The URL can be used to link to this page

SLR2020-00002 NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION MMD2020-00023 : SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR2020-00002 FRED SHEARER & SONS, INC. TIGARD 120 DAYS = November 24, 2020 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Fred Shearer& Sons, Inc. CASE NO.: Minor Modification(MMD) MMD2020-00023 Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2020-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes a minor modification to an existing development at 8015 SW Hunziker Road. Specifically, the applicant proposes minor additions to the existing industrial building(including adding a new covered deck,and a new canopy with a ramp and stairs),and minor modifications to on-site parking,landscaping,and trees. This application also includes a sensitive lands review because the applicant proposes minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations involving less than 50 cubic yards of material within the Clean Water Services(CWS)vegetated corridor, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)special flood hazard area. APPLICANT: Christie Architecture Attn: Lisa Christie 9532 SW 18th Place Portland, OR 97219 OWNER: 8015 Hunziker,LLC 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard, OR 97223 LOCATION: 8015 SW Hunziker Road;WCTM 2S101BD,Tax Lot 300 ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L: Light Industrial Zone. The I-L zone provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including, but not limited to: industrial services, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare, odor, or vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.410, 18.420, 18.510, and 18.765.060.D MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request.The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The subject property is located at 8015 SW Hunziker Road,on the north side of SW Hunziker Road, east of SW Hall Boulevard, and west of SW 72°d Avenue. The development site is made up of one (1) tax lot (WCTM 2S101BD, Tax Lot 300), and contains one (1) industrial building, with associated parking and landscaping.The site is zoned Light Industrial(I-L),as are adjacent properties to the north,south,and east. The adjacent property to the west is zoned Parks and Recreation (PR), and contains a locally significant wetland,stream,and CWS vegetated corridor. City maps indicate that these sensitive lands extend onto the subject property. The subject site is also located in the FEMA special flood hazard area,but is not located in the floodway. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS 18.330 Industrial Zone Development Standards: 18.330.040 Development Standards A. Base zone development standards are provided in Table 18.330.1. The applicant proposes a minor modification to an existing development at 8015 SW Hunziker Road. Specifically, the applicant proposes minor additions to the existing industrial building (including adding a new covered deck, and a new canopy with a ramp and stairs), and minor modifications to on-site parking,landscaping,and trees. Staff reviewed the applicant's materials to confirm the proposed building additions will comply with minimum setbacks and maximum building height for the I-L Zone. Additionally, the applicant's materials demonstrate that the site will continue to comply with the maximum lot coverage standard (85 percent). Standards for parking and landscaping are addressed in the findings below.These standards are met. B. Landscaping and screening. All required landscaping, including landscaping used to meet screening or tree canopy standards, is subject to the general provisions of Chapter 18.420, Landscaping and Screening. 1. The minimum landscape area standard is provided in Table 18.330.1. Landscaping standards are provided in Section 18.420.040.Any landscape area planted to the L-2 standard may count toward meeting the minimum area standard. The applicant proposes to update the site's design by removing and replacing existing on-site landscaping. Staff reviewed the applicant's plans to confirm this proposal will meet the minimum landscape requirement for the I-L Zone (15 percent),with 15 percent or 14,034 square feet of on-site landscaping provided. Additionally, the applicant states that all new landscaping will meet the L-2 landscaping standard (Table 18.420.1).This standard is met. 2. Screening standards are provided in Section 18.420.050. Screening is required as follows: a. Service areas and wall-and roof-mounted utilities must be screened to the S-1 standard. Service areas and utilities are also subject to the standards in Subsection 18.330.040.C. MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 2 The applicant does not propose to modify any existing services areas or utilities, or to add any new service areas or utilities.This standard does not apply. b. Nonresidential development that abuts a nonindustrial zone must be screened to the S- 3 standard along all property lines,except street property lines. The subject property is zoned I-L, and the adjacent property to the west is zoned PR. However, the proposed building additions will be located on the eastern building façade,and will not be visible from the western property line. Accordingly, staff finds that screening is not required for the proposed building additions,and this standard does not apply. c. Surface vehicle parking areas, loading areas, drive aisles, and stacking lanes for drive- through services within 20 feet of a street property line must be screened to the S-4 standard.Screening must be provided directly adjacent to the street property line,except where access is taken. The site contains existing on-site parking located within 20 feet of the street property line (abutting SW Hunziker Road);however,the applicant does not propose to modify any parking in this area.Therefore,this standard does not apply. 3. The minimum tree canopy standards for the site and any off-street vehicle parking areas are provided in Section 18.420.060. Tree canopy standards are addressed in Section 18.420.060 of this decision.This standard is met. E. Pedestrian access. 1. Paths must provide safe and convenient pedestrian access from public sidewalks abutting the site to all required building entrances on the site. A minimum of 1 path is required for every 200 linear feet of street frontage. 2. Paths must provide safe and convenient pedestrian access within the site between all buildings, uses, and areas designed for use by pedestrians. Paths within parking areas or along drive aisles are subject to additional standards in Subsection 18.410.040.B. 3. Paths must extend to the perimeter property line to provide access to existing or planned pedestrian facilities on adjacent properties,such as trails or public access easements,where practicable. The applicant proposes minor additions to the eastern facade of the existing industrial building, which includes adding a new canopy over the building's main entrance,with a ramp,stairs,and pathway directly adjacent to these new additions. The proposed improvements only impact a portion of the overall site. The remainder of the site is legally non-conforming in regards to these pedestrian access standards. Adequate pedestrian access will be provided throughout the proposed improvements, and the remainder of the site will not become further out of conformance with these standards. Additionally, the Building Official will review the applicant's proposal for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) at the time of building permit submittal. These standards are met. 4. Paths must be constructed with a hard surface material and have a minimum unobstructed width of 5 feet. The applicant's plans illustrate that the proposed pathway will be constructed of concrete,and will have an unobstructed width of at least 5 feet.This standard is met. MMD2020-00023 hied Shearer&Sons,Inc. 3 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading 18.410.070 Vehicle Parking Quantity Standards A. Off-street parking requirements. The ratios for providing minimum and maximum vehicle parking spaces are provided in Table 18.410.3. If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than 6 parking spaces for a development with less than 1,000 square feet of floor area,the development is allowed up to 6 parking spaces.If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than 10 vehicle parking spaces for a development between 1,000 and 2,000 square feet,the development is allowed up to 10 vehicle parking spaces. The applicant proposes to reconfigure and restripe the existing on-site parking lot, in order to accommodate the proposed building additions, and one (1) new ADA-accessible parking space. The subject site contains an existing 41,159-square-foot building that is currently occupied by an industrial services use. The applicant's proposed additions will not increase the floor area of the existing building. Industrial services has a minimum off-street parking requirement of 0.8 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of floor area(Table 18.410.3).Accordingly,the total minimum off-street parking requirement for the development site is 33 spaces.Staff reviewed the applicant's site plan to confirm there is adequate parking at the development site,with 42 spaces provided. This standard is met. 18.420 Landscaping and Screening: 18.420.060 Tree Canopy Standards A. Site tree canopy standards,which are stated as a percentage of effective tree canopy cover for an entire site, are provided in UFM Section 10, Part 3, Subparts N and O. Parking lot tree canopy standards are provided below. The applicant is applying for a minor modification to an existing nonresidential development.The applicant proposes to remove all existing trees on the site and in the parking lot, and to plant new trees,all of which are identified on the City of Tigard's Urban Forestry Manual (UFM) Native Tree List. Accordingly, tree canopy standards for the site and for the parking lot apply to this proposal,and are addressed in the findings below. B. An urban forestry plan is required to demonstrate compliance with site and parking lot tree canopy standards and must meet the requirements of UFM Sections 10 through 13. An urban forestry plan must: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a project landscape architect or project arborist, i.e. a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor,except that land partitions may demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; The applicant submitted an urban forestry plan that was coordinated and approved by a certified arborist and tree risk assessor, Todd Prager of Teragan &Associates, Inc. (the project arborist). This standard is met. 2. Demonstrate compliance with UFM tree preservation and removal site plan standards; The applicant submitted a tree removal site plan that meets UFM standards.A tree preservation site plan is not required because the applicant proposes to remove all existing trees on the site and in the parking lot. The project arborist included a signature of approval and statement attesting that the tree removal site plan meets all requirements in UFM Section 10,Part 1.This standard is met. 3. Demonstrate compliance with UFM tree canopy and supplemental report standards MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 4 and provide the minimum effective tree canopy cover; The applicant submitted a tree canopy site plan and supplemental report that meet UFM standards. In addition, the project arborist included a signature of approval and statement attesting that the tree canopy site plan and supplemental report meet all requirements in UFM Section 10,Parts 2 and 3.The subject site is zoned I-L; accordingly, the minimum required effective tree canopy for the overall development site is 25 percent(UFM Section 10,Part 3,Subsection N).Through the supplemental report,the project arborist demonstrates how the effective tree canopy for the entire site is 30 percent.This standard is met. 4. Demonstrate compliance with parking lot tree canopy standards,where applicable, by providing the minimum effective tree canopy cover of 30 percent for all parking areas,including parking spaces and drive aisles.Only the percentage of tree canopy directly above parking areas may count toward meeting this standard; and The existing parking lot only contains 20 percent tree canopy coverage,as detailed in.the project arborist's supplemental report.The applicant proposes to remove all existing parking lot trees,and plant new parking lot trees,all of which are identified on the UFM Native Tree List.The proposed modifications will provide 25 percent parking lot tree canopy coverage.Although this is less than the required 30 percent parking lot tree canopy coverage,staff finds the applicant's proposal will bring the site closer to conformance with this minimum requirement,and is therefore approvable.This standard is met. 5. Include street trees where right-of-way improvements are required by Chapter 18.910,Improvement Standards. a. The minimum number of required street trees is determined by dividing the length in feet of the site's street frontage by 40 feet. When the result is a fraction, the minimum number of street trees is the nearest whole number. More than the minimum number of street trees may be required along the site's frontage depending upon the stature of trees chosen and the specific spacing standards for the chosen trees. The site's total street frontage along SW Hunziker Road is 247.48;therefore,this site is required to provide a minimum of six (6) street trees (247.48 feet divided by 40 feet, rounded to the nearest whole number). The applicant's tree canopy site plan and supplemental report show that 10 street trees will be planted.This standard is met. b. Street trees must be planted within the right-of-way wherever practicable. Street trees may be planted a maximum of 6 feet from the right-of-way when planting within the right-of-way is not practicable as determined by the City Engineer. The applicant's tree canopy site plan shows that all proposed street trees along SW Hunziker Road will be planted on private property,less than six (6) feet from the public right-of-way. This standard is met. 18.510 Sensitive Lands: 18.510.020 Applicability E. Administrative sensitive lands review. 1. Administrative sensitive lands reviews within the special flood hazard area (excluding the floodway), drainageway, slopes that are 25 percent or greater, and unstable ground are processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, for the following actions: a. The repair,reconstruction,or improvement of an existing structure or utility,the cost of MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 5 which is less than 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction. b. Actions within the special flood hazard area: i. The construction of accessory structures up to 528 square feet in size;and ii. Any landform alternation involving up to 50 cubic yards of material. c. Actions within drainageways and slopes that are 25 percent or greater, and unstable ground: i. Minimal ground disturbances or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material; and ii. Building permits for accessory structures that are 120 to 528 square feet in size. 2. The approval authority will approve, approve with conditions, or deny a sensitive land review application using the standards and approval criteria Sections 18.510.040, 18.510.050, 18.510.070 and 18.510.080. City maps indicate that the adjacent property to the west contains a locally significant wetland, stream, and CWS vegetated corridor,and that these sensitive lands extend onto the subject property.The subject site is also located in the FEMA special flood hazard area, but is not located in the floodway. The applicant proposes minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations involving less than 50 cubic yards of material in the vegetated corridor and the special flood hazard area. The scope of work will not impact the locally significant wetland or stream.Accordingly,this proposal requires a sensitive lands review,and is being processed through a Type I procedure. The applicable standards and approval criteria are addressed in the findings below. 18.510.040 General Provisions for Special Flood Hazard Areas A. Review. The approval authority will review all applications to determine whether proposed building sites will minimize the potential for flood damage. B. Special flood hazard. The areas of special flood hazard identified by FEMA in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study for Washington County, Oregon and Incorporated Areas effective October 19, 2018" with accompanying Flood Insurance Map is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. C. Base flood elevation data.When base flood elevation data has not been provided in compliance with Subsection 18.510.040.B, the approval authority will obtain, review and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal, state or other source, in order to administer Subsections 18.510.040.M and N. D. Test of reasonableness.Where elevation data is not available either through the flood insurance study or from another authoritative source,applications for building permits will be reviewed to assure that the potential for flood damage to the proposed construction will be minimized.The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data,high water marks, photographs of past flooding,etc.,where available. Failure to elevate at least 2 feet above grade in these sensitive land areas may result in higher insurance rates. E. Resistant to flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, must be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. F. Minimize flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, must be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. The subject site is located in the FEMA special flood hazard area, but is not located in the floodway. The applicant proposes minor additions to the existing industrial building on site,and minor modifications to on-site parking,landscaping, and trees. MMll2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 6 The FEMA Flood Map shows that the subject site is located in Zone A.According to FEMA's definitions, Zone A represents, "areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event generally determined using approximate methodologies.Because detailed hydraulic analyses have not been performed, no Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) or flood depths are shown." Since base flood elevation data is not available, staff has utilized the test of reasonableness to review the applicant's proposal for potential flood damage. Because the proposed building additions are exterior only (new exterior deck, canopy, and cladding), and will be constructed with durable, weather resistant materials that are intended for exterior use,staff finds that the potential for flood damage to the proposed additions will be minimized. Additionally, the applicant is not proposing to install any new utility equipment.These standards are met. I. Anchoring. All new construction, all manufactured homes and substantial improvements must be anchored to prevent flotation,collapse,or lateral movement of the structure. The applicant states that all proposed building additions will be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement.This standard is met. M. Nonresidential construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other nonresidential structure must either have the lowest floor, including basement,elevated to the level of the base flood elevation,or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities,must: 1. Be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water, Since base flood elevation data is not available for the subject site,staff has utilized the test of reasonableness to review the applicant's proposal, and determined that the potential for flood damage to the proposed additions will be minimized.This standard is met. 2. Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; The applicant states that all proposed building additions will have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads,and effects of buoyancy.This standard is met. 3. Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the design and methods of construction are in compliance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Such certifications must be provided to the building official as provided in Paragraph 18.510.030.E.2;and Compliance with the standard outlined above will be reviewed by the Building Official at the time of building permit submittal.This standard will be met. 4. Nonresidential structures that are elevated,not floodproofed,must meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in Paragraph 18.510.040.L.2.Applicants flood- proofing nonresidential buildings must be notified that flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are 1 foot below the floodproofed level (e.g., a building constructed to the base flood level will be rated as 1 foot below that level). The applicant states that the project contains one(1) foundation area below the lowest floor that is enclosed. MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 7 The applicant also states that the foundation's design meets the standards in Section 18.510.040.L.2 because it will have a minimum of two (2) openings having a total net area of not less than one (1) square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding. Additionally, the applicant states the proposed foundation openings will be no higher than one (1) foot above grade, and that the openings will include screens that will permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters. This standard is met. 18.510.070 Sensitive Lands Applications B. Within the special flood hazard area. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions an application for sensitive lands review within the special flood hazard area when all of the following criteria are met: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title; As demonstrated through the findings in this decision, the applicant's proposal is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this Title.This standard is met. 2. Land form alterations must preserve or enhance the special flood hazard area storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway must not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; a. If in the floodway and no-rise requirement is met,the development will comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions. The subject site is located in the FEMA special flood hazard area, but is not located in the floodway. The applicant proposes minor modifications to on-site parking, landscaping, and trees, which will result in minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations involving less than 50 cubic yards of material.The applicant submitted an analysis of the proposal's expected impact on the base flood level, prepared by registered professional engineer Deborah A.Beck of White Pelican Consulting,LLC(the project engineer). The project engineer determined there will be no change in the base flood level during base flood discharge as a result of the proposed site modifications.This standard is met. 3. Land form alterations or developments within the special flood hazard area are allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community service uses, utilities, or public support facilities are allowed on residentially zoned properties subject to applicable zoning standards; The subject site designated as Light Industrial on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. This standard is met 4. Where a land form alteration or development is allowed to occur within the special flood hazard area it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood; As detailed in the analysis submitted by the applicant,the project engineer determined that the proposed site modifications will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood.This standard is met. D. Within drainageways. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions an application for a sensitive lands review within drainageways when all of the following criteria are met: MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 8 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title; As demonstrated through the findings in this decision, the applicant's proposal is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this Title.This standard is met. 2. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; 3. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation,ground instability,or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; 4. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; The applicant proposes to modify landscaping and plant new trees in the vegetated corridor, adjacent to a locally significant wetland and stream. This proposal will create minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations involving less than 50 cubic yards of material.Staff has reviewed the applicant's materials, and determined that the proposal will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use,will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property, and will not decrease the water flow capacity of the adjacent wetland or stream. These standards are met. 5. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development,the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in compliance with CWS"Design and Construction Standards"; The applicant is not proposing to remove any natural vegetation as part of this proposal.This standard does not apply. 6. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in compliance with Clean Water Services requirements and the city's adopted stormwater master plan; This proposal will not decrease the water flow capacity of the adjacent wetland or stream. This standard does not apply. 7. The necessary U.S.Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board,Division of State Lands,and CWS approvals must be obtained; The applicant obtained a sensitive area pre-screening site assessment from CWS for the proposed work in the vegetated corridor (CWS file no. 20-002143). CWS determined that the project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive areas found near the site.The applicant was not required to obtain approvals from the United States Army Corps of Engineers or the Oregon Department of State Lands for this proposal.This standard is met. S. Where land form alterations or development are allowed within and adjacent to the special flood hazard area,the city will require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the special flood hazard area in compliance with the comprehensive plan. This area will include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian or bicycle pathway within the special flood hazard area in compliance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. The applicant proposes minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations in the vegetated corridor MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 9 and the special flood hazard area. However, dedication of open land area is not required as part of this application. This standard does not apply. 18.765 Modifications: 18.765.060 Minor Modifications A. Definition.A minor modification has the following characteristics: 1. It has minimal impacts on surrounding properties,sensitive lands, or public facilities; and The applicant proposes minor additions to an existing industrial building at 8015 SW Hunziker Road, and minor modifications to on-site parking,landscaping,and trees.As demonstrated in the findings above, the applicant's proposal complies with all applicable development standards for the I-L Zone,as well as the applicable standards for parking,landscaping,tree canopy,and sensitive lands.Accordingly, staff finds this proposal will have minimal impacts on surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities, and meets the definition of a minor modification. 2. It does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard or further out of conformance if already nonconforming, except where an adjustment has been approved. As demonstrated in the findings above, the applicant's proposal complies with all applicable development standards for the I-L Zone, as well as the applicable standards for parking, landscaping, tree canopy, and sensitive lands. Furthermore,this proposal does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard. D. Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a minor modification application when all of the following criteria are met: 1. The proposed modification qualifies as a minor modification as defined in Subsection 18.765.060.A; As demonstrated in the findings above, this proposal qualifies as a minor modification as defined in CDC 18.765.060.A.This criterion is met. 2. If the proposal involves the modification of a condition of approval, at least one of the following criteria is met: a. The condition cannot be implemented for reasons outside the control of the applicant or property owner; b. The condition is no longer needed or warranted because circumstances have changed; or c. A new or modified condition better accomplishes the purpose of the original condition. The applicant is not proposing to modify a condition of approval.This criterion does not apply. CONCLUSION: This proposal qualifies as a minor modification to an existing development, as defined in CDC 18.765.060.A, and is in compliance with all applicable standards of this Title. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was provided to: MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 10 X The applicant and owner Final Decision: This minor modification and sensitive lands review have been processed through a Type I procedure.As such, this decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. This decision is not appealable locally and is the final decision of the City. THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 19, 2020, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 20, 2020 Ouestions: If you have any questions,please contact Lina Smith at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@tigard-or.gov. ----, - ` , August 19,2020 APPROVED BY: Lina Smith,Assistant Planner Community Development Director's Designee MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 11 APPROVED CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE linacs , 14:00:10, 08/19/2020 NMI,max SW On"""° xaTse.scn I . 7- - - = - - - - IL _ (FIUME / ; / il Kvos / / ; I / ' OASKTP e .,�.9mX=e.OROM= AX. I IRE p�k(�/ PEW=ww=V POI TO (9 Mw.9iunro wEuu� -\ -\. f 7— /ir / "tl"�" wn.m.K. ani w'.0 wr. SUBMITTED FOR ccr! 9EMnemsXAa c..v..reiw« r 1 �� - EXnegR{IT=t Kiww. (EI.�.9�M IYMwJM — LAND USE REVIEW- # 1 e,w.raooea, seen a""9E9eK..e. 11 NOT FOR T i il f � -----;/F --_ 6 :aa� CONSTRUCTION / 1 in 9 _ �IM1III I '-.. vim. ____ __ - r� T Ir Ir iI / „r��- + _I_ I 1 FS&S Bldg Renovation o+s w�XkX Street 1 Ii ._ Tigard.OP s'nzs Willi 21 / I eI . ; ; SEE 11,113. fy ,gwwar[roeee.X. fi SITE PLAN ` _'�-��'-"` q fee 9wress re PEW. f EXISTING/DEMO e,..,.w9...aIeK..K A0.01 rom0.X.,> X,.,E.w99a,e Site Plan-Exiadng/Demolition X�Xaftaror22,ne PM aieL,.A I 1'=20' 1 r.T E June 29.2020 ZONING 410109 In PAWNS OM WOO. CHRISTIE E. ...ter TOT,aiOOR.. e�.n•l,B ...ter111.SF ARCHITECTURE 0Cm00*s PU1Y0 PE..Sea.AUS,TOOSxeet 01109', .., KM 511018111 Place 04±010PE. a f,0oo PonIen60P 97219 termsti LOT corset./ ENe erre meet s1•us. e0s7eeaen w0.00 4•T 0SF ••••eE,0.••s•E.u.AwueT•,•s. 1000e0e,00c0KEw0E: a"ii oR"IDEERel wME:o T.Pm00710•'••••3 STALLS .,E•wrvcPrvE nE VAAM.NOTES SEE 91[PUN DRAM.FOP PF.S.Pom P.w,Yw,ar uv0IT ACCES a00.Va0. emu M'e@�CCESWE PAM.9v[••AMRFpKEp."Nees./AO ry T,•N4VVJ11•E 11.TY aF NEW TIM R PAPVJN•J•000 PISTAL 0I WO•F 8.., PM.YJU PuiW061SEE PNWVNO SP•EE wueFv,muC®. C•65 CC00S05 EIE Ue SVEE SPARK PARK•BRES,IO MU WET TIM .,o,K RPTu Ma • vm Ye A /' ``\ urr 1_ _ T __ _ - r r`\1 / ,I , F } 1 ei I I 1 r r - ' .rely�wP - k`' q _— \T.ewFaE .oS I v/ /J ym.em..\ --NN c KW tesseceersta en tEt'rum. �� / �EIP.a.a0T,nTOREwn SUBMITTED FOR ' / /` In1aA9M9LWA TM`NSiO�CWO0$111, 0" �,m O,0E�,.r00,c„xEw LAND USE REVIEW- I` • r_Ii r� _ .cos ertlEwos�.E ao, Iwcum""mu.. I NOT FOR mA59R1E P"� r CONSTRUCTION wi•P....0.0 1/ c // \ ` � ov.PEP.waSAx•. \ 7I__ J. r Ill FS&S Bldg Renovation 1 /^ / . Mt AG PAwK,4 swot----- 7 1 / "' 119.N.IX9]229 nn rcrnETEw,ix ''_—' __-'v � •.wmxcSErzw,ix �Ac.•vwroPaw.. J . 4 1.„,, , \C-t7-5_41 __ . . '�_ v__ __ ________ _ • r 111 J —sal—/ sue- /� i M. ___.w.T ♦.` •' •�-__ , .�-__ SREPLAN- _ — "YE••_- "-- PROPOSED Ifl wm Ta nee. mew„EEAR . A0.02 .oKA,� A, 1 Site Plan•Proposed ®^gx°a•0110. a^=20' I June 29,2020 • • 1. s OOEuviosuPEalo,ea.«oM. a.m..NB6,4 d a CHRISTIE ''"•a' am ARCHITECTURE _ 9532 SW 1.Dace sr Par€aaa.OR 97219 Ts »u 503-T66--66/1 N. aa mu MS ATOM, SF1000. Nia6. ir .110..)1.......1.....A 44Y Mel VIA Y 0€0USTa • Ra 4KY.4N].TfT002F. AEM rantan M9I15 Aar wa. _ rvI / / I 1 / I l .___ --__—__ .71 \' I , ,.. rvi l i VI .- / --�__ I / ,r ' , � ; - Li / ( Ia SUBMITTED FOR *\1 / M M.a ELEcranu TxNSF...*P.. LAND USE REVIEW- tea• .QlfelgMOM.TOMAN. NOT FOR �1 ' CONSTRUCTION / MAS �Il�rr��' °I% rye ' ii .A...o. ■igOM MunnIcar aos vri� 1 — I1 11111 v woec.AT?.M,,.' /!'' \ r • ,/ / 1 501n 006i._ �, 11 I `` J - �fjjJ/ B ` e Ox1E \ I it \11 p' 1 ! 4 y i _ ®pE _ � _ e LANDSCAPING : A0.03 N ttn.6 anal a.raB FwN ! 1"=20' 1Site Plan-Landscaping s®ax0T04:....T 1'=m 5 June 29.2020 xRaxaRroFRRwxa LOT OWEew,aa.MIRACLE FRmwaTREE 4EI„ORT 1 CHRISTIE LAWS. ,m4�R.1,...,,,,,,PE,PEE0.xm..�., ,...,, 00,.,nx w yOVFII MSS E�Tx6 TnaTa RRF4o�Eo X 3EFTs, TMRF x"- xnm rnolua FRi m 14011* s.4w�6Eo. sows,I4* ARCHITECTURE TOE w1.aaaxarr ECU00ORACE MO WETS *4us WM p�0 w4HiYw R1*WE aaa 9539 SW IM%ace sxrvia mEEOPRVIEtoo Rileui OWES s[essv Ert�ERcumoR WAS nuRFxcF MOO =WOWF Pbtlen40H9]219 WO..mee cxgvruu I I e WILLOW Ml7000Mn suT a um iw a ro,a,ava soT wµesmo ewtiaw a bpb1fi666P FABIFIO W6RP nleiieem w aaaaa aaaaa.aaaa aaaaaaa SWETtl W RFEea 4 rasa.Saran TOTNLION1WHO aim arra arlOaWA. swam 010.E M.< . 9Fx91Rh1YNS11E __ 7Fzx7M acM.C•v0VEx #0,7 cave, r alai an BF =WOSE W. a1EQ,4Ejl'. K5 ern urn le ens, maw 99 •7E'r I 4Ew135F ixax SEMNOIOI OFARrtx0LlN.Y81?m wNE .yoga RM'h ex xi sr CWAYaaaaa mate r n Ill SF nave.. 1.a. PT BF MOWS BF,TREE CAW,WYFRFZ REFY\E pt. VW Kt IOW IP. I y FO9 SIT =FLOW LOS n8F MST.WO SOMA SITE nIEA. Fuvu xm aF era %TWO veruer Tom.-- ma rt MOAK .54asn4ElWOSIR. Z ® REYIK WA WV TOTALS. 16411Z 4oxv , r / / 1 / i. I ( r ; — —�l SUBMITTED FOR �/ i `\ LANDUSEREVIEW- , d- -T , NOT FOR i"A — r X \ ❑.._ CONSTRUCTION �y4' [ FSBS BldgRenovation ,‘ II\� F- ,/ 1 ( , / e'j-\\ ``N 1 .a. , , ‘a', \ 6.\\�, B]IS HinnM Shoat X% % 1\ ` Mood,OR 972Y3 1 �P• �/ M1NXN9Em FIG 11 ( iu 'i nX 11 L�III4) 1 ewxOMr yea 1/A' �_'"" 1 L-- I 1 1 1 X 1 a 1 1/ I sRRPxa.wu I ( 1 1 � L _I 1 -'�- I_--S Aa'" l ems- ' a. a. aR _ ----'�- -` i Tree Plan- ,FFF-/-_- m ieE I 0 �ATTEST T0r s, 5 s Ersting r Demolfon E RnmexenswEcI .eRFu c4mI ax�.e6TAYMOWLL- A0.04 WF.-A l um d0.'� M-9—e WSW SHOWN w FOR FALL 1 i"=20' Tree Plan-Existing/Demolition weeTly x>.,R6. 1 i..m !June 29,2020 20,121,11012021 wro�2.2122 a �Lw��a�aa,, 9 �anro�. �, aax 9� amLnEaEEL.w L �m9E=TREE. E wa l..E CHRISTIE ....ox 200E ,I..W�...,�,Lx.0EEE, ,mx.L w,x�,,,10,.0,.1ar.Exl ,E,I, Ml x�n ro." a n,aa0,0EE�w...01. >.x., aEE, COMM COE.% a PIER 09 STAMOMw0rw9TMEEPIOn /Rr.P.wrn1n.walw1,5205.w..02200,2D D PM40N w02000%120,12101E 0wn9102,2 TOWF.OE wv 0,00E cNE9a cwo.E o.Ex ARCHITECTURE A.a T11 N9NEENY sxK 1lo m.n Ion 211,521,5 2 1 11112 5.e1Es�i 2 Es Cleve 2222o w'�mneErtv. •�vmamvEw r�wY .n. Lisvwu w�F uR� 95.12 SW 180 PI11220 arr.�ars tor L1210. ainuE la CVO, 10m SF 0. 2. Pwtlntl,009'R19 2222 m001*005.0/w.EE 202ma a.Nrtxa>NOw., 202u00 mm0Eexecv 22,1221521 90 11NN MEwarewranaaED w w.u2121,2N nDNPPsxr PAETVRNIaam 2,15229 u EEe EU,.R 0000 500xn a ��0tl*�MEn1E r.rwxa tmuw snwun, MIa vfammoay.52512 15,141 E.w M1vc 75069 72 iaw wurv.0.9A4F04E IwNMEwu0Bw0n To LOOSEN wa.ROWE AM LAYERS of 0000 Twzwlxro xxnuu:Lxiwv 201E2101mr12 a2 xaa SF XI CASCANu IOW. a 1121 "Ea • MIEO VPRw1OEONOL00 COMPOST Or E0CE 0N.N60 E✓NF/.'NCR CUYI MEI0IEM Si50 22 d28W IWY ON T,,,,,,0100OR.RE>PNEAOa.2, .,.O n,2 L9T.N¢4w4E 0,2,4 0 P.1NN2..90EwlltsOt CN.a.Na 1wME.wY 00*1*0100022252112141.011ANFI. 2,1120.M^OS.0005Ei205100SOES0...,2Evm.e0Ewa%a0TO L.A.nos.w*WSBv x0paqu1E TIS SOE UPNodT. CIeC.W S a ga./50,01CTEw SOL An T1e OWE Cr THE WLS.of maME R.5 Nal TOWCEAInNE axe E.v1O 509P00*40. mYFR 21212512,CT"NEPMPx.EM2PPE OR q�,90 Z. Jery, 11Y aer uMODE --Eswv NOw TEm0ES CO 40000 MOAT wxu DOOMTILLron DEPTM GROOM TWO,.Opttwa Rana. I.E*. me 1,0111,le-*5200*1Prn0N 0000*. NES afrMwwAETEwawc MlEluNort a+EP THE aw.a LAM uo.m_.umxv.N n"""""u`^"°"rc°"wl as E xxxro2,2122 MU,TO fr9a.0E 10 12122.12 r v On 0v 4tl10E0 cce..mces Fen IEw r1EE$Pao NEnE> NEED Wall. ar VI,.Ox pp>F E>a w6 .,ANrtwrwmm N9.e Owe aamw HSIE.I^EY OVER TIN nlaxroETle c2N�Er a MYA11E VN wv a rev 1 . 0 wu09 .wNU 9'ONCEMa1fPCMTaEro NumwP➢rE.Awa O09011000 wSf 1Ef OR, �wM E E _ X o w r. N MOAN;eNaaaM TWO TO PP0 OH,.02 ma sr 2L _10 µu;y. MTMR Yx �9G MV PTLuw ORMrE 0u1 ]rp wary rex*c CANOPY AREA I I A 201,221112 PM 12, 50 sea sr ma so sr N.TwIe T•a,52,WA2 0 I aftm. aPxw Peu Bee Rsxaxx "ITOOre'20 TNE PPE.WO..waMry ramTamE aa an a aarm oar ie. ESN SiraftsOM OMPvuu MIME CE% F}BTIM9.Mury WTM= sew eF saga/Sr EENHIwE VHwM 11E / AM ____ aMNP1vIlE • ,1 Aj Rw>OaROMM.25,Y 9 �f/, mnm weauE- x I I auNw / I / �-- 1 .tpm t , ,,,,1 4*Wkil I / SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW• i NOT FOR it . , /---- CONSTRUCTION o l-,�I I a e' E31 1 1 _�.__1 I 1 ` FS&S Bldg Renovation p 1 i yy pp� pp� k JIO // U� P\t7 alsaulm,a sneer _ TbErE.OR 97229 10 j 1 tiliummmeem, , it I y� ' Raa + , Illt_____„i yfir . _ e 1 �.� {{ a�YE I '1` T A `�41/6 ��.�� lf 1_—�Y '-' 1 I �TI 1 J if 111 .nw >'a"Iill TDDD,,,„..rrt,TTN.TT,, Y TreePkn- __rwir 02,2E05,0210 arcroN maw rerrtsarr,manual_ g+ —,�'� . Tree Plan-Proposed �2212112222in1:r a 1 =zo 1 .- :June 29.2020 n O O T O • CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 9532 SW MINK. PaI90.OR 97219 5517509919 W.WXP,E aFVI.r.I KB.TIFI.i.CCQ!.b O/. omurtamuucugry / ,R• cumxooWnlel CdCwuaruu. 0...9,09.0099 --- 01____ti MOVEAROW SCVPIMA -\,,, t 1...1EANOPY.I. .0 mu: Z Ix STAIWO GUAR mew I Mqm YMUP,E1 s116,7.:: F -erriror ea l! ssc mxO rnwlH �t e. �= R1 13 --- I \ r b1:9941.,a.n CAW 5.1.040 kv/VA,TOP Pm. W°"a`OxwlmOnc. O.r..w,K+EWE OW, .mWK0lmlm.* em.He smunune.o,a.4. /nuW.m Kmex VID oan*Wa eace :v .,ruv .r. 9eanlaa cc.cn...2100E Building Elevation(East) O O T T O SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FS&S Bldg Renovation Ills Hlll940(SP.N PN,I..CI.1WYniY Nerd.OR9222] F ,,'I.,,rm1 aslant __ __ __ -I I Fre-_- .ems __ .oQan, ®ww w l. to v.eF-4 van 91 dd95a.,,w g Sr COMM'. a °Or.` _Mw°"""^^T ( BUILDING ELEVATIONS r A0.06 2Building Elevation-Canopy(East) 1/8"=1`0" :•-va' I June 29.2020 T 0 O 0 CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 9532 SW 19F Race Paaend On 9R15 sai7ssSsn alw...row oF0 RwFseram uE m.e I.em IwsNEq I1,4 WS WOW. woo,.w o. Nw.lSc.Wor.me w.ve OVER mm..N. Pro wEP.n.Perw Frow<eu MOM rols ElFecelRLnlw 04 avEAin n*u dek\ —— y u o.ln.ao.eEvoNe— wooer `C l m.+�� oF.R..E. 50 41=,0 LL TI ur. .�w.Lee _ 1■� itmvenunw.wro R.EERWE ova.1.w.. III ( rilll■1__ .xwwcowE ___.0,71-40271 l�i �� maRn:: VARIES 4' F. us.W rows w.a,ww wccw.r, co..,cue.m I VANED Ix •Sp.]en a. 65LOW RRi Sal. c. ON GIP PCGwuP .ee. OILIISTLG1.411044,AP FMTIOCCNCFUTv wNL ENXCIX. UIP.YfNCI1dY REYOKeI, 1 Building Elevation(South) 2 Building Elevation(North) SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW• NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FS&S Bldg Renovation lnS..c.e\.Ww aria OEf%aTRNS.JN.runs.was,OW. to RroE*o R.e. an SItunBkeE Street �IEI WAREHOUSE e.So.ro BEYOND ==nn SIRPEA .rv•.iis.. N2e5.OR BI'R3 IMPAPE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ CI cR roxsa,wax,. 171 ❑LL�.� ::! !'! �n �❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ '- a ' A Ian • FIFTWO wµ MitaCOM WALL a 1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A0.07 4Building Elevation(East) 3Bullding Elevation(West) r 0 m . w-.ro i June 29.2020 APPLICANT MATERIALS Case #: MMD2020-00023 111 City of Tigard SLR2020-00002 i 1 �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TIGARD Master Land Use Application LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE O Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) ® Modification: a Type I O Type II ❑ Adjustment 0 Planned Development: O Annexation O Consolidated Plan O Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 0 Concept Plan ❑ Conditional Use 0 Detailed Plan O Downtown Development Review: ® Sensitive Lands Review: O Type I O Type II ® Type I 0 Type II O Type III 0 Adjustment O Site Development Review: 0 Type I O Type II ❑ I-tome Occupation—Type Il 0 Subdivision ❑ Land Partition 0 'Temporary Use Permit 0 Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation 0 Urban Forestry Plan: O Marijuana Facility Permit U Modification O Discretionary Review 0 Miscellaneous: 0 Zoning Map Amendment 11 Type 11 O Type 111 PROJECT INFORMATION Project name: FS&S Building Renovation Brief description of project: . 1. Build 1015 sf of new impervious area that includes an exterior covered ramp and stair and an exterior covered deck.There is no increase to the internal square footage of the building. 2. Remove all trees on site;plant new trees that will improve both the parking tree coverage and the site tree coverage from what is existing. 3. Rearrange the existing parking lot to increase landscaped area and maintain current number of parking spaces. SITE INFORMATION Location (address if available): 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 Tax map and tax lot number(s): Tax ID#:2S101 BD00300 Tax Account#: R458695 Site size: 2.14 acres 93,218.4 SF Zone: IL-light industrial PR-Parks& Recreation APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: Lisa Christie Mailing address: 9532 SW 18th Place City/State: Portland/OR Zip: 97219 Phone: 503-490-5472 Email: lisa@christiearchitecture.com Applicant's representative: Phone: Email: City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of2 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION 0 Same as applicant (Attach list for additional owners) Name: 8015 Hunziker LLC Mailing address: 8015 SW Hunziker Road City/State: Tigard/OR Lip: 97223 Phone: 503-520-9991 Email: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS In addition to this application form,you must submit all required items listed in Subsection 18.710.030.0 of Tigard's Community Development Code. If you are unsure what is required with your application, please contact the planner on duty at 503-718-2421 or tigardplanncronduty@tigard-or.gov. I certify that I am the property owner or I am eligible to initiate this application, as provided in the Tigard Community Development Code. To the best of my knowledge, all the information provided within this application package is complete and accurate. - Lisa Christie 6-8-2020 cant s ' nature Print name Date A„--Lre Ralph Schultz 6-8-2020 Proper ner's s' ure* Print name Date John Park 6-8-2020 Prop owner's signature* Print name Date *The owner most sign this application or submit a separate written authorization when the owner and applicant are different people. Additional Property Owner Information Owners of 8015 Hunziker LLC: John Park 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 503-520-9991 jrn.park@fredshearer.com Ralph Schultz 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 503-520-9991 r.schultz @fredshearer.com STAFF USE ONLY Case No.:MM D2O2O-00023 Application fee: $1,171 Received by: LS Date: 6/11/20 Related Case(s): Determined complete by: LS Date: 7/27/20 City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 9722.3 • www.tigard-or.gor • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of 2 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: JTICOR TITLE'" Washington County,Oregon 2019-074134 Stn=61 N MEJIA 10/1812019 10:20:11 AM 111 SW Columbia St.,Ste 1000 Portland,OR 97201 I,Richard Habernicht,Director of Assessment and Taxation and Ex- GRANTOR'S NAME: Officio County Clerk for Washington County,Oregon,do hereby Performance Contracting Group,Inc.,a Delaware corporation certify that the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in the book of records of said county. GRANTEE'S NAME: Richard Hobemicht,Director of 8015 Hunziker LLC,an Oregon limited liability company Assessment and Taxation,Ex-Officio AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Order No.: 36261905008-CW 8015 Hunziker LLC • 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: 8015 Hunziker LLC 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 APN: R458695 Map: 25118D-00300 8015 SW Hunziker Road,Tigard,OR 97223 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Performance Contracting Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Grantor, conveys and warrants to 8015 Hunziker LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantee, the following described real property, free and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon: A tract of land situated in the W.W.Graham Donation Land Claim No,39,in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian,in the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the W.W.Graham Donation Land Claim No.39;thence South 83°02'20"East,along the Northerly line of said Donation Land Claim,a distance of 952.85 feet to a point on the North line of said Donation Land Claim,South 82°50'East 163.02 feet from the Northwest corner of that tract of land conveyed to John F.Bryant by deed recorded May 19,1905,in Book 69,Page 335, Washington County Deed Records;thence South 08°25'09"West,along the East line of that tract of land conveyed by deed recorded as Document No.80030552,Washington County Deed Records,a distance of 618.76 feet to the true point of beginning of this description;thence South 08°25'09"West,continuing along said East line,a distance of 487.57 feet to the North right of way line of SW Hunziker Road,30.00 feet from centerline;thence North 61°00'53"West,along said right of way line,a distance of 236.28 feet to W a point that is 10.00 feet from,when measured at right angles to,the West line Of that tract of land conveyed by Deed recorded in Document No.80030552,Washington County Deed Records;thence North 12'15'07"East,parallel to said West line,a distance of 383.46 feet;thence South 77°44'53"East a CC distance of 5.00 feet to a point that is 15.00feet from,when measured at right angles to,the West line of v that tract of land conveyed by Deed recorded in Document No.80030552,Washington County Deed Records;thence North 12°15'07"East,parallel to said West line,a distance of 35.00 feet;thence South 77°44'53'East a distance of 188.69 feet to the point of beginning a obi TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress and egress as set forth in that certain Agreement dated b`o September 28,1961,and recorded October 23,1961,in Book 451,Page 492,and also recorded May 15, 1967,in Book 641,Page 649,Washington County Deed Records,over and across the West 30 feet of that property described in Deed recorded January 2, 1986,as Recorder's Fee No.86000497. Subject to: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL,AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES,AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930,AND TO INQUIRE Deed(Statutory Warranty)legal OROlgea.doc/Updated:0426.19 Page 1 OR-TT-FNPT-02743 473650-36264905009 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED (continued) ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS,IF ANY,UNDER ORS 195.300,195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11,CHAPTER 424,OREGON LAWS 2007,SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17,CHAPTER 855,OREGON LAWS 2009,AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7,CHAPTER 8,OREGON LAWS 2010. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have executed this document on the date(s)set forth below. Dated 'k OV� Q-0V J ; if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed by order of its board of directors. Performan Cd tr icti g r , nc.,a Delaware corporation BY: Jason end ck i t State of Kansas County of -JC717.r s cis This instrument was acknowledged before me on(3c-rin.4.,-,L / 7.2019 by Jason Hendricks as President of Performance Contracting Group,Inc.,a Delaware corporation. /i C'i'r{ilc�f:A1 y ublic-State of Kan s ��s�� 2- v:e••Ih DENEEN T.PEDERSON My Commission Expires; ? -1=-Or�8` :>,��IMItal MrAapt.Fxp. 94-/�. Deed(Statutory Womanly)Legal ORD1368.doc/Updated:04.26.19 Page 2 OR-IT-FNPT-02743.473650-36261905008 EXHIBIT"A" Exceptions Subject to: 1. Agreement,including the terms and provisions thereof, Executed by: Owners of the subject properly and adjoining property Recording Date: October 23, 1961 Recording No.: Book 451,Page 492 Also recorded Recording Date: May 15, 1967 Recording No.: Book 641,Page 649 2. Unrecorded sewer easement,as disclosed by Warranty Deed Recording Date: August 24, 1972 Recording No.: Book 884,Page 224 3. Necessary slope easement,as set forth in Document • Recording Date, September 15,1975 Recording No.: Book 1043,Page 971 4. Easement(s)for the purpose(s)shown below and rights incidental thereto,as granted in a document: Granted to: City of Tigard Purpose: Underground sewer line Recording Date: July 29, 1976 • Recording No: Book 1101,Page 30B Affects: Southwesterly corner of subject property Re-Recorded Recording Date: September 9, 1976 Recording No.: Book 1111,Page 384 5. Easement(s)for the purpose(s)shown below and rights incidental thereto,as granted in a document: Granted to: Owner of adjoining property Purpose: Access Recording Date: March 25,1999 Recording No.: 99036045 Deed istatutory Warranty)Legal ORD1368.doc/Updated:04.26.19 Page 3 OR-TT-FNPT.02743.4 73 6 50-36 26190500 3 CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE July 13, 2020 Narrative for Sensitive Lands Review (SLR)&Minor Modification (MMD) Project name Fred Shearer&Sons Exterior Building&Landscape Renovation Site Information Address: 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard, OR 97232 Zone: I-L Overlay: Sensitive Lands Site area: 93,218 sf Submitted Drawings A0.01 Site Plan - Existing/Demolition A0.02 Site Plan - Proposed A0.03 Site Plan - Landscaping A0.04 Tree Plan - Existing/Demolition A0.05 Tree Plan - Proposed A0.06 Building Elevations A0.07 Building Elevations Project Description This project involves an exterior renovation and addition to an existing industrial building. It also includes tree removal,tree planting, and new landscaping.The site is partially in a Sensitive Lands overlay. Renovation work includes: 1. 331 sf addition on the SW side of the building for a new exterior, covered deck. No new interior space. 2. 38 sf addition on the NE side of the building for new cladding. No new interior space. Does not touch the ground. 3. Removal of all trees and planting of new trees.The existing trees are in moderate to poor health and have been poorly pruned. The trees along the east property line conflict with existing underground utilities.The trees do not provide adequate site or parking lot tree canopy coverage. The proposed trees will not conflict with utilities and will greatly improve site and parking lot tree coverage. 4. Re-landscaping all existing and new landscaped areas. Increase to overall landscaped area. 5. Minor modifications to parking lot curbing and re-stripping of parking lot. No change to number of existing parking spaces. 6. No work in the Sensitive Lands overlay. Statement on uses Uses in the building and onsite include: Office: 14,521 sf Warehouse: 23,176 sf Exterior storage: 18,671 sf Exterior storage is for the storage of metal studs as well as a staging area for truck deliveries. 9532 sw 18th place portland oregon 97219 503.490.5472 www.christiearchitecture.com CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE Building coverage, landscaping, hardscaping, impervious area Existing Proposed Delta Existing Building Coverage 34,060 sf 34,060 sf New Building Coverage 369 sf Ramp&Canopy Coverage 686 sf Total Building Coverage 34,060 sf 35,115 sf + 1,055 sf Landscaped Area 13,982 sf 14,034 sf + 52 sf Hardscape/Parking Area 45,253 sf 44,069 sf - 1,184 sf Site Area 93,218 sf 93,218 sf 0 sf Total Impervious Area 79,313 sf 79,184 sf - 129 sf As is evident in the chart above, there is an overall decrease in impervious area and an increase to site landscaping. Response to Chapter 18.510, Sensitive Lands The proposed renovation work on this site is a minimum of 78' from the Sensitive Lands overlay line. There is no impact to the sensitive lands area as a result of this project. There is some proposed tree planting in the sensitive lands area(along Hunziker Street, SW corner of the site). The City of Tigard planners have already given verbal approval for tree planting in this area. 18.510.020.E Applicability Ground disturbance will be limited to 48.6 cubic yards of material and the project will be processed under a Type 1 procedure. (It should be noted that the new deck and ramp are cantilevered, so there is minimal ground disturbance.Also,the new entry walkway is a bridge connecting the ramp and building, so there is no ground disturbance under this area.) 18.510.040.C, Base Flood Elevation Data See attached report"Analysis of Expected Impact on Base Flood Level Due to Proposed Construction" dated July 9, 2020, by White Pelican Consulting. 18.510.040.E, Resistant to Flood Damage Proposed project is entirely exterior(no interior space), constructed with durable, weather resistant materials intended for exterior use. No exterior utility equipment is proposed for this project. 18.510.040.F, Minimize Flood Damage Proposed project is entirely exterior using methods and practices consistent with constructing exterior structures. 18.510.040.1,Anchoring Proposed project is anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure. 9532 sw 18th place porttand oregon 97219 503.490.5472 www.christiearchitecture.com CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 18.510.040.M, Nonresidential Construction 18.510.040.M.1, Proposed project has no spaces below base flood level to waterproof. 18.510.040.M.2, Proposed project has structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. 18.510.040.M.3, Proposed project is certified by a registered professional engineer that the design and methods of construction are in compliance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Se18.510.040.M.4, Proposed project contains one foundation area that is enclosed. Proposed foundation design includes a minimum of 2 openings having a total net area of not less than 1 square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding.The proposed foundation openings are no higher than 1 foot above grade and include screens that allow automatic entry and exit of flood waters. Response to Chapter 18.765. Modifications 18.765.060 Minor Modifications This project qualifies as a`minor modification' because it does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standards or further out of conformance if already unconforming. The project will be processed through a Type I procedure. 9532 sw 18th place portland Oregon 97219 503 490 5472 www.christiearchitecture.com CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE Response to Chapter 18.330. Industrial Zone Development Standards 18.330.040 Development Standards The existing building and all proposed modifications will meet all development standards. Setbacks: Existing building and new additions meet all setback requirements(front 30', 0' at other property lines). Maximum Lot Coverage: 85% Lot size: 93,218 sf 93,218 x .85 Max coverage allowed: 79,235 sf Proposed building coverage: 35,115 sf(includes eaves&covered entries) Minimum Landscaped Area: 15% Lot size: 93,218 sf 93,218x .15 Min landscaped area: 13,983 sf Proposed landscaped area: 14,034 sf(The existing landscaped area is 13,905 sf.) All landscaping will be planted to the L-2 standard. The service areas, transformers, air handling units, etc will not be changed.There are no proposed changes to the screening of these areas. 9532 sw 18th place portland oregon 97219 503.490.5472 www.christiearchitecture.com CHRISTIE ARCHITFCTURE Response to Chapter 18.420. Landscaping and Screening 18.420.030 General Provisions Sixteen (16)existing trees on site are proposed to be removed. Nineteen (19) new trees are proposed to be planted. Site tree canopy coverage will be increased from 18% of site area to 30% of site area.The required minimum coverage for this site is 25%,so this requirement will be met. Parking lot tree canopy coverage will be increased from 20% of site area to 25% of site area.The required minimum coverage for parking lot trees on this site is 30%, so this requirement will not be met. However, the project does not involve reconfiguring the parking lot or significantly redeveloping the site. The project increases the amount of tree coverage for the parking lot over the existing conditions. Additionally, properly sized trees have been chosen for the existing conditions. Smaller trees will be planted under the power lines, preventing future poor pruning. Large trees will take advantage of the area with no power lines.Additionally,the new trees will be planted so as not to conflict with the existing underground utilities. See Arborist's Report for further information. 18.420.040. Landscaping Standards All landscaping will be planted to the L-2 standard. 18.420.050, Screening Standards The service areas, transformers, air handling units, etc will not be changed.There are no proposed changes to the screening of these areas. 18.420.060.Tree Canopy Standards See response under General Provisions above and Arborist's Report. Response to Chapter 18.410.Off-Street Parking &Loading 18.410.040 General Design Standards All spaces will meet the design standards and dimensions as required by this chapter. 18.410.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards There are currently no bicycle parking spaces on site. Four spaces are required per Table 18.410.3. Four spaces will be provided and will meet the design standards as required by this chapter. 18.410.070 Vehicle Parking Quantity Standards Off-street parking and loading will not be significantly impacted by this proposal.There are currently 42 parking spaces on site. 33 spaces are required by code.The parking lot will be re-striped and 42 spaces will be maintained. 9532 sw 18th ptace porttand Oregon 97219 503.490.5472 www.christiearchitecture.com T, ',i :�u, Consulting,White Pelican LLC 4. Pcli� - Environmental Engineering& Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified#12223 JULY 9, 2020 8015 SW HUNZIKER RD Analysis of Expected Impact on Base Flood Level Due to Proposed Construction PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY. Christie Architecture White Pelican Consulting, LLC 9532 SW 18`h Place Deborah Beck P.E. Portland, OR 97219 PO BOX #33946 (503) 490-5472 Portland, OR 97292 (503) 847-9455 t'0 PROres, 44 1 0 'rEPr 11,201 s - �� 3 RA H A•6 EXPIRES: /1/3//z/ dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com White Pelican Consulting, LLC Pelican Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Project Summary Site improvements at 8015 SW Hunziker Rd Tigard,OR 97232 (site) have been proposed to be added to to the existing industrial building located at site.The improvements include an exterior renovation, addition of a covered deck,addition of a covered access ramp and stairs,and re-landscaping of the site. The site is located inside a FEMA defined 100 year flood zone and falls under the requirements of City of Tigard Code Sections 18.510.070.6.2 and 4 that specify that the base flood level cannot be raised as a result of proposed construction. This report examines the two approaches expected to cause the most impact on the base flood level. The first approach looked at the additional stormwater that would be added to flood waters during a 100-year rain event and the second approach looked at displacement of volume of flood waters and possible rise of the base flood level resulting from the volume of space occupied by the new construction. Summary of Proposed Changes of Impervious Area on the site A list of proposed changes of impervious areas on the site is below and the areas in square footage of each change is listed in Table 1. • 331 sq.ft. addition on the SW side of the building for a new exterior, covered deck. Of this, 210 sq.ft of the addition is the footing. • 38 sq.ft. addition on the NE side of the building for new cladding. Cladding starts 18inch above ground. • 686 sq.ft. addition on the S side of the building for a new ramp and stairs with canopy coverage. Only 252 sf of this section is the ramp and stairs. • Re-landscaping all existing and new landscaped areas. Increase to overall landscaped area. • Minor modifications to parking lot curbing and re-stripping of parking lot. No change to number of existing parking spaces. Table 1:Building coverage, landscaping, hardscaping, impervious area in sq.ft. Existing Proposed Delta Existing Building Coverage 34,060 34,060 New Building Coverage 369 Ramp&Canopy Coverage 686 Total Building Coverage 34,060 35,115 +1055 Landscaped Area 13,982 14,034 +52 Hardscape/Parking Area 45,253 44,069 -1184 Site Area 93,218 93,218 - Total Impervious Area 79,313 79,184 -129 dbeck@whitepelicanconsultine.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 1 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 "'elican1 White Pelican Consulting LLC P Consulting Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Site Location within FEMA Base Flood Map The site is located inside a FEMA defined 100 year flood zone. Figure 1 shows the location of the site and the boundaries of the base flood level [1]. FEMA defines the flood hazard areas shown on the FEMA flood maps as Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). SFHAs are defined as the area that will be inundated by the flood event having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year.The 1- percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or 100-year flood. The site is located in SFHA zone A as shown in Figure 2.The section of Zone A that the site is located in is connected to another zone A to the north by a culvert under Hwy 217,and connected to the flood zones around Fanno Creek to the south after going under the railroad.The sections of the base flood to the north of Hwy 217 and the south of the railroad were not included in the calculations. However, as the flood y zozonee`saare connected,an even lower impact would be expected on the flood waters. c l r : hip ti } r J K ilk, Bryn r • • n S � r ` ` `> ' 1.it t • y ;.ti.r` ♦ r T � •a , 8015 SW - 'II . ' .+ rr1l '\' ',. ' �' i `7ia .�: Hunz'kerRd Y � - `l .o- F y�. ell. 7 a tr• j O :/� y`rtYr 4 ' .. x)) .,' jilt. a;r fir• Ili 5' fJyg WWI . . ' `• ` r y}'.'4.Y �`•a2 ... - t. AO ` `.. :. = , ' ' MOO * •- - :r.,-, #k!'w.lc ' - Ii. 4 i a x 1 dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 2 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 `P''ch`""c White Pelican Consulting, LLC an Aii. uuSulling Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Figure 1:Location of 8015 SW Hunziker Rd in relation to the FEMA 100 year flood.See Appendix A for full FEMA FIRM i *ige r «16 —4 ' f [• / , .L. pz » . 4 ♦ W .0 rt Figure 2:Close-up of site in the FEMA 100 year flood zone impact of storm water runoff from changed impervious area The site was analyzed for potential impact on the height of the base flood level resulting from stormwater runoff from new impervious surfaces during a 100-year flood.The largest volume of stormwater runoff added to flood waters would be expected to occur during a 100-year rain event. Therefore, impact from stormwater runoff was determined using the 100 year, 24-Hour Rainfall Depth of 4.50 inches(Per Clean Water Services Drawing No. 1280). Design hydrology for on-site stormwater runoff from the impervious surfaces on the site both for pre and post-development were calculated using HydroCAD 10.10 modeling software and the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) Method. The HydroCAD® Modeling Output for the 100-year storm is shown in Appendix A.The surface area of the surrounding flood waters as measured on the FEMA map was determined to be —1,788,683 sq. Ft (See Figure 3). The formula used to determine the final expected change of base flood level is shown in Equation 1. dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 3 PO BOX#33946 Portland,OR 97292 `°''�elic"tan White Pelican Consulting, LLC C.,,.uit,nr __ ' Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 e 4 c c n o a ■ tt •G.....rv:.•/alto+,.r.e-t :r< 0 t.,.nwc.(,s., ♦u.;..,. L. . p.,rr:n.,l I i. xl I,,n,d ;ryor(Nf II)Vr.w.•, _rr,..a^,'r.,n.••�..r. mvs m M[We lid,00.a x!0. ♦ IP.' VC -- yy"rm}i'C v .'{*J i I v, f.iT • ' ' 4 ' r • w F i is . 1.788.68®Sq Feet L. ;: • Y. t y- i " 0+taryv ^ aY4 ^r S1ri 9i, r7.-r `� 1i . set r o•�' J. I \• ' I r i I.,..; !!! a it((GI—r•r II yy /. ,r f It* ;: -0- Figure 3:Surface Area of Zone A immediately surrounding the site Equation 1:Change of Base Flood Level from Storm water Runoff A Flood level(inch) = A 100 year Runoff ft3) * 12 inch Surface Area of FEMA Flood Zone (f tz) foot Table 1:Impact on Flood Level from Storm water Runoff Parameter Amount Unit Existing Lot Conditions 100 yr. Runoff 24,989 cu.ft Proposed Lot Conditions 100 yr. Runoff 24,962 cu.ft Difference -27 cu.ft Surface Area of FEMA Flood Zone -1,788,683 sq.ft Impact on Flood level -0.0002 inch The flood level is expected to decrease from the proposed changes in impervious area,although 0.0002 inches or 1/5000 inch is an immeasurable amount for all practical purposes. No change in the base flood level during base flood discharge is expected from stormwater runoff as a result of changes in impervious area being proposed at the site, nor will there be an increase of the surface level of the 100- year flood. dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 4 PO BOX#33946 Portland,OR 97292 `X'eli'71Secan Consulting,White Pelican LLC 4„. Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Impact of displaced volume from proposed new construction A volume check calculation was performed to determine if the new added building volume would increase the base flood elevation. Base flood elevations noted in the adjoining Zone AE around Fanno Creek appear to be roughly 7 feet above ground level as determined from the ground level 2' contours shown in Tigard Maps [2] and comparing to the base flood elevations noted in the FEMA FIRM (Appendix B). Using the proposed additional 500 sq.ft. of added footing to the building for the deck (210 sq.ft.), ramp and stairs (252 sq.ft.), and cladding (38 sq.ft.) an approximation of displaced water volume was determined for up to 3 feet height. After 3 feet flood waters would be over the deck, ramp, and stairs, and would no longer be subject to volume displacement from the proposed construction.As the cladding will be installed at a height of 18" off the ground volume displacement was determined from 1- 18" of flood height, and then 1-36"of flood height. Table 3:Impact on Base Flood Level from Displaced Volume Resulting from Proposed Construction Parameter Amount Unit Area of site 93,218 sq.ft. Area of existing building 34,060 sq.ft. Area of building plus new additions 0-18" 34,522 sq.ft. Area of building plus new additions 18-36" 34,560 sq.ft. 1-18"water rise,existing site flood volume 88,737 cu.ft 1-18"water rise,proposed site flood volume 88,044 cu.ft 1-18"water rise Displaced volume of water 693 cu.ft 1-36"water rise,existing site flood volume 177,474 cu.ft 1-36"water rise,proposed site flood volume 176,031 cu.ft 1-36" Displaced volume of water 1,443 cu.ft Surface Area of FEMA Flood Zone 1,788,683 sq.ft. 1-18"Estimated Impact on base flood height 0.005 inch 18-36"Estimated Impact on base flood height 0.010 inch The volume of displaced water from the new additions was determined to be a maximum of"'1,443 cu. ft and when spread across the section of Zone A located between Hwy 217 and the railroad, resulted in insignificant rise of 0.010 inches or 1/100tb of an inch. For perspective,the minimum size a droplet of water must be in order to be heavy enough to fall and be considered a raindrop is 1/50th or 0.02 inches [3]. Because the base flood surface level is connected to the section of zone A north of the Hwy 217, and to Fanno Creek in the south,the calculated rise of 0.005-0.01 inch would be much less.The proposed building additions will have no measurable impact on the base flood level. No change in the base flood level during base flood discharge is expected from volume displacement as a result of the proposed additions to the building, nor will there be an increase of the surface level of the 100-year flood. dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 5 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 White Pelican Consulting, LLC Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 References 1. FEMA Base Flood Maps https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home 2. Tigard Maps Online https://maps.tiga rd-or.gov/Htm l5Viewer/Index.html?viewer=PublicAdva nced 3. USGS Raindrops are different sizes https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/science/raindrops-are- different-sizes?qt-science center objects=0#qt-science center objects dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsultingcom 6 PO BOX#33946 Portland,OR 97292 White Pelican Consulting, LLC t — - Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Appendix A: HYDROCAD® MODELING OUTPUT dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 7 PO BOX#33946 Portland,OR 97292 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SBUH method, Split Pervious/lmperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff Area=93,295 sf 85.01% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.21" Tc=5.0 min CN=82/98 Runoff=2.14 cfs 24,989 cf Subcatchment 2S: Proposed Runoff Area=93,218 sf 84.94% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.21" Tc=5.0 min CN=82/98 Runoff=2.13 cfs 24,962 cf 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 2.14 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 24,989 cf, Depth> 3.21" Runoff by SBUH method, Split Pervious/lmperv., Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 34,060 98 Building " 45,253 98 Parking/Hardscape 13,982 82 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG D 93,295 96 Weighted Average 13,982 82 14.99% Pervious Area 79,313 98 85.01% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Existing Hydrograph 7 ®Runoff 12.14 cfs 2- Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Runoff Area=93,295 sf Runoff Volume=24,989 cf Runoff Depth>3.21" Tc=5.0 min u. CN=82/98 1 jI o 5 6 7 8 9 —10 11 12 131415181718 19 20 Time (hours) 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Proposed Runoff = 2.13 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 24,962 cf, Depth> 3.21" Runoff by SBUH method, Split Pervious/lmperv., Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 35,115 98 Building 44,069 98 Parking/Hardscape 14,034 82 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG D 93,218 96 Weighted Average 14,034 82 15.06% Pervious Area 79,184 98 84.94% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: Proposed Hydrograph 10 Runoff 12.13 cls Type IA 24-hr 2 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Runoff Area=93,218 sf Runoff Volume=24,962 cf Runoff Depth>3.21" LL Tc=5.0 min CN=82/98 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Multi-Event Tables Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Events for Subcatchment IS: Existing Event Rainfall Runoff Volume Depth (inches) (cfs) (cubic-feet) (inches) 100 year 4.50 2.14 24,989 3.21 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Multi-Event Tables Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Events for Subcatchment 2S: Proposed Event Rainfall Runoff Volume Depth (inches) (cfs) (cubic-feet) (inches) 100 year 4.50 2.13 24,962 3.21 `Y"i`` White Pelican Consulting LLC AtoPelican � Environmental Engineering& Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 APPENDIX B: FEMA FIRM dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 13 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 4. , t. , 00, W9 I� F 1! g 9 r MIL 4. I I ,, i ♦ , 'v 4 v '. ..\ Ir, f��1� t q ii CjI: (�* �I �ail� Itt/ 'r `q_ , 7 I {�•:. ��*E�,H•a?;, k .�•� ti ,I • .;,y� -�' }� 1 ._ 1 _ r y�7 ,� 11 t t b 1iti 11;r it SE o x v-,., : }y� 1. yip y .mt.J • 1' t r .1 ✓ J '^t. • y`, t E 1 i li �� p{ !i z sly( Il1P xpPe� � � t g"'. ' 44.1..17J '� • _q_v •4 �r t: 14. •01N. /i ', 1, ��' •t 1' ti, Mt I w „ r N 1 ✓. 4 3.: 1.I 3 1 P t I 1 PA i'° x1 t pL11h1 f" ...fr,41 rp gi.,.wt 1t, �! ?? t Y Y 1 ; :,a ., yet; s1 4e`5 . i +' i- - t' 7. r .4'1C -` i•PP Ii1J [ . Wit 'Ps •l . r 'li! lit! ' i!j1I a ' '.1 '' 11 . ., ' '1 .. /II 11 t+ lE ?iI 1E �"' •r or IA 1 f _ '; ' ; - +'S 1Y t � 1• 1l1l E! Ii i It 1l'i�l ` j 1} 5 y f� Y�:' �� y; l:o t P 1' ''((I!} 14l s} ; tl ►TI ,M. -« -;•-.I f ,..,., I. „=�, ` I g '�` y a ,r • �; ,,, ,• F _ 1i�1 I(r14 t 11 Ii Ohl' '� +. 1 , ,A • • t ...I or _, ,. 1 G - t 1 "' 1111 lil i 11 r4 xpF7/i4 .1{}• '^ • .- = I 1, t{ I i S I I �/ tl 1' F •-mmil e. "it '.. �i rl Mf • Ir NI lis T 1. It f •4u r �t s i�'.. i �r l� t ft• /� 4� ' ' ' j v � � i • f 1 III .111 f 1 1 rl dial N�= + ' rN ,T t+t.i �_. i l I-, a W.' GP try • r, t III ;It 1 Ep t� 5 ►. . a {` 1 (': t w ,WT 1w �'Y ••+RTLL till . ..... f••�' I. ♦ �f ,�i ✓• , Irl ,,nl el , AE Ili lif y • qq il .1 Ji i�A a.1 $ ; 9,o- FEMA ...0 , ' i,,; „ "-' , j' I , 4. - National Flood Insurance Program `p n I, • a' yi I 1 - 1, ' . • ��r ;f 1 « " 4 ' a off, v 11_ Wr,'- I ♦. , • . 4' ... t. G K �„ 1= i t r m „ � P I +M r Y i• Y E •'�' i IS - .✓ _�- L` !at VIl' i"1I •� .. .,I' . c � ter,_ — I•. �;. `T"rt i*'y.Gx 1. �ti 1 .� �_ g , ERAGAN ,) 6 ASSOCIATES , INC . ARBORICULTURAL CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 9,2020 TO: Lisa Christie (Christie Architecture) FROM: Todd Prager,AICP, RCA#597, ISA Board Certified Master Arborist RE: Supplemental Arborist Report for 8015 SW Hunziker Street Summary This is the Supplemental Arborist Report for the proposed FS&S Building Renovation project at 8015 SW Hunziker Street as required by Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Section 10.3 of the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. Thirty(30)percent effective canopy will be provided through the planting of native trees. The required minimum effective canopy for the site is 25 percent,therefore the proposal exceeds the minimum requirement. The proposed parking lot tree canopy coverage will increase from 20 percent, up to 25 percent. Therefore,the project moves towards compliance with the parking lot tree canopy cover standard of 30 percent. Background FS&S is remodeling their building at 8015 SW Hunziker Street in Tigard. The City of Tigard has determined that the Tree Canopy requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code apply to the project. The assignment requested of our firm for this project was to: • Prepare a Supplemental Arborist Report for the proposed development as required by Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 10.3; • Provide recommendations for meeting with the street tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 12; • Provide recommendations for moving the project towards compliance with the parking lot tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 13; and Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle •Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 2 of 13 • Coordinate,provide recommendations, and a signature of approval for the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan prepared by Christie Architecture as required by Chapter 18.420 and Urban Forestry Manual Sections 10.1 and 10.2. Supplemental Arborist Report The Supplemental Arborist Report requirements in Section 10.3 of the Urban Forestry Manual consist of three main parts: 1) an inventory of existing trees and tree removal/protection recommendations; 2) an inventory of trees to be planted and planting recommendations; and 3)a determination of whether the canopy requirements for the development have been met and/or recommendations for meeting the canopy requirements. This section of the report addresses these three components. Inventory of Existing Trees and Tree Protection/Removal Recommendations This section of the report addresses the inventory of existing trees and tree protection/removal recommendations. Inventory: On May 18, 2020 I completed the inventory of existing trees at the project site. The complete inventory data for each tree is provided in Attachment 1 and includes the tree number, common name, scientific name,trunk diameter(DBH), crown radius, crown area(canopy),whether the tree is open or stand grown,whether the tree is a heritage tree,condition rating, suitability for preservation rating,pertinent comments, and whether the tree will be removed or retained. The tree numbers in the inventory in Attachment 1 correspond to the tree numbers on the Tree Preservation and Removal Plan in Attachment 2. Tree Removal and Retention: As part of the remodel project,the owner is proposing to removal all of the existing(non-native)trees at the site and replace them with native trees. Tree Protection: Tree protection is not applicable since all of the existing trees are proposed for removal. Inventory of Trees to be Planted and Tree Planting Recommendations This section of the report addresses the inventory of trees to be planted and tree planting recommendations. Inventory: The complete inventory data for each tree to be planted is provided in Attachment 3 and includes the tree number, common name, scientific name, caliper or height, mature crown(canopy) spread, mature crown (canopy) area, available soil volume, and pertinent comments. The tree numbers in Attachment 3 correspond to the tree numbers on the Tree Canopy Plan in Attachment 4. Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com •Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 3 of 13 Tree Planting Recommendations:New trees that are planted to meet the effective canopy requirements shall conform to the applicable standards in the City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. They shall be planted in accordance with the American National Standards Institute(ANSI) standards for tree planting(A300, Part 6)and additional standards adopted by the Oregon Landscape Contractors Board (OLCB). Nursery stock shall meet the requirements of the American Association of Nurserymen (AAN) for nursery stock(ANSI Z60.1)for Grade No.1 or better. Double stake trees only if needed for stability. The site soils consist of Aloha silt loam and Verboot silty clay loam, and are considered adequate for tree planting, growth, and vitality if provided proper drainage.Note that this area is highly disturbed so there is likely significant past importing and exporting of soils as is typical in urban areas. To prepare areas for new planting,backhoe turning should be used to loosen soil. Remove any layers of good topsoil and temporarily stockpile. Spread 3-to 4-inches of organic (high-lignin)compost or ESCS (Expanded shale/Calcine Clay) amendment over the area prior to turning the soil. Maintaining a safe distance(angle of repose) from paving, sidewalks, structures, and utilities, use a backhoe to turn soil to 36-inch depth. Break soil into large peds and loosely incorporate the soil amendment. Maintain a slope of compacted soil at the edge of the paving(angle of repose) so as not to undermine the paving sub-base. Hand turning may be necessary along the edges of paving and at walls. Do not till to a depth greater than the bottom of footing. After turning, re-spread topsoil and add 3- 5-inches of yard waste organic amendment over the surface and lightly till to break the soil into texture suitable to fine grade. Strategies to provide sufficient soil volume for newly planted trees have been implemented. All trees to be planted at the site have been provided over 1,000 cubic feet of soil volume. Canopy Requirements The proposed development is within the I-L zoning district which requires 25 percent effective canopy. The area of the subject site is 93,218 square feet. The mature canopy of planted native trees (22,577 square feet) is eligible for 125 percent credit. The total effective canopy provided is 28,221 square feet which represents 30 percent of the site area. Therefore,the minimum effective canopy requirement for the site (25 percent) is met. A summary of the effective canopy provided by the proposed development is provided in Attachment 5. Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com •Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 4 of 13 Street Tree and Parking Lot Tree Requirements This section of the report provides recommendations for meeting the street tree and parking lot tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Sections 12 and 13. Street Tree Requirements Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code requires one street tree for each 40 feet of street frontage. When the result is a fraction,the required number of street trees is rounded to the nearest whole number. Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual requires street trees to be provided minimum soil volumes based on the width of the right of way. The right of way frontage at the site is approximately 236 feet. Therefore, at least six street trees are required. As shown in the proposed Tree Canopy Plan in Attachment 4,ten medium stature street trees planted 24 feet on center will be provided. As shown in the inventory of trees to be planted in Attachment 3,all street trees will be provided over 1,000 cubic feet of soil volume so the street tree soil volume requirements will be met. Parking Lot Tree Requirements Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code requires parking lot tree canopy to cover at least 30 percent of a parking lot area. Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual requires parking lot trees to be provided at least 1,000 cubic feet of soil volume. For this renovation project,the City of Tigard is requiring the applicant to move closer towards compliance with the parking lot tree canopy requirements in Chapter 18.420. As shown in Attachments 2 and 4,the parking lot canopy coverage will move towards compliance with the 30 percent canopy coverage requirement as follows: Existing Parking lot square footage: 25,278 square feet Parking lot canopy square footage: 5,016 square feet Parking lot percent canopy coverage: 20 percent Proposed Parking lot area square footage: 24,203 square feet Parking lot canopy square footage (from nine new trees): 5,995 square feet Parking lot percent canopy coverage: 25 percent As shown in the inventory of trees to be planted in Attachment 3, all parking lot trees will be provided over 1,000 cubic feet of soil volume so the parking lot tree soil volume requirements will be met. Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com •Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9.2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 5 of 13 Tree Plan Recommendations This section of the report includes a review of the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan prepared by Christie Architecture. Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment 2 substantively includes the required information for a Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan listed in Section 10.1 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Tree Canopy Site Plan Attachment 4 substantively includes the required information for a Tree Canopy Site Plan listed in Section 10.2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. It will be important to ensure the construction documents include the planting preparation notes from the project arborist so that the contractors understand how to implement the plan. Note that root barriers are also required when trees are within five feet of paved areas. Also,keep in mind that parking lot and other site lighting,utility vaults,and other site improvements should not be placed in the planting beds if it will conflict with the tree planting requirements. Conclusion Thirty(30)percent effective canopy will be provided through the planting of new native trees. The required minimum effective canopy for the site is 25 percent, therefore the proposal exceeds the minimum requirement. The proposed parking lot tree canopy coverage will increase from 20 percent, up to 25 percent. Therefore, the project moves towards compliance with the parking lot tree canopy cover standard of 30 percent. The information in this report also demonstrates that the street tree and parking lot tree planting requirements will be met. Please contact me if you have questions, concerns, or need any additional information. Sincerely, Todd Prager ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#597 ISA Board Certified Master Arborist, WE-6723B ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor AICP,American Planning Association Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle •Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com •Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 6 of 13 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Inventory of Existing Trees Attachment 2- Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment 3 - Inventory of Planted Trees Attachment 4- Tree Canopy Plan Attachment 5 - Summary of Effective Canopy Attachment 6- Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.corn•Website:teragan.com 4'5-' I ERAGAN July Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker � 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture c✓' - Page 7 of 13 cr .) 0 ASSOCIATES, INC. t-IJ ARnORICUI"I UNAI.CONSULTANTS Attachment 1 Existing Tree Inventory Tree No. Common Name Scientific Name DBH1 C-Radz Canopy3 0/S4 HT5 Cond5 Pres7 Comments Treatment 1 sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua 18 18 1018 0 N 3 3 street tree,side pruned for overhead remove high voltage lines 2 sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua 12 15 707 0 N 3 3 street tree,side pruned for overhead remove high voltage lines street tree,side pruned for overhead 3 sweetgum Liquidambarstyraciflua 14 14 616 0 N 3 3 remove high voltage lines 4 sweetgum Liquidambarstyraciflua 16 24 1810 0 N 3 3 street tree,side pruned for overhead remove high voltage lines 5 sweetgum Liquidambarstyraciflua 17 23 1662 0 N 2 2 street tree,side pruned for overhead remove high voltage lines 6 apple Ma/us sp. 8 12 452 0 N 1 1 low vigor,significant decay remove 7 apple Malus sp. 4 8 201 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove multiple leaders at ground level,low 8 apple Malussp. 4,4,3,3,3,2,2 14 616 0 N 1 1 remove vigor 9 apple MMus sp. 4 7 154 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 10 apple Malus sp. 7 11 380 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 11 apple Molus sp. 8 14 616 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 12 apple Malus sp. 5 10 314 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove Teragan Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835•Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker 4\T sT, Page 8 of 13 E R A G A N July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture » ? C7 ASSOCIATES, INC. /t..r•f ANDORICULTURAL CONSULTANTS Attachment 1 Existing Tree Inventory Tree No. Common Name Scientific Name DBH3 C-Rad2 Canopy3 0/S4 HT5 Cond5 Pres' Comments Treatment 13 purpleleaf plum Prunus cerasifera 15 12 452 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 14 red oak Quercus rubra 21 31 3019 0 N 2 2 high crown from pruning,moderately remove one sided high crown from pruning,moderately 15 pin oak Quercus palustris 15 27 2290 0 N 2 2 remove one sided 16 pin oak Quercus palustris 25 29 2642 0 N 2 2 moderately one sided remove LDBH is tree diameter measured at 4.5-feet above ground level,in inches.Trees with multiple stems at or near ground level are converted to a single DBH shown according to the requirements in the City of Tigard code. 2C-Rad is the average crown radius measured in feet. 3Canopy is the average tree canopy area(In square feet)calculated as follows:Canopy=(Average Tree Canopy Spread/2)2 x It. 40/SG identifies the trees as either Open Grown or Stand Grown the average crown radius measured in feet. 5HT identifies whether or not the tree is a Heritage Tree(either Y for yes or N for no). 6Cond is the numerical condition rating(0-3)as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING VIGOR CANOPY DENSITY DEADWOOD FAILURE HISTORY PESTS DECAY 0 dead to severe decline <30% major scaffold branches >1 scaffold Infested major conks and cavities 1 declining 30-60% twig and branch dieback scaffold branches Infested one to a few conks;small cavities 2 average 60-90% small twigs small branches Minor present only at pruning wounds 3 good to excellent 90-100% little or none none None absent to present only at pruning wounds 7Pres is the numerical suitability for preservation rating(0-3)as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING CONSIDERATIONS The tree is a"hazard tree"as defined in chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code and"hazard tree abatement"as defined in Chapter 18.120 in the Tigard Development Code cannot be completed in a manner that results in 0 tree retention consistent with tree care industry standards. 1 The tree is dead,in severe decline,or declining but may still be retained if desirable for wildlife or other benefits because it is not considered a"hazard tree"or"hazard tree abatement"could be performed. 2 The tree has average health and/or structural stability that could be alleviated with treatment;the tree will be less resilient to development impacts and will require more frequent management and monitoring after development than a tree rated as a"3". 3 The tree has good to excellent health and structural stability;the tree will be more resilient to development impacts,and will require less frequent management and monitoring after development than a tree rated as a"2". Teragan Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835•Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com M41WEa PHMM]LOT'FEE Gem,WYYEAME 10..m0,aff CHRISTIE IE<.IH -� ..a.P rarer,Tar 10 se REMOVE, X TOTAL 11T1RE °'M00Y'"`•. E.m.+s4 me. WYE a n41a .w +wl14.r ...R10140 Ear eMwoler ARCHITECTURE weiawxoim WEw 1P0 aPE.MeiMES1 I OVER seem, .T s nrym 9632 SW 11 Place urmaTae e9Mx1s I1WHalnllO.VVEasoEmlmamoAwnosw4.cEenxro. snverout wee REIX% Pater*OR97219 wn,,,„„„ceaev,,, I �ETuws.wr16 e4T LATE°TO.1Mxe4 wTiaWlro.MD ee.4.... 4EIC42 srcy2sss9n re...were --.— TW MEMeETwEamE rMap wTxnsloEwluc e.M./ IC 21 IMO Si re, ose111tle.1.enw1.su. a wa rese0 semen, ------ TMH a1He0Moemw0E1,T41EErworAREA a0.E97 sysEmw 41EI.mF 1cHnnxlFxePm5555 e.HM4 Eon "Mxe es BF1 re Ee41ElTM _ • ^ 41MaMm.. E.x ¢ �;n ng Attachment 2 509195,E mM TOEI1El1MMVY.i2rug1u2144Eu5WE 5,59 MFl! • r Ise sr 5156•557 RGWKMI E1F ern.are rear 4MTFV000MH4e 1. REWK 70119 E1114110611E MGR 4541040 41014010E 577.77 'TWF.W599921 MYT000105:E. TR 1 OVA a MHO: 11MEE 41E74K m warIn e1/957.75017171799505999. T . / ` . / ' 9PR41a15 --------------- / ; I / ' .i - I I .- - / -- — � SUBMITTED FOR i� 1 \\ LAND USE REVIEW- i /-I �'� 1\ I NOT FOR IY% X — -- pI IA hI� CONSTRUCTION \ %l T�,y'� >� \�T FS858M Renovation ., p /,\ / /% \ \1 I p\ BOIS Hulrsiker Street I it / —11 — ' I , ; r1 \\ 1 I rgME.00 W22i x ,amr.a47:''' I 1,EX I�1W ' I e msH SF I . 1 x�1 , -1 )i 1 ram ly" —�.,, I .�1 . x I • _� mac — • — ` em,_ — i TrsePlan- --�� 10011M 0 SITE14ST euml« *err Existing I Demolition t w ws. -A .04 IIXO MMER. MBGR0T ® 9 O ax..41aHM ma:a'° M=20' 1 T Pan-Exisgng/Denwltion s®Mla,l:Pvsl-la e I Jule 29,2020 Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker r July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture y T E R A G A N Page 10 of 13 5 .3 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. ARRORICULTURALCONSULTANIS Attachment 3 Planted Tree Inventory Tree Lot Mature Canopy Mature Canopy Available Soil Volume No. No. Common Name Scientific Name Caliper or Height Spread(ft) Area(sq.ft.) (cu.ft.of soil) Comments 17 n/a cascara I Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 18 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 19 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 I 1000+ street tree 20 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ t street tree 21 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 22 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 23 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 24 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ 1 street tree 25 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 26 n/a cascara Rhamnuspurshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 27 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 28 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 29 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 30 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ 1 parking lot tree 31 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 32 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 33 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 34 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 35 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 22577 9 .PREPM.TMIWRB PEW0RE•m,..a...FYE09TME TDPC9.PA3.401.0RTP18uRDPVE0.E1.4E MREEC.EPTMAE CHRISTIE T4T ME%,uv,EiO V„r TEEPRC,i,FGWWYPEMOE1EIM E,ut:a/1MWIV RE MRFIWE Hant„aID5 R 11Eg1Y K .Y.WE 847542E w1Mf %EY.. MI4 NWLLM9RER.MWNE 1ryiv 0R..22RM1EMAP„_xl O mix T..Enna rvnc.L NMMPDS R•IIME./. 8M75 .1 MEP, a,SS NONL w,LR4 TREE CMW,IdE,. 6.5SF CAYET Bx CSwPY E.C. OY[. OKR R1-1„ ,ua,P Mil AWR.RRSMOMD4.Ooon,.,nIT OTC„LaMar.,CURrwa-aa„„NEI... R W...E. i.RElFYN1O mer VOI5E e1RE.e P.IITg2OT rME.wT ARCHITECTURE NURSERY am.IC 0RMEPER COME,TMETREE.O,..P,IEEOEuw16,..M. WR•m•Ex..Pmrw.MaER.SW.x 6vmlz•.n F. .mEE.wewwE:4V0PY ,.. NAM.a ART.PCwCEEIUMuS.PECRY..EP 0.v_Mx. •. .Is sroc.•xa.x¢I 1,E,42xrs Or,xE.Ea.MAeEcx M.AHEM ITT ME SDIRIae.m. _ NM SW lath Raw 1146 RI YAS KNIM1CI µ0x.*TLMx MA YFA%OT BUY CUYLOW.xOME We....CEDw1E FOP IEEE RNRMG.6hw1R TOTAL.6,03E-TEECA,YJAI AP.19EETµ.: non• 9F6...0.6�.•P.IOL IW NO C'OC*' ,W. 58 Penland,OR2M19 ANT MJ75.E..P.P OI AOE.801E T.,MRM,IS ROOLv D¢INMEO 50 IIEPE IE LIKELY 6.19.1I1 POST.....1 MO (ML m¢SND•.EPM$mx xATVEIEE..a/ EV PS PP EA• dream.OF Sau . ATLLmOLSEDVIE TPEECMpPYCOVEwAE 36.. RMIP4M6u SET..111E PM1IM5 LOT MO 61DEVONA II42 E01-758-6„) TPEE,,,,E: rIMTg2Af..NMw'OA..333 y6EDTOLOC1.SOa 3.,...vuv08SOEOOM....I Ix.a.ItiulUrvcOVEP RECIPE ¢sw 'mamma„nap Ea WY rtAeMAxv.Pw%nTO TJRw3T,E etE Ras«NS.•91Wry1anpMcel.IM.epRVJ6E MS EPMDEO S1uLE.twLCrM Cuv1/M.awex, 1h I NI 6m CNCIM •' 6 SP Own ERMr.'np,yRwlu,S.sTulu•S,N. ICM1Cq'MES NECR.OVEP PATWLOT A _ o W D M ME �1 MMLDOEL.MD.., E.MEdE M E_wD P oT comm. ...„.„„a Coma 542 9E CASCARA Attachment 4 N.YOPEK d 8SCEMTEEDDEL%,,,,, 1515,,,,,Sn1OwsM,,,,33 PYRETEP.SYIp...3.1xW C.Al1YRV Cd..TCPEEM[.CIry REU,...5 ME WP�i,MI•fC WVFARRODPF�L VELM. Y mf 0E...6......ML,De�Tm TDADErM,xE„TE1„MTEEi0.,D<la,... Os M,CSmm.61.6.ie,DesT.w30382. l,a OF YAM WASTE croMc.EmxER.C mI I.wPP....w.RY,u TO Rau. 1°' ass TIE 6.6rm7.ru.S r il£ro rmr G.. Be Cuc.w 14.4 215. aal 9F v. aer 29.EIE66 MAX TYE MOM.l CFmsmr.OJMimw 847584E Karr 1Ea90 PEW®CIEIMMESnFRWTHSMCNYIES ..,C W.V..REfAMW LOT..WDPV• OIINEIEOIR V W5F OVER IIE.wJWT R IKWeE111C/MA/. .3...O{ .. M. 6.xe0. a„.„„ TEE „„ SR_ op.., „A„, „law a OPmano„1„S'PEER,woo sum,.MM.. F� W 36 nomad TREE 10 aa EEPDFIPLHF - - tE LA9 PRWIM. suL NR M5R-NM MNWn1a WCFNIEA 'PFF TONI[9NPCNY NLRIES. , M.MI[OM . 'REEiOAw{1npxAxi OR MYOmEOa mamma T1EECMY.„EA I _.._-. 0 S ,W,E6U, O...w SELL uR lO lS TOExm8EPWMIXECEOIEPOP11EIL.100E 08w P WRIT WT 3.4 IV Si • wPiEOM lEm. 60 1.6F 3. MON POST.warm,' manta amss Emss leilik 'SID -I / IE;4N�42FamRR1.•.•R1F. /• 9MEIIIY[I.DS Wf 1 lie 111 -E/ --_j - - - - _--__—__—____. l- ,---i. #1". i I i. / *11i� / / SUBMITTED FOR / LAND USE REVIEW NOT FOR d; = CONSTRUCTION j / IIIIIIL42E CIE �- E.;:: ----- -_ I ....1 la Cy �` 1 , • FSAS Bldg Renovation 9015 Hunxlbr Skeet Tgartl,OP 91213 0,, .... i -� IIIIII� JJjO. KAM., A 1 -. IIIIII i ICI 4 it, Girl. Inc ,....gris.....0....... ..0 . 1 AA"" ,.•rl �mm.1� .MOD PAOER.ArrEEi1w'm• I TreeP - _ TEE Caw 9ln RAN MB.E Proposed �OF T.MTOF woi. DP IT Paw A0.05 —uaMAOM,CYWIMb AMWI 1 Tree Plan-Proposed a;Pl 1 it.so' i June 29,2020 1' ERAGAN Jul 9,2020 Lisa st Christie, for tie A SW Hture r Y Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 12 of 13 �� e3 ASSOCIATES, INC. GJJ ARRORICULTURALCONSULTANTS Attachment 5 Effective Canopy Summary 2x Canopy Area(sq.ft.) 2x Canopy Area(sq.ft.) 1.25 x Mature Mature Canopy 1.25x Mature Effective of Preserved Trees of Preserved Stands Canopy Area Area(sq.ft.)of Canopy Area Tree Canopy Canopy(Canopy Area (w/condition and (w/condition and (sq.ft.)of Native Non-Native (sq.ft.)of Area(sq.ft.)per Area/Project Lot No. (sq.ft.) preservation rating>2) preservation rating>2) Planted Trees Planted Trees Planted Stands Project Area Area) overall site 93,218 0 0 28,221 0 0 28,221 30% The minimum requirements for effective tree canopy cover are outlined below: 1.Subdivisions and land partitions: a.40 percent for the overall development site in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 zones,and 15 percent for each lot designated for single detached house development. b.33 percent for the overall development site in the R-12,R-25,and R-40 zones. 2.Apartments:33 percent for the overall development site. 3.Nonresidential development:33 percent for the overall development site,except nonresidential development in the MU-CBD,MUC-1,I-L,and I-H zones and schools(as defined in TCDC Section 18.60.050.J)are only required to provide 25 percent for the overall development site. 4.Mobile home parks:33 percent for the overall development site. 5.Wireless communication facilities:zero percent for the overall development site. Teragan Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835•fax 503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 13 of 13 Attachment 6 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. The site plans and other information provided by Christie Architecture and other members of the project team was the basis of the information provided in this report. 2. It is assumed that this property is not in violation of any codes, statutes, ordinances, or other governmental regulations. 3. The consultant is not responsible for information gathered from others involved in various activities pertaining to this project. Care has been taken to obtain information from reliable sources. 4. Loss or alteration of any part of this delivered report invalidates the entire report. 5. Drawings and information contained in this report may not be to scale and are intended to be used as display points of reference only. 6. The consultant's role is only to make recommendations. Inaction on the part of those receiving the report is not the responsibility of the consultant. 7. The purpose of this report is to: • Prepare a Supplemental Arborist Report for the proposed development as required by Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 10.3; • Provide recommendations for meeting the street tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 12; • Provide recommendations for meeting the parking lot tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 13; and • Coordinate,provide recommendations, and a signature of approval for the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan prepared by Christie Architecture as required by Chapter 18.420 and Urban Forestry Manual Sections 10.1 and 10.2. Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle*Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835•Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com CleanWate\Services SENSITIVE AREA PRE-SCREENING SITE ASSESSMENT Clean Water Services File Number 20-002143 1. Jurisdiction: Tigard 2. Property Information(example: 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): Name: 2S101 BD00300 Company: FRED SHEARER&SONS Address: 8015 SW HUNZIKER STREET OR Site Address: 8015 SW HANZIKER STREET City,State,Zip: TIGARD, OR, 97223 City,State,Zip:TIGARD, OR, 97223 Phone/fax: Nearest cross street: Email: 4. Development Activity(check all that apply) 4. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to single family residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: ADAM CHRISTIE ElLot line adjustment 0 Minor land partition Company: Christie Architecture ❑ Residential condominium 0 Commercial condominium Address: 9532 SW 18th Place ❑ Residential subdivision 0 Commercial subdivision City,State,Zip: portland, OR, 97219 ❑ Single lot commercial ❑ Multi lot commercial Phone/fax: 5037566677 Other COMMERCIAL ADDITION Email: adam@christiearchitecture.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? ❑Yes 0 No 0 Unknown Location and description of off-site work: 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project: SITE HAS CWS VEGETATIVE CORRIDOR OVERLAY ON TIGARD MAPS GIS THAT WILL HAVE SELECT PLANTING.BUILDING IMPACTS>82'AWAY. This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits, Building Permits,Site Development Permits, DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality, Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form, the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative, acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true, complete,and accurate. Print/type name ADAM CHRISTIE Print/type title Signature ONLINE SUBMITTAL Date 7/29/2020 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY 0 Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site.THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. 0 Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider Letter as required by Resolution and Order 19-5,Section 3.02.1,as amended by Resolution and Order 19-22.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable /local,State and federal law. 17 Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider Letter as required by Resolution and Order 19-5,Section 3.02.1,as amended by Resolution and Order 19-22.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. ❑ THIS SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS NOT VALID UNLESS CWS APPROVED SITE PLAN(S)ARE ATTACHED. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by "4o41n.z.1�.aA Date 08/14/2020 Onc omplete,email to:SPLReview@cleanwaterservices.org • fax: (503) 681-4439 OR mail to: SPL Review,Clean Water Services,2550 SW Hillsboro Highway, Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Revised 2/2020 ..�:„tea,... ... ... �� Main Office • 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • p:503.681.3600 f: 503.681.3603 • cleanwaterservices.org ED,.ExD25 PAPANAxD,Et CHRISTIE „NE A W. NA SONSIRV R.NDS meeau �A eIIEAIs•. 1mA WEnweaE: ARCHITECTURE M.O.READ.0.•STAL.ripe. -EI 9532 SW 1BM Piaca .Suantns a aerrue REon FMIEM,OR 4YH9 COVERAGE mmune,urE wb Ei STALW.. 5037S& 1 LOTS.: REDEVELOPED ORE WILLINVEEE STALLS. CATSee RR.aWN`IFeS` PROPOSED 9VWIx660VEIN0E N.IISSE OR DECREASE TO MIMEO PMurnmµRL ME P•RRM ROOFS SOF SITS Pur puvmq LOR RESTNPED PARR.LOTUVWE. OXESSOLE PM.. 2110 ROM: 4400SE IWO So eccESSELE P1w555 SPACES ARE 5EOURA.TvstE ARE ONO TOTAL 5KONO L3. EI.RTbP STMNNOS A.E15 REMVE ANEW,TIRO ACCS8ANR PAWINGEFPACE VM1cEEPROVIC®. wcarr MST.ROE RTESTRap POW.SPACES. ♦OALL440V ••OCE55 SPACEREDEVELOPED.,Val NUT TO PM Y NSES ono ME TYPE wily ET PE WOW O[rtx Eat CORPEM RMB COW R[aNYF _ AMMO E OW le n weOF ACC 1 °r—YI_ - l I\ I I \Is J./ I i / / IF\ _/ 1 REVISIONS /o/ f _--�_ I_11 ill ; I / ' � NEW TREES n)6 AREA SEE MOO&M O ' II/ .-- w \ / \ - MM... \y,1 /I / '/ InuDNO PSTPPI5, N. 1 G- ✓ / E ulnscAPEOTxIe SIEA, ` i / / .W.AROcx•OBulb NEW S=Ir.nW`Xlwnm 1� SUBMITTED FOR "'FFF t ' nes mere, er,a ELECTRICAL CIER 1aICAL E RR COVERED o[�. IEW a I.AR TO REMAIN. /it \ / EIN.`DIWSDWx n DOOMS WTe NEW �6sro PARA. LANDUSEREVIEW- / •clrsxln ExcLDuwEro TOR... uwESn°IWEt NOT FOR 1...0.8114E PA.. W i MS,AMMON FOR NEW WHOOP CONSTRUCTION i ut Mm9 _T { _, r RmEow,S A , --- - 1 c l I FS85 Bldg Renovation R yy yy I) /P I I �pCMVNSiDPdIW� I py myORETE WNt� IEW dMgElF...till. ___ `I01 DC PRvryO R+RFINN. T i / 9 a 0 1 _. { ♦ Ras.voEArocAPw g ^` MAEn FEE/amarox �pEpRtP551rvcSE _�Z /. /♦ n p :",_...A. .. wan�" F SITEPIAN- _„Nn-- o PROPOSED 5 encum ro Kam. Pew Inas en )st IA0.02 IDF.E® NaLAT .: 181ePlan.Proposed M0AB1 urx.+=EDSLVLN 1 1 '20 I zo I June 29.2020 SOEN1011..TIWwTE6 PR0.am0Nr!Tree 020T�eerme PWNTOP.E4OLmwEEOVweOIgRYOE MEECNCPIMF CHRISTIE _ ,4F*�e.To' AM....911.�R,.,0E1m.< G AMA µo. am %cm. aen nem N.0 wIOSIV 19uGww.lxw.T.wM05WITRe1EIM P5.0 orP9G: ]gee -ram OWunxO Mk,.TREE:MO,FME,'. kill SG v.YUR ITIO MwVRWF .F OVER ml�21010ea.1110*0w MAI.SO eenm.roP IF110�E 0Em.�mr.=Ecana.Tm 1100.1a.Em. Em0Fw0 EG.xGPO Ga,Ew.E ,4EEl.0lE1 TM'i• ARCHITECTURE *evem000r euerre"FEFll.Rea...EEE.rea .E.xmma.nox or.urtmorw„(um FOR w.sERY erm,wlm1)MA 1 1.. c.weW ee ov EkeeLLoroRT4Em. �pwgmej[O rt¢ n., -mePMw9010!P..V.tt rowiO3*00*T Nne SURw�nom M 9532 SW OR Face row sae sow oases or work sw) uuro VERWar SW WWI LOW MOMS ewOCEMe ISMINTE POI Tar Prlatia GROW, me, 1PAS14F TaRE). IDsn Es .T.v*TTx1T Sees er eem@ cunt wwRo SURFACE PPY006. C' ' Si Parse OR 97219 FaromaW 111Tpamper,IYPEn M1MNspNWT 1YT TOO ama is xew0 n lsnes0SOT«6m7 k O01 O .141.ST wow.N0 I TR W EESEY0E Fan 4E nuwn COVERAGESWOT e191N TxstaLsO .Nt is roar 1Yaleolo.P.wo22 LoaSLOOSaxn COW. v.e se sr NMW4000110PV COV950ER .1,203 Si WO. 6t CYFJM 11191011.111Y MOIRE SPREAD 9.TO...!IF On1JIEC 0001HCNE Wear.WOW Wawa Tro Wawa Lwow sorrow SOS-786867-1 I1 0AM1VSTCPESCS RMIN PTE➢SWLFFILLCAE Cur wiEto easeresursAs soo we resairero moue.neve.emu.or men so Laos.sec screw a row LAM.Of WOO Ew.EVF k�64/10GIVI rem es mow ex Oar ALOE wows amiss.usa macaw To sax sou To aworsorrar.MEW SOL NM NSGE PEPS NO LO]SELYor arrow raw•MQm ma NIE 604MITmVE111. _ O.wvl.Rdaecn PAR..WO.ReA CASCARA IE ME WEISEnCs4T. RME tNOw OVER1IERRwe cm worm...aro ow W e.� sr 1411.01.91k SLOPE Of CMIPACIE2191111,14E EDGE Di nw mew 14110LE Or �Elcurs Rm mwwww sp w,ra . ora y awa oxm.�E�IwErms: Gala. saw e S OF ONO WATEPFIEF NFLOkY11WEA THE SWISS Al.'awry,Yu-Manua .cONPI Y+ SWAM Woo ea M1Y In e} TK®E MO maw 611Tr9E lI mamas. Da CNCIM al ow Pa LESS TWN ro ONM110Ew TOTAL OJMANO ILANIE gIM.000 IEpf®GUY...,NM new Ma kW LWOW MEaaaar WO1sR1E1OW Okra r wawa craw arAMEaw _ GR TEEEors CC1WE 6174024 WWII. WAR 'Wit p@ CCNtlIew spasm NIMMSGN CFMER'RCM TEE TO 11.091.11FN.E PIIV1116 011.94E41E lam. m nee eel 15., MT y �/�{ ee wawwrtdas, n. ,s .ae cusp MBF swim NEI£mF£F nE -�^ �-. �../ to a Wuw1s .suu MB .sfl2NN WWx.WGENIEIIFSWI11EE lONOW311aNJ U1M1nIE6. sow 1 on. ftl ea es Wlwisslu VMVwO GEMEAARIIEE TO a FM14xMMMU 92 Oar mEFEPVt nee se ere es el NTurtlxES0 N 0 E P,E`.W Y04 .A0AL BIB 5EEMTV11 0100001EFRPONTRGV1EPu1x101.R TOME x WOEgE se CEIn1n00413* P[.xlmwr,ONYTenT so,N en wars as sew Ta WOO. VW 1ata WSW.wormy maw F25FSi s.MV eEe ,, -_ p - - - - - — - - c _ T 1 J L x fi, / 11 411' mau ,roTw.11TM�. ,�� wW�E mr�E - I LI EY.Ce -------- --------------- Ay*, y, / N. is23 V N Ipi , ...-- .L / • 'i�'•� / a l , / ` SUBMRTED FOR ' LAND USE REVIEW• rdia, ' / NOT FOR '/----'�- CONSTRUCTION 0I/ �� plpCo -_ -ten=-=-y 1 E �I,� rii 1i i I Ailli4 ere/ / 1 E/. E.• I BM Hun907 Seam TquJ,OR 9]}2J 1110, _--_-11...1.:..N1, :l 5i, n: _rir s . 11iii0 .mnmNu 4 oI\ r ' e�� —I 4 x+.owY. ] r 8 r. . 2 '•w - ee'W- triallMaidhillso +€ Tree Mee- waERtnEnxanw a Propose0 nWor sw mawFOE�,klMEE WSW,'WE i A0.05 iaWwEE uRIF4wNWaRaT imiim E cum SAL;,m,94 s le so Fu,L 1 Tree Plan-Proposed iKU. t•=zo l._T i June 211,2020 CleanWate\ Services SENSITIVE AREA PRE-SCREENING SITE ASSESSMENT Clean Water Services Fife Number 20-001317 1. Jurisdiction: City of Tigard 2. Property Information(example: 15234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): 2S101 BD00300 Name: Company: Fred Shearer&Sons Address: 8015 SW Hunzlker St OR Site Address: City,State,Zip: Tigard,OR 97223 City,State,Zip: 8015 SW Hunziker St, Tigard,OR 97223 Phone/fax: Nearest cross street: SW Wall St Email: 4. Development Activity(check all that apply) 4. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to single family residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: Adam Christie ❑ Lot line adjustment ❑ Minor land partition Company: Christie Architecture ElResidential condominium El Address:condominium Address: 9532SW 18th Place ❑ Residential subdivision ❑ Commercial subdivision City,State,Zip: Portland,OR 97219 ❑ Single lot commercial ❑ Multi lot commercial Phone/fax: 503.756.6677 Other Commercial Addition Email: adamOchristiearchitecture.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? ❑Yes ® No ❑Unknown Location and description of off-site work: 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project: Site has a CWS vegetative corridor overlay per Tigard Maps GIS.The proposed work is min 82'away from this zone(opp side of site). This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality, Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form, the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative, acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. Print/type name Adam Christie Print/type title Christie Architecture Signature )'7C_COL91:1 Date 5.12.2020 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site.THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider Letter as required by Resolution and Order 19-5,Section 3.02.1,as amended by Resolution and Order 19-22.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State and federal law. X Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider Letter as required by Resolution and Order 19-5,Section 3.02.1,as amended by Resolution and Order 19-22.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. ❑ THIS SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS NOT VALID UNLESS CWS APPROVED SITE PLAN(S)ARE ATTACHED. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2).NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PR VI IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by Date 5/26/2020 Once complete,email to:SPLReview@cleanwaterservices.org • Fax: (503)681.4439 OR mail to: SPL Review,Clean Water Services,2550 SW Hillsboro Highway,Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Revised 2/2020 Main Office • 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • p:503.681.3600 f:503.681.3603 • cleanwaterservices org 188'-Bye' / / \ REAR PROPERTY LINE I ....'.'...... ..'-'.' I__— (E)LANDSCAPING I I II I I (E)LANDSCAPING CAhAI. ' (E)CONC RAMP&STAIR I I y . I /.4 ) (N)CURB LINE i CC y, DASHED LINE OF(E)EDGE OF CC 7 O LANDSCAPING nmbi .. �. I I (E)LANDSCAPING I v a L, All II s G .. .j. (N)PARTIALLY COVERED ,n 3 ENTRY W/CONC STAIR 8 RAMP(483 SF) V (E)BUILDINGI (N)LANDSCAPING FOOTPRINT B I (34.321 SF) ��. (N)COVERED DECK(330SF) `�// (N)LANDSCAPING L:,....... ...... 1 (N)CONC® t", EXTERIOR I STAIR 1 (E)CURB • (E)LOADIN ZONE: I-L — FRONT SETBACK: 30' .. SIDE SETBACK' 0' STREET SIDE: 20' Pp,,` — REAR SETBACK: 0' 45' NTSp.d.CK 7. ` .Ir_ MAX SIZE SF A LOT SIZE: 93,218 SF cc R TP`` ROPER NE . (E)LANDSCAPING 38c3 • -----------------------/ 0' 20' 40 80' N SITE PLAN: 8015 SW HUNZIKER ST, TIGARD, OR 97223 CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE LLC 9532 SW 18TH PLACE PORTLAND,OR 97219 MAY 12,2020 CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 9532 SW 18M Pk. P.M*.OR 97219 .0.1150€6 1 / ' Hurt NNE ---/ _ m g. -Ns, OF GPM ASNOWAIIM p �Es'Me��"""` s.ew usour. SUBMITTED FOR e iereuw''"iioemaw.in... �\ �oswu.99«. "aro",`s,oPow "° 11 LAND USE REVIEW- e___ __ _ sffwm. ' NOT FOR i ' — - CONSTRUCTION / — I gym," © a V_ li _ _ __ _ _ _ FB&5 Bldg Renovation y 1> u.m[Ps,xue �i \ \�} I 9D1S Hunker SM1wI [ 1 t / s[Ebm. 1 Toped,OR 97223 • =a -.6 J - - na.,A PE..,RR,1., -_re++_= I,••.;: € 1n FX SHU,nrs.ORE.. inmmu1.1*Mu. G/DEMD V.e . EXISTIN ,t. .o.�. . .e. I [A0.01 ro�w9amwn�nr u•+esm.,w awsnrrwn 1 Site Plan-Existing/Demo lion .mns«m ee.inow, I ,"SO' I June 29.2020 mom rows � SONE I. ROOD �a Or YeY CHRISTIE m1EAlar. moms.ovnurbarbrob Ps t'�°mrf10WRDSUE. !MAY ARCHITECTURE oatamNWT • PT3 RECO,as arALEs r..0%as •R1 p532 SW 1BN Place w 101,0 o marxu REun Pg11 1d.O09R19 c°vERwE s9a're3asn w:al50.Loy MORE ED REDEVELOPED mlcwux..c.2 MUD PwoNDM oE. x,�P:ss ME m 0PLAT(0007Ra wR lE.STT EWE P.N.S VOLTS PE0 PM8wfl EOTuran. ITT MOOR- aan TWIN Eb96E PARRIED REAM.EDE RFGMI®. PE TE MEMO If1FTOTAL NIL..EH. 1 REavalx4NOE NO ME ROMA EDE •MEW TIR,Rcctsame RUMP SPACE MIL BE PROM.. PRIWmPEOO.¢I SIAYaIlAl SF ♦Mil.;RE00' WINDY PMgq 9I8 0 S NT MM REDEVELOPED OiIIWElell TO VARx.BMEBAIO MDR WEE TYPE DEER TINE CUCmErE0.URBEM0. YE AMMO. our or vox w .R b T . _ _ -Z - i PP i %' 0 s / r 11 r '°' 1 1\ /l i r i �/ E-/ / 0Y.EE - NYVIIIIEFS MO SEE,ma.x.. Y,.am r 1 . r 1 m \ `\/ A---,--- r / %� Ir IIVIIDEWC POO/PATT, -'� i i\% 4 � , /:: ; k re R0T:A�A err �sm��mR r / / SUBMITTED FOR / K� °P' ECTRICAL TP.EswAA:m —mRAN EST. LANDUSEREVIEW- /j• r IYIn.Yn+a MCP s�PrAu"`s roE`E r orore 3wccoawEmleA.r. aroro aoOT nTOYER 0.9. NOT FOR 1 — ��F -- a-'°EP _ CONSTRUCTION K.(9 R°IIEe l c11 \ - � 1 11 I 1 I FSBS Bldg Renovation ,f 0 / 7 b15 NunilERr Sorrel 6. / / TICW,OR BR23 IFEPR'I[fE WHF iFEMIeT'WHF RI IF PAVNe IORENVI.� I / `\ IA A. '' Tic ./ 9 \11 • 1 - -r ll ._ .._--=�:�— __ ! nR"vxs inuEiew°a iom° W+R Mil J SITE PUN O _ 1 PROPOSED € lYwYro mYn i NEW TREES ANDLONESOPPROD . m ® 0R02 Site Plan-Proposed I Jorm29,2020 VIWC.fl NTfs I.FW2RDM-TBCFRcw9VOE CHRISTIE 911,999.993Ds Tot.2 see,MRXD. ., ass ARCHITECTURE ores,2 ewes, 9532 SWIM Piece se -ere 39 90912212,0997219 es less 503)59-08)) se es Se se Nner m)Cm tu44tlPE4 M16Y II91 TC.N\Be Mr".. wee se 2•1992.4 MI.flfl VXµVATE01.VtsAPYOWNER*vl l4S4 SF 1&O48FI erfmPT ITrt22 2n1oC wlw FFFF WSW Ca.T1-161EFMRE.EWREMan PFryMEYEMS MEWL _____ ___ SIDE FF°FEPn ONE 1 11 ` I�/ ,' / i r\\ / L I SUBMITTED FOR i/ \' / / �FE.EReE1EcrRqu rP.wsFo9 Pmxwx. LANOUSEREVIEW- uB•••coss•ros•ss..E 4 NOT FOR -',- /� - y , ;- CONSTRUCTION El '"n0$L4F / FS&S Bldg Renovation / I 3Y9LAN3,4 -,,,,, __ // HYnanX9e \ _� sss., BW4U.wu. 4 Ti — X015 Street _ TgaN.OR 92223 LMANDSCAPEOAREl :� _ IOSSFuPOBUPETMEA. _- ; B Fro Py 11 { B .8. ee°.PEo� % ^. e mob. --- o LANDSCAPING Be ,.-In A0.03 4/ I 1 Site Plan-LAnd0r ping Panw,a • SCALE` "s:e°F1o;.r F 1.T 20 r=mI June 29,2020 rso..RMWNGLOTm...coses. 9.... .:°MA., CHRISTIE "OEw .mnawsvne wlwE..EEDMae.Me. *°'•°' se.• ttIosv o 1ER wool. 1w...v.. IWREwLOT E."Los ARCHITECTURE Em,.r.TREE.OezRe .n X OVEAE1 W.L2........MuloEs.uu11 0gEMO. S1 MI MO 92 SW Pk. wMeioY uin.. Ivv. .EV ss.ve vs MEMw....8088..inEO or/ is y.Y WS. pgF PMYN.OR 97210 ♦.iEESEn..t IS1 Em2n CURSOR HARD w°E.0EEe0Sa. wTURE.REE 1120 u¢. I I .6.9.6.7Y.NEMTUE.°.v°FamoL01E0_A°xs PM w sacs, WY DnJ..566671 .YY RBVK eel SE ..m"vu.ER — ML EVonot. T [n9F.tlwmfRM _ _ .O... ..MEC[WNisivve E901 llES.. E.ot56E W V REYT2 M1 •ffi ;C9YPVMGORE00 095 P.1MXOLOT _ pLOOIS WIY n.ovE oV WS.EM.CMpov WVEn rEWw. w MRL[ WRT '^`Rm W�sec 166 WO% MXW46A3.007.9M9n40 w3NE .bY RE.. es s S 8630.0 COVER S.S SE 1.3. FASMDSIIE.PEEC.IIKPVCO015°E P SW SF HOME 13% V. RED OM V 69. ]1f6Y Avow se, 1.1Y levev ♦V.. ..SE.v.v... IM vas. Ma. 01.SF en v Is..9..6. I mo.E a TV. IC.. zn ken. In WU.FW11.sr.mos BF. T meeEmrule.� /_ - I / / / I 1 KVISIW / ...____. —�T / SUBMITTED FOR / LAND USE REVIEW- i ,.1—N, vvv / NOT FOR I X __._r./^_w CONSTRUCTION m you ,'�JIr�_ -- ` i {�'__—"r'—__ ii Ns. PSBR Bldg Renovation _ _ I 6.. /,__ ' / '�I ``;�\```\\.9 `} � 8015 HunxWar SbeN / `\ /I \ \ I .OR 97223 I `X /' I 1 nX\l Lb\- I I I —1—' 9 r/ L I I , \ XI "'-')\ : ::, . 47—.11)721H .--- ' ',1... ' ----7 — a"` ____. s Plan• a Tom wwEwTw. c. rv,,L,„ Ss Exing/Demolition g I.M li A0.04 i �DE� AFw. II. MBOY9. 1 Tree Plan-Existing/Demolition g�E 'SIA 1 1^=20' owe I p. 1 June 29.2020 ,a,PRE.wMNMlfd MM09®91EAFE a.w.'/fA>LRtlE PRO.Ofm MRRNB Cal TREE 1M aNOPY TAKE wM,usr TE EFFECTIVE URi.RealsREMe.,R.w.E Y.R m INS.P.LICARLF M/PPMagar,a. Y.u.. E.,w Mani ,CANOPY AMA CHRISTIE inAla Waal FORESTRY_ F nunm a Ee Vocnnm WE r.REwcw Mlv u6UrowS Pmrtvr1 Wan mama SITE AREA: YA10F miAL awhmcwrwE Ma Cum,AREA BOY SE VOLUME CNVOP' C� OVER OVER Ina Ma asee 'RTAIAw.aMA.PE.YWEDEaEEacRiso,TREOR.WW.A..K.REOaaRACmR6 BowomLol. C.a... ...a MEE Mal EREE. 6MRw PATO,LOT RavaRBLai ARCHITECTURE IlaSE .I MaRY Mgrna MEET991Au.ERnan a5lcre i,TRE KER.,Ann rat ibKalERMEN[Mal..NURSERY 6TFB WM MI FOR tm COVa£MOE:_v ,M1GRADE PWfvxC wTPIE(WOES NCLI.YB ALL AREAS MRECm,OVER AREA ODES NOTCMae) �PAM.Ra CSSOOFS ev[AHOMEAS R mxwo SOIW000PASE aacw Sc ATF Oss SUR SW 1 Mad TE BNE9OR9 RINFrtOrALdS.BSVLLW uroRWOT XIV CLAY LOAMaa ARErwaR Ea ACEOwm Pw IREExanw.STAYN mik PRS5.I0e c„,,,„rv.1EEPFTYEER. anff CASCARA F i PMIud.On MVO TpFEE6MBMVD9mAROWmIERE a WEI,SgNMMm PYTwwxlw,MO TUNS aael2 FOR la,RATVETRERAGE:P II LEAST Bum E SV I,mar SE oToPI nm5LI:WOR'MMR� CASCARA 010E mF 6Awmrro 6,0,avi,YCx w lEma,,,,. 6„,s6„6.6,EECAww,co,.,.: anaT✓+ WCNA 'L 22 SF 501]S6EGl1 EwL t.a aa»0•90,Aa wawwcu5rvcwa PEa0Pm. ax PavwEa PNiei Lm FEN.TOPu.R Ainv9IXFR[.SPREAD TO Haim4OE ORGANIC 0•11.�O.M C4WI01 CRRMa IFPSPPEa0E0 SAL rAt ev CuhEupLwFM 'iR IMO* soo ask F OIEmrt6.Y6E.MCRHCEIO W¢Tp6BMxCEPnIFmNt SOLMOLMOEPFIDwFMiwVNCORP000TT wE9W AICvltl 511! OPFEAim4 WE11hW3 MAW,AREasECar Ba oji,n ,IRM: e➢aF CASCuu PIF OS,, ahA P.wRRq IDm 25, EOi Of TIE MPWO(ANKLE a r6OS,SO AS Nei TOIi1M tWA TIE MVW0816M0ESA Can,MAR TIEREEORECm PEdIwEWEMB YE M,a'Sara ALONG THE EWES OF PARR,ENO RT WALLS 00 ROT TLL TO ArFTNIFAIERWUN RE MTrCWOaarIa. REI. YM,COVER WEE A0.RI. Am a CASCARA se if Si AFTER Rays. TOP6q MOM.s 6MVEta vup WASTE OIWAL MEaK11r ON1 Ta 511PlACE M LiNala ILL TO MEAN aRR11R1 NC Sax ROCA.. 1 a1Y T,9 90R rlO TERTu`R.vnArETo mE wA W of0MS TWA TR MM.Of SMT TAL auroAIaymwE EE F ac,,Wlm 1E0.Y90 CLEM..S Pa MEW TREES RW MUMS CAM,AD COCATWEVHSTE PAW=SOT TREEGKNB W13E T VYY cs, es SF OVER IRE Auana OF THE CURRENT CAROM OPwRTS Mae Waoaa ,,, FAva NM.,"NOE,.FROM ME TO WRO 6MTAct PAWa. PUTEn 29 Ca NA. Kr 1WY SWRQ pm C.3009 NN( 6aE MO TES To IREE acc EX IS T wA1u,MEe wRVNE i 0 1a MM Id. Me n9lWw1 YM1wxw¢NTEPR T,,,cc,,,,wa CN B g F C'N'C-`W' OTTEONI ASS /�-� Vaal'bC CENmm V OR ROWE OAK „cc., ea SF winmETRE wAAMA I ` - , V (ECCN M.AM 0Cu BRB As allovm 1,,,,,,,M1TECCNTMKmETRLM[m,aMalmo am O.Vl i am aaa EYSTNC E,vxrAPv .___ 3WS tFR wart OM w caWLMTE.aE.amuN..ORvl.aveoa a OR Nal Oa W. Ace Ica a WWmEiN a., acc, a, ro.Wa aAni sass ac,c LAI61AE —___ 26 ____ ____ _ ___:_ _ ipf-- ---r--- • / mmosoYENmRWT.aRmi. b /P 26 6mYa,E1 NmALaE 1 • ifilA!24- IIIIII iL / ! SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW- i) /- NOT FOR s _ ,�,� r CONSTRUCTION fr 01201' �� 0 I�u-'11��1 -� r�-we>•1— T r 1 1 r I FSBS Bldg Renovation Ara i b` b 6. III I I 80E6 HMrlker Weer T TgN,Oq e'W • I_—/ 2 ss b �� -�� Nil ;�` __ —I1� IIIIII„/ ` 1{ ata I 1 P— / ~ 35 1/- 4 '� _ L T `-- _r—, _elli t k ° il►-' r., t as L_, — i_ — r � � 9,-_ .++ L WOO PMaeL ArtEBTTMTTc Tree STn- -_ "R""._ -'-'' RMS.RR IWUWIWYE EEamrsPwsim6oK b Proposed -- .,-, :4 A0.05 ----- YNOER,- -NISORO 1 Tree Plen-Proposed woo W m.a�: n'=20' I Junto 29,2020 O 0 O O T CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 9532 Sw 16N vli. PMIY8.0507219 5W]554522 nR CW g6m FERRER,.Of E RRE EAST EK SEE Mn m. pm m Wn[n.CxFe. N1 aroREM wERIq 3 aEERww_ 9 Plmvx� irok -.as CANOPY mw -- mwwer .a:I.nwA .nw Fnsml .. .EaeRE.. __ _SCUPPER __ 1 1 1 w+l_Wwl 'N�n.ml OMOMMER)we wErpOPLRV NOR, ,p an �p4 `T e' I I� e` 1"� .eat.IREEI'I' NI REES MARINO ORE.In :. I..wn 1 it —{ ®eEwc __ -- __ r ws ue.IREu<. NE GOURD.. ..E�..sIm.End,[REM Enmos®.m.R. MEER.HnE...ureronRwr J.waEo.sR.w neEm ERwvvon oro12•nar....ay _ RENEWERS OPEC EmS MERE 8rtw0297 1 Building Elevation(East) T OE . ® SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FS,S Bldg Renovation RO woERza,--- Exvsn.. PAPYRI npxaswuvr Enw 8016 HInxlkar Street GLL rr'I.�Iewl.. rou l•uEml E .ew numl_ G a.N®1NEn -- j ....ns --- % ml�esR IItfi 'ST EI•I.in wo1.,R.rl" ERvaaFe - vnus M CURE,TT II 29 cot.5-run 1 w..mE...a....... p BUILDING am.cw.E F ELEVATIONS I A0.06 2Building Elevation-Canopy(East) 8 tie-1•o^ ,m.0 I June 29.2020 O O 0O CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE PM sw lean Place PbMM,OR 97219 503-75e.61377 u[a Ifl ROOF s[rao OR In ROOF0[.aa n.RRER iuw.l 9L°`'G0i'Vbw Rreecs rn2 anew m2. eR m+a cieaaa WOOD. R7,040(19 ',emcees 044RM1.13 FRLS m rm VARAPA CAP CTmuNEmOICO.ea e. g ;,,ems —— iR .m Wn euw mleirna n.uum.wWDwEmW. RWnRNE PAYE rclrmWR Wr:W ev R wn:: m CONE wwWr: v e : R cow wee Pc caw cum ere STAMM It CEDAR s.We R. MI COM 0.4.UP.suR ...aNC Mug,+.R CFCC 'x'TY, _ E Eesabex, WswsB CEDAR 9.0 :EWamaio. ,uxs w2m10caxD MUM WALL 1 Building Elevation(South) 2Building Elevation(North) Rr SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FS&S Bldg Renovation Inei9c[etun..'e A./NEW DECK A9.RBeWe.NXW,RRMECWWr 1,o .LReuyx 8015 HunzlWr Skeet vTa UR.~A.C.• r 19 WMMrY&nWW BEYOND -_0RR0.M9CNFW ANT L Tigard.OR 97223 /Jf(l fAq:: r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ mtmwnm xary .:.mi:: Ix rem I _ r�I piso n __ T nx rw.._/-L ❑ •��/ I.. .k\ 'I�' r 1 l n ❑ ❑ eJ twafDwWEwP S P FR.vwlc Ram wALL t { BUILDING ELEVATIONS rAO.07 lding Elevation(East) 3 1/B•ro^ "'...4Bui p `38u ldng Elevation(Weal) i June 29.2020 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette , FEMA Legend 122°45'52"W 45°25'56"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT 1 0 l Wkhout Base Flood Elevation(BFE) ?- �� Zone 4.V.A99 .a SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth zone aE.ao.ae.SE.AR • j II HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway 1. 4. .. °., • ' 4, . a '„ •`.. 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard.Area """tt�iii... of 1%annual chance flood with average aII< 4- a v ,�— depth less than one foot or with dralnag t I' " .,` +,p ' " r! w areas of less than one square mile zone; Future Conditions 1%Annual e f t• > ° Chance Flood Hazard zone x 31 o~ ¢ Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to `a¢ r,. i' . 't OTHER AREAS OF Levee.See Notes.zone x ' j i■ ' s ♦ FLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone o t .• NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x •� r " `# ,� if e I Effective LOMRs # j IJI ... - OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard:�,,,. I% ; I ¢, ; - GENERAL Channel,Culvert,or Storm Sewer /ft STRUCTURES 11 11111 Levee,Dike,or Floodwall „iitsk. w• r so- 44 ." • co20•2 Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance tib iTs Water Surface Elevation z • A - Coastal Transect r ,. '.� © ,� —sn Base Flood Elevation Line(BFE)t' - s • ,�, Limit of Study e • I f l':' Sl , A III I Jurisdiction Boundary le w�. * - - Coastal Transect Baseline00' ,41067C0542E OTHER - Profile Baseline " - "g FEATURES Hydrographic Feature tr {r, 1 11f2056 ,' f F ,�•' ;- w Digital Data Available h *'* - No Digital Data Available A ., s'" • + � i k MAP PANELS Unmapped N_r _ - e" '• '" f mappe • 1 - "' `� •� `,; 1 O The pin displayed on the map is an approximate Nr . - y point selected by the user and does not represe di l t� an authoritative property location. ' ' " pp-• \ ,� ‘ , ,. s: This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of Y s s ` ' e. ' — • digital flood maps if It is not void as described below. 4 + The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap ` accuracy standards ', AR EA'OF MIN IMAL FLOOD HAZARD The flood hazard Information is derived directly from the •i _ MEW rc _ authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA.This map f'i�liAi was exported on 7/28/2020 at 3:01 PM and does not f I. reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and . r t• time.The NFHL and effective information may change or Ilik •� r, •[ "` become superseded by new data over time. t P • This map image Is void If the one or more of the following map V% elements do not appear:basemap imagery,flood zone labels, 11?4` I.l'. -r-el ri' '.i1n.-i lq:'-E �7` T `:? IlA;12U1 10 5: legend,scale bar,map creation date,community identifiers, C' 122°45'l5'W 45°25'31"N FIRM panel number,and FIRM effective date.Map Images for Feet 1 V 00o unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 regulatory purposes. CORRESPONDENCE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION • - a . . TIGARD` City of Tigard June 24, 2020 Christie Architecture Attn: Lisa Christie 9532 SW 18th Place Portland, OR 97219 Project: Fred Shearer & Sons, Inc. Site: 8015 SW Hunziker Road;WCTM 2S101BD, Tax Lot 300 Land Use Files: MMD2020-00023 and SLR2020-00002 Dear Applicant: The City received the above refenced land use application on June 11,2020. Staff has evaluated your application for completeness against Tigard's submittal requirements, and determined that additional information is required. I. Completeness Items In order for your application to be deemed complete, please provide the following additional information: • The subject site partially contains a locally significant wetland, stream, and vegetated corridor. Additionally, the site is located in the FEMA special flood hazard area. Please provide information on the proposed amount of ground disturbances or landform alterations in cubic yards of material for this project. If more than 50 cubic yards of material are disturbed or altered for this project,then a Type III Sensitive Lands Review will be required (Please refer to Section 18.510.020.G of the Community Development Code of the City of Tigard). II. Re-submittal Requirements Please e-mail the requested information to Lina Smith, Assistant Planner at LinaCSna,tigard- or.gov. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov Determination of Completeness Page 2 Land Use File MMD2020-00023 III. Completeness Options This letter contains the completeness review from all relevant City Departments. Please be advised that no further action will be taken on your application until one of the following events occurs: (1) you submit all completeness items, (2)you submit some completeness items and request that the City deem your application complete, or (3) you submit no completeness items and request that the City deem your application complete. Once your application is deemed complete, staff will review your application for approvability. IV. When Your Application Become Void Per ORS 227.178, your application will be void if one of the three actions listed above is not taken within 180 days of the date you submitted your application. The date on which your application would become void is December 8,2020. Please be aware that application fees are non-refundable. If an application becomes void, the City may retain some or all of the related application deposits. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, Lina Smith Assistant Planner Copy: MMD2020-00023 and SLR2020-00002 Land Use Files