UFR2020-00003 NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION
URBAN FORESTRY REVIEW UFR2020-0000311114
MODIFICATION OF URBAN FORESTRY PLAN FOR
WRIGHT PARTITION TIGARD
120 DAYS = December 15, 2020
SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY
FILE NAME: Wright Partition
CASE NO.: Urban Forestry Review(UFR) UFR2020-00003
PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to modify the urban forestry plan approved under the
Wright Partition (Case No. MLP2018-00002). In the original urban forestry plan
from Case No. MLP2018-00002, the applicant proposed to plant five (5) new trees
on Lot 1, and to remove seven (7) trees and plant five (5) new trees on Lot 2. The
applicant now proposes to modify this urban forestry plan by planting only one (1)
new tree on Lot 1,and retaining all existing trees on Lot 2.Additionally,the applicant
no longer proposes to plant new trees on Lot 2.
APPLICANT: Garo Wright
6815 SW Walnut Terrace
Tigard, OR 97223
OWNERS: Garo and Crystal L. Wright
6815 SW Walnut Terrace
Tigard, OR 97223
LOCATION: 6815 SW Walnut Terrace;WCTM 1S125DA,Tax Lot 2400
BASE ZONE: R-4.5: Low Density Residential Zone
APPLICABLE
REVIEW
CRITERIA: Community Development Code (CDC) Chapter 18.420.060.F
SECTION II. DECISION
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has
APPROVED the above request.The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in
Section IV.
UFR2020-00003 Wright Partition—Urban Forestry Plan Modification 1
SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Site Information:
The 0.41-acre site is located on the north side of SW Walnut Terrace,west of SW 65th Avenue, and east
of SW 69th Avenue. The property is also located south of the City's border with unincorporated
Washington County,and west of the City's border with the City of Portland. In September 2018,the City
of Tigard Planning Division approved a two-lot partition on the subject site (Case No.MLP2018-00002).
The site is zoned R-4.5 (Low-Density Residential),as are adjacent properties.
SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS
18.420.060.F.Urban forestry plan modification. Except as exempted in Paragraph 18.420.060.F.1,
an application to modify the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval is processed
through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, using the approval criteria in
Paragraph 18.420.060.F.2.
The applicant proposes to modify the urban forestry plan approved under the Wright Partition (Case No.
MLP2018-00002). In the original urban forestry plan from Case No. MLP2018-00002, the applicant
proposed to plant five (5) new trees on Lot 1, and to remove seven (7) trees and plant five (5) new trees
on Lot 2. The applicant now proposes to modify this urban forestry plan by planting only one (1) new
tree on Lot 1, and retaining all existing trees on Lot 2. Additionally, the applicant no longer proposes to
plant new trees on Lot 2. This proposal results in a lesser amount of total tree canopy from the original
urban forestry plan, and is therefore not exempt from a Type I urban forestry plan modification.
Accordingly,this application is subject to the approval criteria outlined below.
2. Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions the
modification to the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval when all of the
following are met:
a. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement
certifying that the previously approved urban forestry plan did not account for the
circumstances that led to the proposed modification;
The applicant and property owner has submitted a written statement indicating that the previously
approved urban forestry plan did not account for the circumstances that led to the proposed
modification, and the project arborist (Stephen Phoenix of Tree Care Unlimited, LLC) has provided a
revised urban forestry plan supplemental report. During land use review,the applicant originally planned
to develop on Lot 2, including constructing a new single detached house, installing landscaping and
planting trees, and other on-site improvements. However, due to financial constraints, the applicant is
no longer able to develop on Lot 2, and now proposes to sell Lot 2 as a vacant lot. Accordingly, the
applicant now proposes to retain all trees that were proposed for removal on Lot 2. Additionally, the
applicant no longer proposes to plant new trees on Lot 2.This criterion is met.
b. The project arborist or landscape architect has provided a report and statement
certifying that there is no practicable alternative to the proposed modification; and
The applicant and property owner has submitted a written statement indicating that there is no practicable
alternative to the proposed modification, and the project arborist has provided a revised urban forestry
plan supplemental report.This criterion is met.
c. The project arborist or landscape architect demonstrates compliance with Subsection
18.420.060.B through a modified urban forestry plan. (Ord. 18-28 §1)
UFR2020-00003 Wright Partition—Urban I orestry Plan Modification 2
The project arborist submitted a revised urban forestry plan and supplemental report that demonstrate
compliance with CDC 18.420.060.B,including tree preservation,protection, and canopy standards. This
criterion is met.
CONCLUSION: As demonstrated in the analysis above, the proposed modification to the urban
forestry plan component of the approved Wright Partition meets all applicable
approval criteria.
SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION
Notice:
Notice was provided to:
X The applicant and owner
Final Decision:
A modification to the urban forestry plan component of a land use approval is a Type I procedure. As
such, this decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the
applicant,whichever occurs first. This decision is not appealable locally, and is the final decision of the
City.
THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 17, 2020,
AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 18, 2020.
Questions:
If you have any questions,please contact Lina Smith at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCSCa,tiggard-or.gov.
August 17.2020
APPROVED BY: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner
Community Development Director's Designee
UFR2020-00003 Wright Partition—Urban Forestry Plan Modification 3
APPROVED
LinaCS , 15:45:27, 08/17/2020
SRE
. ., -.. a
6151,,IAAL I,
\ u,w..a.
\ 1 \ 4
m¢uw.arsh / \ VICINT-MAP-NOT TO SCALE
\ / INE.X w. 0 - ki
/ ww,w,w.aw ,a;aa:::` ,...." ,..„ a
, • aa'..n
c
L.
^ Oxp TREE V'NOM CALCULATORS 15
/.
.w nuxe rorcT a .• _ _. ,: ,R.,,,
w»,, .,oa„ow.m....a.,..,,A,
c.WOOD FENCE-7
o..1O�R".....I. mI�a.w.I `1 „w w,m. J assuol:.mun l-.....n.< aow....naAwa iaww•.wc mawase
oSl"ac' lCs§a7.'. :al,w...>w.M1".` `"' . w.. _�� ::;:::T:„,..:=;=:,.;.:::::,-;......_,....,_.,....._ i
a
1.... - 4 0
'J 8O OUP Qoss IN /
o �
— -- — ` ,lam ._ N_ ` /
0-77666666
\ / SURVEY LEOENO-EXISTING FEATURES Z
CI
611
/ \ e.,wr an,. is rtw m`.,`,cs, ____... yt1'e,` ELI
. , °- w- Q O
\\ \ ❑E,
WOEJ. " ZNo
` AREA ;R;i _,r�. :-. �roaM ACCESS AND
M.u. a V E U PI
no HUY rpASEVENT FOR THE r -- s... 4 f Z
o
BLNEFII OF PARCEL 1 °� 5 O
nww.xuumur R Z J Z
\ s, .. ....�.........,. 1 Q r 3 w li
s.o 'I a� . 2 1 3 3
II FLL
ii
�p �. s. o'_ wk, t.
- N '17,52'W• k Rs 89 R wK'v - nE
1. Y SS
,rco...
Lica _ „--s—„ _,� -. I 'sue. ,`\ L� ,I
h +—e J � Ij'tF— T I�
-7--•• 4t«�_J t_ „—. .,—_„ - _
TREE cuuovv PLAN xrvcvnL NOTES: �� 4
I t a , ono E
. ,owe �,Al w r .�,r 1
6,
Slam,. RoHm.Jul OR TOW-10 vem. C\U...¢\moons' .,ktOp\Bs9-24S-i>Gorn-PrsiMnnry I .canopy a.R
plc rv/'I/ nw/01-e 'vi_.
,a// -97-.ec s
IRS , ; `�.R
Name: Garo Wright ?/e 0
Location: 6815 SW Walnut Ter,Tigard,OR 97223 Date: 3>t< 1. -.----
Arborist: Stephen Phoenix PN-7593A
COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME DBH CANOPY SPREAD OPEN OR STAND TREE HERITAGE TREE COND.RATING PRESERVATION.RATING MOVE RETAIN COMMENT'
#1. Maple Acer 8" 8'Radius Stand No 3 3 Reta
#2Japa nese Maple Acer palmatum 8" 8'Radius Stand No 2 2 Remove
#3 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 24" 24'Radius Stand No 3 3 Remove
#4 Pacific Madrone Arbutus menziesii 24" 24'Radius Stand No 3 2 Remove
#5 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 36" 35'Radius Stand No 1 0 Remove/Con. alo the trunk
#6 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 30" 30'Radius Stand No 1 0 Remove/E dence of ...ed top
#7 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 24" 24'Radius Stand No 1 0 Remove run k damage,: •und fungus,suspect root rot
#8 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 44" 44'Radius Stand No 1 0 Rem. e/Ground fungus susp- t root rot
#9 White Oak Quercus alba 13" 13'Radius Stand No 3 3 Ra, .in
#10 Douglas Fir Pseudotsuga menziesii 36" 36'Radius Stand No 3 3 etaln
Urban Forestry Plan—Supplemental Report Example Template
Effective Tree Canopy Cover Summary
*Lot# Lot Area(ft2) 2x Canopy 2x Canopy 1.5x Canopy Mature 1.25x Mature 1.25x Mature Total Canopy Effective
(exclude Area (ft2) of Area(ft2) of Area (ft2) of Canopy Canopy Canopy Area(ft2)per Canopy
streets) Preserved Preserved Preserved Area (ft2) of Area (ft2) of Area (ft2) of lot (Canopy
Trees Stands Native Trees Non-Native Native Planted Area
(w/ cond. (w/ cond. < 6-inch Planted Planted Stands Lot Area)
and res.>>>2 and res>2 DBH Trees Trees
raw
�m p ,
L ,
_
".::!
A ,tom -,
i e :' iI
4
.... m" W ,,,, 4,,, ty . ,„, # 1.1, ;I {mod�. ',"""47,1 $w
S2 l( ri u$,� :, 0.
Total x � ,,. v
*Note: effective tree canopy cover must be calculated for each lot designated for single detached house development in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5,R-4.5 and
R-7 zones.
The minimum requirements for effective tree canopy cover are outlined below:
• Subdivisions and land partitions:
o 40 percent for the overall development site in the R-1, R-2, R-3.5, R-4.5 and R-7 zones, and 15 percent for each lot
designated for single detached house development.
o 33 percent for the overall development site in the R-12,R-25, and R-40 zones.
• Apartments: 33 percent for the overall development site.
• Nonresidential development: 33 percent for the overall development site, except nonresidential development in the MU-CBD,
MUC-1, I-L, and I-H zones and schools (as defined in TCDC Section 18.60.050 J) are only required to provide 25 percent for the
overall development site.
• Mobile home parks: 33 percent for the overall development site.
• Wireless communication facilities: zero percent for the overall development site.
Urban Forestry Plan—Supplemental Report Example Template
Planted Tree Inventory
Tree# Genus sp./ Caliper(Decid.) or Mature Canopy Mature Canopy Available Comments
Common Height(Ever reen) S1read ( Area (ft2) Soil Volumee ft1.3)
(k +,: } �- r _ r.r j.- . ,1 A't fir. u§.W.'i. +I F� "'�`.. „'.
r
1 M ti,� 1 ni 2. ,1 1' , - its ,,_ -
sip k._ ,
Planted Stand Inventory
Stand# Genus sp./Common 1 Hgt. or Container size No. of Trees Avg. Spacing(ft) Total Mature Comments
Genus sp./Common 2 H•t.or Container size No. of Trees Avg. Spacing(ft) Canopy Area(ft2)
Genus sp./Common 3 Hgt. or Container size No.of Trees Avg. Spacing(ft) Delineated at the
Genus sp./Common 4 Hgt. or Container size _No. of Trees Av_. S.acin_ (ft) Outer Edge of
Genus sp./Common 5 Hgt. or Container size rNo. of Trees A .. S acin (ft) the Stand
=i
if
s
APPLICANT
MATERIALS
Case #: UFR2020-00003
City of Tigard
!PI . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1IGARD Master Land Use Application
Yr>".Yvv.. u+ ... .. M..swi'¢YiYd4r..LdaStitttt:Cxy.YilM4fY+la'YSi rn:'1.
LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE
❑ Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADC)) O Modification: O Type I O Type II
O Adjustment 0 Planned Development•.
O Annexation O Consolidated Plan
O Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment O Concept Plan
O Conditional Use O Detailed Plan
O Downtown Development Review: 0 Sensitive Lands Review:
O Type I O Type II O Type I O Type II Li Type Ill
❑ Adjustment 0 Site Development Review: C] Type I C_] Type II
O Home Occupation—Type 11 0 Subdivision
❑ Iand Partition 0 Temporary Use Permit
O Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation JEL Urban Forestry Plan:
O Marijuana Facility Permit X,Modification O Discretionary Review
❑ Miscellaneous: 0 Zoning Map Amendment
C Type II ^ Type III
PROJECT INFORMATION n
Project name: t �.�(z 4� 1'iPtcl- -
Brief description of project: ,Nc,S'NQ+J ci+ IZ
G.A .CL1.A" Ler P1iM (4.3
attict� Type I urban forestry modification for MLP2018-00002
SITE INFORMATION
Location (address if available): (oS t' S u) kd d TER¢PrC G
Tax map and tax lot number(s): Lod CTIM 15125 pt t_tsT At- 2400
Site size: 5t Zone: —
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name: Goort�
Mailing address: (p`2.)‘ 5 Ste.-1 �Lku‘1\7\- f City/State: 1 ( ) Zip: Ch
Phone: 5 O sets Email: C-aare)WRAC/Ali-iCl- i- lw 9 CV it\
Applicant's representative: 5Ayr)a
Phone: Email:
City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 2
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION ptSame as applicant
(Attach list for additional owners)
Name: C/Qd''P k C S WA..IZ 6wl
Mailing address: l City/State: Zip:___
Phone: Email:
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
in addition to this application form,you must submit all required items listed in Subsection 18.710.030.0 of
Tigard's Community Development Code. If you are unsure what is required with your application,please contact
the planner on duty at 503-718-2421 or t ;ardplannerondurya4tigard-or.guv.
I certify that I am the property owner or I am eligible to initiate this application,as provided in the Tigard
Community Development Code. To the best of my knowledge,all the information provided within this application
• e is co . .1eand ace te. / .
iii
a.r0\t r"4,8 LOA"— /..7,12-0Z,L'
,,1 is signature* la
Print name _ Dare
ax
;q1d— 4 ) /-*/—i.-.10--6
' •-rty owner's si, a re* Print name Dare
, . 4 tam5i-At lAlctici-- Ce/s/7.4>z
Prope -owner's signs, -* Print nazipe Date
*The owner must sign this application or submit a separate written authorization when the owner and applicant are
different people.
'-I 111 t "i. ()\11
Case No.: UFR2020-00003 Application fee: $808 Received by: LS Date: 8/4/20
Related Case(s):MI P2(11 A-flf)Of12 Determined complete by: Date:
City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oiegun 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of 2
Narrative:6815 SW Walnut Terrace,Tigard OR,97223
Lot Owner. Garo and Crystal Wright
Subject Revised: Tree Protection Plan Related to Partition
Tree Canopy Fee Calculation(if applicable)
If the percentage of effective tree canopy cover is less than the applicable standard percentage for
the overall development:
1. Find the required ft2of tree canopy:
(overall development site area) x (standard required% (40%, 33%,or 25%)).
Response: The City of Tigard Requires 40% tree canopy of the overall site area. Parcel is
7,715 Square feet. Parcel 2 is 8,168 Square Feet(excluding the flag lot access area). The
total site development area is 15,883 square feet. Forty percent of the total site development
are is 6,353 square feet. As shown on the site revised tree protection plan this standard is
met. At the time of future development on Parcel 2 existing trees will be cut as needed by
the developer. This standard is met.
2. Find the ft2 of tree canopy the development is short:
(required ft2of tree canopy from 1 above) - (proposed ft2of tree canopy).
Response: Parcel is 7,715 Square feet. Parcel 2 is 8,168 Square Feet(excluding the flag lot
access area). The City requires 15%tree canopy per lot. 15% of Parcel 1 is 1,157 square feet
and 15% f parcel 2 is 1,225 square feet. This standard is met as shown on the site plan
submitted with this application.
3. Find the$value of tree canopy:
(PNW-ISA wholesale median cost for a 3"deciduous tree in the Willamette Valley) - 59.
Response: No trees will be removed on either parcel. One native pacific dogwood will be
planted on parcel 1 which will increase tree canopy. No trees are proposed to be removed
on Parcel 2 therefore this criteria is not applicable to this application. At the time of future
development on Parcel 2 the developer will submit a median cost related to tree removal.
4. Find the required tree canopy fee:
(amount of ft2 of tree canopy from 2 above) x (the$value of tree canopy from 3 above).
If the overall development meets the applicable standard percentage,but the percentage of effective
tree canopy cover is less than 15% for any individual lot designated for single detached house
development in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 zones:
1. Find the required ft2 of tree canopy for the deficient lot
(lot area) x 15%.
Response: Both parcels meet the minimum requirements. Parcel 1 will plant one Pacific
Dogwood Tree to ensure 15% tree canopy requirements as shown on the revised tree
protection plan. These standards are met.
2. Find the ft2of tree canopy the lot is short:
(required ft2 of tree canopy from 1 above) - (proposed ft2 of tree canopy).
Response: Parcell is 7,715 Square feet. One additional Pacific Dogwood is proposed to be
planted to ensure 15%tree canopy requirements are met. Please refer to tree planting plan
for additional details related to calculations.
3. Find the value of tree canopy:
$ PY
(PNW-ISA wholesale median cost for a 3" deciduous tree in the Willamette Valley)_ 59.
Response: No trees will be removed on either parcel. One native pacific dogwood will be
planted on parcel 1 which will increase tree canopy. No trees are proposed to be removed
on Parcel 2 therefore this criteria is not applicable to this application. At the time of future
development on Parcel 2 the developer will submit a median cost related to tree removal.
4. Find the required tree canopy fee:
(amount of ftz of tree canopy from 2 above) x (the $value of tree canopy from 3 above).
Response: No trees will be removed on either parcel. One native pacific dogwood will be
planted on parcel 1 which will increase tree canopy. No trees are proposed to be removed
on Parcel 2 therefore this criteria is not applicable to this application. At the time of future
development on Parcel 2 the developer will submit a median cost related to tree removaL
Signature of Approval
I hereby attest that:
1.The Tree Preservation and Removal site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,
Part 1 of the Urban Forestry Manual;
2.The Tree Canopy site plan meets all of the requirements in Section 10,Part 2 of the Urban
Forestry Manual;and
3.The Supplemental Report meets all of the requirements in Section 10,Part 3 of the Urban
Forestry Manual.
Response: I certify that the above tree preservation plan meets all requirements of Section
10,Part(s) 1,2 and 3 of the Urban Forestry Manual
Steve Phoenix J Certified Arborist
Tree Care Unlimited, LIC
PO Box 1566 I Lake.Oswego,OR 97035
M.503.793.1881 O.50 3.657.6570
Signature:
Date: f Zq / jj
Lina Smith
From: Garo Wright <Garo.Wright@ecpowerslife.com>
Sent: Thursday,June 18, 2020 11:10 AM
To: Lina Smith
Cc: Brady Bullinger;Trent Brickey; steve bloomquist
Subject: FW: Revised Tree Canopy Plan Draft
Attachments: 998-245-Partition-Preliminary Tree Canopy TREE CANOPY(1).pdf
Caution!This message was sent from outside your organization. Allow sender I Block sender
Lina,
Due to the world situation and economic uncertainty, we have decided not to build the house on the new
back lot. Our original documents showed the foot print of the house we were intending to build, which was
huge and which required us to remove several trees. Thus we were required to plant 10 new trees to replace
the canopy area that we were removing. Since we decided not to remove any trees, we want to get rid of
the requirement to add the 10 new trees shown on the approved documents and to get the tree bond
back. The attached drawing is a first attempt/draft of the revised tree canopy plan showing NO TREES BEING
REMOVED. I need some direction of what all I need to do to make this move forward. I assume there may be a
plan revision fee that needs to be paid and maybe some request for revision forms to be filled out. Please
review this information and let me know what my next step should be.
Regards,
Garo
First of 2 emails. The next email will have a copy of the approved plans.
Garo Wright
CC Project Manager, EC Electric
M: (503) 347-8028
E: Garo.Wright@ecpowerslife.com I W: www.ecpowerslife.com
A: 2121 NW Thurman Street, Portland, Oregon 97210
oloctric
in El
Consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
From: Bloomquist, Steve<Steve.Bloomquist@portofportland.com>
Sent:Tuesday,June 16, 2020 11:44 AM
To:Garo Wright<Garo.Wright@ecpowerslife.com>
Cc: 'Bodey219@gmail.com'<Bodey219@gmail.com>
Subject:Tree Canopy Plan Draft
[EXTERNAL—Please use caution.]
Hi Garo,
t
I just finished this up. Could you send this to the City and copy me? I think I have everything I just want to make sure
before I print. This should get the conversation started.
Thanks,
Steve
2
F 2 n ...
B
.,.....
\ 5E
\ _ - G5� 4 —T...
/ .v CwY.4.9R /� ..� �Ai PNN4.,9v:tic ml aeAmiMwaWpO �\ �___
�/`uP. ,.....er• 4 iE
+nay} VIC INKY AMP-NOT TO SCALE 'j
\ / \ `/ ""' rm uiwcl wron\\ a !6N
\ v a. F
L..,,` / o 4« TREE CANOPY CALCULATIONS 1 E
apooLe FE - .muc.emenm.w..[ewnrumnq
\ B'MOOS FENCE.,
ET.e.z: K'"° .'.N..N. Na...«,..pP.f.o . ,e,a..,,.,Wx.,......x,w.«.....,.
ef.om.� \.ala � \\ ,,.,.o1.,,...o.,.MIN..,..,��x�.�..«.ua...,....�,«�...,. aq50 .S
s,9.§r3'oa"F e 7o.95' /
—_ �( ,�I Ar ; S N
� V L/D7 .. /
� o / .� SURVEY LEGEND-EXISTING FEATURES Z
\ i.e rt.eaw.arsrtiMir(LF srs, .. \bra-' •• �.� Q Q
\ \ J> N GE\
NORM SEWER --_ ¢ d
EAST VIENT FOR TEE s 0�1-
b PARCH_NEFII OF PARC 1 29
I flfl1I 1 13n
( F
fro r. o
I .84e \ 1_5. O.i . .—
\ ? Na.en/'S2"N. b 85.89 3 .+.su .� ..x...". O
Di e 1
Ivv L I1 v_ ,
,_ _ R-, v _- _,- _ - —
_.,,—s Da b
m—
� — D—v —x—v wg r. c
i,M — - —m - ,_ RE CANOPY FLAN O Pell
. � v��w .��Yyt -'—a— . a m a_�v s��
L n - r."”/ o"a"TreMn.im nKroa.*.-=+..mere mroxue.'
1 o [e ,
aE- a. ..mn.,v.w.c.v,ux.mo.n..:wexowee........:
WA.OFF R9RAT•RI PATEL].[noon-a..sum ma....nor,um wen..•=gauvemEnrr,
oo. on
Doom., Fiou.a: .w OO,2020-10.l2m. C\U...\bloom.\Dermp\OSS_215-Permien-Peeloia..r Tree Como!e.y