Loading...
06/08/1993 - Packet ` 1 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 8777 S.W.BURNHAM ST. 'w410 P.O.BOX 230000 TIGARD,OREGON 97281-1999 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT PHONE(503)639-1554 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Agenda 7:30 p.m., June 8, 1993 Call to Order 1. Minutes for May 20 and 25 meetings. Recommendation: Approve the minutes as written. 2. Visitors comments. 3. Payment of vouchers. Recommendation: Approve payment 4. Public hearing for proposed rate increase in retail water rates of 10%, effective July 20, 1993. a. Staff report. b. Open public hearing. Public testimony. c. Close public hearing. d. Board discussion. Recommendation: First reading by title of Ordinance 2-93, amending Ordinance 2-92, Appendix II water rates of the Rules, Rates, and Regulations for water service in the Tigard Water District. 5. Lake Oswego Water Supply Agreement. Recommendation: Delay signing the Lake Oswego Water Supply agreement indefinitely. 6. Administrative Director's Report. a. Work Accomplished Report. b. Interim Intergovernmental Agreement Update. 7. Chair's Comments. 8. Commissioner's Comments. 9. Other Business. 10. Executive Session. The Tigard Water District will go into Executive Session under the provisions of ORS 192- 660(1)(e), (h), and (J) to discuss real property transactions, public investments and possible litigation. Adjournment. liery TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Minutes -Draft 7:30 p.m., May 25, 1993 Commissioners Present: Bob Wyffels, Audrey Castile, Hill Hampton, Clarence Nicoli, John Haunsperger (conference telephone connection). Staff Present: Jeri Chenelle, Administrative Director; Mike Miller, Senior Management Analyst, Lorry Christian, Administrative & Human Resource Coordinator; Nancy Johnson, Accounting Supervisor, David Knowles, Attorney. Absent: Randy Volk, Operations Manager Visitors: Bob Santee, Jack Polans, George Morgan, King City Mayor Lynda Jenkins, Bev Froude, TWD Employee Rusty Thomas, Jon Kvistad (arrived 8:45 p.m.) Chair Wyffels called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 1. Minutes for May 11 meeting. A motion was made by Commissioner Nicoli to approve the minutes. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hampton. A correction was made to the draft of the minutes, page 2, item 5: Ordinance 1-93 was incorrectly written as 2-92. Hearing no discussion, a voice vote was called. The motion to approve the minutes as corrected was unanimously approved. 2. Discuss FY93-94 Budget. A public hearing was held May 11, 1993. Questions raised at that time caused the Board to table the decision on the budget until this meeting. Chair Wyffels made a motion to remove from the table the resolution on the budget. Commissioner Hampton seconded the motion. Chair Wyffels said since there had already been two public hearings, and since the public hearing was adjourned at the May 11 Board meeting, there wouldn't be any public input at this meeting. A voice vote was called. The motion was unanimously approved. After reviewing the approved minutes from the May 11 meeting, Attorney Knowles said the Board's action at that meeting indicates they intended to adjourn the public hearing when they said it was adjourned and no further public comment need be taken at this meeting. The Board, however, had the discretion to take more comments from the public, if they chose. The Board decided to discuss the budget with Staff, and take public input later if there were unanswered questions. Administrative Director Chenelle clarified that the Proposed Budget should read that "part of the reason"for an increase in expenditures in the previous year was due to an increase in water rates from Portland, Chair Wyffels said the increase in water rates from Lake Oswego should be more clearly mentioned. The Board continued with its discussion about the proposed budget. 5/25/93 Minutes,Tigard Water District Board of Commissioners The Board and Administrative Director Chenelle discussed options for specifying a proposed rate increase, and whether the present Water District should approve a rate increase or whether they would wait and let the joint water agency make the decision about if, when, and by how much to increase water rates. Chair Wyffels said if visitors have any new information it could be given at this time. The Board then heard comments from visitors Jack Polans, Bob Santee, George Morgan, and King City Mayor Lynda Jenkins. The Board agreed they preferred to have smaller incremental increases in water rates more frequently rather than larger incremental rate increases less often. Commissioner Hampton made a motion to adopt the proposed budget providing that $300,000 come out of the Operating Contingency Fund to reduce a proposed increase in water rates. The motion died for lack of a second. The Board continued the discussion about the proposed budget. Commissioner Hampton made a motion to adopt Resolution 4-93, to adopt a budget, make appropriations, levy taxes, with the amendment of reducing the Operating Contingency Fund from $596,050 to $305,000. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Castile. Discussion was called for. The intent was to lower the proposed rate increase from 20% to 10%. Hearing no further discussion, a voice vote was called. The motion was unanimously approved. 3. Visitors comments. Visitor Bob Santee asked if there would be an opportunity to make comments on the Lake Oswego contract. Chair Wyffels said the Board would allow comments. At 9:00 p.m., Chair Wyffels called a brief recess of the meeting. At 9:30 p.m., the meeting was called to order again. 4. Dissolution Plan - 190 agreement. Attorney Knowles summarized the situation since the last Board discussion of this issue. On May 4, 1993, the Board approved Resolution 5-93 to initiate proceedings to dissolve the District and liquidate all assets. Since then, Attorney Knowles and TWD Staff met with Mr. Cameron and Mr. Junkin of Washington County to determine representation for the unincorporated area of the Water District after the District dissolved. The Washington County Board of Commissioners had previously discussed the issue informally, and stated they have no interest in participating in the representation of the unincorporated area. In addition, a dissolution plan would have to be approved by the Boundary Commission. In order of preference, if the Water District submitted a dissolution plan, The Boundry Commission, would prefer three options: a. City of Tigard own all of the assets and provide water service within their service territory, as designated by the Boundry Commission (including the unincorporated 2 5/25/93 Minutes,Tigard Water District Board of Commissioners area). Any city is authorized to do this when that city comprises the larger part of the district from which it withdraws. If the District dissolves, the City of Tigard can become the entity which serves the area. b. Have the Tigard Water District remain as a legal, governmental entity, with its own board of commissioners, with boundaries being only the unincorporated area of the present District. c. Dissolution of Tigard Water District and no government substituted to represent the unincorporated area. This is something the Boundary Commission doesn't want to have happen. Attorney Knowles said there appear to be two options: a. Continue with the dissolution plan and provide a plan with the City of Tigard being the service entity providing water to the unincorporated area and a service area designated by the Boundry Commission; or b. Have Tigard Water District remain as a legal entity representing and having boundaries which consist of the unincorporated area, and participate in the 190 agreements. The recommendation of Staff and Attorney Knowles was that, for the time being, the Tigard Water District continue, keeping the option of dissolving as something that could be done in the future. Attorney Knowles presented a draft of an Interim Intergovernmental Agreement between TWD and the Cities of Tigard, Durham and King City, which could be approved if the Board chose to rescind the initiation of dissolution. This interim agreement would provide for the governance of the water system during a short period, perhaps up to one year, while the District and three Cities evaluate the long term structure to provide water service. A motion was made by Chair Wyffels to approve Resolution 8-93 rescinding portions of Resolution 5-93 concerning dissolution of Tigard Water District. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Haunsperger. Discussion was called for. Hearing no further discussion, a voice vote was called. The motion was approved unanimously. Attorney Knowles reviewed the draft interim intergovernmental agreement and the Board listened to comments and questions from visitors Bev Froude, and King City Mayor Lynda Jenkins. He clarified that the new Water District Board (after July 1) would have five members and would consist of residents or electors of the unincorporated area. The new joint water agency would have seven appointed board members. Attorney Knowles said there are two options to maintaining the Water District Board: (1) Go through a process of resignation and appointment until there are three members of the Board eligible to serve (eligibility depends on they being residents of the unincorporated area); or(2) the Washington County Board of Commissioners to appoint until there is a majority so the District could continue operating. The Board took comments from visitors Jack Polans, and Bob Santee. 3 • 5/25/93 Minutes,Tigard Water District Board of Commissioners Attorney Knowles asked the Board for an indication of consensus about whether they wanted "``" him to continue to pursue the interim intergovernmental government. There was unanimous approval by the Board for Attorney Knowles to pursue the discussions about the interim intergovernmental with the three Cities. 5. Lake Oswego Water Supply Agreement: Administrative Director Chenelle said both the Lake Oswego City Council and the TWD Board of Commissioners have approved this agreement, but the agreement hasn't been signed because of difficulties in scheduling a signing ceremony. The City of Tigard has presented a list of questions and concerns and requested that the agreement not be signed, but rather let the new joint water agency make the final decision on it. Lake Oswego is concerned about maintaining a cooperative relationship with the new governing body. Options for the Board include: (1) signing the agreement; (2) delay the agreement; or (3) rescind the Board's decision to approve the contract. Commissioner Castile made a motion to delay commitment by signature of the agreement with Lake Oswego, and give it over to the joint water agency to sign. The motion died due to lack of a second. The Board continued its discussion about questions and concerns received from patrons of the District. %,e A motion was made by Commissioner Castile to delay signature of the agreement until the next Board meeting, during which time Staff will solicit additional information from people with water provider experience. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Haunsperger. Discussion was called for. The Board took comments from visitors Jenkins and Santee. A voice vote was called. Commissioner Yes No Castile X Hampton X Haunsperger X Nicoli X Wyffels X due to lack of clarity The vote was approved 4-1. Commissioner Castile said she believed the contract with Lake Oswego should have been signed without intervention from the City of Tigard, and she made the motion to delay signing only to be responsive and conscientious to the public. Chair Wyffels adjourned the meeting at 10:47 p.m. 4 , ,,,,,,,, MEETING DATE: June 8, 1993 TO: Honorable Chair and Board of Commissioners FROM: Jeri L. Chenelle, Administrative Director SUBJECT: Amending the Water Rates Statement of the subject: The District's revenue is not sufficient to meet the District's expenditures. In both the 1992-93 fiscal year(FY) budget and the 1993-94 FY budget, funds from the unappropriated ending fund balance have been used to balance the budget. A rate increase is needed. Recommendation: Approve Ordinance 2-93, an ordinance amending Ordinance 2-92, which will increase the water rates by 10%. Analysis: The City of Lake Oswego has announced that during the 93-94 FY they will increase their wholesale water rate from $0.50 to $0.57 effective July 1, 1993. This increase computes to a 14%rate increase, which is in addition to the 25% wholesale rate increase that the City of Lake Oswego imposed on the Water District last year. The 14% rate increase results in an additional expenditure of $156,660 to purchase water from Lake Oswego. As a side note, the City of Lake Oswego is increasing water rates to its own in- city customers. As we look at the adopted 93-94 budget we can see that even with a 10%rate increase, a 10%rate increase will generate approximately $291,025 in revenues. However, the revenues are still $321,210 short of the departmental expenditures. When we add the Capital Project Reserve Fund and the Contingency Fund to the revenue shortfall, the total deficiency reaches $926,210. In order to have a zero balance, not having a surplus or deficiency of revenue,the District would have to raise existing water rates a total of 42%. Although this in itself is significant, there is a historical factor to consider. In the 92-93 FY adopted budget$952,000 was moved from the surplus "unappropriated ending fund balance" in order to balance the General Fund budget. As indicated in the recently adopted 93-94 FY budget, $926,210 will be moved from the "unappropriated ending fund balance," in order to balance next year's General Fund budget. If this trend continues one more year, the net result is that there will be no unappropriated ending fund balance to begin the new fiscal year. During the 92-93 fiscal year, Portland's rates increased from $1.535 to $3.23 per 100 "'`""" cubic feet, a 110% increase. However, because of the water restrictions during last summer, the Water District did not purchase Bull Run water. This resulted in the water costs from Portland to be reduced to $1.767 per 100 cubic feet for the 93-94 FY. At this time it appears that there will be no water restrictions this summer. If our water purchases from Portland increase during this summer, it can be theorized that our costs to purchase Bull Run water during the 94-95 fiscal year will also increase, unless a new contract can be negotiated. Even though the amount of water purchased from Portland is small, it does add to the depletion of our unappropriated ending fund balance. What The Rate Increase Means To An Average Customer: Water users under this proposal with standard 5/8" x 3/4" water meters will be billed a minimum charge of$7.15 for 400 cubic feet of water and an additional $1.32 per 100 cubic feet over the minimum. The current rate is $6.50 for the first 400 cubic feet of water plus $1.20 per each additional 100 cubic feet over the minimum per month. The result of this new rate increase on our average customer who uses 1100 cubic feet of water a month, is to increase that water bill from $14.90 to $16.39 per month. The net difference or change is $1.49. Since most water bills are sent every other month the actual two month water bill in this example would be $32.78, an increase of$2.98 over the current pricing structure. Fiscal Impact: By increasing the water rates 10%the Water District will increase its revenue approximately $291,026 depending on the total amount of water sold during fiscal year 93-94. If the Water District should take the position to not increase the water rates, so as to cover the wholesale water rate increase from the City of Lake Oswego with carry over funds, the Water District's deficit in revenues would reach $1,221,255, thus rapidly depleting the Water District's reserves. Attached is a worksheet of the "Future Projections of Revenues and Expenditures" showing the rapid depletion of the Water District's reserves. The 93-94 FY budget approved by the Board includes a 10%rate increase. Alternate: Take no action and begin proceedings to amend the 93-94 budget to reflect the loss of revenue. This will result in the Water District continuing to subsidize the wholesale water rate increases from Lake Oswego out of the unappropriated ending fund balance. JC:MM:mm i _ FUTURE PROJECTIONS REVENUES & EXPENDITURES 1992-93 FY 1993-94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY BUDGETED BUDGETED ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ESTIMATE REVENUES 3,709,000 3,682,700 3,682,700 3,682,700 3,682,700 3,682,700 3,682,700 EXPENDITUES -4,083,600 -4,003,910 -4,164,066 -4,330,629 -4,503,854 -4,684,008 -4,871,369 -374,600 -321,210 -481,366 -647,929 -821,154 -1,001,308 -1,188,669 RESERVES -300,000 -300,000 -300,000 0 0 0 0 CONTINGENCY -277,400 -305,000 -305,000 -305,000 -305,000 -305,000 -305,000 -952,000 -926,210 -1,086,366 -952,929 -1,126,154 -1,306,308 -1,493,669 BEG. FUND BAL. 1,952,000 2,000,000 1,073,790 -12,576 -965,505 -2,091,660 -3,397,968 ENDING FUND BAL 1,000,000 1,073,790 -12,576 -965,505 -2,091,660 -3,397,968 -4,891,637 ASSUMPTIONS: • 4% Inflation factor for expenditures. • No increase in revenues beyond 1993-94 FY budget. • Contingency constant at $305,000. • No reserve account for future improvements after 1994-95 FY. Tigard Water District Ordinance No. 2-93 An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2-92 Appendix II, water rates, of the Rules, Rates, and Regulations for water service in the Tigard Water District. Whereas, the District's revenue is not sufficient to meet the District's expenditures; and Whereas, the Board of Commissioners of the Tigard Water District recommends the rates and charges prescribed herein be adopted in order to help meet the District's revenue requirements. NOW THEREFORE, THE TIGARD WATER DISTRICT ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Ordinance No. 2-92, Appendix II, shall be amended as follows (language to be deleted is shown in [BRACKETS]; language to be added is UNDERLINED): APPENDIX II--Water Rates Monthly Minimum* Out of District Meter Size (400 cubic feet) (additional) 5/8" x 3/4" $7.15 [$6.50] $2.75 [$2.50] 1" 11.55 [10.50] 4.40 [4.00] 1 1/2" 18.15 [16.50] 6.60 [6.00] 2" 36.85 [33.50] 11.00 [10.00] 3" 67.65 [61.50] 16.50 [15.00] 4" 113.85 [103.50] 20.90 [19.00] 6" 158.95 [144.50] 30.80 [28.00] 8" 221.10 [201.00] 41.80 [38.00] Rate over 400 cubic feet: $1.32 [$1.20] per 100 cubic feet. Section 2: This ordinance shall be effective on or after the 30th day after its passage by . the Board of Commissioners. PASSED by the Board of Commissioners of the Tigard Water District this day of June, 1993, by unanimous vote of the members of the Board. First reading June 8, 1993 Chair of the Board Second reading Administrative Director InterOffice Memo To: Honorable Chair& Board of Commissioners From: Jeri L. Chenelle, Administrative Director Date: June 3, 1993 Subject: Lake Oswego Water Supply Agreement Statement of Issue: At its meeting held May 25, 1993, the Board of Commissioners voted to delay signing the contract with Lake Oswego until the next Board meeting, during which time Staff was directed to solicit additional information from people with water provider experience. These comments are attached. Recommendation: Delay signing the Lake Oswego Water Supply agreement indefinitely. Analysis: Based on an engineering study done in 1990 which evaluated the relative costs of a long- term water supply from Portland, Lake Oswego, the Willamette River, and the Joint w... Water Commission, lengthy negotiations took place between the Tigard Water District and the City of Lake Oswego. After literally years of negotiations, the first phase of a mutual commitment for long term water supply was agreed to and approved by the Board April 8, 1993. The Tigard City Council has now requested that TWD delay signing the agreement so that the new Joint Water Agency can make the final decision. Comments were received from Economic and Engineering Services and from the Manager of the Clackamas Water District at no cost. Questions were raised about a long-term methodology for rate-setting, the length of the agreement, and curtailment requirements. On the other hand, the appropriateness of the rate increases and of the 50% cost sharing for the main transmission line were also affirmed by some comments. A number of things have changed since the original study. The City of Tigard would like to see an analysis which includes Tualatin Valley as a source, for instance. This was not included previously. There are different "players" coming aboard, in that both the joint water agency and the remnant TWD will have new board members. Mike Rosenberger of Portland Water Bureau has indicated he may be able to negotiate a new water cost agreement because a new agency will exist. Other water rate costs in the original study have since changed. It has been TWD's plan to commit to Lake Oswego as our major water source while also taking more water from Portland throughout the year in order to keep our costs down. We believe that the new joint water agency may come to the same conclusions, although ,�, the exact agreement may not look the same. Lake Oswego wants the new joint water Lake Oswego Water Supply Agreement 06/03/93 Page 2 agency to be happy with the agreement, because they want a good working relationship with the successors to the agreement. Therefore, it is recommended that TWD delay signing the agreement indefinitely. It should be noted that Lake Oswego has given the District notice of a rate increase to $0.57 per unit effective July 1, 1993. The existing 10 year agreement expires July 1, 1993, but it automatically renews for the five years unless the terms of the agreement are amended by mutual agreement of the parties. Fiscal Impact: Uncertain. The provisions of the existing agreement state that rate adjustments are in the sole discretion of Lake Oswego. Alternatives: 1. Sign the agreement. 2. Suggest changes to the agreement to be renegotiated with Lake Oswego and brought back for final approval before June 30. r1Y June 2, 1993 To: Jeri L. Chenelle, Administrative Director Tigard Water District From: Dale Jutila, General Manager Clackamas Water District Subject: Water Supply Agreement with Lake Oswego After a brief review of the agreement with Lake Oswego, I would like to share the following comments with you: 1. RATES: The rates are probably in line with others. Negotiated rates are okay for the short-term, which this contract is, but for the long-term, it is important to have a specified %tw methodology for rate increases. 2. COST-SHARING: A 50%-50% sharing of costs for the main transmission line seems reasonable. The cost of the 24 inch line is about half the costs of the 36 inch line. More importantly, Tigard Water District's consumption accelerates Lake Oswego's need for the pipeline. Tigard Water District should probably pay more because of accelerating the need for the pipeline. 3. PORTLAND WATER: You might want to give some thought to buying Portland water year round. Through system operation and manipulation, you may be able to bring the price down. 4. CURTAILMENT: If both parties accept responsibility for the system, then it seems that both parties should be willing to share in curtailment should the need arise. It does not appear that Lake Oswego has the obligation to do that in this agreement. Tuit-I — 1 — 9 TUE 1 1 : 40 EGOH 6 ENG P .. 132 ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. 43B0 S.W.Macadam Avenue.Sulu 355 Penland,OA 87261 (543)2233033•FAX(503)274-6248 Fife#' June 1, 1993 Jeri L Chenelle Administrator Tigard Water District F.O. Box 230000 Tigard, OR 97023 Re: Lake Oswego Water Simply Agreement Technical Review Dear Jeri: As you requested on May 27th,we have made a technical review of the tentative agreement. Our commentary is set forth herein. When "District" is used, it is intended to cover the District as now established as well as any successor organizations. 1. The methodology for rate setting now and in the future is not given After 1997, this methodology could be key to the District's interests. 2. The methodology for rate setting when future capacity-increasing capital improvements is not given. Again, this could be key to the District's interests. 3. The term of the agreement and renewal provisions are not evident to us. We think that an argument can be made that the term is only four years. If that were the case,then water from Lake Oswego becomes very expensive,indeed. On the other hand, since the term is not stated, then it could be argued that the term is perpetuity. 4. Obviously, if the 4 mgd guarantee is insufficient, then on the near term the District will have to purchase water from Portland. S. If the District were to issue 20-year, 6%bonds to fund the $1,500,000 capital contribution to Oswego and if the District were to average 4 mgd usage of Oswego water over that 20 year term, then the contribution reduces to 6.74/ccf of purchased water. Remember, also, the District's cost of pumping Oswego's water from Waluga. In 1990 the pumping cost was 2.4diccf. Thus, initially, water from Oswego could cost a total of about 66tt/ccf on a wholesale basis. Olympia,WA Solivvue,WA Vancouver.B.0 Pvrtland.O9 WaOirlaton.n c -TUM- 1 -93 TUE 1 1 : 4 1 ECCIII ENG SVS -SPD :{ Jeri L. Chenelle June 1, 1993 (E0 Page two We hope these comments help your analysis of the agreement. Time constraints prevent a more detailed review,but we think the foregoing covers the major elements of significance to Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. Very truly yours, ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. Gilbert R. Meigs, P.E. GRM/db Nik"' TIGARD WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING To: Honorable Chair and Board of Commissioners From: Jeri L. Chenelle Date: May 25, 1993 Subject: Lake Oswego Water Supply Agreement Statement of the issue: At its meeting of May 18, 1993, the Tigard City Council asked that the Tigard Water District not sign the Lake Oswego Water Supply Agreement in order to let the new water agency make the final decision. Tigard Water District approved the agreement on April 13 and Lake Oswego approved the agreement on May 4, 1993. Recommendation: The Board may choose to go ahead and sign the agreement which has already been approved by both agencies. Or, the Board may choose not to sign the agreement at this time, and give an opportunity •,yam,, to the new joint water agency board to review the decision and make the final determination. History: The current water supply agreement with Lake Oswego expires on June 30, 1993. The current agreement will automatically renew for five years, unless the terms of this agreement are amended by mutual agreement of the parties. For several years, the District has negotiated with the City of Lake Oswego in anticipation of the upcoming expiration date. Negotiations had bogged down to a series of letters that were not achieving any results. I was brought in as a consultant in the spring of 1992 in order to achieve an agreement with Lake Oswego. Negotiations to develop an intergovernmental agreement to form a new joint water agency were begun about the same time. The cities were given the opportunity to participate in the negotiating committee to deal with the Lake Oswego contract, but declined. Agenda packets of every TWD Board meeting have been given to the City Managers so that they would be informed, and verbal updates were given at various meetings with them. An earlier engineering study compared the costs of a variety of water sources, and concluded that Lake Oswego and the City of Portland were the best options for long term supply, if improvements were made to each system in the future. Financial contributions would be required from TWD to each system. In earlier negotiations with Lake Oswego, `'""' the TWD Board had requested part ownership of the system in exchange for TWD's Lake Oswego Water Supply Agreement 05/25/93 Page 2 financial contributions to improvements in the Lake Oswego system which would provide Nifty more water for us. Lake Oswego balked at this, and finally, in the spring of 1992, their Council formed a Water Subcommittee which debated this issue and made recommendations to their Council. The Council formed a concrete position that they would not relinquish part ownership of their water system. The TWD Board decided that if it could get a guarantee of water, that would be more important than ownership in the system. Funding improvements in the Lake Oswego system which would result in more water to us would be similar to prior improvements in Portland's system we had paid for in order to receive more water. Thus, negotiations began. Earlier engineering studies had recommended three specific improvements in Lake Oswego's system if they were to provide more water for us: 1. Increasing the size of the main transmission line from the treatment plant; 2. Expanding the water treatment plant; and 3. Increasing the intake from the river. Because we use 45% of the water produced by Lake Oswego and our use is increasing due to growth, the TWD Board agreed to pay half the costs of the new transmission line. In exchange, Lake Oswego agreed to give us a guarantee of 4 million gallons of water a day, instead of just offering surplus water as in the previous contract. Lake Oswego also agreed to increase the guarantee of water to us in the future as their ability to provide more water increased. They have been working on a number of technical improvements to their existing system which could increase the amount of water they can provide to us without major expense, and also on improving their intertie with South Fork Water District in order to ship surplus water from South Fork to us. Because the existing water supply agreement states, "The amount of rate adjustment, if any, shall be in the sole discretion of the City", we chose to negotiate a series of rate increases that would be known and could be planned for in order to prevent unknown future expenses. TWD did not want to find itself in the position of contributing to improvements needed to supply water to us, and then have rate increases similar to Portland's rate increases dropped on us. The following rate increases were negotiated as acceptable by the TWD Board: March 1, 1993 - February 28, 1994 $0.57 per 100 cubic feet March 1, 1994 - June 30, 1995 $0.62 per 100 cubic feet July 1, 1995 - June 30, 1996 $0.65 per 100 cubic feet July 1, 1996 - June 30, 1997 $0.69 per 100 cubic feet These rate increases were significantly lower than Lake Oswego's proposal. The rate increases and the main transmission line agreement were wrapped together into one contract which was approved by both the City of Lake Oswego and the Tigard Water District. Lake Oswego Water Supply Agreement 05/25/93 Page 3 Attached is a memo from Mike Miller, Sr. Management Analyst and Engineering Coordinator, regarding the future water supply for TWD. Lake Oswego's Reaction: Needless to say, Lake Oswego is distressed over the possibility of another stop in this project. They have started engineering on this project twice, and incurred costs because of the stops and starts. Another delay will stop the bid preparation process in which they are now engaged. They want to respond to the City of Tigard's concerns, but are unsure what they are. They also want to have a good working relationship with the new joint water agency, as they have with the Tigard Water District. If it is necessary to delay this agreement, they will cooperate. InterOffice Memo To: Jeri L. Chenelllee.dministrative Director From: Michael Milld"r °Senior Management Analyst g Y Date: May 25, 1993 Subject: Future water supply for TWD In response to Bob Santee's comments regarding the water supply options of the Tigard Water District, I would like to shed some factual information on this subject. This information is also contained in the 1990 Water Supply& Water Distribution Study for the Tigard Water District by Economic and Engineering Services, Inc. and my June 30, 1992 memo regarding the construction of the 24-inch Transmission main under Hwy. 217. The Portland Connection Currently Portland has 6 to 8 MGD (million gallons per day) available at our connection with them at Bradley Corner (SW Greenburg Road and SW Hall Blvd.). Through the existing facilities, the Water District has been able to receive water from this point of connection at a rate of 5,600 gpm. If the Water District were to utilize this amount of flow for a 24 hour period, we would receive 8.06 MGD. What this is stating is that even sow if the Water District had an additional 24-inch main, (from just south of Hwy. 217 to Bradley Corner) installed and operational, the District would not be able to import any more water from that connection. The water main from the connection at Bradley Corner to Portland is just not big enough. Because the water at Bradley Corner originates from Portland's Burlingame Reservoir Towers near Wilson High School, Portland has recommended that we install a 30-inch water main from those reservoirs to Bradley Corner. Currently the Burlingame reservoirs are filled by the Carolina and Fulton Pumping Stations, which have a combined pumping capacity of 32.4 MGD. According to Portland Water Bureau's data, only 11.4 MGD capacity is currently being utilized. This means that Portland does have the pumping capacity in place, if they have the water available. It is important to restate that additional water cannot be delivered to the Bradley Corner connection until such time that the 30-inch transmission main is installed. It is estimated that if the Water District were to partake in such a venture, it would cost the Water District $5,000,000. This figure is only for the 30-inch transmission main and does not include any internal improvements to the Water District's system, namely the 24-inch transmission main and bores under Hwy. 217 along SW Greenburg Road. Nor does the $5,000,000 buy the Water District part ownership in the Portland system. Even though the Water District were to pay for the 30-inch water main, Portland would retain ownership of that line. Future water supply for TWD 05/25/93 Page 2 One other historical item about our Portland connection: In 1973, 7,000 feet of 24-inch `. water main (from SW Garden Home Road and Oleson Road to Bradley Corner)was financed by Tigard Water District, Metzger Water District, the Winmar Corporation (Washington Square), and the City of Beaverton, but the title to the entire line from Burlingame is held by Portland. The Water District contributed $30,000 toward the $175,000 total for the 7,000 feet of 24-inch water line. The total projected need was 15 MGD, with the Water District's share being 3.65 MGD. Water Cost from Portland Another area of concern with water from Portland is the cost. The water costs from the City of Portland are based on how the Water District takes Bull Run water over the course of the last fiscal year. Portland uses a scale that considers exactly when the Water District took the water, whether or not it was a peak day (a peak day is when the outdoor temperature reaches —85 degrees F. and 200 MG passes through the headworks), peak hour (3:00 PM to 9:00 PM), or a combination peak day/peak hour. During the 92-93 fiscal year, Portland's rates increased from $1.535 to $3.23 per 100 cubic feet, a 110% increase. However, because of the water restrictions last summer, the Water District did not purchase any Bull Run water. This resulted in the water costs from Portland to be reduced to $1.767 per 100 cubic feet for this coming fiscal year. Because it appears that there will be no water restrictions from Portland this summer, our purchases of Bull Run water will increase and the resulting effect will likely be that our costs to purchase this water during the 94-95 fiscal year will also increase. The Lake Oswego Connection For many years the Water District has been actively pursuing a firm commitment from the City of Lake Oswego to either become part owners of their Water Treatment Plant or to have a guaranteed supply of water. Since Lake Oswego is not interested in selling part of their plant to the Water District, the latter has been the Board's direction for the District. The Water District has been actively pursuing both Portland and Lake Oswego to receive the best value for its dollar. In 1991, the Water District completed the paralleling of the 16-inch water main with a 24-inch transmission main for Lake Oswego water from the Bonita Pump Station to SW Gaarde Street and Pacific Hwy. With our transmission lines in place to Lake Oswego, the Water District will be able to receive a 16.9 MGD peak flow. Of course, in order to distribute this flow within the Water District, we will need to construct a new 9.0 MGD pump station at the District's Bonita Road site, and Lake Oswego will need to expand their Water Treatment Plant. Lake Oswego Treatment Plant Future water supply for TWD 05/25/93 Page 3 It was only two years ago that Lake Oswego's Water Treatment Plant could only supply Now 14.4 MGD. Last year Lake Oswego took the first step to correct this situation and cleaned the transmission line from the plant to Lake Oswego, thus enabling them to increase the amount of water delivered to the City. This spring (1993) the Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant has been able to increase its throughput to 18 MGD by pigging (cleaning) the raw water lines under the Willamette River and by rebuilding one of the intake pumps. Operating at this level is within the design capacity of the intake and raw water transmission line. In addition, Lake Oswego and the Clackamas Water District are working together on a pilot project on the Clackamas River to see if a new technology in filter media and techniques will be able to increase the capacity of the filter plants without the expense of building new filtration facilities. With this new technology, Lake Oswego believes that it should be able to increase the existing Water Treatment Plant production by 20-35%. This means that the Water Treatment Plant could be producing as much as 24.3 MGD for a minimum amount of money. I would like to point out a rather significant fact, and that is that the existing transmission line from the Water Treatment Plant to Lake Oswego is at design capacity. In other words no matter how much more water can be produced at the Water Treatment Plant, it cannot be carried through the existing transmission main to Lake Oswego. This is the main reason why it is so important to have the new 36-inch transmission main in place and operational within the near future. Also, the 36-inch transmission main will allow Lake Oswego to import water from South Fork Water Board through their connection with West Linn to help supply our summer peak demands. The estimated yield of this connection is 3-5 MGD. With Lake Oswego allowing the Water District to participate financially in the costs of constructing the 36-inch transmission main, we are in a way, developing the partnership that the Water District has been after all along. This partnership does come with a price, however. Lake Oswego Capital Improvement Program I have attached the Capital Improvement Program list necessary for Lake Oswego to provide water for both themselves and Tigard Water District, and the Capital Improvement Program for Lake Oswego only, to show the associated costs involved. Each of the projects have been prioritized by Lake Oswego as to the order in which they should be accomplished. These projects are about the same except that the projects for Lake Oswego are a scaled down version to serve only Lake Oswego's needs. Within the next 10 to 15 years Lake Oswego will need to spend $8,665,614 to construct these projects to meet their own needs. These same types of projects will cost $30,730,489 if they are expanded to meet the needs of the Water District and Lake Oswego. If you subtract the costs that Lake Oswego would incur on their own from the costs associated with expanding their facilities to accommodate the Water District's demand, the Water Districts share would be $22,064,875. This is approximately the same Future water supply for TWD 05/25/93 Page 4 amount of money that was reported by Engineer Gil Meigs in the 1990 Water Supply and Distribution Study. Alternate Water Sources When we look at the four supply alternatives that were discussed in the 1990 Water Supply and Distribution Study, we find the following facts: Alternate Source Total Cost Levelized Annual Costs City of Lake Oswego $21,432,000 $1.158/ccf City of Portland $5,667,000 $1.098/ccf Joint Water Commission $37,860,000 $1.723/ccf Willamette River $29,690,000 $1.683/ccf Even if the Water District were to go with the lowest cost source option, that being with the City of Portland, the levelized annual costs over 20 years is not that much less expensive than that of Lake Oswego. Also, the Water District will never have a guaranteed supply with Portland as it would with the City of Lake Oswego. And, as we saw last summer during the water restriction, Portland does not have a reliable source of water for all of their customers. Of all the alternate sources listed above, Portland is the only water source that is not saw filtered. This explains why the levelized costs to purchase Portland water is the most inexpensive; however, this price will not last long. It is expected that Portland will be required to build a filter plant in the future. They have already had several violations of federal law on this issue. In addition, Portland's well field is not a reliable source of water. DEQ and EPA regulations have shut down the well field, and tests are tracking the nearby contamination plume. Portland is hopeful of getting approval to use at least a portion of the wells this summer, but as recently as a month ago, a Portland representative told us the supply of summer water for us would depend on whether or not they got approval to use their wells. This is a very shaky source. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR LAKE OSWEGO ONLY Proiect date Est. Cost A. 12,000 L.F. of 24-inch pipe from Lake Oswego 2004 $1,480,781 Water Treatment Plant to Pacific Hwy. and Laurel St. B. There is no corresponding project for Lake Oswego C. 13,600 L.F. of 24-inch pipe from the existing 2004 $2,919,434 Clackamas River Intake & Pump Station to Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant D. Water Treatment Plant high service pumps 2004 $1,011,060 4 - 600 hp @ 4730 gpm each E. Clackamas River Intake pump station 2004 $410,743 3 - 300 hp @ 4860 gpm each F. Expand existing Water Treatment Plant to 2003 $2,843,605 sow 20 MGD capacity Total Expense 58.665.614 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR LAKE OSWEGO AND TIGARD WATER DISTRICT Proiect date Est. Cost A. 12,000 L.F. of 36-inch pipe from Lake Oswego 1992 $2,925,300 Water Treatment Plant to Pacific Hwy. and Laurel St. B. 6,100 L.F. of 30-inch pipe from State St. to 2004 $931,017 Iron Mtn. Blvd. and Fairway Rd. C. 13,600 L.F. of 30-inch pipe from the existing 1993 $3,427,070 Clackamas River Intake & Pump Station to Lake Oswego Water Treatment Plant Dl.Water Treatment Plant high service pumps 1994 $1,989,470 4 - 800 hp pumps @ 6370 gpm each D2.4000 L.F. of 16-inch pipe from new Willamette 2006 $506,583 River Intake and pump station to existing WTP `"' D3.Water Treatment Plant high service pumps 2000 $312,797 1 - 800 hp pump @ 6370 gpm El.New Clackamas River Intake and pump station 1992 $1,284,888 3 - 300 hp pumps @ 4860 gpm each E2.Existing Clackamas River Intake pump station 1996 $170,616 3 - 200 hp pumps @ 3910 gpm each E3.New Clackamas River Intake pump station 2001 $136,914 1 - 300 hp pump@ 4380 gpm F l.Expand existing Water Treatment Plant to 1993-94 $10,020,022 32 MGD capacity F2.New 5 MGD Willamette River Intake and Pump 2006 $958,400 Station F3.New 5 MGD Willamette River WTP 2005 $8,067,412 Total Expense $30.730.489 05/24/93 11:30 'x`503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 4002/003 MEMORANDUM CITY OF TI GARD, OREGON TO: Jeri Chennelle, Administrator - Tigard Water District FROM: Catherine Wheatley, City Recorder - Tigard DATE: May 21, 1993 SUBJECT: Per your request: 5/18/93 Council Meeting transcript concerning the Council's request to the Tigard Water District with regard to the Lake Oswego/Tigard Water District Contract Mayor: . .what I would like to, on my own behalf anyway, there has been enough question raised and especially some concerns that I have for the unincorporated area and, if there is any possibility at all, I would certainly hope that the Water District would hold off for just a short period at least and let this joint water agency maybe get together, work out some of the details in the agreements that we've been hearing about this evening and let that new agency make this final determination and decision. If not, I really have some doubts and concerns about what might happen if it goes ahead and is signed and I certainly would like to be on the record anyway that I would not want the new agency to have to take responsibility of what happens in the future, three or *ow four years, with regards to rate increases, water shortages, management or anything. Because I think that the new agency is going to be inheriting anything that is there or anything that you do. And, I would hope that you would consider at least waiting another 30 days and letting that new board work on this issue. That's my own personal views. . . Councilor Schwartz: I'm sort of curious. How do the cities of Durham and King City feel about. . .whether they're comfortable with this or not. . .and. . .I'd recommend the Water District not sign agreement. . .until the new entity is in place or at least until we have had an opportunity to meet with the other cities. . . Councilor Fessler: I agree, and I think it's really important in this interim. . .to get as much of a paper trail as we can with some interim agreement because, once again, if anything happened to any one of us, what would happen? . .kind of coming to the table and it's inferred. I think it does really need to be, as much as we can, down on paper and signed so that we now where it's being (one word - j_naudible) . 05/24/93 11:31 tr503 684 7297 CITY OF TIGARD 4003/003 Councilor Hunt: I think as long as our Council. . .there's a quiestion. . .whether we can actually be assignees on these contracts. I think by signing another one before the new board is in place is really opening a bag of snakes. I'd you like to see. . .held off. . . Councilor Hawley: I would echo. . .out of courtesy to the new joint water agency. . .future obligations. . .I would like the contract to be clear. . .intent for the obligation of the remnant district. (The tape recording for councilor Hawley's comments difficult to hear. My nates specify as follows: New joint water agency should have more say in determining future contracts. Councilor Hawley would like the contract to be clear; the intent should be made clear for the remnant district. ) cwc0521.93 'Wrrw (N - 06/01/93 PERIOD 11 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT PAGE 1 BUDGET REPORT GENERAL FUND MAY 31, 1993 ACCT DESCRIPTION CURRENT PERIOD YEAR TO DATE NO ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE XXX 9999 BEGINNING WORKING CAPITAL 2331438.68 1472021.00 (859417.68) 2027768.76 1952000.00 (75768.76) INCOME GF40-4000/5 WATER SALES 208017.58 217400.00 9382.42 2542731.57 2866500.00 323768.43 GF 40-4010 FIRE SVC STANDBY CHG 1245.50 1500.00 254.50 22760.75 24000.00 1239.25 GF 40-4015 BACKFLOW MAINT CHG .00 2500.00 2500.00 620.00 27500.00 26880.00 GF 40-4060/5 METER SALES 36930.00 10000.00 (26930.00) 304054.12 166800.00 (137254.12) GF 40-4101 DEVELOPER'S-l0a OVERHEAD .00 6200.00 6200.00 104351.83 67800.00 (36551.83) GF 40-4102 DEVELOPER'S-8a ENGINEERING .00 1200.00 1200.00 18120.36 13200.00 (4920.36) GF 40-4103 DEVELOPER'S-TWD EQUIPMENT .00 150.00 150.00 .00 1650.00 1650.00 GF 40-4104 DEVELOPER'S-WAGE REIMBURSE .00 200.00 200.00 .00 2200.00 2200.00 OF 40-4200 LINE EXTENSION REBATES .00 1500.00 1500.00 3575.00 16500.00 12925.00 , GF 40-4300 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 14.38 1000.00 985.62 4827.08 11000.00 6172.92 GF 40-4400 INTEREST INCOME 6963.59 8000.00 1036.41 79678.00 88000.00 8322.00 GF40-4500/10 PENALTIES\LATE PAY-CK RET'D 125.00 100.00 (25.00) 776.00 1100.00 324.00 GF 40-4600 SALE OF EQUIPMENT .00 .00 .00 1710.00 133800.00 132090.00 GF 40-4700 RENTAL INCOME 250.00 500.00 250.00 3951.00 5500.00 1549.00 11110 TOTAL INCOME & WORKING CAPITAL 2584984.73 1722271.00 (862713.73) 5114924.47 5377550.00 262625.53 EXPENSES: PERSONAL SERVICES GF50-5000/40 EXECUTIVE SALARIES 17587.01 22806.00 5218.99 232417.48 247210.00 14792.52 GF50-5100/80 OFFICE EMPLOYEES 7195.70 7216.00 20.30 78772.44 78835.00 32.56 GF 5200/5310 FIELD EMPLOYEES 23535.23 25388.00 1852.77 272916.27 275072.00 2155.73 GF50-5350/60 FIELD LABOR & OTHER OFFICE 1799.13 5500.00 3700.87 24552.17 63500.00 38947.83 OF 50-5400 OVERTIME 2096.02 2500.00 403.98 23090.72 28002.00 4911.28 OF 50-5500/1 MEDICAL VISION & DENTAL INS 5783.65 7650.00 1866.35 61456.72 82350.00 20893.28 GF 50-5510 SOCIAL SECURITY 3239.09 4000.00 760.91 38197.67 44000.00 5802.33 GF 50-5520 AMERITAS LIFE - RETIREMENT .00 .00 .00 53988.56 58000.00 4011.44 GF 50-5530 MEDICARE TAXES 757.53 1000.00 242.47 9262.12 11000.00 1737.88 GF 50-5540 STATE ACCIDENT INS. FUND .00 .00 .00 8185.60 13500.00 5314.40 GF 50-5550 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE .00 .00 .00 6784.50 900.00 (5884.50) OF 50-5560 MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE/STD/LTD 787.38 950.00 162.62 8302.59 9250.00 947.41 GF 50-5570 TRI-MET TAXES .00 .00 .00 2347.94 2100.00 (247.94) 62780.74 77010.00 14229.26 820274.78 913689.00 93414.22 EXPENSES: MATERIAL & SERVICES ills. GF 51-6000 WATER COSTS-L.0. & PORTLAND 71428.00 142000.00 70572.00 810341.63 1190000.00 379658.37 GF 51-6050 WATER COSTS-ELECTRICITY ETC 5478.88 11500.00 6021.12 84764.13 126500.00 41735.87 GF 51-6060 WATER COSTS - SAMPLING 86.00 1000.00 914.00 7629.50 11000.00 3370.50 OF51-6100/30 REPAIRS & MAINT - LINES ETC 898.08 8300.00 7401.92 45704.64 91600.00 45895.36 GF51-6140/55 REPAIRS & MAINT-BLDGS/EQUIP 339.00 700.00 361.00 11163.39 7700.00 (3463.39) �1 I, I 06/01/93 PERIOD 11 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT PAGE 2 BUDGET REPORT GENERAL FUND MAY 31, 1993 ACCT DESCRIPTION CURRENT PERIOD YEAR TO DATE NO ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE GF51-6160/70 REPAIRS & MAINT-METERS, ETC 921.12 3400.00 2478.88 16457.22 36700.00 20242.78 GF51-6180/95 REPAIRS & MAINT-FH/BF/FS/SS 976.17 3200.00 2223.83 17399.04 34400.00 17000.96 GF 51-6200 REPAIRS & MAINT - TRK/EQUIP 2940.77 1500.00 (1440.771 16354.43 16500.00 145.57 GF 51-6210 GASOLINE/DIESEL/OIL 2477.75 1700.00 (777.75) 12306.40 18400.00 6093.60 GF 51-6220 TIRES & BATTERIES 382.20 500.00 117.80 797.16 5500.00 4702.84 GF 51-6250 SMALL TOOLS 572.33 500.00 (72.33) 4727.88 5500.00 772.12 GF 51-6300 GENERAL INSURANCE 487.05 200.00 (287.05) 36137.73 28000.00 18137.73) GF51-6320/50 PROFESSIONAL FEES 18630.60 9850.00 (8780.60) 36391.89 119750.00 83358.11 GF51-6400/20 OFFICE SUPPLIES & EXPENSES 3787.71 4500.00 712.29 55369.15 55500.00 130.85 GF51-6430/70 UTILITIES, ETC 2654.99 3000.00 345.01 27371.71 33000.00 5628.29 GF 51-6480 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS (21.68) 800.00 821.68 10159.79 9200.00 (959.79) GF 51-6490/5 ADS/ELECTIONS/CONSERVATION 4737.75 450.00 (4287.75) 15578.99 17550.00 1971.01 GF51-6500/30 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 1586.90 1500.00 (86.90) 15585.38 16500.00 914.62 GF 51-6600 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 72.34 100.00 27.66 738.50 1100.00 361.50 GF 51-6720 SAFETY-PROGRAMS/EQUIP/EDUC 176.00 900.00 724.00 5988.30 9200.00 3211.70 GF 51-6530/5 JANITORIAL SPLY & RAIN GEAR 1231.38 1450.00 218.62 16502.84 15950.00 (552.84) GF51-6800/50 EMPLOYEE TRAINING EXPENSE 219.63 2100.00 1880.37 13883.92 23100.00 9216.08 GF 51-6900 RENTAL PROPERTY EXPENSES .00 200.00 200.00 .00 4600.00 4600.00 GF 51-6950 INTEREST EXPENSE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 120062.97 199350.00 79287.03 1261353.62 1877250.00 615896.38 EXPENSES: CAPITAL OUTLAY GF 52-7100 BUILDINGS & ADDITIONS 855.00 .00 (855.00) 4224.01 61800.00 57515.99 GF52-7200/10 LINE & METER REPLACEMENTS .00 2000.00 2000.00 422.52 22000.00 21577.48 GF52-7300/20 METER, ETC. INSTALLATIONS 4785.47 6100.00 1314.53 106074.67 66900.00 (39174.67) GF52-7410/30 EQUIPMENT 21488.08 2100.00 (19388.08) 167503.04 319000.00 151496.96 GF 52-7500 PIPELINE EXTENSIONS 7322.31 47700.00 40317.69 59191.76 290900.00 231708.24 GF 52-7510 FIRE HYDRANTS .00 500.00 500.00 .00 5500.00 5500.00 GF 52-7520 BACKFLOW DEVICE INSTALL .00 100.00 100.00 .00 1100.00 1100.00 GF 52-7600 LAND & IMPROVEMENTS .00 1500.00 1500.00 1674.00 133500.00 131826.00 34450.86 60000.00 25549.14 339090.00 900700.00 561610.00 GF 53-8000 OPERATING CONTINGENCY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 GF 54-9000 TRANSFER TO BOND SINKING .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 GF 54-9100 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECT .00 .00 .00 300000.00 300000.00 .00 NET FUND BALANCE 2367690.16 1385911.00 (981779.16) 2394206.07 1385911.00 (1008295.07) TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 2584984.73 1722271.00 (862113.73) 5114924.47 5377550.00 262625.53 -_ lime INVENTORY BALANCE FOR MONTH 11581.16 .00 (11581.16) 102420.97 .00 (102420.97) 06/01/93 PERIOD 11 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT PAGE 1 MONTHLY REPORT 1110 BOND SINKING FUND MAY 31, 1993 ACCT DESCRIPTION CURRENT PERIOD YEAR TO DATE NO ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE BSF 10-1030 CASH BALANCE 1st OF PERIOD 50.00 50.00 .00 50.00 50.00 .00 BSF 10-1080 INVESTED MONIES 1stOF PERIOD 18033.41 2302.00 (15731.41) 40391.35 32950.00 (7441.35) INCOME BSF 40-4120 TAXES - CURRENT 877.57 700.00 (177.57) 129717.02 126950.00 (2767.02) BSF 40-4130 TAXES - DELINQUENT 466.42 400.00 (66.42) 8433.97 4200.00 (4233.97) BSF 40-4150 TAXES - LAND SALES & TIMBER .00 .00 .00 7.00 .00 (7.00) BSF 40-4160 HOUSING AUTH/RENT % LIEU TAXES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 BSF 40-4180 INTEREST - INVESTED MONIES 62.92 200.00 137.08 1291.72 1800.00 508.28 BSF 40-4190 INTEREST - PROPERTY TAXES 19.36 .00 (19.36) 372.51 .00 (372.51) BSF 40-4300 TRANSFER-IN FROM GENERAL FUND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRANSFER FROM INVESTED MONIES .00 .00 .00 (1875.00) 162298.00 164173.00 1426.27 1300.00 (126.27) 137947.22 295248.00 157300.78 1110 EXPENDITURES BSF 50-5850 BOND PRINCIPAL .00 .00 .00 130000.00 130000.00 .00 BSF 50-5860 BOND INTEREST .00 .00 .00 32297.50 32298.00 .50 TRANSFER TO INVESTED MONIES 1426.27 1300.00 (126.27) (9332.58) 132950.00 142282.58 ( 1426.27 1300.00 (126.27) 152964.92 295248.00 142283.08 V 1 1 CASH BALANCE END OF PERIOD 50.00 50.00 .00 50.00 50.00 .00 INVESTED MONIES END OF PERIOD 19459.68 3602.00 (15857.68) 32933.77 3602.00 (29331.77) ( a 19509.68 3652.00 (15857.68) 32983.77 3652.00 (29331.77) 1 i I 06/01/93 PERIOD 11 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT PAGE 1 MONTHLY REPORT Ilw•,✓ SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FUND MAY 31, 1993 ACCT DESCRIPTION CURRENT PERIOD YEAR TO DATE NO ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE SDF 10-1100 INVESTED MONIES 1st OF PERIOD 394252.29 302500.00 (91752.29) 69700.67 8800.00 (60900.67) SDF 10-1200 RECEIVABLES 1st OF PERIOD 20051.00 11250.00 (8801.00) 22860.00 .00 (22860.00) INCOME SDF 40-4000 SYS DEV CHG REVENUE 46990.00 18000.00 (28990.00) 395263.75 301200.00 (94063.75) SDF 40-4100 INTEREST INCOME 1377.16 350.00 (1027.16) 9922.03 3850.00 (6072.03) TRANSFER FROM INVESTED MONIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 48367.16 18350.00 (30017.16) 405185.78 305050.00 (100135.78) EXPENDITURES 1600 SDF 50-5000 PIPELINE EXTENSIONS - SYS DEV .00 .00 .00 35076.00 .00 (35076.00) SDF 50-5100 LAND PURCHASES - SYS DEV .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 SDF 50-5900 DEPRECIATION EXPENSES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TRANSFER TO INVESTED MONIES 21428.16 16250.00 (5178.16) 345979.78 309950.00 (36029.78) 21428.16 16250.00 (5178.16) 381055.78 309950.00 (71105.78) INVESTED MONIES END OF PERIOD 415680.45 318750.00 (96930.45) 415680.45 318750.00 (96930.45) RECEIVABLES END OF PERIOD 46990.00 13350.00 (33640.00) 82066.00 (4900.00) (86966.00) 462670.45 332100.00 (130570.45) 497746.45 313850.00 (183896.45) 06/01/93 PERIOD 11 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT PAGE 1 '1/4111MONTHLY REPORT CAPTIAL PROJ. RESERVE FUND 13 MAY 31, 1993 ACCT DESCRIPTION CURRENT PERIOD YEAR TO DATE NO ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE INVESTED MONIES 1ST OF PERIOD 311238.86 315000.00 3761.14 .00 .00 .00 INCOME CPRF 40-4200 INTEREST INCOME/INVESTED MONEY 1037.81 1500.00 462.19 12276.67 16500.00 4223.33 CPRF 40-4500 TRANSFER IN FROM GENERAL FUND .00 .00 .00 300000.00 300000.00 .00 1037.81 1500.00 462.19 312276.67 316500.00 4223.33 EXPENDITURES CPRF 50-5500 EXPENDITURES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 kid .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 INVESTED MONIES END OF PERIOD 312276.67 316500.00 4223.33 312276.67 316500.00 4223.33 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT MAY 31, 1993 WELL RECORDS: WELL HOURS COSTS-ELECT NO OFF CUBIC FEET PUMPS,ETC. HOURS DESCRIPTION 1 T/OFF 10/30/92 $ 643.49 Well,Canterbury Shop and Pressure Pumps 2 T/OFF 10/30/92 $ 1,015.16 Well and Pumps to Hi-Tor& 10 MR Reservoir 3 T/OFF 09/30/92 $ 58.19 Well and Lights 4 T/OFF $ 10.63 Well and Lights All Pump Stations&Alarm-Telemetry Phones $ 3.751.41 132 St.,Hi-Tor,& 10-MG Reservoirs $ 5.478.88 METER RECORDS: METER#11,248 THROUGH#11,314 = 67 METERS SOLD BILLING DETAIL: MAY $ 209,533.95 DELINQUENT $ 4,387.37 14,055,700 CUBIC FEET OF WATER BILLED. TIGARD WATER DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS *ft. KEY BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT#09 11624 4 May 1,through 31, 1993 GENERAL FUND CHECK# VENDOR# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT# 41775 002000 Turner,Yvonne M.-Final Pay Check 1,247.16 2050 41776 002000 Yvonne M.Turner-Ded. Reimb. 43.20 2010 41777 002300 Toedtemeier, Patricia A.-Ded. Reimb. 330.72 2010 41778 003200 Clancy, Brian D.-Ded. Reimb. 84.84 2010 41779 010140 Advantage Business Forms 89.30 2010 41780 010230 Alpha Computers, Inc. 12.00 2010 41781 010380 Anderson&Dittman 139.50 2010 41782 010450 Applied Information Services 294.50 2010 41783 010470 Aratex Services Inc. 379.23 2010 41784 010720 ADT of Portland Region, Inc. 102.60 2010 41785 010800 Auto Wheel Service Inc. 67.30 2010 41786 020025 Battery Factory#2 82.27 2010 (4300) 41787 020070 Bretthauer Oil Co. 1,172.43 2010 41788 020075 Brewed Hot Coffee 198.40 2010 41789 030011 Calls Unlimited, Inc. 61.30 2010 41790 030100 Cessco, Inc. 369.51 2010 41791 030135 Clackamas Community College 150.00 2010 41792 030145 Clark Lumber&Hardware 85.63 2010 (4300) 41793 030190 Consolidated Supply Co 660.88 2010 41794 040070 Delta Fire Inc. 16.50 2010 41795 050090 The Economics Press Inc. 60.35 2010 41796 050250 Elmo Studd's Building Supplies 142.90 2010 41797 060010 Familian Northwest Inc. 7,483.50 2010 41798 060040 Flowers by Donna 28.00 2010 41799 060045 Fortis Benefits 787.38 2010 41800 060050 Frahler Electric Co. 419.01 2010 41801 070072 The Goldsmith Co. 420.50 2010 41802 070100 Grabhorn Inc. 23.04 2010 41803 070300 Grimm's Fuel Co. 74.00 2010 41804 080010 Halton Tractor Co. 210.40 2010 41805 120009 Lake Oswego Blueprint 10.89 2010 41806 120010 City of Lake Oswego 73,950.00 2010 41807 120045 Lane Powell Spears Lubersky 114.35 2010 41808 120065 Lazerquick Copies 82.30 2010 41809 120080 Les Schwab Tire Center 33.50 2010 41810 140080 Minuteman Press 157.50 2010 41811 140100 Morse Bros. 619.04 2010 41812 150024 Nessco Supply Inc. 125.65 2010 41813 150032 Nine-T-Nine Towing 96.25 2010 41814 170050 P.H.&L.-Medical/Dental/Vision 5,239.05 2010 41815 170150 Pacific Safety Supply 2,231.00 2010 41816 170180 Pacific Utility Equipment Co. 47.52 2010 41817 170300 Petty Cash 154.21 2010 41818 170360 Plantic Services NW, Inc. 92.97 2010 Nor, 41819 170440 Portland Water Bureau 258.24 2010 41820 170550 Power Rents, Inc. 42.10 2010 Page 1 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS Now KEY BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT#09 11624 4 May 1,through 31, 1993 GENERAL FUND CHECK# VENDOR# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT# 41821 192250 Russ Chevrolet 238.21 2010 41822 200070 Southwest Office Supply 10.97 2010 41823 200112 Steelco Inc. 64.20 2010 (4300) 41824 200130 Sunset Office Outfitters, Inc. 30.12 2010 41825 210036 Things Remembered 196.20 2010 41826 210120 Tigard Sand&Gravel Co., Inc. 394.69 2010 (4300) 41827 210155 TWD-Payroll Account 23,850.46 2010 41828 210500 Tualatin Valley Farm Supply, Inc. 126.00 2010 41829 220008 Unified Sewerage Agency of Wash.Co. 48.00 2010 41830 240010 Wash.Co. Federal Credit Union 1,636.00 2010 41831 240020 Washington County Finance Dept. 2,463.07 2010 41832 240060 Water, Food, & Research Lab Inc. 567.00 2010 41833 240100 Watt Welding Supply 114.14 2010 41834 240167 Western Power&Equipment 558.03 2010 41835 VOIDED-Computer Total Page --- 41836 001100 Johnson, Nancy L. -Ded. Reimb. 133.04 2010 41837 003500 Wyant, James E.-Ded. Reimb. 76.33 2010 41838 003700 Tesky, Lynn E.-Ded. Reimb. 25.06 2010 41839 020060 Bolliger&Sons, Inc. 487.05 2010 41840 030150 Cobb Rock,%Lone Star 4,101.35 2010 *'"" 41841 030186 Community Newspapers Inc. 373.10 2010 41842 040040 DeAngelo's Catering 256.00 2010 41843 040200 DSU--Peterbilt&GMC, Inc. 1,991.28 2010 41844 060060 Frank Business Solutions, Inc. 560.00 2010 41845 070050 Geo.A. Morlan Plumbing Co. 22.45 2010 41846 070060 GTE Northwest Inc. 843.45 2010 41847 140065 Mike's Lock&Safe, Inc. 19.70 2010 41848 160020 Office Depot 40.78 2010 41849 170015 PSI/Farnes 100.80 2010 41850 180030 Quality Door Service 2,950.00 2010 41851 210045 City of Tigard-Sewer Department 485.00 2010 41852 230040 Valley Yard Supply, Inc. 15.00 2010 41853 VOIDED-Computer Total Page --- 41854 002000 Turner,Yvonne M.-Ded. Reimb. 46.96 2010 41855 002100 Winchester, Stephen E. -Ded. Reimb. 75.88 2010 41856 003100 Morrison, Samuel P.-Ded. Reimb. 148.40 2010 41857 003200 Clancy, Brian D.-Ded. Reimb. 34.40 2010 41858 003600 Earner,Clark D.-Ded. Reimb. 43.20 2010 41859 003700 Tesky, Lynn E.-Ded. Reimb. 70.60 2010 41860 010125 Ad--Mail Inc. 427.20 2010 41861 020045 Big A Auto Parts 201.22 2010 41862 030186 Community Newspapers Inc. 185.65 2010 41863 090019 IMM Publications 187.50 2010 41864 110025 Key Bank of Oregon 19.10 2010 41865 160010 OTS Wire&Insulation Inc. 616.44 2010 Now 41866 170200 Pacific Water Works Supply Co., Inc. 332.47 2010 Page 2 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS °%w KEY BANK CHECKING ACCOUNT#09 11624 4 May 1,through 31, 1993 GENERAL FUND CHECK# VENDOR# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT# 41867 VOIDED- Printer Ate Check --- 41868 VOIDED-Printer Ate Check --- 41869 170300 Petty Cash 118.06 2010 41870 170445 Portland Bureau of Water 15,000.00 2010 41871 170540 Postmaster- Permit Mail 850.00 2010 41872 210050 Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce 240.00 2010 41873 210155 TWD- Payroll Account 23,281.70 2010 41874 240010 Wash. Co. Federal Credit Union 1,636.00 2010 41875 VOIDED-Computer Total Page --- 41876 010700 Augustine&Co.Computer Assoc. 6,496.00 2010 41877 200067 Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 530.00 2010 41878 VOIDED-Computer Total Page --- 41879 003200 Clancy, Brian D. -Ded. Reimb. 35.30 2010 41880 030186 Community Newspapers Inc. 25.90 2010 41881 040020 Davis Wright Tremaine Law Offices 2,763.60 2010 41882 090025 Independent Cleaning Contractors, Inc. 441.00 2010 41883 110450 Kupferle Foundry Co. 14.91 2010 41884 150040 Northwest Natural Gas Co. (Op. Center) 239.47 2010 41885 160052 Olsten Staffing Services 252.00 2010 41886 170255 ALPAC Corp. (Pepsi-Cola Bottling) 66.00 2010 Now 41887 170300 Petty Cash 57.85 2010 41888 220080 One Call Concept Inc. 349.75 2010 41889 VOIDED-Computer Total Page --- 41890 005100 Barrett, Claudine B.-Draw 50.00 6500 41891 VOIDED-Computer Total Page --- Total May, 1993 Checks $196,104.96 `Wroe Page 3 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS '- KEY BANK PAYROLL CHECKING ACCOUNT#09 11624 4 May 1, through 31, 1993 PAYROLL CHECK# VOUCHER# VENDOR# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT# 433 5100 Claudine B. Barrett $486.65 5360 434 1300 Michael J. Miller 925.64 5030 435 5200 John C. Dixon 392.34 5350 436 4000 Cheryl A. Huegli 499.22 5310 437 3100 Sam P. Morrison 956.31 5200, 5400 438 3400 John A. Powell 477.20 5290 439 3700 Lynn E. Tesky 621.74 5270 440 3000 Russell A. Thomas 934.98 5220, 5400 441 3900 Michael H. White 960.52 5240, 5400 180001 1001 Jeri L. Chenelle 1,443.71 5005 180002 1400 Lorry Christian 801.89 5040 180003 1100 Nancy L. Johnson 806.67 5020, 5400 180004 2200 Diane F. Kuhn 211.86 5120 180005 2300 Patricia A. Toedtemeier 312.94 5140 180006 2000 Yvonne M. Turner 533.28 5100 180007 1200 Randy J. Volk 1,217.69 5010 180008 2100 Stephen E. Winchester 47.87 5180 180009 3300 Brian D. Clancy 580.56 5250 5400 180010 3600 Clark D. Farrier 537.43 5300 "liar 180011 3300 Richard C. Sattler 718.38 5210 180012 3800 Samuel I. Schultz 439.83 5280 180013 3500 James E.Wyant 816.46 5245 5400 XX X9VE ADP Federal/State Tax Pay 8,372.29 Impound YY Y9VE Direct Savings Deposit 755.00 AutoDeposit Pay Date 05/06/93 $23,850.46 442 5100 Claudine B. Barrett 300.50 5360 5400 443 1300 Michael J. Miller 925.64 5030 444 4000 Cheryl A. Huegli 499.23 5310 445 3100 Samuel P. Morrison 1,236.11 5200 5400 446 3400 John A. Powell 627.39 5290 5400 447 3700 Lynn E. Tesky 450.59 5270 5400 448 3000 Russell A. Thomas 905.87 5220 449 3900 Michael H. White 903.18 5240 5400 200001 1001 Jeri L. Chenelle 1,444.71 5005 200002 1400 Lorry Christian 801.91 5040 200003 1100 Nancy L. Johnson 977.42 5020 5400 200004 2200 Diane F. Kuhn 211.57 5120 200005 2300 Patricia A. Toedtemeier 279.89 5140 200006 1200 Randy J. Volk 1,217.71 5010 200007 2100 Stephen E. Winchester 63.97 5180 200008 3200 Brian D. Clancy 396.46 5250 Now Page 1 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS KEY BANK PAYROLL CHECKING ACCOUNT#09 11624 4 May 1, through 31, 1993 PAYROLL CHECK# VOUCHER# VENDOR# VENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT# 200009 3600 Clark D. Farrier 537.43 5300 200010 3300 Richard C. Sattler 744.30 5210 200011 3800 Samuel I. Schultz 470.45 5280 5400 200012 3500 James E. Wyant 643.00 5245 XX X9VE ADP Federal/State Tax Pay 8,889.37 Impound YY Y9VE Direct Savings Deposit 755.00 AutoDeposit Pay Date 04/22/93 $23,281.70 CHECKING ACCOUNT RECAP 04/30/93 Check Book Balance $528.50 05/06/93 P/R Cash Transfer 23,850.46 05/06/93 P/R & Impound Paid (23,850.46) 05/19/93 P/R Cash Transfer 23,281.70 05/20/93 P/R &Impound Paid (23,281.70) 05/31/93 Interest Credited 2.24 05/31/93 BALANCE $530.74 Page 2 Work Accomplished in May a. TWD cut-in a 12" butterfly valve; 12" x 6" tee; installed a 6" gate valve and 40 feet of 6" D.1. pipe to begin the fireline project for the new Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue Station. b. TWD removed the fencing on our property behind the new Fire District station building. c. TWD to repair the manhole rings to the control vault at the 10 MG terminal reservoir site. d. TWD to install a 8" master meter for Tualatin View Apartments located in the City of Durham, east of SW Boones Ferry Road next to the Tualatin River. e. TWD installed a 2" irrigation service and water meter at the Oakmont apartments located on SW Beef Bend Road just west of Barrington Heights. f. TWD finished the clean-up and asphalt work along SW Sunrise Lane west of SW 150th Avenue. g. TWD replaced a non-operational fire hydrant with a Modern Mueller Centurion fire hydrant located on SW Ironwood Loop. h. TWD installed two (2) 3/4" water services; removed one (1) 3/4" water service; and adjusted another 3/4" water service on SW Omara Street just north of SW McDonald Street. i. TWD construction crew performed ground maintenance and lawn mowing duties during May and into June until the summer crews begin work. j. TWD repaired/replaced three (3) 5/8" x 3/4" water meters and four(4) meter boxes that were broken during May. k. TWD installed three (3) special 3/4" regulators for high pressure problems and replaced three (3) 3/4 pressure regulators that were defective. 1. TWD installed 52- 5/8" x 3/4" water meters; two (2) 1" water meters; and one (1) 1 1/2" water meter during the month of May. �O Q . . Work Accomplished in May by Private Contractor a. Private contractor began installing 1,000 feet of 8" D.I. pipe to serve Bull Mountain Meadows, phase 2 with water from the 713 pressure zone. This work should be completed during June along with the 1,300 feet of 12" D.I. pipe across the Water District property south of SW Scholls Ferry Road. Work to be Accomplished in June a. TWD to install the remaining 400 feet of 6" D.I. pipe and two (2) fire hydrants to serve the new Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Station 221. This is a joint venture project to contain costs related to improving our property along the railroad tracks and at the same time saving the Fire District some money. b. TWD to install new fencing and begin grading work on our property behind the new Fire District station building. c. TWD to repair the manhole rings to the control vault at the 10 MG terminal reservoir site. d. TWD continued its program of flushing dead end lines, adjusting valve boxes to finish grade, and exercising the main line valves. e. Private contractor for the District to demolish the rental house and barn on the District property located south of SW Scholls Ferry Road off of SW Menlor Lane. This work is in preparation for the new 2.5 MG reservoir scheduled to be built in FY 95-96. f Private contractor to have the SCADA system installed and on line before the end of June. Work to be Accomplished in June by Private Contractors a. Private Contractor to finish installing 1,300 feet of 12" D.I. pipe and 1,000 feet of 8" D.I. pipe from SW Sunrise Lane west across the Water District's property to Bull Mountain Meadows, phase 2. This water main is to supply water from the 713 zone until such time that the 1.0 million gallon reservoir at elevation 470' is built on the District's property. This reservoir will be constructed after the 2.5 million gallon reservoir at elevation 410' is built on this same property. b. Private contractor to install 1,730 feet of 6" D.I. pipe, and two (2) fire hydrants to serve 23 single family residences located south of SW 103rd Avenue and west of SW 100th Avenue (Marion Estates). c. Private Contractor to lower 296 feet of 16" D.I. pipe; install 60 feet of 8" D.I. pipe; install 110 feet of 6" D.I. pipe, and three (3) fire hydrants to serve a new commercial • •�, building located in the Forum Business Park south of SW Scholls Ferry Road on SW Nimbus Avenue (Synektron). Work to be Accomplished in July by Private Contractors a. Private contractor to install 75 feet of 6" D.I. pipe and one (1) fire hydrant to serve four single family residences located at the west end of SW Mountain View Lane off of SW 93rd Avenue (Brelynn Woods). b. Private contractor to install 320 feet of 6" D.I. pipe, and one (1) fire hydrant to serve a new Church located on SW North Dakota Street west of SW 109th Avenue (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints). c. Private contractor to install 170 feet of 8" D.I. pipe; 500 feet of 6" D.I. pipe; two (2) fire hydrants; and relocate one fire hydrant to serve 61 multi-family residential units located on the east side of SW Hall Blvd. north of SW McDonald Street(Fanno Creek Village Apartments). d. Private contractor to install 1,940 feet of 8" D.I. pipe; four(4) fire hydrants; and a 8" fire line to serve a new commercial warehouse located on SW Sequoia Parkway south — of SW Bonita Road(The Home Depot). e. Private contractor to install 200 feet of 8" D.I. pipe, a vault for a 8" master water meter, and a vault with a 8" Double Check Valve Assembly (DCVA) for a new 210 unit multi-family development located in the City of Durham east of SW Boones Ferry Road next to the Tualatin River(Tualatin View Apartments). • ' Percentage of each type of water consumed, FY 1991-92 Month & Well Clackamas R. Bull Run Total '.-" Year Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Jul1992 4,671,571 13,797,000 -0- 18,468,571 Aug 1992 4,717,910 15,955,000 -0- 20,672,910 Sep 1992 4,618,960 12,730,000 -0- 17,348,960 Oct 1992 3,685,550 12,366,000 -0- 16,051,550 Nov 1992 -0- 16,186,000 -0- 16,186,000 Dec 1992 -0- 15,245,000 100 15,245,100 Jan 1993 -0- 17,199,000 -0- 17,199,000 Feb 1993 -0- 12,397,000 200 12,397,200 Mar 1993 -0- 16,607,000 400 16,607,400 Apr1993 -0- 14,790,000 100 14,790,100 May 1993 -0- 14,238,000 -0- 14,238,000 Jun 1993 Total 17,693,991 161,510,000 800 179,204,791 9.87% 90.13% -0-% 100% Unmetered water, FY 1991-92 Pumped Purchased Total Sold Loss * Month Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Loss No. & Year x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 % May -0- 14,238(L.O.) 14,238 14,100 138 .97% 1993 -0-(Pt1d1 _ Total: 17.694 161.511 179.205 179.820 (615) (.341% (11 Months) *Monthly water losses are not accurate. Billing is accomplished every month,with one-half of the patrons billed for a 2-month period of water pumped/purchased computed on a monthly basis. Summary of water purchased and/or pumped and water losses Fiscal Year Well Lake Oswego Portland Water Losses 1986-87 0% 96% 4% 10.5% 1 1987-88 0% 97% 3% 3.9% 1988-89 3% 93% 4% 7.9% 8.81% avg. 1989-90 6% 90% 4% 6.05% 1990-91 5% 90% 5% 9.0% 1991-92 7% 89% 4% 15.5% i 1992-93 10% 90% -0-% (.34)% ',ow- (11 Months)