Loading...
01/11/1972 - Packet • TIGARD WATER DISTRICT F1941 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE (503) 639-1554 January 11, 1972 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF LAST MEETING 2. OATH OF OFFICE TO REELECTED COMMISSIONER 3. ELECTION OF OFFICERS 4. VISITORS „. 5. RESOLUTION TO PAY VOUCHERS . 6. RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT LOWEST APPROVED BID FOR PURCHASE OF 1400 GPM, 15 HP, 440 VOLT BOOSTER PUMP TO BE INSTALLED NEAR COE MANUFACTURING COMPANY ON HUNZIKER ROAD 7. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE LETTER TO METZGER WATER DISTRICT REQUIRING THAT A 10” FM METER BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO JUNE 30, 1973 ON THE 12" FIRE MAIN WHICH SERVES THE INDUSTRIAL AREA ON S. W. 72ND AVENUE 8. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE WATER RATE INCREASES AS PROPOSED, EFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 1972, IN PREPARATION FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 14, 1972 9. OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT ,410.0 ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 1. Resolution to approve minutes of last meeting. 2. Oath of office to reelected commissioner. -- Ken Baines will administer the oath of office to Verne Wheelwright. 3. Election of officers. A Chairman, Secretary, and Treasurer must be elected. 4. Visitors. 5. Resolution to pay vouchers. law 6. Resolution to accept lowest approved bid for purchase of 1400 GPM, 15 hp, 440 volt booster pump to be installed near Coe Manufacturing Company on Hunziker Road. Specifications have been prepared for an appropriate pump with low pressure head to push Bull Run water from the Baylor Street reservoirs into the Tigard area. Pump manufacturers will have quotations available on the date of the meeting. It is believed that the installation of this pump is necessary; however, it should be understood that this pump station will not resolve all of the problems in the distribution system and may do some damage. The following disadvantages are noted: a. Capitol Highway Water District may not be able to supply the large quantities needed at peak demand periods. b. Increased pressure head of 11 psi may be excessive and cause fire sprinkler systems and hot water tanks to malfunction. c. The 12" fire main on 72nd Avenue (industrial area) may develop a pressure loss which would affect the fire fighting capability in that area. „r,.. Recommendation: Approve. -1- 4.100 ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) 7. Resolution to approve letter to Metzger Water District requiring that a 10" FM meter be installed prior to June 30, 1973 on the 12" fire main which serves the industrial area on S. W. 72nd Avenue. This matter was referred to you by special letter dated December 21, 1971. It is now believed that this subject should be discussed in detail at a regular meeting. The contents of the letter are valid, and in my opinion, the matter should be resolved as soon as possible. The conclusion that a meter should be installed is obvious and should not antagonize the Board of Commissioners, Metzger Water District. As a matter of fact the TWD purchases water from Metzger Water District via a 6" compound meter (purchased by TWD) located at the Baylor Street reservoirs. This same water is used to serve their customers in the industrial area at no cost to Metzger. It is ridiculous for anyone to assume that such an arrangement can go on forever. Recommendation: Approve. 8. Resolution to approve water rate increases as proposed, effective April 20, 1972, in preparation for the public hearing on March 14, 1972. A discussion of the proposed water rate increases with data and charts are included at the end of this report. Recommendation: Approve. 9. Other business. a. Ken Baines will be prepared to discuss the status of the proposed purchase of a 105'x 150' lot located near reservoir #3 on S. W. 135th Ave. b. Alternate source of water: Elden Carter has discussed a rough plan to construct the large main from the City of Portland via Metzger and Progress Water Districts. He has several proposals on pipe sizing, and has suggested a pro-rata share of the costs be based upon water flows to each recipient. Tigard Water District capacity is estimated at 2600 gallons/minute or 257. of the total. tow -2- "moo ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) There are three pipe sections to be installed as follows: a. 4000 feet of 24" pipe to the city limit installed and paid for by the City of Portland. *b. 6600 feet of pipe from the city limit to Bradley Corners. **c. 5800 feet of pipe from Bradley Corners to Tiedeman Road where our 10" main is located. Following is "a" plan for consideration: Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 Water District *(b) 24" 20" 18" or participate **(c) 20" 18" 16" Tigard (257.) $ 72,000 $ 62,000 $ 56,000 Metzger 55,000 47,000 43,000 Progress 28,000 25,000 22,000 Wash. Square Shopping Center 78,000 67,000 60,000 w. Portland Golf Course 55,000 47,000 43,000 $ 288,000 $ 248,000 $ 224,000 Cost of a meter plus pressure reducing valves would increase the total outlay. I have indicated to Carter that a 24" main the entire route should also be considered. A 24" main will carry almost half again as much as a 20" main. If the installation becomes a reality it should be completed by August 1973. Mr. Robert Hyle, Superintendent of Portland Bureau of Water Works, has indicated that he is in favor of the plan and will do his utmost to implement Portland's share. We should be in favor of the plan if we can become direct users of Bull Run water. It should solve our source problems for at least 10 years, if not longer. Washington Square Shopping Center is in favor of the proposal; Metzger seems in favor; and Progress and Portland Golf Club are lukewarm. Elden Carter has been advised that you are definitely interested in the plan and that he should proceed expeditiously. We are available at any time to discuss the proposal further. -3- Avow ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) 10. Work accomplished by TWD personnel. a. Installed 720 feet of 8" C.I. pipe along 115th Avenue, north of Gaarde. (Pipe replacement program; replaces 4" O.D. steel pipe). b. Installed 280 feet of 12" D. I. pipe along Pacific Highway, near MacDonald Avenue. (New bond construction; pipe extension). c. Cleaned reservoir #4. d. Installed 26 meters. 11. Work accomplished by private contractors. a. Mr. McQuerry installed 1770 feet of 6" C.I. pipe plus 1 fire hydrant to complete phase 2 of Brookway for Mr. J.A. Paterson. 12. Work to be accomplished by TWD personnel. a. Install 1220 feet of 8" C.I. pipe plus 1 fire hydrant on 95th Avenue, south of Greenburg Road; and 410 feet of 6" C.I. pipe on Lewis Lane. (Pipe replacement program; replaces 2" galvanized and 3" O.D. ). b. Maintain all equipment, pumps, vehicles, etc. c. Test all gate valves. February a. Make "tie-ins" for 12" C.I. pipe crossings on Pacific Highway at five locations as follows: Greenburg, Johnson, Walnut, Park, and Watkins Avenues. Crossings will be bored and encased by private con- tractor. (New bond construction; pipe replacement). b. Install 3500 feet of 12" C.I. pipe plus 2 fire hydrants along Walnut Avenue, between Tiedeman and 121st Avenues. (New bond construction; pipe replacement). -4- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) March a. Install pumping station at Coe Manufacturing Company on Hunziker Road. b. Install 12" C.I. main along Katherine, between Tigard and Tiedeman Avenue. (New bond construction; pipe replacement). April a. Install 12" C.I. pipe along Hunziker and Scoffins to Main Street, including a fire hydrant for Pollack Investment Company. (New bond construction; pipe replacement). May and June a. Install 12" C.I. pipe along Durham Road, between 79th and 92nd Avenues for School District #23J. July Amw a. Install 300 feet of 8" C.I. pipe plus 1 fire hydrant on 150th Avenue, south of Bull Mountain Road, for R. A. Gray. (Completes a prior project). b. Install 12" C.I. pipe along Bull Mountain Road between reservoir #2 and Hi Tor. (Bond construction project; replaces 4" and 6" O.D. pipe). 13. Work to be accomplished by private contractors. a. Drill and encase with 20" O.D. steel casing under Pacific Highway at five locations. (New bond construction). b. Install 1770 feet of 12" C.I. pipe, 250 feet of 6" C.I. pipe, and 200 feet of 4" C.I. pipe plus 3 fire hydrants along Fischer Road, between 124th and 131st Avenues for Tualatin Development Company. c. Install 12" C.I. pipe from new Hi Tor reservoir to Bull Mountain Road. (New bond construction). d. Install 1250 feet of 12" C.I. and 100 feet of 12" D.I. pipe along Hall Boulevard, between Burnham and Omara Streets, including a Fanno Creek crossing. (New bond construction). -5- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) *00 WATER RATE STUDY The objective in increasing water consumption rates is to account for the following: a. Annual amount due for $500,000 bond issue: $45,000 b. Annual revenue loss due to illegal charges for multiple dwellings: $ 6,400 (Provisions should be made so that no rate increase will be necessary when the remaining $480,000 bond issue is sold). In arriving at a proposed rate increase the guidelines as listed below were considered: a. Tax rate would not be increased.-- This was pledged during the bond issue election. b. The monthly minimum of 600 cubic feet for $3.00 should be maintained. This provides some relief for those elderly persons on fixed incomes and,also, proves beneficial to those who conserve water. It is not this category of customers that has required the district to Orr• construct new transmission mains and reservoirs. c. Funds to pay the additional bonded indebtedness will be from revenue earned from those who consume over the minimum amount of water (600 cubic feet per month). d. Minimum charges for multiple dwellings based upon number of units will be discontinued, but the revenue loss regained by increasing the monthly charge based upon meter size. Most multiple dwellings have larger meters to provide the required increased capacity. (TWD will ensure that appropriate sized meters are installed). e. Each year an increasing amount 2f Bull Run water will be pur- chased at the premium rate of 38c/100 ft . Continued subsidization on such a large scale is economically unfeasible. f. The rate structure should be fair and simple so that the custo- mers are reasonably satisfied and billing procedures are not excessively burdensome. 44110, -6- �11r+ ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) A survey was taker, of eai:h customer's account to determine the amount over the „`ninum that was consumed during the past year. The following char-, shows the funds ,.L,at could. be raised by increasing the ra.,es over the :n: ni,nur i 10 intervals: (27,225,700 cubic feet of water over the minimum wer. cons 1 .jed during the: pas.', year. ) Increase in rate2 Revenue received (above 250/100 ft- ) (annually) 10 $ 2,722 20 5,44r: 30 ,1 166 110 10,890 50 13,612 60 16,335 70 19,057 80 21,780 90 24, 502 100 2.7,2.25 110 29,947 4110110 120 32,669 130 35,392 140 38,114 150 40,837 Some very informative data has been accumulated by the Columbian Research Institute regarding water rates charged by the 9 water districts and 2 munici- palities located in eastern Washington County. (see attached documents). This agency recently completed an exhaustive study on the economic feasibility of the Tualatin Hills project. Table 5 lists the past, and projected tax rates of Ale wager districts. Table 21 is invaluable as a guide when considering an increase in water rates. It is noted that TWD has, by far, the lowest annual cumulative (taxes and rates) waer costs in eastern Washington County of $67.80 for a household using 1500 ft /month living in a $20,000 home. A 100 increase in water rates over the minimum would result in annual water rate increase of $10.80 or a total of $78.60. Following is a table reflecting the annual increase and total cost per year over the minimum of 250/100ft (350 to 400) Rate/100f+:3 Increase/100ft3 Increase/year Total/year 350 100 $ 10.80 $ 78.60 360 110 11.88 79.68 370 120 12.96 80.76 `we 380 130 14.04 81.84 390 140 15.12 82.92 400 150 16.20 84.00 -7- ' wr ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) It becomes obvious that the large consumers of water and those with the larger meters will be required to bear most of the increased financial burden. This is how it should be. It is fair and reasonable to increase charges to those customers who are primarily responsible for the necessary capital improvements. It appears that the rates should be increased 150/100 ft3 for water consumed over the minimum. (Minimum = 600 fat for $3.00). This would mean an increase from 25c to 400 per 100 ft . According to the chart on page 7, $40,837 could be gained in this manner annually. For those meters 11" and above, two classifications have been established as follows: (1) Single family dwellings, churches, and schools. (2) Multiple dwellings, commercial, and industrial. (All size meters would be entitled to 600 ft3/ month without regard to number of units or families. ) The proposed increase in rates per meter size is shown on the attached chart. $6,833 can be achieved annually in this manner. To bring the matter closer to home the new rates were applied to each of your accounts and are shown on the attached chart. (Hope it does not embarrass anyone). You will notice that there is no increase due to meter size as you all have the standard 5/8"x3/4" meter. For those who consumed only a small amount over the minimum, the percentage increase is minimal. That is not the case for the large consumers. It is hoped that a decision on rate increases can be attained at this meeting so that preparations can be made for the public hearing on March 14, 1972. woe -8- MONTHLY PROPOSED METER RATE CHANGES $ $ 7. $ $ $ Monthly Annual Percent Annual Number Size Present Proposed Difference Difference Increase Increase 3181 5/8"x3/4" $ 3.00 $ 3.00 None None None None 167 1" 4.30 5.00 $ 0.70 $ 8.40 167. $ 1,403 7 (1)* 11" 6.50 8.00 1.50 18.00 237. 126 35 (2)* 11" 6.50 10.00 3.50 42.00 547. 1,470 7 (1) 2" 12.00 14.00 2.00 24.00 177. 168 37 (2) 2" 12.00 18.00 6.00 72.00 507. 2,664 3 (1) 3" 22.50 25.00 2.50 30.00 117. 90 2 (2) 3" 22.50 30.00 7.50 90.00 337. 180 ,iiir 1 (2) 6" 54.00 100.00 46.00 552.00 857. 552 $ 6,653 Fire Rates: (sprinklers) 12 3" to 6" 2.50 to 5.00 1.25 to 15.00 337. 180 3.75 2.50 $ 6,833 * (1) Single family dwellings, churches, and schools (2) Multiple dwellings, commercial, and industrial -9- EXAMPLES OF RATE CHANGES Clarence Nicoli Jack Wied 100 $ $ 100 $ $ cu ft Present Proposed cu ft Present Proposed Jan - Feb 35 $11.75 $15.20 17 $ 7.25 $ 8.00 Mar - Apr 38 12.50 16.40 17 7.25 8.00 May - Jun 33 11.25 14.40 22 8.50 10.00 Jul - Aug 67 19.75 28.00 65 19.25 27.20 Sep - Oct 87 24.75 36.00 24 9.00 10.80 Nov - Dec 45 14.2519.20 19 7.75 8.80 i 305 $94.25 $129.20 ! 164 $59.00 $72.80 377. inc. 237. inc. , 1 Roger Cowell Verne Wheelwright Jan - Feb 28 $10.50 $12.90 14 $ 6.50 $ 6.80 Mar - Apr 30 11.00 13.70 11 6.00 6.00 May - Jun 32 11.50 14.50 : 15 6.75 7.20 Jul - Aug 43 14.25 18.90 18 7.50 8.40 Sep - Oct 40 13.50 17.70 15 6.75 7.20 Nov - Dec 25 9.75 11.70 15 6.75 7.20 198 $70.50 $89.40 88 $40.25 $42.80 277. inc. 6% inc. Les Rawls Hugh Brown Jan - Feb 25 $ 9.25 $11.20 31 $10.75 $13.60 Mar- Apr 24 9.00 10.80 34 11.50 14.80 `'`"' May - Jun 28 10.00 12.40 37 12.25 16.00 Jul - Aug 29 10.25 12.80 71 20.75 29.60 Sep - Oct 21 8.25 9.60 67 19.75 28.00 Nov - Dec 28 10.00 12.40 38 12.50 16.40 1,53 $56.75 $69,20 278 $87.50 $118.40 22% inc. I 35% inc. -10- f "` a. .a,.n,�, iw`�•'+.-il.i sib '.r ..a ns'5. .^ay,�. _ _____-_ __ A'1%:.,'-°'*x. r p ossa ay. .. 'R tl/,,,i4, ' a xr'44 t • . i` s � � K a ' j 4 1 WATER DISTRICTS i Property tax rates for most water districts have been declining and are at relatively low levels. Most expenditures can be financed from connection charges and user fees. It can be safely assumed, ; therefore , that 1971 rates can be maintained or decreased except in the case of Metzger where additional bond issues are anticipated. It should be noted that there is discussion of combining the ;1 Metzger, Progress, and Garden Home water districts with or without the creation of Tualatin Hills. The major changes expected will take place in the Aloha-Huber, Metzger and Tigard water districts. Aloha Huber has constructed an intertie with Wolf Creek Water District. It will he financed from user fees and will not affect tax rates. It is possible that Metzger will float a $240,000 bond issue per, to pay for a 24 inch main from Portland and to finance other im- provements needed within the next five years. Additional funds will be necessary if the consolidation of Metzger, Garden Home and ,1 Progress materializes. Tigard plans construction of two, one million gallon reservoirs • and major transmission mains to increase the supply of Bull Run water which will cost a total of $800,000 to $980,000. These expenditures would be financed by bonds (approved by the District 's . voters in August , 1971) and paid for from user fees. T:sWe '; PAST AND PRO-IEC'1'IiD TAX RATES OF WATER DISTRICTS (Per ;;7.,000 Assessed Valuation) 1962 1 064 1966 1.965 1970 1912 1974 1976 Aloha - Huber .60 .52 .60 .85 1 .15 1..23 1..2 3 1.2"; Garden Home .25 .35 .63 .46 .46 .46 .46 .46 Metzger .58 .40 .55 .29 .19 .20 .20 .60 •• Progress 1.15 .50 .25 .12 .08 .16 . 16 .16 Raleigh .70 .33 .23 .16 .14 .13 .13 .13 Tigard .35 .33 .38 .33 .24 .24 .24 .24 West Siopo .52 .30 .32 .20 .1.8 .21 .21 .21 Wolf Creek .32 .48 .45 .39 .48 .45 .45 .45 Notes: • 1971 t_ax rates arc assumed constant. through 10/6 for all districts but: Metzger where a bond issue is posr>.ible. Witii Metzger's rapid rate of increase of assessed valuation, this should add no more than about 3 cents per thousand dollars to the 1971 rate of 17 cents. • A McKinley Water District also exists but makes no Lax assessments and is served water by Aloha-Huber or Wolf Creek on request. • See Appendix E f< r more data on water districts. elliNiUtAktimildgibMda****;, . 'a....aak-www" 3r. :.w• .k...r.�i'Jn ,+ex. ... ::r 1 P 1 y # « e *, ° *1 ,1 e t rt 0141V n'"4 r Y A i' ° 1: 1 F + y + . ae .* *'', .1 n, b':, fo«. . + .a t.. ;.'''''•*4.44041,,0-00, .r; +t ., n rz+ `4,00 , •i ;• 'MP, 4 ti " Y '` Table 16 POSSIBLE CHANGES IN COSTS FOR WATER OF AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDENT AT VARIOUS ANNUAL UNIFIED RATES A''' 1969-70 (Increase) or Decrease in Costs of Water with Cites or histrict Cost.* $75.00 $77.75 $80.00 $85.00 : Beaverton $ 72.00 $( 3.00) $( 5.75) $( 8.00) $(13.00) ' 4" Tualatin 123.60 48.60 45.85 43.60 38.60 'c :. Aloha - Huber 86.00 11 .00 3.25 6.00 1.00 1.1',,:"' ' Garden Hem, 96.00 21.80 ; j.05 16.80 11.80 ,Metzger 84.50 9.80 7.0', 4.80 ( .. 0)-(,; !'rugreur ''2.80 3 /.80 1 >.05 12.80 7.80 Ral e l20 70.00 1.00 ( I . /J) ( 4.00) ( 9.00) ITTigard 67.80 ( 7.20) ( 9.9)) (12.20) (1/.'20) ;.41,1 We:,t Slope 82.20 7.20 4.45 2.20 ( 2.550) Wo I i Crock 80.80 t.80 3.0> .80 ( 4.20) >+.. Note: For Example: A resident of Beaverton paid $72.010 in 1969- 70 for v.aLer. t. If a unified water roe were $75.00, he would have a ($3.00) increase t:.. in payment. if ',Ile rale were $80.00, he would have an ($6.00) increase. g�: A resident of the Gard+ a Hume District would have a decrease in + osts 4.k ; of $21.80 if tin water VOLe were $75.00 or $16.80 if the rate were $80.00. II .,' *Annual costs taken from Tab1 21 , Append':. E. was* , 44 The i ncrease or dc•crr.tse in property t,nx payment s l of c nr-it ! ax ; � code area and the prospective changes in the cost of water (taken from Mable 16) are shown in Table 17. From this table it is possible to tk see whether changes in costs of water combined with changes in property taxes lead to a net gain or loss. For the tax code areas which re- fleeted a change in property taxes of greater than ten dollars (for a $20,000 home) only �.n the cases of Tualatin, Garden Home "A" and M`` Tigard did the unified water rate tend to offset the increase or decrease in taxes. Thus, it can be concluded that while the changes k;' in costs of water can be important , they are not generally sufficiently 'arge to alter the conclusions based on projected property tax 4, payments. tw r 37 .. [ k: Appendix D BONDED INDEBTEDNESS The followir_ two tables show the estimated tax rates required to payoff existing bonded deb: (principal and interest) and a summary of payoff schedules. 0. Bancroft or proper_ improvement bonds are not included as they are related to specific properties and not the entire governmental entity. Table 17 * ESTIMATED TAS RATES 2E3SARY TO PAYOFF OUTSTANDING BONED INDEBTEDNESS: 1972, 1974 and 1976 et- 1972 1974 1976 Assessed Rate Assessed Rate Assessed Rate Bona Value per Eond Value Per Bond Value Per Payment (000) $1000 Payment (000) $1000 Payment (000) $1000 Beaverton $154,000 $242,185 $ .64 $1+4,000 $339,059 $ .42 $141,000 $ 474,683 $.30 r, Tigard 26,000 104,312 .25 26,000 161,684 .16 25,000 250,610 .10 Tualatin 45,000 24,519 1.84 41,000 36,778 1.11 44,000 55,167 .80 Tualatin Hills Park and Rec. 85,000 751,860 .11 85,000 977,418 .09 68,000 1,270,643 .05 Tualatin R.F.P.D. 13,000 277,140 .05 8,000 387,996 .02 7,000 543,194 .01 Aloha - Huber Water District 05,000 85,960 .76 54,000 128,940 .42 56,000 193,410 .29 Garden Home Water District 13,000 24,779 .52 12;000 27,257 .44 13,000 29,983 .43 Metzger Water District 12,000 82,400 .14 6,000 115,360 .05 5,000 161,504 .03 Progress Water District 10,000 34,331 .29 9,000 42,914 .21 -- 53,642 -- Raleigh Water District 14,000 47,719 .294 14,000 54,877 .26 13,000 63,109 .20 Tigard Water District 69,000 116,176 .59 68,000 168,455 .40 69,000 244,260 .28 Wolf Creek Water District 17b,000 302,713 .58 173,000 393,527 .44 190,00C 511,585 .37 West Slope Water District 10,000 117,565 .08 10,000 141,078 .07 -- 169,294 -- Source: The amount to be 7aii on bonds in 1972, 1974 and l'.1/-5 was divided by the projected assessed val-ation t= arrive at the figures above. i 4 3y' !''17": : 1 2 ,� ."; ' '4°:--_ � ..• x . '�. it � ; x �- xg.- �'� } :� . 4. s n`` - p .s�' n!... a +s. , -+�$ 3., 'a. •' 4. Table 21 ! `t"i" ,{ COSTS FOR WATER :N CITIES AND VARIOUS WATER DISTRICTS IN EAST WASHINGTON COUNTY: 1969-70 Monthly Annual Total . Charge Cast3` Annual Annual Per 1500Cost Water .-'.4:',:,-.-- - Minimum 1500 Cubic Paid Costs to _ Monthly Cubic Feet Per Tax in 1 Home- 1 ak Entity Rate Charge Feet Month Lela Taxes/ owners/ ALL' • City of 40c/100 cu. ft. under 500 $1.50/2 $ 6.00 $ 22.0 No Levy --- $ 72.00 -1;. Seaverten 25c/100 cu. ft. over 500 _ v"' City f 1st 300 Cu. ft. - $4.00 S4.00/3 $10.80/3 $123.60;• No Levy --- $123.60 " t''s: Tualatin 800/100 cu. ft. - next -00 600/100 cu. ft. - next 400 r 300/100 cu. ft. - over 1100 Vis•;' '- Summer deduction - $2.00/3 ";'- h. Aloha-E-_ber 1st 300 cu. ft. - $2.25 $2.25 S 5.25 $ 65.33 $1.15 $23.00 $ 86.00 `' ,Later District 250/100 cu. ft. over 300 �I„: - garden Rome 1st 400 cu. ft. - $2.65 $2.65 $ 7.30/0 $ 87.50 $ .46 $ 9.20 $ 96.80 "• i. -,:atar Cis*-'-- 400/100 cu. ft. - Next 400 cu. ft. ,_' �- fe 4 350/100 cu. ft. - Next 100 cu. ft. 45z/100 cu. ft. - Next 100 cu. ft. k * g 350/100 cu. ft. over 1000 Ln McKinley Where provided, water is furnished and billed by Aloha-Huber and Wolf Creek water districts :Water District • Metzger 1st 500 cu. ft. - $4.00 $2.00 $ 6.75 $ 51.00 $ .19 $ 3.80 $ 84.80 z 4 Water District 380/100 cu. ft. over 506 ,t (Billed 61-monthly) .' Progress 1st 300 cu. ft. - $2.20 $2.20 $ 7.60 $ 91.2; $ .08 $ 1.60 $ 92.80 Water District 450/100 cu. ft. next 5000 -- Raleigh 1st 300 cu. ft. - $2.50 $2.50 $ 6.10 $ 73.20 $ .14 $ 2.80 $ 76.00 :tater District 300/100 cu. ft. next 1700 - + Tigard 1st 500 cu. ft. - $3.00 $3.00 $ 5.25 $ 63.00 $ .24 $ 4.80 $ 67.80 ." il Water District 250/100 cu. ft. over 600 ' Tualatin Calle, Water 1st 100 cu. ft. - S3.50 $3.50 $ 8.78 $105.36 No Levy --- $105.36 and Seer Company 40C/100 cu. ft. - next 1000 320/100 cu. ft. - nent 3900 .Jest Slop_ 1st 1000 cu. ft. - $4.60 $2.80/0 $ o.55 S 78.53 $ .18 $ 3.60 $ 82.20 w ,..,tet Pi:tri_t 400/100 cu. ft. next 1000 .` 350/100 cu. ft. next 1000 (-illed bi-monthly) Wolf Creec 1st 600 cu. ft. - $5.00 $222.50 5 3.94 $ 71-2.: S .48 $ 9.60 $ 80.80 = - Gator _:strict 320/100 cu. ft. nest 1.00 24`/100 cu. ft. ovtr 2000 -:"i (Billed bi-monthly) 14 "- 1 Assume ,i uou,e of .i10,.aD0 value /4 Deauc-it for summer months 51.50 lemand chane /5 i,._luaes ur__. c charge of 50C -' . .i;tag gun(•, Oily .,a:. :1L 'a,t , 8_22 is ic_....te.. 'e, , n the ill.