Loading...
TRE2021-00002 City of Tigard, Oregon • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, OR 97223 TIGARD 01/06/2021 Chris Hall 29918 NE Livingston Mt. Circle Camas, WA 98607 Re: Tree Removal Permit Record Number: TRE2021-00002 Dear Chris Hall: On 01/06/2021 you submitted an application for tree removal at 12555 SW HALL BLVD. Your application specified that: 2 Ponderosa Pine 1 Oregon White Oak is/are proposed for removal. Based on the information supplied on your application, this is a simple tree removal permit request. City staff has reviewed your application and based on the relevant approval criteria in the Urban Forestry Manual, your application has been: Development Tree Replacement Required Approved with conditions: The applicant shall plant a replacement tree for each tree removed, or pay a fee in lieu of planting, in accordance with the Development Tree Replacement Standards in Section 7, part 2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Existing trees may be considered as replacement trees if they meet all applicable species, size, condition and location requirements in Section 7, part 2 and were not already required to be planted or preserved by the Tigard Municipal Code. This decision is final and valid for a period of up to one year after issuance unless otherwise specified. Nothing prevents you from submitting another tree permit application if the conditions and circumstances surrounding this removal have changed. If you have any questions, please contact us at arborist@tigard-or.gov or 503-718-2421. Please be sure to reference record number - TRE2021-00002. Best regards, ArA G % Community Planning Division City of Tigard ` City of Tigard !COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Er Tree Removal Permit Application Solicitud de Permieo para RemoverArboles RECEIVED PROPERTY ADDRESS I DIRECCION DE LA PROPIEDAD BAN 05 2021 BEMA Address (Direction): Ir,5.55 5:ti_ R a1{ 'tiv)r � E� PLANM�'�I�(�ERING REQUISTTOS PARA APLICAR APPLICANT I SOLICITANTE y� M Owners Signature/Written Name (l\lombre): 3j rth i-a(( Authorization Address (Direction) l ki ME 1,:iJ,+ j�a 1-4" t`+si:le {tr k ' Firma del dueno/AutoriZaeiorrpor n JJ escrita Phone (Tel): COI - aa qL 3 - 0 i Email: C�at1 e, 0,„ a,teMrtef_e,v^- ii ll iX Site Plan (show location& Owner(Duero): 1 1Vexvt ❑ Same as applicant species of each tree,2 copies) (Igual al solicitante) Croguis(Indicar ubicacidny especie de CONTRACTOR/ARBORIST INFORMATION coda Arol,2 coptar) INFORMACION DEL CONTRATISTA/ARBOLISTA ® Documentation (from removal Company(Campania): \tJe i- 1N - pc ReA4AeJetC'2Z -'rsAi.e. criteria) Documentation(del criteria de Contact person (Contacto): e%5 l ki remotion) took- aISA/CCB#:PlJ-&Cato.� -22,C.K� Expiration�irion iatii)94 —11l vfas ❑ Application Fee(complex only) /; 41Ck; Pago(solo para el proceso complelo') Address (Direction): e gctt� OE 1,.•t S 4ow µ.i,�- e:fL1.P_ ea, li,J.c Phone (Tel): q 1 I - a 9 3 - 9yd l Email: el.all @ s,:,k7 t oet54-e r,Lo....... TREE INFORMATION—to be completed by applicant INFORMACION DEL ARBOL — el solicitante debe completar esta parte `.,G / ( FOR STAFF USE ONLY Tree species (Especie delarbol):?op-oedoSQ. NWJ ctarc-.Iatia, `+`^r a Solo para use del personal #of trees (#de tirboles): 3 l \\ ( / I . REVIEW PROCESS Tree location(Ubicacion del arbol): e�et6-F6toe, aT 10vailt (wt.:,m (0+ Simple ❑ Complex 1 Fee(complex only): Reason(s)for Tree Removal 1 Razones para cortar el irbol -C72 Case No.: I. SIMPLE REVIEW PROCESS I PROCESO DE REVISION SLMPLE Related Case No(s): tg Tree is a hazard as determined 0 Tree is dead(Arbol ester muerto) Application accepted: by an Arborist(El arbol es un Al--- , peligro regal:to determinado par an ❑ Removal required for approved land use or By: c\� Date: arbolirta) building permit(Necesario para la aprobaeion de on permiso de use de Jude a construction) Application determined complete: 0 Tree is in an advanced state of - t'� Date: decline (Arbol ester en estado de ® Roots are causing damage B y: deterioro avanZaao) (Las rakes wartAmanda dada) Translated: 0 Thinning necessary to protect other trees ❑ Conflicts with TSP Project (Es necesario ralearpara proteger orros drboles) By: Date: (Conflicto con ten preyed°de iranrportacion TSP) ❑ Location does not meet planting standards IACornansnity Dcvclopmcnt\Land Use Applications\OtFo,ms (Ubicaeiorr no cumpk con normas de plantation) and Templates\Land Usc Applications Rev.09/201t 0 Species is on nuisance tree list (La especie kid en la lista de drboles 0 Recommended by fire marshal problemdticos) (Fue recomendado par el marina!de inondios) ❑ It is infested with pests or disease ❑ Tree has sustained physical damage (Ester infestado con plagac o (Arbol ester fuitamente darlado) enfermedades) City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 3 of 4 • TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION II. COMPLEX REVIEW PROCESS (check applicable reason and provide brief proposal summary) PROCESO DE REVISION COMPLEJO(Marque el nrativa apliea1;0 di um explieaeidn breve) ❑ Blocking views or solar access ❑ Undesirable species 0 Other (explain below) (Bloqueo de vista o acceso solar) (Especie no deseada) Otro (explique debajo) Please leave blank for staff I Dejar en blanco pars el personal THE APPLICANT SHALL CERTIFY THAT: EL SOLICITANTE CERTIFICA QUE: • The above request does not violate any deed restrictions • La solicited anterior no viola ninguna restriction de las that may be attached to or imposed upon the subject escritrrras de la propiedad que pueda ser conectada a o impuesta property. sobre la pmpiedad en cuestion, • If the application is granted,the applicant will exercise the • Si la solicited es concedida, el solicitante jercereI los derechos rights granted in accordance with the terms and subject to concedidos de acuerdo con los terminosy si eto a las condicionesy all the conditions and limitations of the approval. limitations de la apmbacion. • All of the above statements and the statements in the plot - Todas las declarations anteriores_y has declarations en el plan,attachments,and exhibits transmitted herewith,are croqu%y las documentos adjuntos,y muestras trasmitidas, son true;and the applicants so acknowledge that any permit verdaderas;y los solicitantes asi reconocen que cualquierperms'so issued,based on this application,and may be revoked if it is concedido, basado en esta solicited,puede ser revocado si se found that any such statements are false. encuentra que alguna de estas afirmaciones es falca. • The applicant has read the entire contents of the • El solicilante ha leido todo el contenido de la aplicacion, application,including the policies and criteria,and incluyendo las politicasy critedosy camrprende los requisitospara understands the requirements for approving or denying theap mbar o negar la solicited application. SIGNATURES of each owner of the subject property required. FIRMAS de calla duefio e piedad en cuestion requeridas./ G'/ G e4tr4fl e 1- lia-(( v 1 09 foa l Applicants signature (Firma del solicitante) Print name (Nombre) Dat (F ha) Owner's signature (Firma del dueno) Print name (Nombre) Date (Fecha) fr�kf: 0-0 etkkl vt e er smature (Firma.el dueno) Print name (Nombre) Date (Fecha) uthonzed agent's signature Print name (Nombre) Date (Fec a) (Firma de agente autoriado) City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 4 of 4 1 A fro rtk-1 1itie5 foes fay )ae \ 1 NockL I \\:\. :_____:,.,.., U 06,\4, pllose -cs,,f 13tAIQIIikne ipo(lt r d4- t-oo+s ia555 t. X Gt,vP w.aet e5 C} ne P . corie r �Q O)&t /i Q- � ?6,0c, I ! ' X pL f71 )n 0et0Se- ,^e� c. fZa+• Tie c i ?fo rced -�or f -Q.0-0 40 1 g ?if....04.11 ( O.1 ` � — ` DtkCl Fay ', r c O QA-5 cro 4 Rx"rhT�E9 caAA-S\ (�01 4ie I L______y : A�foxr Pto tOf k-r 1fwC.S City ofTigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • n-wzti tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of 4 f ISA �/ Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client I-.Q,w. �{Qvl Date DI IOt't (8,?a t Time 3;OO +Qw4.. f)5.3 Address/Tree location 1 r}5 5 5 S. 4) • I I s 1( bt.0 T i3at'e 1 OYL Tree no. 1 Sheet ) of Tree species t)r,.i c'tr3S .. 9X 1J1,3`5 dbh C1Lt•5., Height t t()' Crown spread dia. 5O t Assessor(s) tt CA-E g '--ttA Time frame ',,a,a,e-1 Tools used b;*at.,.1&;5 i CRe-te.rw Target Assessment Target zone Occupancy �• N c I. c rate C g c m I E 5 C m ', " 1-rare a '6 o r= F ? Target description .a g c 3 x 2-occasional 1,v u u isF- . g, ' 3-frequent .. C ; A' '; F 4-constant as £ C ,o 1 Paltr.t,..e Lc it %�\7/�C /� 3 No NO 2 Q..S,Aess f 8wa a't, 3 Nt� a 3 \ItIP ,Ltes 3 �n 00 4 bu.,.Sr-e6C CcA5-6 c r 5 3 No Iso Site Factors History of failures 'o,ta.�,ctn.,. i SL L 4'oIf?5 1 ',..E t'orl,,e.$ Topography Flats Slope❑ % Aspect Flr. Site changes None® Grade change❑ Site clearing Changed soil hydrology Root cuts❑ Describe Soil conditions Limited volume❑ Saturated❑ Shallow$3 Compacted W Pavement over roots Eil 45 % Describe it-er,e. -4vcc5 ace- ... ?4,11t1.14 Prevailing wind direction E Common weather Strong winds El Ice❑ Snow 0 Heavy rain Eil Describe 4- ii,`;L Al QNLJ n. +-itc r Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low 0 Normal ®. High 0 Foliage None(seasonal)0 None(dead)0 Normal q % Chlorgtic C' % Necrotic f C? % Pests 61r-cL p '' 5 , ttti 5/:"'ttr i Abiotic S(9.sefe 1-6,01 ekw•ale krowt (ttoNpru-i',r. Species failure profile Bkanches® Trunk❑ Roots® Describe t" -1-rt 1', 4-a- _).c e) t o..2 Se; o oo,1e -tv a,t, -t4,:o,..) Load Factors Wind exposure Protected❑ Partial Fully Wind funneling® Rr':lace,* -rr, Ill.ctwio- Relative crown size Small Medium❑ Large El Crown density Sparse 0 Normal El Dense 0 Interior branches Few 0 Normal El Dense 0 Vines/Mistletoe/Moss 0 Recent or planned change in load factors ?A Oz.: (Air -ko be t^r,,,..o o '£c Ce�i .ce a 5P op c e s-oeek r?,,,,,...64 a y;,+.t Or,c s: Tree Defe�and Conditions Affecting the Likelihoodbf Failure J i —Crown and Branches— Unbalanced crown 0 LCR el f % Cracks 0 Lightning damage❑ Dead twigs/branches Ei b %overall Max.dia. t ( l Codominant 0 Included bark 0 Broken/Hangers Number 3 Max.dia. ).'' Weak attachments El ( las Cavity/Nest A al e S Ac o, hole %circ. Over extended branches El Previous branch failures M .(ra-4a I 65 Similar branches present fill Pruning history Crown cleaned 0 Thinned 0 Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay 0 Reduced 0 Topped 0 Lion-tailed 0 Conks 0 Heartwood decay 0 Flush cuts 0 Other ) )o N c. Response growth $`tot """ I Main concern(s) I,ta,^-e C,-- -LI I«c C Load on defect N/A® Minor 0 Moderate❑ Significant 0 Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible fir Probable ❑ Imminent 0 —Trunk— —Roots and Root Collar— Dead/Missing bark 0 Abnormal bark texture/color 0 Collar buried/Not visible 0 Depth Stem girdling 0 Codominant stems 0 Included bark 0 Cracks 0 Dead 14 Decay El Conks/Mushrooms 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze El Ooze 0 Cavity 0 %circ. Lightning dama e❑ Heartwood deco ❑ Conks/Mushrooms 0 ' g g g y Cracks 0 Cut/Damaged roots� Distance from trunk a�1'1 Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poor taper 0 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness 0 Lean ° Corrected? Response growth Response growth e 0 p S Mainconcern(s) V,ra,t- --' -rJ!,tire - �l{r,-0-t� Mainconcern(s) xd�^ '(� �t'\��� I 'S C(CS�+tnE-I4 !late o: `1et,.t ,. (CS vikocc2 A(�ua,tc£f r�A,koje \,,3‘114 '(li.Ctt Load on defect N/A❑ Minor 0 Moderate❑ Significant 0 Load on defect N/A® Minor 0 Moderate El Significant 0 Likelihood of failure Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible 0 Probable 0 Imminent 0 Improbable 0 Possible 0 Probable Imminent 0 . Risk Categorization Likelihood t c., iv' Failure&Impact Consequences Failure Impact c u £ (from Matrix 1) c C 3 v Risk o N :° c a a, 5 2 ? m c rating Conditions v a Target ° $ c— '— x aa) > m `o ;c 2 of part o .a ro `m g a o a E a 3 v Loo E Y 2' v Cc i (from v Tree part of concern a Il ( protection E n Cr. . > .3 _ N J > Z C VI .n Matrix2) 10ra.a4e5 00erS'tZea y'l -is 3 ool,) 00000 •00• • Nlou 1 Sc,a i66 yw5`i+ - -4 9e is 0000 0000 0000 0000 a pope wA&5 0000 0000 0000 0000 O�sUw�Y T n n NoNL 00.00000 0000 000. t�1* 2 (oo4 au -1Op tkU T7 0000000000000000 3 .f5ke�` To_v NkzP*Os 0000000000000000 00000000 0000 0000 3 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Matrix 1.Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Ukelihood of Impacting Target of Failure Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2.Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Failure&Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High • High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes,explanations,descriptions 1 b-kStote o so- Ov..c rn-&S C ti5e Seoere I..er&Ait a•Ic - L Sus-rei Atli•-c k 04 (�k Las C Ce tAt. octtl.1 � I �4 u e �e r�a„m-aA� 1 1N be. Mitigation options Itgt,.A.pve p vev(t.4 2 -'l e- 4tee S W► 1 Residual risk ti5 _e,..J 4cte S -tL ,.{ Y v.),V&. ILO+ cn t.e-52 �A,» (JQ 4c) Residual risk (,i � ` f J PKC1Lt lr4 ( r- e, p VL,".-Zi - I f'O *-c l loetta�9 . aqn� Residual risk e -rd.n� Loa.-F-..A,'j- COw•Da-I.a-, , 1--f '1'RE t-Ire -to o-s '-- -Residual risk 4\81.,. 3 Overall tree risk rating Low 0 Moderate IR1 High❑ Extreme❑ Work priority 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 351 4❑ Overall residual risk Low❑ Moderate❑ High 0 Extreme® Recommended inspection interval 1 . „0..Z ort1V Data RIFinal ID Preliminary Advanced assessment needed®No❑Yes-Type/Reason I Inspection limitations ❑None ®Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe (; oo l-s tl.utDe( acid,(4- This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture(ISA)and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified(TRAQ)arborists-2013 Page 2 of 2 ISA. Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client Y..Cvt tAtav Date o (or1 f aoat Time \'.QO e.•^- p54- Address/Tree location I a555 5..,3 • k4P-1.-L [eLV1D -iCa,r),6YL Tree no._ a- Sheet 1 of a Tree species (pnA�Ps65a PS 1JU.S dbh H8.5° Height 1 lO' Crown spread dia. (� ' Assessor(s) 1 C,l,..c-' 5 ll Time frame t- 3ye-- Tools used tw\ is t GCIM.laer Target Assessment Target zone Occupancy • `m v = .E . rate « m c , e ; c y 3S 1-rare um Dm t- Target description — E - a x 2-occasional u" " " 1. n �•se"t 3-frequent m ;F 3 4-constant aE .1., nF 0.1 r,v..sko ti.r 5 3 4J0 P 6 2 VA.CV` tq Io - 3 pc PO 3 Z uj:1 1 ; 1.)0 4DO 4 vel.-1t_V5 3 0o Na Site Factors History of failures la.1-3e 4>Cck.•+41...t c Topography Flat® Slope❑ % AspectAc i- Site changes None® Grade change❑ Site clearing 0 Changed soil hydrology 0 Root cuts 0 Describe Soil conditions Limited volume Saturated❑ Shallow® Compacted® Pavement over roots® 15 % Describetis al,:.< l o - 4tee Prevailing wind direction E- Common weather Strong winds0 Ice Snow❑ Heavy rain0 Describe ytrtyt..,lc.r lLe- 4 5 •-' Tree Health and Species Profile J Vigor Low❑ Normal IS High 0 Foliage None(seasonal)❑ None(dead)0 Normal 90 % Chlorotic % Necrotic (7 % Pests Ioi9.t.A/- 4Q't..e'1 AL,-/ Si_te.tcll5t lto,llc .4•le5 Abiotic Severe C'o64- �e...+..nrir Xh,. rnw�1G�hlo� Species failure profile Branches 0 Trunk pi Roots 0 Describe Load Factors Wind exposure Protected Partial 0 Full® Wind funneling El Nkos4-1 / tle.,te' attc Relative crown size Small❑ Medium!: Large'® Crown density Sparse Normal® Dense❑ Interior branches Few Normal® Dense 0 Vines/Mistletoe/Moss 0 Recent or planned change in load factors 1 1.(,_ -co\rro u04 LA43Po,r k,A lat- +w.u.S-4' c eF ta-ce a+� 5eocte leak- e,t„,',: oc Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure p —Crown and Branches— Unbalanced crown RILCR 90 % Cracks VI 4 c t-S t a.. C.r 4.c.t �v. a t" .3r rAftc5 Lightning damage❑ Dead twigs/branches 0 In %overall Max.dia. s Codominant® V-tdu. 44114164 ot5•tp,ei Grax.IL, Included bark 1 Broken/Hangers Number Max.dia. 2-.4) Weak attachments® 1p0-4L,. A-hArtls abme 1>1;}Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Over-extended branches 0 Previous branch failures 0 SCa.--c4-o 1 a5 Similar branches present 0 Pruning history Crown cleaned 0 Thinned 0 Raised 0 Dead/Missing bark 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Reduced 0 Topped ❑ Lion-tailed 0 Conks 0 Heartwood decay 0 Flush cuts 0 Other 13 013 5 Response growth 1--'0 -'� ainconcern(s) Seoete Ga-k caSA ra41C,t —cap\1•A.C' v 4- 1- 2 V�.A`,,. -a t.,_w.� w Al,,_ - -14.,_t2� -kacoe.l'5 t� CIo<e pr.oxl4-;+ly w•�le -1-tee -l�,:,1..re. rl,�-4er dry-1cwa/ lS se le. c' eb Load oJn defect N/A❑ t Minor 0 Moderate❑ Significant® btk - v•a;...#r tkik4 nlnoue 5it1',l- ate.Jeofrn ..17 Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible U Probable ® Imminent 0 —Trunk— —Roots and Root Collar— Dead/Missing bark 0 Abnormal bark texture/color 0 Collar buried/Not visible 0 Depth Stem girdling 0 Codominant stems 0 Included bark 0 Cracks 0 Dead ® Decay El Conks/Mushrooms 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze 'a Ooze 0 Cavity 0 %circ. Lightning damage❑ Heartwood decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms 0 Cracks 0 Cut/Damaged roots® Distance from trunk a-Li Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poor taper 0 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness 0 Lean " Corrected? Response growth Response growth Main concern(s) µae ,A --rurllt5 -Vt►;1•tv j aa- SD F I-1 Main concern(s) W44e.t )frwewa.I ;S seekc'rE a a I 1 (to vn1,e. 59-Jere cC&r ,livd.Artfn tall: be i+,_et.rrea Load on defect N/A❑ Minor 0 Moderate 0 Significant IS Load on defect N/A❑ Minor 0 Mo erate tgl Significant 0 Likelihood of failure Likelihood of failure Improbable Possible 0 Probable 0 Imminent 0 Improbable 0 Possible 0 Probable 121 Imminent 0 Risk Categorization Likelihood IT, d a Failure Impact Failure&Impact Consequences E d (from Matrix 1) c Risk n a 10 c a > rating o = = « m o d v 3 E a t 1 a m art 'v Conditions t O p Target I? s . c c ' Y d > Y °a 22 7g :! of (f m 8 ego g n N o E i' 3 a m E y v i (from u Tree part of concern a LL 12 protection E a it E >" o ii 11 D . > z a Matrix2) brwwLtS L1JA- e� y,, �c 3 I,at�f 0000 0000 0.00 0 to° 1 5Givi.40M .5� -+--,00 0000 0000 0000 OOOO p u.11 0000 0000 0000 0000 tf1 t�-�rOL' 5Q ',�� S'' 0 �, t�ot,z ooe0000lo 00ot0 000z N'9�'3 0000 0000 0000 00.0 2 z�SM kr,a� � 00000000 0000 0000 3 �6 oal�vc 3�',` C5t 3 ekoo.e 00.0000 oo®0000. 415 �rudi5 ,..� .z, Ott 0000 0000 0000 0000 {` }ate"`P 0000 0000 0000 0000 ko bw.ta..,' 0000 0000 0000 0000 4 00000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Matrix 1.Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Likelihood of Impacting Target of Failure Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2.Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Failure&Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate_ Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes,explanations,descriptions C..o-de,:,,,.awt 5cr )eodt are 4-4t, ,tom+ cow-.�o,.- -F-tee -�;1Ate CO Wlo' '.E- -1n0, J -1 \ \-\'tom PSCA-rew--c. A v [ `-O[D -It J 4 2 i lA- l, A . At e a C f o e 40 wAnA-Vi.rd.... ( t,itkv. -6,t5c4 5 co- er cay.,-oP..� t1ptAlac\1 + d;44-..--ce 4o b.-,\. t i t,mo J , Mitigation options C o C 8. ce p l`Ja t'�2 -) �.....'�' _ CeeS A1.... - w►1l v�d4 Residual risk c1l aef ktw,� Ak.-e e(4.x-q 1. ` a.w� t,.�;ll #_e - .r 4e �^c'e \AaZAtas Residual risk fa" /.Q<<� ` 'tta LyrItrayt.t -6ae5 IAA_0e_ . p__.ftrto.le t;uttowj- ec`, ay Residual risk A a•••-d re-D�aX,G p.v,c-E �Slpt,,4.3 (S*., . _ef. $.c ''rCe <'e,ra -6 --�) Residual risk 3 14)1. Overall tree risk rating Low 0 Moderate❑ High RIExtreme 0 Work priority 1❑ 2 0 3 El4❑ Overall residual risk Low 0 Moderate❑ High® Extreme D Recommended inspection interval I, okeet o..t\/ Data ®Final 0 Preliminary Advanced assessment needed®No❑Yes-Type/Reason // Inspection limitations ❑None 63Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe roDts kA.tf a4tviw`'� This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture(ISA)and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified(TRAQ)arborists-2013 V Page 2 of 2 ISA. Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client V— 4., Date Or (opt iaoat Time (()a.w Address/Tree location Tree no. 3 Sheet I, of Tree species (3a rr l ai•4 Ql.k. dbh 3),S"0 Height 65' Crown spread dia. t-45` Assessor(s) DJ,ets i k Time frame 1,Fic. trtorn. Tools used o'-'r_w\..c s t c.k t—Noe, Target Assessment Target zone Occupancy f. m a r = .'mac rate .°�m c mE I = o, •5i 1-rare An 'Liu IT c Target description ._ gL V..max z3 3-frequent c t, tm 3 F 4-constant a E C a 1 (,tk6-1-0 wte C5 3 Po lit) 2 ,uz,S,•`< 1e4, ><, 3 \o as a �rtr�, Kok 3 tJo 00 4 b,�; 3 1,30 CZd Site Factors History of failures l l z.. in )5 Topography Flags Slope❑ % Aspect - 1 a� Site changes None Grade change El Site clearing Changed soil hydrology❑ Root cuts$! Describe pQ )¢. f,41,t,....i4- 4;,tc ,,,,4 I,a-"- Soil conditions Limited volume 0 Saturated 0 Shallow 0 Compacted a Pavement overrootsf6l q0 ii% Describe bwt S,kQS< ? grt;-t- Prevailingwinddirection a Common weather Strong winds El Ice Snow 0 Heavy rain® Describe -}./p;tat. PL� ..,1c<,.-,t_e, Tree Health and Species Profile 7 Vigor Low❑ Normal ® High 0 Foliage None(seasonal)IS None(dead)0 Normal % Chlorotic (t) % Necrotic ;S % Pests (-,all 0eiSP4 _ ta-54e44-+0. \i�°wt t (oo tcS, Abiotic SeJGte rc84 (A,,.,-F0-e-)_'.n— Ucl.-- e :.IP S Species failure profile Branches l Trunk I Roots❑ 'Describe Load Factors Wind exposure Protected Partial Full El Wind funneling M roiµ.-treie•.a( '-ir;„-(- Relative crown size Small Medium® Large Crown density Sparse 0 Normal in Dense 0 Interior branches Few 0 Normal® Dense El Vines/Mi letoe/Moss 0 Recent or planned change in load factors Upt{L J (o-k -4„ ba C r ue.� ' t et".?4.e e6 5¢.1P te. Pooh a,,.,,.,,jc 40 ot, Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure —Crown and Branches— Unbalanced crown El LCR R - % Cracks 0 Lightning damage❑ Dead twigs/branches® _ S %overall Max.dia. a Codominant 0 Broken/Hangers Number 25 Max.dia. l� Included bark 0 Over-extended branches El / Weak attachments 0 Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Previous branch failures 0 Similar branches present 0 Pruning history Crown cleaned El Thinned 0 Raised ® Dead/Missing bark 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Reduced 0 Topped 0 Lion-tailed 0 Conks 0 Heartwood decay 0 Flush cuts 0 Other r Response growth Maainconcern(s) �rCtaL�L. k� ,(.,.♦�ce Ovef S,t,. matt `ol� , 4_ulfr. CP_,,..,ov,.-ei )f fa tI,- v,N Or.t e,,Jay• Se Jete rank .ekl._uo.ek5R. Will OCCta ( \eo ,V ,� ruk,wla -4MP d tnrga h-.;�t..te Load on defects N/A la Minor 0 Moderate❑ Significant 0 ✓ Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible® Probable 0 Imminent 0 —Trunk— -Roots and Root Collar— Dead/Missing bark 0 Abnormal bark texture/color 0 Collar buried/Not visible 0 Depth L(-(o'' Stem girdling 0 Codominant stems 51 Included bark 0 Cracks 0 Dead ® Decay Il Conks/Mushrooms 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sap ooze 0 Ooze 0 Cavity 0 %circ. Lightning damage❑ Heartwood decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms 0 Cracks 0 Cut/Damaged roots El Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poor taper 0 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness ElLean 5o- Corrected? y t 5 Response growth ' e I t it s t e e).-e) S)e - Response growth Mainconcem(s) etiA..rc r%r 1 v.-a`,,,, ts4c. ,- Mainconcern(s) w4v. r:‘,-)ewo-y \D'2:'1 f P,i�a.r 5P.t1e CP_ 1O0-4- ,a.^-, c tJ,U OCCcc Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ElModerate❑ Significant❑ Load on defect N/A❑ Minor Moderate❑ Significant ID Likelihood of failure Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible ffi Probable 0 imminent 0 \Improbable 0 Possible 0 Probable 0 Imminent 0 ,. Risk Categorization Likelihood v Failure Impact Failure&Impact Consequences E (from M3trIX i) 2 c 3 m Risk ro o w c m > . c rating _ v z d Conditions i _ m Target o --1 2 0 E, s a3 -, m o F of part U Tree part of concern ti ti f6protection E a a £ m fl m eo Eo m m` m m y (`trim > _ 7 > z y N Matrix2) ovec5,2ea It.5' 17 ` 2) Lux,_e 0 �„u� 00000000© 00 0.00 '�,trsa- 1 C�s 5����a 0000 0000 0000 000'C) Out(ill {��LL- $Lv 00000000 0000 0000 CO- 4 , 4" I: -.r, . P1..: 0t0000®0*000 0000 Lo 'a 2 �(I,t� od00 0000 0000 0000 00000000 0000 0000 ° o �i' D 3 uto(�e 00.000 = • 0000 00®0 w 3 coy "5C 0000 0 000 0000 0000 t;cs""Qac iOel 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4 00000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Matrix I.Likelihood matrix. Likelihood likelihood of Impacting Target of Failure Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely_ Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2.Risk raring matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Failure&Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely_ Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes,explanations,descriptions .55poef e., V.._Ca.,1. o.. (ookc r t eak-e 5eve_i c Ail, t/.a ,-;5 . t) Po,._ li)at1r- r,�r/9c 10.1 loe-'1 I` _ t.Pp.1�,.-oaea G Pic -Erevt-e t vv 9 -• 7G- - d ti O ' f A')TS .. t t1 OGc. I -tLu-c I t i.e r ..,.',,t.. -4-�.-e. e.t.-V.re �-C 4e - Mitigation options re1L -0vcct k ce * v'---!- t r1AvnoolA,t : ''P..()t.ryCL Residual risk V0.l,L i tp-1- 1 t 1 txw,it +tee �l..a k t l l NO ir C f vi t o Residual risk �ot( 1C` t o t 1 t 11 not t t AA e- At; '7�f 5 Residual risk .N t 1 �e a tt�q E bolt S Residual risk es Overall tree risk rating Low$ Moderate II High 0 Extreme 0 Work priority 1❑ 2® 3❑ 4❑ Overall residual risk Low® Moderate S High Cl Extreme❑ Recommended inspection interval I. -E',r.e 0,.17 Data F1Final ❑Preliminary Advanced assessment needed No❑Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations ❑None Wisibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe '- p 6-1-5 a *_ r 'U 1„.Ifi cu This datasheet was produced by the International Society of Atborilttee(LSA)and is intended for use by'five Risk Assessment Qualified(TRAQ)arborista-2013 January 4, 2021 To Whom It May Concern: I, Ken Han, legal owner of Danos Asset Management LLC. Legal owner of property address: 12555 SW Hall Blvd, Portland, OR 97223, grant permission to submit Tree Removal Permit, in behalf of the owner, by Chris Hall of Monster Tree Service. Ken Han, Owner Danos Asset Management LLC 12555 SW Hall Blvd Portland OR 97223 503-360-4429 ken@danoscapital.com ti -� •1:- .,i, w 'l ice +�. 4 Rrx }y, SYS / t 11 l�A l7 ., at you.,,7•4.:‘,...,'• fiii:mv: ,..7z: iii.'.'.1uhr,,t 4 ......H". .„,,,„_..{,..,., . ....,.. .,. .P.' -p; .1 ••'. /..;:miet,t--" ' - 7 Fxc t+6k 4 ,". g .�i.. ! + :14 �� va /^ 41' e .. x f F ' i� I t_ of 1� L , - ./_ �. tl[ 4,, i ! y , i •••t71 ♦ • lip fir li, : (��� ' + f It x ,a [ f. A r {. i if } + k . • •a, . ,.' ,.-.-,-.'.., . h,,'••,0 *'if. .7,e., "?'"',. + '-,'',".. -, If' .• ' "."z),ISO "" • ' "Nib7.4(4.III41,, k4.•-'__:_..)'' ',: r'" '''''S'''''';.""t.'.... r- ,,\'',, -,,, :• 1..;:',•1., -4.4•0;;‘,' ''s-‘,.'• .'..i,,C.,:i.i.i...;;:.- ''','',."Zkl'k'ililtgl*Z..:::•'.v; ..1:;' `1'. ''''' •'4' ttopt t ,o. 4‘A.,...,. ,,_,„., .,, ,4.2.,,,,,,.„,44-, . - . , .- ._.,. .. 1".., 7 ".,,k. " 1 -,4* Nt, ,r, ' "IA:\:, :* '., ', ,.4 ig.:.'!:11:.b. IT,,..:',A1 , '-•., ky, cl,,,.'„., A . —i.i.", n !... ., ' "r g'g, .,...•;",...i'.','"'..,'4•.:i..i...t..;. ../',1,, ;;;.,:g. • . / --,,__,,' .,„ %.-'i ,'„-- -e. ,,'•‘ i ,' '.....4'.•.--V4-. -,::,..*J-' 1*V-' 7..$;-ii--ilfai••g2.g'0;. \It -:.,. ,., , • '. . ' ' --'.• • ••.'•.1,;\ '' '..,;.•,..•-...6,i1 .4 ",•'... '''.t.. 71 .,..•.:Z.;*, ffiA.':'...- ...'-'s.;',4 4°. \\ ,;\ ' . -...i*•-•,#.9 .. . '''''' 'k*t','ia-i .',,.'!"' : '' 15714'1 .- - ' ... -!‘ . . , ,‘ '' , ,'.- ;•-g'i..;. ,IA gig ,/;,ii,t,1.;•.•-krt..i!:„,,),,g,,,„* _;; „,,, 14 ' • PE"."7-1"4"..- . !'4,,'";?... '" 1.,.. li? • ,,,... .i,f--Ak' i'.411'firl !,,„, „,--., '..,',..,.......,.., '',,...7-..7,•g•g.",,,P.''''‘i,,....ig:'',4-7-# . . , •-‘:•..7,.,,;,/,,..'1',.'4 egig.. 4i „ ,'"; 4,4 '3'.' '.// ,I f- ' .'-' • i. ,... t.g.,..t-... ,.,, -,p. ..,,%,Pg.-.,- .4.,..-.'.......-,......•'Ir. . .k. , .P..•".-g- T?if , , ,,., -.i.;.;i' ...: ,,...1...,,,-.,,,,•,,,„ //.: , it' ' . r . . ' .,--,. i r" 'L ' i.--- —. i•f ,:: ' o NIIIIIP......._ ,"' - .- .Y. , . . !lir**. to i ,,J:N*-a' .,. , -„F 4-t,':f -,', '' „.' •' o 'i, I. -, ,ig, ,. ." "','!i '''...," ( 0'A:116.- i::: * ''...::. lie 'slt ••• .t••.• . . r. ..c'•, 1 ...- , , " • i/ . :Or',7 k•-•:.‘•; ":...'.17' '.':: * •' ..,, IN-tte.f.1" .,'-=., ,, ,,‘ . ifr' Ii Ji' f ..- S . ,..!" 1 1 ,;.i,,,•• �,_. M*e E �i J'� T 1. . ' ',� A, `'Mi; 0-1 a # 'k y \ Y \ AA4 'av{r"..y6�;, a +y k.ri 'IPA `M""M1M` iv i b $ yy l f• Ifrxj), S4��' t SSSy ! :r .. / fY Y ri 1 1 IGit C Y. \# ... k t r 11 r.71a r'�: .±� "ri`•"ww •� `� �,eKr-F� yq � w"' yy YS• _! I 1 ` /i r 1.'d /fie.. . ' .vt F 'A.qc < 'a:pSy'� \iZ' pd s ; ry4.2k.T.33,�7:44 s 3 !�. R 14. tr .. {9,.! of , ( f * # , "al.� IR-t /},p��Tjj'.;i,�y�j, q' ''K�•9i`r 8 �'� r+ '"�. h ifs°' fr�iW Z 'i ry±;G� a✓G �t.� plit� rn v ;< rt y, `''Y` �'"' 'e' �` "�t i `�n`` t i T e ,w C 4 1 +� hx E_ ,h tMr $ '. .4 . d' 1 P e _ I 41 :a r _ #: \. J ' 4 w r' Vigi , ':t i l \��. •b_w' ,a 1. • ''''.4 %\,,,..-%' ' t;11, •' .,'-'4.,'..',,t; ., -, tom .��„ jJ x '4 1 ' . t i+iks'v L ;41Sir.- /, \.. .;_ V i a 4 ya,+"q I . ` p 4 ° ; FT A;: 4 n`l f.{111.i Jc f. ti' ,u 3M1' X1#sj *.,,. Yp'`iimay, a s .4 4 � > r y.. rr ' i{JJ r' I�''�. �' A. ,. ...,,, • ,.....- . ! 1 i, i‘''''' '1'•- 1" 1 k V\-.' •• ,, .: 11P1 iltp%' Agirw A - -- ,-.--.i 400..1 , ..... . , , A • p .." , ... , ... , 0011.- _ ____------- ,,''- _ ------ -.- , ........ * . _ A• ... P :- . I - . ,.; :*i r.i* . • ,i.,,,I, i:l• , •i , :*(14-situ 1, iv,4:. -II -A, ''' • ,,,,•; . -ii'rI, ---......_ ' V CV . x pr.y r x I �e +K �y „ c it' r:".. :''44: ''''....,.4',.',,'.7.'„'''' 1„). • sss,s _�. i6R T= '- `a rY,„,1 �,Y Y � 's ro'. S r;s •.+rsf . l`.4� t )* . ma .Via l; i r JAy a iv -ttB' `.;i t +pl, 'tl r' , ', j9 #oE' \ ` � R kY g4,�,. yr Infr `1. p }', C s, wLu{�k , 4' 'f •�� { •�` 4 34 t < ' 1� ;$ k* A of �.���. "%r' x Ca S • iri` t �-{ t.. .7. .,.„,...mi,.t.40„,r,„..., .., . • y ,...d r • 'ti AQ '+err L_ i ,.., f . .fg � s5 * '+' ,9� 1« = .,.as k J R$ u f • Y, `s a' ref �� :t 1 �'';.'''#!" 'f�' S _ _ .fir& a , a x x�" so- ,N��y �' r:j�: j P tii fy ." Irk ( • T' ' V � ,r of � i• ; #Sy�d rrM# w' Pt� A'ey ,- u ./ N /�T{ r ' „,,, , • • * ) ' ' ---- 0 • -.... ..-ili kof,11 • , .. ,t,t • . , .,. '. '. , ,',.:,,,;•:::k.-401,',. V.:, , . ' , ' ''''';'-?.frjr4 V..,' ;.'','.;141,-,.\i,1kt ‘,.• , , •:::..- `.1r,'-,'-,;,Adul,:,,,„„.%li. ii?7,,f*,11,1APOVZ•'`•(;',•:, ., ' ' , 4 - 1,44 A 1, 4,,,,,,., .• ,,,,.,"..I',":,'.;•?.-V94,1776';',5,kpf..',i7".1,,i,et,'„t":,.:,"1,r,'".4”. ,, '-,.i'4!"., ".: , . 1/4, , ..i.A. ,-.) -.•. . '. :,y4,4,-.. .a...•.?.,x,,!.',,.,it.,.tp.,,Ayi•,,.,,,..,,,-;. ,,,I,•,,,.:.: -?.,,2:',.,t.,,.4,.,-, -1,-.0.,. . ,, ,- '. , . 4 . i'- "-.' ' ,V . .,z...,, . .-.. ,. '; ','',,•:,,'''ri,1.—,n'i:-•:',3t,...;',$,S.1,417.1.,‘p,,,i,-,,,,.,:. t . - .'. • 4 ., ..., ,,,. . ..-......, i1-,,,,44 4.,4,•„,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,...,,,..:•,.• '••-,, - •-• :, , , ,, , '•,,•'„:••:.;;:i',..:qt,k•'!,L.s.,,,:;.,,,,!•,0,1,,,,.714., 1„„, .,•,,k','•"‘'' ' '', • , • - i ' t , ' ' • '7.;:- ::':'-‘4' ir . . , „,..,......-is,,....„,...:„.f„..*41 -yl t4t,.-Fi.—.,,,,,t.,..-.. .,. ..,,,,,..;.:,:, ....• .,: , t 4. ..,.., .f i 7 al,\;;,•,*. ..' • , ' : ,-,,.,IN.,„_, :I, '',.',t;',',1..!;Vi.`-''',;-•'-•.''..c"-4,:',,',0',Ogiv,*.i.;05.': 4.tg"...-e.4414',4i--,' '.,,.,...,;,,, • , . , , , , , ,.• , --••-;i! ..-'t:::-C'''''‘ '''''''.'4'.'.''•,,W,..*.tt'., ,, .. ', ,`.' ' 1 ••:,i,..,..:`,i .:,,., , ., ...,',..:,;,.,' `. .,..:::•,;'-i.. .:1'44,4,:,.'t.'..., .i'.„:',t,,,..',‘,. ';.7';:i, . . .-',':;.‘'.-,:,,,,,'.,;.,,,,, .:.. ..-.'‘;.'.'.:;.Y.',.''. Yl› ::',.. ,:;.,.'',=..A7';• ',''' '- ' I. 1-,-;:).''' ' -,- ''.. ' - • .''''' ' . ' ::-' . i'...,,''''.. ..'''''.'•-''f.'.'-',';'•,":':'''4?-.4.7-,.':',,,*4,- L. ; •q,.7.-.',.'",' '‘,,!,. , ..'"` q410....' ' " ' • ',,::,.. . =. ''. 'L. •-' :. ,' .'....:..''.).',.'-',;',,,'!.-.".''.!:,;,..'''• ..-Z1,1-.N.,A ''''''• .;'' 4t:, , . • , 1 -.:;', ,--..• • .;I. • .... ,. ; '•..- '. " ...:'`,-\'''-. -,:"..‘'lef.;`,:,:"f'" -,.,',F.,,‘ ,. , ' 0 •,.,„..,i' . - • '," ,. , -,,,' . '',..c.t'l.v.;.:... :',1'`..,.1:14,,,,FT:...".,e''.'• - .-.' '',..4 , . •,,,: ,••• . , . ;:,.• .- . ,,...;,,. •- :..,,,..4...1-$:;004..„ .-:- ,,- .. .--;,,,, ..• ,,t.'rotr...,..v.0.4.7, -,- ; ' ' 7 ' '1 ' i'' . , ,-.'1.,..',:";; .',..7,',.,v,•,,,,;46.§i:':!vJY,,, .,k'''', ,', , r • . ..' '. , . • ,• •'' .;':'4.- .. .,'''',',. ''4, ,'?.1e, ''''' '..j,r.ji01 ' ._ .45 R P. s e Y yi . • . - s • a .� .,4' r fir�`. Cb � � cr .. T44#votti err y *, r „ s f r lyi T r _ r bb ¢' htEf ' t t , yS 3n Y .kT yyd ' 02 W� r ( .#./ 4.H A, 61 Tl a, :' 7 t r.t M AP F ,fP rr I 9•:7 C 7 1 , A. �j T � • 4-if' 'v f 3�' y i wY('' 4 P p y s EA • • r ^ � j�1,,- � ` T6 . . „ i yam[ ,:r�,., f.. Y `,. �!, btu P i Ii � / a ,l VVV kY' �J. x.. \gyp-. �e .. / P.k} OOP • R� +• � 4 ' A • • 4 y1 R7y eW�� rf