The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 10/25/2022 ligCity of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting—Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND OCTOBER 25,2022- 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting Revised 10/24/2022-Agenda Item TIME: No. 7 will be rescheduled. MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid-City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223-See PUBLIC NOTICE below PUBLIC NOTICE:In accordance with the City of Tigard's Safety Plan related to COVID-19 and Oregon House Bill 4212,this will be a hybrid meeting where some Council,staff or public will participate in person and some will participate remotely. How to comment: •Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments before noon the day of the meeting. •If attending the meeting in person,please fill out the public comment sign-in sheet at the front of the room and come to the microphone when your name is called. •If you prefer to call in,please call 503-966-4101 when instructed to be placed in the queue.We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to three minutes. •You may comment through video through the Teams app. Go to this link to learn how to participate by video: October 25,2022 Council Meeting (https://www.tigard-or.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/1816/372). Upon request,the City will also endeavor to arrange for the following services: • Qualified sign language interpreters for persons with speech or hearing impairments;and • Qualified bilingual interpreters. Since these services must be scheduled with outside service providers,it is important to allow as much lead time as possible. Please notify the City of your need by 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday preceding the meeting by calling: 503-718-2419 (voice) or 503-684-2772 (TDD -Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf). SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM ONLINE:https://www.tigard-or.gov/boxcast CABLE VIEWERS:The City Council meeting will be shown live on Channel 28 at 6:30 p.m.The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Saturday 7:30 p.m. Sunday 11:30 a.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. " City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL AND LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND OCTOBER 25,2022- 6:30 p.m. Business Meeting Revised 10/24/2022-Agenda TIME: Item No. 7 will be rescheduled. MEETING LOCATION: Hybrid-City of Tigard-Town Hall- 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 6:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITION 3. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment B. Tigard High School Student Envoy C. Public Comment—Written D. Public Comment—In Person E. Public Comment—Phone-In F. Public Comment—Video 4. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board)The Consent Agenda is used for routine items including approval of meeting minutes,contracts or intergovernmental agreements. Information on each item is available on the city's website in the packet for this meeting. These items may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Council members may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. A. Local Contract Review Board: 1. MIDDLE HOUSING REVOLVING LOAN FUND CONTRACT • Consent Agenda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 5. PUBLIC HEARING:ADOPTING WATER SDC UPDATES 6:45 p.m. estimated time 6. GOAL 3: CLIMATE AND COMMUNITY RESILIENCE. PATH TO CARBON NEUTRALITY BRIEFING 7:00 p.m. estimated time 7. COUNCIL GOAL 1 UPDATE This agenda item will be rescheduled to a future meeting date. 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 8:00 p.m. estimated time 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council may go into Executive Session.If an Executive Session is called to order,the appropriate ORS citation will be announced identifying the applicable statute.All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions,as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed.No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 11. ADJOURNMENT 8:05 p.m. estimated time �I 11,1 -� . • TIGARD Public Comments received by noon for the October 25, 2022 Meeting of the Tigard City Council 1. Robert Ruedy 10/25/2022 In opposition of allowing Urban Farming, Agriculture & Livestock within the City of Tigard City Limits October 25, 2022 To: The Tigard City Council Subject: The City of Tigard Development Code Amendment Urban/Agriculture(DCA2022- 00003) Position: Written Testimony in opposition of allowing Urban Farming, Agriculture & Livestock within the City of Tigard City Limits Dear City Council Members and Mayor Snider; My personal position and observations over my past 30+ years of property Ownership and Residency in this fine City is that we have enough Urban "nuisance" challenges currently with Domesticated Cats and Dogs, Barn Cats, Ferrule Animals, Wild Coyotes & Foxes, Raccoons, Squirrels & Chipmunk's, Possums, Mice, Rats, Compost Piles, Invasive Species, and Hazard Trees. So why make the "Urban" environment less livable with Farming, Agriculture, and Livestock when we primarily live within 20 feet of each other. There was a time when Urban Farms meant "Vegetable Gardens of 2,000 SF or less & one or two Fruit Trees with possibly a Rose garden." So why complicate our lives further then this simplicity? Now don't get me wrong, I think "farming" is great... on Farmland and Agriculturally EFU (Effective Farm Use) Zoned parcels locally. But the "Urban" environment is not "Farmland" (EFU Zoned) and therefore should have strict limitations to just growing vegetables, fruits, flowers, and other non-noisy or unpleasant "stench" producing products such as "urban life" types of flora and fauna, and most certainly not livestock, poultry, or otherwise "farmland" type animals, bees, etc. So let's take this matter a bit closer to home. Put yourselves in these "shoes" and mindset please: How are each of you on the Tigard City Council, including the Mayor Snider, going to feel when the neighbor next to, or behind, your personal property, investment, and humble abode, who may not even be the Owner of that property, decides to "Urban Farm" 40 chickens, 5 pigs, 2 Llamas, 8 goats, 4 sheep, 26 rabbits, 6 bee hives, and all their noises, unpleasant and pervasive stench, and potential ancillary personal health hazards such as bee stings and/or their harassment, rats, or otherwise during outdoor dining, entertaining guests, or simply trying to live in your own personal space? Imagine trying to enjoy your own backyard individually or with guests, with overwhelming noise, the stench of pooh, and bees hovering within your yard. Imagine living in this type of environment as a stay-at-home "Remote Worker", or"Home Schooling" parent with kids playing in the yard, some whom may have bee sting allergies. This is a ridiculous scenario to have to endure for anyone or any family, and your and their property values will very likely suffer accordingly, along with your and other neighbors within blocks. And what about the related reduced City Taxation revenues of decreased property values? Isn't that a concern of yours? I feel so sorry for those directly impacted by such selfish infringement by others. Imagine having Written Testimony for DCA2022-00003 Page 1 of 2 to take the financial "hit"just to move away from such an unpleasant scenario which currently exists within our City, simply to maintain your sanity and financial "nest-egg" of most folk's largest asset. My request within this testimony is simple... that the City Council Vote down this subject amendment and instead work to eliminate the un-pleasantries of all so-called "urban"farming, agriculture, and livestock that is way more than a "hobby." If you've got 40 chickens, that's a "business", not a hobby for personal protein. And why does this example or any other form of Urban Commercial or Non-commercial Agricultural or Livestock for that matter, even belong in the "Urban" environment? I just don't get it... but it does seem to reflect a perception of a "pretty selfish of the few to impact the many" mentality. So within this Written Testimony I'm pleading with you to please remain focused on the City of Tigard motto of "Tigard - A Place to Call Home", to not become "Tigard - The Place to Avoid Coming Home To..." Respectfully submitted, - Robert (Rob) Ruedy 14185 SW 100th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Cell: Written Testimony for DCA2022-00003 Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 C - PUBLIC COMMENT DATE: October 25, 2022 (Limited to 3 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and cities of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. meq/ t/ jer1<__ -s1 6tt 6 '4_,/ 2 NAME & CITY YOU LIVE IN TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name Crfi' .r' d -^47 City 1i,% 1-CTI Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the, �j G'�" �S � � presiding officer pion once: •—ip , f/ f -r-t2;_ev H---,1.._ ,q----r-E__ (2- _ ,,,,,,,,-,0 Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zi Phone no. or email Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City __ State Zip Phone no. or email AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 C - PUBLIC COMMENT DATE: October 25, 2022 (Limited to 3 minutes or less,please) The Council wishes to hear from you on other issues not on the agenda and items on the agenda, but asks that you first try to resolve your concerns through staff. This is a City of Tigard public meeting, subject to the State of Oregon's public meeting and records laws. All written and oral testimony becomes part of the public record. The names and addresses of persons who attend or participate in City of Tigard public meetings will be included in the meeting minutes, which is a public record. NAME,ADDRESS & PHONE TOPIC STAFF Please Print CONTACTED Name Ke 8 oivk{ ✓ City?t 9Cc,,,i Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the 60a 3 presiding officer pronounce: C (� Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email Name City Also,please spell your name as it sounds,if it will help the presiding officer pronounce: Optional: If you want a response from staff please leave your contact information: Address City State Zip Phone no. or email AIS-4992 4.A. 1. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 10/25/2022 Length(in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Middle Housing Revolving Loan Fund Contract Authored By: Schuyler Warren Presented By: Schuyler Warren Item Type: Motion Requested Resolution Local Contract Review Board Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE In its meeting on December 7,2021,the Tigard City Council allocated$1.5 million of the city's American Rescue Plan Act funds to create the city's first middle housing development fund and directed staff to begin work to develop the program.This program,the first of its kind in the state,would provide approximately$4.5 million in pre-development and construction lending for middle housing developments that agree to certain energy efficiency and affordability criteria. Entering into a contract with Craft3,Community Housing Fund,and Network for Oregon Affordable Housing to manage the fund requires Local Contract Review Board (LCRB) consideration and approval. ACTION REQUESTED Award the Contract in the amount of$1,500,000 and direct the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the Contract. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The purpose of this loan fund is threefold:to incentivize the creation of more affordable housing units in the city,to build capacity and knowledge of middle housing construction in the development community,and to demonstrate to the broader market-rate lender the viability of this housing type in the market. This fund builds on and is a continuation of the city's ongoing work to promote greater housing diversity,which began in 2018 with the adoption of the Phase II Housing Options project. It is clear from that work that despite the removal of regulatory barriers,other external barriers remain,including land availability and institutional knowledge withing the development community.However,the most significant barrier to realizing middle housing projects is construction financing.Perhaps not surprisingly,lending institutions are skeptical of what appears to them as an untested and unproven housing product with an as-yet-unknown level of market demand. The financing product that enables most development is known as a bridge loan or construction loan.These short-term loans fund the materials and labor to build commercial or residential properties.At construction close,the properties are either sold to pay off the loan or are refinanced based on the value of the improvements through a conventional mortgage product. Construction loans can be riskier for lenders,as they typically have low or no collateral associated with the loan in the event of a default. For this reason,lenders are more reluctant to finance unknown products. In addition,it is difficult for smaller developers with less experience and demonstrated history of development success to access construction lending. The program approved by Council will create a revolving loan fund to provide short-term construction lending to developers constructing middle housing.Because the loan period is typically only one to two years,the fund would be capable of supporting multiple developments within a short span of time. In exchange for being provided the loan,the developer would agree to certain terms.The first would be an agreement to offer a minimum of 30 percent of the units to buyers participating in community land trust(CLT) or other affordable homeownership down payment assistance programs.Under the CLT model,there is no affordability period,the affordability is truly permanently protected,making the investment one that pays off for generations. There are fortunately existing models that make the administration of this type of program quick,efficient,and sustainable. Community Development Funding Institutions (CDFIs) are mission-based non-profits that provide lending to help low-income,low-wealth,and other disadvantaged people and communities join the economic mainstream. The City of Tigard has convened the three CDFIs working in the affordable housing sector in this region and received an agreement that they will work to administer this program as a consortium.This builds on their standing cooperative relationship managing a multi-million dollar Chase grant as a consortium. This consortium is uniquely positioned to bring the appropriate experience,knowledge,and capacity to manage this type of construction lending and developer support specific to affordable housing.While other CDFIs exist regionally, they are either focused on other types of lending(business,education,capacity,etc.) or do not have the appropriate experience with providing support for affordable housing developers. In addition,by working as a consortium,the three CDFIs will be capable of leveraging a higher loan fund capacity than any one CDFI working alone would be capable of doing. Each consortium partner similarly brings specific local knowledge,affordable housing experience,or business support capacity that any one CDFI alone could not provide. Finally,the expertise and knowledge afforded the consortium by their previous grant work together uniquely positions them to better manage this type of fund. •Community Housing Fund (CHF),a local CDFI specializing in funding for regulated affordable housing has a longstanding relationship with the City of Tigard and has participated as a lender on the construction of most of the city's affordable housing units. •Network for Oregon Affordable Housing(NOAH)was established in 1990 as a mission-driven statewide lender working to solve Oregon's housing affordability crisis.NOAH provides an array of financial tools,including pre-development,bridge,and permanent loans,as well as technical assistance to borrowers.With total assets exceeding$130 million,NOAH supports the acquisition,renovation,and construction of affordable housing properties throughout the state. •Craft3 is a local CDFI specializing in commercial lending and more recently,Accessory Dwelling Unit financing. Craft3 aided in administering the city's Tigard CARES program lending to businesses impacted by the COVID pandemic. Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations December 7,2021 - Council allocation of$1.5 million from ARPA funds Public Involvement Developer and non-profit affordable housing stakeholder focus group. Impacts (Community, Budget,Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goal 10.1 Policy 5 -The City shall continue to develop,dedicate,and administer funding resources (such as the Construction Excise Tax and others) to support affordable housing for rental and homeownership,including new construction and preservation of existing affordable housing. Policy 8-The City shall provide opportunity for a mix and range of housing types and sizes in all low-and medium-density residential areas,including single detached houses,accessory dwelling units,quads,cottage clusters, courtyard units,and rowhouses. Policy 10-The City shall enact policies that provide for equitable housing opportunity without discrimination or disparity based on tenure,familial status,or household composition of the occupants of any type of housing Policy 11 -The City shall provide opportunity for a mix and range of housing types and sizes in all low-and medium-density residential areas,including single detached houses,accessory dwelling units,quads,cottage clusters, courtyard units,and rowhouses. Action Measure ii-Provide incentives to encourage affordable middle housing development in low-and medium-density residential areas throughout the city,including in areas of new development and redevelopment. Tigard Housing Needs Analysis •Strategy 9-Lending Programs for Affordable Middle Housing •Middle Housing Recommendation-Develop a City-Supported Loan Program for Small Housing Types -Using CET funds,affordable housing bonds,or other funding,the City could fund a revolving short-term construction or bridge loan fund for small developers building affordable or market-rate middle housing who are not otherwise able to access more conventional forms of financing. Tigard Affordable Housing Plan Strategy 12.B-Provide grants or low-interest loans for specific development or rehabilitation projects ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the LCRB approve the contract award in alignment with the recommendations of the adopted Tigard Housing Needs Analysis and the Tigard Affordable Housing Plan. The LCRB may choose to not award this contract. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Attachments No file(s)attached. AIS-5016 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 10/25/2022 Length(in minutes): 15 Minutes Agenda Title: Public Hearing:Adopting Water SDC Updates Authored By: Samantha Rico Presented By: Item Type: Resolution Public Hearing Public Hearing Yes Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: 08/25/2022 Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The City Council will hold a public hearing and consider the resolution updating the water system development charge methodology. ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends the City Council hold the public hearing and approve the Resolution (Attachment 1) to adopt the new water SDC methodology. BACKGROUND INFORMATION System Development Charges (SDCs) are one-time fees charged on new development,and certain types of redevelopments,to help pay for existing and planned infrastructure to serve the development.Under ORS 223.297- 223.314,SDCs may be used for capital improvements for water supply,treatment,and distribution.There are two types of SDCs,an improvement fee and a reimbursement fee,that can be imposed on a property at the time of increased usage of the system or initial connection to the water system. SDCs are an important component of utility management because they help to mitigate the cost of growth in the system and distribute the costs to all applicable parties (current and future users of the water system).The City has historically assessed system development charges,and as a routine business practice,undergoes rate studies to evaluate the inputs and update those SDCs. Council adopted the 2020 Water System Plan on December 8,2020.The 2020 Water System Plan provides recommendations for specific projects for inclusion in the water utility Capital Improvement Program (CIP),including preliminary cost estimates.As a best practice,the projects identified in the Water System Plan are used to form the basis of the analysis. The City's consultant has completed a water system development charge update. Prior to this,the last SDC study was conducted by the City in 2010,following the 2010 Water System Plan update. The Water Advisory Board received the informational presentation regarding the water SDC methodology update on October 12,2022. Dates of Previous and Potential Future Considerations August 23,2022—Council received a presentation from the City's consultant on the water system development charge update. Public Involvement In accordance with ORS 223.304 guidelines,interested parties were notified directly 90 days in advance of the public hearing and provided a copy of the report 60 days in advance.The public hearing notice and report were also made available to the public on the City's website within the ORS notification guidelines. Impacts (Community, Budget,Policies and Plans/Strategic Connection) SDCs help address the additional demands on the water system created by growth in our community. Collecting water system development charges ensures that existing improvements and future capacity enhancing capital projects are distributed and new growth pays an equitable share. If Council approves the methodology update, staff recommends the new rates go into effect with the next regularly scheduled Master Fees and Charges update on July 1,2023. ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION The council could choose to not approve the Resolution and provide staff with other direction. Staff recommends approval of the Resolution. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES • Attachments Resolution (Attachment 1) Water SDC Report (Exhibit A) CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 22- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING WATER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDC) METHODOLOGY WHEREAS, Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 establishes the authority and process for imposing water SDCs;and WHEREAS,this chapter of the code also specifies SDC methodology shall be adopted by resolution;and WHEREAS,water SDCs were last updated twelve years ago,in 2010;and WHEREAS, since that time,the council adopted the Water System Plan in December of 2020;and WHEREAS,the city recently prepared a Water System Development Charge Study;and WHEREAS, adopting the updated SDC methodology outlined in the study will allow the use of SDC revenues to fund council-approved water capital projects identified in the Water System Plan;and WHEREAS, as required by state statute, a 90-day notice of intent to update the water SDCs was sent to interested parties,and the methodology was available for public review at least 60 days prior to this meeting. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby adopts the water SDC methodology as outlines in the Water System Development Charge Study attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2: All previous water SDC methodology, including the methodology approved in Resolution No. 10-59, is hereby replaced with the SDC methodology outlined in the attached Water System Development Charges Study dated August 24,2022. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2022. Mayor- Citi-of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 22- Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL PACKET CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON FOR OCTOBER 25, 2022 TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ITEM 5 RESOLUTION NO. 22- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING WATER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDC) METHODOLOGY WHEREAS, Tigard Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 establishes the authority and process for imposing water SDCs; and WHEREAS,this chapter of the code also specifies SDC methodology shall be adopted by resolution;and WHEREAS,water SDCs were last updated twelve years ago,in 2010; and WHEREAS, since that time,the council adopted the Water System Plan in December of 2020; and WHEREAS,the city recently prepared a Water System Development Charge Study;and WHEREAS, adopting the updated SDC methodology outlined in the study will allow the use of SDC revenues to fund council-approved water capital projects identified in the Water System Plan; and WHEREAS, as required by state statute, a 90-day notice of intent to update the water SDCs was sent to interested parties,and the methodology was available for public review at least 60 days prior to this meeting. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby adopts the water SDC methodology as outlines in the Water System Development Charge Study attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 2: All previous water SDC methodology, including the methodology approved in Resolution No. 10-71, is hereby replaced with the SDC methodology outlined in the attached Water System Development Charges Study dated August 24,2022. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2022. Mayor- City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder- City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO. 22- Page 1 CityTigardof WATER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 06. CHARGE UPDATE Draft Report August 24, 2022 Washington 7525 166th Avenue NE,Ste.D215 Redmond,WA 98052 425.867.1802 Oregon 5335 Meadows Road,Ste 330 Lake Oswego,OR 97035 503.841.6543 Colorado PO Box 19114 Boulder,CO 80301-9998 719.284.9168 www.fcsgroup.com This entire report is made of readily recyclable materials,including bronze wire binding and theront ad back cover, ♦. FCS V which are made from post-consumer recycled plastic bottles. Solutions-Oriented Consulting City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ii Section I. Introduction 1 I.A. Project 1 I.B. Policy 1 Section II. SDC Analysis 3 II.A. Growth 3 II.B. Improvement Fee 4 II.C. Reimbursement Fee 5 II.D. Calculated SDC 6 •FCS GROUP City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page 1 Section I . INTRODUCTION This section describes the project scope and policy context upon which the body of this report is based. I.A. PROJECT The City of Tigard(City) imposes a system development charge (SDC) to provide partial funding for the capital needs of its water system. The current SDC is charged based on the size of the meter necessary for a new service, measured in terms of meter capacity equivalents (MCEs). The rate is currently $10,853 for one MCE, which is the typical charge for a single-family residence. In 2020, the City and Murraysmith completed a new Water System Plan. Also in 2020, the City engaged FCS GROUP to update the City's water SDC based on the capital and capacity needs of the water system identified by the new plan. I.B. POLICY SDCs are enabled by state statutes, authorized by local ordinance, and constrained by the United States Constitution. I.B.1 . State Statutes Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 223.297 to 223.314 enable local governments to establish SDCs, which are one-time fees on development that are paid at the time of development or redevelopment that creates additional demand for water facilities. SDCs are intended to recover a fair share of the cost of existing and planned facilities that provide capacity to serve future users -- growth. ORS 223.299 defines two types of SDC: • A reimbursement fee that is designed to recover "costs associated with capital improvements already constructed, or under construction when the fee is established, for which the local government determines that capacity exists" • An improvement fee that is designed to recover"costs associated with capital improvements to be constructed" ORS 223.304(1) states, in part, that a reimbursement fee must be based on"the value of unused capacity available to future system users or the cost of existing facilities" and must account for prior contributions by existing users and any gifted or grant-funded facilities. The calculation must "promote the objective of future system users contributing no more than an equitable share to the •:4FCS GROUP City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page 2 cost of existing facilities." A reimbursement fee may be spent on any capital improvement related to the system for which it is being charged(whether cash-financed or debt-financed). ORS 223.304(2) states, in part, that an improvement fee must be calculated to include only the cost of projected capital improvements needed to increase system capacity for future users. In other words, the cost of planned projects that correct existing deficiencies or that do not otherwise increase capacity for future users may not be included in the improvement fee calculation. An improvement fee may be spent only on capital improvements (or portions thereof) that increase the capacity of the system for which it is being charged (whether cash-financed or debt-financed). In addition to the reimbursement and improvement fees, ORS 223.307(5) states, in part, that "system development charge revenues may be expended on the costs of complying" with state statutes concerning SDCs, including "the costs of developing system development charge methodologies and providing an annual accounting of system development charge expenditures." 1.13.2. Local Ordinance Chapter 3.24 of the Tigard Municipal Code authorizes and governs the imposition and expenditure of water SDCs in Tigard. I.B.3. United States Constitution The United States Supreme Court has determined that SDCs, impact fees, or other exactions that comply with state and/or local law may still violate the United States Constitution if they are not proportionate to the impact of the development. The SDCs calculated in this report are designed to meet all constitutional and statutory requirements. •:4FCS GROUP City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page 3 Section II . SDC ANALYSIS This section provides the detailed calculations of the maximum allowable water SDC. In general, SDCs are calculated by adding a reimbursement fee component and an improvement fee component—both with potential adjustments. Each component is calculated by dividing the eligible cost by growth in units of demand. The unit of demand becomes the basis of the charge. Below is an illustration of this calculation: Maximum Allowable Reimbursement Improvement System Fee Fee Development Charge Eligible cost of Eligible cost of unused capacity planned capacity in existing increasing facilities facilities per unit of demand Growth in system Growth in system demand demand II.A. GROWTH The calculation of projected growth begins with defining the units by which current and future demand will be measured. Then, using the best available data, we quantify the current level of demand and estimate a future level of demand. The difference between the current level and the future level is the growth in demand that will serve as the denominator in the SDC calculations. Unit of Measurement A good unit of measurement allows an agency to quantify the incremental demand of development or redevelopment that creates additional demand for water facilities. A better unit of measurement allows an agency to distinguish different levels of demand added by different kinds of development or redevelopment. For water SDCs, the meter size necessary for a development is broadly used as a measure of its potential water demand. In order to compare meters and calculate the total demand of the system, meters are often compared by their flow rates and measured by their meter capacity equivalents (MCEs). In this system, the smallest meter employed by the City has one MCE, and every larger meter has a larger number of MCEs based on their relative flow rates. The City uses its own schedule of flow rates to assign MCEs. •FCS GROUP City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page 4 II.A.2. Growth in Demand The current (2020) maximum daily water demand, representing demand for water facilities, is 14.67 million gallons per day (MGD). During the forecast period from 2020 to 2040, the water demand is expected to grow by 5.66 MGD. If MCEs grow proportionally, 15,872 MCEs will be added during that same period, which is the denominator of the SDC calculation. The calculations of growth are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1:Growth in MCEs Growth 20211 Growth Share Water Demand, Max Daily Demand(MGD) 14.67 20.33 5.66 27.84% MCEs 41,138 57,010 15,872 27.84% Source: 2020 Tigard Water System Master Plan Table 2-8(2040 MDD);e-mail from Brian Ginter, 07/09/2021 (2020 MDD); customer billing data(2019 MCE5). II.B. IMPROVEMENT FEE An improvement fee is the eligible cost of planned projects per unit of growth that such projects will serve. Since we have already calculated growth (denominator) above, we will focus here on the improvement fee cost basis (numerator). II.B.1 . Eligibility A project's eligible cost is the product of its total cost and its eligibility percentage. The eligibility percentage represents the portion of the project that creates capacity for future users. Where possible, specific details about a project can provide an eligibility percentage. In this case, the eligibility for each project was calculated by Murraysmith in the City's 2020 Water System Plan. 11.6.2. Improvement Fee Cost Basis Projects in the improvement fee cost basis were also taken from the City's 2020 Water System Plan. Error! Reference source not found. below shows all the projects in the improvement fee cost basis. T he eligibility for each project is shown in the Eligibility Percentage column, and the Eligible Cost column shows that full amount of the improvement fee cost basis is $69.7 million. •FCS GROUP City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page 5 Table 2:Water System Improvement Fee Cost Basis Eligibility Project Timing Cost Percentage Eligible Cost S-1 LOT Supply Expansion 2026-2030 $ 7,876,000 100% $ 7,876,000 R-1 Reservoir 18 2021-2025 33,557,000 73% 24,608,467 R-2 Reservoir 19 2031-2040 7,552,000 100% 7,552,000 PS-1 Pump Station 8 Rebuild 2021-2025 5,038,000 28% 1,402,611 D-1 SW Burgundy Court Pressure Improvement 2021-2025 243,000 0% - D-2 560E/640 Zone Consolidation 2021-2025 401,000 0% - D-3 560C/560D Zone Consolidation 2021-2025 556,000 0% - D-4 560D/560E Zone Consolidation 2026-2030 506,000 0% - D-5 560F/560G Zone Consolidation 2026-2030 476,000 0% - D-6 560F/530 Zone Consolidation 2026-2030 14,543,500 28% 4,049,002 D-7 560G/560H Zone Consolidation 2026-2030 1,098,000 0% - D-8 560H/560A Zone Consolidation 2026-2030 138,000 28% 38,420 D-9 Pipe Renewal and Replacement Program 2021-2040 84,975,000 28% 23,657,575 P-1 50-year Water Distribution Seismic CIP 2021-2025 155,000 28% 43,153 P-2 ASR Feasibility Study 2021-2025 1,151,000 28% 320,446 P-3 Reservoir 8-1 Structural Analysis/Improvement 2021-2025 1,885,000 0% - P-4 Water System Master Plan 2026-2040 600,000 28% 167,044 P-5 Water Management and Conservation Plan 2026-2040 160,000 0% - 0-2 Reservoir and Pump Station Abandonment Program 2021-2030 888,000 0% - Total $ 161,798,500 $ 69,714,717 Source: 2020 Tigard Water System Plan Table 8-1(project list);City staff(project costs,eligbility percentages);Email from Brian Ginter(eligibility for project R-1) II.C. REIMBURSEMENT FEE A reimbursement fee is the eligible cost of the water facilities available for future users per unit of growth that such facilities will serve. Since growth was calculated in Section II.A, we will focus on the eligible cost of the water facilities available for future users. That is, we will focus on the reimbursable cost of existing facilities. II.C.1 . Eligibility To calculate the eligible cost of the City's assets available for future users, four systems of the full water system were examined: supply, storage, pumping, and transmission and distribution. Details on the remaining capacity of each of these systems were sourced from the 2020 Water System Plan, and from Murraysmith where needed. II.C.2. Calculated Reimbursement Fee Cost Basis The reimbursement fee cost basis is the product of remaining capacity for each water system and the eligible original cost of those systems. The eligible cost for each system is simply the original cost, less any outside funding or outstanding principal for debt related to those systems. The eligible cost for reimbursement is shown in row 4 of Table 3 below. The eligible cost multiplied by the capacity for growth equals the reimbursable cost of the City's water system, which as shown in Table 3 totals to $36.6 million. •:4FCS GROUP City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page 6 Table 3: Reimbursement Fee Cost Basis Transmission Supply Storage Pumping &Distribution Total Original Cost $ 36,436,236 $ 33,462,056 $ 13,183,402 $ 80,942,435 $164,024,128 Outside Funding - - - 8,916,258 8,916,258 Reimbursable Outstanding Debt 33,709,921 - - - 33,709,921 Original Cost Eligible for Reimbursement $ 2,726,315 $ 33,462,056 $ 13,183,402 $ 72,026,177 $121,397,949 Cost-Weighted Capacity for Growth 13% 40% 22% 28% 30% Total Reimbursable Costs $ 344,706 $ 13,288,629 $ 2,940,702 $ 20,052,541 $ 36,626,578 Source: City staff(original cost,outside funding,and outstanding debt);2020 Tigard Water System Plan, Tables 4-5,5-4, and 5-7 (capacity for growth in the supply,storage,and pumping systems);Email from Brian Ginter(capacity in the transmission&distribution system) II.D. CALCULATED SDC This section combines the eligible costs from the improvement and reimbursement fee cost bases and applies adjustments for fund balance and compliance costs. The result is a total SDC per MCE, which can be charged to each development based on its water meter size. II.D.1 . Adjustments The City estimates that it has $16,052,039 in its improvement fee fund balance as of December 1, 2021. Unspent improvement fee revenue represents projects that remain unbuilt. Because these projects remain on the project list and are part of the improvement fee cost basis, it is reasonable to reduce this cost basis by the amount of revenue already received for those projects that remain on the list. Table 4: Adjustment to the Improvement Fee Cost Basis Unadjusted Improvement Fee Cost Basis $ 69,714,717 Improvement Fee Fund Balance (16,052,039) Improvement Fee Cost Basis $ 53,662,678 ORS 223.307(5) authorizes the expenditure of SDCs on "the costs of complying with the provisions of ORS 223.297 to 223.314, including the costs of developing system development charge methodologies and providing an annual accounting of system development charge expenditures." To avoid spending monies for compliance that might otherwise have been spent on growth-related projects, this report also includes compliance costs as a separate cost basis. The City estimates that compliance costs will equal 5.00 percent of the improvement and reimbursement fees. II.D.2. Calculated SDC Table 5 below is a complete calculation of the water SDC showing the improvement fee, reimbursement fee, and compliance fee per MCE. •FCS GROUP City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page 7 Table 5: Calculated SDC Cost Basis: Improvement Fee $ 53,662,678 Reimbursement Fee 36,626,578 Total Cost Basis $ 90,289,257 Growth in MCEs 15,872 Improvement Fee per MCE $ 3,381 Reimbursement Fee per MCE 2,308 SDC per MCE $ 5,689 Compliance Fee per MCE 284 Total SDC per MCE $ 5,973 As shown above, the maximum allowable charge is $5,973 per MCE. Below is a complete schedule for the water SDC based on meter size and the City's flow rates. Table 6:Water SDC Schedule Reimbursement Compliance Calculated Full Meter Size MCEs by Meter Improvement Fee Fee Fee SDC 5/8" 1.00 $ 3,381 $ 2,308 $ 284 $ 5,973 3/4" 1.44 4,869 3,324 410 8,603 1" 2.67 9,019 6,156 759 15,934 1 1/2" 8.00 27,042 18,457 2,275 47,774 2" 12.99 43,911 29,971 3,694 77,576 3" 22.90 77,435 52,852 6,514 136,802 4" 46.97 158,810 108,393 13,360 280,564 6" 50.00 169,053 115,384 14,222 298,659 8" A 80.00 270,484 184,614 22,755 477,853 II.D.3. Comparison This section provides comparisons for the City's current and proposed SDCs against those of comparable jurisdictions. As shown in Table 7 below, if SDCs are implemented as proposed, the City will have a lower water SDC than it currently charges, and will charge a middling water SDC relative to several comparable jurisdictions. •:4FCS GROUP City of Tigard Water System Development Charge Update August 24, 2022 page 8 Table 7: Water SDC Comparison Water SDC per SFR Hillsboro $ 13,395 Wilsonville 10,971 Tigard (Current) 10,853 Cornelius 9,449 Beaverton 9,354 Lake Oswego 9,055 Forest Grove 7,208 Newberg 6,444 Tigard (Proposed) 5,973 Tualatin 5,306 Sherwood 4,838 Portland 4,563 Milwaukie 2,041 Source: Survey by FCS GROUP, as of 7/31/2022 •FCS GROUP AIS-5021 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 10/25/2022 Length (in minutes): 60 Minutes Agenda Title: Goal 3 Climate Action Recommendations Authored By: Emily Tritsch Presented By: Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE In April 2021, City Council set an ambitious goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2035. A leading international consulting firm, SSG, set out to answer the question of what it would take to realize that goal.This briefing lays out the low carbon actions required to make progress on becoming a carbon-neutral city. ACTION REQUESTED While no formal Council action is requested, the team is hoping Council will affirm this direction in climate mitigation: making progress towards carbon neutrality. BACKGROUND INFORMATION City Council set four goals during the spring of 2021, with Goal 3 being'development and implementation of a bold community resiliency plan.' Since 2021, subject matter experts and leads among the City's professional staff have worked to identify climate mitigation and adaptation solutions, including those related to hazard mitigation and disaster planning.This briefing focuses on climate mitigation and identifies low carbon actions that set a pathway to carbon neutrality.The low carbon actions proposed are listed in the Recommended Low Carbon Actions attachment to this AIS; adaptation opportunities are identified with each action. A briefing on climate adaptation, natural hazard mitigation, and disaster preparedness will take place in 2023 following the regional Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan update. When City Council set the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2035, words like "bold" and "moonshot" spoke to the ambition to take meaningful action to address our planet's climate crisis.The pursuit of carbon neutrality is well-timed as state and federal policy and resources for climate action become increasingly available. Recent legislation and programs in support of climate mitigation at the state and national level include: • Executive Order 20-04 (signed in 2020)—directed agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while centering the needs of vulnerable communities. Goals included: 45% reduction in carbon emissions from 1990 levels by 2035, and 80% reduction by 2050. • Oregon House Bills 2165, 2475, 3141 (signed in 2021)—part of a clean energy package to reduce emissions, expand clean energy access, extend EV rebates to low income and rural community, enhance energy efficiency programs, and create clean technology jobs • Oregon House Bill 2021 (signed in 2021) set the most aggressive timeline in the country to move to 100%clean electricity sources by 2040 • Climate-Friendly and Equitable Community(CFEC) rules (adopted by DLCD in 2022)—requires City action to address climate pollution in transportation sector with consideration also for land use and housing • Climate Pact, updating the Pacific Coast Collaborative agreement between West Coast states in the US and British Columbia (signed Oct 2022) with the intention of reducing greenhouse gas emissions while growing the clean energy economy •At the Federal level, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022, committing $369B, an historic amount,to energy and climate programs. Among the goals of the IRA is to cut national greenhouse gas emissions by roughly 40%of 2003 levels by 2030 The attached Climate Policy Crosswalk notes several state measures and targets, some of which include requirements of Oregon cities like Tigard. The City has the opportunity to go beyond these targets to realize better environmental and health outcomes on a shorter time horizon. Implementing some of the low carbon actions, described below and in the attached Low Carbon Action document,would make progress on both the City's carbon neutrality goal and the state's. Climate mitigation targets and actions of neighboring jurisdictions are included in the Crosswalk as well to serve as points of reference. The City of Tigard has been working in service to environmental health and sustainability for years, with several programs specifically targeting greenhouse gas emissions and supporting carbon neutrality.These efforts include: the Tigard MADE project that increases the density and diversity of our employment lands, City vehicle electrification, development of an Electric Mobility Strategy, increasing recycling options, providing code clarity for urban agriculture, nature-friendly vegetation and greenspace management programs, LED streetlights, and creation of additional active transportation options. Several of the low carbon actions proposed (listed in the Recommended Low Carbon Action attachment to this AIS) build off of these existing efforts and advance Tigard's progress to carbon neutrality. Following this briefing,Tigard teammates will work with community stakeholders to discuss implementation of low carbon actions, some which will be led by the City while others will advance through advocacy to the state, Metro,TriMet, and others. In so doing,Tigard will deliver on Strategy 3.4,to develop regional partnerships reducing carbon throughout the region for the benefit of residents of our city, region, and state. Previous actions on this topic April 2021—City Council adopted Council Goal 3: Develop and implement a bold community resiliency plan, with the outcome of reducing the carbon footprint in the City. The internal Community Resilience Plan (CRP)team has provided quarterly updates on progress since that time. Future Council Considerations • Update on Natural Hazard Mitigation Planning—Winter 2022. o Council briefing to follow County-led plan implementation workshop in October 2022. o Briefing to include mitigation action information,to be adopted by Washington County IEM (Innovated Emergency Management) • Climate and Community Resilience Plan—to be presented for adoption by City Council in Spring 2023 Results of Community Engagement and Outreach Between interviews, advisory committees,task forces, surveys, and Council testimony,there have been more than 500 touchpoints across the community on climate action topics since January 2022.The majority of the feedback received through these channels, some of which is included in the attached Comment-Response Log and some of which is summarized below, shows a community who is ready for climate action.The Tigard community has showed up in many ways over the last year to ask City leadership to do more for the environment, and City teammates look forward to working with community to discuss implementing climate actions, from tree planting to changing habits to sharing information with neighbors. Details on specific engagement efforts and outcomes follow: Tigard teammates assembled a Technical Advisory Committee and Community Advisory Committee to brainstorm, review, and validate proposed low-carbon actions, including the specific recommendations included in this briefing.The City's consulting team, SSG, organized three BIPOC Task Force meetings so that feedback from this community could be received directly. Considerations around identification and implementation of proposed low-carbon actions were identified are reflected in the Low Carbon Action Report, attached to this AIS. In Spring 2022,Tigard teammates worked with SSG to produce and publish a community survey soliciting feedback on low carbon solutions considered both for City policy and community action. The survey, which was open for one month, received more than 200 responses from Tigard residents, including property owners and renters, business owners, residents of neighborhoods across the City, at different ages, and at various income levels.The demographic breakdown of respondents is similar to the City's overall breakdown in terms of race.The following is a summary of identifying information of respondents: • 85% are homeowners •A small majority of respondents live in Southview neighborhood (14%) or North Tigard/ Metzger (13%) • One-quarter of respondents were age 60-69; one-quarter were age 40-49; 16%were aged 30-39. Other age categories were less frequently represented • 27% of respondents had an annual household income of$100,000-$149,999 • 84% of respondents identified as White A summary of feedback received through this survey is below: Energy efficiency improvements 68%expressed interest in making energy efficiency improvements, including improving insulation, installing more efficient windows and/or doors, and replacing older appliances. A majority indicated that, to make these changes, they would need partial financial support, a list of recommended professionals and contractors, and further education about the system and its benefits Renewable Energy 58%supported increasing renewable energy in general, and 66%would be interested in installing rooftop solar in the next 5 years. A further 30%would be supportive with additional information related to financial impacts, technology, and benefits of these installations. Financial support (covering some or all costs of installation)was the most identified need to respondents to implement this action.Those who were not supportive or interested in renewable energy expressed concern about the investment cost, return-on-investment, and performance of solar in this area; several indicated a preference to exploring other energy options Active and Shared Transportation 90% use personal vehicles as primary transportation; 77%do not take public transportation and 73% do not use cycling for commuting.To increase regular use of public transportation, respondents primarily indicated a need for lower costs, direct routes, and transit stops closer to origin/destinations. To increase cycling for commuting, respondents primarily reported wanted increased separated and protected bike lanes, safe cycling courses, and an electric bicycle incentive program Related to centering equity in low-carbon investments,the majority of respondents expressed support.Those not supportive of centering equity and environmental justice expressed concern about the impact to taxpayers, and a belief that climate action is out of scope of municipal government. Themes from those supportive of equity—BIPOC and low-income support for climate action—include the following; quotations are participant responses to the associated open-ended questions: •Financial: "Support for low-income residents and renters to participate in energy efficiency programs. Most programs are geared toward homeowners or people with enough disposable income or savings to pay for upgrades. Even with current incentives it can be cost prohibitive." •Education and collaboration: "Ongoing outreach to county partners for ideas, networking, Collaboration to bring others together to bring forth solutions also. Like a Tuesday roundtable. Heck I'd chair it!" •Policies for specific climate action, as through a climate lens •Engagement with vulnerable community members,through frequent, meaningful, and reflective engagement. Impacts to Community,Budget,Policies and Plans Connection to Strategic Goals: The low carbon actions proposed as part of this briefing are connected to Council Goal 3:Develop and implement a bold community resiliency plan. There are also direct benefits to public service and customer excellence, an accessible pedestrian network, and development planning, as set out in Tigard's strategic priorities. Community Impacts, including equity investments and benefits: The impacts to the community as a result of the low carbon actions proposed, include the following.The Recommended Low Carbon Actions list (attached to this AIS) includes implications specific to low-income and BIPOC communities. • By advocating to the state for increased energy efficiency requirements of new buildings, incoming residents could enjoy lower energy bills • Low energy development, renewable installations, and other new building enhancements or retrofits can create well-paying jobs in the construction field. • Enhancing safe and accessible active transportation options provide increased choice for the traveling public through Tigard. Filling gaps in the sidewalk,trail, and bicycle networks can encourage active mobility and have the result of increasing public health. • Movement away from gas-powered vehicles, as is proposed in the low-carbon actions list, would have the benefit of saving drivers gas money • Investments in job training associated with material reuse and retrofit, including converting gas-powered vehicles to electric or alternative fuels, can create new well-paying jobs for people working in the trades •As part of implementing the low-carbon actions proposed here, the City could consider a Pathway to Construction Careers model, similar to what the federal government offers, setting targets for employment and career growth for BIPOC workers. Centering benefits on these groups supports investment in and economic growth of the BIPOC community. Budget Considerations City Council approved spending up to$875,000 of ARPA funds on implementation of climate and community resiliency activities during the August 10, 2021 Council session. Cost estimates associated with specific climate and community resilience investments will be identified as part of implementation planning over the next several months.These will be presented as part of a future Council Action (expected to be associated with Council's adoption of the Climate and Community Resilience Plan estimated to be in spring 2023) ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION City Council is asked to receive the Recommended Low Carbon Actions briefing. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES o Community Resiliency Plan website: https://www.tigard-or.gov/community-support/community-resiliency-plan o Climate Hub- For information on rebates and ways for community members to save through energy efficiency: https://www.tigard-or.gov/community-support/community-resiliency-plan/climate-hub o Climate Action Plan Engage Tigard page: https://www.engage.tigard-or.gov/cap o Late Night in Tigard: Mayor Snider talks to Tigard's Climate Champions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goJ41fZIQpo o Climate Action Speaker Series presentations o The Coming Climate:Advancing regional plans for municipal adaptations to a warming planet, with scholar and PSU professor Dr. Vivek Shandas:Tigard Speaker Series: Community Resiliency Plan with Dr. Vivek Shandas-YouTube o PGE:Climate Action and Green Partner Programs, renewable energy and vehicle electrification programs with PGE's Local Government Affairs Manager,Troy Gagliano: Climate Action Speaker Series with Speaker:Troy Gagliano-YouTube o Building Livable and Sustainable Communities through Transit, climate actions, service expansion, and transit solutions from TriMet, with Fiona Lyon and Alan Lehto: https://youtu.be/nGvgAPnU4G Attachments Community Survey Results Climate Mitigation Briefing Climate Policy Crosswalk Recommended Low Carbon Actions Community Survey Supports the fourth engagement objective to involve diverse community members in documenting their lived-experiences with climate change, the Plan's vision and objectives, and their preferred approach to climate action in Tigard. Multiple choice, rating, ranking, and open response questions of proposed Climate Action "Big Moves" Who Participated 203 community members • Individuals who live, work, or work and live in Tigard • Excluded participants who don't live or work in Tigard Identifiers • 86% are homeowners • 14% live in Southview & 13% live in North Tigard/Metzger • 25% were 60-69, 25% were 40-49, and 16% were 30-39 • 27% annual household income $100,000-149,999 • 84% white Homes and Buildings 68% expressed interest in making energy efficiency improvements. nn I I mai o o op • Improve insulation O 0 00 mm • Install more efficient windows and/or doors Retrofit existing buildings • Replacing older appliances Homes and Buildings Supports needed ^nn •• mp] Partial financial support, as oa as 00 • A list of recommended professionals 00 m m and contractors, • Education about the system and how Retrofit existing buildings well it works in Tigard Energy 58% supported increasing renewable energy in general in 66% would be interested in installing ‘!�� :: rooftop solar in the next 5 years i i --- 30% may support with additional 04 `J info: Increase renewable energy • Financia I impacts • Technology • Benefits Energy �, Supports needed 11\ \ Ifs an I — pp• Partial financial su ort_ • A list of recommended professionals 04-0 and contractors, • Full financial support Increase renewable energy Energy ___ Concerns among those who didn't --- /1"-- _:___ support or want to install renewable ii \ sis /� - energy: 0-1-3 • Investment cost and long ROI • Explore other energy options Increase renewable energy • Performance of solar in low sunshine areas Active and Shared Transportation 90% use personal vehicles as primary transportation • 77% do not take public transportation 11 73% do not use cycling for commute Increase active transportation and transit use Active and Shared Transportation Increase cycling: 411 • Increased separated and protected bike lanes %..410)\. • Offering safe cycling courses o 0 • An electric bike incentive program 14 • A Increaseublic transportation: p p Increase active transportation • Lower costs and transit use • Direct routes • Transit stops closer to origin/destination Equity and Environmental Justice • 76 respondents for the open response question o 62 were neutral/supportive responses o 14 were non-supportive • 64% were above 50 years of age • Income greater than $100,000 Themes for non-supportive comments, include: • Not supportive of centering equity and environmental justice, • Concern over the impact on taxpayers, and • Belief that climate action is out of scope of municipal government jurisdiction. Supportive themes • Financial o "Support for low income residents and renters to participate in energy efficiency programs. Most programs are geared toward homeowners or people with enough disposable income or savings to pay for upgrades. Even with current incentives it can be cost prohibitive." • Education and collaboration o "Ongoing outreach to county partners for ideas, networking, Collaboration to bring others together to bring forth solutions also. Like a Tuesday round table. Heck I'd chair it!" • Policies for specific climate action (e.g. climate lens) • Engagement w vulnerable community members Key Findings/Recommendations Financial support is ranked high (either partial or full) Increase education e.g. opportunities, technology, contractors Increased awareness of why we need to respond climate change Increased engagement with vulnerable community members Project Report 02 August 2018-31 May 2022 CityTigardof Climate Action Plan . 1.• BANG THE TABLE .- engagementHQ Visitors Summary Highlights TOTAL MAX VISITORS PER VISITS DAY 300 2 k 168 NEW 200 REGISTRATI ONS 1 100 ENGAGED INFORMED AWARE iki VISITORS VISITORS VISITORS • AN 1 Apr'22 1 May'22 221 327 1 .6 k _ Pageviews Visitors Aware Participants 1,555 Engaged Participants 221 Aware Actions Performed Participants Engaged Actions Performed Registered Unverified Anonymous Visited a Project or Tool Page 1,555 Informed Participants 327 Contributed on Forums 0 0 0 Participated in Surveys 3 1 214 Informed Actions Performed Participants Contributed to Newsfeeds 0 0 0 Viewed a video 0 Participated in Quick Polls 0 0 0 Viewed a photo 0 Posted on Guestbooks 0 0 0 Downloaded a document 0 Contributed to Stories 0 0 0 Visited the Key Dates page 0 Visited an FAQ list Page 0 Asked Questions 0 0 0 Visited Instagram Page 0 Placed Pins on Places 0 1 0 Visited Multiple Project Pages 105 Contributed to Ideas 0 2 1 Contributed to a tool(engaged) 221 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 ENGAGEMENT TOOLS SUMMARY 0 1 1 0 0 FORUM TOPICS SURVEYS NEWS FEEDS QUICK POLLS GUEST BOOKS 0 0 1 STORIES Q&A S PLACES i Tool Type Contributors Engagement Tool Name Tool Status Visitors Registered Unverified Anonymous Newsfeed About Published 1 0 0 0 Place Map Your Neighborhood! Published 15 0 1 0 Survey Tool Climate Action Plan Survey Archived 366 3 1 214 Ideas Share Your Ideas on How Tigard Can Published 11 0 2 1 Become Climate Ready! Page 2 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 ENGAGEMENT TOOL: PLACE Map Your Neighborhood! Visitors ® Contributors 0 CONTRIBUTIONS EI LULL-U5-1.15 U25:00:40-U/UU Survey test survey test Address: 12206 Southwest 131st Avenue,Tigard,Oregon 97223, United States http://www.engage.tigard-or.gov/cap/maps/map-your-neighborhood?reporting=true#m CATEGORY arker-63750 Safer Biking and Walking Priority 2022-05-05 08:56:19-0700 Survey test survey test Address: 12250 Southwest 128th Avenue,Tigard,Oregon 97223, United States http://www.engage.tigard-or.gov/cap/maps/map-your-neighborhood?reporting=true#m CATEGORY arker-63751 Energy Equity Need Page 3 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 ENGAGEMENT TOOL: SURVEY TOOL Climate Action Plan Survey Visitors 366 Contributors 218 CONTRIBUTIONS im Which of the following energy efficiency improvements are you interested in making to your property? Please select all that... 100 87 80 71 63 57 60 I 49 41 40 33 25 20 13 Question options • Improving the insulation to prevent the loss of heated or cooled air. • Converting to a heat pump or heat exchange system(supplemented by electricity)that provides both heating and cooling by transferring heat back and forth between a building and an external source. • Installing more efficient windows and/or doors to prevent the loss of heated or cooled air. • Installing low-flow showers,faucets,and toilets to reduce the amount of water that requires treatment;energy used to treat the water; and wastewater that emits methane,a greenhouse gas. • Replacing older appliances with more efficient options. • I have already completed all of these improvements. • I am not interested in making any of these improvements. • I am a renter and would require the sign off of my landlord/building owner to make these improvements. • Other(please specify) Optional question(216 response(s),6 skipped) Question type:Checkbox Question Page 4 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What support would you need to make the above changes? Please rank in order of importance with 1 being the most important a... OPTIONS AVG. RANK Partial financial support(e.g. proportion of the cost of the upgrades is covered by 3.00 another party). A list of recommended professionals and contractors. 3.34 Education about the system and how well it works in Tigard. 3.54 Information on how to make these changes myself. 3.71 Full financial support(e.g.the total cost of upgrades is covered by another party). 3.83 Financing support(e.g. support to finance the upfront cost,to be paid off over 3.95 time by beneficiary). The agreement from my landlord or building owner. 5.71 Other 6.32 Optional question(180 response(s),42 skipped) Question type:Ranking Question Page 5 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 How supportive are you of increasing the renewable energy supply, through either rooftop solar systems or community-scale wind and solar power, in Tigard? Please select all that apply. 160 140 140 120 100 80 60 50 40 26 18 17 20 8 Question options • I am in full support. I may support an increase if I had more information about the technology. • I may support an increase if I had more information about the benefits. • I may support an increase if I had more information about the financial impacts on me and my household. • I do not support an increase in renewable energy generation. Other(please specify) Optional question(213 response(s),9 skipped) Question type:Checkbox Question Page 6 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Would you consider installing rooftop solar or another renewable energy source to your property in the next five years? 36(16.5%) 38(17.4%) 111 144(66.1%) Question options W. Yes No Unsure/I would need additional information to decide. Optional question(217 response(s),5 skipped) Question type:Radio Button Question Page 7 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What support would you need to add rooftop solar or other renewable energy to your property? Please select all that apply. 140 117 120 100 84 78 80 I 111 I 60 50 48 46 40 30 30 22 20 11 Question options • Education about the changes and how well they may work in Tigard Education about the benefits to my household • Partial financial support(a proportion of the cost of the new system is covered by another party such as a utility,government,or non- profit) • Full financial support(the total cost of the new system is covered by another party such as a utility,government,or non-profit) • Financing support(support to finance the upfront cost,to be paid off over time by the beneficiary) • Information on how to make these changes myself 0 A list of recommended professionals and contractors • The agreement of my landlord or building owner • No additional support is required • I am not interested in making any of these improvements Optional question(211 response(s), 11 skipped) Question type:Checkbox Question Page 8 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Do you support an increase in community-scale wind and solar projects? 171.9%)(7.9%) 37(17.1%) 26(12.0%) I- 31 (14.4%) 105(48.6%) Question options • Yes,but I am not prepared to pay more for electricity to support it. • Yes,but I am not able to pay more for electricity to support it Yes,and I am willing to pay more for electricity to support it • No • Unsure Optional question(215 response(s), 7 skipped) Question type:Radio Button Question Page 9 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What is your main mode of transportation to get around Tigard? 3(1.4%) , 7(3.3%) 7(3.3%) 8(3.8%) 188(88.3%) Question options My own vehicle In a vehicle as a passenger Public transit Biking Walking Optional question(212 response(s), 10 skipped) Question type:Dropdown Question Page 10 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Are you interested in purchasing or leasing an electric vehicle (EV) in the next 5 years? 20(9.2%) 6(2.8%) 70(32.3%) — 121 (55.8%) Question options • Yes a No I would prefer a carsharing*program to owning an EV I already own an EV Optional question(216 response(s),6 skipped) Question type:Dropdown Question Page 11 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Are there any barriers to you purchasing an electric vehicle (EV)? Please select all that apply. 140 130 120 102 100 80 60 35 34 40 31 26 15 17 20 Question options • Cost Availability-It's hard to purchase an EV in Tigard • Charging stations-I'm unsure if there are enough charging stations for me to drive an EV comfortably without risking running out of power • Maintenance-There is a lack of mechanics to service and maintain EVs locally There are no barriers O I'm not interested in purchasing an EV • I already own an EV Other(please specify) Optional question(214 response(s),8 skipped) Question type:Checkbox Question Page 12 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Do you take public transportation in Tigard? r 7(3.3%) 8(3.8%) 24(11.5%) !, 10(4.8%) 160(76.6%) Question options • Yes, regularly(multiple times per week) 0 Yes,sometimes(1-2 times per week) Yes,occasionally(1-2 times per month or less) • Yes,seasonally(e.g.in the warmer months of the year only) 0 No Optional question(208 response(s), 14 skipped) Question type:Dropdown Question Page 13 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 If you do not take public transportation on a regular basis, what would encourage you to take it? Please check all that apply. 90 80 80 74 67 70 60 60 50 40 35 30 20 11 10 Question options • More frequent service • More direct routes • Transit stops closer to your origin or destination • Lower cost • Nothing will incentivize me to use public transit • Other(please specify) Optional question(195 response(s),27 skipped) Question type:Checkbox Question Page 14 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Do you ride your bike to commute (e.g. to reach a destination such as work, school, errands) in Tigard? r 9(4.3%) MP 13(6.2%) lor 13(6.2%) 62(29.7%) -N 21 (10.0%) 91 (43.5%) Question options • Yes,regularly(multiple times per week) Yes,sometimes(1-2 times per week) • Yes,occasionally(1-2 times per month or less) Yes,seasonally(e.g.during the warmer months of the year only) • No, I don't ride a bike • No,but I ride my bike for recreation or leisure Optional question(208 response(s), 14 skipped) Question type:Dropdown Question Page 15 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 If you do not ride your bike on a regular basis to commute in Tigard, what would encourage you to? Please check all that apply. 90 85 80 70 61 60 47 50 41 40 30 25 20 13 10 10 Question options • Separated and protected bike lanes • An electric bike incentive program • Offering safe cycling courses • Better protection against bike theft(e.g.more secure parking facilities,police-supported bike identification and return services,etc.) • A bike-share program • Nothing will incentivize me to ride a bike • I am unable to ride a bike Optional question(184 response(s),38 skipped) Question type:Checkbox Question Page 16 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What do you think the City should focus on in terms of improving transportation? Please rank in order of importance with 1 being the most important and 4 being the least important. OPTIONS AVG. RANK The City should focus equally on increasing EV use, active transportation, and 2.21 public transportation Increase active transportation (e.g. by installing and maintaining more walking, 2.28 cycling, in-line skating, and skateboard) Increase public transportation (e.g. by increasing direct route options,frequency, 2.41 and lowering cost) Increase the use of EVs(e.g. by installing public charging stations) 2.65 Optional question(194 response(s),28 skipped) Question type:Ranking Question Page 17 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What support would you need from the City to reduce your household waste? 160 136 140 120 108 109 100 86 75 80 60 60 50 48 40 20 Question options ` Increase waste sorting education • Increase support for reuse programs • Provide community reuse centers II Provide a green procurement strategy • Increase residential waste infrastructure(e.g.more recycling and composting bins) • Increase financial incentives for recycling and composting • Institute a"pay as they go"program for residential garbage(for example,if a home exceeds more than one bag per household per week they would be required to pay a fee per bag) • Other(please specify) Optional question(209 response(s), 13 skipped) Question type:Checkbox Question Page 18 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Should the City support programs that train people to have these and other skills that will be required to help Tigard transition to a low emissions future? 40(18.9%) 172(81.1%) Question options Yes No Optional question(211 response(s), 11 skipped) Question type:Radio Button Question Page 19 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Do you live or work in Tigard? 16(7.5%) 71 (33.2%) 108(50.5%) 19(8.9%) Question options Is I live in Tigard but work elsewhere • I work in Tigard but live elsewhere • I both live and work in Tigard I don't live or work in Tigard Optional question(213 response(s),9 skipped) Question type:Radio Button Question Page 20 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What neighborhood do you live in? 2(2.9%) l 1 2(2.9%) 11 6(8.7%) 9(13.0%) -N 2(2.9%) 6(8.7%) W • • 9(13.0%) 111 2(2.9%) 10(14.5%) 13(18.8%) J - 8(11.6%) Question options Downtown Cook Park Derry Dell • Greenburg Road Durham Road Summerlake/Scholls • North Tigard/Metzger ` Jack park • Bull Mountain • Southview • West Tigard Optional question(69 response(s), 153 skipped) Question type:Dropdown Question Page 21 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What neighborhood do you live in? 4(3.8%) r 8(7.5%) 4(3.8%) 7(6.6%) 18(17.0%) I.I11111111°A 17(16.0%) 1111, 6(5.7%) — 3(2.8%) �_ 3(2.8%) 9(8.5%) 11 (10.4%) J 7(6.6%) J \_ 9(8.5%) Question options _ Downtown • Cook Park • Derry Dell • Tigard Triangle • Greenburg Road • Durham Road • Summerlake/Scholls • North Tigard/Metzger • Jack Park • Bull Mountain • Southview • West Tigard • Englewood Park Optional question(105 response(s), 117 skipped) Question type:Dropdown Question Page 22 of 28 City of Tigard :Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Which best describes your living situation? 2(0.9% , 1 (0.5%) 4(1.9%) 26(12.0%) 183(84.7%) Question options • I own the place where I live • I rent the place where I live • I live with friends or relatives • I do not have a place to live • Other(please specify) Optional question(215 response(s), 7 skipped) Question type:Radio Button Question Page 23 of 28 City of Tigard :Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What's your age group? 11 (5.2%) 27(12.7%) 36(16.9%) 55(25.8%) 52(24.4%) 32(15.0%) Question options _ 18-29 30-39 • 40-49 • 50-59 • 60-69 • 70 and better Optional question(212 response(s), 10 skipped) Question type:Radio Button Question Page 24 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Which of the below best describes your race/ethnicity? Check all that apply. 200 182 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 3 40 14 14 20 5 6 6 Question options • Asian • Black or African American White • Hispanic or Latino • Native American • Hawaiian or Pacific Islander • Other(please specify) Optional question(209 response(s), 13 skipped) Question type:Checkbox Question Page 25 of 28 City of Tigard : Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 What is your total household income? r 9(4.5%) 32(16.1%) 7- 16(8.0%) 22(11.1%) 27(13.6%) 37(18.6%) 56(28.1%) Question options • Less than$25,000 • $25,000-$49,999 • $50,000-$74,999 • $75,000-$99,999 • $100,000-$149,999 • $150,000-$199,999 • $200,000 or more Optional question(198 response(s),24 skipped) Question type:Radio Button Question Page 26 of 28 City of Tigard :Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 Are you interested in being added to our interested parties list? 75(35.2%) 138(64.8%) Question options _ Yes 1 No Optional question(212 response(s), 10 skipped) Question type:Radio Button Question Page 27 of 28 City of Tigard :Summary Report for 02 August 2018 to 31 May 2022 IDEAS Share Your Ideas on How Tigard Can Become Climate Ready! Visitors NM Contributors © CONTRIBUTIONS 4 09 April 22 Elizabeth Sprague Community classes on sustainability through growin VOTES g food, preserving food, seed saving and keeping po ultry/livestock responsibly. Education 29 April 22 Jenny Urbina Composting programs ,r1TG- Food waste is one of the major contributors to the release of green house gasses in ou r world. I think an amazing thing to implement would be composting programs for both r esidential and businesses.This compost can be used to fertilize local parks, residents gardens,and even sold for a fundraiser and we can help divert food waste that is curre ntly going into landfills to be more sustainably disposed of. 29 April 22 Jenny Urbina Sustainable landscapes VOTES Work with residents to provide an educational program on sustainable landscape alter natives for their homes. Encourage using native plants or solutions for common resour ce wasters. For example, instead of grass lawns,switch to clover.Or teaching about ra in barrel water collection as opposed to running the sprinklers. Page 28 of 28 • • •t, 0 • 1k--.. • • :,,• . Briefing 1 : Path to • Carbon Neutrality ilk 1110 11111 4111116 ,„• . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ ■ . . II II ■ ■ . . ii ii ■ . • • • • • Image source: Policy Options Politiqu- 1 Goal 3 : Climate and Community Resilience 1 Oct 25, 2022 CITY OF Tigard CommunityResiliencyPlan \ia— . PleM T A- Outcome: Reduced carbon footprint in the City COMMIVIW Strategies Fila•QH Wel 3.1 Develop and implement a community resiliency plan that is specific to the rbpANN needs of the Tigard community and organization. 3.2 Implement resiliency practices that help us achieve carbon neutrality by the year 2035. 3.3 Communicate our resiliency efforts to the community to encourage individuals and business to adopt new practices that support climate goals. 3.4 Develop regional partnerships to help reduce carbon throughout the Portland metro. pp! Tigard:An equitable community that is walkable, healthy, and accessible for everyone. Mitigation Adaptation Action to reduce Action to manage emissions that causethe risks of climate climate change1! Ili change impacts mom — J , JAH 11 F i, i' ,) OCU 20 Energy illolio New Sustainable Systems 21323 Transportation Disaster Management & Business Continuity .. VII = = = Hi Energy Efficiency gt N - Water Education infrastructure Conservation Upgrades i i i lh,' . „am ficalfr ME 1;4, Natural ME j • Environment ,Clean Energy Flood Protection Image source: Huron County Climate Mitigation Climate Adaptation Spring 2021 : Council Goal 1110114. Fall 2022: Climate Mitigation Briefing Resilience Winter 2023: Climate Adaptation / Natural Hazard Update Spring 2023: Community Resilience Implementation Planning Fall 2023: Policy, Advocacy, Investment Across the US and Oregon ,. r ,... _ � ...„ , . . .- , ,. , . , _.......,,,, F„.._ , ,.,\ . _ _ _ _ ozg wrokE ,, _ , , 4 I \ ."-71_31111 Wilf. . T- ,:"'.gym .- � �� f Yall- -r- n r• 0. .. ..'4:- , itsIll if FRSTE - :* Afi ` im. ..-7, .& , _ .4 -... J.::1,4 / SEALED qp �Y N THE I 0.0.1.-DEilli 11111 OVEKNMEI1T WSW, - �. 1 THE CLIMATE :.� il TAKEmi, CRISIS si + 1 _ ri . y Oregon Gov. Kate Brown signs UNIT'' climate pact with West Coast ' . p., _ UN report calls for urgent climate action as leaders 0,,,44. sit, fri , 40r..,– Oregon advocates push for state to do more r — * �+ 7"r' � o �� MSE `' 4414*, ! '- 'y -OK ilt # * # S ICES , if��' ,1U California to Ban the Sale of New *; ** ,, Gasoline Cars ;, . �._ ` t - i , rl° ' ' The decision,to take effect by 2035,will very likely speed a wider %, ' .transition to electric vehicles because many other states follow r4 , L q Californias standards. F � ` 4 Oregon to cover health-related climate expensesVA S 1 i Oregon is set to become the first state in the nation to cover certain climate change expenses under its i... s ,, --Medicaid program _ Ti ar continues ro ress on car on neutralityg p J . . _ .. .„.... ., _ , . .t. ..,...5., . . . ....,,: . .4.,• ...:._.- ....,..,;„..i.v.)„,. ..,..AL::. ...-.., ,4.1. '...._, L' „....-, -, _.1.elk • 'p,,,i...*:,1_,Lifik'-',i:-..:t.„.-..; .4.t.: •., -1 -.. -1:•1731:-.. .. ... 1 tfi,. 1 ' ISG • � r - _ _ - _ , e , s .- _ .5 I. . --,. - - , . - : ...!,.: .t.. . .. .':.. ..• _..,.,..,...-;.i.:,7.,............_.. . -.,...17: A %• ;�, ems: lac .. • ...,•,„ , . .. ,,,,, �i ...,::.:;,..,44;,...-.,..„,:,,, .: ... r .�4 • rb . s .., : : ,,, ti --.. , klik'S 11 3F2ts5�,h ,� 47 • . -: • t t • .mr�rr..m.�r,„oN \ j2I/ ACRESOFUS � - ll •F 5138, ' - �� :" '= _ . •••-• ""-idur... • • 14.• ,- • ti --7 i • • ,.:. .. ' API ia n ;; :. SCNO6L BUS P ',IE C I h _ �� F Z bi • v�-' P': "�"' s�t 9D00 _ °r��° , � � NO IDLING ' - S } �. - TURN fat I i,. #_--- • �-- t � . 4t, P ,, k6•: ENGINE OFF Community Engaqemi • Technical Advisory Committee, Community Advisory Committee, Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) Task Force • Community Survey with > 200 respondents • Numerous messages requesting climate action Key Recommendations • Education, information, and partnership for climate action • Financial support for carbon reducing investments, like building retrofits • Policies to encourage sustainability and discourage business as usual • Lead with equity. Center historically under- represented groups. Elevate community and youth leaders Total Emissions 700 655.7 • 571.2 600 • Business as usual ' +15% c 500 0 State regulations and 4 400 partner activities get usBusiness as planned to Business as Planned -75% (13 o 300 U Low carbon actions c 200 14(16 -99% 0 • 100 4.4 0 Land Use tçt., Mobility and Buildings `� CISMATE Solid Waste, • ACTION Recycling, Reuse Trees Op - - -. REPORT QEnergy i tok i—4•i 0 Land Use and Buildings Mobility o 4'4C. - . ' , 4114. CLINtP:CE 4P IIII � ACTION - Solid waste, Recycling, Reuse Trees _ .��REPORT . ..d. 0 Energy National League of Cities Identified TopThemes for US CityClimate Action Plans Energy Efficient Buildings la 83% Electric Vehicles 81% Waste Management 81% Public Transport 79% Renewable Energy 79% Land Use Al 43% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Emissions Reductions byCategory over Time 600 Trees — 1 .6% Solid Waste, Recycling, and Reuse — 5. 1 % TaT Mobility — 21 .7% a 400 x • Energy — 50.6% Land Use and Buildings — 21 % Net Zero by 2035 Target , 200 Gap to 2035 Target LI] 1111 0 GLYMASE 2020 2030 204 C. 2 050ACTION • PLAN Carbon Sequestration through Tree Planting Trees — 1 .6% Solid Waste, Recycling, Plant 7,000 trees per and Reuse — 5. 1 % year through 2035 Mobility — 21 .7% o Energy — 50.6% 0 Land Use and o Buildings — 21 % 0Net Zero by 2035 Target .7 200 Gap to 2035 Target w 0 GLYMASE 2020 2030 2040 " i ACTION • PLAN Emissions Reductions - Solid Waste, Recycling, and Reuse Trees — 1 .6% Includes waste Solid Waste, Recycling, reduction and and Reuse — 5. 1 % material reuse Mobility — 21 .7% o 400 Energy — 50.6% o Land Use and a Buildings — 21 % Net Zero by 2035 Target 200 Gap to 2035 Target 0 GLIMPSE 2020 2030 2040 2050 ACTION • PLAN Emissions Reductions - Mobility 600 Trees — 1 .6% Includes expanding Solid Waste, Recycling,o active transportation and Reuse — 5. 1 /o network Mobility — 21 .7% o 400 Energy — 50.6% 0 Land Use and a Buildings — 21 % Net Zero by 2035 Target ,? 200 Gap to 2035 Target 0 " GLIMPSE 2020 2030 2040 2050 ACTION PLAN Emissions Reductions - Energy Trees — 1 .6% Includes replacing water Solid Waste, Recycling, heating and cooling and Reuse — 5. 1 % systems with zero emission systems Mobility — 21 .7% 400 • Energy — 50.6% Land Use and 0 Buildings — 21 % e Net Zero by 2035 Target F, • 200 Gap to 2035 Target Ui • GLIMPSE 2020 2030 2040 2050 ACTION PSN Emissions Reductions - Land Use and Buildings Trees — 1 .6% Solid Waste, Recycling, Includes increasing and Reuse — 5. 1 % residential density Mobility — 21 .7% 0 400 Energy — 50.6% Land Use and 0 Buildings - 21 % cn Net Zero by 2035 Target 200 Gap to 2035 Target Lil0 2020 2030 2040 2050 ACTION • PLAN Community Climate City Resilience Business, Industry it, rt. 4 CUM ACTION p44N Opportunities for the City of Tigard - Council • Support greening of City operations • Update City Charter to reflect transit-friendliness • Adopt climate-friendly policy and code updates • Commit to a net zero City Hall and Public Works facility • Advocate for climate-friendly policies at regional and state level • Support staffing to sustain these initiatives and track progress • Support our partners in their efforts 'ACTION a PSN Opportunities for the City of Tigard - Teammates • Go paperless • Environmentally- responsible procurement • Transition to electric vehicles • Net zero City Hall and Public Works facilities • Natural space management • PGE partner programs: Green Future Enterprise, Drive Change, selling unused energy back to PGE Lv,Ap,„ ' 4c'ACTION PSN Opportunities for CommunityMembers Owners and Renters Speak with your property owner or consider larger upgrades for yourself: • Regularly replace air filters • Improve insulation • Utilize energy-efficient light bulbs • Energy-efficient windows • Use thermal curtains to retain heat • Invest in solar Visit Energy Trust of Oregon to get additional information and resources for free and low cost energy upgrades Visitors • Explore electric vehicles: cars, bikes • Utilize transit where possible • Regularly maintain your vehicle • Travel Safely. Watch for people • Identify opportunities to carpool traveling by foot and by bike pp p Opportunities for Business Owners • Adopt green practices: • Local sourcing • Recycle and reuse wherever possible • Compost organic products • Green transportation • Share ideas and resources • Develop plan for becoming carbon neutral rycurnuce ACTION PIAN Climate Mitigation Climate Adaptation Spring 2021 : Council Goal 11101141 Fall 2022: Climate Mitigation Briefing Resilience Winter 2022: Climate Adaptation / Natural Hazard Update Spring 2023: Community Resilience Implementation Planning Fall 2023: Policy, Advocacy, Investment Summary 1 . Continue to be bold 2 . Support partners 3 . Demonstrate resilience Questions? r . o. ms's •. 1. r= YF Ili IIPMr— �� / i kt ti k - R4 ts � F It �: XII �a^f; P, . 1 _ Il'-g.':,,.;, :.i.v.: _-: , 1. �. Y S 2 ti's I j • r x'11 '') '-!. I f-,,1-77^,',1 -,' I - . ot: 1..--_...;'• ► lil,+ U-. Y m ,;A F - r7 — l pN.wei rata,. z � i 'Tyr' A lia :14,477:' .- --• tc tttR yr v �B�n : w .' plant based die ©aware animals 100% soon ianels + zero waste 1114 too 3 1 ri . .7 ' I M- I MilliS II de + zero te skipping __-J less .ackased food reusable utensils fruit and ve4+ie bans tote ba s refs bi coffee mu' • retJsabre water bottle ometimes smaller steps get us further along. Tigard Declared Community Goal: 2020 Per Capita Fair Share GDP 2019 Total Per Capita Fair Share Fair Calculated Fair Share Carbon Neutrality by 2035 Population: GDP* Rating(>or< Emissions: Emissions GHG Rating(> Share Fair Share 2050 Target -Includes scopes 1,2 and 3(partial)for $15,000/person) (tonnes) or<5.1 tonnes 2030 2030 Target community-wide emissions /person) Reduction Target 54,149 $45,049 High 571,164 10.55 High -70%to- 171,349 Zero 75% Emissions Beaverton miMiimi 111=111 Declared Community Goal: 2016 Per Capita Fair Share GDP Total Per Capita Fair Share Fair Calculated Fair Share Carbon Neutrality by 2050 Population: GDP Rating(>or< Emissions Emissions GHG Rating(> Share Fair Share 2050 Target -3%reduction annually $15,000/person) (tonnes) or<5.1 tonnes 2030 2030 Target -Incl.scopes 1-3 and consumption, /person) Reduction community-wide emissions Taraet 94,865 $45,049 High 792,331 8.35 High -70%to- 237,699 Zero 75% Emissions Energy Efficiency in Buildings:25%reduction in energy use in buildings community-wide by 2030. Key Implementation Tool:Energy Efficiency/Weatherization Overall Impact: In the first year,they provided$13,000 in rebates to increase water conservation,and Program Positive they achieved weatherization repairs in 29 low income owner-occupied dwellings. In 2019,the City partnered with Community Action's Energy Conservation Program to improve the energy usage of income- Goals should be established,and energy use should have been documented and qualified residents'homes making them more durable,healthier measured in these dwellings before and after the rebates.Water consumption and and safer. energy use should be monitored on an ongoing basis to ensure the effectiveness of the changes,and to document a cost of the program per GJ of energy reduced and per tonne of emissions reduced.The program should be adjusted as necessary to ensure it meets the goals over time. Key Implementation Tool:Energy Efficiency Upgrades Overall Impact: This is a brilliant idea.Upgrades are difficult to get people to do because they can during Seismic Upgrading Positive require dismantling parts of the building,and disrupt a home or building's operations. The City of Beaverton identifies all applications for permits to Making upgrades mandatory(preferably,or at least incentivized)whenever permit make buildings more resilient to seismic activity and them to applications are submitted to the city for other significant alterations is a fantastic way to encourage them to also make energy efficiency retrofits at the make it happen. same time. Key Implementation Tool:Advocate for Smaller Homes Overall Impact: Advocating for smaller homes is an effective way to address housing shortages and Positive reach the city's goal of reducing energy use in buildings.Although no specific details on programming were found,the concept is important and could be used to demonstrate and gain acceptance of new zero carbon technologies in homes. Key Implementation Tool:Code for Passive House Design Overall Impact: Passiv House design is in some ways easier to promote with developers because it is Positive generally less prescriptive and more technology-agnostic than'net zero'homes. Incorporating encouragement for'passiv house'standards into building code would encourage the development of many approaches to reducing energy use in residential buildings. Decarbonizing Natural Gas in Buildings:Net Zero Emissions for all community natural gas by 2040. Not applicable. Overall Impact: This goal is highly questionable,as ultimately both fossil fuel-based natural gas and Negative renewable natural gas will need to be eliminated.RNG can only be considered emissions-neutral(and not need to be eliminated)if it is consumed at the same rate at which natural sequestration occurs.This is not the case-natural sequestration of waste occurs much more slowly than humanity consumes natural gas.This burning(and fugitive release)of natural gas into the atmosphere greatly exceeds what the natural carbon cycle can reabsorb,meaning ultimately this is not an emissions-neutral solution. Net Zero Emissions for all community electricity by 2035. Key Implementation Tool:City Facilitates Development of Overall Impact: Approaches such as these are very effective ways for cities to act in the interests of the 100%Renewable Electricity for All Citizens with Utility and Positive whole community,including the marginalized and lower income citizens.Cities can chair PUC initiatives like this,set the agenda and boundaries of the discussions,and leverage The City reports that it continues to engage with PGE and with zoning,affordability,and(other)strategic policies to steer the discussion.They can also the Public Utilities Commission to develop an approach to ensure that the proceedings are transparently shared with the public. making 100%renewable electricity available to all residents at a fair price.80%of citizens indicate they're somewhat or very This in turn can achieve faster change in utility energy portfolios than individual interested in this. consumers purchasing renewable energy for their own use. Not specifically related to a goal Key Implementation Tool:Community engagement Overall Impact: Sites like these can be very effective at rallying a community,particularly youth,and also program:Beaverton Climate Challenge Positive centralizing branding for all of a city's programs,incentives,education,etc.This not only This program lets citizens sign up for the'challenge'and choose provides the City with an ongoing engagement forum,it works particularly well with actions from a catalogue that ranges from simple energy emissions-reduction activities such as consumption-based emissions that require efficiency improvements to offsetting air travel and buying home behaviour change.It also provides a number of citizens participating that can be quoted solar.The catalogue has useful sorting features,like whether the in annual reports as active participants in climate change initiatives. action is appropriate for renters,and how difficult,costly and time-consuming it is.Participants are awarded points based on Although annual progress is not reported,the total growing number of participants and the impact of the change,and leaders are shown on the home actions taken could be reported annually.The emissions impact of reported behaviour page of the website. changes could also be calculated and shared as part of justifying program expenditures. Key Implementation Tool:Urban Revitalization Overall Impact: Zoning and urban planning in general are an under-used tool in municipalities'tool kits The Development Division is working to promote and implement Positive with regards to reducing energy use and emissions.They can also be used to convert a urban revitalization,mixed-use planning and a housing strategy community's brownfields back into businesses and homes that provide property tax to help build a livable and equitable community for all Beaverton revenue and revitalize communities.The benefits of this work also includes not only residents.The city offers a variety of incentive programs to emissions reduction but health improvements and even increased attractiveness of the make this a reality,including$150,000 in grant funds available to city to workers and new businesses. assist redevelopment. In the first year of this initiative,Beaverton updated its Downtown Design Code to increase housing density,which is a change that increases the impact of lots of other emissions reduction actions. Key Implementation Tool:Solar Beaverton Overall Impact: These programs are excellent at helping new technologies become commonplace.Solar In 2011,the Solar Beaverton pilot project launched,offering bulk Positive is hardly new anymore,but it still isn't the norm.It's also worth noting that setting up a purchase discounts on residential solar installations to all whole community with solar systems is more effective at getting attention and helping Beaverton residents.Fifty households installed a total of 150kW solar become normalized than having them distributed throughout a city. of solar power and in 2017,the city offered a second version of the Solar Beaverton Program,with discounts on solar It's unfortunately that this program doesn't appear to still be in existence as the impact installations,advanced battery storage and smart thermostats usually grows with time.The number of installations,the amount of power generated for its residents. and the emissions reduced should all be tracked and reported on over time. Key Implementation Tool:Waste Reduction Overall Impact: Both of these are powerful waste reduction programs that can be designed to benefit Beaverton's Climate Action Plan includes two noteworthy items Positive lower income residents and contribute to the development of a circulate economy. for waste reduction:a deconstruction and salvage policy for Because waste currently makes up 5%of Tigard's emissions,and to align with the building demolition,and a Food Waste Strategic Plan,with a State's requirement to reduce food-waste emissions by 50%,these are both good related food scraps collection mandate. examples of programs that are pertinent to Tigard's own climate action planning. Key Implementation Tool:Library of Things(LoT) Overall Impact: Libraries of Things are an excellent,long-term approach to reducing consumption of The Library of Things(LOT)program provides a centralized Positive natural resources,reducing the waste from the planned obsolescence of appliances, library of a large variety of household items that can be shared and to reducing the cost of living for anyone willing to take advantage of the opportunity. rather than owned.In Beaverton they range from tools,to appliances,board games,and small electronics. Declared Corporate Goal: Carbon Neutral by 2030 -Includes scopes 1 and 2 of the City's corporate emissions. 50%fossil fuel reduction by 2030 relative to 2009 baseline. Key Implementation Tool:Smart Meter Installation Overall Impact: This is a program that falls into the"Reduce"category of actions,which is one of the Partner with PGE to install smart meters in buildings throughout Positive most direct and effective ways to reduce emissions.Rather than having to change the the city.Smart meters can transmit metered use data, type of vehicle or fuel used,simply eliminate the need to travel altogether.The result is eliminating the need for staff to travel to read the meters. the elimination of fuel used,emissions from the fuel,a reduction in time spent driving and a corresponding increase in work efficiency. Key Implementation Tool:Renewable Energy Purchase Overall Impact: Great!Ideally,this should be purchased with a stipulation that they pay for net new The city purchases 100%of its power from renewable sources. Positive renewable infrastructure so that the City can say that it contributed towards the whole State's grid becoming cleaner. Key Implementation Tool:Community Solar Project Overall Impact: Cities'abilities to offer larger facilities as pilot sites for combining technologies are a In addition to three solar installations at city facilities,in the first Positive great way of using community infrastructure to expedite community-scale solutions. year after the plan,they completed a pilot project combining a micro-grid and energy storage system. Key Implementation Tool:Replace Traffic Signals and Overall Impact: Replacing street,traffic,park and sportsfield lights with LEDs is a huge energy saver Streetlights with LEDs Positive and results in significant financial operational savings to every city.This should be at the More than 770 traffic signals and streetlights were replaced with top of every city's'to do'list because it's an immediate and long-term benefit that doesn't LED technology to reduce energy consumption,and save on inconvenience anyone.See Gresham's light replacement action below. energy cost and maintenance. Gresham Declared Community Goal: 2016 Per Capita Fair Share GDP Total Per Capita Fair Share Fair Calculated Fair Share 80%Emissions Reduction by 2050 Population: GDP Rating(>or< Emissions Emissions GHG Rating(> Share Fair Share 2050 Target Includes scopes 1 and 2 of community-wide $15,000/person) (tonnes) or<5.1 tonnes 2030 2030 Target emissions. /person) Reduction Target 110,042 $40,049 High 1,250,000 11.35929918 High -70%to- 375,000 Net zero 75% emissions Key Implementation Tool:The Green Business Program Overall Impact: This is a great idea.It's important to get businesses involved in the transition and to The Green Business Program provides customized strategies to Positive recognize them as leaders for doing so.This could be expanded to include teaching conserve water,reduce solid waste,wastewater,and wasted them to do GHG inventories,create climate action plans,and then follow through on energy,reduce pollution,change transportation patterns,and them. other environmental actions that reduce GHG emissions. Key Implementation Tool:Replace Traffic Signals and Overall Impact: This is very similar to Beaverton's LED Replacement program and is beneficial in the Streetlights with LEDs Positive same ways. The City's streetlight LED replacement project has reduced greenhouse gas emissions from streetlights by 85 percent and their energy use by 70 percent,and ensured the City met its 2020 goal of a 20%reduction in emissions relative to 2008.LED streetlights save Gresham$700,000 in electricity costs a year. Declared Corporate Goal: 80%Emissions Reduction by 2050 -Includes scopes 1 and 2 of the City's corporate emissions. Interim Goals: 20%Reduction by 2020; 40%Reduction by 2030; 60%Reduction by 2040 Key Implementation Tool:Transform Wastewater from High Overall Impact: This is an excellent way of reducing waste and emissions while taking advantage of the Energy Consumer to Energy Producer Positive liquid organics in wastewater that can be used as biogas to produce additiional power. The City's wastewater treatment plant was the City's highest Furthermore,it has saved ratepayers over$1 million a year since 2012. electricity user.The City installed a solar system,and systems to convert the plant's waste and byproducts into biogas used to produce additional electricity.Now it generates more than 100 percent of its own electricity. 100%Renewable Energy by 2030 Key Implementation Tool:Install Renewable Energy Overall Impact: Installing renewable energy systems on city facilities directly reduces the emissions Installations on City Facilities Positive generated from electricity production while reducing the city's long-term operating 47%of corporate electricity use is generated by renewable expenses,and so in turn,costs to taxpayers.It also contributes to developing a sector of energy systems installed on City facilities,including co- workers skilled in installing and operating these systems locally.And it increases the generation,wind and solar systems at the wastewater treatment total amount of renewable energy in the state-wide grid.This is an approach that is plant and wind and solar at City Hall.This is supplemented by clearly beneficial and demonstrates leadership. the purchase of renewable energy certificates. No Declared Community or 2016 2017 Per Fair Share GDP Total Per Capita Fair Share Fair Calculated Fair Share Corporate goals found** Population: Capita GDP Rating(>or< Emissions Emissions GHG Rating(> Share Fair Share 2050 Target $15,000/person) (tonnes) or<5.1 tonnes 2030 2030 Target /person) Reduction Target 2,500,000 $63,817 High Not available Cannot be calculated Net zero emissions 20%Per Capita Emissions Reduction from Cars and Small Trucks by 2035 There is very little information on Metro Portland's emissions or emissions reduction plans.The only available information includes the transportation goal provided,which was committed to in 2014,and for which there is no recent information on progress.That goal related only to transportation emissions,and according to some,relied heavily on vehicles converting to zero emissions models without any intervention of the metro administration. State of Oregon Declared Community Goal: 2016 2016 Per Fair Share GDP Total Per Capita Fair Share Fair Calculated Fair Share 80%Below 1990 Levels by 2050 Population: Capita GDP Rating(>or< Emissions Emissions GHG Rating(> Share Fair Share 2050 Target Includes scope 1 and 2 emissions for all $15,000/person) (tonnes) or<5.1 tonnes 2030 2030 Target communities within Oregon.Scope 3 is /person) Reduction(tonnes) unclear. Target 4,176,000 $45,049 High 37,700,000 9.03 High -70%to- 11,310,000 Net Zero 75% Emissions Intermediate goal of 45%below 1990 levels by 2035 Key Implementation Tool:Updating Building Codes to reach Overall Impact: It's positive that the State has recognized the need to embed a net zero energy in the Net Zero by 2030 Positive building code.This is the appropriate level for this requirement to be incorporated,rather The State Building Codes Division(BCD)has acknowledged than cities having to find ways to incentivize meeting this goal.However,this change that the minimum requirement for a new-building energy should be incorporated into the building code sooner.Buildings that are built to a lower efficiency must reduce energy use by at least 60%by 2030 standard will'waste'energy for the life of the building,effectively locking in emissions(if compared to 2006 Oregon residential and commercial codes. they are using fossil fuel energy)or placing greater demands on existing electric This amounts to new buildings being constructed to a net zero distribution infrastructure for many years.To avoid this,net zero energy should be standard by 2030.Commercial code and Reach code are being required in basic commercial and residential code by 2025. updated accordingly. Key Implementation Tool:Capping Industry Emissions Overall Impact:Intent Regulating industry to cap its emissions is the fastest governmental approach to The Climate Change Executive Order included a mandate to is Positive,Approach achieving emissions reduction in industry.However,reports on progress indicate that cap emissions from the State's largest emitters and to develop a and Results to-date the work underway is being diluted and undermined to the point of being ineffective.Oil program through which emissions could be traded. are Negative and gas representatives are focusing on encouraging innovation and adopting new technologies rather than on achieving solid reductions fast.Perhaps most harmful is the possibility that gas power plants may be excluded entirely from the mandate to cap and reduce their emissions. Key Implementation Tool:Improve Appliance Energy Overall Impact: This is useful.In particular,aligning standards across the North American west coast Efficiency Positive reduces the ability of manufacturers to challenge the standards and improves their Oregon Dept.of Energy(ODOE)is pursuing legislation to ability to build standardized replacement parts,and plan for future standards. improve energy efficiency standards for 11 types of appliances in such a way that the west coast from California to British Columbia will be aligned on minimum standards. Key Implementation Tool:Require Removal of Parking Overall Impact: This is an excellent strategy on the part of the State to give cities a mandate while Minimums Positive simultaneously giving them someone else to blame for a move that may initially be The State requires cities to remove minimum off-street parking unpopular.It's a great example of the State supporting municipalities in easy ways. requirements for all uses near frequent transit,and designate those areas for specific uses such as affordable housing, childcare facilities and small homes. Reduce emissions intensity of transportation fuels by 25%by 2035. Key Implementation Tool:Mandate Overall Impact: The need to remove ICE vehicles entirely,and replace them with zero emissions The State has mandated a reduction of the emissions intensity Positive alternatives as fast as possible means this initiative is more of an impediment than an of transportation fuels by 25%by 2035. aid to mitigating climate change. Reduce food waste by 50%by 2030. Key Implementation Tool:Mandate Overall Impact: This is an important move on the part of the State,particularly given that food waste is The State has mandated a reduction of food waste by 50%by Positive reported to be the second-highest source of emissions in some communities in Oregon. 2030. Passing the responsibility of how this is achieved to municipalities allows them flexibility but also relies on them to take action.So the success in achieving this goal may be variable. Have at least 250,000 EVs registered in Oregon Ily21)2111 5. Key Implementation Tool:EV Rebates Overall Impact: Although the rebates are helpful,they are likely not large enough to make these vehicles The State is offering a Clean Vehicle Rebate($2500),and a Positive affordable to all as quickly as is required.They may however be enough to achieve this Charge Ahead Rebate($5000)for vehicle chargers.As of target though,which amounts to 6%of Oregon's vehicles being EVs in 2025.6%by August 2022,there are 50,000 EVs registered in the state. 2025 is not the most ambitious target;however,if the State follows up with a 2028 or 2030 goal that is perhaps for a further 500,000 vehicles and continues escalating the goal in this way and also requiring the removal of ICEs,it may be effective. *Estimated based on Oregon's average per capita GDP. **Documentation from the City of Tigard indicates Portland Metro has the following targets but that they are not yet adopted: 2035:20%reduction;2040:25%reduction;2050:35%reduction. Recommended Low Carbon Actions to Achieve the Council Goal of Carbon Neutrality by 2035 MITIGATION BENEFIT ADAPTATION ACTION emissions reduction, BENEFIT cumulative btw 2023-2050 LAND USE 0 Low • Energy affordability 1. Beginning in 2023, increase the density of Tigard's new dwellings by 53,740 tons of emissions eliminatedEnergy efficiency shifting 80-90%of expected new, single-family homes to be duplexes while 1.7% of total reductions keeping the same distribution of building types(both residential and non There is a relationship between the • Community safety residential) among and within zones benefit of this action and others listed • Social resilience BUILDINGS 2. Require that by 2028, new buildings of all types are required to meet 00 Medium • Lower energy costs Passive House Standard, meaning they will require no more than 15 kWh/ 139,000 tons of emissions eliminated sq. yard for heating, cooling and plug use on average 4.3%of total reductions • Energy resilience 3. Renovate all existing buildings to reduce required electricity by 10%, and High • Lower energy costs thermal load by 40% in pre-1984 buildings, and by 30% in post-1983 • Improved health buildings. Begin in 2023, and complete 20%of all residences and 20%of non- 488,000 tons of emissions eliminated and comfort residential square footage by 2028, a further 30% by 2030, and the 15%of total reductions remaining 50% by 2035 • Energy resilience ENERGY • Lower energy costs • Improved health 4. By 2028, require all newly constructed buildings to use zero emissions 000 High and comfort systems for space and domestic water heatingand cooling. 260,000 tons of emissions eliminated . Energy resilience y p 8%of total reductions • Increased service stability 1 Specifically, in the Tigard Triangle,Washington Square and Downtown areas,90%of new,single-family homes were changed to duplexes; outside this area, 80%were changed to duplexes • Lower energy costs • Improved health and comfort; particularly as a High beneficial to 5. Replace all space and domestic water heating and cooling systems in 1,182,000 tons of emissions vulnerable existing buildings with zero emissions systems by 2035. eliminated populations 36.5%of total reductions2 because of air quality and temperature stability • Energy resilience 6. Scale up electricity generation from solar PV installations on both residential and non-residential building rooftops such that 50 MW of 00 Medium capacity are installed within the city boundary by 2035, and this increases to 64,000 tons of emissions eliminated 160 MW by 2050. 2%of total reductions • Local energy resilience 7. Establish community-based power purchase agreements, cooperative • Local economic power generation opportunities, or purchase enough renewable energy 00 Medium 63,000 tons of emissions eliminated development credits (RECs)for all remaining(i.e. not generated by local solar PV) 2%of total reductions between 2023 •electricity used by the community to be produced from zero emissions Grid stability sources.This action will be required to offset Tigard's remainingelectricityand 02040,when the grid is required to emissions until 2040. q g be 100% emissions-free • Eliminates waste and emissions 8. By 2030, ensure at least 10% of current fossil-fuel natural gas used in 00 Medium • Tigard is replaced with renewable natural gas. Increase this to 90% by 2035 71,000 tons of emissions eliminated Economic and replace the remaining 10%with hydrogen. 2%of total reductions opportunities for renewable natural gas and hydrogen 2 This is the highest single-impact action in the Plan. MOBILITY 9. Increase the combined transit and active transportation mode share to 20%of all trips taken by 2035. ➢ Increase the frequency and expand the transit network such that by 2035, 00 Medium 14% of all trips taken within and into/out of Tigard are taken on transit. 86,000 tons of emissions eliminated > Expand and maintain active transportation infrastructure such that by 3%of total reductions • Significant health 2035, 7%of all trips taken in Tigard are walked, biked, or made using benefits: $6 another form of active transportation. avoided health costs/$1 in active 10. Electrify the transit fleet providing trips to Tigardians in alignment with 0 Low transportation TriMet's goals to reduce emissions below 2019 levels by 70% in 2030, by 3,000 tons of emissions eliminated infrastructure 90% in 2040, and net zero by 2050 0.1%of total reductions • Reduced traffic congestion 11. Electrify the municipal fleet and equipment such that by 2028, 100%of LOW 36,000 tons of emissions eliminated • Reduced need for new vehicles or equipment purchased by the City for its operations is electric 1.1%of total reductions parking frees up land for other uses 12. Electrify personal and light-duty commercial vehicles such that by 2025, 000 High • Reduced noise 30%of new vehicles purchased are electric, rising to 90% by 2030, and to 349,000 tons of emissions eliminated pollution 100% by 2035 10.8%of total reductions 13. By 2025, ensure that 10% of all new medium and heavy-duty commercial 00 0 High vehicles purchased produce zero emissions (meaning they are replaced with 228,000 tons of emissions eliminated electric or hydrogen models). By 2030,this should rise to 90%of new vehicle 7%of total reductions sales, and to 100% by 2035 SOLID WASTE, RECYCLING, REUSE 14. By 2027, reduce total waste generated by 10%, concentrating on an • Reduced energy overall reduction in residential waste, as well as the re-use of construction use to produce new materials, recycling of scrap metal, and total reduction of food waste 00 0 High materials 167,000 tons of emissions eliminated • Reduced need to 15. By 2025, 64%of waste is diverted. This rises to 75% by 2030, and to 5%of total reductions import materials 100% by 2050 • Waste diverted to profitable RNG TREES • Cooling • Air and water purification 0 Low • Water capture 16. Beginning in 2023, plant and maintain 7,000 trees/year within Tigard, 52,000 tons of emissions removed during storm such that by 2035 there are at least 91,000 more (and by 2050, 189,000 2%of total reductions events more) healthy trees than there were in 2019 By 2035, new trees will sequester approximately 160 tons annually • Improved biodiversity • Increased access to green space AIS-5043 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 10/25/2022 Length(in minutes): 60 Minutes Agenda Title: Council Goal 1 Update Presented By: Unhoused Program Coordinator Sara Cooper Item Type: Update,Discussion,Direct Staff Public Hearing No Legal Ad Required?: Publication Date: 10/18/2022 Information EXPLANATION OF ISSUE The City Council will receive an update related to houselessness in Tigard.The briefing will touch upon serval actions underway,including: What we are currently doing: •Added capacity,team building •CHART •Communications •Monitoring and clean-up when able.Encampments,history and moving forward. Who we are partnering with: •WaCo-they'll provide an update annual report,and the direct benefits to Tigard. •Just Compassion-they'll provide an update of the work they are doing as well as plans for the future. Big picture:What we can do,are doing,and some of the challenges: •What can we do for those who do not want help?With Grants Pass being affirmed,we are limited on what we can do.We can only help those willing to be helped.We cannot displace unless there is available shelter within the community. Police's role is simply safety/criminal activity. •Questions for us to ponder: •How does Tigard increase available shelter space?Safe spaces/tiny villages/ own shelter?The chronically homeless? ACTION REQUESTED This is a briefing to Council and no action is needed,though direction and guidance are encouraged. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Key Facts and Information Summary The Goal 1 team is collaborating with internal teams on several projects including person-centric approaches to community building and public engagement,and the growth and development of CHART,the Community Houselessness Assessment and Response Team. Additionally,we will receive updates from two key partners,one local and one regional:Just Compassion of East Washington County and Washington County Supportive Housing Services. Each partner will answer the following questions: •How do we work together,e.g.how does the partner organization's mission,vision,and values support the forward movement of Council Goal 1? •What are three key accomplishments from the past year,and three opportunities for this year? •How has increased funding impacted the partner organization's services specific to the Tigard community? Council Goals,Policies,Approved Comprehensive Plans Strategic Plan Vision:Tigard: an equitable community that is walkable,healthy,and accessible for everyone. SP Goal 1,Objective 1.1:Be a high performing workplace with seamless service delivery Action C:Promote a values-driven organizational culture that reinforces inclusion and ethical behavior,exercises transparency and maintains the public trust. Action E: Create processes and coordinate communication to ensure consistent customer experience across service areas. SP Goal 1, Objective 1.2: Embrace data-informed decision-making to solve problems,pursue opportunities for improvement and develop innovative solutions for equitable outcomes. SP Goal 1,Objective 1.4:Enhance community awareness and engagement with City activities and services. ?SP Goal 3, Objective 3.4: Proactively intervene as necessary to meet the housing needs of all community members. ? 2021-2023 City Council Goals, Goal 1: Implement an actionable,person-centric,and regional response to homelessness. Dates of Previous Council Consideration 9/20/2016—Discussion on the City's role in addressing homelessness. 11/22/2016—Continued discussion from 9/20/16. 4/25/2017?—Task Force for the Homeless approved. 12/19/2017—Receive recommendations from Task Force for the Homeless. 4/20/2021 —Update to Council about the recent actions the city has taken to address homelessness. 4/27/2021 —Adoption of Council Goals,including?GOAL 1: Implement an actionable,person-centric,and regional response to homelessness. 8/10/2021 —Receive briefing on the Washington County Encampment Pilot Program. 8/24/2021 —Receive update on homelessness response. 8/9/2022-Receive Update on Goal 1 Objective: Hire Unhoused Program Coordinator ALTERNATIVES & RECOMMENDATION ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Attachments Presentation Washington County Presentation ...FI or .744 a• fdri' `r.44 ; , Tt ;t • Ily , :?►•c . . '' OC . iii,IIN 4 ., . _ .. . , .. a .,, 1 __ , _ . ....., , . 1.1 :1-: ,4 . it . '.4:'; ;I: al TIGARD ., . "illlrel F = pl. . c' ..._,. : N.life- Council Goal 1 ,i7 .... POLiC ._it j • �1 t' .1111;e1.-- s i,.,,____,...„,. QuarterlyUpdate - ."*.446r.„,,ti - --- __ ._, IA AY- fiw'� — — * _ • lc 6 Presented by the Goal 1 Team and our community partners at Just ,. ; Compassion and Washington County Supportive Housing Services .' ' ..a ,,,,,,..,-..0.,-.4 `: Y .. � �Y tier f l _ ` 0 t I aux--, '�'- ~ Ir r - , or ,,.b.,- -�lirap.)tW,s*Lt 4-4 �, '~.� ori '- f P r ti. - r • -i ' -•1_ r�� s " ., ,t. Y rte,-r J ! J! CityTigard Respect & Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done of TIGARD Council Goal 1 : Implement an actionable, person-centric, and regional response to homelessness. Person-centric means acknowledging, as we go about our work, that we are all human beings with hopes, dreams, and fears. It means knowing that our common ground lies in our mutual dream of a happy, healthy, thriving community that works together to care for its most vulnerable members. ! J! CityTigard Respect & Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done of TIGARD Primary elements of person-centric community building • Direct public engagement • Listening and responding • Transparency and integrity in communications • Earning public trust through meaningful direct response • Holding space for diverse perspectives • Willingness to engage on difficult subjects with respect, civility, and ,410v compassion Community Homelessness Assessment and Response Team CHART is an informal community group that CHART includes city staff, law enforcement, business and community leaders, nonprofit service and faith- -- — based partners, and members of the Tigard community. CHART Community Gathering ,Y, Every 3rd Wednesday at 11:00am \fr Please join us! N151 CityTigard Respect & Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done of TIGARD CHART: Action 1 Develop a Community Information and Resource Hub • Grow CHART and encourage diverse membership • Address accessibility and create equity • Provide opportunities for asynchronous communication and collaboration • Center voices with lived experience • Provide up-to-date information • Connect community members with resources and support • Hold space for community dialog More Internal Team Projects NCity ofTigard Respect & Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done TIGARD Encampment and Waste *\r] Management Safe Spaces Strategic Communications 1 \I FP- , irAi .1.6:47. • 44dit. . . Our Community Promise: 1\ Equity Environment .,dii - . Economy ,.... •1 -t y. ' s1 k Engagement . . • i 'It Excellent • 'moi7rref i F r f''� Rti 5 µ �� _ of .. 1 r ••r , 7 VI.IrAs-. -r, Ito , 1, -_, ... . • .1..? ..... . • .11 1..` r. -..,11:171.1:11 '4. - 0 1111 .1 '.. ...1' 4 Ofir ' .iv T •,..... 1,11 4 ...• v. V e'I - tit.-k-a." • ` it • - ply 11111 IR r +pc r .:i Illmii • - i , X11 {,� +� ,0 `� TIGARD e likl . ft. r _ _ liii. til tr I LLL , jili Tigard Strong ..j r . r ,. _.i . • , ... : 1 5 �,'2��GToN c�G 4 VO OREGOt% s S1 '� r _r j•L . . — Mme• ff- -4,--, • 4Jy � ,l !:• l, ti. as T ; .4. ',,, r t r. sl f t �r• yrs Washington County • ,: .� . :PO. ;P . ��;: ..y Agenda • Measure overview • Program updates • Questions and feedback from Tigard City Council washingtoncountyor.gov -* Supportive Housing Services Measure • Approved by voters May 2020 • Goal to achieve functional zero rate of chronic homelessness and create 5000 supportive housing placements across the region • Washington County receives 33% of program revenue • Eligible use of funds include outreach, shelters, housing programs, employment, wrap around supports and flexible assistance for individuals • Program began July 2021 washingtoncountyor.gov SHS Annual Report First year in review • Building a system of care • • Network of community-based isfi J � --1/4,..:. 4 providers '� -- • Standardized and equitable .- gr -._ , contracting • Training and technical assistance er ,L .::i.;-! .•11,•g:I'.),*-Z. -4.- ...- t , `t E. - tS _' Vit` - X13 % Program participant Donna moved into housing in May washingtoncountyor.gov with the help of Easter Seals case managers! SHS Annual Report Ali 111, "One of our winter shelter participants was an r expecting single mother struggling with her I' mental health. disk4. MIER _ , Through case conferencing with health partners, we were able to connect her with appropriatel!!" 1 , ti 9 iii i, , pre-natal care, collaborate to provide ongoing mental health support, and connect her with '� post-natal care during her time in shelter. Iam proud to say that she is now stably housed - _ •_ __. l A t and doing well." :UPS 4AV .„3,..;iO 111...111. Alit _+ a.- -Yesenia, Family Promise of Greater Washington County washingtoncountyor.gov 5 SHS Housing Programs Year 1 goal* achieved: - r44_ r • Launched: Housing Case Management Services (HCMS) • Launched: Regional Long Term Rent ,. li Assistance (RLRA, "Arta") ,x • 305 formerly homeless households Y 'x' placed in permanent and supportive 4 . housing 'N-...,_ *Program goal was adjusted midyear from 500 to 300, on account of delay in housing placements Program participant Manny moved into housing with the help of Project Homeless Connect case managers and an RLRA voucher! washingtoncountyor.gov 6 SHS Housing Programs Allk MI Year 2 expansion: !Fr _,„ . _, • Rapid Rehousing (RRH) and Rapid _ } Resolution (RR) to serve Population B7. ' 411f ` • Landlord Liaison program ,i: • 400 + households already `shopping' 4 , for apartments • Goal: Serve 900 more households t` ; ti� i - ,,-;.:.::s4 _ - 416` . __ ,, Dora moved into her apartment in November 2021 with the help of Greater Good Northwest washingtoncountyor.gov Supportive Housing CapacityIlllkMI 1800 • Placed Supported 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 IP 111 200 0 20/21 21/22 22/23 Goal 23/24 Goal System goal washingtoncountyor.gov SHS Annual Report allik 1111, - "Without this program, I don't know .-.. ....:_ , ; . where we'd be right now. = . . .i.vi _ It's great to wake up in your own house -; - :-_` k. and know it's just you, and you don't _ , - , �. =�� -� .. . have to worry about anyone else. To - - �� know that you're okay and you're going rd. -- tobeokaY I feel like every addict needs to know --- ,-, AL there is another way out, and there's a way they can live and be happy, clean Kahneeta Atkin moved into permanent, affordable housing with her family over the summer and sober." washingtoncountyor.gov SHS Shelter Programs Ali Year 1 goal achieved: • 100 new year-round shelterlull hitt '.*N-No\ -.11 .. -1=14 e bedsI� �f, ' �-�- `�u l Year 2 expansion: .� 'kilo l'l ab I , i s ':" I• :R, • 40 bridge shelter beds (Tigard) '' ' ■-� I is �j �.� r dye Ili 1r 14 ;f' ',_.., ,,, • 30 village pods (Hillsboro) _:. `� '`= +' 40- ii • 150 winter shelter beds (dispersed) `� • $7.5 million capitoI fund Jenny Aguirre, and Hillsboro Bridge Shelter tour for housing leaders washingtoncountyor.gov SHS Shelter Programs Atit CLO�ii MILL Forest Grove ®arnelius F'. HillsboroWest Haven-Sylvan Elmonica REEDVILLE Cedar Hills West Slope Aloha rsiuomuig Beavert 0 = Current shelter location Raleigh Hills 0 = Winter shelter location -iazeida►e . Garden Horne-Whitford = Future shelter location (Beaverton and Hillsboro sites ETA 2024) Metzger Tigard T Kinton 11 Google My Maps -* ShelterSystem C aillk MI 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 ,/))/A ) ///lij di 0 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 Goal Winter only • Bridge Shelter • Congregate Shelter • Alternative Shelter washingtoncountyor.gov 12 SHS Outreach Program Ilk NI Year 2: =41:fashutgtun c ~.r.1 ,,,a 7 Rockcreek • NEW program ! 1.-0, ..0 ., wneli 0 e"e %nit. 1110 • Outreach workers connect unsheltered residents to shelters and housing d_ n°° programs 4. Li.ffn iDive Hili ia 0 • Coordinate with Encampment laurelwood SNLaurel Rd eu„ 1 "ounlaill Management Program (EMP) r • ryalem 1...., To I .n oe J Nat Ref Tualatin I.'1 • 16 outreach workers in teams of two t Sherwood 1 1 t i I washingtoncountyor.gov 13 SHS Outreach Program :: , • N•7'. ;',7 ;/ . ' ...•...,' , :;:it' 'll'. .,' ' V ' r am truly humbled to be =•r �r "yam yam,. , F •-..• .:t T R " .j allowed into peoples' lives. �: f 1i, '`' y' =c. 4r ."! Everyone's storyis different." ` � .: �`._- Y .: r - Tory Gonzalez, Outreach Worker for ; 'Pre AV ' V • � y ''- Project Homeless Connect `:.` ilii . , s*.. • yfr i rylk !!Tory seemed trustworthy to me. She sees how we live and _.. `` ' 116 what we need." - Jeff, recently housed program i , participant ; washingtoncountyor.gov „.i. . SHS Systems I aillik NW Year 1 & expanding in Year 2: • Launched: Housing Liaison Pilot • Underway: Lived Experience Workforce Pilot • Underway: PSH integrated with affordable housing bond • Aloha Inn, Viewfinder and more • Underway: Welcome Home Kits and building a volunteer network washingtoncountyor.gov SHS Service Network illk NW Shelter HCMS Housing RRH Outreach Community-Based Partners Provider Program Liaison Program Provider 1. X X X 2. X X X • 21 service provider organizations 3. X X 4. X X X • 6 culturally specific 5. X X 6. X X • Cross-program coordination X X X X X 8. X X X • Universal program standards and 9. X X 10. X X X training 11. X X 12. X X X 13. X X 14. X X X X 15. X X X 16. X X 17. X X X X 18. X X X X 19. X X X 20. X washingtoncountyor.gov 21. X X SHS Equity Analysis Ali 111, Year 1 Findings: • Households served proportionate to population in need • Culturally Specific organizations serve more households of color • Data quality technical assistance needed for partners Year 2 Improvements: • REALD data values and quality improvements • Expand number of and capacity for culturally specific organizations • Expand housing programs that serve more households of color washingtoncountyor.gov SHS Equity Analysis Black or African %of Total Served _10% Race • American alone %Unserved 9% %Below Poverty 1.15% %of County Population 12% American Indian and %of Total Served 1 2% Alaska Native alone %Unserved 4% %Below Poverty 1 1% %of County Population 11% Native Hawaiian and %of Total Served 3% Other Pacific Islander %Unserved 2% alone %Below Poverty I 0% %of County Population 10% Asian alone %of Total Served 1 2% %Unserved 1% %Below Poverty _9% %of County Population _11% Two or more races %of Total Served =7% %Unserved 7% %Below Poverty _9% %of County Population _7% White alone %of Total Served 74% %Unserved 74% %Below Poverty 66% %of County Population 74% Hispanic or Latino origin %of Total Served 41% Ethnicity, (of any race) %Unserved 33% %Below Poverty 37% %of County Population -21% White alone,not %of Total Served Hispanic or Latino %Unserved 67% 18 washingtoncountyor.gov %Below Poverty 63% %of County Population 79% -* SHS Revenue and Expenses illk Mr • Program Costs $25 Million One-time Planned 5H5 Investments 50,000,000 • Shelter Services 4 45,000,000 40,000,000 ■ Housing 35,000,000 Supports 30,000,000 • Rent Assistance 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 Capacity • Stability Reserves Building • Program reserves 10,000,000 • Shelter Capital Fund 5,000,000 ■ Regional Investment Access Center Capital Fund ° Fund • PSH Capital Fund FY 21/22 actual FY22/23 budgeted washingtoncountyor.gov 19 SHS Annual Report /11 \I ,. . 41) "To anyone who needs it this ---� program is where it's at! It has helped change my life; I now have t a new Life ! I am able to take care fli# ;• of myself now, mentally now • Ilki physically. It's changed my life." ' 1 i t, -Colbert "Best Smile" Willis moved into permanent, affordable housing in May i 41P11° washingtoncountyor.gov 20 SHS Year Two Goals 'V Work Plan Goals: FY 22/23 Year 1 Year 2 Total outcomes goals Supportive Housing Placements (Population A) 305 500 805 Outcomes Rapid Rehousing Placements and Rapid Resolution Assistance - 600 600 (Population B) Community-based housing workers (Outreach, housing navigators, retention) 38 72 110 Capacity Project-based PSH capacity - 100 100 Year-round shelter capacity 100 75 175 washingtoncountyor.gov Questions and Feedback Mr Please inquire or share comments ! 0 [Z—j washingtoncountyor.gov