MMD2019-00032 NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION
MINOR MODIFICATION MMD2019-00032
WOOD VACANCY
TIGARD
120 DAYS = April 10th, 2020
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: Wood Vacancy
CASE NO.: Minor Modification(MMD) MMD2019-00032
PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to remove 674.5 square feet of lawn for a new
pedestrian walkway and bench seating area at 7374 SW Durham Road. There is a
net loss of two (2) parking spaces on site; one parking space is being converted
into a pedestrian walkway and landscaping strip while a second parking space is
being converted into an ADA accessible loading aisle. Two (2) existing parking
spaces are being designated as ADA parking spaces. The existing stairs and
pedestrian walkway in front of the structure are being removed and replaced with
an exterior stairwell.The tenant space primary entrance will be recessed from the
street-facing wall by one (1) foot. 37 trees are being removed and will be replaced
with 27 trees. No changes to the building footprint or use of the space are
proposed.
APPLICANT: Pacific Realty Associates,L.P.
Attn: Robert Bumcrot
15350 SW Sequoia Parkway,Suite 300
Portland, OR 97224
OWNER Pacific Realty Associates
Attn: N Piven
15350 SW Sequoia Parkway,Suite 300
Portland, OR 97224
LOCATION: 7374 SW Durham Road;WCTM 2S113AB,Tax Lot 1400
ZONING
DESIGNATION: I-P: Industrial Park zone. The I-P zone provides appropriate locations for
combining light manufacturing, office, and small-scale commercial uses, such as
restaurants,personal services,and fitness centers,in a campus-like setting with no
nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare,odor,or vibration.
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330,18.410, 18.420,and 18.765.060.D
MMD2019-00032 Wood Vacancy 1 of 8
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request,subject to a condition of approval. The findings and conclusions on which
the decision is based are noted in Section IV.
CONDITION OF APPROVAL
THE FOLLOWING CONDITION MUST BE SATISFIED:
Unless noted otherwise,the staff contact shall be Samuel Copelan,Assistant Planner;(503)718-2450
or SamuelC@tigard-or.gov
1. Prior to building permit submittal, the applicant must apply for one tree removal permit for the
removal (and replacement) of all 37 trees.
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Information:
The subject property is located at 7374 SW Durham Road, which is located southeast of SW Upper
Boones Ferry Road, southwest of SW Durham Road,and north of SW Findlay Road. This 5.38-acre lot
(WCTM 2S113AB,Tax Lot 1400) contains two office buildings, 200 parking spaces and 2,642.67 square
feet of landscaping.Approximately 1.12 percent of the landscaped area contains hardscape elements.This
site contains steep slopes along the south property line that borders WCTM 2S113AC,Tax Lot 200. No
work is being proposed within the steep slopes. This subject site is zoned Industrial Park (I-P).
Proposal:
The applicant proposes to remove two (2) parking spaces on site; one parking space is being converted
into a pedestrian walkway and landscaping strip while a second parking space is being converted into an
ADA accessible loading aisle. Two (2) existing parking spaces are being designated as ADA parking
spaces.After the proposed modification,there will be a total of 200 parking spaces, four (4) of which will
be ADA accessible.
The applicant is proposing to remove 674.5 square feet of lawn for a new pedestrian walkway and bench
seating area at 7374 SW Durham Road. The proposed walkway counts as hardscape and can be counted
towards the landscaped area according to the L-2 Standard of Table 18.420.1. The landscaped area on
site is currently at 25.59 percent and with the conversion of one parking space into a landscaping strip
and walkway, the net landscaped area increases. The existing stairs and pedestrian walkway in front of
the structure are being removed and replaced with an exterior stairwell. The applicant is proposing to
remove 37 trees and replace with a total of 27 trees. No changes to the building footprint are proposed.
The tenant space primary entrance will be recessed from the street-facing wall by one (1) foot. There are
no design standards for development in the industrial zones, therefore this land use decision will not
address the recessed entrance nor the proposed door. A building permit from 2001 (BUP2001-00423)
indicates that that 7374 and 7376 were previously consolidated into one office use tenant space. The
applicant does not propose a new use for the tenant space and an office use is allowed in the I-P Zone.
MMD2019-00032 Wood Vacancy 2 of 8
SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
Findings for only the applicable code sections are found below:
18.330 Industrial Zone Development Standards:
18.330.040. Development Standards
A. Base zone development standards are provided in Table 18.330.1.
Table 18.330.1
Industrial Zone Development Standards for Nonresidential Development
Standard I-P Current Proposed Brings the development closer to
Zone Development Development conformance?
Minimum 25% 25.59% 25.66% Yes
Landscape Area
FINDING: The current tax lot is conforming with the I-P zone minimum landscaping standard. The
applicant is proposing to remove 674.5 square feet of landscaping for a new pedestrian walkway and bench
seating area.The replacement hardscaped area can be used to meet the L-2 landscaping standard as shown
in Table 18.420.1. The applicant's submittal demonstrates that there will be a slight increase to the onsite
landscaping after all of the proposed changes.This standard is met.
B. Landscaping and screening. All required landscaping, including landscaping used to meet
screening or tree canopy standards, is subject to the general provisions of Chapter 18.420,
Landscaping and Screening.
1. The minimum landscape area standard is provided in Table 18.330.1. Landscaping
standards are provided in Section 18.420.040. Any landscape area planted to the L-2
standard may count toward meeting the minimum area standard.
FINDING: This standard is addressed under CDC Section 18.420 of this decision.
3. The minimum tree canopy standards for the site and any off-street vehicle parking areas
are provided in Section 18.420.060.
FINDING: This standard is addressed under CDC Section 18.420.060 of this decision.
E. Pedestrian access.
1. Paths must provide safe and convenient pedestrian access from public sidewalks abutting
the site to all required building entrances on the site.A minimum of 1 path is required for
every 200 linear feet of street frontage.
FINDING: The applicant proposes to install this new ADA-compliant pathway between the parking lot
and the primary entrance for 7374 SW Durham Road. The applicant is not proposing any pathway
extensions elsewhere on site and the proposed improvements only effect a portion of the overall site.
The remainder of the site is legally non-conforming regarding this standard. Adequate pedestrian access
will be provided throughout the proposed improvements, and the remainder of the site will not become
further out of conformance with this standard. Therefore, this standard is met.
2. Paths must provide safe and convenient pedestrian access within the site between all
buildings,uses, and areas designed for use by pedestrians. Paths within parking areas or
along drive aisles are subject to additional standards in Subsection 18.410.040.B.
DMMtll2019 00032 Wood Vacancy 3 of 8
FINDING: The proposed path will provide a safe and convenient access between the building's north
entrance and the adjacent parking lot. The applicant is proposing a path within a parking area,which is
addressed later in this decision. This standard is met.
3. Paths must extend to the perimeter property line to provide access to existing or planned
pedestrian facilities on adjacent properties, such as trails or public access easements,
where practicable.
FINDING: The applicant proposes to install an ADA compliant pedestrian pathway directly between
the entrance for 7374 SW Durham Road and the parking lot,but is not proposing any pathway extensions
elsewhere on site. The proposed improvements only affect a portion of the overall site. The remainder
of the site is legally non-conforming in regard to this standard, and the remainder of the site will not
become further out of conformance with this standard. Therefore, this standard is met.
4. Paths must be constructed with a hard surface material and have a minimum
unobstructed width of 5 feet. (Ord. 19-09 §1;Ord. 18-28 §1) ■
FINDING: The applicant's plans illustrate that the proposed paths will be constructed of concrete and
will have an unobstructed width of at least five feet.This standard is met.
18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading
18.410.030 General Provisions
F. Accessible parking. All parking areas must include the required number of accessible
parking spaces as specified by the state building code and federal standards. Such parking
spaces must be sized,signed,and marked as required by these regulations and in compliance
with ORS 447.
FINDING: There are 202 parking spaces onsite, with two of the 202 spaces designated as ADA
accessible parking spaces.The proposal is to remove two parking spaces for a total of 200 parking spaces
in the parking lot. There are currently zero ADA van accessible parking spaces on site. ORS 447.233
requires that for a parking lot containing 200 parking spaces, there must be a minimum of 6 accessible
spaces and zero van accessible spaces. After all proposed parking modifications, there will be a total of
four(4) accessible spaces and one (1)van accessible space. The subject site is still two spaces short of the
minimum ADA parking spaces required in ORS 447.233,however the proposal brings the currently non-
conforming site closer to compliance. The two (2) proposed accessible parking spaces will be sized,
signed, and marked according to the standards of ORS 447.233. This standard is met
18.410.040 General Design Standards
B. Pedestrian access. Paths that cross access driveways or parking areas are subject to the
following:
1. Paths must be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a
minimum 6-inch vertical separation(curbed) or a minimum 3-foot horizontal separation,
except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are allowed for distances no greater than
36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement
materials are used;
FINDING: The applicant is proposing a pedestrian crossing of a traffic aisle that is 18 feet in length.As
shown in the applicant's submittal, the pedestrian crossing of a traffic aisle is less than 36 feet in length
MMll2019-00032 Wood Vacancy 4 of 8
and will be striped with a pavement marking to differentiate the parking spaces from the pedestrian
walkway. This standard is met.
2. Paths must be a minimum of 4 feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and
obstructions such as mailboxes,benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts; and
FINDING: The proposed 91 linear foot walkway and the pedestrian crossing of a traffic aisle will have
a width of five feet and will be free of obstructions. This standard is met.
3. Paths must be in compliance with applicable federal and state accessibility standards.
FINDING: The Building Division will confirm that this pedestrian crossing of a traffic aisle will be in
compliance with applicable federal and state accessibility standards during the Site Work Permit
inspection. This standard is met.
18.410.070 Vehicle Parking Quantity Standards
A. Off-street parking requirements. The ratios for providing minimum and maximum vehicle
parking spaces are provided in Table 18.410.3. If application of the maximum parking
standard results in less than 6 parking spaces for a development with less than 1,000 square
feet of floor area, the development is allowed up to 6 parking spaces. If application of the
maximum parking standard results in less than 10 vehicle parking spaces for a development
between 1,000 and 2,000 square feet, the development is allowed up to 10 vehicle parking
spaces.
FINDING: The applicant is not proposing a change of use at 7374 or 7376 SW Durham Road; the
existing use is an office use which is allowed in the I-P Zone. With a reduction in parking spaces from
202 to 200, the potential issues are primarily related to the off-street parking requirement. A minor
modification is required for this reduction of parking spaces because the application of a minimum
parking requirement is required according to CDC Table 18.410.3. The tenant space is part of a multi-
tenant commercial site and is therefore subject to the required minimum vehicle parking formula outlined
in CDC 18.410.030.D. The table below presents calculations of the minimum off-street parking
requirements based on this formula:
Parking
Use Square Minimum Parking Required before Percentage
Category Footage Ratio percentage Required Total Required
Industrial .8/1,000 square
Services 35,455 feet 28.36 100% 28.36
Office-
Non 2.7/1,000 square
medical 23,941 feet 64.64 85% 54.94
Light 1.6/1,000 square
Industrial 15,435 feet 24.7 70% 17.29
-- Min. Parking
Re.aired. 100.59
Total #
parking
re uired. 101
MMD2019-00032 Wood Yacancv 5 of 8
Proposed
parking
spaces 200
Parking
Surplus 99
FINDING: Staff finds that 101 parking spaces are required for the subject tax lot. There will be 200
parking spaces after the reduction of two parking spaces;therefore,there is a surplus of 99 parking spaces
at this site. Upon review of the applicant's plans and narrative, staff finds this proposal is in compliance
with all other applicable requirements of this title. This standard is met.
18.420.Landscaping and Screening
18.420.030 General Provisions
A. All required trees must meet the city's Urban Forestry Manual(UFM) standards as follows:
3. All other trees must meet the tree canopy site plan requirements in UFM Section 10, Part
2.
FINDING: The applicant's document from March 25th, 2020 states that the supplemental report will
meet all standards of UFM Section 10,Part 2.This standard is met.
B. Trees proposed to be preserved must be protected in a manner that meets the tree protection
standards in UFM Section 10, Part 3.
FINDING: The applicant's document from March 25`'', 2020 states that the supplemental report will
meet all standards of UFM Section 10,Part 3.This standard is met.
18.420.060 Tree Canopy Standards
A. Site tree canopy standards,which are stated as a percentage of effective tree canopy cover for
an entire site, are provided in UFM Section 10, Part 3, Subparts N and O. Parking lot tree
canopy standards are provided below.
FINDING: The applicant wants to remove 37 trees on the subject tax lot because the trees are located
too close to the building or because the trees were incorrectly cared for.This nonresidential site is located
within the I-P Zone and is required to have 33 percent tree canopy cover for the entire site. The
applicant's submittal demonstrates that there is currently an effective canopy coverage of 57.67 percent
and that the proposed effective canopy coverage 48.3 percent after all proposed modifications. The
proposed effective canopy of 48.3 percent is above the minimum requirement of 33 percent. The
applicant submitted a document on March 25th, 2020 to comply with all statements in Subpart O. This
standard is met.
B. An urban forestry plan is required to demonstrate compliance with site and parking lot tree
canopy standards and must meet the requirements of UFM Sections 10 through 13.An urban
forestry plan must:
1. Be coordinated and approved by a project landscape architect or project arborist, i.e. a
person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor, except that land partitions
may demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume
requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only;
FINDING: The applicant has added Ron Davies, an arborist with Beighley & Associates Inc. to the
project.The most recent documents to show compliance with the urban forestry requirements were sent
by him. This standard is met.
MMD2019-00032 Wood Vacancy 6 of 8
2. Demonstrate compliance with UFM tree preservation and removal site plan standards;
FINDING: The applicant's submittal demonstrates that the UFM tree preservation standards will be in
compliance with UFM tree preservation standards. This standard is met.
3. Demonstrate compliance with UFM tree canopy and supplemental report standards and
provide the minimum effective tree canopy cover;
FINDING: The applicant's submittal demonstrates on pages UPF-3 and UPF-4 that the proposal is in
compliance with UFM Tree canopy standards. In addition, the applicant states that the supplemental
report"PBC Bldg.G,UFP Supplemental Arborist Report"is also in compliance with the UFM standards.
The applicant calculated the effective canopy coverage for the site at 48.3 percent. This standard is met.
4. Demonstrate compliance with parking lot tree canopy standards, where applicable, by
providing the minimum effective tree canopy cover of 30 percent for all parking areas,
including parking spaces and drive aisles. Only the percentage of tree canopy directly
above parking areas may count toward meeting this standard; and
FINDING: The applicant's canopy plan proposes to remove 37 trees and replace with 27 trees. The
applicant's plan demonstrates that after all proposed modifications to the site, there will be a parking lot
coverage of 34.10 percent. The applicant's proposal will be above the minimum parking lot coverage of
30 percent. This standard is met.
18.765 Modifications
A. Definition.A minor modification has the following characteristics:
1. It has minimal impacts on surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities;
and
The proposal to increase the net landscaped area with new hardscape, convert one parking space into a
walkway and another parking space into an ADA loading space, and replace trees on the property will
have minimal impacts on surrounding properties,sensitive lands,or public lands. This criterion is met.
2. It does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard
or further out of conformance if already nonconforming,except where an adjustment has
been approved.
As demonstrated in this land use decision, the applicant is not proposing to bring the tax lot or the
structure further out of conformance with any standards of the CDC.This criterion is met.
D. Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a minor
modification application when all of the following criteria are met:
1. The proposed modification qualifies as a minor modification as defined in Subsection
18.765.060.A;
As shown above, the applicant's proposal is classified as a minor modification.This criterion is met
MMD201 9-0 0032 Wood Vacancy 7 of 8
CONCLUSION: The applicant is proposing to remove 674.5 square feet of lawn for a new
pedestrian walkway and bench seating area at 7374 SW Durham Road. There is a
net loss of two (2) parking spaces on site; one parking space is being converted
into a pedestrian walkway and landscaping strip while a second parking space is
being converted into an ADA accessible loading aisle. Two (2) existing parking
spaces are being designated as ADA parking spaces. The existing stairs and
pedestrian walkway in front of the structure are being removed and replaced with
an exterior stairwell.The tenant space primary entrance will be recessed from the
street-facing wall by one(1) foot. 37 trees are being removed and will be replaced
with 27 trees. No changes to the building footprint or use of the space are
proposed.
SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Final Decision:
A minor modification is a Type I procedure.As such,this decision is final for purposes of appeal on the
date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. This decision is not
appealable locally and is the final decision of the City.
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON MARCH 31ST, 2020,
AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 1ST, 2020.
Questions:
If you have any questions,please contact Samuel Copelan at (503) 718-2450 or SamuelC@figard-or.gov.
luifidatt ce
Jett_ s
March 31 ,2020
APPROVED BY: Samuel Copelan
Assistant Planner
MMD2019-00032 Wood Vacancy 8 of 8
/\ . lopiw, .,..„___..044_timmi_. ,r,.- .1, 51 1 . ,
,.\\V,Irr \ ,....-----„, SW D "7'7 '• I ...
11111111111111111111111111N
\ w,e, H i 0,1200
4DLtrr'1.-14'''''I1.1'.
42 r P a:1
41.1
.V / O V - .' t PROJECT 419480
\\\\''.------ / \--__ '...
651
,L.4:.. ,,,,:. i., , 1
43 6
/ �� o� �8 /� •I X I \ ' , -- \ '. i_
� ' F DIA165,161 .t z
11.1 I > I �a (3A 1 Ac) Z 8
/ I , • Q\\ 1U ��\ \ N\ ----TOTBCI&II 2<,„
cc ie
45 1 ; ) \ �aua og
kTi
/ \ Sing
O0
,• • 3iy VN�•mm
41111116.
Nyill Ir',.i 2 F4 2
25'Buffer around DIA O 11r
\\ *
a
_`�ra7 6 \�_ DIA BOUNDARY a
46, y,-", x :AIMX3 3 G •5 \ ZS'Buffer aroun• DIA
140
101P
,1
\ � \ #714 Cf ' so
LEGEND G., •� '
EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO �� 11:1(11. ,
64 ,_
REMAIN /;� �n . ( 197 ) l EXISTING TREES TO BE l V' Nillik •
CO
REMOVED /'+'''�- - ,
EXISTING STAND DRIP LINE TO "� OO��� ...\ / \ ir
S
T •
PROTECTION FENCING fyo
TREE TO BE REMOVED X 1- I '� \\\\ Si
II-
Description of site modifications .1+� �11011h_ `
4 k� I
• Adding ADA sidewalk from parking to building,renovating building entrances, (\ '(,\'o' I.
• I a
replacing existing stairway with new stairway and railing. L
• Renovating landscape adjacent to building only.Preserve noted trees and correcting \ � `� w arc
improper spacing and choice of trees. °49 / ' 19�. MATCH LINE SEE SHEET U FP-2 0 i�
• Minor adjustments to utilities or irrigation to maintain function. Z E x
l3T Betels papyifer•/Peper BimA ]33 707 - 2 N Q ,n 5A
• All materials stockpiling and equipment storage to be onsite,on asphalt surfaces 1) Site Tree Table 'Multi stemmed tree,calculated w/Portland City measurement ,^'„
only. EIOsnNG 24 Chamaewpads obtuse Gmdlisa Slender Hinoki• 123 44 - 2 N A)0 (� ar
25 Primus umlala Ifwanan/xwansan Cherry 81 221 2 y protocol:larges[stem+%(all other stems>1"). ik m
• Grading changes are incidental and areno excavation or filling is expected beyond Q GS rh O
limited footings sub rode that well outside of TPZ's.(therefore contour Tree It Genus sp./Common Name DBH Canopy Open v,Heritage [and.Newry.Preserve Comments(seeHog /Hogan Cedar 18 66 - 2 N A10 �toa
g ga.l Theta pliata' an' A AN51 300 8.7.3 standard violations,species is inappropriate for m so
(k) Stand Tree Rating Rating Y/M letteredrmtes right) 16 Thuja plicate'NoganyHogan Cedar 119 ES - 1 N NO
Al
p F-n�
space.Current management unsustainable for health of specimens. V v+ro z
Site totals 1 Thuja plicate'Ho n%Hogan Cedar 10.6 44 - N AID•1 27 Thuja pliate'Hogan%Hogan Cedar as 65 - 2 N MO ��
g' 0-sheared,1-topped,2-too close to aerial obstruction W to
• Trees Total its UFP 1-2) 2 Chuiapli padsoatusa'GranCedSlenderHank] AS 44 - N MO 28 Thujaplinta'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar• 165 - 2 N A)0,1 a G��
B)Bole decay.0-associated w/pruning,1-not associated w/
•• Total inventoried:Open grown-63,Stands-3 3 Thuja plicata'sagan'/oean Cedar 13.4 - N A)0.1 29 Thwaptata'Hoean%Hogan Cedar• 9.7 223 - z N A)0.1 pruning,2-good reactive wood growth inn
•• Total to Remain:Open grown-26,Stands-3 0 Thuja plicaa'Iagan'/Ho6an Cedar 129 203 - N A)0a3 30 Thuiapliata'Hogan%Hogan Cedar• 143 - 2 N A)0.1 - -
•
Total to be Removed:Open Grown-37,Stands-0 5 Thuja pnota'Hogan'/Isogan cedar 14.4 - N Mon 31 Thuja plicata'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar• 10.5 - 2 N A)0.1 C)Bronze Birch Borer,1-one or two visible gallery exits,2-staining DATE:2020-03-02
••• Site Canopy Area(Sheets UFP 3-4) 6 Benda papyifera/Paper Plan 15 1134 - N 8),D)1 32 Thuja Minim wogan/Hogan Cedar• 123 344 - 2 N A)0+1 of exterior bark,3-visible decay PERMIT/BID SET
7 Betula papylfea/Payer Birds 153 Pn4 - N q1,D11 33 Thuja puaa'Hngan'/NnganCedar• D - z N Mon DI Extensive branching ridge indicative of species,not confirmation
•• Existing Site Area: 1 sf(Approved Development Impact Area) of included bark.Rating of inclusion based on external observation: REVISION
•• Existing Canopy Area:ea:95,95,244 sf 21 Querns mba/Red oak 218 3019 - Y 34 Thuja protawogan'/slogan Cedar 6 n - 2 N 4)0+1 0-inclusion not likely,1-inclusion likely
•• Existing Canopy Coverage:57.67% 8 Cha"•nTPada ubtusa'Gracilis%Sknder Hinoki• 12.8 44 - N Al0 35 Thuja plisate'Hogsn'/Hogan Ceder• 93 tu N 0+1
•• Proposed Canopy Area:79,838 sf 9 Prunus send ata'xwamanY1(wansan Cherry 13.1 380 - Pa 2)3 36 Thuja plicate vegan%H 4) n agan Cedar 9 - z B A)0 E)Root crown deformiry.l-excessive surface roots,2-girdling,3- 1.3-31-33 nknrrrlpdda3an
•• Proposed Canopy Coverage:48.3% 10 Brume sen,lanw Io Li ewansan cherry 11.5 314 - N 213 37 Acer rubrum' whal/eawhall Red Maple 531 - 3 Y burl,4-decay 2.
• •ParkingLotArea:77,858of(SheetsUFP5-6) 1t Cbamaecyparis obtuse'Gnsciiis/slendereimkl 119 128 - N M0 38 PopuwsIremuioides/Quaking Aspen 73 133 - 3 Y APPROVED 3
•• Existing Canopy area:23,933sf 11.1 Sequoia glgantea/Giant Sequoia 42.8 962 - Y 39 Populua tremuieides/Quaking Aspen 6 176 - 3 y q
•• Existing Canopy Coverage;30.7% A 112 Arerpalmatum/Japanese Maple 10.3 491 - Y 40 TsugaMerephylla/Western Hemlock 17 934 - 3 Y Sarnuele,18:02:05,03131/2020
•• Proposed Canopy Area:26,548 sf 113 Betuiepapyilera/Paper Birch 16.3 1256 - Y 8)0 41 Aar rubn.m/Red Maple 21 1332 - 1 Y MI 6'
12 Styrau japonica/Japanese 7.5 314 - NAcerplatanoides'Fairview'/Fairview Noway
•• Proposed Canopy Coverage:34.1% 41.1 12B 380 D - 3 2 v w/i s d DIA
14 Ahamxgpadsobtuuognnre'/SlentlerHlnakl• 21.9 12 - N MD Maple I,Ron Davies,attest that this tree canopysite plan 7'
I - az Clue nbre/R.dw4 391 3m9 - r
Surd Nwenmly 14 Thula dicta'Hogan%Iggan Cedar 21.9 123 N M0 8,
mama 15 Chamaecyparis obnsz'Ganite/Slender Hhmkl 81 62 - N MO 03 Quentin cobra/Red O.4 I7.9 3848 - Y meets all of the requirements in section 10,part 1
44 Acermbmm/Red Maple 19.1 04 - Y 8)1+2 of the city ofTl ardUrbanManual
e•watp/a.nmaioer�r uct fP 8wC . kw1 ds % lY•Pr 16 eetula papyilea/Payer Birch 15.1 1139 - N CIS - �QY B Forestry
• sl•N•(wowsp/un unman erne naaNa Awc••emnga arsine ' I new*Cane• 17 Belida papYilera/Paper Birch 119 570 - N CI 2,0)0 45 Acer mbmm/Red Maple 224 1131 V 2094 tleadoown WW1 sv
ta•ryptgi 46 Acerrubrum/Red Maple 242 1409 - Y Iltlly pruning Issues
Thin.„/ m.nen•r•4 NNON.3 a.gerelega ••It• IM as eetula papyilera/Peper Birth 103 616 - N 01,D)o 47 Are,rubmm/Red Maple 27.2 ua - r tnl Ron Davies,Certified Arborist PN-6149A '-
ggd a iMl ewgdlw.al 18 straw a tyr=• 10.8 3m - N Di POnly issues
nWPgmY nlbiap14eI ty japan Ha/Japanese Cedar
48 Acer rubmm/fled Maple 20 1175 - V tnitv pruning issues
51nm•q•Yerydu•
•••d•uwimnrarr/deu/aR red a a 4x1 �1 Ced is papyN/Lebanon Cedar 1S4 ce N M2 ngissues,uarwMrme.... l lhlry prune
�e,.� 19.1 9etulapapylfeaPapereimh as >�5 V c)Sa>D 49 Aer bmm/R.tlMaple 17.1 648 a 1 V
Oil Tree Protection Plan _
O*Ale n lu 3 I 21 eetulapapyfera/PaperBirth D 7569 - N 50 gterrubrum/Red Maple 204 1254 O - 3 2 Y Ulry pruning issues UFP 1
W 1 21 Prun la arcnreltre/wp•r Bush/e el 590 - N 51 Quernanbra Red Oak 331 4256 O 3 3 Y
a asd 3 I 4m m IAlsw�l•�4 11.1 Prvnus r leraxwanan'/Rwanun Cherry 10.6 390 - y 52 Quenon mbra/Red Oak 23,8 1847 O 3 3 Y golf leen>I5 des
0 40 80'
_ ANutrubn/INtlNbr __ 7E,- a
TAW&NAM Nen�Itr[•nC•dw_-._ 22 Be/via cypher/Peper,Hee 142 804 - N
23 Chamaecypads obtuse'Gadllz/Slender Hinoki IS 44 N A70 53 Queros rubs/Red Oak 2) ED 7L7L17
2141 O 3 3 v
SCALE.1•=20
- - --- ---- __-- I 23.1 Querns rubs/Red Oak 23 2130 - v REMOVED PER PERMIT NORTH
AL /\ \-, o MATCHLINE SEE SHEET LIFT- 1 n"B'Nir
e S
N ♦ • -/- 19 ` Si A
8 ; 15A
114LEGEND
/ O
/ CT IA
EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO REMAIN PROIECi N 19480
EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED I" rl \ \ 50 �` d�_/ Q
EXISTING STAND DRIP LINE TO REMAIN \` , / Q
PROTECTION FENCING ' '\\ 50 � _ 'J l Z
TREE TO BE REMOVED XC
\ \ / I 2i
TREE PROTECTION NOTES a_ 38 Z
1. ONLY THOSE TREES IDENTIFIED ON THE APPROVED TREE REMOVAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM TREES WITHIN TPZ SHALL BE PROVIDED Q z p
PLAN ARE AUTHORIZED FOR REMOVAL. IEMPORAHY IRRIGATION WHEN ROOT/LIMB PRUNED OR WHEN Ga� I� O
Cf
1.1. STUMP REMOVAL ADJACENT TO TREE PROTECTION ZONES GRADE CHANGES OR COMPACTON OCCURS IMMEDIATELY !A� 52 acc RI
SHALL BE GROUND. RATHER THAN PULLED WITH AN ADJACENT TO TPZ. Ay 1016...... o C>
EXCAVATOR I. LANDSCAPING L.I.J 3
2. ESTABLISHING FENCING FOR TREE PROTECTION 2.1. IP OF PRESCRIBED COURSE MULCH TO BE PLACED N THE 27 i O
2.1. ESTABLISH FENCING AROUND EACH TREE OR GROVE OF TREES REMAINING ROOT ZONE JUST PRIOR TO FENCE REMOVAL. -- a N
TO BE RETAINED AT DIMENSIONS SHOWN. DIMENSION 7.1. PRUNING SHOULD BE ONE OF THE LAST STEPS PRIOR TO (�_ • / l 0 h.
DETERMINED BY CONDITIONS. SPECIES TOLERANCE AND PLACEMENT OF NEW TREES AND SIRUES, �KWI 05
RELATIVE HEALTH. 72. ADHERE TO TRENCHING GUIDELINES WITHIN TPZ AND AVOID 1 . J Cl C4 Q ri
22. THE FENCING IS TO BE PUT N PLACE BEFORE THE GROUND S ROOTS AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE W u�G CLEARED IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE TREES AND THE SOIL 7.3. DO NOT USE SOIL TURNING MACHINERY WITHINTPZ. Nip -�
AROUND THE TREES FROM ANY DISTURBANCE AT ALL TA, REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES BY HAND CAN BE '21.1 =y 2 n ry
2.9. 6
CONCRETE BLOCKS ENCING TS TO TST OFOR SECURED CURE TO HIGHT STEEL
GROUND WITH E�HASWEED
EE D WITH THE WRENCH SUTHATSE TF MECHANICAL DO NOT TURN SOILVgNTgGE3 \ l ' j as\\\\ U M K m m
FOOT METAL POSTS TO PREVENT R FROM BEING MOVED BY 8. NOTIFY PROJECT T WHEN LAST OF TREE MANAGEMENT VL CI\ / \ L7:or
W�j
CONTRACTORS,SHEET SAGGING OR FALLING (SEE DTL THE TASKS COMPLETED.ARE -r ♦ I 3
SHEET). UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE PROTECTIVE
FENCING BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF
TIGARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,PLANNING RECOMMENDED EXCAVATION AND PRUNING T PROTOCOLS WITHIN TPZ 2 .^oni
DIVISION.LLTHIS TECHNIQUE TO BE APPLIED WHEN ROOTS REMAIN BUT SOIL IS /� 3 _ • '
]4. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD HAVE SIGNS REPLACED WITH TOPSOIL OR COVER SOIL (OPEN ROOTING Iy \. / 25' 0.
ATTACHED SO THAT ALL CONTRACTORS UNDERSTANDIDE THE EXCAO FUR PAVING(WHEN ABANDONMANN USE OF HEAVY MECHANIZEDIAME O / tee
PURPOSE R THE FENCING. USE IMAGE PROVIDED FOR ARE5/I EXCAVATION PIED. RIEXC LARGER THAN L'IN DIAMETER O. Ic
CREATING LAMINATED/WEATHER PROTECTED SIGNS, ARE INTERCEPTED,FURTHER EXCAVATION WILL USE HAND TOOLS 1 Ce
I5. SIGN SHOULD BE PLACED AS TO BE VISIBLE FROM ALL SIDES OF THAT LEAN TOWARD Wes.FORK AND DICE USE VS'BLADED OR \ • ENS D.
A TREE PROTECTION AREA AND SPACED EVERY IS FEET R EDGE TOOLSN ALTERNATELY.USE AN AIR-OR HYDRO SPADE. / ,- •�.
LESS, a
9. MYCORRHITAL TREATMENT 1. DENNE THE AREA WITHIN WHICH NO EXCAVATION OR \ / LO
3.1. TREES B 7.1,11.1,112., I7.1, IS t 21.1,23,1 S.25 WILL BE COMPACTION OP SOIL SHOULD OCCUR. DAMSEL/ TREE \ ' / 39 0
TREATED WITH PLANT HEALTH CARE,INC.'TREE SAVER'PRIOR PROTECTION ZONE(TPZ)THAT IS NOT IMPACTED BY APPROVED
TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. (FOLLOW PRODUCT CONSTRUCTION FEATURE) \ O
INSTSTRURS/ 2, WITH A SPADING FOE(WORE THE TOPEOW AND ITS. MATT ON R)
4. ALL EPTIONS GUIDEABYNROEDUR LNZT THIS SHEPROHIBITED TOE E[DLFACE w REAM'THE TREEs TER TPZ. IOONTIAS Ik:..2g:1
(EXCEPTIONS SHALL WITHIN
LNETE STRICTLY
LEET) ROOTS OF r OR R IN AL ND AS SOON DEN AS
\ '\
4.1, NO TRAFFIC SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE TREE ENCOUNERED AND OBSERVE GENERAL DIRECTION OF GROWTH.
PROTECTION ZONS, NO VEHICLES OR REPEATED FOOT BE SURE TO LIMIT FORK DEPTH TO MAX. DEPTH OF S2
TRAFFIC WITHOUT PRIOR NOTIFICATION (TEMPORARY R PLAN'1'DNO/PwV.NO DETAILS FOR UNDISTURBED SOIL. \ \
EMERGENCY TRANSIT OF TPZ ACCOMPLISHED USING OPTIONS S. USING SMALLCLEAN SHARP BYPASS E EXCAVUNDIGATION
TIONSHEA LIMIT.
OTT BACK ALL \ \\ /
IN FIG.3 DETAIL THIS SHEET, ROOTS SMALLER THAN I'AT THE EXCAVATION LIMIT.
4.2, NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO a' LARGER THAN I"DU.ROOTS TO r PRUNE?WITH CLEAN SHARP
SOIL CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL.R WASTE. GROW SAW AWAY NEXT ON THAT HAND TBWARS RELY 53 Overhead wire,power '^
GROWTH FROM NEW CONSTRUCTION AND TOWARD REST M+
A.21. WASTE INCLUDES BUT IS NOT UNITED TO CONCRETE SOD,CONDITION AVAILABLE.
WASHOUT, GASOLINE. DIESEL, PAINT, CLEANERS. 5, BROOM AWAY SOIL FROM THE UNDISTURBED SIZEGRADE WITH \ 0 % lines on upper scaffold I
THINNERS,ETC, COURSE NARROW BROOM,PRUNING UNDER SIZED ROOTS AS
4.3. WHERE CONSTRUCTION TRANSITS TPZ, COMPACTION IS NECESSARY. ^'40'
CONDITIONAL-STRICTLY LIMITED TO THE FOOTPRINT OF THE 6, SLEEVES OR PIPING SHOULD BE PUSHED THROUGH TPZ WITH //��
PRE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION ELEMENT AND ADHERING TO HYDRAULIC OR AIR PRESSURE,NOT TRENCHED. \ / �LL
THE RECOMMENDED EXCAVATION AND ROOT PRUNING / 11^—
PROTOCO PROTOCOLS
5. TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM ANY CUTTING,SKINNING OR .Ali
I'
BREAKING OFBRANCHES,TRUNKS OR ROOTS. v
6. M LIEU OF DISABLED IRRIGATION OR INSTALLATION OF DESIGNED ''"3., ,
TREE PROTECTION SIGN PROCEDURAL NOTE TO CONTRACTORLL
°°
I.NoNit alaidiTg any ogler proHalon of EN T Or/I devebpnaN code ` S3
116 1
— any party found to be in Yblalan of chapter 18.790 of Me Tigard +KIII
development Twee pursuing to chapter t 16 of the Tigard municipal code N shell be be subject to a GPI penally el up to SSBD and shall be required In Y' I Q
remedy any damage caused by Me violation.such renredleNn Shan t/ a4•pv c
emove, or not be limited ro acthecordance
following'a(seam
18.7 a 08D(d) f M idar v w
i_gpii
removed but
not be li trees In accaMce wen replacement
ant of unlawfully
wf or bla mode nt n nc elmrA'Ji 4'1M'sntiv U u4 a
Me Tigard aevebanani code;and b)payment a an anducnal and 2
•
penalty repro citing the estimated vamp Sr any unlawfully removed o en N
Tree i1 r 1'LA 0
damaged tree,as determined using the most current international spdety II
U w O n
/t RbR iallWre's glade for plant appraisal. Z •Cn
2.If conswWon BONK'Is required within an proposal
nod 49e protection .II > m VI 0
zone. Me project admits. shall prepare a proposal detailing the I F N O.
caHWcngn techniques to be employed and the likely impacts to No bee. MINN - •I �•• V j EH Z
• i Me Proposal shall he reviewed and approved by the city arbonst before '!MIN ' HYedee Lc�aMa 4,*,, I•LI cc • 90
proposed wwk Mn proceed within the Sae protection zone,The city i PB inches I elnrNr �� c-' Den y n 0
rotectiori. adpate may re9 ti cMngesp te aonmrr.Tda pqN edoMl abang�:� 4 ch 0Mon site while work 9 M(t the Yee ndlor on acne and N d^n
submit a summary port CerlHyi g that the won rred per the DATE:2020-03-02
proposal and Rite. anrgeNIWs prim
AV.(the MOM anwor ornery of Ina PERMIT/BID SET
3. N FIBRrtl9dB end rodprda a..AI den WWbrE!'CP7 REVISION
,e No canWcti cfivay o/W be done wldvn the TPZ zme unbss the
project abnliel is on site. el/bMr Shall prwlde adMsl WM notice etTWISTED
bast2Mys pier to sbMrq wok*Min TPZ. i' t2'-n'VAx 1pup wrrpr
4. Contractor shall account fa this coordnalon process in Ne ;r uxa rr era rurvm t
O n e ••SOWI/ER TIO • ^�4CY5''IOV NSA`.C"^4 O/VUV15I,XM'H �i..�u kw4.5..x •.SOUS 2.
L 3
SOIL PREPARATIONS FOR PUNTWG AS SPECIFIED MERE ARE 4
EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT •
d)
TPZ CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE J 5.
6.
►\' � ,!� I. wH,YLDEERroTECIOM FENCING GESMRUSHTREE LA?TECIwRmxE I,Ron Davies,attest that this tree canopy site plan 7.
CITY OF TIGAR➢, RE/GIlLRY k till
ITPZITOMESETISFACTCHOFTATIANDRIWECTM0CRRT. .�:.. .. ..... ...:...—L
DftBCAR ASSOCIATES..... INC. Entry prohibited without ,���[�
z rdNovS NvrsrvEwwrsmMTxwpnweBnEIRGDs �.,�,,./ -.r 1- ;� meets all of the requirements in section 10,part 1 &
�l emea.:. IFoob.:Ia.:.:. ND TEN �l, of the city of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual
I-r, moat am a
rr prior authorization of I.
MTMIEIREEFEILVATETIMDWCDRIMPAIRBAHFXTBo DRAWN
B"
T. CHAIN LINK FABRIC TO BE MIN.11 GAUGE. GALVANIZED.I/ONO
RUSTED OR PAVED
EXCESSIVELY MALFORMED FABRIC-
OBTAIN BULDINGSRE WNSTELEDON PERMITS AS NEEDED TO SEMI KM V. ON LEVEL PAV OR COMPACTED GROUND.SECURE PANELS WITH Ron Davies,Certified Arborist PN-6149A
NHIWENENIS CONCRETE BASES FENCE BASES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT WEIGHT
Tigard City Forester or AND/OR SPREAD TO REEPANELSy SUPPORT DES UPPER.
3. AN OPEN SOIL,SECURE PANELS AND/OR RISER SUPPORTED CHAIN NNE
5. FOLLOW SITE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE DOTES ON THE SEDIMENT AHD PABRLC WITH 9'METAL T-POSTS.
a. PANEL-TO-PANEL MIN.UNLESS
SHALLHERBE MADE AT TVD LOCATIONS Tree Protection Plan _
Project Arborist BOSCHESON IMPROVEMENT
ROVE PER CONNECTION MIN UNLESS OTHERWISE DIMENSION
5. A FENCE SHALL BE H REED AT THE D:o E SHOWN PR/D ON THE U F P 2
B. CpIHETE$pL N%fOVENEMSb1E010.E PLAN, CONSTRUCTION
TO EACH TREE OR STAND 0 REMAIN,PRIDR O TIE
OSTART50 OF CRISTRUCTION /T\
6 NO GRADING,FILLING,EIAIIPXENT CPL.]ITQL,HOME ICA T ION OF \ 0 2U 40 GIy
T. REMOVE TREEPROTE TOFHEASUMDAFTE CONSTRUCTION MAR VT IS DRAINAGE.UTILITY TRENCHING,STOCKPILING,STORAGE DR OTHER I\�`u1T1`,
CCMRETEONAPgEQTOFNN OCCUPANCY ACTIVITY SHOULD OCCUR VILHIN THIS PROTECTION AREA.
TREE PROTECTION ZONE FENCING NORTH SCALE1•=UD'
rr/�/ ,, ' ..,/ i, ✓ / �41 1
r
�;•
•
•
n
J r \1111117
��
O \ won mv .
/ 42Q\ \ 41.1. \Alp
PN 6149A
CO �\ I / - � PROJECT#19480
4 `
i 6$• '+Ste, .! t Q
1"IP:1
� � -:r..4 3_ I -
7.1
11����� 43�' Naar .�,e... �` 6� �, ; p
�i�t�rel �' �' \ °'' " DIA 165,161 sf
- rp�. 11 \` 1O nl 9 r 4 liar es. 1. min in 3 Z
/ /I r' ��iI 79 ) .....,
S ri (3. Ac E
sz
� d �V (--0-
1!) �\ TO TBCI&II
w
_ „:„.:,
7 -- -------0--
46 0
dA4a a
. i
".
..... �,, i Au
„,.,.:,.
4 3 rl, Nall; NV
11.2 r:.. \
.- O 0, ''' 6� 4 DIA BOUNDARY
• 46 L J A 3 35 I
4 \ ix G / \ 25'Buffer around DIA
........:.....
,- _
i0 0zo-
0
Milt"
G� ��1��AID I��/�'jii► ��� (-t.:,,,3,3
,_! = ,
,_.,.
��o� Ili ( 197)
411110' i'm
°°� 15 Q
LEGEND �' � /���
EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO REMAIN 011�IUb II y II
pp���� l 1 ... lino
EXISTING CANOPY COVER(excluded by coed rating) 'PA., �� \\. $1 I nn�
IL
PROPOSED CANOPY COVER _\ �iA l4 , I
EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED 17 �C II,. I14' 17.1
EXISTING STAND DRIP LINE TO REMAIN r-1 1 > >- o:
1q ' gy� ' -\MATCHLINE SEE SHEET UFP-4 '° t (,J
Z 2Q
Tree Canopy Table *Multi stemmed tree,calculated w/Portland City measurement U w0N
NWON6 232 lrmhwM f.,W0aper& 133 • N protocol:largest stem+'A(all other stems>1"). z 3 rc
Cnori Canoprwer Canopy over %Canopy Opene.Nonage Cond.Present.Prewar Cr6naMlseeleta mt
red 24 'ciwtywlso rbluaa'Rad1WISIenda.Mnokl• 12.3 - _ N NO
Tree II Genus sp/Common Name Den 2s-Parma seruNmxwamae'/Krasn Chang 8.1 2n 2m 32 145 - r A)ANSI 3008.7.3 standard violations,species is inappropriate for > meo
dd) Slabs') Pulsing(10) over parking, Mend Tar N Wing Rating YM] notes right) N n G
zs.l Thule pllwa'wpn'Aspncadar 180 . N MD space.Current management unsustainable for health of specimens. V ma
1 Thule pceta%cbbaorm Cedar 10.6 • N M0+1 _.. ^g
26 Thule plre6811 001.1epn Cedar 159 '.. N NO 0-sheared,1-topped,2-too close to aerial obstruction W a
2 ChmrarypadsohhseGra achy derHr�l 8a - N AID
- - G n
n mule phata'No6an•/wgai Ceder 1ss N NO B)Bole decay.0-associated w/pruning,l-not associated w/
3 Thule plbta 3logn'/NNpn Cedar 64 - N Ab el 26 Thule Waft No an'Aaprl Costar 105 Nt/) u re a
4 Thule plhan,xgan,ANopn Ceder 129 _ - N No+1 __ -.I No+i pruning,2-good reactive wood growth
29 Thu a�llob'Nbpn'/II�OeEm• 9.] N Non C)Bronze Birch Borer,1-one or two visible gallery exits,2-staining 5 Thule skate Tlopn'oroin Cedx 1u - N Mote - B ry B PERM T/BD SET
03-02
6 detule wpyitere/PaperBirch 150 - N N,0)1 _.30 -Thule rla4140 NrAapl Cede 145 - � x--- Non of exterior bark,3-visible deny PERMIT/BID SET
7 Betels papyihra/PawrGirth 155 - N 01.0/1 31 Thulaplloa'Ibpn'/Ntp.Cedar• 185 - i I N 6)0.1 D)Extensive branching ridge indicative of species,not confirmation
3z Thulaplkaa'N1pn'/Nou.ecedar• 123 • N Q041
] °Nereumby Red Oak 21.8 3019 UN 6119 519 - Y 33 TM„lepmYbpn'/I -- - of included bark.Rating of inclusion based on external observation: REVISION
a
bgandr•
8 Chammorwris obuwGradlN'/SNnderwmki• 1]a - N AID - 120 - N N0.1- -- 0-inclusion not likely,l-inclusion likely
--34 Thvla plwtelRpMAapnCede 60 - N A)0a1
9 Prunus saturate xureman'/Cramn Gerry 131 - N q3 - E)Root crown deformity.1-excessive surface roots,2-girdling,3- 1.
10 Prunus semlaa%canon/Kvransn Cherry I2.5 - N Q3 35 ,Thu)apllrXalNpn'/INeplfedar• 33 - - N NDn bud,4-decay 2
11 Cbamaerypals obtusemmdIN'/0enderHneki 119 - N M0 - 36 Thulalxlsaalsogen lso nCady AO - _ N MOn
111 5e9uda(4mltea/G aise:ela 42J 952 95f 156 99A - y 3T Acermhme Roahall'/BowhM IRM Maple MO 531 265 1& aB.9 - Y 3
112 Acerpalmaam/Japanese Maple 103 491 431 0 0 - y 38 POpulustremulddes/Ouse&b.Aspen 73 113 113 0 0 - Y 4
39 Pnpulusrremuleides/°aekin6 Aspen 60 176 171 0 0 -
113 eetula o/Pager Birch 163 1256 1256 3414 5
) 0 . V 8)0 _40 Musa heI ue.hpla/Western Hemlock 17.0 604 7 0 0 - v -
U Wm lapeolapenica/lapatete 51ynx 7.5 " 41 Ace,rubom/Red MI6 210 1332 i 210 165 v all 6.
13 CMmarrypads obtuse riaille/Slender Heald 132 . N No -
14 Thule plicate bn'/Ibpoledr a9 • N MO 42 Quercus rubol Red OW 391 369 7e1 ]Ids 823 - Y 7,
43 gmrcusrube/Red Oat nJ 38411 3473 3176 as I Y I,Ron Davies,attest that this tree canopy site plan
15 Chameecywdso tusereadlb'/5tenderllnold 61 - N Al - i 8.
16 llehla wpylhra/V64161,8 15.1 '_ N 01 44 Aces rubmm/Red Maple 191 n4 ��p(�j 533 665 - jv_:d)1.2 meets all of the requirements in section 10,part2
]].] Ntuh wpyihra/Paparllrd l03 616 tlf 1461a) 0 - Y CIL D)0 _- 46 ',Acermknrm/Rea Maple 24.2 11341a 952 944 67 _ v _I UdednOvown of the city of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual
17 Bewlawpylfera/846,58d 119 - I N Q2,0)0 45 Anrrua.nm/RWof
1175
3
46 AcerMmm/sea Maple ]l] L109 UM 944 6] v 'Wry pruning Issues naawry By
18 styrafiponlo/Iapalesesrsra• 30a N nil 1Rlrypmnlng)awes a'--'
19 Cedars lebanl/abalon c.dr 164 - _-- „ ajz -- 48 A«rmbm M m/Red ph 2140 1135 96punks/Issues 933 79.4 - Y Mrs Ron Davies,Certified Arborist PN-6149A
19.1 8etulawpnfere'Poper Gird 13.5 105 1055 335(a) 0 - V C)2 0)0 49 Aces rubmm/Red Maple 17.1 641 4Y 111 - Y '''Wry pruning issues,8)1
A Benda papydara/Paper Nrd 120 „ 50 Aces ndlmm/Red k% 15 N W pte 204 1254 1006 818 - Y Wry pruning issues e
21 Bawls marfere/PaperDNh --- 42 „ 51 pumas cobra/Red Oak 331 1256 3131 3m 806 - V - Tree Canopy Site Plan
211 PrunusseewaaxaewMltrar�Chen, 106 390 390 Ola) 0 - Y 52 Ouanmsmbn/RedDak 238 134] 1832 1831 93z • V Bdelen>lsd.g UFP 3
22 Betels wpinhrt/Papernrth 132 N 53 4'3emn mlxal Red Oak 220 2141 2141 2341 100 - V ED
0 20 40 so
23 CMma:ayperls obtuse`Grrllis%Slender Nnoki 35 - N MO �� '
23.1 Quercvsmbra/Red Oak DJ 2J30 2130 19W 93.3 Y I// INDICATES OCCLUDED 6YCONDOtONPAT1r16
SCALE:1•=20
NORTH
• MATCHLINE SEE SHEET UFP-3
j1��a ���il ' S1 19 l
\ 1i � / 18 \ '
RSA
PN 6100A
S
/ y Pon Davies,
\7,603. 0u PROJECT U 19480
:� 2 oyr r R 19.1''
Ira 1
\ od U '' yr' e: \ Z
Ls S
i' . ;a ens at l:' ii ` I Q
LEGEND \ Mk - /:............
EXISTING CANOPY COVER TO REMAIN // CD
EXISTING CANOPY COVER(excluded by cored rating) �!'ji / / ` 'I, rli 3,8�� Z
/ / iwf IIr1}yag
vvWlJyy"titi..PROPOSED CANOPY COVER _. A ` /$2- ii , 2 u.:,
EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (' t 7 l '13 ` li i Lu
cc n.n
EXISTING STAND DRIP LINE TO REMAIN - 11*
/ / 0 m
Q 21 ` wagrn 8�
lliiiiririgiiiiii
.r�iiiaiii'n. aziC WW
`Sol �'iiiiiiii'niiic I'r 1 ....../ 1 _,,,0 0
24
N
,,
„.
..........
Stand inventory : : a7LID stl
AO 21.1
-- — a,•�r$ I I n
elxgrlxe ' ai
GenussP/fonvnnnof Oaminvrt MI MI Aw fad.Raring Dvedl Tod canopy x81xr' \ • S 2 — - ;
T°p UAW, rc r:: \ ,/ -arnv:nr
Stad9 Genus so/Common of Ned Aw DBNI Antod.Raring gad Pres. preeem Canmena \ ,� •��ulllt,., / "
faun gtel overf
Genus sp./Common of3rd Avg DYi3 Aye[and.Rating amnx pamnxlft't INN \ / ...dn.Ypi'' Lt
ThoJa plicate iHogan'/Nwai Cedar 11.0 2 Snell twig dlebadls broad,likely m AEI.
nor••.:. I I / -.—...-_: 39 p
1
51 pseudoauPmemlesil/DerNasFl 330 3 2 1151 ]6 4351 due roenlrtod.SudsasWrk \ 23.1 J
exhaust - ( 7
Pseudotsup needed(/Douglas Fl 25.5 3 ••• , f�I I p
52 Qsarnnprryana/Or.WNbork 21A 3 3 2237 0 2232 Aker overtopped. li S2
Nnus Nbra/Red Alder 7.5 2 \ .-.... .• \
isi
cn
_..... v• \ j Im
TnuJapliaa'11opn'/NPfa1CNr 2�5 2 \ t: Mills `lt
r1 mrnr
•
\ .�I
I
nu ias
I171
Tree Canopy Mille rare........._ — .
PROPOSED - 40
Overhead wire,power lines - rare .". '__`
IL
TreetlGenus no./Common Name CALIPER/ Canopy Canopy over Canopy over %Canopy Open Sell ...... .miie
C°mmems i F
M (fell-J SSW(ft') Parking(fe) nor Paking volume el", on upper scaffold-40' ':ie.............:n: f
$3\
A [espressos naotkatenzls'Green Anow/Green Arrow Cypressi T-g 50 50 -Vri:L::"' - \
B Wpessus noutatensis'Green Arrow/Green Arrow 0/press h9 SO so �, _ _
C Aar pal maam Yang°Kaku'/Coral Bak Maple 2' 313 315 4
O Cpessus nootbansIs'Green Arow/Green Arrow Cypress 7.9 50 50 } poi
E Aar pelmetum Sango Kaku'/Cod Bak Maple r 315 315 - V IL
F Cpressus noctkate%Is Green Avow/Green Arrow Cypress 7-6' 50 50 Z w¢
G Cspressus nootkaensis Preen Arrow/Green Arrow Cypress 9-8 50 50 Q i;su K V
H Cwn=nootkae3Iow'/een Avow/Green Arrow Cypress 79 50 50 0 wpry
I Acer palmawm'atensiw'/El reglow Japanese Maple Y 177 177 in 10o 2169 Q 3¢
1 Cowes=nootkatensis'Green Arrow/Green Arrow Cypress T-B SO 50
K Mar palmatum Sango Kakv'/Coral Bak Maple 2' 315 315 > m n0
L Cpressus nootkatensis'Green Arrow Green Arrow Cypress 7-6 50 50 V rir m2
M Mar palmanum Sango Kaku'/[oral Bark Maple Y 315 315 W a=Dss
NFF4
N aar pal malum Sango Kaku'/COM Bak Maple 2" 315 315 d U74 ex
O Copressus noakatenslr'Green Arrow/Green Arrow Cypress 2.8' S0 50 (n in2
P [espressos nootkatensis'Green Arrow/Green Arrow Cypress T-g 50 50
Q Merclydnasum/Vine Maple 67 Arboreal Bush DATE:2020-03-02
B Copressus noolkatensia Green Arrow/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8 50 50 PERMIT/BID SET
5 Copressus nomkasenels Green Arrow/Green Arrow Cypress -re 50 50
T Copressus noolkatensis Green Arrow/Green Avow Cypress 15 50 50 REVISION
U Mar minimum Sang.Kaku'/[oral Bark Maple 2' 315 315 315 100 3441
✓ Aar grlseum/Paper Bak Maple Y 491 429 479 100 0379 1
W Ater grlseum/Paper Bak Maple 2' 491 224 284 100 52m 2.
K Acergrisewn/Paper Bak Maple 2' 491 341 322 65.6 3819 3,
if Aar grlseum/Paper Bak Maple 1' 491 399 321 65.6 2757 Effective Canopy Cover
2 Acergriseum/Paper Bark Maple 2' 491 392 333 67A 2994 lot8 W ere.(te) 22 Canopy Area Dr Canopy Area 1.5a Canopy Area Mature Canopy Lae Wore L25x Mature Total Canopy Effective% 4
AA Aterrisewer/Paper Bart Maple 2' 491 386 384 782 334S (Ala)of Preserved (fel of Preserved NO of preserved Area(Hal of Canopy Area Canopy Area Area NO) Canopy(Canopy 5,
Trees(>or=pres. Stands(>or. Nadeeines(eV Man-Halve IWI of Native MH')of Planted Area/Lot Area)
G.
4998 vas IraH P p�1 % :Ire
Tn (p� ds
1 1 165101 rank ! 14N6 x _ 0998 I x x I 29838 e33 I,Ron Davies,attest that this tree canopy site plan /'
meets all of the requirements in section 10,part 2 s.
(^)Open Soil Volume=Taal Soil Volume,All minimums are met without Cowered Soil(parking requirement only) Q
I')Average Mature Canopy spread of spp.not listed on City Tree lists are drawn from the Following sources- othef of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual
Conifer Society,conifersociety.org Plant Lust,plantlust.com DRAWN m
Monrovia Nursery,www.monrovia.com Northwest Shade Trees,www.shadetrees.com
Ron Davies,Certified Arborist PN-6149A
(b) 'Green Arrow'cypress is a distorted variety prone to extremely narrow habit.Reduction of planting
proximity to habitable building is requested as 3'from building
No Soils which are growth limiting are present on site.Soils for proposed trees shall conform to specifications Tree Canopy Site Plan U F P 4
noted on Landscape Plan L-2.
o 0 o p'
SCALE r•a 29
NORTH
S
�a1 \ �' �iLL1 tl_ I
j €' (193 / SW DURH' a. / rrr,
��,:-/ '' dlM� �A St • C
NI
s��
�� � � / ' ,� PH�6149A
Q� �42� � 41.1 ,a �
11
�� -��- 'rr / o -- - ,�� PROTECT I)19480
zz I ( 1 164
e� v,: -tea
- ' � - - a
\11111
r -n. -�- rl/,1,, a
i r='r77' r 11 rI,
T7D N/ /III/TIN/rr 7.1 7 - iri!l /I �I, a 1 y: '- -' O
'GAiii�pta�p rI'III II l + ,� rll , . .. k " ir." $ Z
�► I E-77mmir,l 'y7.w�_n "ar-awar 8 ///l/r� \^ ° DIA 165,161 sf
""�aaMiTjaltu.uairlarai ia7/ar� '�BTira 3 II,,IA,,l :. Z 8
- 7wZwww.mnnsmoii�ainw��ii w .,,l•n w' wnn w Ifl
T
Q a
-- L J% ��n1 _ Ii I k iorJ/ 4 To reclau (3.79AC) u
it
-a Nax/.sai ^vwainapMin%infwanwwrj ,rNrwlMa
iw rl }Om
L 45a / nlalulma- I I I ,ww.....y
„ , IIl „/ l'l11 / / Il �' I/II/liIIlr -'' /,
I'r, wt,Oy
o�m
u m�
/ll, l� C' l ,,I /////l Ili�/// //I IIl l/I lI iIlU4 Q ^Z� .
' l /III/II1011I IIII l / II,01 ' IIIry ' \SI1 11\
.-
I _, �dl,I I I�/IlIl ,/,l,„ ,, I1 ,�,ll 1II1lllV / -_ MV0 2
2 mo-
./dii ,,/rrr,r,/rI,lI,I IIrIIr,,,/ ,,l , , , ly Trees within 6' of
�/�����%/%�/� II II i 11p3 11.2 king area Included in l .
_
iiii0 //1 \/ I /III � 'r ,kincannoi area - - - -
u.
II r hr � I
�
II/'i lli,�
' III /rIiIIII r/36 '/l l lll _y-
; I�''Il�,,,lI/l l I 35II/,/rl�lr/II/I
-• � 'r/I/ mini� 13 � hl;�/AI I
/ lll' li I l 1 N
, r l
Ir r,l
:://
/lil/2I
5
-B
u
ffer around DIA
, l %I l'r, ;lllI
� G "NI liI/I,I/IIII /,;; /�li t 1p//I' l�lII/'l�I1'/,7 / '1/ /,I II/imi i�////lI�/ I�I/lI/ I�/ l/ll/l,/Il,,lmI/,.____„/"./h
l // �Ie 52
I ' II / lll � /IVAlifirigrai
lIII IIa I IIII
1111121111111111111114 � l/lg11/11 l/,l I!II,IIa � 34 / ��;II/llll'h�'il��/ ���l�/ I I � II 1.. 441
A �I ,/ 1/III' ll / /,�II III/Iill
4 n IiI II 111 / l' , �'� \h. ;/iJ/l% 'Illl %'1 II!'
,�,;%ll� / �l4l,� 1' 4
;i/ lli� l1 �IiI \ ( 1 97 ) zhill//!�14,,/, i; ;+'' l7�� ;� l �iIil�lll�l�� �ll i�i� Ii �lll �l,Oi/10,1/4/III II4 I l ri /, l ' % I//rl/�NN 0 � rill /II ,/,,b iIIIII /,I /I! 15 Ill/� 1 r14 ,r I ; //0" .sms.
a�� N .1114 - �Iilll/lfl �//�Il Il llrl/r ` 3 „// rl1, IIr �
/ / H." 33i /hd1�///61/V, reI
�'�, - � 'Il ! ; I/I /l �
\1/4.7*
//0� il /,//ll/ll///;%'''���1lllly/; y, I,' / l�lIlll//1 ;
g //,„l/�/l ///// I ' Q,I' l�,II / ,/ /I ; ;yl � IlII IIrI as1 I
LL
ilkI ////%h /; //;/ #IIyi ;j % ; i� /,IriI// /bll///IAI ,/b/
\
V f
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET UFP-6 il!& ZW=
Q ,I ¢N
C,J we
2
Parking Tree Canopy Table `Multi stemmed tree,calculated w/Portland City measurement Q m 3 sT
protocol:largest stem+14(all other sterns>1"). > m'^O
CANOPY AREA CALCULATIONS
TOTAL PARKING LOT AREA WITHIN DEVELOPMENT sawn comments(see lettered A)ANSI 3008.7.3 standard violations,species is inappropriate for w 11,01 z
Tree a Genus sp./Common Name O01 Canopy Canopy over Canopy over %Canopy Open v.Heritage Cond.Pres rv.Preserve PI1J 2 g
IMPACT AREA 77,858 SF WI swept') PaIldnet l owe parking sand Tree Rating Rating VW m'es right I space.Current management unsustainable for health of specimens. O. G 1Y.o
QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY COVER 7.1 (bomsn.baOM/Red Oak 211 3 2326 1809 59.9 - 9 Y 0-sheared,1-topped,2-too close to aerial obstruction U) ,n.p.
at Sequoia giganaa/Gant segucia 421 962 956 956 934 - 3 Y R)Bole decay.0-associated w/pruning,1-not associated w/ DATE:2020-03-02
(Tables continued on sheet UFP-4) 113 Smola papyllea/Paper Birch 163 P156 456 341a) 0 - 3 V e)0 pruning,2-good reactive wood growth PERMIT/BID SET
EXISTING CANOPY TO REMAIN: 23,933 SF 12.1 eetva papYi ora/Paper Birth too 616 616 146(a) 0 - z r CI101e C)Bronze Birch Borer,1-one or two visible gallery exits,2-staining
PERCENTAGE 30.74% 111 Betoiapapvitea/PaperBirth 133 1055 1055 335(a) 0 - 3 Y C11,o)0 ofexterior bark,3-visible dewy REVISION
211 Prunus serulaa'xwangan'/Kwansan Cherry 06 390 no 0(a) 0 - 3 Y DI Extensive branching ridge indicative of species,not confirmation
PROPOSED CANOPY AREA: 2,615 SF 211 Quemaaba/Red Oak 210 2130 2130 1903 g33 - 3 Y of included bark.Rating of inclusion based on external observation: 1
PERCENTAGE 3.36% PI. 25 Pmnus Amiga%wanaan'/kwanan Cherry 61 221 221 32 14.5 - 2 Y 0-inclusion not likely,1-inclusion likely
37 Ae,ruhrum'lowball'/BnwhalI Red Maple 110 531 265 265 499 - a Y El Root crown deformity.l-excessIve surface roots,2-girdling,3- 2'
TOTAL PERCENTAGE: 34.10% 41 Mermbmm Ma/Red ple no tax ev3 2m ws - 1 Y tilt 3.
42 0uernamba/Red Oak 39.1 3319 2BN 2485 823 - 3 Y bud,4-decay
4.
OPEN SOIL VOLUME REQ.FOR PROPOSED TREES" 44 Oce rib to//Rd0 apl 39.1 3019 2884 nw au - 3 r
44 Mermbmm/Red Maple 19.1 gee gas SE fibs - 1 Y BI 1.1 1,Ron Davies,attest that this tree canopy site plan meets 5
EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED 17 45 Ater ransom Maple 224 1134 1134 942 833 - 1 Y 2056 dead all of the requirements in section 13 of the city of Tigard 6.m
46 Mermbmm/Red Maple 242 1409 1004 944 67 - 2 Y Utlty pouting Issues Urban Forestry Manual 7'
47 Merrvbmm/Red Maple 27.2 1175 952 835 728 - 2 Y Utlry pinning iswe$EXISTING STAND DRIP LINE TO REMAIN �� 46 Acerrubmm/Red Maple 20.0 1175 965 933 39.4 2 Y Miry pruning issues g'
49 Acerrubmm/Red Maple 17.1 648 549 448 69.t - 1 Y UttlypmningissueaB)1 Ron Davies,Certified Arborist PN-6149A
50 Acerrubmm/Red Maple 20.4 1254 1045 1026 818 - 2 Y Utley pruning issues nREV.^J R.
51 Quemu subs/Red Oak 311 4256 3431 3431 816 - 3 Y
52 Queroa mba/lied Oak 270 2141 2141 2191 99.2 - 3 Y Bole lean al5 deg Parking Lot Tree
53 Quema mba/Red Oak 2J.0 2141 2141 2141 ]W - 3 Y
23933
Canopy Plan UFP-5
4) iiii
17jg1
NORTH SCALE:1•=20.
7 o MATCHLINE SEE SHEET U FP-S q/��,y,
\ monesnxuu70. 'l/,l
rrri
/ �� ITN 29 v '4 '11/1 Si
\ �runai //�� q// —
/
18 28 //1;4;r iSA
1\ /r, O.
\ lll ,, \ ,��,/,,j 1/j1�,,�1 cn slesn
____ . ''l J/l1/NJl1/Il/l1 PROJECT#19480
50- 19.1 ;1,1/J1//,l/Jl!/,1
ii , 0
\lc 0 ., or,,/,,/ ,/
\ -� 10////1//I11/l z
11/11, ll,ll,////11.1 11
l �,,y,/Ill ✓ � iJl �l//liJ/11,41
..4i 'I ^ : 1 µ blii/1/J/ /,ll,�l1,I r \ ''"'Ill1/IJ�I,��ll/ll O
(4, 7` ' !._ IJ/�/14/I' i -- Only Trees within 6 of ,/rJ,i,/ /i 38
1 1lr ,
7;4, .lf.•//�//�// / ' G y parking area included in ���/1��'� � g
rry.� .;. .:::W 1 1/, lyl 1 ,,1 ;1/1 /I1/h1''1 a
'vw:_r^r ivies 11/l lI/1 'I1'll ,N Ifn
parkingcanopyarea �j11/1/11,1/l1 r
,I/,l,r /1 a W,r I
� n �(/ lI lI I , ,ll ,l I.,II ,,l l/ll/III W Y
//�, l,l l,1 /l,lll „ ' \ 1 /
�0 7 1/Jl�,111/1w/ llll' 11/1/0• 27 ,�Illll l0,i/ cc v
ter ° ll/l'lll' —`�
��� Y17flW�l�l �✓ 4I��///l//////////''10' /. ''''/''''''/' 'n :I;
pn. I l 1I j1 /I l' 1 'I /'N'' 'Og
h 114 1/ 1J1/1/,1,1 21 - ib/// , / t'1"1„ m
FvA\ ` ',ll�%I���////4/////I l lr id! �/2.1.1 26 //,///////a x,, illVJ,7,1
p
• all.YYi.... Il 11/ l J1Il/�,1//lJl ll/�l1/l/1 I /r/,1/ll 11/// NI EC TN,
.p /I/,II Il11/1 /lIl II I ,1 ` 2.�i°van
lI 1j11'llllll I1111/1l, I/I , �,�1ll/l,I I/ d
�Q� ,///Jl,/�,1/1//I ll 251 ,11O
Open Soil Limits for Proposed t' /,N/ //l/,1/J///,r//l / /i;!1/Ii///
Parking Trees(typ.) ) e :P1t%a1 ,m, �IIJ/�/���/l',�lll�h ✓ �� 23� 2' ,ida,a,,,/ ;;
1ug(un6tnr�1 N1 r ... bill l N/ a
xskmn an� il�,/Ir lrl lrl l,/ ���i, Z� �IIIIIII/I
1 1 I 1/l I , s ry s l,l,ll/,l
Only Trees within 6' of ,, ,,a,m //�//���///Il �)h)�I�)�� �//�i///�' �25'Buffer around DIA
CANOPY AREA CALCULATIONS l/l//1 /Jill: {_ , \ „/,/l,,I 39 0
parking area included in '11immia ,1 I/11/„/ ,; , , , /,/,,1,/�/, o
TOTAL PARKING LOT AREA WITHIN DEVELOPMENT _, ll7 Llaii Jr ' 1Illllll' //l J/1/N ,'�.l�II l 1 1�'1 CO
0
IMPACT AREA 77,858 SF ill//l� Parking canopy area M! I h� — 23,1 - //�l lI/J�,J�l�/I III/��1��1���
[,li, \ i 1 /�l I/�(1// IJI�I'1/ll1II/il/ll 1
QUALIFYING MATURE CANOPY COVER -- n -2, l�// l 1, 11/11/ 1111/l/1/1/I S2
EXISTING CANOPY TO REMAIN: 24,119 SF 1
�- rrr�,.,. __.. l/!JJ/r llllllll r I /I 1
PERCENTAGE 30.98% �' -� a iNI°- • I I I �l I l /l , ,l I I
l h 111 ll i///// l�/1/ ll j'l1/1//"/I 1
R.a1 gNlR R, � '111/ll,ll,ll/I lIII II,I,I,III I11. I F.
PROPOSED CANOPY AREA: 2,615SF \ Rho:sltsl�M.ar ill,/1�,�lillllll�lllll'lj lllllil,l, I I
Till;wam a� I I,0 I,1///,11,//,,1, /Il I
in
PERCENTAGE 3.36% upwsi llll J! �,,; 1'I II ,Jll,ill,,l,ll,lr//11,11,11/Illl ll Il,,l
\ Al,, 'r1/IIII,JI 111�ll1J1/������l�ll�l,��1,�111/I�l///!J,//,l,
TOTAL PERCENTAGE: 34.34% i J/JJ 1/
��iYiiJY 1 / 1/��11 i�11/llll l/lli�ll/ /.///1/N1 1 a
V '�•��� ) I 1�11/�lf/1/ll�ll��l�lil�ill�l��lJ/11I1�1''1/ill ill 111
OPEN SOIL VOLUME REQ.FOR PROPOSED TREES" N -' �'�/ n r '1 I I ' I I jlIl ••....
a e e p a9 I/
s ::emit sane %s:ss //,
EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED 17 Overhead wire,power lines` �,;,t, = �/ •::•• 40 4
• Iiir-6:1 au 1 I
on upper scaffold 40' arts:malpr
EXISTING STAND DRIP LINE TO REMAIN •• - rY.
o
Parking Stand inventory •' '- } m°z
cwsrno A _ I V E
Genus sp./Common of Dominant Avg09N1 Ancona.gating Overall Taal O�1 Z via
Canopy
Stand Genus sp./CommonAv
Common of2nd a0BN2 AveCond.Rating 2 Stand Pres. " Preserve Comments u Top!
g des
Ratln CampY(fel over UMz
Genus sp✓Common of 3rd Avg OBR3 Avg Cold.Rating]
ra
Thule Ocala'Nogan'/ilogan Cedar tilt 2 I�Ww Small twig dlebeek Is broad,likely > mH°
Si Nendonua mentlesll/Douel. Oftsfi 19.0 3 2 q US �1 due toenvir cond.Such as buck U ''nq
exhaust LLI ^
ao.o
185.0 N 6.i.
i^3
DATE:2020-03-02
PERMIT/BID SET
Proposed Parking Tree Canopy Table REVISION
PROPOSED
CALIPER/ canopy Caraprowr Campy over %Canopy Open5011 Comments
1
Tree X Genus sp.I Common Name M 2.
(Mil gm PaYbg IN') over Parking Volume
1 Aces palmatum'Flreglow'/Fireglow Japanese Maple r 177 177 17) 100 2169 3.
U Arm palm.mm'Sango Xaku'/Coral Bark Maple r 315 315 315 100 3441 4.
✓ Am,griseum/Paper Bark Maple r 491 4/9 979 109 89)9
W Peer gnseum/Paper eark Maple r 491 264 289 100 57E3 5.
It Aar gnseum/Paper Bark Maple r 491 341 322 65.6 3819 I,Ron Davies,attest that this tree canopy site plan meets 6.
Y Aargnseum/Pam Bark Made 2• 491 399 321 65.6 2757
z Acergnseum/Paper Bark Maple r 491 392 333 67.4 2999 all Of the requirements 10 section 13 of the city ofTigard7.
AA Aarg,lsaum/Paper Bark Maple r 491 386 384 78.2 3345 Urr ban Forestry Manual 8.
2615 45
Ron Davies,Certified Arborist PN-6149A DRAWN BY.
(^) Open Soil Volume Total Soil Volume,All minimums are met without Covered Soil r�/� Tree
(^) Average Mature Canopy spread of spp.not listed on City Tree lists are drawn from the following sources. Parking ng Lot I TI�r
Conifer Society,conifersociety.org Plant Lust,plantlust.com
Monrovia Nursery,www.monrovia.com Northwest Shade Trees,www.shadetrees.com (/►
(a) Trees farther than 6'from parking area are not eligible for canopy applied to parking are coverage. / \ Canopy Plan U F P 6
u 1 0 20 40 so
NORTH SCALE,l'-20'
City of Tigard RECEIVED Case #: /V14 2o/9— L 2.
COMMUNITY DEVEI.OPMENT 4i'[5AIt'[ Q NT
CITY OFTItt .'=RD .
TIGARD Master Land UA311ca lion
LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE
❑ Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) IX Modification: I ) Type I O Type II
❑ Adjustment U Planned Development:
❑ Annexation O Consolidated Plan
❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment O Concept Plan
O Conditional Use O Detailed Plan
❑ Downtown Development Review: 0 Sensitive Lands Review:
O Type I O Type II n Type I O Type II El Type III
O Adjustment 0 Site Development Review: O Type I 0 Type II
❑ Home Occupation—Type II 0 Subdivision
❑ Land Partition 0 Temporary Use Permit
O Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation O Urban Forestry Plan:
0 Marijuana Facility Permit O Modification 0 Discretionary Review
❑ Miscellaneous: O Zoning Map Amendment
El Type II C] Type III
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project name: — Wood Vacancy Minor Mod
Brief description of project: The intent of this minor modification is to renovate a building entrance for a
new space that will be created with the construction of a new demising wall; replace existing exterior
stairs with new stairs and railings; and pedestrian path and accessible parking. l.API I u rA wo61- l5-11 411
via 0. 'tov c A e,,,4
SITE INFORMATION
Location (address if available): 7376 SW Durham Road, Tigard, OR 97224
Tax map and tax lot number(s): 2S113AB01400
Site size: 5.38 Acres Zone: I-P
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name: Robert Bumcrot (Pacific Realty Associates, LP.)
Mailing address: 15350 SW Sequoia Pkwy, Ste 300 _ City/State: Portland, OR — Zip: 97224
Phone: 503-624-6300 Email: permits@pactrust.com
Applicant's representative:
Phone: Email:
City of Tigard • 131.25 SW Hall.Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 2
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION ® Same as applicant
• (Attach list for additional owners)
Name:
Mailing address: City/State: Zip:
Phone: Email:
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
In addition to this application form,you must submit all required items listed in Subsection 18.710.030.0 of
Tigard's Community Development Code. If you are unsure what is required with your application,please contact
the planner on duty at 503-718-2421 or tigardplanneronduty@tigard-or.gov.
I certify that I am the property owner or I am eligible to initiate this application, as provided in the Tigard
Community Development Code. To the best of my knowledge, all the information provided within this application
package is complete and accurate.
Robert Bumcrot (Pacific Realty Associates, LP.) f l j (l I I
Appli is signature Print name Date
Robert Bumcrot (Pacific Realty Associates, LP.)
Property owner's aturc* Print name Date
Property owner's signature* Print name Date
*The owner must sign this application or submit a separate written authorization when the owner and applicant arc
different people.
`'n STAFF USE ONLY /�
Case No.: MArlt] O/�" et . Application fee: ♦ Received by:by �y Date: 2/L'r i g
Related Case(s): Determined complete by: •QC. Date: d3i 0—V I
�-. emnand,v 114 1WMAIMAerg,
City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hal]Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-71.8-2421 • Page 2 of 2
PACTRUST
October 17, 2019
To: City of Tigard Permitting
Re: Approved PacTrust Signatories
To Whom It May Concern:
The following individuals are authorized to sign permit documents on behalf of PacTrust:
Richard J. Krippaehne
Ryan McGuire
D
Matthew Oyen RECEIVED
Robert Bumcrot
Michael Monnier DEC 12 2019
Ronald Tesch
Martin Hanson
PLANNING�/ENGGNEERING
Michael Wireman-Nothwang
Aaron Jacobs
John Wiitala
Elliot Wiitala
Very truly yours,
PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Peter F. Bechen
President and Chief Executive Officer
•
- a�l� o0U __.
Coeey
dD PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT DEED RECEIVED
� . WHEREAS, Pacific Realty ,Associates L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, is the
C owner of Tax Lot No. 01400 of Washington County Assessor's Map 2S1-I3A8 and Tax Lot Z 019
No. 00102 of Washington County Assessor's Map 2S1-13AC and intends to adjust the DEC 1 2
property lines between these lots as reflected in the accompanying legal
descriptions and as shown an Survey No. 24884 In Washington County, and in the City CITY OF TIGARD
-a $r of Tigard; PLANNING/ENGINEERING THEREFORE, for the purpose of a property line adjustment between these Tax Lots
8 in accordance with the description in the attached Exhibit A.
W
Pacific Realty Associates L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, as
"Grantor" hereby grants unto, Pacific Realty Associates L.P., a
Delaware Limited Partnership as "Grantee" the real property described
in Exhibit A.
The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, stated in terms of
— dollars, is $0.00.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor does hereunder set its hand this 19th day of
January, 1993.
--� V PACIFIC REALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P., a Delaware
Limited Partnership --
,0 By: Pa rust malt ral Partner
By: .
Richard P. Buono, ice President
STATE Of OREGON )
) ss
County of Washington )
,,,y Personally appeared before me the above named Richard P. Buono who executed this --
instrument and acknowledged to me that this instrument was executed voluntarily and
freely. -
' IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 19th day of t
January, 1993. �.,
Loil
Notary blic for regon
My Commission Expires: -H/�/9�'l
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: _.
-^+ Pacific Realty Associates L.P.
15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway, Suite 200 -
-: Portland, OR 97224 ormcuLsPaL
ti•-.MARJORIE CALLAHAN 4,-
TAX STATEMENTS SHALL 8E SENT TO: v"' - NOTARY PUBUC-OeeoON
'fs= Pacific Realty Associates L.P. `'':� COMMISSION NO�015665 - __--
-= 15115 S.W. Sequoia Parkway, S1ite 200 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNa 4,ION-- Portland, OR 97224
-_— djdsd lot 00102 blame 1''3
— -'r' ,tr Tn?17 W' 1 f t eW1- 34 l,"•'�"' TM 4o- s ; `>�" ..
--- t ' 1✓ '4 �,y. �G.r Tyr r I ,tf C.T t', FrF _'-._
�.�_.....- it � r`L}Sltn�' Z-�'�y, 2 ,'J }l F��1I) i n5 vy __..
^a 4
1 ; S,J Yrt r
.J , y k lj Jf' •, y.lr �'-, • Lr r .y __
-� + I Sf r 'J Y f�1P J Y! j {1. l F Y # _
'i1?,'41 i1. ,".1 'rl'MJ4t,•.:. ' ,,.. ,^SS-w;
-- .fie:
Q� •
-- ------
NFaw„�esPsar�a._ i =.rs+e..v,--�-.• ---
ece - - -
--- �� �ff � 4�.t..+Pt FW" . .,. us .we
-�."�.Y � L r wlryAnr.:� t�I.� � .:-_ . .. R. , r A .k.1'�
P•
4
1,1)
Jim Weddle ----
( Pe� Associates,Inc. 7enuary 13, 1993
Ise File No. 92-2023 ILL
aA
IR
TRACT 2
1"7 DESCRIPTION:
A tract of land situated in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 13,
Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, and a part of "Council L
View Acres No. 2", City of Tigard, County of Washington and State of Oregon,
more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at a Washington County brass cap monument marking the center of
said Section 13; thence North 00°02'33" West 1318.12 feet; thence North 89°
' • point of Intersection of the easterly ri ht-of-
the
Y 9
28 26 East 8.85 feet to
way line of S.W. Upper Scones Ferry Road, 60 feet wide, with the north line ----
of said "Council View Acres No. 2", a duly recorded plat; thence continuing
on said north line, North 89°28'26" East 292.43 feet; thence South 00°33'01"
East 30.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the following described
parcel of land; thence North 89°29'10" East 424.42 feet to a point in the
vest right-of-way line of S.W. Durham Road, 72 feet vide; thence along said
line, South 00°31'32" East 12.57 feet; thence North 89°29'10" East 3.00 feet
to a point In the vest line of said S.N. Durham Road, 66 feet wide; thence
along said line South 00°30'17" East 252.13 feet; thence on the arc of a
tangent 233.00 foot radius curve left 105.61 feet through a central angle of
25°58'16" (chord bears South 13°29'31" East 104.71 feet); thence leaving
said street, South 89°29'10" West 522.02 feet; thence North 0D°35'50" Neat
56.98 feet; thence South 80°57'34" West 48.38 feet; thence North 00°40'40"
West 100.20 feet; thence North 89°28'50" East 120.00 feet; thence North 00°
33'Ol" West 210.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
CONTAINING THEREIN an area of 3.983 acres.
Bearings for this description ate based on recorded survey No. 22374.
REGISTE0.lp
PROFESSIONAL
"ND SU.VEY•R
OREGON
IAhd>is Oy. 13DLE --
l�
1750 S.W.Skyline Blvd. • Suite 105• Portland,Oregon 97221 • Telephone(503)29240E3•FAX(503)2E2493E1
• • '
•
•
STATEOF 09EGON SS
county ot Vieshintitott
ol Aosesomot4
Worry R.I' liru.4n.froir al Con-
innallon aztikyrrt* oartitY
unyonces t of
that OW
rocato0
stn4 '• of =1-
•
4"43-rrreg __
Doc ; 93004086
Rect: 92505
, I
01/19/1993 02:22:33PM
__•
. • , . . , _ .
. _
•
_ .
RECEIVED PACTRUST
DEC 12 2019 75350 S1v Sees 10,5 r 5 ,, J{ so;
CITY OF TIGARD P rtlanci OR 972zc
PLANNING/ENGINEERING 503.62,1 KMpartrust.cam
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 6, 2019
TO: City of Tigard - Planning
FROM: Pacific Realty Associates, LP.
SUBJECT: Pbc197—Wood Environmental Vacancy— Minor Mod Narrative
7376 SW Durham Road, Tigard, OR 97224
The intent of this minor modification is as follows
• To renovate a building entrance for a new space that will be created with the construction of a
new demising wall
• Replace existing exterior stairs with new stairs and railings
• Construct an accessible sidewalk from the entry to the existing pedestrian path and accessible
parking
Parking has not been affected based on this alteration.
Landscaping area percentage is 25.59% (59,981.82 SF) existing and 25.66% (60,138.57 SF)
modified.
The work will have no impact on surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities.
The work will not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standards.
The current use is office. B occupancy and storage, S-1 occupancy. Use to remain the same.
MMD2019-00032 Supplemental Information
Part 1: Tree Information
• Trees
o Total number inventoried: Open grown - 63, Stands- 3
o Total number to remain: Open grown - 26, Stands - 3
o Total number to be removed: Open Grown - 37, Stands—0
• Site Canopy Area
o Existing site area: 165,161 sf(Approved Development Impact Area)
o Existing canopy area: 95,244 sf (effective, before)
o Existing canopy coverage: 57.67% (effective, before)
o Proposed canopy area: 79,838 sf (remaining effective + proposed, after)
o Proposed canopy coverage area: 48.3% (remaining effective + proposed, after)
• Parking lot Area: 77,858 sf
o Existing canopy area: 23,933 sf
o Existing canopy coverage: 30.7%
o Proposed canopy area: 2,615 sf
o Proposed canopy coverage area: 3.4%
Part 2: Missing UFM information
Please provide a statement and your signature to meet the requirements of UFM Section 10 Part 3
subpart 0 (below).
• O.A signature of approval and statement from the project arborist or landscape architect,
attesting that:
o The tree preservation and removal site plan meet all of the requirements in UFM
Section 10,Part 1 of;
I, Ron Davies, attest that the tree preservation and removal plan meets all of the
requirements in section 10, part 1 of the city of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual
Ron Davies, Certified Arborist PN-6149A
o The canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in UFM Section 10,Part 2;and
I, Ron Davies, attest that the canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in
section 10, part 2 of the city of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual
Ron Davies, Certified Arborist PN-6149A
o The supplemental report meets all of the requirements UFM Section 10,Part 3.
I, Ron Davies, attest that supplemental report meets all of the requirements in
section 10, part 3 of the city of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual
Ron Davies, Certified Arborist PN-6149A
Part 3: Missing CDC information
Please provide a response to each of the following statements:
A. An urban forestry plan is required to demonstrate compliance with site and parking lot
tree canopy standards and must meet the requirements of UFM Sections 10 through 13.
An urban forestry plan must:
Be coordinated and approved by a project landscape architect or project
arborist, i.e. a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor,
except that land partitions may demonstrate compliance with effective tree
canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open
soil volumes only;(response required) I, Ron Davies, am the designated arborist
for this project. Certification PN-6149A
1.
2. Demonstrate compliance with UFM tree preservation and removal site plan standards;
(response required) Sheets UPF-1 and UFP-2 are in compliance with UFM Tree preservation
and removal standards.
3. Demonstrate compliance with UFM tree canopy and supplemental report standards
and provide the minimum effective tree canopy cover,
(response required) Sheets UPF-3 and UFP-4 are in compliance with UFM Tree
canopy standards for the whole site. Effective canopy coverage is total of(weighted)
remaining trees,stands and proposed mature canopy and totals 48.3% on sheet UFP-4.
Supplemental report "PBC Bldg. G, UFP Supplemental Arborist Report" is in compliance
with UFM standards. Effective canopy coverage is iterated in this report.
4. Demonstrate compliance with parking lot tree canopy standards,where applicable,by
providing the minimum effective tree canopy cover of 30 percent for all parking areas,
including parking spaces and drive aisles. Only the percentage of tree canopy directly
above parking areas may count toward meeting this standard; and
(response required) Tree canopy standards for parking are demonstrated on sheets UFP 5
and UFP-6. Calculations showing actual and proposed plantings over parking are taken
from tables shown and are copied on both sheets. Coverage percentage is 34.34% of
parking inside of Development Impact Area.
E. Urban forestry plan implementation.
1. Implementation of the urban forestry plan must be inspected, documented, and
reported by the project arborist or landscape architect in compliance with the
inspection requirements in UFM Section 11, Part 1,wherever an urban forestry plan is
in effect. In addition, no person may refuse entry or access to the Director for the
purpose.
(response required) Understood.
2. The establishment of all trees shown to be planted in the tree canopy site plan and
supplemental report of a previously approved urban forestry plan must be guaranteed
and required in compliance with the tree establishment requirements in UFM Section
11,Part 2.
(response required) Understood.
03/03/2020
PBC Bldg . G , UFP
Supplemental Arborist
Report
& Tree Mitigation Plan
Project Arborist: Ron Davies,CA#PN-6149A I Beighley&Assoc.Inc. 11284o NW Cornell Rd 97229
5036434796 I �,i�ii«bar-la.or
City Planner: Sam Copelan,Assoc.Planner I City of Tigard 1503-718-2450 I samueleWtigard-or.gov
It.Davies,CA#PN-6149A
Table of Contents
Project Summary 2
Protection and Fencing Specifications 2
Tree Planting Specifications 4
Stand Preservation and Planting Specifications,Soil 5
Inventory Tables
Full Site Existing Tree Inventory 6
Full Site Proposed Tree Inventory 9
Full Site Existing Stand Inventory it
Effective Canopy Calculation 11
Parking Existing Tree Inventory 12
Parking Proposed Tree Inventory 14
Parking Existing Stand Inventory 14
1 •
R.Davies,CA#PN-6149A
Project Summary
This report is in support of a development proposed for limited landscape and building renovations.
Description of site modifications
• Adding ADA sidewalk from parking to building, renovating building entrances, replacing
existing stairway with new stairway and railing.
• Renovating landscape adjacent to building only. Preserve noted trees and correcting
improper spacing and choice of trees.
• Minor adjustments to utilities or irrigation to maintain function.
• All materials stockpiling and equipment storage to be onsite, on asphalt surfaces only.
• Grading changes are incidental and no excavation or filling is expected beyond limited
footings and subgrade that are well outside of TPZ's.
Protection and Fencing Specification
1) ONLY THOSE TREES IDENTIFIED ON THE APPROVED TREE REMOVAL PLAN ARE
AUTHORIZED FOR REMOVAL.
a) STUMP REMOVAL ADJACENT TO TREE PROTECTION ZONES SHALL BE GROUND,
RATHER THAN PULLED WITH AN EXCAVATOR.
2) ESTABLISHING FENCING FOR TREE PROTECTION
a) ESTABLISH FENCING AROUND EACH TREE OR GROVE OF TREES TO BE RETAINED.
b) THE FENCING IS TO BE PUT IN PLACE BEFORE THE GROUND IS CLEARED IN ORDER TO
PROTECT THE TREES AND THE SOIL AROUND THE TREES FROM ANY DISTURBANCE AT
ALL.
c) FENCING IS TO CONSIST OF 5-FOOT HIGH STEEL FENCING ON CONCRETE BLOCKS OR
SECURED TO THE GROUND WITH 8-FOOT METAL POSTS TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING
MOVED BY CONTRACTORS, SAGGING OR FALLING DOWN- UNDER NO
CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE PROTECTIVE FENCING BE REMOVED WITHOUT
APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF PORTLAND BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES,
PLANNING DIVISION.
d) PHASED FENCING IMPLEMENTED TO ESTABLISH PROPERLY CLEARED SURFACES
WHILE AVOIDING COMPACTION PRIOR TO EXCAVATION ACTIVITY. FOLLOW HATCHING
DIAGRAMS. PHASE ONE FENCING TO BE DISMANTLED DAY OF CONSTRUCTION ONLY,
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF PROJECT ARBORIST.
3) SIGNAGE
R. Davies,CA#PN-6149A
a) ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD HAVE SIGNS SO THAT ALL CONTRACTORS
UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF THE FENCING. USE IMAGE PROVIDED FOR CREATING
LAMINATED/WEATHER PROTECTED SIGNS.
b) SIGNS SHOULD BE PLACED AS TO BE VISIBLE FROM ALL SIDES OF A TREE
PROTECTION AREA AND SPACED EVERY 75 FEET OR LESS.
4) MYCORRHIZAL TREATMENT
a) TREES# 7.1, 11.1. 11.2, 17.1, 19.1, 21.1 , 23.1 & 25 WILL BE TREATED WITH PLANT
HEALTH CARE. INC. 'TREE SAVER' PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. (FOLLOW
PRODUCT INSTRUCTIONS)
5) ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITHIN TPZ IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED
a) NO TRAFFIC SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE, NO VEHICLES
OR REPEATED FOOT TRAFFIC WITHOUT PRIOR NOTIFICATION
(TEMPORARY/EMERGENCY TRANSIT OF TPZ ACCOMPLISHED USING OPTIONS IN FIG. 3
DETAIL THIS SHEET,
b) NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOIL, CONSTRUCTION
MATERIAL. OR WASTE.
I) WASTE INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO CONCRETE WASHOUT, GASOLINE,
DIESEL, PAINT, CLEANERS, THINNERS, ETC.
c) WHERE CONSTRUCTION TRANSITS TPZ, COMPACTION IS CONDITIONAL - STRICTLY
LIMITED TO THE FOOTPRINT OF THE PRE-APPROVED CONSTRUCTION ELEMENT AND
ADHERING TO THE RECOMMENDED EXCAVATION AND ROOT PRUNING PROTOCOLS
6) TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM ANY CUTTING, SKINNING OR BREAKING OF
BRANCHES, TRUNKS OR ROOTS.
7) TREES WITHIN TPZ SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY IRRIGATION DURING EXTENDED DRY
WEATHER PERIODS WHEN ROOT/LIMB PRUNED OR WHEN GRADE CHANGES OR
COMPACTION OCCURS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO TPZ.
8) LANDSCAPING
a) REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES BY HAND CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH THE USE OF
MECHANICAL ADVANTAGES SUCH AS WEED WRENCHES, THAT DO NOT TURN SOIL.
b) 6" OF PRESCRIBED COURSE MULCH TO BE PLACED IN THE REMAINING ROOT ZONE
JUST PRIOR TO FENCE REMOVAL.
c) PRUNING SHOULD BE JUST PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF NEW TREES, SHRUBS AND
GROUNDCOVER.
d) ADHERE TO TRENCHING GUIDELINES WITHIN TPZ AND AVOID ROOTS AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE
e) DO NOT USE SOIL TURNING MACHINERY WITHIN TPZ.
9) NOTIFY PROJECT ARBORIST WHEN LAST OF TREE MANAGEMENT TASKS ARE COMPLETED.
RECOMMENDED EXCAVATION AND PRUNING PROTOCOLS WITHIN TPZ (AND IN NOTED
ADJACENT AREAS)
THIS TECHNIQUE TO BE APPLIED WHEN ROOTS REMAIN BUT SOIL IS REPLACED WITH
TOPSOIL OR COVER SOIL (OPEN ROOTING SUB-GRADE FOR PAVING). ABANDON USE OF
HEAVY MECHANIZED EXCAVATION TOOLS WHEN ROOTS LARGER THAN 1" IN DIAMETER
ARE INTERCEPTED. FURTHER EXCAVATION WILL USE HAND TOOLS THAT LEAN TOWARD
SPIKE, FORK AND PICK USE VS. BLADED OR EDGE TOOLS. ALTERNATELY, USE AN AIR- OR
HYDRO-SPADE.
1) DEFINE THE AREA WITHIN WHICH NO EXCAVATION OR COMPACTION OF SOIL SHOULD
OCCUR. [TREE PROTECTION ZONE (TPZ) THAT IS NOT IMPACTED BY APPROVED
CONSTRUCTION FEATURE]
2) WITH A SPADING FORK WORK THE TOP SOIL AND ROOT MATT ON THE SURFACE AWAY
FROM THE TREES AND TPZ. IDENTIFY ROOTS OF 1" OR GREATER IN DIAMETER AS SOON
3 •
•
R.Davies,CA#PN-61.49A
AS ENCOUNTERED AND OBSERVE GENERAL DIRECTION OF GROWTH. BE SURE TO LIMIT
FORK DEPTH TO MAX. DEPTH OF PLANTING/PAVING DETAILS FOR UNDISTURBED SOIL.
3) USING CLEAN SHARP BYPASS PRUNING SHEARS CUT BACK ALL ROOTS SMALLER THAN 1"
AT THE EXCAVATION LIMIT.
4) LARGER THAN 1" DIA. ROOTS TO BE PRUNED WITH CLEAN SHARP PULL SAW TO SINKING
ROOT OR NEXT BRANCHING THAT ENCOURAGES NEW GROWTH AWAY FROM NEW
•
CONSTRUCTION AND TOWARD BEST SOIL CONDITION AVAILABLE.
5) BROOM AWAY SOIL FROM THE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE WITH COURSE NARROW
BROOM, PRUNING UNDER SIZED ROOTS AS NECESSARY.
6) SLEEVES OR PIPING SHOULD BE PUSHED THROUGH TPZ WITH HYDRAULIC OR AIR
PRESSURE, NOT TRENCHED.
Tree Planting Specifications
j
PLANTING NOTES:
1)Existing areas proposed for new plant material shall be cleared and legally disposed unless noted otherwise.
2)All existing trees.plants,and roots outside of project improvement limits shall be protected from damage during any construction preparation,
removal or installation activities.
3)Replace.repair and restore disturbed landscape areas due to grading,trenching or other reasons to pre-construction condition and provide
material approved by the owner or owner's representative.
4)For tree,shrub.groundcover,and soil preparation,refer to notes and specifications.
51 All plant material shall be healthy nursery stock,well branched and rooted,full foliage,free from insects,diseases,weeds.weed rot,injuries
and defects and as specified in american standards for nursery stock,ANSI Z60.1.
6)All typical planting areas shall be covered by a layer of medium-grand fresh fir mulch to a depth of 2 inches.
7)Soil to be analyzed to ascertain ph,fertility,drainability,and viability of supporting vigorous plant growth.Any deficiencies in soil shall be
corrected by the contractor prior to installation of plant material.
8)Top soil:minimum 6'settled depth in all planting beds.Reuse surface soil stockpiled on site as available.Soil to be fertile,agricultural soil.
typical for locality,capable of sustaining vigorous plant growth,taken from drained site;free of subsoil,clay or impurities,plants,weeds,
concrete,rocks,boulders.and roots;minimum ph value of 5.4 and maximum of 7.0.Amend with organic composted yard debris tilled into topsoil.
Top soils to have minimum organic content of 10%
9)Soil amendment materials:
A.Fertilizer:containing fifty percent of the elements derived from organic sources;of proportion necessary to eliminate any deficiencies in topsoil.
as indicated in soils analysis.Approved brand meeting requirements of applicable State fertilizer laws.
I.Mycorrhizal application:mycroapply-endo/ecto.
Wil-gro 5-18-12.
B.Bone meal:raw.finely ground.commercial grade,minimum of 3 percent nitrogen and 20 percent phosphorus.
C.Lime.ground limestone,dolomitetype,minimum 95 percent carbonates.
D.Water:clean,fresh,and free of substances or matter which could inhibit vigorous growth of plants.
E.Organic compost:well-composted.stable and weed free organic matter,ph range of 5.5 to 7.5;moisture content of 35 to 55 percent by weight.
100 passing through inch sieve.Soluble salt content of 5 to 10 decisiemens/m:not exceeding 0.5 percent inert contaminants and free of
substances toxic to plants.
10)Soil preparation shall be reviewed and inspected prior to planting.Landscape architect to review soil preparation,amendment and plant material
prior to planting.
11)Provide landscape architect with plant order form within 30 days of contract award.Notify landscape architect immediately if any plants are
found to be unavailable.
12)The nursery source of trees along with one representative digital image shall be provided to the landscape architect at least two weeks before
the delivery of the trees to the site.The landscape architect may reject landscape plants that do not meet size or other planting specifications.
131 Venfy placement of trees near buildings with owner or landscape architect prior to planting.
141 Field conditions:
A.Do not install plant life when ambient temperatures may drop below 35 degrees for rise above 90 degrees f.
B.Do not install plant life when wind velocity exceeds 30 miles per hour.
C.Prepare planting beds properly by removing material not conductive to healthy plant growth.If hard packed conditions or debris from other
operations exists within plant beds,remove the debris.rock.cement treated base,trash,or other deleterious debns.
15)Provide 365 day warranty.replace dead or unhealthy plants.
16)Landscape contractor Shall contact project landscape architect for all site observations 72 hours prior to site visit.
17)Contractor to apply a pre-emergent blend to a clean,final landscape grade bed,prior to barkdust installation.Blend shall be 2 parts Pendulum
Aqua Cap to 1 part Simazine.Chemical mix and physical application to be per manufacturer's specifications.
4 •
R.Davies,CA#PN-6149A
Stand Preservation and Planting Specifications
Stands Si,S2&S3 are not impacted by development.No specifics on management are required.
Soil Characteristics and Specifications.
Primarily sandy barns with clay inclusions. Site has been commercially managed and irrigated for several
decades and exhibits no sign of growth limiting characteristics. Soil amendments for new shrub/herb/
turf will be typical of professional installations,with the above qualifications for minimizing root
disturbance
5 •
Inventory Tables
The following tables are broken into 1) Site level and 2) Parking level assessment. Site totals relate to the whole Development Impact Area
described on sheet UFP 1&3. Parking level totals relate to the area of parking within that DIA. Numbering of trees corrected and coordinated
with earlier submitted Tree Protection Plan. Infill numbers are expanded decimally to keep original designations.
1) Site Tree Canopy Table
EXISTING
Canopy Open Comments
Tree Canopy Heritage Cond. Preserv. Preserve
# Genus sp./Common Name DBH {ft2) over Site v. Tree Rating Rating Y/N? (see lettered
(ft ) Stand notes pg. 8)
1 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 10.6 44 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
2 Chamaecyparis obtusa 'Gracilis'/ 8.8 44 0 - 2 0 N A)0
Slender Hinoki
3 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 13.4 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
4 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 12.9 203 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
5 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 14.4 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
6 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 15.0 1134 0 - 3 0 N B), D) 1
7 Betula papyifera/Pa per Birch 15.3 804 0 - 2 2 N C) 1, D) 1
7.1 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 21.8 3019 2886 0 - 3 3 Y
8 Chamaecyparis obtusa 'Gracilis'/ 12.8 44 0 - 2 0 N A) 0
Slender Hinoki *
9 Prunus serulata'Kwanzan'/Kwansan 13.1 380 0 2 1 N E)3
Cherry
10 Prunus serulata'Kwanzan'/Kwansan 12.5 314 0 - 2 1 N E) 3
Cherry
11 Chamaecyparis obtusa 'Gracilis'/ 11.9 128 0 2 0 N A)0
Slender Hinoki
11.1 Sequoia gigantea/Giant Sequoia 42.8 962 956 0 - 3 3 Y
11.2 Acer palmatum/Japanese Maple 1 10.3 491 491 0 - 3 3 Y
Project Arborist: Ron Davies,CA#PN-6149A I Beighley&Assoc. Inc. 11284o NW Cornell Rd 97229 I 503 643 4796
City Planner: Sam Copelan,Assoc.Planner I City of Tigard 1503-718-2450 I >amuele i tj ard-or.guy
R.Davies,CA#PN-6149A
11.3 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 16.3 1256 1256 0 - 3 2 Y B)0
12 Styrax japonica/Japanese Styrax 7.5 314 0 - 3 3 N
13 Chamaecyparis obtusa 'Gracilis'/ 13.2 85 0 2 0 N A)0
Slender Hinoki
14 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 21.9 123 0 - 2 0 N A)0
15 Chamaecyparis obtusa 'Gracilis'/ 8.1 62 0 2 0 N A)0
Slender Hinoki
16 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 15.1 1139 0 - 3 2 N D) 1
17 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 11.9 570 0 - 2 2 N C)2, D)0
17.1 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 10.3 616 616 0 - 2 2 Y C) 1, D)0
18 Styrax japonica/Japanese Styrax* 10.8 307 0 - 3 2 N D)0
19 Cedrus lebani/Lebanon Cedar 18.4 707 0 - 2 0 N A) 2
19.1 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 13.5 1055 1055 0 - 3 2 Y C) 1, D)0
20 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 12.0 718 0 - 3 2 N
21 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 8.1 569 0 - 3 2 N
21.1 Prunus serulata'Kwanzan'/Kwansan 10.6 390 390 0 3 3 Y
Cherry
22 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 15.2 804 0 - 2 2 N
23 Chamaecyparis obtusa 'Gracilis'/ 9.5 44 O 2 0 N A)0
Slender Hinoki
23.1 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 23.0 2130 2130 0 - 3 3 Y
23.2 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 13.3 707 0 - 2 2 N
24 Chamaecyparis obtusa 'Gracilis'/ 12.3 44 0 2 0 N A)0
Slender Hinoki *
25 Prunus serulata 'Kwanzan'/Kwansan 8.1 221 221 0 2 2 Y
Cherry
25.1 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 18.0 66 0 - 2 0 N A)0
26 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 15.9 65 0 - 2 0 N A)0
27 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 15.8 65 0 - 2 0 N A)0
28 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar* 10.5 223 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
7•
R. Davies,CA#PN-6149A
29 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar* 9.7 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
30 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar* 14.5 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
31 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar * 10.5 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
32 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar* 12.3 344 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
33 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar * 12.0 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
34 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar* 6.0 71 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
35 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar * 9.3 184 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
36 Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar * 9.0 0 - 2 0 N A)0+1
37 Acer rubrum 'Bowhall'/Bowhall Red 13.0 531 265 0 3 3 Y
Maple
38 Populus tremuloides/Quaking 7.3 113 113 0 3 3 Y
Aspen
39 Populus tremuloides/Quaking 6.0 176 176 0 3 3 Y
Aspen
40 Tsuga heterophylla/Western 17.0 804 786 0 3 3 Y
Hemlock
41 Acer rubrum/ Red Maple 21.0 1332 469+ 0 - 1 1 Y B) 1
Acer platanoides 'Fairview'/
41.1 Fairview Norway Maple 12.8 380 0 0 3 2 Y w/i 25'of DIA
42 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 39.1 3019 2884 0 - 3 3 Y
43 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 27.9 3848 3473 0 - 3 3 Y
44 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 19.1 804 804+ 0 - 1 1 Y B) 1+2
45 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 22.4 1134 1134 0 - 1 2 Y 20%dead
crown
46 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 24.2 1409 1004 0 - 2 2 Y Utlty pruning
issues
47 Acer rubrum/ Red Maple 27.2 1175 952 0 - 2 2 Y Utlty pruning
issues
48 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 20.0 1175 965 0 2 2 Y
Utlty pruning
issues
49 Acer rubrum/ Red Maple 17.1 648 549+ 0 - 1 1 Y Utlty pruning
8 •
R.Davies,CA#PN-61.49A
issues, B) 1
50 Acer rubrum /Red Maple 20.4 1254 1045 0 - 2 2 Y Utlty pruning
issues
51 Quercus rubra/ Red Oak 33.1 4256 3431 0 - 3 3 Y
52 Quercus rubra/ Red Oak 23.8 1847 1832 0 - 3 3 Y Bole lean >15
deg
53 Quercus rubra/ Red Oak 27.0 2141 2141 0 - 3 3 Y
30202
+ INDICATES EXCLUDED BY CONDITION RATING
* Multi stemmed tree, calculated w/ Portland City measurement protocol: largest stem + 'A (all other stems > 1").
A) ANSI 300 8.7.3 standard violations, species is inappropriate for space. Current management unsustainable for health of
specimens. 0 - sheared, 1 -topped, 2 -too close to aerial obstruction
B) Bole decay. 0- associated w/ pruning, 1 - not associated w/ pruning, 2 -good reactive wood growth
C) Bronze Birch Borer, 1 -one or two visible gallery exits, 2 - staining of exterior bark, 3 - visible decay
D) Extensive branching ridge indicative of species, not confirmation of included bark. Rating of inclusion based on external
observation:0- inclusion not likely, 1 - inclusion likely
E) Root crown deformity. 1 -excessive surface roots, 2 -girdling, 3 - burl, 4- decay
1) Site Tree Canopy Table
PROPOSED
Tree Canopy Open Soil
# Genus sp./Common Name CALIPER/HT Canopy over Site Volume Comments
(ft2) (ft2) (ft3) n
A Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
B Cupressus nootkatensis'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
C Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku'/Coral Bark Maple 1.5" 315 315
D Cupressus nootkatensis'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
E Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku'/Coral Bark Maple 1.5" 315 315
9 •
R.Davies,CA#PN-61.49A
F Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
G Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
H Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
I Acer palmatum 'Fireglow'/Fireglow Japanese Maple 1.5" 177 177 2169
J Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
K Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku'/Coral Bark Maple 1.5" _ 315 315
L Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
M Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku'/Coral Bark Maple 1.5" 315 315
N Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku'/Coral Bark Maple 1.5" 315 315
O Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
P Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
O Acer circinatum/Vine Maple 6-7' Arboreal Bush
R Cupressus nootkatensis 'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
S Cupressus nootkatensis'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
T Cupressus nootkatensis'Green Arrow'/Green Arrow Cypress 7-8' 50 50
U Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku'/Coral Bark Maple 1.5" 315 315 3441
✓ Acer griseum/Paper Bark Maple 1.5" 491 479 8379
W Acer griseum/Paper Bark Maple 1.5" 491 284 5763
X Acer griseum/Paper Bark Maple 1.5" 491 341 3819
Y Acer griseum/Paper Bark Maple 1.5" 491 399 2757
Z Acer griseum/Paper Bark Maple 1.5" 491 392 2994
AA Acer griseum/Paper Bark Maple 1.5" 491 386 3345 1
4998
io •
R. Davies,CA#PN-6t4tA
1) Site Stand inventory
EXISTING
Genus sp./Common of Dominant Avg DBH 1 Avg Cond. Rating 1 Overall Canop
Stand Total
Stand# Genus sp./Common of 2nd Avg DBH 2 Avg Cond. Rating 2 Canopy y Comments
Pres. (ft2) Preser
Genus sp./Common of 3rd Avg DBH 3 Avg Cond. Rating 3 Rating ve (ft2)
Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 14.0 2
Small twig dieback is broad,
S1 Pseudotsuga menziesii/Douglas Fir 19.0 3 2 4351 4351 likely due to envir cond. Such
-
as truck exhaust
Pseudotsuga menziesii/Douglas Fir 25.5 3
S2 Quercus garryana/Or. White Oak 21.0 3 3 2237 2237 Alder overtopped.
Alnus rubra/Red Alder 7.5 2
Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 14.5 2
S3 2 630 630 A)1
I
7218
1) Site Effective Canopy Cover
Lot Lot DIA) 2x Canopy 2x Canopy 1.5x Canopy Mature 1.25 x Mature 1.25 x Mature Total Effective
# area (ft2) Area (ft2) of Area (ft2) of Area (ft2)of Canopy Area Canopy Area Canopy Area Canopy %Canopy
Preserved Preserved preserved (ft2)of Non- (ft2) of Native (ft2)of Area (ft2) (Canopy
Trees(>or= Stands(>or= Native trees Native Planted Trees Planted Area/Lot
pres. rating 2) pres. rating 2) (<6" DBH) Planted Trees Stands Area)
1 165161 60404 14436 X 4998 I X X 79838 48.3
11 •
R.Davies,CA#PN-6149A
2) Parking Tree Canopy Table
EXISTING
o Prese
Cano Canopy Open Heri rvati Prese Comments
Tree over Canopy Cond.
Genus sp./Common Name DBH py v. tage on rve (see lettered
over
(ft2) Pa(ft2) g Parking Stand Tree Rating Ratin YIN? notes pg. 12)
g
7.1 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 21.8 3019 1809 59.9 0 - 3 3 Y
11.1 Sequoia gigantea/Giant Sequoia 42.8 962 956 99.4 0 - 3 3 Y
11.3 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 16.3 1256 34(a) 0 0 - 3 2 Y B)0
17.1 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 10.3 616 146(a) 0 0 - 2 2 Y C) 1, D)0
19.1 Betula papyifera/Paper Birch 13.5 1055 335 (a) 0 0 - 3 2 Y C) 1, D)0
21.1 Prunus serulata'Kwanzan'/Kwansan 10.6 390 0(a) 0 0 3 3 Y
Cherry
23.1 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 23.0 2130 1903 89.3 0 - 3 3 Y
25 Prunus serulata'Kwanzan'/Kwansan 8.1 221 32 14.5 0 2 2 Y
Cherry
37 Acer rubrum 'Bowhall'/ Bowhall Red 13.0 531 265 49.9 0 3 3 Y
Maple _
41 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 21.0 1332 220+ 16.5 0 - 1 1 Y B) 1
41.1 Acer platanoides 'Fairview'/Fairview 12.8 390 0 0 0 - 3 2 Y w/i 25' of DIA
Norway Maple
42 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 39.1 3019 2485 82.3 0 - 3 3 Y
43 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 27.9 3848 3176 82.5 0 - 3 3 Y
44 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 19.1 804 535+ 66.5 0 - 1 1 Y B) 1+2
45 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 22.4 1134 942 83.1 0 - 1 2 Y 20%dead
crown
46 Acer rubrum /Red Maple 24.2 1409 944 67 0 - 2 2 Y Utlty pruning
issues
12 •
R. Davies,CA#PN-6i4yA
47 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 27.2 1175 855 72.8 0 - 2 2 Y Utlty pruning
issues
48 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 20.0 1175 933 79.4 0 - 2 2 Y Utlty pruning
issues
49 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 17.1 648 448+ 69.1 0 - 1 1 Y Utlty pruning
issues, B) 1
50 Acer rubrum/Red Maple 20.4 1254 1026 81.8 0 - 2 2 Y Utlty pruning
issues
51 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 33.1 4256 3431 80.6 0 - 3 3 Y
52 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 23.8 1847 1832 99.2 0 - 3 3 Y Bole lean >15
deg
53 Quercus rubra/Red Oak 27.0 2141 2141 100 0 - 3 3 Y
23933
+ INDICATES EXCLUDED BY CONDITION RATING
* Multi stemmed tree, calculated w/ Portland City measurement protocol: largest stem + %2 (all other stems > 1").
A) ANSI 300 8.7.3 standard violations, species is inappropriate for space. Current management unsustainable for health of
specimens. 0- sheared, 1 -topped, 2 -too close to aerial obstruction
B) Bole decay. 0 - associated w/ pruning, 1 - not associated w/ pruning, 2 -good reactive wood growth
C) Bronze Birch Borer, 1 -one or two visible gallery exits, 2 -staining of exterior bark, 3 -visible decay
D) Extensive branching ridge indicative of species, not confirmation of included bark. Rating of inclusion based on external
observation: 0 - inclusion not likely, 1 - inclusion likely
E) Root crown deformity. 1 - excessive surface roots, 2 -girdling, 3 - burl, 4—decay
�3 •
R.Davies,CA#PN-6149A
2) Parking Tree Canopy Table
PROPOSED
Canopy % Open Soil
Tree# Genus sp. /Common Name CALIPER Canopy over Canopy Volume Comments
/HT (ft2) Parking over (ft3) A
(ft2) Parking
I Acer palmatum 'Fireglow'/Fireglow Japanese Maple 2" 177 177 100 2169
U Acer palmatum 'Sango Kaku'/Coral Bark Maple 2" 315 315 100 3441
V Acer griseum/ Paper Bark Maple 2" 491 479 100 8379
W Acer griseum/Paper Bark Maple 2" 491 284 100 5763
X Acer griseum/ Paper Bark Maple 2" 491 322 65.6 3819
Y Acer griseum/ Paper Bark Maple 2" 491 321 65.6 2757
Z Acer griseum/ Paper Bark Maple 2" 491 333 67.4 2994
AA Acer griseum/ Paper Bark Maple 2" 491 384 78.2 3345
2615
2) Parking Stand inventory
EXISTING
Genus sp./Common of Dominant Avg DBH 1 Avg Cond. Rating 1 Overall Total Total Canopy
Stand
# Genus sp./Common of 2nd Avg DBH 2 Avg Cond. Rating 2 Stand Pres. Canopy Canopy over Preserve Comments
Genus sp./Common of 3rd Avg DBH 3 Avg Cond. Rating 3 Rating (ft2) Parking(ft2) (ft2)
Thuja plicata 'Hogan'/Hogan Cedar 14.0 2 Small twig dieback
S1 Pseudotsuga menziesii/Douglas Fir 19.0 3 2 4351 185 4351 is broad, likely due
to envir cond. Such
as truck exhaust
185.0
14 .
1_ •alA
TENANT IMPROVEMENT REri" �~ • S
fors•�[Z�
i
1 PACTRUST ''F OF `
PROJECT Y
% 1
�,`.,_ TENANT:
ENTRY AND SITE� w
‹` MODIFICATION OAD ;
r .•s r� T376 SW DURHAM PORTLAND,OR 92 24 6
s ` .�,�.. '�. � I I_. � I � � ,�._ � � � PROJECT NARRATNE _ il
y yyqq�� �i - YENI Ci FA6Taa,aiaTIIVB TING MAY TO
NEW
`ate I -- - r44E1p.14Yr0ef.,t� TVA
'xu,OlAiro eMEEMm.PI MEW aIX£9YBtE
3}3}
=
SITE Uri 0
Q EPLAN DEMO KEYED NOTE$-DEMO MORN INCLUOEO BUT PERFORMED UNDER REP.PERMIT
b 1.b{ T®EAa""a'°"""" (...la 7,7 LM€`"'""-AM raa I -.n AR
a,.. r z-INwvEEXMNO M.b.WTE mEexTwls.
. � 41D0-,.OSAII ETT j0CM :y.,IDTyEEaLDTW IIWROIXIMM.41A6 L.
i "�-*DoaTno4reusnu °�°14 q"E""sr�"F° TENANT INFORMATION
�� -.__ � ereeaL�veewccs
-__—
} r sr —_. I 9111LWN61NFORAIATION aawFwwv: els,
4•<. 'I GEEPSIGLT IiXiMiE0.V IDM,61 10IN
• '. ` j r � QrllN. 10.11OBW 6EglCMPIIW1AYl
I \
1 , I 4YMfRN1U p EYIM
y r--
- ' Iwl.r.30,PMMEI,
IWJIE# IFnN
i � � � Ynne aec uouo�,m
�_ i�II li I 1�j. e•wr.TYPE_ M
s
I
—_
Ra awn,wdn OFR 50 5E N Traar44RwLL' � r .R.Eda3 vePaueem
T'JYYI I ( I ` , I __. I I / f i / / I -TINnE urrtMrMEONNLEgM lIOF9 Cf NIFATTtl R;T.
I'
(g ,I nwME
4O4MEaF �IE-L
G• ro
-- r E SUYNARY _
! y�:ir' t .. -T. ! NEu,R1,eNiwwa+aRluL eeeae w,r+rP�.ovmm /�I� U
I I I i� I I ertllm mw:"r'ouneNENEa Twvwn..wl»a Y
i �y rR�r�� 4 MaCA`°.ANCII1xusGECVM=OE
i • lAI / �} • • • I•;ra AfTGq� 'E arTn4r o]oElabcl
/,(/ L_f P�PNNIINEIC MEctur Ct%FIW641 et a
a. O
/ , p , ZMr PI. EIECIRKA1CFC) �9<1
U.
/J/ 4 SITE PLAN-NEW Ma,.aRrl
�. O ioTa,N•�,b• / - ar,dRpp�E}ARV ERIC911:T 6i£C141VC W
KEYED NOTES-NEW ' -.+• -
0 raMCPwrrE anerou• A Z
..� Ib rtv1SIDm OUfli0 � I e Q
C11FW e'mxrRoE an. }
(i UWafJ1£NFAaFMf , a , .
a
a Pew emu's E-
v r me•me MI RCO)ORON We � `�ruwwvoaTeEaors¢aaTnLaBa 11
'^' NwNwrw•PwevlRa,w DATE:201
woe PERMITS
. AREVISION.
J
° o _._ �! AREA OF WORK 8.
:. !� ;/}'ate .I. 1 I1�II I . 4
E ._-c..4 ell QI^P 110
_ � ,
J TI , T_
LI
4 E.
--- DR AM.Rf:
BUILDING LOCATION n'"•• - .
LOCATION MAP Br- BUILDING PIJ,N s
A NOT TO WALE .. OSGLE r.w EOI4Ra�R'uK
Xr I, ' •RMyMDewEME¢ Z E1 AR4,
• «' " .xEa¢„ �� N5
I�; KEYED pD�S c
RRm MEw Ey,•� uwEroR h TMu OMS DM uc c.MODE vuue¢
., •`*e'.°"V¢I¢"" y �cDRxEm r uw.R Ef,"'VTR ION
r
• s M,,. ,.la, 9l F4
w�� w,N "OF OQ
4,+ - • wR w nun ISRM 'M DEcw
aPEIDE SSR 4r yAERE•• w —PMft ( b+Al 'FO1E PROJECT N iB4B(
Liar (, e R°s'M.",-..fan .oMM ^ l -... zoc�RAx EA IrvMou¢Ar
• as�M,y, �Ew IIIs�1 IIP aPEMRIwc19.1r MG, Q
�J-. LOBO rxz Rcw.4 y,p�mRnn,aMw¢wxR Tnpw 4,arl=xi Q
^O1rt Aq�RpMpycwT6SCREERwM. EM¢\L� 'TAU
D, , KWpx. HALM AE TEE EmsOs w"'s -..> 2
IerimsLT ",g RIM sotam.IMwAUTM¢E p�eR S S.'a-, di+"' Q
tvDF,l(y F ?
#� FLOOR DEMO sloe vlEw, xE c,uPAcreD are cwwE >_
PLAN
s `�— �-- > QFLOOR PLAN NEW SECTION O
r %IMICDNCRp1EMryGl9.D,./FE.D j Q
ARAMENYP TE CEEFIwm AS
R 2}i
i NAGIEDIEI&. ,
e
• ID'--ryMl Sw¢ERIKpBG1MIIJ /..
' OR EOY,o yC'1' O M NY
ram_�^-.a+.�. .,.._ CORR,<ER ` Eig 7
S 1'� I----. 411111 tilt - INIilillir ¢MDinw 'ji'•• n �5?a§? i e 052E,EiEi s
= nwMwmRp 8 m
OUEI�'pp�ME[D RTIYKD
� �l CH E A
'.P..A w.cs''DA SITES WALK
e�
�— ¢¢t'1E,4flW¢u9E '�—
_......_.. �� �i 1 x¢xNxwEMIL 51uD591E' 'r'EDDI.EE..1N1® C
DC.,amnn+evTL ¢tl,YI.IIII
... NFAiRfPEx,uER , --.. TNA EMmA mcr.v.
CLI¢AfRNM rornETEaTss
E R OAIJNE. SE-MeRYD OCFFR ROD ,•"'EM1 ..MIEU _
MOM ERMA
NEENN'm METAL w.LLC4rt1 ¢EMFn UnMO¢TtlREKxE /- F\
�1M PEEP MATCH w41 I�I loRRI
EMIR-COLOR EEO¢E1NCEw SYSsist¢IClFERCIIEwI1M' _ ♦\
MOORS Nq g,01EnKNE aTMPFYMIM1O15YIggEDx.J /l• \
SYSTEM MD O,y'(OO C
CLOSURE.w r.SEmois MO•
A
NAER RDu
®DETAIL AT NEW ENTRY , y F
•
aCCs. wiRBRD 1E¢M DO
,MMAOIDNNIM.O Me SY In
y1•
•
RTMPABI R EIrA a
n@RIMI•R RE,UN 4S *. - _.J Iq`M'NMEIFiFKQML[
ELsi4EE1AYl6 MMIRE,MFTh EMS MARL
IOMERxR4 L
COUPE STRIP rYmIM.0 y,l r
w,rvW-.v Rue ton,awirxt) 1 >4TF�FMM MR,PtmVp n I.
y 1. � • /
Q
ream AnuwD
RNA,
Y••• ¢fM\fMD OGMIRm ll'MOOSLOR MR CLOSURE
Isece ERE
♦ ��� 1 y q _
XR
�vsrovsnowT rm¢RmWE E -C
MDIEDRd� 1, f ' IIRfREEOlf IRO WE
.2
¢5•LWEAIID OCM91RW I ' SOmei MIMIRRI U LDO
wl�oow'sn,YDmoRE,RMRE I I • _ -11 i'_PI! Z It;
1 U=' V Ti S
Q E
®DETAIL AT NEW ENTRY > m gbh SITE STAIR U N co
'W L'
IL Va
Cl) In
mlwElE MEMO( DATE.2019-12-C
'i uoarrMn,gNEIEMr I;yy��`. D JCRs AT saa PERMITBID SE
TO ERODED waAPART REVISION
PCRIIMDCEwRr. 431.
�CCNC pampa,
x.
mEORE¢NaE MIR, 2
9?:'. J.
Mwp 4.NED EAU COuRsE FAWNED
• + a, oo sm SPEC SOIL OT 5.
Mao 0
13
WIVE larrOSILL CO¢TOCNRK Ell_
0.'v::.. NP.0 KNOWN
K TI SME MCUIFlE,
O•
PRO .IM\MN ORE BMOCs OMR ,RAMN,Y:
MOTE. M1RD T-IN IAPTHDIE51l INSURABLE
E
ECEMME MINElMip¢481wLL BE
w M' Nt OaIRNINE.]CAMMIS MR REPLACES.
i.: SWAMP N RE PREPARED
NEIR MEWIMJECi.��.. � NroMlMEYEACM VMI$
DESCRIPTION OF MINOR MODIFICATION
/ SW 72ND AVENUE _ ADDRESS: 7376 SW DURHAM ROAD
^r—w�1 bnnnnunnnuimlr F
" TIGARD, OR 97224
A L � �'�'� � TAX LOT: TIGAR B01400
QMI T
C h�" 11 Q THE CURRENT USE IS OFFICE. B OCCUPANCY AND STORAGE, S-1 OCCUPANCY. USE TO
ONHIb D♦NHNHO lir / 1.\\ "He -4T, JI- I ��� REMAIN THE SAME.
�1 THE INTENT OF THIS MINOR MODIFICATION IS AS FOLLOWS
I ' I • THE PURPOSE OF THE ADDED SIDEWALK 15 TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE WAY TO THE
�� SUITE ENTRY DOOR. THIS NEW HARDSCAPE IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TIGARD
— I DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18.420.010 SECTION A, SUBSECTIONS 1 AND 2,TO
® n.numm
Q ENHANCE THE ECONOMIC VALUE AND TO CREATE HELP UNIFY NEW DEVELOPMENT WITH
O ' �� L� �� EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS AND CREATE A MORE PLEASANT COMMUNITY CHARACTER.
o H I J M N , _ �1`P g L� \C AS WELL AS REQ'S IN TABLE 18.420.1 ROWS L-1 AND L-2.
�• "' "' I - L Q`� I • TO RENOVATE A BUILDING ENTRANCE FOR A NEW SPACE THAT WILL BE CREATED WITH
° °o J 5J� THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DEMISING WALL.
\ r • REPLACE EXISTING EXTERIOR STAIRS WITH NEW STAIRS AND RAILINGS
' • CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK FROM THE ENTRY TO THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN
`�, ' itiuuuw i 7324
J PATH AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING
NN) . N
II
IV 198Bid I LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATIONS
7340 TOTAL LOT AREA 5.38 Acres-234,352.8 SF
PARK MAP
e EXISTING PROPOSED/MODIFIED
z 3
LANDSCAPE AREA 59,981.82 SF 60,138.57 SF
(AREAS INCLUDED IN HATCH CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWN SHADED ON THE SITE DRAWING.)
7376
REFER TO ATTACHED • EXISTING LANDSCAPE:
DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE AREA: 57,339.15 SF
AREA SPECIFIC '� LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE 24.47%
\ d N. 7374
WORK. i EXISTING HARDSCAPE AREA: 2,642.67 SF
\ pbc197 HARDSCAPE PERCENTAGE 1.12%
LOCATION OF VAN Bldg - IACCESSIBLE \ -) 7370 TOTAL AREA: 25.59%
PARKING STALL.
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA:
LANDSCAPE AREA: 56,705.4 SF
LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE: 24.20%
PROPOSED HARDSCAPE AREA: 3,433.17 SF
o� Ilk d VA
Sli HARDSCAPE PERCENTAGE: 1.47%
Ito TOTAL AREA: 25.67%
O
THE PERCENTAGE OF HARDSCAPE INCLUDED IN THE LANDSCAPING IS BELOW
2c<`S'..c /f THE 50% MAXIMUM AND CAN THEREFORE BE INCLUDED IN OVERALL SITE
.P,p LANDSCAPING COVERAGE PER L-2 STANDARD IN TABLE 18.420.1.
O
I
,,\
PARCEL IV MAP
z
SCALE 1" = 100'
MINOR MOD
PACTRUST BUSINESS CENTER PACTRUST
PARCEL IV
PORTLAND, OR 97224
01/30/20
f
PARKING ANALYSIS 1 PARKING CALCULATIONS
7374 - VACANT
BUILDING G Description of use EXISTING MODIFIED REQ'D
PARKING STALLS 202 200 145
Vacancy space- Previous use was an Environmental study company.Small Office ACCESSIBLE STALLS 2 4 6
space (Office-4,433sf) with Warehouse space for storing field equipment and VAN STALLS 1
7352 - TAX SERVICES, INC materials testing. (Industrial Service -4,015sf). PARKING HAS BEEN AFFECTED BASED ON THIS ALTERATION. (2)
PrimaryUse Area Min/1,000sf Req. ParkingACCESSIBLE SPOTS HAVE BEEN ADDED (1 VAN ACCESSIBLE AND 1
Description of use REGULAR ACCESSIBLE.) (2) SPOTS HAVE BEEN REMOVED TO
General Tax services. Office 8,448 2.7 22.81 ACCOMMODATE THE NEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING AS WELL AS THE ISLAND
General Office use Total 8,448 22.81 ADDED AT REBUILT CONCRETE WALK.
PARKING MODIFICATION AND ACCESSIBLE STALL ADDITION WORK IS
Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req. Parking BEING DONE TO BRING THE SITE CLOSER TO COMPLIANCE.WORK IS NOT
Office 3,030 2.7 8.18 BEING DONE FOR A SPECIFIC TENANT, BUT IN CONJUNCTION FOR A SPEC
Total 3,030 8.18 7376 - VACANT VACANCY. THE SPACE THAT IS BEING MODIFIED IS A VACANCY SPACE.
Description of use NEW ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO HAVE APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE AND
General Office space (Office- 12,463sf). STRIPING.
7358 - CORAM ALTERNATE SITE SERVICES
Description of use Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req. Parking
Wholesale pharmacy and infusion center. Pharmaceuticals (Light Industrial 2,693 Office 12,463 2.7 33.65
sf) and Medical (Office 7,271sf). Total 12,463 33.65 BUILDING H
i
Primary Use Area Min/ 1,000 sf Req. Parking
Medical (Office) 9,964 2.7 26.90 Total Required Parking Spaces 104.87 7324 - PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS INC
Total 9,964 26.90
Description of use
Installs and maintains Fire Alarm systems. Office (7,691sf) and Storage for
7370 - DISH NETWORK SERVICE products (Industrial Services- 11,102sf).
Description of use Primary Use Area Min/1,000sf Req. Parking
,Installation and service for satellite TV systems (Industrial Service and 'Industrial Services 18,793 0.8 15.03
Equipment Rental). Office (4,857sf)and Industrial Services(11,805 sf) Total 18,793 15.03
IPrimaryUse Area Min/1,000sf Req. Parking
Industrial Services 16,662 0.8 13.33
1 Total 16,662 13.33 7340 - VACANT
1
Description of use
General office and warehouse. Previous Tenant designed, made and distributed
audio equipment for aviation clients. Office (5,386sf) -General Industrial
(10,049 sf)
Primary Use Area Min/ 1,000 sf Req. Parking
General Industrial 15,435 1.6 24.70
Total 15,435 24.70
Total Required Parking Spaces 39.73
MINOR MOD
PACTRUST BUSINESS CENTER PACTRUST
PARCEL IV
PORTLAND, OR 97224 01/30/20
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
JAN 2 2 2020
DATE: January 22, 2020 CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING/ENGINEERING
TO: Samuel Copelan, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard Building Department
FROM: Mike Wireman-Nothwang, Architect
Pacific Realty Associates, LP.
SUBJECT: pbc197 Wood Vacancy—Completeness Review Response
M M D2019-00032
1. Narrative
• For the removal of 27 trees, you will need to respond to the applicable code criteria in
18.420.020. A tree removal permit will be required in accordance with CDC
18.420.030.H.
o See attached Landscape Plans
2. Urban Forestry Plan:
• Your landscape plan shows that 27 trees are being removed and 21 trees are being
replaced. We will need an Urban Forestry Plan in accordance with CDC 18.420.060
to show that the canopy standards are still being met.
o We will replace all 27 trees as shown on the attached Landscape plans
• All trees to be removed on this site will need either a simple tree removal or a
complex tree removal.
• Urban Forestry Plan needs to meet all of the standards in 18.420.020.
c See attached Landscape Plans
3. Parking Plan
• Indicate the one (1) proposed van accessible parking space shown in the parking
plan —See attached plans
o If striping changes are proposed, then include what changes are being made
in your narrative—Striping will be added for the two new ADA parking stalls
4. Parking Plan Spreadsheet
• Please provide us with detailed information on the current tenant and previous tenant
for the following addresses on SW Durham. More information is required because we
either do not have tenant information in our system or we need to determine the use
of the most recent tenant.
O 7358—Coram Alternate Site Services — Reference Tigard permit#BUP2008-
00368. Wholesale pharmacy and infusion center. Pharmaceuticals (Light
Industrial) and Medical (Office).
O 7370 —Dish Network Service— Reference Tigard permit#BUP2014-00103.
Installation and service for satellite TV systems (Industrial Service and
Equipment Rental).
O 7324 — Performance Systems Integration— Reference Tigard permit
#BUP2006-10029. Installation and service for fire alarms, low voltage
systems, and fire extinguishers (Industrial Services).
pbc197 Wood Vacancy-Tenant Information Narrative
MMD2019-00032
Parking Analysis
BUILDING G
7352-TAX SERVICES,INC
Description of use
General Tax services
General Office use(3,030 sf)
Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req. Parking
Office 3,030 2.7 8.18
Total 3,030 8.18
7358-CORAM ALTERNATE SITE SERVICES
Description of use
Wholesale pharmacy and infusion center.Pharmaceuticals-Light Industrial(2,693 sf)and Medical Office
(7,271 sf)
Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req.Parking
Medical(Office) 9,964 2.7 26.90
Total 9,964 26.90
7370-DISH NETWORK SERVICE
Description of use
Installation and service for satellite TV systems.Industrial Service and Equipment Rental.Office(4,857 sf)and
Industrial Services(11,805 sf)
Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req.Parking
Industrial Services 16,662 0.8 13.33
Total 16,662 13.33
7374-VACANT
Description of use
Vacancy space-Previous use was an Environmental study company.Small Office space(4,433 sf)with
Warehouse space for storing field equipment and materials testing-Industrial Service(4,015 sf)
Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req.Parking
Office 8,448 2.7 22.81
Total 8,448 22.81
7376-VACANT
Description of use
General Office Use(12,463 sf)
Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req.Parking
Office 12,463 2.7 33.65
Total 12,463 33.65
Total Required Parking Spaces 104.87
•
BUILDING H
7324-PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS INC
Description of use
Installs and maintains Fire Alarm systems.Office(7,691 sf)and Storage for products-Industrial Services
(11,102 sf)
Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req.Parking
Industrial Services 18,793 0.8 15.03
Total 18,793 15.03
7340-VACANT
Description of use
General office and warehouse.Previous Tenant designed,made and distributed audio equipment for aviation
clients.Office(5,386 sf)and General Industrial(10,049 sf)
Primary Use Area Min/1,000 sf Req.Parking
General Industrial 15,435 1.6 24.70
Total 15,435 24.70
Total Required Parking Spaces 39.73
• RECEIVED
JAN 072020
MEMORANDUM PLA TY OF TIGARD
NCI NG/ENGINE RING
DATE: January 7, 2020
TO: Samuel Copelan, Assistant Planner
City of Tigard Building Department
FROM: Mike Wireman-Nothwang, Architect
Pacific Realty Associates, LP.
SUBJECT: pbc197 Wood Vacancy—Completeness Review Response
M M D2019-00032
1. arrive
(j'• 7374 SW Durham Road is mentioned in the narrative and is not an active address.
Please confirm if the tenant improvement is for 7374 SW Durham Road or if this is
for 7376 SW Durham Road
o We are in the process of creating an address of 7374 SW Durham Road. The
application was sent to Oscar on 1/6/2020.
2. Lanccaping Plan
0 • Please include an updated number for the existing landscaping area and the
proposed landscaping area
o The current plan shows that there is an increase in landscaped area after the
improvements, even though approximately 674.5 square feet of landscaping
is being removed w no proposed replacement.
• If proposin0
g new landscapingith, please state how the landscaping standard will meet
the L-2 standard of Table 18.420.1
o There is new landscaping being added in the parking lot planter/walkway.
Also, based on calculations shown on drawing, the hardscape is under the
50% limit for landscaping and has therefore been included in the total
/ landscape area.
Please confirm that no trees are being removed
o Per attached landscape plans, there are trees being removed, others
protected and some new.
3. ite an
l�� - Indicate that all proposed accessible parking stalls will have appropriatesignage
o Note has been added to Minor Mod Documentation. Signage will be added to
the Construction Documents as well.
4. /h7e of Use Parking Plan
If this work is for a new tenant, please state the name of the tenant
o This work is related to a spec vacancy project. We do not have a proposed
/� tenant at this time.
V1 Include the total number of total parking stalls on this tax lot, and include the total
number of accessible parking stalls and van accessible parking stalls
o Parking Calculations have been shown. The overall site is non-compliant with
regards to Accessible Parking and this landscape revision will get the parcel
closer to being compliant. There are plans in the future to add additional
Accessible stalls to bring the Parcel into compliance.
• Using the Change of Use Parking Count Template, please fill out the first three
columns to include address, tenant, and business type for all tenants onsite.
a A chart similar to the Change if Use Parking Count Template has been
provided as part of this minor mod.
,
DESCRIPTION OF MINOR MODIFICATION RECEIVED
SW 72ND AVENUE ADDRESS: 7376 SW DURHAM ROAD JAN 0 7 2020
— F mmmmmmmNmmr
uni,. mm nlinun / n m" TIGARD, OR 97224
/ ° + — ` � ,�. TAX LOT: 2S113AB01400
CITY OF TIGARD
A 1 PLANNING/ENGINEERING
I I I r�1i� s/ � Q THE CURRENT USE IS OFFICE. B OCCUPANCY AND STORAGE, S-1 OCCUPANCY. USE TO
\ç
-0 _ _ ; nnmID 11 j• REMAIN THE SAME.
MI NM �. II 1� . � THE INTENT OF THIS MINOR MODIFICATION IS AS FOLLOWS
• THE PURPOSE OF THE ADDED SIDEWALK IS TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE WAY TO THE
E z�� J •am' - I I SUITE ENTRY DOOR. THIS NEW HARDSCAPE IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TIGARD
� •_ _ r DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 18.420.010 SECTION A, SUBSECTIONS 1 AND 2, TO
��• ENHANCE THE ECONOMIC VALUE AND TO CREATE HELP UNIFY NEW DEVELOPMENT WITH
_ 0 ' 3' EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS AND CREATE A MORE PLEASANT COMMUNITY CHARACTER.
H I J M _ AS WELL AS REQ'S IN TABLE 18.420.1 ROWS L-1 AND L-2.
`� m ,,, I _ - N L  �J� • TO RENOVATE A BUILDING ENTRANCE FOR A NEW SPACE THAT WILL BE CREATED WITH
o ,� R _ __J � THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DEMISING WALL.
.. , r • REPLACE EXISTING EXTERIOR STAIRS WITH NEW STAIRS AND RAILINGS
a I
s _ • CONSTRUCT AN ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK FROM THE ENTRY TO THE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN
NNNNN \ �.. I ,,,^° I 7324 PATH AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING
. II I --- - ,� p. 198
IV mm; H i LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATIONS' �� 7340 TOTAL LOT AREA 5.38 Acres-234,352.8 SF
\ 414'\ EXISTING PROPOSED I MODIFIED
PARK MAP
zl�/ LANDSCAPE AREA 59,981.82 SF 60,138.57 SF
(AREAS INCLUDED IN HATCH CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWN SHADED ON THE SITE DRAWING.)
REFER TO ATTACHED ,� 7376 LANDSCAPE EXISTING NDSCAREAAPE. 57,339.15 SF
DRAWINGS FOR \ 1 LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE 24.47%
AREA SPECIFIC a�7 \ 7374
WORK. I EXISTING HARDSCAPE AREA: 2,642.67 SF
\ \
\ \ pbc197 IIII HARDSCAPE PERCENTAGE 1.12%
Bldg. L
\ 7370\ ' TOTAL AREA: 25.59%
\
-.. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA:
J w' LANDSCAPE AREA: 56,705.4 SF
7358 LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE: 24.20%
%- y I PROPOSED HARDSCAPE AREA 3,433.17 SF
GAA HARDSCAPE PERCENTAGE: 1.47%
F� 4
1900
TOTAL AREA: 25.67%
O
0' THE PERCENTAGE OF HARDSCAPE INCLUDED IN THE LANDSCAPING IS BELOW
S' THE 50% MAXIMUM AND CAN THEREFORE BE INCLUDED IN OVERALL SITE
A�,p LANDSCAPING COVERAGE PER L-2 STANDARD IN TABLE 18.420.1.
\ 1LJ I I :---
N _ 11�
PARCEL IV MAP Z-
SCALE 1" = 100'
MINOR MOD
PACTRUST BUSINESS CENTER PACTRUST
PARCEL IV
PORTLAND, OR 97224 01/6/20
•
RECEIVED
JAN 0 7 2020
CITY OF TIGARD
PLANNING/ENGINEERING
PARKING CALCULATIONS (PER TABLE 18.410.3 OF THE TIGARD DEVELOPMENT CODE)
OFFICE PARKING RATIO-2.7/1000SF WAREHOUSE PARKING RATIO-.5/1000 SF
BLDG TENANT TENANT OFFICE I WHSE OFFICE WAREHOUSE PARKING
# #. NAME SIZE (SF) SIZE (SF) PARKING REQ'D PARKING REQ'D REQ'd
G
7352 DI TAX SERVICES, INC 3,030 - (3,030/ 1000)x 2.7=8.18 - 8.18
7358 0 CORAM ALTERNATE SITE SERVICES 7,271 9,964 (7,271/1000)x 2.7= 19.63 (9,964/ 1000)x .5=4.98 24.61
7370 0 DISH NETWORK SERVICE 4,857 11,805 (4,857/ 1000)x 2.7= 13.11 (11,805/ 1000)x.5=5.90 19.01
7374 Q VACANT 4,433 4,015 (4,433/ 1000)x 2.7= 11.97 (9,985/ 1000)x.5=5 16.97
7376 0 VACANT 12,463 - (12,463/ 1000)x 2.7=33.65 - 33.65
102.42 req'd
H
- 7340 VACANT 5,386 10,049 (5,386/ 1000)x 2.7= 14.54 (10,049/1000)x.5=5.02 19.56
- 7324 0 FIDELITONE 7,691 11,102 (7,691 / 1000)x 2.7=20.76 (11,102/ 1000)x .5=5.55 26.31
45.87 req'd
PARKING CALCULATIONS TOTAL REQUIRED 148.29
EXISTING MODIFIED REQ'D TOTAL PROVIDED 200
PARKING STALLS 202 200
ACCESSIBLE STALLS 2 4 6
VAN STALLS 1
PARKING HAS BEEN AFFECTED BASED ON THIS ALTERATION. (2)ACCESSIBLE SPOTS
HAVE BEEN ADDED. (2)SPOTS HAVE BEEN REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEW
ACCESSIBLE PARKING AS WELL AS THE ISLAND ADDED AT REBUILT CONCRETE WALK.
PARKING MODIFICATION AND ACCESSIBLE STALL ADDITION WORK IS BEING DONE TO
BRING THE SITE CLOSER TO COMPLIANCE.WORK IS NOT BEING DONE FOR A
SPECIFIC TENANT, BUT IN CONJUNCTION FOR A SPEC VACANCY.THE SPACE THAT IS
BEING MODIFIED IS A VACANCY SPACE.
NEW ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO HAVE APPROPRIATE SIGNAGE.
MINOR MOD
PACTRUST BUSINESS CENTER PACTRUST
PARCEL IV
PORTLAND, OR 97224 01/6/20
CORRESPONDENCE
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
r' C
TIGARD
City of Tigard
January 27,2020
Pacific Realty Associates,L.P.
Attn:Robert Bumcrot
15350 SW Sequoia Parkway,Suite 300
Portland,OR 97224
Project: Wood Vacancy
Site: 7376 SW Durham Road;WCTM 2S113AB,Tax Lot 1400
Land Use File: MMD2019-00032
Dear Mr. Bumcrot:
The City received the above referenced application on December 12th,2019. Staff has evaluated your
application for completeness against Tigard's submittal requirements and determined that additional
information is required.
I. Completeness Items
In order for your application to be deemed complete,please submit the following items:
1. Urban Forestry Plan
• For the removal of multiple development trees,you will need to submit an Urban
Forestry Plan that meets all of the requirements of CDC 18.420.060 to show that the
canopy standards are still being met.
i. We need to see that the removal and replacement of the trees will not
generate a canopy change less than what you currently have on site.
• All trees to be removed on this site will need either a simple tree removal or a
complex tree removal.
2. Parking Plan spreadsheet
• After the most recent submittal,Planning needs more information for all tenants
onsite regarding use category. For example:X Tenant assembles radios from
preconstructed parts. Final products are shipped to offsite locations for sale.The
office area is 200 square feet,warehouse is 200 square feet,and production area is
400 square feet.
• Planning can determine the use category if you give us a detailed description of all
activities that occur on site and a floor plan with square footages. For all currently
vacant suites,please give us the information for the most recent tenant.
3. Parking Plan
• Please identify on the plan where the van accessible parking stall is located
i. Not shown on the 1-22-2019 resubmittal.
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov
Determination of Completeness Page 2
Land Use File MMD2019-00032
More information is required because we either do not have tenant information in our system or we
need to determine the use of the most recent tenant.
II. Completeness Options
This letter contains the completeness review from all relevant City Departments. Please be advised
that no further action will be taken on your application until one of the following events occurs: (1)
you submit all completeness items, (2) you submit some completeness items and request that the City
deem your application complete, or (3) you submit no completeness items and request that the City
deem your application complete. Once your application is deemed complete, staff will review your
application for approvability.
III. When Your Application Becomes Void
Per ORS 227.178, your application will be void if one of the three actions listed above is not taken
within 180 days of the date you submitted your application.The date on which your application would
become void is June 9th, 2020. Please be aware that application fees are non-refundable. If an
application becomes void,the City may retain some or all of the related application deposits.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2450 or
SamuelC( itigard-or.gov.
Sincerely,
ledrev ceipbm_
Samuel Copelan
Assistant Planner
14GARD
City of Tigard
January 15,2020
Pacific Realty Associates,L.P.
Attn: Robert Bumcrot
15350 SW Sequoia Parkway,Suite 300
Portland,OR 97224
Project: Wood Vacancy
Site: 7376 SW Durham Road;WCTM 2S113AB,Tax Lot 1400
Land Use File: MMD2019-00032
Dear Mr.Bumcrot:
The City received the above referenced application on December 12th,2019. Staff has evaluated your
application for completeness against Tigard's submittal requirements and determined that additional
information is required.
I. Completeness Items
In order for your application to be deemed complete,please submit the following items:
1. Narrative
• For the removal of 27 trees,you will need to respond to the applicable code criteria
in 18.420.020.A tree removal permit will be required in accordance with CDC
18.420.030.H.
2. Urban Forestry Plan
• Your landscape plan shows that 27 trees are being removed and 21 trees are being
replaced.We will need an Urban Forestry Plan in accordance with CDC 18.420.060
to show that the canopy standards are still being met.
• All trees to be removed on this site will need either a simple tree removal or a
complex tree removal.
• Urban Forestry Plan needs to meet all of the standards in 18.420.020.
3. Parking Plan
• Indicate the one (1) proposed van accessible parking space shown in the parking plan
i. If striping changes are proposed,then include what changes are being made
in your narrative
4. Parking Plan spreadsheet
• Please provide us with detailed information on the current tenant and previous
tenant for the following addresses on SW Durham:
i. 7358
a. 7370
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov
Determination of Completeness Page 2
Land Use File MMD2019-00032
iii. 7324
• More information is required because we either do not have tenant information in
our system or we need to determine the use of the most recent tenant.
II. Completeness Options
This letter contains the completeness review from all relevant City Departments. Please be advised
that no further action will be taken on your application until one of the following events occurs: (1)
you submit all completeness items, (2)you submit some completeness items and request that the City
deem your application complete, or (3) you submit no completeness items and request that the City
deem your application complete. Once your application is deemed complete, staff will review your
application for approvability.
III. When Your Application Becomes Void
Per ORS 227.178, your application will be void if one of the three actions listed above is not taken
within 180 days of the date you submitted your application.The date on which your application would
become void is June 9`s, 2020. Please be aware that application fees are non-refundable. If an
application becomes void,the City may retain some or all of the related application deposits.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2450 or
SamuelCa,,tigard-or.gov.
Sincerely,
Samuel Copelan
Assistant Planner
•
TIGARD
City of Tigard
December 23`s,2019
Pacific Realty Associates,L.P.
Attn:Robert Bumcrot
15350 SW Sequoia Parkway,Suite 300
Portland,OR 97224
Project: Wood Vacancy
Site: 7376 SW Durham Road;WCTM 2S113AB, Tax Lot 1400
Land Use File: MMD2019-00032
Dear Mr.Bumcrot:
The City received the above referenced application on December 12th,2019. Staff has evaluated your
application for completeness against Tigard's submittal requirements and determined that additional
information is required.
I. Completeness Items
In order for your application to be deemed complete,please submit the following items:
1. Narrative
• 7374 SW Durham Road is mentioned in the narrative and is not an active address.
Please confirm if the tenant improvement is for 7374 SW Durham Road or if this is
for 7376 SW Durham Road.
• If you would like to create a new address for 7374 SW Durham Road,please
complete and submit an Address and Commercial Suite Application,which can be found
on the "Forms" section of the City of Tigard webpage.
2. Landscape Plan
• Please include an updated number for the existing landscaping area and the proposed
landscaping area
i. The current plan shows that there is an increase in landscaped area after the
improvements,even though approximately 674.5 square feet of landscaping
is being removed with no proposed replacement.
• If proposing new landscaping,please state how the landscaping standard will meet
the L-2 standard of Table 18.420.1
• Please confirm that no trees are being removed
3. Site Plan
• Indicate that all proposed accessible parking stalls will have appropriate signage
13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171
TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov
Determination of Completeness Page 2
Land Use File MMD2019-00032
4. Change of Use Parking Plan
• If this work is for a new tenant,please state the name of the tenant
• Include the total number of total parking stalls on this tax lot,and include the total
number of accessible parking stalls and van accessible parking stalls
• Using the Change of Use Parking Count Template, please fill out the first three columns
to include address,tenant,and business type for all tenants onsite.
II. Completeness Options
This letter contains the completeness review from all relevant City Departments. Please be advised
that no further action will be taken on your application until one of the following events occurs: (1)
you submit all completeness items, (2)you submit some completeness items and request that the City
deem your application complete, or (3) you submit no completeness items and request that the City
deem your application complete. Once your application is deemed complete, staff will review your
application for approvability.
III. When Your Application Becomes Void
Per ORS 227.178, your application will be void if one of the three actions listed above is not taken
within 180 days of the date you submitted your application.The date on which your application would
become void is June 9`s, 2020. Please be aware that application fees are non-refundable. If an
application becomes void,the City may retain some or all of the related application deposits.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2450 or
SamuelCOtigard-or.gov.
Sincerely,
1"Q't C5PJMI—
Samuel Copelan
Assistant Planner