\ kak-- Cityf i))e KA \\[\AKI IS b P\ Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer *. pronounce:LA e Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email e r' CtE2 COH'1l/'Fl . !�2 For ❑ Against Neutral ❑ Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: _.... Check one: Phone or email For ❑ Against ❑ Neutral ❑ 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4.C. - PUBLIC COMMENT DATE: February 27, 2024 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record.The names and cities of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes,which is a public record. Please review the"Tigard City Council Protocol for Public Comment." NAME & CITY YOU LIVE IN TOPIC Please Print Name 6A-R� �3Pt� City 1- [ rE (W tL, (. Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer ` pronounce: D /mo �? Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For ❑ Against ❑ Neutral ❑ Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For ❑ Against ❑ Neutral ❑ Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For ❑ Against ❑ Neutral ❑ Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: _.._ Check one: Phone or email For ❑ Against 0 Neutral 0 AIS-5435 6.A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/27/2024 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Action Plan Contract Authored By: Toni Riccardi Presented By: Project Manager Courtney Furman Item Type: Motion Requested Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing Yes Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication 12/13/2023 Date in Newspaper: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The purpose of this action is to approve the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Action Plan contract. ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract to Toole Design in the estimated amount of$325,000.00 and authorize the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The contract before the Local Contract Review Board tonight is for the City of Tigard's Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Action Plan to develop a comprehensive transportation safety action plan. In coordination with Oregon Metro and regional partners, the City of Tigard applied for and was successfully awarded $240,000 in federal SS4A funding to develop a comprehensive transportation safety action plan. Not only will the completed plan support Tigard's broad transportation safety objectives,but it will also allow the city to apply and compete for capital funding in future SS4A funding cycles. Work included under this contract will include an adopted comprehensive transportation safety action plan meeting the 554A eligibility criteria: 1.Leadership Commitment a. Council resolution committing to achieve zero roadway fatalities and serious injuries by a date certain, or% reduction by a date certain with an eventual goal of zero roadway fatalities and serious injuries. 2. Planning Structure a. Creation of a task force or similar body with oversight of plan development,implementation, and monitoring. 3. Planning Process Inputs a. Develop safety analysis of existing conditions and historical trends setting a baseline of crashes involving fatalities and serious injuries. b. Robust engagement with the public and stakeholders that allows for direct feedback. c. Plan development using inclusive and representative processes. Identification of underserved communities. Analysis inclusive of population characteristics and initial equity impact assessments of proposed projects and strategies. 4. Planning Process Outcomes a. Assessment of current policies,plans,guidelines, and/or standards to identify opportunities to improve transportation safety b. List of specific projects, strategies, descriptions of programs, and explanation of prioritization criteria used. c. List of interventions focused on infrastructure, behavioral, and/or operational safety. d. Description of how progress will be measured over time and includes, at a minimum, outcome data. The comprehensive transportation safety action plan will build off the recent resolution of commitment by the City of Tigard to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries using a safe systems approach to prioritize transportation safety (Resolution No. 23-25). The city issued a Qualification Based Solicitation (QBS) process (Tigard Public Contracting Rule 70.016) for the project on December 13, 2023,with the notice published in the Daily Journal of Commerce. Upon closing, the city received three proposals and their respective qualification scores: •Toole Design •Kittelson&Associates •Fehr&Peers The proposal from Toole Design,was found to be the top-ranking firm after the qualification based scoring using the RFP criteria. They were found to be responsible and attractive with the approach and pricing.As such, and in accordance with Tigard Public Contracting Rule 70.016.B.5.A, the city entered into negotiations with Toole Design for contract pricing.The city and Toole Design were able to reach an agreed upon price and scope of work.As this work fell under the Qualification Based Solicitation process and a cost was agreed upon between the city and the top-ranking firm, the city did not need to request pricing from the other firms (Tigard Public Contracting Rule 70.16.B.5).The contract will be for 1 year. The cost of the contract is estimated at$325,000. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The Local Contract Review Board may choose to not award this contract and direct staff to resolicit for the work. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES None Fiscal Impact Cost: $325,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: CIP 95079 - Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Additional Fiscal Notes: The cost of the proposed contract would be incurred in FY 2024 and FY 2025. Attachments Scoring Summary Request for Proposal Evaluation Scoring Summary 2024 - Safe Streets and Roads For All (SS4A) EVALUATION SUMMARY a7 a) c) O Q Evaluation Criteria d06 o_ a� 1 Proposer Required P P P P Information 2 Firm Qualifications and 105 102 94 87 Project Team 3 Project Understanding and 75 74 69 67 Approach 4 Project Management 75 72 67 63 5 6 7 Total 255 248 230 217 SECTION 5 PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION 5.1 Evaluation Process A selection committee assembled by the City will review written proposals. After meeting the mandatory requirements, the proposals will be evaluated on their technical and fee aspects. For the purpose of scoring proposals,each committee member will evaluate each proposal in accordance with the criteria listed in Section 4. The committee may seek the assistance of outside expertise,including,but not limited to,technical advisors. The City will evaluate and score the submitted proposals as follows: 1. Transmittal Page Pass/Fail 2. Firm Qualifications and Project Team 35 Points 3. Project Understanding and Approach 25 Points 4. Project Management 25 Points 5. Cost Proposal 20 Points Total Evaluation Points 100 Points AIS-5441 6. B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/27/2024 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: 72nd Avenue Pre-Design Contract Authored By: Toni Riccardi Presented By: Project Manager Courtney Furman Item Type: Motion Requested Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing Yes Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication 11/27/2023 Date in Newspaper: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The purpose of this action is to approve the 72nd Avenue Pre-Design contract. ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract to Kittelson&Associates in the estimated amount of$700,000.00 and authorize the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The contract before the Local Contract Review Board tonight is for the City of Tigard's 72nd Avenue Pre-Design to develop up to a 10% engineered design based on the preferred alignment from the 72nd Avenue Transportation Corridor Study for SW 72nd Avenue between Pacific Highway and Highway 217. The Project will further develop the north section of SW 72nd Avenue between Pacific Highway and Dartmouth Street to a 30% engineered design. Included in the design considerations is the future Red Rock Creek Trail crossing. The design will promote the complete street design concept and will create safe and continuous bicycle and pedestrian routes with sidewalks, cycle tracks (protected bike lanes), on-street parking and bus pull-outs. The city issued a Qualification Based Solicitation (QBS) process (Tigard Public Contracting Rule 70.016) The issued a Qualification Based Request for Proposal for the project November 27, 2023,with the notice published in the Daily Journal of Commerce. Upon closing, the city received four proposals and their respective qualification scores: •Kittelson&Associates •Wallis Engineering •Dowl,LLC. •Otak, Inc. The proposal from Kittelson&Associates,was found to be the top-ranking firm after the qualification scoring based on the identified criteria in the RFP was completed. They were found to be responsible and attractive with the approach and pricing.As such, and in accordance with Tigard Public Contracting Rule 70.016.B.5.A, the city entered into negotiations with Kittelson&Associates for contract pricing. The city and Kittelson&Associates were able to reach an agreed upon price and scope of work. The contract will be for 1 year. The cost of the contract is estimated at$700,000. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The Local Contract Review Board may choose to not award this contract and direct staff to re-solicit for the work. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES None Fiscal Impact Cost: $700,000 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: CIP#95072—72nd Avenue Pre-Design Additional Fiscal Notes: The cost of the proposed contract would be incurred in FY 2024 and FY 2025. Attachments Scoring Summary Request for Proposal Evaluation Scoring Summary 95072 72nd Ave Pre-Design EVALUATION SUMMARY a7 a) U)c .� •a U Za) d N J a N Evaluation Criteria a' a' J Q w o cco N p 0 o m Y 1 Proposer Required Information 2 Firm Qualifications and 175 131 126 125 137 Project Team 3 Project Understanding and 125 86 79 83 91 Approach 4 Project Management 125 91 85 82 96 5 Price Evaluation 75 42 N/A N/A 50 6 7 Total 500 350 290 290 374 SECTION 5 PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION 5.1 Evaluation Process A selection committee assembled by the City will review written proposals. After meeting the mandatory requirements, the proposals will be evaluated on their technical and fee aspects. For the purpose of scoring proposals,each committee member will evaluate each proposal in accordance with the criteria listed in Section 4. The committee may seek the assistance of outside expertise,including, but not limited to, technical advisors. The City will evaluate and score the submitted proposals as follows: 1. Transmittal Page Pass/Fail 2. Firm Qualifications and Project Team 35 Points 3. Project Understanding and Approach 25 Points 4. Project Management 25 Points Total Evaluation Points 85 Points 5.2 Price Evaluation After evaluation of the written proposals,the City will invite up to the three (3)highest ranked Proposers to submit a detailed breakdown of costs based on the scope of work. The proposed fee structure should include hourly rates for each person assigned and the level of effort based on anticipated duration and hours for the project. An additional 15 points in scoring will be assigned to the cost structure criteria. 5.3 Presentation/Interview At the option of the City, the City may invite up to the three (3) highest ranked Proposers to make a presentation of their proposal.This will provide an opportunity to clarify and elaborate on the proposal. The City will schedule the time and location of these presentations (if necessary) and notify the selected firms. (may be conducted virtually via Microsoft Teams) Should one or more firms be selected for oral interviews, an additional 20 points will be assigned to the interview process and will be added to the participating Proposers' total points. 5.4 Clarification of Proposals The City reserves the right to obtain clarification of any point regarding a proposal or to obtain additional information necessary to properly evaluate a particular proposal. Failure of a Proposer to respond to such a request for additional information or clarification could result in rejection of their proposal. 5.5 Negotiations with Top Ranked Firm and Contractor Selection Following the selection committee's final determination of the highest scored Proposer, the City will issue a Notice of Intent to Award and begin contract negotiations with the top ranked Proposer regarding conditions, compensation level, schedule and performance of the scope of services. After good faith negotiations,if the City and the top ranked Proposer are unable to agree, then the City will move to the second ranked Proposer and enter into negotiations.The process shall repeat until either the City and a firm come to an agreement or the City determines the project unfeasible at this time and elects to re-scope and re-solicit the work. 5.5 Protest of Contract Award In accordance with Tigard Public Contracting Rule 30.135, any adversely affected Proposer has seven (7) calendar days from the date of the written Notice of Intent to Award to file a written protest. In order to be adversely affected,a Proposer must itself claim to be eligible for award of the contract and must be next in line for award. The written protest must be timely and specify the grounds upon which the protest is based. The City will not entertain a protest submitted after the time period established in this section. AIS-5423 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/27/2024 Length (in minutes):25 Minutes Agenda Title: Washington County Transit Vision Project Briefing Authored By: Dave Roth Presented By: Dyami Valentine,Washington County Principal Transportation Planner and Dave Roth,Tigard Principal Transportation Planner Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Joint Meeting-Board or Other Juris. Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Council to receive a briefing on the Washington County Transit Vision Project. Provide feedback,if any, on the proposed vision ACTION REQUESTED Receiving information on the Washington County Transit Vision Project BACKGROUND INFORMATION Developed over 18-months and informed through extensive community engagement, the Washington County Transit Study identifies a vision for public transit in the county for the next 20 years. The project was led by Washington County and a consultant team in partnership with the cities of Tigard,Beaverton, Hillsboro, and Tualatin. Tigard teammates participated in the project Technical Work Group. Key outcomes of the Study include: •Clearly identifying transit needs in the County •Creating a vision that is grounded in the experience of transit users •Identification of actions the County and its local partners can take to support transit such as giving buses priority,improving access to stops and stations, and strengthening regional partnerships Within Washington County today,public transit includes bus,MAX, Community Connector, on-demand, and shuttle service. Transit remains a vital mode of travel for many members of the Washington County community. Despite declines in ridership during the COVID pandemic, many people who live in,work in, and visit Washington County still rely on transit to get to work, school,medical appointments, and other key destinations. With continued population and employment growth in the county,investments in frequent and reliable transit can serve to offset growth in vehicular trips and related congestion. Further, increasing the share of trips taken on transit is a requirement of meeting local,regional, and statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Transit needs within Washington County vary widely due to varied land use contexts as well as individual mobility needs. The Transit Vision is responsive to the diversity of needs across the county by recommending different levels of transit service and investments tailored to the local context. Recommendations are focused on expanding access to frequent transit, making transit a more reliable travel option, and by improving actual and perceived safety while accessing,waiting for, and riding transit. Within Tigard, the Transit Vision recommends new shuttle services,preparation for future high-capacity transit, transit priority treatments,improved bike and pedestrian access to transit,land use policy recommendations, and expanded frequent bus service. The Transit Vision also provides several performance metrics to track progress over time. These include transit ridership,reduction in per capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and transit mode share. The project team is currently soliciting public feedback through an online open house until March 1st, 2024. The draft project recommendations and executive summary are currently posted on the project website. Completion of the project and release of the final report is anticipated in April 2024. Tigard 2020 - 2025 Strategic Plan Vision Objective 2.2: Tigard's pedestrian network is attractive, accessible, safe, and well maintained. Objective 3.1: Pursue land development that maximizes public health benefits while increasing connections between people and community destinations. Objective 3.2: Focus development-associated resources in parts of the city that have the capacity to serve, house, employ, and attract the most people with the least impact on Tigard's natural systems and the climate. Objective 3.3: Understand the effects of development on vulnerable Tigard residents and mitigate these impacts within projects and over time. Objective 3.5: Plan and create in a manner that reduces climate impacts to the maximum extent practicable, especially for those most vulnerable. Tigard Council Goals 2023 - 2025 Strategy 2.1: Prioritize carbon responsibility in the City of Tigard operations,projects, and policies. Strategy 4.3: Increase funding to expand connectivity + support an active, healthy, and accessible community. Tigard 2040 Transportation System Plan Policy 1: Provide a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users. Policy 2: Support environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and addressing unequal health impacts/outcomes of our transportation system on low-income communities and communities of color. Policy 3: Improve quality of life for all,particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities, by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with convenient and affordable travel options. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION N/A ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Draft Washington County Transit Vision Executive Summary (January 2024) attached. Attachments WC Transit Vision PPT WC Transit Vision Draft Executive Summary Supplemental Packet for February 27, 2024 ` ` Council Meeting - No.Item 7 g.111114Mili A 1°It.O EGO ` 14!.11.7.51001 -was in ton ._• 77 �� -_ 'w' '�-fir _ ' ^ ' °'- •- - r �'" • .0 .•l• ' F"6'• �,• .i*-# ��w'- ti• �. 4'` I • • ' sil � twAllp ' ' ' - { _ • 1#1. ' •. • • ,d • • i II • • _ y t Study _ n lir 1.if.. ' ''-.1P m-..lip-, :.1 7.." 1-' it,' 1'1. . -':' A:: 'III. " 1 I 4. ' I . u,___' a!I I 47" .1 r.a'1114:1112.Ci .'II::: . 71.. . .. • '4J' t# 4�"r r* vrio It} i y �.r a L#` - }• I.' h 3 #1 }• —J11S' ' ON* 111111Pedlifilt .-•.:: ,: ilf . • i;Air vi...-01.,Ntleik, . 9.7 lir*. . ill 'i •••91K• • 4016„ • .91 •.. -. 7:.. .!.••• i _ . dia f r"`r . ...... . '9 .0 . ' '•111011 . 01 ' 3 •M'.. •I• 7-,k • 41.111. t ..il• . b. ••• 'till••••• .'4•• .L dt-el • '11 _... _._ - 1 ...1 •e. , . . .4,.._ , 4 , ..p. . %.= .1, . y... 4'. . :E. II. V ..V. . lel . .. ..r V: . 1-" . ..- 1 qr 11111"1 : 114 ..i..11L, •••5. O �� r ' �J J tgit , r V.,h, ' 5 •r7 i ��i_ r}. ' ti. _ • w, '� , ..A. s. .. :1 . 1 •I ::I 1. 0 . .... •..-k is ._ i ....-.. I.: • - T1..,' r . it. ' 9::• "Ir A IV• . i 1 .1.'' . ..-„, p . , I. or. 4.i . '.! . .. -t'fi', .--3: - ' : .i ..:• •. ' • . . ii —.lire —4. V• '15.1.. ril• „ -- - „. -- am! • F • ' •ter • _ '• - .ad. 41• • 9 • • ' I • x.' k -ti * -%1A .,S i.ti:nom 's I,tl. . A. _ • Iilli r r. -vo . „, Sir 40.i • • iiipp..i.. .. . . . _ 1 'tis f' lik } _. :41 • — . . _ • — ti - - Ilk - Tigard City Council Feb. 27 2024 Land Use & Transportation www.washingtoncountyor.gov Project Enhance our transit system to helpet to more more .: 4 _„,_ .., erti .._.places and meet theneeds of { . =4 t _ _ . k ...1MB MP 1a 3..e. .t. { —�M s tis / ` 1 n,7' :_,,„,„,- , ... ._�.w.w.r.�.w.w.w.� v I .... ..... . rid e s • ,.. 'r .. M ,r •s�• r. !ti r4. r Y ;ar • , ,. • . „ . ,........ :, .. . ,...,,,.___... 41 . I 58 Y. , 4 r:„... \. 111 . r :# may \ > SII 20 so . �” AI .�. I. J i _ - , ► h _,-- - , _ 171 1 Develop vision and - - 11 _ , Y i _ l 8 • nn•sn — .1 / - — roadmapto et it one .create a -- _ . N I C 2934 : "•.Ilto}+r. .` ...liar — / `ft . -_ - e` - - ...7.--- _, J - ------- -7 ,,7 www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation Project -> A v. , miruh 1 4011.06, ,(_) mraglialliir 0 0 Equity ■ Improve access to Reduce greenhouse gas opportunities with more emissions and improve equitable and affordable environmental health. options for transit. i 2 2 2 E a ,-,Iffr.AP Irk Illi ____N r I Aim . \irtirl, , f A . Mk imi s Economic Vitality ustomer Ex . erience Partnerships Better connect people and Make transit easier to use. Support a transit system in Washington places to transit. County that will be successful long-term. www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation . Our process The Transit Vision was developed over 18 months It r j el F .� Y�� and wasguldedbya .. it Technical Work Groupand Technical Work Group #1 Technical Work Group #2 Stakeholder Workshop #1 Online Open House and Community Roundtables community stakeholders. QJA. • . . p , i= III I m SUMMER FALL EARLY WINTER LATE WINTER Project Kickoff Best Practices Goals & Vision Needs Identification w i 11 1 e i It 1 1 e i 1 1 11 i 1 4.°P 1 it Public Comment Technical Work Group #5 Technical Work Group #4 Technical Work Group #3 Stakeholder Workshop #3 Stakeholder Workshop #2 Note: 1 (2)0 0 c c c 2022 2023 WINTER FALL SUMMER SPRING 2024 Final Vision Draft Vision Evaluation Draft Recommendations www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation 4 Community input Working well Barriers to transit use • Affordability • Feeling unsafe • Convenience • Longer travel times than driving • Ability to avoid • Stops located too far away from destinations traffic • Lack of sidewalks and safe crossings near • Ride Connection stops services • Service not frequent enough , especially on weekends • Lack of information and education www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation -> Communityinput Tigard YAC Public transportation is.. . . +llMentimeter Safe z.s v Comfortable z.s V � L}-�� nyJ' + a Fun o-) 4±3 TT) Fast T:5) Q 31rn 0 ti Easy to use Affordable 3.8 . www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation 6 Online —> Which of the following improvements to transit would you like to see? ( check all that apply ) ( N=300 ) Respondent Category . Transit Rider ( N=300 ) A trip on transit is almost as fast as driving 47.7% Buses or trains arrive more often, so I don't have to wait as long 44.7 Getting to and waiting at stops is safer and more comfortable 4 .7 Transit runs more often in the evening and on weekends 40.7% .111 co I feel safer while on the bus, train, or shuttle 38.7% c Buses and trains run on schedule 32.0% Other ( please specify) 16.3% Transit fares cost less 14.7% Prefer not to answer4 O 0 % 10% 20% 30 % 40% 50% Proportion of www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & TransportationRespondents Online What gets in the way of you taking transit? ( check all that apply) ( N=128 ) Respondent Category Non Transit Riders ( =128) Transit is too slowJA157.00A I don't feel safe while riding the bus, train, or shuttle Stops are not close enough to my home, work, or other destination 43.0% I don't feel safe walking to and/ or waiting at stops 30.5% a. Transit is unreliable - Ican'tdependonitgettingmetomydestinationontime 28.1% The schedule (days of week or times of day) doesn't work for me 24.2 Other ( please specify) 23.4% The community where I live or work is not served by transit 15.6% The fare is too costly for my budget 3.1% Prefer not to answer - 1.6% www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation ° ° ° Proportion of Respondents ., Prepare priority transit corridors for high - ca . acit transit HCT • Beaverton - Forest Grove via TV Hwy - Line 57 1 1=1 • Tualatin - Portland Southwest Corridor Light Rail Transit • Beaverton - Portland Line 54 • Beaverton - Bethany via Farmington Road/ 185th Avenue - Line 52 • Sunset Transit Center- Hillsboro HCT via US 26/ Evergreen Parkway • Beaverton -Tigard -Tualatin -Oregon City HCT - Line 76 • Sherwood -Tigard HCT via Hwy 99W • Beaverton -Wilsonville in vicinity of WES ( with 15 - minute frequency all day) www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation , • Ad t t b * Id t f t * d Irii Orchard • \iVashingtonCountyand t. Van�ouyer Frequent Service Banks North Plains y - ove its seekto � - . ti., Frequent Service Vision St Johns Airport Existing ~ • ' `r _`T ' • Near-Term{Funde d} build out the frequent - r i Rae Creek �; �� �� � Near-Term(Priority) _ Bethany .ti T Mid- toanger-Term� , , 41 '_�-_ d Orenco iliTan our et • _.Holl 'a.d 1141 seryiceri r the ,Fore tGro a . •—• Amber,. len `Ti •qillIll Cede Mill „� _ TgT:,!.. " .. Tether Service TrlMet Bus Routes Nn4\ Cone_l_ius Hillsboro T r•Y4 I � ,! otland• iGate . * k i • s,f { • Ride Connection Shuttle ttie next 20years • r ` _ _ - ` - - 1--,„, ,5 ` +luh ;� lT i3�lelgn�i l rt - MAX WES , •Beaverton{ e Lents.. . 0 Transit Centers + Washington South Xga 1;o o;4 •. + Square T ,� , Gaston'-'11111111""11111111.11-1 1 � Gau :ie' _ .. . lurray/Scholis T Laclianias TriMet Seruice Boundary Figarli --- JWashington County i ( 0•w•go'j King City1t �•_� Gladstone L 1 rualatii __ >r,--- r , r Oregon Ckty I �! w I !Sherood ? iii)' i ,11= . i L - -- 111.,t,__ ''.)1, - ii. I I I ' `Wi€ olle • 0 5 Miles 0 A.www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation 10 � Implement additional shuttle service 1 1 The Vision for Transit builds on the successful partnerships among Washington County, TriMet and Ride Connection to expand use of shuttles and community connectors to additional service areas . • On - demand or community connector services can provide cost- effective shared rides that can help connect people to frequent transit service . • Employers beyond the reach of transit can fund a shared -shuttle service from transit centers to help retain and attract employees . www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation � Speed and reliability improvements L- 11,. ft • Local jurisdictions that manage roads and traffic signals play an important role in making improvements on streets to help buses run faster and more reliably. • Small improvements along a bus route can help riders save time . www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation Improve amenities d t t . Local juriscanhelp makeaIIstopsandstations i tsafewelcoming make access e, so seamless connections across the r , . r .. „ . •<„,-..,...,_ _ . .. .1111%li .4* 0 it � N M1 lb • ....... . i t 44400400. ii r ,_. . • ,.. ....., , ,..... ....... .....,.... ....„ RR :pV;1 .... ,......, ......... ..... . 6. ... . . . ._ - 1111 Tn41. .4.-' di* "Nip.. 11 . : '161:11:0 :::11::: r. ' ' 1: ° ' I 1191 : Ill‘ •'-' .--4e: : - '''. .c:::::1 '6 4:tii. ' -- .. ,. ........ .... , . ,, ............. ,... ,. _ 1116---> r. 0 lie. An.. -41*I* it ,,:-.' . II% 14 ii ') ..,: „al • lir ..,.. bill he. ilitrall_t 2._ ' 1#a'''' . •.t.' : . , NII 141 ler 1N: ,,. :,-0, 's ., .• • %II ‘ --e'''. . 0: a.•- doll ,••-* *I .. 4114 010: • • ' • .. • '...'1.067 - aje--- ILZi 1 if . ,i -".-ig". • ' •t 4 11111101 41/1111 � i 4 lig ; www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation 13 Improve bike and pedestrian access to transit 6 .II. • All transit trips begin and end with a pedestrian trip . • Jurisdictions can implement strategies to improve safe access to transit . • Well - lit, ADA-accessible sidewalks • Provide frequent, safe and convenient crossings www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation _, Implement transit supportive programs and . olicies Local jurisdictions play a critical role in designing streets 7 11 and focusing development in areas that are or can be well - served by transit . • Concentrate residential housing, jobs and services near frequent transit . • Align major destinations along direct corridors served by frequent transit . • Provide a rich mix of uses that support street- level activity throughout the day and night . www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation _, Build partnerships to enhance service coordination and fundin : 8 a... • Strong partnerships with transit providers, jurisdictions, Washington County and private partners are needed to implement the Vision for Transit recommendations . • More — or redirected — funding will be needed to improve service and the supportive elements that improve the transit experience . • Statewide conversations about funding to improve transit and reduce vehicle congestion present opportunities for Washington County and cities to realize the Vision for Transit . www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation to Srtmade&Astila RAtUVI C6rilloirelipri 10 Mirth PO(IPd mil Vatic Vision Bdk w■ sr To 1 North Frequent rpt S ervic e. ViSiO . . .. • - . ‘ ' Ex itirlg / FSI nd ed . - r..41 Near Thtn1 • .• j L . • - ?lid- to Longer-Term . , . - . - - - . _ _ - Shuttle Service V1210r1 Forest *jn'llu FI,II �rQ PON . L rlraige "MI' ihti rig 1 Funded . I . ab. 117 ••1 1 141111 i •d 1 Near-Term r 4: 4 mid. ... Longer-Thrm r_ - 4,,,NI U Al. 1 * rT1In kf i stoiyula service zone cit! Ceif?c.ptufl+aid r� llt ...limo would be refined prior to implementorion F31' . 1-Jo - Future C cin n ctEQn UV an ?titure Citorkitecilein rati, between Soul.' ' astii{ torti • A: Comm Hill!bcrro &Ivan iiiiTF tr TI S OtIar Transit S r�rice !rpm :7 ► Connecricrn to ., SOkith MUILnOr h OM MAXLight Rail I within county) King. Regional liCT{out-of-county) 410 City Local Service (within county) "IV Tee. In Regional Connector To Oregon L1ty . C rnilt�t'Merp illIJUSEtarrrig primiry JnwIS[M tS, &WAS r at tall exiarrig seti4teis or r uti " m. To Yiru4 l Coni To Wilsonville ir Salem 0 5 11 ile-s Capital Investment Vancouver Priorities Banks North Plains Transit Priority Investments Hillsboro -Sunset ' Planned Regional HOT Corridor r2 Transit Center (f) and/or Portland Potential HOT Extensions Forest Grove- ■ to Existing or Planned HCT Corridors Hillsboro Evergreen L, E (LRT Extension) _ o Priority Transit Corridor Portland Central City MAX Tunnel Existing or Planned ornell01 46%1111111Ca Portland Frequent Service Corridors . — w . . . . . . . . • Cot, ,,,,, Forest Cornelius Hillsboro • tee` game Grove v) ■ Top 10 High Priority ca Speed & Reliability TV Highway 11 1I Intersections c Alo a 3. A► Beaverton 4 Beaverton-Portland U -C .,- (via Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy) Bethany-Beaverton n Tualatin- - (via Farmington/185th) Hart Beaverton Gaston 03 /.104 % Southwest r Corridor Scholls Tigard Ferry Sherwood-Tigard King (via Pacific Hwy) City s Tualatin r4, ). �ualatirti I Sherwood Sherwood I To Clackamas County Schematic map illustrating priority investments. Does not show all existing services or routing details. I I I To Wilsonville / Salem I 0 5 Miles 0 Next steps WASHINGTON COUNTY EL ESTUDIO DE TRANSPORTE TRANQ ' TQ � � PUBLICODELCONDADO DE WASHINGTON • Draft recommendations • Draft Executive Summary available at the following link : https ://www.washingtoncountyor. gov/lut/ planning/documents/washington - county-transit-vision -draft-executive-summa download ? inline • Public comment (Jan . 19 — Mar. 1 ) • Online open house : https ://transitvision2O24 .washcoopenhouses . org/index . php • Final report ( April ) 0 0 Iiii ki -h. eroctil30 www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation 19 Thank you ! Dyami Valentine, Washington County dyami_valentine@washingtoncountyor. gov www.washingtoncountyor.gov I Land Use & Transportation GTON �•p szt,41 01;dmmilli um< O/?EGO1 ‘ Land Use & Transportation www.washingtoncountyor.gov 21 WASHINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT VISION Drnft PKecutive Summary January 2024 o cpb WASHINGTON COUNTY artment of P TRANSIT STUDY o„EGo� Land Use 8( Transportation WHAT IS THE TRANSIT VISION? The Washington County Vision for the next 20 years is to serve the varying travel needs of people who live, work, and visit Washington County and help more people get to more places on transit. Our county is expansive and transit needs vary widely depending on the person and the local context. The Transit Vision is responsive to the diversity of needs across the county by recommending different levels of transit service and investments tailored to the local context. The Vision supports the County's climate and equity goals, responds to emerging policies at the state and regional levels, and establishes clear roles and responsibilities for partners across the County and region to help make transit a preferred way of travel. The Transit Vision is grounded in improving the rider experience by: Expanding access to Making transit a more Improving actual and 4.. 1-y_s_., frequent transits reliable travel option perceived safety accessing, waiting for, and riding transit IMPLEMENTING THE TRANSIT VISION Many partners play an important role in delivering a great transit experience for the residents, employees, and visitors of Washington County: • Local jurisdictions are critical partners in ensuring transit is given priority and can operate efficiently, there are safe and accessible ways to connect to transit, and land use patterns and policies are designed to support transit. • Transit agency partners play a critical role in operating and delivering transit. • Non-profit and private sector partners play a critical role in promoting, funding, and sometimes delivering transit. The Transit Vision details the shared roles and responsibilities of all partners in the region to deliver an improved transit experience in the county. 1 Washington County Transit Vision HOW DOES TRANSIT BENEFIT :416. ii , ii WASHINGTON I ■ I *kWh wil r' COUNTY? `:7imIv �� �rw 1 Supports a healthy environment. ^ Increases access to employment centers. Tailpipe emissions are the leading contributor Convenient transit options give employees to ozone and other air pollutants.Taking access to some of the region's biggest transit reduces greenhouse gas emissions. employment centers. r�ri-_. • 1 I.6 III • , 11 A ■ 111 1 1 - w pgabi A •' L mmoum I G I 1 0 AI • 3 Supports sustainable growth. A Supports accessibility and affordability. 5 Connects people to opportunities. Transit supports growth by moving more people lin Transit provides affordable options for people who Reliable and fast transit service helps connect in the same amount of space on our roads. rely on public transit to meet their daily needs. people to more opportunities like jobs and services. o At t t q WASHINGTON COUNTY Cab o� `i TRANSIT STUDY 2 WHY A TRANSIT VISION NOW? A shared Transit Vision is needed because: • Transit remains a lifeline for many. Despite declines in transit ridership in recent years, many people who live and work in Washington County still rely on transit to get to work, school, medical appointments, and other key destinations. These residents and workers need transportation options that are affordable and reliable. • The County's population and employment growth is expected to increase. Washington County's population is expected to increase between 41-55% by 2055. It's also expected that there will be at least twice as many jobs in the county. Transit is the most efficient way to move people. Transit needs to be a viable option to meet the growing travel demands and make more efficient use of our transportation network. • Local and regional climate and equity goals demand action now. Our communities must act now to encourage more people to take transit for more trips to support the region's climate, equity, and mode share goals. The 2023 Regional Transportation Plan sets an aggressive target to triple the transit mode share for all trips from 4.1% in 2020 to 12.2% by 2045.1 • New state and regional policies are elevating the need to identify the County's priorities and invest in transit. The Climate-Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) Rulemaking requires jurisdictions to limit parking requirements and better manage parking - two strategies that will require enhanced transit options. The Oregon Tolling Project will also mean that tolling will be collected on freeways over the next decade. A prioritized list of transit projects is needed to provide viable travel options for those potentially impacted by tolling. 1 Draft Metro Regional Transportation Plan (2023). Table 7.2: Summary of draft system analysis results and Table 7.3:2023 RTP transit performance results. Jr 4 Imcl , ■■■■■ WHAT WAS OUR PROCESS? The Transit Vision was developed over 18 months it r I and was guided by a ! lk -O. 4111. a i I L i e Technical Work Group#1 Technical Work Group#2 Technical Work Group and Stakeholder Workshop#1 Online Open House and Community Roundtables community stakeholders. Q• , I O III , iin = %_ SUMMER FALL EARLY WINTER LATE WINTER Project Kickoff Best Practices Goals&Vision Needs Identification V j ' 1i i ltLie k l!4: 11► & lilt Public Comment Technical Work Group#5 Technical Work Group#4 Technical Work Group#3 Stakeholder Workshop#3 Stakeholder Workshop#2 Note: ® (a) c 0 2022 2023 WINTER FALL SUMMER SPRING 2024 Final Vision Draft Vision Evaluation Draft Recommendations o �o I I I q WASHINGTON COUNTY k Cab c) `i TRANSIT STUDY 4 WHAT DID WE LEARN FROM THE COMMUNITY? We engaged with the community in several ways: • Four virtual community Roundtable Discussions to discuss transit needs and barriers with affordable housing partners, employers, and people with 43% of survey respondents • said that stops that are not disabilities and older adults. close enough to their homes, • In-person engagement through our Community Engagement Liaisons that work, or other destinations is a reached over 300 people. significant barrier to using public 0 • An online open house and survey that received nearly 500 responses. transportation more frequently. Community members told us about the challenges they face taking transit in Washington County today: • Service isn't always conveniently close enough to where people live or Many stops are not accessible where they need to go. for riders with disabilities. • People feel unsafe waiting for and riding transit. • Some bus shelters are poorly lit, unsanitary, or damaged. We need more covered stops • Some stops are not ADA accessible and sidewalk gaps and lack of safe and more stops with time crossings make it challenging to access transit. displays. • Transit service is lacking early in the morning and later in the evening. • Taking transit isn't convenient - it often takes longer than driving. Lack of pedestrian infrastructure makes it dangerous to walk to n 9 of, IP vi r t 3 the bus stop. IL ) 11 I , . I1liirnri 5 Washington County Transit Vision OUR GOALS Five goals guide the Transit Vision. "1 'Jt all — 41111111111. ice. mm. • • Equity Environmental Health Improve access to Reduce greenhouse gas opportunities with more emissions and improve equitable and affordable environmental health. options for transit. i■i cot 400 ►rak Economic Vitality Customer Ex•erience Partnerships Better connect people and Make transit easier to use. Support a transit system in Washington places to transit. County that will be successful long-term. o I q WASHINGTON COUNTY ACab o� `i TRANSIT STUDY 6 WHAT IS THE TRANSIT VISION? The Vision for transit is to provide frequent, reliable transit service to more people throughout the county. It also identifies areas to improve connections at key mobility hubs and identifies the need to improve sidewalk connectivity near transit. The map below illustrates where frequent transit and shuttles will be prioritized in the next 20 years. Figure 1 Service Vision To Seaside&Astoria Future Connection to North Portland and Clark County Service Vision Vancouve Banks....... North To Tillamook Plain. Frequent Service Vision Existing/Funded Near-Term Ever.reen ',,c‘!Mill Mid-to Longer-Term CornellPortland Shuttle Service Vision GFrove Cornelius Hillsboro �° iiiMn Existing/Funded .ii Bar .��� Near Term r�y,,,y A ^ r '�� Mid-to Longer-Term lo'_ . -- :dale Hw Shuttle service zones are conceptual and would be refined prior to implementation .—e'' ' 'll Hart -�, Future Connection Gaston Future Connection yap betounnSndHWashioAre �i f County and Hillsboro Area Az Tigard ,i Other Transit Services stenos Connections to Ferry = South MAX Light Rail(within county) To Yamhill County Clackamasand C uties Regional HCT(out-of-county) Local Service(within county) G;6'6r • Regional Connection Tualatin Sherwood sherw°°. To Oregon City Schematic map illustrating priority investments. Does not show all existing services or routing / details. To Yamhill County I/ I N 111111 To Wilsonville/Salem o 5 Miles O 7 Washington County Transit Vision The map below illustrates where high capacity transit and intersection improvements will be prioritized in the county to improve transit reliability. See Recommendation 4 for the type of improvements that could be implemented. Figure 2 Capital Investment Priorities Capital Investment Vancouver Priorities Banks North Plains Transit Priority Investments Hillsboro-Sunset Planned Regional HCT Corridor yand/or nd/orTransit Poortlartlannd ———- Potential HOT Extensions Forest Grove- I-v J • to Existing or Planned HCT Corridors Hillsboro Evergreen] j E (LRT Extension) Portland Central City Priority Transit Corridor Existingor Planned ornell c� MAX Tunnel - i • co Frequent Service Corridors Forest Cornelius Hillsboro• • • ` f `rnP/` Barn Top 10 High Priority Grove • . F' a°� • c"z,•� Speed&Reliability TV Highway 'c Alo la �>, Intersections U eaverton Beaverton-Portland Bethany-Beaverton (via Beaverton Hillsdale Hwy) - (via Farmington/185th) o Hart ale GastonFi Beaverton 04 III Southwest _____________________ Corridor 41 Scholls Tigard Ferry = i Sherwood-Tigard King (via Pacific Hwy) City It Tualatin f l ••Sherwood Tualatin Sherwood i To Clackamas County Schematic map illustrating priority investments. i Does not show all existing services or routing details. II I I 0 * ToWilsonville/Salem 0 5 Miles o �o I I I I q WASHINGTON COUNTY . CWb c o3 `i TRANSIT STUDY 8 RECOMMENDATIONS TO ACHIEVE THE TRANSIT VISION Our recommendations provide the guiding framework for implementation to improve transit over the next 20 years. They help focus Washington County and its jurisdictional partners and define clear roles and responsibilities to improve the transit offerings and experience in the county. 4 Prepare Priority Transit Corridors for High Capacity Transit (HCT) Local jurisdictions seek to plan for and implement a transit supportive environment along priority corridors that encourages current and future transit ridership while meeting regional objectives around equity and affordability. Priority HCT corridors include the following: • Beaverton-Forest Grove RapidBus via TV Hwy - Line 57 • Tualatin-Portland - Southwest Corridor LRT • Beaverton-Bethany via Farmington/185th - Line 52 • Sunset TC-Hillsboro HCT via US 26/Evergreen • Beaverton-Tigard-Tualatin-Oregon City HCT - Line 76 • Sherwood Tigard HCT via Hwy 99W • Beaverton-Wilsonville in vicinity of WES (with 15 minute headways all-day) 9 Washington County Transit Vision 0 Advocate to Build Out the Frequent Service Grid Washington County and its partners seek to build out the frequent service grid over the next twenty years. See Figure 1 above for a map showing the frequent service vision. The table below shows existing, funded, and recommended frequent service priorities. Figure 3 Frequent Service Route Recommendations by Time Period Existing Near-Term Near-Term Mid- to Longer- (Funded) (Priority) Term Body 12 Barbur/Sandy Blvd 12 Barbur/Sandy Blvd 56 Scholls Ferry/ 56 with extension* with Tualatin Extension Marquam Hill 20 Burnside/Stark 67 Bethany/158th 48 Cornell* 62 Murray Blvd 54 Beaverton-Hillsdale Hwy 78 Denney/Kerr Pkwy 52 Farmington/185th 94 Pacific Hwy 57 TV Hwy/Forest Grove 97 Tualatin-Sherwood Rd 115-Intel with Jones Farm 113 Cornelius Pass 76 Beaverton -Tualatin (765L) Extension* Notes:*48: Upgrade in December 2023. 56: Future extension as far west as Tile Flat Road. 115: Initial implementation planned to be frequent during peak periods. Increasing Access to Frequent Transit • Today,just under 20% of Washington County residents live within a 1/2 mile walk of frequent service, based on 2020 population data. • Implementing frequent service on these corridors would put over 50%of residents within a 1/2 mile walk of frequent service, based on 2040 population projections. 0 o WASHINGTON COUNTY * Cab TRANSIT STUDY 10 0 Implement Additional Shuttle Service Shuttles and frequent circulators are effective service models in areas where fixed-route service is less feasible and increases the reach of the transit system in Washington County. The Transit Vision builds on the successful partnerships between Washington County, TriMet, and Ride Connection to expand this model to additional service areas. See Figure 1 above for a map of the shuttle vision. Different shuttle models can serve the varied needs of our communities. 1. On-Demand Ride Services in Low-Density Residential 2. Employer-Oriented Service: Employers beyond the Areas: Some neighborhoods in the county lack sufficient density reach of transit in employment areas can fund a shared or demand to make it cost-effective to provide frequent service shuttle service from transit centers to help retain and attract and/or local service but still have important transit needs. On- employees. Partnerships across multiple employers can be demand or deviated-route services can provide cost-effective particularly cost-effective. shared ride service in these areas. They can also help connect people to frequent rail or bus service, including outside of local business partnered with TriMet transit operating hours. Using shared ride shuttles to provide to provide shuttle services from the these connections reduces traffic, is better for air quality, and MAX station to my workplace. Th reduces demand for spaces in park-and-ride lots. bus didn't come very often befor The Ride Connection ;ArtN.r� shuttle helps me 1 d ops off; travel to the MAX employee station woyeerk station so I can take ! the train to Hillsboro. Walk to MAX • CO 20 3 © � Ride MAX to • Catchemployee Transit Statin s,,wwwonnr��khuttle410. to .•o o. P* IOWA = ° 11 Washington County Transit Vision 4 Implement Speed and Reliability Improvements In order for people to rely on transit for their everyday trips - getting to work and school, running errands, and picking up kids from childcare - bus travel times need to be fast and reliable. Local jurisdictions with road and signal authority play an important role in making improvements on streets that can help buses run faster and more reliably. Small improvements along a bus route can help riders save time. ■=i g_ia_-__ Transit Signal Priority Bus-Only Lanes are Transit Signal Priority extends the0L.— dedicated or exclusive green time at a traffic signal so J lanes just for buses. With that my bus can get through an - r s - 4.1 a dedicated lane, my bus 1 intersection. ,, MO in s doesn't get stuck in traffic. _ ii+}} - - lm Fewer stops In-Lane Bus Stops Fewer stops help buses go In-Lane Bus Stops keep buses J faster and improve reliability. from having to merge back into Even if my closest bus stop ~4 0♦ traffic after stopping, on lower- L is removed and I have to111 i speed roadways (e.g., posted walk a bit further to catch speed of 35 mph or lower). This 4., • I. the bus, the bus saves ■ up 1 Nadia saves my bus time and gets me _ _ • ., - 4 times because it doesn't to my destination faster. 4. • -I have to stop as often. Walk to Walk to old new bus stop bus stop ) I o �o ( iii 'l WASHINGTON COUNTY g 6%, o� `i TRANSIT STUDY 12 0 Improve Amenities and Connections at Stops and Stations Local jurisdictions seek to leverage local development and capital projects to coordinate on transit stop improvements so all stops and stations are accessible, safe, and welcoming. The Transit Vision also recommends the concept of a mobility hub, which connects transit riders to nearby neighborhoods and land uses through safe bicycle and pedestrian amenities, as well as other sustainable modes of transportation. Mobility hubs help riders make seamless connections across the region. 11141" 1° l� s , r ' II4111L c 0 `_/ ,c , [ 1- rfK 4". 1 i IV n , - to,L-4rJ -,. tlt i . .411:-!,‘ '71-, 0 - °I. • --, IS n , �� � r 11 ��, I� �I 111.14 ' 4 ., Ilk:: 4311,,i, cle3e;...-c,,ei,,,,1 Vair ` ., % , ` 1. ?a4r'' / .c '�� / AIL 13 Washington County Transit Vision aImprove Bike and Pedestrian Access to Transit The jurisdictions across Washington County play an important role in designing and operating the network that connects people to transit. Bicycle and pedestrian access improvements can be prioritized to help connect people to HCT and frequent service corridors as well as high- need areas to support those who depend on transit. Enhance access to transit by slowing down traffic, improving crossings, and filling in missing sidewalks. All transit trips begin and end with a pedestrian trip. Safe and comfortable sidewalks and pedestrian conditions determine if transit riders take transit at all. The pedestrian realm should include well-lit and ADA-accessible sidewalks buffered from the roadway and well-marked crossings at frequent intervals to improve the safety and experience of everyone, especially older adults and those using mobility devices. Local jurisdictions can implement the following strategies to improve safe access to transit: Provide well-marked intersections andInstall pedestrian-scale lighting near transit stops so enhanced mid-block crossings to safely = riders can see and be seen to improve perceived and cross the street and reduce walking time to actual safety and comfort. transit stops. III Install traffic calming measures such as 11111 curb extensions and median refuge islands Implement wayfinding along the transit network to help ■ to reduce crossing distances, vehicle speeds, riders connect to key destinations from transit. and number of travel lanes. Implement exclusive pedestrian phases Ensure the built environment design follows Designing for 111 to allow pedestrians to cross the street inDisability (also known as universal or inclusive design) both directions at the same time. A leading principles so all ages and abilities can ride transit. Principles pedestrian interval (LPI) gives pedestrians include wide sidewalks with curb ramps that are not impeded a 3-7 second head start when entering the by poles or other elements, mild driveway cross-slopes, tactile intersection. treatments on curb ramps, stop platforms, and other conflict points, information in audio, visual, and tactile formats, and information. ora' WASHINGTON COUNTY k dvb o� I...' TRANSIT STUDY 14 0 Implement Transit Supportive Programs and Policies Transit supportive programs and policies increase the attractiveness and awareness of transit options and help our communities leverage the investments made in our transit system. The important connection between land use and transit. Attractive and convenient transit service is not just about how often the bus arrives and where it goes; it also depends on the attractiveness of the street, the density and mix of land uses, and a connected street network and safe and convenient crossings that allow bicyclists and pedestrians to easily and safely access transit service. Local jurisdictions play a critical role in designing their streets and focusing development in areas that are or can be well-served by transit. What can Washington County and its partners do to design Community Support for transit-supportive communities? Safe, Climate-friendly Transportation • Concentrate and intensify residential housing, jobs, and services near frequent transit. Land Use Transportation • Align major destinations along reasonably direct corridors Policies Policies served by frequent transit. ,19, • Provide a rich mix of uses that support street-level activity If throughout the day and night. NCompact Connected Mixed-use Transportation • Support transit access by providing safe and convenient Development Network crossings. tit • Shorten the distance between transit stops and destinations by adding missing sidewalk connections and interconnecting Easy to walk, bike, roll, streets in a grid pattern. scoot,and take transit 15 Washington County Transit Vision 8 Build Partnerships to Enhance Service Coordination and Funding To implement the recommendations in the Transit Vision, strong partnerships with transit providers, jurisdictions, Washington County, and private partners are needed. More - or redirected funding - will also be needed to enhance service and the supportive elements that improve the transit experience. Opportunities to influence state-level decision-making. Statewide dialogue around funding to improve transit and reduce vehicle congestion presents unique opportunities for Washington County and cities to realize the Transit Vision. • 2025 Legislative Session - Advocate for reallocating the way that federal and state funds for transit and transportation are spent. The current interpretation of the Oregon Constitution mandates that highway funds be spent only on the roadway, essentially eliminating funding for multimodal investments. Transportation Benefit - Federal funding sources may be more flexible and could be allocated to fund transit improvements District (Seattle, WA) across the state. These dollars are regulated and allocated at the state level, which allows for The City of Seattle voted advocacy to influence how these funds are spent. on a Transportation Benefit • Tolling revenue District (TBD) in 2014 to - Advocate for an approach to tolling that helps Washington County achieve its transit goals. This impose a 0.1% sales tax means advocating for future toll revenue to support investments in better transit, walking, and biking increase and an additional infrastructure. $60 annual vehicle license fee, generating more than • Innovative Mobility Program (IMP) $45 million annually for - Oregon Department of Transportation s Innovative Mobility Program allocates $20M in Infrastructure, the expansion of transit Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) funds to improve access to public transportation, reduce the number service and low-income of trips Oregonians make by car, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions particularly for historically transportation equity. excluded groups. Grant applications will be available until 2027. Counties, cities, and transit agencies are eligible recipients. o WASHINGTON COUNTY dvb , TRANSIT STUDY 16 WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF THE TRANSIT VISION? The Transit Vision will improve access to frequent service to/from where people live and employment centers, along with the travel time and reliability of transit service. • Currently, nearly 20% of the population (2020) has access to frequent service. With the Vision, this number would increase to over 50% of future population (2040). • Currently, nearly 30% of jobs (2020) are within a 1/2 mile walk of frequent service. With the Vision, this number would increase to nearly 70% of future jobs (2040). • Currently, slightly over 40% of major employers are within a 1/2 mile walk of frequent service. With the Vision, this number would increase to nearly 90% of major employers.2 V The Transit Vision will also improve access to frequent service for people living in 111 equity priority areas defined by Metro and TriMet. 4111 • Currently, slightly over 20% of the population (2020) within Metro Equity Focus 1 1 1 Areas (EFAs) has access to frequent service. With the Vision, this number would A FFICE STORE increase to over 60% of future population. • Currently, over 45% of the population (2020) within TriMet equity focus areas • (Census block groups in the top quartile of TriMet Equity Index) has access to frequent service. With the Vision, this number would increase to nearly 85% of 1111100 future population. 2 Considered to be employers subject to State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) Employee Commute Options (ECO) rules. Employers in the Portland area with more than 100 employees at a single work site must provide their employees with commute options to encourage them to reduce auto trips to the work site. 17 Washington County Transit Vision HOW WILL WE MEASURE SUCCESS? The goals of the plan are to increase the number of people who ride transit and reduce per capita vehicle miles traveled to address climate change. The metrics below will be tracked by the County to evaluate progress towards the Transit Vision goals. 9 • • • 1;11, ■s■ , , I 1 Mr , _9_, 1 Reduction in VMT Transit Ridership per Capita Transit Mode Share Ridership at stop/stations VMT within Washington County Share of Commute Trips using Metric within Washington County Y divided by population Transit as Primary Mode Existing Value 30,866 8,621 VMT per capita per year 2.5% Time Period Fall 2022 2022 2022 Data Source TriMet1 Washington County2 American Community Survey3 Annually (based on the Annual Annual How Often Fall service period) Sources: 1.TriMet. 2. Washington County. https://www.washingtoncountyor.gov/support-services/documents/washington-county- trip-reduction-plan/.3. US Census Bureau,American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates,2022.Table B08141. o Al t q WASHINGTON COUNTY Cab o� `i TRANSIT STUDY 18 AIS-5446 8. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/27/2024 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: PUBLIC FACILITY PROPERTY ACQUISITION Authored By: Steve Rymer Presented By: City Manager Steve Rymer Item Type: Motion Requested Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The City of Tigard has been working to address its failing public facilities for many years. The buildings for Public Works,Police Department,Permit Center, City Hall, and our Emergency Operations Center have functional limitations and are seismically unsafe, overcrowded, and too costly to maintain for taxpayers. To address this longstanding need for modern, resilient, and cost-effective public facilities, the City Council included "acquire land for safe and modern public facilities"in its Adopted 2023-25 Goals. Funds for this purchase were also then included in the City's adopted Capital Improvement Program which do not include any General Fund dollars. After years of study,the City is pursuing a solution: Investing in a property on Wall Street that could accommodate new City of Tigard public facilities,including potentially both Public Works and the Police Department. Over the coming months, the City will conduct a detailed due diligence process to ensure this property is the best investment for Tigard prior to finalizing a purchase and sale agreement which is attached. As our community grows, acquiring this property would allow the City of Tigard to serve the public more safely and to use taxpayer dollars more efficiently. ACTION REQUESTED 1. Ratify the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated February 13, 2024, and approve the property acquisition of approximately 9.5 acres located at 13045 and 13225 Southwest Wall Street for$13,950,848, contingent on satisfaction of the conditions as determined by the City Attorney and City Manager. 2. Approve the payment of$1,164,268.33 to the United States Economic Development Agency as full satisfaction of repayment for the federal share of funding to improve Wall Street and for the release of the Property Management Agreement. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Through this recommended property acquisition, the City of Tigard is taking steps to better serve our growing community, today and in the future,with modern,resilient public facilities. For years,Tigard has faced a serious challenge: facilities are aging, seismically unsafe, overcrowded, and too costly to Tigard taxpayers to rehabilitate. This includes buildings for Public Works,Police, Permit Center, City Hall, and our Emergency Operations Center. They all have significant functional limitations and are costly to maintain. The current Public Works building,which initially housed the Tigard Water District,is 30 years old. The existing Public Works site is approximately three acres and recent studies concluded Public Works required a minimum of eight acres to serve our growing community. Starting in 2006, and continuing in more recent studies, there is a clearly defined need for a new Public Works Facility and Yard. The current offices are poorly ventilated and inadequately sized for the City's team,resulting in the need to house some teammates in leased space off-site. More meeting space is needed so that operations and maintenance teammates do not have to conduct meetings outside. A storage warehouse is required to protect expensive tools, equipment, and parts and materials from the weather. A new fleet maintenance facility is also needed to serve the Public Works' construction equipment and the Police Department's vehicles. Finally, a yard with adequate bulk storage is needed. The need for a modern, resilient Police facility has been recognized by the City for many years. The Police Department currently has space in three different buildings that total 15,728 square feet. In 1992, modular structures were added behind the current facility as a temporary bridge until a new facility could be constructed. In 2013, a study was commissioned to assess the needs of the Police Department and create a framework for future design and construction decisions. In 2020, the most current needs assessment was completed. It assumed that a facility would come online in 2024 and allowed for 20-year growth, to meet the needs of a growing community. The study recommended a police facility of 49,654 square feet and total site square footage of 74,680. The City has been looking for property to relocate essential City operations since 2019.Those efforts have been unsuccessful to date.The previous Council provided clear direction to find a property where a mutually acceptable, traditional purchase and sale agreement arrangement can be achieved. After much deliberation and several rounds of negotiation,we have reached a deal, conditioned on City Council approval, and successfully completing our due diligence actions. Between now and April 30, 2024, our due diligence actions would include the following: •A concept site plan,including preliminary architectural and civil engineering review, to evaluate the ability of the property to accommodate a joint Tigard Police Department-Public Works Department facility, or a facility focused on serving the Public Works Department. •A topographic survey. •An Environmental Site Assessment. •A geotechnical review. If the Council approves this recommended purchase, the City will not complete any potential transaction until the due diligence process is satisfactorily complete as determined by the City Attorney and City Manager who have both been closely involved in negotiations. Furthermore, the City received approximately$7M of grant funds to improve Wall Street by connecting Hunziker Road to Tech Center Drive. $1.6M of these were from the United States Economic Development Agency (EDA) for Phase 1 design and construction. This EDA grant resulted in a covenant on the entire Wall Street property (the parcels of interest to the City as well as the northern section) because of the commitment to deliver industrial jobs here as a result of this federal investment. Since the time of the Wall Street improvement, the City has initiated numerous activities to promote and market this site for industrial use.When the property changed owners a few years ago, the covenant was included. Neither the current landowner nor the City have been successful attracting industrial land development to this site. The City team have worked with the EDA to determine how 9.5 acres of the Wall Street property could be used for much needed public facilities since the availability of approximately 10 acres to construct new public facilities is very limited.We agreed that the City would need to make a payment of$1,164,268.33 to the United States Economic Development Agency as full satisfaction of repayment for the federal share of funding to improve Wall Street and for the release of the Property Management Agreement. That said, the City will continue working with the landowner to support jobs on the northern section of the property fronting Hunziker Road that would be adjacent to the 9.5 acres the City would purchase. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The Council could choose not to purchase the property or provide additonal direction. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Fiscal Impact Fiscal Information: The adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes $15,250,000 in Project 91029 for the purchase of land to accommodate new, resilient City facilities. The project is funded from the Water Fund ($11,750,000),Public Works Engineering Fund ($2,500,000), and Sanitary Sewer Fund ($1,000,000). It is important to note that these restricted funds cannot be used to support General Fund operations and no General Fund dollars will be spent for this purchase. Attachments Purchase and Sale Agreement Wall Property Map DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT This PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT(this"Agreement")dated February 12, 2024,for reference purposes only, shall be effective on the date when this Agreement has been executed and delivered by Seller and Buyer(the"Execution Date"): BETWEEN: Wall Street South LLC and Wall Street Central LLC (jointly and severally"Seller") Address: P.O. Box 15523, Seattle,WA 98155, Attn: Jack Martin E-Mail: Jackmartinis©protonmail.com AND: City of Tigard ("Buyer") Address: 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard OR 97223,Attn: Steve Rymer E-Mail: stever@tigard-or.gov and shelbyr@tigard-or.gov 1. Purchase and Sale. 1.1 Generally. In accordance with this Agreement, Buyer agrees to buy and acquire from Seller, and Seller agrees to sell to Buyer the following,all of which are collectively referred to in this Agreement as the`Property:" (a)the real property and all improvements thereon generally described or located at 13045 and 13225 SW Wall Street, in Tigard, Oregon, comprising approximately 9.5 acres of land and legally described on Exhibit A (the "Real Estate")), including all of Seller's right, title and interest in and to all fixtures, appurtenances, and easements thereon or related thereto. 1.2 Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property shall be Thirteen Million Nine Hundred Fifty Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Nine Dollars ($13,950,849) (the "Purchase Price"). The Purchase Price shall be paid to Seller in cash at Closing (as defined in Section 7.1 below). As additional consideration for Seller's conveyance of the Property to Buyer,if Closing occurs,Buyer agrees to transfer,at Closing,to Seller's affiliate Wall Street North LLC ("Seller's Affiliate") $238,061.26 of the outstanding TDT credits that Seller/Seller's Affiliate purchased from Trammell Crow for the benefit of property known as tax parcel 2S101CA00800 ("Tax Lot 800"),the TDT credits existing for TL 800 will remain in place for the benefit of TL 800 for a total of$396,685. If Seller's Affiliate desires to develop Tax Lot 800 and a pedestrian pathway is required in connection therewith, such path shall be placed solely on the Buyer's Property, 2S101CA00100(Tax Lot 100), immediately south of the shared property line between the Buyer's property and Tax Lot 800.Upon Closing,Seller agrees to relocate, at Seller's sole cost and expense, the curb cut/physical access point to Wall Street, from its current location on the border of the Buyer's Property and Tax Lot 800 such that the curb cut/physical access point to Wall Street is located entirely on Tax Lot 800,which Seller agrees to complete within six(6)months after issuance of permit.This obligation to relocate the driveway shall run with the land on TL 800 and be binding on Seller's Affiliate and any successors and assigns. At any time after Closing if a path is required, Buyer agrees to construct a six foot high fence at Buyer's expense spanning the entire property line between the Property and Tax Lot 800. 1.2.1 Earnest Money Deposit. (a) Within three (11 business days of the Execution Date, Buyer shall deliver into Escrow (as defined herein)the sum of$250,000 in cash as earnest money(the"Earnest Money"). (b) The purchase and sale of the Property shall be accomplished through an escrow(the "Escrow")that Seller has established or will establish with WFG National Title,Attn: Trevor Cheyne,Escrow Officer (tcheyne@wfgtitle.com) (the "Escrow Holder") within one (1) business day after the Execution Date. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement: (i) any interest earned on the Earnest Money shall be considered to be part of the Earnest Money; and (iii)the Earnest Money shall be applied to the Purchase Price at Closing. ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 1 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 1.2.2 Balance of Purchase Price. Buyer shall pay the balance of the Purchase Price in cash at Closing. 2. Conditions to Purchase. 2.1 Buyer's obligation to purchase the Property is conditioned on the following: 2.1.1 Prior to 11:59 p.m.on April 30, 2024 (the"Inspection Contingency Period"), Buyer's approval of the results of(collectively, the "General Conditions"): (a) the Property inspection described in Section 3 below;and (b)the document review described in Section 4 below. 2.1.2 Approval of the acquisition by the Tigard City Council prior to April 30,2024. The General Conditions,and any other conditions in Section 2.1 above shall be collectively defined as the"Conditions." 2.2 If,for any reason in Buyer's sole discretion, Buyer has not timely given written waiver of the Conditions,or stated in writing that such Conditions have been satisfied,by notice given to Seller within the time periods for such Conditions set forth above, this Agreement shall be deemed automatically terminated, the Earnest Money shall be promptly returned to Buyer,and thereafter,except as specifically provided to the contrary herein, neither party shall have any further obligation, right or remedy hereunder. 3. Property Inspection. Seller shall permit Buyer and its agents, at Buyer's sole expense and risk, to enter the Property at reasonable times after not less than twenty-four(24) hours' prior notice to Seller and after prior notice by Seller to conduct any and all inspections, tests, and surveys concerning the structural condition of the improvements,all mechanical,electrical and plumbing systems, hazardous materials, pest infestation, soils conditions, wetlands, Americans with Disabilities Act compliance,zoning, and all other matters affecting the suitability of the Property for Buyer's intended use and/or otherwise reasonably related to the purchase of the Property including the economic feasibility of such purchase. If the transaction contemplated in this Agreement fails to close for any reason (or no reason) as a result of the act or omission of Buyer or its agents, Buyer shall promptly restore the Property to substantially the condition the Property was in prior to Buyer's performance of any inspections or work. To the extent permitted by the Oregon Tort Claims Act, Buyer shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Seller from all liens, liability, damages, costs, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and experts' fees, for damage to property or injury to persons caused by Buyer's or its agents', contractors' or consultants'entry on and inspection of the Property. This agreement to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Seller shall survive Closing or any termination of this Agreement. If Buyer elects to resurvey the Property, such resurvey shall be at Buyer's sole expense. 4. Seller's Documents. Within 5 days after the Execution Date,Seller shall deliver,physically or electronically, to Buyer or Buyer's designee, legible and complete copies of the following documents, including without limitation, a list of the Personal Property, and other items relating to the ownership, operation, and maintenance of the Property to the extent now in existence and to the extent such items are or come within Seller's possession or control, including, without limitation, surveys (including without limitation ALTA, boundary and topographical), building and site plans (including'as-built' plans),environmental reports, leases,geotechnical analyses or reports,service contracts, rent roll, operating statements for the previous two years and current year-to-date, governmental notices. 5. Title Insurance. The parties acknowledge receipt of the Preliminary Title Report dated January 16, 2024 (the "Title Report") prepared by WFG National Title (the"Title Company"), under order no. 24-103325, showing the status of Seller's title to the Property. Exceptions 6 through 8 of the Title Report are deemed "Permitted Exceptions," and Seller shall cause the removal of exceptions 9 and 10 of the Title Report prior to or at Closing. In the event that the Title Company issues an updated Title Report (the "Updated Report") with additional exceptions ("Exceptions"), Buyer shall have until ten (10) business days after receipt thereof to give notice in writing to Seller of any objection to ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 2 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 such Exceptions. Within five (5) business days after receipt of such notice from Buyer, Seller shall give Buyer written notice of whether it is willing and able to remove the objected-to Exceptions, and Buyer shall elect whether to: (i) purchase the Property subject to those objected-to Exceptions which Seller is not willing or able to remove; or (ii) terminate this Agreement. Without the need for objection by Buyer, Seller shall,with respect to liens and encumbrances that can be satisfied and released by the payment of money, eliminate such exceptions to title on or before Closing. On or before the Closing Date (defined below), Seller shall remove all Exceptions to which Buyer objected and which Seller agreed, or is deemed to have agreed, to remove. All remaining Exceptions set forth in the Updated Report and those Exceptions caused by or agreed to by Buyer shall be deemed"Permitted Exceptions." 6. Default; Remedies. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, in the event Buyer fails to deposit the Earnest Money in Escrow strictly as and when contemplated under Section 1.2.1 above, Seller shall have the right at any time thereafter, but prior to Buyer's deposit of the Earnest Money in Escrow, to terminate this Agreement and all further rights and obligations hereunder by giving written notice thereof to Buyer. If the conditions, if any, to Buyer's obligation to close this transaction are satisfied or waived by Buyer and Buyer fails, through no fault of Seller, to close on the purchase of the Property, Seller's sole remedy shall be to retain the Earnest Money paid by Buyer as liquidated damages. If the conditions, if any,to Seller's obligation to close this transaction are satisfied or waived by Seller and Seller fails,through no fault of Buyer,to close the sale of the Property, Buyer shall be entitled as its sole and exclusive remedy to either: (i)terminate this Agreement, receive a refund of the Earnest Money, and be reimbursed for Buyer's out-of-pocket costs related to this transaction; or (ii) to pursue the remedy of specific performance. If Buyer has not filed an action for specific performance within sixty(60)days after the scheduled Closing Date, Buyer shall be deemed to have elected remedy (i) above. In no event shall either party be entitled to punitive or consequential damages, if any, resulting from the other party's failure to close the sale of the Property. BUYER AND SELLER EACH AGREE THAT IF BUYER DEFAULTS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, THE DAMAGES TO SELLER WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT AND IMPRACTICABLE TO ASCERTAIN, AND THAT THEREFORE, IF BUYER DEFAULTS HEREUNDER THE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AMOUNT SHALL SERVE AS DAMAGES FOR THE DEFAULT BY BUYER, AS A REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF THE DAMAGES TO SELLER, INCLUDING COSTS OF NEGOTIATING AND DRAFTING THIS AGREEMENT, COSTS OF COOPERATING IN SATISFYING CONDITIONS TO CLOSING, COSTS OF SEEKING ANOTHER BUYER, OPPORTUNITY COSTS IN KEEPING THE PROPERTY OUT OF THE MARKETPLACE, AND OTHER COSTS INCURRED IN CONNECTION HEREWITH. 7. Closing of Sale. 7.1 Buyer and Seller agree the sale of the Property shall be closed ("Closing"), in Escrow, on or before thirty(30) days after the General Conditions set forth in Section 2.1.1.have been satisfied or waived in writing by Buyer(the"Closing Date"). The sale of the Property shall be deemed closed when the document(s)conveying title to the Property is/are delivered and recorded and the Purchase Price is disbursed to Seller. Not less than two (2) business days prior to the Closing Date, the parties shall request that the Title Company obtain a tax certificate to comply with ORS 311.411,and Seller shall ensure that all real property taxes are paid to enable such tax certificate to be issued. 7.2 At Closing, Buyer and Seller shall deposit with the Escrow Holder all documents and funds required to close the transaction in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. At Closing, Seller shall deliver a certification confirming that it is not a"foreign person"as such term is defined by applicable law and regulations. 7.3 At Closing, Seller shall convey fee simple title to the Property to Buyer by statutory warranty deed (the"Deed"). At Closing,Seller shall cause the Title Company to deliver to Buyer a standard ALTA form owner's policy of title insurance(the"Title Policy")in the amount of the Purchase Price insuring fee simple title to the Property in Buyer subject only to the Permitted Exceptions and the standard preprinted exceptions contained in the Title Policy. Seller shall reasonably cooperate in the issuance to Buyer of an ALTA extended form policy of title insurance and sign all customary title affidavits required in connection therewith. Buyer shall pay any additional expense resulting from the ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 3 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 ALTA extended coverage and any endorsements required by Buyer.The Title Company's irrevocable commitment to issue the Title Policy to Buyer shall be a condition precedent to Buyer's obligations under this Agreement. 8. Closing Costs; Prorations. Seller shall pay the premium for the Title Policy, provided, however, if Buyer elects to obtain an ALTA extended form policy of title insurance and/or any endorsements, Buyer shall pay the difference in the premium relating to such election. Seller and Buyer shall each pay one-half(1/2) of the escrow fees charged by the Escrow Holder. Any excise tax and/or transfer tax shall be split equally between Seller and Buyer. Real property taxes for the tax year of the Closing shall be prorated as of the Closing Date. Seller shall use reasonable efforts to cause any applicable utility meters to be read on the day prior to the Closing Date,and will be responsible for the cost of any utilities used prior to the Closing Date. Seller shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, interest,and penalties, if any, upon removal of the Property from any special assessment or program. If any of the aforesaid prorations cannot be definitely calculated on the Closing Date, then they shall be estimated at Closing and definitely calculated as soon after the Closing Date as feasible. 9. Possession. Seller shall deliver exclusive possession of the Property,subject to the Permitted Exceptions, to Buyer on the Closing Date. 10. Condition of Property. Seller represents and warrants to Buyer, effective as of the Execution Date and as of the Closing Date: 10.1 Seller has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and complete the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 10.2 The Property will be in the same condition as its present condition on the Closing Date. 10.3 Seller has received no written notice of any liens or other assessments to be assessed against the Property or any notices relating to condemnation. 10.4 Seller is not aware of any material defects relative to the Property. 10.5 Seller has received no written notice from any governmental agency of any violation or potential violation of any statute, law, ordinance, or deed restriction, rule, or regulation with respect to the Property (including without limitation any environmental law or building code violation) and is not aware of any potential violation of the same. 10.6 No actions, suits or proceedings have been instituted or threatened against Seller or affecting the Property at law or in equity or before any federal, state or municipal governmental department, commission, board, bureau,agency or instrumentality thereof. 10.7 Seller is not a "foreign person" as that term is defined in Internal Revenue Code §1445. On the Closing Date, Seller shall execute and deliver to Buyer a certification of non-foreign status on a form required by the Internal Revenue Service. 10.8 To Seller's knowledge and except as disclosed in writing to Buyer, (a)the Property has never been used for the storage or disposal of any hazardous material or waste, (b) there are no environmentally hazardous materials or wastes or tanks contained on or under the Property, and (c)the Property has not been identified by any governmental agency as a site upon which environmentally hazardous materials or wastes have been or may have been located or deposited. 10.9 There are no leases, occupancies, easements, first rights of refusal, options or other rights to purchase or use the Property or obligations or agreements that would be binding on Buyer after Closing relative to the Property. Unless caused by Buyer,Seller shall bear all risk of loss and damage to the Property until Closing,and Buyer shall bear such risk at and after Closing. Except for Seller's representations and warranties set forth in this Section 10, Buyer shall acquire the Property"AS IS"with all faults and Buyer shall rely on the results of its own inspection and investigation in Buyer's acquisition of the Property. It shall be a condition of Buyer's Closing obligation that all of Seller's representations and warranties stated in this Agreement are materially true and correct on the Closing Date. Seller's representations and warranties stated in this Agreement shall survive Closing for one(1)year. ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 4 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 11. Condemnation or Casualty. If, prior to Closing, all or any material part of the Property is(a)condemned or appropriated by public authority or any party exercising the right of eminent domain, or is threatened thereby, or(b) if there occurs a fire or other casualty causing material damage to the Property or any material portion thereof,then,at the election of Buyer by written notice to Seller,either:(i)this Agreement shall terminate,whereupon all Earnest Money and any interest accrued thereon shall be promptly refunded to Buyer; or(ii)this Agreement shall remain in effect and Seller shall assign to Buyer at Closing Seller's entire right, title and interest in the taking award or casualty insurance proceeds attributable to the portion of the Property taken or destroyed,as the case may be. If Buyer fails to make such election within twenty(20)days after written notice from Seller, Buyer shall be deemed to have elected option(ii)above. Seller will promptly notify Buyer as to the commencement of any such action or any communication from a condemning authority that a condemnation or appropriation is contemplated, and will cooperate with Buyer in the response to or defense of such actions. 12. Operation of Property. Between the Execution Date and the Closing Date, Seller shall: (i) continue to operate, maintain and insure the Property consistent with Seller's current operating practices; and (iii) not, without Buyer's prior written consent, which consent may be withheld in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion, enter into: (a) any leases or occupancy agreements for the Property; (b) any amendments or modification agreements affecting the Property;or(c)any service contracts or other agreements affecting the Property that are not terminable prior to Closing. 13. Assignment. Neither party may assign its interest in this Agreement without the other party's prior written consent. 14. Arbitration. Intentionally deleted. 15. Attorneys' Fees. Intentionally deleted. 16. Statutory Notice. THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT MAY NOT BE WITHIN A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PROTECTING STRUCTURES.THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT, IN FARM OR FOREST ZONES, MAY NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR SITING OF A RESIDENCE AND THAT LIMIT LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 (Definitions for ORS 30.930 to 30.947), IN ALL ZONES. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSONS RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300 (Definitions for ORS 195.300 to 195.336), 195.301 (Legislative findings)AND 195.305 (Compensation for restriction of use of real property due to land use regulation)TO 195.336(Compensation and Conservation Fund)AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11,CHAPTER 424,OREGON LAWS 2007,SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17,CHAPTER 855,OREGON LAWS 2009,AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7,CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL,AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010(Definitions for ORS 92.010 to 92.192)OR 215.010(Definitions),TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL,TO VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF FIRE PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300 (Definitions for ORS 195.300 to 195.336), 195.301 (Legislative findings)AND 195.305 (Compensation for restriction of use of real property due to land use regulation)TO 195.336 (Compensation and Conservation Fund)AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009,AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. 17. Intentionally deleted. 18. Brokers. Seller agrees to pay a commission to Stu Peterson/Macadam Forbes ("Seller's Broker") at Closing pursuant to the terms of the agreement with Seller and Seller's Broker. In the event any claims for brokers' or ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 5 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 finders' fees or commissions are made in connection with the negotiation, execution, or consummation of this Agreement, then Seller shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Buyer from and against such claims if they are based upon any statement, representation or agreement made by Seller, and Buyer shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Seller if such claims shall be based on any statement, representation or agreement made by Buyer. 19. Notices. Unless otherwise specified, any notice required or permitted in, or related to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the party to be bound. Any notice will be deemed delivered: (a) when personally delivered; (b)when delivered by electronic mail transmission, with a copy sent by U.S. Mail; (c)on the day of delivery of the notice by reputable overnight courier;or(d)on the day of delivery of the notice by mailing by certified or registered U.S.mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, unless that day is a Saturday, Sunday,or federal or Oregon State legal holiday, in which event such notice will be deemed delivered on the next following business day. All notices shall be sent by the applicable party to the address of the other party shown at the beginning of this Agreement. 20. Miscellaneous. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. If the deadline under this Agreement for delivery of a notice or performance of any obligation is a Saturday, Sunday, or federal or Oregon State legal holiday, such deadline will be deemed extended to the next following business day. The facsimile and/or electronic mail transmission of any signed document including this Agreement shall be the same as delivery of an original,and digital signatures shall be valid and binding. At the request of either party,the party delivering a document by facsimile and/or electronic mail will confirm such transmission by signing and delivering to the other party a duplicate original document. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements between them. Without limiting the provisions of Section 13 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Buyer and Seller and their respective successors and assigns. Neither this Agreement nor a memorandum hereof shall be recorded unless the parties otherwise agree in writing. 21. Governing Law. This Agreement is made and executed under, and in all respects shall be governed and construed by, the laws of the State of Oregon. 22. Addenda; Exhibits. The following named addenda and exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated within this Agreement: Exhibit A—Legal Description of Property 23. OFAC Certification. The Federal Government, Executive Order 13224, requires that business persons of the United States not do business with any individual or entity on a list of"Specially Designated nationals and Blocked Persons"-that is,individuals and entities identified as terrorists or other types of criminals. Seller and Buyer hereinafter certify to each other that: 23.1 It is not acting, directly or indirectly, for or on behalf of any person, group, entity, or nation named by any Executive Order or the United States Treasury Department as a terrorist, specially designated national and/or blocked person, entity, nation, or transaction pursuant to any law, order, rule, or regulation that is enforced or administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control;and 23.2 It has not executed this Agreement, directly or indirectly on behalf of, or instigating or facilitating this Agreement,directly or indirectly on behalf of, any such person, group, entity, or nation. Seller and Buyer hereby agree to defend,indemnify,and hold harmless each other from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, risks, liabilities, and expenses (including attorney's fees and costs) arising from or related to any breach of the foregoing certification. This certification and agreement to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend shall survive Closing or any termination of this Agreement. ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 6 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY: Buyer City of Tigard By: s+tu, ,u Sieve Rymer, City Manager 2/12/2024 Date: Sell DWaJnStreet South LLC By: Name: regigin ri Title MGR Date:2/13/2024 Sel - DMisaiLeStEeet Central LLC Name: " Title MGR Date: 2/13/2024 ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 7 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY PARCEL I: A tract of land created pursuant to Property Line Adjustment Deed recorded August 13,2015, Recording No. 2015- 068819, located in the Southwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon, and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly Southwest corner of Lot 1 of"Tech Center Business Park", recorded in Book 53, page 29 of Washington County Plat Records, said point also being on the northeasterly right-of-way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad and being the most southerly corner of that property described as Parcel V in that Deed to Fred W. Fields as Trustee of the Fred W. Fields Revocable Living Trust, recorded on May 5, 2010, as Document Number 2010-033975,Washington County Deed Records;thence along said northeasterly right-of-way line, North 41°55'03"West 1113.55 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped "Northwest Surveying, Inc." and the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence leaving said northeasterly right-of-way line, North 29°34'10" East 713.78 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped "Northwest Surveying, Inc.";thence North 60°25'50" West 440.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped"Northwest Surveying, Inc."located on the easterly line of that property described as Parcel VI in said Document Number 2010-033975;thence along the easterly line of said Parcel VI, North 29°34'10" East 1055.76 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped "Northwest Surveying, Inc."located on the southerly right-of-way line of S.W. Hunziker Street(30 feet Southerly from the centerline thereof,when measured at right angles);thence along said southerly right-of-way line 16.24 feet along a non-tangent circular curve to the right, having a radius of 230.00 feet, a delta angle of 4°02'47", and a long chord bearing North 62°58'39"West 16.24 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod located at a point of tangency; thence continuing along said southerly right-of-way line, North 60°57'15"West 3.78 feet to the northwest corner of said Parcel VI; thence along the westerly line of said Parcel VI, South 29°34'10"West 1614.75 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod located on the northerly right-of-way line of said Southern Pacific Railroad; thence along said northerly right-of-way line, South 41°55'03" East 485.10 feet to the Point of Beginning.The basis of bearings for this description is survey number 32010,Washington County Survey Records. EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion described in Dedication Deed for road purposes recorded November 9, 2016, Recording No.2016-092473, Records of Washington County. TOGETHER WITH a slope easement as described in Slope Easement Agreement recorded July 31, 2017, Recording No. 2017-060597 and First Amendment Slope Easement Agreement recorded November 24, 2021, Recording No. 2021-122737, Records of Washington County. PARCEL II: A tract of land created pursuant to Property Line Adjustment Deed recorded May 10,2021, Recording No. 2021- 055842,as Tract 1 therein, located in the Northwest one-quarter and the Southwest one-quarter of Section 1, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon,and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most westerly southwest corner of Lot 1 of'Tech Center Business Park", recorded in Book 53, Page 29 of Washington County Plat Records, said point also being on the northeasterly right-of-way line of the Southern Pacific Railroad and being the most southerly corner of that properly described as Parcel V in that deed to Fred W. Fields as Trustee of the Fred W. Fields Revocable Living Trust, recorded on May 5, 2010 as Document Number 2010-033975,Washington County Deed Records;thence, along said northeasterly right-of-way line, North 41°55'03"West 1113.55 feet to the southeast corner of that property described as Tract 1 in a deed to David M. ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 8 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Envelope ID:6D0365F8-7C48-4653-AE02-054DODBC1193 Munro as successor trustee of the Fred W. Fields Revocable Living Trust Agreement recorded on August 13, 2015 as Document Number 2015-068819,Washington County Deed Records,from said point a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped "Northwest Surveying, Inc."bears South 29°34'10"West 2.00 feet; thence leaving said northeasterly right-of-way line along the southeasterly line of said Tract 1 and the northeasterly extension thereof, North 29°34'10" East 713.78 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped "Northwest Surveying, Inc."located at the southeast corner of that property described as Tract 2 in a deed to David M. Munro as successor trustee of the Fred W. Fields Revocable Living Trust Agreement recorded on June 22, 2015 as Document Number 2015-048836, Washington County Deed Records, and the POINT OF BEGINNING;thence along the southeasterly line of said Tract 2, North 29°34'10" East 423.50 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped"Northwest Surveying Inc."; thence departing said southeasterly line of Tract 2, North 60°25'50"West 410.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped"Northwest Surveying Inc." located on the southeasterly line of that property described in right-of-way Dedication Deed recorded on November 9, 2016 as Document Number 2016-092473,Washington County Deed Records; thence along the southeasterly line of said right-of-way Dedication Deed South 29°34'10"West 423.50 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of said Tract 2,said point being marked by a 5/8 inch iron rod with a yellow plastic cap stamped "Northwest Surveying, Inc."; thence along the southwesterly line of said Tract 2, South 60°25'50" East 410.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The basis of bearings for this description is survey number 32589,Washington County Survey Records, TOGETHER WITH a slope easement as described in Slope Easement Agreement recorded July 31, 2017, Recording No. 2017-060597 and First Amendment Slope Easement Agreement recorded November 24, 2021, Recording No. 2021-122737, Records of Washington County. ©1997 Commercial Association of Brokers OREGON/SW WASHINGTON(Rev.August/2018) PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND RECEIPT FOR EARNEST MONEY(OREGON) ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 9 of Error!Bookmark not defined.G DocuSign Certificate Of Completion Envelope Id:6D0365F87C484653AE02054D0DBC1193 Status:Completed Subject:Complete with DocuSign:Wall Street PSA City Executed.pdf Source Envelope: Document Pages:9 Signatures:2 Envelope Originator: Certificate Pages:4 Initials:0 Trevor Cheyne AutoNav: Enabled 12909 SW 68th Pkwy#350 Envelopeld Stamping: Enabled Portland,OR 97223 Time Zone: (UTC-08:00)Pacific Time(US&Canada) tcheyne@wfgnationaltitle.com IP Address: 192.100.29.5 Record Tracking Status:Original Holder:Trevor Cheyne Location: DocuSign 2/12/2024 3:01:28 PM tcheyne@wfgnationaltitle.com Signer Events Signature Timestamp Jack Martin r—DocuSignedby: Sent:2/12/2024 3:04:03 PM jackmartinis@protonmail.com ,)alk NLariilA, Viewed:2/12/2024 5:06:52 PM �163162F6916047D... MGR Signed:2/13/2024 9:42:27 AM Security Level: Email,Account Authentication (None) Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style Using IP Address:76.93.231.218 Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure: Accepted:2/12/2024 5:06:52 PM ID:67a2b07b-3437-4e9f-b224-4703549c2a59 In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp Witness Events Signature Timestamp Notary Events Signature Timestamp Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 2/12/2024 3:04:03 PM Certified Delivered Security Checked 2/12/2024 5:06:52 PM Signing Complete Security Checked 2/13/2024 9:42:27 AM Completed Security Checked 2/13/2024 9:42:27 AM Payment Events Status Timestamps Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure created on: 10/31/2013 5:28:43 PM Parties agreed to:Jack Martin CONSUMER DISCLOSURE From time to time, WFG National Title Insurance Company(we, us or Company) may be required by law to provide to you certain written notices or disclosures. Described below are the terms and conditions for providing to you such notices and disclosures electronically through your DocuSign, Inc. (DocuSign)Express user account. Please read the information below carefully and thoroughly, and if you can access this information electronically to your satisfaction and agree to these terms and conditions,please confirm your agreement by clicking the 'I agree'button at the bottom of this document. Getting paper copies At any time, you may request from us a paper copy of any record provided or made available electronically to you by us. For such copies, as long as you are an authorized user of the DocuSign system you will have the ability to download and print any documents we send to you through your DocuSign user account for a limited period of time (usually 30 days) after such documents are first sent to you. After such time, if you wish for us to send you paper copies of any such documents from our office to you, you will be charged a$0.00 per-page fee. You may request delivery of such paper copies from us by following the procedure described below. Withdrawing your consent If you decide to receive notices and disclosures from us electronically, you may at any time change your mind and tell us that thereafter you want to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format. How you must inform us of your decision to receive future notices and disclosure in paper format and withdraw your consent to receive notices and disclosures electronically is described below. Consequences of changing your mind If you elect to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format, it will slow the speed at which we can complete certain steps in transactions with you and delivering services to you because we will need first to send the required notices or disclosures to you in paper format, and then wait until we receive back from you your acknowledgment of your receipt of such paper notices or disclosures. To indicate to us that you are changing your mind, you must withdraw your consent using the DocuSign 'Withdraw Consent' form on the signing page of your DocuSign account. This will indicate to us that you have withdrawn your consent to receive required notices and disclosures electronically from us and you will no longer be able to use your DocuSign Express user account to receive required notices and consents electronically from us or to sign electronically documents from us. All notices and disclosures will be sent to you electronically Unless you tell us otherwise in accordance with the procedures described herein, we will provide electronically to you through your DocuSign user account all required notices, disclosures, authorizations, acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or made available to you during the course of our relationship with you. To reduce the chance of you inadvertently not receiving any notice or disclosure, we prefer to provide all of the required notices and disclosures to you by the same method and to the same address that you have given us. Thus, you can receive all the disclosures and notices electronically or in paper format through the paper mail delivery system. If you do not agree with this process,please let us know as described below. Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures electronically from us. How to contact WFG National Title Insurance Company: You may contact us to let us know of your changes as to how we may contact you electronically, to request paper copies of certain information from us, and to withdraw your prior consent to receive notices and disclosures electronically as follows: To contact us by email send messages to: gkuterdem@wfgnationaltitle.com To advise WFG National Title Insurance Company of your new e-mail address To let us know of a change in your e-mail address where we should send notices and disclosures electronically to you, you must send an email message to us at gkuterdem@wfgnationaltitle.com and in the body of such request you must state: your previous e-mail address, your new e-mail address. We do not require any other information from you to change your email address.. In addition, you must notify DocuSign, Inc to arrange for your new email address to be reflected in your DocuSign account by following the process for changing e-mail in DocuSign. To request paper copies from WFG National Title Insurance Company To request delivery from us of paper copies of the notices and disclosures previously provided by us to you electronically, you must send us an e-mail to gkuterdem@wfgnationaltitle.com and in the body of such request you must state your e-mail address, full name, US Postal address, and telephone number. We will bill you for any fees at that time, if any. To withdraw your consent with WFG National Title Insurance Company To inform us that you no longer want to receive future notices and disclosures in electronic format you may: i. decline to sign a document from within your DocuSign account, and on the subsequent page, select the check-box indicating you wish to withdraw your consent, or you may; ii. send us an e-mail to gkuterdem@wfgnationaltitle.com and in the body of such request you must state your e-mail, full name, IS Postal Address, telephone number, and account number. We do not need any other information from you to withdraw consent.. The consequences of your withdrawing consent for online documents will be that transactions may take a longer time to process.. Required hardware and software Operating Systems: Windows2000? or WindowsXP? Browsers (for SENDERS): Internet Explorer 6.0? or above Browsers (for SIGNERS): Internet Explorer 6.0?, Mozilla FireFox 1.0, NetScape 7.2 (or above) Email: Access to a valid email account Screen Resolution: 800 x 600 minimum Enabled Security Settings: •Allow per session cookies •Users accessing the internet behind a Proxy Server must enable HTTP 1.1 settings via proxy connection ** These minimum requirements are subject to change. If these requirements change, we will provide you with an email message at the email address we have on file for you at that time providing you with the revised hardware and software requirements, at which time you will have the right to withdraw your consent. Acknowledging your access and consent to receive materials electronically To confirm to us that you can access this information electronically, which will be similar to other electronic notices and disclosures that we will provide to you, please verify that you were able to read this electronic disclosure and that you also were able to print on paper or electronically save this page for your future reference and access or that you were able to e-mail this disclosure and consent to an address where you will be able to print on paper or save it for your future reference and access. Further, if you consent to receiving notices and disclosures exclusively in electronic format on the terms and conditions described above, please let us know by clicking the 'I agree'button below. By checking the 'I Agree'box, I confirm that: • I can access and read this Electronic CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC RECEIPT OF ELECTRONIC CONSUMER DISCLOSURES document; and • I can print on paper the disclosure or save or send the disclosure to a place where I can print it, for future reference and access; and • Until or unless I notify WFG National Title Insurance Company as described above, I consent to receive from exclusively through electronic means all notices, disclosures, authorizations, acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or made available to me by WFG National Title Insurance Company during the course of my relationship with you. ` I • r gibCiD.Q 1f 1l C�{�3 III: / 7 ' M V 1- 1- 2 l 5Z.5ncxxxxxxXS2S2S2QS?S?S?S OR •� 411 . IIisatfrii • git r IN/ isici .. - ,, 0 ‘.. . IOU @A 424-91-01 • a - fit bor-s. POob • 1 _ rp - �i'i ,' t T r Enims sou!ug: sugn2iy9i i + 9. aV156]@ @b CnusuUSouiug: �ugnz�G's�'b ; G - .: . F . s ri ' - i • a ��I, a•2 VCLG2 i -4-;; C a \\�\` : /� cf % ` \ 2nplsct bl.obsl.fA - i V t /40100 • \ ‘ !: \�\ . ' II-lir R .mows'