Report (2) gFc / 5 Cmlo,c/o 4-rt # 20 2 z- O03 9q
„ „, ,,,
I ,L
,, ,,
0 0 < w i I.f) 13.:1a��^s / Z
E,
1
z o tY a J y = O •
u . a = F C DESIGN_
" FIELD REPORT
Page 1 of 1
i \
----- . Il i ii3-?'
1
GDI Project Polygon-126-07 Prepared By. Dan Boileau
s• , 1 i° iv ° ` Project Name: South River Terrace - Phase 1
03/6/2023
_� I ' i � `
Q ,, Location: SW Bull Mountain Road and SW Roy Report#: 149
Rogers Roa
d, Tigard
I
Arrival: 0815 Departure. 0900
' Weather
222 a loudy, 40s Permit#:
/* • Site Visit Requested By Rob (Taylor Morrison) Met With (on site): Rob (Taylor Morrison)
z s .t
111
A t ,� Purpose: . Observe Lot 37 (Bldg. 4) Subgrade
a I<; Outstanding Issues: FR 79 Soft Spots, 3 lots on north side of Beemer, west of 165th Avenue (9/22/21)
b S'l� a I observed crews had excavated to design subgrade elevation and placed approx. 1-2" of what appeared to be 1 %" 0
- crushed recycled concrete. I evaluated the subgrade and base rock using a V2 inch diameter steel foundation probe.
i-1 I — Based onpenetration resistance, nativebrownsilt trace sandsubgrade observed todaygeneral) a Y ppeared to be
3II �( ' I r. , II ¢}3 i a medium stifftostiffandthebaserockobservedtodayappearedtobeloose. Underfoundations, werecommendIl; : , -_ i' t ` Z , o I light compaction until base rock is well keyed and firm under foot. We recommend rock be well-keyed and firm
€ a w 3 ;�ti under foot at the time of concrete pour.
_ 1 . .
�� ' r;. ;
rffi — 13 I observed 3 areas where approx. 1 1 .5' of open grade angular drain rock had been placed over corrugated pipe. We
:I 1. C Ac,
any footing perpendicularly traversing trench backfill be compacted until well keyed
war recommend areas of continuous
�; .4 ,, - ° 61- ' E._ _, - --,., j b ._ and dense. If pad footings or continuous footings reside on trench backfill, we recommend NV5 be notified for
0 ® u '" ter` M Il k� n • further observations and recommendations.
t 'O v G - 'A b U a a
r
1e ' A w a •Q Based on our observations and probing, opinionexposedsubgrade
b
. 1 '0 i.. m v it is our the sub rode & base rock at the locations and
- i9 4 I 3 = elevations noted above is being prepared in general accordance with the project geotechnical report and our field
r I 'i _ o c" , ; ' ; 1 recommendations provided aforementioned recommendations are enacted.
a II a o A <
H
� - • - - Distribution:
---
rn O 1
+. j Attachments. p ( )
I ' ts: Site Ian 1
C -21111.1.
CC 0 � � Reviewed by:
Li_ O -O IIJ II t i� Is f J
1
N0 _ _ ..:.� ..
CO 0 ^ —- I � --- - ----— This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services. We rely on th on to o r mply with the plans and
% !IliallIMION specifications throcgnoul the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction th t ct .the contractor's employees
CO V — - ; _ _ _ - _J or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety. This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations.testing,and preliminary eco men . T'e report can only be
O - - ' 1 ' ' considered final upon review of the NV5 project manager,as indicated by initials in the'Reviewed BY section.
1 '
0OSign C a O Signature:
MIIIIIIIIIEF E ENO
I
Q J
O
d
9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 300 I Wilsonville,OR 97070 1503.968.8787 I www.geodesigninc.com