02/11/1975 - Packet ' .
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 5641 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST.
V TIGARD, OREGON 97223
PHONE (503) 639-1554
February 11, 1975
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER
1. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF LAST MEETING
2. VISITORS
3. RESOLUTION TO PAY VOUCHERS
4. RESOLUTION TO APPOINT BUDGET OFFICER AND MEMBERS OF
THE BUDGET COMMITTEE
5. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH COOPERS & LYBRAND
OR OTHERS TO PERFORM ANNUAL AUDIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1974-
1975
6. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND PRESENT TO BOARD OF DTRF.CTORS,
TUALATIN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, A PROPOSAL TO
EXPAND THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE EITHER INTO THE COMMUNITY
HALL OR UPSTAIRS
7. RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE FUTURE REBATES FOR MAIN EXTENSIONS
TO INCLUDE AN INTEREST RATE OF 5% COMPOUNDED ANNUALLY
8. RESOLUTION TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 15, 1975
TO CONSIDER A USER RATE INCREASE OF AT LEAST 12%, EFFECTIVE
APRIL 21, 1975
9. OTHER BUSINESS
*air
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
1. Resolution to approve minutes of last meeting, as written.
2. Visitors.
Three property owners have indicated they will appear before the
Board to request relief on their water bill, two for undetected leaks,
and one because his water bill is $1.60 higher due to installation of
a new, replacement meter for an old meter 20 years of age. Their names
are as follows:
Edwin S. Radford, 12300 S. W. James St.
Reginald Justus, 14270 S. W. 100th Avenue
Steve Shoeheights, 12665 S. W. Karen Street
In the case of Mr. Shoeheights it appears that he did not take
vow immediate action upon being advised by the district that he had a
leak on his side of the meter.
3. Resolution to pay vouchers.
4. Resolution to appoint Budget Officer and members of the Budget
Committee.
It would seem appropriate to appoint either the Administrator or
a Commissioner as the Budget Officer for the new budget to commence on
July 1, 1975.
Actually, it is not necessary to appoint any new members of the
Budget Committee as all five are hold-overs from prior years. However,
a few alternates could be selected. Present members are:
Term Expires:
H. Dale Johnson, 12245 S. W. Marion St. 1977
Neil Longfellow, 14810 S. W. 141st Ave. 1976
George Marshall, 14970 S. W. Hawk Ridge Rd. 1977
Michael D. O'Neil, 13585 S. W. Fern St. 1977
William M. Stebbins, 13273 S. W. Bull Mt. Rd. 1977
Akar
—1—
N=w
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
5. Resolution to approve contract with Coopers & Lybrand or others
to perform annual audit for fiscal year 1974-75.
Coopers & Lybrand will have a contract prepared for the basic
fee of $3,000 plus a cost of living increase. A local CPA firm,
Anderson, Asson, & Hess, was also contacted and requested to submit
a bid for these services.
Enclosed is the audit report for fiscal year 1974-75 prepared
by Coopers & Lybrand. I Will be prepared to explain any deficiencies
in the district's accounting system.
6. Resolution to approve and present to Board of Directors, Tualatin
Rural Fire Protection District, a proposal to expand the administrative
office either into the Community Hall or upstairs.
The two proposals for expanding the administrative office at the
fire station have been investigated. Enclosed are drawings and/or
sketches of the two options.
Pertinent information on each proposal is as follows:
Part of Community Hall Upstairs
Square footage: 14' x 14' = 196 sq. ft. 14' x 40' = 560 sq. ft.
Estimated cost $ 4,000 $ 15,000
The advantages of expanding into the Community Hall are the
desirability of additional space, all on the same ground level, and
the lower cost factor. Disadvantages are that it does not meet the
needs of the district beyond 3 or 4 years, deprives the public of a
large portion of the Community Hall, and makes impractical the continued
meeting place for many public functions, such as municipal court, social
receptions, hobby classes, etc.
Advantages of the upstairs concept include utilization of space not
now being used, provides for ample office space for the 10 to 15 year
period, enhances the architectural design of the present building, and
the overhanging eaves provide protection from the weather.
-2-
'fir
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
One must review the water district's responsibilities and
obligations, both legal and moral, in infringing upon the public's
right to retain the Community Hall in its present capacity. The
Community Hall was built by volunteers who gave their time and effort
to construct a meeting place for the public's use. In contracts
between TRFPD and TWD reference was made inferring that the Community
Hall should remain in tact, as noted in the quoted extracts below:
a. Transfer of title of building and land from TWD to
TRFPD dated February 1, 1965:
"Whereas the water district holds legal title to certain
lands hereinafter described in the City of Tigard, upon
which is located a building presently housing the office
of the water district, the Tigard substation of the fire
district, and with space assigned for use as the Tigard
Community Center, construction cost of said building and
facilities having been financed in part by donations from
io,,, interested persons and organizations throughout the area,
and the water district having expended approximately $6,800
of public funds with respect to the land and building:
Now, therefore, in consideration of the foregoing premises
and the promises and agreements herein contained, the water
district agrees to convey the legal title to the hereinafter
described lands, together with the facilities thereon, to the
fire district, promptly upon execution of this agreement by
the parties, and the fire district agrees to accept the same,
subject to the following terms and conditions to which the
parties bind themselves:
(3) That portion of the building heretofore and now in use
as a Community Center shall at all times hereafter continue
to be available for such community purposes, including the
kitchen, rest room and other facilities thereof. The fire
district shall be responsible for supervision of the Community
Center space and facilites, scheduling of authorized uses of
the Community Center, and all matters relating thereto,
including the fixing of reasonable charges for custodial
services, prorating costs, and maintenance and operation,
under such reasonable regulations as the fire district shall
deem necessary."
-3-
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
b. Lease agreement between TWD and TRFPD dated September 14,
1965:
"That in consideration of the convenants, agreements and
stipulations herein contained on the part of said water
district to be paid, kept and faithfully performed by said
water district, the fire district does hereby lease, demise
and let unto the water district those certain premises
presently utilized for the water district office as now
partitioned in the Tigard fire hall and Community building
located on the following described real property, "
In the end it will be the TRFPD who will decide which course of
action is acceptable. The most you can do is recommend one or the
other which would be in the best interests of the water district.
You may be interested to know that Wolf Creek Highway Water
which is 4 times as large as TWD has approved the expenditure of
$400,000 for a new office-shop complex. The site, containing 8 acres
of land, was purchased for $20,000 per acre or $160,000. I do not
believe we could justify spending anywhere near that amount nor do
I recommend it.
7. Resolution to authorize future rebates for main extensions to
include an interest rate of 5$ compounded annually.
There exists an inequity in the present rebate agreements. The
person(s) who initially pays to install a main across property other
than his own is always the loser. First, he loses his investment if
others do not connect to the main within a 10 year period. Secondly,
those who do connect, pay on a front foot basis computed at the date
of installation. In effect, the ones who connect at a later date are
utilizing the initial investor's funds interest free.
This inequity should be corrected along with the fact that there
should be some incentive to encourage "others" to participate in the
original investment.
The following O.R.S. on rebates is quoted as follows:
-4-
4r+'
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
O.R.S. 264.372. Methods of assessment;
alternative financing. The district board
in adopting a method of assessment of the
costs of the improvement may:
(1) Use any just and reasonable method
of determining the extent of any improvement
district consistent with the benefits derived.
(2) Use any method of apportioning the
sum to be assessed as is just and reasonable
between the properties determined to be spe-
cially benefited.
(3) Authorize payment by the district
of all, or any part, of the cost of any such
improvement, when in the opinion of the board
Now, the topographical or physical conditions, or
unusual or excessive public travel, or other
character of the work involved warrants only
a partial payment or no payment by the bene-
fited property of the costs of the improvement.
It would appear fair and reasonable to charge subsequent
property owners who connect to an existing main interest at 5%
compounded annually to be rebated to those who made the initial
investment.
The above quoted paragraph of the O.R.S. is not intended to
be all inclusive and the final authority in assessing an interest
charge in this manner. Ken Baines has indicated that "this ground
has been plowed before" and his immediate reaction is that he
believes such a charge may be illegal. At most, he believes a
district could charge on a basis of simple, not compound, interest.
There are other legal definitions such as the term "cost" which
only an attorney can define properly. Ken Baines will research
the subject prior to the meeting.
-5-
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
8. Resolution to hold a public hearing on April 15, 1975 to
consider a user rate increase of at least 12, effective April
21, 1975.
It appears inevitable that water rates, at some time, have to
be increased. Unfortunately, it must be sooner than anticipated.
The last consumer rate increase was 3 years ago, and without going
into detail, everyone is well aware of economic conditions since
then.
In attempts to avoid an increase in rates we have taken action
in every conceivable area, including postponement of some capital
improvements, gaining additional revenue by volume sales, increasing
meter installation charges, reducing water losses due to leaks,
increased efficiency of personnel and equipment, etc. We have reached
the end of the line and an increase in water rates is necessary if
we hope to have a balanced budget for the next fiscal year, starting
July 1st.
'410,e
The new budget is in the preparatory stage and the following
major items reflect the need for additional revenue:
This Next Increase
Income: Year Year or Decrease
Water Sales (10% increase) $426,000 $ 469,000 +$ 43,000
Total: + $43,000
Expenses:
Salaries (Cost-of-living
inc. )(12%) + 1 draftsman $152,000 $179,000 +$ 27,000
Water Costs, electricity 27,000 36,000 + 9,000
Water Costs, Lake Oswego 85,000 100,000 + 15,000
(without rate increase)
Major Equipment:
ton pickup truck $ 4,000
Pump station 36,000
Telemetry 5,000 19,000 45,000 + 26,000
Land & Improvements 22,000 19,000 - 3,000
411100. Pipe replacements & Ext. 75,000 95,000 + 20,000
Total: + $94,000
Major Items: Deficit: - $51,000
-6-
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
This deficit figure does not include the increased costs of
many other items such as Blue Cross, social security, SAIF, insurance,
office supplies, equipment, material, meters, etc.
Of major significance is the fact that the anticipated deficit
does not include a proposed wholesale water rate increase by the City
of Lake Oswego which, at this time, is unknown. Following this
paragraph is a summary of the amount of water consumed, both well
and Clackamas River, as well as the cost for calendar year 1974.
You will notice that 291 of the total water comsumed was imported
from the Clackamas River. The least amount was imported in January
(45%) while the most was 74% in September.
For many years the customers of the TWD have enjoyed the lowest
water rates in Washington County, and possibly the lowest in the
Portland metropolitan area, exclusive of the City of Portland.
Those who object to the quality (hardness) of well water should take
special heed as these lower rates are due, primarily, to the low
production costs of well water. Last year, all water purveyors
utilizing Bull Run water increased their rates, some by as much as
50%. The following table reflects the water rates for cities and
water districts in this area:
Average Cost
Cost per 100 Cu. per month
City or Water District Minimum per Month Ft. thereafter (1200 cu. ft.)
Tigard 600 cu. ft. _ $3.00 40¢ $5.40
Palatine Hill 400 cu. ft. _ $6.75 40¢ $9.95
Beaverton 0 cu. ft. _ $1.00 500 $7.00
Wolf Creek Highway 300 cu. ft. _ $2.75 500 $7.25
Metzger 250 cu. ft. _ $2.00 55f $7.23
West Slope 500 cu. ft. _ $3.50 70¢ $8.40
Capitol Highway 200 cu. ft. _ $2.30 800 $10.30
Tualatin 300 cu. ft. _ $3.50 80¢ $10.70
It is suggested that as a minimum the TWD's rates be increased
12% as shown below which would generate about $56,000 annually:
Minimum per Month Cost per 100 Cu. Average Cost
Ft. thereafter per month
(1200 cu. ft.)
500 cu. ft. . $3.00 45¢ $6.15
-7-
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
Please note that the $3 monthly minimum would remain the same,
but less water would be authorized for that same minimum cost.
I have not fully studied the detailed needs of the district
and resultant effects of such a rate increase. Consequently, at
this time, it is recommended that you resolve to consider a user
rate increase at the next regular meeting, March 11th, which will
allow me the necessary time to fully examine and analyse, in detail,
the effects and ramifications.
Water rate hearing. O.R.S. 264.312 is quoted as follows:
(1) Whenever any increase is proposed in the existing rates
charged water consumers by a district pursuant to ORS 264.310, the
board of commissioners shall first provide for a public hearing on
such proposal before any increased rates are ordered into effect.
(2) The public hearing required under subsection (1) of this
section shall be held at a place designated by the board after
notice thereof has been given by inclusion of a notice of the
public hearing in the water bills sent to consumers by the district
during the period of 30 days prior to the date of the hearing.
If you should decide to increase the rates at the March 11th
meeting, a notice of public hearing can be sent to the customers
during the regular billing period, commencing March 17th. The
public hearing can be scheduled for the regular meeting on April
15th. Although the increase canbe effective as of April 21st, it
will be the last week of June (2 months later) before any additional
revenue will be realized. (In time for the new fiscal year, July 1st).
-8-
yew
AMOUNT OF WATER PUMPED AND PURCHASED
CALENDAR YEAR 1974
Lake Oswego
Water Water Total Percentage Cost
Month Pumped Purchased Water Lake Oswego Lake Oswego
Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft.
Jan 3,021,250 2,471,900 5,493,150 45% $ 3,461
Feb 2,737,480 3,907,200 6,644,680 59% 5,470
Mar 2,884,620 2,631,700 5,516,320 48% 3,684
Apr 2,794,280 3,007,200 5,801,480 52% 4,210
May 3,861,800 3,501,200 7,363,000 48% 4,902
Jun 3,734,470 4,000,200 7,734,670 52% 5,600
Jul 3,763,490 7,053,600 10,817,090 65% 9,875
Aug 3,622,210 9,328,500 12,950,710 72% 13,060
Sep 3,228,380 9,061,600 12,289,980 74% 12,686
Oct 3,667,170 6,065,700 9,?32,870 62% 8,492
Nov 3,386,100 3,672,800 7,058,900 52% 5,142
Dec 3,548,600 2,994,700 6,543,300 48% 4,193
40,249,850 57,696,300 97,946,150 59% $ 80,775
9. Other business.
10. Water pumped from wells. calendar year 1975.
Month Actual *Actual Allocation/month Actually pumped
1975 Cubic Feet Acre-feet Acre-feet in past years:
Acre-feet
Jan 3,565,520 81.9 88 1970: 1,616
1971: 1,418
* 1 acre-foot in 43,560 cubic feet 1972: 1,501
1973: 1,269
1974: 924
-9-
`w
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
13. Eastern Washington County Water Purveyors Council (EWCWPC)
A meeting was held on January 21, 1975 of the EWCWPC to discuss
water rights on the Willamette River. It was a very informative
meeting.
Mr. Trevor Jones from the office of the Oregon State Engineer
presented information about obtaining water for domestic consumption
from the Willamette River at Wilsonville. A summary of his comments
are presented below.
"PGE has prior water rights on the Willamette River for 29,000
cubic feet per second (cfa) or 19,300 million gallons per day (MGD)
at Oregon City for water to provide power (hp or kw).
The Corps of Engineers releases water at the dam sites without
approval of the State Engineer, except they must attempt to maintain
a minimum of 360,000 cfs or 240,000 MGD.
Wolf Creek Highway Water District filed for water rights on the
Willamette at Wilsonville for 150 MGD in June 1973. 150 MGD would
accomodate all of eastern Washington County to well beyond year 2000.
No action will be taken on this application until such time as Wolf
Creek or other water purveyors are serious about procuring water. The
date of the application is paramount and future rights for any water
are based upon this filing date. Apparently there is no time limit
on the actual receipt of water. Before the State Engineer will process
the application he will need the following:
a. Boundary of proposed area to be served.
b. Forecast or study of how much water will be needed.
A domestic water purveyor could attempt to obtain either the "free"
flow water or the water stored behind the dams. Of course, stored water
will cost significantly more.
It may be 30 years to adjudicate all of the water rights on the
Alogi
Willamette River so one should not be too concerned about all the
unknown rights on the Willamette River. "
Finally, it was the opinion of Mr. Jones that water ought to be
available at Wilsonville for the needs of eastern Washington County.
-11-
Aloe
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
14. Work accomplished during January 1975:
a, TWD installed 750 feet of 12" D.I. and 100 feet of 8" C.I.
plus 3 fire hydrants along S. W. Landmark Lane, near S. W. 72nd
Avenue, north of Bonita Road, for Sabre Construction Company.
(Developers).
b. TWD installed 860 feet of 8" C.I. + 1 fire hydrant along
S. W. 113th Avenue, south of Durham Road, for Mr. Phildius, et al.
(Developers).
c. TWD installed 188 feet of 6" C.I. along Hall Blvd. near
Scoffins to complete a circulation loop and replace 6" 0.D. steel
pipe. (Pipe replacement).
d. TWD installed 4" fire hydrants at following locations:
1` Monterey Lane and King Richard (N. E. corner)
4110` (2) 132nd and Bull Mt. Road (North of Knauss' house)
e. TWD installed 8 meters (4317 - 4310). District also serves
116 meters in Metzger Water District. Total: 4433.
15. Work to be accomplished during remainder of fiscal year 1974-75.
February 1975:
a. TWD install 1510 feet of 8" C.I. + 4 fire hydrants along
Commercial Street, between Hall and Main, to replace 6" O.D. steel
pipe. (Pipe replacement).
b. TWD install 780' of 12" D.I. + 2 fire hydrants along Hall
Blvd., Commercial to Scoffins, to replace 6" O.D. Steel pipe.
(Pipe replacement).
-12-
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued)
March 1975:
a. TWD install 1200 feet of 8" C.I. and 720 feet of 6" C.I.
+ 1 fire hydrant along S. W. 96th Avenue, Murdock to Sattler Road
to replace 4" O.D. steel pipe. (pipe replacement).
b. (Tentative). TWD install 540 feet of 6" C.I. + 1 fire
hydrant along S. W. 74th Avenue, between Fir and Cherry Streets,
for private property owners. (Developers and pipe extension).
April 1975:
a. TWD install 640 feet of 6" C.I. + 2 fire hydrants along
S. W. 117th Avenue, south of Gaarde Street to replace 4" 0.D.
steel pipe. (Pipe replacement).
b. TWD install 550 feet of 8" C.I. along Pacific Highway,
__ between Johnson and MacKenzie Streets. (Pipe extension).
c. (Tentative). TWD install 850 of 12" D.I. + 1 fire hydrant
along 98th Avenue, from Summerfield Drive to Durham Road, for Tigard
Church of God. (Developers).
May 1975:
a. TWD install, along with Cornell Manufacturing Company, a
pump station, with 3-25 hp pumps at new Hi Tor reservoir site to
provide adequate pressure in area. (General Fund).
b. TWD install 200 feet of 6" C.I. and 200 feet of plastic
pipe (6") in 36" steel casing under two sets of railroad tracks on
Bonita Road, between 74th and General Chain Bar Company. (Pipe
extension).
June 1975:
a. TWD install 4" fire hydrants at following locations:
1) James Street at Howard Drive (S. W. corner)
2) 119th and North Dakota (N.E. corner)(6" fire hydrant)
3) Burlerest, between Burlheights & Summercrest (cul de sac)
some 4 121st and Summer (S. W. corner)
5 121st and Katherine (S. E. corner)
6 116th and Lynn (S. W. corner)
7) Lynn, between 118th & 119th (So. side between TL 135 & 136)
(8) Ash Drive and Frewing Court (S. W. corner)
(9) Hill View and 103rd (S. E. corner of cul de sac)
(10) 88th and Pinebrook (N. E. corner)
-11-
' E
PIPE REPI,ACEMENTS FY 1075-76
1 . Fern Street, 135th to the west.
(replace 4" 0.D. and extend gravity system)
1100' of 12" D.1. O $12/f t St 13,200
,00' of 6" C.T. n $6/ft 2,1,00
$ 1 5,600
`.'. '3 reservoir. on 135th Avenue to Fern Si,.
(parallel 8" C.I. for pressurized system)
550' of 12" D.I. $12/ft 6,600
3. Pacific Highway (eastside), Garrett to Main St.
(replace 6" 0.D.)
2300' of 12" D.I. ft $12/ft 27,600
4. Hall Blvd. , Burnham to Commercial Street
(replace 6" O.D. )
800' of 12" D.I. @ $12/ft $ 9,600
Railroad crossing 2,000
__._ —. 11,6>>0
5. Watkins, Derry Dell to Walnut Street
(replace 4" 0.D. )
1500' of 8" C.I. M 88/ft 12,000
6. James, west of 121st Avenue
(replace 4" O.D.)
600' of 6" C.I. @ $6/ft $ 3,600
Marion, west of 121st Avenue
(replace 4" 0.D.)
1900' of 8" C.I. $8/ft 15,200
•
Alberta Street to James St.
(circulation loop to James)
400' of 6" C.I. ® $6/ft 2,400
21,200
Total: $ 94,600
' 4-33 784 A
ACCOUNT NO. 1 .
,ffNIN FA. RADFORD - NAME t
A..? 4 � 3 *JJAMBI"- P..V. ADDRESS
STIGARD, OLlh• 7!223 STATE
METER CU. FT. CURRENT PAST DU[ PAYMENTS Bll_ING `
READINGS CONSUMED BILLING BALANCE DATE BALANCE
323 ,
353 1) '
.,6.00 + JU! 20'77 6.00 *
6.00 AUf, 2'77 .00 • <:. .,
344 11 4, y
6.00♦ SEP 20'73 6.00• . '"5. . .1,i:
353 9
6.00 OCT 373 .00•
.
6.00+ NOV 2073 6.00• 1 :k.1
6.00 DEC ?'73 .00• '' A'
367 14 ,� V,,
,: -
6.80+ _ "_ - JAN 22'74 6.80 • " i �'
6.80 FEB 8'74 .00 •
37;; 9 '4 ‘4,,;
600 +. -
iAfl 20',4 6.00 • " ,';:..r,,,,,1
6.00 Aria 6.',4 .00 • '. '. 4
}.01� .47-
4 ,mAY 21'74 6.010 s , r.;
6.00 JUN _.'r4 .00 • n--..-ii*
i. :
8 . -"'
6.00♦ .ASL 2374 6.00• t `'
437 14 6.00 AUG 8'74 .00• p s
6.80+ SEP 20'74 6.80• �
6.80 OCT 1'74 .00• *-. .,'..,„*,;'.-0.1.,�
41._ 5
6.00+ NOV 19'74 6.00 • j'4.14,At,
..
610 C 10'74 .00• 444; t'....420 8 ' . Ail.
rih 8 .....4,.. .
7.60+, , JOM 21'75 7.60 • 1 .)- .
` s'.rkr
TIGARD WA-ER DISTRICT .
'TIGARD OREGON
.
1 - I 15 2650 ,
ACCOUNT NO. A N,
iNALD J, :STUS NAMF t
1146'flia..) SW 1.' )()th ADDRESS / 1'0
TriAGII:iD, Olt.:. 97E23 STATF
'111*Me METER CU. FT. CURRENT PAST DUI . •
BILLING . •
READINGS CONSUMED PILLING II"LANCE PAYMENTS DATE BALANCE
77 t
,1 •
13.70 +611-- Ill,
1'3.7^ AUG
777 209.7044" SEP 25'73 9.70*
796 19 . 9.70 OCT 15'73 .00• ...
, .
9.30 NOV 27'73 9.30 •
9.30 DEC 7'73 .00 •
313 17
850 4 i'---- JAN 23'74 8.50 •
20
8.90 FEB 14'74 .00 '
970 . . .,
) 7 ) /0 A )'/4
, 1,,,,,,i
, ry) li ,„r1
884 29 1 .
1330+ JUL 26'74 13.30 •
e A, , . -•
13.30 AUG 16'74 .00.
92,5 21
10.10 + SEP 25'74 t0.10 • ':'v-110.',.. • .--. ...-"
10.10 OCT 10'74 .0(- •
%.0 . o-7• r),-
-,-) ;',4 fa. IN li • ,
-, : ',._.-...;wri •.,•, '
''' '2.10 4 N(1%,i 2' '7t 1 2,1.3 •
tY 977 46 12.10 D(610'74 .00• ilf!' , .-P- ...- •
„. . Y. ,,-,44-• •,.t.. '
20.10+SicJAN 24'75 20.10 • . 't':.'-• " "
; , • r -,,,,.'r. ,,,,F 'W
. .
• •
•
. . ,
• .
•
13 :;aate TICARD WATER DISTRICT .
TIGARD, OREGON
. ,
., .
. 7
. ' .
. .
. .
. ,
! , .
• . . ., .
, .
. .
•% , ' ' , , .
. ,
. .
. , ,I• ' .,
• • 2— .2C-)A1 79� / ^ ACCOUNT NO. H
N A ;.V 6 i J-, A J`t1 1 1 rfi"— ` t:z-d'd=
ADD SSv
ADDRESS
s} ,4b-: SW i'�A:3EN ST
STATE
i "' T1UAr D OF 97223
7 �.1E'ER CU. FT. CJR RF!.'T PAST DUE BILLINGRE A2 NGS ;-oN•.Un,E., Bill_IN eAI.ANCE PAYMENTS DATE BALANCE
bJ,2-
1
1; ' : i?,-775 ,
I ,
136 28
12.40+ SEP 19'73 12.40
12.40 OCT 2213 .00•
143 12
6.00+ NOV 19173 6.00 •
6.00 . IN 18'74 .00 •
1::75 17,,
3.40 + , aN 21'74 8.40 • ., �w, . : .vA
3.4 ' ,. ")7174 .0'
I 1`,'111 1/ i b �• ¢d
. (11 1, 4 '''t,,,4).,,4,,I
17:ti: P.T,,1,,
r 4 Ca
K'
•
TI ;ARD N ATER DISTRICT
TIG RD, OREGON
Cil
--r6-3.. 3549 1-1
��+� �t /,��( ‘? A
ACCOUNT NO.
N1 Zit'V ' ►6I. .. . `�r. dizzi cZ(/ t.e.SAAME -yam, t.
AdLia 4it5 SW KAREN ST ADDRESS
,••-7,7,,,,
X/ 7"—'"'
"TIGARD OR 9799 STATE
*41111e l'iL
METER C . FT. CURRENT PAST TUE BILLING
READINGS CONSUMED RILL.IN.. RAIAN(F PAYMENTS DATE BALANCE
rr f
rin(
[
6.00 JUN 27'74 .00 •
213 27
12.00+ JUL 22'74 12.00 •
24A 31.
',0)1\t-
13.60 + 12.00 + SEP 19'74 25.60 • -c >-
')5.4') OCT 19'74 .00 • ,e '
1,-,:.1'; + :4[0: 1 -'/A 4' ' "' • "v :.
�
j a I '513 155 46.80 DEC 17'74 .00 • • i:,.... ,
63.20 +.--"--- JAN 20'75 63.20 * '.
.'. - tat
___ _______ _ ek: c_///?//'2/
nurruughs TIGARD WATER DISTRICT .
1101.11,Foe 0 F
.
/N OREGON
e
•
COOPERS & LYBRAND
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
IN PRINCIPAL AREAS 2700 FIRST NATIONAL BANK TOWER
OF THE WORLD PORTLAND, OREGON 97201
RE51OEN1 !'n1V1 NERS (N(]C}227-8600
wEesrR c. 11ARRINGTON
ROY H WEBSTER
CltfFORD T STEWART
HAROLD
February 5, 1975
HAROLD O BREVIG �1
YRON! FLECK
RIC1lARIT K POWERS
JAMES I SAVAGE
JOHN R MCCLURE
Board of Commissioners
Tigard Water District
8841 S. W. Commercial Street
Tigard, Oregon
Gentlemen:
At the request of your administrator , MI . Robert Santee,
I have enclosed the audit contract for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 1975 .
You will note the fee, $3, 000, is the same amount as
the fee for the 1974 audit. We appreciate your consideration
relative to this matter in our 1974 contract. Furthermore, we
will attempt to utilize your office staff more in preparation of
schedules, etc. for use in the audit. This has two beuefic=.a1
aspects: (1) it helps develDp your personnel and (2) it helps
mitigate the cost of the audit.
If the contract meets with your approval, please
execute all three copies and forward to me. I will file one
copy with the Division of Audits and return one copy for your
files. If there are any questions, please contact me at your
earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
CAPrl'm4>S—;)N
James L. Savage
JLS:dc
Enclosure:; •
CONTRACT FOR AUDIT
OF OREGON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 19 , in accordance with
the requirements of Oregon Revised Statutes 297 .610 through 297 740
between Coopers & Lybrand by James L. Savage, Partner, of Portland, Oregon,
hereinafter known as the Party of the First Part, and Tigard
Water District hereinafter known as the Party of the Second Part.
1. IT IS HEREBY AGREED that the Party of the First Part shall
conduct an audit of the accounts and fiscal affairs of the Party of the
Second Part for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1974 and ending June 30,
1975 , in accordance with the prescribed Minimum Standards of Audit Reports,
Certificates and Procedures.
2. Party of the First Part agrees that the services he has
contracted to perform under this contract shall be rendered by him or under
his personal supervision and that the work scall be faithfully performed
with care and diligence .
3 . It is understood and agreed that, should unusual conditions
arise or be encountered during the course of the audit whereby the services
of the Party of the First Part are necessary beyond the extent of the work
contemplated, written notification of such unusual conditions shall be
delivered to the Party of the Second Part who shall instruct in writing
%r' the Party of the First Part concerning such additional services .
4 . The audit shall be started as soon after this contract is
executed as _s agreeable to the Parties hereto and shall be completed and
a written report thereon rendered within a reasonable time after the close
of the audit period covered by this contract. Four or more copies of such
report shall be rendered to the Party of the Second Part and its form and
content shall be in accordance with and not less than that outlined in the
Minimum Standards of Audit Reports, Certificates and Procedures.
5 . In consideration of the faithful performance of the
conditions, covenants, and undertakings herein set forth, the Party of the
Second Part hereby agrees to pay the Party of the First Part $3 , 000
and the Party of the Second Part hereby affirms that proper provision
for the payment of such fee has been or will be duly made and that funds
for the payment thereof are or will be made legally available .
COOPERS & LYBRAND
By
James L. Savage, Partner
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
Party of the SeconPart
By
ir'
.,.
1 ,
t •
4
TRFPD, Tigard Station
r t Proposed Tigard Water District office addition ,
, Truck bays Scale: 1" 10'
\ I Rest Rooms
7,,e•---- 1 i ---',1
--- /i •
1 _
Hall
i I
! /
Existing . Y
t ' - --I--- Utility Room
TRFPD /
,r . 7' -1.-. I
office2 i___ (_______.'
44 154 ft Hall
w •
4
-•,.) , .i‘ //..„ .cn // . Existing Community Hall
/ \
.;
1526 ft2
I
co •
-1 st
0 N- Existing i,./ //,/ „ // / ,
14
' '/ // , /,:// .-/ I - Reduced Community Hall
ii;///// / /, '..
0 ( office ; l'/ //' ' ;;/;' ; ' • ' ' I 1330 ft2
c.. I 364 ft2 -`/TWD addition ,' ;4-
.
?/: '. -/ 196' ft2' ,•- I
Kitchen
1
1 : 1
I : 1 ----- 14E -";
'V
- Electrical boxes
'
• ; t T ! • • , ' s • \\\ 1\•'_', - , -:
--- ''',.........,
J4- IA --' 47' 1
- $
I
Ash Street
.. - .
m'-' ,1"---.......__'
a
yin
F
'...-,... '.‘ i
s.
,.
,.. ,
, ,,
i
t
1.
¢ q
'( sp ,
I
jJ
'fir
4:"
/ 1 i S ,I : ii ? \ s ,,:)1
\ `
11 ' 'fil i'. i--. i : : - : •,' ?...,.i,_,_1....„t_-27,444
' i
‘s\:s.s. ..\\,„ „. '.,.:-..
\\,,,c\ X'', '',--4,,17,---T ' \ \‘, \ ,-L'-'-=•i.. ',''' . il.` ,.
•
E '?7,-,771-.H':„.1.4.7,?'
4• 4 ?' ,.
�•
� ...•`Tier. \.�
u,.sd
.,, ►