The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 12/13/2022 114 • City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE DECEMBER 13,2022-6:30 p.m.Business Meeting Revised 12/12/2022-Agenda Item AND TIME: No. 10-Executive Session Added;Revised 12/13/2022-Agenda Reordered MEETING Hybrid- City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 - See LOCATION: PUBLIC NOTICE below PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with the City of Tigard's Safety Plan related to COVID-19 and Oregon House Bill 4212,this will be a hybrid meeting where some Council, staff or public will participate in person and some will participate remotely. How to comment: •Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments before noon the day of the meeting. •If attending the meeting in person,please fill out the public comment sign-in sheet at the front of the room and come to the microphone when your name is called. •If you prefer to call in,please call 503-966-4101 when instructed to be placed in the queue.We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to three minutes. •You may comment through video through the Teams app. Go to this link to learn how to participate by video: December 13,2022 Council Meeting (https://www.tigard-or.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/2324/66). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM ONLINE:https://www.tigard-or.gov/boxcast CABLE VIEWERS:The City Council meeting will be shown live on Channel 28 at 6:30 p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Saturday 7:30 p.m. Sunday 11:30 a.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. " City of Tigard • • Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE DECEMBER 13,2022- 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting Revised 12/12/2022-Agenda Item AND TIME: No. 10-Executive Session Added;Revised 12/13/2022-Agenda Reordered MEETING Hybrid-City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 6:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITION 3. PUBLIC COMMENT 6:35 p.m. estimated time A. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment B. Tigard High School Student Envoy C. Update from Police Chief McAlpine D. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce E. Public Comment—Written F. Public Comment— In Person G. Public Comment—Phone-In H. Public Comment—Video 4. CONSENT AGENDA 6:50 p.m. estimated time (Tigard City Council)The Consent Agenda is used for routine items including approval of meeting minutes,contracts or intergovernmental agreements.Information on each item is available on the city's website in the packet for this meeting.These items may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Council members may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. A. RECEIVE AND FILE NOVEMBER 8,2022 ELECTION CANVASS OF VOTES • Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 5. 2023 STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE AGENDAS 6:55 p.m. estimated time 6. LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING: CLIMATE FRIENDLY AND EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES REQUIRED PARKING REFORM 7:40 p.m. estimated time 7. PRESENTATION OF EXTERNAL FINANCIAL AUDIT BY MOSS ADAMS 8:10 p.m. estimated time 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 8:50 p.m. estimated time 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION:The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss performance-related review of public officers or employees,under ORS 192.660(2) (i).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision.Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 8:55 p.m. estimated time 11. ADJOURNMENT 9:05 p.m. estimated time 11,1 -� . • TIGARD Public Comments received by noon for the December 13, 2022 Meeting of the Tigard City Council 1. Ken Barker 12/11/2022 Climate change concerns and request to update building codes to include more energy efficiency requirements Carol Krager From: Ken Barker Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 10:55 PM To: Carol Krager;Jason Snider Cc: Subject: Tigard building codes-Tigard Council Dec. 13 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Please email me confirmation that you received this email-Thanks Greetings: I am a resident of the City of Tigard and am very concerned about the climate changes we are experiencing. I am hoping you can consider these thoughts during your Dec. 13 Council meeting. Many of these climate changes are due to our inefficient buildings that are contributing to the carbon in our atmosphere causing some of this climate changes. I am hopeful that you will do everything possible to ensure Tigard's building codes require the most updated building codes that require Tigard's buildings to be the most energy efficient possible It is much cheaper to ensure Tigard's buildings are the most energy efficient during initial construction and upgrades. It can be very expensive to do energy efficient upgrades when no upgrades are planned. Thanks for your consideration. Ken Barker City of Tigard Resident Advocate for Getting into Climate Actions Email: 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 F - PUBLIC COMMENT DATE: December 13, 2022 (Limited to 3 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and cities of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME & CITY YOU LIVE IN TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email I ' PO ? - _ _ 1 . _:., - -: ''.rtr.:4...____ vkf*.i.-;:liow,:-7!;•-•,,,--`1---, _ - , ez 414 trial slo II. i ' : . i_ : ..... „...--, - . 1411 0 si,,,A , 441LP pi- .. sibl 1.147 I V +� w + 41.,..... ..41011 J. ,411k- IP _ ..,..A,.'14 .ra. -: . k.,, n i [[ /� Nig y 1. f :: ,:ti, �y I fit + - - . 4 h Oji l � 64,- 9, , Vt-;,-.' r .6:1 . _ -, _. .. i., . 'IL. T - .Jr 111" 0 arA alt:*' 4 ..", a i ``-.9. ,-, A . TIGARD POLICE Engagement — Crime — Houselessness - Initiatives — Lifesaving 2022 IN REVIEW BARD E DEPARTMEN 0 it 1111111e4 lap t •,, G� _ s� 11, rune 1TEGRITY- 4111& tEAMWO V ' ' '!::::::\t:',F\ i It Pr 4111or. 4 —4e ;-...:-1 • r 1%10 2 • ,;14101 ,,,,,,... r ,A,'''rr'''-i 4'' ..kiiie:••A' ' '. ....4 i f''.°It' ',.,,Z.,%'l;.r;'P..)*.1•1,,,4,I,,16 4.so'roei.,'!. f ,...' 4 , 4.• ... ....,C ,. ,. PIAT _ .1- . _ SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET FOR DECEMBER 13, 2022 COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM 3C w* DEA*,� Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard r �q vont.E NFor November 2022 TIG 1Rt `{,P OF o�� 2021 Population Estimate 55,854 (Adopted Budget FY 2022-23) �CE*TEAS Small numbers cause large percentage increases and decreases. Crime Snapshot Selected Group A Offenses Nov-21 Nov-22 %Chg 2021 YTD 2022 YTD %Chg Person Crime 36 33• -8.33% 408 546• 33.82% Assault 28 25• -10.71% 327 436• 33.33% Robbery 4 4• 0.00% 31 63• 103.23% Property Crime I 202 _ 213 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1963 2578• 31.33% Burglary-Residential 7 3• -57.14% 46 60• 30.43% Burglary-Business 5 6• 20.00% 57 61 • 7.02% Burglary-Other 3 4 n/a 52 99• 90.38% UUMV 14 15• 7.14% 134 260 0 94.03% Theft 118 124• 5.08% 1053 1411 • 34.00% Vandalism 26 26• 0.00% 312 356• 14.10% Societal Crimes I 59 54• -8.47% 538 611• 13.57% DUII 9 15• 66.67% 114 129• 13.16% Drug Offense 4 4• 0.00% 22 23• 4.55% Disorderly Conduct 5 6• 20.00% 41 69• 68.29% Arrests (*CTA in Total) ' 99 Ilim 112• 13.13% 1024 1273• 24.32% Felony 15 13• -13.33% 101 183• 81.19% MISD 8 30• 275.00% 129 327• 153.49% Warrants 36 43 0 19.44% 405 457• 12.84% Calls for Service Nov-21 Nov-22 %Chg 2021 YTD 2022 YTD %Chg Dispatched Calls 1831 1625• -11.25% 19863 20956• 5.50% Self Initiated Calls 1077 1107• 2.79% 12575 12089• -3.86% Online Crime Reports 58 61 5.17% 505 745 47.52% Response Time Nov-21 Nov-22 %Chg 2021 YTD 2022 YTD %Chg Priority 1 &2 6.65 6.18 0 -7.07% 6.32 6.35• 0.47% Priority 3 10.67 9.92• -7.03% 9.77 10.22• 4.61% Priority 4+ 11.35 9.82$ -13.48% 9.68 9.73• 0.52% Photo Enforcement 1 Red Light- Began Issuing 03/11/20 Month of: Nov 2022 YTD 2021 2022 Yr to Yr Received Issued Rejected Issued Issued %Chg 99W/SW Hall Blvd 228 221 2980 3261 9% 99W/SW 72nd Ave 139 131 8 1111 963 -13% 99W/SW Durham Rd 8 8 0 301 288 -4% Intersection Speed - Began Issuing 7/14/20 Month of: Nov 2022 YTD 2021 2022 Yr to Yr Received Issued Rejected Issued Issued %Chg 99W/SW Hall Blvd 200 196 4 1797 2436 36% 99W/SW 72nd Ave 905 899 6 12879 7768 -40% *Person Crime-Assault(verbal harassment,menacing,simple and felony assault),Homicide,Robbery,Kidnap,Forcible/Non-Forcible Sex Offense *Property Crimes-Arson,Bribery,Res Burglary,Bus Burglary,Oth Burglary,Forgery,Vandalism,Embezzle,Fraud,Theft,UUMV,Bad Check *Societal Crimes-Drug Offense,Prostitution,Weapons,Curfew,DisCon,DUII,Family Offense,Liqour Laws,Peeping Tom,Trespass *The data is National Incident Based Reporting System(NIBRS)compliant and not Uniform Crime Report(UCR)compliant and cannot be compared to any report using that standard.For more info on NIBRS:https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/ucr/nibrs 1 y�Pp�xSk,AI Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard 0 I`Y For November 2022 I 4�� TIGARD OOR 4� 2021 Population Estimate 55,854 (Adopted Budget FY 2022-23) CE*TBA ' Employee Snapshot Department Staffing Information Actual Budget % Budget Sworn 69.0 75.0 92% Non-Sworn 15.0 18.0 83% Total Number of Personnel 84.0 93.0 90% Patrol Staffing Authorized 43 I Days Swings Graves Overall% #of Shifts at or below Minimums 11 37% 13 43% 10 33% 38% Personnel Unavailable for Work Patrol ' All Other Overall #of Recruits in Pre-Academy 1 1 #of Recruits in Academy 1 1 #of Recruits in Recruit Training 3 1 4 #of Personnel on Extended Sick Leave / FMLA - #of Personnel on Military Leave 1 1 #of Personnel on Modified Duty* 2 2 #of Personnel on Administrative Leave - - - Total Personnel Unavailable to Work during some Period during the Month 8 1 9 Total Officers Available to work PATROL some period during the Month 35 *Modified Duty=any modified work schedule to accommodate light duty,workers comp,Covid related EOC-S or EOC-F or L WOP Operational Effectiveness Snapshot Budget Information is based on the best available data. FY 2021-22 Budget FY 2022-23 Budget Percent YTD Status Percent YTD Status Department Budget Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Administrative 40% 42%0 -2% 41% 42% 0 -1% Operations 33% 42%0 -8% 39% 42% 0 -3% Services 42% 42%0 1% 39% 42% 0 -2% Total Department Budget 37% 42%0 -5% 39% 42% • -2% Budget Information is based on the best available data. FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Percent YTD Budget Percent YTD Budget Status Status Department Overtime Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Administrative 15% 42%0 -27% 27% 42% 0 -14% Operations 21% 42%0 -20% 25% 42% 0 -17% Services 22% 42%0 -20% 39% 42%0 -2% Total Overtime 21% 42%0 -20% 29% 42% 0 -13% 2 �qw ti E' ��*f��. Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard For November 2022 dl V. H N� 2021 Population Estimate 55,854 (Adopted Budget FY 2022-23) �P�cE*TEN6�o Levy Status Update Levy To Date(LTD)is July 1,2020 to date Nov-22 Nov-22 LTD LTD Training Officers Hours Officers* Hours Advanced Crisis Intervention and De-escalation Training 0 0 3 60 Crisis Intervention 0 0 89 230.5 De-escalation Training 0 0 96 191.5 "LTD(Levy To Date)Officer totals may duplicate officer count as training happens muliple times ayear Totals 0 0 188 482 Levy Staffing Information-LEVY to date progress Actual Budget %Budget Sworn-Patrol 7.0 8.0 88% Sworn-SRO 1.0 1.0 100% Non-Sworn 0.0 2.0 0% Total Number of Personnel 8.0 11.0 73% Levy Hiring Process Patrol All Other Overall Patrol All Other Overall Nov-22 Nov-22 Nov-22 Levy to Date Levy to Date Levy to Date Interviews 3 0 3.00 149 44 193.00 ORPAT(physical fitness test) 0 0 - 30 0 30.00 Background investigations completed 2 1 3.00 70 4 74.00 Conditional Offers of employment 0 0 - 22 1 23.00 Hires 0 1 1.00 15 1 16.00 Emergency Response Times - 6 Year Trend PRIORITY 1 AND 2 Priority 1 calls= 6.98 6.65- Imminent threat to life -6.25 X5.97/ 6.18 5.77 Priority 2 calls=Immediate threat to life,occuring now 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 20 District integrity (5 police districts) #of Shifts conducted with 5 or more patrol Days Swings Graves Overall officers 4 13% 17 57% 9 30% 33% Community Snapshot Community Outreach and Events News Releases(2) Upcoming Events *Westside Crime Prevention Coalition(11/3) *13 Arrested in Shoplifting Blitz *Westside Crime Prevention Coaltion(12/1) *Summerfield Civic Assoc.HOA Mtg(11/10) *Wanted Man Safely Detained After 3 Hour *Christmas for Kids @ Fred Meyer(12/7) *Tigard Breakfast Rotary presentation(11/15) Standoff *Tigard Turns the Tide Year End Mtg(12/15) *Community Academy graduation(11/16) Other *November Video Newsletter released *Multiple media inquires 3 tzp ��ApERS--- Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard t �qw roLicE-i,, For November 2022 F e I[:ARO 2021 Population Estimate 55,854 (Adopted Budget FY 2022-23) 4q OR �cE*TEAS Calls For Service - By Month: 7 Year Trend NOV DISPATCHED NOV SELF INITIATED 1831 1821 1771 \ _1710 1320 1446 1327 1669 / \ 1643 1625 00001077—11107 1553 N 718 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 • 11 - Tracking Code Cases - Year to Date ilk ilil - 019 2020 2021 2022 Overdose 23 21 20 22 24 DHS referrals an. cases of allegations Mental Health hold (POH) 163 118 117 92 93 of abuse to an Suicide 7 10 4 8 6 elderly or mentally Attempted Suicide 55 47 36 34 40 challenged victim DHS Referral 513 497 406 458 419 end up in the Domestic Violence (DV) 145 114 133 143 154 caseload of Detectives and DV No Crime 115 122 98 92 96 SRO's. Organized Retail Crime (ORC) Theft 51 67 55 40 123 Graffiti 100 45 103 55 44 BHI - Transient - ■ Total Dispatched Calls: 1625 Total Societal Calls: 992 %of monthly workload 61% # of Calls-BHI** 243 _ # of Calls Transient 129 # of Calls Dispatched 282 # of Calls Self Initiated 36 131:05:06 (hr:min:sec) Total BHI/Transient calls 318 *Note 1:Behavioral Health Incidents(BHI)and Transient calls are a subset of the category"Societal"calls. The statistics above are based on officer inputs. **Note 2:An incident may be both BHI and Transient related. These figures are not additive. 4 AIS-5105 4.A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2022 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Receive and File November 8, 2022 Election Canvass of Votes Authored By: Carol Krager Presented By: City Recorder Carol Krager Item Type: Motion Requested Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Receive and File the official election results for the November 8, 2022 election for one mayor position and three city council positions. ACTION REQUESTED Approve by motion the City of Tigard's Canvass of Votes for council positions on the November 8, 2022 ballot. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City of Tigard had four offices on the November 8, 2022 ballot. Washington County Elections Manager Dan Forester has submitted a certified abstract of votes and this is attached. The City Recorder canvasses the votes and a copy is filed with the City Council to officially "Receive and File" the information for the record. The Accumulative Summary of Ballots Cast per Contest shows: •Heidi Lueb with 52.02% of the votes cast received the most votes and was elected to the office of mayor. •Yi-Kang Hu with 38.34% of the votes cast received the most votes and was elected to the office of city councilor. •Jai Raj Singh with 24.01% of the votes cast received the second most votes and was elected to the office of city councilor. •Maureen Wolf with 62.20% of the votes cast received the most votes and was elected to the office of city councilor for the 2-year unexpired term. Attached are the certified Ballots Cast per Contest, the Certified Ballots Cast per Contest with Precincts, and a precinct map. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this Consent Agenda item. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Attachments Certified Ballots Cast per Contest-Accumulative Summary Certified Ballots Cast per Contest with Precincts Tigard Precinct Map Ballots Cast per Contest-Accumulative Summary Page:9 of 13 Washington County November 8 2022 General Election 2022-12-05 All Precincts,All Districts,All Counter Groups,All ScanStations,All Contests,All Boxes 09:02:00 Official Election Results Total Ballots Cast:257479, Registered Voters:387173, Overall Turnout:66.50% Choice Votes Vote% Total 6694 100.00% Overvotes 0 Undervotes 3063 City of Sherwood,Council Members(Vote for 4) 9757 ballots(0 over voted ballots,0 overvotes, 14784 undervotes),13863 registered voters,turnout 70.38% Taylor Giles 5931 24.46% Keith Mays 6066 25.02% . Doug Scott 5869 24.21% ,,A_'.�/ A Dan Standke 5812 23.97% �'�- it �'t Write-in 301 1.24% q ,.•: Write-in 115 0.47% ` �'� Write-in 83 0.34% <: .^'4 jy , , MP3 •i Write-in 67 0.28% �•�r;r., ) Total 24244 100.00% V �J r~ '- ` Overvotes 0 x r. r _ ;ce • Undervotes 14784 1,; , i .- ; , -, City of Tigard,Mayor(Vote for 1) 25829 ballots 4 over voted ballots,4 overvotes.2574 undervotes),38126 registered voters,turnout 67.75% John Goodhouse 6581 28.30% Heidi Lueb 12096 52.02% Nick Hess 4499 19.35% Write-in _ 75 0.32% Total 23251 100.00% Overvotes 4 Undervotes 2574 City of Tigard,Council Members(Vote for 2) 25829 ballots(6 over voted ballots. 12 overvotes. 14239 undervotes),38126 registered voters,turnout 67.75% Jai Raj Singh 8980 24.01% Derrick Wright 5212 13.93% Tom Anderson 8464 22.63% YI-Kang Hu 14342 38.34% I Write-in 334 0.89% Write-in 75 0.20% Total 37407 100.00% Overvotes 12 Undervotes 14239 City of Tigard,Council 2 Year Unexpired Term(Vote for 1) 25829 ballots(440 over voted ballots.440 overvotes.4743 undervotes),38126 registered voters,turnout 67.75% Karen Marrello 4413 21.37% Maureen Wolf 12841 62.20% Austin Johnson 3250 15.74% Write-in 142 0.69% Total 20646 100.00% Overvotes 440 Undervotes 4743 City of Tualatin,Mayor(Vote for 1) 10529 ballots(1 over voted ballots. 1 overvotes.3621 undervotes),15949 registered voters,turnout 66.02% Frank Bubenik 6607 95.66% Write-in 300 4.34% Total 6907 100.00% Overvotes 1 Undervotes 3621 City of Tualatin,Council Member,Position 1 (Vote for 1) 10529 ballots:0 over voted ballots.0 overvotes.4053 undervotes),15949 registered voters,turnout 66.02% Maria Reyes 6322 97.62% Ballots Cast per Contest with Precincts Page:87 of 138 Washington County November 8,2022 General Election 2022-12-05 All Precincts,All Districts,All Counter Groups,All ScanStations,All Contests,All Boxes 09:06:46 Official Election Results Total Ballots Cast:257479. Registered Voters:387173. Overall Turnout:66.50% City of Tigard, Mayor(Vote for 1) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total John Goodhouse Heidi Lueb Nick Hess Write-in Cast Voters Votes Precinct 400 3075 4908 2751 758 27.55% 1481 53.83% 499 18.14% 13 0.47% Precinct 402 5647 7870 5123 1569 30.63% 2500 48.80% 1044 20.38% 10 0.20% Precinct 404 4796 7490 4386 1261 28.75% 2275 51.87% 838 19.11% 12 0.27% Precinct 405 6719 9226 6088 1770 29.07% 3230 53.08% 1059 17.39% 29 0.48% Precinct 409 3800 5882 3356 819 24,40% 1833 54.62% 696 20.74% 8 0.24% Precinct 411 856 1336 707 175 24.75% 371 52.48% 159 22.49% 2 0,28% Precinct 427 936 1414 840 229 27.26% 406 48.33% 204 24.29%, 1 0.12% Total 25829 38126 23251 6581 28.30% 12096 52.02% 4499 19.35% 75 0.32% Via, 4:t , ,';','10.1. 101i. 2=1t r r if1 i Ballots Cast per Contest with Precincts Page:88 of 138 Washington County November 8,2022 General Election 2022-12-05 All Precincts,All Districts,All Counter Groups,All ScanStations,All Contests,All Boxes 09:06:46 Official Election Results Total Ballots Cast:257479.Registered Voters:387173, Overall Turnout:66.50% City of Tigard, Mayor(Vote for 1) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total Over Under Cast Voters '.•otes Votes Votes Precinct 400 3075 4908 2751 0 324 Precinct 402 5647 7870 5123 2 522 Precinct 404 4796 7490 4386 0 410 Precinct 405 6719 9228 6088 1 630 Precinct 409 3800 5882 3356 0 444 Precinct 411 856 1336 707 1 148 Precinct 427 936 1414 1340 0 9i, Total 25829 38126 23251 4 2574 11 i i wi Ballots Cast per Contest with Precincts Page: 89 of 138 Washington County November 8,2022 General Election 2022-12-05 All Precincts,All Districts,All Counter Groups,All ScanStations,All Contests,All Boxes 09:06:46 Official Election Results Total Ballots Cast:257479. Registered Voters:387173, Overall Turnout:66.50% City of Tigard, Council Members (Vote for 2) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total Jai Raj Singh Derrick Wright Tom Anderson Yi-Kang Hu Cast Voters Votes Precinct 400 3075 4908 4375 1195 27.31% 634 14.49% 825 18.86% 1674 38.26% Precinct 402 5647 7870 8289 1737 20.96% 1242 14.98% 2078 25.07% 3146 37.95% Precinct 404 4796 7490 7046 1747 24.79% 1087 15.43% 1445 20.51% 2675 37:96% Precinct 405 6719 9226 9839 2242 22.79% 1283 13.04% 2440 24.80% 3775 38.37% Precinct 409 3800 5882 5410 1392 25.73% 672 12.42% 1164 21.52% 2125 39.28% Precinct 411 856 1336 1113 330 29.65% 136 12.22% 201 18.06% 437 39.26% Precinct 427 936 1414 1335 337 25.24% 158 11.84% 311 23.30% 510 38.20% E Total 25829 38126 37407 8980 24.01% 5212 13.93% 8464 22.63% 14342 38.34% i 1 , i Ballots Cast per Contest with Precincts Page: 90 of 138 Washington County November 8,2022 General Election 2022-12-05 All Precincts,All Districts,All Counter Groups,All ScanStations,All Contests,All Boxes 09:06:46 Official Election Results Total Ballots Cast:257479 Registered Voters:387173,Overall Turnout:66.50% I City of Tigard, Council Members (Vote for 2) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total Write-in Write-in Over Under I Cast Voters Votes Votes Votes 1 Precinct 400 3075 4908 4375 42 0.96% 5 0.11% 2 1773 Precinct 402 5647 7870 8289 68 0.82% 18 0.22% 4 3001 Precinct 404 4796 7490 7046 70 0.99% 22 0.31% 0 2546 Precinct 405 6719 9226 9839 85 0.86% 14 0.14% 6 3593 i Precinct 409 3800 5882 5410 46 0.85% 11 0.20% 0 2190 i Precinct 411 856 1336 1113 8 0.72% 1 0.09% 0 599 Precinct 427 936 1414 1335 15 .1.12% 4 0.30% 0 537 Total 25829 38126 37407 334 0.89% 75 0.20% 12 14239 7 Ballots Cast per Contest with Precincts Page:91 of 138 Washington County November 8, 2022 General Election 2022-12-05 All Precincts,All Districts,All Counter Groups,All ScanStations,All Contests,All Boxes 09:06:46 Official Election Results Total Ballots Cast:257479 Registered Voters: 387.173, Overall Turnout:66.50% City of Tigard, Council 2 Year Unexpired Term (Vote for 1) Precinct Ballots Reg. Total Karen Marrello Maureen Wolf Austin Johnson Write-in Cast Voters Votes Precinct 400 3075 4908 2431 483 19.87% 1535 63.14% 403 16.58% 10 0.41% Precinct 402 5647 7870 4586 1038 22.63% 2819 61.47% 702 15,31% 27 0.59% Precinct 404 4796 7490 3895 848 21.77% 2366 60.74% 648 16.64% 33 0.85% Precinct 405 6719 9226 5383 1112 20.66% 3454 64.16% 780 14.49% 37 0.69% Precinct 409 3800 5882 2974 622 20.91% 1860 62.54% 467 15.70% 25 0.84% Precinct 411 856 1336 641 142 22.15% 372 58.03% 123 19.19% 4 0.62% Precinct 427 936 1414 736 168 22.83% 435 59.10% 127 17.26% 6 0.82% Total 25829 38126 20646 4413 21.37% 12841 62.20% 3250 15.74% 142 0.69% , Ballots Cast per Contest with Precincts Page:92 of 138 Washington County November 8,2022 General Election 2022-12-05 All Precincts,All Districts,All Counter Groups,All ScanStations,All Contests,All Boxes 09:06:46 Official Election Results Total Ballots Cast:257479. Registered Voters:387173, Overall Turnout:66.50% City of Tigard, Council 2 Year Unexpired Term (Vote for 1) Precinct Ballots Reg Total Over Under Cast Voters Votes Votes Votes Precinct 400 3075 4908 2431 49 595 Precinct 402 5647 7870 4586 104 957 Precinct 404 4796 7490 3895 82 819 Precinct 405 6719 9226 5383 120 1216 Precinct 409 3800 5882 2974 64 762 Precinct 411 856 1336 641 8 207 Precinct 427 936 1414 736 13 187 Total 25829 38126 20646 440 4743 1 1 r I pxwy I i iS Dui d\spunaad (upuq uiwpe q spXi i Gapegdei i 8uissaooadoaDZnapgps}88ii aped 1 i 1___ },c C • \. � ., I Q21VJ11 nob Jo-p E81�'n nnM rr 1- ._.i r�._ 817.E 1 as=Nl==lbrlbnl 1.. 5Z� IL IV-6E9 £0 S - :._,r----..---, r---f / o 5ris £ZZL6 21O `Pae$[1 _ Z !- 'i NI .0447 0 -Ya I � .Ti�_d' ��i o�� IZ isght pAi IIEH MS SZ I £ 1 o�-��€1 1+u ' uoSa.7p 'p.re$11 ;o Alii '=Z � /fir C -t--;-`", £Z -1-41-1 �- r-- 0W - 11 ---2., - ...,/,0, , , �,,,.�'n' to - - r'' { r -- ZZOZ/SZ/5:paleau7 dw �1-;:-E 10 — ! 1 's,„„ _.ITT �� cliVtilltlipld �+ z ,, "— f�l �� dd , � 4"2j mI I EV 41ai — 1,rc ,1,„o-401- _ I I Is M T1 /��7j` saliw # ` -tali� a-a 1144.1 .no llV `� 4b�4N`3'8 X3'3 -� 1 II 1 ; alEDS 1 i`I�— - 6Tb 08Z_: d l !�� W ' H y� L t, 7L7 0 9Zb ti #I -r-. _t nip, . __- - i , tj, 1 1 _ D _ � £ i' ?t } 1 ' i; � 11 I � j\:<. 1 . � n \ 4- _ .j,.._.__,....._ L goy, 7'' Titrr 1 --�Iz m � t ` fr IrI. srll'f18-1 �� - fT+ V�= a SMoova tAlly-No9'3ao, +a At/M as/ �:. .. ~� _ {� + i A;7EN ls __ u ? . s-aavv� I— i_,- I_ ✓i:: I - t _I dM„_.(Wra, /, f.S+SZ f1 . . 1,E ,:;,_,, 1 �_ �r /j. �— . � ,,,. � ..: , \A''') -,4b _ . . 4 1f_r , I 0Tti i ; ��. a� ZOti , 1` ;r wvHs3ao .,...., oaoasarr, #..:„..i. Lir--I �d►a, o �!�®� 0 f i, N ? 1`t �_. -�y �`"4. l' z- ~ ONViltiOd —_ <"'`.. ` + �J/�♦ •ai !Q,y ,o'p `-`. i I i.. - _ `:�..+'./' ., o 1. ? --/ZILI 22-..—,-.1_1 h'�, 2c�' / \.,i```ce , _- �� I ��. f v*”; d it aannv3NVA dew Alui�ip i f m. 1 ! � a y ` i 1'S=H•1(1 p, 1 �lC'$�'✓<� r �, ` o' +-t 9�V 9=018 i-1: I `”.4a% _r__ �y I i t==--i-. I - i off, r t L ,t oy 4-� i I I `� Z -- eijit.• ,... w 00 r c - r I i ! fli•X I I i '; '.7"" � —;mal. C T 0 5£ oho -�— - �1.!T —1 m Js.. fi/ _o IFIL60b;` /c.:0--- - "�� 4 , 3'/'b f +� d Axepuno8 la.0 p.uE21l l I - ,7,._ ? -.' ___j_ 6..h t..� S in d8' -_1 F _ l ! NO ;_..... .._ ' ' - i 56£ rr ' UOQTJOATD t oa�� - _' ' �. . 66£ --- - _ '�� j i 1 _ _ann - - . ' �,_ n �} wj (� ani ! y`t �` �? _ _ I +i`fit t ! 2 x'057 0i1 E3 A V a r£8- c.17)," �T'` C.3_ .-p �- .�,M { i 4 t _ n i - i-... -'- . . n 1 Aj- ✓ 3 ar} }Z.0- E, - , a,, f r .-. _._�.,1 _t ��, m -,,.�_, • I_P-419_ IT dab=213 Iw3l1 • Aj--- --.........1 i.4 t„-(1.,L., ,_,L.,...__1_1_ '- ' 9 r._._ip• 1s�Ndwx�oaa _I I, I_- , i. i. / ��Z6F 1oti 88£ J -f a ;._ os£ ,- (77-34—iZtEti , AIS-5070 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2022 Length (in minutes):45 Minutes Agenda Title: 2023 State and Federal Legislative Agendas Authored By: Nicole Hendrix Presented By: Nicole Hendrix, Senior Management Analyst Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Each year City Council considers council goals, community and partners'priorities,issues and opportunities for Tigard to represent its interests at the state and federal level in legislative and agency meetings. Council is asked to review the 2023 recommended priorities,provide input, and recommend City Council adopt the state and federal legislative agendas in January. ACTION REQUESTED • Review the attached legislative priorities lists; •Recommend addition,removal, or edits to legislative items; and •Recommend City Council consider adoption of state and federal agendas in January for Tigard's 2023 advocacy. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Tigard team presents the attached recommended items for inclusion in Tigard's 2023 state and federal legislative agendas. The attached lists provide overarching initiatives along with specific items and requests the Tigard team will pursue for the upcoming state session and federal opportunities. Tigard's federal priorities feature grant and appropriation requests,Transportation and Infrastructure initiatives, and Housing and Support Services. The Tigard team will be working closely with Congresswoman-elect Salinas and her team as part of the state's 6th Congressional District. Tigard is engaging the assistance of CFM Communications to help the city advocate for federal funding opportunities including pursuing grant and appropriation requests for 2023. CFM has noted, "if Congress finalizes an FY2023 appropriations bill, either this month or at some point next year, the legislation is expected to include the Congressionally Directed Spending (earmark) projects included in each chamber's draft proposals." Tigard is ready for and plans to submit earmark requests in 2023. The Oregon state legislature has a long session in 2023 from February to June.Tigard's priorities for this legislative session are Transportation and Infrastructure,Housing and Support Services, and additional opportunities. Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations This is the first time City Council will review the 2023 legislative priority list. If recommended by Council, this item will go before City Council for formal adoption on January 10th,2023 to allow new city council members an opportunity for review. Upon Council adoption, the Tigard team will produce the final state and federal agenda. In August 2022, City Council was provided the League of Oregon Cities legislative priorities for 2023. Those included: 1.Local Funding to Address Homelessness 2. Infrastructure Funding to Support Needed Housing 3. Property Tax Reform 4.Building Decarbonization,Efficiency, and Modernization 5. Road User Fee—Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Structure Impacts (Community, Budget, Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) The state and federal legislative agendas help guide policy and advocacy actions in 2023. The recommended priority lists reflect and advance programs and projects outlined by Tigard's Community Promise, Council Goals, and Strategic Plan values of equitable,walkable,healthy, and accessible. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION City Council may recommend addition,removal, or edits to legislative items. The Tigard team suggests City Council recommend adoption of the legislative agendas in January. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES The League of Oregon Cities adopted legislative priorities can be found here:Legislative Priorities https://www.orcities.org/advocacy/legislative-advocacy/priorities Attachments Powerpoint Presentation-Legislative Agendas 2023 Federal Legislative Agenda Items 2023 State Legislative Agenda Items 2023 Tigard Legislative Priorities City Council December 13, 2022 i1GARD Council Action ➢ Review and discuss items on the 2023 legislative priority lists; ➢ Recommend addition, removal, or edits to legislative items; and ➢ Recommend City Council consider adoption of state and federal agendas in January. TIGARD Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. Agenda PConsiderations • National League of Cities • City initiatives such as and League of Oregon City Council Goals, Community priorities Promise, & Strategic Plan: • Recommendations from our ❖ Houselessness federal advocacy group, CFM ❖ COVID Response • Input for internal teams and ❖ Climate Action leadership ❖ Parks & Recreation ❖ Strategic Plan ❖ Community Promise II " TIGARD Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. Federal Priority List Action: Review and discuss items on the legislative priority lists. City Funding Transportation and Infrastructure Grant requests ❖ Resilient ❖ High-speed •'• A ro riation infrastructure rail • pp p requests •'• SW Corridor Light ' Affordable q housing Rail ❖ Restore advanced ❖ Building refunding •. Electric mobility energy code •'• Digital access 111 TIGARD Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. State Priority List Action: Review and discuss items on the legislative priority lists. Transportation and Housing and Additional Infrastructure Support Services Opportunities ODOT arterialsHouselessness ❖ Enterprise State ofGood Repair services zones ❖ ODOT project delivery ❖ System Development Kicker reform Charges ❖ Tolling & road pricing Mental h I h Police reform Digital access services •; Building code ADA standards Affordable housing reform ••• Tenant protections ••• Property tax reform TIGARD Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. Council Action • Review and discuss items on the legislative priority lists; • Recommend addition, removal, or edits to legislative items; and • Recommend City Council consider adoption of state and federal agendas in January. II I " TIGARD I II TIGARD City of Tigard 2023 Tigard Federal Legislative Agenda Items Grant and Appropriation Requests Universal Plaza Phase 2.The City is requesting$2 million to complete Phase 2 of Universal Plaza, which includes construction of a ADA-accessible community room and 6,840 sf architectural canopy over the plaza's southern edge, expanding the functionality of Tigard's signature outdoor public space.The Community Room is a stand-alone building that continues the natural palette of the canopy while maximizing light,views, and connection to Universal Plaza using glass roll up doors.The open and inviting space is for community and educational events, capitalizing on the plaza's central location and proximity to the 18-mile Fanno Creek Park and trail.The new canopy is an iconic form that will quickly become the defining architectural feature of Tigard. It provides weather protection for a market promenade,food vendors, and performances for community congregation and connection. Rising to over 26 feet at its highest point, the canopy opens to downtown at one end while embracing Fanno Creek at the other, serving as the connection between Tigard's urban and natural environments. Universal Plaza is intentionally located in downtown Tigard, a diverse neighborhood home to many socially vulnerable residents who lack access to public amenities.The low-income neighborhoods of more than 6,000 residents adjacent to Universal Plaza have a greater proportion of low-income residents than anywhere else in the City with a poverty rate of 22%, compared to 9%City-wide. Black, Indigenous, and People of Color(BIPOC) as well as low-income residents must travel further to enjoy the health benefits of public spaces. Understanding this,the City has prioritized equity in making public investments in its parks system.The Fanno Creek Regional Trail System, commuter rail, and active transportation options are all within walking distance of the Plaza. Universal Plaza is optimally located to serve Tigard's most historically underserved populations. Hall Blvd Safety Improvements. SW Hall Boulevard is a state-owned urban arterial that traverses Beaverton, unincorporated Washington County, and the City of Tigard.The failing assets along this corridor, and the insufficient facilities supporting safety and capacity, have led the City to pursue negotiations with ODOT in favor of transferring Hall Boulevard, where it runs through Tigard,to the City so that it can be better managed and maintained in line with our community's vision. Funding for infrastructure improvements to a state of good repair would facilitate the transfer of this facility to the City. Funding and support for safety and betterments on Hall Boulevard would allow the City to provide the community with the transportation system they deserve: safe, accessible, functional, and reliable. Hall Boulevard through Tigard serves numerous residences, businesses, parks, schools, and transit. Vision Zero Action Plan.The City is requesting$300,000 through the US Department of Transportation's Safe Streets and Roads for All program to complete a Vizion Zero Action Plan. Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate traffic fatalities and severe injuries,while increasing safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all. The Plan, guided by conversations with the community,will direct strategic, equitable capital and programmatic investments in coordination with jurisdictional partners to reduce and eliminate serious injuries and fatality on our community's roadways. Development of this Plan will position Tigard to compete for grants and other resources to construct needed safety improvements on our system. 1 I II TIGARD City of Tigard Community Resilience Center.The City of Tigard is requesting$2 million to transform the Tigard Public Library into a Community Resilience Center for emergency cooling and heating. Currently,there is no designated community warming, cooling, or clean air center in Tigard.As the frequency of extreme weather events increase, it's imperative that Tigard's unhoused and vulnerable residents have a safe, accessible place to seek shelter during extreme weather events. Climate Action Plan.The City plans to request federal funding to develop a Climate Action Plan to develop and prioritize investments and policies to make progress on the City's climate mitigation and adaptation goals.The Climate Action Plan will center equity in the recommended policies, plans, and investments to move the community towards a more resilient future. Neighborhood Access and Equity Grant Program.The City's social vulnerability mapping indicates that some of Tigard's BIPOC, lower-income, and historically underserved communities have limited access to connection and opportunity because of infrastructure configuration and design. State and County roadways, especially Hall Blvd and Greenburg Rd, currently create barriers;with investment in pedestrian infrastructure and safe crossings,the livability, safety, and access along these corridors would be improved. Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicle Program.The City request's support for opportunities to obtain cleaner heavy-duty City fleet vehicles and related charging infrastructure. Transportation and Infrastructure The City of Tigard supports equitable, accessible, safe, and climate--friendly transportation and infrastructure policy and investments. Resilient Infrastructure. Cities need support to build and invest in sustainable, resilient, and inclusive infrastructure. Direct investment from the Federal government will help meet the growing demands on our infrastructure to support a growing economy and resilient communities. Southwest Corridor Light Rail. The City is part of a coalition working to extend light rail service from Portland to Tigard.The 1-5 corridor serves Tigard and regional cities and is among the most congested in the nation; it is expected to see a 17 percent increase in person-hours of congestion by 2035.The proposed Light Rail corridor serving Tigard, Beaverton, Portland, and other regional cities, is expected to carry around 40,000 passengers daily, reducing congestion and mitigating climate impacts from single- occupancy vehicle travel. Electric Mobility Transition. Further increase access to electric mobility infrastructure and incentives for electric mobility adoption in low-income households and communities to ensure that the electric mobility transition is equitable. Ensure new funding programs are inclusive of micro-mobility modes, shared mobility, and Mobility as a Service models. 2 I II TIGARD City of Tigard Broadband and Digital Access. Support and funding for increased broadband infrastructure deployment and technical assistance is critical to economic development, education, health and safety and the ability of residents to be linked to their governments.The pandemic has only amplified the need for digital access. High-Speed Rail. Provide funding for the development of a high-speed rail line in the Pacific Northwest as a driver of economic development and innovation in the transportation sector. Affordable Housing.The City supports legislation to remove barriers for local governments to address the housing affordability crisis and federal investments that increase access to, and supply of, affordable housing units. Building Energy Code Adoption and Energy and Water Efficiency in Affordable Housing. Both programs would support implementation of Tigard's Climate and Community Resiliency initiatives. The former would support our advocacy for the state; in the latter,we would prioritize improvements at supportive housing for the elderly and low-income housing. Restore Advanced Refunding.The City supports refinancing of municipal bonds which was eliminated in the 2017 tax bill. Refinancing bonds lowers the debt service for local governments and is a financing tool that reduces the burden on community members. 3 I II TIGARD City of Tigard 2023 Tigard State Legislative Agenda Items Transportation and Infrastructure—The City of Tigard supports equitable, accessible, safe, and climate- friendly transportation and infrastructure policy and investments. State of Good Repair and ODOT-owned Urban Arterials.The City seeks funding for State of Good Repair, complete street, and safety improvements on SW Hall Boulevard to implement the community's vision for this corridor. ODOT, Washington County, and City of Tigard are advancing discussions on the potential transfer of three to four miles of Hall Blvd to the City in favor of improved management and maintenance of this facility. ODOT Project Delivery. Increase funding for ODOT project delivery capacity especially for active transportation infrastructure to avoid costly delays to local agencies. Tolling and Road Pricing. Federal funding provides an opportunity for ODOT to ensure a coordinated approach to tolling across the regional system. Road pricing is an important tool to manage congestion, and revenue generated through a program should be used to provide equitable transportation alternatives. Broadband and Digital Access. Support and funding for increased, affordable, and accessible broadband infrastructure deployment and technical assistance is critical to economic development, education, health and safety and the ability of residents to be linked to their governments. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)Standards. In 2019, the City of Tigard updated its mandated ADA self-evaluation and Transition Plan.The Plan identifies needed mitigation within City facilities to be compliant with the ADA. Ongoing funding is requested to maintain accessible City facilities. Housing and Support Services—Tigard supports increased funding and legislation for stable housing and support services. Houselessness Services.Tigard supports increased funding for resources to unhoused individuals and families, especially in crisis situations. Additional and stable State funding will help local governments meet the growing demand for services in the region and save public resources. City of Tigard supports per capita funding amounting to approximately$2.2 million to respond to immediate health and wellness services. This would entail the operation and maintenance of emergency/temporary shelters, safe spaces, hygiene stations, debris removal, an encampment removal program, and access to information. The City requests$1 million for emergency Pallet shelter sites, serving as a bridge to access long term housing and services through our partnerships.Additionally,Just Compassion of Washington County has a funding gap of$4 million for their resource center which would be a valuable tool for Tigard and neighboring cities to help move people into a stable environment. 1 I II TIGARD City of Tigard System Development Charge (SDC) Reform. Affordable Housing SDCs. Exemptions from local SDCs are one of the most effective incentives that a local government can provide to support affordable housing development. However,these exemptions impact the ability of cities to provide necessary infrastructure improvements. With the state supporting partial or full backfill of local SDC exemptions, municipalities will be better positioned to encourage affordable housing development in their communities. Climate SDCs. Currently, SDCs may only be levied for certain infrastructural systems, including transportation, water, sewer, parks, and stormwater. However, cities are increasingly facing the need to fund infrastructure improvements related to climate mitigation and adaptation. ORS 223.299 should be amended to expand the definition of "capital improvement"to include climate-responsive infrastructure. Mental Health Services.The City of Tigard and the League of Oregon Cities supports the delivery of mental health services to ensure those who need help can access those services easily, especially for the youth community. Affordable Housing.Tigard supports legislation that would provide state funds to cover local system development charges for the development of affordable housing. Along with League of Oregon Cities,Tigard supports efforts from the state to provide additional resources to local governments to increase the development of affordable housing. Affordable Housing Contract Expirations.The City of Tigard supports reform to ORS 456.260 and OAR 813-115-0030 to protect existing affordable units and requests the state fund an acquisition program for similar properties. Construction Excise Tax(CET) Reform. Currently, cities with a CET must remit 15%of their proceeds from a residential CET to the Oregon Housing and Community Services department to be used for affordable homeownership programs in that community. In practice,very little if any of those funds have been distributed, and there is a lack of transparency for the remitting city as to how the funds are earmarked and used. Cities are better equipped to allocate and distribute their CET funds locally without an intermediary. ORS 320.195 should be amended to remove the 15% required remittance to OHCS and return all CET proceeds to local control. Tenant Protections. Rent Assistance.The state is seeing crisis-level increases in its number of unhoused residents. Rent assistance programs should be expanded to assure that Oregon's housing crisis does not grow worse. Rent Cap Reform. Senate Bill 608 implemented landmark rent reform, capping annual increases to give tenants much-needed relief. However, the bill merits improvement. Allowable rent increases have exceeded 9%every year, with an allowable increase in 2023 of 14.6%.These figures are simply not sustainable over time,with Oregon's wage growth 2 I II TIGARD City of Tigard not keeping pace. Allowable rent increases should still be pegged to CPI, but the baseline should be reduced from 7%to 3%or lower. Right to Counsel. Current state tenant protection laws place the onus for enforcement actions on tenants, who must find legal counsel and file suit to recover damages from a landlord in violation of those laws. This approach represents an inequitable barrier to tenants without access, knowledge, money, or language skills to navigate the legal system to assert their rights.The state should establish a right to counsel for tenants and a legal aid fund to ensure adherence to tenant protection laws. Property Tax Reform.Tigard supports past efforts to allow cities to use more property tax tools to address local funding issues, including support for referral to voters that would allow local control of temporary property tax outside of statewide caps; amending the state constitution to reset a property's assessed value to its real market value at the time of sale or construction; and a statutory change regarding the way new property is added to the tax rolls to provide the option of applying a citywide changed property rate to new property. Additional Opportunities Enterprise Zones. Continued support for Enterprise Zone programs to be within the purview of localities with no addition of prevailing wage requirements to create better economic opportunities. Kicker Reform. Reform the state's kicker refund program to ensure that state priorities and programs related to equitable housing opportunity, multimodal transportation, environmental protection, and economic development are met and fully funded before rebates occur. Police Reform. Tigard is committed to racial equity and justice as we cultivate an equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. With this vision,Tigard will monitor this session for legislation around police reform. Building Code Reform.The City encourages review of building code to improve opportunities for energy efficiency and climate mitigation. 3 AIS-5058 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2022 Length (in minutes):30 Minutes Agenda Title: Legislative Public Hearing: Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities Required Parking Reform Authored By: Schuyler Warren Presented By: Item Type: Motion Requested Ordinance Public Hearing-Legislative Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The City of Tigard proposes legislative text amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code (TCDC). The text amendments remove minimum parking requirements for developments citywide in accordance with the Council's direction. ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission and the Community Development team recommend City Council adopt the text amendments and the findings included as attachments to the Ordinance. BACKGROUND INFORMATION On September 6,2022, the Community Development team briefed Council on the background related to the Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) rulemaking.This rulemaking began shortly after Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order 20-04 in the spring of 2020, directing state agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the state. As part of this order, the Department of Land Conservation and Development was charged with updating the state's Transportation Planning Rule and other administrative rules to reduce the emissions caused by transportation and land use patterns. Currently, the transportation sector accounts for more than a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions nationwide, and more than 40% of emissions in Oregon. Despite the efforts to reduce the carbon impact of the state's transportation system over the past two decades, emissions have grown annually. The CFEC rules are intended to start the state down the road of addressing the climate emergency and issues of equity. They are primarily focused on the revision of the state's transportation planning rule. Those revisions can be divided into two primary areas of reform. The first is an overhaul of the way that long-range transportation planning is conducted and the types of projects that should be prioritized in that planning. The second area of reform is related to land use planning tied to transportation,primarily parking. The requirements related to parking are one of the most time-constrained elements of the new administrative rules. These mandated parking reforms are required to be adopted in two phases - one by December 31, 2022, and the other by June 30, 2023. Following on the first briefing, the Community Development team returned to Council on September 27, 2022, to make a recommendation to Council on the path to compliance with the required parking reforms. Following the discussion, the Council directed the Community Development team to prepare code amendments to remove minimum parking requirements. Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations 9/6/22 - Council briefing on adopted CFEC rules. 9/27/22 - Council briefing and direction on preferred alternative. Public Involvement City teammates have led a discussion with the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission. Impacts (Community, Budget, Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) The proposed code amendments will have no impact on budget. The rules and the City's work to bring the development code into compliance with them are both in alignment with adopted policies. •Strategic Vision-The adopted CFEC rules are the result of Governor Brown's Executive Order 20-04,requiring state agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This goal is in alignment with the City's own Strategic Vision focus on health, equity, and walkability. •Strategic Plan-The rules are also in alignment with multiple policies of the Strategic Plan. •Strategic Priority 2 - Create a well-connected, attractive, and accessible pedestrian network. •Strategic Priority 3 - Ensure development and growth support the vision. •Objective 3.1 - Pursue land development that maximizes public health benefits while increasing connection between people and community destinations. •Objective 3.2 - Focus development-associated resources in parts of the city that have the capacity to serve,house, employ, and attract the most people with the least impact on Tigard's natural systems and the climate. •B. Facilitate Transit Oriented Development (TOD) that supports employment, housing, and community services. •E. Incorporate sustainable and low-impact building and site planning technologies into city codes and standards. •Objective 3.5 - Plan and create in a manner that reduces climate impacts to the maximum extent practicable, especially for those most vulnerable. •E. Evaluate development projects for their contribution to VMT reduction, compact development form, and sustainable use of resources. •Transportation System Plan-The adopted Transportation System Plan is focused on bringing equitable transportation opportunity and facilities to the City of Tigard,with an emphasis on Greenhouse Gas reduction. This is in alignment with the CFEC rules. •Council Goals -Develop and implement a bold community resiliency plan. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission and the Community Development team recommend City Council adopt the text amendments and the findings included as attachments to the Ordinance. Council could instead opt to not adopt the text amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code. In this event, state law would pre-empt local code, and minimum parking requirements would automatically be removed for about two-thirds of the city as of January 1. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Attachments Ordinance Exhibit A- Recommendation and Findings Exhibit A-Attachment 1 Exhibit A-Attachment 2 Presentation CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 22- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 18) FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADOPTING THE PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE UPDATE (DCA2022-00005). WHEREAS, on March 10, 2020, the Governor of Oregon issued Executive Order 20-04, directing state agencies to reduce and regulate greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS, the Department of Land Conservation and Development commenced a two-year rulemaking process to amend the Transportation Planning Rule to comply with the Governor's order; and WHEREAS, the Land Conservation and Development Commission adopted amendments to the Transportation Planning Rule on July 21,2022; and WHEREAS, the adopted rules require the City of Tigard to amend the Tigard Community Development Code to remove or modify minimum parking requirements; and WHEREAS, the adopted rules require the City of Tigard to amend the Tigard Community Development Code to remove or modify minimum parking requirements; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has considered the options available and elected to repeal minimum parking requirements; and WHEREAS, the repeal of minimum parking requirements is in alignment with the City of Tigard's vision and goals; and WHEREAS, the City Council generally desires to improve the function, efficiency, and clarity of the Community Development Code to make development approvals more efficient and equitable; and WHEREAS, the City has initiated an application to amend the text of the Community Development Code (Title 18); and WHEREAS, notice was provided to the Department of Land Conservation and Development and Metro prior to the first evidentiary public hearing; and WHEREAS, notice to the public was provided in accordance with the Tigard Community Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Tigard Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 7, 2022 and recommended by unanimous vote that Council approve the proposed amendments; and ORDINANCE No. 22- Page 1 WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council held a public hearing on December 13, 2022 to consider the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council has determined that the proposed amendments are consistent with the applicable review criteria as demonstrated in the City's findings. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Tigard City Council adopts the findings contained in "Exhibit A" to this Ordinance. The findings and conclusions that are attached as Exhibit A are hereby adopted as the basis in support of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: The Tigard Community Development Code (Title 18) is amended as shown in "Attachment 1 to Exhibit A". SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its passage by the council, signature by the mayor,and posting by the city recorder PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of , 2022. Carol A. Mager, City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2022. Jason B. Snider,Mayor Approved as to form: City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No. 22- Page 2 RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY CASE NAME: PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE PROJECT CASE NO.: Development Code Amendment (DCA) DCA2022-00005 PROPOSAL: The City of Tigard proposes legislative amendments to the Tigard Community Development Code (TCDC) to remove minimum parking requirements in order to comply with the Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities Rules (OAR 660-012- 0400). The proposed text amendments are included in Attachment 1, and summarized below in Section IV of this report: APPLICANT: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 ZONES: Citywide LOCATION: Citywide APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Statewide Planning Goals 1 (Citizen Involvement), 2 (Land Use Planning); Oregon Administrative Rules 660-012-0400; Comprehensive Plan Goals 1.1.2, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.24; and Tigard Development Code Chapters 18.710 and 18.790. SECTION II. PLANIING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the proposed amendments, to include technical edits provided by Vice President Jackson, and with any alterations as determined appropriate by the City Council through the public hearing process. PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE DCA2022-00005 12/13/2022 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS PAGE 1 OF 7 SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PROJECT SUMMARY The Parking Reform Compliance project will bring the City of Tigard into compliance with the provisions of the Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) rules adopted by the State of Oregon's Land Conservation and Development Commission on July 25, 2022. These rules were developed in consultation with a broad group of stakeholders including city staff, over the course of two years. The rulemaking process began after Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order 20-04 in the spring of 2020, directing state agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the state.As part of this order, the Department of Land Conservation and Development was charged with updating the state's Transportation Planning Rule and other administrative rules to reduce the emissions caused by transportation and land use patterns. Currently, the transportation sector accounts for more than a quarter of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions nationwide, and more than 40 percent of emission in Oregon. Despite the efforts to reduce the carbon impact of the state's transportation system over the past two decades, emissions have grown annually. The CFEC rules are intended to start the state down the road of addressing the climate emergency and issues of equity.They are focused on two primary areas of reform. The first, and by far the most expansive,is an overhaul of the way that long-range transportation planning is conducted, and the types of projects that should be prioritized in that planning. The second area of reform,though smaller in scope,is no less important to meeting the state's GHG reduction targets. This area is related to land use planning for vehicle parking. Most development codes across the country mandate off-street parking for uses and development. One of the issues is that the standards for these parking mandates are based on flawed or outdated analyses of actual parking need. An increasing number of cities of all sizes across the country are recognizing the impact of these mandates on their climate goals and urban form and removing all parking requirements from their development codes. This does not eliminate parking, just a government mandate for parking. Multiple case studies have shown that the market is well-suited to provide the parking that is appropriate to development without mandates. The City of Tigard has its own case study for this outcome in the Tigard Triangle,where the Lean Code adopted in 2017 removed all minimum parking requirements. Since that time, development in the Triangle has continued apace, with adequate parking provided. The state's requirements related to parking are one of the most time-constrained elements of the new administrative rules. These mandated parking reforms are required to be adopted in two phases—one by December 31, 2022, and the other by June 30, 2023. In September, the Community Development team briefed the Planning Commission and the City Council on the rules and their requirements related to parking reform. Under the rules, the City has three options for meeting the requirements for parking reform. 1. Remove all minimum parking requirements. 2. Remove minimum parking requirements in certain geographies and for certain uses. 3. Remove minimum parking requirements in certain geographies and adopt parking programs. PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE DCA2022-00005 12/13/2022 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS PAGE 2 OF 7 An analysis by the Community Development team found that Option 2 would require the removal of minimum parking requirements in 62 percent of the city,including all the mixed-use zones, most of the Industrial zones, and all but a small section of the General Commercial zone. The portion of the city where minimum parking requirements could be applied would be almost exclusively residential areas. However, even within these areas, certain minimum parking requirements could not be applied to a variety of housing types. Option 3 would require extensive administrative investment to create and manage ongoing parking reform programs. The Community Development team has confidence that removing minimum parking requirements will have no significant long-term impact on the provision of parking based on the precedents in other communities. Moreover, maintaining minimum parking requirements runs counter to the city's stated vision and goals centered on climate change, health, and walkability. Therefore, the recommendation to Planning Commission and City Council was to pursue Option 1. Planning Commission concurred with a unanimous vote at their November 7 hearing.At a previous briefing, a majority of City Council members also directed staff to develop code amendments to effectuate this option. Summary of Code Changes The code changes associated with this project are minimal. They are focused almost exclusively on excising language related to minimum parking requirements from the development code. There are a few changes in the omnibus that address issues with the mobile home parks chapter and fix an issue in a table. Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading This chapter was updated to remove all standards related to minimum parking requirements. In addition, it was restructured to better organize the standards,and a new purpose statement was written to reflect the updated goals and vision of the chapter and allow for better findings to adjustments to the standards. Division 18.200 Residential Development Standards Division 18.300 Residential Development Standards Division 18.600 Plan Districts The chapters in these divisions were updated to remove references to minimum parking requirements and correct references to Chapter 18.410. Chapter 18.260 was updated to remove requirements that are better handled through nuisance code enforcement or that were not clear and objective. Chapter 18.710 Land Use Applications A table was updated to remove an instance where an ADU application type was erroneously not removed in the previous Housing Compliance project. Chapter 18.765 Modifications This chapter was updated to remove references to modifications for minimum parking requirements. PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE DCA2022-00005 12/13/2022 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS PAGE 3 OF 7 SECTION IV. APPLICABLE CRITERIA, FINDINGS, AND CONCLUSIONS STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS AND GUIDELINES State planning regulations require cities to adopt and amend Comprehensive Plans and land use regulations in compliance with the state land use goals. Because the proposed code amendments have a limited scope and the text amendments address only some of the topics in the Statewide Planning Goals, only applicable statewide goals are addressed below. Statewide Planning Goal 1—Citizen Involvement: This goal outlines the citizen involvement requirement for adoption of Comprehensive Plans and changes to the Comprehensive Plan and implementing documents. FINDING: The Department of Land Conservation and Development conducted a comprehensive public engagement process for the CFEC rulemaking project. This project brings the city's development code into compliance with those administrative rules and the associated state law. Notice was sent to affected government agencies by email on October 5, 2022. The notice requirements set forth in Section 18.710.110 (Type IV Procedures)were met. A notice was published in the Tigard Times newspaper on October 20, 2022. Two public hearings were held one before the Planning Commission on November 7 and one before the City Council on December 13, at which an opportunity for public input is provided. This goal is satisfied. Statewide Planning Goal 2—Land Use Planning: This goal outlines the land use planning process and policy framework. FINDING: The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) has acknowledged the City's Comprehensive Plan as being consistent with the statewide planning goals. The Development Code implements the Comprehensive Plan. The Development Code establishes a process and standards to review changes to the Tigard Development Code in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and other applicable state requirements. As discussed within this report, the applicable Development Code process and standards have been applied to the proposed amendment, and the intent of these amendments are to meet the requirements of state law, administrative rules, and the Statewide Planning Goals. This goal is satisfied. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above and the related findings below, the Planning Commission concludes the proposed code amendments are consistent with applicable Statewide Planning Goals. OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 660 DIVISION 12 The new rules in Section 400 of this division require that"Cities and counties shall remove parking mandates as directed under OAR 660-012-0420. In lieu of removing parking mandates, cities and counties may amend their comprehensive plans and land use regulations to implement the provisions of OAR 660-012-0425, OAR 660- 012-0430, OAR 660-012-0435, OAR 660-012-0440, OAR 660-012-0445, and OAR 660-012-0450" FINDING: The code amendments proposed remove all minimum parking requirements from the City of Tigard's Community Development Code as required by OAR 660-012-0400. This Administrative Rule is satisfied. PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE DCA2022-00005 12/13/2022 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS PAGE 4 OF 7 CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above and the related findings below, the Planning Commission concludes that the proposed code amendments are consistent with the applicable Oregon Administrative Rules. TIGARD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN State planning regulations require cities to adopt and amend comprehensive plans and land use regulations in compliance with the state land use goals and consistent with their adopted comprehensive plan goals and policies. Because the development code amendments have a limited scope and the text amendments address only some of the topics in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan,only applicable comprehensive plan goals and associated policies are addressed below. Comprehensive Plan Goal 1: Citizen Involvement Policy 1.1.2:The City shall define and publicize an appropriate role for citizens in each phase of the land use planning process. FINDING: The Department of Land Conservation and Development conducted a comprehensive public engagement process for the CFEC rulemaking project. This project brings the city's development code into compliance with those administrative rules and the associated state law. Notice was sent to affected government agencies by email on October 5, 2022. The notice requirements set forth in Section 18.710.110 (Type IV Procedures)were met. A notice was published in the Tigard Times newspaper on October 20, 2022. Two public hearings were held one before the Planning Commission on November 7 and one before the City Council on December 13, at which an opportunity for public input is provided. This goal is satisfied. Comprehensive Plan Goal 2: Land Use Planning Policy 2.1.1: The City's land use program shall establish a clear policy direction, comply with state and regional requirements, and serve its citizens' own interests. FINDING: The proposed text amendments to the development code comply with all state and regional requirements, as the previous findings indicate. The proposed amendments provide clarification to ambiguous, redundant, and contradictory language in the development code. The proposed amendments also establish a clear policy direction for the approval of housing types. This policy is satisfied. Comprehensive Plan Goal 2: Land Use Planning Policy 2.1.2:The City's land use regulations,related plans,and implementing actions shall be consistent with and implement its Comprehensive Plan. FINDING: As demonstrated in this staff report, the proposed amendments to the Tigard Development Code are consistent with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. This policy is satisfied. Policy 2.1.3: The City shall coordinate the adoption, amendment, and implementation of its land use program with other potentially affected jurisdictions and agencies. FINDING: Copies of the proposed text amendments were sent to affected agencies and each agency was invited PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE DCA2022-00005 12/13/2022 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS PAGE 5 OF 7 to comment on the proposal, as required by Section 18.710.110 (Type IV Procedures) and discussed in Section V of this report. Comments submitted by affected agencies have been incorporated into this report and the proposed amendments. This policy is satisfied. Policy 2.1.24: The City shall establish design standards to promote quality urban development and to enhance the community's value,livability, and attractiveness. FINDING: The proposed amendments further the City's goal to increase health and walkability. Standards for street-facing facades ensure that the pedestrian realm remains attractive and that parking structures do not present blank walls to the street. The proposed standards ensure that the City's goals and the state requirements are simultaneously met. This policy is satisfied. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above,the Planning Commission concludes that the proposed code text amendments are consistent with applicable provisions of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE Section 18.790: Zoning Map and Text Amendments 18.790.020 Legislative Amendments A.Approval process.A legislative amendment application is processed through a Legislative procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.110. FINDING: The proposed amendments are legislative in nature. Therefore, the amendment will be reviewed under the Type IV legislative procedure as set forth in Section 18.710.110. This procedure requires public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Public hearings were conducted on November 7, 2022, and December 13, 2022. This criterion is met. B. A recommendation or a decision for a legislative amendment application may be based on consideration of the applicable legal requirements. They may, but do not necessarily include: Oregon Revised Statutes, Oregon Administrative Rules, one or more Statewide Planning Goals, Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan and any other regional plans. FINDING:Findings and conclusions are provided throughout Section IV above,for the applicable listed factors on which the recommendation by the Commission and the decision by the Council shall be based. This standard is satisfied. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings above, the Planning Commission concludes that the proposed amendments are consistent with applicable provisions of the Tigard Development Code. SUMMARY CONCLUSION: As shown in the findings above, the Planning Commission concludes that the proposed amendments are consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals; applicable Oregon Administrative Rules; applicable Tigard Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, and the applicable provisions of the City's implementing ordinances. SECTION V. AGENCY COMMENTS PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE DCA2022-00005 12/13/2022 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS PAGE 6 OF 7 City of Portland,City of Beaverton, City of Durham,City of Lake Oswego,City of Tualatin, City of King City, Washington County, TVF&R, METRO, DLCD, DEQ, CWS, and OR Dept. of Aviation were notified of the proposed code text amendments and to date,have not provided any comments. The Department of Land Conservation and Development submitted written comments. Those comments are included in Attachment 2. SECTION VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments have been received to date. ATTACHMENTS: Attachments: 1. Draft Text Amendments 2. Agency Comments ciaWp— November 21, 2022 PREPARED BY: Schuyler Warren DATE Senior Planner November 21,2022 APPROVED BY: Tom McGuire DATE Assistant Community Development Director November 21,2022 APPROVED BY: Yi-Kang Hu DATE Planning Commission President PARKING REFORM COMPLIANCE DCA2022-00005 12/13/2022 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS PAGE 7 OF 7 Parking Compliance Project Strikethrough with Commentary December 13, 2022 Commentary General Notes Text shown in strikcthrough is to be removed. Text shown in bold, italic, and underlined is to be added. Chapter 18.410 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING 18.410.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards to ensure the following goals are met provision of vehicle parking areas that: A. Off-street vehicle parking and maneuvering areas should be: 1 A. Limited in scale, Have adequate capacity, 2 B. Appropriately located to increase safety and minimize conflicts with non-motorized vehicles and pedestrians, Are appropriately located in close proximity to the various uses for residents, customers, and employees, and 3 C. Adequately maintained, an' .•- . •- - . nearby streets to minimize hazardous conditions. 4. Designed in a manner to mitigate heat island effects or generate sustainable power. B. Parking structures should: 1. Include pedestrian-friendly ground floor facades, and 2. Minimize conflicts at ingress and egress points. C. Off-street bicycle parking areas should be: 1. Sufficiently sized to meet the current and future needs of bicyclists, and 2. Located to ensure safety, reduce theft, and increase convenience. 18.410.020 Applicability Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading A new purpose statement was written with the intent of separating out the goals for each of the three different parking situations covered by this chapter.This will help to better explain the purpose of the code, but also allow for better findings for adjustments, which rely on the purpose statement. A. Applicability. The provisions of this chapter apply to all new development and all modifications to existing development, including changes of use, unless stated otherwise. B. _Unlisted uses. Where a use in not listed in Table 18.410.3, a use determination may be requested as provided in Section 18.60.030 for the purposes of determining the maximum vehicle parkins and minimum bicycle parking standards of this chapter. A I I I . . . . • • . A. Location. Required off street parking must be located on the same lot as the use it serves, except where an on street credit has been granted through the provisions of Section 18.4 10.090. B. Maintenance. All parking areas must be kept clean and in good repair at all times. C. Exclusive use. Except for shared parking agreements approved through a land any other person or organization. D. Mixed use and multi tenant developments. In mixed use and multi tenant developments, the required minimum vehicle parking is determined using the following formula: 1. The use category with the largest proportion of total floor area within the development must provide 100 percent of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use category in Section 18.410.070; 2. The use category with the second largest proportion of total floor area within the development must provide 85 percent of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use category in Section 18.410.070; 3. The use category with the third largest proportion of total floor area within the development must provide 70 percent of the minimum vehicle parking required for that use category in Section 18.410.070; �I. All other use categories must provide 60 percent of the minimum vehicle parking required for each of those use categories in Section 18/110.070. Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading The language on unlisted uses was moved to this section from later in the code. Most of the general provisions were removed, as they apply to situations where there are minimum parking requirements. The provisions that were not removed were moved to other sections where they could be better applied. Maintenance in particular does not need to be here as it is covered by the nuisance code. E. Shared parking. The parking requirements of this chapter may be met through a shared parking agreement, subject to the following: 1. The applicant must demonstrate that the sites participating in the shared uses on the sites during all periods of operation; 2. The applicant must provide satisfactory legal evidence in the form of deeds, leases, or contracts to establish the shared parking agreement; and 3. If a shared parking agreement is terminated, the requirements of this title thereafter apply to each use, structure, or lot separately. F. Accessible parking. All parking areas must include the required number of accessible parking spaces as specified by the state building code and federal standards. Such parking spaces must be sized, signed, and marked as required by these regulations and in compliance with ORS 447. G. Fleet parking. Required vehicle parking spaces may not be used for storage of fleet vehicles, except when a use can show that employee and fleet parking spaces are used interchangeably; for example, the employee drives the fleet vehicle from home, or the spaces are used for fleet storage only at night and are available for employee use during the day. For the purposes of this title, space exclusively devoted to the storage of fleet vehicles will be considered as outdoor storage. 18.410.040030 Vehicle Parking and Loading Standards A. Quantity. 1. The ratios for the maximum number of off-street vehicle parking spaces allowed are provided in Table 18.410.3, subject to the following: a. If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than six parking spaces for a development with less than 1,000 square feet of floor area, the development is allowed up to six parking spaces. b. If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than 10 vehicle parking spaces for a development between 1,000 and Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading The accessible parking provisions were moved to the vehicle parking and loading section. The quantity section was added here to mirror the way that the bicycle section is organized. 2,000 square feet, the development is allowed up to 10 vehicle parking spaces. c. If a development is approved with no specified use, the development must apply the maximum parking standard for the use category that would allow the fewest number of parking spaces, chosen from all the uses that could be contained within the building type(s). d. In mixed-use and multi-tenant developments, the maximum allowable vehicle parking is determined individually for each use. d. The following types of parking areas are not included when calculating the maximum number of vehicle parking spaces allowed: 1. Parking spaces contained in a parking structure; 2. Market-rate paid parking spaces; 3. Designated carpool or vanpool spaces; 4. Designated accessible parking spaces; 5. Fleet vehicle storage; and 6. Vehicle storage spaces for sale, lease, or rent. B. A. Vehicular access. Vehicular access to off-street vehicle parking or loading areas must meet the requirements of Chapter 18.920, Access, Egress, and Circulation and Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas. Com. Pedestrian access. Paths that cross access driveways or that provide access to vehicle or bicycle parking areas are subject to the following: 1. Paths must be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking and maneuvering areas by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are allowed for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used; 2. Paths must be a minimum of 4 feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts; and Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading 3. Paths must be in compliance with applicable federal and state accessibility standards. C. Loading and unloading driveway. Passenger loading and unloading areas must be designed such that vehicle stacking does not impact any public right of way. D. Drive-through facilities. 1. All uses with drive-through facilities must provide an-on-site stacking lanes for inbound vehicles as provided in Table 18.410.1. Table 18.410.1 Stacking Lane Requirements Use Stacking Lane Requirement Banks 150 feet/service terminal Automated teller machines 50 feet/automated teller machine Cleaners,repair services 50 feet Restaurants 200 feet Drive-in theaters 200 feet Fueling stations 75 feet between curb cut and nearest fueling kiosk Car washes 75 feet/washing unit Parking facilities: - With automatic ticket dispensing 50 feet/entry driveway -With staffed ticket dispensing 100 feet/entry driveway - With valet or attendant parking 100 feet 2. Stacking lanes must be designed so that they do not interfere with street parking areas or with vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation. Restaurants with drive through facilities must provide at least one clearly order to be filled. E. Surfacing. Off-street parking areas must be paved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface, except for with the following exceptions: Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading The loading driveways provision was combined with another and moved to later in this section This is a minimum parking requirement and so it was removed. 1. Off-street parking areas associated with a temporary use application, as provided in Chapter 18.440, Temporary Uses, provided the approval authority determines that unpaved parking will not create adverse conditions. 2. Off-street overflow parking areas in the Parks and Recreation zone. F. Striping. 1. Except for parking required for small form residential and accessory dwelling units, and individual spaces for rowhouses, all All off-street parking spaces must be clearly and separately identified with pavement markings or contrasting paving materials; and, except for spaces provided with the followinji types of development: a. Small form residential; b. Detached accessory dwelling units; or c. Any other residential development where spaces are not grouped 2. All interior vehicle drives and access aisles must be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow. G. Wheel stops. Parking bumpers or wheel stops a minimum of four inches in height must be provided a minimum of three feet from the front of vehicle parking spaces wherever vehicles can encroach on a right-of-way or pedestrian path. Curbing may substitute for wheel stops if vehicles will not encroach into the minimum required width for landscape or pedestrian paths. H. Lighting. Lighting in parking areas must be provided that meets the following standards: 1. Parking areas must include lighting sufficient to illuminate aAll pedestrian paths and bicycle parking areas in parkinji areas and providinji access to parking areas must be illuminbated to a minimum level of 0.5 footcandles at all points, measured horizontally at the ground level. 2. Lighting luminaires must have a cutoff angle of 90 degrees or greater to ensure that lighting is directed toward the parking surface. 3. Parking area 1Lighting may not cause a light trespass of more than 0.5 footcandles measured vertically at the boundaries of the site. Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading This standard was reworded for clarity. The lighting provisions were made specific to vehicle parking areas and new lighting provisions were added to the bicycle parking stardards. I. Space and aisle dimensions. The minimum dimensional standards for surface parking spaces and drive aisles are provided in Figure 18.410.1 and Table 18.410.2. Figure 18.410.1 Parking Dimension Factors II 1Y Parking angle OA, /Stall width(1335,4, Aisle(D) Stall depth Parkini\ perpendicular space or N. toe(E)\ stall 1-41-1P-1 Curb length (C) Table 18.410.2 Minimum Parking Space and Aisle Dimensions Stall Width Curb Length 1 Way Aisle 2 Way Aisle Angle (A) (B) (C) Width (D) Width(D) Stall Depth (E) 0° (Parallel) 8 ft. 22 ft. 6 in. 12 ft. 20 ft. 8 ft. 30° 8 ft. 6 in. 17 ft. 12 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. 45° 8 ft. 6 in. 12 ft. 12 ft. 20 ft. 17 ft. 60° 8 ft. 6 in. 9 ft. 9 in. 16 ft. 20 ft. 17 ft. 6 in. 90° 8 ft. 6 in. 8 ft. 6 in. 20 ft. 20 ft. 16 ft. J. Accessible parking Where off-street vehicle parking is provided, it must include the required number 2f accessible vehicle parking spaces as specified by the state building code and federal standards. Such parking spaces must be sized, signed, and marked as required by these regulations and in compliance with ORS 447. Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading This provision was moved from the general provisions. K. Loading areas. All off-street vehicle loading areas for passengers or goods must: 1. Include sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length must be at least twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the site. 2. Be designed such that vehicle stacking does not impact any public right- of-way. 18.410.040 Parking Structure Standards A. First-story windows and wall openings. All street facing facades of parking structures must include windows, doors, or display areas on a minimum of 20% of the first-story facade area excluding those portions of the facade devoted to vehicular access, stairwells, elevators, and centralized payment booths. Required windows must have a sill no more than four feet above grade. Where the interior oor level ,rohibits such ,lacement the sill ma be raised to allow it to be no more than two feet above finished floor wall up to a maximum sill height of six feet above grade. B. _Exit warning bell. All exits from parking structures within 15 feet ofpublic sidewalks or pedestrian paths must include an audible and visible signal that alerts non-motorized traffic when vehicles are exiting. C. Parking layout and internal circulation. The required space and aisle dimensions within a parking structure are provided in Figure 18.410.1 and Table 18.410.2. 18.410.050 Bicycle Parking DesignStandards A. Quantity. The minimum number of required bicycle parking spaces is provided in Table 18.410.3. If application of the minimum bicycle parking standard results in less than two spaces, then the development must provide at least two spaces. Small orm residential accesso dwellin, units cotta,e clusters cour and units ,uads and rowhouses are exempt from minimum bicycle parking standards. BA. Location. Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading This subsection combines two separate loading area standards into one. This section was moved to be next to the vehicle parking standards that it references. The quantity standard was moved to the beginning of this section. 4, Required bicycle parking must be located within 50 feet of a required or main entrance of a primary building; and, except that required bicycle parking for mixed-use or nonresidential development that includes any vehicle parking within a parking structure must be covered and located within 100 feet of a required or main entrance of a primary building oche site if any required vehicle parking spaces are provided in a structure. CB. Design. 1. Bicycle racks must be designed to allow a bicycle frame to lock to it at two points of contact, except that spiral racks and wave racks with more than one loop are prohibited; 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall, or other structure; 3. Bicycle parking spaces must be at least 2.5 feet in width and six feet in length and have an access Vie-between each row of spaces that is at least five feet in width. Covered bicycle parking must provide a vertical clearance of seven feet; and 4. Bicycle parking spaces must be paved with a dust-free hard surface material. C. Q .ty. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is provided in Table 18.410.3. If the minimum bicycle parking requirement as calculated in Table 18.410.3 is less than two spaces, then the minimum number of spaces is two. Small form residential, accessory dwelling units, cottage clusters, courtyard units, quads, and rowhouses are exempt from minimum bicycle parking standards. D. Lighting. Lighting must be provided that meets the following standards: 1. All bicycle parking areas and paths providing access to these areas must be illuminated to a minimum level of 0.5 footcandles at all points, measured horizontally at the ground level. 2. Lighting luminaires must have a cutoff angle of 90 degrees or greater to ensure that lighting is directed toward the parking surface. 3. Lighting may not cause a light trespass of more than 0.5 footcandles measured vertically at the boundaries of the site. Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Reworded for clarity. These lighting standards for bicycle parking were moved from the vehicle parking area standards. • . AI I . I 0 - • I • • - • . . .• . . . • . . . . . . . . . . • . A. First story windows and wall openings. All street facing facades must include windows, doors, or display areas on a minimum of 20% of the first story facade area excluding those portions of the facade devoted to vehicular access, stairwells, elevators, and centralized payment booths. Required windows must have a sill no more than four feet above grade. Where the interior floor level prohibits such placement, the sill may be raised to allow it to be no more than two feet above finished floor wall up to a maximum sill height of six feet above grade. B. Exit warning bell. A warning bell or other signal must be provided for exits from parking structures that cross public sidewalks where a standard vision clearance area cannot be provided. C. Parking layout and internal circulation. The required space and aisle dimensions within a parking structure are provided in Figure 18.410.1 and Table 18.410.2. 18.410.070060 Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Quantity Standards A. Off street parking requirements. The ratios for providing minimum and maximum vehicle parking spaces are provided in Table 18.410.3. If application of the : . : - -- - - - . . parking spaces. If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than 10 vehicle parking spaces for a development between 1,000 and 2,000 square feet, the development is allowed up to 10 vehicle parking spaces. B. Choice of parking requirements. When a development is approved with no specified use, the use category for determining the minimum and maximum parking requirements is the use category that requires the greatest number of parking spaces, chosen from all uses that could be contained within the building type. C. Measurements. The following measurements are used in calculating the total minimum number of vehicle parking spaces required as provided in Table 18.110.3: Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading This section was moved earlier. Most of the requirements of this section were removed as most relate to minimum parking requirements. This was made specific to maximum parking and moved to the vehicle parking standards quantity subsection 1. Fractions. Fractional space requirements are counted as a whole space. 2. Employees. Where employees are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the employees counted are those 3. Students. When students are specified for the purpose of determining the minimum vehicle parking spaces required, the students counted are those who are on the campus during the peak period of the day during a typical school term. 1. Space. Square footage is floor area, excluding only space devoted to covered off street parking or loading. D. Exceptions to maximum parking standards. The following types of parking are not included when calculating the maximum vehicle parking allowed as provided in Table 18.410.3: 1. Parking spaces contained in a parking structure; 2. Market rate paid parking spaces; 3. Designated carpool or vanpool spaces; /1. Designated accessible parking spaces; 5. Fleet vehicle storage; and 6. Vehicle storage spaces for sale, lease, or rent. E. Parking requirements for unlisted uses. If a use is not listed, a use determination may be requested as provided in Section 18.60.030. • i . . • . . . . . . . I . . • - . . • . • All off street loading spaces must have sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length may not be less than twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the site. Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading This subsection was moved to the quantity subsection of the vehicle parking standards. This was combined with another loading standard in the vehicle parking section. . . A. Applicability. The following uses may partially or fully meet off street parking requirements using the on street parking standards of this section: 1. Residential uses in the RES B, RES C, and RES D zones; and 2. Religious Institutions. B. Credit. Each on street parking space may substitute for one required off street parking space. C. Standards. An on street parking space utilized for this credit must meet the following standards: 1. On street parking must be allowed on the side of the street where the space is to be provided. 2. The space must be a minimum of 24 feet long; 3. The space must be located along an improved and curbed right of way; '1. The space must be located adjacent to the subject site; 5. The space must not extend into the required vision clearance area as defined in Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas, and must not violate any other applicable street standard as determined by the City Engineer; and 6. If the use is a Religious Institution, local residential streets may not be utilized for on street parking credit. D. No exclusive use. On street parking spaces credited for a specific development or use may not be used exclusively by that development or use but must be available for the general public. Signs or actions limiting general public use of on street spaces are prohibited. Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading On-street parking credits are no longer needed, as there are no minimum parking requirements. Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bic cle Parkin, I uanti Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Maximum Maximum Bicycle Use Category Minimum (Zone A) [1 J (Zone B) 111 Residential Use Category Residential Use See applicable housing type development standards chapter in 18.200. The residential component of a mixed-use development must use the parking requirements for apartments. Civic/Institutional Use Categories Basic Utilities None None None Colleges 1.0/3.3 1.0/3.3 1.0/3.0 students/staff students/staff students/staff Community Services 2.5/1,000 4.0/1,000 0.3/1,000 Cultural Institutions 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 1.0/1,000 Day Care Home:None Home:None Home:None Commercial: Commercial: Commercial: 2.7/1,000 3.2/1,000 1.5/classroom Emergency Services 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.5/1,000 Medical Centers 2.7/1,000 3.2/1,000 0.2/1,000 Postal Services 3.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Religious Institutions 1.0/1.7 seats in 1.0/1.3 seats in 1.0/20 seats in main assembly main assembly main assembly area area area Schools Preschool: Preschool: Preschool: 7.0+ 0.0 + 1.0/classroom 1.0/classroom 1.0/classroom Elementary/JR: 6.0/classroom Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading The quantity standards table was updated to remove minimum parking requirements. Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bic cle Parkin! I uanti Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Maximum Maximum Bicycle Use Category Minimum (Zone A) 111 (Zone B) [1] Elementary/JR: Elementary/JR: SR: 2.5/classroom 3.5/classroom 6.0/classroom SR: 1.0/3.3 SR: 1.0/3.3 students/staff students/staff Social/Fraternal 12.0/1,000 14.0/1,000 2.0/1,000 main Clubs/Lodges main assembly main assembly assembly area area area Temporary Shelter None None 1.0/5 beds Commercial Use Categories Adult Entertainment 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.5/1,000 1.0/1.25 seats 1.0/2 seats 1.0/20 seats Animal-Related 4.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Commercial Bulk Sales 1.3/1,000 2.0/1,000 0.3/1,000 Commercial Lodging 1.2/room 1.4/room ,1.0/10 rooms Custom Arts and Crafts 5.1/1,000 6.2/1,000 0.3/1,000 Eating and Drinking Fast food: Fast food: All: 1.0/1,000 Establishments[2/ 12.4/1,000 14.9/1,000 Other: Other: 19.1/1,000 23.0/1,000 Indoor Entertainment 5.4/1,000 6.5/1,000 0.5/1,000 Theater: Theater: 1.0/2 Theater: 1.0/10 1.0/2.5 seats seats seats Major Event 1.0/2.5 seats or 1.0/2 seats or 1.0/10 seats Entertainment Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bic cle Parkin! I uanti Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Maximum Maximum Bicycle Use Category Minimum (Zone A) all (Zone B) /11 1.0/5 ft of 1.0/4 ft of or 40 ft of bench bench bench Motor Vehicle 1.3/1,000 but 2.0/1,000 but 0.2/1,000 sales Sales/Rental no less than 4 no less than 4 area Motor Vehicle 2.3/1,000 but 2.6/1,000 but 0.2/1,000 Servicing/Repair no less than 4 no less than 4 Non Accessory Parking None None None Office Non-medical: Non-medical: Non-medical: 3.4/1,000 4.1/1,000 0.5/1,000 Medical: Medical: Medical: 4.9/1,000 5.9/1,000 0.4/1,000 Outdoor Entertainment 4.5/1,000 5.0/1,000 0.4/1,000 Outdoor Sales 1.3/1,000 sales 2.0/1,000 sales 0.1/1,000 sales area area area Personal Services 3.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 All: 1.0/1,000 Bank with Bank with _ drive-through: drive-through: 5.4/1,000 6.5/1,000 Repair-Oriented Retail 4.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Sales-Oriented Retail 5.1/1,000 6.2/1,000 0.3/1,000 Self-Service Storage 1.0/4 storage 1.0/2 storage 1.0/40 storage units units units Vehicle Fuel Sales 4.0+ 4.0 + 0.2/1,000 2.0/service bay 2.5/service bay Industrial Use Categories General Industrial None None 0.1/1,000 Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bic cle Parkin! I uanti Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Maximum Maximum Bicycle Use Category Minimum (Zone A) Ill (Zone B) /1/ Heavy Industrial None None 0.1/1,000 Industrial Services 1.2/1,000 1.8/1,000 0.1/1,000 Light Industrial None None 0.1/1,000 Railroad Yards None None None Research and 3.0/1,000 3.8/1,000 0.5/1,000 Development Warehouse/Freight <150,000 sq ft: <150,000 sq ft: All: 0.1/1,000 Movement 0.8/1,000 1.2/1,000 >150,000 sq ft: >150,000 sq ft: 0.4/1,000 0.5/1,000 Waste-Related 7.0 10.0 None Wholesale Sales 1.2/1,000 1.8/1,000 0.1/1,000 Other Use Categories Agriculture/Horticulture None None None Cemeteries None None None Detention Facilities None None 1.0/2.5 beds Heliports None None None Mining None None None Wireless None None None Communication Facilities Transportation/Utility None None None Corridors Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Table 18.410.3 : 1 . .. . . . �e Vehiele Vehicle Maximum Maximum Use-Gate-gory Bieyele-Minimum (Zone A) Ill (-Zone-B)-1-1-1- •• • • ZoneB) 1" See applicable housing type development standards chapter in 18.200. Residential Use The residential component of a mixed use development must use the parking requirements for apartments. Basic Utilities None None None None Colleges 4,04 1.0/3.3 1.0/3.3 1.0/3.0 students/staff students/staff students/staff students/staff Community Services 2.0/1,000 2.5/1,000 /1.0/1,000 0.3/1,000 Cultural Institutions 2.5/1,000 3.5/1,000 /1.5/1,000 1.0/1,000 Day Care Home: None Home: None Home: None Home: None Commercial: Commercial: Commercial: Commercial: 2.0/classroom 2.7/1,000 3.2/1,000 1.5/classroom Emergency Services 3.0/1,000 3.5/1,000 1.5/1,000 0.5/1,000 Medical Centers 2.0/1,000 2.7/1,000 3.2/1,000 0.2/1,000 Postal Services 2.5/1,000 3.0/1,000 1.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Religious Institutions 1.0/3 scats in 1.0/1.7 scats in 1.0/1.3 scats in 1.0/20 seats in main main assembly main assembly main assembly assembly arca arca area arca Schools Preschool: Preschool: Preschool: Preschool: 5.0 + 7.0 + 0.0 + 1.0/classroom 1.0/classroom 1.0/classroom 1.0/classroom Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Table 18.410.3 . • 1 • . .. . . „ ! 1 . . Vehicle Vehicle ale Mff*imum Max-Maim (Zone A) Ill Elementary/JR: Elementary/JR: Elementary/JR: Elementary/JR: 2.0/classroom 2.5/classroom 3.5/classroom 6.0/classroom SR: 1.0/5 SR: 1.0/3.3 SR: 1.0/3.3 SR: 6.0/classroom students/staff students/staff students/staff Social/Fraternal 10.0/1,000 12.0/1,000 14.0/1,000 main 2.0/1,000 main Clubs/Lodges main assembly main assembly assembly arca assembly arca arca arca Temporary Shelter 1.0/2.5 beds None None 1.0/5 beds Adult Entertainment 2.5/1,000 3.5/1,000 /1.5/1,000 0.5/1,000 1.0/3 seats 1.0/1.25 seats 1.0/2 scats 1.0/20 seats Animal Related 3.3/1,000 /1.0/1,000 /1.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Commercial Bulk Sales 1.0/1,000 but 1.3/1,000 2.0/1,000 0.3/1,000 no less than 10 Commercial Lodging 1.0/room 1.2/room 1.4/room 1.0/10 rooms Custom Arts and Crafts 3.0/1,000 5.1/1,000 6.2/1,000 0.3/1,000 Eating and Drinking Fast food: Fast food: Fast food: All: 1.0/1,000 Establishments [2] 7.0/1,000 2,4/1,000 14.9/1,000 Other: Other: Other: 9.0/1,000 19.1/1,000 23.0/1,000 Indoor Entertainment /1.3/1,000 5A/1,000 6.5/1,000 0.5/1,000 Theater: 1.0/3 Theater: 1.0/2.5 Theater: 1.0/2 Theater: 1.0/10 seats seats seats seats Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Table 18.410.3 ' . .. . i . • 1 • . .. . . „ ! 1 . . Vehicle Vehicle ale (Zone A) Ill Major Event 1.0/3 scats or 1.0/2.5 scats or 1.0/2 scats or 1.0/10 seats Entertainment 1.0/6 ft of 1.0/5 ft of 1.0/4 ft of bench or 40 ft of bench bench bench Motor Vehicle 1.0/1,000 but 1.3/1,000 but 2.0/1,000 but no 0.2/1,000 sales Sales/Rental no less than 'I no less than 'I less than 1 area Motor Vehicle 2.0/1,000 but 2.3/1,000 but 2.6/1,000 but no 0.2/1,000 Servicing/Repair no less than 1 no less than 1 less than 1• Non Accessory Parking None None None None Office Non medical: Non medical: Non medical: Non medical: 2.7/1,000 3.4/1,000 1.1/1,000 0.5/1,000 Medical: Medical: Medical: Medical: 0.4/1,000 3.9/1,000 '1.9/1,000 5.9/1,000 Outdoor Entertainment 1.0/1,000 '1.5/1,000 5.0/1,000 0.4/1,000 Outdoor Sales 1.0/1,000 sales 1.3/1,000 sales 2.0/1,000 sales 0.1/1,000 sales arca area area arca Personal Services 2.5/1,000 3.0/1,000 '1.5/1,000 All: 1.0/1,000 Bank with Bank with Bank with - drive through: drive through: drive through: 3.0/1,000 5.4/1,000 6.5/1,000 Repair Oriented Retail 3.3/1,000 '1.0/1,000 '1.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Sales Oriented Retail 3.0/1,000 5.1/1,000 6.2/1,000 0.3/1,000 Self Service Storage 1.0/4 storage 1.0/4 storage 1.0/2 storage 1.0/40 storage units units units units Vehicle Fuel Sales 3 '1.0 + '1.0 +2.5/service 0.2/1,000 2.0/service bay 2.0/service bay bay Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Table 18.410.3 . • 1 • . .. . . „ ! 1 . . Vehicle Vehicle ale Maximum Maximum (Zone A) Ill (Zone u) r" General Industrial 1.6/1,000 None None 0.1/1,000 Heavy Industrial 1.6/1,000 None None 0.1/1,000 Industrial Services 0.8/1,000 1.2/1,000 1.8/1,000 0.1/1,000 Light Industrial 1.6/1,000 None None 0.1/1,000 Railroad Yards None None None None Research and 2.0/1,000 3.0/1,000 3.8/1,000 0.5/1,000 Development Warehouse/Freight <150,000 sq ft: <150,000 sq ft: <150,000 sq ft: All: 0.1/1,000 Movement 0.5/1,000 0.8/1,000 1.2/1,000 >150,000 sq ft: >150,000 sq ft: >150,000 sq ft: 0.3/1,000 0.4/1,000 0.5/1,000 Waste Related 5.0 779 4079 None Wholesale Sales 0.8/1,000 1.2/1,000 1.8/1,000 0.1/1,000 Other Usc Categories - - - - Agriculture/Horticulture 2.5/1,000 sales None None None area but no less than 'I Cemeteries None None None None Detention Facilities 1.0/2.5 beds Nonc None 1.0/2.5 beds Heliports None Nonc None None Mining 4-570 Nonc None None Wireless None Nonc None None Communication Facilities Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Table 18.410.3 • •• • . . • • 1 • . .. . . . . „ 1 . . • 1 . .. . . . 1 I Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Maximum Maximum (Zone A) Ill (Zone B) r" Transportation/Utility None None None None Corridors [1] Maximum parking ratios are in compliance with the Metro Regional Transportation Functional Plan. Zone A standards apply where 20-minute peak hour transit service is available within 0.25 miles walking distance for bus transit or 0.5 miles walking distance for high-capacity transit. Zone B standards apply to areas not in Zone A. The Director maintains a map that shows the locations of Zones A and B. [2] Fast food designation includes all eating and drinking establishments with a "walk-up counter" or less than 10 tables in the dining area. ■ Commentary Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Omnibus Amendments 18.30.010 List of Terms -c- Caliper- See Tree-Related Definitions Carport Certified Arborist - See Tree-Related Definitions Change of Use City Collocation - See Wireless Communication Facility-Related Definitions Column Common Wall Complex Conditional Use Corner Lot - See Lot-Related Definitions Cornice Council Covered Parking Critical Facility - See Flood-Related Definitions Cottage Cluster- See Dwelling-Related Definitions Courtyard Units - See Dwelling-Related Definitions Covered Soil Volume - See Tree-Related Definitions Cul-de-Sac Commentary Omnibus Carport is added to the list of terms. Covered parking is added to the list of terms. Cultural Institution Auxiliary Sign - See Chapter 18.435, Signs Cutout - See Chapter 18.435, Signs -P- Painted Wall Decorations - See Chapter 18.435, Signs Painted Wall Highlights - See Chapter 18.435, Signs Painted Wall Sign - See Chapter 18.435, Signs Parapet Park Parking Lot Parking Lot Tree - See Tree-Related Definitions Parking Space Parking Structure Partition Party Path - See Transportation-Related Definitions Perimeter Person Pilaster Planning Commission Plat Premises - See Chapter 18.435, Signs Primary Use Commentary Omnibus Parking lot is added to the list of terms. Parking structure is added to the list of terms. Projecting Sign - See Chapter 18.435, Signs Provider- See Wireless Communication Facility-Related Definitions Public Infrastructure - See Wireless Communication Facility-Related Definitions Public Support Facilities 18.30.020 Definitions C. "C" definitions. 1. "Carport"-A single-story building, or portion thereof, that contains one or more parking spaces for the storage of vehicles or bicycles. A carport does not contain parking aisles for internal maneuvering and circulation and may be partially enclosed. 2 4. "Change of use" - Any use that differs from the previous use as provided in Chapter 18.60, Use Categories. 3 2. "City" - The area within the territorial limits of the City of Tigard, Oregon. 4 3. "Column" - In structures, a relatively long, slender structural compression member such as a post, pillar, or strut; usually vertical, supporting a load that acts in (or near) the direction of its longitudinal axis. 5 4. "Common wall" - A wall or joined walls that share a boundary to provide separation of interior spaces. 66. "Complex" - A structure or group of structures developed on one or more contiguous units of land and developed as part of an overall development plan. 76. "Conditional use" - A use that may be allowed by the approval authority following a public hearing, upon findings by the authority that the approval criteria have been met or will be met upon satisfaction of conditions of approval. 8 7. "Cornice" - Decorative projection or crown along the top of a wall or roof. 9 8. "Council" - The City Council of Tigard, Oregon. 10. "Covered parking"- A single-story building that contains multiple parking spaces for the storage of vehicles or bicycles, or a multi-story building that partially or completely covers one or more parking spaces with Commentary Omnibus The code did not previously have a definition for a carport. The code did not previously have a definition for covered parking.This definition is intended to provide a distinction between carports and covered parking. the horizontal extension of the second story beyond the vertical walls of the first story. A covered parking area may contain parking aisles for internal maneuvering and circulation and may be partially enclosed. 11 9. "Cul-de-sac" - The circular turnaround at the end of a dead-end street. G. "G" definitions. 1. "Garage" - A fully-enclosed building1 or portion thereof, that contains one or more parking spaces for the storage, repair, or keeping of a motor vehicles or bicycles. A garage does not contain any parking aisles for internal maneuvering or circulation. P. "P" definitions. 1. "Parapet" - A low, solid, protective screening or decorative wall as an extension of exterior building walls beyond the roof or deck level. 2. "Park" - Any unit of land set apart and devoted to the purposes of pleasure, recreation, ornament, light, and air for the general public. 3. "Parking lot"-An uncovered paved area that includes multiple parking spaces and parking aisles for internal maneuvering and circulation. 43. "Parking space" - A clearly defined area used to store a single vehicle or bicycle that meets the minimum standards of this Title. An area within a private or public parking area, building, or structure for the parking of one vehicle. 5. "Parking structure" -A single- or multi-story building, or portion thereof, that contains multiple parking spaces for the storage of vehicles or bicycles. A parking structure contains parking aisles for internal maneuvering and circulation. 6 4. "Partition" - Division of a unit of land into two or three lots or tracts within a calendar year when such area of land exists as a unit or contiguous units of land under common ownership. Partitioning land does not include: a. Divisions of land resulting from lien foreclosures, foreclosures of recorded contracts for the sale of real property, or creation of cemetery lots; b. Any adjustment of a lot line by the relocation of a common boundary where an additional lot is not created and where the existing lot, reduced in size by the adjustment, is not reduced below the minimum lot size established by an applicable zoning ordinance; or Commentary Omnibus The garage definition was updated to clarify that they do not include circulation areas. The code did not previously have a definition for a parking lot. This one makes it clear that a parking lot has both spaces and maneuvering aisles. The parking space definition was updated to align with its use in other definitions and the rest of the code. The code did not previously have a definition for parking structures, and this created some confusion about the distinction between garages, carports, and other parking structures. c. The sale of a lot in a recorded subdivision, even though the lot may have been acquired prior to the sale with other contiguous lots or property by single owner. 76. "Party" - A person who makes an appearance in a proceeding through the submission of either written or verbal evidence. 8 6. "Perimeter" - The boundaries or borders of a unit of land. 9 7. "Person" - An individual, corporation, governmental agency, official advisory committee of the city, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, or two or more people having a joint or common interest or any other legal entity. 10 8. "Pilaster" - An ornamental or functional column or pillar incorporated into a wall. 11 9. "Planning Commission" - The Planning Commission of the City of Tigard, Oregon. 12 #. "Plat" - A final map, diagram, or other writing containing all the descriptions, specifications, and provisions concerning a land division. 1314. "Primary use" - A primary use is the activity, or combination of activities of chief importance on the site, and the main purposes for which the land or structures are intended, designed, or ordinarily used. Development may have more than one primary use. 14 . "Public support facilities" - Services that are necessary to support uses allowed in the base zone and involve only minor structures such as underground utilities and construction of improvements including sidewalks, curbs, streetlights, and driveway aprons, power lines and poles, phone booths, fire hydrants, as well as bus stops, benches, and mailboxes that are necessary to support principal development. 18.140.050 Development Standards J. Parking. Development must comply with Chapter , Off-Street Parking and Loading., - -- _ _ - _ : 1. Minimum parking requirements only apply to conditional uses in this zone. 2. Dog parks must meet the following requirements: Commentary Omnibus Requirements related to minimum parking requirements were removed. provide a minimum of 5 off street vehicle parking spaces, and a parking plan b. Dog parks or off leash areas with a fenced area of lees than 1 acre must provide a minimum of 3 off street vehicle parking spaces, and a parking plan exempt from minimum parking requirements. 18.230.040 Development Standards E Pedestrian access. 1. Paths must provide pedestrian access from public sidewalks abutting the site to all required building entrances on the site. 2. Paths must provide pedestrian access between all common open space areas, vehicle and bicycle parking areas, building entrances, and service areas designed for use by residents. Paths within parking areas or along drive aisles are subject to additional standards in Chapter 18.410, Off-Street Parking and LoadingSubsection 18.410.040.8. F. Vehicle and bicycle parking. 1. The applicable provisions and standards of Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Sections 18.410.010 through 18.410.060 apply to apartment developments. 2. Thc standards in Scctions 18.410.070 through 18.410.090 do not apply to apartment developments. 3. Thc minimum and maximum numbcr of off street vehicle and bicycle parking spaces arc provided in Table 18.230.2. Any fractional space requirement is roundcd up to the next whole numbcr. Table-1-8,240,2- Commentary Omnibus This reference was simplified. This reference was simplified. This table was removed as most of it related to minimum parking requirements. The bicycle parking requirements were moved to a text section. Vehicle Apartment Vehiele-M-inimum Maximum e 500 sq ft or 1 space per dwelling unit less 1 bedroom 1 space per dwelling unit Nono 1 space per 2 dwelling 2 bedroom 1.25 spaces per dwelling units unit 3 bedroom 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit d. Apartment developments with 10 or more required vehicle parking spaces must also provide additional vehicle parking for guests. The minimum amount of provided in Table 18.230.2. Guest vehicle parking must be clearly identified with pavement markings or signs. 5. Apartment developments with 20 or more dwelling units must also provide additional bicycle parking spaces for guests. The minimum amount of additional Table 18.230.2. Guest bicycle parking must be located within 20 feet of the street property line and be visible to pedestrians from the public sidewalk in front of the site. Bicycle parking may be located in the public right of way with approval of the City Engineer. 6. Apartment developments with 20 or more dwelling units must provide all Required bicycle parking is exempt from the location standard of Subsection 18.410.050.A but may not be located inside individual dwelling units. 27. Off-street Ssurface vehicle parking areas, detached garages, and attached or detached carports may not be located closer to a street property line than the building closest to that street property line. 3 8. Off-street vehicle PQarking areas may not occupy more than 50% of the total length of each street frontage as measured 20 feet from the street property line. Drive aisles without adjacent parking spaces do not count as parking areas for the purposes of this standard. 4 9. Attached garages may be attached to any side of an apartment building. If attached to the street-facing facade, they may not be located closer to the street property line than the apartment building facade and the facade must include at Commentary Omnibus These standards were combined with the quantity standard from the table and moved to later in this section. least one entrance for each proposed garage that meets the standards of Subsection 18.230.050.A. Driveways associated with attached garages that take direct individual access from a public or private street must meet the rowhouse location and access standards in Paragraph 18.280.050.E.3 and Subparagraph 18.280.050.E.2.a. 5. A minimum of one bicycle parking space must be provided for every 2 dwelling units. Fractional parking space minima are rounded up to the nearest whole number. Apartment developments with 20 or more dwelling units must meet the following additional standards: a. All bicycle parking required by Paragraph 18.230.040.F.5 above must be provided inside a structure or under a roof. This bicycle parking is exempt from the location standards of Chapter 18.410, Off Street Parking and Loading, but may not be located inside individual dwelling units. b. Additional bicycle parking must be provided that is equal to or greater than 15% of the minimum parking requirement as provided in Paragraph 18.230.040.F.5 above. This additional bicycle parking must be provided within 20 feet of the street property line and be visible to pedestrians from the public sidewalk in front of the site. Bicycle parking may be located in the public right-of-way with approval of the City Engineer. H. Lighting. 1. Minimum illumination levels are measured horizontally at ground level. a. The minimum average illumination is 1.5 footcandles for paths, except those within parking areas, which are subject to the lighting standards in Chapter 18.410, Off-Street Parking and LoadingSubsection 18.410.040.1. All points of measurement must be a minimum of 0.5 footcandles. 18.240.050 Clear and Objective Standards G. Parking. The provisions and standards of Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Sccti„ns 18 n 1 n 030 and 18.410.040 apply, cxccpt for Subccction 18.410.040.E. The following additional standards also apply: 1. Number of spaces. a. A minimum of one off street parking spacc must be provided for each cottage. If the lot is within 2,500 feet of a right of way that includes transit Commentary Omnibus The quantity standard was moved from the earlier table that was deleted. These standards were moved from earlier. This reference was simplified. This reference was simplified. Minimum parking requirements are removed. minima are rounded up to the nearest whole number. ctrcct parking rcquircmcnt as providcd in Section 18.410.090. A maximum of 1.2 off-street parking spaces are allowed for each cottage. Fractional parking space maxima are rounded down to the nearest whole number. 4. Garages and carports-. - . - . -- _ . . - - ._ . gGarages and carports are prohibited. 18.240.060 Alternative Standards F. Parking. The provisions and standards of Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Sections 18.410.03C and .6.410.040 apply, except for Subsection 18.410.040.E. The following additional standards also apply: 1. Number of spaces. a. A minimum of one off strcct parking cpacc must be provided for each service, this parking minimum is reduced by half. Fractional parking space minima are rounded up to the nearest whole number. -- _ _ - e : ss _ _ 18.410.090. A maximum of 1.2 off-street parking spaces are allowed for each cottage. Fractional parking space maxima are rounded down to the nearest whole number. 2. Grouping. Off-street parking must be provided in groups of two to four parking spaces where all spaces in a group are contiguous. See Figure 18.240.8. 3. Location. a. Off-street parking spaces must be located a minimum of 20 feet from any street property line, except that parking spaces may be located a minimum of five feet from property line along an alley. b. Off-street parking spaces must be located a minimum of 10 feet from any property line that does not abut a street, alley, or other public right-of-way. Commentary Omnibus Updated to align with new definitions. This reference was simplified. Minimum parking requirements are removed. Updated to align with new definitions. c. Off-street parking spaces must be located a minimum of five feet from any public access easement. d. Off-street parking space groups, including those provided in garages or carports structures, must be separated by a minimum of five feet on all sides from all other parking space groups, garages, carports, parking structures, and cottages on the site. If this separation area is 10 feet or less in width, it must be landscaped to meet the L-2 standard, as provided in Table 18.420.1, except that trees are not required. Separation areas between garages are exempt from the landscaping requirement. 4. Garages and carports". _ - . - . a. The maximum size for any detached garage or carport parking structure is 750 square feet and the maximum height is 15 feet. The square footage of a carport is the total area covered by a roof. b. Each detached garage or carport parking structure must not contain more than four vehicle parking spaces. 18.240.080 Accessory Structures Accessory structures are allowed subject to the following: A. The total maximum floor area of all accessory structures on a lot is 528 square feet. The floor area of garages and carports parking structures does not count toward this maximum. Cottage cluster developments with more than 12 cottages on a lot are allowed an additional 500 square feet of accessory structure floor area, provided that no individual accessory structure exceeds 528 square feet in floor area. 18.250.050 Clear and Objective Standards G. Parking. The provisions and standards of Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Sections 18 n 1 n 036 and 18.410.040 apply, except for Subsection 18.410.040.E. The following additional standards also apply: 1. Number of spaces. a. A minimum of one off street parking space must be provided for each dwelling unit. If the lot is within 2,500 feet of a right of way that includes transit service, this parking minimum is reduced by half. Fractional parking space minima are rounded up to the nearest whole number. Commentary Omnibus Updated to align with new definitions. Updated to align with new definitions. This reference was simplified. Minimum parking requirements are removed. e. A - -- - -- -- -- •- street parking requirement as provided in Section 18.410.090. E A maximum of 1.2 off-street parking spaces are allowed for each dwelling unit. Fractional parking space maxima are rounded down to the nearest whole number. 4. Garages and carports-. _ _ . - . -. _ . . - . .e.-* gGarages and carports are prohibited. 18.250.060 Alternative Standards G. Parking. The provisions and standards of Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Sections 1 Q 4 1 n 03r and 18.410.0/10 apply, except for Subsection 18.410.040.E. The following additional standards also apply: 1. Number of spaces. a. A minimum of one off strcct parking spacc must be providcd for each dwclling unit. If the lot is within 2,500 fcct of a right of way that includcs transit service, this parking minimum is reduced by half. Fractional parking space minima are rounded up to the nearest whole number. parking requirement as provided in Section 18.410.090. e. A maximum of 1.2 off-street parking spaces are allowed for each dwelling unit. Fractional parking space maxima are rounded down to the nearest whole number. 2. Grouping. Off-street parking must be provided in groups of two to four parking spaces where all spaces in a group must be contiguous. See Figure 18.250.9. 3. Location. a. Off-street parking spaces must be located a minimum of 20 feet from any street property line, except that parking spaces may be located a minimum of five feet from property line along an alley. b. Off-street parking spaces must be located a minimum of 10 feet from any property line that does not abut a street, alley, or other public right-of-way. c. Off-street parking spaces must be located a minimum of five feet from any public access easement. Commentary Omnibus Updated to align with new definitions. This reference was simplified. Minimum parking requirements are removed. Updated to align with new definitions. d. Off-street parking space groups, including those provided in garages or carports structures, must be separated by a minimum of five feet on all sides from all other parking space groups, garages or carports parking structures, and dwelling units on the site. If this separation area is 10 feet or less in width, it must be landscaped to meet the L-2 standard, as provided in Table 18.420.1, except that trees are not required. Separation areas between garages are exempt from the landscaping requirement. See Figure 18.250.9. 4. Garages and carports ' . . - - - . a. The maximum size for any detached garage or carport parking structure is 750 square feet and the maximum height is 15 feet. The square footage of a carport is the total area covered by a roof. b. Each detached garage or carport parking structure must not contain more than four vehicle parking spaces. 18.250.070 Accessory Structures Accessory structures are allowed subject to the following: A. The total maximum floor area of all accessory structures on a lot is 528 square feet. The floor area of garages or carports parking structures does not count toward this maximum. Courtyard unit developments with more than 12 dwelling units on a lot are allowed an additional 500 square feet of accessory structure floor area, provided that no individual accessory structure exceeds 528 square feet in floor area. 18.260.040 Mobile Home Park Standards A. Minimum development standards. Mobile home park development must meet the following minimum development standards: 8. Bc partially screened from the public right of way and adjaccnt residcntia[ must not exceed 3 feet in height. B. Other standards. belonging to the occupants or management of the park is prohibited. Commentary Omnibus Updated to align with new definitions. Updated to align with new definitions. This is not a clear and objective standard and should not be applied to housing. This standard is not appropriate for the development code and would be covered by the nuisance code. This reference was simplified. 18.270.040 Clear and Objective Standards E. Parking. The provisions and standards of Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading _ - _. 9.." and '8.110.0 apply, except for Subsection 18.410.040.E. The following additional standards also apply: 1. Number of spaces. a. The required minimum and maximum number of allowed off-street vehicle parking spaces is provided in Table 18.270.2. If the lot is within 2,500 minimum is reduced by half. b. An on street parking credit may be granted for some or all the required off street parking as provided in Section 18.410.090. Table 18.270.2 Quad Vehicle Parking Maximums by Zone RES-A and RES-C RES-D MUR-1 and RES-B MUR-2 Minimum off street parking 4 3 2 None Gpaces Maximum off-street vehicle 5 4 4 4 parking spaces 2. Grouping. Off-street parking spaces including parking provided in garages or carports structures must be grouped. 3. Location. a. Off-street parking spaces, including those in garages or carports, and structurcc, must be located a minimum of 20 feet from any street property line, except alley property lines, where parking may be provided within five feet of the property line. b. Off-street parking spaces, including those in garages or carports, a-nd structures must not be located within 10 feet of any other property line. c. Covered parking may be provided under the first story of the quad, provided that this parking is accessed from the rear of the building and is not visible from the street. 4. Garages and carports'. _ . _ - . One garage or carport parking structure is allowed per quad development, subject to the following: Commentary Omnibus Minimum parking requirements are removed. Updated to align with new definitions. a. The maximum size is 750 square feet; and b. The maximum height is 15 feet. 18.270.050 Accessory Structures Accessory structures are allowed subject to the following: A. The total maximum floor area of all accessory structures on the lot is 528 square feet. The floor area of garages or carports parking structure& does not count toward this maximum. 18.280.040 Clear and Objective Standards D. Parking. The provisions and standards of Chapter 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading Sections 1R 41 n nRC and 18.410.040 apply, except for Subsection 18.410.040.E. -- _ _ _ . .. _ . -e . _ . _ . . _ 1. Number of spaces. a. A minimum of one off street parking space must be provided for each rowhouse. __ off street parking as provided in Section 18.410.090. 1 2. Access. Access to off-street parking areas for rowhouse development may be taken through tandem driveways, shared access, or from an alley. The following requirements apply to each situation in addition to the relevant sections of Chapter 18.920, Access, Egress, and Circulation. a. Tandem driveways. If access is taken from a street other than an alley and access is not shared development-wide, the following standards apply. See Figure 18.280.1 for examples. i. A maximum of one driveway is allowed for every two dwelling units, except that each rowhouse grouping of three or more dwelling units may include one driveway that provides access to a single dwelling unit. Shared access is subject to the requirements of Subsection 18.920.030.C. Commentary Omnibus Updated to align with new definitions. This reference was simplified. Minimum parking requirements are removed. ii. The minimum width for a driveway is 15 feet, except that a single unshared driveway may be 10 feet in width. iii. The maximum width for a driveway is 18 feet, except that the maximum width for a single unshared driveway is 12 feet. iv. Driveways must be located a minimum of 18 feet apart to minimize vehicle conflicts with pedestrians. Distance between driveways is measured along the front property line. Figure 18.280.1 Access Configuration for Tandem Driveways Rowhcuse Rowhouse Rowhoose Rowhouse R4whDUse Rowhme Rowhvuse Rowhoine Tandem Tandem Tandem ranoem Driveway Driveway 17)/in 4ide alk 18" F�18' 118 15' ilf= 18.E 15' STREET STREET b. Shared access. If access for all dwelling units in a rowhouse development is shared and off-street parking areas are provided at the side or rear of a rowhouse development rather than at the front of each dwelling unit, the minimum paved width of the shared access is 20 feet and the maximum width is 24 feet. Figure 18.280.2 Access Configuration for Shared Access Commentary Omnibus I I I I 1 11 Off-s/reet parking area Aawhoase Rawhousc Rowhause Rowhou.e Aowhouse Aowhause Rowhouse Rowhow ■ ■ Shared l ACCt555 Sidewark 7- 20 STREET c. Alley access. If access is taken from an alley, the following standards apply: i. A maximum of one access is allowed for each dwelling unit. ii. The minimum paved width of an alley access is 10 feet. 2 3. Location. Off-street parking areas, including detached garages and carports parking structures, must be located a minimum of 20 feet from any street property line, except alley property lines, where no minimum setback is required. 3 4. Garages and carports'. • . . - . Garages and carports Parking ctructurca in rowhouse developments are subject to the following: a. Detached garages or carports parking structures must be located a minimum of 40 feet from a street property line where rowhouses provide main entrances. b. The maximum size for a detached garage or carport parking structure is 200 square feet per rowhouse served by the structure. c. The maximum height for a detached garage or carport parking structure is 15 feet. 4 5. Screening. Screening of parking areas is not required, except that in the RES-A through RES-C zones, off-street parking areas provided at the side or rear of buildings and not in garages structures must be screened from adjacent properties to the S-3 standard, as provided in Table 18.420.2. The required screening must be provided on the same site as the development. Commentary Omnibus Updated to align with new definitions. 18.290.040 Clear and Objective Standards B. Development standards. Development standards for small form residential development are provided in Table 18.290.1. Table 18.290.1 Development Standards for Small Form Residential Standard RES-A RES-B RES-C RES-D MUC-1 and RES- E [1] Minimum Setbacks (ft) -Front 20 15 10 10 0 [2] - Street side 20 15 10 10 0 [2] - Side 5 5 5 5 0 - Rear 25 15 15 15 0 - Garaie [3] 20 20 20 20 20 Maximum Hei_ht 30 30 35 35 70 Maximum Lot Covera_e 80% 80% 80% 80% 90% Minimum landscape area 20% 20% 20% 20% 10% [4] Minimum Parking 1 off street vehicle parking space per lot [5] [1] Development standards for small form residential development and allowed accessory uses and structures in the RES-E zone apply only to lots with existing nonconforming development. New construction of small form residential development is not allowed except as provided in Chapter 18.50, Nonconforming Circumstances. [2] The maximum front and street side setback is 20 feet. [3] The minimum garage setback applies to garages and carports. The minimum setback may be reduced to 0 feet where vehicle access is taken from an alley. [4] The minimum landscape area must be planted to the L-1 standard. Landscaping standards are provided in Chapter 18.420, Landscaping and Screening. Small form residential development is exempt from the general provisions of Section 18.420.030. [5] The minimum parking standard may be met with an on street parking credit. On street parking credit standards are provided in Section 18.410.090. 18.310.030 Exceptions to Setback, Height, and Parking Standards Commentary Omnibus Minimum parking requirements are removed. Removed reference to on-street parking credit that is no longer needed. Removed this exception as it is no longer needed. D. Exception to minimum parking. The minimum number of required off street vehicle parking spaces may be reduced by 1 space for every 5 percent of effective tree canopy prcscrvation may not cxcccd 20 perccnt of the minimum numbcr of rcquircd parking 18.320.040 Development Standards A. Base zone standards. Base zone development standards are provided in Table 18.320.1. C. Pedestrian access. 2. Paths must provide safe and convenient pedestrian access within the site between all buildings, uses, and areas designed for use by pedestrians. Paths within parking areas or along drive aisles are subject to additional standards in Chapter 18.410, Off-Street Parking and Loading Subsection 18.410.040.8. E. Lighting. 1. Minimum illumination levels are measured horizontally at ground level. a. The minimum average illumination is 1.5 footcandles for paths, except those within parking areas, which are subject to the lighting standards in Chapter 18.410, Off-Street Parking and Loading Subsection 18.410.040.H. All points of measurement must be a minimum of 0.5 footcandles. F. Other standards. Nonresidential dDevelopment in commercial zones is subject to all other applicable standards requirements of this title including but not limited to standards related to parking and loading, streets and utilities, sensitive lands, and signs. 18.330.040 Development Standards F. Other standards. Development in commercial zones is subject to all other applicable standards of this title including but not limited to standards related to parking and loading, streets and utilities, sensitive lands, and signs. 18.350.040 Development Standards E. Pedestrian access. Commentary Omnibus This reference was simplified. This reference was simplified. Added this language so that this chapter is aligned with 18.320. This reference was simplified. 2. Paths must provide safe and convenient pedestrian access within the site between all buildings, uses, and areas designed for use by pedestrians. Paths within parking areas or along drive aisles are subject to additional standards in Chapter 18.410, Off-Street Parking and Loading Subsection 18.410.0'10.6. Paths must be constructed with a hard surface material and have a minimum unobstructed width of 5 feet to meet this standard. 18.650.030 Approval Process B. Review thresholds. If a proposed development or modification is unlisted, the Director will determine the most appropriate review type. This determination is the final local decision and will favor the review type that provides the most appropriate public notice and opportunity for public comment. 1. Type I downtown development review. A Type I downtown development review is required for the following: e. Modification of off-street parking with no reduction in parking spaces or increase in parking spaces or paved area; • _ 18.650.050 Development Standards B. Parking. 5. All apartment developments must provide a minimum of one parking space per unit. Adequate provisions for barrier free parking must be provided as required by the state building code. Visitor parking spaces are not required. Adjustments to the bicycle parking requirements are prohibited. 6. For all other uses, the minimum off street vehicle parking requirements arc 75% of the total computed from Table 18.410.3. Adjustments to the bicycle parking requirements arc prohibited. e 9,999 - feet in the Main Street Center Street sub arca except that any apartments must provide a minimum of one parking space per unit. 8. When calculating the total minimum number of vehicle parking spaces required in Table 18.410.3, fractional space requirements are rounded down to the nearest whole consecutive number. Commentary Omnibus Removed references to minimum parking requirements and modifications dealing with them. Removed minimum parking requirements. 9. Motorcycle or scooter parking may substitute for up to five required parking requirement is reduced by one space. Each motorcycle space must be at least four feet wide and eight feet deep. Existing parking may be converted to take advantage of this provision. 18.650.080 Specific Adjustments B. Adjustments to parking. Minimum off street parking space requirements may be waived or reduced when one or more of the following are met: 1. The proposed use is permanent in nature and has a clear public benefit (for 2. The proposed waiver or reduction will result in the preservation of existing natural features on the site for public use or bcncfit. B G. Adjustments for private or shared outdoor area. Private outdoor area and shared outdoor recreation areas requirements may be waived or reduced when one or more of the following are met: 1. The proposed use is permanent in nature and has a clear public benefit (for example, affordable or senior housing); or 2. The total square footage of private outdoor areas and shared outdoor recreation areas equals or exceeds the combined standard for both. C D. Adjustments to density and height. Qualified affordable housing developments are eligible for both density and height bonuses. 18.660.070 Site Design Standards D. Off-street vehicle parking and loading. 1. Quantity. -- _ .. . .• - - - • - -- - - - -- -- - - - The maximum quantity standard for off-street parking is provided in Table 18.410.3. This standard is not eligible for adjustment through the review process provided in Paragraph 18.660.040.C.4 or elsewhere in this title. There is no minimum or maximum quantity standard for off-street loading areas. 18.710.020 Summary of Land Use Applications Commentary Omnibus Removed an adjustment to parking that is no longer needed. Removed reference to minimum parking requirement. Removed an application that was erroneously left in this table. Table 18.710.1 Summary of Land Use Applications Abbreviation Land Use Application Type Applicable Review Section Type ADU Acce tory Dwelling Unit 18.220 f Adequate Public Facilities Exception MIS 18.640 II (inside River Terrace) Adjustment - Inside River Terrace Plan District 18.640 ADJ - Inside Downtown Tigard Plan District 18.650 II - Inside TMU zone 18.660 - Citywide 18.715 ZCA Annexation 18.720 III-Modified, Legislative (N/A) Appeal 18.710 III-various CPA Comprehensive Plan Map 18 790 III-Modified, Amendment Legislative CPA Comprehensive Plan Text 18.790 Legislative Amendment CUP Conditional Use 18.740 III-HO DCA Development Code Text Amendment 18.790 Legislative DIR Director Determination 18.730 I DDR Downtown Development Review 18.650 I, II (N/A) Extension 18.745 I, II MIS Historic Resource Designation or 18.750 II, Ill-PC Alteration HOP Home Occupation Permit 18.760 I, II MLP Land Partition 18.820 II LLA Lot Line Adjustment or Lot 18.810 I Consolidation MAR Marijuana Facility Permit 18.430 I Modification MMD - Minor 18.765 I - Major II PDR Planned Development 18.770 II, Ill-PC SLR Sensitive Lands Review 18.510 I, II, III-HO Commentary Omnibus Table 18.710.1 Summary of Land Use Applications Abbreviation Land Use Application Type Applicable Review Section Type SGN Sign Permit 18.435 I SDR Site Development Review 18.780 I, II SUB Subdivision 18.830 II SBP Sublot Plat 18.840 II-Modified TUP Temporary Use Permit 18.440 I MIS Transportation Mitigation (inside TMU 18.660 II zone) UFR Urban Forestry Plan Modification or 18.420 I, Ill-HO, III- Discretionary Review _ PC Zoning Map Amendment III-PC, ZON - Quasi-Judicial (site specific) 18.790 III-Modified, - Legislative (citywide) Legislative 18.765.060 Minor Modifications B. Examples. Examples of minor modifications include, but are not limited to, the following: 4. Change to the site that requires review of parking lot design or maximum parking standards.recults in a change in the number or configuration of parking spaces. Commentary Omnibus Reworded to focus only on changes that would require review of maximum parking standards. Parking Compliance Project Clean without Omnibus December 13, 2022 Chapter 18.410 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING 18.410.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards to ensure the following goals are met: A. Off-street vehicle parking and maneuvering areas should be: 1. Limited in scale, 2. Appropriately located to increase safety and minimize conflicts with non- motorized vehicles and pedestrians, and 3. Adequately maintained, and 4. Designed in a manner to mitigate heat island effects or generate sustainable power. B. Parking structures should: 1. Include pedestrian-friendly ground floor façades, and 2. Minimize conflicts at ingress and egress points. C. Off-street bicycle parking areas should be: 1. Sufficiently sized to meet the current and future needs of bicyclists, and 2. Located to ensure safety, reduce theft, and increase convenience. 18.410.020 Applicability A. Applicability. The provisions of this chapter apply to all new development and all modifications to existing development, including changes of use, unless stated otherwise. B. Unlisted uses. Where a use in not listed in Table 18.410.3, a use determination may be requested as provided in Section 18.60.030 for the purposes of determining the maximum vehicle parking and minimum bicycle parking standards of this chapter. 18.410.030 Vehicle Parking and Loading Standards A. Quantity. 1. The ratios for the maximum number of off-street vehicle parking spaces allowed are provided in Table 18.410.3, subject to the following: a. If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than six parking spaces for a development with less than 1,000 square feet of floor area, the development is allowed up to six parking spaces. b. If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than 10 vehicle parking spaces for a development between 1,000 and 2,000 square feet, the development is allowed up to 10 vehicle parking spaces. c. If a development is approved with no specified use, the development must apply the maximum parking standard for the use category that would allow the fewest number of parking spaces, chosen from all the uses that could be contained within the building type(s). d. In mixed-use and multi-tenant developments, the maximum allowable vehicle parking is determined individually for each use. d. The following types of parking areas are not included when calculating the maximum number of vehicle parking spaces allowed: 1. Parking spaces contained in a parking structure; 2. Market-rate paid parking spaces; 3. Designated carpool or vanpool spaces; 4. Designated accessible parking spaces; 5. Fleet vehicle storage; and 6. Vehicle storage spaces for sale, lease, or rent. B. Vehicular access. Vehicular access to off-street vehicle parking or loading areas must meet the requirements of Chapter 18.920, Access, Egress, and Circulation and Chapter 18.930, Vision Clearance Areas. C. Pedestrian access. Paths that cross access driveways or that provide access to vehicle or bicycle parking areas are subject to the following: 1. Paths must be physically separated from vehicle parking and maneuvering areas by either a minimum 6-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum 3- foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are allowed for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used; 2. Paths must be a minimum of 4 feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts; and 3. Paths must be in compliance with applicable federal and state accessibility standards. D. Drive-through facilities. 1. All uses with drive-through facilities must provide on-site stacking lanes for inbound vehicles as provided in Table 18.410.1. Table 18.410.1 Stacking Lane Requirements Use Stacking Lane Requirement Banks 150 feet/service terminal Automated teller machines 50 feet/automated teller machine Cleaners,repair services 50 feet Restaurants 200 feet Drive-in theaters 200 feet Fueling stations 75 feet between curb cut and nearest fueling kiosk Car washes 75 feet/washing unit Parking facilities: Table 18.410.1 Stacking Lane Requirements Use Stacking Lane Requirement -With automatic ticket dispensing 50 feet/entry driveway -With staffed ticket dispensing 100 feet/entry driveway -With valet or attendant parking 100 feet 2. Stacking lanes must be designed so that they do not interfere with off- street parking areas or with vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation. E. Surfacing. Off-street parking areas must be paved with an asphalt, concrete, or pervious paving surface, except for the following: 1. Off-street parking areas associated with a temporary use application, as provided in Chapter 18.440, Temporary Uses, provided the approval authority determines that unpaved parking will not create adverse conditions. 2. Off-street overflow parking areas in the Parks and Recreation zone. F. Striping. 1. All off-street parking spaces must be clearly and separately identified with pavement markings or contrasting paving materials, except for spaces provided with the following types of development: a. Small form residential; b. Detached accessory dwelling units; or c. Any other residential development where spaces are not grouped. 2. All interior vehicle drives and access aisles must be clearly marked and signed to show direction of flow. G. Wheel stops. Parking bumpers or wheel stops a minimum of four inches in height must be provided a minimum of three feet from the front of vehicle parking spaces wherever vehicles can encroach on a right-of-way or pedestrian path. Curbing may substitute for wheel stops if vehicles will not encroach into the minimum required width for landscape or pedestrian paths. H. Lighting. Lighting must be provided that meets the following standards: 1. All pedestrian paths in parking areas and providing access to parking areas must be illuminbated to a minimum level of 0.5 footcandles at all points, measured horizontally at the ground level. 2. Lighting luminaires must have a cutoff angle of 90 degrees or greater to ensure that lighting is directed toward the parking surface. 3. Lighting may not cause a light trespass of more than 0.5 footcandles measured vertically at the boundaries of the site. I. Space and aisle dimensions. The minimum dimensional standards for surface parking spaces and drive aisles are provided in Figure 18.410.1 and Table 18.410.2. Figure 18.410.1 Parking Dimension Factors Parking angle fA1 StaII width(1315.-4.4 I Aisle(D} Stall depth Parkin. perpendicular space or to aisle tE)\ stall Curb length(C) Table 18.410.2 Minimum Parking Space and Aisle Dimensions Stall Width Curb Length 1 Way Aisle 2 Way Aisle Angle (A) Stall Depth (E) (B) (C) Width (D) Width(D) 0° (Parallel) 8 ft. 22 ft. 6 in. 12 ft. 20 ft. 8 ft. 30° 8 ft. 6 in. 17 ft. 12 ft. 20 ft. 15 ft. 45° 8 ft. 6 in. 12 ft. 12 ft. 20 ft. 17 ft. 60° 8 ft. 6 in. 9 ft. 9 in. 16 ft. 20 ft. 17 ft. 6 in. 90° 8 ft. 6 in. 8 ft. 6 in. 20 ft. 20 ft. 16 ft. J. Accessible parking. Where off-street vehicle parking is provided, it must include the required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces as specified by the state building code and federal standards. Such parking spaces must be sized, signed, and marked as required by these regulations and in compliance with ORS 447. K. Loading areas. All off-street vehicle loading areas for passengers or goods must: 1. Include sufficient area for turning and maneuvering of vehicles on site. At a minimum, the maneuvering length must be at least twice the overall length of the longest vehicle using the site. 2. Be designed such that vehicle stacking does not impact any public right- of-way. 18.410.040 Parking Structure Standards A. First-story windows and wall openings. All street-facing facades of parking structures must include windows, doors, or display areas on a minimum of 20% of the first-story facade area excluding those portions of the facade devoted to vehicular access, stairwells, elevators, and centralized payment booths. Required windows must have a sill no more than four feet above grade. Where the interior floor level prohibits such placement, the sill may be raised to allow it to be no more than two feet above finished floor wall up to a maximum sill height of six feet above grade. B. Exit warning bell. All exits from parking structures within 15 feet of public sidewalks or pedestrian paths must include an audible and visible signal that alerts non-motorized traffic when vehicles are exiting. C. Parking layout and internal circulation. The required space and aisle dimensions within a parking structure are provided in Figure 18.410.1 and Table 18.410.2. 18.410.050 Bicycle Parking Standards A. Quantity. The minimum number of required bicycle parking spaces is provided in Table 18.410.3. If application of the minimum bicycle parking standard results in less than two spaces, then the development must provide at least two spaces. Small form residential, accessory dwelling units, cottage clusters, courtyard units, quads, and rowhouses are exempt from minimum bicycle parking standards. B. Location. Required bicycle parking must be located within 50 feet of a required or main entrance of a primary building, except that required bicycle parking for mixed-use or nonresidential development that includes any vehicle parking within a parking structure must be covered and located within 100 feet of a required or main entrance of a primary building. C. Design. 1. Bicycle racks must be designed to allow a bicycle frame to lock to it at two points of contact, except that spiral racks and wave racks with more than one loop are prohibited; 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall, or other structure; 3. Bicycle parking spaces must be at least 2.5 feet in width and six feet in length and have an access between each row of spaces that is at least five feet in width. Covered bicycle parking must provide a vertical clearance of seven feet; and 4. Bicycle parking spaces must be paved with a dust-free hard surface material. D. Lighting. Lighting must be provided that meets the following standards: 1. All bicycle parking areas and paths providing access to these areas must be illuminated to a minimum level of 0.5 footcandles at all points, measured horizontally at the ground level. 2. Lighting luminaires must have a cutoff angle of 90 degrees or greater to ensure that lighting is directed toward the parking surface. 3. Lighting may not cause a light trespass of more than 0.5 footcandles measured vertically at the boundaries of the site. 18.410.060 Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Quantity Standards Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Quantity Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Use Category Maximum Maximum Bicycle Minimum (Zone A) 1 (Zone B) [1] Residential Use Category Residential Use See applicable housing type development standards chapter in 18.200. The residential component of a mixed-use development must use the parking requirements for apartments. Civic/Institutional Use Categories Basic Utilities None None None Colleges 1.0/3.3 1.0/3.3 1.0/3.0 students/staff students/staff students/staff Community Services 2.5/1,000 4.0/1,000 0.3/1,000 Cultural Institutions 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 1.0/1,000 Day Care Home: None Home:None Home: None Commercial: Commercial: Commercial: 2.7/1,000 3.2/1,000 1.5/classroom Emergency Services 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.5/1,000 Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Quantity Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Use Categor Maximum Maximum Bicycle Minimum (Zone Al [1] Zone B) [1] Medical Centers 2.7/1,000 3.2/1,000 0.2/1,000 Postal Services 3.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Religious Institutions 1.0/1.7 seats in 1.0/1.3 seats in 1.0/20 seats in main main assembly main assembly assembly area area area Schools Preschool: Preschool: Preschool: 7.0 + 0.0+ 1.0/classroom 1.0/classroom 1.0/classroom Elementary/JR: Elementary/JR: Elementary/JR: 6.0/classroom 2.5/classroom 3.5/classroom SR: 6.0/classroom SR: 1.0/3.3 SR: 1.0/3.3 students/staff students/staff Social/Fraternal 12.0/1,000 14.0/1,000 main 2.0/1,000 main Clubs/Lodges main assembly assembly area assembly area area Temporary Shelter None None 1.0/5 beds Commercial Use Categories Adult Entertainment 3.5/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.5/1,000 1.0/1.25 seats 1.0/2 seats 1.0/20 seats Animal-Related 4.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Commercial Bulk Sales 1.3/1,000 2.0/1,000 0.3/1,000 Commercial Lodging 1.2/room 1.4/room 1.0/10 rooms Custom Arts and Crafts 5.1/1,000 6.2/1,000 0.3/1,000 Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Quantity Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Use Categor Maximum Maximum Bicycle Minimum Zone A [1] (Zone B) [1] Eating and Drinking Fast food: Fast food: All: 1.0/1,000 Establishments [2] 12.4/1,000 14.9/1,000 Other: Other: 19.1/1,000 23.0/1,000 Indoor Entertainment 5.4/1,000 6.5/1,000 10.5/1,000 Theater: 1.0/2.5 Theater: 1.0/2 Theater: 1.0/10 seats seats seats Major Event 1.0/2.5 seats or 1.0/2 seats or 1.0/10 seats Entertainment 1.0/5 ft of 1.0/4 ft of bench or 40 ft of bench bench Motor Vehicle 1.3/1,000 but 2.0/1,000 but no 0.2/1,000 sales Sales/Rental no less than 4 less than 4 area Motor Vehicle 2.3/1,000 but 2.6/1,000 but no 0.2/1,000 Servicing/Repair no less than 4 less than 4 Non-Accessory Parking None None None Office Non-medical: Non-medical: Non-medical: 3.4/1,000 4.1/1,000 0.5/1,000 Medical: Medical: Medical: 0.4/1,000 4.9/1,000 5.9/1,000 Outdoor Entertainment 4.5/1,000 5.0/1,000 0.4/1,000 Outdoor Sales 1.3/1,000 sales 2.0/1,000 sales 0.1/1,000 sales area area area Personal Services 3.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 All: 1.0/1,000 Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Quantity Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Use Category Maximum Maximum Bicycle Minimum (Zone A) [1] Zone B) [1] Bank with Bank with drive-through: drive-through: 5.4/1,000 6.5/1,000 Repair-Oriented Retail 4.0/1,000 4.5/1,000 0.3/1,000 Sales-Oriented Retail 5.1/1,000 6.2/1,000 0.3/1,000 Self-Service Storage 1.0/4 storage 1.0/2 storage 1.0/40 storage units units units Vehicle Fuel Sales 4.0 + 4.0+2.5/service 0.2/1,000 2.0/service bay bay Industrial Use Categories General Industrial None None 0.1/1,000 Heavy Industrial None None 0.1/1,000 Industrial Services 1.2/1,000 1.8/1,000 0.1/1,000 Light Industrial None None 0.1/1,000 Railroad Yards None None None Research and 3.0/1,000 3.8/1,000 0.5/1,000 Development Warehouse/Freight <150,000 sq ft: <150,000 sq ft: All: 0.1/1,000 Movement 0.8/1,000 1.2/1,000 >150,000 sq ft: >150,000 sq ft: 0.4/1,000 0.5/1,000 Waste-Related 7.0 10.0 None Wholesale Sales 1.2/1,000 1.8/1,000 0.1/1,000 her Use Categories Agriculture/Horticulture None None None Cemeteries None None None Table 18.410.3 Vehicle and Bicycle Parking Quantity Standards Parking space standards are calculated using the floor area for each use in a development unless otherwise stated. Vehicle Vehicle Use Categor Maximum Maximum Bicycle Minimum (Zone A) [1] Zone B) [1] Detention Facilities None None 1.0/2.5 beds Heliports None None None Mining None None None Wireless None None None Communication Facilities Transportation/Utility None None None Corridors [1] Maximum parking ratios are in compliance with the Metro Regional Transportation Functional Plan. Zone A standards apply where 20-minute peak hour transit service is available within 0.25 miles walking distance for bus transit or 0.5 miles walking distance for high-capacity transit. Zone B standards apply to areas not in Zone A. The Director maintains a map that shows the locations of Zones A and B. [2] Fast food designation includes all eating and drinking establishments with a "walk-up counter" or less than 10 tables in the dining area.■ Schuyler Warren From: KELLY Laura * DLCD <Laura.KELLY@dlcd.oregon.gov> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 3:47 PM To: Schuyler Warren Subject: DCA2022-00005 DLCD review Hi Schuyler, DLCD's CFEC team has completed review of DCA2022-00005- proposed removal of parking requirements to implement CFEC rules. Just wanted to pass along that it all looks good and the proposal satisfies the requirements of OAR 660-012- 0430 and -0440. As you know,the city will need to implement 660-012-0405 through 0415 by June 30, 2023 or receive approval for an extension. Please see the CFEC website for additional information. In addition, DLCD has recently published guidance on extensions (AKA "alternative dates"),which can be found here: https://www.oregon.gov/Icd/CL/Documents/GuidanceAlternativeDates.pdf. DLCD appreciates the leadership Tigard has shown in implementing the rules. Sincerely, Laura Laura Kelly ILPortland Metro Regional Representative for Metro,Washington County, isupor and Select Cities of Columbia County I Portland Metro Regional Solutions Mir Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Cell: 503-798-7587 I Main: 503-373-0050 DLCD laura.kelly@dlcd.oregon.gov I www.oregon.gov/LCD Legislative Public Hearing : Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities Required Parking Reform Development Code Text Amendments DCA2022 -00005 December 13, 2022 eT . Tigai CITY OF The 5 E's — Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence rd Updated State Transportation Planning Rules • Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities Rulemaking • Governor's Executive Order 20-04 • Goal 1 : reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions • Goal 2: promote equity in transportation and land use planning • Two deadlines approaching — both • First set of rules effective January 1 , 2023 Aist„• Second set effective July 1 , 2023 Uif• CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Updated TPlanning Rules Two Areas of Importance Due to Deadlines • Reform minimum parking requirements and parking management (Choice of pathways) • Update parking lot standards (Required in all cases) CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence By By 12/31/22 6/30/23 . E 1 Remove all Adopt Adopt Path 1 parking parking lot No further action needed parking requirements standards aximums* — Adopt all: Reduce or • No small unit residential minimums ve remoAdopt Adopt Path certain arkin lot • No parking minimums for redev. parking p g • Remove some comm. minima parking . standards maximums* • Reduce certain minimums requirements Meter some on-street res. parking Al Adopt 3 of 5: dr-Reduce or • Unbundle res. parking remove Adopt Adopt � • Unbundle comm. parking ath 3 certain parking lot parking • Require commute benefits •parking standards Tax on parking lot revenue maximums* requirements • Reduce apartment minimums m r By By 12/31/22 6/30/23 . E 1 Remove all Adopt Adopt Path 1 parking parking lot No further action needed parking requirements standards aximums* — Adopt all: Reduce or • No small unit residential minimums ve remoAdopt Adopt Path certain arkin lot • No parking minimums for redev. parking p g • Remove some comm. minima parking . standards maximums* • Reduce certain minimums requirements Meter some on-street res. parking Al Adopt 3 of 5: dr-Reduce or • Unbundle res. parking remove Adopt Adopt � • Unbundle comm. parking ath 3 certain parking lot parking • Require commute benefits •parking standards Tax on parking lot revenue maximums* requirements • Reduce apartment minimums m r Why Was Path 1 Recommended? • Supported by committees • Aligns with City policies and goals • Simplifies code for applicants — single approach • Allows market determination of appropriate parking counts • Avoids overparking e Iigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Why Are Paths 2 or 3 Not Recommended? • 62% of city will be parking -exempt with these paths anyway • The remaining 38% is mainly lower-density residential • Creates barriers to development • Move us in opposite direction of last decade of work to make code more streamlined, clear, equitable e CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Tigard Precedents - Triangle and Downtown • Tigard Triangle Lean Code included no parking requirements • Development has continued apace, with parking included • Analysis shows developments build just under old minimum • Developments get creative with shared parking • Fosters a more walkable development pattern • Reduces unnecessary expense e CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Summary of Code Changes - Chapter 18.410 • Updated purpose statements • Removed all minimum parking requirements • Reorganized for clarity • Clarified which standards apply to which type of parking • Consolidated standards • Removed on -street parking credit Iigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence SummaryChangesof Code - Omnibus • Updated definitions • Added definitions for terms — garage, carport, parking lot • Updated references to be more broad • Removed minimum parking requirements for housing • Clarified language on garages and carports • Removed some outdated standards for mobile homes er ixed an error where ADU was still listed as an application type CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Recommendation • Planning Commission unanimously recommend City Council adopt. e Iig'a rd The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Thank You Discussion and questions et. Tiga• CITYOF The 5 E's — Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence rd Background • Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities Rulemaking • Began with Gov. Brown's Executive Order 20-04 (May 2020) • Goal 1 : reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions • Goal 2: promote equity in transportation and land use planning • Rulemaking started in 2020 • Adopted by LCDC on 7/21 /22 CITYOFTigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Parkingis ExpensiveLIVING VS PARKING ISM SPACE SPACE parking required by city laws across Cascadia 2 �6urna by N.Vanwurer..`Parking has a high cost in ` �:SVrgy RkhmondM�_� fnI �MINAbbots f ord apartment terms of both land usage PERPAR : Valar 4¢- PER. PARTMETMENT 'e ..�°`a r .�a2, j e' " P £;•,�2 Victoria FOR VARIOUS d•2 d' s!•° UNIT SIZES - n0P•ac °°`�`a'.e`a I v a- �maa per°ar� "--M•Everett and dollarsss•-0- isrpaces Pe mon,apartment Seanlei.—r•lBellevue , Tacoma��ti Kent Ire ne LL yy Q�Yawma Hil�oro Moi ancower P x 'Portland Beaverton •Gresha:., 711 apartment parking 5,000 M T g Salem Dm recraa=gle(325 fta� m I areas 410' 'Eugene and include apace _</ �.i/ nidal cost per space , , moBend twee.I gnSda ✓ \ for surface parking ® PARKING REQUIRED FORA ..� P P ',' ,,,_g.e-...i —_ 2 6R APARTMENT(900 FT'' 2 BEDROOM APARTMENT 1.5 PARKING SPACES MeridianME SOO FT' INCLUDING AISLES QUMedford Nampa•.~`•■Boise 488 FT graphing parking Sightline UI Average parking requirement for apartments is more than half the apartment's square footage • CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Cities RemovingParkingRequirements • Beaverton • Portland • Milwaukie • We are hearing that more are headed this direction, but are • West Linn yet to start the work • Bend • Corvallis • Millersburg Iig'a rd The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Precedents Exist Across the Country •^algary MB 4 • Canada ON QC .. '.Vancore• • �seama ND . r'u O WA MT • __� • • -41110.0"se.n. MoMrAal; 444, • r.�. ( onC ME • •OR SD • y� I Taranto • • • • • • NH • • • • WY • • MIS,I • 41t 1'J1' •�•�$ r • NE • • •Ch' • • _�ia«�a� • PA • • • .s�[tai�e city • %.3.3.,:caolLPibtir�� .ew York • NV UT � � •��^� MD Philadelphia • �.k.u�L. • KS .Lnx WV . ,Nashnglan San Francisco'''.sen.i�e Y • MO • • ins Nw AZ 'Albuquerque • .MempFb TN .••.abn• •�AliVele ••Phoenix NM • �`�'�"� 1��w+aSIC San Diega�_,' •••Dallas MS I AL GA .Herr�llnn Tijuana '� •Juarez • TX LA • a •HouSmn `' •�f • FL i .Chihuahua awl Mtorio GUfacb .Mornertey „N;am; Scope of Rerorro .Naesae Regional 1,Cpan Citywide Mexico City CenterrDistrict f •Navane ■TsOnenOetl Cuba 1 .r.a,riit n streevspecial Ti CITY OF a The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Cities With No Minimum ParkingRequirements • Raleigh, NC (2022) • Ann Arbor, MI (2022) • Many more currently in • Minneapolis, MN (2021 ) . South Bend, IN (2021 ) adoption process: • St. Paul •MN 2021 • Alameda CA 2021 ' Cambridge, MA • Bridgeport, CT 2021 • Jackson, TN (2021 ) San Jose, CA ( ) • New Haven •CT 2021 • Dunwood GA 2019 ' Culver City, CA • Richmond, VA (2021 ) • Auburn, ME (2022) Iigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Impacts of Removing Parking Requirements Buffalo Case Study • Found overall 21 % reduction in off-street parking after removing parking requirements • Mixed -use developments in transit corridors are most likely to reduce parking counts • Market continues to provide off-street parking due to demand Daniel Baldwin Hess & Jeffrey Rehler (2021) Minus Minimums, Journal of the American Planning Association, 87:3, 396-408 CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Two Areas of Rulemaking Regional plans to Land use and achievep ollution transportation rules reducing pollution reduction targets and promoting equity 11Z CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Two Areas of Rulemaking Regional plans to Land use and achievep ollution transportation rules reducing pollution reduction targets and promoting equity 11Z CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Outreach Summary • Compressed compliance timetable - rules adopted 7/25/22 • Significant stakeholder feedback during rules adoption • CD team briefings: • Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee - 9/7/22 • Tigard Planning Commission - 9/19/22 • Compliance projects have limited engagement opportunity e Iigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Two Types of ParkingReform Rules Required in all Required only if city instances chooses not to remove minimum parking requirements ei . Iigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingLot Standards - Required in All Instances By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • Adopt improved parking lot standards iierigm t • EV-ready parking lots Path 2 • Choice of: • Minimum amount of solar cover or • Minimum amount of tree canopy Path 3 tz. • Allow redevelopment of parking • CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingMaxima- Required in All Instances By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • Adopt parking maxima F ' ` • Tigard already has parking maximums Path 2 • Part of Metro Urban Growth Management ., Functional Plan • Could opt to lower maximums, cannot raise. Path 3 • Could opt for no action on this item at this time ' R Iigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingReform Phase I - Required for Paths 2 and 3 By December 31 , 2022 Path 1 • No minimum parking requirements in 2040 Centers and 1/4 mile from them - .q Washington S g , Downtown, Triangle, King City, Progress Ridge _-Pat" z • Or: . Fr • adopt parking benefit district in each 2040 center Path 3 • remove all commercial parking requirements and N„,1 • reducearkin minimum for residential to 0.5/unit p g CITYOFTigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence 2040 Metro Analysis Centers tiiii, Parking Exclusions ■ 0 2040 MetroAnalysis Centers0ANL I-1 2040 Metro Analysis Centers Buffer 41,, 217 ,h0.. iiiiiello -,t, ill A All WIPP. Nn o o.as os 11111 r0 4111.1W- $" �,, g..-• R4 �Ml= /1.1106 t n :� fir■ • 131L5SW H.111l.d jVIlalli MC, nt a. 9., • 1,4." GARn pS rgi.d.o �n maa3 , ! i / ::, P , �� I TIM� 03.G39.d1 l ¢ ¢ a ! ... „ , 4-0, ,i,•.. a va....... " ..... , , I ,-.. 4.,-,..(..-•.,. II \ . ....i,. si, , ... 7" 1�� .o�No-s1---Is �.. �� s f P4 , &N21 nr 1�iI.. �•�•�. 1 II }' .,i, — 4,,5, SRR 1., ■ 9h]SS R0.—_.••.... i m re9 :.... ,:\ IIII I I Ar �. IIS #4L ' 11 �'mi ( -GAALp-s7 \\ MIV II 1 .11E. �r BIJL-L Mfl41NTAIN•RU rz BONI•TA•RD11 _n . -, 1.... _,... Fr._ -imp • 1111101161"11. 1112 IN EX .111 MIN '' 1111111WATIMIIIIIATI41611E:11 miol, ik ii*darilUfil aili. =1111 iii P mmm , • ^_, ..RHA•M•R.d �',t ��t ,,,, hy 1 .„,....._it, `� �I F. 1 ParkingReform Phase I - Required for Paths 2 and 3 By December 31 , 2022 Path 1 • No minimum parking requirements near transit itza. • Within 3/4 mile of WES rail stops Path 2 • Within 1/2 mile of frequent service transit • No minimum parking for certain developments Path 3 • Small units, affordable housing, shelters, childcare facilities, treatment facilities CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence WES Station Parking Exclusions II - ' ■■ Q 2040 Metro Analysis Centers Buffer C rJ Transit Center Buffer _ ff �� nr Z A ��1 ME 0 0.25 0.5 rMeV ��■ •14:1 lb % )1* O i3L25 Tigard, Oregon Hall 972 is q ? I ate' ``��ti, •p' cil TjcAR MopS Tigard WHII �,zz3 ;• • 04 i �3.rs�.ai�i i ? '► I; mrd-ar.$a �� y r N ,I op ,,,,, _..... 1,....,:„.„,„,,,2 l II dir„*..� � �w 11 MONTH-St' i ..:_p__ 4 �,, • p4�L1-1 . T' S* ger y4.'2ir 11 =II , 4 = ' (•-••7 y .mt)4,.... op ..7per4ili Ir›. i3 -14Izir 11,, 1 ,. 1.141kAa..1 ,,.. it"§. 11 ';\ 4, .. GAAFIAI:EiST f MCUONA-LO ST— in. Mil'::,\ IR. . \. LI, a ' �� •-BLLMOU IN•RO - -- reBONITA-R.D,: a III� u um 7'1=911 . ice :•11 N �' -11= -� J ► _ " U RHAM Rd —k _ Frequent Transit Lines /.r Parking Exclusions ' /' . Q2040 Metro Analysis Centers Buffer 1� 1� Q Transit Center Buffer :205:40,1 s�� Frequent Transit Lines zi a ' Jill7/1", 7 ®Frequent Transit Lines Buffer Z hl cr.:{ie N o o.as o.s �Mik� ,,,, rod . L �i ,� / ,,�,riddr/f. ' #,!'.1j." Al' . . . 131 25S Hall 61.d ITC ��/-� . J /// �,\F ia. �GA� PS TigIrd,Oregon 97223 . • Q �1'�r 'I' ' • PPP �..I/� TI �A 0..G39 41 71 =� ,,✓ .4 �I+! 4. • I ne,w.v��isu�a S03.igard-or.go, uc.vc° � � /�/? /.. .4 .i . / F. �� I w `'��+� I' '��,,/ X11 �' M ISA �% i ' I/ R.MOurH Si 'air 400 VdlikM 161 IV 11.0"I''' -.Mr 111411111q1 'tiLL'‘ n ■ 4.9M STS 0_a INF r , P = % , rimy e k.-, mt. .„, in 4 l•b- 1N . '- ---1 0 # ,; 0 ,,t,„,,,,,, ... i ... ... :/:;. _. _. ••• . ... ..A. „ .,,,\, 1 .. ., . A i[ It GAARU .'4 '',z,,...,. \\N yS7 AAEUo NALd-S. ci-��. .. ., , / J • Eij qii 1 pi , �� BIJL-L MO•NTA•IN•RU - BON17q�R17,, n 6 re/Je,..,„.,...9 �ml `+ iJ �` 'RPm'� �_= : or' vJ..,-5, lam- %I` ��61* / .,—..._Mor . . �✓rir. 111 4V-14PliF ,DURHAM•R_usD • „� j /J Mal / 4 1 ,//0 Parking Exclusions Citywide AlII 1 IMI Buffers: p i,• Metro Analysis Buller I�a 470,11iffor•- -Transit Center Buffers -FrequentTransit Line Buffers @ II 1 0 0.25 0.5 `f + Mln V 13125 SW H.➢S1.d '�t '� 0 ' � II '� rIGR RPS ,g.aok r2z3 6.y M IN ad 7`,, ,G. w...vunuxs if rio. N s; iriiim ,, _,4 „,. a �� .,,tillivri ;. „.. ! , , . -,,, _ .., 1 ..,„., _. „ .,:- . ,,,,_ . Ili Ilk r L .. - 1 Pir 1' /4,,-*3 -b ,miw 10 ty r, 00,, ..1k, iit ,,,I,T. � �ST h. a MC-UON`Ld — 111 ilo' ,::::,„ A ro-9- 4 1 • � IL! BU IA_M�l1N IN•R•I ��i�i �. . - �i COMRD, 13 ll imarolri a-�JtI Ani-i II_ A imi I DWR•HArM•RD �� __ _ ;;; • II ParkingReform Phase I - Required for Paths 2 and 3 By December 31 , 2022 Path 1 • Reduce parking requirements to no more than 1 k_ space per residential unit citywide Path 2 Path 3 Iig'a rd The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment . Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingReform Phase 2 - Required for Paths 2 and 3 By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • Must allow shared parking k`- ' • Allow parking off-site, up to 2,000 feet away Path 2 • Reduce by parking 1spacefor3kW solar ., .; every • Reduce byspace 1 for each car-sharingspace p Path 3 • Reduce by 2 spaces for every EV charger , tz • Reduce by 1 s ace for two accessible units p every _.1 Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingReform Phase 2 - Required for Paths 2 and 3 By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • Must require parking be unbundled within all transit corridors Path 2 • Within 3/4 mile of WES rail stops • Within 1/2 mile of frequent service transit Pr Path 3 CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingReform Phase 2 - Required for Path 2 By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • Extend parking requirement exemption buffer k_ around 2040 centers from 1/4 mile to 1/2 mile Path 2 • No parking requirements for all transit-oriented development and mixed - use development • No parking requirements for group quarters Path 3 e. • No parking requirements for studios, one irt;01 - bedrooms, and condos in multi - unit development Iigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Parking Exclusions Citywide '1.0.1 ., . 2940 Metro Centers 114 mile Buffer at Hi I 2940 Metro Centers 112 mile Buffer de° 0 i j r.rte■ N o 0.25 0.5 VII -la I 1160L. 13125 SWH.➢Blvd IMO �.r•h. Millibl �� 0 TOGA TRPS 15g1.3,°7:7"3 ; ., 4 ¢ Fi` . ■ y 7 w.wilgvtdot .9 a S F_ AMS N 4" CaD A ..Agromi ul „. .,-,-- '40zikxrat'. 63 . I 1 ,� e �� ,yyPL� 1 HI,4 r=� lrr �, R,F I II m .__d.1011 MEM oso MIS =JEg 4110001 A ..; Anyargip 1 ,ILII -_ irc . • "GAARdE•STInk MCDONAL•U Si7 igi` b. '''=13.101i901.12.114.91"- ,,,,, �•1 � 1i ? i rr � iIEO_ 1B •ITA-RU,r a �~ -im , ! JIii7TL I= .11 ij gibi DU•HAM•RD him 1111 -L. , Fi :% 1.11 A A....11kx, IN - ,, 11 .: f � r Parking Exclusions Citywide 1 ;LiM All Buffers: !• -MetroAnalysis 1/2 mile Buffer alt f -Transit Center Buffers C7 j ' �— -FrequentTransit Line Buffers . 0 0.25 0.5 - m !,'J. .:.= Mln 1101111 " 11 13125 SW 14.11 Blvd li will- , ;,;~� ,G rIGR��RPS ,g.aok x223 7 ��:� e ._., . ti; ,4 w_ilgatdot so3.e3s.alrl ¢ ti .P mu w illim, .i.drir -As. .,...... lot ,- , s t. (111 A tri . 4,,\ --:'ilif..,--1 1 , ;4'7)4. .0-- IF tz -_,. ...-a-, ,_ ,r, r_, . ,...„ : 1 \bv • A up 1,,,..,,,. . ;___1.-. /al MEM 01 a 1 ,,,,, - . ' '. ,.. a. . 0 I 111' Non . ;,,. — I, . _. 1 I NI -GARS — r MEdONALU - 1++ i RW J ` 'y a : — - -iiiBULL MOLIN AIN=RO, ,. i: �� _—BO ITA RUL. 1 11 '' Ilk! ailli, d i'ION II ., ,,,,,„ II f q J ,,,,, ,1 .. J� isX1 1_61 1 1it i ParkingReform Phase 2 - Required for Path 2 By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • No parking requirements for redevelopment of buildings vacant for two ears or more y Path 2 • No parking requirements for changes of use or redevelopment • No parking requirements for additions of 30% or Path 3 less in building area CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingReform Phase 2 - Required for Path 2 By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • No parking requirements for historic buildings k_ • Noarkin requirements for commercial _ p g q Path 2 properties with 10 employees or less or 3,000 square feet or less ` • No parking requirements for buildings constructed Path 3 under the Oregon Reach Code tz • No parking requirements for LEED buildings _ Iig'a rd The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingReform Phase 2 - Required for Path 2 By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • No parking requirements for schools • No parking requirements for bars and taverns Path 2 Path 3 CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Parking Exclusions Citywide Al Buffers: — ,,,le -Metro Analysis 1/2 mile Buffer -Transit Center Buffers r -FrequentTransit Line Buffers ft- f`- 0 CC -MUE-1 • (7 �� jig -CG -MUE-2 Q C-N I=MUR-1r � ti 11%x-7 UM .4 % p MUR-2 1_]I-H p PR AEI L]I-L p RES-A lag , all ' ' - ;i! Q I-P p RES-f3 mNO 11•111 �� ►rte- tii "0 MLI-CBD n RES-C 3 Q �I "�� I a�.14f""{.. _ .P 4 Muc I—IREs-D = V VER •t, -MUC-1 -RES-E =M -mil N �P J p ME -TMU , ^a o �1:. r 1‘ D D25 D.5 Ill \� �' . Mike �'^=+L+IlW C7� 13125 SW Hill Hl.d ..#• L li f 5, {fy� V Y/moi R I Iged,Dicgcm 97223 I }. r �; (5 TGR MSPS 503.cas..,.. ��.�� i , s. -= _.,_:- �T1Sy iv, ... 1044 1 r lj 1 r IIN Al Am. ��4 �� a A •'►* q ■r Ilk m It 11114 "�Gq�A�R d( r _ J—+ a MCDONALD-S7= — III : �� 4 + 0 f •, a FA—...., f ■ 13� BOA ITA RU;.—o MEL MOLINTAIN.RO x jilt ail sof lii t r �I my ULIRHA' l !Jgra... 1 —.gal �nt� 1 Parking Exclusions A Citywide + Al Buffers: -Metro Analysis 1/2 mile Buffer -Transit Center Buffers w` Frequent Transit Line Buffers 0 id C �� V. EAU 7 -C-C PR t\217 In MI-C-G I I RES-A y 1 � • �' IV ' 0 C-N I—I RES-B .■ IC-P ET RES-C it' I. ItiL y 1111 , i . ■.■ �� 0 1-L I—I RES-D ¢ ' a - aF 11..P��4,e rliC 0 I-P I—I RES-E xr 1 4 }f r mt.VI N I N o 0.as 0.s ti #` ?�AQyj• "� Nillir'O'er n kIllta. ♦ Rp II �o ur H st. TIGAR �4 11g,.a oKgon m333 � •13125 SW PT211131,d ��I.r " ---- 114 f '0 503.634.4191 ` �J1 "rad====_--- , M g.ae..�. ricwao ■ `�jtaV� ' 4► }6 HL �{ --‘r---- ,..__ 15PF 11.1„, ,,,.., ii ..... S LR.`\\ I~ I� IOW II o 1g r 44 I/ witisli.40, i .3>-: rt ,'=GAA-RDE=S7 I \ rp ��` ( �` a MBdONAL=d 57 — - ., ., til • Bl1EL MOUNT 0 ��; B� ITA-RU —o DU•HAM Rd mg — lim.it ti - .,, 1 , ; f � +i an Impact of Geographic Exclusions - Paths 2 and 3 Excluded Totals • 62% of city excluded from minimum parking requirements • Including : • All mixed -used districts: Triangle, WaSq, Downtown • All of Heavy Industrial Zone • Most of Light Industrial and Industrial Park • CITYOF • Most of General Commercial Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Impact of Geographic Exclusions - Paths 2 and 3 What Could Be Regulated • 38% of city where parking requirements are allowed is overwhelmingly zone Residential • Even within this area, parking requirements would very limited for most housing types e CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingReform Phase 2 - Required for Path 3 By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • Unbundlearkin for residential units p g • Unbundle leased commercial parking Path2 • Require a flexible commute benefit for businesses with more than 50 employees 14,0 • Adopt a tax on parking lot revenue Path 3 M. • Require no more than 1/2 space per unit for I housing other than singlele detached houses I•gTaOrd - - The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence ParkingReform Phase 2 - Required for Path 1 By June 30, 2023 Path 1 • Remove all minimumarkin requirements p g Path 2 kit& Path 3 CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence Why Are These Rules Needed? Nationally, transportation creates Figure 5.Statewide sector-based greenhouse gas emissions:1990-2016 about 27% of total U .S . 80 greenhouse gas emissions. 0 70 uo 0 60 H U 50 From 1990 to 2020, transportation E, . emissions increased more than 30 20 any other sector. 10I I I 10 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 In Oregon , transportation creates Agriculture Industrial Residential &Commercial ■Transportation 40% of GHG emissions. Source:DEO,2018 Why Are These Rules Needed? As a state, we are Climate Pollution Change (Light Duty Vehicles) 4 fa missing greenhouse gas ° We are here reduction and climate 20% 1 mitigation targets. 0% 1970 2010 20 i 24. 0 The climate crisis is -20% worsening and acute _40% Where we're headed GAF action is needed. (Trends, Plans, Investments) ' —I Oregon's adopted vision \ CLIMATE& ENVIRONMENT? -60% (Statewide Transportation Strategy) The world needs to cut its emissions seven times as fast to hit climate -80 goals, U.N. report finds "We're just so far off track,"says one co-author,callingforbolderand more 10o urgent action from major emitters. VV By Brady Dennis r E Climate Impacts Are Reals. 2020 Oregon wildfires led to total loss of four towns, the deaths of 11 Oregonians, loss of over 5,000 homes and 0. g ga . - . businesses, displacement of thousands of people in the --__ y - midst of a pandemic, and destruction of over 1,200,000 acres . , . , t �'' `` of forest, at a total estimated cost of over $1.15 billion. 2020 flooding in Northeast Oregon led to the death of -- �:_- „= - - one Oregonian, hundreds of millions in damages, and the closure of one of the state's two major interstate corridors, impacting commerce and travel. 11111;16 m 'olik 2021 heat wave lasting more than three days led to the deaths of at least 116 Oregonians in what Multnomah County officials described as a "mass casualty event". all Equity mpactsI Homeownership Rate by .Bl ■Whitu Research by Portland State University's Dr. 2% 8g. 79.5% 4.8 Vivek Shandas and others shows that the ' ` 69.E impacts of extreme weather and climate , 52.456 change are disproportionately borne by 35.9% communities of color. 29.1% Transportation systems have Less than$25,0OO $25,000-$50,000 $50,000-$100,000 5100,000-$150.000 $15O.00Oormere disproportionately impacted communities of color displacing and dividing them and URBAN'INSTITUTE , i Scarce;341JAmerlcan Gommunity Survey, creating unhealthy living conditions. Nationally, 71.9% of white households own homes 41.8% of Black households own homes Updated Land Use and Transportation Rules Land Use/Building Transportation • Designate walkable • Plan for high quality pedestrian, climate-friendly areas bicycle, and transit infrastructure • Reform parking management • Remove sole focus on motor • Support electric vehicle vehicle congestion standards charging • Prioritize projects meeting climate/equity outcomes CITY OF Tigard The 5 E's —Tigard's Community Promise: Equity • Environment • Economy • Engagement • Excellence AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: December 13, 2022 TESTIMONY SIGN-UP SHEETS Please sign on the following page(s) if you wish to testify before the City Council on: Public Hearing: Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities Required Parking Reform This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Due to Time Constraints City Council May Impose A Time Limit on Testimony AGENDA ITEM No. 6 Date: December 13, 2022 PLEASE PRINT This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony become part of the public record and is openly available to all members of the public. The names and addresses ofpersons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. Proponent—(Speaking In Favor) Opponent—(Speaking Against) Neutral Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. Name,Address&Phone No. AIS-5073 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 12/13/2022 Length (in minutes):40 Minutes Agenda Title: Presentation of External Financial Audit by Moss Adams Authored By: Eric Kang Presented By: Eric Kang Item Type: Public Hearing Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE Present to the City Council the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) along with other related communication and results from the external financial audit for the city and the Tigard Town Center Development Agency for the fiscal ear ending June 30, 2022. The presentation may include recommendations for opportunities for improvement noted by Moss Adams during the course of the audit. ACTION REQUESTED No action required. Management, and the external auditors from Moss Adams will present the ACFR and results from the audit to council. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Oregon Revised Statutes 297.425 requires that every city publish a complete set of financial statements presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted by a firm of licensed certified public accountants. Moss Adams,the city's external audit firm,performed an audit of the city's financial operations for fiscal year ending June 30, 2022. They reported their findings to the Audit Committee on December 1, 2022. Their reports are included in the city's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and the TCDA financial report,which will be finalized and delivered to the council December 13, 2022. Moss Adams will provide an overview of audit procedures performed and highlight areas with opportunities for improvement or best practices. The documents associated with this agenda item will be sent to the council prior to the council meeting. These documents are still to be finalized and will be completed by the city and auditors on December 13, 2022.They include the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the year ended June 30,2022, the Tigard Town Center Development Agency financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2022, the letter from the auditor to "Those Charged with Governance", and the auditor's presentation. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION N/A ADDITIONAL RESOURCES N/A Attachments FY22 Audit Results 0 MOSSADAMS CityTigardof l June 30, 2022 Audit Results lire" December 13, 2022 - - -_ - - - -�_ a YOUR DEDICATED TEAV c . - ® 600, 4F KEITH SIMOVIC KEVIN MULLERLEILE HARVEY WANG Engagement Reviewer Concurring Reviewer Audit Manager And Partner Nature Services Provided0 1 Independent Auditors' Report on the 2 Assistance with, and technical government wide and fund financial review of the City's ACFR for statements of the City of Tigard. compliance with GAAP as well as GFOA Certificate of Excellence requirements ® Report of Independent Auditors' on Disclosures and Independent Internal Control Over Financial 4 Auditors' Comments Required by the v Reporting and on Compliance in Minimum Standards for Audits of Accordance with Government Oregon Municipal Corporations Auditing Standards Independent Auditors' Report on the government wide and fund financial Communication to Those Charged statements of the Town Center with Governance Development Agency Audit Process 0 zo-/- Hn C Internal Controls Analytical Procedures Substantive Procedures 0 4 - Includes IT - Revenue and expenses -Confirm account balances - Revenues / cash receipting -Trends, comparisons, and -Vouch to supporting -Cash disbursements expectations documentation - Payroll - Representations from -Capital assets attorneys and management - Financial close & reporting - Examine objective evidence 0 Audit Opinion/ Reports Government Oregon Financial Auditing Minimum Audit Single Audit Statements Standards Standards Report Report Report Unmodified No findings Compliance findings American Rescue (clean) opinion noted — see Plan Act program - on financial subsequent slides to be completed statement subsequent to the issuance of the ACFR Required Communication Auditor's responsibility under auditing standards Significant accounting policies — adoption of GASB 87 Management judgments & accounting estimates Audit adjustments — none noted 0 Management's consultation with other accountants 6 No disagreements with management No difficulties in performing the audit Audit observations and recommendations — No material weaknesses noted Findings and Best Practices BEST PRACTICES • Cash controls • Formally document the review and approval of the City's year end cash and investments by fund worksheet. (repeat comment) 0 • Investments in the local government investment pool (LGIP) • ORS 294.810 limits the amount a local government can invest in the LGIP, which is adjusted each year by the State Treasury. We recommend the City monitor the limits and adjust the amounts invested with the LGIP to be in compliance with ORS 294.810. Findings and Best Practices BEST PRACTICES • Investment of funds • ORS 294.035 limits the types of investments that a local government can invest in, including setting a limit for the rating of those investments by Moody's, S&P and Fitch. At June 30, 2022, the City invested in certain 0 corporate bonds that were below the State of Oregon requirements. • IT change management policy • Recommend management to adopt a formal change management policy to guide future system changes. (repeat comment) • Procurement • Recommend the City to provide ongoing training to procurement staff on documentation requirements of sole sourced contracts in accordance with ORS 2976.075. Acknowledgements Thank you Cindy Trimp, Eric Kang, Amy Lawson, Debbie Smith- Wagar, and staff for their excellent facilitation of the audit process. The audit progressed on time and in an orderly fashion; all requested 0 schedules and draft financial statements were received on a timely basis. All personnel across all departments were courteous, responsive, and fulfilled all our requests in a timely manner. 'Tone at the Top' and attitude from management was one of helpfulness, candor, and openness in response to audit requests and discussion points. X % + - X % + - X % + - X % + - X + - X % + - X % + - X % + - X % + X % + - X % + -- X % + -- X % + - X % + - X % + - X % + - X % + - X % + - + - X % + - >< % + - >< % + - X % + X % + - X % + + - x % + - X i! + - X i! + - X % + - X % + - X % + - X % + - X % + - X X % + - X % + - X % + - X % + - X MOSSADAMS % + - X % + - x % + - x % + - x % + X % + - x % + - x % + - x % + - x Thank