Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Resolution No. 24-07
CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 24- O A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISION CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT WHEREAS, the city's adopted strategic vision calls for Tigard to be "an equitable community, that is walkable, healthy,and acceptable to all;"and WHEREAS, Policy 1 of the 2040 Transportation System Plan requires the city to "provide a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users,especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users;"and WHEREAS, the city's Complete Streets Policy envisions Tigard as a "vibrant and healthy community where people of all ages and abilities can travel safely, efficiently, and comfortably on a well-connected and optimized multi-modal network of roads,trails,and paths;"and WHEREAS, Southwest Hall Boulevard within the City of Tigard is not maintained to a standard of quality that is acceptable to the community;and WHEREAS, Southwest Hall Boulevard within the City of Tigard is not built to a standard of design that safely and comfortably serves roadway users of all ages and abilities;and WHEREAS,Action 4.1 of the 2023-25 Council Goals is to "[i]dentify;and secure funding to complete the Hall Boulevard jurisdictional transfer;"and WHEREAS, House Bill 2793 created a jurisdictional transfer advisory committee and application process requiring local agencies to submit an adopted "community vision plan" to be eligible for consideration for state funding;and WHEREAS, the Council desires to formalize the community's vision for a future Southwest Hall Boulevard in the city through adoption of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Vision Concept Design Report and to have this document inform future policy direction,planning efforts,and amendments to city codes and standards. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The Tigard City Council Adopts the Hall Boulevard Corridor Vision Concept Design Report attached hereto as Exhibit A and made part of this Resolution. SECTION 2: This Resolution is effective immediately upon passage. ii PASSED: This l day of r`'t �hi 2024. RESOLUTION NO. 24- a Page 1 Mayor-City of Tigard A'1'LEST: ?'-1( City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 24- 0 Page 2 • .. ,,.' 2.Y T --i:....- • a ,•c, 'S t.M ... r r �y:.: ' •s• . .\.. 334 y .y-j-.1. ,-.•• :. .,�4_.,..�;.. 1r:•..a , • •'�i . v _ .ti. .7,t -_ ce ` ,• .ix Y 4- � fir. .... • $ fir' Y xiliie • • • . �'�.' " T s �. � a - • � r . ' • • " ' • y • fi . : 74:. 9-_A.- a k ', ' - • • _ tt r : -r _ 'ms's`f` • .I. "` r rerr I i. ___+..r _. .. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT February 2024 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dave Roth, Principal Transportation Planner Joe Wisniewski, City Engineer Alta Planning + Design. Derek Abe and Philip Longenecker, Consultant Team Thanks to Tigard's Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) and members of the Tigard community who provided invaluable input during the engagement process. Adopted by Tigard City Council February 13, 2024 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMAIif 4. PLANNING PROCESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 PLANNING PROCESS 28 Key Takeaways from Public Engagement Efforts 30 1 . PURPOSE 5. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW? 6 Purpose 7 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 32 Jurisdictional Transfer 8 From Plan to Project: Throughline from the TSP 33 Tigard and ODOT's Shared Work Plan and A New Vision for Hall Boulevard 33 Memorandum of Understanding 8 High-Level Concept Shaped by City Values and Tigard's Transportation Public Input 33 System Plan 9 Segment and Perspective Views 36 The Metro Area's Urban Arterial Problem 9 Why Three Lanes?Wouldn't More Lanes Be Better? 45 2. DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY Key Intersections 46 Recommendations Table 48 DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY 10 Tigard's Complete Street Policy 11 6. IMPLEMENTATION Tigard's Transportation Safety Action Plan (2019) 12 Policy Context: Guiding Principles for IMPLEMENTATION 52 Hall Boulevard 13 North Segment(Locust Street to Highway 99) 53 Themes from Tigard's Goals and Policies 14 Central Segment(A) (Highway 99 to Commercial Street) 54 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS Central Segment(B) (Commercial Street to Omara Street) 54 EXISTING CONDITIONS 16 South Segment(Omara Street to Durham Road) 55 Condition Summary 20 Cost Estimate 56 Hall Boulevard's Functional Classification and Existing Design 22 Prioritization 56 7. APPENDIX APPENDIX 58 77 • . . ,N Y ...; 4; }' ' !: J' 'y.r.-, fir +u. ..�Y'�7, ",:•••;.;• t . '., • �W. i ,'.,4 -_� s• ,....-i. '1 r iy r► 4.. !,1P1-.112., •v im .r,.* .§ 6 .r+�• � i '°� r .r.1'w>-: l';''—:::—.\--)a.‘ �7 . :4114-1 rh 7,;c ,try +r ��J '}• C' .. f�{ �-• ��Yf - >-...-.„—____-_-___;.,. =,.• ,� t. LIMIT 447 "., } > - +A..4� ` i'� „•',,,,,' .:,� J '?r' -±°a _ '•.�. o-'.�t•,,. f +�( �• .• ::b ''s,/..•�' ,• 4,a^f. 5sa'3'a,�„t4 ' !' .r, r c>, 4 f y gyp f; ` 3 �. � " _ % Y,7� ' •it',/" t �T, Fy� _. .� I} 4N' - - •i'1 r'••"'- j ie•• J' , ^ 3'!. `. , a 4,T. rj yy C. +'vq 1✓E^ 1 1 i . .1.11.'::: + ." _ j 11 ... 4 _ i " Yiy ' Tam syr.•' _ — - __— _"'��-�_ ► ' . ..•'4 -14 7°lifilli R�.r�: .f. i��„F• ,yS may„• .,....,„4- =--_ �. —r'-� Y •.,irk - '7 - i- � >; �_,�,,. :11- '' ___„0-07-i•--7"-- §:�w. C �. .. ..c.-.1°-.."-414.• • .'g a $ 41 A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project is engaging with Currently owned and maintained by the Oregon the community to create a plan for an Department of Transportation (ODOT), Hall Boulevard improved Hall Boulevard so that people is a key transportation corridor within the City of of all ages and abilities can walk,ride Tigard. The road provides access and mobility to transit,roll and drive wherever they a broad cross-section of the local and regional need to go.This corridor plan will population and is adjacent to several different and support the City of Tigard's efforts varied land uses. It is a key roadway for several in securing funding needed to make nearby schools, including Metzger, James Templeton improvements and ultimately to take and Durham Elementary, Twality Middle, and Tigard over jurisdictional ownership of the High School. road from the Oregon Department of Transportation. Today, however,the road no longer meets the needs or expectations of a community that has grown around it. Aligned with Tigard's Strategic Vision priorities focusing on increasing walkability, In addition to typical proposed cross sections connectivity, and equity,the Corridor Visioning for each study segment,the following pages Project will support the city's goal of improving and detail recommended improvements for specific ultimately taking over jurisdictional ownership of the intersections, including traffic signal changes, road. curb reconfigurations, and pedestrian crossing The Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project enhancements. provides a high-level concept for a future roadway The cost to rebuild Hall Boulevard as proposed in that safely and comfortably accommodates people this plan is estimated to be approximately$61.1M, or of all ages and abilities, regardless of how they roughly double that of the cost to bring the roadway choose to travel. This corridor plan describes the up to a State of Good Repair. This does not include improvements required to make Hall Boulevard a the soft costs of engineering or design work, nor complete street; such improvements suggest that does it include the costs of moving utilities and Tigard will need to take over jurisdictional ownership acquiring right-of-way. These additional costs can of the road from the Oregon Department of vary but our initial estimates place the total cost Transportation (ODOT). including these expenses at over$100M. The proposed vision is the culmination of an existing conditions analysis, multiple focus groups, and two rounds of public engagement. This plan recommends iflor/ a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard to � r i maintain the two general travel lanes with a center �.P - . LINFI turn lane, and expand the total roadway footprint ;, to include consistent, grade separated walking and 411r� ? o biking facilities, pedestrian-scale lighting, enhanced r bus stops, and tree canopy(right). Proposed typical cross section for Hall Boulevard. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 • 1.W....' , ' ),.--",,,4,,,,..,_. 1,..; 6. , " .,' ' ;.•" ...., .4 ' , --• ... ,. .':T. 4-F.-14`1V;0' f 'r•,f"-r."- c3. ' ' ._ 'r . .10„k'.*,• ,.441'. 4.- 4S.4. ''' .341 -• !'ailp kTet Al," ..i. '.- ' 1..... 0.1 A ,....- . ..41_,%,P,,• „all t_.,yr_ ,,,,,." *120...1; 0.' • 4.0y P -4.i.-. • —r 4, .,.. •- :- ...- li,. ..-•-airv4„•1 tr,.._rp:q' ,r ,''; ft; •.3:11,V ..14 0 dvilirii$....d,.: '._d,V •••• • , '.N.--. I 'I,• \ .1.r t•-1.7.3 ''''','- .41 - ‘ ... P--'t'AI' gA - 1Wialt%... .'••47•.' . ,... -- • \' • .:N,, 41 • — 4._ ..._ . :0• , ' , ''''''4 ile:..... ...." tt.n11111,-" ' .t• ....., lt.''',-..- ,:ilifil:4610. --' P!. / - - .6-, i. .:. ....e,N, .., • • .;- '''i" IFJ • , • ..-tri: —...1 ., .-2tis r ,t'4,010/' ._.•••:p- , , -\c-7",„Arjatr,.. . f'4' % , „, ” '. . :',:71^..!..4bt g'4. I :.-.. ,--- --; • ,•,.4.,.,-",_ ,:••=-.-,5 p•cdt_ ' •4k..' . • SPEED '0 , 1,..t • r -• ..._.. t; T'r, - . ,-.. , LIMIT ..• .. II .1.,. . ' •041 A?. : — , _____•--- -- .r. -1t4 :•- .ii,- L.:. e• . ., . • • _., 30 -,.#4,,,,, cl • 4A P .0.... ..-• r"P' •I'';'I ! ..' ' r d'..." :..... .. , . •- • ___------• . i . ,: .-'- • V• 1.10 • i' : 0. !' i• --' .1 f • li A•-• • • . I 4 F [E NPFHOORTCE 0 . . . : ,_ ,--:,.. 1 . r., , A. ,,,.... .• . r 4 4. • ....' A A •i ' '' II re'' 7: ' 1111 1 lg. 4 .. . _ ''. Wig'''. ii ...... 'j,,f:- .—_- 4°---.'•-MAT --11 -?.. -• : . - .--.... . .1 ' • ..- di—- —•-.1•• MP•- • _ i',1111W4 ---•-• .--..., .--- _,.....„, --- -.1°.°°- -.. _ .,.............._ -1 - .;.•••• ../ ....." .... r.„.....-- -- ...r.--' c., . . '. -,.•-•..1 .-..d..,4,34 IC — . ' , ... f• +1,.....' '• - ',.., • . W 1. ..- - •1 . -... k.1 ,.., . ,. _ t, • . • ' .,....t.. . .. ' Ti • • - . . . . . , i . .., • Z • ..•. .- •.• . • • _• . ' • •:..1-.,'.' ..•• ' • - I , , , • .. I....,,.cw. ..: .. ., • ... _ .. _. ,.,.., . . .. ... .,•44;1; . . , . , • 1 . - ... ._ . ., .. • , . d . . • - ' • i . . -.._ • . .•7.•:, , .. A • , -' . . , 7. 4 ' ..• _ 1 . WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW . WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW ? Purpose Hall Boulevard, also known as OR-141, is a major experience disappearing bike lanes, and bike lanes north-south arterial corridor running through Tigard that do exist are not built to a standard that support and providing connections to the communities of all ages and abilities riding. Beaverton, Portland, Durham, Tualatin, and points beyond. The road sees a diversity of users traveling In recent years, potential opportunities (and on foot, aided by mobility devices, on two wheels, constraints) along segments of the corridor have via public transit, and by personal vehicle to meet been studied extensively as part of planning their daily transportation needs. After decades of for the Southwest Corridor and transit oriented disinvestment,the Hall Boulevard of today impedes development,the Washington Square Regional safe and efficient travel options for Tigard residents, Center Plan update, and the current Downtown particularly those most in need of protection from Reimagined project. automobile traffic. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)- owned and operated Hall Boulevard travels along The Hall Boulevard corridor has a range of frontages,through various land use tremendous potential to connect contexts, and provides critical access to opportunity people to places by linking Tigard's land use goals with its multimodal for some of Tigard's most vulnerable neighborhoods. Although the roadway is currently within ODOT's transportation objectives. jurisdiction, Tigard is working with the State to fund the transfer in ownership of Hall Boulevard to the City. With the City of Tigard as owner and operator of the roadway,the City would have greater control over the physical conditions and design of Hall Boulevard that affect so many of its residents. The intent of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project is to document existing conditions, needs, Conditions along the corridor vary considerably and constraints, and develop conceptual design and for non-motorized users,their ability to safely options and planning level cost estimates the City travel along the corridor is limited by missing and will use to secure funding needed to improve Hall substandard infrastructure. Drivers can get where Boulevard and to create a mechanism to transfer they need to go but experience severely degraded the roadway from ODOT to the City. Realizing the pavement and congestion in a few locations during community's vision for a future Hall Boulevard will peak hours. People walking and rolling face a boost safe transportation choices, improve options patchwork of sidewalks,with existing sections often for healthy and active lifestyles, and increase in poor condition and many sections completely economic prosperity by expanding access to goods, missing. People walking and rolling also have services, education, and employment. few improved roadway crossing opportunities throughout the corridor. Similarly, people riding a bike HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW? 7 Jurisdictional Transfer Tigard and ODOT's Shared Work Plan and Memorandum of Understanding The City of Tigard is committed to redesigning and rebuilding Hall Blvd to a standard of safety and Upon completion of its 2019 Condition Assessment quality that meets the needs of everyday users of the study,the City of Tigard initiated discussions with roadway. Significant funding combined with a transfer ODOT regarding needed repairs and a desire in ownership of the roadway are prerequisites to for future City ownership of the roadway. In late future improvements. 2020,the two agencies signed a Memorandum of Understanding that 1) demonstrates commitment The key to unlocking a transfer of Hall Boulevard to pursue a path forward for jurisdictional transfer is funding. With sufficient funding allocated to of Hall Boulevard, and 2) ensures that each party Hall Boulevard, Tigard would work with ODOT to coordinates investments on the roadway. The develop an Intergovernmental Agreement outlining Memorandum of Understanding provides a shared the terms of a transfer that would be brought to the work plan for each agency to deliver on the two Oregon Transportation Commission who is ultimately stated objectives. responsible for approving transfers of state highways to local jurisdictions. Between 2020 and the drafting of this report in 2023, City of Tigard staff and ODOT staff held The terms of the transfer would ensure that the State regular meetings and work sessions making invests enough money to bring the roadway into significant progress toward stated Memorandum of what is called a "State of Good Repair." This prevents Understanding objectives. Progress to date includes the City of Tigard from being saddled with the costs raising visibility of Hall Boulevard to the community required to update the roadway to a basic standard and decision makers, applying for and securing of quality when taking it over. However,the City of several million dollars in funding for incremental Tigard wants to upgrade Hall Boulevard beyond safety improvements, reducing the posted speed simply repaving the status quo. The corridor visioning limit on a key section of Hall Boulevard from 40mph project identifies what additional improvements to 30mph, completing the additional necessary asset are needed to make Hall Boulevard a corridor that condition study, and Tigard's leading of an effort functions for users of all ages and abilities, promotes to secure state funding through a 2023 legislative safety, connects neighborhoods, and serves as a funding request. catalyst for new development opportunities along the corridor. KE;. For more information on this subject, refer to Metro's Regional Framework for Highway Jurisdictional = - Transfer Study(202 . P TEP Hall Boulevard looking south toward City Hall. Ownership of Hall Boulevard will transfer from ODOT to the City of Tigard. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW? Tigard's Transportation .. System Plan The 2040 Transportation System Plan (TSP)was Tigard pn theMove initiated in 2020 and responds to a new strategic Transportation vision for Tigard's future, which emphasizes System Plan developing a multimodal transportation system that T�AP �►"-a_ _. :��. .�"&,p.-•:� •iii I is walkable, healthy, sustainable, and accessible ,: • for everyone. This TSP serves as an important '' �."�' f long-range planning tool for Tigard to ensure its transportation system can meet community needs, - _ realize the City's strategic vision, and conform to state and regional policies. - . The TSP discusses Hall Boulevard in the • '+� . following ways: FEHR s PEERS • January t02t ► Hall Boulevard will be a key north-south route between neighborhoods within Tigard, providing a critical function for accessing downtown,the Tigard Transit Center,the The Metro Area's Urban Arterial Problem Tigard Triangle, and numerous civic uses, As an ODOT-owned and operated urban arterial,the including the library. With a potential for problems with Hall Boulevard are not unique within jurisdictional transfer of this road,the City the greater Portland metropolitan area. Originally has an interest in enhancing this corridor with constructed to function as rural "farm to market" improved sidewalks and bikeways between routes, roads like Hall Boulevard have seen very SW Omara Street and Pacific Highway(pg 34). limited investment while the cities surrounding them have steadily grown and urbanized. In its December ► There is a need to update the characterization 2020 Regional Framework for Highway Jurisdictional of Hall Boulevard to reflect the jurisdictional Transfer Study, Oregon Metro identified eleven transfer from ODOT to the City of Tigard (pg `promising' state-owned transfer candidate corridors 60). across the region. ► Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard are the Portions of Hall Boulevard are included as one of primary access routes to the downtown area the 11 "promising" state-owned transfer candidate (pg 32). corridors across the region. Unsurprisingly, portions of Hall Boulevard are included among the promising ► The need to reexamine the alignment of transfer candidates scoring high in both a "technical" Scoffins Street/Hunziker Street at Hall and a "readiness for transfer" rubric. In addition to Boulevard (pg 23). identifying candidate roadways for transfer, ODOT ► Pedestrian and bicycle crossing opportunities and Metro's study outlines best practices and the at the intersection of Commercial Street and legal process required to successfully transfer a Hall Boulevard should be improved (pg 33). roadway from the State to a local jurisdiction. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT WHY HALL BOULEVARD AND WHY NOW? 9 r ... lIllillIlli.Pilr/ / /, - '' • . -i•-• - ,:or ', : / .fir � � . ' 1 tr, , „, ?...,....e. :, . . A __ , 0 . I i _ I mo ;tea`.. I 4' I:- • k . 1 it 14* liL" i r it _ .`. _7, 2. Tigard's Complete Street Policy Adopted in 2019, The Complete Streets Policy for the City of Tigard guides its work to create a safe, efficient, and comfortable transportation system for all users, regardless of age or ability. 11111 IIV"— 6 GUIDING PRINCIPLES: • Serve All Users: The City will Support Land Use Planning develop and manage rights-of-way IP Goals:The City will design and to promote access and mobility for develop a transportation network all users,with a particular focus on that supports the land use enhancing the safety of vulnerable goals and policies of the Tigard road users. Comprehensive Plan. 2 Provide Interconnected Networks: 5 Internal and Jurisdictional The City will strive to provide Coordination:The City will a connected network of safe, foster partnerships with local accessible, and convenient travel businesses, developers, community routes for non-motorized travel, organizations, and regional including off-street trails and agencies to develop seamless pathways for bicycling and walkingtransportation facilities and accommodations. 3 Use Best Practices and Innovative, Context-Sensitive Design: The City6 Measure Performance:The City will use current and emerging best will track and report on policy practices in transportation network implementation performance using and facility design to serve the indicators that reflect transportation multimodal transportation needs safety, efficiency, mobility, of all users. It will also use context- accessibility, and experience for sensitive design to address unique all users. local conditions and constraints. The policy applies to all transportation facilities within the public rights-of-way, on public property, and/or within a public access easement. It also applies to the routine planning, design, implementation, operation, and maintenance of all transportation infrastructure. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY • Tigard's Transportation Safety Action Plan (2019) The following intersections were ranked among the The City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action highest priority intersections in Tigard given their Plan (TSAP) documents the findings from a citywide history of crashes and severity: transportation safety analysis that examined crashes involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. The TSAP describes crash trends and patterns, prioritizes locations for safety improvements, and presents Si Highway 99 and Hall potential safety treatments for locations with the mostBoulevard potential to reduce fatal and severe injury crashes in the city, some of which involve Hall Boulevard. The TSAP identifies potential safety improvements and creates an avenue for the City to pursue ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety(ARTS) and other grant # 14 ) Hall Boulevard and funding to enhance transportation safety. Durham Road :;:; Al ]C-mss_. a._ - - ------ - lily:-.--' __ —_______ -in ., ;414_ 2 :1 -01- ill . ___ . _ ____ ?.= . � - - fry - • . ,. ■. � M. �5�. Q7 )� ' . ;""'= - - - _-- , ^= T^ -- c People waiting for the signal to change while walking across Highway 99 at Hall Boulevard. The City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan places this intersection as the highest priority in the city. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT ' DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY Policy Context: Guiding Principles for Hall Boulevard Lf4rig I I ■A■ CITY OF TIGARD STRATEGIC TIGARD CITY COUNCIL PLAN VISION GOALS + ACTIONS Tigard: an equitable community that 2.1 Prioritize carbon responsibility is walkable, healthy, and accessible in the City of Tigard operations, for everyoneprojects, and policies ► 4.1 Identify+secure funding to (Source:City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025) complete the Hall Boulevard jurisdictional transfer ► 4.3 Increase funding to expand connectivity+support an active, healthy, accessible community (Source:City Council Goals 2023-2025) TIGARD'S COMPLETE STREETS VISION Tigard is a vibrant and healthy community where • people of all ages and abilities can travel safely, efficiently and comfortably on a well-connected and optimized multi- modal network of roads,trails, and paths. (Source: Tigard Complete Streets Policy Implementation Plan 2019) HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY 13 Themes from Tigard's Goals and Policies A range of plans already adopted by the City of Several key policy themes emerged from Tigard's Tigard and its partners set an important foundation goals and policies, which served as guiding for the Hall Boulevard Corridor project. This section principles for the corridor visioning project: provides a policy synthesis of five documents that impact transportation system planning and design in 1. Walkable Tigard: a. Safe and comfortable for all ages and abilities ► Tigard Complete Streets Policy Implementation b. Multimodal: encouraging pedestrian and Plan (2019) bicycle travel ► City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan 2. Connected (2019) a. Connecting residents to parks, schools,transit, businesses, and other ► Council Goals (2023-2025) neighborhoods ► City of Tigard Transportation System Plan 3. Equitable (2022) a. Supporting environmental and community health ► City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020 —2025 b. Addressing access disparities for low- income communities and communities ► City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan (2007) of color (See the Appendix for more information) GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE HALL CORRIDOR VISION: • WALKABILITY 0-0 CONNECTEDNESS 0D EQUITY Safety and comfort for people Improving connections for all A key goal for the Hall Boulevard walking or bicycling is an essential transportation system users is Corridor Visioning Project is to component of the Hall Boulevard another critical goal for the corridor ensure that the planning process is Corridor Visioning Project.While visioning project. City policies inclusive and that the transportation creating a multimodal system is a call for providing access to jobs, outcomes serve everyone,especially goal in all City transportation policies, schools,and essential services with those from historically marginalized "walkability"is especially emphasized convenient and affordable travel and underserved communities. in Tigard planning goals.A walkable options.The Strategic Plan aims to City plans often reference this goal transportation system is one that is make parks available to all residents in the context of accessibility and safe and comfortable for people of all within a 10-minute walk. Increased affordable travel options,as well ages and abilities. connectivity supports economic as supporting environmental and vibrancy,which will be essential community health. for the development of the Tigard Triangle,downtown,and Washington Square Regional Center. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT ' DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY A NOTE ON THE REGION'S APPROACH TO SAFETY In the greater Portland region,traffic fatalities and severe injuries are on the rise, and the region is not on track to meet its targets. People walking are more likely to die in crashes than people using other modes of transportation. A majority of traffic deaths occur in a ► The average annual number of fatalities relatively small number of locations, mostly increased from 62 in 2015 to 83 in 2019, along arterial roads. Making these streets an increase of 34 percent. Between 2018 and intersections safer is critical to reducing and 2019,the average number of fatalities crashes in the region. While the vast increased 10 percent from 75 to 83. majority of crashes in the region involve only motorists, bicyclists, motorcyclists, Pedestrian fatalities are increasing more and especially pedestrians are vulnerable than other fatal crashes. Forty percent of travelers who face significantly higher risk of people killed in 2019 were pedestrians, up death when they are involved in crashes. from 35 percent in 2015. In 2018,the Metro Council and Joint Policy ► The average annual number of non- Advisory Committee on Transportation motorized (pedestrians and bicyclists) adopted a target to reach zero traffic deaths fatalities and serious injuries increased from and serious injuries by 2035. The effort 113 in 2015 to 127 in 2019, an increase of to make this goal a reality is called Vision 12 percent. Zero, and it includes implementing proven safety countermeasures such as speed ► Fatality rates per vehicle miles traveled also management, medians, crosswalk visibility increased from 0.6 fatalities per 100 million enhancements, bicycle lanes, sidewalks, vehicle miles traveled in 2015 to 0.8 in and more. 2019, a 33 percent increase. According to Metro's latest safety report,' Not only do the proposed improvements which documented trends on traffic fatalities in the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning and serious injuries between 2015-2019,the Project follow the established design region is not on track for achieving its Vision principles and policies adopted by the Zero goals. City of Tigard, but they align with Metro's approach to traffic safety in the region and aim to reduce traffic deaths of all types. 1 Portland metropolitan area 2019 traffic fatalities and serious injuries annual performance report.Metro. February 2021.https://www.oregonmetro.gov/sites/ default/files/2021/03/04/Metro-safe ty-ann ual- performance-report-2015-2019.pdf HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I DESIGN PRINCIPLES & POLICY • �V-Jv. ti- ;••...:•••••-• t �?Ll +, . : • .-- -� S y� J* � --y .'/".' . - '.'413:,„.-#. +. -- ~ fir p • .a ^S,w• u•- r •" - SCHOOL BUS - - '4 �• ••r. - ` mo i ..•. '= • • • -, - .,. .e. dm,. • ..... ..._....._____. . Fit f� .......„_ L-E*;;;;._ iiiiiiir- -________. _._,.i.r 4k.:7'" '7;iiitt .. ,..:I'm•r.%.. • - ." 'r —UNLAWFUL TO Piss J��o LIsnis FLASH r -IN 111 4- .�-i.1 - j ammay _ , - L11 -r a r l- Blue Bhdboo ,,.4111.1111114' •-. r... t.';'... f M • . T \Ns6, i r .ik‘‘' �: • \ :, . ,t, !IL :, ru.!I��si !' - . s_ 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS Hall Boulevard is an important multimodal MAP 1: Project Extent and Key Areas north-south route in the city that plays a critical role in connecting downtown with residential �1 r_; neighborhoods and future developments in the w rj Hall Boulevard �+�_, Tigard Triangle. It is heavily utilized by many different sL types of travelers,for different trip purposes, along a Washington Square range of frontage and land use contexts' &. (TAK ST ;• ` • I / • / • • • • AFFLE ST ` Ti•. d Triangl • Downtown... H • �,,41P ai • )- Lii 1#t1L J ---_MGDDNNIALD ST - ) — w > _Neighborhoods _ - - , D - 160:J I S..- 1 I • bt RI1Af I ftl} , ' ,,' _5Z.' rI4 .25 6.5 MILES N 1 See the Appendix for more information HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 17 The roadway is classified as an arterial street in the MAP 2: Project Extent and Key Destinations City's TSP. The roadway also intersects with key pieces of Tigard's multiuse path and trail network, such as the Fanno Creek Trail and Cook Park. In . / - addition to serving many walking and biking trips, \ School' Hall Boulevard ' Hall Boulevard is an important transit corridor. t' LOCUST --- 1 Multiple schools are near the roadway, including \ -,s4v OA•K ST Metzger Elementary,West Side Christian High School, Twality Middle School, James Templeton `z --- J Elementary School, Tigard High School and Durham Elementary School, which makes Hall Boulevard ST School i 7.♦PFAFF 'ST important in serving school-related trips. i , H 1 9• Transit,Connections (---.., 1140$ ' — ti t Industry I I o . 4 7 il -' o, AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC ��� H - Fanno Creek Trr ail ► Hall Boulevard (north of McDonald St): 13,500 MGDDNALDST ► Hall Boulevard (between McDonald St and W School Bonita Rd): 17,000 a - . o • oi _1 i , By comparison: •• _• SATTLER ST ► Bonita Rd: 17,500 I ' ► McDonald St: 12,500 School ► Greenburg Rd: 17,500 • 1RwAtW - • i : • ' JiI %� For more traffic count information, see the full existing .Cook Park ; , J@L r '.25 ,-6.5MILES conditions analysis in the appendix. z i • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS The visioning project extent,which extends from MAP , Study Segments Along Project Extent Locust St to Durham Road, contains multiple intersections that play a prominent role in the r-J transportation system, including Locust St, Highway O tij Hall Boulevard 99, Hunziker Street/Scoffins Street, McDonald j LOlid 1 ST ST - Street, Bonita Road, and Durham Road. While each z - ? segment of Hall Boulevard has its own opportunitiesi.iOAK ST f and constraints,the overall roadway can be irk,y2 t / North Segment_; 2 conceptualized into three segments with somewhat ykky similar land use and transportation contexts: North (Locust St to Highway 99), Central (Hwy 99 to \ *AFF LEST Commercial St plus Commercial St to Omara St), and South (Omara St to Durham Road). J HWY 99 1--- / Central Segment(A) •w: . a N, N *Ilk 1 Central Segment(B) , � < J t11 MCDONALD ST - ELI > ._ _ - BONITA RD 1- 0 o _ South Segment Li, nu BATTLER ST _ Q x I ' Ill ' II —' v N. gm IMM DURHAM RD 425 , .O.5MILESo NINI • II JD : HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 19 Condition Summary According to Tigard's 2019 Condition Assessment study,the percentage of assets that need to be The condition assessment found that deferred brought to a State of Good Repair,that can be maintenance and rapidly evolving construction costs quantified, are as follows: have left much of the corridor needing significant work to bring Hall Boulevard to a State of Good Repair. The percentage of assets that need to be brought to a State of Good Repair,that can be 81°"° %quantified, are as follows: 81 percent of roadway pavement, 98 percent of curb ramps, 65 percent of ROADWAY CURB storm drainage facilities, and the Ash Creek Bridge. PAVEMENT (97 AMPS The cost to address these corridor-wide deficiencies A° and bring Hall Boulevard to a State of Good Repair was estimated to be approximately$28.4 million (if constructed in 2020). The assessment contains detailed information for Hall Boulevard on everything ASH CREEK from traffic volumes to stormwater facilities. This 6 5 O/0 BRIDGE report serves as an important foundation for the Hall Boulevard visioning project. STORM DRAINAGE REPLACEMENT FACILITIES NEEDED z 113/1 ODOT recently reached a similar conclusion through its own condition assessment work on Hall Boulevard as documented in a State of Good Repair report. The City of Tigard and ODOT have agreed upon a total State of Good Repair investment need of$30 million for the 3-mile section of Hall Boulevard between SW Locust and SW Durham Streets. Following page, top left:Hall Boulevard at Bonita Road. This intersection is missing key infrastructure like ADA accessible curb ramps, sidewalks, and high-visibility crosswalks. This intersection experiences some of the highest peak hour traffic volumes on the corridor. Middle:Looking south on Hall Boulevard south of McDonald Street. Bottom:vegetation obscures speed limit sign. Right:Hall Boulevard north of Oak St. Lack of sidewalks and safe crossings are common in the northern extent of the project area. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS ..-•.--• - .,: di. ..l. '''! so •••.„, . 4 . ...-. 64 Ara,. . ; .•• ., Li ' .'k i r 0•"...,...,Ili."OH r.t•:t.A....... ... .•,:....,2......,....7i. .. . ,. •••‘ •'Mr i I kle e.4'.Alk.1..*,,...11 11•tollk • .:-% . , :•.2 'Ita:i ''''''' • .li -. ik •.'1.^1*.'....-41 .4......p .... •.•,• ... :....L.,•,,.- -. . :i. .. ..,-;=-. %. .. . .. , - Avitix,.,_./teLawirs-• - - 4. •!- .4 7.-.• • ' •to ...4,...!..._....,.• • -I - ••• - I: . .. .,..45.-.,.,,•_._--,....-,., I. ... •.. r - : .4.1 -,•-Kr4. ..-,c:,.:r: - 1 •....mar i• . --V: - .• • •.•••, ---, ... 'At'•t' . ,. .. ..7'4,! L.•-•,...i.,-.----_••.1---• ...?..• _. i.. . -.-f •. ••••..- •• ,-- .-- •••?: •4 •011 • '!!. •_...-,-•"_.___ .3.J:Li. .. .. -• 4 ,, .,.....,— • 1`•'.., ....,. ... ._ .. __ • ,•., • . • , ,•,- -• • . - • • . - , - • A , .......•L, . .,....:_ . .„ ,,,,03-...0.• ....,... __.,. .. - .-.....:f..11' ..r.. : . : - ......___. ..•-• -• - 4.-...:4; ,..„..•-• •: •.:.•••• ..., _ SCHOOL - . _•.-.-,... ••••• • •.•_...,.::-__• . .. . • '*'-''''' . .• . --• •• ,,, ... SPEED ..._. . -. .,, • . „..., ....... ,• ..„.• _..t. . , . .... .,...4, ..... .,,,.. _ . .,,,.... . ., ‘...-, ..-• .. . .., _.... ,- _ 1 . , -- • 1,.-.: • - .. . . ... . ..... . ... 4EPW•---'---• . ••••• - .-77 '''':• ..1: ..'.• • . ..i--• • 'T •• '.17,••, ,-,.• . • ,,,,./ • . .. . .. kl • ..f.l••- •a •:a • ;'1=::'''.'• ' NIk.ii,s. • 20 • .,..... .:... • . , .. _.... .• • ,. . . ... ,.. .. _. .,, . . N. .. .4..,. . ... ..v. ,..„ ._ ... . . ....., WHEN•.:..-•• . -',. .,c.• -.. -/-:4 - -- • • • . . _ - CHILDREN ,.•4, .7.•;-,., .• ••-•,..• •.:-.,......,••„ .- -.....-7-.•.-7:_••:,:• -•-•.:-i•v• •• „•1!.:•.','•.',;:g.:•.-5'.--..':':•-•••'':' • id''''4' • C 1._•,..".. L. ARE PESENT ..., . . .•••••, •;:.•144r '.e.''''', • ;:;-•i'Z•• '----•:::%t•••'-• ••- • •••: •,.. 'k,•.,...... .!,•-••••;,•• •,...1'... .,•::•7'19:.•-•;.•._:,...„..... • ' ••• • • •e ,-••••4; - •,..34,-r,•:.y--. ,....,4 ,. . ., •..,... ,t• .. :-,, A 4‘.• -1.-'. ,1.1: • .ier. ..r ii•-• -, ,:..i,. . . ... . .• •. .. 4..,........ . . .:::6„. .• ........ - ‘• •••‘' •• :' .•. - •1 ,.. :ii • II . ..... . . . • i.-j' • ...'"....-' • .'•;:7: '-f. ..7••:. •-•-,.., hi• e • ••• ..-. ' ., •-••• .. ' t.$.:-JI, .. .• :i_.,_ 0 I7Wrr L,..,,ri :.• •-•-.. ...L.'.. , , ...— _. ,. ,.-. 1 . •_. ' .•• ' •WiWillt%13'- - - • •••••"• -,....• , ••• • ••.3 • • . .-•• • •2!• " . !' iTt+k.k.i.) • ••••' • •• li.•• ... • ' • .• .._ - M• -.• •• .••41.11111 • .., ••••• . .• „ . . •• ••• ••• • 1•.••r V. • . , -- • ,••..I • . .... :.......• .., _ _ •.. . • ,.. . . .- . ••.• .... ••• •••`'•. ••• •/,•.•"W• .•. ••.. . • " •- , - ..:r-.7• / .., ••••••,= : •'•.''•:•'•'••4•:••f...:i,.., .. -..7-',.;-.4:;•.••:'''s.--',.:V•!-T;:•;•-•',1-;-P-- .,•:---.- ...:;-...„•-•4kar:,, ...._ .,--• ..... . , - ---.- .•.:. ''''';„4.,e-tf•:.... .- ••-•:•;....L-- -...,-.Agi-i...-_,J.f..,--.4..,.. ._ ,....,7 -•.LA"'•'7.',••‘-"'-4'•• .-. -4E '''-•' •"-' ' --.,.... ., - ....•:::`.,: .',•-:.: ',77. T.-•44W:.-. • -. -• . .• •••.- : ,,,,J.. 2z,,,,,-;- --19,..r.14::,,,,,,, .--,••. -_„.....• •... .... ..•*.-.-. * ."- ••'••••••-i.- -...Z•4'.••,r,•-•-•.•ki•-•'':.- • . . -....-.,..3,4 lib, :-.4.4,•,...,..--;,,•,..-f,' ..r..,...7. .,- ,.... -45:„..i..... • ,..•.. .-.A. • .. '-.•;•--•-- , - .• -•• -----*k-'-lipt-•• '•• -- • .• i:-.,....--..-,-.--.4%.0-:•.‘.":-..!•!W•rg,- - . ••••• ' • • •" ' si.'". 6,,--111 '''----•''''-. 4*-•'''t.,' ;=-` -''''•• ..• •Lv"1.,...,,'••, . •-•--' ...„iv.;4_f.:':...1'.-• •:',--,s1A.A.44,1...4.; ...,,'.'*.c.,14"" . L9t.,...-. ... .. _ ..4,.._:„..,...'4;.. ....;-..-4.: - . .. .. •''....\';=-.:-' ---n..4.',-t-P41(7.• ''7'..4,:...:-•-•,-:.• ,. --,,x....!•P 5,7.... -;:i:.774'.-Nks••''•'''.1.'.47--,-•.: .Z.::•-;-.•=itir. ,. -- -. •-..-...''--. '-7••- - •.... -.....;,-. :ii:: :•....1.--•:c.."...• •;....-. -.,- .•. :, ,,...•d.: . - ,..-,, --, • .,.. - - -. - •.:,:.-.••••-•-•,-:-..,-..-ffr •-•:"•.•-:::. • ... •-••• .,- , -. . . - •,.... ••••••_• .•-e• --- - -.•. . :-., • .... . • ..•..- . .. ,.. ,.. •,- IF. ...,...•-;_.-.4"./15,-e. .--..--.:.•..4 -", ..i , 1 ...0k n i .•• 7-:-........`' • fo r t" "411: ••••'-'..i... • ... . !' -' .....-.:.-:6?..olit 14.':.•(-!--7-L:7 / ‘-"-•'• . %-Y-F-•.:','-- .' .-'..•-,..,..r':7 , ...:4 .,.• -.& :LI-•:--.cll.- .41-. r„ - 1. -V !. ••!. • "- gl':`''' - •' .-4'....... .......L.. c..-.. . • ch Oti, •_..:.. . . F.,:,_:...,-. -:-..--.7.: •• • / 0, 4• • • • r •,•-•.:.. .'-- -7-4•7-.';-,-;r---.,'-r- .---- • .• -'.. '. - .. -e- . '' '...e-r• :.`•''- : - -'-'-'--r.. . .-...••••, ... . •. • ... . .• • ., .. ..,...,.., --, •-• •-• -a... • 'l iiii j LN 4 . ..., ... . . .._.,. .. ,.. ,-7______ ...j. _. •-• 1.-• 17.4,.• ,. • . a (6411.40 i 4 . ••-•:- ..!„.-'•./SPE r ' ". '454-111.- ; " . ' ••••.,_,. --1:t. -'''..s!..-•••••: ,tie i--' *-..'t.r l'4-if ....- -- ..•.., • -....,. .,,...L. .. ,:i•.' 7.- • -'le- .:'-::' 17 -Nti".7,..1.-`•:.--- . . ..._.-....-- .., ;,./. . ,..-:. . -':-..!••th,„ ••••••.,i•-;-0;;,....A.v...g.. -... . .•• ..-ria-r --. .-: .- ---- ..•••••'-4-..-.701-W-'-...;..--:• • -.• • •..-.----__ •---.- tatioi al •..,.'.... .-•-•...-Te' 7-!..--,!!--. -' .- *. ' N-....- . r;.-.,.,%•-?--:. ".-:.4.......• .okZei. - .'j-,..3...--.,..'"'.-• :ed- ...,4.r.- - ..,- •...---..-..-•• ...- -' "••-:.- *•,...41,- ... . ., .. .4 .- ::5-....tr . • _ ,• --- ,.-- . .,-•„..- e -,t... . ..*1/47 . ' .. ''. PAi•ot;,. _ . . . -..,P- - .6- 11,1/1 . _ 014 .-.. .-- 11 .. -O -- - - • • -.... • • s - -'kjt,..01' • . - — • .;' - , :or . • N• • - ..: ,s,i• ...,..-0,••.,• : .,..-.•-_-,,,,s. •,,, ..., . , - , tic., Tit., , . _ __... -0,.. _7 .• '44*:•! -•'-f•.-.& •• • ':•*•-?".:',:•;..2'.....:;:71•..-',le; •4741'(.7,.:•• • ' . '..ek'!".-.ri • , - "- •• .t.I .• •• - t Or•,•:- 1./Q -.•:-'• -'•::••• 19.. ,-2=4;-• t ;71 i ' 1 - ''''.- •.• •-•.-'••••-•- 'e'' • ..Pf' . - ' •• •/•••• 4.J• .4' r- ",:•,•.:•.•. •22•••• :',,,,-•-,"7-,•-../P•14-• -"• ,..:‘;s','\''.*-I-'.r. •' -it.. ..,,.-._': •• -.7:-,:.-- •-_..'!.,..!.:•:!--_-....: •-••••-,''...0 . -' ' '111•••-• wt.:..--'4 ..t.. •• - — •g• •- •.1%...A ..,:i•;;;_....,:;7F-pz-•-."•:::.f.ir.:..:..•-•.c...,,i--4Z.:•-••.• • •--RI' 2.',." i-'- - -•:-.-..----4....!1' isbi• . — -..::- ! • ...7 ..."'-. - 4 - , f fr ::_l'',.-• • „Ambit,. Ir•••••-•"•: •. ........1111':..:" .r .,,,,....;;?. .:.... - ,plyive • -.-• -';••••:..'z'.-..,.....-•.' .` '' 74r.4.5•'%;•-x''';ii---4,1r--' •"' '• HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT ' EXISTING CONDITIONS 21 Hall Boulevard's Functional Classification and Existing Design Hall Boulevard is classified as an arterial by the TSP. Arterials are designed for higher volumes, but tend not to be major regional travel ways. The TSP describes a multimodal transportation system as one that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone. Instead of solely designing . 4 • for cars,the focus has shifted to strengthening 1 connections, access, and opportunities for all residents with a strong emphasis on equity, safety, A typical existing cross section of Hall Boulevard in the northern segment, from Locust Street to Highway 99. and multimodal accommodation, particularly for walking and bicycling modes. These updates, recommended by the TSP, are reflected in the proposed improvements in the next section. Hall Boulevard is currently built with outdated design standards,with infrastructure that varies from . 6-- 1 _ 111 segment to segment(see right). At the time of writing, ' MIIMERMIII.M. the City of Tigard is updating its engineering design 1 A typical existing cross section of Hall Boulevard in the standards for consistency with the city's development central segment, from Highway 99 to Commercial Street. code and TSP. Existing Roadway Facilities ► Designed for 45 mile per hour speeds ► 11'-13' wide travel lanes 111 .n ► 14' parking lanes , —1111MMENE111.11. ' A typical existing cross section of Hall Boulevard in the Existing Bikeway Facilities central segment, from Commercial Street to Omara Street. ► 4-6' wide, intermittent bike lanes - Existing Pedestrian Facilities ► 5-10' wide, intermittent sidewalks A typical existing cross section of Hall Boulevard in the south segment, from Omara Street to Durham Road. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS CONSTRAINTS Improvements are needed for The following constraints were identified in the Hall Boulevard to meet arterial existing conditions analysis. The memorandum in standards. Hall Boulevard has the the Appendix provides maps and more detailed potential to be a premier active information related to this analysis. transportation corridor within the city's existing and planned ► Hall Boulevard lacks complete infrastructure for networks. - Hall Boulevard all users. Gaps remain in the sidewalk network, Corridor Visioning Project Existing both in terms of missing segments and the Conditions Memorandum provision of ADA accessible curb ramps. Most existing sidewalks are 6ft wide and do not have a landscaping strip separating the walkway from traffic, which reduces the level of comfort for people walking. More recently installed sidewalks, such as those between ,; . -;;lielrer'.. + � Langtree Street and Ashford Street, are 8 ft trh:,' wide and are more comfortable. Sidewalks on seilth ' ;''•=a�` t '•'_ ? .. ...,:k• the east side of Hall Boulevard between Ross :' :riV: - :,r'' ,.••1;;4..; Street and Murdock Street have landscaping � ' ';' j W strip separation but abruptly end before ,`S ',hK '# " .•.; reaching the bus stop to the north. 1. ► Improving sidewalk connections (and „.. �_4 : '''' . .1.t.-.---• � expanding the roadway footprint generally) �I - . -� ' `_ I may be more costly in areas with significant •+ 1 mi _ r, grade differences, such as the ditch north of - �_ Sattler Street on the west side, and the low- _ • :�f., . - _ -:.-..•: . ^:1,iii.,;:..- • ..; _ lying areas around the Hall Boulevard/Bonita ; r •_ Road intersection.:` _ ;y 4. ' - $'fiea- ?.• k , r r•�.; F A ate _ -_, =,� ► Despite serving the frequent service Route 76, . some bus stops along Hall Boulevard remain inaccessible to all users. These stops include f .� _ ; 1':tl-�; -- , w the intersections of Murdock Street and v - '�; . t, '' : _ i .fir <" McDonald Street(northbound). - - , . ► With the exception of the Fanno Creek Trail The roadway footprint expands dramatically south of Crossing and the rectangular rapid flashing Bonita Road. However, the sidewalks connections end beacon (RRFB)just north of Highway 99,the before reaching the intersection(looking south). HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 23 only marked crosswalks exist at signalized ► In addition to the more detailed constraints intersections. The distances between these above,the visioning project will need to crosswalks range from roughly 900 ft(Wall account for the following factors that add Street to the Fanno Creek Trail crossing)to complexity to Hall Boulevard: well over a half mile (north of Highway 99). The lack of crossings for people walking and biking • The combined role that McDonald Street, limits the east-west connectivity of these Hall Boulevard, and Bonita Road have in networks at Hall Boulevard. east/westbound traffic. ► A few intersections that already have marked • The sensitive environmental context around crosswalks with signals have documented Fanno Creek. concerns regarding safety. These include the Fanno Creek Trail, Highway 99, and Durham • The railway crossing between Burnham Road. Street and Commercial Street. ► Hall Boulevard has complete bike lanes • The offset skew of the Hunziker Street along the project extent, but these lanes are Scoffins Street Hall Boulevard intersection. insufficient except for the strongest and most • The inter-jurisdictional nature of Highway fearless of riders. The bike lanes range from 99/Hall Boulevard and the Highway 217 4-6 ft, buses mix with bike lanes at all stops, Crossing. In these locations,the Hall and there are three notable floating bike lanes Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project will that cross right turn pockets:the northbound likely need to focus less on design specifics approach of Hall Boulevard/Bonita Road, and more on recommendations for ODOT. the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/ Knoll Drive,the southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Burnham Street, and the • northbound/southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Hwy 99. Each of these conditions .,..`Tw: ���� ; . contribute to a less comfortable environment - � :. � for people biking. •»��:;- , �� � . .tz • -:�•.-. ► Available right-of-way appears to be most = = �. ;- =. ¢: :. w-.r ;:,.. .,:.�.F. constrained in the Central segment, between Highway 99 and the Fanno Creek Trail. ° -': Proposed bikeway facility types may need to its \,. F be different in this segment than the North and South segments. Tradeoffs will be difficult here :�` 111111 /1Xi� V` without expanding the available right-of-way �11 �. .: because the downtown area is a critical area 11A.MS%‘ for transportation connections and should have some of the most robust facilities for all users. A storm water grate at the base of a curb ramp, located at the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Spruce Street. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS OPPORTUNITIES the ongoing Downtown Reimagined project presents an opportunity to improve the The following opportunities were identified in the community's perception of downtown in terms existing conditions analysis. The memorandum in of accessibility. the Appendix provides maps and more detailed information related to this analysis. ► Completing sidewalks on both sides of Hall Boulevard is a significant opportunity for the ► That Hall Boulevard connects parts of the city city's pedestrian network, which designates with distinct land use contexts is a strength of Hall Boulevard as a major pedestrian corridor. the corridor. Increasing multimodal connectivity ► Inter neighborhood biking and walking between residential areas and commercial trips: Along Hall Boulevard,there are many districts would greatly improve the corridor's neighborhood cut through paths, which ability to serve different trip types and users as increase the east-west connectivity for people well as fulfill City goals. Hall Boulevard has the walking and biking. These paths could serve potential to connect people to parks, schools, as natural locations for mid block crossings the Tigard Public Library, City Hall,the WES between signalized intersections. Transit stops commuter rail,the future Southwest Corridor could be relocated to align with these paths. light rail, Washington Square, and the Tigard Triangle. ► Other potential crosswalk improvements that emerged from the existing conditions analysis ► The Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project include the north leg of McDonald Street/Hall is highly relevant to the interests of downtown Boulevard and the north leg of Omara Street/ Tigard. Collaborating and coordinating with Hall Boulevard. ' -. '3 n','fist;pis' , f . SFr . . k B wry • •�.'r lr- - �="r'f b•... - 4, r;.. , w. F , 'z.� � ter- 'e j_ �. .. 41,-•_, ,,,, • -, . , •Takr,74,04. ..e.,, 4:s- . , - # - a'(1 The Woodruff Bridge offers a unique connection from Hall Boulevard to the southern portions of the Fanno Creek Trail. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 25 ► Traffic operational improvements including ► Several right turn pockets could be realignment of the Hunziker/Scoffins reevaluated as part of the Hall Boulevard intersection and operational improvements at Corridor Visioning Project. These include major intersections such as Durham Rd, Bonita the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/ Rd, and McDonald St. Bonita Road,the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Knoll Drive, and the northbound/ ► For the Fanno Creek Trail Crossing,there are southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Hwy multiple opportunities to improve the safety 99. The most likely of these to be eliminated for people walking and biking. One or more would be at Hall Boulevard/Knoll Drive. RRFBs may be more effective than the existing pedestrian hybrid beacon. Depending on ► The most constrained area is the central the bikeway design, curb extensions may be segment between the Fanno Creek Trail possible to reduce the crossing distance for Crossing and Highway 99. Expanding right-of- pedestrians. There may also be space for a way between Burnham Street and the railroad refuge island. may best come from the City's public works property. ► The future bikeway along Hall Boulevard has the potential to create safe connections to ► There is a significant amount of space on the other major links in the bicycle network. First, Highway 217 bridge that could be repurposed the future Fanno Creek Trail extension on the for more protected biking and walking facilities. southeast corner of Hall Boulevard/Durham ► The intersection of Highway 99 and Hall Road will need to be accommodated in the Boulevard is a key intersection in Tigard and is visioning plan. Durham Road, Sattler Street, currently challenging to navigate while walking Bonita Road, McDonald Street, Commercial Street, Hunziker Street, Oak Street, and and biking, and could benefit from improved facilities. Locust Street are all designated major street bikeways. Bike turn boxes and advanced queuing facilities should be considered at these intersections to help people riding bikes make turns to and from those corridors. ► The section of Hall Boulevard between Langtree Street and Ashford Street is particularly wide. If the rest of the corridor isn't widened to match this width,then the extra space here could be repurposed into a more highly protected bikeway, stormwater catchment basin, or both. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS This page intentionally left blank. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I EXISTING CONDITIONS 27 L , ,. • \ 1 -�, t.. K 1 ..*. .• . ji._. r yr ) . „it ,... , , I, 1 r `p• a.1.$' b .,,� • 2 — • • . • ,A.' �,'„ �K :`;-ate' ,' a 'f `i l 4 `�L s� :'i` 1-....„ tits 2.; V I • v G/ ,3/41$. I r ..c _ ..• . `r•_, .' '_'_ _h� . .5( ,,i-- SS 1. k. ,, ‘ _ ,-i , 1._ „No\Iit.. .-. , . I: % \11 Arr t, \\I --- -.••• \c\°'\ ...... _.ae^."""',"/2 ....„ f ��:4L ‘' '.,\.- ) '‘'''' E,,hat,.Pew, r\�- ` ! f� �r \L ( ( ; .• lv I n I �/ I;bvwv� vier/ \ 7 N. / --/ - •� ���; �j. � Y ��t 4. *Monthly check-ins and project updates with PLANNING PROCESS the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee were held throughout the process. r..6%) 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS In the summer of 2022,the project team began the corridor visioning project with a comprehensive existing conditions analysis.*This involved inspecting the roadway,compiling past plan recommendations,research,and data analysis.The findings are summarized in the next section,and the full report can be found in the appendix of this document. 2. STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS •:":to In the fall of the same year,the project team conducted a series of virtual stakeholder meetings to • develop a more robust understanding of the issues and experiences people have while traveling 11111010 • along Hall Boulevard.The first meeting engaged leaders from each of the schools within a quarter • mile of the corridor and discussed how Hall either facilitates or hinders school-based travel. • The second meeting brought multiple government agencies to the table to identify the ways in • which Hall Boulevard impacts the delivery of their services.The third meeting brought together • community members who are involved in various advisory committees or non-profit organizations • with interests in the corridor.The findings from these meetings were incorporated into the existing • conditions report. Finally,the project team additional outreach at the El Tigre Festival in October • to alert people of the upcoming open house. • • 3. OPEN HOUSE 1 AND ONLINE PUBLIC INPUT MAP • The first public open house for the corridor visioning project was held the evening of November 16,2022.The purpose of the open house was to share findings from the existing conditions analysis and to hear directly from community members about their experiences traveling along Hall Boulevard.The public was also invited to provide comments on an online mapping tool that was open for two weeks after the open house,to allow for input from people who were not able to attend the meeting.The mapping tool allowed users to submit general comments about the project and draw points and lines on the map relating to destinations and the barriers they face. This feedback served as a complement to the more data-driven existing conditions analysis and was used to improve the project team's understanding of the corridor. • : 4. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT • During the winter months of 2022-2023,the project team used feedback from the first open • -V% •• house to develop various concepts for Hall Boulevard.The team compiled various roadway configurations that could be implemented at varying degrees of impact to the public right-of-way. The team developed these concepts while also balancing other factors,such as emphasizing bikeway connections to key amenities along the corridor,strategic spacing of pedestrian crossings,and considering where vehicle congestion occurs along the corridor.This process resulted in an aspirational cross section for Hall Boulevard along four key segments of its extent. These cross sections,in addition to single-location improvement recommendations,were referred to as the proposed concepts. • 5. OPEN HOUSE 2 AND PUBLIC INPUT MAP • In the spring of 2023,the project team hosted an in-person open house at the Tigard Town Hall to gather feedback on the proposed concepts.Like the fall open house,the spring open house also included an online input map that participants could submit comments on for up to two weeks. This feedback was used to refine the concepts further and modify some of • the recommendations. 6. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT:CONCEPT DESIGN REPORT HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I PLANNING PROCESS 29 Key Takeaways from Public Engagement Efforts The following themes emerged from the individual stories, ideas, and recommendations we received What We Heard throughout our stakeholder interviews, open houses, and public outreach: "I drive south on Hall to the library, usually accompanied by small kids. If there were ► There are limited crossing opportunities, a more protected bike lane, we could bike especially near bus stops. there." — Participant comment from Open House#1 ► Visibility issues — lighting needs improvement, especially for people who ride transit. "Contiguous sidewalks from Durham to downtown are crucial. We live in 79th/ ► There are multiple sidewalk gaps, which makes Ashford neighborhood with kids and it hard for families to access the library, parks, pets and walking up Hall toward the city and schools. and library or south toward the parks is difficult and dangerous (Fanno Creek Trail ► People drive too fast, especially a concern for from Bonita is not always reliable or lit students walking and biking to school. and doesn't always feel safe. STRONGLY support sidewalks, more lighting, brush ► The current bicycle facilities do not provide enforcement and perhaps a couple more enough separation from traffic. lit crosswalks on South Hall."— Participant ► The Fanno Creek Bridge is too narrow to comment from Open House#2 accommodate all modes. "[In regard to the proposed protected ► Highway 99 and Hall Boulevard is a intersection at Locust St]This is a route challenging intersection to navigate while to an elementary school, so a protected walking and biking. intersection here will make children a lot safer." — Participant comment from ► Much of the congestion on Hall Boulevard Open House#2 between Bonita Road and McDonald Street can be attributed to people traveling east- "NB Hall to WB McDonald regularly backs west along these roads, as there isn't a similar up in the center median to the church, sometimes almost near Bonita. Lengthen alternative in this direction. the signal please! SB Hall and WB/EB McDonald here never really back up that badly,they can wait an extra 30 seconds to clear the turn pocket." — Participant comment from Open House#2 • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS . . Y SWAMI .Holm.rrs;ri- i Q 4 Thank you L*1• ..,.at participating! A 4 n- • 0 The aislrngcondrronsmmnknrpeiddre Q now over However•rrlere wile be more ❑ • - fpoaees ro comeenrs m future pha mases of he Heusaurt�adca as msianing aroy•cl. Legend r,i r.... a eN earths r. For more information... t ci Daetlnatkna visit fie protect website by alleging kers, MIST!no ❑ , 0 eys�. 4 ❑ • - - .. Project Corridor 5W9nwaP �I .. esead Bike lane s • s ttaih 8 -. . , tow i .ssawsi is 1r Above:the online mapping tool from the first round of public engagement. The first open house asked participants to provide comments on the destinations they travel to along Hall Boulevard and the barriers they face. This feedback helped support the existing conditions analysis. dauE CROIECCW015IIE SW n Malmo Ras D' I CI How to comment "" ,e rd Ra m We want heel' thoughts on lie proposed Sw s .•i .- 3. �l i 1 1r improremems Ice Hall Baule'rard!These Improvements are intended m address concerns we I N : (=l.— • 1•••:, heard in fie fir5l open house regarding access, ,ry n..,...i..�.P.. �' I y connectivity.safety.and mobility for people walking, • j ary • swwem.,n SA bikinq•taking transit,or driving along the corridor. 5 • - shyr°jh� l:' I - You can browse the map inane of two ways: "' - ±rvw>a H" • .. — s i 6 r Legend r 13 #k € IA pick Shemarkers mills Milt to loam more about ' :•.: ..,i•••.•.. .....,., ,i ..,I n.,,....;.: • the facilities,and vote and comment. ' 0 ear Stops y� . .. — 1 [e nnw•, . al.r Pacmu lg,aaan 'F © ' ?_ • l Bi Seler i an inrmorocrion Prom the table Below. / �' geroresxd Iwereeer . 'let Leced•n lrnprevern et type I ki Traffic Signal rdx. stemma!or Hwy 99 xeconnaw'anon tr rnAanrM cre[Slna 01111.1.11Ti •-c nn.o. RpmrsI CI aleytle-Pe0w,lrlaneallrctCrcrsdng a'6 ^�l 7 . Knoll CO Re[oringuallon 1 '•• l ncc.0 uan.p.manr Locust SI Prrretttd IrinssICllon Toioal Cross-Section Along This Extent ..w v,.•,0.v. ,��� WWI55 C,nrurwl Imaraw^.Itip si rt-of.Way Conslrllntc ,yis & — 4 n,Id.dPr>Kct 1 y W ax.a., enemtohome rinrshed — Field , ; g .. sural .1 • .. ,Iiii mib st •ii[ ... :aai.se.+i Above:the online mapping tool from the second round of public engagement. The second open house asked participants to respond to the proposed improvements and design concepts for the corridor. This feedback helped to refine the proposed improvements and design concepts. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I PLANNING PROCESS 31 • 1 III ..., . ...— . . . ..••• . •-2 •'' 4i.-:-' '•' - ..r ;' , . _.., ,., • ‘ - ' vp. .'", .", .•, . ,4 '' •; ‘-'" -.''' :!.r4,-; '4-, %.',;:trq'z4.'...- '111 i-;. ..,..,. -; •-,:..LL - -"Y'.?$;-„ - " lift '4 .,&_,.. ...01,,, j'Aai_.,'.' ,ik f",_.:,..-1-• -0.-, .: v,:•• •... . •_ - 7 :. •' . - '• ,' ' .''' ...,:..i....-,4Z;• •• ..,t-',11.,.- oi-•:=„,_ _..., .h...,.i- '-', ',• ,,: --.-iw: . 4 • 4.'''''' 4 p,A._ ,,F, _ .f '•,.- • '.....-4.;...' . ... -"• ,'•,,:- ,;- re,cktii..; -...or '...' ' -' ...`s 'L-• ,- -,.... gr= ,il -..).';0.1.re44.41.i/- 4.:' d--;."--',•-4.--.. 4 ''11." d Ill'.'i 4.. 17111:i.:.";1 Alf?%.41#.„Ai:-PIV.;•;715:,..-.'..-, d'''' P ' '-Ar ,. .. v., • -..ft„-.,4,,, : . . ,It ,.L.4„i 1,,,,",!,-,,,itr. , - . , , ,,,, 4%, ,;- 4 ', .i ....ill •Lc •'• 1" •, ,.....,....1.,.......".Nrii_-,,,,...r.,3,....4•• '.....b' :,.....";.,..,...1..d..,-,....ro i•:::'. d ....,4 i XI,rd?"0....Art:. 1...• ,ed , ; *1....C, .''''t'..; . :1 ,'..,:,' .Z'.•'2.- 40:4."lir' .'r'' . ' •••;-=a. _-1-_ •-- ' ". ' - •. . '' , '•;,.:4:k... • •@- • L„L._ ,_; , ,. ..„-,,..7"k i-Pt, •-'4;.::,...r.',1:-." ....- . .•"- ' - '• ,.. .. .. , •. ,.:, , .. .• .;. . .. , 1: 1:1:A-.• ,,•-• .': ' '• - li;•,__L.41••••- - ,... 7-".: _ ...-4-...;-1,-"'-.44--,- . • • • , - , ''vt: .'- - . T .. „........—.. __, .6 , .. ''' 4,...-• ,:. -• •-L'1'''•-•. - " .. .," _ " '0491't ' ''‘,0. -•••''r 41:-; -4t4- ' - • • AtriE4p..- ,....,sly.r-, ."...:•-•„-_, s, ,..: • A r',P.O.; ... :- :. . Ill _ , ,A. , * .r.-' 4- - • •• L' : :'4101,ikd....'' ' ,.. :d' i'L-.711111,' ,;., . .1.' •-.40..,.''.46...• 3,',.. .1._ 'rr-cf- °# 7:.•:.•. . 4 ... , . -. , ,, • ' •2•':.•--e;-,:lt LL;-;41,‘ '' . ' -- ',/,' ,i"..bir'' ...-.- '' '•:•• . • • '•4 '14- i te . -,:•*,dt- :4'". -, ' -...11•5.'• '- ,LI . • •..• '' it' ••• L. .: t 4 • . ,....e .-*'•"'.... All.:+. .r' . ...'''•4.... ...". ,4 _ , '''''''•.7. :.., • . '. • :.' ' -:;•1.)ii,.::‘'.,,:.'4", _ ,., , ' _ - --, -,-.:'...';''''....:%A.,-;'-': .-..4r- • , ......,;;. ..u...•••',-'-i.::••,,, .44r,, :4;•••':‘ . .-e L-it,,L ... -, -.,.....;,,,... ...,,i‘op .:,... .. ., -- ---, ,N, _iff.,--..:,:r4,.,:-4t, , .„•,-.. . ,. . --...,--.,:-.. riA_:,c,4f..,-.--L-,4-: r.. ' '46.• . 4.114"LI ,i_NPL '.'-: '':-., 4--:;4; L:.r'''''.4‘!44,4,.!:1'.,"_ :, . , • -4.,„p' -47-.•c,y,,,; •.,.,•tv::4,.,,,!•:_-.10....4.,, • ...7.-..,y•-•• , -- t 'I. - - _-, .., L ,i.,..-L d -'\I'd 4•- - .-it. • . --•.' -.t4• .W.' • • ,---..' .-- '',:,••••7.., -•:!:3"_ -,. •••! , •--. -' • : , F..4v-.. , ._ • .:: , -'L.:':.•''.: it.''..,'';',...4,' ';'.L.. ' '• flr'4...:'.'n -.d...,_, , '-d: '• ''.5i,iP., ,-4' . ,', ' . •. ..,.,F; ..'r''''A,,• .1.,..4.......,,,, ,....'1.1-.-r • iF.41A.i' .. ' .... . ' . '..i.'-', •*-7-s.r.:4:';'•1 *. ' L',7 '-•-• . ' .,• N i •-• . 7":1_-,1 ,'' _ .. -1.: . ."i • - - - -__A.-_,,.., '' - • - • .— -4 :._ . — .,._., • , ... . ...I.; . _., ^---+.-x3--- -' •,-..=-...4`4, , r._ -,0,4•-• - ." '•-'....,.._,. -.-.',S .. - ..... .._ ., ..: '.1*....',%:' _ - , "L•';'_• -_ - _'-.,• -.'1.,-;*';'.;-...:4-71tL• ,_,Ya.---.'4arie -• —qv,,.. %-.• f ' I -• ..-...-„,, - _ 01..A. --• - 44 1 • -,- L." -' • • ' ' '' - ' ••,1 -•-1„ .. . -• • - '7••\‘ ! .... _ _......_.,-, -.,.....1,,. ,....___ .;_,•..... --_-4,-.,?-7.--44-- A. _ . .._ . ,. __ _,......,„.........,. ...,.r.„..,:. ....__...., , ,, ,... ._ ,..,:_i„... .....,..„ • . . _ __,_ .... .. _ ,• ..., • .._ , ___....... / ..„ ..,..... . ....., ,,. „ _. . . . ,...... _... .., . .... d• ' ''•,.f: ".: .” '.' A • '1.4''''il! d :I. .. " • .-- • .--.--- - d L•. ' •-.--. '': X,,..' _ • ? • t.:Jo,,-_, • '''--'5...- ,4/...„/-'......- • , i "- ••r•-,.,-:.,..-&-r;/4 ''•:---...1,••• •.. L' •-'1-0,- .' ., •••; .'.• • - • „ • • .. - „,,, -'•-• .;er.14,"ri.L'-V--.."-- ' '"'•1.4",,a7_,?jk 4fivZ•.‘f.„4:4i'.1.1.•,•*,,Aiptf...,41.-..' •,...q... ,^.. - - '', 'V - -4.'.:11,• '‘A•••• c:,. '1.4,. - ---.. -•,.• --.” -14'.... .,-4.4.--.Y.'0'4 Le, -. .4.14t.F,:rv,i,',.-.:,,4,1,•'F',,,,,,,„ '''':''' -‘•'-'':L'•:•••-":.;.p'-;,:t :..'4A,_ ' '.. '.... 44., :4,),,:sta-r'-,..,--,-,.,--;:'-,•-.:., , ,,. -...., -,-, ,:.f-t),:.••, .,-,. '4:4440-eti4-0,lag4ta,---- -,r.:::: :'2....4.:ti.:- -\--,-:,A,,..,,.,.z..:::,'•;,_ -,,,••.:,- ;4,!' f.'v'4-....-• ..› - '1.•'''- ',1,''.'..".•':!.•_.:,'-.0-,,;,.'.,:_i:I.:_. .-.,-.•'.,...-. .,,,. ...,:*,-..N.... 5. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS From Plan to Project: Throughline from recognized best practices2 in transportation planning the TSP and will advance the City's stated goals and policies. As noted in the City's TSP, "Transportation planning The recommendations assume that the roadway in Tigard is shaped by both opportunities and footprint will need to be expanded in order to constraints. Projected growth over the next 20 accommodate all modes, and in places where right- years, both in Tigard and throughout the region, will of-way acquisition is not possible, will deviate from increase travel demand and associated congestion, the typical cross section. The recommendations but increasing roadway capacity is unlikely to solve also assume that they will be completed in phases in these problems. coordination with ODOT funding per the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement(IGA). Tigard's Strategic Vision emphasizes developing a multimodal transportation system that is accessible, walkable, and healthy for everyone. To achieve High-Level Concept Shaped by City this vision,the focus has shifted to strengthening Values and Public Input connections, access, and opportunities for all The proposed vision for a typical cross section residents with a strong emphasis on equity, safety, along Hall Boulevard is to maintain the two general and multimodal accommodation, particularly for travel lanes with a center turn lane, and expand the walking,transit, and bicycling. total roadway footprint to include consistent, grade separated walking and biking facilities, pedestrian- This shift recognizes that our streets play host to scale lighting, enhanced bus stops, and tree canopy more than just cars. We can do this by reviewing (see rendering on following page). speed limits; completing the system for walking and bicycling; and making the most of 2-3 lane Within each study segment,this cross section will cross sections where planned five-lane sections vary slightly,with the north segment being the most would drastically increase costs while negatively constrained spatially, and the central segments impacting neighborhoods and conditions for active building in additional features to connect key transportation."' destinations in those areas. In addition to typical proposed cross sections for each study segment,the A New Vision for Hall Boulevard following pages detail recommended improvements for specific intersections, including traffic signal The following recommendations integrate the changes, curb reconfigurations, and crossing information gathered by the project team through enhancements. Detailed descriptions of each our existing conditions analysis, which were improvement can be found in the recommendations refined through public input. They reflect nationally table at the end of the chapter. 1 Tigard On the Move:City of Tigard Transportation 2 Guidelines for Designing Livable Steets and Trails. System Plan. Chapter 4 Modal Plans. Pg 23.2022. Metro 2020. https://wwworegonmetro.gov/tools-partners/ guides-and-tools/guidelines-designing-livable-streets-and- trails HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 33 A NEW VISION FOR HALL BOULEVARD cr. Sidewalk BiFa Trees•5: Common Lane Two Way Left Tum Common Lane_ treesBM Sidexalk 62„ 4.5h Sls Sfl 4n I"-"' Ift 128 1 ft s 4N 6N R• '. t w • r 11• .44 • Above: The proposed vision for a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard is to maintain the two general travel lanes with a center turn lane, and expand the total roadway footprint to include consistent,grade separated walking and biking facilities, pedestrian-scale lighting, enhanced bus stops and tree canopy ► Consistent: Each segment will feature two ► During detailed design and engineering phases, travel lanes with a center turn lane study alternative intersection treatments such as roundabouts at all signalized intersections to prioritize safety and traffic flow for all modes. ► Multimodal: Continuous biking and walking facilities, improved transit stops, enhanced ► The vision assumes that the roadway footprint will crossings need to be expanded in order to accommodate all modes, and in places where right-of-way acquisition is not possible, deviate from the typical cross section. ► Environmentally sound: Street trees and stormwater infrastructure throughout ► The recommendations also assume that they will be completed in phases in coordination with ODOT funding per the terms of the memorandum of understanding. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The recommendations in this chapter are organized r into four study segments, due to the need to break the central segment into two parts. The north L: Hall Boulevard ■ segment is from Locust Street to Highway 99. The LO ST sr n `- - first central segment, Central A, is from Highway 99 co Z I to Commercial Street. The second central segment is 11/ OAK ST f t from Commercial Street to Omara Street. The fourth cD 6,41, North Segment-; study segment is the South segment,from Omara 4,4, Street to Durham Road. APPLEBY I The proposed improvements along these extents have slight variations due to their land use context, Iavailable right-of-way, location of utilities, and HWY 99 ✓ proximity to key destinations. r Central Segment(A) �' General Recommendations 44 '• . Q Maximize tree canopy to the extent possible.This includes zplanting in the center median when the center turn lane is L.L, ( not needed. / N It .• Ce�ral Segment(B) ,r ) . 11„„. \ f . . Utilize permeable pavements where possible. J • \ Maximize pedestrian-scale lighting along the corridor and prioritize bus stops. MCDONALD ST i , k _ Identify locations for stormwater treatment facilities and a __ allocate sufficient funding to their design. T BONITA RD I. o An enhanced crossing facility would use high-visibility • I I South Segment continental crosswalk markings'and appropriate signage. w Potential improvements could include pedestrian refuge BATTLER STa islands, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions, i 1 v advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting. • Implement designs at driveway entrances that minimize Yconflicts between cars and people walking and biking. DURHAM RD • • (ex:moving access to side streets over time through 11111 ^ redevelopment and/or consolidating access to minimize the number of driveways and turning movements.) I ( I ` 0 0,25 ,-0.5 MILES N Illor J ,i1, 1 High-visibility crosswalks(sometimes called "continental-style"crosswalks)have thick lines parallel to traffic flow that allow drivers to see the crosswalk from further away. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 35 Segment and Perspective Views NORTH SEGMENT PROJECT CI LANDAU ST LU Q 1� L--CUST ST z Locust Street - ;; I 00 Protected Intersection wxt. a t w• • • • • • North Segment: MAPLELEAF ST> �' > = Locust Street to Highway 99* oo a I— I o F oo oo 2K ST • Oak Street Enhanced Crossing Opportunity ti ' PINE ST r SPRUCE 3 Spruce Street Enhanced Crossing Opportunity Future public park 4 • • • •STEVE ST . Steve Street . i . ' Enhanced crossing opportunity LU LU >>y .•r > a with potential implementation of a a 4-4.1i a N_ 1- rectangular rapid flashing beacon 41, 4;cft-i a cc CO (RRFB). co f,- • t-- Li, 5 PFAFFLE ST Pfaffle Street _ .., School Traffic Signal I- 0 w . . Cr, Q ,� . : -. :1: ,-,, i 9 a • Route 78 Bus Stop North of > Highway 99 = 6 Right-of-Way Constraints r-00 0 G\F�GN PP "To see more details about these 71.1.5 recommendations,see the full 8 N recommendations table at the end of this chapter. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS l i L r -. L - •' •...w `.1 ENHANCED CROSSING WITH SAFTEY .- "-' • �_- ISLAND AND RECTANGULAR RAPID . - k •:. _ --- FLASHING DEACONS r44 � .:. '~ CONSISTENT WAYFINDING - -" -''. .- - - • _ SIGNAGE ALONG ROUTE - 11 .tkI 1 I' ,11 c �;a " i.rte /71F--flt- �� -Ammo, 6 FT SEPARATED AND �� ■ • RAISED BINE LANES . .$� I. NORTH SEGMENT CROSS SECTION Locust Street to Highway 99 The north segment of the Hall Boulevard NORTH FACING corridor visioning project extends from Locust Street to Highway 99.Today, the typical cross section found on Hall Boulevard along this extent includes two - general traffic lanes with a center turn 1�1i- . I idroP'�� lane.There are intermittent sidewalks and �/ substandard (<6ft)striped grade-level bike -.►' lanes.The proposed vision for a typical I �� r:► 7 cross section along Hall Boulevard in 7411 the north segment is to maintain the two I ICIO+ general traffic lanes with a center turn lane, and expand the total roadway footprint to 80ft wide to include consistent,grade Note that some locations such as the rendering of separated walking and biking facilities, Spruce St and Hall Blvd shown above, will deviate pedestrian-scale lighting and tree canopy. slightly from the typical cross section as needed. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 37 CENTRAL SEGMENT (A) , , PROJECT 0 co ; s '4. . 7 " _ • Highway 99 m -8 i ! s Protected Intersection i s 1 I. -A . Highway 99 N el's- G ;Y < Remove Slip Lane ilf 9 :, South of Highway 99 " +'_ Driveway access improvements •— i 1 ` • Central A Segment: `. • Highway 99 to Commercial Street* '. slc, • Knoll Drive ox,x>,/, Enhanced crossing opportunity ,s, 11. JIM* 10 ' with potential implementation of a rectangular rapid flashing beacon 11 I (RRFB). cr DowntowTigard n 6-1 • Knoll Drive rM " = Remove Northbound Right Turn Lane P •dr` \)- 12 ' $ Scoffins Street r- i v i kF Traffic Signal Changes and 2 . 7' Intersection Realignment. Study °o, , r Future Southwest feasibility of roundabout. '�F Corridor Light �ci9 Rail Station 13 ` :4• Commercial Street r `' Enhanced Crossing Opportunity ,r',;4:,7 "To see more details about these Orecommendations,see the full N recommendations table at the end of this chapter. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CENTRAL SEGMENT (A) CROSS SECTION NORTH FACING VAIN Mar NI t dna �t l I Hwy 99 to Commercial Street The central segment of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project extends from Highway 99 to Tigard Public Library. Today,the typical cross section found on Hall Boulevard along this extent includes two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane.There are intermittent sidewalks and substandard(<6ft)striped grade-level bike lanes.The proposed vision for a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard in the central segment is to maintain the two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane where needed,and expand the total roadway footprint to 90ft wide to include consistent, grade separated walking and biking facilities, pedestrian-scale lighting,and tree canopy. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 39 CENTRAL SEGMENT (B) cod PROJECT S T 1 14 Commercial Street Traffic Signal 15' • RR Crossing Bicycle-Pedestrian Railroad Crossing Proposed west side shared-use -: path extent BURNHA 16 • • Burnham Street • Right-of-Way Constraints • City Hall South of Burnham Street a' s Driveway access improvements 1111t: Irifilf•*‘ • • Central B Segment: Commercial Street to Omara Fanno Creek Street* Trail —* I Fanno Creek Park Fanno Creek Bridge Fanno Creek r • Bridge replacement to House —� accommodate all modes • Omara Street Tigard Enhanced crossing opportunity Library with potential implementation of a l l rectangular rapid flashing beacon OMARA ST (RRFB). "To see more details about these 4 recommendations,see the full N recommendations table at the end of this chapter. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS — . M "' a \ yam'.+ :t •'i �I - y :� -' i,= - 1, r' ENHANCED CROSSING WITH :t} _7.11- _ 4116i. •E . ' 1- ! X PEDESTRIAN HYBRID SIGNALS • '�.- • ` ■• g�`/�' f .`i r •-• r --. • • BENCHES WITH A .�•-'� - - --• :I '_.-.... INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE CREEK SIDE VIEW - —'�.E, - i 'tel. . �' WOODRUFF BRIDGE •�•L1:.i. .1..:-..:4;r„ • CONNECTION '-' y 'y • .A Y - �p rw _ a. ^'t" _ fera s`Y �e i • G �. +wM ' � F'011 -�F . rE' r •,',1, 1 i • --=-- •....,e ar..n•.4 .. % WIDE SIDEWALKS gignoppga, `'.': TWO-WAY RAISED WAYFINDING SIGNAGE r •Agif BIKE TRACT[ 0 y i I Commercial Street to Omara Street CENTRAL SEGMENT(B)CROSS SECTION The central segment of the Hall Boulevard NORTH FACING Corridor Visioning Project extends from Highway 99 to Tigard Public Library.Today, the typical cross section found on Hall ill Boulevard along this extent includes two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane.There are intermittent sidewalks and ! leir P'40974, !!' a substandard (<6ft)striped grade-level bike lanes.The proposed vision for a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard k„ i, in the central segment south of the future sl�� Southwest MAX Light Rail Station is to maintain the two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane,and expand the total roadway footprint to 90ft wide to include a shared-use path on the west side, pedestrian-scale lighting,and tree canopy. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 41 SOUTH SEGMENT 19 PROJECT 0 . is 4.., :fL. %iii ._ T Fanno Creek "!20 trail • Wall Street 1, Enhanced Crossing Opportunity 4,, ,,,, . 1 ii .... Between Regina Ln and Fanno 21 Jo ,,frokiri Creek Drive 4 .1- NOC,F, Enhanced crossing opportunity '•_ y .4•ii -r-s)3withpotential implementation of a J ,� rectangular rapid flashing beacon z - (RRFB). )ONALD ST +. 22 ,g . • McDonald Street V- ' ' - Protected Intersection, Traffic 1 ,, Signal Improvements. Study COLONY CREEK CT feasibility of roundabout. g • South A Segment: E'...", Omara St to Durham Road* . Fit, • GREENSWARD LN Vic' 23} - ''• Vci S4NN0W • Greenswald Ln w •10 j Enhanced crossing opportunity a with potential implementation of a Hrectangular rapid flashing beacon co ' Ai" , 1, (RRFB). ST ti,i. ,-T 24, • •BONITARO Bonita Road r w Protected Intersection, Traffic --83RD CT Signal Improvements. Study F - il y ps_._ feasibility of roundabout. • To see more details about these { + 4 e) recommendations,see the full JEBROOK ST ;^; r25 rt' recommendations table at the end of this chapter. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH SEGMENT (CONTINUED) L PROJECT 0 TX25 q South of Pinebrook Street Right-of-Way Constraints w + MURDOCK ST H ,26 'e Murdock Street SCHECKLA DR o a Enhanced crossing opportunity zcc with potential implementation of a 9r41 414 rectangular rapid flashing beacon MATTHEW PARK ST "� (RRFB). A ,,, - t� •mo_"' i LAI South B Segment: (` a Omara Street to Durham N Road* ;fiT_ ROSS ST :; • +._f ATTLER ST � � Sattler Street ii ,, '�. ti Protected Intersection 4,54 i� 5.F a. � m s KENTON DR =LOWER ST 33-1 I • • Ashford Street r-) e `' ! Enhanced crossing opportunity • with potential implementation of a a E �.+x'"1111 1 .f. rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB). ASHFORD ST • South of Ashford Street •i rLANGTREE ST Right-of-Way Constraints HAMLET ST A w Q • ' ' .4 Z • Avon Street N 00 Enhanced crossing opportunity BONAVENTURE LN with potential implementation of a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB). AVON ST ) o Cook • Durham Road School ZPark • Sch000l Protected Intersection / /•I/ !" .li ,I/ y` To see more details about these DURHAM RD 4 recommendations,see the full N recommendations table at the end of this chapter. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 43 SOUTH SEGMENT CROSS SECTION NORTH FACING 4. , 111 -1 Omara Street to Durham Road The south segment of the Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project extends from Tigard Public Library to Durham Road. Today,the typical cross section found on Hall Boulevard along this extent includes two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane.There are intermittent sidewalks and substandard(<6ft)striped grade-level bike lanes.The proposed vision for a typical cross section along Hall Boulevard in the south segment is to maintain the two general traffic lanes with a center turn lane, and expand the total roadway footprint to 90ft wide to include consistent,grade separated walking and biking facilities, pedestrian-scale lighting,and tree canopy. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Why Three Lanes? Wouldn't More Lanes Be Better? In each study segment,the proposed typical cross section for Hall Boulevard offers a three lane cross section (two general traffic lanes and center turn lane). In our outreach, a handful of people expressed concern that the City isn't widening Hall Boulevard in anticipation of future growth. Here's why the concept plan calls for maintaining three lanes: A THREE LANE STREET.. ...is consistent with the 2040 TSP which ...has fewer private property impacts. plans for a future 3-lane section. ► ...allows for pedestrian refuge islands ► ...easily accommodates up to between and shorter crossing distances. Crossing 20-22k Average Daily Traffic and Hall Blvd a five-lane roadway introduces new carries between 13-17k Average Daily Traffic safety challenges, especially for people today. with disabilities, children, and seniors. Specifically,when people cross two or ► ...is not unlikely to worsen congestion. more lanes of traffic,they are especially Increasing the number of lanes in a roadway vulnerable to vehicles in the innermost induces demand,where travel times lanes whose sightlines are blocked by the temporarily decrease but then increase vehicles stopped in the outermost lane. again as more traffic routes onto the newly This is known as the multiple threat issue. built lanes. ...frees up more space in the public right- • ...supports more multimodal infrastructure of-way for higher quality walking and which improves both the safety and biking facilities, as well as trees and storm overall capacity of the roadway. Providing water infrastructure. sidewalks and bike lanes which have smaller footprints but are more efficient at moving ► ...is in line with the City's stated priorities. people increases capacity without adding The City of Tigard is committed to travel lanes.As a gateway to downtown, creating a well-connected, attractive, and schools, parks, and the library, Hall accessible pedestrian network. Its plans Boulevard should be designed for people in and policies call for improved walkability, addition to car throughput. safety, accessibility, carbon responsibility, and multimodal transportation on its ► ...is less costly to build and maintain. streets. ► ...makes accessing businesses along Hall Boulevard by walking and rolling more pleasant. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 45 Key Intersections LOCUST STREET ,, t. t.14i0,-",,.e.(7 ' '.." e )1 Pl•4 P '. " . 1111114L. r- v1/4 1,t.1 } Iry r r 1 _ " ?.- --Z r-, 02, 1,. _F-- ...:: 1 / / ''./ C:Thi.. ) . '''''' ' .-;; .../25 f/ - . 1 PROTECTED 11-1 11. ., it 1 ' ... bit (- ` '-'7--j4 . / /ir INTERSECTION Illustration of a protected intersection design for Hall Boulevard/Locust Street. Description Outcome As the terminus for the Hall Boulevard corridor in Protected intersections create shorter, simpler Tigard, Locust St serves as an important intersection crossings, more predictable movements, and for local businesses as well as students accessing better visibility between people on bikes and Metzger Elementary School. This intersection people driving. As a result,the intersection is more is one of a handful of intersections along Hall comfortable and safer for people using the bikeway Boulevard recommended to be reconstructed as a and the crosswalk. protected intersection. NM O I Clear Sight Distance 1 No Stopping/No Standing 1 3 i lig,\ 4 1 \/ y • <?') I I. q, 2 Left:Design guidance for V ' protected intersections. Source:NACTO 2023 • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS HUNZIKER-SCOFFINS �_ � - IS - L..i- -- _ .J r SY. PIS - ------ --- 41410. -4, .- f f The Hunziker-Scoffins intersection is offset, creating mobility challenges for all modes. Description Outcome Today,the intersection of Scoffins Street and Realigning the intersection will offer the City an Hunziker Street is offset, creating a complicated opportunity to simplify and improve the intersection intersection that is difficult to navigate for all modes. for people walking, biking, driving, and taking the Long crossing distances, substandard bike lanes, bus. The realignment would also allow for a more and multiple traffic signals are a few of the reasons seamless transition for the Southwest Corridor light why long-range plans call for this intersection to rail line into downtown Tigard. be realigned (see Tigard's TSP: Project ID S-25). Additionally,this intersection will need to be intersection operations will need to be improved. if the Southwest Corridor light rail is built, due to its proximity to the planned alignment. This plan recommends rebuilding the intersection as a protected intersection, or studying the possibility for a roundabout. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 47 Recommendations Table ID Location Category Recommendation 1 Locust St Protected Intersection Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people driving. 2 Oak St Enhanced Crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity.An enhanced crossing facility would use Opportunity high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and appropriate signage. Potential improvements could include,leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting. 3 Spruce St Enhanced Crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity.An enhanced crossing facility would use Opportunity high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and appropriate signage. Potential improvements could include pedestrian refuge islands, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting.This recommendation aligns with an ODOT project:SW Hall Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Improvements SW Hemlock Street and SW Spruce Street? 4 Steve St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 5 Pfaffle St Traffic Signal A new traffic signal at Hall Boulevard and Pfaffle St has been funded.This recommendation is to further enhance the pedestrian crossings,such as high-visibility continental crosswalks on all three legs of the intersection, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,and additional lighting. Funded in the FY23-24 budget.See 95054 Hall Boulevard Pfaffle St New Traffic Signal.(Funding source:Transportation Development Tax, Transportation SDC)page 204.See also:TSP Project S-22,page 90. 6 Route 78 Bus Stop Right-of-Way This area is too narrow for the typical cross section to fit.Special design North of Highway Constraints considerations will be needed to accommodate all modes.until such time 99 that adjacent properties redevelop. 1 OR 141:SW Hall Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Improvements SW Hemlock Street and SW Spruce Street. More information here:https://www.oregon.gov/odot/projects/pages/project-details.aspx?project=22647 • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ID Location Category Recommendation 7 Hwy 99 Protected Intersection Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people driving. 8 Hwy 99 Remove Slip Lane Signal timing improvements,improved crosswalks at the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Highway 99.A complete removal is proposed for the right turn slip lane on Highway 99 on the southwest corner of the intersection. This would allow for safer pedestrian crossings to the south side of the intersection and improve the access to downtown. 9 South of Highway Access Management An access restriction and/or intersection reconfiguration is proposed at 99 this location to reduce conflicts for turning vehicles and improve traffic flow on Hall Boulevard.This could include blocking vehicle access completely, restricting vehicle turning movements to"right-in,right-out",or using signage to partially restrict access to one direction. 10 Knoll Dr Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 11 Knoll Dr Remove Northbound Removal of northbound right turn lane is proposed at the intersection of Right Turn Lane Hall Boulevard and Knoll Dr to reduce conflicts and increase separation for people walking and biking. 12 Scoffins St Traffic Signal Changes The intersection of Hall Boulevard and Hunziker Rd will be reconfigured and Intersection to align with Scoffins St.These changes will require traffic signal Realignment. changes.Consider a protected intersection design.See Tigard's 2040 Study feasibility of Transportation System Plan project S-25 on page 91.Additionally,study roundabout. the potential for implementing a roundabout at this location during the engineering and design phase. 13 Commercial St Enhanced Crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity.An enhanced crossing facility would use Opportunity high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and appropriate signage. Potential improvements could include pedestrian refuge islands, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting. 14 Commercial St Traffic Signal New traffic signal at Hall Boulevard and Commercial St. Include high- visibility continental crosswalks on all three legs of the intersection. 15 RR Crossing Bicycle-Pedestrian Construct a pedestrian and bicycle rail road crossing perpendicular to the Railroad Crossing railway. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 49 ID Location Category Recommendation 16 Burnham St Right-of-Way This recommendation is to further enhance the pedestrian crossings,by Constraints including high-visibility continental crosswalks on all three legs of the intersection,leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,and additional lighting. 17 South of Burnham Access Management An access restriction and/or intersection reconfiguration for is proposed at St this location to reduce conflicts for turning vehicles and improve traffic flow on Hall Boulevard.This could include blocking vehicle access completely, restricting vehicle turning movements to"right-in,right-out",or using signage to partially restrict access to one direction. 18a Fanno Creek Trail Enhanced Crossing This plan recommends installing a Pedestrian Hybrid Signal for the Fanno Crossing Opportunity Creek Trail crossing just north of the bridge.See TSP Project IDs:S-18, S-19,AT-15. 18b Fanno Creek Bridge replacement Reconstruct Fanno Creek Bridge to the typical cross section identified in Bridge to accommodate all this plan. RTP ID:12003.See TSP Project IDs:S-18,S-19,AT-15. modes 19 Omara St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 20 Wall St Enhanced Crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity.An enhanced crossing facility would use Opportunity high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and appropriate signage. Potential improvements could include pedestrian refuge islands, leading pedestrian intervals,curb extensions,advanced stop bars and/or additional lighting. 21 Between Regina Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a Ln and Fanno opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility Creek Dr with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 22 McDonald St Protected Intersection, Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected Traffic Signal intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable Improvements. movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people Study feasibility of driving. Include traffic signal timing improvements to improve traffic flow on roundabout. Hall Boulevard between McDonald St and Bonita Rd.Study feasibility of roundabout during engineering and design phase.See TSP Projects IDs S-19,S-20. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ID Location Category Recommendation 23 Greenswald Ln Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. Include an access restriction and/or intersection a rectangular rapid reconfiguration for is proposed at Greensward Ln to reduce conflicts for flashing beacon(RRFB). turning vehicles and improve traffic flow on Hall Boulevard.This could include blocking vehicle access completely,restricting vehicle turning movements to"right-in,right-out",or using signage to partially restrict access to one direction. 24 Bonita Rd Protected Intersection, Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected Traffic Signal intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable Improvements. movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people Study feasibility of driving. Include traffic signal timing improvements to improve traffic flow on roundabout. Hall Boulevard between McDonald St and Bonita Rd. 25 South of Pinebrook Right-of-Way This area is too narrow for the typical cross section to fit.Special design St Constraints considerations will be needed to accommodate all modes. 26 Murdock St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 27 Sattler St Protected Intersection Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people driving. 28 Ashford St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 29 South of Ashford Right-of-Way This area is too narrow for the typical cross section to fit.Special design St Constraints considerations will be needed to accommodate all modes. 30 Avon St Enhanced crossing Enhanced crossing opportunity with potential implementation of a opportunity rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB).An enhanced crossing facility with potvential would use high-visibility continental crosswalk markings and advanced implementation of warning signage. a rectangular rapid flashing beacon(RRFB). 31 Durham Rd Protected Intersection Reconstruct intersection to protected intersection standards. Protected intersections create shorter,simpler crossings, more predictable movements,and better visibility between people on bikes and people driving. Include traffic signal timing improvements to improve traffic flow on Hall Boulevard between McDonald St and Bonita Rd. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 51 r. .. . } • \ v i',wilt ..;r/. i: w .4 r0. y. A + 4• - - ' • .- -. allf sii ...:5 ,.. • • --. .. 7 1 +Ori• iQ .;•r . �. f 44110.dr•. .. 0.-•v yr -! 10 - f 0 ••- . —••- • ' -" ' Pr 4 ' ." . • J'J •�-'•-,.- p �i 'n.. —•'. rte • -' " - , �' iY:i r a' W ...• • }1 S.rY • 11 a .` �Y. a, • 1 r•' �' • • 7 i. ,.'i.fs ��.^ • ;' `� •'_t1�}iy'r•••'.�•1.y�?['y;=`_+•.. ;�7n:.fir:'.: • •"' ' ' s '_- `� - _ 7 ..'�,, , • k -'••••-PirPOP F0.741 1 . Rift 1�-. • •' ••I' 1 >"' 4. .1 -�{:IIS•1 .' '1yr' 9^ ' 6. DISCUSSION Undertaking a project of this magnitude and North segment. The first is at Steve St, which doesn't complexity presents many challenges and connect to Hall Boulevard. A new park is planned in a uncertainties, especially given the numerous potential parcel adjacent to Steve St, but the plans don't include funding scenarios and evolving circumstances. In a connection to Hall Boulevard. The project team still this section,we discuss the various segments of the recommends a mid-block crossing at this location Hall Boulevard project in greater detail to help the despite this fact, because the next available crossings City make informed decisions as funding sources are either Spruce Street or Pfaffle Street, nearly a materialize and opportunities emerge. quarter mile apart. The second mid-block crossing is proposed at the first bus stop north of Highway 99. This crossing is already marked, has signage, North Segment (Locust Street to and employs a pedestrian refuge island. However, it Highway 99) currently does not offer facilities for people biking that There are several key implementation notes to would be considered sufficient for riders of all ages consider during future phases of work in the North and abilities. Special design considerations will need segment. First,while each of the intersections along to be taken at this location to accommodate all modes. Hall Boulevard should feature safe bicycle and pedestrian crossings,the design of the protected In terms of existing right-of-way,the North segment is the most constrained. The proposed cross section Locust Street intersection will be especially critical [ due to the number of school trips it facilitates (or design is narrower than the other segments but will could facilitate) between Metzger Elementary still likely deviate from the typical cross section in and neighborhoods to the north and east of the certain areas. The difference between the proposed intersection. vision for the North segment and the available right- of-way is especially pronounced between Oak Street Additionally,the City was awarded $1M in ODOT Safe and Spruce Street. Future phases of work should Routes to School (SRTS)funding to add a sidewalk study the option for no center left turn lane at Spruce on the north side of Locust St between Hall Blvd and Street as a way to save space. 92nd Ave. This project should be completed with an understanding that this sidewalk will connect to a In terms of prioritizing implementation,the North future protected intersection at Hall. Similarly, ODOT segment is adjacent to residential areas with the was awarded a federal earmark of$4M for improved greatest transportation equity needs along the pedestrian crossings and sidewalk infill on Spruce corridor. The segment also has the most substandard Street. This work should be coordinated to fulfill the infrastructure and therefore has the greatest potential future vision of Hall Boulevard along this segment. to leverage State of Good repair funding toward Lastly, ODOT will be rebuilding the Highway 217 achieving the Hall Boulevard vision. Additionally,the North segment has other incoming projects, such as Bridge. The future bridge will include sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides. The design of the North sidewalks on Locust St Prioritizing the Hall Boulevard segment should account for this and attempt to add improvements between Spruce and Locust would help separation between the bike lane and the travel lane to complement these projects and together would to the extent possible, either as a painted buffer or have a greater impact on the quality of the bicycle and pedestrian network than if say,the section between using flexible delineators. Pfaffle St and Hwy 99 were prioritized, because the There are two mid-block crossings proposed for the three projects would not connect. HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 53 Central Segment (A) (Highway 99 to challenges in acquiring more due to the position of Commercial Street) existing buildings relative to the property lines. At the start of the project,the Central segment was Finally,this segment of Hall Boulevard is adjacent considered one segment due to the difference in to some of its highest equity need areas, and so land uses from the northern and southern extents additional attention to the transportation needs and of the corridor. However, during the alternatives impacts of the work on the surrounding community development phase, it became clear that the Central should be factored into the implementation of the segment should be divided into two subsegments proposed improvements in this area. to include the unique design found within Central segment(B). Central Segment (B) (Commercial Street The most critical intersection of the segment is to Omara Street) at Highway 99. The project team recommends a The Central segment(B) has the most unique protected intersection design and removal of the proposed cross section among the four segments. eastbound to southbound slip lane among other This segment accounts for the future Southwest improvements. The scale of the work needed to make Corridor light rail station and has the highest the intersection of Hall Boulevard and Highway 99 is concentration of destinations along the corridor: large and would require significant coordination with downtown,the Fanno Creek Trail, and the Tigard ODOT even after the jurisdictional transfer, and would Library. These are the factors that prompted the likely be completed as a standalone effort separate inclusion of the west side shared use path. from the implementation of the Hall Boulevard corridor work. Still,this is the most important intersection in The implementation of this segment will impact the use the City of Tigard from a safety perspective, so any of these facilities.The northern terminus at Commercial changes to the intersection that could be completed Street is intended to be a gateway into downtown with funding for this project should be attempted. as well as facilitate people traveling between transit stations, and so its design should incorporate Between Highway 99 and Hunziker Street,there wayfinding signage and seating. The crossing on are no marked crossings, which prompted the the north leg should be enhanced to facilitate travel recommendation for a crossing at Garden Place. After between downtown,the light rail, and north bound gathering public input however,this recommendation cyclists looking to transition back to the east side. was moved to Knoll Street. The distance between Highway 99 and Scoffins Street is roughly 1,500 feet, Another key implementation consideration is the enough distance that another marked crossing could railroad crossing. The crossing should include be considered. pedestrian and bicycle signals and/or gate treatments. These elements should be emphasized on the west The proposed cross section for Central segment(A) side with the shared use path. The design of the west is similar to that of the North segment, but calls for a side pedestrian and bicycle facilities will need to bend wider footprint. This wider footprint manifests in larger away from Hall Boulevard and intersect the railroad sidewalks (10' instead of 8')to accommodate the perpendicularly. This will require additional right-of- increased pedestrian traffic in and around downtown way from the railroad authority. The east side however, Tigard. While it has more right-of-way than the north won't require as intensive of a treatment as it will segment, Central segment(A) has less than Central only have an on-street northbound bike lane and 6' B and the South segments, and would face greater sidewalk. • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION Next,the Fanno Creek Bridge will need to be assessment of these two locations suggested that completely replaced to accommodate the proposed roundabouts would be difficult to implement without cross section for Central segment(A). Within the significant right-of-way acquisition and earthwork. segment,the available right-of-way is least flexible However, additional study would help the City between the Fanno Creek Bridge and Omara Street. understand if the extra effort could improve/smooth However, a southbound center left turn lane won't traffic flow(rather than reduce congestion) significantly be necessary at Omara Street, so a two-lane cross reduce congestion. The City will need to acquire section could be implemented to save space. right-of-way immediately south of Bonita Road, or else it will be forced to implement a design that deviates Recently, ODOT submitted a federal earmark($4M) significantly from the proposed cross section. for a pedestrian crossing at Omara Street. If granted, the timing of this work should be coordinated with the ODOT included Ashford Street in the same federal rebuilding of the roadway at this location, because this earmark as Omara Street. Should this funding become crossing will function as the southern terminus of the available,the Ashford Street crossing should be shared-use path. At this end,the path should function implemented in a way that fulfills the vision for the as a gateway to the library and help facilitate travel to South segment.At this location there is also a right-of- and from the Fanno Creek Trail, so wayfinding signage way pinchpoint just south of Ashford Street. and seating in this area may be especially important. Additionally,this crossing would be where people Durham Road, like Locust Street, is one of the most biking northbound would have the option to either important intersections along the whole corridor for continue northbound on and on-street bike lane or students, given its proximity to Tigard High School. transition to the shared-use path, so an RRFB or other Given the way the school is oriented relative to the user activated crossing is recommended. Both the rest of the network, Hall Boulevard would be the most Commercial Street and Omara Street crossings should direct north south connection for students walking include bike crossing markings. and biking to school. Improvements in Central B will be easier than those in Finally,the City should consider implementing Central A to complete in the near term because of the traffic calming infrastructure along SW 85th Ave to uncertainty around the Southwest Corridor light rail facilitate the connection between Hall Boulevard and and the subsequent realignment of Hunziker St and Cook Park. Scoffins St. Additionally, coordinating the proposed In terms of prioritizing implementation,the south protected intersection at Hall Boulevard and Hwy 99 segment's largest challenge will be the section with ODOT itself would likely be a larger task than between Bonita Rd and McDonald St. The section implementing the whole vision for segment Central B. between Bonita Rd and Durham could be a good candidate for interim bike infrastructure like separated South Segment (Omara Street to bike lanes with delineators, and would enhance the Durham Road) connection between bike facilities on Durham Rd and Sattler St. There are also multiple locations in which Hall Boulevard's most heavily traveled section is crossing improvements would support transit stops between Bonita Road and McDonald Street. Given and connections to neighborhood paths. Focusing that Hall Boulevard, a north-south roadway,facilitates on improvements in this section first would have the so much east-west travel,the project team proposes benefits of connecting more residential areas directly studying the potential for roundabouts during the to Tigard High School and Cook Park. design phase at these two locations. A preliminary HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 55 IMPLEMENTATION Cost Estimate by multiple sources and over varying timeframes. Prioritization of the improvements will be necessary if After the second round of public engagement, in the funding and timing realities force the vision to be which community members were asked to provide implemented incrementally. Prioritization should be feedback on the proposed concepts,the project based on a number of factors, including geography, team began estimating the costs of the final need,timing, phasing, benefits and cost. recommendations in each segment. These estimates are considered "planning level" and are the project ► Need: Projects could be prioritized by team's current estimate for the price tag associated with implementing the vision using current material infrastructure needs and equity considerations and construction costs. of an area relative to the rest of the corridor. The greatest difference between State of Good The construction cost to rebuild Hall Boulevard Repair costs and the costs associated with as proposed in this plan is estimated to be the Hall Boulevard vision exists in the North approximately$61.1M, or roughly double that of segment. The highest scoring equity areas the cost to bring the roadway up to a State of are in the North Segment and the Central A Good Repair. This does not include the soft costs segment. of engineering or design work, nor does it include the costs of moving utilities and acquiring right- ► Timing/proximity: Some improvements may of-way. These additional costs can vary but our be more suitable than others to combine initial estimates place the total cost including these or coincide with other capital improvement expenses at over$100M. projects, land development, or funding opportunities that make their implementation It is worth noting that these improvements are investments with the potential for long-term cost easier and enhance the overall effect. This benefits, not only in terms of safety but also in will be necessary in comparing city identified attracting private sector development. Metro's Betterments vs. State of Good Repair report on active transportation return on investment improvements. quantifies some of these economic advantages, ► Geography:this document outlines 4 key study emphasizing the opportunity costs of delaying these areas which could serve as logical groupings crucial enhancements.' for a larger improvement project, even if other parts of the corridor can't be implemented until Prioritization later. Given the scale and complexity of the proposed ► Benefits: Some improvement projects improvements, it is likely the project will be funded represent"low-hanging fruit" in that the cost to implement them is small relative to the benefits 1 Active Transportation Return on Investment Study that they provide. Examples of these could be Metro(2022). https://www.oregonmetro.gov/active- transportation-return-investment-study enhanced crossings near key destinations like • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION schools and parks. starting with another non-connecting section like Pfaffle St to Hwy 99. ► Cost: On a per mile basis,the Central segment (B)would cost the most to implement given the ► Prioritizing improvements in Central B may complexity of the cross section and the scale be more feasible in the near term due to the of constraints faced in that segment; however, uncertainties surrounding the Southwest at just over$6M, it would be less expensive Corridor light rail and the subsequent to construct than the South segment,which realignment of Hunziker St and Scoffins would cost over twice as much. The South St. Coordinating the proposed protected segment is the next most expensive segment intersection at Hall Boulevard and Hwy 99 with on a per mile basis due to its wider footprint. ODOT will likely be a larger task, making the The segment of greatest overlap between completion of Central A improvements more State of Good Repair costs and the costs challenging than those in Central B, despite associated with the Hall Boulevard vision Central B having a slightly higher cost per mile. (in other words,the segment with the most ► The main implementation challenge for the opportunity to align State of Good Repair South segment lies in the stretch between funding with the vision) exists in the North Bonita Rd and McDonald St. Focusing efforts segment,where the existing infrastructure is on the segment from Bonita Rd to Durham Rd least sufficient. with interim bike infrastructure and crossing ► Phasing: some improvements are more suitable improvements would better connect existing than others to be phased in over time, starting bike facilities and support transit stops, with semi-permanent infrastructure. For benefiting residential areas and enhancing example, rather than a raised curb protected access to Tigard High School and Cook Park. bike lane,the City could consider buffer striping and delineators in strategic locations. Project Prioritization by Segment: ► Prioritizing the implementation of Hall Boulevard improvements in the North segment between Spruce St and Locust St may be beneficial. Prioritizing this section would complement incoming projects such as the sidewalks on Locust St and Spruce St, which would enhance the bicycle and pedestrian network's overall quality more effectively than HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I CONSIDERATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION 57 t\,... .=--y. -,..74/1• ',T..", .,...._,,.... ; --..• ,...,_ -:.---,... ...."•”". '4:-,- 4.-. , - • .... ..----, ---• •.- • :- , +"...- 7;71.1.,- :"--. "--. -•• ••7',..4ifii -- 6.Sa. .- ''' • - • •',1-`,7'1 --. .---f,?.. • -- ' .- 4.1.••• , 4.• `.-k-' -''' • •-t-. ...1'.• ',', ... ,-: , - ' _...; • • • -,. ' , -5•....- .6-- +1g1;" -- • .:.±.,-.,--., .••• ;4•7.•C--t•tt. •--AL, -- • . 3 .._ • 'f' * ••••4 •.:.- -re •-• l••I - .- •, _ •-.-:- • `. ..,,-.-. ` „ . ''''---.);bie "-•.r 4-`..-•- • , r;q -- °L,4v,-.•: -:-•• _.,.... • . t•• - .. -. _ ._. -„.-.... -.4....-q":-._ -,,_ ,...2-: -.L. • - .4,,,-,.•-. , ..-"y_..- _ •,; • -r-•• .:;_1.1:.• I. • -..' - - -• , .. ._,.. . „_ ., . • : • . .J... -,-.. .-;-ISCA-4-‘.-. '-' -r.i:-.-.`. ''''..----...-74D-A- 1:.;. •;',1,114.1,14,....ar'.'Qra'''..., , ---'" ." •,:-.Whio . • %•!'.14.' ``fft; - .A.- -','"-•'. &-`‘'-.- ---.---,-et- ,.:,„.. .-, . - -. -. ,.i - _ . ___,. __-_t-_-4,..„ -N.,..,...•,.„ - _.„... .._ , ,..._,. , .. .. . . . ..i .... --- __ ,.. AV , t-- -k. • '- '.-- '"•-'-..-- :---'--:': - ••' ?.-f-:'--- -.- L.-.\ii.a.d.r 1„•L:- ',, .. w•---- ',-=-- "- '••-t-' •:-- !1•'-` 1;•-•'''' '-= ...., ..ki- ' ^"2'-'0. :- . ••‘'-.:;., -,--•',7-- - -- - - 1.- '..--.--"k--' =-4 .j.- . ' .•-•=-----•-_. . IT---r., • - ._ -- W.--- - ----r-.• -= .-.-_---:"..:',7-':t --In- -, 'IC '• 46. 41111. . . '` '--- ' . • _ . „ ...• . ,,,‘#.74._,L•_...• -,-.a.-• „;_::..., .._ ',•_, . _. , •-.g'r...,, -„,...4-•'--, - 1111hk 4 -4a -..'".p...ON. - - ,---jp-•-• ..:-•;! • , v - - ...A7 .1".•: - ...• ... et. ir,.t..- . . 1111 . -- -`-- --..--._____- •-• - N.- -'• 4S• •-'`' - , •41510 At4-:..'•:' L-`•.4 - "-„ -4:1. .".:•:.147-.Si* t .-44• "454 •• '- 4111k"S5' *'..' .'2..'''' ' 'e- .., .. 1- ,...,•It , - .i/..„- .....k - ...".•-.... ..."14.7.4.. _ ..... 5 ... _,.. SP,. -17•'. .--- . 2 •••-- -':-.11i-... . 1„N'114 '. .,,.... -..r. -•-• Ti,%. ...• .,r_•- i 1 • ..,.:., _ -.....- - - -4,-,.--•-•--4-• ,.-...",-4-• ' . -4.-- ,,,,.•-v.,••, . .ir -.•_ ,. •-•.,---t-,- '.,...-;i!-.,---,1-,,_1-_ Jr4 - •.•f'-•... -iL.:4 • . /ft . „ 1 ... 4 •:- It' ' .- — '' • ip*k- --. 1111116k '' ''''''.44!--7........ •" '.. ',..1.% --LC<-Pr ..... ..- . t-AP. . ,-,.. . - •7! - •. .5_,.;-:..0_,- ..,. -,. - .--.. ______.„.., . Al - f -'- ••••-Ut- .-r". •-_.:- - -t-'• :r•,i.• .....-•e• r'..., r: -'--=- - t I - l',`-N--'t • .•:-Ct.- -;i:--„„-‘,__,,,,,_•.;-='.41f.4-•.w.ig-•'... '':44"••2..V --- -.4..,;'...4.. .4."-1-•,. .• -.... -4. vIk•-.:'3.: - i - - 16k::•.-Le.-'41A:--kS4S.52-q.'Ir.', 42f2A-; ----r.• : :::. •. t'- -'...:;t..t...... :-.' -N I. . i. 4 ' Y '',.' -,''A''t .a,..;Z.44•71•7..... 4!"*.!':' :24441''f. --'-S'-'1-•'4-• 4.'4.''- -..' )' , ..,, _,..67. -_,.4:.__ :1,...VEA. ,. • a"-..*-..,-.._ *.I.:T."'}.:•. - -......-- ''',-..- .:1/4N.-,...-e.: -A:F.-..l.......‘"`„tits&-4.7-......_•::14.A.... . 4..-7- _.2;;.-.....,,',L... - -- E:a - -.._..._- ._,_00.1....,,,,,,,'"L..:..--k .....,,,i , .r...,....,A.. - .._ - .....ve7c. ,22. , .., mr,-.4tio-t.••h-, .. - - - -- --••-••.....- .... . '. - . a. - • -‘ .r--.. .•21 ._.-----, '- .-4'5#-- --- '- ' --. . 4 _ .... . .._.__ -_ .1 . - . . . . , - -,... . . . . - _ ... . •• , - i , . . -- - 4 •--!--.7'•-,s7 • - -, .,_,-, 7.,...i•-• ,• ..•)--1.s./7-1..-'77' q.,...-"••1-:41.4CH_.r3„*:--::-...;'•*- - .. L..: • 4 •••••,.- • . , - - r-- . ---- - - • L • •' --5. • ‘ is.- _I..- - N-_-....-:. 4-....--. •- .- .. _. . -.- T..,_ 5 .-..- ,. . ,__.. - ' ---N, -- -' -'‘-'''---''' • • "lit- ,- -- "-:'" - •git::F.-1.—rg - - -' " -y;,4P-4•-ildr.-„,v2,---'-',..,j.'--1:::,--N.:-..p•-__*;', ..v.A4.-., . ..,. . ..., 1,7---.- , -.a:4,p,- . .--- ,..... ,-,..-, . - ....-t .„. , . ,........4. ._ .„,..w..4, . ..._ . _ ..., , -rt4-.--iii-:-:-- -: .. i4,-.1'7` 'rr•V 1P- ..-- • '- - •_ .,...• . ."."-7, ;4--„,„e•-x-,,k,a,A,„$..__K:oi....4- - ,. -.,:a„---25144.-."--.-...,--: r-...-.•-• — • ,k ...:• • -.•-,r4,j1/2.....„-lt:IFI',„ - _ 711r4J'-'4"-liit,N....'-- -!-"-,-, atr. - - '.-'7.- --.'i.rsl..'.tmk-7-4--rFi,r,--p,-.,-;-rs --:::,---,-.,:-_ ? •-•..., -F,..;:,—..,-ig• 1 - , .„:-...7._......,...„,„7„,e,..„. ,;,...,:„...,ssi,....: _. ;I.,„........,.....„,...., -...- .'-iki4•47-(1.1.:t.iZ:r'ir'4---:.'-',C-Lek?;;ZI,i4iaiC41'....1-.'. '1"f5D..-'.....---4P' -414.12-51 ''' - .- . '-- '4',.,\ . -'.‘ :.'. .44.0.7.-*7-',.e•e4:-IL.S....-11';;•:i,'.-!;',....M.- -41/4:".. '.4...' .?._7...-,‘_.,re..i.k.;:«-e471f..f. _•_':fr;41..."-..•10,7 4...;_- ;A...4"C„,E, r'''''.... .,1'. %., ---- _ - •- - 40_. ,. _4 -:71.• -,;.4, _ •-',0,-;:... .,_:,..4,7t.... e-„, . 4 ;it-o.:•*..-I.,..?..,---'7-...---A-07.-:f.,.;v_.:--,i-r;f:417,49, -,-,-,:-,-;:-... 'T iri,<:-.-",. ...r,.., ' - - 4-'4. ' -k; '• -'44.`,..._--- ,--- - •----`k-•-•..• - -F., . -t",-.11•14.---z---)-..-it,?.......;t1••:,---m-.)..v..-,c-,:-.A,A.•=e3gig._ „......_ --.:%ke,...4, ,•—• • . :-....,.4.,:,..a. . ...-. _,---, - •- ' ..„-. ..,...••:•;„. ...---L-•- -4`•••••• • -=C .. N.,. •••• -.fflr....- • -11.474...i- . .7-S•e-• 1-"i4 '-',Lt.• '- N..-.',...‘71,‘;'6.!..... _.,-,.„,_-7-77,40_'__•:!•' • - ''"3-'1* 'i ' .-N.. ' -4V-11,... •11-,As.ISA.?-1!%rn- -14.' - w.• -ASTeow t_ , --.-m ,., ct 4`,. ,..4rieM.' . f.t.e..;:,'. •' --,' 4.--- , •-rrk-i. ....`:-,1/2•-„- . - , - ... • . , ." -. ,-,,,,6,H•,-- .4!... • , -'----.-.4,_.,.i-..',,,.::.i,,,,,er,..it- ., ...,,le,.,a_..,,-,,,:,-/t,,,,,-3.•,..0 ,...., -•• - - - -- .F....,- - 1. APPENDIX MEMORANDUM d I To: Dave Roth,Joe Wisniewski P.E.,City of Tigard From: Derek Abe, Phil Longenecker Alta Planning+Design Date: 8/01/2022 Re: Hall Boulevard Corridor Visioning Project Task 2.2—Existing Conditions Memo Existing Conditions Memorandum This memo addresses the existing conditions,opportunities, and constraints to multimodal connections near and along Hall Boulevard.This memo will summarize City policies,consider current and future access along the corridor, and review similar assessments conducted for Hall Boulevard. Lastly,this memo will highlight key features of the corridor,summarize the transportation context of the area and provide a foundation for the visioning project.The various sections in this memo are listed below: 1. Plan Review 2. Introduction to Project Area a. Project Extent b. Equity and Demographics c. Existing and Planned Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks d. Transit Context e. Vehicular and Truck Traffic 3. Collisions and Safety 4. Key Development Areas 5. Right of Way 6. Project Opportunities and Constraints Plan Review City of Tigard Transportation System Plan (2022) The 2040 Transportation System Plan (TSP)was initiated in 2020 and responds to a new strategic vision for Tigard's future,which emphasizes developing a multi-modal transportation system that is walkable, healthy, sustainable, and accessible for everyone.This TSP serves as an important long-range planning tool for Tigard to ensure its transportation system can meet community needs, realize the City's strategic vision, and conform to state and regional policies. The TSP discusses Hall Boulevard in the following ways: • Hall Boulevard will be a key north-south route between neighborhoods within Tigard, providing a critical function for accessing Downtown,the Tigard Transit Center,the Tigard Triangle, numerous civic uses, Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 59 MEMORANDUM alta including the library. With a potential for jurisdictional transfer of this road,the city has an interest in enhancing this corridor with improved sidewalks and bikeways between SW Omara Street and Pacific Highway. • The need to update the characterization of Hall Boulevard to reflect the jurisdictional transfer from ODOT to the City of Tigard. • Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard are the primary access routes to the downtown area. • The need to reexamine the alignment of Scoffins St/Hunziker St at Hall Boulevard. • The percentage of youth under age 18 is fairly evenly distributed across the City, but the senior population is heavily concentrated in the southeast neighborhoods between Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard. • Improving pedestrian and bicycle crossing opportunities at the intersection of Commercial Street and Hall Boulevard. City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020—2025 In 2019,the City embarked on a journey to refresh Tigard's Strategic Plan, last updated in 2015.The purpose of the strategic plan is to set a focus for how the city's vision and direction will be achieved.The strategic plan helps an organization allocate resources, set priorities, and states what it will say yes to.The plan outlines a vision,which intends to highlight where we want to go as a city and what we want to be.The new vision emphasizes equity,walkability, health, and accessibility. The second strategic priority is to create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible pedestrian network.The objectives and actions relating to this priority that are relevant to the Hall Boulevard project are listed below: • Create a well-connected pedestrian network that links all Tigard residents and businesses. • Bring parks and trailheads within a 10-minute walk of every Tigard resident. • Design the trail system to serve both recreational and active transportation purposes. • Invest in infrastructure that increases public safety such as trail lighting. • Ensure inclusive and accessible design is included in the design guidelines and implemented through the ADA Transition Plan, Parks Master Plan, and Pedestrian Network Plan. Tigard Complete Streets Policy Implementation Plan (2019) At its heart,the Strategic Plan sets forth a vision for Tigard to build its unique identity as the most walkable community in the Pacific Northwest.Achieving this outcome requires a practical, policy-driven "Complete Streets" approach that reconsiders how Tigard plans and invests in its transportation system.The Complete Streets policy is therefore critical to the visioning of Hall Boulevard. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard 60 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM dl .4 Below are the guiding principles of the Complete Streets policy: 2.1 Serve All Users 2.2 Provide Interconnected Networks 2.3 Use Best Practices and Innovative, Context-Sensitive Design 2.4 Support Land Use Planning Goals 2.5 Internal and Jurisdictional Coordination 2.6 Measure Performance City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan (2019) The City of Tigard Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP) documents the findings from a citywide transportation safety analysis that examined crashes involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers.The TSAP describes crash trends and patterns, prioritizes locations for safety improvements, and presents potential safety treatments for locations with the most potential to reduce fatal and severe injury crashes in the City,some of which involve Hall Boulevard.The TSAP identifies potential safety improvements and creates an avenue for the city to pursue ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety(ARTS)and other grant funding to enhance transportation safety. The following intersections were ranked as some of the highest priority intersections in Tigard given their history of crashes and severity: • Highway 99 and Hall Boulevard (Ranked#1) • Hall Boulevard and Durham Rd (Ranked#14) Murraysmith Hall Boulevard Condition Assessment(2020) The purpose of the Murraysmith report was to provide an assessment of the existing condition of assets within the public right-of-way along SW Hall Boulevard,from SW Durham Road to the City of Tigard (City) limits just north of SW Locust Street.This condition assessment addresses the immediate needs and costs to bring SW Hall Boulevard to a "State of Good Repair",with the understanding that the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the City will work towards reaching a jurisdictional transfer of SW Hall Boulevard within the City limits. The report states that deferred maintenance and rapidly evolving construction standards have left much of the corridor needing significant work to bring SW Hall Boulevard to a State of Good Repair.The percentage of assets that need to be brought to a State of Good Repair,that can be quantified, are as follows: 81 percent roadway pavement,98 percent curb ramps,65 percent storm drainage facilities, and the Ash Creek Bridge.To address corridor wide deficiencies and bring Hall Boulevard to a State of Good Repair, it will cost approximately$28.4 million if constructed in 2020. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 61 MEMORANDUM The assessment contains detailed information for Hall Boulevard on the following,all of which serve as an important foundation for the Hall Boulevard visioning project: • Functional Classification and Traffic Volume • Cross Sectional Elements • Future Projects • Pavement Condition • Curb and Sidewalk • Curb Ramps • Stormwater Facilities • Traffic Signals and Flashing Beacons • Illumination • Permanent Signage • Bridges • Right-of-Way • Railroad Crossing Washington Square Regional Center Redevelopment Plan (2021) The Washington Square Regional Center(WSRC) is located at the northern edge of Tigard,the southeastern edge of Beaverton,and the eastern edge of unincorporated Washington County. Recognizing the WSRC's potential for transformative, equitable,and sustainable growth,the City of Tigard led a 2020-2021 project to update existing policies and the original land use and transportation vision.Some recommendations that resulted from this effort relate directly to Hall Boulevard.This project sought to better align future WSRC development with current community needs and aspirations,emerging market trends, and Tigard's goal to be a walkable, healthy, and inclusive community. Key recommendations from the Washington Square Regional Center Redevelopment Plan include: • Explore interest in Oregon "Main Street" designation for Hall Boulevard between Oak and Locust. • Enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and access along Hall Boulevard,through measures such as enhanced mid-block crossings at key locations. • Study the feasibility of a pedestrian and bicycle connection between Hall Boulevard and the future Metzger/Ash Creek park. Fehr& Peers Mobility Solutions Analysis Methodology(Southwest Corridor) (2020) As part of the Southwest Corridor Light Rail Project, significant planning and analysis were conducted on behalf of TriMet and Metro.The Fehr& Peers Mobility Solutions Analysis and Methodology report outlines their demographic and psychographic analyses on accessing proposed light rail stations, one of which was located on Hall Boulevard. Each proposed transit station along the SWC had a different combination of mobility elements Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard 62 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM alto, that suit the unique geographic, land use, and demographic characteristics around the station.The authors then made recommendations on what new mobility elements will best suit each station based on their findings. The report found that among households within 1 mile of the proposed Hall Boulevard Station (which would be located on Hall Boulevard between Scoffins St and Burnham St)there exists a larger population of low-income families and low-income seniors. City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan (2007) The City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan acts as the City's"land use constitution." It is the document that provides the broad policy basis for Tigard's land use planning program and ultimately guides all actions relating to the use of land in the City.The Plan also signals that the City's land use planning efforts will implement state and regional requirements, including Oregon's land use planning goals and related laws,state administrative rules, and applicable Metro plans and requirements. Key findings of the comprehensive plan relating to the transportation system are listed below: • Improving connectivity will maximize the investment in the existing transportation system. • Land use patterns that shorten home-to-work trips,support transit,and make walk/bike trips more viable can help reduce congestion. • High comfort and low stress bicycle and pedestrian facilities are vital to developing at fully functioning network that accommodates people of all ages and abilities plans and requirements. Introduction to the Hall Boulevard Visioning Project Area The Hall Boulevard corridor is an important multimodal north-south route in the city that will play a critical role in connecting downtown with residential neighborhoods and future developments in the Tigard Triangle.The roadway is classified as an arterial street in the City's TSP.The roadway also intersects with key pieces of Tigard's multiuse path and trail network, such as the Fanno Creek Trail and Cook Park. In addition to serving many walking and biking trips, Hall Boulevard is an important transit corridor and freight corridor. Multiple schools are in close proximity to the roadway,such as Tigard High School and Twality Middle School,which makes Hall Boulevard important in serving school-related trips. The visioning project extent,which extends from Locust St to Durham Rd, contains multiple intersections that play a prominent role in the transportation system, including Locust St, Hwy 99, Hunziker Rd/Scoffins St, McDonald St, Bonita Rd, and Durham Rd (Map 1).While each segment of Hall Boulevard has its own opportunities and constraints,the overall roadway can be conceptualized into three segments with somewhat similar land use and transportation contexts: North (Locust St to Hwy 99), Central (c, and South (Fanno Creek Trail to Durham Road). Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 63 Map 1 WASHING -- +.i ir'r_�-' a Y rCrV$0 MI, LOCUST�ST !',--'I 1 II II Il I W[Ey ri RO. 4N.p I r 1{1 II I+ I' 1 lr,4� �g rs > Aii,,,m,. .,..,,_ ,_NIA 4 LEAEST.K, ki x=lr a II II , ��� rd4ENCLEW❑�G ❑ \., sJ •`Y,.„L. CVVD` CVD;;'---- pox 3ft. VPiNE ST •- F CHay.a FLA L?=1W pY _ LJ__JSPRUCE.ST �y � ,�i _. Em s ■ .. n !ill y7A(r m_dRFRPFLE ST• • TIGARD� %I I Y``. `- % d a a1 a f .--. DFRxSEN ' ::, ,tl 2 ' '5`'4„.” -BRYLOR ST bd. �1 Nip a NATURE PARK d� "' y. "'CELL.... ooaRDaaRx CPO ''i 74 . rake vrHST �. 'I �. �WALNUT�s7 — _� f.Ioxt1LL N �-n� 7 `_l If �4- a 4 N f �ERRD sr�-; w'; •ir' �� r 4-✓• "� ,� ]'fli: • 1 Li i]1 • �r ~ pQQ ,,,��� 1D i c-1 V.7 vr" '�"P� L. NrsoL , RD. ►• `� �� Lp , 4.DELLCTrh _ 'F ? Pt PARK y p� �. `� �a:P,aRK•ST: . c '' q ere FANN4 1:1 s VARNS ST �" o s 6,.L a,'y_ CREEK AAF ,� FA/RNAVEN ❑�.� , ,yp !.` `S �. OMARA'STIL J FAIRHAYENr �!�. �,; J ANDD,lkl r tii ,r EMEWOOD STS" Q ,r'1 f OARDEN ,r� ;H�LVl W,S7� 4p AA _ TECH C5NTER OR15 PAt,e01_ i1�!I!I�11 I R 4+pi EST - -- - MCDONALD ST • 1 . III OUNTANy It, �DNZrI :. ,.r yyu ir-.L '?..N!''';,-.,,- ANNU ¢- f•i: q� •a� *� GREENSWARDyi - C- �7. -4'�i�� g., L•1 ��als ii•A ZST n - "I'RLiRY,LHr•A. S rn r i ?ONITA Rh EAST e�I'C'CPO ?- � � 6 � PINT oR'K�� ICV 4M -ER 7 MURDDCK•ST .�.7, �.� i i x giRErU :•1. I ° LADY,fg4P ` ,_ w o sT ,.,. - _ `�`/ 11-41.. rn RIGH OR �, atk 1FI000VIEW •BATTLER ST Affee ii w� 'S •�' f KABLE ST �;SSSE DR .DR yyKEH70N DR +■ , 'u� I �� LAY• C :ELLFLOWER ST+; 4 ■ z 1 r' .. , I;.., ❑ Jr iiii,,,,,,DDR • Ail ST 1 . Rp�n ..,,t,ERFf µidly. 1 yHAMLEY .'a� o�'ws! \ CEN„1.0,OP� !de ?ORD BOND Si I e.,(1..0.7'..`'.:: (Ar ' I [_1_}£ D +RD O 0 0.45 L.S MILEi U PROJECT EXTENT Neighborhood Organization Hall Boulevard CPC 4B BULL MTN 6 School CITY OF TIGARD CPO 4M METZGER School Campus HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY Park if::: City of Tigard alta 64 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX MEMORANDUM ai kid Equity and Demographic Analysis One factor that makes Hall Boulevard a significant corridor in the City of Tigard is that it connects a diverse range of people. In the census tracts that comprise the Central section of Hall Boulevard near downtown and the Tigard Triangle,there are higher populations of lower income households relative to the surrounding neighborhoods (Map 2).These neighborhoods are also where there are higher numbers of households who lack access to a motor vehicle,and therefore may be dependent on other modes of transportation (Map 3).The Transportation System Plan calls attention to this geography as well, noting that while"the percentage of youth under age 18 is fairly evenly distributed across the City,the senior population is heavily concentrated in the southeast neighborhoods between Pacific Highway and Hall Boulevard."Alta's in-house equity analysis tool, which combines a range of indicators from demographic data to tree canopy coverage to economic mobility, returns a result that is spatially consistent with these findings(Map 4). Incorporating equity within the Hall Boulevard visioning project will likely mean specific and intentional outreach to these Equity Priority communities, providing a range of transportation options, and investing in infrastructure that is accessible for people of all ages and abilities. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 7 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 65 Map 2 WA$HINGro ./ LncusT. • HNSpUq MTIGER����44.0.%714 F SCNtPARK .5rd;' - OAK-ST Pi GL "t j ii r I 8L NO,R u �I '!I. n PINE•ST VIT 61A.c 4 r y f,. .,,,5y 1 v74'•i--NORTH DAKOTA Sly aay o�a; ARE a '% r titiw ENgURG pa ¢J x ff TIGARI],p �+ pU 2 A - 11 ❑IRKSEN r 5 :j. s -BAYLCR ST 1- NATURE PARK a 8` I • �g a w ODARUPARK �'ayMFRC SP R77! '_�jD{ :... aRr H•s•r f.. -^I WALNUT ST t '0,..., SONN "� s �i�, a ,S.r PJB ,¢vC�e 'I�- FifRM0S0 F ERRt7 //I ty" ��%• - WAY _. atiR Ci CVlA1[ RSYiAVE BEVEIAHDRD y • fia ,Ea ,� !]UTI}\ DOG a � F? • FONNER • PK C?o PARK '4 y��1� zt , i A 1, lF, 4y -\ �'r2fMo., HAMPTON ST g, \ POTS0 DOS J 4— p DELL CT ¢ T 1r`S�F 0 \PARK 5 z 4 ,p� �7p c /. r� 7 O PAPA % C S C�,`L' CREEK PAC.? VARN$$T Q 6 a n S FAIRNAVEN `�,4;''' p r _ S7 a 'b ¢' OMAR4 ST I J .` OR� FAIRH / V 5AND8lIRG it) GARD �' EDGfw OOD ST Q ST PARK•PL FIILLVIEw S7 p• X TECH }1 CENTER DR AARG• MCDONALO ST - fir 84NlTA PAR WMd1HTAl v WEW F Lly A7yliO CRG l!Q 7 xi GREENSWARD v y o a . ABURYLN 2 g REAST'' •�UEAE MURt!°°LADYAq �GS7 WsN HDoovrm N OR SATTL ER ST 0, i j - _ e '�� x !SABLE Sr a {F$iflf DR KE NTON DR ti d LAS,e..,\.- E�� Y BELLFLOWER ST c �`E,,,�p.TiD DR ORETER AF `c Y ¢ ASHFORD ST SYIhSMERFIfLD DR GRJI 'Y,l-' p 1 HAMLE]'S,T Q‘Nr`,y ti e -1CENTU .* ifi'LBOND ST .Q e RY OP DURHAM RO oAKt - r 17FORD F I• fl/ �� 7 I oa 035 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD U.S.Census Bureau,2019 ACS 5 yr Est. Hall Boulevard INCOME m >$106,000 • Railroad MI $96,000-$106,000 15 School CITY OF TIGARD HALL BOULEVARD ET $78.000-$96,000 School Campus CORRIDOR STUDY $50,000-$78,000 Park alta <$50,000 City of Tigard • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX Map 3 wuIrzc, .1 � =LUgrTa sroUAREIRk = MAPL ELEAF Si �zo oIIIa OAK s-r se dDENGLEWOOD °' r 8001(PARI{ n PINE 57 a �sARsoR 0�V0 DIAM'ONQi, 'SPRUCE SF p� a hpyL �- a r 4' NORTH DAKOTA$7 m M1 / P ` tr-e1L m� Q £N 4 PFAFFLE ST TIGARD Sj VP 2 •�a \ peRYLOR- i'ir I ❑IRKSCN F -1 z a y' NATURE PA RK � �.'� yw �- o y,, 3 Q Si dim\+ ••••PAR •Ca'14E C£h'r s .-_ 'i• 11 r, QA?1.44CtlfH'S7 15 ,,,, , 4_6--,. - i aCsr , S AC a z WALNUT ST .10H � - S}.pori 1/ �,P' HERMOSO t ERRCIL ST OFR e. . . ASN AVEN • Mr17 BEUELa r76 R6� q tNF a 4 DOG _ FDNNCR$Z Pa F:Y2 $ R°RG/C1ay HoN w 1411TH 6 F'Shsy� ko:t,„, ;�RRp '' HA.4PTON ST C ,,HELL CT pG ice/ ,, 7 PARK ST a R c, R��2 A.Cr-6, r- FRNND II\ II y C Z rP% c),. :.NZ R .Sf CRf!K PAF? 55" =FAIR41ApFN p m + itiARKS ST y' if OMAF:4 Si rc � FAERHAVEN� 1/ U J a '!! EDGE WOODS] I SANOSUSS GARDEN PARK PL HILLVIEw ST PT ST �� 1 -... CENTER DR GAAl7nE Si ��MAIMAL O ST 14 t N !MOLINFAIAr 0,,,„ KNITA PAR' FF ! LN NNO CRE o GREEHw RRafINSzsr 0NITAe2)4 K ST PINEEFIS© 111 EBRDGST �m.. � ��r� SUTTLER ST -� } � ■ Q z KAar sT g10E DRa_ 1(EN DR � r 1 LA �4p BELLFLOWER ST� G,,,FOD DRG sµyEA1= Z o 'ASHFORD ST TO a 3GMMERPIELD DR Gj�� �, g 9HAMlErsT , q`� @ d 3: L4, rLv i ¢y�CEN7ilRY00-, pAKt}'E���'4rFpRDOHSa, O iDURHAM RD LN pD/, �� 0-25 OA MILES PERCENT HOUSEHOLDS U.S.Census Bureau, - Hall Boulevard WITH NO VEHICLE ACCESS 2019 ACS 5 yr Est. Railroad School CITY OF TIGARD = 6-950 HALL BOULEVARD _ 3-6% School Campus LL CORRIDOR STUDY Park 0-3% City of Tigard alta 0% HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 67 Map 4 WgSHIN r mires-, p % on, 72G LOCUST ST W i E r NI�Q A . a C MAPLELCAE Sla x x ❑ / S OAK ST m a n dDENGLEWOOD x DL 'K PARK \p, re r.PINE Si a � _aARgIyR B�VO DIoONO, ^ .-r p� �_ SPRUCE ST. Li F• 2,5M -m�d4'� S...NORTH DAKOTA ST ,. r m FryRO PFAFFLE ST ii TIGARD.? a ., ti . DIRKSEN -� = r.,, -y -: RAVLOR 1" NATURE PARK g a 3 IVii.• 4.04 p e.-.0i'•.,1 PAR- `,'Fq E. 'a` RTMDUTH ST 1 �� II l i M i WALNUT ST x a 4 :a:...• e '`:tPo'9 HERMOso r �w ' WR ENROL ST �� 6EVELAND D s ---PONNERS'� PM 1y r •'•t 'Hill i iuTT , . tp.,?, _ HAMPTON Si ¢9ELi CT. A ,� r R AF.„,„(11%, 'e'PARK•S7 a TREE, YARNS ST y. CREEK:. }. a .ice �g _CO p o PAIRHAVEN ^pJ. __ ST s. �A 4 FALRHAVENZ .. .� R SAND8IJRG GARDy+_. w.ei)W Q ST tilI 115 PARI(PL W 11 MEM HI ,5 GAAROE ST —Ti■ Grip ST 'MOUNT/VA,VIEW {_.,-.1.. .;. N ilta .y GREENSWARD o`l:BURYLN iNE25T • .o •7A'. —.1. I .(.• MONDE) K-ST PINEBRp[RC Si 4 i f R4ING ST a N I i 44R rn .,.. pITY `,_m HOODVLEWA DR SETTLER ST m 4,, •a ¢_ ! JJJ x �.0 \L- DR4 KENTON.DR ' f 9�J I i L1� Q. BELLFLOWER ST r ` ND DR�ENLEAI: R2 ;ASHFORD ST �5 TER ym HAA1! SUMMERFIELD DR G S $,� "! '' rsp E' F' 4E � ¢ CENTLRSOPF �I. -! ! I OAK wS � rFOio (ul DURHAM RD LN O - I 025 Fil 0-5 MILES (N EQUITY PRIORITY Equity Priority Areas Half Boulevard AREAS = High Equity Priority Railroad 0 6 School CITY OF TIGARD I 1 School Campus HALL BOULEVARD Low Equity Priority Park CORRIDOR STUDY ` City of Tigard alta • HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM ai kid Existing and Planned Pedestrian and Bicycle Networks Hall Boulevard is a major link in both the planned pedestrian and bicycle networks for the city(Maps 5, 6).The roadway is designated a "pedestrian corridor" and a "major city bikeway"which emphasize the fact that Hall Boulevard currently does,and will continue to,serve a high number of walking and biking trips in the city in addition to connecting residential, recreational, and commercial areas (Maps 5, 7). Hall Boulevard provides a direct route for people walking to and from residential areas to the downtown core or the Fanno Creek Trail system. Currently, Hall Boulevard has inconsistent sidewalk coverage along its extent. Sidewalk quality varies as well, and the inclusion of ADA accessible curbs and ramps is incomplete.The Murraysmith report notes that 98%of the curb ramps along the corridor will need to be updated to bring Hall Boulevard into a state of good repair.The report also found that of the existing sidewalk infrastructure,only 4% is damaged or inadequate.There are multiple trail and multi-use paths that connect to Hall Boulevard but marked crossings are largely limited to signalized intersections. People walking along Hall Boulevard will need to safely cross to other pedestrian corridors identified in the TSP: Locust St, Oak St, Hwy 99, Hunziker Rd, Commercial St, McDonald St, Bonita Rd, Sattler St, and Durham Rd. Hall Boulevard currently has bike lanes along the project extent.These bike lanes vary in width and level of separation, particularly in places where Hall Boulevard curves and where there are dedicated right turn lanes for motor vehicles.The corridor currently lacks other supporting infrastructure such as bike specific signals,turn boxes, and any physical separators such as curbs and bollards. Future bikeway designs for the roadway will need to support bicycle turning movements to and from other major city bikeways, such as Locust St, Oak St, Hwy 99, Hunziker Rd, Commercial St, McDonald St, Bonita Rd,Sattler St and Durham Rd. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 11 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 69 N.WASHING1•94,4:1 Map 5 II fy Tpr, qLOCU$T:STquerykD41+vE S,' PARK �l 7 ---4 o 7�,,, '. a MAPLELEAF ST a z a o t �� a I La f _r . i-OAK:ST�W�a 1I 1 -'--- -- - 1} dDS. E DOD A M1 �w u n PINE S21. / • C I a BARSl5R8Lv0 ,NAY •Ld •-•-‘ :' .-- — I�.r,i PrNCEST—_ M1 -1 ' Oil' pT2 z~` 14 --mowNORTNQAKOTA S � m x li ap � PFAFFLESF� FIGARs - � f t�3r BAOR ST,fY •=tipt l DODApo' '• Eq rFggl, -,RTH , O r�0I17H ST '3 ST i �WALNUTST = 30H yc PER l' " ' ERROL ST gip. +••• '� WAY 1 C` VQ� .'T.y� oW:"-'. f 6EVELRN!]•Ra > If +II!! x �FONNER S. .ppb� Qq• v �'}'�I i Aik�FS,. t `TT kfiR RpA1P.70N ST 167TH CT POTSo • (t, DELL CT = • Q fi. $ 1 POTS y /N\- ■ •,nay o PARK ST¢ , • G �2A, ,i.`"i� a VARNS ST I + ¢ • m ,k.r1:'', Cao • A 1 x FAIFHAVEN P� J"" v R — S.SL N�/P \/ OMARA ST. ,.V s ,. ' / a FAIRHAVEN %' .,2\/ y., m SANDBDRG y EDGEWOCM ST ST fy GARDENAHILLVIEW ST:'• z, T✓=CH f 1 CENTER OR GAARDE'ST MCDONAL'D'ST \ a /7 BDNIT• 'ARK In. + I MOUNTAlry ViEw ,n. ry % L771 t- IN • WING•,c,p, cc,. I• _ y GREENSWARD. ' m oy • - // -.,,„5.,„,,, ¢ } k a LN .,, �, v DRY.LAI o ��INEZ GT # 60N ITA,RD • ii •. °to -MUR000K-ST P P1NEBROCg •'I � a a� GAR 7 g a it _ � R£! } v N I-A°V L. _ v~i l�'�G ST �r ` ,�7 !ON DR 1 �yALTY Fe W H00DVIEW 11 SATTTLER•ST 00 > R a a �.KABLE ST' }DE DR*DR r, �. 2 SFS ,ti !(ENTON DR I Lh b FLL FLOWER ST p ND OR OREEµLaP .E6 ci w=1 A2H OJ D ST .r�' TER,.� 1- o HAMLET '7�, 45. r.SUMMERFIEL94R�4'r a 2 Sr = - 0it it, - a�4 � 80ND ST r' I 1NrL7gy,DAFDURHAM,RD MEP$ Opp~RD � 1l ; 0 0-25 0-5 MILES fO 2040 TSP PLANNED Pedestrian Corridor . =,, Half Boulevard PEDESTRIAN NETWORK !(sidewalk completed on bath —Trail(Existing) sides) Trail(Planned) • Railroad CITY OF TIGARD Pedestrian Corridor Proposed Active B School HALL BOULEVARD (sidewalk missing on one or Transportation Connection both sides) School Campus CORRIDOR STUDY Neighborhood Greenway Park (sidewalk completed on both sides) City of Tigard alta Neighborhood Greenway (sidewalk missing on one or both sides) 70 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX Map 6 Z WASHINGTON 1 ME TZGER LOCUST ST .. Rp 4IRE SCh PARK } a II o �a,I �^ a MAPLEC.fAF ST ¢ Z rt dO� w OAK ST C = E 005 M1 Dkooss4ii : n PINE S7 rrn gAitBtSR gL`� BLACK Aya� - SPRUCE ST n a hyyP. ¢ L T �T yF�, p rz- 1r $7 Pati NORTH DAKOTA ST ' M1 41- £ I PFFAAFFLF ST fi N&U a e 4J it TIGARO,g�. 0.4 rMR y BAriOR ST -tib .- p WOODARO: r• 40f4, 4'..9.5, NORTH 1,� �D+IfH sr .•..�., 7 'RL 3T j°L. c �w0.LNUT ST� SOF7 �i ~ .v 'YPSP ÷ ASH ` N WAy� $ ERROL ST $ AVENUE QA t BEVELAND RD > .V 4 }.,-OUT I 4,yr�DO,PARK �, Qr% pY" `Y ` rw+FONNER• 9.1.'C'''''' y • WC. G 1,,, I ST �`4TR.RO T`` HAMPTON ST /147tH CT $ n POTSO DOG • ]/ ,ti,DEtLCT C $ PARS/ r ~ ,, `. Y'• •0 n VARNS ST __S::.111, m ?a tARK ST 3 G� �. `. �' ..�t m a "'� J a� ti. 3 M1EAIRHAVEN �, [.fir s d S ST Ns' p OMARA ST 2 FRIRHAVEN 3. 0 a.; SANDBURG EOGEWDOD 5T ST [/��J GARDEN HILLVIEW S7 $ T. CENTER DR �'�"•GAAROE-ST MCDONAL'D ST r ROAST\PARK `y r MOUN7A1 w N N viEt !N. FANNO. �. „$fie, y ~GREENSWARD ,'�„ .C4.- '0.., Cy - �q ¢ a k 'Pq a LN �I. v '` 9URYLN R o ~ a� 1NE-2S7 +•+.BONITA•RD. FR � EWT AGE MURDOCK ST p PINEBROOIC' n a, PARK W p V I g e a .. — r4 R5I v $ N LADY Ae._ vi YM1'G ST yr ,{L !ON DR �AL7Ypl�" HOODVIEW - 'SA7'TLERST 40 a LQ i i F (CABLE ST SDE DR ❑R _ _ 2 FS KENTON DR i- 1 LRK 6 `BELLFLOWER ST ,ND OREtyyEAf � i ASHFORD ST SUMMERPIELD OR TER G �e �� ¢ y z liA1ALETsr c _ 4,6. P� a ¢e� CENTIlgV flp`F I,AEP' CyjkTRD BOND ST r' - i .wif I' I 1 0 DURHAM,RO aOp 0 025 0.5.MILES A EXISTING BIKE NETWORK Bike Lane — Hall Boulevard - Buffered Bike Lane S School CITY OF TIGARD Caution Area School Campus HALL BOULEVARD - Multi-use Path Park CORRIDOR STUDY --- Intermittent Bike Lane ; City of Tigard alta HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 71 Map 7 \wAsHINGT ory. I -TZG R �CCCU.ST:ST II sRzry k0flE k'� RK 1l t• �2 o o M _ _ Q a MAPLEC.FAF ST 71' =. a w i I 'OAK:sT_m�ayJ .1 .,". h d0( oar 1 ^PINE 5T ¢ rgARBUR OA SLACK 9d .. f °. r" L=. 14 Or yam " :SPRUCE ST—•. t 7p), q = F' I � _ A -NORTH.DAKOTA ST m ,..,?„,p _PFAGFLE sr PGA, x TlGARo•y.T, _ wAM a f SA ST I V W _T . „cur.. : e,"4gS G RTrI �s O�TMd+ffHsr w WALNUT=GT OY 30H 'rT �-, I +rF�sT p']�' !!!lam• �,.. ''Y� LI-'-'' MERmoso. ! 45" ERRDC ST s�S . \ I a WAyIr .p• QA 1" 1 BEVEtRNRt]-� a ■ur ST_.„ � ir's. �� J i "FDNNER 5.---.9°" / p q, ' �7YyJ A iP, __t I��TkFR.,Q =HAMIPTON ST 107TH LL a / a` I's.. ,s, POTSO RSG DELL CT = f� e" p.9No,Fl PRRICy/!�I LL day a PARK Sr tic--4.,, 0+ l-y i'±i.. �`f' VARNS ST 3 v IpG�v' •Sy. c'� .• z 1 FAIRHAVEN 1 '''-'4-.-v O7 ? _ • 3 s'�SL -.:. N"' '7'.- ,Sr OMARR ST=•y-�J_ •R,. a FAIRFIAVEN S m SANDSDRG— piGARDENPARK PL , HILLVI EW sr J' _ TECH fI f/! l r: CENTER OR GAARDE'ST '. ' MCDONALO:ST I +1MOUNTA1' SONIT• 'ARK N vlEw r. . 1 Liy _FANNp• C� GREENSWARD m dy - �q C a k LN _ 'T "..-„ SNRY LN—� c ~ w -INEZ sT Z�SONITA:RD- '.I iA S jl t • $UTTE MIJRDOCK"57 ,l PINEBROD1C�' I� a a PAR �`j 3 z a v il ..1i ,REki4e sT N ,�7 w LADY 'WON DR m ra pLTY Fe., W HOODVIEW 1 SATTLER,ST 00 > ,1R'` ¢'"kABLE ST—� i LDE DR tiR_j = n g:, Y,FS KENTON DR x J•I 1 LA -.o a” eELI.FLOWER ST W 1 ^ st4LEN n w x ASHFORD ST ,$''''' fes_ = .r' TER'w.>.� o HAMLRT 'x~1I 4.y . Ir SlIMMERPIELD CR.,047) a Z. S�. c _ •CENTLr�,_Op'E M.Y. �7TkORO DONO sT -DURHAM,Roop 0 025 0.S.MILES . - f- . � : r 2040 TSP PLANNED Major Street Bikeway(Existing Facilities) iiHall Boulevard BIKE NETWORK Major Street Bikeway(Planned) Q School CITY OF TIGARD Neighborhood Greenway(Existing Facilities) School Campus HALL BOULEVARD • --• Neighborhood Greenway{Planned} Park CORRIDOR STUDY Trail(Existing) . City of Tigard Trail(Planned) altaProposed Active Transportation Connection 72 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX MEMORANDUM alta Transit Context Hall Boulevard serves two transit lines, Route 78 north of Hwy 99 and Route 76 between downtown Tigard and Durham Rd (Map 8). Route 76 is a frequent route that intersects another frequent route, Route 12, as well as the WES commuter rail station in downtown. Hall Boulevard would intersect with the proposed Southwest Corridor light rail line,which has a planned station between Commercial St and Hunziker Rd.There are 23 bus stops along Hall Boulevard, but many lack ADA-compliant sidewalk and curb ramp access. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 15 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 73 Map 8 �1;;° wAsH ,2,)4". 4ZR I 2 1 •- •LVCUSTST .I • _ ; ,04„ i \ LAEI:r _`NGLEWOflH �� I " '�.:WNF•sT?ARK c. ,. . P SPRUCE ST ' ii�yIL L irr ( r- � 1 n p :_7.: _ 7 I9AKDTAST-- i - ` � —PF4FFfS —y ,,_, ,dQ r1I apr • ._, 1 %. ird �� -? Y 1i , �\ LAA „R:STa1 _-... ..,e. 01RKstN r .��Y 14- I S �� 'x' NATURE PARK )�� v J : -' � , 000A PO PARK ,p, IFSF' -.'• },•77! . ,�QQT'H sT .. b1611.1.�; ..1 p6..L, �- 'T. �- L �WAI.NUT.ST- V s— ,/-+,, J) I�� *�' 4 ST-ST+ �.aSPy�' ' �4 _�w�Y��- �. il gill IS .,.1,,,,,,,6::// '} ! ‘'"44:1-' \ --IBfEVEL'ANO'IiD r[ j FDNNER 4¢r..i' ,pl - HG f} a NfJ' r / Ik �l [ H� OM 107TH CT o �- ParSa gsic 4, 'iz L. I �, -. II�C— DELL CT,Z..''5 II`l .C4,t, O $ PARK 41 �• - 'y FaIPARK-ST¢ G� bR, ' � -* RNs sT - 1 �,-•� e, � 1 3 A q :), CREEKPFRFANNO '� = hifSL a7 1' 1 7fi lJ� ©111--\p f1kFiJL a 1�l����IILkII��II�� IJ 1 s • / 7,_JUL. ... 1 111 FL____ � '1(��} ` J I�,—�. \+ G EDGEWODD ST- -1 HDSDRG ` 1 `IHI PARI(PL--J " HILLVIEW:ST 4y .1 TSH V l U • - JI `� , _ CENTER DR- � ,��� G„i• .,. ,LI MNALD sT�� IL �� r' �L it r", S a J .,k-,-..11 MOUNTA� n (] ,�gONITS?�..v' 0. /. fj� f '} �,thr IFANND It, �_-. L SWARD ,'a ¢ ,,,__R k� �� I LHS; 124-'21 `'LT�7,911RY:CN-&—o� r�P`iNF2`5 l� E+ _ P SONITA'RD I rl 1 it—� �C 11 EAST '••r ERS MIJRDOCM•F� �4 �PIHEBR001C� � g_, � g ���C jy,'�C' ti lil .•=- i_REII �' a ~ 1sr mA �� • 1-� j~c°LADY NoR l L, 71 4 ter' ��1 I[ i �,tL 11 -HOODVI✓:W SA77LER ST f a .,: p1TKpf` Liut s+ ���� � nIiDifs r=4l i I a d rF z=KABI.E ST--. -. �c1DE'OR.:.9R I KENTON DR r iikh, — LI, r ii�,rr SELLFLDWER sT. re; �'� I�.pND ORJ` ENLEAF J�� :2r¢n �J � __���ASHFORD ST ■i I • 4 BM MI- �,j,N' TER y. Lk o �77 1 _ j 5 S }I.AfALE7�=� 7 . q-rj-,1lMMERFIEL9,flR 011 f-. IT '' 2 l ST ct.,_—_]. 7 i . ,,,,•,,,s,', 1 �y ,,,,,_,,,o,,.. .„9i., ORD 1 - LR_I: �iJP- 44111'71 1 0 I a' s-- - DllRHgM RD �.. • TRANSIT CONTEXT RAIL LINE 6 Transit Center Proposed Southwest • Bus Stop Corridor Light Rail Hall Boulevard CITY OF TIGARD — WES Commuter Rail HALL BOULEVARD School CORRIDOR STUDY School Campus BUS ROUTE Frequent Service Park alta infrequent Service Railroad City of Tigard 74 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM aiIP.- kid Vehicular and Truck Traffic As noted previously, Hall Boulevard is designated as an Arterial in the City's TSP.Arterials are designed for higher volumes but tend not to be major regional travel ways. Minor arterial streets provide inter-neighborhood connections.According to the TSP,there are two Hall Boulevard intersections that are consistently delayed due to traffic: Hall Boulevard& McDonald St,and Hall Boulevard & Durham Rd. Although the corridor is needed for freight traffic, Murray Smith reports that truck traffic accounts for 2.9%of the annual average daily traffic(AADT).The maximum annual average daily traffic(AADT) reported by ODOT for SW Hall Boulevard is 17,000,with truck traffic accounting for 2.9 percent of the AADT.According to City traffic count data,the highest traveled segment is between McDonald St and Bonita Rd, due to east-west travel along McDonald St and Bonita Rd (Map 9). Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 17 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 75 Map 9 i� � 794 +.��J�1�-7� ��-R ,���1�..�� rl 331 �� f_!. ... � r'V METZG SCI GD n L. 6 34 1 r' fl 1568 '. J�1 flr _ J i� 2111 4��.�� �� JJI �� 127 1070 �lJ�I ,_„��. ENGIEWO b 5621759 i 1. RK 541• .+ . .� 4 r:f'.11 I —r.. r..--- + {/ ' a. I. r 1575+'853 825s-' .. . 7 � 4tiLi� 2667 ,�` 12 461• rj 4942 = .1`lye! 282 5283 /1 `LIJ� G U” � ��84 ^^ jl. 63845309 _,n.13 X11 2 _./.0.2'. �- 3 it 7..3 J � o+Rxs�nr 1 n1= \11 `v "$6991535822• II \- NATURE 747 4j �. 1+� • r• 12509 572 . 9.8. _,--;-:::-V •. z•� .L -� 9 0,13014_12765 �� .L_ 13013-4 5934 1 - F 80P�q • WOODARD PARK "■r'r; .,; RI( ±� 656 ,/ 529 . ; •3p 13825 J� 8207 ;_,.. I 125 448 16:''' '�'+:, , � , ' �Jza9 •- t • �� 400 LI n F c , r A�` 527• 10441 ter 1300 p 23,7_, 986 71:p AVE•'•wBOG A p� 9 f s - PARV•43' 79 89 r11 LJL I�____I `fI} 104 Pars lip_,,. n' �I : l LJ F. 250 ^,, 5 DOGPI3RK ��f`y J�• 588 PAroNa ,--f�_.1[ ` LI .17Q3 1' •UVJ JJ CREEK PARK I o J[ .3 5 51 - j[I 6_ T71 �J � 0 _ JJ ilai2f-i.: .,„ r'• 6 ��-_.4c404 �L $p 1186 • JJ� 1059 - - J 679 1402:,. 12574 10547 117052115 �, - - 1 1284 594 �. ��# jpp ,1 • 353 720 012994 ;/ } 1 .997 509 sPaPK _`�_ 3237 1565 ��.._ L = __�JJ 470 501 11272 1739712700 17394 143 ' � ?455 1179 — l • [.14716• 7 i.: 6a94_:�STEUTTE1 117245 6 J _I 1259 174 11902 C 1794 393 NERAG 933 6347 nARx 4 1068 1043 i 548 7 ±i_ 793 1279 ���� 2099 EL 4056 4490 474 t� 3190 4572 1472 1843 984 1895 4485 �` a= 1917 1 'A 2170 228 198 / : '1' A9 ! 9665 .' lrir 1,.....n____-_- : 432275 1089 10158 1060 334 426 497 +81438 845 140 2390 408 23• 400 :.'T' :.-� *18760 76618436 219 14583 609 622 16584 1296441 fJ I - I • 788• 117 r w --• ...�• 7 0 025 +�'�yh_ r1.S MILES f� -i} TRUCK ROUTES & Current Average Daily Traffic(ADT) Truck Routes TRAFFIC COUNTS 45- 1300 Hall Boulevard 1301 -3237 Railroad CITY OF TIGARD • 3238-6934 6 School HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY • 6935- 11712 School Campus • 11713- 18760 Park alta .1:::: City of Tigard 76 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM alta Collisions and Safety WINA.Kgia0.alSW y Aura Pin Ammar ° While the highest levels of EPoD Ranges vehicular traffic on Hall Boulevard —8.3.15° - 2.3.6-2 jy•-.. exists between McDonald St and -0.5.22 Bonita Rd,three different areas 07"DF Pans. • 4--<71.,.., stand out when it comes to bicycle Cayliaal7ary and pedestrian traffic: Downtown, _...-0 e "" /\ l'-'4?°,....2\ e the Fanno Creek Trail,and Durham 1 Rd (Map 10).The Transportation ! • ..0 a.. Safety Action Plan (TSAP)found i M• ..^ T' - that these areas also showed some '• i a e of the highest crash rates in the ! I ..,,.. w r—__. city(see figure to the right). i6 1 [I a5 1 1.5Imes The TSAP found that in Tigard, Segment Screening Fig,, pedestrian and bicyclist crashes i Tigard Equivalent Property Damage Only Weighting q� Tigard.Oregon constitute an outsize share of , - KI TELSON &ASSOCIATES fatal/Injury A crashes relative to their overall share of crashes: Among the 61 reported pedestrian crashes (throughout the city 2013-2017),the following patterns were identified: • 46 pedestrian crashes(85 percent)occurred at arterial intersections. • 30 pedestrian crashes(49 percent)occurred in dark,dawn,or dusk conditions(19 in dark conditions with street lights,six in dark conditions without street lights, and five under dusk/dawn conditions). • 36 pedestrian crashes(59 percent)were coded to indicate as a motorist's failure to yield right-of-way. Of those, 18 crashes(50 percent)were right-turning crashes. Among the 65 reported bicycle crashes(throughout the city 2013-2017),the following patterns were identified: • 53 crashes were turning movement crashes. • The most frequent crash types were right-hooks at both signalized and unsignalized intersections. • Right hooks have occurred on Hall Boulevard at the intersection of Hwy 99. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 19 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 77 MEMORANDUM dl �� According to the most recent crash data from ODOT,there have been 8 vehicles that have crashed into pedestrians and bicyclists on Hall Boulevard between 2016-2020(Map 11).These are only reported incidents, however. Contemporary research estimates that about half of bicycle and pedestrian involved crashes are actually reported.1 Additionally, low bicycle and pedestrian crash rates do not necessarily indicate safer roadways; in some cases, unsafe roadways have low crash rates because people are discouraged from walking and biking along them. One of the biggest factors in crash severity is speed.The Washington Square Regional Center plan calls for a speed reduction on Hall Boulevard from 40 to 35 between Pfaffle St and Locust St. 1 A study of bicycle and pedestrian crashes in New York,California,and North Carolina found that only 43%to 67%of bicycle-motor vehicle crashes identified in hospital emergency data were identified in state crash data,while 45%to 68%of pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes were identified(Stutts&Hunter, 1999).A more recent study examining hospital records of traffic crash victims in New York City found similar results:only 50%of pedestrians and 45%of cyclist crash victims could be linked to police crash records,compared to 63%of drivers(Conderino et al.,2017).A study of bicycle-related injuries at San Francisco General Hospital found that,from 2000 to 2009,of 2,504 patients treated for bicycle-related injuries,54.5% were not associated with a police report(Lopez et al.,2012). AASHTO Council on Active Transportation Research Roadmap(July 2021). https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP20-123-02AASHTOCATResearchReview.pdf Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard 78 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX Map 10 WASHING)-04, +P 40 • 4-2 LOCUST ST ` 98 z H 'QU M 2GER 7 m ARE SG}f ARRK a- a 77 g N �^ 54 7 3 a h7APLECEAF ST y = ,g (] ti 5'� IRo1iE' q �W y?,. 1-4 pi r OAK ST: s 4 2 .o i ENGLEWOnng r° r PARK 3 ,- 3.5 :.FINE ST '. F gABguRaLVn SLAe,90 _ R wAv t L -SPRUCE ST 3 R 4 72 78 yy a 23 2Tj a ,i1 fi-.et19 NORTH DAKOTA ST • 2 � 1' 34 84 30 you PFAFFLf GT '34- 4 : x TIGARD sr a 10_.i6 A'` _ 5-�Y.' 46 68 a a 5 9▪ OIRKSEN = a BAYLOR 57 S▪ NATURE PARK a N a 22 L7 I 152 as e5 47 ' 121 r4/ N sr 4$ } ��'rHsr.. 10 23,� AL •'SWALNUT ST W O A D .47.. ¢ 1{y��,88 Ssd' i s • . O 27 3$$ r�r NEwr,rnsa ERROL ST 18 sy. AY i S>F.. •o- 8 32 BEVELANO RD Y ASN AV DOG PARK = FONNER S', 0:00 p12 -34 cy 217(107 43 ,19 'ti�,.h. R❑ HA!{rpiDN ST • 4 107TH CT 41 3 FANNO .s CREEK 4sr3_51 porno Dor, G+ c.4 DERC DELL $ 40,cc4, e. SPARK 82 25A PARK �■- 3 -7 4- (%t, V,PARK ST 9i. �J+� F'45}. 11 —"-41 1 S VARNS ST 4Fes+ FAIRHAVEN x y,< a 2-.A 14 54 9 A < S7} b �. Sw 4° 11 a FAIRHAVEN RP U`? m SANQBURG Napy If EDGEWOOD Si E 5T , TECH 15 CAl � HILLVIEW 5i 6 CENTER DR GAAROE ST 111). 33 ii.- 20 MCDONALD ST 24-o -16 �r 11 EONITA PARK 4 MOIJNTArp VIEW `� } LAr FAIJNO C �- O ; GREENSWARD M1 ¢ L" A e: 13 9 FfiBURY w E. 2 INEZ sr 19-sem 24 • 21-ifL 55 ,SBONITA RD is EAST 8 36 a - BUTrE HERITAGE )II 4 � PINEBROOK . 15 a Sw PARK 7 y135 a I 3 `Rellnycsr LADY 34 R 4, r �yAL7Y N0555 WaH QR 9 i EATTLER ST 25-�#-35 °° > > .,..Lr 4 kABLE ST {DE DR 9R = I • z 'K5 q- REM-1.°N DR a Lp'!- d BELLFLOWER ST DDR AF 'r Y U ASHFORD Sr ,,f0" GETER o 13 y., z _ a SUMMERFIEL9 DR OR .3q¢ .� � �4 HS7"T q Q.k-S' r 138 a�� • tig$° CErrrm 01••• �' YS 38 51 IF : BOND sT^ - 1 14e I 17- P DURHAM RD el 48 4w 6610_55 X23-oh 0 0-25 0-5 MILES MOST RECENT BICYCLE Bike Count Pedestrian Count Hall Boulevard Study Area AND PEDESTRIAN COUNTS ' 1 ' 1 Q School • 5 • 10 School Campus CITY OF TIGARD • 10 • 50 Park HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY • 50 • 100 � Railroad • 1001 000 City of Tigard alta HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 79 Map 11 ------ :4,.S>7U M�7LfiEIJ LCCUSh57 nn 1i1�' '"' 11-0a �/�`�� \ROryYYm .. • IIAAE S FIgi;F. ii �r 'I1 'Ei& „,_,.c.,. a N a'^ , .1 4'.—�-�r- --,I-MAKELEAF ST 4 ti -.. `—dO a 4 1 OAK'ST - ',- c z c e �`� ENGLEWOJ� 'M ?' x ^� -, ! qRKn PILAF.ST ¢ gL'ro BIAClt0'Aty7p-'`rte �'.= .I•, ' SPRUCE ST r( s i yf, -1I J �J Her 0 0 '11` lr 41 ,,1 "J 4 �] �P 11. .I NORTH.DAKOTA$T by r m a' _ P �L e� -J for S Y4{ Oce O 7 PFR r}I F or '�I�JLL JI L`1 l4' EN ORIL.',' I Cii Q ' - !� aIRICSEN if_r"). t a f '-. 4,..< LSAIROR sT - ! INATURE PARKJL= '' , nom q`yy7 e1 IIlijiIll, N.,./...tax 007ARD PARK F A .. N�':'N ST,' ti '7 n `7�:RCY4(f sr ee.A. IA! `• . .oLS '•,'` g ff (t �: �� 1 YfALN11T ST x-- /SOh} *C ,. a 1' [ {�-ERROL ST 'j � •��� A �) LbLt '14 '... /bA -• r �! „/O 0 FI 1111 FCF ,�nELLGI z pt%1r�� .ysh'o�{0 FANNO PARK y"+ \ �F 4 "Pel, '°/Gy, $ NARK$T 9 �� . 4 CREEK PARK � z-VARNS ST t • Lar �r}� r� E 44 k a ' t] v F FAIR4IAVEN � ®� ..' .�, pS tea," �8 �� ���' ' -p r' .ST.� N•` �h� �-OMRRR ST. j V U T ijir,Jfr 11/ Fr FRI R R AVE �qn \f SAItlQBURG >ry,.d o �f —=• Sr TECH 'SI, l�. \x� i T a• HIL LVIEW ST A to _ j_ �, y}.[� cCEHTER OR ,ARV+'R.. _ GiRE Sr h9CO0NAl.p;T r_-- Ark 1,,.. KM n !l F .00,4i.,,„„..„,,,,„ ARK ip „:„..,/,e, '� toy fRvh'D (:,..0 Q a GRFFNSwARri 1—` R..1 y . 4.Cq • L. � 'NiRF LN r' n� a a 0 'FOORY LH rr ti P P INFZ O i " BDN Th R J - , EAST 6 `� J +*` If �C E'f''. E MUFDOCAGT RINFRRDDR�F I� ii JL �17 tl: J ! I S* 6 1. I yL ��,VI �: YRFI� !^ 'W ..I r a ._-_.. RE.,,,,,,G,.,51 a ' LADY:411/40N 1:4 r-'!'.;1 .1 .} Nr�:.0 -- --�.,. ,yL w=HGODVIfW� SATICLR Sia w - I! � O{hL7Y pr 1 ry ¢ 4 , F C KABLE ST---: {',]FGR R z +Z 'I - z LAKE+ .r K[Ni❑PJ DR m ,f ^. � O Bal l FI C]4VFR ST . i+':. U \GHLp]dD DR GREiAILCAf r' n m ]'�.!-���Jlf_LLASH ioRD sri r l �rj� �taUMMERElEL9iDRyg.aa] _ ''S 1 j s { 6 U j Ij II OO1l l � Il Dc.� 4e , �I,NiUFryoR'�- P' Grp BOND ST ("- i ::�� DURHAir}:RD - •- ��pa'b 0 0-25 0.5 MILE`, lr-lJ Irk 47,x"i '1 n f �I1 A 0 VEHICLE CRASHES WITH 0 Bicycle Crash Hall Boulevard PEOPLE WALKING AND 0 Pedestrian Crash • Railroad BIKING 2016 - 2020 Q School CITY OF TIGARD School Campus HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY Park City of Tigard altaSource:Oregon Department of Transportation 80 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX MEMORANDUM I _ ai kid Key Development Areas One of Tigard's strategic priorities is to create a well-connected pedestrian network that links all Tigard residents and businesses.The land use map on the following page demonstrates how Hall Boulevard connects residential areas to commercial areas, particularly those in the downtown core and the Tigard Triangle (Map 12).The changing land use throughout the corridor helps to break the project extent into three conceptual sections: North (Locust St to Hwy 99), Central (Hwy 99 to the Fanno Creek Trail),and South (Fanno Creek Trail to Durham Road).The juxtaposition of the industrial areas to the east of downtown to the downtown commercial district/the Fanno Creek recreational areas to the west and south contributes to mixing large trucks with people walking and biking in those areas.To the north,there is interest in potentially designating the mixed-use areas along Hall Boulevard an Oregon "Main Street" between Oak St and Locust St according to the Washington Square Regional Center Redevelopment Plan (2021). Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 23 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 81 Map 12 wwwr F47 ... E._-__r� II / t! 7 ff n .o y f..G. - y LaCusryMF. .. 3 1ROy� ARE a' 1 a 1 2 a o 3A ¢^ 11 caf1C MAPLELEAF$T a ❑ 99 If,�OAK.SIT.- o a 'O m Se d�ENGL c'3 ` 2 t) r ^ w PAF - o'er ` IL r~�..PINE ST N •DA '8L4D BLACK4 7p - 11� � : 10001 WAY yo - _ . SPRucE ST .1 n� 4 .----4Ari...." .i:-.--''''''' _IE- Lr' g p-74' NORTH DAKOTA'$T . 6Y-). a c �wot,'g NgURG LL€ST m TIGARD ST aD I.- F z a 6"' v _ - �r NAiiiiiiT�� ' 9 DR KSEN 5.' z I •� NATfJR✓=PARK or, ��;� . p WOODARD PARK � Fq�, TERSE J .! �`ry� DA '�'�117N 5 F'—�� - . Ell : .-.... • . ..:•• WALNUT ST = SOyy /+: • ERROL 5T t� - '£A WAy R Cr •+k,':. • �� BEV•EL4ND Olt a • EDNNER SS PAS y, 1: I' . ',� HG H. - - J --'. W1,r,24-„i,1:5. . .,,.. T+,. • NrkRD i a, l I( . 107TH CT .W • dpi g,.: + Pq C]f]OG 1 �L-..J � DELL Ci , _:.G+,,, -� Yz+ 6?-, q,SHay PR' v \ ,I 7j- �%a4..� a PARK ST a car' Y .(f1R FA ., n VARN5 ST mi,► 1�z :j /ro '1-2�� S��n '�SANQBLIRG I ' GARDEN EDGEW0001T TECH SA ` © PARR PL HILLVIEW Si A llfl z �y CENTER QR ' ,_ GAARpE ST. MCQOkALD ST _ rIONITA PARK X MOUNT LINVIEW n Sy w:Q— _______ '¢ N �-sk71 �D„de, I w GRFFN55.1ARIl y O ¢ a 4 LI LN 0 x [1'y IMP �tBURY LN ¢ g p rn 1N E2 5' BONITA RD. . W li _i—;_.._ ir EAST 2' rg BUTTE HERITAGE MURDOCK ST PiNFRRDOR`' ¢ _. .• PARK 0 IL. a q a H YRF711 C 'I tr LRQY 44 _ 'VG 51 1 m ,�L c`n R7ON DR ■ �yALTY Pf-"- LA HOSDVIEW SATTLER ST 00 a. _.,;r' d r F KABLE ST 1oF DR GR z r Z � .r FEN DR � LAY' �� Ob 8EIIFI OWER ST alOH�pS1Q OR C.REENLEAF 44'x2, I � ASHFORD ST L TERN V o ! M1RWL✓=7 7 5`� SIJMMERFIELD 9R GR �4 '4S a I- r S, a ael: k- z ti¢�14- CENTURy p0.'F' MC C,rFORD DONS ST^ I F? (�) 1 DURHAM RD Ole !t 0 0.25 0.5 MILES LAND USE CONTEXT Zoning Group [—}Hall Boulevard Study Area = Commercial 45 school CITY OF TIGARD Industrial HALL BOULEVARD School Campus CORRIDOR STUDY = Central Business District Park = Parks and Recreation City of Tigard Residential alta m Mixed Use/Tigard Triangle 82 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM alto, Right-Of-Way According to Murraysmith,the current right-of-way width along SW Hall Boulevard are a 100-foot width south of Pacific Highway/OR 99W, and a 76-foot width north of Pacific Highway/OR 99W.The vast majority of the street length (91 percent)does not meet current standards for right-of-way width. More than two-thirds of the street length (68 percent) has a right-of-way width that is significantly(more than 10 feet) less than the standard. More than half of the roadway length does not have enough right-of-way space to provide the basic facilities(such as sidewalks)that would be expected in an urban corridor such as this. Map 13 shows the estimated widths of publicly owned right-of-way based on tax lot data,completed in ArcGIS. Note that these widths are not exact and have not been measured by a surveyor.The map is only intended to provide an approximation of the right-of-way along the Hall Boulevard corridor. (In addition,the gaps in the measurements are the product of the analytical process used to derive the widths,which does not measure at intersections.)The map shows how right-of-way availability varies considerably along the Hall Boulevard corridor.The most constrained areas along the corridor are shown in red. Generally speaking,the widths follow a similar pattern to the North-Central-South conceptual breakdown of the roadway.The central section near downtown is particularly narrow where Hall Boulevard curves and crosses the railroad. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. 25 City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 83 Map 13 4‘..'D �7 , C WAShI[e1 f:1t R,�_r. _ .. S F t Z SODA:G�'�N IOh;UST til 1 kc a 6 _ a MAPLELEAF S7 d :1 V. OAK ST a n ea ', . �` A PINES[ N 5A4L9i]kpGVO 'a r BLAI:Y'p `t.. y - .. - .•SPRUCE'S-F c• . K'AY 1 Qy Y i rry , NORTH DAKOTA T y_ l 1 ? v a /l x r i ��` ._ Y= , r D m y I OAvt DR ST A 'r r. c�ti ;":01-ESO!',,a '4. t. 81-04 r. /� vY'�rL .442.e'''''''..4 rErvs ART.NC�KT' Z rte. OWN Si �, fy7 7pr�, -1S. 'A[ n SOHO MI.NUT ST ❑ yu^ , a� per l LHiiVL S I' �pP '•VAY n LLI a y ,_ . FOtJNER ST V7• 41...4., ., .%-''' Y DOG: ,Sp� I4 1 ,'•.FH W �S�C,, 'C� 4173,s,fez, HAggpTCJN ST 1 . !I {.FELL CT v¢i l F 5 • rN '1 2 ' kE'ry y ' S 1JJ 0 4 PARK S I 0' g S ^:1„.-- <C 1g Y YAi4NS 57 v. w W T C 5❑ G S'T Ni..:-:' •-, r � ¢T }�.R g �i f: c FAiR''AVF.N i y- f'q ST 2. s P ❑MAJUA ST w o ❑ P i ~FAIRHA'.i �iP 3-' m r oR GARDEN .\' Ok fi. EWGSWOODSI J i •+ .- { PARI(NI" ISI LLVIEW ST A Q TECH S,1F1 L'S is1C1 CENTER DP GMP[JE S f MCOONALf)S1 aJ 1 LU V7Fw LN a, "IVTSO-[`rr .' ¢ %. uu.. GRLE NSLVAi;L1j fi r�= - r Thi � 0 IN R lF Pte- ❑ rNLl Sf E .49i1RY'Lta i i BONIFARD i. o M:IRCCC+CI i $ ST pi NE BRCO K i Y 6 + C ---Aar MAW° i_REiI a G OR i, N 1A4z ST I v O,[(;l TY}"f'1 w HDO4]VIEWO YATTIER ST V • ; KAEILE ST ]1 \Dt❑H A[l�5 p a.1- ;" EI1#I OYER S' HEN a H I 1 ,Nil❑k :;tif Etii E7.F '2 Z O 5[;i�# .4S1iF[.7Hn S I Gr F: 1ERZ R00-U D9-5u'_' 0 w TGO!'.._ - Z• A $[1Ms,'e y y 2 HAMI E f aE' -,,, f0A•Y .4 , S ST O''9-0 9Lfi �� CENfu ASO F rn f BOND SI - 3 ....:4...P F7Y O (1AK b'[Fr rA7 F�Z[) 1 OURHA0.c RD [I9 -0,0 - ¢ 0 025 0"5.1.1I1,ES RIGHT-OF-WAY Right-Of-Way Width (Ft) Hall Boulevard OPPORTUNITIES 50-62 — Trails & CONSTRAINTS Railroad 72 ET Publicly Owned ROW CITY OF TIGARD 6 School HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY — 82 School Campus alta Park 110-134 City of Tigard 84 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM ai kid Opportunities and Constraints The Hall Boulevard corridor is a critical connection in the City's transportation system. It is heavily utilized by many different types of travelers,for different trip purposes,along a range of frontage and land use contexts. In examining the existing conditions of the roadway, it's apparent that improvements are needed for Hall Boulevard to meet arterial standards.Among the many constraints that emerged in our analysis, many opportunities are also present that offer the potential for Hall Boulevard to be premier active transportation corridor within the city's existing and planned networks. Constraints • Currently,the roadway lacks complete infrastructure for all users.Gaps remain in the sidewalk network, both in terms of missing segments and the provision of ADA accessible curb ramps. Most existing sidewalks are 6ft wide and do not have a landscaping strip separating the walkway from traffic,which reduces the level of comfort for people walking. More recently installed sidewalks,such as those between Langtree St and Ashford St,are 8 ft wide and are more comfortable.Sidewalks on the east side of Hall Boulevard between Ross St and Murdock St have landscaping strip separation but abruptly end before reaching the bus stop to the north. • Improving sidewalk connections(and expanding the roadway footprint generally) may be more costly in areas with significant grade differences,such as the ditch north of Sattler St on the west side,and the low- lying areas around the Hall Boulevard/Bonita Rd intersection. • Despite serving the frequent service Route 76,some bus stops along Hall Boulevard remain inaccessible to all users.These stops include the intersections of Murdock St and McDonald St(northbound). • With the exception of the Fanno Creek Trail Crossing and the RRFB just north of Hwy 99,the only marked crosswalks exist at signalized intersections.The distances between these crosswalks range from roughly 900 ft(Wall St to the Fanno Creek Trail crossing)to well over a half mile(north of Hwy 99).The lack of crossings for people walking and biking limits the east-west connectivity of these networks at Hall Boulevard. • A few intersections that already have marked crosswalks with signals have documented concerns regarding safety.These include the Fanno Creek Trail, Hwy 99,and Durham Rd. • Hall Boulevard has complete bike lanes along the project extent, but these lanes are insufficient except for the strongest and most fearless of riders.The bike lanes range from 4-6 ft, buses mix with bike lanes at all stops,and there are three notable floating bike lanes that cross right turn pockets:the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Bonita Rd,the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Knoll Dr,the southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Burnham St,and the northbound/southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Hwy 99. Each of these conditions contribute to a less comfortable environment for people biking. • Available right-of-way appears to be most constrained in the central section, between Hwy 99 and the Fanno Creek Trail. Proposed bikeway facility types may need to be different in this section than the North and South sections.Tradeoffs will be difficult here without expanding the available ROW because the downtown area is a critical area for transportation connections and should have some of the most robust facilities for all users. • In addition to the more detailed constraints above,that the visioning project will need to account for the following factors that add complexity to Hall Boulevard: o The east-west traffic needs between McDonald St and Bonita Rd. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX 85 MEMORANDUM d 1 o The sensitive environmental context around Fanno Creek. o The railway crossing between Burnham St and Commercial St. o The offset skew of the Hunziker St-Scoffins St-Hall Boulevard intersection. o The inter-jurisdictional nature of Hwy 99/Hall Boulevard and the Highway 217 Crossing. In these locations,the Hall Boulevard visioning project will likely need to focus less on design specifics and more on recommendations for ODOT. Opportunities • That Hall Boulevard connects parts of the city with distinct land use contexts is a strength of the corridor. Increasing multi-modal connectivity between residential areas and commercial districts would greatly improve the corridor's ability to serve different trip types and users as well as fulfill City goals. Hall Boulevard has the potential to connect people to parks,schools,the Tigard Public Library,City Hall,the WES commuter rail,the future SWC light rail,Washington Square, and the Tigard Triangle. • The Hall Boulevard visioning project is highly relevant to the interests of downtown Tigard.Collaborating and coordinating with the ongoing Downtown Reimagined project presents an opportunity to improve public engagement. • Completing sidewalks on both sides of Hall Boulevard is a significant opportunity for the city's pedestrian network,which designates Hall Boulevard as a major pedestrian corridor. • One opportunity that Hall Boulevard presents is to build on a current strength of the corridor: inter- neighborhood biking and walking trips.Along Hall Boulevard,there are many neighborhood cut-through paths,which increase the east-west connectivity for people walking and biking.These paths could serve as natural locations for mid-block crossings between signalized intersections. Potential crosswalks could include those at: Bonaventure Ln,Ashford St,and Bellflower St. • Other potential crosswalk improvements that emerged from the existing conditions analysis include the north leg of McDonald St/Hall Boulevard and the north leg of Omara St/Hall Boulevard. • For the Fanno Creek Crossing,there are multiple opportunities to improve the safety for people walking and biking. One or more RRFBs may be more effective than the existing pedestrian hybrid beacon. Depending on the bikeway design,curb extensions may be possible to reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians.There may also be space for a refuge island. • The future bikeway along Hall Boulevard has the potential to create safe connections to other major links in the bicycle network. First,the future Fanno Creek trail extension on the southeast corner of Hall Boulevard/Durham Rd will need to be accommodated in the visioning plan. Durham Rd,Sattler St, Bonita Rd, McDonald St,Commercial St, Hunziker St,Oak St,and Locust St are all designated major street bikeways. Bike turn boxes and advanced queuing facilities should be considered at these intersections to help people riding bikes make turns to and from those corridors. • For a high-traffic arterial like Hall Boulevard, bicycle facilities for people of all ages and abilities will need to be as protected and separated from traffic as possible.Some segments, like in the South section of the corridor, may have enough available right-of-way to install protected bike lanes through lane width reduction and elimination or reduction of center turn lanes. In more constrained areas,we may need to look for solutions that raise the bicycle facility's grade, potentially combining with walkways in a shared use path Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard 86 HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT I APPENDIX MEMORANDUM dl tvrod design. Intersections such as McDonald St, Bonita Rd, Durham Rd, Oak St and Locust St in particular should be examined for their ability to accommodate a fully protected intersection. • The section of Hall Boulevard between Langtree St and Ashford St is particularly wide. If the rest of the corridor isn't widened to match this width,then the extra space here could be repurposed into a more highly protected bikeway,stormwater catchment basin,or both. • Several right turn pockets could be reevaluated as part of the Hall Boulevard visioning project.These include the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Bonita Rd,the northbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Knoll Dr, and the northbound/southbound approach of Hall Boulevard/Hwy 99.The most likely of these to be eliminated would be at Hall Boulevard/Knoll Dr. • The most constrained area is the Central section between the Fanno Creek crossing and Hwy 99. Expanding right-of-way between Burnham St and the railroad may best come from the City's public works property. • There is a significant amount of space on the Hwy 217 bridge that could be repurposed for more protected biking and walking facilities. Alta Planning+Design,Inc. City of Tigard HALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR VISIONING PROJECT APPENDIX 87 NN. • r , 1, 1 ! "^ly. • . '.jr r y4f • 1 t.;-;.-..: 7.,-;-,--: +4`.." :..- _.,„,,,.....:.--.7.,-; `. � • '"1, isiff i " lrik., _ bf , 9 ' yva' • - 5`.,' f. 4t '+ ' - • �• f• '` ;E 4.— , -:-.00,„,. - `•:t �, ' . �'•i.4'i,14,:-. ts. �i�wt�✓ I l' t r l' i l ; l',,'-'"'.-.;.;, ';.',;?.,:0,,..� ',may_."' 4''',47-.:p. N f • i • •i f• 4 R ;Pt t Ka r �A o :. ~o lea -;•'.;;7-17,1't--i4.,4.4; dk.' .L - j'' i i { `a.,t4a•,+.- -.- "mow 9w., .a,y, l'A' .'' . Az ' . Z ..:- •••• ' '''-,:: -!-,..Y.1 . 0 .:-"k. 1."-' __. ' - . pii*,,,,.. ,../.7_,. :- ,„ toor J. ,„, i - _�1. i. •�A4•',,tq, . . S . - =ter' ,. ` %6. _- 1 ` 1 t _.e ..1. :i -i Cil+yd`'fr _ - �� r- _ .. 4 , �,,�.l 0. et,t !. - .�. - • , , _ ....,,,_ _,,.... , .. . .. ..,40. i• r-4 N. tit e ti elpikI1 0 CITY OF • • Tigard