01/08/1992 - Minutes r"
HPO B3 MINUTES
January 8, 1992
1 . Meeting called to order at 7 :05 P.M. at Tigard Senior Center.
2 . Present: Froude, Garner, Hansen, Helm, Mortensen
Excused: Porter
Pending member: Dana LeMoine
visitors: Nick & Lynette Garrett, Carl Froude
3 . approved minutes of December 4 , 1991 meeting.
4 . City Planner, Jerry offer, came to give information regarding
the proposal to establish a new Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
designation, entitled, "Co=unity Commercial" .
a. Specifications are sites limited to between 2 & 8 acres,
must be separated from other commercial districts by a minimum of
1/2 mile and be located on arterial or major collector streets. The
size of the buildings are limited.
b. A map of Tigard with 13 potential sites was presented.
Jerry said the purpose of designation of sites is only to show the
limited places that the Community Commercial zone can currently
apply to. Several are not economically feasible and others would
be denied due to another one within 1/2 mile being built.
c. The current schedule is to make co=ents at our February
XPO 3 meeting. The Planning Commission have request on their early
March meeting schedule, then a public hearing will be scheduled.
d. At Bev Froude's suggestion, we will set up a meeting in
late January with NPO 7 and CPO 4 to discuss this very important
issue.
5. David Bantz of oTAK Engineering presented informational plans
for a new subdivision planned for Bull Mountain.
a. It is located on 16 acres of the Robinson property on the
south side of Bull Mountain Rd. at approximately 120 Ave.
b. A request for a zone change to R-4 .5 will be made to allow
49 new houses and leave Mrs. Robinson's present house. This makes
the density 2 .9 lots per acre.
c. The smallest lot will be 9600 sq. ft. , Mrs. Robinson's lot
the largest at 67 ,000 sq. ft. , making the density 73.8% Of the
allowable for R-4.5.
d. Aspen Properties, Larry Rosenkrantz, has the option on the
prop-arty.
e. New neighbors, Hick and Lynette Garrett, expressed concern
about the development and many questions and concerns were
presented.
6. An annexation request by George and Jamie Wise for the purpose
of connecting to the sewer.
a. It was moved and seconded that this request be accepted.
Passed unanimously.
b. Concern was expressed that if the back of the wine property
is developed in the future, NPO 3 requests that the street be
widened.
i�
7. An annexation request by Barry and Mona Edwards for the purpose
of connecting to the sewer.
a. It was moved and seconded that this request be accepted.
Passed unanimously.
s. A request for a minor partition by Dean Schumacher for the
purpose of placing an existing duplex on a lot currently zoned for
single family.
a. NPO 3 is not opposed to the minor partition and moving of
the duplex.
b. NPO 3 does not understand the reason for requesting a
variance to delete the sidewalk requirement and vacation of the
public right of way.
c. We request that we be presented with more information
regarding item b. for our February meeting.
9. Other busineass A letter to Liz Newton from Nancy Smith
submitting her resignation from NPO 3 was distributed. All of the
members of NPO 3 express regret at -losing Nancy's valuable
contributions and hope that she will be able to rejoin at a future
time.
10.Meeting adjourned at 9too P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Lila Garner