Loading...
Plans `/c 75 ,g �d: *if/Y ok I I , r , a' ° x,u n•. 1 i 1,1. n' 1 fIt I 1' l.;r� - • • _� 1 . 9 ■�Y . I , , ® .®.,�.aESPHI . I Ilk�'A a1 .�®moo= „ ii ��i �i�iis cii�' ] x Itt'�--Xss- xss S ssx _-ssx SSX ssx—s 1 XSS NI >Es xs x55 xss , xs'1 sI1 • � SW JEAN LouISE RR_ 1■ � 1p 11�M��1 „��, �- xs5 _ -g ,> -dsx I osx,�' esx 1pp �I� xwD 09 xw xw xw xw xw. ...{ xwx EI s W. �'�.• xw U, >2: min xw •9 -.;X 1a , ---ty . v- ' fi..,,,. - }\- xw -1-X...., m 1 xlA xs „ x., ,. xvr ,. lilies x _\ 1101 /` �\ 4:�.>�® ,:®� =�' .a`ra. IIILISIII ••\ j �.moRIRMENR�u�rle® n'�i�rrl y. II v ®Riverside Homes .n a �I 1 dr v �jv a, ,', 10 A ar ri x hx i� 4% I ' 3 n j� X 7■s■ QII! I II SSag L 1 1 1 11 11 3 „�`�wx� ' 'l` ;A� ,y 'XxX [T]503-941-9484 [F]503-941-9485 111 , ' 04 a1Pump N -. -.__ ' • -.i,I V T ._ - _ _ ie �T DATE: 3/15/2021 ;III � y g H MN ,\ - ��e ` � Lomb I_I �� _ 1 Eft 11 , II i — .3 SF i x% REVISIONS / -269 \ 51h°7� — \ --^/ - __ ' -- — /- \ - \� X / / I I NO. DATE DESCRIPTION , ,// ";; i A -- I I / // / / / ///,/ ' No v ���---� - z�>fi; I',I \ \ -'--. ,/--/----- VL-*' / / — //* z / / / ' /j / / 1 / // / / --- t ;z / // / /-' j / / / // / ,/// / / - ` — Ex1sTnlGmwcTunEs Barn I 7 ` g x. - / / / , / TO BE SF r_ , ,r / \\ ; / / l i one well hoousetureto be \`` ..� X TYP- __'_ _. , I \ i o Three rHouse " removed. \ / COSTING STRUCTURES b y �1�0- i /' // i \ l l / \,) 1 / i /I l � ` 1; 2170SF __ ,,.., , / -/ I f / / I 1 1 I �. / / �// /I I I I 11 II I I r <, I I "' v vvx / - TO BE REMOVED � I ---- ��- \ 1 \ \ J x TYP. / - \ I \ °\ z I II I \ \ �' X - 11 v - 1 I Septic tank location v` v v \ �v �i I I }} _' fi -•'l +`�-i �'--zse-_/ �v ze \ �\ I A\ \\ \\\ \\ \ V -\ _ _ - -- '/�..,x •-x.._ �,mrt TO BE �I I I�: _ _ - - j�� ��T� Septic field location // EX.FENCE TO BE zss�`\N �, \ I 'N \ `\. l\ \ \ \\\�\`` \ _\ \ \ F �.� i- _ f-- DR REWAaY PAVEMENT- ' e t 11, E --- RELOCATED - ' I 1.,= \ A 1 1 _ DBE I __ \; RIVERSIDE \` \ — _ Pole Barn AT SCHOLLS - L i - /' \ --- /�, SF i MEADOW A v I r�� /� M `I \ \ y\ I \ ^� ,\ 1 '-_� .. - `EX.FENCE TO BE _ _ I .:� PLANNED 1 1 \ \ \ x_.,._ REMOVED _ - p I ® .. \ I ,' -" -m __ -- - — —_ / -X-- n - DEVELOPMENT T I , SEP 2 s 202 fiw' . v\\>,........_,,,r,...,} :-''--- - ! CITY OF TIGARL Low 4t,Ct ve I ;� BUILDING DIVISION [ K r��0trr"I EXISTING 0\aki �l'X it I 1 yt CONDITIONS BA- Firilit COP't N LEGEND APPROVtD ,, 1 EXISTING SIDEWALK EASEMENT LINES xss EX SANITARY SEWER 0 EX SANITARY MANHOLE GI EX BLOW OFF EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY xs0 EX STORM DRAIN 0 EX SANITARY CLEANOUT E EX AIR RELEASE VALVE I I EXISTING PAVEMENT - — EXISTING CENTERLINE my EX WATER LINE 0 EX STORM MANHOLE ot EX GAS VALVE - r" �EXISTING GRAVEL EXISTING PROPERTY LINE XX EX GAS LINE 0 EX AREA DRAIN © EX CABLE RISER Lk X[ EX TELEPHONE RISER $ I- :,I EXISTING BUILDING _ EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE EX BURIED POWER LINE ❑ EX CURB INLET C) a __ _ -Dz<--- EX 2-FOOT CONTOURS %0N EX OVERHEAD POWER LINE 0 EX STORM CLEANOUT S EX LIGHT POLE M,• �' I EXISTING - -sm- - EX 10-FOOT CONTOURS XCDAX- EX CABLE TV LINE 7,b EX FIRE HYDRANT EX TREES P.�4� :II I il E "' "' NON-JURISDICTIONAL I I EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER Xi* EX TELEPHONE LINE s EX WATER METER WETLAND TO BE FILLED X EXISTING FENCE • EX WATER VALVE PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN 1 FILLED WETLANDS EXISTING WATERS • EX TREES TO BE REMOVED --� I�, 12564 SW Main Street - - Tigard•OR 97223 11 x 17 scale [T]503-941-9484 CITY OF TIGA D 11'=100 PROJECT NO.: 144-001 Approved byPanning TYPE: PLANNING m r �/ � ' G REVIEWED BY PRE Date: / s ,,, & initials: SCALE (yItIGl I 50 —5 50 1 INCH-50 FEET 2 o$ F • j r� I„ I I 1 � 1- 1 XS= I ._SW JEAN LOUISE RD _ - rr 1-� X�:s �C5>--x55 Y.55—'� Ssz SSX Ssx— SSX—L�: X55 Iu5 X Y.55 X55 X5`; IF`S--IT'-Xsi -5e # T j 4X55 Xs - DES 55 w I , i ?ii 1 j i — -so - - - - . ,—ds<--I ,sx — „sir —.csx ,-- DSX-1 135x'1 "Fs% asx —4 JS,. ins �{�asx { r--asx 's� x XW, xW XV; xW- Yon %Y.'- XW XY' X X.Vl %t4' %V' 4.:W' XN.'.` to F ar - )V-' i % Y.W YU5 XW XW -XK W� M }µ' pX�:' i =.++.; � i ._. c---} x 11 - - ! >rc .x x x „ x ©Rivlerside Homes C 1 n ) )oc - ‘It x Ivy 1 ��'r0,- 7 Ix X< a g P i<.I . �o r ,Vie,. x % if (T)503-941-9484 [F]503-941-9485 x w, _� x a x_k n v _xl .. 3 1 I, .N 3 II ,, 1" 5 ;' I II DATE: 3/15/2021 3 Ir _ I �, X -'" / /I �� .a m-.- _ '`,\,._ - _ - - _. - xI REVISIONS / ,�--. $� -- - — ��kip / — — 5,.�. — — _ _\I i\ _ zn JC-- .ice :-+ >-' / _� .-_ C— ` _ -"_-_/ a,'-__ // _...%�q/-/=_ _�/_P%=___i4_ ,\_\- /-\ \- --- \-`x // ' \\ -5�I I NO. DATE DESCRIPTION •• \ //' / / // / / / / / / / / , - —— \ �' x \ ..••. Z 2 \ . / - / /-- I / / /' ' /' //' / // / , \ \ Install EC silt fence / :- EXISTING STRUCTURES \\ ;,,,, -4•p x / / / / / / /' \ - TO BE REMOVED- �� u �_, / �\ J / / // // / / / / , / \ nP. x x x,cx-�: ' /' � / / / / — x xzlif 1- _i/ / // v �/ / / / / vv I v v ' -- x-- — '�k Use existing driveway X- / / - 1 1 ( l / ' 1 r , y- t{'-�\ �":� _/ //// / I (1 (/ //r/�/J J ( 1 \\ �\ '� /sr `\ f // EXISTING STRUCTURES ) r as construction "..,t, / -'+h �_/1 / I \ 1 1 I 1 \ \ ( / f 1 �\ \` - ,', < ` • TO BE REMOVED [ I entrance i ^� tie l _ I l / 1 1 1 A i, A v �� �;� e- -- 1 1 1 \ \\ l \ \ \ \\ \\ \ c \ \\ \ \ \ z �,, +T r EXISTING STRUCTURES l 'I ,! i h i \ ? '°, \ \ / f TO BE REMOVED -ki ill -/ / 1 irk/ //`v V A a �'1 �V A\ \\ \V -. v.• / - / - _- I � zea- - - )* / ' : V ( \- \ `, `\ �.. _ - /mil•_•< CONCR RR VPAV2'3EMENT-• I 1 4. { x. \i / \ / \ I \ \ \ x✓ ...' 1 1. / - 1� •%' I \' ! /1 �.a / EX.FENCE TO BE {v, \255� / CI', \ \ \\ \ �\ \ \ \ - - __ - ..i �,i�-,i- _.., DID xF J.yxT RIVERSIDE / ' RELOCATED ., \ {'y-�s} I \ 1 1 �\ ` `� \ u` - / ---- s•' 706E REMOVED _L-- II AT SCROLLS v / \1 I x MEADOW `- 1,, / /�,_ , W'1 1 \ \ l �„ r '\..--- '� __- - - 1\1--IX.FENCE TO BE - �- g ;a ''/ ate _ \\ �.\ -�" \ _ <— REMOVED li x-enz_ I,; �� I PLANNED - \ I EC 'L,—M /, ��� �, �,� —— --' __ - Instal silt fence DEVELOPMENT „ , Q, — -- -c_ EVELOPME / -- / SEP 2 2UZ's t c --2<a_ CITY OF TIGARU LOCIaltAn �� • BUILDING DIVISION (}(BSI •k' ATCP °` > �L(hv✓' % I 1 Dem1 EC o of n for as,E ` Structures b LEGEND 1 EXISTING SIDEWALK EASEMENT LINES xSS EX SANITARY SEWER CO EX SANITARY MANHOLE 01 EX BLOW-OFF 17 EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY xSD EX STORM DRAIN 0 EX SANITARY CLEANOUT EX AIR RELEASE VALVE EXISTING PAVEMENT - EXISTING CENTERLINE xW EX WATER LINE O EX STORM MANHOLE EX GAS VALVE dTi FL h, ks1 �'z El GRAVEL EXISTING PROPERTY LINE XG EX GAS LINE EX AREA DRAIN © EX CABLE RISER W I xEEX TELEPHONE RISER l ':' EXISTING BUILDING = EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE EX BURIED POWER LINE ❑ EX CURB INLET --sz<--- EX 2-FOOT CONTOURS XOH IX OVERHEAD POWER LINE 0 EX STORM CLEANOUT '} EX LIGHT POLE F,.,.", u, EXISTING -sN- - EX 10-FOOT CONTOURS —Xca" EX CABLE TV LINE V EX FIRE HYDRANT EX TREES p......simi) ` J NON-JURISDICTIONAL 1 .,�EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER XI EX TELEPHONE LINE ® EX WATER METER PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN WETLAND TO BE FILLED —X EXISTING FENCE • EX WATER VALVE J FILLED WETLANDS I',: :,1 EXISTING WATERS _- EX TREES TO BE REMOVED � y c -- - 12564 SW Main Street - Tigard,OR 97223 11 x 17 scale I�503-941-9484 1"=100 PROJECT NO.: 144-001 TYPE: PLANNING M G REVIEWED BY: PRE o SCALE 50 0 25 50 2 _ _ _ _ 1 INCH=50 FEET 1 � __ I I L' -_ . _ �I - -_- -__ —__—_-. - J LI ;\ — 0 - Riverside Homes w "/ -\ i c 1, `Area shaded in gray r~ ' depicts general location of ;i _ I , ' J _ 'I I [T]503-941-9484 [F]503-941-9485 structures. • •: i, ' t - }}1 f • , }. ii`s#s! DATE•. 3/15/2021 i �: - _ REVISIONS I I -F: ,, I j . 1 ,: I j L, I - !. 1 ' , 1 ,_..- NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 3`-` s, 1 l � 11 , ? 'I( I � �, ll( �} I C' i l I+;. 2 - - } TREE STANDI - "if\• '� A�t _ �9� ) I .r C } I I r j AREA=124,825 SF - . Rf `1,„.**5-,_ TREE STAND 4 I} ; — ,1 y € AREA=11.477 SF r1,-,t-r - i.-{ ,. 1 1 I 1. MAPPED SIGNIFICANT '{ I ' 1iO.� I �, TREE GROVE s I f. I,,' !%d/jl -1 I l LOWER VALUE HABITATII 1 I � ,.,, 1 I [ _—__._ -_ .{ I I---- -_--. AREA=302,977 SF ���r� .1�• �4. f -___.---_,.t.,;,,...._=:: In • 1 I L: ` r� ,. HEET173 k '` _ a� i] (� I TSEE S SEE SHEET 17.4 1 I _ ,, �l Ei% , sEESHEET1i.z } � �ii /CI • � - /' 1 t ' ti TREE STAND 23. I ___ - 1 ` -1 , •. a > �'] 4�\ ♦♦ AREA•68,0105F L.....,,,,,, ��'�,. V • ( ,I - 7.7 •.il :i : k-_.._.-; '.. ,,. � -:,._ �'`, '-_ _ t TREE STAND 3 A _ ;� . # ti A.A 146805E _ RIVERSIDE "`,IJ, - ♦ �' „„ e,, , -:... 4" S}}}},t 1y;, !.1.,t 1 s:t}fllffi ;iJ1+f1 Wi tli :q}}t1' "1f }ll}Fe AT SCROLLS �' j h` " . .' r ,. != ,>`♦ % • ,i; "Cf_.— `I r r4" f.l'' 1 I MEADOW ♦ \ _ y ^f DEVELOPMENTD --ter '' ' 1 I � � - s, ' -7r - - l�` � Li _ L J RECEIVED LEGEND SEP 2 9 2021 I DECIDUOUS CITY OF TIGARD CONIFEROUS 3UILDING DIVISION x X EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED /---:' /-\ DRIPLINE OF EXISTING TREE OUTSIDE OF \\/I\`/1 STAND BOUNDARIES I TREE I TREE PROTECTION FENCING PRESERVATION 00 PER DTL 1,SHEET 17,1 TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. TREE PROTECTION ZONE.THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE(TPZ)SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AT PLAN 170824 1 TREE NUMBER THE DRIPLINE OF PROTECTED TREES AS A MINIMUM.THIS IS APPLICABLE TO TREE#71690 E LOCATED NEAR THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROJECT SITE.PROTECTION FENCING FENCE SHALL IDEALLY BE _ MAPPED SIGNIFICANT TREE GROVE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM 26-FOOT RADIUS FROM THE PROTECTED TREE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND REMAIN IN PLACE AND IN GOOD REPAIR UNTIL WORK IS " LOCATED AT THE OUTER COMPLETED IN THIS AREA. PERIMETER OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE.SEE TREE R 111 NOME 111TREE STAND 2. PROTECTION FENCING.TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL CONSIST OF 5-FOOT TALL DRIP LINE PROTECTION PLAN THIS 2-INCH MESH CHAIN LINK OR WELDED WIRE FENCING SECURED TO 1.5-INCH DIAMETER I SHEET f LOWER VALUE HABITAT STEEL OR ALUMINUM POSTS PLACED NO FURTHER THAN 8-FEET ON CENTER AND SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF THE TPZ. 3. PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE.THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL BE ON SITE TO DISCUSS ( 8' Iu METHODS OF TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PROTECTION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 4. TREE REMOVAL.TREES IDENTIFIED FOR REMOVAL THAT ARE LOCATED ON PROPERTY • �• TYP N BOUNDARIES AND OFF-SITE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT SITE SHALL NOT BE • ••���8i=�� >? REMOVED WITHOUT THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER'S PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. - ❖ •� 111111111411:11 I,MORGAN HOLEN,ATTEST THAT THIS TREE PRESERVATION THE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE TEMPORARILY OPENED AT TREE#71690 FOR TREES 5'CHAIN LINK FENCING. IP...../"."---. - AND REMOVAL SITE PLAN MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS IN UFM FELLED,#71961 AND#71692 TO BE REMOVED.THESE TREES SHALL BE DIRECTIONALLY CRITICAL ROOT ZONE 2'MESH CHAIN LINK OR PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN FELLED USING CHAINSAWS(NO TRACKED MACHINERY)WITH CAUTION TO AVOID DAMAGE TO BE PROTECTED WELDED WIRE a SECTION 10,PART 1. TO THE PROTECTED TREE AND THEIR STUMPS SHALL REMAIN IN THE GROUND.LOGS AND SECURED TO 1-1/E DIA WOODY DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PROTECTION ZONE AND THE TREE 12564 SW Main Street 2 PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE CLOSED ONCE TREE FELLING IS COMPLETE IN THIS AREA. O1 TREE PROTECTION DETAIL STEEL OR ALUMINUM POSTS Tigard,OR 97223 5. TREE PROTECTION ZONE MAINTENANCE.THE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL NOT BE (NOT TO SCALE) [T]503-941-9484 MOVED,REMOVED,OR ENTERED BY EQUIPMENT EXCEPT UNDER DIRECTION OF THE 11 x 17 scale PROJECT ARBORIST. 73 6. STORAGE OF MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE MATERIALS 1"=100 PROJECT NO.: 144-001 OR EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE TPZ. TYPE: PLANNING m 7. TREE PROTECTION INSPECTION.THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL INSPECT AND VERIFY THE .1 LOCATION OF PROTECTION MEASURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,MONITOR TREE PROJECT ARBORIST: G REVIEWED BY: PRE MORGAN HOLEN,CONSULTING ARBORIST PROTECTION MEASURES AT LEAST ONCE EVERY OTHER WEEK WHEN WORK IS ON-GOING _ ISA BOARD CERTIFIED MASTER ARBORIST(PN-6145B) NEAR THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE,AND PROVIDE WRITTEN REPORTS TO THE CITY MORGAN HOLEN&ASSOCIATES, LLC. ISA TREE RISK ASSESSMENT QUALIFIED FOLLOWING EACH INSPECTION. n 8. FINAL REPORT.AFTER THE PROJECT HAS BEEN COMPLETED,THE PROJECT ARBORIST MORGAN HOLEN, CONSULTING ARBORI ST• DATE: SHALL PROVIDE A FINAL REPORT THAT DESCRIBES THE MEASURES NEEDED TO MAINTAIN SCALE (P]971-409-9354 50 0 25 50 17 ■ AND PROTECT THE REMAINING TREES AND CONFIRM THAT NEW TREES HAVE BEEN 11 m EI MORGAN M H OLE N.COM ..PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED TREE CANOPY SITE PLAN. I 1 INCH=50 FEET ■ L If : 1 y I 1 11710;01 I i . R Riverside Clam E1335117068411 706831 N. / �/ �'• 71074 4.#. I \, 706881 • a :. , •,/ fila .•. <� ® ® 1 [T]503-941-9484 [F]503-941-9a85 0696 • t Demo permit not �11T/ `t --- .. DATE: 3/15/2021 '-{]06981 �X707151 * "MI "7181 )70689[ . 11-' requesting Or requiring p07141� i .1 _ —•---- I• 1_I ----. _ -- - - - — _ ' REVISIONS 707271 ® ® 707191 ■ .� ,I a i� \i --- �' J ® % NO. DATE DESCRIPTION tree removal. Providing XJ075� � 410, ■ . �� exhibit to demonstrate • Mal i 737Eliirl 707401 a II® :_ 1 1 _ 1® -- - _-.-- --- � no tree protection ® - 707471 _..® -- 707411 --- I' i 1 �•�, / \_ I 0 planned for future 7D746 '� •� y I 1 ' 441L...+ =--,--- i--- ---- -- 0 development/PFI. WEN J {7Dibz ,:4® it II I� • �[ j 7107 �,71093 / _.—_ -`' O 170759 t e . 76766 M t .. 11:1 _.._ \ 1\ / io, . 70777 7o7b0" -. /fib I / / , Y\ \`, I ,,,,/ // •.-" 73 1 L-J Tons® - 1 ! �� i 6 x el 1 ` '!� i/ TREE STAND 4 70774 •� m 1 '® 1X 709211 �\ / I 4 / 1 _ \1 { ---' - AREA=11,477 5� II K , 70923709221 I1 .I 1\ '- I ' % a_ i X708�70806I 70809 708y171 709171 y*� \ /�/ I�--\ \ I III �'�j,. -. ]Oats T C1 .� 70926I ' < \N // — --\1,- — - 'j ' LEGEND I 70808 70812 1.: 70816 170818 - _ _-- I I 1 I e�.. I I I 170819 ■ ' ' *�' 1 I I 1 DECIDUOUS • IM1IEEE ung I� ;MID 1\ +F --/ /1 — RIVERSIDE 70456 7044Q ---- \ 3`\ // CONIFEROUS 170447 a40 i 69 — \ ___ 4 X X AT SCHOLLS 70469I� .-,_1704661 - - 1 '®' `, / \ - - -- 1 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED C X X IFP� II0 �I 1704681 ](- F s � . • ;I I) i t 'i 3.1 /�� /�` DRIPLINE OF EXISTING TREE OUTSIDE OF MEADOW ,f -{704641 I70450�� .V� n ,I }I I \ 1\ 1 STAND BOUNDARIES IIDL 170460 IMm Ma * • ,1 1 /I PLANNED ,� ,-17o4581 704461 7o4a1 - t I o �•� ®- - ,// ® 1® I ICI , C) TREE PROTECTION FENCING DEVELOPMENT 70915 70496 Y® 1110113 ; "9 • ' 'v T l ;/ I \\J PER DTL 1,SHEET 17.1 t' I.1�4 ® ®._ I -_ 703761. 70439 ._.__• _� �..:._ �� � ,__ --__ --_ - _ {III: 170824 I TREE NUMBER 7JJ70914] EM 7oa75 .MI 9 /--17038® 1®I� 111 • 6e� u a • 1 `•II a - - r MAPPED SIGNIFICANT TREE GROVE 1, 709121 703981 X }' I _ x ,� [7047b 70423 X703751 1 1 � I �I TREE STAND ®NEM70400 ,704031 703841 ]03781 70173170372 -1--,, a_ T= _:/�. �''`, _= 4 -_ — ,1 1 1 I xik T IMI IV 70428 �(�-(7042910401 1 70371 - a 70900 ]049970901A ' .' ® 70396 , _ ` •L / -\ , __ _--- II . 71048 70374 '��I\/e -�- '�' �^ SEP 2 9 Z021 7o9n ® ® , ' 7o3so 7o3z9 _ e ' '111� I , �710471 5 . 170395 ® _ \ /* I ` \\,._____.// TREE STANDR 'I %I 170477 II]� .71°4S 70910 70478,. Nam /' �® ; ` li3 13 I ' CITY OF T{GAR�7 7033a ,� i AREA=14,680 SF I �% 1]09@70/90 170991 - 170393 ®-_ ;® ; , ,. 11 aUILDIPIG DNISInh, 1710441 Iic 8 1� m/y�{703321 • � yam ,ii % TREE .70909 170489UU 49 704aE1 1® , �//,,_I1704171 70339 ��oin ®,IIIIII 70-241 11 .; .. '..�-..--r•...A.. ...... f^a j•,',, PRESERVATION Y I� Oa 70337 a' - 7032���/ • �70908 70903 '}'� /� `� \ y70416I ,04D61 �. :\ ti i� 1 % PLAN 170474E 70408 _® / 7�z61 \i 170369 E ®. I 70® 4 ® ` �I [ - ® 170368I-3 ,'��LI n° 703551 I71`/_ 70407 I 70415] .. • 1 70354 N `. �� ''' 70M2 7036350f 703561 �703571 70 70370 'Y` o 170413 t . 70411 3671 I `O 1703001X703411 703591 70353 266 1� , IFI� `� 1704091 • _ 7r— 70366 v 70485 Z 1709121. _'�1 `� 1� ®. 70161 * Mil703111 /70309 w� :j 70905 / 70437'` �, ■I■ •' 170344 C0349 ® •` T'/� ti 7,09041 , ' 6 70310 - 70307 70466 xj7o4m1 / / �'�/ • X� Vo34s �703461io34s1- X 1 16.---- /� /JC1 H J703881 I .' �.�- - 170306 0312 11 1O+0IP' 709 N E ,® �\ 703031 _�y7 �'' PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN 281 ;L ti 'L 2564 SW Main Street - --,-(2: 7- ��- `�.. \`..._-,,I �f� \, )� '��<�y r 7 .Y/-'1c •�_ /- .�` � Tigard.OR 97223 i - -_ _J �' � v-1 -� „� 503-941-9484 `_ ,,' ,/1�C , / )� ,), 4 `� -,c scale [n I 11 x 17 a m' r.- �{ )- —_ C i--\p --7 1,1-40 PROJECT NO.: 144-001 E � 44 TYPE: PLANNING 5 G REVIEWED BY: PRE 1, _SCAmoms LE 1 7 . 4 , I 20 _ O 10 20 im 1 INCH=20 FEET n. EXISTING STAND INVENTORY EXISTING TREE INVENTORY Dominant Tree Spedes Avg DOH 1 Avg Cond 1 Overall Stand Total Total Canopy No. Stand Common Name Species Name tele C-RRd'Ofs'HT'Cad' Pies" Comments Treatment Stand Tree Species Common of and AvgD8H2 Avg Cond 2 Preservation Canopy Preserved 70826; N/A ;red alder !AMusrubro 12, 15; 0 N 1) 1 Dead top 'Remove R Riverside Homes No. Tree Species Common of led Avg ORH 3 Avg Cond 3 Rating (sq ft) (sq ft) Comments 70858; N/A (bigleaf maple Aver mocrophyllum 6,7, 121 0 N` 2 2Codoeninant stems 'Remove Dense even-aged stand of 538 Douglas-firs in an unmanaged Invasive species,codominant plantation,no understory;as well as one bigleaf maple and 70930; N/A ;sweet cherry :Prunus ovium _ 7,8 10, 0 N 2 2 stems ;Remove I Douglas-fir(Pseudorsuga mertziesd) 13 2 1 124,625 0 four invasive sweet cherries from natural regeneration along }Crown asymmetry,few dead and southern property boundary. 70931 N/A Douglas-fir Pseudotsugo menziese 21 20' 0 N ! 2 2 broken brandies 'Remove Relativelynaturai stand along south and west boundaries of 70932 N/A Douglas-fir iPseudotsugo menziesii 12' 10' 0 N 1 2 2 ;!Remove [T]503-941-9484 [F]503-941-9485 Douglas-fir(Pseudotsugo menziesd) 24 2 project site;includes 153 mature Douglas-fir,48 bigleaf maples 70933 N/A ;bigleaf maple .Ater tnocrophyAam 14 15; 0 N 2' 2 Moderate structure ;Remove below the dominant fir canopy,eight scattered invasive sweet 70936! N/A :bigleaf maple Acer mocrophyllum 11'� 121 0 N 2 2 -Remove DATE: 3/15/2021 cherries,one grand fir,one Scouler's willow,and one ( I 1 in dense row with smailertrees, if REVISIONS 2 bigleaf maple(Ater macrophyWm) 12 1 2 68,010 0 unidentified deciduous tree that may be a shrub species.Of [ !j ( poor structure,vines throughout ; the 212 trees in stand 2,66 are located off-site to the south or 71070 N/A ;Port-Orford-cedar lChomeecyporis lovesoniona 9; 6' 0 N 1 1 crowns [Remove i + along the southern property boundary and all but one will be 71071' N/A ;Port-Orford-cedar 7,8I 6 0 N 1 1 Remove NO. DATE DESCRIPTION sweet cherry(Prunus ovium) 10 1 removed with adjacent clearing.Off-site tree If71690 will be ! ! Branch Melia,*crown and basal protected at the 26-foot radius dripline at a minimum. 71077' N/A ;English walnut Jsagons regie 21! 26 0 N 1 1 decay Remove Declining stand of 41 Douglas-firs,20 of which received 71093. N/A ;deciduous (unknown 161 18 O N 1 1 Remove preservation ratings of less than 2.Root disease is suspected; 71094. N/A isweetgum IfJquidowbor styruvy'kao 24; 22 0 N 2I 2 Moderate structure Remove 3 Douglas-fir(Pseudotsugo menziesd) 16 1 1 14,680 0 site may be too wet for firs in this area.Stand 3 also includes i. Very poor structure,trunk and one Oregon ash(F axinus lotifo6o)located off-site to the south 71095. N/A 1dedduous unknown 211 19 0 N 1; 1 down decry Remove that is planned for removal with the adjacent clearing. I 1 !! { Orchard trees,not well-maintained;poor structure,trunk and 71500 N/A ;bigleaf maple 'Ater mocrophygum 12V 12 0 N 2- 2 Moderate structure,forked leaders;Remove a apple(Moles spp.) 11 1 1 11,477 0 I crown decay.Includes 13 trees. I Nistory of brand)failure,trunk I Deaf is tree diameter measured at 4.5.feet above the ground level,in inches. 71582 N/A (Douglas-fir Pseudotsugamenziese 24 20 0 N 2] 2wound 'Remove Cad is the numerical condition rating(0-3)as defined In the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: 71583:. N/A ',sweetcheny Prunus avian; 9 13 0 N 2 2 Invasive species,forked leaders Remove CANOPY FAILURE 71584; N/A ;Douglas-fir [Pseudorsuga mennesd 2B 22 0 N 3 2 Some history of branch failure Remove RATING VIGOR DENSITY DEADWOOD HISTORY PESTS DECAY , I fbstory of brands failure,numerous; o dead to severe decline <99% major scaffold branches visaxold Infested major conks and cavities 1 ) 1 declining 3060% [w8and branch die back scaffold bench infested one toefew yanks small aNties 716181 N/A ;Douglas-fir Pseudotsugo menziesd 18, 14' 0 N 21 2 Reduced sprouts {;Remove 716191 N/A ;Douglas-fir 4'seudotsuga menzksii M 17 0 N 2 2Reduced vigor ;Remove 2 average 60-90% small twigs small branches Minor present only at pruning wounds 3 tend to excellent 90100% lime or none none zone absent to present only atpmmngwounds 7300031 N/A 'Douglas-fir 'IPseudotsuga mennesii 15 16 0 N 1 1 Broken top,small live crown !Remove 73000311 N/A apple IMolus sup. 11 12 0 N 1 1 Very poor structure {Remove Pros is the numerical suitability for ptmervation rating 10-31 as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: Invasive species,dead and broken RATING CONSIDERATIONS 730004' N/A European white birch ifletula pendula 13, 101 0 N, 1 1 branches,crown decay Remove 0 Nuisance trees are the dominant species in the stand and/or continued viability of the stand is unlikely due to pests,competition from nuisance tree or plant species,hydrologic changes or 'pal is tree diameter measured at 4.5-feel above the ground level In lnche;trees with multiple trunks splitting below DOH are measured separately and Individual trunk other factors. 1 The stand requires currently cos t pmhibiti ve level of investment end management of pests,diseases,nuisance tree or plant species.hydrology or other factors a become stable. measurements theaarate crown byucsmee Infeeept ultiple trunks of thesame girt are indicated asgWriugxsire. D-fly is the average crown radius measured feet. RIVERSIDE The standyd is viable but requires more frequent management and monitoring of pests, nuisance tree or plant suedes, a logy or other for continued nobility a stand '0/5 Identifies them Grown.1 as either Open Grown or Stand Gro . 2 /''tom C' toted as a'3'. 'HT identifies whether or not the tree Is a Heritage Tree(dttlerl for yes or N for no). AT SCHOLLS 3 The stand is viable but requires less frequent management and monitoring of pests,diseases,nuisance tree or plant species,hydrology a other factors for continued viability than a stand 'fend is the numerical condition rating(o-3)as defined In the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: mated as a"2'. Tad Canopy is thedellneated on-site tree venom area lin square feet)calculated by Pacific Community Design. RATING VIGOR CANOPY DENSITY DEADWOOD FAILURE HISTORY PESTS DECAY MEADOW o dead to severe decline a30% Or scaffold branch >3 scaffold Infested major conks and cavities 1 declining 30-60% Land branch diebi snafmold branches Infested one to a few webs;small cantles PLANNED 2 average 60-90A small twigs small branches Mina Present only at pruning wounds 3 good to excellent 90.100% little or none none Hone absent to presentonte at Pinning wounds DEVELOPMENT 'Pees is the nunr ricaI suitability for preservation rating(0-3)as defined In the ilgard Urban Forestry manual: RATING CONSIDERATIONS o The tree Is a"haunt tree)as defined In mapter le12o of the Tigard Development Code and'hazardtree abatement)as defined In Chaeter 18.1201n the Tigard Development Code cannot be completed In a manner that results in tree retention consistent with tree are Industry standards. 1 The tree is dead,In severe dedine,or declining but may still be retained If desirable for wildlife orotbet benefits because it is not considered a"ha rand tree" r'hazard as a abatement'could r structural stability RECEIVED The tree has average health and/or strucaal slabiliry that could be alleviated with IrcatmenU the tree will be less resilient to development Impacts and will require more frequent management and monitoring after development than a tree rated as a'3". 3 The tree has good to extellent health and structural stability,the tree will be more resilient to development Impacts,and will require lass frequent management and monitoring after development ha n a tree rated as a'2". SEP 2 9 Z0Z1 CITY OF TIGARI TREE INVENTORY E 3 b E a 111 0li "- PACIfIC COMMUNfT'Y DESIGN g 12564 SW Main Street Tigard.OR 97223 [T]503-941-9484 S PROJECT NO.: 144-001 TYPE: PLANNING • E REVIEWED BY: PRE D g 17 . 5 g