The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet - 02/09/2021 �! ' City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL& LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 9,2021 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Remote participation only. See PUBLIC NOTICE below. PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with the City of Tigard's Emergency Declaration related to COVID-19 and Oregon House Bill 4212, this will be a virtual meeting where Council and staff will participate remotely. There will be no in-person public testimony during this meeting. How to comment:Written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments. All comments must be submitted before 4:30 p.m. the day of the meeting.If you prefer to call in,please call 503-966-4101 between 7:00 and 7:15 p.m. to be placed in the queue. We ask that you plan on limiting your testimony to three minutes. There are two Public Hearings. Please refer to Agenda Items No. 4—Consider Adoption of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment and No. 6—Local Contract Review Board: Consider Revisions to the City's Public Contracting Rules for information and estimated times to provide phone-in testimony. Note that the times are estimated. SEE ATTACHED AGENDA VIEW LIVESTREAM ONLINE: http://www.tiaard-or.gov/city hall/council meeting.php CABLE VIEWERS: The first City Council meeting of the month may be shown live on Channel 28 at 6:30 p.m. The meeting will be rebroadcast at the following times on Channel 28: Thursday 6:00 p.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. Friday 10:00 p.m. Monday 6:00 a.m. III " City of Tigard Tigard Business Meeting —Agenda TIGARD TIGARD CITY COUNCIL & LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD MEETING DATE AND TIME: February 9, 2021 - 6:30 p.m. Study Session; 7:30 p.m. Business Meeting MEETING LOCATION: Remote participation only. 6:30 PM •STUDY SESSION A. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property negotiations,under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 6:30 p.m. estimated time 7:30 PM 1. BUSINESS MEETING A. Call to Order-Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board B. Roll Call C. Pledge of Allegiance D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items 2. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Written Public Comment Received by 4:30 p.m. today B. Phone in public comment C. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment D. Tigard High School Student Envoy E. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce F. Update from Police Chief McAlpine 3. CONSENT AGENDA: (Tigard City Council&Local Contract Review Board) The Consent Agenda is used for routine items including council meeting minutes and approval of contracts or intergovernmental agreements. Information on each item is available on the city's website in the packet for this meeting. These items may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Council members may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. A. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: •August 11, 2020 •August 18, 2020 •September 8, 2020 B. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: CONSIDER CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY (ASR) WELLS 2 & 3 REFURBISHMENT C. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AMENDMENT #1 WITH DLR GROUP •Consent A2enda-Items Removed for Separate Discussion:Any items requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion will be considered immediately after the Council/Town Center Development Agency has voted on those items which do not need discussion. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT To comment by phone call 503-966-4101 7:50 p.m. estimated time 5. CONCURRENCE WITH MAXIMUM INDEBTEDNESS INCREASE FOR THE TIGARD CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN 8:20 p.m. estimated time 6. PUBLIC HEARING (LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD) CONSIDER REVISIONS TO THE CITY'S PUBLIC CONTRACTING RULES To comment by phone call 503-966-4101 8:30 p.m.estimated time 7. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION WAIVING BUSINESS LICENSE LATE FEES 8:40 p.m. estimated time 8. CONSIDER PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AT 8686 SW OAK STREET AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY TO COMPLETE THE TRANSACTION 8:50 p.m. estimated time 9. NON-AGENDA ITEMS 10. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 11. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to discuss real property negotiations,under ORS 192.660(2) (e). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the Session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 9:05 p.m. estimated time 12. ADJOURNMENT 9:35 p.m. estimated time i TIGARD Meeting of the Tigard Council February 9, 2021 Written Public Comment Received — Agenda Item No. 4 Date Received Submitted By Subject 2/3/2021 Erin August Not in support- City Center Urban Renewal-Make it Cool 2/8/2021 Karin Kelsey How it is affected by light rail? In support—City Center Urban 2/8/2021 Carine Arendes Renewal Sub.Amendment In support—City Center Urban 2/8/2021 Ryan Ruggiero Renewal Sub.Amendment Carol Krager From: noreply@revize.com Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 7:31 PM To: Carol Krager Cc: Caroline Patton Subject: Public Comments Attachments: Renewal not Fool.docx Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Block sender Name= Erin August EmailAddress= Address=12810 SW WALNUT ST Tigard, OR 97223 Topic=Downtown Urban Renewal No, I don't support= Don't Support FeedBackText= Let my letter speak for me. If there must be urban renewal, make it cool or be a fool. Client IP=50.53.64.160 1 Renewal not Fool I have lived in Tigard almost all of my life.I grew up here.I rode my bike to Town Hall when the library was there. And then further when the new building was built.I've seen the old Windmill on 121st so many times.I think the old buildings are cool because they aren't dime-a-dozen. All I saw in the literature was that you plan to tear down old buildings and put in new(ugly)ones in their place.Part of what makes downtown special to me is the different styles and eras displayed on Main Street.The art is nice but the true soul are the buildings and that little park on the north end with the big evergreen tree we light up every year for the holidays.The bank in the little white brick building.The buildings on both sides of it.Buildings north of Commercial on the east side of the road can go.Strip mall architecture is never attractive. I agree that the multi-use Attwell Off Main Apartments is a good idea;stores on the ground floor and living up top but to be blunt,the whole building should be wearing a paper bag.If you are going to spend millions of dollars during an economic crisis and a global pandemic,at least build buildings that are actually attractive.And not all tall and tight together,which can give an unpleasant,looming feel to Main Street.Look at old photos,choose architecture from 1920 and earlier.Even midcentury has good ideas.Look to the new building south of the liquor store for an example of how NOT to build.Bare concrete says'we're too unimaginative,poor,and/or cheap to build something nice and interesting'.And that is not the image Tigard should be giving.Tigard is beautiful with its heritage and uniquely built buildings not just in downtown but throughout town.Information points with old photos and talk of the history of the location(like next to Symposium Coffee),artwork,and plantings encourage people on foot not to hurry to their destination without slowing down to look around.Maybe buy more than they originally planned.Plant native,low-maintenance,and interesting.Not many people know that there are native roses or that we have a bush called a Wahoo.The bare dirt in front of the white bank building could use something living. Maybe try a brick façade and some 1900 turn of the century architectural touches.Or bricks that are painted different colors at random.Letting street artists and regular artists paint over the bare concrete already (unfortunately)present in that new building on Main Street. Slapping up cookie-cutter buildings and calling it renewal is not Tigard.It would not make me want to stop and walk around.It would tell me that there is nothing in this downtown that I haven't seen a dozen times before.People are building in that same bare and boring concrete style all over the tri-county area(except parts of Lake Oswego, who have better taste).Urban Renewal means making things better.Tearing down unique old buildings to be replaced with what everyone else is building would renew nothing.And that would be a mistake that Tigard should not make. Stay Safe, Erin August Tigard resident almost thirty years running Carol Krager From: noreply@revize.com Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 9:02 AM To: Carol Krager Cc: Caroline Patton Subject: Public Comments Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Block sender Name= Karin Kelsey EmailAddress= Address= 10393 SW Akilean Ter Topic=Downtown Tigard amendment FeedBackText=Question...How will the proposed amendment integrate with the proposed Hwy 99/Barbur light rail? Client IP=73.157.190.67 1 Carol Krager From: Carine Arendes Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 12:14 PM To: #Councilmail Cc: Carol Krager; Sean Farrelly Subject: Re: [Council-agenda] Tigard City Council Agenda and Packet for February 9, 2021 Business Meeting Attachments: Testimony_CC-URD_SubstantialAmendment_Arendes.pdf Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender Testimony for Feb 9th Meeting of Council Agenda Item #4 for record should be attached. Thank you. Carine Arendes 503-619-5489 (text) On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:33 PM Carol Krager<carolkPtigard-or.gov>wrote: The meeting agenda and packet for the Tigard City Council February 9th business meeting are available now.You can find the Agenda and Meeting Packet on the Citv's website here. A copy of the agenda is also attached to this email for your convenience. Please note that in accordance with the City of Tigard's Emergency Declaration related to COVID-19 and Oregon House Bill 4212,this will be a virtual meeting where Council and staff will participate remotely.You can livestream the broadcast,or watch later on the City's YouTube channel. There will be no in-person public testimony but written public comment may be submitted electronically at www.tigard-or.gov/Comments All comments must be submitted before 4:30 p.m.on the day of the meeting. If you prefer to call in, please call 503-966-4101 at the beginning of the business meeting(7:30 p.m.)to be placed in the queue for general comments. There are also two Public Hearings. Please refer to Agenda Items No.4—Consider Adoption of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment and No.6—Local Contract Review Board:Consider Revisions to the City's Public Contracting Rules for information and estimated times to provide phone-in testimony. Note that the times are estimated. 1 Additional questions?We're here to help. Reply directly to this email with any other inquiries or concerns. Carol Krager City Recorder City of Tigard 13125 SW Hall Blvd. Tigard,OR 97223 (503) 718-2419 carolkna.ti-and-or.pov DISCLAIMER: E-mails sent or received by City of Tigard employees are subject to public record laws. If requested, e- mail may be disclosed to another party unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law. E-mails are retained by the City of Tigard in compliance with the Oregon Administrative Rules "City General Records Retention Schedule." Council-agenda mailing list Council-agenda@lists.tigard-or.gov httos://lists.caoalon.com/lists/listi nfo/council-agenda 2 To: Mayor Snider and the Tigard City Council Cc: Carol Krager, City Recorder;Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Project Manager Re: Testimony for Agenda Item #4. Adoption of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Feb 8, 2021 To Mayor Snider and City Councilors, I'm writing in support of the proposed substantial amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. I served on the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC)/Town Center Advisory Commission (TCAC)for six years, including 3 years as the Chair of the Commission. City staff and Commissioners have long recognized that existing limits in the current plan would not serve the City Center District(nor the city's goals for the district) well in the long run. In 2015, CCAC submitted a report to the Tigard Development Agency and its Board of Directors recommending that the plan be amended to extend the life of the City Center Urban Renewal District (District) and consider how to revise the District's project to meet current needs (see Recommendations p 19,Attachment A). Due to the Great Recession, district funding was slow to accumulate, and projects were therefore limited in size and impact. However,the district gained momentum through projects such as the Atwell on Main and the Tigard Heritage Trail and the location of unique places to shop (Jeffery Allen Gallery and Curiosities) and play(Paddle Palace, Stumptown Escape and Versus Board Games). We've also had a delicious revival of food &drink establishments (Max's, Bailey's, Deli Hut, Symposium,Senet Game Bar,Tigard Tap House, etc.). Keeping this momentum going, especially in the time of Covid, requires both a commitment to continue this work beyond 2025 and a consideration of projects not on our radar when the original plan was adopted in 2005. The TCAC have worked with city staff to identify crucial new projects that are needed in the District now. This includes a number of capital projects that have the potential to transform how the District functions such as new streets, sidewalks and trail improvements, as well of projects that will make District welcoming to everyone such as a modern parking facility,affordable housing and our own downtown public plaza. If we want to continue to invest in a downtown that will serve the needs of our city and our residents,the time is act is now. I urge the Council to adopt the proposed substantial amendment to continue our work building a downtown that is walkable and accessible regardless of age or ability and provides welcoming spaces to work, play and recreate for everyone in our diverse community. Sincerely, Carine Arendes 9524 SW North Dakota St.Tigard, OR 97223 Attachment A . ,, Al.. ilf 1 /��g°{1 . ,.,, t . RA'9'R P. ' ; B7! A� � �"f' � �.� "f �GQ �t6 �` I le la IssA r. Q n' ' l I� ----ter—_� G. .� q.,. ' a�• i { ' , Y� ` i ....- I 11111111":"111A f : r.: -':-71,,*.! +Utl�rV ,t. • —•—l._t t • . - .= 1 , tea. • 0 ,,% Downtown . ,„ TEN YEARS ON: TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT 2015 CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS A CITY OF TIGARD CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION REPORT TO THE CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ON THE PROGRESS AND POTENTIAL OF THE TIGARD CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT IN 2015 Attachment A 2015 CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSIONERS CARINE ARENDES, CHAIR LINLI PAO,VICE CHAIR DEANIE BUSH JOYCE CASEY SHERRIE DEVANEY LAURA FISHER PAUL MILLER LYNN SCROGGIN RICHARD SHAVEY RAVI NAGARAJ CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD CHAIR JOHN COOK DIRECTOR GOODHOUSE DIRECTOR HENDERSON DIRECTOR SNIDER DIRECTOR WOODARD GRATITUDE AND RESPECT IS EXTENDED TO THE MANY DOWNTOWN BUSINESS OWNERS AND MERCHANTS WHO, REGARDLESS OF OTHER OBLIGATIONS, CONTINUE TO INVEST IN AND PARTICIPATE AS PARTNERS WORKING TO IMPROVE TIGARD'S CITY CENTER THE CURRENT CCAC ALSO ACKNOWLEDGES THE WORK AND PASSION OF THE PRIVATE CITIZENS, PREVIOUS TIGARD DOWNTOWN TASK FORCE MEMBERS AND CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF TIGARD STAFF,AND CITY CENTER DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEMBERS WHO ARTICULATE AND PROMOTE THE VISION OF A THRIVING DOWNTOWN TIGARD This report was prepared by the City Center Advisory Commission and as such is not an official statement of policy by the City of Tigard.The CCAC has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information included in this report, however,the information is provided"as is"without guarantee of any kind. Attachment A TEN YEARS ON: TIGARD URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT- 2015 CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 BACKGROUND 7 PROGRESS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTS 9 URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT ACCOMPLISHMENTS 10 POTENTIAL IN THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTS 12 NEW INITIATIVES IN THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT 12 FUNDING AND FINANCING 13 CONCLUSION 17 RECOMMENDATIONS 18 APPENDICES APPENDIX A-GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND USEFUL DEFINITIONS 22 APPENDIX B-URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT MAP 23 APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH 24 Attachment A this page intentionally left blank Attachment A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) is an advisory citizen committee charged with advising the Board of the City Center Development Agency(CCDA), composed of the members of City Council, on policy matters related to the Urban Renewal District (URD) and implementing the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP). At the January 2015 CCAC meeting, the commission resolved to review the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. This report is the outcome of the CCAC's review of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan that occurred over multiple monthly meetings in 2015. This review was considered timely due to a number of factors. One, the amount of time that has elapsed since the URP was adopted; two, the significant improvement in the real estate market subsequent to the recession of 2008; and the amount of recent activity occurring in the Downtown area. The intent of this report is to review identified projects in the URP, take note of the implementation to-date, consider the potential of completing plan projects, prioritize projects not yet started, and make recommendations regarding future implementation of projects identified in the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP). This report is not intended to be either an assessment of policy outcomes or a fiscal review of the URD budget. A number of City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP) projects are identified in the city's 2015- 2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), including the Fanno Creek Remeander project, Main Street\Green Street Phase II and the Tigard Street Trail (also referred to as the Tigard Heritage Trail and the Rail to Trail project in various city documents). The CCAC supports the implementation of these URP projects. In addition to the projects currently planned and funded for near-to-mid-term implementation though the CIP mentioned above, the following URP identified projects are also considered priorities for implantation: a) fill-in gaps of Hall Blvd sidewalks, b) plaza(s) development, c) the Tigard Street Trail & Tigard Street on-street bicycle lane, and d) public restrooms. The report presents background information first, then notes progress to date in the URD, followed by the potential to complete remaining projects identified in the URP. Additional supplemental material can be found in the appendices. The report concludes with recommendations for future consideration by the CCDA. Recommendations include developing a citywide development policy incorporating incentives, identify funding for projects identified in this review, incorporate URP identified projects into other projects, considering an Expedited Permitting fee and installation payments for System Development Charges, and amending the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP). City Center Advisory Commission 6 Attachment A BACKGROUND THE VISION:A THRIVING DOWNTOWN The City of Tigard developed a vision for a thriving downtown through a public process in the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan. Property owners and developers play a crucial role in shaping development in the city center; however the public sector also has a role to play. At the end of 2005, the City Center City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP) was completed and in 2006, a voter supported Urban Renewal District was adopted to help implement the vision. The creation of the Urban Renewal District (URD) allows the city to leverage property tax revenue through Tax Increment Funds (TIF)to provide infrastructure and other physical improvements within the URA. The URP serves as a blueprint for these activities and identifies projects Tax Increment Fund revenue generated in the URD can be spent on. THE CITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMISSION The purpose of the City Center Advisory Commission (CCAC) is to assist Tigard's urban renewal commission, the City Center Development Agency (CCDA) in developing and carrying out the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. The (CCAC is an advisory citizen committee charged with advising the City Center Development Agency CCDA), composed of the members of City Council, on policy matters related to the Urban Renewal District and implementing the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. At the January 2015 CCAC meeting, the commission set goals and objectives for the Commission to accomplish in 2015. One primary task was to review the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. This report is the outcome of the CCAC's review of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan that occurred over multiple monthly meetings in 2015. TIGARD'S URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT The creation of an URD is governed by specific statutory rules and authorizes the CCDA to utilize a number of powers to implement a project identified in an approved City Center Urban Renewal Plan, including acquisition and disposition of real property, borrow and receive monies for the undertaking of projects and fund activities through the annual increments (ORS 457.170). As previously mentioned, the tax increment financing provides a mechanism to leverage increases in property tax revenue (increment)to provide infrastructure and other physical improvements within the URD. TIGARD URD FAST FACTS Purpose: Developed to provide a funding stream to implement the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan (TDIP). The tools provided by urban renewal, including tax increment financing, are intended to attract private investment and facilitate the area's redevelopment. Extent: The City Center URD covers 193 acres in the downtown area (see Attachment C for a map of the area) Maximum indebtedness: $22 million Duration: 20 years: 2005-2025 City Center Advisory Commission 7 Attachment A Investment: Transportation and infrastructure improvements Project and Programs: TDIP catalyst projects and public facility projects, as well as technical assistance programs such as a façade improvement program, rehabilitation/redevelopment grants, and loan programs CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN The City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP) not only satisfies statutory requirements in ORS Chapter 457, the URP itself and the identified projects were vetted through a series of processes requiring public input, including the adoption of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP) by the Tigard City Council in 2005 and approval by the voters of Tigard in 2006. It should be noted that the URP may be amended by the CCDA, includes provisions to amend the plan. ORGANIZATION The URP is structured around a series of goals that represent the basic purpose of the Plan. Objectives for each goal guide how the goals will be accomplished. Policies that the URP is intended to support are identified, including goals and policy directives contained in the Natural Features and Open Space, Economy, Housing, Transportation and Special Areas of Concern sections of the Comprehensive Plan, the Transportation System Plan, the Downtown Improvement Plan and the Community Development Code. Urban renewal projects are identified that implement the objectives of the URP. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The following goals and objectives are excerpts from the City Center Urban Renewal Plan: ONE Goal: Revitalization of the Downtown should recognize the value of natural resources as amenities and as contributing to the special sense of place. Objectives: A: integrate open space and landscaping elements into the design and development of public improvement projects identified in the Plan to create a livable environment and provide opportunities for multimodal recreational use. B: Minimize the impact of public improvements and facilities projects on the natural environment through the integration of appropriate protective measures and mitigation strategies. TWO Goal: Capitalize on Commuter Rail and Fanno Creek as catalysts for future investment and development. Objectives: A: Support the development of transit-oriented residential, commercial, employment and recreational uses in the Central Business District that will benefit from and support commuter rail. City Center Advisory Commission 8 Attachment A B: Implement pedestrian and bicycle system improvements that will enhance connectivity between downtown and surrounding residential and commercial areas. THREE Goal:Downtown's transportation system should be multi-modal, connecting people, places and activities safely and conveniently. Objectives: A: Design and construct street improvements as consistent with the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan and the Tigard Transportation System Plan. B: Concurrent with proposed street improvements, and in conformance with the Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP), provide bike lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and other pedestrian and bicycle facilities that promote multimodal usage, access and safety. FOUR Goal:Downtown's streetscape and public spaces should be pedestrian-friendly and not visually dominated by the automobile. Objectives: A: Promote pedestrian-oriented, human-scale development in the Central Business District. B: Develop urban spaces that will provide active and passive recreational opportunities for pedestrians and attract residents and visitors to downtown. C: Provide pedestrian-oriented streetscape improvements, including street trees, street furniture, planters and other landscape enhancements, that will create a safe and visually appealing destination for pedestrians. FIVE Goal:Promote high quality development of retail, office and residential uses that support and are supported by public streetscape, transportation, recreation and open space investments. A: Provide development incentives and technical assistance programs that encourage business and property owners to develop projects that are consistent with the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan vision and the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. B: Support the transition of existing nonconforming businesses from downtown to more suitable locations within the City of Tigard. PROJECTS Identified projects in the Plan are divided into six categories: Street Improvements, Streetscape Improvements, Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities Improvements, Parks, Public Spaces and Public Facilities, and Planning and Development Assistance Programs. Transportation projects are intended make downtown Tigard a safe and accessible destination and increase multimodal connectivity within the city center and to other parts of the city. Projects with public elements are proposed to improve neighborhood livability and provide opportunities for a wide range of community and recreational activities. Assistance Programs are designed to facilitate new development, redevelopment and rehabilitation of private property in the URD through support of investments by individual business and property owners in projects that contribute to the economic vitality of downtown Tigard. City Center Advisory Commission 9 Attachment A PROGRESS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN (URP) PROJECTS The CCAC began its review of the URP projects considering the projects completed so far. These include the Jim Griffith Memorial Skatepark, major road improvements, streetscape improvements and a variety of commercial improvements along Main Street. STREET IMPROVEMENTS Hall Blvd/Highway 99W Intersection Improvements Greenburg Road/Highway 99W Intersection Improvement Burnham Street Improvements (Reconstruction and widening) STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Burnham Streetscape Improvements (Addition of landscaping features, street trees, street furniture, stormwater catchment and detainment systems) Main Street Phase I Streetscape Improvements (Addition of landscaping features, street trees, stormwater catchment and detainment systems) BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS Commuter Rail Access (Pedestrian access to Commuter Rail station) PARKS, PUBLIC SPACES,AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Jim Griffith Memorial Skatepark Public Parking Facilities (Design and construction of new 20 space surface lot) PROPERTY ACQUISITION (FROM WILLING SELLERS)AND PROPERTY DISPOSITION Miller\Ferguson and Saxony property purchases The Public Works Yard property disposition for the new Ash\Burham housing development PLANNING AND ASSISTANT PROGRAMS Facade Improvement Projects Café Allegro Pacific Paint CarQuest Rojas Market Diamond Building\Pacific Community Design Sherrie's Jewelry Box Fish-Field Symposium Coffee House JK Interiors Tigard Liquor Store Jeffrey Allen Home Interiors Tigard Main Street Cleaners Max's Fanno Creek Brew Pub Under Water Works Main Street Stamp and Stationery We Li Acupuncture Tenant Improvement Projects Jeffrey Allen Home Interiors Symposium Coffee House City Center Advisory Commission 10 Attachment A URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT ACCOMPLISHMENTS The many completed City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP) projects make Downtown Tigard a more attractive place to visit and to shop, work, and live in. New development infuses energy in downtown Tigard, and attracts other development and new uses. Additionally, new commercial uses in the area contribute to and increase the property tax increment, which can then be used to help fund other projects in the future. A number of businesses have recently established or relocated into the city center: Symposium Coffee House, Jeffery Allen, and Fish-Field are recent arrivals to Main Street, and more businesses are planning to open soon. Progress is also being made on a number of other URP projects that are not yet completed. Two new strolling street projects are in the design and construction phase, study concepts have been presented for the Tigard Street Trail, and plans to restore the Fanno Creek to its original course (the Fanno Creek Remeander Project) and add an "overlook"will complement recent Fanno Creek Trail improvements, such as the new lighted HWY 99W underpass. Other projects not identified specifically in the URP support the city center district too, including the Ash\Burham housing project, completion and installation of Gateway Artwork, park and pathway "way-finding" signage, pre-development work to study the Saxony site and the recently secured $400,000 Environmental Protection Agency Brownfield grant. In addition to city supported projects, there are other downtown developments worthy of note. In particular, the Tigard Downtown Alliance (TDA)formed to support and market businesses within the city center. The TDA has worked with the Tigard Chamber of Commerce to create and leverage social networks through the launch of a new downtown website and Facebook page. The TDA has secured over$50,000 in grants from the Washington County Visitor's Association and Metro to implement projects downtown. A significant number of events, including the Art Walk and the Tigard Street Fair, and new streetscape additions such as benches, bicycle racks and fix-it station, and distinctive hanging glass baskets are TDA projects. The TDA is an important and valuable partner in the revitalization of the city center. City Center Advisory Commission 11 Attachment A POTENTIAL IN THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN PROJECTS A number of City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP) projects are identified in the city's 2015- 2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), including the Fanno Creek Remeander project, Main Street\Green Street Phase II and the Tigard Street Trail (also referred to as the Tigard Heritage Trail and the Rail to Trail project in various city documents). The CCAC supports the continued presence of these URP identified projects on the CIP. On May 13, 2015 the CCAC engaged in an exercise to prioritize partially completed and not-yet- started projects in the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP). Projects currently planned and funded for near-to-mid-term implementation though the CIP mentioned above, were outside the scope of the prioritization exercise. Among the projects considered, the following URP identified projects received the highest support: e) fill-in gaps of Hall Blvd sidewalks, f) plaza(s) development, g) the Tigard Street Trail &Tigard Street on-street bicycle lane, and h) public restrooms. It should be noted that this list is both time and context sensitive. The CCAC supports an opportunistic approach to the city's role in redevelopment of the Urban Renewal District. Projects not yet ripe for development garnered few"votes," however the identification of new resources or opportunities could lead to the reconsideration of projects not currently deemed a priority by the CCAC. NEW INITIATIVES IN THE URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT The CCAC is aware that acquiring land and funding construction of public amenities identified in the plan such as a Plaza, a Performing Arts Center, or structured Public Parking may continue to be a challenge moving forward. In response, the CCAC considered smaller scale projects that may also have a positive impact on the District and will increase activity in the area. Ideas include: • Increased and varied food options ( Kiosks or Carts and Ice cream\frozen yogurt) • Pursuit of scattered small park sites • Provision of privately owned public spaces (also known as POPS) • Encouraging seating alongside buildings • Activating the Electric Street Right-of-way • Focusing on the north end of Main Street • Activating the Tigard Street Trail as-is The Downtown has also been identified by some proponents as a preferred site for a potential new recreational center. As proposed, this would be a city-owned facility and would therefore City Center Advisory Commission 12 Attachment A not be subject to property taxes. It should be noted that such a facility could be an attractive amenity for new residential uses foreseen in the URP, although potential impacts on the property tax increment, transportation facilities, and businesses downtown have yet to be fully explored. FUNDING AND FINANCING Public-Private Partnerships As previously mentioned, property owners and developers play a crucial role in shaping development in the city center. Developers take risks by making investments in time and money in the development process; therefore they develop projects with an expectation of return on their investment. In some case, a project that is desired by the community may not make sense financially for a developer or property owner. Incentives may close the gap and facilitate development that otherwise may not occur. The 2007 Tigard Redevelopment Strategy (the"Leland Report") interviewed developers and suggested the following "carrots"to encourage desired development: land assembly, expedited permitting process , storefront improvement program, fee waivers, tenant subsidy in the form of a loan that converts to a grant if family wage jobs are created, development opportunities study (DOS) program, and seed money for formation of a property trust or similar legal entity as a means to assemble properties, through which downtown property owners can contribute their properties to the trust under agreement with a master developer and share in profits. CCAC reviewed incentives considered by staff to be considered most likely to be utilized by private developers at this time.' These included: 1) code revisions, 2) streamlined permitting, 3)fee subsidies, 4) Land Assembly, 5) Property Tax Abatement (specifically the VHDZ), 6) Public Private Partnerships; and 7) Subsidized Land\Subsidized Loans. A brief explanation of the incentives, as discussed for possible application in the Urban Renewal District by the CCAC is provided below. 1) Code Revisions:changes to the Development Code that reduce barriers to desired development, such as removing story standards from height maximums 2) Streamlining permitting: may refer to either improving overall review times or offering a fee supported expedited review service 3) Waiving or Reducing Development Fees: Fees for Land Use review and Building permits, as well as System Development Charges (SDC)are reimbursed through the use of URA funds. 4) Land Assembly: acquiring two or more adjoining properties and piecing them together to create a redevelopment site for residential or commercial land usage 5) Property Tax Abatement:Tigard has implemented a Vertical Housing Development Zone to provide property tax abatement for a limited duration for multi-unit housing projects ' See Appendix B for additional detailed information on incentives City Center Advisory Commission 13 Attachment A 6) Private- Public Partnerships: Development agreements for publically owned land and the provision of public amenities or coordinating the provision of public Improvements with development 7) Subsidized Land:The sale of publicly-owned land below market value as part of a developer agreement to facilitate desired development; provides enhanced public control over the development process; may include the retention of public ownership, wholly or in part, to provide a revenue stream to offset costs Subsidized Loans: CCDA budget unlikely to have capacity to provide, however the city may be able to secure loans from the state or other sources at preferential terms compared to the private sector The CCAC notes that Tigard has been working on streamlining their development process through the Community Development Efficiencies Initiative. Other incentives (including property tax abatements, private-public partnerships, and land assembly) have been utilized on an ad- hoc basis to further desirable housing projects (The Knoll and Ash\Burnham St). A table showing the benefits and drawbacks of utilizing incentives can be seen in Figure 1. System Development Charge reductions are frequently identified by the development community as desirable. Given the need for infrastructure construction, maintenance, and improvements in the city at this time, waiving fees may not be a practical option. However it should be noted that transit-oriented projects in the city center may qualify for a partial discount from the proposed new Transportation SDC recently adopted by the city. This will facilitate desirable redevelopment and infill in the city center when the development reduces its transportation impacts. Funding Sources for Public Projects Public projects by their nature can be very expensive. While incentives may help fund private projects, funding sources for public projects is often very competitive. Projects need to meet specific criteria and support acknowledged policy objectives. Given the competitive nature of grant funding, staff resources are needed to develop programmatic materials supporting grant applications and successfully secure grants. A number of funding sources for transportation related projects have been identified by staff including Metro, Washington County's Major Streets Transportation Improvement Program, and the Oregon Department of Transportation (Connect Oregon). A review of the Sherwood Cannery project identified a source for public infrastructure improvements, the Business Oregon Infrastructure Finance Authority, which authorized a 20-year, $8.5 million loan for the Sherwood Cannery project. Staff has pursued Metro CET2 Planning Grants successfully to pursue pre- development work. HWY 99W appears to be a Catalyze and Connect identified target area for the Metro TOD Prooram3. 2 Construction Excise Tax levied on new construction within the Urban Growth Boundary 3 Transit Oriented Development City Center Advisory Commission 14 Attachment A Figure 1. Table of Benefits and Drawbacks of Incentives • Code revisions C Land Assembly. )A Subsidized Land 4 open TO it,appy for it e depends on.willing sellers 4 potentially do this e Teak to moderate effect a strong effect e high cost 'r responsive to market e less money to budget for caber e low cost things '4 6 mouth timeline tsn+aat/indir_.:, 'D income is more fungible 4 lS month timeline for all of D.T. ownership control ED redevelopment of previously'parbhc owned property op tax increment O Streamlined permitting 1St IPropertgy Tax Abatement OB Subsidized Loans 4 already can apply online(most 4 using VHDZ 0 costs axe high permits) e moderate to strong effect (D possible to establish ad that can $D save time;time is mores in scant t6 onaaC de* of lend&use income to lend more 4 we're already pinched the lowest time for zitaich tax abatementt.ill e risk hanQina fruit.Further efficiencies be honored 3 complicated regulations may be more difficult. � sh,orc teras increment+ 4 high impact on staff Fee for expediting permits= B long na,ralue+increment e flexible: could be used.for a limited If noffiebal prioritization of D.T. ED flexible:apply abatement to time(stopgap) • costs include additional rit if improvements only vs.whole a criteria could shape usage permits increase property • immediate shows up as cheaper de elopement O Fee subsidies 0 Public?siv*ate Partnership moderate to high impact J► coordir—Ititigpablic improvements Relocation Support � ;'devil meant 4 Mosel;;tied to land assembly moderate to high cost 2*revel* c`p • u'R.D must corer cost 9 high cost 4 currently limited to public land e target desirable development 0 long rmeth a acquasiti�oia e simple,straightforward a Foundation for redevelopment: <>Could be used w,. ivate makes building easier al existing criteria e clearly reduces cost to developer reaulation.s for residential i espec ally with.sneers) applications are complex stria. at e corastracticru is a positi.e,inertia City Center Advisory Commission 15 Attachment A this page intentionally left blank City Center Advisory Commission 16 Attachment A CONCLUSIONS Many communities today are vying to be the more walkable places and Tigard is in competition with its many Metro neighbors to attract development that supports a thriving, walkable Downtown. To be truly competitive, Tigard must be Re-Development Ready. The Urban Land Institute partnered with the state of Minnesota to research Best Practices for Successful Re- Development4 and developed the following list: 1. Establish a vision and clearly articulate development expectations. Embrace collaborative approaches to solve problems, identify and pursue partnerships, manage development risks, improve decision-making skills, and develop clear expectations. 2. Foster collaborative and integrated strategies. 3. Analyze and modify land use regulations to allow a compact mix of uses and increased flexibility reflecting changing market demands and national trends. 4. Shift project review and approvals from reactive to proactive. 5. Provide transparency that clearly defines the development process. 6. Provide existing due diligence information to developers upfront to increase efficiency and reduce development time and cost. 7. Work as a team to coordinate approval process across all agencies and departments (planning, public works, parks, etc.), elected offices, and investment partners (Metropolitan Council, county, state, watershed districts, schools). 8. Determine how redevelopment of opportunity areas or sites supports job growth, increases tax revenues, enhances local services, creates key amenities, supports a full range of housing options, and contributes to the creation of markets not currently available. The vision of a thriving Downtown articulated more than a decade ago still resonates today. The city's Strategic Plan vision for a walkable community for all ages and abilities is most likely to be implemented in the city center where there are a variety of destinations to visit, where transit options are available and accessible, and where the street design is interconnected and interesting for pedestrians. There are many things the city is doing, and doing well, to promote the goals and objectives of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP). City leadership and staff have responded to opportunities as they rise. They have also been proactive in seeking partners for development projects in both the private and public sector. Much has been accomplished in the first ten years of the Urban Renewal District. There are some specific steps that can be taken now to further implementation of the Renewal Plan in the second decade to build on today's accomplishments. The following recommendations are presented for the consideration of the City Center Development Agency. 4 View online at:http://minnesota.uli.org/wp-contentluploads/sites/31/2012/04/Reinvesting-in-the-Region-Re- Development-Ready-Guide-June-2013.pdf City Center Advisory Commission 17 Attachment A RECOMMENDATIONS Develop a City Wide Infill Development Policy Adopted plans for both the existing Urban Renewal District and the Tigard Triangle area call for intense redevelopment. Developing a city-wide policy on infill and redevelopment would establish a vision, clearly articulate development expectations, and improve decision-making skills. Identifying available incentive programs in policy would also provide transparency and increase the attractiveness of redevelopment in Tigard. The first step would be to identify the incentives that will be most beneficial to meet redevelopment goals and adopt qualifying standards for incentives. Identify Funding Sources and Apply for Grants The priority projects identified fulfill a number of acknowledged policy objectives incorporated in the Comprehensive Plan, the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan, the City Center Urban Renewal Plan and the Strategic Plan. Direct staff to consider funding sources identified in this report(Metro TOD and Oregon Infrastructure Finance Authority) and others to fund the following CCAC prioritized projects: a) fill-in gaps of Hall Blvd sidewalks, b) plaza(s) development, c) the Tigard Street Trail &Tigard Street on-street bicycle lane, and d) public restrooms. Incorporate URP Identified Projects into Other Projects Consider how to incorporate URP identified projects into existing or proposed projects in the downtown. Examples could include providing public restrooms in the Tigard Street trail or other park facility or improvements downtown, or if a city-owned recreation facility is sited downtown, public restrooms and structured public parking could be integrated into the design. Introduce a fee for Expedited Permitting Downtown projects are often high-profile and pressure to complete the permitting process as quickly as possible can be applied by various parties. If downtown projects are expected to be expedited through the review process, introducing a fee for expedited permitting to recoup costs associated with staff expediting permitting specific types of projects would assign a monetary value to that process and provide a pathway for those who desire a quicker process and are willing to pay for it. Bancroft Loans or Installation Payments As mentioned in the public-private subsection of the funding and financing section of this report, finding ways to make System Development Charges more manageable is always desirable from the private sector's view, while the public sector struggles to maintain and improve existing facilities in addition to ensuring the adequacy of new facilities.Waiving or reducing fees outright is not always feasible; however for some infrastructure systems, such as sewer installation, financing by the property owner, which allows for installation payments, is quite common (see Appendix C for further details on Bancroft Loans). Washington County also uses the Bancroft City Center Advisory Commission 18 Attachment A Bonding Act (pursuant to ORS 223.205 through 223.785)to authorize installment payments of the Transportation Development Tax. It may be possible for some of the fees and SDCs collected by the city of Tigard to qualify for similar installation payments. Evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of offering such financing would provide informative data to consider whether offering installation payment programs in the future has potential. Amend the City Center Urban Renewal Plan (URP) to increase the time period and addlmodify projects Given the impact of the 2008 recession on property values (and therefore the increment), and the city's bonding capacity, the remaining ten years for the URD may not be enough time to complete all of the projects identified in the URP. In addition, some projects may need to be modified to respond to changing conditions and opportunities. For example, a variety of small parks and plazas connected thematically and though way-finding signage may end up being more feasible to provide than a large scale plaza envisioned in the URP and the Fanno Creek Park Plan. In addition, while some type of community public facility in the Downtown remains desirable, it is unclear whether separate Public Performing Arts Center and Public Market or a more general art or community center that offers a variety of amenities might better meet current needs. Reassessing the need for URP public facilities should be included in the upcoming Facilities Planning for the city. City Center Advisory Commission 19 Attachment A REFERENCES Metro. (2007). Development Toolkit for Financial Incentives: Community Investment Toolkit Volume 1. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from Metro: http:/lwww.oregonmetro.gov/sites/default/files/financial_incentives_toolkit final.pdf Metro. (Strategic Plan 2011). Tranist Oriented Development Program Executive Summary. Retrieved 28 2015, September, from Metro: http://www.oregonmetro.gov/sites/default/files/tod_strat plan_execsum.pdf Oregon State Legislature. (2013 Edition). ORS Chapter 457: Urban Renewal. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from Oregon State Legislature: https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/lawsstatutes/2013ors457.html Parametrix. (2007). Downtown Improvement Plan. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from http://www.tigard-or.gov/document_center/CommunityDevelopment/tdip.pdf Tashman Johnson, LLC; Casacade Economic Planning; SERA Planning; Urban Land Economics; Jeanette Launer,Attorney. (2005). City Center Urban Renewal Plan. Retrieved from City of Tigard: http://www.tigard- or.gov/document_center/Commu nityDevelopment/urban_renewal_plan.pdf City Center Advisory Commission 20 Attachment A APPENDICES APPENDIX A-GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND USEFUL DEFINITIONS APPENDIX B- URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT MAP APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH City Center Advisory Commission 21 Attachment A APPENDIX A-GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND USEFUL DEFINITIONS CCAC: City Center Advisory Commission. The CCAC is an advisory citizen committee charged with advising the Board of the City Center Development Agency on policy related to the Urban Renewal District and implementing the City Center Urban Renewal Plan. CCDA: City Center Development Agency. The CCDA fulfills the statutory requirement to have an urban renewal commission governing an Urban Renewal District. Currently the CCDA Board is comprised of the Mayor and City Councilors. CIP: Capital Improvement Plan. The CIP is produced every fiscal year and projects capital needs (defined as projects costing more than $50,000 and\or public facilities, including streets)for 5 years of projects. SDC: System Development Charge. SDCs are collected to finance expansions of existing infrastructure, such as roads, schools and sewer for development. TIF: Tax Increment Funds or Tax Increment Financing: revenue generated from property taxes that is in excess of the property tax collected at the time an Urban Renewal District is initiated (the base). Also referred to as "the increment" since it is the revenue that is collected above and beyond the base property tax value. TDIP: Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan. URP: City Center Urban Renewal Plan, adopted plan that identifies goals and objectives for the Urban Renewal District (URD) and investments within the URD. URA: Urban Renewal Area, see URD below. URD: Urban Renewal District. The identified Urban Renewal District located in the city center. See map, Appendix C. City Center Advisory Commission 22 Attachment A APPENDIX B- URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT MAP `iii C. qt \ , ...,..,„,z.z,...:,.. A, -. V ■ 1, 's4\44'44"-\\\\‘ ,,,. 'r 4 • '\\I T<AJI Aisu:173.71 av191 • 1.340 Alar] 144 i 4 Qtft.1 _ \ Iola!Rlr.<.':$9C9.;: 720 ® .' rc V(:prr(itr nr.4•-irswcr'Flip ©.i,,-„,a,.t...-,i1rw„,+Utikir': '..,.;i;a !!p,}33 1 RR�� a kr s n::.r.it.) RNA)L Cr;it'll 11”rM 0":....,Nar.Irxiii FSn sad llrtrn n:Pa gawal h°aa !In * ON HO. City Center Advisory Commission 23 Attachment A APPENDIX C- DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH This appendix is a synthesis of the materials prepared for CCAC discussions regarding Development Incentives. The implementation of four incentives was identified for further research: Fee Subsidies, Property Tax Abatement, Subsidized Land, and Public-Private Partnerships. The first part of this document provides general information regarding the development process, and possible criteria for evaluating development incentives; the second part of this document provides more specific information regarding implementation each of the incentives, as well as Case Studies from other jurisdictions. Note that while Case Studies to illustrate how similar policies have been implemented have been included, development projects and costs vary considerably by site. Metro's Development Toolkit for Financial Incentives5 was a resource for preparing this summary regarding the development process and how specific policy options might affect the Urban Renewal District and budget. I. Introduction General Information about the Development Process Developers make investments in time and money in the process (a risk)and develop projects with an expectation of return on their investment. Construction (hard) costs typically account for approximately two-thirds of a project costs. The remaining one-third is "soft costs" such as consultant fees for design and technical tasks and permitting costs. When public improvements are required costs for both soft and hard costs are increased. The development process typically requires more time on the front end preparing detailed plans of how a project will develop than the construction takes. It is not unusual for two-thirds or three- quarters of the development process to happen before a project breaks ground. Land use review to evaluate the appropriateness of the use occurs first. Next, the site is prepared and streets and utilities are constructed and prepared. Then structures are built. In some case, a project that is desired by the community may not make sense financially. Incentives may close the gap and facilitate development that may otherwise not occur. Information was gathered on regarding four possible Development Incentives: Fee Subsidies, Property Tax Abatement, Subsidized Land, and Public-Private Partnerships. Criteria A list of Possible Criteria was generated for discussion regarding: a) how specific policy options might affect the Urban Renewal District; and b) how projects applying for incentives may be evaluated. At the time of discussion it is expected that additional criteria not already identified may be discussed. Possible Criteria for Reviewing Incentive Policy How do costs of policy compare to amount of leveraged private investment? 5 In electronic versions of this report underlined text contain embedded hyper-links to original references 6 Personal communication with Portland Parks and Recreation project manager,Sandra Burtzos City Center Advisory Commission 24 Attachment A APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH Will policy lead to increased Tax Increment revenue in the long term? Can costs of policy be controlled? Does policy target specific desired types of development for the URA? Is control of quality of design/outcome enhanced through use of policy? Possible Criteria for Application of Incentive to Specific Projects Will project meet URA Plan goals and objectives? Will project meet Strategic Plan goals? Is proposed development for new use or improvement (i.e. not simply needed maintenance)? Is development expected to have catalyst impact on URA/potential to enhance Downtown as a whole? II. Incentive Policies and Impact Tables Waiving or Reducing Fees Fees associated with development include those for Land Use review and Building permits, System Development Charges, and taxes. Fee amounts are project specific. The specific policy under consideration is to reimburse developers for fees paid through the use of URA funds Regulating, Reviewing and Permitting Development Development can have both positive and negative impacts. Development is regulated at the local level to comply with state and federal requirements, to mitigate and control negative impacts of development on nearby existing uses and public infrastructure, ensure safe construction of structures and roadways, and to promote desirable development. Based on the assumption that"development should pay for itself," most permitting jurisdictions regulating development fund costs associated with permitting and reviewing development through fees collected for services, rather than general budget funds. These fees are set through the public budget process and adopted by local authorities. Typically, permitting and review fees are based on the cost of administering permits and providing services for review and inspection, and are therefore calculated based on project-specific features, such as the value of the project, the number of units, amount of square-footage, number of electrical or plumbing devices, etc. Tigard has been working on streamlining their development process through the Community Development Efficiencies Initiative, future sample proiects include: Planning Department Cost of Service Study, Electronic Building Division Document Review, and Standardizing Procedures for multiple residential review submittals. System Development Charges and Utility Connection Fees System Development Charges (or SDCs) are fees assessed to new development to access and use existing public systems such as roadways, schools and parks. Oregon Statute (ORS 223.297 to 223.314)guides how SDCs are calculated, administered and amended. Utility systems such as public water, sewer and the electric grid charge "hook-up"fees to connect to existing systems City Center Advisory Commission 25 Attachment A APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH In addition to the fees for Land Use review and Building permits and SDCs for parks, schools, and transportation; Tigard also collects Clean Water Service and water service fees, and the Metro Construction Excise Tax. Waiving or Reducing Development Fees A 2013 League of Oregon Cities survey found that 39% of respondents reported some type of adjustment of SDCs to encourage development. The most common was a reduction, followed by phased or delayed payments. The survey comments indicated that jurisdictions target reductions for specific types of development (for example affordable housing or commercial uses that provide a guaranteed amount of jobs) and may consist of partial reductions. Phased payments are also a common strategy. When a connection charge imposed by a local government is greater than the amount necessary to reimburse the local government for its costs of inspection and installing connections with system mains, installment payments are required to be available. The Bancroft Bonding Act (pursuant to ORS 223.205 through 223.785) is also used to authorize installment payments of the Transportation Development Tax in Washington County. When SDC or utility hook-up fees are waived or reduced below the cost of providing service, entities may respond by increasing user fees to off-set costs and maintain service levels. Brookings offers a program that pays the difference in sewer System Development Charges (SDC) between a general commercial use and a restaurant use for existing properties in the Urban Renewal District for new start-ups, paid for by the redevelopment agency. Tigard could explore a targeted reimbursement program to facilitate desired development. Reimbursements can be limited to a set amount and/or cover differences between use types. Reimbursing developers for a portion of assessed SDCs or fees will have immediate costs and will need a funding mechanism. Reimbursements could be limited to specific function under conditions, for example reimbursing a portion of the Parks SDC when development is located within 1/4 mile of existing park. When reimbursement facilitates development that would otherwise not occur, the future generated TIF revenue can be a source of repayment. Benefits Drawbacks Reduces upfront developer costs Funding mechanism needed Target Desirable Development Immediate Impact on URA budget Various Options regarding Implementation Costs can be limited to set amount If in form of grant or loan- authorized by URA Plan Property Tax Abatement Most tax abatement programs target specific types or classifications of property for partial abatement for a specific time period. A number of abatement programs currently operate within Tigard and any qualifying projects may request abatement. A clear and compelling public City Center Advisory Commission 26 Attachment A APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH benefit for property tax abatement for a specific project outside existing programs may deserve consider by decision makers as long as the fiduciary impacts are well understood. Ad Valorem Real Property Taxes A property tax (or millage tax) is a levy on real property that the owner is required to pay. Real property (also called real estate or realty) means the combination of land and improvements to land (immovable man-made objects, such as buildings). Real property is taxed based on its classification. Classification is the grouping of properties based on similar use. Properties in different classes are taxed at different rates. Examples of different classes of property are residential, commercial, industrial and vacant real property. Tigard's permanent property tax rate of$2.5131 per thousand (as of 2012) is applied to the assessed value (AV) of property in the city each year. This permanent tax rate produces revenues to support General Fund operating costs such as Police, Library and Parks, and made up 13% of Tigard's budgeted 2014-15 revenue. Bonds and levys collected through the assessment of property taxes are dedicated to specific activities (i.g. the city's Parks Bond, Tigard-Tualatin School District Levy, and the Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue levy). For many existing property tax abatement programs, enabling legislation is adopted by the state Legislature and then cities/counties adopt by ordinance. Existing Programs for Property Tax Abatement For Commercial Uses Strategic Investment Program (SIP) Property Tax Abatement Oregon's Strategic Investment Program exempts a portion of very large capital investments (in excess of$25- $100 million in urban areas)from property taxes for 15 years. The program is available statewide. Enterprise Zones Projects locating in the designated Enterprise Zones are eligible to receive a three year, 100% property tax abatement that create jobs with salaries at or above 150% of the average county wage. Requires sponsoring jurisdiction. Tigard has recently adopted an Enterprise Zone, however only a very small portion of the URD is located within the Enterprise Zone. • See also City of Beaverton enterprise zone For Historic Properties Federal Tax Credit and Special Assessment The Oregon State Historic Preservation Office currently has two tax incentive programs to encourage the appropriate rehabilitation and maintenance of historic properties, limited to properties that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The Federal Tax Credit program is for income-producing buildings only(commercial and residential rental). It saves the property owner 20 percent of the cost of rehabilitation through a federal income tax credit. Oregon's Special Assessment of Historic Properties program offers a 10-year"freeze" of a property's assessed value for buildings that will be significantly but appropriately rehabilitated and maintained. Applications are accepted year-round. For Housing Vertical Housing Development Zone City Center Advisory Commission 27 Attachment A APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH The state enabled partial property tax exemption (of 20%) applies to new construction on the first four floors of residential development built above a non-residential ground floor for in a "zone" designated by local authority. The maximum tax exemption on the new construction is 80% per year over the first ten years of the project. The Oregon Housing and Community Services Division has prepared an Excel workbook for calculating site specific benefits. A key component of the program is the commercial uses on the ground floor, projects with limited non- residential ground floor use will receive little benefit. Tigard adopted this zone in 2014.One project in the Tigard Triangle has applied for the exemption and the Burnham and Ash project will also apply. • The North Main multi-family housing in downtown Milwaukie Property Tax Exemption for Affordable Housing The Oregon legislature has authorized cities and counties to create tax exemption programs, Multi Unit Housing Tax Exemption (formerly the Transit Orientated Tax Exemption), cities/counties adopt by ordinance. • Portland Limited Tax Exemption Programs • Crossings at Gresham Station • Beaverton adopted ordinance implement for two year"test" period • Washington County Multiunit Rental Housing Special Assessment available depending on financing Implementing Property Tax Abatement for Multiple Unit Housing Oregon cities typically utilize a state sanctioned property tax abatement program. Tigard has implemented the VHDZ, while other tax abatement programs for housing typically target affordable housing projects and are available to all qualifying applicants. A clear and compelling public benefit for property tax abatement outside existing programs for a specific project may deserve consider by decision makers as long as the fiduciary impacts are well understood. Benefits Drawbacks 1 Targets Desirable Development Decrease in TIF revenue in short term (depends on length of abatement) Long term increase in increment Aside from VHDZ no existing programs for Market Rate Multi-Unit programs exist Existing programs for VHDZ VHDZ limited to development with ground floor non-residential use Reduces development overall costs Land Assembly and Subsidized Land Larger properties are typically more attractive to developers. More area allows for a greater range of uses and increases project financing. In addition, larger parcels facilitate the construction of new streets by allowing more options for the street connections to be integrated into the site plan. The sale of publicly-owned land below market value (or"subsidized land") City Center Advisory Commission 28 Attachment A APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH may occur as part of a developer agreement to facilitate desired development and provides enhanced public control over the development process. Examples below include the partial retention of public ownership, which may provide a revenue stream. Land Subsidies The sale of publicly-owned land below market value (or"subsidized land") may occur as part of a developer agreement to facilitate desired development and may enhance control over development outcomes. Publically owned land is exempt from property tax assessment and does not generate TIF revenue. Sales of publically owned land in the URA generates revenue, and when sold for redevelopment, will generate TIF revenue. Publically Owned Land and Land Assembly Local governments own and purchase land for a number of reasons. Land may support current or future public uses or may be held for the purposes of land assembly. Acquiring two or more adjoining properties and piecing them together in some fashion to create a development can be done for residential or commercial land usage, depending on the purpose. Land assemblage is a common activity by Urban Renewal entities. The process might take place over a period of months or years and as a result, can be quite costly and is an investment over the long term. Eugene Broadway Place Broadway Place Summary: The Eugene Urban Renewal Agency(URA) assembled the two half-blocks that were used to develop the Broadway Place mixed-use project. URA funds in the amount of$2.6 million were contributed to the parking structure construction costs. The City sold development rights for housing to be constructed on top of the parking structures. Outcome: The Broadway Place mixed-use project includes 170 apartment units, ground floor commercial space, and 740 structured parking spaces. It has become a major anchor for the west end of downtown and a popular residential destination with very low vacancy rates. The Broadway Place development received the 1999 Governor's Livability Award. Lake View Village • 100K sq ft mixed retail and office w/i six commercial buildings. • 366 parking spaces on four levels (two are public) • City retained ownership of parking lot • LORA: $4.6 M for the garage ($.3 M funded w/ bonds) • Gramor and Tenants: Approximately$27-28 M • Properties assemble 1989 to 1996 • RFP in 1996—Development agreement in 2001 • Constructed in 2002 This block is bounded by State Street, "A"Avenue, First Street and Union Pacific railroad tracks. The project was initiated by the Lake Oswego Renewal Agency (LORA)through a process that included land acquisition, partial resale to a private developer, a binding development agreement, and public assistance to construct the parking structure. The parking structure remains in public ownership. The development agreement defines areas of private and public parking, and it requires the project developer to maintain the public parking structure. City Center Advisory Commission 29 Attachment A APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH Construction was completed in November of 2003. The commercial buildings are privately owned. The ground floors are exclusively retail or restaurant uses, and the upper floors are predominantly offices. The retail spaces are accessed from the sidewalks, unlike a mall with interior access. This creates active sidewalks and public spaces, promoting an enjoyable pedestrian experience. Benefits Drawbacks Retain public control of development Land costs Development likely to increase TIF revenue Possible increased street circulation Supports URA Plan Goal 5 Public-Private Partnerships The specific policy under consideration is the public provision of facility improvements with development. Facility improvements typically required for new development include streets, sanitary sewer and storm drainage and water utilities. Projects identified in the Tigard Conceptual Connectivity Plan and Transportation System Plan could be providing through the expenditure of both public and private resources directly through the construction process or indirectly through a credit system. Coordinating Public Improvements with Development Required improvements include streets, sanitary sewer and storm drainage and water utilities Land Use Review identifies required street improvements/construction when redevelopment occurs. Local street construction and utility improvements can be quite costly. Incentives to a developer could offset the costs of the dedication of ROW and constructing street improvements. Urban renewal funded low-interest loans or direct subsidy of developments that include the desired street improvements. The use of public-private partnerships (P3s) in the development of transportation improvements have increased but are not standard practice. Considerations include setting precedent for future development and proportionality'. Tigard Street Connectivity Plan The Downtown Tigard Conceptual Connectivity Plan identifies desired connections to be implemented with new development over the next 50 years. It establishes desired basic system characteristics of circulation, connectivity, and capacity. The Downtown Conceptual Connectivity Plan Implementation Map classifies roads as various types and identifies proposed new streets. Tiaard Transportation Plan Tigard 2035 Transportation System Plan In December 2010, the Tigard City Council adopted the 2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP) that links expected growth with transportation needs. The 2035 TSP sets the policy framework for the city's transportation system. It includes a list of strategies and projects that will guide future investments. Transportation funds are limited and highly competitive for large expensive 'Proportionality references to the practices of exactions,when a condition for development is imposed on a parcel of land that requires the developer to mitigate anticipated negative impacts of the development.The exaction should be proportional to the impact.Street improvements,such as requiring construction of a new street may or may not be proportional to the impact of the development on the transportation system. City Center Advisory Commission 30 Attachment A APPENDIX C-DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES BACKGROUND RESEARCH projects. For this reason, a major theme of the 2035 TSP update is the need to make the most out of the existing transportation system. See LORA examples for street improvements htto://www.ci.osweao.or.us/lora/avenue htto://www.ci.oswego.or.us/lora/first-street-phase-i http://www.ci.oswego.or.us/lora/2nd-street-and-b-avenue-0 City of San Antonio adopted Public-Private Partnership (P3) Guidelines in accordance with the Texas Legislature enacting the Public and Private Facilities and Infrastructure Act of 2011 under Chapter 2267 of the Texas Government Code. The P3 Guidelines are an additional tool for developing qualified capital improvement projects, using the Design-Build contract method. Under said guidelines, the City and a private entity (comprised of a single operator or a team) enter into a contractual agreement where the skills and assets of each sector(public and private) are shared in delivering a service or facility. Benefits Drawbacks Can be included in developer agreement and Cost reduce upfront developer costs Can serve to catalyze additional development Setting precedent Possible increased street circulation May take time to develop mechanism and/or improvement eligibility criteria Meets URA Plan Goals 3 &4 Street Improvements may be identified in URA Plan May address concerns/perceptions regarding proportionality City Center Advisory Commission 31 Carol Krager From: noreply@revize.com Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 12:22 PM To: Carol Krager Cc: Caroline Patton Subject: Public Comments Attachments: TCAC Itr of support Substantial Amendment 020821.pdf Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Block sender Name= Ryan Ruggiero EmailAddress= Address= 12075 SW Lincoln Ave,Tigard, OR 97223 Topic= Item 4-Substantial Amendment Yes, I support=Yes FeedBackText= Please see the attached. Client IP= 198.236.86.3 1 February 8, 2021 Mayor Snider and the Tigard City Council, The Tigard Town Center Advisory Commission ("TCAC")is the volunteer advisory body charged with advising the Town Center Development Agency on matters relating to the two urban renewal districts located within the City of Tigard.The purpose of this letter is to reiterate the TCAC's support for and recommendation of the substantial amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan and the associated increase in the maximum indebtedness. The maximum indebtedness authorized by the downtown district's 2005 urban renewal plan is currently set at$22 million. In retrospect,that sum seems quite modest, in view of the greatly increased cost of significant public improvements.At the time,there was understandable concern on the part of City Council about the receptiveness of the Tigard electorate to creation of an urban renewal district. Fortunately,the public embraced the concept, as indicated by the 67 percent vote in favor of creating a second district in the Tigard Triangle in 2017. As events unfolded,the timing of the downtown district was less than ideal. It was rolled out on the eve of the Great Recession,which undercut property values on which urban renewal tax increment financing depends. Until the economy recovered,the downtown district lacked the funding to take on major projects. It's too early to assess the impact of the current pandemic-driven downturn; it is safe to say that new business investment has slowed, at least temporarily. But projects also continue to move forward,which is very encouraging,and we have much to be proud of already.Among its most noteworthy accomplishments to date: • Main and Burnham streetscape improvements •Attwell off Main mixed-use development •Tigard Heritage Trail and Rotary Plaza • Urban Renewal Matching Grant Program Many additional projects are now in the planning and design phase,and going forward, we want to dream a little bigger. Along with enhancing the downtown area's attractiveness and livability,these projects have helped increased its assessed property tax base by 64 percent,compared to a 56 percent increase citywide between 2006 and 2019.The City of Tigard and the other taxing districts,will ultimately benefit from that appreciation.There is a "life cycle"to an urban renewal district. In more normal times,Tigard's City Center district might be expected to have reached maturity by its fifteenth year.These have not been normal times. In our view,the district is still gathering momentum. Its best years are still ahead of us. The Town Center Advisory Commission believes that the additional investment in Tigard's downtown will serve the City's financial interests as well as our shared vision for Downtown Tigard. Very truly yours, Ryan C. Ruggiero Chair,Town Center Advisory Commission Carol Krager From: Harold Warner < Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 5:16 PM To: Sean Farrelly Subject: re city councel public hearing for proposed city center urban renewal Importance: High Warning!This message was sent from outside your organization and we are unable to Allow sender I Block sender verify the sender. We have live in Tigard since 1983 or early 1984, after we were married We lived North of Bull MTN, when we purchased our first an only home in 1993 I may not state this with precision, because all I have is flier that discusses this meeting tonight 2/9 , on Urban Renewal I would vote against, because it is poor timing, and you may add this to some kind of record : With the uncertainty of covid-19 and where we will be in near future, the increasing variants especially the newer ones from Africa, the uncertain of vaccine distributions, people not fully back to work and school, hit on job losses, uncertainty of the future, then: to me this is NOT the time to consider any form of expenditures for anything other than BASIC maintaining of needed services, and stability of government, even with stated no taxes increases. I just think this is ill-timed, and needs to be tabled an reviewed maybe in two years. I even think creating public spaces etc is not the right time. It seems to me we need to really use those monies for things that really need attention: better cross walk controls with changed signage to the flashing back ground greenish, like we see at schools: you can visualize them better Do you realized we have no cross walk signage on S.W. 135th? We might need to create speed bumps or something as motorcycles have been known to speed the full length of that street at high rates *\0,"`R'F4,p* Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard x For January 2021 1 'NRIi Jcs 2020 Population Estimate 55,514 (Adopted Budget FY 2020-21) �`.C>•*laily�.�� Crime Snapshot ---#P----mmin Selected Group A Offenses Jan-2C Jan-21 I %Chg 2020 YTD 2021 YTD %Chg Person Crime 42 40 9 -4.76% 42 40 qp -4 .76% Assault 32 31 • -3.13% 32 31 • -3.13% Robbery 4 1 0 -75.00% 4 1 -75.00% Property Crime 162 173 0 6.79% 162 17 6.79% Burglary-Residential 2 7 0 250.00% 2 7 0 250.00% Burglary-Business 10 4 5 -60.00% 10 4 0 -60.00% Burglary-Other 1 3 0 200.00% 1 3 0 200.00% UUMV 3 11 0 266.67% 3 11 0 266.67% Theft 96 85 0 -11.46% 96 85 a -11.46% Vandalism 22 32 5 45.45% 22 32 0 45.45% Societal Crimes 56 41 -19.64% 56 45 1p -19 .64% DLIII 11 4 -63.64% 11 4• -63.64% Drug Offense 9 3 5 -66.67% 9 3 0 -66.67% Disorderly Conduct 8 4 lb -50.00% 8 4 -50.00% Arrests(*CTA in Total) 106 37. -65.09%1 106 37 -65.09% Felony 15 7 5 -53.33% 15 7 -53.33% MISD 44 6 0 -86.36% 44 6 0 -86.36% Warrants 47 24 0 -48.94% 47 24• -48.94% Calls for Service Jan-20 Jan-21 1 %Chg 2020 YTD 2021 YTD %Chg Dispatched Calls 1667 1707 0 2.40% 1667 1707 0 2.40% Self Initiated Calls 1457 1034• -29.03% 1457 1034 0 -29.03% Online Crime Reports n/a 33 n/a n/a 33 n/a Response Time Jan-20 Jan-21 i %Chg 2020 YTD 2021 YTD %Chg Priority 1 &2 6.4 5.57 0 -12.97% 6.4 5.57 0 -12.97% Priority 3 9.2 9.62 5 4.57% 9.2 9.62 0 4.57% Priority 4+ 11 9.93 5 -9.73% 11 9.93 9 -9.73% Photo Enforcement''' Red Light- Began Issuing 03/11/20 Month of: Jan 2021 YTD 2020 I 2021 Yr to Yr Received Issued Rejected Issued Issued %Chg 99W/SW Hall Blvd 169 135 34 n/a 135 N/A 99W/SW 72nd Ave 122 93 29 n/a 93 N/A 99W/SW Durham Rd 32 22 10 n/a 22 N/A Intersection Speed - Began Issuing 7/14/20 Month of: Jan 2021 YTD 2020 2021 Yr to Yr Received Issued Rejected Issued Issued %Chg 99W/SW Hall Blvd 150 1381 12 n/a 138 N/A 99W/SW 72nd Ave 1535 1393 142 n/a 1393 N/A • *Person Crime-Assault(verbal harassment,menacing,simple and felony assault),Homicide,Robbery,Kidnap,Forcible/Non-Forcible Sex Offense *Property Crimes-Arson,Bribery,Res Burglary,Bus Burglary,Oth Burglary,Forgery,Vandalism,Embezzle,Fraud,Theft,UUMV,Bad Check *Societal Crimes-Drug Offense,Prostitution,Weapons,Curfew,DisCon,DUII,Family Offense,Liqour Laws,Peeping Tom,Trespass *The data is National Incident Based Reporting System(NIBRS)compliant and not Uniform Crime Report(UCR)compliant iand cannot be compared to any report using that standard.For more info on NIBRS:https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/ucr/nibrs 1 ,,,,„.?,vexSft'r'* r Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard qti VOLICE For January 2021 H �` T"+�IGorn 2020 Population Estimate 55,514 (Adopted Budget FY 2020-21) reE *1't ne ` Employee Snapshot Department Staffing Information Actual Budget %Budget Sworn 69.0 79.0 87% Non-Sworn 16.0 18.0 89% Total Number of Personnel 85.0 97.0 88% Patrol Staffing Authorized 37 1:3 Swings Graves Overall% #of Shifts Conducted at Minimums 1 3% 16 52% 15 48% 34% Personnel Unavailable for Work Patrol All Other Overall #of Recruits in Pre-Academy - #of Recruits in Academy 3 3 #of Recruits in Recruit Training 3 3 #of Personnel on Extended Sick Leave/FMLA 1 1 #of Personnel on Military Leave 1 1 #of Personnel on Modified Duty* 4 4 #of Personnel on Administrative Leave 4 4 Total Personnel Unavailable to Work during some Period during the Month 15 15 Total Officers Available to work PATROL some period during the Month 22 , *Modified Duty=any modified work schedule to accommodate light duty,workers comp,Covid related EOC-S or EOC-F. Operational Effectiveness Snapshot --I Budget Information is based on the best available data. FY 2019-2020 Budget FY 2020-21 Budget Percent YTD Status Percent YTD Status Department Budget Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Administrative 55% 58% • -3% 58% 58%• 0% Operations 50% 58% • -9% 50% 58%• -8% Services 57% 58%• -1% 52% 58% • -7% Total Department Budget 52% 58% -6% 51% 58% • -7% Budget Information is based on the best available data. FY 2019-2020 FY 2020-21 Percent YTD B to g et Percent YTD B t est Department Overtime Actual Budgeted Actual Budgeted Administrative 44% 58%• -14% 23% 58%• -36% Operations 41% 58%• -17% 32% 58% • -26% Services 38% 58%• -20% 27% 58% • -32% Total Overtime 40% 58%• -18% 31% 58% . -28% I 2 I (,,,Y- 1' xslfn Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard For January 2021 . 1( i 111..,c, , -,-,,,\ .,„ ,�, 2020 Population Estimate 55,514 (Adopted Budget FY 2020-21) Levy Status Update Jan-21 Jan-21 2021 YTD 2021 YTD Training Officers Hours Officers* Hours Advanced Crisis Intervention and De-escalation Training 0 0 2 36 Crisis Intervention 0 0 68 51 De-escalation Training 0 0 92 169.5 *YTD Officer totals may duplicate officer count as training happens muliple times ayear Totals 0 0 162 256.5 Levy Staffing Information-YEAR to date progress Hires Budget %Budget Sworn-Patrol(priority hire) 6.0 8.0 75% Sworn-SRO (targeted 2021-22 school year) 0.0 1.0 0% Non-Sworn 0_0 2_0 0% Total Number of Personnel 6.0 11.0 55% Levy Hiring Process-Month of December Patrol All Other Overall Patrol All Other Overall Jan-21 Jan-21 Jan-21 Levy to Date Levy to DatcLevy to Dat Interviews 9 12 21.00 91 12 103.00 ORPAT(physical fitness test) 0 0 - 7 0 7.00 Background investigations 5 0 5.00 39 0 39.00 Conditional Offers of employment 0 0 - 16 0 16.00 Hires 1 0 1.00 11 0 11.00 November Emergency Response Times - 6 Year Trend1111 PRIORITY 1 AND 2 Priority 1 calls = 6.4 Imminent threat to life 6.23-6.23-6.23 / 6.03 I \ i 5.57 Priority 2 calls=Immediate threat to life,occuring now 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 202 District integrity (5 police districts) #of Shifts conducted with 5 or more patrol Days Swings Graves Overall% officers 20 65% 15 48% 8 26% 46% de Community Snapshot i Community Outreach and Events Media Outreach Upcoming Events *ID Theft presenation-United Methodist Church(1/12) *Media inquiry topics: OIS,riot,speed reduction, *Unite Oregon Community Mtg(2/4) *Neighborhood Watch(1/13) *CPO 4B meeting(1/14) sex assault,homicide *K9 presentation Alberta Rider(2/4) *CPO 4M meeting(1/27) *PSAB(1/11&1/25) *Press releases:7 *Word is Bond youth leader presentations at *Operation Hope-winter supply bags for houseless -Officer Involved Shooting(3) -Riot(2) shift breifings(2/24;2/25;3/3) community funded by Resiliency Funds -Homicide -DUII HVE results *PSAB meetings bi-monthly 3 *\-- s1ir� Tigard PD Strategic Dashboard i R tz ..'r y For January 2021 a. 1 lim, 4 2020 Population Estimate 55,514 (Adopted Budget FY 2020-21) Flt't-, *TSiAM4° Calls For Service - By Month: 7 Year Trend JANUARY DISPATCHED JANUARY SELF INITIATED . 1606' 1792 1797 1667- 1707 1943 1403 ' 1483 ' , f I I 1654� 1450— ` 1457 I ; i 1377 I 1377" I 1034 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 115 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 1111111111.1.1111111* ... Tracking Code Cases -Year to Date 1111UPIP' 111411 1111111.11111 di 06.414. 2018 W.ii�',A W %Lta _" . Overdose 0 6 2 3 2 Mental Health hold (POH) 10 25 14 13 7 Suicide 0 1 1 0 0 I , - - , , ; • Attempted Suicide 5 14 4 4 4 cases of allegations DHS Referral 35 45 54 37 37 of abuse to an Domestic Violence (DV) 7 12 17 15 11 elderly or mentally DV No Crime 8 8 16 11 10 challenged victim end up in the Organized Retail Crime (ORC) Theft 2 7 4 5 2 caseload of Graffiti 9 37 2 10 13 Detectives and SRO's. BHI -Transient Total Dispatched Calls: 1707 Total Societal Calls: 1129 %of monthly workload 66% #of Calls-BHI** 232 #of Calls Transient 163 #of Calls Dispatched 286 #of Calls Self Initiated 26 Total Time Spent 114:33:091(hr:min:sec) Total BHI/Transient calls 312 *Note 1:Behavioral Health Incidents(BHI)and Transient calls are a subset of the category"Societal"calls.The statistics above are based on officer inputs. **Note 2:An incident may be both BHI and Transient related.These figures are not additive. 4 , .._. Januar 7th Riot update ` I • 1. 10 • 17. ,...,.... .....7._. . . . __ .. .. . _ , . __.: . .. .. ... ......„„ . . .N., .. r. • .. . 47-4 4'ioripi-- , _. ___ Ar '• • 11111 i . 11 l IP' - ..JV Cr 4. a,J ` `..-x17tsH jr Tigard and Police Department�on 'vLrct >' _. ; 14,__. N,Y .,-; , , A, , r 1* , Strategis Dashboard for January 2021 1112 rtI `` 1." 9` Employee Snapshot Department Staffing Information Actual Budget %Budget Sworn 69.( 79.( 87% Non-Sworn 16.0 18.0 89% Total Number of Personnel 85.0 97.0 88°A AIS-4574 3. A. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/09/2021 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: Approve City Council Meeting Minutes Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda Public Hearing: No Publication Date: Information ISSUE Approve City Council meeting minutes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Approve minutes as submitted. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Attached council minutes are submitted for City Council approval: •August 11, 2020 •August 18, 2020 • September 8, 2020 OTHER ALTERNATIVES N/A COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments August 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes August 18, 2020 Meeting Minutes September 8, 2020 Meeting Minutes , City of Tigard = . Tigard City Council Meeting Minutes TIGARD August 11, 2020 1. STUDY SESSION A. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS • Councilor Lueb had no reports since Council's last liaison report. • Councilor Newton shared that the Youth Advisory Council elected a treasurer and the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) group would be meeting later that week to discuss funding priorities. • Councilor Anderson met with property owners regarding issues with the location of the Tigard Farmers Market, along with City Manager Wine and Tigard Chamber of Commerce CEO Debi Mollahan. A resolution was reached, and the market will move back further into the plaza to meet COVID requirements. He said there were no reports from the Regional Water Consortium and commented on the resignation of Mayor Axelrod in West Linn. • Youth Councilor Calderon reported that the Tigard Youth Advisory Council (TYAC) is looking into online, socially distanced community service opportunities. The TYAC is supportive of the Transformation Commission and didn't have any specific concerns. Mayor Snider suggested the group Packed with Pride and Calderon confirmed they were in talks with them. • Council President Goodhouse suggested TYAC look into partnering with the Family Promise Center. He reported on several meetings and projects,including: o Willamette Intake Facility project is moving forward, o Washington County Board debating whether to endorse Metro's "Get Moving" Transportation measure, o National League of Cities (NLC) equity summit later in the week, o Leadership Tigard graduation, o A presentation Senior Transportation Planner Dave Roth gave to an NLC subcommittee on the City's Streets for People Program, o Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee (TTAC) is reaching out to local agencies for support in resolving concerns about the Hall Boulevard Station of the SW Corridor project, and o Tigard Farmers Market issues. • Mayor Snider discussed the Metro "Get Moving"Transportation measure and whether the Council wishes to support the measure or issue an official endorsement. He noted that the funding mechanism Metro has chosen is raising significant concerns from local governments,non-profit organizations and businesses. Key points discussed by Council included: o Councilor Newton has concerns and specific questions regarding the amount to be levied. o Council President Goodhouse expressed that Metro Council is out of touch and are not listening to the true concerns of the business community. He said he did not think they were prepared for opposition since their measures always pass. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 1 of 14 o There was discussion about a new Hall Boulevard Station design that was submitted to TriMet in June and acknowledgement that TriMet is reviewing those design revisions. o Councilor Anderson says TriMet is aware of Tigard's feelings about the SW Corridor and the concerns surrounding Hall Boulevard Station. He said polling led the Metro Council to decide on a payroll tax, since other local agencies are pursuing registration fees and increased gas taxes. Councilor Anderson highlighted it would be a high tax. o Youth Councilor Calderon said he is not very knowledgeable on this topic and Councilor Anderson offered to provide him with a detailed briefing. o Councilor Lueb expressed serious concerns about the funding structure as well as the Hall Boulevard Station. She said she was on the fence and they should wait until there is more information about the final funding mechanism. o Mayor Snider added the Council could support the measure and not the funding mechanism. o Council President Goodhouse said he thought the Council should send a message to Metro that they don't agree with the funding mechanism. o Mayor Snider said he has already made offline comments to Metro Council President Lynn Peterson regarding Tigard's concerns about the Hall Boulevard Station and the funding mechanism in the measure. He said they did not seek out any creative solutions for funding the measure. o Councilor Newton suggested Metro should spread the funding out across a gas tax, a registration fee, or something similar to make the measure more palatable. o Mayor Snider announced there was not consensus on sending an official letter to Metro on this topic. The decision was to let it lie and see what happens in the coming weeks. Mayor Snider reported that the most recent state legislative session was primarily budget and COVID-19 focused,with other issues being punted to a future session. Mayor Snider highlighted that certain individuals have been challenging the city's statements about systemic racism in Tigard and the need for the Transformation Commission. He said he was struck that people do not understand what racism is and do not think systemic racism exists in Tigard. Mayor Snider suggested some reading and video materials that he found particularly informative. He plans to continue reaching out to those people to engage in a dialogue. He shared a story of a recent instance of racism in the community and suggested partnering to do a storytelling session on racism. Every Council member agreed that would be helpful and interesting. 2. BUSINESS MEETING A. At 7:30 p.m. Mayor Snider called the meeting to order. B. Deputy City Recorder Patton called the roll. Present Absent Councilor Anderson ✓ TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 2 of 14 Mayor Snider ✓ Youth Councilor Calderon ✓ Council President Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Newton ✓ Councilor Lueb ✓ C. Mayor Snider invited everyone to mute themselves and join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items —None. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Snider announced that written public comments were due by 4:30 p.m. and call in questions will be taken via telephone for agenda items 3.E. Phone-In Public Comment, and 6. Informational Public Hearing: City Manager Recruitment Process. The public may call in to get in the queue. The call-in number, 503-966-4101,is now posted on the screen. A. Follow up to previous public comment—None. B. Update from Chief McAlpine— Police Chief Kathy McAlpine presented the July 2020 Strategic Dashboard, featuring a new layout. Highlights of her report included: • July is the first month to outpace calls year-over-year from 2019 since the pandemic began. • There are a lot of resources going to repeat callers with mental health and houselessness challenges. • Under photo enforcement, red light cameras are now issuing intersectional speed citations.There have been 800 incidents recorded this month that police officers have to review. • Levy updates are included with budget tracking of levy funds and snapshots of progress month to month. • They are hiring several additional officers currently and hope to increase officer presence to all five districts in the city. • A new police transparency page has been added,which will include the monthly strategic dashboards presented to Council and years of data on police stops and use of force. She highlighted a video response the city produced regarding the Tigard Police response to the George Floyd incident. Mayor Snider called attention to the volume of speed violations occurring on Highway 99W at SW 72°d Ave. He noted there had been three pedestrian deaths in the area over the past five years. Police Chief McAlpine said the highest speed recorded there was 74 mph in the 35 mph zone. Council President Goodhouse asked the average violation speed and she said the average violation was above the speed limit by 14-15 mph. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 3 of 14 C. Tigard Area Chamber Update— Jessica Love, Community and Membership Engagement with the Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce congratulated the Leadership Tigard Class of 2020 and said they are now accepting applications for the class of 2020-21. She highlighted several upcoming Chamber of Commerce events: • "Tele-work,Tele-school,Tele-what?" on August 19`h at 9:00 a.m. • Eat Local Night on August 18th from 5:00 to 9:00 p.m. • New free webinar series beginning in September with "Cash is King" on budget planning and forecasting. • Virtual Networking Event every Thursday at 8:00 a.m. • Staycation Social Hour on August 27th • Tigard Farmers Market is halfway through the season. • Artwalk is now an Art Scavenger Hunt at the end of August. Ms. Love shared that there should be an announcement coming soon from the candidate endorsement committee as well as Metro Council candidate endorsements. She announced this year's high school scholarship recipients. Mayor Snider said the Council would be hosting Good Morning Tigard on September 8`h. D. Summary of Written Public Comment—None. E. Phone-in Public Comment—None. 3. CONSENT AGENDA The Mayor announced the Consent Agenda is used for routine items including receipt of council meeting calendars, and approval of contracts or intergovernmental agreements. Information on each item is available on the city's website in the packet for this meeting. These items may be enacted in one motion without separate discussion. Council members may request that an item be removed by motion for discussion and separate action. A. CONSIDERATION OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR A WATER INTERTIE FEASIBILITY STUDY WITH THE CITY OF BEAVERTON & TUALATIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (TVWD) Councilor Anderson made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilor Lueb seconded. Mayor Snider asked Deputy Recorder Patton to conduct a roll call vote. Yes No Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Snider ✓ Council President Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Newton V Councilor Lueb V The motion passed unanimously. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 4 of 14 Mayor Snider announced that the City Council would convene as the Local Contract Review Board for the next agenda item. 4. CONTRACT AWARD FOR TIER 1 & 2 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HELP DESK SUPPORT TO BRIDGE TECH,LLC Contracts and Purchasing Manager Moody provided the staff report,beginning with a review of the Request for Proposals (RFP) process. From a total of three responses,Bridge Tech,LLC was chosen as the highest scored proposal. IT Manager Nolop explained the services being provided under the contract and the greater efficiencies achieved through contracting for these services. Chair Snider asked about the term of the contract in light of the total amount of$750,000. That not-to-exceed amount covers a five-year term, specifically a three-year term with an option to extend 2 additional years. The total averages out to $150,000 per year. Director Newton asked about the computer support technical position slated to be eliminated. She clarified that the position was currently budgeted but not filled, and Mr. Nolop confirmed. Funds from that position allowed them to complete the proof of concept and will fund these services into the future. Director Goodhouse made a motion to approve the Contract Award for Tier 1 &2 IT Help Desk Support to Bridge Tech,LLC. Director Newton seconded. Chair Snider asked Deputy Recorder Patton to conduct a roll call vote. Yes No Director Anderson ✓ Chair Snider ✓ Director Goodhouse ✓ Director Newton ✓ Director Lueb ✓ The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Snider announced the Board would reconvene as the City Council for the remainder of the meeting. 6. INFORMATIONAL PUBLIC HEARING: CITY MANAGER RECRUITMENT PROCESS A. Mayor Snider opened the public hearing. B. Mayor Snider invited HR Director Bennett to provide the staff report. She explained that City Manager Wine had provided notice not to renew her employment contract so they will be embarking on a City Manager selection process. Ms. Bennett reviewed the requirements and classification details for the position. She provided an overview of the scope of work for a recruitment contracting firm. C. Mayor Snider asked if there was any written public testimony received or phone-in public testimony. There was none. D. There was no response to public testimony. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 5 of 14 E. Mayor Snider closed the public hearing. F. Council discussion of the City Manager Recruitment Process Mayor Snider said there were three main areas he would like the Council to respond to: (1) the level of Council involvement and whether to designate one or two Councilors to represent the Council through the process, (2) whether to use an executive search firm, and (3) potential appointment of an Interim City Manager. • Councilor Anderson asked how recruitment firms have been employed by the city in the past. The last time was to hire the Police Chief and this scope of work is in line with that one, since both require a lot of community input. Ms. Bennett clarified the Library Director and last two Assistant City Manager recruitments were done in house. Councilor Anderson agreed it was important to use an executive search firm. He said he supported an Interim City Manager and assumed Assistant City Manager Nyland would step into that role. • Councilor Newton agreed that a professional search firm would produce more targeted outreach to the desired audience. She supported a City Councilor being engaged in the entire the hiring process. She said she thought the timeline was long enough she would support identifying someone to serve as Interim City Manager. • Youth Councilor Calderon said he supported an Interim City Manager,having one or two Councilors in the process. • Councilor Lueb said she supported one or two members of Council being part of the hiring process to keep the ball rolling and agreed there was a need for an executive search firm. • Council President Goodhouse was in support of employing an executive search firm, involving a couple of City Councilors in the hiring process and appointing an Interim City Manager. Mayor Snider concluded that Council consensus was to pursue a contract with an executive search firm for the City Manager hiring process and appointing an Interim City Manager. There was also agreement that one or more Councilors should be engaged in the hiring process and Mayor Snider identified Council President Goodhouse, Councilor Newton and Youth Councilor Calderon as the participating Council members. Mayor Snider said he supported an executive search firm, appointing an Interim City Manager. 7. DISCUSS COMMUNITY INPUT ON THE TRANSFORMATION COMMISSION Assistant City Manager Nyland introduced Kent Wyatt, Communications Manager and Nicole Hendrix, Senior Management Analyst to share a summary of the public feedback received regarding the Transformation Commission. Communications Manager Wyatt provided background on the body and how they pursued getting feedback from the public. Senior Management Analyst Hendrix shared the infographic showing summary statistics for the data received from the public regarding the Transformation Committee. Key highlights included: • Staff received 132 feedback responses. • 81 percent of respondents supported the creation of the Transformation Commission. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 6 of 14 • Majority of responses were received through city website's webform. Ms. Hendrix said two topic areas consistently arose,beginning with why the proposal did not incorporate more city services, only police. Mayor Snider stated that problem is caused by the name being shortened from "Public Safety Transformation Commission."Mayor Snider felt changing the name was confusing the public,namely by removing the term public safety. Councilor Newton recalled the idea originally came from Council,intending public services to be only the first step in a larger process. The second topic area was greater focus on the police budget,particularly transparency. Senior Management Analyst Hendrix highlighted the newly launched Tigard Police transparency page to help aid in that effort. In terms of membership, comments reflected a desire to include more black,indigenous and people of color representation in addition to broader representation with the county and schools. There were also suggestions to let the community be involved in the selection of the members on the commission. Ms. Hendrix reviewed several wording changes suggested by respondents and the removal of a sentence they felt was inaccurate. The sentence was called tone deaf and not true for all members of the Tigard community. Communications Manager Wyatt concluded with staff's next steps. There is training occurring in the Police department, staff have reached out to professional facilitators and are adding staff for the Commission. Mr. Wyatt noted the public would like a caucus-style process for appointing members. Mayor Snider asked for questions only from the Council at this time. Youth Councilor Calderon inquired about the timeline for hiring a facilitator and when staff thought the commission would come together. Mayor Snider said that was one of the things staff are seeking input on. He believed staff were asking for Council's thoughts on a potential start date of early 2021 and Communications Manager Wyatt confirmed. Councilor Anderson said there was input on tweaks to the wording in the proposal and whether staff had a recommendation about what to change. Mayor Snider said he had a list of 30-40 points to cover and that would be included. Mayor Snider stated he had collected comments submitted by the Committee for Community Citizen Engagement (CCE),Tigard Police Officers'Association (TPOA) and the community from all the responses received. He asked staff to track Council's decisions for each of these points. Mayor Snider introduced the CCE comments,which included: • Whether Council should offer compensation for members'participation o Youth Councilor Calderon asked if that would apply to only the 6 resident members. Mayor Snider said that was up for discussion. o Council President Goodhouse said he was in favor of paid daycare,meals or other direct costs of participating but was concerned about compensation. o Councilor Newton agreed to remove barriers and would not want it to cost members financially to participate. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 7 of 14 o Councilor Lueb was in support. o Councilor Anderson was in support. Determination: Consensus to pursue providing alternative compensation to members to offset direct costs incurred, e.g. transportation, childcare, or meals. • Use a caucus-style process for selecting members o Councilor Lueb suggested a hybrid approach,where the community chooses the top 12 and Council could choose the final six members. o Councilor Anderson was in support. o Councilor Newton was in support of the approach. Determination: Consensus to employ a hybrid approach to selecting the final members of the commission in which the community will determine the top 12 candidates and Council will make a final decision on the six appointments. • Add a requirement or incentive for police officers to live within the city o Councilor Newton said she had attended the CCE meeting and thought it was an education item, but not necessarily a topic that needed to be part of this discussion. Mayor Snider suggested Police Chief McAlpine publish information on the police transparency page additional information on where officers live and why they make choices to live where they do. o Police Chief McAlpine said her only concern was disclosing the location of officers' homes given the volatile climate at the moment. Mayor Snider agreed they could reach a compromise with more generalized data,perhaps at the county level. o Council President Goodhouse thought it would be a good opportunity to answer those questions since they do come up. Determination: Police Chief McAlpine will follow-up with information on the police transparency webpage. Mayor Snider then reviewed the TPOA suggestions,which included: • Change the name of the commission to the Public Safety Advisory Committee o Mayor Snider felt it made the charge of the group weaker and words matter. o Council President Goodhouse expressed concern with changing the title of the body again. o Mayor Snider explained why he didn't feel like it was an advisory commission since the body will direct the Police Chief and City Manager. o Councilor Newton said the term advisory did not reflect the group's charge. o Councilor Lueb favored the Public Safety Transformation Commission. Determination: Do not change name of commission. • Describe leadership structure for the commission o Mayor Snider said staff and he could draft text for this section. o No one on Council objected. Determination: Add the requested language, to be drafted by Mayor Snider and staff. • Add wording that their participation in the commission was not in lieu of collective bargaining agreement terms o Mayor Snider suggested adding that wording. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 8 of 14 o No one on Council objected. Determination: Add the requested language. • Reduce youth participation on the commission given the serious nature o Mayor Snider said he did not agree with this suggestion since 2/15 was not even representative of the community demographically. o Youth Councilor Calderon said he disagreed with suggestion and that age does not determine knowledge on this topic and it's important to hear youth's perspective since it is going to be their community. o Council President Goodhouse said he did not oppose the youth representation, but he thought that if there was a BSU (Black Student Union) representative there should be representation for other groups at the high school. o Mayor Snider said Youth Councilor Calderon was there to represent the entire student body. He said he thought it would be tone deaf to not include the BSU representative. o Council President Goodhouse proposed the school selecting a representative. o Councilor Newton praised Youth Councilor Calderon for making himself very involved and accessible to the area youth and in the high school community. o Councilor Lueb pointed out that the language says it can be a representative from the BSU or their designee. Determination: Do not change the amount of youth representation. • Add wording that some topics will require bargaining o Mayor Snider suggested adding that wording. o No one on Council objected. Determination: Add the requested language. • Add "Recruit Training Evaluation Program (RTEP)" to the training section. o Chief McAlpine said it was just an informational addition for the public's benefit. She recommended adding the requested reference. o No one on Council objected. Determination: Add the requested language. • Concern about biases in the department's psychiatric evaluation o Mayor Snider asked Chief McAlpine how they know the psychiatric evaluation is free of biases. She said she relies on their psychologists to not have biases in their evaluation techniques. Chief McAlpine suggested they bring their psychologist in to describe the psychological evaluation process to the commission. o Chief McAlpine agreed to work with the City Manager and City Attorney to develop language that addresses the bias issue raised by TPOA. Determination: Add the requested language, to be drafted by the Police Chief, City Manager and City Attorney. • Concern with the stated topic area "police workforce that reflects the community" and proposed to update the language to read"to maintain a police workforce reflective of the Tigard community." o Mayor Snider said it is not representative in terms of the Latinx community. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 9 of 14 o Police Chief McAlpine responded that the concern was with trying to match the department percentage to percentage instead of a generalized diversity goal. o Councilor Lueb agreed with adding the term "maintain," to read "to maintain a police workforce reflective of the community." o No one on Council objected to this proposal. Determination: Revise topic language to add the word "maintain." • Clarification around using membership in an extremist or racist group as a condition of employment and specifically who will determine what constitutes an extremist or racist group. o Mayor Snider asked Police Chief McAlpine if she could develop language on this topic and she agreed. o No one on Council objected. Determination: Add the requested language, to be drafted by the Police Chief. Mayor Snider then reviewed community input,including: • Questions about the BIPOC training and whether there is a virtual way to complete ride- alongs, etc. o Councilor Newton acknowledged it was a concern but said she did not have a good response about how to address these challenges. o Councilor Anderson pointed out that in January COVID could be a non-issue or could still be in play. He thought the training was important and needed to happen. o Council President Goodhouse suggested some accommodations that could be made and said that the training is valuable. He suggested community members could ride with an officer of color if that made them feel more comfortable, for example. o Councilor Lueb said she has gone on ride-alongs and recognizes how important they are to educate citizens on the danger officers face. She said her experience may not reflect that of other community members,however. She proposed police officers and members of the commission be required to watch the two one-hour videos and read the book. o Council President Goodhouse suggested the community could help choose the materials they require, and Mayor Snider agreed. o Youth Councilor Calderon agreed members may be hesitant to do a ride-along and he relates to that feeling,but said he understands there is not a good substitute for a ride-along with an officer. He was supportive of allowing community members choose to go with an officer of color, adding that allowing them to meet with the officer beforehand would help build a relationship in advance. Determination: Make accommodations to make community members comfortable with the required training within reason. • Add police budget accountability and transparency as a topic area o Mayor Snider suggested adding the topic area. o No one on Council objected. Determination: Added "police budget accountability and transparency" as a topic area for the commission. • Remove the "no-incident" statement TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 1.3125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 10 of 14 o Mayor Snider suggested they consider changing the language. He said it's true the Tigard Police Department has not made national news,which is what that sentence is supposed to communicate. However,he understands that how it is written is contradictory to some people's personal experiences in Tigard. He invited creative suggestions from the Council to correct the issue. o Council President Goodhouse proposed adding the information the Mayor provided as a disclaimer. o Councilor Anderson suggested just taking the sentence out. o Councilor Lueb concurred with removing the statement to recognize those who feel they have had those experiences. o Councilor Newton agreed to remove the statement to recognize those experiences. o Mayor Snider said it was added from prior versions based on a suggestion from the TPOA to distinguish themselves from the national narrative on bad policing. Mayor Snider said he agreed it could be taken out. o Youth Councilor Calderon agreed to remove the statement. o Mayor Snider polled the Council and there were no objections to this removal. Determination: Remove the sentence, "There have not been any incidents in Tigard that look and feel like those documented in the national media." • Request to add definitions of equity,lived experience implicit bias and racism. o Mayor Snider suggested adding these definitions as requested. o No one on Council objected. Determination: Add definitions for the terms equity,lived experience implicit bias and racism. • Broaden the scope beyond public safety o Mayor Snider suggested staff beef up the section that states "The city commission will be just one part of the city's anti-racism action plan." He added this is what they're doing to address public safety as a first step,but other issues will be addressed and are being worked on. o No one on Council objected. Determination: Staff to add language regarding the focus on public safety as one step of a larger process. • Increased BIPOC representation o Mayor Snider said the group is already at a maximum, so to add members they would need to remove other slots. o Youth Councilor Calderon agreed BIPOC representation is important, especially since the next Youth Councilor and BSU designee could not be people of color. He did not think they could add additional members but said members should be hearing from and reaching out to BIPOC members of the community regularly. o Councilor Lueb said she thought that they had the right direction and verbiage in the proposal to communicate their goal is diverse participation. o Councilor Anderson agreed with keeping the wording as is since it is framed nicely. He supported members being"Tigard only." TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 1.3125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 11 of 14 o Council President Goodhouse said he agreed to make it Tigard only. He hoped the public comment portion of the meetings would allow for greater participation by members of the local BIPOC community. o Councilor Newton concurred with previous comments and the importance of the public being able to weigh in through public comment. o Mayor Snider proposed keeping the structure and representation the same but directing staff to add a section about public input so it is clear there is an expectation the commission will have a structured time to accept public comment. o No one on Council objected. Determination: Staff to add a section describing expectations for the commission to receive public input. • Questions about the participation of the City Attorney and Municipal Court Judge and whether to include a public defender o Council President Goodhouse said he thought it would be good to have that perspective. o Councilor Lueb thought the City Attorney was there to ensure the city is not breaking any laws and pointed out the City Attorney is not a prosecutor. She did not support adding a commission member. o Councilor Anderson said they could bring in a public defender as a guest speaker, but they would not be required as a voting member. o City Attorney Rihala said she agreed her role would not be as a city prosecutor but as a factual,neutral contributor. o Council agreed not to add this position. Determination: Do not add a public defender to the commission membership. • Using Reimagine Oregon topics as a blueprint for topic areas o Mayor Snider asked staff to look at the topics and add ones that are not covered in the current proposal. Determination: The City Manager and City Attorney will review and add topics that are absent from the topic areas list. • Educational campaign on racism in Tigard o Council President Goodhouse reiterated that education is the most important component to let people know what racism is and that it exists in Tigard. He asked for an intense communication series covering a variety of related topics for the community. Mayor Snider clarified that he was proposing a major public education campaign between now and when the commission gets started about life in Tigard in the BIPOC community. o Council agreed. Determination: Staff to add a major educational campaign on racism in Tigard to the proposal. • Include participation expectations for members o Councilor Lueb suggested more logistical details be included in the proposal, particularly regarding expectations for participation. o Council agreed. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 1.3125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 12 of 14 Determination: Add this language to the proposal. • Alternate commission members o Council President Goodhouse proposed adding alternate members in case someone gets sick or moves away. o Mayor Snider said that was an excellent idea and proposed the public caucus select 16 total members, from which the Council will select eight—two of which would be alternates. o Council agreed. Determination: Ask the caucus to select 16 total members from the applicants, from which the Council will select eight members to be appointed to the commission, two of which would be alternates. Youth Councilor Calderon pointed out his term would be expiring in July 2021. Mayor Snider said he thought that he and the BSU designee would be on the commission for the long haul, unless they refused. Mr. Calderon said that it may be a concern if the BSU designee is a Senior this year. Mayor Snider suggested that be emphasized in selecting the person who will fill that position. Mayor Snider said he anticipated a new draft proposal would need to come back to Council for review before final approval. He said he expected it back before Council in the next two weeks. 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS–None. 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT– Assistant City Manager Nyland reported a new communications infographic feature that has been added to their weekly newsletter. Project updates included: • Finalizing the Total Tyler Enterprise System contract, • Feedback on the Refreshed Strategic Plan from staff and the public, • Fanno Creek Trail Crossing on the Tigard Engage website with 1,800 total visitors, • COVID signage requests have risen to more than 500 new signs since the beginning of the pandemic, • Library takeout service launched June 17th and has had more than 2,500 pickups so far. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Snider announced that the Tigard City Council will go into Executive Session to consider the employment of a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent under ORS 192.660(2)(a). All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4), but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 11. ADJOURNMENT TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 1.3125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov I Page 13 of 14 At 10:45 p.m., Councilor Lueb made a motion to adjourn. Council President Goodhouse seconded. Yes No Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Snider ✓ Council President Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Newton ✓ Councilor Lueb ✓ The motion passed unanimously. Caroline Patton,Deputy City Recorder Attest: Jason B. Snider,Mayor Date: TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 11, 2020 City of Tigard 1 1.3125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 14 of 14 City of Ti2-ard City Council & TCDA Workshop Meeting TIGARD August 18, 2020 1. WORKSHOP MEETING A. At 6:30 p.m. Mayor Snider called the Tigard City Council and Town Center Development Agency meeting to order. B. City Recorder Krager called the roll. Present Absent Councilor Lueb ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Snider ✓ Youth Councilor Calderon ✓ Council President Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Newton ✓ C. Pledge of Allegiance—Mayor Snider asked that everyone mute their mics and join in the Pledge of Allegiance virtually. A flag was presented on the screen. D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items—None. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Public Comments submitted electronically for this meeting—None. 3. RECEIVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE City Engineer Faha gave the staff report and a slide presentation on the status of Capital Improvement Plan projects in the final quarter of Fiscal Year 2020, the first since COVID-19 restrictions went into place. Her presentation indicated the budget and schedule status of Parks, Streets,Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stormwater, and Facilities projects. In response to a question from Council President Goodhouse on the Tiedeman Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk Project delay, City Engineer Faha said it got delayed until 2022 due to timing and workload issues. It was also very difficult to get people to remove their cars from the street. City Engineer Faha discussed and showed a slide of the Key Projects in Fiscal Year 2021 and noted approximately one-third of CIP Street Funds are going towards bike/pedestrian projects. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 1 of 11 She said a stabilization design is beginning for the Kruger Creek project but paying for it is predicated on Council-approved rate increases that have been delayed due to COVID-19. Councilor Newton said it was good to get a sense of the impact delaying the rate increases has caused and asked that information on this project be presented at the October Budget Committee meeting scheduled to discuss effects of COVID-19 on the city's finances. City Engineer Faha will work with the Finance Department to prepare information on the impacts. Council President Goodhouse asked that potential alternatives be included. Mayor Snider said it was good to see that major work is being done on making significant improvements happen for everyone. Councilor Lueb commented that the Pavement Management Program work is obvious to residents,but a lot of other projects go unseen. She commented that the CIP update is important because it shows that we are still working, even though our buildings are closed due to COVID. 4. RECEIVE UPDATE ON SW ASCENSION DRIVE TRAFFIC ISSUES City Engineer Faha gave the staff report and a slide presentation on Ascension Drive traffic issues, the adjusted proposal and what staff learned along the way. She acknowledged that the city needs to improve its complaint management program and is learning how to do community outreach during COVID;under similar situations in the past there would have been in-person neighborhood meetings. She showed a slide of Ascension Drive on Bull Mountain, a steep, narrow (28-foot wide) street that should have been marked with no parking on at least one side of the inner curves. There is no record of why it was not signed that way when built in 1995. She gave a history of the neighborhood traffic complaints. In 2017, Council heard public complaints about reckless drivers and speeding.After listening to issues, the City responded by posting 15-mile per hour advisory speed limits,purchased "Your Speed Is..." feedback signs and started collecting data for enforcement. Traffic engineers say the speeding data showed 85% are at, or less than 5 miles, over the posted speed limit. She noted that while police might say they only pull over a driver if they are operating at ten miles over the speed limit, a person living along a residential street might feel that five miles over the limit seems much too fast. She noted that the term "speeding"may have different definitions to different groups.A request was made for the installation of speed humps,which the city denied. In February of 2020 the city received a complaint of low visibility through the S-curves. Staff investigation confirmed substandard vision distance in the curves,particularly when cars were parked there. The city sent a letter to neighbors that the solution to this potentially dangerous situation was to remove parking on the S-curves. This was met with complaints. An additional letter with a detailed explanation of the engineering analysis was sent to more neighbors,which created more unhappiness regarding no parking. City staff attempted to set up individual meetings with property owners via Microsoft Teams due to COVID-19.An engagement webpage was created to collect additional input. This included an amended proposal for no parking on one side based on Teams meetings input. City Engineer Faha agreed that it was difficult to lose all parking, so she overrode the initial investigation and amended the recommendation to allow some parking and try to get people to TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 2 of 11 drive less recklessly with other measures, such as added striping in the middle of the curves and pursuing a 20-mph neighborhood streets program,including implementation on Ascension Drive if the program gets approved by Council. The engagement website had 257 visits and staff heard three key messages: add speed humps,issues with increasing traffic volume, and 40%were unsupportive of removing parking in the S-curves. They heard clearly from the people living on the S-curves that removing all parking would create access and livability issues. City Engineer Faha said she did not recommend speed humps for Ascension Drive as the city does not have a speed hump program at this time. There are speed humps in Tigard, but they were placed over five years ago. She felt they belong in the toolkit of traffic calming measures which staff are currently developing. Blocking the street to outside traffic was requested by some in the neighborhood but is not under consideration. The city is growing and almost every street is seeing traffic increases due to that growth.Ascension Drive is a neighborhood route needed to provide connectivity and be available to those living in nearby neighborhoods. Ms. Faha said the city receives hundreds of traffic complaints per year. This project brought to light concerns about the level of neighborhood involvement in responding to these concerns and complaints. Staff learned that we need a comprehensive and transparent approach to address safety concerns,including a communications plan.We need to use data to help prioritize and direct where limited funding can be used for traffic calming and other measures citywide. Having complaints come into an online website portal makes it more efficient for staff to craft information and responses and share what we can and cannot do, timelines and priorities. City Engineer Faha shared a slide of a draft Traffic Speed Monitoring Table listing streets that the city has received speeding complaints about,the posted speed limit and actual data of speeds being driven on those streets. Ascension Drive is on the list but is ranked near the bottom based on the speeds over the posted speed limit. At the top of the list was 79th Avenue near Durham Road where 85 percent of drivers are at 48 miles per hour in a 25-mile posted speed zone where children are walking to school. Staff are working on measures for that street now. This process will help when a traffic complaint comes in.The first step will be finding out if it is a valid complaint and then second, seeing where it falls on the prioritization list. Another slide showed a map with speeding issues indicated by colored circles, the hotter the color,the greater the priority. Sattler, 79th, and North Dakota Streets are orange,indicating they are near the top priorities. Ascension Drive is colored green and blue, a lower priority indication. Maps such as this can help explain the priority system to citizens. The website for Ascension Drive input is closed and staff will be sending a report back to neighbors on input received and final staff decision—no parking on one side of the S-curves, striping and tactile bumps,installation of a permanent"Your Speed is" sign, continuing data collection and pursuing a 20-mile per hour program and implementation of a more transparent traffic safety and parking issues program. Mayor Snider commented that the report was very thorough and although just a report on the Ascension Drive response was requested this update had great transparency and showed the bigger picture to the entire community. Councilor Anderson asked if the increase in traffic has been exacerbated by GPS routing. City Engineer Faha said the effect of GPS routing is unknown,but there has been a lot of growth. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 3 of 11 Council President Goodhouse asked if there was a cost to put in the 20 mile per hour signs. City Engineer Faha said there is a cost and a plan will be developed because there is just one sign installer in Public Works. Staff will come up with a prioritized list to do first and then go year to year,implementing the plan. He suggested just painting speed hump stripes so people think they are actually there in the street and will slow down. Ms. Faha said while paint upkeep can be costly, she would be willing to try it. Councilor Lueb asked to see the draft Citywide Speed Data Analysis report and asked if there was a long-term plan to address hot spots. City Engineer Faha said staff just analyzed the data and have been directed to start with 79`h Avenue. The plan is that it be based on data rather than who is complaining. Councilor Newton asked if Ascension Drive was rated as a neighborhood street. City Engineer Faha confirmed that it is a neighborhood route,not a collector. Councilor Newton commented that it is important to help people to understand the "why" and the thinking behind a decision. Youth Councilor Calderon spoke from the perspective of a new driver and said this street is terrifying. He asked which side would not have parking and City Engineer Faha said parking will be removed partly on one side and then the other, on the inside of the S-curves. 5. RECEIVE UPDATE ON 1-205 TOLLING PROGRAM City Manager Wine introduced this item. Lucinda Broussard, ODOT Tolling Program Manager, Heather Wills,WSP Consultant Team Project Manager, and Mat Dolata,WSP Alternative Analysis Lead gave an update on the I-5 and 1-205 Toll Projects. Their presentation is in the packet for this meeting. ODOT Tolling Program Manager Broussard said HB2017 allows tolling. There is regional need due to the increase in hours of congestion and hours of delay.The Metro region population will continue to grow, and congestion pricing is seen as a way to decrease congestion. The program is moving into the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) phase which is a two-year process. Extensive input from regional stakeholders, agencies and public during the I-5 and I- 205 Value Pricing Feasibility Analysis identified the need to: • Avoid negatively affecting low-income communities • Improve transit and other transportation choices • Address the potential for tolls creating diversion onto local streets Ms. Broussard said questions arose on equitable implementation of tolling revenues.An Equity and Mobility Advisory Committee was formed to develop a charter and workplan to meet these needs.They are currently in the 45-day public comment period for the I-205 Toll Project which runs through September 16. Community engagement includes online open houses, webinars, Facebook,Twitter, council meeting updates, and meetings with advisory and working groups. The analysis so far is available on their website. The I-5 Toll Project is also being planned. Stakeholder engagement begins in the Fall of 2020 and there will be an Equity and Mobility Advisory Committee and focused outreach to TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 4 of 11 underserved and under-represented communities. I-5 is going through planning and environmental linkages. The project covers Multnomah Avenue to Going Street. Ms. Broussard showed slides showing NEPA and project milestones. Mayor Snider pointed out that he heard this presentation at an ODOT Area 1 meeting and wanted Council and viewers to know that while Ms. Broussard may be new to Oregon, she is not new to these types of programs and has lot of experience in Georgia,Washington, Florida, New York, California and Washington DC. Heather Wills,WSP Consultant Team Project Manager said the purpose of the I-205 Toll Project is to manage congestion on I-205 between Stafford Road and OR 213. Tolling will raise revenue to fund congestion relief projects. Ms.Wills discussed purpose and need statement and how it will be used as a foundation for determining the range of alternatives. ODOT added equity to the decision process and outcomes. Ms.Wills showed a slide of goals and objectives,including those to provide equitable benefits for all users,limited traffic rerouting, and improved safety and regional economic growth among others. The full text of goals and objectives and evaluation criteria is on their website. Mat Dolata,WSP Analysis Lead outlined the screening alternatives analysis for this project They are in the early stages and initial screening and are looking at a range of alternative toll configurations,using Metro's regional travel demand model. Alternative impacts and mitigation will be studied. Changes in 1-205 traffic will include diversion to regional roadways and local roadways, changes in demand,reduced single-occupancy trips and some shift to transit. The peak hours are where they predict the most congestion relief. Mr. Dolata discussed other locations assessed for rerouting effects on 1-5 where impacts are analyzed for each alternative. Mr. Dolata showed a slide of initial recommendations for further study. Alternatives 3 and 4 will advance to NEPA. But they are asking for input at this stage.Comments can be submitted by email and voice mail Council President Goodhouse asked about the impact on semi-trucks and local delivery trucks. Mr. Dolata replied that the biggest impact is that there would be travel time savings along I-205. They will benefit greatly from reduced travel time. The economic impact will be assessed in more detail in the NEPA. Council President Goodhouse asked if tolling would go to the voters and Ms. Broussard said House Bill 2017 dictated tolling so the feasibility analysis was about where tolling will start,not if. Mayor Snider convened the Town Center Development Agency Board for the next item. 6. RECEIVE CITY CENTER FUTURES PROJECT UPDATE Redevelopment Project Manager Farrelly gave the staff report on an update to the City Center Futures Project, joined by Johnson Economics Senior Project Manager Brendan Buckley. There was a slide presentation. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 5 of 11 The City Center Futures Project addresses Strategy 2.2 of Council Goals for 2019-21 —Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment. This includes creating an inventory of sites with potential for transit-oriented development,evaluating the size and scope of the urban renewal plan to determine whether tax increment revenues (TIF) are sufficient to meet Council objectives, and prepare recommendations regarding the City Center urban renewal area's possible continuation, and update the 2007 Leland Report to accelerate downtown development. The focus of this update is the TIF district plan analysis. The City Center TIF district is in its last six years of the 20 years authorized duration and has a maximum indebtedness to undertake plan projects of$22 million.This is a modest budget compared to the Tigard Triangle urban renewal district indebtedness which is nine times greater. It is especially modest considering there are 32 named infrastructure projects, of which 14 have been completed or are in various stages of planning. Very few new infrastructure projects could be completed with the remaining TIF. The district is behind in TIF generation due to the deep recession that came soon after plan adoption. The district was amended in 2017 to extend the boundary but no changes were made to duration or maximum indebtedness. There are a lot of projects and limited funding and time. Consultants Johnson Economics and SERA Architects were hired to help advance Council's Goal 2 through the City Center Futures Project. Johnson Economics Consultant Buckley said one component of looking at the future of the city's TIF district is to study options for continuation of the district beyond 2027. He mentioned three options and findings that led to a recommendation. • Option 1: Maintain the current district and look at ways to extend it by increasing the maximum indebtedness and duration. • Option 2: Close the district early and create a new larger TIF district. • Option 3: Create a new TIF district after district expiration in 2027. Potential expansion areas were explored for this analysis. Considerations included limits on total size and assessed value that can be under urban renewal at one time. Because Tigard just passed 50,000 in population that limit is now 15 percent. When looking at the two current districts there is some capacity left. But under the current plan the boundary cannot be extended. There is a statutory limitation on extending a boundary more than 20 percent.The 2017 boundary extension that used up that capacity. Mr. Buckley said the maximum debt capacity can be extended by 20 percent over the life of the district. There is an inflation factor so inflation since the time of the original adoption can be added to the amount. There is an option for increasing the maximum indebtedness above 20 percent, but it requires concurrence from the other taxing districts representing 75 percent of the permanent tax rate in the district. Option 1 requires voter approval because it increases the maximum debt capacity which qualifies as a substantial amendment to the current plan. Options 2 and 3 would require voter approval because they are new districts. Mr. Buckley said after their analysis,Johnson Economics is recommending Option 1 —Look at extending the maximum indebtedness, expand the duration beyond 2026 and possibly seek TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 6 of 11 concurrence from other taxing jurisdictions for increasing the maximum indebtedness above 20 percent. It would be a substantial amendment to the Urban Renewal Plan and requires voter approval. An advantage is that its frozen base goes back to 2006 and is now approaching $500,000 annually which gives it a good head start. TCDA Chair Snider asked if this was the staff recommendation. Redevelopment Project Manager Farrelly said staff is in accord with this option. With increased resources, the agency could do more projects, such as an extension of the Tigard Street Heritage Trail,parking garage, new projects such as a street project in the Downtown Connective Plan and more development assistance to encourage transit-oriented development and affordable housing. The Town Center Advisory Commission heard a presentation on this in June and is in accord. Staff will return in a few weeks with recommendations and analysis proposals for new projects, a proposal for a new level of maximum indebtedness and a recommendation for when to go to the voters. Director Newton said it is important to engage the other taxing districts early on and be able to articulate what we want to undertake. Councilor Lueb concurred and said that decisions made now impact things down the road so it is important to bring the community along with us and find out the projects they would be interested in supporting. Chair Snider asked for an engagement plan when staff returns to discuss with Council. Council President Goodhouse said there was great outreach last time the urban renewal plan was on the ballot and he wants the city to emulate that. Youth Councilor Calderon said this is important and he looks forward to seeing what can be done with the revenue. City Attorney Rihala was asked what would happen if a referral to the voters failed. She replied that it depends upon how the ballot title is written. The existing URD would remain and the amendments would not go into effect. Director Goodhouse mentioned the previous urban renewal measure outreach and said he wanted the city communications to emulate those activities, such as highlighting projects and outlining what has been accomplished. Chair Snider said if it failed, Council could take action that would not require voter approval or retry for approval on another election. Director Anderson said the city should at least extend the timeline and said he was in favor of Option 1. Councilors Newton and Lueb agreed. Redevelopment Project Manager Farrelly will return with a fully formed recommendation. Mayor Snider reconvened the City Council for the next items. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 7 of 11 7. RECEIVE PARKS MASTER PLAN UPDATE Public Works Director Rager introduced this agenda item and noted that Interim Parks, Recreation and Green Spaces Manager McKnight, Program Coordinator Staedter, Community Engagement Coordinator Grass and MIG Director of Planning Services Alex Dupey were attending virtually. Project Coordinator Staedter said the Parks Master Plan Update project is moving along well, and staff have discovered some interesting things. One that she is most excited about is that this is a great framework to achieve Council Goals and goals in general. A natural result of growth in the city is inequity. We can look at making it more equitable. Unlike most utility master plans this one is very much driven by the community. There are some good plans for how to get the community to participate and give input. Alex Dupey,MIG Director of Planning Services discussed the project milestones. The Park Condition Assessment and 10-minute Walk Analysis are complete. The State of Tigard Parks & Recreation Summary Report is in draft form and an Opportunities and Gaps Analysis is in process. This fall, they will start recommendations and prioritizations, and examine staffing and funding to see if they align. A Parks and Recreation Organizational Assessment will be completed in December 2020. The Public Draft Plan will be presented to Council in February 2021. He briefly discussed Tigard's demographics: • 47 %are under 18 or over 55. These are park users! • 15 %live on less than $25,000/yr. and 34%make over $100,000/yr. • 82% are white, similar to the Portland area. Tigard Parks and Recreation in 2020: There are 270 acres of developed parks and 234 acres of natural areas. Tigard was able to purchase over 100 acres of land due to a well-timed bond acquisition.Tigard has had 5 years of expanding recreation programming. The Parks System overview is well rounded. A slide was shown of the various uses and where they can be found in the natural areas, neighborhood parks, community parks,linear parks or future parks. Recreation trends were explored. Parks are used differently than they were 10-20 years ago. Uses have shifted. Demographics have changed. Large family gatherings are very important to some people of color. There is a demand for trail-based activities and health and wellness activities with items adjacent to trails (fitness equipment). Mr. Dupey said a trend is that cities are getting more out of their parks and public spaces by providing programming. This enhances the community benefits,increases participation among underserved groups,provides essential services to vulnerable populations and activates public spaces. Another trend is the COVID-19 response. There is an increased demand for parks, trails and open spaces and decreases in program fees and facility rental revenue. Outdoor physical activity is demonstrated to reduce stress and improve mental health. He said the CDC TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 8 of 11 recommends keeping public park facilities open as the homeless population relies on public restrooms. Mr. Dupey showed a map slide indicating areas in Tigard that meet or do meet the 10-minute Walk Analysis with the goal that "Every American should be within a 10-miute walk of a quality park."This is the norm nationally and Tigard has used this standard for a while. He showed a slide indicated areas in Tigard where residents are within a 10-minute walk to a major trail and finally, a map showing demographics and housing types for 12 areas outside the 10-minute walk which could potentially guide decision-making around investments. Community engagement included Plan to Play: Opportunities Survey going on from August 2020 to January 2020. An intercept dot exercise in August 2019 Stakeholder interviews in May 2020, and Focus Groups in March 2020. Going on now is an online map-based questionnaire. This will help show gaps and opportunities. Mr. Dupey showed a slide listing what they have heard from the community. Comments such as being surrounded by nature;walking,running and biking on trails is important, desire for connected trails,unique play experiences and parks within walking distance. Constraints on the number of youth-involved in sports include cost and capacity. Equitable access for all abilities, ages and backgrounds is important.There needs to be a focus on activating park sites and supporting community-driven events. Opportunities are existing land and facilities, evolving/growing recreation options, complete and linked trail systems and renewal of the Tigard Triangle are. COVID-19 creates a need for close to home recreation opportunities. Mr. Dupey said there are challenges are serving citizens equitably, filling in gaps in the built community, funding a growing system,connecting our neighborhoods an sustaining the park and recreation system in a recession. Youth Councilor Calderon commented that he enjoys using the parks and trails. He said families are sad that some parks are not open right now. Councilor Anderson said he looks forward to seeing when some of the newer parks will come on line. He said people want trails to cover longer distances and asked how they can access those. Consultant Dupey said there are trails that connect parks so there is no deadend and also trail connections along streets to help complete the longer trail segments. Councilor Lueb mentioned she has been involved in this process and is thankful for a very active PRAB. She was surprised to see the 10-minute walk analysis map showed so many gaps and said the city needs to be on top of this as our population increases and we add density. Councilor Newton expressed concern about low-income neighborhoods that do not have as much access to parks and trails. She said she completed the online survey but lives near three parks and could only select one. Council President Goodhouse asked if part of the study is how to communicate to new residents the location of parks in Tigard. He suggested more signage with QR codes or a board with TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 9 of 11 pictures. MIG Consultant Dupey said wayfinding was not a component of this scope of work, but it could be recommended as an implementation step. 8. NON-AGENDA ITEMS None. 9. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT City Manager Wine noted that in three of the presentations tonight there was mapping analysis and she wanted to highlight that. She said Council will be seeing more use of GIS data that will identify areas of greatest transportation need in the city. Phase 4 of Tigard CARES (Commercial Assistance & Relief for Economic Stability) was launched and within 24 hours there were 100 applicants. And as of 5 p.m. today there were 180 applications from businesses seeking assistance. The award recipients will be notified as soon as possible. City staff completed a survey about how they are navigating working in the COVID-19 environment. They are reporting back that they can work effectively in their current remote work situations. Staff feel supported during this pandemic and 88% strongly agreed that city management is communicating effectively. The same number feel workers should not return to a city office environment until 2021. Barriers to working effectively from home include the physical workspace and interruptions. When asked how much notice they prefer before reporting back to their city workspace, they said several weeks. City Manager Wine reiterated that the city is open for business; the survey was talking about a physical opening. Until we can open our buildings and not need the recommended 6 feet of space between people,we are being creative in our use of city building space and scheduling. The city is acknowledging the 19th Amendment to the Constitution which states that the right to vote will not be denied on the basis of gender. Police Chief McAlpine and Commander McDonald are working on a virtual event with Building Bridges. Building Bridges was established in 2016 and brings together social organizations and police. City Manager Wine said the Police Department is considering whether to participate in National Night Out this year due to COVID restrictions. TVF&R has announced they will not be participating this year. Council president Goodhouse asked if there was a way to connect virtually with National Night Out and City Manager Wine will check on that. 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION—None. 11. ADJOURNMENT At 9:38 p.m. Council President Goodhouse made a motion for adjournment. Councilor Newton seconded the motion. City Recorder Krager conducted a roll call vote and the motion passed unanimously. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 10 of 11 Present Absent Councilor Lueb ✓ Councilor Anderson ✓ Mayor Snider ✓ Council President Goodhouse ✓ Councilor Newton ✓ Carol A. Krager, City Recorder Attest: Jason B. Snider,Mayor Date: TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES —August 18, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 11 of 11 ligCity of Tigard City Council Business Meeting Minutes T I GARD September 8, 2020 E STUDY SESSION A. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS L Youth Councilor Calderon reported that the Tigard Youth Advisory Council did not meet due to the Labor Day Holiday. He said he will contact the designee from the Black Student Union (BSU) regarding a meeting with Mayor Snider. Mayor Snider noted he will be attending a meeting with Tualatin Mayor Bubenik along with the presidents and vice presidents of Tigard and Tualatin High Black Student Unions tomorrow night. Councilor Lueb reported on the Water Advisory Board meeting where a Water Master Plan update was received. She said it was interesting and insightful and she looks forward to the presentation before Council. Councilor Anderson reported that a public hearing was continued at the Planning Commission regarding a River Terrace zoning change. He reported that the Chamber Government Affairs & Public Policy Committee (GAPP) came up with a creative solution to pay for the Get Moving transportation project and it was well received by Metro Councilor Dirksen and Executive Officer Peterson. It will go to the Metro Council for a vote.The original suggestion was to tax .75 percent of a person's payroll tax. The Chamber GAPP recommended starting at.60 percent and phasing it in after four years, starting in 2022. A four-year phase-in period does not hurt the bond. Mayor Snider asked if the GAPP or Chamber Board made a final recommendation and Councilor Anderson replied that unlike other chambers, they will remain neutral. Council President Goodhouse said the Tigard Transportation Advisory Committee received an update from TriMet on the SW Corridor. They also discussed the Fanno Creek Trail crossing over Scholls Ferry Road. People are asking what the signal will look like and this is yet to be decided. He said he is a Board Member of Family Promise and got them in contact with City Manager Wine. Family Promise works with homeless families and has a good success rate of getting them into permanent homes.They serve many Tigard area families and are looking for a day center location in the city. Church closures during the pandemic have added to the difficulties of serving those in need. In response to a question from Mayor Snider about the Fanno Creek Trail crossing at Scholls Ferry Road, Council President Goodhouse said details are still to be worked out and he did not know what type of signaled crossing would be put in place. Concerns were raised about yellow flashing lights not getting enough attention from drivers. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — September 8, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 1 of 8 B. EXECUTIVE SESSION At 6:41 p.m. Mayor Snider read the following citation: The Tigard City Council was entering into an Executive Session to consider the employment of a public officer, employee, staff member or individual agent under ORS 192.660(2)(a).All discussions are confidential and those present may disclose nothing from the session. Representatives of the news media are allowed to attend Executive Sessions, as provided by ORS 192.660(4),but must not disclose any information discussed. No Executive Session may be held for the purpose of taking any final action or making any final decision. Executive Sessions are closed to the public. 1. BUSINESS MEETING L A. At 7:30 p.m. Mayor Snider called the Tigard City Council and Local Contract Review Board meeting to order. B. City Recorder Krager called the roll. Present Absent Youth Councilor Calderon x Council President Goodhouse x Councilor Newton x Councilor Lueb x Councilor Anderson x Mayor Snider x C. Pledge of Allegiance—Mayor Snider asked everyone to mute their mics and join him in the Pledge of Allegiance.A flag was projected on the screen. D. Call to Council and Staff for Non-Agenda Items—Mayor Snider said there was a Non- Agenda Item to consider a contract for an interim city manager. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Snider stated that written public comments were due by 4:30 p.m. and phone-in questions will be taken via telephone for agenda item 2.C. He said the public call-in number is 503-966-4101. A. Follow-up to Previous Public Comment-None B. Summary of Written Public Comment—Mayor Snider said two individuals wrote in about food composting. Council received an email about affordable housing and transportation issues in the Tigard Triangle, and another regarding voting by mail. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — September 8, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 2 of 8 Mayor Snider asked City Manager Wine if she had any follow up on these topics. She said staff is preparing comments on Council's behalf for the correspondence regarding transportation options in the Tigard Triangle. Regarding food service composting in Tigard, City Manager Wine noted that Council has previously reviewed the waste hauler's cost of service and Council could ask them to take food service composting into account and prepare an updated cost of service study. In response to a question from Mayor Snider, City Manager Wine said Council would be asking the haulers about the kind of tradeoffs previously reviewed in the cost of service and what rate classes should be provided. She said the haulers have indicated there would be an additional cost, so if Council wants to keep the customer bill the same, there would need to be a tradeoff. Councilor Lueb said when this was discussed with Pride Disposal, they said it is something they are looking into but are awaiting a stable processing source. City Manager Wine concurred and noted that haulers are exploring this because Metro is looking for a regional solution for solid waste generally and wants to include food waste processing on the west side. She will ask the haulers to report back to Council. C. Phone-in Public Comment—There were no callers. D. Update from Police Chief McAlpine Chief McAlpine gave an update on police activities for the month of August. There was an increase for calls for service even during COVID in July and this was thought to be an anomaly.Activities did go back down by 12%in August from August 2019. There has been an increase in marijuana store burglaries in Tigard as well as in surrounding areas. There has also been an increase in burglaries of construction tools. Groups of late teen-early 20s people are continuing into Tigard checking for unlocked cars,looking for keys, change, small electronics or stealing the car for joyrides. She urged the community to lock their vehicles. She showed a slide with the number of citations for speeding through intersection. In July there were 800 citations from 72nd Avenue and 2600 in August,with 480 for Hall Boulevard, but these figures might have the tail end of July included since it takes a few days for the vendor to review before sending them to Tigard's Traffic Unit.The Traffic Unit is taxed with reviewing these citations which means they are not out patrolling. There is a need for more officers to be trained in viewing the citations. There could be as many as 300 citations to review after a weekend. She noted that a light duty officer is now helping with review. Chief McAlpine said two new officers were sworn in today, one fluent in Spanish. The city is bringing back two officers from TriMet to help fill a gap in staffing due to extended leaves. She said one of the state budget cuts,mostly due to the pandemic,was the basic law enforcement academy. The last one is scheduled for November and all others cancelled until July of 2021. That leaves the city hiring only laterally, or having to make decisions on how to onboard new officers until they can get into the academy. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — September 8, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 3 of 8 Councilor Lueb called the number of violations at the 72nd Avenue and Highway 99W intersection astonishing and asked if the assumption was that driver behavior will change once tickets start arriving in mailboxes. Chief McAlpine said the hope is they will change their behavior. She mentioned one driver that has received four tickets from the same intersection. Councilor Lueb suggested keeping an eye on this to make sure there are enough officers to not only review the tickets but also to be out on the street. Mayor Snider referred to a conversation he had with the lieutenant overseeing it and their best guess based on the high number of people travelling through that intersection was 1500 citations per month. Councilor Newton thanked Chief McAlpine for making progress on police levy hiring. She suggested there be a coordinated effort to ask the legislators for funding help for the police academy. She asked if marijuana shop burglaries were for product rather than money and Chief McAlpine said that was a safe assumption. Regarding the police academy funding she said there were other issues such as the exit of the director and the desire for an audit of basic academy classes prompted by police reform measures. She said she doubted there would be a special legislative session to consider academy funding but will keep Council informed. There may be coordinated efforts from local law enforcement agencies to assist with basic officer training. Youth Councilor Calderon thanked the officers that are required to review the high number of citations. He asked on what grounds a citation would be rejected and Chief McAlpine said primarily it would be if the driver could not be identified or if there were other abnormalities. E. Tigard Area Chamber of Commerce Update— An update will be provided at a later Council meeting this month. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: A. PROCLAIM SEPTEMBER 17-23 AS CONSTITUTION WEEK B. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD -AMENDMENT TO TIEDEMAN, KATHERINE STREET AND GRANT AVENUE CROSSWALK AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT C. LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD - CONSIDER AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR SMALL BUSINESS GRANT PROGRAM Councilor Lueb moved for approval of the Consent Agenda. Council President Goodhouse seconded the motion. City Recorder Krager conducted a roll call vote and the motion passed. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — September 8, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 4 of 8 Yes No Council President Goodhouse x Councilor Newton x Councilor Lueb x Councilor Anderson x Mayor Snider x 4. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY RELATED TO PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR THE SW 121st AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Mayor Snider noted for the record that he owns a property that could be affected by this action so he may have a conflict of interest. He requested clarification from City Attorney Rihala. She advised he could facilitate the meeting but should recuse himself from the discussion and not vote on the resolution. Engineering Project Manager Peck showed a vicinity map slide and described the project on 121st Avenue between Whistlers Loop to Tippett Place and a portion of Fonner Street. He said this safety improvement project will provide continuous sidewalks,bicycle facilities, street lighting, drainage improvements, roadway resurfacing and waterline improvements.Acquisition of 43 parcels is required in order to construct this project.Washington County is managing the project but because this is a City of Tigard road, Council needs to give their approval to allow Washington County to acquire rights of way and ancillary easements. Councilor Anderson asked about the number of properties and Engineering Project Manager Peck said there are 43 properties but there could be several easements on each property. Council President Goodhouse moved to approve Resolution No. 20-43. Councilor Anderson seconded the motion. City Recorder Krager read the number and title of the resolution and conducted a roll call vote.The motion passed with 4 yes votes and 1 abstention. Resolution No. 20-43:A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NEED TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING PUBLIC ROADWAY, UTILITY,AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO AND ALONG SW 121ST AVENUE FROM SW WHISTLERS LOOP TO SW TIPPITT PLACE AND ALONG SW FONNER STREET FROM SW 121ST AVENUE TO SW 116TH PLACE AND AUTHORIZING EMINENT DOMAIN AND IMMEDIATE POSSESSION IF NECESSARY Yes No Abstain Council President Goodhouse x Councilor Newton x Councilor Lueb x Councilor Anderson x Mayor Snider x TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — September 8, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 5 of 8 5. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING WATER REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance and Public Works Management Analyst Rico gave the staff report and a slide presentation. Finance and Information Services Director LaFrance said the item before Council is a resolution authorizing the City Manager or Finance Director to do an advance refunding of the 2012 water bonds. He said when building the Lake Owego-Tigard Water Partnership the city issued bonds in two separate issuances. In 2012, $97.7 million in bonds was issued, and in 2015, $30.8 million. Both had 30-year terms with the first ten years non-refundable. The 2012 bonds are eight years old, so staff recommends doing an advance refunding, creating escrow for the last two years and refunding the principle for years 11-30 at a lower interest rate. Management Analyst Rico discussed benefits this will provide for the water utility and its customers. Current water system debt payments are $8.4 million annually. Preliminary analysis shows this could save $1 million annually and reduce debt service by over 12 percent.Another benefit would be enhanced intergenerational equity by helping to offset the annual reserve for renewal, repair and replacement. The allocation of cost will be spread out among different generations. One way to do that is through debt issuance, so payments are spread out through the years.Another component is the asset repair and replacement reserve. Staff discussed this with Council on January 21,2020 and the first year of this reserve was included in the fiscal year 20-21 budget. The reserve amount is $1.16 million annually and it is important to save incrementally for future major repairs or replacements. As this $1.16 million gets added to the revenue requirements it will be offset by the approximately$1 million in debt service savings,which is a real benefit to the community. A final benefit is related to the water rate study. Based on the timing of the refunding, closing would occur before the end of the water rate study project in 2021-24 so it will have the most current and accurate information required for calculating rates. Mayor Snider asked for confirmation that the water rates will be as low as they can possibly be if Council takes this action. Ms. Rico said the rates will be based on revenue requirements that are needed-no more, and no less. The debt service requirements will be lower. Councilor Newton commented on the importance of funding the asset repair and replacement reserve and wanted the public to know that the city is being mindful about protecting these important assets. Councilor Lueb moved to approve Resolution No. 20-44. Council President Goodhouse seconded the motion. City Recorder Krager read the number and title of the resolution and conducted a roll call vote.The motion was approved unanimously. Resolution No. 20-44:A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TIGARD, WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON,AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF WATER SYSTEM REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS AND RELATED MATTERS TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — September 8, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 6 of 8 Yes No Council President Goodhouse x Councilor Newton x Councilor Lueb x Councilor Anderson x Mayor Snider x 6. NON-AGENDA ITEMS HR Director Bennett said Council had before them for consideration an Interim City Manager contract with current Assistant City Manager Kathy Nyland. She and City Attorney Rihala entered into negotiations with Ms. Nyland and a settlement was reached. Councilor Newton thanked Ms. Nyland for stepping up and said she looked forward to working with her. She acknowledged HR Director Bennett and City Attorney Rihala for moving through the negotiations quickly. Mayor Snider expressed his appreciation to Ms. Nyland for being willing to take this on. Assistant City Manager Nyland thanked City Manager Wine for everything she has done for the city and will continue to do through November. She thanked Council for the opportunity and said she is committed to a smooth and successful transition period. Councilor Lueb moved to approve the Interim City Manager contract and Councilor Newton seconded the motion. City Recorder Krager conducted a roll call vote and the motion passed unanimously. Yes No Council President Goodhouse x Councilor Newton x Councilor Lueb x Councilor Anderson x Mayor Snider x 7. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT City Manager Wine provided updates on several items. Eight applications have been received so far for the Public Safety Advisory Board and anyone interested has until September 16 to apply. The opportunity to serve on this board is being promoted through a variety of channels including Micro- Enterprise Systems of Oregon (MESO) and Unite Oregon. The materials are available in English and Spanish. On the pandemic front, Governor Brown extended the emergency declaration an additional 60 days. Infection rates will be closely tracked following the holiday weekend. Playgrounds are open but people must keep a physical distance of six feet if not in a close group, such as a family. TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — September 8, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 7 of 8 Council will receive an update on implementation of the Performance Audit next week which will identify steps staff will take to align the performance actions with the budget, strategic plan and the Citywide Report Card. The digital access survey will continue to remain open because is taking a little longer to get enough participation. Staff continue to meet with partners at Tigard-Tualatin School District on the topic of school resource officers.There will be a community survey, and targeted groups have been invited to facilitated conversations,with a focus on receiving input from those who are most impacted by SROs but may not be as likely to participate in a community survey or traditional city outreach. 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION: None. 9. ADJOURNMENT At 8:20 p.m. Councilor Lueb moved for adjournment. Council President Goodhouse seconded the motion and City Recorder Krager conducted a roll call vote. Mayor Snider announced that the motion passed unanimously. Yes No Council President Goodhouse x Councilor Newton x Councilor Lueb x Councilor Anderson x Mayor Snider x Carol A. Krager, City Recorder Attest: Jason B. Snider,Mayor Date: TIGARD CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES — September 8, 2020 City of Tigard 1 13125 SW Hall Blvd.,Tigard, OR 97223 www.tigard-or.gov 1 Page 8 of 8 AIS-4560 3. B. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/09/2021 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: Award of contract for the Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Wells 2 & 3 Refurbishment Prepared For: Christine Moody Submitted By: Jamie Greenberg, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda - LCRB Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board award a contract for Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Wells 2 & 3 Refurbishment to Schneider Equipment, Inc dba Schneider Water Services? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends that the Local Contract Review Board award a contract to Schneider Equipment, Inc dba Schneider Water Services in the amount of$1,273,579.00 and direct the City Manager to take the steps necessary to execute the contract. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The refurbishment of the ASR wells 2 & 3 project is part of the Water System Master Plan to expand the City's aquifer storage and recovery program to meet its long-term water demands. The City uses its aquifer storage and recovery wells as an integral part of its water supply and distribution system, supplementing drinking water supply during the peak summer demand season with water injected during the low winter demand season. The City's ASR wells also serve as a back-up water source when supply from the City's primary source is reduced. The City has already developed two ASR wells (ASR 1 and ASR 2), and third ASR well (ASR 3) was drilled and tested in 2007. ASR 1 has been production since 2001, and ASR 2 has been in production since 2006. This contract will make ASR 3 operational and will replace electrical components at ASR 2 for maintenance purposes. This project will also connect pressure zones to improve storage and distribution from ASR 3. A formal Invitation to Bid was issued in early December. Bids were due on January 6, 2021 and the City received two bids at closing: Schneider Equipment Inc, dba Schneider Water Services — $1,273,579.00 Holt Services, Inc - $1,384,517.00 Staff has reviewed the bids and determined that Schneider Equipment Inc, dba Schneider Water Services has submitted the lowest responsible bid. The company has no State of Oregon Contractor Construction Board violations and is not on the Bureau of Labor and Industries ineligible list. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may reject all bids and direct staff to evaluate and develop any alternative scopes to the project and resolicit the bids. This would extend the project timeframe, leave the city at risk of unreliable back-up water source, and may ultimately increase costs. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS Water System Master Plan DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION This is the first time the Local Contract Review Board has discussed this potential contract. Fiscal Impact Cost: $1,273,579 Budgeted (yes or no): Yes Where budgeted?: Water Fund and Water SDC Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: Capital Improvement Plan, project number 96053 funded by the Water fund and Water SDC Fund Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-4569 3. C. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/09/2021 Length (in minutes): Consent Item Agenda Title: LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD: Consider Approval of Contract Amendment #1 with DLR Group Prepared For: Nadine Robinson Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Consent Agenda - LCRB Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board approve contract amendment #1 to DLR Group to be performed on the City Facilities Consolidation (CFC) project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends the Local Contract Review Board approve contract amendment #1 to DLR Group in the amount of$150,000. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY On August 25, 2020, the city entered into a $165,000 contract with DLR Group for functional and conceptual design services for the city facilities consolidation project. The contract included the following tasks: TASK 1 — Review previous work & Enhancement to City Services — 475 hours •Understand current work environment. •Interview staff— multiple meetings per department plus reviews with city's project committee Understand location and adjacency needs. •Develop workflow analysis to understand efficiencies. •Develop workflow analysis for a centralized customer service experience. TASK 2 —Work Products — 419 hours •Updated programming. •Updated parking needs. •Updated conceptual floor plans, massing, elevations and site plans to a 10% level. • Community outreach design package. At the January 19, 2021 workshop meeting, City Council received the phase 2 feasibility report for the CFC project. Staff provided information on the work that had been completed since meeting with Council in February 2020. Included in the presentation was the above noted work completed by the DLR Group. During the presentation, the team indicated it would be seeking additional funding and a contract amendment to complete the next phase of the project. These actions include undertaking engineering and other studies on the existing public works downtown site to prepare for the reuse of that site for a new city hall and police station; and executing aspects of the CFC project financial plan, which include finalizing project cost estimates. The costing work is necessary to size a general obligation borrowing that council would be asked to consider in summer 2021. The DLR Group proposal for this work is $150,000. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may choose to not approve the contract amendment and ask staff to issue a Request for Proposals for the next phase of the work. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Council Goals Goal 1: Ensure the City's continued financial stability and sustainability while providing mandated services. Seek ways to fund and increase services valued by the community. Goal 2: Invest and connect key areas of the city to promote economic growth and community vitality. Strategy 2.1 Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment: Strategic Plan, Priority 3, Ensure development and growth support the vision. Objective 3.1 Pursue land development that maximizes public health benefits while increasing connection between people and community destinations. Objective 3.2 Focus development-associated resources in parts of the city that have the capacity to serve, house, employ, and attract the most people with the least impact on Tigard's natural systems and the climate. Objective 3.4 Proactively intervene as necessary to meet the housing needs of all community members. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION City Council received the phase two feasibility report on the CFC project on January 19, 2021. Fiscal Impact Cost: $150,000 Budgeted (yes or no): No Where Budgeted (department/program): Central Services/Facilities Additional Fiscal Notes: The Facilities Division's budget will cover the initial cost of the contract, however, a third quarter supplemental budget request will be submitted for $150.000. Attachments No file(s) attached. AIS-4501 4. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/09/2021 Length (in minutes): 30 Minutes Agenda Title: Public Hearing for City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Ordinance Meeting Type: Council Public Hearing - Business Informational Meeting - Main Public Hearing Yes Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Public Hearing for City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends that City Council: 1. Review and discuss the proposed Substantial Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan 2. Take testimony on the Plan Amendment 3. Vote to adopt Plan Amendment by non-emergency Ordinance 4. Direct staff to prepare a Ballot Title for the May 2021 election pursuant to Section XII.A.1 of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan that requires voter approval of Substantial Amendments increasing the maximum amount of indebtedness. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY At the direction of the Town Center Development Agency Board, staff worked with consultants to prepare a draft Substantial Amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan ("Plan Amendment") to increase the maximum indebtedness and add projects to the City Center Urban Renewal Area ("Area"). On December 15, 2020, the Town Center Development Agency initiated public review of the proposed Plan Amendment. Project Background Over the past fifteen years, community and City leaders have pursued a dedicated course of incremental improvements through public and private investment in Downtown Tigard. Completed and on-going investments in streets, parks, and trails have improved the public realm, while public/private development projects have brought hundreds of new residents to the downtown and improved the business district. The City of Tigard adopted the City Center Urban Renewal Plan ("CCURP") or Tax Increment Financing ("TIF") Plan, in 2006 with an active period of 20 years specified in the plan. The maximum indebtedness to undertake plan projects is $22M. After FY 2026, future debt cannot be incurred, thus the CCURP would not be able to undertake new projects. However, the tax increment revenue would continue to be collected until the existing debt is retired. The CCURP was amended in 2017 to extend the district boundary, but no changes were made to the plan duration or the maximum indebtedness. Goal 2 of the Tigard City Council for 2019-21 is "Invest and connect key areas of the city to promote economic growth and community vitality." Strategy 2.2 under this goal is to "Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment." One of the tasks to implement this strategy is: •Evaluate the size and scope of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to determine whether tax increment resources in the downtown are sufficient to meet council objectives. Prepare recommendations regarding the City Center urban renewal area's possible continuation. To address the Council goal, the agency commissioned the "City Center Futures" project in 2020. As part of that project, three alternatives were considered for extending the City Center Urban Renewal (TIF) District. The recommended option was to pursue a substantial amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to increase the maximum indebtedness ("MI") with the existing Urban Renewal Area ("URA") boundaries. In August 2020, the Town Center Development Agency Board agreed with the recommendation and directed staff to prepare a substantial amendment for public review. Summary of Proposal The Substantial Amendment proposes an increase in Maximum Indebtedness. MI is the total amount of funds that may be spent on programs, projects, and administration over the life of a URA. MI does not include interest paid on debt. The original and current MI for the Tigard URA is $22 million. The City proposes to increase the MI by $20.8 million, bringing the total MI to $42.8 million The new MI would contribute funding to the following projects: • Construction of new streets to provide connectivity •Tigard Heritage Trail continuation •Fanno Creek Trail improvements •Universal Plaza Phase 2 •Parking facility •Affordable housing and mixed-use development assistance •Pedestrian safety and streetscape improvements •Property acquisition The proposed URA plan amendment would also extend the last day to issue debt from the 20th anniversary to the 29th anniversary of the TIF Plan. Tax increment revenues after the 29th anniversary (FY 2034-35) will be spent solely on retiring debt. The impact of tax increment financing on overlapping taxing districts, including the City of Tigard, is shown in the Report Accompanying the Plan. Revenue Sharing comes into effect when a substantial amendment to increase maximum indebtedness is approved. Revenue sharing means that, at thresholds defined in ORS 457.470, the impacted taxing jurisdictions will receive a share of the incremental growth in the District. The first threshold is 10 percent of the original maximum indebtedness ($2,200,000). At the percent threshold, the Agency will receive the full 10 percent of the initial maximum indebtedness plus 25 percent of the increment above the 10 percent threshold and the taxing jurisdictions will receive 75 percent of the increment above the 10 percent threshold. Revenue sharing targets are projected to be reached in FYE 2036. If assessed value in the Area grows more quickly than projected, the revenue sharing triggers could be reached earlier. Under the substantial amendment as proposed, revenue sharing is proposed to take effect in FY 2035-36. This level of MI increase cannot be approved by the City alone; it must also be approved through adoption of a resolution by the governing bodies of the taxing districts that levy 75 percent of the permanent rate taxes in the URA. Staff anticipates receiving resolutions of support from Tigard Tualatin School District, Washington County, and Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue. With tonight's action, staff hopes to secure support from the City of Tigard as well. The draft Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Plan Amendment ("Plan Amendment") and the Report Accompanying the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment ("Report") are included as attachments. The Plan Amendment shows the verbiage changes to the existing urban renewal plan, including new specific projects and updates to project descriptions. The Report gives technical information on the District's blighting conditions as well as the financial feasibility of the MI increase. Public Notice A notice for this meeting was sent to registered voters in Tigard on January 19, 2021 and was placed on the City of Tigard website. Process The process for approval has included the following steps, in accordance with ORS 457: 1. The Plan Amendment was reviewed by the Town Center Advisory Commission at the September, October, and November 2020 meetings. The TCAC recommended approval at its December 9, 2020 meeting. 2. On December 15, 2020 the Tigard City Center Development Agency reviewed the proposed Plan Amendment and accompanying Report and initiated public review. 3. The Tigard Planning Commission reviewed the Plan Amendment on January 4, 2021 and voted unanimously that the Plan Amendment conformed to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, recommending that the City Council adopt the Plan Amendment and accompanying Report. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are attached hereto as Exhibit C. 4. Notice of the Council public hearing was provided by mailing to all registered voters on January 19, 2021. 5. A letter with the proposed Plan Amendment and the Report was sent to the governing body of each affected taxing district on December 16, 2020. 6. The Plan Amendment was presented to the Washington County Board of Commissioners on January 12 and 26, 2021. 7. The Agency gave presentations to the Boards of Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue and Tigard-Tualatin School District on the proposed amendment and requested that the districts adopt resolutions approving the MI increase. The Agency also gave an informational presentation to the Tigard Tualatin Aquatic District. 8. The hearing by City Council and adoption of the proposed Plan Amendment and accompanying Report by a non-emergency ordinance will be held on February 9, 2021 and the Council vote on the ordinance will be on the same date. 9. Section XII.A.1 of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan requires voter approval of Substantial Amendments increasing the maximum amount of indebtedness. The ordinance would be referred to the Tigard voters at the May 18, 2021 election. Ordinance Adopting the Plan Amendment The ordinance adopting the Plan Amendment requires the City Council make certain findings, which are listed in Section 1 of the ordinance. These findings are based on various documents and events. The findings are as follows: 1. The process for the adoption of the proposed Plan Amendment, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and by this reference incorporated herein, has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes; As described in Section IV above, the City has followed the procedures as outlined by ORS 457. 2. The area designated in the Plan Amendment as the Area is blighted, as defined by ORS 457.010(1) and is eligible for inclusion within the Plan Amendment because of conditions described in Section II of the Report including inadequate streets, trails, sidewalks, parks, and utilities, and a prevalence of depreciated values resulting from underdevelopment and underutilization of property within the Area; This is the basicjustification for the Plan Amendment and the Council's finding is meant to make that justification explicit. 3. The rehabilitation and redevelopment described in the Plan Amendment to be undertaken by the Agency is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the City because absent the completion of the urban renewal projects, the Area will fail to contribute its fair share of property tax revenues to support City services and will fail to develop or redevelop according to the goals of the comprehensive plan; This finding states the public purpose of the Plan Amendment, which is for the property in the Area to develop and redevelop according to the Comprehensive Plan. Property which is not developed or not fully developed and occupied does not contribute as much properly taxes as fully developedproperty. The improvement of property inthe Area will add to the tax base in the Area and further support additional economic activity in the Area. 4. The Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as a whole, and provides an outline for accomplishing the projects described in the Plan Amendment, as more fully described in Section VI of the Plan Amendment; This finding is supported by Section VI of the Plan Amendment and the Planning Commission's conclusion that the Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. The minutes of the Planning Commission meeting are attached hereto as Exhibit C. 5. In connection with any residential displacement occurring as a result of the acquisition and disposition of land, provision has been made for displaced persons in the Relocation Section of the Report as required under applicable state and federal law; The Plan Amendment does not contemplate acquisition ofpropery that would displace residents or businesses. Should the Plan Amendment be amended to include such acquisition, the Agency would be obligated to provide relocation assistance. 6. The acquisition of real property provided for in the Plan is necessary for the development of infrastructure improvements including parking improvements in the Area, for the development of public spaces, and for assisting in private redevelopment of the Area; The Plan authorizes acquisition of real proper0 for infrastructure improvements. One property is specifically identified for acquisition in this Plan Amendment. 7. Adoption and carrying out the Plan Amendment is economically sound and feasible in that funds are available to complete the Plan Amendment projects using urban renewal tax increment revenues derived from a division of taxes pursuant to section 1 c, Article IX of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 457.440, and other available funding as shown in Sections V, VI, VII, and VIII of the Report; The Report contains information on the projected revenues andprojected expenditures under the Plan Amendment and supports a finding that the Plan Amendment is economically sound and feasible. 8. The City of Tigard shall assume and complete activities prescribed to it by the Plan Amendment; The Plan Amendment does not prescribe any specific activities to the City. 9. The Agency consulted and conferred with affected overlapping taxing districts prior to the Plan Amendment being forwarded to the City Council. The Agency sent a copy of the Plan Amendment and the Report to the affected overlapping taxing districts on December 16, 2020. These taxing districts included the City of Tigard, Tigard Tualatin School District, Northwest Regional Education Service District, Portland Community College, Port of Portland, Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue, Metro, Washington County, and the Tigard Tualatin Aquatic District. The letter included an invitation to provide comments in writing on the Plan Amendment and Report on the Amendment. To date, the City has not received written recommendations from the affected taxing districts. If such recommendations are received, the Council will be required to "accept, reject or mod?ft"the recommendations and language to that effect will be added to the ordinance for its second reading and adoption 10.The Agency gave presentations to the Boards of Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue, and Tigard-Tualatin School District on the proposed amendment and requested that the districts adopt resolutions approving the MI increase. The City Council has received or anticipates receiving concurrence for the maximum indebtedness increase via adopted resolutions from Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire &Rescue and the Tigard-Tualatin School District. The ordinance also calls for publication of a notice that the Council has adopted the ordinance, for the recording of the Plan Amendment by the Washington County Clerk, and for transmitting the Plan Amendment to the Washington County Assessor. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council has four decision-making options: 1. Adopt the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment as currently proposed; 2. Adopt the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment with minor revisions read into the record; 3. Direct staff to make substantial changes to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment and continue the public hearing to February 16 for final review and approval; or 4. Do not adopt the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS 2019-2021 Tigard City Council Goals Strategy 2.2 Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment: Evaluate the size and scope of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to determine whether tax increment resources in the downtown are sufficient to meet council objectives. Prepare recommendations regarding the City Center urban renewal area's possible continuation. City Center Urban Renewal Plan Tigard Comprehensive Plan Special Planning Areas- Downtown Goal 15.2 Facilitate the development of an urban village City Strategic Plan 2020-2025 Priority 3 — Ensure development advances the vision DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION December 15, 2020- TCDA Board initiation of public review of City Center Substantial Amendment October 20, 2020 - City Center Substantial Amendment Update August 18, 2020 - City Center Futures Update Fiscal Impact Cost: $6,284,384 Budgeted (yes or no): no Where Budgeted (department/program): If approved, funds would be budgeted in the TCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: Impact of original MI from FY 2019-20 through FY 2035-36: ($4,650,313) Impact of new MI from FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49: ($6,284,384) Total Impact (original and new): ($10,934,697) Estimated Revenue Sharing: FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49: $4,215,949 The impact to the City of Tigard due to the proposed amendment's increased MI is $6,284,384 which reflects the $4,215,949 in revenue sharing which runs FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49. This amount is balanced against the future incremental tax revenues receivable upon district expiration. After the district is closed down, tax revenue to the City of Tigard will be greater than would have been otherwise collected in the absence of the urban renewal investments. Attachments Ordinance Exhibit A -Plan Amendment Exhibit B- Report Accompanying the Plan Exhibit C- Planning Commission Minutes Presentation CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 21- AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND FINDINGS RELATING TO AND APPROVING THE TIGARD CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND DIRECTING THAT NOTICE OF APPROVAL BE PUBLISHED WHEREAS,the Tigard City Center Development Agency (the "Agency"), as the duly authorized and acting urban renewal agency of the City of Tigard, Oregon, is proposing to undertake certain urban renewal activities in a designated area within the City pursuant to ORS Chapter 457; and WHEREAS, the Agency, pursuant to the requirements of ORS Chapter 457, has caused the preparation of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Plan Amendment"). The Plan Amendment increases the maximum indebtedness and authorizes certain urban renewal activities within the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area (the "Area"); and WHEREAS, the Agency has caused the preparation of a certain Urban Renewal Report dated February 9, 2021, attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Report") to accompany the Plan Amendment as required under ORS 457.085(3); and WHEREAS, the Agency forwarded the Plan Amendment and Report to the City's Planning Commission (the "Commission") for review and recommendation. The Commission considered the Plan Amendment and Report on January 4, 2021, made a recommendation that the Plan Amendment conformed with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and recommended Tigard City Council ("the City Council") adopt the Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit C (the "Planning Commission Recommendation"); and WHEREAS, the Plan Amendment and the Report were forwarded on December 16, 2021 to the governing body of each taxing district affected by the Plan Amendment, and the Agency has therefore consulted and conferred with each taxing district; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021 and January 26, 2021,representatives of the City met with the Washington County Board of Commissioners to review the Plan Amendment, including proposed maximum indebtedness for the Plan Amendment; and WHERAS, representatives of the City met with the boards of the largest taxing districts: Washington County, Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, and the Tigard-Tualatin School District to request concurrence for the maximum indebtedness increase;and also briefed the Tigard Tualatin Aquatic District; and WHEREAS,the City Council has received or anticipates receiving concurrence for the maximum indebtedness increase via adopted resolutions from Washington County,Tualatin Valley Fire&Rescue and the Tigard-Tualatin School District; and WHEREAS, the City Council has not received other written recommendations from the governing bodies of the affected taxing districts; and ORDINANCE No.21- Page 1 WHEREAS,on January 19,2021 the City caused notice of the hearing to be held before the City Council on the Plan Amendment, including the required statements of ORS 457.120(3), to be mailed to registered voters within Tigard's incorporated limits; and WHEREAS,on February 9, 2021 the City Council held a public hearing to review and consider the Plan Amendment, the Report, the recommendation of the Tigard Planning Commission, and the public testimony received on or before that date and to receive additional public testimony; and WHEREAS,after consideration of the record presented through this date, the City Council does by this Ordinance desire to approve the Plan Amendment. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY OF TIGARD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Plan Amendment complies with all requirements of ORS Chapter 457 and the specific criteria of 457.095(2)(a) through (g), in that, based on the information provided in the Report, the Planning Commission Recommendation, and the public testimony before the City Council: 1. The process for the adoption of the Plan Amendment,has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 457 of the Oregon Revised Statutes; 2. The area designated in the Plan Amendment as the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area is blighted, as defined by ORS 457.010(1) and is eligible for inclusion within the Plan Amendment because of conditions described in the Report in the Section "Existing Physical, Social, and Economic Conditions and Impacts on Municipal Services",including the existence of inadequate streets, trails, sidewalks,parks, and utilities, and a prevalence of depreciated values resulting from underdevelopment and underutilization of property within the Area, ORS 457.010(1)(e) and (g); 3. The rehabilitation and redevelopment described in the Plan Amendment to be undertaken by the Agency is necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare of the City because absent the completion of urban renewal projects, the Area will fail to contribute its fair share of property tax revenues to support City services and will fail to develop or redevelop according the goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan; 4. The Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and documented ancillary documents and provides an outline for accomplishing the projects described in the Plan Amendment, as more fully described in the Plan Amendment and in the Planning Commission recommendation; 5. No residential displacement will occur as a result of the acquisition and disposition of land and redevelopment activities proposed in the Plan Amendment and therefore the Plan Amendment does not include provisions to house displaced persons; 6. The acquisition of real property provided in the Plan Amendment is necessary for the development of infrastructure improvements including parking improvements in the Area, for the development of public spaces and for assisting in private redevelopment of the Area and this property is identified in the Plan Amendment; ORDINANCE No.21- Page 2 7. Adoption and carrying out the Plan Amendment is economically sound and feasible in that eligible projects and activities will be funded by urban renewal tax revenues derived from a division of taxes pursuant to section 1c,Article IX of the Oregon Constitution and ORS 457.440 and other available funding as more fully described in the Sections V,VI,VII, and VIII of the Report; 8. The City shall assume and complete any activities prescribed it by the Plan Amendment; and 9. The Agency consulted and conferred with the affected overlapping taxing districts prior to the Plan Amendment being forwarded to the City Council. 10. The Agency gave presentations to the Boards of Washington County,Tualatin Valley Fire and Rescue and Tigard-Tualatin School District on the proposed amendment and requested that the districts adopt resolutions approving the MI increase. SECTION 2: The Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment is hereby approved based upon review and consideration by the Tigard City Council of the Plan Amendment and Report, the Tigard Planning Commission recommendations,each of which is hereby accepted,and the public testimony in the record. SECTION 3: The City Manager shall forward forthwith to the Agency a copy of this Ordinance. SECTION 4: The Agency shall thereafter cause a copy of the Plan Amendment to be recorded in the Records of Washington County, Oregon. SECTION 5: The City Manager,in accordance with ORS 457.115, shall publish notice of the adoption of the Ordinance approving the Plan Amendment including the provisions of ORS 457.135,in The Oregonian no later than four days following adoption of this Ordinance. This ordinance shall be effective upon the Washington County Board of Commissioners'vote for concurrence on the maximum indebtedness increase and certification by the County Elections official that the ordinance has received voter approval at the election conducted on May 18,2021. PASSED: By vote of all council members present after being read by number and title only, this day of ,2021. Carol A. Krager,City Recorder APPROVED: By Tigard City Council this day of ,2021. Jason B. Snider,Mayor Approved as to form: ORDINANCE No.21- Page 3 City Attorney Date ORDINANCE No.21- Page 2 Proposed new text is shown in double-underline. Deleted text is shown in strikethrough. Explanatory language shown in italics. TIGARD CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AMENDMENT Only the proposed changes are shown, current plan can be viewed at: https://www.tigard- or.gov/urbanrenewal/ I. Introduction The Original Plan has had a duration of 20 years (see Chapter XI), meaning that no new debt w114 would be incurred after Fiscal Year 2025/2026. The maximum amount of indebtedness (amount of tax increment financing for projects and programa that may be issued for the Plan is Twenty Two Million Dollarc and No Cents ($22,000,000). The first substantial amendment was developed in 2016 and went to voters in the May 2017 election. It amended the boundary and updated the plan as needed. The second substantial amendment was developed in 2020 and went to the voters in the May 2021 election. It added proiects. increased the maximum indebtedness. and updated the plan as needed. The maximum amount of indebtedness (amount of tax increment financing for proiects and programs) that may be issued for the Plan is Forty-Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and no cents (542.800.000). No new debt will be incurred after Fiscal Year 2034/2035. II. Goals and Objectives Goal 3— Downtown's transportation system should be multi-modal, connecting people places and activities safely and conveniently. Objectives: 3B: Concurrent with proposed street improvements, and in conformance with the Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP), provide public and private parking facilities, bike lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and other pedestrian, and bicycle facilities that promote multimodal usage, access and safety. 1 Goal 5 - Promote high quality development of retail, office and residential uses that support and are supported by public streetscape, transportation, recreation and open space investments. Objectives: 5A: Provide development incentives and technical assistance programs that encourage business and property owners to develop projects that are consistent with the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan vision, the 2019 Affordable Housing Plan. the City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025, and the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. 5C: Provide for property acquisition to support this goal. III. Outline of projects The Plan identifies transportation projects, including street improvements, streetscape improvements and bicycle/pedestrian facilities improvements, which will increase multimodal connectivity throughout the Area and make downtown Tigard a safer and more accessible destination. The Plan also includes Parks, Public Spaces and Public Facilities projects that will beautify the Area, increase neighborhood livability and provide opportunities for residents, visitors and downtown workers to participate in a wide range of community and recreational activities. Planning and Development Assistance Programs identified in the Plan will facilitate the development, redevelopment and rehabilitation of private property in the Area. The programs will encourage Area business and property owners to invest in projects that will increase the economic vitality of downtown Tigard, add affordable housing units to the Area and support the goals and objectives of the Tigard Downtown Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan. IV. Map and Legal Description of Urban Renewal Area No changes to this section V. Urban Renewal Projects Urban renewal projects authorized under the Plan, which may be undertaken by the Agency, are described below. and shown in Figures 2 to 7 To preserve and enhance the Area's natural resources, projects will be designed and implemented with consideration for ecologically sensitive areas and to minimize the impacts of development on the environment. Property acquisition may be required for these 2 projects. Further, some of the projects described herein will require participation of other public agencies. Figure 2 is replaced and Figures 5,6 and 7 are removed from the Plan. A. Street Improvements 7. Construction of New Streets Construction of new streets to provide connectivity within the Area. as identified by hash marks on Figure 2. 7 Figure 2 Downtown Connectivity Plan S SS Potential Future Streets Map 4 & 4 t cNi 1 u C crypE �a� lo QA. F Cok (�2 G sT • 9ry•�,O `f 1 ■ TIG 4 1 D ,,T IIyd t #,A) , *.x C ,:: c .. e\''''', 1/4. . 'N • k:'..,,, 0, coP6.. h' • •/ P`` \ % \ ♦ \ti % %%1 .y`k Downtown Street Character Types" Upper Hall Boulevard" 4P Main Street Green Street 411 Downtown Mixed Use 1 (Collector) -Downtown Mixed Use (Neighborhood) -Downtown Mixed Use 3(Upper Burnham) db Downtown Mixed Use (Lower Burnham) Urban Residential -Alley:Business 0 250 500 1,000 Feet C I I I I I I I 1 'Dashed lmes mdcate proposed streets -Other Streets —Hall Boulevard's currently an MOT facility [MOTs design standards may supersede these standards as tang xtii" Railroads as it tsar!ODOT facility N 3 B. Streetscape Improvements— No changes to this section. C. Bike/Pedestrian Facilities - 10.Tigard Heritage Trail (Main Street to Hall Boulevard) This proiect will increase pedestrian access and provide new recreational opportunities for residents. workers and visitors to downtown. The proiect will build a new path connecting Main Street to the existing multi-use trail that connects the Commuter Rail parking lot to Hall Boulevard. and include historical/educational installations and other amenities. 11. Fanno Creek Trail Improvements Improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail within the Area will include new trail connections. lighting. accessibility improvements. boardwalks and wavfinding. D. Parks - delete Figure 5 E. Public Spaces - delete Figure 6 2. Plazas The design and construction of public plazas that will serve as public gathering spaces is a project under the Plan. This project will encourage a broader range of active and passive recreational uses in downtown and attract more residents and visitors to the area. The Universal Plaza proiect will provide a large public space that includes a water feature. covered area. connection to Fanno Creek Trail, restrooms. and other amenities. F. Public Facilities - delete Figure 7 2. Public Parking Facilities The design and construction of new public parking facilities is a project under the Plan. As new shopping, recreational and entertainment uses, including the proposed performing arts center and public market, are established in the downtown area, new public parking facilities will be needed to accommodate the anticipated increase in parking demand. This proiect includes structured parking that would iointly serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the downtown. 4 G. Planning and Development Assistance 5. Affordable Housing Development Assistance Grants and technical assistance to encourage new regulated affordable housing, and preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing. J. Finance Fees and Plan Administration This category allows for repayment of costs associated with implementation of the Plan. including but not limited to ongoing administration and financing costs associated with issuing long-and short-term debt. relocation costs. and other administrative costs. VI. Relationship to Local Objectives A. City of Tigard Community Development Code The City of Tigard Community Development Code establishes zoning districts, which govern allowed uses and contain development standards.The Area encompasses property within the City's commercial, industrial. and parks and recreation and industrial zoning districts. According to the City's Development Code, the purpose of commercial zoning districts-is - - - - - - - --- - . :- _ _ - --- •. - .' - •- -- -: retail and office uscc -that arc conveniently accessible to motorictc, bicyolictc/and pedoVzrianc-and designed to minimize potential adverse impacts on surrounding residential neighlxrhoadc. Further, in compliance-with the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan, the commercial zoning districts arc intended to provide a wide range of employment opportuniti- . - - _ _ -• _ -- ' _ _ . - - . to implement the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan related to land use planning and economic development by: A. Ensuring that a full range of goods and services are available throughout the city so that residents can fulfill all or most of their needs within easy driving distance and, ideally, within easy walking and biking distance of their homes; B. Ensuring that a full range of economic activities and job opportunities are available throughout the city; and C. Minimizing the potential adverse impacts of commercial uses on residential uses by carefully locating and selecting the types of uses allowed in each commercial zone. The purpose of Tigard's industrial zoning districts is to provide a broad range of iftckx trial cervices and jobs within the City of Tigard that are convoniontly accessible to local residents.-implement the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan related to land use planning and economic development by: 5 A. Ensuring that a full range of economic activities and iob opportunities are available throughout the city: and B. Minimizing the potential adverse impacts of industrial uses of industrial uses on nonindustrial uses by carefully locating and selecting the types of uses allowed in each industrial zone. The purpose of Tigard's parks and recreation zoning district is to preserve and enhance publicly-owned open space and natural and improved parkland within the city. This zone is intended to serve many functions including: A. Providing opportunities for both active and passive recreational facilities to meet neighborhood. community, and regional needs; B. Providing contrast to the built environment; C. Providing opportunities to strengthen community identity. improve public health. and foster interactions between citizens; D. Providing economic development by creating a desirable public image and robust quality of life: E. Recognizing that publicly-owned parks have a special relationship to the community and are an important resource: F. Providing flexibility in the use and development of recreational facilities as the city responds to changes in demographics. program needs. and external regulatory requirements: and G. Allowing for the efficient implementation of plans and improvements to parks, recreational facilities. and open areas with appropriate reviews where compatibility issues may arise. A detailed description of commercial, industrial, and parks and recreation zoning districts within the Area and corresponding development standards are described in Section VII below. The Plan implements the public investments necessary to generate development that is consistent with Mixed-Use Central Business District, General Commercial District, Industrial Park District. and Parks and Recreation District. and Profcssional Commcrcal Di.:tricts as well r the R 4.5 Low Dcnsity Rcsidcntial ✓strict, R 12 Medium Dcn:ity Rcsidcntial Di:frict and R 25 Medium High Density District. Further, the Plan will help ensure that the Area develops efficiently, with high quality, attractive development that creates an identity and sense of place unique to downtown Tigard. 6 B. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Parks. Recreation.Trails. And Open Space The Comprehensive Plan addresses access to parks. recreation. trails. and open space that enhance the livability of a community and contributes to the well-being of its residents. Parks policies supported by the Plan include: Goal 8.1 Provide a wide variety of high quality park and open spaces for all residents, including both developed areas with facilities for active recreation and undeveloped areas for nature oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space systems. Policy 1 Tigard shall acauire. develop and maintain a diverse system of parks. trails. open space and recreational facilities that are safe. functional and accessible to all of its Population. Goal 8.2 Create a Citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road Pedestrian and bicycle trails. Policy 1 The City shall create an interconnected regional and local system of on- and off-road trails and Paths that link together neighborhoods. Parks. open spaces. maior urban activity centers and regional recreational opportunities utilizing both Public Property and easements on Private Property. The Plan includes multiple Projects that support the City's park system vision and recommendations. In particular. the Fanno Creek Park Improvements and Urban Green Spaces projects will upgrade and increase multimodal access to existing parks and open space areas and create new green space and recreational areas that will draw residents. shoppers and visitors to downtown Tigard. The Plan includes additional trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail Projects and the development of Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for residents and visitors to Tigard. C. Transportation System Plan Goals and Policies TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN—only additions are shown, all other findings remain the same. Where some of the goal and policy language is already existing, it 7 is not shown in double underline, new goal and policy information is shown in double underline. Goal 2 Transportation Efficiency— Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Policy 9 The city shall require the provision of appropriate parking in balance with other transportation modes. The Plan includes streetscape improvements and bicycle/pedestrian system improvements designed to encourage alternative modes of transportation to the automobile. By filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system, installing new bike lanes and upgrading existing bikeways to standard, the Plan will help create a complete system of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that enables pedestrians and bicyclists to commute safely and efficiently to and within downtown. The Plan includes street improvements that will address motor vehicle needs in and around downtown Tigard. Projects such as the Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard/Hunziker Realignment and Highway 99W intersection improvements will reduce congestion and improve circulation while creating a safer environment for drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists. The Plan includes trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail proiects and provides funding for the construction of new streets providing connectivity in the Area. The Plan also provides funding for a parking structure to serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the Downtown. 8 D. City of Tigard Park System Master Plan' Goal 1 Provide a wide variety of high auality bark and open spaces for all residents. including both: - Developed areas with facilities for active recreation: and - Undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space system. Goal 2 Create a Citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Goal 3 Provide Tigard residents with a broad ranee of recreational. cultural and educational activities. The Plan includes multiple oroiects that support the City's Dark system vision and recommendations. In particular. the Fanno Creek Park Improvements and Urban Green Spaces oroiects will upgrade and increase multimodal access to existing Darks and open space areas and create new green space and recreational areas that will draw residents. shoppers and visitors to downtown Tigard. The Plan includes additional trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail Droiects and the development of Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for residents and visitors to Tigard. E. Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan No changes to this section F. Affordable Housing Plan In 2019 the City of Tigard adopted the Affordable Housing Plan —Tigard Housing Strategy Implementation Plan. The purpose of the Tigard Housing Strategy Implementation Plan (THSIP) is to identify strategies and implementation steps needed to increase the supply and affordability of housing within the City of Tigard. The outcome of the oroiect will be recommendations for adoption of housing strategies and policies. including amendments to municipal and development code, to implement an Affordable Housing Plan. The THSIP identified tools to assist in the development of affordable housing. one of which was tax increment funds. There is a parks section in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as well as a Tigard Park System Master Plan. Both are included as they differ slightly in their verbiage. 9 The Plan includes a proiect category of Affordable Housing Development Assistance to provide grants and technical assistance to help encourage the development of affordable housing in the Area. G. City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025 The City of Tigard Strategic Plan was adopted by City Council on September 22, 2020. The Vision of the Plan is: Tigard: An eauitable community that is walkable. healthy. and accessible for everyone These are the strategic priorities and supporting obiectives and actions from the Strategic Plan that connect to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Strategic Priority 2. Create a well-connected. attractive. and accessible pedestrian network. 2.1 Create a well-connected pedestrian network that links all Tigard residents and businesses. 2.1 C. Identify and pursue new funding sources to build the pedestrian network. 2.1 D. Bring parks and trailheads within a 10-minute walk of every Tigard resident. 2.1 E. Expand the pedestrian network annually. 2.2 Tigard's pedestrian network is attractive accessible. safe and well-maintained. 2.2 B. Design the trail system to serve both recreational and active transportation purposes. Strategic Priority 3. Ensure development and growth support the vision. 3.1 Pursue land development that maximizes public health benefits while increasing connection between people and community destinations. 3.1 B. Locate and grow businesses to support walkability. connectivity. and accessibility for all business locations. 3.1 C. Build mixed-use development that is inclusive of housing. shopping, employment. services and integrates transportation options. 3.1 D. Fully implement the City's Complete Streets policy. 3.1 G. Invest in public spaces that equitably serve the city's diverse residents. workers. and visitors. 3.2 Focus development-associated resources in parts of the city that have the capacity to serve. house. employ and attract the most people with the least impact on Tigard's natural systems and the climate. 3.2 B. Facilitate Transit Oriented Development (TOD) that supports employment. housing. and community services. 3.3 Understand the effects of development on vulnerable Tigard residents and mitigate those impacts within proiects and over time. 3.3 C. Support a balanced. diverse mix of business sectors and employment opportunities. 3.3 D. Ensure transportation investments and improvements are providing eauitable benefits and impact to the entire population. 10 3.3 E. Advance equitable economic opportunity. 3.4 Proactively intervene as necessary to meet the housing needs of all community members. 3.4 A. Prioritize funds to support the creation and retention of affordable housing in Downtown Tigard. the Tigard Triangle and Washington Square. 3.4 D. Increase the housing mix in the city to meet the needs of smaller households. including singles. young families, and older adults. The City Center Urban Renewal Plan conforms to the City of Tigard Strategic Plan and implements many portions of the Strategic Plan. The Plan helps implement the strategic priority to "Create a well-connected and accessible pedestrian network" as proiects provide funding for increased trails and fornew streets providing connectivity in the Area. The Plan helps implement the strategic priority "Ensure development and growth supports the vision" as it includes the development of the Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for Tigard residents. In addition. the Plan provides structured parking and assistance for new mixed-use development including affordable housing development. VII. Proposed Land Uses This section is deleted in its entirety and replaced with new information. Land uses within the Area are governed by the City of Tigard Development Code. The Development Code establishes zoning districts that implement the Tigard Comprehensive Plan.The districts govern the allowed uses and contain development standards. Currently, land in thx Arca is within the Central Busincoo S�otrict(CBD), General Commercial {C G), Professional Commercial (C P), fl 1.5 Low Density Residential (R 1.9„ 11 12 Medium Density Residential (R 12) and R 25 Medium High D ruaity Residential (R 25) zoning districts. The purpose of the districts is described in the Development Code as follows: A,CwctrO l ess Dictrit "The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central laxness district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R 12 zoning district, and multi family pouring at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R 40 zoning district, arc permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities,facilities with drive up windows, medical centers, major event enter iinrrK2nt and gasoline stations, arc permitted conditionally." Most development in tho CBD is not subject tc minimu+r,etbacks. However, 20 foot front, side and r or yard setbacks arc required where a commerc$Q. Isco cJaktic-a residential zoning district. A max>m m ato coverage of Clr%:Jul ,: m'd-C,rnornI3ndscape requirement of 15% are required. With exception of buildings within 100 feet of any residential zoning districts, 11 where a 40 foot height restriction appli-, a maJeimum height of 80 feet is prescribed for development in t :_‘ CBD zone. Q General Commercial "Thc C G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uscs with a .. _ . _ - _ . ._ . .. _ - - _ _ _ -- :, - :andel :..,cos arc limited to single family residences which arc located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to acUt ontar ainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini warehousrec, u`ili:ies, heliports, mradical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally." Generally, devclrapmant in the C G zone is not subject to rrinim backs. However, 20 foot side and r ar yard setbacks arc required where the zone abutYa residential zoning district. A rryallir ucn cite coverage of C%, minimrs landscape requirement of ti%and r^raxir urs l ght limit of 15 feet arc also prescribed. C. Professional Commercial "The C P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and eorspatibh support rrarv' - , - :., _ - -- - - .' _ _ _ . - - , estaurantc, in dose proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District, residential uscxxat a minis' n' density of 32 units/net acre, i.e., equivalent to the R 40 zoning district are permitted in conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports, medical centers, religix.,u institutions and utilities arc permitted conditionally. Developments in the C P zoning district aro intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more intensive commercial and industrial areas." With the exception of property abutting a residential zoning district, where 20 foot side and rear yard setbacks arc required, minimum setbacks arc not required in the C P Zone. A rrxu(imum sits coverage of 3%, minimum landscape requirement of ti%and rrxmimum la-e+ght limit of 15 feet are required of all development in the C P zone. "The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single family homes with or without accessory residential units-at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single Tamil units-aro permitted conditionally. Some civic and inetitutional useciare also permitted conditionally." The minimum lot sine in the Il 1.S zone ranges from 7,500 square feet for detached housing units to 10,000 for duplexes. The average minimum lot width is 50 feet for detached unit lots and 90 feet for duplex lots. All residential develcpmont is subject to a maximum height of 30 feet an I n mum act scks of 20 feet (front yard), 5 feet(side yard) and 15 feet (r ar yard). A minimum distance of 20 feet between a property line and the front of a _arage is 12 also required.The Fl 1.5 zone dooc not impaso a nninin n Icndscapc req.-irornant or lot coverage standard. • 1 I .. ■ . . _ _ • _ • '. . "Thc R 12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing typos eta nsinimrs lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and iry. tstutonal uses arc also permitted conditiorfally Multiple family dwv ling einitc in the R 12 zone arc subject tic rnimuns front and r ar yard setbacks of 20 feet and a rna.14..7slide yard setback of 10 feet. Single family dwelling units arc subjeot to minimum front and r or yard set oaks of 14 feet and a rsinimrs ide yard setback of 5 feet. For both multplo family and single family dwelling anitsya 30400t cotbaak is required for a side or r ar yard abutting a more restrictive zoning district. A r~'axim building height of 35 feet, maximum lot coverage of 80%and nsinimrs landscape requirement of 20%arc also specified. F. R 24 Medium High Density Residrntial C'istrict "The Il 25 zoning district is designed to accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single family and multi family housing units-at a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet. A limited arx unt of neighborhood commercial uses is permitted outr ght and a wide range of civic and institutional uses arc permitted conditionally." A minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet per unit for detached single family dwelling units and 6,100 square feet or 3,050 square feet per unit for duplexes is required in the R 25 zone. Multiple family dwelling units aro subject to minis'ns front and rear yard setbacks of 20 feet and a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet. Single family dwelling units-are subject to minimum front and rear yard setbacks of 14 feet and a minimum cede yard setback of 5 feet. For both multiple family and single family dwelling units,a 30 foot setback is required for a side or rear yard abutting a more restrictive zoning district. A rmitimum building height of 45 feot, maximum lot coverage of 80% and minimum landscape requirement of 20%arc also specified. General/Commercial CG -The C-G zone is designed to accommodate a full range of retail. office. and civic uses with a citywide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming. residential uses are limited to mixed-use developments.A wide range of uses. including but not limited to adult entertainment. automotive eauioment repair and storage. mini-warehouses. utilities. heliports. medical centers. maior event entertainment. and gasoline stations. are allowed conditionally. Mixed Use Central Business District U-CBD-The MU-CBD zone is designed to provide a pedestrian-friendly urban village in downtown Tigard. A wide variety of commercial. civic. employment. mixed-use. apartments. and rowhouses are allowed. 13 Industrial Park I-P - The I-P zone provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing. office. and small-scale commercial uses. such as restaurants. personal services. and fitness centers. in a campus-like setting with no nuisance characteristics such as noise. glare. odor. or vibration. Parks and Recreation Zone PR -The Parks and Recreation (PR) zone is applicable to all city-owned lands intended as parks. open space. and recreational facilities and may be applied within all comprehensive plan designations. City-owned parks. open space. and recreational facilities located in a plan district may retain or receive other than a PR zone designation if it better furthers the goals of the plan district. In addition. other public agencies may reauest a PR zone designation for areas that meet the purpose of the zone. VIII. Property Acquisition and Disposition Tri Met property - tax lot numbers 2S102AA04800 and 2S102AA04801 IX. Relocation Methods No changes to this section X. Tax Increment Financing of Plan The maximum amount of indebtedness that may be issued or incurred under the Plan, based upon good faith estimates of the scope and costs of projects in the Plan and the schedule for their completion is Twenty Two Million Dolkira and No Cents ($22,000,000). Forty-Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and No Cents (S42.800.000).This amount is the principal of such indebtedness and does not include interest or indebtedness incurred to refund or refinance existing indebtedness. XI. Duration of Plan No new indebtedness to be repaid with tax increment revenues may be incurred after the twentieth anniversary twenty-ninth anniversary of the effective date of the Plan. As is common practice in urban renewal plans in Oregon,tax increment revenues may continue to be collected beyond this date. Collection may continue until it is found that deposits in the Commission's debt service fund are sufficient to fully pay principal and interest on indebtedness issued during the twenty years following the effective date of the Plan, either through direct payment of the indebtedness or by payment of principal and interest on bonds or notes issued to finance the indebtedness.Tax increment revenues collected after the twentieth twenty-ninth anniversary of the Plan (FY 2034/20351 may only be used to retire outstanding debt.The Plan will be effective on the date that the County certifies the results of the election at which the Tigard voters approve the measure that referred an ordinance approving an urban renewal plan to the Tigard voters. 14 XII. Future Amendments to Plan No changes to this section 15 Report Accompanying the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Reviewed by the City of Tigard February 9, 2021 Ordinance No. To be sent to vote May 17, 2021 Consultant Team Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC Elaine Howard Scott Vanden Bos Tiberius Solutions LLC Nick Popenuk Ali Danko Rob Wyman 111 = IDATIGARD TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 4 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES 6 III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN 16 IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA 16 V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS 19 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT 20 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED 24 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN 29 IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 34 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA 42 XI. RELOCATION REPORT 42 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment I. INTRODUCTION The Report on the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment (Report) contains background information and project details that pertain to the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan (Plan) Amendment (Amendment). The Report is not a legal part of the Plan, but is intended to provide public information and support the findings made by the City Council as part of the approval of the Plan. The Report provides the analysis required to meet the standards of ORS 457.087, including financial feasibility. The format of the Report is based on this statute. The Report documents not only the proposed projects in the Plan, but also documents the existing conditions in the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area (Area). The Report provides only guidance on how the Plan might be implemented. As the Tigard City Center Development TCDA (TCDA) conducts its annual budget process each year, it has the authority to make adjustments to the assumptions in this Report, particularly in regard to forecast revenues and planned expenditures. The TCDA may allocate budgets differently, adjust the timing of the projects, decide to incur debt at different timeframes than projected in this Report, and make other changes, as allowed in the amendments section of the Plan. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 4 Figure 1—Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Area rQ a ■■0.■9♦♦♦ ♦♦ aa • • s a X, i 1 a w 1 — .♦ 20 D. ♦♦ ♦N d5\cw -73 ♦ •♦♦+ 0 aP ♦♦i ' ♦•'♦ ♦ • %♦♦ ♦ •• • .im :•• i♦A'� ♦♦ ♦` •• ♦♦ ;' i ♦• • c3'' it ■ •♦♦ i U. eS`a�� i • INV c; i 41. _♦♦ ♦• .N♦ • t♦i " S• �1 n 4 ♦ ■ 2jk i• `sGG � Qrii'd El♦. 4Clj, ■ ■ A♦♦ dm St•♦ i ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ■ IL■■ ■ M A■■■. ■ ■ Tigard City Center URA 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet I I I I Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard City Center Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 5 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES This section of the Report describes existing conditions within the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area and the Amendment Area and documents the occurrence of"blighted areas," as defined by ORS 457.010(1). A. Physical Conditions The analysis in this section uses data from Washington County Assessor's office from 2016, when the amendment to increase acreage within the City Center Urban Renewal Area boundary was completed. There are not significant changes between 2016 and 2020. 1. Land Use The Tigard City Center Area is 228.96 acres, including 198 tax lots consisting of 185.60 acres and 43.36 acres of right of way. An analysis of property classification data for FYE 2016, from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation was used to determine the land use designation of tax lots in the Area as amended. By acreage, commercial use accounts for the largest land use within the area (51.51%). This is followed by exempt (28.11%) and multifamily residential (11.73%). The total land uses of the Area, by acreage and parcel, are shown in Table 1. Table 1— Existing Land Use of Area Land Use Total Total Percent Tax lots Acres of Acres Commercial 125 95.61 51.51% Exempt 30 52.18 28.11% Industrial 1 6.41 3.45% Multi-family Residential 11 21.78 11.73% Single Family Residential 18 5.45 2.94% Vacant 13 4.17 2.25% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 6 2. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations As illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 2—Area Zoning DesignationsFigure 2, the majority (67.56%) of the Area by acreage is zoned as Mixed Use Central Business District. Table 2— Existing Zoning Designations of Area Total Total Percent Zoning Tax lots Acres of Acres Mixed Use Central Business District (MU CBD) 187 125.40 67.56% MU CBD- Planned Development Overlay 1 15.1 8.14% General Commercial 5 21.61 11.64% Parks and Recreation 4 22.50 12.12% Industrial Park 1 0.99 0.53% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) and Metro RLIS 2016 Q1. As illustrated in Table 3 and Figure 3, 67.47% of the acreage is designated as Mixed Use Central Business District in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Table 3— Existing Comprehensive Plan Designations of Area Comprehensive Plan Designation Total Total Percent Tax lots Acres of Acres Mixed Use Central Business District 180 125.22 67.47% General Commercial 5 21.61 11.64% Open Space 12 37.78 20.36% Light Industrial 1 0.99 0.53% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) and Metro RLIS 2016 Q1. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 7 Figure 2—Area Zoning Designations Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Zoning Designations 11::::—..-m-H H° ISL :L� 1■V f : d. ��17 �♦ I\ ___ 0 ak T1* %FM. • 444‘ 4i* , i ii, , 411114,401F. 4,0"„Aga ,.,, . ..... 4,-., ...,. ,„,,. 4,,,,,.. sv-.. •� �?�S RA „Il �itt:t*ij - - . ak 4 ''.. #/ iiiiPo. S-- .•# V*4" 1 1 41. 1 \*** 4 • . ‘ .#* 74 1.111111111 1 • >4 i I I 14 # V •4 43 lim 2-4Y-••.*A\ \ . . Zoning ■ • „e • •. +o. ~` 1111 Mixed Use CBD- ■ ■ Planned Development ■■ a M Mixed Use CBD General Commercial Industrial Park Parks and Recreation • • D i ' t1i,limp ■ ■ City Center URA __ _ Miami 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard City Center Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 8 Figure 3—Area Comprehensive Plan Designations Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Comprehensive Plan Designations • ■•x■S•• • • ••• • ■ 12.4 ■ .•• •# • t ;4 ..t.r......,,,,. • �L ... �� , /, �� i .v -4• .�,,�5�.�` 1 •`. i ..,_ �••• •• • •• a • ■ �• a ii r • •••••• ••• to • • •.•U..•■ . ■ ■ Comprehensive Plan r■w• 1 Mixed Use CBD General Commercial Light Industrial Open Space ■ ■ City Center URA ••••• 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard City Center Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 9 B. Infrastructure This section identifies the existing conditions in the Area to assist in establishing blight. There are projects listed in City of Tigard Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Tigard Transportation Systems Plan that identify these existing conditions. This does not mean all of these projects are included in the urban renewal plan. The specific projects to be included in the urban renewal plan are not changed by this Amendment. They are listed in Table 11. 1. Transportation The CIP identifies transportation needs within the Area. Streets and Intersections There are significant transportation needs within the Area: Table 4—Transportation Needs in the Area Name Description Time Frame Cost Estimate Ash Ave railroad Extend Ash Avenue across the railroad crossing (Burnham tracks from Burnham to Commercial Near-term $3,000,000 to Commercial Street Hall Boulevard widening, Pacific Widen to up to 4/5 lanes, depending on 1 Highway to Fanno corridor plan Near-term $2,500,000 Creek New sidewalks, new asphaltic concrete Main Street Green and the collection and treatment of Street(Phase II) stormwater runoff using low impact Near-term $4,060,500 development approaches. Source:City of Tigard Transportation Systems Plan 1 As noted in Tigard staff review of this document,the TSP update will change the project description and likely increase the cost. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 10 2. Water The CIP identifies no water needs in the Area. 3. Storm water The CIP identifies one storm water project in the Area: 94045—Commercial Street Stormwater Facility Project Need: Stormwater treatment for a large existing untreated area to meet regional stormwater regulatory permit requirements, Healthy Streams Plan goals and provide mitigation for Main Street and other future projects. Project Description: Construct a stormwater facility, or facilities, to treat stormwater runoff from up to 47 acres that discharge into Fanno Creek meeting outfall-retrofitting goals identified in the regional Healthy Streams Plan. This will be coordinated with the Main Street Green Street Phase 2 Project. Total Project Cost: $376,000 4. Sewer The CIP identifies one sanitary sewer project in the Area: 93059— Downtown Sanitary Sewer Line Project Need: TV inspection shows rehabilitation is needed to protect sanitary sewer lines in sections of Downtown Tigard. The sanitary sewer in this Area was constructed in the 1960s and after years of monthly and quarterly cleaning, the pipe walls have become thin. Project Description: The full project is both inside and outside the Area. It will rehabilitate approximately 2,360 linear feet of sanitary sewer line in Pacific Highway from Hall Boulevard to Main Street and in Main Street from Pacific Highway to Commercial Street. A cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) trenchless method will be used to minimize traffic disruption. Total Project Cost: $355,000 5. Parks and Open Space The Parks and Open Space projects are: Universal Plaza -The project will provide a large public space that can be a venue for community events and will include a water feature, covered area, connection to Fanno Creek trail, restrooms, interpretive art, and other amenities. Total Project Cost: $4,010,000 Fanno Creek Overlook-The project will provide an overlook of Fanno Creek near Main Street and a new connection to the Fanno Creek Trail. Total Project Cost: $840,000 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 11 C. Social Conditions Data from the US Census Bureau is used to identify social conditions. The geographies used by the Census Bureau to summarize data do not strictly conform to the boundary of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area. As such, the Census Bureau geographies that most closely align with the Urban Renewal Area boundary are used. The Area is situated at the intersection of seven different Census block groups, each of which extend a great distance beyond the boundary of the Area, including significant residential populations that live adjacent to, but outside of the Area. Only three of the seven overlapping Census block groups include a significant amount of residential land uses within the Area. Thus, the demographic analysis is limited to those three block groups: block groups 1 and 2 in Census Tract 307 and block group 4 in Census Tract 308.01. These block groups have a total residential population of 2,924 as depicted in Tables 5 and 6. Again, the majority of this population lives in areas adjacent to but outside of the Area. The area has 27% Latinx residents. Eighty three percent of the residents identify as White alone. Table 5— Hispanic or Latino Origin by Race in the Area Race Number Percent Not Hispanic or Latino 2,147 73% White alone 1,757 60% Black or African American alone 29 1% Asian alone 108 4% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 15 1% Two or more races 238 8% Hispanic or Latino 777 27% White alone 668 23% Asian alone 8 0% Some other race alone 65 2% Two or more races 36 1% Total 2,924 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 12 The largest age group in the area is 25 to 34 years, 18%, followed by 18 to 24 years at 15%. Table 6—Age in the Area Age Number Percent Under 5 years 184 6% 5 to 9 years 76 3% 10 to 14 years 173 6% 15 to 17 years 134 5% 18 to 24 years 429 15% 25 to 34 years 515 18% 35 to 44 years 408 14% 45 to 54 years 323 11% 55 to 64 years 369 13% 65 to 74 years 143 5% 75 to 84 years 144 5% 85 years and over 26 1% Total 2,924 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Twelve percent of the adult population in the Area has not achieved a high school diploma. Twenty-six percent of adult residents in the area have earned a bachelor's degree or higher, another 26% have some college experience without a degree, and an additional 22% have graduated from high school with no college experience. Table 7— Educational Attainment in the Area Education Number Percent Less than high school 228 12% High school graduate (includes equivalency) 428 22% Some college 499 26% Associate's degree 248 13% Bachelor's degree 395 20% Master's degree 125 6% Professional school degree - 0% Doctorate degree 5 0% Total 1,928 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 13 The majority of residents, 70%, travel less than 30 minutes to work, including those who worked at home. Table 8—Travel Time to Work in the Area Travel Time Number Percent Less than 10 minutes 301 21% 10 to 19 minutes 469 33% 20 to 29 minutes 222 16% 30 to 39 minutes 246 17% 40 to 59 minutes 87 6% 60 to 89 minutes 86 6% 90 or more minutes 8 1% Total 1,419 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 14 The majority of residents, 66%, drove alone to work. Table 9— Means of Transportation to Work in the Area Transportation Number Percent Drove alone 978 66% Carpooled 108 7% Public transportation (includes taxicab) 144 10% Motorcycle - 0% Bicycle 82 6% Walked 107 7% Other means - 0% Worked at home 60 4% Total 1,479 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates D. Economic Conditions 1. Taxable Value of Property within the Area The estimated total assessed value of the Area calculated with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation for FYE 2020, including all real, personal, manufactured, and utility properties, is $168,286,420. 2. Building to Land Value Ratio An analysis of property values can be used to evaluate the economic condition of real estate investments in a given area. The relationship of a property's improvement value (the value of buildings and other improvements to the property) to its land value is generally an accurate indicator of the condition of real estate investments. This relationship is referred to as the "Improvement to Land Value Ratio," or "I:L." The values used are real market values. In urban renewal areas, the I:L is often used to measure the intensity of development or the extent to which an area has achieved its short- and long-term development objectives. Table 10 below shows the improvement to land ratios for properties within the Area. The majority of tax lots in the area that are not exempt (41.66% of the total acreage) have I:L ratios of less than 1.0. In other words, the improvements on these properties are worth less than the land they sit on. We identify a target I:L ratio of 2.0 for properties in this Area. Only 31 tax lots in the area, including 16.61% of the acreage have I:L ratios of 2.0 or more in FYE 2016. The Area as a whole, is underdeveloped and not contributing its full potential to the tax base in Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 15 Table 10— I:L Ratio of Parcels in the Area Tax lots Acres Percent of Acres Exempt 30 52.18 28.11% No Improvement Value 14 8.11 4.37% .01-.50 43 31.47 16.96% .51-.1.0 31 37.73 20.33% 1.01-1.5 25 17.77 9.57% 1.51-2.0 22 7.51 4.05% 2.01-2.5 3 2.03 1.09% 2.51-3.0 9 4.32 2.33% 3.01-4.0 13 8.26 4.45% >4.0 8 16.22 8.74% Total 198 185.6 100.00% Calculated by Tiberius Solutions LLC wit i source data from Washington County Office of Assessment and Taxation(EYE 2016). E. Impact on Municipal Services The fiscal impact of tax increment financing on taxing districts that levy taxes within the Area (affected taxing districts) is described in Section IX Impact of Tax Increment Financing of this Report. This subsection discusses the fiscal impacts resulting from potential increases in demand for municipal services. The properties within the Area are all within the city limits and future development and demand for services is anticipated in the Area. III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN The reason for selecting the Area has not changed from prior Reports; it is to enhance the ability to fund improvements necessary to cure blight within the Area. IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA The projects identified for additional funding are largely already identified in the verbiage of the Plan, but additional funding has been allocated. Following the categories in the Plan, they are shown below. 1. Construction of New Streets Construction of new streets to provide connectivity within the Area as identified by dashed lines on Figure4. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 16 Existing Conditions: The streets shown with dotted lines do not currently exist. Most block sizes in the Area are very large, which limits the amount of street frontage and limits connectivity for all modes of transportation particularly for pedestrians. Figure 4— Potential Future Streets in Area Downtown Connectivity Plan GAFF$ ,l�- Potential Future Streets Map �� cNI'i ce:41.t.......:"N's ��PaEp� Qp cp Ge -3Ta1 ,.,0 v r"/G • • • oT • • 00 ,0,,„,- P r 6 �� 'P 1 y,. i. • ;.. .• 0)' y •t • .. • • • :.. ` ••. • •ti • • • Downtown Street Character Types" db Upper Hall Boulevard" -Main Street Green Street Downtown Mixed Use 1 (Collector) -Downtown Mixed Use 2(Neighborhood) -Downtown Mixed Use 3(Upper Burnham) db Downtown Mixed Use 4(Lower Burnham) Urban Residential -Alley:Business 0 250 500 1,000 Feet C I I I I I I I 1 'Dashed Imes mdfcate proposed streets -Other Streets --Hail a auIevard is currently an ODOT facility ODOT's design standards may supersede these standards as fang ` HIHOIOx Railroads as it is an ODOT facility N Source:City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 17 2. Tigard Heritage Trail (Main Street to Hall Boulevard) This project will increase pedestrian access and provide new recreational opportunities for residents, workers, and visitors to downtown. The project will build a new path connecting Main Street to the existing multi-use trail that connects the Commuter Rail parking lot to Hall Boulevard, and include, historical/educational installations and other amenities. Existing Conditions: The Main Street to Tiedeman Avenue section of the Tigard Heritage Trail has been completed. Currently pedestrians who wish to continue on from Main Street to the multi-use path that connects to Hall Boulevard must walk through the Commuter Rail parking lot, most of which has no pedestrian path. 3. Fanno Creek Trail Improvements Improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail within the Area will include new trail connections, lighting, accessibility improvements, boardwalks, and wayfinding. Existing Conditions: The segment through the district is substandard. A new connection to the Universal plaza will be constructed. The deficiencies are: • Not designed or built to current local, regional, or state trail standard and generally too narrow to support the usage it sees today • Degraded asphalt surface (potential accessibility issues), with tree root heaving in some locations • Seasonal flooding • Lack of any lighting 4. Plazas: Universal Plaza The Universal Plaza project will provide a large public space that includes a water feature, covered area, connection to Fanno Creek trail, restrooms, and other amenities. Existing Conditions: This mostly vacant property owned by the TCDA is being used as a temporary public space. Conceptual plans for the new plaza have been completed. 5. Public Facilities: Parking Facility This project includes structured parking that would jointly serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the downtown. Existing Conditions: There is no structured parking in the Area. As uses intensify and as Universal Plaza is developed, additional traffic is anticipated in the Area. This structured parking would address that need. 6. Planning and Development Assistance: Affordable Housing Development Assistance Grants and technical assistance to encourage new regulated affordable housing and preservation of existing market affordable housing. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 18 Existing Conditions: The existing Plan allows for development assistance but does not specifically call out affordable housing. The need for the creation of affordable housing has been more widely recognized as an important component of the health of the city. The City of Tigard Affordable Housing Plan identified needs and strategies to address those needs. One of the tools to address the shortage of affordable housing is tax increment funds provided through urban renewal areas. 7. Finance Fees and Plan Administration This category allows for repayment of costs associated with implementation of the Plan, including but not limited to ongoing administration and financing costs associated with issuing long- and short-term debt, relocation costs, and other administrative costs. Existing Conditions: This Plan is being implemented by staff. To make the Plan components consistent with the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan, a specific project category is now designated to provide for the ongoing administration of the Plan. V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS The estimated allocation of funds to specific projects shown in this Report are the best estimates of future expenditures at the time of preparation of the Amendment. The TCDA will be able to review and update the allocations on an annual basis when they prepare the annual budget. Nominal dollars are year of expenditure dollars inclusive of inflation, which is assumed to be 3.0% per year. Table 11— Projects to be Completed Using Urban Renewal Area Funds Projects (nominal $) (constant 2020 $) Public Spaces $ (7,461,020) $ (6,570,000) Street Improvements $ (3,883,900) $ (3,100,000) Streetscape $ (1,087,820) $ (725,000) Ped/Bike Facilities $ (1,999,605) $ (1,350,000) Public Facilities $ (6,556,200) $ (6,000,000) Parks $ (1,739,490) $ (1,150,000) Affordable Housing Dev Assistance $ (2,880,720) $ (1,950,000) Planning and Dev. Assistance $ (1,852,693) $ (1,480,000) Property Acquisition $ (5,649,780) $ (3,900,000) Administration $ (3,018,666) $ (2,120,642) Financing Fees $ (500,000) $ (380,103) Total Expenditures $ (36,629,894) $ (28,725,745) Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 19 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT The projects will be ongoing and will be completed as directed by the TCDA. The Area is anticipated to complete all projects on or before FYE 2039 and have sufficient tax increment finance revenue to terminate the district in FYE 2049. Changes in market conditions could affect the assumed development schedule. However, the last day to incur debt, June 30, 2035, is to be set in the Plan and is part of the voter approval. Anticipated project completion dates are shown in Table 12. The TCDA may change the completion dates in their annual budgeting process or as project decisions are made in administering the urban renewal plan. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 20 Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars Resources Total FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029 Beginning Balance 4,132,306 2,264,962 805,820 927,127 97,374 209,608 410,469 158,157 128,336 Interest Earnings 77,827 20,662 11,325 4,029 4,636 487 1,048 2,052 791 642 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 7,419,761 1,339,894 319,197 393,334 132,781 211,523 304,642 157,941 269,580 388,720 Bond/Loan Proceeds 25,000,000 - - - 5,800,000 - - 4,200,000 - - Total Resources 32,497,588 5,492,862 2,595,484 1,203,183 6,864,544 309,385 515,298 4,770,462 428,527 517,699 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces (7,461,020) (1,591,000) (1,111,370) - - - - (4,418,170) - - Street Improvements (3,883,900) (1,100,000) (515,000) - - - - - - - Streetscape (1,087,820) (125,000) - - - - - - - - Ped/Bike Facilities (1,999,605) - - - - - - - (184,485) - Public Facilities (6,556,200) - - - (6,556,200) - - - - - Parks (1,739,490) - - - - - - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance (2,880,720) - - - - - - - - - Planning and Dev.Assistance (1,852,693) (330,000) (77,250) (185,658) - - - - - (95,010) Property Acquisition (5,649,780) - - - - - - - - - Administration (3,018,666) (81,900) (86,044) (90,398) (94,970) (99,777) (104,829) (110,135) (115,706) (121,561) Financing Fees (500,000) - - - (116,000) - - (84,000) - - Total Expenditures (36,629,894) (3,227,900) (1,789,664) (276,056) (6,767,170) (99,777) (104,829) (4,612,305) (300,191) (216,571) Ending Balance 2,264,962 805,820 927,127 97,374 209,608 410,469 158,157 128,336 301,128 Ending Balance/Inflation Index 2,264,962 782,350 873,906 89,114 186,235 354,066 132,448 104,347 237,707 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input rom City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 21 Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 2 Resources FYE 2030 FYE 2031 FYE 2032 FYE 2033 FYE 2034 FYE 2035 FYE 2036 FYE 2037 FYE 2038 FYE 2039 Beginning Balance 301,128 205,019 520,471 382,117 235,942 397,155 589,986 872,134 225,222 159,402 Interest Earnings 1,506 1,025 2,602 1,911 1,180 1,986 2,950 4,361 1,126 797 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 320,176 448,596 - - 315,615 469,810 450,932 491,965 535,797 581,601 Bond/Loan Proceeds 2,500,000 - - - - 12,500,000 - - - - Total Resources 3,122,810 654,640 523,073 384,028 552,737 13,368,951 1,043,867 1,368,460 762,145 741,800 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces - - - - - - - - - (340,480) Street Improvements - - - - - (2,268,900) - - - - Streetscape - - - - - - - (962,820) - - Ped/Bike Facilities - - - - - (1,815,120) - - - - Public Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Parks - - - - - (1,739,490) - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance (652,400) - - - - (1,815,120) - - (413,200) - Planning and Dev.Assistance (521,920) - - - - (642,855) - - - - Property Acquisition (1,565,760) - - - - (4,084,020) - - - - Administration (127,711) (134,169) (140,956) (148,086) (155,582) (163,460) (171,733) (180,418) (189,543) (199,135) Financing Fees (50,000) - - - - (250,000) - - - - Total Expenditures (2,917,791) (134,169) (140,956) (148,086) (155,582) (12,778,965) (171,733) (1,143,238) (602,743) (539,615) Ending Balance 205,019 520,471 382,117 235,942 397,155 589,986 872,134 225,222 159,402 202,185 Ending Balance/Inflation Index 157,126 387,284 276,056 165,492 270,449 390,048 559,778 140,352 96,444 118,765 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 22 .Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 3 FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE Resources 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 Beginning Balance 202,185 447,015 404,097 359,609 313,504 265,732 216,241 164,977 111,887 56,913 Interest Earnings 1,011 2,235 2,020 1,798 1,568 1,329 1,081 825 559 285 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 287,657 - - - - - - - - - Bond/Loan Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Total Resources 490,853 449,250 406,117 361,407 315,072 267,061 217,322 165,802 112,446 57,198 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces - - - - - - - - - - Street Improvements - - - - - - - - - - Streetscape - - - - - - - - - - Ped/Bike Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Public Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Parks - - - - - - - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance - - - - - - - - - - Planning and Dev.Assistance - - - - - - - - - - PropertyAcquisition - - - - - - - - - - Administration (43,838) (45,153) (46,508) (47,903) (49,340) (50,820) (52,345) (53,915) (55,533) (57,198) Financing Fees - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures (43,838) (45,153) (46,508) (47,903) (49,340) (50,820) (52,345) (53,915) (55,533) (57,198) Ending Balance 447,015 404,097 359,609 313,504 265,732 216,241 164,977 111,887 56,913 - Ending Balance/Inflation Index 254,927 223,740 193,307 163,616 134,643 106,376 78,793 51,881 25,621 - Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 23 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED Table 13 shows the allocation of tax increment revenues to debt service. Table 13 shows no new debt being incurred after FYE 2035, as required by the Plan. It is anticipated that the TCDA will have sufficient resources to retire all debt by FYE 2049, which would then allow the TCDA to cease collecting tax increment revenues and close down the Area. The time frame for retiring all debt for the Area is not absolute; it may vary depending on the actual terms of the indebtedness incurred and the actual tax increment revenues received. If the economy is slower, it may take longer to repay all debt; if the economy is more robust than the projections, it may take a shorter time period. The TCDA may decide to issue bonds or take on loans on a different schedule, and that will alter the financing assumptions, however the proposed Plan Amendment prohibits any new debt after FYE 2035. The maximum indebtedness of the Plan is $42,800,000 (Forty Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and no cents). The City of Tigard estimates that $10,375,574 of indebtedness has been incurred by the TCDA for the Area through the end of FYE 2020, resulting in $11,624,426 in remaining capacity from the original indebtedness for the Area. The capacity for projects, programs and administration starting in FYE 2021 is $36,629,894. The estimated amount of tax increment revenues necessary to service all debt is $52,469,918. This number is higher than the amount allocated to projects as it includes debt service payments (principal and interest) to pay for new debt and debt that was already incurred in the past, including projects that were already funded in prior fiscal years. Information on scheduled debt service payments for all existing debt was provided by the City of Tigard Finance Department. Additionally, we assume the TCDA will undertake four additional borrowings in future years to finance the costs of projects identified in the Plan. For speculative future borrowings, the amounts, timing, and terms of the debt are unknown. The assumptions used in this Report are for planning purposes only, and subject to change based on market conditions. These assumptions were developed by Tiberius Solutions LLC and informed by conversations with staff from the City of Tigard Finance Department and their financial advisor. Borrowing assumptions in later years (FYE 2030 and beyond) are more conservative than in earlier years (FYE 2021 through FYE 2029), to reflect greater financial uncertainty in later years. Specific key assumptions for the financial analysis include: • Debt Service Coverage Ratio: Payments for future indebtedness are structured so that annual tax increment revenues are projected to equal or exceed 1.1 x total annual debt service payments through FYE 2029. In FYE 2030 and thereafter, the projected minimum debt service coverage ratio increases to 1.25. • New Debt FYE 2024: Assumes principal amount of$5,800,000 with 4.0% interest rate, 30-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 24 • New Debt FYE 2027: Assumes principal amount of$4,200,000 with 4.0% interest rate, 30-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. • New Debt FYE 2030: Assumes principal amount of$2,500,000 with 4.5% interest rate, 20-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. • New Debt FYE 2035: Assumes principal amount of$12,500,000 with 4.5% interest rate, 20-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. For all of the assumed future borrowings, it is forecast that excess tax increment revenues in later years (FYE 2040 and beyond) would allow for additional principal payments, allowing for the loans to be repaid ahead of schedule. The assumptions used in this analysis present just one potential scenario for the long-term cash flow of the Area. If actual results differ from these assumptions, it could affect the ability of the TCDA to achieve these projects at these dollar amounts on this schedule. Based on these assumptions, we find the Amendment financially feasible. There is a positive fund balance shown in FYE 2932 and FYE 2033. In these years the Area's outstanding debt has a balloon payment scheduled in FYE 2034, so the Debt Service Fund needs to accumulative sufficient resources to be able to pay that oversized debt payment. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 25 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund FYE Resources Total 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 Beginning Balance - 1,085,936 - - - - - - - Interest Earnings 14,894 - 5,430 - - - - - - - TIF:Current Year 51,685,982 581,197 646,142 716,136 788,323 863,038 940,367 1,031,836 1,126,965 1,238,265 TIF:Prior Years 783,936 9,177 8,718 9,692 10,742 11,825 12,946 14,106 15,478 16,904 Total Resources 52,484,812 590,374 1,746,226 725,828 799,065 874,862 953,312 1,045,942 1,142,442 1,255,169 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (6,764,129) - - - - (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) New Debt FYE 2027 (4,614,842) - - - - - - - (242,886) (242,886) New Debt FYE 2030 (3,267,236) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2035 (13,527,860) - - - - - - - - - Series 2019A (2,332,883) - (124,746) (124,858) (124,922) (124,940) (124,910) (124,834) (124,710) (125,538) Series 2019B (5,226,787) - (281,587) (281,773) (280,809) (281,726) (281,464) (281,052) (281,491) (281,750) Early Principal Payment - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2024 (2,539,427) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2027 (2,082,879) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2030 (515,784) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2035 (4,688,785) - - - - - - - - - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (35,733,738) - (406,332) (406,630) (405,732) (742,081) (741,789) (741,300) (984,501) (985,589) Total Debt Service (45,560,613) - (406,332) (406,630) (405,732) (742,081) (741,789) (741,300) (984,501) (985,589) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.59 1.76 1.94 1.16 1.27 1.39 1.14 1.26 Transfer to Capital Improvements Fund (7,419,761) - (1,339,894) (319,197) (393,334) (132,781) (211,523) (304,642) (157,941) (269,580) Total Expenditures (52,980,374) - (1,746,226) (725,828) (799,065) (874,862) (953,312) (1,045,942) (1,142,442) (1,255,169) IEnding Balance - - - - - - - - I Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 26 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund, page 2 Resources FYE 2029 FYE 2030 FYE 2031 FYE 2032 FYE 2033 FYE 2034 FYE 2035 FYE 2036 FYE 2037 FYE 2038 Beginning Balance - - - - 583,071 1,309,840 - - - - Interest Earnings - - - - 2,915 6,549 - - - - TIF:Current Year 1,354,573 1,476,116 1,603,128 1,735,855 1,874,555 2,019,497 2,170,961 2,149,810 2,191,161 2,234,372 TIF:Prior Years 18,574 20,319 22,142 24,047 26,038 28,118 30,292 32,564 32,247 32,867 Total Resources 1,373,147 1,496,434 1,625,269 1,759,902 2,486,579 3,364,005 2,201,254 2,182,375 2,223,408 2,267,240 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) New Debt FYE 2027 (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) New Debt FYE 2030 - (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) Series 2019A (125,296) (125,007) (124,671) (125,287) (124,833) (708,331) - - - - Series 2019B (280,830) (280,760) (281,511) (281,053) (281,415) (1,569,568) - - - - Early Principal Payment - - - - - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2024 - - - - - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2027 - - - - - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2030 - - - - - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - - - - - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (984,427) (1,176,259) (1,176,673) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,048,390) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) Total Debt Service (984,427) (1,176,259) (1,176,673) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,048,390) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.38 1.25 1.36 1.48 1.59 0.66 1.25 1.24 1.27 1.29 Transfer to Capital Improvements Fund (388,720) (320,176) (448,596) - - (315,615) (469,810) (450,932) (491,965) (535,797) Total Expenditures (1,373,147) (1,496,434) (1,625,269) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,364,005) (2,201,254) (2,182,375) (2,223,408) (2,267,240) I Ending Balance - - - 583,071 1,309,840 - - - - - I Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 27 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund, page 3 FYE Resources FYE 2039 FYE 2040 FYE 2041 FYE 2042 FYE 2043 FYE 2044 FYE 2045 FYE 2046 FYE 2047 FYE 2048 2049 Beginning Balance - - - - - - - - - - - Interest Earnings - - - - - - - - - - - TIF:Current Year 2,279,528 2,326,716 2,376,028 2,427,558 2,481,407 2,537,680 2,596,484 2,657,935 2,612,500 2,612,500 35,347 TIF:Prior Years 33,516 34,193 34,901 35,640 36,413 37,221 38,065 38,947 39,869 39,188 39,188 Total Resources 2,313,044 2,360,909 2,410,928 2,463,198 2,517,821 2,574,901 2,634,550 2,696,883 2,652,369 2,651,688 74,535 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (55,838) - - - - - New Debt FYE 2027 (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) - - - - New Debt FYE 2030 (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) - -New Debt FYE 2035 (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (74,535) Series 2019A - - - - - - - - - - - Series 2019B - - - - - - - - - - - Early Principal Payment - - - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2024 - (341,809) (679,485) (731,755) (786,377) - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2027 - - - - - (1,123,034) (959,845) - - - - New Debt FYE 2030 - - - - - - (278,676) (237,108) - -New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - - (1,306,632) (1,691,417) (1,690,736) - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,451,867) (1,396,029) (1,153,142) (960,952) (960,952) (74,535) Total Debt Service (1,731,443) (2,073,252) (2,410,928) (2,463,198) (2,517,821) (2,574,901) (2,634,550) (2,696,883) (2,652,369) (2,651,688) (74,535) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.32 1.34 1.37 1.40 1.43 1.75 1.86 2.30 2.72 2.72 0.47 Transfer to URA Projects Fund (581,601) (287,657) - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures (2,313,044) (2,360,909) (2,410,928) (2,463,198) (2,517,821) (2,574,901) (2,634,550) (2,696,883) (2,652,369) (2,651,688) (74,535) Ending Balance - - - - - - - - - - - Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 28 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN The estimated tax increment revenues through FYE 2049 as shown above, are based on projections of the assessed value of development within the Area and the consolidated tax rate that will apply in the Area. The analysis assumes average annual growth in assessed value starting at 3.5% and increasing to 4.0% in FYE 2026 and 4.5% in FYE 2028. These growth rates assume both the appreciation of existing property values and new construction activity in the Area. Table 17 shows the projected incremental assessed value, tax rates, and tax increment revenues each year, adjusted for discounts, delinquencies, and compression losses. These projections of increment are the basis for the projections in Tables 12 and 13. Gross TIF is calculated by multiplying the tax rate times the excess value. The tax rate is stated per thousand dollars of assessed value, so the calculation is "tax rate times excess value divided by one thousand". The consolidated tax rate includes only permanent rate levies. Revenue sharing is part of the 2009 legislative changes to urban renewal and comes into effect when a substantial amendment to increase maximum indebtedness is approved. Revenue sharing means that, at thresholds defined in ORS 457.470, the impacted taxing jurisdictions will receive a share of the incremental growth in the District. The first threshold is 10% of the original maximum indebtedness ($2,200,000). At the 10%threshold, the Agency will receive the full 10% of the initial maximum indebtedness plus 25% of the increment above the 10% threshold and the taxing jurisdictions will receive 75% of the increment above the 10% threshold. Revenue sharing targets are projected to be reached in FYE 2036. If assessed value in the Area grows more quickly than projected, the revenue sharing triggers could be reached earlier. The second threshold is set at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness ($2,750,000). If this threshold is met, revenue for the district would be capped at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness, with all additional tax revenue being shared with affected taxing districts. This revenue sharing target is projected to be reached in FYE 2047. Projected Revenue Sharing is shown in Table 14 and specifically by taxing district in Table 15 and Table 16. The revenue sharing shown under the "shared-voluntary" column in FYE 2049 is not a result of meeting the revenue sharing triggers, but a result of reaching the maximum indebtedness the final year of the District, estimated in FYE 2049. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 29 Table 14 - Projected Revenue Sharing Gross TIF Shared - Shared - Final Gross FYE Mandatory Voluntary TIF for URA 2036 $188,874 $2,262,958 2037 $319,455 $2,306,485 2038 $455,912 $2,351,971 2039 $598,510 $2,399,503 2040 $747,525 $2,449,175 2041 $903,245 $2,501,082 2042 $1,065,972 $2,555,324 2043 $1,236,023 $2,612,008 2044 $1,413,725 $2,671,242 2045 $1,599,425 $2,733,142 2046 $1,793,480 $2,797,827 2047 $2,111,691 $2,750,000 2048 $2,394,243 $2,750,000 2049 $2,689,509 $2,712,792 $37,208 Total $17,517,592 $2,712,792 $33,177,924 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Table 15 - Projected Revenue Sharing by Taxing District -General Government Tigard Washington Port of Tualatin Valley Tualatin County SWC Tualatin Metro Portland Fire&Rescue City of Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2036 $35,215 $1,410 $1,513 $1,098 $23,888 $39,361 $1,410 $103,894 2037 $59,561 $2,384 $2,559 $1,857 $40,403 $66,574 $2,384 $175,723 2038 $85,003 $3,403 $3,652 $2,650 $57,662 $95,011 $3,403 $250,784 2039 $111,590 $4,467 $4,794 $3,479 $75,697 $124,728 $4,467 $329,222 2040 $139,374 $5,579 $5,988 $4,345 $94,544 $155,782 $5,579 $411,191 2041 $168,407 $6,741 $7,235 $5,251 $114,239 $188,233 $6,741 $496,848 2042 $198,747 $7,956 $8,539 $6,196 $134,820 $222,145 $7,956 $586,359 2043 $230,453 $9,225 $9,901 $7,185 $156,327 $257,583 $9,225 $679,899 2044 $263,585 $10,551 $11,325 $8,218 $178,802 $294,616 $10,551 $777,647 2045 $298,208 $11,937 $12,812 $9,297 $202,289 $333,315 $11,937 $879,795 2046 $334,389 $13,385 $14,367 $10,425 $226,832 $373,756 $13,385 $986,539 2047 $393,718 $15,760 $16,916 $12,275 $267,078 $440,070 $15,760 $1,161,577 2048 $446,399 $17,869 $19,179 $13,918 $302,814 $498,953 $17,869 $1,317,000 2049 $1,007,242 $40,318 $43,275 $31,404 $683,262 $1,125,823 $40,318 $2,971,642 Total $3,771,892 $150,983 $162,055 $117,599 $2,558,659 $4,215,949 $150,983 $11,128,120 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 30 Table 16 - Projected Revenue Sharing by Taxing District- Education Portland NW Tigard/Tualatin Community Regional SD College ESD Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2036 $78,142 $4,429 $2,409 $84,980 $188,874 2037 $132,167 $7,492 $4,074 $143,733 $319,455 2038 $188,623 $10,692 $5,815 $205,129 $455,912 2039 $247,619 $14,036 $7,633 $269,288 $598,510 2040 $309,270 $17,530 $9,534 $336,334 $747,525 2041 $373,696 $21,182 $11,520 $406,397 $903,245 2042 $441,020 $24,998 $13,595 $479,613 $1,065,972 2043 $511,374 $28,986 $15,764 $556,124 $1,236,023 2044 $584,894 $33,153 $18,030 $636,078 $1,413,725 2045 $661,723 $37,508 $20,399 $719,630 $1,599,425 2046 $742,009 $42,059 $22,874 $806,941 $1,793,480 2047 $873,661 $49,521 $26,932 $950,114 $2,111,691 2048 $990,560 $56,147 $30,536 $1,077,243 $2,394,243 2049 $2,235,071 $126,689 $68,900 $2,430,659 $5,402,302 Total $8,369,828 $474,422 $258,013 $9,102,264 $20,230,384 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 31 Table 17- Projected Incremental Assessed Value,Tax Rates, and Tax Increment Revenues, page 1 Assessed Value Increment Tax Increment Finance Dollars I Net Net Net FYE Total Frozen Base Used Unused Tax Rate Gross Adjustments (Current Year) (Prior Year) (Total) 2020 168,286,420 117,522,911 50,763,509 - 12.0517 611,787 (30,589) 581,197 9,177 590,374 2021 173,945,351 117,522,911 56,422,440 - 12.0546 680,150 (34,008) 646,142 8,718 654,860 2022 180,033,439 117,522,911 62,510,528 - 12.0592 753,827 (37,691) 716,136 9,692 725,828 2023 186,334,608 117,522,911 68,811,697 - 12.0592 829,814 (41,491) 788,323 10,742 799,065 2024 192,856,319 117,522,911 75,333,408 - 12.0592 908,461 (45,423) 863,038 11,825 874,862 2025 199,606,290 117,522,911 82,083,379 - 12.0592 989,860 (49,493) 940,367 12,946 953,312 2026 207,590,542 117,522,911 90,067,631 - 12.0592 1,086,144 (54,307) 1,031,836 14,106 1,045,942 2027 215,894,164 117,522,911 98,371,253 - 12.0592 1,186,279 (59,314) 1,126,965 15,478 1,142,442 2028 225,609,401 117,522,911 108,086,490 - 12.0592 1,303,437 (65,172) 1,238,265 16,904 1,255,169 2029 235,761,823 117,522,911 118,238,912 - 12.0592 1,425,867 (71,293) 1,354,573 18,574 1,373,147 2030 246,371,105 117,522,911 128,848,194 - 12.0592 1,553,806 (77,690) 1,476,116 20,319 1,496,434 2031 257,457,806 117,522,911 139,934,895 - 12.0592 1,687,503 (84,375) 1,603,128 22,142 1,625,269 2032 269,043,408 117,522,911 151,520,497 - 12.0592 1,827,216 (91,361) 1,735,855 24,047 1,759,902 2033 281,150,361 117,522,911 163,627,450 - 12.0592 1,973,216 (98,661) 1,874,555 26,038 1,900,593 2034 293,802,127 117,522,911 176,279,216 - 12.0592 2,125,786 (106,289) 2,019,497 28,118 2,047,615 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Notes:TIF is tax increment revenues Tax rates are expressed in terms of dollars per$1,000 of assessed value. Changes in total tax rates are due to increasing the Tualatin SWC rate to.0900 in FYE 2022 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 32 Table 18— Projected Incremental Assessed Value,Tax Rates, and Tax Increment Revenues, page 2 Assessed Value Increment Tax Increment Finance Dollars I Net Net Net FYE Total Frozen Base Used Unused Tax Rate Gross Adjustments (Current Year) (Prior Year) (Total) 2035 307,023,223 117,522,911 189,500,312 - 12.0592 2,285,222 (114,261) 2,170,961 30,292 2,201,254 2036 320,839,268 117,522,911 187,654,086 15,662,271 12.0592 2,262,958 (113,148) 2,149,810 32,564 2,182,375 2037 335,277,036 117,522,911 191,263,528 26,490,597 12.0592 2,306,485 (115,324) 2,191,161 32,247 2,223,408 2038 350,364,503 117,522,911 195,035,395 37,806,197 12.0592 2,351,971 (117,599) 2,234,372 32,867 2,267,240 2039 366,130,904 117,522,911 198,976,995 49,630,998 12.0592 2,399,503 (119,975) 2,279,528 33,516 2,313,044 2040 382,606,796 117,522,911 203,095,968 61,987,917 12.0592 2,449,175 (122,459) 2,326,716 34,193 2,360,909 2041 399,824,100 117,522,911 207,400,294 74,900,895 12.0592 2,501,082 (125,054) 2,376,028 34,901 2,410,928 2042 417,816,183 117,522,911 211,898,315 88,394,957 12.0592 2,555,324 (127,766) 2,427,558 35,640 2,463,198 2043 436,617,910 117,522,911 216,598,746 102,496,253 12.0592 2,612,008 (130,600) 2,481,407 36,413 2,517,821 2044 456,265,717 117,522,911 221,510,698 117,232,108 12.0592 2,671,242 (133,562) 2,537,680 37,221 2,574,901 2045 476,797,674 117,522,911 226,643,687 132,631,076 12.0592 2,733,142 (136,657) 2,596,484 38,065 2,634,550 2046 498,253,569 117,522,911 232,007,661 148,722,997 12.0592 2,797,827 (139,891) 2,657,935 38,947 2,696,883 2047 520,674,979 117,522,911 228,041,661 175,110,407 12.0592 2,750,000 (137,500) 2,612,500 39,869 2,652,369 2048 544,105,353 117,522,911 228,041,661 198,540,781 12.0592 2,750,000 (137,500) 2,612,500 39,188 2,651,688 2049 568,590,094 117,522,911 3,085,422 447,981,761 12.0592 37,208 (1,860) 35,347 39,188 74,535 Total 54,406,297 (2,720,315) 51,685,982 783,936 52,469,918 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Notes:TIF is tax increment revenues Tax rates are expressed in terms of dollars per$1,000 of assessed value. Changes in total tax rates are due to increasing the Tualatin SWC rate to.0900 in FYE 2022 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 33 IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING This section describes the impact of tax increment financing of the Amendment (increased maximum indebtedness), both until and after the indebtedness is repaid, upon all entities levying taxes upon property in the urban renewal area. The impact of tax increment financing on overlapping taxing districts consists of the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in assessed value in the Area. The projections for impacts on due to the increase in maximum indebtedness in this Amendment and are shown in Tables 19a and 19b. The impact of the Amendment on overlapping taxing districts is measured by the increase in annual tax increment revenues that would be foregone by those districts until all debt is repaid on the increased maximum indebtedness of$20,800,000. The estimated impacts of the original maximum indebtedness prior to this Amendment are shown in Tables 19c and 19d. These show incurring the full amount of original maximum indebtedness of$22 million in the original time frame of FYE 2026 and paying off all debt by FYE 2036. The estimated impacts for the full (original plus the increased) maximum indebtedness from this Amendment are shown in Tables 19e and 19f. All debt is incurred by FYE 2035 and paid off by FYE 2049. The Tigard Tualatin School District and the Northwest Regional Education Service District are not directly affected by the tax increment financing, but the amounts of their taxes divided for the urban renewal plan are shown in the following tables. Under current school funding law, property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund revenues to achieve per-student funding targets. Under this system, property taxes foregone, due to the use of tax increment financing, are substantially replaced with State School Fund revenues, as determined by a funding formula at the State level. General obligation bonds will not be impacted by this Amendment, because only bonds approved by voters prior to October 6, 2001 are affected by this Plan, and there are none remaining. Local option levies are not impacted by this Amendment. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 34 Table 19a - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Increased MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire City of Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2036 ($58,613) ($2,346) ($2,518) ($1,827) ($39,760) ($65,514) ($2,346) ($172,925) 2037 ($414,547) ($16,594) ($17,811) ($12,925) ($281,208) ($463,351) ($16,594) ($1,223,029) 2038 ($422,720) ($16,921) ($18,162) ($13,179) ($286,752) ($472,486) ($16,921) ($1,247,140) 2039 ($431,260) ($17,263) ($18,529) ($13,446) ($292,545) ($482,031) ($17,263) ($1,272,335) 2040 ($440,184) ($17,620) ($18,912) ($13,724) ($298,598) ($492,006) ($17,620) ($1,298,664) 2041 ($449,510) ($17,993) ($19,313) ($14,015) ($304,925) ($502,430) ($17,993) ($1,326,178) 2042 ($459,256) ($18,383) ($19,731) ($14,319) ($311,536) ($513,323) ($18,383) ($1,354,931) 2043 ($469,440) ($18,791) ($20,169) ($14,636) ($318,444) ($524,706) ($18,791) ($1,384,977) 2044 ($480,082) ($19,217) ($20,626) ($14,968) ($325,663) ($536,601) ($19,217) ($1,416,375) 2045 ($491,204) ($19,662) ($21,104) ($15,315) ($333,207) ($549,032) ($19,662) ($1,449,186) 2046 ($502,825) ($20,127) ($21,603) ($15,677) ($341,091) ($562,022) ($20,127) ($1,483,473) 2047 ($494,526) ($19,795) ($21,247) ($15,418) ($335,461) ($552,746) ($19,795) ($1,458,988) 2048 ($494,399) ($19,790) ($21,241) ($15,414) ($335,375) ($552,603) ($19,790) ($1,458,613) 2049 ($13,897) ($556) ($597) ($433) ($9,427) ($15,533) ($556) ($40,999) Total ($5,622,462) ($225,059) ($241,563) ($175,296) ($3,813,992) ($6,284,384) ($225,059) ($16,587,814) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 35 Table 19b- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Increased MI - Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2036 ($130,063) ($7,372) ($4,009) ($141,444) ($314,369) 2037 ($919,881) ($52,141) ($28,357) ($1,000,379) ($2,223,408) 2038 ($938,015) ($53,169) ($28,916) ($1,020,100) ($2,267,240) 2039 ($956,965) ($54,243) ($29,500) ($1,040,709) ($2,313,044) 2040 ($976,769) ($55,366) ($30,110) ($1,062,245) ($2,360,909) 2041 ($997,463) ($56,539) ($30,748) ($1,084,750) ($2,410,928) 2042 ($1,019,088) ($57,764) ($31,415) ($1,108,268) ($2,463,198) 2043 ($1,041,687) ($59,045) ($32,112) ($1,132,844) ($2,517,821) 2044 ($1,065,302) ($60,384) ($32,840) ($1,158,526) ($2,574,901) 2045 ($1,089,981) ($61,783) ($33,600) ($1,185,364) ($2,634,550) 2046 ($1,115,769) ($63,245) ($34,395) ($1,213,409) ($2,696,883) 2047 ($1,097,353) ($62,201) ($33,828) ($1,193,381) ($2,652,369) 2048 ($1,097,071) ($62,185) ($33,819) ($1,193,075) ($2,651,688) 2049 ($30,837) ($1,748) ($951) ($33,535) ($74,535) Total ($12,476,244) ($707,184) ($384,600) ($13,568,028) ($30,155,842) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 36 Table 19c- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Original MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire City of Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2020 ($110,142) ($4,041) ($4,732) ($3,434) ($74,715) ($123,109) ($4,409) ($324,582) 2021 ($122,143) ($4,639) ($5,248) ($3,808) ($82,856) ($136,523) ($4,889) ($360,106) 2022 ($135,328) ($5,417) ($5,814) ($4,219) ($91,800) ($151,260) ($5,417) ($399,256) 2023 ($148,983) ($5,964) ($6,401) ($4,645) ($101,063) ($166,523) ($5,964) ($439,542) 2024 ($163,115) ($6,529) ($7,008) ($5,086) ($110,649) ($182,319) ($6,529) ($481,235) 2025 ($177,742) ($7,115) ($7,636) ($5,542) ($120,571) ($198,667) ($7,115) ($524,388) 2026 ($195,013) ($7,806) ($8,379) ($6,080) ($132,287) ($217,971) ($7,806) ($575,341) 2027 ($213,005) ($8,526) ($9,152) ($6,641) ($144,492) ($238,081) ($8,526) ($628,423) 2028 ($234,022) ($9,368) ($10,055) ($7,296) ($158,749) ($261,573) ($9,368) ($690,430) 2029 ($256,019) ($10,248) ($11,000) ($7,982) ($173,670) ($286,160) ($10,248) ($755,327) 2030 ($279,006) ($11,168) ($11,987) ($8,699) ($189,263) ($311,852) ($11,168) ($823,143) 2031 ($303,026) ($12,130) ($13,019) ($9,448) ($205,558) ($338,701) ($12,130) ($894,011) 2032 ($328,128) ($13,134) ($14,098) ($10,230) ($222,585) ($366,758) ($13,134) ($968,069) 2033 ($354,360) ($14,184) ($15,225) ($11,048) ($240,380) ($396,078) ($14,184) ($1,045,459) 2034 ($381,771) ($15,282) ($16,402) ($11,903) ($258,974) ($426,717) ($15,282) ($1,126,331) 2035 ($410,417) ($16,428) ($17,633) ($12,796) ($278,406) ($458,734) ($16,428) ($1,210,843) 2036 ($348,284) ($13,941) ($14,964) ($10,859) ($236,258) ($389,287) ($13,941) ($1,027,533) Total ($4,160,505) ($165,921) ($178,751) ($129,715) ($2,822,274) ($4,650,313) ($166,539) ($12,274,019) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 37 Table 19d - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Original MI - Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2020 ($244,405) ($13,853) ($7,534) ($265,793) ($590,374) 2021 ($271,036) ($15,363) ($8,355) ($294,754) ($654,860) 2022 ($300,294) ($17,021) ($9,257) ($326,572) ($725,828) 2023 ($330,594) ($18,739) ($10,191) ($359,524) ($799,065) 2024 ($361,953) ($20,516) ($11,158) ($393,627) ($874,862) 2025 ($394,410) ($22,356) ($12,158) ($428,924) ($953,312) 2026 ($432,733) ($24,528) ($13,340) ($470,601) ($1,045,942) 2027 ($472,658) ($26,791) ($14,570) ($514,019) ($1,142,442) 2028 ($519,296) ($29,435) ($16,008) ($564,739) ($1,255,169) 2029 ($568,106) ($32,202) ($17,513) ($617,821) ($1,373,147) 2030 ($619,113) ($35,093) ($19,085) ($673,291) ($1,496,434) 2031 ($672,416) ($38,114) ($20,728) ($731,258) ($1,625,269) 2032 ($728,117) ($41,271) ($22,445) ($791,833) ($1,759,902) 2033 ($786,324) ($44,571) ($24,240) ($855,135) ($1,900,593) 2034 ($847,151) ($48,019) ($26,115) ($921,284) ($2,047,615) 2035 ($910,715) ($51,622) ($28,074) ($990,411) ($2,201,254) 2036 ($772,842) ($43,807) ($23,824) ($840,472) ($1,868,005) Total ($9,232,161) ($523,301) ($284,596) ($10,040,058) ($22,314,077) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 38 Table 19e- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Full Impact (Original and Increased) MI -General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue City of Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2020 ($110,142) ($4,041) ($4,732) ($3,434) ($74,715) ($123,109) ($4,409) ($324,582) 2021 ($122,143) ($4,639) ($5,248) ($3,808) ($82,856) ($136,523) ($4,889) ($360,106) 2022 ($135,328) ($5,417) ($5,814) ($4,219) ($91,800) ($151,260) ($5,417) ($399,256) 2023 ($148,983) ($5,964) ($6,401) ($4,645) ($101,063) ($166,523) ($5,964) ($439,542) 2024 ($163,115) ($6,529) ($7,008) ($5,086) ($110,649) ($182,319) ($6,529) ($481,235) 2025 ($177,742) ($7,115) ($7,636) ($5,542) ($120,571) ($198,667) ($7,115) ($524,388) 2026 ($195,013) ($7,806) ($8,379) ($6,080) ($132,287) ($217,971) ($7,806) ($575,341) 2027 ($213,005) ($8,526) ($9,152) ($6,641) ($144,492) ($238,081) ($8,526) ($628,423) 2028 ($234,022) ($9,368) ($10,055) ($7,296) ($158,749) ($261,573) ($9,368) ($690,430) 2029 ($256,019) ($10,248) ($11,000) ($7,982) ($173,670) ($286,160) ($10,248) ($755,327) 2030 ($279,006) ($11,168) ($11,987) ($8,699) ($189,263) ($311,852) ($11,168) ($823,143) 2031 ($303,026) ($12,130) ($13,019) ($9,448) ($205,558) ($338,701) ($12,130) ($894,011) 2032 ($328,128) ($13,134) ($14,098) ($10,230) ($222,585) ($366,758) ($13,134) ($968,069) 2033 ($354,360) ($14,184) ($15,225) ($11,048) ($240,380) ($396,078) ($14,184) ($1,045,459) 2034 ($381,771) ($15,282) ($16,402) ($11,903) ($258,974) ($426,717) ($15,282) ($1,126,331) 2035 ($410,417) ($16,428) ($17,633) ($12,796) ($278,406) ($458,734) ($16,428) ($1,210,843) 2036 ($406,897) ($16,287) ($17,482) ($12,686) ($276,018) ($454,800) ($16,287) ($1,200,458) 2037 ($414,547) ($16,594) ($17,811) ($12,925) ($281,208) ($463,351) ($16,594) ($1,223,029) 2038 ($422,720) ($16,921) ($18,162) ($13,179) ($286,752) ($472,486) ($16,921) ($1,247,140) 2039 ($431,260) ($17,263) ($18,529) ($13,446) ($292,545) ($482,031) ($17,263) ($1,272,335) 2040 ($440,184) ($17,620) ($18,912) ($13,724) ($298,598) ($492,006) ($17,620) ($1,298,664) 2041 ($449,510) ($17,993) ($19,313) ($14,015) ($304,925) ($502,430) ($17,993) ($1,326,178) 2042 ($459,256) ($18,383) ($19,731) ($14,319) ($311,536) ($513,323) ($18,383) ($1,354,931) 2043 ($469,440) ($18,791) ($20,169) ($14,636) ($318,444) ($524,706) ($18,791) ($1,384,977) 2044 ($480,082) ($19,217) ($20,626) ($14,968) ($325,663) ($536,601) ($19,217) ($1,416,375) 2045 ($491,204) ($19,662) ($21,104) ($15,315) ($333,207) ($549,032) ($19,662) ($1,449,186) 2046 ($502,825) ($20,127) ($21,603) ($15,677) ($341,091) ($562,022) ($20,127) ($1,483,473) 2047 ($494,526) ($19,795) ($21,247) ($15,418) ($335,461) ($552,746) ($19,795) ($1,458,988) 2048 ($494,399) ($19,790) ($21,241) ($15,414) ($335,375) ($552,603) ($19,790) ($1,458,613) 2049 ($13,897) ($556) ($597) ($433) ($9,427) ($15,533) ($556) ($40,999) Total ($9,782,967) ($390,980) ($420,314) ($305,011) ($6,636,266) ($10,934,697) ($391,597) ($28,861,832) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 39 Table 19f- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Full MI (Original and Increased)- Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2020 ($244,405) ($13,853) ($7,534) ($265,793) ($590,374) 2021 ($271,036) ($15,363) ($8,355) ($294,754) ($654,860) 2022 ($300,294) ($17,021) ($9,257) ($326,572) ($725,828) 2023 ($330,594) ($18,739) ($10,191) ($359,524) ($799,065) 2024 ($361,953) ($20,516) ($11,158) ($393,627) ($874,862) 2025 ($394,410) ($22,356) ($12,158) ($428,924) ($953,312) 2026 ($432,733) ($24,528) ($13,340) ($470,601) ($1,045,942) 2027 ($472,658) ($26,791) ($14,570) ($514,019) ($1,142,442) 2028 ($519,296) ($29,435) ($16,008) ($564,739) ($1,255,169) 2029 ($568,106) ($32,202) ($17,513) ($617,821) ($1,373,147) 2030 ($619,113) ($35,093) ($19,085) ($673,291) ($1,496,434) 2031 ($672,416) ($38,114) ($20,728) ($731,258) ($1,625,269) 2032 ($728,117) ($41,271) ($22,445) ($791,833) ($1,759,902) 2033 ($786,324) ($44,571) ($24,240) ($855,135) ($1,900,593) 2034 ($847,151) ($48,019) ($26,115) ($921,284) ($2,047,615) 2035 ($910,715) ($51,622) ($28,074) ($990,411) ($2,201,254) 2036 ($902,904) ($51,179) ($27,833) ($981,917) ($2,182,375) 2037 ($919,881) ($52,141) ($28,357) ($1,000,379) ($2,223,408) 2038 ($938,015) ($53,169) ($28,916) ($1,020,100) ($2,267,240) 2039 ($956,965) ($54,243) ($29,500) ($1,040,709) ($2,313,044) 2040 ($976,769) ($55,366) ($30,110) ($1,062,245) ($2,360,909) 2041 ($997,463) ($56,539) ($30,748) ($1,084,750) ($2,410,928) 2042 ($1,019,088) ($57,764) ($31,415) ($1,108,268) ($2,463,198) 2043 ($1,041,687) ($59,045) ($32,112) ($1,132,844) ($2,517,821) 2044 ($1,065,302) ($60,384) ($32,840) ($1,158,526) ($2,574,901) 2045 ($1,089,981) ($61,783) ($33,600) ($1,185,364) ($2,634,550) 2046 ($1,115,769) ($63,245) ($34,395) ($1,213,409) ($2,696,883) 2047 ($1,097,353) ($62,201) ($33,828) ($1,193,381) ($2,652,369) 2048 ($1,097,071) ($62,185) ($33,819) ($1,193,075) ($2,651,688) 2049 ($30,837) ($1,748) ($951) ($33,535) ($74,535) Total ($21,708,405) ($1,230,485) ($669,196) ($23,608,086) ($52,469,918) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 40 Table 20 shows the projected increased revenue to the taxing jurisdictions after tax increment proceeds are projected to be terminated. These projections are for FYE 2050. Table 20—Additional Revenues Obtained after Termination of Tax Increment Financing Tax Revenue in FYE 2050(year after termination) Tax From Frozen From Excess Taxing District Rate Base Value Total General Government Washington County 2.2484 $264,239 $1,071,708 $1,335,947 Soil and Water Conservation Tualatin 0.0900 $10,577 $42,899 $53,476 Metro 0.0966 $11,353 $46,044 $57,397 Port of Portland 0.0701 $8,239 $33,413 $41,652 Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue 1.5252 $179,246 $726,993 $906,239 City of Tigard 2.5131 $295,347 $1,197,879 $1,493,226 Tigard Tualatin Aquatic 0.0900 $10,577 $42,899 $53,476 Subtotal 6.6334 $779,578 $3,161,835 $3,941,413 Education Tigard/Tualatin School District 4.9892 $586,345 $2,378,121 $2,964,466 Portland Community College 0.2828 $33,236 $134,798 $168,034 NW Regional Education Service District 0.1538 $18,075 $73,309 $91,384 Subtotal 5.4258 $637,656 $2,586,228 $3,223,884 Total 12.0592 $1,417,234 $5,748,063 $7,165,297 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 41 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA State law limits the percentage of both a municipality's total assessed value and the total land area that can be contained in an urban renewal area at the time of its establishment to 15%for municipalities having a population of more than 50,000 according to the latest state census. Tigard's population eclipsed the 50,000 mark in 2019 as shown by the Portland State University Annual Population Report Tables. As noted below, the frozen base, including all real, personal, personal, manufactured, and utility properties in the Area, is $117,522,911. The total assessed value of the City of Tigard, minus excess value of the existing urban renewal areas is $6,954,974,807. Excess value is the assessed value created above the frozen base in the urban renewal area. The total urban renewal assessed value is 7.8% of the total assessed value of the City, minus excess value. This is below the 15% statutory limitation. The Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area contains 228.96 acres, including right-of-way, and the City of Tigard contains 8,129 acres. After accounting for the acreage in the potential Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area, 9.56 % of the City's acreage would be in an urban renewal area. This is below the 15% statutory limitation. Table 21— Urban Renewal Area Conformance with Assessed Value and Acreage Limits Assessed Value UR Excess Acreage City of Tigard $7,046,400,810 8,129 City of Tigard minus UR excess $6,954,974,807 Tigard City Center $117,522,911 $50,763,509 228.96 Tigard Triangle $424,744,405 $40,662,494 547.90 City Center Plus Tigard Triangle $542,267,316 $91,426,003 776.86 Percentage in Urban Renewal 7.8% 9.56% Source:Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting,LLC with data from City of Tigard and Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2020) XI. RELOCATION REPORT There is no relocation report required for the Plan. No specific acquisitions that would result in relocation benefits have been identified, however, there are plans to acquire land for infrastructure which may trigger relocation benefits in the future in the Area. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 42 CITY OF TIGARD PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes,January 4, 2021 Location: Members Remote via Microsoft Teams Link to virtual hearing online: httns://boxcast.ty/channel/Dvinvrar8xolrw6bwbss Call-in number for public testimony: 503-966-4101 Public testimony call-in time was between 7:15 and 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Acting President Hu called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Acting President Hu Commissioner Brook Alt. Commissioner Dick Commissioner Jackson Alt. Commissioner Miranda Commissioner Quinones Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Schuck Commissioner (K7) Tiruvallur Commissioner Watson Commissioner Whitehurst Absent: None Staff Present: Tom McGuire,Assistant Community Development Director; Doreen Laughlin, Executive Assistant; Sean Farrelly, Redevelopment Manager, Kenny Asher, Community Development Director, Nadine Robinson, Central Services Director Acting President Hu introduced and welcomed new Commissioner Craig Schuck,Alternate Commissioners Ahsha Miranda and Darlene Dick. He noted that Commissioner Schuck had served as an Alternate Commissioner the previous year, and that he was appointed to be a voting member in December of 2020. Commissioner Hu reminded the alternates that even though they are non-voting members, their comments and questions are just as valid any of the other commissioners. He encouraged them to speak up whenever the time arises. COMMUNICATIONS — Commissioner Jackson shared that he had attended the River Terrace 2.0 CAC when they met on Dec. 9 and gave a brief rundown of what they'd talked about. He shared with the commissioners a few of the statistics that he thought were a bit surprising. He noted that Tigard's vacancy rate is 1/3 of the Oregon vacancy rate — so there's January 4, 2021 Page 1 of 5 very little housing vacancy in Tigard. Another surprising statistic is that Tigard's home values are high compared to the state and even high compared to Portland. Also — for households making $55,000 a year or less — 4/5's of those households are "housing cost burdened." Commissioner Watson noted that on Dec 16 she'd attended the Washington Square Regional Center Stakeholders meeting. She noted among other things that they had reviewed a number of ideas about the importance of making connections through the area that are pedestrian friendly. CONSIDER MINUTES Acting President Hu asked if there were any additions, deletions, or corrections to the December 7, 2020 minutes; there being none,Acting President Hu declared the minutes approved as submitted. PUBLIC HEARING 7:05 p.m. CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Substantial amendment proposes an increase in Maximum Indebtedness (MI). MI is the total amount of funds that may be spent on programs, projects and administration over the life of an Urban Renewal Area (URA). MI does not include interest paid on debt. The original and current MI for the Tigard URA is $22 million. The City proposes to increase the MI by $20.8 million, bringing the total MI to $42.8 million. HEARING STATEMENTS Acting President Hu read the required statements and procedural items from the hearing guide. There were no abstentions; there were no challenges of the commissioners for bias or conflict of interest. Ex-parte contacts: None. Site visitations: All of the commissioners had visited the City Center site. STAFF REPORT/APPLICANT PRESENTATION Redevelopment Project Manager Sean Farrelly introduced himself. Sean is city staff and represents the City as the applicant. He introduced Elaine Howard who is a city consultant and urban renewal expert in Oregon. Sean went over a PowerPoint (Exhibit A). He noted that the Urban Renewal Plan has been in place since 2006 in Tigard and there was a substantial amendment in 2017 that added some acreage. They're requesting to increase the maximum indebtedness of the area by $20.8 million — and that will allow us to do additional projects. The total maximum indebtedness would then be $42.8 million. The new debt can be issued until 2036. At this point, he turned the presentation over to Elaine Howard who gave a "Crash Course" in how Urban Renewal works. (Exhibit A). She gave a primer of sorts regarding Tax increment financing. Sean then talked about some of the specific successes that had been had in the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal District since 2006. He spoke about additional projects that had been completed, as well as current active projects - and how the plan relates to the City's Comprehensive Plan. He noted that it is consistent with the Transportation Plan, Tigard Parks System Master Plan,Affordable Housing Plan, and the Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025. January 4, 2021 Page 2 of 5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Tigard Planning Commission finds, based upon the information provided in the staff report and the provided attachments, that the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment conforms with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and that the Tigard City Council adopt the proposed Plan Amendment. QUESTIONS / COMMENTS The commissioners agreed that the presentation very interesting, and that they appreciated it. Some questions were asked about the public parking garage and whether that would be owned by the City of Tigard. One commissioner found it interesting to learn how the funds flow. The suggestion was made that since the average person has no idea how this operates, this might be a good opportunity to educate people with perhaps an article in the City newsletter, or Tigard Times, or something similar. Sean replied that they're planning more education —including a short video. He told them to look for that to come out shortly. Another commissioner asked if the specific ideas and proposed projects noted were the true plan - or a commitment to do them. Sean answered that it's a list of projects —their intention is to do as many of them as they can within the available funds. He noted that some of the projects are done not just with tax increment financing, but some are done with grants. He noted that Tigard has already been successful getting grants to help kick start some of the projects. One of the commissioners noted that when he'd gone on the City website to look at the current project on the City Center Urban Renewal Plan, that there were a few broken links. He thinks other residents may want to go to that site to look at what's going on, and hopes the broken links are fixed. Sean said he would check into that and that it might be time to refresh those websites and to fix those broken links. PUBLIC TESTIMONY Acting President Hu asked if there was anyone on the line waiting to testify — there was none. TESTIMONY IN FAVOR — None TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION —None PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED DELIBERATION Acting President Hu asked that each of the commissioners give their thoughts on this. Following are some of the comments: • Commissioner Roberts thinks it's great. The connectivity improvement will help a lot, and he likes that. • Alt. Commissioner Dick concurs, and mentioned that she is hoping lights will be added to the Heritage Trail going to downtown as this moves forward. • Alt. Commissioner Miranda thinks it looks good. She likes parking structures and will have lots of questions and ideas on that in the future. • Commissioner K7 thinks it's a good thing. He believes it should have been done even sooner and believes this should move forward in this vibrant community. January 4, 2021 Page 3 of 5 • Commissioner Brook thinks it's a great plan. She still has questions about the parking and hopes there will be enough. Overall, she thinks it's a well thought out plan. • Commissioner Jackson said his thoughts are generally in alignment with the others so far as this conforming. His concerns are on the side of how does this link into other projects in the area—is that going to affect cost? Overall, he thinks it's very exciting. • Commissioner Quinones is excited for the Universal Plaza. She lives behind Fanno Creek Trail and the Burnham street access. She misses having the Farmers Market there and overall, is very excited about this project. • Commissioner Schuck likes the project. He thinks it's a good idea for that area — especially for some of the open spaces. The whole idea of tax increment financing is new to him. He'd been skeptical about how that works - so it was nice to hear how the public/private partnership can work to benefit both. He's in support of this. • Commissioner Watson finds it to be conforming in its intent. • Commissioner Whitehurst is also excited about the plan. He especially appreciates seeing the affordable housing piece. • Acting President Hu likes the plan. He's excited with the new projects in the downtown area and believes overall it conforms to the local goals. He just wishes the document would broadcast the energy conservation goals and aspirations a bit better. These types of things should be mentioned in the document. Overall, it's a great amendment and he supports it. MOTION Commissioner Watson made the following motion: "Based upon the information provided in the staff report and the provided attachments, I move that the Tigard Planning Commission find that Amendment No. 9 to the Urban Renewal Plan conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and further recommend that the Tigard City Council adopt the proposed Plan Amendment." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Roberts. VOTE All in favor, none opposed. RESULT Motion for recommended approval CARRIES 9 - 0. City Council will have this hearing on February 9. There will be a postcard in the mail and more information on the Tigard Website, Facebook pages, and Twitter. BRIEFING— City Facilities Consolidation (CFC) Project Kenny Asher introduced himself as the Community Development Director who will be making the presentation along with Nadine Robinson (Central Services Director) and Kirsten Hauge (consultant from Kearns West). Kenny told the group they're happy to make this presentation to the commission. They will be asking Council to continue to the third and final feasibility stage in a couple of weeks. He noted they're in the process now of sharing what they've learned and what they want to do as city staff. January 4, 2021 Page 4 of 5 All three presenters spoke using this PowerPoint (Exhibit B). Kirsten Hauge went over the agenda and had a short question and answer time. Nadine Robinson introduced the talk saying that this is a necessary, cost-effective solution to meet Tigard's needs now and into the future. She went over the project description and timeline —including the three different phases. She explained why they believe it's necessary (basically because the City buildings need repair to maintain safe operations.) She noted that extensive, expensive repairs are needed such as the HVAC system, sewer connections, and roof of the police department building. She said most importantly the facilities do not meet current seismic standards that will ensure the city can maintain operations and respond should there be a seismic event. She went over the project description, timeline and funding and noted they are currently in Phase 2. At this point, Kenny Asher spoke about the potential opportunities. These facilities are over 30 years old. We're out of space — especially in the Police Department. He talked about how this would improve downtown Tigard. Changing the city footprint will help with a number of things —particularly existing city properties could be redeveloped into more than 500 new apartments and expanded affordable housing options. New housing would stimulate downtown development which could lead to more shopping, dining, and housing. This could also increase walkability. He went over the community benefits such as a community room that will be available to reserve for civic meetings and events; a new parking structure that would provide additional parking for downtown visitors; and an opportunity to create new tax revenues from downtown development. He went over the long-term benefits, next steps, and upcoming activities. He ended his presentation talking about community engagement and what activities had taken place already to get the word out. OTHER BUSINESS —Election for President and Vice President of the Commission The offices of President and Vice President carry two-year terms and according to the commission by-laws, at the beginning of every odd year elections are held. The Commissioners voted to elect former Vice President Yi-Kang Hu for President, and Commissioner Nathan Jackson for Vice President. ADJOURNMENT President Hu adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Doreen Laughlin, P annuJg.ommission Secretary 7c/L...7 ATT ST: President4'i-Kang Hu January 4, 2021 Page 5 of 5 CityCenter U an Renewa P an Substantial Amendment ,...........,„....„ __.,..,,,,4_, , -_ '-'-.4'•Y-`,-..„--'_,_-',-'.—:3-1-,",-4"`_.,., }4 "-_ _ '- __ ..,,,- EXHIBIT A 'r=", 'CT— -S A _ ?— rte` "' yl7^ f ly �� 1` - • Tei'`€ 1d4 _■11� A8 ` , , _ •, _ .;�_{ I ,•, , f;iii.ek. ■ �w - . ria - i tai /��............� '= Edi 1A111111Wv Fr tinit ii ice �� odi _ �� - _ -Il- i, ,, � 1 4 P _Ow ? 'F�! 11J14 16i til,_ L L. 10114"it gistri 1 1 II-- „.„---________ -4 'cmil.44:_i_______.._„„ y I10re s j � - 4- 410414/07:--__ e. flirt% ' ..."1 � a2, — _/ i X114, NI � ,,/ / / �' ill9'�i' i� 4 :i.:J3 / / ,�. /flir{ wie. -` ! ' 1 PI , Z1tt r ii p IIN Tigard Planning Commission, January 4, 2020 TIGARD TCDA What is the Role of the Planning Commission ? • ORS 457 requires review by the Planning Commission • ORS 457 also requires the City Council find the Urban Renewal Plan in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan • Review, discuss, & ask questions • Consider finding that the Plan Amendment conforms to the Tigard Comprehensive Plan, and recommend the Plan's adoption to the Tigard City Council City Center Urban Renewal Area .4,, 04 ••• 0'pd 4 0 •a•4 ► .) 44 s • 0 a • a 1111 + •a► g. *a �+ a• H w •r X • �•►• ►•'11.. gt ••61, • a}I:�Raa� f a waaf a•»•• 4 i• • •S + ■ 4 ice• —• 'may • 44 re s • % • • SlAv 46... ��*,4 • y v,.•• 1y ■ d 4.4 8 • •, 4 4"+t Stt• II. •...04 %.* . ■ �« ■ •.1 ■ 4 ■ • tf a•.M-0f •Pe ■ 11 S•■ r■ w =■■■: Tigard CityCeiter URA a..r• 0 500 1,000 1.500 at Proposed Amendment • The TCDA is interested in increasing the Maximum Indebtedness of the City Center Urban Renewal Area by $20,800,000 to allow for allocating additional funds to projects in the Plan . • This brings the total MI to $42,800,000. • New Debt can issued until 2036. • Plan originally approved by voters in 2006 with a substantial amendment to add acreage in 2017. O r CRASH COURSE UR 101 0 $ 471 A REGULAR TAXING PROPERTY TAX REVENUE REGULAR TAXING JURISDICTIONS S S S $ City, County, Etc. Elaine Howard Consulting LLC CRASH COURSE UR 101 /Alec" /\ $ s PROPERTY TAX PROPERTY TAX REVENUE INCREASES $ $ $S $ REGULAR TAXING 1. 3%Appreciation JURISDICTIONS 2. Substantiae Improvements City, County, Etc. Elaine Howard Consulting LLC O ce CRASH COURSE UR 101 CITY • URBA ...,,,. RENEW ARE PROPERTY TAX REVENUE PROPERTY TAX REGULAR TAXING INCREASES $ s s ss JURISDICTIONS 1. 3%Appreciation 2. Substantiae Improvements City, County, Etc. Elaine Howard Consulting LLC Tax Increment Finance Over Time Increased tax Depressed revenues to all conditions I. $$ I I I I z 0 I J W $g 1 2 w i 0 i z I U i W W v) � _ W I W I W Q $4 INCREMENT H W I $2 FROZEN BASE Overview of Tigard CityCenter Accomplishments Since 2006 • $ 48.8M - Private investment into property improvements and new construction (3x the amount of investment in the 12 years preceding urban renewal). • 64% - Increase in assessed value between 2006 — 2019 (compared to a 56% increase in assessed value citywide). • 28 - Matching grants for building improvements to downtown businesses. • $2.60:$1.00 - Leverage ratio of private to public investment into urban renewal tenant and storefront improvements. • 234 - New apartments constructed. • 32% - Increase in housing in City Center URA (compared to a 12% increase in the rest of Tigard). ! - ---- • ... .• Attwell off Main. ...• . _ . . _____/ • .,0 A . .._..., ..:A .. r.-- - I . :..... .. ,. • - /4444141k 61# ./. . __ . iiit.iir rifil I 1%.' III I I d , .,.... 1 : d, !-- [1. 0 -AId .14,!I WI' •.-... .0 — : I .,.;••;4 ::-- _..- _ '., .;.•-: ..'...."4?.. . L :. r ....... .. .• .. . 1 o.__, - •• .. : L ! L....,II , %• . • . 1, •. • . , •_• • ,:•._:: irv„ -6-E • I. • — . . -----' • . _ — • — _ _ -••i: .-41- ' • '-'4..... : . ''''''• - . ;•-: :11.-.. , r_•_ (1111 API 1.. . ' i• -'.1.7 — -. .-•'—ii; %.-.._. ...!.; I 1 Mr r . -g. r --:•0. I 1\ t-' . 1 I.. . 0,-, . r , • -.,..__ 1 .1 ...f .. ...- .._. P ' .,=s,7-7.7. rIVEyLl .'7- .'. k• ._:. di. - . --• ' ni III , : .,,,,. -- — 1 ! 4.7_71—r— — .i-k-Fr':::#7!---. 4 . .._-- .011, -7 -i . . r -. ---I. . .17,-.;..±-7... 4.— . gr-- . ._ _ ... . • . _• • . . . .. - ..._ :., • _11-,..• • • - ____ • , . . _•_ I.I, .. . . ... __— _- :_ _•-- -. __ .....,____ ___•-• ,----- - _ • .___---- - _ . / • _--- . __ - _ _- ._ - Main St and Burnham Improvements r .......i.iiii. ... lct ill 1111111.1111.114, `= SYMR� ., 11111111111 WI' A kL Is: I -- ©� 1� v '` :� �� AA --+ c rii 1 (... e., ___. ..... If _ ____ '-- N NU , 41114yr _ _ ,.. . milk.. , �rF a r • . . 1 .... ... . . \ :.''.)7--,1•• • • --."; •. 1 . 1111111kLillill'h i _ ,-._,:. . - • _,,._:,-1--44-,_-Ab_ .,••• it - ‘#"_Mkt___- . •. :-• .... mmul /1"/ - - . . • • - .. ... no s„_ , ,. .,•,•,_..... ,-, H ro , • .,_ I, •-, , ... ' . . • . .. IN1 I , .. . . (....0 ro I .--c- ',. -..._ ta) 1 , A' 'e•- . . . CL . • AK' ,_- • 4.1'.. ; .1: Nt 7.7 (1"10 kW. ., • - ., .• r_roi--.< >- Q 2"5:1‘1‹ - 1M:I I b 1 \•. • (41 Sii, (::: '..".x/4:.= i - - . . j ' % 1 ' --• .1 . .. ' •r--',,,:.:,-- -., '•,, _r' 0,14(g.,'•--. "‘`..- 1 4 • .1112.. •k. . B . liohJZ. • i . I ' -1"..--.; ,,.. '`I-, : - - -ii • , 1, , .7.- .- .. • :5 II2 • ' - .' 1-J. t:,;i0,4•, . . '1 ,••• 11,41;‘,.:r•:_,:,, 1..--,...::41", . - ... - :4.:'. 1*-1 no cZ -r . ._:... .. .,-.-... ,z,•••••=1,- : ' i• Emiriza - r. to • o _. -,::. -_ -", 47:144-:-. . , ..'.;:ti .-,-'' .• ' H - -le•..,.‘.-".: . *:,-i- '. ' . ( • • 1 . --- : -..., •• ,'i, ....ITO:: .-".. • i el':: -.."'-- . . '' ' -• ' 1 • .J.' • ,I., x .. . Additional Projects CompletedJ • Streetscape Improvements A Pir m. • Ash Avenue Connection _. • Burnham Street Public _ _ ��j� ' $efole Parking Lot - - t ;: yn. R,. pUe MPJ,Z • Ash Avenue Dog Park +s_ 11 / • Fanno Creek Regional Trail Undercrossing Lights • Facade & Interior ° °` } ill i m rovement Grants =y r jie., f , YA6 Active Projects Main Street at Fanno Creek Development -610.... :1 f siii_np 1-:J ti i ion; ITT I! ..._... .1 ., . . , -:,:: . 4- ' •I ...al_ .0 v.; 1 iiptip4 Hi. , ]] II I MIAMI] 11 -- Ir i AN 1 ' • ., I. i I a ' wommoiiiiks" _ ,._ _ __ _ _ . ---,- i-_,APP'-• r ' - " ''' '''' '' - . ..-. vi.,...;.„.,, - 7 is Am i [ _ _ . _ ,... , i 1 _. I I 1kirg I' • I 10E401 Ai I 'I i latil- P1 --k -::---.' , • - ,---AA.... ' i•-fi'- II r alik-- $ , i . ,. 11111k ril*'-' Active Projects • Urban Renewal Improvement Program • Universal Plaza design .....milli-.. 7: 41amonaminalmininip..47111____ 'tel` Projects Supported by Additional Funds from the Substantial Amendment • Construction of New Streets to Provide Connectivity • Tigard Heritage Trail Continuation to Hall Blvd. • Fanno Creek Trail Improvements • Universal Plaza (shade structures, community room, final features) • Shared Parking Structure • Affordable Housing and Mixed-Use Development Assistance • Pedestrian Safety and Streetscape Improvements • Land Acquisition Process and Timeline ➢ December 9- TCAC recommended approval ➢ December 15 - TCDA Board ➢January 4 - Tigard Planning Commission ➢ Before February 9 - Resolutions by Taxing Districts (Washington County, TVF& R, TTSD) ➢ February 9 - City Council Hearing ➢ May 18 — Ballot Measure goes before Tigard Voters How Does this Plan Relate to the Comprehensive Plan ? Existing findings remain with some additions • Natural Resources and Historic Areas • Economic Development • Housing • Transportation • Special Planning Areas- Downtown • Parks, Recreation, Trails, And Open Space Consistent with Other City Plans • Transportation System Plan • Tigard Parks System Master Plan • Affordable Housing Plan • Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025 Recommendation/Suggested Motion • "I move that the Tigard Planning Commission finds, based upon the information provided in the staff report and the provided attachments, that the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment conforms with the Tigard Comprehensive Plan and further recommend that the Tigard City Council adopt the proposed Plan Amendment." Where can I learn more ? • Contact staff: Sean @tiga rd -or. gov La u renS@tiga rd -or. gov • Visit website www.tigard -or. gov/urbanrenewal EXHIBIT B — City of Tigard CityFacilities Consolidation CFC Project , - • 441111r. ; • • . ' ..,....,_ - Tigard PlanningCommission Briefing ' � * . ft. January 4, 2020 __ IF • + - 17 t ,i:.., —he ... 1. tilik. ' • 's' :...., Pd. r I' t V. FA gilt l] •t�'r' *_l �'� ft: III '11 4-�Itfv-, �, .. � .. _ +e _ • `�� -•i IGARD ••+ 4 t . 411(4ra 1. --4.. ',Ft/ 4 .iri ..5 11 At'1 1 IL - A. i i. . II ' • 1I V. ti # II 411' t Agenda n 1111 �. r. ...-- y� � �- _• About theCFC project Project• overview w • Why i s i t necessary? :,� . t; �r � � ,�_ �� W�,�� .�� ' , /� � '.....r CM'S.+ r� 7� =* :'- . " • sic _r. ' r • What are the potential opportunities? �, -- _ w ; ; ` : - :: •-46.• Whytake action 4. • K 7 te . FR. - - • Next steps Y• Communityengagement• Activities to date • Upcoming ways to get involved IN . .„„ • Q&A/Discussion TIGARD About the CFC Project — A necessary, cost-effective solution to meet Tigard's needs now and into the future _ , ,,,y . , To meet the needs of our growing • -- ,, community Cityof Tigard is i : �� -F 1 Y g <. , , _ Li, -amu considering consolidating most of its Welcome to \�I,��r. public services in a new buildin thatrTIGARD g __. A Place to Call Home would replace its aging downtown � �-- _ -- � r facilities and energize the downtown " \' ` ' I. IBREll � 'Mi '�� t j 4 r; ,� � ,A a 2t 4 ae � � ,r � • • i --„,.... ....0„0„,ti, l � � a v c 1,,,,,''o., .,�. district at the same time , , {, 1b IN P . 41 • TIGARD Project description Key elements: • Design and construct new building to house most city services on current city-owned property across the street from the current city hall location . • Relocate the Public Works yard and construct new building outside of the downtown core. • Open up 9.5 acres within the current City Hall site for redevelopment. • Potentially relocate and enhance Tigard Skate Park. TIGARD • Project timeline • Phase 1: Move Ahead Separately or Together? (August 2019 - Feb. 2020) • Phase 2: Proceed Now or Proceed Later? ( Feb. 2020 - Jan . 2021) • Phase 3: Government Project or Community Project? (2021) TIGARD Why is this project necessary? City buildings need repair to maintain safe operations • Extensive, expensive repairs are The city's facilities maintenance needed — such as the HVAC system, backlog could reach $14 million by sewer connections, and roof of the PD 2026 and an additional $19 million building. is needed to bring buildingsup to • Facilities do not meet current seismic current seismic standards. standards that will ensure the city can maintain operations and respond in a seismic event. 1111 " T I GARD • w 49 Properties the city owns or controls A y, �4., Property the city is leasing — The „\. ‘...7.,:, , . ...„,_ „Timor . City is evaluatingthe best .vy • �;� ,� �.� "� =LL- - 0 • ,„,, rte solution forTigard ,-fc. \ e.�,�y - • Constructing two new facilities is more cost-effective, 41S, i,., •*- b4 • : compared to trying to upgrade old buildings over the ' . .'' .' . 4- 14> p Y g pg g next twenty years and rent additional space. . ` ,:- ` ” • Even with construction costs, it is still less costly to ' =`'- ` w = . ., ► ' ' the city because the new buildings will still have value �* r• in 20 years, and the city will be collecting revenues 1 „_: .-74... , - from property sale and development. ,.., �`� , 4, p p Y p '9 , ' m ae r , ,.- " _ j is • Consolidation also creates a great opportunity to 4 " reimagine how the city's 13.5 acres can contribute to K' a c • rte, • , a more livable, walkable downtown. .� .� _ _ , • T I GARD Project funding • The project can be funded without raising property taxes. Property tax assessments that are set to expire would continue at current levels, if approved by residents in the November 2021 election . • Additional financing would include : utility rate increases, special revenue funds, photo red light and vehicular speed enforcement, tax increment financing and land sale proceeds. TIGARD • Why now? Resiliency: The pandemic has . shown us the importance of planning for the unexpectedandr `:M +1f p g 411 : b%) the ability to continue city I operations in an emergency. .11 ... / r . °1 \ City of Tigaard Cost: Maintenance costs will CORONAVIRUS Rs � __ �" • - continue to increase, and U P D A T E # t construction costs have increased by 5% annually for several years. if we replace the facilities by 2025, we can do it without raising property taxes. T I GARD What are the potential opportunities ? Improves downtown Tigard Changing the City's footprint downtown �t1 _ , will help. _ of ft Existing• city properties could be \'i►, IV in i redeveloped into more than 500 new if ii 1.: fil apartments and expanded affordable ,. it housing options. a 0 -q • New housing would stimulate downtown development, which 64 could lead to more shopping, dining, _ _ and housing and increase walkability. _ v — -- : -� __ t i, -, • Redeveloping this area of downtown . = will catalyze the whole area from _ - Main to Hall NI !I T I GARD . Community benefits mr ..,... .sr..:: :::ze ., .. • The building will house a J . . .... •- , - r- communit room, available to ."• #�'�• }„, - reserve for civic meetings and • y _ *e - .., Ir •-{• events . _41 J:15U'. • A new parking structure will . __,... ..-r .• rte• . ` . - _ _- provide additional parking for . r - •r • - 1. - - -, downtown visitors . _ ,, if..:: r _ -• Opportunity to create new tax , � r jr e V Z::: ! revenues from downtown ...±..... . ,..,,,:•, ...v..,,„: . . . ,.: rlk , • development . P . • T I GARD Community benefits • New facilities will ensure that in the event of an earthquake city staff will be safe and residents will still be able to access essential government services. • Provides better safety, security, and training and operations space for Tigard PD, leading to continued improvements in emergency response and efficiency. TIGARD Long-Term Benefits Johnson Economics found the CFC project to be the preferred option evaluated 2020 Feasibility over a 20-year period . The project is likely to result in : Assessment Findings: • Building the new • Lowest net overall cost of space facility creates • Better urban design solution in downtown Tigard additional revenues totaling over $24 • More intensive utilization of urban land million over the next • New property tax revenues from released sites 20 years. • Additional development in the downtown core (e.g., coffee, shopping, restaurants, etc. ) ! : TIGARD What are the next steps ? - Upcoming activities 9 Jan. 2021 9 Spring 2021 I T Summer-Fall 2021 9 May 2022 9 Ongoing Provide update to City : Design development of : Continued site and : Target date for potential : Public communications Council on the feasibility : site and building design : building design : construction of new Public : and engagement of the project and confirm options for new City Hall development for new City Works building � their continued support ; and Public Works sites ; Hall and Public Works sites —i City Council receives the final feasibility report and decides whether to move � Visioning and preliminary ; forward with a general ; Potential vote on ; Target date for project design for new City Hall and : obligation bond for the : continuation of general : construction for new city Public Works sites : project. : obligation bonds : hall OWinter 2021 OJune 2021 ONov. 2021 OSummer2O23 M., T IGARD Potential future redevelopment .,.... .p- .r ... _ � : �� r . -- - . - NI . r .n. ib..---•_. :-.--- • If CFC project is approved, the city ��' 'fy e, , y would hold a master planning k :m ... ...... r � • .� ,• {�',, fik process in future years. k - _ . . ... • The process would -. . .:. 44 include - ..1 ' .rd. ; '.4141%,,i.'%, . opportunities for public input on the • �r` '' rte{ -IP :• - ,.: I . IN _ likal'i .. Imoth„ ■ ..... ti 11. vision for redevelopment. f _ � A • • Affordable housing is the city's .-� , : _ �_ �* - f priorityfor an inclusive and walkable • :� + ' • - - - downtown IN .. ' TIGARD Community Engagement Activities to date • Held kick-off meeting with city staff and consultant team • Conducted interviews with city staff and community stakeholders • Focus group meeting with Tigard business leaders and downtown interests • Developed research report of key findings • Developed strategic communications and engagement plan • Beginning early engagement by briefing Tigard advisory committees • Developing communications and outreach tools TIGARD • Upcoming opportunities E f, " • .1 . • We want to hear from you ! The city will . isima :r,• : ` listen to communityvoices to lana 40 .. i - ,. �w - it 1 r, �. r solution that works for Tigard . ; fi ;`_r ,i • Beginning in mid-January, outreach and r , _ engagement will include : \ i .� :.• * � l, rF . • Community input/questionnaire hosted = ! ,, 4 i a *' nt online at YourTigard engagement site � ° ."':',41 _ fy • Project website i „ f. ; , w ,: ,Vitt. F,11 r ,. 4 • City communications: social media, podcast, media, e-newsletter, etc. • Direct outreach and briefings (virtual, !Pi ,� pending CQVID-19 safetyguidance)p g 4g • TIGARD Questions? , Iiin\IN City ofTigard Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done 1.... • . .... , . . City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment ...- ....„...„..._ ,•....,:.,,, , 7. ,..,400„'....4.,........ --47--- --04,ft A- .„,..1 . ,, ,....„..., . „. 41114 ., Ar____-4_2r/ :' -' ' ' Iv' - • , . - • .. - --- - — ,....p- . -..-----... .,....-..-,.4.7. ..,„ '‘-' ._----. ,..?41, -- -.-- -r--", ,- _ „A. : '. If 4. ,---- r, / ..- ', !' 7 .e•1 Hp . 1 p:.,' .. ....--2. . --...„;-- , - ,--,:-.1-.. ---z. ,i vt.,:4.,,,,, .. ,.,4, •..___ _ • _VAL-.. ,, . i y• ---y ,,,-;, , , -.- .-.-1 ,,:.,,,.,, ......T_.: . ..41.-:-.... - ---_______________-- „.. .0-4.- ., ' 21-f‘ _________ ,.., , . . , - - ., -• 1111iiP, . _ 01/, •-.:..- , . -,• ,t,,:•..` T.''54"----14-- - ..... e.--C%-z .." • ,,,...t , .,,,, ..* -...• / / I.' P. • ,=-7--=4-7—='&4740,.:7. - , I......4.*0. $ eF.,411‘--* ci/,.......:; ' / M. 7.•_ --' -,-.-Nir. i 11 ' __------,..--- / ,'-.-'- . . .. ----', ---'-' , 1 - . - --__ .-- .ciY• 41. ,: '. be ,,/ 4414w 1 -:Lt:____-_-!'- f /0 iir --... , ,. ..'.., '' . '''. "F• - - ',4+ - .---„ 1..--,,,-__ . . •, W . 9,11,,, . / --- .._____ v '• 4 :I 1 .- • ') 1 City Council Public Hearing, February 9, 2021 City ofTigard Issue : Public Hearing for City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Recommendation : Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance City ofTigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan s�co •,„ •.. 9ya •••• •a•;* • Approved by voters in 2006 x =: a I. , • Existing MI = $22 million � .°N . ''•••• ♦+�•+. tom•��, a •'j'�1 •• over 20 years •••••• *•••• :.•.••.... ..•. :• * a .........:.• • Substantial amendment was .'. ••' „ • .• .. •. approved adding acreage in �''•� "' 2017y` • sy v • Urban renewal is not a new •. • . • tax it adjusts how we s allocate existing tax revenue. ;. Tigard GtyCer aer URA 0 SOO 1000 1.WOlee c How Urban Renewal Works City ofTigard Depressed Increased tax revenues to all conditions I I I I I I I I I I U) I I Z I 0W' I O I - J J ! C I J I 0 I (/) ! C_ I W Z J ! l U J ! W I >< W $4 INCREMENTcc I I I I I I I $2 I I I I FROZEN BASE I I I I City ofTigard Current Urban Renewal Plan Proposed Urban Renewal Amendment Duration: Size: Ends Ends in Duration: 1 1035 228 . 96AcREs + YEARS Ends in Maximum Maximum Indebtedness: Totaling $22 $42 Indebtedness: 8 MILLION + 8 'ILLION MILLION • Provides funding to complete new urban renewal projects • Requires voter approval II City ofTigard Overview of Tigard City Center Accomplishments • $ 48.8M - Private investment into property improvements and new construction (3x the investment in the 12 years preceding urban renewal). • 64% - Assessed value increase 2006 — 2019 (compared to a 56% increase in assessed value citywide). • 28 - Matching grants for building improvements to downtown businesses • $2.60 : $1.00 - Leverage ratio of private to public investment into urban renewal tenant and storefront improvements • 234 - New units of multifamily housing units constructed Accomplishments City ofTigard Street and Streetscape Projects co, ,, • 0, ,i -4 _ -. "=---... . yam. I 1y L { ..}L 1 iI II •.� S.� �,4 •�;.LJiT ./ "f 1' A.fid'{� t�e ^, 15 i. f 111F. Tr- ' 1, ,,—.-: :1 iigmn 1 - s ...,.. ii _.41 .. ... _. ,_ . ___., 1 _ ... . _ . ....... A r • 1 i .,. 1-' A('' i‘ Q I Accomplishments City ofligard Mixed Use Redevelopment _ _ -_, -4' ' AIIIIIIAPIIIIklt 0 , , : ,...., ,- , I.' i = IV q1111111411 ., Lit T."1.'•1f til' 6 Ilk I. 44 li __ --- -- _ _. •_ ........ _ ___ . i, - --..—= —, i ----_______ : • ,,, , i i „, ,, _ •_.i!gyil r----- if„...11--, i±-_,-.. I.. .. ._.i -1-rs --,-- i _ ... i • .,b, , 3 .,, ti . — _ ,....,.. ...... . ,-„, , . . ,y f ` 14__ 1 -" � Vii'--- _ �, , -'� 1� _ Accomplishments City orrigard Public Spaces iiit 4 , i i ger • 12 • . • . ‘ir • , . 1 , . • .•it 1 , 7 "., .,' • . • .... 10 . JR T . ... ., A Rif., ,,• - 41+,5 r ,.... - .. I. . .., • . I, ...,.. . . ..i. .,. . • *All I - . li illk.„ -7._:::; a. • , i — IL:- 0 • -1.,,, ---,..• "" •':.:._,:"--:.. ,.., • " Ts ''''' --MIIIIIMI'"alitillii I . , 00 --riimomini -- , - ..----"------ - 4....L.,mi....„:- ••••_Viler+ - - ---- - ----------- -, 1 N._ _ - • A.,,..... Urban Renewal Matching Grant City ofTigard Program 12549 SW Main St. — Before _, - i After LH -: .,_ .. : . . . ,. IIIII.._ iip_____ i . rw .----r., -dil, , 1 yrIi. iii - CYCLE Ci EX% Senet Game Bar— Before After 4y.i ' 1 • r• 1i1 0 r1 ,* i 1 ''...7.-- � , .i1\,ce ' / .>' _ -I . -_�. Active Projects City ofTigard Main Street at Fanno Creek Development Coming 2022 . _ • il A tot; . -NAN I:1 -- ;i1 ani I [ ...--. 1 AMP' 11 11 , II ill 47,:i. 01111 Pi r ----- "ill 11 — :.. _.— ...,., „. . i gi kI ... i i li"" - •'''' ' '''''''' owI;1111111illil — • ,I I r r -, silillit' :f•.',..-: - • •-I .. ...... ,.. -4...474-7..- ... '..„i7„.:-„.- , -''''::rt"'''1-; ".• .'*--.. ricat 11% . 1Mili ( 1 - - -• - . — . ,.- • , i• .. _ -• • ,,,,..-• ' &I I I ...- Atli_lir,: '. Jai*- !: .':4111;IiiiilliftV leo i Li-1., ,.,,F1 Opre-' 1 . ,ri ip,A--,;, esilial 31.- . . .....- . .: . Ink . • Active Projects City ofligard Universal Plaza Coming 2022 4110 t 44 Arir• i4'*� • •J ICity ofTigard I, Why do we need the amendment? To fund new UR projects: • Construction of New Streets to Provide Connectivity • Tigard Heritage Trail Continuation • Fanno Creek Trail Improvements • Universal Plaza Phase 2 • Parking Facility • Affordable Housing and Mixed-Use Development Assistance • Pedestrian Safety and Streetscape Improvements City ofTigard Public Comment Town Center Advisory Commission Reviewed by Town Center Development Agency on December 15, 2020— sent out for public review Taxing jurisdictions notified Presentations to TTSD, TVF&R, Washington County, and TTAD Planning Commission hearing City ofTigard Staff Recommendation Approve the Ordinance adopting the Plan Amendment Direct Staff to Prepare the Ballot Title for board action on February 23, 2021 for May 18, 2021 election City ofTigard For more information • Visit website www.tigard-or.gov/urbanrenewal • Contact staff Sean@tigard-or.gov LaurenS@tigard-or.gov Questions and Public Comment AIS-4558 5. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/09/2021 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Concurrence with Maximum Indebtedness Increase for the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Submitted By: Sean Farrelly, Community Development Item Type: Resolution Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall Council adopt a resolution concurring with the maximum indebtedness increase for the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the resolution. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard adopted the City Center Urban Renewal Plan in 2005. Over the past fifteen years, community and City leaders have pursued a dedicated course of incremental improvements through public and private development in downtown Tigard. Investments in streets, parks, and trails have improved the public realm, while public/private development projects have brought hundreds of new residents to the downtown and improved the business district. Despite this success, the Development Agency finds that the original $22 million in maximum indebtedness (MI) in the TIF Plan is not sufficient to complete the projects in the plan, or to allow the addition of newly identified projects. To explore this issue, the agency completed the City Center Futures Project in 2020. As part of that project, three alternatives were considered for extending the City Center Urban Renewal (TIF) District. The recommended option was to pursue a substantial amendment to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to increase the MI within the existing Urban Renewal Area (URA) boundaries. MI is the total amount of funds that may be spent on programs, projects and administration over the life of a URA. MI does not include interest paid on debt. The original and current MI for the Tigard URA is $22 million. The City proposes to increase the MI by $20.8 million, bringing the total MI to $42.8 million. The projects to be undertaken with the new MI are: • Construction of new streets to provide connectivity •Tigard Heritage Trail continuation •Fanno Creek Trail improvements •Universal Plaza Phase 2 •Parking facility •Affordable housing and mixed-use development assistance •Pedestrian safety and streetscape improvements •Property acquisition The proposed URA plan amendment would extend by nine years the last day to issue debt (from the 20th anniversary to the 29th anniversary of the TIF Plan adoption date). Tax increment revenues after the 29th anniversary (FY 2034-35) will be spent solely on retiring debt. Revenue sharing is part of the 2009 legislative changes to urban renewal and comes into effect when a substantial amendment to increase MI is approved. Revenue-sharing targets are projected to be reached in FY 2035-36. As required by ORS 457.220 and ORS 457.470, this level of MI increase must be approved through adoption of a resolution by the governing bodies of the taxing districts that levy 75 percent of the permanent rate taxes in the URA, of which the City of Tigard is one. The Tigard City Council is scheduled to consider adoption of this amendment by Feb. 9, 2021. The taxing districts have been asked to adopt concurrence resolutions by this date. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could choose to not approve the resolution, which would mean the Substantial Amendment could not be approved in its current form. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS 2019-2021 Tigard City Council Goals Strategy 2.2 Continue to make Downtown Tigard a place people want to be by making substantial progress on projects that attract new residential and business investment: Evaluate the size and scope of the City Center Urban Renewal Plan to determine whether tax increment resources in the downtown are sufficient to meet council objectives. Prepare recommendations regarding the City Center urban renewal area's possible continuation. City Center Urban Renewal Plan Tigard Comprehensive Plan Special Planning Areas- Downtown Goal 15.2 Facilitate the development of an urban village City Strategic Plan 2020-2025 Priority 3 — Ensure development advances the vision. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION December 15, 2020- Initiate public review of City Center Substantial Amendment October 20, 2020 - City Center Substantial Amendment Update August 18, 2020 - City Center Futures Update Fiscal Impact Cost: $6,284,384 Budgeted (yes or no): no Where Budgeted (department/program): If approved, funds would be budgeted in theTCDA Additional Fiscal Notes: The estimated fiscal impacts to the City with the original and amended MI are summarized below: Impact of original MI from FY 2019-20 through FY 2035-36: ($4,650,313) Impact of new MI from FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49: ($6,284,384) Total Impact (original and new): ($10,934,697) Estimated Revenue Sharing: FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49: $4,215,949 The impact to the City of Tigard due to the proposed amendment's increased MI is $6,284,384 which reflects the $4,215,949 in revenue sharing which runs FY 2035-36 through FY 2048-49. After the district is closed down, tax revenue to the City of Tigard will be greater than would have been otherwise collected in the absence of the urban renewal investments. Attachments Resolution Exhibit A -Plan Amendment Exhibit B- Report Accompanying the Plan Exhibit C- Taxing Jurisdictions Impacts Presentation CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21- A RESOLUTION CONCURRING WITH THE MAXIMUM INDEBTEDNESS INCREASE FOR THE TIGARD CITY CEN'1'bR URBAN RENEWAL PLAN WHEREAS, the Tigard Town Center Development Agency ("TCDA") is an urban renewal agency formed under ORS Chapter 457;and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council ("City Council") adopted the Town Center Urban Renewal Plan ("Plan") on May 16, 2006;and WHEREAS, the TCDA desires to amend the Plan to increase the maximum indebtedness, update project descriptions and add projects, and generally update the Plan; and WHEREAS, the maximum indebtedness increase from $22,000,000 to $42,800,000 requires concurrence of taxing districts in accordance with ORS 457.220 and ORS 457.470; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are show in Exhibit A—Plan Amendment and in Exhibit B —Report on the Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the estimated impacts to the taxing districts are attached hereto as Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, the TCDA is consulting with impacted taxing districts regarding the increase in maximum indebtedness; and WHEREAS, the TCDA has requested concurrence from the Tigard City Council;and WHEREAS,the Tigard City Council has considered this request. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The above-stated findings contained in this Resolution are hereby adopted. SECTION 2: The purpose of this Resolution is to concur with the increase in maximum indebtedness of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan pursuant to ORS 457.220 and ORS 457.470. SECTION 3: The Tigard City Council hereby approves the increase in the maximum indebtedness of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan. SECTION 4: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. RESOLUTION NO.21- Page 1 PASSED: This day of 2021. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO.21- Page 2 Proposed new text is shown in double-underline. Deleted text is shown in strikethrough. Explanatory language shown in italics. TIGARD CITY CENTER URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AMENDMENT Only the proposed changes are shown, current plan can be viewed at: https://www.tigard- or.gov/urbanrenewal/ I. Introduction The Original Plan has had a duration of 20 years (see Chapter XI), meaning that no new debt w114 would be incurred after Fiscal Year 2025/2026. The maximum amount of indebtedness (amount of tax increment financing for projects and programa that may be issued for the Plan is Twenty Two Million Dollarc and No Cents ($22,000,000). The first substantial amendment was developed in 2016 and went to voters in the May 2017 election. It amended the boundary and updated the plan as needed. The second substantial amendment was developed in 2020 and went to the voters in the May 2021 election. It added proiects. increased the maximum indebtedness. and updated the plan as needed. The maximum amount of indebtedness (amount of tax increment financing for proiects and programs) that may be issued for the Plan is Forty-Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and no cents (542.800.000). No new debt will be incurred after Fiscal Year 2034/2035. II. Goals and Objectives Goal 3— Downtown's transportation system should be multi-modal, connecting people places and activities safely and conveniently. Objectives: 3B: Concurrent with proposed street improvements, and in conformance with the Tigard Transportation System Plan (TSP), provide public and private parking facilities, bike lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and other pedestrian, and bicycle facilities that promote multimodal usage, access and safety. 1 Goal 5 - Promote high quality development of retail, office and residential uses that support and are supported by public streetscape, transportation, recreation and open space investments. Objectives: 5A: Provide development incentives and technical assistance programs that encourage business and property owners to develop projects that are consistent with the Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan vision, the 2019 Affordable Housing Plan. the City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025, and the Tigard Comprehensive Plan. 5C: Provide for property acquisition to support this goal. III. Outline of projects The Plan identifies transportation projects, including street improvements, streetscape improvements and bicycle/pedestrian facilities improvements, which will increase multimodal connectivity throughout the Area and make downtown Tigard a safer and more accessible destination. The Plan also includes Parks, Public Spaces and Public Facilities projects that will beautify the Area, increase neighborhood livability and provide opportunities for residents, visitors and downtown workers to participate in a wide range of community and recreational activities. Planning and Development Assistance Programs identified in the Plan will facilitate the development, redevelopment and rehabilitation of private property in the Area. The programs will encourage Area business and property owners to invest in projects that will increase the economic vitality of downtown Tigard, add affordable housing units to the Area and support the goals and objectives of the Tigard Downtown Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan. IV. Map and Legal Description of Urban Renewal Area No changes to this section V. Urban Renewal Projects Urban renewal projects authorized under the Plan, which may be undertaken by the Agency, are described below. and shown in Figures 2 to 7 To preserve and enhance the Area's natural resources, projects will be designed and implemented with consideration for ecologically sensitive areas and to minimize the impacts of development on the environment. Property acquisition may be required for these 2 projects. Further, some of the projects described herein will require participation of other public agencies. Figure 2 is replaced and Figures 5,6 and 7 are removed from the Plan. A. Street Improvements 7. Construction of New Streets Construction of new streets to provide connectivity within the Area. as identified by hash marks on Figure 2. 7 Figure 2 Downtown Connectivity Plan S SS Potential Future Streets Map 4 & 4 t cNi 1 u C crypE �a� lo QA. F Cok (�2 G sT • 9ry•�,O `f 1 ■ TIG 4 1 D ,,T IIyd t #,A) , *.x C ,:: c .. e\''''', 1/4. . 'N • k:'..,,, 0, coP6.. h' • •/ P`` \ % \ ♦ \ti % %%1 .y`k Downtown Street Character Types" Upper Hall Boulevard" 4P Main Street Green Street 411 Downtown Mixed Use 1 (Collector) -Downtown Mixed Use (Neighborhood) -Downtown Mixed Use 3(Upper Burnham) db Downtown Mixed Use (Lower Burnham) Urban Residential -Alley:Business 0 250 500 1,000 Feet C I I I I I I I 1 'Dashed lmes mdcate proposed streets -Other Streets —Hall Boulevard's currently an MOT facility [MOTs design standards may supersede these standards as tang xtii" Railroads as it tsar!ODOT facility N 3 B. Streetscape Improvements— No changes to this section. C. Bike/Pedestrian Facilities - 10.Tigard Heritage Trail (Main Street to Hall Boulevard) This proiect will increase pedestrian access and provide new recreational opportunities for residents. workers and visitors to downtown. The proiect will build a new path connecting Main Street to the existing multi-use trail that connects the Commuter Rail parking lot to Hall Boulevard. and include historical/educational installations and other amenities. 11. Fanno Creek Trail Improvements Improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail within the Area will include new trail connections. lighting. accessibility improvements. boardwalks and wavfinding. D. Parks - delete Figure 5 E. Public Spaces - delete Figure 6 2. Plazas The design and construction of public plazas that will serve as public gathering spaces is a project under the Plan. This project will encourage a broader range of active and passive recreational uses in downtown and attract more residents and visitors to the area. The Universal Plaza proiect will provide a large public space that includes a water feature. covered area. connection to Fanno Creek Trail, restrooms. and other amenities. F. Public Facilities - delete Figure 7 2. Public Parking Facilities The design and construction of new public parking facilities is a project under the Plan. As new shopping, recreational and entertainment uses, including the proposed performing arts center and public market, are established in the downtown area, new public parking facilities will be needed to accommodate the anticipated increase in parking demand. This proiect includes structured parking that would iointly serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the downtown. 4 G. Planning and Development Assistance 5. Affordable Housing Development Assistance Grants and technical assistance to encourage new regulated affordable housing, and preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing. J. Finance Fees and Plan Administration This category allows for repayment of costs associated with implementation of the Plan. including but not limited to ongoing administration and financing costs associated with issuing long-and short-term debt. relocation costs. and other administrative costs. VI. Relationship to Local Objectives A. City of Tigard Community Development Code The City of Tigard Community Development Code establishes zoning districts, which govern allowed uses and contain development standards.The Area encompasses property within the City's commercial, industrial. and parks and recreation and industrial zoning districts. According to the City's Development Code, the purpose of commercial zoning districts-is - - - - - - - --- - . :- _ _ - --- •. - .' - •- -- -: retail and office uscc -that arc conveniently accessible to motorictc, bicyolictc/and pedoVzrianc-and designed to minimize potential adverse impacts on surrounding residential neighlxrhoadc. Further, in compliance-with the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan, the commercial zoning districts arc intended to provide a wide range of employment opportuniti- . - - _ _ -• _ -- ' _ _ . - - . to implement the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan related to land use planning and economic development by: A. Ensuring that a full range of goods and services are available throughout the city so that residents can fulfill all or most of their needs within easy driving distance and, ideally, within easy walking and biking distance of their homes; B. Ensuring that a full range of economic activities and job opportunities are available throughout the city; and C. Minimizing the potential adverse impacts of commercial uses on residential uses by carefully locating and selecting the types of uses allowed in each commercial zone. The purpose of Tigard's industrial zoning districts is to provide a broad range of iftckx trial cervices and jobs within the City of Tigard that are convoniontly accessible to local residents.-implement the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan related to land use planning and economic development by: 5 A. Ensuring that a full range of economic activities and iob opportunities are available throughout the city: and B. Minimizing the potential adverse impacts of industrial uses of industrial uses on nonindustrial uses by carefully locating and selecting the types of uses allowed in each industrial zone. The purpose of Tigard's parks and recreation zoning district is to preserve and enhance publicly-owned open space and natural and improved parkland within the city. This zone is intended to serve many functions including: A. Providing opportunities for both active and passive recreational facilities to meet neighborhood. community, and regional needs; B. Providing contrast to the built environment; C. Providing opportunities to strengthen community identity. improve public health. and foster interactions between citizens; D. Providing economic development by creating a desirable public image and robust quality of life: E. Recognizing that publicly-owned parks have a special relationship to the community and are an important resource: F. Providing flexibility in the use and development of recreational facilities as the city responds to changes in demographics. program needs. and external regulatory requirements: and G. Allowing for the efficient implementation of plans and improvements to parks, recreational facilities. and open areas with appropriate reviews where compatibility issues may arise. A detailed description of commercial, industrial, and parks and recreation zoning districts within the Area and corresponding development standards are described in Section VII below. The Plan implements the public investments necessary to generate development that is consistent with Mixed-Use Central Business District, General Commercial District, Industrial Park District. and Parks and Recreation District. and Profcssional Commcrcal Di.:tricts as well r the R 4.5 Low Dcnsity Rcsidcntial ✓strict, R 12 Medium Dcn:ity Rcsidcntial Di:frict and R 25 Medium High Density District. Further, the Plan will help ensure that the Area develops efficiently, with high quality, attractive development that creates an identity and sense of place unique to downtown Tigard. 6 B. Tigard Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Parks. Recreation.Trails. And Open Space The Comprehensive Plan addresses access to parks. recreation. trails. and open space that enhance the livability of a community and contributes to the well-being of its residents. Parks policies supported by the Plan include: Goal 8.1 Provide a wide variety of high quality park and open spaces for all residents, including both developed areas with facilities for active recreation and undeveloped areas for nature oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space systems. Policy 1 Tigard shall acauire. develop and maintain a diverse system of parks. trails. open space and recreational facilities that are safe. functional and accessible to all of its Population. Goal 8.2 Create a Citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road Pedestrian and bicycle trails. Policy 1 The City shall create an interconnected regional and local system of on- and off-road trails and Paths that link together neighborhoods. Parks. open spaces. maior urban activity centers and regional recreational opportunities utilizing both Public Property and easements on Private Property. The Plan includes multiple Projects that support the City's park system vision and recommendations. In particular. the Fanno Creek Park Improvements and Urban Green Spaces projects will upgrade and increase multimodal access to existing parks and open space areas and create new green space and recreational areas that will draw residents. shoppers and visitors to downtown Tigard. The Plan includes additional trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail Projects and the development of Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for residents and visitors to Tigard. C. Transportation System Plan Goals and Policies TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN—only additions are shown, all other findings remain the same. Where some of the goal and policy language is already existing, it 7 is not shown in double underline, new goal and policy information is shown in double underline. Goal 2 Transportation Efficiency— Develop and maintain a transportation system for the efficient movement of people and goods. Policy 9 The city shall require the provision of appropriate parking in balance with other transportation modes. The Plan includes streetscape improvements and bicycle/pedestrian system improvements designed to encourage alternative modes of transportation to the automobile. By filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system, installing new bike lanes and upgrading existing bikeways to standard, the Plan will help create a complete system of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that enables pedestrians and bicyclists to commute safely and efficiently to and within downtown. The Plan includes street improvements that will address motor vehicle needs in and around downtown Tigard. Projects such as the Scoffins Street/Hall Boulevard/Hunziker Realignment and Highway 99W intersection improvements will reduce congestion and improve circulation while creating a safer environment for drivers, pedestrians and bicyclists. The Plan includes trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail proiects and provides funding for the construction of new streets providing connectivity in the Area. The Plan also provides funding for a parking structure to serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the Downtown. 8 D. City of Tigard Park System Master Plan' Goal 1 Provide a wide variety of high auality bark and open spaces for all residents. including both: - Developed areas with facilities for active recreation: and - Undeveloped areas for nature-oriented recreation and the protection and enhancement of valuable natural resources within the parks and open space system. Goal 2 Create a Citywide network of interconnected on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle trails. Goal 3 Provide Tigard residents with a broad ranee of recreational. cultural and educational activities. The Plan includes multiple oroiects that support the City's Dark system vision and recommendations. In particular. the Fanno Creek Park Improvements and Urban Green Spaces oroiects will upgrade and increase multimodal access to existing Darks and open space areas and create new green space and recreational areas that will draw residents. shoppers and visitors to downtown Tigard. The Plan includes additional trail connections through the Tigard Heritage Trail and Fanno Creek Trail Droiects and the development of Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for residents and visitors to Tigard. E. Tigard Downtown Improvement Plan No changes to this section F. Affordable Housing Plan In 2019 the City of Tigard adopted the Affordable Housing Plan —Tigard Housing Strategy Implementation Plan. The purpose of the Tigard Housing Strategy Implementation Plan (THSIP) is to identify strategies and implementation steps needed to increase the supply and affordability of housing within the City of Tigard. The outcome of the oroiect will be recommendations for adoption of housing strategies and policies. including amendments to municipal and development code, to implement an Affordable Housing Plan. The THSIP identified tools to assist in the development of affordable housing. one of which was tax increment funds. There is a parks section in the Tigard Comprehensive Plan as well as a Tigard Park System Master Plan. Both are included as they differ slightly in their verbiage. 9 The Plan includes a proiect category of Affordable Housing Development Assistance to provide grants and technical assistance to help encourage the development of affordable housing in the Area. G. City of Tigard Strategic Plan 2020-2025 The City of Tigard Strategic Plan was adopted by City Council on September 22, 2020. The Vision of the Plan is: Tigard: An eauitable community that is walkable. healthy. and accessible for everyone These are the strategic priorities and supporting obiectives and actions from the Strategic Plan that connect to the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Strategic Priority 2. Create a well-connected. attractive. and accessible pedestrian network. 2.1 Create a well-connected pedestrian network that links all Tigard residents and businesses. 2.1 C. Identify and pursue new funding sources to build the pedestrian network. 2.1 D. Bring parks and trailheads within a 10-minute walk of every Tigard resident. 2.1 E. Expand the pedestrian network annually. 2.2 Tigard's pedestrian network is attractive accessible. safe and well-maintained. 2.2 B. Design the trail system to serve both recreational and active transportation purposes. Strategic Priority 3. Ensure development and growth support the vision. 3.1 Pursue land development that maximizes public health benefits while increasing connection between people and community destinations. 3.1 B. Locate and grow businesses to support walkability. connectivity. and accessibility for all business locations. 3.1 C. Build mixed-use development that is inclusive of housing. shopping, employment. services and integrates transportation options. 3.1 D. Fully implement the City's Complete Streets policy. 3.1 G. Invest in public spaces that equitably serve the city's diverse residents. workers. and visitors. 3.2 Focus development-associated resources in parts of the city that have the capacity to serve. house. employ and attract the most people with the least impact on Tigard's natural systems and the climate. 3.2 B. Facilitate Transit Oriented Development (TOD) that supports employment. housing. and community services. 3.3 Understand the effects of development on vulnerable Tigard residents and mitigate those impacts within proiects and over time. 3.3 C. Support a balanced. diverse mix of business sectors and employment opportunities. 3.3 D. Ensure transportation investments and improvements are providing eauitable benefits and impact to the entire population. 10 3.3 E. Advance equitable economic opportunity. 3.4 Proactively intervene as necessary to meet the housing needs of all community members. 3.4 A. Prioritize funds to support the creation and retention of affordable housing in Downtown Tigard. the Tigard Triangle and Washington Square. 3.4 D. Increase the housing mix in the city to meet the needs of smaller households. including singles. young families, and older adults. The City Center Urban Renewal Plan conforms to the City of Tigard Strategic Plan and implements many portions of the Strategic Plan. The Plan helps implement the strategic priority to "Create a well-connected and accessible pedestrian network" as proiects provide funding for increased trails and fornew streets providing connectivity in the Area. The Plan helps implement the strategic priority "Ensure development and growth supports the vision" as it includes the development of the Universal Plaza. a central gathering place for Tigard residents. In addition. the Plan provides structured parking and assistance for new mixed-use development including affordable housing development. VII. Proposed Land Uses This section is deleted in its entirety and replaced with new information. Land uses within the Area are governed by the City of Tigard Development Code. The Development Code establishes zoning districts that implement the Tigard Comprehensive Plan.The districts govern the allowed uses and contain development standards. Currently, land in thx Arca is within the Central Busincoo S�otrict(CBD), General Commercial {C G), Professional Commercial (C P), fl 1.5 Low Density Residential (R 1.9„ 11 12 Medium Density Residential (R 12) and R 25 Medium High D ruaity Residential (R 25) zoning districts. The purpose of the districts is described in the Development Code as follows: A,CwctrO l ess Dictrit "The CBD zoning district is designed to provide a concentrated central laxness district, centered on the City's historic downtown, including a mix of civic, retail and office uses. Single family attached housing, at a maximum density of 12 units/net acre, equivalent of the R 12 zoning district, and multi family pouring at a minimum density of 32 units/acre, equivalent to the R 40 zoning district, arc permitted outright. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to adult entertainment, utilities,facilities with drive up windows, medical centers, major event enter iinrrK2nt and gasoline stations, arc permitted conditionally." Most development in tho CBD is not subject tc minimu+r,etbacks. However, 20 foot front, side and r or yard setbacks arc required where a commerc$Q. Isco cJaktic-a residential zoning district. A max>m m ato coverage of Clr%:Jul ,: m'd-C,rnornI3ndscape requirement of 15% are required. With exception of buildings within 100 feet of any residential zoning districts, 11 where a 40 foot height restriction appli-, a maJeimum height of 80 feet is prescribed for development in t :_‘ CBD zone. Q General Commercial "Thc C G zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of retail, office and civic uscs with a .. _ . _ - _ . ._ . .. _ - - _ _ _ -- :, - :andel :..,cos arc limited to single family residences which arc located on the same site as a permitted use. A wide range of uses, including but not limited to acUt ontar ainment, automotive equipment repair and storage, mini warehousrec, u`ili:ies, heliports, mradical centers, major event entertainment, and gasoline stations, are permitted conditionally." Generally, devclrapmant in the C G zone is not subject to rrinim backs. However, 20 foot side and r ar yard setbacks arc required where the zone abutYa residential zoning district. A rryallir ucn cite coverage of C%, minimrs landscape requirement of ti%and r^raxir urs l ght limit of 15 feet arc also prescribed. C. Professional Commercial "The C P zoning district is designed to accommodate civic and business/professional services and eorspatibh support rrarv' - , - :., _ - -- - - .' _ _ _ . - - , estaurantc, in dose proximity to residential areas and major transportation facilities. Within the Tigard Triangle and Bull Mountain Road District, residential uscxxat a minis' n' density of 32 units/net acre, i.e., equivalent to the R 40 zoning district are permitted in conjunction with a commercial development. Heliports, medical centers, religix.,u institutions and utilities arc permitted conditionally. Developments in the C P zoning district aro intended to serve as a buffer between residential areas and more intensive commercial and industrial areas." With the exception of property abutting a residential zoning district, where 20 foot side and rear yard setbacks arc required, minimum setbacks arc not required in the C P Zone. A rrxu(imum sits coverage of 3%, minimum landscape requirement of ti%and rrxmimum la-e+ght limit of 15 feet are required of all development in the C P zone. "The R 4.5 zoning district is designed to accommodate detached single family homes with or without accessory residential units-at a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. Duplexes and attached single Tamil units-aro permitted conditionally. Some civic and inetitutional useciare also permitted conditionally." The minimum lot sine in the Il 1.S zone ranges from 7,500 square feet for detached housing units to 10,000 for duplexes. The average minimum lot width is 50 feet for detached unit lots and 90 feet for duplex lots. All residential develcpmont is subject to a maximum height of 30 feet an I n mum act scks of 20 feet (front yard), 5 feet(side yard) and 15 feet (r ar yard). A minimum distance of 20 feet between a property line and the front of a _arage is 12 also required.The Fl 1.5 zone dooc not impaso a nninin n Icndscapc req.-irornant or lot coverage standard. • 1 I .. ■ . . _ _ • _ • '. . "Thc R 12 zoning district is designed to accommodate a full range of housing typos eta nsinimrs lot size of 3,050 square feet. A wide range of civic and iry. tstutonal uses arc also permitted conditiorfally Multiple family dwv ling einitc in the R 12 zone arc subject tic rnimuns front and r ar yard setbacks of 20 feet and a rna.14..7slide yard setback of 10 feet. Single family dwelling units arc subjeot to minimum front and r or yard set oaks of 14 feet and a rsinimrs ide yard setback of 5 feet. For both multplo family and single family dwelling anitsya 30400t cotbaak is required for a side or r ar yard abutting a more restrictive zoning district. A r~'axim building height of 35 feet, maximum lot coverage of 80%and nsinimrs landscape requirement of 20%arc also specified. F. R 24 Medium High Density Residrntial C'istrict "The Il 25 zoning district is designed to accommodate existing housing of all types and new attached single family and multi family housing units-at a minimum lot size of 1,480 square feet. A limited arx unt of neighborhood commercial uses is permitted outr ght and a wide range of civic and institutional uses arc permitted conditionally." A minimum lot size of 3,050 square feet per unit for detached single family dwelling units and 6,100 square feet or 3,050 square feet per unit for duplexes is required in the R 25 zone. Multiple family dwelling units aro subject to minis'ns front and rear yard setbacks of 20 feet and a minimum side yard setback of 10 feet. Single family dwelling units-are subject to minimum front and rear yard setbacks of 14 feet and a minimum cede yard setback of 5 feet. For both multiple family and single family dwelling units,a 30 foot setback is required for a side or rear yard abutting a more restrictive zoning district. A rmitimum building height of 45 feot, maximum lot coverage of 80% and minimum landscape requirement of 20%arc also specified. General/Commercial CG -The C-G zone is designed to accommodate a full range of retail. office. and civic uses with a citywide and even regional trade area. Except where nonconforming. residential uses are limited to mixed-use developments.A wide range of uses. including but not limited to adult entertainment. automotive eauioment repair and storage. mini-warehouses. utilities. heliports. medical centers. maior event entertainment. and gasoline stations. are allowed conditionally. Mixed Use Central Business District U-CBD-The MU-CBD zone is designed to provide a pedestrian-friendly urban village in downtown Tigard. A wide variety of commercial. civic. employment. mixed-use. apartments. and rowhouses are allowed. 13 Industrial Park I-P - The I-P zone provides appropriate locations for combining light manufacturing. office. and small-scale commercial uses. such as restaurants. personal services. and fitness centers. in a campus-like setting with no nuisance characteristics such as noise. glare. odor. or vibration. Parks and Recreation Zone PR -The Parks and Recreation (PR) zone is applicable to all city-owned lands intended as parks. open space. and recreational facilities and may be applied within all comprehensive plan designations. City-owned parks. open space. and recreational facilities located in a plan district may retain or receive other than a PR zone designation if it better furthers the goals of the plan district. In addition. other public agencies may reauest a PR zone designation for areas that meet the purpose of the zone. VIII. Property Acquisition and Disposition Tri Met property - tax lot numbers 2S102AA04800 and 2S102AA04801 IX. Relocation Methods No changes to this section X. Tax Increment Financing of Plan The maximum amount of indebtedness that may be issued or incurred under the Plan, based upon good faith estimates of the scope and costs of projects in the Plan and the schedule for their completion is Twenty Two Million Dolkira and No Cents ($22,000,000). Forty-Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and No Cents (S42.800.000).This amount is the principal of such indebtedness and does not include interest or indebtedness incurred to refund or refinance existing indebtedness. XI. Duration of Plan No new indebtedness to be repaid with tax increment revenues may be incurred after the twentieth anniversary twenty-ninth anniversary of the effective date of the Plan. As is common practice in urban renewal plans in Oregon,tax increment revenues may continue to be collected beyond this date. Collection may continue until it is found that deposits in the Commission's debt service fund are sufficient to fully pay principal and interest on indebtedness issued during the twenty years following the effective date of the Plan, either through direct payment of the indebtedness or by payment of principal and interest on bonds or notes issued to finance the indebtedness.Tax increment revenues collected after the twentieth twenty-ninth anniversary of the Plan (FY 2034/20351 may only be used to retire outstanding debt.The Plan will be effective on the date that the County certifies the results of the election at which the Tigard voters approve the measure that referred an ordinance approving an urban renewal plan to the Tigard voters. 14 XII. Future Amendments to Plan No changes to this section 15 Report Accompanying the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Substantial Amendment Reviewed by the City of Tigard February 9, 2021 Ordinance No. To be sent to vote May 17, 2021 Consultant Team Elaine Howard Consulting, LLC Elaine Howard Scott Vanden Bos Tiberius Solutions LLC Nick Popenuk Ali Danko Rob Wyman 111 = IDATIGARD TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 4 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES 6 III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN 16 IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA 16 V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS 19 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT 20 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED 24 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN 29 IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 34 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA 42 XI. RELOCATION REPORT 42 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment I. INTRODUCTION The Report on the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment (Report) contains background information and project details that pertain to the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan (Plan) Amendment (Amendment). The Report is not a legal part of the Plan, but is intended to provide public information and support the findings made by the City Council as part of the approval of the Plan. The Report provides the analysis required to meet the standards of ORS 457.087, including financial feasibility. The format of the Report is based on this statute. The Report documents not only the proposed projects in the Plan, but also documents the existing conditions in the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area (Area). The Report provides only guidance on how the Plan might be implemented. As the Tigard City Center Development TCDA (TCDA) conducts its annual budget process each year, it has the authority to make adjustments to the assumptions in this Report, particularly in regard to forecast revenues and planned expenditures. The TCDA may allocate budgets differently, adjust the timing of the projects, decide to incur debt at different timeframes than projected in this Report, and make other changes, as allowed in the amendments section of the Plan. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 4 Figure 1—Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Area rQ a ■■0.■9♦♦♦ ♦♦ aa • • s a X, i 1 a w 1 — .♦ 20 D. ♦♦ ♦N d5\cw -73 ♦ •♦♦+ 0 aP ♦♦i ' ♦•'♦ ♦ • %♦♦ ♦ •• • .im :•• i♦A'� ♦♦ ♦` •• ♦♦ ;' i ♦• • c3'' it ■ •♦♦ i U. eS`a�� i • INV c; i 41. _♦♦ ♦• .N♦ • t♦i " S• �1 n 4 ♦ ■ 2jk i• `sGG � Qrii'd El♦. 4Clj, ■ ■ A♦♦ dm St•♦ i ♦ ♦♦ ♦ ■ IL■■ ■ M A■■■. ■ ■ Tigard City Center URA 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet I I I I Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard City Center Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 5 II. EXISTING PHYSICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND IMPACTS ON MUNICIPAL SERVICES This section of the Report describes existing conditions within the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area and the Amendment Area and documents the occurrence of"blighted areas," as defined by ORS 457.010(1). A. Physical Conditions The analysis in this section uses data from Washington County Assessor's office from 2016, when the amendment to increase acreage within the City Center Urban Renewal Area boundary was completed. There are not significant changes between 2016 and 2020. 1. Land Use The Tigard City Center Area is 228.96 acres, including 198 tax lots consisting of 185.60 acres and 43.36 acres of right of way. An analysis of property classification data for FYE 2016, from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation was used to determine the land use designation of tax lots in the Area as amended. By acreage, commercial use accounts for the largest land use within the area (51.51%). This is followed by exempt (28.11%) and multifamily residential (11.73%). The total land uses of the Area, by acreage and parcel, are shown in Table 1. Table 1— Existing Land Use of Area Land Use Total Total Percent Tax lots Acres of Acres Commercial 125 95.61 51.51% Exempt 30 52.18 28.11% Industrial 1 6.41 3.45% Multi-family Residential 11 21.78 11.73% Single Family Residential 18 5.45 2.94% Vacant 13 4.17 2.25% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 6 2. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations As illustrated in Table 2 and Figure 2—Area Zoning DesignationsFigure 2, the majority (67.56%) of the Area by acreage is zoned as Mixed Use Central Business District. Table 2— Existing Zoning Designations of Area Total Total Percent Zoning Tax lots Acres of Acres Mixed Use Central Business District (MU CBD) 187 125.40 67.56% MU CBD- Planned Development Overlay 1 15.1 8.14% General Commercial 5 21.61 11.64% Parks and Recreation 4 22.50 12.12% Industrial Park 1 0.99 0.53% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) and Metro RLIS 2016 Q1. As illustrated in Table 3 and Figure 3, 67.47% of the acreage is designated as Mixed Use Central Business District in the City of Tigard Comprehensive Plan. Table 3— Existing Comprehensive Plan Designations of Area Comprehensive Plan Designation Total Total Percent Tax lots Acres of Acres Mixed Use Central Business District 180 125.22 67.47% General Commercial 5 21.61 11.64% Open Space 12 37.78 20.36% Light Industrial 1 0.99 0.53% Total 198 185.60 100.00% Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2016) and Metro RLIS 2016 Q1. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 7 Figure 2—Area Zoning Designations Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Zoning Designations 11::::—..-m-H H° ISL :L� 1■V f : d. ��17 �♦ I\ ___ 0 ak T1* %FM. • 444‘ 4i* , i ii, , 411114,401F. 4,0"„Aga ,.,, . ..... 4,-., ...,. ,„,,. 4,,,,,.. sv-.. •� �?�S RA „Il �itt:t*ij - - . ak 4 ''.. #/ iiiiPo. S-- .•# V*4" 1 1 41. 1 \*** 4 • . ‘ .#* 74 1.111111111 1 • >4 i I I 14 # V •4 43 lim 2-4Y-••.*A\ \ . . Zoning ■ • „e • •. +o. ~` 1111 Mixed Use CBD- ■ ■ Planned Development ■■ a M Mixed Use CBD General Commercial Industrial Park Parks and Recreation • • D i ' t1i,limp ■ ■ City Center URA __ _ Miami 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard City Center Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 8 Figure 3—Area Comprehensive Plan Designations Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area Comprehensive Plan Designations • ■•x■S•• • • ••• • ■ 12.4 ■ .•• •# • t ;4 ..t.r......,,,,. • �L ... �� , /, �� i .v -4• .�,,�5�.�` 1 •`. i ..,_ �••• •• • •• a • ■ �• a ii r • •••••• ••• to • • •.•U..•■ . ■ ■ Comprehensive Plan r■w• 1 Mixed Use CBD General Commercial Light Industrial Open Space ■ ■ City Center URA ••••• 0 500 1,000 1,500 feet Source:2016 Amendment to the Tigard City Center Plan Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 9 B. Infrastructure This section identifies the existing conditions in the Area to assist in establishing blight. There are projects listed in City of Tigard Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Tigard Transportation Systems Plan that identify these existing conditions. This does not mean all of these projects are included in the urban renewal plan. The specific projects to be included in the urban renewal plan are not changed by this Amendment. They are listed in Table 11. 1. Transportation The CIP identifies transportation needs within the Area. Streets and Intersections There are significant transportation needs within the Area: Table 4—Transportation Needs in the Area Name Description Time Frame Cost Estimate Ash Ave railroad Extend Ash Avenue across the railroad crossing (Burnham tracks from Burnham to Commercial Near-term $3,000,000 to Commercial Street Hall Boulevard widening, Pacific Widen to up to 4/5 lanes, depending on 1 Highway to Fanno corridor plan Near-term $2,500,000 Creek New sidewalks, new asphaltic concrete Main Street Green and the collection and treatment of Street(Phase II) stormwater runoff using low impact Near-term $4,060,500 development approaches. Source:City of Tigard Transportation Systems Plan 1 As noted in Tigard staff review of this document,the TSP update will change the project description and likely increase the cost. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 10 2. Water The CIP identifies no water needs in the Area. 3. Storm water The CIP identifies one storm water project in the Area: 94045—Commercial Street Stormwater Facility Project Need: Stormwater treatment for a large existing untreated area to meet regional stormwater regulatory permit requirements, Healthy Streams Plan goals and provide mitigation for Main Street and other future projects. Project Description: Construct a stormwater facility, or facilities, to treat stormwater runoff from up to 47 acres that discharge into Fanno Creek meeting outfall-retrofitting goals identified in the regional Healthy Streams Plan. This will be coordinated with the Main Street Green Street Phase 2 Project. Total Project Cost: $376,000 4. Sewer The CIP identifies one sanitary sewer project in the Area: 93059— Downtown Sanitary Sewer Line Project Need: TV inspection shows rehabilitation is needed to protect sanitary sewer lines in sections of Downtown Tigard. The sanitary sewer in this Area was constructed in the 1960s and after years of monthly and quarterly cleaning, the pipe walls have become thin. Project Description: The full project is both inside and outside the Area. It will rehabilitate approximately 2,360 linear feet of sanitary sewer line in Pacific Highway from Hall Boulevard to Main Street and in Main Street from Pacific Highway to Commercial Street. A cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) trenchless method will be used to minimize traffic disruption. Total Project Cost: $355,000 5. Parks and Open Space The Parks and Open Space projects are: Universal Plaza -The project will provide a large public space that can be a venue for community events and will include a water feature, covered area, connection to Fanno Creek trail, restrooms, interpretive art, and other amenities. Total Project Cost: $4,010,000 Fanno Creek Overlook-The project will provide an overlook of Fanno Creek near Main Street and a new connection to the Fanno Creek Trail. Total Project Cost: $840,000 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 11 C. Social Conditions Data from the US Census Bureau is used to identify social conditions. The geographies used by the Census Bureau to summarize data do not strictly conform to the boundary of the Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area. As such, the Census Bureau geographies that most closely align with the Urban Renewal Area boundary are used. The Area is situated at the intersection of seven different Census block groups, each of which extend a great distance beyond the boundary of the Area, including significant residential populations that live adjacent to, but outside of the Area. Only three of the seven overlapping Census block groups include a significant amount of residential land uses within the Area. Thus, the demographic analysis is limited to those three block groups: block groups 1 and 2 in Census Tract 307 and block group 4 in Census Tract 308.01. These block groups have a total residential population of 2,924 as depicted in Tables 5 and 6. Again, the majority of this population lives in areas adjacent to but outside of the Area. The area has 27% Latinx residents. Eighty three percent of the residents identify as White alone. Table 5— Hispanic or Latino Origin by Race in the Area Race Number Percent Not Hispanic or Latino 2,147 73% White alone 1,757 60% Black or African American alone 29 1% Asian alone 108 4% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone 15 1% Two or more races 238 8% Hispanic or Latino 777 27% White alone 668 23% Asian alone 8 0% Some other race alone 65 2% Two or more races 36 1% Total 2,924 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 12 The largest age group in the area is 25 to 34 years, 18%, followed by 18 to 24 years at 15%. Table 6—Age in the Area Age Number Percent Under 5 years 184 6% 5 to 9 years 76 3% 10 to 14 years 173 6% 15 to 17 years 134 5% 18 to 24 years 429 15% 25 to 34 years 515 18% 35 to 44 years 408 14% 45 to 54 years 323 11% 55 to 64 years 369 13% 65 to 74 years 143 5% 75 to 84 years 144 5% 85 years and over 26 1% Total 2,924 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Twelve percent of the adult population in the Area has not achieved a high school diploma. Twenty-six percent of adult residents in the area have earned a bachelor's degree or higher, another 26% have some college experience without a degree, and an additional 22% have graduated from high school with no college experience. Table 7— Educational Attainment in the Area Education Number Percent Less than high school 228 12% High school graduate (includes equivalency) 428 22% Some college 499 26% Associate's degree 248 13% Bachelor's degree 395 20% Master's degree 125 6% Professional school degree - 0% Doctorate degree 5 0% Total 1,928 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 13 The majority of residents, 70%, travel less than 30 minutes to work, including those who worked at home. Table 8—Travel Time to Work in the Area Travel Time Number Percent Less than 10 minutes 301 21% 10 to 19 minutes 469 33% 20 to 29 minutes 222 16% 30 to 39 minutes 246 17% 40 to 59 minutes 87 6% 60 to 89 minutes 86 6% 90 or more minutes 8 1% Total 1,419 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 14 The majority of residents, 66%, drove alone to work. Table 9— Means of Transportation to Work in the Area Transportation Number Percent Drove alone 978 66% Carpooled 108 7% Public transportation (includes taxicab) 144 10% Motorcycle - 0% Bicycle 82 6% Walked 107 7% Other means - 0% Worked at home 60 4% Total 1,479 100% Source:US Census Bureau,Social Explorer,American Community Survey 2014-18 5-Year Estimates D. Economic Conditions 1. Taxable Value of Property within the Area The estimated total assessed value of the Area calculated with data from the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation for FYE 2020, including all real, personal, manufactured, and utility properties, is $168,286,420. 2. Building to Land Value Ratio An analysis of property values can be used to evaluate the economic condition of real estate investments in a given area. The relationship of a property's improvement value (the value of buildings and other improvements to the property) to its land value is generally an accurate indicator of the condition of real estate investments. This relationship is referred to as the "Improvement to Land Value Ratio," or "I:L." The values used are real market values. In urban renewal areas, the I:L is often used to measure the intensity of development or the extent to which an area has achieved its short- and long-term development objectives. Table 10 below shows the improvement to land ratios for properties within the Area. The majority of tax lots in the area that are not exempt (41.66% of the total acreage) have I:L ratios of less than 1.0. In other words, the improvements on these properties are worth less than the land they sit on. We identify a target I:L ratio of 2.0 for properties in this Area. Only 31 tax lots in the area, including 16.61% of the acreage have I:L ratios of 2.0 or more in FYE 2016. The Area as a whole, is underdeveloped and not contributing its full potential to the tax base in Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 15 Table 10— I:L Ratio of Parcels in the Area Tax lots Acres Percent of Acres Exempt 30 52.18 28.11% No Improvement Value 14 8.11 4.37% .01-.50 43 31.47 16.96% .51-.1.0 31 37.73 20.33% 1.01-1.5 25 17.77 9.57% 1.51-2.0 22 7.51 4.05% 2.01-2.5 3 2.03 1.09% 2.51-3.0 9 4.32 2.33% 3.01-4.0 13 8.26 4.45% >4.0 8 16.22 8.74% Total 198 185.6 100.00% Calculated by Tiberius Solutions LLC wit i source data from Washington County Office of Assessment and Taxation(EYE 2016). E. Impact on Municipal Services The fiscal impact of tax increment financing on taxing districts that levy taxes within the Area (affected taxing districts) is described in Section IX Impact of Tax Increment Financing of this Report. This subsection discusses the fiscal impacts resulting from potential increases in demand for municipal services. The properties within the Area are all within the city limits and future development and demand for services is anticipated in the Area. III. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF EACH URBAN RENEWAL AREA IN THE PLAN The reason for selecting the Area has not changed from prior Reports; it is to enhance the ability to fund improvements necessary to cure blight within the Area. IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE URBAN RENEWAL AREA The projects identified for additional funding are largely already identified in the verbiage of the Plan, but additional funding has been allocated. Following the categories in the Plan, they are shown below. 1. Construction of New Streets Construction of new streets to provide connectivity within the Area as identified by dashed lines on Figure4. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 16 Existing Conditions: The streets shown with dotted lines do not currently exist. Most block sizes in the Area are very large, which limits the amount of street frontage and limits connectivity for all modes of transportation particularly for pedestrians. Figure 4— Potential Future Streets in Area Downtown Connectivity Plan GAFF$ ,l�- Potential Future Streets Map �� cNI'i ce:41.t.......:"N's ��PaEp� Qp cp Ge -3Ta1 ,.,0 v r"/G • • • oT • • 00 ,0,,„,- P r 6 �� 'P 1 y,. i. • ;.. .• 0)' y •t • .. • • • :.. ` ••. • •ti • • • Downtown Street Character Types" db Upper Hall Boulevard" -Main Street Green Street Downtown Mixed Use 1 (Collector) -Downtown Mixed Use 2(Neighborhood) -Downtown Mixed Use 3(Upper Burnham) db Downtown Mixed Use 4(Lower Burnham) Urban Residential -Alley:Business 0 250 500 1,000 Feet C I I I I I I I 1 'Dashed Imes mdfcate proposed streets -Other Streets --Hail a auIevard is currently an ODOT facility ODOT's design standards may supersede these standards as fang ` HIHOIOx Railroads as it is an ODOT facility N Source:City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 17 2. Tigard Heritage Trail (Main Street to Hall Boulevard) This project will increase pedestrian access and provide new recreational opportunities for residents, workers, and visitors to downtown. The project will build a new path connecting Main Street to the existing multi-use trail that connects the Commuter Rail parking lot to Hall Boulevard, and include, historical/educational installations and other amenities. Existing Conditions: The Main Street to Tiedeman Avenue section of the Tigard Heritage Trail has been completed. Currently pedestrians who wish to continue on from Main Street to the multi-use path that connects to Hall Boulevard must walk through the Commuter Rail parking lot, most of which has no pedestrian path. 3. Fanno Creek Trail Improvements Improvements to the Fanno Creek Trail within the Area will include new trail connections, lighting, accessibility improvements, boardwalks, and wayfinding. Existing Conditions: The segment through the district is substandard. A new connection to the Universal plaza will be constructed. The deficiencies are: • Not designed or built to current local, regional, or state trail standard and generally too narrow to support the usage it sees today • Degraded asphalt surface (potential accessibility issues), with tree root heaving in some locations • Seasonal flooding • Lack of any lighting 4. Plazas: Universal Plaza The Universal Plaza project will provide a large public space that includes a water feature, covered area, connection to Fanno Creek trail, restrooms, and other amenities. Existing Conditions: This mostly vacant property owned by the TCDA is being used as a temporary public space. Conceptual plans for the new plaza have been completed. 5. Public Facilities: Parking Facility This project includes structured parking that would jointly serve employment uses as well as visitors and customers to the downtown. Existing Conditions: There is no structured parking in the Area. As uses intensify and as Universal Plaza is developed, additional traffic is anticipated in the Area. This structured parking would address that need. 6. Planning and Development Assistance: Affordable Housing Development Assistance Grants and technical assistance to encourage new regulated affordable housing and preservation of existing market affordable housing. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 18 Existing Conditions: The existing Plan allows for development assistance but does not specifically call out affordable housing. The need for the creation of affordable housing has been more widely recognized as an important component of the health of the city. The City of Tigard Affordable Housing Plan identified needs and strategies to address those needs. One of the tools to address the shortage of affordable housing is tax increment funds provided through urban renewal areas. 7. Finance Fees and Plan Administration This category allows for repayment of costs associated with implementation of the Plan, including but not limited to ongoing administration and financing costs associated with issuing long- and short-term debt, relocation costs, and other administrative costs. Existing Conditions: This Plan is being implemented by staff. To make the Plan components consistent with the Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Plan, a specific project category is now designated to provide for the ongoing administration of the Plan. V. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF EACH PROJECT AND THE SOURCES OF MONEYS TO PAY SUCH COSTS The estimated allocation of funds to specific projects shown in this Report are the best estimates of future expenditures at the time of preparation of the Amendment. The TCDA will be able to review and update the allocations on an annual basis when they prepare the annual budget. Nominal dollars are year of expenditure dollars inclusive of inflation, which is assumed to be 3.0% per year. Table 11— Projects to be Completed Using Urban Renewal Area Funds Projects (nominal $) (constant 2020 $) Public Spaces $ (7,461,020) $ (6,570,000) Street Improvements $ (3,883,900) $ (3,100,000) Streetscape $ (1,087,820) $ (725,000) Ped/Bike Facilities $ (1,999,605) $ (1,350,000) Public Facilities $ (6,556,200) $ (6,000,000) Parks $ (1,739,490) $ (1,150,000) Affordable Housing Dev Assistance $ (2,880,720) $ (1,950,000) Planning and Dev. Assistance $ (1,852,693) $ (1,480,000) Property Acquisition $ (5,649,780) $ (3,900,000) Administration $ (3,018,666) $ (2,120,642) Financing Fees $ (500,000) $ (380,103) Total Expenditures $ (36,629,894) $ (28,725,745) Source:Compiled by Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 19 VI. THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE FOR EACH PROJECT The projects will be ongoing and will be completed as directed by the TCDA. The Area is anticipated to complete all projects on or before FYE 2039 and have sufficient tax increment finance revenue to terminate the district in FYE 2049. Changes in market conditions could affect the assumed development schedule. However, the last day to incur debt, June 30, 2035, is to be set in the Plan and is part of the voter approval. Anticipated project completion dates are shown in Table 12. The TCDA may change the completion dates in their annual budgeting process or as project decisions are made in administering the urban renewal plan. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 20 Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars Resources Total FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029 Beginning Balance 4,132,306 2,264,962 805,820 927,127 97,374 209,608 410,469 158,157 128,336 Interest Earnings 77,827 20,662 11,325 4,029 4,636 487 1,048 2,052 791 642 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 7,419,761 1,339,894 319,197 393,334 132,781 211,523 304,642 157,941 269,580 388,720 Bond/Loan Proceeds 25,000,000 - - - 5,800,000 - - 4,200,000 - - Total Resources 32,497,588 5,492,862 2,595,484 1,203,183 6,864,544 309,385 515,298 4,770,462 428,527 517,699 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces (7,461,020) (1,591,000) (1,111,370) - - - - (4,418,170) - - Street Improvements (3,883,900) (1,100,000) (515,000) - - - - - - - Streetscape (1,087,820) (125,000) - - - - - - - - Ped/Bike Facilities (1,999,605) - - - - - - - (184,485) - Public Facilities (6,556,200) - - - (6,556,200) - - - - - Parks (1,739,490) - - - - - - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance (2,880,720) - - - - - - - - - Planning and Dev.Assistance (1,852,693) (330,000) (77,250) (185,658) - - - - - (95,010) Property Acquisition (5,649,780) - - - - - - - - - Administration (3,018,666) (81,900) (86,044) (90,398) (94,970) (99,777) (104,829) (110,135) (115,706) (121,561) Financing Fees (500,000) - - - (116,000) - - (84,000) - - Total Expenditures (36,629,894) (3,227,900) (1,789,664) (276,056) (6,767,170) (99,777) (104,829) (4,612,305) (300,191) (216,571) Ending Balance 2,264,962 805,820 927,127 97,374 209,608 410,469 158,157 128,336 301,128 Ending Balance/Inflation Index 2,264,962 782,350 873,906 89,114 186,235 354,066 132,448 104,347 237,707 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input rom City of Tigard. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 21 Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 2 Resources FYE 2030 FYE 2031 FYE 2032 FYE 2033 FYE 2034 FYE 2035 FYE 2036 FYE 2037 FYE 2038 FYE 2039 Beginning Balance 301,128 205,019 520,471 382,117 235,942 397,155 589,986 872,134 225,222 159,402 Interest Earnings 1,506 1,025 2,602 1,911 1,180 1,986 2,950 4,361 1,126 797 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 320,176 448,596 - - 315,615 469,810 450,932 491,965 535,797 581,601 Bond/Loan Proceeds 2,500,000 - - - - 12,500,000 - - - - Total Resources 3,122,810 654,640 523,073 384,028 552,737 13,368,951 1,043,867 1,368,460 762,145 741,800 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces - - - - - - - - - (340,480) Street Improvements - - - - - (2,268,900) - - - - Streetscape - - - - - - - (962,820) - - Ped/Bike Facilities - - - - - (1,815,120) - - - - Public Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Parks - - - - - (1,739,490) - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance (652,400) - - - - (1,815,120) - - (413,200) - Planning and Dev.Assistance (521,920) - - - - (642,855) - - - - Property Acquisition (1,565,760) - - - - (4,084,020) - - - - Administration (127,711) (134,169) (140,956) (148,086) (155,582) (163,460) (171,733) (180,418) (189,543) (199,135) Financing Fees (50,000) - - - - (250,000) - - - - Total Expenditures (2,917,791) (134,169) (140,956) (148,086) (155,582) (12,778,965) (171,733) (1,143,238) (602,743) (539,615) Ending Balance 205,019 520,471 382,117 235,942 397,155 589,986 872,134 225,222 159,402 202,185 Ending Balance/Inflation Index 157,126 387,284 276,056 165,492 270,449 390,048 559,778 140,352 96,444 118,765 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 22 .Table 12- Projects and Costs in Year of Expenditure Dollars, page 3 FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE FYE Resources 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 Beginning Balance 202,185 447,015 404,097 359,609 313,504 265,732 216,241 164,977 111,887 56,913 Interest Earnings 1,011 2,235 2,020 1,798 1,568 1,329 1,081 825 559 285 Transfer from Debt Service Fund 287,657 - - - - - - - - - Bond/Loan Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Total Resources 490,853 449,250 406,117 361,407 315,072 267,061 217,322 165,802 112,446 57,198 Expenditures(YOE$) Public Spaces - - - - - - - - - - Street Improvements - - - - - - - - - - Streetscape - - - - - - - - - - Ped/Bike Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Public Facilities - - - - - - - - - - Parks - - - - - - - - - - Affordable Housing Dev Assistance - - - - - - - - - - Planning and Dev.Assistance - - - - - - - - - - PropertyAcquisition - - - - - - - - - - Administration (43,838) (45,153) (46,508) (47,903) (49,340) (50,820) (52,345) (53,915) (55,533) (57,198) Financing Fees - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures (43,838) (45,153) (46,508) (47,903) (49,340) (50,820) (52,345) (53,915) (55,533) (57,198) Ending Balance 447,015 404,097 359,609 313,504 265,732 216,241 164,977 111,887 56,913 - Ending Balance/Inflation Index 254,927 223,740 193,307 163,616 134,643 106,376 78,793 51,881 25,621 - Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC with input from City of Tigard Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 23 VII. THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF TAX INCREMENT REVENUES REQUIRED AND THE ANTICIPATED YEAR IN WHICH INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE RETIRED Table 13 shows the allocation of tax increment revenues to debt service. Table 13 shows no new debt being incurred after FYE 2035, as required by the Plan. It is anticipated that the TCDA will have sufficient resources to retire all debt by FYE 2049, which would then allow the TCDA to cease collecting tax increment revenues and close down the Area. The time frame for retiring all debt for the Area is not absolute; it may vary depending on the actual terms of the indebtedness incurred and the actual tax increment revenues received. If the economy is slower, it may take longer to repay all debt; if the economy is more robust than the projections, it may take a shorter time period. The TCDA may decide to issue bonds or take on loans on a different schedule, and that will alter the financing assumptions, however the proposed Plan Amendment prohibits any new debt after FYE 2035. The maximum indebtedness of the Plan is $42,800,000 (Forty Two Million Eight Hundred Thousand dollars and no cents). The City of Tigard estimates that $10,375,574 of indebtedness has been incurred by the TCDA for the Area through the end of FYE 2020, resulting in $11,624,426 in remaining capacity from the original indebtedness for the Area. The capacity for projects, programs and administration starting in FYE 2021 is $36,629,894. The estimated amount of tax increment revenues necessary to service all debt is $52,469,918. This number is higher than the amount allocated to projects as it includes debt service payments (principal and interest) to pay for new debt and debt that was already incurred in the past, including projects that were already funded in prior fiscal years. Information on scheduled debt service payments for all existing debt was provided by the City of Tigard Finance Department. Additionally, we assume the TCDA will undertake four additional borrowings in future years to finance the costs of projects identified in the Plan. For speculative future borrowings, the amounts, timing, and terms of the debt are unknown. The assumptions used in this Report are for planning purposes only, and subject to change based on market conditions. These assumptions were developed by Tiberius Solutions LLC and informed by conversations with staff from the City of Tigard Finance Department and their financial advisor. Borrowing assumptions in later years (FYE 2030 and beyond) are more conservative than in earlier years (FYE 2021 through FYE 2029), to reflect greater financial uncertainty in later years. Specific key assumptions for the financial analysis include: • Debt Service Coverage Ratio: Payments for future indebtedness are structured so that annual tax increment revenues are projected to equal or exceed 1.1 x total annual debt service payments through FYE 2029. In FYE 2030 and thereafter, the projected minimum debt service coverage ratio increases to 1.25. • New Debt FYE 2024: Assumes principal amount of$5,800,000 with 4.0% interest rate, 30-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 24 • New Debt FYE 2027: Assumes principal amount of$4,200,000 with 4.0% interest rate, 30-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. • New Debt FYE 2030: Assumes principal amount of$2,500,000 with 4.5% interest rate, 20-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. • New Debt FYE 2035: Assumes principal amount of$12,500,000 with 4.5% interest rate, 20-year amortization period, level annual debt service payments, and no prepayment penalties. For all of the assumed future borrowings, it is forecast that excess tax increment revenues in later years (FYE 2040 and beyond) would allow for additional principal payments, allowing for the loans to be repaid ahead of schedule. The assumptions used in this analysis present just one potential scenario for the long-term cash flow of the Area. If actual results differ from these assumptions, it could affect the ability of the TCDA to achieve these projects at these dollar amounts on this schedule. Based on these assumptions, we find the Amendment financially feasible. There is a positive fund balance shown in FYE 2932 and FYE 2033. In these years the Area's outstanding debt has a balloon payment scheduled in FYE 2034, so the Debt Service Fund needs to accumulative sufficient resources to be able to pay that oversized debt payment. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 25 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund FYE Resources Total 2020 FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 Beginning Balance - 1,085,936 - - - - - - - Interest Earnings 14,894 - 5,430 - - - - - - - TIF:Current Year 51,685,982 581,197 646,142 716,136 788,323 863,038 940,367 1,031,836 1,126,965 1,238,265 TIF:Prior Years 783,936 9,177 8,718 9,692 10,742 11,825 12,946 14,106 15,478 16,904 Total Resources 52,484,812 590,374 1,746,226 725,828 799,065 874,862 953,312 1,045,942 1,142,442 1,255,169 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (6,764,129) - - - - (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) New Debt FYE 2027 (4,614,842) - - - - - - - (242,886) (242,886) New Debt FYE 2030 (3,267,236) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2035 (13,527,860) - - - - - - - - - Series 2019A (2,332,883) - (124,746) (124,858) (124,922) (124,940) (124,910) (124,834) (124,710) (125,538) Series 2019B (5,226,787) - (281,587) (281,773) (280,809) (281,726) (281,464) (281,052) (281,491) (281,750) Early Principal Payment - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2024 (2,539,427) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2027 (2,082,879) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2030 (515,784) - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2035 (4,688,785) - - - - - - - - - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (35,733,738) - (406,332) (406,630) (405,732) (742,081) (741,789) (741,300) (984,501) (985,589) Total Debt Service (45,560,613) - (406,332) (406,630) (405,732) (742,081) (741,789) (741,300) (984,501) (985,589) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.59 1.76 1.94 1.16 1.27 1.39 1.14 1.26 Transfer to Capital Improvements Fund (7,419,761) - (1,339,894) (319,197) (393,334) (132,781) (211,523) (304,642) (157,941) (269,580) Total Expenditures (52,980,374) - (1,746,226) (725,828) (799,065) (874,862) (953,312) (1,045,942) (1,142,442) (1,255,169) IEnding Balance - - - - - - - - I Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 26 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund, page 2 Resources FYE 2029 FYE 2030 FYE 2031 FYE 2032 FYE 2033 FYE 2034 FYE 2035 FYE 2036 FYE 2037 FYE 2038 Beginning Balance - - - - 583,071 1,309,840 - - - - Interest Earnings - - - - 2,915 6,549 - - - - TIF:Current Year 1,354,573 1,476,116 1,603,128 1,735,855 1,874,555 2,019,497 2,170,961 2,149,810 2,191,161 2,234,372 TIF:Prior Years 18,574 20,319 22,142 24,047 26,038 28,118 30,292 32,564 32,247 32,867 Total Resources 1,373,147 1,496,434 1,625,269 1,759,902 2,486,579 3,364,005 2,201,254 2,182,375 2,223,408 2,267,240 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) New Debt FYE 2027 (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) New Debt FYE 2030 - (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) Series 2019A (125,296) (125,007) (124,671) (125,287) (124,833) (708,331) - - - - Series 2019B (280,830) (280,760) (281,511) (281,053) (281,415) (1,569,568) - - - - Early Principal Payment - - - - - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2024 - - - - - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2027 - - - - - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2030 - - - - - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - - - - - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (984,427) (1,176,259) (1,176,673) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,048,390) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) Total Debt Service (984,427) (1,176,259) (1,176,673) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,048,390) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.38 1.25 1.36 1.48 1.59 0.66 1.25 1.24 1.27 1.29 Transfer to Capital Improvements Fund (388,720) (320,176) (448,596) - - (315,615) (469,810) (450,932) (491,965) (535,797) Total Expenditures (1,373,147) (1,496,434) (1,625,269) (1,176,831) (1,176,739) (3,364,005) (2,201,254) (2,182,375) (2,223,408) (2,267,240) I Ending Balance - - - 583,071 1,309,840 - - - - - I Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 27 Table 13-Tax Increment Revenues and Allocations to Debt Service Fund, page 3 FYE Resources FYE 2039 FYE 2040 FYE 2041 FYE 2042 FYE 2043 FYE 2044 FYE 2045 FYE 2046 FYE 2047 FYE 2048 2049 Beginning Balance - - - - - - - - - - - Interest Earnings - - - - - - - - - - - TIF:Current Year 2,279,528 2,326,716 2,376,028 2,427,558 2,481,407 2,537,680 2,596,484 2,657,935 2,612,500 2,612,500 35,347 TIF:Prior Years 33,516 34,193 34,901 35,640 36,413 37,221 38,065 38,947 39,869 39,188 39,188 Total Resources 2,313,044 2,360,909 2,410,928 2,463,198 2,517,821 2,574,901 2,634,550 2,696,883 2,652,369 2,651,688 74,535 Expenditures New Debt FYE 2024 (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (335,415) (55,838) - - - - - New Debt FYE 2027 (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) (242,886) - - - - New Debt FYE 2030 (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) (192,190) - -New Debt FYE 2035 (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (960,952) (74,535) Series 2019A - - - - - - - - - - - Series 2019B - - - - - - - - - - - Early Principal Payment - - - - - - - - - -New Debt FYE 2024 - (341,809) (679,485) (731,755) (786,377) - - - - - - New Debt FYE 2027 - - - - - (1,123,034) (959,845) - - - - New Debt FYE 2030 - - - - - - (278,676) (237,108) - -New Debt FYE 2035 - - - - - - - (1,306,632) (1,691,417) (1,690,736) - Total Debt Service,Scheduled Only (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,731,443) (1,451,867) (1,396,029) (1,153,142) (960,952) (960,952) (74,535) Total Debt Service (1,731,443) (2,073,252) (2,410,928) (2,463,198) (2,517,821) (2,574,901) (2,634,550) (2,696,883) (2,652,369) (2,651,688) (74,535) Debt Service Coverage Ratio 1.32 1.34 1.37 1.40 1.43 1.75 1.86 2.30 2.72 2.72 0.47 Transfer to URA Projects Fund (581,601) (287,657) - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures (2,313,044) (2,360,909) (2,410,928) (2,463,198) (2,517,821) (2,574,901) (2,634,550) (2,696,883) (2,652,369) (2,651,688) (74,535) Ending Balance - - - - - - - - - - - Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 28 VIII. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE PLAN The estimated tax increment revenues through FYE 2049 as shown above, are based on projections of the assessed value of development within the Area and the consolidated tax rate that will apply in the Area. The analysis assumes average annual growth in assessed value starting at 3.5% and increasing to 4.0% in FYE 2026 and 4.5% in FYE 2028. These growth rates assume both the appreciation of existing property values and new construction activity in the Area. Table 17 shows the projected incremental assessed value, tax rates, and tax increment revenues each year, adjusted for discounts, delinquencies, and compression losses. These projections of increment are the basis for the projections in Tables 12 and 13. Gross TIF is calculated by multiplying the tax rate times the excess value. The tax rate is stated per thousand dollars of assessed value, so the calculation is "tax rate times excess value divided by one thousand". The consolidated tax rate includes only permanent rate levies. Revenue sharing is part of the 2009 legislative changes to urban renewal and comes into effect when a substantial amendment to increase maximum indebtedness is approved. Revenue sharing means that, at thresholds defined in ORS 457.470, the impacted taxing jurisdictions will receive a share of the incremental growth in the District. The first threshold is 10% of the original maximum indebtedness ($2,200,000). At the 10%threshold, the Agency will receive the full 10% of the initial maximum indebtedness plus 25% of the increment above the 10% threshold and the taxing jurisdictions will receive 75% of the increment above the 10% threshold. Revenue sharing targets are projected to be reached in FYE 2036. If assessed value in the Area grows more quickly than projected, the revenue sharing triggers could be reached earlier. The second threshold is set at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness ($2,750,000). If this threshold is met, revenue for the district would be capped at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness, with all additional tax revenue being shared with affected taxing districts. This revenue sharing target is projected to be reached in FYE 2047. Projected Revenue Sharing is shown in Table 14 and specifically by taxing district in Table 15 and Table 16. The revenue sharing shown under the "shared-voluntary" column in FYE 2049 is not a result of meeting the revenue sharing triggers, but a result of reaching the maximum indebtedness the final year of the District, estimated in FYE 2049. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 29 Table 14 - Projected Revenue Sharing Gross TIF Shared - Shared - Final Gross FYE Mandatory Voluntary TIF for URA 2036 $188,874 $2,262,958 2037 $319,455 $2,306,485 2038 $455,912 $2,351,971 2039 $598,510 $2,399,503 2040 $747,525 $2,449,175 2041 $903,245 $2,501,082 2042 $1,065,972 $2,555,324 2043 $1,236,023 $2,612,008 2044 $1,413,725 $2,671,242 2045 $1,599,425 $2,733,142 2046 $1,793,480 $2,797,827 2047 $2,111,691 $2,750,000 2048 $2,394,243 $2,750,000 2049 $2,689,509 $2,712,792 $37,208 Total $17,517,592 $2,712,792 $33,177,924 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Table 15 - Projected Revenue Sharing by Taxing District -General Government Tigard Washington Port of Tualatin Valley Tualatin County SWC Tualatin Metro Portland Fire&Rescue City of Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2036 $35,215 $1,410 $1,513 $1,098 $23,888 $39,361 $1,410 $103,894 2037 $59,561 $2,384 $2,559 $1,857 $40,403 $66,574 $2,384 $175,723 2038 $85,003 $3,403 $3,652 $2,650 $57,662 $95,011 $3,403 $250,784 2039 $111,590 $4,467 $4,794 $3,479 $75,697 $124,728 $4,467 $329,222 2040 $139,374 $5,579 $5,988 $4,345 $94,544 $155,782 $5,579 $411,191 2041 $168,407 $6,741 $7,235 $5,251 $114,239 $188,233 $6,741 $496,848 2042 $198,747 $7,956 $8,539 $6,196 $134,820 $222,145 $7,956 $586,359 2043 $230,453 $9,225 $9,901 $7,185 $156,327 $257,583 $9,225 $679,899 2044 $263,585 $10,551 $11,325 $8,218 $178,802 $294,616 $10,551 $777,647 2045 $298,208 $11,937 $12,812 $9,297 $202,289 $333,315 $11,937 $879,795 2046 $334,389 $13,385 $14,367 $10,425 $226,832 $373,756 $13,385 $986,539 2047 $393,718 $15,760 $16,916 $12,275 $267,078 $440,070 $15,760 $1,161,577 2048 $446,399 $17,869 $19,179 $13,918 $302,814 $498,953 $17,869 $1,317,000 2049 $1,007,242 $40,318 $43,275 $31,404 $683,262 $1,125,823 $40,318 $2,971,642 Total $3,771,892 $150,983 $162,055 $117,599 $2,558,659 $4,215,949 $150,983 $11,128,120 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 30 Table 16 - Projected Revenue Sharing by Taxing District- Education Portland NW Tigard/Tualatin Community Regional SD College ESD Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2036 $78,142 $4,429 $2,409 $84,980 $188,874 2037 $132,167 $7,492 $4,074 $143,733 $319,455 2038 $188,623 $10,692 $5,815 $205,129 $455,912 2039 $247,619 $14,036 $7,633 $269,288 $598,510 2040 $309,270 $17,530 $9,534 $336,334 $747,525 2041 $373,696 $21,182 $11,520 $406,397 $903,245 2042 $441,020 $24,998 $13,595 $479,613 $1,065,972 2043 $511,374 $28,986 $15,764 $556,124 $1,236,023 2044 $584,894 $33,153 $18,030 $636,078 $1,413,725 2045 $661,723 $37,508 $20,399 $719,630 $1,599,425 2046 $742,009 $42,059 $22,874 $806,941 $1,793,480 2047 $873,661 $49,521 $26,932 $950,114 $2,111,691 2048 $990,560 $56,147 $30,536 $1,077,243 $2,394,243 2049 $2,235,071 $126,689 $68,900 $2,430,659 $5,402,302 Total $8,369,828 $474,422 $258,013 $9,102,264 $20,230,384 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 31 Table 17- Projected Incremental Assessed Value,Tax Rates, and Tax Increment Revenues, page 1 Assessed Value Increment Tax Increment Finance Dollars I Net Net Net FYE Total Frozen Base Used Unused Tax Rate Gross Adjustments (Current Year) (Prior Year) (Total) 2020 168,286,420 117,522,911 50,763,509 - 12.0517 611,787 (30,589) 581,197 9,177 590,374 2021 173,945,351 117,522,911 56,422,440 - 12.0546 680,150 (34,008) 646,142 8,718 654,860 2022 180,033,439 117,522,911 62,510,528 - 12.0592 753,827 (37,691) 716,136 9,692 725,828 2023 186,334,608 117,522,911 68,811,697 - 12.0592 829,814 (41,491) 788,323 10,742 799,065 2024 192,856,319 117,522,911 75,333,408 - 12.0592 908,461 (45,423) 863,038 11,825 874,862 2025 199,606,290 117,522,911 82,083,379 - 12.0592 989,860 (49,493) 940,367 12,946 953,312 2026 207,590,542 117,522,911 90,067,631 - 12.0592 1,086,144 (54,307) 1,031,836 14,106 1,045,942 2027 215,894,164 117,522,911 98,371,253 - 12.0592 1,186,279 (59,314) 1,126,965 15,478 1,142,442 2028 225,609,401 117,522,911 108,086,490 - 12.0592 1,303,437 (65,172) 1,238,265 16,904 1,255,169 2029 235,761,823 117,522,911 118,238,912 - 12.0592 1,425,867 (71,293) 1,354,573 18,574 1,373,147 2030 246,371,105 117,522,911 128,848,194 - 12.0592 1,553,806 (77,690) 1,476,116 20,319 1,496,434 2031 257,457,806 117,522,911 139,934,895 - 12.0592 1,687,503 (84,375) 1,603,128 22,142 1,625,269 2032 269,043,408 117,522,911 151,520,497 - 12.0592 1,827,216 (91,361) 1,735,855 24,047 1,759,902 2033 281,150,361 117,522,911 163,627,450 - 12.0592 1,973,216 (98,661) 1,874,555 26,038 1,900,593 2034 293,802,127 117,522,911 176,279,216 - 12.0592 2,125,786 (106,289) 2,019,497 28,118 2,047,615 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Notes:TIF is tax increment revenues Tax rates are expressed in terms of dollars per$1,000 of assessed value. Changes in total tax rates are due to increasing the Tualatin SWC rate to.0900 in FYE 2022 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 32 Table 18— Projected Incremental Assessed Value,Tax Rates, and Tax Increment Revenues, page 2 Assessed Value Increment Tax Increment Finance Dollars I Net Net Net FYE Total Frozen Base Used Unused Tax Rate Gross Adjustments (Current Year) (Prior Year) (Total) 2035 307,023,223 117,522,911 189,500,312 - 12.0592 2,285,222 (114,261) 2,170,961 30,292 2,201,254 2036 320,839,268 117,522,911 187,654,086 15,662,271 12.0592 2,262,958 (113,148) 2,149,810 32,564 2,182,375 2037 335,277,036 117,522,911 191,263,528 26,490,597 12.0592 2,306,485 (115,324) 2,191,161 32,247 2,223,408 2038 350,364,503 117,522,911 195,035,395 37,806,197 12.0592 2,351,971 (117,599) 2,234,372 32,867 2,267,240 2039 366,130,904 117,522,911 198,976,995 49,630,998 12.0592 2,399,503 (119,975) 2,279,528 33,516 2,313,044 2040 382,606,796 117,522,911 203,095,968 61,987,917 12.0592 2,449,175 (122,459) 2,326,716 34,193 2,360,909 2041 399,824,100 117,522,911 207,400,294 74,900,895 12.0592 2,501,082 (125,054) 2,376,028 34,901 2,410,928 2042 417,816,183 117,522,911 211,898,315 88,394,957 12.0592 2,555,324 (127,766) 2,427,558 35,640 2,463,198 2043 436,617,910 117,522,911 216,598,746 102,496,253 12.0592 2,612,008 (130,600) 2,481,407 36,413 2,517,821 2044 456,265,717 117,522,911 221,510,698 117,232,108 12.0592 2,671,242 (133,562) 2,537,680 37,221 2,574,901 2045 476,797,674 117,522,911 226,643,687 132,631,076 12.0592 2,733,142 (136,657) 2,596,484 38,065 2,634,550 2046 498,253,569 117,522,911 232,007,661 148,722,997 12.0592 2,797,827 (139,891) 2,657,935 38,947 2,696,883 2047 520,674,979 117,522,911 228,041,661 175,110,407 12.0592 2,750,000 (137,500) 2,612,500 39,869 2,652,369 2048 544,105,353 117,522,911 228,041,661 198,540,781 12.0592 2,750,000 (137,500) 2,612,500 39,188 2,651,688 2049 568,590,094 117,522,911 3,085,422 447,981,761 12.0592 37,208 (1,860) 35,347 39,188 74,535 Total 54,406,297 (2,720,315) 51,685,982 783,936 52,469,918 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Notes:TIF is tax increment revenues Tax rates are expressed in terms of dollars per$1,000 of assessed value. Changes in total tax rates are due to increasing the Tualatin SWC rate to.0900 in FYE 2022 Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 33 IX. IMPACT OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING This section describes the impact of tax increment financing of the Amendment (increased maximum indebtedness), both until and after the indebtedness is repaid, upon all entities levying taxes upon property in the urban renewal area. The impact of tax increment financing on overlapping taxing districts consists of the property tax revenues foregone on permanent rate levies as applied to the growth in assessed value in the Area. The projections for impacts on due to the increase in maximum indebtedness in this Amendment and are shown in Tables 19a and 19b. The impact of the Amendment on overlapping taxing districts is measured by the increase in annual tax increment revenues that would be foregone by those districts until all debt is repaid on the increased maximum indebtedness of$20,800,000. The estimated impacts of the original maximum indebtedness prior to this Amendment are shown in Tables 19c and 19d. These show incurring the full amount of original maximum indebtedness of$22 million in the original time frame of FYE 2026 and paying off all debt by FYE 2036. The estimated impacts for the full (original plus the increased) maximum indebtedness from this Amendment are shown in Tables 19e and 19f. All debt is incurred by FYE 2035 and paid off by FYE 2049. The Tigard Tualatin School District and the Northwest Regional Education Service District are not directly affected by the tax increment financing, but the amounts of their taxes divided for the urban renewal plan are shown in the following tables. Under current school funding law, property tax revenues are combined with State School Fund revenues to achieve per-student funding targets. Under this system, property taxes foregone, due to the use of tax increment financing, are substantially replaced with State School Fund revenues, as determined by a funding formula at the State level. General obligation bonds will not be impacted by this Amendment, because only bonds approved by voters prior to October 6, 2001 are affected by this Plan, and there are none remaining. Local option levies are not impacted by this Amendment. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 34 Table 19a - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Increased MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire City of Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2036 ($58,613) ($2,346) ($2,518) ($1,827) ($39,760) ($65,514) ($2,346) ($172,925) 2037 ($414,547) ($16,594) ($17,811) ($12,925) ($281,208) ($463,351) ($16,594) ($1,223,029) 2038 ($422,720) ($16,921) ($18,162) ($13,179) ($286,752) ($472,486) ($16,921) ($1,247,140) 2039 ($431,260) ($17,263) ($18,529) ($13,446) ($292,545) ($482,031) ($17,263) ($1,272,335) 2040 ($440,184) ($17,620) ($18,912) ($13,724) ($298,598) ($492,006) ($17,620) ($1,298,664) 2041 ($449,510) ($17,993) ($19,313) ($14,015) ($304,925) ($502,430) ($17,993) ($1,326,178) 2042 ($459,256) ($18,383) ($19,731) ($14,319) ($311,536) ($513,323) ($18,383) ($1,354,931) 2043 ($469,440) ($18,791) ($20,169) ($14,636) ($318,444) ($524,706) ($18,791) ($1,384,977) 2044 ($480,082) ($19,217) ($20,626) ($14,968) ($325,663) ($536,601) ($19,217) ($1,416,375) 2045 ($491,204) ($19,662) ($21,104) ($15,315) ($333,207) ($549,032) ($19,662) ($1,449,186) 2046 ($502,825) ($20,127) ($21,603) ($15,677) ($341,091) ($562,022) ($20,127) ($1,483,473) 2047 ($494,526) ($19,795) ($21,247) ($15,418) ($335,461) ($552,746) ($19,795) ($1,458,988) 2048 ($494,399) ($19,790) ($21,241) ($15,414) ($335,375) ($552,603) ($19,790) ($1,458,613) 2049 ($13,897) ($556) ($597) ($433) ($9,427) ($15,533) ($556) ($40,999) Total ($5,622,462) ($225,059) ($241,563) ($175,296) ($3,813,992) ($6,284,384) ($225,059) ($16,587,814) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 35 Table 19b- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Increased MI - Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2036 ($130,063) ($7,372) ($4,009) ($141,444) ($314,369) 2037 ($919,881) ($52,141) ($28,357) ($1,000,379) ($2,223,408) 2038 ($938,015) ($53,169) ($28,916) ($1,020,100) ($2,267,240) 2039 ($956,965) ($54,243) ($29,500) ($1,040,709) ($2,313,044) 2040 ($976,769) ($55,366) ($30,110) ($1,062,245) ($2,360,909) 2041 ($997,463) ($56,539) ($30,748) ($1,084,750) ($2,410,928) 2042 ($1,019,088) ($57,764) ($31,415) ($1,108,268) ($2,463,198) 2043 ($1,041,687) ($59,045) ($32,112) ($1,132,844) ($2,517,821) 2044 ($1,065,302) ($60,384) ($32,840) ($1,158,526) ($2,574,901) 2045 ($1,089,981) ($61,783) ($33,600) ($1,185,364) ($2,634,550) 2046 ($1,115,769) ($63,245) ($34,395) ($1,213,409) ($2,696,883) 2047 ($1,097,353) ($62,201) ($33,828) ($1,193,381) ($2,652,369) 2048 ($1,097,071) ($62,185) ($33,819) ($1,193,075) ($2,651,688) 2049 ($30,837) ($1,748) ($951) ($33,535) ($74,535) Total ($12,476,244) ($707,184) ($384,600) ($13,568,028) ($30,155,842) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 36 Table 19c- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Original MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire City of Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2020 ($110,142) ($4,041) ($4,732) ($3,434) ($74,715) ($123,109) ($4,409) ($324,582) 2021 ($122,143) ($4,639) ($5,248) ($3,808) ($82,856) ($136,523) ($4,889) ($360,106) 2022 ($135,328) ($5,417) ($5,814) ($4,219) ($91,800) ($151,260) ($5,417) ($399,256) 2023 ($148,983) ($5,964) ($6,401) ($4,645) ($101,063) ($166,523) ($5,964) ($439,542) 2024 ($163,115) ($6,529) ($7,008) ($5,086) ($110,649) ($182,319) ($6,529) ($481,235) 2025 ($177,742) ($7,115) ($7,636) ($5,542) ($120,571) ($198,667) ($7,115) ($524,388) 2026 ($195,013) ($7,806) ($8,379) ($6,080) ($132,287) ($217,971) ($7,806) ($575,341) 2027 ($213,005) ($8,526) ($9,152) ($6,641) ($144,492) ($238,081) ($8,526) ($628,423) 2028 ($234,022) ($9,368) ($10,055) ($7,296) ($158,749) ($261,573) ($9,368) ($690,430) 2029 ($256,019) ($10,248) ($11,000) ($7,982) ($173,670) ($286,160) ($10,248) ($755,327) 2030 ($279,006) ($11,168) ($11,987) ($8,699) ($189,263) ($311,852) ($11,168) ($823,143) 2031 ($303,026) ($12,130) ($13,019) ($9,448) ($205,558) ($338,701) ($12,130) ($894,011) 2032 ($328,128) ($13,134) ($14,098) ($10,230) ($222,585) ($366,758) ($13,134) ($968,069) 2033 ($354,360) ($14,184) ($15,225) ($11,048) ($240,380) ($396,078) ($14,184) ($1,045,459) 2034 ($381,771) ($15,282) ($16,402) ($11,903) ($258,974) ($426,717) ($15,282) ($1,126,331) 2035 ($410,417) ($16,428) ($17,633) ($12,796) ($278,406) ($458,734) ($16,428) ($1,210,843) 2036 ($348,284) ($13,941) ($14,964) ($10,859) ($236,258) ($389,287) ($13,941) ($1,027,533) Total ($4,160,505) ($165,921) ($178,751) ($129,715) ($2,822,274) ($4,650,313) ($166,539) ($12,274,019) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 37 Table 19d - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Original MI - Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2020 ($244,405) ($13,853) ($7,534) ($265,793) ($590,374) 2021 ($271,036) ($15,363) ($8,355) ($294,754) ($654,860) 2022 ($300,294) ($17,021) ($9,257) ($326,572) ($725,828) 2023 ($330,594) ($18,739) ($10,191) ($359,524) ($799,065) 2024 ($361,953) ($20,516) ($11,158) ($393,627) ($874,862) 2025 ($394,410) ($22,356) ($12,158) ($428,924) ($953,312) 2026 ($432,733) ($24,528) ($13,340) ($470,601) ($1,045,942) 2027 ($472,658) ($26,791) ($14,570) ($514,019) ($1,142,442) 2028 ($519,296) ($29,435) ($16,008) ($564,739) ($1,255,169) 2029 ($568,106) ($32,202) ($17,513) ($617,821) ($1,373,147) 2030 ($619,113) ($35,093) ($19,085) ($673,291) ($1,496,434) 2031 ($672,416) ($38,114) ($20,728) ($731,258) ($1,625,269) 2032 ($728,117) ($41,271) ($22,445) ($791,833) ($1,759,902) 2033 ($786,324) ($44,571) ($24,240) ($855,135) ($1,900,593) 2034 ($847,151) ($48,019) ($26,115) ($921,284) ($2,047,615) 2035 ($910,715) ($51,622) ($28,074) ($990,411) ($2,201,254) 2036 ($772,842) ($43,807) ($23,824) ($840,472) ($1,868,005) Total ($9,232,161) ($523,301) ($284,596) ($10,040,058) ($22,314,077) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 38 Table 19e- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Full Impact (Original and Increased) MI -General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue City of Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2020 ($110,142) ($4,041) ($4,732) ($3,434) ($74,715) ($123,109) ($4,409) ($324,582) 2021 ($122,143) ($4,639) ($5,248) ($3,808) ($82,856) ($136,523) ($4,889) ($360,106) 2022 ($135,328) ($5,417) ($5,814) ($4,219) ($91,800) ($151,260) ($5,417) ($399,256) 2023 ($148,983) ($5,964) ($6,401) ($4,645) ($101,063) ($166,523) ($5,964) ($439,542) 2024 ($163,115) ($6,529) ($7,008) ($5,086) ($110,649) ($182,319) ($6,529) ($481,235) 2025 ($177,742) ($7,115) ($7,636) ($5,542) ($120,571) ($198,667) ($7,115) ($524,388) 2026 ($195,013) ($7,806) ($8,379) ($6,080) ($132,287) ($217,971) ($7,806) ($575,341) 2027 ($213,005) ($8,526) ($9,152) ($6,641) ($144,492) ($238,081) ($8,526) ($628,423) 2028 ($234,022) ($9,368) ($10,055) ($7,296) ($158,749) ($261,573) ($9,368) ($690,430) 2029 ($256,019) ($10,248) ($11,000) ($7,982) ($173,670) ($286,160) ($10,248) ($755,327) 2030 ($279,006) ($11,168) ($11,987) ($8,699) ($189,263) ($311,852) ($11,168) ($823,143) 2031 ($303,026) ($12,130) ($13,019) ($9,448) ($205,558) ($338,701) ($12,130) ($894,011) 2032 ($328,128) ($13,134) ($14,098) ($10,230) ($222,585) ($366,758) ($13,134) ($968,069) 2033 ($354,360) ($14,184) ($15,225) ($11,048) ($240,380) ($396,078) ($14,184) ($1,045,459) 2034 ($381,771) ($15,282) ($16,402) ($11,903) ($258,974) ($426,717) ($15,282) ($1,126,331) 2035 ($410,417) ($16,428) ($17,633) ($12,796) ($278,406) ($458,734) ($16,428) ($1,210,843) 2036 ($406,897) ($16,287) ($17,482) ($12,686) ($276,018) ($454,800) ($16,287) ($1,200,458) 2037 ($414,547) ($16,594) ($17,811) ($12,925) ($281,208) ($463,351) ($16,594) ($1,223,029) 2038 ($422,720) ($16,921) ($18,162) ($13,179) ($286,752) ($472,486) ($16,921) ($1,247,140) 2039 ($431,260) ($17,263) ($18,529) ($13,446) ($292,545) ($482,031) ($17,263) ($1,272,335) 2040 ($440,184) ($17,620) ($18,912) ($13,724) ($298,598) ($492,006) ($17,620) ($1,298,664) 2041 ($449,510) ($17,993) ($19,313) ($14,015) ($304,925) ($502,430) ($17,993) ($1,326,178) 2042 ($459,256) ($18,383) ($19,731) ($14,319) ($311,536) ($513,323) ($18,383) ($1,354,931) 2043 ($469,440) ($18,791) ($20,169) ($14,636) ($318,444) ($524,706) ($18,791) ($1,384,977) 2044 ($480,082) ($19,217) ($20,626) ($14,968) ($325,663) ($536,601) ($19,217) ($1,416,375) 2045 ($491,204) ($19,662) ($21,104) ($15,315) ($333,207) ($549,032) ($19,662) ($1,449,186) 2046 ($502,825) ($20,127) ($21,603) ($15,677) ($341,091) ($562,022) ($20,127) ($1,483,473) 2047 ($494,526) ($19,795) ($21,247) ($15,418) ($335,461) ($552,746) ($19,795) ($1,458,988) 2048 ($494,399) ($19,790) ($21,241) ($15,414) ($335,375) ($552,603) ($19,790) ($1,458,613) 2049 ($13,897) ($556) ($597) ($433) ($9,427) ($15,533) ($556) ($40,999) Total ($9,782,967) ($390,980) ($420,314) ($305,011) ($6,636,266) ($10,934,697) ($391,597) ($28,861,832) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 39 Table 19f- Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Full MI (Original and Increased)- Education NW Regional Portland Education Tigard/Tualatin Community Service School District College District Subtotal Total FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Education All 2020 ($244,405) ($13,853) ($7,534) ($265,793) ($590,374) 2021 ($271,036) ($15,363) ($8,355) ($294,754) ($654,860) 2022 ($300,294) ($17,021) ($9,257) ($326,572) ($725,828) 2023 ($330,594) ($18,739) ($10,191) ($359,524) ($799,065) 2024 ($361,953) ($20,516) ($11,158) ($393,627) ($874,862) 2025 ($394,410) ($22,356) ($12,158) ($428,924) ($953,312) 2026 ($432,733) ($24,528) ($13,340) ($470,601) ($1,045,942) 2027 ($472,658) ($26,791) ($14,570) ($514,019) ($1,142,442) 2028 ($519,296) ($29,435) ($16,008) ($564,739) ($1,255,169) 2029 ($568,106) ($32,202) ($17,513) ($617,821) ($1,373,147) 2030 ($619,113) ($35,093) ($19,085) ($673,291) ($1,496,434) 2031 ($672,416) ($38,114) ($20,728) ($731,258) ($1,625,269) 2032 ($728,117) ($41,271) ($22,445) ($791,833) ($1,759,902) 2033 ($786,324) ($44,571) ($24,240) ($855,135) ($1,900,593) 2034 ($847,151) ($48,019) ($26,115) ($921,284) ($2,047,615) 2035 ($910,715) ($51,622) ($28,074) ($990,411) ($2,201,254) 2036 ($902,904) ($51,179) ($27,833) ($981,917) ($2,182,375) 2037 ($919,881) ($52,141) ($28,357) ($1,000,379) ($2,223,408) 2038 ($938,015) ($53,169) ($28,916) ($1,020,100) ($2,267,240) 2039 ($956,965) ($54,243) ($29,500) ($1,040,709) ($2,313,044) 2040 ($976,769) ($55,366) ($30,110) ($1,062,245) ($2,360,909) 2041 ($997,463) ($56,539) ($30,748) ($1,084,750) ($2,410,928) 2042 ($1,019,088) ($57,764) ($31,415) ($1,108,268) ($2,463,198) 2043 ($1,041,687) ($59,045) ($32,112) ($1,132,844) ($2,517,821) 2044 ($1,065,302) ($60,384) ($32,840) ($1,158,526) ($2,574,901) 2045 ($1,089,981) ($61,783) ($33,600) ($1,185,364) ($2,634,550) 2046 ($1,115,769) ($63,245) ($34,395) ($1,213,409) ($2,696,883) 2047 ($1,097,353) ($62,201) ($33,828) ($1,193,381) ($2,652,369) 2048 ($1,097,071) ($62,185) ($33,819) ($1,193,075) ($2,651,688) 2049 ($30,837) ($1,748) ($951) ($33,535) ($74,535) Total ($21,708,405) ($1,230,485) ($669,196) ($23,608,086) ($52,469,918) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC.Please refer to the explanation of the schools funding in the preceding section Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 40 Table 20 shows the projected increased revenue to the taxing jurisdictions after tax increment proceeds are projected to be terminated. These projections are for FYE 2050. Table 20—Additional Revenues Obtained after Termination of Tax Increment Financing Tax Revenue in FYE 2050(year after termination) Tax From Frozen From Excess Taxing District Rate Base Value Total General Government Washington County 2.2484 $264,239 $1,071,708 $1,335,947 Soil and Water Conservation Tualatin 0.0900 $10,577 $42,899 $53,476 Metro 0.0966 $11,353 $46,044 $57,397 Port of Portland 0.0701 $8,239 $33,413 $41,652 Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue 1.5252 $179,246 $726,993 $906,239 City of Tigard 2.5131 $295,347 $1,197,879 $1,493,226 Tigard Tualatin Aquatic 0.0900 $10,577 $42,899 $53,476 Subtotal 6.6334 $779,578 $3,161,835 $3,941,413 Education Tigard/Tualatin School District 4.9892 $586,345 $2,378,121 $2,964,466 Portland Community College 0.2828 $33,236 $134,798 $168,034 NW Regional Education Service District 0.1538 $18,075 $73,309 $91,384 Subtotal 5.4258 $637,656 $2,586,228 $3,223,884 Total 12.0592 $1,417,234 $5,748,063 $7,165,297 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 41 X. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY LIMITS ON ASSESSED VALUE AND SIZE OF URBAN RENEWAL AREA State law limits the percentage of both a municipality's total assessed value and the total land area that can be contained in an urban renewal area at the time of its establishment to 15%for municipalities having a population of more than 50,000 according to the latest state census. Tigard's population eclipsed the 50,000 mark in 2019 as shown by the Portland State University Annual Population Report Tables. As noted below, the frozen base, including all real, personal, personal, manufactured, and utility properties in the Area, is $117,522,911. The total assessed value of the City of Tigard, minus excess value of the existing urban renewal areas is $6,954,974,807. Excess value is the assessed value created above the frozen base in the urban renewal area. The total urban renewal assessed value is 7.8% of the total assessed value of the City, minus excess value. This is below the 15% statutory limitation. The Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Area contains 228.96 acres, including right-of-way, and the City of Tigard contains 8,129 acres. After accounting for the acreage in the potential Tigard Triangle Urban Renewal Area, 9.56 % of the City's acreage would be in an urban renewal area. This is below the 15% statutory limitation. Table 21— Urban Renewal Area Conformance with Assessed Value and Acreage Limits Assessed Value UR Excess Acreage City of Tigard $7,046,400,810 8,129 City of Tigard minus UR excess $6,954,974,807 Tigard City Center $117,522,911 $50,763,509 228.96 Tigard Triangle $424,744,405 $40,662,494 547.90 City Center Plus Tigard Triangle $542,267,316 $91,426,003 776.86 Percentage in Urban Renewal 7.8% 9.56% Source:Compiled by Elaine Howard Consulting,LLC with data from City of Tigard and Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation(FYE 2020) XI. RELOCATION REPORT There is no relocation report required for the Plan. No specific acquisitions that would result in relocation benefits have been identified, however, there are plans to acquire land for infrastructure which may trigger relocation benefits in the future in the Area. Report on Tigard City Center Urban Renewal Plan Amendment 42 Exhibit C - General Government Taxing District Impacts Table 1 - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Increased MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire City of Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2036 ($58,613) ($2,346) ($2,518) ($1,827) ($39,760) ($65,514) ($2,346) ($172,925) 2037 ($414,547) ($16,594) ($17,811) ($12,925) ($281,208) ($463,351) ($16,594) ($1,223,029) 2038 ($422,720) ($16,921) ($18,162) ($13,179) ($286,752) ($472,486) ($16,921) ($1,247,140) 2039 ($431,260) ($17,263) ($18,529) ($13,446) ($292,545) ($482,031) ($17,263) ($1,272,335) 2040 ($440,184) ($17,620) ($18,912) ($13,724) ($298,598) ($492,006) ($17,620) ($1,298,664) 2041 ($449,510) ($17,993) ($19,313) ($14,015) ($304,925) ($502,430) ($17,993) ($1,326,178) 2042 ($459,256) ($18,383) ($19,731) ($14,319) ($311,536) ($513,323) ($18,383) ($1,354,931) 2043 ($469,440) ($18,791) ($20,169) ($14,636) ($318,444) ($524,706) ($18,791) ($1,384,977) 2044 ($480,082) ($19,217) ($20,626) ($14,968) ($325,663) ($536,601) ($19,217) ($1,416,375) 2045 ($491,204) ($19,662) ($21,104) ($15,315) ($333,207) ($549,032) ($19,662) ($1,449,186) 2046 ($502,825) ($20,127) ($21,603) ($15,677) ($341,091) ($562,022) ($20,127) ($1,483,473) 2047 ($494,526) ($19,795) ($21,247) ($15,418) ($335,461) ($552,746) ($19,795) ($1,458,988) 2048 ($494,399) ($19,790) ($21,241) ($15,414) ($335,375) ($552,603) ($19,790) ($1,458,613) 2049 ($13,897) ($556) ($597) ($433) ($9,427) ($15,533) ($556) ($40,999) Total ($5,622,462) ($225,059) ($241,563) ($175,296) ($3,813,992) ($6,284,384) ($225,059) ($16,587,814) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Table 2 - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Original MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire City of Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2020 ($110,142) ($4,041) ($4,732) ($3,434) ($74,715) ($123,109) ($4,409) ($324,582) 2021 ($122,143) ($4,639) ($5,248) ($3,808) ($82,856) ($136,523) ($4,889) ($360,106) 2022 ($135,328) ($5,417) ($5,814) ($4,219) ($91,800) ($151,260) ($5,417) ($399,256) 2023 ($148,983) ($5,964) ($6,401) ($4,645) ($101,063) ($166,523) ($5,964) ($439,542) 2024 ($163,115) ($6,529) ($7,008) ($5,086) ($110,649) ($182,319) ($6,529) ($481,235) 2025 ($177,742) ($7,115) ($7,636) ($5,542) ($120,571) ($198,667) ($7,115) ($524,388) 2026 ($195,013) ($7,806) ($8,379) ($6,080) ($132,287) ($217,971) ($7,806) ($575,341) 2027 ($213,005) ($8,526) ($9,152) ($6,641) ($144,492) ($238,081) ($8,526) ($628,423) 2028 ($234,022) ($9,368) ($10,055) ($7,296) ($158,749) ($261,573) ($9,368) ($690,430) 2029 ($256,019) ($10,248) ($11,000) ($7,982) ($173,670) ($286,160) ($10,248) ($755,327) 2030 ($279,006) ($11,168) ($11,987) ($8,699) ($189,263) ($311,852) ($11,168) ($823,143) 2031 ($303,026) ($12,130) ($13,019) ($9,448) ($205,558) ($338,701) ($12,130) ($894,011) 2032 ($328,128) ($13,134) ($14,098) ($10,230) ($222,585) ($366,758) ($13,134) ($968,069) 2033 ($354,360) ($14,184) ($15,225) ($11,048) ($240,380) ($396,078) ($14,184) ($1,045,459) 2034 ($381,771) ($15,282) ($16,402) ($11,903) ($258,974) ($426,717) ($15,282) ($1,126,331) 2035 ($410,417) ($16,428) ($17,633) ($12,796) ($278,406) ($458,734) ($16,428) ($1,210,843) 2036 ($348,284) ($13,941) ($14,964) ($10,859) ($236,258) ($389,287) ($13,941) ($1,027,533) Total ($4,160,505) ($165,921) ($178,751) ($129,715) ($2,822,274) ($4,650,313) ($166,539) ($12,274,019) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC. Table 3 - Projected Impact on Taxing District Permanent Rate Levies of Full Impact (Original and Increased) MI - General Government Soil/Water Tualatin Tigard Washington Conservation Port of Valley Fire Tualatin County Tualatin Metro Portland &Rescue City of Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2020 ($110,142) ($4,041) ($4,732) ($3,434) ($74,715) ($123,109) ($4,409) ($324,582) 2021 ($122,143) ($4,639) ($5,248) ($3,808) ($82,856) ($136,523) ($4,889) ($360,106) 2022 ($135,328) ($5,417) ($5,814) ($4,219) ($91,800) ($151,260) ($5,417) ($399,256) 2023 ($148,983) ($5,964) ($6,401) ($4,645) ($101,063) ($166,523) ($5,964) ($439,542) 2024 ($163,115) ($6,529) ($7,008) ($5,086) ($110,649) ($182,319) ($6,529) ($481,235) 2025 ($177,742) ($7,115) ($7,636) ($5,542) ($120,571) ($198,667) ($7,115) ($524,388) 2026 ($195,013) ($7,806) ($8,379) ($6,080) ($132,287) ($217,971) ($7,806) ($575,341) 2027 ($213,005) ($8,526) ($9,152) ($6,641) ($144,492) ($238,081) ($8,526) ($628,423) 2028 ($234,022) ($9,368) ($10,055) ($7,296) ($158,749) ($261,573) ($9,368) ($690,430) 2029 ($256,019) ($10,248) ($11,000) ($7,982) ($173,670) ($286,160) ($10,248) ($755,327) 2030 ($279,006) ($11,168) ($11,987) ($8,699) ($189,263) ($311,852) ($11,168) ($823,143) 2031 ($303,026) ($12,130) ($13,019) ($9,448) ($205,558) ($338,701) ($12,130) ($894,011) 2032 ($328,128) ($13,134) ($14,098) ($10,230) ($222,585) ($366,758) ($13,134) ($968,069) 2033 ($354,360) ($14,184) ($15,225) ($11,048) ($240,380) ($396,078) ($14,184) ($1,045,459) 2034 ($381,771) ($15,282) ($16,402) ($11,903) ($258,974) ($426,717) ($15,282) ($1,126,331) 2035 ($410,417) ($16,428) ($17,633) ($12,796) ($278,406) ($458,734) ($16,428) ($1,210,843) 2036 ($406,897) ($16,287) ($17,482) ($12,686) ($276,018) ($454,800) ($16,287) ($1,200,458) 2037 ($414,547) ($16,594) ($17,811) ($12,925) ($281,208) ($463,351) ($16,594) ($1,223,029) 2038 ($422,720) ($16,921) ($18,162) ($13,179) ($286,752) ($472,486) ($16,921) ($1,247,140) 2039 ($431,260) ($17,263) ($18,529) ($13,446) ($292,545) ($482,031) ($17,263) ($1,272,335) 2040 ($440,184) ($17,620) ($18,912) ($13,724) ($298,598) ($492,006) ($17,620) ($1,298,664) 2041 ($449,510) ($17,993) ($19,313) ($14,015) ($304,925) ($502,430) ($17,993) ($1,326,178) 2042 ($459,256) ($18,383) ($19,731) ($14,319) ($311,536) ($513,323) ($18,383) ($1,354,931) 2043 ($469,440) ($18,791) ($20,169) ($14,636) ($318,444) ($524,706) ($18,791) ($1,384,977) 2044 ($480,082) ($19,217) ($20,626) ($14,968) ($325,663) ($536,601) ($19,217) ($1,416,375) 2045 ($491,204) ($19,662) ($21,104) ($15,315) ($333,207) ($549,032) ($19,662) ($1,449,186) 2046 ($502,825) ($20,127) ($21,603) ($15,677) ($341,091) ($562,022) ($20,127) ($1,483,473) 2047 ($494,526) ($19,795) ($21,247) ($15,418) ($335,461) ($552,746) ($19,795) ($1,458,988) 2048 ($494,399) ($19,790) ($21,241) ($15,414) ($335,375) ($552,603) ($19,790) ($1,458,613) 2049 ($13,897) ($556) ($597) ($433) ($9,427) ($15,533) ($556) ($40,999) Total ($9,782,967) ($390,980) ($420,314) ($305,011) ($6,636,266) ($10,934,697) ($391,597) ($28,861,832) Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Revenue Sharing Revenue sharing is projected to commence in FYE 2036.Revenue sharing is projected to commence in FYE 2036. Revenue sharing is part of the 2009 legislative changes to urban renewal and comes into effect when a substantial amendment to increase maximum indebtedness is approved. Revenue sharing means that, at thresholds defined in ORS 457.470, the impacted taxing jurisdictions will receive a share of the incremental growth in the District. The first threshold is 10% of the original maximum indebtedness ($2,200,000). At the 10% threshold, the Agency will receive the full 10% of the initial maximum indebtedness plus 25% of the increment above the 10%threshold and the taxing jurisdictions will receive 75% of the increment above the 10%threshold. Revenue sharing targets are projected to be reached in FYE 2036. If assessed value in the Area grows more quickly than projected, the revenue sharing triggers could be reached earlier. The second threshold is set at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness ($2,750,000). If this threshold is met, revenue for the district would be capped at 12.5% of the maximum indebtedness, with all additional tax revenue being shared with affected taxing districts. This revenue sharing target is projected to be reached in FYE 2047. Projected Revenue Sharing is shown in Table 1. The revenue sharing shown under the "shared- voluntary" column in FYE 2049 is not a result of meeting the revenue sharing triggers, but a result of reaching the maximum indebtedness the final year of the District, estimated in FYE 2049. Projected Revenue Sharing by district is shown in Table 2. Table 1 - Projected Revenue Sharing Gross TIF Shared - Shared - Final Gross FYE Mandatory Voluntary TIF for URA 2036 $188,874 $2,262,958 2037 $319,455 $2,306,485 2038 $455,912 $2,351,971 2039 $598,510 $2,399,503 2040 $747,525 $2,449,175 2041 $903,245 $2,501,082 2042 $1,065,972 $2,555,324 2043 $1,236,023 $2,612,008 2044 $1,413,725 $2,671,242 2045 $1,599,425 $2,733,142 2046 $1,793,480 $2,797,827 2047 $2,111,691 $2,750,000 2048 $2,394,243 $2,750,000 2049 $2,689,509 $2,712,792 $37,208 Total $17,517,592 $2,712,792 $33,177,924 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC Table 2 - Projected Revenue Sharing by Taxing District-General Government Washington Port of Tualatin Valley Tigard Tualatin County SWC Tualatin Metro Portland Fire&Rescue City of Tigard Aquatic Subtotal FYE Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Gen.Govt. 2036 $ 35,215 $ 1,410 $ 1,513 $ 1,098 $ 23,888 $ 39,361 $ 1,410 $ 103,894 2037 $ 59,561 $ 2,384 $ 2,559 $ 1,857 $ 40,403 $ 66,574 $ 2,384 $ 175,723 2038 $ 85,003 $ 3,403 $ 3,652 $ 2,650 $ 57,662 $ 95,011 $ 3,403 $ 250,784 2039 $ 111,590 $ 4,467 $ 4,794 $ 3,479 $ 75,697 $ 124,728 $ 4,467 $ 329,222 2040 $ 139,374 $ 5,579 $ 5,988 $ 4,345 $ 94,544 $ 155,782 $ 5,579 $ 411,191 2041 $ 168,407 $ 6,741 $ 7,235 $ 5,251 $ 114,239 $ 188,233 $ 6,741 $ 496,848 2042 $ 198,747 $ 7,956 $ 8,539 $ 6,196 $ 134,820 $ 222,145 $ 7,956 $ 586,359 2043 $ 230,453 $ 9,225 $ 9,901 $ 7,185 $ 156,327 $ 257,583 $ 9,225 $ 679,899 2044 $ 263,585 $ 10,551 $ 11,325 $ 8,218 $ 178,802 $ 294,616 $ 10,551 $ 777,647 2045 $ 298,208 $ 11,937 $ 12,812 $ 9,297 $ 202,289 $ 333,315 $ 11,937 $ 879,795 2046 $ 334,389 $ 13,385 $ 14,367 $ 10,425 $ 226,832 $ 373,756 $ 13,385 $ 986,539 2047 $ 393,718 $ 15,760 $ 16,916 $ 12,275 $ 267,078 $ 440,070 $ 15,760 $ 1,161,577 2048 $ 446,399 $ 17,869 $ 19,179 $ 13,918 $ 302,814 $ 498,953 $ 17,869 $ 1,317,000 2049 $ 1,007,242 $ 40,318 $ 43,275 $ 31,404 $ 683,262 $ 1,125,823 $ 40,318 $ 2,971,642 Total $ 3,771,892 $ 150,983 $ 162,055 $ 117,599 $ 2,558,659 $ 4,215,949 $ 150,983 $ 11,128,120 Source:Tiberius Solutions LLC City of " r' ' - Respect and Care I Do the Right Thing I Get it Done L ff Tigard _ L. • „- Concurrence with Maximum Indebtedness Increase for the City Center Urban Renewal Plan Tigard City Council Ili Z February 9, 2021 TIGARD Issue: • City Center Substantial Amendment proposes Maximum Indebtedness (yII) increase of $20.8M • ORS 457.220 and ORS 457.470 requires this level of y1I increase be approved by taxing districts that levy 75% permanent rate taxes in the URA • TVF&R board approved on 1 /26 • TTSD and Washington County (revised resolution) are anticipated Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the resolution Tax Impacts to City of Tigard City of Tigard Original Increased MI Cit of Ti:ard MI Cit of Ti:ard FYE Permanent FYE Permanent 2020 ($123,109) 2036 ($65,514) 2021 ($136,523) 2037 ($463,351) 2022 ($151,260) 2038 ($472,486) 2023 ($166,523) 2039 ($482,031) 2024 ($182,319) 2040 ($492,006) 2025 ($198,667) 2026 ($217,971) 2041 ($502,430) 2027 ($238,081) 2042 ($513,323) 2028 ($261,573) 2043 ($524,706) 2029 ($286,160) 2044 ($536,601) 2030 ($311,852) 2045 ($549,032) 2031 ($338,701) 2046 ($562,022) 2032 ($366,758) 2047 ($552,746) 2033 ($396,078) 2048 ($552,603) 2034 ($426,717) 2049 ($15,533) 2035 ($458,734) 2036 ($389,287) Total ($6,284,384) Total ($4,650,313) Full Impact - Original MI and Amendment City of Tigard Full Im 'act Cit of Ti:ard FYE Permanent 2020 ($123,109) 2037 ($463,351) 2021 ($136,523) 2038 ($472,486) 2022 ($151,260) 2039 ($482,031) 2023 ($166,523) 2040 ($492,006) 2024 ($182,319) 2041 ($502,430) 2025 ($198,667) 2042 ($513,323) 2026 ($217,971) 2043 ($524,706) 2027 ($238,081) 2044 ($536,601) 2028 ($261,573) 2045 ($549,032) 2029 ($286,160) 2046 ($562,022) 2030 ($311,852) 2047 ($552,746) 2031 ($338,701) 2048 ($552,603) 2032 ($366,758) 2049 ($15,533) 2033 ($396,078) Total ($10,934,697) 2034 ($426,717) 2035 ($458,734) 2036 ($454,800) City of Tigard Impacts to City of Tigard • The impact to the City of Tigard due to the proposed MI increase = $6,284,384 (reflects $4,215,949 revenue sharing) from FY 2035-36 to FY 2048-49 • This amount is balanced against the future incremental tax. After the district is closed down, tax revenue to the City of Tigard will be greater than would have been otherwise collected in the absence of the urban renewal investments. City of Tigard Questions ? AIS-4507 6. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/09/2021 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Public Hearing: Local Contract Review Board: Consider Revisions to the City's Public Contracting Rules Prepared For: Christine Moody, Finance and Information Services Submitted By: Christine Moody, Finance and Information Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Local Resolution Contract Review Board Public Hearing: Yes Publication Date: Information ISSUE Shall the Local Contract Review Board adopt revisions to the City's Public Contracting Rules? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff Recommends that the Local Contract Review Board (Board) approve the resolution revising the Public Contracting Rules so the City and Tigard City Center Development Agency may streamline the execution of public contracts and comply with Oregon Revised Statutes Chapters 279A, 279B, and 279C. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The City of Tigard has Board-approved rules governing public contracting, including rules covering procedures and exemptions. The current Public Contracting Rules (PCRs) were last revised in June 2020. With this update, the PCRs will incorporate six (6) Class Special Procurements/Exemptions as follows: •Permits, postage meters, pre-stamped postcards, postage accounts and other similar items from the US Postal Service. •Legal services such as legal advice, court reporter, mediator, arbitrator, or other person with similar authority appointed by the court. •Painting, sculpture, mixed media artwork, vocal performance, instrumental performance, dance performance, or other performance art and artwork. •Seminar registrations, training sessions, conference fees controlled by a sole provider for attendance by City staff. • Goods, services or equipment required by grant agreements in which the other party provides the City with financial and other assistance. •Services of a unique nature that require a long-term association, such as legal services, insurance brokerage/agent of record, medical services, financial audit, financial advisor, investment advisor, bond counsel, and banking services. Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 279B.085 allows the Board to exempt certain classes of contracts from competitive bidding if the class of goods or services that are subject of the special procurement/exemption and the circumstances that justify the use of an exemption are: 1. Unlikely to encourage favoritism in the awarding of public contracts or substantially diminish competition; and 2a. Is reasonably expected for result in substantial cost savings to the contracting agency or to the public; or 2b. Otherwise substantially promotes the public interest in a manner that could not practicably realized by complying with requirements in ORS 279B.055 (competitive sealed bidding), ORS 279B.060 (competitive sealed proposals), or ORS 279B.070 (intermediate procurements). As required under ORS 279B.085, findings justifying the six exemptions (Exhibit A) were created and publicly advertised in the Daily Journal of Commerce on January 25, 2021. OTHER ALTERNATIVES The Local Contract Review Board may choose to not approve all or some of the revisions or leave the current PCRs in place. COUNCIL GOALS, POLICIES, APPROVED MASTER PLANS N/A DATES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL CONSIDERATION The Local Contract Review Board approved the current Public Contracting Rules on June 23, 2020. These proposed amendments have not been considered by the board. Attachments Resolution Exhibit A Special Procurement/Exemption Findings Exhibit B PCR Amendment CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 21- A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF TIGARD PUBLIC CONTRACTING RULES WHEREAS; the City of Tigard's Public Contracting Rules, adopted pursuant to Tigard Municipal Code 2.46,provide for the processes and procedures of public contracting in the City; and WHEREAS, Oregon Revised Statute 279B.085 allows the Local Contract Review Board (Board) to exempt certain classes of contracts from competitive bidding if conditions have been met; and WHEREAS, the Board wishes to exempt the following general classes of contracts from competitive bidding, as further described in the attached findings: USPS services, legal services, performance art and artwork, conference registration, contracts associated with grant agreements, and contracts for which a long-term relationship is necessary; and WHEREAS, pursuant to state statute, the City has adopted findings justifying the exemptions and published the findings in the Daily Journal of Commerce on January 25, 2021. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard Local Contract Review Board that: SECTION 1: The City's Public Contracting Rules are amended as shown in the attached Exhibit B. SECTION 2: The exemptions are supported by the findings attached as Exhibit A. SECTION 3: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2021. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO.21- Page 1 EXHIBIT A City of Tigard — Public Contracting Rules New Class Special Procurement/Exemption Findings 10.022—US POSTAL SERVICE 1. The City may directly purchase without a competitive solicitation process, permits and postage meters, pre-stamped postcards, establish on-going postage accounts, and other similar items from the US Postal Service. 2. By their very nature, postal service products and materials are protected for the use by the US Postal Service. Most products are established and regulated under federal law. 3. This Class Special Procurement/Exemption will not encourage favoritism or substantially diminish competition in the awarding of City contracts, as required by ORS 279B. With the owner of the products and materials being a branch of the US government, there is no true competition and the competitive bidding process will not lower the price of the products and materials as the production and distribution of such materials is controlled by the US Postal Service and may only be used through that source. 4. Since the City has no control over the type of products and materials used and they can only be used with the US Postal Service, the acquisition of such contracts cannot practicably be realized by using other purchasing methods. 10.062—LEGAL SERVICES 1. The City may directly purchase,without a competitive solicitation process, services related to the provision of legal advice to the City and other legal services. Legal services are determined largely based on qualifications of a particular firm or attorney for the matter at issue, often with an urgent need that does not allow for a lengthy solicitation process. Due to rules limiting a firm's ability to represent a potential client that could be adverse to another client, the number of firms that represent local governments are sometimes limited. This means that for some specialty practices, there may be only a few attorneys in the state with the expertise in the subject and interest in representing the City. Additionally, an ongoing relationship with a firm or attorney may be advantageous to the City by reducing the time the attorney spends getting acquainted with the facts or project, thereby ultimately reducing the cost to the City in the long- term. 2. Services such as those provided by a court reporter, or copy service are often selected by another person. In order to receive the benefit of the contractor's work, such as deposition transcripts or photocopies, the City has no choice but to purchase from that same vendor. A similar situation arises when a mediator, referee or court appointed individual is selected either by a court or by joint agreement between the City and another party in an effort to resolve a claim or dispute asserted by or against the City, regardless of whether litigation has been filed. In such a situation the City has either no choice in the selection of the person when it is mandated by the 1 court, an arbitrator, or other person with similar authority. Similarly, there are situations where the City and another party must mutually agree to hire a specific individual, such as a mediator in order to resolve an ongoing legal issue. In the absence of mutual agreement, the proposed mediation, arbitration or other proceeding will likely not occur. As a result, the City will be unable to use such informal methods to resolve a dispute and will be required to use more formal, and more expensive,legal proceedings. 3. This Class Special Procurement/Exemption will not encourage favoritism and competition will not be substantially diminished. The selection of a person by the court or person with similar authority means the City had no say in the selection process. The selection of a person by mutual agreement also means the City does not have unfettered control of the selection process. Similarly, the City will enjoy substantial cost savings by proceeding in this fashion because it permits the City to resolve disputes informally without resort to a more expensive and more formal legal process. For selection of legal services, due to the small pool of qualified attorneys willing to represent a local government, competition will not be diminished because the process is already determined by experience, qualifications, and potential for conflicts, making it not conductive to a competitive process. 10.064—PERFORMANCE ART AND ARTWORK 1. The City may enter into a direct contract with an artist(s) for a painting, sculpture, mixed media artwork, vocal performance, instrumental performance, dance performance without competitive solicitation. 2. This Class Special Procurement/Exemption will not substantially diminish competition because art is of a creative nature and therefore uniquely offered from a sole provider. The City requires specific types of artwork for its parks and public buildings that identify with the surrounding community. The library, parks and community service programs require performance art as part of the program curriculum. 3. By their nature artists and performers have a unique style that fit within a specific category. The requirements of ORS 279B are not feasible in meeting what the City desires for a specific circumstance in promoting community services or the public interest. 10.066—SEMINAR,TRAINING REGISTRATION AND CONFERENCE FEES 1. The City is able to directly purchase seminar registrations, training sessions and conference fees from a single source for attendance by City staff. 2. Such seminars, training and conferences are often unique in their content, are proprietary by nature, and organized,produced, or controlled by a sole provider. 3. Due to the limited competition and unique nature of these seminars, training and conference fees, it is unlikely that this Class Special Procurement/Exemption will encourage favoritism or substantially diminish competition in the awarding of City contracts, as required by ORS 279B. Because competition is limited or nonexistent for seminar, training registrations and conference fees, the City will incur substantial cost savings by directly contracting with the organization 2 rather than incurring the cost of advertising for bids or proposals when the price would be the same as if the City directly contracted. 10.068—GOODS, SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT REQUIRED BY GRANT AGREEMENTS 1. The City frequently enters into grant agreements in which the other party provides the City with financial and other assistance. 2. As a condition of receiving a grant, the City may be contractually bound to purchase specific goods and services, including, but not limited to, goods identified by brand name. If the City does not comply with grant terms and conditions, including the purchase of specific goods and services, the City may lose the funding or assistance provided by the grant. 3. Purchasing specific items required by a grant will not encourage favoritism or substantially diminish competition in the awarding of City contracts, as required by ORS 279B because the City is not the entity that determines what items to procure. In addition, this will result in substantial cost savings to the City because the City will not incur the cost of advertising and competitive bidding in a situation where the City has no real option as to what to purchase. 70.012—SELECTION BY NEGOTIATION 1. Occasionally the City needs to maintain its long-term association with a particular contractor, when the work is not project driven but requires a relationship of knowledge and trust. Examples of such work include legal services, insurance brokerage/agent of record services, medical services, financial audit and other audit services, services of a financial advisor, services of an investment advisor,bond counsel services, and banking services. 2. This Class Special Procurement/Exemption will not encourage favoritism or substantially diminish competition in the awarding of City contracts, as required by ORS 279B. From time to time the City will issue a formal solicitation based upon a particular industry best practice. For example, best practice deems that financial auditor should not perform audit services to a particular entity beyond 10 years. Staff with specific expertise can dictate when a new solicitation is issued based upon their knowledge of the industry best practice. 3. This Class Special Procurement/Exemption substantially promotes the public interest by continuing a relationship of a unique nature in that the contractor has certain knowledge and expertise of the City that incorporating a new contractor at an inopportune time would cause risk and hardship to city operations. Examples,include but are not limited to the following: Audit Services - • The first year of audit services with a new contractor takes a greater amount of work as the audit firm learns the City's systems and processes, • Additional staff time is needed for education of policies and internal controls with considerable time spent on background and orientation, documentation and reporting requirements. 3 • Added resources are needed in the first year in order pull data for the audit request list, thereafter this largely becomes a maintenance. Banking Services— • Integration with existing systems takes considerable time and resources, depending on how many systems need to be integrated. • Setting up City payroll requires a concerted effort and additional resources for ACH and Direct Deposit. • Utility Billing, Police, Library and Public Works merchant transaction transition period could be impactful and requires forethought and significant planning with multiple departments/stakeholders. Financial Advisor— • Bringing on a new financial advisor in the middle of a long-term project is not advantageous as there is significant time and resources required to bring a new contractor up speed causing a time delay in the project schedule. Legal Services - • It is most advantageous for the City to keep the same bond counsel throughout the life of a project as frequent advising is needed of the terms and conditions of the official statement or master declaration associated with a bond issuance. • Matters involving litigation may last for several years, which may not have been anticipated when the attorney was first selected. It is not practical to change attorneys partway through a litigated case, so the ongoing relationship would be essential to the continuity of the case. • Past competitive selection processes for the City's municipal prosecutor have only resulted in one prospective contractor. Given the importance of maintaining continuity in that position as an important part of the City's municipal court function, and the lack of alternative proposers, it is in the public interest to not require a competitive process for this position. 4 EXHIBIT B CITY OF TIGARD — LOCAL CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD PUBLIC CONTRACTING RULES February 2021 PCR 5.000—MISCELLANEOUS *****NO CHANGE***** PCR 10.000— COMPETITIVE PROCESS REQUIRED, EXEMPTIONS 10.022 US POSTAL SERVICE The City may directly purchase without a competitive solicitation process,permits and postage meters,pre-stamped postcards, establish on-going postage accounts, etc. from the US Postal Service. 10.062 LEGAL SERVICES The City may directly purchase without competitive solicitation, services related providing legal advice to the City and other services integral to the provision of legal services. All requests for contracted legal services need to be approved by the City Attorney before any agreement is made. 10.064 PERFORMANCE ART AND ARTWORK The City may enter into a contract for performance art or artwork when the City is purchasing a creative product, such as,but not limited to: a painting, sculpture, mixed media artwork,vocal performance,instrumental performance, or dance performance. 10.066 SEMINAR,TRAINING REGISTRATION AND CONFERENCE FEES The City may directly purchase seminar registrations and training sessions fees for attendance of City employees or officials at seminars, conferences and training courses hosted by outside entities. 10.068 GOODS, SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT REQUIRED BY GRANT AGREEMENTS The City may directly purchase,without a competitive solicitation process,goods, services or equipment when they are required to be purchased from a specific source or when a specific brand name is required, and no competition is otherwise available. PCR 15.000 - PRICE AGREEMENTS *****NO CHANGE***** PCR 20.000 - BRAND NAMES OR MARKS *****NO CHANGE***** 1 PCR 25.000—MINORITY OWNED,WOMAN OWNED. EMERGING SMALL BUSINESSES AND SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN OWNED BUSINESSES *****NO CHANGE***** PCR 30.000 - FORMAL COMPETITIVE PROCESSES *****NO CHANGE***** PCR 40.035 - CONTRACT CANCELLATION PROCEDURES *****NO CHANGE***** PCR 50.000—WAIVER OF SECURITY (BID, PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS) (Also see PCR 30.055) *****NO CHANGE***** PCR 60.000 - PROPERTY DISPOSITION *****NO CHANGE***** PCR 70.000 - PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS 70.012 SELECTION BY NEGOTIATION The City may procure professional services through direct negotiation when the nature of the work is not project-driven but requires an ongoing,long-term relationship of knowledge and trust. Examples of such work include legal services,insurance brokerage/agent of record services, medical services, financial audit and other audit services, services of a financial advisor, services of an investment advisor, bond counsel services, and banking services. PCR 80.000 - EMERGENCY CONTRACTS: SPECIFIC EXEMPTION REQUIREMENTS: BOARD EXCEPTION: PROCEDURES:TEMPORARY EXEMPTIONS *****NO CHANGE***** 2 PCR 90.000-RECYCLABLE. RECYCLED,AND SUSTAINABLE PURCHASING GUIDELINES *****NO CHANGE***** 3 AIS-4572 7. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/09/2021 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION WAIVING BUSINESS LICENSE LATE FEES Prepared For: Toby LaFrance Submitted By: Carol Krager, Central Services Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Resolution Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall council approve a resolution to waive business license renewal late fees for 2021? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends approval of the resolution as presented. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY Tigard City Council has directed staff to look at various ways of providing financial assistance to its residences and businesses through the COVID-19 pandemic. One such option is to waive late fees associated with the city's business license program. All businesses in the city are required to register their businesses through the Tigard Business License process within the Finance Department. Requirements for business owners are set forth in Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) 5.04 and the majority of the revenue generated by the program supports the Commercial Crimes Unit of the Tigard Police Department. All businesses are required to have a valid business license and this resolution does not change that requirement. However, the city also recognizes the far-reaching economic impacts of COVID-19 on the community and that some businesses may be having difficulty making payments now. When the COVID-19 pandemic began last year, late fees were already assessed and mostly paid by the time the City Council started waiving fees last spring in response to COVID. Business license fees are due annually by the end of the calendar year. Businesses are charged a 10% late fee after the first of the year. This proposal waives the addition of a 10% late fee through December 31, 2021. Businesses are still required to pay their business license fees. Tigard has approximately 3,000 businesses with licenses currently. In a typical year, about 500 businesses are late with payment and receive a late notice. Typically, the late fee notice results in most businesses paying and only around 100 that require additional outreach. Currently, there are about 900 business that have not paid and are due to have a late fee assessed. The majority of businesses that have not paid their business license fee to date are smaller businesses of 1-5 employees. If council approves the waiver of late fees, a reminder notice will be mailed out; however, no late fee will be assessed. An insert will be included in the reminder notice informing the businesses of council's action to waive their late fee. The potential revenue loss for the city is approximately $16,000. This is a two percent reduction to our budgeted $744,000 in business license revenue. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could choose to not approve this resolution or make additional amendments. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS City Council has previously waived fees for city businesses and residents to provide COVID-19 financial relief. DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION N/A Attachments Resolution CITY OF TIGARD, OREGON TIGARD CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21- A RESOLUTION WAIVING LATE FEES FOR CITY OF TIGARD BUSINESS LICENSES THROUGH DECEMBER 31,2021 WHEREAS,Tigard Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 5.04 regulates business licenses in the City of Tigard;and WHEREAS, all persons directly or indirectly engaging in business in the City of Tigard are required to have a valid business license;and WHEREAS, the financial impacts of the COVID-19 emergency are being broadly felt across the Tigard community;and WHEREAS, the Tigard City Council seeks to identify ways in which it can provide financial assistance to those impacted by the pandemic,including by the deferral or waiver of certain fees;and WHEREAS,by waiving late fees accruing on or January 1,2021 for a new or renewal business license,the City hopes to provide some relief to its businesses while still maintaining the City's business license program. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Tigard City Council that: SECTION 1: The City waives all late fees associated with an initial or renewal business license accruing as of January 1, 2021 and continuing until December 31, 2021. Notwithstanding, all businesses are required to pay the application or renewal fee and possess a valid business license, pursuant to TMC 5.04. SECTION 2: This resolution is effective immediately upon passage. PASSED: This day of 2021. Mayor-City of Tigard ATTEST: City Recorder-City of Tigard RESOLUTION NO.21- Page 1 AIS-4522 8. Business Meeting Meeting Date: 02/09/2021 Length (in minutes): 10 Minutes Agenda Title: Consider purchase of property at 8686 SW Oak St. and Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to complete the transaction. Submitted By: Andrew Newbury, Public Works Item Type: Motion Requested Meeting Type: Council Business Meeting - Main Public Hearing No Newspaper Legal Ad Required?: Public Hearing Publication Date in Newspaper: Information ISSUE Shall Council authorize the purchase of the property at 8686 SW Oak Street for $280,000 and authorize City Manager and City Attorney to take all necessary steps to complete the transaction? STAFF RECOMMENDATION / ACTION REQUEST Staff recommends Council authorize purchase of property. The acquisition of this property is recommended in the adopted 2018 Stormwater Master Plan and the current property owner is willing to sell to the City now. KEY FACTS AND INFORMATION SUMMARY The acquisition of this property is the first step of a larger project that will enlarge and restore an existing floodplain. A private home is currently located on this property and is extremely close to Ash Creek. Ash Creek is eroding the existing bank adjacent to the home and this area routinely floods. Acquiring this property will result in a future project in which the home will be demolished, and the adjacent floodplain will be enlarged and restored. This floodplain work will ultimately result in less flooding, reduce stream erosion, protect downstream private property and wetlands, and improve water quality. The current property owner has approached the City stating they are willing to sell the property for $280,000. This amount is the appraised value stated in an appraisal report completed in August 2020 on the City's behalf. OTHER ALTERNATIVES Council could not approve the purchase of the property or could propose different terms. COUNCIL OR TCDA GOALS, POLICIES, MASTER PLANS Acquistion of property is noted as a high priority in the adopted 2018 Stormwater Master Plan (Project ID: CIP 106). DATES OF PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION None Fiscal Impact Cost: $280,000 Budgeted (yes or no): yes Where Budgeted (department/program): Stormwater Fund Additional Fiscal Notes: Funding for project is included in the Q2 supplemental which was approved by council on January 26. Funds are available in the Stormwater Fund. The $280,000 is for the purchase of the property only. Demolition of the home and future floodplain work will be done under separate contracts. Attachments No file(s) attached.