The URL can be used to link to this page

SLR2012-00003 (3) ! 40 NOTICE OF TYPE II DECISION 1111 JACK PARK TRAIL & TVF&R PARKING MODIFICATION TIGARD 120 DAYS = 3/13/2013 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: JACK PARK TRAIL & TVF&R PARKING MODIFICATION CASE NOS.: Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2012-00003 Minor Modification (MMD) MMD2012-00021 Tree Removal Permit TRE2012-00026 Sign Permit SGN2012-00156 PROPOSAL: The Applicant seeks approval to develop an unimproved section of Jack Park and TVF&R Fire Station 50. The project includes Sensitive Lands Review for the development of an ADA accessible trail, including an engineered bridge span across Krueger Creek, to connect the existing park area to the existing community room and parking lot at the fire station; a minor modification to the TVF&R Fire Station 50 Conditional Use Permit to remove one parking stall to accommodate an ADA accessible trail entrance into Jack Park; and a tree removal permit to allow the removal of nine trees to accommodate the trail. Associated with the project are a new entry sign for Jack Park, enhancements to Krueger Creek,and associated riparian area restoration. APPLICANT: City of Tigard Parks Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97213 OWNERS: City of Tigard Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue 13125 SW Hall Boulevard 20665 SW Blanton St Tigard,Oregon 97213 Aloha,OR 97007 ZONE: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District. The R-4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single-family homes with or without accessory residential units at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single-family units are permitted conditionally. Some civic and institutional uses are also permitted conditionally. LOCATION: 12420 SW 127th Avenue (Jack Park) & 12617 SW Walnut (TVF&R Fire Station 50); Washington County Tax Map 2S104AA,lot 04600;2S104AD,lots 04500&04501 APPLICABLE APPROVAL CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330.020.C; 18.360.090; 18.510.030; 18.510.050; 18.745; 18.765.030-040; 18.765.070; 18.775.020; 18.775.050; 18.775.070; 18.780.130;& 18.790.050. SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 1 OF 34 • SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request for a Sensitive Lands Permit,Tree Removal Permit, and sign permit subject to 5 conditions of approval. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO SITE WORK: Submit to the Planning Department (John Floyd. 503-718-2429 or johnfl(a),tigard-or.gov) for rcview and approval: 1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard Planning Division a copy of all applicable U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon Department of State Lands, and Clean Water Services project authorization permits. 2. Prior to issuance of any site work, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the Tigard Planning Division verifying all contractors have been notified of tree protection procedures through a meeting with all contractors to fully explain the goals of tree protection. 3. Prior to issuance of any site work, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the Tigard Planning Division verifying that tree protection fencing has been erected in a location and manner consistent with the recommendations of the arborists report contained within the project file. Fencing is to remain in the position that is established by the project arborist and not to be moved without written permission from the project arborist until the end of the project. 4. During Construction,the following conditions shall be ongoing: • No traffic shall be allowed within the root protection zone. No vehicle, heavy equipment, or even repeated foot traffic. • No storage of materials including but not limiting to soil, construction material,or waste from the site. Waste includes but is not limited to concrete wash out,gasoline, diesel,paint, cleaner, thinners, etc. c. Construction trailers are not to be parked/placed within the root protection zone without written clearance from project arborist. • No vehicles shall be allowed to park within the root protection areas. • No activity shall be allowed that will cause soil compaction within the root protection zone. • The trees shall be protected from any cutting, skinning or breaking of branches, trunks or roots. • Any roots that are to be cut from existing trees that are to be retained, the project consulting arborist shall be notified to evaluate and oversee the proper cutting of roots with sharp cutting tools. Cut roots are to be immediately covered with soil or mulch to prevent them from drying out. • No grade change should be allowed within the root protection zone unless authorized in writing by the project arborist. • Any necessary deviation of the root protection zone shall be cleared by the project consulting arborist or project owner. • Provide water to trees during the summer months as necessary. Tree(s) that will have had root system(s) cut back will need supplemental water to overcome the loss of ability to absorb SLR2012-lN11103 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 2 OF 34 • . necessary moisture during the summer months. • Any necessary passage of utilities through the root protection zone shall be by means of tunneling under roots by hand digging or boring. 5. Prior to Final Inspection. the project arborist shall submit a report to the Tigard Planning Division verifying the removal of the tree protection fencing, and that all post-construction recommendations of the arborists report contained within the project file have been followed to the satisfaction of the project arborist. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information and History Jack Park is an existing neighborhood park near the intersection of Walnut and 128th Avenue. As stated in the adopted City of Tigard Parks Master Plan (2009), neighborhood parks are intended to serve residents within a 1/4 to 1/2 mile walking distance. Creation of the park dates to 1969,when James Brayson and Q.B. Griffen dedicated Tract B of the Bellwood Subdivision to the City of Tigard for use as a city park. Expanded in subsequent years, the park now occupies 7.03 acres along both sides of Krueger Creek, a perennial stream that flows in a southwest to northeast direction. Existing improvements are located on the west side of the creek and include a baseball field, basketball court, playground equipment, a picnic area, and both open turf and stands of fir trees. A natural resources assessment presented with the application documented mature red alder forest canopy along the creek, with the presence of wetlands adjacent to the creek and an understory predominantly overgrown with Himalayan blackberry. Adjacent to Jack Park is TVF&R Station 50. Built in 2008 the fire station includes a community room and expanded parking area to accommodate visitor parking (CUP2007-00003). In 2009 a lot line adjustment was performed in which TVF&R granted unimproved land along Krueger Creek for the future expansion of Jack Park (LLA2009-00006). Following the lot line adjustment, a minor modification was issued to acknowledge the transferred land as part of the Jack Park facility (MMD2009-00024). Surrounding properties are predominantly developed with low-density, single-family residential. The exception is the Bellwood Terrace Condominium complex, located on the northerly edge of Jack Park. Proposal Description: The project request includes Sensitive Lands Review to construct an ADA accessible trail and bridge to connect existing park facilities to the parking lot of TVF&R Station 50 and associated community room; a Minor Modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit to modify the parking lot and perimeter landscaping; a tree removal permit for the removal of existing trees within the project area; and a sign permit to construct a new monument sign to Jack Park. Associated with the project is riparian restoration and enhancement,including removal of a failed culvert,which is exempted from land use review (see TDC 18.775.020.C.2-4). No additional off-street or on-street parking is proposed. A small playground and/or community gardens may be added to the park following completion of the trail, but these would not require land use review. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The purpose of this section is to demonstrate that the proposed park project meets all the applicable standards and requirements of the Tigard Development Code,Tide 18. SLR2012-0000 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 3 OF 34 • SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REGULATIONS As a result of the Pre-Application Conference, City staff directed the applicant to the following applicable Development Code chapters. 18.330—Conditional Use 18.360—Site Development Review 18.390—Decision Making Procedures 18.510—Residential Zones 18.705 —Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 —Environmental Performance Standards 18.745—Landscaping and Screening 18.765—Off-Street Parking and Loading 18.775 —Sensitive Lands 18.780—Signs 18.790—Tree Removal 18.795 —Visual Clearance 18.810 —Street and Utility Improvement Standards Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) The following standards in this chapter ensure the proposed development will not adversely impact surrounding uses and public facilities. 18.330.020 Approval Process 8.330.020.B. Major modification of approved or existing conditional use. 2. The Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: a. A change in land use; Finding: The requested modification to CUP2007-0003 is related to the number of parking stalls and the removal of certain trees. No change in land use is proposed. This criterion does not apply. b. A 10% increase in dwelling unit density; Finding: The approved CUP2007-0003 was for a fire station, and no residential units were approved. No residences are proposed, and no increase in dwelling unit density is proposed. This criterion does not apply. c. A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; Finding: The requested modification is for the removal of one parking stall through striping to accommodate safe ADA access between the community room at Station 50 and the proposed Jack Park trail entrance. The final approval conditions for the Station 50 CUP stipulated a range in the number of parking stalls allowable to be between 31 and 45 stalls. A total of 39 stalls were included on the approved plans. As part of the proposed park development, the applicant requests a modification of the parking lot by means of asphalt striping to reduce by one the number of parking stalls to accommodate safe, convenient and ADA-accessible entry into the park. The proposed modification will continue to be in accordance with the parking range noted in the Conditions of Approval for CUP2007-0003. No physical change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas is proposed where off-site traffic would be affected. This criterion does not apply. SI,R2012-00 03 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking?Acidification PAGE 4 OF 34 • • d. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10%where previously specified; Finding: No increase in the floor area for Station 50 and the associated community room is proposed.This criterion does not apply. e. A reduction of more than 10% of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space; Finding: The approved CUP2007-00003 did not require common open space; therefore, no reduction in the area for open space is proposed.This criterion does not apply. f.A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20%; Finding: No adjustment to the site layout or to building locations is proposed; therefore no reduction of setback requirements is requested.This criterion does not apply. g. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10%where previously specified provided such as: (1) Recreational facilities; (2) Screening; or (3) Landscaping provisions; Finding: The requested modification is for the removal of one parking stall through striping and an adjacent planting area tree to accommodate safe ADA access between the community room at Station 50 and the proposed Jack Park trail entrance.The proposed removal of one tree west of the parking lot to facilitate the ADA trail connection represents the removal of a screening amenity; however, the planting plan for CUP2007-00003 indicated a total of 28 trees to be planted on site, and the removal of a single tree falls below the 10%threshold noted in this provision. Additionally, the applicant requests the removal of three trees (#1, #3 & #4),which are located off of the TVF&R property. The removal of these three trees when compared to the sum of the protected trees and new trees planted as part of the Station 50 project also falls below the 10% threshold noted in this provision. No change to or elimination of project amenities for recreational facilities is proposed. This criterion does not apply. h. A 10% increase in the approved density; Finding;The approved CUP2007-0003 was for a fire station, and no residential units were approved. No residences are proposed, and no increase in density is proposed. This criterion does not apply. C. Minor Modification of approved or existing conditional Use 1. Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in subsection B above shall be considered a minor modification. Finding: As demonstrated in findings pertaining to Section 18.330.020.E above, the proposal does not meet the criteria for a major modification. As a result a minor modification is required for changes to the existing fire station parking lot and approved landscaping. 3. A minor modification shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied following the Director's review based on the findings that: a. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this tide; Finding: Findings detailed within Section IV of this decision and applicant's application materials SLR201240003 jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Nfodificatton PAGE 5 OF 34 • • demonstrate compliance with all applicable requirements of Tide 18. This criterion is satisfied. b. The modification is not a major modification as defined in [18.330.030.B]. Finding: The proposed project is a minor modification to an existing and approved conditional use permit (CUP2007-00003), as regulated by 18.390.030. Responses to the criteria regarding the determination of a major modification are noted below in the following section. The proposed project does not meet criteria for a major modification and should be deemed a minor modification. Section 18.330.050(B)Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types 5.) Community Recreation and Parks a. All building setbacks shall be a minimum of 30 feet from any property line Finding: No building structures are proposed on the site. This criterion does not apply. b. There are no off-street parking requirements, except ... for a dog park or off-leash area... Finding The proposed park will not be a designated dog park, and there will not be any sort of fenced enclosure where dogs are allowed off-leash. This approval criterion does not apply to the project. Conclusion: The proposal meets all applicable criteria for modifications to an approved conditional use. Site Development Review(Chapter 18.360) 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions A. Applicability and exemptions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and major modification of existing developments, as provided in Section 18.360.050, except it shall not apply to... 5.Any proposed development which has a valid conditional use approved through the conditional use permit application process; Finding: Site development review of the proposed park improvements located on TL 04501 and TL 04600 is exempt, since these proposed improvements are consistent with a valid minor modification of a conditional use approved through Minor Mod MMD2009-00024. The proposed modifications to the adjacent TVF&R Station 50 parking lot does trigger a minor modification of CUP2007-00003,and the remainder of the SDR narrative is specifically directed toward that proposed change. Residential Zoning Districts (Chapter 18.510) Section 18.510.050 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1 All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.370. 2 All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. Finding: As demonstrated in elsewhere in this decision, all applicable standards and requirements are shown to be met. SLR2012-IXNH13 Jack Park Trail Sc TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 6 OR 34 • • B. Development standards. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. r Criteria fromble '[ ` Standard(OM Subject Property Minimum Lot Size 7,500 s.f. 306,227 s.f. Average Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 200 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft. 315 ft. - bridge Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. NA Side yard 5 ft. 152 ft. -bridge Rear yard 15 ft. 520 ft. -bridge Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district — — Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. NA—no garage Maximum Height 30 ft. 4 ft. - bridge Minimum Landscape Requirement — — Finding: As shown in the applicant's narrative, planset and in the comparative table above, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying R-4.5 zoning district. This approval criterion is met. Access. Egress And Circulation (Chapter 18.705) 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Finding: The provisions of this chapter apply to this application due to the proposed construction of a bridge spanning Krueger Creek. No vehicular access is proposed for the park. The City has a memorandum of understanding with TVF&R for use of the adjacent parking lot serving the community room at Station 50. No changes to the existing access location to SW Walnut Street are proposed. This criterion is met. 18.705.030 General Provisions B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Finding: No vehicular access or egress is planned on the subject parcels, and no structures necessitating vehicular traffic are proposed. A site plan has been provided with the application materials to demonstrate the location,width and flow of pedestrian access across the site and relating to the adjacent parking lot at Station 50. This criterion is met. D. Public street access.All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030.H and 18.705.030.I shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Finding: As illustrated on the proposed site plan (Sheets L4.1 & L4.2),no vehicular access and egress to a SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&'R'F&R Parking Modification PAGE 7 OF 34 • • public or private street approved by the City for public use is planned in the future development of the park parcels. Vehicular access to a public street exists at the adjacent parking lot at Station 50, as approved under CUP2OO7-00003,which will provide parking for the proposed park. This requirement does not apply. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Finding: As illustrated on the proposed site plan (Sheets L4.1 &L4.2), no vehicular access and egress is planned for the park parcels, and no curb cuts are proposed. No changes are proposed to curb cuts at the fire station. This requirement does not apply. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial,institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical,walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Finding: This application is not regarding a commercial,institutional, or industrial use;the proposed park development is a civic use. The proposed design includes a trail and an engineered bridge span. Pathways are designed to provide access to and between these public improvements. This requirement does not apply. 2. Within all attached housing (except two-family dwellings) and multi-family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; Finding: The proposed park development is a civic use. This requirement does not apply. 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping, pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum of four feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes,benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; Finding: No new vehicular access, egress or parking lots are planned for the park parcels. No new walkways meeting the criteria set forth in 18.705.O30.F(1) & F(2) above are required or proposed for this project. This requirement does not apply. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc.Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Finding: Although no new walkways as described in 18.705.030.F(1) &F(2) above are required for this SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 8 OF 34 • • project, the proposed design includes a hard surface walkway (e.g., trail) and bridge spanning Krueger Creek. The walkway is designed to drain via sheet flow onto adjacent parkland, and will remain well- drained.As required City municipal code, the park will close at dusk, therefore, additional safety lighting is not required. However,low-level, solar powered lighting may be installed along the trail for added safety and surveillance. While compliant, this criterion does not apply. Environmental Performance Standards (Chapter 18.7251 Section 18.725.020 General Provisions A. Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In addition to the regulations adopted in this chapter, each use, activity or operation within the City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state and federal standards pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere,ground, sewer system or stream. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission pertaining to non-point source pollution control and contained in the Oregon Administrative Rules shall by this reference be made a part of this chapter. Finding: The only additional regulations that apply to the proposed project are related to stormwater management that is the province of Clean Water Services (CWS),which enforces its stormwater manual across much of the county. Compliance with CWS regulations will be ensured through conditions of approval described below in findings pertaining to Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.775 and other agency comments,and the building permit process. This criterion is met. B. Evidence of compliance. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Director may require submission of evidence demonstrating compliance with state, federal and local environmental regulations and receipt of necessary permits; these include Air Contaminant Discharge Permits (ACDP) or Indirect Source Construction Permits (ISCP). Finding: Compliance with this criterion is discussed in other agency comments,where a condition of approval is proposed to ensure compliance. As conditioned, this criterion is met. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Finding:As a public park,low-level,pedestrian type noise is anticipated from the use of the trail. No additional sport fields or playgrounds are proposed, and the range and type of recreation facilities for this neighborhood park likely will not draw large crowds or attract residents from outside the immediate neighborhood area, thereby minimizing the potential for noise disruptions for adjacent neighbors. The type of noise would be in the same category found in any area frequented by walkers,hikers and bicycle riders.Any anticipated level of noise associated with the park use will be within acceptable limits. This criterion is met. B. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam) which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Finding: The proposed project is a public park,which will have no activities that would result in visible emissions. This criterion does not apply. S1.R2012-00003Jack Park Trail&'1V1&R Parking Modification PAGI:9 OF 34 • • C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned. Finding: The proposed project is a public park,which will have no activities that would result in vibration. Any vibration associated with construction will be temporary in nature. This criterion does not apply. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited. DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090) apply. Finding: The proposed project is a public park,which will have no activities that would result in odors. This criterion does not apply. E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare,whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding,which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Finding: The proposed project is a public park,which will have no activities that would result in undue glare and heat. This criterion does not apply. F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. Finding: As per standard city park maintenance practices,waste containers will be accessible for collection by maintenance staff daily. Park maintenance staff will manage the disposal of refuse and other "wet" garbage in the industrially-acceptable manner that prevents any potential vector infestation. This criterion will be met. Landscaping and Screening (Chapter 18.745) 18.745.030 General Provisions C. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1.All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. Finding: The landscaping plan (Sheets 1,7.1 -L7.3) for the proposed park includes standard installation guidelines used by the industry to which the applicant will adhere during installation. This criterion is met. 2. The plant materials shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock (ANSI Z60, 1-1986, and any future revisions). Finding: Per the application narrative, plant materials will be obtained from a certified landscaping purveyor to meet the size and grade standards for each specimen,in compliance with these requirements. This criterion is met. 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&T VF&R Parking Modification PAGE 10 OF 34 • . Finding: As demonstrated elsewhere in this decision,landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. This criterion is met. D. Certificate of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Finding: The applicant understands that the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be granted until the required landscaping is installed,inspected and approved by the City. In order to ensure compliance, a condition of approval is being added to ensure compliance with this standard. Condition: Prior to final building inspection the applicant shall obtain approval for a final planning inspection. E. Protection of existing vegetation. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around individual trees). Finding: The tree preservation and mitigation plan (Sheets L1.1 -L1.3 and Arborist Report prepared by Teragan&Associates, Inc.) and Clean Water Services Service Provider Letter includes information that illustrates the measures taken to protect existing vegetation,in compliance with this requirement. The landscaping plan (Sheets L7.1 - L7.3) notes the existing vegetation to be preserved, except for 17 trees identified for removal due to poor tree health and/or unavoidable conflicts with the proposed site development.As discussed in 18.790 a tree protection plan is not required for Minor Modifications or sensitive land reviews,but the applicant has submitted an arborists report prepared by Teragan& Associates that included recommendations for the protection of existing trees. These recommendations were included as Attachment #1 to the arborist's report. In order to ensure existing vegetation is protected in a manner consistent with the project arborists recommendations, the following conditions of approval are recommended. As conditioned, this criterion will be me. Conditions: Prior to issuance of any sitework, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the Tigard Planning Division verifying all contractors have been notified of tree protection procedures through a meeting with all contractors to fully explain the goals of tree protection. Prior to issuance of any sitework, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the Tigard Planning Division verifying that tree protection fencing has been erected in a location and manner consistent with the recommendations of the arborists report contained within the project file. Fencing is to remain in the position that is established by the project arborist and not to be moved without written permission from the project arborist until the end of the project. During Construction, the following conditions shall be ongoing: • No traffic shall be allowed within the root protection zone. No vehicle, heavy equipment, or even repeated foot traffic. • No storage of materials including but not limiting to soil, construction material,or waste from the site. Waste includes but is not limited to concrete wash out,gasoline, diesel,paint, cleaner, thinners, etc. c. Construction trailers are not to be parked/placed within the root protection SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&TVP&R Parking Modification PAGE 11 OF 34 • zone without written clearance from project arborist. • No vehicles shall be allowed to park within the root protection areas. • No activity shall be allowed that will cause soil compaction within the root protection zone. • The trees shall be protected from any cutting, skinning or breaking of branches, trunks or roots. • Any roots that are to be cut from existing trees that are to be retained, the project consulting arborist shall be notified to evaluate and oversee the proper cutting of roots with sharp cutting tools. Cut roots are to be immediately covered with soil or mulch to prevent them from drying out. • No grade change should be allowed within the root protection zone unless authorized in writing by the project arborist. • Any necessary deviation of the root protection zone shall be cleared by the project consulting arborist or project owner. • Provide water to trees during the summer months as necessary. Tree(s) that will have had root system(s) cut back will need supplemental water to overcome the loss of ability to absorb necessary moisture during the summer months. • Any necessary passage of utilities through the root protection zone shall be by means of tunneling under roots by hand digging or boring. Prior to Final Inspection. the project arborist shall submit a report to the Tigard Planning Division verifying the removal of the tree protection fencing,and that all post-construction recommendations of the arborists report contained within the project file have been followed to the satisfaction of the project arborist. F. Care of landscaping along public rights-of-way.Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials shall be provided by the owner of the property abutting the rights-of-way unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the general public. Finding: The applicant acknowledges that it has the obligation for care of street trees and other vegetation within the public right-of-way along the park's frontage,and protected as discussed in findings pertaining to Chapter 18.790 below. This criterion is met. Section 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Protection of existing vegetation.All development projects fronting on a public street,private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.04O.C. Finding: Street trees along SW Walnut Street were planted with the improvements to this street several years ago by Washington County. The existing street trees were planted consistent with these requirements. No new street trees are proposed for this project. The provision is met. B. Street tree planting list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury. Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director. Finding: As illustrated in the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet L0.1), the frontage along SW Walnut Street previously has been improved to include street trees consistent with this provision. This requirement is met. C. Size and spacing of street trees 1. Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of SLR2012-00003 Jack Park'1 rail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 12 OF 34 • • two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Section 18.745.040.C.2 below. Finding:As illustrated in the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet L0.1), the frontage along SW Walnut Street previously has been improved to include street trees consistent with this provision. This requirement is met. 2. The specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows: a. Small or narrow-stature trees under 25 feet tall and less than 16 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet apart; b. Medium-sized trees 25 feet to 40 feet tall, 16 feet to 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet apart; c. Large trees over 40 feet tall and more than 35 feet wide branching at maturity shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet apart; d. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection/ nor closer than two feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants or utility poles to maintain visual clearance. e. No new utility pole location shall be established closer than five feet to any existing street tree. f. Tree pits shall be located so as not to include utilities (e.g.,water and gas meters) in the tree well. g. On-premises utilities (e.g.,water and gas meters) shall not be installed within existing tree well areas. h. Street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards. i. New light standards shall not be positioned closer than 20 feet to existing street trees except when public safety dictates, then they may be positioned no closer than 10 feet. j. Where there are overhead power lines, the street tree species selected shall be of a type which, at full maturity,will not interfere with the lines. k. Trees shall not be planted within two feet from the face of the curb. 1. Trees shall not be planted within two feet of any permanent hard surface paving or walkway: Finding:As illustrated in the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet L0.1), the frontage along SW Walnut Street previously has been improved to include street trees consistent with this provision. These requirements are met. Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter (Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering,but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix. Finding: The proposed use is Community Recreation,which is not a listed use in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2, and no parking lots are proposed. This criterion does not apply. C. Setbacks for fences or walls (1-4) 1. No fence or wall shall be constructed which exceeds the standards in Section 18.745.050.C.2 except when the approval authority, as a condition of approval, allows that a fence or wall be constructed to a height greater than otherwise permitted to mitigate against potential adverse effects. SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&TV'F&R Parking Modification PAGE 13 OF 34 • • 2. Fences or Walls. a. May not exceed three feet in height in a required front yard along local streets or eight feet in all other locations and, in all other cases, shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795; b. Are permitted up to six feet in height in front yards adjacent to any designated arterial or collector street. For any fence over three feet in height in the required front yard area, permission shall be subject to administrative review of the location of the fence or wall. 3. All fences or walls shall meet vision clearance area requirements in Chapter 18.795. 4. All fences or walls greater than six feet in height shall be subject to building permit approval. Finding:Although not required for buffering or screening, an existing, 3' high,wood split rail fence is located approximately 6'west of the property edge near the Station 50 parking lot. As illustrated on the Layout Plan (Sheet L4.1),this application proposes to re-locate the split rail fence to the property edge with Station 50. The existing fence will be re-aligned and re-installed in its current dimensions. At the proposed height of 3 feet,this side yard fence will be within the allowable height restrictions. The proposed fence will not interfere with visual clearance requirements,and as demonstrated in the remainder of this narrative,the provisions of Chapter 18.795 have been met. The requirements regarding the setbacks for walls and fences have been met. E. Screening: Special Provisions 1. Screening and landscaping of parking and loading areas: a. Screening of parking and loading areas is required. The specifications for this screening are as follows: (1) landscaped parking areas shall include special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. These design features may include the use of landscaped berms, decorative walls, and raised planters; (2) landscape planters may be used to define or screen the appearance of off-street parking areas from the public right of way; (3) Materials to be installed should achieve a balance between low-lying and vertical shrubbery and trees; (4) Trees shall be planted in landscaped islands in all parking areas, and shall be equally distributed and on the basis of one tree for each seven parking spaces in order to provide a canopy effect; and (5) The minimum dimension of the landscape islands shall be three feet and the landscaping shall be protected from vehicular damage by some form of wheel guard or curb. Finding: The project would alter approximately 160 square feet of perimeter screening around the TVF&R Fire Station parking lot. This screening was approved under CUP2O07-00003 as part of the construction of the fire station. Proposed changes include the removal of one tree and approximately two shrubs to accommodate an ADA accessible pedestrian path. The overall effectiveness of the screening would not be significantly reduced, and sufficient trees remain in the parking lot to exceed the one tree per seven parking spaces. This criterion is met. Section 18.745.060 Re-vegetation A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. Finding: The proposed Landscaping Plan (Sheets L7.1 -L7.3) illustrate all proposed landscaped areas, including those re-planted following construction,in compliance with this requirement. This criterion is met. SLR2012-00103 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Ivio icatiim PAGE 14 OF 34 • B. Preparation for re-vegetation. Topsoil removed from om the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway. Finding: As part of the instructions by the applicant's consulting landscape architect and conditions of the Service Provider Letter and findings discussed in other agency comments below, the measures governing re-vegetation will be undertaken in compliance with these requirements. Off-Street Parking and Loading (Chapter 18.765) Section 18.765.030 General Provisions (A-H) A.Vehicle parking plan requirements B. Location of vehicle parking C.Joint parking D. Parking in mixed-use projects E.Visitor parking in multifamily residential developments F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking G. Disabled-accessible parking H. DEQ indirect source construction permit Finding: Chapter 18.330.050.B(5) directs that there are no off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation,except for dog parks. The proposed project is not,and does not contain,a dog park. The reduction of parking stalls at the fire station from 39 to 38 stalls is within the range approved under CUP2007-00003. This provision and the remaining provisions (A-H) of this subsection do not apply. Section 18.765.040 General Design Standards (A-N) A. Maintenance of parking areas B. Access drives C. Loading/unloading driveways D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use E. Curb cuts F. Pedestrian access G. Parking lot landscaping H. Parking space surfacing I. Parking lot striping J. Wheel stops K. Drainage L. Lighting M. Signs N. Space and aisle dimensions Finding: Chapter 18.330.050.B(5) directs that there are no off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation, except for dog parks. The proposed project is not, and does not contain,a dog park. The conversion of one parking stall to striped pedestrian pathway does not affect parking lot design standards. This provision and the remaining provisions (A-N) of this subsection do not apply. Section 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: 1. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Finding:As illustrated on the site plan (Sheet L4.1), a bicycle parking area containing three bike racks is located adjacent to the trail. No structures or buildings are proposed on the park site, and no additional square footage is being added to the fire station. This criterion does not apply. SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&'IA'I+&R Parking Modification PAGE 15 OF 34 • • 2. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; Finding:As illustrated on the site plan (Sheet L4.1), the proposed bicycle parking area is not located within a parking aisle,landscape area or pedestrian way. This provision is met. 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area will be visible from SW Walnut and from the parking lot at Station 50. This criterion is met. 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Finding: No enclosed buildings are proposed in which bicycle parking could be located. This provision does not apply. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long-term (employee) parking is encouraged but not required; Finding: The applicant has selected a bicycle rack system that meets this requirement. This criterion is met. 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground,wall or other structure; Finding: The proposed bike racks will be installed with concrete footings to securely anchor them to the site. This criterion will be met. 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and,when covered,with a vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area is 6-1/2 feet wide by 10 feet long.A single row of bike racks is proposed.This criterion is met. 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area has been designed to meet this requirement as illustrated on the site plan (Sheet L4.2). This criterion is met. 5. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; SLR2012-00003 jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 16 OF 34 • • Finding: As a future city park, the applicant has stated there are no plans to rent or lease the required bicycle racks. This criterion will be met. 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area is reserved for this parking function only,in compliance with this criterion. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material,i.e., pavers, asphalt, concrete, other pervious paving surfaces, or similar material. This surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Finding: The proposed bike racks will be installed with concrete footings and will be located within a pervious, 1/4"minus gravel, hard-surfaced area adjacent to the trail. This criterion will be met. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Finding:According to Table 18.768.2, the minimum bicycle parking for Community Recreation is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of floor area, or 2 spaces. There are no structures proposed for this site. Three racks are proposed as noted on Sheet L4.1 and Detail Sheet L8.2. This criterion is met. Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements A. Parking requirements for unlisted uses. 1. The Director may rule that a use, not specifically listed in Section 18.765.070.H, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. If the applicant requests that the Director's decision be rendered in writing, it shall constitute a Director's Interpretation, as governed by Section 18.340. Finding: Minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation are identified in Table 18.765.2. However, Chapter 18.330.050.B(5) directs that there are no off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation, except for dog parks. The proposed project is not, and does not contain, a dog park. This provision and the remaining provisions (BI) of this subsection do not apply. Sensitive Lands (Chapter 18.775) Section 18.775.020 Applicability of Uses: Permitted, Prohibited, and Nonconforming A. CWS Stormwater Connection Permit. All proposed "development", must obtain a Stormwater Connection Permit from CWS pursuant to its "Design and Construction Standards".As used in this chapter, the meaning of the word "development" shall be as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards":All human-induced changes to improved or unimproved real property including: 1 Construction of structures requiring a building permit, if such structures are external to existing structures; 2 Land division; 3 Drilling; 4 Site alterations resulting from surface mining or dredging; 5 Grading; 6 Construction of earthen berms; SLR2012-0000.3 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 17 OF 34 410 S 7 Paving; 8 Excavation; or 9 Clearing when it results in the removal of trees or vegetation which would require a permit from the local jurisdiction or an Oregon Department of Forestry tree removal permit. Finding:The proposed project proposes the construction of a paved trail and bridge over Krueger Creek, and these site improvements will cross sensitive lands,including natural drainageways and segments of areas with steep slopes.As discussed in findings and conditions pertaining to other agency comments on the project,a CWS Stormwater Connection Permit will be obtained for this project.All construction, grading, excavation and paving activities will be done in conformance with CWS Standards. This criterion will be met. C. Exemptions.When performed under the direction of the City, and in compliance with the provisions of the City of Tigard Standards and Specifications for Riparian Area Management, on file in the Engineering Division, the following shall be exempt from the provisions of this section: 1 Responses to public emergencies, including emergency repairs to public facilities; 2 Stream and wetlands restoration and enhancement programs; 3 Non-native vegetation removal 4 Planting of native plant species; and 5. Routine maintenance or replacement of existing public facilities projects. Finding: This project will be performed by the City of Tigard (applicant) and includes the implementation of elements of the City's Healthy Streams Program. Specifically, the project removes an undersized culvert from Kruger Creek,removes non-native vegetation, and installs native riparian plants significantly improving the health and function of the vegetated corridor and stream. This project is consistent with the City's ongoing culvert replacement program and will be in compliance with the Standards and Specifications for Riparian Area Management. The City has a strong record and long history in projects similar to the proposed project. The City removed a creek culvert and replaced it with a bridge and boardwalk at Englewood Park,which is comparable to the proposed project. Additionally, the City has over 170 acres of vegetated corridor enhancement projects underway, and the proposed improvements to the Krueger Creek vegetated corridor are part of the enhancement program.As noted below, the proposed project is also consistent with the intent for planned culvert removals as part of the CWS Healthy Streams Plan. City stream restoration programs are exempt from the provisions of this Chapter. Responses to subsequent sections have been provided to add information and clarity about the project's intent, scope and impacts. As shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet L0.2), two failed pipe culvert exist on site in the area of Krueger Creek,at the southern foot of trees #25 and #26. The first is a 9 foot long,24 inch corrugated metal pipe that is embedded within and lodged into the stream bank above the water line. This pipe is located tangential to the creek corridor and serves no functional purpose. It is buried under approximately 18" of soil and entwined in the roots of native trees (#25 & #26). This pipe is not impairing stream flow and will be left in place to avoid disturbing the existing native trees which are providing valuable shade for the stream. The second culvert is a 7 foot long steel pipe that is located directly in the stream channel and was likely part of an old stream crossing. This pipe is also non-functional,as creek water passes around both sides of the pipe, through the pipe, and possible under the pipe. This pipe is undersized for significant floods, alters the geomorphic condition of the stream and impairs fish passage. The pipe should be considered as debris rather than water management infrastructure. The project intent is to remove the pipe culvert and renmants of the old stream crossing located within the creek, and replace it with a bridge that spans the stream channel and its associated buffer. This will SLR—'�12-0IXM)3 Jack Park Trail&"I'VI&R Parking Modification PAGE 18 OF 34 • • eliminate pedestrian foot traffic in and at the creek edge and relocate traffic over the full extent of the creek and its associated wetlands. This new bridge will span the stream channel resulting in unimpaired fish passage and eliminating the demand trails that currently cross the creek. By opening up both the stream channel and it's adjacent buffer the bridge will provide more than adequate conveyance for flood flows. These conditions are expected to decrease erosion of the stream channel and significantly improve water quality.The pipe culvert removal is consistent with the CWS Healthy Streams Plan and is a noted culvert on Map I-5 of the Healthy Streams Plan as a priority level#6 culvert (on a 10-point scale,where 10 is highest priority).Along with the removal of the steel pipe,the project proposes the removal of invasive species (i.e.,blackberries) and replanting the vegetated corridor consistent with CWS requirements. The removal of this culvert is part of a larger programmatic process to replace or remove culverts as part of the existing culvert replacement program. The planned removal and retrofitting of the failed pipe culvert with a bridge is also exempt from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands permits.The pipe and subsequent replacement bridge is not located within the wetlands, and the volume of soil disturbance, approximately 1 cubic yard,is far below the minimum thresholds for permitting,which are 10 cubic yards of removal (Corps) and 50 cubic yards of removal (DSL). Construction methodology used to remove the culvert and set the new bridge will be completed with a large crane. The crane will be able to lift the existing culvert out of the area with minimal mechanical disturbance to the bank or creek. As a result,work pertaining to the removal of steel culverts, the construction of a bridge,and associated riparian area restoration is exempt from the provisions of this chapter under exemption criterion 2 through 4 (stream and wetlands restoration and enhancement programs,removal of non-native vegetation, and the planting of native vegetation). Work associated with these activities is therefore out of scope for this land use application and will not be addressed in any further findings below,which be limited to the new ADA accessible trail that will connect to the bridge. D.Jurisdictional wetlands. Landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, CWS, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies, and are not designated as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map", do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained.All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands which are not under state or federal jurisdiction. Finding: The project site includes a locally significant wetland and a vegetated corridor associated with Krueger Creek,as shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheets L0.1 to L0.3) and submitted Service Provider Letter and Natural Resources Assessment prepared by Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. The proposed development does not impact or alter wetlands on site. Work is not proposed within the wetlands, but will occur within the vegetated corridors.As described in the Natural Resource Assessment, the vegetated corridor width for the project is defined as 50 feet from the creek. Limited impacts to the vegetated corridor are proposed,and mitigation and enhancements are planned in accordance with the requirements outlined in the CWS Service Provider Letter. Oregon Department of State Lands commented on the project, and compliance with their requirements is discussed in findings and conditions pertaining to other agency comments below. This criterion is satisfied. 18.775.030 Administrative Provisions A. Interagency coordination. The appropriate approval authority shall review all sensitive lands permit applications to determine that all necessary permits shall be obtained from those federal, state, or local governmental agencies from which prior approval is also required. 1. As governed by CWS "Design and Construction Standards," the necessary permits for all SLR2012-( XX)3 Jack Park Trail&IVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 19 OF 34 • S "development," as defined in Section 18.775.020.A above, shall include a CWS Service Provider Letter,which specifies the conditions and requirements necessary, if any, for an applicant to comply with CWS water quality protection standards and for the Agency to issue a Stormwater Connection Permit. Finding: The applicant has provided the Service Provider Letter from CWS with this application,which specifies the necessary conditions and requirements. As discussed in findings pertaining to other agency comments, a condition will be added to ensure compliance with CWS Design and Construction Standards during construction. This criterion is met. B.Alteration or relocation of water course. 1 The Director shall notify communities adjacent to the affected area and the State Department of Land Conservation and Development prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Insurance Administration; 2 The Director shall require that maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated portion of a watercourse so that the flood-carrying capacity is not diminished. Finding: The project does not require the alteration of any watercourse. This criterion does not apply. 18.775.050 General Provisions for Wetlands A. Code compliance requirements. Wetland regulations apply to those areas classified as significant on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map," and to a vegetated corridor ranging from 25 to 200 feet wide, measured horizontally, from the defined boundaries of the wetland,per"Table 3.1,Vegetated Corridor Widths," and "Appendix C,Natural Resource Assessments," of the CWS "Design and Construction Standards." Wetland locations may include but are not limited to those areas identified as wetlands in "Wetland Inventory and Assessment for the City of Tigard, Oregon," Fishman Environmental Services,1994. Finding: The project site includes a locally significant wetland and a vegetated corridor associated with Krueger Creek,as shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheets L0.1 to L0.3). As noted in previous findings pertaining to 18.775.020.B,all work associated with the culvert removal,bridge construction, and wetlands restoration and enhancement is exempt from sensitive lands review and not subject land use review. The only portion of the project subject to sensitive lands review is the new ADA accessible access trail. The proposed trail does not impact or alter the delineated wetlands on site.Work is not proposed within the wetlands,but will occur within the vegetated corridors.Work within the wetland vegetated corridor requires a Type II sensitive lands permit, consistent with the findings contained in the final order for the TVF&R Fire Station Conditional Use Permit (CUP2007-00003) that found the vegetative corridor for this wetland to be a CWS water quality buffer not subject to the safe harbor provisions of Goal 5. The applicant has applied for the permit and addressed the relative criteria. As described in the Natural Resource Assessment prepared by Pacific Habitat Services,the vegetated corridor width for the project is defined as 50 feet from the creek. Limited impacts to the vegetated corridor are proposed,and mitigation and enhancements are planned in accordance with the requirements outlined in the CWS Service Provider Letter.The extents of the vegetated corridor, as determined by CWS, are shown in the applicant's plans. As described and conditioned within this decision, the applicant can and will comply with all applicable wetland regulations. This criterion is satisfied. B. Delineation of wetland boundaries. Precise boundaries may vary from those shown on wetland maps; specific delineation of wetland boundaries may be necessary. Wetland delineation will be done by qualified professionals at the applicant's expense. SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Park mg PAGE 2(1 OF 34 • • Finding: The Existing Conditions Plan (Sheets L0.1 to L0.3) included with this application indicate the extent of mapped wetlands and the vegetated corridor located on the project site, as prepared by Pacific Habitat Services and PBS Environmental to meet CWS requirements. This criterion is met. 18.775.070 Sensitive Land Permits A. Permits required.An applicant,who wishes to develop within a sensitive area, as defined in Chapter 18.775, must obtain a permit in certain situations. Depending on the nature and intensity of the proposed activity within a sensitive area, either a Type II or Type III permit is required, as delineated in Sections 18.775.020.F and 18.775.020.G. The approval criteria for various kinds of sensitive areas, e.g., floodplain, are presented in Sections 18.775.070.B- 18.775.070.E below. B. Within the 100-year floodplain. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: (#1 - #7) Finding: The proposed project does not impact or encroach within a 100-year floodplain or conflict with a 1996 flood inundation line. This criterion does not apply. C. With steep slopes. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25% or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; Finding: The project area that is impacted by steep slopes is limited to a narrow band of side slope existing to the northwest of Station 50 in the transition between the upland shelf and Krueger Creek.A six foot wide asphalt trail with one foot gravel shoulders is proposed for pedestrian and bicycle users. An asphalt surface will allow complete ADA accessibility, year-round use, durability and future ease of maintenance. The proposed width of the trail is the minimum necessary to serve the intended use. The proposed trail alignment crosses the area of steep slopes by design necessity.A very small area of slope greater than 25%will be disturbed. The total length of the proposed trail is 725 feet, and total length of trail passing through steep slopes is 125 feet (16 % of total trail). As designed, the public use trail must meet the requirements of ADA,which include a maximum longitudinal slope of 5% and a maximum cross slope of 2%. The side hill northwest of Station 50 is the only feasible route to align the public trail due to the optimal location of the bridge span to avoid wetland impacts and to simultaneously satisfy ADA requirements of a 5%trail slope.Additionally, a geotechnical report was prepared by Geotechnics LLC and included with the application. The report concluded that the slopes in the vicinity of the proposed bridge foundation are stable for both static and seismic conditions and will have no adverse impact on slope stability.The extent of the proposed trail will not create disturbances to an extent greater than that required to meet ADA guidelines. This criterion is met. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; Finding: This provision will be met. The Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheets L5.1 & L5.2) and subsequent constructions plans and specifications identify measures, such as silt fencing and jute netting, to minimize soil movement and prevent erosion and stream sedimentation. An erosion control plan will also be required, as discussed in findings pertaining to other agency comments. This criterion is satisfied. 3. The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper SI.R2o12-OO003 Jack Park Trail&TVl'&R Parking,Modification PAGE 21 01 34 • drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions: wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability; compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to-bedrock; and Finding: No structures are proposed within areas of steep slopes. The bridge and the bridge abutments are located on more gradual slopes. The proposed trail segments that cross limited areas of steep slopes are designed to ensure proper drainage. This provision does not apply. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745,Landscaping and Screening. Finding: This application will not have negative impacts to native vegetation. Only one tree, a non-native, exotic sycamore maple (#4), exists on site that is within an area of steep slope and will be removed due to its poor condition and conflict with the proposed trail location.Along Krueger Creek in the area of the proposed bridge, eleven alder trees (#27 - #30, #32& #37 - #42), one non-native common hawthorn (#53) and one cottonwood (#43) are identified for removal. These trees are not within steep slope areas. Five of the alders are dead, and the remaining trees of the group conflict with the location of the proposed bridge. New plantings are proposed within the corridor, and this project has been conditioned by the applicant's CWS Service Provider Letter to enhance the corridor to meet or exceed good condition, consistent with this standard. Findings and conditions pertaining to other agency comments will ensure CWS requirements will be complied with. This criterion will be met. D. Within drainageways. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; Finding: The extent of the proposed trail will not create disturbances to an extent greater than that required to meet ADA guidelines. Disturbed areas of the drainageway and vegetated corridor be restored and enhanced as per the conditions of the CWS Service Provider Letter. This criterion will be met. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation,ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; Finding: The proposed development of the trail within the vegetated corridor will be minimized and protected with erosion control measures. Erosion control measures required by CWS regulations,along with the construction plans and specifications,will ensure the proposed trail improvements will not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, consistent with these standards. This provision will be met. 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; Finding: As noted above, the proposed bridge is exempt from sensitive lands review and this criterion does not apply. Nevertheless, the application demonstrates that the project as a whole will not affect the water flow capacity of the Krueger Creek drainageway, and the proposed bridge is designed to an elevation to provide at least 6" of clear freeboard above modeled peak stage flows. A hydraulic analysis was completed by Salmon River Engineering PLLC for the project to determine if there are any restrictions to the proposed bridge low chord from potential flood levels on Krueger Creek. The low chord is defined as the bottom of a bridge deck or the underlying support structure that first contacts rising water during a flood.According to Greg Berry with the City of Tigard Engineering Department, there are no specific SI112012-00003 Jack Park Trail&TV'F&R Parking Modification PAGE 22 OF 34 • • design standards relevant to the creek crossing within the park. Mr. Berry suggested the proposed bridge should be designed to provide 6 inches of freeboard above the stage predicted for a peak discharge of 68 cubic feet per second which corresponds to a recurrence interval of 10-years and land use based upon the Metro 2040 Plan. Flood stage was estimated for the proposed bridge location using the Manning Equation, and the analysis resulted in a recommended minimum elevation for the bridge low chord as 212.6 feet or higher. As designed, the low chord of the bridge will be set at an elevation of approximately 217 feet,well above the estimated 10-year flood level occurrence of 212.6 feet in elevation, to minimize potential for trapping floating debris under or against the proposed bridge during a larger flood and to better facilitate wildlife passage under the bridge structure. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; Finding:As previously noted, this application will not have any negative impacts to native vegetation. The areas of the drainageway and vegetated corridor that are disturbed to construct the trail and bridge will be restored and enhanced as per conditioned by the CWS Service Provider Letter,and as described in the findings pertianing to Chapter 18.775, the provisions regarding landscaping and screen have been met. This criterion will be met. 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; Finding: The drainageway is not being replaced, and the flow capacity of the corridor will not be impacted. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 6. The necessary U.S.Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and CWS approvals shall be obtained; Finding: The applicant does not propose any landform alterations or development within the delineated wetlands on site; therefore U.S.ACOE and Oregon DSL permits are not required. The planned removal of the non-functional pipe culvert is also exempt from U.S. ACOE and Oregon DSL permits, since the projected disturbance (approximately 1 cubic yard) is below the permit thresholds of 10 cubic yards of removal (Corps) and 50 cubic yards of removal (DSL). The CWS Service Provider Letter No 12-001787 is included within this application,which outlines additional conditions for the proposed project,including condition 3 which requires the applicant to gain authorization from Oregon Department of State Lands and the US Army Corps of Engineers for activities within CWS sensitive areas. As discussed in other agency comments below,all applicable permits must be obtained prior to site disturbanced. As conditioned, this criterion will be satisfied. 7.Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the 100- year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. Finding: This project does not proposed land form alterations or development within or adjacent to a 100- year floodplain. This criterion does not apply. E. Within wetlands. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within wetlands based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: SLR2012-0t003 jack Park Trail&'1'VF&R Farling Modification PAGI S 23 OF 34 • • 1. The proposed land form alteration or development is neither on wetland in an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor is within the vegetative corridor established per"Table 3.1 Vegetative Corridor Widths" and "Appendix C: Natural Resources Assessments" of the CWS "Design and Construction Standards," for such a wetland; Finding: The project site includes a locally significant wetland and a vegetated corridor associated with Krueger Creek,as shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheets L0.1 to L0.3).The proposed development does not impact or alter delineated wetlands on site. Work is not proposed within the wetlands,but will occur within the vegetated corridors. The bridge and trail cross through the vegetated corridor associated with Krueger Creek, and impacts to these sensitive lands have been addressed under the subsections of this Chapter pertaining to drainageways and steep slopes. Work within the wetland buffer would require a Type II sensitive lands permit, consistent with the findings contained in the final order for the TF&R Fire Station Conditional Use Permit (CUP2007-00003) that allowed work within the vegetated corridor of these same delineated wetlands subject to a Type II sensitive lands permit. The application has applied for such a permit. As this project occurs on land previously the subject of that permit,the Director is following the Hearings Officers prior determination in making this decision. This criterion is met. 2. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; Finding: This project does not proposed land form alterations or development within the delineated wetlands on site. Site disturbances within the wetland buffer will be minimized and protected with erosion control measures, consistent with Clean Water Services regulations and requirements. This criterion will be met. 3. Any encroachment or change in on-site or off-site drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated; Finding: No impacts to delineated wetlands are proposed with this project. The areas of the wetland buffer that are disturbed to construct the trail will be restored and enhanced as per conditions of the CWS regulations and requirements set forth in the Service Provider Letter. This criterion will be met. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, erosion control provisions of the Surface Water Management program of Washington County must be met and areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted in like or similar species in accordance with Chapter 18.745,Landscaping and Screening; Finding: As previously noted, this application will not have any negative impacts to native vegetation. The areas of the wetland buffer that are disturbed to construct the trail will be restored and enhanced as per conditioned by the CWS Service Provider Letter, and as described in the responses to Chapter 18.775, the provisions regarding landscaping and screen have been met. This criterion will be met. 5. All other sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been met; Finding: As discussed elsewhere above and below, the applicable sensitive land requirements of Chapter 18.775 have been met. This criterion will be met. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and CWS approvals shall be obtained; SLR2012-00003 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 24 OF 34 • S Finding: The applicant does not propose any landform alterations or development within wetlands on site; therefore U.S. ACOE and Oregon DSL permits are not required. The CWS Service Provider Letter (No. 12-001787) provided with the application requires the applicant to gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Department of State Lands and US Army Corps of Engineers, and present copies of said permits if applicable. As discussed in findings and conditions pertaining to other agency comments, all applicable approvals shall be obtained should they be found necessary by the listed agencies. As a result of this condition, this criterion will be met 7. The provisions of Chapter 18.790,Tree Removal, shall be met; Finding: As detailed in findings pertaining to Chapter 18.790, the provisions of Chapter 18.790 have been addressed and met. This criterion is satisfied. 8. Physical Limitations and Natural Hazards, Floodplains and Wetlands, Natural Areas, and Parks, Recreation and Open Space policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been satisfied. Finding: The Tigard Development Code is the implementing tool of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and as adopted has been found consistent with the applicable goals and policies therein. Consistency with applicable regulations therefore is consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is satisfied. Signs (18.780) A. In the R-7, R-4.5. R-3.5, R-2 and R-1 Zones. No sign of any character shall be permitted in an R-7, R-4.5, R-3.5, R-2 or R-1 zone except the following: 4. For nonresidential uses, one illuminated or non-illuminated freestanding sign not exceeding six feet in height and 32 feet square feet in area per sign face for uses approved under the site development review or conditional use process will be permitted. Wall signs may not exceed five percent of the gross area of the wall face on which the sign is mounted. Finding: The project includes a new entry sign measuring 3' tall by 4'wide,with a sign area of 8 square feet. The sign is associated with Jack Park, a lawful conditional use. This criterion is met. Tree Removal (Chapter 18.790) 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requitement A. Tree plan required.A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot, parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision,partition, site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. Finding: As the proposed project does not partition or subdivide land, or require a side development review or subdivision or planned development, a tree plan is not required. This criterion does not apply. 18.790.050 Permit Applicability A. Removal permit required. Tree removal permits shall be required only for the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using the following approval criteria: Finding: Thirteen of the seventeen trees proposed for removal lie within a sensitive land as defined by Chapter 18.775.010.G of the Tigard Development Code.The regulated trees include 11 alders, 1 cottonwood and 1 hawthorn. A tree removal permit for these trees is required, and an application for their removal has been recieved with this application. This criterion is satisfied. SLR2012-00003 fad;Park'I'rail&TV F&R Padung Modification P AG I:25 OF 34 i • 1. Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan which precludes: a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping, discharge or as a result of the action of erosion; Finding: In the areas of the proposed tee removals, silt fencing will be installed as shown on the Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheets L5.1 &L5.2). No deposits of mud, dirt or sediment are anticipated that will negatively impact public or private streets,adjacent property, or into the storm and surface water system. This criterion is satisfied. b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington County Unified Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules. Finding: The Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheets L5.1 &L5.2) shows erosion control measures will be employed during the construction period,consistent with Clean Water Service permit requirements. The project includes replanting the vegetated corridor with trees and other vegetation pursuant to CWS's enhancement standards. The erosion control measures required by CWS, along with the construction plans and specifications,will ensure the proposed tree removal and excavation will not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, consistent with these standards. This criterion is satisfied. 2. Within stream or wetland corridors, as defined as 50 feet from the boundary of the stream or wetland, tree removal must maintain no less than a 75% canopy cover or no less than the existing canopy cover if the existing canopy cover is less than 75%. Finding: The proposed tree removals are within the Krueger Creek corridor. As measured from 50 feet from the creek, the existing canopy coverage is approximately 83% across both City-owned tax lots (TL 04501 & 04600)within this corridor. The removal of the proposed trees will temporarily lower the canopy coverage to 77%.Additionally,new plantings are proposed within the corridor, and this project has been conditioned by the applicant's CWS Service Provider Letter to provide enhance the corridor to meet or exceed good condition as defined in R&O 07-20, Section 3.14.2,Table3-3, consistent with this standard. This criterion is satisfied. Visual Clearance Area (Chapter 18.795) 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements A.At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. B. Obstructions prohibited.A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge, planting, fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree),exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area, provided all branches below eight feet are removed. C. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges, plantings, fences,walls,wall structures and temporary or permanent obstructions shall be further reduced in height or eliminated to comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. Sl.R21112-111 X jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 26 OF 34 • Finding: The site for the proposed park improvements are not adjacent to an intersection of two streets or a street and a railroad, and the proposed project does not include a driveway providing access to a public or private street or affect the driveway accesses approved under CUP2007-00003.Therefore, these criteria do not apply. Street and Utility Improvement Standards (Chapter 18.810) 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. Finding: The site fronts onto SW 127th Avenue and SW Walnut Street,which are public Streets. This criterion is satisfied. 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of this chapter. Finding: The proposed project does not include a street within the development. This criterion does not apply. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter,provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. Finding: The adjacent street, SW Walnut Street,has been previously improved to meet the standards of this chapter. There are no street improvements proposed or required with this project. This criterion does not apply. J. Existing rights-of-way. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shall be provided at the time of subdivision or development. Finding:The applicant has included an impact study as required and has demonstrated to the satisfaction of City of Tigard Engineering staff that there will be no increased impact upon the transportation, sewer, stormwater or water systems, and it will positively improve the City's level of service with regard to the provision of developed parkland. No additional right-of-way dedications are required of this project. Additionally City of Tigard Engineering staff indicated that no TDT payment is required, and therefore, there is no mitigated or unmitigated impact on the street system. AC. Traffic study. 1. A traffic study shall be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances: a. When they generate a 10% or greater increase in existing traffic to high collision intersections identified by Washington County. b. Trip generations from development onto the City street at the point of access and the existing ADT fall within the following ranges: Existing ADT ADT to be added by development 0-3,000 vpd 2,000 vpd 3,001-6,000 vpd 1,000vpd _>6,000 vpd 500 vpd or more S7.R21112-000i13 jack Park Trail&TVI+&R Parking Modification MAGI?27 OF 34 • • c. If any of the following issues become evident to the City Engineer: (1) High traffic volumes on the adjacent roadway that may affect movement into or out of the site; (2) Lack of existing left-turn lanes onto the adjacent roadway at the proposed access drive(s); (3) Inadequate horizontal or vertical sight distance at access points; (4) The proximity of the proposed access to other existing drives or intersections is a potential hazard; (5) The proposal requires a conditional use permit or involves a drive-through operation; (6)The proposed development may result in excessive traffic volumes on adjacent local streets. 2. In addition, a traffic study may be required for all new or expanded uses or developments under any of the following circumstances: a. When the site is within 500 feet of an ODOT facility; and/or b. Trip generation from a development adds 300 or more vehicle trips per day to an ODOT facility; and/or c. Trip generation from a development adds 50 or more peak hour trips to an ODOT facility. Finding: The limited trail and bridge improvements are not anticipated to attract a significant number of new users of the park from outside the immediate neighborhood. The ITE Trip Generation Manual has limited information given for parks, especially small neighborhood parks,and City of Tigard engineering staff did not find a traffic study necessary. This project is designed to encourage increased pedestrian activity. This criterion does not apply. 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage,water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development traversed by a watercourse, or drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. Finding: No easements are required, since no new utilities are proposed with this application. This criterion does not apply. B. Utility easements.A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with the City,the applicable district and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The City's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or City Engineer. Finding: All utilities necessary to service the project site are available without the need to create new easements. This criterion does not apply. 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks.All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along at least one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. Finding:A sidewalk exists along the project site's frontage with SW Walnut Street in compliance with this provision. This criterion is met. SLR2012-XXX)3 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 28 OF 34 411 0 B. Requirement of developers. 1. As part of any development proposal, or change in use resulting in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day, an applicant shall be required to identify direct, safe (1.25 x the straight line distance) pedestrian routes within 1/2 mile of their site to all transit facilities and Neighborhood Activity Centers (schools,parks,libraries, etc.). In addition, the developer may be required to participate in the removal of any gaps in the pedestrian system off-site if justified by the development. Finding: The proposed site improvements to add a trail and bridge to connect an existing park with an existing fire station community room is anticipated to have minimal additional traffic generation, far below the 1,000 vehicle trip threshold.. As no development is proposed other than minor site improvements, the proportionality to require off-site pedestrian improvements with this approval is not met. This standard does not apply. 2. If there is an existing sidewalk, on the same side of the street as the development,within 300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality (even if the sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center). Finding: There are no sidewalk or street improvements proposed with this project as a continguous sidewalk exists along the entire block frontage on the same side of the street as the proposed project. This criterion does not apply. C. Planter strip requirements.A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions exist: there is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; it would conflict with the utilities, there are significant natural features (large trees,water features, significant habitat areas, etc) that would be destroyed if the sidewalk were located as required, or where there are existing structures in close proximity to the street (15 feet or less).Additional consideration for exempting the planter strip requirement may be given on a case-by-case basis if a property abuts more than one street frontage. Finding:A planter strip exists along the site's frontage with SW Walnut Street in compliance with this provision. This criterion is met. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: Sanitary sewer exists within SW Walnut Street along the frontage, and no modifications regarding sanitary sewer service are proposed or required. This standard is met. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The Director and City Engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff have been made, and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and SLR2012-00(X)3 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parkinr Modification PAGE 29 OF 34 • 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. Finding: The majority of the site will remain as pervious landscaping,resulting in very little storm water from the proposed trail leaving the site.The limited impervious surfaces will flow to adjacent pervious surfaces to reduce runoff capacity. Water quality treatment of runoff generated by the trail improvements will be provided by sheet flow across vegetation within the vegetated corridor, similar to a filter strip. As the area of new impervious surface is relatively small, payment of fee-in-lieu for water quality treatment will be collected as part of the sitework permit to construct the project. This criterion is met. C.Accommodation of upstream drainage.A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area,whether inside or outside the development, and: 1. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Finding: This project would replace an existing culvert with a bridge of sufficient height and sufficient clearance to accommodate anticipated storm events. This criterion is satisfied.. D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Finding: There should be no additional runoff from the site. The minor trail and bridge improvements will produce very little additional drainage. This criterion does not apply. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1. As a standard,bike lanes shall be required along all arterial and collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements along collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. Finding: The adjacent frontage of Walnut Street is classified as an Arterial Street, and code-required bike lanes already exist. This application does not propose any street improvements. The provisions of section 18.810 do not apply. 18.810.120 Utilities A. Underground utilities.All utility lines including,but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground... Finding: There are no new utilities proposed for this site, and utilities have been previously undergrounded with past improvements to SW Walnut Street. This criterion does not apply. SLR2012-0O003 Jack Park'frail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 30 OF 34 • • SECTION V. OTHER CITY STAFF COMMENTS The City of Tigard Building Official, Police Department, and Engineering Department were invited to review the proposal and did not respond. SECTION VI. AGENCY COMMENTS The following agencies were invited to comment on the project and did not respond: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife, and the US Army Corps of Engineers. The Oregon Department of State Lands, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, and Washington County and Clean Water Services submitted written comments on the proposal. Copies of the complete letters are found in the case file. All comments have been forwarded to the applicant and are summarized below with a planning staff response. Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue and Washington County reviewed the project and had no objections to it. Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) submitted a Wetland Land Use Notification Response, marked DSL File Number WN2012-0228 and dated December 18, 2012. In the response it was noted that DSL does not have a wetland delineation report for this site, requested a wetland delineation report if needed, restated the requirement for a permit from DSL for cumulative fill or annual excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in wetlands and below the ordinary high water line of Krueger Creek, and stated a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may be required. Staff Response: According to the grading plan submitted with the application (Sheets L5.1 & 5.2), no grading will occur within the wetlands or below the normal high water line. In water work is restricted to the removal of a culvert, and as noted above is considered restoration work and would disturb less than 1 cubic yard of material. The work is not expected to require a permit, but to account for potential revisions or unknown future determinations by the state, a condition of approval will been added requiring the applicant to present a copy of any DSL or USAGE project authorization permits required for work within the creek and wetlands. Clean Water Services also provided comments in a memorandum dated December 19, 2012. In the memorandum they requested a condition of approval be added requiring the applicant to obtain a Storm Water Connection Permit prior to any work on site. The purpose of this request is to ensure the project complies with all requirements of the Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards. Staff Response: In response this request, a condition of approval has been added requiring the applicant to present all project authorization permits required by Clean Water Services prior to any work being conducted on the site. Condition: Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard Planning Division a copy of all applicable U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon Department of State Lands, and Clean Water Services project authorization permits. SECTION VII. COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET The Tigard Community Development Code requires that property owners within 500 feet of the subject site be notified of the proposal, and be given an opportunity for written comments and/or oral testimony prior to a decision being made. Staff received two written comments from nearby property owners. Copies of the complete letters are found in the case file. Dyke Cullum & Cathy Hearn, residents and owners of 12770 SW Blue Heron Place, submitted an email SLR2012-410003 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 31 OF 34 • • on December 12,2012. In the email they expressed support for the project. Ruth Donovan,resident and property owner at 12480 SW Brook Court, sent a letter dated December 17, 2012. In the letter she complains about a bug infestation as a result of blackberry removal in the park, expressed opposition to the City's decision to invest in restoration work rather than playground equipment, and requested the construction of a six or seven foot wooden fence to be sprayed with insecticide often. The purpose of the fence would be to keep out insects, animals, and provide security from strangers. Staff Response: Staff has examined the issue and the project area is approximately 250 feet from Ms. Donovan's dwelling.The restoration work mentioned in the letter is not a part of this project and is exempted from land use review. The trail,bridge, and parking lot improvements are not likely to result in any new pedestrians or park users to be directly adjacent her house as the nearest trail will remain approximately 250 feet to the southwest. As discussed above,Chapter 18.745 does not require screening of park uses from adjacent residential land uses. Her concern is noted,but the application meets all approval criteria. SECTION VIII. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was posted at City Hall and mailed to: X The applicant and owners X Owner of record within the required distance X Affected government agencies Final Decision: THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON JANUARY 31,2013 AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON FEBRUARY 13,2013 UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED. Appeal: The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative Appeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with standing as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.040.G.2. Of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the decision was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard,Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decision shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties during the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appeal may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure that may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. T THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IS AT 4:30 PM ON FEBRUARY 13,2013. SLR20 1 2-0 0110 3 Jack Park frail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 32 01 34 • • Questions: If you have any questions, please contact Associate Planner John Floyd at the City of Tigard Planning Division, Tigard City Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard, Tigard, Oregon at (503) 718-2429 or johnfl(aitigard- or.gov. January 31,2013 P D BY: John Floyd DATE Associate Planner SLR2012-1KK03 Jack Park Trail&TVF&R Parking Modification PAGE 33 OF 34 I_ N O Map eF1� QQQOQQ R-12 o Zoning OD 000 e rl `►•i••, Legend .: e••-•-•••1•-•••-•1•••-•-•-••i111,... Subject Site •♦•••••••••••••••••••1•'•. W ►••••••••/••/••//••/••••• Zoning Classifications rH•1••••••••.1/•/•.••/•1N►////•/11••11.1.1.1.1•/•1• ! R-1 30,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size r •-•-1••1-1• • •• • •-•-O•OOO-•�•-O•• • 1••••O�••• • — _. _ R-2 20,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size A. e••••••••••••••••••••••••♦• 1••••1-•••••••••-•1•-•••••-•••-•••••••••••••••••-•• T—.--i R-3.5 10,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size \\ ^ r••••••••••••••••••••••••1 Ary •••/•/1/••11•/•////1•/•11• '� I,- R-4.5 7,500 Ft Min Lot Size 11•./1/11•.1//11/1///1.//• at a 0•••11.1••111.1••11••••11•4 R-7 5,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size • •1/11//1.1••/1./•///11//•♦ •►•••-•-•-•-•1•-•-•••-•-•••-•-•••-•••••-•-•••••••-•••x (---;R-12 3,050 Sq Ft Min Lot Size e-•••••••-•-•••-1-•-•-•-•••-•-•-•-••••••1-•-•-•••-•-•• 1•••••••••••••••••••••••••. C_J R-25 1,480 Sq Ft Min Lot Size 1..— /- �••••1•••••••••-•••-•-•••••••1•••••••••-•1.1•••-•••••� [j R-40 40 Units Per Acre �.!•1/11.1111-•1••/1.1/•••1••/•1.1/•1/1.1/11.1/•1.1••1•• W I MUR-1 Mixed Use Residential e••1•••••/•••••••-•-•1-1.1•-•-•-•-•1•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•••1� MUR-2 Mixed Use Residential2 1/•••1/••••//•/•••••/••/•//• > •••/••••••••/•••/•••/••••••1 H•••••1.11/11.111111/••11•• //1.1/••///•••//••////•/•.••� Q _MU-CBD Mixed Use Central Bus Dist mt _=11 C-G General Commercial R-4 •/1.1••.1•//1.•/•..••/•..1.1 = �C-C Community Commercial .......-•... ._ 11••••1.1/1/111/•-••1.1/111•••1.11••1-•1••1.1.1•-•�1•11-� H s 1.�r•11••_�1�•+1-1.•./.1.1.-'--.=-.::::�:1�•�•��1�1�1�•�•�1�re/�/�-�-�•=�•:�.�:•�.� N C-N Neighborhood Commercial /./1•/P1'vw/•... I• �11/1.1/111•/•1-11••1�•1-1-1•••/•111•-�•••1-:: I =C-P Proiesslonal Commercia I r•/1/•/••/••••1.••1//•11•♦♦♦•1/ MUC Mixed Use Commercial NJ r•.•1/•///•••1/••••V.*•••••// MUC-t Mixed Use Commercial1 r ►•••/.1.1•••1.1.1••••••••••1••••••••1•,••••1•••1.1••1• I 1 2 -MUE Mixed Use Empoloyment •/•••11.11111.1•••///•1••••.• ,I e••••••••••••••••/•••••/••••• ►••//••/••/••••••••••�•••1••♦ MUE-1 Mixed Use Employment1 F MARIE CT MUE-2 Mixed Use Employment W ►1•••••1••1•/•/1/1/'•ie/••••11• 2 tr ►-1•.1••O.•••O•••❖OOOOO-/•-0101001-0••••-1i I-L Light Industrial ►••-•/.1••/./•••••/.1.1•••-•-•1.1•�•1.1•••1.1•••/•-••4 i_.__. ►•••j••••%•••/•j••••••1•�1••1•-11.11�11.1•••11•11••1/1•. I-P Industrial Perk 1.•1.•••••/1//11//1•/1/////1 /.1•••••-•-•••-•••-.1./-•1•••-•1•••1•••-•/•1.1.••/•y `I-H Haavy Industrial • i �/11•••1•//••f•/11//•1/••/•1A 1 /•1•/•••••••/-1••/1•••/4'/•/•••••/•••1/••••-••••-//••••i Washington County •1.1.11.1//P•//.1//1•/.1.1/.- /•••/.////•0///••••///•••••♦ 1.•/•/•1/•/••1••/•1/•/•••//•. Overla Zones _a r//••/••••••.••••//•1.///••/•/ y r1.111/•111-1•/-/1.1/-1 /-/1/1/-/1/1.1/•/11•1•/•1••-11� KA Historic District Overlay III 7/••11/1//11/•11•/•11•••./1•. ///////.//•/•H11/•/.11.//// :;]Planned Development Overlay •/1/•/1111/r•/1//1//1/////1/♦ • •.1•//.//1/•1.1•••11/1••/1// ♦.111111.1•/•1•/•/.1/•••11•� Map Printed:08-Det-12 /'/• 1//1.1.1.1.1.1.1/•%•/�11 INFORMATION ON THIS MAP IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY AND SMOLLO BE VERIREO Yam IRE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES N. _. ' WALNUT $T� icy )/ /.// CONTENT ru£r IOA FNESE ONCCM OATS IS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.M CITY OF SWARD WTION.OR GLMMNTEE AS TO TUE CONTENTACCVMCE RN sEeeTY fTamaeSHAL pSUMOfME // [NSA FROVIGEO XEREM TIE OILY Of TGA peoc00 ASSUME NO USSQ % i` � 0EO REAAMLOSS SF HOCV+OCA srISS,IN ME COMMUNIT"DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Iv OK �� Fk r Ii \ 'A Place to COS Home" n f ilet 11 I 1K 0 City of Tigard Ejl .325_ W R 2�•ij�� wAQD QS 1al a,,O Nal Asa y A� b` �� r Ma gare,OR97223 ��_. _.a r 5038394171 SCC . I I . — y <., Y.w..rigamor.9w LN A REQUEST FOR COMMENTS • • ' : " City ofTigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DA I'L: December 6.2012 TO: Affected Agency FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: John Floyd.Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2429 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email: johnfl@tigard-or.gov SLR2012-00003/MMD2012-00021/SGN2012-00156/TRE2012-00026 -JACK PARK SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW & TVF&R FIRE STATION PARKING LOT MODIFICATION - REQUEST: The Applicant seeks approval to develop an unimproved section of Jack Park and TVF&R Fire Station 50. The project includes Sensitive Lands Review for the development of an ADA accessible trail, including an engineered bridge span across Krueger Creek, to connect the existing park area to the existing community room and parking lot at the fire station; a minor modification to the TVF&R Fire Station 50 Conditional Use Permit to remove one parking stall to accommodate an ADA accessible trail entrance into Jack Park; and a tree removal permit to allow the removal of nine trees to accommodate the trail. Associated with the project are a new entry sign for Jack Park, enhancements to Krueger Creek, and associated riparian area restoration. LOCATION: 12420 SW 127th Avenue (Jack Park) & 12617 SW Walnut (TVF&R Fire Station 50); Washington County Tax Map 2S104AA, Lot 04600, and Tax Map 2S104AD, Lots 4500 & 4501. ZONE: R-4.5 Low Density Residential District. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330.020.C; 18.360.090; 18.510.030; 18.510.050; 18.745; 18.765.030-040; 18.765.070; 18.775.020; 18.775.050; 18.775.070; 18.780.130; & 18.790.050.. Attached are the Vicinity Map, Zoning Map, and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR, COMMENTS BACK BY: MONDAY.DECEMBER 24.2012. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your comments. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact John Floyd at 503-718-2429 or johnfl a,tigard-or.gov. PLEASE CIIECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below. Name &Number of Person(s)Commenting: L L- 4 Lr 0 132ND AVE L t' '--• L L- 112N — s� i L L `• L- r L 4 I. L L `, '• L. L L ti` L >L ii, •II: ; L 37S 'TAVr- ` 4 ALL L GAARDE S i L" y 1,. I-- L.—_ • L- ," 4, "L_ 4,_ L L ' L �— . - • 129TH PL L,Z- _ L-L_ —L L-•� 4 L:.. VIVA L N U i S - 1_1___ •c L L_ I ! I- L L L 4- L `� L L_ c�t 128 (r. ~' L L t AVE LL L-L_ LL- l.. l. 1. � � ` D S 1..-._ I,_ L_� � f c i f _ ; 1• . E L- � , ` L .\ 4_a~ L- 1. -, 0 ALL L_ � SEVILLA AVE � •v... % ` 1 �7 ;~' JL L..r�` — i L LL L �a.�.. '� . ;. L �.�. u L. 1#, t ► ; 4 ';`* ►+� +'� L`-- L �. lam- L__ _ L- L- L- L L . L 4_ , I— :,. L \ L L" L_L_ L L_ 125TH AVE .} L �L I- �" , �, . • . - L L � -.- L L ,-,1 L L. L vfaT ti 12 3RD AVE" L. — > lc L_ LL" ; Z r �� _ W4 Z • .w m L,. '-L . I- 7 L- 1 L L Lam- ` I 1/4, Li.. L ' - 11. L 1 — 1 - ` 1z��fl1AV L 1` LANSDQWNL LN E °. _ • L L. i L L- ~' , L. L 1 I _ ti_ L- L- Y L L L_ t 4 L. r- • • I �� 0 d Zoning Map 8F<< Cr �9000 RR-12 ,cr.:, / . ♦p♦'♦♦•'t':0•.. ULJOQ� ►♦♦♦• Legend ♦""""'♦� ll '. Subject Site A♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦s ,. 1♦i'♦'♦'i'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'i'.'♦'♦''♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'.'♦'♦'♦'♦4 Zoning Classifications *ill Q r♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� I R-1 30,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size Ilk •""""""♦""♦""'♦• I R-2 20,000SgFt Min Lot Size N. ►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦'♦'♦♦•'♦'♦♦♦♦♦'♦♦•'♦'♦♦•'•'♦♦♦♦� I R-3.5 10,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size ^ r♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦♦'♦♦♦'♦'♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦• 4 R-4.5 7,500 Sq Ft Min Lot Size r♦♦'•♦♦'•'•♦♦'♦♦'♦'•♦♦♦♦'♦'♦'•'♦'•'•'♦•♦♦'•'•♦♦♦• 4 1 R-7 5,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Size ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• 7 ] R-12 3,OSOSgFt Min Lot Size •♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦i R-25 1,480 Sq Ft Min Lot Size �O'♦'♦♦♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦♦♦O'♦'♦'O♦DODO'♦'♦'O♦OO'♦O� R-40 40 Units Per Acre ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦, -' MUR-1 Mixed Use Residential 1 ♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦O'♦♦♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦O♦♦♦♦'♦• - _. .: MUR-2 Mixed Use Residential 2 411 ►♦♦♦♦♦♦j♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� Q Egg MU-CBD Mixed Use Central Bus Dist ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦ C-C Community Commercial R-4.5;♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦.. •-•:•-•-•••1.4.41M_ ►♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦O'♦'♦'♦O'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦'♦'♦''♦'♦'♦'♦� 1— C-G General Commercial • - ♦-♦-♦.•�� _ N I I C-N Neighborhood Commercial I �""♦ " ♦'♦♦PT"w ' AWA! _ C-P Professional Commercial ♦'♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦♦""'♦"l�4 MUC Mixed Use Commercial i �'•♦i'0000•11•'i'D O O�O' OOODOODOO•• ♦'4 ►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ MUC-1 Mixed Use Commercial Q ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• ,, ',J MUE Mixed Use Empoloyment _ ►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ 11111.1 MUE-1 Mixed Use Employment 1 t— MARIE CT •♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ •♦♦♦♦♦♦' ►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦:.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ -I ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦'.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• _ MUE-2 Mixed Use Employment 2 e' • ♦••♦♦♦'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦'♦'♦�'♦'♦O'♦♦♦'♦'••♦''• R�7 2 I-L Light Industrial 1111 ■ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦ I-P Industrial Park . ♦'♦'♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦♦♦j♦i♦♦'♦♦♦'♦'♦'♦♦♦♦j'♦'♦'♦'♦'♦♦j4A I-H Heavy Industrial ♦♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦♦♦��'♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦•♦♦♦♦ Washington County \ ♦♦♦♦♦`♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦'♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦* ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ 4 Overlay Zones r'♦'♦'♦'♦O'i'♦♦i0'♦'♦'i•i'i♦i'i'i'i'i♦i♦i'i'i'♦'♦'i'i'i pt/!Historic District Overlay All _._.._.__ ►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦••♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� Planned Development Overlay ►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• , ►♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦+♦♦•♦♦♦♦�♦•i : / Map Pfinted'06-Dec-12 �-♦••A'�♦�♦�'�♦♦•♦•♦•♦+►•♦•♦•♦♦ �•♦♦ INFORMATION ON THIS MAP IS=OR GE NERAL LOCATION 111°114 ONLY AND SHOULD SE VERIFIED MATH THE DEVELOPMENT WALNUT STsrevwes Jm sloN, DATAIS DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES,THEE CITY OF TONED / LMKES NOT WARRANTY REPRESENTATION.OR GUARANTEE A6 TO THE CJNTENT.ACCURACY.TIMELINESS OR COMPLEre.: G AH S6 OF ANY CF THE SATAPT FORAN ERRO T, MISSOFS,OR INACCUACIFAI TO USABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS,OMISSIONS,OR INACCURACIES IN THE �� INFORMATION PROVIDED REGARDLESS OF HOW rS=O. a Ri /Q � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT J 11 �p� "A Place to Call Home.. / City of Tigard t j� :730 � ) TjGAR� ep5139 rd,OR9l6lvd4 ILL , .��iiilll�� 'A^ TI ard,OR97223 ■2 �` a /� M 503 639-4171 r n R o 1 �� 'W wtigartl-or SOT • CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR CENTS NSLi cO J� ��FIGTIDN LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY FILE NAME: 4 FILE NOS.: /" CITY OFFICES _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/ ,CD Director DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/ /Arborlst PUBLIC WORKS/Mike Stone,City Engineer _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/ ,Asst.CD Director BUILDING DIVISION/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) _CITY ADMINISTRATION/Cathy Wheatley,City Recorder POLICE DEPARTMENT/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer _PLANNING COMMISSION(+12 sets) —DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Planning-Engineering Techs. PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Assistant PW Director _FILE/REFERENCE(+2 sets) —DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/ Development Eng. _PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Manager SPECIAL DISTRICTS _ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.i'TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT*'CLEAN WATER SERVICES* Planning Manager North Division Administrative Office Development Services Department 15707 SW Walker Road John Wolff,Deputy Fire Marshall 1850 SW 170t"Avenue David Schweitzer/SWM Program Beaverton,OR 97006 11945 SW 70th Ave Beaverton,OR 97006 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Tigard OR 97223-9196 Hillsboro,OR 97123 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON* _ CITY OF TUALATIN * XOR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE X OR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist Melinda Wood(WLUN Form Required) _ Steven Sparks,oev.Svcs.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 97301-1279 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 _ OR.PUB. UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING * _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM* 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland.OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. Joanna Mensher,Data Resource cemer(zcA-Adopted) XUS ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 _ Paulette Copperstone,(ZCA-RFC Only) _OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps A CWS Letter Only) _ O.Gerald Uba, Ph.D.,(cPAroCA/ZON) Mara Ulloa(Comp.Plan Amendments&Measure 37) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY* 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WAS' NGTON C. NTY* OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(PaweAnes in Area) _OR. DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers( Dept.o Land U.. &Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N. t • -nue _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350, 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hill boro y 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _ Na. i Vo.el-Beattie(General Apr Lake Oswego, OR 97034 _B nt Curti- (CPA) yOR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEQ) ODOT, REGION 1 * A essment a Te lion(ZCA)MS 9 _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential environmental Impacts) _Development Review Coordinator _Dona Mate e.Cartography RCA)MS 14 Planning Bureau Director Regional Administrator Cad Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) 1900 SW 41"Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 _OR.PARKS&REC.DEPT. _WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT,REGION 1-DISTRICT 2A* _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wacc%)""slry.enewieTowers) Chad Gordon,Assislant District Manager (Notify if ODOT R/R-Hwy Crossing Is Only Access to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,Sr.Crossing safety Specialist (Notify ifProperly Has HD overtay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street, NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner St.NE,Suite C Salem.OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell, President&General Manager 200 Hawthorne Avenue SE,Suite C320 Salem,OR 9 7301-52 94 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RIR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP. XI' T T IT PMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Gerald Backhaus es Mep for Area Contact) rol Isw Mile or nsu Route) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court en al in Proj I ner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 Hol da tree Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland, 232 _PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON _CENTURY INK Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. Right-of-Way Manager,OR&SW Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 8021 SW Capitol Hill Road Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J_BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland,Demographics Alex Silantiev(s..Map rw Area Cabot) Brian Every(Aap.uof4 1 o%'w) 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue,Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN SO0'OF THE SUIJECT PROPERTY FOR ANT/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Plainer Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). I:\CURPLN\Masten\Request For Comments Notification list.dac (UPDATED:Jul 11,2012) (o you update this roster,also update:I:1CURPLN\Masten\Request For Comments Notification Labels.doc)(This document is password protected.Please see Chris or Doreen it you need updates. Thank you.) • tl City ofTigard TIGARD REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DATE: December 6.2012 TO: Affected Agency FROM: City of Tigard Planning Division STAFF CONTACT: John Floyd,Associate Planner Phone: (503) 718-2429 Fax: (503) 718-2748 Email:johnfl@tigard-or.gov SLR2012-00003/MMD2012-00021/SGN2012-00156/TRE2012-00026 -JACK PARK SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW & TVF&R FIRE STATION PARKING LOT MODIFICATION - REQUEST: The Applicant seeks approval to develop an unimproved section of Jack Park and TVF&R Fire Station 50. The project includes Sensitive Lands Review for the development of an ADA accessible trail, including an engineered bridge span across Krueger Creek, to connect the existing park area to the existing community room and parking lot at the fire station; a minor modification to the TVF&R Fire Station 50 Conditional Use Permit to remove one parking stall to accotnrnodate an ADA accessible trail entrance into Jack Park; and a tree removal permit to allow the removal of nine trees to accommodate the trail. Associated with the project are a new entry sign for Jack Park, enhancements to Krueger Creek,and associated riparian area restoration. LOCATION: 12420 SW 127th Avenue (Jack Park) & 12617 SW Walnut (TVF&R Fire Station 50); Washington County Tax Map 2S104AA, Lot 04600, and Tax Map 2S104AD, Lots 4500 & 4501. ZONE: R-4.5 Low Density Residential District. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330.020.C; 18.360.090; 18.510.030; 18.510.050; 18.745; 18.765.030-040; 18.765.070; 18.775.020; 18.775.050; 18.775.070; 18.780.130; & 18.790.050.. Attached are the Vicinity Map, Zoning Map, and Applicant's Statement/Plans for your review. From information supplied by various departments and agencies and from other information available to our staff,a report and recommendation will be prepared and a decision will be rendered on the proposal in the near future. If you wish to comment on this application, WE NEED YOUR COMMENTS BACK BY: MONDAY,DECEMBER 24,2012. You may use the space provided below or attach a separate letter to return your continents. If you are unable to respond by the above date,please phone the staff contact noted above with your comments and confirm your comments in writing as soon as possible. If you have any questions, contact John Floyd at 503-718-2429 or johnflatigard-or.gov. PLF�ASE CHECK THE FOLLOWING ITEMS THAT APPLY: ✓_/ We have reviewed the proposal and have no objections to it. Please contact of our office. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Written comments provided below: Name&Number of Person(s) Commenting: J` ,M \\10k.q K1,51rd Val 50?) -11$ • 15 to • John Floyd From: HOWARD Heather<heather.howard@state.or.us> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:07 AM Subject: WLUN #2012-0228-DSL Response (City#SLR2012-00003) Attachments: WN2012-0228-Notice.pdf; WN2012-0228-Response.pdf We have completed our review of the Wetland Land Use Notification that was prepared for Steve Martin-City of Tigard. The WLUN form was submitted to the Department for review/response and given the file number WN2012- 0228. The results and conclusions from that review are explained in the attached pdf documents. If the attached documents are illegible or difficult to open, you may contact the Department and request paper copies. Otherwise, please review the attachments carefully and direct any questions or comments to Wetland Specialist, Caroline Stimson at(503)986- 5231. Thank you for your interest in the project. Wetlands Program Oregon Department of State Lands 775 Summer St. NE, Ste. 100 Salem, OR 97301-1279 Fax: (503) 378-4844 http://www.oregonstatelands.us 1 r ' • a of ° WETLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATION FORM Q ,:�,, ;y� OREGON DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS ��, to 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100, Salem, OR 97301-1279 • Phone (503) 986-5200 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS Forms are online at www.oregonstatelands.us This form is to be completed by planning department staff for mapped wetlands and waterways. Responsible Jurisdiction: city of Tigard staff contact: John Floyd, Associate Planner date: 12/06/2012 mailing address: City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd city: Tigard zip: 97223 phone: 503-718-2429 email: johnfl@tigard-or.gov Applicant: Steve Martin mailing address: City of Tigard Parks Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd city: Tigard state: OR zip: 97223 phone: email: STEVE@tigard-or.gov Property Owner: City of Tigard mailing address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd city: Tigard state: OR zip: 97223 phone: email: Activity Location: township: 2S range: 1w section: 04 quarter-quarter section: tax lot(s): 4500, 4501, 4600 street address: city: Tigard county: Washington adjacent waterway: Krueger Creek Site Information: required attachments with site marked- LWI/NWI, tax map and site plan(s). LWI Summary Sheet Unit A-10.pdf 2S104AD Tax Map.pdf Site Plan.pdf LU_appendC_SPL 12-001787_JackPark.pdf Proposed Activity: Local case file #: SLR2012-00003 zoning: R-4.5 ❑X site plan approval ❑X grading permit ❑X building permit (new structures) QX other Project description: The Applicant seeks approval to develop an unimproved section of Jack Park and TVF&R Fire Station 50. The project includes Sensitive Lands Review for the development of an ADA accessible trail, including an engineered bridge span across Krueger Creek, to connect the existing park area to the existing community room and parking lot at the fire station; a minor modification to the TVF&R Fire Station 50 Conditional Use Permit to remove one parking stall to accommodate an ADA accessible trail entrance into Jack Park; and a tree removal permit to allow the removal of nine trees to accommodate the trail. Associated with the project are a new entry sign for Jack Park, enhancements to Krueger Creek, and associated riparian area restoration. r f • • � F WETLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATION RESPONSE � OREGON DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS ¢ ; :' �';�� 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100, Salem, OR 97301-1279 IF,: bap iaz/ Phone (503) 986-5200 "P'A"T' www.ore onstatelands.us OREGON DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS � 5ei DSL File Number: WN2012-0228 Cities and counties have a responsibility to notify the Department of State Lands (DSL) of certain activities proposed within wetlands mapped on the Statewide Wetlands Inventory. John Floyd from city of Tigard submitted a WLUN pertaining to local case file #:SLR2012-00003. Activity location: township: 02S range: 01W section: 04 quarter-quarter section: tax lot(s): 4500, 4501, 4600 street address: city: Tigard county: Washington latitude: 45.4286 longitude: -122.8065 Mapped wetland/waterway features: D The local wetlands inventory shows a wetland/waterway on the property. ❑X The county soil survey shows hydric (wet) soils on the property. Hydric soils indicate that there may be wetlands. Oregon Removal-Fill requirement (s): ❑X A state permit is required for 50 cubic yards or more of removal and/or fill in wetlands, below ordinary high water of streams, within other waters of the state, or below highest measured tide where applicable. Your activity: Contacts: For permit information and requirements contact DSL Resource Coordinator (see website for current list) htta:l/www.oregonstatelands.us/DSLlcontacLus_lirectory.shtml#Wetlands _Waterways For wetland delineation report requirements and information contact DSL Wetlands Specialist (see website for current list) fittp://www.oregonstatelands.us/DSLlconta us directory.shtml#WetlandsWaterways For removal-fill permit and/or wetland delineation report fees go to http:l/www.oregon.gov/DSL/PERMITS/docslrf fees.pdf A permit may be required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (503-808-4373). ❑K This is a preliminary jurisdictional determination and is advisory only. Comments: It appears from the submitted site plan that the project area has been delineated. DSL does not have a wetland delineation report for this site. Please submit the wetland delineation report for a jurisdictional determination if needed. A state permit is required for cumulative fill or annual excavation of 50 cubic yards or more in wetland and below the ordinary high water line of Krueger Creek. • CleanWater Services MEMORANDUM Date: December 19, 2012 To: John Floyd,Associate P1 er, City of Tigard From: Jackie Sue Humphreys lean Water Services (the District) Subject: Jack Park& TVF&R Parking Modification, SLR2012-00003/MMD2012-00021, 2S104AA04600, 2S104AD04500, 04501 Please include the following comments when writing your conditions of approval: PRIOR TO ANY WORK ON THE SITE A Clean Water Services(the District) Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization must be obtained. Application for the District's Permit Authorization must be in accordance with the requirements of the Design and Construction Standards, Resolution and Order No. 07-20, (or current R&O in effect at time of Engineering plan submittal), and is to include: a. Detailed plans prepared in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 2.04.2.b-1. b. Detailed grading and erosion control plan. An Erosion Control Permit will be required. Area of Disturbance must be clearly identified on submitted construction plans. If site area and any offsite improvements required for this development exceed one-acre of disturbance,project will require a 1200-CN Erosion Control Permit. c. Detailed plans showing the development having direct access by gravity to public storm and sanitary sewer. d. Provisions for water quality in accordance with the requirements of the above named design standards. Water Quality is required for all new development and redevelopment areas per R&O 07-20, Section 4.05.5, Table 4-1. Access shall be provided for maintenance of facility per R&O 07-20, Section 4.02.4. e. If use of an existing offsite or regional Water Quality Facility is proposed, it must be clearly identified on plans, showing its location,condition, capacity to treat this site and, any additional improvements and/or upgrades that may be needed to utilize that facility. 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Phone: (503)681-3600 • Fax: (503)681-3603 • cleanwaterservices.org • • • f. If private lot LIDA systems proposed, must comply with the current CWS Design and Construction Standards. A private maintenance agreement, for the proposed private lot LIDA systems, needs to be provided to the City for review and acceptance. g. Show all existing and proposed easements on plans. Any required storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water quality related easements must be granted to the City. h. Site contains a"Sensitive Area." Applicant shall comply with the conditions as set forth in the Service Provider Letter No. 12-001787, dated September 13, 2012. i. Clean Water Services shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying storm and surface water management to Clean Water Services that would prevent the owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. j. Detailed plans showing the sensitive area and corridor delineated, along with restoration and enhancement of the corridor. k. Provide DSL and Corps of Engineers permits for any work in the wetlands or creek prior to any on site work, including grading and erosion control. Include permit number on cover sheet of plans or provide concurrence with the delineation. 1. Any proposed offsite construction activities will require an update or amendment to the current Service Provider Letter for this project. CONCLUSION This Land Use Review does not constitute the District's approval of storm or sanitary sewer compliance to the NPDES permit held by the District. The District,prior to issuance of any connection permits, must approve final construction plans and drainage calculations. • John Floyd From: John Floyd Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:20 AM To: 'Dyke Cullum' Subject: RE: CASE ID #SLR2012-00003 (Jack Park Trail & Fire Station Parking Attachments: John Floyd.vcf Dear Dyke and Cathy, Thank you for the letter of support. The announcement you received is part of the environmental permitting for the new improvements. This is required by local, state,and federal regulations. Construction is planned for 2013 once the weather dries out,so your wait shouldn't be too much longer. As for the trees being removed. Most tree removal is occurring near the creek in order to create room the for the new trail and bridge. Two apples trees next to the fire station parking lot are being removed as part of the project. Are these the trees you are referring to? Both were evaluated by an arborist and found to have poor structure, with one in very poor health. Their removal is necessary in order to accommodate the new trail meeting the standards of the Americans with Disability Act. In plain language,we don't want to make the trail too steep. I hope this helps. If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to write or call. Regards, John Floyd John Floyd City of Tigard Associate Planner Community Development fa 111111 15031718-2429 Johnfl@tigard-or.gov 13125 SW Hall Blvd From: Dyke Cullum [mailto:cullum3@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:08 PM To: John Floyd Subject: CASE ID #SLR2012-00003 (Jack Park Trail & Fire Station Parking Dear John, Cathy and I got this announcement of the land review today and after reading it over, our position is: What are you waiting for? We had always wondered why it had not been done.... We support the project 100% and if I can help in any way, I would be glad to do so.... PS we assume the trees you will remove are the junk ones down by the river and not the great apple trees Those have to stay... Regards, 1 Dyke Cullum & Cathy Hearn 111 12770 SW Blue Heron Place Tigard, OR. 97223 503-975-0926 As people do better, they start voting like Republicans -- unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing. Karl Rove 2 • John Floyd From: Dyke Cullum <cullum3@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:08 PM To: John Floyd Subject: CASE ID#SLR2012-00003 (Jack Park Trail & Fire Station Parking Dear John, Cathy and I got this announcement of the land review today and after reading it over, our position is: What are you waiting for? We had always wondered why it had not been done.... We support the project 100% and if I can help in any way, I would be glad to do so.... PS we assume the trees you will remove are the junk ones down by the river and not the great apple trees.....Those have to stay... Regards, Dyke Cullum & Cathy Hearn 12770 SW Blue Heron Place Tigard, OR. 97223 503-975-0926 As people do better, they start voting like Republicans -- unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing. Karl Rove i • John Floyd From: Naomi Vogel <Naomi_Vogel©co.washington.or.us> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 2:07 PM To: John Floyd Subject: RE: Attached Image Hello John The county does not have any requirements for city casefile SLR2012-00003. Thank you Naomi From: OPSINSPECTIR@co.washington.or.us [mailto:OPSINSPECTIR@co.washington.or.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:58 PM To: Naomi Vogel Subject: Attached Image A WETLAND LAND USE NOTIFICATION FORM """' \_(' OREGON DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS ° �oe. 775 Summer Street NE, Suite 100, Salem, OR 97301-1279 . Phone (503) 986-5200 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF STATE LANDS Forms are online at www.oregonstatelands.us This form is to be completed by planning department staff for mapped wetlands and waterways. Responsible Jurisdiction: city of Tigard staff contact: John Floyd, Associate Planner date: 12/06/2012 mailing address: City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd city: Tigard zip: 97223 phone: 503-718-2429 email: johnfl@tigard-or.gov Applicant: Steve Martin mailing address: City of Tigard Parks Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd city: Tigard state: OR zip: 97223 phone: email: STEVE@tigard-or.gov Property Owner: City of Tigard mailing address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd city: Tigard state: OR zip: 97223 phone: email: - Activity Location: township: 2S range: 1w section: 04 quarter-quarter section: tax lot(s): 4500, 4501, 4600 street address: city: Tigard county: Washington adjacent waterway: Krueger Creek Site Information: required attachments with site marked- LWI/NWI, tax map and site plan(s). LWI Summary Sheet Unit A-10.pdf 2S104AD Tax Map.pdf Site Plan.pdf LU_appendC_SPL 12-001787_JackPark.pdf Proposed Activity: Local case file #: SLR2012-00003 zoning: R-4.5 ❑K site plan approval ❑X grading permit ▪ building permit (new structures) ▪ other r • INV Project description: The Applicant seeks approval to develop an unimproved section of Jack Park and TVF&R Fire Station 50. The project includes Sensitive Lands Review for the development of an ADA accessible trail, including an engineered bridge span across Krueger Creek, to connect the existing park area to the existing community room and parking lot at the fire station; a minor modification to the TVF&R Fire Station 50 Conditional Use Permit to remove one parking stall to accommodate an ADA accessible trail entrance into Jack Park; and a tree removal permit to allow the removal of nine trees to accommodate the trail. Associated with the project are a new entry sign for Jack Park, enhancements to Krueger Creek, and associated riparian area restoration. r • /ik a). -°x 4 ink 1p 4,.1_ (7 1a _. .'i..aft. 1?1.-14-L1. c4 , g - . 14t c Cal:eta / cv: dC,>/z .,& rr !� 1 .8eeao+f w ILL/ .- -.--__... .._.J 66 77.K�/j�� yljti / q2i; cum G'►'L- 4,4 R �LT C .LC.t.,lo( o L ,1,4 l ..0_ ir,i_,t ,eqtH ` ...`1- ,c-I2e-- .r ' • V /21—ex44. C -y /lt—ece:_e•{t-s, �J2c.ti r r' cz, of, f 1- yyy I i /f7 , J9f 4 .Z Cry - .4rzet-yirz,-3 day_ rG k r/ . . -y nh �- u u�� Q ,hea_ Q . ' _0 -4 • 2,4 an-c_ //-,.0.7free // 4 / G'-�'� - �v Goo/ c . mo • w 1 1 i • : ., q Ruth Donovan l',.',T.1 C 0 ." , 12480 SW Brook Ct. '',:1', 1c)...,;.Li''.i,i',, l'i .: :;L:`,:,.. :1.::'. I.: .*Ilk 1-.2.';,• f'-,4 . ' ' . Tigard, OR 97223-3018, ' - D,F-f.- 2o-i;;?- • t.Li- :,- - . ; .v., . -- 'k S: 41, Atingthrou0 .--Y 5"ir (ter g \Z71(---jra 4474-.2 ... /ti / ‘1' 5 .)d Iv. dte( 4Zr-1 A fi. op. ,..,f7..•• 0-Le-1.-.) C2,-e7/ - '.41'2z5•-• S7223SiSSS9 IL1.1.1.1,1.1d.lhhillifilliiliiiiii iiiiiiitLii dill I, 1 MAILING / NOTIFICATION RECORDS • ■ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING IN C Tl GARD 1, Christine L. Wiley, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon and that I served the following: {l]eck 4ppmpnarc Box(s)Mow) ❑x NOTICE OF a TYPE II Decision FOR: Sensitive Lands Review,SLR 2012-00021/SGN2012- 00156/'IRE2012-0026 (Jack Park Trail&Fire Station Parking Lot Modification) NOTICE TO PRIVATE PARTIES 0 AMENDED NOTICE— x City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof,on January 31.2013,and deposited in the United States Mail on January 31,2013 postage prepaid. (Person that Pr ar Notice) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me on the day of A4M.it A— I ,2013. r� --- ( w.:i: OFFICIAL SEAL SHIRLEY I.TREAT (1 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.459846 ` MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 06.2016 O UVL t N TARY PUBL C OF OREG My Commission Expires: —11 • • Notice of a Type II Decision Sensitive Lands Review III IR T1GAlto Case ID: SLR2012-00003/MMD2012-00021/SGN2012- 00156/TRE2012-00026 (Jack Park Trail & Fire Station Parking Lot Modification) The Decision Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's des.„ ee has APPROVED the requested land use action, subject to certain conditions of approval. The fin. gs and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in the Final Decision and the proposal is described below. Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Thursday,January 31, 2013 120 days = Wednesday, March 13, 2013 Staff Contact: John Floyd 503-718-2429 Johnfl@tigard-or.gov Appeal Information All persons entitled to notice or who are otherwise adversely affected or aggrieved by the decision may appeal the decision. Appeal forms are available on the city's website or by person at the Permits Center. If you would like to appeal this land use decision, we need to receive your completed appeal form by 4 p.m. on Thursday, February 14, 2013. Please include the Case ID Number: SLR2012-00003. Please hand-deliver your completed appeal form (which will be time-stamped) and pay the associated appeal fees at the Permits Center, 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. If you have any questions regarding this decision please address them to the appropriate staff person noted on ttis form: John Floyd and note the Case ID Number: SLR2012-00003 This decision is final on Thursday,January 31, 2013, unless an appeal is filed. The decision will go into effect on Friday, February 15, 2013, unless an appeal is filed. A copy of the Final Decision is available upon request from the staff contact person noted above. Information About the Decision Applicant: City of Tigard Parks Division Owner: City of Tigard Description of the Proposal: The Applicant seeks approval to develop an unimproved section of Jack Park and TVF&R Fire Station 50. The project includes Sensitive Lands Review for the development of an ADA accessible trail, including an engineered bridge span across Krueger Creek, to connect the existing park area to the existing community room and parking lot at the fire station; a minor modification to the TVF&R Fire Station 50 Conditional Use Permit to remove one parking stall to accommodate an ADA accessible trail entrance into Jack Park; and a tree removal permit to allow the removal of nine trees to accommodate the trail. Associated with the project are a new entry sign for Jack Park, enhancements to Krueger Creek, and associated riparian area restoration. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg. 1 Legal TAX1PP 2S104AA,LOT 04600; 2S104AD,L.04500 &04501 Description: Zoning: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District Appeal Procedure Details The decision of the Director (Type II Procedure) or Review Authority (Type II Administrative ppeal or Type III Procedure) is final for purposes of appeal on the date that it is mailed. Any party with st.nding as provided in Section 18.390.040.G.1. may appeal this decision in accordance with Section 18.390.0'0.G.2. of the Tigard Community Development Code which provides that a written appeal together with the required fee shall be filed with the Director within ten (10) business days of the date the notice of the de•Sion was mailed. The appeal fee schedule and forms are available from the Planning Division of Tigard ity Hall, 13125 SW Hall Boulevard,Tigard, Oregon 97223. Unless the applicant is the appellant, the hearing on an appeal from the Director's Decisio shall be confined to the specific issues identified in the written comments submitted by the parties d ring the comment period. Additional evidence concerning issues properly raised in the Notice of Appe may be submitted by any party during the appeal hearing, subject to any additional rules of procedure th t may be adopted from time to time by the appellate body. The deadline for filing an appeal is 4 p.m. on Thursday,February 14,2013 Site Map 7 gj. -ad .., ,4 0 „A' S KAREN ST -k % " qe4icoK .440 - •+ 3S 4! ' ...<e„i a a ��„,,x�''T&� "2'd q wry A. �{ b = .,. 44 4...� 4.414 v17.4'f4Y.40 . inr Y • ft c '�. a 40 It 'd `teaz �01� •6 . w nip ¢'n. .,p Y YpsII - S to n ... n k . _ ,r 1V- Sala . Ali at '8 r, x" • A-BirRTA Sr Ai U Feet SOU la 4 ssat ikk City of Tigard,Community Development Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 pg.2 11e Avery®Template5161® i oCIRe a,.p 11Ed e AVERY®5961TM Use Ave " •dPaper expose Pop•EdgeTr" V 2S103BC09400 2S1038B05500 MEIKLE,COLLEEN JACKSON NORDWELL,STEVEN L&KATHLEEN V MEIKLE,FREDERICK C III 12450 SW 124TH AVE 12860 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC09100 2S104AD04200 MEIKLE,FREDERICK C III OLSON,DENNIS D MEIKLE,COLLEEN JACKSON 12540 SW WALNUT AVE 12860 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB05600 2S104AD04100 MINER,MARGARET K OLSON,DENNIS D& 12470 SW 124TH AVENUE BONNIE LOUISE TIGARD,OR 97223 12540 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01900 2S104AD03800 MONTOYA,ALICIA BOTTELO& OLSON,KATHLEEN A NIEVES,FIEDL MONTOYA 13660 SW ASH AVE 12625 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD04900 2S104AA00900 MOORE,CAROLYN REVOCABLE LIVING OLSON,SYLVIAATRUST BY HAUCK,TERRY C 12500 SW BELL CT 1211 SW 5TH AVE#1700 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S104AA02200 25104AD01700 MORLEY,JUDITH EVELYN ORNELAS,JEREMY&JENNIFER 12305 SW 127TH 12705 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA12100 25103BB01600 MORRISON,SAMUEL P&TRACI LEE OSWALD,JACK D AND %DICKSON,JACK A SALLY JOYCE 12505 SW 129TH AVE 12482 SW BROOK COURT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD00701 2S103BC04300 MURPHY,DENNIS D&MARY A PALMER,JACK 12750 SW MARIE CT 10626 SW BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 251035C04100 2S104AA13300 MURPHY,SHARON V PAUL,MATTHEW S 12470 SW WALNUT CHRISTENSEN,DAWN TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 25067 PORTLAND,OR 97298 2S104A003700 2S104AD02601 NESS,STEPHEN&JONA PETTERSON,THOMAS W/PAULINE M FA 12730 SW WALNUT ST THOMAS W/PAULINE M PETTERSEN TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 12921 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes peler ♦ I Repliez a la hachure af in de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY P. Dena along acne so I/�, AVERV05961TM Use Ave Tem late 5161® id Paper .��j expose PopaidgeM4 L Gretchen Buehnet Patty Newth 13249 SW 136th Place 12180 SW Merestone Court Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt Heidi Brenneman 13760 SW 121st Avenue 11680 SW Tigard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs'& Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114tI Place Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121 st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Shannen Williams Rappold Marketing/Business Development Manager Perin Construction 7190 SW Sandburg Street Portland, OR 97223 etiquette{I earsr er, � ((i ' fin de v Jtilisez le gabarit • L RY� T ,�NTEsenTs de clia�rSemeFillcurpinls'etup,lab r ve er e re -u TM UPD "- -AVE Y , g 1 P 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 . pPaper ..........y 11441C, eTrn AVERY®5961 Use Avery®Template 5161® F ,d ��■� u n4 expose Pop-/ -%ge 2S104AA02700 2S104AA02400 WEISS,STEVEN R&REBECCA M WYFFELS,HENRY R 12255 SW 126TH AVE 12265 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA13000 2S103BB03301 WILLIAMS,JERALD T/SHARON K YANDLE FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 12520 SW 128TH AVE BY JOHN C/HEATHER A YANDLE TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 2804 MISSION COLLEGE BLVD SANTA CLARA,CA 95054 2S103BC05001 2S103BB00700 WING LOUIE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNE YINGER FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST • PO BOX 86404 BY YINGER,KENT L&DEBORAH LYN TRS PORTLAND,OR 97206 12545 SW 124TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S103B805800 2S1036B01400 WINKLER,L DUANE/MARIE B ZAGORODNEY,WENDY M&DAVID L 12520 SW 124TH AVE 12476 BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05200 2S1038C09900 WINSTON,MARK ZAKRZEWSKI,CHAPIN ORR WINSTON,ZSUZSANNA 12785 SW BLUE HERON PL 17576 LAKE HAVEN DR TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO, 97035 2S104AA04900 WINSTON,MARK&ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE HAVEN RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S104AA05000 WINSTON,MARK&ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE HAVEN DR LAKE OSWEGO, 97035 25104AA 100 WINSTON, &ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE VEN DR LAKE OS G ,OR 97035 2S104A002600 WIRTHLIN,JOSEPH E 12919 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 25103BC08400 WOOD,JOANNE 12770 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 `_tlquettes faciles a peler A 1 Repiiez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Jtilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement reveler le rebord Po u TM 1 P- P 1-800-GO-AVERY "", '"' `�""' 1.1•1'I nem along une to 1//L��AVERY®5961 Tm " Use Avery®Template 51610 d Paper •��j expose PolVdgem 11C�1 2S104AA01700 25104 04501 SMITH,ROGER E&MELE K TIGARD, OF 12305 SW BELL CT 13125 SW LL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD R 7223 • 2S104AA04100 2S103BB06300 SPAULDING,CORAL TIGAR I OF 12670 SW KAREN ST 13125 SW LL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGAR OR 3 2S104AA05700 2S104AA04600 STEDMAN,HAL G JR&CATHERINE F TIGA ,CI OF 12740 SW WILLS PL 13125 S ALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD 7223 2S104AA00700 25104A000400 STONE,HARVEY L CAROL P TORRES,ROSENDO HERNANDEZ 12600 SW BELL COURT BOTELLO,MARIA ODILIA TIGARD,OR 97223 12755 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02300 25104A004500 STROUD,TERRY TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE BATTILEGA,STEPHANIE 20865 SW BLANTON ST 12285 SW 127TH AVE ALOHA,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA03800 2S104AA02100 SUTTON,UME S VANDERVORT,GERALD E AND SUTTON,STEPHEN N CARRIE L 12580 SW KAREN 12335 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AD01200 2S104AA00800 TAYLOR,JAMES D VANNICE-BARE,SARAH 12745 SW WALNUT ST 12550 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA00400 25104AA13700 THIES,JOHN A JR&JULIA M VENHEIM,JOHN K AND 12555 SW 127TH AVE LYNETTE E TIGARD,OR 97223 12300 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 25104 4400 2S104AA04700 TIGARD,C WATSON,MITCHELL F/MARY P 13125 SW H 29650 NW OLSON RD TIGARD,O 9 3 GASTON,OR 97119 2S104AA1 00 2S104AD02200 TIGARD,CI WEINEL,BRAD OWEN 13125 SW HA 12555 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,0 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etlquettes faciles paler ♦ I Repiiez a la hachure afin de www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY ""7``=' ' 1111111•IN I 'sena along rme to T„ Use Avery®Template 51610 �d Paper ��j expose Po.dgeTM /gip A� ®5961 2S104A004600 25104AA90091 PHAM,HAO D RUTLEDGE,JOEL WALTER NGUYEN,LAI T 14782 SW WOODHUE ST 16144 NW GILLIHAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97231 • 2S104AD02800 2S104AA03900 PHAM,HA D SAXMAN,J BROOKE III& NGUYEN, L T DEBORA 16144 NW IL AN RD 12640 SW KAREN PORTL D,OR 97231 TIGARD,OR 97223 25103BC10000 2S104AA04500 PLINSKI,CHRISTIE M SCHILLING,KENNETH L 12775 SW BLUE HERON PL DONNA M TIGARD,OR 97223 12400 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AD00600 25104AA12200 QUEAHPAMA, RALPH G&MICHELLE K SCHRADER,MARCUS J&ROBERTA L 12730 SW MARIE CT 12490 SW 129TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104A001500 2S103BB01200 RASMUSSEN,VENETA M& SCHREINER,STEVEN A AND PAUL VICTOR ANNE-LY 12755 SW 128TH 12425 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 251038C04200 2S104AD04300 RAU,JULIE M SEVERSON,EVERETT 0 12430 SW WALNUT ST BY DENNIS OLSON TIGARD,OR 97223 12540 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02000 25104A006000 RENDA,JOHN J SHELDON,CHARLOTTE M 12395 SW 127TH AVE 12932 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05400 2S1036C04900 ROBINSON, CRAIG W/DENISE E SHULTS,BRUCE L 12225 SW 127TH AVE 12625 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD00200 2S104AA01200 ROHR,RICHARD A SMITH,JANET C 1107 SITKA AVE 12350 SW BELL CT NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA04800 2S1038C09700 RUSSELL,DAVID E II&DENISE M SMITH,MARGARET M PO BOX 643 12885 SW BLUE HERON PL BEAVERTON,OR 97075 TIGARD,OR 97223 uettes faciles a peler A i Repllez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com itilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 i oen awny 1me co `mil AVERY®5961TM Use Avery®Template 51618 :v Paper ��l exposee POdgeTM V J 2510313801800 2S104AA01500 KEOUGH,DOUGLAS J AND MARSHA D LIVENGOOD,TERRY W&ROBERTA L 12475 SW BROOK CT 12255 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01100 2S104AD02000 KERR,LORI L LU,RANDY S/LORNA K 12760 SW 128TH AVE 12605 SW 128TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C03800 2S104AA03600 KESSLER,MARGUERITE E LYNCH,JEREMIAH J&ERIN J 12425 SW ALBERTA 12515 SW KAREN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S104AA12000 2S103BB06000 KIERNAN,JILL ANN MAAG,WAYNE H 12495 SW 129TH AVE AND ALTA L TIGARD,OR 97223 12580 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01600 2S1038C05002 KLEFFNER,THOMAS ANTHONY MAHONEY,ROBERT&ELAINE JNT LIV PERRI,FRANCIS TIMOTHY %EBNER,DARIUS WOLFGANG 4975 SW 65TH AVE 1260 12TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97221 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S103BB01000 2S1036B05900 KLEVE,RUSSELL C MANAHAN,WILLIAM D&CHARLENE A 12475 SW 124TH AVE 12550 5W 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA02600 2S104AA12900 KNIGHT,ROBERT W MATTHEWS,BRIAN&ANNE-MARIE 12665 SW KAREN ST 12515 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA13100 2S104AD03500 LARSEN,CHRISTINE J MCLEOD,JOYCE& 12500 SW 128TH AVE SAFFORD,AUDREY G TIGARD,OR 97223 229E WARREN COMMON FREMONT,CA 94539 2S103BC04600 2S1038C04500 LAWRENCE,JUSTIN MCLIT REAL ESTATE,LLC 19311 NE 101 ST AVE PO BOX 725 BATTLEGROUND,WA 98604 PROSSEN,WA 99350 2S104A003401 2S104AA01800 LEWIS FAMILY REV TRUST MEATH,SHAWN DANIEL BY LEWIS,BRIAN C&CHRISTINE C TR 12445 SW BELL CT 12828 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes faciles a peter ♦ Repliez a la hachure afro de www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY cmy reel- Lapels ® Bend along line to SAVE ,RY®5961"1 UseAver^7_Template 5161® I Paper j expose PopgeTM 2S103B603400 2S104AA12700 HARSHFIELD,RUTH A JACKSON,JEFFREY R 12505 SW KAREN ST 12455 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05800 2S104AA00200 HARSTAD,CHERYL L JACKSON,JOSEPH E&HEATHER L 12750 SW WILLS PL 12775 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S10313805700 2S104AD03501 HARTFIELD,LEE E AND APRIL L JAM,CHRISTOPHER M& 12500 SW 124TH GRAHAM,LAURA J TIGARD,OR 97223 12820 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C08500 2S103BC09800 HAWES,DIANE S JELINEK,GARY L REV LIV TRUST 12780 SW BLUE HERON PL 12805 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC09500 251038601300 HILL, LAWRENCE JOHNSON,ARIC STORY,DE ANN M 12405 SW 124TH AVE 12900 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA13500 2S104AD04000 HJORTH,RAMONA C JONES,DAVID R&AMY L 12360 SW 128TH 12570 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25103BB00900 2S104AD00300 HOLCOMB,FREDERICK P JONES,JAIMI SARA 12515 SW 124TH AVE 12775 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD05800 2S104AA01100 HOLM,RICHARD KEARNEY,JOSHUA L&STACEY L 12896 SW SEVILLA AVE 12400 SW BELL CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD02100 251036800500 HOPP,CARL W III KELLY,PATRICIA M&MARLEEN MARY HACKENMILLER,TIFFANY M 12565 SW 124TH 12585 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD04400 28104AA12300 ISAACSON,GARLA KEMPTER,ROBERT W JR AND 12520 SW WALNUT ST LYNN D TIGARD,OR 97223 12480 SW 129TH TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes faciles peler ♦ ; Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com ement Jtilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de charry 9 j reveler le rebord POPUPTM 1-BOO-GO-AVERY ay reer- LaoeIs A i�i Bend along line to Use Avery®Template 51610 •i Paper ® ' expose Po�'dgeTM �A�RY®5961TM J 2S103BC05003 2S103BC05004 EBNER,DARIUS FURST,EDGAR&ANNA LIVING TRUST 1260 12TH 13850 SW BONNIE BRAE CT WEST LINN,OR 97068 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 2S104AD01000 2S104AD02900 ENDICOTT,JOHN A GARDINER,GAIL E 12730 SW 128TH AVE 8015 SW CANYON LN TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S1036806100 2S104AA09200 ENGLISH,JAMES& GONZALEZ,JOSE M HAYES,JEANETTE 12240 SW 127TH AVE 12600 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA01900 2S104AA04200 ESTRADA,AMY&RAY GOULET,GERALD T&LAURA M 12545 SW BELL CT 12300 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA00500 25104AA04400 FEDERIUK, ISAAC&NAOMI GREENBERG-NICHOLAS,CAROLYN 12475 SW 127TH AVE NICHOLAS,KALLA TIGARD,OR 97223 GREENBERG,PATRICIA A 12360 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD02300 2S104A005600 FOERSTER,JAMES W AND GROSS,WAYNE E JO NELLE GROSS,JANE A 12535 SW 128TH 12862 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,QR.97223 2S1038C04800 2S104AA05300 FORD,WILLIAM H&SHEILA C HALE,THOMAS L&TERESA L 12675 SW 124TH 12245 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC04700 2S103BC04400 FRANCO,HECTOR S HAMES,BEVERLY J 12705 SW 124TH AVE PO BOX 23115 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 251038801700 2S104AD06300 FRANCO,VICTOR M HANSEN,ERIC L&LESLIE A 12479 SW BROOK CT 12915 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB00400 2S104A006400 FRANZEN, NORMAN R HANSE RI &LESLIE A JANET E 12915 SW NUT ST 12605 SW 124TH TIGARD, 9 23 TIGARD,OR 97223 tiquettes faciies a peler A ; Repliez a la hachure afin de Jtilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-8 0 GO-VE Y I deni along line to ®5961T"" Use Avery®Template 5161® :1 Paper "m�l expose PodeTM �'1 2S104A003900 2S103BB03300 CARLTON,MARK M.&BRENDA G. DANIEL GRANT LLC PO BOX 230398 BY YOZAMP,KIMBERLYN A TIGARD,OR 97281 12407 SW 133RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104A005700 2S104AD05900 CHAN,LAWRENCE DARBY,JOHN R&KIMBERLY BRASHLE LAM,LINH 12918 SW SEVILLA AVE 12884 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C09200 2S103BC09300 CHEN,LETTY P DAVIS,ALISON K 12870 SW BLUE HERON PL 12880 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104A001800 2S103B801100 CONNOR,CATHLEEN P DAVIS,MELISSA D 12655 SW 128TH AVE 12465 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 28104AA01300 2S104AD00100 COOK,DALE J/JENNIFER N B DECHANE,JENNIFER 12300 SW BELL CT BODE,JUANITA TIGARD,OR 97223 12600 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA00300 2S1036801500 CROMWELL,SAMUEL T DONOVAN,RUTH REVOCABLE MARGARET A LIVING TRUST 12665 SW 127TH 12480 SW BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01400 2S104AD05500 CRONHOLM,SCOTT M DUBOIS,JASON B&SHANNON N 12705 SW WALNUT 12848 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD03504 25104AD02400 CULWELL,LESLIE 0 AND DURDEL,NICLAUS C DIANNA L 12925 SW WALNUT ST 12800 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD03503 2S103BB00800 CULWELL,LESLIE D/DIANNA L DURHAM,STEVEN W&SHELLEY L 12800 SW WALNUT ST 12525 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02500 25104A004800 DANG,BENJAMIN&MAI VO EASLEY,JOHN H&MARGARET M 12685 SW KAREN ST 12923 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 `tiquettes faciles a peler J Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Jtilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargenlent reveler le rebord Pop-up"" 1-800-GO-AVERY 6aay rcci Laueu — tts [Ji gee Instruction Sheet Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5961T" .ed Paper for Easy.'Feature QAVERY®5961TM ; 1 2S104AD00500 22S104AA90202 ABRAHAMSON,BRUCE Q&SHERRY L BASTIN,JOHN C 12735 SW MARIE CT PO BOX 231086 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S104AA01400 2S103B800600 ALLENDER,TARA&THOMAS BECKER,OLIVE ANN TRUST 12270 SW BELL CT 12555 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA13200 2S104AD02801 ALLISON,TIMOTHY D BEELER,BECKY 12470 SW 128TH AVE 12945 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA12600 2S103BC10100 ANDERSON,PETER J&JENNIFER G BEER,DONALD E&JANET L 12380 SW 129TH AVE 12765 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038801900 2510 90000 ANDRE,RONALD J&MURIEL BELLW D T RACE CONDOMINIUMS 12355 SW 124TH AVE OWNERS UNITS TIGARD,OR 97223 , 000 2S104AD03505 2S104AA90331 AUGUST,THOMAS A BELLWOOD TERRACE LLC 12810 SW WALNUT ST PO BOX 189 TIGARD,OR 97223 YAMHILL,OR 97148 • 2S104 03502 2S104AA 011 AUGUS , H AS A BELLWOO TER CE LLC 12810 SW LNUT ST PO BOX 189 TIGARD R 223 YAMHILL,O 148 2S104AA01600 2S104AA9 22 AUSTIN,KURT R&KARI M BELLWOOD R CE LLC 12285 SW BELL CT PO BOX 189 TIGARD,OR 97223 YAMHILL,0 9 2S104AD05400 2S104AA90022 BARCLAY,JAMES LEE BELLWOOD E CE LLC STITES,KATHERINE MARIE PO BOX 189 12826 SW SEVILLA AVE YAMHILL,0 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD00900 2S104AA90311 BARMETTLER,KEVIN P&MARY C BELLWOOD TE RA LLC 12790 SW MARIE CT PO BOX 189 TIGARD,OR 97223 YAMHILL,OR 97 Etiquettes faciles a pelerA Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5961M" Sens de chargement Consultez la feuille w ry.com d'instruction 1-800-GO800-GO-AVERY cagy reel— 1.417e15 a. 1681 I Bend along line to Use Avery®Template 5161® •i Paper �j expose Poll=dgeTM �A ®5961TM j 2S104 90142 2S104AA03700 BELLW D RRACE LLC BRAY,WILLIAM R&DENISE E PO BOX 1 12520 SW KAREN ST YAMHILL 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90151 25104AD00800 BELL O ERRACE LLC BRAZER,GREG R&ELIZABETH A PO BOX 12770 SW MARIE CT YAMHILL 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90162 2S104AD01300 BELLw OD RRACE LLC BROWN,DOUGLAS L&STEPHANIE L PO BOX 9 12725 SW WALNUT YAMHILL, 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90171 25104AA12800 BELLW 0 ERRACE LLC BROWN,MICHAEL K&RONNIE L PO BOX 9 12485 SW 128TH AVE YAMHIL ,0 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA90181 2S104AA00600 BELLW D ERRACE LLC BROWN,SHANE L&STEPHANIE PO BOX 1 12720 SW BELL CT YAMHIL ,OR 7148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90191 2S103BC08600 BELL O TERRACE LLC BURTZOS,SANDRA L PO BOX 9 12790 SW BLUE HERON PL YAMHIL , 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA13600 2S104AA01000 BERG,JONATHAN W&LINSAY M BYE,JUSTIN T 12320 SW 128TH AVE 12450 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC10200 25103BC09600 BLUE HERON PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC BYLES,NANCY FAMILY REVOC LIVING PO BOX 231263 PO BOX 230209 PORTLAND,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97281 2S104AA13400 251036C04000 BOND,SUSAN R REVOCABLE LIVING T CAMERON,DONNA IRENE BY BOND,SUSAN R TR 12490 SW WALNUT ST 12410 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA04300 2S104AA12400 BONNONO,DENNIS ROBERT AND CANUTT,PAUL R&KAY M CAROL LYN 12470 SW 129TH AVE 12320 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes faciles apeler 1 4 I Repliez a la hachure afin de www.averycom 1 Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement 1 reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY A Jam and Smudge Free Printing MEM www.aver cor 0 AVERYo5961TM Use Avery®TEMPLATE 59611M • 1-800-GO-AVE. 2S104AA90031 2S104AA90071 BELL OD T RACE LLC BELL 0 ERRACE LLC PO BOX 8 PO BOX YAMHIL R 97148 YAMHI 0 7148 2S104 90302 2S104 90082 BELL OD RRACE LLC BELL TERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 9 YAMHIL 0 7148 YAMHI , 97148 2S104 9004 2S104 902 2 BELLW D ERRACE LLC BELLW ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 1 YAMHI ,OR 7148 YAMHIL 0 97148 2S104••J0291 2S104AA90102 BELLWO•• T' RRACE LLC BELL 0 TERRACE LLC PO BOX 18• PO BOX 9 YAMHILL, F. • 148 YAMHI , 97148 2S104AA90051 2S104AA90231 BELLW•IND T -RACE LLC BELL O ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1:1 PO BOX 9 YAMHILL •R • 148 YAMHI ,0 97148 2S104AA90281 2S104AA90111 BELL OD RRACE LLC BELLW TERRACE LLC PO BOX PO BOX 1 YAMHI ,O 7148 YAMHIL ,OR 7148 2S104AA90061 2S104AA901 1 BELL OD ACE BELLW ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 1 YAMHILL R 7148 YAMHIL ,0 97148 2$104AA90271 2S104 90222 BELL 000 T RRACE LLC BELLW D ERRACE LLC PO BO 189 PO BOX 1 YAMHILL, 97148 YAMHIL O 7148 2S104AA90262 2S104 90131 BELLW D T RACE LLC BELL 0 ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX YAMHILL, 8 YAMHILL 97148 2S104AA90251 2S104AA90 11 BELLWO D T RRACE LLC BELL O TERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 9 YAMHILL,0 97148 YAMHIL , 97148 )wL965 eA?J3/\bl 1t\ AJ3AV-09-008-1. ,n1965 viege6 al zasii rn was'dtane'nnr�nn aotdea a6eunas e is a6euunoauue uotssa&dwt City of Tigard ,405Po44,s?- % es III ' 13125 SW Hall Blvd. .t.,:ii.1 ' d:„. R400,-.4. ,v,--7,,3•7-A-'...Lf,;T: - TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223 - N 0.2 1M $ 00.460 446..... r)0042P3'34e1 IANI-?.1 7(71 ILiroc•,1-11•=1• • MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 97223 2S104AA01300 COOK,DALE MENN1FER NB 12300 SW BELL CT 77GARD,OR 97223 NIXIE 970 5E 1 00 02/04/13 i i RETURN TO SENDER I NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED ttNABIE TO FORWARD i BC: 97223816799 *1129-04562-31-45 ..T.7.2 -Anste131E,_67 iiillili,ihdi11'1.1411.1.!1411.11 i ilAiiiiii!:--,, 1 City of Tigard ysc Pos.,. 14 ° 13125 SW Hall Blvd. _ . ,;` . ti'+ i i s � .e�na. 4j PIENEY BOWES TtGARo Tigard, Oregon 97223 �,,F�kr �, ' $ 00.460 Irti `: ; 02 1M k i+}V... 0004293344 JAN31 2013 3 •:::;F Ve"K MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 97223 I i 2S704AA03700 BRAY,WILLIAM R&DENISE E -""...5/1 ".. , 12520 SW KAREN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 NIXIE 970 SE 1 00 02/04/13 RETURN TO SENDER ivy i DELIVEY^sABL E AS ADDRESSED .9 1'4 A .E TO .r OR. 1.. BC: 97223816799 *1129-04922-31-45 3 -t" :":2G 13 1 w? !!; ;;!::i! ;l:l;Yl; ::l4i!iYliYYYtl;!tY:l3fY!!:l,il,!„li:i!! City of Tigard g1O FQ 11 : 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ': Aamer;; TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223 , :,*t` PIMP, ry BOWLS 0 2 1 M $ 00.46 � .4. 0004293344 JAni31 2013 :f MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 97223 2S103BB01100 DAVIS,MELISSA D 12465 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 NIXIE 970 SE 1 00 02/05/13 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DEL IVE:RABLE AS ADDRE.S'SE13 N, 2 f E rn r hR'W !n BC: 97223816799 *1129-04512-31- 45 —5.. :ES:BLISZ3 t, 7 .� - ii�_i j�jil.li.E_�f.filln i,u,i,ji Siuii,ij j� i,i i,iuuj•' PL:RT..AM.4 City of Tigard „. • 1 m 13125 SW Hall Blvd. . s 4.2::1.'13 :,''�4: :� 1;° „�. ,_;', TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223 ''_•_t•. 021M $ 00,460 }y.• 0004293344 JAN31 2013 !•'' '•r MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 97223 2S104AD00200 ROHR,RICHARDA 1107 SITKA AVE NEWBERG,OR 97132 X 9.70 N7E 1 911.I 00 02/02/13 F- ORWAK13 11Mt tXi' K iN 10 SEND ROHR "RICHARD A -4��i0 N COLLEGE ST NEWRERG OR 97 132 2651 RETURN TO SENDER =7i324 15 igy57 City of Tigard g�P Post 13125 SW Hall Blvd. E'#'._ R er5a- _ . , 1' T I G A R D Tigard Oregon 97223 F:}K[rt=it•r RINEY BOWES $ 00.45Q ± • W ' 02 1M ?,1 0004293344 DEC 10 2012 es' : ' t'.• LS MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 97223 M1 2S103BB01100 DAVIS,MELISSA D 12465 SW 124THAVE TIGARD,OR 97223 NIXIE 970 5E 1 00 12/14/12 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD • r-•-._ B!C: 97223816799 *1529-007G9- '11-29 9722_V I $r167- �1��±,11IIil�llli'1�±±I11�I111 ti1Sli�liilt�i�Il�±l'1llillll�� INCity of Tigard ��P sP%,q 13125 SW Hall Blvd. E', .•t �`g,� TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223 ` '�' �'"`"BOW! Fwg', i. 0004293344 00 45C 10 ° IP' `-{+3—+yt MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 9 7 22 3 2S104AA03700 BRAY,WILLIAM R&DEMISE E 12520 SW KAREN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 NIXIE 970 7E 1 00 12/3.3/12 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO rOR WAR 0 a—r.71 -.. . BC: 97273816794 * 1529-00637--11-29 ?`'9`7 �35•> RI 67 ilil„Iiioitilti �IIIIIllel„litilliolittlitiii uiliii1",II City of Tigard P ytP • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. ••#. •' j � „ „ TIGARD Tigard, Oregon 97223 :tir ,. ;i. _ 1.T 02 1M $ 00.45° • .k • 0004293344 DEC10 2012 • '► ' •• MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 97223 2S104AA01300 COOK,DALEJ/JENNIFE'R NB 12300 SW BELL CT 77GARD,OR 97223 NIXIE 970 7E 1 00 1.2/13/12 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD � GG '"%'= :: SC: 97223816799 152D- x ©09&? 11 29 972238167 I{�I�,i,,,l�,A,1�1�sy!�19��„i��„11,11„1,,,1��1„{��,��i�� City of Tigarde:CF-sr „ 41 11114 I 13125 SW Hall Blvd. i I) Tigard Oregon 97223 .: 3 ov . nrury"`�"`s 02 1M $ 00.450 ++rT •• 0004293344 DEC 10 2012 - • MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 97223 2S104AD00200 ROHR,RICHARD A 1107 SITKA AVE NEWBERG,OR 97132 X R70 N7F 7 a11T nn 17117/17 FORWARD TIME EXP F:TN TO SEND ROHR 'RICHARD A 410 N COLLEGE ST NEWBERG OR 97132-2651. 7{^^q ti r':- RETURN TO SENDER 972r3gr$167 IIII I Notice of a Type II Proposal Sensitive Lands Review TIGAR R Case ID: SLR2012-00003/MMD2012-00021/SGN2012- 00156/TRE2012-00026 (Jack Park Trail & Fire Station Parking Lot Modification) Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Monday, December 10,2012 120 days = Wednesday, March 13, 2013 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: John Floyd 503-718-2429 Johnfl@tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Monday, December 24, 2012 . Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: SLR2012-00003 (Jack Park Trail& Fire Station Parking Lot Modification). Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person:John Floyd. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The Applicant seeks approval to develop an unimproved section of Jack Park and TVF&R Fire Station 50. The project includes Sensitive Lands Review for the development of an ADA accessible trail, including an engineered bridge span across Krueger Creek, to connect the existing park area to the existing community room and parking lot at the fire station; a minor modification to the TVF&R Fire Station 50 Conditional Use Permit to remove one parking stall to accommodate an ADA accessible trail entrance into Jack Park; and a tree removal permit to allow the removal of nine trees to accommodate the trail. Associated with the project are a new entry sign for Jack Park, enhancements to Krueger Creek, and associated riparian area restoration Applicant: City of Tigard Parks Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,Oregon 97213 Owner 1: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97213 Proposal Address: 12420 SW 127th Avenue (Jack Park) 12617 SW Walnut (TVF&R Fire Station 50) Legal TAX MAP 2S104AA,LOT 04600;2S104AD,LOTS 04500&04501 Description: Zoning: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District Approval Criteria: 18.330.020.C; 18.360.090; 18.510.030; 18.510.050; 18.745; 18.765.030-040; 18.765.070; 18.775.020; 18.775.050; 18.775.070; 18.780.130; & 18.790.050. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 What You Should Know About is Type II Proposal • The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. Type II decisions are made by the Community Development Director after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and Site Map Notice to Mortgagee,Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 • • Site Map 7 ; Ti 'i .- -'11 T., --, -1 -'11 ---I 1 -, 7. 1 ' I 1 '!' 1 1 ) \' - 11 -1 ,iik-1- N - IN.%) , -f.cNv ___1111 IP ' Li ,1 3AV aN, \ • 1 1, 1 lisl-- ---, ir.e t i — 1 If Ir. ---Z 1 --7 ' Z . ' '... --1 -) 1 \ 71 7 , -, ---1 --, --, *, 7-1 \ ., J rk V ,4'...! ''': • :11 ..., \ '1 '‘i ....I -.V.< -'1 1 - •1 - 7 --\-. ) \ " -1 1 , -1 \ ---- ,'7• _, \ - al, 107- 'A I --1- - II -1 --1-1 ' V\ -1,c— -1 I \ --.-1-7 1---1 -ii --, • -.- kid -. r. . \ , -' ---1-1 -I i -1 ••1 --1 -I, -1,,,.. 1 , .., , --„ , •••••, -Li _ ---1 --1 ..,4,4••....., - -,, 0 1 -1--, .., . 11ri,,,FA ", ,:' -1, -,... ••• , < •• - , ,',,, ... I 11 • -7-•7.-, i,'..v ,. my vi •,!..\ Is--, -7-, -,' . --.•. --1 •% - --' --; 11 ••„: \, - 1 1 -1, - -I, . „I 4 1 •r . \ -1, 1 - "1 1 .. --i , 1"f r ''' ' 1 -1 1 n t, , , ' ) l'• i-1 - t i, „, -1 ' ''- 1 I. i ill°all , n -I a II =a --, ---,. _ PP ,. ---1-1 .... rl • .S-ION 7 VA?) ;I'll -1-1/--- -id 1416Z4 , - -II ' 714741,14411P - \ ailii ' 1-1 i i \ 1 1 s -I,f 1.•.-J v ..., ' • '',/ "1. laj,,,..,Lz I i i /area . - ' 1 \-.... -, _.,...1 --; --, •— -1 I, ,, -7 . •-s -- - I '-`' ..., -7 ., i 1 1 7.77 . . . i 1 )v , 1 , -) -- . -, -1 Comments: Project Area and Vicinity City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 n N 0 o E. ro ara o '7 rD' • M w o I Zoning Map H 6 fCL CT 000000 12 / 24 0 ..:. zoo a Q. y,.;.;.+.�.� �. Legend 1 l.....a.._. : •. Ij ♦•+++.+•+•+•+. Sub act Site ••••+.••••••++••+++•P••-� W ♦+•••••••••••�•.+•++••••♦ Zoning Classifications N +++•+•+++•+•+•+•+++++•+• I rHf•..•.•+1•+�!••+1•••••• R-130,000 Sq Ft Min Lot Sae I: 11110 ♦••••1•+•+••++•+.++•••++♦ \ ii. ••+•••.•N•J•+H+J••••1•• R-2 20,000 S9 Ft Min Let Sae l •r ♦••+•+•.••••••+•1•••1••♦ I--1 /. r••.+••f•••++••.+••++i•❖•i+•+•+•+++•.i+i+•+•+++•• R-3S 10.000 59 Ft Min Lot S¢e !46••••••+•••••••+••.••••••• 7R i•••+•••+•++++••+•+•+•••+•+! R-4.5 7,500 Sq Ft Min Lot Sae ea Nr+•+••+++N++•+�+++••+++•+� i R-75AOOSq Ft Min Lot Size O m •••••••+•+•••••••••••••••• R-123.050 Sq Ft Min Lot Sae ♦••1•+••.•••••••••••••••••. —I R-25 1pBOSq Ft Min Lot Sae R ,�� 1 / •••+•••••+•+•�•�•�•�•�•�•�+�•�•�•�•�•.••:. =7 R-40 40 Units Per Acre •••+�+•+•+••••••1••••••••••-- _._..�MUR-1 Mv¢tl Use Residentialt •++•+•�f+•+•+•�f+••+••+•+•�•+•+•�•+•�•�•+•f•�•,.Ng ®MUR-2 Mix ad Usa Residential 2 S- r••+•f�••f�+lf•.•+•.•f�.*❖�•�•f••+�❖�❖f•�❖�•f•:• a _MU CBO Mixed Use Cenral Bus Uist •••••••+•••�•••-♦••+••••••••♦ -- S ®C-C Community commercial C� I •.�.•Y971:�•�Y'v�....❖+••++.•❖••+•+•+❖+❖+•+•+1+•+i••+•+•+•+❖•❖+i•1 ~ _GG General Commercial :+ .u.+ ••.❖.•.:-...=:f+... =::.-`...:..:::::..:::....:::..' N C-N N•ighborhoodCarmierdal taa ' •i•+•iii•+•ii ii ii ii i•+•i i+i+i ifi•••i P+•�c _ ' C-P Proressbnal Conmierdal [J —� •.••••+•••••••••••.••••�••it MUC Mixed Use Commercial w +❖•+++•++•+++++++•+•+i+++•+++•++++•++••+••• .:•+•� ,AMC -1 MoOd Use Commerc al 1 CA > •+•.•.•••••+++•••.••.•.••••.• Q / •••••••••++••+•••••••••••••• _MUE Mixed Use EmpobYment a•.•••••.••+•+•••••••N••+•+• - MN MUEd Mixed Use Empbyrrentt by ♦+•••••f+•••+•••+•+++r•f+f•♦ f MARIE CT !••••+•+•••••+•••+•�%+••••••• ••.••.•••++•+.••+•..•••+•f•♦ 1R11•' _MUE-2 Mixed Use Empbyrnent2 m l+++++++•+++++♦+•♦+.+•+••+•••• L N ••••1+♦♦•+1+•+♦••••+•+••••••• 4L Light Industrial ♦••+1+•+•+.+++••+••••+•f•••• 1 )�i+❖•i•�•i•+•i�+••�+••�•+•�i+•++••++•i•++•�•�•�•�•�•�/ sa 4P IMuatrial Park p- \ ••ii�ii•.•ii+i+i+i+i+ii++'••i+iii++•i+ii+iifiifi ♦•.+..+•••1+1•.•••.••..••+•. _1-H Heavy Industrial ill 1-1 �••••••••+•♦•i••.••++••+1•••r •.+•+i+•+.+i+.+++.+•+•+i 4•++i•••i+•+.+.+i+•+i•+•❖+••+x.__ • Washinplon County i•.+•+•+•+•+�++••••+•+•+•+.+. ••if•+++••+++•+++•.++•+�i+••+••f•+.++•+++•+++•+f+•+f+••• OvN Zones M \ �•.f.•+�•�+�+�•+❖+❖t�•+•.•1•❖+❖•••+•••.••�++••❖� • 0 i \'r•••+•••••••r••+•••••••++••••♦ X/Historic District Overlay ♦••+•••.•••.f•.••+•••••••♦•• Pla metl D¢vebpm¢nt Ove rlay DO aa+ •++ + ++++++++ + ++ wnuMV aPr iP rrR Nry ON DeF 1•o2•+ •• +❑ •.W+ 1 a.•++ swua�wQC°Va., re avw .V rnr ionm+ oevuwvVeer ---1 WALNUT ST DATA IS DennaVO rr=o ¢. n a aaN® W Ø �.. LOMfMiIIIErNrtSI pC WIiNIOELt tfAM1�Knl11F / UayLW sOe 0rn tlMAB W9140.18.r.we Mx[H NTe Mp1W riOn n0VNF0 nfe0 Or OOW<Nlle. / �� L r/�j x ;:A IM MJNYIY OEYE�OPMFNT DEPARTMENT d y'/��3• PD .�.Prb�..HHa,..' ';y -.---__ �?�►ij t�G 0. ps 131�ssdwi-ld el.d P503634.-4174 I /i A Mp a OR 073I3ill I f 1 ! s • p AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING , TIGARD I, Christine L. Wiley, being first duly sworn/affirm, on oath depose and say that I am a Senior Administrative Specialist for the City of Tigard,Washington County, Oregon and that I served the following: {Qrtck.lppmpsiare Box(s)Below) 0 NOTICE OF a 1YPE II Proposal FOR: Sensitive Lands Review,SLR 2012-00021/SGN2012- 00156/TRE2012-0026 (Jack Park Trail&Fire Station Parking Lot Modification) 0 AMENDED NOTICE- x City of Tigard Planning Director ❑ Tigard Hearings Officer ❑ Tigard Planning Commission ❑ Tigard City Council A copy of the said notice being hereto attached, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part hereof, was mailed to each named person(s) at the address(s) shown on the attached list(s), marked Exhibit "B", and by reference made a part hereof,on December 10,2012,and deposited in the United States Mail on December 10,2012 postage prepaid. (Person that..-Pt ared Notice) STATE OF OREGON County of Washington ss. City of Tigard Subscribed and sworn/affirmed before me onthe /D day of be - ,2012. °FRO&SEAL. = , 1NRRLEY L TREAr or COMMISSION ON NO.• 5ON 98 / MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 06,2015 N TARP PUBLIC OF OREGON My Commission Expires: `7i (o r I S" • • II gNotice of a Type II Proposal ' Sensitive Lands Review r `' R I) Case ID: SLR2012-00003/MMD2012-00021/SGN2012- 00156/TRE2012-00026 (Jack Park Trail & Fire Station Parking Lot Modification) Tigard Community Development Contact Information Date of Notice: Monday,December 10, 2012 120 days = Wednesday, March 13,2013 To: Interested Persons Staff Contact: John Floyd 503-718-2429 Johnfl@tigard-or.gov If you would like to comment on this proposal, we need to receive your written comments by 5 p.m. on Monday, December 24, 2012 . Please mail or deliver your comments to 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard, Oregon 97223. Include the Case ID Number: SLR2012-00003 (Jack Park Trail & Fire Station Parking Lot Modification). Please address your comments to the appropriate staff person:John Floyd. Information About the Proposal Description of the Proposal: The Applicant seeks approval to develop an unimproved section of Jack Park and TVF&R Fire Station 50. The project includes Sensitive Lands Review for the development of an ADA accessible trail,including an engineered bridge span across Krueger Creek,to connect the existing park area to the existing community room and parking lot at the fire station; a minor modification to the TVF&R Fire Station 50 Conditional Use Permit to remove one parking stall to accommodate an ADA accessible trail entrance into Jack Park; and a tree removal permit to allow the removal of nine trees to accommodate the trail. Associated with the project are a new entry sign for Jack Park, enhancements to Krueger Creek, and associated riparian area restoration Applicant: City of Tigard Parks Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97213 Owner 1: City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard, Oregon 97213 Proposal Address: 12420 SW 127th Avenue (Jack Park) 12617 SW Walnut (TVF&R Fire Station 50) Legal TAX MAP 2S104AA,LOT 04600;2S104AD,LOTS 04500 &04501 Description: Zoning: R-4.5: Low-Density Residential District Approval Criteria: 18.330.020.C; 18.360.090; 18.510.030; 18.510.050; 18.745; 18.765.030-040; 18.765.070; 18.775.020; 18.775.050; 18.775.070; 18.780.130;& 18.790.050. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 What You Should Know About Ai Type II Proposal 1 The proposed development requires a land use review. The goal of this notice is to invite interested parties to participate early in the decision-making process by submitting comments in writing during the open comment period. Type II decisions are made by the Community Development Director after consideration of relevant evidence and public comments received during the open comment period. The decision will be mailed to the applicant and to owners of property located within 500 feet of the proposal site and anyone who submitted written comments or is otherwise entitled to a decision notice. The decision maker may: • Approve the proposal. • Approve the proposal with conditions. • Deny the proposal. All evidence considered in the decision will be contained in the public record and available for public review. If you would like to review this material, please schedule an appointment with Lora Garland, Records Management Specialist, 503-718-2483. If you wish to receive copies of the materials, city records will prepare them for you at a reasonable cost. Appeal Information Failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity may preclude subsequent appeals to the Land Use Board of Appeals or Circuit Court on that issue. Comments directed at the relevant approval criteria (Tigard Development Code) are what constitute relevant evidence. Details regarding the appeal process and requirements are contained within Tigard Development Code Chapter 18.390. There is a fee charged for appeals. Attachments Included in this Notice Zoning and Site Map Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder,Vendor, or Seller The Tigard Development Code requires that if you receive this notice it shall be promptly forwarded to the purchaser. City of Tigard,Community Development Division•13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 • • Site Map firi tirw -1-1 7 1 1 Al li . --LI--1 Ns. , • 1 \ . 1 : \ .\. 1 1 9 *) 7 \ A NMOCISNV1 -1 ...", 4011141/9 1\ 1L1$- Ill trA A, 1' __Li 7-1 _11 --A -1 ' I A I • 1 ' 111 71 " ---1 A S. ', --1' I, Li -- -I -I 'A -,: "N 1 \ /_AAV iltIA 1 7 \ , -1 --1 --1 --1 -.1 ,. —1...., —n 1 1 _ -1 --,, • .:e. -, \, ---, -1 -1 a)."1A 11 \11, -1, - . A c- '--1 --, A, -1-, ,-,..,' , '•., \ \ \ , .1 -1 _.-1 -,•,, , 7 -1---1 <-2. .-1 -.I 1 JAV V 111A3S ' " •11 ..,, \ If li - 1 •i 1 1 -1 1 ''.4ritiV,011 ‘ % 7 $ 1 1 11!110,am_ •• 1-,,- , \ 1 MIS 1 -1 1 -- , 3;1 tf,,417-7-ile lart .1 1 litratitei •1'‘I a 4 ---1 -1 4 .,-... .71 -1 7/23 II fa AIM ille.ar t . sia , _ __IS IfIN1-VM 1 13 HISZIA 7 ''. .\\ -1 S. -1 1 IS 308VVO 1: —1 7 i 1''''1 -1 ---7-11-• --1- . -: , .1 Mk iiii , - , i 1 1 -1, ' ''' ''? 7 ... °‘. , --1 "-, .' '• ' ' ON," --, _ 1 -1 ., 1 3AV ONZEL 1 1 ...-1 -'1 '7 -, vo -, 7 ' Comments: Project Area and Vicinity City of Tigard,Community Development Division 43125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,Oregon 97223 H_., SI O Oro o• 'Q �- n , d C7 Q Zoning Map p o H g eFL� �t QQQQQ R 12 Q k - •v.. . Oposo j ..egend.••.. n i i i i•••i•••i•►•i i i'v.. •:•:•: Subiect Site r•N.•.•••.•....•... t W e.•••,••••••.••••••••••..• Zoning Classifications g. N r.1...•.•••♦N.•.........• R-1 30,000 Sq Ft MN Lot Sire • ♦.....•••.•••••••.•.•.•.♦ R-2 20.000 Sq Ft MN Lot Size ►•••�.•..�•,•...•,��.•••�•�•�•.��.��•�•��• R-3.5 10,000 Sq Ft MN Lot Size d 4 '••••••,•,•••••••••••••❖.,•�%WO..�.••,•••,•e ---- O ^' 1.•..N.•.♦♦..♦••...N•N, - 1R-4.57.500 Sq Ft Min Lot Size �•••��•�•••••�•��•• _�Rd 5.000 Ft Min Lot Size w N.••r..•...••.H••.••••..• R-12 3,050 F ..•....1...1•......•i•..•♦ Sq Ft Min Lot Size �H..................J....i ♦.•N.♦••.................. fl-25 1 080 Sq Ft MN Lot Size r+ / ••.•......•••.•i••1•..•...♦ IR-4040 Units Per Acre rn r•••••••••••••►••❖•••❖•••••••••.•••❖•.•❖•.•.. ❖.••❖.❖.❖.❖•❖.40:••••••❖.:.❖.•••i i MUR-t Mixed Use Residential 1 ••••••••••••••••:•••••••••• W MUR-2 Mixed Use Residential2 r• a•••❖•❖•❖1❖.❖.•.�.❖. .❖.❖.❖••••••.� _ rj�•••••*,►j•,•,,•,,••�,•,�,�j�,�,�,•,�j�•�,�,�,�j�j _MU-C BD Mixed Use Central Bus Dist • `. .••...•..•..•.•...•........• ••••••••••••••••....••....•e �.• .•••••..•.•,.,.,.,,,.,•,- _ ®CC Commundy Cammerual r•. ............•...........• AP p .....-.Jw•: ••.Y'•..R-44. 4••❖.❖.••:.❖•••❖•••❖•❖.•••••►❖.❖.❖••i ~ C-G General Commercial .-. w•... ...h1�•:•.!i�.�:!..•.•❖•••�•••❖•❖•❖:❖1••� N -—C-N Neighborhood Commercal •Y•..♦ ♦......��...•..•. —. r. -CA ♦•...•.......••.•.'.'.'.Yi...�. GP Professbnal Commerdal �....•.••.•........•.•..1.♦i. ♦•••••••••••••......••.•..i. MUC Miz•d Use Commercial N ,. r❖i••❖•❖.❖.•i❖•❖.••❖.❖i❖1❖•❖1•i••� — W •••••••••••••••••••••••••�•�' MUC-1 Mixed Use Commercials a r.••❖•••❖•••••••••••••••••••••❖•❖••••••••,••••••� __J MUE Mixed Use Empaloyment I•.•...••..•••.•.•.•..••..... .. S r••..........•.•...•.a.•..•.. �MUE•1 Mixed Use Employment1 ♦•••.•...•.•••.....a••.•..•• 1p _ F MARIE CT ••..••.•.•••.•.•.•.•s•.•...•• !il••.••••.•H.•...•.•o.......• 12 _MUE-2 Mixed Use Employment 2 N ►•►••••❖►❖►❖•❖•••••••••••❖,••❖v.v..❖e•1 'I-L Light Industrial •••.•.•.•••••t"AV..**• •�•:•:•:e:•:••••►••••••••�•�•�1_�_. a 4P Industnal Park `i ►•••••••••••••►•••►••••••••••I�•••••••••••,•❖❖•••.: p" \ !•..••••••••••••.•.••.•••..•1 I-H Heav IndustraI ♦•••••••••...�.....•...•.•.• Y �..•.•...►.•H.....•.•.....•• al 1••] .1•••••..1.141.•..•....1.••,x �VW shin gtCn Count' '''��±±± t••••••••••••••••••••••0 e••••❖•••••••••••••••••❖•••� Overlay Zones N..N..•....•...........•...♦ Xf HiStonc 0.strkt Overlay • _.-'"> W •.•....•••••••••••••••••,••.•.• ♦••.....•1•••�....�.••.•.....•t 0 'Planned Development Overlay r••••••••••.•r.••••••••••••Ve C / ��:��:��•�,�•=••• neoMM•noM ON MIS IMP mrw«.ev...ounax ' "NpaWuo OE VARP IYIM THEe[4fLVYf4! J WALNUT ST / r•waaeM.aw 0 Nmi OMO �aww.DI''''""""":"."w �ie unon aouM•v�n+es TO Ite W - '• • . va.cewnewEw a•rn•n.Me W unr.oweo.aE«.IO1.3 rr,.osu+u.�sw.ew < - ___ u�m Mk AM Em.anc wnser.c.C.mccv..sea nrt ///! ws.•MMM lrte.I aae•maSS n MOM cu.0P , �/ S• ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT / , II+��1• /I e A I• • 55 - 'APScebGYhbrs- //�� f+ �� /�/��0 �/I Cex Cl TIMM (Feet IW •�� / '/ // A otzs sw.1171M .. Nob 425— 250 b � a^ rgarc OR 97223 • K 503&38 171 " y rer-- 1-dOe15 ilk MIMI= i Bend along line to Use Avery®Template 5161® id N Paper ' ' expose Pop dgeT'" �Al/ERY®5961TM J J 25103BC09400 2S103BB05500 MEIKLE,COLLEEN JACKSON NORDWELL,STEVEN L&KATHLEEN V MEIKLE,FREDERICK C III 12450 SW 124TH AVE 12860 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC09100 2S104AD04200 MEIKLE,FREDERICK C III OLSON,DENNIS D MEIKLE,COLLEEN JACKSON 12540 SW WALNUT AVE 12860 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S10313B05600 2S104AD04100 MINER,MARGARET K. OLSON,DENNIS D& 12470 SW 124TH AVENUE BONNIE LOUISE TIGARD,OR 97223 12540 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01900 2S104AD03800 MONTOYA,ALICIA BOTTELO& OLSON,KATHLEEN A NIEVES,FIEDL MONTOYA 13660 SW ASH AVE 12625 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD04900 2S104AA00900 MOORE,CAROLYN REVOCABLE LIVING OLSON,SYLVIA A TRUST BY HAUCK,TERRY C 12500 SW BELL CT 1211 SW 5TH AVE#1700 TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97204 2S104AA02200 2S104AD01700 MORLEY,JUDITH EVELYN ORNELAS,JEREMY&JENNIFER 12305 SW 127TH 12705 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA12100 2S103BB01600 MORRISON,SAMUEL P&TRACI LEE OSWALD,JACK D AND %DICKSON,JACK A SALLY JOYCE 12505 SW 129TH AVE 12482 SW BROOK COURT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD00701 2S1030004300 MURPHY,DENNIS D&MARY A PALMER,JACK 12750 SW MARIE CT 10626 SW BARBUR BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97219 2S1036C04100 2S104AA13300 MURPHY,SHARON V PAUL,MATTHEW S 12470 SW WALNUT CHRISTENSEN,DAWN TIGARD,OR 97223 PO BOX 25067 PORTLAND,OR 97298 2S104A003700 2S104AD02601 NESS,STEPHEN&JONA PETTERSON,THOMAS W/PAULINE M FA 12730 SW WALNUT ST THOMAS WIPAULINE M PETTERSEN TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 12921 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes faciles a peler A 1 Repliez a la hachure afin de www,avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51610 Sens de chargement J reveler le rebord Po -u TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 way racer uuc19 ® • //�\ i �enc�a�ong line to \AVERY®5961Tm Use Averyr®Tentpiate 5161 • Paper J expose PopedgeTM �� Gretchen Buchner Patty Newth 13249 SW 136rh' Place 12180 SW Merestone Court Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 Don & Dorothy Erdt Heidi Brenneman 13760 SW 121st Avenue 11680 SW Tigard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs & Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Howard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114n11 Place Tigard, OR 97223 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Keerins 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Shannen Williams Rappold Marketing/Business Development Manager Perlo Construction 7190 SW SandburgStreet Portland, OR 9723 Etiquette s� er { ( ' afin de v { Utiiisez to gab:arit`• !°iRY T,1},A�JNTEsenTs de cfialrSemecOcurpI \I tup\I b eleS Vg for oc a TM UPD g J p- P 1-600-GO-AVERY J `"-7 rew'- `A"=" I nano diC/flg line to Use Avery®Template 5161® iv Paper m��j expose Pop-urge" V \AVERY®59s1TM 2S104AA02700 2S104AA02400 WEISS,STEVEN R&REBECCA M WYFFELS,HENRY R 12255 SW 126TH AVE 12265 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA13000 2S103BB03301 WILLIAMS,JERALD T/SHARON K YANDLE FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 12520 SW 128TH AVE BY JOHN C/HEATHER A YANDLE TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 2804 MISSION COLLEGE BLVD SANTA CLARA,CA 95054 2S103BC05001 2S1038800700 WING LOUIE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNE YINGER FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST PO BOX 86404 BY YINGER,KENT L&DEBORAH LYN TRS PORTLAND,OR 97206 12545 SW 124TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S1038B05800 2S103BB01400 WINKLER,L DUANE/MARIE B ZAGORODNEY,WENDY M&DAVID L 12520 SW 124TH AVE 12476 BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05200 2S103BC09900 WINSTON,MARK ZAKRZEWSKI,CHAPIN ORR WINSTON,ZSUZSANNA 12785 SW BLUE HERON PL 17576 LAKE HAVEN DR TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO, 97035 25104AA04900 WINSTON,MARK&ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE HAVEN RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S104AA05000 WINSTON,MARK&ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE HAVEN DR LAKE OSWEGO, 97035 25104 100 WINSTON, &ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE VEN DR LAKE OS G ,OR 97035 25104AD02600 WIRTHLIN,JOSEPH E 12919 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC08400 WOOD,JOANNE 12770 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquektes fades a peler A iiepiiez a la hachure gin de vvvvw.avery,com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY cosy reer— Lauels A mom=I Bend along line to ' Use Avery®Template 5161® Sp Paper "•••m•J expose PopedgeTM AVERY®5961TTM 23104AA01700 2S104 04501 SMITH,ROGER E&MELE K TIGARD, OF 12305 SW BELL CT 13125 SW LL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD R 7223 2S104AA04100 251038806300 SPAULDING,CORAL TIGAR , I OF 12670 SW KAREN ST 13125 SW LL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGAR OR 3 25104AA05700 23104AA04600 STEDMAN,HAL G JR&CATHERINE.F TIGA CITY OF 12740 SW WILLS PL 13125 S ALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD 7223 2S104AA00700 2S104A000400 STONE,HARVEY L CAROL P - - TORRES,ROSENDO HERNANDEZ 12600 SW BELL COURT BOTELLO,MARIA ODILIA TIGARD,OR 97223 12755 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02300 2S104A004500 STROUD,TERRY TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE BATTILEGA,STEPHANIE 20665 SW BLANTON ST 12285 SW 127TH AVE ALOHA,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA03800 2S104AA02100 SUTTON,UME S VANDERVORT,GERALD E AND SUTTON,STEPHEN NI CARRIE L 12580 SW KAREN 12335 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01200 25104AA00800 TAYLOR,JAMES D VANNICE-BARE,SARAH 12745 SW WALNUT ST 12550 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA00400 25104AA13700 THIES,JOHN AJR&JULIA M VENHEIM,JOHN K AND 12555 SW 127TH AVE LYNETTE E TIGARD,OR 97223 12300 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104 4400 25104AA04700 TIGARD,C WATSON,MITCHELL F/MARY P 13125 SW H 29650 NW OLSON RD TIGARD,0 97 3 GASTON,OR 97119 2S104AA1 00 25104AD02200 TIGARD,CI WEINEL,BRAD OWEN 13125 SW HA 12555 SW 126TH AVE TIGARD,0 972 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiguettes faciles a peter A I Replies a is hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 zasy reer- LaveIs £ immenn I Bend along line to a TM j Use Avery®Template 5161® fly Paper �� expose PopedgeTM ® AVEf21f�5961TM 2S104AD04600 2S104AA90091 PHAM,HAO D RUTLEDGE,JOEL WALTER NGUYEN,LAI T 14782 SW WOODHUE ST 16144 NW GILLIHAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 PORTLAND,OR 97231 2S104AD02800 2S104AA03900 PHAM,HA D SAXMAN,J BROOKE III& NGUYEN,L T DEBORA 16144 NW IL AN RD 12640 SW KAREN PORTL D,OR 97231 TIGARD,OR 97223 25103BC10000 2S104AA04500 PLINSKI,CHRISTIE M SCHILLING,KENNETH L 12775 SW BLUE HERON PL DONNA M TIGARD,OR 97223 12400 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AD00600 2S104AA12200 QUEAHPAMA,RALPH G&MICHELLE K SCHRADER,MARCUS J&ROBERTA L 12730 SW MARIE CT 12490 SW 129TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01500 2S103BB01200 RASMUSSEN,VENETA M& SCHREINER,STEVEN A AND PAUL VICTOR ANNE-LY 12755 SW 128TH 12425 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036C04200 2S104AD04300 RAU,JULIE M SEVERSON,EVERETT 0 12430 SW WALNUT ST BY DENNIS OLSON TIGARD,OR 97223 12540 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR.97223 2S104AA02000 2S104AD06000 RENDA,JOHN J SHELDON,CHARLOTTE M 12395 SW 127TH AVE 12932 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05400 2S1038C04900 ROBINSON,CRAIG W/DENISE E SHULTS,BRUCE L 12225 SW 127TH AVE 12625 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD00200 2S104AA01200 ROHR,RICHARD A SMITH,JANET C 1107 SITKA AVE 12350 SW BELL CT NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA04800 2S103BC09700 RUSSELL,DAVID E II&DENISE M SMITH,MARGARET M PO BOX 643 12885 SW BLUE HERON PL BEAVERTON,OR 97075 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes faciles a peler ♦ I Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-BOO-GO-AVERY Loi/ rcci- tous�a w Sena along ime to WAVER/F®5961rd i Use Avery®Terrlplate 51610 a Paper ' •••••••j expose Pop dgeTM 2S10313601800 2S104AA01500 KEOUGH,DOUGLAS J AND MARSHA D LIVENGOOD,TERRY W&ROBERTA L 12475 SW BROOK CT 12255 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD.OR 97223 2S104AD01100 2S104A002000 KERR, LORI L LU, RANDY S/LORNA K 12760 SW 128TH AVE 12605 SW 128TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC03800 2S104AA03600 KESSLER,MARGUERITE E LYNCH,JEREMIAH J&ERIN J 12425 SW ALBERTA 12515 SW KAREN ST TIGARD, OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S104AA12000 2S10313806000 KIERNAN,JILL ANN MAAG,WAYNE H 12495 SW 129TH AVE AND ALTA L TIGARD,OR 97223 12580 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01600 23103BC05002 KLEFFNER,THOMAS ANTHONY MAHONEY,ROBERT&ELAINE JNT LIV PERRI, FRANCIS TIMOTHY %EBNER,DARIUS WOLFGANG 4975 SW 65TH AVE 1260 12TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97221 WEST LINN,OR 97068 2S10313601000 2S103BB05900 KLEVE,RUSSELL C MANAHAN,WILLIAM D&CHARLENE A 12475 SW 124TH AVE 12550 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02600 2S104AA12900 KNIGHT,ROBERT W MATTHEWS,BRIAN&ANNE-MARIE 1266E SW KAREN ST 12515 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA13100 2S104AD03500 LARSEN,CHRISTINE J MCLEOD,JOYCE& 12500 SW 128TH AVE SAFFORD,AUDREY G TIGARD,OR 97223 229 E WARREN COMMON FREMONT,CA 94539 2S103BC04600 2S103BC04500 LAWRENCE,JUSTIN MCLIT REAL ESTATE,LLC 19311 NE 101 ST AVE PO BOX 725 BATTLEGROUND,WA 96604 PROSSEN,WA 99350 2S104AD03401 2S104AA01800 LEWIS FAMILY REV TRUST MEATH,SHAWN DANIEL BY LEWIS, BRIAN C&CHRISTINE C TR 12445 SW BELL CT 12828 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etlquettes peter g Repiiez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement reveler le rebord Pop-upT 1 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 tasy reel Lapels A Bend along line to R TM Use Ave Template 5161® • Paper �j expose PopiedgeTM ® AV>�1�Y05961 1 251038003400 2S104AA12700 HARSHFIELD,RUTH A JACKSON,JEFFREY R 12505 SW KAREN ST 12455 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05800 2S104AA00200 HARSTAD,CHERYL L JACKSON,JOSEPH E&HEATHER L 12750 SW WILLS PL 12775 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1035805700 2S104AD03501 HARTFIELD,LEE E AND APRIL L JAM,CHRISTOPHER M& 12500 SW 124TH GRAHAM,LAURA J TIGARD,OR 97223 12820 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 25103BC08500 2S103BC09800 HAWES,DIANE S JELINEK,GARY L REV LIV TRUST 12780 SW BLUE HERON PL 12805 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC09500 2S103BB01300 HILL,LAWRENCE JOHNSON,ARIC STORY,DE ANN M 12405 SW 124TH AVE 12900 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA13500 2S104AD04000 HJORTH,RAMONA C JONES,DAVID R&AMY L 12360 SW 128TH 12570 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103B000900 2S104A000300 HOLCOMB,FREDERICK P JONES,JAIMI SARA 12515 SW 124TH AVE 12775 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD05800 2S104AA01100 HOLM,RICHARD KEARNEY,JOSHUA L&STACEY L 12896 SW SEVILLA AVE 12400 SW BELL CT PORTLAND,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD02100 2S10313B00500 HOPP,CARL W III KELLY,PATRICIA M&MARLEEN MARY HACKENMILLER,TIFFANY M 12565 SW 124TH 12585 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD04400 25104AA12300 ISAACSON,GARLA KEMPTER,ROBERT W JR AND 12520 SW WALNUT ST LYNN D TIGARD,OR 97223 12480 SW 129TH TIGARD,OR 97223 tiquettes fades peler Ai Repliez a la hachure afin de www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY easy veer,Laoeis A NIN Bend along line to Use Avery+®Template 51610 • Paper ®j expose PogeTM A� ®3961TT" 2S1038C05003 2S1038C05004 EBNER,DARIUS FURST,EDGAR&ANNA LIVING TRUST 1260 12TH 13850 SW BONNIE BRAE CT WEST LINN,OR 97068 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 25104A001000 2S104AD02900 ENDICOTT,JOHN A GARDINER,GAIL E 12730 SW 128TH AVE 8015 SW CANYON LN TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S1038B06100 2S104AA09200 ENGLISH,JAMES& GONZALEZ,JOSE M HAYES,JEANETTE 12240 SW 127TH AVE 12600 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD, OR 97223 25104AA01900 2S104AA04200 ESTRADA,AMY&RAY GOULET,GERALD T&LAURA M 12545 SW BELL CT 12300 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA00500 25104AA04400 FEDERIUK, ISAAC&NAOMI GREENBERG-NICHOLAS,CAROLYN I 12475 SW 127TH AVE NICHOLAS,KALLA TIGARD,OR 97223 GREENBERG,PATRICIA A 12360 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD02300 2S104AD05600 FOERSTER,JAMES W AND GROSS,WAYNE E JO NELLE GROSS,JANE A 12535 SW 128TH 12862 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC04800 2S104AA05300 FORD,WILLIAM H&SHEILA C HALE,THOMAS L&TERESA L 12675 SW 124TH 12245 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD, OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C04700 25103BC04400 FRANCO, HECTOR S NAMES,BEVERLY J 12705 SW 124TH AVE PO BOX 23115 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S103BB01700 2S104AD06300 FRANCO,VICTOR M HANSEN,ERIC L&LESLIE A 12479 SW BROOK CT 12915 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BBOD400 2S104AD06400 FRANZEN,NORMAN R HANSE ERI &LESLIE A JANET E 12915 SW LNUT ST 12605 SW 124TH TIGARD, 9 23 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes faciles a peter A I Repliez a la hachure afin de www,averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement 1 reveler le rebord Pop-upTP, 1-800-GO-AVERY La]y ri'ei— Ltlt + I Bend along line to Use Avery®Tem.olate 5161® Paper ��j expose PopeldgeTM �A �5961TM 2S104AD03900 2S103BB03300 CARLTON,MARK M.&BRENDA G. DANIEL GRANT LLC PO BOX 230398 BY YOZAMP,KIMBERLYN A TIGARD,OR 97281 12407 SW 133RD AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD05700 2S104A005900 CHAN,LAWRENCE DARBY,JOHN R&KIMBERLY BRASHLE LAM,LINH 12916 SW SEVILLA AVE 12884 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C09200 2S103BC09300 CHEN,LETTY P DAVIS,ALISON K 12870 SW BLUE HERON PL 12880 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01800 251038801100 CONNOR,CATHLEEN P DAVIS,MELtSSA D 12655 SW 128TH AVE 12465 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA01300 2S104AD00100 COOK,DALE J/JENNIFER N B DECHANE,JENNIFER 12300 SW BELL CT BODE,JUANITA TIGARD,OR 97223 12600 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA00300 2S103BB01500 CROMWELL,SAMUEL T DONOVAN,RUTH REVOCABLE MARGARET A LIVING TRUST 12665 SW 127TH 12480 SW BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104A001400 2S104AD05500 CRONHOLM,SCOTT M DUBOIS,JASON B&SHANNON N 12705 SW WALNUT 12848 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD03504 2S104AD02400 CULWELL,LESLIE D AND DURDEL,NICLAUS C DIANNA L 12925 SW WALNUT ST 12800 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD03503 2S103BB00800 CULWELL,LESLIE D/DIANNA L DURHAM,STEVEN W&SHELLEY L 12800 SW WALNUT ST 12525 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02500 25104AD04800 DANG,BENJAMIN&MAI VO EASLEY,JOHN H&MARGARET M 12685 SW KAREN ST 12923 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes faciles a peler ♦ Repliez Ala hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement 1 reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY tasy Peel Labels a =Nomqi- See Instruction Sheet Use Avery®TEMPLATE5961TM •dPaper iAe for EasysFeature gAVERY®5961rM A 28100.000500 25104AA90202 ABRAHAMSON,BRUCE Q&SHERRY L BASTIN,JOHN C 12735 SW MARIE CT PO BOX 231086 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 25104AA01400 2S103BB00600 ALLENDER,TARA&THOMAS BECKER,OLIVE ANN TRUST 12270 SW BELL CT 12555 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA13200 2S104AD02801 ALLISON,TIMOTHY D BEELER,BECKY 12470 SW 128TH AVE 12945 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA12600 251038C10100 ANDERSON,PETER J&JENNIFER G BEER,DONALD E&JANET L 12380 SW 129TH AVE 12765 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1036801900 2S10 90000 ANDRE,RONALD J&MURIEL BELLW D T RACE CONDOMINIUMS 12355 SW 124TH AVE OWNERS UNITS TIGARD,OR 97223 , 000 2S104A003505 2S104AA90331 AUGUST,THOMAS A BELLWOOD TERRACE LLC 12810 SW WALNUT ST PO BOX 189. TIGARD,OR 97223 YAMHILL,OR 97148 2S104 03502 2S104AA 011 AUGUS , H AS BELLWOO TER CE LLC 12810 SW LNUT ST PO BOX 189 TIGARD R 223 YAMHILL,0 148 2S104AA01600 2S104AA9 22 AUSTIN,KURT R&KARI M BELLWOOD R CE LLC 12285 SW BELL CT PO BOX 189 TIGARD,OR 97223 YAMHILL,O 9 2S104AD05400 25104AA90022 BARCLAY,JAMES LEE BELLWOOD E ACE LLC STITES.KATHERINE MARIE PO BOX 189 12826 SW SEVILLA AVE YAMHILL,0 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD00900 2S104AA90311 BARMETTLER,KEVIN P&MARY C BELLWOOD TE RA LLC 12790 SW MARIE CT PO BOX 189 TIGARD,OR 97223 YAMHILL,OR 97 Etiquettes faciles a peler A Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5961""c Sens de chargement d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY tasy reel Lapels A =mem I Bend alon line to $ Use Av?ry®Ten±plate 5161® *Paper �j expose Pod9eTM AVERY®5961TM J 2S104 90142 2S104AA03700 BELLW D RRACE LLC BRAY,WILLIAM R&DENISE E PO BOX 1 12520 SW KAREN ST YAMHILL 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90151 2S104A000800 BELL O ERRACE LLC GRAZER,GREG R&ELIZABETH A PO BOX 12770 SW MARIE CT YAMHILL 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90162 2S104AD01300 BELLW OD RRACE LLC BROWN,DOUGLAS L&STEPHANIE L YA HILOX� 1272 SW WALNUT YAMHILL, 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90171 2S104AA12800 BELLW 0 ERRACE LLC BROWN,MICHAEL K&RONNIE L PO BOX 9 12485 SW 128TH AVE YAMHIL ,O 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA90181 2S104AA00600 BELLW D ERRACE LLC BROWN,SHANE L&STEPHANIE PO BOX 1 12720 SW BELL CT YAMHIL ,OR 7148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90191 2S1038C08600 BELL 0 TERRACE LLC BURTZOS,SANDRA L PO BOX 9 12790 SW BLUE HERON PL YAMHIL 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA13600 2S104AA01000 BERG,JONATHAN W&LINSAY M BYE,JUSTIN T 12320 SW 128TH AVE 12450 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038010200 2S1035C09600 BLUE HERON PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC BYLES,NANCY FAMILY REVOC LIVING PO BOX 231263 PO BOX 230209 PORTLAND,OR 97281 PORTLAND,OR 97281 25104AA13400 2S103BC04000 BOND,SUSAN R REVOCABLE LIVING T CAMERON,DONNA IRENE BY BOND,SUSAN R TR 12490 SW WALNUT ST 12410 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA04300 2S104AA12400 BONNONO,DENNIS ROBERT AND CANUTT,PAUL R&KAY M CAROL LYN 12470 SW 129TH AVE 12320 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 Etiquettes faciles a peter A 1 Repiiez a la hachure afin de www.ave com ry' 1 Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement A reveler le rebord POPUPTM 1-800-GO-AVERY A Jam and Smudge Free Printing ® www.avery.co5 ® AVERY® 5961TM Use AVery®TEMPLATE 5961*M • 1-800-GO-AVE 2S104AA90031 2S104AA90071 BELL OD T RACE LLC BELL O ERRACE LLC PO BOX 8 PO BOX YAMHIL R 97148 YAMHI O 7148 2S104 90302 2S104 901182 BELL OD RRACE LLC BELL •••TERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX :9 YAMHIL OR 7148 YAMHI , • 97148 2S104 9004 2S104 902 2 BELLW D ERRACE LLC BELLW ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 1 YAMHI ,OR 7148 YAMHIL 0 97148 2S104• 40291 2S104AA90102 BELLWO•• T' RRACE LLC BELLW O TERRACE LLC PO BOX 18• PO BOX 9 YAMHILL, • 148 YAMHI , 97148 2S104AA90051 2S104AA90231 BELLW D T RACE LLC BELL 0 ERRACE LLC POBOXI PO BOX 9 YAMHILL R 148 YAMHI ,0 97148 • 2S104AA90281 2S104AA90111 BELL OD RRACE LLC BELLW TERRACE LLC PO BOX PO BOX 1 YAMHI ,O 7148 YAMHIL ,OR 7148 2S104AA90061 2S104AA90121 BELL OD RACE LLC BELLW ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 1 YAMHILL R 7148 YAMHIL ,0 97148 2S104AA90271 2S104 90222 BELL 000 T RRACE LLC BELLW D ERRACE LLC POBO 89 POBOX1 YAMHILL, 97148 YAMHIL 0 7148 2S104AA90262 2S104 90131 BELLW D T RACE LLC BELL O ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX YAMHILL, 8 YAMHILL 97148 2S104AA90251 2S104AA90 11 BELLWO D T RRACE LLC BELL O TERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 9 YAMHILL,0 97148 YAMHIL , 97148 w,L965 A83AV-09-008-L .L965 luege6 ai zastL1R (RA 1nit1 wonruane nnnnnn amder abeuaas a is a6e,unoa11ue uo4ssaidwl APPLICANT MATERIALS • RECEIVED oc 292012 City of Tigard Jack Park WONGiENG NEER�tJG Sensitive Lands Review - Type 11 Tree Removal Permit Sign Permit Minor Modification to an Approved Conditional Use for TVFFtR Fire Station (CUP2007-00003) Submitted to City of Tigard Current Planning Division • September 6, 2012 (revised. 10/25/12) p. • TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Summary of Proposal 1-1 Section 2. Proposed Development 2-1 Section 3. Current Conditions &Impact Study 3-1 Section 4. Application Narrative 4-1 Appendix A. Pre-Application Conference Notes A-1 Appendix B. Neighborhood Meeting Notes B-I Appendix C. Service Provider Letter C-1 Appendix D. Arborist Report D-1 Appendix E. Deed& Encumbrances E-1 Appendix F. Natural Resource Assessment F-1 Appendix G. Geotechnical Report G-1 Appendix H. Storm Water Calculations H-1 Appendix I. Support Letter re: CUP2007-00003 I-1 FIGURES • 1. Vicinity Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Aerial Parcel Map 4. Site Photos T1.0 Plan Set Title Sheet C1.1 - 1.2 Utilities &Drainage Plan L0.1 - 0.3 Existing Conditions Plan L1.1 - 1.3 Tree Preservation &Mitigation Plan L2.1 -2.3 Site Demolition Plan L3.1 - 3.3 Materials Plan L4.1 -4.2 Layout Plan (Site Plan) L5.1 - 5.2 Grading& Erosion Control Plan L6.1 - 6.3 Irrigation Plan L7.1 - 7.3 Planting Plan(Landscape Plan) L8.1 - 8.3 Details • • 111111 ■ M City of Tigard Minor Modification — Type I Application TIGARD ;GENERAL INFORMATION In addition, the Director must find that the proposed change is in compliance with all applicable requirements of Property Address/Location(s): Title 18 of the Tigard Development Code. To complete Jack Park Addition-12420 5W 127th Avenue this review, the Applicant's proposal must include a Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): discussion indicating how the site expansion/change will 25104AA. I nt 04600 & 7S1p4AD J ntS14501 continue to comply with the maximum setback, building Site Size: 7.03 ac height, parking, and landscaping standards. Other Applicant* City of Tigard Parks Division requirements of this title such as dear vision, solid waste storage, non-conforming situations, signs, and tree Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. removal may also be applicable depending on the type and City/State: Tigard,OR Zip: 97223 location of the proposed modifications. Primary Contact: Steve Martin,Parks&Facilities Manager Phone: 503-718-2583 Fax: 503-684-8840 E-Mail: Steve@tigard-or.gov Property Owner/Deed Holder(a)*: BBOUIRED SUBMITTAL,ELEMENTS (Attach list if more than one) City of Tigard (Applications will not be accepted without the Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Phone:503-639-4171 following required submittal elements) • City/State:Tigard,OR Zip: 97223 ❑ Application Form *When the owner and the applicant ate different people,the ❑ Owner's Transfer Signature/WrittenIrumndrization El Title Instrument or Deed applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in ❑ Site Plan(4 Large Plans&One—Reduced to 81"x 11") possession with written authorization from the owner or an ❑ Applicant's Statement/Narrative(4 copies) agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a ❑ Filing Fee $605.00 written authorization with this application. Minor Modifications: Minor Modifications are processed for permitted uses and conditional uses. To review a modification as a Minor Modification, the Director must first find that the expansion FOR STAFF USE ONLY or change does not invoke one or more of the criteria discussed within Section 18.360.050(B) - Site Development Case No.(s): h)0O 1 a —MO a j Review or Section 18.330.020(B)(2)—Conditional Use. If the Other Case No.(s): modification exceeds the maximum allowed under any one or more of the criteria, a Major Modification review is required. Major Modifications are processed in the same manner as a Receipt No.: new Site Development Review or Conditional Use Permit. Date: Applicant's Statement Application Accepted By: The applicant's statement must include a summary of the Date Determined Complete: proposed changes. Criteria in either 18.360.050(B) or Revised: 7/1/11 18.330.020(B)(2) must be addressed with a detailed response `\cumin\""""'\lewd use°PPficsmmn``'""""":OA:winsapp'd°" to each criterion. Failure to provide the information needed to process the application would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. 0 City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 af2 • • To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that m:y be attached to or imposed upon the subject property. • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval • All of the above statements and the statements in the site plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any pennit issued,based on this application,and may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the poliries and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. / " • DATED this Ce day of C.3429 'r' ,20 /Z rgnature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of • I 0 `1 , City of Tigard ° I Sign Permit Application TIGARD kasefl.r.wzw v m:rta s .W....0 w .n.r, snmo:.rw r., L`.biv*)i Y,rmmw4�+-.�rvw'i'u kur'.+ wlwa-.zSebssrr,cv..e+.w,wyO SU.-rcum8�..*aanu so' tssraA ,wt7,z L3:..,asw GENERAL INFORMATION Name of Development/Project FOR STAFF USE ONLY Site Jack Park Addition 5 ^� Address/ Street Addn rs Permit No.: Ci J a Ole-0U/5(0 Location 12420 SW 127th Avenue site/amg.# Coy/state Zip Approved By: Tigard,OR 97223 Date: Name Receipt#: Property City of Tigard Map/TL#: Owner Mailing Addttce Suite Zoning: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Allowable Total Area: City/State Zip Phone Tigard,OR 97223 503-639-4171 Electrical Permit Required? 0 Yes 0 No Tenant or Name Business City of Tigard Parks Division Building Permit Required? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name Rev.7/1/11 TBD i\eo,pie\manure\land we applications\sign permit app.doc Sign Contractor Milling Addn:u Suite • city/State Zip Phone REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS (Note: applications will nos be accepted Oregon Cont.Conk Boned Iicen,e# Exp.Dace without the required submittal elements) ❑ Completed Application Form Proposed (X1 Permanent eat ® Freestanding ❑ Freeway ❑ 2 copies of site/plot plan,drawn to scale Sign ❑ Temporary 0 Roof ❑ Electronic (3 copies,if a building permit is required) ((luck all that apply) Ela'R El Other size requirement. 81/2"x 11",or 11"x 17" 0 2 copies of elevations,drawn to scale 121 New sign? ❑ Alter to existing sign? (3 copies,if a building permit is required) Sign Dimensions: size requirement 81/2"x 11",to 24"x 36" 4'-0"x 2'-0" Total Sign Area(sq.ft): 8 sf ❑ $165.00 Fee (Permanent sign,any size) S' Dam Total Wall Area(sq.ft.) NA = r ❑ $52.00 Fee (Temporary sign,any type) sgn (Complete Direction Wall Faces(circle one):items in NOTES: section) N O E W NE NW SE SW Height to top of sign(feet): 36" • Wall signs do not need to be drawn to scale, but See Sheet L3.1 must include dimensions of wall face and sign for sign location, Projection From Wall(inches): NA placement. and Sheet rs.2 Materials: Steel posts w/wood panel for design detail ------ • Wall signs do not requiresite/plot plans. — Will sign have illumination? ❑ Yes ® No • Freestanding signs over 6 ft. required a building Type: ❑ Internal ❑ External permit. Are there any existing freestanding or wall signs at this location, including wall signs that overlap a tenant space? 0 Yes ® No If"yes",a list or diagram of all sign dimensions and equate (OVER FOR SIGNATURES) • footage must also be submitted. City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 2 • APPLICANTS: • To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. NOTE: Person specified as"Applicant"shall be designated"Permittee"and shall provide financial assurance for work. * When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s)must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application BY SIGNING BELOW,THE APPLICANT(S) SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted, the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true,and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued, based on this application, and may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application, including the policies and criteria, and understands the requirements for approving and denying the application. I hereby acknowledge that I have read this application,that the information given is correct,that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner, and that plans submitted are in compliance with the City of Tigard. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property are required. • Applicant re Date Sign Owner/Agent Date /Ki4l27r4J 0 c ?J 83 Contact Person Name Phone No. City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd., Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-639-4171 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of 2 • • • • 1141 ■ ■ City ofTigard TIGARD Tree Removal — Type I Application GENERAL INFORMATION Property Address/Location: Jack Park Addition-12420 SW 127th Avenue FOR STAFF USE ONLY Case No.(s): TRFaO id 0Q Oa/b Tax Map&Tax Lot#(s): 2S104AA,Lot 04600 & 25104AD,Lot 04501 Other Case No.(s): Receipt No.: Application Accepted By: Site Size: 7.03 ac Date: Property Owner/Deed Hoider(s)*: City of Tigard Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Phone: 503-639-4171 Date Determined To Be Complete: City: Tigard,OR Zip: 97223 Comp Plan/Zone Designation: Applicant*: City of Tigard Parks Division Address: 13125 SW Hall Blvd.. Phone: 503-718-2591 a"''/t"t • i\cwpin\mu,n.\Lod use.pplievti,na\rxe removal permit app.dx City: Tigard,OR Zip: 97223 *When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS. from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owner(s) must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written1 Application Elements Submitted: authorization with this application. PP ❑ Application Form PROPOSAL SUMMARY ❑ Owner's Signature/Written Authorization 0 Tide Transfer Instrument or Deed The owners of record of the subject property request a Tree Removal Permit to allow(please be specific,include exact location,etc.): ❑ Site/Plot Plan ❑ Site/Plot Plan(reduced 81/2"x 11") Removal of seventeen trees to accommodate proposed neighborhood ❑ Applicant's Statement(Address criteria under park development.Three poor quality fruit trees(#1, 2&3) pose 18.790.050(A)Tigard Development Code) ' ❑ Filing Fee$296.00 per tree public safety risk. Five trees(#37,38,39,40&41)are dead. Nine trees(#4,27,28,29,30,32,42,43&53)conflict with proposed trail and bridge alignment. City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 j 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov j Page 1 of2 • • • • List any VARIANCE,CONDITIONAL USE,SENSITIVE LANDS,OR OTHER LAND USE ACTIONS to be considered as part of this application: Sensitive Lands Review,Minor Modification&Sign Permit under concurrent review APPLICANTS: To consider an application complete,you will need to submit ALL of the REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS as described on the front of this application in the"Required Submittal Elements"box. (Detailed Submittal Requirement Information sheets can be obtained,upon request,for all types of Land Use Applications.) THE APPLICANT(S)SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject property • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot plan, attachments, and exhibits transmitted herewith, are true; and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,may be revoked if it is found that any such statements are • false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property. DATED this C 94~ day of S.��"'t�+'""� 20 / 2-- '/r�, • ' ' are Owner's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature City of Tigard I 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 I 503-718-2421 I www.tigard-or.gov I Page 2 of2 • • • # • PEE-APE REID BY: CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION 1,1 LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATION City of Tigard Permit Center 13125 SW Hall Blvd, Tigar4 OR 97223 TIGARD Phone: 503.639.4171 Fax:503.598.1960 File iz J )�— ,oh 3 Other Case# Date By Receipt# Fee Date Complete TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR ❑Adjustment/Variance(I or II) 0 Minor Land Partition(II) ❑ Zone Change(III) ❑Comprehensive Plan Amendment(IV) 0 Planned Development(III) 0 Zone Change Annexation(IV) ❑Conditional Use(III) ®Sensitive Lands Review(I,II or III) 0 Development Code Amendment(IV) ❑Historic Overlay(II or III) 0 Site Development Review(II) ❑Home Occupation(II) 0 Subdivision(II or III) LOCATION WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY WILL OCCUR(Address tf available) Jack Park Addition-12420 SW 127th Avenue TAX MAPS&TAX LOT NOS 25104AA, Lot 04600 & 2S104AD, Lot 04501 'TOTAL StIE SI'ZE. ZONING CLASSIFICATION • 7.03 ac R-4.5 APPLICANT. -- — City of Tigard Parks Division MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PHONE NO. —.. IAXNO 503-718-2591 503-684-8840 PRIMARY CONTACT PERSON PHONP NO Steve Martin,Parks&Facilities Manager 503-718-2583 1'It(1PP.It Y O\W"NY.R/01iUI)1101,1)11i(Attach Iisi if more than one) City of Tigard MAILING ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard,OR 97223 PHONE NO. FAX NO. 503-639-4171 503-684-7297 *When the owner and the applicant are different people,the applicant must be the purchaser of record or a lessee in possession with written authorization from the owner or an agent of the owner. The owners must sign this application in the space provided on the back of this form or submit a written authorization with this application. PRUPOSAI.SUMMARY('lease be ape c) Sensitive Lands Review to approve development of an expansion of Jack Pack,a neighborhood park serving residents of north central Tigard. Proposed site Improvements Include the installation of an ADA-compliant trail and a bridge spanning Krueger Creek.A sign permit,tree permit and minor modification to CUP2007-00003 are also requested. Seventeen trees are proposed for removal. APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT ALL OF THE REQUIRED SUBMITTAL ELEMENTS AS • I DESCRIBED IN THE"BASIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS"INFORMATION SHEET. is\curpin\masters\land use applications\other land use applications.doc • • THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: • If the application is granted,the applicant shall exercise the rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to all the conditions and limitations of the approval. • All the above statements and the statements in the plot plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit issued,based on this application,map be revoked if it is found that any such statements are false. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the application,including the policies and criteria,and understands the requirements for approving or denying the application(s). SIGNATURES OF EACH OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE REQUIRED. -G - c)n/2 Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date • Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Owner's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date Applicant/Agent/Representative's Signature Date • • Section 1 . Summary of Proposal Applicant: Steve Martin, Parks&Facilities Manager City of Tigard Parks Division 8777 SW Burnham Street Tigard, OR 97223 Phone: (503) 718-2583 Fax: (503) 684-8840 Email: Steve@,tigard-or.gov Applicant's Representative: Steve Duh Conservation Technix PO Box 12736 Portland, OR 97212 Phone: (503) 989-9345 Email: steve@conservationtechnix.com • Project Request: Type-II Sensitive Lands Review to approve an expansion of Jack Park serving residents of the Tigard Area 11. The review will also demonstrate compliance with provisions of Chapter 18.360 (Site Development Review)and a request for a minor modification to an existing conditional use permit(TVF&R Station 50 - CUP2007-00003). The project request includes an ADA accessible trail and bridge connecting the TVF&R Fire Station 50 to trails within Jack Park and riparian restoration and enhancement along sections of Krueger Creek. A copy of the April 3, 2012 Pre- Application Conference notes is included in Appendix A. The required neighborhood meeting was held on April 12, 2012 and documentation to which is provided in Appendix B. Location: 12420 SW 127th Avenue Site Size: 7.03 acres Legal Description: 2S104AA, Lot 04600 2S104AD, Lot 04501 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential and Open Space • Section 1 1-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Current Zoning: R-4.5 Applications Submitted For: - Type II Sensitive Lands Review - Minor Modification to an Approved Conditional Use -Tree Removal Permit - Sign Permit Neighborhood: Tigard Area 11 Summary: The City adopted its Park System Master Plan in 2009. The plan outlines the need to acquire park property and construct park improvements to preserve open spaces, enhance water quality and provide recreational opportunities. On November 2, 2010, Tigard voters passed a$17 million general obligation bond to fund the purchase of real property for parks and to fund a limited amount of park development. The City of Tigard Parks Division intends to improve the Jack Park addition, a recently acquired parcel that enlarges the existing neighborhood park, as well as to provide an accessible connection between the older, • existing portion of Jack Park and community meeting room at the TVF&R Fire Station 50. This park project was identified as a high priority project in the Park System Master Plan,the adopted City of Tigard CIP and the Notice of City Measure Election provided to voters regarding the parks bond. The City of Tigard acquired from TVF&R a 1.55-acre parcel of land as an addition to the adjacent Jack Park. The acquisition expanded the 5.5 acre existing Jack Park to a total of 7.03 acres. The site is located at 12420 SW 127th Avenue—north of Walnut Street and east of 127th Avenue. The park is adjacent to the TVF&R Station 50. This 7-acre property currently includes a 5.5 acre open grass area with picnic tables, a baseball field, creek and riparian corridor, basketball court, hard surface bike path and a 2000 sq. ft. playground built in 2000. The proposed park addition is planned to include the following physical improvements: • Section 1 1-2 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • • Accessible trail, including an engineered bridge span, that connects the existing park to the community room at the Fire Station • Riparian restoration and enhancement along Krueger Creek, including the removal of a failed, non-functional pipe culvert No additional off-street or on-street parking is proposed for the park addition. A small tot lot playground and a community garden may be added as a later phase of site development and are not included as part of this application. • • Section 1 1-3 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 • Design Team for City of Tigard Jack Park Land Use Planner: Conservation Technix PO Box 12736 Portland, OR 97212 Phone: (503) 989-9345 Landscape Architect: Laura Herbon Landscape Architect 6824 SE 21st Avenue Portland, OR 97202 Phone: (503) 289-7155 Arborist: Teragan&Associates, Inc. 3145 Westview Circle Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone: (503) 697-1975 • Environmental Sciences: Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville, OR 97070 Phone: (503) 570-0800 Survey: Bluedot Group 11700 SW 67th Ave Tigard, Oregon 97223 Phone: (503) 624-0108 • Section 1 1-4 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Section 2 . Proposed Development Summary of Proposed Project: Jack Park is located on two parcels (2S104AA, Lot 04600 and 2S 104AD, Lot 04501) consisting of 7.03 acres located at 12420 SW 127th Avenue (see Vicinity Map—Figure 1). The site is just north of SW Walnut Street and east of SW 127th Avenue. The park is adjacent to a Fire Station and community room. A portion of Lot 04501 was previously purchased by the City from Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue (TVF&R), and a lot line adjustment was finalized in 2010 (LLA2009-00006). Krueger Creek, a tributary of Summer Creek, flows northeast through the property. The site contains a variety of natural features including sensitive lands, vegetated corridors and habitat ranging from low to high value, as well as wetlands and CWS protection zones. The site has gently rolling topography with small areas of steep slopes near Krueger Creek. The proposed park development project represents the culmination of six years of coordination and planning with TVF&R, and it is related to several successful land use reviews. In 2006,the City of Tigard entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for the joint development of the Walnut Street fire station and expansion and improvement of Jack Park. As a result of this MOU, the City helped finance the parking lot and community room at Station 50, and the parking lot was made larger to serve users of the new park addition. Furthermore,the Station 50 land use submittal designs showed the trail and park additions on the adjacent City property,which are • substantially similar to the current design for the site. Following the Lot Line Adjustment to re- align the parcel boundaries between the City and TVF&R,the City received approval for a Minor Modification to a Conditional Use (MMD2009-00024)to acknowledge public park enhancements planned for the Jack Park addition. The intent of the proposed project is to develop the Jack Park addition consistent with public feedback and earlier approved drawings regarding the layout and design of the property. To facilitate park development for the proposed project,the applicant is requesting modifications to the CUP for Station 50, which are specifically related to the western parking lot and tree removals. One requested modification is for the removal of one parking stall through striping to accommodate safe ADA access between the community room at Station 50 and the proposed Jack Park addition(Sheet L4.2), along with the removal of one planter strip tree. This would allow for a seamless transition between the community room and the park along a direct path across the parking lot. The final approval conditions for the Station 50 CUP stipulated a range in the number of parking stalls allowable to be between 31 and 45 stalls. A total of 39 stalls were included on the approved plans. As part of the proposed park development,the applicant requests a modification of the parking lot by means of asphalt striping to reduce the number of parking stalls by one to accommodate safe, convenient and ADA-accessible entry into the park and connection to the community room. The proposed modification will continue to be in accordance with the noted Conditions of Approval for CUP2007-0003. Furthermore, the applicant contends that the removal/re-striping of one parking stall will be a minor impact to the parking lots • Section 2 2-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 capacity,while making a stronger and safer pedestrian connection between the proposed park • and the station. The other requested modification is for the elimination of a deed restriction placed on three trees located on the Jack Park addition(TL 04501) for public safety and ADA-related site design considerations. The three trees include two poor quality apple trees and a declining sycamore maple. As conditioned in the CUP approval for Station 50,trees#1, #3 and#4 indicated on the Tree Preservation and Mitigation Plan were formerly protected with deed restrictions, although these trees are no longer part of the TVF&R property or necessary for the overall enhancement of tree canopy given the mitigation plantings along the vegetated corridor or in relation to the planned landscape plantings shown as part of this application. At that time in 2006, one apple (#1)was noted as being in poor condition, and all three remained on site because they were simply over 6" caliper. As noted in the updated Arborist Report as part of this application, all of these trees are now in poor condition. The two poor quality apple trees (#1 &#2)are identified for removal because they will create hazards for park users from falling fruit and conflict with the future location of playground equipment. The sycamore maple (#4) is identified for removal because it is in poor condition with significant limb cavities and conflicts with the location of the proposed trail. Additionally,the two apple trees(#1 & #3)offer little value as either shade trees or fruit producers, and the sycamore maple (#4) is considered an exotic invasive species in much of the U.S. In the City's new tree code, none of these three trees would be considered important to save, especially given their poor condition. Furthermore,the City's Parks Division has a long standing internal protocol to remove fruit and nut trees from park sites when they are near trails and playgrounds because of the potential hazards to park users from stinging insects attracted to • fallen and decaying fruit and from a landscape management and maintenance perspective. The City adopted its Park System Master Plan in 2009. The plan outlines the need to acquire park property and construct park improvements to preserve open spaces, enhance water quality and provide recreational opportunities. On November 2, 2010, Tigard voters passed a$17 million general obligation bond to fund the purchase of real property for parks and to fund a limited amount of park development. The passage of the 2010 Parks Bond provides funding to enable the development of recently acquired addition to Jack Park. This park project was identified as a high priority project in the Park System Master Plan,the adopted City of Tigard CIP and the Notice of City Measure Election provided to voters regarding the parks bond. The Park System Master Plan is the guiding document of the overall parks bond program, and it describes, by example,the characteristics of a City neighborhood park. Specific design criteria or standards have not been adopted by the City related to park development; however, a site master plan is used to guide the layout and design of proposed public improvements. Stormwater facilities will meet City requirements and Clean Water Services' design standards. All restoration and enhancement projects will meet CWS standards. The proposed park development will include an accessible walking trail connecting the Station 50 community room and the existing, developed portion of Jack Park. An engineered bridge span will enable a connection over and across Krueger Creek,which will result in unimpaired fish • Section 2 2-2 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • passage and eliminate the rogue, demand trails that currently cross the creek.No additional off- street or on-street parking is proposed for the park, but the removal of one parking stall at Station 50 is proposed to enable ADA-accessible routes between the park and the community room. Public Outreach: A community-based site master planning process was initiated in the Spring of 2012 to solicit resident input and guidance toward alternative park design concepts. Two public meetings were held to discuss park design. The first meeting occurred on February 22, 2012 at the Station 50 community room, and two concept drawings were presented for comment and feedback. A second public meeting was conducted to satisfy the requirements of the City's land use code, which was held on April 12, 2012 to solicit additional feedback on the design and permitting of the park project. This meeting was announced via direct mailing to residents within 500' of the site, in addition to postings through site signage, news media and the City's website. The meeting notification, sign-in sheets and responses to questions are provided in Appendix B. The City of Tigard's Parks and Recreation Advisory Board(PRAB)reviewed, considered and recommended the adoption of the conceptual development plan at a regularly scheduled PRAB meeting on May 14, 2012, at which public comment and testimony was welcomed. The PRAB will review the final development plans for this park, and they will provide direction on the project budget and phasing. Proposed Site Plan & Improvements: As noted above and as illustrated on the site plan (Sheets L4.1 -4.2),the first phase of the proposed park development will include an accessible • trail, engineered bridge span and riparian area restoration and enhancement. On-Site Pedestrian Circulation: The development of the park will provide a critical connection between the Station 50 community room and the existing, developed portion of Jack Park. A new, accessible trail and an engineered bridge span will provide safe and convenient pedestrian access through the site. The project provides increased street frontage for Jack Park with access along SW Walnut Street and improves overall neighborhood access for residents living south of the park. The proposed project also requests the removal of one parking stall through re-striping at Station 50 to accommodate a safe, convenient and ADA-accessible entry into the park from the parking lot and to the community room. Landscaping: As a public park,the proposed design takes full advantage of the existing trees and smaller vegetation on site. A significant component of the project is a riparian restoration and enhancement to the Krueger Creek vegetated corridor. Invasive species, such as blackberry, will be removed, and hazard trees will be removed or pruned to address public safety.New landscape plantings are proposed along the riparian areas of the creek to add native vegetation and to enhance the native riparian plant habitat. On-Site Infrastructure Impacts & Improvements: The proposed park construction has very little impact on the site, and modest site grading will occur in small areas as necessary for the trail and bridge. Aside from a small water line to service landscape irrigation, no other utilities or permanent infrastructure will be installed with the project. • Section 2 2-3 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 (1 to - n _I '- i' '" = Jr vg I r + M ...t Jack Park Vicinity Map m a- _f r J J l --- - d -J _i I mo' f} -I --1 j ~' ' r I A ,, , ;:, . _.! ', _..t d .. ` _r -J i am—* v r` f J t .6 .11 t g Sti cams .3 `, i } Parks t Stilk / ,} .�-" -.�! r - lore _ . — ...a - . a '+ti_ J :.-.:.: 3 „„, - ,.,,} N — tit _.IV A (: r ,i< �� f 4 rah f I a ( s J J j —]J _i �„ Lck AEt 3 � —' z.�-� J J Mdl on _7"'— tt W A L N U i I s.. - .., ij'"" _3 , - J1 - .a J _t r J ..1—J _j .,.. .1d -'•! <r YF ` r _ J _..., I f Map printed at tz:as PM on 22-May-12 'J A-3 d.}.d w� DMA i6 OEORDR CV RNVLTIME R-IO.1 E6.ME PTV Of 11WF0 en MACS NC w.MfM CT MMESESTTILT.MI 6'JNWITEE AS-M.. COW..AOCVMCC TNEUEE CM CMMETENEOL of.Erc OF 0 CMlnrCTCCIV Fen 00 TEL 6m a nc M.SIM •cm4EEEn LIM MnT FM AM ERROM OWES OW OR ONOOIR.ICEC W TEE rn-F ....[ -- J {{ J � i j 11 Y OaWT ONPPMW6 RWN0M58 Cf Ec..LwsEV ae CD A 1... B E , T City of Tigard tNr1 C Feet =C C ..I TIGAR qPs 13125 g-a',SW Hal siz"za ,1 2.. N •,f J ad "AS 19ad-or.Fti TIC MAO N A • 410 III • • • 'Z m o0 n C Syr I L 1 S 1'L a Jack Park Zoning Map Fri cucm iv 2 a Streams o d s i-. ArN{N r R-4.5 (HD) i 3. 00 KAREN ST - Parks 3 in m er Zoning ' I I 130,000 Sq Ft Min I,ot R-12 BROOK 1 Size ti I 120,000 Sq Ft Min Lot w Size a I 110,000 Sq Ft Min Lot a Size 12“ti A�E 2 57,500 Sq Ft Min Lot tii N Size c I 15,000 Sq Ft Min Lot R-4.5 c Size r-13,050 Sq Ft Min Lot r7 ' Size tARIE CT I 11,480SgFt Min Lot Size 2 =40 Units Per Acre I 1Mixed Use Residential l WALNUTST 1 1 � z r i Mixed Use Residential 3 2 O MI 1tired T ice Central R-4.5 (PD) n I .1 Y._ut i te.J el 1:J; $ PIA , l-May-12 't _�_ r _, _•_ ...5 O Q 1Q E<G��w W� n 46 W A�r.94F4 4.N O vw. .r- Kuilw Cvi43' o D ALBERTA ST caaigam N C reef 11GAA�APD S125 ii T' is 3tl NO mm[pdrtl-0rgQv TIGAAO F, N N In n In T o WIL• .� ��, 4� .r Jack Park Aerial Mapm P+ 4 a�i d i ' 4 a)arl N +lR.. a 4 t .. - .. . aln ' - W I' x. g �y a. CO -, , .Z" W ,n. z• '''�- :.�i t - r' i' g ` " } r'" tit a 1 ! e," 44 1 _ - Streams co ' ,„a `+r �. '�• ,. .� r, ; `On 'G �. . �. =rz ,. •.fit - Parks iI x. t ; ; 2 1 M - V �1 Ea..1 pad T ., • v.a. ..ALNUJT S vi• - , 4� i7 -.114 ' � f` 41 u as �1 w 1 - 1 -u. r 1 r v' .�umi�g of I •�irA► > " ~' a Map piMed at 11:43 PM on a-May-tt DATA NaDEOVFOEEw.u.nEsouwES'DO ON of Tana, p z " M '• f- um.N r aE�sEN.,oNw cwaw EE ro,NE 'y-- '.z hf a w'�`cuiENr ncvrEev.mEUDIE aeE IIOERD EEm,s nur of Q n !' THE FIRMA EFMIt 0.6910145 7,, -Gu"'',V1 TIDENG • •• { t , T.C.gkTONP.00D.rFw.0.ESS OFNOW GVlEO. F E r r Rt_T ��p crty w nge a ry Feet �€ - �'1 ` r' P limn- 1TrA25 Hon Blvd lops T1p d,O Hon Blv l!, 0 500 i t' mil e , E'r'• 503639J 171 a ' I 4 vmw.hgardar.gov N 01 • I • • Section 3 . Current Conditions a Impact Study Vicinity: Jack Park is comprised of two parcels (Tax Map 2S104AA, Lot 04600 and 2S104AD, Lot 04501) consisting of 7.03 acres located at 12420 SW 127th Avenue. Access to site is from SW 127`h Avenue, SW 128th Avenue and SW Walnut Street. The project site is located in the Tigard Area 11 neighborhood. As per the adopted City of Tigard Parks Master Plan (2009), neighborhood parks are intended to serve residents within a ''/a-to 'h-mile walking distance. When developed,the proposed park will improve the geographic distribution of developed city parks and offer accessible recreation and social opportunities to nearby residents. Zoning: The site is zoned R-4.5, and Community Recreation is permitted as a conditional use according to Table 18.510.1 of the Tigard Development Code.Nearby parcels to the north have R-12 zoning, and parcels to the south, west and east are zoned R-4.5. In 2009, the City of Tigard (applicant)received approval for a Minor Modification to the Conditional Use(MMD2009- 00024) for the recently acquired parcel (TL 04501)adjacent to Station 50 to acknowledge public park enhancements planned for Jack Park addition. The proposed park development project is consistent with the intent of the approved Minor Modification from 2009 and represents the first phase of development to install the trail and bridge. Site Characteristics: The recently acquired parcel (TL 04501) adjacent to Station 50 includes a • small upland shelf(approximately 8,000 s.f.), and the remainder of this parcel slopes northward toward Krueger Creek. Much of the area near the creek is located along a mapped vegetated corridor and riparian habitat. The site contains numerous trees, grasses, understory and other restoration plantings. The parcel (TL 4600)containing the existing, developed portion of Jack Park includes gently sloping land, turf and landscape installations and mature park trees. Due to topographic conditions and the existence of small wetlands, an engineered bridge span will be necessary to cross Krueger Creek. The proposed bridge will completely span the creek and the associated wetlands to avoid impacts to those resources. The soil types on the site include: Cornelius and Kinton silt loam which is moderately well- drained soils with a typical depth to water table of about 27 to 37 inches; Delena silt loam which is a poorly drained soil and located along Krueger Creek, and Cascade silt loam which is a somewhat poorly drained soil and located predominantly in the existing, developed area of Jack Park. The property includes CWS mapped features including sensitive lands and riparian zones. A slope and utility easement exists along the SW Walnut Street frontage, and an electrical transformer and other utilities are located on a small concrete pad fronting Walnut Street. Street improvements along Walnut Street were completed a few years ago by Washington County and include a concrete sidewalk and planting strip with trees and shrubs. • Section 3 3-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Figure 4: Site Photos • ,.. • . 1 - .vim..... Figure 4A—Frontage along Walnut(to east) Figure 4B—Frontage along Walnut(to west) hP i Y J 4�g 3 a+ '''',ZONI. y/ rt Ir µ,, .- 4 Figure 4C—Interior of upland shelf Figure 4D—Adjacent parking at Station 50 , .w,r r re ,. J. - . ar w _ j: - �yy.�4y'... Figure 4E—Krueger Creek at Jack Park Figure 4F—Existing playground at Jack Park • Section 3 3-2 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Impact Study Parks System: The 2009 Tigard Park System Master Plan identifies acquisition, expansion, and/or development of neighborhood parks, community parks and open space adequate to serve the current and projected population of Tigard at the service standards established in the plan. The proposed expansion and improvements to Jack Park will enhance and create additional recreational opportunities for residents of the Tigard Area 11 neighborhood. The proposed park will provide public recreation facilities and offerings that will help meet the community's need for recreation. The proposed trail and engineered bridge provide a critical linkage between the existing area of Jack Park,the community room at Station 50 and neighborhood areas south of Walnut Street. Walking paths will offer an opportunity for exercise and access to Jack Park's many recreational facilities such as picnicking facilities (e.g., shelter, tables),play areas and landscaped areas. Additionally,the proposed site plan provides restoration and enhancement to the existing sensitive natural features. Transportation System: As per the Tigard Park System Master Plan, neighborhood parks anticipate pedestrian and bicycle access as the primary forms of travel to these parks. The proposed park is intended to serve the residents of the immediate Tigard Area 11 neighborhood vicinity, and automobile access to the park is anticipated to be very low. For this reason, the Tigard Development Code does not require parking for city park development, except dog parks. The proposed project proposes no additional on-site or off-site parking. • The proposed development will not trigger additional street improvements, since as these were completed with the development of TVF&R Station 50. Street improvements along Walnut Street are completed and include a concrete sidewalk and planting strip with trees and shrubs. The nearest transit route (TriMet#45) is located one-third mile to the east at Walnut Street and 121 st Avenue. No impacts affecting transit ridership are anticipated from the proposed project. Bikeways: SW Walnut Street, along the frontage of the project site, has been improved and includes a designated bike lane.No impacts affecting this bike lane are anticipated from the proposed project, and the proposed trail and bridge spanning Krueger Creek enhances the pedestrian and bicycle connection between Walnut Street and the neighborhood north of Jack Park. Drainage System: The amount of stormwater runoff generated by proposed, new imperious areas on the project site is minimal. A small bioswale for water quality treatment and discharge will be installed along the western edge of the trail near Station 50 (see Sheet L7.1)to serve as a drainage system for a future playground that will be installed during a subsequent phase of site development. The other areas will sheet flow to pervious areas on the site. Water quality treatment of runoff generated by the trail improvements will be provided by sheet flow across vegetation within the vegetated corridor, similar to a filter strip. Water System: Water service to the site is provided by the City of Tigard Water Division. A • 24"water line exists along SW Walnut Street. The proposed project will require a water line to Section 3 3-3 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 service the needs for a limited irrigation system. A 2"water line will be tapped to the existing • water main located within SW Walnut Street. This service line will connect to a 1-1/2"water meter and backflow preventer near the curb and continue as a 1-1/2"water line to service the park landscape irrigation needs. Sufficient flow and capacity exists within the existing water mains to support this project. The limited nature and seasonality of the water need requirements for the irrigation system is not anticipated to strain the existing water system, and sufficient capacity will be available. Sewer System: An existing 8" sewer runs along Walnut Street. The proposed project will not utilize the sewer system and will have no impacts to sanitary sewer. Fire Suppression: Fire protection is provided by the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue Department(TVF&R), and the project site is immediately adjacent to Station 50. An existing fire hydrant is located within 25' of the property line of the project site.As per the Pre-Application Conference Notes, fire protection services are not necessary for this project. Noise Impacts: Minimal temporary noise would be created at the time of park construction, during normal working hours. Low-level construction noise would be generated from vehicles and equipment used in park construction. Once the park is built and open to the public, low- level,pedestrian type noise is anticipated from the use of the walking paths,playground and community garden. No additional sport fields are proposed for this park, and the range and type of recreation facilities for this neighborhood park likely will not draw large crowds or attract residents from outside the immediate neighborhood area. The type of noise would be in the same • category found in any area frequented by walkers, hikers and bicycle riders. During the period of park construction,work hours will be restricted per City standards, and the use of muffled equipment will be enforced by an on-site construction manager. In the event that unforeseen noise impacts become known during the construction and future use of the park,the applicant will coordinate directly with affected neighbors for enhanced site management and other improvements as appropriate. • Section 3 3-4 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Section 4. Application Narrative The purpose of this section is to demonstrate that the proposed park project meets all the applicable standards and requirements of the Tigard Development Code, Title 18. SUMMARY OF APPLICABLE REGULATIONS As a result of the Pre-Application Conference, City staff directed the applicant to the following applicable Development Code chapters. 18.330—Conditional Use 18.360—Site Development Review 18.390—Decision Making Procedures 18.510—Residential Zones 18.705—Access Egress and Circulation 18.725 —Environmental Performance Standards 18.745 —Landscaping and Screening 18.765 —Off-Street Parking and Loading 18.775—Sensitive Lands 18.790—Tree Removal • 18.795—Visual Clearance 18.810—Street and Utility Improvement Standards Conditional Use (Chapter 18.330) Section 18.330.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures under which a conditional use may be permitted, enlarged or altered if the site is appropriate and if other appropriate conditions of approval can be met. There are certain uses which due to the nature of the impacts on surrounding land uses and public facilities require a case-by-case review and analysis. Response: The applicant requests approval of a modification to an existing site, with a previously-approved Conditional Use. The TVF&R Station 50 development(CUP2007-00003) included the installation of a community room and accompanying parking. The community room and public parking lot were partially financed by the City of Tigard via a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the joint development of the property with TVF&R. The parking lot was designed and constructed with the intent to serve as public parking for the Jack Park addition and the community room. The final approval of the Station 50 CUP stipulated a range in the number of parking stalls allowable to be between 31 and 45 stalls. A total of 39 stalls were included on the approved plans. As part of the proposed park development,the applicant requests a modification of the parking lot to reduce the number of parking stalls by one to accommodate safe, convenient and ADA-accessible entry into the park and connection to the community room. Associated with this parking stall,the applicant requests the removal of a planting strip tree • immediately adjacent to the parking stall because it will conflict with the location of the ADA- Section 4 4-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 compliant trail. The applicant also requests the removal of a deed restriction placed on trees#1, • #3 and#4 as shown on the Tree Preservation and Mitigation Plan(Sheets L1.1 to L1.3)for public safety and ADA-related site design considerations. These trees are no longer part of the TVF&R property or necessary for the overall enhancement of tree canopy given the mitigation plantings along the vegetated corridor or in relation to the planned landscape plantings shown as part of this application. As noted in the updated Arborist Report as part of this application,these trees are in poor condition. The two poor quality apple trees (#1 & #2)will create hazards for park users from falling fruit and conflict with the future location of playground equipment. The sycamore maple (#4) is identified for removal because it is in poor condition with significant limb cavities and conflicts with the location of the proposed trail. Additionally,the two apple trees (#1 &#3) offer little value as either shade trees or fruit producers, and the sycamore maple (#4) is considered an exotic invasive species in much of the U.S. Additionally,the proposed public use trail must meet the requirements of the ADA,which include a maximum longitudinal slope of 5%for its full length. The design team for this project reviewed several alignment options. The only feasible route to align the public trail is illustrated in this application's planset drawings due to the optimal location of the bridge span to avoid wetland impacts and to simultaneously satisfy ADA requirements of a 5%trail slope. The trail alignment will necessitate the removal of trees#1, #3 and #4 due to the need to meet ADA and the requisite site grading. The following standards in this chapter ensure the proposed development will not adversely impact surrounding uses and public facilities. Section 18.330.020 Approval Process • C. Minor modification of approved or existing conditional use. An applicant may request approval of a minor modification by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Subsection C.3 below. A minor modification shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied following the Director's review based on the findings that: a. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title; Finding: The proposed project requests a minor modification to an existing and approved conditional use permit, and the findings detailed in the remainder of this application narrative demonstrate compliance with all applicable requirements of Title 18. b. The modification is not a major modification ...(see Section 18.330.020.B below) Finding: The proposed project is a minor modification to an existing and approved conditional use permit(CUP2007-00003), and will be processed as a Type I procedure as regulated by 18.390.030. Responses to the criteria regarding the determination of a major modification are noted below in the following section. The proposed project does not meet criteria for a major modification and should be deemed a minor modification. Section 18.330.020.B.Major modification of approved or existing conditional use. 2. The Director shall determine that a major modification(s) has resulted if one or more of the changes listed below have been proposed: a. A change in land use; • Section 4 4-2 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 • Finding: The requested modification to CUP2007-0003 is related to the number of parking stalls and the removal of certain trees. No change in land use is proposed. This criterion does not apply. b. A 10%increase in dwelling unit density; Finding: The approved CUP2007-0003 was for a fire station, and no residential units were approved.No residences are proposed, and no increase in dwelling unit density is proposed. This criterion does not apply. c. A change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; Finding: The requested modification is for the removal of one parking stall through striping to accommodate safe ADA access between the community room at Station 50 and the proposed Jack Park addition. The final approval conditions for the Station 50 CUP stipulated a range in the number of parking stalls allowable to be between 31 and 45 stalls. A total of 39 stalls were included on the approved plans. As part of the proposed park development,the applicant requests a modification of the parking lot by means of asphalt striping to reduce by one the number of parking stalls to accommodate safe, convenient and ADA-accessible entry into the park and connection to the community room. The proposed modification will continue to be in accordance with the noted Conditions of Approval for CUP2007-0003.No physical change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas is proposed where off-site traffic would be affected. This criterion does not apply. • d. An increase in the floor area proposed for non-residential use by more than 10%where previously specified; Finding: No increase in the floor area for Station 50 and the associated community room is proposed. This criterion does not apply. e. A reduction of more than 10%of the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space; Finding: The approved CUP2007-00003 did not require common open space; therefore, no reduction in the area for open space is proposed. This criterion does not apply. f. A reduction of specified setback requirements by more than 20%; Finding: No adjustment to the site layout or to building locations is proposed;therefore no reduction of setback requirements is requested. This criterion does not apply. g. An elimination of project amenities by more than 10%where previously specified provided such as: (1)Recreational facilities; (2)Screening; or (3)Landscaping provisions; Finding: The requested modification is for the removal of one parking stall through striping and an adjacent planting area tree to accommodate safe ADA access between the community room at Station 50 and the proposed Jack Park addition. The proposed removal of one tree • west of the parking lot to facilitate the ADA trail connection represents the removal of a Section 4 4-3 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 screening amenity; however, the planting plan for CUP2007-00003 indicated a total of 28 • trees to be planted on site, and the removal of a single tree falls below the 10%threshold noted in this provision.Additionally,the applicant requests the removal of three trees(#1, #3 &#4),which are located off of the TVF&R property. The removal of these three trees when compared to the sum of the protected trees and new trees planted as part of the Station 50 project also falls below the 10%threshold noted in this provision.No change to or elimination of project amenities for recreational facilities is proposed. This criterion does not apply. h. A 10% increase in the approved density; Finding: The approved CUP2007-0003 was for a fire station, and no residential units were approved.No residences are proposed, and no increase in density is proposed. This criterion does not apply. Section 18.330.050(B)Additional Development Standards for Conditional Use Types 5.) Community Recreation and Parks a. All building setbacks shall be a minimum of 30 feet from any property line Finding: No building structures are proposed on the site. This criterion does not apply. b. There are no off-street parking requirements, except ...for a dog park or off-leash area Finding: The proposed park will not be a designated dog park, and there will not be any sort of fenced enclosure where dogs are allowed off-leash. This approval criterion does not apply to the project. . Site Development Review(Chapter 18.360) 18.360.020 Applicability of Provisions A. Applicability and exemptions. Site development review shall be applicable to all new developments and major modification of existing developments, as provided in Section 18.360.050, except it shall not apply to... 5. Any proposed development which has a valid conditional use approved through the conditional use permit application process; Finding: Site development review of the proposed park improvements located on TL 04501 and TL 04600 is exempt, since these proposed improvements are consistent with a valid conditional use approved through the conditional use permit application process(MMD2009-00024). The proposed adjustment to the adjacent Station 50 parking lot does trigger a minor modification of CUP2007-00003, and the remainder of the SDR narrative is specifically directed toward that proposed change. Section 18.360.030 Approval Process B. Minor modifications. Minor modifications of an approved plan or existing developments, as defined in Section 18.360.060, shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.360.060. • Section 4 4-4 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Finding: The SDR for the proposed adjustment to the parking lot at Station 50 is being reviewed in conjunction with the Type 1 minor modification to CUP2007-00003 for TVF&R Station 50. This provision is advisory. Section 18.360.060 Minor Modification(s)to Approved Plans or Existing Development A. Minor modification defined. Any modification which is not within the description of a major modification as provided in Section 18.360.050 shall be considered a minor modification. Finding: The proposed adjustment to the parking lot at Station 50 represents a minor modification to the previously approved CUP2007-00003, and it does not meet the definition of a major modification as noted below. This provision is met. B. Process.An applicant may request approval of a minor modification in accordance with Section 18.360.030.B and as follows: 1. Providing the Director with three copies of the proposed modified site development plan; Finding: Three copies of the proposed modified site development plan illustrating the adjustment to parking stalls at Station 50 have been submitted with this application. This provision is met. 2. A narrative which indicates the rationale for the proposed modification addressing the changes listed in Section 18.360.050.B. Finding: The narrative below addresses the changes listed in Section 18.360.050.B. This provision is met. • Section 18.360.050.B. Evaluation criteria. The Director shall determine that a major modification(s) will result if one or more of the following changes are proposed. 1. An increase in dwelling unit density, or lot coverage for residential development; Finding: The approved CUP2007-0003 was for a fire station, and no residential units were approved.No residences are proposed, and no increase in dwelling unit density or lot coverage is proposed. This criterion does not apply. 2. A change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units; Finding: The approved CUP2007-0003 was for a fire station, and no residential units were approved.No residences are proposed, and no change in the ratio or number of different types of dwelling units is proposed. This criterion does not apply. 3. A change that requires additional on-site parking in accordance with Chapter 18.765; Finding: The proposal is to reduce the number of on-site parking stalls by one, from 39 to 38 to accommodate safe ADA access between the park and the fire station.No increase in on-site parking is proposed. This criterion does not apply. 4.A change in the type of commercial or industrial structures as defined by the Uniform Building Code; Finding: The approved CUP2007-0003 was for a fire station. No change in the type of structure is proposed. This criterion does not apply. • 5. An increase in the height of the building(s) by more than 20%; Section 4 4-5 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Finding: The approved CUP2OO7-0003 was for a fire station, and no residential units • were approved.No residences or changes in building heights are proposed. This criterion does not apply. 6. A change in the type and location of accessways and parking areas where off-site traffic would be affected; Finding: The requested modification is for the removal of one parking stall through striping to accommodate safe ADA access between the community room at Station 50 and the proposed Jack Park addition (Sheet L4.2). The final Conditions of Approval for the Station 50 CUP (CUP20O7-0003) stipulated a range in the number of parking stalls allowable to be between 31 and 45 stalls. A total of 39 stalls were included on the approved plans. As part of the proposed park development,the applicant requests a modification of the parking lot by means of asphalt striping to reduce the number of parking stalls by one to accommodate safe, convenient and ADA-accessible entry into the park and connection to the community room. The proposed modification will continue to be in accordance with the noted Conditions of Approval for CUP2O07-0003.No physical change in the type and/or location of access ways and parking areas is proposed where off-site traffic would be affected. This criterion does not apply. 7. An increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site and the increase can be expected to exceed 100 vehicles per day; Finding: The approved CUP2OO7-0003 was for a fire station and associated community room. No changes to the building structure or its uses are proposed, and no significant • increase in vehicular traffic is anticipated. The proposed neighborhood park development is expected to generate trips from the surrounding neighborhood, and the limited trail and bridge improvements are not anticipated to attract users from outside the immediate neighborhood. The ITE Trip Generation Manual has limited information given for parks, especially small neighborhood parks. This project is designed to encourage increased pedestrian activity. Based upon previous trip generation studies conducted within the greater Portland metro region, average peak hour trip end rates have been estimated at approximately 1.65 per acre of neighborhood parkland. The proposed development is a 7.03-acre neighborhood park,and the anticipated peak trips generated is less than twelve. This criterion does not apply. 8. An increase in the floor area proposed for a nonresidential use by more than 10% excluding expansions under 5,000 square feet; Finding: No increase in the floor area for Station 50 and the associated community room is proposed. This criterion does not apply. 9. A reduction in the area reserved for common open space and/or usable open space which reduces the open space area below the minimum required by this code or reduces the open space area by more than 10%; Finding: The approved CUP2OO7-00003 did not require common open space; therefore, no reduction in the area for open space is proposed. This criterion does not apply. • Section 4 4-6 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 • 10. A reduction of project amenities below the minimum established by this code or by more than 10%where specified in the site plan: a. Recreational facilities; b. Screening; and/or c. Landscaping provisions. Finding: The requested modification is for the removal of one parking stall through striping and an adjacent planting area tree to accommodate safe ADA access between the community room at Station 50 and the proposed Jack Park addition. The proposed removal of one tree west of the parking lot to facilitate the ADA trail connection represents the removal of a screening amenity; however,the planting plan for CUP2007- 00003 indicated a total of 28 trees to be planted on site, and the removal of a single tree falls below the 10%threshold noted in this provision. Additionally,the applicant requests the removal of three trees (#1,#3 & #4),which are located off of the TVF&R property. The removal of these three trees when compared to the sum of the protected trees and new trees planted as part of the Station 50 project also falls below the 10%threshold noted in this provision.No change to or elimination of project amenities for recreational facilities is proposed. This criterion does not apply. 11. A modification to the conditions imposed at the time of site development review approval which are not the subject of Subsections B.1 through 10 above of this section. Finding: In addition to the requested removal of one parking stall for enhanced ADA connectivity between the park and community room, a single planting strip tree is • requested for removal. This tree is immediately west of the parking stall and in direct conflict with the proposed pathway and ADA connection.No other design alternatives exist that result in a straight alignment between the proposed parking stall for striping and the existing ADA zone on the opposite side of the parking lot. As part of the park development project, additional trees, shrubs and landscaping will be installed to enhance the vegetative condition of the site. C. Approval criteria. A minor modification shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied following the Director's review based on the finding that: 1. The proposed development is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this title; Finding: Documentation of compliance with all applicable provisions of Chapter 18, as identified in the Pre-Application Conference notes, is provided in the remainder of this section. This provision will be met. 2. The modification is not a major modification. Finding: As documented above,the proposed project is a minor modification and does not meet any of the determination criteria for a major modification noted in Section 18.360.050.B. This criterion is met. • Section 4 4-7 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Decision-Making Procedures (Chapter 18.390) • Section 18.390.040 Type H Procedures A. Pre-application conference. A pre-application conference is required for Type II actions. Finding: The PAC notes for this application are contained in Appendix A. B. Application requirements 1. Application forms. Type I applications shall be made on forms provided by the Director as provided by Section 18.390.080.E.1. Finding: The appropriate application materials have been submitted. 2. Submittal Information. Type II applications shall: a. Include the information requested on the application form. Finding: Compliance will be achieved as demonstrated by the completeness letter. b. Address the relevant criteria in sufficient detail for review and action. Finding: All of the relevant approval criteria are addressed. Documentation of compliance has been achieved as demonstrated by the completeness letter. c. Be accompanied by the required fee. Finding: The required fee has been submitted. d. Include two sets of pre-stamped,pre-addressed envelopes for all persons who are • property owners of record as specified in Section 18.390.040.C. Finding: The two sets of envelopes will be submitted following receipt of the completeness letter. e. Include an impact study. Finding: The impact study is provided in Section 3. The study addresses the transportation, drainage, parks,water, sewer systems, as well as bikeway and noise impacts of the proposed park development. This provision is met. Residential Zoning Districts (Chapter 18.510) Section 18.510.050 Development Standards A. Compliance required. All development must comply with: 1. All of the applicable development standards contained in the underlying zoning district, except where the applicant has obtained variances or adjustments in accordance with Chapters 18.370. 2. All other applicable standards and requirements contained in this title. Finding: As demonstrated in the remainder of this narrative and impact study, all applicable standards and requirements are shown to be met. B. Development standards. Development standards in residential zoning districts are contained in Table 18.510.2. • Section 4 4-8 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Criteria from Table 18.510.2 Standard(R-4.5) Subject Property Minimum Lot Size 7,500 s.f. 306,227 s.f. Average Minimum Lot Width 50 ft. 200 ft. Maximum Lot Coverage — — Minimum Setbacks Front yard 20 ft. 315 ft.-bridge Side facing street on corner&through lots 15 ft. NA Side yard 5 ft. 152 ft.-bridge Rear yard 15 ft. 520 ft. -bridge Side or rear yard abutting more restrictive zoning district Distance between property line and front of garage 20 ft. NA—no garage Maximum Height 30 ft. 4 ft.-bridge Minimum Landscape Requirement — — Finding: As shown in the applicant's narrative,planset and in the comparative table above, the proposed development meets all of the applicable development standards of the underlying R-4.5 zoning district. This approval criterion is met. Access,Egress And Circulation (Chapter 18.705) • 18.705.020 Applicability of Provisions A. When provisions apply. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all development including the construction of new structures, the remodeling of existing structures (see Section 18.360.050), and to a change of use which increases the on-site parking or loading requirements or which changes the access requirements. Finding: The provisions of this chapter apply to this application due to the proposed construction of a bridge spanning Krueger Creek.No vehicular access is proposed for the park. The City has a memorandum of understanding with TVF&R for use of the adjacent parking lot serving the community room at Station 50. No changes to the existing access location to SW Walnut Street are proposed. 18.705.030 General Provisions A. Continuing obligation of property owner. The provisions and maintenance of access and egress stipulated in this title are continuing requirements for the use of any structure or parcel of real property in the City. Finding: As illustrated on the proposed site plan(Sheets L4.1 &L4.2), no new vehicular access is planned in the future development of this park property,which will serve the residents of the immediate neighborhood vicinity. Vehicular access and egress will occur via the adjacent parking lot associated with the TVF&R Station 50. Pedestrian access to site is from SW 127th Avenue, SW 124th Avenue, SW 128th Avenue and SW Walnut Street. This requirement does not apply. B. Access plan requirements. No building or other permit shall be issued until scaled plans are • presented and approved as provided by this chapter that show how access, egress and Section 4 4-9 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 circulation requirements are to be fulfilled. The applicant shall submit a site plan. The Director • shall provide the applicant with detailed information about this submission requirement. Finding:No vehicular access or egress is planned on the subject parcels, and no structures necessitating vehicular traffic are proposed. A site plan has been provided with the application materials to demonstrate the location, width and flow of pedestrian access across the site and relating to the adjacent parking lot at Station 50. This requirement is met. C. Joint access. Owners of two or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may agree to utilize jointly the same access and egress when the combined access and egress of both uses, structures, or parcels of land satisfies the combined requirements as designated in this title... Finding: This proposal pertains to a single owner. Joint access provisions do not apply. D. Public street access.All vehicular access and egress as required in Sections 18.705.030.H and 18.705.030.1 shall connect directly with a public or private street approved by the City for public use and shall be maintained at the required standards on a continuous basis. Finding: As illustrated on the proposed site plan (Sheets L4.1 &L4.2), no vehicular access and egress to a public or private street approved by the City for public use is planned in the future development of the park parcels. Vehicular access to a public street exists at the adjacent parking lot at Station 50, which will provide parking for the proposed park. This requirement does not apply. E. Curb cuts. Curb cuts shall be in accordance with Section 18.810.030.N. Finding: As illustrated on the proposed site plan(Sheets L4.1 &L4.2), no vehicular access and • egress is planned for the park parcels,and no curb cuts are proposed. This requirement does not apply. F. Required walkway location. On-site pedestrian walkways shall comply with the following standards: 1. Walkways shall extend from the ground floor entrances or from the ground floor landing of stairs, ramps, or elevators of all commercial, institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways shall be constructed between new and existing developments and neighboring developments; Finding: This application is not regarding a commercial, institutional, or industrial use; the proposed park development is a civic use. The proposed design includes a trail and an engineered bridge span. Pathways are designed to provide access to and between these public improvements. This requirement does not apply. 2. Within all attached housing(except two-family dwellings) and multi family developments, each residential dwelling shall be connected by walkway to the vehicular parking area, and common open space and recreation facilities; Finding: The proposed park development is a civic use. This requirement does not apply. 3. Wherever required walkways cross vehicle access driveways or parking lots, such crossings shall be designed and located for pedestrian safety. Required walkways shall be • Section 4 4-10 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • physically separated from motor vehicle traffic and parking by either a minimum six-inch vertical separation (curbed) or a minimum three-foot horizontal separation, except that pedestrian crossings of traffic aisles are permitted for distances no greater than 36 feet if appropriate landscaping,pavement markings, or contrasting pavement materials are used. Walkways shall be a minimum offour feet in width, exclusive of vehicle overhangs and obstructions such as mailboxes, benches, bicycle racks, and sign posts, and shall be in compliance with ADA standards; Finding:No new vehicular access, egress or parking lots are planned for the park parcels. No new walkways as described in 18.705.030.F(1) &F(2)above are required for this project. This requirement does not apply. 4. Required walkways shall be paved with hard surfaced materials such as concrete, asphalt, stone, brick, other pervious paving surfaces, etc. Any pervious paving surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. Walkways may be required to be lighted and/or signed as needed for safety purposes. Soft-surfaced public use pathways may be provided only if such pathways are provided in addition to required pathways. Finding: Although no new walkways as described in 18.705.030.F(1)&F(2) above are required for this project, the proposed design includes a hard surface walkway (e.g.,trail) and bridge spanning Krueger Creek. The walkway is designed to drain to adjacent parkland. Per City municipal code,the park will close at dusk, therefore, additional safety lighting is not required. However, low-level, solar powered lighting may be installed along the trail for added safety and surveillance • Environmental Performance Standards (Chapter 18.725) Section 18.725.020 General Provisions A. Compliance with applicable state and federal regulations. In addition to the regulations adopted in this chapter, each use, activity or operation within the City of Tigard shall comply with the applicable state and federal standards pertaining to noise, odor and discharge of matter into the atmosphere, ground, sewer system or stream. Regulations adopted by the State Environmental Quality Commission pertaining to non point source pollution control and contained in the Oregon Administrative Rules shall by this reference be made a part of this chapter. Finding: The only additional regulations that apply to the proposed project are related to stormwater management that is the province of Clean Water Services (CWS),which enforces its stormwater manual across much of the county. Compliance with CWS regulations is described in Section 3. Generally, this provision does not apply. B. Evidence of compliance. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Director may require submission of evidence demonstrating compliance with state,federal and local environmental regulations and receipt of necessary permits; these include Air Contaminant Discharge Permits (ACDP) or Indirect Source Construction Permits (ISCP). Finding: Except for on-site stormwater,this provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-11 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 C. Continuing obligation. Compliance with state,federal and local environmental regulations is • the continuing obligation of the property owner and operator. Finding: Advisory. This provision generally does not apply. Section 18.725.030 Performance Standards A. Noise. For the purposes of noise regulation, the provisions of Sections 7.40.130 through 7.40.210 of the Tigard Municipal Code shall apply. Finding: As a public park, low-level,pedestrian type noise is anticipated from the use of the trail.No additional sport fields or playgrounds are proposed, and the range and type of recreation facilities for this neighborhood park likely will not draw large crowds or attract residents from outside the immediate neighborhood area,thereby minimizing the potential for noise disruptions for adjacent neighbors. The type of noise would be in the same category found in any area frequented by walkers, hikers and bicycle riders. Any anticipated level of noise associated with the park use will be within acceptable limits. In the event that unforeseen noise impacts become known during the construction and future use of the park, the applicant will coordinate directly with affected neighbors for enhanced site management and other improvements as appropriate. B. Visible emissions. Within the commercial zoning districts and the industrial park (IP) zoning district, there shall be no use, operation or activity which results in a stack or other point source emission, other than an emission from space heating, or the emission of pure uncombined water (steam)which is visible from a property line. Department of Environmental Quality(DEQ) rules for visible emissions (340-21-015 and 340-28-070) apply. Finding: The proposed project is a public park, which will have no activities that would result in . visible emissions. This provision does not apply. C. Vibration. No vibration other than that caused by highway vehicles, trains and aircraft is permitted in any given zoning district which is discernible without instruments at the property line of the use concerned Finding: The proposed project is a public park,which will have no activities that would result in vibration. This provision does not apply. D. Odors. The emission of odorous gases or other matter in such quantities as to be readily detectable at any point beyond the property line of the use creating the odors is prohibited DEQ rules for odors (340-028-090)apply. Finding: The proposed project is a public park,which will have no activities that would result in odors. This provision does not apply. E. Glare and heat. No direct or sky-reflected glare, whether from floodlights or from high temperature processes such as combustion or welding, which is visible at the lot line shall be permitted, and; 1. There shall be no emission or transmission of heat or heated air which is discernible at the lot line of the source; and 2. These regulations shall not apply to signs or floodlights in parking areas or construction equipment at the time of construction or excavation work otherwise permitted by this title. Finding: The proposed project is a public park, which will have no activities that would result in undue glare and heat. This provision does not apply. . Section 4 4-12 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 • F. Insects and rodents. All materials including wastes shall be stored and all grounds shall be maintained in a manner which will not attract or aid the propagation of insects or rodents or create a health hazard. Finding: As per standard city park maintenance practices,the waste containers will be accessible for collection by maintenance staff daily. Park maintenance staff will manage the disposal of refuse and other "wet" garbage in the industrially-acceptable manner that prevents any potential vector infestation. This provision will be met. Landscaping and Screening(Chapter 18.745) Section 18.745.030 General Provisions A. Obligation to maintain. Unless otherwise provided by the lease agreement, the owner, tenant and his agent if any, shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping and screening which shall be maintained in good condition so as to present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance, shall be replaced or repaired as necessary, and shall be kept free from refuse and debris. Finding: As a City facility , the City of Tigard parks maintenance staff will maintain the subject site as required by this regulation. This provision is met. B. Pruning required. All plant growth in landscaped areas of developments shall be controlled • by pruning, trimming or otherwise so that: 1. It will not interfere with the maintenance or repair of any public utility. 2. It will not restrict pedestrian or vehicular access. 3. It will not constitute a traffic hazard because of reduced visibility. Finding: As part of maintaining its on-site landscaping, City park maintenance staff will prune and trim landscaping so that it will not interfere with maintenance and repair of public utilities; not restrict pedestrian access; nor impede visibility, in compliance with these provisions. C. Installation requirements. The installation of all landscaping shall be as follows: 1. All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted planting procedures. Finding: The landscaping plan(Sheets L7.1 -L7.3) for the proposed park includes standard installation guidelines used by the industry to which the applicant will adhere during installation. 2. The plant materials shall be of high grade, and shall meet the size and grading standards of the American Standards for Nurberg Stock(ANSI Z60, 1-1986, and any future revisions). Finding: Plant materials will be obtained from a certified landscaping purveyor to meet the size and grade standards for each specimen, in compliance with these requirements. 3. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of this title. Finding: See below for further information. • Section 4 4-13 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 D. Certificate of occupancy. Certificates of occupancy shall not be issued unless the landscaping • requirements have been met or other arrangements have been made and approved by the City such as the posting of a bond. Finding: The applicant understands that the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be granted until the required landscaping is installed, inspected and approved by the City. E. Protection of existing vegetation. Existing vegetation on a site shall be protected as much as possible: 1. The developer shall provide methods for the protection of existing vegetation to remain during the construction process; and 2. The plants to be saved shall be noted on the landscape plans (e.g., areas not to be disturbed can be fenced, as in snow fencing which can be placed around individual trees). Finding: The tree preservation and mitigation plan(Sheets L1.1 - L1.3) includes information that illustrates the measures taken to protect existing vegetation, in compliance with this requirement. The landscaping plan(Sheets L7.1 -L7.3)notes the existing vegetation to be preserved, except for 17 trees identified for removal due to poor tree health and/or unavoidable conflicts with the proposed site development. Mitigation requirements for these trees are addressed below in findings pertaining to Chapter 18.790. This requirement is met. F. Care of landscaping along public rights-of-way. Appropriate methods for the care and maintenance of street trees and landscaping materials shall be provided by the owner of the property abutting the rights-of-way unless otherwise required for emergency conditions and the safety of the general public. • Finding: The applicant acknowledges that it has the obligation for care of street trees and other vegetation within the public right-of-way along the park's frontage. City park maintenance staff will provide ongoing and consistent care and maintenance of the site's landscaping and vegetation. This provision will be met. G. Conditions of approval of existing vegetation. The review procedures and standards for required landscaping and screening shall be specified in the conditions of approval during development review and in no instance shall be less than that required for conventional development. Finding: This provision is advisory. H. Height restrictions abutting public rights-of-way. No trees, shrubs or plantings more than 18 inches in height shall be planted in the public right-of-way abutting roadways having no established curb and gutter. Finding: No plantings are proposed within the right-of-way. This provision does not apply. Section 18.745.040 Street Trees A. Protection of existing vegetation. All development projects fronting on a public street,private street or a private driveway more than 100 feet in length approved after the adoption of this title shall be required to plant street trees in accordance with the standards in Section 18.745.040.C. • Section 4 4-14 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 • Finding: Street trees along SW Walnut Street were planted with the improvements to this street several years ago by Washington County. The existing street trees were planted consistent with these requirements.No new street trees are proposed for this project. The provision is met. B. Street tree planting list. Certain trees can severely damage utilities, streets and sidewalks or can cause personal injury. Approval of any planting list shall be subject to review by the Director. Finding: As illustrated in the Existing Conditions Plan(Sheet L0.1),the frontage along SW Walnut Street previously has been improved to include street trees consistent with this provision. This requirement is met. C. Size and spacing of street trees 1. Landscaping in the front and exterior side yards shall include trees with a minimum caliper of two inches at four feet in height as specified in the requirements stated in Section 18.745.040.C.2 below. Finding: As illustrated in the Existing Conditions Plan(Sheet L0.1),the frontage along SW Walnut Street previously has been improved to include street trees consistent with this provision. This requirement is met. 2. The specific spacing of street trees by size of tree shall be as follows... (a.-c.) Finding: As illustrated in the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet L0.1),the frontage along SW Walnut Street previously has been improved to include street trees consistent with this • provision. This requirement is met. d. Except for signalized intersections as provided in Section 18.745.040.H, trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet from a street intersection/nor closer than two feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the sidewalk),fire hydrants or utility poles to maintain visual clearance. e. No new utility pole location shall be established closer than five feet to any existing street tree. f. Tree pits shall be located so as not to include utilities (e.g., water and gas meters) in the tree well. g. On premises utilities (e.g., water and gas meters)shall not be installed within existing tree well areas. h. Street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards. i. New light standards shall not be positioned closer than 20 feet to existing street trees except when public safety dictates, then they may be positioned no closer than 10 feet. j. Where there are overhead power lines, the street tree species selected shall be of a type which, at full maturity, will not interfere with the lines. k. Trees shall not be planted within two feet from the face of the curb. 1. Trees shall not be planted within two feet of any permanent hard surface paving or walkway: Finding: As illustrated in the Existing Conditions Plan(Sheet L0.1),the frontage along SW Walnut Street previously has been improved to include street trees consistent with this provision. These requirements are met. • Section 4 4-15 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 D. Pruning requirements. Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least eight feet of • clearance above sidewalks and 13 feet above local street, 15 feet above collector street, and 18 feet above arterial street roadway surfaces. Finding: As part of its obligation to maintain plantings in the public right-of-way along its street frontage [Section 18.745.030(F)],the applicant will prune trees in the manner required above to insure adequate sight distances. E. Cut and fill around existing trees. Existing trees may be used as street trees if no cutting or filling takes place within the drip-line of the tree unless an adjustment is approved by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C.4.a. Finding: As noted in the Pre-application Conference Notes, street improvements are not required of the proposed project. The existing street trees located within the planter strip along SW Walnut Street will not be disturbed. This provision does not apply. F. Replacement of street trees. Existing street trees removed by development projects or other construction shall be replaced by the developer.... Finding: No existing street trees will be removed as part of the proposed project. This requirement does not apply. G. Granting of adjustments. Adjustments to the street tree requirements may be granted by the Director by means of a Type I procedure, as regulated in Section 18.390.030, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.020.C6.b. • Finding: The applicant does not seek adjustments to these standards. This provision does not apply. H. Location of trees near signalized intersections.... Finding: There are no signalized intersections near the site. This provision does not apply. Section 18.745.050 Buffering and Screening A. General provisions 1. It is the intent that these requirements shall provide for privacy and protection and reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts of visual or noise pollution at a development site, without unduly interfering with the view from neighboring properties or jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians and vehicles. Finding: The proposed park improvements would enhance the pedestrian experience with improved trail access through the park and perimeter landscaping to provide enhanced separation from surrounding uses, including the fire station to the east.No solid fences or hedges are proposed that would interfere with views from neighboring properties. This provision is met. 2. Buffering and screening is required to reduce the impacts on adjacent uses which are of a different type in accordance with the matrices in this chapter(Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2). The owner of each proposed development is responsible for the installation and effective maintenance of buffering and screening. When different uses would be abutting one another • Section 4 4-16 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • except for separation by a right-of-way, buffering, but not screening, shall be required as specified in the matrix. Finding: The proposed use is Community Recreation, which is not a listed use in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2, and no parking lots are proposed. This provision does not apply. 3. In lieu of these standards, a detailed buffer area landscaping and screening plan may be submitted for the Director's approval as an alternative to the buffer area landscaping and screening standards,provided it affords the same degree of buffering and screening as required by this code. Finding: The proposed use is Community Recreation, which is not a listed use in Tables 18.745.1 and 18.745.2. This provision does not apply; however,the landscaping plan (Sheets L7.1 -L7.3) illustrate significant revegetation of the riparian zone, in general compliance with the intent of this subsection. B. Buffering and screening requirements (1-9) Finding: The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1 or 18.745.2. The underlying residential zoning classification is the same on the subject parcel as it is on the adjacent parcels to the east and west. Therefore,the buffering and screening requirements do not apply. C. Setbacks for fences or walls (1-4) Finding: Although not required for buffering or screening, an existing, 3'high,wood split rail fence is located approximately 6' west of the property edge near the Station 50 parking lot. As • illustrated on the Layout Plan (Sheet L4.1),this application proposes to re-locate the split rail fence to the property edge with Station 50. The existing fence will be re-aligned and re-installed in its current dimensions. At the proposed height of 3 feet,this side yard fence will be within the allowable height restrictions. The proposed fence will not interfere with visual clearance requirements, and as demonstrated in the remainder of this narrative,the provisions of Chapter 18.795 have been met. The requirements regarding the setbacks for walls and fences have been met. D. Height restrictions (1-2) Finding: The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1 or 18.745.2.No fences,walls or landscaping are required for buffering and screening for the proposed park project. Therefore, the buffering and screening requirements do not apply. E. Screening: special provisions (1-4) Finding: This application does not include new parking or loading areas. This standard does not apply. F. Buffer matrix(1-2) Finding: The proposed park use is not identified in Table 18.745.1 or 18.745.2. Therefore,the buffering and screening requirements do not apply. • Section 4 4-17 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Section 18.745.060 Re-vegetation • A. When re-vegetation is required. Where natural vegetation has been removed through grading in areas not affected by the landscaping requirements and that are not to be occupied by structures, such areas are to be replanted as set forth in this section to prevent erosion after construction activities are completed. Finding: The proposed Landscaping Plan(Sheets L7.1 -L7.3) illustrate all proposed landscaped areas, including those re-planted following construction, in compliance with this requirement. This provision is met. B. Preparation for re-vegetation. Topsoil removed from the surface in preparation for grading and construction is to be stored on or near the sites and protected from erosion while grading operations are underway. Finding: As part of the instructions by the applicant's consulting landscape architect, the measures governing re-vegetation will be undertaken in compliance with these requirements. C. Methods of re-vegetation 1. Acceptable methods of re-vegetation include hydro-mulching or the planting of rye grass, barley, or other seed with equivalent germination rates, and: a. Where lawn or turf grass is to be established, lawn grass seed or other appropriate landscape cover is to be sown at not less than four pounds to each 1,000 square feet of land area; b. Other re-vegetation methods offering equivalent protection may be approved by the approval authority; • c. Plant materials are to be watered at intervals sufficient to ensure survival and growth; and d. The use of native plant materials is encouraged to reduce irrigation and maintenance demands. Finding: As part of the instructions by the applicant's consulting landscape architect, these measures governing re-vegetation will be undertaken in compliance with these requirements. Off-Street Parking and Loading(Chapter 18.765) Section 18.765.030 General Provisions (A-H) A. Vehicle parking plan requirements B. Location of vehicle parking C. Joint parking D. Parking in mixed-use projects E. Visitor parking in multifamily residential developments F. Preferential long-term carpool/vanpool parking G. Disabled-accessible parking H. DEQ indirect source construction permit Finding: Chapter 18.330.050.B(5)directs that there are no off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation, except for dog parks. The proposed project is not, and does not contain, a dog park. This provision and the remaining provisions(A-H) of this subsection do not apply. • Section 4 4-18 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Section 18.765.040 General Design Standards(A-N) A. Maintenance of parking areas B. Access drives C. Loading/unloading driveways D. On-site vehicle stacking for drive-in use E. Curb cuts F. Pedestrian access G. Parking lot landscaping H. Parking space surfacing L Parking lot striping J. Wheel stops K. Drainage L. Lighting M. Signs N. Space and aisle dimensions Finding: Chapter 18.330.050.B(5) directs that there are no off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation, except for dog parks. The proposed project is not, and does not contain, a dog park. This provision and the remaining provisions (A-N) of this subsection do not apply. Section 18.765.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards A. Location and access. With regard to the location and access to bicycle parking: • 1. Bicycle parking areas shall be provided at locations within 50 feet of primary entrances to structures; Finding: As illustrated on the site plan(Sheet L4.1), a bicycle parking area containing three bike racks is located adjacent to the trail.No structures or buildings are proposed on site. This provision does not apply. 2. Bicycle parking areas shall not be located within parking aisles, landscape areas or pedestrian ways; Finding: As illustrated on the site plan(Sheet L4.1),the proposed bicycle parking area is not located within a parking aisle, landscape area or pedestrian way. This provision is met. 3. Outdoor bicycle parking shall be visible from on-site buildings and/or the street. When the bicycle parking area is not visible from the street, directional signs shall be used to located the parking area; Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area will be visible from SW Walnut and from the parking lot at Station 50. This provision is met. 4. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor which has an outdoor entrance open for use and floor location which does not require the bicyclist to use stairs to gain access to the space. Exceptions may be made to the latter requirement for parking on upper stories within a multi-story residential building. Finding: No enclosed buildings are proposed in which bicycle parking could be located. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-19 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 B. Covered parking spaces. • 1. When possible, bicycle parking facilities should be provided under cover. Finding: Advisory. The proposed bicycle parking is located outdoors in the central open space of a future city park. Covered bicycle parking is not practicable for this location or use. 2. Required bicycle parking for uses served by a parking structure must provide for covered bicycle parking unless the structure will be more than 100 feet from the primary entrance to the building, in which case, the uncovered bicycle parking may be provided closer to the building entrance. Finding: No parking structure is proposed. This provision does not apply. C. Design requirements. The following design requirements apply to the installation of bicycle racks: 1. The racks required for required bicycle parking spaces shall ensure that bicycles may be securely locked to them without undue inconvenience. Provision of bicycle lockers for long- term (employee)parking is encouraged but not required; Finding: The applicant has selected a bicycle rack system that meets this requirement. 2. Bicycle racks must be securely anchored to the ground, wall or other structure; Finding: The proposed bike racks will be installed with concrete footings to securely anchor them to the site. This provision will be met. 3. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least 21/2 feet by six feet long, and, when covered, with a • vertical clearance of seven feet. An access aisle of at least five feet wide shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking; Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area is 6-V2 feet wide by 10 feet long. A single row of bike racks is proposed. This provision is met. 4. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without moving another bicycle; Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area has been designed to meet this requirement as illustrated on the site plan (Sheet L4.2). S. Required bicycle parking spaces may not be rented or leased except where required motor vehicle parking is rented or leased. At-cost or deposit fees for bicycle parking are exempt from this requirement; Finding: As a future city park,there are no plans to rent or lease the required bicycle racks. This requirement will be met. 6. Areas set aside for required bicycle parking must be clearly reserved for bicycle parking only. Finding: The proposed bicycle parking area is reserved for this parking function only, in compliance with this provision. D. Paving. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced with a hard surfaced material, i.e.,pavers, asphalt, concrete, other pervious paving surfaces, or similar material. This surface must be designed and maintained to remain well-drained. • Section 4 4-20 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 • Finding: The proposed bike racks will be installed with concrete footings and will be located within a pervious, '/d'minus gravel, hard-surfaced area adjacent to the trail. This provision will be met. E. Minimum bicycle parking requirements. The total number of required bicycle parking spaces for each use is specified in Table 18.768.2 in Section 18.765.070.H. In no case shall there be less than two bicycle parking spaces. Single-family residences and duplexes are excluded from the bicycle parking requirements. The Director may reduce the number of required bicycle parking spaces by means of an adjustment to be reviewed through a Type II procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.370.020.C.5.e. Finding: According to Table 18.768.2, the minimum bicycle parking for Community Recreation is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of floor area, or 2 spaces. There are no structures proposed for this site. Three racks are proposed as noted on Sheet L4.1 and Detail Sheet L8.2. This standard is met. Section 18.765.060 Parking Structure Design Standards(A-D) A. Ground floor windows/wall openings B. Exit warning bell C. Other standards D. Parking layout and internal circulation Finding: No parking structure is proposed. Provisions 18.765.060 A-D do not apply. 411 Section 18.765.070 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements A. Parking requirements for unlisted uses. 1. The Director may rule that a use, not specifically listed in Section 18.765.070.H, is a use similar to a listed use and that the same parking standards shall apply. If the applicant requests that the Director's decision be rendered in writing, it shall constitute a Director's Interpretation, as governed by Section 18.340. Finding: Minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements for Community Recreation are identified in Table 18.765.2. However, Chapter 18.330.050.B(5)directs that there are no off- street parking requirements for Community Recreation, except for dog parks. The proposed project is not, and does not contain, a dog park. This provision and the remaining provisions (B- I) of this subsection do not apply. 2. The Director shall maintain a list of approved unlisted use parking requirements which shall have the same effect as an amendment to this chapter. Finding: Advisory. This provision does not apply. Section 18.765.080 Off-Street Loading Requirements A. Off-street loading spaces. Commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures to be built or altered which receive and distribute material or merchandise by truck shall provide and maintain off-street loading and maneuvering space as follows: B. Off-street loading dimensions. Finding: The proposed project is a civic use and does not include the construction of any commercial, industrial and institutional buildings or structures. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-21 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 i Sensitive Lands (Chapter 18.775) Section 18.775.020 Applicability of Uses: Permitted,Prohibited,and Nonconforming A. CWS Stormwater Connection Permit. All proposed "development", must obtain a Stormwater Connection Permit from CWS pursuant to its "Design and Construction Standards". As used in this chapter, the meaning of the word "development"shall be as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards":All human-induced changes to improved or unimproved real property including: 1. Construction of structures requiring a building permit, if such structures are external to existing structures; 2. Land division; 3. Drilling; 4. Site alterations resulting from surface mining or dredging; 5. Grading; 6. Construction of earthen berms; 7. Paving; 8. Excavation; or 9. Clearing when it results in the removal of trees or vegetation which would require a permit from the local jurisdiction or an Oregon Department of Forestry tree removal permit. Finding: The proposed project proposes.the construction of a paved trail and bridge over Krueger Creek, and these site improvements will cross sensitive lands on site related to natural drainageways and segments of steep slopes. A CWS Stormwater Connection Permit will be • obtained for this project. All construction, grading, excavation and paving activities will be done in conformance with CWS Standards. This provision will be met. B. Outright permitted uses with no permit required. Except as provided below and by Sections 18.775.020.D, 18.775.020.F, and 18.775.020.G, the following uses are outright permitted uses within the 100-year floodplain, drainageways, slopes that are 25%or greater, and unstable ground when the use does not involve paving. For the purposes of this chapter, the word "structure"shall exclude: children's play equipment,picnic tables, sand boxes, grills, basketball hoops and similar recreational equipment. 3. Community recreation uses, excluding structures; except in (a) a Water Quality Sensitive Area or Vegetated Corridor, as defined in the CWS "Design and Construction Standards", or(b) the Statewide Goal 5 vegetated corridor established for the Tualatin River, as defined in Section 18.775.090. 5. Removal of poison oak, tansy ragwort, blackberry, English ivy, or other noxious vegetation. Finding: Although the park development project will entail the installation of recreational equipment and the removal of noxious vegetation, the development will construct paved trails and a structure requiring a building permit. These provisions regarding outright permitted uses do not apply, and the project will be regulated by the appropriate sections of this Chapter. C. Exemptions. When performed under the direction of the City, and in compliance with the provisions of the City of Tigard Standards and Specifications for Riparian Area Management, on file in the Engineering Division, the following shall be exempt from the provisions of this section: • Section 4 4-22 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • 1. Responses to public emergencies, including emergency repairs to public facilities; 2. Stream and wetlands restoration and enhancement programs; 3. Non-native vegetation removal 4. Planting of native plant species; and 5. Routine maintenance or replacement of existing public facilities projects. Finding: This project will be performed by the City of Tigard (applicant)and includes the implementation of elements of the City's Healthy Streams Program. Specifically,the project removes an undersized culvert from Kruger Creek, removes non-native vegetation, and installs native riparian plants significantly improving the health and function of the vegetated corridor and stream. This project is consistent with the City's ongoing culvert replacement program and will be in compliance with the Standards and Specifications for Riparian Area Management. The City has a strong record and long history in projects similar to the proposed project. The City removed a creek culvert and replaced it with a bridge and boardwalk at Englewood Park, which is comparable to the proposed project. Additionally, the City has over 170 acres of vegetated corridor enhancement projects underway, and the proposed improvements to the Krueger Creek vegetated corridor support and are part of the program goals of the enhancement program.As noted below,the proposed project is also consistent with the intent for planned culvert removals as part of the CWS Healthy Streams Plan. City stream restoration projects are exempt from the provisions of this Chapter. Responses to subsequent sections have been provided to add information and clarity about the project's intent, scope and impacts. As shown on the Existing Conditions Plan(Sheet L0.2), two failed pipe culvert exist on site in • the area of Krueger Creek, at the southern foot of trees#25 and#26. The first is a 9 foot long, 24 inch corrugated metal pipe that is embedded within and lodged into the stream bank above the water line. This pipe is located tangential to the creek corridor and serves no functional purpose. It is buried under approximately 18"of soil and entwined in the roots of native trees (#25 & #26). This pipe is not impairing stream flow and will be left in place to avoid disturbing the existing native trees which are providing valuable shade for the stream. The second culvert is a 7 foot long steel pipe that is located directly in the stream channel. This pipe is also non-functional, as creek water passes around both sides of the pipe,through the pipe, and possible under the pipe. This pipe is undersized for significant floods, alters the geomorphic condition of the stream and impairs fish passage. The pipe should be considered as debris rather than water management infrastructure. The project intent is to remove the pipe culvert located within the creek way and replace it with a bridge that spans the stream channel and its associated buffer. This will eliminate pedestrian foot traffic at the creek edge and relocate traffic over the full extent of the creek and its associated wetlands. This new bridge will span the stream channel resulting in unimpaired fish passage and eliminating the rogue, demand trails that currently cross the creek. By opening up both the stream channel and it's adjacent buffer the bridge will provide more than adequate conveyance for flood flows. These conditions are expected to decrease erosion of the stream channel and significantly improve water quality. The pipe culvert removal is consistent with the CWS Healthy Streams Plan and is a noted culvert on Map 1-5 of the Healthy Streams Plan as a priority level #6 culvert(on a 10-point scale,where 10 is highest priority). Along with the removal of the • steel pipe,the project proposes the removal of invasive species (i.e.,blackberries)and replanting Section 4 4-23 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 the vegetated corridor consistent with CWS requirements. The removal of this culvert is part of a • larger programmatic process to replace or remove culverts as part of the existing culvert replacement program. We might mention that the bridge and trail will also The planned removal and retrofitting of the failed pipe culvert with a bridge is also exempt from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands permits. The pipe and subsequent replacement bridge is not located within the wetlands, and the volume of soil disturbance,approximately 1 cubic yard, is far below the minimum thresholds for permitting,which are 10 cubic yards of removal (Corps) and 50 cubic yards of removal (DSL). Construction methodology used to remove the culvert and set the new bridge will be completed with a large crane. The crane will be able to lift the existing culvert out of the area with minimal mechanical disturbance to the bank or creek way. D. Jurisdictional wetlands. Landform alterations or developments which are only within wetland areas that meet the jurisdictional requirements and permit criteria of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Division of State Lands, CWS, and/or other federal, state, or regional agencies, and are not designated as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map", do not require a sensitive lands permit. The City shall require that all necessary permits from other agencies are obtained. All other applicable City requirements must be satisfied, including sensitive land permits for areas within the 100-year floodplain, slopes of 25%or greater or unstable ground, drainageways, and wetlands which are not under state or federal jurisdiction. Finding: The proposed project does not include any landform alterations or development within • wetland areas on site. This provision does not apply. F. Sensitive lands permits issued by the Director. 1. The Director shall have the authority to issue a sensitive lands permit in the following areas by means of a Type II procedure, as governed in Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria contained in Section 18.775.070: a. Drainageways; b. Slopes that are 25%or greater or unstable ground; and c. Wetland areas which are not regulated by other local, state, or federal agencies and are designated as significant wetlands on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map. " Finding: The proposed project includes the development of a trail and bridge crossing of Krueger Creek that will cross sensitive lands on site related to natural drainageways and segments of steep slopes. The proposed site improvements have been determined to require a Type-II review in the pre-application meeting. A Sensitive Lands Review application is included with this land use application. 2. Sensitive lands permits shall be required for the areas in Section 18.775.020.F.I above when any of the following circumstances apply: a. Ground disturbance(s) or land form alterations involving more than 50 cubic yards of material; • Section 4 4-24 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • b. Repair, reconstruction, or improvement of an existing structure or utility, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50%of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction; c. Residential and nonresidential structures intended for human habitation; and d. Accessory structures which are greater than 528 square feet in size, outside floodway areas. Finding: The proposed development creates ground disturbances of more than 50 cubic yards of material for the installation of the trail and bridge abutments. A Sensitive Lands Review application is included with this land use application. 18.775.030 Administrative Provisions A. Interagency coordination. The appropriate approval authority shall review all sensitive lands permit applications to determine that all necessary permits shall be obtained from those federal, state, or local governmental agencies from which prior approval is also required. 1. As governed by CWS "Design and Construction Standards, "the necessary permits for all "development,"as defined in Section 18.775.020.A above, shall include a CWS Service Provider Letter, which specifies the conditions and requirements necessary, if any,for an applicant to comply with CWS water quality protection standards and for the Agency to issue a Stormwater Connection Permit. Finding: The applicant has provided the Service Provider Letter from CWS with this application, which specifies the necessary conditions and requirements. This provision is met. • B. Alteration or relocation of water course. 1. The Director shall notify communities adjacent to the affected area and the State Department of Land Conservation and Development prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Insurance Administration; 2. The Director shall require that maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated portion of a watercourse so that the flood-carrying capacity is not diminished. Finding: The project does not require the alteration of any watercourse. This provision does not apply. C. Apply standards. The appropriate approval authority shall apply the standards set forth in Sections 18.775.040, and 18.775.070 when reviewing an application for a sensitive lands permit. Finding: Advisory. D. Elevation and flood-proofing certification. The appropriate approval authority shall require that the elevations and flood proofing certification required in Section 18.775.030.E below be provided prior to permit issuance and verification upon occupancy and final approval. Finding: Advisory. E. Maintenance of records. 1. Where base flood elevation data is provided through the Flood Insurance Study, the Building Official shall obtain and record the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor(including basement) of all new or substantially improved structures, and • whether or not the structure contains a basement; Section 4 4-25 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 2. For all new or substantially improved flood-proofed structures, the Building Official shall: • a. Verify and record the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level); and b. Maintain the food proofing certifications required in this chapter. 3. The Director shall maintain for public inspection all other records pertaining to the provisions in this chapter. Finding: These provisions apply to habitable structures. The proposed project includes the construction of bridge abutments to support a wood truss bridge to cross Krueger Creek. This provision does not apply. 18.775.040 General Provisions for Floodplain Areas (A-0) Finding: The proposed project does not impact or encroach within a 100-year floodplain or conflict with a 1996 flood inundation line. The provisions of this section do not apply. 18.775.050 General Provisions for Wetlands A. Code compliance requirements. Wetland regulations apply to those areas classified as significant on the City of Tigard "Wetland and Streams Corridors Map, "and to a vegetated corridor ranging from 25 to 200 feet wide, measured horizontally,from the defined boundaries of the wetland,per "Table 3.1, Vegetated Corridor Widths, "and "Appendix C, Natural Resource Assessments,"of the CWS "Design and Construction Standards." Wetland locations may include but are not limited to those areas identified as wetlands in "Wetland Inventory and Assessment for the City of Tigard, Oregon, "Fishman Environmental Services, 1994. Finding: Advisory. The project site includes a locally significant wetland and a vegetated corridor associated with Krueger Creek, as shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheets L0.1 • to L0.3). The proposed development does not impact or alter wetlands on site. Work is not proposed within the wetlands, but will occur within the vegetated corridors. As described in the Natural Resource Assessment(Appendix F), the vegetated corridor width for the project is defined as 50 feet from the creek. Limited impacts to the vegetated corridor are proposed, and mitigation and enhancements are planned in accordance with the requirements outlined in the CWS Service Provider Letter. The extents of the vegetated corridor, as determined by CWS, are shown in the applicant's plans. B. Delineation of wetland boundaries. Precise boundaries may vary from those shown on wetland maps; specific delineation of wetland boundaries may be necessary. Wetland delineation will be done by qualified professionals at the applicant's expense. Finding: The Existing Conditions Plan(Sheets L0.1 to L0.3) included with this application indicate the extent of mapped wetlands and the vegetated corridor located on the project site, as prepared by Pacific Habitat Services and PBS Environmental to meet CWS requirements. This provision is met. 18.775.070 Sensitive Land Permits A. Permits required. An applicant, who wishes to develop within a sensitive area, as defined in Chapter 18.775, must obtain a permit in certain situations. Depending on the nature and intensity of the proposed activity within a sensitive area, either a Type II or Type III permit is required, as delineated in Sections 18.775.020.F and 18.775.020.G. The approval criteria for various kinds of sensitive areas, e.g.,floodplain, are presented in Sections 18.775.070.B- 18.775.070.E below. • Section 4 4-26 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Finding: Advisory. The proposed site improvements have been determined to require a Type-II review in the pre-application meeting. A Sensitive Lands Review application is included with this land use application. This provision will be met. B. Within the 100-year floodplain. The Hearings Officer shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request within the 100-year floodplain based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: (#1 - #7) Finding: The proposed project does not impact or encroach within a 100-year floodplain or conflict with a 1996 flood inundation line. The provisions of this section do not apply. C. With steep slopes. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit on slopes of 25%or greater or unstable ground based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; Finding: The project area that is impacted by steep slopes is limited to a narrow band of side slope existing to the northwest of Station 50 in the transition between the upland shelf and Krueger Creek. A six foot wide asphalt trail with one foot gravel shoulders is proposed for pedestrian and bicycle users. An asphalt surface will allow complete ADA accessibility, year-round use, durability and future ease of maintenance. The proposed width of the trail is the minimum necessary to serve the intended use. The proposed trail alignment crosses the area of steep slopes by design necessity. A very small area of slope greater than 25%will be • disturbed. The total length of the proposed trail is 725 feet, and total length of trail passing through steep slopes is 125 feet(16 %of total trail). As designed,the public use trail must meet the requirements of ADA, which include a maximum longitudinal slope of 5%and a maximum cross slope of 2%. The side hill northwest of Station 50 is the only feasible route to align the public trail due to the optimal location of the bridge span to avoid wetland impacts and to simultaneously satisfy ADA requirements of a 5%trail slope. Additionally, a geotechnical report was prepared by Geotechnics LLC and is included with this application as Appendix G. The report concluded that the slopes in the vicinity of the proposed bridge foundation are stable for both static and seismic conditions and will have no adverse impact on slope stability. The extent of the proposed trail will not create disturbances to an extent greater than that required to meet ADA guidelines. This provision will be met. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; Finding: This provision will be met. The Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheets L5.1 & L5.2) and subsequent constructions plans and specifications identify measures, such as silt fencing and jute netting,to minimize soil movement and prevent erosion and stream sedimentation. 3. The structures are appropriately sited and designed to ensure structural stability and proper drainage of foundation and crawl space areas for development with any of the following soil conditions: wet/high water table; high shrink-swell capability; • compressible/organic; and shallow depth-to-bedrock; and Section 4 4-27 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Finding: No structures are proposed within areas of steep slopes. The bridge and the bridge • abutments are located on more gradual slopes. The proposed trail segments that cross limited areas of steep slopes are designed to ensure proper drainage. This provision does not apply. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening Finding: This application will not have negative impacts to native vegetation. Only one tree, a non-native, exotic sycamore maple (#4), exists on site that is within an area of steep slope and will be removed due to its poor condition and conflict with the proposed trail location. Along Krueger Creek in the area of the proposed bridge, eleven alder trees (#27 -#30, #32 & #37 -#42), one non-native common hawthorn (#53) and one cottonwood(#43) are identified for removal. These trees are not within steep slope areas. Five of the alders are dead, and the remaining trees of the group conflict with the location of the proposed bridge. New plantings are proposed within the corridor, and this project has been conditioned by the applicant's CWS Service Provider Letter to enhance the corridor to meet or exceed good condition, consistent with this standard. This provision will be met. D. Within drainageways. The appropriate approval authority shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within drainageways based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; • Finding: This application proposes limited impacts within the drainageway of Krueger Creek resulting from the development of the public use trail and bridge. The primary impact will be from the excavation for and construction of the abutments supporting the bridge span. A geotechnical report was prepared by Geotechnics LLC and is included with this application as Appendix G. The report concluded that the slopes in the vicinity of the proposed foundation are stable for both static and seismic conditions and will have no adverse impact on slope stability. The extent of the proposed trail will not create disturbances to an extent greater than that required to meet ADA guidelines. Additionally,the areas of the drainageway and vegetated corridor that are disturbed to construct the trail and bridge will be restored and enhanced as per conditioned by the CWS Service Provider Letter This provision will be met. 2. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; Finding: The proposed development of the trail and bridge and site disturbances within the vegetated corridor will be minimized and protected with erosion control measures. The erosion control measures required by CWS,along with the construction plans and specifications,will ensure the proposed development within the drainageway will not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, consistent with these standards. This provision will be met. 3. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; • Section 4 4-28 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Finding: This application will not affect the water flow capacity of the Krueger Creek drainageway, and the proposed bridge is designed to an elevation to provide at least 6" of clear freeboard above modeled peak stage flows.A hydraulic analysis was completed by Salmon River Engineering PLLC for the project to determine if there are any restrictions to the proposed bridge low chord from potential flood levels on Krueger Creek. The low chord is defined as the bottom of a bridge deck or the underlying support structure that first contacts rising water during a flood. According to Greg Berry with the City of Tigard Engineering Department,there are no specific design standards relevant to the creek crossing within the park. Mr. Berry suggested the proposed bridge should be designed to provide 6 inches of freeboard above the stage predicted for a peak discharge of 68 cubic feet per second which corresponds to a recurrence interval of 10-years and land use based upon the Metro 2040 Plan. Flood stage was estimated for the proposed bridge location using the Manning Equation, and the analysis resulted in a recommended minimum elevation for the bridge low chord as 212.6 feet or higher. As designed,the low chord of the bridge will be set at an elevation of approximately 217 feet, well above the estimated 10-year flood level occurrence of 212.6 feet in elevation, to minimize potential for trapping floating debris under or against the proposed bridge during a larger flood and to better facilitate wildlife passage under the bridge structure. This provision will be met. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; • Finding: As previously noted,this application will not have any negative impacts to native vegetation. The areas of the drainageway and vegetated corridor that are disturbed to construct the trail and bridge will be restored and enhanced as per conditioned by the CWS Service Provider Letter, and as described in the responses to Chapter 18.775,the provisions regarding landscaping and screen have been met. This provision will be met. 5. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in accordance with the adopted 1981 Master Drainage Plan; Finding: The drainageway is not being replaced, and the flow capacity of the corridor will not be impacted. Therefore,this provision does not apply. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and CWS approvals shall be obtained; Finding: The applicant does not propose any landform alterations or development within wetlands on site;therefore U.S. ACOE and Oregon DSL permits are not required. The planned removal of the non-functional pipe culvert is also exempt from U.S. ACOE and Oregon DSL permits, since the projected disturbance (approximately 1 cubic yard) is below the permit thresholds of 10 cubic yards of removal (Corps) and 50 cubic yards of removal (DSL). The CWS Service Provider Letter is included within this application, which outlines additional conditions for the proposed project. All conditions posed by CWS will be met. This provision will be met. 7. Where land form alterations and/or development are allowed within and adjacent to the • 100-year floodplain, the City shall require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open Section 4 4.29 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 land area within and adjacent to the floodplain in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. • This area shall include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway within the floodplain in accordance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. Finding: This project does not proposed land form alterations or development within or adjacent to a 100-year floodplain; however, since the proposed improvements are within a park and open space area, sufficient land is available for floodplain functions. The project entails the development of a trail suitable for pedestrian and bicycle use across the vegetated corridor and lowlands associated with Krueger Creek, consistent with the intent of the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. This provision will be met. E. Within wetlands. The Director shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application request for a sensitive lands permit within wetlands based upon findings that all of the following criteria have been satisfied: 1. The proposed land form alteration or development is neither on wetland in an area designated as significant wetland on the Comprehensive Plan Floodplain and Wetland Map nor is within the vegetative corridor established per "Table 3.1 Vegetative Corridor Widths" and "Appendix C:Natural Resources Assessments"of the CWS "Design and Construction Standards,"for such a wetland; Finding: This project does not proposed land form alterations or development within the delineated wetlands on site. The bridge and trail cross through the vegetated corridor associated with Krueger Creek, and impacts to these sensitive lands have been addressed under the subsections of this Chapter pertaining to drainageways and steep slopes. • Additionally, eleven trees identified for removal in the area of the proposed bridge are located within wetland "b". To remove these trees, the applicant will eliminate any potential soil disturbance within the wetland area by proposing to cut these trees at their base flush with grade and not removing the root systems. 2. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than the minimum required for the use; Finding: This project does not proposed land form alterations or development within the delineated wetlands on site. Site disturbances within the vegetated corridor related to the trail and bridge will be minimized and protected with erosion control measures. This provision will be met. 3. Any encroachment or change in on-site or off-site drainage which would adversely impact wetland characteristics have been mitigated; Finding: No impacts to delineated wetlands are proposed with this project. The areas of the vegetated corridor that are disturbed to construct the trail and bridge will be restored and enhanced as per conditioned by the CWS Service Provider Letter. This provision will be met. 4. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development, erosion control provisions of the Surface Water Management program of Washington County must be met and areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted in like or similar species in accordance with Chapter 18.745, Landscaping and Screening; • Section 4 4-30 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Finding: As previously noted,this application will not have any negative impacts to native vegetation. The areas of the vegetated corridor that are disturbed to construct the trail and bridge will be restored and enhanced as per conditioned by the CWS Service Provider Letter, and as described in the responses to Chapter 18.775,the provisions regarding landscaping and screen have been met. This provision will be met. 5. All other sensitive lands requirements of this chapter have been met; Finding: All other applicable sensitive land requirements of this Chapter have been met. This provision will be met. 6. The necessary U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board, Division of State Lands, and CWS approvals shall be obtained; Finding: The applicant does not propose any landform alterations or development within wetlands on site;therefore U.S.ACOE and Oregon DSL permits are not required. The CWS Service Provider Letter is included within this application, which outlines additional conditions for the proposed project. All conditions posed by CWS will be met. This provision will be met. 7. The provisions of Chapter 18.790, Tree Removal, shall be met; Finding: As detailed in this application narrative,the provisions of Chapter 18.790 have been addressed and met. This provision will be met. • 8. Physical Limitations and Natural Hazards, Floodplains and Wetlands, Natural Areas, and Parks, Recreation and Open Space policies of the Comprehensive Plan have been satisfied. (Ord. 09-11) Finding: The applicant has reviewed the policies of the Tigard Comprehensive Plan hat relate to wetlands and believes those policies have been satisfied. Plan sections reviewed include Water Resources Quality(Goal 6), Hazards(Goal 7), and Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space (Goal 8). The proposed trail and bridge design meets regional, state and federal water quality standards by meeting CWS permit requirements. The construction of the proposed trail segment furthers the policy of creating an interconnected regional system of trails. The applicant has proposed a design that tries to balance the policies of providing community trails and while minimizing the impact on natural areas. This provision is met. 18.775.090 Special Provisions for Development within Locally Significant Wetlands and along the Tualatin River,Fanno Creek,Ball Creek, and the South Fork of Ash Creek(A-B) Finding: The proposed project is not located along the Tualatin River, Fanno Creek, Ball Creek, or the South Fork of Ash Creek. The provisions of this section do not apply. 18.775.100 Adjustments to Underlying Zone Standards (A-C) Adjustments to dimensional standards of the underlying zone district may be approved by the Planning Director when necessary to further the purpose of this section. Finding: The applicant does not request adjustments to zone standards. The provisions of this section do not apply. • 18.775.110 Density Transfer Section 4 4-31 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Density may be transferred from vegetated corridor areas as provided in Sections 18.715.020— • 18.715.030. Finding: The applicant does not request a density transfer, since the proposed project is for a civic use, not residential. The provisions of this section do not apply. 18.775.120 Variances to Section 18.775.090 Standards (A-B) Variances to the use provisions of Section 18.775.090 are not permitted. Variances from measurable (dimensional)provisions of this section shall be discouraged and may be considered only as a last resort. Finding: The applicant does not request a variance. The provisions of this section do not apply. 18.775.140 Significant Habitat Areas Map Verification Procedures The Significant Habitat Areas Map shall be the basis for determining the general location of significant habitat areas on or adjacent to the site. A. Applicants who concur that the Significant Habitat Areas Map is accurate shall submit the following information to serve as the basis for verifying the boundaries of inventoried habitat areas: 1. Submission requirements. a. A detailed property description; b. A scale map of the property showing the locations of Significant Habitat Areas, any existing built area, wetlands or water bodies, Clean Water Services'vegetated corridor, the 100-year floodplain, the 1996 flood inundation line, and contour lines (two foot intervals for slope less than 15%and 10-foot intervals for slopes 15%or greater); and • c. A current aerial photograph of the property. Finding: Included with this application, a property description, aerial map and scaled map showing sensitive lands [Existing Conditions Plan (Sheets L0.1 to L0.3)] are provided. The Existing Conditions Plan also shows the extent of delineated wetlands and delineated vegetated corridors for the site. This provision is met. 2. Decision process. The Planning Director's decision shall be based on consideration of submitted information, site visit information, and other factual information. Should the applicant disagree with the Planning Director's determination on the location of significant habitat areas on the property, the precise boundaries shall be verified by the applicant in accordance with the detailed delineation methodology outlined in Section 18.775.140.B. Finding: Advisory. Tree Removal (Chapter 18.790) 18.790.030 Tree Plan Requirement A. Tree plan required. A tree plan for the planting, removal and protection of trees prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision,partition, site development review,planned development or conditional use is filed. Protection is preferred over removal wherever possible. Finding: The required tree plan illustrating the removal and protection of trees has been submitted with this application as part of the Arborist Report (Appendix D),the Tree • Section 4 4-32 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Preservation/Mitigation Plan (Sheets L1.1 to L1.3) and the Landscaping Plan (Sheets L7.1 to L7.3). B. Plan requirements. The tree plan shall include the following: 1. Identification of the location, size and species of all existing trees including trees designated as significant by the city; Finding: The Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan (Sheets L1.1 to L1.3) identifies the location, size and species of all existing trees over 6" diameter on site. This requirement has been met. 2. Identification of a program to save existing trees or mitigate tree removal over 12 inches in caliper. Mitigation must follow the replacement guidelines of Section 18.790.060D, in accordance with the following standards and shall be exclusive of trees required by other development code provisions for landscaping, streets and parking lots: d. Retention of 75%or greater of existing trees over 12 inches in caliper requires no mitigation. Finding: As noted below, the Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan and the accompanying Arborist Report identify the retention of at least 80%of existing trees over 12" in caliper; therefore, no mitigation for the planned removals is required. 3. Identification of all trees which are proposed to be removed; Finding: As illustrated on the Tree Preservation/Mitigation Plan (Sheets L1.1 to L1.3),the • trees that are proposed for removal are clearly identified with an"X" in those locations. In total, seventeen trees have been identified for removal, and three of the trees are over 12" in caliper. As highlighted in the Arborist Report(Appendix D),three poor quality fruit trees (#1 — 14"Apple; #2—7" Plum&#3— 11"Apple)were identified for removal because they will create hazards for park users from falling fruit and conflict with the future location of playground equipment. One Sycamore Maple (#4)was identified for removal because it is in poor condition with significant limb cavities and conflicts with the location of the proposed trail. As noted in the response to Chapter 18.330,trees#1, #3 and#4 were formerly protected with deed restrictions at the time of the CUP approval for Station 50. At that time in 2006, one apple(#1)was noted as being in poor condition,and all three remained on site because they were over 6" caliper. These trees are now in poor condition. Additionally,the two apple trees (#1 & #3)offer little value as either shade trees or fruit producers, and the sycamore maple (#4) is considered an exotic invasive in much of the U.S. (see the following for more information: http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/forestry/invasivetutorial/sycamore_maple.htm). In the City's new tree code, these trees would not be considered important to save, especially given their poor condition. In the area of Krueger Creek, eleven Alder trees (#27 -#30, #32 &#37 -#42), one Common Hawthorn (#53)and one Cottonwood(#43)were identified for removal. Five of the Alders are dead, and the remaining trees of the group conflict with the location of the proposed bridge. 4. A protection program defining standards and methods that will be used by the applicant to • protect trees during and after construction. Section 4 4-33 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Finding: Trees to remain on site will be protected as illustrated on the Tree Preservation and • Mitigation Plan and described in the Arborist Report. C. Subsequent tree removal. Trees removed within the period of one year prior to a development application listed above will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060D. Finding: The applicant acknowledges this restriction; any trees removed within a one-year period to this development application will be inventoried and mitigated as part of the tree plan. 18.790.040 Incentives for Tree Retention A. Incentives. To assist in the preservation and retention of existing trees, the Director may apply one or more of the following incentives as part of development review approval and the provisions of a tree plan according to Section 18.790.030: 1. Density bonus. For each 2%of canopy cover provided by existing trees over 12 inches in caliper that are preserved and incorporated into a development plan, a 1%bonus may be applied to density computations of Chapter 18.715. No more than a 20%bonus may be granted for any one development. The percentage density bonus shall be applied to the number of dwelling units allowed in the underlying zone. This bonus is not applicable to trees preserved in areas of floodplain, slopes greater than 25%, drainageways, or wetlands that would otherwise be precluded from development; Finding: The proposed project is for a city park. This provision does not apply. 2. Lot size averaging. To retain existing trees over 12 inches in caliper in the development • plan for any land division under Chapter 18.400, lot size may be averaged to allow lots less than the minimum lot size allowed by the underlying zone as long as the average lot area for all lots and private open space is not less than that allowed by the underlying zone. No lot area shall be less than 80%of the minimum lot size allowed in the zone; Finding: The proposed project is for a city park. This provision does not apply. 3. Lot width and depth. To retain existing trees over 12 inches in caliper in the development plan for any land division under Chapter 18.400, lot width and lot depth may be reduced up to 20%of that required by the underlying zone; Finding: The proposed project is for a city park. This provision does not apply. 4. Commercial/industrial/civic use parking. For each 2%of canopy cover provided by existing trees over 12 inches in caliper that are preserved and incorporated into a development plan for commercial, industrial or civic uses listed in Section 18.765.080, Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements, a 1%reduction in the amount of required parking may be granted No more than a 20%reduction in the required amount of parking may be granted for any one development; Finding: The proposed project is for a city park, which does not have associated parking requirements. This provision does not apply. 5. Commercial/industrial/civic use landscaping. For each 2%of canopy cover provided by existing trees over 12 inches in caliper that are preserved and incorporated into a development plan, a 1%reduction in the required amount of landscaping may be granted. No • Section 4 4-34 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • more than 20%of the required amount of landscaping may be reduced for any one development. Finding: The proposed project is for a city park. The preservation and expansion of natural areas and public landscapes is a core component of park development.No reduction in required landscaping is requested. B. Subsequent removal of a tree. Any tree preserved or retained in accordance with this section may thereafter be removed only for the reasons set out in a tree plan, in accordance with Section 18.790.030, or as a condition of approval for a conditional use, and shall not be subject to removal under any other section of this chapter. The property owner shall record a deed restriction as a condition of approval of any development permit affected by this section to the effect that such tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. The deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if a tree preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as a hazardous tree. The form of this deed restriction shall be subject to approval by the Director. Finding: Should any subsequent trees need to be removed,the applicant will follow all applicable standards and requirements. 18.790.050 Permit Applicability A. Removal permit required. Tree removal permits shall be required only for the removal of any tree which is located on or in a sensitive land area as defined by Chapter 18.775. The permit for removal of a tree shall be processed as a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.030, • using the following approval criteria: Finding: Thirteen of the seventeen trees proposed for removal lie within a sensitive land as defined by Chapter 18.775.O10.G. The regulated trees include 11 alders, 1 cottonwood and 1 hawthorn. A tree removal permit for these trees is required, and an application for their removal has been included with this application. This provision will be met. 1. Removal of the tree must not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters or water quality as evidenced by an erosion control plan which precludes: a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 cubic foot in volume on public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the storm and surface water system, either by direct deposit, dropping, discharge or as a result of the action of erosion; Finding: In the areas of the proposed tee removals, silt fencing will be installed as shown on the Grading and Erosion Control Plan(Sheets L5.1 &L5.2).No deposits of mud, dirt or sediment are anticipated that will negatively impact public or private streets, adjacent property, or into the storm and surface water system. This provision will be met. b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils; turbid or sediment-laden flows; or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes where the flow of water is not filtered or captured on site using the techniques of Chapter 5 of the Washington County Unified Sewerage Agency Environmental Protection and Erosion Control rules. • Section 4 4-35 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Finding: The Grading and Erosion Control Plan (Sheets L5.1 & L5.2) shows erosion • control measures will be employed during the construction period. In addition, Clean Water Services permits regulate erosion control. The project includes replanting the vegetated corridor with trees and other vegetation pursuant to CWS's enhancement standards. The erosion control measures required by CWS, along with the construction plans and specifications,will ensure the proposed tree removal and excavation will not have a measurable negative impact on erosion, consistent with these standards. This provision will be met. 2. Within stream or wetland corridors, as defined as 50 feet from the boundary of the stream or wetland, tree removal must maintain no less than a 75%canopy cover or no less than the existing canopy cover if the existing canopy cover is less than 75%. Finding: The proposed tree removals are within the Krueger Creek corridor. As measured from 50 feet from the creek,the existing canopy coverage is approximately 83%across both City-owned tax lots (TL 04501 & 04600)within this corridor. The removal of the proposed trees will temporarily lower the canopy coverage to 77%. Additionally, new plantings are proposed within the corridor, and this project has been conditioned by the applicant's CWS Service Provider Letter to provide enhance the corridor to meet or exceed good condition as defined in R&O 07-20, Section 3.14.2, Table3-3, consistent with this standard. This provision will be met. 18.790.060 Illegal Tree Removal A. Violations... • B. Remedies... C. Fines... Finding: As noted above, over 75%of the trees over 12" in caliper are being retained on site; therefore, mitigation is not required. D. Guidelines for replacement... E. In lieu-of payment... Finding: As noted above, over 75%of the trees over 12" in caliper are being retained on site; therefore,no mitigation,replacement or in lieu-of payment is required. F. Exclusivity. The remedies set out in this section shall not be exclusive. Finding: The applicant acknowledges that the remedies set out in this section are not exclusive. Visual Clearance Area (Chapter 18.795) 18.795.030 Visual Clearance Requirements A. At corners. Except within the CBD zoning district a visual clearance area shall be maintained on the corners of all property adjacent to the intersection of two streets, a street and a railroad, or a driveway providing access to a public or private street. Finding: The site for the proposed park improvements are not adjacent to an intersection of two streets or a street and a railroad, and the proposed project does not include a driveway providing access to a public or private street. Therefore,these standards do not apply. • Section 4 4-36 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • B. Obstructions prohibited. A clear vision area shall contain no vehicle, hedge,planting,fence, wall structure or temporary or permanent obstruction (except for an occasional utility pole or tree), exceeding three feet in height, measured from the top of the curb, or where no curb exists, from the street center line grade, except that trees exceeding this height may be located in this area,provided all branches below eight feet are removed. Finding: The proposed project does not include a driveway or accessway to a street. This standard does not apply. C. Additional topographical constraints. Where the crest of a hill or vertical curve conditions contribute to the obstruction of clear vision areas at a street or driveway intersection, hedges, plantings,fences, walls, wall structures and temporary or permanent obstructions shall be further reduced in height or eliminated to comply with the intent of the required clear vision area. Finding: The proposed project does not include a driveway or accessway to a street. The site's access is not constrained by topographical features. This standard does not apply. 18.795.040 Computations A. Arterial streets. On all designated arterial streets the visual clearance area shall not be less than 35 feet on each side of the intersection. Finding: The proposed project does not abut an intersection or include a driveway or accessway to a street. This standard does not apply. • Street and Utility Improvement Standards (Chapter 18.810) 18.810.020 General Provisions A. When standards apply. Unless otherwise provided, construction, reconstruction or repair of streets, sidewalks, curbs and other public improvements shall occur in accordance with the standards of this title... Finding: As per the Pre-application Conference Notes, street improvements are not required for this project. The development of this site does not trigger the need for additional improvements to SW Walnut Street. D. Adjustments. Adjustments to the provisions in this chapter related to street improvements may be granted by means of a Type I procedure, as governed by Section 18.390.040, using approval criteria in Section 18.370.030.C.9. Finding: The applicant is not requesting any Special Adjustment for the proposed project. 18.810.030 Streets A. Improvements. 1. No development shall occur unless the development has frontage or approved access to a public street. Finding: The site fronts onto SW 127th Avenue and SW Walnut Street,which are public streets in compliance with this requirement. • Section 4 4-37 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 2. No development shall occur unless streets within the development meet the standards of • this chapter. Finding: Demonstration of compliance is provided below. 3. No development shall occur unless the streets adjacent to the development meet the standards of this chapter,provided, however, that a development may be approved if the adjacent street does not meet the standards but half-street improvements meeting the standards of this title are constructed adjacent to the development. Finding: SW Walnut Street has been previously improved to meet the standards of this chapter. There are no street improvements proposed or required with this project. This provision does not apply. 4 Any new street or additional street width planned as a portion of an existing street shall meet the standards of this chapter; Finding: There are no street improvements proposed with this project. This provision does not apply. S. If the City could and would otherwise require the applicant to provide street improvements, the City Engineer may accept a future improvements guarantee in lieu of street improvements if one or more of the following conditions exist: Finding: This provision is not required, as the applicant is not proposing any improvements that would trigger a need for street improvements. 6. The standards of this chapter include the standard specifications adopted by the City • Engineer pursuant to Section 18.810.020.B. Finding: This is advisory. 7. The approval authority may approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would result in an adverse impact on natural features such as wetlands, bodies of water, significant habitat areas, steep slopes, or existing mature trees. The approval authority may also approve adjustments to the standards of this chapter if compliance with the standards would have a substantial adverse impact on existing development or would preclude development on the property where the development is proposed. In approving an adjustment to the standards, the approval authority shall balance the benefit of the adjustment with the impact on the public interest represented by the standards. In evaluating the impact on the public interest, the approval authority shall consider the criteria listed in Section 18.810.030.E.1. An adjustment to the standards may not be granted if the adjustment would risk public safety. Finding: There are no street improvements proposed or required with this project. This provision does not apply. B. Creation of rights-of-way for streets and related purposes. Rights-of-way shall be created through the approval of a final subdivision plat or major partition; however, the Council may approve the creation of a street by acceptance of a deed,provided that such street is deemed essential by the Council for the purpose of general traffic circulation. • Section 4 4-38 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Finding: The proposed park project abuts existing public right-of-way, and neither a subdivision plat nor major partition are proposed for the subject property.No new rights-of-way are proposed with this application. This standard does not apply. C. Creation of access easements. The approval authority may approve an access easement established by deed without full compliance with this title... Finding: No new access easements are proposed. These standards do not apply. Sections D-I--related to development of new streets. Finding: No new streets are proposed with this application. These standards do not apply. J. Existing rights-of-way. Whenever existing rights-of-way adjacent to or within a tract are of less than standard width, additional rights-of-way shall be provided at the time of subdivision or development. Finding: The applicant has included an impact study (Section 3) as required and has demonstrated that there will be no increased impact upon the transportation, sewer, stormwater or water systems, and it will positively improve the City's level of service with regard to the provision of developed parkland. As per the Pre-application Conference Notes, no additional right-of-way dedications are required of this project. Additionally City of Tigard Engineering staff indicated that no TDT payment is required, and therefore,there is no mitigated or unmitigated impact on the street system. K. Partial street improvements. Partial street improvements resulting in a pavement width of less • than 20 feet; while generally not acceptable, may be approved where essential to reasonable development when in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations, and when it will be practical to require the improvement of the other half when the adjoining property developed. Finding: No partial street improvements are proposed. This provision does not apply. L. Culs-de-sacs. A cul-de-sac shall be no more than 200 feet long shall not provide access to greater than 20 dwelling units, and shall only be used when environmental or topographical constraints, existing development pattern, or strict adherence to other standards in this code preclude street extension and through circulation: Finding: No cul-de-sacs are proposed. This provision does not apply. M. Street names. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets in Washington County, except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the surrounding area and as approved by the City Engineer. Finding: No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. N. Grades and curves. Finding: No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-39 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 O. Curbs, curb cuts, ramps, and driveway approaches. Concrete curbs, curb cuts, wheelchair, • bicycle ramps and driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with standards specified in this chapter and Section 15.04.080... Finding: No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. P. Streets adjacent to railroad right-of-way. Wherever the proposed development contains or is adjacent to a railroad right-of-way,provision shall be made for a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land. Finding: The proposed project is not adjacent to a railroad right-of-way. This provision does not apply. Q. Access to arterials and collectors. Where a development abuts or is traversed by an existing or proposed arterial or collector street, the development design shall provide adequate protection for residential properties and shall separate residential access and through traffic, or if separation is not feasible, the design shall minimize the traffic conflicts. Finding: The proposed project is not a residential development. This provision does not apply. R. Alleys,public or private. Finding: No alleys are proposed. This provision does not apply. S. Survey monuments. Upon completion of a street improvement and prior to acceptance by the City, it shall be the responsibility of the developer's registered professional land surveyor to • provide certification to the City that all boundary and interior monuments shall be reestablished and protected. Finding: No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. T. Private streets. Finding: No private streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. U. Railroad crossings. Where an adjacent development results in a need to install or improve a railroad crossing, the cost for such improvements may be a condition of development approval, or another equitable means of cost distribution shall be determined by the public works Director and approved by the Commission. Finding: The proposed project is not adjacent to a railroad, and no railroad crossings are required. This provision does not apply. V. Street signs. The City shall install all street signs, relative to traffic control and street names, as specified by the City Engineer for any development. The cost of signs shall be the responsibility of the developer. Finding:No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. W. Mailboxes. Joint mailbox facilities shall be provided in all residential developments, with each joint mailbox serving at least two dwelling units. Finding: The proposed project is not a residential development. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-40 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • X. Traffic signals. The location of traffic signals shall be noted on approved street plans. Finding: No new streets or traffic signals are proposed. This provision does not apply. Y. Street light standards. Street lights shall be installed in accordance with regulations adopted by the City's direction. Finding: No new streets are proposed. This provision does not apply. Z. Street name signs. Street name signs shall be installed at all street intersections. Stop signs and other signs may be required Finding: No new streets are proposed. Street name signs exist at intersections adjacent to the subject property. This provision does not apply. AA. Street cross-sections. The final lift of asphalt concrete pavement shall be placed on all new constructed public roadways prior to final City acceptance of the roadway and within one year of the conditional acceptance of the roadway unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Finding:No newly constructed public roadways are proposed. This provision does not apply. AB. Traffic calming. When, in the opinion of the City Engineer, the proposed development will create a negative traffic condition on existing neighborhood streets, such as excessive speeding, the developer may be required to provide traffic calming measures. Finding: The proposed project is for the development of a neighborhood park.No new street development or parking are proposed. The proposed park development is not anticipated to • create negative traffic conditions on the existing streets. This provision does not apply. AC. Traffic study. Subsections 1 & 2... Finding: The proposed neighborhood park is expected to generate trips from the surrounding neighborhood, and the limited trail and bridge improvements are not anticipated to attract users from outside the immediate neighborhood. The ITE Trip Generation Manual has limited information given for parks, especially small neighborhood parks. This project is designed to encourage increased pedestrian activity. Based upon previous trip generation studies conducted within the greater Portland metro region, average peak hour trip end rates have been estimated at approximately 1.65 per acre of neighborhood parkland. The proposed development is a 7.03-acre neighborhood park, and the anticipated peak trips generated is less than twelve. 18.810.040 Blocks (A-B)--related to creation of new blocks Finding: These provisions do not apply, as the creation of new blocks is not part of this proposal. 18.810.050 Easements A. Easements. Easements for sewers, drainage, water mains, electric lines or other public utilities shall be either dedicated or provided for in the deed restrictions, and where a development traversed by a watercourse, or drainageway, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of the watercourse. Finding: No easements are required, since no new utilities are proposed with this application. This standard does not apply. • Section 4 4-41 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 B. Utility easements. A property owner proposing a development shall make arrangements with • the City, the applicable district and each utility franchise for the provision and dedication of utility easements necessary to provide full services to the development. The City's standard width for public main line utility easements shall be 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the utility company, applicable district, or City Engineer. Finding: All utilities necessary to service the site are available without the need to create new easements. Section 18.810.060 Lots(A-E) --related to the creation of new lots Finding: This application does not include any modifications to the existing lot or the creation of new lots. These standards do not apply. 18.810.070 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks. All industrial streets and private streets shall have sidewalks meeting City standards along at least one side of the street. All other streets shall have sidewalks meeting CO standards along both sides of the street. A development may be approved if an adjoining street has sidewalks on the side adjoining the development, even if no sidewalk exists on the other side of the street. Finding: A sidewalk exists along the site's frontage with SW Walnut Street in compliance with this provision. This provision is met. B. Requirement of developers. • 1. As part of any development proposal, or change in use resulting in an additional 1,000 vehicle trips or more per day, an applicant shall be required to ident direct, safe (1.25 x the straight line distance)pedestrian routes within 1/2 mile of their site to all transit facilities and Neighborhood Activity Centers (schools,parks, libraries, etc.). In addition, the developer may be required to participate in the removal of any gaps in the pedestrian system off-site if justified by the development. Finding: As discussed in this narrative,the proposed site improvements to add a trail and bridge is anticipated to have minimal additional traffic generation (and far below the 1,000 vehicle trip threshold). Additionally, adequate parking is provided on the adjacent parking lot at TVF&R Station 50. As no development is proposed other than minor site improvements, the proportionality to require frontage improvements with this approval is not met. This standard does not apply. 2. If there is an existing sidewalk, on the same side of the street as the development, within 300 feet of a development site in either direction, the sidewalk shall be extended from the site to meet the existing sidewalk, subject to rough proportionality(even if the sidewalk does not serve a neighborhood activity center). Finding: There are no sidewalk or street improvements proposed with this project. Additionally, a contiguous sidewalk along the entire block frontage exists on the same side of the street as the proposed project. This provision does not apply. C. Planter strip requirements. A planter strip separation of at least five feet between the curb and the sidewalk shall be required in the design of streets, except where the following conditions • Section 4 4-42 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • exist: there is inadequate right-of-way; the curbside sidewalks already exist on predominant portions of the street; it would conflict with the utilities, there are significant natural features (large trees, water features, significant habitat areas, etc) that would be destroyed if the sidewalk were located as required, or where there are existing structures in close proximity to the street(15 feet or less). Additional consideration for exempting the planter strip requirement may be given on a case-by-case basis if a property abuts more than one street frontage. Finding: A planter strip exists along the site's frontage with SW Walnut Street in compliance with this provision. This provision is met. D. Sidewalks in central business district. Finding: This project is not located within the central business district. This provision does not apply. E. Maintenance. Maintenance of sidewalks, curbs, and planter strips is the continuing obligation of the adjacent property owner. Finding: This is a standard provision that property owners are responsible for the maintenance of the public sidewalk along their respective street frontages. The applicant will comply by this requirement. F. Application for permit and inspection. If the construction of a sidewalk is not included in a performance bond of an approved subdivision or the performance bond has lapsed, then every person,firm or corporation desiring to construct sidewalks as provided by this chapter, shall, • before entering upon the work or improvement, apply for a street opening permit to the Engineering Department to so build or construct: 1. An occupancy permit shall not be issued for a development until the provisions of this section are satisfied. Finding: The applicant does not propose any street or sidewalk improvements. This provision does not apply. 2. The City Engineer may issue a permit and certificate allowing temporary noncompliance with the provisions of this section to the owner, builder or contractor... Finding: The applicant does not intend to request for delay of the construction of the public sidewalk. This provision does not apply. 3. The City Engineer shall inspect the construction of sidewalks for compliance with the provision set forth in the standard specifications manual. Finding: This provision is advisory. G. Council initiation of construction. In the event one or more of the following situations are found by the Council to exist, the Council may adopt a resolution to initiate construction of a sidewalk in accordance with City ordinances. Finding: None of these situations exist for the proposed project. This provision does not apply. • Section 4 4-43 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 18.810.080 Public Use Areas(A-B) --related to the dedication and acquisition of parkland • Finding: The proposed project is for a community recreation use on a city park property. This application does not include the development of a subdivision,a land division, or public use areas. These standards do not apply. 18.810.090 Sanitary Sewers A. Sewers required. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains in accordance with the provisions set forth in Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments) and the adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: Sanitary sewer exists within SW Walnut Street along the frontage, and no modifications regarding sanitary sewer service are proposed. This standard is met. B. Sewer plan approval. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to issuance of development permits involving sewer service. Finding: No new sewer lines are proposed. This provision does not apply. C. Over-sizing. Proposed sewer systems shall include consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: No new sewer lines are proposed with this application, and there is adequate sewer service to accommodate the site. This provision does not apply. D. Permits denied. Development permits may be restricted by the Commission or Hearings • Officer where a deficiency exists in the existing sewer system or portion thereof which cannot be rectified within the development and which if not rectified will result in a threat to public health or safety, surcharging of existing mains, or violations of state or federal standards pertaining to operation of the sewage treatment system. Finding: No new sewer lines are proposed with this application, and there is no known deficiency in the existing sewer system. This provision does not apply. 18.810.100 Storm Drainage A. General provisions. The Director and City Engineer shall issue a development permit only where adequate provisions for storm water and flood water runoff have been made, and: 1. The storm water drainage system shall be separate and independent of any sanitary sewerage system; 2. Where possible, inlets shall be provided so surface water is not carried across any intersection or allowed to flood any street; and 3. Surface water drainage patterns shall be shown on every development proposal plan. Finding: The majority of the site will remain as pervious landscaping, resulting in very little storm water from the proposed trail leaving the site. The limited impervious surfaces will flow to adjacent pervious surfaces to reduce runoff capacity. Water quality treatment of runoff generated by the trail improvements will be provided by sheet flow across vegetation within the vegetated corridor, similar to a filter strip. As the area of new impervious surface is relatively small, payment of fee-in-lieu will be considered for water quality treatment for these portions of the project. This provision has been met. • Section 4 4-44 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • B. Easements. Where a development is traversed by a watercourse, drainageway, channel or stream, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse and such further width as will be adequate for conveyance and maintenance. Finding: Krueger Creek bisects the city-owned subject property. The applicant may accept a condition of approval by the City Engineer to provide a stormwater easement or drainage right- of-way in the event an identified need can be provided for conveyance and maintenance. This provision will be met. C.Accommodation of upstream drainage. A culvert or other drainage facility shall be large enough to accommodate potential runoff from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside the development, and: 1. The City Engineer shall approve the necessary size of the facility, based on the provisions of Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management (as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Finding: There is no known upstream drainage that would impact this site. This provision does not apply. D. Effect on downstream drainage. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development will overload an existing drainage facility, the Director and Engineer shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been . made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with the Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments). Finding: There should be no additional runoff from the site. The minor trail and bridge improvements will produce very little additional drainage. This provisions of this section do not apply. 18.810.110 Bikeways and Pedestrian Pathways A. Bikeway extension. 1.As a standard, bike lanes shall be required along all arterial and collector routes and where identified on the City's adopted bicycle plan in the Transportation System Plan (TSP). Bike lane requirements along collectors within the Downtown Urban Renewal District shall be determined by the City Engineer. Finding: The adjacent frontage of Walnut Street is classified as an Arterial Street, and code- required bike lanes already exist. This application does not propose any street improvements. The provisions of this section(18.810.110.A -C) do not apply. 18.810.120 Utilities A. Underground utilities. All utility lines including, but not limited to those required for electric, communication, lighting and cable television services and related facilities shall be placed underground... • Section 4 4-45 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Finding: There are no new utilities proposed for this site, and utilities have been previously • undergrounded with past improvements to SW Walnut Street. This provision does not apply. B. Information on development plans. The applicant for a development shall show on the development plan or in the explanatory information, easements for all underground utility facilities... Finding: There are no new utilities proposed for this site. This provision does not apply. C. Exception to undergrounding requirement Finding: There are no new utilities proposed for this site. This provision does not apply. D. Fee in-lieu of undergrounding Finding: There will be no utility work done on this site. This provision does not apply. 18.810.130 Cash or Bond Required A. Guarantee. All improvements installed by the developer shall be guaranteed as to workmanship and material for a period of one year following acceptance by the City Council. B. Cash deposit or bond. Such guarantee shall be secured by cash deposit or bond in the amount of the value of the improvements as set by the City Engineer. C. Compliance requirements. The cash or bond shall comply with the terms and conditions of Section 18.430.090. Finding: No public improvements are proposed that warrant a cash or bond payment. These standards do not apply. • 18.810.140 Monuments A. Replacement required. Any monuments that are disturbed before all improvements are completed by the subdivider shall be replaced prior to final acceptance of the improvements. Finding: A land division is not proposed, however any monuments disturbed during the construction of the proposed site modifications will be replaced. This standard is met. 18.810.150 Installation Prerequisite A. Approval required. No public improvements, including sanitary sewers, storm sewers, streets, sidewalks, curbs, lighting or other requirements shall be undertaken except after the plans have been approved by the City,permit fee paid, and permit issued. Finding: The building permit process is the vehicle by which such permits are issued by the City Engineer. This requirement will be met. B. Permit fee. The permit fee is required to defray the cost and expenses incurred by the City for construction and other services in connection with the improvement. The permit fee shall be set by Council resolution Finding: The applicant will pay all applicable fees related to the submission of the building permit package in compliance with this requirement. 18.810.160 Installation Conformation A. Conformance required In addition to other requirements, improvements installed by the developer either as a requirement of these regulations or at his/her own option, shall conform to • Section 4 4-46 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • the requirements of this chapter and to improvement standards and specifications followed by the City. Finding: Compliance to this requirement will be demonstrated in the final inspection prior to the issuing of the occupancy permit. This requirement will be met. B. Adopted installation standards. The Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Oregon Chapter A.P.W A., and Design and Construction Standards for Sanitary and Surface Water Management(as adopted by the Unified Sewerage Agency in 1996 and including any future revisions or amendments)shall be a part of the City's adopted installation standard(s); other standards may also be required upon recommendation of the City Engineer. Finding: The applicant's civil engineer has designed all improvements to meet the city's standards, per this requirement. 18.810.170 Plan Check A. Submittal requirements. Work shall not begin until construction plans and construction estimates have been submitted and checked for adequacy and approved by the City Engineer in writing. The developer can obtain detailed information about submittal requirements from the City Engineer. Finding: The building permit submission is the vehicle by which the City Engineer approves all proposed improvements. B. Compliance. All such plans shall be prepared in accordance with requirements of the City. • Finding: This is advisory. 18.810.180 Notice to City A. Commencement. Work shall not begin until the City has been notified in advance. Finding: This is advisory. B. Resumption. If work is discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until the City is notified. Finding: This is advisory. 18.810.190 City Inspection A. Inspection of improvements. Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City. The City may require changes in typical sections and details if unusual conditions arising during construction warrant such changes in the public interest. Finding: This is advisory. 18.810.200 Engineer's Certification A. Written certification required. The developer's engineer shall provide written certification of a form provided by the City that all improvements, workmanship and materials are in accord with current and standard engineering and construction practices, and are of high grade,prior to City acceptance of the subdivision's improvements or any portion thereof for operation and maintenance. Finding: This is advisory. • Section 4 4-47 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Appendix B . Neighborhood Meeting Notes NOTE: The requisite neighborhood meeting was duly noticed with a mailer to all property owners within 500' of the site with labels provided by the City. The Affidavit of Mailing/Posting was signed by Steve Martin to acknowledge the mailing of meeting notices and for the posting of signage on site. The Affidavit was notarized at the City Planning Counter by Shirley Treat in March 28, 2012 and was retained by Ms. Treat. Efforts to retrieve a copy of this Affidavit were made, but the original, signed Affidavit is missing and unavailable for inclusion in this land use application packet. • • Appendix B B-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 • 114 _: MEETING NOTES TIGA.RD PROJECT NUMBER: #92022 ISSUE DATE: April 17,2012 PROJECT NAME: Jack Park Addition RECORDED BY: Steve Duh TO: FILE PRESENT: Steve Martin—City of Tigard Steve Duh—Conservation Technix Laura Herbon—Laura Herbon Landscape Architect LLC SUBJECT: Public Meeting Notes (04/12/12) INFORMATION ITEMS 1. Steve Duh opened the meeting,welcomed the attendees and read the city-required Statement of Purpose to acknowledge this meeting as the public meeting related to a pending land use application. 2. Steve Martin offered a summary of purpose for the master planning process and recognized the passage of the 2010 Parks Bond,which is funding the design and development of the Jack Park project. • 3. Laura Herbon reviewed the site's conditions, environmental constraints and the proposed park development program 4. Program elements include but are not limited to: a. Community gardens along Walnut Street b. Playground/Tot Lot—targeted towards younger children c. Nature Play Area—located near existing playground in Jack Park on north side of creek d. Trail&Bridge—connection to the developed portion of Jack Park;intended to fully span known wetlands near Krueger Creek e. Restoration Plantings—along Krueger Creek to mitigate for impacts of trail and bridge f. Pedestrian / ADA Access —removal of 1 parking stall to provide crosswalk to TVF&R meeting room g. Park Furnishings—such as benches,seat walls,bike racks 5. The upland portion of the Jack Park addition includes approximately one-quarter acre of developable land. 6. Updated information will be posted to the city's website as the project progresses. • Public Meeting Notes(04/12/12) Jack Park Addition Project Number#92022 • Page 2 PARTICIPANT COMMENTS/QUESTIONS Responses are italicized. 1. What playground types are liked/used at other city parks? The city provides playgrounds fora wide age group.In tot lot locations, close access to parking is beneficial, and that is the proposal for this park. 2. Comments regarding the playground: consider the playground for a wider age group than just toddlers; provide at least one swing;there may be a concern for kids(ages 5-8)being out of site if they are across the creek at the existing playground; the area within the park addition might not be large enough to accommodate all age groups;consider a single-structure playground for wider age group and fill the space; consider moving the proposed tot lot to the existing portion of Jack Park and install swings instead—do not use bright colors (e.g.,red) for the play structure and plant trees to block views from across Walnut. 3. What type of bridge will be installed? The bridge type has not yet been determined It may be wood or metal truss. 4. Will the bridge be usable for bicycles? Yes, the bridge will be wide enough to accommodate bicycles and strollers. 5. What type of fencing will be used at the gardens? The city typically uses 5'or 6'black vinyl chain link. 6. Comment keep and re-use the existing split rail fence on site 7. Is this the best location for a community garden?What is the demand?What are other locations?Will it create an operational challenge? The city operates I other garden space,and there is demand and interest for more.Other • potential locations include Summer Lake and the Summer Creek property near Fowler. The gardens operate with significant involvement from the gardeners,who aid in maintaining and caring for the site. 8. Have there been past security issues with the other community garden? No. 9. Will a composting bin be available at the garden? One had not been previousy planned, but it will be considered. 10. Have you considered a rainwater collection system from Station 50 for the water needs of the community garden? No,that option had not been previously considered 11. Will there be lighting in the park? Ong along the trail. Lighting may attract unwanted users at night if too bright. Planned lighting would be solar powervd pathwcg lighting. 12. Will a restroom be provided?Will one be considered in the future?Will access be granted to the TVF&R restroom?No access to the TVF&R station restroom will be accommodated No restroom is planned forthis park addition. 13. Is there park patrolling?What will be done to provide security and lighting at the park? Low level lighting is proposed along the trail to facilitate patrolling by Police officers. The city has used movable,motion detection cameras at other parks to counter vandalism issues.Park closure and rule signs will be posted at each entrance. At the close of the meeting,there was general consensus from participants for the proposed park layout to include the tot lot,community gardens,trail and bridge. Every effort has been made to accurately record this meeting. If any errors or omissions are noted,please provide written response within five days of receipt cc: Present • • • • VIIII = q Jack Park: Neighborhood Meeting April 12, 2012 SIGN-IN SHEET NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS 1" ,rv ( C, Sn_ ` � 5 bc � � '� 5 Ls) 1'k 1 v\a . c _CGc1A ) 2.6Z..5 5w tZ�i 0 ,DQ.__ bai-M Lew n br,�.�.� �‹,p 4xe, c CYAO.11 , cL�m ► 2 52 Cw w c� L� pc-, L3 f3 2 5- 90 s: (4. �/''�i4,i/7l✓/ .>7/ -reol /IE.fl-Q-,:, -b., Yi Ems''me e.ir>cic'Sir fc1,caM 1lidz30 SC..J I134 Pi1-1,tod a, / i��0 5��Ls :e..S..ti._,,..Sv W. i i a.1�'� 9 7 11 -'‘1ay - Gres 1,ti0ro.s-rnn -i (Dt0,N, 6i Ast oe, « T4, --Sw seclia fl‘ . ! ; 5 4 6—A R V `J L Is_1 C K G'L 6.-- - .f 6-L I -'6'r-,14l, . C.411 /2 sfc 5- 5 -3 .J /4.% o-J P‹. r2CL) ��°LC CW/1 fillo tc�I�� C21;&1�Ie1 0/ / S 5Liz4A/Air-4vbelL 51.11iiri(.11i7koi)-1eI/om Of-enL i k Co4.16, bNe-c4e2Ue. Cow,c.et.pec Qa c>67,-- 230399 1 f i `t7Z t—c39 g • II City of Tigard Public Works Department T 1 G A RD Parks Division Notice of Neighborhood Meeting March 26, 2012 RE: An Invitation to Help Design the Addition to Jack Park When: Thursday,April 12,2012 — 7 to 8:30 p.m. Where: TVF&R Station 50 —Community Room 12617 SW Walnut Street In 2006,Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (I'VF&R) purchased property at 12617 SW Walnut Street. A new fire station was constructed on a portion of the site, and the remaining 1.5- acre parcel,which is adjacent to Jack Park,was sold to the city. This property is slated for • modest development as an addition to Jack Park. An initial neighborhood meeting was held on February 22 to discuss the site master planning process for this addition to Jack Park. Project staff and the landscape architect presented potential development concepts for the park and listened to community input. Meeting minutes and park design concepts can be viewed at the city's website: http://www.tigard- or.gov/community/parks/jack park.asp • At the upcoming April 12 meeting, city staff and the landscape designer will discuss changes to the park design based on feedback received from the February meeting,with special attention toward incorporating community gardens into the site plan. Property owners and residents are encouraged to share their thoughts and suggestions at the meeting. In November 2010,Tigard voters passed a $17 million park and open space bond measure. Money from the bond will be used to design and develop the park. If you have questions, or if you cannot attend the meeting and would like to comment, contact Park and Facilities Manager Steve Martin at 503.718.2583 or steve@tigard-or.gov. • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov 11 0 i''' '4 74i#:: ''.-I e4-'....'''''.:4* City of Tigard Jack Park-Vicinity Map : • a aew a 704:41' %tit,1 t.. .,,,. , ,, . ,, : - - 04,...i. i At 1 , .... !` ,, Jack Park ` - ' 4',.r. J , . 4r04. 10.4, 2,&, ,, .0. ., .„ �, 4 .+� 7' 10 1, 'i____ ,,-- .. ?..,::, ,.....,to, ,,40%,,, t kfr _ ' ., iI tit* , • 7- ,- ' , r. , . , .-.-li . .. - 4+ e d b. r 1 ,. to r _ f r w C fp - I<._ , , , SIP 4, r I :. : log*� " -r iti4 -+.� . .:iv. , .", Station 5O .. r P y 1. , . -. .. ' � , y.�. to w &, , "� — WALNUT ST • 1 ..t d1 l4 ei} X ' Yam;t `' .'5 1k;,��r Yt "; . 4 ' - .. • 1114 Neighborhood Meeting Information TIGARD The City of Tigard requires developers to hold a neighborhood meeting to notify affected property owners about their proposed development. This is done as part of the development review process for most land use applications. Below are some frequently asked questions about the neighborhood meeting process. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? The purpose of the meeting is to allow the prospective developer to share with you what they are planning to do. This is your opportunity to become informed of their proposed development and to let them know what issues or concerns you have in regard to their proposal. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING? After the neighborhood meeting,the prospective developer finalizes their submittal package (often taking into account citizen concerns) and submits an application to the city. Sometimes it takes awhile before the developer's application is ready to submit, so there could be several months between the neighborhood meeting and the submittal of an application. Once an application is submitted to the city,staff reviews it for completeness. Once an application has been deemed complete, the formal application review begins. It takes approximately six to eight weeks from the time the • application is accepted for a decision to be made. Many types of applications require a public hearing at which citizens are given the opportunity to provide comments or concerns.Property owners within 500 feet will be notified after a complete application is submitted.They will be provided an opportunity to comment.Any appeals are decided based on the provisions of applicable laws and the development code. WHAT IF THE PROPOSAL PRESENTED AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING IS NOT WHAT IS ACTUALLY SUBMITTED? Applicants are not required to submit exactly what was presented at the neighborhood meeting if it generally follows the type of development proposed. This provides for the opportunity to address the neighborhood issues and address other changes necessitated by the development or staff. If the project is significantly different,a new neighborhood meeting would be required as determined by staff. HOW DO I KNOW WHAT ISSUES ARE VALID? A decision is reviewed based on compliance with Title 18 of the Tigard Municipal Code (also known as the Community Development Code).Review the city's development code to familiarize yourself with what is permitted and what may not be permitted. A copy of the development code is available for viewing at the Tigard Public Library,on the city's web site at www.tigard-or.gov,or a copy may be purchased by contacting our records division www.tigard-or.govicity_halliservices/public_records/.You may also contact city planning staff by calling 503-718-2421 and ask what the standards are for a specific issue. If a development meets the code standards,it can proceed. For your assistance, attached is a list of questions that may assist you in determining your position on • a particular proposal. Typical Questions to Help Ensure Common • TIGARD Neighborhood Concerns are Considered The following is a list of questions intended to aid you in formulating your own questions for proposed development in your area. Feel free to ask more or alter the questions to address your own unique concerns and interests. PROCESS ► What applications are you(the developer) applying for?When do you expect to submit the application(s) so that neighbors can review it?What changes or additions are expected prior to submittal? ► Will the decision on the application be made by city staff, hearings officer,Tigard Planning Commission or City Council?How long is the process? (timing) / At what point in the process are citizens given notice and the opportunity to provide input? / Has a pre-application conference been held with City of Tigard staff? • Have any preliminary requirements been addressed or have any critical issues been identified? • What city planner did you speak with regarding this project? (This person is generally the planner assigned to the land use case and the one to contact for additional information). STREETS • ► Will there be a traffic study done?What are the preliminary traffic impacts anticipated as a result of the development and how do you propose to mitigate the impacts if necessary? ► What street improvements (including sidewalks) are proposed?What connections to existing streets are proposed? ► Are streets proposed to be public or private?What are the proposed street and sidewalk widths? ► What are the emergency access requirements and what is proposed to meet those requirements? ZONING AND DENSITY / What is the current zoning?What uses are allowed under this zoning? / Will there be a re-zone requested by the developer? If yes, to what zone? ► How many units are proposed for the development and what is the minimum and maximum number of units allowed in the zone? DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ► What is your erosion control and drainage plan?What is the natural slope of the property?What are the grading plans? ► Is there a water quality facility planned within the development and where will it be located?Who will own and maintain the facility? TREES AND LANDSCAPING / What are the tree removal plans and what is proposed to mitigate for trees removed? ► What are the landscaping plans?What buffering or fencing is required and/or proposed? • ADDITIONAL INFORMATION / How do I request more information or a follow-up meeting from/with the applicant? ®aJ rcc!- l.avcla oefill along line to Use Avery®Template 5161® Feed Paper " '"!" expose Pop-up Edge7M \ \AVE1 03951T" Gretchen Buchner Patty Newth 13249 SW 136th Place 12180 SW Merestone Court Tigard, OR 97224 Tigard, OR 97223 • Don &Dorothy Erdt Heidi Brenneman 13 760 SW 121st Avenue 11680 SW Tigard Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Tigard, OR 97223 Ellen Beilstein 14630 SW 139th Avenue Tigard, OR 97224 Todd Harding and Blake Hering Jr. Norris Beggs R Simpson 121 SW Morrison, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 Vanessa Foster 13085 SW Hoed Drive Tigard, OR 97223 Susan Beilke 11755 SW 114th Place Tigard,Old 7 CPO 4B 16200 SW Pacific Highway, Suite H242 Tigard, OR 97224 Patricia Kees 12195 SW 121st Avenue Tigard, OR 97223 John Frewing 7110 SW Lola Lane Tigard, OR 97223 Shannen Rappold Marketing/Business Development Manager Perlo Construction 7190 SW Sandburg Street Portland, OR 97223 !! tt' tl7tt �" ti r�fT A,�NTE D PdilES Filcurpin\Setupllab �rir 3fi"dm U P D• ."o=d449E!?Ri Utiiisez le gab.ari 1 RY a argeme l; A reveler a relio od-up 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Ise Avery®Template 5161® Feed Paper " '''"' 1 expose Pop-up Edger"' �r`r 6��r �70 I 2S104AA02700 25104AA02400 WEISS,STEVEN R&REBECCA M WYFFELS,HENRY R 12255 SW 126TH AVE 12265 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S104AA13000 2S103B803301 WILLIAMS,JERALD T/SHARON K YANDLE FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 12520 SW 128TH AVE SY JOHN C/HEATHER A YANDLE TRS TIGARD,OR 97223 2804 MISSION COLLEGE BLVD SANTA CLARA,CA 95054 2S1038C05001 2S10313600700 WING LOUIE FAMILY LIMITED PARTNE YINGER FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST PO BOX 86404 BY YINGER,KENT L&DEBORAH LYN TRS PORTLAND,OR 97206 12545 SW 124TH AVE PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S103BB05800 2S103BB01400 WINKLER,L DUANE/MARIE B ZAGORODNEY,WENDY M&DAVID L 12520 SW 124TH AVE 12476 BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05200 28103BC09900 WINSTON,MARK ZAKRZEWSKI,CHAPIN ORR WINSTON,ZSUZSANNA 12785 SW BLUE HERON PL 17576 LAKE HAVEN DR TIGARD,OR 97223 LAKE OSWEGO, 97035 4111104AA04900 NSTON,MARK&ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE HAVEN RD LAKE OSWEGO,OR 97035 2S104AA05000 WINSTON,MARK&ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE HAVEN DR LAKE OSWEGO, 97035 2S104AA 1.00 WINSTON, &ZSUZSANNA 17576 LAKE VEN DR LAKE OS G OR 97035 25104AD02600 WIRTHLIN,JOSEPH E 12919 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC08400 iliOD,JOANNE 70 SW BLUE HERON PL ARD.OR 97223 iquettes faciles a peter A i Replies a la hachure afin de www.avery.com :ilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 �a y 9"VCI- mil LAW I Ws. j aenu along line W ® TM Use Avery®Template 5151® Feed Paper �"� expose Pop-up EdgeTM AVE3961 2S104AA01700 2S104 04501 SMITH,ROGER E&MELE K TIGARD, F 12305 SW BELL CT 13125 SW LL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD R 7223 • 2S104AA04100 2S103BB06300 SPAULDING,CORAL TIGAR I OF 12670 SW KAREN ST 13125 SW LL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGAR OR 3 2S104AA05700 2S104AA04600 STEDMAN, HAL G JR&CATHERINE F TIGA CITY OF 12740 SW WILLS PL 13125 S ALL BLVD TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD 7223 2S104AA00700 23104A000400 STONE,HARVEY L CAROL P TORRES,ROSENDO:HERNANDEZ 12600 SW BELL COURT BOTELLO,MARIA ODILIA TIGARD,OR 97223 12755 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02300 2S104AD04500 STROUD,TERRY TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE BATTILEGA,STEPHANIE 20665 SW BLANTON ST 12285 SW 127TH AVE ALOHA,OR 97007 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA03800 2S104AA02100 . SUTTON,UME S VANDERVORT,GERALD E AND SUTTON,STEPHEN N CARRIE L 12580 SW KAREN 12335 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 - TIGARD,OR97223 2S104A00120O 2S104AA00800 TAYLOR,JAMES D VANNICE-BARE,SARAH 12745 SW WALNUT ST 12550 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA00400 25104AA13700 THIES,JOHN A JR&JULIA M VENHEIM,JOHN K AND 12555 SW 127TH AVE LYNETTE E TIGARD,OR 97223 12300 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 25104 4400 25104AA04700 TIGARD,C WATSON,MITCHELL F/MARY P 13125 SW H 29650 NW OLSON RD TIGARD,O 9 3 GASTON,OR 97119 2S104AA7 00 25104AD02200 TIGARD,CI WEINEL,BRAD OWEN 13125 SW HA 12555 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,0 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 ctiaqueites fact+es a peier A i ic2pne2 a+a hachure en de www,aver}r.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY Use Avery®Template 51610 Feed Paper j expose Pop-up EdgeTM t \ kVRYJ5961TM J 2S104AD04600 2S104AA90091 PHAM,HAO E? RUTLEDGE,JOEL WALTER NGUYEN,LAIT ' 14782 SW WOODHUE ST 16144 NW GILLIHAN RD TIGARD,OR 97224 ioRTLAND,OR 97231 2S104AD02800 2S104AA03900 PHAM,HA D SAXMAN,J BROOKE HI& NGUYEN, T DEBORA 16144 NW IL AN RD 12640 SW KAREN PORT D,OR 97231 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC10000 2S104AA04500 PLINSKI,CHRISTIE M SCHILLING,KENNETH L 12775 SW BLUE HERON PL DONNA M TIGARD,OR 97223 12400 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD00600 2S104AA12200 QUEAHPAMA,RALPH G&MICHELLE K SCHRADER,MARCUS J&ROBERTA L 12730 SW MARIE CT 12490 SW 129TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01500 2S1036801200 RASMUSSEN,VENETA M& SCHREINER,STEVEN A AND PAUL VICTOR ANNE-LY 12755 SW 128TH 12425 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 fiO3BC04200 2S104AD04300 ll,JULIE M SEVERSON,EVERETT 0 12430 SW WALNUT ST BY DENNIS OLSON TIGARD,OR 97223 12540 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02000 - 2S104AD06000 RENDA,JOHN J SHELDON,CHARLOTTE M 12395 SW 127TH AVE 12932 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05400 2S103BC04900 ROBINSON,CRAIG WIDENISE E SHULTS,BRUCE L 12225 SW 127TH AVE 12625 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104A000200 2S104AA01200 ROHR,RICHARD A SMITH,JANET C 1107 SITKA AVE 12350 SW BELL CT NEWBERG,OR 97132 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA04800 2S1036C09700 SSELL,DAVID E II&DENISE M SMITH,MARGARET M 30X 643 12885 SW BLUE HERON PL VERTON,OR 97075 TIGARD,OR 97223 :iquettes fad es a peter A 1 Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com tilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 raa) rzcr- 1.6121Jc1a 1 OVAL CIVII9 1111C IV j�, VERY@5951TM Use Avery®Template 5161® Feed Paper ��l expose Pop-up EdgeTm 1j�\A A 2S1038801800 2S104AA01500 KEOUGH, DOUGLAS J AND MARSHA D LIVENGOOD,TERRY W&ROBERTA L 12475 SW BROOK CT 12255 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 23104AD01100 23104,4002000 KERR,LORI L LU,RANDY S/LORNA K 12760 SW 128TH AVE 12605 SW 128TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 251038C03800 - 2S104AA03600 KESSLER,MARGUERITE E LYNCH,JEREMIAH J&ERIN J 12425 SW ALBERTA 12515 SW KAREN ST TIGARD,OR 97223 - PORTLAND,OR 97223 2S104AA12000 251036E306000 KIERNAN,JILL ANN - . - . .MAAG,WAYNE H 12495 SW 129TH AVE AND ALTA L TIGARD,OR 97223 12580SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01600 2S103BC05002 KLEFFNER,THOMAS ANTHONY MAHONEY,ROBERT&ELAINE JNT LIV PERRI,FRANCIS TIMOTHY %EBNER,DARIUS WOLFGANG 4975 SW 65TH AVE 1260 12TH ST PORTLAND,OR 97221 WEST LINN,OR 97068 25103B801000 _ 25103B805900 • KLEVE,RUSSELL C MANAHAN,WILLIAM D&CHARLENE A 12475 SW 124TH AVE 12550 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02600 25104AA12900 KNIGHT,ROBERT W MATTHEWS,BRIAN&ANNE-MARIE 12665 SW KAREN ST 12515 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA131130 2S104AD03500 LARSEN,CHRISTINE J MCLEOD,JOYCE& 12500 SW 128TH AVE SAFFORD,AUDREY G TIGARD,OR 97223 229 E WARREN COMMON FREMONT,CA 94539 2S103BC04600 2S1036C04500 LAWRENCE,JUSTIN MCUT REAL ESTATE,LLC 19311 NE 101STAVE PO.BOX 725 BATTLEGROUND,WA 98604 PROSSEN,WA 99350 2S104AD03401 25104AA01800 LEWIS FAMILY REV TRUST MEATH,SHAWN DANIEL BY LEWIS,BRIAN C&CHRISTINE C TR 12445 SW BELL CT 12828 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 etiquettes faciles a peter A i Repiiez a is hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5161® Sens de chargement 1 reveler 1e rebord Pop-upni 1-800-GO-AVERY , aay rcci- a.a ucu I Dena diong me to 43,Ise Avery®Template 51610 Feed Paper ®j expose Pop-up EdgeTN1 5951T"" 2S10381303400 25104AA12700 HARSHFIELD,RUTH A JACKSON,JEFFREY R 12505 SW KAREN$T 12455 SW 128TH AVE •TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA05800 2S104AA00200 HARSTAD,CHERYL L JACKSON,JOSEPH E&HEATHER L 12750 SW WILLS PL 12775 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97771 TIGARD,OR 97223 251038805700 2S104AD03501 HARTFIELD,LEE E AND APRIL L JAM,CHRISTOPHER M& 12500 SW 124TH GRAHAM,LAURA J TIGARD,OR 97223 12820 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C08500 2S103BC09800 HAWES,DIANES - JEL1NEK,GARYL REV.LIVTRUST 12780 SW BLUE HERON PL 12805 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S1038C09500 2S103BB01300 HILL,LAWRENCE JOHNSON,ARIC STORY,DE ANN M 12405 SW 124TH AVE 12900 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 11104AA13500 - 25104AD04000 HJORTH,RAMONA C JONES,DAVID R&AMY L 12360 SW 128TH 12570 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 251038600900 2S104AD00300 HOLCOMB,FREDERICK P JONES,JAM]SARA 12515 SW 124TH AVE 12775 SW MARIE CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD05800 2S104AA01100 HOLM,RICHARD KEARNEY,JOSHUA L&STACEY L 12896 SW SEVILLA AVE 12400 SW BELL CT PORTLAND.OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104,4002100 - 2S103BB00500 HOPP,CARL W III KELLY,PATRICIA M&MARLEEN MARY HACKENMILLER,TIFFANY M 12565 SW 124TH 12585 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD04400 25104AA12300 iGCSON,GARLA KEMPTER,ROBERT W JR AND 20 SW WALNUT ST LYNN D ARD,OR 97223 12480 SW 129TH TIGARD,OR 97223 iquettes fades a peter Ai Repiiez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com :ilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY caoy runt—anue�s — I lsena along line to //.� J4VER i®3961TM Use Avery®Template 5161® Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM 28103BC05003 2S103BC05004 EBNER,DARIUS FURST,EDGAR&ANNA LIVING TRUST 1260 12TH 13850 SW BONNIE BRAE CT WEST LINN,OR 97068 BEAVERTON,OR 97005 • 2S104AD01000 2S104AD02900 ENDICOTT,JOHN A GARDINER,GAIL E 12730 SW 128TH AVE 8015 SW CANYON LN TIGARD,OR 97223 PORTLAND,OR 97225 2S103BB06100 - 2S104AA09200 ENGLISH,JAMES& GONZALEZ,JOSE M HAYES,JEANETTE 12240 SW 127TH AVE 12600 SW 124TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA01900 2S104AA04200 ESTRADA,AMY a,RAY GOULET,GERALD TA LAURA M 12545 SW BELL CT 12300 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA00500 2S104AA04400 FEDERIUK,ISAAC&NAOMI GREENBERG-NICHOLAS,CAROLYN I 12475 SW 127TH AVE NICHOLAS,KALLA TIGARD,OR 97223 GREENBERG,PATRICIA A 12360 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 25104A002300 2S104AD05600 1110 FOERSTER,JAMES W AND GROSS,WAYNE E JO NELLE GROSS,JANE A 12535 SW 128TH 12862 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 - - TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC04800 2S104AA05300 FORD,WILLIAM H&SHEILA C HALE,THOMAS L&TERESA L 12675 SW 124TH 12245 SW 127TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97224 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC04700 2S103BC04400 FRANCO,HECTORS NAMES,BEVERLY J 12705 SW 124TH AVE PO BOX23115 TIGARD,OR. 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 2S103BB01700 2S104AD06300 FRANCO,VICTOR M HANSEN,ERIC L&LESLIE A 12479 SW BROOK CT 12915 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB00400 2S104AD06400 FRANZEN,NORMAN R HANSE RI &LESLIE A JANET E 12915 SW NUT ST • 12605 SW 124TH TIGARD, 9 3 TIGARD,OR 97223 `rtiquettes faciles a peier A Repiiez a is hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargernent j reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY Use Avery®Template 5161® Feed Paper �1 expose Pop-up EdgeTM I/l��I ttv¢scr�3yo 1 2S104AD03900 2S1038603300 CARLTON,MARK M.&BRENDA G. DANIEL GRANT LLC PO BOX 230398 BY YOZAMP,KIMBERLYN A TIGARD,OR 97281 12407 SW 133RD AVE • TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD05700 2S104AD05900 CHAN,LAWRENCE DARBY,JOHN R&KIMBERLY BRASHLE LAM,LINH 12918 SW SEVILLA AVE 12884 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BC09200 2S1038C09300 CHEN,LETTY P DAVIS,ALISON K 12870 SW BLUE HERON PL 12880 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01800 2S103BB01100 CONNOR,CATHLEEN P DAVIS,f ELISSAD 12655 SW 128TH AVE 12465 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA01300 2S104AD00100 COOK,DALE J/JENNIFER N B DECHANE,JENNIFER 12300 SW BELL CT BODE,JUANITA TIGARD,OR 97223 12600 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 04AA00300 2S103BB01500 0MWELL,SAMUEL T DONOVAN,RUTH REVOCABLE MARGARET A LIVING TRUST 12665 SW 127TH 12480 SW BROOK CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD01400 2S104AD05500 CRONHOLM,SCOTT M DUBOIS,JASON B&SHANNON N 12705 SW WALNUT 12848 SW SEVILLA AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD03504 2S104A002400 CULWELL,LESLIE D AND OURDEL,NICLAUS C DIANNA L 12925 SW WALNUT ST 12800 SW WALNUT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD03503 2S103B600800 CULWELL,LESLIE DNDIANNA L DURHAM,STEVEN W&SHELLEY L 12800 SW WALNUT ST 12525 SW 124TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA02500 2S104AD04800 'ANG,BENJAMIN&MAI VO EASLEY,JOHN H&MARGARET M A5 SW KAREN ST innSW WALNUT ST RD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 `.iguettes ladles a peler ♦ i Repllez a is hachure afin de www.avery.com tilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5161® Sens de chargement 1 reveler le rebord Pop-upT" 1-800-GO-AVERY .�, .G_ o.ciaacsa ., v .0 AAAVERY05961TM Use Averye TEMPLATE 5961TM Feed Paper 1=111•••••• gm for Easy Peel Feature 1 2S104AD00500 2S104AA90202 ABRAHAMSON,BRUCE Q&SHERRY L BASTIN,JOHN C 12735 SW MARIE CT PO BOX 231086 TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97281 • 2S104AA01400 2S103B600600 ALLENDER,TARA&THOMAS BECKER,OLIVE ANN TRUST 12270 SW BELL CT 12555 SW 124TWAVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA13200 2S104AD02801 ALLISON,TIMOTHY D BEELER,BECKY 12470 SW 128TH AVE 12945 SW WALNUT ST TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA12600 2S103BC10100 ANDERSON,PETER J&JENNIFER G BEER,DONALD E&JANET L 12380 SW 129TH AVE 12765 SW BLUE HERON PL TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S103BB01900 2S10 90000 ANDRE,RONALD J&MURIEL BELLW DT RACE CONDOMINIUMS 12355 SW 124TH AVE OWNERS UNITS TIGARD,OR 97223 , 000 2S104AD03505 2S104AA90331 • AUGUST,THOMAS A BELLWOOD TERRACE LLC 12810 SW WALNUT ST PO BOX 189 TIGARD.OR 97223 YAMHILL,OR 97148 2S104 03502 25104AA 011 AUGUS , H AS A BELLWOO TER CE LLC 12810 SW LNUT ST PO BOX 189 TIGARD R 223 _ YAMHILL,0 148 25104AA01600 23104AA9 22 AUSTIN,KURT R&KARI M BELLWOOD R CE LLC 12285 SW BELL CT PO BOX 189 TIGARD,OR 97223 YAMHILL,0 9 25104A005400 2S104AA90022 BARCLAY,JAMES LEE - BELLWOOD CE LLC STITES,KATHERINE MARIE PO BOX 189 12826 SW SEVILLA AVE YAMHILL,O 97 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AD00900 2S104AA90311 BARMETTLER,KEVIN P&MARY C BELLWOOD TE RA" LLC 12790 SW MARIE CT PO BOX 189 • TIGARD,OR 97223 YAMHILL,OR 97 Etiquettes facites a paler A w Consuitez la feuiiie ww .avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY°5961"'c Sens de chargement d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY .4uky reri uuru 1 eenu d1U11 line w Ise Avery®Template 5161® Feed Paper �� expose Popp EdgeTM \ ?.\ ERY@5961T" 1 2S104 90142 25104AA03700 BELLW D RACE LLC BRAY,WILLIAM R&DENISE E PO BOX 1 12520 SW KAREN ST ''AMHILL 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 • 2S104AA90151 2S104A000800 BELL O ERRACE LLC GRAZER,GREG R&ELIZABETH A PO BOX 12770 SW MARIE CT YAMHILL 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA90162 25104A1301300 BELLW OD RRACE LLC BROWN,DOUGLAS L&STEPHANIE L PO BOX 9 12725 SW WALNUT YAMHILL, 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90171 2S104AA12800 BELLWrRACE LLC BROWN,Ht1CHAEL K BONNIE L BO 12485 D R1 97 AVE YAMHIL148 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA90181 2S104AA00600 BELLW D ERRACE LLC BROWN,SHANE L&STEPHANIE PO BOX 1 12720 SW BELL CT YAMHIL ,OR -7148 TIGARD,OR 97223 11104AA90191 2S103BC08600 BELL O TERRACE LLC BURTZOS,SANDRA L PO BOX 9 12790 SW BLUE HERON PL YAMHIL , 97148 TIGARD,OR 97223 25104AA13600 2S104AA01000 BERG,JONATHAN W&UNSAY M BYE,JUSTIN T 12320 SW 128TH AVE 12450 SW BELL CT TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 251038C10200 2S103BC09600 BLUE HERON PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOC BYLES,NANCY FAMILY REVOC LIVING PO BOX 231263 PO BOX 230209 PORTLAND,OR 97281 PORTLAND.OR 97281 25104AA13400 - 2S103BC04000 BOND,SUSAN R REVOCABLE LNMNG T CAMERON,DONNA IRENE BY BOND,SUSAN R TR 12490 SW WALNUT ST 12410 SW 128TH AVE TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 2S104AA04300 2S104AA12400 NONO,DENNIS ROBERT AND CANUTT,PAUL R&KAY M OL LYN 12470 SW 129TH AVE 320 SW 127TH TIGARD,OR 97223 TIGARD,OR 97223 :iqueetes faciles a peler A I RPpiiez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com 1 tilisez le gabarit AVERY®5161® Sens de chargement 1 reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Jam and Smudge Free Printing aIIMMIK WwW.averyxom C\ AVERYO 5961TM We Avery®TEMPLATE 5961Tm 1-800-GO-AVERY 2S104AA90031 2S104AA90071 BELL OD T RACE LLC BELL O ERRACE LLC PO BOX 8 PO BOX YAMHIL R 97148 YAMHI ,O 7148 • 2S10X - 2S104 90082 BELLRACE LLC BELL TERRACE LLC POB PO BOX 9 YAM148 YAMHI , 97148 2S104 9004 28104+ •12 2 BELLW D ERRACELLC B€LLW••• ERRACELLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 1:• YAMHI OR 7148 YAMHIL 0- 97148 2S104 0291 2S104AA90102 BELLWO RRACELLC BELLW TERRACE LLC PO BOX IS PO BOX 9 YAMHILL, 148 YAMHI , 97148 2S104AA90051 2S104AA90231 BELLW D T RACE LLC BELL ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX 9 YAMHILL R 148 YAMHI ,O 97148 2S104AA90281.. 2S104AA90111 • BELL OD RRACELLC BELLW TERRACE LLC PO BOX PO BOX 1 YAMHI ,O 7148 YAMHIL ,OR 7148 2S104AA90061 2S104AA90121 BELL OD RACE LLC BELLW ERRACE LLC PO BOX PO BOX I YAMHILL R 7148 YAMHIL , 97148 2S104AA90271 - 2S104 0222 BELL 000 T RRACELLC BELLW D ERRACE LLC PO BO 69 PO BOX 1 YAMHILL, 97148 YAMHIL O 7148 2S104AA90262 2S104 90131 BELLW D'T CE LLC BELL O ERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX YAMHILL, 8 YAMHIL 97148 2S104AA90251 2S104AA90 11 BELLWO D T RRACE LLC BELL ••') TERRACE LLC PO BOX 1 PO BOX :9 • YAMHILL,0 97148 YAMHIL , •- 97148 � �a3hti O�J (109 l 3�19651uege6 ai zasti�� ,wL96S ®�ajgAV 1 2Y J woiy(,tane`nnnnnn aotdet a6einas e la a6eaanodnue uotssaadwi AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING/POSTING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE IMPORTANT NOrTICE: THE APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO MAIL THE. CITY OF TIGARD A COPY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE THAT PERTAINS TO THIS AFFIDAVIT AT THE SAME TIME PROPERTY OWNERS ARE MAILED NOTICE,TO THE ADDRESS BELOW: City of Tigard Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223-8189 IN ADDITION,THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT THIS AFFIDAVIT &COPIES OF ALL NOTICES AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION. MAILING: ,ten I, 5,.�we�/✓�q.2x-kJ ,being duly sworn,depose and say that on the a S day of ill/$1-I'4". 2p�,I caused to have mArled to h of th prsons on the attached list,a notice of a meeting to discuss a proposed development at (or near) ,1i�C Pr-e a r �ru^, a copy of which notice so mailed is attached hereto and made a part of hereof. I further state that said notices were enclosed in envehee plainly dr,�e sed t000ssai persons and were deposited on the date indicated above in the United States Post Office located at 77 LJ with postage prepaid thereon. ..)1A--- 44(1/ Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) POSTING: I, 7-vc__ rY?__( N L1 do affirm that I am(represent)the party initiating interest in a proposed land use application for J i�-r/L / /a-/L/C- rT f'-f,d w affecting the land located at(s to the approxima ,,,,I-� location(s)IF no address(s)and all tax lot(s)currently registered) / ?�t7 5 w h�,� _ l(o el-LA-4— '"�'� ,and did on the a day of M so.it .) ,20/?— personally post notice indicating that the site may be proposed for a }>p*t-/t_- 7',rev'.t-0-4"44" land use application,and the time, date and place of a neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposaL The sign was posted `J at (J t 2 5 1 b'f AD v `f 5-0 I (Ad j A t- 0 T✓Fi- Fti _s� ,- S-e) /a a/7 SA) wm-44,r) (state location you posted notice on property) , LN— h770' — Signature (In the presence of a Notary Public) (THIS SECTION FOR A STATE OF OREGON,NOTARY PUBLIC TO COMPLETE/NOTARIZE) STATE OF ) County of ) ss. Q Subscribed and swom/affirmed before me on the o1--1 day of M ,20 13— . .*;- OFFICIAL SEAL COMMISSION NO.459844 NOTARY P IC OF OREGON LAY•• ION EXPIRES JUY 08,2015 My Commission Expires: 7 j(o I f, i\duple\onstets\neighborhood meetWaffalavit of nniliog-PO5ring neighborhood meetingdoc Page 5 • Appendix C. Service Provider Letter • • Appendix C C-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 •CleanWater Services Our colunhilnx-nl i> cicnr. CWS File Number Service Provider Letter 12-001787 This form and the attached conditions will serve as your Service Provider Letter in accordance with Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (R&O 07-20). Jurisdiction: City of Tigard Review Type: Tier 2 Analysis Site Address SPL Issue Date: September 13, 2012 /Location: Tigard, OR 97223 SPL Expiration Date: September 13, 2014 Applicant Information: Owner Information: Name Name Company CITY OF TIGARD Company CITY OF TIGARD Address 13125 SW HALL BLVD Address 13125 SW HALL BLVD TIGARD OR 97223 TIGARD OR 97223 Phone/Fax (503)718-2583 Phone/Fax (503)718-2583 E-mail: steve@tigard-or.gov E-mail: steve@tigard-or.gov Tax lot ID Development Activity 2S104AA04600, 2S104AD04501 Trail and Park Improvements Pre-Development Site Conditions: Post Development Site Conditions: •Sensitive Area Present: I I On-Site n Off-Site Sensitive Area Present: n On-Site X Off-Site Vegetated Corridor Width: 50 Vegetated Corridor Width: 50 Vegetated Corridor Condition: Marginal/Degraded Enhancement of Remaining Vegetated Corridor Required: X Square Footage to be enhanced: 24,736 Encroachments into Pre-Development Vegetated Corridor: Type and location of Encroachment: Square Footage: Trail (Temporary Encroachment; Planting/Mitigation in place) 7,659 Trail and Swale(Permanent Encroachment; Mitigation required) 3,453 Mitigation Requirements: Type/Location Sq. Ft./Ratio/Cost On-site Mitigation/2S104AA04600 4,594/1:1.33 Total area required to be planted to District density standards 36,989 X Conditions Attached f I Development Figures Attached(3) ❑Planting Plan Attached Geotech Report Required This Service Provider Letter does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered on your property. • Pape 1 of 7 12-001787 • CWS File Number CWS File No. 12-001787; Memo to Respond to Tier 2 Regulations Acceptance of the encroachment proposed as part of a Tier 2 Alternatives Analysis shall be based on meeting all the following criteria: 1. The proposed encroachment area is mitigated in accordance with Section 3.08. The proposed permanent vegetated corridor encroachments will be mitigated within park boundaries, northeast of the project area in accordance with Section 3.08 of R&O 07-20.The proposed mitigation ratio of 1 to 1.33 for impacts to marginal and degraded communities meets the criteria set forth in table 3-2, Section 3.08.2. The replacement(mitigation)areas are in addition to the existing vegetated corridor and are contiguous.Temporary encroachments for access and staging will be replanted to District Density Standards. 2.The replacement mitigation protects the functions and values of the Vegetated Corridor and Sensitive Area. The proposed vegetated corridor rnit;aatinn plan has been designed to protect the functions and values of the sensitive areas and vegetated corridor.Mitigation is proposed for upland areas adjoining existing vegetated corridors north of Krueger Creek and associated wetlands.Mitigation associated with the project totals 4,594 square feet. 3.Enhancement of the replacement area,if not already in Good Corridor Condition,and either the remaining Vegetated Corridor on the site or the first 50 feet of width closest to the resource,whichever is less,to a Good Corridor Condition. • Proposed replacement and enhancement areas range from degraded to marginal condition,despite the general presence of native species in the canopy where present. Invasive species are common throughout proposed replacement and enhancement areas.The applicant will remove invasive species from all replacement and enhancement areas and as necessary,plant native trees, shrubs,and herbaceous cover. 4. A District Stormwater Connection Permit is likely to be issued based on proposed plans. The proposed project is located in Tigard. The applicant reasonably expects to obtain a District Stormwater Connection Permit based on proposed plans for the project. 5.Location of development and site planning minimizes incursion into the Vegetated Corridor. Encroachment into the adjacent vegetated corridor has been minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Vegetated corridor encroachments are limited to those necessary for construction of the ADA compliant trail, the trail loop,the Krueger Creek crossing,and swale. 6.No practicable alternative to the location of the development exists that will not disturb the Sensitive Area or Vegetated Corridor. Several trail locations were evaluated for placement within Jack Park. The City evaluated trail placement based on the location of natural resources and vegetated corridors within the park,as well as adjacent slopes. The trail has been located outside the vegetated corridor when possible.The City of Tigard's goal for new park facilities is that new trails be fully ADA accessible.The proposed trail is located to facilitate the grading necessary to make it ADA compliant,and still provide adequate space for future amenities.Moving the trail southeast(towards the fue station)outside of the vegetated corridor would not meet ADA requirements,or allow room for future amenities such as community gardens or playground areas. • Page 2 of 7 • 12-001787 GWS File Number The swale is located south of the proposed trail because it is an area down slope of the proposed improvements, and the slopes to the south are higher than the proposed pavement. 7. The proposed encroachment provides public benefits. In addition to direct public benefits provided by the trail, public benefits to water quality will be provided by a combined area of 29,330 square feet of proposed vegetated corridor enhancements and mitigation. Additional mitigation has also been proposed so that the mitigation is more than the 1:1 ratio requirement. In order to comply with Clean Water Services water quality protection requirements the project must comply with the following conditions: 1. No structures, development, construction activities, gardens, lawns, application of chemicals, uncontained areas of hazardous materials as defined by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, pet wastes, dumping of materials of any kind, or other activities shall be permitted within the sensitive area or Vegetated Corridor which may negatively impact water quality, except those allowed in R&O 07-20, Chapter 3. 2. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction the Vegetated Corridor and water quality sensitive areas shall be surveyed, staked, and temporarily fenced per approved plan. During construction the Vegetated Corridor shall remain fenced and undisturbed except as allowed by R&O 07-20, Section 3.06.1 and per approved plans. 3. If there is any activity within the sensitive area,the applicant shall gain authorization for the project from the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) and US Army Corps of • Engineers (USACE). The applicant shall provide Clean Water Services or its designee (appropriate city)with copies of all DSL and USACE project authorization permits. 4. An approved Oregon Department of Forestry Notification is required for one or more trees harvested for sale, trade, or barter, on any non-federal lands within the State of Oregon. 5. Prior to ground disturbance an Erosion Control Permit is required through the City. Appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's)for Erosion Control, in accordance with Clean Water Services' Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual, shall be used prior to, during, and following earth disturbing activities. 6. Prior to construction, a Stormwater Connection Permit from Clean Water Services or its designee is required pursuant to Ordinance 27, Section 4_B_ 7. Activities located within the 100-year floodplain shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 5.10. 8. Removal of native, woody vegetation shall be limited to the greatest extent practicable. 9. The water quality swale shall be planted with Clean Water Services approved native species, and designed to blend into the natural surroundings. 10. Should final development plans differ significantly from those submitted for review by Clean Water Services, the applicant shall provide updated drawings, and if necessary, obtain a revised Service Provider Letter. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 11. The Vegetated Corridor width for sensitive areas within the project site shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide, as measured horizontally from the delineated boundary of the sensitive area. 12. For Vegetated Corridors up to 50 feet wide, the applicant shall enhance 24,736 sf of the Vegetated Corridor to meet or exceed good corridor condition as defined in R&O 07-20, Section 3.14.2, Table 3-3. 13. Prior to any site clearing, grading or construction, the applicant shall provide Clean Water Services with a Vegetated Corridor enhancement/restoration plan. Enhancement/restoration of • the Vegetated Corridor shall be provided in accordance with R&O 07-20, Appendix A. Page 3 of 7 12-007787 _. • CWS File Number 14. Prior to installation of plant materials, all invasive vegetation within the Vegetated Corridor shall be removed per methods described in Clean Water Services' Integrated Pest Management Guide, 2009. During removal of invasive vegetation care shall be taken to minimize impacts to existing native tree and shrub species. 15. Maintenance and monitoring requirements shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.11.2. If at any time during the warranty period the landscaping falls below the 80%survival level,the owner shall reinstall all deficient planting at the next appropriate planting opportunity and the two year maintenance period shall begin again from the date of replanting. 16. Performance assurances for the Vegetated Corridor shall comply with R&O 07-20, Section 2.06.2. 17. Clean Water Services shall require an easement over the Vegetated Corridor conveying storm and surface water management to Clean Water Services that would prevent the owner of the Vegetated Corridor from activities and uses inconsistent with the purpose of the corridor and any easements therein. FINAL PLANS 18. Final construction plans shall include landscape plans. In the details section of the plans, a description of the methods for removal and control of exotic species, location, distribution, condition and size of plantings, existing plants and trees to be preserved, and installation methods for plant materials is required. Plantings shall be tagged for dormant season identification and shall remain on plant material after planting for monitoring purposes. 19. A Maintenance Plan shall be included on final plans including methods, responsible party contact information, and dates(minimum two times per year, by June 1 and September 30). 20. Final construction plans shall clearly depict the location and dimensions of the sensitive area and the Vegetated Corridor(indicating good, marginal, or degraded condition). • Sensitive area boundaries shall be marked in the field. 21. Protection of the Vegetated Corridors and associated sensitive areas shall be provided by the installation signage between the development and the outer limits of the Vegetated Corridors. Signage details to be included on final construction plans. This Service Provider Letter is not valid unless CWS-approved site plan is attached. Please call(503)681-3653 with any questions. Amber Wierck Environmental Plan Review Attachments (3) • Page 4 of 7 ..... - S ! �. PLANT COMMUNITY.A(17,163SF/0.39 AC)DEGRADED CONDITION 1. `, ,r-_-,` ± PLANT COMMUNITY B(15,556 SF/a.36 AC)MARGINAL CONDITION ' w 7.yrr' PLANT COMMUNITY C(12.937 SF/0.30 AC)DEGRADED CONDITIONI4V �� - ', 2'• PLANT COMMUNITY D(19,627 5F/0.45 AC)DEGRADED CONDITION I `�* • �4s �� Er, PLANT COMMUNITY E(13,663 SF/0.31 AC)MARGINAL CONDITION a :•• ;, I VEGETATION DATA POINT' .• ,• A PHOTODOCUMENTATION POINT •�-Q%-4 SLOPE MEASUREMENT 14 ' _+ '. ♦ I• WETLAND DATA POINT aV AI CREEK FLOW DIRECTION ♦♦ VEGETATED CORRIDOR BOUNDARY Ii•:{::{••:3. WETLANDS 0 _ ego� -_" -- _a .. / -3,.. ♦ /' o ♦ VEGETATED CORRIDOR-----; ♦ BOUNDARY I' C? ' ♦fl uxo ♦ o ae o� F= •Ar ew weswINGs PLANT COMMUNITY A r `h _ (17,163 SF/0.39 AC) •- • I OHW = `�3• _ KRUEGER CREE p 1 S 1-11.E- O 00 .. 4i Approved . , '. .• Clean Water Services ,.�'., -B Lr eve- e'a0T ♦ By A-+a Date q�r 3Ativ=s ,.' ' A ...g s,�• p - [, ( / •7t __ es" �0 ti3fl SRL I '1TALI•I' fai r i PLANT COMMUNITY C - � dA I ^ `r / . SSA (12,937SF/0.30AC) .. to LOT WO O BMW NCIML r •,�• TAX1pTA501 �+ I. 3 �• /.'.! \.....0:".:'•''• %• -_ r — t. -__, ®-- ear-F,m c,=_%• RI■ ® D • PLANT COMMUNITY B , (9,419 SF/0.22 AC) % PLANT COMMUNITI(E • ,'- '� •'r . • ti 53 .....-5•6• _ �hi��- , ,j ♦.<t- (13,663 SF/0.31 AC) ; ,, , , �rf,%•, Y " y J. 4, / it, r / f, •i .�� 'WETLAND D • _•,, ESTIMATED BY f eft' r' Q��A1 I i� ♦. PHS:ON 5/8/12 . T ,''/ ,. ,0 • • - •416 ,55V A • / H �1 ,r f •:: 'i :04 r p®4r tr4.,Q►'fbss�4'°A `. i�ir��f,� .�,�" �... ... ..::. ,�b4b,44!44b 4 b / -- _ PP ' �9lR4MATE'::. ::'.'.'....�.� 4A*bab-11 CENTE(uw:PF: ' :� .. `A9t.9brb ` .: .:: bG� a I ), _ 1 61EE% O - b,,b`'940444 4► �.0 ,a •: •, PLANT COMMUNITY D ,,, T_ ,: ,yda• (19,627 SF/0.45 AC) i 1 4bbb % . `_ f ?►64bair.4tibis T • I��bb,�tfa4;��b ,% ;� .... -" TVF&R _ ' 10 4,441b4b..411' i •-. 1), ��--^—� STATION SO 1 :,:� b .bib+b�4 ' •: '' 'b4bberg by WETLAND ' O.00009a _.. _ bb ib+F®41 -44,-b b b'b b4 --�_ `__ BOUNDARY b!/40• bbb . DELINEATED dpq®�6dhb a nr BY PBS(SPL �ti ,41 a+441* i 07-002492) ..os b' a4b b. '_1 - 41.Mt•1NLpla11.,��e��o - . S.W. WALNUT STREET ALE IN Fe ET FIGURE Existing conditions at Jack Park in Tigard, Oregon. Survey and bosemap provided. 4889 2 by Bluedot Group, 2012. See Tree Plan on Figure 5.. 7/26/12 Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. k II r Y\AUTOCAD\4800\4889 Jadc ParMPlot Dwas\Sa NRA.dwa.7/26/2012 2:10:26 PM —�- • 4111 • PERMANENT IMPACTS WITHIN THE OUTER 40%OT THE VEGETATED CORRIDOR ANDCREEK CROSSING , ,". , 2.576 SF10.06 ACRE IIIIII PERMANENT IMPACTS WITHIN THE INNER.60%OF THE VEGETATED CORRIDOR , - 877 SP/0.04 ACRE I in TRAIL OUTSIDE VEGETATED CORRIDOR . 2.582 SF/0.98 ACRE ' i 40. ... 44.44o, .. • 0 En TEMPORARY GRADING OUTSIDE VEGETATED CORRIDOR I,,10,330 SF/0.24 ACRE I,• / 4p 4: MN TEMPORARY GRADING INSIDE VEGETATED CORRIDOR • •*t 7,659 5I/0.1 8 ACRE •• • •• Nos4,N PLANTING AREAMOSWALE ,•,• ' tt•••\• 2,547 SP/0.06 ACRE • A. 4,.....404 ks...• WETLANDSffere. : TC. ri Poe ft it-IL.y • ir..-p......:17: i.$4.4,.4.4,":::- ,•4".444 \\*•. 00:,0 ri VEGETATED CORRIDOR zi-g. a_A-5 S44ALL .40 ,. ,.1cf--0A-c-44 ..e. i 4. / • 1 , . b TZ)), . t A ,.1 19 L,111-41--e- 15 r.:- 1 .r.-- o 1,J s in/ * 4 Pa. 477.- 1.- 411 --1, • 0'4'."040 ....4fr. 4k---: 4 4... ,,4,A. •, ::: ••W• •N"..' ‘-- • • ••.•.--'77-- SM IC- 0 s) • At*A, ,iti h,• . Oa.•-7:- 6 • „.„7.44;, ,,,, _ Ay 46,:::" /DS11-14,4 t)49 ••••••°' 0 S • , kh:wtsp. ........74,4-:::: ,...... .. r Af.04,41t.40.,/....:.:.:.. :.-: .:: • VEGETATED CORRIDOR ---- 4•0 BOUNDARY j . 4, 4:.::...:•...•:•:•:,%.::•-f #j•F•4° 40.4:.:.:.:-:.:...-.::...•, -di.PLAVUOUND ^ /44 4A, .#.•••••• ' •:.... ..':- •1 AP ir • - ' ,. 40/60 VEGETATED * ,1101,411114•:•':•':::::':":':.•;s9,-:-:-CORRIDOR LIMIT IP 4.44"- '4..:::::::::::.:•:•:•:•:•:.:: :::• .0.e ., , . " .r.4, ...x.:•:-:.:.::.:•:.:...::--=-- i. ••••., 4/.:.....,........-.,.. :-: j: 4t4-14.411"..'":':;: --F -. V v,*• ...%:.:....••-:-:- KRUEGER CREEK ' ' •-it...4/44'.041*. -1:.:-:•- ,,,. 4 0•-::_• I 4. e4 444,41* 4* :4_1-•: _• 4,A•la. A>.,44'041!' 4,./.;-: • *4k Nr• ly • 44.• 4. 4111,4r 4.--f; 4,•_-_-:-17:477 4.4 44** •, 40.---:.--- _______ . 4/.... ° :.:.• 4,0,4..-::-- -. 0. Lot...0 -a C.49 I 40.4.4•.41p/:::-, _-=-:- e • : • V.eilt.•:':./..:'..:::V-•:---:-:--- CI:..• 1313 , . ' ---- • C(,4 5 ht...*- 40. ka-ocolw ., • aottixeconcken 'Approve' , ..,4.11, re.. i•-•••:••••••;„4-4' •4,-- ...... . . Clean Water Services 4/' 4**4. It•••• ..7... 4%; - ... ..;+.4-1---41-Y- -/-umi , Fc.e._ tfjo(.ez,04,e14--rAd., ' le(-) 40P+4, ...,i4j4.4p•-.-... :-::.'e ••• ... .....,.:,......,. 4••••4r -________ ,..• .4... fr.:..-. .,....1, • ... ,..... ..-:..... •••• By PriAl *Date ' - , ca alit- . 4r.-404, :..•-.•:•:•.......:•••..••• •• ::::...............:.•/ . ..... -.., 4 0 te4 041,. .-...•.:•..•:•.•....•:-.::.•,•., 4*. 4/ • 41110111•1111~ . .4te::.:::.:%::::.:"•:...•...'..:.....:40141147, 4....:.........:::::.:::::..40. 4P* 1 • 3 p L Airi4+,,,,,,e4T .. v.. ...:.:.....:.::.:...:.:.:.:.:.:. ....:.:4•40...4-. ..:.y...::44,.... Aive • .# . ...........:.:.. , . .. -..., -.: ...-...,..- 4,4•*tin • • •_, d: • % 4 IP'.'.'.'...':'.--.':'Y.':':':':'. *# .11.•,',•,•.•,':'::.'V 7..' Cif-' 3 •447 . s ,,-1.• ......... * •.••••••••••••••••••••••;•-Ar. „.4640. "..•-•:•:...:....;,* ..„, a- *..,-. •#••,•• ,......... ....:,.. _ *,..*- .N.:.:. .41140.. .. .yr -, . ..u. 0**• • ••••••• 4,4, •4Ip rito• ...."...:::.:::::.:.:::";' • • '4° '.. ......# .407. , •4,• •`49 ..________. •••• .47 1 P 4°.,..::- ..:.:::.::::...:i . +to.* -..• '::::•:k '4P •4 00,0.- 44.4 I/* •$' •40.04.4 ....-:••::-•••..•:.:..A . •P.-,A ...-..:: :: .':'5.• St'lltir.i p/ 40400 . • ...c" 14, .4 0. • 4!....:::-:-:.:.:•..:•:-..,::, 4e40#,:::.:'::::.:."."...:.:_,4t , '74* 41,41. -a •4) id,at •*e ." al. . ..-:-:::•:•:•::.:•.•:•:•:.:•:'::: • -1 47, :::' :-:•:.::::::.....v * ' - 4, • . .I"• .,..,*.1:-:::.:::.:::.:.:•:.:v...'"? 7::-/"v::::;/41•14P#4.4. ,*...,/ LIMIT OF • 4,,,e ,..‘ 4, - • ": :4- Ar.......:: ••• ••.. 4 40/ 4i-4w ALLOWED V. "r. .4,1..:..:.:..::-:.:. :.:•::* :::.-....;-::: ,A,447....• „-144 -0.2 A... " , ' -,...:! ...0:•••:> '4,--=1,47.•40. -4'4,•,..4:, USE ___, *I IP v....41... •.•• •'•• -...:•:•.....:•:.:•.• •••••y.'.'.'.' 4' .40 V -LAI,.."t _41- „41, 41*•d•.... . ".: .... .... -401%. 'e 4r • 4174. 4...`...:. •:. -:.:.-:-:--....-..:-.. ..- 4140 4004.•• 4, 4. • • 4 • • 410'41,..,...::`:::::.:?:':.: :':::;':':':'::'::::':'-': ••••••# .111010• • ./119. OP' ........... .... &• • -410cTi':':'..::...:::::::::. ..... . .... , • ....7,4" '. 4* 41/4::-.-..-.:...:.y.:..,..::.y.:.:.-.....-......•..•'Ate. ," .•4,4*41•.:•::.•::..•.-:..%c:C :ETK•E R::"V.:.IN::E:-Q..-F..•....'•I.*:'::•':•:.:::.::,.--.4.••:.:.:0' ........ -•:...•'4,7:la>' .•r4 t[P4 0,./., •, g. \_ __- _ _ # t 1 - ___: - . :e • z i , :::•:•: :::-• : ) ,, el','I,:••I..:•:....•::..•.•...••.,.:••-,.•,...•....:,..:.':-.O*4P4,..44,4,.+40,,401...414..,.03ff0re*--a 4•4..4 0.4•,*0,-•.,i'.r_i-,•'.4I'6ain'*l-•vi loi.lE•l .r I‘'l••:,•*,-4.. '••.•",.„'a.4'''",,'`,I'\tk,-',rN4A''I4-'",-4,-r=',%' L U ''' ----_------ -, ... or .. / 4 0 -tyv 4lI ' s -_ _ TVF&R . / r STATION SO •4•.4, , t i , • . . ., -, = _ -:•.• •••• 4.,.. •A,../ 'n'IPAight '',...r -,1. -ripli . ' •- .-:p •qlr4V,I" .4' 'dills-:;:i.-t.nmilatlth :::: ,, ' .. '•'• ..., -zliqiiiED-41i";41ii; ' - „ . . '.• 40.4, 4 --.,,,,imii;1147P-.. 0 ' -.7,-.::::- 1 r ' .'.'iti.#•SA44 7 1 ' .4.......•A gteA. , -..___I- 111-11111 El 1111-WILILIIIIIILITh El III III III•II: 0 30 80 120 I - I S.W. WALNUT STREET - _ . SCALE.....:_.---._ FIGURE Site plan and vegetated corridor impacts ot Jack.. Park in Tigard, Oregon. Design 4889 provided by Laura Herbon, Landscape Architect, 2012, 7/26/1 2 PHS Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. 1 -MI YMUTOCAD\4600\4889 Jack Park\Plot Dwg§Ifig NRA.dwg,7/26/2012 2:09:59 PM � • • ...:: WETLAND AREA ►•'��< �`�� VEGETATED CORRIDOR AREAI ♦♦♦ y♦♦♦. 40 ® ENHANCEMENT AREA(24,736 SF!0.57 AC) / ♦♦ -' MITIGATION AREA(4,594 SF!0.I2AC) ♦♦♦ ♦♦ �„'n, • 4t4k.+• o. 40 re 3,517 SF/0.08 AC� *$L = \ ♦♦ VEGETATED CORRIDOR -= ♦ BOUNDARY ♦s„, • a (� x u• w* 2` usnwos,wirs ♦ •$. . _ �P \� I _; " v., 5:i7_ KRUEGER CREEK LARGE TREE •.. •♦�• `v ♦ \ CANOPY ♦ - ♦♦ 1 �I♦e1 a A \ \ +,I•+Alk 1!e �_ , ♦ ♦ ---_-- ♦�, I 4.eee♦ ♦• ♦1♦ ,, _--_- efr • TM UN agai 11111612a"luactarai TAX MGM C ova- Lae y Alb,•s* 40-A O 2.4c0-81- e4i1!.' +1♦1♦e♦1/1♦♦1i �♦♦ ••: • :i AT e a�° BY 19kJData , �s..e`i i�i`O�♦+!•,.... :'", .♦♦♦ 1'' ° `� ♦•1♦♦1��. G., ♦e♦♦e♦1♦�♦♦� ♦ .r ♦4 e'er ♦♦♦e1s _ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦e11� 3 OF_ 3 11♦e♦� ♦��::::C:?:;i i :: \a , F`.::.:� • •:£3'I }*Y('4 • *...:::::. ♦• ♦• BOUNDARY • ♦�♦ ♦ ". " , •e♦♦♦ ♦ij �.„ • VEGETATED CORRIDOR ♦#♦♦e♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦:::}::.::•::- :: Ie ♦♦♦6♦ • 11♦♦.♦♦1♦1i:::::•;:::: 'i ♦♦1♦�i�jl e♦♦j ' ' ♦ EAST OF KRUEGER CREEK ♦�♦♦e♦♦♦♦AT. .•♦♦ . :..." '.;;::. ::•.•. ::.:;" ...•., I�♦�1♦ �e11,..�-4TAL4`�low •♦ PREVIOUSLY ENHANCED ••♦♦♦♦1♦♦4 '4'';' ...-: • i:::}•i?''•:•i::.J. �.♦♦e*�♦♦♦♦eO��♦l♦♦♦�II•``e��♦ ♦ PER SPL 07-002492 .r"1♦♦♦e11♦je♦e1ee�?:::'i, `� ,:;;<2�::;:.::'.':::"::;'';.::::��►♦1�♦:♦�e��♦�q�`♦1:1:1±+1�y -■-■■-■-tom--- �_ ,.♦♦1♦�V.-�i:'."-• , :'.:.._ '♦♦♦♦e♦•'• 743 SF10.02 AC MITIGATION p�► 4r..:coNT6�uNIp.s :•.- '.' .-....7.4 ♦♦♦♦♦N/••4,4A Ij 4•4 ♦♦♦a i♦♦ . '4 44, 4/4.fie♦♦.4 4> ♦ ;� 334 SF,0.01 AC MITIGATION '1 a�♦fie♦11i ♦♦/ 7 - L♦.4, •4♦1,„1♦♦b4 e1 ti '.'.9e♦el ♦ i♦eU TvF&R % • 4♦eee♦♦♦•♦1♦♦♦411011 STATION 50 .• ♦♦••♦♦iie` -�L'—r 440***eee♦` II__,__ ! ''% -Ii 6 1 -..`..-_.__ -- - - 0 Oo 4a S.W. WALNUT STREET ` ALE IN Fe>,T FIGURE Proposed initigutiun and erinuncernenl al Jack Pork in Tigard, Oregon. 4383 REVISED 8/21/1= J PHS Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. ini Y:\AUTOCAO\4800\4859 Jack Park\Plot Dwgs\flg NRA,dwg,8/21/211121:50:56 PM • Appendix D. Arborist Report • • Appendix D D-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 Teragan & Associates, Inc. • Terrence P. Flanagan Arboricultural Consultants July 27,2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architect,LLC Laura Herbon 6824 SE 21st Avenue Portland, OR 97202 Project Title: Jack Park Tree Protection and Mitigation Plan Enclosed is the necessary certified arborist report to complete the Tree Protection and Mitigation Plan for Jack Park located Tigard,Oregon as required by the City of Tigard code. Summary Only three trees greater than 12 inches are to be removed for the project. An additional 14 trees that are greater than 6 inches but less than 12 inches are also to be removed. As less than 25%of the trees greater than 12 inches in the park will be removed,no replacement tree planting will be required as mitigation. The trees that are to be retained should be far enough away from the planned construction envelope that they should be able to be protected from any construction damage. The tree protection areas will have to be established prior to construction at a distance recommended under the Tree Inventory Chart or the direction of the project arborist. Assignment • The assignment that you requested I complete is to; 1. Complete a tree inventory,tree protection plan and tree mitigation plan for the expansion of Jack Park in Tigard,Oregon. Inventory to exclude trees located in the southeast corner of Tax Lot 04600 on the west side of the creek and the grove of trees on the northwest corner of Tax Lot 04501. Background The property that is Jack Park currently exists as a developed park over most of its area except for a portion of the property on the park's southwest corner. This corner is just west and north of the new Tualatin Valley Fire Station. Kreuger Creek flows through the property,generally from a southwest to northeast direction. This project is to build a trail and bridge to span the creek and associated wetlands to connect the two sections of the park to each other and prepare the grading for the approaches to the bridge from the south and the north. Report Use This report is to certify the trees that are on site,their condition and outline the tree protection steps to protect the trees to be retained on site during the development of the south end of the park. This report is also to address the required mitigation for the trees that are to be removed as well. This report is written to meet the requirements of the City of Tigard for a tree protection and mitigation plan. • 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 (503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,1 PN-0120 BMT Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Jack Park 8/8/2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architects Page 2 of 8 Observations • On December 1,2011 we completed the tree inventory. A chart of our findings is located in Appendix#3. This inventory lists the tree number,species (common name),tree DBH',tree condition,tree health,pertinent comments,tree recommendation,and the tree protection area required for retained trees. It also tallies all the trees that were inventoried that are larger than 12 inches diameter,the number of tree removals as well as the number of trees larger than12 inches in diameter. Tree Protection The tree protection fencing location is drawn on the plans for the project. The tree inventory includes a column that lists the ideal distance from the center of the tree on a radius that the tree protection should be located on the construction side of the trees. While the radius distance of the tree fence location drawn on the plan may be less than the ideal, where that occurs additional steps such as having the project arborist observe and document the impacts have been called for.The tree protection fencing shall be placed where ever it is expected that construction crews may attempt to enter under the drip line of a tree that is to be retained to use the area as a staging area,material storage area or any other use included repeated pedestrian traffic. Tree protection fencing will have to be erected on the east and west side of the area that is north of the proposed north end of the bridge where the assembly area for the bridge is to be located. The bridge is to be 110 feet long. Once it is assembled it is to be lifted by a crane up and over the trees to remain to be placed onto the two bridge supports on either side of the creek. No storage of any material,parking of extra vehicles for construction,parking of utility or office trailers and even the pedestrian traffic of construction workers should be allowed within the tree protection areas. Please refer to Appendix# 1 for additional steps in tree protection. The tree protection steps outlined under the this section of the report and in Appendix# 1 "Tree Protection • Steps"will adequately protect most of the trees during the construction as long as all construction is prevented from occurring within the tree protection areas. There are three trees that will have some impact to them due to the placement of the path and the fill for the approach to the bridge. Tree 54, a 41 inch diameter Douglas-fir will have fill come within ten feet of its base. While this is closer than desired,as it is only impacting less than 25%of the trees radial root system,the tree should be ok. It will be critical to not allow the fill to come any closer than ten feet. Tree 56,a 49 inch diameter Douglas-fir will have the path come within its drip line of branches.As the path is laid out,a grade cut will occur within ten feet of the tree's center,far too close for a tree of this size. A light pole to the west is preventing the path from being shifted to the west more that would assist in the avoiding the need to excavate into the rooting area of the tree. It may be possible to excavate for the path base eight inches below the existing grade but there may be some large roots from the tree that cannot be cut without jeopardizing the tree's long term health and stability. The project arborist shall be on site to observe the excavation for the base path to ensure that no large roots are cut or damaged. Some adjustment in the grade of the path may be ' DBH—Diameter at Breast Height,measured at 54 inches above surface grade. On trees with multiple leaders at 54 inches above ground level, the diameter is measured at the narrowest point of the trunk below 54 inches. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 • (503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMT Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Jack Park 8/8/2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architects Page 3 of 8 • possible during construction. The ability to move or remove the light pole to the west will give greater flexibility in placing the path further to the west,better protecting the tree. Tree 14,a 50 inch diameter Douglas-fir will have some light grubbing and minor grading occur 17 feet from the center of the tree. As long as the construction crews limited the approach to the tree to no closer than 17 feet and maintain a minor impact,the tree should be fine. Only one side of the tree will be impacted. If the tree protection areas have to be adjusted to be slightly less than the distance as indicated in the inventory or plan depending on the needed space for construction or lifting of the bridge,the project arborist shall be contacted to discuss and reset the tree protection areas with written approval from the Tigard's City arborist. ti Mitigation Plan Only the trees that were adjacent to the project site that might be impacted by construction were inventoried.A total of 60 trees were inventoried. Far more than that exists in the park. Three out of the 15 trees that are larger than 12 inches that were inventoried will be removed for this project. Given that only 3 trees that are larger than 12 inches in diameter are to be removed for the project,and far more than 12 trees exist in the park that are greater than 12 inches in diameter,that is less than 25%of the trees larger than 12 inches in diameter that are being removed for the project on the property. As less than 25%of the tree stems over 12 inches in diameter are being removed for the project,then no mitigation in the form of tree planting is required. Planting Within the Vegetative Corridor Non-native plants are to be removed utilizing hand labor and the area replanted with native plants within the Clean Water Services regulated wetland vegetative corridor. This will be done outside of the tree protection areas and shall only be done utilizing hand labor. Care shall be taken to insure that large diameter roots(greater than two inches diameter)of any trees near the grubbing areas or planting areas are not damaged.• Conclusion Only three trees greater than 12 inches diameter are to be removed to complete this project. An additional 14 trees are to be removed that are between 6 and 12 inches. As less than 25%of the trees greater than 12 inches diameter in the park are to be removed,there is no required tree replacement. Most of the trees on the edges of the construction areas should be adequately protected if the tree protection fencing is erected prior to the start of construction activity and maintain erect throughout the project. The excavation of the path west of tree 56 will have to be observed by the project arborist to be sure that no large diameter roots are cut or severely impacted. The fill one the west side of tree 54 will have to be carefully place to insure that it comes no closer than ten feet to the base of the tree. Certification of Performance I,Terrence P. Flanagan, Certify: That a representative of Teragan and Associates, Inc,has inspected the tree(s)and/or the property referred to in this report, and have the findings have been accurately stated. The extent of the evaluation and appraisal is stated in the attached report; • That Teragan and Associates, Inc.has no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report, and Teragan and Associates,Inc. has no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; • That the analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are our own and are based on current industry procedures and facts; • 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 (503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMT Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Jack Park 8/8/2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architects Page 4 of 8 • That Teragan and Associates,Inc.compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined • conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party, nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events; • That the analysis,opinions, and conclusions that were developed as part of this report have been prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices; • That a certified arborist has been utilized to oversee the gathering of data • 1 further certify that 1 am a member of the International Society of Arboriculture, and am a Board Certified Master Arborist Please call if you have any questions or concerns regarding this report. Sincerely, Terrence P. Flanagan ISA Board Certified Master Arborist, PN-0120,BMT PNW-ISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor,PN-0152 Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Enclosures: Appendix# 1 —Tree Protection Steps Appendix#2—Assumptions and Limiting Conditions • Appendix#3 -Inventory of Trees 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 • (503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMT Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Jack Park 8/8/2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architects Page 5 of 8 • Appendix#1 Tree Protection Steps It is critical that the following steps be taken to ensure that the trees that are to be retained are protected. Before Construction Begins 1. Notify all contractors of the trees protection procedures. For successful tree protection on a construction site, all contractors must know and understand tree protection. It can only take one mistake with a misplaced trench or other action to destroy the future of a tree. a. Hold a Tree Protection meeting with all contractors to fully explain goals of tree protection. b. Have all sub contractors sign memoranda's of understanding regarding the goals of tree protection. Memoranda to include penalty for violating tree protection plan. Penalty to equal appraised value of tree(s)within the violated tree protection zone per the current Trunk Formula Method as outline by the Council of Tree &Landscape Appraisers current edition of the Guide for Plant Appraisal. Penalty is to be paid to owner of the property. 2. Fencing a. Establish fencing around each tree or grove of trees to be retained. • b. The fencing is to be put in place before any construction activity occurs or the ground is cleared in order to protect the trees and the soil around the trees from any disturbance at all. It may be necessary to remove some trees prior to the erection of the tree protection fencing as the trees may impact the fence if removed after the fence is up. c. Fencing is to be placed at the edge of the root protection zone. Root protection zones are to be established by the project arborist based on the needs of the site and the tree to be protected. d. Fencing is to consist of 6-foot high steel fencing on concrete blocks or 6-foot high steel fencing secured to the ground with 8-foot metal posts to prevent it from being moved by contractors, sagging or falling down. e. Fencing is to remain in the position that is established by the project arborist and not to be moved without written permission from the project arborist until the end of the project. . 3. Signage a. All tree protection fencing should have signage as follows so that all contractors understand the purpose of the fencing: TREE PROTECTION ZONE DO NOT REMOVE OR ADJUST THE APPROVED LOCATION OF THIS TREE PROTECTION FENCING. . 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 (503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMT Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Jack Park 8/8/2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architects Page 6 of 8 Please contact the project arborist or owner if alterations to the approved • location of the tree protection fencing are necessary. Teragan&Associates, Inc 503-803-0017 terry@teragan.com b. Signage should be place as to be visible from all sides of a tree protection area and spaced every 75 feet. During Construction 1. Protection Guidelines Within the Root Protection Zone a. No traffic shall be allowed within the root protection zone. No vehicle, heavy equipment,or even repeated foot traffic. b. No storage of materials including but not limiting to soil,construction material, or waste from the site. i. Waste includes but is not limited to concrete wash out, gasoline, diesel,paint, cleaner,thinners, etc. c. Construction trailers are not to be parked/placed within the root protection zone without written clearance from project arborist. d. No vehicles shall be allowed to park within the root protection areas. e. No activity shall be allowed that will cause soil compaction within the root protection zone. • 2. The trees shall be protected from any cutting, skinning or breaking of branches,trunks or roots. 3. Any roots that are to be cut from existing trees that are to be retained,the project consulting arborist shall be notified to evaluate and oversee the proper cutting of roots with sharp cutting tools. Cut roots are to be immediately covered with soil or mulch to prevent them from drying out. 4. No grade change should be allowed within the root protection zone. 5. Any necessary deviation of the root protection zone shall be cleared by the project consulting arborist or project owner. 6. Provide water to trees during the summer months as necessary. Tree(s)that will have had root system(s)cut back will need supplemental water to overcome the loss of ability to absorb necessary moisture during the summer months. 7. Any necessary passage of utilities through the root protection zone shall be by means of tunneling under roots by hand digging or boring. After Construction 1. Carefully landscape in the area of the tree. Do not allow trenching within the root protection zone. Carefully plant new plants within the root protection zone. Avoid cutting the roots of the existing trees. 2. Do not plan for irrigation within the root protection zone of existing trees unless it is drip irrigation for a specific planting or cleared by the project arborist. 3. Provide for adequate drainage of the location around the retained trees. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 • (503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMT Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Jack Park 8/8/2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architects Page 7 of 8 • 4. Pruning of the trees, if necessary, should be completed as one of the last steps of the landscaping process before the final placement of trees, shrubs, ground covers, mulch or turf. 5. Provide for inspection and treatment of insect and disease populations that are capable of damaging the retained trees and plants. 6. Trees that are retained may need to be fertilized as called for by project arborist after final inspection. • • 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 (503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976.E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMT Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Jack Park 8/8/2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architects Page 8 of 8 Appendix#2 • Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed correct. The survey provided by Laura Herbon Landscape Architect,L.L.C. was the basis of the information provided in this report. The species identification and tree diameters were checked in the field by Teragan and Associates, Inc. 2. It is assumed that this property is not in violation of any codes, statutes, ordinances, or other governmental regulations. 3. The consultant is not responsible for information gathered from others involved in various activities pertaining to this project. Care has been taken to obtain information from reliable sources. 4. Loss or alteration of any part of this delivered report invalidates the entire report. 5. Drawings and information contained in this report may not be to scale and are intended to be used as display points of reference only. 6. The consultants' role is only to make recommendations inaction on the part of those receiving the report is not the responsibility of the consultant. 7. This report is to certify the trees that are on site,their condition, outlining the tree protection steps to protect the trees to be retained on site. This report is written to meet the requirements of the City of Tigard for tree protection on properties that are to be developed for residential or commercial use • 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 • (503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMT Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists NAME City , -rd ADP` # 3 • LOCATION lad( - , -, ... , , .,. . -.,-, DATE Dec 1,2011 .- — IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII NO COMMON NAME BOTANNICAL NAME DBH TREES CONDITIO STRUCTURE COMMENTS TREE TREE IDEAL TREE LARGER N REMOVAL REMOVAL PROTECTION THAN LARGER RADIUS ' 12 THAN 12" 1 Apple Maluspumila 14 1 Poor Poor Measured at 4'above ground. Topped. 1 1 2 Plum Prunussp. 7 Fair Fair 6 stems. 3,3,3,3,3,3. 1 3 • le Malus'umila 11 Good Poor 2 stems 9 6. To..ed. 1 4 Sycamore Maple Acerpseudop/atanus 36 1 Poor Fair 7"diameter limb cavity at 4'above ground on 1 1 W.side. 6"limb cavity at 6'above ground on N.side. 5"diameter limb cavity at 10'above ground on W.side. 9 Red Alder Alnus rubs —9 Good Good 6 14 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 50 1 Good Good 27 21 1 Red Alder Alnus rubra 11 Good Good 6 22 Red Alder Alms cobra 9 Good Good 6 23 { Red Alder Alnus rubra 9 Good Good 6 24 l Red Alder Arhus rubra 8 Poor Fair Located in stream bank on N.side. Root 6 25 Red Alder Alnus rubra 8 Good Good 6 26 Red Alder Aln us 8 Good Good 6 27 i Red Alder Alnus rubra 6 Good Good 1 28 Red Alder Alnus rubra 7 Good Good 1 29 Red Alder AMus rubra 7 Good Good 1 30 j Red Alder Alnus rubra 6 Good Good 1 31 Red Alder Alms rubra 5 Good Good Tree is less five inches and as such does not {_ have to be included in the tree tally 32 Red Alder Alnus rubra 7 Good Good 1 33 Willow Sadx 14 1 Ve Poor Fair 5"x 8"cavi from round on W.side. 8 34 a Willow 6 Fair Fair 6 35 Willow Salixsp. 7 Poor Poor Leans N. with corrected lean of about 75 6 _ degrees. Broken top with decay. 36 Willow Salksp. 8 Poor Poor Leans N. with corrected lean of about 75 6 d-•fees. 37 cRed Alder AMus rubra 8 Dead 111111111111 1 38 Red Alder Alnus rubra 7 Dead 1 39 Red Alder AMus rubra 8 Dead 1 40 Red Alder Alnus cobra 7 Dead 1 41 Red Alder Alnus rubra 8 _ Dead 2 stems 6,6. 1 42 Red Alder Alnus rubra 15 1 Poor Fair 3 stems 11,4,10. The 4"&10"stems are 1 1 43 1 Black Cottonwood Popu/us trichacarpa 7 Good Good 1 6 44 L Black Cottonwood Popu/us tdchacarpa 6 Good Good 6 45 Black Cottonwood Popu/us trichocarpa 8 Good Good 2 stems 6,5. 6 46 ; Black Cottonwood Populus trichocarpa 8 Good Good 6 47 Black Cottonwood Popu/us bichocarpa 5 Good Good 6 48 i English Hawthorn Crataegus/aevigata 27 1 Good Good 15 49 Common Hawthorn Crataegusmonogyna 12 1 Fair Fair 7 50 Common Hawthorn Crataegusmonogyna 6 Fair Fair 2 stems 5,3. 6 51 Common Hawthorn Crataegusmonogyna 14 1 Fair Fair 8 i 52 Common Hawthorn Gala egusmonogyna 8 Fair Fair 5 sterns 6,3,3,3,2. 6 53 Common Hawthorn Crataegusmonogyna 10 Fair Fair 3 stems 7,4,6. 1 54 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 41 1 Good Good 55 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesa 36 1 Good Good 22 56 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesli 49 1 Good Good 57 L Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesn 23 1 Good Good 27 58 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 31 1 Good Good 17 59 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menzlesl 21 1 Good Good 13 60 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 36 1 Good Good 20 I 15 17 3 • Appendix E. Deed Ft Encumbrances • • Appendix E E-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 ,/ 1 Washington County,Oregon 2�1 O-0��A , 02/22/201n 12.or49 PM `� D-DBS Cnt=1 Stn=21 RECORDSI S35.00$5.00$11.00$15.00-Total=$66.00 • AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: 1110111 lllllilUiiiill 11111 11111 01456445201000137940070078 I,Richard Hobemlcht,Director of Assessment and ..-, Jordan Schrader Ramis PC Taxation and Ex-Orticio County Clerk for Washington Count Oregon,do hereby ttni that the within S,�?x Two Centerpointe Dr Ste 600 v, g r N r{� ',t-4a Instrument of writing was received end recorded In the vlL -NN`: Y book of records of sold cou a-,,:_,,,-Lake Oswego OR 97035 i ��..�,: >•.` Richard HobemlcM,Director of Assessment and ate={y{ (50014 36792—CLK) Taxation,Ex•ORICIo County Clerk j UNTIL A CHANGE IS REQUESTED SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: City Manager City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard OR 97223 This space is reserved for recorder's use. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT DEED BARGAIN AND SALE DEED TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE,A Rural Fire Protection District,Grantor, conveys to CITY OF TIGARD,an Oregon municipal corporation, Grantee,the following • described real property: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein;the property conveyed is also depicted on the map attached as page 2 of Exhibit A and is designated thereon as the Adjustment Area. The Property currently owned by Grantor was previously conveyed to Grantor by Statutory Warranty Deed recorded June 30, 2006, as Washington County Recorder's Fee No. 2006-078348 (later re-recorded to reflect acceptance by Grantor). The Property currently owned by Grantee was previously conveyed to Grantee by Statutory Warranty Deed recorded August 4, 2006,as Washington County Recorder's Fee No. 2006-093079. The legal description of Grantor's Property following this conveyance is set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by reference. The legal description of Grantee's Property following this conveyance is set forth on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The true consideration for this conveyance is $238,250.00, plus land development costs and interest payable as set forth in the Intergovernmental Agreement between the parties, as amended, resulting in a total consideration of$400,042.71. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF Page I - LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT DEED BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 50014-36792 I74930 3.doc'KZ4:2R/20/0 • ANY,UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, • CHAPTER 424,OREGON LAWS 2007. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL,AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010,TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930,AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS,IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11,CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007. DATED this Oq day of � rj ,2010. TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE& RESCUE, J A Rur 1r F�tectio District Name: /4(40e , / Title: 1�47 C�t1ef-- Y ACCEPTED: • CITY OF TI an Oregon municipal corporation By: Name: Title: �� 0 Dated: 7w�Z , 2010 [Acknowledgments on Following Page] Page 2- LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT DEED BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 50014-36792 174930 3.docUKZ'1/2RQ010 • • STATE OF OREGON ) )ss. County of ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this a day of Ibriar ,2010,by as J..i' ij Mad C > of Tualatin ACa ley Fire&Rescue,A Rural Fire Protection District. u OFFICIAL SEAL gOlik Cairkg'ila) S DCAMAARIL O NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON NOTARY PUBLIC FOR ZE/14 COAIMISSION NO.�� 2 My Commission Expires: c I/ t�OI3' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of tpaswl ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on this -l84-day`of , 2010, by Cra3 &oss-er as l,iFc Hallo Aix- • of the City of Tigard,an Oregon municipal corporation. 0 A PUBLIC FOR OREGON y Commission Expires: 11'ttvUlt is; aoli OFFICIAL SEAL JENNIFER L DE GREGORIO --4 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON COMMISSION NO.415320 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 15,2011 Page 3- LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT DEED BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 50014d6792174930_3 210612KM/2R/20M 11111 • • • EXHIBIT A • LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE WALNUT F1RE STATION PROPERTY AREA TO BE ADDED TO CITY OF TIGARD JACK PARK V1 tract of land situated in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 4,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Hof the Willamette Meridian,City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,described as follows: • Beginning at the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 as recorded in Book 776 Page 707 of the Washington • County Deed Records; Thence S 48°47'07"W a distance of 367.98 feet; Thence S 01° 49' 10"W a distance of 173.41 feet to the northerly tight-of-way of SW Walnut Street 35.00 feet from center • line and point on a non-tangent curve to the right; Thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 785.00 feet,a central angle of 3°42' 53" (a chord which bears N 88° 51' 27"W,50.89 feet) and a length of 50.90 feet to the point of tangency; Thence N 87° 00'00"W along said northerly right-of-way,a distance of 142.07 feet; thence S 1° 51' 15"W a distance of 5.00 feet to a point which is' 30.00 feet from the centerline of SW Walnut Street; Thence N 87° 00'00"W,along said right-of-way,a distance of 4.93 feet to the east line of the plat of Bellwood as recorded in Book 27 Page.10 of the Washington County Subdivision Records; Thence N 1° 51' 00" E, along said east . line a distance of 99.97 feet; Thence N 44° 57 '49"E a distance of 452.86 to the north line of said Parcel 1; Thence S B6° 58' 53" E,along said northerly line,a distance of 157.13 feet to the Point of Beginning. • Containing 1.55 Acres more or less. • • Exhibit A • Page I of 2 0, . . '• I : •.. t ../ . ..., ----___........ ; { ....' .... ; U) ; C '',7 V /NJ •r. ,P , :. 1 ---f — . C...g- 0.1-e I < II 46 \\... ..1 ' WALNUT ST. • I ( . , - (7/ . i I1 411..h. 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 ! R I I I 4 1 H , , r . . .. 1 e I 1,4 1 R z — i Pdi 1 i - — L- 11 I It il iT I CAPITAL CONSTRIJOTION AND 1 TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUE FIGURE i TRANSPORTATION DIVISION .4., s ,-Orirsizs S.W. HALL BLVD.141 I ` TIGARD, OREGON 97223 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT .1.........___. : O/cE•50.3-639-4171 A V PAX. 503-524-0752 FILE NO ! ' TIGARD WISIV.71G412D-OR.GOV , Exhibit A Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT B • LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE WALNUT FIRE STATION PROPERTY A tract of land situated in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 4,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian,City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 as recorded in Book 776 Page 707 of the Washington CountyDeed Records;Thence S 48°47'07"W a distance of 367.98 feet;Thence S 01°49' 10"W a distance of 173.41 feet to the northerly right-of-way of SW Walnut Street 35.00 feet from center line and point on a non-tangent curve to the left;Thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 785.00 feet,a central angle of 19°48'25" (a chord which bears N 79°22'54" E,270.02 feet) and a length of 27137 feet;Thence S 1°50'55" W a distance of 5.40 feet to a point which is 30.00 feet from the center line of SW Walnut Street and point on a non-tangent curve to the left;Thence along said curve to the left with a radius of 790.00 feet,a central angle of 00°23'06" (a chord which bears N69°26'06" E,5.31 feet) and a length of 5.31 feet to the west line of the plat of the plat of Brookwayas recorded in Book 28 Page 1 of the Washington County Subdivision Records;Thence N 1°52'46" E,along said west line,a distance of 369.76 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 1.71 Acres more or less. • Exhibit B • Page 1 of 1 5OO14-3679I 176750 t-DUC1)KC/10/7/1009 • EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE WALNUT FIRE STATION PROPERTY A tract of land situated in the Northeast one-quarter of Section 4,Township 2 South,Range 1 West, of the Willamette Meridian,aatyof Tigard,Washington County,Oregon described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 as recorded in Book 776 Page 707 of the'Washington CountyDeed Records;Thence S 48°47'07"W a distance of 367.98 feet;Thence S 01°49' 10"W a distance of 173.41 feet to the northerly right-of-way of SW Walnut Street 35.00 feet from center line and point on a non-tangent curve to the right;Thence along said curve to the right with a radius of 785.00 feet,a central angle of 3°42'53" (a chord which bears N 88°52'29" W,50.89 feet)and a length of 50.90 feet to the point of tangency;Thence N 87°00'00" W along said northerly right-of- way,a distance of 142.07 feet;Thence S 1°51' 15" W a distance of 5.00 feet to a point which is 30.00 feet from the center line of SW Walnut Street;Thence N 87°00'00" W,along said right-of- way,a distance of 4.93 feet to the east line of the plat of Bellwood as recorded in Book 27 Page 10 of the Washington County Subdivision Records;Thence N 1°51'00" E,along said east line a distance of 436.89 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 10 Bellwood and the Southwest corner of Parcel 1 as recorded in Book 776 Page 707 of the Washington County Deed Records;Thence S 86°58' 53" E,along the south line of said Parcel 1, a distance of 466.70 feet to the point of beginning. • Containing 2.75 Acres more or less. Exhibit C• Page 1 of 1 5001436791176750-1.DIX:1JKIJ10!//1009 • • L./Ty OF TMgpn • 10407 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED J. W. BRAYSON BUILDER, INC. , an Oregon corporation, "Grantor," has bargained and sold, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, "Grantee," and its successors and assigns, all the following real property, with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, bounded and described as follows: PARCEL I: Tract "B," BELLWOOD. PARCEL II: A tract of land in Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 10, BELLWOOD, a duly recorded plat in Washington County, Oregon; thence south 87° 26 ' 00" east 309.57 feet along the southerly line of Tract B, said Plat of Bellwood; thence south 44° 32' 13" west 453.05 feet to the north- east corner of Lot 1, said Plat of Bellwood; thence north 1° 26' 40" east 336.88 feet along the easterly lines of Lots 9 and 10, said Plat of Bellwood, to the point of beginning. Said parcels of real property are conveyed to Grantee so long as Parcels I and II are used as a park. Grantor has a possibility of reverter, and the Grantee has a fee-simple determinable. The consideration for this transfer is nil. To have and to hold the above-described and granted premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. Executed pursuant to order of the board of directors this day of • c,y , 1970. J. W.. BRAYSON BUILD , INC. By , raj i President By' r: ":� STATE OF OREGON )ss. County of Multnomah ) f,orcr. , 1970 • Personally appeared J. W. BRAYSON and „ Lva::,: who, being each duly sworn, did say that the former is the BM( 776 6 PAGE 707 Page I - BARGAIN AND SALE DEED • •• 1.0407 • President and the latter is the Vice rr silent, of J. W. BRAYSON BUILDER, INC. , a corporation; that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corpora- tion; and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its board of directors; and each of them acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed. Before me: • Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires a,er ..tr., 1;13 • r�. v: Cr pR'' STATE OF OREGON ss County of Washington I, Roger Thomssen, Director of Records and Elections and Ex-Officio Recorder of Con- veyances for said county, do hereby certify that the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in book of records No of said County Witness my hand and seal affixed. ROGER THOMSSEN, Director of Records • a'� 'q 5i/1U/n7 eeputy INDEXED BrOl 776 PAGE 7Q8 • Page II - BARGAIN AND SALE DEED FORM No.Tll-0U AIM DEfa. - 5540 ___ w_P_ua.Ca_.._ro•n__.Ma.a•.- v..J KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That 57.....P.,...LOR EN2.,...GL1ar.diall...o.f._the...- Pers.on_and_Property_--of._ALFRED_BELL, , hereinafter called grantor, • for the consideration hereinafter stated,does hereby remise, release and quitclaim unto -. The City of Tigard I hereinafter called grantee,and unto grantee's heirs,successors and assigns all of the grantor's right, title and interest in that certain real property with the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any- :,j wise appertaining, situated in the County of. _Washington ,State of Oregon, described as follows,to-wit: Life estate of Alfred Bell, reserved in his deed to II Brayson and Griffin, a co-partnership consisting of James W- Brayson and Q. B. Griffin, recorded July 5, 1968, in Book 704, Page 251, Washington County Records, i', I, TOGETHER WITH that certain easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, given by Alfred Bell, a single man, to City of Tigard, a municipal corporation, recorded February 28, 1959, in Book 734, Page 550, Washington County Records. I • • To Have and to Hold the same unto the said grantee and grantee's heirs,successors and assigns forever. The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, stated in terms of dollars, is $ it ?c —........ CMo.vev.a.-the-aetaet-eoneideeal,.,.. .,e........ref-er ineladee-other t...,t...iy-oreefve--giverr-or-preaneed-whidt-ie- pert of the ceasideratfBPF{t &Aeafe•whteb)-0 j, the whole In construingthis deed the singular includes the lur J. the circumstances mayrequire.ng p equue. 1 Witness grantor's hand this 7 day of %d.r -' 197 "' -ri Fr Wfieel--- 1. II li STATE OF OREGON, County of Washington .) sac ,..., -.__,�' 7 19.7?_.-- .I, Personally appeared the above named J. P. LOHRENZ, Guardian o the ?drson'and Property of ALFRED BELL, and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be _hi$.- --..voluntary act and deed. in his re OFeLcuT.psR•Tsentative can_ acity. •,' ,' , II Before me: .. i,-t' 64 _2,_ tt 4... Ch¢.tT-v li ( ) ' Notary PLi>lic for Oregon 7�/ _.. My comatisison expires . .:.�... /9-1-.-;L,. _..-.- II NOTE—Th.Magna,belw..n the syrnhub 0,a no,applicably,should by d.gl.d.s«Chapin 4E2,Onto,Laws Ifir,a,=wooded by M.leer Spacial 1a skyn. 4 I i QUITCLAIM DEED 9 ‘2,4 J. P. LOHRENZ, Guardian • STATE OF OREGON Person and Property of �e¢r uv of Washington ss ALFRED- BELL r. f , , TO I, Roger Thomssen, Director of Records CITY OF TIGARD moN'T USE THIS and Elections and Ex-Officio Recorder of Con- veyances for said county, do hereby certify EORS RESERVED ECORD 00 N. that the within instrument of writing was L.aec IN eouN received and recorded in book of records TIES WHERE No. o._. . �. AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO USED.) of said County • Ohand x Witness my ROGER and seal oENe Director of °� � Records & Elections n. 4 03557 cs. - 7 wiz-c—r G- .+ r�'-p'e,eo, p Duty c r✓ Boi 863 Nig96 APR 25 144 FK12 Ai TRAcT �L' Liet.i..wooti SaD. ___ _ • 8F1.L C r �i (I, � r • iii Li if) / L ti li- ..,'""-___.„.........,.........../ s - , ( TRACT a' ri — - s.E.coR, r�4NCAi-II LIFE CSYAl€ �' ' I fAe e:Ek s" I. 1 1- 41,v.2 ,ITEM 0 7 4, f _ MF{j r - - _ • ANDERSON 8c DITTMAN APR i 31972 ATTORNEYS AT LAW TIGARD PROFESSIONAL CENTER 886E S. W. CENTER STREET CITY OF TIGARD P. O. BOX 23006,TIGARD. OREGON 07229 630-1121 FRED. A.ANDERSON DERRYCK H. DITTMAN MEMORANDUM TO Nick Hiebert, Acting Director of Public Works FROM Fred. A. Anderson SUBJECT : Release of Bell life estate DATE April 11, 1972 As you requested, I have obtained a court order releasing the life estate of Alfred Bell and I enclose a deed conforming thereto. There are certain personal belongings still on the premises which Mr. Lohrenz is responsible for as guardian of Alfred Bell, and . I have assured himthat there will be no difficulty in obtaining the removal thereof. The within deed should be forwarded for recording and if you desire that I do so , please let me know. r FAA/,j Enc. • r . sr - . : OREGON LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY • ' REV.SG; e r e C DITIONS AND.STIPULATIONS ' . a (Includes those American Land Tide Asw`ciaition-Owner's Policy—Odard Form B-1962) 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS 6. OPTION TO PAY.SETTLE OR COMPROMISE CLAIMS • The following arms when used in this policy mean: The Company shall have the option en pay or settle or compromise for or in (a) "land": the Land described.specifically or by reference. in Schedule A and the name of the Insured any claim insured against or to pay the full amount of shin policy,reor,in case gag is claimed under thiso policy by the owner of the ent esa improvements"public ieco lento which rd Law chnimpa zeal puctirey: prrd a aid a covered e u hpaslet', the Compvet et' shollo have the toption Inl said records": thou records which impart constructive notice of marten to purchase said indebtedness;,to suchn ellsc,costs. atto or tenderd of payment of the noting to said Land; full ompan of this iga et',together ride withall c hall terminaterney's all and e of the whichCoin. (a) "knowledge": actual knowledge,not constructive knowledge or notice which the Company s obligated a hereunder to pay.shall terminate all liability of the pang may be imputed to the Insured by reason of any public records: Pant'hereunder. In the event,after notice of claim has been given to he Company by the Insured, the Company offer to purchase said indebtedness. the owner of ld) "date": the effective date; such indebtedness shall transfer and assign mid indebtedness and the mortgage (e) mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust. trust deed, or other security inseru- securing the same to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. meet; and T. PAYMENT OF LOSS (I) "insured": the party or parties earned es Insured, and if the owner of the la) The liability of the Company under this policy shall in r10 case exceed. in indebtedness second by a moetgsge shown in Schedule B is named as an Insured all,the actual lose of the Insured and cost and attorneys fees which the Company in Schedule A,the Insured shall include (I) earls successor:n merest in ownership may be obligated hereunder to pay. of such indebtedness. 12)any such owner who acquires the esatr or interest referred (61 The Company will pay, :n addition to any lose insured against by this to in this policy by foreclosure, trustee's sale, or other legal manner in satisfaction policy. all costs imposed upon the Insured in litigation carried on by the Company of said indebtedness, and (11 any federal agency or instrumentality which is an for the Insured, and all cosh and attorney's free in litigation earned on by the insurer or guarantor under an insurance contract or guaranty insuring or guarantee- Insured :eh the written authorization of the Company in.said indebtedness, or any pars thereof. whether named as an Insured herein or (c) Na claim for damages shall arise or be maintainable under this policy III or c n , subject otherwise to the provisions hereof. if the Company, after having received m notice of an alleged defect, lien or encu - 2. BENEFITS AFTER ACQUISITION OF TITLE brance not excepted or excluded herein removes such defect lien or encumbrance a mortgage described in withinasonable tune after receipt of such notice. or (21 for liability voluntarily If an insured owner of the indebtedness secured by i assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suite without written consent of the Schedule 0 acquires said estate or interest, or any pan thereof, by foreclosure, Company. or 131 in the event the titlebecause is rejected as unmarketable of a u trtee' in sale, or other legal manner satisfaction of said indebtednessor any defect, hen en or encumbrance not excepted or in this policy. until then his part thereof,or if federal agency or of en insurance acquires said estate or interest. been final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction sustaining such or any part thereof,as a consequence of an insurance contract or guaranty insuring rej<edl r guaranteeing the indebtedness secured by a mortgage covered by this police or (all All payments under this policy.except payments made for coin,attorneys' any part thereof,this policy shall continue in force in favor of such Inured,agency fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro lento and no pay. or inurumentelitye subject to all of the conditions and uupulations hereof. went shall be made cystoid producing this policy for endonement of with payment 3. EXCLUSIONS FROM THE COVERAGE OF THIS POLICY less the policy be lost or destroyed:n whiwhichcase proof of such loss or destruction `Thispolicy does not insure r lost or damageby reason of the following) shall be furnished a the ortsfacnon of the Company: provided, however, if the against owner of an indebtedness secured by a mortgage shown in Schedule B is In- (a1 Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited aired herein then such payments shall not reduce pro canto the amount of the to building and coning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the insurance afforded hereunder as to such Insured, except to the extent xtent that such ea• pan, use or enjoyment of the land, regulating the character. dimensions, payments reduce the amount of the indebtedness secured by such mortgage Pay. or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on said land,or prohibitingmeet in Full by any person or voluntary sodsfactan orrelease by the Insured of e a separation inownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of any lot or mortgage covered by this policy shall terminate all liability of the Company to the Parcel of land. insured owner of the indebtednem secured by such mortgage, except u provided in (b) Governmental rights of police power or eminent domain unless nonce of paragraph 2 hereof. the eremite of such rights appears in the public records at the date hereof. le) When liability has been definitely fixed in accordance with the conditions of (c) Title to any property beyond the Goes f the land expressly deunbed i this policy the lass or damage shall be payable within thirty days thereafter. Schedule A, or title to streets. roads, avenues. lanes, way or waterways on which 8. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE such land abuts,or the right to maintain therein vaults,tunnels.ramps or any other It is expressly understood that the amount of this policy is reduced by any structure or improvement; or any rights or easements therein unless this policy amount the Company may pay under any policy insuriwg the validity or prioney of specifically provides that such property rights or easements are insured. except that any mortgage shown or referred to in Schedule B hereof or any mortgage hereafter if the Land abuts upon o t, t e physically open streets or highways this policy executed by the Insured which charge or lien an the estate d te or rest described insures the ordinary rights of abutting owners for acress to one of such streets or or referred to in Schedule A,and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to highways. unless otherwise excepted or excluded herein_ the Insured under this policy. The provisions of this paragraph numbered 8 shall (d) Defects, liens. encumbrances, adverse claims again.the title as insured or not apply to an Insured owner of an indebtedness secured by a mortgage shown other matters (11 created. suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Ineurd claiming in Schedule B unless such Insured acquires ride to said estate or interest in sans- loss or damage; or (2) known to the Insured Claimant either at the date of this faction of said indebtedness or any part thereof. policy or the date such Insured Claimant acquired an estate or interest insured 9. COINSURANCE AND APPORTIONMENT by this policy and not shown by the public records. unless disclosure thereof in (a) In the event that a partial loss-occurs after the Insured makes •( prate• rating b the Insuredshall have been made to de Com any Prior to the data of went subsequent to the due of this policy. and only :n that event, �in Insured Chia policy;; '31 resulting in no loss to the Insured Claimant; or (4) attaching becomes•coinsurer to the extent hereinafter cat forth. or created subsequent to the date hereof. If the cost of the improvement exceeds twenty per centum of the amount of this rch Loss aser or r damage for value not heut been sustained if the Insurd were policy. such proporund ly of any ' ceni loss established shall be borne by the e pis nc w r Company a one hundred twenty pal cenmm of the a of this policy bears to the sum of the amount of this policy and the amount eapended for the improve- (f) Usury or claims of usury, mess The foregoing provisions shall not apply to costa and enorneyi fees in. (g) ''Consumer credit protection,' "truth-in-lending,' or similar law, proceedings, the Company in prosecuting or saint tog for the defense of moors oo csts in behalf.of the Insured pursuant r top the termsgs, of this policy or to 4. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS— tots impost on the Insured m such actions or proceedings, and shall e face o if NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY THE INSURED to that portion of losses which aced in the aggregate ten Per<e« of the of h polity. (a) The Company.he. at its own coca and on undue shall provide ng r Process arisihoweng or. die foregoingecbrand coinsurance qd shall not Lich for the o againstga of the Insured in all litigstionse,aconning o of actions,ori injunction. proceedings to and on. ter date out of a Gen orencumbrance far a liquidated amount ed commented • the sureInsured,or or defenses,.odmmea de - ess ctions inter. usher onsthe loans of this policy and snot shown in Schedulets . h provided pod against • foreclosure to sale the mortgageaid and indebtedness vend by further. such coinsurance chloss, s, the he shall net apply ream last o. at the time os this polity appropriate a cab of esa eash a interestfh cast land. nt 12t ore eeli action not ec of su lost, the then value of the at is icy, tors may be e to hick litigationti the title of the estate or such or the lien of the not ) oneredhundred esc twenty per rred ofin the amounteA this Policy. mortgage a ed, which or action i any of such events is foundededm (nl If the laous described or record to in Schedule t isldivisible into separate one uponrsan alleged defect,is lienter encumbranceurintioninsured of l by eso policy,and may and no«on sod a loss is a or if coed affeousrns and such are not used as one pursue any litigation is final oina o in the court of last resort. single site, ands lost m end and off tin onemore of said parcels but not Ibl In case any such action or proceedingetot shall be begun, or defense inter all.the shall be computed and settled on pro rue bade a if the face amount posed, or in coat knowledge shall come to the Insured of any claim of title or of this policy was divided pro ran as to the value on the date of this policy of each interest which is dveree to the sate of the estate or interest or lien of the mortgage separate independent parcel to the whole, exclusive of any provemr made as insured, a which might cause loss or damage for which the Company shall or subsequent to the date of this policy.unless a liability or value has otherwisefi been may be liable by virtue of ibis policy, or if the Insured shall in good hid ton, agreed upon as to each such parcel by the Company and ththe e statement Insured at the time^n tract m sell the debtednesa secured by a mortgage covered by this policy, ter if the ,nuance of his rcy d .haven by epresa a herein by a an Insured inrood faith leases or contract*to sell, loose of mortgage the saint, er endorsement attached hereto. if the successful bidder at a foreclosure sole under a mortgage covered by this policy In. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT refuseseredto purchase and in any such event the title to raid estate or interestfin writing. re. Whenever the Company shall have settled a claim under this policy, all right jeered o cane shruble, he Insured shall notify the Company shot wriatsg. of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Insured, If such notice shall not be given to the shall Company within ten days of the receipt of and it shall b brvgated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the process or pleadings or ifi the Invert shall not, inwriting, promptly notify the Insured would have had against any person or property in respect to such claim Company of any defect, lien orencumbrance insured against which shall come to had this policy not been lowed. I the payment does not coon the live of the Iry the ge of the Insured,or i de Insured shall venting.promptly es 'fy cured,the Company shall be subrogead to such rights andremedies In the result from • Company of he such rejection by reason of u ed u attar abiliry of tide,then tier which said ppaaymedt been rode amount of said lest.If lau should rrsuln from all liability of to Company d to to subject matter of such action, pro. any act of de lancd, such act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in ceeding or matter shall cease and terminate;provided.however,that failure to noisily that event shall be required to pay only that pan of any losses insured against shall in no case prejudice the claim of any Insured unless the Company hall be of tundrr which shall need tea scalp if any; lost to the Company by reasone actually prejudiced by such failure and then only to the extent of such prejudice. of the impairment of the right of subrogation. The Insured. ifrequested by to Ic The Company shall have to right at its can coca to institute and necessary Company. shall transfer the Company all 14tta and remedies against any person any action or establish or do any other act which in its opinion may be necessa a or property necessary in order to perfect such right of subrogation,and shall permit or desirable to establish the risk of the rime or interest or de lien of the mortgage the Company to use the name of the Insured m any transaction or litigation involving as insured; and the Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of such rights or remedies. this policy whether or not it shall be liable thereunder and shall non thereby concede If the Insured is ha owner of the indebtedness tnurd by a mortgage covered liability or wove any provision of this pokey. by this policy, such Insured may release ormodify substitute the personal liability.or of any Id) Ine all Does here this policy permits or requires he Company to prosecute debtor or guarantor,or extend or t from:se modify the terms of payment. le release ee provide for the defense of any action or proceeding. the Insured*hall secure to s portion of the estate er interest the lien of he mortgage, or release any it the right to so prosecute or provide defense in such actin or the ine, and ollunal security for the indebtedness,the^eta, provided such act does not insult in any all appeals therein,and permit it to use,at:a option.the name of the Insured for loss of pnsetry of the lien of the mortgage. sac). purpose. Whenever requested by the Company the Insured shall give the II. POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT Company all reasonable cad in any suds action or proceeding, ineffecting settle- Any action or actions o rights of action that the Insured may have or may bring mint, securing evidence. obtaining witnesses, or prosecuting or defending such against the Company arising out of the status of the lien of the mortgage covered action or proceeding,and the Company shall reimburse the Insured for any expense by this policy or the title of the estate or interest insured herein must be based on so mOTIC the provisions of this condition • 3. NOTICE OF LOSS—LIMITATION OF ACTION No s or onnoatt of this policy can be waived r changed expo by writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto other tuned by the officer of thea V Company. In addition to the a for required underedparagraphthe e(b).a statement in writing the Secretary,Cand Assistant Secretary or validating officer of Company. of any loss or damage for which it is claimed the Company is liable under this 12. NOTICES, WHERE SENT policy shall be furnished to the Company within dory days after such loss or duals., nder All notices required to be given the Company and any statement h writing shall have been determined• d noright of action shall ace to the Insured under required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed no it at methe office itingh this policy until thirty days after such statement shall have been furnished, and no : d this policy. shall be had bythe Insured under his policyrove unless action shall be Dine po icy. trimmed thereon within five yeata after expiration of said thirty day period. Failure to furnish such statement of sou or damage,or to commence such action within the time here:nbefore specified, shall be a conclusive bar against maintenance by the Insured of any anion under this policy. TI 12 . • 0 0 F),h ""a'A ,.,4 : 1 I l 1. t i ',.- :± ' t ' 'C:- J I °., r- �}6�7- i,r> ^ . ?,. a v I I �, 1,.i��,�& „ I r m �I I e "," r ,AyY .I. Ira ' r4( ;•yya;k� . .]�,•:`,4"- • i w l ' rr ',: s wr�_,:'," "> ,-F yii v.girl ', ,,,,4 - yx.-aIA? i- �,` <,. „ -.E�i t „` b"�1 ' sat 4,ref l-4LII.➢II➢Q 71II LB EL lama III Et Ill 111/11_➢Q_➢a I.a.If•).., Nnj II III Siii u e I S uit I gisibeiI•I .iptan I S u S r't1 r n� ,a,z.ar, `f Ir`. \I �',,\,y r-J i; , �t P, , 1 , ' r .; .. slat L pltj 1 q J , I:i': •,,t4 S, flln•I .rll � � I 1 i Z,[-*.i-t, , f�t- l l,,, ',''} 1, �•�. IHi 1; d I•r , 'rr , AGENCY OFFICES IN: 'j�'`I r , r"`-is i 1 ti,: V I •"�'i I t. 1; � .?+G , ' cf a� ., tt�` T \ , T \y , �'t< CROOK COUNTY •;�t �O 1 '�� i." u 8., R I +,`-Central Oregon Title & Loan Co..,; fi)' i� + ).E�tiY . '1 / i it" t. I�cF 330 Beaver Street l..l,n ,.�? .. a r< -- (i r , , `}<' r{ C_ Ix'`• s`4 /1i Prineville, Oregon •� hM"� j� �' { ; I"h�‘i;u;, (t �� ` „ , / �•t i'i'�i, lt;t ,'. • .1,g ylii )' ' '` `' DESCHUTES COUNTY ` Y e�i ..ice i �f��'t r1 4 '� e-: '. s 4 Tate (� '"; 1`I`'°'p� , 4,''i 'E Deschutes Co. Title Insurance Co. ,lsk' + �' . t + 1030 Bond Street -CO , �j. �• , Ki. // '.. r 3 Rom, ,.- •,, Bend, Oregon r ti •~r/Vt`gyp` j i- �r} Cart•• f' ;',°'• ;r rE• >,: i).: {ii M� rt . y •el '�j, , r. Y� ,x a a- DOUGLAS COUNTY s,� 'r1,,.-mg rm �R Lti�,�; „ .,..I,,...,._,:. F Commercial Title Company 7� Ni e MAIN OFFICE 1" �''r r' r } v �. 563 S.E. Main Street s iit`" 415 S.W FOURTH AVENUE . : +" Roseburg, Oregon 9 • 4'y (Near WashingtonStreet) >s ri+f �{ 'r . i�:" 1L I,` it.�c6 • �j PORTLAND OREGON 97204 r 0 PHONE 222-3651 �o F PPteA, r JACKSON COUNTY a1}t1 4p t }. ril. C Crater Title Insurance Co. ti f • �$ :ri �. 604 West Main Street .u*j c,c,. -fir {. ' ::, '.' , .. Medford, Oregon ',� EAST SIDE OFFICE :'.€, "� I ^s. --_.._.- - . • .:2 • t5 � '>; C ' , p;3> JOSEPHINE COUNTY , ., 29 N.E. 122ND AVENUE nl,•;; a{., ' 15 .a Fh� Mi,ti``••, '03 Y • PORTLANQ OREGON 97230 J2 ° + t�luuttJJll�Y77 I'% - `i' "<� I F z - .e Josephine County Title Company t , 255.9103 >�', , - q 1 t: '" .ti 507 N.E. 6th Street it ', r�. I, I. .' i e.< OG� � ); {, ;i Grants Pass, Oregon q 4 1},� '• rt , rr KLAMATH COUNTY (� i4 < WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICE Pe h' � — �.J ,t I L: 1 ` jAa� 4'kr .t Klamath County Title Co. t.� �rr t 4` 12D12 S.W. Canyon Road f r > '� 422 Main Street �tFa Beavorton, Oregon 97005 , p ''i/ d'1101 > NI}i:t: 4 ) • I {h.� {, Klamath Falls, Oregon >.� tN;646_818) � Title Insurance �� ,,) .� - • > LANE COUNTY „,, ... . r„ y Company N I }}id, (It n tieda, < ,y t< Pioneer Title Co. of Lane County + CLACKAMAS COUNTY OFFICE `' s 818 Pearl Street 4r, � C ps 425 S.W. FOURTH AVENUE 'tx 1 r Eugene, Oregon +Y ,,'i., 112-11TH STREET 4 (Near Washinglcn Street) °� 4y+'' "j. `� x,� OREGON CITY, OREGON 97045 fFc,` , C• • 9 v • >} 4 rj , ` PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 , {` `- g WALLOWA COUNTY ,\j `'. 656.5243 i••,,;, q o �, 4 s • � 0) l al), w,i ?, rep. I)ti it 1 Wallowa Title Co. j Ij} • ,r 4 ¢� _. PHONE 222-3651 ,�;,f« s ,x 119 West Main Street o ) �� `- , �� k�i� i , Enterprise, Oregon as�,11 v S �. '1 7 ti'ls� • " "t e�r., tr l4t}: p�-°.yr „� a -"`-u u"+ 1.: .'.� (} ; y� yy'7 r , ry q ` < P,. X ;, ., . y+a ��11Y.. F,,# �`. "'W — r ate': ,rl „ tg "Y', " ap'r: `Nt _R-4a,' 'm _}l I i `..,;1 L 'iyl y +NI Y�A, `r 'iY . } , 'jr 9 I L.• it ,r a I Tate I • • 425 S.W. Fourth Avenue/ Portland, Oregon WASHINGTON COUNTY OFFICE Phone 222-3651 526 N.W. CANYON ROAD • BEAVERTON, OREGON TELEPHONE 646-8181 POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Oregon Land Title Association Standard Coverage Policy No. 317668 Premium $32.50 TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, (incorporated under the laws of the State of Oregon), here- inafter called the Company. for a valuable consideration paid for this policy of title insurance, the number, date, and amount of which are shown in Schedule A, does hereby insure the parties named as Insured in Schedule A, the heirs, devisees, personal representatives of such Insured,or if a corporation, its successors by dissolution, merger or consolidation, against direct loss or damage not exceeding the amount stared in Schedule A, together with costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may be obligated to pay as provided in the Conditions and Stipu- lations hereof, which the Insured shall sustain by reason of: 1. Title to the land described in Schedule A being vested, at the date hereof, otherwise than as herein stated; or 2. Unmarketability, at the date hereof, of the title to said land of any vestee named herein, unless such unmarkerability exists because of defects, liens, encumbrances, or other matters shown or referred to in Schedule B; or 3. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date hereof, not • shown or referred to in Schedule B,or excluded from coverage in the Conditions and Stipulations; or 4. Any defect in the execution of any mortgage or deed of trust shown in Schedule B securing an indebtedness,the owner of which is insured by this policy,but only insofar as such defect affects the lien or charge of such mortgage or deed of trust upon said land; or 5. Priority, at the date hereof aver any such mortgage or deed of trust, of any lien or encumbrance upon said land, except as shown in Schedule B such mortgage or deed of trust being shown in the order of its priority. all subject, however, to SCHEDULES A and B, and the CONDITIONS and STIPULATIONS herein, all of which ire hereby made a part of this policy. In witness whereof, TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed and authenticated by the facsimile signatures of its President and Secretary, provided this policy is valid only when countersigned by a duly authorized officer of the corporation. Countersigned =_JRANce IIIII TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY `�"•••. ...••'6%04, By j • ' Polka 1, •Iik) • edOfficer �r�4Yr A• • PAGE I OF POLICY /Ot •••,•••••••.,: Secretary REV.7-63 ell TI-21 1lt1111 a t1\l\\\io •``` SCHEDULE A • Amount $ 2,500.00 Date May 27, 1970 At 5:00 P.M. INSURED ---CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON--- The fee simple title to said land is, at the date hereof, vested in CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON.--- The land referred to in this policy is described as: PARCEL I: Tract "B" , BELLWOOD, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. • PARCEL II: A tract of land in Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 10, BELLWOOD, a duly recorded plat in Washington County, Oregon; thence South 87°26' 00" East 309.57 feet along the Southerly line of Tract "B" , said plat of BELLWOOD; thence South 44°32' 13" West 453.05 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 1, said plat of BELLWOOD; thence North 1°26'40" East 336.88 feet along the Easterly lines of Lots 9 and 10, said plat of BELLWOOD, to the point of beginning.-- PAGE 2 OF POLICY NO. 317668 TI 28 s• Oregon Land Title Association Standard Cos eeeee Policy R e-Go SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss by reason of the matters shown or referred to in this Schedule except to the extent that the owner of any mortgage or deed of trust is expressly insured in Paragraphs numbered 4 and 5 on page 1 of this policy. 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; pending pro- ceedings for vacating, opening or changing of streets or highways preceding entry of the ordinance or order therefor. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records hut which could he ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records; unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 5. 1969-70 taxes, $43.31, plus interest, unpaid. (2S1 4AD 4501 23-8) AFFECTS PARCEL II 6. Tigard City Liens, if any. , 7 . Easement , including the terms and provisions thereof granted to Portland General Electric Company, dated October 30, 1952, re- corded December 31, 1952, in Book 340, Page 145, Washington County Records. (AFFECTS PARCEL I and OTHER PROPERTY ALSO) 8. Easement disclosed by deed to Brayson and Griffin, a co-part- nership consisting of James W. Braysonand Q. B. Griffin, recorded July 5, 1968, in Book 704, Page 248, Washington County Records, to-wit: "Together with a non-exclusive easement to right of way and easement for road access and utility purposes over the following described tract of land, to-wit: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washing- ton County, Oregon; running thence North along the Section line, 206.7 feet; thence West at right angles to the section line, 50 feet; thence South parallel to said section line, 400 feet; thence East at right angles to the section line , 50 feet; thence North along the section line 193.3 feet to the place of beginning." (AFFECTS PARCEL I) 9. Life estate of Alfred Bell, reserved in his deed to Brayson and Griffin, a co-partnership consisting of James W. Brayson and Q. B. Griffin , recorded July 5 , 1968, in Book 704, Page 251, Wash- ington County Records. (AFFECTS PARCEL I AND OTHER PROPERTY ALSO) 41111 ---CONTINUED--- Page3 of Policy No. 317668 TI-30 411 ---SCHEDULE "B" CONTINUED--- 10. Mortgage, including the terms and provisions thereof, given by Brayson and Griffin, a co-partnership consisting of James W. Brayson and Q. B. Griffin, to Morgan Pacific Co. , a division of First National Bank of Oregon, dated May 16, 1968, recorded July 3, 1968, in Book 704, Page 141, re-recorded July 8, 1968, in Book 704, Page 363 , Washington County Records, to secure the payment of $180,000.00. (AFFECTS PARCEL I AND OTHER PROPERTY ALSO) 11. Right of Way Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to City of Tigard, dated September 16, 1968, recorded February 28, 1969, in Book 734, Page 562, Washington County Records, for sewer. (AFFECTS PARCEL II) 12. Restrictive Covenant regarding underground wiring, executed by J. W. Brayson Builder, Inc. , recorded June 4, 1969, in Book 745, Page 523, Washington County Records, reference to which is hereby made. (AFFECTS PARCEL I) 13. Easements shown on the plat: "All side and rear lot lines to have a five foot utility easement." (AFFECTS PARCEL I) 14. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, given by Alfred Bell, a single man, to City of Tigard, a municipal corporation, recorded February 28, 1969, in Book 734, Page 550, Washington County Records. (AFFECTS PARCEL I) 15. Condition contained in deed from J. W. Brayson Builder, Inc. , to City of Tigard, Oregon, recorded April 14, 1970, in Book 776, Page 707, Washington County Records, which recites: "Said parcels of real property are conveyed to Grantee so long as Parcels I and II are used as a park. Grantor has a possibility of reverter, and the Grantee has a fee-simple determinable."--- Page 4 of Policy No. 317668 • \ / i i \"E 2 08.37 3337 4 5 :7' 26 00 E .. „,.. "'.. .,.....:,: 466.87 . 4 c 4,yb ,"b i ti°500 4500 / a.s,Ao. vs is 10 /r •4 84.92 S 83°3747 E !' 600 ° / 9 .. 'lb j el, O 0, 4 N r o /e O '—'ti ' z i :iO4 • 75.OD ' 0 1400 • r 7703 93s -2___, 'r, va Afb NE STREET0 9 A=sz -. -. . � T 20 94.2 ._ _ _ N89° 22'E 266.2 _-- 90 1 • 9 4000 4400 3800 03900 32Ac C .39Ac. 4. 22 A 334c 0 0 : N SEE MAP N 2S I 38 0 0 95 90 re) 4100 2 92.'c, - v 20 .. e4 2 b W W N O N a ° o O 4200 I07 42Ac. 3 I I.'_ — 000 '47 w •`� 1 100�a)4°W •N N77y7;U . z •N77°BC °^ ri 'e 94 to O 74 yy °n " ry O O"W I 97 32.29 f 0 o ° 1800 °pO W •o W. 62 h . e627'72E 4eS4S E 666 3 _0 , 60 o-^ _ O o° a 4300 � ,a7y.a °n'. F 7 1 E • Ne7°SOyl2s"w •z� 67 ^; 2100 8 23 a 9 a' h ,, q.00MNlXWA7 9.99 ' •'• N 7 99.89 7 l N 4000 F' N JO ft1.1 . b' 110.00 • 47 3 W .1 I _� 2 l00 00 •p ro r0 78? p „ 1000 ..u. 1900 W aO°p CO t 59 6B ry a2000 • `o ,. J� 2 • i(� J rV m .-I F� dy • m\ Nt°o a6- E JN,p,v/ ys� ; a 69 8 22 '' ^ •;1 co CD o �l m F ' 900 °° 7 �• � 500 N. • 'oa00 26 w n v 14 58 ° 7° , CV ^ 450J '; � `10901 G, •• 4 • N7 O •�, ` p ^ N Cl • �1 .G O "� 1�r _ p nn__ 9 N`\ • °.• 800 z • CO, I W \ 0 •1 -- 'A,, 1 U 1-' vi , a5•' SIO .. RT 21 ., ti 4 -1 ^— a) 'd' "M 1�''./ t --°pb 03 5. 14 1 57 p <, 700 •.7• 85 00 1 ...,. 0N ',.a eit _N 4 600 ~ 10. . ,?, . M� F ® C N i- S Pry " = 00 00 :p ^ NT7°17,Ow� \, 4, 455 8 31, gl, ., .0 & 4 70 0 YO • 03 00 P 56 N • 1 O0 •91.g/ ■o o' `� °Ip O0 5007j�7 40 W ' W 20 0 .4, h L'Jp N 4600 :• _ n `25 + °^ 400 4.6 Oa 0t RI^ N 774a7•• W f • es• zN 4800 v •to 00 ,1 O• ^ . . 3°. °5 .z 53 CO 19 ,/ 130.00 N8242,09.,W, s r,• '' 300 4� /°J • �n °, ^o • ^s gyn .r ° O 20 0 'J' N O 4f •• ' - - f a .,p J �° T� 5 2 ` '32 W b 4r _!i N 76° A r� 5i a, VVV\\ O. 9 • • fc J 63 4900 o • e 6a N 29 e3.y3 �i g3 0 - TRACT 8 p 3' • 18 pN Se7°2840 E N 87°46'54'W ' Se 96p8°02'°"E l60. p N ' •.T 7o 5 1 60'pO 5 0 00 "s'y, Dza 5200 .05100 4 m r. 17 0 1 15 � ^ 16 °:m 0 % Z ° £ ,0 0, 2 . C `0 0 N tO m 00.0o N 88°ce 4o„W ia00 1 37 90 70.00 307 9• 100 '0O S 84°45'27" V Z N 88°02'40"W 75.00 E 20B.37 _ .r rEE MAP 25 1 4A0 { T / • p� r9y. o n • I I� T �14)0 Otte insurance 12012 S.W. Canyon Road/Beaverton, Oregon 97005 escrows Phone 646-8181 HEAD OFFICE 425 5.W. FOURTH AVENUE PHONE 222.3651 City of Tigard Order No. 317668 P. 0. Box 23557 June 12, 1970 Tigard, Oregon 97223 Attention: Mr. John Hagman Gentlemen: We are prepared to issue Owner 's Title Insurance Policy covering: See EXHIBIT "A" attached; showing title on May 27, 1970 at 5:00 P.M. , vested in: CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON, an estate in fee simple; subject to the usual printed exceptions, and 1. 1969-70 taxes, $43.31 plus interest unpaid. (2S1 4AD 4501 23-8; • AFFECTS PARCEL II) NOTE: 1969-70 taxes paid before plat was filed. (2S1 4AA 4600 23-46; AFFECTS PARCEL I) 2. Tigard City Liens, if any. (,77-A-,szs 3. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to Portland General Electric Company, dated October 30, 1952, recorded December 31, 1952, in Book 340, page 145, Washington County Records. (AFFECTS PARCEL I AND OTHER PROPERTY ALSO) 4. Easement disclosed by deed to Brayson and Griffin, a co-partnership consisting of James W. Brayson and Q. B. Griffin, recorded July 5, 1968, in Book 704, page 248, Washington County Records, to-wit: "Together with a non-exclusive easement to right of way and ease- ment for road access and utility purposes over the following described tract of land, to-wit: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon; running thence North along the section line, 206.7 feet; thence West at right angles to the section line, 50 feet; thence South parallel to said section line, 400 feet; thence East at right angles to the section line, 50 feet; thence North along the section line 193.3 feet to the place of beginning. " (AFFECTS PARCEL I) (^7,4CNi)5. Life estate of Alfred Bell, reserved in his deed to Brayson and • Griffin, a co-partnership consisting of James W. Brayson and Q. B. 41111. City of Tigard---2 Order No. 317668 Griffin, recorded July 5, 1968, in Book 704, page 251, Washington County Records. (AFFECTS PARCEL I AND OTHER PROPERTY ALSO) 6. Mortgage, including the terms and provisions thereof, given by Brayson and Griffin, a co-partnership consisting of James W. Brayson and Q. B. Griffin, to Morgan Pacific Co., a division of First National Bank of Oregon, dated May 16, 1968, recorded July 3, 1968, in Book 704, page 141, re-recorded July 8, 1968, in Book 704, page 363, Washington County Records, to secure the payment of $180,000.00. (AFFECTS PARCEL I AND OTHER PROPERTY ALSO) (,,,.,,i LJ ) 7. Right of Way Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, granted to City of Tigard, dated September 16, 1968, recorded February 28, 1969, in Book 734, page 562, Washington County Records, for sewer. (AFFECTS PARCEL II) Aowia)8. Restrictive Covenant regarding underground wiring, executed by J. W. Brayson Builder, Inc. , recorded June 4, 1969, in Book 745, page 523, Washington County Records, reference to which is hereby made. (AFFECTS PARCEL I) ..rwNllEth 9. Easements shown on the plat: "All side and rear lot lines to have a five foot utility easement." (AFFECTS PARCEL I) (Arovma) 10. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, given by Alfred Bell, a single man, to City of Tigard, a municipal corpora- tion, recorded February 28, 1969, in Book 734, page 550, Washington County Records. (AFFECTS PARCEL I) 11. Condition contained in deed from J. W. Brayson Builder, Inc. to City of Tigard, Oregon, recorded April 14, 1970, in Book 776, page 707, Washington County Records, which recites: "Said parcels of real property are conveyed to Grantee so long as Parcels I and II are used as a park. Grantor has a possibility of reverter, and the Grantee has a fee-simple determinable. " TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Washington County Branch r r, --__ William H. Dunn WHD/1c • Order No. 317658 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL I: Tract "B" , BELLWOOD, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, Oregon. PARCEL II: A tract of land in Section 4, Township 2 Souty, Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 10, BELLWOOD, a duly recorded plat in Washington County, Oregon; thence South 87°26'00" East 309. 57 feet along the Southerly line of Tract "B", said plat of BELLWOOD; thence South 44°32 ' 13" West 453.05 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 1, said plat of Bellwood; thence North 1°26'40" East 336.88 feet along the Easterly lines of Lots 9 and 10, said plat of Bellwood, to the point of beginning. .14 r111 n NT7°293 d A8.so ve7,2455E •^ n 1pJ 13 .1• 70 : ,. 0.. �.•.00 TSOXr4 aE.��o61 SC.Op a: 1200/7 • w •.p n°1?00 $' o0 op 0 Ilk '1 420C n W q i00 0... 3��0 c . 3800 ^ 3?pi) { W o i o . ` 15• Q J O 2200 O m N p i i 61 ^ so •+ 66 o°N 24 00 ?5 c N til Z7 0 28 0CC 29 w 0 Q N O 1 O m �� '20.00 n. .�. I 71 n n NTT T �,ro 0p.00 ¢ ^ • i E nl x z 0 o t' I IOO W O ry O NTT�7 ip"W • ! NT7°e a D • 9 s z `i 94 `4 33 C 74 33 a 0 O O 1800 1000, "' 4 O w r.. • • F2 {5 • �Xle°t+22'E�N sae pi 46'E {tl 65 w_� 60 _ 67 21Q0 v n 4300 °'1229NBF r',z t NBPSS'25"w ' n p 0 w • 110�11 a \// A p ° m 23 •'I 10001wUfWAY 9.99 • ^U yg 70 '° �' m 4',:,..",, 110.00 Q �' NT '/T J9 w .1 Ip0�� ^ r 4 Io,0p 400.: 1000 w 1900 w . ,• 59 0 68 r 2000 • 4400 9 ro m 22 ' e. A . 1,0. 2 E. 9� ° ry 69 O • • 900 ops �! sop ]• a oo� 26 58 09 y16 i, S� N 77@7'a r .\ N r 4 SOC ^ N �. h;°•� , C0 RT a zI o o /`/ oa 57 0� 700 • 74 85 00 . .r o• 0o q ' ' s` t. ry w .: 600 ^/lo' ' zwi`a.° 40 " ' S5 8 op oo ")T°o ° tn ° 4700 Sp w - 791 9r 56 _ IOS to. L 8 4.91.2E ;. • O, ti 00 0 • 4°„op 500TT°a lap w • ,. 20 0 L zi ,. 7 e • 46G0 �. 54 o N i y°F4 Pry ' O •- lOO.0p ._ O ^ 4 °4 400NB02J:pi ry NTT°{7apW 7 i' 3 ^ 4800 ' .II ., p0 25' 2 A , i • 0 • ' o a °0,?o' !''g°•a. , 53 [r) w 19 ° i 0 o N erze'p3..w s ya''' s 300 'b°'*J • �' o. f'Y"„a Y%.'w i,:,i G<, 60.19 r !d 'E J, '0 . �: 0 200 s " J �, N �O h ` 10p v ag • > - 51 a � r7►Vi Oaw w °'� f C7 0 4900 n 20• • 0. :0O O W ��:i.::'y;a:•.hut. 91 64 I• e3 33 93"O 18 se.°2e 40 E 'k N 87946.54'w N aq�• sae°pz'/o"E �6y o°N TRACT 8 CO 9 a cA - o N ' ? • H1d 40 bT 2 • 60.0o SOOO C- 1' 70.51 9 � Yi '20 5200 ' al 5100 s �� W N� • " .7 Q �a 17 fT10 i • 15 N 16" °..e o a 0 O c W o 137.90 70 00 z 10O •5.00 Sda°a5.27"E 20 N ea°02'40 W 75.00 - 8.37 ° SEE MAP 2S 1 4 AD . , . _ . . • • , ......„ . \ / • E 2 08.37 I \ 3.137 ,...., ....1 '4 �. .....: :n:. . •O E 466.97 <i• / ti°500 4 500 / a m 4.6 i AG. a O 0 ul ?ARCE L / D. Y 'p 2 • Y • 84 92 5 8343747 E ' 600 9 /0 •'..> W s.�s o.,s fr. • 4 i ' L / �`� 0 .�/ _ / 1 11.04 75 CO 0 1400 • • n y .A I ° O t . I 6¢(' ° I Z 9 STREET �,a�E "�69° 22E 26 6 I 20 84.2 .2 9S 90 t. 3800 3900 4000 c, 4.399AAc. i 4 22 Ac. 33Ac. 324c. Q 0 0 Q r . r O p g • SEE MAP / OJ 0 n. iv2S I 36 0 95 90to 4100 (:)1/ 2.924c. " Y 20 84.2 r e N a N • c o 4200 I ° inA2Ac. �� } 1',y x^ _ .. '� S.'� A ✓ v ^. ' .�czc'.�, iY t , •t _ .t ,t� i °.;JY } r .s } x r<. a„i 4 eY .;.. 9 `.- rr ,}Y ; - -sue ; i','1 4. 1 t' = ix fly *,, * ,*,-..k-W .-',.:'' ..�a.a 4 L ei'- .. gF{` ■F ` _1 .S._ . ... yFe � 44., ' '�h . ; i f ' 1 f 'i jtrJ` i6($]S{;it itt 8f! .. , ti } Gie' ,i. �I `os jy f ' I‘4•4 i iI1 i i * 1 i tni ■($r � ^■IN C•8 Jr jj� _F1 J x ;,. 1 ' .. F' z f + e i■!"r i� Li►C 1M1 `■G r S ' ,._J 1 T ,y'q,. 3 4 ,. CCC F S r , ` 1 I1p .aY * -.. r:,' .�, - P fiuiiii!J!11 - - a'p if y{ L ' +� Y EErg`tiFE r it ,.. ". ' ' t ' � � • ' �' ' ' V �b ` • •• I:! ¢' 8,1 lilt! C 6 _ ` ti 414 it 1 " S , aw'trrlibawr� •' .. t •ih;� --„if..,"1 t '� `- Y 2 ,1 ,F }y k g t St. •'•`.♦ 1..76• '.•l a .1'f'.Kc -.i44 1 i�� ..r •y"�} • k 1 4,4`F"4—' A .p,g. er. • ,.• l+••• •V 4�, "1,� y "' ,43 't, r vy, R �C ..s 3F4s` . 5 4 J a x 3 .. - r Asa t l • t IA Mt' . -.> V •R'A'l11 4 t.'ally"4 a � ' rt :-row < n v� a.1! yl •"g - r'! ' rfia r t Sr .'f!r -. i. r1 / ems wswu w err O _7_4l*4Jd °.___--_- d.�+.r►�' •.I ` _ '�.-lt.... _ pa�.g.Yid rr Oa •,g:3a.._... . ...._ ._ _ row <+t1 r mil w.•r .. ' w! y Me.fw.sue a.lr.�f'H!.•�.._� _to am knows Os b•Os • tt,��yy y.yr,ly row it•Pr•N.w Not , ;,- NA atkord•Apoi la so Nat ' 4. tlf�..l.4 Iron*a WIw small..srt•rld.••l wow°.s•r•r I."tow row Dr II Ikaw. fr m.t.tm.. yy . /2-. C — rIr nnew I., . •. : G .: Now • • =toTA. • - �.. 3 / �,M, AT,,,Q...I s k.t o r. •ILCn FRR RFCt1i:0 wA 6 ! « ` . + pEPIRy 1..li.,txt, ,r.. ; ow: '' T 641 J + •^— , ^ J' t • _� n aor. c►otu n sTa rt• den d __. .,tf.. .Ira ova Ma ea N•. si fowl.•Mebvl P•W'• y• I. 1 .. t o.wow._.. ar.r.. - .. g },t "k re: l� '3 j I..wl for add C7.slr.n/9ut.fa••••fr•.7"*•l tyy ,„'44 Y ter Iit . i �t f-- py y, }}.14 row S G ) ,- .lt 1 how$. { .^:ltik r �[. ; f f :.Y � a `� , - ' bar � ,�y^v« �t � -e ..I�'k oi j y.�'�] a [,tdr* y . , r j(.Y ( • a l tow. `� i �''`2F ... Q •e''# s ,emu '"f� +q` s" 'yk ' • v, •9 J . t r P,.Y r 4 ♦ xt.n '�7+ r Sk 4 , ' er ,i• t t 1 , R ' x - 'alf ;.*6' � Nt az :. , xs W P 4" S • " . R a<nY.'( CA M ,! 1p i� r 7th ' '1 , ' I s i IN, ... �' i • J • r . a, , ^ H `��' § -' .'6 w 4 k w`.♦Y !yy _.S' A..e, rf„^` d Y�• 1 ,:5x ,�, ' ,Ati �; . � row e ti _ 4. 44+ " ..;.(y �"''n'w '7J' # Row d �. mr is s a d s a ��#.�'�p's r �r�,"� �a�,�'�td' ' Fprr�R ,N �� v` ♦u �� a44^^h • sow. ic ^A y; 4 'f, ' ta,4 ey �' ' y �' •fs fT �I•YqT J sow{ 4a P i'u 'k tow sec V. y �� . - r • t•� F,ti4 f �' 'fit I.q ,r.�'!I - 'a +. i .,,'%tow - I/ / ^ ITEM yr S f MO . i J KNOW ALL HETI BY TIIrSE Pi:i;3;itfS, That AI.FI:1.D BELL, a single man, hereinafter called gr.1.ntor, in consi.deratiou of Twelve R • Thousand One Hundred Twenty--Four and 72/100ths ($12,124.72) Dollars U to grantor paid, the receipt whereof hereby is acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, ::ell and convey unto GRAY :O Aro GRIFFIN, a w co-partnership consistingof Jccs W. Brayson and Q.R. Griffin, here-- 2 inafter called grantee, and unto grantee 's heirs, successors and C assigns all of that certain real property with the tenements, hered- N itanents and appurtenances thercunto belonging, or in anywise a < pertaining, si.tuntcd in the County of Washington, State of Oregon, described as follows, to-wit: TRACT I: Beginning at a point marking the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast I quarterof Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 1 o West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, 1 Oregon; running thence North along the section line 206.7 feet; thence West parallel to the North line t of said Section 4 a distance of 660 feet; thence '`} South parallel to the East line of said Section 4 c'n a distance of 400 feet; thence East parallel to the North line of said Section 4 a distance of 660 feet; to the East line of said Section 4; thence i1 North 193.3 feet to the place of beginning. TOGETHER WITH an easement for road and access purposes across the following described tract of land, to-wit: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 2 South, flange 1 West of the Willamette Meridian, Washington County, Oregon, running thence North along the Section line 25 feet; thence East 75 • feet; thence South parallel to the Section line be • - . tween Sections 3 and 4 to the centerline of Millers Ferry Road; thence Wear along the centerline of said • . road to the East line of said Section 4; thence North yv. along the section line to the place of beginning. 3G ,— ----�-�— EXCEPTING AND RESERVING TO ALFRED BELL the le • �P possession and use, together with the rents, issues G7 and profits therefrom, for and during his lifetime • that portion of TRACT I described as follows: Beginning at a point marking the Southeast corner ! { of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, W.M. Wash- i - ington County, Oregon thence West parallel tb the North line of said Section 4, 466.7 feet to a point; thence South parallel to the East line of said Section 4 193.3 feet to the Northwest corner of the Vernon L. Trigg • properly; thence East parallel to the North line of • said Section 4 and along the North line of said Trigg . f property 466.7 feet to the East line of said Section • 4; thence North along the East line of said Section 4, 6.N., 19313 feet to the point of beginning; v%5�� _ /` TOGETHER WITH en easetent for road and access v purposes across the following described lands: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4, Township 2 South, Range 1 West, W.M. , Washington County, Oregon, thence East . \ • Roy, 704 r„ 251 . - l 1 ` V„0 75 feet; thence South parallel to the section line between Section: 3 and 4 to the centerline of Millers Ferry Road; thence West alone the centerline of said road to the East line of said Section 4; thence North along the -East lima of Section 4 to the point of be- gi_nning./ —r%'"- The reservation of a life estate shall be per- ' sonal to ALFRED BIN? an^ shall continue throu'eh his lifetime, to terminate upon his death. Grace D. Gauldstone,executrix of the estate of Erwin T. Wills ,joins herein to release any claim of the estate of Erwin T. Wills with respect to the above described premises and hereby cenfir::'; the specific devise of the above described premises to granter, Alfred Bell, pursuant to the Will. of Erwin T. Wills. The true and actual consideration for this transfer is ` the sum of. $12 ,124.72. 1 To Have and to Mold the same unto the said grantee and , grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever. 1 1 In construing this deed the singular includes the plural as the circumstances may require. Witness grantor's hand this 28 day ofJune, 1968. . (;(14). ."1_1/4 id7(4 STATE OF OREGON ) ss. June pg ,19o&. County of Washington ) • r , Personally appeared the above named ALFRED BELL and ack- t -nocgledged the foregoing instrument to be his voluntary. act and deed. otnry public for Oregon My Comm.Expires. Peb.7,1972 STATE OF OREGON ) ss. June ?g ,1968. 1 County of 1ashin-ton Personally appeared the above named GRACE D. GOULDSTOF;!: and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be her free act and deed as executrix of the .estate of Erwin T. Wills, deceased. Before me: rp , 7 /�//}1 !p t . c, ( - .�4fi�l f_r 327. (2l tf t.f.P- ✓ 1 Notaly Public 1i Oregon i " My Comm. Expires: Oct.7'),l97O j " • .. kM 1 ..' fri iV-, Filed fol, ,R 1Brl o f'..�.,.t:, i j B(i i( (V ; hi,o_l.,.Q..i ROritu T O2 S,th Dur s of uc 1 .& Lloct'l.;-�e 1S 2 - Deed s �/,• , .4'--f..,w.l<..K'D.rwy .- � .tTEN *t7 • • • 1! 215'3 , Number: !Seed Reference' i KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we E ._.b_ Vernon L Trigg and Bernice Trigg, husband and wife. (Tax Lot 200 2$ 1 4A) __ _ 4 ._l•t�U i hereinafter termed granlor(st, in consideration of the sum of S_ CITY OF TIGARD. a municipal corporation - to r paid1 E p of Oregon, hereinafter termed the City, hereby grant, bargain, sell and comcy unto the CITY OF TIGARD a perpetual right-of way and easement as hereinafter described, together • with a temporary right-•d'-.cay and casement to use an Additional area hereinafter described and designated temporary easement.for the following uses and purposes' 4 i i 1 1. Perpetual easement: . f ! An unencumbered perpetual right-obway and casement for the purpose of constructing. region- • S structing, operating. maintaining, m,p.•c:in¢and repairing of an underground sewer line and i - appurtenances,together with the right io rein -.e,as necessary. sc,;c:atwn, foliage•trees and other obstructions within the easement area. but rescrsu••, to the grantors the title to the lands.subject to to the casement, and the right to make such use thereof,except to construct buildings. 1 t a i as will not interfere with the uses and purposes of the easement; said easement area being 7.5 1 t feet on each side,when measured at right angles, of the following described center line within the 1 following designated premises: i . Beginning at a point on the northerly line of that tract of land in deed to Vernon L. and Bernice Trigg, recorded 9 Book 318, page 172, Washington County, Oregon, said point being North 87°04' West, 157.30 feet from the northeast corner of said tract; thence south 43°40' West 453.05 feet '_�,,' �J to a point; thence South 0°30' West 100.00 feet to the d` j Iouthwest corner of said Trigg tract. if 1 • Being limited to that portion lying within the boundaries j of said Trigg tract. t i The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, stated in terms of dollars, is $1.00. i 1 • f • d • i . $ • i . a • f 2. Tempereiry easement: • Together with the temporaryright of ingress• egress and regress, and use for sewer construct - tion purposes, of additional Lands lying parallel to. along both sides and within . 15 when measured at right angles. of the above described perpetuala -fans f+ reserving to grantors the unencumbered enluymant. use and presertationa area. lCetru strupting ctures - present upon the premises This temporary easement ,hall terminate upon completion of the• 1 sewer construction work. at which time, upon request of the owner. the City will isaue a written release thereof. ill i' Era• 734 sac;562 . t i a • 21�5 i I. i • I .I 1 t i Should it be necessary. to cut and remove any brush. trees. or other matter nr materials from the casement area. said brush. Imes. or other matter and materials shall lie removed and disposed of by the City and tha City shall lease the easement area in a moat and work manlike condition. The City agrees that in connection if I with its use of the perpetual ea<v n;rnt area and in insaerting.repatnng,main4imm^,or replacing said sewer � } line.the City will lease the premises Jra neat and workmanlike condition and as nearly in the preexisting state • i as practicable The ;ranlors du hereby warrant that they are the owners in fee simply and have the right to grant the 11 above described easements. (y� y--- �• , Witness our hands and seals this --f G -day of sfJ YI _ 19.1I..... • '• ---- --' --.. -----. JSEAL) 1/Lif�_.., •-�- - <sE.4Li .# s __.. _ __ ___. ___—_ --._ (SEAL) L� -.- 1j� SEAL) .(SEAL) -__ ___ __..-__- (SEAL) i For a consideration, the mortgage lien on the above described properties is hereby made subordinate to the easements shove granted. IDated this _day of -_____ _. _._. -.__.19_- - Mortgagee • a — -- — note 11 STATE OF OREGON. 1 Le1 . 1 County of ._`4 shington—_ _. ) On this /C -day of.. September. _. 1 8. - .. _ . personally appeared the above named Vernon_i.. Trigg and Bernice Trigg. —_—_ - and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and doe4 Before me: l /y/S/� ..n N • b f Oregon 'f My Commission expires:0) Con:misa.an Esptres SeW: 21'.1:�1 4111 3 —-t r-r� _ - • :tatrj . i 1 - 1 . r r' • • ` • • } • • • • • 2133 I, DORIS HARTIG, hereby certify that I am the duly appointed, qualified, and acting Recorder for the City of Tigarc:, Oregon. I further certify that I have compared the herewith copy with the original in my possession as custodian of the official records of the City of Tigard, and that the here- with copy is a true and complete copy thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and seal of • the City of Tigard this 27th day of February 1969. :� City / T Recorder • J :1332/ ' • • RESTRICTIVE COVENANT THE UNDERSIGNED, as the fee owner of the following described real property, the same being the real property now duly platted as BELLWOOD Subdivision, as said plat is now recorded in Book 27 , Page 10 , of the Plat Records of the County of Washington , State of Oregon, hereby make the following (additional) declarations as to limitations, restrictions, and uses to which the lots and/or tracts constituting said addition may be put, hereby specifying that said declarations shall constitute covenants to run with all the land, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon all parties and all persons claiming under them, and for the benefit of and limitations upon all future owners and said addition, this declaration of restrictions being •designed for the purpose of keeping said addition desirable, uniform, attractive and suitable in design and use as herein specified: No outdoor overhead wire or service drop for the distribution of electric energy or for telecommunication purposes nor any pole, tower, or other structure supporting said outdoor overhead wires shall be erected, placed, or maintained within this subdivision. All purchasers of lots or tracts within this subdivision, their heirs, successors, and assigns shall use underground service wires to connect their premises and the structures built thereon to the underground electric or telephone utility facilities. i • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 16th day of May 1969 , J ¢ ayr on ilder7n . Execute Appropriate Attached Notary Form 4-2M3 a .. �' Mk,Q� c•..ii 1"1", ,...-FOIO ` t' APPROVED AS TO = TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2 i yy ^• ` pyre " MANAGER •ii }��' ,�•a _ _ • SME SRETCM STAOW IS MADE Si{r.ELI tOR Tr: AUItPOSt JP A, ._' '.Wil WweU•u E4'^ PIt.NiSES AND ENT COMPANY ASSDMTS NO LIANATT FOR VARIATIONS, ZTEM ti 9 i , II IMfNSIONS AND LOCAliONS ASCIREAMEr ' ..CTVAL SURVEY. s ` ../ /L. •4 3 . IN THE Ni.. il4 SEC+ i;:. <,T-2SR-I'''',4/.. 5 'YA;>hLYIir;.' t .^CY:N:Y, RE..uiri x.r7reL YMxT t mew-•o-.. 11.9.•-1' I4 :I: ij �i L r..-�y 3 N rl se he y n 1t n"-.--:-.,•,.. .,..:,..1,. 7. lr.-.Wee 4�� ",r1 1 « C. cif F:) S� i1. ..v�..�w� % t .� . 917 R •.f r.E ' I rri 4'. ' jr1 :'p▪ 5 d C 1. -('.'i .�STy iC_A�T ,t .�i7rR . x r 1 re L �f f _ b.., • , @�r' IISI «' n. 75 ry �P y F �. r. 1p 1 r _ • •• ' _ . '� '' ' I_,.,,i • e ,' 'r•r J if i'. JT4rjt 1 •41 U . iti ��-„ .1. 11 trr JJ " t ir r 1� r � k • \� er, ••- ,' : —_ -� r-=Te.1s- K t 4 Ll :t ��---!__ ' is f: .• 3' t� I• „77« r (x I 1! ::' f f ryf.'+ t \t it r, `i ')tlw ,,f0 1 'tP t l ''" jV 39 iYSCr'A' ...,'r_<_, • �s ; :�� -*•'--Lam"--� 4 t o ?~,•. . .. ..-..r._•.... - „ell — _� ;..rare:Et) It . $'N.. ( .: ' 4 1. •v '•r i_ „ niT-;3 •1` _M•_' lj t !t l� `It i ,a a1 la .• 4t 'SS . • 1II t, -1 jl -4--P m. ._▪ . . _.y _._ ra'f_� •-- I 3•f"r3V .. 41..0/' vw_ ' • f _ . L—'" ' • I • A 17. h i 'If .. •'• (,•:- e. -=�S...y , t wi n .- :{ • ' - • e; .: Ir S r:; - e \ Nt- E - Illw I• eI �r ,. . •' i, , A'.t sI%AN3 aCaV 117t r...$I:usa• +.+:Jr.:...14.Eurxr N e 'P- — 81 xi_ g n+,:_1A•e9 IerordwrJ map pr.pwrd•r yr �-�- •E1 T!7!f INSURANCE Co.— --__._ 35,4. M,nr raf._,_-__ sr rp C,aM 4,4_ • / 'f i : _ _ STEM 4 ►a • 2i . t, - Number: 4.11 • • Deed Reference: KNOW ALL MEN BY T}IESF. PRESENTS: That we (IL___, Al.FP.SD •- r _a..slag 1e. mane __ _ _ et hereinafter termed grantnn ^.si, in ennsidereti of the vain of e _ 1-�'0_ tbI CITY OF TIGARD, a municipal corporation of Oregon, hereinafter termed the City, herebybargain, f paid by j I j and convey unto the CITY OF TIGARD a perpetual right•ofway and easement as hereinafter described, together with a temporary rightof-way and easement oi use an additional area hereinafter described and designated temporary easement,for the following uses and purposes 1 L m Perpetual easeent: j • An unencumbered perpetual right-of-way and easement for the purpose of constructing, recon i strucung, operating, maintaining, inspecting and repairing of an underground sewer line and 'appurtenances, together with the right to remove,as necessary, ,egelation. foliage, trees and other 1 obstructions within the easement area, but reserving to the grantors the title to the lands. I subject to the easement, and the right to make such use thereof,except to construct buildings. • 1 as will not interfere with the uses and purposes of the easement;said easement area betng.7.5. feet on each side, when measured at right angles, of the following described center line within the Ii following designated Premises: Begnn'.ng at a point on the Forth line of the 1 described tract, designated Tract 9°hereinafter West 69.0 feet from the I7orti:cast corner lofysaid tract; thence t South 21° 27' West 232.3 feet to a point on the southerly 1 line of the hereinafter described Tract II, said point be- ing 07° 04' West 157.30 feet from the :southeast corner of i Tact II, described -as follows: T•:act Il: Beginning at a point marking the :southeast corner . I of the eo.rtheast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Sec- tion 4, Tetmsh:".a 2 South, ange•1 West, W.M. County, Oreg n; rthhlineon � t.�ence :heat :aralJel to the North line of said .section 4, 465.7 feet t:, a point; thence :south parallel L to the .:ast line of said Section 4 193.3 feet to the Northwest corner or the Vernon L. Tr'^• pro;erty; taonce :ast parallel to t.:^ North I'n_ of rare. ;ecti.on 4 and along the North line J e of sad Trigg` pzo_,crty 466.7 feet to the :aot I j 3ect'.an 4; thence "t_1`-n_ of said N rth al.oa tic cat ?:inc of sou' 'Section 4, 193.3 feet tc the point of L_ginn`.ng. i i The true and actual consideration paid for this transfer, ? stated in terms of dollars, is $1.00. ► i I t • 1 - e 7. Temporary easement: ► Together with the temporary right of ingress, egress and regress, and use for sewer construe• t F Lion purposes. of additional lands lying parallel to,along both sides and Serthin__ t l When measured at right angles, of the ghost dcscnbed -�` - -!and i reserving to grantors.thc unencumbered enjoyments perpetualpeasement area. t( structures and 4 J )menb use and private Lien of at( f present upon the premises. This temporary easement shall terminate upon completiun of the sewer construction work, at which time, upon request of the owner, the City will ,s,ue a i, written release thereof. t Ile t . oK 734 r,cE 550 4. 1 r • • 25. { F Should it be necessary to cut and remove airy brush, trees, or other matter or materials from the easement + 1 area. said brush. trees, or other mailer and materials shall he removed and disposed of by the City and thel City shall lease the easement area in a neat and workmanlike condition. The City agrees that in connection with its use of the perpetual easement area and in inspecting.repairing. mainlaminc.or replacing said sewer line. Inc City will least the premises in a neat and w:.rk manlike condition and as nearly in the pro.existing stale i as practicable. The grantors do hereby warrant that they are the owners in fee simple and have the right to grant the .! yl above described easements- i r. 1. Witness our hands and seals this. 17t:t_day of _�E)i C^.7JC' ig 63 __ $ s. .t':4-e el ate-��' ---- ------ - ----. _fsgAL) - - -- - 1{ --- - (SEAL) -___..- -_. _ --. — _ -'—. ill • .�-fSEALI (SEAI.y i _(SEAL) _- _ .. (SEALY ii I • �� a / 2I25 If i1 fr i. s1 I I, DORIS HARTIC, heree i1 t qualified, and acting Recorderyforathe CityhofdTigard, Oregon, pointed, i' t gg I further certify that I have compared the herewith copy I with the original in my possession as custodian of the t official records of the City of Tigard, and that the here- { i with copy is a true and complete copy thereof, i a IN WITNESS WHFR=OF I have hereunto set my hand and seal of i I the City of Tigard this 27th day of February 1969. t i i • r + r City Recorder ill/ f i ° 4 FA55z • • • • • • Should it be necessary to cut and remove any brush. trees, or other matter or materials from the easement ,area. said brush. trces. or other matter and materials shall be remosed and disposed of by the City and the City shall lease the casement area in a neat and work manlike cundition. The ray agrees that in connection with its use of the perpetual easement area and in inspecting. repamne. maintaining,or replacing said sewer I line.the City will lease tie premises in a neat and work manlike condition and as nearly in the pre-eexisting state as practicable. The Grantors do hereby warrant that they are the asters in.fee simple and have the right to grant the above described easements. 1 Witness our hands and scats this. 1%711_day of f_)tC^)Je'_ 19 fj� 1 , f e _(SEAL) ! t __-- (SEAL) J • t _._ ..--- (SEAL) ___—_—_ _--- _(SEAL) For a consideration. the mortgage lien on the above described properties is hereby made subordinate to the easements above granted. Dated this 17tn day of ig • Mortgagee _ _ • STATE OF OREGON. I Title County _sr._tl i ton ) oL_u �; ---- On this 7.7t:1 _dayo!__.ve«Q.1: ._,. lA .__._._..personally'appeared the above named i 3,. r.r n_ss :1 inn _ 1 and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be their voluntary act and deed. - -—_- - -- Before ate: 1 /�t' e.7, (/. ( Notary Public for Oregon • My Com(tission espires:______14.-41 ' • • i • I_ 212s • I, DORIS RTTdGhereby certify that I am the duly qualified acting Recorder for the City appointed. I further certify of Tigard, Oregon. with the that I have compared official records�ofnt my possession as the herewith cony withcustodian of the • • copy is a true and City et `Copy t and that the here- � WITNESS r complete copy thereof. the IT WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and seal•of q of Tigard this 27th day of February 1969. I • ;. y eco er • • • ecz i 734 F 55z Washington County,Oregon 2008-100779 12'" '2006 01:47:36 PM D• Cnto1 Stno29 RECORDSI $15.00$5.00$11.00-Total=$31.00 After Recording A Co Owner Mx dra N(a5 d✓A-/ley i i e s�2esc cl� 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 Address 20(Q $--tv• 81 'ip� 013154762006010077800 030 ikl-I L 02 9r[oo7 I,Richard Hob.micht,Director of Amos mint and Taxation and Ex-Ofncio County Clark for Wuhlntton File No.: CUP200 -00003 county,Orpon,do hanby certify that tilt within ,;" Inatrumant ofr wrlenp wu raplvad and re orded In the book of raeonia or paid cou (cit 1fA, � Richard Hobamlehl,Dirac or orAunamerit and '<-4,a;,:M1' Taxation,ExORlclo County Clark TREE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT DEED RESTRICTION Declarant is the owner of property described as 2,S LDS Ali O45 O Declarant has preserved or retained trees over and across portions of said property in accordance with the Conditions of Approval of said plat. Any such preserved or retained tree may be removed only if the tree dies or is hazardous according to a certified arborist. This deed restriction may be removed or will be considered invalid if all trees preserved in accordance with this section should either die or be removed as hazardous. THIS AGREEMENT shall be deemed a Covenant running with the land and is binding upon the owners of property described as 2'3 I O- 14-Q oy 5c X Washington County, Oregon and their successors and assigns. • IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Declarant has executed this agreement on that date and year set forth below. DECLARANT: 7744 •al Algid r 2e /2—,c4•4 e� • 9 i tv t ti Cat� 2 STATE OF OREGON, COUNTY OF WASHINGTON This instrument was acknowledged before me by t ( /�Est J✓ x(he_iq s 9 -2-c to NOTARY PUB OREGON Date My Commission Expires • SWfRLEE OFFICIAL N07 J OCO , ARy PUBLIC-OREGOMNORN 0my COMMISSION �S MAR.19,2010 c � , • • APN: 8480688 Statutory Warranty Deed File No.:7034-845978(nt) -continued Date:06/28/2006 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the East half of the North half of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 4,Township 2 South,Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian,and running thence West 466,7 feet to a point, running thence North 466.7 feet to a point; thence East 466.7 feet to a point, running thence South 466.7 feet to the place of beginning; _ _. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following property: A tract of land in Section 4,Township 2 South, Range 1 West,Willamette Meridian, In the City of Tigard, Washington County,State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the quarter corner on the East line of said Section 4,thence South by 89° 18'West, on the South line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 4, 299.2 feet to an iron pipe;thence North 1°42' West, parallel with the East line of said Section 4,655.4 feet to a point In the center of County Road No. 934 from which point an iron bears South 1°42' East 20.0 feet,thence North 89° 22'East 235.0 feet to the true point of beginning of the herein described premises; thence North 1°42'West to a point on the South line of County Road No, 934; thence Northeasterly along said South line to a point on the East line of said Section 4; thence South 1°42'East along said East line to a point that bears North 89°22' East 64.2 feet from the true point of beginning; thence South 89°22'West 64.2 feet to the true point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following property: A tract of land in Section 4,Township 2 South, Range 1 West,Willamette Meridian, in the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the quarter corner on the East line of said Section 4, thence South by 89° 18'West,on the South line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 4,299.2 feet to an Iron pipe;thence North 1°42' West, parallel with the East line of said Section 4,655.4 feet to a point In the center of County Road No, 934 from which point an iron bears South 1°42'East 20,0 feet,thence North 89°22' East 235.0 feet to , the true point of beginning of the herein described premises;thence North 1°42'West to a point on the South line of County Road No. 934; thence Southwesterly along said South line to a point on the North line of that certain tract described in deed to Sever 0. Severson,et ux, recorded January 03, 1941 In Book 195, Page 153,Washington County Deed Records;thence North 89° 22' East to the true point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following property: The property situated In the City of Tigard, Washington County, State of Oregon described as follows: Beginning at a point which is South 1°42' 20"West 220.35 feet,and North 87°26'00"West 157.30 feet from the Southeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 4,Township 2 South, Range 1 West,Willamette Meridian in the City of Tigard,Washington County, State of Oregon; thence South 44° 32' 13"West 453.05 feet; thence North 1° 26' 40"East 336.90 feet; thence South 87° 26'CO'' East 309.57 feet to the point of beginning. Page 3 of 4 • 'I' 1 , • 1 • APN:R430688 Statutory Warranty Deed Fie No.:7034-845978(nt) -continued Date:06/26/2006 ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following property conveyed to Washington County recorded February 07, 2005 as Fee No. 2005-013084. • �g5OR�Tgx I, Richard W. Hobernicht, • of Assessment andTaxation and Ex-Offi ' County Clerk for k % `'�::; u:`�t, Washington County, d reby certify this to be,a . y..;-�,ate, ;,; �'?Id/`�;,'�i true and correct co of the original. �� 1n�f .r��xs: � 00(a • +.1V�yv i:� Date: f ° CrON C6014 /j Page 4 of 4. • Appendix F. Natural Resource Assessment • 110 Appendix F F-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • Natural Resource Assessment for Proposed Improvements at Jack Park in Tigard, Oregon (Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Section 4AA, portion of tax lot 4600 and Section 4AD, Portion of Tax Lot 4501) Prepared for City of Tigard Tigard, OR Prepared by • Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Wilsonville, Oregon (503)570-0800 July 26, 2012 • • Natural Resource Assessment for Proposed Improvements at Jack Park in Tigard, Oregon (Township 2 South, Range 1 West, Section 4AA, portion of tax lot 4600 and Section 4AD, Portion of Tax Lot 4501) Prepared for City of Tigard Attn: Steve Martin 13127 SW Hall Boulevard Tigard,OR 97223 • Prepared by Shawn Eisner Amy Hawkins Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (503)570-0800 (503)570-0855 FAX PHS Project Number: 4889 July 26,2012 • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 3.0 DELINEATION OF WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS 1 4.0 VEGETATED CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT 3 4.1 Vegetated Corridor Width Determination 3 4.2 Vegetated Corridor Plant Communities 3 4.3 Vegetated Corridor Plant Community Condition 6 5.0 PROPOSED PROJECT 7 5.1 Project Overview 7 5.2 Alternatives Analysis 8 5.3 Discussion of Wetland and Vegetated Corridor Functions and Values 10 5.4 Vegetated Corridor Mitigation and Enhancement 11 • APPENDIX A: Figures APPENDIX B: Wetland Delineation Data Points APPENDIX C: NRA Definitions and Methodology and References • • 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. (PHS)conducted a natural resource assessment(NRA)for the proposed Trail Project in Jack Park in Tigard, Oregon(Township 2 South,Range 1 West, Section 4AA,portion of tax lot 4600 and Section 4AD,Portion of Tax Lot 4501). The City of Tigard (City)is proposing to construct a trail through the southeast portion of the park, over Krueger Creek,where the trail will connect to an existing trail within the park. The project area is shown on Figure I; Figure 2 identifies existing conditions at the site. Figures are in Appendix A. This report presents the definitions and the methodology used to assess the natural resources on the property as required by Clean Water Services(CWS).The natural resource assessment for this site includes a vegetated corridor analysis as well as a discussion of sensitive areas located within the park(See Appendix B for wetland delineation data points).A brief discussion of the definitions and the methodology required by CWS to determine the location and extent of regulated vegetated corridors within the project area is located in Appendix C. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The study area includes portions of tax lots 4501 and 4600;both of these areas are within Jack Park. Krueger Creek flows northeast through the study area,and wetlands are present adjacent to the creek. The riparian area adjacent to the creek is forested with a mature red alder(Alnus rubra)canopy. Himalayan blackberry(Rubus discolor)is present within much of the understory. The area west of Krueger Creek, in the northern portion of the study area, is comprised of open, • mowed lawn,though red alder trees line the creek in this area. 3.0 DELINEATION OF WATER QUALITY SENSITIVE AREAS The creek and adjacent wetlands in the southwestern portion of the site were previously delineated by PBS Engineering and Environmental(PBS),and a Service Provider Letter(SPL) issued for the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue(TVFR)facility(SPL 07-002492). As such, PHS did not perform a delineation of this area,but did confirm that the wetland and vegetated corridor boundaries in this area have not changed. On April 25,2012,PHS, Laura Herbon,and the City met with CWS for a pre-application meeting. As a result of that meeting, PHS revisited Jack Park on May 8, 2012,to make a determination of the approximate location of wetlands and vegetated corridors on the northwest side of Krueger Creek,on tax lot 4501. The delineation area was therefore defined as the west side of Krueger Creek in the northern portion of the study area and both sides of the creek,as well as adjacent wetlands in the central portion of the study area. PHS performed a delineation of wetlands and the creek in these areas on December 7,2011. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 1 • Krueger Creek As noted above,the study area includes Krueger Creek,which flows northeast through the study area. The ordinary high water line(OHWL)of the creek is coincident with the top of bank of the creek. The riparian area is dominated by red alder in the northern portion of the study area, and by red alder, Himalayan blackberry,and common horsetail (Equisetum arvense)within the central portion of the site. Wetland A Wetland A is located west of Krueger Creek,in the northern portion of the study area. Wetland A is 3,612 square feet(sf)(0.08acre)in size,and connects to the OHWL of Krueger Creek. The Cowardin Class is palustrine,emergent(PEM)and the HGM class is Slope. Wetland A is dominated by a mix of lawn-seed grasses that are regularly mowed. Hydrology within Wetland A appears to be from a shallow groundwater table that seeps from the hill slope through the wetland,and into the creek. Wetland A does not continue outside of the study area. Wetland B Wetland B is located west of Krueger Creek, in the central portion of the study area. Wetland B, as delineated by PHS is 4,853 sf(0.11 acres)in size within the study area,and connects to the OHWL of Krueger Creek.The Cowardin Class is palustrine, forested(PFO)and the HGM class is Slope. • Within the study area, Wetland B is dominated by red alder,common horsetail, creeping buttercup(Ranunculus repens)and small fruited bulrush(Scirpus microcarpus). Hydrology is driven by a shallow groundwater table. Wetland B continues southwest outside of the study area (see Wetland D described below). A swale vegetated with slough sedge(Carex obnupta)and black cottonwood(Populus balsamifera) is located north of Wetland B,and was investigated;however,this area did not meet wetland criteria(see data point 9). This feature is an manmade, ephemeral swale that treats stormwater from the Marie Circle cul-de-sac. Wetland C Wetland C is located east of Krueger Creek,in the central portion of the study area. Wetland C is 4,885 sf(0.11 acres)in size within the study area,and connects to the OHWL of Krueger Creek. The Cowardin Class is PEM and the HGM class is Slope. Within the study area, Wetland C is dominated by small fruited bulrush and common horsetail. Hydrology is driven by a shallow groundwater table. Wetland C continues southwest and northeast outside of the study area. • Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 2 • Wetland D Wetland D is located west of Kruger Creek, in the southern portion of the study area(adjacent to Wetland B,described above). Wetland D was not delineated;however,the approximate boundary of the wetland was determined by PHS on May 8,2012. Dominant vegetation includes reed canarygrass(Phalaris arundinacea),common horsetail,and small fruited bulrush. 4.0 VEGETATED CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT 4.1 Vegetated Corridor Width Determination Krueger Creek is perennial, and slopes adjacent to the creek and Wetland A in the northern portion of the site are less than 25%.Therefore the regulated width of the vegetated corridor is 50-feet in this area(Figure 2).The slopes adjacent to the creek and Wetlands B and D are also less than 25%and therefore the regulated width of the vegetated corridor is also 50-feet in these areas. Slopes are generally less than 25%adjacent to Wetland C,and therefore the regulated width of the vegetated corridor is 50 feet. There is one area adjacent to Wetland C where slopes are 26%;however,the vegetated corridor is truncated by the new parking lot for the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue,which is existing development. The vegetated corridor in this area is 50 feet. The NRA completed by PBS in 2007 identified Krueger Creek and adjacent wetlands, as well as slopes adjacent to these features. As stated above, PHS confirmed the wetland location in this • area, and slopes have not changed.Per this NRA,the northeast half of the corridor contains slopes that are less than 25%resulting in a corridor width of 50 feet. The southwest half of the corridor contains slopes that are greater than 25%. In this area,the calculated width of the corridor was determined by adding a 35-foot buffer to the observable slope break. This results in a corridor width of 55 to 75 feet along the wetland boundary in the southeast portion of the study area. 4.2 Vegetated Corridor Plant Communities Vegetated corridors in the vicinity of the proposed development fall into three general plant communities; mowed lawn with a small amount of tree canopy(Community A), forested with Himalayan blackberry(Communities B and E),and native plantings per the planting plan associated with SPL 07-002492(Communities C and D). Photo documentation of the on-site portion of the vegetated corridor is included in Figures 3A-3D. Plant Community A(17,163 sf) is located adjacent to Wetland A, in the northwestern portion of the study area. Plant Community A includes no trees and no native plant species,though partial shading is provided by trees along Krueger Creek.. This is an area of mowed non-native lawn. Predominant grass species that were identifiable include annual bluegrass(Poa annua),and velvet grass(Holcus lanatus). Small amounts of other,typically weedy species including creeping buttercup,English daisy(Bellis perennis), and bitter cress(Cardamine sp.)are also present. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 3 • Table 1. Plant Community A - Lawn Botanical Name Common Name Cover(%) Herbaceous: Mixed(mowed)lawn grasses, including the following 50°. Holcus lanatus Velvet grass Poa Annua Annual bluegrass Ranunculus repens Creeping buttercup 33% Bellis perennis English daisy 8% Cardamine sp. Bittercress 2% Moss Moss 20% Taraxacum ofcinale Common dandelion 1 Cover by Natives 0% %Tree Canopy 0% %Invasive/Noxious 0% *Native Species, **Invasive Species Plant Community B(15,566 sf)is located northwest and southeast of Wetland B, in the central portion of the study area. Plant Community B includes a native tree canopy of red alder with an understory of Himalayan blackberry and common horsetail. The ephemeral swale discussed in Section 3.0 above is located within this plant community. • Table 2. Plant Community B-Forested Botanical Name Common Name Cover(%) Trees: Alnus rubra* Red alder 80% Pseudotsuga menziesii* Douglas fir 5% Shrubs: Rubus discolor** Himalayan blackberry 60% Herbaceous: Equisetum arvense Common horsetail 20°o % Cover by Natives 52% %Tree Canopy 80"/o %lnvasive/Noxious 36% *Native Species, **Invasive Species Plant Community C (12,937 sf)is located southeast of Wetland C, in the central portion of the study area. Plant Community C(in the vicinity of the trail crossing)is comprised of non-native grasses and forbs,though one large Douglas fir is present and shades much of southwestern portion of this plant community. • Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 4 • Table 3. Plant Community C -Herbaceous Botanical Name Common Name Cover(%) Trees: Pseudotsuga menziesii* Douglas fir 5% Herbaceous: Equisetum arvense Common horsetail 45% Dactylis glomerata Orchard grass 50% Festuca arundinacea Tal l fescue 10% % Cover by Natives 1% %Tree Canopy 5% %Invasive/Noxious 0% *Native Species,**Invasive Species Plant Community D(19,627 sf)is located southeast of Krueger Creek,in the southern portion of the study area. Per the NRA submitted by PBS in 2007,vegetation in this area consists of bentgrass (Agrostis sp), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), bluegrass (Poa sp.), and orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata). Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea)and common horsetail are also present adjacent to the wetland. This area has very little shrub or tree cover. Per the as-built submitted with final design plans for SPL 07-002492, plant communities C and D have been planted with big leaf maple(Acer macrophyllum),red alder,red-osier dogwood (Corn us sericea), Pacific ninebark(Physocarpus capitatus),snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus,), • and red elderberry(Sambucus racemosa). In 2007,these plant communities were determined to be in"degraded"condition. However,these plant communities are on a trajectory to"good" corridor condition,now that native trees and shrubs have been planted within these two communities. Plant Community E(13,663)is located northwest of Krueger Creek and Wetland D, in the southern portion of the study area. Plant Community E is comprised of a mixed riparian scrub/shrub community. The northern and southern portions of the plant community have a canopy cover of 80%,while the central portion has 0%canopy cover(NRA data points 1,2, and 3). Table 4. Plant Community E—Riparian Scrub-Shrub Botanical Name Common Name Cover(%) Trees: Alnus rubra* Red alder 20% Pseudotsuga menziesii* Douglas fir 10% Crataegus monogyna One-seed hawthorn 30% Sal ix sp. Willow 5% Sal ix matsudana Curly willow 3% Shrubs: Rubus discolor** Himalayan blackberry 80% Cotylus cornuta* Beaked hazelnut 5% Lonicerainvolucrata* Black twinberry 5% Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 5 • Botanical Name Common Name Cover(%) Symphoricarpos alhus* Snowberry % Rosa nutkana* Nootka rose 3% Spiraea douglasii* Douglas spiraea 10% Amelanchier alnifolia* Service berry 5% Ilex aquifolium** Holly 3% Herbaceous: Equisetum arvense Common horsetail 80% Polystichummunitum* Sword fern 10% Rubus ursinus* Trailing blackberry 3 % Cover by Natives 27% %Tree Canopy 60% %lnvasive/Noxious 29% *Native Species, **Invasive Species 4.3 Vegetated Corridor Plant Community Condition The following table summarizes the condition of the plant communities in accordance with Clean Water Services' standards. Table 5. Summary of Plant Community Plant Community • Corridor Condition A B C D E >80%cover of native Trajectory to Trajectory to>80% 80%Tree >80%Natives; 60%Tree Good plants,and>50%tree CanopyTrajectory to>50% Natives;Trajectory to Canopy Canopy Tree Canopy >50%Tree Canopy 50%-80%cover of Marginal native plants,and 26- 52% 50%tree canopy Natives <50%cover of native o% Degraded plants,and <25% Natives 0/Tree; 27%Natives tree canopy Canopy The condition of the vegetated corridor is determined by the percentages of native species and canopy cover. Community A is in"degraded"due to the lack of native vegetation and trees. For Communities B and E, a condition of"marginal" is most appropriate. This designation takes into account the tree canopy(which would normally meet"good"condition), though much of the understory is dominated by Himalayan blackberry.Plant Communities C and D are in"degraded" condition, although they have been planted with native trees and shrubs,and are on a trajectory to "good"corridor condition. • Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 6 • 5.0 PROPOSED PROJECT 5.1 Project Overview The project description as described in the Conceptual Site Master Plan is comprised of six components, including a playground, community gardens, Krueger Creek crossing,tree removal, stormwater, and a trail that will connect the two sides of Jack park. The Conceptual Site Master Plan provides a long-term vision of the recreational enhancements proposed for this property, and the elements described represent the full development of the park. The project construction budget has been finalized, and a phased development approach is necessary. The initial phase will include only the trail and bridge components and will be considered a linear development project.The project described below includes Phase 1,which is comprised of the trail and Krueger Creek crossing(Figure 4). The remaining project components as described in the Conceptual Master Plan may be constructed as funding becomes available. Trail A six foot wide asphalt trail with one foot gravel shoulders is proposed for pedestrian and bicycle users.An asphalt surface will allow complete ADA accessibility, year-round use, durability, and future ease of maintenance.The proposed width of the trail is the minimum necessary to serve the intended use.The proposed trail was developed according to the following criteria: • Provide a connection between the Jack Park expansion parcel and(i.e.tax lot 4501)and • the existing park. • Provide a 6 foot wide trail(with one foot shoulders)that can support pedestrians, bicycles and gator equipment for park maintenance and future surveillance. • Meet ADA accessibility criteria for the longitudinal and cross slopes. • Use surface materials that are durable. • Minimize impacts to wetlands, creeks, and associated vegetated corridors. • Minimize impacts to significant healthy trees. • Minimize impacts to the degree possible within the vegetated corridor. • Avoid sharp turns that compromise safety and visibility. The proposed Jack Park Trail will meander through tax lot 4501,and then head north to connect with the existing walking trail within the park on tax lot 4600. The asphalt trail will form a loop at the existing parking area for the TVFR facility.This portion of the trail will be gently sloped and completes the ADA accessible route to the fire station facility and Community Room. This area also forms a"plaza"around the future playground, which will provide space for community gathering, and other future park amenities such as benches,bicycle parking racks, and a drinking fountain. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 7 • A narrower,steeper, and direct trail connection is also provided from the ADA accessible asphalt trail to the access point for the fire station facility and Community Room. This secondary route is proposed to be constructed of crushed gravel surfacing with wood steps, and offers an alternate route up the slope for park users who want to get to their destination quickly without traveling around the trail on the ADA accessible route. This section will also preclude the future establishment of a user-generated/rogue trail connection in this area. Krueger Creek Bridge Crossing An engineered bridge span will be necessary where the proposed trail crosses Krueger Creek. To avoid impacts to sensitive lands,the bridge will completely span the OHWL of Krueger Creek and the associated wetland benches on each side of the creek. A pre-manufactured wooden pony truss style bridge is planned with a 6 foot clear width to accommodate pedestrians,bicycles and occasional maintenance vehicles. In addition to a wood structure,the bridge will have a wood deck and wooden guard rail features. Wood materials will fit aesthetically within the riparian woodland setting. The bridge will be set well above the estimated 10-year flood level occurrence of 212.6 feet to minimize potential for trapping floating debris under or against the proposed bridge during a larger flood and to facilitate better wildlife passage under the bridge structure. Tree Removal Fifteen trees will be removed within the vegetated corridor(Figure 5). These include two • common hawthorn(Crataegus monogyna)and a sycamore maple(Platanus occidentalis),which are non-native. Six dead or hazard/unhealthy red alder trees will be removed for the placement of the bridge, and the construction of the trail north of the Krueger Creek crossing. A cluster of six healthy red alder trees will also be removed for the placement of the bridge. Stormwater No water quality treatment is proposed for the runoff from the new trail or the bridge.Runoff from the trail will be allowed to sheet flow into the adjacent vegetation or sheet flow off the bridge deck down into the creek or bank vegetation below. A bioswale is being constructed and planted during Phase Ito manage and treat stormwater runoff associated with pavement in this area prior to releasing toward Krueger Creek. In a future phase,the bioswale may also accept the under drain runoff from the playground area when constructed. 5.2 Alternatives Analysis As this project proposes encroachment that exceeds 30 percent of the depth of the existing vegetated corridor(on tax lot 4501), a Tier 11 analysis is required. The proposed project will meet the Tier 2 Alternative Analysis criteria and responses to each of the criteria are provided below. 1. The proposed encroachment area is mitigated in accordance with Section 3.08. The proposed permanent vegetated corridor encroachments will be mitigated within park boundaries, northeast of the project area in accordance with Section 3.08 of R&O 07-20. The proposed mitigation ratio of 1 to 1 for impacts to marginal and degraded communities meets the • Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 8 • criteria set forth in table 3-2, Section 3.08.2. The replacement(mitigation)areas are in addition to the existing vegetated corridor and are contiguous. Temporary encroachments for access and staging will be reseeded as necessary. 2. The replacement mitigation protects the functions and values of the Vegetated Corridor and Sensitive Area. The proposed vegetated corridor mitigation plan has been designed to protect the functions and values of the sensitive areas and vegetated corridor.Mitigation is proposed for upland areas adjoining existing vegetated corridors north of Krueger Creek and associated wetlands. Mitigation associated with the project totals 2,487 square feet. 3. Enhancement of the replacement area,if not already in Good Corridor Condition,and either the remaining Vegetated Corridor on the site or the first 50 feet of width closest to the resource,whichever is less, to a Good Corridor Condition. Proposed replacement and enhancement areas range from degraded to marginal condition, despite the general presence of native species in the canopy where present. Invasive species are common throughout proposed replacement and enhancement areas. The applicant will remove invasive species from all replacement and enhancement areas and as necessary,plant native trees, shrubs,and herbaceous cover. 4. A District Stormwater Connection Permit is likely to be issued based on proposed • plans. The proposed project is located in Tigard. The applicant reasonably expects to obtain a District Stormwater Connection Permit based on proposed plans for the project, from the District, or from the City of Tigard. 5. Location of development and site planning minimizes incursion into the Vegetated Corridor. Encroachment into the adjacent vegetated corridor has been minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Vegetated corridor encroachments are limited to those necessary for construction of the ADA compliant trail, the trail loop and the Krueger Creek crossing. 6. No practicable alternative to the location of the development exists that will not disturb the Sensitive Area or Vegetated Corridor. Several trail locations were evaluated for placement within Jack Park. The City evaluated trail placement based on the location of natural resources and vegetated corridors within the park, as well as adjacent slopes. The trail has been located outside the vegetated corridor when possible. The City of Tigard's goal for new park facilities is that new trails be fully ADA accessible.The proposed trail is located to facilitate the grading necessary to make it ADA compliant, and still provide adequate space for future amenities. Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 9 Moving the trail southeast(towards the fire station)outside of the vegetated corridor would not meet ADA requirements, or allow room for future amenities such as community gardens or playground areas. 7. The proposed encroachment provides public benefits. The proposed improvements to Jack Park will allow users to cross from one side of the park to the other.Public parking access for this park has been a long standing problem for the existing park. The proposed trail allows use of the existing parking area at TVFR 50 for park access. This connection will effectively open up the existing Jack Park to southern neighborhoods, allowing it to become an even more valuable resource to the southern residents, increasing potential park use, and reducing park misuse.The existing park area gets high usage,but the new trail is anticipated to draw even more young people and their families to the park to play, and to enjoy a sense of community provided by the park. In addition to direct public benefits provided by the trail,public benefits to water quality will be provided by a combined area of 27,514 square feet of proposed vegetated corridor enhancements and mitigation. 5.3 Discussion of Wetland and Vegetated Corridors Functions and Values The functions and values of the wetlands and vegetated corridors areas were assessed within the • study area using a modified version of the Hydrogeomorphic(HGM)Classification Judgmental Assessment Method. Water Quality and Quantity Functions: Water Storage and Delay, Sediment Stabilization and Phosphorus Retention, Nitrogen Removal The wetlands within the study area are located within the floodplain of Krueger Creek,and pond due to a shallow groundwater table,overland flow from adjacent upland slopes,as well as from large flood events from Krueger Creek. As such,water quality within these wetlands is likely relatively good. The wetlands adjacent to Krueger Creek provide water storage and delay functions,particularly during large flood events. The vegetated corridors to be impacted by this project rate low for these functions because they are not seasonally inundated. Fish and Wildlife Functions:Primary Production, Thermoregulation, Resident Fish Habitat Support,Anadromous Fish Habitat Support, Invertebrate Habitat Support,Amphibian and Turtle Habitat, Breeding Waterbird Support, Wintering and Migratory Waterbird Support, Songbird Habitat Support The wetlands within the study area are floodplain wetlands that are adjacent to Krueger Creek. Because Krueger Creek is incised within the study area, these wetlands would only provide fish habitat during very large flood events. • Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 10 • The vegetated corridors within the study area do not provide fish habitat;they are not seasonally inundated. The wetlands within the study area likely provide some wildlife habitat,though the surrounding development and SW Walnut Street limit that. The wetlands are not forested, and are comprised of non-native species,and therefore provide little in the way of cover or food resources. The adjacent vegetated corridors generally provide some wildlife value due to the presence of a forested canopy.However,the vegetated corridors are vegetated with Himalayan blackberry, a non-native species. The vegetated corridors also provide some connectivity to other habitat areas up-and downstream of the park. The perennial water source from Krueger Creek provides a low level of habitat support for invertebrate species. Native Plant Communities and Species Diversity Function: Support of Characteristic Vegetation The wetlands within the study area are almost entirely dominated by non-native species. The vegetated corridors are dominated by Himalayan blackberry,though the forested canopy of red alder is native. As such,the wetlands and their vegetated corridors scores low for native plant community and species diversity. 5.4 Vegetated Corridor Mitigation and Enhancement Mitigation A total of 3,453 square feet of vegetated corridor will be impacted by the construction of the trail. The portion of the trail that is located in the outmost 40%of the vegetated corridor is 2,576 square feet;this area includes the bridge crossing where it is perpendicular to the creek. As mitigation is not required for the first three feet of trail,mitigation is determined to be 1,610 square feet. The portion of the trail that is located in the inner 60%of the vegetated corridor is 877 square feet. Mitigation is required for the entire trail width;therefore mitigation is determined to be 877 square feet. As such,total mitigation required for the Jack Park Trail is 2,487 square feet. This includes impacts to the vegetated corridor due to the construction of the trail, including shoulders, and bridge footings. Mitigation for impacts to the vegetated corridor will be completed on-site at a ratio of 1:1. Mitigation will occur in two small areas south of Krueger Creek, and in a larger area in the northern portion of the site, as depicted on Figure 6. Mitigation includes the removal of non-native species,and planting of native trees, shrubs, and herbs. Mitigation will occur prior to or concurrent with proposed park improvements. The majority of the proposed trail south of the Krueger Creek crossing travels through the vegetated corridor.A zone of 6 feet on either side of the trail will be kept clear of trees to allow clear sight lines adjacent to the trail for user safety and ease of future maintenance. Directly adjacent to the trail,low shrubs and a naturalized rough meadow will be planted to maintain Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PHS#4889 Page 11 • visibility, provide a transition from trail to adjacent forested vegetated corridor areas,and promote a feeling of safety for park users. Shrubs in this area will be planted at a ratio of 0.06 x area in square feet,which is greater than CWS' required shrub density,to account for the lack of trees. Non-native species identified for removal include Himalayan blackberry and English ivy(Hedera helix)and English holly(Ilex aquifolium). Enhancement The project is considered a linear development project; as such, required enhancement will be an area equal to the project footprint,which is 24,024 square feet. This includes impacts to the vegetated corridor due to the construction of the trail,shoulders, bridge footings,and temporary grading. The enhancement area will be located in the northern of the study area,as shown on Figure 6.The enhancement area will avoid the interior drip line of several large trees that have large tree canopies. Enhancement of the vegetated corridor will occur prior to or concurrent with proposed park improvements. Figure 6 shows the mitigation and enhancement areas. The areas proposed for enhancement adjacent to the proposed trail and bridge crossing consists of an overstory of red alder,with an understory comprised mostly of Himalayan blackberry. Table 6 lists native plants suitable for• installation throughout the vegetated corridor that may be used for the mitigation and enhancement areas. These species are appropriate to conditions in this area.A final planting plan will be submitted with final construction documents. Table 6. Suggested enhancement plantings Botanical Name Common Name Minimum rooting size* TREES Alma rubra Red alder 1 gallon SHRUBS Amelanchier alnifolia Western serviceberry 1 gallon Mahonia aquifolium Tall Oregon grape 1 gallon Polystichum munitum Sword fern 2 gallon Symphoricarpos albus Snowberry 1 gallon HERBACEOUS Bromus carinatus California brome 44 lbs/acre Elymus glaucus Blue wild-rye 40 lbs/acre *Bare root stock can be utilized in lieu of potted plants,using CWS'minimum plant height standards • Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. NRA for Proposed Jack Park Trail/PBS#4889 Page 12 • Appendix A Figures • PHS 5111 • ,i I . =1 j >_ o� i �ILL ; ) i�__' ,• 1 ',r- • �>, r �1\ i .F" c .;�. lii iJ� ,� r" : !'C'ravcarr Y. Project Location c . • if Y1 1 ' a �` -i �6 i�i A v �� I-,.- `--'yam . .ram' ,' :I �'s� f d I '/ /� I i ,-ro, eTft � \ •f 4 1017TK J 'C T' _ ,. , �_i,��(iA-- ..„.. . —''� • i/ . \.:r, '=_ l Ial� f \\ ..� ..• . i }'•• .'It Pry�4 i- ._ -' !• Tipp n ' ;�• .I .--. '•: / ) A 1f, • • i l -. i� / ". �' -,, cB I _ ti, .. • �a.r � • •5fW' 7C3Ah'Ci l i• II:-r�o`t+1 ld •/ -: t 11 /� fi t t ••. a 4 , . 1 .. . � f• .,_ r f • • M va' • • ,—/.• '' ~ t7' I ;fty•' ` 4. tl.1- fOfr • •.` .wi i1- (- / *itf .( t 3 / � \ // /• '• r r .f l ' - - I i n; • • • ktA 6 •, 1 � l l, fir.) % :d • / Y� r e`J :A� � ' ► tr� / / • � f• N _ � • � � • •��'• 1• ii ir'*4. 't I � _Et 1 •''' li ' . riga' g• V )� //r ' � / ,:al ' .r / I ��if+' f . . :Y'7TT. j Er _ _ • r ' y /i.` i' N1t114 , h (?/, F•, 7 • l- ••-, }• y'l . /2',f1 , � " I r I p ;, X ,'r) , � , „ i r1 /4�if i C� t � . � yry IJ N r p , * y •1 /• X.. IY if .• /:may( I r / • ,, a ail 1' I• ill.Ir�I r.1 —./ ,;F -' 3ii,I.V. IA untain '' , /•'" ` • .•- ly j / 3 r • " r . • I c..,ji 12/15/11 4889 Location and general topography for the Jack Park site in Tigard, Oregon (USGS FIGURE • Beaverton, OR quadrangle, 1961, photorevised 1984). A —Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. '.... PIANTCOMMINfhA(17.1635Fb 39 AC]OC4MDED CONDITION ). E'- 'PLANT COMMUNITY B(153565F1036 AC)MARGINAL CONDITION a( -'PLANT COMMUNITY C(L3917 SY/010 AC)DEGRADED CONDITION • •.. PLANT COMMUNITY D(19,627 S10A5 AC)DEGRADED CONDITION /I'. ♦♦ Ar E-�_PLANT COMMUNITY E(I3}635FL.3 I AC)MARGINAL CONDITION • TLC VEGETATION DATA POINT ♦♦1.1 A- M30TODOCUMENTATON POINT ♦ +SLOPE MEASUREMENT ♦♦ !• I. WETUMD DATA POINT / e_ . CREEK ROW DIRECTION i/ ( __ VEGETATED CORRIDOR BOUNDARY j UN �_.' WEI3AND5 • % o ♦♦ _ / 4' 4'9. / 21 • ♦♦♦ VEGETATED CORRIDOR- A BOUNDARY �- _ 1♦K�.� J O o F_ Sp PLANT ♦� COMMUNITY A—y s' (17,1(3 SF/0.39 AC) I , I / - OHW ♦ / 36 RRUEGER CREE / 4w. • -_ ,er • ♦♦ { PLANT COMMUNT'C ♦ ,�` ti~ '.. /sk _ _ (12,9775Ff0.30 AC).. MMMM 1 PLANT COMMUNITY B ■ G i- Z\o � � l ♦♦ • r PLANT COMMUNITY / �'� �, 1♦Y� 11 (13,6635F10.3I AC) 1 ✓ % J / WJETLANDD y' ,�'� Quo /i' ♦•p ESTIMATED BY PINS ON 553,I2 i Sp \b' / / • ),,,../.., c 55'TOTALi/.'. 9 •�v. S 6 -/ ♦1 ®o • l $ KRUEGER JN NF OF G ,5 )♦f. r----1 I II QF' ..�� \\ PLANT COMMUNITY D i y '- ) ( 3EATON 50 I weTLAND ( - —• 3 BOUNDARY 1 St*. >f' :1' I—DELINEATED BY PBS(SAL ( - -- 07-007K2) ■ sw9frlNiYliejJ�,♦ 6 no S.W. WALNUT STREET ALB IN PBFT • FIGURE Exis(ing condiLiw)s of Jock Pork in Tigard, Oregon. Survey and basemop provided asap 7 by Bluedo) Group, 2012. See Tree Pier on Figure 5. 726/12 Pacific Habits Services,Inc. ? ) YINUTCfABMN014113.SPa*WI IBIM IB ML4eIB.7/44'7P122ite eM1 4 Y ,.. s,s ,, fi Photo C tr.P ,a+• lk', ,y .1 . aifir,. , `7; " i fi '} !. �. i Photo was taken111/ .j 3 >t " ,,, . looking west at 14.'i ,., n r J, s,.. Wetland B and the 1 • ; ' ' ,f,, �l , .0- northern portion of .= ,, + ,.a Plant Community B. {_ -t b • !; 3'. i i• ', � yl, r u , w, •"I %, • • i., e Y tt'� 'IA' 1 • ::kefl lookin '' +llt' -m ' �r• southwest at Plant 1 "' t =s I t �� J i. ..' ` ; ..0. Community B and �_, , ,,, Krueger Creek. s ,, ° . ',. , f-.a ""+�'gaa ..V- *. R '• • + . ,r"^ 1 r \ 160 L^ } /G y / .lt� r'\ Ati i —7...f T�*�a. Project#4889 4/18/12 Photo documentation for Jack Park. Both photos taken December 7, 2011. FIGURE • 3B SPacific Habitat Services,Inc. • fn IK/{,1 +, _ 1 $ ♦ •Ai. i ' • Photo E f 'rI/' ' �I� 1+• t JlYk 1 r i„ems+ i0,' a. �:� .�.1„ Photo was taken ',�* . •" t' s !r • i1 n ^r�' .- looking northeast at r ?' 4 , . , '�• Wetland C and Plant ft r Q i. ,. Community C. ` - .Al t �d Y y Y y J ( .yam} �S I ' a e K ?4 F t Y.';'' r ''.' Y , 1' f 'rr •/ '" `. �: f Photo F • r . ': „ ' • Photo taken , L. ' • . '. d • looking northwest s, at the proposed . '' location of the bridge crossing, across plant communities C, Wetland C . i' . i t t 'R't r�� ' t�/ ,Pn R , 1pi , s _ n i ilr4' [1 { t e', ' 4 t t :( r ',44 n f ' V "._� 1.s # m ma .41, FIGURE • 4/18/12 Project#4889 Photo documentation for Jack Park. Both photos taken December 7, 2011. 3C ^ -.4.11 —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. • Photo G •j Photo was taken looking • south at Plant Community E. 1. c - pr '. • p't4 :y s• • ,.sue I flit0. elf --I. 1 F _ "ai]ro3 ky �, , 1. >.. Jar,'s iitit Yt 1 1 `' :'i^ Photo H ' •7 r ,"N., .+> • �,.w x ve Photo was taken looking Cats.'. z ,f',: rti..,• _" ""' . 't"' = r <- southeast at the interior of ; £ • ry F • 'F x Plant community E. ' • !°ss`f 'rY�.-M S 'AI a . � 'A j F ./ a ,.,,,ie .i A 'n: . v' Project#4889 4/18/12 Photo documentation for Jack Park. Both photos taken May 8, 2012 FIGURE 3D • 11 A —Pacific Habitat Services,Inc. PERMANENT IPMAC S WTNN TM!CATER NS Of TER VOIETARRO CORRIDOR ANOCAF•ACRE CROSSING OCf ACRE 1516 Y PERHANENiRMACTi WITHIN TNEINNEII kO%Oi THE VkGkTAtq CORRIDOR ♦♦♦ •• ME SEND ACRE • TRAIL OUTROS VEGETATED CORRIDOR .♦ 1ssi a*AGE TEMPORARY GRA NG OUTSIDE INETAT®CpNIDOR ♦1 ,'I011I NM H ACRE --\\ TEMrORARY GRADING INSIDE VEGETATIDOORRICO.. ♦♦♦ A••--� JAN Pali AGE ♦ 1•••♦♦+\ PwnHouwlusWALF ♦ Ae••' ..♦e• • ISM MAMA AGE ♦ ♦•�A e.. MN vkckrATEocouuroR �•♦�lea••• 4.1 e:Ij•♦.♦fie, / !T♦ /• e•1• e e•ee••♦e� e♦♦ee• ♦♦ VIGETATED COMIDOR �•�44•:44, ' ♦♦ SOUNDAFY 1♦e♦•11♦••••e� ��i _ ♦ `e••.11••♦♦ e 4 P i E---- 4D'60 VEGETATED I CORRIDOR OMIT i1 4 ♦i I Ar OH'N E KRUEGER CREEK i " =WM •4 4•440, _ •..... . ..,.. . .,..,...". ., Aep ♦♦e•e•e6e♦ 9 -1•• / ••••e•*1•e•eel , •s�w�,••� ♦?►�••e•ee•***..e :,.a ale•♦•/ •1 I ♦ s�♦a• • �•',,N.c•: e'��A' ��45►� e� ♦•••�e1e •••••.•.•,.�4,4* �, // / ' �. i�,$ K�e � ♦• •-- *` ei 1 r , ♦ ,�AYIREJYMATt :+` ♦ ..• 1 1 /0 it, TWIN ; � STATIONSD / I i ,)44.4 IV S 1 1 we.. R . _ TW S.W. WALNUT STREET __...__.._. .......__._.._._.._... T, OP, ',.td vOgeteiird crirridcir imposts at Jock t'a%K in Tiye';Id. Oreyon. Drslya 4689 b- I y t.0ilrri MSthaE1, Lrjrrdacoce Architect, 2O 2, 7/26/12 NOfGs HAW RrwirsF,Ina, 7 0;kirKe_wrMk✓,NAF9:WkPWA•r34/09 Week 9/AMP]i OM PM --- - ;_..:....' WETLAND AREA .�..w0.0, •• • GRADING AREA •• • OTREES TO REMAIN ,.f 0 • TREES TO BE REMOVED .♦0 0 00 ••• 4.44,4; 1 .s. 7 -------1-) 4.9.• • 4 - / _,. Y :Y1 _____, NNNNI Op ... • d ± v -7 el ♦ 1 = OHW ` KItUEGFiI C 141/4r • • '. " • Y} F .•• ° e _ Q O 0 'ram F if • • ,\ ♦-k J / • • • . f 7 / .. • \\\ • r ARRO%MATE / ..,/ \ CElirFAIINEQF • r �•. 1 \ a / ?• ems .4 _._ 1 _— - IvcsR / J ,4 SfAlIW150 IP Jr __—_-___ il.1 __ S.W. WALNUT STREET scnt.E III • FIGURE Tree plan at Jack °ark in "igard. Oregon. Design provided by Laura Herson +AR9 1--, Landscape Architect LLC, 2012_ 7/26/12 FWIE6bMMI4rr/YhbrWMrOMIW11A49,7/2(43012 210931 RI , ..., I-,•,,1 ENHANCEMENT AREA / 11 I 1H) P . • • :4.14,,,•4411:44714.:;'''''' MITIGATION AREA • t•INI4M VEGETATED CORRIDOR AREA I j WETLAND AREA •4 * *- I" 4101F/001 AC .4,•,.//3/4!E,,,,4`4,*, 4/ MITIGATION I rIt R.•II.41/• ' .4 R*/••,drr 4'Ve(4.1,:44.41••••44.i:,.' r • 4-4,,stAi•+• '• etv, ' 4 II*4.+•El 44.'4/.//' /Elk d Gay.+,41,44,4 1,:n A..4 /'• ,...wver4 jol.r.,4,16,* 1 , Aop.--, • , : tie Jr, • SIOSTATIO COMM • • SOUNDMY ••,, 4.4 . • A• I r AWS:4 te0 , ir el.. 4f4' filt• gel,.`la 4,• 4:40.4 '' - 14 4,7* ONPV LE P TREE 4004KA, 4014*,40.4 "141214 CANOPY "ZS VAN• 0 101:4 1•4444,4 41, - /....0. _______. __ _____ ••4:,,,,N jor i ,400 1 • , • .4. ..*.:,70 7 • •4w ..00. •,,,- _ 4 ihz- .• 0•46* *" •/4,-9 / Ail •fr / . 4, ,,..f,,, /e. • VEGETATED CORRIDOR * EAST OF KRUEGER CREEK 4/ 40 4le 4" 4 4 •• PREVIOUSLY ENHANCED / /<///// • • PER SP(07402442 • ' ''I///////0 4 ' / 4/7 •K. / // //// • rot /7/7/ /,, • 743 SFM.02 AC MITIGATION /,',.. / // ' /// ..• /./,. A99KORIMAE / / dr . 440/TNITONED/ // /2/ i• • /34 SEMAI AC.MITIGATION 1 I /4/ ,/, ,II ;/ ' -••'.4 - 4444.1 //'Z.// iill• 1 swAr.rA if. 0, 1 I [eoe 1 -r-- J..E.----r------47-P----j . SW WALNUT STREET ---- • 4K)./ 26/I. ROI1114 I IIIRIISI 1444wweti,hig *\61-114 1444#404#074 m4 rNewt4 fmmikow Nimwo Pain)/4"Of • Appendix G. Geotechnical Report • • Appendix G G-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25, 2012 • GEOTECHNICS r '629 SE Harrison Street I Portland,OR 97215 I 503-730-2469 January 24, 2012 Laura Herbon Landscape Architect LLC 6824 SE 21't Avenue Portland, Oregon 97202 Report of Geotechnical Services Jack Park Pedestrian Bridge 12420 SW 127th Avenue Tigard, Oregon Project No. 11-031-1 INTRODUCTION Geotechnics LLC is pleased to submit this geotechnical engineering report to support design of bridge foundations for a pedestrian bridge as part of the Jack Park Improvements Project in Tigard, Oregon. Our work was completed in general accordance with the authorized subcontract dated December 1, 2011. The site location is indicated on attached Figure 1. • The existing Jack Park occupies the north side of Krueger Creek. Recent property acquisition will expand the park to the south side of the creek The Jack Park Improvements project involves the aforementioned bridge as well as associated pathways and other landscape improvements. A recently completed Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue (TVF&R) facility borders the south side of the side,just upslope from the proposed bridge. Explorations for this Ere station project were presented in a 2007 geotechnical report by Carlson Geotechnical and were used to supplement the current study. The following report provides our geotechnical evaluation of the bridge site, including our findings, conclusions, and geotechnical engineering design recommendations. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed pedestrian bridge will span Krueger Creek and its associated wetlands. We understand a prefabricated bridge will be placed with a single span on the order of 100 feet in length. Bridge width will be approximately 6 feet. We understand axial loads at each abutment will be on the order of 40 kips. Tension and lateral forces are anticipated to be very minimal. The approximate proposed bridge alignment is shown on the attached Site Plan,Figure 2. Krueger Creek flows northeast within a well-defined,approximately 6-to 8-foot wide incised channel. The base of the creek is about 4 vertical feet from the top of the bank, and at the time of our reconnaissance(December 12),water depth was 6 to 12 inches. Above the bank is a broad floodplain with elevation generally between 211 and 212 feet. The floodplain is approximately 90 feet in width with about two-thirds of this width on the north side of the creek The floodplain is bordered on the south by an approximately 2.5H:IV (horizontal:vertical) slope and on the north by an approximately 5H:IV slope. The bridge foundations will be built into these slopes. • Jack Park Bridge. Tigard OR GEOTECHNICS LLC • DOCUMENT REVIEW GEOLOGIC AND SOILS MAPPING The site geology is mapped in the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) Bulletin 60 (Schlicker and Deacon, 1967). The map shows the site area underlain by Quaternary-age Willamette Silt. These soils are described as unconsolidated beds and lenses of fine sand, silt, and clay. Geologic mapping of the area is also presented in DOGAMI Open File Report 0-90-2 (Marlin, 1990). Madin maps site soils as fine grained flood deposits with a thickness of greater than 40 feet. Madin describes these soils as "fine grained sediments deposited by late Quaternary catastrophic floods". Soils at the site are mapped by the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon (Green, 1982). The soils mapped on site are Delena silt loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes(Unit 16C). Unit 16C soils tend to be silty to clayey, with very slow permeability, and are reported to display slow to medium runoff and slight to moderate erosion hazard. We additionally reviewed Landslide Inventory Maps of the Beaverton Quadrangle (Burns et. al, 2011). These recent maps use LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) imagery to map landslides throughout the Beaverton Quadrangle. This mapping shows no landslides on the property or within the near vicinity of the site. TVF&R GEOTECHNICAL REPORT We requested and received the geotechnical report prepared for the new fire station bordering the site to the south of the proposed bridge (Carlson, 2007). Their exploration program included 3 hollow- stem-auger borings and one Cone Penetrometer sounding(CPT). Maximum boring depth(boring B-1) was 51.5 feet and the depth of CPT-1 was 71 feet. Laboratory testing was performed on samples from boring B-1 and included Atterberg Limits and Percent Fines testing. Near surface soils encountered were described as soft to medium stiff sandy silt. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 12 to 13 feet below ground surface (bgs). We have attached copies of the logs for B-1 and CPT-1 which we selected to supplement our own data. Approximate locations of these explorations are shown on Figure 2. Among the Carlson conclusions was that near surface soft to medium stiff silt soils could support an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf with resulting settlement of less than one inch provided the upper 16 inches is removed and replaced with compacted crushed rock Carlson also evaluated liquefaction and concluded that approximately 3 inches of liquefaction-induced ground surface settlement could result from a Magnitude 7 earthquake having a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.33g. EXPLORATIONS We completed field explorations at the site on January 4, 2012. Our explorations consisted of two hand auger borings to depths of 11 and 12 feet bgs and two dynamic cone penetrometers (DCP) to depths of 15'/z and 16V2 feet bgs. The dynamic cone provides an equivalent blow count, or 'N-value', for estimation of consistency and pile penetration resistance. The explorations were completed at the proposed north and south bridge abutments and the approximate locations are shown on Figure 2. The logs of the explorations are included as Figures Al through A4. Samples were collected from the • File 11-031-1 January 24, 2012 Page 2 of 9 Jack Park Bridge,Tigard, OR GEOTECHNICS L L c • hand-auger borings and returned to our soils laboratory for further examination and testing. The results of our laboratory tests are included on the boring logs and on Figure A5. In general, our findings were consistent with the conditions described by the geologic mapping. Soft to medium stiff silt and clay were encountered in both borings. On the south side. these materials were very similar silts to those encountered by Carlson Geotechnical on the neighboring site. On the north side, materials were clavier and a hard layer, TA to 3 ft thick, was encountered at about 71/2 ft bgs. On the south side, a 4%-foot layer of soft silt fill was encountered overlying the native silt deposits. Equivalent N-values from the DCP's within the primary footing-influence zone on the south were 4 blows per foot(bpf)and on the north 6 bpf. Shallow groundwater was encountered in both hand auger borings at a depth of about 3''A to 4 ft bgs, corresponding to Elevation 211 ft. Based on findings from the Carlson study as well as review of well logs from the surrounding area, this level likely represents the regional water table. This water table can be expected to vary seasonally and may rise higher than Elevation 211 during prolonged wet periods. Our explorations were performed during the rainy season but not during a prolonged wet period. Logs of prior Carlson explorations are included as Figures A6 and A7 and their locations are also shown on Figure 2. Carlson's Atterberg Lining test results are shown graphically on Figure A5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATION SUPPORT • Shallow Foundations: The bridge foundations can be supported on spread footings embedded a minimum of 3 feet below ground surface. Due to the soft soils encountered and based on our settlement estimates, overexcavation of 18 inches will be required to mitigate settlement. Thus, foundation excavations should extend to 4'/z feet below grade. These excavations should also extend outward 6 inches beyond the footing edge on all sides. The slope-side bottom edge of abutment footings should have a minimum horizontal offset of 5 feet from the slope face. Overexcavated soils should be replaced with compacted crushed rock Crushed rock material and compaction requirements are specified below in the Earthworks section of this report. Replacement crushed rock should be underlain by a geotextile separator consisting of a medium strength woven fabric such as Mirafi 500X or approved equivalent. Foundations as described above should be proportioned for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 1,250 pounds per square foot (psi). This bearing pressure applies to the total of dead and long-term live loads and may be increased by one-third when considering earthquake or wind loads. This is a net bearing pressure. The weight of the footing and overlying backfill can be ignored in calculating footing sizes. We expect that spread foundations designed and constructed as recommended will experience settlements of less than 1-inch. Differential settlements of up to one-half of the total settlement magnitude can be expected. Lateral loads on footings can be resisted by passive earth pressure on the sides of footings and by friction on the bearing surface. We recommend that passive earth pressures be calculated using an equivalent unit weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot(pcf). We recommend using a friction coefficient File 11-031-1 January 24,2012 Page 3 of 9 Jack Park Bridge, Tigard, OR GEOTECHNICS Li.0 • of 0.5 between the base of the footing and the compacted crushed rock. The passive earth pressure and friction components may be combined provided that the passive component does not exceed two- thirds of the total. Passive resistance should be reduced by the following factors on the downslope side based on slope inclination: • 3H:1V: 44% • 4H:1V: 35% • 5H:1V: 28% Helical Anchor Foundations: If the required size and depth of shallow foundations are too great, bridge abutments can alternatively consist of a pile cap supported by helical anchors. Pile caps should have a minimum depth of 2 feet bgs and a minimum width of 2 feet. Based on the anticipated abutment load of approximately 40 kips and foundation length of about 8 feet, a single row of two to four anchors will be possible. Our analyses indicate a required minimum embedment of 15 feet below the base of the pile cap. Multiple helices will be required to resist the anticipated loading. We recommend any of the following helix configurations and allowable loads: Helical Anchor Design Recommendations Helix Configuration Allowable Load (lops) Minimum Spacing(ft) 8"/10" 8 2.5 8"J10"112" 14 3.0 10712714 20 3.5 •, We expect that helical anchor foundations designed and constructed as recommended will experience settlements of less than 1-inch. Differential settlements of up to one-half of the total settlement magnitude can be expected. Lateral loading should be accommodated by passive resistance as specified above for shallow foundations. Alternatively, battered anchors could be in to resist lateral loads. For helical anchor supported foundations, we cannot rely on any lateral resistance from friction between the base of the pile cap and the underlying soil. Load testing should be performed, with one test at each abutment. Helical anchor installation should be observed by the geotechnical engineer to confirm required levels of torque. Geotechnics LLC should also be retained to review specifications related to anchor installation and testing. Slope Stability: We analyzed slope stability using the modeling program Slope/W by Geo-Slope International,Ltd. The abutment foundations will be built into ascending slopes having inclinations of 5H:1V to 2.5H:IV (approximately 11 to 22 degrees from horizontal). Our analyses indicate that slopes in the vicinity of proposed foundations are stable for both static and seismic conditions. Since foundation support will be at or very near the base of the slopes, the proposed improvements will have no adverse effect on slope stability. • File 11-031-1 January 24,2012 Page 4 of 9 Jack Park Bridge,Tigard, OR GEOTECHNICS • Our conclusions regarding stability and passive resistance are based on the assumption that foundation embedment will be maintained throughout the life of the project. We assume the bridge abutments will not be subject to scour. If the bridge will be subject to scour, scour protection such as slope armoring will be specified by others. Evaluation of scour is beyond the scope of our study but,upon request we can provide soil parameters for scour analyses. RETAINING WALLS We understand the pedestrian path in the vicinity of abutments may require retaining walls. For low- height walls retaining cut slopes, gravity walls will be the most economically feasible choice. These would include rockery walls or other gravity systems such as ecology block or Ultrablock® systems. We recommend such walls be limited in height to 8 feet and be designed with a batter no steeper than 1H:4V. To retain fills on the descending slope, MSE(Mechanically Stabilized Earth)walls will be the logical choice with facing usually consisting of concrete modular units such as Keystone® blocks. Ultrablock® systems can also be designed as MSE walls. Conventional concrete cantilever walls cannot be ruled out, but in this environment are less desirable due to their rigidity and relative sensitivity to soil settlement. Design details will depend on the wall system selected. For use in wall design, we recommend the following soil parameters for in-place site soils: • Angle of internal friction, 9:28° • Cohesion,c: 0 • Wet unit weight yw: 115 pcf . • Active pressure,equiv. fluid wt.: 40 pcf. Note that the above recommendations assume level backfill behind the wall and a drainage system to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressures. Geotechnics LLC is available to perform design of MSE or gravity retaining walls. If designed by others, Geotechnics should be provided the opportunity to review calculations and drawings to verify that valid assumptions were made relative to material properties and other factors. SEISMIC HAZARDS Liquefaction: As noted, Carlson Geotechnical predicted approximately 3 inches of liquefaction induced ground surface settlement from the design earthquake (Magnitude 7 earthquake with peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.33g). The settlement is attributed to non-plastic or low plasticity sandy silts below the water table. We concur that this is a reasonable settlement estimate given the available data and this amount of settlement can be extrapolated to the bridge site, whether shallow foundations or helical anchors are used. The bridge should be designed to accommodate 3 inches of differential settlement between the two abutments without collapse. In our experience, design to prevent all damage caused by liquefaction-induced settlement of this magnitude is rarely cost effective for this size project and where temporary disruption of service(for repairs) is feasible. In our opinion, the cost of mitigating against liquefaction(possibly 50-foot deep driven piles)would far outweigh the cost of required foundation repairs following the earthquake. Slope Stability and Lateral Spreading_ The potential for seismic slope instability has been addressed above. Based on our seismic limit-equilibrium analyses, the site slopes in the vicinity of the bridge 41111 File 11-031-1 January 24, 2012 Page 5 of 9 Jack Park Bridge, Tigard, OR GEOTECHNICS LLC will remain stable under the design earthquake. Liquefaction-induced lateral spreading occurs on slopes underlain generally by loose sands and shallow groundwater. Based on the silty and clayey materials encountered near surface, and the level of the groundwater table with respect to the free face (creek bank),we consider the potential for lateral spreading at this site to be minimal to none. Fault Surface Rupture: Faults have not been mapped within the boundaries of the site or adjacent properties (USGS, 2006). No indications of the presence of faulting were noted during our field investigation. We consider the possibility of fault rupture and displacement at this site to be remote. Ground Shaking: We assume seismic design of bridges will be performed in accordance with the 2009 International Building Code and/or AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Appropriate levels of ground acceleration and other parameters for the basis of design can be taken from the USGS Earthquake Hazards website using a Site Class of D. EARTHWORKS Wet Weather Construction: The silty soils at the site can be expected to become easily disturbed during periods of wet weather or when the moisture content of the material is more than a few percentage points above optimum. This will likely be the case in all but mid-summer through early fall. When wet, the on-site soils are susceptible to disturbance and generally will provide inadequate support for construction equipment. We recommend earthwork be scheduled for dry summer months, if possible. If earthwork is scheduled for the wet season or significant precipitation occurs during construction,special techniques may be needed to minimize disturbance to the subgrade from construction traffic when wet. A • temporary working pad constructed of 12 to 24 inches or more of crushed rock over a geotextile fabric might be needed where traffic occurs. Slopes should be protected and stability under wet conditions should be verified. Excavation: Site soils within expected excavation depths should consist predominantly of soft to medium stiff silt to clay. It is our opinion that conventional earthmoving equipment in proper working condition should be capable of making necessary general excavations for footings and other earthwork, although low impact tracked equipment may be required to minimize site disturbance. The earthwork contractor is responsible to provide equipment and procedures to excavate the site soils described in the exploration logs and text of this report. Dewatering: Groundwater is not likely to occur within the depths of expected excavations during the dry season. During the wet season, groundwater seepage is possible. Excavations that extend into saturated soils should be dewatered. If groundwater is encountered,sump pumps placed in the excavations should be sufficient for dewatering the silty and clayey soils. In addition to groundwater seepage, surface water inflow to the excavations during the wet season could be problematic. Provisions for temporary surface water control should be included in the project plans and should be installed prior to commencing work. File 11-031-1 January 24,2012 Page 6 of 9 • • Jack Park Bridge,Tigard, OR GEOTECHNICS Temporary Excavations: Excavation sidewalls should stand near-vertical to a depth of at least 4 feet, provided perched or near-surface groundwater seepage does not affect the sidewalls. Excavations made to construct footings or other structural elements should be laid back at the surface as necessary to prevent soil from falling into excavations. All excavations should be made in accordance with applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA) and state regulations. Site soils are generally OSHA Type B. Fill Materials and Compaction: Imported structural fill materials will be required as replacement material for foundation overexcavations. Structural fill should consist of clean, durable, crushed angular rock. Such rock should be well-graded and have a maximum particle size of 1'/A inches,and less than 5 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve. The material should be placed and compacted in lifts not exceeding 9 inches in uncompacted thicknesses and to a minimum of 95 percent of maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D1557. Surface Drainage and Erosion Control: Surface runoff can be controlled during construction by careful grading practices. Typically, these include the construction of shallow, upgrade perimeter ditches or low earthen berms and the use of temporary sumps to collect runoff and prevent water from damaging exposed subgrades. Also, measures should be taken to avoid ponding of surface water during construction. • Permanent control of surface water should be incorporated in the final grading design. Adequate surface gradients and drainage systems should be incorporated into the design such that surface runoff is directed away from structures and into swales or other controlled drainage devices. Some site soils may present a moderate erosion hazard. In our opinion, erosion at the site during construction can be minimized by judicious use of straw bales, silt fences and plastic sheets. The erosion control devices should be in place and remain in place throughout site preparation and construction Maintaining appropriate erosion control is the responsibility of the contractor and should be carried out in accordance with the project plans and specifications and applicable regulations. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS Satisfactory foundation and earthwork performance depends to a large degree on quality of construction. Sufficient monitoring of the contractor's activities is a key part of determining that the work is completed in accordance with the construction drawings and specifications. Subsurface conditions observed during construction should be compared with those encountered during the exploration program. Recognition of changed conditions often requires experience; therefore, the project geotechnical engineer or their representative should visit the site with sufficient frequency to detect whether subsurface conditions change significantly from those anticipated. The geotechnical engineer of record should be retained to evaluate footing excavations and, if helical anchors are used, should provide oversight of installation and load testing. • File 11-031-1 January 24,2012 Page 7 of 9 Jack Park Bridge, Tigard, OR GEOTECHNICS LLC • LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the exclusive use of Laura Herbon Landscape Architect LLC and their authorized agents. Our work was completed in general accordance with our subcontract dated December 1, 2011. Our report is intended to provide our opinion of geotechnical parameters for design and construction of the proposed project based on exploration locations that are believed to be representative of site conditions. However, conditions can vary significantly between exploration locations and our conclusions should not be construed as a warranty or guarantee of subsurface conditions or future site performance. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the field of geotechnical engineering in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty, expressed or implied, should be understood. CLOSING We appreciate the opportunity to submit this report to you. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, teo PR aces 4�GIN �r OREgpM 'y 16 tic. R0DAVID* EXPIRE&: 12/31f 12_ Andre D. Mare, P.E.,G.E. Geotechnical Engineer Document ID: 11-031-1Ltrl Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site Plan Figure Al: Boring Log HA-1 Figure A2: DCP Log DCP-1 Figure A3: Boring Log HA-2 Figure A4: DCP Log DCP-2 Figure A5: Atterberg Limits Figure A6: Carlson Boring Log B-1 Figure A7: Carlson CPT Log CPT-1 • File 11-031-1 January 24,2012 Page 8 of 9 • Jack Park Bridge, Tigard, OR GEOTECHNICS!LC REFERENCES Burns. W.J., Madin, I.P., and Mickelson, K.A., 2011, Landslide Inventory Maps of the Beaverton Quadrangle, Washington County, Oregon, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, IMS-34,map scale 1:8,000. Carlson Geotechnical,Report of Geotechnical Investigation and Site-Specific Seismic Hazards Study. Tigard Fire Station, 12585 SW Walnut Street, Tigard, Oregon, consultant report dated January 9, 2007. Green, G.L., 1982, Soil Survey of Washington County, Oregon, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service,90 p., 27 plates. International Code Council,2009,2009 International Building Code. Madin I.P., 1990, Earthquake Hazard Geology Maps of the Portland Metropolitan Area, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report 0-90-2, 21 p., 8 maps, 1:24,000. Schlicker, H.G. and Deacon, RJ., 1967, Engineering Geology of the Tualatin Valley Region, Oregon, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Bulletin 60, 103p., 4 plates, 1:48,000. U.S. Geological Survey, 2006, Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, accessed from USGS web site:http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/gfaults/. • 411 File 11-031-1 January 24, 2012 Page 9 of 9 r 1 µ :3i 4 k +w fr l j`... SStiiTfBOI) `,_ ta0 . 'I) ° -_. ! ". rib *N tom'- b � x Y 11 ,�' yT Y,� � x • \tut f '_ e H ofeQf)• es ( .1 t r �n -X' g �} .� _.may ay.Y'b v A I S e _ CP 7 1./" am-,.-,; /t' -^.`•'^.q rtf`�a `5* y�� .•'sf x}� tl _ vf l4 i .. Ci e �t •. a 1I.!, Eu � �ri- r '•`- F �• _, �*.< ._ a sw4 kt7vzr}�' paieRl�P ' �� z'� <.;„�,! ) ;;/ �} 7� I r x 4. •ss.-.-. ` "2 it l ( T yy ; �ry j; i -at, ✓ r t„„„,,,,,,,,,��{ srs.J I;''e ' .. �'' fit ,tF-ti . ',�yam�(i[ :TF2' , , \y,✓ , , 7a♦ _ _d r,,. 1kt A A. y�;aT" 'de. f.'� i ,.4 t•x T �}j ." t•4 y J �, - .. h.. , w ;, - y p t 4 • )• •- � V, f �ir�s ,ry{ y' ?m x Sly '. e ' , -... •'4 w y Y ` 1 I t r a�. . _ ' f P zOGE 66 � ,i- '1' � t +1 h -'"."it 'N cl w tT_ .l rw 0 T fi'S y — „ v , C•: \ m of iI �I[ _ , ti .'3 u 4 1 NI • l e-in,2) '1 { 1 ".' '� \ 'l ♦ zi. sue A.. c� 7 I" •�' "'' »° �'�.� . ` f N NOT TO SCALE ft Base Map from USGS Beaverton 7.5 Minute Quadrangle. VICINITY MAP CEQTECHNICS Jack Park Expansion il Tigard, Oregon Project No 1 I-031-1 Figure 1 AN Iv V / � l i /� r �" B . Lit tion '''' / � � ti r' f , , ..aggio0V o,/ . ao o¢ 1 / ` APPROXIMATE '`eJ F IN FEET 40 / 'X'': 11..r iJV.W ��'� S' TC 236.20 r r f • ,..r 1° .."I 111.1f'AWL _ll s ' > 1. iligIII r. on LEGEND Imo_ Y Hand Auger Boring Location and Designation,Geotechnics B.1 A F TC HA-2 CP7•1 ;1 ST PAR A Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Location and Designation,Geotechnics DCP-2 • Boring Location and Designation,Carlson B-t 11. Cone Penetrometer Location and Designation,Carlson L CPT-1 SITE PLAN • GEOTECHNICS tic Jack Park Expansion Tigard, Oregon Project No. 11-031-1 Figure 2 DRILLING COMPANY: Geotechnics SURFACE ELEVATION: 215.0 Feet • DRILLING METHOD: Hand Took DATE STARTED: 1-4-12 DRILLING EQUIPMENT: Hand Auger DATE COMPLETER 1-4-12 BORING LOCATION: See Figure 2 LOGGED BY: ADM J 0 p it rp �' �i = u_ t kM x x o. i MATERIAL DESCRIPTION OTHER TESTS&NOTES < < < O O 5.11 W c an v, 6n f W m o u i ! Brown SILT(ML),very soft, moist. (TOPSOIL) Light brown CLAY(CH),soft,moist, moderate to high plasticity. Some reddish brown 5-1 Grab 11 27.3 mottling. ;.i —2—;.,. At 1.5 ft,becomes medium stiff. 5-2 Grab 11 34.5 —3— i S-3 Grab U 36.8 Fines Content=97% —4—,, At 4 ft, becomes grayish brown with reddish brown mottling. —5 - At 4.5 ft,groundwater seepage. S-4 Grab U 37.8 ! —7 •At 7 ft,, becomes soft. • s-s Grab 11 56.2 , Dark blue-gray CLAY(CL),very stiff to hard, very moist,moderate plasticity. • 5-6 Grab U 47.2 Fines Content=98% —10— At 10 ft, becomes dark grayish brown,medium 5-7 Grab 46.1 , stiff, high plasticity,slight organic odor. At 10.5 ft,blue-gray as above, moderate • plasticity. •3 3 i S-8 Grab U 52.8 Total Depth = 12 ft. Groundwater encountered at 4'6", rising in —13— boring to 3'9". See Figure A2(DCP-1)for blow counts. g —14— H NOTES: Page 1 U BORING HA-1 GEOTECHNI Cs ,- Jack Park Expansion Tigard,Oregon Project Number 11-031-1 Figure Al • WILDCAT DYNAMIC CONE LOG • Geotechnics LLC 7629 SE Harrison St PROJECT NUMBER: 11-031-1 Portland,OR 97215 DATE STARTED: 01-04-2012 DATE COMPLETED: 01-04-2012 HOLE 0: DCP-1 CREW: ADM SURFACE ELEVATION: 215.0 ft PROJECT: Jack Park Pedestrian Bridge WATER.ON COMPLETION: none ADDRESS: 12617 SW Walnut Si,Tigard.OR HAMMER WEIGHT: 35 lbs. LOCATION: Adjacent boring HA-1.north side of creek CONE AREA: 10 sq.an BLOWS RESISTANCE GRAPH OF CONE RESISTANCE TESTED CONSISTENCY DEPTH PER IOcm K2/cm' 0 50 100 150 N' SAND&SILT CLAY - 0 0.0 0 VERY LOOSE VERY SOFT • 0 0.0 0 VERY LOOSE VERY SOFT 1 ft 2 8.9 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 4 17.8 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 4 17.8 ••••• 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 2 ft 4 17.8 5 LOOSE MEDIUM.STIFF 4 17.8 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 6 26.6 7 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 3 ft 7 3L1 ••••••••• 8 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - I in 5 22.2 -••••• 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 5 19.3 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 4 ti 5 19.3 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 6 23.2 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 7 27.0 •^-•-• 7 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 5 ft 8 30.9 8 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 7 27.0 ••••••• 7 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 6 23.2 •••••• 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 6 ft 7 27.0 7 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 7 27.0 ••••••• 7 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 2 in 6 23.2 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 7 ft 5 17.1 •••• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT • 4 13_7 +•• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - I 37.6 ^•••^••• 10 LOOSE STIFF 8 ft30 102.6 -•-•••••-+• MEDIUM DENSE VERY STIFF 44 150.5 ••• - DENSE HARD - 33 112.9 - DENSE HARD 9 ft 28 95.8 •••••••••••••-••••••••••••• - MEDIUM DENSE VERY STIFF 23 78.7 22 MEDIUM DENSE VERY STIFF 35 119.7 - DENSE HARD - 3 m 1011 25 85.5 24 MEDIUM DENSE VERY STIFF - 20 61.2 ••••^•••••---••• I7 MEDIUM DENSE VERY STIFF 6 18.4 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 3 9.2 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT I I ft 2 6.1 i = VERY LOOSE VERY SOFT - 10 30.6 8 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 13 39.8 ••••»••••• 11 MEDIUM DENSE STIFF - 12 ft 12 36.7 10 LOOSE STIFF - S 24.5 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 7 21.4 •••••• 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 4 in 13 ft 21A •••••• 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 9 24.9 ••••••• 7 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 14 38,8 I 1 MEDIUM DENSE STIFF 14 tt 1 I 30S 8 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 14 38.8 •••••••••••• 11 MEDIUM DENSE STIFF - 9 24.9 7 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF I5 ft 7 19.4 •••••• 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 8 22.2 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 8 22.2 ••••••• 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 16 It 7 19.4 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 5 in 5 13.9 ••••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT DYNAMIC CONE LOG DCP-I • GEOTECHNICS= , -. Jack Park Expansion ' ` Tigard, Oregon Project No. 11-031-1 Figure A2 DRILLING COMPANY: Geotechnics SURFACE ELEVATION: 215.3 Feet . DRILLING METHOD: Hand Tools DATE STARTED: 1-4-12 DRILLING EQUIPMENT: Hand Auger DATE COMPLETED: 1-4-12 BORING LOCATION: See Figure 2 LOGGED BY: ADM J 0 m uJ f a S J J Je. N V1 = f VI z y g MATERIAL DESCRIPTION OTHER TESTS&NOTES O an vai vai Z V m 41 0 I Medium to dark brown SILT(ML),soft, moist. '� Rootlets. (TOPSOIL) Light reddish brown SILT(ML),soft, moist to — 1— very moist,low plasticity. Occasional wood fragments. (FILL) —2— i1i 5-1 Grab 111 36.2 I ; , —3 At 3 ft, buried horsetail plants,scattered dark brown mottling. 5-2 Grab 11 39.3 1 IFines Content=90% —4— I 5-3 Crab U 39.9 I Light yellowish brown SILT with sand(ML),soft —5— ' to medium stiff,wet. Mottled gray and reddish brown. I I Groundwater seepage at 4.5 feet. —6— ! 1 At 6 ft, becomes tan,no mottling. I 5-4 Grab II 35.1 I Fines Content-80% • 5-5 Crab U 35.8 —a— III —9 I I —10— �I 5-6 Crab11] 36.8 1 —11 - Total Depth- 11 ft. Groundwater encountered at 4'6". 1 —12— See Figure A4(DCP-2)for blow counts. i' 7 5 -13- a k —14— s p NOTES: Page 1 u BORING HA-2 GEOTECHN I CS. f Jack Park Expansion Tigard,Oregon Am Project Number I1-031-1 Figure A3 r 1 • WILDCAT DYNAMIC CONE LOG Geotechnies LLC 7629 SE Harrison Si PROJECT NUMBER: 11-03 I-I Portland,OR 97215 DATE STARTED: 01-04-2012 DATE COMPLETED: 01-04-2012 HOLE 8: DCP-2 CREW: ADM SURFACE ELEVATION: 215.3 ft PROJECT: Jack Park Pedestrian Bridge WATER.ON COMPLETION. none ADDRESS: 12617 SW Walnut St,Tigard.OR HAMMER WEIGHT: 35 lbs. LOCATION: Adjacent boring ILA-2.south side of creek CONE.AREA: IO sq.cm BLOWS RESISTANCE GRAPH OF CONE RESISTANCE TESTED CONSISTENCY DEPTH PER 1 U cm Ke cm' ,0 50 100 150 N' SAND&SILT CLAY - 2 8.9 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 2 8.9 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT I ft 4 17.8 5 LWSE MEDIUM STIFF - 3 13.3 ••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 3 13.3 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 2 ft 2 R.9 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 2 8.9 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 3 13.3 ••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT 3 ft 3 13.3 •-• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - I m 2 8.9 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 3 11.6 ••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT 4 ft 3 11.6 --• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 3 11.6 ••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 3 11.6 •-• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT 5 ft 5 19.3 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 3 11.6 ••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 4 15.4 •••• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT 611 5 19.3 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 6 23.2 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 2 m 4 15.4 •••• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT 711 4 13.7 •-• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT • - 3 10.3 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT 5 17.1 4 VERY LOOSESOFT 8 ft 4 13.7 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT 4 13.7 ••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 5 17.1 •••• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT 9 ft 7 23.9 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 7 23.9 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 4 13.7 ••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 3 m 10 ft 3 10.3 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 6 18.4 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 5 15.3 •••• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 6 18.4 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF 11 ft 5 15.3 ^•• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 5 15.3 •••• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 5 15.3 •••• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT 12 ft 4 12.2 ••• 3 VERY LOOSE SOFT 6 18.4 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 7 21.4 6 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 4 m 13 ft 11 33.7 9 LOOSE STIFF 12 33.2 9 LOOSE STIFF - 7 19.4 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 14 ft 3 8.3 -• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 3 8.3 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 2 5.5 I VERY LOOSE VERY SOFT 15 ft 3 8.3 •• 2 VERY LOOSE SOFT - 7 19.4 5 LOOSE MEDIUM STIFF - 6 16.6 •••• 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT 16ft DYNAMIC CONE LOG DCP-2 • GEOTECHNICSvc Jack Park Expansion Tigard, Oregon Project No. 11-031-1 Figure A4 r 60 50 CH 40 X n ■ x 30 is MH or OH 2` 20 a Ct 6 10 Cl.-ML 1 0 Mt or OL O 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Liquid Limit-LL(%) Symbol Sample Depth(ft) Soil Description %MC LL PL PI %Fines Geotechnics: • HA-1 S-3 3.5-4.0 FAT CLAY(CH) 37 58 25 33 97 ♦ HA-2 S-4 6.5-7.0 SILT WITH SAND(ML) 35 35 28 7 80 Carlson: ❑ B-1 SS-4 7.5-9.0 SANDY SILT(ML) 35 35 27 8 70 0 B-1 SS-8 20.21.5 SILT WITH SAND(ML) 27 31 27 4 84 PLASTICITY CHART Atterberg Limits determined in I rJEOTFCHIVICS; Jack Park Expansion accordance with ASTM D 4318 Tigard,Oregon Project No. 11-031-1 Figure A5 Carlson Geotechnical FIGURE 5 III vP 7165 SWO Sandberg Street,Suite 110 Tigard,OR 97223 BORING NUMBER B-1 Telephone: (503)601-8250 SW Fax: (503)801-8254 PAGE 1 OF 2 CLIENT Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue PROJECT NAME Tigard Fire Station . PROJECT NUMBER G0602953 PROJECT LOCATION 12585 SW Walnut Street __ DATE STARTED 11/27/06 ELEVATION DATUM Driveway at Walnut Street= 100 ft DRILLING CONTRACTOR Subsurface Technologies GROUND ELEVATION 96 ft DRILLING METHOD HSA GROUND WATER LEVELS: LOGGED BY M.David Irish CHECKED BY Ryan Houser AT TIME OF DRILLING 13.0 ft/Elev 83.0 ft NOTES TAT END OF DRILLING 12.0 ft/Elev 84.0 It W ATTERBERG z a Woe LIMITS = T `ii o °� Y w uza3 - j'-' r- f-"_ gg p r? MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Q- W g 0 J O< z a s W o F- tU---F-- O g O ae ov a ' y �v a� 0 m0> SCrJ�c J 3z �� F o m 0 j W z Ov O o 2� C� a� gz z 0 : a a —-, OL Soft,moist,brown,SILT TOPSOIL,contains rootlets^ SPT 1-1-2 - - Soft to medium stiff,moist,brown,SILT 95 SS-1 100 (3) - _ . - ML - _ SPT Becomes medium stiff at 3 feet bgs ASS SS-2 87 2(5)3_ Medium stiff,very moist.brown,SANDY SILT 5 90 SPT 100 35 35 63 - - �SS-3 (5) • - SS-0 100 1-1-2 35 27 8 10 �,. Becomes soft at 10 feet bgs. i --I Becomes 85 SPT 100 1"1'1 1 36 I.. 74 - - SS-5 (2) i . - - - - Becomes wet at 12 feet bgs i - - SPT 1-1-1 - _ X SS-6 100 (2) � 36 I F - �V' - - 80 ASS-7 10[I SPT 1(2)1 - 36 I., 83 • / ` ) - - ML - - s oo oi 20 1- - 75 X S� 100 0-1-1 27 31 27 4 84 a / � o_ - is m' z 25 8' Becomes medium stiff and brown/grey at 25 feet bgs 70 SPT 100 0-2-4 39 53 SS 9 (6) m �- - - - w 0 II. • O g (Continued Next Page) Figure A6a Carlson Geotechnical FIGURE 5 G• �� 7185 SW Sandberg Street,Suite 110 _ • Tigard,OR 97223 BORING NUMBER B-1 S034014250 Telephone: (503)601-8250 Fax: (503)601-8254 PAGE 2 OF 2 CLIENT Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue PROJECT NAME Tigard Fire Station PROJECT NUMBER G0602953 PROJECT LOCATION 12585 SW Walnut Street ATTERBERG z z a z X LIMITS 2 O �tY > NW III O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ct c a j Qp m O 2! 41 y; z our g f- Fv--t_ 56 v a D Jv z U Uz 0 Yv Oz p. _ i'o rn 0 w �d m ¢ sO J ' � z rn iL O o. Z 30 Soft,wet,brown,SANDY SILT(continued) 65 S d 100 0(1-1 27 81 35 _Becomes medium stiff and grey at 35 feet bgs 60 X SPT 100 2 3 35 82 SS-1 t - - ML - - 40 55 SPT 100 0-2-3 34 83 - SS-12 (5) _ J - 45 - 50 XSS-13 100 1-2-2 !! .32 .Qg - - Medium stiff,wet,grey/brown,LEAN CLAY _ _ 50- � CL \J PT- 45 X6S 67 2(6� �. 35 S1- 73 8 Boring terminated at 51.5 feet bgs. W s - Groundwater initially encountered at 13 feet bgs. o Groundwater at 12 feet bgs at completion of drilling. 1.2 e Boring bads-filed with bentonite. D I-- . v 0. 1 m O V 0 gS N O w 0_ LL O 1 I -- III - Figure A6b al • O,A� 0+ Carlson 7185 SWG Sandburgeotechnk Street,Suite 110 Figure 8 MAITITTigard,OR 97223 CPT NUMBER CPT-1+ Telephone: (503)801 8250 7607.82 Fax: (503)601-8254 PAGE 1 OF 3 CLIENT Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue PROJECT NAME Tigard Fire Station PROJECT NUMBER G0602953 PROJECT LOCATION 12585 SW Walnut Street DATE STARTED 11/29/06 COMPLETED 11/29/06 GROUND ELEVATION 95 ft DRILLING CONTRACTOR Subsurface Technologies NOTES Driveway at Walnut Street assumed at 100 ft DEPTH FRICTION CONE RESISTANCE FRICTION INTERPRETED ELEV. (feet) (tsf) (tsf) RATIO (%) SOIL DESCRIPTION (feet) 0 4 3 2 1 4 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1401609 2 4 6 8 /„ ,�CLAYTO CLAY 95 H IN...,...,........,1\1\2 iii CLAY • iii CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY 5- SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT `-90 !„.' CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY �� /// III :ii /iri 10— iii `.� • iii. SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT /� S /i CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY - SANDY's—TIL fr)d1DYEY SILT _ • SILTY SAND TO SANDY SILT 15— —80 SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT - SILTY SAND TO SANDY SILT SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT Op; CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY /H _ iii 2p—. _ .... • iii —75 iii o _ iii 0. y7 SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT iii / 4 CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY o -I • MR 7 05 I _ e•0 _ J�/ FAT CLAYJELASTIC SILT 25 "" 70 (Continued Next Page) Figure A7a > Carlson Geotechnical Figure 8 •GP O,y 7185 SW Sandburg Street,Suite 110 s� Tigard,OR97223 CPT NUMBER CPT-1 5py-6 Telephone: (503)601.8250 Fax: (503)601-8254 PAGE 2 OF 3 CLIENT Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue PROJECT NAME Tigard Fire Station PROJECT NUMBER G0602953 PROJECT LOCATION 12585 SW Walnut Street DATE STARTED 11/29/06 COMPLETED 11/29/06 GROUND ELEVATION 95 It DRILLING CONTRACTOR Subsurface Technologies NOTES Driveway at Walnut Street assumed at 100 ft DEPTH FRICTION CONE RESISTANCE FRICTION INTERPRETED ELEV. (feet) (tsf) (tsf) RATIO (%) SOIL DESCRIPTION (feet) 4 3 2 1 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140160 0 2 4 6 8 70 25 SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT conrd'IUCd) SILTY SAND TO SANDY SLT r - • SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT - SILTY SAND TO SANDY SLT SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT j/�� CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY - - Gd!i ....,To SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT 30-1 -65 / FAT CLAY I ELASTIC SILT i'' CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY . i% % e.deo `SILTY CLAY 0 CLAY r- q*541 CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY �' 'OP',4, SILTY CLAY TO CLAY ` 7,%ii - , CLAYEY SILT TO�LTY CLAY n1;1 SILTY CLAY TO CLAY / - 5;:ri CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY ( ir�i • 'MI .�—t 35- SANDY SLIT TO 4I AYEY SILT CLAYEY LILT TO£ILTY CL'LY r IA *l sANDY SILY to r:LAYEY 31{i • _, a \CLAYEY.7L T VC SILTY CLAY ,-,- 774\SANDY SILT Tn.CLAYEY S'LI _ /- `CLAYEY SILTJO SILTY CLL.' ' - - SANDY SILT TO V AYEY SILT 40- . .... .. -55 /7. FAT CLAY!ELASTIC SILT SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT $' 45-1 .. r50 C o J - D N n 1- 2 - U 0 - • SILTY SAND TO SANDY SILT 5--1 • SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT - .: 8 -- CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAYo • $L50 • ._ �, 45 (Continued Next Page) Figure A7b Carlson Geotechnical Figure 8 • .- r ey 7185 SW Sandburg Street,Suite 110 j 'irri Tigard,OR 97223 CPT NUMBER CPT-1 Telephone: (503)601-8250 soa-sef-a Fax: (503)601-8254 PAGE 3 OF 3 CLIENT Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue PROJECT NAME Tigard Fire Station PROJECT NUMBER 00602953 PROJECT LOCATION 12586 SW Walnut Street DATE STARTED 11/29106 COMPLETED 11/29/06 GROUND ELEVATION 95 ft DRILLING CONTRACTOR Subsurface Technologies NOTES Driveway at Walnut Street assumed at 100 ft • DEPTH FRICTION CONE RESISTANCE FRICTION INTERPRETED ELEV. (feet) (tsf) (tsf) RATIO(%) SOIL DESCRIPTION (feet) 4 3 2 1 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140160 0 2 4 6 B /, SILTY CLAY TO CLAY(continued) 45 o N CLAY - ilgQ� r \ f 'f%%' SILTY CLAY TO CLAY - $1/� CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY - - SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT 555_. ...... ••- . —40 • 60— .. . -1. -,• SILTY SAID TO;PA!DY SILY ^-35 .I. - h SANDY SILT.TO CLAYEY SILT _ •i • - SILTY SAt 'iO SPJ4DY SILT - • 65— • SANDY SILT TO,MATEY SII. _30 0 CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY SANDY SILT TO CLAYEY SILT • $.10 CLAYEY SILT TO SILTY CLAY 70— i --25 iii LEAN CLAY t SILT _ - g • Practical Refusal at 71.19 feet bga. 1 SoN type based on 1983 UBC o Bottom of hole at 71.2 fed. 4u • Figure A7c • Appendix H . Storm Water Calculations Appendix H H-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 • JACK PARK IMPROVMENTS PHASE 1 Stormwater Drainage Analysis • Prepared for: City of Tigard Engineering Department �4Op PROc�S �� aG4NF�-p`sr0 79701PE •-EGO _i O 9G 70, < MARK C°3 9."'14 !EXPIRES: /Z• 3/ /2 ! Prepared by: KPFF Consulting Engineers P. Dedyo, P.E. September 07, 2012 Project#311163 • Table of Contents • Background 1 Regulations 1 Project Development 1 Soils 1 Water Quality 1 Detention 1 Exhibits Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Appendices Appendix A: Civil Plans Page 1 •I • Background This Stormwater Drainage Analysis has been prepared for a new City of Tigard asphalt multi-use pathway located north of SW Walnut Street in Tigard, Oregon, (refer to project Vicinity Map in Exhibit 1).The multi-use pathway parallels Krueger Creek southwest to northeast for approximately 250-feet and turns northwest, crossing Krueger Creek with a new bridge structure. The trail continues north for approximately 275-feet and connects to an existing asphalt trail within Jack Park. Krueger Creek and the proposed multi-use pathway are within the Fanno Creek drainage basin which is a sub-basin of the Tualatin River Watershed. Regulations The following discussion illustrates how modifications to the drainage systems have been designed in accordance with the Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards R&O 07-20 (CWS Standards). Project Development The proposed multi-use pathway will vary between 6-feet and 10-feet wide asphalt surface with a 1-foot gravel shoulder. The typical cross slope along the pathway alignment is typically 2.0% and reaching longitudinal slopes up to about 5.0%. The pathway is approximately 525-linear feet long. The total impervious area of the asphalt pathway is approximately 4,800 square feet (see Appendix A"Civil Plans"). Area Description SQ FT. Acres • EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA= 0.0 0.0 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREA= 4,800 0.11 PROJECT AREA= 4,800 0.110 Table A—Project Area Summary Soils According to the Natural Resource Conservation Service, the majority of the soil onsite is Cornelius and Kinton Silt Loams 7%-12% slopes, with moderately fine texture or fine textured soils. The hydrologic soil group is class "C", with a relatively low hydraulic conductivity when saturated. The anticipated rate of infiltration for the near surface soils up to 18-feet deep is 0.2 to 0.6 inches per hour. Water Quality The new improvements can be divided into four minor subbasins. 1)The south end near SW Walnut St., where the trail turns 180 degrees, 2) the straight stretch that leads to the south end of the bridge 3)the bridge, and 4)the meandering stretch on the north side of the bridge in Jack Park (see Appendix A). Stormwater quality for the pathway at the south end of the project will be achieved by the adjacent stormwater swale. Stormwater will sheet flow from the pathway onto a graded swale that filters runoff before dispersing the flow to the slope below. Stormwater will percolate through the topsoil to filter sediment and pollutants before being discharged as shallow sheet overland flow to naturally vegetated pervious surfaces. • Page 1 The straight and meandering stretches of the pathway north and south of the bridge will shed runoff to the adjacent vegetation. Stormwater quality will be achieved by shallow overland sheet flow shedding onto adjacent, naturally vegetated pervious surfaces. The undeveloped natural vegetated terrain will reduce stormwater velocities, remove pollutants and encourage infiltration. Overland flow lengths exceed 32-feet and the average residence time will exceed 9 minutes which is typically allocated in models to achieve sediment removal to meet the requirements of Section 4.06 — Water Quality Facility Design Standards and table 4-2. The slopes adjacent to the pathway are between 1.0%and 10.0%that tie into the existing grade with slopes up to 50%. The bridge will be constructed with metal grating and will not capture runoff. Rain water will pass through the grating to the vegetation below and no water quality treatment is required. Detention Through discussions with staff at the City of Tigard, it was determined that the extent of new impervious surface proposed with the project does not warrant detention due to the project maintaining time of concentration for runoff by use of sheet flow as well as potential mitigation impacts required within the regulated vegetated corridor with construction of new facilities. • Page 2 1111 s __ 7 y ai , - / w E i \ / ! § ¥ h- t 3 ■ ■ me ® Ave 210/ la � e� . { �/. »�Ave * �! \ # - tea. , . g + ` 2 a y ■ ■ 3 . \ & i ° \ _ ®®- 1 II m 1km m, /� 2 \ . ` Q. u !! [ ;. ® ®+ ___ 4 ! ! ' ! a _ C ! a,__ & anytime,me } ©'~ __$1 _ , \ | anVISICI_ a Kip, 5 m_m 2 \ ƒ 2 % + » / } , £ _,-- « \ ¥_ - a / / , D a | i wm_ X \ \ 70 Ave ~ A 0 • • SHEET LEGEND pp Ei PROPOSEDBRIDGE ____ PIG DELINEATED { / / PREVIOUVEGETASLY ESTABLISHED -OVER KRUEGER y:> �•I" VEGETATED CORRIDOR 1Ef / � EE f _CREEK •SEE BNEF Cl.i {I T_ — — I.- I PNBDELINMifOWF AND j E /� / /, , , Y �'y/� '• ' r MS DELINEATED WOUN Di . -...'",./". Al /// / / -L . � /61' /! ,-• .� /T ' ! suRFuesxEn FowI KRUEGER % CREEK / /,,:. / / W W[TM DD I y 6 4 i G ar CC m 7 A: ' o ,,.., % " : ! : r rn — Q/ Y! i �/ j�;�•y' / ,'A PROPOSED SHEET NOTES : "' PATHWAY B. FINISHED 6taDFACNRM TDIA WAYiO �I//■ LY 1 / it '1r //' l MRICXGRADF ON UMI(MffWFAf WELL AS " Olt '7,k..�r'! �E BE'—_ I BE EINDOWPAVFMf RE FWN401F MEEMI Mom � ✓ ` �� •'•�a• C V1u1L l EDGE IN DRDFR TO ASSURE FREE ROM* S M "p .[.I t/ RAVAGE RUN]FFAs SHEET ROW A,yp� ■S A1.® i NF&R A' 1171 'sI STATION 50 J. \\il\ /GP, 3 �" ( ' "'_"" CONNECT PROPOSED p1tTR4 j — PATHWAY TO EXISTING 4or PARKING LOT I till — w / _ 6SIRw N. I I —, 4Y'taw OF1FC101 -- w — I GUN WAYS AB MO' M.dp me iv VAU1.7 W.* ----'-'--'---j - :- APPENDIX A DESIGN ,• ' / DEVELOPMENT OPMENT,icowoxux or WATER J NRtwu,nIMTrafCaTThN 0 10AI, __ a raRo \ SW WAWVf STREET `-- C1.1 Ir L marG NC II �L 1V i fl E y / + C/ I / CONNECT PROPOSED —"—'"°"""""` s 0 - VEGETATED CORRIDOR ti, k. - -PATHWAY TO EXISTING � . I ' ( 1 MFMOUELY ESTABLISHED 5 i PATHWAYVEGETATED CORRIDOR 1 / {�•, r / I I MS Ofuufano WETLAND �"E tl,S I I' I PGS DELINEATEWEilANOER WmHDA .N. F_ SUnfACFEHEFIGVIlit. i, c .� ';p PROPOSED PATHWAY z a — ' } Q w Y v * / il I WQa� m u� l//'�L "/ " „.1,v / 1" E Z x� S �1/_ I o ii .1r ',, , , , ' r, . F Q2t ,--/ l 'A- 'IL •L' IA I M Q —,0-Li ---i' �I '� JIB I A,• e . •• i I SHEETNOTES: MUM MOM `�\.• } y��"�'�'-� I 1' FINISHED cn GRA°Ouu°Yf�I�fEDGPE AS WELL / Mil L1,` 11 /:-WFIURY• / 1 BE 1/E^BELOW PAVEMENT ON DOWISLOPE �r r "' I V/ /� 1 EDGE INORDEETO ASSURE FREE ROW OF P Acne uado �J;i SURFACE RUNDR AS EHFET FLOW wwy as..{.. 1 A ' 2 F � ;/ a '�. i' PROPOSED BRIDGE A� a r / �fh /` p C OVER KRUEGER I , CREEK // - W .. i , � AIR / / i _ 1 / AI / /' .,,., �, � N C AU ' 1 A TV 0 / r MATCHLFNE-SEE SHEET CI .,r, //I� / .- DESIGN / / ( / • • i ./- . . . b'.4 / , / DEVELOPMENT weet ' ..�. ., o C1.2 0 • • • Appendix I . Support Letter re: CUP2007-00003 • • Appendix I I-1 City of Tigard Jack Park October 25,2012 irVOI ® www.tvfr.com Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue August 14, 2012 Mr.Tom McGuire, Principal Planner City of Tigard Current Planning Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard, OR 97223 RE: Pending Land Use Application for City of Tigard Jack Park Improvements To whom it may concern: This letter is to acknowledge and support the pending land use review for the City of Tigard's development of the Jack Park addition, which is located immediately adjacent to TVF&R's Station 50 and its community room. TVF&R and the City have had a long, positive relationship regarding the properties along SW Walnut Street. In 2006, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for the joint development of the Walnut Street fire station and expansion and improvement of Jack Park, with a concept design substantially similar to the current design for the site. We understand that the current design proposal is to make an ADA accessible trail connection from the existing portion of Jack Park,through the newer property,and directly to the community room at Station 50. We recognize that the proposal necessitates the elimination of one parking stall on the opposite side of the lot from the existing ADA parking zone for the community room. This would allow for a seamless transition between the community room and the park along a direct path across the parking lot. We agree with the City that the removal/re-striping of one parking stall will be a minor impact to the lot's capacity, while making a stronger and safer pedestrian connection between the proposed park and the station. TVF&R supports the City's effort to request a modification of the parking lot to reduce the number of parking stalls by one to accommodate safe, convenient, and ADA-accessible entry into the park and connection to the community room, along with the removal of one planter strip tree in the area of the parking stall modification. Our support for the current proposal for Jack Park is a continuation of our relationship and to the benefits the park improvements will have to the broader neighborhood nearby. Since' Je rey S.Jones Assistant Chief JSJ:smb North Operating Center Command&Business Operations Center South Operating Center Training Center 20665 SW Blanton Street and Central Operating Center 7401 SW Washo Court 12400 SW Tonquin Road Aloha,Oregon 11945 SW 70"h Avenue Tualatin,Oregon Sherwood,Oregon 97007-1042 Tigard,Oregon 97223-9196 97062-8350 97140-9734 503-649-8577 503-649-8577 503-649-8577 503-259-1600 EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND '♦. r:Y`:.J -. ':'.. i :.:f is :.yx;._ •rr• '`.� Q.� / i y • / � '�� . .� . . . . .�. . .l. . . . .l. ...:......':'.::: \a�:...'.':..?�:::..Y•:�,:r .:/:::'•G:r y:�J: 1y� .�.�;+\Ce\ �� .'.ter. /. i/ i PROPERTY LINE 9 F• : • �� ...... X` ....... J /� '�. ��"'" F; .. '• `�.?Ill—._ . . . . . . — — — _ PH$DELINEATED 1 .......�.... , r. . . . . ... . . l. . . . . . . . ... .- -3...�.. ...'r' ,-':::::':r-:::::::::.: ::::•::, :' .....� ::::'.. ;,.:\,1.§•t. ` \\\x . . 5 �/ �. VEGETATED CORRIDOR _If . ..' . ._ . . :•. -r'�: :•c7 u.. ::.�;r;:l. .•• :... :r;::_::'i;r:' .i•r:'::': ',..rrrrrrr:�::rr::rr',., .. :::::• - • • • / _ 8 f ' ' ' '/ FF xx �y�t.` ....�.. ...... ,.{s .. "" • p p ♦ \\ ,j� / PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED . ./. . . / / VEGETATED CORRIDOR ' :Cyi a / ) ,- . ` . . ':l:':}}::: �.::: �. ..... /::.z'..y• /MATCHLINE SEE SHEETL0.2 'y% .._.._ 4. • :i�`�p``\\ " �, ','/ '. / - x` 1. . . ::':'::'::1':::: sy : .:?:::::.:.:._.•.:::. ::r. ::•fir'::::"' :::::: ':::::::.:'.: : ::::: :• : O`� q� f / / PHS DELINEATED WETLAND ' S / / ). ' ' r:. .::.'.:. : :j':: :: r:: 1. ':a:f ::ii:: ':r'._ .:.:: : i•sl::i•:;i i:':i: :rr_�. �.:.:•r.:-2%12�.' :.;��`��,`�, \\�� / / �/ I. I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND .y. . .%.'.. .......:r•: . ::ri:''"rr:�7::.:f':}'.. 'r.':: / .. . � ate.- • • .�.�� \ l i/ / ./.. L-�-J \ • c .f. . . ..,1:.':.'.'1. `.::..' ::. ✓..'.:'::.••:•:• ...44' :'.'_:.'1:7 :.::....., :: . .:.:.,...:.'•'.7P:_... '.1 fr:.•.'-,9 -ram. ` \. ��0`\\. ✓. / - ` - - � } '�' ::::�'::::......l.. :. �:;7.:'r:::'::: I'':..:•f - .. :::'.. �\` � �"�\�'�\\� '� — — \ SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25% f:•ly:. t,�i . ; : /.1 : �:y! : t :: : :::�': ::'t:i: } 'i": i ::?:: '} 1.t �i?^` r .: y ' \\`\\\o\\\\\�\.��\\\ C.�\\�\\`, • % — �,/ . .✓.. ..2:... ......:.^. •'h...E... .,y .. .. : \ SO — _ — \ TIGARD WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS: Q I— / / ::� . '..;.:.r::':' '::1::5: ::::::::.. .vx....wE1lA�lo.A.:;.:' rs:l'• j.� .. . /\\\��\\\�\\ \\\ \\ \\ \\��\+�.0 i/ — — — — _ ::::::::::;::;?: J c / I(11 '::::: .::::::::..:::-:::'. 'rj:.:f..':..::':t.: r:r`':'r:ii:.::::• :•::':�i�i'r.'... "..:r::".TLR... ./• 1\\\\\ .\\`\\`\\ `•`�\\\``•``,\\• j% — '_ — _ :....1 STRICT WILDLIFE HABITAT d ! W O ........... J / , : :' ...„..::' 'r::':: i':"? :: -....,: • -jzf•::......:...:(:?:::'::(::?.rf?r✓`''tf;/:-- I'y.C? !.—<— '\\ \\\\�\\\``L�\\ /�/;/ - � \ N 2 co /// }i)i:x: :"( : i ;:r: ::: :;f.:• :i: ; :':':.: :_ !:r'l•rf.:'= ir�l /.�' ° . . . .�.•. . . \`\\o• \\\\ / /j�' \ \ z w // •/ r '�"' ':: • MODERATE WILDLIFE HABITAT I�// f:ra: :! ;r::�:C :: :f '•S.�iasif: : '•: :. :: i*. r :?:i::"{:r''. Y •/ ,:��ti\\\\ {j•,•Z•.•/ / / // — cc c '..Y..'.....•�...... �' "" '•.•'"1 : r:,�.....,.':.'.:.'....:�' :::........ /. .; ��\�\ .,. . / /// LIGHT WILDLIFE HABITAT 0 0- CO 1i t/ .>r.. .. .f.� ,..... ...... ;v.x \'�:7f .•' •; . ter/ .%\\\.' `. . . .,. . • \: /// -,s.:• . ,,... .K___.„7. c //..- ill Aire 0_ ' 11/ . .. .:'..1.7. :....:::...._::::•�:::.a;:':::•�:::... "l.:'ii.:�if.^ ,..r:'... y..-�_ .//\0�+0 . . . . .\ . INVENTORIED TREES / 1 / , �.................. // / �..+. . \ THIN AREA 8-I to i/ l 0.0 }/. {•::.�._ ::.:� •:::.: : .. .� 7//J/ .``� - . .y / / WI CONSTRUCTION 3' , /�f • '.... OTHER SURVEYED I— N '' ....sl.' .�::.::::.��.:::'!�:.::ri.�aiY:..' ::::.;;..:':'• U�.� �o . . . i. . . . . �'PTO, � OR FIELD LOCATED (n Q' .: a'/:.... r ir�j��;+�. . . � . . . \: • -� rREEs — U = > ✓'...•.. / y !: . . . . . .. . . 65. / ./ * III LYNCH TYPE •{ii> :�.{'.±rJ• ii.: :r�... . i,.�.:•�/ f ,�- �/ f. . . . / ! �� !RIM zdaal..... ' .r:i.1:::,/:se:.Z^:. 7-.�r' i....�. J / •• .,1. . .• / •. ..- \N kil IE OUT UTILITIES / „ -: f,.:•:I•"'• •:.:.---....--...-....;.;-...-....:,.-.:-.,_-.:,-,. ....;;„-.,: ' -7• • . i \ TOP OF WATER ELEV 231 7 / 1f .tJ45.kJ[ •. •. 'l• -/- `' CfVP CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL 1a ::. :."../""j �[7` ✓ . . - . i 7 EB ELECTRICAL BOX .�. y..;:. �j,. ,/. . ./ 2-8 Se f �. I IE/ i GV GAS VALVE \ kL,)!, .: l �/ �:/• 6•�• ✓. . . . . . . .. .� • IE INVERT ELEVATION ��` 1, :. . If/ / y ./. / .!. . . �' i I a MH MANHOLE \ . �, .I . ., � . . . . . ./•,•,i�- • I TP WLTER AL PEDESTAL \ it 17. /1 y AND CONS I V. y.�.s- . . F;/�1 WV WATER VALVE TVF&R WM WATER METER , / �p� — 1� STATION 50 TRANS ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER .\ \ 'l c. . 1 i•, r/... .y, . ./. ./. -%i . . . ✓ - 0 •■ uv UTILITY VAULT \ • I I 'A•..' .r./f. / /_. .f.. .j.",. . - �rl. ICI ^ G�VERIZON OR CABLE a POWER/ELECTRICAL /1� Il Jai"/il//:.�_.� ./ •r /,�. . ./ / —. .a r� ff' ' . ./r!i . . i r- f / '' �� {}o{] UGHT POLE . 1 Ill'.({ 1'•1L/. .. ././ ./../...1. .!. . . .i/ / - 1 ID IRRIGATION VALVE BOX y j Y.L, ,p. y. .r.�. . j . . . . . . . ./. . ,, . . y - . , . 4;11LZ HYDRANT 11. I11 j•• P / f-./...... / �1 EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES: CATE JULY 31,zm2 .e' /"./•.•.• . . . pasTING.S4OPE. 1 0 ' j/ / AND UTILlIY -- ' 1. SURVEY IN AREA OF CONSTRUCTION PROVIDED BY ///�f /••• / ./ • • 71 . y ' / 'EASEMENT"UTILG \ te PROJECT NO: vre \` L l {• � _/_• • ^�_ �1 i BLUEDOTGROUP,DATED2.8.2011.ADDITIONAL DRAMA: ,a i / , I SITE BASE INFORMATION FROM THE ADJACENT /4 ? L.`" "T'—�`-/ IP ii — TVF&R STATION SO PROJECT IS ALSO SHOWN FOR CHECKED: LH 1,'• •%7 i �"17-8:,40•'�' �. �� . . — T ?36 _` O CLARITY. WITHIN THE EXISTING PARK, '• %-I 'f �4 r`: ` _ ,.� � TP TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN IS FROM LIDAR DATA. SITE REVISIONS: // `- • �2T4 T5• �1 ONP— r i' • - '► — — ❑ ❑ O FEATURES,SUCH AS PLAYGROUND,BALLFIELD y- = • _ i a a ti g =a6� AND SWINGS HAVE BEEN FIELD LOCATED. GV —1 - . WITHIN DIAMETEREA OF BEENON,TREES 6"IN a . �_,_ ACCEC}, LID RIM=z27.92' -� --- Y` ':_ ��• iH1.1 ,8 "°"=-ir IE 12 2 =224.12 CURB _ AND ASSESSED. REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION • IE 12 ' =224.02' ACCE�$ D ' .•-?27.96 ®yER([ON AND MITIGATION PLANS FOR DATA. DESIGN MaN"OLE IE 12( =224.21 • MH DEVELOPMENT RIM=227.68' 198' / — L 219.3=BOTiOM?7 �— a SHEET NUM3ER - 9hNIITARY au,NHOIE., __ -! - - SW WALNUT STREET • - ' r ' v o 0^ z�� _ n MANHOLE ` L0.1 ( ' - ', \ \ \ ` \ /./ 1 . \ I .i f/ .�. f. • .1. . .I/. . r� , l ... .):. .�/ t..l. T...:-r::e t EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND • • l / \ \ , MATCHLINE SEE SHEETL0.3 I !1......./. . .J.,. . �... .,( ..I..... v : tt Y:� : }: tr":i - � ilW / �� 1 / l ! 1 . . f.. ........ :.{.:: 1.:: — - - _ PROPERTY LINE g. a s/ / / (N /` I / l, . .C. .•/..• • • •/* • .' .'....i.:-:':'::::'::::'.. �: ...... ..f._ . .-:•.:::•.:•:-:-: ::: 1' — — — - VEGETATED CORRIDOR g • , �1 / { ' // r L ` �/ /` // ( / J .1,�,.J. ..:.: ..:.s�' - :...1..... :.. !.Y. }l.',tL�.•fil.' .... •rC : PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED " 1 I t / / . . r O 1S / . .1. ...:.f'.�:.'."1.':.' /.'.' �Yr.•i.'.-.I.`!`.•.%". '. ::.•)K::.�:.'.: .'.:'.:': is'i VEGETATED CORRIDOR / / / / / ( / Fx I. '/ ) ( / l 4�' ( / :a.'::"::: �::. : :y:.. . .:::.c�f.� . 1i ::..:....:r:::.r. - —_ 4 a / 1 . PLAYGROUND r , / \ ,ItV ', I ......-.-. / Ji / ` / ,� ' E I 1 ) 3 4 r!7I(: : ..:::(/; :'::':,�/•::': �'..�/.I:.':Jr.:: . ::.•.:.:.:-a::::':.':::•vIt . PHS DELINEATED WETLAND �' / / t ' ,/i, . .•. ` •.•.•.� • 1 �� . / �.. :� 4,,, P.,.,;:,r. .`]:�`4 ..• .: \::: t,L�.` ' ).:-: }}.. '::-: :: :.':::'1:':• �•— —.I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND (, .7 /.•yr•dG SWINGS f J a: �. : w •. l I 'r5.:f:.:a.... ;s. •:aK'iF::.:::.:: :. ..::e : 7� !! l I ' \�.IV` / r�{�-_ii��FZ' � —� ..E:�:. ..��.. .S, r ......n............1 ` SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25% 1 . `` - F.. is for `:„ 'a :..,::•::•a•:::... ... ::.:..... ..:e..... ..... : (/1 / / r. . _:rS:::.: . z \ r\ ° \ i / . ';\J�u.�E,. ;. �' �l� ;��<��•• �r��,.,11� .1:!YQ':':::7::'7:.'::...:.:...J::.::.:::.�:::.. TIGARD WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS: iv may/,' J - , rS:..:' }3� 2 c / / . ITIS .-:::/:::: I�'.'.: •:-.::.':.............. .. ..r.: ::"::.::. 1$ .".:-': .•••-.• •...t..................... . STRICT WILDLIFE HABITAT ' /\r' 7 / r ,I;,Ly,�\�. 0 �i /.':.:•.... pf::.'::->..'.i :..:.:.:::�:::.'.:�.'..:4.1':- '.: �-g ': '::S:i'.:^ :':: .:': aQ w U / / I - .��1 • ::::'.........�.:::: .. r.�::�::::.�:::::::.�:.X::.'. 's:''.rr::::.:7 f.:::-':I:.:.::.\...:�.::;::::.::.:`' MODERATE WILDLIFE HABITAT > al ,Si004110),•''"..:X.••••;•••••••;•-•••••••%;;-:-••:.a..-. --- .-4:-..-:.:-..-i:-....:.:-.4.7,-;:;...-/:-:.. ..-,-.7t...:,....y. .f.f.e..4.,Z.-......,...../.:...........::::....::,...... ........... __, _ TS I. ` ( / IL# O4 aQ•. f \ -.. / %Gi .. ..:'::j ::• ,:••:\:.T .'. :rf.'.:::. .'C.'.. .E . . .. ..: ''..:.'.':::._:a:.:.:':t . . . - UGHT WILDLIFE HABITAT Q • I / / / .1 ". . . ,. _s- 1. .... .. : f:-::t::/.::.... :::::\.1.:::::::.:::::.: j..�.%:._:::..:.,e.�.:..::::: .•.a. . / ( a it > U . . .:'?...{atf..'- :.':.:':.. .:;.:.:: :.:•C:..::..• ..:: :A-:::::.(::::.:.::: 3i'/••:l}.•r:: :....•..:::::.K::::::.J. ./ . . ' • /� INVENTORIED TREES / / v / / I f •.��i'!�v.: • bv. .... i .Yr t,....../•:::::::•• J... ,.F' P '�,.• .� F WITHIN AREA ( � . : . . . . . . . . ( • rF " ::::: ::: . :: ' \ .� .'.'. . ./. . . . � -::•::. .....• c. : //:•:.::::�:?�:-a :'::::•::: � oFwNSTRurnoN Q no • • • .1......;/...........::• •F'L'::'.• l:::'.'''.'.-.:.::............ �// . . , � OTHER SURVEYED � Y ( / / / �. . . . t � rya ✓✓. L I . .r- .� 1 /. . . . . . . . /�.�.-.•.�.�.':.r- ':ii}:;-r%... " 4��;':i'��:�` '::rr:rf`-.. •�:.:;r"::.:. ..:1'r�i:':r:{�:•f�.f;•:'.i•t:':• ' .:.:.:'.::::::::.:.:::.: J �� p .. 1 � OR FIELD LOCATED l� � Q / I' . .� . . . . . . . . . ° .Y.?di• -' .w. ........ ...... -� / I TREES _ > / F /�J / . . . ./.'. . . . . ' �.'. � ` ,y :.:':,.r•" ; -"..:::�: —..1 ::. ::;;i;;i :..p:.:::._z}.::::r .r //I �. / f41, X Q :`_' . . r l ,fir .. rf :: , a • \ �. ././ . . . . �. . . . . . . . . . .� . .::{:. :�•:./:•::•.::::r.�Ci•::' }.:.:/.}::. ,: \. S'�•.�a,M'..-'•:1':.:.:::::'.:.::..:.:}:rr�:. .:.rt�.7t:;i;'i:;:.::::i".;:•.l::a::':::::::':::::::'•�ti � ! � lfTlLfiIES • • ;. .1. . 1 / . . . . • L . I .•. ./•.•. . ./. •• ••••::'.':.:.•.::. :.:::`:•r:•••. :. • ::' �;." f . ,...:-.... .\'.':," .:;. .::C k..::::.::.::::• '.::.::::::.�:.:::::: / l( F. . CTVP CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL I EXISTING CONCRETE I .... �'pz �`' Z // �c.'.(.'.L•.�'.'.'.'.' :::: {: ':r::•''r.:'a.rrf"!s y..:: ... ...:/ �::::;,::1� • : .:. :: . . r. C.�9/ / '- : - BASRETBA[L COl1R7' . . . . . ...../ .v : .:. -'..-... 7iik . . !::;.:r' 'r r:'rr•:rr:'j /// / 1: ; �. EB ELECTRICAL BOX / .- r �� \ + • •/.:::.:. .. ........ ; nr�:••::: �:• U�. . .�......-..1: \ \ / � Ir GV GAS VALVE IE INVERT ELEVATION I • � . . • . . .. . . . . ... .... .. .. • 'pS" 1' .. .. .::::::•' .. : '-"---•?' i — . . MH MANHOLE .� - e,. .. . :w;-.: r::'•' L ' .ty s.:::...• = / TP TELEPHONE PEDESTAL .� . .•% .f.l...f.a'::7{:.::.:..:::.:: - '`<dO,r ' 4..... _. s i . . ' .I'.7:/��:�:�' J- r 0` / . . . . . � r _.t ai�'ra �.:J.(. :: - _ � �.y T -'�� WV WATER VALVE / /. .• / ,''. :r. i:r: :rr.'E'ri• ~m't� � t;::.A:-' #13f.: :.:;rir•.... ........ ': J-- ��{i - . l /. . . . /.• • •l.'7:..:.... :......:..... ij� � '� a .. ''a' + .':•- ^ / 'I►\ TRANSTRANSFORMER I ` . . . . •/. . . / : ,` �'+l:.\.' w �`.:;` �.. :. _ � .� WM WATER METER :.. :::::..:..'.:::..::. ::•.. y�'.. .;;;.�'.� �te.� �t_:: ' : ,. / J J TRAN ELECTRICAL I • \ . . . • • • .{•>�'::.:.: ::' `� . -r. .;>'Z,t.!'� ` .. ..: 2f34.�E„:.. r ram/ r •.i UV UTILITY VAULT ,I �-• • ' ' . . . .j. ./. .• .Z ./. `.Nj.%p x., Tr y. ,: •Wiin:'47_;,b.:.'.:• !Jr 11 ,: .• ,‹f • • / / 1 . . .' ' ..�'!:.:.;1.:.:.:a.:.:: �.-: it .. jil,,}} 3•�:;;dTM a�t$1�.�&'CYt.. _ . .t:. F / �, �' —c0u— VERQON OR CABLE / - . . • • /' •r• ,`,\,..!'.:: t, ,!Y%�" QitX R':t,'.:"lt3i•Lif 'A y ..• : ,i. x J.I.'. • . / / 0— GAS I . . / �. . . /. . . .�. ../... ... . . :,\:: �:�,,J ay � �;* ° :::•..:.:::.'.:" • . .,i ./. . J J • EEL : .;Y,,, J>?,,. • • • � �..........• ........... .. .o..: � 1 ./ • 1 ./. • . . . . r.: :.:::•r- .:� ,-.::::: a ,�} :; PT f� �� s' �/• / 1/ / . ./ . . . /. . ./. . . . . .r :... . ;,1.;�'•::{:i:.: ::.:-4-.::::c:r:'::: 'f � N�- '�' :r •.. • f.%�/. . .-- . 1�. HYDRANT / . . . .'� . . • • ...l•".;t' ':::' /i .•:;{'•. <� .... :• +2 �. . . .� 0 � EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES: DATE: iuu a>.,mn • e-: •/ " f-:: ,. ,,,5 • •• .v : ..• .IC_.. :. :.r: r. %,l/. . .y //�;. ./. / / \ / ':::":"':' '•"- : ��- i. � 1. SURVEY IN AREA OF CONSTRUCTION PROVIDED BY � ,1 . . . .1. .`. . . . . i-. .... ..../'..s��.'..,\�....... ..p/... :.:.1":tr':;-:•r:rr :: : .......... ..•\ • •'i . .•/. ,/. . �. .� J BLUEDOTGROUP,DATED 2.8.2012. ADDITIONAL OR�wx •� y `l ..��:_.�., ,�.,;_...-- - / ��-::_:�� "' ' � *,� � .f�� /' 'u ' / // / SITE BASE INFORMATION FROM THE ADJACENT . . l._.` . . . . �. . .... .:.... .. \'` ....... .: .. . ... / 1 •:-.-..' "�•�� 1 'T., 1 TVF&R STATION 50 PROJECT IS ALSO SHOWN FOR CHEOOD: LH .•. .•�•.•. . . . . �. .l. . . . . . :::•r.i•i:Y•.••a•:•.:::.:: •t.iiii ::r'':: __. _ :.L:•::::::.::.:.::::.c:!�i:'/` n•�_:..•.' %�\� . .•�. . ./. . / / / \ CLARITY. WITHINTHEEXISTING PARK .( .. .........•.,1.'•••• 1•::•:111 ::..::}:• :•./ J'::••./•; :y:",•::••:. ••:.-.. .. l'.'lfl:Cff!!!!:{1::••yo f: :::.. . � . .(.• . . 1 / i it I . . . . . .). . .. .. .>:�^::: .......--.�..�,..L/..5::' ':'. ....!!..!...:.. . .r.r:.:.. .:'....................... c. ��. �O . . r' -`/ \ TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN IS FROM LIDAR DATA. SITE . /. . . . . . ,� . . J . . } !F!. ... .....:4:1"... ./.:r=t::.:.1.' •:. ..Y:::::.' ':.::.:.::::.::::.••4. ••.. _ .:'♦ � \�\1 ♦ FEATURES,SUCH AS PLAYGROUND.BALLFIELD / • •( ti...(• •‘A•'• ::. :: . q- .(f � te " �� ,�� ``` \��°\\`, / / 1AND SWINGS HAVE BEEN FIELD LOCATED. • t. • . :r �,y . /. . . / / 1 \ / 2. WITHINAREA OF CONSTRUCTION.TREE56"IN ::;\.: :.:. /.'.'7..G`.'..y . .y." . .'; ! - *""""*":::::::***,0 .:.. : ` i DIAMETER SE GREATER HAVE BEEN INVENTORIED • / t ::: ::::::..:.. r- ........;y ....... \%X.:. ::::::.' .:.. 't .J • • \� \any\ ,/. ./' • �f. AND ASSESSED. REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION F X''::::.: :':::::J':JS �: :•.:•`•. :. ::f.l :.: ...! '::: ::::• MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET L0.1 :`bL "+f` �J��Or / �7 % 04 \ / AND MITIGATION PLANS FOR DATA DESIGN J<.•�:•F••: ::. ' o\ . /. . /� �� / r 1, DEVELOPMENT SHEET NUMBER 0 10 20 40 1-1--7-1 L0.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND — - - — PROPERTY LINE S c _ _ _ _ PHS DELINEATED e • VEGETATED CORRIDOR -o 6 I PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED 9 VEGETATED CORRIDOR . i e, I i. i,tIl ::::::::::::::: [ LtJ . / �rli '1 ` ,. \- ` / / / (— ,` — 1` -- _1 \� 1 // r v /I J��\ r SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 25% ` �/ f \ > a \\ \\ (\ \ / �� ' 1, /III[[I~ \ ` �I I (lI Jj TIGARD WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS: Q H " �� ." \ J •N \ ( ° / \ >/ 2 III I[[ 1' 011 ( 1 1 l a ::'::;'� J z o 9P — a ��` / \ \\-s - //// //J)I llj� J I [1/� STRIR WILDUFE HABITAT w V � �� o �� \ \ \ l / �/ I��/ ll� i III I . ., Z 1 \ ` ,—,c= -,,� N `J I .11 J _)I� t >:� ,- \ 1 `� i (1 I / I\ - • - , MODERATE WILDLIFE HABITAT 0 soot t� , ' ` _: �� \ (/ • ) \ )� 1 I I I,: E=\::. H/ O / \ \ f \ \` _• '— f / ! / I \ .J•::.':-": LIGHT WILDLIFE HABITAT . ,,,, / \ �JJ)t/ J J� 492' wee ` I ( < 0 [ I ` /// I ( I l 1/4:e:;;;;.: Z �c � F I I 1 / \ � / , , \ /� , I I` , . l / I. I( I •;. ;� 0 — a J / J \ / _ J \� ( 1 I I ff�,,�:,:;::. INVENTORIED TREES -p 1,„ if c . i. . . . „ J� / /� / _, )\,r ) , ( t ) �S i[ :::•: . WII HINARURION UI Q r-1 ~ ' I. 4.�- j� J I1 ( } I \ , 1 �' /•~•/ OTHER SURVEYED Y N w ) 1'�F ( / > l 1l I04' ` / � ' `L 1 `' I !�jf ! OREFfLDLOCATED U ES 2 % • �� v fir } `> r 40° J I of \ \ I [ :`.: y+.: :..:..� Q.� 1:. /) < EXISTING BASEBALL FIEIiD \ J , [ \ ) \ .•--. ":y•:•":•.:.G.• .}... • �Ay .:C.:': 7.•.: :.\::'r'.': 5 . UTILITIES 1 / ' 1 r I \ l �� L C. . . . . . ( J ) .7'./•�...�.. ":: - •.:... CTVP CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL P 1 .l ! . I ',. . . '..1...:-::::. 'h:' : '.Y.':.t{' r.• EB ELECTRICAL BOX -\ '`e ( 1 LI )� \T ` , S: 1. 1. [. ( • •t:•:•4•;'•.:••V-%.•:t:• •.••::::: Gv GAS VALVE 7 \ \ r \ J t / . r . . ..' r 'I' 11111 l \ -• 7 j .V.::"�(:-.: •:: ......'..' MH MANHOLE ELEVATION \ INV WATER VALVE { I l I ). . . . . . ) . . .1 . I . 1. . .. . . . ....', .0b j:-:}:'.:�:':':::.: TP TELEPHONE PEDESTAL _ (}) \ I / I J . J I. ..�. .• . .`. . 1. . ./. . . .... -� WM WATER METER J r /II ) �x M f / / . .,. . .. . .(. . . L . . . J . . .(.•...... : .). . .1.•. j. . . . I•. •• ' j�-:-..� -:• Y•:::•.:•:-:t TRANS ELECTRICAL UTILITY AULTRANSFORMER < / / • U { / J . . (. .'.'.'. j. . \'. .. T \ Si �- J ,.� I' / - - i /- - . .�.' •) -/t• .. :..:.:- ,_..IE AC-.'�.��pppp� . —ww— VERIZON OR CABLE I I ` / ( �. �'•'•L'.'_(.-.-. 1'�l- .•• •.�.•.}'{•�.'I :_: :a� .�_:.: ^'tit'::.::' —0 GAS I ` -�S r / / . . . . I. .,-. . . . ./ . . . .1 / . . .I. . . . {. \- ( . I. •:. .•::.:-. :J.::...:•.:i ::i'rr.:\':::': r POWER/ELECTRICAL I ) J ( I ) / n . . . . .`. . L . .�. . . f.. .: +•.i i.t7. :.'�. LIGHT POLE ..../ / .•.�...•. . . . . . �. . ` . . I. .::.' '�'�. . .. .... ... CO IRRIGATION VALVE BOX ( (r iI) ( I I / J I. . .'�.'.'. . . .'. . j. , :;1:'::_ :' .':f.f: :: :.;, ?<`::;:' sa HYDRANT I J ) I ( (' ( ( / f - •••J'•'.''I.. f.•." -1 / / =: •: }... . .. • N./i > J I / . . . . . . J. . . . .1. . . . . . .:.'::: ., ' ::a:::::.: .:: EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES: OAT: JULY al,2012 _ ) J � y J )( I [ 1 • T l / J � - •,F. .•.• �- . -• • • • • .t.:.:;}r Y :.1} •::•::••::I"I BLUEDOT GROUP,DATED 2.8.2012. ADDITIONAL 1. SURVEY IN AREA OF CONSTRUCTION PROVIDED BY PROTECT NO! 1209 T . 1. .1-.d . . .:::.:, �,.::;=:. l� I t NT • / - I {,. . . . / l / • • • O\. .1 . . . . I I• • (. . .� �.. . r'r:'r I':l' �:::: .°r.:a'' -rrra,.i�!"rrr I NF&SITE BASE STATION 50 PROJECT IS ALSO OW FOR auwH: 're \` • C. \ I ) " / . ../" . " - "/- " "L T• ' I .-Y::::•' i .:. :::'(' .:::::::. I l CLARITY. WITHIN THE EXISTING PARK CHECKED. DI Il J ` \ \\ \ \ \ ( / • ). .J. . . .t. .�. .�/.•./• -'-•••••� -..'�-.. .. ) r n ,..��.1. ,_::'I':} AATURES,SUCH E8EENFE PLAYGROUND, LOCATED. ‘ "." TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN IS FROM LIDAR DATA, aEvmoes: ND SWINGS I ( \ \ • \ \ \ / J . . . . . .I ::::•}.:: .: :: �f-' 1::`•'�F'::r ':b'-: �/ -'� 2. WTHIN AREA OF CONSTRURION,TREES 6'IN ` \ �.. 1 �` \ \ I / '/ . ...... ..... .. . . .. ./. . . . = I:•:::::.:::•� •r-.-2•:. J• �, }.;'. DIAMETER OR GREATER HAVE BEEN INVENTORIED / I 1 \ J • /F • ••• • •,;• • '• {'� :"":. i • -.. ::::: :'-4 ' (1 ` AND ASSESSED. REFER TO TREE PRESERVATION r-1L \ , � ) / T NE'SEE HE 2 • 1 •" 0" "•"_�•'••'•.' • ::•!:-} ....... '':a' �:'.. • • ••'' ._�.:_.:.•• ' ( AND MITIGATION PLANS FOR DATA. DESIGN v _) , } / \ ` ► • . . . . . t.T. . . : .:.Z. �....... l / / r r1r` ` �'. .'j . .F . . .�. . .: '::::',::'::::; `:: : -.: ::7. ... ...: ..::...... :: l DEVELOPMENT SHEET NUMBER 0 20 20 a0 7 .7'1 L0.3 // SHEET LEGEND - I / i // / / / // ` ,/,', \ / 7/ • *' / _ _ / / / /—. / /L' PROPERTY LINE V. / , I / // / v( / � _ �_ _wjai / • i / 1 / / _ _ — _ PHS DELINEATED e,_i • / / / /,/ //' / / _ / / �_ � _ VEGETATED CORRIDOR a —5 -6 / 1 • ♦♦♦ ;;;��J /� / C I �// .>� / , %f/^ �;� / / n+0 .aid .ir. / / PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED 1 > ��ii'�' ). / \ VEGETATED CORRIDOR E11_ �i' / / / \ ��/ L� / / > � y MATCHLINE SEE SHEETC1Z - /// i�� //�� / / " PHsDEUNEATEDWETLAND L %//! // ,/ : _ ' / • 4 _ r�. _ // / /oy i / ��/ / — /'/ I ' / i, / (''///// •, /� ' I, E>'\ �. _ �\ / // /Y/.,— -/— / _ '� J _ - // // r / / /,/ � ../'��/ I-�. - I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND I 7 i is//( / // ,f ./ `� /,'P / • ii � /4' i OV / / / // ` //fi ,. J. I �// / //I I /ICI .�j _�j / - i // --1,-- i _ = SURFACE SHEET FLOW //^i-%j/'\ ," / _ % — // /— , - _V✓ET'LANii . . . . _i /J/l. /-! // i - ' > i i'"--' — — _ wC 4 / cll - / r -- 0/ / / / / '//%7r/z// // 1 / ) / / o � - r� 4/ _%i/. / // / / rY ' /. / 0/ / , / / f k 2- j / Y/-/' f / ///// / r i / -oo� / cc CL � ! / _ /// // .7 // jam / Z� l / .; _ -/ - -• ,� / Q ,� �� . . / /�/ / / �// / a ,--1 '77- // V -le r__ /„/ z . — co//i�/ / --% / / l / j/ / / a� / � / / / % S/ / //,/ / ,� i / / � / / � Qw- ii� � �" a- -- - i � � i „ ` / —- - �- — i . rt I- UQ o / /_ / '%_ _ / r// // i i„ � . SHEET NOTES: // - r7 // /� / %j // / so i i .... . , „, ,, : .. .) :, ,, ,/, ..,/ ..... .... , / • % r - / r %`�/�� //, // /� / rr/�� '1I R�7 1. FINISHED GRADE ADJACENT TO PATHWAY TO /- �/ // / - i i / r/ !� +,'+ MATCH GRADE ON UPSLOPE EDGE AS WELL AS ��\ / �// "/ / / i _ `► ir / Mil BE 1/2"BELOW PAVEMENT ON OOWNSLOPE filglic°77,:wi,•finL,,,-En9",,,,&97204,,L E IN ORDER TO ASSURE FREE .... ....0 . !. A / // //a_ / / i , / •� / SURFACERUNOFFASSHEETFLOW.LOW OF u/5oV 219-d691 _\ /i�� / // / / e ` TVF&R � li// i / // V /// / �� A -..ilo ► / STATION /,` /// / / '-- / .. -\ \w ---- 1 0 li + / / _ • 4e Q�L ÷ 4 e / II A I ';Ili/ / / / / n / / '�/ '; • ly/ �o; 7/// / e /// / I / / - // 4,.., ______ DAIS: lUlY3L2L12 // ' • / / / HICLEO'NO: 11D9 1 \\ V\ \ , / / I / 1 1r DOUBLE DETECTOR 36 • DRAWN. MLR / / 1 / CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY 1 • \ \ --.� \ / ay / Q C. \ IN VAULT 'qg CHECKED' PMD - /ry i , @ \ — 1 - — 2 ._ds i14' STUB REVISIONS: _LT coµ- -_-1c'. rvw. - 3 ,N\,z____.-,_ '''' --- -_ ___ - -- _ --- __ -- _ id( - � _s� �.N.�� :ems ,W'W \� , - as - U \ �� 3 W'W ' • _,,,—‘,.,.— \-- DESIGN 3 _ _ W- W- W—W DEVELOPMENT COORDINATEWITH 2 SERVICE TAP.O l - W-W W w w W __- T = MSTALLED BY THE CITY J -Z•W -w- / - v -w= �_�= w wW WALNUTSTREET i / o zo zo SHEET —ems _ a ncArm w w I I -EX. 24- W C 1.1 t / k / / % (e.- % t I- SHEET LEGEND 1 // //' / / //JJ /i o \1 / / / f ` ) \ / ;N PROPERLINE\+ _ _ _ _ PHS DELINEATED�/ / 1 VEGETATEDCORRIDOR a 1R • �'- S • / / I / f / / I / - i �j� ` / // Y PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED a �, '% • / / / / S. • ,�' �_ / / % I i- �.p. / /( / VEGETATED CORRIDOR m fy / /i 7N7 PLAYGROUND ` -/ ) / ) n i� '��N-l.d,✓✓ / / _..-//. , C 1 \ H PHS DELINEATED WETLAND 9' i � X / Jr \ ., err 6 ;' !1]► AJ / / ::: _ � I'4�. "/%l • `- / --. 1r _V • PBS DELINEATED WETLAND - e �'�EK NG SWINGS `r \ r \ { � ,+�- 1 � ` '��w i ,.,N / � � ,W>:rLb A::-/ <`� `\/li / 1. III" / / Ci / ( / w S,r � �' < •� _` - / ' o '_ SURFACE SHEET FLOW ,,....i I GARBAGE- � L' O ..„alter. `� p J • / i/ f :', .. \, // -,„., -_.:, .//.///'''/I' /11::-rn l _ i / ---/ V I co / ✓ A i , Q r v / y 1'r / i ti • , /� / ) \ ..- jj,,/,-- •---_,,,,, In r i o bm t - ( / �,.()5-/ o I— Z /' / / I I �I / J /K / �,� -I — Q o Q U /J N • / / / i / _^ i / j o f- _/ i o / i 1/ -te a. U �Y \ ,_. , . , , , \ 1/ \ SHEET NOTES: —SS SS / 4k, - .;� ! /... ....: vi , • • > \•� •''' / ,... /, / 1. FINISHED GRADE ADJACENT TO PATHWAY TO I Mig • __________ � / ��\ /r/ • / / j ��. .�. C�J �\\\ . �% �/ / / '\. MATCH GRADE ON UPSIOPE EDGE AS WELLAS Gonsulang Ergnreers EXISTING CONCRETE /A vi i W Pkd B \ / j BE 1/2"BELOW PAVEMENT ON DOWNSLOPE ` _ ��KETBALL COURT \ �1 / / // I \ / // // / pl - _ _ J - _ / / / 1�/ \ - ! `_ / \ /- �� / 1 EDGE IN ORDER TD ASSURE FREE FLOW OF SA uie 1900"": i J,� �. _ �_ .( ✓ c. - SURFACE RUNOFF AS SHEET FLOW. 01 , .,... ...... ,.. /;I / / // / J // �_ 7/ /� "�� Vir, /cam l i j • _ / T�_ �� ! ' D Fax'5,71 zl<-0BBr 0 • \ , 7 ,‘- ' , \. .\,\ / /fir / / / / � / / // f/ / j- ,:a'.: . //•�-+ � //�/- - - '/•/% / i / / /J// J JI/l `�y,4'10%e / / / / / / / / `// J / f �/ wBTuwDd / / / / -_/ JIJ� Q,, pk JG . _.t,o,.; .___... ( / / / / / / j// �� //ry�4/ r _a,'; _ ./ i:y 1. / / // -0' / ^ -/ Q 4c4 \ / /- / / /" / / / / // —•�/ / / 2 - _ `r�' ,/!d / _ . / / / / / / / / / '� / I / /� �/ / / /�JJJ///JJJ/////// // /ram / /o. _ / v / //: / /,% / / �1 v / / T / / / / - / /// - , r ! 1 11 i/ D., •• t'- z / /, /`/ r{/ / / 1 / / / / / / I : -- /--. r ) / , - / -- / 1 / i ) / ' % / / / / / / / J/' -/ V+• `t._ //// /// r / /. U DATE: mEvnE,zDn PROJECT NO' 1109 / / / _J /� / DRAWN: NAB �` 1 I1 / // //// / r// /< / /I J \cal.,?,../ / / /o- ///// J0 / / / / / '1 1) [NECKED: WAD l / / // fi /. 1'2 /'/ ' -/ -� A9'+�!' • . j l . / / /f \ 1� KEv6i0Ns: 1{ / r / ,;/ /) / /• •/* / I /J / : / / • " � •i / - / .r,� ., / /. ,�b:a (��\ DESIGN /� '- /• • . - - MATLINE-SEESHEETC . / / �//< / / � i//! /T /�i� ' / \ J/ �/ 1, DEVELOPMENT SHEET NUMBER D iDl I C1.2 • • • 1 / / J c = _'��%��—_// � _-..._.._ � ;�\, \\�1\ \�\,��- -N j � - --� � �--... Zl.��\ I, _ ' -.., , I' � � —N' - \\` -,.. te :'_,\. . ,\ . \i1� l \, , / ____ —`, � \ \ . 2 \��kIt ^28 11 I / 1 /;.'-------...-------1--- 7.i .,,,,,,, ,„,N,. .„.,, ,_,,,...,,,, , ,. , . , : ./: : ..,„,‘,,,..... ,\:_,, , „ _ _.,_ , , 4 ., , ,,._22,..., _ ___ -.---....... --:::------ „„ -,' ":-__--at,_ ...„--, 4 .\ ,., / . . . .. 1 ,-.. . \-:-_,I \ ( , , \ \_\ ___ -...... i , ,4-0, , ,--,.. N N. ------,,.-- , ,\\ . ., , , , , , , _ ___ _ II \ � ,,o., � ` \\ �\\\ \ .1`c\,. . . . . ,. , �. \ \ � 1 � \llkl � � �� \ .\ \ . , ' 4 \' 1 \\ �`-� � `�,_, -_, _ "`s \1 . 1/ 17P 1 , \\ \� � \ \ \ \ \ l� \\ t\v.\\\\\'h• , ; , : , , ..^`11 , \,.: � ;I�\ -,\ ` -, ' ` °1.�1i ,11 / \ ___ N. \ \, \ \\ \\` \• N \\llm\ � �\\ �� • ' , • , .1 .° �`�. \ ,L._ C�`1:� \%, I1 J1t-4----‹- \ �• \ \ \\\ \\ \l'�`t \'��\• , ; , \ — \\" ) \\\ \ \� \\ \i1;'I' 'i / \ \ \ . \` \f l 1\\\, ' ��\\� \,\ \\\ 1 \�\\ !i 1 11111 \ �`1V•• �1 VAwvl VA , �A ; . �I : . . . .V' 1-4 \\� �� - °r. r I I \ e � \\�\\\\lei. f'\ . �.\>, ' . . 1 '\ \ \� " r ��\ I I I I \ \ �� \or: ' \ \ —^ . \ \ \\\'\: \\:� '-• --N Wit\ \ s- \- --\ \ \ f -..=. , .• __ 110\\ \\ % 4:_. \ ,, . . c ' : \l I`% \�(1.) - l , : , \ \ - — \�� / 41.- `. \ \� - 11 ' P� ' • ilit"c' 014 , 4.1111 \ 04, -;#.„,, \,,„ ‘ %:\\o\s\:N.,•„N-j-,,..% -...., \.ik, \\\' . ' .--,' . ' .,,--i \-... - \ t c __\ , \ \ /lb kii044 \ ‘ N\ \ Q' t \\ )1141:„ derAli,....ffli,, trffr �< 1 _. W. ,�.� erg .raj �110.. 1 \ r -\.\\\\114 \\\\1\�\ �j ' \ m 1, ' , \ 11 I ��-r0� ti \ Is, `� \ \ \ m .� . ✓ — 1 D ,�1r ' ikk. `,`I , /I Yam • \ \\ \ \\ \ \\‘‘. 1\ - \ . II I poi \ '. \ \I !IIP441.. .— ii too „. • �,., � `' / 'N ' — ' Itill' %. ' I , ' s` \ \\ \A.L "*NN P -<> . ' . . \ \\ I `' `Ct 4. \ \ to = ® \''‘ \\ �.� ,, \\ \'i \: \ v.? x \�\� \ VAV�� •� }r. ��;; f , s‘ifik ''' I I ( 1e1) 1 \ • \ \ \ .+...„.„ ,...„ \ .\\ ‘,.\\., . : . . .L,+L� 1 , \ , I . —+ ,\\\\\. 1 \\\ \\ N \ '\;\ _____ vl 0 ) .:4,\,\ist,H10.--,. .\,2,01, 1 I \ \ \\ s \\ .\ \,.1 \\' . \ 1.\ ":\ , s"\\11\\‘\\\,"\\\:...,\\-3,....\\.\\\\\\\\''\111,„ \ r 1 ; 2 1 11 1) 1 1 I I �\ ,� 11 \\\ J . � l /ll / / / 1 / /� �\� \ VAy I�' Ill ! ! / / ( \ ``�,l \ \ \ I I I / I / \ \ `� 1 � � 1 III / 1 v A 2..-- IIII I I I l \ I \1 �� 1 / I \ \ \• ----\k / !/ III \ \ I • \ -- `- / ////' 1 I \ \ 1 r \ \ ,/,1,1 ' i I \� �) \ Z A rExO® LTft Ip. I iI a® • I 0 PI N JHU cap o pa n' z p..{yy s mV z 3 a:A D n o f k71r r D .,, rtIT rn -I 3s� 2 2A 02- 0p 2 x ryi m 8r4 Om m p oCzC <A, vom ms �'>. o o pD 7, z Z m O ?Flog Z F F 073 car r g T o. myN Z9� S 5 �_ $ c A Q $s ;r A r n "2 tpit n C y ma- Y�� o O p o m rAZ omal om m ti A A (:::=9 g F I R TREE PRESERVATION AND r a MITIGATION P LAN Laura Herbon Landscape Architect llC -V Q ri-I JACK PARK IMPROVEMENTS ome.sm.m.�sss I[ePI!!flaatsss z i 4 Y PHASE 1 ? City of Tigard Parks and Recreation - TREE PRESERVATION AND MITIGATION LEGEND \� ' \ \ ` \\ \1 I1 /} !� / /� lI J !/�// ' / J ///2/ �, L:\I , o\ �'' — - - — PROPERTY LINE / I� `j 1 ) \ 1 MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET L1.3 / / f l `�/ ( l ( i 1 — — — — PHS DELINEATED t / �� r ( �� l / ( �\ •\ / I VEGETATED CORRIDOR R 1 1 ( I / v �} l / \ 1 1 ( / / / / / / / / / ( \1 \l PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED § / / ( / 1 1 ( ! I / / / / / = • ` ( 1 /^/ / S{ I / / J ( ( " / / ( / ( _J_ _` _ _ ./11 _ _ — _ VEGETATED CORRIDOR a y= 1 \ I l 1 / ( 1 ( I / / rl J / > l . . /Af / , / if 1 / i / 1 i i / / / i ( s' � til I \ K / ( #�C�7�5 / EXISTING +/S y I / 1 /S / r /' ! r f /�fC f r - - - PHS DELINEATED WETLAND g / / // I // ( I / i PLAYGROUND _Jr; // / ( / �(��N�V�� i� '� . �/ 1 ` �/ �'� /. .�/ / i If II m &p / / J ) (/ I e t J 1 "c� t3 �� 1 0.4 J / ` /�J �� / r , I- I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND N"--t-Atilit- ^ 1 / f EXISTING TREE(6' / 1 / I .1 .�s .�4, yr , +,r`�, ,,l / 1 1 NI / ^ J Y ` 1 \ \ yr ,• 2 ♦ ~c\1 �.(� � ��[ea 1 - o .W kb --¢ Y J( / t i^ 1' 1" IN DIA.OR LARGER r 1 /EX}41NGSWINGS I ) J y^ /�rA rr=, r / i - / ? / \ 1 7l i III' ! J / \ .'V p1 p7,.-1 V ,. -,tti:IC y.3� 1-1 - ll(� ;3.\' \Y.- 1 / I 1 r L„� e t....1. TO REMAIN/PROTECT / / a `�(i.� �.� I tE/iJy�• 1 �%.`, \ „( ` EXISTING TREE(6" \ e--\-- ° ) f / ii / / r _s, . ar- � b��l, �� oil �' , IN DIA.OR LARGER H `� 40 lik _.7A ' rx. o TO BE REMOVED C r — J \ / \ 4 a V / / V / i 1 1 _//j / C i 44 Y i f I I �. / _"t' ' / — / Q EXISTING TREE LESS a C aim I / I / / \ �: Ei IlAtiA `.Yv �\ / i f / , v f //1 / ^� 1 Q O THAN 6"IN DIA.) z LJJ U / n0 CC 1 _ ) ) ) '/ ) �(( \ I \\ /1 / TO REMAIN/PROTECT > 0! / o, `� / II \ . ' '1 rp �' r J /� i 1 /% l / _/ /(// l \ J1 -' EXISTING TREE(LESS THAN 6" Z( / / Jl \ I I , `r / J J / / (`I(l i // 6 , J IN DIA.)OR LARGE SHRUBcc c / i I / / cc l iJ �� IL, � ;;� :.- j / • / / /i/ / / ( I \ ^ e` 1 / �® TO BE REMOVED a d ( / �� ` 1' ) ) 1 \ o, )E--Mr—M. TREE PROTECTION FENCE z Ip /1 i / vI r�k i .y�G \ 1 40404 ( / // \I Ir.- ,. -, J V 1 / (�/ vwi QYa�/ � .?yam `' i f/ / / / 1-1 co J / !►y�` �/,� 11 ( tc�. / `, ,/ / /�' J /If f) ( � / j I /J- NOTES: Lu H CC > / \ / r / �'-�� \' � � f fir ._tf �// �' (/ ' % a a LJJ °° J / _ , I i / r�,. 4/fr, ., = ` ( ( - 1)( / r! _O',j// / p /� �/ 1. REFER TO SHEET LL3 FORTREE INVENTORY d / / / / 1 r. �/ � / ?��/ J _ J ) � Y=J �,\ ( ////1 DATA TABLE AND TREE PROTECTION STEPS. w CJ V) L.O o V/1 `ref/�, / � � / / // I 1 i ` �; ryry�` ir, 1, \\,�I l �i�f�IA F►n 1 J_ J• ar r, _ -'��l o!/ i// � G _, dCJ ) \ EXISTING CONCRETEAims. / _ _ BASKETBALL COURT 1 I ''� / w N�&t ')1 ) I / l �� ' I / ,..r1ww - / Il /i •/ ^\ /r // / of )rp limy �fl 1\ 1 / / J 1 I�- / 'T 7 / A i'4kt(,e._A 4:1 ' ,f-• - _ _ k,��f/_,�_ _ __...../ , i///-- , , \. \ / al \ / / / / // / / / / 1,\ !r / / \ / / / � ��<. . . `�/ / Il r % //fit, rl , ,,,,, i . / /is, _ _____ ,i , ...-/, , ,,,, „ w / — `�. ,..raj` tr;..t 11,4 // - - - - -/- / / // t \ / / / / / - e► . J nt.. 'y ,.18 iA. i / /„E/G/ WETLAND 6� // // / / i -, __/_' i „,,,,„,,,, .?,..„..„...„..,„2 , , 2 r--- ____ -- fAlo ./ ,Aa. / //;' „z,/ "---__ // ,.., irkwortlir x. ., ,,, /!.. ___ , / '�- %// / / .rr� , - i t. ' Aim , . l ,� // _, // _ r ity tt, ) / _ ...,/ / / i / pkil,4 !_ / / / / n� Oki-` DATE: NAY 31,2012 /i // ,._ / "i- /J // /// / /I / PROJECT NO: 1109 • ) 1 ( � , / / / / ✓/, j• ,oiv„'- - iZt5�' �i�////J�/� / / / 1 i- on„wN: re 1 I i \ ( 1 \ J 1 / // / / ��I %/ 1. - J r // - 7_('/L. r /�4.� f- r // / / / / / 1 ( CAMEO AN > �( l 1 J ' 1•L/1 / /%//// '-� }(i/ //% � / � / J .. -r1 \i`/ !�,• r�� /--' J•1/- \--, REVISIONS i ; ilk / ( /* ( J 11/ / "/�., 1 '7%j`"'" I- j�--//"o e 'er /r •� f , i � '�— ice // 1 • DESIGN / \, ," / /7 rr, /, (4.� �_r- - - MATCHLINE-SEE SHEETL1.1 "4,, J_ %'. // f // ! A// % (yT \� / DEVELOPMENT / ( r ) / .f,///‹/ // O ////,- i i .... ./.,,.. • /, : a�'/, /T / // / — 1 DEVELOPMENT SHEET NUMBER 0 ^ OD L1.2 TREE PROTECTION STEPS TREE INVENTORY DATA ui NO COMMON NAME BOTANNICAL NAME DEN TREES CONDITION STRUCTURE COMMENTS TREE TREE IDEAL TREE IT IS CRITICAL THAT THE FOLLOWING STEPS BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT THE TREES THAT ARE TO BE RETAINED ARE PROTECTED. LARGER REMOVAL REMOVAL PROTECTION k a THAN LARGER RADIUS R BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 12' THAN Ir e §l 1. NOTIFY ALL CONTRACTORS OF THE TREES PROTECTION PROCEDURES.FOR SUCCESSFUL TREE PROTECTION ON A 1 Apple Na4espurrrJa 14 __ 1 _._. Poor Poor treasured at 4'above gmurd. To�ed __-___ 1 1 " S g • CONSTRUCTION SITE,ALL CONTRACTORS MUST KNOW AND UNDERSTAND TREE PROTECTION.IT CAN ONLY TAKE ONE MISTAKE 2 PIS py�,r a 7 'air Fair 6 sterns. 3,3,3,3,3,3 i o WITH A MISPLACED TRENCH OR OTHER ACTION TO DESTROY THE FUTURE OF A TREE. 3 Apple F. Maixp am a Ll Good Poor a.HOLD A TREE PROTECTION MEETING WITH ALL CONTRACTORS TO FULLY EXPLAIN GOALS OF TREE PROTECTION. 2.stems 9 6. Toped -__ 1 c n i&F 4 Syramnre Napk Ace, 36 1 Poor Fair Tdrameter kmb cavity at4'ahove ground on 1 1 ^! b.HAVE ALL SUB CONTRACTORS SIGN MEMORANDA'S OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING THE GOALS OF TREE PROTECTION. W.side. 6'limb cavity at 6'above ground on s MEMORANDA TO INCLUDE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING TREE PROTECTION PLAN. PENALTY TO EQUAL APPRAISED VALUE OF N.side. 5"diamelar lint Ginty at 10'above 3 TREE(S)WITHIN THE VIOLATED TREE PROTECTION ZONE PER THE CURRENT TRUNK FORMULA METHOD AS OUTUNE BY THE 1! .T_. ground on W.side. - COUNCIL OF TREE&LANDSCAPE APPRAISERS CURRENT EDITION OF THE GUIDE FOR PLANT APPRAISAL. n 9 ._ Red Alder- . AIM*Wb,a 9 �. Good G.4sd_. 6 PENALTY IS TO BE PAID TO OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. 14 Douglas Fr l3eudosusa,,,z,esn 50 1 Good Good 27 21 Red Alder Alms obis 11 Good Good _____ 6 2. FENCING _..__.. .............. • a.ESTABLISH FENCING AROUND EACH TREE OR GROVE OF TREES TO BE RETAINED. 22 __.Red A der _,.__ Alnus ruWa_ 9 _,, Good Good 6 23 _ Red Alder Alms nlb, 9 Good Good - __ _ 6 b.THE FENCING IS TO BE PUT IN PLACE BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURS OR THE GROUND IS CLEARED IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE TREES AND THE SOIL AROUND THE TREES FROM ANY DISTURBANCE AT ALL IT MAY BE NECESSARY 25 Red Alder _ _, Alnus mbrr__, 8_ Poor -..rater hated in stream bank on.N.srde;,.Root 6 TO REMOVE SOME TREES PRIOR TO THE ERECTION OF THE TREE PROTECTION FENCING AS THE TREES MAY IMPACT THE 25 _.--Red Alder Alms rubs -_ 8�. :rod Good 6 26 Red FJder . Alms obis 8 ._.. Good -_-.Clod 6 FENCE IF REMOVED AFTER THE FENCE IS UP. 27 _Red Alder Alms obit 6_ Good Good ...__.__._._ 1 c.FENCING IS TO BE PLACED AT THE EDGE OF THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. ROOT PROTECTION ZONES ARE TO BE 28 Red Alder _ Alms rubs 7 I Good Good 1 ESTABLISHED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST BASED ON THE NEEDS OF THE SITE AND THE TREE TO BE PROTECTED. 29 ___ Red Alder T Alnus rubs 7 Good Good .__,- 1 ZCi d.FENCING IS TO CONSIST OF 6-FOOT HIGH STEEL FENCING ON CONCRETE BLOCKS OR 6-FOOT HIGH STEEL FENCING SECURED 30 _ Red Alder , _.. Alms viva 6, , f Good Goy4_ 1 O O TO THE GROUND WITH 8-FOOT METAL POSTS TO PREVENT IT FROM BEING MOVED BY CONTRACTORS,SAGGING OR 31 Red Alder Alms rare 5 ! Good Good Tree is less five inches and as such does not ; Z W '- FALLING DOWN. have to be nduded in the Nee telly _ Q rg e.FENCING IS TO REMAIN IN THE POSITION THAT IS ESTABUSHED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST AND NOT TO BE MOVED 32 Red Alder `___-- Abnes ndui 7 ) Good Good ----------_- _ 1 WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE PROJECT ARBORIST UNTIL THE END OF THE PROJECT.. 33 Mow Saar SR # lA -.1 Very Poor Fair -5'z8 ,gnb-. rnoundSlp._W side. 1 _.,._. 6 z ` b 3. SIGNAGE 34 WJOw Sd,L8 SA b Farr Fair O CC a.ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHOULD HAVE SIGNAGE AS FOLLOWS SO THAT ALL CONTRACTORS UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF 35 Wilms SaiFa sp. j 7 Poor Poor :tears N. with corrected lean of about 75 6 — z 0 THE FENCING: h degrees. Broken iop with deay. 4 36 Willow t Sa4r sp. 8 Poor Poor Leans N. with corrected lean of about 75 6 i degrees. Q J c tD TREE PROTECTION ZONE 37 Red Alder Alsip nitro , B ' Dead �� 1 Y 38 Red Alder Alms rvbn ... 7_, . _.- Dead 1. - CC z — rD DO NOT REMOVE OR ADJUST THE APPROVED LOCATION OF THIS TREE PROTECTION FENCING. 39 Red Alder ,,, Anus rubs __, 8 Dead « 1 � 40 _A!_Red Alder . _. Alms rul ra .- 7 Dead-___-- _ _.-..... ..^ 1 W O 41 Red Alder _ -_ Alms rvbra__. 8 Dead_ _ 2 stems 6,6. 1 PLEASE CONTACT THE PROJECT ARBORIST OR OWNER IF ALTERATIONS TO THE APPROVED LOCATION OF THE TREE --" _ 42 Red Alder__ AJnus vba_,_,.. 15 ' I _ Poor T Fair _3 stems 11,4,]D. The 4"8 30"sterns are 1 1 � � � W DO (13 PROTECTION FENCING ARE NECESSARY. { Good 1 Good „_ _� 1 _ 6 Q- 43 Black Cottonwood I Fbpuus trrhocarpa 7 6 Cr) w 44 Brack CotWmvaod -Populus lradwcarya 6 i Good Good .. LLJ TERAGAN&ASSOCIATES,INC 45 Black Cottonwood t Popukes,brdwrarya 8 Good Goo[) 2 stems 6,5.,__ 6 W v = 503-803-0017 46 Black Cottonwood 'bras brdwtarpa 8 Good Good __�__ 6 • TERRY�TERAGAN.COM 47 Black Cottonwood Poyulus bxhaerpa 5 -}__ Good __ Cod 15 2 Q U 48 English Hawthorn Garaegos iaenipdm 27__•___1 Good Good _ 49 Common Hawthorn Gabegrcr rrvnogyna 12 ,,.1 Fair _ Fair _ 7 b.SIGNAGE SHOULD BE PLACE AS TO BE VISIBLE FROM ALL SIDES OF A TREE PROTECTION AREA AND SPACED EVERY 75 FEET. 50 Conron Hawthorn Qa weepes.rmnogyna 6 i Fair Fair 2 sterns5,3. 6 51 Common Hawthorn Crataegus mgnogyna 14_ y - 1 Fair Fair 8 52 Common Hawthorn Qataegus mzngpyna 6.___•__._ Feb, ._ Fair 5 stens 6.3.3.3.2. --. 6 53 Common Hawthorn CrataegpsJmnnvrna 10 y Fee Fair ._ 3 stent674.. 1 _. DURING CONSTRUCTION 54 Douglas Fr FYeudPtseya megnesn 41 .._. 1 Good _..Good 1. PROTECTION GUIDELINES WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE 55 Douglas Fr I3rudotsuov menses,' 36 1 _ Good_ Good - 22 a NO TRAFFIC SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. NO VEHICLE,HEAVY EQUIPMENT,OR EVEN 56 Douglas Fr .____Le menneee 49 1 Good ,_ Good REPEATED FOOT TRAFFIC. 57 Douglas Fr Fse(Ajopugn mesa-es-if 23 1 _ Good... Good 27 b.NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITING TO SOIL,CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL,OR WASTE FROM THE 58 Douglas Fr fseudofsugs!renews', 31 1 --Good Good - 17 SITE. 59 Douglas Fr Peudotcrnta menr,sei 21 1 G_.G __ood Good _..__..._.. ;. -._ 33 I. WASTE INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO CONCRETE WASH OUT,GASOLINE,DIESEL,PAINT,CLEANER,THINNERS,ETC s 60 Douolas Fir )7S-1.dotruoa'nerves,' 36 1 Good Good 20 c.CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS ARE NOT TO BE PARKED/PLACED WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE WITHOUT WRITTEN 15 17 3 I CLEARANCE FROM PROJECT ARBORIST. d.NO VEHICLES SHALL BE ALLOWED TO PARK WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION AREAS. e.NO ACTIVITY SHALL BE ALLOWED THAT WILL CAUSE SOIL COMPACTION WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. \`j^�.�` f�"L 2 2. THE TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM ANY CUTTING,SKINNING OR BREAKING OF BRANCHES,TRUNKS OR ROOTS. --"r i ) `` NOTE 3, ANY ROOTS THAT ARE TO BE CUT FROM EXISTING TREES THAT ARE TO BE RETAINED,THE PROJECT CONSULTING ARBORIST `-:� . J. 4, ALL FENCE SHALL BE SHALL BE NOTIFIED TO EVALUATE AND OVERSEE THE PROPER CUTTING OF ROOTS WITH SHARP CUTTING TOOLS.CUT ROOTS ti,�-.-- `c INSTALLED AS SHORN ON ARE TO BE IMMEDIATELY COVERED WITH SOIL OR MULCH TO PREVENT THEM FROM DRYING OUT. .� w THIS DETAIL PLAN ,a . LOCATIONS ARE _ 4. NO GRADE CHANGE SHOULD BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. T�� 1_ DIAGRAMMATIC AND 5. ANY NECESSARY DEVIATION OF THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE SHALL BE CLEARED BY THE PROJECT CONSULTING ARBORIST OR • C`- INTENDED TO SHOW EXTENT ONLY. DATE: JULY at,mtz PROJECT OWNER. �. t !��i 6. PROVIDE WATER TO TREES DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS AS NECESSARY.TREE(S)THAT WILL HAVE HAD ROOT SYSTEMS) (; h_/ � r` Peatcrna 1109 CUT BACK WILL NEED SUPPLEMENTAL WATER TO OVERCOME THE LOSS OF ABILITY TO ABSORB NECESSARY MOISTURE DURING .c,� 1 ;C �C. , THE SUMMER MONTHS. -ate..'14. 4- 'c..L�� TB 7. ANY NECESSARY PASSAGE OF UTILITIES THROUGH THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE SHALL BE BY MEANS OF TUNNEUNG UNDER `} \If.c= R; CHECKED: LH ROOTS BY HAND DIGGING OR BORING. -- - AFTER CONSTRUCTION �- 1. CAREFULLY LANDSCAPE IN THE AREA OF THE TREE. DO NOT ALLOW TRENCHING WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. CAREFULLY PLANT NEW ANTS WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE.AVOID CUTTING THE ROOTS OF THE EXISTING TREES. DRIPLMEOF TREE PL CHAIN LINK 2. DO NOT PLAN FOR IRRIGATION WITHIN THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE OF EXISTING TREES UNLESS IT IS DRIP IRRIGATION FOR A y '✓ FENCING PER CITY SPECIFIC PLANTING OR CLEARED BY THE PROJECT ARBORIST. :.:: OF DARD 't•:0: STANDARDS 3. PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OF THE LOCATION AROUND THE RETAINED TREES. DESIGN • 4. PRUNING OF THE TREES,IF NECESSARY,SHOULD BE COMPLETED AS ONE OF THE LAST STEPS OF THE LANDSCAPING PROCESS �'�•••••'••••••••• :•• CMG of DEVELOPMENT BEFORE THE FINAL PLACEMENT OF TREES,SHRUBS,GROUND COVERS,MULCH OR TURF. In! ,•��u��• �'I••'•/ 5. PROVIDE FOR INSPECTION AND TREATMENT OF INSECT AND DISEASE POPULATIONS THAT ARE CAPABLE OF DAMAGING THE . ::: •"•:'•:::::::• RETAINED TREES AND PLANTS. Er.:4:X.X . •,. 6. TREES THAT ARE RETAINED MAY NEED TO BE FERTILIZED AS CALLED FOR BY PROJECT ARBORIST AFTER FINAL INSPECTION. I. ‘ O TREE PROTECTION FENCE L 1.3 SCALE:NTS DEMOLITION LEGEND — - - — PROPERTY LINE j 1�\ 1 / /// / / /// // �/ - i' - \\ \: \ 4�r`7` `+ ' / x,e ' ///�'�J fJ - - -5 Lam`�J — EAf� // / � / / / ( - D• / // / �/ / Ali _ // // I/ / / t / / . ./. _ \.\\. \\ 4:• r ` , / / PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED I • l r ; - - -�• - — - VEGETATED CORRIDOR , I ) ( / ) / I // / r \/ � ()/ r .\ -\ \. J � � J- / (( / / 1 ( / /i - �/� ��( / \�`" \\\�\\r�,�/.`'`�� /1. / NIAlv / / / / / / �/ _ �_ _ - �I PHS DELINEATED WETLAND $ S / \ / / r {`�'� MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET L1.2 ' 1 Imo' / IAA / / ( / / �•//�I. /// / (. A- J - _ \ ,V- /• .. N / Iv 7"7 1,75 / I- I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND / ( /f 1 1 1 1 / ( / r ////// LI /� -�/ l' t'-• • <� * �` -1- J - / / // / /»� / ( / // I' N. y / I— Y • / —/ / / / \ /- • \ \ CLEAR AND GRUB ` 1 I I / I/ / //% /J�/J F /�� l / J f i41�// A '�; �•I I/` /� ` \ _ \ - ♦ CLEAR AND GRUB L ` \ ' �/ �/ 1 �/� / / I / ��./ l J/ '�� // �`• �� , / i - _ _ _ ' \ \\. NON-NATIVE TREES - -1 1 \\$ /' 4 1 /�1,\ r .r/j 1 / i� ' \ f CCC\�� /� /��/j %��4it. ��_�r - - - - �, \\\ 1— / �'J1 j��i- ` � � � J � �//j/I � � i�� '/ / � .� 4v' j i/'iz=— — -- - - -_ — � ` \ \ \ AND ONLY i-�,/� S`/ /er- J/l !� r-"WETLANDD '//�./ /�' ��// /%�` J _ _ _ \ EXISTING TREE(6" w / l/ r. 1 rL l( / / / c c-/ I /�J �t—/ - - - - //I //�/ ///////// . /,- / — \ IN DIA.OR WRGER) z al 1 /J 1 J)(iir ( / ( rf • l , ," / J/ •) // //// . ---: �\ \ TO REMAIN/PROTECT Q W s_ / i T ) N o r ` /I/ r�4. / // // `C /// \ a�i //rt ( / J / �/ / / /\ *� / `x' EXISTING TREE(6" CL > cc 1//r / / 1 '/ ) / /f C J 1 1 l _ _ rj- / %-) // ///////// \ +* *=- -%� ' ` IN DIA.OR LARGER) Z O - {/,/// i ../ I , ( l �.f r$ ^ �// L J. � J.// /, / .� \\\ �/ TO BE REMOVED O C . it r -----) fit J/ / /�-- -- /f/ 1 / 4 �C / r� // . / /r/ / \ EXISTING TREE(LESS ~ Y 11 �/ J// / /l \ ^ �, / y ��`//� i -IN/ !l f/ THAN 6"IN DIA.) J - d TO REMAIN/PROTECT Y To fl`r// / ////r r� p,./.'--� F(\ ////, 4� �, /y /� 41 _ �` ' EXISTING TREE(LESS THAN 6" cc L // 7 / J� IN DIA.)OR LARGE SHRUB U J CL w / / ��IA/ / ♦ TO BE REMOVED Q '(//// ///1 ff , / `/•/d/////�..`\ \\ `�yll`l \ \ /� _ Y0///r J//' ` ( __� -/ /��/l// '`\•\ ` ` 1 2� 11 /•,\ \/ .V' REMOVE AND SALVAGE SPLIT UJ U Q 0 / / ` } / /yj/////// \ •\ \ \ \ �., RAIL FENCE AND POSTS I-- `,) / ( / 7 J_ r �/ �� // NV:4 \ \ `♦ (, REMOVE EXISTING (n U -�/( / ( r I / , (/ iy/__.1' r/�--/i// \ LA, Ir, -w..w•AA CONCRETE CURB/ IFIJ., �� -/ %/ --,/��--//,-,� ! _ F SAWCUT CONCRETE ll/ `/ ^. _� . _/i✓/ /�> // .�// \`\ \\ \\\\ \ 7 \.�.' ' AND REMOVE 4.../ ' ♦ \ I ji: - \ / / !/ / * ` \ \ \ \ ►1/ // / .� // / ♦ \ \ t // IKEYNOTES /-2/ // A� \ ` J� `\ \ ,!. `.(/ /' /lam /, � / r \`\ \`♦` \ `7► \ \\ ti:'.` .,� / O SALVAGE SPLIT RAIL FENCE MATERIALS FOR mil\` l /f//' /////( // // `\ \ ` \\\ ` \\4 ` 4' \\\\ `\\•.`�►0 -/ TVF&R RELOCATION. SEE MATERIALS AND LAYOUT ( `(1 /� ( /� / / / \ \ ` \ `\ `\ �� STATION 50 Z PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES AND RETAINING \ \ ` // /! l I 7 % / / 2 � �, \ `\\ •�► I • /�\ O WALL DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING `/ / / \ \\\ \ \ \\ S\4 \ ,0`� �, ( / \ OPERATIONS. "\` \\, )\�I'T • 1(`l J////�11�/ / //i / \\ \\ \\ \\\\\\ �`\\� �� -+r \ O PROTECT EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN. k ( `11/4 11111 (((Pi / / / / /• ` ` \` • \\ \,`, ' ''4 1 ft I 1 \ ` :11\2\\:\ \ ` 0 DEMOLITION NOTES: ) 1\ j , )4 ///// I / / / / \\` •\ \ \ ` \\\ \ `\ \ ` �� L_u\ 1.VERIFY ALL SITE CONDITIONS BOTH ABOVE AND o I i 11 11t' l-.,�.11.111 / / / / / ` \ `\` \\\\\` \ \\` ` '- \\ `\'-`Q'`2I1 BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND.NOTIFY 1 1 I 1 11`�1Ii )Il 1 1 •//// / / / / \\` \\\\` `\\\ \;`\\ `\\\\` '\ \ 'FaJ I I f- OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES 1 / \ \ \ ,`` BETWEEN INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS 1 �l'f 11 r(/// / , / / / \ \`\\\ \ \\\ `\`\\\ \`\\\ `\\\\�\ 'ram• AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO DATE' iunnt zou T( I ^ / / \ \ \• \ ♦ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ !_11vi 0 COMMENCING WORK. PROJECT No: uos • l/` U \ ,///l1/ 1 / / / / /`•\\\ ` \`\`\` \ `\\ \`\`\\ \\\` •`,�I 4 DRAWN: n • 2. REFER TO UTILITIES AND PRELIMINARY STORM \` \ \ / 1 / / / \ • \\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\ `\\ . f•�fu DRAINAGE PLANS FOR UTILffY DEMOLITION. CHECKED: w //Il,/ ' ( ` \ \1`\`�\ N.`�;\\`\`♦\\\\\ e ') 3. REFER TO IRRIGATION PLANS FOR EXISTING /w w _ c \ \ ` \ \ 7p IRRIGATION IRRIGATION IGA ION PIA ION. ~/ I l L \ • Y \�\�\ CiVPD o O 4. CONDUCT WORK TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF ___ ,. , u /� WETLANDS,ROADS,STREETS,WALKS,PARKING LOTS, r - +�-_- �KJT�il �-z Ali,.: ."•&-- _ ..� EWA +fY AND ADJACENT OCCUPIED OR USED FACILITIES.DO cow - - .vJ�1� _ �T�i �� n f �-� ��, r� �lye_' GY NOT CLOSE OR OBSTRUCT STREETS,WALKS,AND numm0- • v �•a� �.,_ OCCUPIED OR USED FACILITIES WITHOUT PERMISSION \ -'� — .ry !�� FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. DESIGN . `�0 © ® Z� - S. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CARE IN ALL DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND jMH UTILT1lE5 TO AVOID DISTURBING OR DAMAGING 0 SHtf NL'MO:R — - - ;, MH - l If) THEM.ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE WORK - - —�_1__ e�� - - __� SW WALNUT STREET ` a m / / MUST BE RESTORED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. �Lr'1 L2. 1 / - / i �. \ • \ \\ -\ ^\\., 1 , // / DEMOLITION LEGEND 1 / ) \y -N / / J / \ \\ \ \ ��♦ ,/ lty r / o\ — _ _ — PROPERTY UNE 6 / �I `j \ l MATCHLINE-SEE SHEETL2.3 ( 1,:tr: l*rltrir'r•t"427( ��\ h``� a �1j 1 $ a 7 1` �� •L.�, • r _ _ — _ PHS DELINEATEDcI ) ) / \ \ ` I ,T ) / ` : \, \ •V ��1/ \� ` (\/ VEGETATEDCORRIDOR4 eJ ( ) ' ( \ \ + /J�/ PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED 8.31C ( /r/. ) t / / / Jt /t I / 1 / / / / r�\\• V. 4 --. 1 I�� / / ♦ VEGETATEDCORRIDOR• \ } \ 1/ . , f / O 1 f - O( , ) / / / 1 S \ \ / Jl { Ili \ / �1 / / I l p 1 1 \- \ \\.` / • / -•' •I PHS DELINEATED WETLAND :, AI,\ rKr / r EXISTING ,/ / , 4)�jyVjV- / \ \ 'l - /. .1/ L I f/ I/ / / I 0 PLAYGROUND rI ' / \ 4 ,1,� F• A'i' i ' \ / ✓/ I / / - ( { ' 4p Cf': /ls� ♦ \``� E • l / //� ' 1 i I-.----- / I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND 3 / / / J �, �. l`_ \ Ti . I �/ 1 '... /E)I�i l =4 J4•� _ �• yI, __AR + .� .W r 1 \ / / 4 I // \ v .A,6- c /4a�� # �l ti& - - -\Cl-�- < �'' • • n� •i \1• -'.1ry. `\ / if I �^ \ 1 \♦\ CLEAR AND GRUB 1 , 1 /,I / / 11 \ I / �` -J • /IF �kA" �` :'9/ �Y� y� ��\) I' o ,�{ ) \� \\\\ NON-NATIVE TREES \ r� P / 1 t ( \ / -��.P.71uiN - ,I 7�;i0/4AI �� /% 1�.1 �� •• }�� .� c 0 �.AA♦A \ AND SHRUBS ONLY I— r — / / / _/ \ /2 ,, ♦`♦ V x�s ' /_ \• �r .� \ / .�!� �/ Qo EXISTING TREE(6" Z *- , J/ ♦ - IN DIA.OR LARGER r 1 X 0 -� -/1 \♦ ♦ - !% �"fC` �� ' ,i \. �' _be,/ / / TO REMAIN/PROTECT Q ID ii / / J 1 t ♦\` `♦ ��/i 4416 ....I4.1.1 ,','�A�► ., �\ l t I \ /1 EXISTING TREE(6" CC .) // 1 1 IN DIA.OR LARGER) 0 ♦ \ N410,4141,01kNir I►' 41.410P00 �a �� \ rt t TO BE REMOVED- 40 0 121 ',. CC c / w 4 Ln t >! \ ♦\`♦`♦ /�Iy'��1 / •0 �� \ \ \ ` / ) EXISTING TREE(LESS _ G ♦ \ ♦ \lik u �• � ' �� `' \ \_ \. .J/( i `. / \ THAN 6"IN DIA.) _1 E>7 I ` ♦ ♦ ` �_ ,�• •/ i ►\ ' �� - \ \ r \ TO REMAIN PROTECT tv/ f l /ek . / I �`♦♦\♦ ��j`- )� I �C��r k\� �' �•�\\, \\, I ,II ) ti _ J / EXISTING TREE(LESS THAN 6' CC 12 1 ) // P ^ '/ \ I / t�♦ `� ,#...4K�� ,��r .. •_ � '* \\\ ♦� / — i//// �' /,/ ® IN DIA.)Ofl LARGE SHRUBL.LI d Wt / i I ) ` jri.a.Y / t i 1 �� A \VA- tit`r �— P \- /rs/j1) TO BE REMOVED 0 R. . / i-/ I / / ��. JJJ „�,� r 1. 1, ./ _-� A // /��/NN\/A REMOVE AND SALVAGE SPLIT LU u Q •� I �1, ��4��. ;9•P'C'• ( /"X ,. . •,, / "/ G 1 J /� RAIL FENCE AND POSTS / / / / / ' / * N. \` /+1 > .i'24,S1/0 j I :7C�� ♦ SI" _/( 0 O J /Il l / Q *' / / / ,- I -� •` , •\` �� I "y'i7 A • \r �' -'/ ! O / > /- wwv,. REMOVE EXISTING (n —, U • / /` / 1 1 N I ♦ i ��Ly p�:. ��' �j� ,♦o /� / V / 1� CONCRETE CURB _ -' / \ V 'T��/ ' % \ ♦ ' � �(� �' - ` ` _ < < / / 1 SAWCUT CONCRETE / , � I / • ♦ ` `I> 7e '.v�♦�� _ _[' \rl) ` / / S (\ ) f-\/ \ AND REMOVE 1, / / ♦ I ♦ ` E �. / r -S yC TREE PROTECTION FENCE -� / EXISTING CONCRETE ' / , `♦` \ y ��r W g`j �� l\ • i ///// / ///r( ( KEY NOTES - - BASKETBALL COURT 41':,.y , / / of 11 v / / / , ♦ _ - - 1 �`\ J\(�\ //y J_ N 1�i J I • O REMOVE FULL RAIL FENCE F CONCRETE MATIALSFOOTINGS. •j I , I � / i' � - , t*t* * � �' /�� ` �/ J � �! • 1\ I / / / / -I!`. S'.•E� I- f - - \ 11. /I / / /I — / 2r �' it1 \ / / i- / '� J i O/ / Z4 \ \ / / / / 1 /i OPERATIONS. ( I II) (\ C /2� / / / / / / i►f/ ._ •a,, va�F t0,. ♦ Hwy ,, \ \ \ , /. l / f / 3 \ / / / / / / / / '�/ �*:,,4 •�t Kf \�" \\ / /� / /J� ,_ // / ✓� _A Il O PROTECT EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN. I i ../ / / / /// / =' .1414 .{ *�\\ / rirEruivD'd' / / / i �/ X l ( ` Ilk _- / `/ // // // /i itilk41.•:44V-..iih,11 ` .=3, / l / / //J / f DEMOLff10N NOTES: ' > r� � / / WP / / //if // ---�� ' .. fir"`� z / i j�/ l / /7 / f��I / � �.� / /\/ // (ri I1+► . j� f r / r IJ �� / r 1.VEflIFv ALL SITE CONDfTIONS BOTH ABOVE AND ' , / / / /ryh / // / //l" ( 2, � �p'� `A��4I. . �• �r (� /'/J / �fff/// / / i BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND.DI. NOTIFY / / / / / // 2,q / /r �'' r •�'�V - f / //'%/ / / -� OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES / - / / / ,3• �1, /f/ // / / / •J / 1 BETWEEN INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS / / / / / / I / iv �' ' `' •@• \t� / / r AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO / Ili/ / � % / / / — •/ I / /f / i . .../ may+* ! \� - . .1. // // /// / / n .� 0 r,ac JULY 3tz012 I T / / / / .../ " j / �f+�+W,Al _� // ,J' / /4. ,..,....../ 1 COMMENCING WORK. \ / / /� �' / i / _ ! \?.. .P_; - / li �r J / ,/ / PROJECT No: wB \ , f / J JIIL!\- /2 / , \ - L- - NQ1� ♦� "O.vr•'' , n / / / /` J— 2. REFER TO UTILITIES AND PRELIMINARY STORM .. \ / ( a •/_ ///// ' //// // -�/1 +• %- \\ �� • _ y'� �2�5 ��//j/� J f / 1 (' DRAINAGE PLANS FOR UTILITY DEMOLITION. DRAWN: TB I ` ` r / / / / / // \, '\\ -1;Y2_jy;.1 "; / / // J / / r 1 r CHECKED: tH ") } ( ) / /j / / r/ / / it,„ - - . - \ '\\, '�i42 //- .1 ` / � / / / / - 3. REFER TO IRRIGATION PLANS FOR EXISTING I > ( / \ ( �/ %/ / /f / / ) \ \. \\. �`N'• L \ _ ' 1 / / ) ) I/ ,/i / / .\\ \ \ /,. .- j f c�J i/ i J^// IRRIGATION SYSTEM DEMOLITION. REVISIONS. / �� / r I .-�, _ r — / ��/ ♦ / 4. CONDUCT WORK TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF /) ( / / l , / 40 /� `> /r /J�/^ r / •\•�\\' \. 2 / *I S / / I WETLANDS.ROADS,STREETS,WALKS.PARKING LOTS, G J / (//' �I _ \- \ \ '�^ / A / / _/ I , AND ADJACENT OCCUPIED OR USED FACILITIES.DO { t //J / �- - / \' \ \ . \ t, • A / i- / NOT CLOSE OR OBSTRUCT STREETS,WALKS,AND - r / ' ( / / / , /` -,/ ig /� i� i " OCCUPIED OR USED FACILITIES WTDiOUT PERMISSION J / / / ) s / '• `��\ .1 • �� FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. DESIGN • /�T �// ! /J / (. i -J - • MATCHUNE-SEE SHEETL2.1 . , _ _ / ♦� % \� / J \ t ) t ,�,:\/</ 1/ (} ////(_ J Its\,\\\\\\� -/-dL -- -17� -,/,. +'\ N. ` /,/i i' / I S. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CARE IN ALL DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO AVOID DISTURBING OR DAMAGING THEM. ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE WORK SHEET NUMBER MUST BE RESTORED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 1�z�; L2.2 DEMOLITION LEGEND - - - - PROPERTY LINE J _ _ _ PHS DEUNEATED - ° I CORRIDOR $ a �E • PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED E a g VEGETATED CORRIDOR c - PHS DELINEATED WETLANDA I 1 / j j ( ` i J /{is /'-' / ' /1 )2 / ) 1 Z N -..., r ( j ) / / `r��Nll 41/ / `. •—_� PBS DELINEATED WETLAND J � / v \ CLEAR AND GRUB l \1J /� s (`, L rl` 1` \ \\ ` / / • \ -� �' —_ ` ^ \\ "l \ I(J/ )r r/i )14\ ` \\ \`� CLEAR AND GRUB 1 NON-NATIVE TREES \ \ N. • \ \ Ip` / l\\ • 1�l \\\� AND SHRUBS ONLY V f i \ > e , \ \ a \ \ - I — /1 I1— \ ( �I/ f F— �_+ ` ^ ,/1 , Jv� /\\\\ \ \ (� O i/��` ///Jf ..//4 ll I t' I) `/ll Il `1��/ / \ EXISTING TREE(6" Z W '° \ V \ ` , ` / /I 1 i I I ! \ IN DIA.OR LARGER) N - ` p 1 ./ o N. \ 1 ` r i/ )I)f //� I \ TO REMAIN/PROTECT Q + + ` e /� �i I > U \ \ ` TC ` \/l \ N` ' `> J if'� \ —)11 ! ` l 12 EXISTING TREE(6" Q• cu N. ct + ` \ (� ) I l Il `J�' J�' IN DIA.OR LARGER) O J~j •\✓~ �l �� f C\ + + J �) \\—_ _ / 11 1�i \N. JJ(� �1 I I t I 1 ` ' ` TO BE REMOVEDOC\ \ co � , \ ` fII // I ( ( EXISTING TREE(LESS Jl \ \ ), i ) ( `�/ Q THAN 6"IN DIA.) d L 1�2 ✓ \ J// / �' - `' / J ( 1 \ / \ ,��\(t�/ \ \ t> >\ I I ce TO REMAIN/PROTECT CO C ) \ 1 /_/ //j �--/ \\fit \ ) ` ( \ ! 4 I I EXISTING TREE(LESS THAN 6" G Q (U cc 12 �.)I1, } ' / ( <� _ \ 1 ) I `J�' E DIA.) T LARGE SHRUB W a O I C \ R+- '\+ !))I I 1 � � (/ I \ TO BE REMOVED Q CL N (( )~ ( /*I\/ (C?� + + lt4. I '{ ii�)r �/� �\ ^ o REMOVE AND SALVAGE SPLIT W u QO) ( / \ ` \ I ��y'� /^`�✓ �/ v RAIL FENCE AND POSTS I— = 4.>' • �, \vJ I) • "� J ) ` / , J 1 of \\\ i ` I 1 ` r + // _./.. ) -Now..".. REMONCRETEVE XISTING CURD N IXISRNG BASEBALLFIE -,1 \ ) 1 i I l ) l� \ ` � 1 < % SAWCUT CONCRETE J >> ( �/ / ( I) \ I 1 (� ( �� > �{ l Ii AND REMOVE ` + = I \ P ( 1 j / 1 ` ( i ( ' ) ( ( iti 1 \ jaih I / 1 ( I I 7�, y.--7K % TREE PROTECTION FENCE \ -rr�f _( ? 11 ) 0 \ 4\ of ( S ) I ) ( ( S) \ I I ifs 11 ( { KEY NOTES 7\\ ... \ \.... \ ( J l / / ) I 1 I) ( 1 l I ( _1 (((` ( r`y �j REMOVE FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE FOOTINGS. 1 r ) ) l , 1 / ( I / �11 ) 1 RSELOCATION SVAGE SPLIT EE MATERIAISAAND LAYOUT l TERIALS FOR ( N (/ i J I 1 ( ilk_ PLANS. \rI ) / — /�)It� \ 1 \ �/ 1/ ( ` 1 I� I i I l r ( J `I �, JJ( N. 2 PROTECT EXISTING UTILITIES AND RETAINING % )/ • 4 l / / ( / / 1 ` I ( ( I 1 l / J "( //J'' \ O WALL DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING \ \1 \ J J 3 ) 1 / / / - /) i7 I i ( 1 �.��4�� + �. iJ I OPERATIONS. ( ( ( I el� l ( r` / I - ) ! / / alp. ,` O PROTECT EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN. 4IW ISk4: '\ ( 1 ^tr OS J r ) / / 4 ( I ( I I `4`� �` .. I \ DEMOLITION NOTES: 1IJ �V J l ' i' '�,\ �1 -'s 1.VERIFY ALL SITE CONDITIONS BOTH ABOVE AND I ( ( / t o ) 1 1 ( >,1s ( I ^ (J �/ I- / J ' `o ,r9-, I \ \ BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND.NOTIFY I /) ' / ( ) / ( i ) ) I , ii �� J / OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES N. \/ I/( I1)l ) ( / ( ) J^ J ) ) I , I S �•�`:;�® I J J \ 1 r ` AND ABETWEEN CTUAL INFORMATION CONDITIONS PRIOR OOWN ON THE DRAWINGS / J 1 `� I / r / I I y' ..)/� 5 SATE: JULv3L 3N1 ) ) e ( �/ • �� ) / / ( r / / \ J ) / I / !N Y' J� (/ 11 `i `,I' COMMENCING WORK - 11� J /( r / / 1 ) ..4.:�N.o \ l Mani rn: vw �)�• + `,! 1((� 1 I ( 1 I ) ( ) �� 1�� _i I((^, DRAINAGE PLANS I 2. REFER TO ITIES AND PRELIMINARY FOR U1NTY DEMOLIT ON.STORM MAW Te 1 , I 1 J J / JO i ( .---+,.�� pi— v 1 l CHECKED: LN \` ` - I. \ ) / / I\ J ( : 1,:. RjA /� ((� ' 1 3. REFER TO IRRIGATION PLANS FOR EXISTING / ( ..... i\ ( ( 1 / , I ) / �� 1 ✓i I \ i 1 '` ✓ IRRIGATION SYSTEM DEMOLITION. REVISIONS: I \ o (\ 1 ` ) \. �1 I/fJ�� J I 4. CONDUCT WORK TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE OF 1 I < \ \ N. \ \ \ 1 ( f ( ) J �� (��yj \ r J �i WETLANDS,ROADS,STREETS,WALKS,PARKING LOTS, \ N \ N ) ( / / ' J / \ �5� ,, c lip- ) o\ f• , AND ADJACENT OCCUPIED OR USED FACILITIES.DO tt \ �- le. `\ \ \ / J \ �� vl ) N1, /// NOT CLOSE OR OBSTRUCT STREETS,WALKS,AND I l \ l J J / ( ) ( s� '\\ fA �-'1 it l I` ( I 1 / ( ` OCCUPIED OR USED FACILITIES WITHOUT PERMISSION • T v / _ \ \,K1pT INE SEE HE .2 } ( \ \ �� \\\��\��l \1/ ` "rt / FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. DESIGN ` / / I` I r I J e1 7� \ ) / / ( / ... \ \\ -\ `� \ `` CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE CARE IN ALL DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS OO PR OTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TO AVOID DISTURBING OR DAMAGING , - THEM. ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE WORK SHEET NUMBER n 10 20 40 MUST BE RESTORED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. rf, L2.3 MATERIALS LEGEND ,1 ( -- / J / // /• /// //,�/� \ \\- \\`\vt� � \. _ _ / �Z5 �i'////J / // _ _ _ _ PROPERTY LINE ,y 9 ( / ` ( / ( / // r_i ( , - -/- \ \ \.- J r /. -- JVEGETATED CORRIDOR ,y °6�� ( / , , . 11 / r \ , (f '"e' / \\-\\ \ \ �a-""-a r- — 1.L • 1 '� // / PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED • ` / / / / >` _' //r- /^ I. _ �C \. \\_ \ • dC! ^1 L7-$11P /_ • ram �- / VEGETATED CORRIDOR i i ( 1 K' ( 41111,j / f I I I / r. _ I \ - \. \ - \ ! . - / .�� Q`11I� ABRID Q r // I / / / \ c / // / / /j/ /`^) ~ �- `�`MAT HL NE`SEE SHEET L3.2 ." — - // Ail �Nk /' ,��f.:• MENT -� / _ _I PHS DELINEATED WETLAND 'T'7 Ic / / /�/�i ///r//i. ((' - . _ . \.`1 i AN.'"�..�.:21 //a�� ►�; �� / / ./- -" / __ _ I *Nts9. / �' / �♦ , / j/ `` i �' PBS DELINEATED WETLAND ( ` f / I /1 /�;/� � � it }// / � . r . . ``� � Y./ — // ��,��,► ` / j/ /, 7 ( / f )// l /l / /rj //J ,C / �! /-'-- ��.'./i .4.,�•4' . .ya5 -- — — 1 I i // } (// ,, //, / / .. / -i7-// ,I J/ fi �4. 4:7/// �� ,_ _ _ — _ _ _ , CONCRETE ✓-.1/r -i "--/ J / ( ! //ra // •�-j //�y�� .'m�a.,6 %• /��` _ — — — �' .\ ,':x' ASPHALT PAVING z O / .-1i�/I S i / = -}/r 1--- �`.^WETLAND D . - _ - .j ✓// /� /i �t►74'>V ♦`s�A /i�f — — - — — W / i l / J 1 ( f>5 --„„ (�/ / // Q /►��•� � /. / /// ` __�-__--___-__ : GRAVEL PAVING ` N / �, - / - n - �']• % . // / A 44'.4 i f• ASPHALT TRAIL p 2' .// / ) . ,ri'ri. r't'r //l/// — J / / I ( ./ // // 1 ♦� �1 / / �,.�ti�..r;ep", PLANTING AREA Z TO f / /j '//` / 1 p } / / / - r /,,, ////A...* 4k /-/// \ \ \\ \\ VEGETATED CORRIDOR ENHANCEMENT .X ,, r--- 1 J/ // r -� / .)'4'- - - //7 /// /jA-* .p, / /// \ \\\\�� &MITIGATION PLANTING AREA cc _ fa j///_// / ////rJ„ � //- / f`- ///�//, /r4P4i i - / ;f / RDUGHLaWN Q < o C/ ` / �� \ - LAWN REPAIR .////ram/i /" , ` } � nl ��.�//i/ // �� C • Q2 I` ! // _ J. .-/ / � // �� _v- I � RELOCATED SPLIT 5 : d CJ / (( ( ? // -� / �� • RAIL FENCING ` 1 / / /. J i� (// E��k •` A§• / KEY NOTES �� p� v-CREFE PAVING `1 ! 1 / // �� /�i/l �J j//� .�``1�rr,rtf4,f/'i-;''.' r .°a • SN �, _ O1 PRE-MANUFACTURED WOOD PONY TRUSS -/- / // / / ��? 4 :44r J "�! '•) + y STYLE BRIDGE:DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED {, i . /I _ _ / %� f // / ..� ,i t,4 {i/ y :i d �// /� ` I ) BV WESTERN WOOD STRUCTURES \ \ ( .1. f �,,y ♦� r¢ t'r ' .... .7. .-.' FLUSH CURB �� ; �• _/�( � /r/i /ram//R•`�H,��;, { J�.�.;y ''��;�:;r :� CURB KNOCKOUT) �' \ .f_ / // '// / / / t e n J �. i ... 0 ._TRASH CONTAINER MATERIALS NOTES: •.-!. I NCRETE PAD I 1 .r( // / / / �� i'r fb, �''•''•'"'E-'" y• '' ' +S STATION 50 1. AS'CONTOUR INTERVAL IS SHOWN FOR 1 �\V f/ . 1 / ' / / - ` •m-4:4 .4: '''; %, : 4i • CLARITY. REFER TO SHEETS L5.1 AND L5.2 FOR .\ \1�` I i) /I //�Il r/! l / /// 'i,'S,e�irr:1 ••••••:;•:;.: v 10 O I SITE GRADING. '\ 1 `, 1 -1((/ J//'I // / / / /&'i'ieil'�/Os \ • •y.�.' 6 ` \\, )11t 1( ))//// // / / / / •?ai��e'i<0k, - / �` raf�� I� ` \ /),1-1 ) / Yri'r4i'r`4:4: Ski� �'IIIIZI \ \(1 ((-1 ,<!{ I I((/// / / / r• vr4P5.�,14S3 a.'� _ 9y70 BIKE RACKS' Ki.rl /r ;' �°�pi�ri.rp7rF:�� s4i�t _� a ) ) ,\ V. > / // ! / �. •rr r t/,4•/n4•t�,0 •a;;M •,140;f 21• — , ( 1� 1_ • // / / /r :- 'Irtr,.. 4 rrrI��* r4 r fy st r od 0 1 I/) �( 1 'I /! ,/// / j••�/�•••� .. w e/i��irrar.77;°t ''4�is:�r.��i°,'§�r7 � .E e4'MIL )I I 1 I11�1'{ '�I I i ll// / / / I�•:.'r'. _• .Y ':Z`'�".:4i�'' :' 11�� GRAVEL PAVING )) l 1Ii(' 0I(//// / ry?/ / / I::z • ;:ri DATE:PROJECT NO: JULYl1.N33 DRAWN: 1B +/ , 1 `` Ill/ / , ' .. .••.•J'.;: .. . ':'....•.';�...'::•:•::'..... .'� BENCHES p ,i / I c : : :` • : .. yv • SIGN p A <I•rr 1X'07.' r �I•'41 I ♦ • . h r REVISIONS: \ �. LH j / i'rii'"`i'r?"r�jPiri7 pjS,r;!�r':etr''4 S�r: ''ri a (i."> ••�rp�4idr r�rr• 1` :!`i 7:4ii�r4��tf4iC�� ;;��y!Ci�S y`yrr�'i'eiS%ptir.�'.�` �irf�r.0:�_ rY fro ,.,,rr :�N srriri:4c:�:'i� 42'1.4•0- ,01.i ..i' r .'":K,.°i"� Nlir , Nor Nor, yam- 0 M%z DESIGN • DEVELOPMENT • _ 1 SHEET NUMBER _ 1 \' � ti _ D 10 20 (40 1 SW WALNUT STREET L3. 1 _ i • \�. \ \ r I �1 / MATERIALS LEGEND ( / \ `� V, \\\\ l MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L3.3 / � �'\ � \\ �'��` V� ` 1,7 — - - ` qI\ 11 J -• `'i / — PROPERTY UNE/ / / II ) l / \ / t !!!5!:;:ED \ / ( / g \ 1 < / / ' 0 /�J I y / 7 \, "\ J. /• !�/ ly(( 1,_ - — _ VEGETATED CORRIDOR Iii K / ( � EXSTING J i ` \ / _ 4i� / `—') PLAYGROUND r / \ ,.a` ( • 5 / J / I ( / - ✓ ayl ,/.14 \ \ \ r -�^`/ ✓ O _ PHS DELINEATED WETLAND -—:- - ( - j I- I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND /. / r �a�A. Ili/ �,, ,t,le/y,rr - y `it I�� > ac. I L r ^�I / /EXJSANGSWINGS j 1 / J ,E , 1�i �� ! y .V -- P�*4�y:�'r - 't‘ ✓F� ��/ I` / ( � ` i • / / 1 / \ Ca ram' •� c' • `• / ' r s _ CONCRETE r . / ! A I A , -i % 41 'r i • : •�� Vic. �u o O P�,�V,,,, :$ I- \ I \ .. 1\ `:.:. �_ ♦ _`�r /l 1, 1yi .e.y .., _�_ _ _/�11'- p ;\�n��\��\\,.�,.�. ASPHALT PAVING O 1 \ ` t `` 1 W ! ,•-• — O/ 1 \ / / .,�<h ` 1 r 1 I / Sr' \ Y- rie i \ -N / `'---:---_a_ GRAVEL PAVING ` LJ / • / / / / ` � ''' '` ( �� / of 1 , =' \' „ y_( /I y ,\ ) l'Ov = W / { ) I ` • '�' 1 b E� r J \\ \. A\ / )/J > I a l 1 ,rr, •,,�.,, cc / o: \♦ A. - % �// / 1 V / ' ;1%.5,%. 4 PLANTING AREA f ) J( l / l \ ` i.`.;> \ ( �'�� \. \. �(/ \lam ,- j Q a ro / \f 1 yell / � , , \ in / y _) \ \. \� VEGETATED CORRIDOR EN HANG —I /� / / / \ k !��S I ��'V. �.. fA,�\\ k \ \\"\\. \')( .1( - \ -\ / I i \\ \\ •\ &MITIGATION PLANTING AREA i CI- t l v / (/ 1/ i \ `• a4 J�1.k�.�''Z I 1 ( /'' :• 1.►•''7 , �'�\. \ \�\\' J, ill j { \ _ J / I ,•- ROUGH LAWN Q CC r-I 2 t •r I: / .� . V A / 1 / ._ i ' ( / q.• t �J Iy1 , �` /��► � _• � - (/LAY//.� \•, C (I/• JI LAWN REPAIR W 4. / / / / "'�",(_- ;�..v.i. E 1 IH•'✓ ;��‘� .V� l=�/� O O J �/I / / 1. --u--o-- RELOCATED SPLIT Q ?'' • / ,/ / / 1 \ -� } ``\\,`I I�:yr � :r\ � ��/ _ / O / / \. RAIL FENCING U r6,0 J l 1 , 3 /� l 7F J ♦' r J / I \ • / / i Er / �<- / `� KEYNOTES\ // I l Panly / /::� - / :4,44.v,,.... .•. \ �\1 // \ I/ 1 / / � ._ ��/ / �\� I �� ( / / / 0 STYLE BRIDGE: DESIGNSURED ANDOD PONYEENGINEERED - \ r / (( STYLE BRIDGE:DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED EXISTING CONCRETE I • 1 . SVAV4 / /�•,� �w�, 'J' k \\\ 7 r. • y/ // / / ` BY WESTERN WOOD STRUCTURES - ''. BASKETBALL COURT _ —_ _ - ' I / / // / ' .• • ��01.``'/ - -W & �1r1�I/`7// //\{ , / /��/l I� I I Jol I, I I i - _ _ _T / {- i -Ftf,.',:- � lg. ' , RI I/)- ` r/ ri o \ • I. i ' / / / i I w, / � � �rH l�i f�_ "�Q _ // , //r-- 7 , MATERIALS NOTES: V , / / J T ENT `rat ` I,�,, o�R I i< .�' _ 1 T T \ /// / / // / / 1.' IV "Z/ ! J •\� _ � / �r \ p\ 1. A 5'CONTOUR INTERVAL I$SHOWN FOR . . / / / / / / I � .\,,,, • 1�, X.. ` \\. \�.\ / // /, J,- — i l//_ i 1 ( CLARITY. REFER TO SHEETS LS.IAND L5.2 FOR 1 7 ( / / / p / / / / / _ ,,..... .. J. �� _ \\'\\\'\\�//,� / // �- i- /J r./1 / i SITE GRADING. ..„,„„ I . (\.. 4111 _ ......--/ / // / / / / // / / /, '� �\\\// , � . WETLAND¢ / / // /�///�/, — X I ' 1 / I / / / / / // c / r;!� o `.,�� / //% /,_ J�!,/ / / 1 l / r / / / // / /�/ // /�~9 / /r I_(_ �. - 4% 4 /4 ) - t JJ // / / / � J / L / ./ ^_ - ///�i///// fn� ` DATE. mLreLmu 1 ( i I / // /2 / / / - \ ti \ � �� / / i I //\ J DRAWN: TB o 1 ) 1 { t ) / i // / i� //I. - - - \ \\. ,` /i ! !(711- j / ° / / \ ) i ) ) /Ill //// '-'- '--- /.--. //.- /— \ " \ io,II .4.'. •." ..". '../ / ( /* ( I / , J //� J .... ( / _ \\ - \ \ J < / .�, �i`�Ai�� BRIO E" AM �/ 1 r > l /�� / <( //�! - r/�i /�S ��\�\\:1•Y.4;.. ' #22. . j-, /,406' ' , 4.��" �- ram ~ 1— DESIGN • /�T r/// // f. / -J - - MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET L3.1 .• 21 - - / ( 1 / /;!//C/ J� O////(� � .c�\\�'c\�\�' / d� '~` I %�/,�'�� is \. ��' 0 ' / \� - �/ 1 "� DEVELOPMENT SHEET NLMBEP 0 SO 20 40 n-.:mmm7 L3.2 MATERIALS LEGEND — - - — PROPERTY LINE c is akk §6 _ —_ _ PHS DELINEATED S VEGETATED CORRIDOR . 5 I • PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED s il c ff I VEGETATED CORRIDOR 1 i 1 / / ! ! 1 / f •.. / / c ( 1 I `'' / / )/I/1 1I _ _I PHS DELINEATED WETLAND ( / � ) I �' )) r J , t � \ */ � •)� � / I/ 1 ,r PBS DELINEATED WETLAND l , J/ / 4e _ ,_._.� r LK\ \` / / ) — � �� , �`\ ` �� \� I // r �- /IY ,, � .� n `� 4 � �\_�/ 1 \ v ` � \ /J-.Al I (1-1 /r )1(4 ti. > CONCRETE �1.. { \ > > \ \ I` \ \ ^\. I OS ` / ) \A\\�\\�`\\ ASPHALT PAVING z C \ r \i -/ 1 A \ \ 0 / 1/ J IIII\I 1' / } )1 A �� a��;J,�_ o \ "\AN- I / /i,/ i/11{l 1J)S { II/�• _____________ W 2 al `\ ` o i v`J— e \`j\ ` ` \\ \ ( / LJ : l\}) )I)( l 1 / {�\( a ____ -z--__-_-= GRAVEL PAVING i \ L \ I \ i i��i��-'��ei,�� PLANTING AREA Ce c 1 \ < � _ ") \ \ 11 I • aI 1 \ Z Li- 1=77 \ / ( v .v e` of V.... \ 4 /( J \ _ I (ll / r ` I \ .gip.e_�entie..e, 0— f0 / / \ \ /}/ / \ J` — ` ) / /� II ` J / I , ( r \ p \ \ \ VEGETATED CORRIDOR ENHANCI --1 2 Y \ ►({ / ^ \ J \ ) 'I (l ` /( ) I' ) ' S ( I `_ / \\�\ &MITIGATDN PLANTING AREATTS • r1 / //// l/ 1 �•. / ( 1 , / \ )\\�(� \ \ ( 1 4I ) �.> l tr) Y ci- r ✓J \ C / \ �` > 1/�} �' `�\` \ ) ) 1 ,- ' .... .... ROUGH LAWN Q Q r-I f9 - o �� (13,,1/ < / l�► ( �, "�� /)II ( �/ \I \ `) I )/ > ..... w w J / / { ,'l,G ` I I ( LAWN REPAIR (/) ,.I_ ' ( _( / / ( 1 \ ` \ I \✓1 �� l\ I v )1T 1 1/ ....._...r,... - RELOCATED SPLIT Q y \ t ^�� ) 1 ( i o( \ 1\ I \ `1 r �� I RAIL FENCING • ` v) / COSTING BAS RAI �p, \ J \ ) \ I ` iil I } \ \ ) \j \ \> l\ \ ` \ < / .-/ KEY NOTES // C>/:/( K. , / ( �, ( I J I ( \ �` �J{ ) \ } } ` \ \ I 1 PRE-MANUFACFURED WOOD PONY TRUSS ` ' I \ I ( I 1 / ( I \ < J \ ' 4 ( ry� \ / \ ( l I O STYLE BRIDGE:DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED •"--;‘.....1.sv ---. ( :40: ) \ \ , �l ( I 1 1 I ) ( / \ \ / ; c\4 1 ( BY WESTERN WOOD STRUCTURES / \I \ ( I /r I/ I ) ) \ tr / ) ( fit) \ ` ` J ( 1'>\l } MATERIALS NOTES: \T J I 1 r/J 1 \ \ \` \ / / ' ) ) ( ) J { \ ` I I \ ��1 ( / / I ( i J/(-1.,- 1. A 5'CONTOUR INTERVAL IS SHOWN FOR ( `^ / / 1 / 1 1 } � ( )/ J % \ RTOSHEETSL5.1ANDL5.2FOR / 1 - ' 1 .S r / / /♦ r • ) 1 J � �. \Ai' I 11 J 1 \ ( ( �� I o J l 1 v �� \7/ /( l))) c> 1 I / / i / 1- ) ) ( 1 �` V ,, //� ! 1 DATE: ,ULY 31,2011 / I l / / J J c J (J I' •� PRCUECT J</ , fil . ) 1 t1 � J / J( / 1 ( ;' I ( /) / 1 !\11//(^-N ��E NO: �os �T i. / 1 > /> / / °1 1 r ) �'C�` ��,.�.,{� fllJ� \ ) CHECKED: LH \� \ • I \ (� J J ` I / I \ • / / ( 1 N V,MAI t I ` 1 1' J REVISIONS: i ‘-if i ''' ( / i , \ 1 \ \\ .� � .1. —\ \ \ \ / / J �/ / / 1 Olt �44.`t :.1 (k ( �1\1ii \ �1 •\ I } . \ � -N l 1 -/ +�� \` � ._ ' \/ ( 1 (1 DESIGN . / v �) — ) , \ \mfi INE sEE HEeT.2 ) / / • . \ \ �'\4 . \\1 ` l s , / DEVELOPMENT / r(` , \ / \ \ \ SHEET NUMBER 0 10 10 40 71.7- L3.3 LAYOUT LEGEND _ _ �` I / / / // ✓/! %- \ I' •-• .215 ....2 // / / - - PROPERTY LINE t 1 ) \ 4 (� �/ / // // / / // ( e. °/' / - y / --i / #., '' J I ) \ \ / // / / / // / / /i - - i - N'..) / 1/� r/ /r _ _ _ — VEGETATED CORRIDOR k >n a ) / � I \ l / �/ !, / /y� ( `� S / a • 1 € 1 ) ! / / �' / / .''' /�� / / �,w. ✓ r _ J + ✓f // / PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED �� ( / ( 0 /(� �(. �+ .2l� +. . ./ - i`� F 5422Q 6 _ -•''''''' —/ VEGETATED CORRIDOR I r , / l �, / c l 1 / �/`- -`-j• / / t i 0. 4. -/ . . „5� (a i`•,, aru 3 .9.7976 / / / - I / / S /r / / / /� f ) / - - - /// ' ` J / / I PHS DELINEATED WETLAND 3 -MATCHLINE-SEE SHEETL4.2 / /i ( / / / / / �// L_ //� / (,�`r�` _,.Y / /- . 1 �J` _ _ /�3,, T_� / - — ) Il / / ( // �J /] • • / / '72/ r / // I / // PBSDELINEATEDWETLAND ! / / / y • • l - / _ / / , ,___. • i_-_-� ( ) / /)J / l / . i East 64218.228 \ ( / / ) // ///( • —/ , // )I/(/� /� /r / :../ /i/ i i i / i — �� J / // / / North 3727323714" "' '' ` I / 1 )S/ / /J / /// /J/// 7 \ i il/ // — //ii%'" /�i� �� EL — — \ ,--, ( ) (/ /(/ (, ---, /,'�// / / Y,...:-:/- '�% // J// i/ / �. _/ i — ,,tu.35s44\ _ — PCB POINT OF BEGINNING ` North t6 _ _ _ PC POINT OF CURVATURE \\ ` /r /� /}ll I 1 - �- l -`. - /� '% / i i /� /_�/ • i r - _ _ _ \ _ _ _ PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE 7 ) I/l "2-- , ) ' r/- /-- (J \ S �r %/%r�%/'--i`Z-0/ /%/ '� '/i /_izr -- —_ _ __ \ PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE / �/t ".."...-• i-_ ( /./ f / //Jf`y 1 J - /l-- J / /�_/_ /, /`. % _ _ — � \ PT POINT OF TANGENCY Z C / r -ll�/f i '' /�- /�J//- I-- r-- 'WETLAND D - - - - -J//�✓.//4 / --, 7// /� —.:. ' ///—_,% -- — _ — — _ = —` \ N R LENGTH w +O / II cu . f ( / J (v . // i// / /i / ,..- „-..„--.• \�\ ALIGN U / //r(i� kO ( 10 / / > / 1/// �/= f/ // / // / . /�i . /; \ > a, / J ) / ° I - - rj - -�'�/-- • // // /// / i / .`/%. / CC EASTING/NORTHING O !///i//J•/ I / // // S)/% / /Ye%%-) - / // ////// / /i/. -// r / / / Nvm avvm 275 SURVEY COORDINATES c -O J/////i- % ( i ✓ ( ( /f. -/._ `'—:'/ �// `(/ �/ '�// // i/ may', /� / /j PRC d ro (J%f// rim J / �// /` 0 1 l / / / r•J/J l//%/ /jam /-• / //� / /%% 110,0,33226z7 7 LAYOUT NOTES: z Y 11 / 2/ / J I/� S ` v,`,c - - - / // /i // // ///./ // — r0 �/ ) )/ ) j / /�/� , - _ _ - G\ • - - -i/ to. �'(/ j/ // //, ; // 1. ELECTRONIC DIGITAL AUTOCAD FILE SHOWING Q CL f //r F _, - / /-/// / / ,\_ ///i / LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS —I Y 11 // ( _/^ f Z /ri / / ♦ ♦ AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION STAKING 2 //ll/// //�� /�/ _ `~ // I/////// 7 ♦/I J PURPOSES. F-' Q CD i / _ / a // / // /% / / % 7/ o_ w �, (//f ///i f/ \ // ✓ - `/- //�/jR,�S/, / 7 / CURVE INFORMATION 0 C/) O / I / _// /// 'ACC / /� CURVE CURVE CURVE Q f�/`/r/�/ �'" v `✓} _✓ ') - /yj��////„"; --''. / / / '- • j� NUMBER CENTERLINE RADIUS LENGTH < < I - // ( - - - // /J - f✓///�/// / . / / / f __ _ 5Q 28.56' 42.59' —I• CL V • 1f Ea.t 6H75.45D2 6Q 275.98' 134.78' (/ / . ..- -/r %% ,_i/ Jj- / PRC i 4 /2 7/ / �� ',NEN 32ssea= s I 7 • i I / Q 113.1D' 24.18' ..L•� �` `'�� `,�/� // -"/..../ ./ .�.., tas i ,�/N. i� >- J .0 North 322.5 East 446a / / /r f / / r / Cl 356.54' 34.72' ��1 1 �,/ jr/ii/i% / 4�:��'L'� �/ ��/, \\ �' - ram / / �� ' ' / 1 ( I. • ). /9'' // /.y, / / Pa � �� ', 1®� Q 13a.zr zasr \` I( // /� / / Eck 6w:4s1: / / i 14 PRC 10 18.00' 18.95' .. \\ - ,- /�///// //i / o / m ./..--- / ,� - North 322569 East . TVF&R /ell , � 11 34.06' 36.23' 1 \,I1 - '-/ %/rwit // / / / /j/ / _ 13 '� + STATION 50 ,\ \ +I \-\ l//��////1 /77// / / ' / /� 1 ©� 1� J ( o lz 18.00' 18.65' ,\ \ ) 1\ jl i) -I/// ///((// / / ////.;/. ;�� r t3 195.71' 26.17' \() 1V Jll( 1 f(1/l l / / / ., / / � ,)� 5264 Na1,,6;9275v7 OeD3 L) \\ \; >4 ///// / / / / /1 It a )i(( / // ./// / / / / qq;// N '7.� / 2r O i///// / / / 4 // �t // \1101 ffl(//// / e / / / , / / / �ER� 1>D� (C l/ �(f!!/ / / / / / // / (/( ' �/////1 / 7/ / // /; / / / / .,� .i DRAWN: TB \\ \ J/ //�/ / / / 10 ,— CHECKED: LH \ /, n J ' ( t 1 '— —236._ — ' ° REVISIONS: n.—MDI. O O _ O ii O.. ' �,_"e -• —• � F — \ DESIGN DEVELOPMENT — — _ — f -� r N \ I / SHEET NIIMRER \ / 0 w� - - - — - - — _ _ — SW WALNUT STREET L4. 1 \ ` \ \ \ \ ( 1 / , 1 i • 4_ / I ) ✓'1•,(` �/T/ ` j ,I kLAYOUT LEGEND 1 / �1 \ �,� \v '- - �) \ \ \\\\ l i 1/ J/ // / ) / ✓( /// l l!/I` r °) \I• :::it I ) ) ,_., 1 1 I / / I J I / Ir I / -- \I — - - — PROPERTY LINE `a / // _� / 1 / \ v 1 I J ) / / / / / , * - . / / JJ( t) \t \ v' l a � I / / ( ( ( I \ { / ^/ / / ( /` / \ I t _ _ _ _ PHS DELINEATED w gg $• • ( { / f J / / ) ' t ' r / /1 1' ' l!JI ^ r / ( / i � I� Ir` / / ED 3) 1 / / / / ( / 1 f kJ / ^k � y� 1 ) i• \ /'1 / / / / / EXISTING )/ ; / / ( ,,,� i• 1',i / /1 ) ° �/ /-� - / - _// ) - 811 I)/ I, 11 1 1 / / / )! ( / / I PLAYGROUND r( j ' / \, 1 .?� �.yyl�I ri r / / ,r I PHS DELINEATED WETLAND 0 / / ; \ — — 7 // // lI) ( 1 -\ \, �_ \1 \ /J . N / � ..4., �� G\ a] � / , �'�\ L- \.�- J •L/I / / /s) LJLINEATED WETLAND t` GSWING$ 1 i 1 -� ° o • /,1-•� / / t �' rt, \ / �- i,�'/, ° nW��j _. 'r _ C% \ \fr/ '{ �-� ' ` �µ PB POINT OF BEGINNING r '., , f ( < 1 11 1 j f / \�^ �✓/T °�y1�,�� P /��r%/t u � 1 .� �'i� ; _ 1 !+'•,�o „ / O O \� \ PC POINT OF CURVATURE o ( l ( \ I a M, , . ryll �*_,.,• ��%'1 4 , Q. P/�� • \ I PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE V J `•< 4_ I 1 A N/ I P�A v ` J J PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE ( ) ( \ ° / / . .L �.=1 �� .� i r !, 11 rl r-_ 1 \ `/ �. I ♦ ��Pj ' \ r \.._.. ` ., \ / 'r -'i-Il� _ PT POINT OF TANGENCY z , ff --.SP- ) 1. /" / ,--� / 1 J PB \ .. �• _ / —V I / , A / 1 I ) . _ _/�I' /! _ V `,/, LENGTH W '0/ 1 ,, ) °/ J 1 \ / Eat 8410D9a52 \ {� .-r� / { ';� I I 1 ( / ) ) -/// /i ALIGN m /�� / / N i FrxN $8 v >.`''' �` V0 1� of ? //(� ) ) �) /—( �/ ) )(/� I��\ �Ia 1 j m ( 941W.nz5 J \ V� � V ,.....a/ ( ) / 1/ • c' - / -/ /// -) 0 I \ ( ) 1 East Baae.3992 FASTING/NORTHING OCt - ( I N. .. 3L100K8961 r 1 �.� d V � , ►i r I > I ./ / / / ,-, Myth 32=2.275 SURVEY COORDINATES / PRC i tR. `, /,°•.I�,, �� `��I / / / J / /) f/ - (J (/ ) / ,,,.-\ \ �6 �ti P © v "�''�' � / / / / ( / I \J ( // ( LAYOUT NOTES: Z r / I East e413Ds3v \ i. Y,,. l� .,. \ 1 - - - JI ` ( ° / / North 322957. \ \ !\), T'' ;` ' I , / /f \/1 , r / - 1{,/ \ J ` I / (q v/ 1. ELECTRONIC DIGITAL AUTOCAD FILE SHOWING g d i. �� 1 1 / t 4 - . _ ,� `^ ' l �, LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS / / PC lit f•:• / / / / / .� ' ., �I �'. ' ,� / / l I( ) tom _ - / l Cl- ,.;I� _ r / ' / I �/- AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRURION STAKING / , \ / '= 1 J(rJ i �// <\. ( // / PURPOSES. Q a l —/ _. l J , Fart w P.245 !' '� • / ° ( J /I ! ( J ( , t / // / p \ /C///)I (- Y Li) o / / ` I North ..,.a4u/ ) 4'i" �. ` ,L4 I ri / -/ / / , / J J G // ! OUQ ?CURVE INFORMATION/ / / / /� �� '"' G _ / �- A �/� Jj/\ / CURVE CURVE CURVE Q Q Z / / J I `l Ii =`! ��' - ^ NUMBER CENTERLINE RADIUS LENGTH LL • / ✓ / 'l i�� / / `,tf' 1 Ppp� / j11Is-.:. \ J _ % �./ \ I `� / /J� 1Q 116.89' 32.78' f / ., it N. \ ) / / ! V / / :!Y. s- (-\- l N. - , J / C'l \/1\ \ 7- I ' I "��--t��" / �o / / \` \ /I/ / ,% .. -�>\r111s. , --.:,/�// / \ , I / 56.10• 2s.v' EXISTING CONCRETE �^ _ ^ 4M1.78' 25.16' _ _ _ BASKETBALL COURT I I; ..°:�W.81 Q. \ ,�°,w &`-/ \ {`�I/ ` / l/f /J/ of / I - - __ - - -- - - 1 / / / ""-'' �i /�� / !,:'�jl,�`�ti // 1 lh�/ f\( /% l/- \ Ir�� 1 1 Q 147.32' 27A4' i i ) I l/ •"I1` ' 7IREV-7`'� \t -\_/ ,� 6 / - 7 � r \ / ` \ t / / / / Ndrth 84 0.7585 �` \ Ar, °° j. ! ._ / _ . _ .4J��'/ �. / j / / / / // / / / / i• \\.) / 6, J / -1( \I ,�� 1 i-10 ( /y°-/ / %/ // // ; %� w't �'v' /- --/. - . - / / )//� / IJ / J/JJ // /�/ 1 ( (1/ / �/ / / / / // // / / l ' / `�. ',.- .. �� / / // // - - - , / / /i/�// �-r J-, ✓1// --- -- --' tit ''' / ---- ..A,,,=,/ ( IIIr 0 / / / ///% /� r---// t7. ,�'44, .. _ . „.;., / / / / _. / / /� / / _ I' �, /I / //� � / // /�// /%% ry9/ //" r / .L /'it.°o % _ _ .Jr//r/'tNA/// i�/- % /�// .�1 L. J / ( i / / / � / // // !/ /1 / / � /_1_ r� yi A , / JI/ /f / / // — J �/ 1 1 / 1 :. _ / _/ Q /� DATE: 111LY31.1012 ) II/ 7 /j / // / / , /// / /�� J iJ/� - - -��.r ° /# ' " �- //,'��//��/' 'i , ` PROJECT ND: 1103 l / l J //////'Y�.� / /// /^,,, -- 1i- - -9�2/3 ` 2 his,: rJ/�/r//,�/ '/ /l J .i 1\ J I S 4 ! /, / / // // - /, - - \ { - - ! — 5 .i� / ---/ /� / / / 1 r DRAWN: T9 -,I ) N1 / t l / / / .,,/ . ///� j / _ a &26/ /4 / o Sa // %/J �// / l 1 CHECKED: w / ) ( / , ) { / // �/ / /) �J/� / / ) _ _�! 'y -�- ( ( �xl r // // } / � / / 9ENADNs: / / / / I/ ( / ) i ) )41) /! (- --Ni J • / / / s.�� r y ---- / / 1 • it •R: E2 / ( /* ( 1 / f // a J l l/r-i 0! ' I' 2" / � �j `_ / / !`�.4 . x — / 1 r / / / r r /i /c �l �/f--, -` — i �' ° i 4/f I' ii. Imo" / —— /—�—' f�r e f/I (' i ' zi - - I I�'r�• /fir' DESIGN • S / �/ ( / J MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET L4.1 � � // // 1 / / \ / / ( r ) / .f///</ // O////(, J / / / -/-d: I /, : a5P/, r / / 0 _ / -- 1 ^ DEVELOPMENT SHEET Nl1ME-i 0 10 20 40 7.7'1 L4.2 GRADING LEGEND 1 J / / /q,• / � � r--� l � � /i�/- /i i / -.zit I / //' / / j /� ✓�/,/2�� \ / `4/ - f / �15— ./ i/ / �J /� // _ _ PROPERTY UNE a / \. ( / / / / /J / � - - () } r // / I i _ - - _ PHS DEUNEATED E i-- VEGETATED CORRIDOR Si r({(/ I / 0 1, / / (((/l� .>��; 1 (fir /^ • 1 / /• o I/ r--'• _/-�. •*PT � e j/ // VEGETATED CORPREVIOUSLY RIDOR I ® A // > f / / \ ( I 1 / / / //� /` ) / MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET L5.2 - - - al� TDL. .o`/��/ ^ // / PHS DELINEATED WETLAND JI / /// J / 1 J 1 \ I/ /, / •,I - /• Jir / / // I. I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND -)- t t I l J// l /f / /C. - 1// ,/ `/ //• •' r�F/ J %Z,5/ • / -/. / . '1�5 / — — _ _ — — us 1` ` •.._. ( f (/ } ((f/ •. -._////�/ / I C I``� -. .� /// ��/ �. Lam. /� / — ` PROPOSED CONFOUR 1 1 \ \\ { /r /� J /\�( \ �J/ j 1 1... .)f - - -_ . l -`! /,// j� ��/ / .� - ��, i i`- '— ` — ` 1 - - N / / I- / �•/ '�• . /i i230 ` - 155 - EXISTING CONTOUR J 7`//t/7- ze,% J J//j///(/�� / /, //�: /i�j r2//// /, / �� - - - `- \ 2305 z o /l! �rir>`�/ /' ' �/�// cr. ^ 1- •WETLANDD //% /J�4/j � / / /,//j//- r — — _ _ PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION z L0 CLJ ++ Iro f / J ( / / i// // / j/ �� . (230.5) i - J /)!/ {J� / I ` / %�/// / // / / � `\ EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION,V.I.F. LU V /j% %/i/JAI /t' () e../ ),!J 1 /�� Jj/////�/jj jZ. ,/ �/ „ . // J / / INTERPOLATED SPOT ELEVATION,V.I.F.V.LF. /--,j/�i i //) I ( ( /f`•.‘ r- - _/. ! CC / ✓// ,///// j/ // GB Z co / i / GRADE BREAK Q 7/// )/ / /--_L/rJ/S .0 7- G/ - / / ,r. /// �j. yr ; - / „,. �// \ Z 2 l' ) / /— -�-- — / �. \ f //� / / /// \ (� MATCH MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION J f0 1'/ / /I/ //r��/\ y- `. _mac\ -4 I7 • J /��///�/. J // /, • f j, J\ V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD < [ App. A /�f!(// //�� (�� - - - _ ./� /F• _F``// I///. /• / // r. �, i/ j" - 1� OF SLOPE AND PERCENTAGE V O'�, � � / ,,,_ ,..L., ,, (/// /�//� 'o Il 7. // `/-/!//�/j//. p . _ o .a- SILT FENCING _ Y Ln ( l f • / �_ /%/ii/ //% //ram/� / Q Z Q i////t" �/j ti /\ /• // /'- TC TOP OF CURB U 0 /�i• }/ {/ / i _ j^- - ./. f. /�;7--„ / .4, �, ; BC BOTTOM OF CURB (C (,,1 = u • I I JI �-) -/ j//\�i �--/7"r/jf,-11 / TC(33.99) TD TOP OF DECK OF BRIDGE h /r/ 7 J Or// / , // 0 33.79 /BC(33.51) (}/ f ) y.� . \.,. /Y / .-jj` -'/ % // / /!� /.,. /9J I� l• 33..• GRADING NOTES: / / /// '�> �� //. /' / 03 33.69 TC=BC . / / 1 1.1r 1. EXCAVATION AND GRADING REQUIREMENTS PER +� // '' n y GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT DATED \ ( I / / r;,� //j j�/ / I -- //jam �• ;T '2 33.731 JANUARY 2012,BYGEOTECHNICS L1C ir _5\�`\ - _J_• /// / j/// 7/ / J `i / / IIIL 2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SPOT ELEVATIONS ' / • -,-• \ - \ TV F&R PROVIDED AT EDGE OF EXISTING PARKING LOT /��( / `� / PAVEMENT WHERE TRAIL CONNECTIONS ARE { \ I ( / // // / / / . . /• // TC(34151 MADE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK { l/ / STATION 50 .� \`� \�•` //// 1/�( 1 1r / // j , ® ,� _' BC133450) I( Q i; 1 `i I�.111 •I r(It 1O(// / /// � • ' 1, _ -.__ Bc(34.061 ` 3. PROJECT CLEARING A MEET AND BLEND INO GRUBBING WITTH EXISTING SITE . AT \ \I\1 \lit III �1//1( // / � / / //• c`� ,1 Ir0 1TC 135A51 ` '/ rr11 1 II BC(34601 4. ALL TRAILS AND PAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE \; ' l'I f(.((J I 1(t/// / / / j� 3 1' ;ill "` t0 SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS ELEVATION 1`\ .\-- >'/'�I / /// / — CHANGES,WITHOUT SAGS,DIPS OR PUDDLES. o I jl( 111 ( i�� •I� �I/ /l11 / //�// 3�/ ` d .:t �� 0ALL� D AREAS SHALL HAVE POSRIVE q/ 11 fill{Y II 1/ 1/// / / / /' / i /� r� 5.60� l 5. PROVIDE JUTE NETTING ON ALL SLOPES WITH A 1 / w'rt: iuLr 3i,wu )' III'11�I• �j f I11// / ry / / / 1 / �` / �� GRADIENT OF 3H:IV OR GREATER.STAPLE (( (/ ) l` • ,(11(/ / / / / I/ / / NETTING T00 GROUNDO WITH METAL STAKES AT 3' Mg1ER xo: i1D9 ( 1.. ''///((t ( / / / /1 / /'~ 36 • J Q.C.MAX. 1 ly 35. • DMwlk re \` \ L / ! / / / I i 6. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANTING BED CH6CII6D: u1 \ \ — \ /, / �,t I ` \ ` � �1_ / ;F y� O f BC� 83 / SOIL DEPTHS AND PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. ti /i' / ` N. \ — —1 —PBS ="� �+..r�� - �-`i� a f i 8iiI �� o o �,,�� .��.\ jmi DESIGN o ' o i \- ..,..: ... Imo.. • f� DEVELOPMENT - - - - - -- _ f . SHEET NUh13ER f \r _.....• — y _ 0 10� - - - - - _ _ SW WALNUT STREET L5.1 / A 1 1 / / / /' �/ '/ '. ,1 / GRADING LEGEND } ( 1 ^—I �� \ vvvv A / /� / ( // / / I �� v 1/ i //JIl 11 . ( / /_ r l ( .\ 1 I / / I ( j l / } ( f I V( ^ (�I _ _ — PROPERTY LINE R / Nf �} 1 / ) / - A� � \ I / I } / / ( / 1• // / � l ��(l r j1, (VI 1 \ _ _ - _ PHS DELINEATED XE¢ / / / /(4 /, / I ( I ) I \ I / ^/ /� ( ' 1 i( J// I VEGETATED CORRIDOR i 8 8 1 • ( f'/ / J ( / j� - j . / J 1 ) ( I J j / I v / /- ` i I / / ( ! 1" -I• - " //, I(1 / I / \III PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED j n555i t N I/ I ( / h jt�y�1 I / ' ( / / / ( J 1 S / / / / . I �/ �/}Ii v / / VEGETATED CORRIDOR . i I V I h I / / / ( 4 tea! PLAYGROUND • J/ J j i j ' 4 4. i rJ/ l/ i • / --/".l/ J - ST I(/ ( r PHS DELINEATED WETLAND '• / / I / / ( _ / / -'( ( } .E T ,: 44 `•, �// / E _f 1 / --//l . I / i / f \__ _ j I.,1, f� - �,,. - v, o /d I- J f• {� \ �) _.— r `� / ` \ ` ` �i l r\ I r';I ." ,4v::' ^ / `/ I / J / I - - •I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND // // J I 1 ,/'-",- -v-\ r/ i ( :i,;►,�,� �,_ •'c �%'WH ' '' 4 . _ �\ --_lG}-�} ISM t --_� L C- ^ �' /EXJSANG SWINGS I / C H'C�20� l� =_� �\ +,- '. • ) i - R' - / Iim. rri,r•LI 2�i �,ir-�^ PROPOSED CONTOUR /1 ( / ‘V i, °� !a J 1 HCi�I - r�I'.r II l� �•s _ .° �":• �� . �/A- EXISTING CONTOUR I- \ o I / Qzsa „ I ili.t•_ RAIf P64 /i 0.,..-.. �',J'lllT.; �_� — T55— — \ • ^ / I �t =� J /� ( /•�- - A e I 230.5 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ZLLJ O a (230.5) W u / . -11 \ i / i 2 ,6 rw o / OJ ) J i1 o EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION,V.I.F. (/) / �, / / / *I ,, 1 �� r- ( J ) ) r / • c / l //l( 1> I v I\V• L r +� 0 CC / ( R° l / ��I�►�� ' , ) ' - / / - l / ' ' \ \ r/ 1 J INTERPOLATED SPOT ELEVATION,\ IX ° ( / / / / CC c \\ l` :4/ f .k \ ( l/ / / ) )/ J l ((l `t / _ ,.'-. Z )r Ir , 1 1J I ,� / p, \'MAX \ I �1,/,�/�•��t�, / CI- C13 • ( / / / / 1 I I `I /^ \ 4 e ) i- GB GRADE BREAK Y / J ""�a ►'I" / ( I / 2 4 7 / / I \V A ' �\;; ��4,4 /,J�//( 1 r/ 1(✓ A J I / (� MATCH MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION CL 2 qtlID I / / ( / \ \ vy �"�. lep ` Fr r 1 ( �Q� \i } \ / V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD Q (� / v /1111r/ ( I i1"• " `'' ' 7�I l / J/- 2% DIRECTION AND PERCENTAGE O Q YU } / ( I / / /�� r.. \ _.wv / - /Gram( ,— j// ' <` (///41 / OF SLOPE Z re a L� / �/ _ , \I ( / � V�. � .>.. c (�( j l /r Sim/ o /c Al' + 0 I— 0 I I IF / ' J / .> J \.\ //i \1 SILT FENCING Y Q O /J / /' /� I // / / )I "�� , . wl�'�`1, 1/ ;. �/ //% �//` o o G -N.�J//(r J/ ` I, TC TOP OF CURB = O Q 1 U r ,,(( _ r n / tJ / / /./- 0 I >, / h / T�'/IY/ lM\ �I =y�l�%��I ..:?F I �F I_• _ / �/; J // ,T O / ) ,I`\ BC BOTTOM OF CURBV U/ if illy/ / / � .(_\- /\ //%`�/ '/�/1\ TD TOP OF DECK OF BRIDGE ?- I I I ` �i' + ` ►►�I _ \� �'I\1 ' /�/ / ' / / / -' GRADING NOTES: / 1 EXISTING CONCRETE I I ( / ``‘P,Ot,�rI� / '� /_W LA�&C. f (�\ �' � / / / ( 1. EXCAVATION AND GRADING REQUIREMENTS PER _ _ _ BASKETBALL COURT ' I ( / � ''"' `/- _ / ,I /J J./ \ / /f // Ir/_l J of J J I __ — _- 1/ I 4/ I / T7 „_ ' ' Ij �te � /I� i / )/ // / r,._ /\ I \ JANUARY 2012,BYG EOTE H REPORT DATED \ ,r.1 1i /__/ / / / .y / 1113 f 1 'ti ` i _ ' _- o JANUARY 2012,BY GEOTECHNI6 LLC. \ 1 ) / / / 1i. / ., " �__ _ T 'S'y .,1 2 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SPOT ELEVATIONS / / / / / 'rC, "q A\�?-'/1!3?o zo/ 3" I /�, t - - T '� �-�•� PROVIDED AT EDGE OF EXISTING PARKING LOT \ / / / / / / / / / �� .(' `J� i / / \ - PAVEMENT WHERE TRAIL CONNECTIONS ARE / / / / / / 4k /- // / - /- / 1"--/ 1 J i MADE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. ( I 1111 ( /// / // / / / / #1.1.72‘..44.,..4....,,,. ..... � �/ ^{• \ % �/ /j% / IJ / J//l �� /// 3. MEET AND BLEND WRH EXISTING STIE GRADES AT I.�� / / / / / / // // j-- . \,,., ' / lk / /- •I / / / / // / r , J( // PROJECT CLEARING AND GRUBBING UMIT. . \-. / // / 11)/ // / /// // /^�/ •�y, ., / i / _ _ / _ / l / / / // ^ J ( ( 4. AL LTRAILSANDPAVEDAREAS SHALLHAVE / - / / / / / // � 2 r�. lfj+. - - - •� ` - / / // / / /7 .� SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS ELEVATION / / // �/ 3 - �° / / �, J r- / ,/ / • --� CHANGES,WITHOUT SAGS,DIPS OR PUDDLES. , /r 7 / // // (r / • ( ,o °_ - ) / / J Y / /r J ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE POSITIVE I ( \, / I / ' „NV / / / le 9/ ////�ii) C / 4. 1„f�- o . �' / / �/�/// r J / / 1 DRAINAGE. r 0 r\5. PROVIDE JUTE NETTING ON ALL SLOPES WITH A MTE: NAN 31,2012 J�/� 21Y 'Nk / / // / / GRADIENT OF 3H:1V OR GREATER. STAPLE / go/ r� /� /// / / / / J J/ "/p-�r -' //// �J� / /I / NETTING TO GROUND WITH METAL STAKES AT 3' �D� \ r / / f / / ///' /// / . * \ -t ti• - -1- s.' .. i// r�//�/J/ / / � J^ J O.C"MAX. DRAWN: TB `t / / / / /i i �' �// / J 1 ' 6. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANTING BED [NECKED' I ( \ ` \ I ( / // / / 1,;"--.' ///I - /' • /( r / / i/ /�, J / / ) SOIL DEPTHS AND PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS. REVISIONS: ( / ) / AllI // ( -_�/— J )/ /'-" / / o - r — 11,,,,<, , i . � — // / / ! /* ( l I l j/ / Imo/1J j('- /. ` / %, r,"':%'. )) -�/ � *%177,� - - �.� 7 // / / c. 1 I ) I / / / \ (21/1 / , -/--i t. . . . •'�X ;'(�; ___, !/.\ ill :�� —L DESIGN / / r '�'—T • J/� // !/ / - - MATCHLINE-SEE SHEETLs.1 � _ /; /II / / 2v6 \/ / • ) ( ( ) / / / / 1/ (� ///%( i / / / / da y` .,_,.. / / . J / / ri / I DEVELOPMENT SHEET NJm BEA 0 10 zo ao 711mir. "7 L5.2 U 3 I ♦f♦♦♦♦fff♦ - / / LEGEND = f k / ♦4ff�Of�f�f�f�O�f�f�f��fO� / = $ j / ♦ffffffffffffffffffffffffff♦ / ./..... V • ♦ff♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•f♦♦♦♦� I PROPERTY LINE �� : ..i / f♦ffffff♦ff♦ffff♦f♦fffflff•� /I / ___ n ..`E i . ♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦f• fI — PHS DEINEATEDm a,/ I ♦•♦♦f♦ ♦♦ f1♦' / / VEGETATED CORRIDOR �o♦ff♦ff ♦ff ♦♦ ii / 9 R 5 II ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ff1•,/ ♦f♦♦ffff♦♦ffff♦♦f� .♦ff1IIPREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHEDdPn gf♦♦♦ff♦♦♦f♦ff♦♦♦f �ff♦f�� / VEGETATED CORRIDOR $�f♦♦♦f♦♦♦♦♦♦ff♦ ♦♦♦11 / jff / / _ i♦ 1 ♦♦♦♦f♦f♦ / oi ♦♦ff MATCHLINE - SEE ��♦i� •♦♦♦♦Q�, I / PHS DELINEATED WETLAND �'"'"�� IA♦♦SHEET L6.2 ��♦�� ►�2�i♦f♦�► S // / *�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ` , 1.♦♦f♦f♦♦` "♦♦♦♦f♦♦f•••• / �1♦♦♦f♦♦♦f♦ff♦♦.♦♦f♦" /f♦♦♦� ♦f♦fff♦� / ! 1 PBS DEUNEATED WETLAND •q♦j♦♦♦♦♦♦�If • / .•f♦ i f♦♦♦ I— O ♦♦♦♦ .if1♦f♦♦♦ • • >.♦:♦:♦:♦�� -/ ♦�f♦ ♦♦j ♦��♦�♦�♦♦ I IRRIGATION LEGEND z ♦f♦♦♦f1♦♦ i♦ ♦ i >��•�•�1S�� TEMPORARY W / I - /• I�ff♦♦♦♦♦♦ i♦♦�f�f♦�♦•� ..i i i •a IRABRIGATION ARYVE CC i ♦♦♦ r••1♦ 1,7 / - s0� ��♦�♦�•♦�• .•♦♦♦♦♦♦00♦ / -•''-'�''t•l SYSTEM w ♦ ♦ • •DOS♦�♦i;•• / WETLAND D - �• ♦♦♦♦jam ��♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦f / PERMANENT IN of♦ffi ♦•♦• ♦ ffff♦♦♦f♦♦♦♦f� GROUND SPRAY li I� ♦f�• �1♦ ♦I�f�♦♦f♦f�♦♦♦IIf♦• ��// IRRIGATION SYSTEM LL f - / P.O.C. IRRIGATION• POINT OFCONNECTION 5 • •♦♦ �000�D�• ♦' ci- I , .cq .�♦i♦iO ♦♦f♦,• / Z a ♦f♦♦♦ JG _ %/ • ,j:::::i, �4A<% •♦�f.! I KEY NOTES Q �� ♦ . N f. ♦♦��♦�� ..•j�i+♦ r' REMOVE & REPAIR EXIST. IR SYSTEM AS Q LLB ~ % ��♦♦♦♦♦f♦/ ify.. REO. BY NEW WORK I ,r♦♦f♦j♦♦♦ff ♦f♦.4 �� O 0 O ♦1♦♦♦f♦♦♦f♦♦, .►♦f♦♦♦f♦i 1 EXIST. ABOVE GROUND TEMP IR SYSTEM TO U Q off♦ff♦♦♦♦j♦i ,�f♦♦♦♦♦♦� O BE REMOVED THROUGH OUT WEST SIDE OF (Y .- 11�♦♦f♦♦♦♦♦f♦i i♦♦♦♦♦f♦ff PROJECT. CAP AT EXIST. VALVE Q= ♦•♦♦f♦♦f� ♦♦♦f.G♦� SALVAGE SYSTEM FOR REUSE O U /i 7. ♦♦•f•♦•♦•♦•f♦i ,♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ j ♦/♦♦ff♦♦♦♦♦♦f• f♦f♦f , •♦♦♦,1♦♦♦♦ 3O 1 7/2" PROPOSED IR ONLY WATER METER ♦♦♦♦♦f♦♦♦♦f♦♦♦♦♦•f.♦f •�♦.f.i�♦.♦.f*♦�f� " �� 1D N iff♦f♦♦♦♦• ,If♦♦♦♦.♦ 11 • O PROPOSED CONNECTION TO WATER MAIN, SEE _J Z r ✓, ♦♦f♦♦f♦♦•i ,„ ff�v I 4 CIVIL DWGS. z a 1..i o I . \\/_ _ ,i‘o..•••••• •< :, ♦•�.' TVF&R %♦fO STATION 50 • ' �Q♦f ® � • (� I STAMP � ,r '' 1 1I / 1 O t I DATE: JULY 31. 2012 1 1 PROJECT NO: 1109 1 DRAWTL I 1 _ __ r CHECKED- LH 1 Ef �/ REVISIONS: ,,/ 333 iI _ , TI ,. - -- _ '� - J �- \_ w �i 1 • DESIGN J O DEVELOPMENT `1/ SHEET NUMBER 0 10 20 40 — - - - - _ _ — _ - _ SW WALNUT STREET �^ L6 . 1 M. / / •••,��•• LEGEND ♦.♦L.•♦♦•.♦•♦.♦♦♦•♦•♦.•♦2.45, 1 § e MATCHLINE — SEE 414416 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦••♦�••♦•;;;;�♦:: -♦♦41 .•.-..♦ ♦♦�♦•�♦�♦� ♦ ....•. PROPERTY LINE Y a r._ —SHEET L6.3 ` ��.♦♦♦♦•♦•♦♦♦�♦•♦♦♦•�•iii..i♦i♦♦i• r•♦ a `Q € ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦:..♦♦♦• - PHS DELINEATED 1 '♦♦•♦♦••••••.♦•♦♦♦•••♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦.��♦♦ �•♦♦ -- u '••♦♦❖•♦.�•••••••••♦•♦�♦♦�. - �.. VEGETATED CORRIDOR ?-�a A^ ..••••♦•�♦••�♦ PREVIOUSLY CORRIDOR ESTABLISHED c R-gg B �•♦.••♦•••♦♦•�♦•♦♦♦�♦•♦�♦•�1 I VEGETATED �P F �i •.❖.♦••♦••♦•♦••♦••♦♦♦•♦0 �Y a B 6 1 EXISTING �••♦•♦•♦�••♦•♦••♦••♦♦♦••♦4 V I-77 1 PHS DELINEATED WETLAND o - PLAYGROUND O♦•♦�•♦♦•♦♦D♦♦♦•♦�♦♦♦♦.♦•.1 �? _-_ o S y / I•••♦••�••♦•♦••�••♦♦�♦••♦•♦♦••4 I - 2 •'♦•••••♦♦••... ♦•♦••♦♦•••••••, r� I I.-- I PBS DELINEATED WETLAND • • 6 i l 14:41_ 'I / I EXISTING SWINGS I •• •�IWETLAND-A- • ` I IRRIGATION LEGEND 7� 0 \\ / 1 I �.�:�.� I •�.�.�:�:�� TEMPORARY ZED I \ / ' ♦•.♦•�•� ��♦�•♦ ABOVE GROUND WC 0 \ , ,♦♦•♦♦ ��:�:�i�i� IRRIGATION C.I i/ �•�♦�•P�- i♦♦♦♦♦i I SYSTEM D\ \ SYSTEM 0> -0 ;♦•�♦♦.♦♦♦.�♦♦•♦♦♦�♦ .14, 2 I , PERMANENT IN W Q' 1 \ \ I♦♦•♦•♦•♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦•♦♦♦� I //�/ IRRIGATION RAY \ • I I P.O.C.I IRRIGATION 7 \ \ I•♦♦♦♦•♦•♦•♦•♦❖♦•♦�♦•♦•♦♦� POINT OF �f I� \ \ .♦♦•♦•♦•••♦�♦••♦•♦♦♦•♦•♦♦♦•O / I CONNECTION < UI 0 • \ ♦• ••♦♦♦.•♦•♦•♦♦♦♦•♦♦.♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦❖♦�♦♦♦♦.♦♦•♦♦♦•♦� \ \ i♦•♦•♦•••♦•♦•••♦•♦•♦•••�•❖••••♦♦••♦•♦❖•♦•• •••••, / , 1 I 1 //i > iiiiii♦iiiiiiii•ii •i I--Q W �_ I 0 I i I t / I cL Q �. / .. cL - - 0:♦♦.A. n \ ` i♦i♦i♦iii!S- - p N cN \ \ ♦♦♦♦♦♦.� a L' z0m \\ âIf!IH zai -O7 -WETLAND 8 - po0- - - - BASKETBALL COURTI♦♦• .♦♦--, • •• .v.-4 ••••. ♦♦♦•� a v)a / 11:11111:47::!4:7_ •H----• / / ETLAND /• / - 1 STAMP . ♦♦♦ •• e / / I �••••♦••,/ / 1/ ••Q •♦♦♦� ' / DATE: LILY 31. 2012 / 1.•-+_ •�•...♦.•♦♦ I I / PROJECT NO: 1109 • / / ••••♦•••♦❖♦•♦♦.♦♦.♦♦.♦•♦.♦♦•..•••♦♦Ii 1 DRAWN: TL • _ _ ♦♦1♦•1♦♦ ♦.♦♦♦♦♦ • / I CHECKED: LH / I •••.•♦•...• I♦..♦♦� REVISIONS: itiI . ♦♦♦.♦.♦♦i I♦♦♦♦♦•♦• ♦♦♦♦ •,.. .. It•` DESIGN • / , MATCHLINE - SEE L �•�•�•��' •i••�•�•��• I / / / SHEET L6.1 \ / �••••• ••♦•••♦° I DEVELOPMENT SHEET NUMBER 0 1a 20 ac =^ 1 L6 . 2 LEGEND —--— PROPERTY UNE S § a ———_ PHS DELINEATED a` I VEGETATED CORRIDOR a 't � PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED o VEGETATED CORRIDOR -o $ • 8 p E55 PHS DELINEATED WETLAND a a $ J5 0 PBS DELINEATED WETLAND 'o o I I Ir / 1 r IRRIGATION LEGEND / I I 111�� A TEMPORARY I— ,0 ( / ,W♦ ,1,41: 44 IRRIGATION GROUND z •...„•�• SYSTEM W N L_ PERMANENT IN ! U \ r GROUND SPRAY P.O.C.NG \ I j///� IRRIGATION w . ��.. SYSTEM O 6 \ . I/ Ip,0,0, IRRIGATION�—\ ��` Ir POINT OF 0 _ ` _ CONNECnON 7 _` _�' - _ I 0- I ---- Exlsnwc J IRRIGATION ��TT 0 MAINLINE L� 0_ r 1 �� I -O V I KEY NOTES j < L_ \� 0 / ` _ ` I O EXISTING IRRIGATION STUB OUT Q w if r / �� _ I P.O.C. FOR TEMP. IRRIGATION ON O 1 _ ` _ I O THIS SIDE OF STREAM0 Q - - --) n-- cy -Da_ 6 • r i l / 1 I EXISTING BASEBALL FIELD N I/ / 0 ¢ J Orn0' r / • 41 N _ ` r P.O.C. © waM ir�a o• Zw MZN 1 zap M�4/ I w DM r / • a r-a r 11 �•�•��•�•�•r�1•1�. r /�/ 1 STAMP 1�1�1�>�1�1��1�1�1�1�1111��1�1�� N.../ I i�%^i�*:.).i1i�i�il1:i i.••i••:/ ...�.A.�♦�.�.�.�♦1��1 1 DATE JULY 31, 2012 r 11'11111111111111' .��/�::::::(��1�:�� ::: 1 I PROJECT N0: 1109 li• / ♦11111.11111111111111; ♦1•11•11i1•/11111111111111 DRAWN: TL I 111171�� CHECKED: LH 1111111111111111111111 ��1119♦11111111111111111W .♦:::.,;::`:::::::4:::±:::::::`::::::::::::::::....' 1 REVISIONS: i11/11111111111111111111111 I 111•11111111111111111111111 / �11♦1111111111111111111111� .�.��.`11.1♦11�1�1��•�•1•1•1•1•1•1•1�1�1�1�1�1�11�4i r111111��1•j11�1�1111111•111•�1�1�1��1�•�•�•••1•.1�• 111�1♦11111111111111111111� ♦11•"1111•1•••••• 11111• 11111111 M ATCHLINE S SHEET L6.2 '`,1;��1:1:1�1;11��1i1i�i.ili.i�l:i�i�i� 1�1�1`�� 7 DESIGN • �� •-i-i-iiiiiiiiiii:�i�i-4.4:�2.•,..4 DEVELOPMENT `L./ SHEET NUMBER D o zD 4D �1 L 6 . 3 PLANTING LEGEND i / J / /' / / / c. \ - I - 5 / / / — - - PROPERTY LINE < 1 p /J 1 / I / / / / / / //. - _ • 4\. \ \. \ ♦ %'' /'(— / / / / / PHS DELINEATED g ai / / ` l // / l / / / (J / / / \- \\. \ > • (� , / } / i--- / — — — VEGETATED CORRIDOR e �` 1 ( / / ( // / J , — 1 / \ \\ \ .� r — `,►� • r / / PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED ggI /� — \ \ .,,y�f.y iy�� / VEGETATED CORRIDOR .g '� . /� ( G /•( / / / .>� J /r//i- �I- . / _ (/\�\\\ \ \ \\�./ - - •/ • - / .1� e ,( / / _ _ z m // 1 ' / / ' / \ ( ))/) / / / //� f ) \.MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET L7.2 - // �QO1 N � d� /i / / — -I PHS DEUNEATED WETLAND3i / / �_ ( / L )' /i •y..y� �'. / �0�� {� ` / rt —� / l \ / ) / -1///(</ // ) ////(, J \ \ -/- }. s' / d,.s 1**`a / / / 1 /' / / 1 1 / / / / r 1 /J —' I t ,�. - \. \\ ,� / - / /0�'.0-r 00 // - / PBS DELINEATED WETLAND / > I / / ( ( /� E - / - \. �/y r' / // a>.",• / -}'�-�J� / ( I S )/J IIjJ // /i� /%J / .. \• \. /�.�• J �-'z`5/ o'o'; :' ..0**e/�v/ / l = L l\ \ r r, } I (/ ., / / / \\ , r G. ' i-/_� / s`s:.,-.'-�' a .„, / — — — — (n -,.. ID H \7 / /� :- � J / / 1 5 �r / /'/ •' ♦Y *i'O�Q• � % -- �— — — — — — �'— --� , -, PROPOSED TREE PLANTINGS c r/ ✓Jr///f G— / J/ /( �� //�'J / /� / / ♦!'•'. a .p�oaA i i�f — — — \ w •+' / ��//!j ./,_----,-------- J// r r-^ "f / / /i / O.!A0 �/ — — — — \ �. /:.•i CO r- �� `/ r WETL6NDD _ _ / / / / L. r►49P♦♦ •: // - tia eS stie PLANTING AREA / // /( -T // / / C / ( / - - -�' • //// /�/ // �// : �<•440/,.� %/ \ egfee�,.�eeee1eii OJ //I/�(�J ) ( ) / / 1 / / - /- // •�/ `/// / //�.��' ��p♦♦ 'l /'„ j BIOSWALE PLANTING O CU 2' ///1-/)/ / i J/ ) / / �, ° ) ' /i�•1 j/ ////�//��.�♦,.. _ • ei'�eAO�. / 77 l/ / J / 1 J ( ( /� �- -/ 4/ J - ,/ / ,ty.P// �.o �e `ic '��.S / /// \ \ \\ VEGETATED CORRIDOR 1J/lp////r / —� J / —_// I d N. 1/J l//// pJ� ��,r�` / �✓/ \\\\\ PLANTING AREA&MITIGATION _1 Y // / / / //r-/�/ / � , L /—�/-/ /r,�..e• /� - S / ROUGHWWN 0 cC 12 / I Ai v /l / ////� / 44 ♦ / /✓ :: LAWN REPAIR �//jam //////!p \ /%'� '/ d /')////i�h�'''*� _.vI• -- o ( (//�� ) ( I- / _ . \ /.0 '/ -'"',stag. ��yaj a Q uQ ` KEY NOTES J Q U / / / /✓ f'_/,j //// ♦ 4 ��. �L„ NO TREE PLANTINGS WITHIN 6'OF TRAI4 f �-- --. __ BRIDGE,OR PROPERTY ONES. PLANT ONLY Or • ,I. r 1 , ��T._./. . . .r. / %/ -y�-/. %� �•��OO ,`��ib Will r Q LOW SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS. \x , \ J / �,/ .fir/�/i%// � �•//'1', ¶ftqA ��/, 1 • \l\ - .J' /// /// // //\v`� �%// y •-- )+V _ TVF&R PLANTING NOTES: i } -�-I I/ �� / ` �. � �� 1. REFER TO SHEET L$.3SITE DETAILS FOR PLANT ( �11 /�/ ( // / / / * �/ / STATION 50 .\ \ `I \\ 4 ] lI/1�l// // ///�" w-4 •0 �.-.�./. 'r- y , .:..;� f 0 SCHEDULE. %\ l )k 1'' 1,) 1-1(J�rl/l((II / / / /` '"'��t7j Y '"' s \ 2. VERIFY LOCATION OF PRIOR TO OIL PREPARATIONGPROTECTALL TREES TO REMAIN \ (h ))/JI/ // / /j / ,l.�'It;/� / f TREESANDSHRUBS INDICATEDTO REMAIN. \ �\( , /11) Ill 1 I(/r I// / / / / /i r'.' . - �� ` � �� t� COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER'S 1 1 ` 7 f l ` ` ��/ /�� l le / A L REPRESENTATIVE. c I i((\'e t (uj // .I I/ �/ / / / t� := .''' �-'� ��/� ! � 3. CLEAN PLANTING AREAS OF ALL CONSTRUCTION f ! ,,_ �/ �'//�r //f. • �� —� MATERIAIS,INCLUDING IMPORTED ROCK,TOTHE (( IIIIY II (/ %II/ I / / / { y " iif/ . `;�` ei4 © SATISFACTION OF THEOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE BEGINNING LANDSCAPE WORK. OAIE: iDLv31,2012 ,c 1I) 1 11)1111 (I J(III/ / e / / I 1 i - / ;'` No ��D� r (/ ) 4 ,. '(I/// / / / / / i/ / �� DRAWN B ' f t/ ,/\\ k//I/I/ l / // // /4 /.�/ tN / -" ..:.`f O••-• CHECCED: LH REVISIONS: / \ .. .1hee es,..a%wee4'!$iFe e Z j.14:1$0..Z.XEi:4.444.: N ---------------------"i ° v 'ita ail "' . 0 � — DESIGN 0 = p - _ - \ DEVELOPMENT • E SHEET NUM6eh — — — — SW WALNUT STREET I L7.1 \ • \‘ • \ \\. \ I� `\\ I ' 1 /// r � o ''. LPLANTING LEGEND \ ��. 1 /Ir.,.. �� \ 1, MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET L7.3 �r / f \ �' � \' �L. ' I - - PROPERTY LINE / / ) , / \ ` I / f ' / / `/ !\ \ \. y '• F� a4 ��/ `\/ — _ _ — : 5 ;; ED SETA EORR a 'VT • ( f / � ( / 0 r 1 (/ /) I / / / • �\ \ \ - / / ` \ i^. ( / 1 / / ! ► \ !! �{I/ \ /It R $ 3 1 k I / I ` ( OUSTING )/ ) / �♦j l / / .% ^\\ \�\ \. / - .)/ ) . III/ ( r r / / ! ( / / PLAYGROUND / / �� d ��_ A ✓ - - PHS DELINEATED WETLAND / / ) 1 / r a J( ) ` 1\ ) j ` `�\ 'iir7�I \. \\. c' - `11 / Q (III • �_ . .--..1 55 1 ; ". �' psi_!*--04t- ♦ 'D I, \ /� _ / /� • -9re,:* !. J I I- f / / / ( 1 1 �♦� \ / 5 �, '`% � i.'iri'I% .. A - L }-l^ /i{ , �1 / IL_ J PBS DELINEATED WETLAND /./ / , ) / \ y / \ \ r( :�' j A �. �1�►+�� ►�Il� nay �, -`\� .wEr✓a A� I \(ll f— / ( � d . �/ ,fr -� i (�EX�ING SWINGS , c , -. •f, �:! 'r . .- J' / _ 4 1. / ` r . ` I / 1 i �dJ • i /� . o o ‘4\.. 1 / I S. om . NIL _ �_ ,.ir !� y I `I`, // •1` \ 1/1.11/ J - • PROPOSED TREE PLANTINGS\ l� o ) ( f ( \V i' / / ,. y%„ - �A , li �,1�; �i) II �iri�I0A. A4. ) C _ 1-1,,_ o } -ri �� ri z O \ r ` ; . V _ .) • I iriyrirrrrrre PLANTING AREA SW ....7 /+/ / / , \ - / , ! _ 7 I I �, - �_~/ - /I ` / Srl rrlr rNrrN L L1 d \ / ri ti r . S,f, ` O ro� // `. .._ : -Ike •�`i� of (,*.: - / OJ 1 / ( �`\ a`\�;� / I 1 / /\ \\ ? o BIOSWALE PLANTING N/ / / .*0 ��A � r ) A-\� /) / / OA \V� J A VEGETATED CORRIDOR CC C /) cn > J ) 1 ,.,,M : k, / ._ ek. \ \, �' I// `� /� \ / \\\\\\ ENHANCEMENT&MITIGATION ZA•' ( `♦ V- • \ f I 1 / ` • /�-�- \�\\\ PLANTING AREA Qio / -...„....:.:.:.:.. .::., -J:4 ,fx.1 k I' r i , `� l 1.0� �; a.� \ \. r/ I / (�° r ROUGH U1WN�> 6 1 v/ /tie// / ', as ','/.f�.`.� mo ' \ \\\\ r III j — / 1I �/ t� cc 72s- '� .. .. •� \ . -_J a// (\ti l/./ LAWN REPAIRa CO/ / / / / �.,I � �,_ // J ' ) // J KEr NOT>s Q/ / / I l za• • �J ��, ' �/� / NO TREE PLANTINGS WITHIN 6'OF TRAIL, ( U / / / / // I I l l ';I/�I,p 1`\"` f �/i r:.A �L��\� /- F // /-� O / f/d\. O BRIDGE,OR PROPERTY LINES. PLANT ONLY � �, / � � / `�}' { e i�,-P � _ /. _ . / �" � - � // - j '� LOW SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS. • _ �/ ' ). / / .. : \ \ ll/ J / / / T �' 10,4t _:".„ N. • (-\- \��1 ///t'(� I 1 /I\ I 1 ' . ♦ ��' \`��_ ''.E L J s\ \ cl I PLANTING NOTES: O(ISTING CONCRETE I / / •�/,q `� WLAryn El. -� (l/ ) / /� /// // • - BASKETBALL COURT ' I / ..,. F�\411;;.►i �, 414.111i1 �. . J . - \ 1f\ / ✓\\�, J I/�f— \ I i ) / ` , - - ---- -- �, I __/ / / / � ` ,•�4�i�JJr 'M _ �- \ f�)/ ` �/ / L r�_ \ 1. REFER TO SHEET LB.3 SITE DETAILS FOR PLANT (� I 1/ J J 1 / �_7- ...�;y��a1s,�:, /,z i ,„, . •\ _�� r ��7 �__ \ i_. .� /l / (' //� \''' SCHEDULE. L ` / / / ) / / I ."A., .I \Qii.,.r o// •1 -'f . - .../ \ �i - T. — t. I T _4J: D\ / / / -.< • �� \0 \ \ • - - / ?/ '+T 2. VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN / \ ` / / / /// / / / / V��,��i 4 C / - _ \ \\. \\. \�-\ / )�� / .- / J I/ �/ PRIOR TO SOIL PREPARATION. PROTECTALL l / / / fir: �4� t \ \ -\\ \ / // / �- � /� l r`1 / i TREFSANDSHRUBSINDICATEDTOREMAIN. ( `\ II /// / / y' / / / / / - _ • \. \\. \ \ // / / '-/ J / / COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER'S < I. i / / / / / wY #vilel' /.7/!r \, \\ \.\\ / /r / I / J / /� ,// REPRESENTATIVE. I (� / / / / / / / / •,I •\ \. / WETLAND CI 1 / /•/ J ,►' 3. CLEAN PLANTING AREAS OF ALL CONSTRUCTION / / (0/ / / / - \ `f/- - r / / -� / / ( • MATERIALS,INCLUDING IMPORTED ROCK,TO THE \ isk / / / „, // /q, / ,;• ��a,. _ _ \ .,./>,-i ( ) 7 " SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER'S E REPRESENTATIVE I / � / / / / /� / // (r/ / • `./ir 1 ` A\ / / �/// / J y /(/ -�� ' BEFORE BEGINNING LANDSCAPE WORK \, /I /r/� / // c. // AIX-/ ,�/ //// c / I:cv j/% o ` 1�4., au- - - - � //irX,j--//i/�/" Jam/ / I l / r / / / // / /T //l / - /-I- v*- �t� /�1j// / / /I � J �/ pI DATE DLY 3L 2033 / / / / / / / / // J /.V J /� ) / ` t ��• � �'!7� /// //j r/ / lit/ ) / / / / /' i / �.�, \ /J // J/ i ^ / PROJECT NO. ss® / f / / // �� / - -3a s / // r/ % / / /\ f / / J / / /ti♦ / l //�'- \ l 'v- - \ �.��►�.. _ / . .�i /":„.-- / -- / J I DRAWN: LU �J1 I I / t / / // / // / ///( / \ \\\\ 'bi4 / /,.-..-:-___ // // J �/ / /�� / 1 f CHECKED. w I I 'I 1 t 1 /� / / /j / l / \. \ \ .n / / / ^ REVISIONS. • 1 ( / 1 / ) / , I /7 / r / _i I/ — / ` (/ '•\\\\\,., s .7 r — �-•� " \ i // / 1 / \ �' /l ti - 1, Q:�\\ \\. ''' - �':AtIva l'��` �� / l /�.—' / (�f�/1 _ ___,T�r -i (�) x \.\\ N'i, i�.� , _L0°- DESIGN //r �// (/ // (- /- - r - - - MATCHLINE-SEESHEETL71 1v,0��r - - //�?`6 l ' 4 , (" ' /' \� , l/ 1 -�\ DEVELOPMENT / ' ( ( - / .// /</ /, (y ////(, .I\��z\.\\\'\� -i-/� /, bb�• //��(�� W SHEET NUMBER 0 llrf�I L7.2 PLANTING LEGEND — - - — PROPERTY LINE 1 i a $ _ _ _ _ PHS DELINEATED u G VEGETATED CORRIDOR a 81 1 • ii PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED 1-p VEGETATED CORRIDOR 1 11 tr . , ` j / / / ` ( f I �. f / )rt/NI / I PHS DELINEATED WETLAND y € / .i• ) I / J)(I ) ( t ( \ v \ J .J ' / I/ (J1)r ' �_ J ° l \— \ t\ / < I / //`(/< ( ' PBS DELINEATED WETLAND \ �� I ' ` I((r \ �� \\ /( —\� ./ \chi)/� // V)11 ' �J _J — �l\,0 � ��/' / . I \ -� �-� \ KJ�lIgl I (/�f �r I/j�� \ \ Ir \ \ ` \ ,.� \ I I'' �) �`\ �' /�J /, PROPOSED TREE PLANTINGS I— .,- ( \ > i \\�\� \ A \ 0 // \ > ( �^` MILLI( \1\1 (J /11 )I\ z o \ N l f . \ ( // 1 / h JI I / i ' /// ei��i,`�i.O� PLANTING AREA Lij .2 -� / \\ , I " // ///J ( 1 }I/( :i e°i`i.�1.73 c f9 \ � �- r — N. I l 1/ ) N- )JJ / t \ I C,` j BIOSWALE PLANTING > cu ir_ ...\ \ t / �i~ ` =`.... C �, \ \ ( I 11( \ 1)r ( I I \, I 1 \ \� \ \ `, VEENGETATED CORNT&MITIGATION z Ci_ al / CC c ` \ 1 M 1 ` \` — ` _._ ) / I I / / /, I t ( ( // o \\\� PLANTING AREA Q \� ({ \ / \ I f --/ (> \ jr / Itt ? \ / ( /� \_� ROUGH LAWN a �> ///1 '+- W ( t \ / \ \ )\\`(// \ \ ( > > I I ,� ., z Q `� r � <�� \ ! LAWN REPAIR ,� 1 -' 1!. d ` < / / .� 0 / �_ 1</)I/ r / I \ Iv�v� /��i% z � V) o \'fit ................ / > \ �? ( \ ( /t _ _ ` --)-1----' r , \/'I (1f 7,f1' KEY NOTES < Q = >. \ �� ^ r I/ r ( I / G \ L ( / `(l(, ) \\I~ \1\ ( } _I / / S/I 0 NO TREE PLANTINGS WITHIN 6'OF TRAIL, �- l..) \. f ) { I c \ I ` ( / BRIDGE,OR PROPERTY LINES. PLANT ONLY 1 v� ) '� / �1 \ I ♦ ` ) \ \ 1 \ ` \ L / LOW SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS. • / I < E%ISTING BASEBALL FlEI(D,) \ ( / / Ain 1 > \ \ \ \ ( / /' _ 11r \ f c 1 ` l / ( \ \ ' J J \ ) I )C ( l )\ / ( \Iii / 7 �� '��( =1. ; LI J V \1 \ 01 ( ( ) ) I I t / ) I ( �(((� I PLANTING NOTES: \ 3 \ ^ l '' \ \ ( / J 1 / l 1 ( / / r 1- •\\1 (' 1. REFER TO SHEET LB.3 SITE DETAILS FOR PLANT \ \� i I ` V. 1/ j } t I // \ \ ` ( J J� I SCHEDULE. ter/ I _ _ r/I) v \ / / } 1 / ) \ I (' \ 1 I vv r /' j Jr % �( L. 1 \ 2. VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ( / , //) J �x J /) / / / ' / J /( ) ` I l ( ' l ) ` \_ `� l J J/( //J \ PRIOR TO SOIL PREPARATION. PROTECT All ,=Sauki/ I, TREES AND SHRUBS INDICATED TO REMAIN. / >! ` / J I ' �Ii O \ COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER'S \ } \ • \ / / ) ( '� ) 1 /I / / ( ( ( / \ �:�\ I REPRESENTATIVE. ( // / / 1 I ` ( } ( :NIPF•\ _ �° + I \ 3. CLEAN PLANTING AREAS OF ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS,INCLUDING IMPORTED ROCK,TO THE ° �, ) ( ) ) / f I / / \ \\ a -j_ 1\ =, SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE / ( I �>� BEFORE BEGINNING LANDSCAPE WORK. l y) )( r J / 1 \. 1 1 �) ( / f 1 t ) ( r ( l J I ( �� / A �,'.;, 1 I /' DATE: JOLT 31,2011 N.//) r /JJl `' J I ( f �� / (/ � / / �� ) ) 1 ( Il/�� // I' �.i PROW ND: 1109 </ `, ;1 ' i / �l ' / / / l ( ( /� ! ,\. \IN \. ..- \ III(^ 1 DRAWN: re �/ _�) / / ' ) / / o\ t ( ) (` . - . A .L''-0` � iil/ 1 1 CHECKED: LH ` I`\ 1 ) / / / J/ / ( 1.\' \ @\�\�\ �''" `'I / ( 11 ' \� REVSONS: \ ` �( \ (/ f ‘ — -, -.. \ \. \ \ ( ) J / ( / �` \� �� \.m i. III \ I / _ v A v I v� /" ` % l ` ` \ \ �� \ ~\ \ \\ C\ > I // IJ / / l' f \ \ ‘,-. �;�. � ., ,,1 , (� '� \'i%�- j ( 1 ,1 \� \ \ 1 / ) �� / J \ \ \� '•� �N. a / 1/ \ DESIGN / \ ( 1 ) T NE SEE HE 7.2 mil" r\ • \ ' '\ \*�i ` \ \\ I / / v �} I 'I i \ 1 i 1) ./ ,/ / ; ,,.\ .•\\ �. .,\ ., �. -s. ._ N1 . . ,\\ , \ DEVELOPMENT • / / _ I ! ! ,. I 7` SHEET NIIMBFF 0 107....7-1 L7.3 NOTE: 7"MATCH INSTALL THICKENED CONCRETE PAVING WIDTH VARIES-SEE PLAN EXIST. THICKENED EDGE ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS,ALL 0 CONCRETE ?; CONCRETE EDGE PLANTING AREAS,SEA1WALLS,AND CURBS. PAVING # DURAEDGE STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGING �� _— REMOVED CURB % "TOOLED RADIUS SCORE JOINT 4 EXPANSION JOINT CONCRETE PAVING (1/4"THICK,5"WIDE,BY 16'LENGTH, 1 °d a AT EDGES WITH 7 STAKES)-INSTALL FLUSH I 3/4"RADIUS ., 't • ' WITH FINISH GRADE \ lir FLUSH CONCRETE CURB I .......... a ® I u I W IC I REPLACED CONCRETE 9 1 I (J�' I • 1 11'i I i 4 r a t I — _ 1/4"MINUS 1111 PAVING IN PARKING =II1-I1.-6.•1I I`Ir11 a L1`r1.111I11�1:� 1.111. •_ 1_ = _1( -1 CRUSHED BASALT LOT(MATCH EXISTING) BASE 9 111-I I V-1 1'e•e e'-W 1 I I-1 11�I I H I! I I-III-1 11=1 I IIII COMPACTED -1 11 I I-11 I-I I I-I I I-III-I 11 I I-I ' _ _ _ _ _ GEOTEXTILE FABRIC i COMPACTED AGGREGATE III-III III I FI I L-I I�-III-III I III-III III I III=1 I-I AGGREGATE BASE "\ COMPACTED SUBGRADE I111 1-III„ IJI-111ILIII-III III-III 1L111-II-III-II III=111-I: COMPACTED COMPACTED War4r 11SIE_'n=uL11 4" 12" SUBGRADE SUBGRADE 9" 1' jr, O CONCRETE PAVING GRAVEL PAVING CROSS SECTION AA' SCALE:1'=1'-0' SCALE:11/2"=1'-0" SCALE:1 1/2'=1'-0' V) .r 8 6' 1, z C W O ADA ACCESS AISLE C EXISTING CURB G NOTE INSTALL MASON SAND ON TOP OF REMAIN W ro VERTICAL ELEMENT SEALANT BEFORE SEALANT CURES(TYP.). ', ELASTOM1E�RIC JOINT SEALANT (LE.CURB,WALL,BLDG.) °- - O CC (DEPTH='fi JOINT WIDTH) ELAS70MERIC JOINT SEALANT TOOLED SCORE D °" w - s° CURB TAPER :DEPTH=1f2 JOINT WIDTH) JOINia> > �.. �'✓"TOOLED RADIUS-NO SHINER ��" / "TOOLED RADIUS-NOFLUSH Cl1RB BANDS -ED RAAT JOINTS) a"[ TOOLEDRADIUSNOSHINER- /// ;HINER BANDS(Tl'P. P •>., ANDS TJOINTS) >D N ° r > CONCRETE PAD J ro w. P u ° (BEGINNING Of TRAIL) — ][ "' N. " -CENTER WITHIN Q CL -2 PREFORMED E.J.MATERIAL CONCRETE PAVING ° , > " ° PARKING SPACE �( ro <' P D PREFORMED E.J.MATERIAL D ° W O. LJJ 0 I) w #k #k " " P�N1�IE W" U..1U = o T %" E.J.IN PAVING %" EJ.IN VERTICAL ELEMENTS �B"SCORE JOINT IN PAVING CURB TAPER N Q I • EXISTING CURB /^,� \I PAVING CONTROL JOINTS I / /1 TO REMAIN ` T / SCALE:3"=1'-0" �� I TINISH GRADE ELEVATION SCALE:1/2"=1'-0' ASPHALT TRAIL PAVING ASPHALT PAVING NEAR WITH GRAVEL SHOULDER BIOSWALE(SEE PLAN) FLUSH CURB SHOULDER: (SEE PLAN) SP`.AI F:AS SHOWN COMPACT TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION \ . . ..,. "////�� .,.91 444E LEVEL II CLASS '^ ^`_LI I ile Ij ;//// �� p// ////_//�_. lr I ASPHALTIC CONCRETE \ =1.1 1.101. -1LIi.1.41001 Viie: 1.1 1.I.I.0011. '�1'}1 I. • • . :�.- a • •. s` •`r a ;4T •._ �•'• • • •'mi *, TOPSOIL • 1.1 101.1. �1 1. `L1�.1.1 1 1 I / 0A76 1 4N 11.1.1a�:� . 1.`'iIi._11.>. 4, _I'7!.1 1a1 1. .1 1.d COMPACTED AGGREGATE \ 11 I I I=1 I I� =1 =i i I I I= =1 =1 I I=1 =1 I�I I=1 1=1 , BASE 12" X 4 � DATE: JULY 31,2012 ©ASPHALT PAVING PRIMER NO: 1109 SCALE:1 12"=1.-0' DRAWN: TB CHECKED: LH REVISIONS: DESIGN • DEVELOPMENT SHEE NL,ME:3 L8.1 11 1111.11111411 �/ 24"(TYP.) 29 5i, • _ C i i i �l CITY OF TIGARD < ' �� STANDARD BENCH a • // '• ��,��i�i (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) g 5 F a n ,S N4—_ I CONCRETE PAVING WITH ' S, THICKENEDSIABON ' c 27„ CITY OF TIGARD •o` • J JtFIJWAI. PLANTER SIDE r ,i STANDARD BIKE RACK I tO JACK PARK (SEE SPECIFICATIONS) I I - • sr I "I • STEEL FRAME AND POSTS ,`, o •; - IE=11H1 � ' 4 ;.I III 1 I _ COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE �� ,��CONCRETE PAVING F� in SIGN e` _ i'' CONCRETE FOOTING CITY STANDARD v 1 COMPACTED - l • AGGREGATE BASE 'a BRICK SUPPORT AS REQUIRED H CITY LOGO IEIIKI l_ II FF-II II I�FIT I IffI IIFII II - >, _ �I1I -I-I 11I IIE�IF IF I.ip, COMPACTED I11F�1�-7 1 = II II I �Ikk��11.. SUBGRADE 12" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CROSS SECTION B-B' COMPACTEDSUBGRADE G C Tp • SCALE:1"=ro" C3)BENCHWc 22 0 ENTRY SIGNSCALE 1"=1'-0'1oCC m ro FILTER FABRIC YATERYL i () (.1) L 36'WIDE ROLLS — M mi d ' • • 3 MINYDY ` Q CC IRON TOE aF SLOPE USE aiiiwul LOOPS to Q l—I as '. OVER 2"6 2"POSTS P. ^ W L� Fi ' 0 0 Li •' it .j ').v-f% ).*1 ?%e LU 15 N S . 6'WfIYW SPACING (/) 1 a. o FRONT VIEW PReFII F • 1 24" I36" 136" I24" NIB NEC I 10' FE NOTES: ANGLE FILTER FABRIC 1. BURY BOTIOY OF FILTER FABRIC 6" PLAN VIEW FENCE TO ASSURE SOIL IS TRAPPED VERTICALLY BELOW FINISHED GRADE SCALE:1/2"=1'-0" 2. 25"2"FIR.PINE CR STEEL I ::/ FENCE POTS. BIKE RACK \ A. FTLTFR FAPACT BRIC TREICH.OF SCAT F:AS SHOWN 5. PANELS MUST BE PLACED ACCORDING TO LOCATION SHOWN ON EROSION CONTROL PINT INTERLOCKED POSTS AND ATTAR PLAN VIEW NIS 1 (4)SscALE:ILT FENCINGnrTs DATE: JULY 91,2012 PROJECT NO: 1109 DRAWN: TB CHECKED! LH REVISIONS: • DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SHEET NUMBER L8.2 NOTES: V yyyy 1. INSTALL COIR MATTING(SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS FOR NOTES: LOCATIONS)PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION. NOTES: u 1. KEEP HERBACEOUS PLUGS MOIST AND IN THEIR CONTAINERS CUT COIR MATTING AT CONTAINER LOCATION,FOLD AND 1. STAKE TREES 1.5"CALIPER OR LARGER. s 1 UNTIL INSTALLATION. SECURE COIR BACK WHILE PLANTING SO AS TO NOT DAMAGE 2. SET STAKES VERTICAL AND AT SAME HEIGHT. 6. 2. WHEN INSTALLING HERBACEOUS PLUGS OVER LARGE AREAS, INTEGRITY OF COIR. AFTER PLANTING,FOLD COIR BACK IN o 4 • BEGIN WORK NEAR CREEK AND WORKOUT TO HIGHER ) PLACE AND ANCHOR. `I/ t TJ B ELEVATIONS. TAKE CARE TO NOT OVERCOMPACT SOILS. '" 3. MAKE HERBACEOUS PLUG PLANTING HOLE WITH DIBBLE OR Bg METAL BAR OF A DIAMETER SLIGHTLY LARGER THAN ROOT t _ / WOOD STAKE(REMOVE i I MASS. INSTALL HERBACEOUS PLUG IN PREPARED SOIL. CUT AND REMOVE ALL BINDINGS/ STAKE AND TIES 1 FULL B 4, TAMP SOIL/COIR LIGHTLY AROUND PLUG PRIOR TO STAPLING. CONTAINER FROM ROOTBALL PRIOR TO YEAR AFTER PLANTINGS) 9' 5. STAPLE OR PIN COIR MATTING PER MANUFACTURERS ��\� BACKFILLING RECOMMENDATION. �\\ ,��- \v TREE TIES HERBACEOUS PLUG BARK MULCH-3"DEPTH COIR MATTING T-; COIR MATTING-CROSS CUT IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRIIIRL..- ,IIIIIIIIIIIIIQIIIIIIP�I REMOVE BURLAP/ if 1f 1' II 71 If PREPARED BACKFILL,AS SPECIFIED TO ALLOW FOR PLANTING II II II IL, ( BINDINGS FROM ROOT BALL n n I R II BARK/MULCH 11 I- 11 P _ 12"MIN. I-I 1 Wit Mn u I I= SCARIFY TO 4"DEPTH AND RECOMPACT - =II� IT"11= R�'ll�'] MOUND TO FORM SAUCER ilI ¶-: �i=n III= 1 11— 11- 2"-3"DEPTH LOOSENED 5� :'\ _I �nRIIIIl111I�It Illlllllllllluuum.._.: nR111 A11111I1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIiIII nii�.. — SURFACE SOIL _ —III- �' II"II P11= °-" \� I'III'1f 1'l!— I- -iTr -"' l f11RTT� �\`v R— —III=I 11I lIl111-lIl III- fiat `\\\ ` 1iR- I TOPSOIL COMPOST MIX Z O �, �. _I I—III—I 1 I—III—I I I I I I R II \\\� J� BACK FILL -_ ON CENTER SPACING VARIES 1 1 I 11- 11-11 _I—II=. I: I I—I� Sw +-, -SEE PLANT SCHEDULE MINIMUM DIAMETER III— rl"JL'J 4R b '—III— G N OF PLANT PR 12" HERBACEOUS PLUG PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING -I II °Tr"n. R"R IT-1— II 11. 11- II II y —I I I NATIVE SOIL W U I Ale -II= II i1JL1 N 1 SCALE: = -0' SCALE: =1'-0 I— LI_ry _I_ 0 —1 I i' - AND R RECOMPACT DEPTHIFY TO 4" 73 CC 1—I11—I I1-1II—II1=11I'I1I =I I a cc o -III] -II I-III-III-III- r- STAKES TO EXTEND 6• 5 'n k BELOW TREE PIT INTO (n ` s- UNDISTURBED GROUND —I O 41) CONIFER TREE PLANTING Qce H Qrl T0.0 O 1 SCALE:,'=1'-0' LJJ CL w NOTES: PLANT SCHEDULE: l! I U Q ? I 1. STAKE TREES 1.5"CALIPER OR LARGER. I— Q = a.+ • 1� 2. SET STAKES VERTICAL AND AT SAME HEIGHT. a U �� SYMBOL: BOTANICAL NAME: COMMON NAME: 512E/CONDTTION SPACING: V1 lTREES: I FR FRAXINUS OXICARPA'RAYWOOD' RAYWOOD ASH 2'CAL CONTAINER AS SHOWN RH RHAMNUS PURSHIANA CASCARA 4'-5'HGT/CONTAINER AS SHOWN TH THUJA PLICATA'FASTIGGIATA' HOGAN CEDAR 4'-6'HGT/CONTAINER AS SHOWN \ % SHRUBS: ��ted COTON'S THUNBERGII EAST R DAMMERRIMSON PYGMY' BBEARBERRY OTONEASTER RIMSON PYGMY BARBERRY 1 GAL CONTAINER 3'0.0 1 GAL CONTAINER 3'O C _ �� Nr�' MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM'COMPACTA' COMPACT OREGON GRAPE 1 GAL CONTAINER 3'O.C. 'WIN. "� ,� ��►� SPIRAEA X BUMALDA'FROEBELII' FROEBELII SPIRAEA 2 GAL.CONTAINER 4'0.0 —� SPIRAEA JAPONICA'MAGIC CARPET MAGIC CARPET SPIRAEA 1 GAL CONTAINER 3'O.C. 1, TREE TIES p GROUNDCOVERS: .. T ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI KINNIKINNICK 1 GAL CONTAINER 3'0.0 'I / WOOD STAKE(REMOVE HEMEROCALLIS'STELLA O ORO' STELLA D'ORO DAYULLY I GAL CONTAINER 3'O.C. J/ STAKE AND TIES 1 FULL MAHONIA REPENS CREEPING OREGON GRAPE 1 GAL CONTAINER 3'O.0 YEAR AFTER PLANTINGS) TREE WRAP .. RESTORED LAWN MATCH EXISTING REMOBINDINVE GS FROM ROOTBALL ROUGH LAWN SEE SPECIFICATIONS 12"MIN. BIOSWALE PLANTINGS: BARK/MULCH i CAREXOBNUPTA SLOUGH SEDGE PLUG 2'O.0 DATE: JRELY31,1012 MOUND TO FORM SAUCER / CAREX STIPATA SAWBEAK SEDGE PLUG 2'0.C � uoR II CORN USSERICEA RED-OSIER DOGWOOD 1 GAL CONTAINER 6'O.0 „AIMMIII1IIIIIIIIIII IIIII,,". /...,,",„,,fionum imIIIIII I1'1' / DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA TUFTED HAIRGRASS PLUG 2'0.C. DRAWN: TR -1I HI • n R -4-T".."— n— R- -u a I =u-' \� ��-1I ',LT-tr.iIII—_ JUNCUS PATENS SPREADING RUSH PLUG 2'O.0 u. II I ``Fill 111 :1 -III—III- TOPSOIL/COMPOST MIX MAHONIA AQUIFODUM'COMPACTA' COMPACT OREGON GRAPE I GAL CONTAINER 3'O.C. DECKED' LH 1 1j1_II n��II' -\lie\` ' '11=11 III— "— BACK FILL ROSA PISOCARPA CLUSTERED ROSE 1 GAL CONTAINER 5'O.C. REvmoxs: —IIIIiII n� i_ D n4' =I SCIRPUS MICROCARPUS SMALL-FRUITED BULRUSH PLUG 3'O.0 III—I 11=11 'II' 11 1Jii SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS SNOWBERRY 1 GAL CONTAINER 4'D.C. II IIII I ' :II-- '1= I— 11 11—P—1 IliL1_h NATIVE SOIL—II =1 %_ 1 R- I� VEGETATED CORRIDOR ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PLANTINGS: _ I W : II ACER MACROPHYLLUM BIGLEAF MAPLE 2 GAL.CONTAINER 10'O.C —I / /\�i f�• I I- I- ��11��_��_�� _ A DRRECOMPACT DEPTH ` � AMELANCHIER ALNIFOUA WESTERN SERVICEBERRY 2 GAL CONTAINER 6'D.C. III 11-II-II 11 =III-III-III-I I' -1 I� \ - MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM TALL OREGON GRAPE 1 GAL CONTAINER 4'0.C. DESIGN -III— I1 1 1=IIIIII1 1- I1 1STAKES TO EXTEND 6" PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS PACIFIC NINEBARK 1 GAL CONTAIN 6'OC 1 BELOW TREE PIT INTO POLYSTICHUMMUNITUM SWORDFERN 2GALCONTAINER 4'O.0 DEVELOPMENT UNDISTURBED GROUND PSEUDOTSUGA MENZEISII DOUG FIR 2 GAL CONTAINER 10'0.0 ROSA GYMNOCARPA BALDHIP ROSE 1 GAL CONTAINER 4'O.0 SHEET NUM BER CALIPERED DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING SYMPHORICARPOS ALBUS SNOWBERRY 1GAL CONTAINER 4'O.0 4 SCALE: L8.3 CL BEARING t 6' 6'IB' r r r r • TIMBER BRIDGE V A BY CONTRACTOR 61 9 B B1 1 I �A i w I I I . MIN. 1D'-0"WIDE (n Y Y FOOTING '�`cp a H r l z = a.W K /� W ° O y O �/J 5 (O oD o Z i to cc �! O j a+:o � CU H1 0 CC -a EL211 FT U C el I l=1 =L .=I. rear k II'�11:�1 11 I-7 '.ill W o_ co � cn 2 5-0' ! 4'-0' J — ra Cl_ Z TU < Cr ° TOP OF NATIVE/UNDISRBED W MATERIAL W < a 2 p aw ~ (.I NORTH ABUTMENT H 0 U Q ° • Q Q —, aD a BEARINGfag gle'6•r r Consulting Engineers ¢ TIMBER BRIDGE BY I S115W501 Avenue Suite 2500 CONTRACTOR _-- I Portland,Oregon 97204 503-227-3251 i 10'4'WIDE FOOTING -/[ 6"MIN. o v .w TVP- 1-o 20 �U W DAM SM 31,2012 OKto PROg•:if MO•. 1309 .-U \ °•e`eao: . - } o`oo` _.'' i : a CHEMED: SF e ' EL 2z5 FT 7f51f�=ll'- '=C=7-If -if; REVISIONS. TOP OF NATIVE/UNDISTURBED MATERIAL DESIGN • DEVELOPMENT SHEET NUMBER SOUTH ABUTMENT S 1 1 SCALE:,/2'=i'-0• ,CI CITY OF TIGARD NI • PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES - (Pre-Application Meeting Notes are Valid for Six(6)Months) PRE-APP.MTG.DATE: April 3,2012 STAFF AT PRE-APP.: John Floyd,Gus Duenas, Mike White,Albert Shields NON-RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT: Steve Martin.City of Tigard AGENT: Steve Duh Phone: (503)718-2583 Phone: (503) 989-9345 PROPERTY LOCATION: ADDRESS/GENERAL LOCATION: 12420 SW 127th Ave(jack Park) TAX MAPS)/LOT#(5): 2S104AA.Lot 04600&2S104AD.Lot 04501 NECESSARY APPLICATIONS: Minor Modification of Existing Conditional Use (Jack Park): Minor Modification to an Approved Conditional Use (TVF&R Walnut Station); Sensitive Lands Review (Type II) for work within the wetland buffer; PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: The project would modify an existing conditional use (Jack Pack) through the • construction of a small tot-lot playground. a community garden. an ADA- accessible trail and bridge to connect the TVF&R fire station parking lot and existing trails at jack Park; and restoration and enhancement of the existing riparian area along Krueger Creek. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential:Open Space ZONING MAP DESIGNATION: R-4.5 Low Density Residential District ZONING DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Sections 18.330&18.510) Setbacks: All building setbacks are a minimum of 30 feet from any property line. Maximum Building Height: 30 Feet - projections not used for human habitation (such as a bridge) are exempt from this limit) 1 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (Refer to the Neighborhood Meeting Handout) THE APPLICANT SHALT NOTIFY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 PEET, INTERESTED PARTIES,AND THE CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION of their proposal. A minimum of two (2) weeks between the mailing date and the meeting date is required. Please review the Land Use Notification handout concerning site posting and the meeting notice. Meeting is to be held prior to submitting your application . or the application will not be accepted CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page l of 7 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section �1 NARRATIVE (Refer to Code Chapter 18390) The APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A NARRATIVE which provides findings based on the applicable approval standards. A list of applicable code sections is contained on page 4 of below. Failure to provide a narrative or • adequately address criteria would be reason to consider an application incomplete and delay review of the proposal. The applicant should review the code for applicable criteria. 11 IMPACT STUDY (Refer to Code Sections 18390.040 and 18.390.050) As a part of the APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, applicants are required to INCLUDE IMPACT STUDY with their submittal package. The impact study shall quantify the effect of the development on public facilities and services. The study shall address, at a minimum, the transportation system,including bikeways, the drainage system,the parks system,the water system,the sewer system and the noise impacts of the development. For each public facility system and type of impact, the study shall propose improvements necessary to meet City standards, and to minimize the impact of the development on the public at large, public facilities systems, and affected private property users. In situations where the Community Development Code requires the dedication of real property interests, the applicant shall either specifically concur with the dedication requirement, or provide evidence which supports the conclusion that the real property dedication requirement is not roughly proportional to the projected impacts of the development. ❑ ACCESS (Refer to Chapters 18.705 and 18.765) ❑ WALKWAY REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.705.030) WALKWAYS SHALL EXTEND FROM THE GROUND FLOOR ENTRANCES OR FROM THE GROUND FLOOR LANDING OF STAIRS, ramps, or elevators of all commercial,institutional, and industrial uses, to the streets which provide the required access and egress. Walkways shall provide convenient connections between buildings in multi-building commercial, institutional, and industrial complexes. Unless impractical, walkways should be constructed between a new development and neighboring developments. n BUFFERING AND SCREENING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.745) • In order TO INCREASE PRIVACY AND TO EITHER REDUCE OR ELIMINATE ADVERSE NOISE OR VISUAL IMPACTS between adjacent developments, especially between different land uses, the City requires landscaped buffer areas along certain site perimeters. Required buffer areas are described by the Code in terms of width. Buffer areas must be occupied by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and must also achieve a balance between vertical and horizontal plantings. Site obscuring screens or fences may also be required; these are often advisable even if not required by the Code. The required buffer areas may only be occupied by vegetation, fences,utilities, and walkways. Additional information on required buffer area materials and sizes may be found in the Development Code. ® LANDSCAPING (Refer to Code Chapters 18.705 18.745,and 18.765) STREET TREES ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS FRONTING ON A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET as well as driveways which are more than 100 feet in length. Street trees must be placed either within the public right-of-way or on private property within six (6) feet of the right-of-way boundary. Street trees must have a minimum caliper of at least two (2) inches when measured four (4) feet above grade. Street trees should be spaced 20 to 40 feet apart depending on the branching width of the proposed tree species at maturity. Further information on regulations affecting street trees may be obtained from the Planning Division. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY SEVEN (7) PARKING SPACES MUST BE PLANTED in and around all parking areas in order to provide a vegetative canopy effect Landscaped parking areas shall include Mow special design features which effectively screen the parking lot areas from view. V"- if/ These design features may include the use of landscaped berms,decorative walls,and raised planters. RECYCLING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.755) Applicant should CONTACT FRANCHISE HAULER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SITE SERVICING COMPATIBILITY. Locating a trash/recycling enclosure within a dear vision area such as at the intersection of two (2) driveways within a parking lot is prohibited. Much of Tigard is within Pride Disposal's • Service area. Pride Disposal can be reached at(503) 625-6177. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 7 NON-Resid. tial Applieatum/Planning.Division Section ® PARKING (Refer to Code Chapter 18.765) J TOTAL REQUIRED parking(Fire Station): 31 vehicle spaces and 6 ib cycle spaces • NO MORE THAN 50%OF REQUIRED SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED AND/OR DIMENSIONED AS COMPACT SPACES. HANDICAPPED PARKING: ► All parking areas shall PROVIDE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND DIMENSIONED DISABLED PERSON PARKING spaces. The minimum number of disabled person parking spaces to be provided, as well as the parking stall dimensions,is mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). A handout is available upon request. A handicapped parking space symbol shall be painted on the parking space surface and an appropriate sign shall be posted. ® CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) STANDARDS (Refer to CWS R&O 07-20/USA Regulations-Chapter 3) CWS Service Provider Letter: PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL of any land use applications,the applicant must obtain a CWS Service Provider Letter which will outline the conditions necessary to comply with the CWS R&O 07-20 sensitive area requirements. If there are no sensitive areas,CWS must still issue a letter stating a CWS Service Provider Letter is not required. ® STEEP SLOPES (Refer to Code Section 18.775.080.C) When STEEP SLOPES exist, prior to issuance of a final order, a geotechnical report must be submitted which addresses the approval standards of the Tigard Community Development Code Section 18.775.080.C. The report shall be based upon field exploration and investigation and shall include specific recommendations for achieving the requirements of Section 18.775.080.C. ❑ SIGNS (Refer to Code Chapter 18.780) SIGN PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY SIGN in the City of Tigard. A "Guidelines for Sign Permits" handout is available upon request. Additional sign area or height beyond Code • standards may be permitted if the sign proposal is reviewed as part of a development review application. Alternatively,a Sign Code Exception application may be filed for Director's review. ❑ TREE REMOVAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Refer to Code Section 18.790.030.0 and the "Tree Plan Requirements Handout" included in your pre-application conference packet) A TREE PLAN FOR THE PLANTING,REMOVAL AND PROTEUI ION OF TREES prepared by a certified arborist shall be provided for any lot,parcel or combination of lots or parcels for which a development application for a subdivision, partition, site development review, planned development, or conditional use is filed. PROTECTION IS PREFERRED OVER REMOVAL WHEREVER POSSIBLE (Address all items in the City's Tree Plan Requirements Handout). TREES REMOVED WITHIN THE PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR PRIOR TO A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION LISTED ABOVE will be inventoried as part of the tree plan above and will be replaced according to Section 18.790.060.D. ® CLEAR VISION AREA (Refer to Code Chapter 18.795) The City requires that CLEAR VISION AREAS BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THREE(3)AND EIGHT(8) FEET IN HEIGHT at road/driveway,road/railroad, and road/road intersections. The size of the required clear vision area depends upon the abutting street's functional classification and any existing obstructions within the clear vision area. • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 3 of 7 NON-Re.idential Application/Planning Division Seciton APPLICABLE CODE CHAPTERS ® 18.330(Conditional Use) ❑ 18.620(Tigard Triangle Design Standards) ❑ 18.760(Nonconforming Situations) 18.340(D reu n s Imerprcra itm) ❑ 18.630(Washington Square Regional Center) ® 18.765 (Off-Street Pa i mg/1 r ding • Requirements) ❑ 18.350(mimed Development) ❑ 18.640(Durham Quarry DesignStandards)S ) ® 18.775(Sensitive lends Review) ® 18.360(Site Development Re-tick) ® 18.705(.lccess/Egress/Circulation) ❑ 18.780(Signs) ❑ 18.370(Variances/Adjustments) ❑ 18.710(AccesoT):Residential Units) ❑ 18.785(Mammary Use Permits) ❑ 18.380(Zoning Map/Text Amendments) ❑ 18.715(Density Computations) 0 18.790(Tree Removal) ❑ 18.385(.Miscellaneous Perrrrits) ❑ 18.720(Design Compatibility Standards) ® 18.795(Visual Clearance Areas) ® 18.390(Decision Making Procedures/impact ® 18.725(Environmental Performance 0 18.798(Wireless Communication Facilities) Study) Standards) n 18.410(Lot line Adjustments) ❑ 18.730(Exceptions To Development ® 18.810 (Street & Utility Improvement Standards) Standards) ❑ 18.420(.and Partitions) ❑ 18.740(listosic overlay) ❑ 18.430(Subdivisions) ❑ 18.742(Home Occupation Permit) ® 18.510(Residential Zoning Districts) ® 18.745(landscaping&Screening Standards) ❑ 18.520(Commercial Zoning Distrrcts) ❑ 18.750 (Manufactured/Mobil (Horne Regulations) ❑ 18.530(Industrial Zoning Districts) ❑ 18.755 (Mixed Solid Waste/Recycling Storage) • • CITY OF TIGARD Pre_Application Conference Notes Page 4 of 7 NUN-Kesalential Application/Planning Division Section ADDITIONAL CONCERNS OR COMMENTS: • 1. Seven questions were submitted with your application. These are listed below,with a staff response to each: If grading within the Sensitive Lands can be held at or below the 50 yard threshold,will this project move forward as a Type I review? How does interpretation from CWS affect the classification of the land use review process for the project? How is "ground disturbance" defined within the context of the sensitive lands chapter? Work within the vegetated corridor surrounding the wetland areas will be subject to a Type II sensitive lands review, consistent with the administrative application of the 18.775 in the CUP2007-00003 (TVF&R Walnut Station) as approved by the Hearings Officer. CWS must approve this work prior to application submittal in a Service Provider Letter. The term "ground disturbance" is not a defined term in the Tigard Development Code. Nor was the term defined within the Comprehensive Plan or CWS Design and Construction Standards (so far as Tigard staff would determine). A plain reading of the term would indicate activities of a similar nature but lesser scale than landform alteration,and temporary by nature. In an effort to provide an ADA-accessible connection from the proposed park addition to the community room,the removal of at least one parking stall may be proposed. Please confirm that the removal of a stall or two will not trigger a replacement of parking,since no parking is required for this use as per the Development Code. The parking lot was approved under CUP2007-00003 with an approved parking range of between 31 (minimum) and 45 (maximum) parking spaces,with 39 included on the approved plans. Changes within this range can be approved through a Minor Modification. • What level of detail is needed regarding the engineered bridge and abutments for the planning review? At a minimum, please include all information specified in the "Land Use Application Detailed Submittal Checklist" contained within the pre-application packet. This would include a site plan, grading plan, and elevations. Construction level detail is not necessary. Bicycle parking will likely be installed within the park addition, and they already exist with the development portion of the neighborhood park. Please clarify the code requirements for additional bicycle storage,if any,given the proposed improvements. Bicycle parking standards are set forth in 18.765.050 of the Tigard Development Code. Are there any other land use entitlements that would be required. In addition to Sensitive Lands Review for work within the vegetated corridor(see above),the folleowing is will be required: Gtle > Minor Modification to an Existing Conditional Use(Jack Park) bf Q`t � ➢ Minor Modification to an Approved Conditional Use(TVF&R Walnut Station); _R �' c0114 ➢ Additional Sensitive Lands Permits for steep slopes and Tree Removal Permits may be required (see comment number 2 below). Would a pedestrian pathway connection he required form the side valk to the park addition, other than the parking lot access? • This is not required,but connectivity is encouraged. Section 18.705.030 addresses pedestrian connections with buildings. Park uses are not addressed. CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 5 of 7 N<)N-Reidential Applicaturn/Plannmg Division Section If the project is deemed a Type I review, can the cost of the pre-app conference be credited against subsequent application costs? No,pre-application conferences are not creditable to future permits. 2. Your project is within an area that contains four types of sensitive land areas: steep slopes (25% or greater), • wetlands,drainageways,and habitat area. a. Exempted activities: Work related to the removal of the culvert and restoration of the area can be exempted from City of Tigard requirements for areas containing steep slopes,wetland, and drainageways. This exemption requires demonstration that this work is related to a stream and wetlands restoration and enhancement program,and not an isolated project. b. Park & Trail Improvements: Work within sensitive lands area related to the trail, bridge, and other park improvements will be subject to the provisions of the Sensitive Lands Chapter. c. Tree Removal: Any tree removal within the sensitive lands area will require a tree removal permit. Within stream and wetland corridors (50' from the boundary edge),tree removal must maintain no less than a 75% canopy cover or no less than existing canopy cover if the existing canopy cover is less than 75%. 3. Four trees within the vicinity of your project are protected from removal by a deed restriction. They may only be removed by the Hearings Officer under a reconsideration of CUP2007-00003 (TVF&R Walnut Station), or a determination that they are dead or hazardous by a certified arborist. Please see CUP2007-00003 for more detail. 4. Please note that amendments to Urban Forestry standards are presently being considered by the Planning Commission. As such application requirements and approval standards are subject to change in coming months. 5. See also Pre-Application Conference Notes from the Engineering Section, and Transportation Development Tax estimates. PROCEDURE X Administrative Staff Review(Type II). • Public hearing before the Land Use Hearings Officer Public hearing before the Planning Commission Public hearing before the Planning Commission with the Commission making a recommendation on the proposal to the City Council. An additional public hearing shall be held by the City Council. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL PROCESS All APPLICATIONS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY A PLANNING DIVISION STAFF MEMBER of the Community Development Department at Tigard City Hall offices. PLEASE NOTE: Applications submitted by mail or dropped off at the counter without Planning Division acceptance may be returned_ The Planning counter closes at 5;00 PM. Maps submitted with an application shall be folded IN ADVANCE to 81"x 11". One,81/2"x 11" map of a proposed project shall be submitted for attachment to the staff report or administrative decision, Applications with unfolded maps shall not be accepted. The Planning Division and Engineering Department will perform a preliminary review of the application and will determine whether an application is complete within 30 days of the counter submittal. Staff will notify the applicant if additional information or additional copies of the submitted materials are required. The administrative decision or public hearing will typically occur approximately 45 to 60 days after an application is accepted as being complete by the Planning Division. Applications involving difficult or protracted issues or requiting review by other jurisdictions may take additional time to review. Written recommendations from the Planning staff are issued seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. A 10-day public appeal period follows all land use decisions. An appeal on this matter would be heard by the Tigard Hearings Officer. • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 6 of 7 NON-Residential Application/Planning Division Section This PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE AND THE NOTES OF THE CONFERENCE ARE INTENDED TO INFORM the prospective applicant of the primary Community Development Code • requirements applicable to the potential development of a particular site and to allow the City staff and prospective applicant to discuss the opportunities and constraints affecting development of the site. BUILDING PERMITS PLANS FOR BUILDING AND OTHER RELATED PERMITS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNTIL A LAND USE APPROVAL HAS BEEN ISSUED. Final inspection approvals by the Building Division will not be granted until there is compliance with all conditions of development approval. These pre-application notes do not include comments from the Building Division. For proposed buildings or modifications to existing buildings, it is recommended to contact a Building Division Plans Examiner to determine if there are building code issues that would prevent the structure from being constructed, as proposed. Additionally, with regard to Subdivisions and Minor Land Partitions where any structure to be demolished has system development charge (SDC) credits and the underlying parcel for that structure will be eliminated when the new plat is recorded, the City's policy is to apply those system development credits to the first building permit issued in the development (UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE TIME IN WHICH THE DEMOLITION PERMIT IS OBTAINED). PLEASE NOTE: The conference and notes cannot cover all Code requirements and aspects related to site planning that should apply to the development of your site plan. Failure of the staff to provide information required by the Code shall not constitute a waiver of the applicable standards or requirements. It is recommended that a prospective applicant either obtain and read the Community Development Code or ask any questions of City staff relative to Code requirements prior to submitting an application. • AN ADDITIONAL PRE-APPLICATION FEE AND CONFERENCE WILL BE REQUIRED IF AN APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THIS PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE IS SUBMITTED AFTER A PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX (6) MONTHS FOLLOWING THIS CONFERENCE (unless deemed as unnecessary by the Planning Division). PREPARED BY: John Floyd_Associate Planner CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING DIVISION PHONE: 503-718-2429 FAX: 503-624-3681 EMAIL: johnfl@tigard-or.gov 1:\CURPLN\JobxF\Pre-Appc11ack Park\PRE2012-0OOO5.docx • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 7 of 7 NON-Residential ipplicanon/Planning Divui.m section PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE NOTES s • ➢ DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING < RmAatt. eft elTlgart Orono Community,Development Shapiz kt:srCommunity PUBLIC FACILITIES Tax Maptst: YS104M04501lack Park Tax lofts]: 4501 Uso TIa1C: R4.5 The extent of necessary public improvements and dedications which shall be required of the applicant will be recommended by City staff and subject to approval by the appropriate authority. There will be no final recommendation to the decision making authority on behalf of the City staff until all concerned commenting agencies, City staff and the public have had an opportunity to review and comment on the application. The following comments are a projection of public improvement related requirements that may be required as a condition of development approval for your proposed project. Right-of-way dedication: The City of Tigard requires that land area be dedicated to the public: (1.) To increase abutting public rights-of-way to the ultimate functional street classification right-of-way width as specified by the Community Development Code; or (2.) For the creation of new streets. • Approval of a development application for this site will require right-of-way dedication for: ® N/A ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet ❑ SW to feet Street improvements: ® N/A 18.730.040 Additional Setback Requirements: This section sets requirements for additional setback distance from roadways. The minimum yard requirement shall be increased in the event a yard abuts a street having a right-of-way width less than required by its functional classification on the city's transportation plan map and, in such case, the setback shall be not less than the setback required by the zone plus one-half of the projected road width as shown on the transportation map. N/A • CITY OF TIGARD Pre-AppNcation Conference Notes Pagel de Denetoealent Eegiaeetln! Agreement for Future Street Improvements: In some cases, where street improvements or other necessary public improvements are not currently practical, the improvements may be deferred. In such cases, a condition of development approval may • be specified which requires the property owner(s)to provide a future improvement guarantee. The City Engineer will determine the form of this guarantee. The following street improvements may be eligible for such a future improvement guarantee: (1.) N/A (2.) Overhead Utility Lines: ® Section 18.810.120 of the Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) requires all overhead utility lines adjacent to a development to be placed underground or, if approved by the City Engineer, a fee in-lieu of undergrounding can be paid. This requirement is valid even if the utility lines are on the opposite side of the street from the site. If the fee in-lieu is approved, it is equal to $ 35.00 per lineal foot of street frontage that contains the overhead lines. N/A Sanitary Sewers: Sanitary sewer service is provided by the City of Tigard. Sewer is available for the site. Water Supply: • The City of Tigard provides public water service in this area. Water service is available to the site. Fire Protection: Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue District [Contact: John Wolff, 503-259-1504) provides fire protection services within the City of Tigard. The District should be contacted for information regarding the adequacy of circulation systems, the need for fire hydrants, or other questions related to fire protection. Fire protection services are not necessary for the proposed project. Storm Sewer Improvements: All proposed development within the City shall be designed such that storm water runoff is conveyed to an approved public drainage system. The applicant will be required to submit a proposed storm drainage plan for the site, and may be required to prepare a sub-basin drainage analysis to ensure that the proposed system will accommodate runoff from upstream properties when fully developed. Storm water detention may be required. Storm water detention facilities, if required, must be reviewed and approved by the city. Storm water detention calculations shall be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval. • Storm Water Quality: The City has agreed to enforce Surface Water Management (SWM) regulations established by the Unified Sewerage Agency (USA) (Resolution and Order No. 00-7) which requires the construction of CITY OF TIGARD Pre-Application Conference Notes Page 2 of 4 Deeebpmeet Wineries on-site water quality facilities. The facilities shall be designed to remove 65 percent of the phosphorus contained in 100 percent of the storm water runoff generated from impervious surfaces. The resolution contains a provision that would allow an applicant to pay a fee in-lieu of constructing an on-site facility provided specific criteria are met. The City will use discretion in determining whether or not the fee in- lieu will be offered. If the fee is allowed, it will be based upon the amount of impervious surfaces • created; for every 2,640 square feet, or portion thereof. Please contact the Building Division for the current fee. Preliminary sizing calculations for any proposed water quality facility shall be submitted with the development application. It is anticipated that this project will require: ® Construction of an on-site water quality facility. Payment of the fee in-lieu. Water quality treatment is required for all new impervious surface added to the site. Calculations for sizing of water quality treatment facilities must be submitted to the Development Engineer for review and approval. Water quality facilities also must be reviewed and approved by the city. Review and comply with provisions of Chapter 4 Clean Water Services Design and Construction Standards (Runoff Treatment and Control). Other Comments: Water quality and detention facility design and construction must be certified by a professional engineer as meeting Clean Water Services requirements. TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAIL In 1990, Washington County adopted a county-wide Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)which was replaced in 2008 by a • Transportation Development Tax (TDT) that became effective 7/1/09. The TDT program collects fees from new development based on the development's projected impact upon the City's transportation system. The applicant shall be required to pay a fee based upon the number of trips which are projected to result from the proposed development. The calculation of the TDT incorporates the proposed use of the land and the size of the project. The TDT is calculated, due, and payable at the time of building permit issuance. In limited circumstances payment of the TDT may be allowed to be deferred until the issuance of an occupancy permit. Deferral of payment until occupancy is permissible only when the TDT exceeds the TDT rate for a single- family home. No TDT required. PERMITS Public Facility Improvement (PFI) Permit: Any work within a public right-of-way in the City of Tigard requires a PFI permit from Development Engineering. A PFI permit application is available at the Planning/Engineering counter in the Permit Center at City Hall. For more extensive work such as street widening improvements, main utility line extensions or subdivision infrastructure, plans prepared by a registered professional engineer must be submitted for review and approval. The PFI permit application shall include any on-site water quality and detention facilities that may be required as part of the land use approval. The Permittee will also be required to post a performance bond, or other such suitable security. Where • professional engineered plans are required, the Permittee must execute a Developer/Engineer CITY Of TIGAl U Pre-ipullicatien Cenlorence Notes Pegs 3 de esveopmam Fglmsfq Agreement, which will obligate the design engineer to perform the primary inspection of the public improvement construction work. The PFI permit fee structure is as follows: • NOTE: If a PFI Permit is required,the applicant must obtain that permit prior to release of any permits from the Building Division. If the project is performed as a CIP project under city management, a PFI Permit would not be applicable or required. If not, and Development Services is to monitor the project, then a PFI Permit would be required to cover any water quality treatment or detention facilities that may be required for the project. Building Division Permits: The following is a brief overview of the type of permits issued by the Building Division. For a more detailed explanation of these permits, please contact the Development Services Counter at 503-639-4171, ext. 304. Site Improvement Permit (SIT). This permit is generally issued for all new commercial, industrial and multi-family projects. This permit will also be required for land partitions where lot grading and private utility work is required. This permit covers all on-site preparation, grading and utility work. Home builders will also be required to obtain a SIT permit for grading work in cases where the lot they are working on has slopes in excess of 20% and foundation excavation material is not to be hauled from the site. Building Permit (BUP). This permit covers only the construction of the building and is issued after, or concurrently with, the SIT permit. • Master Permit (MST). This permit is issued for all single and multi-family buildings. It covers all work necessary for building construction, including sub-trades (excludes grading, etc.). This permit can not be issued in a subdivision until the public improvements are substantially complete and a mylar copy of the recorded plat has been returned by the applicant to the City. For a land partition, the applicant must obtain an Engineering Permit, if required, and return a mylar copy of the recorded plat to the City prior to issuance of this permit. Other Permits. There are other special permits, such as mechanical, electrical and plumbing that may also be required. Contact the Development Services Counter for more information. PREPARED BY: �-f �-�^-) p DEVE PMENT ENGINEER DATE Phone: [5031718-2470 Fax 15031718-274B Revised: September 2011 • CITY OF TICARD Pre-Ai mhcatioa Conference Notes Page 4 of 4 levotoonen faginearing ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS 411 ARBORIST REPORT Subject: Final Tree Protection Inspection Address of the Report: Jack Park Tigard, Oregon Date of the Report: November 4, 2013 Report Submitted To: Terry Flanagan Teragan & Assoc., Inc. 3145 Westview Circle Lake Oswego, Oregon Current Inspection This is the final tree protection inspection for this project All work appears to be complete except for railing installation on the bridge approaches. The railing installation should not conflict with tree protection. I met with Daniel from Green Thumb. He stated that work was complete and they were planning to remove tree protection fences this afternoon. Details of the inspection are as follow: • Tree protection maintenance has been greatly improved since the last inspection. However, the fence was sagging in several places. A section of the fence was open near the northeast side of the tree grove on the north side of the bridge. • Tree Protection Zones are being maintained free from material storage, waste material and equipment. • All other tree protection measures as stated in the plan for this site appear to be in place and being maintained. • The protected trees appear to be in good health at this time. Past Inspection The bridge had been set on its abutments and a skid steer loader was doing some grading work on the north end of the bridge at the time of this inspection. Details of the inspection are as follow: • Tree protection maintenance has been greatly Improved since the last inspection. However, the fence was sagging in several places. A section of the fence was open near the northeast side of the tree grove on the north side of the bridge. • Tree Protection Zones are being maintained free from material storage, waste material and equipment. • All other tree protection measures as stated in the plan for this site appear to be in place and being maintained. • The protected trees appear to be in good health at this time. may'' Kay Kinyon Teragan &Assoc., Inc. Certified Arborist by the International Society of Arboriculture, #PN-0409 • • John Floyd From: John Floyd Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 5:01 PM To: 'terry@teragan.com' Cc: 'Laura@herbonlandarch.com' Subject: RE: Inspeciton report on Jack Park Hi Terry, Thank you for the phonecall this afternoon. I somehow missed this email you sent. Here are answers to your questions. The removal of the 8" alder (#24) may proceed due to its condition, age, and proximity to the bridge. No permit is required. As for the Douglas Fir,just keep me posted of its status in your next report. Thanks again. John From: terry@teragan.com [mailto:terry@teragan.com] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 6:18 PM To: John Floyd Cc: 'Laura@herbonlandarch.com' Subject: Inspeciton report on Jack Park John, Attached is the report for the final acceptance for the tree protection measures that were installed per my requirements. During the inspection one of the trees was discovered to be leaning to the west where the bridge has to be installed. I am recommending that an 8 inch alder,#24 be removed to be able to place the bridge without endangering people or other trees. I need to know what we need to do to get the necessary permits if required. I will schedule inspections every two weeks from the last visit to the site. I will be on site Monday morning to observe the large diameter root from the Douglas-fir that is located under where the south bridge abutment is to be placed. The folks at the City have decided to prune the root. My next inspection will be Sept. 9 and then every two weeks there after unless called out to the site. Whenever I am called out to the site I will submit an inspection report and then schedule the next inspection two weeks later. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for all your help, Terry Terrence P. Flanagan ISA Board Certified Master Arborist PN-0120BMTL Certified Tree Risk Assessor# PN-0152 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Teragan &Associates, Inc. 1 A 3145 Westview Circle Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 503-803-0017 Cell 503-697-1975 Office 503-697-1976 http://www.teragan.com 2 • Teragan & Associates, Inc. Terrence P.Flanagan Arboricultural Consultants August 23, 2013 Laura Herbon Landscape Architect, LLC Laura Herbon 6824 SE 21st Avenue Portland, OR 97202 Project Title: Report on Tree Protection Status as of August 22, 2013 at Jack Park On Tuesday, August 20, 2013, I arrived on site at 1:30pm to inspect the tree protection fencing that had been finalized by Green Thumb Landscaping on the Jack Park project site. Green Thumb personal were to replace a number of the wooden stakes with steel stakes to allow for the use of the orange fencing in place of the metal fencing that was called for in the arborist's report for the project. The requested steel posts were placed for the project as required by the project arborist, Teragan & Associates, Inc. to accept the orange fencing instead of the metal fencing as called for in the tree protection report. In addition to the use of steel posts,the project arborist requires that site inspections be completed every two weeks to insure that the fence remains properly in place and the tree protection steps are properly followed. On arriving at the site on August 20, 2013, I observed a skid steer loader in the area that was designated as a `vegetated corridor enhancement planting area type 2. I was under the understanding that no mechanized machinery was to be utilized in this area or in any area south of the planned bridge abutment on the north side of the creek. As no equipment was expected in this area,no tree protection was called for or set up and the machinery was within areas that would have been set aside as tree protection areas. In addition, a backhoe was located in the area north of the main grove of Douglas-firs on the north side of the creek where no construction activity was to take place. The backhoe had been used to remove the sod and other plant material from the `vegetated corridor mitigation & enhancement planting area type 1' and was operating in areas where there was not to be any equipment and as such tree protection fencing was not in place. During this site visit it was pointed out that the location of the south bridge abutment was to be within the tree protection area that was set for tree number 14, a 50 inch diameter Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) that as set up to be 25 feet from the center of the tree. After discussion with various parties, it was determined that the tree protection fence on the west side of the tree had to be moved 10 feet closer to the tree in order to place the south bridge abutment. I approved the relocation of the tree protection fencing with the stipulation that the project arborist be on site during excavation to document any roots that might be encountered. It was also discovered that tree # 24, an 8 inch diameter red alder (Alnus rubra) has a significant lean to the west. The west leaning tree would be a concern during the placement of the bridge. The lean was not recorded as it was not known that it would have an impact on the bridge as the location of the bridge was not known during the completion of the tree inventory. There is a strong concern that the 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 •Phone(503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMTL Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists • • Jack Park Improvements 8/23/2013 Laura Herbon Page 2 of 3 bridge may snag the tree during its placement and cause either damage to the tree or cause the significant problems during the placement of the bridge. The tree is considered to be in poor condition and have a fair structure and is growing out of the north side of the creek bank. It would be best to remove the tree by cutting it down to a snag below the height of the bridge rather than take a chance with either damaging the tree or the bridge. In addition, any effort to swing the tree clear of tree #24 may lead to the bridge damaging other trees in the bridge corridor. We will need to get clearance from the City of Tigard to remove the tree. Discussion regarding how to properly re-seed the areas that were stripped down to bare soil resulted in the recommendation to lightly rototill no deeper than an inch or so to be able to break the sheen on the top of the soil created by the action of the backhoe stripping the vegetation without damaging roots in the area. The tree protection fencing was also to be extended on the north side of the large tree grove to extend east to the undisturbed grass area.No machinery except a hand operated rototiller is to be utilized within any tree protection area, south of the north bridge abutment location and north of the south bridge abutment location. On Site Observation of the Excavation of the East Wing Wall of the Bridge's South Abutment On August 22, 2013, Kay Kinyon from Teragan & Associates, Inc. was on site at loam to observe the excavation necessary for the footing and the east wing wall of the bridges south abutment. Also, Mr. Kinyon was to check that the tree protection for tree#14,the 50 inch diameter Douglas-fir was properly re-located per the discussion on August 20, 2013. The relocated tree protection fencing was found to be properly located. During the excavation by Green Thumb, a four inch and a seven inch diameter root were discovered. The four inch diameter root was properly pruned. The seven inch diameter root was considered to be too large to prune without notifying the City of Tigard to inform them of the potential for compromising the stability of the tree by cutting the root. The larger diameter root crosses over the location of where the east wing wall is to be located approximately three to five feet north of the south end of the east wing wall. We informed the City of the root issue and they were to discuss possible solutions. A RFI was issued and was addressed by the engineering company. They have suggested a cut out in the wall to allow the root to stay undisturbed. Teragan& Associates arborists are still concerned that with the fill that is to be placed within the wing walls that the depth of the fill will cause the root to die and cause the structural stability that the root provided to be lost and may cause the health of the tree to decline. The main concern is that the structural stability of the tree may be compromised to the point that the tree may be susceptible to failure during a strong fall/winter wind storm. The alternative to constructing an opening in the wall is to prune the root which ends up with the same concern of the tree failing. Another concern is that if an opening is created in the wing wall for the root and the tree fails, that the retain root may pull out part of the wing wall during the tree failure. The City will have to make the final decision as to how to handle the root. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 •Phone(503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMTL Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists Jack Park Improvements 8/23/2013 Laura Herbon Page 3 of 3 Conclusion While the intent of the tree protection measures was violated, it does not appear that any severe damage was done to any of the trees on the project site. The excavation of the east wall of the south bridge abutment that was completed under the observation of one of Teragan& Associates, Inc. arborists has resulted in the discovery of a large diameter root from the Douglas-fir tree. The final decision as to how the manage the root has not been made. The responsibility for that decision will be the City of Tigard's to make. Teragan & Associates, Inc. will provide as much information as possible to assist the City in making that decision but we will not be responsible for the final decision as no matter what is decided short of removing the tree Douglas-fir,there will be a potential for the tree to fail. Please call if you have any questions or concerns regarding this report. Sincerely, Terrence P. Flanagan ISA Board Certified Master Arborist, PN-0120, BMTL ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 •Phone(503)697-1975•Fax(503)697-1976•E-mail:terry@teragan.com ISA Board Certified Master Arborist,#PN-0120 BMTL Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists • • John Floyd From: terry@teragan.com Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 6:18 PM To: John Floyd Cc: 'Laura@herbonlandarch.com' Subject: Inspeciton report on Jack Park Attachments: 08-22-13, inspection report.pdf John, Attached is the report for the final acceptance for the tree protection measures that were installed per my requirements. During the inspection one of the trees was discovered to be leaning to the west where the bridge has to be installed. I am recommending that an 8 inch alder, #24 be removed to be able to place the bridge without endangering people or other trees. I need to know what we need to do to get the necessary permits if required. I will schedule inspections every two weeks from the last visit to the site. I will be on site Monday morning to observe the large diameter root from the Douglas-fir that is located under where the south bridge abutment is to be placed. The folks at the City have decided to prune the root. My next inspection will be Sept. 9 and then every two weeks there after unless called out to the site. Whenever I am called out to the site I will submit an inspection report and then schedule the next inspection two weeks later. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for all your help, Terry Terrence P. Flanagan ISA Board Certified Master Arborist PN-0120BMTL Certified Tree Risk Assessor# PN-0152 Member, American Society of Consulting Arborists Teragan &Associates, Inc. 3145 Westview Circle Lake Oswego, Oregon 97034 503-803-0017 Cell 503-697-1975 Office 503-697-1976 http://www.teragan.com 1 • • • John Floyd From: John Floyd Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:46 AM To: Jeff Peck Cc: Albert Shields; Dianna Howse Subject: FW: Jack Park Trees Hi Jeff, Thanks for talking with me about tree protection yesterday. Per our conversation I'm going to release the Jack Park sitework permit on two understandings. First,you will be submitting a second arborists report showing the remainder of the tree protection fencing is in place to the arborists's satisfaction following the completion of scheduled tree removal, as recommended in the arborist report of August 9, 2013. I understand this work is already being done (i.e. installation of metal posts), and the letter will verify that for the file. Second, biweekly arborist reports will be submitted thereafter. Based on my conversations with the project arborist,the periodic inspections would provide an acceptable level of protection (per the arborist) in light of the changes to the tree protection materials required in Condition of Approval Number 3. These documents can be submitted directly to me. Thanks again for your help on this, John From: John Floyd Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:21 PM To: Jeff Peck Cc: Tom McGuire; Kim McMillan Subject: RE: Jack Park Trees Thanks Jeff. My goal is keep you guys moving along given the window of summer weather you have to work with. I'm cognizant of how short it is, not trying to unnecessarily obstruct you. Given the fact that the snow fencing is up and the dry weather is quickly waning, it would probably be easiest to keep the orange fencing in place and work with the project arborist to find a protection regime equivalent to that proposed in the approved report. So you're aware, it was Parks that initially proposed the steel fencing,signs, and other protection elements in the arborists report and the project plans submitted for land use review. I'm having to work with what they proposed, but we'll be flexible to the degree we can. From: Jeff Peck Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:03 PM To: John Floyd Cc: Tom McGuire; Kim McMillan Subject: RE: Jack Park Trees John - Your attention to this request for tree removal is greatly appreciated and extremely timely. As the summer winds down, every day we save to keep moving forward on this project is a great help. Thanks again. 1 • • From: John Floyd Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 10:32 AM To: 'terry@teragan.com'; Jeff Peck Subject: RE: Jack Park Trees Hi Jeff and Terry, Attached is copy of the approved tree permit for your files. Thanks for getting us the paperwork so quickly. I am also confirming receipt of the arborist's report dated August 9, 2013. Thank you. There are a few outstanding items within, which I understand are to be implemented once scheduled tree removal is completed. Please forward a follow up report once the refinements are implemented. In regards to the change in material from steel to orange snow fencing, please have the arborists report indicate this will provide an equivalent level of protection. This would appear to satisfy the condition. Thanks, John From: John Floyd Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 9:56 AM To: terrvC)teragan.com; Jeff Peck Subject: Jack Park Trees Hi Terry and Jeff, I understand a couple of tree issues have come up in regards to the Jack Park project. First, I understand that an English Hawthorne needs to be removed. This tree is listed on our nuisance tree list,and can thus be removed despite its preservation in the Jack Park land use decision. The application form can be found here, please note the submittal requirements. No fee is required. Second, I have learned that orange netting is proposed in lieu of the six-foot metal fencing required in the approved arborist's report for this project(Tree Protection Step 2.d of Appendix#1). This would appear to contradict Condition of Approval Number 3 that requires protection measures be erected and followed consistent with the Arborists report. Let's discuss this when you have a chance. If a change in fence type is required we should discuss other mitigating changes to tree protection measures such as biweekly arborists report to ensure the orange netting is not being compromised. Thanks, John 2 • John Floyd 11111 City of Tigard Associate Planner Community Development (503)718-2429 johnfl tigard-or.gov 13125 S''VV Hall Blvd, Tigard, TIGAR DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." • • 0 • III 11111 MEMORANDUM TIGARD TO: John Floyd, Associate Planner— Community Development FROM: Jeff Peck, Senior Engineering Technician RE: Jack Park Conditions of Approval Response Letter DATE: August 1, 2013 Please accept this memo and attachments as an update on the Jack Park Improvement Project. COA 1. Prior to site work, the applicant shall submit to the City of Tigard Planning Division a copy of all applicable U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Oregon Department of State Lands, and Clean Water Services project authorization permits. Response: The project will not impact waterways, wetlands, and work will not be performed below the ordinary high waterline associated with Kreuger Creek. The project was designed to include a bridge which spans the creek above the ordinary high waterline eliminating impacts. As a result, State and Federal permits are not required. The CWS Stormwater Connection Authorization letter is attached. This condition is met. COA 2. Prior to issuance of any site work, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the Tigard Planning Division verifying all contractors have been notified of tree protection procedures through a meeting with all contractors to fully explain the goals of tree protection. Response: The Notice to Proceed was issued to begin work on July 31, 2013. The contractor will complete mobilizing equipment this week. The contractor, arborist, and City inspector will meet onsite Monday, August 5th, to discuss tree protection procedures. A letter or email will be sent to John Floyd acknowledging the tree protection meeting occurred. This condition shall be met. • • COA 3. Prior to issuance of any site work, the project arborist shall submit a letter to the Tigard Planning Division verifying that tree protection fencing has been erected in a location and manner consistent with the recommendations of the arborists report contained within the project file. Fencing is to remain in the position that is established by the project arborist and not to be moved without written permission from the project arborist until the end of the project. Response: Tree protection fencing installation will start next week. The project arborist will submit an email or letter to John Floyd when fence installation is completed. This condition shall be met. COA 4. (As written in the Final Decision) Response: The project arborist will be involved in the project during construction to ensure this condition will be met. i • John Floyd From: Jeff Peck Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:46 PM To: Albert Shields; John Floyd Cc: Kim McMillan; Zen Dutson; Kenny Fisher Subject: RE: SIT2013-00022, Jack Park Improvements Attachments: Conditions of Approval Update Letter 8-1-13.docx; CWS Stormwater Authorization letter.pdf Albert and John— Thank you for the heads up regarding the conditions of approval for Jack Park. Included is the Clean Water Services Authorization letter and a response memo letting you know where we are at in the process. Please let me know if you have questions or require additional information at this time. From: Albert Shields Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 10:57 AM To: Jeff Peck Subject: SIT2013-00022, Jack Park Improvements Jeff, Planning has the following comments on the site plan submitted: Conditions 1-5 of SLR2012-00003 have not been met. Please arrange to meet those conditions or, if they have been met but not recorded as such, contact the appropriate Planner and have the record updated, and then resubmit. A copy of the SLR Conditions is attached. Albert Shields. DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e-mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." 1 • • ARBORIST REPORT r` Subject: Tree Protection Inspection 2013 Address of the Report: Jack Park Tigard, Oregon 011P 3`I't +AREPING Date of the Report: August 9, 2013 KANN NGI,- Report Submitted To: Terry Flanagan Teragan and Associates, Inc. 3145 Westview Circle Lake Oswego, OR 97034 SUMMARY At 9:00 AM Terry Flanagan and I inspected the tree protection fence being installed at Jack Park for the bridge improvement. We met with Miguel Aleujandra from Green Thumb landscaping. For the most part, the fence installation meets the job specifications. The location of the fence is very close to the layout shown in the plans. Most of the required metal fence posts have been installed. However our inspection determined the following refinements need to be implemented. 1. Additional studded tee fence posts need to be installed. At least 2 more posts need to be installed for the fence at Tree #14. Three more need to be installed near the Red Alders across the pathway from Tree #14. Steel studded tee fence posts need to be installed in the fencing in front of Trees #52 and #53 after they are removed. Studded tee fence posts need to be installed in the fencing near the Cottonwoods across the pathway from the location of Trees #52 and #53. Steel fence posts need to be installed in place of the ones supporting the fencing near the existing main paved pathway and the basketball court. 2. Any wooden 2x2 fence posts that break or are damaged in the future need to be replaced with steel studded fence posts. 3. In many places the orange plastic mesh fencing is fastened to the posts with light weight string. Replace with plastic zip ties or wire ties. 4. None of the required signage has been installed. The signage needs to be installed. 5. The fence needs to be kept up right, taut and sag free at all times. 6. We recommend regular periodic inspection of the site during the active construction period to insure that all required tree protection measures are properly maintained. The current tree protection fence installation is adequate to proceed with the planned tree removals outside the fenced tree protection zones. We will inspect the site for implementation of all tree protection measures once the removals have been completed. Sincerely, Kay Kinyon Teragan and Associates, Inc. Certified Arborist by the International Society of Arboriculture, #PN-0409 1 Storm Water Connection Permit Authorization CleanWater Services Our commitment is clear. Permit Number SLR2012-0003 This Authorization to issue a Storm Water Connection Permit,in accordance with the requirements of Resolution and Order 07-20,including section 3.01.2,when signed and dated by the District,verifies that the District has reviewed the construction plans,as submitted by the City,and concurs that they are in accordance with the previously identified design standards and either, 1)the Service Provider Letter(SPL)or, 2)the Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment acting as the SPL issued for project and is in compliance with the District's water quality protection standards. This authorizes the Jurisdictional City to issue a Stormwater Connection Permit for the project. If modifications occur after the issuance of this letter which create a violation of the Service Provider Letter,then the Permit becomes null and void. It is the responsibility of the Jurisdictional City to notify Clean Water Services of changes that effect the Service Provider Letter. Service Provider Letter Number: 12-001787 Date of Service Provider Letter: September 13,2012 2S104AA04600, Map and Tax Lot#: 2S104AD04600,04501 Project Name: Jack Park Developer/Applicant: City of Tigard Jurisdictional City: Tigard Comments: CONCLUSION the-City,in-acreptinglbisAuthorization-for-permit-,and-authorizing-construction.of-permitted-activitiesrcertlfles-that ..all p2 ions of this project have been designed to CWS Design and Construction Standards.R&O 07-20,and have been reviewed and approved by the Jurisdictional City. Storm later Connection Permit authorized by: Date: 7/1/2013 Jackie Sue ump re 10/23/2007 E:\Development SvcslPlan Review\Storm Water Connection\StormWaterConnectionPermits archives\20131Tigard-Jack Park-07-01-2013 • TIGARD November 8, 2012 City of Tigard Steve Martin City of Tigard Parks Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97209 RE: Notice of Complete Application Submittal—MMD2012-00021 / SLR2012-00003 / SGN2012-00156 / TRE2012-00026 Dear Mr. Martin, The Planning Division has reviewed your application to construct a new trail and bridge at Jack Park, and associated changes to the TVF&R fire station parking lot. Our review has found the application substantially complete,pending the submittal of the following materials: • Ten additional sets of all application materials. • Two (2) sets of pre-stamped and pre-addressed envelopes for all property owners of record within 500 feet of the project site. Envelopes with metered postage or a return address will not be accepted. • One reduced size (8.5" by 11") set of reduced sized plans. • One (1) compact disc or flash drive with all materials in a searchable format (PDF for example). These materials are necessary to comply with the requirements of the Tigard Community Development Code. If these changes are not made, we cannot find your application consistent with approval criteria for a minor modification, and will be required to deny your proposal. Sincerely, John Floyd Associate Planner Attachment: Public Facility Plan Completeness Checklist Cc: Steve Duh, Conservation Technix 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov Land Use Application LIAO COMPLETENESS REVIEW REQUEST TIGARD TO: Greg Berry RETURN TO: John Floyd DATE SENT: October 29,2012 REPLY REQUESTED BY: November 13, 2012 PROJECT NAME: Jack Park Bridge/Trail CASE NUMBER: SLR2012-00003 / MMD2012-00021 PROJECT ADDRESS: Jack Park / TVF&R Walnut Station PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Addition of new bridge and trail within jack park,associated minor parking lot modifications xisting TVF&R station Complete? ►2 Yes ❑ No Comments below or ❑ See Attached Pit ri G(//v, S C •L _Al�b�G" is\curpin\masters\completeness review request.docx MARK VANDOMELEN JIM WOLF, CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER BUILDING OFFICIAL TIGARD POLICE DEPT INTEROFFICE MAIL INTEROFFICE MAIL TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE& RESCUE(TVF&R)NORTH DIV CLEAN WATER SERVICES (CWS) DEV SVC DEPT JOHN WOLFF, DEP FIRE MARSHALL DAVID SCHWEITZER/SWM PROGRAM 11945 SW 70th AVENUE 2550 SW HILLSBORO HWY TIGARD OR 97223-9196 HILLSBORO OR 97123 OR DEPT OF FISH &WILDLIFE- ELIZABETH RUTHER OR DIV OF STATE LANDS Per 08/07/12 email from Cheryl Caines- HABITAT BIOLOGIST NORTH IMLLAMETTEWATERSHEDDISTRICT Mf1 D documents for OR DIV OF STATE LANDS 18330 NW SAUVIE ISLAND ROAD 775 SUPIMCR ST NE SUITE 100 should be emailed per ODSL's SALEM OR 97301 1279 request:(do not send hard copies) PORTLAND OR 97231 https://forms.dsLstate.or.us/ ncdoc/?odsLwlun_notice US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS - KATHRYN HARRIS NAOM S: L-BEATTIE ROUTING CENWP OP G WA CO '••'T OF LAND USE &TRANS (DLUT) POB 2946 155 FIRS ,VE SUITE 350 MS 13 PORTLAND OR 97208-2946 HILLS:ORO 97124 OR DEPT OF ENV QUALITY (DEQ) TRI- TT'ANSIT DVLPMT REGIONAL ADMNISTRATOR BEN BA.',WIN, PROD PLANNER 2020 SW FOURTH AVE STE 400 710 N iDAY ST PORTLAND OR 97201-4987 PORTL ND • 97232 411 CITY OF TIGARD REQUEST FOR •MENTS NOTIFICATION LIST FOR LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FILE NOS.: FILE NAME: CITY OFFICES _C.D.ADMINISTRATION, ,CD Director _DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/ /Arborist _PUBLIC WORKS/Mike Stone,City Engineer _C.D.ADMINISTRATION/ ,Asst.CD Director _BUILDING DIVISION/Mark VanDomelen,Building Official _HEARINGS OFFICER(+2 sets) _CITY ADMINISTRATIONYCathy Wheatley,City Recorder _POLICE DEPARTMENT/Jim Wolf,Crime Prevention Officer _PLANNING COMMISSION(+12 sets) _DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/Planning-Engineering Techs. PUBLIC WORKS/Brian Rager,Assistant PW Director _FILE/REFERENCE(+2 sets) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/ Development Eng. _PUBLIC WORKS/Steve Martin,Parks Manager SPECIAL DISTRICTS_ TUAL.HILLS PARK&REC.DIST.*) JALATIN VALLEY FIRE&RESCUE* _ TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT* CLEAN WATER SERVICES Planning Manager orth Division Administrative Office evelopment Services Department 15707 SW Walker Road John Wolff,Deputy Fire Marshall 1850 SW 170''Avenue David Schweitzer/SWM Program Beaverton,OR 97006 14480 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton,OR 97006 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Beaverton,OR 97005-1152 Hillsboro,OR 97123 LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONS CITY OF BEAVERTON ik _ CITY OF TUALATIN AIL _OR.DEPT.OF FISH&WILDLIFE /FOR.DIV.OF STATE LANDS _ Planning Manager Planning Manager Elizabeth Ruther,Habitat Biologist lutll elinda Wood(vLUN Form Required) _ Steven Sparks,Dev.Sias.Manager 18880 SW Martinazzi Avenue North Willamette Watershed District 775 Summer Street NE,Suite 100 PO Box 4755 Tualatin,OR 97062 18330 NW Sauvie Island Road Salem,OR 9 7301-1 2 79 Beaverton,OR 97076 Portland,OR 97231 _ OR.PUB.UTILITIES COMM. METRO-LAND USE&PLANNING* _OR.DEPT.OF GEO.&MINERAL IND. 550 Capitol Street NE _ CITY OF DURHAM * 600 NE Grand Avenue 800 NE Oregon Street,Suite 5 Salem,OR 97310-1380 City Manager Portland,OR 97232-2736 Portland,OR 97232 17160 SW Upper Boones Fry.Rd. Joanna Mensher,Dora Resource Center(ZCA-Adopted) US ARMY CORPS.OF ENG. Durham,OR 97224 Paulette Copperstone,(zcA-RFO Only) OR.DEPT.OF LAND CONSERV.&DVLP. Kathryn Harris(Maps acws Leiter Only). _ 0.Gerald Uba,Ph.D.,(CP JDCA/ZON) Mara Ulloa(Comp.Plan AmendmeMs a Measure 37) Routing CENWP-OP-G _CITY OF KING CITY* 635 Capitol Street NE,Suite 150 PO Box 2946 City Manager Salem,OR 97301-2540 Portland,OR 97208-2946 15300 SW 116th Avenue King City,OR 97224 WASHINGTON COUNTY _ OR.DEPT.OF ENERGY(Pawedines in Area) OR. DEPT OF AVIATION(Monopole Towers) Dept.of Land Use&Transp. Bonneville Power Administration Tom Highland,Planning 155 N.First Avenue _ CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO * Routing TTRC—Attn: Renae Ferrera 3040 25th Street,SE Suite 350,MS 13 Planning Director PO Box 3621 Salem,OR 97310 Hillsboro,OR 97124 PO Box 369 Portland,OR 97208-3621 _Naomi Vogel-Beattie(General Apt Lake Oswego,OR 97034 _Brent Curtis(CPA) _ OR.DEPT.OF ENVIRON.QUALITY(DEO) ODOT,REGION I * _Assessment&Taxation(ZCA)MS 9 _CITY OF PORTLAND (Notify for Wetlands and Potential EnvronmemalImpaas) —Development Review Coordinator Dula Mateja,Cartography(ZCA)MS14 Planning Bureaur Director Regional Administrator _Carl Torland, Right-of-Way Section(vacations) 1900 SW 4 Avenue,Suite 4100 2020 SW Fourth Avenue,Suite 400 123 NW Flanders Portland,OR 97201 Portland,OR 97201-4987 Portland,OR 97209-4037 OR.WA.CO.CONSOL.COMM.AGNCY _ODOT,REGION 1 -DISTRICT 2A* _ODOT,RAIL DIVISION STATTEE HISTORIC Dave Austin(wcecA)"sir ponefelaToweral Chad Gordon,Assistant District Manager (Notify It ODOT R/R-Hwy.Crossing is Only Annoy to Land) PRESERVATION OFFICE PO Box 6375 6000 SW Raab Road Dave Lanning,sr.Crossing Safely Specialist (Notify It Properly Has HD Overlay) Beaverton,OR 97007-0375 Portland,OR 97221 555-13th Street,NE,Suite 3 725 Sumner St.NE,Suite C Salem,OR 97301-4179 Salem,OR 97301 UTILITY PROVIDERS AND SPECIAL AGENCIES _PORTLAND WESTERN R/R,BURLINGTON NORTHERN/SANTA FE RJR,OREGON ELECTRIC R/R(Burlington Northern/Santa Fe R/R Predecessor) Bruce Carswell, President&General Manager 200 Hawthorne Avenue SE,Suite C320 Salem,OR 97301-5294 _SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANS.CO.RJR _METRO AREA COMMUNICATIONS _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _TRI-MET TRANSIT DVLPMT. Clifford C.Cabe,Construction Engineer Debra Palmer(Annexations Only) Gerald Backhaus(See Nap tam.coycn (If Protect swlthlnY.Mlle ofa Transit Roule) 5424 SE McLoughlin Boulevard Twin Oaks Technology Center 14200 SW Brigadoon Court Ben Baldwin,Project Planner Portland,OR 97232 1815 NW 169th Place,S-6020 Beaverton,OR 97005 710 NE Holladay Street Beaverton,OR 97006-4886 Portland,OR 97232 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC _NW NATURAL GAS COMPANY _VERIZON _CENTURYLINK Mike Hieb Svc.Design Consultant Scott Palmer,Engineering Coord. John Cousineau,OSP Network Lynn Smith 9480 SW Boeckman Road 220 NW Second Avenue 4155 SW Cedar Hills Blvd. Right-of-Way Manager,OR&SW Wilsonville,OR 97070 Portland,OR 97209-3991 Beaverton,OR 97005 8021 SW Capitol Hill Road Portland,OR 97219 _TIGARD/TUALATIN SCHOOL DIST.#23J BEAVERTON SCHOOL DIST.#48 _COMCAST CABLE CORP. _COMCAST CABLE COMMUNIC. Teri Brady,Administrative Offices Jennifer Garland, Demographics Alex Silantiev(See Map vox.,.,ceded) Brian Every(App.a of HAM etaw4 6960 SW Sandburg Street 16550 SW Merlo Road 9605 SW Nimbus Avenue, Bldg. 12 10831 SW Cascade Avenue Tigard,OR 97223-8039 Beaverton,OR 97006-5152 Beaverton,OR 97008 Tigard,OR 97223-4203 * INDICATES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION IN COMPLIANCE WITH INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT IF WITHIN$00'OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR ANT/ALL CITY PROJECTS(Project Planner Is Responsible For Indicating Parties To Notify). I:ICURPLN1Masten\Request For Comments Notification List.doc (UPDATED:Jul 11,2012) (If you update this roster,also update:I:\CURPLN1Mastersl Request for Comments Notification Labels.doc)(This document is password protected.Please see Chris or Doreen if you need updates, Thank you.) COHNSRERVATION T E C N I 25 October 2012 _ ita 9 'o12 /7y City of Tigard p�NNC/l�l OF r/(a Planning Division ��FNr O c/o John Floyd C'9/NG 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard,OR 97223 RE: Response to Completeness Letter dated 10/16/12:Jack Park Addition (MMD2012-00021 / SLR2012-00003 / SGN2012-00156 / TRE2012-00026) Dear Mr. Floyd The applicant and the project team reviewed the Completeness Letter for the above stated project.The application materials have been adjusted to meet the requirements outlined in the Letter,and the following edits have been made: Completeness Item#1: Impervious Calculations • A calculation of new impervious surface area was the only request of Greg Berry of Engineering for this application.The Storm Water Drainage Report(Appendix H) includes the requested calculation.This completeness item has been fulfilled. Completeness Item #2: Discussion of culvert • A discussion regarding culvert removal was requested if it is still a component of the project.As shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet L0.2),two failed pipe culvert exist on site in the area of Krueger Creek, at the southern foot of trees #25 and#26. The narrative responding to Section 18.775.020.0 has been revised to address the planned removal of one pipe culvert located within Krueger Creek. This completeness item has been fulfilled. As requested via the email dated October 16,2012,two copies of the revised narrative and site plan have been provided for re-submittal for the final completeness check on this application. It is my understanding that the additional sets and the addressed envelopes will be provided after the project is deemed complete. Please contact me at 503-989-9345 with any questions. Sincerely, e`D uh Principal C nservation Technix, Inc. On behalf of City of Tigard Steve Martin,Parks and Facilities Manager PO Box 12736 • Portland,OR 97212 • 503.989.9345 (p) • 503.287.4389 (t www.conservationtecbnix.corn • • TIGARD October 16, 2012 City of Tigard Steve Martin City of Tigard Parks Division 13125 SW Hall Blvd Tigard, OR 97209 RE: Notice of Incomplete Application Submittal—MMD2012-00021 / SLR2012-00003 / SGN2012-00156 / TRE2012-00026 Dear Mr. Martin, The Planning Division has reviewed your application to construct a new trail and bridge at Jack Park, and associated changes to the TVF&R fire station parking lot. Unfortunately we have found it incomplete and require additional information (listed below). Completeness Item#1 Please see attached Public Facility Plan Completeness Checklist, and provide the requested information. Completeness Item #2 Application materials received on September 17, 2012 do not appear to include discussion or site plan references to an existing culvert within the vicinity of the proposed bridge. In contrast, materials submitted for the April 3, 2012 pre-application conference do include culvert removal and restoration consistent with implementation of the Healthy Streams Plan. Please clarify whether or not culvert removal remains a part of this project, and revise the narrative and site plans accordingly. Please note, the removal of an existing culvert and associated restoration work will qualify for an exemption from Sensitive Lands Review under 18.790.020.C.3 (stream and wetlands restoration and enhancement programs). The enhancement would be the removal of a barrier to fish passage, improved flood flows, and the restoration of other natural functions and processes. As a replacement consistent with the Parks Master Plan and Healthy Streams Plan (is this a culvert referenced in Map I-5 of that same document?), there is a programmatic nature to the task. See also page 6 of the pre-application conference notes for more detail. These changes are necessary to comply with the requirements of the Tigard Community Development Code. If these changes are not made, we cannot find your application consistent with approval criteria for a minor modification, and will be required to deny your proposal. Sincerely, John Floyd Associate Planner 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov . 0 Attachment: Public Facility Plan Completeness Checklist Cc: Steve Dub, Conservation Technix PUBLIC FACILITY PLAN • • Project: Jack Park MMD12-21 COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Date: 9-27-12 GRADING ® Existing and proposed contours shown. ® Are there grading impacts on adjacent parcels? No ® Adjacent parcel grades shown. ® Geotech study submitted? STREET ISSUES ❑ Right-of-way clearly shown. NR ❑ Centerline of street(s) clearly shown. NR ® Street name(s) shown. ❑ Existing/proposed curb or edge of pavement shown. NR ❑ Street profiles shown. NR ❑ Future Street Plan: Must show street profiles, topo NR on adjacent parcel(s), etc. ❑ Traffic Impact and/or Access Report NR ❑ Street grades compliant? NR ❑ Street/ROW widths dimensioned and appropriate? NR ❑ Private Streets? Less than 6 lots and width NA appropriate? ❑ Other: SANITARY SEWER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown. ❑ Stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? I NR WATER ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines w/sizes noted? ® Existing/proposed fire hydrants shown? ❑ Proposed meter location and size shown? NR ❑ Proposed fire protection system shown? NR STORM DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY ISSUES ® Existing/proposed lines shown? ❑ Preliminary sizing calcs for water quality/detention provided? ❑ Water quality/detention facility shown on plans? Show increased impervious surface area ❑ Area for facility match requirements from calcs? ❑ Facility shown outside any wetland buffer? ❑ Storm stubs to adjacent parcels required/shown? The submittal is hereby deemed El COMPLETE ® INCOMPLETE By: ' 4.67..47 Date: 9-27-12 REVISED: 09/27/12