Loading...
TCDA Packet - 2/7/2023 114 • City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND FEBRUARY 7,2023 - 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting TIME: MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid- City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 - See PUBLIC NOTICE below PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with the City of Tigard's Safety Plan related to COVID-19 and Oregon House Bill 4212,this will be a hybrid meeting where some Council, staff or public will participate in person and some will participate remotely. How to comment: •Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments before noon the day of the meeting. •If attending the meeting in person,please fill out the public comment sign-in sheet at the front of the room and come to the microphone when your name is called. •If you prefer to call in,please call 503-966-4101 when instructed to be placed in the queue.We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to three minutes. •You may comment through video through the Teams app. Go to this link to learn how to participate by video: February 7,2023 Council Meeting (https://www.tigard-or.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/2921/372). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM ONLINE:https://www.tigard-or.gov/boxcast CABLE VIEWERS:The City Council meeting will be shown live on Channel 28 at 6:30 p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Saturday 7:30 p.m. Sunday 11:30 a.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. " City of Tigard • • Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE AND TIME: FEBRUARY 7,2023 -6:30 p.m.Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid- City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITION 3. PUBLIC COMMENT 6:35 p.m. estimated time A. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment B. Public Comment—Written C. Public Comment—In Person D. Public Comment—Phone-In E. Public Comment—Video 4. TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY JOINT MEETING WITH TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (ICAC) 6:45 p.m. estimated time 5. 2023 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP) UPDATE-TIGARD DRAFT PROJECT LIST 7:25 p.m. estimated time 6. CLIMATE ADAPTATION AND NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION 7:55 p.m. estimated time 7. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 8. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 8:40 p.m. estimated time 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session. If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 10. ADJOURNMENT 8:45 p.m. estimated time 1111 • r • • TIGARD Public Comments received by noon for the February 7, 2023 Meeting of the Tigard City Council 1. Matthew Martini 1/26/2023 Public and street safety concerns in residential neighborhood. 2. Steve Holgate 1/31/2023 Tigard action on climate change 3. Alan Smith 2/3/2023 Ideas for improving Tigard's environment Jesse Raymundo From: City of Tigard, OR <webteam@tigard-or.gov> Sent: Thursday,January 26, 2023 3:23 AM To: Carol Krager;Jesse Raymundo;Webteam Subject: *NEW SUBMISSION* Public Meeting Comment Form Public Meeting Comment Form Submission#: 2207711 IP Address: 50.39.219.88 Submission Date: 01/26/2023 3:23 Survey Time: 31 minutes, 10 seconds You have a new online form submission. Note: all answers displaying"*****"are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login. Name Matthew Martini Email Complete Address 10675 SW Walnut St Tigard,Oregon 97223 Which agenda item or topic are you commenting on? (Comments are due by noon the day of the meeting) Public safety Comments I am a resident of a property on the intersection of Walnut and Tiedeman. It is one of the busier residential streets in town. In recent years,we(my neighbors and I) have been dealing with reckless driving that has led to houses either being hit by cars or nearly hit by cars. Please see the attached photo evidence. Please also reference recent case#23-000-1660(Tigard police)and Court#22CR25845 (Washington Co. DA).The city needs to address this concern, not only to protect the citizens who live in these properties, but also those who walk in the area.This intersection is across from Fowler Middle School,which has hundreds of children walking to school each day. It is imperative that the city puts up something akin to armco fencing/crash barrier around the"stone circle" in that intersection,to prevent drivers from hitting houses and/or citizens.Too many drivers miss the turn,due to reckless driving or impairment.You can easily peruse the police records of these matters in recent years to see that this issue is not an exaggeration, but very real and concerning. I look forward to your response.Sincerely, Matthew Martini 10675 SW Walnut St Tigard,OR 97223 Attachment Supporting Documents/Images 100w.j pg 200w.jpg 300w.jpg 400w.JPG Thank you, City of Tigard 1 This is an automated message generated by Granicus.Please do not reply directly to this email. 2 PP tieti-41 .'771 ' 1111041...! 44 ' k Lititi\lp, I. a lillitIL i i It if",;, .!.. 6 I i 01.11 J -- "URI _ 046 i _. I • ■ 1.1 401 1 ti • I r r.. 11 A '.� ,. ,-. .OM1 {14' -% , +'a• , • • !7 r'! ..,;,-..,i, r, t . �, ' ,� w I , e " ;, _ ,•44--. ! 1.e , ay" ��" l9'.' — r • a, ..,'-.4 ce '. _ . 1' ..T .1,:.� -"' l' �4 at�i .`�' 54 17 �!.. . : i - • . 7.1 •-. t -N ;r ,.,1.. 1.- ',4 • .! •, ' • 1t s.. - ..,ms s _ �% 4 .1 - . �• ,7r I„ � W ',C ' a 77 a 4• -( T :� �. -r1, , • '. •i•,. ,• ► . : • - •• 4J4.' $ \\ A - - .• ., ,, s.i. j 1� . r C � 'i • .X • ' t ' i tea. II { 1 P Is �' :..4.• Sr . '''' i '0. I' '%..7. • . . . 4. .:, . . ..4. • . • - i .•,-,-r + `• 1 E C'�li , l..r-. d - ";, 'IP _• :. • ' ti s X41 { -.II • / ..„ j 9I • •...,'• • 4.t• ro �i'�, s } ' r'•� 4' '` ; �+_ r I< tits` • , ei. i • • ,z. L • e ' - r • � � 3 ' i 41116 r r� Jesse Raymundo From: Joanne Bengtson Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 6:03 PM To: Jesse Raymundo Subject: FW:Tigard Action on Climate Change From: Steve Holgate Sent:Tuesday,January 31, 2023 10:31 AM To:#Councilmail <councilmail@tigard-or.gov> Subject:Tigard Action on Climate Change ISome people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important Dear Members of the Tigard City Council You were kind enough to allow me to speak to you some time ago on the critical need to act against climate change. As you consider policy proposals on this issue, I would like to try your patience a bit further by following up with this letter. As I mentioned at the time of my testimony, I grew up in Tigard and, though I now live in unincorporated Washington County, I still consider it the home of my heart. The imperative to act against climate change couldn't be more clear. But analysis and planning are needed to identify the most effective actions. From what I have seen of the proposals going to the council, this kind of work is well under way. These measures promise not only to protect the health and safety of your constituents, but will help Tigard attract the kind of young, entrepreneurial workers who will lend dynamism and growth to the local economy. None of these measures come cheaply. A lack of action, though, will prove even more costly. The council is faced with the choice of paying for the solution or paying for the disaster. The latter will prove far more expensive for Tigard residents than the former. And, if Tigard presents a strong plan for reducing greenhouse gasses, there may be substantial federal assistance from the IRA. It's true that, in the context of global climate change, Tigard's role is relatively small. But this crisis calls on all of us to act, to do our part. We can't avoid our responsibility to contribute what we can. The council's seriousness in considering climate change is truly admirable. I have confidence that you will make the decisions necessary to address this, the most important issue of our time. Best Regards, Steve Holgate 1 DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 2 Jesse Raymundo From: Joanne Bengtson Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 10:29 AM To: Jesse Raymundo; Carol Krager Subject: RE: Ideas for improving Tigard's environment From:Alan Smith Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 2:50 PM To:Yi-Kang Hu <yikang.hu@tigard-or.gov>, Heidi Lueb Subject: Ideas for improving Tigard's environment Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important Hi,Yi; First, congratulations on being elected as a City Councilor(and President) for Tigard. I am an alternate member of the Tigard Library Advisory Board and have enjoyed that experience so far. My email to you today relates to Tigard's environmental and climate initiatives. I'd like to make three points. 1. The first point is that rapidly moving forward with initiatives to electrify homes (appliances and HVAC) can make a big difference. I've been an electric vehicle driver for over three years now, and there's no reason for me to go back to a fossil-fueled vehicle.The City of Tigard should follow along with the rapid electrification of its fleet of vehicles and its facilities (replacing gas heating with heat pumps). 2. You as a public official can make a difference in our community by committing to electrification.This can visibly show your commitment to Tigard citizens and other leaders.There's a national program related to this that would be great for you to join: https://www.rewiringamerica.org/policy/local-gov-leaders-for-electrification 3. Tigard's building codes can have a big impact and need to also encourage movement toward our adopted climate goals. I've read a great book called "The Big Fix" by Hal Harvey that talks about how building codes can make this difference. It's available at our Tigard Library- here's a link to it: https://wccls.bibliocommons.com/v2/record/S143C4093511. I'd encourage you to read it and think how its suggestions might be applied in Tigard. Thanks for reading my email and best regards, Alan Smith Tigard resident-Summerlake Area DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3.0 - PUBLIC COMMENT C{ - ATE: February 7, 2023 (Limited to 2 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues no on the agenda but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and cities of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME& CITY YOU LIVE IN TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email AIS-5113 4. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/07/2023 Length (in minutes):40 Minutes Agenda Title: TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY JOINT MEETING WITH TOWN CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION (TCAC) Authored By: Sean Farrelly Presented By: Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Joint Meeting-Board or Other Juris. Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Annual joint meeting of the Board of the Town Center Development Agency (ICDA) with the Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC). ACTION REQUESTED Team recommends the TCDA Board hold the joint meeting with the Town Center Advisory Commission to discuss the 2022 Annual Report and draft 2023 goals. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC) makes recommendations to the Board of the Town Center Development Agency (ICDA) on Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District policy, budget and implementation measures for both the Tigard Triangle and the City Center TIF Districts. The TCAC meets annually with the Board of the TCDA to share information and receive feedback. The TCAC leadership elected at the January meeting are Chair Tom Murphy, and Vice-Chair Adrian Hinkley. The team liaison to the TCAC is Sean Farrelly. Two items will inform the joint meeting discussion - the TCAC's 2022 Annual Report, and the 2023 draft goals. The 2022 Annual Report was previously provided in the December 8, 2022, Council Newsletter and included as an attachment for the Board's review. The TCAC developed draft goals for 2023 at the January 11 meeting. The TCAC will present and review these draft goals with the TCDA Board before finalizing at the February 8 meeting. The TCAC's adopted goals, as well as the City Center Redevelopment Action Plan and the New Tigard Triangle:Planning for Equitable Development documents will guide staff's implementation of the TIF District plans. A brief presentation from the TCAC will be available prior to this meeting. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable ADDITIONAL RESOURCES The last joint meeting with the TCAC was February 1, 2022. Attachments TCAC 2022 Annual Report 2022 Annual Report of the Town Center Advisory Commission To the Board of the Town Center Development Agency December 1,2022 The TCAC worked to produce draft goals and objectives for calendar year 2022 in January 2022 and presented those goals to the TCDA Board on February 1, 2022. The TCAC's 2022 goals were then formally adopted by the Commission on February 9, 2022. The Commission's overarching, aspirational goal for 2022 is to: Continue to facilitate and promote opportunities for the development of affordable housing, provide support for equitable business development, and advance efforts toward improved walkability, equity, and connectivity within and between both TIF districts. Affordable Housing and Houselessness Goals •Recommend specific programs, innovations, and policies to City staff and Council that directly affect,support, and encourage the development and preservation of affordable housing forms downtown and in the Tigard Triangle. •Support the City Council's and private entities'response to houselessness. Accomplishments: • Houselessness work group formed • Recommended $1.0M development assistance for REACH CDC's Dartmouth Avenue North apartment building,which was approved by the Board. • Workgroup invited Just Compassion's CEO and city staff houselessness resource staff to make presentations to the TCAC • TCAC member attends CHART meetings Equitable Business Development Goals •Advocate for affected stakeholders, learn about and research the needs, identify the opportunities and constraints within each district to better support equitable business development. •Support the implementation of multi-language resources by City staff; recommend specific programs and policies to City staff and TCDA that directly affect, support and encourage equitable business development downtown and in the Tigard Triangle. Accomplishments: Work group held well-attended interactive workshop on Downtown business recruitment in August. Presented findings to TCAC in September. The workgroup will share recommendations with the Board of the TCDA on December 6. Connectivity and Transit Goals •Identify, prioritize, and recommend opportunities for development that improve living and working,foster walkability, and promote equity. •Promote ongoing efforts toward multi-modal connectivity within and between both TIF districts. •Study the options for crossings that could connect the two TIF districts Accomplishments: TCAC was briefed on the Downtown Reimagined project which will develop recommendations for Hall Blvd and other street improvements Formation of Work Groups Goals The TCAC will form subcommittees for each of these three Areas of Emphasis(AOE). Each subcommittee will: •Research and review prior work pertaining to each AOE and summarize it for the whole TCAC. Integrate and make use of work that has been done by others. •Amplify current and previously marginalized voices. •Serve as the TCAC's content experts for the AOE, bringing in outside presenters, recommend reading and resources for TCAC members and lead discussions throughout the year related to TCAC work for each AOE. Accomplishments: The TCAC has formed two active workgroups : Equitable Business Development and Affordable Housing and Houselessness. Downtown Tigard TIF District Goals •Participate in the implementation of the Tigard Development Strategy Updated 5-year plan. •Monitor existing projects until completion and assess their outcome with site visits. 'Participate in stakeholder meetings and TCAC briefings for the Downtown Reimagined project. •Support projects identified in the City's 2022 version of the 6-year Capital Improvement Plan for Downtown. •Remain informed on the Downtown parking strategy and its impact on the downtown area. •Recruit and support diverse business owners and businesses for vacant spaces in downtown. Accomplishments: • Organized a walking tour of Downtown • Wrote letter of support for Universal Plaza Phase 2 funding • Equitable Business workgroup making recommendations on business recruitment Tigard Triangle TIF District Goals •Continue to provide financial support for projects that meet the project optimization process and equitable evaluation criteria (A New Tigard Triangle, 2020). 'Promote and support projects identified for years 2020-2025 in the Implementation and Action Plan (A New Tigard Triangle, 2020). •Recruit and support diverse business owners and businesses for the Tigard Triangle. •Acquire property for parks and trail system. 'Ensure that residents and business owners are aware of the Tigard Opportunity Fund. Accomplishments: • TCAC's advocacy for improved pedestrian circulation resulted in agreement with REACH to build offsite sidewalks • Recommendation for DIG Hampton Street development assistance • First Opportunity grant award to El Jefe Mexican Grill On behalf of the Town Center Advisory Commission, Tom Murphy Scott Hancock Chair,TCAC Vice Chair,TCAC r SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR FEBRUARY 7, 2023 COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM 4 ------ ;�e ,I 1 - iga 'espect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done trTil 'ri . _ Board of the Town Center Development Agency Joint Meeting with the Town Center Advisory Commission 7 February 2023 TIGARD City ofTigard Tigard's TIF Districts Ci,:1:'c'•',) 4 'ILa 5W TAYLORS FERRYna 0 it 401 d y.W - t "y Hr[ N t a Ai'P ev ._._. .Vf r s r er G - 0 g z .1r g Y cI 3 4 L d R . i z 1 "% Portl.a.nd . '.1 Y ,� Y fF R i b '9'••6•,,,,,,.., 1� b-- '''''. :iiii i;s :.. y;� J.::^ r�'rvrh s r ,SFli liLl y.. iu ui 6 10 c �yU= of kv,,ary 4. a, -\ cR 67 ',! $ • M1IC.- e 4 f • and 1'11111111k, 11 1111.011-47 , Lake • Oswego laIle Cv re' .J. T Y l K IluJ• L PrhY T . ''r 5Y:FIC.7GHALC 3T c. a ill A6:7Wa 9b —.41111 v Q Turd Tr olgte Urban Renewal ^' ,...rRa AN Of Arra a i1Y aCu•.TA RD 0 CITY CMt&Urban Renewal 'm s Diitrkt !I c .c y II City ofTigard Agenda • City staff liaison opening remarks • Introductions • Annual report 2022 & Goals for 2023 / Affordable Housing & Houselessness / Equitable Business Development / Connectivity & Access • TCDA Board feedback on 2023 goals and discussion . " '�. -- City ofTigard ig and Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing Get it Done G_ } r Town Center Advisory Commission 2022 Annual Report & 2023 Goals Tom Murphy, Chair, Town Center Advisory Commission NI Adrian Hinckley, Vice Chair, Town Center Advisory Commission TIGARD City ofTigard Affordable Housing and Houselessness 2022 Annual Report Review • Advocate for stakeholders, learn the needs, identify the opportunities and minimize constraints that exist within each district, and refer to existing studies and assessments where appropriate. Recommend specific programs, innovations, and policies to City staff and Council that directly affect, support, and encourage the development and preservation of affordable housing forms downtown and in the Tigard Triangle. Support the City Council's and private entities' response to houselessness Accomplishments: • Houselessness work group formed • Recommended $1.0M development assistance for REACH CDC's Dartmouth Avenue North apartment building, which was approved by the Board. • Workgroup invited Just Compassion's CEO and city staff houselessness resource staff to make presentations to the TCAC • TCAC member attends CHART meetings City ofTigard Affordable Housing and Houselessness 2023 Areas of Emphasis (AOE) • Advocate for stakeholders, including the houseless population, and learn their needs; determine the need for additional affordable, affordable market rate, and market rate housing; identify the opportunities and minimize constraints that exist within each district; and refer to existing reports, studies and assessments where appropriate. • Recommend specific programs, innovations and policies to TCDA Board and staff that directly encourage the development and preservation of affordable housing in the downtown and Tigard Triangle. Ism Support the City Council's and private entities' response to houselessness. Desired Outcomes: • Meet with local housing organizations to promote TIF programs and learn about their activities • Continue to support funding requests for affordable housing. City ofTigard Equitable Business Development 2022 Annual Report Review •Advocate for affected stakeholders, learn about and - -arch the needs, identify the opportunities and constraints within each district to better support equitable business development. Support the implementation of multi-language resources by City staff; recommend specific programs and policies to City staff and TCDA that directly affect, support and encourage equitable business development downtown and in the Tigard Triangle. Accomplishments: • Work group held well-attended interactive workshop on Downtown business recruitment in August regarding eating & drinking establishment. 1. Uniqueness; Quality, healthy & local; Kid & family friendly 2. Parking & Safety; Customer service & cleanliness 3. Walkability 4. We have a list of business recommendations • Interviewed neighboring cities Beaverton & Lake Oswego regarding their business recruiting strategies. • Proactive vs Reactive approach from the city. City ofTigard Equitable Business Development 2023 Areas of Emphasis (AOE) E Advocate for affected stakeholders, learn a 'out and research t e needs, identify the opportunities and constraints within each district to better support equitable business development. Review and make recommendations on current parking plans for both districts with staff. Develop a plan that accounts for growth in these districts. Develop non-conventional business opportunities such as: co-ops, foodcart pods, maker spaces, business incubators, etc. Desired Outcomes: • Continue work group - Pursue 2022 recommendations — Explore sources of funding for programs to support new & existing businesses that don't qualify for TIF funds - Schedule 2 presentations by TDA -participate in "Stable Table" process. Make recommendations on creating separate work groups for the two TIF districts • Start with reviewing parking survey responses gathered in 2022. Continue fact finding in Triangle with a survey for that district. Understand the needs and advise the TCDA on future parking projects. • Brainstorm possibilities and speak to business types listed. Explore what incentives will attract these kind of businesses and investments in the TIF districts. City ofTigard Connectivity and Transit 2022 Annual Report Review •Identify, prioritize, and recommend opportunities for development that improve living and working, foster walkability, and promote equity. Promote ongoing efforts toward multi-modal connectivity within and between both IF districts. •Study the options for crossings that could connect the two TIF districts Accomplishments: • TCAC was briefed on the Downtown Reimagined project which will develop recommendations for Hall Blvd and other street improvements • Successfully advocated for sidewalk infill as part of the REACH Dartmouth Crossing North project City ofTigard Connectivity & Access 2023 Areas of Emphasis (AOE) • Identify, prioritize, and recommend opportunities for development that improve ik living and working, foster walkability, and promote equity. • Promote ongoing efforts toward multi-modal connectivity within and between both TIF districts. • Study the options for crossings that could connect the two TIF districts • Develop wayfinding means for the public to utilize within the two TIF districts and between the two TIF Districts i i Desired Outcomes: • Support city's goal to obtain funding to improve and take ownership of Hall Blvd. • Look for other opportunities in the Triangle for pedestrian improvements • Support the city's grant request for 72nd Ave improvements City ofTigard Workgroups Affordable Housing & Equitable Business Houselessness Development Connectivity and Access i Downtown Tigard & Tigard Triangle TIF District Next Steps • Continue the developing the formation of our 2023 workgroups • Continue to refine our proposed goals for 2023 • Based on our goals, we will develop and refine our Key Performance Indicators & deadlines to meet our goals City ofTigard DiscussionIIIIIIIII AIS-5119 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/07/2023 Length (in minutes):30 Minutes Agenda Title: 2023 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Update -Tigard Draft Project List Authored By: Dave Roth Presented By: Dave Roth, Senior Transportation Planner Item Type: Motion Requested Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Metro is in the process of updating the Federally mandated Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Updated every five years, the RTP provides a shared vision and strategy for transportation investments over a 23-year period.The RTP guides coordinated investments in all forms of travel—motor vehicle, transit, bicycle, and walking as well as the movement of goods and freight throughout the Portland metropolitan region. All types of projects are included in the RTP project list—highways, key roads, transit, freight, bicycling and walking, as well as programs. The RTP identifies current and future regional transportation needs,investment priorities needed to meet those needs, and local, regional, state, and federal transportation funds the region anticipates being made available to make those investments over the 23-year plan horizon. The RTP contains: •A long-term vision for the region's transportation system; •Goals and supporting objectives and performance targets to indicate plan progress; •Policies that guide decisions and actions in pursuit of the plan's vision and goals; •A financial plan that identifies how the region will pay for investments; and •An investment strategy that includes major local,regional, and state transportation investment priorities that address transportation needs and help achieve the vision and goals identified in the plan. As the greater Portland region's Federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO),Metro carries out metropolitan transportation planning processes such as coordinating and updating the RTP. Last updated in 2018, the RTP update is underway with expected legislative action taken by the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) and Metro Council in late November or early December of 2023. Developing Transportation Revenue Assumptions During the fall of 2022,Tigard Community Development, Finance, and Public Works Engineering teammates coordinated with staff from Metro and Washington County to develop a local and countywide revenue forecast for the RTP 2023-2045 plan horizon time period. Revenue sources (Table 1) include state gas taxes and vehicle registration fees,Washington County gas tax and vehicle registration fees,Washington County Transportation Development Tax (TDT),Transportation System Development Charges (SDCs),local gas tax,Tigard tax increment financing programs, and anticipated state and federal grants.The total cost estimate of all financially constrained Tigard 23-28 RTP projects and programs must total no more than the cost target identified for each time period in the RTP. Table 1: Tigard Revenue Forecast (Year of Expenditure $) Financially Constrained List Strategic Priorities List Total Tigard RTP List Near(Highest Priority) Late (High Priority) I Additional Priorities 2024-2030 2031-2045 2031-2045 2024-2045 $73,792,779 $191,182,279 I $264,975,058 I $529,950,116 I Developing Tigard's RTP Project List In December 2022,Metro issued a "Call for Projects" that requires individual agencies to submit proposed RTP projects through an online web portal between January 6 to February 17,2023, as described in the 2023 RTP Call for Projects Overview (Exhibit 1). Cities, counties, and other transportation providers work together through coordinating committees to prioritize RTP projects. The City of Portland, the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), the Port of Portland,TriMet and SMART work individually to develop project lists.All pr jects submitted to the RTP must come from adopted plans or strategies that were developed with prior public input. The Policy Framework for the 2023 RTP Update (Exhibit 2) guides the development of the project list. The RTP uses an outcomes-based approach such that projects included must support the overarching RTP vision and goals developed by JPACT and Metro Council in 2022. RTP goals include equitable transportation, climate action and resilience, thriving economy, safe systems, and mobility options. In addition to the RTP policy framework, the Call for Projects is informed by public engagement, adopted regional plans,revenue forecasts, and additional related policy elements. For inclusion in the RTP,projects and programs must meet the following eligibility requirements: •Projects must be on at least one of the regional networks of the RTP designated regional transportation system; •Projects must be within the region's federally recognized metropolitan planning area (MPA) boundary; •Projects must be in an adopted plan developed through a public process; •Project costs in 2023 dollars must be at least$2 million,however smaller projects may be bundled with similar projects to meet the minimum cost threshold; •All projects that change or add capacity must be specifically and individually identified for modelling purposes; and •Projects with committed funding that are not substantially complete must be included in the RTP. Starting with the existing 2018 RTP project list,Tigard Community Development and Public Works Engineering teammates developed Tigard's Draft 2023 RTP project list (Exhibit 3). Further coordination with Washington County and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) staff on several key projects has occurred and will continue as the RTP list is refined in the coming months. Creation of Tigard's draft 2023 RTP project list consisted of removing several projects that have been completed since 2018, revising project cost estimates consistent with guidance from Metro and Washington County, adding or modifying projects for consistency with Tigard's 2040 Transportation System Plan (adopted 2022), adjusting anticipated timing of implementation based on Tigard's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and putting some projects on hold. A total of eight projects are put on hold because they were eliminated during the recent 2040 TSP update, or additional preliminary study or refinement work is required to better define the capital scope of work. It is possible that some additional strategic projects will be put on hold based on refinement of revenue assumptions. In accordance with the Call for Projects,Tigard's draft 2023 RTP project list prioritizes projects for implementation within the next seven years (by 2030, `near') and others for the next 22 years (by 2045, `late') to create a financially constrained project list. A third list of projects, the `strategic' or unconstrained project list,will include additional priorities that advance local and RTP goals but whose estimated costs do not fit within the assumed plan horizon revenue projections. In the time since the RTP was last updated,project costs have increased significantly due to inflation, supply chain issues, and high demand for services. The total number of projects included in the 2023 RTP will likely be smaller than the 2018 RTP due to cost escalation driven by these factors. Teammates continue to refine project cost estimates in accordance with Metro and Washington County guidance; project cost estimates as they appear on the draft project list are subject to change. Next Steps Each agency needs to submit its draft RTP project list and updated project information according to Metro guidelines using an online web portal,the "RTP Project Hub" during the Call for Projects window between January 6 and February 17, 2023. Metro's RTP Schedule and Deadlines (Exhibit 4) describes the deadlines for the Call for Projects and the timeline for RTP adoption. Metro's Project Submission Guide (Exhibit 5)provides detailed information and instructions on the draft RTP project list submission process. By February 17, the Washington County Coordinating Committee (WCCC) must provide an Excel list of Washington County cities' draft RTP project lists—including Tigard's (Exhibit 3). Between late February and May 2023,Metro staff will conduct an assessment of all submitted draft RTP projects and will engage with policymakers, regional advisory committees, and the public to gather comments and feedback on the draft project list. No later than May 24, 2023, agencies are required to submit a letter of endorsement from their governing bodies in support of project lists submitted by their staff. ACTION REQUESTED The Community Development team requests Council to make a motion authorizing teammates to take all actions necessary to complete step 1 and step 2 as described below. Step 1: By February 17, 2023, submit a letter from Council (Exhibit 6) to Oregon Metro endorsing Tigard's 2023 RTP Draft Project List (Exhibit 3) thus fulfilling the requirement for governing bodies to endorse individual agencies'project lists. Step 2: Make any needed refinements to Tigard's 2023 RTP Draft Project List in response to the 2023 RTP project assessment and engagement period that will occur between February and May 2023. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Transportation System Plan (2040 TSP):Adopted after a two-year extensive engagement process, the 2040 TSP guides local transportation priorities and investments during the 20-year plan horizon. As Tigard's adopted transportation system plan, the 2040 TSP is foundational in the development of the 2023 RTP draft local project list.The 2040 TSP contains the following goals: •Goal 1: Providing a safe, comfortable, and connected transportation system for all users, especially pedestrians and other vulnerable users. •Goal 2: Supporting environmental and community health by reducing our carbon footprint, minimizing impacts to natural resources, and addressing unequal health impacts of our transportation system on low-income communities and communities of color. •Goal 3: Improving quality of life for all,particularly historically marginalized and underserved communities,by providing access to jobs, schools, and essential services with convenient and affordable travel options. •Goal 4: Creating livable neighborhoods that are designed to improve multimodal connections while discouraging unsafe interactions, such as speeding. •Goal 5: Supporting economic vibrancy by accommodating the movement of people and goods and creating equitable opportunities for economic development throughout Tigard. •Goal 6: Making the most of transportation resources by leveraging funding opportunities, not overbuilding our system, and making investments that reduce ongoing system maintenance and preservation costs. Complete Streets Policy: Envisions a vibrant and healthy community where people of all ages and abilities can travel safely, efficiently, and comfortably on a well-connected and optimized multi-modal network of roads, trails, and paths. Strategic Plan Vision:An Equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone •Priority: Create a well-connected pedestrian network that links all Tigard residents and businesses. •Priority:Tigard's pedestrian network is attractive, accessible, safe, and well maintained. •Priority: Plan and create in a manner that reduces climate impacts to the maximum extent practicable, especially for those most vulnerable. Community Resiliency Plan Final Report: •The second-largest emissions sector in Tigard in 2019 was transportation which produced over 233,000 tons of GHG emissions, or 41% of the total. •Without intervention,personal transportation will continue to be dominated by cars with 87% of all trips being taken in personally owned vehicles, and 49% of all trips taken in single-occupant vehicles (SOVs). •Additional Low Carbon Transportation Actions: •Increase the combined transit and active transportation mode share to 20% of all trips taken by 2035. •Electrify the transit fleet providing trips to Tigardians in alignment with TriMet's goals to reduce emissions below 2019 levels by 70%in 2030, by 90%in 2040, and net zero by 2050. •Electrify the municipal fleet and equipment such that by 2028, 100% of new vehicles or equipment purchased by the City for its operations is electric. •Electrify personal and light-duty commercial vehicles such that by 2025, 30% of new vehicles purchased are electric,rising to 90%by 2030, and to 100%by 2035. •By 2025, ensure that 10% of all new medium and heavy-duty commercial vehicles purchased produce zero emissions (meaning they are replaced with electric or hydrogen models). By 2030,this should rise to 90% of new vehicle sales, and to 100%by 2035. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The Community Development team recommends Council make a motion authorizing teammates to take all actions necessary to complete steps 1 and 2 as described below: Step 1: By February 17, 2023, submit a letter from Council (Exhibit 6) to Oregon Metro endorsing Tigard's 2023 RTP Draft Project List (Exhibit 3) thus fulfilling the requirement for governing bodies to endorse individual agencies'project lists. Step 2: Make any needed refinements to Tigard's 2023 RTP Draft Project List in response to the 2023 RTP project assessment and engagement period that will occur between February and May 2023. Council could instead opt to not authorize Tigard teammates to submit a letter in support of Tigard's draft RTP project list to Metro in February 2023 and postpone to a future date prior to May 24,2023. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Attachments Exhibit 1 2023 Call for Projects Overview Exhibit 2 Policy Framework for 2023 RTP Update Exhibit 3 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 4 2023 RTP Schedule and Deadlines Exhibit 5 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide Exhibit-6-2023-RTP-Project-List-Endorsement-Letter 2023 RTP Tigard Call for Projects 020723 Council Presentation Exhibit 1 December 2022 T eV 04, 2023 Regional Transportation Plan Metro Call for projects overview This document describes the call for projects process and the role of elected officials and other decision-makers in developing the draft project lists. What is the call for projects? The 2023 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) will include an updated list of transportation investment priorities for the greater Portland region.This list will include investments such as transit,sidewalk,bridge,bikeway and roadway projects as well as transit service and road maintenance and operations.Among these projects, some will be prioritized for funding within the next seven years,by 2030,and others for the next 22 years.A third list of projects will include additional priorities that advance RTP goals or need further study but that do not fit within the financial budget of the plan.The 2023 RTP policy framework will guide the development of the project list. JAN.TO FEB.'23 MARCH TO JUNE '23 JULY TO A 2023 RTP blic Review Dra Call for Projects High-level 023 RTP an. Submission Period Assessment Project and of Projects pro ram Jan. 6 to Feb. 177.1 0 g System Analysis Prioriti Coordinating committees, cines,counties and ogeecies •my 10 to Au.. - rdennfy priorities Engagement activities JPACT and Metro Council direction JPACT and Metro Council direction on policy framework for the on release of draft plan and project Call for Projects lists for public review Where do the project priorities come from? Cities, counties and other transportation providers work together through coordinating committees to prioritize projects.The City of Portland,the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT),the Port of Portland,TriMet and SMART work individually to develop project lists.All projects submitted to the RTP must come from adopted plans or strategies that were developed with public input. When do jurisdictions'draft project lists need to be submitted? Each jurisdiction needs to submit its draft project list and project information during the call for projects submission window,which is from January 6 to February 17, 2023. How many projects are on each jurisdiction's list? It will vary. Each city and county,ODOT,TriMet, SMART and the Port of Portland have worked with Metro to develop a forecast of revenues expected to be available.The cost targets for each coordinating committee (and it cities),the City of Portland, ODOT, TriMet, SMART and the Port of Portland reflect the revenues expected to be available. Cost targets vary by coordinating committee and agency for a variety of reasons oregonmetro.gov/rtp 1 Exhibit 1 Do jurisdictions need to include ALL the final information for each project in the draft list? Yes.All project information must be submitted by the call for projects deadline on February 17, 2023. What if jurisdictions want to make changes to the project list after reviewing project list assessments and receiving community input? Refinements to the draft project list may be identified between the end of February and May 24, 2023. Refinements are anticipated to be limited to the prioritization of projects, including changes to strategic vs.constrained lists,project timing, project scope/description,and project cost. Proposed refinements to the project list must be communicated to Metro no later than May 24. By May 24,all agencies must submit a letter from their governing body endorsing the projects submitted during the call for projects and documenting any refinements proposed to the submitted draft list.These refinements will be presented to JPACT and the Metro Council in June.At that point,no other changes can be made to projects or supporting information,pending the 45-day public comment period. When do decision makers provide input on the draft project list? December 2022 -February 2023: Connect with jurisdictional and agency staff.Staff are reviewing projects and working through county coordinating committees to prioritize projects for the 2023 RTP draft project list. ODOT,TriMet,SMART and the Port of Portland have been asked to work with county coordinating meetings during this time. April-May 2023:The draft project list and assessment results will be discussed at Metro Policy Advisory Committee (MPAC),Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) and Metro Council meetings. In June 2023,JPACT and Metro Council will be asked to consider public input and technical analysis and provide direction on release of the draft RTP and list of project and program priorities for public review. When and how can members of the public give input on the project list? All projects come from previously adopted local transportation system plans or studies and strategies that have been developed with public input. In April 2023,Metro will share the draft project list and high-level assessment for feedback from community members and other stakeholders including businesses and public agencies.Engagement on the draft project list will include an online public survey,engagement led by community organizations and other engagement activities. Stakeholders will have an opportunity to provide input on the revised project list and public review draft 2023 Regional Transportation Plan during a 45-day public comment period in mid-to-late summer 2023. oregonmetro.gov/rtp 2 Exhibit 2 ASK Policy Framework for the 2023 Regional Transportation Plan 04, Call for Projects Metro On December 15, 2022,JPACT and Metro Council accepted this policy framework for the 2023 RTP Call for Projects. The Regional Transportation Plan brings city, county, regional and state priority transportation projects together to create a coordinated regional transportation priority list for the period from 2023 to 2045. It is a key step for these projects to qualify for potential state, and federal funding. All types of projects are included in the Regional Transportation Plan list-highways, key roads, transit,freight, biking and walking as well as programs. The current list includes more than 1,100 projects. This document provides more information about the policy framework that will guide updating the list of Regional Transportation Plan project and program priorities. Dramatic changes have unfolded since the RTP was last updated five years ago,many documented in the 2023 RTP Emerging Transportation Trends Study.As greater Portland continues to emerge from the disruptions of the pandemic and respond to other urgent trends and challenges,the 2023 Regional Transportation Plan update provides an opportunity for all levels of government to work together to deliver a better transportation future. An outcomes-based approach An outcomes-based approach means updating the plan's Vision project priorities guided by a vision and goals that describe what communities want greater Portland to be in the future. Measurable objectives and performance targets are used to evaluate performance over time of the Goals Objectives& Policies investments recommended in the plan and to monitor Targets how the transportation system is performing between scheduled plan updates,which occur every five years. Financial Plan Investment Strategy Figure 1 shows the elements of this outcomes-based approach. Figure 1.2023 RTP outcomes-based planning approach Vision and goals The people of greater Portland have said they want a better transportation future,no matter where they live,where they go each day, or how they get there.The vision and goals,shown in Figure 2, describe what people have said is most important to achieve with the updated RTP -more equitable transportation,a safer system,a focus on climate action and resilience,a thriving economy and options for mobility. Developed by the Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation (JPACT) and Metro Council in 2022,this vision and five goals,along with other RTP policies,will guide updating the list of RTP project and program priorities. Equitable Transportation Climate Vision--- Action and Everyone in the greater Portland region Mobility Resilience 2023 Options will have safe,reliable,affordable, RTP efficient,and climate-friendly travel GOALS options that allow people to choose to 4 drive less and support equitable,resilient, healthy and economically vibrant communities and region. Thriving Economy Figure 2. 2023 RTP vision and goals Policy Framework for the 2023 RTP Call for Projects Exhibit 2 Policy Framework for the 2023 Regional Transportation Plan Call for Projects 12/15/22 The policy framework for the Call for Projects includes: • RTP outcomes-based approach described above; • Draft 2023 RTP vision and goals developed by JPACT and Metro Council for the 2023 RTP: Goals (developed in 2022 by JPACT and Metro Council) o Equitable Transportation-Transportation system disparities experienced by Black, Indigenous and people of color and people with low incomes,are eliminated. The disproportionate barriers people of color,people with low incomes,people with disabilities,older adults,youth and other marginalized communities face in meeting their travel needs are removed. o Climate Action and Resilience- People,communities and ecosystems are protected, healthier and more resilient and carbon emissions and other pollution are substantially reduced as more people travel by transit,walking and bicycling and people travel shorter distances to get where they need to go. o Thriving Economy-An economically vibrant greater Portland region includes centers, ports,industrial areas, employment areas,and other regional destinations that are accessible through a variety of multimodal connections that help people,communities, and businesses thrive and prosper. o Safe System -Traffic deaths and serious crashes are eliminated and all people are safe and secure when traveling in the region. o Mobility Options- People and businesses can reach the jobs,goods,services and opportunities they need by well-connected,low-carbon travel options that are safe, affordable, convenient,reliable, efficient,accessible,and welcoming. • Supporting measurable objectives and performance targets that the region wants to achieve with investments in the transportation system to realize the plan's vision and goals -these will continue to be reviewed and refined in 2023; and • Supporting policies that guide planning and investment in each part of the regional transportation system to achieve the plan's vision and goals include: o 2040 Growth Concept map and supporting policies that identify priority areas and investments to support current and planned land uses,including centers, downtowns and main streets,ports,industrial areas, employment areas,and other regional destinations that are accessible through a variety of multimodal connections; o RTP transportation network maps and supporting RTP modal and design policies that designate the regional system for transit,motor vehicle,freight,bicycle and pedestrian travel and priorities for investment; o Equity Focus Areas map and supporting RTP equity policies that identify priority areas and investments to advance equity; o High Injury Corridors and Intersections map and supporting RTP safety policies that identify priority corridors to improve safety; 2 Exhibit 2 Policy Framework for the 2023 Regional Transportation Plan Call for Projects 12/15/22 o High capacity transit network map (draft) and supporting RTP policies (draft) that identify priority corridors ready for high capacity transit investment;these will continue to be reviewed and refined in 2023; o Congestion management network map and supporting RTP congestion management policies that identifies priority corridors to comprehensively manage congestion consistent with congestion management process policies in Chapter 3 of the RTP; o Draft policies related to pricing and regional mobility that will continue to be reviewed and refined in 2023; and o Other existing Chapter 3 policies that will be reviewed and may be refined in 2023. In addition to the RTP policy framework,the call for projects is informed by public engagement, adopted regional plans, strategies,policies,federal and state policies and requirements,the RTP needs assessment,the revenue forecast,and other elements as illustrated in Figure 3. Many of these elements have been under development since the adoption of the 2018 RTP. Figure 3.Elements informing the 2023 RTP call for projects State policies High-Capacity and Transit requirements Strategy Mobility }y 204 2023 Regional Transportation Pian cn]]For projectsMnaernewufth pdiry fr mewwX andappofi Equitable Policy Growth Funding Concept . Tribal Gov't Research Revenuean�h°T 40 Consultation Financial %�nf•+:rrroNn`�a r`a.am ...KW .\ Forecast Plan " An_ _ Pricing Needs Policies Commodities Community Assessment Movementm Engagement Study ., Climate Federal and Smart state policies Vision and Agency Emerging Strategy Goalsm" Trends Consultation vision Safe& d P, 2018 RTP Healthy Racial Federal policies ArterialsEquity 101111===1 policies and Framework requirements These elements come together to inform the policy framework for call for projects and provide additional information to guide how investments in roads,bridges,bikeways,sidewalks,transit service and other needs are addressed and prioritized.The elements reflect extensive engagement with local elected officials,public agencies,Tribal governments, community-based organizations, business groups and the community at large. 3 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 3 NEAR TERM PROJECTS REVENUE 2024-2030 FORECAST $ 73,792,779 TOTALS $ 66,500,000 $ 75,677,000 Estimated YOE$Cost Primary Facility Owner RTP ID Project Name Start Location End Location Description Estimated Cost (mid-point of (2023 Dollars) timeframe) McDonald Street Urban Widen roadway to a 3-lane complete street(with sidewalks,bike lanes, Tigard 11217 Hwy 99W Hall Blvd and center turn lanes where appropriate)and crossing enhancements at $ 24,700,000 $ 28,108,600.000 Upgrades some locations. 72nd Ave. Build 3-lane complete street with separated cycletracks,sidewalks,and Tigard 10755 Improvements-99W 99W Dartmouth $ 15,000,000 $ 17,070,000.000 improved pedestrian crossings.Includes new bridge over Red Rock Creek. to Dartmouth 1 Fanno Creek Construct 3 new segments of the Fanno Creek Trail and make Tigard 10766 Woodard Park Milton Court $ 10,400,000 $ 11,835,200.000 Connections Project improvements to existing segment from Ash Ave to Hall Blvd. North Dakota St(Fanno North Dakota Street at Tigard new Creek)Bridge Fanno Creek Replace bridge,with bike lanes and sidewalk. $ 7,000,000 $ 7,966,000.000 Replacement Tigard St at Fanno i Tigard 11996 Tigard St(Fanno Creek) Creek Replace bridge with bike lanes and sidewalk. $ 6,000,000 $ 6,828,000.000 Bridge Replacement Templeton-Twality Improve pedestrian crossings,complete missing sidewalk segments,pave Tigard new Safe Routes to School McDonald St Sattler St $ 2,000,000 $ 2,276,000.000 trail through East Butte Park. Improvements Downtown pedestrian Improve sidewalks,lighting,crossings,bus shelters and benches Tigard new improvements(urban Downtown $ 1,400,000 $ 1,593,200.000 throughout tTigard Downtown. renewal) 1 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 3 TE TERM PROJECTS REVENUE 2031-2045 FORECAST $ 191,182,279 TOTALS $ 123,720,000 $ 201,292,440 Estimated Cost Estimated YOE$Cost Primary Facility Owner RTP ID Project Name Start Location End Location Description (mid-point of (2023 Dollars) timeframe) Hall Blvd. Build protected bike facilities,complete sidewalks on both sides of the road,build improved pedestrian crossings.Combine and coordinate with ODOT 11220 Improvements-Locust Locust Durham $ 20,000,000 $ 32,540,000.000 to Durham ODOT State of Good Repair project and potential Washington County project north of SW Locust. Greenburg Rd Add bicycle and pedestrian facilities to Tiedeman Road and roundabout Tiedeman Ave Tiga rd 11998 Walnut St or signal at Tigard St,and improvements to Greenburg intersection. $ 20,000,000 $ 32,540,000.000 Complete Street Includes bicycle and pedestrian facilities connecting to Fanno Creek Trail. Highway 217 Ped-Bike Construct a new Highway 217 overcrossing for active transportation users connecting Metzger Neighborhood and WSRC area with the Greenburg Tigard new Crossing at SW 95th Oak Street Shady Lane $ 15,000,000 $ 24,405,000.000 Neighborhood,Tigard Heritage Trail,Fanno Creek Trail,and Downtown Ave Tigard. Hall/Hunziker/Scoffins Intersection ODOT 11223 Intersection Hall Blvd. with Hunziker Realign offset intersection to cross intersection to alleviate congestion $ 11,000,000 $ 17,897,000.000 Realignment &Scoffins and safety issues. Tigard Triangle multi- Upgrade and improve roads,improve sidewalks,lighting,crossings, Tigard 10760 modal Improvements Tigard Triangle implement curbside management strategies,bus shelters and benches $ 11,000,000 $ 17,897,000.000 (urban renewal) throughout the Tigard Triangle. Walnut Street Build complete street with sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides and Tigard 11229 Tiedeman Ave Hwy 99W ped crossing improvements;may include turn lane approaching Hwy $ 10,360,000 $ 16,855,720.000 Improvements 99W. Tigard 11408 Atlanta Street 74th Ave 69th Ave Extend Atlanta Street west to 74th Ave. $ 10,160,000 $ 16,530,320.000 Extension to 74th Ave Tigard 12088 Fanno Creek Trail Gap Bonita Road Cook Park Complete regional trail gap. $ 9,800,000 $ 15,944,600.000 (Bonita to Cook Park) ODOT 12003 Hall Blvd/Fanno Creek Over Fanno Creek in Replace bridge and add dedicated pedestrian and bicycle facilties. $ 8,400,000 $ 13,666,800.000 Bridge Tigard 2 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 3 Tigard new Ped/Bike Rail SW 95th Ave Tigard Build a railroad undercrossing for pedestrians and bicycles west of Pacific $ 5,000,000 $ 8435,000.000 Undercrossing Heritage Trail Highway(OR99W),connecting Grant Ave with 95th Ave. Tigard 12001 Hunziker St Sidewalk Hall Blvd 72nd Ave Add sidewalk on north side of Hunziker from current sidewalk end(near $ 3,000,000 $ 4,881,000.000 and Bike Lanes 7585 Hunziker)to 72nd Ave and complete bike lanes. 3 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 3 STRATEGIC PROJECTS REVENUE 2031-2045 FORECAST $ 264,975,058 TOTALS $ 264,514,000 $ 430,364,278 Primary Facility Owner RTP ID Project Name Start Location End Location Description Estimated 2023 Estimated YOE Cost Cost Pacific Highway Safety and mobility improvements,ETC treatments,boulevard King James ODOT 11666 (OR99W)Corridor 64th Ave. treatments,improved sidewalks and bike facilities,pedestrian $ 38,100,000 $ 61,988,700.000 Plan Construction PI crossings,and access management from 1-5 to King James PI. Greenburg Road North Tigard 10748 Improvements-N Hwy 217 Build complete street with separated cycle tracks and sidewalks. $ 21,500,000 $ 34,980,500.000 Dakota Dakota to Cascade Upper Boones Ferry Rd,72nd Ave,Durham Capital project to implement preferred design resulting from circulation Tigard 10768 - - $ 20,000,000 $ 32,540,000.000 Rd Circulation and and connectivity study. Connectivity 72nd Ave. Tigard 10756 Improvements- HWY 217 Bonita Road Widen to 3 lanes with bikeways and sidewalks. $ 16,256,000 $ 26,448,512.000 HWY217 to Bonita 72nd Ave. Widen to 4/5 lanes,with one travel lane in each direction,one flex Tigard new Improvements- Dartmouth HWY 217 $ 16,000,000 $ 26,032,000.000 Dartmouth to HW217 travel/parking lane,protected bike lanes and sidewalks. Pedestrian Tigard 11226 Multiple locations - Fill sidewalk gaps and construct enhanced pedestrian crossings citywide. $ 12,700,000 $ 20,662,900.000 Improvements Construct a new Highway 217 overcrossing for active transportation users Tigard new HWY 217 Ped/Bike Tigard Triangle Downtown connecting the Tigard Triangle with Downtown Tigard.May be $ 11,000,000 $ 17,897,000.000 Overcrossing coordinated with the Southwest Corridor Light Rail and the Red Rock Creek Trail. Multiple Regional Trail Gap Multiple sections on sections on Infill gaps and improve deficiencies in regional trail network. Affected Tigard new Closure and Fanno,Wash Sq Loop, Fanno,Wash trails include Fanno Creek,Washington Square Loop,Tigard-Lake-O,and $ 10,000,000 $ 16,270,000.000 Improvements and Westside Trails Sq Loop,and Westside Trails. Westside Ash Ave Ped/Bike Commerical Design and construct grade-separated pedestrian and bicycle bridge Tigard I new $ 10,000,000 $ 16,270,000.000 Bridge Burnham Street Street connecting Ash Ave across railroad. 4 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 3 Tigard-Lake-O-Red Design and construct grade separated ped/bike bridge over rail line Tigard Public Tigard new Rock Creek-Fanno Wall St connecting Wall Street and Red Rock Creek Trail to Fanno Creek Regional $ 10,000,000 $ 16,270,000.000 Library Creek Rail Overcrossing Trail. Tigard new Ash Ave Trail Walnut Place Fanno Creek Creates new active transportation connection from Walnut PI east of $ 9,000,000 $ 14,643,000.000 Connection Trail Pacific Highway(OR99W)to Ash Ave,connecting to the Fanno Creek Trail. Tigard 12006 121st Ave Complete Walnut St North Dakota Build complete street with bicycle and pedestrian facilities from Walnut $ 8,400,000 $ 13,666,800.000 Street-phase 2 St to N Dakota and provide ped and bike facilities across Summer Creek. 72nd Ave. Tigard 10757 Improvements-Bonita Bonita Road Durham Road Widen to 3 lanes with bikeways and sidewalks. $ 8,128,000 $ 13,224,256.000 to Durham Extend 74th Ave at 99W south to Hermoso/Beveland.Street to include 74th Ave extension in Hermosa/Bev Tigard 11999 Triangle End of 74th from 99W eland two travel lanes,bicycle lanes,parallel parking,sidewalks,and street $ 7,280,000 $ 11,844,560.000 trees with a 70-foot right-of-way. Hunziker&Sandburg Hunziker Rd and Kruse Way Bike/Ped Trail and bridge from Hunziker Rd and Sandburg St to Kruse Way ODOT 12016 sidepath to Kruse Way $ 7,000,000 $ 11,389,000.000 Bike/Ped Bridge Sandburg St Trail Trail in Lake Oswego. Tigard 12002 Bull Mountain Rd Roshak Rd Hwy 99W Complete gaps in sidewalks and bike lanes from Benchview Terrace $ 7,000,000 $ 11,389,000.000 Sidewalks (Tigard City Limits)to Hwy 99W. OR 99W King James Intersection improvements to maintain or improve mobility and ODOT 10770 64th Ave. $ 7,000,000 $ 11,389,000.000 Improvements PI. safety for TPR compliance and upgrading pedestrian crossings. Neighborhood Citywide neighborhood greenway bicycle network safety and facility Tigard 11221 Greenway Bicycle Multiple $ 6,020,000 $ 9,794,540.000 Improvements improvements. Between Hwy. Downtown Circulation Acquire ROW,construct streets and streetscape improvements in Tigard 11225 Downtown Tigard 99W,Hall& $ 6,020,000 $ 9,794,540.000 Plan Implementation downtown Tigard. Fanno Creek 5 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 3 Transit Supportive Support existing high frequency bus service on the Pacific Highway ODOT newentire entire (OR99W)corridor by implementing transit treatments such as bus queue $ 6,000,000 $ 9,762,000.000 Treatments on OR 99W bypass lanes and transit signal priority at key intersections. Neighborhood Trails& Construct high priority neighborhood trails to regional trails,sidewalks& Tigard 11227 Regional Trail Multiple locations - $ 4,200,000 $ 6,833,400.000 Connections transit. Ti and 12000 Tigard Safe Routes to Multiple Pedestrian upgrades,new sidewalks,new bike lanes,sidewalk infill on g - School Projects Tigard Streets facilitating walking and biking to school. $ 4,200,000 $ 6,833,400.000 Red Rock Creek Dartmouth/217 area New trail parallel along Red Rock Ck in the Triangle from Near Tigard 12008 Greenway Trail along Red Rock Ck I-5/64th Ave Dartmouth/217 to I-5. $ 4,200,000 $ 6,833,400.000 Transit Access and Access to transit and other improvements such as improved stations and ODOT,Tigard 12012 Signal Priority Various Locations - $ 3,810,000 $ 6,198,870.000 station access;possible queue jumps and signal preemption. Improvements(Tigard) Tigard new Tigard Triangle Upgrade signals throughout the Tigard Triangle with adaptive signal- - $ 3,500,000 $ 5,694,500.000 Adaptive Signals coordination technology. Washington Square Regional Center Tigard 10763 Hall Blvd. OR 217 Complete local shared-use path connection. $ 2,660,000 $ 4,327,820.000 Greenbelt Shared Use Path Washington Square Regional Center Improve sidewalks,lighting,crossings,bus shelters,and benches in the Tigard 10749 Various Various $ 2,540,000 $ 4,132,580.000 Pedestrian Washington Square area. Improvements Washington Washington Square Washington Square Square local Increase local street connections at Washington Square Center based on Tigard 10746 Connectivity local street $ 2,000,000 $ 3,254,000.000 Improvements connections street recommendations in regional center plan. connections 6 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 3 PROJECTS ON HOLD TOTALS $ 134,400,000 $ 218,668,800 Primary Facility Owner RTP ID Project Name Start Location End Location Description 2023 Cost Estimated YOE Cost OR 217 Bike/Ped New pedestrian and bicycle bridge running east/west over Hwy 217 from ODOT 10747 Overcrossing-Cascade Nimbus or Cascade Greenburg Rd Nimbus or Cascade to Scholls Ferry Road(east of 217)on the north side of $ 14,000,000 $ 22,778,000 Plaza Washington Square Regional Center. Realign Hunziker Road to meet Hampton Street at 72nd Ave,remove ODOT 10751 OR 217 Overcrossing Hunziker Road Beveland existing 72nd/Hunziker Road intersection,provide bicycle,pedestrian and $ 42,000,000 $ 68,334,000 Beveland to Hunziker transit facilities.Project to be refined based on SW Corridor High Capacity Transit recommendations. Upper Boones Ferry Road(I-5 to Durham Widen Upper Boones Ferry Rd to five lanes with bike lanes and sidewalks Tigard 10768 Road)Complete Street Interstate 5 South of from Interstate 5 through Durham Road,including additional turn lanes at $ 15,400,000 $ 25,055,800 Durham Rd intersections with Sequoia Pkwy,72nd Ave,and Durham Rd. and Intersection Improvements North Dakota/ Tigard 11224 Tiedeman Ave. N.Dakota St. Realign one street to meet the other west of the railroad $ 14,000,000 $ 22,778,000 Tiedeman Realignment I Commercial Extend Ash Avenue across the railroad tracks from Burnham to Tigard 11407 Ash Avenue Extension Burnham Street $ 14,000,000 $ 22,778,000 Street Commercial Street. 1-5 Bike/Ped 66th Ave(aligned w Southwood Dr Stub(Lake ODOT 12007 Overcrossing- Beveland)in Triangle Oswego) Ped/Bike bridge east over I-5 to Southwood in Lake Oswego with ped/bike $ 14,000,000 $ 22,778,000 Beveland to bridge. Southwood OR 217 Ped/Bike Hall Blvd near Pfaffle-North Dakota east-west connection with Hwy 217 ped/bike over- ODOT 12015 Overcrossing-N North Dakota at 217 $ 7,000,000 $ 11,389,000 Dakota to Pfaffle or at Pfaffle crossing to provide a neighborhood route. Cascade Ave, OR 217 Ped/Bike Provide Ped/bike bridge over Hwy 217 from Washington Square Regional Nimbus Ave, ODOT 12041 Overcrossing-Wash Sq Locust St Center from Locust St to Cascade Ave,Nimbus Ave,or Fanno Creek $ 14,000,000 $ 22,778,000 or Fanno Regional Center Creek Trail Regional Trail. 7 2023 RTP Draft Tigard Project List Exhibit 3 COMPLETED PROJECTS Primary Facility Owner RTP ID Project Name Start Location End Location Description Construct new street with sidewalks and bike lanes from Hunziker Road Wall St(Hunziker to Tech Center Tigard 11995 Hunziker Road (along Wall Street)to Tech Center Drive to improve freight access and Tech Center) Drive connectivity to Tigard Triangle. 121st Ave Complete Tigard 12005 Walnut St Gaarde St Upgrade to urban standards with sidewalks and bike lanes Street-phase 1 Tigard 11997 River Terrace Blvd Scholls Ferry Rd south UGB New street and trail through new River Terrace Development. 8 Exhibit 4 Schedule and deadlines January 6 Call for Projects begins— Project Hub is open for updates February 17 Deadline:Agencies update/submit new project information, including modeling details, GIS shapefiles and congestion management process documentation form, through the online RTP Hub by 5 p.m. Deadline: ODOT, TriMet, Port of Portland, City of Portland and county coordinating committees submit list of projects (in excel) to Metro staff by 5 p.m. Deadline:Agencies submit Public engagement and non-discrimination certification and documentation to Metro staff by 5 p.m. February 21 to 28 Metro reviews submittals for completeness and compiles draft project lists for review by nominating agencies February 29 to March 31 Metro staff conducts outcomes assessment and begins system, equity, climate and environmental analysis April Policymakers, regional advisory committees, community members and other stakeholders review and comment on draft priority projects and the high-level project assessment; this will include an on-line comment opportunity Metro staff prepares draft RTP and appendices, including system, equity, climate and environmental analysis May 24 Deadline:Agencies submit a letter of endorsement from their governing body (e.g., city council, board, or commission) indicating support for projects being submitted by their staff to the 2023 RTP to Metro staff by 5 p.m. May and June JPACT and Metro Council discuss results and public input, and provide feedback to Metro staff on finalizing draft plan, projects, and appendices for public review July 10 to August 24 45-day public comment period on draft RTP, project list and appendices (engagement activities will include a public hearing, online comment opportunity and other activities); comment period ends at 5 p.m. September MTAC and TPAC discuss public comments and staff recommendations for refinement of draft RTP and project list Metro Council, JPACT and MPAC discuss public comments and staff recommendations for refinement of draft RTP and project list October MTAC and TPAC consider public comments and make recommendations to MPAC and JPACT, respectively October 25 MPAC recommendation to the Metro Council November 16 JPACT considers final action and recommendation to the Metro Council November 30 Metro Council considers final action Exhibit 1 Or" January 2023 �0 2023 Regional Transportation Plan Metro 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide For agencies and jurisdictions responding to Metro's call for projects The Regional Transportation Plan brings city, county, regional and state priority transportation projects During the past year, RTP work focused together to create a coordinated regional transportation on understanding the region's priority list for the period from 2023 to 2045. It is a key transportation challenges and public priorities for investment,documenting step for these projects to qualify for potential state and in the amount of funding expected to be federal funding. available to pay for the region's transportation needs and updating the The following information is being provided to assist region's vision for the transportation agencies as they respond to the 2023 RTP Call for system. Projects. Agencies may nominate projects to the RTP Now it is time to pull the pieces together from Friday, January 6 to Friday, February 17, 2023. as we work together to address regional challenges,reflect public priorities,and DEADLINE: 5:00 P.M., Friday, February 17, 2023 maximize progress toward the region's ✓ All agencies nominating projects: Complete shared vision and goals for the future updates to project information and add new transportation system. projects electronically via the online RTP Project Hub, including new or updated project Find more information and resources geoshapefiles and a signed Congestion www.oregonmetro.gov/public- Management Process Documentation form for projects/2023-regional-transportation- relevant projects plan/projects ✓ All agencies nominating projects: Submit a signed Public engagement and non-discrimination Update projects in the RTP Project certification and documentation for projects Hub https://app.grouptrail.com/signin submitted in the 2023 Regional Transportation Plan Call for Projects (one per nominating agency) via email to Metro staff Questions? Contact Metro staff Ally Holmqvist ✓ County coordinating committees, ODOT, TriMet, ally.holmqvist@oregonmetro.gov SMART, Port of Portland, City of Portland: Submit project list recommendations in excel format via Lake McTighe email to Metro staff Lake.mctighe@oregonmetro.gov DEADLINE: 5:00 P.M., Wednesday, May 24, 2023 ✓ All agencies nominating projects: Submit a letter from governing body (e.g., council, board, commission), endorsing the agency's list of recommended projects, via email to Metro staff Send all email submissions to Ally Holmqvist at ally.holmqvist@oregonmetro.gov oregonmetro.gov/rtp Exhibit 1 Table of Contents Overview 3 Schedule and deadlines 4 Part 1:Identifying projects to update and submit to the RTP 5 What projects and programs are eligible to be included? 5 How many projects can be submitted? 6 How will project and program lists be developed and submitted? 6 How will project lists be endorsed? 7 Part 2:Using the RTP Project Hub 8 How do I access the Hub? 8 How do I save changes? 8 Who can see the changes I make? 8 How can I find a project? 8 How can I download a list of projects(also known as a report)? 9 Part 3:Adding new projects and programs to the Hub 10 Project or program name 11 Project description 12 Project status 13 Part 4:Updating project information in the Hub 14 Step 1:Adding or Changing Project Details 15 Project or program name 16 Description 16 What is the status of the project? 17 What does your pre-populated 2018 RTP project or program status mean? 18 Nominating Agency 19 Agency Partner(s) 20 Primary Owner 20 Does this project have a start and end location? 20 Time Period 20 Is the project on the financially constrained list? 21 Estimated Cost(in 2023 Dollars) 21 *Estimated(Cost in year of expenditure dollars) 22 *How much funding is already committed to the project? 23 *Have you accounted for all elements that could impact the cost estimate of the project? 23 List RTP ID Numbers(if known)of other related project phases 23 *Project features and design elements 24 What type of program? 28 Step 2:Adding or Changing Investment Categories 28 Is this a safety project or program? 29 RTP Investment Category 29 Step 3:Indicating Modeling Status and Adding or Changing Modeling Assumptions 31 Is this project new or have the modeling details been updated? 31 *Does the project add a lane of any type? 32 Does the project add bicycle infrastructure? 33 Step 4:Adding or Changing Project Status 35 *What plan or study identified the need for this project? 35 *Was the public involved in the process prioritizing this project? 35 Please upload the project or program geospatial file(zipped GIS file) 36 Have you answered all questions?If yes,is the project information updated and ready to review? 38 Additional project attributes 38 Staff and Data Resources 40 Who should I contact to coordinate updating the project list? 40 What data resources are available? 41 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 2 Exhibit 1 Overview The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) brings city, county, regional and state priority transportation projects together to create a coordinated 23-year regional transportation priority list for the period from 2023 to 2045. Projects must be in the plan to qualify for federal and some state funding. Projects in the RTP list include highways, roads, Equitable Transportation transit, freight, biking and walking, demand and system - Climate Evi i management programs. The Everyone in the in greater Portland region Action and Mobility current list includes more Resilience mit 2023 Options will have safe,reliable,affordable, than 1,200 projects RTP efficient,and climate-friendly travel GOALS options that allow people to choose to regionwide. The projects drive less and support equitable,resilient, must help achieve the 4 healthy and economically vibrant region's vision and adoptedtoollp communities and region. Th rivi n a goals for the transportation Econom system. Dramatic changes have unfolded since the RTP was last updated 2018, many documented in the 2023 RTP Emerging Transportation Trends Study. As greater Portland continues to emerge from the disruptions of the pandemic and respond to other urgent trends and challenges, the 2023 RTP coordinates all levels of government to work together to deliver a better transportation future. For more information on the policy framework and approach for updating, assessing, and refining the list of projects and programs, refer to the 2023 RTP Policy Framework Overview. The information that follows is provided to assist nominating agencies as they respond to the 2023 RTP Call for Projects. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 3 Exhibit 1 Schedule and deadlines January 6 Call for Projects begins— Project Hub is open for updates February 17 Deadline:Agencies update/submit new project information, including modeling details, GIS shapefiles and congestion management process documentation form, through the online RTP Hub by 5 p.m. Deadline: ODOT, TriMet, Port of Portland, City of Portland and county coordinating committees submit list of projects (in excel) to Metro staff by 5 p.m. Deadline:Agencies submit Public engagement and non-discrimination certification and documentation to Metro staff by 5 p.m. February 21 to 28 Metro reviews submittals for completeness and compiles draft project lists for review by nominating agencies February 29 to March 31 Metro staff conducts outcomes assessment and begins system, equity, climate and environmental analysis April Policymakers, regional advisory committees, community members and other stakeholders review and comment on draft priority projects and the high-level project assessment; this will include an on-line comment opportunity Metro staff prepares draft RTP and appendices, including system, equity, climate and environmental analysis May 24 Deadline:Agencies submit a letter of endorsement from their governing body (e.g., city council, board, or commission) indicating support for projects being submitted by their staff to the 2023 RTP to Metro staff by 5 p.m. May and June JPACT and Metro Council discuss results and public input, and provide feedback to Metro staff on finalizing draft plan, projects, and appendices for public review July 10 to August 24 45-day public comment period on draft RTP, project list and appendices (engagement activities will include a public hearing, online comment opportunity and other activities); comment period ends at 5 p.m. September MTAC and TPAC discuss public comments and staff recommendations for refinement of draft RTP and project list Metro Council, JPACT and MPAC discuss public comments and staff recommendations for refinement of draft RTP and project list October MTAC and TPAC consider public comments and make recommendations to MPAC and JPACT, respectively October 25 MPAC recommendation to the Metro Council November 16 JPACT considers final action and recommendation to the Metro Council November 30 Metro Council considers final action Exhibit 1 Part 1: Identifying projects to update and submit to the RTP What projects and programs are eligible to be included? To be included in the RTP, projects and programs must meet certain eligibility requirements consistent with the 2023 RTP policy framework. All projects, including those already in the RTP should be reviewed for consistency with the following requirements: 1. Projects must be located on at least one of the regional networks of the RTP designated regional transportation system. ! If a project location is not designated on an RTP system map, a request must be submitted to Metro to update the RTP system. All system map change requests must include an explanation for the proposed change, demonstrating how the requested change is consistent with RTP policy. The request must also list the RTP network or networks to be updated (e.g., motor vehicle, bicycle); the name of the existing or planned facility to be added; the location (starting and end point); the proposed classification(s); and the source of the proposed change (e.g., Transportation System Plan). Nominating agencies must consult with RTP staff on the proposed changes in advance of submitting the changes through the Call for Projects. 2. Projects must be within the region's Federally recognized metropolitan planning area (MPA) boundary (refer to the RTP Map Tool). 3. Projects must be in an adopted plan developed through a public process. ! If not in adopted plan, agencies must provide documentation in the Public engagement and non-discrimination certification and documentation for projects submitted in the 2023 Regional Transportation Plan Call for Projects form describing the public process underway and when the plan will be adopted. ! Note that if a project is not in a Transportation System Plan, and is not in the RTP, and adds motor vehicle capacity agencies must fill out Congestion Management Process Documentation form. 4. Project costs in 2023 dollars must be at least $2 million; smaller projects may be bundled with similar projects to meet the cost threshold such as sidewalk infill projects on multiple streets in a downtown area, seismic retrofits, transit service enhancements, minor bridge repair, or area-wide Intelligent Transportation System projects; however, these projects must still have locations that can be mapped and analyzed. 5. All throughway, roadway, bicycle and transit capital (e.g., MAX extensions, bus rapid transit, streetcar) projects that change or add capacity must be specifically identified as individual projects with modeling assumptions because they must be modeled for air quality and greenhouse gas emissions; they cannot be bundled. 6. Projects with committed funding that are not substantially complete must be included in the RTP. This includes any project or project phase(s)that 1) has had its federal or state funding awarded, but NOT fully obligated by October 1, 2023; and 2) are located 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 5 Exhibit 1 on the regional system and that will use committed local funding in local fiscal year 2023-24 (starting July 1, 2023) and beyond. How many projects can be submitted? The total cost estimates of projects, project phases, or programs identified for each list submitted must be no greater than the cost target for each agency and must total no more than the cost target identified for each time-period in the RTP. Table 1 summarizes project list cost targets for each county (including cities and special districts) and the City of Portland, ODOT, TriMet, the Port of Portland and Metro. All project lists submitted must organize projects and programs into thee three time-periods: o highest priority(2023-2030 in Constrained priorities project list), o high priority (2031-2045 in Constrained priorities project list), o additional priority (2031-2045 in Strategic priorities project list). Table 1 (under development) illustrates how cost targets for the RTP are organized for the call for projects. Table 1: Draft Cost Targets for Purposes of the 2023 RTP Call for Projects (under development; please refer to the 2023 RTP project webpage for updates on the cost targets) Constrained Constrained Strategic List Total RTP List cost List cost cost target List Agency/coordinating cost target target for target for for committee 2023-2030 2031-2045 2031-2045 for 2023- (millions of YOE (millions of YOE (millions of YOE 2045 dollars) dollars) dollars) (millions of YOE dollars) City of Portland $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 _ $0.000 Clackamas County,Cities,& $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NCPRD Multnomah County and Cities $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 _ $0.000 Washington County,Cities& $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 THPRD Oregon Dept.of Transportation $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 _ $0.000 TriMet&SMART(Transit Capital) $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Metro $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 Port of Portland $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 How will project and program lists be developed and submitted? Nominating agencies develop their project list updates. Coordination of submittals will occur through ongoing public meetings of county coordinating committees, the City of Portland, and the Transportation Policy Alternatives Committee (TPAC) as outlined in more detail below. Lead staff will each submit a list of all recommended city and county projects and programs recommended for their respective sub-region by the February 17, 2023, deadline 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 6 Exhibit 1 • Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington counties and cities within each county will recommend priority projects for their jurisdictions at county coordinating committees. County coordinating committee lead staff will manage project list submittals for the county and its cities. The policy-level county coordinating committee will be the endorsing body for the county coordinating committees (C-4 Metro Sub-committee, EMCTC, & WCCC). • The City of Portland will recommend projects after reviewing priorities with its community advisory committees—the Pedestrian, Bicycle and Freight advisory committees and the Bureau and Budget Advisory Committee. City of Portland transportation staff will manage project submittals for the city and Portland Streetcar, Inc. Portland Streetcar, Inc. staff will participate in meetings held by the City of Portland and TriMet to coordinate and develop joint project submittals. Portland City Council will serve as the endorsing body. • ODOT, the Port of Portland, TriMet, SMART and other agencies will seek feedback from county coordinating committees and the City of Portland to recommend priority projects. ODOT also will seek feedback from the Region 1 Area Commission on Transportation (ACT) to recommend priority projects. For these agencies the TriMet Board, Oregon Transportation Commission, Port Commission serve as the endorsing body; for SMART endorsement will be provided by the Wilsonville City Council. • Park districts, school districts, transportation management associations, railroad operators, and city and county trails, environmental services, and land use staff will participate in meetings held by their respective county coordinating committee or the City of Portland to coordinate and develop joint project submittals. How will project lists be endorsed? Project submittals must clearly demonstrate that local and/or state officials and relevant coordinating committees support the project. Following submittal to Metro through the coordinated process described above, all agencies also submit a letter from their governing body, such as a city council, board or commission, endorsing the list of projects that they are recommending for the RTP no later than May 24, 2023. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 7 Exhibit 1 Part 2: Using the RTP Project Hub The RTP Project Hub is an online project database for nominating agencies to use to review and submit new or updated project program information for the 2023 RTP. All projects from both the 2014 and 2018 RTPs are in the Hub. The Project Hub is currently called the 2018 RTP Project List. The name will be updated to 2023 RTP Project List when the Call for Projects concludes, and all project additions and updates have been completed. A read-only version of the Hub will also be made publicly available after the call for projects closes. Welcome to the RTP Project Hub This database stores information for projects adopted in the 2018 Regional Transportation Plan(RTP)and past plans.All projects came from adopted plans or strategies that had opportunities for public input From Jan.6 to Feb.17,2023,cities,counties and other transportation providers will work together to update their priorities for the 2023 RTP.The information in the Hub will be a starting point for this work. Many of the projects in the 2018 RTP will be updated and carried forward into the 2023 RTP.Each agency must review and update the information for their projects and add new project priorhies,by Feb.17.2023. Access information and guidance developed for the 2023 RTP Call for Projects Access the RTP Map Tool Find more information about the 2023 RTP Update My RTP Project Dashboard T PROJECTS 101 WHICH:STATUS=2023 NEW,NOT COMMITTED/2023 NEW&COMMITTED/2018 NOT COMMITTED/2018 COMMITTED/2019 COMMITTED/2014 NOT COMMITTED, .:ioF�D�NOMINATING ACEVC� 2023 RTP Call for Projects How do I access the Hub? Agencies will receive an access email with instructions to log on no later than January 6, 2023. The RTP Project Hub is at https://app.grouptrail.com/signin How do I save changes? You do not need to finish all at one time. You can make changes over time. Any changes you make are automatically saved. However, the Hub does not include prompts such as "are you sure you want to make the change?" -therefore, it is important to go back and review your work to catch errors or inadvertent changes. Who can see the changes I make? Metro staff and all people assigned to your city and county team. When the call for projects closes February 17, a view only version of the Hub will be made publicly available via Metro's website. How can I find a project? The best way to find a project is to use the search bar at the top of the Welcome page. Enter the RTP ID, a street name or other word. app.grouptrail.com/sites/20936 Advanced Metro RTP Project Hub -0111 Welcome to the RTP Project Hub 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 8 Exhibit 1 How can I download a list of projects (also known as a report)? Go to Tools in the upper right-hand corner and click on All Project Data under Run a Report to download an Excel spreadsheet. M TRACK ® BROWSE O# ADMIN A Import Workspaces ® Import Forms WAdd a Project View Log Submit a Form Run a Report © BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE MODELING DETAILS A ALL PROJECT DATA IH ROADWAY CAPACITY MODELING DETAILS A BIKE INFRASTRUCTURE MODELING REPORT A ROADWAY CAPACITY MODELING REPORT AWhen you see this symbol take care to read the instructions. This symbol indicates that extra attention is needed. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide ' Exhibit 1 Part 3: Adding new projects and programs to the Hub Nominating agencies will carry many of the projects and programs in the current (2018) RTP into the updated 2023 RTP. However, new projects and programs may have been identified in planning processes since the 2018 RTP was adopted and these need to be added to the 2023 RTP. First, confirm that the project is not already in the Hub. Click on the "2023 RTP Project List" drop down menu. My RTP Project Dashboard SHARED 'Y PROJECTS IN WHICH: STATUS = 2023 NEW, NOT COMMITTE GROUPED I3Y NOMINATING AGENCY 2023 RTP Call for Projects Then, review the projects and confirm that the new project or program is not already included in the existing list. You can also search for projects using the search function at the top of the page. Second, add the new project or program if it is not included in the Hub. Go to the top right corner of the Hub's menu bar and click on "Tools". Welcome Lake! TRACK e BROWSE TOOLS tio ADMIN Next, from the drop-down menu click on the third-down, light blue "Add a project" button. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 10 Exhibit 1 tt TRACK a BROWSE ' TOOLS # ADMIN SiImport Workspace to Tra ® Import Forms &'Add a Project Submit a Form Run a Report That will open a new window. Click in the field labeled "Enter project name" and fill out the rest of the form. When finished, click "Add a Project". Your project will be added to the list of projects. Project or program name Provide a brief, descriptive public friendly name of the project following these guidelines: • Name must be 60 characters or less, including spaces. • Must include the full name of the facility or location of the program (street, trail, or facility name, location, or area boundary). o Name throughway, roadway and bridge projects by their boundaries, from North to South and West to East, as in 1-5: Northern Terminus—Southern Terminus. o All HCT and ETC projects must start with HCT and ETC followed with a colon. o Projects on highways and throughways must start with the route number followed by a colon (e.g. OR8: Tualatin Valley Highway) • Use names of intersecting roads, rivers, streams, or landmarks instead of mile points in the project names whenever possible. If the project is a bridge, identify the body of water or structure under the bridge, and use the commonly known name. For example, Burnside Bridge (Willamette River). Do not include the structure number in the project name. • The city/county name can be in parentheses at the end of the project name to further clarify the project location, as in US26: Willamette River— 162nd (Portland) Pedestrian Crossings. • A modifier that describes the purpose of the project or program (e.g. installs bike lanes, extends street) can be included o Be as specific as possible, rather than including "improvement" use words that describe the type of facility and work (e.g., protected bikeway, bikeway update). • Avoid punctuation, abbreviations, and acronyms. Some acceptable abbreviations are Ave for avenue, Br for bridge and RR for railroad. If acronyms must be used in the 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide Exhibit 1 project name field due to the 60 character limit, spell out the acronym in the project description. Colons, parentheses, periods, forward slashes and dashes are acceptable punctuations. Do not use the following punctuations: ^'$^*_+={}!I>?<@ • If you use an acronym, spell them out in the project description. • Indicate project phase (e.g., Phase I, Phase II) if project is part of multiple phases. • It is important to retain the same name for a project throughout its life. Naming a project one way in the RTP, and another way in the MTIP or (S)TIP, and something else at the time of contract, makes it very difficult to track the project. It also makes it difficult for stakeholders such as FHWA and the general public to identify the project. • There will be times, however, when changing the name of a project is necessary. Some examples include: o Change in project scope o Combining two or more projects into a new project o Splitting existing projects into two or more new projects Examples of project/program names • Cleveland - Burnside to Stark: Complete Street • 15th Ave: Sunrise to Evergreen Bike/Ped Improvements • HCT: Division Transit NW Irving to Cleveland Park & Ride - Project Dev Next, click in the field labeled "Description". Project description Provide a brief description of the scope of the project, following these guidelines: • Description must be 250 characters or less. • Use plain language and avoid technical terms that the general public does not use. Plainlanguage.gov provides resources for writing effectively, including a list of words to avoid. • Reference other phases of the project, if there is more than one phase associated with the project. • Include information so that the public and policymakers understand the purpose and desired outcome of the project or program, such as the benefits of the project or program (e.g., increase pedestrian visibility, reduce number and severity of crashes); the reason for the project (e.g., high number of serious crashes at the intersection); plan or study that identified the project; links to other relevant projects; list design elements; milestones and deliverables. Examples of descriptive project descriptions include • Widen from two lanes to four lanes from Purdy Street to Ramsay Street with turn lanes and signals at intersections, ADA curb ramps, marked crossings, sidewalks, bike lanes, and traffic signal coordination. • Implement comprehensive traffic management plan to improve traffic flow, including three new traffic signals between 1-205 and 158th Avenue, better signalization, message signs, fiber optic interconnection and communication with central computer. • Reconstruct and widen road to five lanes from the Columbia Slough to the Marine Drive overpass, including bike lanes, sidewalks and vegetated buffer of adjacent trail and 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 12 Exhibit 1 natural resource area. The project also signalizes the intersection of the T-6 entrance at Marine Drive to improve safety. • Expand and/or upgrade transit stations and park-and-ride lots in various locations, including the River District, St. Johns, Lents, Hollywood, Parkrose, Hillsdale and Barbur transit centers. • Boulevard retrofit of street from 15th Avenue to 24th Avenue including wider sidewalks, curb extensions, safer crossings, street trees and traffic signals. Project status For new projects or programs, select one of the following from the drop-down list: • 2023 New & Committed - Indicates a new project that was NOT identified on the 2018 RTP Project list for which the agency has been awarded funding not to be fully obligated by Oct. 1, 2023, and therefore must be included in the draft 2023 RTP Constrained project list as follows: o Any project or project phases that has had its federal or state funding awarded, but NOT fully obligated by October 1, 2023, should be included in your 2023-2030 Constrained project list. o Any project or project phases located on the regional system and that will use committed local funding in local fiscal year 2023-24 (starting July 1, 2023) and beyond should be included in your Constrained project list in the appropriate time period. Examples of committed or awarded funding include: o formally declared local funding (via Council action), or o awarded state or federal funding, such as through the federal discretionary programs (e.g., IIJA), ODOT STIP Enhance funding, or the 2025-27 RFFA process; or o local committed funding (MSTIP, SDCs, etc.) • 2023 New, Not Committed - Indicates a new, unfunded project that was NOT identified on the 2018 RTP Project list. Next, click the orange "Add a project" button in the bottom left corner. o Your project will be added to the list of projects. o Find the newly created project in the list of projects and complete the required information as directed in the next section. o Repeat these steps for each new project or program. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 13 Exhibit 1 Part 4: Updating project information in the Hub For projects included in the 2018 RTP, some data has been pre-populated in the HUB for convenience (e.g., previously provided information, escalated costs in 2023 dollars). For these existing projects, much of the information will already be available, but some information will need to be updated or added related to new questions. Information to be confirmed for existing projects and collected for new projects that will be used to organize, summarize; conduct system, equity, climate and environmental analysis; and assess outcomes of the projects includes: • agency information • general project information • summary of public engagement • estimated project cost in 2023 dollars • time-period for completion • project type and investment category • modeling assumptions • spatial data. APlease review and confirm all fields for all projects—new and previously included in the 2018 RTP—to ensure that all information is correct and up to date. Some questions have been added to the Hub and will be blank for all projects and some questions have changed, meaning that the prior Hub information may need to be revised. In this document these questions are indicated by an "*". First, click on the "2023 RTP Project List" drop down menu. My RTP Project Dashboard SHARED T PROJECTS IN WHICH:STATUS =2023 NEW,NOT COMMITTE GROUPED BY NOMINATING AGENCY 2023 RTP Call for Projects All 2018 RTP projects and any newly added projects (through the process described in the previous section) will be listed in alphabetical order, typically by jurisdiction. Use the "Filter" on the left to sort projects in different ways. You may also find projects using the search function at the top of the page. Click on the project or program you would like to review, change or add information to. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 14 Exhibit 1 Group by:Nominating Agency(select only one) _ 0 Fist form l Pooch dpdnle -®Browse Filter by Update MEMO(21) Project Info updated', + Any 0 I Additional CQ Additional CQ Additlonal CQ Additional Ck Ad60ionel Q Additional Ci Corridor Regional MPO Regional Safe Regional TOO Regional gravel Regional ISMS F Investment Areas Activhies for Routes to School Investments for Options Activities corridors Priam), Status(select F ( y one) Activities for 2028-2040 Activities for 2028-2040 for 2020-2040 Investments for lI 2028-2040 2025-2040 2020-2040 4 selected - 'x,ned MS Mayan,2018 a, Updated Apr 29.2619 at .26 r - and ryi IP,2ole:, ss PM uyaaua Apr 29,NIP at Nominating Agency(select only one) Sae.ei as cm as PM s Metro Agency Partner(e) Corridor Areas ARecgivoiaels MfPrO ARecgnesl MfoPrO RHeoguitoennatlo SSactehool Q Regional o SScatehool IRnevgeisontmael nTtsOO for I,Rae,e Any Activilles for 20/8-2027 2028-2040 Program for 2010- Program for 2020- 2010-2027 2r 2028-2040 - 2027 2040 =—da ,,,.d „dad 11 19as Upaaled Aprze.moa at Updated Apr 29.zutea, 12021 12022 Updated Apr 2t.2012 a, ur Armory Owner lselcct only one) zr.Pots a, avers as am o,Aprzo,201ea, 29,2018a, <d em At the top you will find the project name and RTP ID. ADO NOT CHANGE THE RTP ID FIELD. The RTP ID is a unique 6-digit code that is assigned by Metro to track projects in the Regional Transportation Plan. This is pre-populated for projects and programs that were included in the 2018 RTP, while new projects will be assigned a unique 6-digit code by Metro staff. Metro TEST Project- RTPID- 12345 PROGRESS SNAPSHOT 0 MODELING FORMS Step 1: Adding or Changing Project Details To add or change project or program detail information, navigate to the "Tasks" tab. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 15 Exhibit 1 B TASKS r PROGRESS SNAF ® My tasks CI 2023 RTP Project Solicitation PROJECT DETAILS II What Is the status of the protect? [2023 New, Not Committed] O Nominating Agency [Metro] D Agency Partner(s) [Ail Jurisdictions] 11 Primary Owner [To be determined] D Does this project have a start and end location? [Yes] ❑ Protect Start Location Q / Click to edit Project or program name Refer to the section above on guidance for naming projects and programs. Update the name of the project or program if it does not meet the guidance. To change the name of a project or program go to the top of the project "workspace" and click on the Project name. Enter the updated name and click the check mark. Metro TEST Project I.. 12345 ■ - 1 5' Metro TEST Proje0 12 Q =I7 122155 Description Refer to the section above on guidance for project descriptions. Update the project or program description if it does not meet the guidance. To change the description, go to the Progress Snapshot tab. Enter the updated description in the text box. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 16 Exhibit 1 l• PROGRESS SNAPSHOT l MODELING FORMS ® FILES / ADDITIONAL PROJECT ATTRIBUTES DESCRIPTION N Test project to work through the kinks of the Hub.Will provide for a better experience for project partners. Conducted by Metro staff in the lead up to the Call for Projects 1 00% TAGS Status 2023 New,Not Committed What is the status of the project? The year listed in the RTP status is used to indicate when the project was first added to the RTP, starting with the 2014 RTP. Some 2018 RTP projects have a status of 2014 Committed and 2014 Not Committed because they were carried over from the 2014 RTP to the 2018 RTP. For projects and programs included in the 2018 RTP that have been completed since 2018, the project status has been updated already. ADo not change the status for projects or programs included in the 2018 RTP unless you are putting the project on hold(i.e., not including it in the 2023 RTP) ! For new projects or programs, you will have identified the status when adding the project or program. For those new projects and programs confirm that the status is either 2023 New & Committed or 2023 New, Not Committed. ! If there are any projects or programs in the 2018 RTP that you will not be including in the 2023 RTP, and that are not marked as 2018 Completed or 2014 Completed or 2018 On Hold or 2014 On Hold, update the status to 2018 On Hold or 2014 On Hold. If you do not update the status, they will be included in the 2023 RTP project list. ! For all other projects: Do not change the status. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 17 Exhibit 1 What does your pre-populated 2018 RTP project or program status mean? • 2018 Completed - Indicates a project for which the construction/program implementation phase has been completed and the facility or program is open for use or no further obligations or federal actions are required after Oct. 1, 2023. • 2018 On Hold - Indicates a project that was identified on the 2018 RTP project list, has no committed funding, doesn't fit within RTP cost targets or is no longer a priority, and, therefore, is not currently recommended for inclusion in the draft 2023 RTP project list. • 2018 or 2014 Committed - Indicates a project that was identified on the 2018 RTP Project list, for which the agency has been awarded funding that was not fully obligated by Oct. 1, 2023, and therefore must be included in the draft 2023 RTP Constrained project list as follows: 1. Any project or project phase(s) that has had its federal or state funding awarded, but NOT fully obligated by October 1, 2023, must be included in your 2023-2030 Constrained project list. Revenue cost targets exclude project costs for projects obligated on or before October 23, 2023. However, these projects must remain in the RTP and MTIP until they are substantially complete. Substantially complete means the project is operational and the Agency is in the process of closing it out, or waiting to resolve a few more items before closing it out (such as a planting season or a contractor dispute). This ensures that if the project is awarded additional funds (in particular if these are federal funds) even during construction after the construction phase has been obligated it is still in the RTP and MTIP. 2. Any project or project phases located on the regional system and that will use committed local funding in local fiscal year 2023-24 (starting July 1, 2023) and beyond must be included in your Constrained project list in the appropriate time period. Examples of committed or awarded funding include: o formally declared local funding (via Council action), or o awarded state or federal funding, such as through the federal discretionary programs (e.g., TIGER, FASTLANE, BUILD), ODOT STIP Enhance funding, the 2025-27 RFFA process; or local committed funding (MSTIPe, SDCs, etc.) • 2018 or 2014 Not Committed - Indicates a project that was identified on the 2018 RTP project list, has no committed funding, and is recommended for inclusion in the draft 2023 RTP project list. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 18 Exhibit 1 Nominating Agency The nominating agency is the public agency that is submitting the project or program to the 2023 RTP for consideration. Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) submit projects in coordination with a transportation agency. Nominating agencies are responsible for updating and submitting required project information to Metro via the online RTP Project Hub, including new or updated geoshapefile information and the public engagement and non-discrimination certification and documentation. In those cases when the nominating agency is different from the facility owner, the nominating agency will be responsible for updating and submitting required project information in coordination with the facility owner as needed to ensure accurate information is provided. It does not indicate financial commitment to the project. A nominating agency must be identified. Select the appropriate nominating agency from the drop-down list • ODOT • Metro • Clackamas County • Multnomah County • Washington County • TriMet • SMART • Port of Portland • Beaverton • Cornelius • Durham • Fairview • Forest Grove • Gladstone • Gresham • Happy Valley • Hillsboro • Johnson City • King City • Lake Oswego • Milwaukie • Oregon City • Portland • Rivergrove • Sherwood • Tigard • Troutdale • Tualatin • West Linn • Wilsonville • Wood Village 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 19 Exhibit 1 • Tualatin Hills Parks & Recreation District • North Clackamas Parks & Recreation District Agency Partner(s) The public agencies that will help implement the project through planning, project development and/or construction. Agencies are encouraged to coordinate when proposing projects. Partners may also contribute funding to help implement the project. Select all agency partners from the list or "N/A"if not applicable. • All eligible nominating agencies listed above. • Railroad operators (e.g., Union Pacific, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Portland & Western) are eligible as part of a joint project with a local government, Metro, ODOT or transit provider (in coordination with transportation agencies and county coordinating committees). Primary Owner A primary owner is the public agency with primary ownership of the project right-of-way and/or facility, or primary authority over a program. While some projects may have more than one facility owner involved, agencies should identify the primary owner, that is the agency that is most responsible and/or has the most ownership. Primary facility owners may be any of the nominating agencies or agency partners listed under nominating agencies, or a railroad authority, or Transportation Management Association (TMA). If the primary owner is not determined, select 'to be determined'. Select the primary owner from the drop-down list. Does this project have a start and end location? Answer "yes" for capital investments, including linear projects such as "Hall Blvd: Locust to Durham Bikeways" that will have a clear start and end point and area projects, such as intersections, transit stations or facility buildings. Answer "no" for programs that do not have a physical location or do not yet have a specific physical location identified "Transit Signal Priority Improvements (Portland)." Click to edit to enter the start and end location of the project in each of the appropriate text boxes. • Project Start/End Location— For projects answering "yes", identify the project extent from North to South and/or from West to East. These must be consistent with the project name. o Start location—the beginning of the project limit or location of a spot improvement o End location—the end of the project limit Time Period 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 20 Exhibit 1 The 2023 RTP is effective immediately upon adoption by JPACT and the Metro Council; the Council action is scheduled for November 30, 2023. The plan is effective for five years from the date of adoption. The plan must be updated every five years. Consistent with the adopted RTP work plan, the investment strategy includes two horizon years: Select the time period from the drop-down list. • 2023-2030 to identify near-term priorities to meet the most immediate needs • 2031-2045 to identify longer-term priorities to meet other regional needs Indicate which of the two time periods (2023-2030 or 2031-2045 to match the revenue forecast years) the project is expected or recommended for construction/implementation. If"2023- 2030" is selected, you must answer Yes to the question "is the project on the financial constrained list" and must fit within your project cost target. Is the project on the financially constrained list? The investment strategy also organizes projects based on the financially constrained revenue forecast and policy priorities of the RTP. Select Yes or No from the drop-down list. • Constrained priority projects (both 2023-2030 and 2031-2045) fit within the RTP financial forecast cost target (i.e., "RIP budget"). For projects to be eligible to receive federal and state funding, they must be on this list. o Select "yes" if your project or program is on the list for which funding has been committed or is recommended to be implemented with funding the region currently expects to have available. • Additional strategic priority projects (2031-2045) the region should work together to develop funding for and construct. o Select "no" if your project or program is on the list for which funding is not currently anticipated. Estimated Cost (in 2023 Dollars) Review and update if appropriate costs for existing projects and programs and add costs for new projects or programs. Click to review, confirm, change, or add estimated cost. Please use this format: $2,000,000 • Costs should be in 2023 dollars. Costs for projects included in the 2018 RTP have been updated to 2023 dollars by inflating the previous 2016 costs by 40% based on transportation industry cost data. o Review and confirm the cost estimate is appropriate for the project. o If the project definition has changed due to project development activities or other reasons and a refined cost estimate is more appropriate, please provide a 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 21 Exhibit 1 modified cost (in 2023 dollars). Upload a document providing a short explanation of the reason for the modified cost estimate under the "Files"tab of the Hub. • Project costs must be $2,000,000 or more. • Project costs must account for all elements that could impact the cost of the project. For projects included in the 2018 RTP, consider whether there are changes to the scope or other details not previously accounted for that would influence the overall cost beyond inflation escalation, such as: o Costs associated with right of way, utilities and stormwater. o Intelligent Transportation Systems, System or Demand Management elements. o All phases of the project (if not separated out into separate projects) including planning, preliminary engineering, right of way acquisition, utilities, construction. o For projects expected to use federal funds: ■ Project management to address federal aid process requirements. Non- certified agencies will need to have the project budget provide reimbursement to their project delivery agency (ODOT or another certified agency). Certified agencies can incorporate these costs into other project cost elements but should indicate how they have done so. ■ NEPA process costs and project mitigation design elements ■ Meeting federal ROW procedural and cost requirements beyond local agency process ■ Construction engineering/traffic management requirements beyond local agency process • Round project costs to the nearest $100,000. • For projects with an anticipated completion date in 2030 or sooner, nominating agencies must provide documentation of cost estimation. o Nominating agencies may use Metro's Project Cost Estimate Workbook (available on the 2023 RTP project webpage) or use a comparable cost estimate methodology to update project costs for all capital projects. o Add the completed Metro or other worksheet to the "Files" tab of the Project Hub, with the following naming protocol: RTP-ID#-cost-estimate-worksheet. *Estimated (Cost in year of expenditure dollars) Federal rules require project costs to be provided for in year-of-expenditure (YOE) dollars to account for the impacts of inflation. ODOT and statewide MPO staff have forecasted a 3.3% annual inflation rate for transportation projects for the purposes of long-range planning forecasts based on recent historical data. Click to add estimated cost in YOE. • For projects identified for implementation in the 2023-2030 timeframe please multiply the 2023 cost estimate by 1.138 to reflect a cost inflated to 2027, the mid-year of this timeframe. For projects identified for implementation in the 2031-2045 timeframe multiply the 2023 cost by 1.627 to reflect a cost inflated to 2038, the mid-year of this 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 22 Exhibit 1 timeframe. This reflects an approach that generally assumes projects are implemented evenly over the planning period and shares the inflationary costs equally among projects in each of the two time periods for project analysis. • If choosing a different cost methodology more appropriate to the project or program year of expenditure costs, provide the year-of-expenditure cost estimate to this question and upload a short explanation of the cost method to the "Files" tab of the Project Hub. • Round project costs to the nearest $100,000. *How much funding is already committed to the project? A revenue forecast of funds expected to be available for project costs during the planning period, accounting for new revenues from 2024 through 2045. The project costs submitted for the RTP need to reflect the total cost of the project or program, including those already committed. Click to add amount of funding committed to the project; if none, enter$0. Please use this format:$2,000,000. • If a project or program is submitted that has funding already committed to it from prior to fiscal year 2024, identify that revenue amount so that it can be added to funding available for the project. • Metro staff will coordinate with agencies whose projects have received funding awards from regional, state or federal sources within the planning period, such as the 2025-27 Regional Flexible Funds Allocation. *Have you accounted for all elements that could impact the cost estimate of the project? Project costs must account for all elements that impact the cost. (e.g., preliminary design, final design and engineering, right-of-way acquisition). Select Yes or No from the drop-down list. • If you have included all expected project cost elements into your cost estimate, select "yes". • If you have not yet included all expected project cost elements, select "no" and upload a document providing a short explanation under the "Files" tab of the Hub titled "RTP-ID- #-cost-elements-explanation" List RTP ID Numbers (if known) of other related project phases List the ID#of other projects submitted to the 2023 RTP (including any already included in the 2018 RTP) that represent other phases of the project (e.g, 11398, 51345). Projects that cost more than $25 million are encouraged to be submitted as discrete phases of project development (e.g., preliminary design, final design and engineering, right-of-way acquisition, and construction) and/or smaller, logical segments. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 23 Exhibit 1 Click to add ID numbers of related projects[Enter only numbers. Separate more than one RTP number by a comma and then a space (e.g., 11398, 51345)] *Project features and design elements Identify all features relevant to the project design. Any features or design elements that change roadway capacity or add bicycle infrastructure should be reflected in the modeling assumptions form (see Step 3 below). Projects may have design elements in different categories (e.g., roadway, freight and pedestrian). Select all that apply from the drop-down list. Feature/Element Definition Pedestrian Features and Elements Buffer treatment and benches Adds features that increase access and comfort for people walking and rolling on sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities,including landscaped buffers from the roadway and/or street furniture like benches. Lighting intersections&marked Adds treatments to a crossing of roadways that make it visible to both the person crossings driving and walking or rolling, including markings and lighting. Overpass or underpass Adds a physically separated crossing of a roadway or throughway for people walking and rolling. Priority intersection Adds treatments to the crossing of roadways that increase the safety of people walking treatments/raised median or rolling and/or give them priority, including median refuge islands and/or pedestrian island head-start signal timing. Pedestrian signal or beacon Adds a signal or beacon to a crossing of roadways making it more visible to both the person driving and walking or rolling from farther away compared to traditional transverse line-marked crosswalks, including a traffic signal, High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk[HAWK] beacon,or Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon [RRFB]). Sidewalk infill Adds sidewalk to fill a gap in the existing network. Universal access and ADA Adds new or upgrades facilities consistent with the American with Disabilities Act compliance requirements. Sidewalk improvements(not Reconstructs and or upgrades existing sidewalks, including adding curb cuts and/or infill) sidewalk widening. Other Other features and design elements not covered under any other categories. Bicycle Features and Elements Bicycle boulevards Adds traffic calming and crossing features to a low traffic street to enhance bicycle safety and convenience by providing direct routes that allow free-flow travel for bicyclists with traffic controls at major intersections, as well as sharrows,signage,and safety elements such as median islands,signal modifications, and lighting. Bicycle parking Adds parking for bicycles including staples or corrals at transit stations or centers, plazas,at the curb,or other locations. On-street bikeway or bike lane Adds a conventional striped bicycle lane to the roadway without physical separation or buffered striping. Overpass or underpass Adds a physically separated crossing of a roadway or throughway for people bicycling. Priority treatments at Adds treatments to the crossing of roadways that increase the safety of people intersections&crossings bicycling and/or give them priority, including bike boxes,green paint, bicycle signals and/or traffic signal priority,and protected intersection designs. Buffered bikeways Adds a striped bicycle lane to the roadway with a painted buffer between it and motor vehicle travel lanes. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 24 Exhibit 1 Feature/Element Definition Protected bikeways/ Adds a bicycle lane, path,or cycletrack with physical barriers and/or grade separation cycletracks from motor vehicle travel lanes. Restriping/Maintenance Maintains existing bikeway facilities through restriping or other activities. Other Other features and design elements not covered under any other categories. Trail Features and Elements New trail/multi-use path or Adds or extends an existing trail or multi-use path to create a new connection for extension people walking, rolling,and bicycling that is physically-separated from the roadway. Treatments(pull-outs, seating, Adds features that increase access and comfort for people walking, rolling,and wayfinding) bicycling on trails such as wayfinding, pull-outs and/or seating. High visibility trail street Adds treatments to a crossing of a trail and a roadway that are more visible to both the crossings driver and pedestrian from farther away compared to traditional transverse line- marked crosswalks,such as patterns(i.e., bar pairs,continental, ladder),elevation, and/or lighted signage(e.g., High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk [HAWK] signal, Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon [RRFB]). Other Other features and design elements not covered under any other categories. Transit Features and Elements New rail infrastructure/ Adds new rail tracks to create a new or extend an existing line or route to create a new connection transit connection. New rapid bus infrastructure/ Adds transit capacity,speed,and reliability features(e.g.,dedicated space in the connection roadway,articulated buses,station and stop improvements)to upgrade an existing frequent service route to create a new high-capacity transit connection. New bus or shuttle line/ Adds a new bus or shuttle line or route to create a new transit connection. connection New vehicles Adds new buses,articulated buses, rail cars, or other vehicles to the fleet, including replacement of standard buses with electric buses. Transit center,stop or station Adds station or stop features such as shelters, pads, passenger boarding areas, lighting, real-time arrival information,and/or information kiosks. Includes electric vehicle charging and other infrastructure needed to support electrification of the fleet. Park and rides Parking garages or lots for motor vehicles at transit centers. Enhanced transit corridor Moderate cost capital and operational treatments that improve transit capacity, investment reliability and travel time along major Frequent Service bus lines.These may include changes to the design and operation of streets and signals,typically owned and operated by the city,county or ODOT(e.g.,transit signal priority and signal improvements,dedicated bus or BAT lanes, queue jump lanes,traffic flow modifications,curb extensions at stops).They may also include changes to transit vehicle fleet,station equipment and operation systems typically owned and operated by TriMet or SMART(e.g., rolling stop modification,stop consolidation, headway management, all door boarding, larger vehicles). Other priority/enhanced transit Other capital investments that support transit operations such as new technologies toolbox designs supporting payment options or information sharing. New service Adds service to improve existing transit lines, such as increased bus or rail frequency/headways. Other operations Funding that supports the operation of light rail,commuter rail, bus rapid transit, streetcar, bus,shuttle, and the tram,such as fuel,computer-aided dispatch,and/or automatic vehicle location. Maintenance Funding for preventive maintenance of fleet and facilities and transit vehicle replacement and infrastructure repair to keep the system in a state of good repair. Other Other features and design elements not covered under any other categories. Freight Features and Elements 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 25 Exhibit 1 Feature/Element Definition Signal priority,freight-only Modifies the design and operation of streets and/or signals to improve freight lanes, queue jumps capacity, reliability and travel time,such as signal priority,and/or time extension, and/or freight-only lanes,and/or queue jumps. Loading zones Designates restricted,temporary,and/or timed space in travel lanes,shoulders, or parking at the curb for freight and/or passenger loading and unloading. Turning radius designs Modification or widening of intersection and/or crossing turning radii to accommodate larger freight vehicles. Grade separate freight modes Grade separates freight from another road, rail or throughway to reduce conflict with other users and/or improve freight travel time and reliability. Improved rail crossing Reconstruction, realignment, upgrade,and/or modification of a rail crossing to improve operations and/or safety, including speed upgrades and/or new safety features. New connection Adds a new or extension of an existing freight route road or railway, including new track or double tracking. Maintenance Preservation and maintenance to keep freight route road and railways in a state of good repair, including pavement resurfacing, preventive maintenance, preservation and rehabilitation. Operations Roadway treatments that support operations on freight railways and/or optimize truck operations on freight routes,without increasing capacity,such as height clearances. Other Other features and design elements not covered under any other categories. Roadway Features and Elements New general purpose lane(s) Adds a new lane for motor vehicle travel on a roadway, including new turn lanes and center turn lanes. Bus lane Repurposes an existing motor vehicle lane for bus only use on a roadway. Toll lane An existing motor vehicle lane on a roadway that is tolled as a means of regulating access. New road/roadway extension Adds a new roadway or extension of an existing roadway. Reconstruction/realignment Reconstruction or realignment of an existing roadway,generally including sub-grade work. Road widening A lateral expansion of the currently maintained footprint, or lateral expansion of the roadway and/or the acquisition of additional right-of-way for road construction on a roadway. New bridge,widening existing Addition of a new bridge structure or widened bridge structure carrying a roadway, bridge throughway, or railroad across a river, ravine, road, railroad, or other obstacle to connect the system. Bridge Reconstructs and/or realigns a new bridge structure carrying a roadway,throughway, reconstruction/realignment or railroad across a river, ravine, road, railroad,or other obstacle to connect the system. Bridge seismic retrofit Seismic retrofits for small/local bridges and ODOT bridge rehabilitation projects. Bridge maintenance Preservation and maintenance to keep bridges in a state of good repair, including pavement resurfacing, preventive maintenance, preservation and rehabilitation. New interchange Addition of a new minor roadway or lanes that connect two or more throughways,a throughway and major roadway,or a throughway and local streets(e.g.,diamond, cloverleaf). Arterial inter. designs,gateway Reconstructs, realigns, makes modifications and/or adds gateway features to an treatments existing intersection of an arterial roadway(s). Intersection design changes Reconstructs, realigns,and/or makes modifications to an existing intersection of two or more roadways. Seismic retrofit Seismic retrofits for small/local bridges and ODOT bridge rehabilitation projects. Repair, modification,and/or upgrade of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity,ground motion, or soil failure due to earthquake activity. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 26 Exhibit 1 Feature/Element Definition Safety treatments, reduce Design elements to separate modes and increase safety, including adding medians, modal conflicts roundabouts,guardrails, median barriers,crash cushions,speed management; Highway Safety Improvement Program implementation; Emergency relief(23 U.S.C. 125). Safety treatments Safety countermeasures such as reflective backplates,safety edge,enhanced curve delineation,skid treatments, increasing sight distance,safety roadside rest areas, and rumble strips;speed management; projects that correct, improve, lighting treatments, emergency truck pullovers,or eliminate a hazardous location or feature; Railroad/highway crossing warning devices; Highway Safety Improvement Program implementation; Curb and stormwater drainage Adds facilities, upgrades, makes modifications to,and/or repairs storm sewers, drainage systems or drainage patterns to address safety issues, increase capacity, and/or improve water flows or quality. Road diet, removal of general Removes motor vehicle capacity from the roadway through a "road diet", removal of a purpose lane, or adding diverter general purpose travel lane,or addition of a diverter, usually maintaining or even increasing capacity for people walking, rolling, bicycling and/or using transit. Maintenance Preservation and maintenance to keep roadways in a state of good repair, including pavement resurfacing, preventive, maintenance,preservation and rehabilitation. Operations Roadway treatments that support operations,where capacity impacts are at most minor, including channelization,turn restrictions,speed reduction, reducing the number of lanes, repurposing space(without adding lanes)or make other improvements for reducing conflicts and increasing safety for all roadway users. Other Other features and design elements not covered under any other categories,such as fencing. Throughway Features and Elements New interchange Addition of a new minor roadway or lanes that connect two or more throughways,a throughway and major roadway,or a throughway and local streets(e.g.,diamond, cloverleaf),adds capacity. Interchange design changes Changes to an existing minor roadway or lanes that connect two or more throughways, a throughway and major roadway,or a throughway and local streets(e.g.,diamond, cloverleaf)that repurpose space,add capacity. New connection Adds a new throughway or extension of an existing throughway,adding capacity. Widening A lateral expansion of the currently maintained footprint, or lateral expansion of the throughway and/or the acquisition of additional right-of-way for road construction on a throughway. New general purpose lane(s) Adds a new lane for motor vehicle travel on a throughway adding capacity. New auxiliary lane(s) Adds a new auxiliary lane for motor vehicle traffic on a throughway adding capacity. Bus lane Repurposes an existing motor vehicle lane for bus only use on a throughway;changes capacity. Toll lane An existing motor vehicle lane on a throughway that is tolled as a means of regulating access;changes capacity. Removes or separates auxiliary Removes an auxiliary lane, reducing the overall number of throughway lanes,or lane physically separates an existing auxiliary lane from the throughway;changes capacity. Maintenance Preservation and maintenance to keep throughways in a state of good repair, including pavement resurfacing, preventive maintenance, preservation and rehabilitation. Operations Throughway treatments that support operations,where capacity impacts are at most minor, including channelization,turn restrictions,speed reduction, reducing the number of lanes, repurposing space(without adding lanes)or make other improvements for reducing conflicts and increasing safety for all roadway users. Other Other features and design elements not covered under any other categories,such as fencing. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 27 Exhibit 1 Feature/Element Definition TDM/TSMO/Other Features and Elements ITS elements Features supporting transportation system operations and efficiency, including ITS systems, ramp metering,vehicle charging stations traffic signal coordination, real-time data collection and use,communications infrastructure,software purchases. Access management/demand Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects, management including strategies for active traffic management,medians,separated lanes and access management,and high occupancy vehicle and toll lanes. Multimodal Traffic Strategies and programs designed to reduce demand for roadway travel, particularly Management single occupant vehicle trips,through various means(e.g.,education, outreach, marketing, incentives or disincentives,technology, policy).These include regional travel options programs, paid and timed parking in centers,encourage walking, biking, use of transit,van and carpooling,carsharing, ridesharing, and alternative work hours and telecommuting. Traffic Incident Management Real-time traveler information regarding traffic conditions, incidents,delays,travel times, alternate routes,weather conditions, construction,or special events. Traveler Information Commuter and individualized marketing programs. Other: Program Programmatic activities supporting a capital project,such as those for traffic demand management or safe routes to school. What type of program? If project does not have a start and end location (answers no to "Does this project have a start and end location") and is not a capital project. Identify the type (e.g., program) and scale (e.g., corridor, citywide, countywide, regionwide, or state) from the drop-down list. Examples include a transportation demand management (TDM) project or transit service operations and related "operating" capital (such as transit vehicle replacements and purchases or maintenance facilities). Select the type of program from the drop-down list. • Corridor program • Citywide program • Countywide program • Regionwide program • State program Step 2: Adding or Changing Investment Categories To add or change project or program Investment Category information go to the section with that title in the "Tasks" tab. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 28 Exhibit 1 Ef TASKS r PROGRESS SNAPSHOT 0 MODELING FORMS iy tasks 2023 RTP Project Solicitation ECT DETAILS INVESTMENT CATEGORY What is the status of the project? [2023 New - Q Is this a safety project or program? [Yes] Q Not Committed] RTP Investment Category [Active Transportation- Nominating Agency [Metro] = Pedestrlan/8lcycle] Agency Partner(s) [A!IJurlsdlctions] Primary Owner [Tobe determined] =• Is this a safety project or program? Safety projects and programs are identified by agencies in safety action plans and other plans and studies. Safety projects have the primary purpose of preventing and reducing fatal and serious injury crashes addressing a documented safety problem at a documented high injury or high-risk location (including Regional High Injury Corridors and Intersections) with one or more proven safety countermeasure(s). Select Yes or No from the drop-down list. Answer "yes" if the following apply: A safety problem (occurrence and risk of fatal and serious injury crashes) has been identified and documented through an analysis of crash and risk data in safety plans or other plans and studies; and the project or program addresses the identified safety problem using proven safety countermeasures such as road diets, medians and pedestrian crossing islands, pedestrian hybrid beacons, roundabouts, access management, reflective backplates, safety edge, enhanced curve delineation, and rumble strips, or programs such as Safe Routes to School, messaging and behavioral programs. More information about these and other proven countermeasures can be found at: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/provencountermeasures and www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/TRAFFIC-ROADWAY/docs/pdf/CRFAppendix.pdf. These criteria are consistent with those of the ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program (www.oregon.gov/odot/Engineering/ARTS/Criteria.pdf). RTP Investment Category RTP Investments categories group projects and programmatic investments by the primary transportation network and primary purpose of the project or program. If a project or program makes investments in multiple modes, please select the category that describes the most significant portion of the project. Select the appropriate investment category from the drop-down list. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 29 Exhibit 1 Investment Category Description Active Transportation Pedestrian Capital projects primarily addressing pedestrian or people with disabilities needs.Sidewalks, off-street trails, modernize street and intersection designs to reduce conflicts and better serve people walking. Bicycle Capital projects primarily addressing bicyclist needs. Protected and/or separated bike lanes, off-street trails, modernize street and intersection designs to reduce conflicts and better serve people biking. Pedestrian/Bicycle Capital projects addressing both pedestrian and bicyclist needs. Protected and/or separated bike lanes,sidewalks,crosswalks and curb ramps on major streets,off-street trails, modernize street and intersection designs to reduce conflicts and better serve people walking and biking. Roadways Freight Capital projects primarily addressing freight access needs. Road and railroad crossing upgrades, port and intermodal terminal access improvements, rail yard and rail track upgrades Roadways Capital projects primarily addressing motor vehicle travel mobility and/or access needs, but may include pedestrian, bicycle or transit infrastructure.These include new arterial and collector street connections,strategic widening,and highway overcrossings,as well as may include pedestrian, bicycle or other treatments. Bridges Capital project primarily addressing motor vehicle travel connectivity needs as well as may include pedestrian, bicycle or other treatments. Roadway Operations Roadway treatments that support operations,where capacity impacts are at most minor, including channelization,turn restrictions,speed reduction, reducing the number of lanes, repurposing space(without adding lanes)or make other improvements for reducing conflicts and increasing safety for all roadway users.These may also include accommodations to optimize freight truck operations,such as turning radii, height clearances,and signal time extensions. Bridge Operations Bridge treatments that support operations,where capacity impacts are at most minor, including channelization,turn restrictions, speed reduction, reducing the number of lanes, repurposing space(without adding lanes)or make other improvements for reducing conflicts and increasing safety for all roadway users.These may also include accommodations to optimize freight truck operations,such as turning radii, height clearances,and signal time extensions. Roadway Maintenance Funding for preservation and maintenance to keep bridges in a state of good repair, including and Preservation pavement resurfacing, preventive maintenance, preservation and rehabilitation. Bridge Maintenance and Funding for preservation and maintenance of the roadway to keep the system in a state of Preservation good repair, including pavement resurfacing and pavement or structure preventive maintenance, preservation and rehabilitation (e.g., new decking,joint repair, seismic retrofit). Throughways Capital projects primarily addressing motor vehicle travel mobility needs,including interchange fixes,strategic widening,or auxiliary lane additions,as well as pedestrian, bicycle or other treatments. Transit High Capacity Capital projects(that may be combined with service and operations improvements)that provide new light rail, bus rapid transit,streetcar,or commuter rail lines and/or facilities. Better Bus Moderate cost capital and operational treatments that improve transit capacity, reliability and travel time along major Frequent Service bus lines.These may include changes to the design and operation of streets and signals,typically owned and operated by the city,county or ODOT(e.g.,transit signal priority and signal improvements,dedicated bus or BAT lanes, queue jump lanes,traffic flow modifications,curb extensions at stops).They may also include changes to transit vehicle fleet,station equipment and operation systems typically owned and operated by TriMet or SMART(e.g., rolling stop modification,stop consolidation, headway management,all door boarding, larger vehicles).This also includes Metro's Better Bus program. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 30 Exhibit 1 Investment Category Description Capital-Other Other capital improvements to the transit systems, including: • Fleet investments including upgrades to low or no emission vehicles • Station and stop features such as shelters, benches, pads, passenger boarding areas, lighting,and real-time arrival information. • Features increasing multimodal access to transit such as completing sidewalk, bicycle facility, or trail connections and crossings to stops and stations and providing secure bicycle parking and co-located bike sharing facilities at and wayfinding signage to stops and stations. • Facilities for maintenance,operations, and vehicle storage. Operating Capital Other capital investments that support transit operations such as new technologies supporting payment options or information sharing transit or vehicle replacements for existing service or maintenance facilities. Service and Operations Funding for providing transit service and supporting light rail,commuter rail, bus rapid transit, streetcar, bus, shuttle,and tram operations. _ Maintenance Funding for preventive maintenance of fleet and facilities and transit vehicle replacement and infrastructure repair to keep the system in a state of good repair. Transit-oriented Policy and market incentives to encourage building higher-density, mixed-use projects in Development centers and along corridors served by high capacity and frequent transit. Other 1 Transportation System Funding supporting transportation system operations and efficiency, including ramp metering, Management active traffic management,traffic signal coordination,vehicle charging stations,and real-time (Technology) traveler information regarding traffic conditions, incidents,delays,travel times,alternate routes,weather conditions,construction,or special events. Transportation Demand Funding to support a set of strategies and programs designed to reduce demand for roadway Management travel, particularly single occupant vehicle trips,through various means(e.g.,education, outreach, marketing, incentives or disincentives,technology, policy).These include regional travel options programs, paid and timed parking in centers,encourage walking, biking, use of transit,van and carpooling,carsharing, ridesharing, and alternative work hours and telecommuting. It also includes Metro's Regional Travel Options(RTO) program. Capital and/or operational projects for pricing the use of roadways(which may be variable depending on the time of day), including gantries,toll technology, priced and/or managed Pricing Programs lanes(including high occupancy HOT lanes), and/or area-wide charges or cordon charges. Regional Activities Funding for work supporting metropolitan planning activities, planning and technical studies, grants for training and research programs,and other activities conducted pursuant to Titles 23 and 49 U.S.C. Step 3: Indicating Modeling Status and Adding or Changing Modeling Assumptions To add or change project or program modeling assumptions look column called "Modeling Forms" under the "Tasks" tab. Is this project new or have the modeling details been updated? New capital motor vehicle, freight, transit, and bicycle projects, OR projects included in the 2014 or 2018 RTP that have changed must provide modeling assumptions. To answer this 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 31 Exhibit 1 question, review the modeling details and files submitted for the 2018 RTP. Determine if any of the details have changed. I71 MODELING FORMS ® FILES F ADDITIONAL PROJECT ATT ra Show c DORY MODELING ASSUMPTIONS y project or program? [No] Q - ❑ Is this project new or have the modeling Q - % details been updated? ?nt Category [Throughways] Q Select the Yes or No from the drop-down list. If you are adding a new project, OR for projects included in the 2018 RTP that have changed, answer "yes". If not, select "no". If you answer yes to this question, review, update and or fill out a form of the project's modeling details under the "Modeling Forms" tab from the project menu bar. Add any supporting drawings or files under the "Files" tab, including the RTP ID# in the documents) title(s). *Does the project add a lane of any type? The purpose of this question is to identify projects that add motor vehicle capacity to the regional transportation system which must be included in the regional travel model. Select the Yes or No from the drop-down list. Consistent with 660-012-0830, answer "yes" to this question for any project exceeding $5 million in cost and including: (A) A new or extended arterial street, highway, freeway, or bridge carrying general purpose vehicle traffic; (B) New or expanded interchanges; (C) An increase in the number of general purpose travel lanes for any existing arterial or collector street, highway, or freeway; and (D) New or extended auxiliary lanes with a total length of one-half mile or more. If you answer yes to this question, fill out a form of the project's modeling details under the "Forms"tab. Roadway capacity modeling details Describe the modeling details: • Indicate the number of NB, WB, SB, EB through lanes, auxiliary lanes, turn lanes, posted speed and traffic signals before and after the project. • Describe the auxiliary lane extent and configuration that should be assumed in the traffic model. • Describe the interchange configuration to be assumed in travel model. • Describe the type of turn lane(s) (i.e., a right turn, double left turn, continuous left turn). • Describe the turn lane restrictions that should be assumed in the traffic model. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 32 Exhibit 1 • List the locations of all existing & anticipated traffic signals. TASKS IM PROGRESS SNAPSHOT © MODELING FORMS Bike Save infrastructure modeling details + NB Roadway capacity + WB modeling details + SB + EB Describe auxiliary lane extent and configuration that should be assumed in the traffic model 4 Also provide a link to any supporting modeling diagrams, engineering drawings, maps or other relevant information (see bike modeling worksheet example here). Maps and drawings should identify street names at project start and end locations and other important intersections. ! The RTP ID, project description, and project start and end location will populate automatically once you save. Check "yes"this form has been completed and click "save"at the bottom of the form. Upload files to support the information provided: • Click on the "Files" tab (second from the right) on the project menu bar. • Click "Upload File" in the top right corner to find the correct file to upload. • Select "Modeling Assumptions" from the checklist and add a short description of what you are uploading (e.g., engineering drawing). • Click "Add File" in the bottom right to submit. Does the project add bicycle infrastructure? Bicycle infrastructure additions that must be included in the regional bike model include: adding a cycletrack, buffered or protected bike lanes, on-street bike lanes, bike boulevard, and off-street trail/multi-use path. If the project adds any of these types of bicycle infrastructure, answer "yes" to this question. If you answer yes to this question, click on bike infrastructure modeling details or go to the "Modeling Forms" tab to fill out a form of the project's bicycle modeling details. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 33 Exhibit 1 Y TASKS IM PROGRESS SNAPSHOT © MODELING FORMS Bike Save infrastructure modeling details Describe the bike infrastructure Roadway modeling details capacity modeling details 4 Is the surface paved or unpaved?* Select... Type of bike facility Select... If you answered other above,please enter the type of Describe the bike infrastructure modeling details, whether the surface is paved or not, the type of bike facility, and provide a link to any supporting modeling diagrams, engineering drawings, maps or other relevant information. Maps and drawings should identify street names at project start and end locations and other important intersections. ! Don't worry about filling out the RTP ID, project description, or project start and end location -these are linked in the hub and will populate automatically once you save. Check "yes" this form has been completed and click "save" at the bottom of the form. Upload files to support the information provided: • Click on the "Files" tab (second from the right) on the project menu bar. • Click "Upload File" in the top right corner to find the correct file to upload. • Select "modeling assumptions" from the checklist and add a short description of what you are uploading (e.g., engineering drawing). • Click "Add File" in the bottom right to submit. ANote that many projects will both change roadway capacity and add bicycle infrastructure. For those projects, complete both modeling assumption sections. If only one of the two is applicable,you need only to submit modeling assumptions for the appropriate section. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 34 Exhibit 1 Step 4: Adding or Changing Project Status To add or change project or program status information look to the last column still in the "Tasks" tab. *What plan or study identified the need for this project? To be eligible for consideration for inclusion in the 2023 RTP, a project or program must come from adopted or approved plans, strategies or studies developed through a public planning process with public engagement and opportunities for public comment that identified the project to address a transportation need on the regional system. Indicate which type of adopted plan or strategy identified the need for the project or program. ANote that if a project is not in a Transportation System Plan,and is not in the RTP, and adds motor vehicle capacity you must fill out Congestion Management Process Documentation form. Fill out the form and upload it to the "Files"tab. Select the appropriate document from the list below or choose "This project has not been identified in a plan or study." • Transportation System Plan • Concept Plan • Freight Plan • Area Plan • Corridor Refinement Plan • Transit Plan • Service Enhancement Plan • Safe Routes to School Plan • Safety Plan • Active Transportation Plan • Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan • Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) Plan *Was the public involved in the process prioritizing this project? Transportation system plans, subarea plans, topical (e.g. safety) plans, modal (e.g. freight) plans, or transit service plans identify projects that prioritized for funding and timing based on community need. The public is engaged in a process to provide input shaping how the broader list is prioritized with specific outreach to communities of color, people with low-income and people who don't speak English well. Documentation of public involvement certifying that appropriate public involvement efforts were made or will be made and documented in the Public engagement and non-discrimination certification and documentation form. Select Yes or No from the drop-down list. If the project or program went through a process where the public was engaged in its prioritization, answer "yes" to this question. If not, answer "no". 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 35 Exhibit 1 Please upload the project or program geospatial file (zipped GIS file) All location-specific projects (those with a physical location) should submit a GIS geodatabase or shapefile. Having accurate geospatial information for transportation investments is vital to inform the visualization, mapping, analysis and communication of transportation investments in the RTP. STATUS O What plan or study identified the need for this project? [Freight Plan] ▪ Were the public engaged in the process prioritizing this project? [Yes] ❑ Please upload the projects geospatial file(zip) Q i c6 Q Have additional files?If yes,please upload in the files tab. ❑ Have you answered all questions?If yes,Is the project Information updated and ready to review? Digitized geographic information will support geospatial analyses that will measure how investments are supporting the vision and goals for the transportation system (e.g., overlapping with 2040 Growth areas, high injury corridors, Equity Focus Areas and other spatial data). GIS data will also be published in Metro public communication materials. • Base data Metro has from the adopted 2018 RTP is provided within the 2023 RTP Map Tool to help project sponsors review existing project extents. The base data reflects all projects in the 2018 RTP project list. Project sponsors are asked to review the existing digitized extent of each project. Metro can provide the data on request. • If the digitized extent of the project has changed, agencies should either provide edited GIS files as a geodatabase or an updated shapefile (if edits are needed) through the RTP Project Hub website for individual projects, or via Metro's ShareFile for 'bundled' shapefiles or geodatabase (Metro will provide a link to ShareFile). • Note that area-wide projects, including programmatic investments must identify the program/project boundary (e.g. city boundary for a sidewalk program, MPO boundary for a regional program) and provide that information. • You do not need to submit GIS files for projects in the 2018 RTP project list unless a revision is needed. o Answer "no" to the question "has the GIS information for this project changed" to indicate where geospatial information has not changed for the project since submission for the 2018 RTP. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 36 Exhibit 1 To upload geospatial files (zipped GIS file)for individual projects to the Hub GIS Data Submission Guidance: The geodata can be viewed in the RTP Map Tool and will be provided by Metro upon request. Nominating agencies must digitize the extent of their project by snapping to RLIS street lines (see below for examples) and saved as shapefiles or features in a geodatabase. • For existing projects, project sponsors can use the Map Tool to enable the 2018 project layer and zoom into the general areas of the project or use the Search to find the existing project. and verify the spatial extent. • For new projects, project sponsors will need to digitize the project extent. A. Linear Projects: Projects on roads, sidewalks, and other continuous paths associated with roadways should be created as a line feature that consists of RLIS street segments (e.g., traffic signal timing in a corridor or multiple corridors within a jurisdiction.) Please select the RLIS street lines for the project extent and export the feature titled with the RTP ID number and project name. B. Point projects: Projects that are in discreet locations (e.g., intersection improvements, bridge projects, etc.) should be created as a point feature in a geodatabase or a shapefile and snapped to the street network. Please export the point feature titled with the RTP ID number and project name. C. Area projects: Transportation projects that do not conform to lines or points can be represented with a polygon. These include region-wide projects, or projects that are programmatic in nature. In these instances, submit a polygon of the project or program extent in a geodatabase or as a shapefile. For instance, if your project is to implement a safe routes to school program in a city, you can submit the city boundary. Please export and upload the polygon feature titled with the RTP ID number and project name. If more than one project is contained within a shapefile, please provide the RTP ID number and project name for each project in the attribute table. Questions can be directed to Matthew Hampton at matthew.hampton@oregonmetro.gov • Click on the "Files" tab (second from the right) on the project menu bar. • Click "Upload file" in the top right corner to find the correct file to upload. • Select "Project Status" from the checklist and add a short description of what you are uploading. Use the naming protocol "RTP-ID#-ProjectName-Geoshapefile" • Click "Add File" in the bottom right to submit. To submit "Bundled"geospatial files (zipped GIS file)for multiple projects Upload bundled geospatial files to your agency file folder in ShareFile [link sent to agencies by Metro]. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 37 Exhibit 1 *Have additional files? If yes, please upload in the files tab • Click on the "Files" tab (second from the right) on the project menu bar. • Click "Upload file" in the top right corner to find the correct file to upload. • Select "Project Status" from the checklist and add a short description of what you are uploading. Use the naming protocol "RTP-ID#-DocumentName" • Click "Add File" in the bottom right to submit. Have you answered all questions? If yes, is the project information updated and ready to review? Answer this question when you have answered all required questions, made all necessary changes and added all necessary files and forms. To track progress toward task completion for a given project or program, click the "Progress Snapshot" tab on the right of the project menu bar. Each letter stands for sub-tasks under the Tasks tab, for example P= Project Details and tells you how much of that status has been completed. Select Yes—ready for Metro staff to review from the drop-down list when you are finished adding in all information. Additional project attributes Using project information submitted by nominating agencies and regional data sets, Metro will provide additional project information using GIS. After Feb. 17, Metro will add Yes/no/not evaluated answers to the questions listed below in the 'additional project attributes' tab for each project. • On RTP system? • In 2040 center? • In 2040 station community? • On 2040 corridor/main street? • In 2040 industrial area? • In 2040 regionally significant industrial area? • In 2040 employment center? • Get Moving 2020 project? • On RTP freight network? • Provides freight benefit? • On regional arterial? • On RTP planned motor vehicle network? • On RTP planned transit network? • In a transit access-shed? • On RTP planned pedestrian network? • On RTP planned bicycle network? • On planned regional trail system? • Fills one or more network gap? • On high injury corridor/intersection? • On congestion management process network? 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 38 Exhibit 1 • On regional emergency transportation route? • On Statewide seismic lifeline route? • Climate benefit? • Outside UGB? • In Title 13 habitat conservation area? • In Regional Conservation Strategy (top 25%) area? • Fish passage barrier? • In Conservation Opportunity area? • In FEMA floodplain and flood hazard area? • Crosses fish bearing stream? • Crosses wetland? • In White Oak habitat? • Crosses habitat connectivity corridor? • In RTP Equity Focus Area (2020)? • In RTP People of Color Focus Area? • In RTP People who speak limited English Focus Area? • In RTP People with Low Income Focus Area? 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 39 Exhibit 1 Staff and Data Resources Metro staff can also provide topical project and program-related technical support as needed during the process. 2023 RTP Update Process Kim Ellis kim.ellis@oregonmetro.gov Public engagement Molly Cooney-Mesker molly.cooney-mesker@oregonmetro.gov Title VI non-discrimination documentation Cliff Higgins clifford.higgins@oregonmetro.gov RTP finance and agency revenues Ted Leybold ted.leybold@oregonmetro.gov Safety projects Lake McTighe lake.mctighe@oregonmetro.gov Pedestrian, bicycle and trail projects and Regional John Mermin Active Transportation Plan john.mermin@oregonmetro.gov Regional Emergency Transportation Routes John Mermin john.mermin@oregonmetro.gov Freight projects and Regional Freight Strategy Tim Collins tim.collins@oregonmetro.gov Mobility corridors, road and bridge capacity or Tim Collins reconstruction projects tim.collins@oregonmetro.gov Demand management projects and programs Dan Kaempff daniel.kaempff@oregonmetro.gov System management and operations projects and Caleb Winter programs caleb.winter@oregonmetro.gov Transit projects, Regional Transit Strategy and High Ally Holmqvist Capacity Transit Strategy ally.holmqvist@oregonmetro.gov Ted Leybold Cost estimate methodology ted.leybold@oregonmetro.gov Travel demand model assumptions(including motor Thaya Patton vehicle,transit and bicycle) thaya.patton@oregonmetro.gov Geographic information system data and maps Matthew Hampton matthew.hampton@oregonmetro.gov RTP project list or on-line project hub Ally Holmqvist ally.holmgvist@oregonmetro.gov Who should I contact to coordinate updating the project list? Nominating agencies coordinate with other agencies and Metro staff liaisons to submit project list endorsements. Confirm coordinating committee meeting dates, times and locations with the appropriate agency contact below. 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 40 Exhibit 1 Agency Agency contact Metro Ally Holmqvist ally.holmqvist@oregonmetro.gov Lake McTighe lake.mctighe@oregonmetro.gov City of Portland Eric Hesse Eric.Hesse@portlandoregon.gov Francesca Jones francesca.Jones@portlandoregon.gov Clackamas County and cities Karen Buehrig karenb@co.clackamas.or.us Multnomah County and cities Allison Boyd (excluding City of Portland) allison.boyd@multco.us Washington County and cities Chris Deffebach christina.deffebach@co.washington.or.us TriMet Tara O'Brien obrienta@trimet.org ODOT Glen Bolen glen.a.bolen@odot.oregon.gov Port of Portland Lewis Lem lewis.lem@portofportland.com What data resources are available? Several resources are available on the 2023 RTP webpage at www.oregonmetro.gov/public- projects/2023-regional-transportation-plan/projects to support nominating agencies as they review and update project priorities in the RTP. Much of the data used in the project list assessment is found in the online RTP Map Tool. This map is a compilation of several regional datasets. The RTP Map Tool allows you view 2018 RTP project information in an interactive map display with other data layers. You can customize your map display to show just the information you want to see at different scales. You can search for projects by RTP ID, project name, or topic such as pedestrian using the search function. This tool will continue to be developed in support of the 2023 RTP update. Each data layer can be turned on and off. The RTP Map Tool shows the Metro planning area boundary, as well as all streets and rivers. Specific data layers included in the RTP map tool: • 2018 RTP Projects • 2040 Growth Concept Design Types • Equity Focus Areas • Regional High Injury Corridors and Intersections • Fatalities and serious injuries 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 41 Exhibit 1 Draft 2023 RTP Network Maps • Motor Vehicle • Bike • Pedestrian • Freight • Transit • Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) Draft RTP Network Gap Maps • Regional motor vehicle network gaps • Regional bike network gaps • Regional pedestrian network gaps • Regional trail network gaps • Regional transit network gaps Other datasets • Regional Emergency Transportation Routes (ETRs) • Oregon Seismic Lifeline Routes • Environmental Resource Layers (Title 13) • Floodplain and flood hazards (FEMA) • Jobs Access -Above regional average access to jobs within 30-minutes 2023 RTP Project Submission Guide 42 IN ■ TIGARD City of Tigard February 13, 2023 Kim Ellis, Principal Transportation Planner Oregon Metro Metro Regional Center 600 N.E. Grand Ave Portland, OR 97232 RE:2023 Regional Transportation Plan Local Agency Project List Submission Dear Ms. Ellis, Thank you for your work and Metro's leadership on the 2023 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) update. This important body of work aligns the region's shared priorities for a functional, equitable, and more climate-friendly transportation system. This letter serves as the Tigard City Council's endorsement of the list of RTP projects submitted by Tigard teammates during the 2023 RTP Call for Projects. Tigard's planned RTP projects are aligned with the City of Tigard's strategic plan vision to be"an equitable community that is walkable,healthy, and accessible for everyone." Best, Heidi Lueb,Mayor Yi-Kang Hu, Council President Jeanette Shaw, City Councilor City of Tigard Maureen Wolf, City Councilor Jai Raj Singh, City Councilor 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov 411 *, , s A-.- City of Tigard • " ,r. :`` .5 ' -�T F ° t ........-"vi . ,...N1 1 •blr'. ik• szi t ta; ‘.„ • - P,,'.-,1.7,-.1..911./r -i • 2023 Regional Transportation Plan Updatei; ' 4 !e-....,,'•'' i.b.'''.•1::..:._.. ::- • ; :, '1111 IL IN . "ir-- .." .41444iiroipik. V.• 1 _ -.• 4 ! 4,7 Tigard Draft 2023 ReIII •iottal Transportation Plan Pro 'ec 1 - -11 -:Y-4. � ' � .. g � p Projec "-M ■ 1 I City Council 111 February 7, 2023 �,NN,N: ifi Z NLnES i illi RISR% t a POLICE . ill 1::-, ,, 1 ,.• ... .:.. .. 1 } .+ TIGARD • r • •' I j - -t y 'f , ` y fit. I i. ' - " ,. y— The Regional Transportation Plan ( RTP) . , • Federally recognized metropolitan : Mtro transportation plan � -, ,1 • Guides coordinated regional r ' i s _ tal transportation investments � ` � ,-, 2018 Regional Transportation Plan • 2023 update underway now A blueprint for the future of transportation in the greater Portland region Adopted December 6,2018 oregonmetro.govl!tp Pr w - 2023 RTP Update Vision and Goals Eq uitable Tran spDrtrio1 in,aei ion---. Action and Everyone in the greater Portland region ab;IRl+� ResiliencePA. 02ipp ions will have safe, reliable' affordable, lifir R efficient, and climate-friendly travel 110 OAiii optoption5 that allow people to choose to drive less and support equitable, resilient, healthy and econoricalfy vibrant communities and region, see Thriving Sritein Economy • - ,114 � TIGARD - 2023 RTP Update Timeline What is the timeline fiarthe 2023 RTP update? SCOPING PLAN UPDATE AIIDPT'ION Nr Nr NF V 17 1 • Understand • Refine vision, • Update system * Up-date + Public review trends and values, goals, needs investment of draft plan challenges objectives, strategy targets& Update revenu- •2023 Plan • Review poricies forecast - considered for vision & / adoption priority I CALL FOR I DRAFT PLAN outcomes I PROJECTS RELEASED TO PUBLIC COMM UNIComm ENKA NON'S &ENG4 GEMENT Oct"1 -May'2 7m-Arg 71 'Sept-Dec 72 j -hm'2n Jul-Nov'23 The update must be completed by December 6,2029. %I 3 TIGARD - 2023 RTP Revenue Assumptions • Coordinated with Metro and Washington County • Sources include vehicle registration fees, gas tax (County and local ), Transportation Development Tax (TDT), Transportation System Development Fees (SDCs), Tigard tax increment financing programs, and anticipated state and federal grants. Table 1: Tigard Revenue Forecast (Year of Expenditure $) Financially Constrained List Strategic Priorities List Total Tigard RTP List Near (Highest Priority) Late (High Priority) Additional Priorities 2024-2030 2031-2045 2031-2045 2024-2045 $73,792,779 $191,182,279 $264,975,058 $529,950,116 - 2023 RTP Update Call for Projects • The 2023 RTP will include an updated list of transportation investment priorities for the greater Portland region • Cities, counties, and other transportation providers will work together through coordinating committees to prioritize projects • Each jurisdiction needs to submit its draft project list and project information during the 'call for projects' between Jan 6 and Feb 17, 2023 • Agencies must submit letter of endorsement from governing body no later than May 24, 2023 - 2023 RTP Update Call for Projects (cont. ) 411111MM JAN. TO FEB. '23 FEB. MARCH TO JUNE ' A JULY TO AUG. '23 2023 RIP Public Review Draft Cali for Projects High-level 2023 RTP and ill ubmission Period Assessmen Project and I. of Projects __-1.t.... WI.5 *._17 1 0 Program IISystem Analysis Priorities Caord�noting cnmmirtets, I rims,counties anti agexicies July 10 to Aug. identrfy priorities 1 1 I I P I Engagement activities ]PACT and Metro Councit direction !PACT and Metro Council direction on policy framework for the on release of draft plan and project Call for Projects lists for public review IIaq TIGARD - 2023 RTP Update Call for Projects (cont. ) • Action Requested of Council and Recommendation • Make a motion authorizing teammates to take all actions necessary to complete step 1 and step 2 as described below: Step 1: By February 17th, 2023, submit a letter from Council to Oregon Metro endorsing Tigard's 2023 RTP Draft Project List. Step 2: Make any needed refinements to Tigard's 2023 RTP Draft Project List in response to the 2023 RTP project assessment and engagement period that will occur between February and May of 2023. - 2023 RTP Update Call for Projects (cont.) • The RTP contains regionally significant projects in three categories: • Near-Term Constrained (2024 - 2030) • Late-Term Constrained (2031 — 2045) • Unconstrained or 'Strategic' (2031-2045) • Revenue assumptions for these three lists are the 'guardrails' for overall project capacity • Since 2018, capital project costs have increased significantly - 2023 RTP J Update Call for Projects (cont. ) • Project eligibility requirements for inclusion in ' � it � , ~ ' l :i" the RTP : Tigard On the Move Transportation • Must be on the regional network; , system Plan , W,�.eq • Must be within the metropolitan planning area (MPA) ' • boundary; a • , �, 4 • Must be in an adopted plan developed through a public 4 i„ 1. 4r process; i • Must be at least $2 million in size; „ ‘*)11 • Projects that increase capacity must be identified for 444 modelling; and FEHR PEERS • Projects with committed funding but not yet complete —. must be included. 111 TIGARD - 2023 RTP Update Call for Projects (cont.) • Creation and refinement of Tigard's draft 2023 RTP project list • Removed completed projects; • Revised project cost estimates with guidance from Metro and Washington County; • Added and/or modified projects for consistency with Tigard's 2040 TSP, Tigard's adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP); and • Put some projects on hold . - 2023 RTP J Update Call for Projects (cont. ) • Draft 2023 Tigard Project List Cost Estimates Estimated YOE $ Cost Estimated Cost (2023 Dollars) (mid-point of timeframe) NEAR TERM PROJECT!!! REVENUE 2024-2030 FORECAST $ 73,792,779 TOTALS $ 66,500,000 $ 75,677,000 LATE TERM PROJECTS.' REVENUE 2031-2045 FORECAST $ 191,182,279 TOTALS $ 123,720,000 $ 201,292,440 STRATEGIC PROJECTS REVENUE 2031-2045 FORECAST $ 264,975,058 TOTALS $ 264,514,000 $ 430,364,278 a TIGARD - 2023 RTP Update Call for Projects (cont. ) REVENUE$ TOTALS $ $ FORECAST 73,792,779 66,500,000 75,677,000 • Near Term Primary End Estimated Estimated YOE$ st Facility RTP ID Project Name Start Location Location Description Cost(2023 (mid-point of (2024 _ ^/ 1 Owner Dollars) timeframe) `o 3 o/ Widen roadway to a 3-lane complete street(with sidewalks, Tigard McDonald Street $ $ Hwy 99W Hall Blvd bike lanes,and center turn lanes where appropriate)and Urban Upgrades 24,700,000 28,108,600.000 crossing enhancements at some locations. • 7 projects 72nd Ave. Build 3-lane complete street with separated cycletracks, $ $ igard 10755 Improvements- 99W Dartmouth sidewalks,and improved pedestrian crossings.Includes new 15,000,000 17,070,000.000 99W to Dartmouth bridge over Red Rock Creek. • 3 n e w igard 10766 Fanno Creek Woodard Park Milton Court Construct 3 new segments of the Fanno Creek Trail and make $ $ Connections Project improvements to existing segment from Ash Ave to Hall Blvd. 10,400,000 11,835,200.000 North Dakota St North Dakota igard - (Fanno Creek) Street at Fanno Replace bridge,with bike lanes and sidewalk. $ $ Bridge Replacement Creek 7,000,000 7,966,000.000 igard St(Fanno Tigard St at Fanno Tigard ••.Creek)Bridge Creek Replace bridge with bike lanes and sidewalk. $ 6,000,000 6,828,0$ 0.000 Replacement empleton-Twality Safe Routes to Improve pedestrian crossings,complete missing sidewalk $ $ Tigard - School McDonald St Sattler St segments,pave trail through East Butte Park. 2,000,000 2,276,000.000 Improvements Downtown Tigard pedestrian Downtown Improve sidewalks,lighting,crossings,bus shelters and benches $ $ improvements throughout tTigard Downtown. 1,400,000 1,593,200.000 (urban renewal) 1111 w . TIGARD - 2023 RTPp U date Call for Projects (cont. ) LATE TERM PROJECTS ' REVENUE$ $ $ 2031-2045 TOTAIS FORECAST191,182,279 123,720,000 201,292,000 Estimated Estimated VOE$ Primary Facility End Cart • Late Term RTP IO Project Name Start Lo anon Description Cart(2023 paint) Owner Laxation Dollars) m tl- f _ meframe Hall Blvd. Build protected bike facilities,complete sidewalks on both sides OOOT 112201mprovements- Locust Durham of the road,build improved pedestrian crossings.Combine and $ $ Locust Durham coordinate with ODOT State of Good Repair project and 20,000,000 32,540,000.000 (2031 2045) Ptential Washington County project north of SW Locust. Greenburg Rd Add bicycle and pedestrian facilities to Tietleman Road and Tigard 11998 Tietleman Ave Walnut 5t roundabout or signal at Tigard St,and improvements to $ $ Complete Street Greenburg Intersection.Includes bicycle and pedestrian 20,000000 32,540900.000 facilities connecting to Fanno Creek Trail. Construct a new Highway 217 overcrossing for active Highway 2l]Pe- transportation users connecting Metzger Neighborhood and $ $ • 11 projects Bard w Bike Crossing at SW Oak Street 95th Ave Shady Lane WSRCarea rthe Greenburg Neighborhood,Tigard Heritage 15,000000 24405,000.000 Trail,Fannnno Creek Trail,and Downtown Tigard. Ha11/Hunziker/Scoff Intersection ODOT 11223 ns Intersection Hall Blvd. with Realign offset intersection to cross intersection to alleviate $ $ Realignment Hunziker& congestion and safety issues. 11,000,000 17,897,000.000 $corgna • 2 n e w Tigard Triangle Upgrade and Improve roads,Improve sidewalks,lighting Tigard 10]60 multimodal Tigard Trianglecrossings,Implement curbside management strategies,bus $ $ Improvements shelters and benches throughout the Tigard Triangle. 11,000,000 1],69],000000 (urban renewal) • Build complete street with sidewalks and bike lanes on both Tigard 11229 Walnut Street Tledeman Ave Hwy 99W sides and ped crossing improvements;may include turn lane $ $ Improvements app oaching Hwy 99W. 10,360,000 16,855,]20.000 Atlanta Street $ $ Tigard 11408 Extension to 74th 74th Ave 69th Ave Extend Atlanta Street west to 74th Ave. 10,160,000 16,530,320.000 Ave canna Creek Trail $ $ Tigard 12088 Gap(Bonita to Cook Bonita Road Cook Park Complete regional trail gap. 1800,000 15,900,600.000 Park( ODOT 12003 Hall Blvd/Fanno Over Fanno Creek Replace bridge and add dedicated pedestrian and bicycle S $ Creek Bridge in Tigard facilties. 8,400,000 13,666,800.000 Tigard Build a railroadundercrossing far pedestrians and bicycles west Tigard newPetl/Bikeosti SW 95th Ave Heritage of Pacific Highway(01399W),connecting Grant Ave with 95th $ $ Untlercrossing Trail Ave. 5,001000 8,135,000.000 Hunziker S[ Add sidewalk on north side of Hunziker from current sidewalk $ $ Tigard 12003 Sidewalk and Bike 9311131w1 72nd Ave end(near 7585 Hunziker)to 72nd Ave and complete bike lanes.3,000,000 4,881,000.000 Lanes I' " 2 TIGARD - 2023 RTP Update Call for Projects (cont.) ". • Strategic (2031 — 2045) • 28 projects N . 44 TIGARD - 2023 RTP Update Call for Projects Next Steps • Tigard teammates are entering Tigard's 2023 RTP draft projects into Metro's 'Project Hub' web portal (deadline for entry is February 17th) • At its February 13th meeting, the Washington County Coordinating Committee (WCCC) will consider and recommend Washington County (county and cities) 2023 RTP draft project list to Metro • Starting in late February, Metro will lead an assessment of draft RTP projects and engage with the policy makers and the public to gather feedback on the draft project list _ — Thank you Discussion and Questions AIS-5097 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/07/2023 Length (in minutes):45 Minutes Agenda Title: Climate Adaptation and Natural Hazard Mitigation Authored By: Jesse Raymundo Presented By: Emily Tritsch and Mike Lueck Item Type: Receive and File Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: 01/11/2023 Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE This is an opportunity to build awareness of future climate hazards and potential impacts to the community. The mitigation information helps emergency services and the community better prepare for climate adaptations necessary and systems vulnerabilities that may occur from hazard impacts. Defining the principles of climate adaptation planning for emergency management and existing first response processes will enable us to discuss the impact of weather on critical infrastructure and key resources while explaining the concurrent effects of climate change on those impacts. Council will also gain more understanding of how we can collectively identify and apply adaptation strategies to address local emergency services sector vulnerabilities.We would also like to make Council aware of the various resources that can be used to implement local climate adaptation strategies in our community. The overall goal is to prepare the community and the emergency services sector for the climate adaptations and systems vulnerabilities that might occur from hazard impacts and to enhance awareness to future climate hazards and impacts that the emergency services sector and our community members may face. ACTION REQUESTED No action requested. This will be an educational briefing for the Council. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations History During the city's revision of the 20-year Comprehensive Plan 07-08 a technical team made up of representatives from Community Development,Public Works,Risk and Police Department independently drafted the original version. We aligned the identified hazards with the Comp Plan Goal 7, submitted the draft plan, and received approval from FEMA. Council formally adopted the Initial Plan in 2008. In 2013, we independently revised version II. In 2018,we were awarded a federal grant and partnered with Hillsboro and Washington County to complete Version III with support from a contractor. Our 2023 Version IV is also being facilitated by different contractor and Washington County project administrator;but this time 10 collaborative partners worked on our plans concurrently sharing information and strategies throughout the last 12 months. Those partners are listed below: City of Hillsboro City of Tigard City of Beaverton City of Forest Grove City of Cornelius City of Sherwood City of North Plains Clean Water Services Tualatin Valley Water District Tualatin Hills Parks and Recreation District Purpose States and local jurisdictions and agencies are required to have a FEMA-approved natural hazard mitigation plan to be eligible for grant funding. The Plan must be updated every five years and must meet state and federal planning requirements. This Version IV will take just over a year to complete, and the outline is as follows: Phases Phase 1: Organize Resources, Facilitate Planning Process (February 1- February 27) Kick off workshop with Steering Committee Phase 2: Risk Assessment (March 1- May 30) Two workshops with Steering and Technical Committees Public outreach Phase 3: Mitigation Strategy (June 1-July 30) Two workshops with Steering and Technical Committees Stakeholder workshop—Mitigation Action Items Phase 4: Plan Implementation and Maintenance Process (August 1-August 30) Workshop with Steering and Technical Committees,if needed Phase 5: Plan Approval and Adoption (September 1- October 30; November 1-December 30) Draft plan review workshop with Steering and Technical Committees Public review and input Plan Outline Volume 1: Executive summary, acronyms, and sections 1-4 Volume 2: Participant annexes Volume 3:Appendices Volume 1 Executive summary Acronyms Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Hazard identification and risk assessment Section 3: Mitigation strategy Section 4: Plan execution, maintenance, and adoption Volume 2 Introduction Participant annex contents: Cover page Table of contents Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Planning process Chapter 3: Hazard identification and risk assessment Chapter 4: Capabilities assessment Chapter 5: Mitigation strategy Volume 3 Appendix A: Planning process and public engagement Appendix B: Implementation resources and funding opportunities Why To provide awareness of risks and vulnerabilities: Dam failure—Scoggins threatens to fail Drought—experiencing annually Extreme Heat—record-breaking temperatures in last several years Earthquake—potential for catastrophic event Flood—localized flooding each year Landslide—one of the last incidents was several years ago near Bull Mountain Road and 99W Volcanic Ash - 2008 Wildland fire and smoke—last year wildfire outside the jurisdiction to staff and smoke impacted Tigard and the region. Tornado / Gustnado (windstorm) -last month and in May 2022 Winter storm (snow and ice) —during last year's holidays Public Involvement Next Steps Complete Phases 3-5 Very early in 2023, the steering committee chair and the technical team will promote the public review of the draft plan for 30 days, shortly after that we would like to come back and seek formal adoption of 2023-2028 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (NHMP) ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION ADDITIONAL RESOURCES r Attachments No file(s) attached. ,, , ... . . :. SUPPLEMENTALPACKET FOR P . KET FOR FEBRUARY 7, 2023 .• COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM 6 ... - • ,... City of' • 5., - ,• . .__- ,..... 1111 ' _. . ... , ., _ „. ..,,, ..:. , • :_. ... . ,._.. te. ., .... „, . ,. .. k _....,,, t .... a- .... .. •i - .t.i...-t'%,-k le.Na, lips_.. .-.,-.li...•A.. ;Ail — -.- ,-..r.71:1;'••,,,, _,1 •ft.4".F'. .kv... fi..' r5., r., • . 4,-1.4.v. 1F T • Aril 4. 'gar ... ....,_. ......„..... „.... „:. al... .,,,,„„,„....::. „.,,,,,,,..., . . . , ........,:,.,.....„.‘" ..L.0._ . ..,,.. .. ...,,,, ..,.. - lli.;',..1 411 111<li,,, ,, • - ...iit• ";.14 14 likel: lr;*4k - • il.. _ — .•Z.4tert,44:41\ lip — iNgt‘t . ..,. . . . I citlit ' _ • folli:,-_, • , ... •••#....," 9i Iit , ........, „ . ,....... . .....„ Emergency Management , : --. .:., --: . .,,..•:,.. • ' '....A..# i -/-,'''...7.pc • C I imate Adaption ... ., ,,_ 41,PrA.,* , N.-•.; .,. ..50,• .. ...110 ... '• 1.••'- , . ' . 1111/1160w. ' • -.,.: '• "/ 7'r.:-• .. .A.,-.,. ...‘,.. Mitigation _...........4_,... •4•INIC. Iii. 410 II Ai . II Mike Lueck, Emergency Services Coordinator ,.. . 41 4-_- •. . .,,... •. _ . ii Ak— , MAN Wallas 114 February 7, 2023 TIGAR • . lc moucaithr .• . • • . • . ...... ••, . .. _ .. •. • 1 ppo—E.....____, s'Itt ii.. -,• AI84"" ' ' ,_low vp--•• 1 • . , . • ,,... I. - "-: 6. . -...., • .. ,.. .,... _ .....„. , .• , .. .. . fa NJ ,....„. .. . ,.. :„.• ,- -..._..„..., . , . • . , , .:;,----..11‘-- „:,. . ,-.. .,: ,.:, ... ... :-- ----' ..... . 2 _....,..... . 1,-, „ I • . '', -"N . r_i_ : ...„..........„ _ .• . ._ .. . , ..., - .,--›...-:• 1 , , •,/ . I -4 -I - ' • •' S • .'. . : i• •:: .- .-4r,I,,' . • 'F. . ANN , , ,. Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (NHMP Update and Climate Adaption Strategies or Flexible Pathways Considerations Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. NI Identified Hazards . • ., . .. . . I f ' �r fiV .'r TIGARD ,,; }. . ; ��.� * = Climate Related Hazards - A 7 . notent• :mow _ ,.' li t ' Dam failure Drought * Extreme Heat I . Earthquake Flood * .� � Landslide Flooding in Tigard 2015 - Volcanic ash Wildland fire and smoke Tigard:An equitable community that is Tornado / G u st n a d o (windstorm) * walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. Winter storm (snow and ice) * Why the urban heat island effect occurs , F.I.e y+• TIGARD EH - Reduce Urbanen +4 wT. i 1 1 Heat Island Effect '- -� ; � • 44 . • ..�,+• ti__ - ��FPO Type of Action 1 _24. Plans and Regulations-Natural System Protection `�' Strategy/Flexible Pathway: Low Adopting Code and Regulations that incentivize the installation of green roofs, solar panels, and solar parking covers, which shade and remove heat from roofs, paving surfaces and surrounding air. Incentivizing and encouraging cool roofing products, such as white roofs that reflect sunlight and divert heat away from a building. Increasing tree planting around buildings to shade parking areas and lots along public rights-of-way Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. _:„.. i, Er _....6 .„ FL - Improve Flood Risk T. . Fred TIGARD -- *�"�.v. .. � - 1 � �'% �„ . Meyer - , Assessment - - ..,....__ 4, _: � im ...4 Type of Action -- - 1 - • ---..- 41116* — t - - � . Plans and Regulations -_-- _ ~ - =.- _. - - Strategy/Flexible Pathway: Medium Heighten awareness of flood risk. Incorporating the procedures for tracking high water marks following a flood into emergency response plans. Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. tr TIGARD S/VS VVinter Weather -- a = _ Risk Awareness Activities —; • Type of Action Public Education and Awareness - = Strategy/Flexible Pathway: High h JY y J Produce and distribute family and traveler emergency preparedness information about severe winter weather hazards and potential impacts. Consider including safety strategies for severe weather in driver education classes and materials Educate citizens that all fuel -burning equipment should Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. be vented to the outside. Encourage homeowners to install carbon monoxide monitors and alarms 1,.. ,... ,_ Cityof T1 ardiii m 1111 ilitimmi,.. aQUESTIONS? __,.. . III II Ai li iii,ii 1 IP0LCL i .7 101 Ii Mike._Lueck, Emer• ency Services Coo rd � nator 4. 1"7-m-.- t iii 1 ., .:rt Mi v ti • ara -or. L. 4 (503) 718-2593- PrTa 411° f I -t-_: T .