Loading...
04/18/1978 - Budget Minutes Tigard Water District Budget Committee, FY 1978-79 2nd Regular Meeting April 18 , 1978 PRESENT: Board of Commissioners: Hugh A. Brown Clarence F. Nicoli Jerald R. Heater ' R. Verne Wheelwright Appointed Members: Don W. Thomas, Chairman William M. Stebbins, Secretary H. Dale Johnson Raleigh R. Meyer Michael D. O'Neil Absent: Commissioner Gene H. Chamberlin Robert E. Santee, Administrator VISITORS: None °+rw- The meeting was called to order by Chairman Thomas at 7: 34 p.m. Motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the last meeting, as written. Motion carried unanimously. Motion was made by Verne Wheelwright to increase meter installation income by $80 , 000 , such generated revenue to be applied on a line item under capital outlay for pipelines, and that residential meter (3/4") fees be increased by $200 each. Motion died for lack of second. Considerable discussion ensued about meter con- ' nection fees. Motion was made by Michael O'Neil and seconded by Hugh Brown to approve the proposed budget for all funds. (Including General Fund, Bond Sinking Fund, Bond Construction Fund, and tax levy) . Motion car- ried unanimously. %s, Motion was made to adjourn at 9: 40 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. The next meeting, with public hearing, was scheduled for May 9, 1978 at 7 : 30 p.m. William M. Stebbins Secretary Tigard Water District Budget Committee, FY 1978-79 1st Regular Meeting ,,,r,, April 11, 1978 PRESENT: Board of Commissioners : Hugh A. Brown Clarence F. Nicoli Jerald R. Heater R. Verne Wheelwright Appointed Members : H. Dale Johnson William M. Stebbins Don W. Thomas Raleigh R. Meyer Absent: Commissioner Gene H. Chamberlin Michael D. O'Neil Robert E. Santee, Administrator John P. Miller, Foreman Dennis H. Quade, Attorney (Departed 8 : 45 p.m. ) Army VISITORS: None The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Brown at 8 : 00 p.m. Nominations were made and seconded for the following positions: Chairman: Don W. Thomas Secretary: William M. Stebbins Nominations were approved unanimously. The budget message was presented by the Budget Officer, Robert E. Santee. A proposed budget document was presented by the Budget Officer. -1- Budget Committee Meeting April 11, 1978 Meter connection fees were discussed in detail. Chairman Thomas directed the Budget Officer to prepare and submit the following information at the next meeting: (1) Meter connection fees of other water districts and cities. (2) True cost to a new home owner for a water service connection, including meter installation, pipe- line with appurtenances, etc. , (fire hydrants , gate valves, etc. ) . (3) List number of meters installed in past years. (4) List amount of water consumed in prior years. The next meeting of the budget committee was scheduled for 7 :30 p.m. , Tuesday, April 18, 1978 . Motion was made to adjourn at 9 : 52 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. ‘4w. William M. Stebbins Secretary -2- Tigard Water District 4-78 Regular Meeting April 11, 1978 mow PRESENT: Hugh A. Brown, Chairman Clarence F. Nicoli, Treasurer Jerald R. Heater, Secretary R. Verne Wheelwright (7 :41 p.m. ) Robert E. Santee, Administrator John P. Miller, Foreman Dennis H. Quade, Attorney VISITORS: None. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Brown at 7 : 34 p.m. Motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the last meeting, as written. Motion carried unani- mously. wr.- Motion was made and seconded to pay the vouchers. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Brown officially appointed the Administrator, Robert Santee, as the alternate to Verne Wheelwright to represent the district at all meetings of the Willamette River Water Source Committee. Jerald Heater suggested that the Administrator be authorized to hire the services of a photographer and obtain picturesof the district' s facilities to hang in the office. He stated that he thought the construction of the 10-MG reservoir was quite a feat and it should be appropriately shown to the public. Consideration should be given to have "opening day" ceremonies when the tank is fully operational. Motion was made to adjourn at 7 :48 p.m. w. BUDGET MESSAGE FY 1978-79 wow TIGARD WATER DISTRICT During the present fiscal year the water district has been on the accrual versus cash basis in its account- ing and budgetary method. This method of accounting commenced on July 1, 1975 and employs the generally accepted principles for an operating utility enterprise. The accrual method of accounting will again be utilized for the new fiscal year 1978-79, beginning July 1, 1978. The financial policies of the water district will remain essentially the same as in past years. Prior to submitting a proposed budget it would be appropriate to review the major decisions and accom- plishments of the past fiscal year. Significant events have occurred which make this year' s (1977-78) budget look like a disaster area. In the preparation of the budget last April there was every indication that the financial status of the water district would be out- standing. One member of the budget committee even sug- gested that water rates by reduced. Unfortunately, two specific events occurred during the year which changed the situation drastically. These were: (1) . A decision on October 4 , 1977 by the Court of Nay Appeals to reverse a favorable decision by the Circuit Court on the water district' s lawsuit with the City of -1- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) Lake Oswego over wholesale water rates. Subsequently, the Oregon State Supreme Court refused to hear the case, thereby exhausting all avenues of appeal. The case was lost. Consequently, retroactive payments, plus interest, from July 1, 1975, totaling $272,100 had to be derived from this year' s budgeted funds (General Fund) . The district' s total annual budget is about $1 million, so one can readily imagine the severe impact upon the finan- cial status of the district. In addition, since these liabilities and charges were not budgeted for in FY 1976-77 , the auditor' s report for that period expressed a "qualified" opinion as to the financial position of the district. (2). As a result of the unusual drought conditions last year, and the subsequent declaration by elected offi- cials to conserve water, income from water sales increased by only 3% versus the normal 12% to 25% . Since income from water sales constitutes over half the revenue of the dis- trict, the conservation program had a deleterious effect upon anticipated revenues. (This is not to say that con- servation methods should not be encouraged) . While these events have had an adverse effect upon the district' s financial position, the over-all status of the district is not that grim. In other words , the district has enough flexibility to absorb such set-backs, and still achieve the goals and objectives established. Some of the brighter achievements during the past year are listed as follows : -2- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) a. Storage: low Completion of a 10-MG reservoir which will meet the needs of the district until about 1990. b. Distribution: The pipeline replacement program continued on schedule and should essentially be finished within the next year. The entire distribution system will consist of either cast or ductile iron pipelines with excellent pressures through- out the system. c. Source: Elected officials representing six different govern- mental bodies, including Tigard Water District, are meeting monthly for the purpose of considering a proposal to jointly develop the Willamette River at Wilsonville as a source of water. Within 6 months a decision should be reached whether to proceed with such a venture. Other alternatives could include a "buy-in" to the City of Lake Oswego (Clackamas River) system or continued purchases of surplus water from the City of Portland (Bull Run) . The proposed budget recommends no increase in consumer user rates or meter connection charges. These rates and charges were last increased in April 1975. It is proposed that the advalorem tax rate remain the same at 42 per $1, 000 assessed valuation. It is emphasized -3- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) that actual dollars to be paid by each patron (property owner) may not be the same because of the continual in- crease in assessed valuation of real property. Because of this, the actual amount to be received from taxes will be about $160, 000, an increase of $25,400. These funds, together with the remaining balance in the Bond Sinking Fund, and a transfer of $156, 000 from the General Fund, will be earmarked for payment of bonded indebtedness which will total $3, 018, 000 on June 30, 1978 . Thus , funds needed to pay the annual premiums for bonded in- debtedness will be shared about equally between taxes and user fees. Because the General Obligation bond issues, and resultant taxation authority, were previously approved by the patrons at the polls, there is no require- 4410, ment to acquire voter approval to request the necessary taxes to balance the budget. It is noted that the amount of taxes to be generated this year is derived "backwards" since limits have been imposed on the district. During the solicitation of the $1. 9 million bond measure in May 1976, the Board of Com- missioners pledged that there would be no increase in the tax rate if the bond measure passed at the polls. (This established a maximum figure) . On the other hand, as one studies the budget document, it becomes obvious that the district needs every available tax dollar to balance the budget. (This establishes a minimum figure) . (Ergo: 42 per $1, 000 assessed valuation) . -4- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) There is a bright note about the district' s bonded indebtedness. Commencing in November 1979, and each sub- sequent 3 years thereafter, the first of several bond issues will mature and be liquidated. This will take a substantial burden off annual budgets in the future. The proposed budget will be austere with no frills. It becomes apparent that rate increases will be necessary next year if the district is to remain solvent. It is recommended that the staff make an in-depth study of all sources of revenue, including user rates, meter charges, out-of-district rates, etc. An effective date of April 20 , 1979 for the rate increases is considered realistic and the public should be so alerted. wow Our patrons still enjoy the lowest water rates of all adjacent water districts and cities, except Portland, as shown below: Average Monthly Water Bill* Portland $ 4 . 60 Tigard Water Dist8. 04 **Metzger Water Dist8 . 39 **Lake Oswego 10. 21 Tualatin 11. 89 Lake Grove W.D 14 . 80 * Includes taxes ($40,000 home) ** Have held public hearings to increase water rates. Summarized preliminary budget documents for the General Fund and Bond Construction Fund have been prepared for the next fiscal year and are shown on the opposite side of this folder. Supporting documents are also enclosed following -5- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) this budget message. It is emphasized that the budget document is a financial guide only, and when approved and adopted, legally authorizes the Board of Commissioners to expend funds in specific categories. It does not autho- rize the staff to expend any funds. Approval of individual appropriations is accomplished at regular monthly meetings by the Board of Commissioners. Following is a listing of the major items in the budget: GENERAL FUND Income Beginning Balance $102 , 000 9% Meter Installations 264 ,800 24% ""'' Water Sales 691,800 61% Miscellaneous 71, 400 6% Total Income: $1,130 ,000 100% Expenditures Salaries & Fringes $ 334 , 200 30% Water Costs 282, 500 25% Meter Installations 47 , 400 4% Bond Sinking Fund 156 , 000 14% Miscellaneous 207 ,900 18% Ending Balance 102 , 000 9% Total Exp. : $1,130 , 000 100% All remaining funds ($207 ,200) in the Bond Construc- tion Fund will be expended during the upcoming fiscal year. The Board of Commissioners has approved, and the em- 44mor ployees have accepted, a 9% basic salary increase for the next fiscal year. (The Consumer Price Index for the Port- -6- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) land Metropolitan area is 8. 99%) . The employees of the district are not unionized. Also approved, for inclusion in the budget, is the purchase of a new dump truck and the hiring of a third office girl. While the storage capacity of the district is ample until about 1990 , provision has been made in this budget to purchase (or obtain options to purchase) land for two reservoir sites near S. W. 150th Avenue, between Beef Bend Road and Bull Mountain Road. The Stevens, Thompson & Runyan engineering study of 1971 advised that 23 million gallons (MG) of storage would be needed by year 2000 . This is shown as follows: Storage On Hand 17 MG #3 (own land) 1 MG Hi Tor (own land) 1 MG 150th & Bull Mt. Road 2 MG (need land) 150th & Beef Bend Road 2 MG (need land) Total: 23 MG The purchase of a computerized billing machine and a generator for auxiliary power which were recommended last year are not included in the new budget. These items will have to wait until future years. Looking ahead to FY 1979-80 , the district' s only real internal weaknesses are installation of direct, major trans- '► mission mains from both Lake Oswego and Portland to the new 10-MG reservoir, and a new pump station at the 10-MG reservoir -7- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) to serve the Hi Tor reservoir. The transmission mains needed would be "connecting links" to existing transmission pipelines. Costs for these projects are estimated as follows: (1) . S. W. Gaarde, 121st to Pacific Highway: 3, 500' of 36" D. I. pipe @ $70/ft $245,000 3, 500 ' of 12" D.I. pipe @ $20/ft (to replace 6" O.D. steel) 70,000 Sub-total: $315,000 (2) . S. W. Tiedeman and North Dakota Street to 121st and Gaarde Street: 10, 000 ' of 24" D.I . pipe @ $50/ft500 , 000 (3) . Pump Station at 10-MG Reservoir: Complete pump station with accessories. . 100 ,000 wr. Total: $915, 000 The need for these additional facilities is not urgent, and the costs may be too much without a bond issue. However, as an alternative, consideration might be given to completing some of these capital improvements from the General Fund in future years. It could be accomplished in increments over a period of years . The proposed budget is fiscally responsible, fair to both the patrons and employees, and will provide sufficient funds to further the short range and long range goals of the district. -8- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) One can claim a major victory whenever consumer rates remain the same, and are not increased. All one need do is compare water rates with those of other public utilities , such as PGE, General Telephone, Northwest Natural Gas, etc. , and note their constant need to increase rates for their services . Certainly, water districts are not immune to the inflationary spiral anymore than other businesses. Finally, while other water districts and cities are presently consid- ering consumer rate increases, including a contemplated wholesale rate increase of 28% by the City of Portland next year, Tigard Water District' s patrons can enjoy superb ser- vice and high quality water at the lowest rates in Washington County. Many households get by on 10 per day for all their water needs. What a bargain! Respectfully submitted, / : —AOr� Robert E. Santee Budget Officer -9- F C - „. _:. ARD WATER DISTRICT PROPOSED GENERAL FUND B I" - 7"S'---9 1976-77 1977-78 MAR 31/ '78 JUNE 30, 1972 FYI97E-7" A:-..=T= ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ESTIMATE ACTUAL BUDGET Beginning Working Capital 63,833 111,000 129,437 129,437 102,000 INCOME 406 Meter Installations 224,925 235,300 163,185 230,300 264,800 Line Extension Rebate 1,800 3,000 6,124 6,400 7,200 Miscellaneous Income 34,593 9,000 2,285 2,963 3,000 --2 Interest Income 369 600 -0- -0- 600 8-419 Water Sales 587,754 651,800 460,452 601,600 691,800 425 Penalties for Non-Pay 340 600 425 600 600 427 Sale of Equipment -0- 600 -0- -0- 600 430 Developer's - 10% Overhead 33,505 24,000 18,937 26,000 26,40C 430-1 Developer's - 8% Engineering 17,950 16,000 13,617 18,000 18,000 430-2 Developer's - Equipment 8,174 8,000 3,282 5,000 6,000 430-3 Developer' s - Wage Reimb. 12,142 12,000 5,310 8,000 9,00G TOTAL INCOME AND WORKING CAPITAL 985,385 1,071,900 803,054 1,02.8,300 1,130,000 EXPENDITURES: Personal Services 500,1,2,3,4 Salaries 159,498 177,904 129,950 174,000 198,000 504-1 Overtime 5,441 7,200 5,677 7,800 10,200 505 Field Labor 26,861 32,996 22,872 31,200 33,000 505,1,2 Office Employees 20,422 22,200 17,675 24,000 34,200 507 Blue Cross -- Medical 3,426 7,200 6,042 8,900 12,000 507-1 Bankers Life Neb. --Dental 880 1,200 794 1,100 1,200 508 NW Nat. Life -- Retirement 7,663 12,600 8,199 10,850 10,800 509 Social Security 11,473 13,200 9,508 13,100 16,800 510 State Accident Insurance 10,305 13,200 9,096 11,800 14,400 511 State Unemployment Comp. 2,4514 800 2,081 2,350 3,600 Tocol . h,r:;on,11 Ser.vice:3 248,420 292,500 211 ,894 285,100 334,2(0) 4100iPENDITURES: Materials & Services 512 Advertising & Elections 728 600 17 200 600 514 Equipment Rentals 283 600 274 400 600 515 General Insurance 16,495 18,000 17,100 17,100 19,200 516 Miscellaneous Expenses 2,077 1,800 1,899 2,800 3,000 517 Dues & Subscriptions 678 900 679 900 900 518,1 Office Supplies 10,126 9,000 7,408 10,000 10,800 519,1 Professional Fees 15,732 10,500 8,973 11,000 12,000 520 Meter Maintenance 4,921 6,000 1,942 3,000 4,800 521,1 Repairs -Lines, Pumps, etc. 4,863 6,000 4,660 6,400 6,000 522,1 Utilities 6,890 7,200 5,456 7,200 7,800 523 Fire Hydrant Maintenance 2,078 2,400 258 600 1,200 524 Truck & Equip. Maintenance 5,453 7,200 6,940 8,400 8,400 524-1 Gasoline & Oil 6,376 7,200 5,564 7,400 7,800 524-2 Tires & Batteries 778 1,200 1,210 1,600 1,800 525,1 Water Costs - Electricity 30,766 36,000 21,930 32,000 36,000 525-2 Water Costs - L.O. & Port. 100,005 371,600 323,458 385,000 282,500 526 Interest Expense 984 13,600 13,492 13,500 600 527 Small. Tools 887 1,200 1,463 2,400 2,400 529 Rain Gear, Safety Equip. 1,025 1,200 917 1, 200 1,200 530 Employee Training 433 600 -0- 100 600 Total: Material & Services 211,578 502,800 423,640 511,200 408,200 -XPENDITURES: Capital Outlay '8 Fire Hydrants 2,750 2,400 1,945 2,000 2,400 q!'49 Equipment 73,738 5,000 2,432 3,500 28,000 550 Buildings & Additions -0- 900 -0- -0- 3,600 551 Meter Installations 38,063 43,300 31,935 41,200 47,400 552 Land & Improvements 8,434 42,000 41,244 41, 3 .,7 13,- ?,- 554 Line Extensions 1,765 -0- -0- - _ . _ - _ 555 Pipeline Replacements -0- -0- -0- 1 , ` Total: Capital Outlay 124,750 93,600 77,556 88,000 119,E 553 Operating Contingency -0- -0- -0- -0- _ Transfer to Bond Sinking 271,200 72,000 42,000 42,00' - Balance 129/437 I,14t.Qw 47,964 ' -- : : _ _ :. 77-:-:Ti:,. _ _7 ... ' . 7N-DING BALANCE 985,385 1,071,900 803,054 , : 1 , . - - _ .._ BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND (April to June 1978) April 1 , 1978 Resources Available funds on hand $275 , 750 Interest Income 4 , 250 Total Resources: $280, 000 Requirements (April - June 1978) 10-MG Reservoir: R. L. Martin $ 2 , 600 Backfill + 36" cover20, 000 Alt. control valves 8 ,000 Convert pump @ #2 res6, 000 Electrical 4 , 000 $40, 600 Transmission Mains : 10-MG Reservoir to Corylus : • 280 ' of 36" D. I . and 24" concrete cyl. pipe 9 , 000 120 ' of 24" concrete cylinder pipe on Hazeltree Street 1, 400 Durham Road, 76th to 79th Ave: 600 ' of 12" D. I. @' $15/ft 9 , 000 North Dakota connection: 100' of 8" D.I . @ $10/ft. 1 ,000 100 ' of 6" •D. I. @ $8/ft. . 800 1, 800 Beef Bend Road, 123rd to 127th: 1, 360 ' of 12" D. I. @ $15/ft. 20 ,400 Less : Rebates : 9 ,400 11, 000 Sub-total Requirements: $ 72, 800 Unfunded Balance: 207 , 200 NNW Total Requirements : $280 , 000 BC-1 BONO CONSTRUCTION FUND BUDGET FY 1978 - 79 Resources Available Funds on hand $ 207 , 200 Interest Income 2 , 800 Total Resources: $210, 000 Requirements 10-MG Reservoir: • R. L. Martin (Retainer) . . . . $50 , 000 Telemetry 5, 000 Cyclone fence 2 ,000 Improve 125th Avenue 5, 000 Curbs 500 Bike path 500 Street lights (2) 1, 200 Landscaping, trees , etc2, 500 $66, 700 Transmission Mains : North Dakota St . @ RR: 300 ' of 12" D. T . 0 $15/ft (4 , 500) + Fanno Creek crossing 9 , ')00 Durham Road @ 74th Avenue: 300' of 12" D.I . @ $15/ft (4 , 500) + Fanno Creek crossing 9 , 500 }3i Hi Tor Res. to B.P.A. 640 ' of 8" D. I . @ $10/ft. . . 6,400 850' of 6" D. I. @ $8/ft. . . . 6, 800 13 , 200 141st and Bull Mt. Road: 640' of 8" D. I. @ $10/ft. . . 6, 400 1, 370 ' of '6" D. I . @ $8/ft. . 10,900 17 , 300 Gaarde and Rose Vista: 980 ' of 12" D. I. @ $15/ft. . 14 , 700 1, 400 ' of 6" D. I . @ $8/ft. . 11,200 PRV & control valves 3, 500 29 , 400 Fern St. pump station to 132nd St. pump station: 2 ,260 ' of 12" D. I . @ $15/ft 33 , 900 11411.1 Duchilly to 121st and Gaarde: 700 ' of 36" D.T . @ $70/ft 49 , 000 Sub-total Requirements: $228 ,500 General Fund Transfer: Total Requirements : $210,000 BC-2 METER INSTALLATION INCOME (Account 4406) 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Month ActualActual Estimated (+ 15 % �- ) Ex es July $ 11, 200 $ 9 , 300 $ 10 ,700 $ 10 , 70{) August 13 , 500 18 , 200 20 , 900 31 , 600 September 20, 850 24 , 000 27 , 600 59 , 200 October 28 , 600 13 , 600 15, 600 74 , 800 November 15, 300 25 ,100 28 , 900 103 ,700 December 21 , 690 10 ,130 11 , 600 115 , 300 January 9 , 000 11 , 500 13, 200 128 , 500 February 23, 340 20,155 23 , 200 151 , 700 March 15, 300 31, 200 35 , 900 187 , 600 Total: (9 months) 159 , 380 163, 185 1\s;dame 1\pri1. 24 , 980 25 , 585 29 , 400 21 7 , 00() May 31, 765 32 , 530 37 , 400 254 , 400 June 8 , 800 9 , 000 10 , 400 264 , 800 TOTAL: $2.24 , 925 $230,300 $264 , 800 ++++++++++++++±+++±+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ HISTORY OF METER INSTALLATIONS Fiscal Year Meter Income % Increase 1969-70 $ 20, 500 --- 1970-71 26, 767 +30% 1971-72 42, 711 +60% 1972-73 46 , 989 +10% 1973-74 76 , 659 +63% 1974-75 90 , 383 +18% 1975-76 142 , 573 +58% 1976-77 224 , 925 +58% 1977-78 230, 300 + 2% (3 mo. est. ) 1978-79 264, 800 +15% (Estimated) -1a- WATER SALES (Account #418-41.9) 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total ` Month Actual Actual. Estimated (+15%) Extension July $ 56, 008 $ 60 , 745 $ 69 , 900 $ 69 , 900 August 64 , 115 70 , 361 80, 900 150 , 800 September 58 , 193 68 , 043 78 , 300 22.9 , 100 October 50, 230 45 , 776 52 , 700 281 , 200 November 45 , 542 46, 241 53 , 200 335 , 000 December 44 , 378 39 , 672 45, 600 380 , 600 January 43, 776 44 , 213 50 , 800 431, 400 February 43, 298 43 , 641 50 , 200 481 , 600 March 40 , 412 41, 760 48 , 000 529 , 600 Total: (9 months) 445 , 952 460 ,452 T1: s;nme 3 . ,")% Inc. *440" April 39 , 535 40, 820 46 , 900 576 , %>fl0 May 45 , 595 47 , 100 54 , 100 630 , 600 June 51, 521 53 , 228 61 , 200 691 , 800 TOTAL: $582 , 603 $601, 600 $691, 800 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++f++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ HISTORY OF WATER SALES Fiscal Year Water Sales S Increase 1966-67 $ 109 , 268 +22% 1967-68 131, 508 +20% 1968--69 141 , 817 + 8`.; 1969-70 192 , 014 +35% 1970-71 255, 130 +33' (Incl . new rates`, 1971-72 266 , 411 + 4% 1972-73 332, 384 +25% (Incl . new rates) 1973-74 373 , 332 +12% 1974-75 437 , 178 +17% 1975-76 538 , 606 +23% (Incl. new rates) 1976-77 582, 603 + 8% 1977-78 601, 600 + 3% (Last 3 mo. est. ) 1978-79 691 , 800 +15% (Estimated) -2a- WATER COSTS (Account #525-2) '*w 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total Month Actual Actual F stimatod (+15%) Extension July $ 20 , 238 $ 26 , 847 $ 30 , 900 $ 30 , 900 August 22 , 279 31 , 314 3r, , 000 66 , 900 September 14 , 633 16 , 870 19 , 400 86, 300 October 12 , 288 13, 499 15, 500 101 , 800 1 November 11,798 18 , 284 21 , 000 122 , 800 December 11, 098 18 ,418 21, 200 144 , 000 January 14 , 386 21, 920 25 , 200 169 , 200 February 11 ,702 18 , 477 21, 200 190 , 400 March 1.2 , 561 19 , 511 22 ,400 212 , 800 Total : (9 months) 130 ,983 185 ,140 Assume 444%., 41-9, Inc. April 11, 423 16, 110 18 , 500 231 , 300 May 13, 470 19 , 000 21 , 900 253 , 200 June 18, 050 25, 450 29 , 300 282 , 500 TOTAL: $173, 926 $245,700 $282 , 500 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++4-++++++++++++++++++++++ HISTORY OF WATER COSTS Fiscal Year Water Costs % Increase 1968-69 $ 1 , 356 --- 1969-70 4 , 644 +242% 1970-71 27 , 215 +486% 1971-72 31, 060 + 14% 1972-73 60 , 623 + 95% 1973-74 73 , 200 ± 21% 1974-75 87 , 107 + 19% ' 111975-76 153 , 008 + 76 (Aclj . for ' 1976-77 173 , 926 + 14o rate inc. ) 1977-78 245,700 + 41`.'s (3 mo. est. ' 1978-79 282 , 500 - =_- . 'Estim<<'-'_. -3a- METER INSTALLATION EXPENSE (Account #551) 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total Month Actual Actual Estimated (+15%) Extension Now July $ 1 , 112 $ 2 , 292 $ 2 , 600 $ 2 , 600 August 2 , 696 1 , 976 2 , 300 4 , 900 September 7 , 423 4 , 4 5 , 600 10 , 500 October 3 , 751 8 , 245 9 , 500 20 , 000 November 6 , 425 2 , 417 2 , 800 22 , 800 December 3 , 354 1 , 658 1 , 900 24 ,700 January 791 4 , 966 5, 700 30, 400 February 1, 918 1, 560 1 , 800 32 , 200 March 1, 208 3, 937 4 , 500 36 , 700 Total: (9 months) 28, 678 31, 935 Assume 11 Int?. April 1 , 099 1, 220 1 , 500 38 , 200 Now May 3, 325 3 , 690 4 , 200 42 , 400 June 3 , 92.8 4 , 355 5 , 000 47 ,400 TOTAL: $37 , 030 $41, 200, $47 , 400 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ HISTORY OF METER INSTALLATION EXPENSE Fiscal Year Meter Installation Expense % Inc. or Dec . 1968-69 $ 18 , 710 --- 1969-70 11 , 825 -37% 1970-71 13 , 544 +15% 1971-72 20 , 441 +51 1972-73 30, 979 +52% 1973-74 27 , 883 -10% 1974-75 26 , 326 - 6% 1975-76 28, 907 +10% 1976-77 37 , 030 +28% 1977-78 41 , 200 +1.1% (3 mo .est) 1978-79 47 , 400 +15% (Est. ) Now -4a- ( ( I PROPOSED A PS ; - 7 , FY 1978-79 ears Present Proa`;os: d (9? ? 51w: . ) Hourly Field Personnel Age , �:•,-= Month Annual 'o���h - .•: Tinu,_i1_ Wage 1. Admin.;Engineer (�. E. Santee) 54 - _ $2 , 200 $26 , 400 2 , => jr; $? , 300 00 ---- 2 . Foreman (John Miller) 32 13 1, 950 23 , 400 2 , 1")6 25 , 512 ---- 3. Leadman (Russell Thomas) 34 121 1 , 387 16 , 640 1 , 512 18 , 144 $8 . 72 4 . Leadman (John Dixon) 51 6 1 ,387 16 , 640 1, 512 18 , 144 8 . 72 5 . Inv. Cont. & Meter Reader (B. Bryant) 59 11� 1 , 274 15 , 288 1, 390 16 , 680 8 . 02 6 . Waterworks Opr. #1 (Randy Volk) 31 3 1 , 274 15 , 288 1, 390 16 , 680 8 . 02 7 . Waterworks Opr. #1 (Donnie Foster) 34 3 1 , 274 15 , 288 1 , 390 16 , 680 8 . 02 8. Waterworks Our. #2 (Robert Adams) 25 3 1 , 170 14 , 040 1 , 276 15 , 312 7 . 36 U, 9 . Waterworks Opr. 73 (Curtis Heintz) 22 1; 1 ,118 13 , 416 1, 220 14 , 640 7 . 04 I 10. Waterworks Opr. #3 (Harold Kuehn) 62 3z 1 ,118 13 , 416 1 , 220 14 , 640 7 . 04 11. Draftsman (Bonnie Hall) 24 _ 960 11 , 520 1 , 046 12 , 552 ---- Total: Field Personnel 181, 336 197 , 734 Office Personnel 12 . Bookkeeper (Nancy Larson) 32 3 1, 000 12 , 000 1 ,150 13 , 800 (Includes i pay: $60/m0. 1 11 . Clerk-Typist (Annie Schwartz) 26 5 840 10 , 030 916 10 , 992 ---- 1 .1 . Billing Clerk (Brenda Healy) 21 - ---- ---- 750 9 , 000 ---- Total: Office Personnel 2.2 , 000 33 , 792 TOTAL: $203 , 416 $231, 576 BOND SINKING FUND April 1 , 1978 RESOURCES Estimated Funds , July 1 , 1978 : Cash in bank, April 1 $ 20 Oregon State Investment Pool 121, 200 General Fund transfer (3 mo. ) -0- I 4y, Uncollected taxes (3 mo. ) 5 , 580 Interest Income (3 mo. ) 2 , 800 Sub-total : 12.9 , 600 Less : Bond interest payment, May 1 : - 500 Estimated Balance, July 1 , 1.978 : 129 , 100 Estimated Funds, July 1, 1978 - June 30 , 1979 : Interest Income $ 10 , 300 Prior years ' tax levies 4 , 600 General Fund transfer. ($13 , 000/mo) 156 , 006 Estimated Income, FY1.978-79 : 170, 900 Total Taxes to balance budget: (See below) 160 , 000 TOTAL RESOURCES : $460 , 000 REQUIREMENTS Present bonded indebtedness : t''Y 1978-79 (Principal and Interest) : $332 , 022 EY 1979-80 (Principal and Tnte.r.est) (k;) : 127 , 978 4 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS : $460, 000 HISTORY OF ADVALOREM TAXES Tax Rate Amount Fiscal Year Assessed Valuation % Increase per $1, 000 Received 1966-67 $ 37 , 600, 000 --- 40 $ 15 , 100 1967-68 50,000 , 000 33% 33fi 16 , 400 1968-69 61, 900 , 000 24% 34$ 21 , 000 1969-70 80 ,100 , 000 29% 24$ 18 , 600 1970-71 96 , 700, 000 21% 24$ 21 , 600 1971-72 111, 400, 000 15% 26$' 2.9 , 000 1972-73 135, 854 , 000 22° 26$ 35 , 300 1973-74 157 , 037 , 000 16% 30$ 47 , 100 1974-75 194 , 780, 000 24% 34$;' 66 , 200 1975-76 235, 960, 000 21% 38$' 89 , 700 1976-77 260, 836 , 000 11% 46$ 120 , 000 1977-78 320 , 588 , 000 23% 42$ 134 , 600 1978-79 385, 000, 000 (est. ) 20% (est. ) 42$ 160 , 000 (est) -6a-