The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 02/13/2024 71 • City of Tigard Ti and Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL&LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND FEBRUARY 13,2024- 6:30 p.m.Business Meeting- Revised:Agenda Item No. 12- TIME: Executive Session was added. MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid- City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223-See PUBLIC NOTICE below PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with Oregon House Bill 2560,this will be a hybrid meeting where some Council, staff or public will participate in person and some will participate remotely. How to comment: •Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments by noon the day before the meeting date. •If attending the meeting in person,please fill out the public comment sign-in sheet at the front of the room and come to the microphone when your name is called. •If you prefer to call in,please call 503-966-4101 when instructed to be placed in the queue.We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to two minutes. •You may comment by video through the Teams app.Go to this link to learn how to participate by videa February 13,2024 Council Meeting (https://www.tigard-or.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/5245/372). Upon request,the City will endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM ONLINE:https://www.tigard-or.gov/boxcast CABLE VIEWERS:The City Council meeting will be shown live on Channel 21 (1st Tuesdays) and Channel 28 (2nd& 4th Tuesdays) at 6:30 p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Saturday 7:30 p.m. Sunday 11:30 a.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. " City of Tigard • • Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL&LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND FEBRUARY 13,2024- 6:30 p.m.Business Meeting- Revised:Agenda Item No. 12- TIME: Executive Session was added MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid- City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITION 3. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment B. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce C. Tigard High School Student Envoy D. Police Chief/Police Department Update E. Public Comment—Written F. Public Comment—In Person G. Public Comment—Phone-In H. Public Comment—Video 4. CITY MANAGER REPORT 6:50 p.m. estimated time 5. CONSENT AGENDA: (Local Contract Review Board) The Consent Agenda is used for routine items including approval of meeting minutes,contracts or intergovernmental agreements. Information on each item is available on the city's website in the packet for this meeting.These items may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Council members may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. 6:55 p.m. estimated time A. RIVER TERRACE 2.0 COMMUNITY PLANNING (PLANNING SERVICES) CONTRACT • Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 6. FY24 BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST#2 7:00 p.m. estimated time 7. BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL PROCESS DISCUSSION 7:10 p.m. estimated time 8. RENEWAL LEVY- SECOND DISCUSSION OF BALLOT TITLE AND REFERRAL 7:30 p.m. estimated time 9. CHARTER AMENDMENT- SECOND DISCUSSION OF BALLOT TITLE AND REFERRAL 7:50 p.m. estimated time 10. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR CONCEPT FINAL REPORT 8:10 p.m. estimated time 11. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and duties of a public body with regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed under ORS 192.660(2) (h).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 8:50 p.m. estimated time 13. ADJOURNMENT 9:20 p.m. estimated time Supplemental Packet for February 13, 2024 Council Meeting - Item 3. B. Tigard Chamber of Commerce City Council Update February 2024 Leadership Tigard We held Government Day today where we heard from several local businesses who interact with local Government as well as City Staff and local Government officials.The class is working hard on their project which we look forward to sharing more about next month. Education,Advocacy, & Building a Strong Local Economy • Our Government Affairs & Public Policy Committee will be meeting February 15th and has moved to an online format to be more accessible to a wider range of businesses. • We held a listening session with Representative Bowman and it was well attended with a diverse group of businesses and nonprofits represented. Look for more opportunities like this coming soon. • Our Scholarship Program is now accepting applications. All High School Seniors in 97223 and 97224 are encouraged to apply. Deadline is coming up at the end of this month. All information can be found on the Tigard Chamber website. • Our Tigard Small Business Sustainability Fund is now open for applications. All the details and application can be found on our website. Please do be sure to turn in all supporting documentation in a timely manner for your application to be considered complete. Promoting Community Save the date for our 50th Anniversary Shining Stars which will be held May 10th 2024 at Embassy Suites in Tigard. Nominations are now open for all of our awards. Please visit the Tigard Chamber website to submit your nominations. Deadline for nominations is March 15th and we have a few categories with no nominations. Networking/Visibility (Check the Chamber Calendar for details) Good Morning Tigard (GMT),Thursday A.M. Networking 7:30 a.m.—Weekly Tigard Farmers Market Update The Tigard Farmers Market is still accepting vendors for our 33rd Season via Manage My Market! We have a few sponsorships still available, please call the Chamber office for more details. We are still hiring for our Day of Market Assistant, if you have experience with Farmers Markets or managing events you are encouraged to apply for this rewarding seasonal part time position. Save the Dates (Read all of these aloud) Bowl-O-Rama Saturday March 9th 2024 at Tigard Bowl has a few spots left Shining Stars May 10th 2024 at Embassy Suites tickets on sale in March Please follow the Tigard Chamber on Linkedln, Instagram, and Facebook for the most up to date information on what is going on at the Chamber in real time and all our events! Supplemental Packet for February 13, 2024 Council Meeting - Item 3. D. *yvPDERs A w r Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard po , POLICE •�•� 1E: tz. For January 2024 At 4, TIG%Rn ; c�p 0R /. 4� 2021 Population Estimate 55,854 (Adopted Budget FY 2023-24) LIn�.*TE a'�� 0 Small numbers cause large percentage increases and decreases. Illr Crime Snapshot V Selected Group A Offenses Jan-23 Jan-24 %Chg 2023 YTD 2024 YTD %Chg Person Crime 46 50 0 8.70% 46 50 0 8.70% Assault 34 38 0 11.76% 34 38• 11.76% Robbery 4 6 0 50.00% 4 6 0 50.00% Domestic Violence 21 16 0 -23.81% 21 16 0 -23.81% Property Crime J 228 211 0 -7.46% 228 211 0 -7.46% Burglary-Residential 7 3 0 -57.14% 7 3 0 -57.14% Burglary-Business 6 11 • 83.33% 6 11 • 83.33% Burglary-Other 3 12 0 300.00% 3 12 0 300.00% Unauthorized Use of Motor Vehicle 23 8 0 -65.22% 23 8 0 -65.22% Theft 114 116 0 1.75% 114 116 0 1.75% Organized Retail Theft 1 22 0 2100.00% 1 22 0 2100.00% Vandalism 35 37 0 5.71% 35 37 0 5.71% Graffiti 5 17 0 240.00% 5 17 0 240.00% Societal Crimes 1== 43 63 0 46.51% 43 63• 46.51% DUII 12 15 0 25.00% 12 15 0 25.00% Drug Offense 4 1 • -75.00% 4 1 0 -75.00% Disorderly Conduct 2 9 0 350.00% 2 9 0 350.00% Police Officer Holds 4 5• 25.00% 4 5• 25.00% DHS Referrals 64 35 0 -45.31% 64 35 0 -45.31% Arrests (*CTA in Total) 98 128 0 30.61% L 98 128 0 30.61% Felony 15 12 0 -20.00% 15 12 0 -20.00% Misdemeanor 29 37 0 27.59% 29 37 0 27.59% Citation To Appear 22 40 0 81.82% 22 40 0 81.82% Warrants 32 39 0 21.88% 32 39 0 21.88% Calls for Service Jan-23 Jan-24 %Chg 2023 YTD 2024 YTD %Chg Dispatched Calls 1771 1738 0 -1.86% 1771 1738 0 -1.86% Self Initiated Calls 1119 1131 0 1.07% 1119 1131 0 1.07% Online Crime Reports 70 52• -25.71% 70 52• -25.71% Response Time Jan-23 Jan-24 %Chg 2023 YTD 2024 YTD %Chg Priority 1 &2 5.75 6.02 0 4.70% 5.75 6.02 0 4.70% Priority 3 10.63 9.95 0 -6.40% 10.63 9.95 0 -6.40% Priority 4+ 11.22 10.65 0 -5.08% 11.22 10.65 0 -5.08% *Person Crime-Assault(verbal harassment,menacing,simple and felony assault),Homicide,Robbery,Kidnap,Forcible/Non-Forcible Sex Offense *Property Crimes-Arson,Bribery,Res Burglary,Bus Burglary,Oth Burglary,Forgery,Vandalism,Embezzle,Fraud,Theft,UUMV,Bad Check *Societal Crimes-Drug Offense,Prostitution,Weapons,Curfew,DisCon,DUII,Family Offense,Liqour Laws,Peeping Tom,Trespass *The data is National Incident Based Reporting System(NIBRS)compliant and not Uniform Crime Report(UCR)compliant and cannot be compared to any report using that standard.For more info on NIBRS:https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/ucr/nibrs 1 ry��,phR,xtA*l Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard .Q -"'; ct, eco H For January 2024 *4:.`* 4 2021 Population Estimate 55,854 (Adopted Budget FY 2023-24) 4'4:t CR *TBA�'�O Employee Snapshot Department Staffing Information Actual Budget %Budget Sworn 71.0 77.0 92% Non-Sworn 16.0 18.5 86% Total Number of Personnel 87.0 95.5 91% Patrol Staffing Authorized 43 I Days Swings Graves Overall% #of Shifts at or below Minimums 9 29% 12 39% 17 55% 41% #of Shifts conducted with 5 or more Days Swings Graves Overall% patrol officers 5 16% 19 61% 7 23% 33% Personnel Unavailable for Work Patrol All Other Overall #of Recruits in Pre-Academy 1 - 1 #of Recruits in Academy 1 - 1 #of Recruits in Recruit Training 5 - 5 #of Personnel on Extended Sick Leave/FMLA - - - #of Personnel on Military Leave 1 - 1 #of Personnel on Modified Duty* 5 - 5 #of Personnel on Administrative Leave - - Total Personnel Unavailable to Work during some Period during the Month - 13 Total Officers Available to work PATROL some period during the Month 30 *Modified Duty=any modified work schedule to accommodate light duty,workers comp,orLWOP MIll'Operational Effectiveness Snapshot gi Budget Information is based on the best available data. FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Budget Budget **September actuals are incomplete due to software migration** Percent YTD Status Percent YTD Status Department Budget Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Administrative • 0% 0% Operations • 0% evs,pv�r 0% Services • ° ave co'�� otyet 0% Total Department Budget oU�t` �soep v •rest 0% t. Budget Information is based on the best available data. FY O a,GG GtUa\s a`�aoe. **September actuals are incomplete due to software migration** Pel O bid ,et-'t°"Ceaa,\V1 av _cnt YTD Budget Status t' t Department Overtime Actual Actual Budgeted Administrative 0% • 0% Operations 1C) 0% • 0% Services `] 0% • 0% Total Overtime 0% • 0% 2 q0:i E` x� � Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard For January 2024 4s 2021 Population Estimate 55,854 (Adopted Budget FY 2023-24) e *TE?I Levy Status Update Levy Staffing Information-LEVY to date progress Actual Budget %Budget Sworn-Patrol _ 8.0 8.0 100% Sworn-SRO 1.0 1.0 100% Non-Sworn 1.0 2.0 50% Total Number of Personnel 10.0 11.0 91% Ilim Emergency Response Times - 5 Year Trend PRIORITY 1 & 2 CALLS Priority 1 calls= 6.4 Imminent threat to life 6.02 /5.95\ / 5.75 5.57 Priority 2 calls =Immediate threat to life,occuring now 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Community Snapshot Community Outreach and Events News Releases (5) Upcoming Events eMMil (1/9)Leadership Tigard Results of Recent DUII Enforcement (2/1)Good Morning Tigard (1/11&1/25)Good Morning Tigard Upcoming Speed and Distracted Driving (2/6)Community Resources @ St.Anthony's (1/11)Chat with the Chief @ Summerfield Enforcement (2/10)Mother/Daughter Self Defense Class (1/20)Self Defense Class @ Summerfield Upcoming Seat Belt and Car Seat Enforcement (2/15)Healing&Unifying Summit @ Muslim Ed Trust (1/23)Breakfast Rotary Presentation Three People Arrested in 2022 Double Murder (2/19)Family Promise Open House (1/24)Social Justice Listening Session @ St.Anthony's Joint News Release:Man Arrested in Several (2/19)Girl Scout Presentation (1/25)Scam Presentation @ NW Christian Church Armed Robberies (2/20)Community Meeting @ Red Rock Creek Commons (1/25)Senior Resource Fair (2/21)Scam Presentation @ St.Anthony's (1/29)K-9 Presentation @ Alberta Rider (2/24)The Evolve Experience (1/30)Meeting with DHS Self Sufficiency (2/28)Cocoa with a Cop @ Nordstrom Ebar (1/31)K-9 Presentation @ Durham Elementary (2/29)Jammies&Books @ Metzger Elementary V Photo Enforcement Red Light- Began Issuing 03/11/20 Month of: Jan 2024 YTD 2023 2024 Yr to Yr Received Issued Rejected Issued Issued %Chg 99W/SW Hall Blvd 143 110 33 204 110 -46% 99W/SW 72nd Ave 86 55 31 98 55 -44% 99W/SW Durham Rd 28 21 7 13 21 62% Intersection Speed - Began Issuing 7/14/20 Month of: Jan 2024 YTD 2023 2024 Yr to Yr Received Issued Rejected Issued Issued %Chg 99W/SW Hall Blvd 56 40 16 126 40 -68% 99W/SW 72nd Ave 146 117 29 695 117 -83% 3 (.7ERshzt, 4-Y--' --- 1' Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard For January 2024 2021 Population Estimate 55,854 (Adopted Budget FY 2023-24) Calls For Service - By Month: 5 Year Trend jimMEIM 1 JANUARY DISPATCHED CALLS JANUARY SELF INITIATED CALLS 1822 1457 ze- "..,..„„„ 1286 1771 '''''''....,... 1034 .,......, ..... ..........„. ................... 1119--^1131 ........,...... 1738 1707 1667 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2022 2023 2024 orkload Dist i' Total Dispatched Calls: 1738 Total Societal Calls: 1154 %of monthly workload 66% . Wtrligli' ...'''' 5. BROCKMAN II" I ';'• . 529 37u „To 11; 34 a -- qltiS ' CD tt a : 0 0 • , m a) 508 (‘CO C) e _._. Tigard 45 2 - 4 Z CI 41 1* CD SO G 0 0 0 .,4 BuLt. 4 "oc. 230 '; e CD CD = 6 4 . 13• 0 0 (3) Ktng - City -24 17• - _ . .,- , 0_5 1 mi Nib r 4 tiv0) 'sk1A Supplemental Packet v ,� Tigard Police De artment Council Meeting - Item 3. D. ' H ,4 , ., a Strategic Dashboard forJanuary2024 .,. ..) let*YE POi°1 Days Swings Graves Overall % # of Shifts at or below Minimums 9 29% ' 12 39% 17 55% 41% # of Shifts conducted with 5 or more Days Swings Graves Overall % patrol officers 5 16% 19 61% 7 23% 33% ti� DA , -/-„,„ _.„ :§, ,vOLICtTigard Police Department k�. = SDashboard forJanuary2024 - ''-;;?p, OR ,4 �' cE*TE10%. 10 r Af 7w we .. 31 e 58, 51 t c a - 11 4 0 ‘, 01. Ct. 4 } a. 0. a „ W 0 ut Sj „,,,[. —..—. 71g2Cd 2 0 )31 so G. o aw euLL Y III© CD 00 .. 1,A 0 13• sem '. wit,an ED • W our ss N9 RP King a) ` City °: .24 17 a a t i 7► SM ru4LLFIN RP 'Mil 11111 r TIGARD Written Public Comment for the February 13, 2024 Tigard City Council meeting Safe Lots (35) 26.James Wilkkinson 1. Dona Zarr 27.Kerry Francetich 2. Jennifer Gulzow 28.Kathleen Whitman 3. Gary Krieger 29.Amanda Combs 4. Russel Birdsey 30.Jack Voorhees 5. Jen Macnab Brost 31.Jan Gould 6. Shelley Vallereux 32.Trevor Combs 7. Christine Dunn 33.Gary Kopka 8. Holly Myers 34.Michael Byers 9. Marsden Smith 35.Anna Murphy 10.Corina Torseth 11.Lindsey Voorhees Derry Dell (2) 12.Terri Rise 1. Jeff Darland 13.Grace Kelso 2. Sara Darland 14.Megan Hamilton 15.Tyler Birdsey Hall Boulevard (1) 16.Patrick Abruzzini 1. Rep. Bowman, Rep. Neron, Sen. 17.Xin Dudley Woods 18.Darrick Purfield 19.Kelly Price Fireworks (1) 20.Haojie Cui 1. Don Layman 21.Christine Eykelbosch 22.Theresa Bemis 23.Alexi Reeve 24.Marsden Smith 25.Rosalie Francetich Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 12:06 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2984145 IP Address: 73.157.171.134 Submission Date: 02/05/2024 12:06 Survey Time: 3 minutes,44 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name DONA Zarr Email Complete Address 12010 sw Ann street ,Tigard 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Church sponsored homeless car park Comments We need to approve this.The church is doing what I would hope Christians do. Helping people three at a time. I have lived in Tigard since 1988. I had always thought we were a caring community. Please approve this, don't let the elitist bigots have the only voice. We need this! Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 12:18 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2984192 IP Address: 73.25.111.33 Submission Date: 02/05/2024 12:17 Survey Time: 3 minutes,46 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jennifer Gulzow Email Complete Address 12330 SW Marion St Tigard,Oregon 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Just Compassion houseless parking spots Comments I live within 1.5 miles of the church and 100%support this service being implemented.Just Compassion has fantastic results with their pilot program (according to their report). Programs like this should continue to be funded and built around Tigard.The vilification of the houseless community by some people in Tigard is sickening and disheartening. Please, please, please push forward with this! Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 8:04 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2985382 IP Address: 73.164.129.38 Submission Date: 02/05/2024 8:03 Survey Time: 8 minutes, 59 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Gary Krieger Email Complete Address 12743 SW Rocky Mountain Ct Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Parking at the church off of Bull Mountain rd. Comments This is a horrible idea not only for the community but for those being placed there. It's too far away from a secure location and is very dark.You're asking for people to get hurt there by allowing this.As someone who was homeless in my early 20s for a time,this location will result in additional crime and or violence not just to the home owners nearby but to the people you are placing there. It's quite shameful that this is even being considered to be a good thing. If there is truly someone that cares for these people,and not just showboating that we are good people they would take them temporarily into their homes or a secure location that is monitored.At the very least drug testing and actual security.The first person assaulted, raped, or killed comes down on the people that think this is a good thing to do. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 6:45 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2988345 IP Address: 35.136.2.210 Submission Date: 02/07/2024 6:45 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 5 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Russel Birdsey Email Complete Address 16779 SW Colorado Ln Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program, but absolutely implore the city to restrict funding and consider criteria for locations near schools and homes.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton near the library recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city: Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date Explore using public property farther away from homes and schools to host Safe Parking projects in Tigard Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location criteria to limit these projects to locate within a reasonable distance of schools(including daycares and preschools)and homes All funding decisions for this project should be put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been approved by the city-post this information publicly for all to access Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard 1 This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 8:35 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2988641 IP Address: 157.97.134.59 Submission Date: 02/07/2024 8:34 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 34 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jeff Darland Email Complete Address 11140 sw novare pl tigard,Oregon 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Ecosystem recovery and current/future impacts on infrastructure Comments Hello, I was able to present an abbreviated version of my comments last night(6-Feb),as time was restricted. Please find attached my prepared statement as originally intended Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Ecosystem Recovery and Infrastructure.pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Hello, my name is Jeff Darland, and I live in the Genesis Loop neighborhood. Dairy Dell creek flows through our neighborhood on it's way past Walnut St and connects to Fanno Creek down in Woodard Park. As a family, we have been walking the wonderful trail system along our creek system for more than a dozen years. Over this time, we have witnessed a fairly remarkable transition in the ecosystem. What once was predominantly eroding ditches covered by blackberries has been transformed. A lot of work has gone into this restoration, and first and foremost I want to say that from my point of view the efforts have been a huge success. A perfect example of this is the Dairy Dell wetland area just north of Walnut. What a wonderful example of restoration. From where it was a decade ago, which was a fairly bleak ditch, to today is a stunning example of ecosystem recovery. Started by the city of Tigard,but I consider it a shared project between the city and our local beavers -who of course are a keystone species. I was fortunate to be able to sit down with some folks from the city today (6-Feb), who were kind enough to share quite a bit of time talking through the history and some of the challenges which led to the recent killing of some beavers in the Dairy Dell wetland just south of Walnut. This is a very complex issue, indeed. But, I did leave the meeting confident that removal was both necessary and done as a last resort. And,based on my conversation, not particularly desired. This conversation highlighted to me some of the challenges we are facing as ecological recovery processes start, or rather continue to encroach on existing infrastructure, either public or private. There does not seem to be a lot of public discussion on this. On which areas are going to be allowed to expand(managed or unmanaged),which areas are friendly to beavers, and which are no go zones (and why). It seems to me that if we are a beaver dam away from a problem with our infrastructure, we are lacking in resilience, and will likely be facing increasing maintenance costs in the future regardless of the presence of beavers...that is if we continue to allow the ecosystems to continue to recover. If we intercede in the natural recovery of our flood plains through any number of means, we sign up for continued maintenance costs and continued degradation of nature. If we let recovery continue, ill- placed infrastructure becomes at risk. While I am still seeking to get my arms around this issue, I would ask the city council to consider a few requests: 1) I would like to ask that the city notify the public in advance of any future beaver elimination so as to allow for the possibility of relocation as opposed to killing. I don't quite know what a reasonable time would be, but I believe there are a few non-profits that would work with you on this. 2) I believe that we would benefit from explicit maps showing the areas that ecological restoration (that is riparian and wetland areas)will be allowed to continue to expand along with the keystone species, and where wetlands will be artificially limited and beaver will allowed to be removed. Specifically, it should be clear what is the infrastructure at risk, so we can begin to discuss as a community. I look forward to engaging with the city as we move towards a more sustainable future. Thank you for your consideration. Jeff Darland, 6-Feb, 2024 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2024 10:37 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2989082 IP Address: 146.197.122.3 Submission Date: 02/07/2024 10:37 Survey Time: 11 minutes, 55 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Sara Darland Email Complete Address 11140 SW Novare Place Tigard,OR 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Derry Dell wetlands and other wetlands in Tigard Comments I provided public comment at the city council meeting last night(2/6) but was unable to finish my statement due to the reduced time. Please find it attached in it's entirety. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images beaver city council statement.pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 My name is Sara and I live in the Genesis Loop neighborhood. Today I'd like to talk about community engagement and transparency in relation to how our city manages our wetlands and ask that Tigard join the Tualatin Basin Beaver Strategy project. I volunteer for The Wetlands Conservancy, and I have personally surveyed the wetlands both north and south of walnut for beaver activity. I also volunteer for Nitrate Watch and take nitrate measurements throughout our watershed. The water upstream of the Derry Dell wetlands consistently has higher nitrate readings than the water below — the wetlands are removing the pollutants. I love our wetlands and see them as something the city is doing "right" in the face of climate change. I was shocked when I discovered that the city took the drastic action to kill beavers in our wetlands with zero transparency or community engagement. The signs installed by APHIS were inaccessible unless you waded through the mud. APHIS never answered the phone or returned my calls so I finally called the city, where I still encountered countless people who had no idea what was happening at Derry Dell Wetlands. I'd like to ask the city to host an information session for the community about how they intend to manage Derry Dell and other wetlands. I was told the creek channel south of Walnut will be rerouted. I was also told the area is planned to be beaver free but am unclear on how the city intends to keep them out. I'd like the city to either create or share policy that includes a clear order of steps and escalation process for wetland and infrastructure conflict. I'd like the city to join the Tualatin Basin Beaver Strategy project. This project is a collaboration between the Tualatin River Watershed Council, the Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation District, Clean Water Services, and the Wetlands Conservancy. These groups are working towards a basin-wide coordinated beaver strategy which will address the impacts from beavers on public and private property and infrastructure in the Tualatin Basin. Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2024 11:47 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2995357 IP Address: 71.193.231.236 Submission Date: 02/10/2024 11:47 Survey Time: 6 minutes, 1 second You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jen Macnab Brost Email Complete Address 16648 SW 88th PI Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Comments To those involved in the Safe Parking Program conversation, My active involvement in the Just Compassion effort began in 2016 when I enthusiastically joined Darla Samuelson in her vision to help those living outdoors. From 2016-2020, I engaged in the conversation and with the community through: -attending Just Compassion coalition meetings&donating financially,-volunteering at the Unity Laundromat with Showers& Laundry,and-serving dinners at the St.Anthony Sunday night Community cafe.Through these volunteer efforts, I heard many stories from those living outdoors,in cars, or low-income housing.And I celebrated when Just Compassion broke ground in their current space, believing they would enable stability through providing access to PO Box, internet, laundry,etc.Thus, I stepped back from volunteering. However, as a Tigard resident, I continue to follow the conversation and now have deep concerns as I have watched an expansionist narrative unfold.We now need outhouses scattered around the city and are discussing expanding parking programs. I know that Troy,while living in his vehicle,was closest to thriving when he faced pressure to remove his broken-down car from the street. He accepted a job to live a different outcome. Expanding pockets of non-permanent housing into more neighborhoods is not in the best interest of anyone-particularly those seeking permanent housing.Though I do not live in Bull Mountain, I share a deep concern over the Safe Parking Program.We are all speaking into this matter as Tigard residents.Conversely,the President of the Board of Directors for Just Compassion Board of Directors moved out of the county some time ago and so this voice is no longer speaking as a locally invested resident.Thank you for your consideration,Jen Macnab Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard 1 This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2024 4:49 PM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2995689 IP Address: 98.246.79.201 Submission Date: 02/10/2024 4:49 Survey Time: 26 minutes,4 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Shelley Vallereux Email Complete Address 14550 SW 130th Ave Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Proposed Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials, I recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that the Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain neighborhood.While sadly there's a great need for this program, I implore the city to restrict funding and consider criteria for locations near schools,apartment complexes and homes.Another church just about a block up the hill provides a preschool and an apartment complex shares a fence line with this proposed site. In addition there are homes right across a side street and another large apartment complex across Bull Mountain Rd. We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity that is happening all over the Metro area often associated with the homeless population. I'm asking you to take the safety and security of your constituents seriously by adopting the following: Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices.To date we have not been fully able to participate. Explore using public property farther away from homes and schools to host this Safe Parking project in Tigard Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location criteria to limit these projects to locate within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares&preschools),apartment complexes and home.All funding decisions for this project should be put to a city council vote. I ask for continued transparency and accountability as you work on my behalf as well as all your constituents. Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available.Your constituents have the right to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been approved by the city. Post this information publicly for all to access.As I said in the beginning, it's sad that there is great need for this program, but implementing it poorly without consideration from all comes at great risk.Thank you. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 9:44 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2996128 IP Address: 50.126.66.188 Submission Date: 02/11/2024 9:43 Survey Time: 1 minute,47 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Christine Dunn Email Complete Address 15295 SW Bull Mountain Rd Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Christ the King proposed homeless car parking Comments See attached letter Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Christ the King Homeless Car 2-11-2024.doc Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 February 11, 2024 Dear City Council Elected Officials, As you know we recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location. I attended and spoke at the Council meeting last week where we were informed that no decisions have been made, no permits issued and there will have public forums to solicit community input. I was saddened to hear that there was some harassment and I don't believe it came from the organized Bull Mountain residents. By attending this meeting I saw first hand that the parking lot and gated parking lot on this property had several spaces for cars. It was brought up that this would be an ideal spot to try this program out in Tigard since the Police Department is there to assist in security. If this program is to be successful it seems this idea has more merit than putting it in a residential community. We do not dispute the merits of this program, but absolutely implore the city to restrict funding and consider criteria for locations near schools and homes. These programs have a life of their own and the initial programs seem to fade and unintended consequences happen. Those include the issues facing Beaverton with the homeless shelter by a school. I don't know all the details and yet the parents have voiced their concerns over dropping their children off at the school with a naked person there. They have also shared that they have found drug paraphernalia close to the school. We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity, such as the incidents are taking place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton . We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs. These programs have the best intentions and then as time goes on the security and monitoring of these programs diminishes or is non existent. To my knowledge there is nothing to prevent this initial program from growing into a homeless encampment. We ask the city for the following: • Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. • Explore using public property farther away from homes and schools to host Safe Parking projects in Tigard • Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location criteria to limit these projects to locate within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools) and homes • All funding decisions for this project should be put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents • Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been approved by the city- post this information publicly for all to access. I'm still not sure how the neighborhood found out about this proposal since it wasn't a public forum. Thank you for your time and serious consideration of our concerns. Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 9:45 PM To: Carol Krager; Jesse Raymundo; Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2996753 IP Address: 98.246.40.230 Submission Date: 02/11/2024 9:45 Survey Time: 3 minutes, 3 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Holly Myers Email Complete Address Tigard, OR 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Comments see attached Attachment Supporting Documents/Images SafeParkingProgramComments2.11.24.pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 02/11/2024 RE: Proposed Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church Dear City Council Elected Officials and Program Managers, I submitted a long letter on 02/04/24 to your online portal and received no follow up other than a confirmation email of my submission. In summary, I have the following asks: • Please investigate utilizing public property farther away from the Bull Mountain community and adding criteria to limit Safe Parking Projects to a location away from schools, daycares, and residential homes. • Ensure the permitting process for these types of projects are public and readily available. • Ensure there are consequences if participants or program managers do not follow rules. • Please put all funding decisions for this project (and those similar) to a city council vote so our elected officials can remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents. Respectfully, Holly Myers Concerned Homeowner in Bull Mountain Jesse Raymundo From: Jesse Raymundo Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 1:08 PM To: Jesse Raymundo Subject: FW: *NEW SUBMISSION* General Feedback Form From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 3:39:54 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US &Canada) To: kent@tigard-or.gov <kent@tigard-or.gov>; Webteam <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* General Feedback Form General Feedback Form Submission#: 2992401 IP Address: 50.219.34.210 Submission Date: 02/08/2024 3:39 Survey Time: 3 minutes,39 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. What type of question/feedback: General Comment Name Don Layman Phone Email Your Location Feedback Supper bummed to hear about the fireworks drone show.Our kids are 4 and 6 and are just getting to the age to enjoy fireworks. Not only that buy my mother in law just purchased a home right next to cook park with a great view of the firework show and will never get to see it now.We have walked to the field with all our neighbors and enjoyed the show for years. I'm bummed to see you listening to the voices that cry the loudest and not realize the field is packed year after year with people that enjoy the show.The extra cost subsidized by the city as well is unbelievable. I will not vote for any bond for additional police etc.Stop wasting our money on additional expenses we don't need.Just cancel it all together if you're going to cancel it.Super bummed that our leadership is allowing this to happen Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 Jesse Raymundo From: Jesse Raymundo Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 1:09 PM To: Jesse Raymundo Subject: FW: *NEW SUBMISSION* General Feedback Form From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2024 5:15:18 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US &Canada) To: kent@tigard-or.gov <kent@tigard-or.gov>; Webteam <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* General Feedback Form General Feedback Form Submission#: 2995715 IP Address: 50.54.144.24 Submission Date: 02/10/2024 5:15 Survey Time: 16 minutes,42 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. What type of question/feedback: Name Marsden Smith Phone Email Your Location Tigard Feedback Homeless parking program and Goals Regarding the goal of mitigating carbon pollution. Having people drive to and from a parking lot in Tigard and having them idle their motors, periodically for heat or air conditioning does not reduce the carbon problem.Saying they would do it anyway is a circular argument. Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail 1 may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 Jesse Raymundo From: Rep Bowman <Rep.BenBowman@oregonlegislature.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 8:18 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo Subject: Public Comments for Hall Boulevard Hearing Attachments: letter of support Hall blvd (3).pdf Some people who received this message don't often get email from rep.benbowman@oregonlegislature.gov. Learn why this is important Good morning, Attached is a public comment from Rep Bowman, Rep Neron, and Senator Woods for the City Council meeting tomorrow. Reach out with any further questions! thank you, Bridget `--0.F, O. Bridget O'Brien (she/her) y.,, 4:_ : O Legislative Aide ..X! Office of Representative Ben Bowman House District 25 I Tigard,Metzger, & South Beaverton 900 Court Street,H-484, Salem OR 97301 Rep.BenBowman@oregonlegislature.gov Cell: I W: oregonlegislature.gov/bowman Keep up with Rep Bowman by subscribing to his newsletter here. 1 OF O 1859 OREGON STATE LEGISLATURE Feb. 12, 2024 Dear Tigard City Council, As Tigard's representatives in the legislature, we are writing to convey our enthusiastic support for the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Concept Design Report. This report marks a crucial milestone in addressing a longstanding and pressing issue: the urgent need for infrastructure and safety improvements to Hall Boulevard. For decades, Tigard residents have voiced valid concerns about Hall Boulevard's deteriorating condition, highlighting alarming safety risks, deficient roadway conditions, and inefficient design. In its current condition, Hall Boulevard is not safe for our community, especially children walking to school. This was made clear with the tragic loss of two community members, Karen Kain and Maria Negrete, who were killed on Hall in separate accidents,just within the last two years. This is unacceptable and underscores the need for ODOT to turn ownership of this orphaned highway over to Tigard. During the 2023 legislative session, we made Hall Boulevard a top priority. With support from the community, Congresswoman Andrea Salinas, Mayor Heidi Lueb, and Tigard City Councilors, we passed HB 2793. This bill established a Jurisdictional Transfer Advisory Committee to facilitate the transfer of three ODOT-owned urban arterials. We are pleased to see progress on this front, with the new committee poised to identify and prioritize transfer candidates later this year. Separately, we secured$3 million for safety improvements on Hall. Tigard's commitment to enhancing safety and walkability reflects the transportation needs of its vibrant and growing community of over 50,000 residents. By proactively engaging the community in developing the strategic vision for Hall Boulevard, Tigard has positioned itself well to receive state transportation funding in 2025. We extend our gratitude to Mayor Lueb and the Tigard City Council for their determination and continued partnership. In the spirit of collaboration, we offer our steadfast support for the Concept Design Report and look forward to continuing to work together to ensure a brighter, wider, smoother, and safer future for Hall Boulevard. Sincerely, Senator Aaron Woods (SD-13) Representative Ben Bowman(HD-25) Representative Courtney Neron(HD-26) , ),/sk_.-- ..--..." 0 pe..,,,......„,...._...„ Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 8:42 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997323 IP Address: 50.38.39.15 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 8:41 Survey Time: 6 minutes, 2 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Corina Torseth Email Complete Address 13758 SW Alpine View Tigard,Or 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Proposed Tigard Safe Park at Christ the King Lutheran Church on Bull Mountain Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said,we implore the city to implement funding criteria for locations near schools and homes,to keep our neighborhood safe and livable.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton near the library recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city: Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date Explore using public property farther away from homes and schools to host Safe Parking projects in Tigard Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location criteria to limit these projects to locate within a reasonable distance of schools(including daycares and preschools)and homes All funding decisions for this project should be put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been approved by the city-post this information publicly for all to access. In addition,the program should provide security and implement drug testing for eligible candidates. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:21 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997464 IP Address: 50.39.217.96 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:21 Survey Time: 1 minute,2 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Lindsey Voorhees Email Complete Address 14336 SW 128th PI Portland,Oregon 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking in Bull Mtn. Neighborhood Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said,we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city:Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools)and home.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:28 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997492 IP Address: 98.246.41.51 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:28 Survey Time: 3 minutes, 15 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Terri Rise Email Complete Address 13887 SW Uplands Drive Tigard,OR 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Proposed Safe Parking program. Comments see attached Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Safe parking program.pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 SAFE PARKING PROGRAM I recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program located behind Christ the King church. Because the program is new and has not been sanctioned by federal funders, little is known about how the programs operate and their impacts. This community is resistant to the proposed location and it is our hope that the city of abandon this proposed lot. I attended the Tuesday open meeting at the church and it was overwhelmingly apparent, this is not a welcome location. Tigard Mayor Heidi Lueb attempted to insult the community today by gaslighting valid concerns raised by residents. We residents are not opposed to the service, but not in a residential area where there are families, seniors and other tax paying citizens that are affected by this proposal, and not in a good way. Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:40 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997542 IP Address: 98.246.184.176 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:40 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 53 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Grace Kelso Email Complete Address 14430 SW 128th PI Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Park Program proposed at Christ the King Comments Hi, I'm a neighbor that lives on Bull Mountain. I'm concerned about this proposed site. I think the City should host an electronic open house to get public comment on this before it chooses to fund this. Restrictions should be in place to ensure that we make this program as safe as possible-proximity to schools and children is my biggest concern.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-I want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:41 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997546 IP Address: 73.25.212.53 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:41 Survey Time: 15 minutes, 53 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Megan Hamilton Email Complete Address 14420 SW 114th Ave. Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program at Bull Mountain Comments While I understand the need for compassionate solutions for those experiencing houselessness, I believe it is crucial to consider the potential impacts on our neighborhood. My concerns are as follows: Public Safety and Neighborhood Security:Allowing individuals to sleep in their cars raises concerns about public safety and neighborhood security. It is essential to address potential issues and the impact on the sense of general security among residents. Limited Access to Services: Providing individuals with the option to sleep in cars is a temporary solution. I am concerned about the lack of access to essential and regular services for those experiencing houselessness,such as mental health support,addiction counseling,and social services.Community Engagement: I urge the City Council to actively engage with the residents of our neighborhoods before implementing such a proposal.Community input is vital in shaping policies that affect our daily lives and the overall well-being of our community. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images City Council Testimony.pdf Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Dear City Council Members, My name is Megan Hamilton, and I am a resident of Bull Mountain. I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church. This church parking lot is located on the other side of a short, chain-link fence from the backyard where my children and their friends play freely. This parking lot also currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot. I watch middle school students walk through the parking lot every morning on the way to their bus stop at the corner of 114th and Bull Mtn. While I understand the need for compassionate solutions for those experiencing houselessness, I believe it is crucial to consider the potential impacts on our neighborhood. My concerns are as follows: Public Safety and Neighborhood Security: Allowing individuals to sleep in their cars raises concerns about public safety and neighborhood security. It is essential to address potential issues and the impact on the sense of general security among residents. Limited Access to Services: Providing individuals with the option to sleep in cars is a temporary solution. I am concerned about the lack of access to essential services for those experiencing houselessness, such as mental health support, addiction counseling, and social services. Community Engagement: I urge the City Council to actively engage with the residents of our neighborhood before implementing such a proposal. Community input is vital in shaping policies that affect our daily lives and the overall well-being of our community. I appreciate the City Council's commitment to addressing the complex issue of houselessness. As a concerned resident, I encourage you to carefully evaluate the potential consequences of allowing individuals to sleep in cars and to engage in a transparent and inclusive dialogue with the community. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to ongoing discussions on this matter. Sincerely, Megan Hamilton Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:44 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997567 IP Address: 209.63.107.46 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:43 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 37 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Tyler Birdsey Email Complete Address 14665 SW Peachtree Drive Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said,we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city:Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools)and home.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:44 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997568 IP Address: 73.164.131.121 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:44 Survey Time: 1 minute, 16 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Patrick Abruzzini Email Complete Address 12370 SW Duchilly Ct. Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Proposal at Christ the King Church Comments Tigard City Council Elected Officials, I recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood I would like to place some specific requests before the Council: *Explore using public property farther away from homes and schools to host Safe Parking projects in Tigard *Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location criteria to limit these projects to locate within a reasonable distance of schools(including daycares and preschools)and homes *All funding decisions for this project should be put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents *Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been approved by the city-post this information publicly for all to access.Thank you for your consideration in this matter Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:48 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997590 IP Address: 50.126.107.121 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:47 Survey Time: 5 minutes, 39 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Xin Dudley Email Complete Address 13139 Sw Summit Ridge St Tigard,Or 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe parking program on Bull Montana rd Comments I strongly oppose to the proposal to put a safe parking location on Bull mountain Road due to the fact it is close to school,weed store right across the street form it, and being so close to residential neighborhood. I think it should be moved to a different location. I am concerned there is no drug test for applicants who are applying for the program, I am also concerned it affecting the property value in the area.As a real estate agent, I know how much it could affect home buyer decisions. I strongly advise the city to not prove this location. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:49 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997599 IP Address: 50.38.48.89 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:49 Survey Time: 2 minutes, 22 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Darrick Purfield Email Complete Address 14535 SW McFarland Blvd Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Homeless Parking in residential area near school and children Comments I am writing today to express my concerns for the proposal to allow houseless vehicles at the church off 114th and Bull Mountain. I live 1/4 mile from the proposed site and have 3 elementary aged children. I love my neighborhood, my neighbors and have deep compassion for those that are less fortunate than myself.While I recognize the need for this program, I do not feel that the proposed location would provide the best service to either the houseless individuals and/or the families in the community.With no drug testing required, allowing participants to qualify with a "non-recent" history of sexual and violent crimes, limited supervision, no services within the immediate area,yet surrounded by residential living(i.e. children everywhere)and a close proximity to several schools,this does not seem like the right location for this project!!As a side not,Just Compassion has stated many times that they do not disclose the location of their parking spots,yet at this point everyone is aware of this location! I would plead for you to consider alternate locations for these types of projects and that any permits for these types of requests require a public/on the record vote!Thank you for taking the time to read my comments. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 9:56 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997629 IP Address: 74.93.49.53 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 9:55 Survey Time: 3 minutes, 18 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Kelly Price Email Complete Address 11532 SW Cole Ln Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said,we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city:Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools)and home.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for-please post Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 10:08 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997674 IP Address: 98.246.185.30 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 10:08 Survey Time: 3 minutes, 38 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Haojie Cui Email Complete Address 12762 Southwest Rocky Mountain CT Tigard,Oregon 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. Comments The current parking lot hosts a preschool for 30 children daily until the end of May,with nearby residents living just feet away.While we understand the program's importance,we urge the city to establish funding criteria for Safe Parking locations near schools and homes to ensure safety.The proposal lacks plans for overnight security, potentially impacting nearby neighborhoods. Our requests to the city are as follows:-Host an Open House Online Forum for ongoing community engagement.Consider public property at safe distances from homes and schools for Safe Parking projects.-Ensure city funding for projects meets location and security criteria, limiting proximity to schools and residential areas.-Require funding decisions for this project to undergo a city council vote for transparency. -Make the permitting process transparent and accessible to the public.We trust the city will prioritize residents' safety in its decision-making process. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 10:14 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997691 IP Address: 98.232.138.81 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 10:14 Survey Time: 38 minutes, 18 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Christine Eykelbosch Email Complete Address 14944 SW 89TH COURT TIGARD,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments Elected City Council Officials, I would like to add my voice to many you have already heard from who have deep safety and security concerns due to the recently proposed Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran in Tigard. I attended the informational meeting hosted at the site a few weeks ago, and despite multiple accounts stating it was"hard to hear the answers due to people talking over one another", I was absolutely able to hear all the responses from the church and program leaders,and I find their answers were severely lacking and quite frankly contradictory when it came to the safety and security of neighbors surrounding this site. Pastor Cottingham said many times during the meeting that the program "would not be safe"to have on site while the preschool was in operation,yet at other times she has said that it would absolutely be safe for the neighbors and young children living nearby.This is a blatant contradiction. Dr Baker stated many times that the program works with those within it to"overcome barriers to housing", and he named some of these barriers to be mental illness and substance abuse. He also made it clear that there are no plans for drug testing for those within the program and there is no onsite security or oversight.After the events that occurred less than two weeks ago in Beaverton near one of the Just Compassion sites, I would hope that our elected leaders can plainly see the possibility for danger that having such services may bring to the surrounding neighbors. By allowing this program at this residential site you are bringing undue risk to those neighbors near the site. Please consider a non-residential site,such as City Hall. This location would have added security as police and fire services are adjacent. I also ask that this decision be decided upon by a council vote so there is transparency in the process,and we can see which city officials are actually representing the people within their community. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images i Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 10:24 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997733 IP Address: 207.173.16.4 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 10:24 Survey Time: 4 minutes, 59 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Theresa Bemis Email Complete Address 12535 SW Grant Ave Portland,OR 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Comments I'm not opposed to the safe parking program-I'm opposed to the lack of security to make it"safe". If there are rules, how will they be enforced?Is there a forum or group for neighbors to submit problems and complaints.Why doesn't the church offer a shelter versus a parking space?If it's only for 3 vehicles I would think the church could make space for 3 families indoors with facilities.And how much tax payer money is being used for this project?Can we please see the accounting and costs? Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 10:49 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997827 IP Address: 73.37.31.48 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 10:49 Survey Time: 3 minutes, 22 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Alexi Reeve Email Complete Address Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking location in Tigard Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials, I recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location. I do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said, i implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city: Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools)and home.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images i Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:00 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997871 IP Address: 50.54.144.24 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 10:59 Survey Time: 9 minutes, 21 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Marsden Smith Email Complete Address 12332 SW Hollow Ln Tigard,OR 972232885 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Homeless Comments You have a Goal regarding Houseless. Is this goal for all houseless or for Tigard residents? Is it to simply provide housing or encourage programs to eliminate conditions that cause the problem? Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:16 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997927 IP Address: 50.126.105.40 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:15 Survey Time: 10 minutes, 31 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Rosalie Francetich Email Complete Address 8790 SW Pinebrook St Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking program Comments Dear Council Members, I respectfully submit a request that the Safe Parking program being considered for the church parking lot near 114th Street be removed as an option due to safety concerns for the neighborhood community surrounding the church.Thank you, Rosalie Francetich Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:17 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997932 IP Address: 50.54.155.166 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:16 Survey Time: You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name James Wilkinson Email Complete Address 15380 SW Bull Mountain Road Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Proposed Safe Park location at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments I attended the information presentation at the church. I was not able to connect in to the subsequent Zoom Meeting. I am a retired Architect living near Bull Mtn Rd &150th. I have a long history of being involved in homeless issues-though mostly in Boston a while ago. I understand the Safe Park program is something the City of Tigard has organized and wishes to proceed with. I am uncomfortable as a planning professional with the idea of dispersing small Safe Park areas through the residential neighborhoods of the city. I understand you disagree.A dispersed pattern of sites leaves me concerned about supervision and the safety of the surround residential areas. I am concerned the program might lead to unexpected outcomes. I would love to volunteer to help with the homeless situation here in Tigard but it is difficult for me to understand how to plug in.Shouldn't that be a priority for the city? How much volunteer potential is going untapped? Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:28 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2997970 IP Address: 50.126.105.40 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:27 Survey Time: 10 minutes,43 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Kerry Francetich Email Complete Address 8790 Sw Pinebrook St Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Proposed Safe Parking Program Comments Dear City Council Members and Mayor Lueb, Please consider giving your full attention to hearing your community and its concerns over the proposed Tigard Safe Parking program that you are considering,especially the one proposed at the Christ the King Lutheran Church on 114th and Bull Mountain Road.This is too residential for housing a project that will attract the homeless to that area even more than it already is.You will put hard-working Tigard residents in harm's way every day and night.Would you like people sleeping in their cars on the other side of your fence? Likely not, so please hear the concerns of these neighbors.And the church said they would not put the program into place until they stopped doing their day care because of the safety risk, but they're willing to risk the safety of their neighbors? Please listen,and find a differently place to test this flawed program. Respectfully Kerry Francetich-Tigard resident of nearly 40 years Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:39 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2998008 IP Address: 107.122.85.26 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:38 Survey Time: 4 minutes, 32 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Kathleen Whitman Email Complete Address 11894 SW Aspen Ridge Dr Portland,Oregon 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program Comments Dear City Council, Homelessness is a crisis. People who still live in their vehicles need a safe place to park. I get it. Christ the King Lutheran Church has offered a place for 3-5 cars with access to portable toilets and washing stations. Good idea except for the location. I believe a designated location nearer to city amenities would be a more ideal way to start this journey. For example,Just Compassion may have 3-5 parking places on their site as well as structured oversight and management of car residents. I understand that it is the goal to move the car residents to apartments or single housing. I urge our government to consider the welfare of people who work to make a living, providing for their families, paying their own expenses and increasing taxes on top of that.We have our own hardships,took jobs we liked and didn't like,worked for a variety of personalities.We struggled and made a decent living.Some of us in our senior years still working.Setting up a campsite near residential neighborhoods is disrespectful and dehumanizing to us. I believe in helping people to help themselves. I have volunteered on such committees in the private sector. I would be happy to assist the city in this endeavor in finding the appropriate location for safe overnight parking. Kind regards, Kathleen Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:46 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2998040 IP Address: 50.126.107.91 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:46 Survey Time: 15 minutes, 16 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Amanda Combs Email Complete Address 8935 SW McDonald St Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Just Compassion EWC,Christ the King Lutheran,City,and Mayor's Proposed Location for Safe Parking Program Comments City Council Elected Officials, I am concerned about the location of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host.This parking lot currently serves a preschool and a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot,or even share a fence line with the proposed location.While I do not dispute the merits of this program, or its intent, I believe this location has been poorly chosen. If the City Council, Mayor Lueb,Just Compassion leadership and Pastor Dorothy wish to, in the words of Mayor Lueb, "support...all 56,000 people who call Tigard home,"then they would listen to the neighbors,the homeowners,the parents of children who call Tigard home and choose a location that would be better for all, not just the houseless individuals who would be sleeping in their cars. I implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The city has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity. I have lived in Tigard for 24 non-consecutive years since 1987 and have personally witnessed many unsafe situations around the Just Compassion center in Tigard (located at 12280 SW Hall Blvd). I implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs. I have the following ask of the city: • Create an Open House Online Forum for Tigard citizens to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. • Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the Safe Parking projects in Tigard. • Ensure funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects being near schools and homes Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:50 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2998062 IP Address: 73.96.138.219 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:49 Survey Time: 1 minute,33 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jack Voorhees Email Complete Address 14336 SW 128th Place Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials,We recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood.This parking lot currently hosts a preschool with 30 children on site daily, 9am-12 through the end of May. In addition, a variety of neighbors live within feet of this parking lot, or even share a fence line with the proposed location.We do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said,we implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe-this proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods.We cannot take the risk of our children and families being exposed to dangerous activity,such as the incident that took place near the Just Compassion shelter in Beaverton recently.We implore city officials to take the safety and security of their constituents seriously as they act in support of these programs.We have the following asks of the city:Create an Open House Online Forum for us to continue to share our voices-we have not been able to fully participate to date. Explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the 3 Safe Parking projects in Tigard. Ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools (including daycares and preschools)and home.We want to see funding decisions for this project put to a city council vote-we want our elected officials to remain transparent and accountable as they work on behalf of their constituents Ensure the permitting process for projects like this are public and available-we want to know the criteria and also be made aware when a permit has been applied for-please post t Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 1 Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:51 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2998069 IP Address: 73.37.31.152 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:50 Survey Time: 9 minutes, 11 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Jan Gould Email Complete Address 14392 SW 128th Place Portland, OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Park Program for Christ the King Lutheran Church Bull Mountain Comments I attended the coffee with the Mayor on Saturday and listened to all the heartfelt comments from residents on Bull Mountain.This is greatly impacting all of us in an emotional,stressful way. Pastor Dorothy said she wanted to be a good neighbor, but she never asked the community and residents directly near the church how they felt about it.Asking how they feel about it would be being a good neighbor.There was also a lady at the coffee who donates to Just Compassion who doesn't feel that is a good place for this proposed parking idea. Let's find a place that would be more acceptable. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:51 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2998070 IP Address: 50.126.107.91 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:51 Survey Time: 38 minutes,4 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Trevor Combs Email Complete Address 8935 SW McDonald St Tigard,Oregon 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Parking Program at Christ the King Lutheran Church Comments Dear City Council Elected Officials, I recently became aware of the proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of the Bull Mountain Neighborhood. I do not dispute the merits of this program,or its intent.That said, I implore the city to implement funding criteria for Safe Parking locations very near schools and homes.The City has a duty to ensure funded projects keep citizens safe.This proposal currently has no plan for overnight security or recourse if overnight parking extends into nearby neighborhoods. It seems to me that the city could still implement this program just at different locations that aren't so close to peoples homes. I ask that the city explore using public property within safe distances from homes and schools for the three Safe Parking projects in Tigard. I also ask that the city ensure any funding provided by the city be met with location and security criteria to limit these projects within a reasonable distance of schools(including daycares and preschools)and homes.Thank you,Trevor Combs Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:55 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2998090 IP Address: 65.155.159.66 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:54 Survey Time: 45 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Gary Kopka Email Complete Address 13525 SW Mountain Ridge Ct Tigard,OR 97224 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Proposed Safe Parking Program that Christ the King Lutheran Church and Just Compassion EWC plan to host at the bottom of our Bull Mountain Neighborhood. Comments As a concerned neighbor in the community, I can appreciate the church's compassionate desire to help those in need. However, I do not understand how it is compassionate to allow someone to sleep in their cars when there are already funded temporary services available, including hotel accommodation.We have all already seen in the local news how other such parking programs in nearby communities are causing safety issues for already existing community members. I highly encourage that, instead,consider utilizing publicly owned property safely distanced from homes, schools and churches.We appreciate the council giving us the opportunity to openly discuss this topic. I ask that we do keep the discussion going, keep it transparent. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:58 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2998101 IP Address: 67.168.248.241 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:58 Survey Time: 6 minutes, 17 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Michael Byers Email Complete Address 13394 SW 161st PI Portland,OR 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) "Safe Parking" program at Lutheran church at 99W and Bull Mtn Rd. Comments We do not want programs that attract homeless people into our neighborhoods.We saw what happened at the Beaverton library recently when one of the homeless that visits Safe Compassion's location on 5th set himself on fire in front of a crowd. Programs that attract the homeless into neighborhoods are not what we should be doing.Our families and children deserve better than choosing to attract the homeless like moths to a flame.Safe Compassion has proven that they cannot control the homeless they are attracting,their people are still using drugs and doing crime,why would we choose to invite them into our neighborhoods? Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2024 11:59 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* City Council Public Comment Form City Council Public Comment Form Submission#: 2998103 IP Address: 50.54.146.103 Submission Date: 02/12/2024 11:59 Survey Time: 49 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Anna Murphy Email Complete Address Tigard,Or Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by Monday at noon) Safe Lots Program Comments Tigard City Council,We continue to have safety concerns about the safe lot program and location in Tigard.While we understand the desire of the city council to achieve its goals around reducing homelessness in our community,there are no mechanisms to ensure the safety of the surrounding community with children and families.We heard from a Tigard business owner at the Meet Up with the Mayor who,for six years, has been dealing with homeless individuals terrorizing his business without being able to obtain help from the city to stop these dangerous events from occurring.This poses an unreasonable safety concern in our community with children and homes present.We ask that the city listen to the safety concerns and requests expressed by residents.Thank you. Attachment Supporting Documents/Images Thank you, City of Tigard This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.F - PUBLIC COMMENT DATE: February 13, 2024 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) This is a City of Tigard public meeting,subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record.The names and cities of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes,which is a public record. Please review the"Tigard City Council Protocol for Public Comment." NAME & CITY YOU LIVE IN TOPIC Please Print Nameta, City 1-v(=IX 2 Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer , i( pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For 0 Against ❑ Neutral 0 Name -,F._V-[,''') /414t(.7P—) Cityf I Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: S-A-47r-c_ T .1.. Po(.-`�^ 4-6-' Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email .4\A ht t�1O' EVO-i k (-NA/1/4Q' : Li)ts^ rFor ❑ Against Neutral ❑ Name IVi \t i3 1 City I( t tiA Please spellbur name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer � �1w pronounce: h * UcCi\-\\-stA Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contactinformation: _.__..._...__..._..__..............._........_..._............_...._.........................._......._........_........... _... Check one: Phone or email VAQ, 1A�11N(l t 1...\,w/ �r. I•ctr For ❑ Against p/ Neutral❑ Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: __..........._,_...._....................._...._ Check one: Phone or email For 0 Against 0 Neutral 0 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.F - PUBLIC COMMENT DATE: February 13, 2024 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record.The names and cities of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes,which is a public record. Please review the"Tigard City Council Protocol for Public Comment." NAME & CITY YOU LIVE IN TOPIC Please Print Name Do� -4e.l ivpsAA City 1 IaC (C -\Gill q\ 1 A- Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiting officer ,,X- pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email CA(COLAYAtln9' @ 't 1 i(.ca 0.1- For ❑ Against ❑ Neutral❑ Mel1Name MOWiSCity tiok.Ps j Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer0 pronounce: ��_e J)6tPY) J ^ � t ryy) Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contactinformation: _........._........................................................................................................................................................... Check one: Phone or email JV l S tiAl(1 I j .L2 3 01 0,4 t ' con For ❑ Against 5(1 Neutral❑ Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check one: Phone or email For ❑ Against ❑ Neutral ❑ Name City Please spell your name as it sounds if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff,please leave your contact information: Check... ko................................... one: Phone or email For ❑ Against 0 Neutral 0 AIS-5425 5.A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/13/2024 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: River Terrace 2.0 Community Planning (Planning Services) Authored By: Toni Riccardi Presented By: Project Manager Schuyler Warren Item Type: Public Hearing Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication 10/30/2023 Date in Newspaper: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract to ECOnorthwest for River Terrace 2.0 Community Planning (Planning Services)? ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board award the contract for River Terrace 2.0 Community Planning (Planning Services) to ECOnorthwest for an estimated amount of$1,251,640 and authorize the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION In October 2021, the City of Tigard submitted an application to Metro for an expansion of the Urban Growth Boundary to include the areas collectively known as River Terrace 2.0. These areas were the subject of the city's River Terrace 2.0 Concept Plan. Metro approved that expansion on February 2, 2023, through a land swap. This decision was acknowledged by the Department of Land Conservation and Development on May 2, 2023. Prior to this, the City had requested grant funding from Metro to complete the Community Plan for River Terrace 2.0. The Council approved an IGA to accept an award of$700,000 from Metro on July 25, 2023. With Council approval, the City also applied for 3 grants from the Department of Land Conservation and Development to support this work. Two of those grants were awarded in the amount of$127,000. One portion of the contract is considered an Additional/Alternative task- development code amendments. This work will be dependent on securing additional outside funding to cover the cost. Currently, the city is waitlisted for a grant to complete this task. DLCD expects that funding will be included in a spending package in the short session of 2024 and the department is also seeking funds from a HUD PRO Housing grant. Additional funding is expected from the Department of Energy to support the climate plan portion of the work in the amount of$118,610. The remainder of the project budget will be covered from the Community Development department's consultant budget across three fiscal years - FY24-26. With funding secured, the city issued a Qualification Based Request for Proposal for the project on October 26, 2023,with notice published in the Daily Journal of Commerce. Upon closing,the city received one proposal. •ECOnorthwest The Contracts team has reviewed the bid and determined that ECOnorthwest has submitted a reasonable bid. ECOnorthwest has no State of Oregon Contractor Construction Board violations and is not on the Bureau of Labor and Industries ineligible list. Accordingly,it is recommended to award for the city's River Terrace 2.0 Community Planning (Planning Services) contract to ECOnorthwest in the amount of $1,251,640. The contract will be a 2 year contract. Attached is the evaluation criteria and score summary. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The Local Contract Review Board may choose to not award this contract and direct staff to resolicit for the work. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Fiscal Impact Cost: 1,251,640 Budgeted (yes or no): yes Where budgeted?: CD consultant budget Additional Fiscal Notes: This is a two-year contract impacting 3 fiscal years. The following grants and IGA's are supporting this project: $700,000 IGA with Metro $127,000 Grant from Department of Land Conservation and Development Additional funding of$118,610 is expected from the Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant The remainder of the contract will be paid for by Community Development's operating budget (General Fund). Attachments Scoring Summary SELECTION AND EVALUATION PROCESS A Selection Committee assembled by the City will review the written proposals. Proposals will be evaluated to determine which ones best meet the needs of the City. After meeting the mandatory requirements, the proposals will be evaluated on their technical aspects. The Selection Committee will select the Proposer which best meets the City's needs based upon its evaluation of a Proposer proposal. Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the following: 1. Completed proposal submitted on time Pass/Fail 2. Transmittal letter Pass/Fail 3. Project Understanding and Approach 35 points 5. Consultant Team Qualifications 25 points 6. Consultant Team Experience with Similar Projects 20 points 7. Project Manager Experience with Similar Projects 10 points 8. Diversity in Contracting 10 points • 5 points for prime or sub-consultant(s)with any COBID certification(DBE,MBE,WBE,SDV, ESB) • 5 points for key project staff diversity • 3 points for prime or sub-consultant(s)with MBE/WBE certification • 2 points for workplace diversity efforts TOTAL EVALUATION POINTS100 POINTS Request for Proposal Evaluation Scoring Summary 2024-08 River Terrace 2.0 Community Planning (Planning Services) EVALUATION SUMMARY U) a, t Evaluation Criteria a' 'm O U W Proposer Required P/F Information 2 Project Understanding and 90 Approach 3 Consultant Team 65 Qualifications Consultant Team 4 Experience with Similar 51 Projects • Project Manager 5 Experience with Similar 24 Projects 6 Diversity in Contracting 30 20 7 Total 300 250 AIS-5429 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/13/2024 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: FY24 BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST #2 Authored By: Kalena Plath Presented By: Kalena Plath, Budget Manager Item Type: Resolution Public Hearing Public Hearing Yes Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: 02/08/2024 Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Presenting the FY 2024_2 Budget Supplemental to the City Council for review and adoption. ACTION REQUESTED Finance recommends the City Council adopt the FY 2024_2 Budget Supplemental. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations 01/09/2024- Staff provided project update on the Electric Mobility and Curbside Management Strategy Project. 02/06/2024- Council provided recommendation to move forward with drone display. Public Involvement Impacts (Community, Budget, Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) The following is the summary of items that require council action for FY 2024_2 Budget Supplemental: New Requests:(these were unforeseen at the time of budget adoption) Electric Mobility and Curbside Management Strategy—The City has entered into an intergovernmental agreement for a grant to support equitable transportation electrification and effective management of the curb throughout the City. Project total is $166,650,with grant funds from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM), a joint program of ODOT and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development of$110,000 and Tigard portion being$56,650. ($166,650) Tigard 4th of July Drone Display—In response to the request to review options to celebrate July 4 with a drone light show, City teammates researched and brought forth to Council on Feb 6th an option to provide the community with a Fourth of July drone display. ($80,000) ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION Do not adopt the FY 2024_2 Budget Supplemental,which would restrict these projects from moving forward. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Fiscal Impact Cost: 136,650 Budgeted (yes or no): No Where Budgeted (department/program): N/A Additional Fiscal Notes: This FY 2024_2 Budget Supplemental will increase the overall city budget by$136,650 across 2 funds. The increase in the expenditures will be funded by currently available fund balances and will result in a reduction of the reserves for future expenditures,which carry into the next year. Please refer to the exhibits which summarize the fiscal impact of the quarterly supplemental budget by fund. Cost: 326,650 Budgeted (yes or no): No Where Budgeted (department/program): N/A Additional Fiscal Notes: This FY 2024_2 Budget Supplemental will increase the overall city budget by$326,650 across 3 funds. $80,000 is shown in both the General Fund and as a transfer from Transient Lodging-which will provide the transfer as revenue to the General Fund. The increase in the expenditures will be funded by currently available fund balances and will result in a reduction of the reserves for future expenditures,which carry into the next year. Please refer to the exhibits which summarize the fiscal impact of the quarterly supplemental budget by fund. Attachments Exhibit A- FY24_2 Budget Appropriations Resolution FY24_2 Exhibit A ADJUSTED APPROPRIATIONS 2/13/2024 Fund Program Adopted Item Request 3 Revised Budget General Fund Electric Mobility and Curbside Management- 5 Investment& Infrastructure 6,307,632 Grant Funded 110,000 6,417,632 Tigard 4th of July Drone 4 Engagement& Innovation 9,296,397 Display 80,000 9,376,397 TOTAL 43,171,268 $ 190,000 44,795,768 Transportation TNC Fund Electric Mobility and Curbside Management- 5 Investment& Infrastructure 0 City Match portion 56,650 56,650 TOTAL N/C $ 56,650 56,650 Transient Lodging Tax Fund Transfer for Tigard 4th 8 Transfer 192,111 of July Drone Display 80,000 272,111 TOTAL 192,111 $ 80,000 272,111 TOTAL BY PROGRAM 4 Engagement& Innovation 26,758,723 80,000 27,088,723 5 Investment& Infrastructure 56,859,270 166,650 57,025,920 8 Transfer 85,506,227 80,000 89,907,032 TOTAL 294,481,202 $ 326,650 $ 304,397,357 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 24- A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE FY 2024_2 BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL. WHEREAS,the city acknowledges those items that were unknown at the time the FY 2024 budget was adopted; and WHEREAS,the city recognizes approximately$326,650 of unanticipated budget in operations and transfers;and WHEREAS, the increase in budget is funded by current fund balance and will therefore reduce the reserve for future expenditures. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The FY 2023-24 Budget is hereby amended as detailed in Exhibit A. SECTION: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2024. Mayor- City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 24- Page 1 AIS-5430 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/13/2024 Length (in minutes):20 Minutes Agenda Title: Budget Supplemental Process Discussion Authored By: Kalena Plath Presented By: Kalena Plath, Budget Manager Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Presenting the Updated Budget Supplemental Process ACTION REQUESTED Approve the proposed process for budget supplemental requests. BACKGROUND INFORMATION To be more responsive, fiscally transparent and improve efficiencies, Finance has updated the Budget Supplemental Process. The current process is to bring forward to Council any budgetary amendments (budget supplemental requests) on a scheduled quarterly basis. The largest of these requests typically occurs during the first quarter of the fiscal year and typically includes any previous fiscal year projects that were unable to be completed prior to the end of the fiscal year and new unforeseen items that came after the budget had been adopted. Uncompleted projects are typically due to delays, conflicting priorities, and other issues. All other unexpected and unforeseen requests are held until the next quarterly supplemental request. This process has worked for many years. However,it creates many items per request, duplicates the review of action items that Council has already approved, and creates a large amount of work in a short period of time for staff. In some cases, department staff are unable to begin work on a new project that has been approved by Council if it went before Council prior to the budget being appropriated. Finance has developed a new ad-hoc process to alleviate these issues. The first quarterly supplemental budget process would still stay the same. However, after the first quarter when a new item goes to Council for action,it will include the budget supplemental request at the same time. Council will be able to review both the proposed item and the budget appropriation request together. City departments are in support of this new process,which is more responsive to their needs and requires less work on multiple budget requests at one time. This new process conforms with Oregon Budget Law ORS 294.471. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION Council may choose to direct staff to revert to the prior budget supplemental process. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Attachments Budget Supplemental Process Presentation — Budget Supplemental Process Update ---=-=-_ __ ' a►� /�1 \� --- CITY OF lir:, • Tigard ___ V"--Nr4;44tilMr_ i ____- tt---11-----_ -----_-_ : -7,__- , - __-- ._____-__ --______4___-_____-___ .., ____ _ _ ___ . __ _ -_____ -1_7— i—71_ III 414, PSP // k __--�~ _ I / Y ' L 'V ) by o _.- -'crr :l.r. 4R ✓, - .�_ 41 , 4 February 13, 2024 TIGARD — Overview of Current Budget Supplemental Process • Finance has brought forth Budget Supplemental requests on a timed quarterly basis. • Departments submit requests to Finance for inclusion each qtr. • Typically, a large number of requests and information coming to Council at one time. — Overview of New Budget Supplemental Process • Quarter 1 : Requests that are carry-forwards from the previous budget year and new requests that were unforeseen at the time of the budget proposal and adoption . This process is not a change. • During the rest of the year: Finance will work with requesting departments to coordinate Budget Supplemental requests to coincide with the department's council action . This ad-hoc method will allow for budget supplemental appropriations to come before Council at the same time without the need to wait until the next scheduled quarterly supplemental . _ — Overview of New Budget Supplemental Process • Agenda items will include both the departmental action item and the budgetary supplemental data and resolution . • This will provide faster implementation and increased fiscal transparency. AIS-5390 8. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/13/2024 Length (in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Renewal Levy- Second Discussion of Ballot Title and Referral Authored By: Shelby Rihala Presented By: City Attorney Rihala Item Type: Motion Requested Resolution Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Consideration of ballot tide for public safety renewal levy. ACTION REQUESTED Staff requests Council adopt the ballot tide referring the public safety renewal levy to the May 21, 2024 ballot. BACKGROUND INFORMATION At its meeting on January 23,2024, Council provided high level direction of key themes and messages for the ballot tide for the public safety renewal levy. Councilors provided additional comments individually to the city attorney and Council discussed all those comments received at its meeting on February 6, 2024. Council's direction was incorporated into the ballot tide that Council is considering tonight. Tonight's action would adopt the ballot tide for the public safety renewal levy and direct the City elections officer to take steps necessary to place this proposed measure on the May 21,2024 ballot. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION Council could provide additional guidance on the proposed ballot title and return on February 20, 2024 for action. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Attachments Resolution Exhibit A SEL 805 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 24- A RESOLUTION APPROVING REFERRAL TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD AT THE MAY 21, 2024 PRIMARY ELECTION, THE QUESTION OF WHETHER TO RENEW THE PUBLIC SAFETY LOCAL OPTION T EVY WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council has determined that the voters of the City of Tigard should be asked to vote on a five-year local option renewal levy, continuing the rate of $0.29 per $1,000 of assessed value, beginning July 1, 2025; and WHEREAS, the proposed renewal levy would continue funding eight patrol officers, one school resource officer, and providing advanced de-escalation training for all sworn officers in the department. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: An election is called in the City of Tigard for the purpose of submitting to the legal voters of the City a five-year local option renewal levy at the continued rate of$0.29 per$1,000 of assessed value,beginning July 1, 2025. The ballot title to appear on the ballot is attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. SECTION 2: Election Conducted by Mail. The measure election shall be held on Tuesday,May 21, 2024. The precinct for the election shall be all of the territory within the corporate limits of the City of Tigard. As required by ORS 254.465 and ORS 254.470, the measure election will be conducted by mail by the Washington County Elections Department, according to the procedures adopted by the Oregon Secretary of State. SECTION 3: Notice of Ballot Title. The City Elections Officer is directed to publish notice of receipt of the ballot title in the Tigard Times or The Oregonian in compliance with ORS 250.275(5). SECTION 4: Ballot Title. Pursuant to ORS 250.285 and ORS 254.095, the Tigard City Council directs the City Elections Officer to file a Notice of City Measure Election in substantially the form of Exhibit 2,with the Washington County Elections Office, unless,pursuant to a valid ballot title challenge, the Tigard City Council certifies a different Notice of City Measure Election be filed, such filing shall occur no earlier than the eighth business day after the date on which Exhibit 2 is filed with the City Elections Officer and not later than March 21, 2024. SECTION 5: Explanatory Statement. Pursuant to ORS 251.345, the Tigard City Council directs the City Manager to prepare a Measure Explanatory Statement for publication in the county voters' pamphlet; said statement shall be filed with the Washington County Elections Office at the same time the Notice of City Measure Election is filed by the City Elections Officer. SECTION 6: Delegation. The Tigard City Council authorizes the City Manager or a designee of the City Manager to act on behalf of the City of Tigard and to take such further action as is necessary to carry out the intent and purposes herein in compliance with the applicable provisions of law. SECTION 7: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. RESOLUTION NO. 24- Page 1 PASSED: This day of 2024. Mayor- City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 24- Page 2 Exhibit A Caption: Renewal of Local Option Levy to Maintain Public Safety Services. Question: Shall Tigard renew the operating levy of$0.29 per $1,000 for public safety services for five years beginning 2025?This measure renews current local option taxes. Summary: This measure renews the existing public safety and police services levy that expires June 2025. The original levy paid for 8 patrol officers and 1 school resource officer. The addition of these officers allowed an increase in minimum patrol staffing for the first time in over 25 years. Passage of the renewal levy would continue these investments,including: • Retaining 8 patrol officers to respond to increased calls for service, multiple emergencies at the same time, and community patrols. • Maintaining 1 existing school resource officer to enhance student safety. • Continuing training for all sworn officers in advanced crisis intervention and de-escalation to address increased mental health crises. Because this is a renewal,passage of this measure would not increase the current tax rate of$0.29 per$1,000 of assessed value. The cost of this levy on a typical Tigard home with an assessed value of$318,440 ($542,750 market value) would be $92.35 per year, or$7.70 per month. Estimated revenues for each year of the levy: 2025-26: $2,500,000 2026-27: $2,600,000 2027-28: $2,710,000 2028-29: $2,820,000 2029-30: $2,930,000 Request for Ballot Title SEL 805 rev 08/21 Preparation or Publication of Notice OAR 165-014-0005 No later than the 81st day before an election,a governing body that has referred a measure must prepare and file with the local elections official the text of the referral for ballot title preparation or the ballot title for publication of notice of receipt of ballot title. This form may be used to file the text of the referral and request the elections official begin the ballot title drafting process or file a ballot title and request the elections official publish notice of receipt of ballot title. Filing Information Election Date Authorized Official May 21, 2024 Carol Krager Contact Phone Email Address 503-718-2419 carolk@tigard-or.gov Referral Information Title, Number or other Identifier This Filing is For n Drafting of Ballot Title Attach referral text. n Publication of Notice Ballot title below. Ballot Title Additional requirements may apply Caption 10 words which reasonably identifies the subject of the measure. Renewal of Local Option Levy To Maintain Public Safety Services. Question 20 words which plainly phrases the chief purpose of the measure. Shall Tigard renew the operating levy of$0.29 per $1,000 for public safety services for five years beginning 2025?This measure renews current local option taxes. Summary 175 words which concisely and impartially summarizes the measure and its major effect. This measure renews the existing public safety and police services levy that expires June 2025.The original levy paid for 8 patrol officers and 1 school resource officer. The addition of these officers allowed an increase in minimum patrol staffing for the first time in over 25 years. Passage of the renewal levy would continue these investments,including: • Retaining 8 patrol officers to respond to increased calls for service,multiple emergencies at the same time,and community patrols. • Maintaining 1 existing school resource officer to enhance student safety. • Continuing training for all sworn officers in advanced crisis intervention and de-escalation to address increased mental health crises. Because this is a renewal,passage of this measure would not increase the current tax rate of$0.29 per$1,000 of assessed value. The cost of this levy on a typical Tigard home with an assessed value of$318,440($542,750 market value)would be$92.35 per year,or$7.70 per month. Estimated revenues for each year of the levy: 2025-26:$2,500,000 2026-27:$2,600,000 2027-28:$2,710,000 2028-29:$2,820,000 2029-30:$2,930,000 By signing this document: 4 I hereby state that I am authorized by the county or city governing body, or district elections authority to submit this Request for Ballot Title—Preparation or Publication of Notice. Signature Date Signed AIS-5391 9. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/13/2024 Length (in minutes):20 Minutes Agenda Title: Charter Amendment- Second Discussion of Ballot Title and Referral Authored By: Kathy Nyland Presented By: City Attorney Rihala Item Type: Motion Requested Resolution Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Consideration of ballot tide for City Charter amendment. ACTION REQUESTED Staff requests Council adopt the ballot tide referring the Charter amendment to the May 21, 2024 ballot. BACKGROUND INFORMATION At its meeting on January 23,2024, Council provided high level direction of key themes and messages for the ballot tide for the proposed Charter amendment. Councilors provided additional comments individually to the city attorney and Council discussed each of those comments received at its meeting on February 6, 2024. Direction from that meeting was incorporated into the ballot tide that Council is considering tonight. Tonight's action would adopt the ballot tide for the proposed Charter amendment and direct the City elections officer to take steps necessary to place this proposed measure on the May 21, 2024 ballot. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION Council could provide additional guidance on the proposed ballot titles and return on February 20, 2024 for action. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Attachments Resolution Exhibit A Charter- Final- Exhibit B SEL 805 CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 24- A RESOLUTION APPROVING REFERRAL TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF TIGARD AT THE MAY 21, 2024 PRIMARY ET.FCTION, THE QUESTION OF WHETHER TO ADOPT A NEW CITY CHARTER WHEREAS,the City's Charter,a document that lays out the organization,powers, functions, and procedures of the city government–has not been comprehensively reviewed and amended since it was adopted in 1962; and WHEREAS,in 2023,the City convened the Charter Review Committee—a group of 14 community members who met over the course of 8 months—to holistically review the City's Charter and make recommendations to City Council; and WHEREAS, the Charter Committee proposed a revised Charter making numerous changes, including expanding City Council from five to seven members; updating term limits, setting term limits as two consecutive terms as Councilor and two consecutive terms as Mayor, for a total of no more than four consecutive terms;and raising the threshold for future Charter changes by initiative; and WHEREAS,the City Council wishes to submit to the voters a ballot measure proposing a new City Charter. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: An election is called in the City of Tigard for the purpose of submitting to the legal voters of the City a measure adopting a new Charter for the City of Tigard. The ballot title to appear on the ballot is attached and incorporated as Exhibit A. SECTION 2: The proposed Charter that is the subject of this referral is set forth in full in the attached Exhibit B. SECTION 3: Election Conducted by Mail. The measure election shall be held on Tuesday,May 21, 2024. The precinct for the election shall be all of the territory within the corporate limits of the City of Tigard. As required by ORS 254.465 and ORS 254.470, the measure election will be conducted by mail by the Washington County Elections Department, according to the procedures adopted by the Oregon Secretary of State. SECTION 4: Notice of Ballot Title. The City Elections Officer is directed to publish notice of receipt of the ballot title in the Tigard Times or The Oregonian in compliance with ORS 250.275(5). SECTION 5: Ballot Title. Pursuant to ORS 250.285 and ORS 254.095, the Tigard City Council directs the City Elections Officer to file a Notice of City Measure Election in substantially the form of Exhibit C,with the Washington County Elections Office, unless,pursuant to a valid ballot title challenge, the Tigard City Council certifies a different Notice of City Measure Election be filed, such filing shall occur no earlier than the eighth business day after the date on which Exhibit C is filed with the City Elections Officer and not later than March 21, 2024. SECTION 6: Explanatory Statement. Pursuant to ORS 251.345, the Tigard City Council directs the City RESOLUTION NO. 24- Page 1 Manager to prepare a Measure Explanatory Statement for publication in the county voters' pamphlet; said statement shall be filed with the Washington County Elections Office at the same time the Notice of City Measure Election is filed by the City Elections Officer. SECTION 7: Delegation. The Tigard City Council authorizes the City Manager or a designee of the City Manager to act on behalf of the City of Tigard and to take such further action as is necessary to carry out the intent and purposes herein in compliance with the applicable provisions of law. SECTION 8: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2024. Mayor- City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 24- Page 2 Exhibit A Caption: Adopts New Charter for Tigard City Government Question: Shall Tigard adopt a new City Charter that retains current form of government, adds two Councilors, and amends term limits? Summary: In 2023, the City conducted the first comprehensive review and update to Tigard's City Charter since it was adopted in 1962. The City convened a community-led process to review the Charter and develop recommendations. For 8 months, the 14-person Charter Review Committee studied city charters from around the state, state and local laws, and other resources to propose changes for Tigard's City Charter. The committee ultimately proposed a revised Charter. Key proposed changes include: • Expanding City Council from five to seven members. • Updating term limits, setting term limits as two consecutive terms as Councilor and two consecutive terms as Mayor, for a total of no more than four consecutive terms. • Raising the threshold for future Charter changes by initiative. Other changes would include deferring to state law on areas such as public meetings and elections. The new charter would keep Tigard's same form of government. Elected officials would be elected in the same manner, and laws would be passed in the same way as today. This measure would not increase Tigard's tax rate. Exhibit B City of Tigard Charter of 2024 PREAMBLE We the people of Tigard, Oregon, are a community that recognizes the value of all individuals. We exercise our power to the fullest extent possible under the constitution and laws of the State of Oregon and enact this home rule Charter. ARTICLE I Name and Boundaries Section 1.1. Title of Enactment. This enactment may be referred to as the City of Tigard Charter of 2024. Section 1.2. Name. The municipality of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon, continues to be a municipal corporation with the name "City of Tigard." Section 1.3. Boundaries. The City includes all territory within its boundaries as they now exist or are legally modified in the future. ARTICLE 2 Powers of the City Section 2.1. Powers of the City. The City has all powers expressly or impliedly granted or allowed by the constitutions, statutes, and common law of the United States and State of Oregon as fully as if this Charter specifically enumerated each of those powers. Section 2.2. Construction. This Charter is liberally construed so that the City may exercise fully all powers possible under this Charter and under United States and Oregon law. Section 2.3. Where Powers Vest. All powers of the City are vested in the City Council, except as otherwise provided by law or this Charter. ARTICLE 3 Council Section 3.1. Council Composition. The Council is comprised of a Mayor and six Councilors nominated and elected from the City at-large. Section 3.2. Oath. Before carrying out the duties of office, the Mayor and each Councilor must subscribe and swear or affirm an oath to the effect that the person will faithfully discharge to City of Tigard Charter of 2024 1 the best of the person's ability the duties of the office being assumed and will support the constitutions and laws of the United States and the State of Oregon and the charter and ordinances of the City of Tigard. The oath must be administered and attested to by a notary public or other person duly authorized to administer oaths. The oath may be taken up to 30 days prior to the scheduled date of assuming office. Section 3.3. Mayor. Except as otherwise provided in this Charter, the Mayor is the elected, public policy head of City government. The Mayor is a voting member of Council and has no veto authority. In exercising the powers of the Mayor, the Mayor: a) Has authority over the agenda for Council meetings. b) Presides over and facilitates Council meetings as the chair, preserves order, enforces Council rules, and determines the order of business. c) Signs the authorized writings and records of Council decisions. d) Appoints members of City boards and committees, as provided by Council rules. Section 3.4. Council President. Council will elect a Council President at its first meeting each year. The Council President will perform the duties of the office of Mayor in the Mayor's absence and may perform other duties of the Mayor at the Mayor's request. In the event the Mayor is unavailable to serve, the Council President will serve as the Mayor Pro Tempore. If the Council President vacates the position, the Council will elect a Council President to serve in that position until the next Council President is elected pursuant to this Section. Section 3.5. Terms. The Mayor and each Councilor's term of office is four years and commences on the first day of January after the election to office. One of the new positions created by this 2024 Charter will be elected to a four-year term and the other to a two-year term in the 2024 general election. Council members currently serving at the time this 2024 Charter is adopted will continue to serve the remainder of their terms. Section 3.6 Term Limits. A Mayor may not be elected or appointed to more than two consecutive terms, and a Councilor may not be elected or appointed to more than two consecutive terms, for a total of no more than four consecutive terms on Council. A partial term only applies to a Council member's term limit calculation if the Council member is elected or appointed to a term greater than three years. Terms are considered "consecutive" if there is less than a two-year break from the date last in office to the first date of the Council member's next term. Section 3.7. No Interference. No Council member may directly or indirectly coerce or attempt to coerce the City Manager, City Attorney, or Municipal Court Judge, or a candidate for the office of City Manager, City Attorney, or Municipal Court Judge, in the appointment or removal of a City employee, in an administrative decision of the officer, or in otherwise executing the officer's powers and duties. Council will determine the appropriate penalty for violation of this prohibition, up to and including removal from office. A due process hearing of the full City Council and a unanimous vote of all Council members, with the exception of the member who City of Tigard Charter of 2024 2 is the subject of the vote, is required to remove a Council member. A majority vote of Council is required to impose any other penalty. In Council meetings, Council members may discuss or suggest matters with the officer relating to City business. Section 3.8. Council Rules. Every two years, Council will adopt ground rules by resolution. Ground rules will include a code of conduct, process for the selection of board and committee members, and will govern proceedings of the Council where they do not conflict with law or the provisions of this Charter. Council will determine, by majority vote, the appropriate penalty for a violation of the ground rules, up to and including a resolution of censure and removal from Council assignments. A violation of the ground rules will not be considered a basis for challenging the validity of any Council decision. Section 3.9. Compensation. The Council will adopt, by resolution or ordinance, an independent review process for determining the compensation of the Mayor and Councilors. ARTICLE 4 City Officers This Charter establishes three City offices appointed and removed by a majority of Council—a City Manager, a City Attorney, and Municipal Court Judge. No member of Council may assign or direct the work of any of the following offices: Section 4.1. City Manager. The City Manager is the administrative head of the City government. The City Manager is responsible to the City Council for the proper leadership and administration of all City business including serving as the Budget Officer; appointing and removing all City employees except the Municipal Court Judge and City Attorney; organizing departments; and carrying out all City operations, policies, resolutions, and ordinances. Section 4.2. City Attorney. The City Attorney is the chief legal officer for the City. The City Attorney must be an active member in good standing of the Oregon State Bar. The City Attorney appoints, manages, and may remove any employees who work exclusively in and for the City Attorney's office. Section 4.3. Municipal Court and Judges. The Tigard Municipal Court is established and continues to operate as the City's Municipal Court. a) All areas within the City and areas outside the City as permitted by state law are within the territorial jurisdiction of the court. The Municipal Court has subject matter jurisdiction over every offense created by City ordinance and to the fullest extent allowed by law over all misdemeanors and violations defined and made punishable under state law, unless limited by City ordinance. b) All municipal court judges, including judges pro tempore, must be active members in good standing of the Oregon State Bar. The Presiding Judge exercises general supervision over the judicial functions of the Municipal Court and its judges and has authority over the dockets and assignment of cases. City of Tigard Charter of 2024 3 ARTICLE 5 Elections Section 5.1. City Elections. City elections must conform to state law, unless this Charter or City ordinances provide otherwise. All elections for City offices are nonpartisan. Section 5.2. Qualification of Electors. Every person who is a resident of the City and who qualifies as a legal voter under state law may vote in a City election. Section 5.3. Eligibility. Each member of Council must be a qualified elector under state law, registered to vote in the City of Tigard, and have continuously resided within the City for at least one year immediately before the date of election or appointment to office. Except when a state trial court has jurisdiction over the matter, the Council is the final judge of the election and eligibility of its members. Section 5.4. Conduct of Election. Elections to the office of Mayor and Councilor will be held at the general election, except as otherwise provided by this Charter for special elections to fill vacancies. The candidate receiving the highest number of votes for the office of Mayor is elected to the office. The three candidates receiving the highest number of votes for the office of Councilor are elected to the office. If a Council position for less than a full four-year term is on the ballot, the candidate receiving the highest number of votes for that position is elected to the office. Section 5.5. Vacancies in Office. The office of Mayor or Councilor becomes vacant upon the Mayor or Councilor's: a) Death; b) Resignation from the office; c) Recall from office; d) Ceasing to reside in the city; e) Ceasing to be a qualified elector under state law or this Charter; f) Adjudicated incompetence; g) Conviction of a felony; h) Absence for 30 days from regular meetings of the Council without the consent of the Council and upon a declaration of vacancy approved by unanimous vote of all Council members except the member who is subject of the vote; or i) Removal pursuant to Section 3.7 of this Charter. Section 5.6. Filling Vacancies. In the event the office of Mayor or Councilor becomes vacant before the normal expiration of the term, the Council may fill the vacancy for the remainder of the term by election or appointment. A special election may only be called if the election will be held at least one year before the term would otherwise expire. City of Tigard Charter of 2024 4 ARTICLE 6 Council Meetings; Ordinances Section 6.1. Rules and Meetings. The Council may adopt rules regarding Council meetings to the extent the rules do not conflict with law or this Charter. The Council will meet at a time and place designated by its rules and may meet at other times in accordance with its rules and state law. Section 6.2. Quorum. A majority of the Council members is a quorum to conduct business. In the event of a vacancy pursuant to Section 5.5 of this Charter, or loss of contact during a state or federal state of emergency within the City, the quorum is reduced accordingly. Every Council member who is present must be counted for the purpose of constituting a quorum, even if the Council member does not vote on one or more issues. Section 6.3. Record of Proceedings. A record of Council meetings must be kept in a manner prescribed by state law and the Council's rules. Section 6.4. Voting. Except as otherwise provided in this Charter, the express approval of a majority of the Council members present and voting is necessary for any Council decision. Section 6.5. Ordaining Clause. The council exercises its legislative authority by adopting ordinances. The enacting clause for all ordinances must state "The City of Tigard ordains as follows:" Section 6.6. Adoption. Adoption of an ordinance requires: a) A duly noticed public hearing on the ordinance; b) Reading the ordinance, by title only, in an open Council meeting; and c) A roll call vote whether to adopt the ordinance. Section 6.7. Record of Vote. After the adoption of an ordinance: a) The Mayor must sign the ordinance; and b) The City Recorder must attest to the adoption and date of adoption of the ordinance and enter into the Council minutes the vote of each member of Council on the ordinance. Section 6.8. Effective Date of Ordinances. Ordinances normally take effect on the 30th day after adoption or on a later day provided in the ordinance. An ordinance may take effect as soon as adopted or on another date less than 30 days after adoption if the ordinance contains an emergency clause. City of Tigard Charter of 2024 5 ARTICLE 7 Public Improvements; Debt Section 7.1 Improvements. The procedure for making, altering, vacating, or abandoning a public improvement will be governed by state law. Section 7.2 Special Assessments. The procedure for levying, collecting, and enforcing special assessments for public improvements or other services charged against real property will be governed by ordinance. Section 7.3 Debt Limit. City indebtedness may not exceed debt limits imposed by state law. ARTICLE 8 Miscellaneous Provisions Section 8.1. Ordinance Continuation. All ordinances and other enactments consistent with this Charter, and in force when this Charter takes effect, remain in effect until amended or repealed. Section 8.2. Pending Matters. All rights, claims, causes of actions, duties, contracts, and legal administrative proceedings that exist when this Charter takes effect continue and are unimpaired by this Charter, except as modified pursuant to the provisions of this Charter, and in each case will be maintained, carried on, or dealt with by the City department, office, or agency appropriate under this Charter. Section 8.3. Severability. The terms of this Charter are severable. If any provision of this Charter is held invalid by a court, the invalidity does not affect the validity of the remaining parts of the Charter. Section 8.4. Time of Effect. This Charter takes effect 30 days after the day on which it is approved by a majority of voters, and except as otherwise provided is operative July 1, 2024. The City may take any action before this Charter's operative date that is necessary to enable the City on or after the operative date to exercise all duties, functions, and powers conferred on the City by this Charter. Section 8.5. Saving Clause. All Charter provisions adopted before this Charter takes effect continue in force and effect until repealed. Section 8.6. Amendments. Amendments to this Charter proposed by initiative must be held at a primary or general election. Section 8.7. Repeal. All Charter provisions adopted before this Charter takes effect are repealed when this Charter becomes operative on July 1, 2024. City of Tigard Charter of 2024 6 Request for Ballot Title SEL 805 rev OS/21 Preparation or Publication of Notice OAR 165-014-0005 No later than the 81st day before an election,a governing body that has referred a measure must prepare and file with the local elections official the text of the referral for ballot title preparation or the ballot title for publication of notice of receipt of ballot title. This form may be used to file the text of the referral and request the elections official begin the ballot title drafting process or file a ballot title and request the elections official publish notice of receipt of ballot title. Filing Information Election Date Authorized Official May 21, 2024 Carol Krager Contact Phone Email Address 503-718-2419 carolk@tigard-or.gov Referral Information Title, Number or other Identifier This Filing is For n Drafting of Ballot Title Attach referral text. n Publication of Notice Ballot title below. Ballot Title Additional requirements may apply Caption 10 words which reasonably identifies the subject of the measure. Adopts New Charter for Tigard City Government Question 20 words which plainly phrases the chief purpose of the measure. Shall Tigard adopt a new City Charter that retains current form of government, adds two Councilors, and amends term limits? Summary 175 words which concisely and impartially summarizes the measure and its major effect. In 2023,the City conducted the first comprehensive review and update to Tigard's City Charter since it was adopted in 1962. The City convened a community-led process to review the Charter and develop recommendations. For 8 months,the 14-person Charter Review Committee studied city charters from around the state,state and local laws,and other resources to propose changes for Tigard's City Charter. The committee ultimately proposed a revised Charter. Key proposed changes include: • Expanding City Council from five to seven members. • Updating term limits, setting term limits as two consecutive terms as Councilor and two consecutive terms as Mayor,for a total of no more than four consecutive terms. •Raising the threshold for future Charter changes by initiative. Other changes would include deferring to state law on areas such as public meetings and elections. The new charter would keep Tigard's same form of government. Elected officials would be elected in the same manner,and laws would be passed in the same way as today. This measure would not increase Tigard's tax rate. By signing this document: 4 I hereby state that I am authorized by the county or city governing body, or district elections authority to submit this Request for Ballot Title—Preparation or Publication of Notice. Signature Date Signed AIS-5417 10. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/13/2024 Length (in minutes):40 Minutes Agenda Title: Hall Boulevard Corridor Concept Final Report Authored By: Dave Roth Presented By: Dave Roth,Principal Transportation Planner Item Type: Motion Requested Resolution Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Adopt the Hall Boulevard Corridor Concept Design Report (CDR) to establish community and city priorities for future roadway investments and improvements ACTION REQUESTED Tigard teammates recommend adoption of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Concept Design Report. BACKGROUND INFORMATION For several years, the City of Tigard has considered what it would mean to take ownership over the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)-owned and -operated three-mile segment of SW Hall Boulevard (OR-141) between SW Locust St. and SW Durham St. through a process known as Jurisdictional Transfer. This would transfer ownership and maintenance responsibility to the city in perpetuity. Representing a significant milestone in this ongoing effort, the Hall Boulevard Corridor Concept Design Report (CDR) documents the results of a robust year-long community engagement process in which community members identified a range of needed upgrades and safety improvements to make Hall Boulevard safe and functional for all, regardless of age, ability, or mode of travel. The CDR builds on previous work,including: •2016: Hall Boulevard Condition Assessment Report •2020: Revised Hall Boulevard Condition Assessment Report •2020: Tigard-ODOT Memorandum of Understanding and Shared Work Plan •2022: Revised Tigard-ODOT Memorandum of Understanding and Shared Work Plan •2023: Adoption of 2023-25 Tigard Council Goals (Strategy 4.1: Identify& secure funding to complete the Hall Boulevard jurisdictional transfer) •2023: Hall Boulevard State of Good Repair Report •2023: Passage of House Bill 2793 establishing the State Jurisdictional Transfer Advisory Committee The Hall Boulevard Corridor CDR sets the future vision for SW Hall Boulevard within Tigard and forms the basis on which future detailed design and engineering decisions will be made in advance of roadway construction. Further, adoption of the CDR allows Tigard teammates to fulfill a specific requirement defined in House Bill 2793: to submit a"Community Vision Plan" for the future use of a facility under consideration for transfer in ownership from the state to a local agency. Implementation of the overarching vision and the 31 CDR recommended upgrades and safety improvements will typically occur in one of three ways over time, though any such implementation requires completion of a jurisdictional transfer from the state before these are advanced. •First, as development and redevelopment of parcels with frontage on Hall Boulevard occurs, individual projects will be required to provide proportional infrastructure improvements as determined through the land use approval process. •Second,improvements will occur incrementally as planned projects identified in the 2040 Transportation System Plan (TSP) and the city's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) are completed. •Finally,larger corridor-scale improvement projects would be funded and implemented by the securing of external state and/or federal funding sources. With the passage of House Bill 2793, the newly formed Jurisdictional Transfer Advisory Committee will review applications for highway transfers every other year. During even-numbered years starting in September 2024, the committee will recommend three transfers for funding to the Joint Committee on Transportation. With the Hall Boulevard visioning process now complete,Tigard teammates will continue working toward an application for state funding to complete the needed state of good repair and safety improvements as recommended in the CDR to facilitate the transfer of ownership of Hall Boulevard to the city. The scope and scale of proposed improvements will be determined through continued negotiations with the Oregon Department of Transportation. Additional steps to be taken at a future date after the CDR is adopted include: •Amendments to the Tigard 2040 Transportation System Plan to add CDR-recommended projects, •Amendments to Tigard's Community Development Code (Chapter 18.910.030) to make roadway cross-section and right-of-way requirements consistent with the CDR, and •Prepare and submit an application for transfer. Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations •October 20, 2020: Council Briefing: Hall Boulevard Jurisdictional Transfer •July 11, 2023: Council Briefing: Hall Boulevard Draft Concept Design Report Briefing Public Involvement •May 4, 2022: Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) Meeting •May 4, 2022: Hall Boulevard walking tour •Fall 2022: Corridor vision stakeholder meetings (3) •November 16, 2022: First corridor vision public open house and online survey •April 5,2023: TTAC Meeting •April 6,2023: Second corridor vision public open house and online survey •October 30, 2023: Hall Blvd walking tour and Tigard Public Library meeting Impacts (Community, Budget, Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) •City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-25 •Vision: an equitable community that is walkable,healthy, and accessible for everyone •Tigard City Council Goals 2023-25 •Action 2.1: Prioritize carbon responsibility in the City of Tigard operations,projects, and policies •Action 4.1: Identify& secure funding to complete the Hall Boulevard jurisdictional transfer •Action 4.3: Increase funding to expand connectivity& support an active, healthy, and accessible community •Tigard 2040 Transportation System Plan (2022) •Policy 1: Provide a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users. •Tigard Complete Streets Policy (2019) •Vision: Tigard is a vibrant and healthy community where people of all ages and abilities can travel safely, efficiently, and comfortably on a well-connected and optimized multi-modal network of roads, trails, and paths. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION Council could choose not to adopt the Concept Design Report. However, doing so could delay progress toward an eventual jurisdictional transfer of Hall Boulevard. Council may also adopt the Concept Design Report with suggested revisions. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Attachments CDR Resolution Hall CDR PPT Hall CDR CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 24- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISION CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT WHEREAS, the city's adopted strategic vision calls for Tigard to be "an equitable community, that is walkable, healthy,and acceptable to all;"and WHEREAS, Policy 1 of the 2040 Transportation System Plan requires the city to "provide a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users,especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users;"and WHEREAS, the city's Complete Streets Policy envisions Tigard as a "vibrant and healthy community where people of all ages and abilities can travel safely, efficiently, and comfortably on a well-connected and optimized multi-modal network of roads,trails,and paths;"and WHEREAS, Southwest Hall Boulevard within the City of Tigard is not maintained to a standard of quality that is acceptable to the community;and WHEREAS, Southwest Hall Boulevard within the City of Tigard is not built to a standard of design that safely and comfortably serves roadway users of all ages and abilities;and WHEREAS,Action 4.1 of the 2023-25 Council Goals is to "[i]dentify; and secure funding to complete the Hall Boulevard jurisdictional transfer;"and WHEREAS, House Bill 2793 created a jurisdictional transfer advisory committee and application process requiring local agencies to submit an adopted "community vision plan" to be eligible for consideration for state funding;and WHEREAS, the Council desires to formalize the community's vision for a future Southwest Hall Boulevard in the city through adoption of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Vision Concept Design Report and to have this document inform future policy direction,planning efforts,and amendments to city codes and standards. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council Adopts the Hall Boulevard Corridor Vision Concept Design Report attached hereto as Exhibit A and made part of this Resolution. SECTION 2: This Resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2024. RESOLUTION NO. 24- Page 1 Mayor- City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 24- Page 2 Hall Boulevard Corridor VisioningProject: Final Concept Report Tigard City Council February 13, 2024 The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Tigard Agenda • The Hall Boulevard Vision • Implementation • Jurisdictional Transfer Process • Next Steps • Recommendation e., CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence r - . . , iii. What is the Hall Blvd -', - ______ _ Vision'. I _ ry a _ Defines a range of needed1 __ . . _,_,, ,. ., , ,_.. - . ,-,.. upgrades and safety ____ 1 :-.4,-.- , _, i _ .improvements required to allow - ' . . • • . residents and visitors of all ages -__— .....,.— — i ,- . .2%...'-:- C' 411� and abilities to move throughout .,"... 4 • ,. .„, , „ and across the corridor to meet 1 - ___ \___ �o their dailytravel needs '� -- _ ��y �' . ��.,: _ •.. ; _ ,_ -- ._ -...1-% 4-0-, '-.,01. ----- , h r' 4 • CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Washington Square - µ - ' , .'k ST • �A Vision Serving Multiple , ---j - -J y NORTH DAKOTA ST , % # Goals - _ 4 -1-•. d /Triangl of .1 Downtown 1 I's' r r t • Mobility for all r , . - - , 1 , - Lu w Le 1 • Promote and ensure safety '- � - - • Connecting neighborhoods and Hall Blvd connects # ._ places many places. ,s,. y • Catalyst for desired development v,...w�.J. - } - � ighborhoodsr .. ' • Liability --> Asset "'ILL MOUNTAIN RD r...4. � � � � �` ill . .• FI n � . AI , f S111111 ei ^Major RoadsIIIII %% y W. .0f oilli—Trails , A 1 i Railroad - — B IRIIA4Atiili • CITY OF Ii The 5 E's -Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence II Mii PlanningContext CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PLAN VISION GOALS+ACTIONS Tigard:an equitable community that 2.1 Prioritize carbon responsibility is walkable,healthy,and accessible in the City of Tigard operations, for everyoneprojects,and policies (Source=City of Tigard Strotegic 41 Identify i-secure funding to • Strategic Plan Vision Pion 2020-2025) complete the Hall Boulevard jurisdictional transfer ► 4.3 Increase funding to expand • Tigard Council Goals & Actions connectivity+support an active, healthy,accessible community • Tigard Complete Streets Policy (Source-City Council Gaols 2023.2025) TIGARD'S COMPLETE STREETS VISION Tigard is a vibrant and healthy community where • people of all ages and abilities can travel safely, efficiently and comfortably on a well-connected and optimized multi-modal network of roads,trails,and paths. (Source=Tigard Complete Streets Policy Implementation Plan 2019) • CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence . 1, 1 : „ . ,,. . Planning Context (cont.) ,. . . 1. 1 . ., . ,-- „ . ... , . , , . ....::,, . , , . .. . • • 2040 Transportation System Plan (TSP) - ` R �`-�� . :--3:. :flaw iito p y � � _ • ODOT and Tigard shared workplan I • "State of Good Repair" data collection _ �' p yri . and estimates _ +< _{ _ ` r r _- Tigard On the Move : '-"_ Transportation .lW .4. , - • 2023 Legislative session: HB2793 to System Plan $ ., _ j, :i. fft Transportation System Plan ez. Adopted January 2022 • CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Creating the Vision 1 . Existing conditions 6. Concept refinement 2. Key stakeholder interviews 7. TTAC & Council input 3. Open House #1 & public 8. Final concept vision and input map report 4. Concept development 5. Open House #2 & public input map MI .0 CITYOFTigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Creating the Vision: Timeline Proposed Concept Stage Existing Concept Feasible high-level concept Draft Concept Final Concept Conditions Alternatives based on City values + public Design Report Design Report input We are HERE: Public Stakeholder Online Open Online Open TTAC, Ci Comment Interviews House 1 House 2 Council City Council Opportunities 2022 Fall Winter 2023 Spring Summer 2024 Winter Hall Blvd Hall Blvd Walking Tour Walking Tour Proposed Improvements • Consistent cross-section • 31 location -specific recommendations • Several overlapping with already planned TSP projects • Provides guidance on implementation strategy and segment prioritization MI .0 CITYOFTigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Proposed Improvements (cont.) • Typical cross section: • Two travel lanes • Continuous sidewalks f ►� • Continuous, separated arated bike facilities ,f_i'i° ` , , r t • Improved bus stops o; o • Improved lighting Proposed typical cross section for Hall Boulevard. • Stormwater facilities iTik:` ..• CITY OF Ti g a rd The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Hall Boulevard LOCUST-ST ,____, Proposed Improvements (cont.) North Segment • Organized into 4 segments between Locust i'FArLtSf 1 St and Durham Rd 1 C Central Segment(A] • North — Central A — Central B - South wj • Consistent Y eal Segment{B} • Maintains 2 travel lanes and a center turn lane MCDONALD ST outside of intersections BDNfTA RD • Multimodal South Segment� sATrLER 5'r — I • Continuous ped and bike facilities, enhanced 1 crossings, improved bus stops, improved DURAMRD S IIT intersection operations -- D 2!,,,,,,15MILE5 CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Proposed Improvements (cont.) fr r -Tr , -- ____. . . --- . • Other recommendations .r�` ' • Consideration of roundabouts at key 'w ,r -:: , . WL: r ENHANCED CROSSING WITH SAFTEV ISLAND AND RECTANGULAR RAPID fLA5iiINA @EACON5 intersectionsAk.: . • Implement planned TSP projects _ - _ .. _ - - - • .,.: CONSISTENT WAYFINDING r'.Y ' i; - 44�� . yam,,'' - SIGNAGE ALONGROOTE • Pedestrian crossingimprovements ' -• r. . ,;1 • Protected intersections '' i . V • Consideration of a two-way shared use �.s '�'; path between the library and '.-.L__ downtown •g - `�-` � E ISEC KE AND ' RAISEQ DIKE LANES . A . .11111111b. 3i - _ 4 • CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence How is the Vision Implemented? • Corridor improvements are typically implemented in three ways: • Incrementally through development (development-funded frontage improvements) • Incrementally through completion of planned TSP and/or Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects • Or, through larger scale corridor projects most often funded through multiple sources (external funding) • Planning level cost estimate for all recommendations • Design, right of way, utilities: $14M • Engineering and construction: $91 M e. CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Successes To- Date .,..-.10, b. 5tHOOL � i, '• Congressionally-delegated spending , SPEED =r- . ' ' • Awarded $3M in ped crossing improvements (2022) ` . 2 =f;; r' • t-:N ...-;z11 .{ • Pending $ 1M request for ped crossing improvements (2023) , . { I . : : . iv- • 2023 Oregon legislative session u, ;{` . +� F ° g g _ ' • HB2793 "JT Process Committee" passed • $3M contribution for pedestrian safety improvements . .• • Oregon Community Paths grant (2023) • Ti and awarded funding to rebuild Fanno Creek Trail crossing " r Other * . ti, , CITY OF Ti a rd The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence . Jurisdictional Transfer Process • House Bill 2793 • Jurisdictional transfer committee • 3 facilities recommended for transfer every other year (starting September 2024) • Application requires completion of "Community Visioning Plan" CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence What Does Adoption of the CDR Accomplish? • Formally documents and memorializes the community-driven vision for a future Hall Boulevard • Provides the city with clear design direction in preparation for future investments • Fulfills a requirement of the HB 2793 jurisdictional transfer process rr CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Next Steps • Continue coordinating with ODOT on shared work plan and MOU terms for transfer • HB 2793 Application • Develop scope of repairs and improvements to be included in application for transfer • Develop operations and maintenance plan • Make necessary amendments to TSP and Tigard Community Development Code to codify CDR recommendations. /Z CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Question before Council • Shall Tigard City Council resolve to adopt the Hall Blvd Corridor Vision Concept Design Report? • CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Recommendation • Staff recommends Council adopt the CDR CITYOFTigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Discussion and Q&A i. . ,,, 4 ,, , _. . , ,,... . i s ' .; t • _ f' 1 �r 5° 1. • ..}''4, _ .. '• trt 'f • �y q.f_t . r r it �. � �,1 t Dave Roth ` :11 -yy ' J Principal Transportation Planner - " . � - daver�tigard-or.gov `;, rpt;;� — - ___ 4• e — — _ ,. • CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Supplemental Packet for February 13, 2024 Council Meeting - Item 10 City of Tigard TIGARD Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor Heidi Lueb and City Council Steve Rymer, City Manager Emily Tritsch,Assistant City Manager Kenny Asher, Community Development Director From: Dave Roth, Principal Transportation Planner Re: Hall Blvd Corridor Visioning Concept Design Report Edits Date: February 13, 2024 This memorandum provides a summary of minor edits made to the Hall Blvd Corridor Visioning Concept Design Report (CDR) subsequent to publishing the February 13, 2024 Tigard City Council meeting agenda packet. 1) Updated month and year from January 2024 to February 2024 on the cover of the report. 2) Added date of anticipated report adoption (February 13, 2024) to the acknowledgements section on page 2. 3) Corrected a typo on page 26: "including." 4) On page 34, added a bullet: "During detailed design and engineering phases, study alternative intersection treatments such as roundabouts at all signalized intersections to prioritize safety and traffic flow for all modes." ` `"P-4 , ,' : upleental Packet A y - :lorebrupry 1 ,, 2024 n:h 'i _,...... ...3;1,,.,. ..0 ncil.Meeting - Item 10 4 . 1 .7 : .� •. ' r ;, 's_ . .# r3 % g y (� sp.. .7.t ,y4' �. � • fi` .-" rye s,, `� 1^ – • • a' '� z� 11`4.,„ is K. ^ S : • 1- 4 �r. 4 1M'w ,; :irl . ; k — M f T. �l --e .' ;` g" 'x.� ', „ i -_� - _ ]5• , ~ .• 1 i. '..o„1-,• y p fi ; ,. t— •L'.'•'+i�y 3 ' ,j -�' ., a. -Or -+, . &w ' 5 t. – 0 _____ r, t t� ___.....r HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT February 2024 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dave Roth, Principal Transportation Planner Joe Wisniewski, City Engineer Alta Planning + Design. Derek Abe and Philip Longenecker, Consultant Team Thanks to Tigard's Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) and members of the Tigard community who provided invaluable input during the engagement process. Adopted by Tigard City Council February 13, 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMAIif 4. PLANNING PROCESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 PLANNING PROCESS 28 Key Takeaways from Public Engagement Efforts 30 1 . PURPOSE 5. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW? 6 Purpose 7 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 32 Jurisdictional Transfer 8 From Plan to Project: Throughline from the TSP 33 Tigard and ODOT's Shared Work Plan and A New Vision for Hall Boulevard 33 Memorandum of Understanding 8 High-Level Concept Shaped by City Values and Tigard's Transportation Public Input 33 System Plan 9 Segment and Perspective Views 36 The Metro Area's Urban Arterial Problem 9 Why Three Lanes?Wouldn't More Lanes Be Better? 45 2. DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY Key Intersections 46 Recommendations Table 48 DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY 10 Tigard's Complete Street Policy 11 6. IMPLEMENTATION Tigard's Transportation Safety Action Plan (2019) 12 Policy Context: Guiding Principles for IMPLEMENTATION 52 Hall Boulevard 13 North Segment(Locust Street to Highway 99) 53 Themes from Tigard's Goals and Policies 14 Central Segment(A) (Highway 99 to Commercial Street) 54 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS Central Segment(B) (Commercial Street to Omara Street) 54 EXISTING CONDITIONS 16 South Segment(Omara Street to Durham Road) 55 Condition Summary 20 Cost Estimate 56 Hall Boulevard's Functional Classification and Existing Design 22 Prioritization 56 7. APPENDIX APPENDIX 58 77 • . . ,N Y ...; 4; }' ' !: J' 'y.r.-, fir +u. ..�Y'�7, ",:•••;.;• t . '., • �W. i ,'.,4 -_� s• ,....-i. '1 r iy r► 4.. !,1P1-.112., •v im .r,.* .§ 6 .r+�• � i '°� r .r.1'w>-: l';''—:::—.\--)a.‘ �7 . :4114-1 rh 7,;c ,try +r ��J '}• C' .. f�{ �-• ��Yf - >-...-.„—____-_-___;.,. =,.• ,� t. LIMIT 447 "., } > - +A..4� ` i'� „•',,,,,' .:,� J '?r' -±°a _ '•.�. o-'.�t•,,. f +�( �• .• ::b ''s,/..•�' ,• 4,a^f. 5sa'3'a,�„t4 ' !' .r, r c>, 4 f y gyp f; ` 3 �. � " _ % Y,7� ' •it',/" t �T, Fy� _. .� I} 4N' - - •i'1 r'••"'- j ie•• J' , ^ 3'!. `. , a 4,T. rj yy C. +'vq 1✓E^ 1 1 i . .1.11.'::: + ." _ j 11 ... 4 _ i " Yiy ' Tam syr.•' _ — - __— _"'��-�_ ► ' . ..•'4 -14 7°lifilli R�.r�: .f. i��„F• ,yS may„• .,....,„4- =--_ �. —r'-� Y •.,irk - '7 - i- � >; �_,�,,. :11- '' ___„0-07-i•--7"-- §:�w. C �. .. ..c.-.1°-.."-414.• • .'g a $ 41 A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project is engaging with Currently owned and maintained by the Oregon the community to create a plan for an Department of Transportation (ODOT), Hall Boulevard improved Hall Boulevard so that people is a key transportation corridor within the City of of all ages and abilities can walk,ride Tigard. The road provides access and mobility to transit,roll and drive wherever they a broad cross-section of the local and regional need to go.This corridor plan will population and is adjacent to several different and support the City of Tigard's efforts varied land uses. It is a key roadway for several in securing funding needed to make nearby schools, including Metzger, James Templeton improvements and ultimately to take and Durham Elementary, Twality Middle, and Tigard over jurisdictional ownership of the High School. road from the Oregon Department of Transportation. Today, however,the road no longer meets the needs or expectations of a community that has grown around it. Aligned with Tigard's Strategic Vision priorities focusing on increasing walkability, In addition to typical proposed cross sections connectivity, and equity,the Corridor Visioning for each study segment,the following pages Project will support the city's goal of improving and detail recommended improvements for specific ultimately taking over jurisdictional ownership of the intersections, including traffic signal changes, road. curb reconfigurations, and pedestrian crossing The Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project enhancements. provides a high-level concept for a future roadway The cost to rebuild Hall Boulevard as proposed in that safely and comfortably accommodates people this plan is estimated to be approximately$61.1M, or of all ages and abilities, regardless of how they roughly double that of the cost to bring the roadway choose to travel. This corridor plan describes the up to a State of Good Repair. This does not include improvements required to make Hall Boulevard a the soft costs of engineering or design work, nor complete street; such improvements suggest that does it include the costs of moving utilities and Tigard will need to take over jurisdictional ownership acquiring right-of-way. These additional costs can of the road from the Oregon Department of vary but our initial estimates place the total cost Transportation (ODOT). including these expenses at over$100M. The proposed vision is the culmination of an existing conditions analysis, multiple focus groups, and two rounds of public engagement. This plan recommends iflor/ a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard to � r i maintain the two general travel lanes with a center �.P - . LINFI turn lane, and expand the total roadway footprint ;, to include consistent, grade separated walking and 411r� ? o biking facilities, pedestrian-scale lighting, enhanced r bus stops, and tree canopy(right). Proposed typical cross section for Hall Boulevard. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 • 1.W....' , ' ),.--",,,4,,,,..,_. 1,..; 6. , " .,' ' ;.•" ...., .4 ' , --• ... ,. .':T. 4-F.-14`1V;0' f 'r•,f"-r."- c3. ' ' ._ 'r . .10„k'.*,• ,.441'. 4.- 4S.4. ''' .341 -• !'ailp kTet Al," ..i. '.- ' 1..... 0.1 A ,....- . ..41_,%,P,,• „all t_.,yr_ ,,,,,." *120...1; 0.' • 4.0y P -4.i.-. • —r 4, .,.. •- :- ...- li,. ..-•-airv4„•1 tr,.._rp:q' ,r ,''; ft; •.3:11,V ..14 0 dvilirii$....d,.: '._d,V •••• • , '.N.--. I 'I,• \ .1.r t•-1.7.3 ''''','- .41 - ‘ ... P--'t'AI' gA - 1Wialt%... .'••47•.' . ,... -- • \' • .:N,, 41 • — 4._ ..._ . :0• , ' , ''''''4 ile:..... ...." tt.n11111,-" ' .t• ....., lt.''',-..- ,:ilifil:4610. --' P!. / - - .6-, i. .:. ....e,N, .., • • .;- '''i" IFJ • , • ..-tri: —...1 ., .-2tis r ,t'4,010/' ._.•••:p- , , -\c-7",„Arjatr,.. . f'4' % , „, ” '. . :',:71^..!..4bt g'4. I :.-.. ,--- --; • ,•,.4.,.,-",_ ,:••=-.-,5 p•cdt_ ' •4k..' . • SPEED '0 , 1,..t • r -• ..._.. t; T'r, - . ,-.. , LIMIT ..• .. II .1.,. . ' •041 A?. : — , _____•--- -- .r. -1t4 :•- .ii,- L.:. e• . ., . • • _., 30 -,.#4,,,,, cl • 4A P .0.... ..-• r"P' •I'';'I ! ..' ' r d'..." :..... .. , . •- • ___------• . i . ,: .-'- • V• 1.10 • i' : 0. !' i• --' .1 f • li A•-• • • . I 4 F [E NPFHOORTCE 0 . . . : ,_ ,--:,.. 1 . r., , A. ,,,.... .• . r 4 4. • ....' A A •i ' '' II re'' 7: ' 1111 1 lg. 4 .. . _ ''. Wig'''. ii ...... 'j,,f:- .—_- 4°---.'•-MAT --11 -?.. -• : . - .--.... . .1 ' • ..- di—- —•-.1•• MP•- • _ i',1111W4 ---•-• .--..., .--- _,.....„, --- -.1°.°°- -.. _ .,.............._ -1 - .;.•••• ../ ....." .... r.„.....-- -- ...r.--' c., . . '. -,.•-•..1 .-..d..,4,34 IC — . ' , ... f• +1,.....' '• - ',.., • . W 1. ..- - •1 . -... k.1 ,.., . ,. _ t, • . • ' .,....t.. . .. ' Ti • • - . . . . . , i . .., • Z • ..•. .- •.• . • • _• . ' • •:..1-.,'.' ..•• ' • - I , , , • .. I....,,.cw. ..: .. ., • ... _ .. _. ,.,.., . . .. ... .,•44;1; . . , . , • 1 . - ... ._ . ., .. • , . d . . • - ' • i . . -.._ • . .•7.•:, , .. A • , -' . . , 7. 4 ' ..• _ 1 . WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW . WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW ? Purpose Hall Boulevard, also known as OR-141, is a major experience disappearing bike lanes, and bike lanes north-south arterial corridor running through Tigard that do exist are not built to a standard that support and providing connections to the communities of all ages and abilities riding. Beaverton, Portland, Durham, Tualatin, and points beyond. The road sees a diversity of users traveling In recent years, potential opportunities (and on foot, aided by mobility devices, on two wheels, constraints) along segments of the corridor have via public transit, and by personal vehicle to meet been studied extensively as part of planning their daily transportation needs. After decades of for the Southwest Corridor and transit oriented disinvestment,the Hall Boulevard of today impedes development,the Washington Square Regional safe and efficient travel options for Tigard residents, Center Plan update, and the current Downtown particularly those most in need of protection from Reimagined project. automobile traffic. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)- owned and operated Hall Boulevard travels along The Hall Boulevard corridor has a range of frontages,through various land use tremendous potential to connect contexts, and provides critical access to opportunity people to places by linking Tigard's land use goals with its multimodal for some of Tigard's most vulnerable neighborhoods. Although the roadway is currently within ODOT's transportation objectives. jurisdiction, Tigard is working with the State to fund the transfer in ownership of Hall Boulevard to the City. With the City of Tigard as owner and operator of the roadway,the City would have greater control over the physical conditions and design of Hall Boulevard that affect so many of its residents. The intent of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project is to document existing conditions, needs, Conditions along the corridor vary considerably and constraints, and develop conceptual design and for non-motorized users,their ability to safely options and planning level cost estimates the City travel along the corridor is limited by missing and will use to secure funding needed to improve Hall substandard infrastructure. Drivers can get where Boulevard and to create a mechanism to transfer they need to go but experience severely degraded the roadway from ODOT to the City. Realizing the pavement and congestion in a few locations during community's vision for a future Hall Boulevard will peak hours. People walking and rolling face a boost safe transportation choices, improve options patchwork of sidewalks,with existing sections often for healthy and active lifestyles, and increase in poor condition and many sections completely economic prosperity by expanding access to goods, missing. People walking and rolling also have services, education, and employment. few improved roadway crossing opportunities throughout the corridor. Similarly, people riding a bike HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW? 7 Jurisdictional Transfer Tigard and ODOT's Shared Work Plan and Memorandum of Understanding The City of Tigard is committed to redesigning and rebuilding Hall Blvd to a standard of safety and Upon completion of its 2019 Condition Assessment quality that meets the needs of everyday users of the study,the City of Tigard initiated discussions with roadway. Significant funding combined with a transfer ODOT regarding needed repairs and a desire in ownership of the roadway are prerequisites to for future City ownership of the roadway. In late future improvements. 2020,the two agencies signed a Memorandum of Understanding that 1) demonstrates commitment The key to unlocking a transfer of Hall Boulevard to pursue a path forward for jurisdictional transfer is funding. With sufficient funding allocated to of Hall Boulevard, and 2) ensures that each party Hall Boulevard, Tigard would work with ODOT to coordinates investments on the roadway. The develop an Intergovernmental Agreement outlining Memorandum of Understanding provides a shared the terms of a transfer that would be brought to the work plan for each agency to deliver on the two Oregon Transportation Commission who is ultimately stated objectives. responsible for approving transfers of state highways to local jurisdictions. Between 2020 and the drafting of this report in 2023, City of Tigard staff and ODOT staff held The terms of the transfer would ensure that the State regular meetings and work sessions making invests enough money to bring the roadway into significant progress toward stated Memorandum of what is called a "State of Good Repair." This prevents Understanding objectives. Progress to date includes the City of Tigard from being saddled with the costs raising visibility of Hall Boulevard to the community required to update the roadway to a basic standard and decision makers, applying for and securing of quality when taking it over. However,the City of several million dollars in funding for incremental Tigard wants to upgrade Hall Boulevard beyond safety improvements, reducing the posted speed simply repaving the status quo. The corridor visioning limit on a key section of Hall Boulevard from 40mph project identifies what additional improvements to 30mph, completing the additional necessary asset are needed to make Hall Boulevard a corridor that condition study, and Tigard's leading of an effort functions for users of all ages and abilities, promotes to secure state funding through a 2023 legislative safety, connects neighborhoods, and serves as a funding request. catalyst for new development opportunities along the corridor. KE;. For more information on this subject, refer to Metro's Regional Framework for Highway Jurisdictional = - Transfer Study(202 . P TEP Hall Boulevard looking south toward City Hall. Ownership of Hall Boulevard will transfer from ODOT to the City of Tigard. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW? Tigard's Transportation .. System Plan The 2040 Transportation System Plan (TSP)was Tigard pn theMove initiated in 2020 and responds to a new strategic Transportation vision for Tigard's future, which emphasizes System Plan developing a multimodal transportation system that T�AP �►"-a_ _. :��. .�"&,p.-•:� •iii I is walkable, healthy, sustainable, and accessible ,: • for everyone. This TSP serves as an important '' �."�' f long-range planning tool for Tigard to ensure its transportation system can meet community needs, - _ realize the City's strategic vision, and conform to state and regional policies. - . The TSP discusses Hall Boulevard in the • '+� . following ways: FEHR s PEERS • January t02t ► Hall Boulevard will be a key north-south route between neighborhoods within Tigard, providing a critical function for accessing downtown,the Tigard Transit Center,the The Metro Area's Urban Arterial Problem Tigard Triangle, and numerous civic uses, As an ODOT-owned and operated urban arterial,the including the library. With a potential for problems with Hall Boulevard are not unique within jurisdictional transfer of this road,the City the greater Portland metropolitan area. Originally has an interest in enhancing this corridor with constructed to function as rural "farm to market" improved sidewalks and bikeways between routes, roads like Hall Boulevard have seen very SW Omara Street and Pacific Highway(pg 34). limited investment while the cities surrounding them have steadily grown and urbanized. In its December ► There is a need to update the characterization 2020 Regional Framework for Highway Jurisdictional of Hall Boulevard to reflect the jurisdictional Transfer Study, Oregon Metro identified eleven transfer from ODOT to the City of Tigard (pg `promising' state-owned transfer candidate corridors 60). across the region. ► Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard are the Portions of Hall Boulevard are included as one of primary access routes to the downtown area the 11 "promising" state-owned transfer candidate (pg 32). corridors across the region. Unsurprisingly, portions of Hall Boulevard are included among the promising ► The need to reexamine the alignment of transfer candidates scoring high in both a "technical" Scoffins Street/Hunziker Street at Hall and a "readiness for transfer" rubric. In addition to Boulevard (pg 23). identifying candidate roadways for transfer, ODOT ► Pedestrian and bicycle crossing opportunities and Metro's study outlines best practices and the at the intersection of Commercial Street and legal process required to successfully transfer a Hall Boulevard should be improved (pg 33). roadway from the State to a local jurisdiction. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW? 9 r ... lIllillIlli.Pilr/ / /, - '' • . -i•-• - ,:or ', : / .fir � � . ' 1 tr, , „, ?...,....e. :, . . A __ , 0 . I i _ I mo ;tea`.. I 4' I:- • k . 1 it 14* liL" i r it _ .`. _7, 2. Tigard's Complete Street Policy Adopted in 2019, The Complete Streets Policy for the City of Tigard guides its work to create a safe, efficient, and comfortable transportation system for all users, regardless of age or ability. 11111 IIV"— 6 GUIDING PRINCIPLES: • Serve All Users: The City will Support Land Use Planning develop and manage rights-of-way IP Goals:The City will design and to promote access and mobility for develop a transportation network all users,with a particular focus on that supports the land use enhancing the safety of vulnerable goals and policies of the Tigard road users. Comprehensive Plan. 2 Provide Interconnected Networks: 5 Internal and Jurisdictional The City will strive to provide Coordination:The City will a connected network of safe, foster partnerships with local accessible, and convenient travel businesses, developers, community routes for non-motorized travel, organizations, and regional including off-street trails and agencies to develop seamless pathways for bicycling and walkingtransportation facilities and accommodations. 3 Use Best Practices and Innovative, Context-Sensitive Design: The City6 Measure Performance:The City will use current and emerging best will track and report on policy practices in transportation network implementation performance using and facility design to serve the indicators that reflect transportation multimodal transportation needs safety, efficiency, mobility, of all users. It will also use context- accessibility, and experience for sensitive design to address unique all users. local conditions and constraints. The policy applies to all transportation facilities within the public rights-of-way, on public property, and/or within a public access easement. It also applies to the routine planning, design, implementation, operation, and maintenance of all transportation infrastructure. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY • Tigard's Transportation Safety Action Plan (2019) The following intersections were ranked among the The City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action highest priority intersections in Tigard given their Plan (TSAP) documents the findings from a citywide history of crashes and severity: transportation safety analysis that examined crashes involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. The TSAP describes crash trends and patterns, prioritizes locations for safety improvements, and presents Si Highway 99 and Hall potential safety treatments for locations with the mostBoulevard potential to reduce fatal and severe injury crashes in the city, some of which involve Hall Boulevard. The TSAP identifies potential safety improvements and creates an avenue for the City to pursue ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety(ARTS) and other grant # 14 ) Hall Boulevard and funding to enhance transportation safety. Durham Road :;:; Al ]C-mss_. a._ - - ------ - lily:-.--' __ —_______ -in ., ;414_ 2 :1 -01- ill . ___ . _ ____ ?.= . � - - fry - • . ,. ■. � M. �5�. Q7 )� ' . ;""'= - - - _-- , ^= T^ -- c People waiting for the signal to change while walking across Highway 99 at Hall Boulevard. The City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan places this intersection as the highest priority in the city. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT ' DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY Policy Context: Guiding Principles for Hall Boulevard Lf4rig I I ■A■ CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PLAN VISION GOALS + ACTIONS Tigard: an equitable community that 2.1 Prioritize carbon responsibility is walkable, healthy, and accessible in the City of Tigard operations, for everyoneprojects, and policies ► 4.1 Identify+secure funding to (Source:City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025) complete the Hall Boulevard jurisdictional transfer ► 4.3 Increase funding to expand connectivity+support an active, healthy, accessible community (Source:City Council Goals 2023-2025) TIGARD'S COMPLETE STREETS VISION Tigard is a vibrant and healthy community where • people of all ages and abilities can travel safely, efficiently and comfortably on a well-connected and optimized multi- modal network of roads,trails, and paths. (Source: Tigard Complete Streets Policy Implementation Plan 2019) HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY 13 Themes from Tigard's Goals and Policies A range of plans already adopted by the City of Several key policy themes emerged from Tigard's Tigard and its partners set an important foundation goals and policies, which served as guiding for the Hall Boulevard Corridor project. This section principles for the corridor visioning project: provides a policy synthesis of five documents that impact transportation system planning and design in 1. Walkable Tigard: a. Safe and comfortable for all ages and abilities ► Tigard Complete Streets Policy Implementation b. Multimodal: encouraging pedestrian and Plan (2019) bicycle travel ► City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan 2. Connected (2019) a. Connecting residents to parks, schools,transit, businesses, and other ► Council Goals (2023-2025) neighborhoods ► City of Tigard Transportation System Plan 3. Equitable (2022) a. Supporting environmental and community health ► City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020 —2025 b. Addressing access disparities for low- income communities and communities ► City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan (2007) of color (See the Appendix for more information) GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE HALL CORRIDOR VISION: • WALKABILITY 0-0 CONNECTEDNESS 0D EQUITY Safety and comfort for people Improving connections for all A key goal for the Hall Boulevard walking or bicycling is an essential transportation system users is Corridor Visioning Project is to component of the Hall Boulevard another critical goal for the corridor ensure that the planning process is Corridor Visioning Project.While visioning project. City policies inclusive and that the transportation creating a multimodal system is a call for providing access to jobs, outcomes serve everyone,especially goal in all City transportation policies, schools,and essential services with those from historically marginalized "walkability"is especially emphasized convenient and affordable travel and underserved communities. in Tigard planning goals.A walkable options.The Strategic Plan aims to City plans often reference this goal transportation system is one that is make parks available to all residents in the context of accessibility and safe and comfortable for people of all within a 10-minute walk. Increased affordable travel options,as well ages and abilities. connectivity supports economic as supporting environmental and vibrancy,which will be essential community health. for the development of the Tigard Triangle,downtown,and Washington Square Regional Center. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT ' DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY A NOTE ON THE REGION'S APPROACH TO SAFETY In the greater Portland region,traffic fatalities and severe injuries are on the rise, and the region is not on track to meet its targets. People walking are more likely to die in crashes than people using other modes of transportation. A majority of traffic deaths occur in a ► The average annual number of fatalities relatively small number of locations, mostly increased from 62 in 2015 to 83 in 2019, along arterial roads. Making these streets an increase of 34 percent. Between 2018 and intersections safer is critical to reducing and 2019,the average number of fatalities crashes in the region. While the vast increased 10 percent from 75 to 83. majority of crashes in the region involve only motorists, bicyclists, motorcyclists, Pedestrian fatalities are increasing more and especially pedestrians are vulnerable than other fatal crashes. Forty percent of travelers who face significantly higher risk of people killed in 2019 were pedestrians, up death when they are involved in crashes. from 35 percent in 2015. In 2018,the Metro Council and Joint Policy ► The average annual number of non- Advisory Committee on Transportation motorized (pedestrians and bicyclists) adopted a target to reach zero traffic deaths fatalities and serious injuries increased from and serious injuries by 2035. The effort 113 in 2015 to 127 in 2019, an increase of to make this goal a reality is called Vision 12 percent. Zero, and it includes implementing proven safety countermeasures such as speed ► Fatality rates per vehicle miles traveled also management, medians, crosswalk visibility increased from 0.6 fatalities per 100 million enhancements, bicycle lanes, sidewalks, vehicle miles traveled in 2015 to 0.8 in and more. 2019, a 33 percent increase. According to Metro's latest safety report,' Not only do the proposed improvements which documented trends on traffic fatalities in the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning and serious injuries between 2015-2019,the Project follow the established design region is not on track for achieving its Vision principles and policies adopted by the Zero goals. City of Tigard, but they align with Metro's approach to traffic safety in the region and aim to reduce traffic deaths of all types. 1 Portland metropolitan area 2019 traffic fatalities and serious injuries annual performance report.Metro. February 2021.https://www.oregonmetro.gov/sites/ default/files/2021/03/04/Metro-safe ty-ann ual- performance-report-2015-2019.pdf HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY • �V-Jv. ti- ;••...:•••••-• t �?Ll +, . : • .-- -� S y� J* � --y .'/".' . - '.'413:,„.-#. +. -- ~ fir p • .a ^S,w• u•- r •" - SCHOOL BUS - - '4 �• ••r. - ` mo i ..•. '= • • • -, - .,. .e. dm,. • ..... ..._....._____. . Fit f� .......„_ L-E*;;;;._ iiiiiiir- -________. _._,.i.r 4k.:7'" '7;iiitt .. ,..:I'm•r.%.. • - ." 'r —UNLAWFUL TO Piss J��o LIsnis FLASH r -IN 111 4- .�-i.1 - j ammay _ , - L11 -r a r l- Blue Bhdboo ,,.4111.1111114' •-. r... t.';'... f M • . T \Ns6, i r .ik‘‘' �: • \ :, . ,t, !IL :, ru.!I��si !' - . s_ 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS Hall Boulevard is an important multimodal MAP 1: Project Extent and Key Areas north-south route in the city that plays a critical role in connecting downtown with residential �1 r_; neighborhoods and future developments in the w rj Hall Boulevard �+�_, Tigard Triangle. It is heavily utilized by many different sL types of travelers,for different trip purposes, along a Washington Square range of frontage and land use contexts' &. (TAK ST ;• ` • I / • / • • • • AFFLE ST ` Ti•. d Triangl • Downtown... H • �,,41P ai • )- Lii 1#t1L J ---_MGDDNNIALD ST - ) — w > _Neighborhoods _ - - , D - 160:J I S..- 1 I • bt RI1Af I ftl} , ' ,,' _5Z.' rI4 .25 6.5 MILES N 1 See the Appendix for more information HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 17 The roadway is classified as an arterial street in the MAP 2: Project Extent and Key Destinations City's TSP. The roadway also intersects with key pieces of Tigard's multiuse path and trail network, such as the Fanno Creek Trail and Cook Park. In . / - addition to serving many walking and biking trips, \ School' Hall Boulevard ' Hall Boulevard is an important transit corridor. t' LOCUST --- 1 Multiple schools are near the roadway, including \ -,s4v OA•K ST Metzger Elementary,West Side Christian High School, Twality Middle School, James Templeton `z --- J Elementary School, Tigard High School and Durham Elementary School, which makes Hall Boulevard ST School i 7.♦PFAFF 'ST important in serving school-related trips. i , H 1 9• Transit,Connections (---.., 1140$ ' — ti t Industry I I o . 4 7 il -' o, AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC �� H - Fanno Creek Trr ail ► Hall Boulevard (north of McDonald St): 13,500 MGDDNALDST ► Hall Boulevard (between McDonald St and W School Bonita Rd): 17,000 a - . o • oi _1 i , By comparison: •• _• SATTLER ST ► Bonita Rd: 17,500 I ' ► McDonald St: 12,500 School ► Greenburg Rd: 17,500 • 1RwAtW - • i : • ' JiI %� For more traffic count information, see the full existing .Cook Park ; , J@L r '.25 ,-6.5MILES conditions analysis in the appendix. z i • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS The visioning project extent,which extends from MAP , Study Segments Along Project Extent Locust St to Durham Road, contains multiple intersections that play a prominent role in the r-J transportation system, including Locust St, Highway O tij Hall Boulevard 99, Hunziker Street/Scoffins Street, McDonald j LOlid 1 ST ST - Street, Bonita Road, and Durham Road. While each z - ? segment of Hall Boulevard has its own opportunitiesi.iOAK ST f and constraints,the overall roadway can be irk,y2 t / North Segment_; 2 conceptualized into three segments with somewhat ykky similar land use and transportation contexts: North (Locust St to Highway 99), Central (Hwy 99 to \ *AFF LEST Commercial St plus Commercial St to Omara St), and South (Omara St to Durham Road). J HWY 99 1--- / Central Segment(A) •w: . a N, N *Ilk 1 Central Segment(B) , � < J t11 MCDONALD ST - ELI > ._ _ - BONITA RD 1- 0 o _ South Segment Li, nu BATTLER ST _ Q x I ' Ill ' II —' v N. gm IMM DURHAM RD 425 , .O.5MILESo NINI • II JD : HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 19 Condition Summary According to Tigard's 2019 Condition Assessment study,the percentage of assets that need to be The condition assessment found that deferred brought to a State of Good Repair,that can be maintenance and rapidly evolving construction costs quantified, are as follows: have left much of the corridor needing significant work to bring Hall Boulevard to a State of Good Repair. The percentage of assets that need to be brought to a State of Good Repair,that can be 81°"° %quantified, are as follows: 81 percent of roadway pavement, 98 percent of curb ramps, 65 percent of ROADWAY CURB storm drainage facilities, and the Ash Creek Bridge. PAVEMENT (97 AMPS The cost to address these corridor-wide deficiencies A° and bring Hall Boulevard to a State of Good Repair was estimated to be approximately$28.4 million (if constructed in 2020). The assessment contains detailed information for Hall Boulevard on everything ASH CREEK from traffic volumes to stormwater facilities. This 6 5 O/0 BRIDGE report serves as an important foundation for the Hall Boulevard visioning project. STORM DRAINAGE REPLACEMENT FACILITIES NEEDED z 113/1 ODOT recently reached a similar conclusion through its own condition assessment work on Hall Boulevard as documented in a State of Good Repair report. The City of Tigard and ODOT have agreed upon a total State of Good Repair investment need of$30 million for the 3-mile section of Hall Boulevard between SW Locust and SW Durham Streets. Following page, top left:Hall Boulevard at Bonita Road. This intersection is missing key infrastructure like ADA accessible curb ramps, sidewalks, and high-visibility crosswalks. This intersection experiences some of the highest peak hour traffic volumes on the corridor. Middle:Looking south on Hall Boulevard south of McDonald Street. Bottom:vegetation obscures speed limit sign. Right:Hall Boulevard north of Oak St. Lack of sidewalks and safe crossings are common in the northern extent of the project area. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS ..-•.--• - .,: di. ..l. '''! so •••.„, . 4 . ...-. 64 Ara,. . ; .•• ., Li ' .'k i r 0•"...,...,Ili."OH r.t•:t.A....... ... .•,:....,2......,....7i. .. . ,. •••‘ •'Mr i I kle e.4'.Alk.1..*,,...11 11•tollk • .:-% . , :•.2 'Ita:i ''''''' • .li -. ik •.'1.^1*.'....-41 .4......p .... •.•,• ... :....L.,•,,.- -. . :i. .. ..,-;=-. %. .. . .. , - Avitix,.,_./teLawirs-• - - 4. •!- .4 7.-.• • ' •to ...4,...!..._....,.• • -I - ••• - I: . .. .,..45.-.,.,,•_._--,....-,., I. ... •.. r - : .4.1 -,•-Kr4. ..-,c:,.:r: - 1 •....mar i• . --V: - .• • •.•••, ---, ... 'At'•t' . ,. .. ..7'4,! L.•-•,...i.,-.----_••.1---• ...?..• _. i.. . -.-f •. ••••..- •• ,-- .-- •••?: •4 •011 • '!!. •_...-,-•"_.___ .3.J:Li. .. .. -• 4 ,, .,.....,— • 1`•'.., ....,. ... ._ .. __ • ,•., • . • , ,•,- -• • . - • • . - , - • A , .......•L, . .,....:_ . .„ ,,,,03-...0.• ....,... __.,. .. - .-.....:f..11' ..r.. : . : - ......___. ..•-• -• - 4.-...:4; ,..„..•-• •: •.:.•••• ..., _ SCHOOL - . _•.-.-,... ••••• • •.•_...,.::-__• . .. . • '*'-''''' . .• . --• •• ,,, ... SPEED ..._. . -. .,, • . „..., ....... ,• ..„.• _..t. . , . .... .,...4, ..... .,,,.. _ . .,,,.... . ., ‘...-, ..-• .. . .., _.... ,- _ 1 . , -- • 1,.-.: • - .. . . ... . ..... . ... 4EPW•---'---• . ••••• - .-77 '''':• ..1: ..'.• • . ..i--• • 'T •• '.17,••, ,-,.• . • ,,,,./ • . .. . .. kl • ..f.l••- •a •:a • ;'1=::'''.'• ' NIk.ii,s. • 20 • .,..... .:... • . , .. _.... .• • ,. . . ... ,.. .. _. .,, . . N. .. .4..,. . ... ..v. ,..„ ._ ... . . ....., WHEN•.:..-•• . -',. .,c.• -.. -/-:4 - -- • • • . . _ - CHILDREN ,.•4, .7.•;-,., .• ••-•,..• •.:-.,......,••„ .- -.....-7-.•.-7:_••:,:• -•-•.:-i•v• •• „•1!.:•.','•.',;:g.:•.-5'.--..':':•-•••'':' • id''''4' • C 1._•,..".. L. ARE PESENT ..., . . .•••••, •;:.•144r '.e.''''', • ;:;-•i'Z•• '----•:::%t•••'-• ••- • •••: •,.. 'k,•.,...... .!,•-••••;,•• •,...1'... .,•::•7'19:.•-•;.•._:,...„..... • ' ••• • • •e ,-••••4; - •,..34,-r,•:.y--. ,....,4 ,. . ., •..,... ,t• .. :-,, A 4‘.• -1.-'. ,1.1: • .ier. ..r ii•-• -, ,:..i,. . . ... . .• •. .. 4..,........ . . .:::6„. .• ........ - ‘• •••‘' •• :' .•. - •1 ,.. :ii • II . ..... . . . • i.-j' • ...'"....-' • .'•;:7: '-f. ..7••:. •-•-,.., hi• e • ••• ..-. ' ., •-••• .. ' t.$.:-JI, .. .• :i_.,_ 0 I7Wrr L,..,,ri :.• •-•-.. ...L.'.. , , ...— _. ,. ,.-. 1 . •_. ' .•• ' •WiWillt%13'- - - • •••••"• -,....• , ••• • ••.3 • • . .-•• • •2!• " . !' iTt+k.k.i.) • ••••' • •• li.•• ... • ' • .• .._ - M• -.• •• .••41.11111 • .., ••••• . .• „ . . •• ••• ••• • 1•.••r V. • . , -- • ,••..I • . .... :.......• .., _ _ •.. . • ,.. . . .- . ••.• .... ••• •••`'•. ••• •/,•.•"W• .•. ••.. . • " •- , - ..:r-.7• / .., ••••••,= : •'•.''•:•'•'••4•:••f...:i,.., .. -..7-',.;-.4:;•.••:'''s.--',.:V•!-T;:•;•-•',1-;-P-- .,•:---.- ...:;-...„•-•4kar:,, ...._ .,--• ..... . , - ---.- .•.:. ''''';„4.,e-tf•:.... .- ••-•:•;....L-- -...,-.Agi-i...-_,J.f..,--.4..,.. ._ ,....,7 -•.LA"'•'7.',••‘-"'-4'•• .-. -4E '''-•' •"-' ' --.,.... ., - ....•:::`.,: .',•-:.: ',77. T.-•44W:.-. • -. -• . .• •••.- : ,,,,J.. 2z,,,,,-;- --19,..r.14::,,,,,,, .--,••. -_„.....• •... .... ..•*.-.-. * ."- ••'••••••-i.- -...Z•4'.••,r,•-•-•.•ki•-•'':.- • . . -....-.,..3,4 lib, :-.4.4,•,...,..--;,,•,..-f,' ..r..,...7. .,- ,.... -45:„..i..... • ,..•.. .-.A. • .. '-.•;•--•-- , - .• -•• -----*k-'-lipt-•• '•• -- • .• i:-.,....--..-,-.--.4%.0-:•.‘.":-..!•!W•rg,- - . ••••• ' • • •" ' si.'". 6,,--111 '''----•''''-. 4*-•'''t.,' ;=-` -''''•• ..• •Lv"1.,...,,'••, . •-•--' ...„iv.;4_f.:':...1'.-• •:',--,s1A.A.44,1...4.; ...,,'.'*.c.,14"" . L9t.,...-. ... .. _ ..4,.._:„..,...'4;.. ....;-..-4.: - . .. .. •''....\';=-.:-' ---n..4.',-t-P41(7.• ''7'..4,:...:-•-•,-:.• ,. --,,x....!•P 5,7.... -;:i:.774'.-Nks••''•'''.1.'.47--,-•.: .Z.::•-;-.•=itir. ,. -- -. •-..-...''--. '-7••- - •.... -.....;,-. :ii:: :•....1.--•:c.."...• •;....-. -.,- .•. :, ,,...•d.: . - ,..-,, --, • .,.. - - -. - •.:,:.-.••••-•-•,-:-..,-..-ffr •-•:"•.•-:::. • ... •-••• .,- , -. . . - •,.... ••••••_• .•-e• --- - -.•. . :-., • .... . • ..•..- . .. ,.. ,.. •,- IF. ...,...•-;_.-.4"./15,-e. .--..--.:.•..4 -", ..i , 1 ...0k n i .•• 7-:-........`' • fo r t" "411: ••••'-'..i... • ... . !' -' .....-.:.-:6?..olit 14.':.•(-!--7-L:7 / ‘-"-•'• . %-Y-F-•.:','-- .' .-'..•-,..,..r':7 , ...:4 .,.• -.& :LI-•:--.cll.- .41-. r„ - 1. -V !. ••!. • "- gl':`''' - •' .-4'....... .......L.. c..-.. . • ch Oti, •_..:.. . . F.,:,_:...,-. -:-..--.7.: •• • / 0, 4• • • • r •,•-•.:.. .'-- -7-4•7-.';-,-;r---.,'-r- .---- • .• -'.. '. - .. -e- . '' '...e-r• :.`•''- : - -'-'-'--r.. . .-...••••, ... . •. • ... . .• • ., .. ..,...,.., --, •-• •-• -a... • 'l iiii j LN 4 . ..., ... . . .._.,. .. ,.. ,-7______ ...j. _. •-• 1.-• 17.4,.• ,. • . a (6411.40 i 4 . ••-•:- ..!„.-'•./SPE r ' ". '454-111.- ; " . ' ••••.,_,. --1:t. -'''..s!..-•••••: ,tie i--' *-..'t.r l'4-if ....- -- ..•.., • -....,. .,,...L. .. ,:i•.' 7.- • -'le- .:'-::' 17 -Nti".7,..1.-`•:.--- . . ..._.-....-- .., ;,./. . ,..-:. . -':-..!••th,„ ••••••.,i•-;-0;;,....A.v...g.. -... . .•• ..-ria-r --. .-: .- ---- ..•••••'-4-..-.701-W-'-...;..--:• • -.• • •..-.----__ •---.- tatioi al •..,.'.... .-•-•...-Te' 7-!..--,!!--. -' .- *. ' N-....- . r;.-.,.,%•-?--:. ".-:.4.......• .okZei. - .'j-,..3...--.,..'"'.-• :ed- ...,4.r.- - ..,- •...---..-..-•• ...- -' "••-:.- *•,...41,- ... . ., .. .4 .- ::5-....tr . • _ ,• --- ,.-- . .,-•„..- e -,t... . ..*1/47 . ' .. ''. PAi•ot;,. _ . . . -..,P- - .6- 11,1/1 . _ 014 .-.. .-- 11 .. -O -- - - • • -.... • • s - -'kjt,..01' • . - — • .;' - , :or . • N• • - ..: ,s,i• ...,..-0,••.,• : .,..-.•-_-,,,,s. •,,, ..., . , - , tic., Tit., , . _ __... -0,.. _7 .• '44*:•! -•'-f•.-.& •• • ':•*•-?".:',:•;..2'.....:;:71•..-',le; •4741'(.7,.:•• • ' . '..ek'!".-.ri • , - "- •• .t.I .• •• - t Or•,•:- 1./Q -.•:-'• -'•::••• 19.. ,-2=4;-• t ;71 i ' 1 - ''''.- •.• •-•.-'••••-•- 'e'' • ..Pf' . - ' •• •/•••• 4.J• .4' r- ",:•,•.:•.•. •22•••• :',,,,-•-,"7-,•-../P•14-• -"• ,..:‘;s','\''.*-I-'.r. •' -it.. ..,,.-._': •• -.7:-,:.-- •-_..'!.,..!.:•:!--_-....: •-••••-,''...0 . -' ' '111•••-• wt.:..--'4 ..t.. •• - — •g• •- •.1%...A ..,:i•;;;_....,:;7F-pz-•-."•:::.f.ir.:..:..•-•.c...,,i--4Z.:•-••.• • •--RI' 2.',." i-'- - -•:-.-..----4....!1' isbi• . — -..::- ! • ...7 ..."'-. - 4 - , f fr ::_l'',.-• • „Ambit,. Ir•••••-•"•: •. ........1111':..:" .r .,,,,....;;?. .:.... - ,plyive • -.-• -';••••:..'z'.-..,.....-•.' .` '' 74r.4.5•'%;•-x''';ii---4,1r--' •"' '• HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT ' EXISTING CONDITIONS 21 Hall Boulevard's Functional Classification and Existing Design Hall Boulevard is classified as an arterial by the TSP. Arterials are designed for higher volumes, but tend not to be major regional travel ways. The TSP describes a multimodal transportation system as one that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone. Instead of solely designing . 4 • for cars,the focus has shifted to strengthening 1 connections, access, and opportunities for all residents with a strong emphasis on equity, safety, A typical existing cross section of Hall Boulevard in the northern segment, from Locust Street to Highway 99. and multimodal accommodation, particularly for walking and bicycling modes. These updates, recommended by the TSP, are reflected in the proposed improvements in the next section. Hall Boulevard is currently built with outdated design standards,with infrastructure that varies from . 6-- 1 _ 111 segment to segment(see right). At the time of writing, ' MIIMERMIII.M. the City of Tigard is updating its engineering design 1 A typical existing cross section of Hall Boulevard in the standards for consistency with the city's development central segment, from Highway 99 to Commercial Street. code and TSP. Existing Roadway Facilities ► Designed for 45 mile per hour speeds ► 11'-13' wide travel lanes 111 .n ► 14' parking lanes , —1111MMENE111.11. ' A typical existing cross section of Hall Boulevard in the Existing Bikeway Facilities central segment, from Commercial Street to Omara Street. ► 4-6' wide, intermittent bike lanes - Existing Pedestrian Facilities ► 5-10' wide, intermittent sidewalks A typical existing cross section of Hall Boulevard in the south segment, from Omara Street to Durham Road. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS CONSTRAINTS Improvements are needed for The following constraints were identified in the Hall Boulevard to meet arterial existing conditions analysis. The memorandum in standards. Hall Boulevard has the the Appendix provides maps and more detailed potential to be a premier active information related to this analysis. transportation corridor within the city's existing and planned ► Hall Boulevard lacks complete infrastructure for networks. - Hall Boulevard all users. Gaps remain in the sidewalk network, Corridor Visioning Project Existing both in terms of missing segments and the Conditions Memorandum provision of ADA accessible curb ramps. Most existing sidewalks are 6ft wide and do not have a landscaping strip separating the walkway from traffic, which reduces the level of comfort for people walking. More recently installed sidewalks, such as those between ,; . -;;lielrer'.. + � Langtree Street and Ashford Street, are 8 ft trh:,' wide and are more comfortable. Sidewalks on seilth ' ;''•=a�` t '•'_ ? .. ...,:k• the east side of Hall Boulevard between Ross :' :riV: - :,r'' ,.••1;;4..; Street and Murdock Street have landscaping � ' ';' j W strip separation but abruptly end before ,`S ',hK '# " .•.; reaching the bus stop to the north. 1. ► Improving sidewalk connections (and „.. �_4 : '''' . .1.t.-.---• � expanding the roadway footprint generally) �I - . -� ' `_ I may be more costly in areas with significant •+ 1 mi _ r, grade differences, such as the ditch north of - �_ Sattler Street on the west side, and the low- _ • :�f., . - _ -:.-..•: . ^:1,iii.,;:..- • ..; _ lying areas around the Hall Boulevard/Bonita ; r •_ Road intersection.:` _ ;y 4. ' - $'fiea- ?.• k , r r•�.; F A ate _ -_, =,� ► Despite serving the frequent service Route 76, . some bus stops along Hall Boulevard remain inaccessible to all users. These stops include f .� _ ; 1':tl-�; -- , w the intersections of Murdock Street and v - '�; . t, '' : _ i .fir <" McDonald Street(northbound). - - , . ► With the exception of the Fanno Creek Trail The roadway footprint expands dramatically south of Crossing and the rectangular rapid flashing Bonita Road. However, the sidewalks connections end beacon (RRFB)just north of Highway 99,the before reaching the intersection(looking south). HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 23 only marked crosswalks exist at signalized ► In addition to the more detailed constraints intersections. The distances between these above,the visioning project will need to crosswalks range from roughly 900 ft(Wall account for the following factors that add Street to the Fanno Creek Trail crossing)to complexity to Hall Boulevard: well over a half mile (north of Highway 99). The lack of crossings for people walking and biking • The combined role that McDonald Street, limits the east-west connectivity of these Hall Boulevard, and Bonita Road have in networks at Hall Boulevard. east/westbound traffic. ► A few intersections that already have marked • The sensitive environmental context around crosswalks with signals have documented Fanno Creek. concerns regarding safety. These include the Fanno Creek Trail, Highway 99, and Durham • The railway crossing between Burnham Road. Street and Commercial Street. ► Hall Boulevard has complete bike lanes • The offset skew of the Hunziker Street along the project extent, but these lanes are Scoffins Street Hall Boulevard intersection. insufficient except for the strongest and most • The inter-jurisdictional nature of Highway fearless of riders. The bike lanes range from 99/Hall Boulevard and the Highway 217 4-6 ft, buses mix with bike lanes at all stops, Crossing. In these locations,the Hall and there are three notable floating bike lanes Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project will that cross right turn pockets:the northbound likely need to focus less on design specifics approach of Hall Boulevard/Bonita Road, and more on recommendations for ODOT. the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/ Knoll Drive,the southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Burnham Street, and the • northbound/southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Hwy 99. Each of these conditions .,..`Tw: �� ; . contribute to a less comfortable environment - � :. � for people biking. •»��:;- , �� . .tz • -:�•.-. ► Available right-of-way appears to be most = = �. ;- =. ¢: :. w-.r ;:,.. .,:.�.F. constrained in the Central segment, between Highway 99 and the Fanno Creek Trail. ° -': Proposed bikeway facility types may need to its \,. F be different in this segment than the North and South segments. Tradeoffs will be difficult here :�` 111111 /1Xi� V` without expanding the available right-of-way �11 �. .: because the downtown area is a critical area 11A.MS%‘ for transportation connections and should have some of the most robust facilities for all users. A storm water grate at the base of a curb ramp, located at the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Spruce Street. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS OPPORTUNITIES the ongoing Downtown Reimagined project presents an opportunity to improve the The following opportunities were identified in the community's perception of downtown in terms existing conditions analysis. The memorandum in of accessibility. the Appendix provides maps and more detailed information related to this analysis. ► Completing sidewalks on both sides of Hall Boulevard is a significant opportunity for the ► That Hall Boulevard connects parts of the city city's pedestrian network, which designates with distinct land use contexts is a strength of Hall Boulevard as a major pedestrian corridor. the corridor. Increasing multimodal connectivity ► Inter neighborhood biking and walking between residential areas and commercial trips: Along Hall Boulevard,there are many districts would greatly improve the corridor's neighborhood cut through paths, which ability to serve different trip types and users as increase the east-west connectivity for people well as fulfill City goals. Hall Boulevard has the walking and biking. These paths could serve potential to connect people to parks, schools, as natural locations for mid block crossings the Tigard Public Library, City Hall,the WES between signalized intersections. Transit stops commuter rail,the future Southwest Corridor could be relocated to align with these paths. light rail, Washington Square, and the Tigard Triangle. ► Other potential crosswalk improvements that emerged from the existing conditions analysis ► The Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project include the north leg of McDonald Street/Hall is highly relevant to the interests of downtown Boulevard and the north leg of Omara Street/ Tigard. Collaborating and coordinating with Hall Boulevard. ' -. '3 n','fist;pis' , f . SFr . . k B wry • •�.'r lr- - �="r'f b•... - 4, r;.. , w. F , 'z.� � ter- 'e j_ �. .. 41,-•_, ,,,, • -, . , •Takr,74,04. ..e.,, 4:s- . , - # - a'(1 The Woodruff Bridge offers a unique connection from Hall Boulevard to the southern portions of the Fanno Creek Trail. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 25 ► Traffic operational improvements including ► Several right turn pockets could be realignment of the Hunziker/Scoffins reevaluated as part of the Hall Boulevard intersection and operational improvements at Corridor Visioning Project. These include major intersections such as Durham Rd, Bonita the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/ Rd, and McDonald St. Bonita Road,the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Knoll Drive, and the northbound/ ► For the Fanno Creek Trail Crossing,there are southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Hwy multiple opportunities to improve the safety 99. The most likely of these to be eliminated for people walking and biking. One or more would be at Hall Boulevard/Knoll Drive. RRFBs may be more effective than the existing pedestrian hybrid beacon. Depending on ► The most constrained area is the central the bikeway design, curb extensions may be segment between the Fanno Creek Trail possible to reduce the crossing distance for Crossing and Highway 99. Expanding right-of- pedestrians. There may also be space for a way between Burnham Street and the railroad refuge island. may best come from the City's public works property. ► The future bikeway along Hall Boulevard has the potential to create safe connections to ► There is a significant amount of space on the other major links in the bicycle network. First, Highway 217 bridge that could be repurposed the future Fanno Creek Trail extension on the for more protected biking and walking facilities. southeast corner of Hall Boulevard/Durham ► The intersection of Highway 99 and Hall Road will need to be accommodated in the Boulevard is a key intersection in Tigard and is visioning plan. Durham Road, Sattler Street, currently challenging to navigate while walking Bonita Road, McDonald Street, Commercial Street, Hunziker Street, Oak Street, and and biking, and could benefit from improved facilities. Locust Street are all designated major street bikeways. Bike turn boxes and advanced queuing facilities should be considered at these intersections to help people riding bikes make turns to and from those corridors. ► The section of Hall Boulevard between Langtree Street and Ashford Street is particularly wide. If the rest of the corridor isn't widened to match this width,then the extra space here could be repurposed into a more highly protected bikeway, stormwater catchment basin, or both. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS This page intentionally left blank. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 27 L , ,. • \ 1 -�, t.. K 1 ..*. .• . ji._. r yr ) . „it ,... , , I, 1 r `p• a.1.$' b .,,� • 2 — • • . • ,A.' �,'„ �K :`;-ate' ,' a 'f `i l 4 `�L s� :'i` 1-....„ tits 2.; V I • v G/ ,3/41$. I r ..c _ ..• . `r•_, .' '_'_ _h� . .5( ,,i-- SS 1. k. ,, ‘ _ ,-i , 1._ „No\Iit.. .-. , . I: % \11 Arr t, \\I --- -.••• \c\°'\ ...... _.ae^."""',"/2 ....„ f ��:4L ‘' '.,\.- ) '‘'''' E,,hat,.Pew, r\�- ` ! f� �r \L ( ( ; .• lv I n I �/ I;bvwv� vier/ \ 7 N. / --/ - •� ��; �j. � Y ��t 4. *Monthly check-ins and project updates with PLANNING PROCESS the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee were held throughout the process. r..6%) 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS In the summer of 2022,the project team began the corridor visioning project with a comprehensive existing conditions analysis.*This involved inspecting the roadway,compiling past plan recommendations,research,and data analysis.The findings are summarized in the next section,and the full report can be found in the appendix of this document. 2. STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS •:":to In the fall of the same year,the project team conducted a series of virtual stakeholder meetings to • develop a more robust understanding of the issues and experiences people have while traveling 11111010 • along Hall Boulevard.The first meeting engaged leaders from each of the schools within a quarter • mile of the corridor and discussed how Hall either facilitates or hinders school-based travel. • The second meeting brought multiple government agencies to the table to identify the ways in • which Hall Boulevard impacts the delivery of their services.The third meeting brought together • community members who are involved in various advisory committees or non-profit organizations • with interests in the corridor.The findings from these meetings were incorporated into the existing • conditions report. Finally,the project team additional outreach at the El Tigre Festival in October • to alert people of the upcoming open house. • • 3. OPEN HOUSE 1 AND ONLINE PUBLIC INPUT MAP • The first public open house for the corridor visioning project was held the evening of November 16,2022.The purpose of the open house was to share findings from the existing conditions analysis and to hear directly from community members about their experiences traveling along Hall Boulevard.The public was also invited to provide comments on an online mapping tool that was open for two weeks after the open house,to allow for input from people who were not able to attend the meeting.The mapping tool allowed users to submit general comments about the project and draw points and lines on the map relating to destinations and the barriers they face. This feedback served as a complement to the more data-driven existing conditions analysis and was used to improve the project team's understanding of the corridor. • : 4. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT • During the winter months of 2022-2023,the project team used feedback from the first open • -V% •• house to develop various concepts for Hall Boulevard.The team compiled various roadway configurations that could be implemented at varying degrees of impact to the public right-of-way. The team developed these concepts while also balancing other factors,such as emphasizing bikeway connections to key amenities along the corridor,strategic spacing of pedestrian crossings,and considering where vehicle congestion occurs along the corridor.This process resulted in an aspirational cross section for Hall Boulevard along four key segments of its extent. These cross sections,in addition to single-location improvement recommendations,were referred to as the proposed concepts. • 5. OPEN HOUSE 2 AND PUBLIC INPUT MAP • In the spring of 2023,the project team hosted an in-person open house at the Tigard Town Hall to gather feedback on the proposed concepts.Like the fall open house,the spring open house also included an online input map that participants could submit comments on for up to two weeks. This feedback was used to refine the concepts further and modify some of • the recommendations. 6. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT:CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I PLANNING PROCESS 29 Key Takeaways from Public Engagement Efforts The following themes emerged from the individual stories, ideas, and recommendations we received What We Heard throughout our stakeholder interviews, open houses, and public outreach: "I drive south on Hall to the library, usually accompanied by small kids. If there were ► There are limited crossing opportunities, a more protected bike lane, we could bike especially near bus stops. there." — Participant comment from Open House#1 ► Visibility issues — lighting needs improvement, especially for people who ride transit. "Contiguous sidewalks from Durham to downtown are crucial. We live in 79th/ ► There are multiple sidewalk gaps, which makes Ashford neighborhood with kids and it hard for families to access the library, parks, pets and walking up Hall toward the city and schools. and library or south toward the parks is difficult and dangerous (Fanno Creek Trail ► People drive too fast, especially a concern for from Bonita is not always reliable or lit students walking and biking to school. and doesn't always feel safe. STRONGLY support sidewalks, more lighting, brush ► The current bicycle facilities do not provide enforcement and perhaps a couple more enough separation from traffic. lit crosswalks on South Hall."— Participant ► The Fanno Creek Bridge is too narrow to comment from Open House#2 accommodate all modes. "[In regard to the proposed protected ► Highway 99 and Hall Boulevard is a intersection at Locust St]This is a route challenging intersection to navigate while to an elementary school, so a protected walking and biking. intersection here will make children a lot safer." — Participant comment from ► Much of the congestion on Hall Boulevard Open House#2 between Bonita Road and McDonald Street can be attributed to people traveling east- "NB Hall to WB McDonald regularly backs west along these roads, as there isn't a similar up in the center median to the church, sometimes almost near Bonita. Lengthen alternative in this direction. the signal please! SB Hall and WB/EB McDonald here never really back up that badly,they can wait an extra 30 seconds to clear the turn pocket." — Participant comment from Open House#2 • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS . . Y SWAMI .Holm.rrs;ri- i Q 4 Thank you L*1• ..,.at participating! A 4 n- • 0 The aislrngcondrronsmmnknrpeiddre Q now over However•rrlere wile be more ❑ • - fpoaees ro comeenrs m future pha mases of he Heusaurt�adca as msianing aroy•cl. Legend r,i r.... a eN earths r. For more information... t ci Daetlnatkna visit fie protect website by alleging kers, MIST!no ❑ , 0 eys�. 4 ❑ • - - .. Project Corridor 5W9nwaP �I .. esead Bike lane s • s ttaih 8 -. . , tow i .ssawsi is 1r Above:the online mapping tool from the first round of public engagement. The first open house asked participants to provide comments on the destinations they travel to along Hall Boulevard and the barriers they face. This feedback helped support the existing conditions analysis. dauE CROIECCW015IIE SW n Malmo Ras D' I CI How to comment "" ,e rd Ra m We want heel' thoughts on lie proposed Sw s .•i .- 3. �l i 1 1r improremems Ice Hall Baule'rard!These Improvements are intended m address concerns we I N : (=l.— • 1•••:, heard in fie fir5l open house regarding access, ,ry n..,...i..�.P.. �' I y connectivity.safety.and mobility for people walking, • j ary • swwem.,n SA bikinq•taking transit,or driving along the corridor. 5 • - shyr°jh� l:' I - You can browse the map inane of two ways: "' - ±rvw>a H" • .. — s i 6 r Legend r 13 #k € IA pick Shemarkers mills Milt to loam more about ' :•.: ..,i•••.•.. .....,., ,i ..,I n.,,....;.: • the facilities,and vote and comment. ' 0 ear Stops y� . .. — 1 [e nnw•, . al.r Pacmu lg,aaan 'F © ' ?_ • l Bi Seler i an inrmorocrion Prom the table Below. / �' geroresxd Iwereeer . 'let Leced•n lrnprevern et type I ki Traffic Signal rdx. stemma!or Hwy 99 xeconnaw'anon tr rnAanrM cre[Slna 01111.1.11Ti •-c nn.o. RpmrsI CI aleytle-Pe0w,lrlaneallrctCrcrsdng a'6 ^�l 7 . Knoll CO Re[oringuallon 1 '•• l ncc.0 uan.p.manr Locust SI Prrretttd IrinssICllon Toioal Cross-Section Along This Extent ..w v,.•,0.v. ,�� WWI55 C,nrurwl Imaraw^.Itip si rt-of.Way Conslrllntc ,yis & — 4 n,Id.dPr>Kct 1 y W ax.a., enemtohome rinrshed — Field , ; g .. sural .1 • .. ,Iiii mib st •ii[ ... :aai.se.+i Above:the online mapping tool from the second round of public engagement. The second open house asked participants to respond to the proposed improvements and design concepts for the corridor. This feedback helped to refine the proposed improvements and design concepts. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I PLANNING PROCESS 31 • 1 III ..., . ...— . . . ..••• . •-2 •'' 4i.-:-' '•' - ..r ;' , . _.., ,., • ‘ - ' vp. .'", .", .•, . ,4 '' •; ‘-'" -.''' :!.r4,-; '4-, %.',;:trq'z4.'...- '111 i-;. ..,..,. -; •-,:..LL - -"Y'.?$;-„ - " lift '4 .,&_,.. ...01,,, j'Aai_.,'.' ,ik f",_.:,..-1-• -0.-, .: v,:•• •... . •_ - 7 :. •' . - '• ,' ' .''' ...,:..i....-,4Z;• •• ..,t-',11.,.- oi-•:=„,_ _..., .h...,.i- '-', ',• ,,: --.-iw: . 4 • 4.'''''' 4 p,A._ ,,F, _ .f '•,.- • '.....-4.;...' . ... -"• ,'•,,:- ,;- re,cktii..; -...or '...' ' -' ...`s 'L-• ,- -,.... gr= ,il -..).';0.1.re44.41.i/- 4.:' d--;."--',•-4.--.. 4 ''11." d Ill'.'i 4.. 17111:i.:.";1 Alf?%.41#.„Ai:-PIV.;•;715:,..-.'..-, d'''' P ' '-Ar ,. .. v., • -..ft„-.,4,,, : . . ,It ,.L.4„i 1,,,,",!,-,,,itr. , - . , , ,,,, 4%, ,;- 4 ', .i ....ill •Lc •'• 1" •, ,.....,....1.,.......".Nrii_-,,,,...r.,3,....4•• '.....b' :,.....";.,..,...1..d..,-,....ro i•:::'. d ....,4 i XI,rd?"0....Art:. 1...• ,ed , ; *1....C, .''''t'..; . :1 ,'..,:,' .Z'.•'2.- 40:4."lir' .'r'' . ' •••;-=a. _-1-_ •-- ' ". ' - •. . '' , '•;,.:4:k... • •@- • L„L._ ,_; , ,. ..„-,,..7"k i-Pt, •-'4;.::,...r.',1:-." ....- . .•"- ' - '• ,.. .. .. , •. ,.:, , .. .• .;. . .. , 1: 1:1:A-.• ,,•-• .': ' '• - li;•,__L.41••••- - ,... 7-".: _ ...-4-...;-1,-"'-.44--,- . • • • , - , ''vt: .'- - . T .. „........—.. __, .6 , .. ''' 4,...-• ,:. -• •-L'1'''•-•. - " .. .," _ " '0491't ' ''‘,0. -•••''r 41:-; -4t4- ' - • • AtriE4p..- ,....,sly.r-, ."...:•-•„-_, s, ,..: • A r',P.O.; ... :- :. . Ill _ , ,A. , * .r.-' 4- - • •• L' : :'4101,ikd....'' ' ,.. :d' i'L-.711111,' ,;., . .1.' •-.40..,.''.46...• 3,',.. .1._ 'rr-cf- °# 7:.•:.•. . 4 ... , . -. , ,, • ' •2•':.•--e;-,:lt LL;-;41,‘ '' . ' -- ',/,' ,i"..bir'' ...-.- '' '•:•• . • • '•4 '14- i te . -,:•*,dt- :4'". -, ' -...11•5.'• '- ,LI . • •..• '' it' ••• L. .: t 4 • . ,....e .-*'•"'.... All.:+. .r' . ...'''•4.... ...". ,4 _ , '''''''•.7. :.., • . '. • :.' ' -:;•1.)ii,.::‘'.,,:.'4", _ ,., , ' _ - --, -,-.:'...';''''....:%A.,-;'-': .-..4r- • , ......,;;. ..u...•••',-'-i.::••,,, .44r,, :4;•••':‘ . .-e L-it,,L ... -, -.,.....;,,,... ...,,i‘op .:,... .. ., -- ---, ,N, _iff.,--..:,:r4,.,:-4t, , .„•,-.. . ,. . --...,--.,:-.. riA_:,c,4f..,-.--L-,4-: r.. ' '46.• . 4.114"LI ,i_NPL '.'-: '':-., 4--:;4; L:.r'''''.4‘!44,4,.!:1'.,"_ :, . , • -4.,„p' -47-.•c,y,,,; •.,.,•tv::4,.,,,!•:_-.10....4.,, • ...7.-..,y•-•• , -- t 'I. - - _-, .., L ,i.,..-L d -'\I'd 4•- - .-it. • . --•.' -.t4• .W.' • • ,---..' .-- '',:,••••7.., -•:!:3"_ -,. •••! , •--. -' • : , F..4v-.. , ._ • .:: , -'L.:':.•''.: it.''..,'';',...4,' ';'.L.. ' '• flr'4...:'.'n -.d...,_, , '-d: '• ''.5i,iP., ,-4' . ,', ' . •. ..,.,F; ..'r''''A,,• .1.,..4.......,,,, ,....'1.1-.-r • iF.41A.i' .. ' .... . ' . '..i.'-', •*-7-s.r.:4:';'•1 *. ' L',7 '-•-• . ' .,• N i •-• . 7":1_-,1 ,'' _ .. -1.: . ."i • - - - -__A.-_,,.., '' - • - • .— -4 :._ . — .,._., • , ... . ...I.; . _., ^---+.-x3--- -' •,-..=-...4`4, , r._ -,0,4•-• - ." '•-'....,.._,. -.-.',S .. - ..... .._ ., ..: '.1*....',%:' _ - , "L•';'_• -_ - _'-.,• -.'1.,-;*';'.;-...:4-71tL• ,_,Ya.---.'4arie -• —qv,,.. %-.• f ' I -• ..-...-„,, - _ 01..A. --• - 44 1 • -,- L." -' • • ' ' '' - ' ••,1 -•-1„ .. . -• • - '7••\‘ ! .... _ _......_.,-, -.,.....1,,. ,....___ .;_,•..... --_-4,-.,?-7.--44-- A. _ . .._ . ,. __ _,......,„.........,. ...,.r.„..,:. ....__...., , ,, ,... ._ ,..,:_i„... .....,..„ • . . _ __,_ .... .. _ ,• ..., • .._ , ___....... / ..„ ..,..... . ....., ,,. „ _. . . . ,...... _... .., . .... d• ' ''•,.f: ".: .” '.' A • '1.4''''il! d :I. .. " • .-- • .--.--- - d L•. ' •-.--. '': X,,..' _ • ? • t.:Jo,,-_, • '''--'5...- ,4/...„/-'......- • , i "- ••r•-,.,-:.,..-&-r;/4 ''•:---...1,••• •.. L' •-'1-0,- .' ., •••; .'.• • - • „ • • .. - „,,, -'•-• .;er.14,"ri.L'-V--.."-- ' '"'•1.4",,a7_,?jk 4fivZ•.‘f.„4:4i'.1.1.•,•*,,Aiptf...,41.-..' •,...q... ,^.. - - '', 'V - -4.'.:11,• '‘A•••• c:,. '1.4,. - ---.. -•,.• --.” -14'.... .,-4.4.--.Y.'0'4 Le, -. .4.14t.F,:rv,i,',.-.:,,4,1,•'F',,,,,,,„ '''':''' -‘•'-'':L'•:•••-":.;.p'-;,:t :..'4A,_ ' '.. '.... 44., :4,),,:sta-r'-,..,--,-,.,--;:'-,•-.:., , ,,. -...., -,-, ,:.f-t),:.••, .,-,. '4:4440-eti4-0,lag4ta,---- -,r.:::: :'2....4.:ti.:- -\--,-:,A,,..,,.,.z..:::,'•;,_ -,,,••.:,- ;4,!' f.'v'4-....-• ..› - '1.•'''- ',1,''.'..".•':!.•_.:,'-.0-,,;,.'.,:_i:I.:_. .-.,-.•'.,...-. .,,,. ...,:*,-..N.... 5. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS From Plan to Project: Throughline from recognized best practices2 in transportation planning the TSP and will advance the City's stated goals and policies. As noted in the City's TSP, "Transportation planning The recommendations assume that the roadway in Tigard is shaped by both opportunities and footprint will need to be expanded in order to constraints. Projected growth over the next 20 accommodate all modes, and in places where right- years, both in Tigard and throughout the region, will of-way acquisition is not possible, will deviate from increase travel demand and associated congestion, the typical cross section. The recommendations but increasing roadway capacity is unlikely to solve also assume that they will be completed in phases in these problems. coordination with ODOT funding per the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement(IGA). Tigard's Strategic Vision emphasizes developing a multimodal transportation system that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone. To achieve High-Level Concept Shaped by City this vision,the focus has shifted to strengthening Values and Public Input connections, access, and opportunities for all The proposed vision for a typical cross section residents with a strong emphasis on equity, safety, along Hall Boulevard is to maintain the two general and multimodal accommodation, particularly for travel lanes with a center turn lane, and expand the walking,transit, and bicycling. total roadway footprint to include consistent, grade separated walking and biking facilities, pedestrian- This shift recognizes that our streets play host to scale lighting, enhanced bus stops, and tree canopy more than just cars. We can do this by reviewing (see rendering on following page). speed limits; completing the system for walking and bicycling; and making the most of 2-3 lane Within each study segment,this cross section will cross sections where planned five-lane sections vary slightly,with the north segment being the most would drastically increase costs while negatively constrained spatially, and the central segments impacting neighborhoods and conditions for active building in additional features to connect key transportation."' destinations in those areas. In addition to typical proposed cross sections for each study segment,the A New Vision for Hall Boulevard following pages detail recommended improvements for specific intersections, including traffic signal The following recommendations integrate the changes, curb reconfigurations, and crossing information gathered by the project team through enhancements. Detailed descriptions of each our existing conditions analysis, which were improvement can be found in the recommendations refined through public input. They reflect nationally table at the end of the chapter. 1 Tigard On the Move:City of Tigard Transportation 2 Guidelines for Designing Livable Steets and Trails. System Plan. Chapter 4 Modal Plans. Pg 23.2022. Metro 2020. https://wwworegonmetro.gov/tools-partners/ guides-and-tools/guidelines-designing-livable-streets-and- trails HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 33 A NEW VISION FOR HALL BOULEVARD cr. Sidewalk BiFa Trees•5: Common Lane Two Way Left Tum Common Lane_ treesBM Sidexalk 62„ 4.5h Sls Sfl 4n I"-"' Ift 128 1 ft s 4N 6N R• '. t w • r 11• .44 • Above: The proposed vision for a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard is to maintain the two general travel lanes with a center turn lane, and expand the total roadway footprint to include consistent,grade separated walking and biking facilities, pedestrian-scale lighting, enhanced bus stops and tree canopy ► Consistent: Each segment will feature two ► During detailed design and engineering phases, travel lanes with a center turn lane study alternative intersection treatments such as roundabouts at all signalized intersections to prioritize safety and traffic flow for all modes. ► Multimodal: Continuous biking and walking facilities, improved transit stops, enhanced ► The vision assumes that the roadway footprint will crossings need to be expanded in order to accommodate all modes, and in places where right-of-way acquisition is not possible, deviate from the typical cross section. ► Environmentally sound: Street trees and stormwater infrastructure throughout ► The recommendations also assume that they will be completed in phases in coordination with ODOT funding per the terms of the memorandum of understanding. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The recommendations in this chapter are organized r into four study segments, due to the need to break the central segment into two parts. The north L: Hall Boulevard ■ segment is from Locust Street to Highway 99. The LO ST sr n `- - first central segment, Central A, is from Highway 99 co Z I to Commercial Street. The second central segment is 11/ OAK ST f t from Commercial Street to Omara Street. The fourth cD 6,41, North Segment-; study segment is the South segment,from Omara 4,4, Street to Durham Road. APPLEBY I The proposed improvements along these extents have slight variations due to their land use context, Iavailable right-of-way, location of utilities, and HWY 99 ✓ proximity to key destinations. r Central Segment(A) �' General Recommendations 44 '• . Q Maximize tree canopy to the extent possible.This includes zplanting in the center median when the center turn lane is L.L, ( not needed. / N It .• Ce�ral Segment(B) ,r ) . 11„„. \ f . . Utilize permeable pavements where possible. J • \ Maximize pedestrian-scale lighting along the corridor and prioritize bus stops. MCDONALD ST i , k _ Identify locations for stormwater treatment facilities and a __ allocate sufficient funding to their design. T BONITA RD I. o An enhanced crossing facility would use high-visibility • I I South Segment continental crosswalk markings'and appropriate signage. w Potential improvements could include pedestrian refuge BATTLER STa islands, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions, i 1 v advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting. • Implement designs at driveway entrances that minimize Yconflicts between cars and people walking and biking. DURHAM RD • • (ex:moving access to side streets over time through 11111 ^ redevelopment and/or consolidating access to minimize the number of driveways and turning movements.) I ( I ` 0 0,25 ,-0.5 MILES N Illor J ,i1, 1 High-visibility crosswalks(sometimes called "continental-style"crosswalks)have thick lines parallel to traffic flow that allow drivers to see the crosswalk from further away. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 35 Segment and Perspective Views NORTH SEGMENT PROJECT CI LANDAU ST LU Q 1� L--CUST ST z Locust Street - ;; I 00 Protected Intersection wxt. a t w• • • • • • North Segment: MAPLELEAF ST> �' > = Locust Street to Highway 99* oo a I— I o F oo oo 2K ST • Oak Street Enhanced Crossing Opportunity ti ' PINE ST r SPRUCE 3 Spruce Street Enhanced Crossing Opportunity Future public park 4 • • • •STEVE ST . Steve Street . i . ' Enhanced crossing opportunity LU LU >>y .•r > a with potential implementation of a a 4-4.1i a N_ 1- rectangular rapid flashing beacon 41, 4;cft-i a cc CO (RRFB). co f,- • t-- Li, 5 PFAFFLE ST Pfaffle Street _ .., School Traffic Signal I- 0 w . . Cr, Q ,� . : -. :1: ,-,, i 9 a • Route 78 Bus Stop North of > Highway 99 = 6 Right-of-Way Constraints r-00 0 G\F�GN PP "To see more details about these 71.1.5 recommendations,see the full 8 N recommendations table at the end of this chapter. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS l i L r -. L - •' •...w `.1 ENHANCED CROSSING WITH SAFTEY .- "-' • �_- ISLAND AND RECTANGULAR RAPID . - k •:. _ --- FLASHING DEACONS r44 � .:. '~ CONSISTENT WAYFINDING - -" -''. .- - - • _ SIGNAGE ALONG ROUTE - 11 .tkI 1 I' ,11 c �;a " i.rte /71F--flt- �� -Ammo, 6 FT SEPARATED AND �� ■ • RAISED BINE LANES . .$� I. NORTH SEGMENT CROSS SECTION Locust Street to Highway 99 The north segment of the Hall Boulevard NORTH FACING corridor visioning project extends from Locust Street to Highway 99.Today, the typical cross section found on Hall Boulevard along this extent includes two - general traffic lanes with a center turn 1�1i- . I idroP'�� lane.There are intermittent sidewalks and �/ substandard (<6ft)striped grade-level bike -.►' lanes.The proposed vision for a typical I �� r:► 7 cross section along Hall Boulevard in 7411 the north segment is to maintain the two I ICIO+ general traffic lanes with a center turn lane, and expand the total roadway footprint to 80ft wide to include consistent,grade Note that some locations such as the rendering of separated walking and biking facilities, Spruce St and Hall Blvd shown above, will deviate pedestrian-scale lighting and tree canopy. slightly from the typical cross section as needed. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 37 CENTRAL SEGMENT (A) , , PROJECT 0 co ; s '4. . 7 " _ • Highway 99 m -8 i ! s Protected Intersection i s 1 I. -A . Highway 99 N el's- G ;Y < Remove Slip Lane ilf 9 :, South of Highway 99 " +'_ Driveway access improvements •— i 1 ` • Central A Segment: `. • Highway 99 to Commercial Street* '. slc, • Knoll Drive ox,x>,/, Enhanced crossing opportunity ,s, 11. JIM* 10 ' with potential implementation of a rectangular rapid flashing beacon 11 I (RRFB). cr DowntowTigard n 6-1 • Knoll Drive rM " = Remove Northbound Right Turn Lane P •dr` \)- 12 ' $ Scoffins Street r- i v i kF Traffic Signal Changes and 2 . 7' Intersection Realignment. Study °o, , r Future Southwest feasibility of roundabout. '�F Corridor Light �ci9 Rail Station 13 ` :4• Commercial Street r `' Enhanced Crossing Opportunity ,r',;4:,7 "To see more details about these Orecommendations,see the full N recommendations table at the end of this chapter. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CENTRAL SEGMENT (A) CROSS SECTION NORTH FACING VAIN Mar NI t dna �t l I Hwy 99 to Commercial Street The central segment of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project extends from Highway 99 to Tigard Public Library. Today,the typical cross section found on Hall Boulevard along this extent includes two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane.There are intermittent sidewalks and substandard(<6ft)striped grade-level bike lanes.The proposed vision for a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard in the central segment is to maintain the two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane where needed,and expand the total roadway footprint to 90ft wide to include consistent, grade separated walking and biking facilities, pedestrian-scale lighting,and tree canopy. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 39 CENTRAL SEGMENT (B) cod PROJECT S T 1 14 Commercial Street Traffic Signal 15' • RR Crossing Bicycle-Pedestrian Railroad Crossing Proposed west side shared-use -: path extent BURNHA 16 • • Burnham Street • Right-of-Way Constraints • City Hall South of Burnham Street a' s Driveway access improvements 1111t: Irifilf•*‘ • • Central B Segment: Commercial Street to Omara Fanno Creek Street* Trail —* I Fanno Creek Park Fanno Creek Bridge Fanno Creek r • Bridge replacement to House —� accommodate all modes • Omara Street Tigard Enhanced crossing opportunity Library with potential implementation of a l l rectangular rapid flashing beacon OMARA ST (RRFB). "To see more details about these 4 recommendations,see the full N recommendations table at the end of this chapter. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS — . M "' a \ yam'.+ :t •'i �I - y :� -' i,= - 1, r' ENHANCED CROSSING WITH :t} _7.11- _ 4116i. •E . ' 1- ! X PEDESTRIAN HYBRID SIGNALS • '�.- • ` ■• g�`/�' f .`i r •-• r --. • • BENCHES WITH A .�•-'� - - --• :I '_.-.... INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE CREEK SIDE VIEW - —'�.E, - i 'tel. . �' WOODRUFF BRIDGE •�•L1:.i. .1..:-..:4;r„ • CONNECTION '-' y 'y • .A Y - �p rw _ a. ^'t" _ fera s`Y �e i • G �. +wM ' � F'011 -�F . rE' r •,',1, 1 i • --=-- •....,e ar..n•.4 .. % WIDE SIDEWALKS gignoppga, `'.': TWO-WAY RAISED WAYFINDING SIGNAGE r •Agif BIKE TRACT[ 0 y i I Commercial Street to Omara Street CENTRAL SEGMENT(B)CROSS SECTION The central segment of the Hall Boulevard NORTH FACING Corridor Visioning Project extends from Highway 99 to Tigard Public Library.Today, the typical cross section found on Hall ill Boulevard along this extent includes two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane.There are intermittent sidewalks and ! leir P'40974, !!' a substandard (<6ft)striped grade-level bike lanes.The proposed vision for a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard k„ i, in the central segment south of the future sl�� Southwest MAX Light Rail Station is to maintain the two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane,and expand the total roadway footprint to 90ft wide to include a shared-use path on the west side, pedestrian-scale lighting,and tree canopy. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 41 SOUTH SEGMENT 19 PROJECT 0 . is 4.., :fL. %iii ._ T Fanno Creek "!20 trail • Wall Street 1, Enhanced Crossing Opportunity 4,, ,,,, . 1 ii .... Between Regina Ln and Fanno 21 Jo ,,frokiri Creek Drive 4 .1- NOC,F, Enhanced crossing opportunity '•_ y .4•ii -r-s)3withpotential implementation of a J ,� rectangular rapid flashing beacon z - (RRFB). )ONALD ST +. 22 ,g . • McDonald Street V- ' ' - Protected Intersection, Traffic 1 ,, Signal Improvements. Study COLONY CREEK CT feasibility of roundabout. g • South A Segment: E'...", Omara St to Durham Road* . Fit, • GREENSWARD LN Vic' 23} - ''• Vci S4NN0W • Greenswald Ln w •10 j Enhanced crossing opportunity a with potential implementation of a Hrectangular rapid flashing beacon co ' Ai" , 1, (RRFB). ST ti,i. ,-T 24, • •BONITARO Bonita Road r w Protected Intersection, Traffic --83RD CT Signal Improvements. Study F - il y ps_._ feasibility of roundabout. • To see more details about these { + 4 e) recommendations,see the full JEBROOK ST ;^; r25 rt' recommendations table at the end of this chapter. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH SEGMENT (CONTINUED) L PROJECT 0 TX25 q South of Pinebrook Street Right-of-Way Constraints w + MURDOCK ST H ,26 'e Murdock Street SCHECKLA DR o a Enhanced crossing opportunity zcc with potential implementation of a 9r41 414 rectangular rapid flashing beacon MATTHEW PARK ST "� (RRFB). A ,,, - t� •mo_"' i LAI South B Segment: (` a Omara Street to Durham N Road* ;fiT_ ROSS ST :; • +._f ATTLER ST � � Sattler Street ii ,, '�. ti Protected Intersection 4,54 i� 5.F a. � m s KENTON DR =LOWER ST 33-1 I • • Ashford Street r-) e `' ! Enhanced crossing opportunity • with potential implementation of a a E �.+x'"1111 1 .f. rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB). ASHFORD ST • South of Ashford Street •i rLANGTREE ST Right-of-Way Constraints HAMLET ST A w Q • ' ' .4 Z • Avon Street N 00 Enhanced crossing opportunity BONAVENTURE LN with potential implementation of a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB). AVON ST ) o Cook • Durham Road School ZPark • Sch000l Protected Intersection / /•I/ !" .li ,I/ y` To see more details about these DURHAM RD 4 recommendations,see the full N recommendations table at the end of this chapter. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 43 SOUTH SEGMENT CROSS SECTION NORTH FACING 4. , 111 -1 Omara Street to Durham Road The south segment of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project extends from Tigard Public Library to Durham Road. Today,the typical cross section found on Hall Boulevard along this extent includes two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane.There are intermittent sidewalks and substandard(<6ft)striped grade-level bike lanes.The proposed vision for a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard in the south segment is to maintain the two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane, and expand the total roadway footprint to 90ft wide to include consistent,grade separated walking and biking facilities, pedestrian-scale lighting,and tree canopy. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Why Three Lanes? Wouldn't More Lanes Be Better? In each study segment,the proposed typical cross section for Hall Boulevard offers a three lane cross section (two general traffic lanes and center turn lane). In our outreach, a handful of people expressed concern that the City isn't widening Hall Boulevard in anticipation of future growth. Here's why the concept plan calls for maintaining three lanes: A THREE LANE STREET.. ...is consistent with the 2040 TSP which ...has fewer private property impacts. plans for a future 3-lane section. ► ...allows for pedestrian refuge islands ► ...easily accommodates up to between and shorter crossing distances. Crossing 20-22k Average Daily Traffic and Hall Blvd a five-lane roadway introduces new carries between 13-17k Average Daily Traffic safety challenges, especially for people today. with disabilities, children, and seniors. Specifically,when people cross two or ► ...is not unlikely to worsen congestion. more lanes of traffic,they are especially Increasing the number of lanes in a roadway vulnerable to vehicles in the innermost induces demand,where travel times lanes whose sightlines are blocked by the temporarily decrease but then increase vehicles stopped in the outermost lane. again as more traffic routes onto the newly This is known as the multiple threat issue. built lanes. ...frees up more space in the public right- • ...supports more multimodal infrastructure of-way for higher quality walking and which improves both the safety and biking facilities, as well as trees and storm overall capacity of the roadway. Providing water infrastructure. sidewalks and bike lanes which have smaller footprints but are more efficient at moving ► ...is in line with the City's stated priorities. people increases capacity without adding The City of Tigard is committed to travel lanes.As a gateway to downtown, creating a well-connected, attractive, and schools, parks, and the library, Hall accessible pedestrian network. Its plans Boulevard should be designed for people in and policies call for improved walkability, addition to car throughput. safety, accessibility, carbon responsibility, and multimodal transportation on its ► ...is less costly to build and maintain. streets. ► ...makes accessing businesses along Hall Boulevard by walking and rolling more pleasant. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 45 Key Intersections LOCUST STREET ,, t. t.14i0,-",,.e.(7 ' '.." e )1 Pl•4 P '. " . 1111114L. r- v1/4 1,t.1 } Iry r r 1 _ " ?.- --Z r-, 02, 1,. _F-- ...:: 1 / / ''./ C:Thi.. ) . '''''' ' .-;; .../25 f/ - . 1 PROTECTED 11-1 11. ., it 1 ' ... bit (- ` '-'7--j4 . / /ir INTERSECTION Illustration of a protected intersection design for Hall Boulevard/Locust Street. Description Outcome As the terminus for the Hall Boulevard corridor in Protected intersections create shorter, simpler Tigard, Locust St serves as an important intersection crossings, more predictable movements, and for local businesses as well as students accessing better visibility between people on bikes and Metzger Elementary School. This intersection people driving. As a result,the intersection is more is one of a handful of intersections along Hall comfortable and safer for people using the bikeway Boulevard recommended to be reconstructed as a and the crosswalk. protected intersection. NM O I Clear Sight Distance 1 No Stopping/No Standing 1 3 i lig,\ 4 1 \/ y • <?') I I. q, 2 Left:Design guidance for V ' protected intersections. Source:NACTO 2023 • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS HUNZIKER-SCOFFINS �_ � - IS - L..i- -- _ .J r SY. PIS - ------ --- 41410. -4, .- f f The Hunziker-Scoffins intersection is offset, creating mobility challenges for all modes. Description Outcome Today,the intersection of Scoffins Street and Realigning the intersection will offer the City an Hunziker Street is offset, creating a complicated opportunity to simplify and improve the intersection intersection that is difficult to navigate for all modes. for people walking, biking, driving, and taking the Long crossing distances, substandard bike lanes, bus. The realignment would also allow for a more and multiple traffic signals are a few of the reasons seamless transition for the Southwest Corridor light why long-range plans call for this intersection to rail line into downtown Tigard. be realigned (see Tigard's TSP: Project ID S-25). Additionally,this intersection will need to be intersection operations will need to be improved. if the Southwest Corridor light rail is built, due to its proximity to the planned alignment. This plan recommends rebuilding the intersection as a protected intersection, or studying the possibility for a roundabout. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 47 Recommendations Table ID Location Category Recommendation 1 Locust St Protected Intersection Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people driving. 2 Oak St Enhanced Crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity.An enhanced crossing facility would use Opportunity high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and appropriate signage. Potential improvements could include,leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting. 3 Spruce St Enhanced Crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity.An enhanced crossing facility would use Opportunity high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and appropriate signage. Potential improvements could include pedestrian refuge islands, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting.This recommendation aligns with an ODOT project:SW Hall Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Improvements SW Hemlock Street and SW Spruce Street? 4 Steve St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 5 Pfaffle St Traffic Signal A new traffic signal at Hall Boulevard and Pfaffle St has been funded.This recommendation is to further enhance the pedestrian crossings,such as high-visibility continental crosswalks on all three legs of the intersection, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,and additional lighting. Funded in the FY23-24 budget.See 95054 Hall Boulevard Pfaffle St New Traffic Signal.(Funding source:Transportation Development Tax, Transportation SDC)page 204.See also:TSP Project S-22,page 90. 6 Route 78 Bus Stop Right-of-Way This area is too narrow for the typical cross section to fit.Special design North of Highway Constraints considerations will be needed to accommodate all modes.until such time 99 that adjacent properties redevelop. 1 OR 141:SW Hall Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Improvements SW Hemlock Street and SW Spruce Street. More information here:https://www.oregon.gov/odot/projects/pages/project-details.aspx?project=22647 • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ID Location Category Recommendation 7 Hwy 99 Protected Intersection Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people driving. 8 Hwy 99 Remove Slip Lane Signal timing improvements,improved crosswalks at the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Highway 99.A complete removal is proposed for the right turn slip lane on Highway 99 on the southwest corner of the intersection. This would allow for safer pedestrian crossings to the south side of the intersection and improve the access to downtown. 9 South of Highway Access Management An access restriction and/or intersection reconfiguration is proposed at 99 this location to reduce conflicts for turning vehicles and improve traffic flow on Hall Boulevard.This could include blocking vehicle access completely, restricting vehicle turning movements to"right-in,right-out",or using signage to partially restrict access to one direction. 10 Knoll Dr Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 11 Knoll Dr Remove Northbound Removal of northbound right turn lane is proposed at the intersection of Right Turn Lane Hall Boulevard and Knoll Dr to reduce conflicts and increase separation for people walking and biking. 12 Scoffins St Traffic Signal Changes The intersection of Hall Boulevard and Hunziker Rd will be reconfigured and Intersection to align with Scoffins St.These changes will require traffic signal Realignment. changes.Consider a protected intersection design.See Tigard's 2040 Study feasibility of Transportation System Plan project S-25 on page 91.Additionally,study roundabout. the potential for implementing a roundabout at this location during the engineering and design phase. 13 Commercial St Enhanced Crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity.An enhanced crossing facility would use Opportunity high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and appropriate signage. Potential improvements could include pedestrian refuge islands, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting. 14 Commercial St Traffic Signal New traffic signal at Hall Boulevard and Commercial St. Include high- visibility continental crosswalks on all three legs of the intersection. 15 RR Crossing Bicycle-Pedestrian Construct a pedestrian and bicycle rail road crossing perpendicular to the Railroad Crossing railway. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 49 ID Location Category Recommendation 16 Burnham St Right-of-Way This recommendation is to further enhance the pedestrian crossings,by Constraints including high-visibility continental crosswalks on all three legs of the intersection,leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,and additional lighting. 17 South of Burnham Access Management An access restriction and/or intersection reconfiguration for is proposed at St this location to reduce conflicts for turning vehicles and improve traffic flow on Hall Boulevard.This could include blocking vehicle access completely, restricting vehicle turning movements to"right-in,right-out",or using signage to partially restrict access to one direction. 18a Fanno Creek Trail Enhanced Crossing This plan recommends installing a Pedestrian Hybrid Signal for the Fanno Crossing Opportunity Creek Trail crossing just north of the bridge.See TSP Project IDs:S-18, S-19,AT-15. 18b Fanno Creek Bridge replacement Reconstruct Fanno Creek Bridge to the typical cross section identified in Bridge to accommodate all this plan. RTP ID:12003.See TSP Project IDs:S-18,S-19,AT-15. modes 19 Omara St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 20 Wall St Enhanced Crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity.An enhanced crossing facility would use Opportunity high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and appropriate signage. Potential improvements could include pedestrian refuge islands, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting. 21 Between Regina Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a Ln and Fanno opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility Creek Dr with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 22 McDonald St Protected Intersection, Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected Traffic Signal intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable Improvements. movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people Study feasibility of driving. Include traffic signal timing improvements to improve traffic flow on roundabout. Hall Boulevard between McDonald St and Bonita Rd.Study feasibility of roundabout during engineering and design phase.See TSP Projects IDs S-19,S-20. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ID Location Category Recommendation 23 Greenswald Ln Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. Include an access restriction and/or intersection a rectangular rapid reconfiguration for is proposed at Greensward Ln to reduce conflicts for flashing beacon(RRFB). turning vehicles and improve traffic flow on Hall Boulevard.This could include blocking vehicle access completely,restricting vehicle turning movements to"right-in,right-out",or using signage to partially restrict access to one direction. 24 Bonita Rd Protected Intersection, Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected Traffic Signal intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable Improvements. movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people Study feasibility of driving. Include traffic signal timing improvements to improve traffic flow on roundabout. Hall Boulevard between McDonald St and Bonita Rd. 25 South of Pinebrook Right-of-Way This area is too narrow for the typical cross section to fit.Special design St Constraints considerations will be needed to accommodate all modes. 26 Murdock St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 27 Sattler St Protected Intersection Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people driving. 28 Ashford St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 29 South of Ashford Right-of-Way This area is too narrow for the typical cross section to fit.Special design St Constraints considerations will be needed to accommodate all modes. 30 Avon St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potvential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 31 Durham Rd Protected Intersection Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people driving. Include traffic signal timing improvements to improve traffic flow on Hall Boulevard between McDonald St and Bonita Rd. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 51 r. .. . } • \ v i',wilt ..;r/. i: w .4 r0. y. A + 4• - - ' • .- -. allf sii ...:5 ,.. • • --. .. 7 1 +Ori• iQ .;•r . �. f 44110.dr•. .. 0.-•v yr -! 10 - f 0 ••- . —••- • ' -" ' Pr 4 ' ." . • J'J •�-'•-,.- p �i 'n.. —•'. rte • -' " - , �' iY:i r a' W ...• • }1 S.rY • 11 a .` �Y. a, • 1 r•' �' • • 7 i. ,.'i.fs ��.^ • ;' `� •'_t1�}iy'r•••'.�•1.y�?['y;=`_+•.. ;�7n:.fir:'.: • •"' ' ' s '_- `� - _ 7 ..'�,, , • k -'••••-PirPOP F0.741 1 . Rift 1�-. • •' ••I' 1 >"' 4. .1 -�{:IIS•1 .' '1yr' 9^ ' 6. DISCUSSION Undertaking a project of this magnitude and North segment. The first is at Steve St, which doesn't complexity presents many challenges and connect to Hall Boulevard. A new park is planned in a uncertainties, especially given the numerous potential parcel adjacent to Steve St, but the plans don't include funding scenarios and evolving circumstances. In a connection to Hall Boulevard. The project team still this section,we discuss the various segments of the recommends a mid-block crossing at this location Hall Boulevard project in greater detail to help the despite this fact, because the next available crossings City make informed decisions as funding sources are either Spruce Street or Pfaffle Street, nearly a materialize and opportunities emerge. quarter mile apart. The second mid-block crossing is proposed at the first bus stop north of Highway 99. This crossing is already marked, has signage, North Segment (Locust Street to and employs a pedestrian refuge island. However, it Highway 99) currently does not offer facilities for people biking that There are several key implementation notes to would be considered sufficient for riders of all ages consider during future phases of work in the North and abilities. Special design considerations will need segment. First,while each of the intersections along to be taken at this location to accommodate all modes. Hall Boulevard should feature safe bicycle and pedestrian crossings,the design of the protected In terms of existing right-of-way,the North segment is the most constrained. The proposed cross section Locust Street intersection will be especially critical [ due to the number of school trips it facilitates (or design is narrower than the other segments but will could facilitate) between Metzger Elementary still likely deviate from the typical cross section in and neighborhoods to the north and east of the certain areas. The difference between the proposed intersection. vision for the North segment and the available right- of-way is especially pronounced between Oak Street Additionally,the City was awarded $1M in ODOT Safe and Spruce Street. Future phases of work should Routes to School (SRTS)funding to add a sidewalk study the option for no center left turn lane at Spruce on the north side of Locust St between Hall Blvd and Street as a way to save space. 92nd Ave. This project should be completed with an understanding that this sidewalk will connect to a In terms of prioritizing implementation,the North future protected intersection at Hall. Similarly, ODOT segment is adjacent to residential areas with the was awarded a federal earmark of$4M for improved greatest transportation equity needs along the pedestrian crossings and sidewalk infill on Spruce corridor. The segment also has the most substandard Street. This work should be coordinated to fulfill the infrastructure and therefore has the greatest potential future vision of Hall Boulevard along this segment. to leverage State of Good repair funding toward Lastly, ODOT will be rebuilding the Highway 217 achieving the Hall Boulevard vision. Additionally,the North segment has other incoming projects, such as Bridge. The future bridge will include sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides. The design of the North sidewalks on Locust St Prioritizing the Hall Boulevard segment should account for this and attempt to add improvements between Spruce and Locust would help separation between the bike lane and the travel lane to complement these projects and together would to the extent possible, either as a painted buffer or have a greater impact on the quality of the bicycle and pedestrian network than if say,the section between using flexible delineators. Pfaffle St and Hwy 99 were prioritized, because the There are two mid-block crossings proposed for the three projects would not connect. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 53 Central Segment (A) (Highway 99 to challenges in acquiring more due to the position of Commercial Street) existing buildings relative to the property lines. At the start of the project,the Central segment was Finally,this segment of Hall Boulevard is adjacent considered one segment due to the difference in to some of its highest equity need areas, and so land uses from the northern and southern extents additional attention to the transportation needs and of the corridor. However, during the alternatives impacts of the work on the surrounding community development phase, it became clear that the Central should be factored into the implementation of the segment should be divided into two subsegments proposed improvements in this area. to include the unique design found within Central segment(B). Central Segment (B) (Commercial Street The most critical intersection of the segment is to Omara Street) at Highway 99. The project team recommends a The Central segment(B) has the most unique protected intersection design and removal of the proposed cross section among the four segments. eastbound to southbound slip lane among other This segment accounts for the future Southwest improvements. The scale of the work needed to make Corridor light rail station and has the highest the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Highway 99 is concentration of destinations along the corridor: large and would require significant coordination with downtown,the Fanno Creek Trail, and the Tigard ODOT even after the jurisdictional transfer, and would Library. These are the factors that prompted the likely be completed as a standalone effort separate inclusion of the west side shared use path. from the implementation of the Hall Boulevard corridor work. Still,this is the most important intersection in The implementation of this segment will impact the use the City of Tigard from a safety perspective, so any of these facilities.The northern terminus at Commercial changes to the intersection that could be completed Street is intended to be a gateway into downtown with funding for this project should be attempted. as well as facilitate people traveling between transit stations, and so its design should incorporate Between Highway 99 and Hunziker Street,there wayfinding signage and seating. The crossing on are no marked crossings, which prompted the the north leg should be enhanced to facilitate travel recommendation for a crossing at Garden Place. After between downtown,the light rail, and north bound gathering public input however,this recommendation cyclists looking to transition back to the east side. was moved to Knoll Street. The distance between Highway 99 and Scoffins Street is roughly 1,500 feet, Another key implementation consideration is the enough distance that another marked crossing could railroad crossing. The crossing should include be considered. pedestrian and bicycle signals and/or gate treatments. These elements should be emphasized on the west The proposed cross section for Central segment(A) side with the shared use path. The design of the west is similar to that of the North segment, but calls for a side pedestrian and bicycle facilities will need to bend wider footprint. This wider footprint manifests in larger away from Hall Boulevard and intersect the railroad sidewalks (10' instead of 8')to accommodate the perpendicularly. This will require additional right-of- increased pedestrian traffic in and around downtown way from the railroad authority. The east side however, Tigard. While it has more right-of-way than the north won't require as intensive of a treatment as it will segment, Central segment(A) has less than Central only have an on-street northbound bike lane and 6' B and the South segments, and would face greater sidewalk. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION Next,the Fanno Creek Bridge will need to be assessment of these two locations suggested that completely replaced to accommodate the proposed roundabouts would be difficult to implement without cross section for Central segment(A). Within the significant right-of-way acquisition and earthwork. segment,the available right-of-way is least flexible However, additional study would help the City between the Fanno Creek Bridge and Omara Street. understand if the extra effort could improve/smooth However, a southbound center left turn lane won't traffic flow(rather than reduce congestion) significantly be necessary at Omara Street, so a two-lane cross reduce congestion. The City will need to acquire section could be implemented to save space. right-of-way immediately south of Bonita Road, or else it will be forced to implement a design that deviates Recently, ODOT submitted a federal earmark($4M) significantly from the proposed cross section. for a pedestrian crossing at Omara Street. If granted, the timing of this work should be coordinated with the ODOT included Ashford Street in the same federal rebuilding of the roadway at this location, because this earmark as Omara Street. Should this funding become crossing will function as the southern terminus of the available,the Ashford Street crossing should be shared-use path. At this end,the path should function implemented in a way that fulfills the vision for the as a gateway to the library and help facilitate travel to South segment.At this location there is also a right-of- and from the Fanno Creek Trail, so wayfinding signage way pinchpoint just south of Ashford Street. and seating in this area may be especially important. Additionally,this crossing would be where people Durham Road, like Locust Street, is one of the most biking northbound would have the option to either important intersections along the whole corridor for continue northbound on and on-street bike lane or students, given its proximity to Tigard High School. transition to the shared-use path, so an RRFB or other Given the way the school is oriented relative to the user activated crossing is recommended. Both the rest of the network, Hall Boulevard would be the most Commercial Street and Omara Street crossings should direct north south connection for students walking include bike crossing markings. and biking to school. Improvements in Central B will be easier than those in Finally,the City should consider implementing Central A to complete in the near term because of the traffic calming infrastructure along SW 85th Ave to uncertainty around the Southwest Corridor light rail facilitate the connection between Hall Boulevard and and the subsequent realignment of Hunziker St and Cook Park. Scoffins St. Additionally, coordinating the proposed In terms of prioritizing implementation,the south protected intersection at Hall Boulevard and Hwy 99 segment's largest challenge will be the section with ODOT itself would likely be a larger task than between Bonita Rd and McDonald St. The section implementing the whole vision for segment Central B. between Bonita Rd and Durham could be a good candidate for interim bike infrastructure like separated South Segment (Omara Street to bike lanes with delineators, and would enhance the Durham Road) connection between bike facilities on Durham Rd and Sattler St. There are also multiple locations in which Hall Boulevard's most heavily traveled section is crossing improvements would support transit stops between Bonita Road and McDonald Street. Given and connections to neighborhood paths. Focusing that Hall Boulevard, a north-south roadway,facilitates on improvements in this section first would have the so much east-west travel,the project team proposes benefits of connecting more residential areas directly studying the potential for roundabouts during the to Tigard High School and Cook Park. design phase at these two locations. A preliminary HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 55 IMPLEMENTATION Cost Estimate by multiple sources and over varying timeframes. Prioritization of the improvements will be necessary if After the second round of public engagement, in the funding and timing realities force the vision to be which community members were asked to provide implemented incrementally. Prioritization should be feedback on the proposed concepts,the project based on a number of factors, including geography, team began estimating the costs of the final need,timing, phasing, benefits and cost. recommendations in each segment. These estimates are considered "planning level" and are the project ► Need: Projects could be prioritized by team's current estimate for the price tag associated with implementing the vision using current material infrastructure needs and equity considerations and construction costs. of an area relative to the rest of the corridor. The greatest difference between State of Good The construction cost to rebuild Hall Boulevard Repair costs and the costs associated with as proposed in this plan is estimated to be the Hall Boulevard vision exists in the North approximately$61.1M, or roughly double that of segment. The highest scoring equity areas the cost to bring the roadway up to a State of are in the North Segment and the Central A Good Repair. This does not include the soft costs segment. of engineering or design work, nor does it include the costs of moving utilities and acquiring right- ► Timing/proximity: Some improvements may of-way. These additional costs can vary but our be more suitable than others to combine initial estimates place the total cost including these or coincide with other capital improvement expenses at over$100M. projects, land development, or funding opportunities that make their implementation It is worth noting that these improvements are investments with the potential for long-term cost easier and enhance the overall effect. This benefits, not only in terms of safety but also in will be necessary in comparing city identified attracting private sector development. Metro's Betterments vs. State of Good Repair report on active transportation return on investment improvements. quantifies some of these economic advantages, ► Geography:this document outlines 4 key study emphasizing the opportunity costs of delaying these areas which could serve as logical groupings crucial enhancements.' for a larger improvement project, even if other parts of the corridor can't be implemented until Prioritization later. Given the scale and complexity of the proposed ► Benefits: Some improvement projects improvements, it is likely the project will be funded represent"low-hanging fruit" in that the cost to implement them is small relative to the benefits 1 Active Transportation Return on Investment Study that they provide. Examples of these could be Metro(2022). https://www.oregonmetro.gov/active- transportation-return-investment-study enhanced crossings near key destinations like • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION schools and parks. starting with another non-connecting section like Pfaffle St to Hwy 99. ► Cost: On a per mile basis,the Central segment (B)would cost the most to implement given the ► Prioritizing improvements in Central B may complexity of the cross section and the scale be more feasible in the near term due to the of constraints faced in that segment; however, uncertainties surrounding the Southwest at just over$6M, it would be less expensive Corridor light rail and the subsequent to construct than the South segment,which realignment of Hunziker St and Scoffins would cost over twice as much. The South St. Coordinating the proposed protected segment is the next most expensive segment intersection at Hall Boulevard and Hwy 99 with on a per mile basis due to its wider footprint. ODOT will likely be a larger task, making the The segment of greatest overlap between completion of Central A improvements more State of Good Repair costs and the costs challenging than those in Central B, despite associated with the Hall Boulevard vision Central B having a slightly higher cost per mile. (in other words,the segment with the most ► The main implementation challenge for the opportunity to align State of Good Repair South segment lies in the stretch between funding with the vision) exists in the North Bonita Rd and McDonald St. Focusing efforts segment,where the existing infrastructure is on the segment from Bonita Rd to Durham Rd least sufficient. with interim bike infrastructure and crossing ► Phasing: some improvements are more suitable improvements would better connect existing than others to be phased in over time, starting bike facilities and support transit stops, with semi-permanent infrastructure. For benefiting residential areas and enhancing example, rather than a raised curb protected access to Tigard High School and Cook Park. bike lane,the City could consider buffer striping and delineators in strategic locations. Project Prioritization by Segment: ► Prioritizing the implementation of Hall Boulevard improvements in the North segment between Spruce St and Locust St may be beneficial. Prioritizing this section would complement incoming projects such as the sidewalks on Locust St and Spruce St, which would enhance the bicycle and pedestrian network's overall quality more effectively than HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 57 t\,... .=--y. -,..74/1• ',T..", .,...._,,.... ; --..• ,...,_ -:.---,... ...."•”". '4:-,- 4.-. , - • .... ..----, ---• •.- • :- , +"...- 7;71.1.,- :"--. "--. -•• ••7',..4ifii -- 6.Sa. .- ''' • - • •',1-`,7'1 --. .---f,?.. • -- ' .- 4.1.••• , 4.• `.-k-' -''' • •-t-. ...1'.• ',', ... ,-: , - ' _...; • • • -,. ' , -5•....- .6-- +1g1;" -- • .:.±.,-.,--., .••• ;4•7.•C--t•tt. •--AL, -- • . 3 .._ • 'f' * ••••4 •.:.- -re •-• l••I - .- •, _ •-.-:- • `. ..,,-.-. ` „ . ''''---.);bie "-•.r 4-`..-•- • , r;q -- °L,4v,-.•: -:-•• _.,.... • . t•• - .. -. _ ._. -„.-.... -.4....-q":-._ -,,_ ,...2-: -.L. • - .4,,,-,.•-. , ..-"y_..- _ •,; • -r-•• .:;_1.1:.• I. • -..' - - -• , .. ._,.. . „_ ., . • : • . .J... -,-.. .-;-ISCA-4-‘.-. '-' -r.i:-.-.`. ''''..----...-74D-A- 1:.;. •;',1,114.1,14,....ar'.'Qra'''..., , ---'" ." •,:-.Whio . • %•!'.14.' ``fft; - .A.- -','"-•'. &-`‘'-.- ---.---,-et- ,.:,„.. .-, . - -. -. ,.i - _ . ___,. __-_t-_-4,..„ -N.,..,...•,.„ - _.„... .._ , ,..._,. , .. .. . . . ..i .... --- __ ,.. AV , t-- -k. • '- '.-- '"•-'-..-- :---'--:': - ••' ?.-f-:'--- -.- L.-.\ii.a.d.r 1„•L:- ',, .. w•---- ',-=-- "- '••-t-' •:-- !1•'-` 1;•-•'''' '-= ...., ..ki- ' ^"2'-'0. :- . ••‘'-.:;., -,--•',7-- - -- - - 1.- '..--.--"k--' =-4 .j.- . ' .•-•=-----•-_. . IT---r., • - ._ -- W.--- - ----r-.• -= .-.-_---:"..:',7-':t --In- -, 'IC '• 46. 41111. . . '` '--- ' . • _ . „ ...• . ,,,‘#.74._,L•_...• -,-.a.-• „;_::..., .._ ',•_, . _. , •-.g'r...,, -„,...4-•'--, - 1111hk 4 -4a -..'".p...ON. - - ,---jp-•-• ..:-•;! • , v - - ...A7 .1".•: - ...• ... et. ir,.t..- . . 1111 . -- -`-- --..--._____- •-• - N.- -'• 4S• •-'`' - , •41510 At4-:..'•:' L-`•.4 - "-„ -4:1. .".:•:.147-.Si* t .-44• "454 •• '- 4111k"S5' *'..' .'2..'''' ' 'e- .., .. 1- ,...,•It , - .i/..„- .....k - ...".•-.... ..."14.7.4.. _ ..... 5 ... _,.. SP,. -17•'. .--- . 2 •••-- -':-.11i-... . 1„N'114 '. .,,.... -..r. -•-• Ti,%. ...• .,r_•- i 1 • ..,.:., _ -.....- - - -4,-,.--•-•--4-• ,.-...",-4-• ' . -4.-- ,,,,.•-v.,••, . .ir -.•_ ,. •-•.,---t-,- '.,...-;i!-.,---,1-,,_1-_ Jr4 - •.•f'-•... -iL.:4 • . /ft . „ 1 ... 4 •:- It' ' .- — '' • ip*k- --. 1111116k '' ''''''.44!--7........ •" '.. ',..1.% --LC<-Pr ..... ..- . t-AP. . ,-,.. . - •7! - •. .5_,.;-:..0_,- ..,. -,. - .--.. ______.„.., . Al - f -'- ••••-Ut- .-r". •-_.:- - -t-'• :r•,i.• .....-•e• r'..., r: -'--=- - t I - l',`-N--'t • .•:-Ct.- -;i:--„„-‘,__,,,,,_•.;-='.41f.4-•.w.ig-•'... '':44"••2..V --- -.4..,;'...4.. .4."-1-•,. .• -.... -4. vIk•-.:'3.: - i - - 16k::•.-Le.-'41A:--kS4S.52-q.'Ir.', 42f2A-; ----r.• : :::. •. t'- -'...:;t..t...... :-.' -N I. . i. 4 ' Y '',.' -,''A''t .a,..;Z.44•71•7..... 4!"*.!':' :24441''f. --'-S'-'1-•'4-• 4.'4.''- -..' )' , ..,, _,..67. -_,.4:.__ :1,...VEA. ,. • a"-..*-..,-.._ *.I.:T."'}.:•. - -......-- ''',-..- .:1/4N.-,...-e.: -A:F.-..l.......‘"`„tits&-4.7-......_•::14.A.... . 4..-7- _.2;;.-.....,,',L... - -- E:a - -.._..._- ._,_00.1....,,,,,,,'"L..:..--k .....,,,i , .r...,....,A.. - .._ - .....ve7c. ,22. , .., mr,-.4tio-t.••h-, .. - - - -- --••-••.....- .... . '. - . a. - • -‘ .r--.. .•21 ._.-----, '- .-4'5#-- --- '- ' --. . 4 _ .... . .._.__ -_ .1 . - . . . . , - -,... . . . . - _ ... . •• , - i , . . -- - 4 •--!--.7'•-,s7 • - -, .,_,-, 7.,...i•-• ,• ..•)--1.s./7-1..-'77' q.,...-"••1-:41.4CH_.r3„*:--::-...;'•*- - .. L..: • 4 •••••,.- • . , - - r-- . ---- - - • L • •' --5. • ‘ is.- _I..- - N-_-....-:. 4-....--. •- .- .. _. . -.- T..,_ 5 .-..- ,. . ,__.. - ' ---N, -- -' -'‘-'''---''' • • "lit- ,- -- "-:'" - •git::F.-1.—rg - - -' " -y;,4P-4•-ildr.-„,v2,---'-',..,j.'--1:::,--N.:-..p•-__*;', ..v.A4.-., . ..,. . ..., 1,7---.- , -.a:4,p,- . .--- ,..... ,-,..-, . - ....-t .„. , . ,........4. ._ .„,..w..4, . ..._ . _ ..., , -rt4-.--iii-:-:-- -: .. i4,-.1'7` 'rr•V 1P- ..-- • '- - •_ .,...• . ."."-7, ;4--„,„e•-x-,,k,a,A,„$..__K:oi....4- - ,. -.,:a„---25144.-."--.-...,--: r-...-.•-• — • ,k ...:• • -.•-,r4,j1/2.....„-lt:IFI',„ - _ 711r4J'-'4"-liit,N....'-- -!-"-,-, atr. - - '.-'7.- --.'i.rsl..'.tmk-7-4--rFi,r,--p,-.,-;-rs --:::,---,-.,:-_ ? •-•..., -F,..;:,—..,-ig• 1 - , .„:-...7._......,...„,„7„,e,..„. ,;,...,:„...,ssi,....: _. ;I.,„........,.....„,...., -...- .'-iki4•47-(1.1.:t.iZ:r'ir'4---:.'-',C-Lek?;;ZI,i4iaiC41'....1-.'. '1"f5D..-'.....---4P' -414.12-51 ''' - .- . '-- '4',.,\ . -'.‘ :.'. .44.0.7.-*7-',.e•e4:-IL.S....-11';;•:i,'.-!;',....M.- -41/4:".. '.4...' .?._7...-,‘_.,re..i.k.;:«-e471f..f. _•_':fr;41..."-..•10,7 4...;_- ;A...4"C„,E, r'''''.... .,1'. %., ---- _ - •- - 40_. ,. _4 -:71.• -,;.4, _ •-',0,-;:... .,_:,..4,7t.... e-„, . 4 ;it-o.:•*..-I.,..?..,---'7-...---A-07.-:f.,.;v_.:--,i-r;f:417,49, -,-,-,:-,-;:-... 'T iri,<:-.-",. ...r,.., ' - - 4-'4. ' -k; '• -'44.`,..._--- ,--- - •----`k-•-•..• - -F., . -t",-.11•14.---z---)-..-it,?.......;t1••:,---m-.)..v..-,c-,:-.A,A.•=e3gig._ „......_ --.:%ke,...4, ,•—• • . :-....,.4.,:,..a. . ...-. _,---, - •- ' ..„-. ..,...••:•;„. ...---L-•- -4`•••••• • -=C .. N.,. •••• -.fflr....- • -11.474...i- . .7-S•e-• 1-"i4 '-',Lt.• '- N..-.',...‘71,‘;'6.!..... _.,-,.„,_-7-77,40_'__•:!•' • - ''"3-'1* 'i ' .-N.. ' -4V-11,... •11-,As.ISA.?-1!%rn- -14.' - w.• -ASTeow t_ , --.-m ,., ct 4`,. ,..4rieM.' . f.t.e..;:,'. •' --,' 4.--- , •-rrk-i. ....`:-,1/2•-„- . - , - ... • . , ." -. ,-,,,,6,H•,-- .4!... • , -'----.-.4,_.,.i-..',,,.::.i,,,,,er,..it- ., ...,,le,.,a_..,,-,,,:,-/t,,,,,-3.•,..0 ,...., -•• - - - -- .F....,- - 1. APPENDIX MEMORANDUM d I To: Dave Roth,Joe Wisniewski P.E.,City of Tigard From: Derek Abe, Phil Longenecker Alta Planning+Design Date: 8/01/2022 Re: Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project Task 2.2—Existing Conditions Memo Existing Conditions Memorandum This memo addresses the existing conditions,opportunities, and constraints to multimodal connections near and along Hall Boulevard.This memo will summarize City policies,consider current and future access along the corridor, and review similar assessments conducted for Hall Boulevard. Lastly,this memo will highlight key features of the corridor,summarize the transportation context of the area and provide a foundation for the visioning project.The various sections in this memo are listed below: 1. Plan Review 2. Introduction to Project Area a. Project Extent b. Equity and Demographics c. Existing and Planned Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks d. Transit Context e. Vehicular and Truck Traffic 3. Collisions and Safety 4. Key Development Areas 5. Right of Way 6. Project Opportunities and Constraints Plan Review City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (2022) The 2040 Transportation System Plan (TSP)was initiated in 2020 and responds to a new strategic vision for Tigard's future,which emphasizes developing a multi-modal transportation system that is walkable, healthy, sustainable, and accessible for everyone.This TSP serves as an important long-range planning tool for Tigard to ensure its transportation system can meet community needs, realize the City's strategic vision, and conform to state and regional policies. The TSP discusses Hall Boulevard in the following ways: • Hall Boulevard will be a key north-south route between neighborhoods within Tigard, providing a critical function for accessing Downtown,the Tigard Transit Center,the Tigard Triangle, numerous civic uses, Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 59 MEMORANDUM alta including the library. With a potential for jurisdictional transfer of this road,the city has an interest in enhancing this corridor with improved sidewalks and bikeways between SW Omara Street and Pacific Highway. • The need to update the characterization of Hall Boulevard to reflect the jurisdictional transfer from ODOT to the City of Tigard. • Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard are the primary access routes to the downtown area. • The need to reexamine the alignment of Scoffins St/Hunziker St at Hall Boulevard. • The percentage of youth under age 18 is fairly evenly distributed across the City, but the senior population is heavily concentrated in the southeast neighborhoods between Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard. • Improving pedestrian and bicycle crossing opportunities at the intersection of Commercial Street and Hall Boulevard. City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020—2025 In 2019,the City embarked on a journey to refresh Tigard's Strategic Plan, last updated in 2015.The purpose of the strategic plan is to set a focus for how the city's vision and direction will be achieved.The strategic plan helps an organization allocate resources, set priorities, and states what it will say yes to.The plan outlines a vision,which intends to highlight where we want to go as a city and what we want to be.The new vision emphasizes equity,walkability, health, and accessibility. The second strategic priority is to create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible pedestrian network.The objectives and actions relating to this priority that are relevant to the Hall Boulevard project are listed below: • Create a well-connected pedestrian network that links all Tigard residents and businesses. • Bring parks and trailheads within a 10-minute walk of every Tigard resident. • Design the trail system to serve both recreational and active transportation purposes. • Invest in infrastructure that increases public safety such as trail lighting. • Ensure inclusive and accessible design is included in the design guidelines and implemented through the ADA Transition Plan, Parks Master Plan, and Pedestrian Network Plan. Tigard Complete Streets Policy Implementation Plan (2019) At its heart,the Strategic Plan sets forth a vision for Tigard to build its unique identity as the most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest.Achieving this outcome requires a practical, policy-driven "Complete Streets" approach that reconsiders how Tigard plans and invests in its transportation system.The Complete Streets policy is therefore critical to the visioning of Hall Boulevard. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard 60 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM dl .4 Below are the guiding principles of the Complete Streets policy: 2.1 Serve All Users 2.2 Provide Interconnected Networks 2.3 Use Best Practices and Innovative, Context-Sensitive Design 2.4 Support Land Use Planning Goals 2.5 Internal and Jurisdictional Coordination 2.6 Measure Performance City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan (2019) The City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP) documents the findings from a citywide transportation safety analysis that examined crashes involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers.The TSAP describes crash trends and patterns, prioritizes locations for safety improvements, and presents potential safety treatments for locations with the most potential to reduce fatal and severe injury crashes in the City,some of which involve Hall Boulevard.The TSAP identifies potential safety improvements and creates an avenue for the city to pursue ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety(ARTS)and other grant funding to enhance transportation safety. The following intersections were ranked as some of the highest priority intersections in Tigard given their history of crashes and severity: • Highway 99 and Hall Boulevard (Ranked#1) • Hall Boulevard and Durham Rd (Ranked#14) Murraysmith Hall Boulevard Condition Assessment(2020) The purpose of the Murraysmith report was to provide an assessment of the existing condition of assets within the public right-of-way along SW Hall Boulevard,from SW Durham Road to the City of Tigard (City) limits just north of SW Locust Street.This condition assessment addresses the immediate needs and costs to bring SW Hall Boulevard to a "State of Good Repair",with the understanding that the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the City will work towards reaching a jurisdictional transfer of SW Hall Boulevard within the City limits. The report states that deferred maintenance and rapidly evolving construction standards have left much of the corridor needing significant work to bring SW Hall Boulevard to a State of Good Repair.The percentage of assets that need to be brought to a State of Good Repair,that can be quantified, are as follows: 81 percent roadway pavement,98 percent curb ramps,65 percent storm drainage facilities, and the Ash Creek Bridge.To address corridor wide deficiencies and bring Hall Boulevard to a State of Good Repair, it will cost approximately$28.4 million if constructed in 2020. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 61 MEMORANDUM The assessment contains detailed information for Hall Boulevard on the following,all of which serve as an important foundation for the Hall Boulevard visioning project: • Functional Classification and Traffic Volume • Cross Sectional Elements • Future Projects • Pavement Condition • Curb and Sidewalk • Curb Ramps • Stormwater Facilities • Traffic Signals and Flashing Beacons • Illumination • Permanent Signage • Bridges • Right-of-Way • Railroad Crossing Washington Square Regional Center Redevelopment Plan (2021) The Washington Square Regional Center(WSRC) is located at the northern edge of Tigard,the southeastern edge of Beaverton,and the eastern edge of unincorporated Washington County. Recognizing the WSRC's potential for transformative, equitable,and sustainable growth,the City of Tigard led a 2020-2021 project to update existing policies and the original land use and transportation vision.Some recommendations that resulted from this effort relate directly to Hall Boulevard.This project sought to better align future WSRC development with current community needs and aspirations,emerging market trends, and Tigard's goal to be a walkable, healthy, and inclusive community. Key recommendations from the Washington Square Regional Center Redevelopment Plan include: • Explore interest in Oregon "Main Street" designation for Hall Boulevard between Oak and Locust. • Enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and access along Hall Boulevard,through measures such as enhanced mid-block crossings at key locations. • Study the feasibility of a pedestrian and bicycle connection between Hall Boulevard and the future Metzger/Ash Creek park. Fehr& Peers Mobility Solutions Analysis Methodology(Southwest Corridor) (2020) As part of the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project, significant planning and analysis were conducted on behalf of TriMet and Metro.The Fehr& Peers Mobility Solutions Analysis and Methodology report outlines their demographic and psychographic analyses on accessing proposed light rail stations, one of which was located on Hall Boulevard. Each proposed transit station along the SWC had a different combination of mobility elements Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard 62 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM alto, that suit the unique geographic, land use, and demographic characteristics around the station.The authors then made recommendations on what new mobility elements will best suit each station based on their findings. The report found that among households within 1 mile of the proposed Hall Boulevard Station (which would be located on Hall Boulevard between Scoffins St and Burnham St)there exists a larger population of low-income families and low-income seniors. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan (2007) The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan acts as the City's"land use constitution." It is the document that provides the broad policy basis for Tigard's land use planning program and ultimately guides all actions relating to the use of land in the City.The Plan also signals that the City's land use planning efforts will implement state and regional requirements, including Oregon's land use planning goals and related laws,state administrative rules, and applicable Metro plans and requirements. Key findings of the comprehensive plan relating to the transportation system are listed below: • Improving connectivity will maximize the investment in the existing transportation system. • Land use patterns that shorten home-to-work trips,support transit,and make walk/bike trips more viable can help reduce congestion. • High comfort and low stress bicycle and pedestrian facilities are vital to developing at fully functioning network that accommodates people of all ages and abilities plans and requirements. Introduction to the Hall Boulevard Visioning Project Area The Hall Boulevard corridor is an important multimodal north-south route in the city that will play a critical role in connecting downtown with residential neighborhoods and future developments in the Tigard Triangle.The roadway is classified as an arterial street in the City's TSP.The roadway also intersects with key pieces of Tigard's multiuse path and trail network, such as the Fanno Creek Trail and Cook Park. In addition to serving many walking and biking trips, Hall Boulevard is an important transit corridor and freight corridor. Multiple schools are in close proximity to the roadway,such as Tigard High School and Twality Middle School,which makes Hall Boulevard important in serving school-related trips. The visioning project extent,which extends from Locust St to Durham Rd, contains multiple intersections that play a prominent role in the transportation system, including Locust St, Hwy 99, Hunziker Rd/Scoffins St, McDonald St, Bonita Rd, and Durham Rd (Map 1).While each segment of Hall Boulevard has its own opportunities and constraints,the overall roadway can be conceptualized into three segments with somewhat similar land use and transportation contexts: North (Locust St to Hwy 99), Central (c, and South (Fanno Creek Trail to Durham Road). Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 63 Map 1 WASHING -- +.i ir'r_�-' a Y rCrV$0 MI, LOCUST�ST !',--'I 1 II II Il I W[Ey ri RO. 4N.p I r 1{1 II I+ I' 1 lr,4� �g rs > Aii,,,m,. .,..,,_ ,_NIA 4 LEAEST.K, ki x=lr a II II , �� rd4ENCLEW❑�G ❑ \., sJ •`Y,.„L. CVVD` CVD;;'---- pox 3ft. VPiNE ST •- F CHay.a FLA L?=1W pY _ LJ__JSPRUCE.ST �y � ,�i _. Em s ■ .. n !ill y7A(r m_dRFRPFLE ST• • TIGARD� %I I Y``. `- % d a a1 a f .--. DFRxSEN ' ::, ,tl 2 ' '5`'4„.” -BRYLOR ST bd. �1 Nip a NATURE PARK d� "' y. "'CELL.... ooaRDaaRx CPO ''i 74 . rake vrHST �. 'I �. �WALNUT�s7 — _� f.Ioxt1LL N �-n� 7 `_l If �4- a 4 N f �ERRD sr�-; w'; •ir' �� r 4-✓• "� ,� ]'fli: • 1 Li i]1 • �r ~ pQQ ,,,�� 1D i c-1 V.7 vr" '�"P� L. NrsoL , RD. ►• `� �� Lp , 4.DELLCTrh _ 'F ? Pt PARK y p� �. `� �a:P,aRK•ST: . c '' q ere FANN4 1:1 s VARNS ST �" o s 6,.L a,'y_ CREEK AAF ,� FA/RNAVEN ❑�.� , ,yp !.` `S �. OMARA'STIL J FAIRHAYENr �!�. �,; J ANDD,lkl r tii ,r EMEWOOD STS" Q ,r'1 f OARDEN ,r� ;H�LVl W,S7� 4p AA _ TECH C5NTER OR15 PAt,e01_ i1�!I!I�11 I R 4+pi EST - -- - MCDONALD ST • 1 . III OUNTANy It, �DNZrI :. ,.r yyu ir-.L '?..N!''';,-.,,- ANNU ¢- f•i: q� •a� *� GREENSWARDyi - C- �7. -4'�i�� g., L•1 ��als ii•A ZST n - "I'RLiRY,LHr•A. S rn r i ?ONITA Rh EAST e�I'C'CPO ?- � � 6 � PINT oR'K�� ICV 4M -ER 7 MURDDCK•ST .�.7, �.� i i x giRErU :•1. I ° LADY,fg4P ` ,_ w o sT ,.,. - _ `�`/ 11-41.. rn RIGH OR �, atk 1FI000VIEW •BATTLER ST Affee ii w� 'S •�' f KABLE ST �;SSSE DR .DR yyKEH70N DR +■ , 'u� I �� LAY• C :ELLFLOWER ST+; 4 ■ z 1 r' .. , I;.., ❑ Jr iiii,,,,,,DDR • Ail ST 1 . Rp�n ..,,t,ERFf µidly. 1 yHAMLEY .'a� o�'ws! \ CEN„1.0,OP� !de ?ORD BOND Si I e.,(1..0.7'..`'.:: (Ar ' I [_1_}£ D +RD O 0 0.45 L.S MILEi U PROJECT EXTENT Neighborhood Organization Hall Boulevard CPC 4B BULL MTN 6 School CITY OF TIGARD CPO 4M METZGER School Campus HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY Park if::: City of Tigard alta 64 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX MEMORANDUM ai kid Equity and Demographic Analysis One factor that makes Hall Boulevard a significant corridor in the City of Tigard is that it connects a diverse range of people. In the census tracts that comprise the Central section of Hall Boulevard near downtown and the Tigard Triangle,there are higher populations of lower income households relative to the surrounding neighborhoods (Map 2).These neighborhoods are also where there are higher numbers of households who lack access to a motor vehicle,and therefore may be dependent on other modes of transportation (Map 3).The Transportation System Plan calls attention to this geography as well, noting that while"the percentage of youth under age 18 is fairly evenly distributed across the City,the senior population is heavily concentrated in the southeast neighborhoods between Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard."Alta's in-house equity analysis tool, which combines a range of indicators from demographic data to tree canopy coverage to economic mobility, returns a result that is spatially consistent with these findings(Map 4). Incorporating equity within the Hall Boulevard visioning project will likely mean specific and intentional outreach to these Equity Priority communities, providing a range of transportation options, and investing in infrastructure that is accessible for people of all ages and abilities. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 7 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 65 Map 2 WA$HINGro ./ LncusT. • HNSpUq MTIGER��44.0.%714 F SCNtPARK .5rd;' - OAK-ST Pi GL "t j ii r I 8L NO,R u �I '!I. n PINE•ST VIT 61A.c 4 r y f,. .,,,5y 1 v74'•i--NORTH DAKOTA Sly aay o�a; ARE a '% r titiw ENgURG pa ¢J x ff TIGARI],p �+ pU 2 A - 11 ❑IRKSEN r 5 :j. s -BAYLCR ST 1- NATURE PARK a 8` I • �g a w ODARUPARK �'ayMFRC SP R77! '_�jD{ :... aRr H•s•r f.. -^I WALNUT ST t '0,..., SONN "� s �i�, a ,S.r PJB ,¢vC�e 'I�- FifRM0S0 F ERRt7 //I ty" ��%• - WAY _. atiR Ci CVlA1[ RSYiAVE BEVEIAHDRD y • fia ,Ea ,� !]UTI}\ DOG a � F? • FONNER • PK C?o PARK '4 y��1� zt , i A 1, lF, 4y -\ �'r2fMo., HAMPTON ST g, \ POTS0 DOS J 4— p DELL CT ¢ T 1r`S�F 0 \PARK 5 z 4 ,p� �7p c /. r� 7 O PAPA % C S C�,`L' CREEK PAC.? VARN$$T Q 6 a n S FAIRNAVEN `�,4;''' p r _ S7 a 'b ¢' OMAR4 ST I J .` OR� FAIRH / V 5AND8lIRG it) GARD �' EDGfw OOD ST Q ST PARK•PL FIILLVIEw S7 p• X TECH }1 CENTER DR AARG• MCDONALO ST - fir 84NlTA PAR WMd1HTAl v WEW F Lly A7yliO CRG l!Q 7 xi GREENSWARD v y o a . ABURYLN 2 g REAST'' •�UEAE MURt!°°LADYAq �GS7 WsN HDoovrm N OR SATTL ER ST 0, i j - _ e '�� x !SABLE Sr a {F$iflf DR KE NTON DR ti d LAS,e..,\.- E�� Y BELLFLOWER ST c �`E,,,�p.TiD DR ORETER AF `c Y ¢ ASHFORD ST SYIhSMERFIfLD DR GRJI 'Y,l-' p 1 HAMLE]'S,T Q‘Nr`,y ti e -1CENTU .* ifi'LBOND ST .Q e RY OP DURHAM RO oAKt - r 17FORD F I• fl/ �� 7 I oa 035 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD U.S.Census Bureau,2019 ACS 5 yr Est. Hall Boulevard INCOME m >$106,000 • Railroad MI $96,000-$106,000 15 School CITY OF TIGARD HALL BOULEVARD ET $78.000-$96,000 School Campus CORRIDOR STUDY $50,000-$78,000 Park alta <$50,000 City of Tigard • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX Map 3 wuIrzc, .1 � =LUgrTa sroUAREIR1� = MAPL ELEAF Si �zo oIIIa OAK s-r se dDENGLEWOOD °' r BOCK PARI{ n PINE a7 a �sARsoR 0�V0 DIAM'ONQi, 'SPRUCE SF p� a hpyL �- a r 4' NORTH DAKOTA$7 m M1 / P ` tr-e1L m� Q £N 4 PFAFFLE ST TIGARD Sj VP 2 •�a \ peRYLGR- i'ir I ❑IRKSCN F -1 z a y' NATURE PA RK � �.'� yw �- o y,, 3 Q Si dim\+ ••••PAR •Ca'14E C£h'r s .-_ 'i• 11 r, QA?1.44CtlfH'S7 15 ,,,, , 4_6--,. - i aCsr , S AC a z WALNUT ST .10H � - S}.pori 1/ �,P' HERMOSO t ERRCIL ST OFR e. . . ASN AVEN • Mr17 BEUELa r76 R6� q tNF a 4 DOG _ FDNNCR$Z Pa F:Y2 $ R°RG/C1ay HoN w 1411TH 6 F'Shsy� ko:t,„, ;�RRp '' HA.4PTON ST C ,,HELL CT pG ice/ ,, 7 PARK ST a R c, R��2 A.Cr-6, r- FRNND II\ II y C Z rP% c),. :.NZ R .Sf CRf!K PAF? 55" =FAIR41ApFN p m + itiARKS ST y' if OMAF:4 Si rc � FAERHAVEN� 1/ U J a '!! EDGE WOOD S7 SAN68l1FG GARDEN PARK PL HILLVIEw ST PT = ST �� 1 -... CENTER DR GAAl7nE Si ��MAIMAL O ST 14 t N !MOLINFAIAr 0,,,„ KNITA PAR' FF ! LN NNO CRE o GREEHw RRafINSzsr 0NITAe2)4 K ST PINEEFIS© 111 EBRDGST �m.. � ��r� SUTTLER ST -� } � ■ Q z KABE, •EAST g10E DRa_ 1(EN DR � r 1 LA �4p BELLFLOWER ST� G,,,FOD DRG sµyEA1= Z o 'ASHFORD ST TO a 3GMMERPIELD DR Gj�� , g 9HAMlErsT , q`� @ d 3: L4, rLv i ¢y�CEN7ilR,00-, pAKt}'E��'4rFpRDOHSa, O iDURHAM RD LN pD/, �� 0-25 OA MILES PERCENT HOUSEHOLDS U.S.Census Bureau, - Hall Boulevard WITH NO VEHICLE ACCESS 2019 ACS 5 yr Est. Railroad School CITY OF TIGARD = 6-9% HALL BOULEVARD _ 3-6% School Campus LL CORRIDOR STUDY Park 0-3% City of Tigard alta 0% HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 67 Map 4 WgSHIN r mires-, p % on, 72G LOCUST ST W i E r NI�Q A . a C MAPLELCAE Sla x x ❑ / S OAK ST m a n dDENGLEWOOD x DL 'K PARK \p, re r.PINE Si a � _aARgIyR B�VO DIoONO, ^ .-r p� �_ SPRUCE ST. Li F• 2,5M -m�d4'� S...NORTH DAKOTA ST ,. r m FryRO PFAFFLE ST ii TIGARD.? a ., ti . DIRKSEN -� = r.,, -y -: RAVLOR 1" NATURE PARK g a 3 IVii.• 4.04 p e.-.0i'•.,1 PAR- `,'Fq E. 'a` RTMDUTH ST 1 �� II l i M i WALNUT ST x a 4 :a:...• e '`:tPo'9 HERMOso r �w ' WR ENROL ST �� 6EVELAND D s ---PONNERS'� PM 1y r •'•t 'Hill i iuTT , . tp.,?, _ HAMPTON Si ¢9ELi CT. A ,� r R AF.„,„(11%, 'e'PARK•S7 a TREE, YARNS ST y. CREEK:. }. a .ice �g _CO p o PAIRHAVEN ^pJ. __ ST s. �A 4 FALRHAVENZ .. .� R SAND8IJRG GARDy+_. w.ei)W Q ST tilI 115 PARI(PL W 11 MEM HI ,5 GAAROE ST —Ti■ Grip ST 'MOUNT/VA,VIEW {_.,-.1.. .;. N ilta .y GREENSWARD o`l:BURYLN iNE25T • .o •7A'. —.1. I .(.• MONDE) K-ST PINEBRp[RC Si 4 i f R4ING ST a N I i 44R rn .,.. pITY `,_m HOODVLEWA DR SETTLER ST m 4,, •a ¢_ ! JJJ x �.0 \L- DR4 KENTON.DR ' f 9�J I i L1� Q. BELLFLOWER ST r ` ND DR�ENLEAI: R2 ;ASHFORD ST �5 TER ym HAA1! SUMMERFIELD DR G S $,� "! '' rsp E' F' 4E � ¢ CENTLRSOPF �I. -! ! I OAK wS � rFOio (ul DURHAM RD LN O - I 025 Fil 0-5 MILES (N EQUITY PRIORITY Equity Priority Areas Half Boulevard AREAS = High Equity Priority Railroad 0 6 School CITY OF TIGARD I 1 School Campus HALL BOULEVARD Low Equity Priority Park CORRIDOR STUDY ` City of Tigard alta • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM ai kid Existing and Planned Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks Hall Boulevard is a major link in both the planned pedestrian and bicycle networks for the city(Maps 5, 6).The roadway is designated a "pedestrian corridor" and a "major city bikeway"which emphasize the fact that Hall Boulevard currently does,and will continue to,serve a high number of walking and biking trips in the city in addition to connecting residential, recreational, and commercial areas (Maps 5, 7). Hall Boulevard provides a direct route for people walking to and from residential areas to the downtown core or the Fanno Creek Trail system. Currently, Hall Boulevard has inconsistent sidewalk coverage along its extent. Sidewalk quality varies as well, and the inclusion of ADA accessible curbs and ramps is incomplete.The Murraysmith report notes that 98%of the curb ramps along the corridor will need to be updated to bring Hall Boulevard into a state of good repair.The report also found that of the existing sidewalk infrastructure,only 4% is damaged or inadequate.There are multiple trail and multi-use paths that connect to Hall Boulevard but marked crossings are largely limited to signalized intersections. People walking along Hall Boulevard will need to safely cross to other pedestrian corridors identified in the TSP: Locust St, Oak St, Hwy 99, Hunziker Rd, Commercial St, McDonald St, Bonita Rd, Sattler St, and Durham Rd. Hall Boulevard currently has bike lanes along the project extent.These bike lanes vary in width and level of separation, particularly in places where Hall Boulevard curves and where there are dedicated right turn lanes for motor vehicles.The corridor currently lacks other supporting infrastructure such as bike specific signals,turn boxes, and any physical separators such as curbs and bollards. Future bikeway designs for the roadway will need to support bicycle turning movements to and from other major city bikeways, such as Locust St, Oak St, Hwy 99, Hunziker Rd, Commercial St, McDonald St, Bonita Rd,Sattler St and Durham Rd. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 11 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 69 N.WASHING1•94,4:1 Map 5 II fy Tpr, qLOCU$T:STquerykD41+vE S,' PARK �l 7 ---4 o 7�,,, '. a MAPLELEAF ST a z a o t �� a I La f _r . i-OAK:ST�W�a 1I 1 -'--- -- - 1} dDS. E DOD A M1 �w u n PINE S21. / • C I a BARSl5R8Lv0 ,NAY •Ld •-•-‘ :' .-- — I�.r,i PrNCEST—_ M1 -1 ' Oil' pT2 z~` 14 --mowNORTNQAKOTA S � m x li ap � PFAFFLESF� FIGARs - � f t�3r BAOR ST,fY •=tipt l DODApo' '• Eq rFggl, -,RTH , O r�0I17H ST '3 ST i �WALNUTST = 30H yc PER l' " ' ERROL ST gip. +••• '� WAY 1 C` VQ� .'T.y� oW:"-'. f 6EVELRN!]•Ra > If +II!! x �FONNER S. .ppb� Qq• v �'}'�I i Aik�FS,. t `TT kfiR RpA1P.70N ST 167TH CT POTSo • (t, DELL CT = • Q fi. $ 1 POTS y /N\- ■ •,nay o PARK ST¢ , • G �2A, ,i.`"i� a VARNS ST I + ¢ • m ,k.r1:'', Cao • A 1 x FAIFHAVEN P� J"" v R — S.SL N�/P \/ OMARA ST. ,.V s ,. ' / a FAIRHAVEN %' .,2\/ y., m SANDBDRG y EDGEWOCM ST ST fy GARDENAHILLVIEW ST:'• z, T✓=CH f 1 CENTER OR GAARDE'ST MCDONAL'D'ST \ a /7 BDNIT• 'ARK In. + I MOUNTAlry ViEw ,n. ry % L771 t- IN • WING•,c,p, cc,. I• _ y GREENSWARD. ' m oy • - // -.,,„5.,„,,, ¢ } k a LN .,, �, v DRY.LAI o ��INEZ GT # 60N ITA,RD • ii •. °to -MUR000K-ST P P1NEBROCg •'I � a a� GAR 7 g a it _ � R£! } v N I-A°V L. _ v~i l�'�G ST �r ` ,�7 !ON DR 1 �yALTY Fe W H00DVIEW 11 SATTTLER•ST 00 > R a a �.KABLE ST' }DE DR*DR r, �. 2 SFS ,ti !(ENTON DR I Lh b FLL FLOWER ST p ND OR OREEµLaP .E6 ci w=1 A2H OJ D ST .r�' TER,.� 1- o HAMLET '7�, 45. r.SUMMERFIEL94R�4'r a 2 Sr = - 0it it, - a�4 � 80ND ST r' I 1NrL7gy,DAFDURHAM,RD MEP$ Opp~RD � 1l ; 0 0-25 0-5 MILES fO 2040 TSP PLANNED Pedestrian Corridor . =,, Half Boulevard PEDESTRIAN NETWORK !(sidewalk completed on bath —Trail(Existing) sides) Trail(Planned) • Railroad CITY OF TIGARD Pedestrian Corridor Proposed Active B School HALL BOULEVARD (sidewalk missing on one or Transportation Connection both sides) School Campus CORRIDOR STUDY Neighborhood Greenway Park (sidewalk completed on both sides) City of Tigard alta Neighborhood Greenway (sidewalk missing on one or both sides) 70 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX Map 6 Z WASHINGTON 1 ME TZGER LOCUST ST .. Rp 4I• RE SCh PARK } a II o �a,I �^ a MAPLEC.fAF ST ¢ Z rt do� w OAK ST C = E 005 M1 Dkooss4ii : n PINE S7 rrn gAitBtSR gL`� ll BLACK Aya� - SPRUCE ST n a hyyP. ¢ L T �T yF�, p rz- 1r $7 Pati NORTH DAKOTA ST ' M1 £ I PFFAAFFLF ST ...O i'. N55 a e A it TIGARO,g�. 0.4 rMR y BAriOR ST -tib .- p WOODARO: r• 40f4, 4%52, NORTH 1,� �D+IfH sr .•..�., 7 'RL 3T j°L. c �w0.LNUT ST� SOF7 �i ~ .v ASH ` N WAy� $ ERROL ST $ AVENUE QA t BEVELAND RD > .V 4 }.,-OUT I 4,yr�DO,PARK �, Qr% pY" `Y ` rw+FONNER• 9.1.'C'''''' y • WG G 1,,, I ST �`4TR.RO T`` HAMPTON ST /147tH CT $ n POTSO DOG • ]/ ,ti,DEtLCT C $ PARS/ r ~ ,, `. Y'• •0 n VARNS ST __S::.111, m ?a tARK ST 3 G� �. `. �' ..�t m a "'� J a� ti. 3 M1EAIRHAVEN �, [.fir s d S ST Ns' p OMARA ST 2 FRIRHAVEN 3. a.; SANDBURG EOGEWDOD ST ST [/��J GARDEN HILLVIEW S7 $ T. CENTER DR �'�"•GAAROE-ST MCDONAL'D ST r ROAST\PARK `y r MOUN7A1 w N N viEt !N. FANNO. �. „$fie, y ~GREENSWARD ,'�„ .C22.- '0...., Cy - �q ¢ a k 'Pq a LN �I. v '` 9URYLN R o ~ a� 1NE-2S7 +•+.BONITA•RD. FR � EWT AGE MURDOCK ST p PINEBROOIC' n a, PARK W p V I g e a .. — r4 RSI v $ N LADY Ae._ vi RE/4,,, ST yr ,{L !ON DR �AL7Ypl�" HOODVIEW - 'SA7'TLERST 40 a LQ i i F (CABLE ST SDE DR ❑R _ _ 2 FS KENTON DR i- 1 LRK 6 `BELLFLOWER ST ,ND ORGiy.EtyLE-1 t� ASHFORD ST ER cA SllMMERPIELD 4R 7G �e � ft � .5 y z liA1ALETsr c _ 4,6. CENTIlgV 0,4- 10-.P. CyjkTRD BOND ST" - i .r,if(I¢I 1 DURHAM,RO aOp 0 025 0"5 MILES A EXISTING BIKE NETWORK Bike Lane — Hall Boulevard - Buffered Bike Lane S School CITY OF TIGARD Caution Area School Campus HALL BOULEVARD - Multi-use Path Park CORRIDOR STUDY --- Intermittent Bike Lane ; City of Tigard alta HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 71 Map 7 \wAsHINGT ory. I -TZG R �CCCU.ST:ST II sRzry k0flE k'� RK 1l t• �2 o o M _ _ Q a MAPLEC.FAF ST 71' =. a w i I 'OAK:sT_m�ayJ .1 .,". h d0( oar 1 ^PINE 5T ¢ rgARBUR OA SLACK 9d .. f °. r" L=. 14 Or yam " :SPRUCE ST—•. t 7p), q = F' I � _ A -NORTH.DAKOTA ST m ,..,?„,p _PFAGFLE sr PGA, x TlGARo•y.T, _ wAM a f SA ST I V W _T . „cur.. : e,"4gS G RTrI �s O�TMd+ffHsr w WALNUT=GT OY 30H 'rT �-, I +rF�sT p']�' !!!lam• �,.. ''Y� LI-'-'' MERmoso. ! 45" ERRDC ST s�S . \ I a WAyIr .p• QA 1" 1 BEVEtRNRt]-� a ■ur ST_.„ � ir's. �� J i "FDNNER 5.---.9°" / p q, ' �7YyJ A iP, __t I��TkFR.,Q =HAMIPTON ST 107TH LL a / a` I's.. ,s, POTSO RSG DELL CT = f� e" p.9No,Fl PRRICy/!�I LL day a PARK Sr tic--4.,, 0+ l-y i'±i.. �`f' VARNS ST 3 v IpG�v' •Sy. c'� .• z 1 FAIRHAVEN 1 '''-'4-.-v O7 ? _ • 3 s'�SL -.:. N"' '7'.- ,Sr OMARR ST=•y-�J_ •R,. a FAIRFIAVEN S m SANDSDRG— piGARDENPARK PL , HILLVI EW sr J' _ TECH fI f/! l r: CENTER OR GAARDE'ST '. ' MCDONALO:ST I +1MOUNTA1' SONIT• 'ARK N vlEw r. . 1 Liy _FANNp• C� GREENSWARD m dy - �q C a k LN _ 'T "..-„ SNRY LN—� c ~ w -INEZ sT Z�SONITA:RD- '.I iA S jl t • $UTTE MIJRDOCK"57 ,l PINEBROD1C�' I� a a PAR �`j 3 z a v il ..1i ,REki4e sT N ,�7 w LADY 'WON DR m ra pLTY Fe., W HOODVIEW 1 SATTLER,ST 00 > ,1R'` ¢'"kABLE ST—� i LDE DR tiR_j = n g:, Y,FS KENTON DR x J•I 1 LA -.o a” eELI.FLOWER ST W 1 ^ st4LEN n w x ASHFORD ST ,$''''' fes_ = .r' TER'w.>.� o HAMLRT 'x~1I 4.y . Ir SlIMMERPIELD CR.,047) a Z. S�. c _ •CENTLr�,_Op'E M.Y. �7TkORO DONO sT -DURHAM,Roop 0 025 0.S.MILES . - f- . � : r 2040 TSP PLANNED Major Street Bikeway(Existing Facilities) iiHall Boulevard BIKE NETWORK Major Street Bikeway(Planned) Q School CITY OF TIGARD Neighborhood Greenway(Existing Facilities) School Campus HALL BOULEVARD • --• Neighborhood Greenway{Planned} Park CORRIDOR STUDY Trail(Existing) . City of Tigard Trail(Planned) altaProposed Active Transportation Connection 72 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX MEMORANDUM alta Transit Context Hall Boulevard serves two transit lines, Route 78 north of Hwy 99 and Route 76 between downtown Tigard and Durham Rd (Map 8). Route 76 is a frequent route that intersects another frequent route, Route 12, as well as the WES commuter rail station in downtown. Hall Boulevard would intersect with the proposed Southwest Corridor light rail line,which has a planned station between Commercial St and Hunziker Rd.There are 23 bus stops along Hall Boulevard, but many lack ADA-compliant sidewalk and curb ramp access. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 15 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 73 Map 8 �1;;° wAsH ,2,)4". 4ZR I 2 1 •- •LVCUSTST .I • _ ; ,04„ i \ LAEI:r _`NGLEWOflH �� I " '�.:WNF•sT?ARK c. ,. . P SPRUCE ST ' ii�yIL L irr ( r- � 1 n p :_7.: _ 7 I9AKDTAST-- i - ` � —PF4FFfS —y ,,_, ,dQ r1I apr • ._, 1 %. ird �� -? Y 1i , �\ LAA „R:STa1 _-... ..,e. 01RKstN r .��Y 14- I S �� 'x' NATURE PARK )�� v J : -' � , 000A PO PARK ,p, IFSF' -.'• },•77! . ,�QQT'H sT .. b1611.1.�; ..1 p6..L, �- 'T. �- L �WAI.NUT.ST- V s— ,/-+,, J) I�� *�' 4 ST-ST+ �.aSPy�' ' �4 _�w�Y��- �. il gill IS .,.1,,,,,,,6::// '} ! ‘'"44:1-' \ --IBfEVEL'ANO'IiD r[ j FDNNER 4¢r..i' ,pl - HG f} a NfJ' r / Ik �l [ H� OM 107TH CT o �- ParSa gsic 4, 'iz L. I �, -. II�C— DELL CT,Z..''5 II`l .C4,t, O $ PARK 41 �• - 'y FaIPARK-ST¢ G� bR, ' � -* RNs sT - 1 �,-•� e, � 1 3 A q :), CREEKPFRFANNO '� = hifSL a7 1' 1 7fi lJ� ©111--\p f1kFiJL a 1�l��IILkII��II�� IJ 1 s • / 7,_JUL. ... 1 111 FL____ � '1(��} ` J I�,—�. \+ G EDGEWODD ST- -1 HDSDRG ` 1 `IHI PARI(PL--J " HILLVIEW:ST 4y .1 TSH V l U • - JI `� , _ CENTER DR- � ,�� G„i• .,. ,LI MNALD sT�� IL �� r' �L it r", S a J .,k-,-..11 MOUNTA� n (] ,�gONITS?�..v' 0. /. fj� f '} �,thr IFANND It, �_-. L SWARD ,'a ¢ ,,,__R k� �� I LHS; 124-'21 `'LT�7,911RY:CN-&—o� r�P`iNF2`5 l� E+ _ P SONITA'RD I rl 1 it—� �C 11 EAST '••r ERS MIJRDOCM•F� �4 �PIHEBR001C� � g_, � g ��C jy,'�C' ti lil .•=- i_REII �' a ~ 1sr mA �� • 1-� j~c°LADY NoR l L, 71 4 ter' ��1 I[ i �,tL 11 -HOODVI✓:W SA77LER ST f a .,: p1TKpf` Liut s+ �� nIiDifs r=4l i I a d rF z=KABI.E ST--. -. �c1DE'OR.:.9R I KENTON DR r iikh, — LI, r ii�,rr SELLFLDWER sT. re; �'� I�.pND ORJ` ENLEAF J�� :2r¢n �J � __��ASHFORD ST ■i I • 4 BM MI- �,j,N' TER y. Lk o �77 1 _ j 5 S }I.AfALE7�=� 7 . q-rj-,1lMMERFIEL9,flR 011 f-. IT '' 2 l ST ct.,_—_]. 7 i . ,,,,•,,,s,', 1 �y ,,,,,_,,,o,,.. .„9i., ORD 1 - LR_I: �iJP- 44111'71 1 0 I a' s-- - DllRHgM RD �.. • TRANSIT CONTEXT RAIL LINE 6 Transit Center Proposed Southwest • Bus Stop Corridor Light Rail Hall Boulevard CITY OF TIGARD — WES Commuter Rail HALL BOULEVARD School CORRIDOR STUDY School Campus BUS ROUTE Frequent Service Park alta infrequent Service Railroad City of Tigard 74 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM aiIP.- kid Vehicular and Truck Traffic As noted previously, Hall Boulevard is designated as an Arterial in the City's TSP.Arterials are designed for higher volumes but tend not to be major regional travel ways. Minor arterial streets provide inter-neighborhood connections.According to the TSP,there are two Hall Boulevard intersections that are consistently delayed due to traffic: Hall Boulevard& McDonald St,and Hall Boulevard & Durham Rd. Although the corridor is needed for freight traffic, Murray Smith reports that truck traffic accounts for 2.9%of the annual average daily traffic(AADT).The maximum annual average daily traffic(AADT) reported by ODOT for SW Hall Boulevard is 17,000,with truck traffic accounting for 2.9 percent of the AADT.According to City traffic count data,the highest traveled segment is between McDonald St and Bonita Rd, due to east-west travel along McDonald St and Bonita Rd (Map 9). Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 17 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 75 Map 9 i� � 794 +.��J�1�-7� ��-R ,��1�..�� rl 331 �� f_!. ... � r'V METZG SCI GD n L. 6 34 1 r' fl 1568 '. J�1 flr _ J i� 2111 4��.�� JJI �� 127 1070 �lJ�I ,_„��. ENGIEWO b 5621759 i 1. RK 541• .+ . .� 4 r:f'.11 I —r.. r..--- + {/ ' a. I. r 1575+'853 825s-' .. . 7 � 4tiLi� 2667 ,�` 12 461• rj 4942 = .1`lye! 282 5283 /1 `LIJ� G U” � ��84 ^^ jl. 63845309 _,n.13 X11 2 _./.0.2'. �- 3 it 7..3 J � o+Rxs�nr 1 n1= \11 `v "$6991535822• II \- NATURE 747 4j �. 1+� • r• 12509 572 . 9.8. _,--;-:::-V •. z•� .L -� 9 0,13014_12765 �� .L_ 13013-4 5934 1 - F 80P�q • WOODARD PARK "■r'r; .,; RI( ±� 656 ,/ 529 . ; •3p 13825 J� 8207 ;_,.. I 125 448 16:''' '�'+:, , � , ' �Jza9 •- t • �� 400 LI n F c , r A�` 527• 10441 ter 1300 p 23,7_, 986 71:p AVE•'•wBOG A p� 9 f s - PARV•43' 79 89 r11 LJL I�____I `fI} 104 Pars lip_,,. n' �I : l LJ F. 250 ^,, 5 DOGPI3RK ��f`y J�• 588 PAroNa ,--f�_.1[ ` LI .17Q3 1' •UVJ JJ CREEK PARK I o J[ .3 5 51 - j[I 6_ T71 �J � 0 _ JJ ilai2f-i.: .,„ r'• 6 ��-_.4c404 �L $p 1186 • JJ� 1059 - - J 679 1402:,. 12574 10547 117052115 �, - - 1 1284 594 �. ��# jpp ,1 • 353 720 012994 ;/ } 1 .997 509 sPaPK _`�_ 3237 1565 ��.._ L = __�JJ 470 501 11272 1739712700 17394 143 ' � ?455 1179 — l • [.14716• 7 i.: 6a94_:�STEUTTE1 117245 6 J _I 1259 174 11902 C 1794 393 NERAG 933 6347 nARx 4 1068 1043 i 548 7 ±i_ 793 1279 �� 2099 EL 4056 4490 474 t� 3190 4572 1472 1843 984 1895 4485 �` a= 1917 1 'A 2170 228 198 / : '1' A9 ! 9665 .' lrir 1,.....n____-_- : 432275 1089 10158 1060 334 426 497 +81438 845 140 2390 408 23• 400 :.'T' :.-� *18760 76618436 219 14583 609 622 16584 1296441 fJ I - I • 788• 117 r w --• ...�• 7 0 025 +�'�yh_ r1.S MILES f� -i} TRUCK ROUTES & Current Average Daily Traffic(ADT) Truck Routes TRAFFIC COUNTS 45- 1300 Hall Boulevard 1301 -3237 Railroad CITY OF TIGARD • 3238-6934 6 School HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY • 6935- 11712 School Campus • 11713- 18760 Park alta .1:::: City of Tigard 76 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM alta Collisions and Safety WINA.Kgia0.alSW y Aura Pin Ammar ° While the highest levels of EPoD Ranges vehicular traffic on Hall Boulevard —8.3.15° - 2.3.6-2 jy•-.. exists between McDonald St and -0.5.22 Bonita Rd,three different areas 07"DF Pans. • 4--<71.,.., stand out when it comes to bicycle Cayliaal7ary and pedestrian traffic: Downtown, _...-0 e "" /\ l'-'4?°,....2\ e the Fanno Creek Trail,and Durham 1 Rd (Map 10).The Transportation ! • ..0 a.. Safety Action Plan (TSAP)found i M• ..^ T' - that these areas also showed some '• i a e of the highest crash rates in the ! I ..,,.. w r—__. city(see figure to the right). i6 1 [I a5 1 1.5Imes The TSAP found that in Tigard, Segment Screening Fig,, pedestrian and bicyclist crashes i Tigard Equivalent Property Damage Only Weighting q� Tigard.Oregon constitute an outsize share of , - KI TELSON &ASSOCIATES fatal/Injury A crashes relative to their overall share of crashes: Among the 61 reported pedestrian crashes (throughout the city 2013-2017),the following patterns were identified: • 46 pedestrian crashes(85 percent)occurred at arterial intersections. • 30 pedestrian crashes(49 percent)occurred in dark,dawn,or dusk conditions(19 in dark conditions with street lights,six in dark conditions without street lights, and five under dusk/dawn conditions). • 36 pedestrian crashes(59 percent)were coded to indicate as a motorist's failure to yield right-of-way. Of those, 18 crashes(50 percent)were right-turning crashes. Among the 65 reported bicycle crashes(throughout the city 2013-2017),the following patterns were identified: • 53 crashes were turning movement crashes. • The most frequent crash types were right-hooks at both signalized and unsignalized intersections. • Right hooks have occurred on Hall Boulevard at the intersection of Hwy 99. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 19 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 77 MEMORANDUM dl �� According to the most recent crash data from ODOT,there have been 8 vehicles that have crashed into pedestrians and bicyclists on Hall Boulevard between 2016-2020(Map 11).These are only reported incidents, however. Contemporary research estimates that about half of bicycle and pedestrian involved crashes are actually reported.1 Additionally, low bicycle and pedestrian crash rates do not necessarily indicate safer roadways; in some cases, unsafe roadways have low crash rates because people are discouraged from walking and biking along them. One of the biggest factors in crash severity is speed.The Washington Square Regional Center plan calls for a speed reduction on Hall Boulevard from 40 to 35 between Pfaffle St and Locust St. 1 A study of bicycle and pedestrian crashes in New York,California,and North Carolina found that only 43%to 67%of bicycle-motor vehicle crashes identified in hospital emergency data were identified in state crash data,while 45%to 68%of pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes were identified(Stutts&Hunter, 1999).A more recent study examining hospital records of traffic crash victims in New York City found similar results:only 50%of pedestrians and 45%of cyclist crash victims could be linked to police crash records,compared to 63%of drivers(Conderino et al.,2017).A study of bicycle-related injuries at San Francisco General Hospital found that,from 2000 to 2009,of 2,504 patients treated for bicycle-related injuries,54.5% were not associated with a police report(Lopez et al.,2012). AASHTO Council on Active Transportation Research Roadmap(July 2021). https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP20-123-02AASHTOCATResearchReview.pdf Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard 78 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX Map 10 WASHING)-04, +P 40 • 4-2 LOCUST ST ` 98 z H 'QU M 2GER 7 m ARE SG}f ARRK a- a 77 g N �^ 54 7 3 a h7APLECEAF ST y = ,g (] ti 5'� IRo1iE' q �W y?,. 1-4 pi r OAK ST: s 4 2 .o i ENGLEWOnng r° r PARK 3 ,- 3.5 :.FINE ST '. F gABguRaLVn SLAe,90 _ R wAv t L -SPRUCE ST 3 R 4 72 78 yy a 23 2Tj a ,i1 fi-.et19 NORTH DAKOTA ST • 2 � 1' 34 84 30 you PFAFFLf GT '34- 4 : x TIGARD sr a 10_.i6 A'` _ 5-�Y.' 46 68 a a 5 9▪ OIRKSEN = a BAYLOR 57 S▪ NATURE PARK a N a 22 L7 I 152 as e5 47 ' 121 r4/ N sr 4$ } ��'rHsr.. 10 23,� AL •'SWALNUT ST W O A D .47.. ¢ 1{y��,88 Ssd' i s • . O 27 3$$ r�r NEwr,rnsa ERROL ST 18 sy. AY i S>F.. •o- 8 32 BEVELANO RD Y ASN AV DOG PARK = FONNER S', 0:00 p12 -34 cy 217(107 43 ,19 'ti�,.h. R❑ HA!{rpiDN ST • 4 107TH CT 41 3 FANNO .s CREEK 4sr3_51 porno Dor, G+ c.4 DERC DELL $ 40,cc4, e. SPARK 82 25A PARK �■- 3 -7 4- (%t, V,PARK ST 9i. �J+� F'45}. 11 —"-41 1 S VARNS ST 4Fes+ FAIRHAVEN x y,< a 2-.A 14 54 9 A < S7} b �. Sw 4° 11 a FAIRHAVEN RP U`? m SANQBURG Napy If EDGEWOOD Si E 5T , TECH 15 CAl � HILLVIEW 5i 6 CENTER DR GAAROE ST 111). 33 ii.- 20 MCDONALD ST 24-o -16 �r 11 EONITA PARK 4 MOIJNTArp VIEW `� } LAr FAIJNO C �- O ; GREENSWARD M1 ¢ L" A e: 13 9 FfiBURY w E. 2 INEZ sr 19-sem 24 • 21-ifL 55 ,SBONITA RD is EAST 8 36 a - BUTrE HERITAGE )II 4 � PINEBROOK . 15 a Sw PARK 7 y135 a I 3 `Rellnycsr LADY 34 R 4, r �yAL7Y N0555 WaH QR 9 i EATTLER ST 25-�#-35 °° > > .,..Lr 4 kABLE ST {DE DR 9R = I • z 'K5 q- REM-1.°N DR a Lp'!- d BELLFLOWER ST DDR AF 'r Y U ASHFORD Sr ,,f0" GETER o 13 y., z _ a SUMMERFIEL9 DR OR .3q¢ .� � �4 HS7"T q Q.k-S' r 138 a�� • tig$° CErrrm 01••• �' YS 38 51 IF : BOND sT^ - 1 14e I 17- P DURHAM RD el 48 4w 6610_55 X23-oh 0 0-25 0-5 MILES MOST RECENT BICYCLE Bike Count Pedestrian Count Hall Boulevard Study Area AND PEDESTRIAN COUNTS ' 1 ' 1 Q School • 5 • 10 School Campus CITY OF TIGARD • 10 • 50 Park HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY • 50 • 100 � Railroad • 1001 000 City of Tigard alta HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 79 Map 11 ------ :4,.S>7U M�7LfiEIJ LCCUSh57 nn 1i1�' '"' 11-0a �/�`�� \ROryYYm .. • IIAAE S FIgi;F. ii �r 'I1 'Ei& „,_,.c.,. a N a'^ , .1 4'.—�-�r- --,I-MAKELEAF ST 4 ti -.. `—dO a 4 1 OAK'ST - ',- c z c e �`� ENGLEWOJ� 'M ?' x ^� -, ! qRKn PILAF.ST ¢ gL'ro BIAClt0'Aty7p-'`rte �'.= .I•, ' SPRUCE ST r( s i yf, -1I J �J Her 0 0 '11` lr 41 ,,1 "J 4 �] �P 11. .I NORTH.DAKOTA$T by r m a' _ P �L e� -J for S Y4{ Oce O 7 PFR r}I F or '�I�JLL JI L`1 l4' EN ORIL.',' I Cii Q ' - !� aIRICSEN if_r"). t a f '-. 4,..< LSAIROR sT - ! INATURE PARKJL= '' , nom q`yy7 e1 IIlijiIll, N.,./...tax 007ARD PARK F A .. N�':'N ST,' ti '7 n `7�:RCY4(f sr ee.A. IA! `• . .oLS '•,'` g ff (t �: �� 1 YfALN11T ST x-- /SOh} *C ,. a 1' [ {�-ERROL ST 'j � •�� A �) LbLt '14 '... /bA -• r �! „/O 0 FI 1111 FCF ,�nELLGI z pt%1r�� .ysh'o�{0 FANNO PARK y"+ \ �F 4 "Pel, '°/Gy, $ NARK$T 9 �� . 4 CREEK PARK � z-VARNS ST t • Lar �r}� r� E 44 k a ' t] v F FAIR4IAVEN � ®� ..' .�, pS tea," �8 �� ' ' -p r' .ST.� N•` �h� �-OMRRR ST. j V U T ijir,Jfr 11/ Fr FRI R R AVE �qn \f SAItlQBURG >ry,.d o �f —=• Sr TECH 'SI, l�. \x� i T a• HIL LVIEW ST A to _ j_ �, y}.[� cCEHTER OR ,ARV+'R.. _ GiRE Sr h9CO0NAl.p;T r_-- Ark 1,,.. KM n !l F .00,4i.,,„„..„,,,,„ ARK ip „:„..,/,e, '� toy fRvh'D (:,..0 Q a GRFFNSwARri 1—` R..1 y . 4.Cq • L. � 'NiRF LN r' n� a a 0 'FOORY LH rr ti P P INFZ O i " BDN Th R J - , EAST 6 `� J +*` If �C E'f''. E MUFDOCAGT RINFRRDDR�F I� ii JL �17 tl: J ! I S* 6 1. I yL ��,VI �: YRFI� !^ 'W ..I r a ._-_.. RE.,,,,,,G,.,51 a ' LADY:411/40N 1:4 r-'!'.;1 .1 .} Nr�:.0 -- --�.,. ,yL w=HGODVIfW� SATICLR Sia w - I! � O{hL7Y pr 1 ry ¢ 4 , F C KABLE ST---: {',]FGR R z +Z 'I - z LAKE+ .r K[Ni❑PJ DR m ,f ^. � O Bal l FI C]4VFR ST . i+':. U \GHLp]dD DR GREiAILCAf r' n m ]'�.!-��Jlf_LLASH ioRD sri r l �rj� �taUMMERElEL9iDRyg.aa] _ ''S 1 j s { 6 U j Ij II OO1l l � Il Dc.� 4e , �I,NiUFryoR'�- P' Grp BOND ST ("- i ::�� DURHAir}:RD - •- ��pa'b 0 0-25 0.5 MILE`, lr-lJ Irk 47,x"i '1 n f �I1 A 0 VEHICLE CRASHES WITH 0 Bicycle Crash Hall Boulevard PEOPLE WALKING AND 0 Pedestrian Crash • Railroad BIKING 2016 - 2020 Q School CITY OF TIGARD School Campus HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY Park City of Tigard altaSource:Oregon Department of Transportation 80 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX MEMORANDUM I _ ai kid Key Development Areas One of Tigard's strategic priorities is to create a well-connected pedestrian network that links all Tigard residents and businesses.The land use map on the following page demonstrates how Hall Boulevard connects residential areas to commercial areas, particularly those in the downtown core and the Tigard Triangle (Map 12).The changing land use throughout the corridor helps to break the project extent into three conceptual sections: North (Locust St to Hwy 99), Central (Hwy 99 to the Fanno Creek Trail),and South (Fanno Creek Trail to Durham Road).The juxtaposition of the industrial areas to the east of downtown to the downtown commercial district/the Fanno Creek recreational areas to the west and south contributes to mixing large trucks with people walking and biking in those areas.To the north,there is interest in potentially designating the mixed-use areas along Hall Boulevard an Oregon "Main Street" between Oak St and Locust St according to the Washington Square Regional Center Redevelopment Plan (2021). Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 23 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 81 Map 12 wwwr F47 ... E._-__r� II / t! 7 ff n .o y f..G. - y LaCusryMF. .. 3 1ROy� ARE a' 1 a 1 2 a o 3A ¢^ 11 caf1C MAPLELEAF$T a ❑ 99 If,�OAK.SIT.- o a 'O m Se d�ENGL c'3 ` 2 t) r ^ w PAF - o'er ` IL r~�..PINE ST N •DA '8L4D BLACK4 7p - 11� � : 10001 WAY yo - _ . SPRucE ST .1 n� 4 .----4Ari...." .i:-.--''''''' _IE- Lr' g p-74' NORTH DAKOTA'$T . 6Y-). a c �wot,'g NgURG LL€ST m TIGARD ST aD I.- F z a 6"' v _ - �r NAiiiiiiT�� ' 9 DR KSEN 5.' z I •� NATfJR✓=PARK or, ��;� . p WOODARD PARK � Fq�, TERSE J .! �`ry� DA '�'�117N 5 F'—�� - . Ell : .-.... • . ..:•• WALNUT ST = SOyy /+: • ERROL 5T t� - '£A WAy R Cr •+k,':. • �� BEV•EL4ND Olt a • EDNNER SS PAS y, 1: I' . ',� HG H. - - J --'. W1,r,24-„i,1:5. . .,,.. T+,. • NrkRD i a, l I( . 107TH CT .W • dpi g,.: + Pq C]f]OG 1 �L-..J � DELL Ci , _:.G+,,, -� Yz+ 6?-, q,SHay PR' v \ ,I 7j- �%a4..� a PARK ST a car' Y .(f1R FA ., n VARN5 ST mi,► 1�z :j /ro '1-2�� S��n '�SANQBLIRG I ' GARDEN EDGEW0001T TECH SA ` © PARR PL HILLVIEW Si A llfl z �y CENTER QR ' ,_ GAARpE ST. MCQOkALD ST _ rIONITA PARK X MOUNT LINVIEW n Sy w:Q— _______ '¢ N �-sk71 �D„de, I w GRFFN55.1ARIl y O ¢ a 4 LI LN 0 x [1'y IMP �tBURY LN ¢ g p rn 1N E2 5' BONITA RD. . W li _i—;_.._ ir EAST 2' rg BUTTE HERITAGE MURDOCK ST PiNFRRDOR`' ¢ _. .• PARK 0 IL. a q a H YRF711 C 'I tr LRQY 44 _ 'VG 51 1 m ,�L c`n R7ON DR ■ �yALTY Pf-"- LA HOSDVIEW SATTLER ST 00 a. _.,;r' d r F KABLE ST 1oF DR GR z r Z � .r FEN DR � LAY' �� Ob 8EIIFI OWER ST alOH�pS1Q OR C.REENLEAF 44'x2, I � ASHFORD ST L TERN V o ! M1RWL✓=7 7 5`� SIJMMERFIELD 9R GR �4 '4S a I- r S, a ael: k- z ti¢�14- CENTURy p0.'F' MC C,rFORD DONS ST^ I F? (�) 1 DURHAM RD Ole !t 0 0.25 0.5 MILES LAND USE CONTEXT Zoning Group [—}Hall Boulevard Study Area = Commercial 45 school CITY OF TIGARD Industrial HALL BOULEVARD School Campus CORRIDOR STUDY = Central Business District Park = Parks and Recreation City of Tigard Residential alta m Mixed Use/Tigard Triangle 82 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM alto, Right-Of-Way According to Murraysmith,the current right-of-way width along SW Hall Boulevard are a 100-foot width south of Pacific Highway/OR 99W, and a 76-foot width north of Pacific Highway/OR 99W.The vast majority of the street length (91 percent)does not meet current standards for right-of-way width. More than two-thirds of the street length (68 percent) has a right-of-way width that is significantly(more than 10 feet) less than the standard. More than half of the roadway length does not have enough right-of-way space to provide the basic facilities(such as sidewalks)that would be expected in an urban corridor such as this. Map 13 shows the estimated widths of publicly owned right-of-way based on tax lot data,completed in ArcGIS. Note that these widths are not exact and have not been measured by a surveyor.The map is only intended to provide an approximation of the right-of-way along the Hall Boulevard corridor. (In addition,the gaps in the measurements are the product of the analytical process used to derive the widths,which does not measure at intersections.)The map shows how right-of-way availability varies considerably along the Hall Boulevard corridor.The most constrained areas along the corridor are shown in red. Generally speaking,the widths follow a similar pattern to the North-Central-South conceptual breakdown of the roadway.The central section near downtown is particularly narrow where Hall Boulevard curves and crosses the railroad. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 25 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 83 Map 13 4‘..'D �7 , C WAShI[e1 f:1t R,�_r. _ .. S F t Z SODA:G�'�N IOh;UST til 1 kc a 6 _ a MAPLELEAF S7 d :1 V. OAK ST a n ea ', . �` A PINES[ N 5A4L9i]kpGVO 'a r BLAI:Y'p `t.. y - .. - .•SPRUCE'S-F c• . K'AY 1 Qy Y i rry , NORTH DAKOTA T y_ l 1 ? v a /l x r i ��` ._ Y= , r D m y I OAvt DR ST A 'r r. c�ti ;":01-ESO!',,a '4. t. 81-04 r. /� vY'�rL .442.e'''''''..4 rErvs ART.NC�KT' Z rte. OWN Si �, fy7 7pr�, -1S. 'A[ n SOHO MI.NUT ST ❑ yu^ , a� per l LHiiVL S I' �pP '•VAY n LLI a y ,_ . FOtJNER ST V7• 41...4., ., .%-''' Y DOG: ,Sp� I4 1 ,'•.FH W �S�C,, 'C� 4173,s,fez, HAggpTCJN ST 1 . !I {.FELL CT v¢i l F 5 • rN '1 2 ' kE'ry y ' S 1JJ 0 4 PARK S I 0' g S ^:1„.-- <C 1g Y YAi4NS 57 v. w W T C 5❑ G S'T Ni..:-:' •-, r � ¢T }�.R g �i f: c FAiR''AVF.N i y- f'q ST 2. s P ❑MAJUA ST w o ❑ P i ~FAIRHA'.i �iP 3-' m r oR GARDEN .\' Ok fi. EWGSWOODSI J i •+ .- { PARI(NI" ISI LLVIEW ST A Q TECH S,1F1 L'S is1C1 CENTER DP GMP[JE S f MCOONALf)S1 aJ 1 LU V7Fw LN a, "IVTSO-[`rr .' ¢ %. uu.. GRLE NSLVAi;L1j fi r�= - r Thi � 0 IN R lF Pte- ❑ rNLl Sf E .49i1RY'Lta i i BONIFARD i. o M:IRCCC+CI i $ ST pi NE BRCO K i Y 6 + C ---Aar MAW° i_REiI a G OR i, N 1A4z ST I v O,[(;l TY}"f'1 w HDO4]VIEWO YATTIER ST V • ; KAEILE ST ]1 \Dt❑H A[l�5 p a.1- ;" EI1#I OYER S' HEN a H I 1 ,Nil❑k :;tif Etii E7.F '2 Z O 5[;i�# .4S1iF[.7Hn S I Gr F: 1ERZ R00-U D9-5u'_' 0 w TGO!'.._ - Z• A $[1Ms,'e y y 2 HAMI E f aE' -,,, f0A•Y .4 , S ST O''9-0 9Lfi �� CENfu ASO F rn f BOND SI - 3 ....:4...P F7Y O (1AK b'[Fr rA7 F�Z[) 1 OURHA0.c RD [I9 -0,0 - ¢ 0 025 0"5.1.1I1,ES RIGHT-OF-WAY Right-Of-Way Width (Ft) Hall Boulevard OPPORTUNITIES 50-62 — Trails & CONSTRAINTS Railroad 72 ET Publicly Owned ROW CITY OF TIGARD 6 School HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY — 82 School Campus alta Park 110-134 City of Tigard 84 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM ai kid Opportunities and Constraints The Hall Boulevard corridor is a critical connection in the City's transportation system. It is heavily utilized by many different types of travelers,for different trip purposes,along a range of frontage and land use contexts. In examining the existing conditions of the roadway, it's apparent that improvements are needed for Hall Boulevard to meet arterial standards.Among the many constraints that emerged in our analysis, many opportunities are also present that offer the potential for Hall Boulevard to be premier active transportation corridor within the city's existing and planned networks. Constraints • Currently,the roadway lacks complete infrastructure for all users.Gaps remain in the sidewalk network, both in terms of missing segments and the provision of ADA accessible curb ramps. Most existing sidewalks are 6ft wide and do not have a landscaping strip separating the walkway from traffic,which reduces the level of comfort for people walking. More recently installed sidewalks,such as those between Langtree St and Ashford St,are 8 ft wide and are more comfortable.Sidewalks on the east side of Hall Boulevard between Ross St and Murdock St have landscaping strip separation but abruptly end before reaching the bus stop to the north. • Improving sidewalk connections(and expanding the roadway footprint generally) may be more costly in areas with significant grade differences,such as the ditch north of Sattler St on the west side,and the low- lying areas around the Hall Boulevard/Bonita Rd intersection. • Despite serving the frequent service Route 76,some bus stops along Hall Boulevard remain inaccessible to all users.These stops include the intersections of Murdock St and McDonald St(northbound). • With the exception of the Fanno Creek Trail Crossing and the RRFB just north of Hwy 99,the only marked crosswalks exist at signalized intersections.The distances between these crosswalks range from roughly 900 ft(Wall St to the Fanno Creek Trail crossing)to well over a half mile(north of Hwy 99).The lack of crossings for people walking and biking limits the east-west connectivity of these networks at Hall Boulevard. • A few intersections that already have marked crosswalks with signals have documented concerns regarding safety.These include the Fanno Creek Trail, Hwy 99,and Durham Rd. • Hall Boulevard has complete bike lanes along the project extent, but these lanes are insufficient except for the strongest and most fearless of riders.The bike lanes range from 4-6 ft, buses mix with bike lanes at all stops,and there are three notable floating bike lanes that cross right turn pockets:the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Bonita Rd,the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Knoll Dr,the southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Burnham St,and the northbound/southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Hwy 99. Each of these conditions contribute to a less comfortable environment for people biking. • Available right-of-way appears to be most constrained in the central section, between Hwy 99 and the Fanno Creek Trail. Proposed bikeway facility types may need to be different in this section than the North and South sections.Tradeoffs will be difficult here without expanding the available ROW because the downtown area is a critical area for transportation connections and should have some of the most robust facilities for all users. • In addition to the more detailed constraints above,that the visioning project will need to account for the following factors that add complexity to Hall Boulevard: o The east-west traffic needs between McDonald St and Bonita Rd. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 85 MEMORANDUM d 1 o The sensitive environmental context around Fanno Creek. o The railway crossing between Burnham St and Commercial St. o The offset skew of the Hunziker St-Scoffins St-Hall Boulevard intersection. o The inter-jurisdictional nature of Hwy 99/Hall Boulevard and the Highway 217 Crossing. In these locations,the Hall Boulevard visioning project will likely need to focus less on design specifics and more on recommendations for ODOT. Opportunities • That Hall Boulevard connects parts of the city with distinct land use contexts is a strength of the corridor. Increasing multi-modal connectivity between residential areas and commercial districts would greatly improve the corridor's ability to serve different trip types and users as well as fulfill City goals. Hall Boulevard has the potential to connect people to parks,schools,the Tigard Public Library,City Hall,the WES commuter rail,the future SWC light rail,Washington Square, and the Tigard Triangle. • The Hall Boulevard visioning project is highly relevant to the interests of downtown Tigard.Collaborating and coordinating with the ongoing Downtown Reimagined project presents an opportunity to improve public engagement. • Completing sidewalks on both sides of Hall Boulevard is a significant opportunity for the city's pedestrian network,which designates Hall Boulevard as a major pedestrian corridor. • One opportunity that Hall Boulevard presents is to build on a current strength of the corridor: inter- neighborhood biking and walking trips.Along Hall Boulevard,there are many neighborhood cut-through paths,which increase the east-west connectivity for people walking and biking.These paths could serve as natural locations for mid-block crossings between signalized intersections. Potential crosswalks could include those at: Bonaventure Ln,Ashford St,and Bellflower St. • Other potential crosswalk improvements that emerged from the existing conditions analysis include the north leg of McDonald St/Hall Boulevard and the north leg of Omara St/Hall Boulevard. • For the Fanno Creek Crossing,there are multiple opportunities to improve the safety for people walking and biking. One or more RRFBs may be more effective than the existing pedestrian hybrid beacon. Depending on the bikeway design,curb extensions may be possible to reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians.There may also be space for a refuge island. • The future bikeway along Hall Boulevard has the potential to create safe connections to other major links in the bicycle network. First,the future Fanno Creek trail extension on the southeast corner of Hall Boulevard/Durham Rd will need to be accommodated in the visioning plan. Durham Rd,Sattler St, Bonita Rd, McDonald St,Commercial St, Hunziker St,Oak St,and Locust St are all designated major street bikeways. Bike turn boxes and advanced queuing facilities should be considered at these intersections to help people riding bikes make turns to and from those corridors. • For a high-traffic arterial like Hall Boulevard, bicycle facilities for people of all ages and abilities will need to be as protected and separated from traffic as possible.Some segments, like in the South section of the corridor, may have enough available right-of-way to install protected bike lanes through lane width reduction and elimination or reduction of center turn lanes. In more constrained areas,we may need to look for solutions that raise the bicycle facility's grade, potentially combining with walkways in a shared use path Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard 86 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM dl tvrod design. Intersections such as McDonald St, Bonita Rd, Durham Rd, Oak St and Locust St in particular should be examined for their ability to accommodate a fully protected intersection. • The section of Hall Boulevard between Langtree St and Ashford St is particularly wide. If the rest of the corridor isn't widened to match this width,then the extra space here could be repurposed into a more highly protected bikeway,stormwater catchment basin,or both. • Several right turn pockets could be reevaluated as part of the Hall Boulevard visioning project.These include the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Bonita Rd,the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Knoll Dr, and the northbound/southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Hwy 99.The most likely of these to be eliminated would be at Hall Boulevard/Knoll Dr. • The most constrained area is the Central section between the Fanno Creek crossing and Hwy 99. Expanding right-of-way between Burnham St and the railroad may best come from the City's public works property. • There is a significant amount of space on the Hwy 217 bridge that could be repurposed for more protected biking and walking facilities. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 87 NN. • r , 1, 1 ! "^ly. • . '.jr r y4f • 1 t.;-;.-..: 7.,-;-,--: +4`.." :..- _.,„,,,.....:.--.7.,-; `. � • '"1, isiff i " lrik., _ bf , 9 ' yva' • - 5`.,' f. 4t '+ ' - • �• f• '` ;E 4.— , -:-.00,„,. - `•:t �, ' . �'•i.4'i,14,:-. ts. �i�wt�✓ I l' t r l' i l ; l',,'-'"'.-.;.;, ';.',;?.,:0,,..� ',may_."' 4''',47-.:p. N f • i • •i f• 4 R ;Pt t Ka r �A o :. ~o lea -;•'.;;7-17,1't--i4.,4.4; dk.' .L - j'' i i { `a.,t4a•,+.- -.- "mow 9w., .a,y, l'A' .'' . Az ' . Z ..:- •••• ' '''-,:: -!-,..Y.1 . 0 .:-"k. 1."-' __. ' - . pii*,,,,.. ,../.7_,. :- ,„ toor J. ,„, i - _�1. i. •�A4•',,tq, . . S . - =ter' ,. ` %6. _- 1 ` 1 t _.e ..1. :i -i Cil+yd`'fr _ - �� r- _ .. 4 , �,,�.l 0. et,t !. - .�. - • , , _ ....,,,_ _,,.... , .. . .. ..,40. i• r-4 N. tit e ti elpikI1 0 CITY OF • • Tigard