Loading...
09/14/1976 - Packet ' 4 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT E11341S. W. COMMERCIAL ST. TIGARD, OREGON 97223 PHONE (503) 639-1554 September 14 , 1976 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER 1. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF LAST MEETING 2. VISITORS 3. RESOLUTION TO PAY VOUCHERS 4. RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE LOWEST ACCEPTABLE BID TO CONSTRUCT 10-MG PRESTRESSED CONCRETE RESERVOIR AT S . W. 125TH AND BULL MOUNTAIN ROAD 5. RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE AND EMPOWER CHAIRMAN AND TREASURER TO BORROW FUNDS UP TO $100 ,000 ON A SHORT-TERM BASIS FOR PURPOSES OF MEETING CURRENT EXPENSES (BOND SINKING FUND) UNTIL TAX REVENUES ARE RECEIVED 6. RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH NOVEMBER 9 , 1976 AS THE DATE TO ISSUE $1. 9 MILLION IN GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 7 . RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PROPOSED CONTRACT TO TRANSFER DISTRICT'S RIGHTS OF 2 , 500 ACRE-FEET OF WATER FROM SCOGGIN DAM TO THE CITY OF HILLS- BORO, UTILITIES COMMISSION 8. RESOLUTION TO OFFER METZGER WATER DISTRICT THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR INVESTMENT IN CONSTRUCTION COSTS TO EXTEND THE WATER MAIN ALONG S . W. NORTH DAKOTA STREET IN EXCHANGE FOR TRANSFERRING 22 METER CONNECTIONS TO THE TIGARD WATER DIS- TRICT 9. OTHER BUSINESS Nywr ADJOURNMENT ADMINISTRATORS REPORT (Continued) 1. Resolution to approve minutes of last meeting. 2 . Visitors. 3. Resolution to pay vouchers . 4. Resolution to approve the lowest acceptable bid to construct 10-MG prestressed concrete reservoir at S . W. 125th and Bull Mountain Road. F&F Dozing Company is progressing satisfactorily and should complete excavating the 60 , 000 cubic yards of earth material for the 10-MG reservoir by the end of September. Construction on the reservoir can commence on October 1st. Plans and specifications were completed last month. Advertisement for bids was published in the Daily Journal of Commerce as follows: aloud by the Administrator of the said District at the Tigard Water District of- flee at the above named time and date. T ' ' Bids received after the time fixed for TIGARD WATER .^ opening will not be considered. DISTRICTBidders shall comply with Chapter 979, ORS, as well as any changes and 10-MG PRESTRI&SBED CONCRETE amendments thereto. Prospective RESERVOIR bidders must be prequalified in acoor- Hids dee at 7:36 p.m.Sept.14 dance with ORS using regular AGC INVITATION TO BID forms.To be eligible to bid on this pro- Written sealed bids will be received ject, prequaliticdtion forms must be by the Board of Commissioners,Tigard received at the District office not later Water District, Washington County, than four(4)days prier to bid opening. Oregon,until 7:39 p.m.,PDT,Tuesday, The decision of the Board of Corn- September 14,1978,for the construction missioners with respect to the of a le million gallon prefessed con- qualifications of the prospective bidder crete reservoir,related piping,rind Sp- is final. purtenagces Oa be located near S.W. The Board of Commissioners,Tigard 195th and Bull Mountain Road. Water District, reserves the right to One set of Drawings,Specifications, 'reject any or all bids, waive infer- aadoForms of Contract Documents may malities, or to accept any bid which r..,, be obtained at the District », appears to serve the best interests of the District , lfg •4`dy�1j4' 4r !!i i,+:- der —1— ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) At this meeting the contract can be awarded. However, "Notice to Proceed" can not be issued until a building per- mit is received from Washington County which includes a design review. Also, the Oregon State Health Division must approve the plans. No problems are anticipated in either case. As a precautionary measure I have retained Charles G. Peterson, registered structural engineer, to review the plans and specifications, and submit his professional opinion on the strength of the structure. This will include adequacy of footings, walls, columns, floor, and roof. Important thickness dimensions are as follows: floor -- 5" ; roof '-- 7-3/4" ; walls -- 15" ; and columns-20" diameter, (104 required) . He will not study the hydraulics of the system which, I believe, is under control. We have the benefit of the ST&R study of 1971 for guidance and advice on desired flows, .... pipe sizes, pressures, etc. The estimated cost for construction of the reservoir is $1 million. This will be, by far, the largest single contract awarded in the history of the Tigard Water District. You should proceed with caution in the awarding of this con- tract. Specifically, you must ensure that the contractors bidding for the job are fully qualified. To assist you in this determination we have required that the bidders be pre- qualified. It is desirous that only reputable, knowledgeable and experienced contractors bid on this job. The construction of a 10-MG reservoir should not be the training grounds for learning to build a water tank. The public has too much at stake on this one. It will be your decision to make whether a contractor is qualified. It will be the first order of business . If you determine, for good and sufficient reasons, that a cer- tain contractor (s) is not qualified you should not accept or open his bid proposal. I will be recommending to you whom I believe to be qualified. Ken Baines has been alerted to the problem and will be prepared to assist you in your deliberations on this matter. -2- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) From the contractors submitted prequalifications so far I would recommend the following: Qualified: Reservoir experience a. Thomas L. Henshaw (10 years) (Eugene) 1. 5-MG City of Eugene 8 . 0-MG City of LaGrande 1. 5-MG City of Sweet Home 0. 25MG City of Amity 1. 5-MG City of Medford 10 .0-MG City of Salem 1. 5-MG City of Lake Oswego 2. 5-MG City of Corvallis 7 . 0-MG Powell Valley Water Dist. w.r. 6. 0-MG City of Gresham b. Richard L. Martin (5 years) (Lake Oswego) 5. 0-MG City of Olympia, Wash. 10 . 0-MG City of Longview, Wash. Not Qualified: a. ARCOMM Construction Co. None since incorporation (Milwaukie, Oregon) in 1974 . (Experience is in construction of sewer treatment plants . ) b. North American Contractors (5 years) (Portland) None since incorporation in 1971. * (Prequalified by Ore. (Experience is in construction State Hwy Dept. and of sewers and treatment plants.) General Services Dept. ) Owner previously was with Teeples and Thatcher as V.P. and General * See Para 279 . 047 below Mgr. In that capacity he built O.R.S. 10-MG reservoir for Walla Walla _3_ at least 8 years ago. *goo ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) Chapter 279 , O.R.S. , contains pertinent information on public contracts . The following quoted paragraphs are considered important: 279 . 037 Disqualification of bidder. (1) A public contracting agency may disqualify any person as a bidder on a public contract if the agency finds : (a) The person does not have sufficient financial ability to perform the contract. If a bond is required to insure performance of a contract, evidence that the person can acquire a surety bond in the amount and type required shall be sufficient to establish financial ability. (b) The person does not have equipment available to perform the contract. (c) The person does not have key personnel of suf- ficient experience to perform the contract; or (d) The person has repeatedly breached contractural obligations to public and private contracting agencies . (2) The public contracting agency may make such investiga- tion as is necessary to determine whether a person is quali- fied. If a bidder or prospective bidder fails to supply promptly information as requested by the public contracting agency pursuant to such investigation, such failure is grounds for disqualification. 279. 039 Prequalification of bidders where contract let by agency; notification. (1) Any public contracting agency may adopt a rule requiring mandatory prequalification for all persons desiring to bid for public improvements that are to be let by the agency. The rule shall include the time for submitting prequalification statements and a general description of the type and nature of the contracts that may be let. The prequalification statement shall be in writing on a standard form prescribed by the board. No such rule shall be effective until a copy thereof has been received by the board. -4- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) (2) The public contracting agency shall within 30 days of the receipt of the prequalification statement submitted pur- suant to subsection (1) of this section, notify the prospec- tive bidder if he is qualified or not, the nature and type of contracts that he is qualified to bid on and the time period for which the prequalification is valid. If the public contracting agency disqualifies the prospective bidder as to any contracts covered by the rule, the notice shall specify which subsections of ORS 279 .037 the prospective bidder failed to comply with. (3) A person prequalified to bid under this section is conclusively deemed qualified under ORS 279. 037. (4) If a public contracting agency subsequently discovers that a person heretofore prequalified under subsections (1) and (2) of this section is no longer qualified under ORS 279 . 037, the agency may revoke the prequalification upon Alow reasonable notice to the prospective bidder; provided,how- ever, that such revocation shall be invalid as to any con- tract for which an advertisement for bids has already been made under ORS 279. 025. 279 . 047 Effect of prequalification by Highway Division or Department of General Services. If a person has been prequalified pursuant to ORS 279 . 039 by the Highway Division of the Department of Transporta- tion to perform contracts for the construction, maintenance, or improvement of highways or roads, or by the Department of General Services to perform contracts for the construction of other public improvements, he may submit proof of such qualification in lieu of a prequalification statement as required by subsection (1) of ORS 279 .039 or as a request for prequalification under subsection (1) of ORS 279 ,041. If a person submits proof of such prequalification, then he is rebuttedly presumed qualified under ORS 279 . 037 . Finally, if it is determined that a sub-par contractor is legally prequalified to perform the work and is the low bidder, Paragraph 279 . 035 may apply, as follows; -5- `wwr ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) 279. 037 Rejection of bids. The public contracting agency may reject any bid not in compliance with all prescribed public bidding procedures and requirements, and may reject all bids if in the judgment of the agency it is in the public interest to do so. In any case where competitive bids are required and all bids are rejected, and the proposed contract is not abandoned, new bids may be called for as in the first instance. It should be noted that neither John Miller nor I are experts on reservoir construction. However, we do intend to inspect the work on a part-time basis without the expense and assistance of a full-time inspector. The absolute requirement that we have an experienced contractor to perform the work, for this reason alone,may be sufficient to reject any and all bids because a sub-par contractor was low bidder. ,.... This legal mumble jumble , in the end, will have to be interpreted by Ken Baines as events occur at the meeting. In the meantime, for those I consider unqualified, I am sending letters requesting information on key personnel, equipment on hand, and proof of prequalification from the Department of Transportation and General Services Administra- tion. -6- ADMINISTRATOR`S REPORT (Continued) 5. Resolution to authorize and empower the Chairman and Treasurer to borrow funds up to $100 ,000 on a short-term basis for purposes of meeting current expenses (Bond Sinking Fund) until tax revenues are received. Bond issues of previous years will become due on October 1st and November 1st. (Principle and 2 interest) . However, tax revenues will not be received until early December. Therefore, the need arises for cash on hand to meet current payments . By State law, the maximum interest percentage that can be charged a municipal corporation for this type of loan is 5% . As tax revenues are received, any indebtedness will be liquidated. Because tax revenues are not received until December I have recommended, in the past, that the semi-annual payment dates for bonds be January 1st and July 1st. This should also be the case with the new $1. 9 million bond issue. 6. Resolution to establish November 9 , 1976 as the date to issue $1. 9 million in General Obligation Bonds . It appears that only two dates should be considered for the bond issue if you desire that it be at a regular meeting date. Those dates are October 12th and November 9th. Special meetings could be called if other dates are desired. If you authorized, at this meeting, the immediate issuance of the bonds, the earliest date for selling the bonds would be in early October. Certain legal and administrative procedures must be complied with prior to issuing any bonds. I *ow -7- Now ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) The advantages of a date in November versus in October are as follows: a. Historical data will be the latest available, as of June 30, 1976, in the preparation of the pros- pectus. b. Moody' s rating can be acquired with latest info. c. Funds will not be needed in bond construction until mid-November. If one has a crystal ball or valid information to predict what the interest rates will be on the two designated dates it would certainly be advisable to select the best date. A small interest percentage advantage in a $1. 9 million bond issue would mean a r..•° considerable savings to the district. Some figures on interest rates for other bond issues are shown as follows : Tigard Water District Oct, 1971 $500,000 4 .9200% Tigard Water District Oct, 1972 $480,000 4 .7836% Veterans ' Affairs (Salem) Apr, 1976 $125 million 5. 2355% Veterans ' Affairs (Salem) Aug, 1976 $150 million 5. 0587% Tigard Water District (est. by bond brokers) Aug, 1976 $1,900 ,000 5.35% It appears that the best we can hope for is some- where between 5. 0% and 5. 25% . yr -8- Nor ADMINISTRATOR' S REPORT (Continued) 7. Resolution to approve proposed contract to transfer district' s rights of 2, 500 acre-feet of water from Scoggin Dam to the City of Hillsboro, Utilities Commission. Ken Baines has prepared a proposed agreement between the City of Hillsboro, Utilities Commission, and the Tigard Water District. (See enclosed document) . It is believed that any subsequent changes in the document will be insignificant and you can approve the contract as presented. 8. Resolution to offer Metzger Water District the equivalent of their investment in construction costs to extend the water main along S. W. North Dakota Street in exchange for transferring 22 meter connections to the Tigard Water District. Recent events have occurred which indicate that it may be advantageous to both Metzger and Tigard Water Districts to resolve the problem along S . W. North Dakota Street at an early date. Waker & Associates, Engineers, have advised that they are planning a development of 33 single family dwellings to be located just west of the Metzger Sewerage Treatment Plant. The area has been annexed to the Tigard Water District, but the closest, most realistic water ser- vice would be from Metzger Water District' s 8" main. This main also serves an existing 6" main along North Dakota Street where 22 out-of-district customers are served by Metzger. This area is an island within the TWD. To fully understand the situation I will attempt to retrace some of the history of water service to this area. -9- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) In 1967 the Administrator of Metzger Water District, Mr. Ed Ferrel, estimated the cost to install a 6" main 2 , 500 feet along S. W. North Dakota Street to be about $8, 500. According to the December 14 , 1967 minutes, the cost estimate was submitted to interested parties (proper- ty owners) and the $8, 500 was collected without referral to the Board of Commissioners . The fact that the Board of Commissioners was unaware of this main extension is important because it was an out-of-district area which under conditions that existed at that time could never be annexed to Metzger Water District. The former Progress Water District and TWD were intervening districts and the area could never be contiguous , thus ineligible, for an- nexation. Mr. Ferrel lives on North Dakota Street and it was my understanding that he wanted to be served Bull Run water via Metzger Water District. 'w Final cost of the project came to $9 ,343 . 65, but the 23 participants objected to the increased amount because it was their belief that the $8, 500 was a firm bid by Mr. Ferrel. (Minutes of April 29 , 1968) . I believe the record shows that Metzger Water Dis- trict paid the contested amount of $843 . 65 of which $196. 56 was reimbursed to them on June 6, 1970 by Mr. Alfred S. Gordon as his pro-rata share of the main ex- tension. Metzger Water District still has $647 , 09 due for their investment in the main. In December 1970 I visited Metzger Water District to discuss a common boundary line to the north. I was particularly interested in not duplicating the mistake of having a street as a boundary line, such as Greenburg Road. For both water districts to own and install a main along the same street is ridiculous and a waste of the tax payers money. One main would have been sufficient to serve both sides of the street. As Tom Keeler, former Administrator, and I were discussing the matter, Mr, John Haggland, Chairman of the Board of Commissioners, Metzger Water District, arrived. He stated that Metzger wanted to rid itself -10- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) of those out-of-district customers on S . W. North Dakota Street because there was no way the area could be annexed and the water service to the area would al- ways be unsatisfactory. As a result of this meeting, on December 11, 1970, I sent a letter to Mr. Julian G. Torland (copy to Board of Commissioners, Metzger Water District) and all other Metzger' s customers residing on North Dakota Street ad- vising them of the situation. In response to my letter a meeting was held by a group of the residents. Clarence Nicoli attended the meeting. A consensus of the group revealed that they preferred to remain on the softer Bull Run water and did not care to experience water restrictions every summer. No further action was taken on the matter. In March 1973, Commonwealth, Inc. , desired water service for a subdivision development of 110 acres to the northwest of North Dakota Street. It had always been my understanding that Progress Water District would serve that area. This concept was supported by Elden Carter who was the consulting engineer for Progress, Metzger, and Tigard Water Districts . However, Mr. Charles Kemper, Engineer, with CRAG, after a detailed study, recommended to the Boundary Review Commission that the area could best be served by Tigard and that the railroad tracks to the east would be a logical boundary between the water districts. In view of this recommendation, the Boundary Review Commission approved annexation of the Commonwealth property to Tigard Water District. In August 1975 a group of property owners to the north and east of North Dakota Street, including the Robinson family, desired annexation to TWD. Annexation of this parcel meant that the North Dakota Street area would become an island within the boundaries of the TWD. At the Boundary Review Commission hearing I was surprised to discover that the Board of Commissioners, Metzger Water District, opposed the annexation to TWD. Apparently, the new commissioners were unaware and had not been informed of the history and past decisions on this area. On September 17 , 1975, the area was officially annexed to the TWD. -11- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) A quick look at a map would show that TWD can best serve the North Dakota Street area because the water system can be circulated from both ends, Tiedeman and 115th Avenue. The main is presently "dead-ended" . Our system is much improved and different now than in 1970 and the residents should not object to a change. We have not had a water shortage or restrictions in 5 years. The latest figures reveal that 72% of the water consumed in TWD is imported soft Clackamas River or Bull Run. Last month, Bull Run water accounted for 14% of the total amount consumed. These percentages will con- tinue to increase in the future. It should be noted that North Dakota Street is located immediately off the Bull Run conduit from Bradley Corner. Politically, the Board of Commissioners , MWD, has no obligation to those residents because the area is not an integral part of the Metzger Water District. This is a different situation than the Rolling Hills area because that area was annexed to Metzger and they had a legal obligation to serve those customers. Tigard Water District would benefit from the use of the 6" main on North Dakota Street by better flows and service to the Summercrest and Commonwealth developments. As just compensation to Metzger Water District I would recommend not only their initial investment of $647 . 09 , but also, their anticipated profits for the next year from the 22 meter connections or about $1, 400 . Total recommended settlement would be $2,000 . The alternative is for you to approve that Metzger serve the new development of 33 homes, thereby proliferat- ing their number of out-of-district customers. 9 . Other business. -12- yaw ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) 10 . Unmetered water. Pumped Purchased Total Sold Loss Month & Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Loss Year x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 Aug 1976 3, 167 * 6, 755 (LO) 11, 591 11, 201 390 3.4% 1, 669 (Port) Cumulative Total FY 1976-7 : (2 mo. ) 6, 303 **16, 380 22 , 683 20 ,783 1, 900 8 .4% * 72. 7% of water consumed during August 1976 was purchased from either Lake Oswego or Portland. ** 72. 2% of water consumed during FY 1976-77 (2 months) was purchased from either Lake Oswego or Portland. Summary of past years: Percentage of water purchased from either Lake Oswego or Portland: FY 1973-4 : 52% FY 1974-5: 60% FY 1975-6 : 61% Water losses: FY 1972-3 : 18 ,3% FY 1973-4 : 11, 1% FY 1974-5: 16. 2% FY 1975-6 ; 7 . 4% `+r -13- New ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) 11. Water pumped from wells, Calendar Year 1976 . Month Actual *Actual Allocation/Month 1976 Cubic Feet Acre-Feet Acre-Feet Jan 3,131, 250 71. 9 88 Feb 2, 948, 530 67 . 7 88 Mar 3, 212, 670 73. 7 88 Apr 3, 119 , 030 71. 6 88 May 3, 114, 860 71. 5 88 Jun 3, 013, 940 69 . 2 88 Jul 3, 136, 340 72 . 0 88 Aug 3 , 166, 930 72 . 7 88 k Total: 24, 843, 550 570. 3 704 (8 months) 12-month projection: 855. 0 1, 056 140, * 1-acre-foot = 43 , 560 cubic feet Actually pumped in prior years : CY 1970 : 1, 616 acre-feet CY 1971: 1, 418 " CY 1972 : 1, 501 " CY 1973: 1,269 " CY 1974 : 924 CY 1975 : 930 " 12. Percentage of Bull Run water purchased for computing amount due for Systems Development Charge. Month & Well Lake Oswego Portland Total % Year Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Cu. Ft. Bull Run Oct 1975 3 ,165, 790 4,140 , 600 100 7 ,306, 490 0 ,00136% Nov 1975 3, 081,440 2, 949 , 600 300 6, 031,340 0 . 00497% Dec 1975 2,820,770 4,365, 700 200 7 , 186, 670 0 . 00278% Jan 1976 3, 131, 250 3 , 581, 000 100 6 ,712,350 0 , 00148% Feb 1976 2, 948 , 530 3 , 258, 600 300 6,207 , 430 0. 00483% Mar 1976 3, 212, 670 3, 455, 800 100 6, 668 , 570 0. 00150% Apr 1976 3 ,119, 030 3, 534, 900 100 6, 654 , 030 0 . 00150% May 1976 3, 114, 860 4, 523 , 500 2 , 700 7, 641, 060 0 . 03533% Jun 1976 3 , 013,940 6,776,100 100 9,790,140 0 , 00102% *410, Jul 1976 3 , 136,340 7,738 ,300 217 , 800 11,092 ,440 1.96350% Aug 1976 3 ,166, 930 6, 754, 600 1, 669 , 400 11, 590 ,930 14 .40264% Total: 33,911, 550 51, 078 ,700 1, 891, 200 86, 881, 450 2 ,17676% (11 Mo. ) or 2+% -14- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (CONTINUED) 13 . Work accomplished during August 1976 . a. TWD installed 535 feet of 12" D.I . , 2, 245 feet of 8" D. I. , and 1, 225 feet of 6" D. I . pipe + 5 fire hy- drants for SUMMERFIELD, Platt 7, Phase IV, for Tualatin Development Company, Inc. (92 single family dwellings) . (Developer' s) . Copper services (92) were also installed. b. TWD installed 1, 820 feet of 6" PVC from Summer- field Drive and 98th Avenue (lake @ #5 hole) to Durham Road and Alderbrook Drive for Summerfield Civic Associa- tion. An 8" PVC line will be extended to the USA treatment plant after the sanitary sewer main is installed. This water will be 3rd stage tertiary water for sprinkling the golf course and will not be connected in any way with our water mains. (Developer's) `" w c. F&F Dozing Company has excavated about half of the required earth material (30, 000 cubic yards) in prep- aration for the 10-MG reservoir to be located at S . W. 125th and Bull Mountain Road. d. Bernhardt Landscaping Company installed lawn sprinkler system and seeded grounds surrounding new Hi Tor reservoir site. e. TWD installed 27 meters (4795 - 4769) . District also serves 41 meters in Metzger Water District. Total : 4836. 14 . Work to be accomplished during remainder of fiscal year 1976-77. September 1976 : a. TWD install 980 feet of 8" D.I. , 2 ,700 feet of 6" D. I . , 250 feet of 4" D. I . + 6 fire hydrants for ENGLE- WOOD III for Commonwealth, Inc. (76 single family homes) (Developer' s) . Copper services will also be installed. -15- war ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) b. Oleson and Oleson Construction Company install 500 feet of 6" D.S. pipe + 1 fire hydrant near S. W. 133rd Avenue, north of Beef Bend Road, to serve three lots owned by Mr. Doug Reif. (Developer' s) . c. TWD install fire hydrant at terminus of S . W. 133rd Avenue, north of Beef Bend Road. d. TWD install 2, 860 feet of 8" PVC from Durham Road and Alderbrook Drive to USA treatment plant to complete system for non-potable water to Summerfield Golf Course for Summerfield Civic Association. (Developer' s) e. F&F Dozing Company complete excavating for 10-MG reservoir to be located at S. W. 125th and Bull Mountain Road. October 1976: a. Cornell Construction Company install 1, 000 feet of 8" D. I. and 300 feet of 6" D.I. pipe + 2 fire hydrants along S. W. 113th Place, south of Tigard Street, for a development called "MUTTLEY ADDITION" consisting of 26 single family dwellings for Mr. Herbert Morrisette. (Developer' s) b. Private contractor install 710 feet of 6" D.I . pipe + 3 fire hydrants along S. W. King Arthur Court, near Beef Bend Road, for a multiple unit development of 62 units (7 buildings) called "KING CITY TERRACE #2" for Tualatin Development Company. (Developer's) c. TWD install 200 feet of 6" D.I . to complete cir- culation loop at terminus of S. W. Pathfinder Way to Fonner Street for PATHFINDER II (Sam Gotter) for construction of 5 single family dwellings. (Developer' s) d. TWD install fire hydrant for Gerber Blades, near S. W. 72nd Avenue, for Mr. Gerber. (Developer' s) war -16- Now ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) e. TWD install 1,080 feet of 12" D.I . and 400 feet of 6" D.I. pipe + 2 fire hydrants along S . W. Fern Street, west of 135th Avenue, to replace 4" O.D. steel pipe and parallel for pressure system. f. Private contractor commence construction of 10-MG reservoir to be completed in one year. November 1976: a. TWD install anti-surge and pressure-reducing valve with manifold in concrete vault at 132nd Street pump station. b. Private contractor install submersible deep well pump at #1 reservoir site. c. TWD install 1400 feet of 12" D. I . and 1300 feet of 6" D. I. pipe + 3 fire hydrants along S. W. 103rd Avenue, Inez to MacDonald Street, to replace 6" O.D. steel pipe and parallel for pressure system. d. TWD install 400 feet of 12" D. I . pipe + 1 fire hydrant along S. W. 72nd Avenue to Kable Street. December 1976: a. TWD install fire hydrants as follows : (1) 125th and Karen Street. (2) 115th and Fonner Street. (3) Tigard and Summercrest Street. (4) Easement (Penrose) and Mountain View Lane. (5) 72nd and Landmark Lane. (Georgia-Pacific) -17- w.. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT (Continued) January 1977 : a. Maintain equipment and materiel. February 1977: a. TWD install 600 feet of 12" D.I . and 600 feet of 8" D. I. pipe along easement road from #2 reservoir to Gaarde Street to replace 6" O.D steel pipe and parallel for pressure system. March 1977: a. TWD install 500 feet of 12" D. I . pipe + 1 fire hydrant along S. W. 135th Avenue, Fern Street to #3 reser- voir, to provide adequate pressure south of Fern Street. April and May 1977 : a. TWD install 2260 feet of 12" D.I . + 4 fire hydrants from S. W. 132nd and Walnut (pump station) to 135th and Fern Street to provide adequate pressure and eliminate Fern Street pump station. June 1977 : a. Inventory and prepare for long, hot summer. -18- .SENT O r m; , . k,'''c: 0 United States Department of the Interior ' " i`j'` BUREAU OF RECLAMATION "f'= 3v;d / PA(.IFI(. \1)RTII\1EST RI GIO\ '! ;Ti_4iA° FEDERAL. BUIL DING y U.S. COURTHOUSE BO\ 043-550 REST FORT STREET BOISE, IDAHO 83724 1\ Rf 1'I T RI I I R 1„ 360 Chairman 9 lea Tigard Water District 8841 Commercial Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 s District Chairman: Scoggins Dam and related facilities are substantially complete, and the formal announcement of water availability for 1976 was ' stated in our letter of August 29, 1975. Accordingly, interest f during construction has been computed through December 31 , 1975. Our letter of August 29, 1975, also pointed out that because of cost increases since July, 1969, the district's obligation would probably reach the maximum amount of $715,800.00, plus 20 per- cent for cost increases, plus interest during construction. At this time, the costs have reached the maximum construction obli- gation of $858,960.00 ($715,800.00 plus $143,160.00 for cost in- iimpr creases). This amount plus interest during construction of G ,. $89,824.55 now becomes the district's repayment obligation total- ing $948,784.55. If the district does not desire to divert water prior to 1986, p ., the first construction installment of $40,450.48 will be due on December 31 , 1987, and a like amount will be due December 31 g of each succeeding year for 49 years. Sincerely yours, �►J ilu.. -3 _ding Regional Director I__ Nik 'F-, U 7'%6-1(iC, ,W LAW OFFICES OF 4414010' WHEELOCK,NIEHAUS, BAINES,MURPHY 8 OGILVY CE WHEELOCK SUITE 700 BENZ FRANKLIN PLAZA AREA CODE 503 RUSSELL R.NIEHAUS ONE SOUTHWEST COLUMBIA TELEPHONE 224-5930 KENNETH W BAINES PORTLAND,OREGON 97258 EDWARD MURPHY.JR August 12 , 1976 WILLIAM C OGILVY GORDON L.OSAKA R. Stivers Acting Regional Director 1-3areot of Reclamation 20.•:!ific florth,.::,!tst Building • . Bo'i 013-550 littst Port Street floirlfa . Idoho 83724 • . , DP : Tualetin Federal Reclamation Project, Oregon • Tivard Water District Contract • Dear Mr. Stivors : ) We are the attorneys for the Tigard Water District and enoloorl in a proposed Agreement between tho City of Hilltyboro, Utc1, Commission, and our client involving t? sale end purchalo the wate7: which is the subject E.:atter of tts crotioned c ntc We requcst that thn Secretary of the Interlsr cr his duly auth- °sized reprocontative approve in writing this assignment. Plcac'a mail nisch written approval, to M3. • M . Eldon Mills, Hiliboro's City Manager, advises in teat the terr3 of this arIrccrannt are acceptable. Thank you. tieVe9r truly yours, •6-0,c LID • 14„, K4nneth W. Baines KWBst 0 EncYocnres CC: MT. Eldon Mills w/enelonuros /Mr. rebert E. Eanteo w/naclesuroo Now P.S. t) Bob Santee: Also enclosed is a copy of the Amended Charter of the City of Hillsboro. Chapter XXIV beginning on page 49 sets forth the powers of the Utilities Commission. . , . . 1%,.. Arnr77.= TUALATIN FEDEPU Rrmrpmon PROJECT THIS ACTImmENT , mai and entered into am of the 1st day ( !A.iiTwA- - 1(7 'r,f,twn,,-%a thrT.:!.(.3a,-,fd Water Diatrict, a public . corl,crit.t:;,01:. cli.ly :,1.9ani%nd and eNAnting under tho lalis c too r < .)3-con. ftrc,ir.7After rcferr&I to no "D.:1Lntrict" , nni thv ( :_tiy o(' 111.11W.K!,.vo , utill(tAvn Ce=mAnnAcn, t r... nicinal co:Tor- ntion oj thn 41tnte of Onncel, ho7:0Annfea' reford tl co vCAt7" , WXTV;7!OOSTS: , wvEREAS , District han crrentel t contract t/Ath thn ITn,, r,1 .rtnnC13 of Ao.eicii for thr puTchnre of 2,f3c1 acre fc... t p:N: yen*: c.., , r7.-71,- cipnl 6nd WtAntrinI VAN717 t1 f' 1 Ni pj,f)yi 1701.3cis*-or: 1: ':, /12/71, ..osktrnct No, 34 -06-400-?7,.W!, n c. py (-)12 tg,iCA An ctfc'- ''' -.' 1 hf-r.o. o, mnrize71 L:thibit As o!fl by thAn rePor. Acc'i.qc. 1 ;- - , i in; pad WHEREAS, City is denArcno of? pir:ehnoincl thn entire thtn rater end that the prrolnce rRn for c:n.,.77.1 uater to th..,,Lc7 y7%.1). bo n11 mots horetofore pnid 1°17 tto Plotr:Ac t7.) thn Un'Itcd r -,.,:; '4410., oz America, and tho e:tact cc C1 of enid vate:' to no Dlotr!c'a t.- 27-: , the for of cuch centract; end . unnnms, the partien to thAn ngroc=..nt cr7n enw=red tn f-r77,Y7 into thin contract for the enle end p=chacio of th3 water; c7c1 vuulms, en agreement fon tho c=7,:lric=o ol thn %Intel- rAnto of the District to City end pnymnnt Iv 0.tT.? to tIn Diotrict c...! m amount suCfAcient to cover: ttn cc n of tino VAntniot. to tto Untted Staten c America for pnr.-caco of tNo t:nOT .1.0 ncceoco.777 for the protectAm of: tho pz,t27io tz.•i-:31.,th/ co.fc'.w rnd cencral c3ARc7.70 of tho partAeo Inroto end 1.7:on p=tSon, bong fony &Wined in t!7:o promAces : tho pion agz:oo eo follc:m: (1) WU-AT:Act ecen hereby bath, con cnd cnnvoy unto City, it nuccencoao ani tooigno, all rAuht, titlo nnd Amterent An tto water w.M.ch Diotrict An entAt?,cd to receive pur.ounnt to tto con- tract attached hereto an Erhiblt A. (2) CAty, At° succoonerc nnl nonigno honthy ngrce to annumn and pay all o!)ligationn of PAotrAct to tho UnAtzl Ston of LT:InTAca incurred by Dict7Act under On term cR thln ctxact nOT pawl:ent ?or the water. (3) DActrAct ani City further ag-en that at eny time during '41imw the term of tho cgrec=ont bot=en Dintrxt cnd tho United Staten of Arnrica, DAotrict moy at any tiro nfL:er nreo (3) warn written notice to City, regaln all .0-Tat, title eni Llterc0,1: and con- ccnitent obligaticnn in tho vnter. Page 1 - A.GREEIMPIT • . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly enecuted in triplicate pursuant Co r-colutlens heretofore duly aqd legally adopted by each of the part-es signatory herctee TIGARD WATER DISTRICT CITY 0? HILLSBORO Utilities Cenienion 13y:fly Dv: cterp %ow fty Page 2 - dAGREEMENT . . LAW OFFICES OF WHEELOCK,NIEHAUS, BAINES,MURPHY 8 OGILVY virr, C.E.WHEELOCK SUITE 700 BENJ. FRANKLIN PLAZA AREA CODE 503 RUSSELL R NIEHAUS ONE SOUTHWEST COLUMBIA TELEPHONE 224-5930 KENNETH W BAINES PORTLAND,OREGON 97258 EDWARD MURPHY,JR WILLIAM C.OGIIVY August 17 , 1976 GORDON L.OSAKA ), n ,rkrtorn,,v t aw Street or"on 97034 Po : T) ,I.rd Hater Pintrict v. C I t " o 4,.the Oswego )oar Jim: Enclosed is my final form of Findings , Conclusions and Judg- rInnt , There have been some slight typograDhical chan(jes from „ Nor thn prior draft, but nothing of any substanc3 1ms berm changed or acded. Please look this over and let re hoar from von if you have onv o,floe,ions. If I non ' hear from you within the nemt five days , I will deliver tile original of this judgment to Juelge Dale and ask that hi, siqn it. f Very truly yours, Edward Murphy, Jr. EMJr/st Enclosures CC: Tigard Water District 14/enclosures Nror 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE CF OREGON 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 3 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT 4 Plaintiff, ) No. 416 942 5 vs . ) FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS 6 CITY 32 LAKE OSL^;EGO, ) AND JUDGMENT 7 Defendant. ) 3 This case was tried to the Court on July 20 , 21 , and 22 , 9 1976 , I,I. 1 Orr. talar Honorable William I).alr . 10 Plaintiff was represented by Wheelock , Niehaw s , LL ines , 11 Murphy and Ogilvy, by Edward Murphy, Jr. , and Defendant was 12 represented by James Cox. 13 The Court, having fully considered the testimony, evidence, 14 and argument presented by both parties , hereby finds as follows : 15 GENERAL FINDINGS OF FACT 16 1. Under the terms of the contract between the parties 17 the water rates charged to the Plaintiff may be increased only • 1C when and if Defendant incurred an increased cost to produce and lg distribute surplus water to Plaintiff. • ?0 2 . The costs of production and distribution of surplus 21 water since the inception date of this contract in October of J22 1972 , have not increased and, in fact, the evidence shows that 'r L 623 costs for Defendant to produce and distribute water to Plaintiff • nit have decreased. 25 * k .A * 26 k k * ? Pae 1 - FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS & JUDGMENT err 1 3. Any method of financing the future expansion and/or 2 improvement of Lake Oswego' s water treatment system is not such 3 a cost as was contemplated by the parties to be included in the 4 contractual language, "increased cost of production and dist::i- 5 bution of surplus water. " The quoted language contemplates an 6 actual indebtedness incurred which is directly attributable to 7 producing and distributing water to the Tigard Water District. 3 4 . Defendant has sufficient surplus water to meet the 9 requirements of Plaintiff and the Defendant' s own users because 10 Del endant can always curtail or int.erupt. the :supply or surplus 11 water to Plaintiff any time Defendant has insufficient ,fatcr to 12 supply both Defendant' s need and to also supply Plaintiff' s 13 needs . 14 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 15 1. Defendant' s rate increase from $ .14 to $ .25 was not 16 proper and, therefore , is not valid. 17 2Defendant' s attempt to terminate Plaintiff ' s con- O 13 tractual right to receive surplus water is not valid and effective 19 because said notice of termination was not made in good faith. 20 JUDGMENT 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: • 22 1. Defendant' s rate increase is ineffective because it a • .u0 " 23 violates the terms o the agreement between the parties ; and 24 2 . Any future rate increase must be based solely on 25 Defendant' s increased cost for the production and distribution ''err 26 of surplus water to Plaintiff; and age 2 - FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & JUDGMENT 1 3. Plaintiff shall have judgment against Defendant for 2 its costs and disbursements incurred herein taxed at $ 3 DATED this day of August, 1976 . • 4 5 Circuit Court Judge 5 0 10 :1 12 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL parr 1J � . 1fi 14 of ��c�_A eys fox P1ai iZ if 15 15 17 0 19 IL 4 N 2V/fin m,h UI'-`J V 92 ti: 23 ti 24 25 26 Page 3 - FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS & JUDGMENT • • n rirr noTEI Tin nip -i *fame t H ft. ti„ in U a I C). 0. C ;: 2. 0 T!'ALAT±ri, 0^EGCN C7C57. © P' ONE 63i-6.^61 o Gill 5: LI it SMUf?ff, CHEF /August 16, 1976 TO: Lake Grove Wa' er District Metzger Water District i;ivergrave Water District Sherwood Water Deportment . Tigard Wa,:er District ira1atin Water Department Wilsonville Water Department FROM: Chief Russell Washburn Enclosed is a copy of a letter received today from the Insurance Services Office of Oregon. The fire district's last reiraring t.'as in 1973 ald we Teel that the fire protection has increased in o,ir d;str..i c:t to the point that we can qualify for a lel.: ' insurance grading You W11 note that they have a tentative date of r:ovemher •D^nemher for cur .1-quested regrading. This letter is being sett to you to let you k iow that they will he reelewing your water distr ct 's im'iroveme s that have been made since the previous grading. We would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone for their caoperat cin in the increased fire protection endeavors. Yours truly, Russel 1 11. Washburn ---- Chief. RHW:dm • ..• • N r4 n 1 NI CIJRANC --- E3 11;7,:nn,C ET!.Fi 0 F. mcn OF OREGON 4-,. iry, ) .:- 7.21 S.W OAK STR I:ET. POPT1 AND. OREGON 97205 , rEl LPHONE (no3) :26 2651 ________ H. Ti. MAROLJELNG, PAINAGCR r-- r,-;, I ‘, 1 .., August 13.. 1976 i)i,:, • Mr. Buss Washburn, Fire Chief TUAIATIN RURAL FIRE PRO97CTION DISTRICT Post Offic 1-ix 26 TunlatTh OR 97052 Di,-..nr ft1:1s7 TU,, il,-.1r-ovIni you furninhed no thin ''eek bon hoer+ relet,700. l'fIT rolion chn-lpeo tf41(-. ow- JW73 grodirT, It in quite app/Trent 1,117 nl'hiyIntial C71r,P:3 h 17(:, tinn pluce ln f5re ouppresnlon ani flre pyrventiJ,n 7111 eoFtpn :Ivo;x ulth cur la,-;': grad:log, We are setting up a tentative schedule period for Movember-IMIcerher, When a definite claNI can be scheduled, we will Jet you 'how well :h. advInce. We '41110w vnuld appreciate it if you can inform the various writer departments on they will also be aware of this. The growth of inOmItry and buolnesn is apparent from your reports. It in hoped that water supplien will aloe bo c.:- 1,-,:le_d upon, Tn aorta cases, uaer synem :i i' arrcs to be pore eTp,-Ins'ion that ince aolng cynteol capai-)11-7 , Should there be a greater difference batuecln an-17-1 17any SIT577C170 than befoe, iL may be necessary to catablish rorie proo,:_ton class zontig f0:;7 .11,,C7i113 i.7r1e1 Mid commerc-1 al prop nrtv., An on e7:arple, the Wilsonville system did not grade as yell an the other sq7stems and this t-ire the difference ray require some type o',f zone approach to - e.,-egnize the diU6reuce. Sincerely yours, INSURANCE SERVICES OFFI7,E D. F, Wagner, Supervisor Public Protection Popartment Ocuy New GENERAL FUND BUDGET REPORTI ESTIMATE ESTIMATE + OVER 1975-76 1976-77 1975-76 AUGUST 1976-77 1975-76 AUG.ACCUM. 1976-77 - UNDER ACCOUNT ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ! ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET Beginning Working Capital 64,564 55,500 33,460 40,728 108,915 64,564 55,500 99,061 + 43,561 INCOME: 406 Meter Installations 142,573 188,300 13,161 18,441 13,500 19,046 26,876 25,300 - 1,576 407 Line Extension Rebate 2,089 3,000 2,088 -0- -0- 2,088 -0- -0- ' -0- 408 Miscellaneous Income 20,889 18,000 611 1,500 1,118 ! 1,066 1,500 1,068 - 432 412 Interest Income 178 300 -0- -0- 213 -0- 50 369 + 319 418-419 Water Sales 538,606 630,000 56,911 65,400 64,115 118,749 136,500 120,123 - 16,377 425 Penalties for Non-Pay 375 600 15 50 15 ' 30 100 60 - 40 427 Sale of Equipment 55 600 I -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 430 Developer's - 10& Overhead 13,251 24,000 1 3,364 4,000 4,175 3,364 4,000 4,176 + 176 130-1 Developer's - 8% Engineering 9,611 18,000 j 2,550 3,000 3,340 2,550 3,000 3,340 + 340 430-2 Developer's - Equipment 7,524 9,000 ; 2,768 1,500 2,677 2,768 1,500 2,677 + 1,177 430-3 Developer's - Wage Reimbursement 13,127 15,000 J 5,176 2,500 4,403 5,176 2,500 4,403 + 1,903 TOTAL INCOME & WORKING CAPITAL 812,842 962,300 120,104 137,119 202,471 219,401 231,526 260,577 + 29,051 EXPENDITURES: Personal Services 500,1,2,3,4 Salaries 125,422 152,760 j 9,506 12,730 12,369 19,202 25,460 25,347 - 113 504-1 Overtime 5,455 6,840 473 600 384 1,585 1,200 774 - 426 505 Field Labor 22,770 29,400 3,302 2,500 2,950 6,416 5,000 5,034 + 34 506,1 Office Employees 16,423 19,800 , 1,271 1,650 1,650 2,823 3,300 3,300 J -0- 170,070 208,800 1 14,552 17,480 17,353 30,026 34,960 34,455 j �j - 505 EXPENDITURES: Materials & Services 507 Blue Cross of Oregon 2,603 3,000 129 250 256 259 500 492 ! - 8 507-1 Banker's Life Nebraska - Dental 400 1,000 -0- 80 65 -0- 160 130 ' - 30 508 Retirement 6,328 8,000 (241) (286) (263) ; 9,174 2,286 2,178 - 108 509 Social Security 9,159 9,600 837 900 992 1,733 1,800 1,987 + 187 510 State Accident Insurance Fund 7,010 8,000 -0- -0- -0- ` -0- -0- -0- -0- 511 State Unemployment Compensation 6,501 6,000 -0- -0- -0- " -0- 1,500 1,312 - 188 512 Advertising & Elections 751 600 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 514 Equipment Rentals 359 600 106 50 44 60 100 39 ' - 61 515 General Insurance 13,519 15,000 940 -0- -0- 940 1,250 1,179 - 71 516 Miscellaneous Expenses 1,699 1,500 393 150 131 409 250 136 - 114 517 Dues & Subscriptions 602 600 I -0- -0- 48 35 50 73 + 23 518,1,2 Office Supplies & Expenses 8,587 7,200 ' 330 600 755 1,300 1,200 1,265 + 65 519, 1,2 Professional Fees 18,326 12,000 2,000 3,000 3,074 1 2,638 6,000 5,831 - 169 1 t , GENERAL FUND BUDGET REPORT (Cont.) ' ESTIMATE ESTIMATE + OVER 1975-76 1976-77 1975-76 AUGUST 1976-77 1975-76 AUG.ACCUM. 1976-77 ; - UNDER ACCOUNT ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL _4 BUDGET 520 Meter Maintenance 3,445 4,200 418 -0- -0- 446 600 531 - 69 521,1,2,3 Repairs - Lines, Pumps, etc. 6,361 4,800 282 400 573 ' 806 800 589 - 211 522,1,2,3 Utilities 6,140 6,400 371 600 544 I 736 1,100 1,053 - 47 523 Fire Hydrant Maintenance 1,167 1,200 28 -0- -0- 28 300 327 + 27 524 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 6,789 6,000 167 100 368 728 1,000 1,244 + 244 524-1 Gasoline & Oil 5,426 6,000 500 500 530 972 1,000 1,118 + 118 524-2 Tires & Batteries 1,058 900 46 -0- -0- 46 100 -0- - 100 525,1 Water Costs - Electricity 30,853 34,800 c 3,056 2,900 2,976 5,961 5,800 5,737 - 63 525-2 Water Costs - L.O. , Portland 88,612 168,500 9,066 18,800 14,710 20,592 41,700 26,297 - 15,403 527 Small Tools 1,642 1,200 66 100 67 74 200 67 - 133 529 Rain Gear, Safety Equip, etc. 998 900 20 75 127 31 150 151 + 1 530 Employee Training 329 400 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 228,664 308,400 i 18,514 28,219 24,997 46,968 67,846 51,736 - 16,110 EXPENDITURES: Capital Outlay 548 Fire Hydrants 3,653 3,600 -0- -0- -0- j -0- -0- -0- -0- 549 Equipment 55,336 60,400 2,364 -0- -0- 42,789 10,200 8,784 - 1 ,416 550 Buildings & Additions 27,874 1,000 116 -0- -0- 116 -0- -0- -0- 551 Meter Installations 26,888 46,800 7,576 3,300 2,696 8,481 6,000 3,808 - 2,192 552 Land & Improvements 749 1,800 -0- -0- -0- 10 1,800 3,617 + 1,817 553 Operating Contingencies -0- 1,000 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 554 Line Extensions 19,665 2,800 1,123 -0- -0- 2,665 -0- -0- -0- 555 Pipeline Replacements 110,082 1,000 -0- -0- -0- 12,487 -0- -0- -0- 244,247 118,400 11,179 3,300 2,696 66,548 18,000 16,209 - 1,791 700 Transfer to Bond Sinking Fund 70,800 271,200 1 -0- 22,600 -0- -0- 45,200 752 - 44,448 Net Fund Balance 99,061 55,500 752.859 65,520 157,425 75,859 65,520 157,425 + 91,905 TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES 812,842 962,300 1 120,104 137,119 202,471 219,401 231,526 260,577 + 29,051 Inventory Balance August 31, 1976 (Prior to June 30, 1976 Audit) $ 85,951.41 BOND SINKING FUND AUGUST 103 Cash balance at first of month 1 109 Time deposits at first of month 15,000 INCOME: 400 Transfer-in from General Fund -0- 412 Taxes: Current 723 413 Delinquent 114 414 Trailer House -0- 415A Land Sales -0- 418 Interest Earned from Time deposits -0- 419 Interest Earned from Property Taxes -0- Time deposits deposited -0- 837 EXPENSES: 585 Bond Principal -0- 586 Bond Interest -0- 587 Bank Fees & Postage -0- Time deposits purchased -0- -0- TOTAL CASH BALANCE AT END OF MONTH 838 TOTAL TIME DEPOSITS AT END OF MONTH 15,000 TOTAL CASH AND TIME DEPOSITS AT END OF MONTH $ 15,838 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT AUGUST 31, 1976 WELL RECORDS: ,,,,,,. WELL HOURS STATIC PUMPING COSTS-ELECT. NO. OFF LEVEL LEVEL CUBIC FEET PUMPS, ETC. HOURS 1 976,770 $ 381.61 740 2 1,079,800 573.76 736 3 397,840 261.51 736 4 712,520 421.88 737 All 7 pump stations & Alarm-Telemetry Phones 1,337.71 3,166,930 $ 2,976.47 METER RECRODS: Meters #4,769 through #4,795 = 27 meters sold. 41.1.0 BILLING DETAIL: August $ 64,055.50 Delinquent (521.30) 11,201,100 cubic feet of water billed. 441110, TIGARD WATER DISTRICT August 1, through 31, 1976 SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS GENERAL FUND CHECK# PAYEE AMOUNT ACCOUNT 17650 Tigard Station Paid Men 40.00 201 17651 King City Branch - First National Bank 10.35 201 __ 17652 King City Branch - U. S. National Bank 2.20 201 17653 L. H. Cobb Crushed Rock 1,050.00 201 17654 Mobil Oil Corporation 266.00 201 17655 State of Oregon - Employment Division 1,312.42 201 17656 Bureau of Water Works 753.18 201 17657 Wheelock, Niehaus, Baines, Murphy & Ogilvy 1,680.00 201 17658 Homelite 119.31 201 17659 Southwest Readymix Co. 29.50 201 17660 Power Rents, Inc. 27.00 201 17661 Southwest Office Supply, Inc. 41.26 201 17662 Coast to Coast Stores 2.50 201 17663 Pacific Stationery 53.41 201 17664 Hinds Supply Company 50.81 201 17665 Construction Materials Supply, Inc. 2,429.70 201 17666 Goodyear Service Store 5.00 201 17667 Kilham Stationery & Printing 8.55 201 17668 Meter Box Equipment Company 18,086.38 201 17669 Familian Northwest, Inc. 200.89 201 17670 Utility Vault Co. 1,199.00 201 17671 Case Power & Equipment 13.87 201 17672 Utilities Supply Co. 1,435.97 201 17673 Merchants Riverview Delivery Co. 6.70 201 17674 U. S. Pipe & Foundry Company 55,612.10 201 17675 Tigard Lumber & Building Supply 95.75 201 17676 Watt Welding Supply 8. 17 201 17677 A-Boy West Supply Company 19.04 201 iii. 17678 Water Information Center, Inc. 16.00 516 17679 Daily Journal of Commerce 27.50 517 17680 Secretarial Answering Service 25.00 518 17681 General Rubber & Supply Co. 338.86 521-1 17682 General Telephone Co. 491.82 522, 525-1 17683 Reliance Insurance Co. 50.00 516 17684 Standard Oil Co. of Calif 69.30 150 17685 U. S. Postal Service 300.00 518-1 17686 City of Lake Oswego 10,833.62 201 17687 Miller's Auto Service 427.25 201 17688 All Metro Spray 55.00 521-1 17689 Robert E. Santee 611.16 500 17690 Nancy L. Larson 312.97 506 17691 Janice E. Roderick 217.46 506-1 17692 John P. Miller 541.17 502 17693 Russell A. Thomas 447.46 501, 504-1 17694 William C. Bryant 472.43 504, 504-1 17695 John C. Dixon 462.08 501-1, 504-1 17696 Harold H. Kuehn 242.64 503-2 17697 Gregory M. Stroeder 334.34 503-1 17698 Robert M. Adams 305.06 503-1 17699 Michael G. McDermott 128.16 501-2 17700 Randy J. Volk 377.65 503-1 17701 Mickey L. Wilson 239.81 505 17702 Guy Williams 227.58 505 %kw 17703 Douglas E. Hardt 291.47 505 17704 John J. Naylor 189.03 505 17705 Petty Cash 16.63 518, 518-1 17706 Willamette Fence Co. 3,280.00 125 17707 "Water & Sewage Works" Magazine 20.00 517 17708 Washington County - Plan Check 680.50 125 17709 Robert E. Santee 685.41 500 TIGARD WATER DISTRICT August 1, through 31, 1976 SCHEDULE OF DISBURSEMENTS GENERAL FUND (Cont.) CHECK# PAYEE AMOUNT ACCOUNT 17710 Nancy L. Larson 318.55 506 17711 Janice E. Roderick 285.53 506-1 17712 John P. Miller 546.44 502 Iwo 17713 Russell A. Thomas 376.95 501, 504-1 17714 William C. Bryant 418.46 504-1 17715 John C. Dixon 421.24 501-1 17716 Harold H. Kuehn 221.65 503-2 17717 Gregory M. Stroeder 308.72 503-1 17718 Robert M. Adams 353.03 503-1, 504-1 17719 Michael G. McDermott 312.67 501-2 17720 Randy J. Volk 445.97 503-1, 504-1 17721 Mickey L. Wilson 286. 17 505 17722 Guy Williams 260.41 505 17723 Douglas E. Hardt 262. 16 505 17724 John J. Naylor 359.30 505 17725 Donnie R. Foster 150.88 503 17726 Public Employees Social Security 1,983.44 211, 509 17727 U.S. National Bank - Federal Deposit 2,728.40 212 17728 State of Oregon - Department of Revenue 975.00 213 17729 Blue Cross of Oregon 470.20 215, 507 17730 Washington County Federal Credit Union 638.00 216 17731 Bankers Life Nebraska (Dental!) 125.73 217, 507-1 17732 Bankers Life Nebraska (Life) 40. 10 217 17733 Petty Cash 37.19 516, 518 17734 Portland General Electric 2,848. 15 522-2, 525 17735 Workmen's Compensation Board 15.00 516 17736 Northwest Natural Gas Company 9.68 522-1 17737 Brewed Hot Coffee, Inc. 11.95 529 "40' 17738 Metro Southwest Chamber of Commerce =! 13.00 529 17739 F & F Dozing 18,000.00 125 $140,500.39 BOND SINKING FUND None $ .00 TWD - GENERAL FUND - FNB 161 TWD - General Fund - USNB $ 529.00 107 Tigard Water District 8-76 Regular Meeting August 10, 1976 PRESENT: Clarence F. Nicoli, Chairman Hugh A. Brown, Secretary Don W. Thomas R. Verne Wheelwright Robert E. Santee, Administrator John P. Miller, Foreman Kenneth W. Baines, Attorney VISITORS: None The meeting was called to order at 7:33 p.m. by Chairman Nicoli. Motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the last meeting, as written. Motion carried unanimously. Motion was made and seconded to pay the vouchers. Motion carried unanimously. Administrator discussed progress on excavation for the 10-MG reservoir and recent pipe line installations, including the fact that there would soon be a looped system to Tigard High School. Plans for the new reservoir will be completed by the end of August. Bid opening is scheduled for the next regular meeting, September 14th. The most desirable date for selling G.O. bonds totaling $1.9 million was discussed. The Administrator expressed the opinion to proceed on the proposed schedule with the date of bids to be received and opened on November 9th, the regular meeting date. This will provide sufficient time to complete the audit, to have the bonds rated by Moody's, and, hopefully, the bond market will be at its best for the seller. Attorney advised to observe for signs when the bonds would be most marketable, particularly an earlier date. Motion was made and seconded to adjourn at 8:06 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.