Report (2) _l12,11-0 , _P-1.3g7 5(A., (6VhAv8
1 "POLYGON AT ROSHAK RIDGE"
LOT 12
HUB AND TACK CERTIFICATION
NE 1/4 SEC, 7, T 2 S, R 1 At, W.M,
CITY OF 11GARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
SURVEYED MARCH 11, 2020
PREPARED FOR:
TAYLOR tvIORRISON, INC.
703 BROADWAY ST., SUITE 510
VANCOUVER, WA. 98660
I
al i
3,00' PUBLIC LOT 6,00' PU ....0
10.00' 10.00' UTILITY EASEMENT // UTILITY EASEMENT
. ..... 8
T
S89•54'00E 1 80.00)
,,, . i.L.1
b ,D
0 0 9- o z
\s• 0
1,1(0.
, rn
t..)
t 5,00'
17:25*---•-• .X.LLI
LOT WI H
ci. CO CI 1 2 .':) co
2 o to
.. 1--- - 0
.
(o
R ‹. p P
,
cr 0 tn
6 I- 0 i 0
Z --,..-.. 0
I S89•54100"E 80.00'
csi 0
,-- o
t,u
w 4
I
o11 LOT
1 25.00'
O 11
.....,,
'
u
/1 REGISTERED s"
ty
u PROFESSIONAL
f-- LAND SURVEYOR —6
IL
< OREGON
.-- JLILY g.2002 LOT
->, TRAVIS C. JANSEN 74
-_,.,
57751
.I
...
RENEWS: 6/30/2021
g I, TRAVIS C. JANSEN, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SCALE
t. SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF OREGON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 2,0 0 10 20
,?, I HAVE ACCURATELY SURVEYED AND STAKED THE OFFSETS no smi munin
. MIR MI
TO THE FOUNDATION ENVELOPE FOR LOT 12 OF THE PLAT OF 1 INCH = 20 FEET
o
3 "POLYGON AT ROSHAK RIDGE".
DRAWN BY: NLF DATE:03/11/20 --\\
PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN
REVIEWED BY: T2 DATE:03/11/20
:.
z PLANNING - ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
PROJECT NO.: 395-4)10
\.. ,, (503) 941-9484
—1
446T26(a-06 ) 1,1377 5iN I6b/11AVC
GEODESIGN? FIELD REPORT
Page 1 of 1
GDI Project: Polygon-1 13-05 Prepared By: ± Bret Moskal
Project Name: Roshak Ridge i 5/6/2020
Location: SW Bull Mountain Road and SW Roy Report#: 170
Rogers Road,Tigard
Arrival: 0845 Departure: I 0900
Weather: Overcast, 50s Permit#: MST2019-00210
MST2019-00076
Site Visit Requested By: Caleb(Polygon) Met With (on site): , Caleb (Via Phone)
Purpose: Observe Lot 12 Subgrade
Outstanding Issues: Park Slope Failure
Upon arrival, I observed the subgrade within lot 12 had been prepared. Subgrade generally consisted of brown silt
and had been covered with a thin layer (appx 1 in)of recycled crushed concrete. I used a Y2"diameter steel
foundation probe to evaluate the consistency of the footing subgrade. Resistance to penetration generally indicates
stiff to very stiff subgrade conditions.
Based on our observation and probing, it is our opinion that footing subgrade within lot 12 observed today, and
where indicated on the attached site plan, has been prepared in general accordance with our geotechnical
recommendations.
Distribution:
Attachments: Site Plan (1)
Reviewed by:
This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and
specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees
or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety. This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be
considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section.
Signature: Bret Moskal
9450 SW Commerce Circle,Suite 300 I Wilsonville,OR 97070 1503.968.8787 I www.geodesigninc.com