Loading...
12/07/1993 - Packet .....„:„.:............:...,.................................... ............x....„...............,.............:....................................x........................•••••••---•••••••••• ••••• .................,••••••.....................................••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,,••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••,••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-••••-•••••• ..............................................-.............,...,••••••••,...•••••••••••••••••,.•••••••••••••,,,,•••••••••••••••,..",•-•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-•••••••••••••••••••••-••••••••• ., .. . „......,.......____,..........,................,......„....................•.......•••••••••••••••...........••••••••••.••••••••••'•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,••••••••""•""••••' •'''......" .••• .................................................................... . ...... .. ... -..............................----........................................................................................................ .............................................................. .. . . .. ... ...WATER............... ...................................................................................................................... .................................................................. . .. . .. ............. ............... ................ ............................ .. . . . . . ..DISTRICT.................................................-.....................................-...... ...........,......••••••...... ...........,. .. . . . . .. - . ......•'':........•••••••••••••••,,•-••••••••••••,-- .............................................................. . . .. .. . . .. .. ••••••••--""""---"""••••—•---- ' * ' - " • -""""••••• --"•""••• """"""" •••-• ................. ••••••......,...................-...............•••••••••••••••-• •••• • ••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••"••••••• ................•................•••..............................••••••••••••••...•••••••••••••• •• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••• ••••••••• ••••••• • ••••••••••••• •••••••••••• ----- ••••••••••• ............. ............... .............. ••••••••••........••••••••..................,.....,.........“................... .................. ••••••••••••••••••••.....,...•.,:•••••••••••••••••.......••••••,•.••••••••••••••••••• ...... .:.:„.............,.:...................,....................,,,,,. :::::.:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::,,,,x.:•:•:•:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'::::::x.x.:•:::::::::::::'''''''''''"'"'''''.:.:...............x.:.......... ...'..'' ............ . •••• BOARD.. . ...COMM.................................•:.:•:.:.:.....:••••••••••:•:•:•:,•:•,•••••••••••••:•:•••:•:•:•,:•:.:,......:.:',,,,..............'•.:•:•:.:.:•:.,:......:.:.,,•••••••........ ............................... ............... ..... .. . ... . . . . .. . . ............................................................................. ••• • - -••• • - • • •• •• •••••••••••••••-••••••••••••••••••----•••••••••••---- •••••••..........••••••••••.......••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-•• - •••• • • • • •• • •• •• --••••••••••-•--"••••••••-------" ..................................................................... . . . . . . .. . . ........................................................ ............................................................................................................................. . . . . . . .. . .. . . ........................................................... ••••••••••••"""•"*"'"""'""""-------"""""""--•••"----"""•••••••"--""""""--""------ " •• •••• """"••••••""""••••••••••••••••••""-y••••-•-•-•"- ........,..............................................................,..............,.....%.......................--.......•••••••••%%%%%•••••••,,,%.%%..••••••......,...................•••...................••..............................................................••••••...............,.......... .:,,,.........,,,,,,...:....,........................:.:.,......................:,:.:,:.:,:,:,................,,,,,,,,,......X.X.:•:.,.....•••••••••••••,,,,:.:.:.1.:•:•:•:•••••••••••,,,:•••w•y""",.:•:••:•:•••:•:,....,:.:,•:•:•:.:.:.:••••••••,,:.:.:•:•:•:•••••••••••••••••••,•,••••••••••••••.•...............X,.•••••••••••...................•.:.:.•.:••••.....:.............:.:.:.:. AGENDA.....•...;•::::....................:.:......:...„..............................:,....;.•••••,.....-....:::::;•••••••••••••••••-••••••••••••••••••••••:•:•••••••-•-•••••:::::::•••••••• .............••...•••••••••........••••............ -.............••••••••................. ••••••••••••,,,,,.. ... .. ................................. ............................... -.............. ........ .. - •• •• - " .............................................................. ............................................. .............. ............ ........ ............................... .............................................................. ........... ........... ........... ........... .......... .. ............... ............................................................................ •••••••...............................................••••••••••••••••••••••••••...................... ..............,........................„,...........•..........“.....•••••.........•••••••........... ••••••........••••••••••••••,...,••••••••••••••,........••••••••••'.W.W.••••••••••••••,,,,,•••••••••••••.• ••••••••.....••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••"•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • ••••••••••••••••••""•••••••••"''•."•••••••••••.•--•••."•'W.'s."'••".••-••••••••...•"•••• ................................................................................................••••••••••.....••••••••••••.....%%•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ,.......................................,................................................,........................,.........................,....,....................................,...................................................................... iii:::.i!iiiiii::ifgliiiiiiiii,ii.g.iii.1::::::::::..i:::i.I.MEMiiiiiiiii:::::•:.iiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiNi:i:::., ..••:. .S. :• :::../.::::::• • ... /111beri':"....:::: : • :::::::%*:*:::%%..............::.:.:":"...f.....:.:;:*::::...... ".. .......................................................................................................%.............,,,,,,.............................:,.............:•:••••••••:•:•:•,,,,X.X.X.X.X•:!•:•:•:•••••••••:•••••:•:•:•:•:•:.MX.1993:•:•.•:•:.:.:••••• •:•:•:•:•:•••:•••••••;:::::,,,,•••••••••••••••::::::::::,:••:•:•:•:••••:.......:•:::::::::•;•••:•,:••••••••••:., .... ............. .................................................,.....,...........................................................,....,,,,,,,,,:.f.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,••::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•.,X,:::::::::::::::::.;::C•f:',...::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•,,,,,,,,,,•:•,.....".:::::::•••••••••••••:•:•:•:". ..III:J!i:I:s....:.::%:..........."....:..Ziiiiii"".."...""".....:::.;.:•"".."".;:iiiiii:iiiii:::ii....:i:•:.;i;.;.i.:..w............;:'...."....................7.......':•:•:•itt::::::.:.:.:'''':':::::':.:'.........:.':.:.:.•::•::::::::?:::.....::...',.:"..:::::.:1:.:.:::.:'.......:.:.:.'•:."....:i:i..i....:........;:;:'' .:::.:.:.:....................:....:.:.:.:.:. .......................................................................................:.................................................................:::.............:.:...,.....:....!....................7...•..:....•....1.1.:!....:!....7.•:11.t...:::..:..•M.....•••.•....•...1..•.•..•1•••••:..1::.,.••:.••••••••••••.:••••••....•..........::.:I!11.1!1•••.•I.::17.•1•1:11.11.•....•....•.....•..1...:.:.:•••.:•••.•..!.•..:::::::.::::::...1.1:Ill!::.:........:...:.=.:Ill:::.:Ill:1 f.:,:.!..,I......:11::::::,:•7......:....................!.1'.•'.1:::!!!"...1::.:..•••.••••••••....::..11:::. .......................................................,..................................................................,......................................,...................,...................................................... ................................,..............................................................•••••••••••••...,••••••••••••••-••••••••••••••..••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ...............................................................,.........,....,........................••••••••••••••..,•••••............••.............••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,••••••••••••••••,, •••••••••••• ..............................................................,........,......,..........•••.............••••••••............-..............•............%•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,%••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.%•••••••••••• ...........................................................................................•••••••.............•..................................•••............••••••••••••••••••.,••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .....................................................................,....................................................,.................•••••••...............................•••••••••••.....••••••••••••........•••••••••...........•••••••••• ..............................................-....................................................,•••••••••••.,.......••••••••••••.%%•••••••••••••••••.,••••••••••••••.,,,•••••••••••••••,•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••,••••••••••••••••••••••• ......................................................................................••••••••••...••.••••••••••.•••..•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••'•"••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••--.••••.••••••••••••••••.•---•••••••••••---- •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••"•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••'.... ••••••••••••"••••••••••• - ••••••• .......................................................................................................,....................%,•.................•••••........,....”.“.••••••••••••••••..............••••••••................•••••••••......W,•••••••••.........•••••••• ..........................................„...............,..,...........................„..............................................,.........,..................................................................................................... ................................ ............................................,..., ............... ................................ ••••••....................................................................................... ................... .............................• •......................................................••••••••••........%••••............••••••................................................................................................ ....••..................••••.............••••••••.........•••••••••••••••.....•••............,.........................................................w•-•••••.,,W.••••••••••,,,,,....•••••••••••,........•••••••••,,,,,,%%.••••••••••••••,%%••••••••••••••• i,..4..:.....liiii!..pit.i..:f.0:.:okdoe,:::::::::,:•.;.:.::::iiiiii:iilli§ilip.ii:]iiiigiiiigiii:::::.::",...:i.i.:',..........,:::.:,.:',:i:',.:: ::il:•:...i.,i,i:i'iii:.:::i•::::::::::.::.:::.::iiiimi:: :::::::0.::-: 1:':•.•••••••:::::: *':*:::".".:"."•••••••••••••••••••••••••••:•••••••••••••••••:••:::•••••:•:::*.'*':•':.;:;:.;:.::'•••••:•••:,•"."....'..•;',..."•••••• .............................,.......................................„......,..................................................................................................................,.................................................................................................................,........,.......................:.......,.......,...-......................-.........-.--,,--,,- ............................................................................................................................-.............................--------....------......----.........•----- ...........................••••..........•................••••...............••••••..............................•••..•.............•••••••••••••• ••••••.••••••.„.........••••••••••....••.•-•••••••.......••••-••••••......•••••••• .........................................................................................................................................................-..............................-........................................................................... tors•!.......: ::..::."..:..:.:,...,.:....... ::::•,• •:At.i:: :- :.••tne•owwwt"•0601WP14"..:...:1$11:.:1: 0.'..x.iiiiiibiii""•:":::"T-11..:::glittRaf rs:f••711t.Ar..t.ele.•e14.i'it''' i.":',",.:::„i:.:*if:f:':.•i•... .ii.i....,,i...ii..io••:!••:.::::.::::::.:•iiii.:.i.,::.ii::: iii.":iww:.•A:.::,:.• s.::*:::::.,::*•::•:•: - •:::::•:•,•,•:-.:..,,,....,:ii::: :•.•....,:"-.",,..:.,......,:::,,i,"::-.":•:":i,,...:•••:,„.4,:-.,•... --...„.•••....lat.......: e ...........may yAai:Tecetv.-..i:your.00m:hit:tar;i,i;i:"•::•:•:•:•:•e . tif::.::::::::wiff....":•:::"..*".. .. .....::•::::*::i:i:i:i::::::::.**•.,::: " "..,","....:::::::.:••.::.:::•:::::.,.::::.::::::::::::."....i".............:,...) .::••••.,i'i.::i:...iiiiiiiim...................................:...13.....:::::::::.........miam.........atif,.: :::.i.4,, .... ':.........aiwig,4.4aTINii:i§kiggp..stobvsthitit.dtiit;i5iiiiii0i:ifig.,:,VMAtiii:" 15:Fipgrta14tlMtaihgiraMiii::.iiiii6iiiii.iiii4:414jifijisiiifAigkiwaifrif :: ts aciiti)....61iiiiii0Wriiliiiiiiiiiiiii'i.i: 11). rlll'1llgl!11524.iP'91 . .,....iPARRIIIIIM.4P0::::ii,t0t41.w..vwo,..m).goorispoly,Itiritipte or..t.cpgrq . -..........:.-.........:::.:::. ....„........,:ii]:?-10T ::: rw13giiig ...iiiii:iii:Aii,o,:i,:i•iiiiiiima::::E•ii.t.iiiii:iiii::::.:.?:.iiigiiiimi.iii:::0":••..":••...0•.: •:•:.•a:a"..........:"......ww. :0;•:•:.iii:"•::::::0'.. .: ...i.•:".................::::::..s•Rt coiliftittiditi6itgiiikiiii .:"::.iiima",i*"..:ii,siiiiiiiiaiiig:if,":::.:iiiiff,....iiiiii":•:"..:a"...:>::i:E.:::::•:•:0:K*iiim.ii:iii•::.i:•::"..... ":*"::."•:":•:."•••.•:•:."..:.:.,.:i......iiiii .......:::.:.....i........::::.....5.....gu:::::::...............:•:.:•........,:.*:i: ii...,,:i*.:::::::::::::. iiiii.x.ii....p1;1.!.:Rm§:::.mtrtuf..0,4i:As.5u.otusitto";:vi*:.::.:.i.,...:•?::.:',..,if,i:.::.:*.:*i***:.*,.::.:',....:*•.:,.:*•.,.*:::::::::::::i*.,"::":*if,i*i::::::::::::.,K,:*:.*i*K,.:,.:...::::::::::.:::::.*i*,..-:::*•:::*: :::•,:i::::.„i:::i:::„ie::••:::„:::•••:::„,:::.0::„.,:::„i:i:„••::•',„„.."1::..:.a:.4:":••i••.m.:•on....:..::...:::..:a.,...t...ii.i4ii.ti-.....Ai„......:i...i...,",i.:•:::.•:••.."::•.:":in"it.":...,di1:..:...:.**ii::::•*i:i:.f:-k::•:.i:::*:oti:::::mi:::•-.:::i:fviJi...i:.:...i:wr:.t.•:*i*.itK..t9"::„::,::,,:::::,i,,••.:,:.:,i:.."..:........:.w.........*.:..l*..:m....:.::..:*.1•:.:i..•:*::.:.::i..1:f.::..Pa*...*•m.m0voOgrt0:i:•.::•::Ai03ttmm.Oigfi::.::•.:ii:li:ain:&pi*itx'.o•i*Lot,•••a*:::::g::„::::::::•::::::::%::::::::;tjeiat•:.:mi:i'iii'oi:.::•::*:'i':i:i'i*.:'.:'i".:)e*i.m:•:*:::w water 4.ganteftebiiitSilffipittbi.tt.: Ard,Water ) frtet :•:••%•••:••••:...:'i..:iiiii".••ic:*:•":•.••i•••*i•i"i::i.•.i.••...t'.••is::•i:t'•:i.:::::i::.:•..;':iv••:i•.,*:••:'i••: i .."•••: .::...i..:....g.:.a.,f;.:.::-ir:,i.,i,.:,::i:f;moiii:.:Qip:m.i.:::.:]::::.i::.:i:.:...i.i:..i.:.R.::,::m:iiiinmpiiiiiiii.:.i.w:::::glli.,iiiiigmi:.:::::::.i:::]i.,iiia::.::.::w;w:: :::.:::..ugm.i::.giimmgii:..i:: RrPP.tatifeOof::i.00.tigtitrif.keiiiiiiiiailii.1iaiilvi:: i ::: .::::::.n::moEwm.i.i::. .mgm.....:...i..:.:::: ...i,,.. . :-.--....:::-::.,.:.:......... .s.........-].:...::...:....:.P.ii-i.i*:.w0.0::ON:tOW044:0.ca.tonf:Ofi:4:000.•:•::::::::::: : •'.:]:::::::'•:•:]::::......*::::::::•::::::•::::::i::....:•:'........ ::::::::::::::::*.:::•••••••••::::6::::::::..triiiiii"if:Alpiiiiiplyiwivr,,,:•:•:•::::*"..,i:i*i:.:*•..*::::::::::::::•*"..:"..*"::x::*::::::::::::::::,.*:*i*"..:"..:"..:i,.::::::::::::::::::"..*:::::',...:"..::::*::::::::::::::::.:::":*m:i*:,,,.,::::::::*]:',.:*"..::::.:":::::::.:-:•...:::::•:::.*:.* Ak.:•.....:.:.•:.:•:.:. :...s.:"...."•,......., ........."::::„..,...1•A.".0..".:ii.i::: ..ogr3OtetititittligiaiidAiii.i.iwi:• 11i.:.6.:.::i.""isass:6:*.E...k.'64eLH4ive:::::S...16.":,...":4'6.)..ri:.:.:.: .i.i.iiiii.iiiii•IbildiijitilisiViiiiiieiiiiligratigi•04....1 • „.qippyzgiiim:ii4t 0',. ...ati...,......:1,.....-ffiOn,:mi-i. •—•••-:" .igessa. .:•:•:.:::.:•i:A: •••gi::iiiiV•iiii:::iffiinimebiii.....:•:d.7417M$1.•:4.iii'ii.&#0k#tVgt:iifiif.X.::ISMiidl,..wo$wrealArt.ii•OpitY l#R#F:MgilfgP:,99llgii..mgg$,;tglg:o.g5oiitti.::ocissibtdittj:ggia :MO Imi.•••••."difig....:.,:i.tim::::::aiii•:::i..:ai.•::.:!.::.iii:iiiiiii.•::glif:iiii:::i:1:.imiiilii.i:•.ii.m."....:"...aii..:::•:::•:]":ii:::::::1::iii:::.1.i.i.:;•:•.&•.•?:•,...0::.gm. :E:i::iNg...ggi•ii.m.i•gim................g.......:...................,...i..": •.•:iiiiiiii.."••:.".....::.••....i.::••.:•.,. .i':iii••• •••....................••••::::::. ....]]•::::•::•••.i..:•.•••: usmess i'...i...w.g.iii.:,.....: iiimmm.::::..":•:i.miiiirs.iii:m.railiiii.ii.":i•ii.:".••:.'.......:••..::••.k:•••• ••.•iiissi.mgmiiii.iiiiiiiii?:.:',.."....ii.a"....:"........:"..:"..:"..:"::•::•,:•::.:.iim:":::.::.:"..:•:::.:ia"...:"..i.::.iiiiiili::.*".......:"..:"......,:g....:.....,.:i ",..:•:•::-.J...:•:::::.:.:...*...,..:]:]:.....:....,....f..:•..::.*•..",:',..,.:.:::.::.::.:•:•:.•:.:]:.:::.*:::::•::•:"::::::::::,:',...,,,.., 9•z"::.iiBoaf.itpdfifvftiiiii-iirirmf::.:::::o:uo:iiii.iiiiimii::?:u::::::::::::::::::::::::x:i::::ii::::::::ii.:ii:Ni:::.:::::?:i:ii:p.uiiiiii:p.ii:ii:i:iiiiiiiiiii:iii.:iiii]i].:]]: :::: :::?::.::::?::.i.::::ii:igi:iiii?:::i.:::.:ii::::i:i:i:i::ii:i::::::?::] omments i.11::ii::...::9...........:....:.:......:..!..g.i::Next ivfootiogiO4ttm.....:i.ig::::::::..i:::•::iiilni.iiiiiiiiiiiiingii :::::::ff,:agaiiminimmiiii.ii...iii:i.::::iiiiiiii.,..........:i.:0-........:;.....im::m.m.:::::::::•:a::::::::::. ..:]:0.:::::::.::;.::.:.:„.....:?;::.:mo::::•,...i...imi.il.ii..:i:w.:::E.m.:.iiiiii.ii.;,.....g.:::::i..:::::.i.,......... .,...iiiii:E:: :m........;:gumgiono.:.. ........0..:0::::ii.:.ii.ii.... .....:...:::•:.....:i:ii.. ............:::-::::::::....:Nag................]:x:::::?........o.miiii:.:iimiiii...i...ii.,..:::.*:•*.......,. gtviiiiiMi:60:Miiiciiiii:iiiiiiiiigilaiiiiiiiiiiiiiMii,:iiiiiiiiiiiii:$iligi:Mir]iiiiiii$i,:niiiiiiigli'ilM:::Egi.,immingiummanisai, i::igam:::,::::::::,:ig:::::,t::::: ........ .....,......................................................................................................••••••••...............•••••••••••.......................•••••••-..............."........•----"................--•.... .....................................................................................„•••••••.......w...„•••••••...„..............•••••••.....................•..••••___.....•••••••._•••••••••••••...........••••••••••••_•••......•••••••••••••...............•••.•••••„.......„ ...........................................................................................................................................................................................••••••. ....... ..............................••••......... ....................................................................................................,..........................,..............................................,........................................................._.......................................... ••••••••••...... •••••••••••........„••••••••••......................„..•••••.............................................................................................................................................„....„..•..................................•••.............•...•.•........_.•..„..........................................•_..................... •:.:...iii::::::„Ti.:::i•i::::::::.:Iimms:.::::::::.::::.ii.i....imiiigip.imig.:§ii:::::i.ii.i::::.ii.i.iili,:.:iii.ggim:::::::::::::iii.....,........goimmi:mmii:mii.iiiiiiiii...::::::.:::::::iimi,::::::::::::::::::::::.i....:i*:,::::.:.::::.::::::::::.:::.:::::::.:::::::::::::.,.....:i:i.......*]*:::::.:*?::::::::::::::::::::::::::i*:;:*K::::::::::::::::::::::::::i.:::::::::::::, TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES November 15, 1993 DRAFT Board of Commissioners Present: John Haunsperger, Chair; George Morgan; Beverly Froude; Lou Ane Mortensen and Art Pedersen Staff Present: David Knowles,Attorney; George Mardikes,Attorney and Leslee Gemmill Visitors: Linda Whalen and Betty Polson(for a brief time) 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. Minutes of November 2, 1993 meeting Art Pedersen motioned to approve the minutes as submitted and George Morgan seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. 3. Visitors Guest Linda Whalen expressed her concerns about several issues to the attention of the Board: 4. There was lengthy discussion regarding the many recent letters and communications written to and from the City of Tigard regarding the City's efforts to form a water department. One avenue the TWD Board is still willing to accept is an arrangement where JAVA would contract with the City of Tigard for the delivery of water and the City would become the manager of the water system. It is the opinion of the City's legal counsel during a recent conversation with David Knowles that this idea hasn't been fully considered by the City and still may be an option for consideration. Further discussion included the limited options available to this Board and pertinent concerns about including future unincorporated development/growth management, uniform service and rates, existing water contracts and the division of assets. The Board agreed that effective communication with the City of Tigard is important however meeting with the council tomorrow evening at 7 pm is premature at this time and a date in the immediate future should be considered for such a meeting. George Morgan motioned that the Board (1) seek proposals from not less than two qualified consulting engineering firms for the allocation of assets and (2) move forward expeditiously to contract for the fulfillment of a proposal. Art Pedersen seconded the motion. Hearing no discussion, a voice vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. Tigard Water District Special Meeting Minutes November 15, 1993 At this time,the Board discussed certain areas of the proposed Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Tigard and the Tigard Water District for Delivery of Water Service to Territory Within the District Boundaries. Because the agreement wasn't received by Board members prior to this meeting, each Commissioner was asked to review the agreement in detail and make any suggestions, additions, deletions and corrections available to Leslee as soon as possible for transmittal to George Mardikes in preparation for John Haunsperger's meeting on Wednesday,November 17 at 5:30 pm with the mayors of King City, Durham and Tigard. Chair Haunsperger called for a recess at 9:45 pm. The meeting reconvened at 9:52 pm. Commissioner Morgan motioned that Tigard Water District agree to the City of Tigard becoming a water system provider subject to conditions that rates and conditions of service be equal for both the City of Tigard and unincorporated rate payers and undeveloped properties . Commissioner Morgan further motioned that the City of Tigard demonstrate an ability to become an active participant in the formation or support of a regional or sub-regional water supply network in order to provide District customers with reliable sources of potable water delivered at the lowest uniform cost. Commissioner Froude seconded the motion. After discussion, a voice vote was taken and the motion was approved unanimously. 5. At 10:10 pm, the Tigard Water District Board of Commissioners went into Executive Session under the provision of ORS 192.660(1)(h) for consultation with legal counsel concerning legal rights and duties. At 10:35 p.m.,the special meeting of the Tigard Water District reconvened. Commissioner Morgan motioned that Tigard Water District Chair be authorized to consent to continuation of legal service of Davis Wright Tremaine conditional on the acceptance of the proposed draft outlining the possible conflict of interest dated November 15, 1993 forwarded to the City of Tigard. 6. The next scheduled meeting of the Tigard Water District Board of Commissioners has been scheduled for Monday,November 22, 1993 at 6:30 pm. 7. The meeting adjourned at 10:50 pm. tN PORTLAND POWER ID :5032865450 DEC 03 '93 10 :41 No .003 P .02 • BRISI3EE & STOCKTON LAn:Y A. $1ies88H Areorups re Lau WJt>LLth1 N. 6T O1 Tmm 1St N.B. LINCOLN 6TRE,8T Of Cevwarl P.O. BOX ail CARRELL F.BRA1mLei CLARY I-BALI MJ1 rn LSBORO,osaaori imam KATHeara A. ARA-ry TELEPHONE(SW)648-607 SARUARA L.jb11NurrON VAX tS03) 64J-1091 GOMM W.VR&u xf`AX MWSSWOW TO: Tahn Haunsperager FAX No. 206-5450 ='Ia601d! Clark T. Balfour DAT*t Dotember 2, 1993 REt Tualatin ValJ.ey water Di.atriot/UQarti WaLer District brief Outline et possible options for TVWD/TWD, I wow* with your analysis appearing in the handwritten notes. It seems trot if you siva the Ilk with the City Of Tigard, you will not be able to yet out, at least for five years and this will saki itpossibla any attempt you may have to enter into a 1310, merge or form a water authority or oth*rwise negotiate a long tare supply centre 3t. Specifically, you cannot negotiate a separate longterm supply contract as Z read the agreement and you will be at the moray of the city. Let me kAow it you want anything further from Matin Valley Water. D Orioinal wia.l be forwarded by regular mail. 14- Original will not be forwarded by xeguler sail. This fax transmission contains `" pages, irut;1udin this cover sheet. it you do not receive all pages, please call oars 1Iortentine at 648-6677. Thank you. 1 0 .4 Na O.L 'O O-L a se A 3 s3 rs I M e * 7ry Ar g is : '7r [-1 t R .?,; (1 r^. 1 , PORTLAND POWER ID :5032865450 DEC 03 '93 10:42 No .003 P .03 Possisli OPrYQis OOt TVWB/pro 1. Chapter 190 Operating Agreement • No Boundary Commission action necessary • If proposed City/TWD LOA signed then it would a.-equire termination Of the agreement and a five year waiting period before administration, 0 & M aervioee can be provided by TVWD. • TWD and TWA negotiate and execute an agreement a. TWD make* all decisions within its boundaries b. TVWD provides administration, 0 & X to areas within TWD at mutually agreed upon levels and retea• TVWD .reimbursed by TWD for Coats A$ etgraed. o. 9DCe and rates act by TWD. CIP Adopted by TWD. a. 'Financing inaarovemonte could be by TWD aole..y or the 190 agreement could allow a joint obligation thereby allowing TWb to obtain a better rating from the larger entity yet keep ;.he debt with TWO. TWD will not he responsible fear any TVWD obligations. • puree Contracts and rates could bo inoluded in the 190 Agraomont • Term as long Or as Short Aa dpaired 2. merger • R.esolution of both uistricto • ?faLitiOn of the boundary Commiagiorn a. Must h;ve ecdnomiC feasibiliLy analysis particularly emphasizing rates and eefficieenoY b. The estimated tax rate, it any. c. Describe services to be provided and how service presently provided d. Projected firaL three year lino item budget. e. Describe how enterprise la merged, employees, etc. f. Describe needed capital improvements and debt distribution plan. Typiea2 to )wave debt within Lhe respective entities so ths&G one is not paying for the other. g. Rates can provide for costs peculiar to aerviae areas so that one arca is oat subsidizing another. • If approved, than final order effective nn next succeeding i•iscal year unless election regnirod by remanstrafca_ aligned by 100 voters or if A tax base involved (shouldn't be necessary here) . • Convene both Boards. If smaller district is less Lhsn 25% Of •the larger da.atrict, the larger Boars continues. Xf larger than 25* the two Boards elect one 5 member bea=d to serve until statutorily called eleoLlan. F: o .; m o.L]t".,S' o s.s 'R 7I n et ex Y 't3 M * vv.-t g t : 'LL n PS '20 ?_ i PORTLAND POWER ID :5032865450 DEC 03'93 10 :42 No .003 P .04 (A) There is provision iii the 6tetuta for dividing the district into elective tror a 3. Chapter 4b0 Water Authority • EsSentiaia.y the same as the merger. No withal.seel of infrastructure by city annematiOf. • Can be a retail or supply authority- - TWD Could either be pert of the authority for supply and distribution purposes Or Could be part of a supply authority *td atili retain its statue as a district with A *operate sleeted Rnird, etc. and retail water. • Continued eaiatenc;e cZ TWD probably not possible as the Boundary Commiatior: will prrbab1y inaist that the District be merged into the water auLhvrity. p: npi asQsarica * vs,TnT7 : 17n fie •P. n •l. z PORTLAND POWER ID :5032865450 DEC 03'93 10 :43 No .003 P 0�5) (7,4r:14, /f 2,/-"tif 4r4ad 4 .44 ,e011 `4C ic 760‘444- ,76- r tero#; /. &crwc1- �!1 q;;Ifit9- a, 1G�ftQ- ev'rmj14" /kr 9:crri )44,8 / ` _AA/724r 443,vvvrs- -- ' c,7-tgA.-.1— &/-44Air /ice 1-eifovi,341 4,14 /11 ,„evtAi-la 1/. 4204,t, • f + r iffeA;(- pfAldi _/°7-171/72Y 414- eir,4024d elltaire" •IA rtyPt er 9-11/7P-:: 4014,r 424444_ 4en....eciz ed,:t a ,4 ' -� - - C.,itexJ ei-.1‘L fr PORTLAND POWER ID :5032865450 DEC 03'93 10 :43 No .00(3 P .06-44""AleiWa (va 0/44;f4a 41,vvene4d,f4,1/ )(44i fad, ,to 4 ,,reh.,4_4_, 6,100v-,t, /fa aeree-htiud- 44-0 .)2xt744-1, a/ 7201A-,terYTA-44'vc''2 „61,Aticm .5te. ,73 dedi_ 0,f _eci, ,IL,112t ofA, enr../0,71e, . 1;,,,In4tAxefrit;_a rf4144,t,t-C414~14.r- 4)t-' 74• r r‘1,1 �y} i PAY- 34,crre. Athit, &-tr'1 40- arp-ru'l.A4-1•144%4 rr4- Alole /e'e 1 ' of ::Cri - 56-4/17 P/11 ,-)^1 - /(1: 7+4e1 ,/4 4.111ted ZPAL ,~A-0,441 A(4- &wed ,Zeia- 0.1, T;r1 eta, ?).4A 671, R . e4telw‘fttA- ri(a segAi4-4 )(i.c_ pal zte;, , -/ez-i-earo/C4. evi44t ALO A v: Lv-~r PORTLAND POWER ID :5032865450 DEC 03 '93 10 :44 No .003 P .07 4eAra vr 49otie . 4 ci / ?3) 444— —e-Ltqtr/Ykl- " roy r 1 •��h�E70113,vr 1 PORTLAND POWER ID :5032065450 DLL 06 '96 10 :44 No .UU.> r .0 rra-c-e4it (r 0.2-Avi'r 4,81.,h0/4- Ate/ 4 „„.m.,It f ° t f gg4 -j r �B;& ►BOG N , Z6 NW 3 ortikek ,iLT;40. a ;6/Lb 2.-10,1-4-147/ "a-ell/I:007 4 (11,4104:624JAL' „etiln,m Ai:t,64( ;fit `:,YA., £r- ,,yrti [t) .;/G .aA ziy, aw4j 2C /rn,44,, aciortztt m,e,f4 CJa- ervax4clif ' r ! j, f r r � , sz_4 (—I a-iPafie 4)2,1,1/r yte Azie4 4"evenui4. Sv144 e4�c ,c4-4 fei,r,24d- frytlii,yr 17)4tevrt o1, p— 4ce,rvtt,t,;,r. J 94'44 ''..?')--"Lo InterOffice Memo To: Jeri L. Chenelllee, dministrative Director From: Michael Miller "Senior Management Analyst g Y Date: May 25, 1993 Subject: Future water supply for TWD In response to Bob Santee's comments regarding the water supply options of the Tigard Water District, I would like to shed some factual information on this subject. This information is also contained in the 1990 Water Supply&Water Distribution Study for the Tigard Water District by Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. and my June 30, 1992 memo regarding the construction of the 24-inch Transmission main under Hwy. 217. The Portland Connection Currently Portland has 6 to 8 MGD (million gallons per day) available at our connection with them at Bradley Corner(SW Greenburg Road and SW Hall Blvd.). Through the existing facilities, the Water District has been able to receive water from this point of connection at a rate of 5,600 gpm. If the Water District were to utilize this amount of flow for a 24 hour period, we would receive 8.06 MGD. What this is stating is that even if the Water District had an additional 24-inch main, (from just south of Hwy. 217 to Bradley Corner) installed and operational, the District would not be able to import any more water from that connection. The water main from the connection at Bradley Corner to Portland is just not big enough. Because the water at Bradley Corner originates from Portland's Burlingame Reservoir Towers near Wilson High School, Portland has recommended that we install a 30-inch water main from those reservoirs to Bradley Corner. Currently the Burlingame reservoirs are filled by the Carolina and Fulton Pumping Stations, which have a combined pumping capacity of 32.4 MGD. According to Portland Water Bureau's data, only 11.4 MGD capacity is currently being utilized. This means that Portland does have the pumping capacity in place, if they have the water available. It is important to restate that additional water cannot be delivered to the Bradley Corner connection until such time that the 30-inch transmission main is installed. It is estimated that if the Water District were to partake in such a venture, it would cost the Water District $5,000,000. This figure is only for the 30-inch transmission main and does not include any internal improvements to the Water District's system, namely the 24-inch transmission main and bores under Hwy. 217 along SW Greenburg Road. Nor does the $5,000,000 buy the Water District part ownership in the Portland system. Even though the Water District were to pay for the 30-inch water main, Portland would retain ownership of that line. Future water supply for TWD 05/25/93 Page 2 One other historical item about our Portland connection: In 1973, 7,000 feet of 24-inch water main (from SW Garden Home Road and Oleson Road to Bradley Corner) was financed by Tigard Water District, Metzger Water District, the Winmar Corporation (Washington Square), and the City of Beaverton, but the title to the entire line from Burlingame is held by Portland. The Water District contributed $30,000 toward the $175,000 total for the 7,000 feet of 24-inch water line. The total projected need was 15 MGD, with the Water District's share being 3.65 MGD. Water Cost from Portland Another area of concern with water from Portland is the cost. The water costs from the City of Portland are based on how the Water District takes Bull Run water over the course of the last fiscal year. Portland uses a scale that considers exactly when the Water District took the water, whether or not it was a peak day (a peak day is when the outdoor temperature reaches—85 degrees F. and 200 MG passes through the headworks), peak hour (3:00 PM to 9:00 PM), or a combination peak day/peak hour. During the 92-93 fiscal year, Portland's rates increased from $1.535 to $3.23 per 100 cubic feet, a 110% increase. However, because of the water restrictions last summer, the Water District did not purchase any Bull Run water. This resulted in the water costs from Portland to be reduced to $1.767 per 100 cubic feet for this coming fiscal year. Because it appears that there will be no water restrictions from Portland this summer, our purchases of Bull Run water will increase and the resulting effect will likely be that our costs to purchase this water during the 94-95 fiscal year will also increase. The Lake Oswego Connection For many years the Water District has been actively pursuing a firm commitment from the City of Lake Oswego to either become part owners of their Water Treatment Plant or to have a guaranteed supply of water. Since Lake Oswego is not interested in selling part of their plant to the Water District, the latter has been the Board's direction for the District. The Water District has been actively pursuing both Portland and Lake Oswego to receive the best value for its dollar. In 1991, the Water District completed the paralleling of the 16-inch water main with a 24-inch transmission main for Lake Oswego water from the Bonita Pump Station to SW Gaarde Street and Pacific Hwy. With our transmission lines in place to Lake Oswego, the Water District will be able to receive a 16.9 MGD peak flow. Of course, in order to distribute this flow within the Water District, we will need to construct a new 9.0 MGD pump station at the District's Bonita Road site, and Lake Oswego will need to expand their Water Treatment Plant. Lake Oswego Treatment Plant Future water supply for TWD 05/25/93 Page 3 It was only two years ago that Lake Oswego's Water Treatment Plant could only supply 14.4 MGD. Last year Lake Oswego took the first step to correct this situation and cleaned the transmission line from the plant to Lake Oswego, thus enabling them to increase the amount of water delivered to the City. This spring (1993) the Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant has been able to increase its throughput to 18 MGD by pigging (cleaning) the raw water lines under the Willamette River and by rebuilding one of the intake pumps. Operating at this level is within the design capacity of the intake and raw water transmission line. In addition, Lake Oswego and the Clackamas Water District are working together on a pilot project on the Clackamas River to see if a new technology in filter media and techniques will be able to increase the capacity of the filter plants without the expense of building new filtration facilities. With this new technology, Lake Oswego believes that it should be able to increase the existing Water Treatment Plant production by 20-35%. This means that the Water Treatment Plant could be producing as much as 24.3 MGD for a minimum amount of money. I would like to point out a rather significant fact, and that is that the existing transmission line from the Water Treatment Plant to Lake Oswego is at design capacity. In other words no matter how much more water can be produced at the Water Treatment Plant, it cannot be carried through the existing transmission main to Lake Oswego. This is the main reason why it is so important to have the new 36-inch transmission main in place and operational within the near future. Also, the 36-inch transmission main will allow Lake Oswego to import water from South Fork Water Board through their connection with West Linn to help supply our summer peak demands. The estimated yield of this connection is 3-5 MGD. With Lake Oswego allowing the Water District to participate financially in the costs of constructing the 36-inch transmission main, we are in a way, developing the partnership that the Water District has been after all along. This partnership does come with a price, however. Lake Oswego Capital Improvement Program I have attached the Capital Improvement Program list necessary for Lake Oswego to provide water for both themselves and Tigard Water District, and the Capital Improvement Program for Lake Oswego only, to show the associated costs involved. Each of the projects have been prioritized by Lake Oswego as to the order in which they should be accomplished. These projects are about the same except that the projects for Lake Oswego are a scaled down version to serve only Lake Oswego's needs. Within the next 10 to 15 years Lake Oswego will need to spend $8,665,614 to construct these projects to meet their own needs. These same types of projects will cost $30,730,489 if they are expanded to meet the needs of the Water District and Lake Oswego. If you subtract the costs that Lake Oswego would incur on their own from the costs associated with expanding their facilities to accommodate the Water District's demand, the Water Districts share would be $22,064,875. This is approximately the same Future water supply for TWD 05/25/93 Page 4 amount of money that was reported by Engineer Gil Meigs in the 1990 Water Supply and Distribution Study. Alternate Water Sources When we look at the four supply alternatives that were discussed in the 1990 Water Supply and Distribution Study, we find the following facts: Alternate Source Total Cost Levelized Annual Costs City of Lake Oswego $21,432,000 $1.158/ccf City of Portland $5,667,000 $1.098/ccf Joint Water Commission $37,860,000 $1.723/ccf Willamette River $29,690,000 $1.683/ccf Even if the Water District were to go with the lowest cost source option, that being with the City of Portland, the levelized annual costs over 20 years is not that much less expensive than that of Lake Oswego. Also, the Water District will never have a guaranteed supply with Portland as it would with the City of Lake Oswego. And, as we saw last summer during the water restriction, Portland does not have a reliable source of water for all of their customers. Of all the alternate sources listed above, Portland is the only water source that is not filtered. This explains why the levelized costs to purchase Portland water is the most inexpensive; however, this price will not last long. It is expected that Portland will be required to build a filter plant in the future. They have already had several violations of federal law on this issue. In addition, Portland's well field is not a reliable source of water. DEQ and EPA regulations have shut down the well field, and tests are tracking the nearby contamination plume. Portland is hopeful of getting approval to use at least a portion of the wells this summer, but as recently as a month ago, a Portland representative told us the supply of summer water for us would depend on whether or not they got approval to use their wells. This is a very shaky source. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR LAKE OSWEGO ONLY Proiect date Est. Cost A. 12,000 L.F. of 24-inch pipe from Lake Oswego 2004 $1,480,781 Water Treatment Plant to Pacific Hwy. and Laurel St. B. There is no corresponding project for Lake Oswego C. 13,600 L.F. of 24-inch pipe from the existing 2004 $2,919,434 Clackamas River Intake& Pump Station to Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant D. Water Treatment Plant high service pumps 2004 $1,011,060 4 - 600 hp @ 4730 gpm each E. Clackamas River Intake pump station 2004 $410,743 3 - 300 hp @ 4860 gpm each F. Expand existing Water Treatment Plant to 2003 $2,843,605 20 MGD capacity Total Expense 58.665.614 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR LAKE OSWEGO AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Proiect date Est. Cost A. 12,000 L.F. of 36-inch pipe from Lake Oswego 1992 $2,925,300 Water Treatment Plant to Pacific Hwy. and Laurel St. B. 6,100 L.F. of 30-inch pipe from State St. to 2004 $931,017 Iron Mtn. Blvd. and Fairway Rd. C. 13,600 L.F. of 30-inch pipe from the existing 1993 $3,427,070 Clackamas River Intake&Pump Station to Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant D l.Water Treatment Plant high service pumps 1994 $1,989,470 4 - 800 hp pumps @ 6370 gpm each D2.4000 L.F. of 16-inch pipe from new Willamette 2006 $506,583 River Intake and pump station to existing WTP D3.Water Treatment Plant high service pumps 2000 $312,797 1 - 800 hp pump @ 6370 gpm E1.New Clackamas River Intake and pump station 1992 $1,284,888 3 - 300 hp pumps @ 4860 gpm each E2.Existing Clackamas River Intake pump station 1996 $170,616 3 - 200 hp pumps @ 3910 gpm each E3.New Clackamas River Intake pump station 2001 $136,914 1 - 300 hp pump @ 4380 gpm Fl.Expand existing Water Treatment Plant to 1993-94 $10,020,022 32 MGD capacity F2.New 5 MGD Willamette River Intake and Pump 2006 $958,400 Station F3.New 5 MGD Willamette River WTP 2005 $8,067,412 Total Expense $30.730.489 /444k4t4404b. ,------ t;,...,,;s, *s Vis. , t.' 'e t 1 3 r / /; i e !"` ��r. \k., --..a Fes® J iAct . ✓ L '!' ''''. .-::4ril.' '' '' 0'0 .Afjf, 0-J- _,., A ,„A citf.,(L/1--d j 0 f, 0 ( .5 1 1 � ' ty[511,(1 "' 93 ..,, Y )ri'' d•-,k101.- VIC-VA Vli 1- V N- 0 i )iY 1 key A "(� s'a X1 6 Iced -1(, �. stkta � co A NI 11071' at .jt . tes- :Alt\C is SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON COUNTY JOINT WATER AGENCY 8777 SW Burnham St. P 0 Box 230000 Tigard, OR 97281-1999 639-1554 InterOffice Memo To: Joint Water Agency Chair and Board Membe s From: John A. Buol, Interim Manager Date: November 19, 1993 Subject: Meeting with City of Tualatin On Tuesday, November 16, 1993, the Joint Water Agency staff and Tigard City Administrator, Patrick Reilly, had a meeting with the City of Tualatin. The representatives from Tualatin were Steve Rhodes, City Manager and Mike McKillip, City Engineer. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss with Tualatin the possibility of a connection with Tualatin at Bonita Road and 72nd for short term water supply. The City of Tualatin reviewed their water needs and informed the group they recently signed an agreement with Sherwood to supply them with their water needs. Steve Rhodes stated that Tualatin was willing to work with the JWA in developing an agreement to supply short term water to the Agency subject to the City of Portland's approval. The meeting was adjourned with the suggestion JWA develop needs on how much water the Agency will need plus develop a proposed agreement for discussion purposes. Mr. Rhodes stated he will also have to get approval from the Tualatin City Council. i SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON COUNTY JOINT WATER AGENCY 8777 SW Burnham St. P 0 Box 230000 Tigard, OR 97281-1999 639-1554 InterOffice Memo To: Joint Water Agency Chair and Board Members From: John A. Buol, Interim Manager Date: December 2, 1993 Subject: Phase 2 Regional Water Supply Plan Project Participants Committee On Tuesday, November 23, 1993, the Participants Committee held their monthly meeting. Attached are copies of the Progress Report from Project Manager, Lorna Stickel; October 1993 Meeting Minutes; Steering Committee Minutes of November 3, 1993, and a Report on the Screening of Conservation Measures prepared by Barney and Worth. Also presented was a report on the Aquifer Storage and Recovery Siting. They will study storage of 20m gallons or more and one of these sites is near Cooper Mountain. The Public Involvement Report by Barney&Worth will survey 900 people in the Portland area on water and water conservation. Also the Metro WRPAC group has hired CH2M Hill to review water needs of the three concepts proposed by the 2040 study. This review will look at the concepts being served by water if approved. If you have any questions, give me a call. CC: King City Council } :.:.m-- EET.-..IN- •.:-. VIEETING AGENDA REGIONAL V ATER 'SUPP Y PLAN -- PHASE 2 PARTICIPANTS COTTEE : Tuesda �., :November 23, 1993 Y . 1:30 p.m. Meetng<Zocation• : Southeast Washington County Joint Water Agency 8777 S :W :Burnham Tigard; Oregon 1. Introductions :> - ----- •. 2 : rova ofOctober 26 x..993.Minutes . Progress;Re . Its ; a) Steering Committee:::= Tim Ercvert Pro`ect Staff= Lorna Stickel, P•ro ect Consu tant-,,,,re'"'''eam. Skip_`Schick, Barakat& Cbamberlin< J 4'. :.Re i ,>g.. ; y tem, fficienc & Transmission:-:Existing >Infrastructur..;:..„. e Report . i f . S- •Aquifer Storage:&Recovery:Siting Report R •T -. ,, -, -1 4q- -- 4 ii:fr/,..--=-3 6. Demand Manatgemen-.-u- .'Screening Analysis - Skip Schick 7>: Public6,ti n.S •--. Report Brad Higbee r� 1�(ti'' . .Yt 8. .Public Comment 6 ' ' f 9 Other Business ;Metra WRPAC Meeting > '/Qh 7 ' rC t k/ G / ,. .• ��' �L RECEIVED Iruv 1 3 1993 : . PARTICIPANTS COMMITTEE PORTLAND REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN PHASE 2 For more information contact: Lorna Stickel, 823-7502 Dominique Bessee, 823-7528 MEETING NOTICE November 23, 1993 The Participants Committee for the Portland Regional Water Supply Plan (made up of twenty-seven water provider entities), will hold a meeting on November 23, 1993 at 1 :30 p.m. at the Southeast Washington County Joint Water Agency, formerly the Tigard Water District, located at 8777 S.W. Burnham, in Tigard, Oregon. The meeting will include progress reports on the activities of the Steering Committee, consultant team, and project management staff for the Phase 2 project. The Participants Committee will specifically hear progress reports from the Project Manager and from the consultant team, with special items relating to, and assessment of, existing transmission and infrastructure,an initial site screening for Aquifer Storage and Recovery, a public attitude survey, and a screening analysis for demand side management options for the region. Other items as needed may be placed on the agenda. The Participants Committee is specifically set up by an Intergovernmental Agreement to manage and provide policy direction for the Phase 2 contract for the Portland Regional Water Supply Plan project. The meetings of the Participants Committee are open to the public. There will be a public comment period provided at this meeting, but the Committee may elect to limit the amount of time provided for each commentor. Please note that the December meeting of the Participants Committee will be on Tuesday, December 21, 1993. ACCOMMODATION OF PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS: In order to accommodate persons with physical impairments, please notify the Portland Water Bureau of any special physical or language accommodations you may need as far in advance of the meeting date as possible. To request these arrangements, please contact Dominique Bessee at 823-7528. For the hearing impaired, please call the City of Portland's general TDD at 823-6868 with attention to Dominique Bessee at the Portland Water Bureau. REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN -- PHASE 2 PARTICIPANTS COMMITTEE MEETING Minutes of October 26, 1993 The meeting was called to order at 1:35 p.m. at the Southeast Washington County Joint Water Agency by Vice Chair Alan Fletcher. Meeting participants were introduced. Those in attendance were Bob Rapp from Canby Utility Board; John Buol from Southeast Washington Council Joint Water Agency; John Thomas from Mt. Scott Water District; Denny Klingbile from Damascus Water; Gregory Drechsler from the City of Milwaukie; Tim Erwert and Van Burrus from the City of Hillsboro/Joint Water Commission; Duane Cline from the City of Lake Oswego; Mike McKillip from the City of Tualatin; Jerry Anderson from the City of Wood Village; Jim Galloway from the City of Troutdale; Carter Harrison from Clackamas Water District; John Burdett from the City of Forest Grove; Michael Baker from Rockwood Water; Vergie Ries from the City of Beaverton; Gail Adamson from Tualatin Valley Water District; Thomas Hoffman from Oak Lodge Water District; Roger Meyer from West Slope Water District; and Roberta Jortner and Bob Willis from the Portland Water Bureau; and Frank Gearhart from Citizens Interested in Bull Run. Members present from the project consultant team were Gary Fiske from Barakat & Chamberlin, and Brad Higbee from Barney & Worth. Approval of Minutes: The meeting minutes of September 28, 1993 were adopted as written. Progress Reports: Steerina Committee: Tim Erwert, Chair, reported that the Steering Committee continued its bimonthly meeting schedule during the month of September. Project consultants informed the Steering Committee that it would shortly begin to be inundated with technical memorandums to review, including analyses of the various supply sources and intake sitings. The Steering Committee instructed the Chair to invite water providers who own existing intakes on the Clackamas River, and Oak Lodge Water District, to assist in narrowing supply options with regard to existing and proposed facilities. This meeting is scheduled for November 1. The Steering Committee heard reports from the consultants on the status of the refinement of the demand forecast model, Metro's population data, the draft Water Quality Report, and Stakeholder Interview Report. The Steering Committee sent a letter to the Portland City Council on the Clinton Forest Plan. The committee urged the Council to take a strong position to "ensure the availability of the option to add storage in the Bull Run watershed to meet future regional water supply needs. " The draft SEIS could prohibit the consideration of additional storage on Bull Run. Mike McKillip asked if the Water Bureau also planned to submit comments on the plan. Roberta Jortner noted that the Portland resolution addressed more than additional storage, and extended to Participants Committee Meeting Minutes October 26, 1993 Page 2 issues surrounding management policies in the Bull Run watershed. The Water Bureau had to wait to hear City Council's position on the resolution before drafting comments on the Clinton Forest Plan. Once the resolution passed, the Bureau wrote a comment letter under the signature of the Portland Mayor to the Interagency SEIS Team. The Participants Committee talked about submitting a comment letter from themselves on the Clinton Forest Plan. John Thomas suggested that it would be appropriate for the letter to go out under the Vice Chair's signature. After some discussion by the committee, John Thomas motioned that comments go out under the signature of the Vice Chair. Tim Erwert seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Proiect Staff: Roberta Jortner explained that Lorna Stickel was unable to attend because she was participating in Metro's concurrent Water Resources Policy Advisory Committee (WRPAC) meeting. WRPAC called a special session to discuss the relationship between regional water issues and Metro's Regional 2040 Plan. Roberta reviewed activities outlined on the project staff's progress report. Project staff assisted in making presentations on Phase 2 to Metro's Planning Committee, and the Water Services Leadership Group. Project staff is working with the consultant team on the geotechnical and environmental analysis for siting a potential third dam in the Bull Run. Staff met with consultants to discuss the water availability analysis of the various sources, and development of the Integrated Resource Planning model. Project staff reviewed and commented on the draft Water Quality Report. The draft report was given to the Steering Committee, and may be distributed to the Participants Committee at the next meeting. Gary Fiske asked whether the EPA/Corps meeting on the NEPA EIS and federal permitting processes has been scheduled. Roberta indicated that the workshop is not yet scheduled but will occur sometime in mid- November. Alan Fletcher commented that many people are interested in the permitting process and suggested sending out meeting notification. Proiect Consultant Team: Gary Fiske reported that work has been done on design and data collection for the demand forecast model. Agency demand estimates were calculated for Tualatin Valley Water District and the City of Portland. Gary noted that demand projections have increased since Phase 1, and that the new mid-range forecast could be as high as the high-range forecast projected during Phase 1. The demand forecast model can now be calculated on a monthly basis, and can show more accurately monthly peaks and troughs. The consultants will continue to develop demand estimates for other agencies. The remaining demographic data isexpectedto arrive next week from Metro. The draft Water Quality Report was given to the Steering Committee last week. The technical memorandum evaluates the raw water quality Participants Committee Meeting Minutes October 26, 1993 Page 3 of each surface water source, and discusses the associated risks. Technical memorandums are also being prepared on water availability and Aquifer Storage and Recovery. Murray Smith & Associates is looking at water rights for each source and expects to complete their work in early November. Gary Fiske reported that the consultants will participate in the upcoming Regional Conservation Coordination Meeting to present results of the qualitative screening of the universe of conservation measures. The qualitative screen was inclusive, and only screened out very few measures clearly not workable for this region. The next step will be an economic screening. The consultant team is continuing work on the Integrated Resource Planning (IRP) model. Among the modeling software packages being considered is Stella II. Gary commented that Stella II is a powerful analytical tool that is also very visual and can be used to show public groups the integration process and how pieces of the regional plan fit together. Alan Fletcher asked whether Metro's forecasts were coming out for all areas. Gary indicated he would have demographic forecasts for each of the twelve agencies for which independent models are being developed. Alan Fletcher asked when the higher, mid-range numbers would be made available for each water provider. Gary Fiske responded that model estimates should be available within a couple of weeks after the numbers were delivered. Gary suggested that Lorna Stickel might request the numbers from Metro. Brad Higbee distributed one bound copy of the Stakeholder Interview Report to representatives of each participating entity. A copy of the document will be mailed to participants not represented at the meeting. Photocopies of the report are also available for review. The report distills comments heard during interviews with community leaders and stakeholders in the tri-county area. Brad mentioned that he heard repeated expressions of surprise and appreciation that the water providers were gathering to fund and manage the regional water supply planning effort. Brad noted that cost, environmental concerns, and quality of life issues were among the primary points repeatedly expressed during the interviews. Interviewees saw conservation as being a very important, and significant, part of the study, which should be in place before other supply measures are implemented. Interviewees generally saw advantages and disadvantages for each of the source option being reviewed. Brad invited anyone with questions on the report to contact him. Gary Fiske noted that the Stakeholder Report will be used to design the survey instrument, and also in fleshing out regional policy objectives. Participants Committee Meeting Minutes October 26, 1993 Page 4 IGA Amendment: Roberta Jortner explained that the IGA amendment language had been revised, and agreed upon, by legal counsel involved in rewriting the draft. After the new language was circulated to the Participants Committee, the Portland City Attorney's Office noticed a typo under the Shared Liability section. Roberta indicated that another version of the amendment language would be mailed to the committee as soon as possible. John Thomas expressed a desire to receive a summary of Phase 2 project activities for use in updating the committee's Boards and Councils, as the new amendment language is adopted. John also communicated his preference to receive more written information from the consultants on the status of work activities. Gary Fiske noted a fairly detailed task discussion was appended to the consultant's monthly billing, and suggested circulating this activity summary to the committee. Alan Fletcher said that while he did not believe the Participants Committee needed to review all Steering Committee working documents, he agreed that some dissemination of information was important. Alan suggested distributing copies of the summary during Participants Committee meetings to avoid mailing costs. The group agreed that this approach was adequate. Tom Hoffman said he was pleased to see the committee working as a group to revise the IGA amendment language. Public Comments: Frank Gearhart said Citizens Interested in Bull Run was encouraged to see the Participants Committee standing behind the Portland City Council's resolution. Frank expressed appreciation to the Participants Committee for evaluating the supply options in the interest of the whole community. Other Business: Gene Seibel, Mike Rosenberger, Alan Fletcher, and Lorna Stickel will make a Phase 2 presentation to the Strategic Water Management Group (SWMG) . The meeting will be held in Salem on the afternoon of November 2 , 1993. Phase 2 Participants are welcome to attend the meeting. Roberta Jortner will circulate a copy of the latest draft of the meeting agenda. Next Meeting Agenda: Roberta Jortner mentioned that Lorna Stickel had developed three letterhead concepts for the Phase 2 project. Roberta invited meeting participants to review 'the letterhead designs and rank their preferences. The next Participants Committee meeting will be held on Tuesday, •November 23rd, at 1:30 p.m. at Southeast Washington County Joint Water Agency. The meeting adjourned at 2 :35 p.m. Submitted by Dominique Bessee RECEIVED NOV 1 5 1993 :.. :.::;.,RING >>PORT AND`'ttEG ............SYJPPLY PLAN . . PHASE.,.2:: November 12, 1993 Dear Interested Party: Enclosed are the minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on November 3, 1993. The committee will meet next on Wednesday, November 17, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. in the Portland Building. If you have any questions, please call me at 823-7528. Sincerely, Dominique Bessee Portland Water Bureau Administrative Assistant REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN -- PHASE 2 STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Minutes of November 3, 1993 The Regional Water Supply Plan - Phase 2 Steering Committee met on Wednesday, November 3, 1993, at 1:30 p.m. in the 6th floor conference room of the City of Portland Water Bureau. Those in attendance were: Gary Wohlgemuth, Montgomery Watson Greg DiLoreto, City of Gresham Gene Seibel, Tualatin Valley Water District Duane E. Robinson, Rockwood Water PUD Carter Harrison, Clackamas Water District Skip Schick, Barakat & Chamberlin, Inc. Gary Fiske, Barakat & Chamberlin, Inc. Brad Higbee, Barney & Worth Van Burrus, Hillsboro/JWC Tim Erwert, Hillsboro/JWC Mike Rosenberger, Portland Water Bureau Lorna Stickel, Portland Water Bureau Roberta Jortner, Portland Water Bureau The meeting was called to order by Chairman Tim Erwert. The minutes of the October 20, 1993 meeting were reviewed. Gene Seibel noted the time of the meeting was 1:30 instead of noon as stated. It was moved and seconded that the minutes be approved as corrected. Lorna Stickel gave a progress report on items of interest. 1. The final IGA amendment language was sent out for approval last week after a minor one-word change. Providers are urged to seek approval by January 1994. 2. While the Participants Committee met last week, Lorna and some of the Participants were meeting with the Metro staff to discuss Region 2040 growth concepts and the relationship to water. Metro has hired ECO NW (as the subcontractor) to provide the descriptive indicators for the concepts. ECO NW is subcontracting with CH2M Hill to collect water and sewer information. Metro expressed interest in differences in water demand relative to different densities and urban form. Questions about Concept B, land use patterns, single family dwellings, peak water demands, and cost issues for distribution to satellite cities that are not participants (like North Plains and Scappoose) were discussed at length. Rosemary Furfey of Metro is the contact person to follow up with. Metro expressed interest in being more involved in Phase 2. Metro could attend such meetings as ETF (Environmental Task Force). The Metro Council would like to have a council member involved in the Water Service Steering Committee Meeting Minutes of November 3, 1993 Page 2 Leadership Group. Carter Harrison asked whether CH2M Hill is developing another water plan. Lorna encouraged the RWSP Steering Committee to review a draft of the Metro work plan and the CH2M Hill contract. Skip Schick noted that BCI had redone the demand forecasts from the Phase 1 work and that the use of Phase 1 forecasts would be inconsistent with Phase 2 work. Metro should have their concepts in writing by May, 1994. The base case is different from the 3 concepts. There needs to be a description for alternative demand prospects. Gene Seibel noted that we should be involved with Metro in their planning. We need more mutual cooperation in the future. When we need data such as maps from Metro, there should not be a charge. Metro maps cost between $200 - $300. Duane Robinson complimented Ms. Stickel on her interaction with Metro. Mike Rosenberger also received a letter from Metro praising her. Ms. Stickel gave a brief summary of the Strategic Water Management Group Meeting which she, Gene Siebel , Alan Fletcher, and Roberta Jortner attended. Fred Hanson, Director of DEQ, had asked Commissioner Lindberg about the effects of the Clinton Forest Plan on a third dam for the Bull Run watershed. He also expressed an interest in how Phase 2 was looking at relationships between land use, urban form, and water demand forecasts. Ann Squier (of the Governor's office) asked whether Phase 2 was examining rate controls. She was told that the plan would look into pricing options. Ms. Stickel passed around a sample of the letterhead for Regional Water Supply Plan - Phase 2. Gary Fiske had suggested the placement of the logo. He mentioned that it would be faster and less costly to have blank envelopes with a return address label sticker or stamp rather than printed ones. Gary Fiske also said Barakat & Chamberlin would cover the postage for the Contingent Valuation Survey. Gary Fiske commented on the Project Consultant Team data collection process. The difficulty in gathering of all the demographic data is holding up progress. Lorna will be talking with Metro to try and obtain data for agencies other than Portland and Tualatin Valley Water District. The integrated resources planning (IRP) modeling work is continuing. A discussion was held with Dr. Richard Palmer, University of Washington, who is an expert on using STELLA for water resource problems and may advise us on an on-going basis. A meeting with Dr. Palmer has been scheduled for November 18, 1993. There will be a meeting next week with Murray Smith on the relationship of transmission to the IRP modeling process. Gary introduced Skip Schick to report on the Demand Management and Conservation Element. Brad Higbee was to report on the public involvement and stakeholder report. Steering Committee Meeting Minutes of November 3, 1993 Page 3 Garry Wohlgemuth was to report on Source Options work and meeting of Clackamas providers. Skip Schick presented as handout information on a list of demand management measures and initial qualitative screening --- 113 measures were identified applicable to single, multi-family, commercial and industrial water uses. 23 measures were screened out leaving 90 measures that passed the screening. The feedback received was screened against qualitative factors (page 2 of handout) . Criteria include better measures available, technological market maturity, poor utility match, and customer acceptance. Customer acceptance is also a big part of the screening such as artificial surfaces (does not include landscaping), environmental and health concerns. Gray water systems were screened out initially because as of yet it is not included in the plumbing codes --- backflows and testing are still required. Residential soil sensors/automatic sprinklers could possibly increase water use. These measures were kept on the list after receiving feedback from the Regional Conservation Committee. There is a California study about watering yards automatically but it may not be applicable for Portland. We should find out what's happening with Seattle. Gene Seibel said that he thought there was potential for water savings from use of soil sensors and automated irrigation on football fields and other institutional uses. Peaking could be reduced. Skip invited the Steering Committee to give their comments on the universe of measures and qualitative up to the next Steering Committee meeting. It will take one month to put together the economic screening. Attention to screening values for the demand side measures is needed. There are questions as to what are legitimate values. We should be on the high side to stay inclusive. Phase 2 resources have appropriate value. Gary Fiske said for the economic screen we need a marginal cost figure, on the high side (an artificial number) to compare with the costs of conservation programs. Tim Erwert noted that we may see a natural breakpoint in projected marginal costs. We don't want to set the value too low. High energy costs could be used to help screen the measures. More discussion will take place at the next RWSP Steering Committee meeting. Brad Higbee will be attending the Regional Conservation Committee meeting in December to discuss the public involvement plan. He has also scheduled the first meeting of the ETF for November 16. Input from the ETF is needed to analyze the Bull Run Reservoir before the snows arrive. Regarding the Stakeholder Interview Report (penultimate draft) , there were no comments so the final was distributed and mailed to the Participants Committee. Copies were passed around to the Steering Committee members. It includes a summary of the Phase 2 process and 83 interviews with community leaders and stakeholders in the tri-county area. It is a valuable feedback tool for future planning. Cost and environmental impact and quality of life issues were most prevalent issues mentioned in the interviews. Conservation was also important. People had very different opinions on potential water savings (10-45% in the long range and 5-10% in the short range) . Raw quality of water is a concern. Also, governance issues. The consensus seemed to be that it won't be Metro. Steering Committee Meeting Minutes of November 3, 1993 Page 4 Garry Wohlgemuth reported on 11/1/93 meeting of Clackamas water suppliers including Clackamas Water District, South Fork Water District, Lake Oswego and Oak Lodge. There was a brief description of the development of the Clackamas intake site, treatment and distribution options. There are plans for expansion of the South Fork intake facility/treatment plant and a new Oak Lodge treatment facility which are now in the permit stage. The providers were asked whether they had major concerns regarding the consideration of an option to consolidate facilities on the Clackamas. They were also asked to provide input on expansion of existing facilities. Greg DiLoreto mentioned there are six drafted alternatives --- one is consolidation. Lorna Stickel said they are also considering sources from other sub regions for the Clackamas area as well . Tim noted that other Clackamas area providers expressed concern about not being involved in this discussion. Garry noted that the meeting was not meant to exclude anyone but rather to begin gathering data. Gene Seibel asked how the proposed intake and treatment at Oak Lodge should be consolidated and expressed concern about public perception toward individual entities going off on their own. Garry Wohlgemuth agreed that for Oak Lodge the increment of supply is small and that the team has considered what the impacts on the scenarios would be with and without new Oak Lodge facilities. The demand could be absorbed into consolidated facilities if that option were selected. Lorna Stickel said that treatment and water quality tasks will consider intake issues (including Oak Lodge) . At the December RWSP Steering Committee meeting, findings on treatment alternatives. The committee agreed that public's perception of a regional focus is important. The Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) siting memo is to be drafted and submitted to Lorna Stickel for review. There are three locations to be evaluated --- one is the site currently being studied in Washington County. This report should be available for the Steering Committee prior to the next meeting. The desktop environmental analysis for the Bull Run Dam 3 siting memo is finalized. Drilling work will be proceeding shortly at the recommended site. The Water Quality Report was distributed and some comments from the Steering Committee were received. The Portland Water Bureau will be forwarding comments to Garry Wohlgemuth in about ten days. Lorna Stickel mentioned the Environmental Protection Agency/Corps coordination meeting is scheduled for November 16. The first meeting of the Environmental • Steering Committee Meeting Minutes of November 3, 1993 Page 5 Task Force will be on the same day from 9:00 a.m. and noon. Both meetings will be held at the PacWest Center, 1211 SW 5th, Conference Room B, 27th floor. The Project Management Staff and consultants will be there. Members of the RWSP Steering Committee to attend include Dale Jutila, Gene Seibel , and Alan Fletcher. Tim Erwert asked for other business. Mike Rosenberger reported on his and Commissioner Lindberg's trip to Washington, D.C. to brief Congresswoman Elizabeth Furse, Congressman Ron Wyden, and Phil Stell on the draft of President Clinton's forest plan. They also discussed PL25-200. We have a two-track strategy: 1) Administrative (White House, U.S. Forest Service) and 2) Legislative (Wyden and Furse may introduce a bill to enact the City Council 's resolution) . Per The Oregonian, 83,000 comments were received on the forest plan. There is a time extension of three months on finalization of the plan so there is time to work on these activities. There was a Safe Drinking Water Act Reauthorization bill introduced by Reps. Slatterly and Bliley in the House. It had 28 co-signers very shortly after introduction. Tim Erwert discussed upcoming holidays in relation to the RWSP Steering Committee meetings on December 1st and 15th. It was decided that both of these meetings are necessary. There is a Participants Committee meeting December 28th that should be changed to December 21st. This was approved by the Steering Committee members and a notice will be sent on the date change. Gene Seibel asked the consultants if they felt working with the Regional Conservation Committee was helpful . Skip responded that it was providing useful information in the committee members' areas of expertise and that they were developing some "ownership" of the Phase 2 project which should benefit the providers in the long run. Tim Erwert adjourned the meeting. Respectfully submitted, Janet Kessler r . + DRAFT Portland Regional Water Supply Plan - Phase 2 Screening of Conservation Measures We have developed a comprehensive list of candidate conservation measures and have conducted a qualitative screen to eliminate those measures which are clearly inappropriate for the region. Measures with quantifiable costs and savings which pass the qualitative screen will be subjected to the economic screen. Measures that have non-quantifiable costs and savings, but are retained for customized application, will not be evaluated in the economic screen. Instead, they are passed along to the bundling step. We are commencing work on the economic screen; this document summarizes the results of the qualitative screen. Universe of Conservation Measures As a first task to developing conservation programs, we have developed a comprehensive list of conservation measures'. The list of measures was developed from the literature, project reports from other water utilities, and in-house knowledge and experience with conservation program planning and implementation. This universe of conservation measures is presented in Attachment 1. Qualitative Screen To facilitate the screening process, we combined industrial conservation measures which target similar end-uses. For example, measures aimed at reducing cooling tower water use, such as drift eliminators, conductivity meters for blow-down control, are combined and screened as a single measure - cooling tower modifications. The shortened list of measures is then passed through a qualitative screen designed to: • Identify any specific factors or criteria that would limit the applicability of measures in the region; and • Eliminate only those measures that are clearly inappropriate for the goals and conditions of the regional suppliers. The qualitative screen applies of a series of criteria designed to eliminate measures from consideration, as follows: In the context of this study, we make a distinction between conservation measures and programs. We use the term "measure" to denote conservation devices (e.g. water efficient plumbing fixtures) or practices (e.g. turf reduction). "Programs" are bundles of measures which pass the qualitative and economic screens. These measures are bundled for delivery to the target customer groups. 1 • Better measure available: There is another, clearly more appropriate, measure that addresses a specific inefficiency in water use. For example, showerhead flow restrictors were screened out in favor of low-flow showerheads because low-flow showerheads perform better and are better- accepted by consumers. • Technological/market maturity: The technology is either not commercially available and/or not supported by the necessary service industry. For example, Swedish 1-quart flush toilets were screened out because they are not yet commercially available in the United States. Similarly, ultrasonic dishwashers were screened out because there are few manufacturers in this country, and the technology has not been adequately tested for commercial application. • Poor utility match: The technology is not applicable to the climate, building stock, or equipment that is typical in the service territory. Alternatively, the measures may be not be feasible for the utilities to administer because their application is limited. For example, swimming pool covers for residential application have been eliminated from further consideration because of the negligible number of residential pools in the region. For example, water-efficient medical and laboratory equipments were eliminated because of their limited applicability. • Poor customer acceptance: Customers will be unwilling to implement the measure to the extent that penetration rates will be unacceptably low and/or customer incentives will have to be too costly. For example, all weather artificial surfaces were eliminated because they may be aesthetically unacceptable to customers. • Environmental and health concerns: The measure raises unacceptable concerns regarding health, safety, or environmental impacts. For example, greywater systems for commercial/industrial application were screened out because potential health and safety problems. The costs and impacts of some measures cannot be quantified to support a detailed economic evaluation. However, these measures are retained for customized application. These measures will not be screened in the economic screen. Rather, they will be evaluated after they have been bundled into conservation programs. Industrial conservation measures are examples of measures with "non-quantifiable savings". The results of the qualitative screen are shown in Attachment 2. 2 Attachment 1 REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN - PHASE 2 UNIVERSE OF WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES End Use Conservation Measure Customer Class Shower Low-flow showerheads (2.75 GPM) SFR, MFR, COM Ultra-low flow showerheads (1.9 GPM) SFR, MFR, COM Shower flow restrictors SFR, MFR, COM Faucets Low-flow faucets SFR, MFR, COM, IND, GVT Low-flow faucet aerators SFR, MFR, COM, IND, GVT Toilets Gravity-flow tank-type ULFT SFR, MFR, COM Pressurized tank type ULFT SFR, MFR, COM < 1 GPF ULFT SFR, MFR, COM Toilet Retrofit Displacement bags SFR, MFR, COM Displacement bottles SFR, MFR, COM Displacement dams SFR, MFR, COM Dual-flush adapters SFR, MFR, COM Fill cycle regulators SFR, MFR, COM Early closure flappers SFR, MFR, COM Leaks - Faucet Faucet washers SFR, MFR, COM Leaks - Toilet Flapper valves SFR, MFR, COM Fill valves SFR, MFR, COM Leak detection tablets SFR, MFR, COM Washers Lower volume vertical axis SFR, MFR Horizontal axis machines SFR, MFR Dishwashers Lower volume dishwashers SFR, MFR Residential Misc. Replace self-regenerating water softeners SFR, MFR Point-of-use water heaters SFR, MFR measure 1.lis 1 Water Conservation Measures Residential Misc. Individual dwelling unit sub-meters MFR Separate irrigation sub-meters MFR, COM, IND, IRR, GVT Metering all accounts SFR, MFR, COM, IND, IRR, GVT Water pressure regulator SFR, MFR Residential Outdoor Hose control nozzles SFR, MFR Garden hose timers SFR, MFR Drip irrigation system SFR, MFR Bubbler/soaker irrigation system SFR, MFR Automatic sprinkler system SFR, MFR Soil sensors SFR, MFR Rain sensors SFR, MFR Water efficient plant material SFR, MFR Xeriscaping SFR, MFR Turf replacement/reduction SFR, MFR Irrigation scheduling SFR, MFR Soil preparation/mulching SFR, MFR Graywater systems SFR, MFR Rainwater collector/cistern SFR, MFR Swimming pool covers SFR, MFR Commercial toilets Commercial ULFT COM, IND, GVT ULFT valve replacement COM, IND Ultra-low flush urinals COM, IND, GVT Ultra-low flush urinal valve replacement COM, IND, GVT Infra-red activated flushing COM, IND, GVT Commercial faucets Pressure closing COM, IND, GVT Spring loaded COM, IND, GVT Infra-red activated COM, IND, GVT Ultrasonic activated COM, IND, GVT Foot operated COM, IND, GVT Commercial Misc. Point-of-use water heaters COM, IND, GVT Recirculating hot water systems COM, IND, GVT Swimming pool covers COM, GVT Centralized regeneration water softeners COM, GVT Meter-controlled flushing water softeners COM, GVT measure1.lis 2 Water Conservation Measures Commercial washers Efficient machines (laundromat capacity) COM, GVT Batch washers COM, GVT Tunnel washers COM, GVT Rinse water reclaim systems COM, GVT Car washes Low volume car washes COM, GVT Recirculating/counter-current car washes COM, GVT Air-cooled machinery Air conditioners (HVAC) COM, GVT Chillers COM, GVT Pumps COM, GVT Compressors COM, GVT Ice-makers COM, GVT Cold-water drinking fountains COM, GVT Medical equipment GVT (sterilizers, X-ray equipment, etc.) Laboratory equipment GVT (pumps, deionizers, etc.) Food handling Counter-current dishwashers COM, GVT Chemical sanitizer dishwashers COM, GVT Conveyor dishwashers COM, GVT Ultrasound dishwashers COM, GVT Dishwasher water reuse systems COM, GVT Warming tables with dry heat COM, GVT Garbage disposers using recycled water COM, GVT Off-site garbage disposal COM, GVT Heat exchangers/ Closed loop COM, GVT boilers Steam condensate return systems COM, IND, GVT Cooling towers modifications COM,IND, GVT Drift eliminators Connections to alternative makeup sources Conductivity meters for blow-down control Flow meters on make-up and blow-down valves Fixed ppm discharge minimum requirements Eliminate/replace all single-pass cooling systems measure1.lis 3 Water Conservation Measures Cooling towers Process changes to reach higher cooling tower of concentration (from standard 1-2 to 6 or more) - Ozonation systems- - Acid treatment systems - Ion exchange systems - Lime softening systems - Sidestream filtration systems - Magnetic attraction systems - Electrostatic field generator systems Evaporative cooler Reroute and reuse blow down COM, IND, GVT Thermostat controllers COM, IND, GVT Solenoid and other automatic valves for water flow control IND Timer controls/delay switches Mechanical motion-sensors Electronic motion sensors Float valves on make-up reservoirs Conductivity probes Temperature probes Master off-hour control valves Industrial washers and rinsers (least efficient - continuous running bath rinsers) IND Quick-dump rinsers with timers or conductivity probes Counter current washers and rinsers Spray rinsing systems Air knives Drag-out elimination stages Return drains High pressure/low volume spray nozzles IND Conveyor systems Washers and rinsers Warmers Chillers Closed system/batch dump chillers/warmers IND measure1.lis 4 Water Conservation Measures On-site water reclamation/treatment systems IND Ultrafiltration Activated carbon filtration Ion exchange processes Reverse osmosis Vapor compression evaporation Deionized water reclaim loops Graywater: use reclaimed/treated process water in a lower quality process or non- process use (includes required dual-plumbing modifications) IND Cooling tower makeup systems Landscape irrigation systems Dust control systems Cleaning systems Once-through cooling systems Toilet flushing systems Fume/gas scrubbing systems Quenching systems Waste stream separation to facilitate process water reclamation IND Separation of sanitary water stream and process water stream Segregation of toxic from non-toxic constituent streams Sewer bypass connections between point of discharge and point of reuse Facilities for temporary storage of process water Custom industrial process operations (varies by industry) IND Lower volume soap and water conveyor belt lubrication systems Lower volume bottle washer and rinser systems Dyebath recirculation systems High-pressure/ low-volume cleaning equipment Building Outdoor Sub-meter for irrigation COM, IND, GVT Large landscape Drip irrigation systems COM, IRR, IND, GVT Bubbler/Soaker irrigation systems COM, IRR, IND, GVT High-efficiency sprinkler/system COM, IRR, IND, GVT measurel.lis 5 Water Conservation Measures Aill Large Landscape Timers COM, IRR, IND, GVT Soil sensors COM, IRR, IND, GVT Rain sensors COM, IRR, IND, GVT Computer stations COM, IRR, IND, GVT Weather station hook-ups IRR, GVT Water efficient plant material COM, IRR, IND, GVT Xeriscaping COM, IRR, IND, GVT Turf replacement/reduction COM, IRR, IND, GVT Irrigation scheduling COM, IRR, IND, GVT Soil preparation/mulching COM, IRR, IND, GVT All weather artificial recreation surfaces IRR, GVT Recirculating water features COM, IRR, IND, GVT Graywater systems COM, IRR, IND, GVT Storage reservoir and pumping systems to capture and use stormwater runoff IRR, GVT Distribution system Leak detection and repair service/training UTL Periodic valve servicing and adjustment UTL Periodic equipment servicing UTL Agricultural Miscellaneous Note: We have not included measures that make use of reclaimed water from municipal wastewater treatment plants in this list (e.g. for irrigation, cooling, etc.), only measures that reuse, recycle and otherwise reduce customer's own wastewater on-site. measurel.lis 6 Water Conservation Measures Abbreviations: SFR: Single Family Residences MFR: Multi Family Residences COM: Commercial IND: Industrial GVT: Government and Exempt Institutions IRR: Irrigators/Large landscapers UTL: Utility GPM: gallon per minute ULFT: Ultra low flow toilet GPF: gallon per flush ppm: parts per million HVAC: Heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems measure 1.lis 7 Water Conservation Measures Attachment 2 REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN -PHASE 2 QUALITATIVE SCREENING Qualitative Screening Criteria:::.. .:.. :.An?X'indicates that the measure is eliminated;: see numbered notes below forreason for elirnination .::.::`:';:.: : ..' :': .: <.. ;;:,;. .;,... ;:;: ': :BetteY:.': ;;.Techno-.•', .;,;;.Poor `i Poor::: : :: .:.EnvionrYieititel.:, ;:»:;;Cantirlue„':: ;:..Non, End-Use': Conservation Measure :.' >: Measure logical/Market Utility Customer. : end Health to be 'Quantifiable : - : :T::::: : veilab a Matur Match Acc enoe Conoerns Co 1 ;,. :...A i .:' ..::.. iri::: . apt nsidered : Res. Shower Low-flow showerheads Yes 'Ultra low-flow showerheadsYea Showerflow restrictors X[1] I X(11 No Res. Faucets Low-flow faucets I I I I I I Yes I ILow-flow faucet aerators I Yes Res. Toilets ULFT gravity-flow tank-type Yes ULFT pressurized tank type X121 No ULFT special < 1 gallon flush models X[31 No Toilet Retrofit Displacement bags Yes Displacement bottles X141 No Displacement dams X[5] No Dual-flush adapters Yes Fill cycle regulators Yes Early closure flappers I Yes Leaks- Faucet (Faucet washers I I I I Yes Leaks-Toilet Flapper valves IYes I Fill valves Yes Leak detection tables I Yes (Res. Washers ((LowerHorizontal volume axis vertical axis I I I I I Yes Yes (Res. Dish Washers (Lower volume dishwashers I I I I I I Yes Res. Misc Replace self-regenerating water softeners I X(61 No Point-of-use water heaters X171 No Individual dwelling unit sub-meters Yes Separate irrigation sub-meters Xl81 No Metering all accounts Yes Water pressure regulator Yes Res. Outdoor Hose control nozzles Yes Garden hose timers • Yes Drip irrigation systems Yes Bubbler/Soaker irrigation systems • Yes Automatic sprinkler system Yes Soil sensors Yes Rain sensors Yes Water efficient plant material Yes Xeriscapinq Yes Turf reduction/replacement Yes Irrigation scheduling Yes qual_scr.xls Page 1 11/23/93 REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN -PHASE 2 QUALITATIVE SCREENING .. . •;:i..-..:,.."••••:.-i::i...- -.:.:. :7:•.;••:::.',. ......QuelitatiVe Screening Crftsiiria.:i:••1'....:',',', ,•••:." -...li:':'..i:'-.,:::•..'''.:ii.i::•.::.;•: ..i:;.,...•,:A..--...:i':••..,:':.:::•-:;::• Ae:-..X] Indicates that'll*ieeesuie.ls:::Onikieliecl;..: :',.:4::....i .,::4i.;A:..: ii. •'::..• :•i.,.:•-..:.,.••• •••:,...--"...",, ••••::.••:,. ....• -:,,,.. :-.:::.• .:•,•::.::-•••::::::.•:•.:,:":::i:::...'-';:i:::•.:..•::i:,::*::::iiii-..:i•:4::.:,::: . _ ':•::<..:'i:•?;.:::••i.••.•:.:':', see numbered Kota*below-for reesOri.for..eliminotiort.,...,..:.:::::..:..x.ii:;::::...:...i...::..:.* . . Better 7. 0 :i.r0 ... .. ... . .. .... ... .... . .':•....:.:...:.':::::: : :.: :.::::?•i',',..:::;:•'.. i'..-i',i:,:...i::::,...:.......M:1-.:,..:•--... i•'•:::..1':•...::::::1:.j;::;i.,,,1:::..i.j.:'::,:.: -...•':'•-..•.4..::i:•;:.. 4. ! :i•:. ::'•:.': ::.: ..# .r.1. .`-'i•:i:i;i.i:%•:5::.- !:]!..!.. ..:.;:: :::;:i-::::::::!).0(...i:1:':i.1.::::g0*f`.? N0#1:g i:iic.0004./]!' :•:::4iik140..711:....::.::,]. E.Pii414.:j. :1: :.:::.. :::::'::: . :Co .:.:;:.:.:.: :.'.''.:' j::'.:.-:.-:.7'1.1'.g..., :': i'Mi.#iiiii.''0:?.':4 3.- !..60011.,Me4fiiit::,'4'1.:11PO.iii:::ii'0. .' c!.4i01*-::-:i::i:1::A4*F!'00:0KIM.,:e•:::::.•*::041•::••:-N::::':::•:Cli 10t10:*144::•':•'• • •'•;::::.•:.]...:1:• :::..:.-:-.•:::::::-::::: :..:i•:--::4:'':•M:.'.P::••Ai..•::•::.1:'••;':'•.•'i•:;j: .'...:::::•: .:":••::.:.•::::••::.:•:::.•::::•:: .. i:?.::•.:Mifiliatitti:-:::::. ::1:::;::•• Mittaiiv,:i:: -.: :::.• -•Alittah..:•i::i:-: .Cotiiiie : .O'efieldelea?...::.:'Res. Outdoor Outdoor (cont.) {Soil preparation/mulching Yea Graywater systems Yes Rainwater collector/cistern Yes Swimming pool covers X[9] No Comm. Toilets Commercial ULFT Yes ULFT valve replacement Yes Ultra-low flush urinals Yes Ultra-low flush urinal valve replacement Yes Infra-red activated flushing Yea Comm. Faucets Pressure closing faucet (w/aerator) Yes Spring loaded faucet(w/aerator) Yes Infra-red activated faucet(w/aerator) Yes Ultrasonic activated (w/aerator) Yes Foot pedal operated faucet(w/aerator) Yea Comm. Misc. Point-of-use water heaters Yes Recirculating hot water system devices Yes Swimming pool covers Yes Water softeners-centralized regeneration X 161 No Water softeners-meter-controlled flushing X[8] No Comm. Washers Efficient machines (laundromat) Yes Batch washers Yes X(10] Tunnel washers Yes )([10] Rinse water reclamation Yea Car Washes II I I I Yes Yes Loi r cvuollautmi hag caaarr wwaasshheerss Air-cooled machines Air-cooled package HVAC Yes Air cooled chillers Yes Air cooled pumps Yea Air-cooled compressors Yes Air cooled ice-makers (5 year life) Yes Cold-water drinking fountain Yes Medical equipment • X[11] No Laboratory equipment X[111 No Food handling 1Counter-current dishwashers (Recirculating) Yes "Chemical sanitizer dishwashers X[12] No 'Conveyor belt dishwashers X1131 No lUltra-sound dishwashers X1141 No qual_scr.xls Page 2 11/23/93 REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN -PHASE 2 QUALITATIVE SCREENING ue e S eenin"Crtte .. Q Iltahv cr � rte;:::::::>:::>:::::.;`''>..:,`:>:;:k<ii>;;:>::» <:s..... mtiered no s low. o r a n for:al�m nate > :.:. et,: >J<i;i .. :........:.. :.;:::..;:...:::.;.. :;.::::. :::::>:>::::::>:.;:::>:::::»::»;:>::>::>:>:;:.:;::>::>:::a:::>::>:::<:::::::;;::>::;::>:.;:<;:::::::::>::>::>::>::<:::>::::>;:::s:>: e d ......... .... .00 .. >::»::»>:::>:<::.>: ..Oil....:: bf'.:»::>:z.>:;:><i' tii►4!'::<:::< :' :>:::. N..n......,.... ............................ .............. .............. ........13gtter..................? ohn ........ .....:..:.P t.:.:.... .._::::...Poor::.......:.:::.�nyit..:me�t3.::.....:::::::.:o;t.......+is................................ Quanti able4. Food handling Dishwasher water reuse Yes Warming tables with dry heat X1151 No Garbage disposers using recycled water X1161 No Off-site garbage disposal X[18] No Heat exchangers Closed loop Yes X[101 Steam condensate return system Yes X[10] Cooling towers Modifications Yes X[101 Evaporative coolers Modifications Yes XI101 Industrial Misc. Solenoid and other automatic control valves Yes X[10] Industrial washers and rinsers Yes X[101 High pressure/low volume spray nozzles Yes X1101 Close system chillers and warmers Yes X[10] On-site water reclamation/treatment systems X1171 No Industrial water recycling Yes X[10] Waste stream separation to facilitate reclamation Yes X[10] Operation and/or process modification Yes X[10] Sub-meter for irrigation Yes Large Landscapes Drip irrigation systems Yes Bubbler/Soaker irrigation systems Yes High-Efficiency sprinkler system Yes Timers Yes X[10] Soil sensors Yes Rain sensors Yes Computer stations Yes Weather station hook-ups Yes X1101 Water efficient plant material Yes Xeriscaping Yes Turf reduction/Replacement Yea Irrigation scheduling Yes Soil preparation/mulching Yes All weather artificial recreation surfaces X118] No Recirculating water feature Yes XI101 Stormwater storage reservoir and pump system Yes X[10] Graywater systems X1191 X1191 No qual_scr.xla Page 3 11/23/93 REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY PLAN -PHASE 2 QUALITATIVE SCREENING • <!::..Q litntiv 3 eniri:.Critrto: :<:Ei':>::::: :::>:::>> •>::zi!:<»»>::>:�>:«<'::» ;•: :�;:.>Ari>' [iii o tes.tlie::tFie'' ...esui `:Is_b '::.I..:•:.:eif:::>>::>:<.;;»E'?'�#:> >>:::'>;>::::>::> "'se Hurn re n0 e b lovr:f're son':f;,..'ei'mi`et o�''»<`�!» >�>`:�`'>z;3E'•':�z<�# n . .. s 10 .. I/.,erket.:::: .::::. dust niers:>::::> »::>::>:<end.Hsehh::•::.: ::..::.::to:js.:::::::::..::Quant)liable::.. Distribution system Leak detection and repair Yes Periodic valve servicing and adjustment Yes Periodic equipment servicing Yes Agricultural !Miscellaneous X1201 I I I No Number of initial measures: 113 Number of measures passing: 90 Screenina Rationale [11 Low flow showerheads are a better measure because flow restrictors tend to alter flow pattern and,therefore, are not well-accepted by the consumers. [21 Gravity-flow tank-type ULFTa are less expensive and not as noisy as pressurized tank type ULFTa. [31 Gravity-flow ULFTs(1.8 GPF) are a better measure because they are less expensive and more commercially available. [4] Too bulky for utility delivery. Displacement bags are a better measure. [5] Low customer acceptance because dams wear out too quickly. Displacement bags are a better measure. [8]Water in the region is already soft; water softeners are not often used. [71 Point of use water heaters have limited applicability for residential purposes. [81 Measure does not really save water. Measure is usually implemented to increase billing accuracy. [91 Swimming pool covers have limited applicability for residential use in the region. [101 Savings and costs are site-specific but the measure is retained for customized application. [101 Savings and costs are site-specific but the measure is retained for customized application. [111 Limited applicability because of low water use. [121 May be perceived to be inadequate for cleaning.Also poses potential operational concerns due to handling of bleach. [131 Limited applicability-Conveyor belt dishwashers are not interchangeable with door-type washers. Their capacities differ. [141 Technology has not been adequately tested for commercial application. There are also few manufacturers. [151 Limited applicability because water waste due to evaporation is minimal. [181 Poor customer acceptance because of perceived higher labor cost in implementing measure. [171 Measure has limited applicability in the region. Measure is more appropriate for areas not supplied by a water system. [181 All-weather artificial recreational surfaces may be aesthetically unacceptable. [19] The use of graywater may not be appropriate for the soil type in the region and,therefore, may pose health and safety concerns. [20) Limited number of agricultural customers within the service territory qual_acr.xls Page 4 11/23/93 f j SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON COUNTY JOINT WATER AGENCY 8777 SW Burnham St. P 0 Box 230000 Tigard, OR 97281-1999 639-1554 InterOffice Memo To: JWA Chair Jenkins and Board Members From: John A. Buol, Interim Manager Date: December 3, 1993 Subject: Meeting with City of Portland Regarding Purchasing Water On Monday, November 23, 1993, the Joint Water Agency staff and Patrick Reilly, City Administrator for Tigard, held a meeting with Robert W. Rieck, P E Director, Finance and Support Services and Jim Doane, P E Principal Engineer, City of Portland Water Bureau. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the short and long term purchase of water from Portland. According to the City of Portland's attorney, the staff was informed the current contract is in affect with the new agency. Mr. Rieck also stated the City is currently not interested in changing their longer term agreements until the Regional Water Supply Study is released. The City of Portland informed the group that if we will provide the City with our water needs for the next five years, they will develop a rate for our consideration. They also stated they will be willing to work with the JWA and Tualatin to enable the JWA to purchase water at 72nd and Bonita Road. The City, in their discussion, also stated they were willing to work with the JWA on other water connections such as Bradley Corners. The JWA staff is currently preparing past history and water needs for the next five years so Portland may develop a rate for our consideration. VISITORS PLEASE REGISTER Date: '. (-e11)bed' YI Meeting: 66a(L.1 Name (please print) Do you wish to speak? (yes or no) 1. (7 , 14c-� f '�� 2. (i 4 rg 3. 4. � '� �s /' I J` :' J.� �I>) 5. /---(9?i2 (.- /A..,(.)7 , 7 14/1�i 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. ANN