The URL can be used to link to this page

05/09/1978 - Packet TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 9541 S. W. COMMERCIAL ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE (503) 639-1554 May 9, 1978 AGENDA BUDGET HEARING (FY 1978-79) CALL TO ORDER 1. VISITORS ADJOURNMENT REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER 1. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF LAST MEETING 2. VISITORS 3. RESOLUTION TO PAY VOUCHERS 4. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT FY1978-79 BUDGET FOR ALL FUNDS, LEVYING TAXES , AND APPROPRIATING EXPENDITURES AS APPROVED BY THE BUDGET COM- MITTEE 5. ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1978- 1979, COMMENCING JULY 1, 1978 6. OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 1. Resolution to approve minutes of last meeting. 2. Visitors. 3. Resolution to pay vouchers. 4. Resolution to adopt FY 1978-79 budget for all funds, levying taxes, and appropriating expenditures as approved by the budget committee. (See complete resolution attached hereto) . 5. Election of officers for fiscal year 1978-79, com- mencing July 1, 1978. Past officers and years of service are as follows : Fiscal Year From To Chairman Secretary Treasurer Jul 1974 - Jun 1975 V. Wheelwright J. Schwartz C. Nicoli Jul 1975 - Jun 1976 D. Thomas G. Chamberlin C. Nicoli Jul 1976 - Jun 1977 C. Nicoli H. Brown G. Chamberlin Jul 1977 - Jun 1978 H. Brown J. Heater C. Nicoli Positions up for reelection on April 2, 1979 : Position Number Name 3 Clarence Nicoli 4 Gene Chamberlin 5 Hugh Brown lour 6. Other business. -1- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) *my 7 . Water pumped from wells, Calendar Year 1978 . Month Actual *Actual Allocation 1978 Cubic Feet Acre-Feet Acre-Feet Remarks Jan -0- -0- 88 (All wells off) Feb -0- -0- 88 " Mar -0- -0- 88 " " " Apr 3 ,553,450 81. 6 88 (#4 well off) Total: 3, 553,450 81. 6 352 Actually pumped in prior years: 1974 : 924 Acre-Feet 1976: 847 Acre-Feet 1975: 930 Acre-Feet 1977 : 575 Acre-Feet * 1 Acre-Foot = 43, 560 Cubic Feet. 8. Unmetered Water, Fiscal Year 1977-78. Pumped Purchased Total Sold Loss Month & Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Loss VOW Year x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 % Apr 1978 3,553 3,344 (L.0. ) 6, 897 6, 221 676 10. 9% -0- (Port) Total: 13, 241 73,462 86,703 82, 008 4 , 695 5. 4% 9. Percentage of Bull Run water purchased for computing amount due for Systems Development Charge, FY 1977-78. Month & Well Lake Oswego Portland Total % Bull Year Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Run Jul 1977 1,478,780 8, 090, 600 2, 065 ,700 11, 635 , 080 17. 8% Aug 1977 3, 837 ,780 5, 992,800 5 ,198 ,400 15,028 , 980 34 . 6% Sep 1977 4, 037, 070 4 , 020, 900 657 ,400 8 ,715,370 7. 5% Oct 1977 251,560 7, 087, 000 -0- 7 , 338 ,560 0. 0% Nov 1977 -0- 7 ,176,700 300 7 ,177 ,000 0. 0% Dec 1977 82, 870 7 ,229 , 800 300 7 ,312 ,970 0. 0% Jan 1978 -0- 8, 631, 000 -0- 8 , 631, 000 0. 0% Feb 1978 -0- 7 ,253, 600 100 7 , 253 ,700 0. 0% Mar 1978 -0- 7 , 667 ,300 100 7, 667 ,400 0. 0% Apr 1978 3, 553, 450 3 ,344 , 000 -0- 6 ,897 ,450 0. 0% Total: 13, 241, 510 66,493,700 7 ,922 , 300 87 , 657 ,510 9. 0% tome Summary of water purchased and/or pumped and water losses : FY Well Lake Oswego Portland Water Losses 1973-74 48% 52% 0% 11. 1% 1974-75 40% 59% 1% 16. 2% 1975-76 39% 59% 2% 7 .4% 1976-77 33% 65% 2% 5. 5% 1977-78 (10 mo) 15% 76% 9% 5. 4% -2- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) wr 10. Work accomplished during April 1978. a. TWD installed 300 feet of 36" D. I. pipe and 300 feet of 24" concrete cylinder pipe (drain line) from 10-MG reservoir to Corylus Court in AMES Subdivision. b. TWD installed 100 feet of 8" D. I. pipe and 200 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 1 fire hydrant near S. W. North Dakota Street to serve 27 existing meter connections previously served by Metzger Water District. Fire hydrant was paid for by developer of NORTHERN PINES consisting of 13 new single family dwellings. c. Private contractor modified pump station at #2 reservoir so that water can be pumped to 10-MG reservoir instead of Hi Tor reservoir. Hi Tor will now be served from pumps located at 132nd and Walnut St. d. TWD installed 31 meters and assumed responsi- bility of 27 existing meters from Metzger Water District along S. W. North Dakota Street. (5445 - 5415) . District also serves 41 meters out-of-district. Total: 5, 513. law 11. Work scheduled to be accomplished during 1978 . May: a. TWD install altitude control valve at #2 reser- voir in preparation of utilizing 10-MG reservoir as the terminal reservoir. b. TWD install 400 feet of 8" D. I. pipe + 4 fire hydrants and an 8" fire sprinkler tap for new lumber facility located on S. W. Hunziker Street, near Western Foundry. (NORTHERN PACIFIC YARDS, PALMER LEWIS, INC. ) c. TWD install 1, 300 feet of 8" D. I. pipe + 2 fire hydrants along S. W. 76th Avenue, north of Durham Road, to serve existing homes in that area. d. TWD install 1, 360 feet of 12" D.I . pipe + 2 fire hydrants along S. W. Beef Bend Road, 123rd to 127th Avenue, to complete circulation loop and serve existing homes . e. TWD install 340 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 1 fire hydrant along S. W. 111th Place, north of Fonner Street, 4,10, for new development of 13 single family dwellings. (WILDERNESS, Sam Gotter) . f. Private contractor install 1 , 060 feet of 6" D.I . pipe and 160 feet of 4" D.I . pipe + 2 fire hydrants along Oakmeadow Lane, near Durham Road and Alderbrook Drive, to serve 35 new single family homes. (SUMMERFIELD #11) . g. TWD install 160 feet of 6" D. I . pipe + 1 fire hydrant along S. W. Gravens Road, east of Pacific Highway to serve two existing houses. -3- ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT (Continued) June: a. TWD install 1st phase (18 homes) for new development of 99 homes located near 115th Avenue, Fairhaven and Terrace Trails, consisting of 540 feet of 8" D. I. pipe and 320 feet of 4" D.I. pipe + 1 fire hydrant along S. W. Genesis, Nova, and Venus Avenues. (GENESIS) . b. TWD install 680 feet of 12" D. I . pipe along S. W. Hazeltree Drive and 440 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 1 fire hydrant along Duchilly Court to serve remaining 19 single family dwellings for Mr. Robert and Gary Ames. (HAZELTREE) . c. TWD install 1" PVC service line to Grange Hall located on Pacific Highway and Watkins Avenue (and move meter) to replace 1" galvanized ("so-called") main. d. Private contractor install 120 feet of 24" concrete cylinder pipe + 1 manhole along Hazeltree Drive to drain 10-MG reservoir into drainage system of HAZEL- TREE Subdivision. "— July: a. TWD install 200 feet of 12" D. I . pipe under Fanno Creek on Durham Road, near 76th Avenue. Also, TWD install 400 feet of 12" D.I. pipe under Fanno Creek on North Dakota Street to complete circulation loop. b. TWD install 1, 300 feet of 12" D. I . pipe + 2 fire hydrants along S. W. 72nd Avenue, Kable to Upper Boones Ferry Road, to serve new commercial development. (EQUITIES NORTHWEST) . c. TWD install 640 feet of 8" D.I. pipe and 850 feet of 6" D.I. pipe along the easterly extension of Sunrise Lane, from B.P.A. to Hi Tor reservoir to complete circulation loop and replace 4" O.D. steel pipe. d. TWD install 640 feet of 8" D. I. pipe along S. W. 141st, south of Bull Mt. Road, and 1,370 feet of 6" D. I . pipe on Bull Mountain Road, east of 141st Avenue, to parallel for pressure and replace 6" O.D. steel pipe. e. Private contractor install 1,250 feet of 8" D. I. pipe, 60 feet of 6" D. I. pipe, and 530 feet of 4" D.I . pipe + 3 fire hydrants for new development of 30 single *, family dwellings located on S. W. 92nd Avenue, north of Sattler Road. (LAUNALYNDA PARK) . -4- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) July (Continued) : f. Private contractor install 1,450 feet of 8" D.I. pipe, 1, 350 feet of 6" D. I. pipe, and 100 feet of 4" D. I. pipe + 4 fire hydrants for new development of 40 single family dwellings located north of Bull Mountain Road, near 117th Avenue. (SHADOW HILLS) g. Private contractor install 1, 040 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 3 fire hydrants for Phase II of ALDERBROOK Apts. (63 units) , and 560 feet of 6" D.I . pipe + 2 fire hydrants for Phase III of ALDERBROOK Apts. (63 units) . (SUMMERFIELD) . August: a. TWD install 2, 260 feet of 12" D. I. pipe + 4 fire hydrants from Fern Steet pump station to 132nd Avenue pump station to parallel for pressure and elim- inate the Fern Street pump station. b. TWD install 60 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 1 fire hydrant to new office building on Sandburg Lane, near 72nd Avenue. c. TWD install 380 feet of 6" D. I . pipe and 110 feet of 4" D. I. pipe + 1 fire hydrant along S. W. View Terrace for new development of 10 houses. (DOUGLAS HEIGHTS) . d. TWD install 1, 030 feet of 8" D. I . pipe, 2, 340 feet of 6" D.I. pipe, and 100 feet of 4" D. I. pipe + 7 fire hydrants for new development of 75 single family homes located along S. W. 92nd Avenue, south of Durham Road, across 92nd Avenue from Tigard High School. (KNEELAND ESTATES, Donald E. Pollack, Inc. ) . e. Private contractor install 990 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 2 fire hydrants for development of 15 single family dwellings on Pathfinder Way, 107th to Walnut St. (YOLO ESTATES) . September: a. TWD install 980 feet of 12" D.I . and 1,400 feet of 6" D. I. pipe along Gaarde, 121st, and access road to #2 reservoir to replace 6" O.D. steel pipe, pressurize 23 homes on Rose Vista Drive, and prepare for service line to 36" D.I. transmission main along S. W. Gaarde Street, including a pressure-reducing valve in vault. b. Private contractor install 900 feet of 8" D. I. pipe and 1, 350 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 3 fire hydrants along S. W. Lakeside Drive, near 98th and Sattler Road, to serve 43 new single family homes . (SUMMERFIELD #12) . -5- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) October: a. Private contractor install 340 feet of 8" D. I. and 140 feet of 4" D. I. pipe to serve 14 single family dwellings along S. W. Highland Drive, east of 109th Avenue. (SUMMERFIELD XI) . Future Developments : a. New Tigard Elementary School: 660 feet of 8" D. I . pipe + 3 fire hydrants near Katherine and 124th Avene. b. Canterbury Woods Apartments : 510 feet of 8" D. I. and 1,100 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 5 fire Units hydrants at 109th and Murdock St. (76 units in 9 separate buildings) 76 c. Morning Hill (formerly Wedgwood) : 335 single family dwellings to be constructed on the Sunamoto Ranch located at S. W. 135th and Walnut Street 335 `ow d. Summer Lake: 148 single family units, 76 duplexes, and 48 multiplex units to be con- structed at the old Stark airport, located at 131st and Scholls Ferry Road 400+ e. Garden Place Park: 18 single family dwellings and 25 duplexes to be constructed north of Gaarde, between 110th and Pacific Highway 68 f. Hambach Park: 15 single family dwellings and 13 duplexes to be constructed along Hall Blvd. , south of Bonita Road 41 g. Scheckla Park Estates: 68 single family dwellings to be constructed on the northwest corner of S. W. Hall Blvd. and Sattler Road 68 h. Tangela Court: 6 duplexes to be constructed along S. W. 95th Avenue, south of Greenburg Road. (290 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 1 fire hydrant) ( Gordon Carpenter) 12 Total: 1,000 -6- RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS , *010 AND LEVYING TAXES 1. BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners, Tigard Water District, hereby adopts the budget approved by the Budget Committee on April 18 , 1978 now on file in the office of the Tigard Water District. 2. BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners, Tigard Water District, hereby levies the taxes provided for in the budget adopted in Paragraph 1 of this resolu- tion in the agregate amount of $176 , 000 and these taxes are hereby levied upon all taxable property within the Tigard Water District as of 1 : 00 a.m. , January 1, 1978 . 3. BE IT RESOLVED that the amount for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1978 , and for the purposes shown below are hereby appropriated as follows : GENERAL FUND Personal Services $ 334 , 200 siAise Material and Services 408 , 200 Capital Outlay 119 , 600 Operating Contingency 10 , 000 Bond Sinking Fund 156 , 000 Net Unappropriated Fund Balance102 , 000 TOTAL: $1 ,130 , 000 BOND SINKING FUND Principal payments (FY1978-79) $ 179 , 000 Interest payments (FY1978-79) 152, 678 Other charges 344 Principal payments (FY1979-80) 56, 000 Interest payments (FY1979-80) 71 ,978 TOTAL: $ 460 , 000 -la- RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET (Continued) :wwrr BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND Personal Services $ -0- Material and Services 10 , 000 Capital Outlay 260 , 000 TOTAL: $270 , 000 4 . BI'. TSI' RESOLVED that: the Bod rd of Commissioners, Tigard Water District, certifies to the county ( I ('r k (or other recording officer) , county assessor (or other assessing officer) of Washington County, Oregon , and the State Tax Commission at its office in Salem, Oregon, the tax levy made by this resolution and shall file with them a copy of the budget as finally adopted. • ADOPTED by the Board of Commissioners, Tigard Water District, on May 9, 1978. Hugh A. Brown Chairman Board of Commissioners • -2a- ( 4 GENERAL FUND BUDGET REPORT ESTIMATE ESTIMATE + OVER 1976-77 1977-78 1976-77 APRIL 1977-78 1976-77 APR. ACCUM. 1977-78 - UNDER ACCOUNT ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET Beginning Working Capital 63,833 111,000 81,470 45,530 47,964 63,833 111,000 129,437 + 18,437 INCOME: 406 Meter Installations 224,925 235,300 24,980 17,400 17,800 184,360 177,500 180,985 + 3,485 407 Line Extension Rebate 1,800 3,000 -0- -0- (360) -0- 3,000 5,764 + 2,764 408 Miscellaneous Income 34,593 9,000 314 750 194 6,964 7,500 2,479 - 5,021 412 Interest Income 369 600 -0- 50 -0- 369 500 -0- - 500 418-419 Water Sales 587,754 651,800 39,535 49,200 41,122 485,487 545,200 501,574 - 43,626 425 Penalties for Non-Pay 340 600 20 50 35 285 500 460 - 40 427 Sale of Equipment -0- 600 -0- 50 -0- -0- 500 -0- - 500 430 Developer's - 10% Overhead 33,505 24,000 1,349 2,000 133 25,223 20,000 19,070 - 930 430-1 Developer's - 8% Engineering 17,950 16,000 -0- 1,000 26 15,767 14,000 13,643 - 357 430-2 Developer's - Equipment 8,174 8,000 35 700 96 7,708 6,600 3,378 - 3,222 430-3 Developer's - Wage Reimbursement 12,142 12,000 85 1,000 252 11,305 10,000 5,562 - 4,438 TOTAL INCOME & WORKING CAPITAL 985,385 1,071,900 147,788 117,730 107,262 801,301 896,300 862,352 - 33,948 EXPENDITURES: Personal Services 500,1,2,3,4 Salaries 159,498 177,904 13,428 14,800 14,251 133,320 148,400 144,201 - 4,199 504-1 Overtime 5,441 7,200 384 600 1,220 4,532 6,000 6,897 + 897 505 Field Labor 26,861 32,996 1,464 2,750 872 20,470 27,500 23,744 - 3,756 506,1,2 Office Employees 20,422 22,200 1,650 1,850 2,327 17,122 18,500 20,000 + 1,502 212,222 240,300 16,926 20,000 18,670 175,446 200,400 194,844 - 5,556 EXPENDITURES: Material & Services 507 Blue Cross of Oregon - Medical 3,426 7,200 269 600 926 2,888 6,000 6,968 + 968 507-1 Bankers Life Nebraska - Dental 880 1,200 27 100 103 719 1,000 897 - 103 508 Retirement 7,663 12,600 2,441 4,050 2,365 8,188 13,500 10,564 - 2,936 509 Social Security 11,473 13,200 990 1,100 1,134 9,321 11,000 10,642 - 358 510 State Accident Insurance Fund 10,305 13,200 -0- -0- -0- 8,308 9,900 9,096 - 804 511 State Unemployment Comp. 2,451 4,800 597 -0- -0- 1,500 3,600 2,081 - 1,519 512 Advertising & Elections 728 600 41 100 41 41 400 58 - 342 514 Equipment Rentals 283 600 23 50 19 756 500 293 - 207 515 General Insurance 16,495 18,000 -0- -0- -0- 16,341 18,000 17,100 - 900 516 Miscellaneous Expenses 2,077 1,800 112 150 130 1,803 1,500 2,029 + 529 517 Dues & Subscriptions 678 900 61 80 117 679 750 796 + 46 518,1,2 Office Supplies 10,126 9,000 1,364 800 966 8,300 7,500 8,374 + 874 519,1,2 Professional Fees 15,732 10,500 1 1,004 1,500 110 15,585 10,500 9,083 - 1,417 520 Meter Maintenance 4,921 6,000 185 500 196 4,001 5,000 2,138 - 2,862 521,1,2,3 Repairs - Lines, Pumps, etc. 4,863 6,000 73 500 109 4,473 5,000 4,769 - 231 t GENERAL FUND BUDGET REPORT (Cont.) ESTIMATE ESTIMATE + OVER 1976-77 1977-78 1976-77 APRIL 1977-78 1976-77 APR. ACCUM. 1977-78 - UNDER ACCOUNT ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET 522,1,2,3 Utilities 6,890 7,200 561 600 598 5,494 6,000 6,054 + 54 523 Fire Hydrant Maintenance 2,078 2,400 15 200 -0- 1,654 2,000 258 - 1 ,742 524 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 5,453 7,200 94 600 275 , 5,061 6,000 7,215 + 1,215 524-1 Gasoline & Oil 6,376 7,200 509 600 662 ; 5,284 6,000 6,226 + 226 524-2 Tires & Batteries 778 1,200 14 100 -0- i 612 1,000 1 ,210 + 210 525,1 Water Costs - Electricity 30,766 36,000 2,117 3,000 2,261 25,999 30,000 24,191 - 5,809 525-2 Water Costs - L. 0. & Portland 100,005 371,600 6,409 14,300 8,703 ! 82,330 332,100 332,161 + 61 526 Interest Expense 984 13,600 ; -0- -0- -0- 984 13,600 13,492 - 108 527 Small Tools 887 1,200 33 100 122 814 1,000 1,585 + 585 529 Rain Gear, Safety Equip. , etc. 1,025 1,200 ! 21 100 -0- 764 1,000 917 - 83 530 Employee Training 433 600 ' -0- 50 -0- 433 500 -0- - 500 247,776 555,000 16,960 29,180 18,837 211,832 493,350 478,197 - 15,153 EXPENDITURES: Capital Outlay 548 Fire Hydrants 2,750 2,400 595 100 -0- 2,750 2,200 1,945 - 255 549 Equipment 73,738 5,000 12,680 500 1,152 72,062 4,000 3,584 - 416 550 Buildings & Additions -0- 900 -0- 900 -0- -0- 900 -0- - 900 551 Meter Installations 38,063 43,300 1,099 3,600 2,734 29,777 36,000 34,669 - 1,331 552 Land & Improvements 8,434 42,000 1,335 -0- -0- 7,841 42,000 41,244 - 756 553 Operating Contingencies -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 554 Line Extensions 1,765 -0- -0- -0- 3,342 -0- -0- 3,342 + 3,342 555 Pipeline Replacements -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 124,750 93,600 15,709 5,100 7,228 112,430 85,100 84,784 - 316 700 Transfer to Bond Sinking Fund 271,200 72,000 22,600 6,000 -0- 226,000 60,000 42,000 - 18,000 Net Fund Balance 129,437 111,000 75,593 57,450 62,527 75,593 57,450 62,527 + 5,077 TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 985,285 1,071 ,900 147,788 117,730 107,262 801,301 896,300 862,352 ; - 33,948 Inventory Balance April 30, 1978 $ 84,194.90 4 BOND SINKING FUND APRIL YTD - 103 Cash balance at first of period 23 353 108 Invested Monies at first of period 121,192 265,307 INCOME: 400 Transfer-in from General Fund -0- 42,000 412 Taxes: Current 681 115,540 413 Delinquent 98 10,018 414 Trailer House -0- -0- 415A Land Sales -0- -0- 418 Interest earned from Invested monies 700 8,247 419 Interest earned from Property Taxes -0- -0- Transfer-in from Invested Monies 9,300 315,000 10,779 490,805 EXPENDITURES: 585 Bond Principal -0- 167,000 586 Bond Interest 9,077 160,660 587 Bank Fees & Postage 175 363 Transfer-to Invested Monies 1,480 163,065 10,732 491,088 CASH BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD 70 70 INVESTED MONIES AT END OF PERIOD 113,372 113,372 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTED MONIES $ 113,442 $ 113,442 ( BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND - Issue 1976 APRIL YTD . 101 Cash balance at first of period (9,987) 55 106 Invested monies at first of period 211 ,356 770,797 235 Due (to)/from General Fund 74,378 (8,524) INCOME: 410 Sale of Bonds -0- -0- 412 Interest Income 1,294 24,603 Transfer-in from Government Pool 44,500 688,250 45,794 712,853 EXPENDITURES: 521 Bond Costs -0- -0- 522 Professional Fees -0- -0- 523 Bond Interest -0- -0- TOTAL MATERIAL & SERVICES -0- -0- 540 Purchase of Land -0- -0- 541 10MG Reservoir @ 125th & Bull Mt. Road 34,473 240,170 542 Major Transmission Lines (Extensions) 17,356 247,562 543 Pipeline Replacements -0- 73,986 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 51,829 561,718 Transfer to Government Pool 1,294 85,602 53,123 647,320 TOTAL CASH BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD 40 40 TOTAL INVESTED MONIES AT END OF PERIOD 168,150 168,150 DUE (TO)/FROM GENERAL FUND 57,022 57,022 $ 225,212 $ 225,212 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT APRIL 30, 1978 WELL RECORDS: 4110,' WELL HOURS STATIC PUMPING CUBIC FEET COSTS-ELECT. HOURS NO. OFF LEVEL LEVEL PUMPS, ETC. 1 1,838,570 $ 253.32 670 2 1,418,600 484.67 675 3 296,280 148.14 674 4 -0- 21. 18 -0- All 7 pump stations & Alarm-telemetry phones 1,343.84 3,553,450 $ 2,261.15 METER RECORDS: ,.. Meters #5,415 through #5,445 = 31 meters sold. BILLING DETAIL: April $ 41,282.50 Delinquent 85.50 6,220,600 cubic feet of water billed. TIGARD WATER DISTRICT April 1, through 30, 1978 SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS GENERAL FUND CHECK# PAYEE AMOUNT ACCOUNT 19786 Northwestern National Life Ins. Co. 3,722.18 508 19787 U. S. Postal Service 500.00 518-1 19788 Phillip H. Wills, Jr. #71-22 840.23 240, (430) 19789 Bureau of Water Works 204.00 201 19790 City of Lake Oswego 19,307.25 201 19791 First National Bank - King City Br. 5.75 201 19792 U. S. National Bank - King City Br. 3.95 201 19793 Consolidated Supply Co. 95.74 201 19794 Loy Clark Pipeline Co. 3,908.00 201 19795 Tualatin Valley Paving, Inc. 150.22 201 19796 Nendel's Inn 11.00 201 19797 Miller Paint Co. , Inc. 63.96 201 19798 Willamette Industries, Inc. 94.75 201 19799 Alaska Steel Co. 844.00 201 19800 Tigard Radiator 18.00 201 19801 Western-Pacific Construction Material Co. 191.60 201 19802 Watt Welding Supply 3.75 201 19803 Cantel Incorporated 60.90 201 19804 Power Rents, Inc. 277.27 201 19805 Grimm's Fuel Co. 159.00 201 19806 Oswego Asphalt Pavers 350.00 201 19807 Hinds Supply Co. 418.70 201 19808 Valley Auto Parts 6.18 201 19809 Dick's Trailer Shop 39.00 201 19810 Coast to Casot Stores .89 201 19811 Homelite Textron 67.18 201 19812 Case Power & Equipment 774.57 201 19813 Tigard Auto Body Works 147.11 201 "e"` 19814 Cornell Manufacturing Co. 37.80 201 19815 Cessco, Inc. 582.00 201 19816 Oregon Asphaltic Paving 52.64 201 19817 Queen Pump Company 3,576.00 201 19818 Southwest Office Supply 55.65 201 19819 Pacific Water Works Supply Co. , Inc. 3,664.20 201 19820 Badger Meter, Inc. 1,166.05 201 19821 Utilities Supply Co. 49.82 201 19822 Carl Diebold Lumber Co. 36.90 201 19823 Sanderson Safety Supply Co. 41. 10 201 19824 Waterworks Supplies Co. 133.67 201 19825 Meter Box Equipment Co. 10.44 201 19826 U. S. Pipe & Foundry Co. 8,863.27 201 19827 Portland Concrete Pipe Co. 3.50 201 19828 Pacific Stationery 81.48 201 19829 L. H. Cobb Crushed Rock 2,423.40 201 19830 Burroughs Corp. 122.84 201 19831 Pacific Paging 29.00 518 19832 Secretarial Answering Service 27.50 518 19833 Everett L. Wiggins 5,727.00 125 19834 Farmcraft, Inc. 33.40 201 19835 The Kiplinger Washington Letter 42.00 517 19836 General Telephone Co. 378.33 520, 525-1 19837 The Times Publications 9.10 512 19838 Douglas R. Smith, Const. 50.00 551 19839 T D C 74-8 (78-4) 177.50 (230-D) , 240, (430) 19840 T D C 72-4 1,233.79 240, (430) 19841 Petty Cash 42.76 516, 518-1, 524, 551 19842 Metzger Water District (SW No. Dakota) 2,000.00 554 19843 Robert E. Santee 636.20 500 19844 Nancy L. Larson 334.98 506 19845 Annie L. Schwartz 270.05 506-1 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT April 1, through 30, 1978 SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS GENERAL FUND (Cont.) CHECK# PAYEE AMOUNT ACCOUNT 19846 Brenda S. Healy 237.02 506-1 19847 John P. Miller 512.21 502 ,a,,. 19848 Russell A. Thomas 391.84 501 19849 William C. Bryant 404.68 504 19850 John C. Dixon 461.96 501-1, 504-1 19851 Harold H. Kuehn 239.08 503-2 19852 Robert M. Adams 213.58 503-1 19853 Donnie R. Foster 317.53 503, 504-1 19854 Randy J. Volk 424.24 502-1, 504-1 19855 Curtis D. Heintz 328.84 503-1, 504-1 19856 Bonnie D. Hall 310.87 501-2 19857 Michael D. Shock 290.30 505 19858 Cash 15.00 516, 521-1 19859 Charlott M. Hillison #19A-249 6.00 121 set 2 19860 Cash 107.75 150, 516, 517, 521-1 19861 Robert E. Santee 686.07 500 19862 Nancy L. Larson 332.22 506, 522-3 19863 Annie L. Schwartz 254.53 506-1, 522-3 19864 Brenda S. Healy 244.78 506-1, 522-3 19865 John P. Miller 547.93 502 19866 Russell A. Thomas 552.63 501, 504-1 19867 William C. Bryant 477.89 504, 504-1 19868 John C. Dixon 593.37 501-1, 504-1 19869 Harold H. Kuehn 185.52 503-2 19870 Robert M. Adams 305.39 503-1, 504-1 19871 Donnie R. Foster 271.78 503, 504-1 19872 Randy J. Volk 504.16 502-1, 504-1 19873 Curtis D. Heintz 344.43 503-1, 504-1 19874 Bonnie D. Hall 298.17 501-2 19875 Michael D. Shock 292.01 504-1, 505 19876 Harvey E. Parsons 56.38 505 19877 Social Security 2,269.28 211, 509 19878 U. S. N. B. - Federal Deposit 3,042.20 212 19879 Department of Revenue 1,111.00 213 19880 Blue Cross of Oregon 926.00 507 19881 Washington County Federal Credit Union 1,522.00 216 19882 Bankers Life Nebraska - Dental 227.28 217, 507-1 19883 Bankers Life Nebraska - Life 81.05 217 19884 Family Cancer Plan Insurance Co. 36.20 218 19885 Portland General Electric 2,232.78 522-2, 525 19886 City of Tigard 15.00 522-3 19887 Rentex Corp. 119.00 522-3 19888 Delta Office Products, Inc. 140.00 518-2 19889 Brewed Hot Coffee, Inc. 24.10 516 19890 Pitney Bowes 40.50 518 19891 Northwest Natural Gas Co. 18.50 522-1 19892 Bureau of Water Works 204.00 525-2 19893 Baltz & Son Co. 116.81 150 19894 Oswego Asphalt Pavers 120.00 150 19895 Utilities Supply Co. 343.50 150 19896 Van Waters & Rogers 110.10 150 19897 West Coast Wire Rope & Rigging Inc. 58.55 150 19898 Chown Hardware & Machinery 26.00 521-2 *ow $87,149.56 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT April 1, through 30, 1978 SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS OTHER FUNDS CHECK# PAYEE AMOUNT ACCOUNT BOND SINKING FUND 231 U. S. National Bank - Trust Division 6,787.50 586, 587 232 First National Bank - Trust Division 2,465.00 586, 587 $ 9,252.50 BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND 155 J. W. Fowler Company 12,000.00 541 156 Richard L. Martin 22,472.75 541 $34,472.75 TWD - GENERAL FUND - FNB 181 TWD - General Fund - USNB $ 29.00 107 Tigard Water District Budget Committee, FY 1978-79 2nd Regular Meeting April 18 , 1978 PRESENT: Board of Commissioners: Hugh A. Brown Clarence F. Nicoli Jerald R. Heater ' R. Verne Wheelwright Appointed Members: Don W. Thomas, Chairman William M. Stebbins, Secretary H. Dale Johnson Raleigh R. Meyer Michael D. O'Neil Absent: Commissioner Gene H. Chamberlin Robert E. Santee, Administrator VISITORS: None °+rw- The meeting was called to order by Chairman Thomas at 7: 34 p.m. Motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the last meeting, as written. Motion carried unanimously. Motion was made by Verne Wheelwright to increase meter installation income by $80 , 000 , such generated revenue to be applied on a line item under capital outlay for pipelines, and that residential meter (3/4") fees be increased by $200 each. Motion died for lack of second. Considerable discussion ensued about meter con- ' nection fees. Motion was made by Michael O'Neil and seconded by Hugh Brown to approve the proposed budget for all funds. (Including General Fund, Bond Sinking Fund, Bond Construction Fund, and tax levy) . Motion car- ried unanimously. %s, Motion was made to adjourn at 9: 40 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. The next meeting, with public hearing, was scheduled for May 9, 1978 at 7 : 30 p.m. William M. Stebbins Secretary Tigard Water District Budget Committee, FY 1978-79 1st Regular Meeting ,,,r,, April 11, 1978 PRESENT: Board of Commissioners : Hugh A. Brown Clarence F. Nicoli Jerald R. Heater R. Verne Wheelwright Appointed Members : H. Dale Johnson William M. Stebbins Don W. Thomas Raleigh R. Meyer Absent: Commissioner Gene H. Chamberlin Michael D. O'Neil Robert E. Santee, Administrator John P. Miller, Foreman Dennis H. Quade, Attorney (Departed 8 : 45 p.m. ) Army VISITORS: None The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Brown at 8 : 00 p.m. Nominations were made and seconded for the following positions: Chairman: Don W. Thomas Secretary: William M. Stebbins Nominations were approved unanimously. The budget message was presented by the Budget Officer, Robert E. Santee. A proposed budget document was presented by the Budget Officer. -1- Budget Committee Meeting April 11, 1978 Meter connection fees were discussed in detail. Chairman Thomas directed the Budget Officer to prepare and submit the following information at the next meeting: (1) Meter connection fees of other water districts and cities. (2) True cost to a new home owner for a water service connection, including meter installation, pipe- line with appurtenances, etc. , (fire hydrants , gate valves, etc. ) . (3) List number of meters installed in past years. (4) List amount of water consumed in prior years. The next meeting of the budget committee was scheduled for 7 :30 p.m. , Tuesday, April 18, 1978 . Motion was made to adjourn at 9 : 52 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. ‘4w. William M. Stebbins Secretary -2- METER CONNECTION FEES Water Dist. or City Meter Size 3/4" 1" 11/2" 2" Tigard Water Dist. $ 500 $ 800 $2, 000 $3, 000 Parkrose Water Dist. 295 395 *T & M T & M Lake Oswego 380 540 980 1, 530 Capitol Hwy W.D. 200 260 Cost +15% Cost + 15% + SDC**to Portland +225 +400 +700 +1,200 Tualatin 460 685 Cost +15% Cost + 15% Portland 548 766 1,540 2, 363 Lake Grove W.D. 600 T&M +15% T&M +15% T&M +15% Metzger Water Dist. 425 550 550 700 + SDC to Portland +225 +400 +700 +1, 200 Beaverton 475 825 T&M T&M + SDC to Portland +180 +320 +560 +960 Wolf Creek Hwy W.D. 525 800 1, 000 1, 500 + SDC to Portland +225 +400 + 700 +1, 200 `"` *Time and Material **SDC = System Development Charge ESTIMATED TRUE COST TO NEW HOME OWNER FOR A WATER SERVICE CONNECTION Assume: 150 feet of property front footage on street. Fire hydrant will serve 10 homes. Estimated Costs: a. Pipeline with appurtenances: 150 feet x $5/ft $750 b. Fire hydrant: 1/10 x $1, 000 100 c. Standard meter installation• 500 Total Estimated Cost: $1, 350 -la- HISTORY OF METER INSTALLATIONS Number of % Inc. Meter % Inc. Meters or Income or Fiscal Year Installed Dec. $ Dec. 1 1969-70 195 -14% $ 20, 500 +29% 1 1970-71 229 +17% 26, 767 +30% 1971-72 328 +43% 42,711 +60% 1 1972-73 272 -17% 46, 989 +10% 1973-74 284 + 4% 76, 659 +63% 1974-75 221 -22% 90 , 383 +18% 1975-76 302 +37% 142, 573 +58% 1976-77 382 +26% 224 , 925 +58% 1977-78 385 + 1% 230 ,300 + 2% (3 mo. est. ) 1978-79 416 + 8% 264 , 800 +15% (Estimated) Note: The column "Number of meters installed" lists all sizes of meters installed. Thus, the percentage of increase or decrease for number of meters installed versus meter income will not be consistent because of the wide variation in costs for different sized meters. tow HISTORY OF WATER SALES Water Water Consumption Percent Sales Percent Fiscal Year Cubic Feet Increase $ Increase 1966-67 32, 925, 600 +16% $109, 268 +22% 1967-68 39 , 840 ,300 +21% 131, 508 +20% 1968-69 42,447 , 800 + 7% 141, 817 + 8% 1969-70 48 ,347, 300 +14% 192, 014 +35% (new rates 1970-71 57, 676, 000 +19% 255,130 +33% 1971-72 58, 044, 500 + 1% 266 , 411 + 4% 1972-73 70, 076, 200 +21% 332 , 384 +25% (new rates 1973-74 76, 536,400 + 9% 373,332 +12% 1974-75 88, 815, 100 +16% 437 ,178 +17% 1975-76 89, 097, 500 + 1% 538 , 606 +23% (new rates 1976-77 95,707, 100 + 7% 582, 603 + 8% 1977-78 98, 578, 300 + 3% 601, 600 + 3% (3 mo.est. 1978-79 113, 365, 000 +15% 691 , 800 +15% (Estimated Note: Please note that the percentage increases for water consumption and dollar value have a relatively close corre- lation, except when rate increases occur. This is so because each unit of water (100 cubic feet) is sold for the same rate to all customers. -2a- METER CONNECTION CHARGES December 2, 1975 Everyone would agree that new meter connections impose an additional load upon the water system. This added burden eventually results in the need for increased reservoir capacity, larger transmission mains , more pump stations, additional treatment plant facilities , etc. However, the entire burden cannot be placed upon new connections because part of the higher water consumption is due to increased water use by individuals already on the system. A municipal water system requires "x" number of dollars to operate and remain solvent. Obviously, meter connection charges must bear a part of the burden. It is a matter of opinion and judgment of the governing body to determine how much of the total cost of the system should be borne by meter connection charges. Federal and State laws prescribe, and the courts have ruled, that charges must be reasonable, and not arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory. Most water purveyors utilize meters to determine the quantity of water consumed. Meters are rated by safe operating capacity (gallons per minute) as shown below: Size of Meter Safe Operating Capacity 5/8" x 3/4" (standard) 20 GPM 1" 50 GPM 12" 100 GPM 2" 160 GPM 3" 320 GPM 4" 500 GPM �..• 6" 1000 GPM 8" 1600 GPM -1- METER CONNECTION CHARGES (Continued) `o' Thus, if one knows the anticipated capacity of a potential user, a meter can be sized properly. It would seem to be a relatively simple task to determine the number and types of water fixture units and convert those figures to flow rate (gallons per minute) which, in turn, reflects the correct meter size. The validity of this concept will be discussed later, but, first, a review of a few other methods of determining meter connection charges will be presented. a. Charges per dwelling unit. One of the most common methods of charging for meter connections is based upon the number of "dwelling units" . For example: a 100-unit apartment, utilizing one large meter, should be charged 100 times some arbitrary unit dollar amount. This is often compared to the single Now family dwelling. It is an effort to offset the apparent inequity in charges because 100 individual meters were not installed. The "per unit" charge is supposed to correct this deficiency. Many persons believe that apartment owners do not pay a high enough proportion of the total cost of the ' water system. Therefore, a charge "per unit" is con- sidered justified. The courts have ruled that such charges are arbitrary and capricious. (Ref: Circuit Court of Oregon case, dated March 15, 1973, Franklin Service Corporation vs Progress Water District) . In my judgment, the charges are also discriminatory. Why does a water purveyor single out only the multiple dwelling owner? One must realize that the construction of an apart- ment house is a commercial venture, no different from a bank, shopping center, car wash, hospital, etc. -2- METER CONNECTION CHARGES (Continued) gay To initiate or continue utilizing this method to gain additional revenue, solely at the expense of the apartment owner, is obviously illegal. In this regard, I am firmly convinced that that portion of Portland' s system development charge, based upon a "per unit" schedule is clearly illegal and can be challenged in court. b. Charges per equivalent dwelling unit. Another method of computing charges for meter connections is based on "equivalent dwelling units" . It is an attempt to equate large water consumers to a number of single family dwellings. This method is cer- tainly an improvement upon the "per dwelling unit" charge which is applicable only to apartment owners . This, too, has been challenged in court and held to be """ valid. (Circuit Court of Oregon case, dated October 28 , 1974 , Dave Christensen, Inc. vs Wolf Creek Highway Water 1 District) . The objection to this method is the apparent in- justice in establishing criteria for "equivalent dwelling units" . For example: Wolf Creek' s schedule equates 2. 5 hospital beds or 25 pews in a church to one single family dwelling. This is an opinion and certainly there are no facts to support this conclusion. The equivalent dwelling units are arbitrarily established and may or may not have 4 a bearing on potential water demand. This causes a pur- chaser of a meter to question the validity of the charges . While Wolf Creek' s schedule was held to be justified in court, I believe there is a better way to obtain fairness in meter connection charges, but, at the same time, receive a just monetary return for the demand placed upon the water %N.. system. -3- METER CONNECTION CHARGES (Continued) Now In the case of the Unified Sewerage Agency, sewer water is not metered, therefore, their system of charges based upon "equivalent dwelling units" appears to be their only solution and fully justifiable. They also use a schedule of water fixture units (equivalents) for commer- cial buildings and laundromats. c. Charges per equivalent fixture units. Meter installationsmust bear a fair share of the total financial burden of the water system. It would appear that the relative cost of a meter installation should be based upon how much the water system is taxed by that particular meter connection. Mechanical means (the meter) are available to accurately measure the amount of that potential demand upon the system. Knowing the anticipated flow capacity (gallons per minute) , the correct meter size can easily be determined. Therefore, it would seem logical that meter size should dictate the charge for a meter connection. For example: a 2-inch meter has a flow rate capacity of 8 times that of a standard 5/8" x 3/4" meter. Therefore, it would not be unreasonable to charge 8 times the cost of a standard meter installation. The potential flow rate taxes the system, not the number of apartments or equiva- lent dwelling units. Applying the multiple factors based on flow rate of the standard meter would result in meter charges as shown on the next page. (Also shown as a comparison are Port- land' s per unit charges for multiple dwellings) . -4- METER CONNECTION CHARGES (Continued) ^wrw Safe Multiple of Potential *Number Portland' s Size of Operating Standard Fair Present of Apt per Unit Meter Capacity Meter Charges Charges Units Charge 5/8" x 3/4" 20 GPM 1 $ 450 $ 450 1 ---- 1" 50 GPM 22 1,125 550 2-4 $ 400- $600 11/2" 100 GPM 5 2 ,250 1, 200 5-15 750- 2250 2" 160 GPM 8 3, 600 1 ,400 16-36 2400- 5400 3" 320 GPM 16 7, 200 3, 000 37-100 5550-15000 4" 500 GPM 25 11,250 5, 000 101-. . . 15000- 6" 1000 GPM 50 22 , 500 6,000 ---- ---- 8" 1600 GPM 80 36,000 7 ,000 ---- ---- * Number of units is based upon the peak instantaneous residential demands as prescribed by the Oregon State Health Division. (As a result of this study the meter connection charges were increased to the following amounts on January 1, 1976 : ) Size of Meter Cost 5/8" x 3/4" $ 500 1" 800 11" 2,000 2" 3, 000 3" 6,000 4" 10 , 000 6" 18 , 000 8" 28, 000 The merit of this schedule versus the others discussed is the fact that charges for meters are based on potential demand upon the system which can be accurately computed and measured. Engineering data are available to verify the poten- tial water consumption. Meters can be flow tested for accuracy and reliability if a doubt should occur. -5- METER CONNECTION CHARGES (Continued) The paramount issue here is to determine the correct meter size which is dependent upon the flow rate (gallons per minute) required by the water facilities located within a building. Again, engineers (American Society of Mechani- cal Engineers, ASME) have come to the rescue with a schedule of "equivalent fixture units" . For example: a private bath uses 2 "fixture units" ; a water closet uses 3 "fixture units" , etc. The sum of the number of fixture units of a building is used in establishing the demand (gallons per minute) upon the system. Simply stated, the procedure is as follows: a. Calculate the total number of (water) fixture units. b. Extract from a graph (ASME) the demand (gallons per minute) . """` c. The "gallons per minute" dictate the meter size. In conclusion, most would agree that the potential large users, including apartment owners, are not paying their proportionate fair share of the financial burden. This can be corrected by charging substantially higher amounts to all potential users for the connection of the larger meters. In this manner, apartment owners and other types of commercial enterprises who are capable of consuming large volumes of water are all charged a like amount, based solely on potential water demand. Robert E. Santee Administrator/Engineer Now -6- Tigard Water District 4-78 Regular Meeting April 11, 1978 mow PRESENT: Hugh A. Brown, Chairman Clarence F. Nicoli, Treasurer Jerald R. Heater, Secretary R. Verne Wheelwright (7 :41 p.m. ) Robert E. Santee, Administrator John P. Miller, Foreman Dennis H. Quade, Attorney VISITORS: None. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Brown at 7 : 34 p.m. Motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the last meeting, as written. Motion carried unani- mously. wr.- Motion was made and seconded to pay the vouchers. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Brown officially appointed the Administrator, Robert Santee, as the alternate to Verne Wheelwright to represent the district at all meetings of the Willamette River Water Source Committee. Jerald Heater suggested that the Administrator be authorized to hire the services of a photographer and obtain picturesof the district' s facilities to hang in the office. He stated that he thought the construction of the 10-MG reservoir was quite a feat and it should be appropriately shown to the public. Consideration should be given to have "opening day" ceremonies when the tank is fully operational. Motion was made to adjourn at 7 :48 p.m. w. BUDGET MESSAGE FY 1978-79 wow TIGARD WATER DISTRICT During the present fiscal year the water district has been on the accrual versus cash basis in its account- ing and budgetary method. This method of accounting commenced on July 1, 1975 and employs the generally accepted principles for an operating utility enterprise. The accrual method of accounting will again be utilized for the new fiscal year 1978-79, beginning July 1, 1978. The financial policies of the water district will remain essentially the same as in past years. Prior to submitting a proposed budget it would be appropriate to review the major decisions and accom- plishments of the past fiscal year. Significant events have occurred which make this year' s (1977-78) budget look like a disaster area. In the preparation of the budget last April there was every indication that the financial status of the water district would be out- standing. One member of the budget committee even sug- gested that water rates by reduced. Unfortunately, two specific events occurred during the year which changed the situation drastically. These were: (1) . A decision on October 4 , 1977 by the Court of Nay Appeals to reverse a favorable decision by the Circuit Court on the water district' s lawsuit with the City of -1- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) Lake Oswego over wholesale water rates. Subsequently, the Oregon State Supreme Court refused to hear the case, thereby exhausting all avenues of appeal. The case was lost. Consequently, retroactive payments, plus interest, from July 1, 1975, totaling $272,100 had to be derived from this year' s budgeted funds (General Fund) . The district' s total annual budget is about $1 million, so one can readily imagine the severe impact upon the finan- cial status of the district. In addition, since these liabilities and charges were not budgeted for in FY 1976-77 , the auditor' s report for that period expressed a "qualified" opinion as to the financial position of the district. (2). As a result of the unusual drought conditions last year, and the subsequent declaration by elected offi- cials to conserve water, income from water sales increased by only 3% versus the normal 12% to 25% . Since income from water sales constitutes over half the revenue of the dis- trict, the conservation program had a deleterious effect upon anticipated revenues. (This is not to say that con- servation methods should not be encouraged) . While these events have had an adverse effect upon the district' s financial position, the over-all status of the district is not that grim. In other words , the district has enough flexibility to absorb such set-backs, and still achieve the goals and objectives established. Some of the brighter achievements during the past year are listed as follows : -2- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) a. Storage: low Completion of a 10-MG reservoir which will meet the needs of the district until about 1990. b. Distribution: The pipeline replacement program continued on schedule and should essentially be finished within the next year. The entire distribution system will consist of either cast or ductile iron pipelines with excellent pressures through- out the system. c. Source: Elected officials representing six different govern- mental bodies, including Tigard Water District, are meeting monthly for the purpose of considering a proposal to jointly develop the Willamette River at Wilsonville as a source of water. Within 6 months a decision should be reached whether to proceed with such a venture. Other alternatives could include a "buy-in" to the City of Lake Oswego (Clackamas River) system or continued purchases of surplus water from the City of Portland (Bull Run) . The proposed budget recommends no increase in consumer user rates or meter connection charges. These rates and charges were last increased in April 1975. It is proposed that the advalorem tax rate remain the same at 42 per $1, 000 assessed valuation. It is emphasized -3- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) that actual dollars to be paid by each patron (property owner) may not be the same because of the continual in- crease in assessed valuation of real property. Because of this, the actual amount to be received from taxes will be about $160, 000, an increase of $25,400. These funds, together with the remaining balance in the Bond Sinking Fund, and a transfer of $156, 000 from the General Fund, will be earmarked for payment of bonded indebtedness which will total $3, 018, 000 on June 30, 1978 . Thus , funds needed to pay the annual premiums for bonded in- debtedness will be shared about equally between taxes and user fees. Because the General Obligation bond issues, and resultant taxation authority, were previously approved by the patrons at the polls, there is no require- 4410, ment to acquire voter approval to request the necessary taxes to balance the budget. It is noted that the amount of taxes to be generated this year is derived "backwards" since limits have been imposed on the district. During the solicitation of the $1. 9 million bond measure in May 1976, the Board of Com- missioners pledged that there would be no increase in the tax rate if the bond measure passed at the polls. (This established a maximum figure) . On the other hand, as one studies the budget document, it becomes obvious that the district needs every available tax dollar to balance the budget. (This establishes a minimum figure) . (Ergo: 42 per $1, 000 assessed valuation) . -4- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) There is a bright note about the district' s bonded indebtedness. Commencing in November 1979, and each sub- sequent 3 years thereafter, the first of several bond issues will mature and be liquidated. This will take a substantial burden off annual budgets in the future. The proposed budget will be austere with no frills. It becomes apparent that rate increases will be necessary next year if the district is to remain solvent. It is recommended that the staff make an in-depth study of all sources of revenue, including user rates, meter charges, out-of-district rates, etc. An effective date of April 20 , 1979 for the rate increases is considered realistic and the public should be so alerted. wow Our patrons still enjoy the lowest water rates of all adjacent water districts and cities, except Portland, as shown below: Average Monthly Water Bill* Portland $ 4 . 60 Tigard Water Dist8. 04 **Metzger Water Dist8 . 39 **Lake Oswego 10. 21 Tualatin 11. 89 Lake Grove W.D 14 . 80 * Includes taxes ($40,000 home) ** Have held public hearings to increase water rates. Summarized preliminary budget documents for the General Fund and Bond Construction Fund have been prepared for the next fiscal year and are shown on the opposite side of this folder. Supporting documents are also enclosed following -5- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) this budget message. It is emphasized that the budget document is a financial guide only, and when approved and adopted, legally authorizes the Board of Commissioners to expend funds in specific categories. It does not autho- rize the staff to expend any funds. Approval of individual appropriations is accomplished at regular monthly meetings by the Board of Commissioners. Following is a listing of the major items in the budget: GENERAL FUND Income Beginning Balance $102 , 000 9% Meter Installations 264 ,800 24% ""'' Water Sales 691,800 61% Miscellaneous 71, 400 6% Total Income: $1,130 ,000 100% Expenditures Salaries & Fringes $ 334 , 200 30% Water Costs 282, 500 25% Meter Installations 47 , 400 4% Bond Sinking Fund 156 , 000 14% Miscellaneous 207 ,900 18% Ending Balance 102 , 000 9% Total Exp. : $1,130 , 000 100% All remaining funds ($207 ,200) in the Bond Construc- tion Fund will be expended during the upcoming fiscal year. The Board of Commissioners has approved, and the em- 44mor ployees have accepted, a 9% basic salary increase for the next fiscal year. (The Consumer Price Index for the Port- -6- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) land Metropolitan area is 8. 99%) . The employees of the district are not unionized. Also approved, for inclusion in the budget, is the purchase of a new dump truck and the hiring of a third office girl. While the storage capacity of the district is ample until about 1990 , provision has been made in this budget to purchase (or obtain options to purchase) land for two reservoir sites near S. W. 150th Avenue, between Beef Bend Road and Bull Mountain Road. The Stevens, Thompson & Runyan engineering study of 1971 advised that 23 million gallons (MG) of storage would be needed by year 2000 . This is shown as follows: Storage On Hand 17 MG #3 (own land) 1 MG Hi Tor (own land) 1 MG 150th & Bull Mt. Road 2 MG (need land) 150th & Beef Bend Road 2 MG (need land) Total: 23 MG The purchase of a computerized billing machine and a generator for auxiliary power which were recommended last year are not included in the new budget. These items will have to wait until future years. Looking ahead to FY 1979-80 , the district' s only real internal weaknesses are installation of direct, major trans- '► mission mains from both Lake Oswego and Portland to the new 10-MG reservoir, and a new pump station at the 10-MG reservoir -7- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) to serve the Hi Tor reservoir. The transmission mains needed would be "connecting links" to existing transmission pipelines. Costs for these projects are estimated as follows: (1) . S. W. Gaarde, 121st to Pacific Highway: 3, 500' of 36" D. I. pipe @ $70/ft $245,000 3, 500 ' of 12" D.I. pipe @ $20/ft (to replace 6" O.D. steel) 70,000 Sub-total: $315,000 (2) . S. W. Tiedeman and North Dakota Street to 121st and Gaarde Street: 10, 000 ' of 24" D.I . pipe @ $50/ft500 , 000 (3) . Pump Station at 10-MG Reservoir: Complete pump station with accessories. . 100 ,000 wr. Total: $915, 000 The need for these additional facilities is not urgent, and the costs may be too much without a bond issue. However, as an alternative, consideration might be given to completing some of these capital improvements from the General Fund in future years. It could be accomplished in increments over a period of years . The proposed budget is fiscally responsible, fair to both the patrons and employees, and will provide sufficient funds to further the short range and long range goals of the district. -8- BUDGET MESSAGE (Continued) One can claim a major victory whenever consumer rates remain the same, and are not increased. All one need do is compare water rates with those of other public utilities , such as PGE, General Telephone, Northwest Natural Gas, etc. , and note their constant need to increase rates for their services . Certainly, water districts are not immune to the inflationary spiral anymore than other businesses. Finally, while other water districts and cities are presently consid- ering consumer rate increases, including a contemplated wholesale rate increase of 28% by the City of Portland next year, Tigard Water District' s patrons can enjoy superb ser- vice and high quality water at the lowest rates in Washington County. Many households get by on 10 per day for all their water needs. What a bargain! Respectfully submitted, / : —AOr� Robert E. Santee Budget Officer -9- F C - „. _:. ARD WATER DISTRICT PROPOSED GENERAL FUND B I" - 7"S'---9 1976-77 1977-78 MAR 31/ '78 JUNE 30, 1972 FYI97E-7" A:-..=T= ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ESTIMATE ACTUAL BUDGET Beginning Working Capital 63,833 111,000 129,437 129,437 102,000 INCOME 406 Meter Installations 224,925 235,300 163,185 230,300 264,800 Line Extension Rebate 1,800 3,000 6,124 6,400 7,200 Miscellaneous Income 34,593 9,000 2,285 2,963 3,000 --2 Interest Income 369 600 -0- -0- 600 8-419 Water Sales 587,754 651,800 460,452 601,600 691,800 425 Penalties for Non-Pay 340 600 425 600 600 427 Sale of Equipment -0- 600 -0- -0- 600 430 Developer's - 10% Overhead 33,505 24,000 18,937 26,000 26,40C 430-1 Developer's - 8% Engineering 17,950 16,000 13,617 18,000 18,000 430-2 Developer's - Equipment 8,174 8,000 3,282 5,000 6,000 430-3 Developer' s - Wage Reimb. 12,142 12,000 5,310 8,000 9,00G TOTAL INCOME AND WORKING CAPITAL 985,385 1,071,900 803,054 1,02.8,300 1,130,000 EXPENDITURES: Personal Services 500,1,2,3,4 Salaries 159,498 177,904 129,950 174,000 198,000 504-1 Overtime 5,441 7,200 5,677 7,800 10,200 505 Field Labor 26,861 32,996 22,872 31,200 33,000 505,1,2 Office Employees 20,422 22,200 17,675 24,000 34,200 507 Blue Cross -- Medical 3,426 7,200 6,042 8,900 12,000 507-1 Bankers Life Neb. --Dental 880 1,200 794 1,100 1,200 508 NW Nat. Life -- Retirement 7,663 12,600 8,199 10,850 10,800 509 Social Security 11,473 13,200 9,508 13,100 16,800 510 State Accident Insurance 10,305 13,200 9,096 11,800 14,400 511 State Unemployment Comp. 2,4514 800 2,081 2,350 3,600 Tocol . h,r:;on,11 Ser.vice:3 248,420 292,500 211 ,894 285,100 334,2(0) 4100iPENDITURES: Materials & Services 512 Advertising & Elections 728 600 17 200 600 514 Equipment Rentals 283 600 274 400 600 515 General Insurance 16,495 18,000 17,100 17,100 19,200 516 Miscellaneous Expenses 2,077 1,800 1,899 2,800 3,000 517 Dues & Subscriptions 678 900 679 900 900 518,1 Office Supplies 10,126 9,000 7,408 10,000 10,800 519,1 Professional Fees 15,732 10,500 8,973 11,000 12,000 520 Meter Maintenance 4,921 6,000 1,942 3,000 4,800 521,1 Repairs -Lines, Pumps, etc. 4,863 6,000 4,660 6,400 6,000 522,1 Utilities 6,890 7,200 5,456 7,200 7,800 523 Fire Hydrant Maintenance 2,078 2,400 258 600 1,200 524 Truck & Equip. Maintenance 5,453 7,200 6,940 8,400 8,400 524-1 Gasoline & Oil 6,376 7,200 5,564 7,400 7,800 524-2 Tires & Batteries 778 1,200 1,210 1,600 1,800 525,1 Water Costs - Electricity 30,766 36,000 21,930 32,000 36,000 525-2 Water Costs - L.O. & Port. 100,005 371,600 323,458 385,000 282,500 526 Interest Expense 984 13,600 13,492 13,500 600 527 Small. Tools 887 1,200 1,463 2,400 2,400 529 Rain Gear, Safety Equip. 1,025 1,200 917 1, 200 1,200 530 Employee Training 433 600 -0- 100 600 Total: Material & Services 211,578 502,800 423,640 511,200 408,200 -XPENDITURES: Capital Outlay '8 Fire Hydrants 2,750 2,400 1,945 2,000 2,400 q!'49 Equipment 73,738 5,000 2,432 3,500 28,000 550 Buildings & Additions -0- 900 -0- -0- 3,600 551 Meter Installations 38,063 43,300 31,935 41,200 47,400 552 Land & Improvements 8,434 42,000 41,244 41, 3 .,7 13,- ?,- 554 Line Extensions 1,765 -0- -0- - _ . _ - _ 555 Pipeline Replacements -0- -0- -0- 1 , ` Total: Capital Outlay 124,750 93,600 77,556 88,000 119,E 553 Operating Contingency -0- -0- -0- -0- _ Transfer to Bond Sinking 271,200 72,000 42,000 42,00' - Balance 129/437 I,14t.Qw 47,964 ' -- : : _ _ :. 77-:-:Ti:,. _ _7 ... ' . 7N-DING BALANCE 985,385 1,071,900 803,054 , : 1 , . - - _ .._ BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND (April to June 1978) April 1 , 1978 Resources Available funds on hand $275 , 750 Interest Income 4 , 250 Total Resources: $280, 000 Requirements (April - June 1978) 10-MG Reservoir: R. L. Martin $ 2 , 600 Backfill + 36" cover20, 000 Alt. control valves 8 ,000 Convert pump @ #2 res6, 000 Electrical 4 , 000 $40, 600 Transmission Mains : 10-MG Reservoir to Corylus : • 280 ' of 36" D. I . and 24" concrete cyl. pipe 9 , 000 120 ' of 24" concrete cylinder pipe on Hazeltree Street 1, 400 Durham Road, 76th to 79th Ave: 600 ' of 12" D. I. @' $15/ft 9 , 000 North Dakota connection: 100' of 8" D.I . @ $10/ft. 1 ,000 100 ' of 6" •D. I. @ $8/ft. . 800 1, 800 Beef Bend Road, 123rd to 127th: 1, 360 ' of 12" D. I. @ $15/ft. 20 ,400 Less : Rebates : 9 ,400 11, 000 Sub-total Requirements: $ 72, 800 Unfunded Balance: 207 , 200 NNW Total Requirements : $280 , 000 BC-1 BONO CONSTRUCTION FUND BUDGET FY 1978 - 79 Resources Available Funds on hand $ 207 , 200 Interest Income 2 , 800 Total Resources: $210, 000 Requirements 10-MG Reservoir: • R. L. Martin (Retainer) . . . . $50 , 000 Telemetry 5, 000 Cyclone fence 2 ,000 Improve 125th Avenue 5, 000 Curbs 500 Bike path 500 Street lights (2) 1, 200 Landscaping, trees , etc2, 500 $66, 700 Transmission Mains : North Dakota St . @ RR: 300 ' of 12" D. T . 0 $15/ft (4 , 500) + Fanno Creek crossing 9 , ')00 Durham Road @ 74th Avenue: 300' of 12" D.I . @ $15/ft (4 , 500) + Fanno Creek crossing 9 , 500 }3i Hi Tor Res. to B.P.A. 640 ' of 8" D. I . @ $10/ft. . . 6,400 850' of 6" D. I. @ $8/ft. . . . 6, 800 13 , 200 141st and Bull Mt. Road: 640' of 8" D. I. @ $10/ft. . . 6, 400 1, 370 ' of '6" D. I . @ $8/ft. . 10,900 17 , 300 Gaarde and Rose Vista: 980 ' of 12" D. I. @ $15/ft. . 14 , 700 1, 400 ' of 6" D. I . @ $8/ft. . 11,200 PRV & control valves 3, 500 29 , 400 Fern St. pump station to 132nd St. pump station: 2 ,260 ' of 12" D. I . @ $15/ft 33 , 900 11411.1 Duchilly to 121st and Gaarde: 700 ' of 36" D.T . @ $70/ft 49 , 000 Sub-total Requirements: $228 ,500 General Fund Transfer: Total Requirements : $210,000 BC-2 METER INSTALLATION INCOME (Account 4406) 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Month ActualActual Estimated (+ 15 % �- ) Ex es July $ 11, 200 $ 9 , 300 $ 10 ,700 $ 10 , 70{) August 13 , 500 18 , 200 20 , 900 31 , 600 September 20, 850 24 , 000 27 , 600 59 , 200 October 28 , 600 13 , 600 15, 600 74 , 800 November 15, 300 25 ,100 28 , 900 103 ,700 December 21 , 690 10 ,130 11 , 600 115 , 300 January 9 , 000 11 , 500 13, 200 128 , 500 February 23, 340 20,155 23 , 200 151 , 700 March 15, 300 31, 200 35 , 900 187 , 600 Total: (9 months) 159 , 380 163, 185 1\s;dame 1\pri1. 24 , 980 25 , 585 29 , 400 21 7 , 00() May 31, 765 32 , 530 37 , 400 254 , 400 June 8 , 800 9 , 000 10 , 400 264 , 800 TOTAL: $2.24 , 925 $230,300 $264 , 800 ++++++++++++++±+++±+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ HISTORY OF METER INSTALLATIONS Fiscal Year Meter Income % Increase 1969-70 $ 20, 500 --- 1970-71 26, 767 +30% 1971-72 42, 711 +60% 1972-73 46 , 989 +10% 1973-74 76 , 659 +63% 1974-75 90 , 383 +18% 1975-76 142 , 573 +58% 1976-77 224 , 925 +58% 1977-78 230, 300 + 2% (3 mo. est. ) 1978-79 264, 800 +15% (Estimated) -1a- WATER SALES (Account #418-41.9) 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total ` Month Actual Actual. Estimated (+15%) Extension July $ 56, 008 $ 60 , 745 $ 69 , 900 $ 69 , 900 August 64 , 115 70 , 361 80, 900 150 , 800 September 58 , 193 68 , 043 78 , 300 22.9 , 100 October 50, 230 45 , 776 52 , 700 281 , 200 November 45 , 542 46, 241 53 , 200 335 , 000 December 44 , 378 39 , 672 45, 600 380 , 600 January 43, 776 44 , 213 50 , 800 431, 400 February 43, 298 43 , 641 50 , 200 481 , 600 March 40 , 412 41, 760 48 , 000 529 , 600 Total: (9 months) 445 , 952 460 ,452 T1: s;nme 3 . ,")% Inc. *440" April 39 , 535 40, 820 46 , 900 576 , %>fl0 May 45 , 595 47 , 100 54 , 100 630 , 600 June 51, 521 53 , 228 61 , 200 691 , 800 TOTAL: $582 , 603 $601, 600 $691, 800 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++f++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ HISTORY OF WATER SALES Fiscal Year Water Sales S Increase 1966-67 $ 109 , 268 +22% 1967-68 131, 508 +20% 1968--69 141 , 817 + 8`.; 1969-70 192 , 014 +35% 1970-71 255, 130 +33' (Incl . new rates`, 1971-72 266 , 411 + 4% 1972-73 332, 384 +25% (Incl . new rates) 1973-74 373 , 332 +12% 1974-75 437 , 178 +17% 1975-76 538 , 606 +23% (Incl. new rates) 1976-77 582, 603 + 8% 1977-78 601, 600 + 3% (Last 3 mo. est. ) 1978-79 691 , 800 +15% (Estimated) -2a- WATER COSTS (Account #525-2) '*w 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total Month Actual Actual F stimatod (+15%) Extension July $ 20 , 238 $ 26 , 847 $ 30 , 900 $ 30 , 900 August 22 , 279 31 , 314 3r, , 000 66 , 900 September 14 , 633 16 , 870 19 , 400 86, 300 October 12 , 288 13, 499 15, 500 101 , 800 1 November 11,798 18 , 284 21 , 000 122 , 800 December 11, 098 18 ,418 21, 200 144 , 000 January 14 , 386 21, 920 25 , 200 169 , 200 February 11 ,702 18 , 477 21, 200 190 , 400 March 1.2 , 561 19 , 511 22 ,400 212 , 800 Total : (9 months) 130 ,983 185 ,140 Assume 444%., 41-9, Inc. April 11, 423 16, 110 18 , 500 231 , 300 May 13, 470 19 , 000 21 , 900 253 , 200 June 18, 050 25, 450 29 , 300 282 , 500 TOTAL: $173, 926 $245,700 $282 , 500 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++4-++++++++++++++++++++++ HISTORY OF WATER COSTS Fiscal Year Water Costs % Increase 1968-69 $ 1 , 356 --- 1969-70 4 , 644 +242% 1970-71 27 , 215 +486% 1971-72 31, 060 + 14% 1972-73 60 , 623 + 95% 1973-74 73 , 200 ± 21% 1974-75 87 , 107 + 19% ' 111975-76 153 , 008 + 76 (Aclj . for ' 1976-77 173 , 926 + 14o rate inc. ) 1977-78 245,700 + 41`.'s (3 mo. est. ' 1978-79 282 , 500 - =_- . 'Estim<<'-'_. -3a- METER INSTALLATION EXPENSE (Account #551) 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 Sub-Total Month Actual Actual Estimated (+15%) Extension Now July $ 1 , 112 $ 2 , 292 $ 2 , 600 $ 2 , 600 August 2 , 696 1 , 976 2 , 300 4 , 900 September 7 , 423 4 , 4 5 , 600 10 , 500 October 3 , 751 8 , 245 9 , 500 20 , 000 November 6 , 425 2 , 417 2 , 800 22 , 800 December 3 , 354 1 , 658 1 , 900 24 ,700 January 791 4 , 966 5, 700 30, 400 February 1, 918 1, 560 1 , 800 32 , 200 March 1, 208 3, 937 4 , 500 36 , 700 Total: (9 months) 28, 678 31, 935 Assume 11 Int?. April 1 , 099 1, 220 1 , 500 38 , 200 Now May 3, 325 3 , 690 4 , 200 42 , 400 June 3 , 92.8 4 , 355 5 , 000 47 ,400 TOTAL: $37 , 030 $41, 200, $47 , 400 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ HISTORY OF METER INSTALLATION EXPENSE Fiscal Year Meter Installation Expense % Inc. or Dec . 1968-69 $ 18 , 710 --- 1969-70 11 , 825 -37% 1970-71 13 , 544 +15% 1971-72 20 , 441 +51 1972-73 30, 979 +52% 1973-74 27 , 883 -10% 1974-75 26 , 326 - 6% 1975-76 28, 907 +10% 1976-77 37 , 030 +28% 1977-78 41 , 200 +1.1% (3 mo .est) 1978-79 47 , 400 +15% (Est. ) Now -4a- ( ( I PROPOSED A PS ; - 7 , FY 1978-79 ears Present Proa`;os: d (9? ? 51w: . ) Hourly Field Personnel Age , �:•,-= Month Annual 'o��h - .•: Tinu,_i1_ Wage 1. Admin.;Engineer (�. E. Santee) 54 - _ $2 , 200 $26 , 400 2 , => jr; $? , 300 00 ---- 2 . Foreman (John Miller) 32 13 1, 950 23 , 400 2 , 1")6 25 , 512 ---- 3. Leadman (Russell Thomas) 34 121 1 , 387 16 , 640 1 , 512 18 , 144 $8 . 72 4 . Leadman (John Dixon) 51 6 1 ,387 16 , 640 1, 512 18 , 144 8 . 72 5 . Inv. Cont. & Meter Reader (B. Bryant) 59 11� 1 , 274 15 , 288 1, 390 16 , 680 8 . 02 6 . Waterworks Opr. #1 (Randy Volk) 31 3 1 , 274 15 , 288 1, 390 16 , 680 8 . 02 7 . Waterworks Opr. #1 (Donnie Foster) 34 3 1 , 274 15 , 288 1 , 390 16 , 680 8 . 02 8. Waterworks Our. #2 (Robert Adams) 25 3 1 , 170 14 , 040 1 , 276 15 , 312 7 . 36 U, 9 . Waterworks Opr. 73 (Curtis Heintz) 22 1; 1 ,118 13 , 416 1, 220 14 , 640 7 . 04 I 10. Waterworks Opr. #3 (Harold Kuehn) 62 3z 1 ,118 13 , 416 1 , 220 14 , 640 7 . 04 11. Draftsman (Bonnie Hall) 24 _ 960 11 , 520 1 , 046 12 , 552 ---- Total: Field Personnel 181, 336 197 , 734 Office Personnel 12 . Bookkeeper (Nancy Larson) 32 3 1, 000 12 , 000 1 ,150 13 , 800 (Includes i pay: $60/m0. 1 11 . Clerk-Typist (Annie Schwartz) 26 5 840 10 , 030 916 10 , 992 ---- 1 .1 . Billing Clerk (Brenda Healy) 21 - ---- ---- 750 9 , 000 ---- Total: Office Personnel 2.2 , 000 33 , 792 TOTAL: $203 , 416 $231, 576 BOND SINKING FUND April 1 , 1978 RESOURCES Estimated Funds , July 1 , 1978 : Cash in bank, April 1 $ 20 Oregon State Investment Pool 121, 200 General Fund transfer (3 mo. ) -0- I 4y, Uncollected taxes (3 mo. ) 5 , 580 Interest Income (3 mo. ) 2 , 800 Sub-total : 12.9 , 600 Less : Bond interest payment, May 1 : - 500 Estimated Balance, July 1 , 1.978 : 129 , 100 Estimated Funds, July 1, 1978 - June 30 , 1979 : Interest Income $ 10 , 300 Prior years ' tax levies 4 , 600 General Fund transfer. ($13 , 000/mo) 156 , 006 Estimated Income, FY1.978-79 : 170, 900 Total Taxes to balance budget: (See below) 160 , 000 TOTAL RESOURCES : $460 , 000 REQUIREMENTS Present bonded indebtedness : t''Y 1978-79 (Principal and Interest) : $332 , 022 EY 1979-80 (Principal and Tnte.r.est) (k;) : 127 , 978 4 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS : $460, 000 HISTORY OF ADVALOREM TAXES Tax Rate Amount Fiscal Year Assessed Valuation % Increase per $1, 000 Received 1966-67 $ 37 , 600, 000 --- 40 $ 15 , 100 1967-68 50,000 , 000 33% 33fi 16 , 400 1968-69 61, 900 , 000 24% 34$ 21 , 000 1969-70 80 ,100 , 000 29% 24$ 18 , 600 1970-71 96 , 700, 000 21% 24$ 21 , 600 1971-72 111, 400, 000 15% 26$' 2.9 , 000 1972-73 135, 854 , 000 22° 26$ 35 , 300 1973-74 157 , 037 , 000 16% 30$ 47 , 100 1974-75 194 , 780, 000 24% 34$;' 66 , 200 1975-76 235, 960, 000 21% 38$' 89 , 700 1976-77 260, 836 , 000 11% 46$ 120 , 000 1977-78 320 , 588 , 000 23% 42$ 134 , 600 1978-79 385, 000, 000 (est. ) 20% (est. ) 42$ 160 , 000 (est) -6a-