Report 3C'e .514✓ /41/,6Er6 14'r_- 7- 00 8 7✓
s�f g8 �
gl
G EO z yo
DESIGN_ 702 c�FIELD REPORT
Page 1 of 1
GDI Project: Polygon-164-03 Prepared By: ,Justin juggert
Project Name: River Terrace East No. 3 -Phase 2 Date: _ 3/30/21
Location: 16973 SW Friendly Ln,Tigard,OR Report#: 27
Arrival: 0945 Departure: 1015 _
Weather: Overcast, 40's Permit#:
Site Visit Requested By: Adrian (Taylor Morrison) Met With (on site): Adrian (Phone)
Purpose: Evaluate subgrade for Lots 265-269
Outstanding Issues:
On arrival, Adrian (Taylor Morrison) informed me that crews had cut subgrade to finished elevations within Lots 265-
269, as shown on the attached site plan. I observed that crews had placed —1-2" of crushed rock over subgrade. I
observed subgrade to consist of brown silt(excavation sidewalls). Using a%"foundation probe I evaluated the
relative consistency of the subgrade through crushed rock section. Resulting penetrations indicated generally stiff
subgrade conditions.
Based on our observations and probing it is our opinion that the subgrade observed today, in areas observed today,
has been prepared in general accordance with our geotechnical recommendations.
Distribution:
Attachments: Site Plan (1)
Reviewed by:
This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and
specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees
or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety. This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations. The report can only be
considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section.
Signature: t�
9450 SW Commerce Circle,Suite 300 I Wilsonville,OR 97070 1503.968.8787 I www.geodesigninc.com
r VI yy, ui I- I O4—U0 — r riz i — i/iU/LUZ 1
*Areas are approximate and not to scale*
'‘,:zt.... --- tc,,„„,„,„, .
OFFSITEIT mPMiINCTESS C49E ECONSTRUCTED �... �-.� !> L
wTET,wAwlPcroE collet DDr EDeews �y*^" ,,,,.. ...WE'!'-----=ysy'+' \ I
FKnP D1PNp/FA1F)f13.
TlfilliE Plus d� .l, ."*_�"' win. _ C
N�N6P 7 .. /I Em / 9 EK SEE 'K pill
aw i TROT ni i�
Um;P,10IOSTn .,g i..•.�\ '(� =" I 1 p ___ _Ir,c,m.- ;d 7
r"CTvPOLYGON Nw CDMPANY
1.
�' •`� I ?te=.+�n/,� --- I'acl l is
c\ — I: 11
P(Ili
>a >temeA gym., m — r ,~. �1. • , I_ ' *I Set-9,IA10,IFj5N9A1 9,&5
•N:EUAAEN { Tn1 _ i
PIE M. ny �11 ' % Y tmT SW ER•.•uYEN V s� - O PWARM? ,.m IONS
DATE NEV6ossun TON
/ .,,E.r. a %■a:_
Trv. I EIE.rm. VS
.., / . lF1Y�
< orocr iw I It • •
I/ ", I I , WARM J �..
EASEVEnr _
1 m 1�I.- / En y1 I i�.
f I %% pryAI J
ILINE TABLE I 7�
�e. eD•.G
371
I ;•�i,vl r�me , .. i/ via, _..r r. !! 1m : y I ,vet sn•K� /
,
1.m f.m + . 1111313231
¢ V 101 N' 9'9 5511 I r/
~-- ---3-__f i, n.m-_I ii I u mTE Set grin 1 � ltX
SY EOe6tEgl10W Gr / I U m.56 PI'et'1TE / ' � '� M.WfY/r/r/l.'ilri, •WMRSiY id'ffi AM'3YYx� I /i! ' ! LS 113.m MN'W SIE I gl
�•, sAWD1TA1• tv j /i� (`a' u at.n No.m',T4 -.�v / I %%I •�
.w OYEEAY PO[TTD. -- y p /%, 77 V LW Off Sm'K15E �J ' /�I
• •1, `P 'S1 ►/ / Dvlwauc m.uie
/fj
P. • 11• a\ -4 p %� CURVE TABLE I //.
i °IEY�i.`` wm.ofrwunwrovEUA. I �- WT. walla
Y ; �,y, ��'. ., UMW. ' River Terrace
K i . / ;* ! Cl .,.. Sr rx� East No. 3
i i'. ` I \ 1•: a i� i'; a met slim su•v,ac I �.
I I • ' 1\� ',� , o mom „a sw•Was it Construction Documents
' •�1•-_-`_ ` l /� {j • Cf ACV 4112 r."3:7
••, •EI1•R em••••E••11•••E••�•E•EEEEE•EEEEEI / I /'�' 1 Approximate location of is 1 LEGEND SITE PLAN
sysubgrade observed today
i • ----na®urinaE—
g• % EmST1ND NWT.-WAY %�
•� _.•� re •. • •, ., , P1EW�D nR•AND GUTTER I
F MILK
corny
mE
a —_—EnsTING VNiCE1NE S
-PROPOSED E unurY EisEENT PRDacr Po.: 115111
----PPbDfFD efIIDING SETS.. [OT61•ETpe
PROM.PROPERTY UNE w T'•EO 9Y: Q
j DmrlNC PfoarY LINE /ST sarrrk DATE vumT
OOSTNG•DIwoERY UTE MO SIMITI:IL DATE 3P15P7131e
}} TEA NUM mummer UNE
g PROPOSEPROPOSEDNAN WSW..RPM
PROPOSED WOO,RArs G
s
PROMSED we PAYING
;.�_ .. PRDaRDDuwAu 4
vii�i�PRDPDRnSIDEW.LKe.m,fla ,� SCALEELEVATION DATUM:NGVD 29 j earn.soewaA
' 1 "RIVER TERRACE NORTHEAST" —_,,\
LOTS 1-5
HUB AND TACK CERTIFICATION
NE AND SE 1/4 SEC. 6, T 2 S, R 1 W, W.M.
CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON
SURVEYED MARCH 10, 2021
I I
PREPARED FOR:
TAYLOR MORRISON, INC.
703 BROADWAY ST., SUITE 710 I
VANCOUVER, WA. 98660
LOT
1 6 0
I o
27.00' I S89'07'05"E i 69.50' 12.g5
2022'
I I !I
LOT II o
o
= Q I20.00'
I
S8907'05"E I 37.00' 5 S89'07'05"E 32.50' 12.50' N z
it
N00'S2'S5"E I QI LOT oQ N 4.67'°°-
4 cr
z rnc'Zi S89'07'05"E 69.50' N `` -
w g it
W Q z
g COUn LOT 3
a in 3 ,n
�
—
I S89'07'05"E 69.50' N
NI LOT o
0LAJ 11.1
ca 2 500'52'55"W
S89 07'05"E 37.00' 4.67' I
0 I
S89'07'05"E 32.50' 1
U
REGISTERED 20.00' I
4, i PROFESSIONAL L01 T 12.50'
= LAND SURVEYOR I
co
a.
N88'52'07"W 69.50' 129 1 -
a •"EGON -0I
a JAN. 14, 2020 (.1K' TRACT A r I
r NICK A. LAFOND
93484PLS RIVER TERRACE NORTHWEST
N
0 RENEWS: 12/31/2022 i
�' I, NICK A. LAFOND, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SCALE
2 SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF OREGON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 20 0 10 20
cp 0.
I HAVE ACCURATELY SURVEYED AND STAKED THE
o FOUNDATION ENVELOPE FOR LOTS 1-5 OF "RIVER TERRACE 1 INCH = 20 FEET
o NORTHEAST".
U)
s DRAWN BY: T2 DATE: 3/30/21 PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN
REVIEWED BY: NLF DATE: 3/30/21
Z 395-061 PLANNING - ENGINEERING - SURVEYING
PROJECT NO.:
___ (503) 941-9484
-,
ylv
GEODESIGN' ;` 7 FIELD REPORT
Page 1 of 1
GDI Project: Polygon-164-03 Prepared By: Bret Moskal
Project Name: River Terrace East No. 3 -Phase 2 Date: 4/21/21
Location: 16973 SW Friendly Ln,Tigard,OR Report#: 29
Arrival: 0845 _—_ Departure: 0945
Weather: Sunny, 50's Permit#:
Site Visit Requested By: Adrian (Taylor Morrison) Met With (on site): Adrian (Phone)
Purpose: Evaluate Slab Base within lots 265-269
Outstanding Issues:
Upon arrival, I was informed by Adrian (Taylor Morrison)that onsite earthwork crew had prepared the slab base
section for the living spaces within lots 265-269. I was informed that base section was approx. 24in thick and
consisted of recycled concrete sourced from Tigard Sand &Gravel. Compaction efforts were completed utilizing a
large walk behind plate compactor. Using a Troxler 3430 nuclear density gauge, I evaluated the compaction of the
fill and compared the results against a lab produce proctor value of 119.3pcf 14.3-precent optimum moisture
content. Initial testing did not meet our compaction recommendations of 95%compaction of maximum dry density
value.We recommended moisture conditioning the material and applying additional compaction efforts. After re-
compaction efforts slab base section met our recommendations. I observed the pin resistance (number of blows on
a%"diameter steel pin with a 6Ib hammer to drive the pin approx. 12in into the material)to indicated densely
compacted material.
Based on our observations, density testing, and pin resistance it is our opinion that the slab base section observed
today, in areas observed today, has been prepared in general accordance with our geotechnical recommendations.
Distribution:
Attachments: Site Plan (1); NDGD (1)
Reviewed by:
This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and
specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees
or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be
considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By'section.
Signature:
Bret Moskal
9450 SW Commerce Circle,Suite 300 I Wilsonville,OR 97070 1503.968.8787 I www.geodesigninc.com
i
1
GEODESIGNz NUCLEAR DENSITY GAUGE DATA
GDI Project: Polygon-164-03 Project Name: River Terrace East No. 3 Phase 2 Date: 4/21/2021
Sampled By: btm Project Location: 16973 SW Friendly Ln. Page: 1 of 1
Material Source Maximum Density:pcf(required) Optimum Moisture
A 1.5"-0 CR Tigard Sand &Gravel A 132.6 pcf (ASTM Dl 557) A 10.6%
B Baker(Farmington) Lvl II, 1/2"HMAC B 155.5 RICE B NA
C 3/4"-0 CR Tigard Sand &Gravel C 128.5 pcf (ASTM D1557) C 12.6%
D Recycled Concrete (Tigrad S&G) D 119.3 pcf D 14.3%
E E E
*Estimated depth below planned grade (feet)
Test
Date Location Elevation* Fill Type Compactor Density
No. Moisture Maximum Required
1 4/21 Lot 269 Slab Base - See Site Plan —0' D Lrg Plate 108.0 9.0% 91% 95%
2 4/21 Lot 268 Slab Base - See Site Plan —0' D Lrg Plate 108.7 6.7% 91% 95%
3 4/21 Lot 267 Slab Base - See Site Plan —0' D Lrg Plate 116.4 11.2% 98% 95%
4 4/21 Lot 266 Slab Base -See Site Plan —0' D Lrg Plate 105.3 7.4% 88% 95%
5 4/21 Lot 266 Slab Base (Retest#4)- See Site Plan —0' D Lrg Plate 112.9 8.2% 95% 95%
6 4/21 Lot 265 Slab Base - See Site Plan —0' D Lrg Plate 114.0 7.1% 96% 95%
7 4/21 Lot 268 Slab Base (Retest#2)- See Site Plan —0' D Lrg Plate _ 113.8 9.6% 95% 95%
8 4/21 Lot 269 Slab Base (Retest#1)- See Site Plan —0' D Lrg Plate 114.7 8.4% 96% 95%
90593196.xls
-:-.-.
6..
S..
,...,
, '''',.. Lel -..---.....• .--a
0.,,,,,c- -- -'''•-% --,:.----4-*s- - -----7:.:4"------777-7-
Q.A.)en.,Ten/Lace.,
- .
Off SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED Z I
k... 1
---'-----
------ - .,-
. EAR. 4IC i. I 6.• :
14 . - t ' i I POLYGON Nw COMPANY
...„,„.„
PUE 1TP, l & L-
'
I i _ r-,- N 1111100*
------- — -........--,%- 1•30.,.
-------.......--
.;i !....‘
II' ;RIZEILWE'ina-1=11
_-
_
t.oninitinm,
ii Illin 1,,,.11 imr....:4-1 '
I/
ga f. ( I 2-55 257 256 155 254 253 ''. i 11 I
6.W i -A
.„
,1,4 ,.` 0 ,, \,-- EPUE.11P ,03,761-9404 IF)a03-74,94135
.L.S.•-•----ri.,1---4--... LODOES1414,INC
'"•-,-,-,-;:-:;"-,,.%'-''''''''' " .!.......r -\„„,...--•---- _.---fk, MANI EASE.MENT 1 ' 6 & c.,‘
, --- .
DATE DESCRiPTION,
ANI , , : ., . . . 4111191111111111111M.
.;1, ; :..&, il TEMPORARY
TEMPJRARY . l ag gala....- 'i
274 0.,,,,Ri,'
LRAM. LI
CONSTRUCT. . ,r1
EASEMENT
i 2 ;-ff: 1
,,, f-4,.
-,. „ - ,
_ . 1, LINE TABLE >
...
.00U''' A
i
I 2270.017.002
4127.0010 .C...........
,,,
y i
J -. GAN.
I270 3 1 2 9 , II
.1 .
II, . U'Ll' LE'151.7: '56'9",::OTE
0 , -i-V-,,, illiIIMIlp
fin • '' 2 ', 43' I I 1 I '..........................1.,:::..) •1 PRO',
t., >, i••• 4$ :‘...' il,,f,O, II
____,.... 1;7 . ..-
0 IA : f,... -Al i 1.4 90.56 M3 01 1 TE Ce 1
,,:.. ,..,.../....... ,
'47-1 - - -F.4.,,..'1 !
-Wr I 04 eir-4, 1 , LS 113.0T N74.Se,372
--LL.1. ,SCIA11.0 A c r•Ae,. ...",,, 176,',":„. 6. j ——6. 1.... 0 t c, , iti'l' .1 . L7 229 00 5119..1TE
-?"4 - •"•.. ..,,,., ,-,' .",,..... U) Va.) X'.2 .. :,!,'„: ; I CURVE TABLE — I-L River Terrace
'' .I--' , • ''-',.
• 3— -....o' - ,; CC > 0)
CD
c East No. 3
'
r. . . . ,....., 1 CI 673.W 153.. SS 3a ml.= • -4' `.::.----:, 1 _____________44q-
0.
'!
co AC. 563 ST 101
r., Construction Documents
I!.. 1. . ,.....: ,. co .0 a) _.______,, ,,! Ill i C3 103 00 41 35 564 Or 22-E :
,
I.k
•:',74-4 I I-.70
SITE PLAN
! : - I-"•' I : ' . , - ,.•;',;'' 2 ' , '. '0",-f. ' LEGEND F.1
‘i ' '• — : 1. :: t., i. .,, , -,-;:::-ali,ott 1 —--—PROPOSED RIUNT OP WAY ,-,!--. V \ i I ' I ! A' . !..2--,,,• . .:40,i, 1 I C6 500 00 105.55 1463 56 161 ., ,,,,,,,,, .., ,,,,,,
PROPOSED COMMIE
i ——OUSTING CENTERLINE
-. PROM.PUBLIC UTIUTY EASEMENT PROJECT NO
TYPE 195061
CONSTRUCT.
a ,-,, a.., ____PROPOSED WILDING SETBACK
REVIEWED LT
X 0 Cfl PROPOSED PROPERTY LW
EMT.ROM,UNE ,
'24%'SUUTMITIIT';',1,0VE l'ar5
005.4 BOUNDARY LINE
MININIMIE MASI WOO.UNE
z m 4::: PPOPOSED NANDIC6P RAMP
i 0 rj 6
t...1 01 cp 0 "OPOSCO KEW..boo
' i I PROPOSED A.0 NNW>4.0 6.•
G
-c,
[..,-..._I PROPOSED SIDEWM11
1 0 C
as SCALE
O. < 4
, .....___...
1 INCH=40 FEET
' ELEVATION DATUM:NGVD 29