HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit (4) ��++ Hpp�� . pzo.2 — 00191
���'v� 6.ivP�
•
u z 96gD SW Sumni6ferla D Die
MILLER
RECEIVED
CONSULTING JUL 2 7 2022
ENGINEERS CITY OFTIGARD
BUILDING DIVISION
SUPPLEMENTAL STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
Maintenance Building Remodel
9690 SW Summerfield Drive, Tigard, OR
Summerfield Civic Association
June 24, 2022
Project No. 211167
9 pages ititil
Principal Checked:
5,vkUCTURq
nally,5"ea by
E"e..�,,,, 51043
Eric WaIsong=„,IGITALLY SIGNED
REGON o
c,�aie zox aaxe QG �
�'\1:/s...."91' 2 3 c30�
EXPIRES: 06-30-2024
*** LIMITATIONS ***
Miller Consulting Engineers,Inc.was retained in a limited capacity for this project. This design is based upon
information provided by the client,who is solely responsible for accuracy of same. No responsibility and or
liability is assumed by or is to be assigned to the engineer for items beyond that shown on these sheets.
9600 SW Oak Street,Suite 4001 Portland,Oregon 97223 1 503.246.1250 1 www.miller-se.com
Building Code: 2019 Oregon Structural Specialty Code
Soils Report: No Soils Report by: Dated:
Soil Bearing: N/A PSF Retaining Walls: No
Equivalent Fluid Pressure(active): N/A PCF Passive bearing: PCF Friction:
Structural System: Other.Non-Structural Component Anchorage
Vertical System: N/A Lateral Sys: N/A
Element 9,000 LB 2-Post Lift
Load Type
Basic Design Value(PSF) Reactions per manufacturer
Loads: Load Type
Value(PSF)
Deflection Criteria
Lateral Design Parameters:
Wind Design: N/A Wind Speed(3 sec Gust): N/A MPH
Exposure N/A
Importance Factors lw= 1.00 IE= 1.00 Is= 1.00 I,= 1.00 Risk Cat: II
(ice) (seismic) (snow) (ice)
Design Summary:
The following supplemental structural calculations are for the anchorage and footings of a new 2-post lift to be
installed in an existing maintenance building. These supplemental calculations are to supersede the original lift
footing and anchorage calculations as the lift type has been revised.
The new lift meets the criteria of the American National Standard "Automotive Lifts- Safety Requirements for
Construction, Testing, and Validation" ANSI/ALI ALCTV, in conformance with the standard specified in Table
3001.3 of the 2018 IBC.
AMILLER Project Name Maintenance Building Remodel Project# 211167
CONSULTING 11111 ENGINEERS Location 9690 SW Summerfield Drive, Tigard, OR
Client Summerfield Civic Association
Dona d.OR 972230 503.246.1250
iller se com By SAV Ck'd 'A) Date 6/24/2022 Page 1 of 9
CHECK REVISED LIFT FRAMING CLEARANCES
ORIGINAL LIFT DESIGN CLEARANCES:
11'5 5I8"
1 1 1 1
I ❑ i I El
I
1 1 I I
(N)3'-8'SO x 14'DEEP FTG WI(8)
#4 BOTTOM BARS 3"CLR EA WAY (N)2-POST MOWER
SERVICE LIFT DBO
(E)LIFT PIT,(N)POST STYLE LIFT TO i
BE CENTERED OVER(E)UFT PIT
Alla . �
, 1041111101116,___ Illiiti_
AI
(N)A-F
FRAMI
%VNP. /
--- I i 7 lk.../116.-
�� J I I (N)FINISH TO MATCH(E)
e
_ ,•
Io ARCH(
I I (5)yg.
EMBEI
OUTLINE OF REQUIRED
CLEARANCE FOR UFT I Iy
I (CONC
PRIOR
I I
/ — H \
1 3W 1
B'-0" 14'_2'
EMILLER Project Name Maintenance Building Remodel Project# 211167
CONSULTING ENGINEERS Location 9690 SW Summerfield Drive, Tigard, OR
Client Summerfield Civic Association
9600 SW Oak St#400 503.246.1250 �n�� �
Portland,OR 97223 miller-se.com By SAV Ck'd F- Date 6/24/2022 Page 2 of 9
CHECK REVISED LIFT FRAMING CLEARANCES CONT'D:
NEW LIFT DESIGN
Model XPR-9S
Style Chain-Over/Adjustable Width H
SKU# 5175390 B B
Lifting Capacity 9,000 lbs.(4,082 kg) E 1N
A-Rise 72"(1,829 mm) D p
B-Rise+Pad Only 78"(1,981 mm) P l P
A
C-Max.Lifting Height 80.5"(2,044 mm) K I fit' — K
EP
D-Min.Height+Pad 4.25"(108mm) - t`
E-Height Overall 113"(2,870 mm)
F-Width Overall 132"(3,353 mm)-145"(3,683 mm) 1 A B C ij
G-Outside Columns 126.75"(3,225 mm)-139.75"(3,555 mm) D
H-Inside Columns 105"(2,667 mm)•118"(2,997mm) amill L - � ' I
I-Drive-Thru Clearance 93"(2,362 mm)-106"(2,692 mm)
J-Front Arm Reach(MIN) 28.5"(724 mm) F
0
J-Front Arm Reach(MAX) 47.5"(1,206 mm)
K-Rear Arm Reach(MIN) 28.5"(24 mm) )� ' ‘
K-Rear Arm Reach(MAX) 47.5"(1,206 mm) "��1
l_ 1 tIL
.111
Screw Pad Adjustment 1.75"(44.5 mm) I I�2 >I 1 r'T—aE4
il
Max.Load per Armoti 2,2S01bs:(1,021 kg) ,`-
L-Floorplate Height 1.75"(44 mm '*(0 .i10
M-Floorplate Width y 8.5"(216 mm
Time to Full Rise 45 seconds
Noise . .` 45 dB
Motor 220 VAC/60 Hz/1 Ph
Lift location: centered over (e) lift pit, no change OKAY
Length of framing clearance, 8'-0" to 8'-0", no change OKAY
Height overall: 10'-8 1/2" (128.5") to 113", clearance height adequate OKAY
Width overall: 11'-5 5/8" (137.625") to 132" - 145", truss bays at 24" OC OKAY
PROPOSED NEW LIFT WITHIN FRAMING CLEARANCE TOLERANCES ESTABLISHED BY ORIGINAL
LIFT DESIGN
. MILLER Project Name Maintenance Building Remodel Project# 211167
lbNGINETING
ENGINEERS Location 9690 SW Summerfield Drive, Tigard, OR
Client Summerfield Civic Association
9600 SW Oak Si#400 503.246.1250
Portland,OR 97223 miler-se corn By SAV Ck'd s') Date 6/24/2022 Page 3 of 9
ANCHORAGE REQUIREMENTS
NEW LIFT CAPACITY = 9000 LB, PREVIOUS DESIGN FOR 7000 LB LIFT
28% INCREASE, INCREASE REACTIONS BY 28% FOR UPDATED ANCHORAGE AND FOUNDATION CALCULATIONS.
(SEE ORIGINAL CALCULATIONS FOR REFERENCE, NEW ANCHORAGE DESIGN SUPERSEDES ORIGINAL DESIGN)
ECCENTRIC FOOTING ANALYSIS (ASD)
2-POST LIFT FOOTING
P = 4.954 kips allowable applied load M
M = 8.435 ft-kips allowable applied overturning P
B = 4 ft footing width
L = 4 ft footing length t-
H = 14 in footing thickness
1.
CI = 12 in depth to bottom of footing B
PcoNCRETE= 150 pcf concrete weight
Psoa= 125 pcf soil weight
PNET = 2.800 kips increase from footing weight 4ai^ �„ax
P' = 7.754 kips = P+PNET Casa '
LI.
e = 1.09 ft = M/P' cirnIn
Case 2: e > L/6 �,ax
gmax = 1417 psf = 2P'/(3B(L/2-e)) Casa z�
i 4,
groin = 0 psf a
L' = 2.74 ft
2, soa
32
gALLOWABLE = 1500 psf m22 •P` ,., 941 „x_ „
tooI.
ncrease for short term load —
,• • • •
gALLOWABLE = 1500 psf 82
*et
Utilization = 94.5% OKAY
255
I Use 4 ft x 4 ft x 1.2 ft deep footing I zPL
rn
-
• •
32
11‘. 115
s,
L 'Pt
i i
A p % I9*
Li..
Project Name Maintenance Building Remodel Project# 211167
Art MILLER
MbCONSULTING
E GINEERS Location 9690 SW Summerfield Drive, Tigard, OR
Client Summerfield Civic Association
9600 SW Oak St#400 1 503.246.1250
Portland,OR 97223 miller-se.com By SAV Ck'd -P'") Date 6/24/2022 Page 4 of 9
141`TI
Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.78
www.hilti.com
Company: Miller Consulting Engineers Page: 1
Address: 9570 SW Barbur Blvd#100,Portland, OR 97219 Specifier:
Phone I Fax: I E-Mail:
Design: Lift Anchorage V2 Date: 6/24/2022
Fastening point:
Specifier's comments:
1 Input data
Anchor type and diameter: HIT-HY 200+HAS-V-36(ASTM F1554 Gr.36)3/4 1111M4MEME1111111
Item number: 2198031 HAS-V-36 3/4"x12"(element)/2022791 HIT-HY
200-A(adhesive)
Effective embedment depth: ==9.000 in.(he limit=-in.)
Material: ASTM F1554 Grade 36
Evaluation Service Report: ESR-3187
Issued I Valid: 5/1/2021 13/1/2022
Proof: Design Method ACI 318-14/Chem
Stand-off installation: eb=0.000 in.(no stand-off);t=0.500 in.
Anchor platen: Ix x ly x t= 19.000 in.x 20.000 in.x 0.500 in.;(Recommended plate thickness:not calculated)
Profile: no profile
Base material: cracked concrete,2500,fc'=2,500 psi;h=12.000 in.,Temp.short/long:32/32°F
Installation: hammer drilled hole,Installation condition:Dry
Reinforcement: tension:condition B,shear:condition B;no supplemental splitting reinforcement present
edge reinforcement:none or<No.4 bar
Seismic loads(cat.C,D,E,or F) Tension load:yes(17.2.3.4.3(b))
Shear load:yes(17.2.3.5.3(a))
Note:the HIT-HY 200+HAS-V-36(ASTM F1554 Gr.36)anchor is in the process of phase-out.As a result,there is limited/no inventory available.
Application also possible with HIT-HY 200 V3+HAS-V-36(ASTM F1554 Gr.36)under the selected boundary conditions.
-The anchor calculation is based on a rigid anchor plate assumption.
Geometry[in.]&Loading [lb,in.lb]
i4Oesgn bads 4
Sustained loads
ry M
7
♦ era
x
Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility)
PROFIS Engineering(c)2003-2022 Hilti AG,FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hltl AG,Schaan
5 of 9
I*"I LIT 1
Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.78
www.hilti.com
Company: Miller Consulting Engineers Page: 2
Address: 9570 SW Barbur Blvd#100,Portland,OR 97219 Specifier:
Phone I Fax: I E-Mail:
Design: Lift Anchorage V2 Date: 6/24/2022
Fastening point:
1.1 Design results
Case Description Forces[Ib]/Moments[in.lb] Seismic Max. Util.Anchor[%]
1 Combination 1 N=0;Vx= 1,199;Vy=0; yes 93
Mx=91,678;My=161,946;M,=0;
Nsus=0;Mxsus=0;Mysus=0;
2 Load case/Resulting anchor forces \ 05 Ay 04
Anchor reactions[Ib]
Tension force:(+Tension,-Compression)
Anchor Tension force Shear force Shear force x Shear force y 0 3
1 5,991 136 113 75 0
2 0 173 169 -38 Tension 10-x
3 35 234 231 -38
4 677 289 287 -38 02
5 7,976 297 287 75
6 0 119 113 -38
/ <_
max.concrete compressive strain: 0.26[%u] 1 Compresion 06
max.concrete compressive stress: 1,111 [psi]
resulting tension force in(x/y)=(-3.268/1.559): 14,679[Ib]
resulting compression force in(x/y)=(7.764/-4.686): 14,679[Ib]
Anchor forces are calculated based on the assumption of a rigid anchor plate.
3 Tension load
Load N.[Ib] Capacity 4) Nn[Ib] Utilization Pry=Ned/4 Nn Status
Steel Strength* 7,976 14,550 55 OK
Bond Strength** 14,679 19,354 76 OK
Sustained Tension Load Bond Strength' N/A N/A N/A N/A
Concrete Breakout Failure" 14,679 15,789 93 OK
'highest loaded anchor "anchor group(anchors in tension)
3.1 Steel Strength
Nsa[Ib] 4) 41 Nsa[lb] N.[Ib]
19,400 0.750 14,550 7,976
Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Engineering(c)2003-2022 Hilt AG,FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilt AG,Schaan
6 of 9
°a11T1
Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.78
www.hilti.com
Company: Miller Consulting Engineers Page: 3
Address: 9570 SW Barbur Blvd#100,Portland,OR 97219 Specifier:
Phone I Fax: I E-Mail:
Design: Lift Anchorage V2 Date: 6/24/2022
Fastening point:
3.2 Bond Strength
ANe[In.2] ANao[in.2] cll.[in.] ;min[in.] cac[in.]
1,104.47 450.00 10.607 14.000 21.771
acverhead Tk,uncr[psi] T k,er[p51]
1.000 2,220 1,260
ect N[in.] W ecl,Na ec2,N[in.] `I`ec2,Na Wed,Na Wpp,Na aN,seis
4.966 0.681 1.326 0.889 1.000 1.000 1.000
a Nya[Ib] 04'seismic 4'nonductile 4'Nap[Ib] NUe[Ib]
1.000 26,719 0.650 0.750 1.000 19,354 14,679
3.3 Concrete Breakout Failure
ANc[in?1 ANco[in.2] ca.min[in.] cae[in.] W c.N
1,545.50 729.00 14.000 21.771 1.000
ec1,N[in.1 W ect,N ec2 N[in.] W ec2,N Wed.N Wcp,N kor
4.966 0.731 1.326 0.911 1.000 1.000 17
a [Ib]4'Ncbp Nua[Ib]
Nb[Ib] � seismic
1.000 22,950 0.650 0.750 15,789 14,679
Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Engineering(c)2003-2022 Hilti AG,FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hild AG,Schaan
7 of 9
1011`TI
Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.78
www.hilti.com
Company: Miller Consulting Engineers Page: 4
Address: 9570 SW Barbur Blvd#100, Portland,OR 97219 Specifier:
Phone I Fax: I E-Mail:
Design: Lift Anchorage V2 Date: 6/24/2022
Fastening point:
4 Shear load
Load V.[Ib] Capacity+ V„[Ib] Utilization 9v=Vue/+ V„ Status
Steel Strength* 297 4,540 7 OK
Steel failure(with lever arm)* N/A N/A N/A N/A
Pryout Strength(Concrete Breakout 1,199 56,848 3 OK
Strength controls)**
Concrete edge failure in direction y-** 1,208 11,043 11 OK
*highest loaded anchor **anchor group(relevant anchors)
4.1 Steel Strength
V.[Ib] av,aeie 4t V.[Ib] Vua[lb]
6,984 0.600 0.650 4,540 297
4.2 Pryout Strength(Concrete Breakout Strength controls)
A [in.2] ANe[in.2] ca min[in.] kcp cac[in.] W c.N
1,672.00 729.00 14.000 2 21.771 1.000
ect.v[in.] W eol,V e„z,v[in.] W ec2,V Ved,N Wcp.N kc,
0.000 1.000 4.000 0.771 1.000 1.000 17
a.a Nb[Ib] seismic 4)VG,a[Ib] Vua[Ib]
1.000 22,950 0.700 1.000 56,848 1,199
4.3 Concrete edge failure in direction y-
le[in.] de[in.] cat [in.] Avc[in.2] Ave[in.2]
6.000 0.750 9.333 468.00 392.00
W ed,v Wparalle.v a„v[in.] W ec,v Wc,V Wh,v
1.000 1.000 0.684 0.953 1.000 1.080
/,a Vb[Ib] 4t wseismic 4'Vcbe[Ib] V.[Ib]
1.000 12,831 0.700 1.000 11,043 1,208
5 Combined tension and shear loads
ON Pv ; Utilization PNv[%] Status
0.930 0.109 1.000 87 OK
INV=(PN*Pv)/1.2<= 1
Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Engineering(c)2003-2022 Hilti AG,FL-9494 Schaan Hilfl is a registered Trademark of Hilt AG,Schaan
8 of 9
111111II11111111.I
Hilti PROFIS Engineering 3.0.78
www.hiki.com
Company: Miller Consulting Engineers Page: 5
Address: 9570 SW Barbur Blvd#100, Portland,OR 97219 Specifier:
Phone I Fax: I E-Mail:
Design: Lift Anchorage V2 Date: 6/24/2022
Fastening point:
6 Warnings
• The anchor design methods in PROFIS Engineering require rigid anchor plates per current regulations(AS 5216:2021,ETAG 001/Annex C,
EOTA TR029 etc.).This means load re-distribution on the anchors due to elastic deformations of the anchor plate are not considered-the
anchor plate is assumed to be sufficiently stiff,in order not to be deformed when subjected to the design loading.PROFIS Engineering calculates
the minimum required anchor plate thickness with CBFEM to limit the stress of the anchor plate based on the assumptions explained above.The
proof if the rigid anchor plate assumption is valid is not carried out by PROFIS Engineering. Input data and results must be checked for
agreement with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
• Condition A applies where the potential concrete failure surfaces are crossed by supplementary reinforcement proportioned to tie the potential
concrete failure prism into the structural member.Condition B applies where such supplementary reinforcement is not provided,or where pullout
or pryout strength governs.
• Design Strengths of adhesive anchor systems are influenced by the cleaning method.Refer to the INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE given in the
Evaluation Service Report for cleaning and installation instructions.
• For additional information about ACI 318 strength design provisions,please go to https://submittals.us.hi!ti.com/PROFISAnchorDesignGuide/
• An anchor design approach for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C,D,E or F is given in ACI 318-14,Chapter 17,Section
17.2.3.4.3(a)that requires the governing design strength of an anchor or group of anchors be limited by ductile steel failure.If this is NOT the
case,the connection design(tension)shall satisfy the provisions of Section 17.2.3.4.3(b),Section 17.2.3.4.3(c),or Section 17.2.3.4.3(d).The
connection design(shear)shall satisfy the provisions of Section 17.2.3.5.3(a),Section 17.2.3.5.3(b),or Section 17.2.3.5.3(c).
• Section 17.2.3.4.3(b)/Section 17.2.3.5.3(a)require the attachment the anchors are connecting to the structure be designed to undergo ductile
yielding at a load level corresponding to anchor forces no greater than the controlling design strength.Section 17.2.3.4.3(c)/Section 17.2.3.5.3
(b)waive the ductility requirements and require the anchors to be designed for the maximum tension/shear that can be transmitted to the
anchors by a non-yielding attachment.Section 17.2.3.4.3(d)/Section 17.2.3.5.3(c)waive the ductility requirements and require the design
strength of the anchors to equal or exceed the maximum tension/shear obtained from design load combinations that include E,with E increased
by coo.
• Installation of Hilti adhesive anchor systems shall be performed by personnel trained to install Hilti adhesive anchors.Reference ACI 318-14,
Section 17.8.1.
Fastening meets the design criteria!
Input data and results must be checked for conformity with the existing conditions and for plausibility!
PROFIS Engineering(c)2003-2022 Hilti AG,FL-9494 Schaan Hilti is a registered Trademark of Hilti AG,Schoen
9 of 9