Budget Message BUDGET MESSAGE
FY 1978-79
TIGARD WATER DISTRICT
During the present fiscal year the water district
has been on the accrual versus cash basis in its account-
ing and budgetary method. This method of accounting
commenced on July 1, 1975 and employs the generally
accepted principles for an operating utility enterprise.
The accrual method of accounting will again be utilized
for the new fiscal year 1978-79, beginning July 1, 1978.
The financial policies of the water district will
remain essentially the same as in past years.
Prior to submitting a proposed budget it would be
appropriate to review the major decisions and accom-
plishments of the past fiscal year. Significant events
have occurred which make this year' s (1977-78) budget
look like a disaster area. In the preparation of the
budget last April there was every indication that the
financial status of the water district would be out-
standing. One member of the budget committee even sug-
gested that water rates by reduced. Unfortunately, two
specific events occurred during the year which changed
the situation drastically. These were:
(1) . A decision on October 4 , 1977 by the Court of
Appeals to reverse a favorable decision by the Circuit
Court on the water district' s lawsuit with the City of
-1-
BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued)
Lake Oswego over wholesale water rates. Subsequently,
the Oregon State Supreme Court refused to hear the case,
thereby exhausting all avenues of appeal. The case was
lost. Consequently, retroactive payments, plus interest,
from July 1, 1975, totaling $272,100 had to be derived
from this year' s budgeted funds (General Fund) . The
district' s total annual budget is about $1 million, so
one can readily imagine the severe impact upon the finan-
cial status of the district. In addition, since these
liabilities and charges were not budgeted for in FY 1976-77 ,
the auditor' s report for that period expressed a "qualified"
opinion as to the financial position of the district.
(2). As a result of the unusual drought conditions
lto-
last year, and the subsequent declaration by elected offi-
cials to conserve water, income from water sales increased
by only 3% versus the normal 12% to 25% . Since income from
water sales constitutes over half the revenue of the dis-
trict, the conservation program had a deleterious effect
upon anticipated revenues. (This is not to say that con-
servation methods should not be encouraged) .
While these events have had an adverse effect upon the
district' s financial position, the over-all status of the
district is not that grim. In other words , the district
has enough flexibility to absorb such set-backs, and still
*4w achieve the goals and objectives established. Some of the
brighter achievements during the past year are listed as
follows :
-2-
BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued)
a. Storage:
Completion of a 10-MG reservoir which will meet the
needs of the district until about 1990.
b. Distribution:
The pipeline replacement program continued on schedule
and should essentially be finished within the next year.
The entire distribution system will consist of either cast
or ductile iron pipelines with excellent pressures through-
out the system.
C. Source:
Elected officials representing six different govern-
mental bodies, including Tigard Water District, are meeting
monthly for the purpose of considering a proposal to jointly
develop the Willamette River at Wilsonville as a source of
water. Within 6 months a decision should be reached whether
to proceed with such a venture. Other alternatives could
include a "buy-in" to the City of Lake Oswego (Clackamas
River) system or continued purchases of surplus water from
the City of Portland (Bull Run) .
The proposed budget recommends no increase in consumer
user rates or meter connection charges. These rates and
charges were last increased in April 1975.
It is proposed that the advalorem tax rate remain the
same at 424 per $1, 000 assessed valuation. It is emphasized
-3-
BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued)
that actual dollars to be paid by each patron (property
owner) may not be the same because of the continual in-
crease in assessed valuation of real property. Because
of this, the actual amount to be received from taxes will
be about $160, 000, an increase of $25,400. These funds,
together with the remaining balance in the Bond Sinking
Fund, and a transfer of $156, 000 from the General Fund,
will be earmarked for payment of bonded indebtedness
which will total $3, 018, 000 on June 30, 1978 . Thus ,
funds needed to pay the annual premiums for bonded in-
debtedness will be shared about equally between taxes
and user fees. Because the General Obligation bond
issues, and resultant taxation authority, were previously
approved by the patrons at the polls, there is no require-
ment to acquire voter approval to request the necessary
taxes to balance the budget.
It is noted that the amount of taxes to be generated
this year is derived "backwards" since limits have been
imposed on the district. During the solicitation of the
$1. 9 million bond measure in May 1976, the Board of Com-
missioners pledged that there would be no increase in the
tax rate if the bond measure passed at the polls. (This
established a maximum figure) . On the other hand, as one
studies the budget document, it becomes obvious that the
district needs every available tax dollar to balance the
budget. (This establishes a minimum figure) . (Ergo:
42G per $1, 000 assessed valuation) .
-4-
BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued)
There is a bright note about the district' s bonded
indebtedness. Commencing in November 1979 , and each sub-
sequent 3 years thereafter, the first of several bond
issues will mature and be liquidated. This will take a
substantial burden off annual budgets in the future.
The proposed budget will be austere with no frills.
It becomes apparent that rate increases will be necessary
next year if the district is to remain solvent. It is
recommended that the staff make an in-depth study of all
sources of revenue, including user rates, meter charges ,
out-of-district rates, etc. An effective date of April
20 , 1979 for the rate increases is considered realistic
and the public should be so alerted.
Our patrons still enjoy the lowest water rates of all
adjacent water districts and cities, except Portland, as
shown below:
Average Monthly Water Bill*
Portland. . . . . . . . . . . $ 4 . 60
Tigard Water Dist. . 8. 04
**Metzger Water Dist. 8 . 39
I **Lake Oswego. . . . . . . . 10. 21
Tualatin. . . . . . . . . . . 11. 89
Lake Grove W.D. . . . . 14 . 80
* Includes taxes ($40 ,000 home)
** Have held public hearings to increase water rates.
Summarized preliminary budget documents for the General
Fund and Bond Construction Fund have been prepared for the
next fiscal year and are shown on the opposite side of this
folder. Supporting documents are also enclosed following
-5-
BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued)
this budget message. It is emphasized that the budget
document is a financial guide only, and when approved and
adopted, legally authorizes the Board of Commissioners to
expend funds in specific categories. It does not autho-
rize the staff to expend any funds. Approval of individual
appropriations is accomplished at regular monthly meetings
by the Board of Commissioners.
Following is a listing of the major items in the
budget:
GENERAL FUND
Income
Beginning Balance. . . . . . . $102 , 000 9%
Meter Installations. . . . . 264 ,800 24%
Water Sales. . . . . . . . . . . . . 691,800 61%
Miscellaneous. . . . . . . . . . 71, 400 6%
Total Income: $1,130 ,000 100%
i
Expenditures
Salaries & Fringes . . . . . . $ 334 , 200 30%
Water Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . 282, 500 25%
Meter Installations. . . . . 47 , 400 4%
Bond Sinking Fund. . . . . . . 156 , 000 14%
Miscellaneous. . . . . . . . . . . 207 ,900 18%
Ending Balance. . . . . . . . . 102 , 000 9%
i
Total Exp. : $1,130 , 000 100%
All remaining funds ($207 ,200) in the Bond Construc-
tion Fund will be expended during the upcoming fiscal year.
The Board of Commissioners has approved, and the em-
ployees have accepted, a 9% basic salary increase for the
next fiscal year. (The Consumer Price Index for the Port-
-6-
BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued)
land Metropolitan area is 8. 99%) . The employees of the
district are not unionized. Also approved, for inclusion
in the budget, is the purchase of a new dump truck and the
hiring of a third office girl.
While the storage capacity of the district is ample
until about 1990 , provision has been made in this budget
to purchase (or obtain options to purchase) land for two
reservoir sites near S. W. 150th Avenue, between Beef Bend
Road and Bull Mountain Road. The Stevens, Thompson &
Runyan engineering study of 1971 advised that 23 million
gallons (MG) of storage would be needed by year 2000 .
This is shown as follows:
Storage
i
On Hand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 MG
#3 (own land) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 MG
Hi Tor (own land) . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 MG
150th & Bull Mt. Road. . . . . . . . 2 MG (need land)
150th & Beef Bend Road. . . . . . . 2 MG (need land)
Total: 23 MG
The purchase of a computerized billing machine and a
generator for auxiliary power which were recommended last
year are not included in the new budget. These items will
have to wait until future years.
Looking ahead to FY 1979-80 , the district' s only real
internal weaknesses are installation of direct, major trans-
mission mains from both Lake Oswego and Portland to the new
10-MG reservoir, and a new pump station at the 10-MG reservoir
-7-
BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued)
to serve the Hi Tor reservoir. The transmission mains
needed would be "connecting links" to existing transmission
pipelines. Costs for these projects are estimated as
follows:
(1) . S. W. Gaarde, 121st to Pacific Highway:
3, 500' of 36" D. I. pipe @ $70/ft. . . $245,000
3, 500 ' of 12" D.I. pipe @ $20/ft
(to replace 6" O.D. steel) . . . . . 70,000
Sub-total: $315,000
(2) . S. W. Tiedeman and North Dakota Street
to 121st and Gaarde Street:
10, 000 ' of 24" D.I . pipe @ $50/ft. . 500 , 000
(3) . Pump Station at 10-MG Reservoir:
Complete pump station with accessories. . 100 ,000
Total: $915, 000
The need for these additional facilities is not urgent,
and the costs may be too much without a bond issue. However,
as an alternative, consideration might be given to completing
some of these capital improvements from the General Fund in
future years. It could be accomplished in increments over
a period of years .
The proposed budget is fiscally responsible, fair to
both the patrons and employees, and will provide sufficient
funds to further the short range and long range goals of
the district.
-8-
b
BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued)
One can claim a major victory whenever consumer rates
*4w
remain the same, and are not increased. All one need do
is compare water rates with those of other public utilities ,
such as PGE, General Telephone, Northwest Natural Gas, etc. ,
and note their constant need to increase rates for their
services . Certainly, water districts are not immune to the
inflationary spiral anymore than other businesses. Finally,
while other water districts and cities are presently consid-
ering consumer rate increases, including a contemplated
wholesale rate increase of 28% by the City of Portland next
year, Tigard Water District' s patrons can enjoy superb ser-
vice and high quality water at the lowest rates in Washington
County. Many households get by on 10� per day for all their
water needs. What a bargain!
Respectfully submitted,
Robert E. Santee
Budget Officer
-9-
,;ARD WATER DISTRICT PROPOSED GENERAL ? 23D '
1976-77 1977-78 MAR 31, '78 JUNE 30, 1975 FT197
Cv i ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ESTIMATE ACTUAL BUDGET
Beginning Working Capital 63,833 111,000 129,437 129,437 102,000
INCOME
406 Meter Installations 224,925 235,300 163,185 230,300 264,800
Line Extension Rebate 1,800 3,000 6,124 6,400 7,200
'discellaneous Income 34,593 9,0002,285 2,963 3,000
�2 Interest Income 369 600 -0- -0- 600
'S-419 Water Sales 587,754 651,800 460,452 60.1,600 691,800
425 Penalties for Non-Pay 340 600 425 600 600
427 Sale of Equipment -0- 600 -0- -0- 600
430 Developer's - 10% Overhead 33,505 24,000 18,937 26,000 26,400
430-1 Developer's - 8% Engineering 17,950 16,000 13,617 18,000 18,000
430-2 Developer's - Equipment 8,1.74 8,000 3,2.82 5,000 6,000
430-3 Developer' s - Wage Reimb. 12,142 12,000 5,310 8,000 9,000
TOTAL INCOME AND WORKING CAPITAL 985,385 1,071,900 803,054 1,028,300 1,130,000
EXPENDITURES: Personal Services
500,1,2,3,4 Salaries 159,498 177,904 129,950 174,000 198,000
4i
504-1 Overtime 5,441 7,200 5,677 7,800 10,200
505 Field Labor 26,861 32,996 22,872 31,200 33,000
505,1,2 Office Employees 20,422 22,200 17,675 24,000 34,200
507 Blue Cross -- Medical 3,426 7,200 6,042 8,900 12,000
507-1 Bankers Life Neb. --Dental 880 1,200 794 1,100 1,200
508 NW Nat. Life -- Retirement 7,663 12,600 8,199 .10,850 10,800
509 Social Security 11,473 13,200 9,508 13,100 16,800
510 State Accident Insurance 10,305 13,200 9,096 11,800 14,400
511 State Unemployment Comp. 2,451 4,800 2,081 ` 2.,350 3,600
'holI l :;orvic:C"", 248,420 202,500 211 894 285,-100 334,200
PL^'NDITURES: Materials & Services
512 Advertising & Elections 728 600 17 200 600
514 Equipment Rentals 283 600 274 400 600
515 General Insurance 16,495 18,000 17,100 17,100 19,200
516 Miscellaneous Expenses 2.,077 1,800 1,899 2,800 3,000
517 Dues & Subscriptions 678 900 679 900 900
518,1 Office Supplies 10,126 9,000 7,408 10,000 10,800
519,1 Professional Fees 15,732 10,500 8,973 11,000 12,000
520 Meter Maintenance 4,921 6,000 1,942 3,000 4,800
521,1 Repairs -Lines, Pumps, etc. 4,863 6,000 4,660 6,400 6,000
52.2,1 Utilities 6,890 7,200 5,456 7,200 7,800
523 Fire Hydrant Maintenance 2,078 2,400 258 600 1,200
524 Truck & Equip. Maintenance 5,453 7,200 6,940 8,400 8,400
52.4-1 Gasoline & Oil 6,376 7,200 5,,564 7,400 7,800
524-2 Tires & Batteries 778 1,2.00 1,210 1,600 1,800
525,1 Water Costs - Electricity 30,766 36,000 21,930 32,000 36,000
525-2 Water Costs - L.O. & Port. 100,005 371,600 323,458 385,000 282,500
526 Interest Expense 984 13,600 13,492 13,500 600
527 Small. Tools 887 1,200 1,463 2,400 2,400
529 Rain Gear, Safety Equip. 1,025 1,200 917 1, 200 1,200
530 Employee Training 433 600 -0- 100 600
Total: Material & Services 211,578 502,800 423,640 511,200 408,200
EXPENDITURES: Capital Outlay
1;8 Fire Hydrants 2,750 2,400 1,945 2,000 2,400
F49 Equipment 73,738 5,000 2,432 3,500 28,000
550 Buildings & Additions -0- 900 -0- -0- 3,600
551 Meter Installations 38,063 43,300 31,935 41,200 47,40 ;'
552 Land & Improvements 8,434 42,000 41,244
554 Line Extensions 1,765 -0- -0-
5 5 5
0-555 Pipeline Replacements -0- -0- -0-
Total: Capital Outlay 124,750 93,600 77,556 88,000 119,E
-53 Operating Contingency -0- -0- -0- -0-
_-,sfer to Bond Sinking 271,200 72,000 42,000
D e 129,437 111,000 47,964 _
BALANCE 985,385 1,071,900 803,054 _
BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND
(April to June 1978)
April 1 , 1978
Resources
Available funds on hand. . . . . . . . . . . . $275 , 750
Interest Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 , 250
Total Resources: $280, 000
Requirements (April - June 1978)
10-MG Reservoir:
R. L. Martin. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2 , 600
Backfill + 36" cover. . . . 20, 000
Alt. control valves. . . . . 8 ,000
Convert pump @ #2 res. . . 6, 000
Electrical. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 , 000
$40, 600
Transmission Mains :
10-MG Reservoir to Corylus :
280 ' of 36" D. I . and 24"
concrete cyl. pipe. . . . . . . . . . . . 9 , 000
120 ' of 24" concrete cylinder
pipe on Hazeltree Street. . . . . 1, 400
Durham Road, 76th to 79th Ave:
600 ' of 12" D. I. @' $15/ft. . . . . . 9 , 000
North Dakota connection:
100' of 8" D.I . @ $10/ft. 1 ,000
100 ' of V.D. I. @ $8/ft. . 800
1, 800
Beef Bend Road, 123rd to 127th:
1, 360 ' of 12" D. I. @ $15/ft.
20 ,400
Less : Rebates : 9 ,400
11, 000
Sub-total Requirements: $ 72, 800
Unfunded Balance: 207 , 200
Total Requirements : $280 , 000
BC-1
BONO CONSTRUCTION ZUNI)
BUDGET
E
FY 1978 - 79
Resources
Available Funds on hand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 207 , 200
Interest Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 , 800
Total Resources: $210, 000
4:
Requirements
10-MG Reservoir:
R. L. Martin (Retainer) . . . . $50 , 000
Telemetry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5, 000
Cyclone fence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ,000
Improve 125th Avenue. . . . . . . 5, 000
Curbs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
Bike path. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500
Street lights (2) . . . . . . . . . . 1, 200
Landscaping, trees , etc. . . . 2, 500
$66, 700
Transmission Mains :
North Dakota St:.. @ RR:
300 ' of 1.2" n. 1 . (1 $15/ft: (4 , 500)
+ Fanno Creek crossing. . . . . . . . . . 9 , .')OO
Durham Road @ 74th Avenue:
300' of 12" D.I . @ $15/ft (4 , 500)
+ Fanno Creek crossing. . . . . . . . . . 9 , 500 A"
4;
Hi Tor Res. to B.P.A.
640 ' of 8" D. I . @ $10/ft. . . 6,400
850' of 6" D. I. @ $8/ft. . . . 6, 800
13 , 200 �'
141st and Bull Mt. Road: €"
640' of 8" D. I. @ $10/ft. . . 6, 400
1, 370 ' of '6" D. T . @ $8/ft. . 10,900
17 , 300
Gaarde and Rose Vista:
980 ' of 12" D. I. @ $15/ft. . 14 , 700
1, 400 ' of 6" D. I . @ $8/ft. . 11,200
PRV & control valves. . . . . . . 3, 500 29 , 400
Fern St. pump station to
132nd St. pump station:
2 ,260 ' of 12" D. I . @ $15/ft. . . . . . . 33 , 900
Duchilly to 121st and Gaarde:
700 ' of 36" D.T . @ $70/ft. . . . . . . . . 49 , 000
Sub-total Requirements: $228 ,500
General Fund Transfer:
Total Requirements : $210,000
BC-2
METER INSTALLATION INCOME
(Account .1406)
1976-77 1.977-78 1978--q-
Month
978-7aMonth Actual Actual Estimated (+ 15 ;} E ie--s :-
,July $ 1.1, 800 $ 9 , 300 $ 10 , 700 $ 101700
August 1-3, 500 18 , 200 20, 900 31, 600
September 20, 850 24 , 000 27 , 600 59 , 200
October 28 , 600 13 , 600 15, 600 74 , 800
November 15, 300 25 ,100 28 , 900 103 , 700
December 2.1, 690 10 ,130 11 , 600 115 , 300
January 9 , 000 11 , 500 13, 200 128 , 500
February 23, 340 20,155 23 , 200 151 , 70^
March 15, 300 31, 200 35 , 900 187 , 600
Total:
(9 months) 159 , 380 163, 185
As;;ume
Ar)ri_1_ 24 , 980 25 , 581> 29 , 400 217 , 00O
`rrr
May 31, 765 32 , 530 37 , 400 254 , 40,"
,lune 8 , 800 9 , 000 10 , 400 264 , 800
TOTAL: $224 , 925 $230,-300 $264 , 800
+++++++++++-f-'.-+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
HISTORY OF METER INSTALLATIONS
Fiscal Year Meter Income o Increase
1969-70 $ 20, 500 ---
1970-71 26, 767 +300-,,
1971-72 42, 711 +609,
1972-73 46 , 989 +10°
1.973-74 76 , 659 +63%
1974-75 90 , 383 +189
1975-76 142 , 573 +58°
1.976-77 224 , 925 +5896
1977-78 230, 300 + 2.0 (3 mo. est. )
1978-79 2.64, 800 +159 (Estimated)
-la-
'
WATER SALES
(Account 1�418-419)
1.976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total
Month �\otoaI Actual Estimate� (+lS�) Extension
JoIy $ 56/ 0OS $ 60 / 745 $ 69 / 900 $ 69 , 900
7\ugnot 64 , I1-5 70 , 36I 801900 150 , 800
September S8 , ] 93 68 , 043 78 , 300 229 / I00
October 50, 230 45 , 776 52 , 700 381 , 800
November 45 / 542 46, 241 53 , 200 335 / 000
December 44 / 378 39 , 672 45, 600 380 , 500
January 43/ 776 44 , 213 50 / 800 43I, 400
February 43, 298 43 , 641 50 , 200 481 , 600
March 40 , 412 41' 780 48 , 008 529 , 600
Total:
(9 months) 445 , 952 460 ,452
�nn�/mn
11-o.
-------------
�=~ A! ziI 39 , 535 40, 820 46 , 900 576 , 00
May 45 , 595 47 , 100 54 , 100 630 , 600
June 51, 52I 53 , 228 61 , 200 691 , 800
.
,
TOTAL: $582 , 603 $601, 600 $691, 800
ff+ff.ffffffffff+ff.ff+fffff+ff+ff.+ffff+fff.ff+ffffff+fffff+f
HISTORY OF WATER SALES
Fiscal Year ~ Water Sales Increase
I966-67 $ I09 / 268 4-22',
1967-68 131, 508 +20?i
I968-69 1-4I , 8I7 f 81",
I969-70 1.92 , 014 +�5�
" (Incl . now rates)
1970-7I 255, I30 +33&
197I-72 266 / 4II + 4&
1972-73 332, 384 +25'�)- (Incl . new rates)
I973-74 373 , 332 f129-,
1974-75 437 , 178 f17�
1975-76 538 , 606 f23",�5 (Inrl, new rates)
I976-77 582, 603 f V,
-~
1-977-78 60I/ 600 f 3P5 (Last3 mo. eat. )
I978-79 691, 800 flSG (T-'stiroated)
-2a-
WATER COSTS
(Account 4525-2)
1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total
Month Actual Actual Estimated (-t154) Extensicr
July $ 20 , 238 $ 26 , 847 $ 30 , 900 $ 30 , 900
August 22 , 2.79 31 , 314 36 , 000 66 , 900
September 1.4 , 633 1.6 , 870 19 , 400 86, 300
October 12 , 2.88 13, 499 15, 500 101 , 800
November 11, 798 18 , 284 21 , 000 122 , 800
December 11, 098 18 ,418 21, 200 144 , 000
January 14 , 386 2.1, 920 25 , 200 169 , 200
February 11 , 702 18 , 477 2.1, 200 190 , 400
March 1.2 , 561 19 , 511 22 ,400 212 , 800
Total :
(9 months) 130 , 983 185 ,140
Assume
April 11, 423 16, 11.0 18 , 500 231 , 300
May 13, 470 19 , 000 21 , 900 2.53 , 200
June 18, 050 25, 450 29 , 300 2.82 , 500
TOTAL: $173, 926 $2.45,700 $282 , 500
++++-t-+++++.-1-+++++-1-++-I-++.+++++++-!-+++-h+++++-1-+++++-h+-4-++-t--F++++
E?TSTORY OF WATER COSTS
Fiscal Year Water Costs % Tncr.ease
1968-69 $ 1 , 356 ---
1969-70 4 , 644 +242%
1970-71 2.7 , 2.15 +4805
1971-72. 31, 060 + 14%
1972-73 60 , 623 + 9V-,
1973-74 73 , 200 + 2.1%
1974-75 87 , 107 + 199: (Ac1j , for1975-76 153 , 008 + 76 �" rate inc. )
1976-77 173 , 926 + 14
1977-78 245,700 + 414 (3 mo. est. '
1978-79 282 , 500 - =_- '. 'E=t _r,ax_o-I
-3a-
METER INSTALLATION EXPENSE
(Account 4551.)
1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total
Month Actual Actual Estimated (+15%) Extension
July $ 1 , 112 $ 2 , 292 $ 2 , 600 $ 2 , 600
August 2. , 696 1 , 976 2 , 300 4 , 900
September 7 , 423 4 , PP4 5 , 600 10 , 500
October 3 , 751 8 , 2.45 9 , 500 20 , 000
November 6 , 425 2 , 417 2 , 800 2.2 , 800
December 3 , 354 1 , 658 1 , 900 24 ,700
January 791 4 , 966 5, 700 30, 400
February 1, 918 1, 560 1 , 800 32 , 200
March 1, 208 3, 937 4 , 500 36 , 700
Total:
(9 months) 28, 678 31, 935
Assume.
�I1'T Inc~
Apri 1. 1, 09f) 1, 220 1 , 38 , 200
May 3, 325 3 , 690 4 , 200 42 , 400
June 3 , 92.8 4 , 355 5 , 000 47 ,400
TOTAL: $37 , 030 $41, 2.00, $47 , 400
.............................................................
HISTORY OF METER INSTALLATION EXPENSE
Fiscal Year Meter Installation Expense Inc. or Dec .
1968-69 $ 18 , 710 ---
1969--70 11 , 825 -37%
1970-71 13 , 544 +15P
1971-72 20 , 441 -x-51
1972-73 30, 979 +520-,,
1.973-74 2.7 , 883 _lW111
1974-75 26 , 326 - 6%
1.975-76 28, 907 +10"5
1976-77 37 , 030 +28")
1977-78 41 , 2.00 +113 (3 mo .est)
1978-79 47 , 400 +1.52 (Est. )
-4a-
PROPOSED ':�: "__^ , _ "Y 1978-79
'cars Presen' !irCi:'J:J C1 (97) ? S1 : , ) Tiour1V '
Field Personnel Age .a,- ; Month ���`al_ ':Ro n h ---- T nr u it Wage
1. Admin.;Engineer Santee) 54 = _ $2 , 200 $26 , 400 S2 , 4 0 $2") , ----
2 . Foreman (John. Miller) 3 ) 1, 950 23 , 400 2 , 126 25 , 512 ----
3 . Leadmar_ (Russell Thomas) 34 1�2 1 , 387 15 , 640 1 , 512 18 , 144 $8 . 72
4 . Leadman (John Dixon) 51 6 1 ,387 16 , 640 1, 512 18 , 144 8 . 72
5 . Inv. Cont. & Meter Reader (B. Bryant) 59 11 < 1 , 274 15 , 288 1, 390 16 , 680 8 . 02
6 . -'Nater;aorkS Opr. tl (Randy Volk) 31 5 1 , 274 15 , 288 1, 390 16 , 680 8 . 02
7 . Wate vorks Opr. tl (Donnie roster) 34 3 1 , 274 15 , 288 1 , 390 16 , 680 8 . 02
8 . Waterr:or]�s 0-or. t2 (Roaert T>dams) 25 3 1 , 170 14 , 040 1 , 276 15 , 312 7 . 36
v, 9 . 11ater .orks Opr. 43 (Curtis Heintz) 22 1'z 1 ,118 13 , 416 1, 220 14 , 640 7 . 04
i
10. Waterworks Oxer. t3 (Harold uehn) 62 3 z 1 ,118 13 , 416 1 , 220 14 , 640 7 . 04
11. Draftsman (Ronnie Nall) 24 _ 960 1_1 , 520 1 , 046 12 , 552 ----
Total: Field Personnel 181, 336 197 , 784
Office Personnel
1, 000 12 000 1 0 13 , 800 (Includes i
1 2 . Bookkeeper (Nancy Larson) 32 ,yi5pay: $60/1110. t
1 3 . Cler'. -Typist (Annie Schwartz) 26 5 840 10 , 030 916 10 , 992 ----
1 ,1 . Billing Clerk (Brenda Healy) 21 - ---- ---- 750 9 , 000 ----
T=otal: Office Personnel ">-2 , 080 33 , 792
TOTAL: $203 , 416 $231 , 576
FOND SINKING Flip-4D
April 1 , 1978
RESOURCES
Estimated Funds , July J , 1.978 :
Cash in bank, April 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 20
Oregon State Investment Pool. . . . . . 121, 200
General Fund transfer (3 mo. ) . . . . . -0-
j % Uncollected taxes (3 mo. ) . . . . . . . . . 5 , 580
Interest Income (3 mo. ) . . . . . . . . . . . 2 , 800
Sub-total: 129 , 600
Less : Bond interest. payment, May l : - 501
Estimated Balance, July 1 , 1978 : -1.29 , 100
Estimated Funds, July 1, 1978 - June 30 , 1979 :
Interest Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10 , 300
Prior years ' tax levies . . . . . . . . . . . 4 , 600
General Fund transfer ($13 , 000/mo) 156 , 000
Estimated Income, FY1.978-79 : 170, 900
Total Taxes to balance budget: (See below) 160 , 000
TOTAL RESOURCES : $460 , 000
REQUIREMENTS
Present bonded indebtedness :
VY 1978-79 (P 1:inr� ipr�.J_ and Tnterest) "332 , 022
1"Y 1979-80 (Principal and 1'nt-erest) 127 , 978
liftew
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS : $460, 000
-----------------------------------------------------------
HISTORY OF ADVALOREM 'TAXES
Tax Rate Amount
Fiscal Year Assessed Valuation o Increase per $1, 000 Received
1.966-67 $ 37 , 600, 000 --- 40(� $ 15 , 100
1967-68 50,000 , 000 33% 33fi 16 , 400
1.968-69 61-, 900 , 000 24Q 34c, 21 , 000
1969-70 80 ,1.00 , 000 29% 24� 18 , 600
1970-71 96 , 700, 000 2.1° 24� 21 , 600
1971-72 111, 400, 000 1.50,> 2.6{ 29 , 000
1972-73 135, 854 , 000 2.2° 2.6� 35 , 300
1.973-74 157 , 037 , 000 1.69 30� 47 , 100
1974-75 194 , 780, 000 2.4°> 34e- 66 , 200
1975-76 235, 960, 000 2.1% 38�- 891700
1.976-77 260, 836 , 000 11_` 46(, 120 , 000
1977-78 32.0 , 588 , 000 23° 42� 134 , 600
1978-79 385, 000, 000 (est. ) 2097, (est. ) 42( 160 , 000 (est)
-6a-