Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
MMD2020-00023
NOTICE OF TYPE I DECISION MINOR MODIFICATION MMD2020-00023 mu .11111 SENSITIVE LANDS REVIEW SLR2020-00002 FRED SHEARER & SONS, INC. T 1 GARD 120 DAYS = November 24, 2020 SECTION I. APPLICATION SUMMARY FILE NAME: Fred Shearer & Sons. Inc. CASE NO.: Minor Modification(MMD) MMD2020-00023 Sensitive Lands Review(SLR) SLR2020-00002 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes a minor modification to an existing development at 8015 SW Hunziker Road. Specifically, the applicant proposes minor additions to the existing industrial building(including adding a new covered deck,and a new canopy with a ramp and stairs),and minor modifications to on-site parking,landscaping,and trees. This application also includes a sensitive lands review because the applicant proposes minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations involving less than 50 cubic yards of material within the Clean Water Services(CWS)vegetated corridor, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)special flood hazard area. APPLICANT: Christie Architecture Attn: Lisa Christie 9532 SW 18th Place Portland, OR 97219 OWNER: 8015 Hunziker,LLC 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 LOCATION: 8015 SW Hunziker Road;WCTM 2S101BD,Tax Lot 300 ZONING DESIGNATION: I-L: Light Industrial Zone. The I-L zone provides appropriate locations for general industrial uses including, but not limited to: industrial services, manufacturing and production, research and development, warehousing and freight movement, and wholesale sales activities with few, if any, nuisance characteristics such as noise,glare,odor,or vibration. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA: Community Development Code Chapters 18.330, 18.410, 18.420, 18.510, and 18.765.060.D MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 1 SECTION II. DECISION Notice is hereby given that the City of Tigard Community Development Director's designee has APPROVED the above request. The findings and conclusions on which the decision is based are noted in Section IV. SECTION III. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Site Information: The subject property is located at 8015 SW Hunziker Road,on the north side of SW Hunziker Road,east of SW Hall Boulevard, and west of SW 72nd Avenue.The development site is made up of one (1) tax lot (WCTM 2S101BD, Tax Lot 300), and contains one (1) industrial building, with associated parking and landscaping.The site is zoned Light Industrial (I-L),as are adjacent properties to the north,south,and east. The adjacent property to the west is zoned Parks and Recreation (PR), and contains a locally significant wetland,stream,and CWS vegetated corridor. City maps indicate that these sensitive lands extend onto the subject property. The subject site is also located in the FEMA special flood hazard area,but is not located in the floodway. SECTION IV. APPLICABLE REVIEW CRITERIA AND FINDINGS 18.330 Industrial Zone Development Standards: 18.330.040 Development Standards A. Base zone development standards are provided in Table 18.330.1. The applicant proposes a minor modification to an existing development at 8015 SW Hunziker Road. Specifically, the applicant proposes minor additions to the existing industrial building (including adding a new covered deck, and a new canopy with a ramp and stairs), and minor modifications to on-site parking,landscaping,and trees. Staff reviewed the applicant's materials to confirm the proposed building additions will comply with minimum setbacks and maximum building height for the I-L Zone. Additionally, the applicant's materials demonstrate that the site will continue to comply with the maximum lot coverage standard (85 percent). Standards for parking and landscaping are addressed in the findings below. These standards are met. B. Landscaping and screening. All required landscaping, including landscaping used to meet screening or tree canopy standards, is subject to the general provisions of Chapter 18.420, Landscaping and Screening. 1. The minimum landscape area standard is provided in Table 18.330.1. Landscaping standards are provided in Section 18.420.040.Any landscape area planted to the L-2 standard may count toward meeting the minimum area standard. The applicant proposes to update the site's design by removing and replacing existing on-site landscaping. Staff reviewed the applicant's plans to confirm this proposal will meet the minimum landscape requirement for the I-L Zone (15 percent),with 15 percent or 14,034 square feet of on-site landscaping provided. Additionally, the applicant states that all new landscaping will meet the L-2 landscaping standard (Table 18.420.1).This standard is met. 2. Screening standards are provided in Section 18.420.050. Screening is required as follows: a. Service areas and wall-and roof-mounted utilities must be screened to the S-1 standard. Service areas and utilities are also subject to the standards in Subsection 18.330.040.C. MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 2 The applicant does not propose to modify any existing services areas or utilities, or to add any new service areas or utilities.This standard does not apply. b. Nonresidential development that abuts a nonindustrial zone must be screened to the S- 3 standard along all property lines,except street property lines. The subject property is zoned I-L, and the adjacent property to the west is zoned PR. However, the proposed building additions will be located on the eastern building facade,and will not be visible from the western property line. Accordingly, staff finds that screening is not required for the proposed building additions,and this standard does not apply. c. Surface vehicle parking areas, loading areas, drive aisles, and stacking lanes for drive- through services within 20 feet of a street property line must be screened to the S-4 standard.Screening must be provided directly adjacent to the street property line,except where access is taken. The site contains existing on-site parking located within 20 feet of the street property line (abutting SW Hunziker Road);however,the applicant does not propose to modify any parking in this area.Therefore,this standard does not apply. 3. The minimum tree canopy standards for the site and any off-street vehicle parking areas are provided in Section 18.420.060. Tree canopy standards are addressed in Section 18.420.060 of this decision.This standard is met E. Pedestrian access. 1. Paths must provide safe and convenient pedestrian access from public sidewalks abutting the site to all required building entrances on the site. A minimum of 1 path is required for every 200 linear feet of street frontage. 2. Paths must provide safe and convenient pedestrian access within the site between all buildings, uses, and areas designed for use by pedestrians. Paths within parking areas or along drive aisles are subject to additional standards in Subsection 18.410.040.B. 3. Paths must extend to the perimeter property line to provide access to existing or planned pedestrian facilities on adjacent properties,such as trails or public access easements,where practicable. The applicant proposes minor additions to the eastern facade of the existing industrial building, which includes adding a new canopy over the building's main entrance,with a ramp, stairs,and pathway directly adjacent to these new additions. The proposed improvements only impact a portion of the overall site. The remainder of the site is legally non-conforming in regards to these pedestrian access standards. Adequate pedestrian access will be provided throughout the proposed improvements,and the remainder of the site will not become further out of conformance with these standards. Additionally, the Building Official will review the applicant's proposal for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) at the time of building permit submittal. These standards are met. 4. Paths must be constructed with a hard surface material and have a minimum unobstructed width of 5 feet. The applicant's plans illustrate that the proposed pathway will be constructed of concrete,and will have an unobstructed width of at least 5 feet. This standard is met. MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 3 18.410 Off-Street Parking and Loading: 18.410.070 Vehicle Parking Quantity Standards A. Off-street parking requirements. The ratios for providing minimum and maximum vehicle parking spaces are provided in Table 18.410.3. If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than 6 parking spaces for a development with less than 1,000 square feet of floor area,the development is allowed up to 6 parking spaces.If application of the maximum parking standard results in less than 10 vehicle parking spaces for a development between 1,000 and 2,000 square feet,the development is allowed up to 10 vehicle parking spaces. The applicant proposes to reconfigure and restripe the existing on-site parking lot, in order to accommodate the proposed building additions, and one (1) new ADA-accessible parking space. The subject site contains an existing 41,159-square-foot building that is currently occupied by an industrial services use. The applicant's proposed additions will not increase the floor area of the existing building. Industrial services has a minimum off-street parking requirement of 0.8 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of floor area (Table 18.410.3).Accordingly,the total minimum off-street parking requirement for the development site is 33 spaces.Staff reviewed the applicant's site plan to confirm there is adequate parking at the development site,with 42 spaces provided. This standard is met. 18.420 Landscaping and Screening: 18.420.060 Tree Canopy Standards A. Site tree canopy standards,which are stated as a percentage of effective tree canopy cover for an entire site, are provided in UFM Section 10, Part 3, Subparts N and O. Parking lot tree canopy standards are provided below. The applicant is applying for a minor modification to an existing nonresidential development.The applicant proposes to remove all existing trees on the site and in the parking lot,and to plant new trees,all of which are identified on the City of Tigard's Urban Forestry Manual (UFM) Native Tree List. Accordingly, tree canopy standards for the site and for the parking lot apply to this proposal,and are addressed in the findings below. B. An urban forestry plan is required to demonstrate compliance with site and parking lot tree canopy standards and must meet the requirements of UFM Sections 10 through 13. An urban forestry plan must: 1. Be coordinated and approved by a project landscape architect or project arborist, i.e. a person that is both a certified arborist and tree risk assessor, except that land partitions may demonstrate compliance with effective tree canopy cover and soil volume requirements by planting street trees in open soil volumes only; The applicant submitted an urban forestry plan that was coordinated and approved by a certified arborist and tree risk assessor, Todd Prager of Teragan &Associates, Inc. (the project arborist). This standard is met. 2. Demonstrate compliance with UFM tree preservation and removal site plan standards; The applicant submitted a tree removal site plan that meets UFM standards.A tree preservation site plan is not required because the applicant proposes to remove all existing trees on the site and in the parking lot. The project arborist included a signature of approval and statement attesting that the tree removal site plan meets all requirements in UFM Section 10,Part 1.This standard is met. 3. Demonstrate compliance with UFM tree canopy and supplemental report standards MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 4 and provide the minimum effective tree canopy cover, The applicant submitted a tree canopy site plan and supplemental report that meet UFM standards. In addition, the project arborist included a signature of approval and statement attesting that the tree canopy site plan and supplemental report meet all requirements in UFM Section 10,Parts 2 and 3. The subject site is zoned I-L; accordingly, the minimum required effective tree canopy for the overall development site is 25 percent(UFM Section 10,Part 3,Subsection N).Through the supplemental report, the project arborist demonstrates how the effective tree canopy for the entire site is 30 percent.This standard is met. 4. Demonstrate compliance with parking lot tree canopy standards,where applicable, by providing the minimum effective tree canopy cover of 30 percent for all parking areas,including parking spaces and drive aisles.Only the percentage of tree canopy directly above parking areas may count toward meeting this standard; and The existing parking lot only contains 20 percent tree canopy coverage,as detailed in the project arborist's supplemental report.The applicant proposes to remove all existing parking lot trees,and plant new parking lot trees,all of which are identified on the UFM Native Tree List.The proposed modifications will provide 25 percent parking lot tree canopy coverage. Although this is less than the required 30 percent parking lot tree canopy coverage,staff finds the applicant's proposal will bring the site closer to conformance with this minimum requirement, and is therefore approvable.This standard is met. 5. Include street trees where right-of-way improvements are required by Chapter 18.910, Improvement Standards. a. The minimum number of required street trees is determined by dividing the length in feet of the site's street frontage by 40 feet. When the result is a fraction, the minimum number of street trees is the nearest whole number. More than the minimum number of street trees may be required along the site's frontage depending upon the stature of trees chosen and the specific spacing standards for the chosen trees. The site's total street frontage along SW Hunziker Road is 247.48;therefore,this site is required to provide a minimum of six (6) street trees (247.48 feet divided by 40 feet, rounded to the nearest whole number). The applicant's tree canopy site plan and supplemental report show that 10 street trees will be planted.This standard is met. b. Street trees must be planted within the right-of-way wherever practicable. Street trees may be planted a maximum of 6 feet from the right-of-way when planting within the right-of-way is not practicable as determined by the City Engineer. The applicant's tree canopy site plan shows that all proposed street trees along SW Hunziker Road will be planted on private property,less than six (6) feet from the public right-of-way.This standard is met. 18.510 Sensitive Lands: 18.510.020 Applicability E. Administrative sensitive lands review. 1. Administrative sensitive lands reviews within the special flood hazard area (excluding the floodway), drainageway, slopes that are 25 percent or greater, and unstable ground are processed through a Type I procedure, as provided in Section 18.710.050, for the following actions: a. The repair,reconstruction,or improvement of an existing structure or utility,the cost of MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 5 which is less than 50 percent of the market value of the structure prior to the improvement or the damage requiring reconstruction. b. Actions within the special flood hazard area: i. The construction of accessory structures up to 528 square feet in size;and ii. Any landform alternation involving up to 50 cubic yards of material. c. Actions within drainageways and slopes that are 25 percent or greater, and unstable ground: i. Minimal ground disturbances or landform alterations involving 10 to 50 cubic yards of material; and ii. Building permits for accessory structures that are 120 to 528 square feet in size. 2. The approval authority will approve, approve with conditions, or deny a sensitive land review application using the standards and approval criteria Sections 18.510.040,18.510.050, 18.510.070 and 18.510.080. City maps indicate that the adjacent property to the west contains a locally significant wetland, stream, and CWS vegetated corridor,and that these sensitive lands extend onto the subject property.The subject site is also located in the FEMA sperial flood hazard area, but is not located in the floodway. The applicant proposes minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations involving less than 50 cubic yards of material in the vegetated corridor and the special flood hazard area. The scope of work will not impact the locally significant wetland or stream.Accordingly, this proposal requires a sensitive lands review,and is being processed through a Type I procedure. The applicable standards and approval criteria are addressed in the findings below. 18.510.040 General Provisions for Special Flood Hazard Areas A. Review. The approval authority will review all applications to determine whether proposed building sites will minimize the potential for flood damage. B. Special flood hazard. The areas of special flood hazard identified by FEMA in a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study for Washington County, Oregon and Incorporated Areas effective October 19, 2018" with accompanying Flood Insurance Map is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. C. Base flood elevation data.When base flood elevation data has not been provided in compliance with Subsection 18.510.040.B, the approval authority will obtain, review and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal, state or other source, in order to administer Subsections 18.510.040.M and N. D. Test of reasonableness.Where elevation data is not available either through the flood insurance study or from another authoritative source,applications for building permits will be reviewed to assure that the potential for flood damage to the proposed construction will be minimized.The test of reasonableness is a local judgment and includes use of historical data,high water marks, photographs of past flooding,etc.,where available. Failure to elevate at least 2 feet above grade in these sensitive land areas may result in higher insurance rates. E. Resistant to flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, must be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. F. Minimize flood damage. All new construction and substantial improvements, including manufactured homes, must be constructed using methods and practices that minimize flood damage. The subject site is located in the FEMA special flood hazard area, but is not located in the floodway. The applicant proposes minor additions to the existing industrial building on site,and minor modifications to on-site parking,landscaping, and trees. MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 6 > The Eb.MA Flood Map shows that the subject site is located in Zone A.According to FEMA's definitions, Zone A represents, "areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event generally determined using approximate methodologies.Because detailed hydraulic analyses have not been performed, no Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) or flood depths are shown." Since base flood elevation data is not available, staff has utilized the test of reasonableness to review the applicant's proposal for potential flood damage. Because the proposed building additions are exterior only (new exterior deck, canopy, and cladding), and will be constructed with durable, weather resistant materials that are intended for exterior use,staff finds that the potential for flood damage to the proposed additions will be minimized. Additionally, the applicant is not proposing to install any new utility equipment. These standards are met. I. Anchoring.All new construction,all manufactured homes and substantial improvements must be anchored to prevent flotation,collapse,or lateral movement of the structure. The applicant states that all proposed building additions will be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement This standard is met. M. Nonresidential construction. New construction and substantial improvement of any commercial, industrial, or other nonresidential structure must either have the lowest floor, including basement,elevated to the level of the base flood elevation,or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities,must: 1. Be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; Since base flood elevation data is not available for the subject site,staff has utilized the test of reasonableness to review the applicant's proposal, and determined that the potential for flood damage to the proposed additions will be minimized. This standard is met. 2. Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; The applicant states that all proposed building additions will have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads,and effects of buoyancy.This standard is met. 3. Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the design and methods of construction are in compliance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Such certifications must be provided to the building official as provided in Paragraph 18.510.030.E.2;and Compliance with the standard outlined above will be reviewed by the Building Official at the time of building permit submittal.This standard will be met. 4. Nonresidential structures that are elevated,not floodproofed,must meet the same standards for space below the lowest floor as described in Paragraph 18.510.040.L.2.Applicants flood- proofing nonresidential buildings must be notified that flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are 1 foot below the floodproofed level (e.g., a building constructed to the base flood level will be rated as 1 foot below that level). The applicant states that the project contains one(1) foundation area below the lowest floor that is enclosed. MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 7 The applicant also states that the foundation's design meets the standards in Section 18.510.040.L.2 because it will have a minimum of two (2) openings having a total net area of not less than one (1) square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding. Additionally, the applicant states the proposed foundation openings will be no higher than one (1) foot above grade, and that the openings will include screens that will permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters.This standard is met. 18.510.070 Sensitive Lands Applications B. Within the special flood hazard area. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions an application for sensitive lands review within the special flood hazard area when all of the following criteria are met: 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title; As demonstrated through the findings in this decision, the applicant's proposal is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this Title.This standard is met. 2. Land form alterations must preserve or enhance the special flood hazard area storage function and maintenance of the zero-foot rise floodway must not result in any encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development unless certified by a registered professional engineer that the encroachment will not result in any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge; a. If in the floodway and no-rise requirement is met, the development will comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions. The subject site is located in the FEMA special flood hazard area,but is not located in the floodway.The applicant proposes minor modifications to on-site parking, landscaping, and trees, which will result in minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations involving less than 50 cubic yards of material.The applicant submitted an analysis of the proposal's expected impact on the base flood level, prepared by registered professional engineer Deborah A.Beck of White Pelican Consulting,LLC(the project engineer). The project engineer determined there will be no change in the base flood level during base flood discharge as a result of the proposed site modifications.This standard is met. 3. Land form alterations or developments within the special flood hazard area are allowed only in areas designated as commercial or industrial on the comprehensive plan land use map, except that alterations or developments associated with community service uses, utilities, or public support facilities are allowed on residentially zoned properties subject to applicable zoning standards; The subject site designated as Light Industrial on the Tigard Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. This standard is met. 4. Where a land form alteration or development is allowed to occur within the special flood hazard area it will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood; As detailed in the analysis submitted by the applicant,the project engineer determined that the proposed site modifications will not result in any increase in the water surface elevation of the 100-year flood.This standard is met. D. Within drainageways. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions an application for a sensitive lands review within drainageways when all of the following criteria are met: MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 8 1. Compliance with all of the applicable requirements of this title; As demonstrated through the findings in this decision, the applicant's proposal is in compliance with all applicable requirements of this Title.This standard is met. 2. The extent and nature of the proposed land form alteration or development will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use; 3. The proposed land form alteration or development will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation,ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property; 4. The water flow capacity of the drainageway is not decreased; The applicant proposes to modify landscaping and plant new trees in the vegetated corridor, adjacent to a locally significant wetland and stream. This proposal will create minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations involving less than 50 cubic yards of material.Staff has reviewed the applicant's materials, and determined that the proposal will not create site disturbances to an extent greater than that required for the use,will not result in erosion, stream sedimentation, ground instability, or other adverse on-site and off-site effects or hazards to life or property, and will not decrease the water flow capacity of the adjacent wetland or stream. These standards are met. 5. Where natural vegetation has been removed due to land form alteration or development,the areas not covered by structures or impervious surfaces will be replanted to prevent erosion in compliance with CWS"Design and Construction Standards"; The applicant is not proposing to remove any natural vegetation as part of this proposal.This standard does not apply. 6. The drainageway will be replaced by a public facility of adequate size to accommodate maximum flow in compliance with Clean Water Services requirements and the city's adopted stormwater master plan; This proposal will not decrease the water flow capacity of the adjacent wetland or stream. This standard does not apply. 7. The necessary U.S.Army Corps of Engineers and State of Oregon Land Board,Division of State Lands, and CWS approvals must be obtained; The applicant obtained a sensitive area pre-screening site assessment from CWS for the proposed work in the vegetated corridor (CWS file no. 20-002143). CWS determined that the project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive areas found near the site.The applicant was not required to obtain approvals from the United States Army Corps of Engineers or the Oregon Department of State Lands for this proposal.This standard is met. 8. Where land form alterations or development are allowed within and adjacent to the special flood hazard area,the city will require the consideration of dedication of sufficient open land area within and adjacent to the special flood hazard area in compliance with the comprehensive plan. This area will include portions of a suitable elevation for the construction of a pedestrian or bicycle pathway within the special flood hazard area in compliance with the adopted pedestrian bicycle pathway plan. The applicant proposes minimal ground disturbances or land form alterations in the vegetated corridor MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 9 and the special flood hazard area. However, dedication of open land area is not required as part of this application.This standard does not apply. 18.765 Modifications: 18.765.060 Minor Modifications A. Definition.A minor modification has the following characteristics: 1. It has minimal impacts on surrounding properties,sensitive lands,or public facilities; and The applicant proposes minor additions to an existing industrial building at 8015 SW Hunziker Road, and minor modifications to on-site parking,landscaping,and trees.As demonstrated in the findings above, the applicant's proposal complies with all applicable development standards for the I-L Zone,as well as the applicable standards for parking,landscaping, tree canopy,and sensitive lands.Accordingly, staff finds this proposal will have minimal impacts on surrounding properties, sensitive lands, or public facilities, and meets the definition of a minor modification. 2. It does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard or further out of conformance if already nonconforming, except where an adjustment has been approved. As demonstrated in the findings above, the applicant's proposal complies with all applicable development standards for the I-L Zone, as well as the applicable standards for parking, landscaping, tree canopy, and sensitive lands. Furthermore,this proposal does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standard. D. Approval criteria. The approval authority will approve or approve with conditions a minor modification application when all of the following criteria are met: L The proposed modification qualifies as a minor modification as defined in Subsection 18.765.060.A; As demonstrated in the findings above, this proposal qualifies as a minor modification as defined in CDC 18.765.060.A.This criterion is met. 2. If the proposal involves the modification of a condition of approval, at least one of the following criteria is met: a. The condition cannot be implemented for reasons outside the control of the applicant or property owner; b. The condition is no longer needed or warranted because circumstances have changed; or c. A new or modified condition better accomplishes the purpose of the original condition. The applicant is not proposing to modify a condition of approval.This criterion does not apply. CONCLUSION: This proposal qualifies as a minor modification to an existing development, as defined in CDC 18.765.060.A, and is in compliance with all applicable standards of this Title. SECTION V. PROCEDURE AND APPEAL INFORMATION Notice: Notice was provided to: MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 10 X The applicant and owner Final Decision: This minor modification and sensitive lands review have been processed through a Type I procedure.As such, this decision is final for purposes of appeal on the date it is mailed or otherwise provided to the applicant, whichever occurs first. This decision is not appealable locally and is the final decision of the City. re-A"--THIS DECISION IS FINAL ON AUGUST 19, 2020, AND BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 20, 2020 Questions: If you have any questions,please contact Lina Smith at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@tigard-or.gov. `T"...-' �`"`s^— August 19,2020 APPROVED BY: Lina Smith, Assistant Planner Community Development Director's Designee MMD2020-00023 Fred Shearer&Sons,Inc. 11 APPROVED CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE linacs , 14:00:10, 08/19/2020 :OAen;9 5US156d57I T - - - - - - — ""— - - - - - - - - --I 1 I / r mew i ! /-- m°.r. •N ir es,Emn jam, _.�. ..,, ro ..oREaw ,�/ iy�eN°.x ra°,ox.r. N5 ] / orwx 671...m. ai ux°w.+.°.x36 roxw.x --�`� .a.JVE W..e VxWu10.Rf .xw 63 i e"in`mrOnou."o"v`r`.'nPXNO1D SUBMITTED FOR r jams ea"wu°rocµwxw.rix.x E , / mbeMe1C4CK WSW .rox..w�R1°w LAND USE NOT FOR u 6,o "� ,., "m5 `�V ---�;F i CONSTRUCTION ' , I 1,: FS&S Bldg Renovation P\\P am wm.w Svex rhw.E.0 m 5\sEe Am. r Mord.On aRaa i -/ m XVO66'.°.E'°x. i IDii _i__ 4011"illhilIrS1-1 ' 11111111.111111k N— _ rr.n-i�J mx+aRE+o eexw. 6 SITE PLAN- ..+.r m.oC wvr.en.o.euw. EXISTING I DEMO - i mxmmx.roxewi.- (El..MxEMI,°lit x. se.,. -._ IA0.01 r ouxo Nry an. mxmr.s.a m.° v. .. r.r.xn 701 65 1 Site Plan Existing I Demolition .®se ET0675 CIII, I 1°i 20' ,..A 1 Juno 29.2D20 CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE Pugx].Eee.¢.ST0019/1aASE 911001,9000901 9SR SW 1B11 fire ...V... v sPrw Fcoo Poniard.ORBR1e 0771374 wPcanoc 5039750.0e'n LOT K. 81.21.SF ne,ase,e.m,,,,,,".K.a s.,.s P.aonoeumowvv.OE. en1a SF 0nescnras1OPwHo.R P.A"s"sos.Us169 aeon °nwu.sr..w.+c.a.s. ¢mi. K`�N TWOmFFro ARE IWO TOINWN Arm. .I70 eP sE F.RwovOO,a a701.1.61100060 .a.wzRwO vr..Pwwc SUMS 9oRco REDEVELOPED ME X,MN,SPACE TO P.n"RsOes.wlwL WEI T.RE e0T" Oven .ssw rcmneau `�/ `l___ &OE PROM,— - - - - — - - - - — r .P I/ 1 I :� ' / r srvs '// r s i TeeRs TNEW"a a:o °:wA E: L/ ' \ / 1 / �j0/ 1�Yn� .M� A,o i / g 1091030104 W /'/ r / .,nw roOO.Oro0OPRPw Eoaiw,Oroar''''' roa ''''n �-I I"x— o,s ,,, "ICAL "ro " v. SUBMITTED FOR 71 / 1 / TPw"v ew.. ,OR •a..R.Onmw. 1 LANDUSEREVIEW- m,awnmacICES Rar`cu.m 1 ',MI FPuxRm*aw / I ___ _ "` I NOT FOR 1 —�+{ 1 __ ',M Bte1EP/�'O R 1,19 CONSTRUCTION / / ACE L c :34100' OKrcon.rcR.wOsur. F Ell t i1 ° J` � I ,SNP M$,rcd o CD P.ree TORewe, / ; 1 � TpRrd OR WPZi /-� C11/ — Ij \ / `v J/ `a v :: cSTT �1 / \ j P s. 1 — — .RM R,.Pwmaem01.101,103•01.11 I - : —+n —_-- —__-- —___ pi SRE PLAN- .++.+—� S PROPOSED f --_ mu .�RF.P0..o.b MO LAWSLAR1I6 KALE A0.02 .STR100,119•4090T996 09,0 1 Site Plan-Proposed saFOsvn1i.'dieSR`S 1 20 &JUne 239 2020 `.Y.`.`aa,a 2EeeunP,BMK.eeco,.Be9e CHRISTIE ,,.,a9..TOBel,91 ,IEolo.as.w. MENA sff ARCHITECTURE an ef _ 9532 SW IBA Place se PoBIana SR 97219 Aee 603-26666P xe a95 R0 m1 e Ps. NTe.enoe Mu ub3l spew.. 0,50.4NIO5CA13E PEW: Re®se I0TNI04001TEe....Oln*Msaw0:: 1PN 99 pa.VPMIP® T5.1.01IPL RPRM BT 8 W NL8MB T �- l I ' I \ it it - - 1 �.; % 1 l ''' I �° ` ' - _ 1 Ia SUBMITTED FOR \ LAND USE REVIEW- i \ .wsa m enCAS NEFER vtn�oTneeV..wuEnToneBux I NOT FOR 1 /- I I6 CONSTRUCTION V 6. Iea.ee mew ac ISIPOIS Mr..Steel alp..OW 92323 _I ___ ueB9UaEomu — — — t SITE PLAN- x"" --- -- a` LANDSCAPING AO.03 15 ePlan-Landscaping aoa cnu le • : , _20 I June 29.2020 .. •...ti.Lo..a..<.R4[w..w..E E.6T.4 IEEE...,,6R. CHRISTIE M w.1.1.4 wTy1.AEEa,w.0214 se.. SASE 9=9 oven E.•1.4.�roff RE.d,E• X ,—•A•1E, ,PEE. .... w.E,W1 ..4.6 .r6,. MM... [4..%Eo, F...6Lw ARCHITECTURE w S wu,.w.„wEE..wP..�awEE..L...�o6EL,E.o.Ee SWIM. .�w.E essz SW lath Place MSS. a4 IVE - E TxFe err..dT E90ER�.ncu,n ATrom wa E.FFIaw MI. 111E Pa-Rne.OR.219 E.AAE 11.E on.,APES. I 1 Ecwanwrrsw111 la.4 LOm bU. SS'' 4reEmw ..V a0}]56-66T1 vrsTu4wrER °I'•'A"'uVE6Er'r.Ecxe[.wKx6 LorwrowoEwVl. S.M. .e9[ VxmOSWINn 0.101.1.1.001.0 1uRE.: .1.113w 1' 1..5E Roans V .151904010 iOi.S ORE P V MIME iV [aB[NLNt MI V REMJK 00 E4 4xs1rn 1.0.1El E..'Mw%GAWP v 0AKR...RED a ECRU V V .4 aV GINw,GVhn.TE..YVOFYxRrtY OJYFM.... I..UYE II�,', 6RF,R¢tlMryfdER.fF 941E ..4 ESC sorer. _ d� Mt w Al E A a A 4 lW4E 9IESK.. .p1.V4 WOK SOA sees >aEE.dd.OE C4K.00.119E: PEES V1 i �R II............,..... T4FNi. 1¢w4 6.EV / ' I o 11.1010110 --------- ------------------ / ; / i / ' %/ "N, T-- / SUBMITTED FOR %' .-1-,-_ `n / LAND USE NOT FOR IEW- r' -'-44- CONSTRUCTION tE` / Ali ILJII I. 'mni {O !,_-61 r._ _--- jj ` `{_`_ , �+-`�--- >:\ 1 il , FS&S Bldg Renovation y ' \X --1 �! 1 11 / ly y\I \ \ 1 I Tye.,OR S 223 1`/ G� I19.]p�9W ' IA. I,.x', L�_III✓j I 60.M RIVV __ I 1 1jt AI 1l g ...,_,,r.... ______.....__ _____sz___________.___________1..:_______1_____;______L___:,__;..A\L--.:\:. :-::::-.::::',/ _ : ,. 3 ~' "-- i Taw..ra99r1.01 ,.s, I Tree Nan- s Existing l DemolRgn of mEnEa.mommar4sEe= r ` 6RaR INME. I A0.04 i6w GR14ER.0 .MY4n6[ .Cg505 9RR9wW BPoI1MLm Tree Plan-Existing/Demolition \ ./ aIEERlaxvla,/ 1,_.a ,June 29.son goo.°.®,w9pswars PR,.aa®Styr TREE°.Na..9am0.as .RasOra..RW9LE.Tr00MN.aa0NRM4 ammo... MELT 11-1E TO •;,� W„Im Wm. -6N0^ MO CHRISTIE MAIM TREES TR 19unu°i- SSM.REPUNTED IN ACCanDIACEWI i11ir.MF GNNAAInI.Sll01arm...use w*0 OF .R,NO a019 A alas 2TLLu1.U.vxa WTXIf AQcub.v.RIA ,.tea. 1REE, d. JE . .M10 .Aa.nrlaA 0000WLnnwr0E5 L''O0°oxo°rDVpi1Eim EumuwauEcamw INE aomomLm. ....WET..c0n.,c0NPa. wr ISEeT...I m�M w NCANOPY '"N. •AN.'i ler •••" ARCHITECTURE ma..vacs swor.haws.REaulOses o oars saa maw.wow..G moll wa . cweRwe: e.. _ WnNEuwwwLmEs.LL YEAHeYCIL.weR , .Ia ONRNSIORRETE0.Wi9E...ARFIREE8 Wv1elEE°E°FOR T.CYIV. me...woes NOT...WI ..LOT SURFACE Am ARualwl TOE l4wTNIom ox user. I. yIR of _111E PROPER _110 [wKlE NA ME wwuB,ORwnh mr,,,vRovERIaEE,woneut lg.,...I anY MR SW 18 mleRCueMwROauPueEv.wA PMlend 01187219 ED 111c.3.151{,11,W 1..semwE160,0...OW1141.roRnaR.NO TALL TREES EL.RIE FOR lanwlrvE wpm oeen r UNYELLM.WR. IYl®1nuRW0LO.NI.R0. nee rlr teas EwmrN OF eaee.a a avalw,woa..x.saa AL VRmmER tee TREE°Iww wvelARE. EHTIE.APIIW LmAW 9NNwlx. macros _ seearse bdilss66Tr a new wawa., MY Iv0 T0E ME.r VITALMOF e TOW aFUHIN.,WCAn:EIMMN.HRu1N9E V.010 LOMEH E0.PEAOVEANYU1UR OF WOO IWWX.M uMVW Cua}'ICOSERReg0RE0 M. - aamY N wNa3A Imo- Y Ylas Yr 05 I.ucl¢BGM..UWwYC.M10.M}9.Pe ESC0IE0UK➢BW010110 CIA,OE0CEIrt OW,y..,..,,,,,TRe 0.1..4 n., SMY Q. Off aa OVER MEmv.TaCEeE..PRE>TD uW 1AHe[c°Iaw.gwcu PAM..9u,..Ua BmLYrvRES..0 1...,Ate.mEanv aiR Ulvn Lml Ir1Ei USE ABACXMOETOIUw W.TO]108,11/.LEE0E0 .n*ua°E RED9u0 LOOSE,NCORPg4IE*E 0C0.UEudev,. RRSMM r r Cw0M01*SalITMM.O.MEP.P.MIGL OfRE9Mn9003010 i°WCERHMI TOO...SUFE15E.I.wO Il./ER T/1E{gIE.OM'PEVAPEI.Ex16ME COM,WILD 091D owww wse Or 'W E61°`EOF wYIIE EWES m P.M P 0 Al WALLS.Do N0111L70 A°Faro GREATER TERM 114E BOTTOM O..00nN1. mgr. _ .FTP1Mw11 1ra0ADTOfy0.9ND AM>5MCIE9Ofv.M..KR OROMIC WENCRBR OVER TM.PMEE BOO mum+nu TO... L0W0R1011110NOE100 N nE C-NT°T9FILK9WL°%1O...ORM ,BOY wse rat .xYI°SIU ICwev0R TIE...gyp LOimee O.Ib,W R c , �� WYrr9 ceaERSFaa.TIEEroeNIwsW. wawa...Tr..LIoe.ESTNE wannnuww. LIM,,,, w1E HMF BH Com,,, 9MC11G AU PANG u TREE To UNDEPORotil. wan... eft rsa7e we sr wEmEERDNE _ X .... 0 R = .C.` III .a51RM.1 IRN.IBOXNCERIER .1,�Ero..EHNR..,,, *� wTNu TREE ESWTMtW TFR I a IR.IEd. GARRYNM sCu ua ualNw 100 l <FMFRT NN RPE.XMM. RRY ea isa SF ea. we SF ROR VBJi m Oa1N111E WR f:oor M a9Nm09.uRARv 10.18 RbNY .a9Nv RRaWa — - - - - — - - - - • - - - - �- arson.rums use — —J � T a ER .e ■ 1/147 -- 4111, 11 A / • -___� I lavmns ip; . -,,, _Ell__. • i I �9 / db / IMII ` • SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW- / NOTFOR y CONSTRUCTION x 1 T _f_i_l__i___ Y/ �.uminlli-..' a-�L �,�_ '"IA - / ; /per; 6.146. FS85 Bldg Renovation tin=r ,____7 T • Pseud.OR 811223 Br1� IIRI�� • rr..ular�.. j I,_�- la BOLINMI.. �d L • — ems y-----� iniammi�,� """— �LTowl.,,,,,r.wTTHN f Tree man_ Proposed MG....7 v -E3ow E��a n 1 , 1 1-=20' Tree Plan-Proposed sc. r=m i June 29.2020 O T T (f) p CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 9522 SW loth P530 Oor5a,µ OR 9Y219 303156-66]i iM<M.EIEELEV.1Fd OF I IE2 EAST ME.W£YMTPTO Mtpummu MO Mg \ 7 TMEE=',.M,8 601650 WILL . O eC�EP. — v \ uIIiiiII ENVPEi I t uIgII MMSm OuS tiOMDD o" wy,.„Lon.. anti W t\ �\ nceNeN Me.Fl 4 ..,nnn. k1 Fe I EiII, eM ^ ,nrw MIM.. ®vanE. Ou T r \ , — ' sm w NIER[SOTEDGEplll vwl gC0005400 pNNOTMKMEiORFYYX '�« MR urt D}nlMrt WM enTRWL a mGloso.rva MM.. Building Elevation(East) O O O 0 O SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FS&S Bldg Renovation / STE.MACMCIRMFM 6sIS acd,OR 9722.3 Tgvtl,OR 9]3S3 uwi .,r�'I.,,iY __ _ ., suueEi.. sal•^twl" •WILL __ __ __ w 0.ETyr ®wMUE�3 --I V eruMM FlIME vlxuEs 9 <RUMS.... S.W.... -^T I BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1A0.06 2Building Elevation-Canopy(East) i 1'stc 1`a. "R"P I June 29.2020 T O O O CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 05929W 18A Race Ptl1a98.Oft 81219 $D}]5666]] noFlBPmra-row NNE Win Pos eCw90 wow atkssonla.$HE9 I�A5�Eq, MP w�E.cooce. oRnavvis .0 wn VMMK9C.a nov.60%i ✓m �p ��[[aKsv WI�V" H�IEIPWFeEYOM V Ny awOu Invmun oWw .va l.�ma1 AVIONO GAR MIL wx a nuEmu9E • 1, . F11PANT COM RAM NAL .7 v Nr m 0001C CLIPS.I, of mac rn I•STAFEDEEMR NORM nu,an wu+n. ...moos E.anumua9 wol.rawo LAP PAIL IDASHEDia r.wrrtlCW.crdlre wuawua w.veac REVISIONS 1 Building Elevation(South) 2Buiding Elevation(North) SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FS&S Bldg Renovation 0PPCEeL11.01.5wIItwo[CE EXTENSION n995 rwwd CANOPY Ci9arorla0W.w 6015 Nuraiker Steal firmwmIC 00 Eu5E e0aq arrow Ww i1 ry 9 Tigard, EFeoNMLEINE Nl e '\ `'��' 9SICESI FYa WE1N1119 p a' :: vie , SUP•WOAD C411.1ED aerate { BUILDING 5 ELEVATIONS `AO.07 4Building Elevation(East) Building Elevation(West) lop.9.P 3 Buildi....11 3 Juno 28.2020 APPLICANT MATERIALS Case #: MMD2020-00023 City of Tigard SLR2020-00002 p �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TIGARD Master Land Use Application LAND USE APPLICATION TYPE ❑ Accessory Dwelling Unit(ADU) ® Modification: ®Type I 0 Type II O Adjustment 0 Planned Development: 0 Annexation O Consolidated Plan ❑ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 0 Concept Plan 0 Conditional Use ❑ Detailed Plan 1 0 Downtown Development Review: ® Sensitive Lands Review: n Type I O Type IIType® Type O II O Type III O Adjustment ❑ Site Development Review: ❑ Type I O Type II O Home Occupation—Type II 0 Subdivision 0 Land Partition O Temporary Use Permit 0 Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation 0 Urban Forestry Plan: 0 Marijuana Facility Permit ❑ Modification O Discretionary Review ❑ Miscellaneous: 0 Zoning Map Amendment O Type ll 0 Type Ill PROJECT INFORMATION Project name: FS&S Building Renovation Brief description of project: . 1. Build 1015 sf of new impervious area that includes an exterior covered ramp and stair and an exterior covered deck.There is no increase to the internal square footage of the building. 2. Remove all trees on site;plant new trees that will improve both the parking tree coverage and the site tree coverage from what is existing. 3. Rearrange the existing parking lot to increase landscaped area and maintain current number of parking spaces. SITE INFORMATION Location (address if available): 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 Tax map and tax lot number(s): Tax ID Ii:2S101 BD00300 Tax Account It: R458695 Site size: 2.14 acres 93,218.4 SF Zone: IL-light industrial PR-Parks& Recreation APPLICANT INFORMATION Name: Lisa Christie Mailing address: 9532 SW 18th Place City/State: Portland/OR Zip: 97219 Phone: 503-490-5472 Email: Iisa@christiearchitecture.com Applicant's representative: Phone: Email: City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • wwwtigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 1 of 2 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION 0 Same as applicant (Attach list for additional owners) Name: 8015 Hunziker LLC Mailing address: 8015 SW Hunziker Road City/State: Tigard/OR Zip: 97223 Phone: 503-520-9991 Email: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS In addition to this application form,you must submit all required items listed in Subsection 18.710.030.0 of Tigard's Community Development Code. If you are unsure what is required with your application,please contact the planner on duty at 503-718-2421 or tigardplannerondutynu,tigard-or.gov. I certify that 1 am the property owner or I am eligible to initiate this application, as provided in the Tigard Community Development Code. To the best of my knowledge,all the information provided within this application package is complete and accurate. - Lisa Christie 6-8-2020 — p 'cant, ' nature Print name Date T...-i, Ralph Schultz 6-8-2020 Proper ner's s re* Print name Date /),� �_ John Park 6-8-2020 Prop owners signature* Print name Date *The owner must sign this application or submit a separate written authorization when the owner and applicant are different people. Additional Property Owner Information Owners of 8015 Hunziker LLC: John Park 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 503-520-9991 jm.park @ fredshearer.com Ralph Schultz 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 503-520-9991 r.schultz @fredshearer.com STAFF USP. ONLY Case No.:MM D2020-00023 Application fee: $1,171 Received by: I S Date: 6/1 1/20 Related Case(s): Determined complete by: LS Date: 7/27/20 City of Tigard • 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard,Oregon 97223 • www.tigard-or.gov • 503-718-2421 • Page 2 of 2 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: JJ TICOR TITLE" p a0s ington County.Oregon 2019-074134 Stn=61 N MEJIA 10/18/2019 10:20:11 AM 111 SW Columbia St.,Ste 1000 Portland,OR 97201 I,Richard Hobernlcht Director of Assessment and Taxation and Ex- GRANTOR'S NAME: officio County Clerk for Washington County,Oregon.do hereby Performance Contracting Group,Inc.,a Delaware corporation certify that the within instrument of writing was received and recorded in the book of records of said county. GRANTEE'S NAME: Richard Hobemicht,Director of 8015 Hunziker LLC,an Oregon limited liability company Assessment and Taxation,Ex-Officio AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Order No.: 36261905008-CW 8015 Hunziker LLC 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: 8015 Hunziker LLC 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard,OR 97223 APN: R458695 Map: 2S116D-00300 8015 SW Hunziker Road,Tigard,OR 97223 SPACE ABOVE THIS UNE FOR RECORDER'S USE STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED Performance Contracting Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Grantor, conveys and warrants to 8015 Hunziker LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantee, the following described real property,free and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Washington, State of Oregon: A tract of land situated in the W.W.Graham Donation Land Claim No.39,in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 1,Township 2 South,Range 1 West of the Willamette Meridian,in the City of Tigard,Washington County,Oregon,being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of the W.W.Graham Donation Land Claim No.39;thence South 83°02'20"East,along the Northerly line of said Donation Land Claim,a distance of 952.85 feet to a point CS" on the North line of said Donation Land Claim,South 82°50 East 163.02 feet from the Northwest corner of that tract of land conveyed to John F.Bryant by deed recorded May 19,1905,in Book 69,Page 335, Washington County Deed Records;thence South 08°25'09"West,along the East line of that tract of land conveyed by deed recorded as Document No.80030552,Washington County Deed Records,a distance ]�7c1�Jj of 618.76 feet to the true point of beginning of this description;thence South 08°25'09"West,continuing along said East line,a distance of 487.57 feet to the North right of way line of SW Hunziker Road,30.00 feet from centerline;thence North 61°00'53"West,along said right of way line,a distance of 236.28 feet to y,f a point that is 10.00 feet from,when measured at right angles to,the West line of that tract of land conveyed by Deed recorded in Document No.80030552,Washington County Deed Records;thence North 12°15'07"East,parallel to said West line,a distance of 383.46 feet;thence South 77°44'53"East a C distance of 5.00 feet to a point that is 15.00feet from,when measured at right angles to,the West line of CC,v that tract of land conveyed by Deed recorded in Document No.80030552,Washington County Deed Records;thence North 12'15'07"East,parallel to said West line,a distance of 35.00 feet;thence South 77°44'53"East a distance of 188.69 feet to the point of beginning a d TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress and egress as set forth in that certain Agreement dated September 28,1961,and recorded October 23,1961,in Book 451,Page 492,and also recorded May 15, 1967,in Book 641,Page 649,Washington County Deed Records,over and across the West 30 feet of m that property described in Deed recorded January 2, 1986,as Recorder's Fee No.86000497. CC Subject to: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL,AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010,TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES,AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE Deed(Statutory Warranty)Legal ORD1368.doc i Updated:04.26.19 Page 1 OR-TT-FNP.02743.473650.362B1905009 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED (continued) ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS,IF ANY,UNDER ORS 195,300,195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11,CHAPTER 424,OREGON LAWS 2007,SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND it 17,CHAPTER 855,OREGON LAWS 2009,AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7,CHAPTER 8,OREGON LAWS 2010. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have executed this document on the date(s)set forth below. Dated 11 Oa- 2-0I4 ;if a corporate grantor, it has caused its name to be signed by order of Its board of directors. Performan.- C.. g .r. , nc.,a Delaware corporation BY: , MIL Jason j ck 17.7 1 State of Kansas �' County of----�(7/q.us06 ^y This instrument was acknowledged before me on(' /c LesL / 7,2019 by Jason Hendricks as President of Performance Contracting Group,Inc.,a Delaware corporation. 4"" `"IVtrtar ublic-State of Kan s err DENEEN T.PEDERSON My Commission Expires: q/-s ,"0'�-Z a � .' aweoreau My APPL EJtp. 9�/' `� • • • Deed(Statutory Warranty)Legal ORO3369.doc/Updated:04.26.19 Page 2 OR-TT-FNPT-02743.473650-36261905009 EXHIBIT"A" Exceptions Subject to: 1_ Agreement,including the terms and provisions thereof, Executed by: Owners of the subject property and adjoining property Recording Date: October 23, 1961 Recording No.: Book 451,Page 492 Also recorded Recording Date: May 15, 1967 Recording No.: Book 641,Page 649 2. Unrecorded sewer easement,as disclosed by Warranty Deed Recording Date: August 24, 1972 Recording No.: Book 884,Page 224 3. Necessary slope easement,as set forth in Document Recording Date: September 15,1975 Recording No.: Book 1043,Page 971 4. Easement(s)for the purpose(s)shown below and rights incidental thereto,as granted in a document: Granted to: City of Tigard Purpose: Underground sewer line Recording Date: July 29,1976 Recording No: Book 1101,Page 308 : Affects: Southwesterly corner of subject property Re-Recorded Recording Date: September 9, 1976 Recording No.: Book 1111,Page 384 5. Easement(s)for the purpose(s)shown below and rights incidental thereto,as granted in a document: Granted to: Owner of adjoining property Purpose: Access Recording Date: March 25,1999 Recording No.: 99036045 • • • • • Deed(Statutory Warranty)Legal ORD1366 doc/Updated: 0426.19 Page 3 OR-11-FNPT-02743.473650-36261905006 CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE July 13, 2020 Narrative for Sensitive Lands Review(SLR)&Minor Modification (MMD) Project name Fred Shearer&Sons Exterior Building &Landscape Renovation Site Information Address: 8015 SW Hunziker Road Tigard, OR 97232 Zone: I-L Overlay: Sensitive Lands Site area: 93,218 sf Submitted Drawings A0.01 Site Plan - Existing/Demolition A0.02 Site Plan - Proposed A0.03 Site Plan - Landscaping A0.04 Tree Plan - Existing/Demolition A0.05 Tree Plan - Proposed A0.06 Building Elevations A0.07 Building Elevations Project Description This project involves an exterior renovation and addition to an existing industrial building. It also includes tree removal, tree planting, and new landscaping.The site is partially in a Sensitive Lands overlay. Renovation work includes: 1. 331 sf addition on the SW side of the building for a new exterior, covered deck. No new interior space. 2. 38 sf addition on the NE side of the building for new cladding. No new interior space. Does not touch the ground. 3. Removal of all trees and planting of new trees. The existing trees are in moderate to poor health and have been poorly pruned.The trees along the east property line conflict with existing underground utilities. The trees do not provide adequate site or parking lot tree canopy coverage. The proposed trees will not conflict with utilities and will greatly improve site and parking lot tree coverage. 4. Re-landscaping all existing and new landscaped areas. Increase to overall landscaped area. 5. Minor modifications to parking lot curbing and re-stripping of parking lot. No change to number of existing parking spaces. 6. No work in the Sensitive Lands overlay. Statement on uses Uses in the building and onsite include: Office: 14,521 sf Warehouse: 23,176 sf Exterior storage: 18,671 sf Exterior storage is for the storage of metal studs as well as a staging area for truck deliveries. "537 Sav t81h place portland oreaon 97219 503.490.547, www.christiearchitecture.com CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE Building coverage, landscaping. hardscapina. impervious area Existing Proposed Delta Existing Building Coverage 34,060 sf 34,060 sf New Building Coverage 369 sf Ramp&Canopy Coverage 686 sf Total Building Coverage 34,060 sf 35,115 sf + 1,055 sf Landscaped Area 13,982 sf 14,034 sf + 52 sf Hardscape/Parking Area 45,253 sf 44,069 sf - 1,184 sf Site Area 93,218 sf 93,218 sf 0 sf Total Impervious Area 79,313 sf 79,184 sf - 129 sf As is evident in the chart above,there is an overall decrease in impervious area and an increase to site landscaping. Response to Chapter 18.510.Sensitive Lands The proposed renovation work on this site is a minimum of 78'from the Sensitive Lands overlay line. There is no impact to the sensitive lands area as a result of this project. There is some proposed tree planting in the sensitive lands area(along Hunziker Street, SW corner of the site).The City of Tigard planners have already given verbal approval for tree planting in this area. 18.510.020.E Applicability Ground disturbance will be limited to 48.6 cubic yards of material and the project will be processed under a Type 1 procedure. (It should be noted that the new deck and ramp are cantilevered, so there is minimal ground disturbance.Also, the new entry walkway is a bridge connecting the ramp and building, so there is no ground disturbance under this area.) 18.510.040.C. Base Flood Elevation Data See attached report "Analysis of Expected Impact on Base Flood Level Due to Proposed Construction" dated July 9, 2020, by White Pelican Consulting. 18.510.040.E, Resistant to Flood Damage Proposed project is entirely exterior(no interior space), constructed with durable, weather resistant materials intended for exterior use. No exterior utility equipment is proposed for this project. 18.510.040.E Minimize Flood Damage Proposed project is entirely exterior using methods and practices consistent with constructing exterior structures. 18.510.040.1, Anchoring Proposed project is anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure. 9532 sw 18th place portland oregon 97219 503.490.5472 www.christiearchitecture.com CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 18.510.040.M. Nonresidential Construction 18.510.040.M.1, Proposed project has no spaces below base flood level to waterproof. 18.510.040.M.2, Proposed project has structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. 18.510.040.M.3, Proposed project is certified by a registered professional engineer that the design and methods of construction are in compliance with accepted standards of practice for meeting provisions of this subsection based on their development or review of the structural design, specifications and plans. Se18.510.040.M.4, Proposed project contains one foundation area that is enclosed. Proposed foundation design includes a minimum of 2 openings having a total net area of not less than 1 square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding.The proposed foundation openings are no higher than 1 foot above grade and include screens that allow automatic entry and exit of flood waters. Response to Chapter 18.765. Modifications 18.765.060 Minor Modifications This project qualifies as a'minor modification' because it does not cause the development to go out of conformance with any applicable standards or further out of conformance if already unconforming. The project will be processed through a Type I procedure. 9532 sw 18th place portland oregon 97219 503 490.5472 www.christiearchitecture.com CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE Response to Chapter 18.330, Industrial Zone Development Standards 18.330.040 Development Standards The existing building and all proposed modifications will meet all development standards. Setbacks: Existing building and new additions meet all setback requirements(front 30', 0' at other property lines). Maximum Lot Coverage: 85% Lot size: 93,218 sf 93,218 x .85 Max coverage allowed: 79,235 sf Proposed building coverage: 35,115 sf(includes eaves&covered entries) Minimum Landscaped Area: 15% Lot size: 93,218 sf 93,218 x .15 Min landscaped area: 13,983 sf Proposed landscaped area: 14,034 sf(The existing landscaped area is 13,905 sf.) All landscaping will be planted to the L-2 standard. The service areas, transformers, air handling units, etc will not be changed. There are no proposed changes to the screening of these areas. 9532 sw 18th place portland oregon 97219 503.490.5472 www.christiearchitecture.com CHRISTIE ARCHITECTUR Response to Chapter 18.420, Landscaping and Screening 18.420.030 General Provisions Sixteen(16)existing trees on site are proposed to be removed. Nineteen (19) new trees are proposed to be planted. Site tree canopy coverage will be increased from 18% of site area to 30% of site area.The required minimum coverage for this site is 25%, so this requirement will be met. Parking lot tree canopy coverage will be increased from 20% of site area to 25% of site area.The required minimum coverage for parking lot trees on this site is 30%, so this requirement will not be met. However,the project does not involve reconfiguring the parking lot or significantly redeveloping the site. The project increases the amount of tree coverage for the parking lot over the existing conditions. Additionally, properly sized trees have been chosen for the existing conditions. Smaller trees will be planted under the power lines, preventing future poor pruning. Large trees will take advantage of the area with no power lines.Additionally, the new trees will be planted so as not to conflict with the existing underground utilities. See Arborist's Report for further information. 18.420.040, Landscaping Standards All landscaping will be planted to the L-2 standard. 18.420.050. Screening Standards The service areas,transformers, air handling units, etc will not be changed. There are no proposed changes to the screening of these areas. 18.420.060.Tree Canopy Standards See response under General Provisions above and Arborist's Report. Response to Chapter 18.410.Off-Street Parking&Loading 18.410.040 General Design Standards All spaces will meet the design standards and dimensions as required by this chapter. 18.410.050 Bicycle Parking Design Standards There are currently no bicycle parking spaces on site. Four spaces are required per Table 18.410.3. Four spaces will be provided and will meet the design standards as required by this chapter. 18.410.070 Vehicle Parking Quantity Standards Off-street parking and loading will not be significantly impacted by this proposal.There are currently 42 parking spaces on site.33 spaces are required by code.The parking lot will be re-striped and 42 spaces will be maintained. 9532 sw 18th place portland oregon 97219 503.490.5472 www.christiearchitecture.com :� White Pelican Consulting, LLC '� `, Environmental Engineering& Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified# 12223 JULY 9, 2020 8015 SW HUNZIKER RD Analysis of Expected Impact on Base Flood Level Due to Proposed Construction PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: Christie Architecture White Pelican Consulting, LLC 9532 SW 18th Place Deborah Beck P.E. Portland, OR 97219 PO BOX #33946 (503) 490-5472 Portland, OR 97292 (503) 847-9455 �0�9 PRopt,, &4& c,*G I N fc47 '3 t o���Rq Hi, ,0F� . EXPIRES: /l )1/2/ dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com White Pelican Consulting LLC 41:10Y!,i,ea„ uiting Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified It 12223 Project Summary Site improvements at 8015 SW Hunziker Rd Tigard,OR 97232 (site) have been proposed to be added to to the existing industrial building located at site. The improvements include an exterior renovation, addition of a covered deck,addition of a covered access ramp and stairs, and re-landscaping of the site. The site is located inside a FEMA defined 100 year flood zone and falls under the requirements of City of Tigard Code Sections 18.510.070.B.2 and 4 that specify that the base flood level cannot be raised as a result of proposed construction. This report examines the two approaches expected to cause the most impact on the base flood level. The first approach looked at the additional stormwater that would be added to flood waters during a 100-year rain event and the second approach looked at displacement of volume of flood waters and possible rise of the base flood level resulting from the volume of space occupied by the new construction. Summary of Proposed Changes of Impervious Area on the site A list of proposed changes of impervious areas on the site is below and the areas in square footage of each change is listed in Table 1. • 331 sq.ft. addition on the SW side of the building for a new exterior, covered deck. Of this, 210 sq.ft of the addition is the footing. • 38 sq. ft. addition on the NE side of the building for new cladding. Cladding starts 18inch above ground. • 686 sq.ft. addition on the S side of the building for a new ramp and stairs with canopy coverage. Only 252 sf of this section is the ramp and stairs. • Re-landscaping all existing and new landscaped areas. Increase to overall landscaped area. • Minor modifications to parking lot curbing and re-stripping of parking lot. No change to number of existing parking spaces. Table 1:Building coverage,landscaping, hardscaping, impervious area in sq.ft. Existing Proposed Delta Existing Building Coverage 34,060 34,060 New Building Coverage 369 Ramp&Canopy Coverage 686 Total Building Coverage 34,060 35,115 +1055 Landscaped Area 13,982 14,034 +52 Hardscape/Parking Area 45,253 44,069 -1184 Site Area 93,218 93,218 - Total Impervious Area 79,313 79,184 -129 dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsultinuu.com 1 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 `°'""e White Pelican Consulting, LLC hchcan Consulting Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Site Location within FEMA Base Flood Map The site is located inside a FEMA defined 100 year flood zone. Figure 1 shows the location of the site and the boundaries of the base flood level [1]. FEMA defines the flood hazard areas shown on the FEMA flood maps as Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA).SFHAs are defined as the area that will be inundated by the flood event having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The 1- percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or 100-year flood. The site is located in SFHA zone A as shown in Figure 2.The section of Zone A that the site is located in is connected to another zone A to the north by a culvert under Hwy 217, and connected to the flood zones around Fanno Creek to the south after going under the railroad.The sections of the base flood to the north of Hwy 217 and the south of the railroad were not included in the calculations. However, as the flood zones are connected,an even lower impact would be expected on the flood waters. ... s il-a- -i 1 }' L , • r i"- ?• 8015 SW ♦''��j�� " it"• Hunziker Rd '-- .. � Sots '• - tls"fl•"4 —,{ '- - N. t� 3 ` 'f'i. Y J . r f t/ r i S , X ;g ,. tom; V4i 4 L _ --� (f Q/,.,Y _ ,. h + i.. 1. • �''�� .. -.} {irOli t .: ar— Klk i^. ♦ -9010. s dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 2 PO BOX#33946 Portland,OR 97292 ,'►, H White Pelican Consulting, LLC ,.making 1 .F — Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Figure 1:Location of 8015 SW Hunziker Rd in relation to the FEMA 100 year flood. See Appendix A for full FEMA FIRM b FLMA's National Hood Hazard Layer iNFHL)Viewer ..n w<,Weee.ra ewes VeF I .. mIa R AYrY • f • A s ' a f x— \a s.wvi..wr C. . . , t ric.i , . III .� ri . ' g3 t ©mv +r• '4 p 04 r `� 1 `/ ii , 1. Figure 2:Close-up of site in the FEMA 100 year flood zone Impact of storm water runoff from changed impervious area The site was analyzed for potential impact on the height of the base flood level resulting from stormwater runoff from new impervious surfaces during a 100-year flood.The largest volume of stormwater runoff added to flood waters would be expected to occur during a 100-year rain event. Therefore, impact from stormwater runoff was determined using the 100 year, 24-Hour Rainfall Depth of 4.50 inches(Per Clean Water Services Drawing No. 1280). Design hydrology for on-site stormwater runoff from the impervious surfaces on the site both for pre and post-development were calculated using HydroCAD 10.10 modeling software and the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH) Method. The HydroCAD Modeling Output for the 100-year storm is shown in Appendix A.The surface area of the surrounding flood waters as measured on the FEMA map was determined to be —1,788,683 sq. Ft (See Figure 3). The formula used to determine the final expected change of base flood level is shown in Equation 1. dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 3 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 4`�l""tan White Pelican Consulting/ LLC 1'clir C limp Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 0 g=, ,sm,,... ,,,, u.. x - C O C 0 - ..cgileOm - _ _, 1, 7, e ® is ' •ott—y;:.o-b Q&,t,o.,w...,„.. 0 i 1,�w,:,lip. •�x,e e... gI I MA's National I load Ila;aid I aye,(Nf I if)Vlewcl -'•w 4i •^-'-._-'.. _ *. i G, ee-:sc r-4.tat ., ;me. x 0, ♦ rJ' • $ T a •M9V! .- Sc Free- o . P i 3 u� *Id•.• I °4 �y-Y • 1• ; 1,788,682.5 Sq Feet : I I . r ' ` fff.111YYi < 1� II �� 1r90II1M- 4 f S v.' 3 _ 2 + + Figure 3:Surface Area of Zone A immediately surrounding the site Equation 1:Change of Base Flood Level from Storm water Runoff A 100 year Runoff ft3) inch A Flood level(inch) = Surface Area of FEMA Flood Zone (ft2) * 12 foot Table 2: Impact on Flood Level from Storm water Runoff Parameter Amount Unit Existing Lot Conditions 100 yr. Runoff 24,989 cu.ft Proposed Lot Conditions 100 yr. Runoff 24,962 cu.ft Difference -27 cu.ft Surface Area of FEMA Flood Zone -1,788,683 sq.ft Impact on Flood level -0.0002 inch The flood level is expected to decrease from the proposed changes in impervious area,although 0.0002 inches or 1/5000 inch is an immeasurable amount for all practical purposes. No change in the base flood level during base flood discharge is expected from stormwater runoff as a result of changes in impervious area being proposed at the site, nor will there be an increase of the surface level of the 100- year flood. dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 4 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 White el Pelican White Pelican Consulting, LLC Cull\uIung Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Impact of displaced volume from proposed new construction A volume check calculation was performed to determine if the new added building volume would increase the base flood elevation. Base flood elevations noted in the adjoining Zone AE around Fanno Creek appear to be roughly 7 feet above ground level as determined from the ground level 2' contours shown in Tigard Maps [2] and comparing to the base flood elevations noted in the FEMA FIRM (Appendix B). Using the proposed additional 500 sq. ft. of added footing to the building for the deck (210 sq. ft.), ramp and stairs (252 sq.ft.),and cladding (38 sq.ft.) an approximation of displaced water volume was determined for up to 3 feet height. After 3 feet flood waters would be over the deck, ramp, and stairs, and would no longer be subject to volume displacement from the proposed construction.As the cladding will be installed at a height of 18" off the ground volume displacement was determined from 1- 18"of flood height, and then 1-36"of flood height. Table 3:Impact on Base Flood Level from Displaced Volume Resulting from Proposed Construction Parameter Amount Unit Area of site 93,218 sq.ft. Area of existing building 34,060 sq.ft. Area of building plus new additions 0-18" 34,522 sq.ft. Area of building plus new additions 18-36" 34,560 sq.ft. 1-18"water rise,existing site flood volume 88,737 cu.ft 1-18"water rise, proposed site flood volume 88,044 cu.ft 1-18"water rise Displaced volume of water 693 cu.ft 1-36"water rise, existing site flood volume 177,474 cu.ft 1-36"water rise, proposed site flood volume 176,031 cu.ft 1-36" Displaced volume of water 1,443 cu.ft Surface Area of FEMA Flood Zone _ 1,788,683 sq.ft. 1-18"Estimated Impact on base flood height 0.005 inch 18-36"Estimated Impact on base flood height 0.010 inch The volume of displaced water from the new additions was determined to be a maximum of"'1,443 cu. ft and when spread across the section of Zone A located between Hwy 217 and the railroad, resulted in insignificant rise of 0.010 inches or 1/100th of an inch. For perspective,the minimum size a droplet of water must be in order to be heavy enough to fall and be considered a raindrop is 1/50th or 0.02 inches [3]. Because the base flood surface level is connected to the section of zone A north of the Hwy 217, and to Fanno Creek in the south, the calculated rise of 0.005 -0.01 inch would be much less. The proposed building additions will have no measurable impact on the base flood level. No change in the base flood level during base flood discharge is expected from volume displacement as a result of the proposed additions to the building, nor will there be an increase of the surface level of the 100-year flood. dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 5 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 `°' lit`:anConsulting,White Pelican LLC }'c Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 References 1. FEMA Base Flood Maps https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home 2. Tigard Maps Online https://maps.tiga rd-or.gov/Htm I5V fewer/I ndex.htm I?viewer=Publ icAdva nced 3. USGS Raindrops are different sizes https://www.usgs.gov/special-top is/water-science-school/science/raindrops-are- different-sizes?qt-science center objects=0#qt-science center objects dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 6 PO BOX#33946 Portland, OR 97292 ` Thit,; White Pelican Consulting, LLC Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 Appendix A: HYDROCAD® MODELING OUTPUT dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 7 PO BOX#33946 Portland,OR 97292 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a sin M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SBUH method, Split Pervious/Imperv. Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff Area=93,295 sf 85.01% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.21" Tc=5.0 min CN=82/98 Runoff=2.14 cfs 24,989 cf Subcatchment 2S: Proposed Runoff Area=93,218 sf 84.94% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.21" Tc=5.0 min CN=82/98 Runoff=2.13 cfs 24,962 cf 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 2.14 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 24,989 cf, Depth> 3.21" Runoff by SBUH method, Split Pervious/Imperv., Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 34,060 98 Building 45,253 98 Parking/Hardscape 13,982 82 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG D 93,295 96 Weighted Average 13,982 82 14.99% Pervious Area 79,313 98 85.01% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Existing Hydrograph i Runoff 2.14 cfs 2- Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Runoff Area=93,295 sf Runoff Volume=24,989 cf Runoff Depth>3.21" Tc=5.0 min 1- LL CN=82/98 • 5 —o . . 5 6 7 6 9 10. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 3 Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Proposed Runoff = 2.13 cfs @ 7.90 hrs, Volume= 24,962 cf, Depth> 3.21" Runoff by SBUH method, Split Pervious/lmperv., Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type IA 24-hr 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Area (sf) CN Description 35,115 98 Building 44,069 98 Parking/Hardscape 14,034 82 Woods/grass comb., Fair, HSG D 93,218 96 Weighted Average 14,034 82 15.06% Pervious Area 79,184 98 84.94% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S: Proposed Hydrograph E Runoff t2.13cfs Type IA 24-hr 2 100 year Rainfall=4.50" Runoff Area=93,218 sf Runoff Volume=24,962 cf Runoff Depth>3.21rr Tc=5.0 min LL ' CN=82/98 44. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Multi-Event Tables Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Events for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Event Rainfall Runoff Volume Depth (inches) (cfs) (cubic-feet) (inches) 100 year 4.50 2.14 24,989 3.21 8015 SW Hunziker Existing 100 year flood Multi-Event Tables Prepared by White Pelican Consulting Printed 7/7/2020 HydroCAD® 10.10-4a s/n M32063 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Events for Subcatchment 2S: Proposed Event Rainfall Runoff Volume Depth (inches) (cfs) (cubic-feet) (inches) 100 year 4.50 2.13 24,962 3.21 1Yhite White Pelican Consulting, LLC c.Pelican Environmental Engineering & Data Analysis WBE, DBE, ESB Oregon Certified # 12223 APPENDIX B: FEMA FIRM dbeck@whitepelicanconsulting.com 1503.847.9455 I www.WhitePelicanConsulting.com 13 PO BOX#33946 Portland,OR 97292 UPY6II99WM5.262f,T11 2� r • III • �Ya1M � -�F9 Y _. • t r t. I K's4 � �, r „ � A u _ -:a yf 'j. • _..> q. a- - ram)•-' \ �.� ' ... S •' 'ia,jf;• l 8-.4 le• d< ` '" Y r ` .7: ... ''`� aft r .'•`; e [ a h l 'ram 1 .rZ .�. ll \ 4 • 1. ?Kr, t �N )!. 1y � � ea G -: .i � +' a . - ;i'i' i=" .- - or. - ', - i - 4.Aa + . j' � • .• Tee..._ rr '. • • G R 1i • M a ; + --eFIL. . � R � I. 1 ,.Id - �i .' rT� ► ON A 7 J ,it4 • :� S 1 ii !(�.3_. wi , ;T '.r � . 5 -fir s:.2- -"�i FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE sarox rnxrw.u[,Teir''''r.mnw ••....r.'.-7rtt..r :�.+�'+ um... _w_.-.� E NIIIONK FlDOO MYR.N/.PROGRAM mamma, MU nm � ��= w4 � WASNINGTON CDUMY OREGON Ma.rt.enYm ...... •• w� e�.s.raurrr.r.•..,...•.m n.rw-`.a w.�wM 2 AND INCORPORATED PAWS .y....#p ^-7.••••• 1.�r.rr.w►•z:>.c',�.:� A Sr..Boo l..I „m9.DUG W n. r.nu 542„r so8 MUM Mw r..V.+n.Nrb.f �. _ . r ° wo `FM w V °w:----r::�'. nrw.r ..M N o n Iro aao ]ro +cam Ali R j\\\\`ra.. ..MM 'd c MAIM vwa «Mee m1.o,am ...........�...o ..�.r_�--_�==.1.1R.....^.�'^..•� o O.MM.. o A s.Merv.nl u� .n.rr 2r .M1 ne. ...MOMrvnmma -rr......r NW MA®ER tlwATE ff cr E r2...tsr04 M, E RAGAN ASSOCIATES , INC. )1.4V ARBORICULTURAL CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 9, 2020 TO: Lisa Christie (Christie Architecture) FROM: Todd Prager,A1CP, RCA#597, ISA Board Certified Master Arborist RE: Supplemental Arborist Report for 8015 SW Hunziker Street Summary This is the Supplemental Arborist Report for the proposed FS&S Building Renovation project at 8015 SW Hunziker Street as required by Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Section 10.3 of the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. Thirty(30)percent effective canopy will be provided through the planting of native trees. The required minimum effective canopy for the site is 25 percent,therefore the proposal exceeds the minimum requirement. The proposed parking lot tree canopy coverage will increase from 20 percent, up to 25 percent. Therefore,the project moves towards compliance with the parking lot tree canopy cover standard of 30 percent. Background FS&S is remodeling their building at 8015 SW Hunziker Street in Tigard. The City of Tigard has determined that the Tree Canopy requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code apply to the project. The assignment requested of our firm for this project was to: • Prepare a Supplemental Arborist Report for the proposed development as required by Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 10.3; • Provide recommendations for meeting with the street tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 12; • Provide recommendations for moving the project towards compliance with the parking lot tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 13; and Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835.Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 2 of 13 • Coordinate,provide recommendations, and a signature of approval for the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan prepared by Christie Architecture as required by Chapter 18.420 and Urban Forestry Manual Sections 10.1 and 10.2. Supplemental Arborist Report The Supplemental Arborist Report requirements in Section 10.3 of the Urban Forestry Manual consist of three main parts: 1) an inventory of existing trees and tree removal/protection recommendations; 2) an inventory of trees to be planted and planting recommendations; and 3)a determination of whether the canopy requirements for the development have been met and/or recommendations for meeting the canopy requirements. This section of the report addresses these three components. Inventory of Existing Trees and Tree Protection/Removal Recommendations This section of the report addresses the inventory of existing trees and tree protection/removal recommendations. Inventory: On May 18,2020 I completed the inventory of existing trees at the project site. The complete inventory data for each tree is provided in Attachment 1 and includes the tree number, common name, scientific name,trunk diameter(DBH), crown radius, crown area(canopy),whether the tree is open or stand grown, whether the tree is a heritage tree, condition rating, suitability for preservation rating, pertinent comments, and whether the tree will be removed or retained. The tree numbers in the inventory in Attachment 1 correspond to the tree numbers on the Tree Preservation and Removal Plan in Attachment 2. Tree Removal and Retention: As part of the remodel project,the owner is proposing to removal all of the existing(non-native)trees at the site and replace them with . native trees. Tree Protection: Tree protection is not applicable since all of the existing trees are proposed for removal. Inventory of Trees to be Planted and Tree Planting Recommendations This section of the report addresses the inventory of trees to be planted and tree planting recommendations. Inventory: The complete inventory data for each tree to be planted is provided in Attachment 3 and includes the tree number, common name, scientific name, caliper or height, mature crown(canopy)spread,mature crown (canopy) area, available soil volume, and pertinent comments. The tree numbers in Attachment 3 correspond to the tree numbers on the Tree Canopy Plan in Attachment 4. Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle •Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.corn Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 3 of 13 Tree Planting Recommendations:New trees that are planted to meet the effective canopy requirements shall conform to the applicable standards in the City of Tigard Urban Forestry Manual. They shall be planted in accordance with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards for tree planting(A300, Part 6)and additional standards adopted by the Oregon Landscape Contractors Board (OLCB). Nursery stock shall meet the requirements of the American Association of Nurserymen (AAN) for nursery stock(ANSI Z60.1) for Grade No.1 or better. Double stake trees only if needed for stability. The site soils consist of Aloha silt loam and Verboot silty clay loam, and are considered adequate for tree planting, growth, and vitality if provided proper drainage.Note that this area is highly disturbed so there is likely significant past importing and exporting of soils as is typical in urban areas. To prepare areas for new planting, backhoe turning should be used to loosen soil. Remove any layers of good topsoil and temporarily stockpile. Spread 3-to 4-inches of organic (high-lignin) compost or ESCS (Expanded shale/Calcine Clay) amendment over the area prior to turning the soil. Maintaining a safe distance(angle of repose)from paving, sidewalks, structures, and utilities, use a backhoe to turn soil to 36-inch depth. Break soil into large peds and loosely incorporate the soil amendment. Maintain a slope of compacted soil at the edge of the paving(angle of repose) so as not to undermine the paving sub-base. Hand turning may be necessary along the edges of paving and at walls. Do not till to a depth greater than the bottom of footing. After turning, re-spread topsoil and add 3- 5-inches of yard waste organic amendment over the surface and lightly till to break the soil into texture suitable to fine grade. Strategies to provide sufficient soil volume for newly planted trees have been implemented. All trees to be planted at the site have been provided over 1,000 cubic feet of soil volume. Canopy Requirements The proposed development is within the I-L zoning district which requires 25 percent effective canopy. The area of the subject site is 93,218 square feet. The mature canopy of planted native trees (22,577 square feet) is eligible for 125 percent credit. The total effective canopy provided is 28,221 square feet which represents 30 percent of the site area. Therefore,the minimum effective canopy requirement for the site (25 percent) is met. A summary of the effective canopy provided by the proposed development is provided in Attachment 5. Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 4 of 13 Street Tree and Parking Lot Tree Requirements This section of the report provides recommendations for meeting the street tree and parking lot tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Sections 12 and 13. Street Tree Requirements Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code requires one street tree for each 40 feet of street frontage. When the result is a fraction,the required number of street trees is rounded to the nearest whole number. Section 12 of the Urban Forestry Manual requires street trees to be provided minimum soil volumes based on the width of the right of way. The right of way frontage at the site is approximately 236 feet. Therefore, at least six street trees are required. As shown in the proposed Tree Canopy Plan in Attachment 4,ten medium stature street trees planted 24 feet on center will be provided. As shown in the inventory of trees to be planted in Attachment 3, all street trees will be provided over 1,000 cubic feet of soil volume so the street tree soil volume requirements will be met. Parking Lot Tree Requirements Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code requires parking lot tree canopy to cover at least 30 percent of a parking lot area. Section 13 of the Urban Forestry Manual requires parking lot trees to be provided at least 1,000 cubic feet of soil volume. For this renovation project,the City of Tigard is requiring the applicant to move closer towards compliance with the parking lot tree canopy requirements in Chapter 18.420. As shown in Attachments 2 and 4,the parking lot canopy coverage will move towards compliance with the 30 percent canopy coverage requirement as follows: Existing Parking lot square footage: 25,278 square feet Parking lot canopy square footage: 5,016 square feet Parking lot percent canopy coverage: 20 percent Proposed Parking lot area square footage: 24,203 square feet Parking lot canopy square footage (from nine new trees): 5,995 square feet Parking lot percent canopy coverage: 25 percent As shown in the inventory of trees to be planted in Attachment 3, all parking lot trees will be provided over 1,000 cubic feet of soil volume so the parking lot tree soil volume requirements will be met. Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com •Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 5 of 13 Tree Plan Recommendations This section of the report includes a review of the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan prepared by Christie Architecture. Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment 2 substantively includes the required information for a Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan listed in Section 10.1 of the Urban Forestry Manual. Tree Canopy Site Plan Attachment 4 substantively includes the required information for a Tree Canopy Site Plan listed in Section 10.2 of the Urban Forestry Manual. It will be important to ensure the construction documents include the planting preparation notes from the project arborist so that the contractors understand how to implement the plan. Note that root barriers are also required when trees are within five feet of paved areas. Also, keep in mind that parking lot and other site lighting, utility vaults, and other site improvements should not be placed in the planting beds if it will conflict with the tree planting requirements. Conclusion Thirty(30)percent effective canopy will be provided through the planting of new native trees. The required minimum effective canopy for the site is 25 percent, therefore the proposal exceeds the minimum requirement. The proposed parking lot tree canopy coverage will increase from 20 percent, up to 25 percent. Therefore,the project moves towards compliance with the parking lot tree canopy cover standard of 30 percent. The information in this report also demonstrates that the street tree and parking lot tree planting requirements will be met. Please contact me if you have questions, concerns, or need any additional information. Sincerely, 1� Todd Prager ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#597 ISA Board Certified Master Arborist, WE-6723B ISA Qualified Tree Risk Assessor AICP,American Planning Association Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle •Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835•Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com •Website:teragan.cotn Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 6 of 13 Attachments: Attachment 1 - Inventory of Existing Trees Attachment 2- Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan Attachment 3 - Inventory of Planted Trees Attachment 4 - Tree Canopy Plan Attachment 5 - Summary of Effective Canopy Attachment 6- Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd,teragan.corn •Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker rr 20 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture 4.t ,f 7 SS R A G A N July 9,of2 13 0 ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 7 of 13 LJJ ARBORICULTURAL CONSULTANTS Attachment 1 Existing Tree Inventory Tree No. Common Name Scientific Name DBH' C-Rad2 Canopy3 0/S4 HT5 Condb Pres' Comments Treatment 1 sweetgum Liquidambor styraciflua 18 18 1018 0 N 3 3 street tree,side pruned for overhead high voltage lines remove 2 sweetgum Liquidambarstyraciflua 12 15 707 0 N 3 3 street tree,side pruned for overhead high voltage lines remove 3 sweetgum Liquidambarstyraciflua 14 14 616 0 N 3 3 street tree,side pruned for overhead high voltage lines remove 4 sweetgum Liquidombar styraciflua 16 24 1810 0 N 3 3 street tree,side pruned for overhead high voltage lines remove 5 sweetgum Liquidambarstyraciflua 17 23 1662 0 N 2 2 street tree,side pruned for overhead high voltage lines remove 6 apple Ma/us sp. 8 12 452 0 N 1 1 low vigor,significant decay remove 7 apple Malussp. 4 8 201 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 8 apple Malus sp. 4,4,3,3,3,2,2 14 616 0 N 1 1 multiple leaders at ground level,low vigorremove 9 apple Malus sp. 4 7 154 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 10 apple Malussp. 7 11 380 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 11 apple Malus sp. 8 14 616 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 12 apple Malus sp. 5 10 314 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove Teragan Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835•Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker :", t T, E R A(3 A N July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture l7 ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 8 of 13 ARRORICULTURAL CONSULTANT', Attachment 1 Existing Tree Inventory Tree No. Common Name Scientific Name DBH' C-Rad2 Canopy' O/S° HTs Condt Pres' Comments Treatment 13 purpleleaf plum Prunus cerasifera 15 12 452 0 N 1 1 low vigor remove 14 red oak Quercus rubra 21 31 3019 0 N 2 2 high crown from pruning,moderately remove one sided 15 pin oak Quercus paiustris 15 27 2290 0 N 2 2 high crown from pruning moderately remove one sided 16 pin oak Quercus paiustris 25 29 2642 0 N 2 2 moderately one sided remove 1DBH is tree diameter measured at 4.5-feet above ground level,in inches.Trees with multiple stems at or near ground level are converted to a single DBH shown according to the requirements in the City of Tigard code. 2C-Rad is the average crown radius measured in feet. 'Canopy is the average tree canopy area(in square feet)calculated as follows:Canopy=(Average Tree Canopy Spread/2)2 x tt. 40/SG identifies the trees as either Open Grown or Stand Grown the average crown radius measured in feet. sHT identifies whether or not the tree is a Heritage Tree(either y for yes or N for no). 6Cond is the numerical condition rating(0-3)as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING VIGOR CANOPY DENSITY DEADWOOD FAILURE HISTORY PESTS DECAY 0 dead to severe decline <30% major scaffold branches >1 scaffold Infested major conks and cavities 1 declining 30-60% twig and branch dieback scaffold branches Infested one to a few conks;small cavities 2 average 60-90% small twigs small branches Minor present only at pruning wounds 3 good to excellent 90-100% little or none none None absent to present only at pruning wounds 'Pres is the numerical suitability for preservation rating(0-3)as defined in the Tigard Urban Forestry Manual: RATING CONSIDERATIONS 0 The tree is a"hazard tree as defined in chapter 18.120 of the Tigard Development Code and"hazard tree abatement"as defined in Chapter 18.120 in the Tigard Development Code cannot be completed In a manner that results In tree retention consistent with tree care industry standards. 1 The tree is dead,in severe decline,or declining but may still be retained if desirable for wildlife or other benefits because it is not considered a"hazard tree"or"hazard tree abatement"could be performed. 2 The tree has average health and/or structural stability that could be alleviated with treatment;the tree will be less resilient to development impacts and will require more frequent management and monitoring after development than a tree rated as a"3". 3 The tree has good to excellent health and structural stability;the tree will be more resilient to development impacts,and will require less frequent management and monitoring after development than a tree rated as a"2". Teragan Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835•Fax 503.697.1976 Email;todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com L.R:T11100,Reif SW/RR 19/1.11 "`"° CHRISTIE ' , _ LOT TTEE CARR w1EP0DE warn ma +ese •:urn.v .+... lgiT a.lueEmEE.c.ww.AAi.' s.,.a W°"M Deeene ,uCR S IRA Taul.EEl ..EWE r.wm°"Eo".e. ARCHITECTURE RR/4TRTORERRED X TREE __ _ _ RR.. PSI 95.R$W IRE Plea wrvxe Twee DeroTxe MEMO. lmm PonkM,OR 81319 11.11109E OFF C.RA„✓12 I I M6 a.RYREAR Y1.9WISwlSS 101 L�iIM.PAIR9.a i�wmospen amorous Howe 503.iwfi6n m0 ERR RR. eF EATER ERE/ __— m5Eam RI OF s.s.amr eves Sr PROVE 1.11 EESTrn s.A.m --- 1/.21Rcw FE<.T,TRO'OE°pse REA. soils s.n9 .n� pass, .w81 w� n, van. D sos m e. ". Attachment 2 e. REIRVE OS OS ..2ca4DF.ca e,, wham w TOTAL uluxvw e«rvee ERB ao8s MAUVE 88918830T no E..9v/Woos. REAq. IR 4 TwMnE.RE. 0e� .. . 0.6/88+x1.IWvuwe .a ..Dee m II 8666/8 o9 sow PI 68-80s6 so ess n wvD.., x v woo,ososure Tmsu. Ts.esev "wv i°• Taus MoEDw rW+.mr,so.sF. I - -- ---------- / ; / i" • s. / ' / i I -17 ,' SUBMITTED FOR '.-/ i LAND USE REVIEW- —` `\ __ NOT FOR I20 - X ` I CONSTRUCTION Y l ❑ / 1 \ ,.,`�' \ FS&S Bldg Renovation //` , / 1 / % TN \\`l 6\l7 8016 Huneaer Steel / ` l 1 /1/ \t L rood,OR97229 \\l x Li 1 F x i / ix' 1ex i A_mll l l siwDUE l v ,6X I 11 B I. .re.. /�� \ I I 1 yam.-1--JI - ,owl.- \ _�yA -� -- - -J g y Tree Plan- 1911Dcsein4P.RE111.9.NTMIeis:l s ExistingI Deolition amS.,ars.scow m �qIL m1.4 •2" I A0.04 ,OW PNRA.691 „,,,,,_ 61521 N3.W.rAT go,,,,,,,g00 .5 1 Tree Plan-Existing I Demolition a , ,sops, 1•=Ea' ,- reoaff June 29.4020 Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture = p T E R A G A N Page 10 of 13 3 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. ARRORICULTURAL CONSULTANTS Attachment 3 Planted Tree Inventory Tree Lot Mature Canopy Mature Canopy Available Soil Volume No. No. Common Name Scientific Name Caliper or Height Spread(ft) Area(sq.ft.) (cu.ft.of soil) Comments 17 n/a ' cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 18 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiona 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree I 19 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiona 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 20 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-Inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 21 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiona 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 22 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiono 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 23 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 24 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 25 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 26 n/a cascara Rhamnus purshiana 1.5-inch 25 491 1000+ street tree 27 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 28 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 29 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 30 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 31 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 32 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryona 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 1 33 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 34 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 35 n/a Oregon white oak Quercus garryana 1.5-inch 50 1963 1000+ parking lot tree 22577 ,.., flP +M.m,-em .1W,.EFG,u..T F50P08,8ARRISL01T.Re...1SM..1 IEEOWOPET.61E CHRISTIE LRW ECPE61m....G IXLY NMLLRR.ANT00SI...11.111 ROIRTELAYERGN1NATv1.L ET.S5.G E61n11E(A1250) ! O TOT,LW.FW6u0TO.Ei.8S....Y.RA. L.. CWIM Sf0.. EL9 s....MF.T.....i....6eXNR 1MIELNCW.......... ........ ..r... ....41IXC4 ...... .... M.S.. TIFEE nu! MALA'E eNYID NFA '"""DT OUMIM m.6.110.oe1O0 ERSOU.Srv.en0EEsox.EHLEOEOFOR s1nun.80CIATON CS'G' 'e""wrow.wemms m(w+e(rmnvo+ xmamuFwwE. ....c.ro..EeU.E.MSMESS GEKrnVOWTCMG. eSF ARCHITECTURE u(0GCG NOT CM.00+) __ Su1A0E�,.ECS TwTwMew.1ME0 OTt IT m. B591 SW 18M P1.0, i SIE ei KNSK1 Ciu-PN ALT IMM.No`h0Wf5L..Cu.Weu.,0G,TE0016¢E^m.M0STEFGT.EE CI0MMS0M1w'M. .....000I EG,MFAFEAIISEETA1P: OA! 000Uw0.NW 00.100E FMM9 n 4Y... (eps OSE pyllytl,en ants Nsa�0L0Fs1Os�,Nim 05 IsaiE1w.1 TNCA1re.al1Glwvothw0ES SO 1NE.E ISUOEL.SINNrwvr PAST memm..o.IO Sa.GC� m ......lud BUT IS NOT LLME 70........101.11..10 FRAM dromro OS WEE CANOP.AO Fu.RR.1.66u7N<EN 155E E.w10ro LMA.O s6EwwL 2. E. 503-766-6677 10.FM.0,MCam SP..110...ES.0.GMC1u.i.LA CgeWETW....Aa/Mm61SO0M OF EC1,141LNDI uwxwwGN101' 1125IROMEe'. 35 roF.VeT.a Yelp L�aiD Fw 21 2001 iss 15e C.A. Sr 9E 4i NxGIFRMML1...v.Mq.PLFw.MG.GTNCTY.ER.M I...Fs...p. Rvevmd...u0GLUTA^� . 06T 11.1.111.8.8.' A.S..TOTSMEOCVO.ISC.OEFTY uwwLnrovaeEFESS MO LomEL.wNvwL.relrE SIX AVElwwr. ev.6 Ga0ATE....TNENEe.w OS 2.07 lo505IALOWNa L a 255 S54 : G! GSE PARSE 50®EOL0.71...........E+ R1EFOEE18O I8NMTOL19 10500E MVX36.5StLT.MO MOTs. IaGL.leuOnnGA.E W ^^ MS. 0. ..A. # al 01 Attachment 4 mRApGON0TTLLTo,DEMSOFFMT01T�„..Lo111.40,a6,.,G ,a T19OLT MOT1Ei1501...41. 111R16 M 05050 Re OF Y. en4uTK AKWUFNT Ph.I.S.FAGL MO S.M.1LL SO MEM GLOMS .1W .. a SF OTALGUALd.1G...1E .,1 CO .Nd50E;....EGFA...LOTT1E.....i, O•MOSE G6 lam 0o 1VMTLLOFl6 1g1�6EANR60 Kq NFLTYE..lO 11TV1F, IPT THE.ud.101 THE CURRENT C..... O.LN61E6W nil. G0 / 1EGEw \ s. ........ sR .LGmo 1.IwwS 001015id.N.11.Eero....ACE PAS.. • mue sme oLxTEIEarL 1000. 50 ISIS.g tO d61H0u0n1.FT.[Feo1lM �. `./ 0 WN&VM vCAL OP W E110M1 MYMSMCEN1d TixaITREETO0F1.1 G.41N1«1169. O.NM[OY[ I. Ftl 1 ® ®S - 0.w16R 0.0 1 Re BF 20. 11RMS. 1O'M TNV R ti.E,6Posm R w o 0 , GU..EU ,.CAL S.. A,6„6L. 1.1E1.E.Nro.AN1.G.N1.M,OL G. 6. R um.u. ro 6 ..pm p1 R;R . MNNRCML ,4a. AR AI 6F 701.1.2 22.0n SF LW Si 11 1. e.NF0OTFRN1.S.0S. 4: I — ------- -- --------------- Mil - a 1 % =_ Nit / St, 1 i23 tet SUBMITTEDFOR• E / LAND USE REVIEW-s l _ _ CONSTRUCTION f/ _ 1°11 ii R / Ill lit=== yyFSBS Bldg Renovation R ! Tigard.b15NOR9723 lir, I ; • 111111 +�19 # v. ... _7. �5 T 4 e 'r12 T -e1- td�ii- k__'Yv 1 9i 1ti-1 ;�4 — 7f I �fi JWar - e '"e. _s"-L J � {1.001.0.,,nEsmerSNI Tree Pla,- `p ��"' CT1i 160......R.S Iw howseLl . I4wwSPo1STICCM OFTRF. .-S. A0.05 WE,... �;� — - TCW FG..... ejRLT RG.GR1 g 1'ee Plan-Proposed �1�•aw.. 117920' June 29,2020 Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker rye :; T E R A G A N July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture I./N Page 12 of 13 r .3 e3 ASSOCIATES, INC. UjJ ARBORICULTURAL CONSULTANTS Attachment 5 Effective Canopy Summary 2x Canopy Area(sq.ft.) 2x Canopy Area(sq.ft.) 1.25 x Mature Mature Canopy 1.25x Mature Effective of Preserved Trees of Preserved Stands Canopy Area Area(sq.ft.)of Canopy Area Tree Canopy Canopy(Canopy Area (w/condition and (w/condition and (sq.ft.)of Native Non-Native (sq.ft.)of Area(sq.ft.)per Area/Project Lot No. (sq.ft.) preservation rating>2) preservation rating>2) Planted Trees Planted Trees Planted Stands Project Area Area) 1 overall site 93,218 0 0 28,221 0 0 28,221 30% The minimum requirements for effective tree canopy cover are outlined below: 1.Subdivisions and land partitions: a.40 percent for the overall development site in the R-1,R-2,R-3.5,R-4.5 and R-7 zones,and 15 percent for each lot designated for single detached house development. b.33 percent for the overall development site in the R-12,R-25,and R-40 zones. 2.Apartments:33 percent for the overall development site. 3.Nonresidential development:33 percent for the overall development site,except nonresidential development in the MU-CBD,MUC-1,I-I,and I-H zones and schools(as defined in TCDC Section 18.60.050.1)are only required to provide 25 percent for the overall development site. 4.Mobile home parks:33 percent for the overall development site. 5.Wireless communication facilities:zero percent for the overall development site. Teragan Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego,OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835•Fax 503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com Arborist Repor for 8015 SW Hunziker July 9,2020 Lisa Christie,Christie Architecture Page 13 of 13 Attachment 6 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1. Any legal description provided to the consultant is assumed to be correct. The site plans and other information provided by Christie Architecture and other members of the project team was the basis of the information provided in this report. 2. It is assumed that this property is not in violation of any codes, statutes, ordinances,or other governmental regulations. 3. The consultant is not responsible for information gathered from others involved in various activities pertaining to this project. Care has been taken to obtain information from reliable sources. 4. Loss or alteration of any part of this delivered report invalidates the entire report. 5. Drawings and information contained in this report may not be to scale and are intended to be used as display points of reference only. 6. The consultant's role is only to make recommendations. Inaction on the part of those receiving the report is not the responsibility of the consultant. 7. The purpose of this report is to: • Prepare a Supplemental Arborist Report for the proposed development as required by Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 10.3; • Provide recommendations for meeting the street tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 12; • Provide recommendations for meeting the parking lot tree requirements in Chapter 18.420 of the Tigard Development Code and Urban Forestry Manual Section 13; and • Coordinate,provide recommendations,and a signature of approval for the Tree Preservation and Removal Site Plan and Tree Canopy Site Plan prepared by Christie Architecture as required by Chapter 18.420 and Urban Forestry Manual Sections 10.1 and 10.2. Teragan&Associates,Inc. 3145 Westview Circle•Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Phone:971.295.4835 •Fax:503.697.1976 Email:todd@teragan.com•Website:teragan.com CleanWater Services SENSITIVE AREA PRE-SCREENING SITE ASSESSMENT Clean Water Services File Number 20-002143 1. Jurisdiction: Tigard 2. Property Information(example: 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): Name: 2S101 BD00300 Company: FRED SHEARER&SONS Address: 8015 SW HUNZIKER STREET OR Site Address: 8015 SW HANZIKER STREET City,State,Zip: TIGARD, OR, 97223 City, State,Zip: TIGARD, OR, 97223 Phone/fax: Nearest cross street: Email: 4. Development Activity(check all that apply) 4. Applicant Information ❑ Addition to single family residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: ADAM CHRISTIE ❑ Lot line adjustment 0 Minor land partition Company: Christie Architecture ❑ Residential condominium ❑ Commercial condominium Address: 9532 SW 18th Place ❑ Residential subdivision 0 Commercial subdivision City,State,Zip: portland, OR, 97219 ❑ Single lot commercial ❑ Multi lot commercial Phone/fax: 5037566677 Other COMMERCIAL ADDITION Email: adam@christiearchitecture.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑Unknown Location and description of off-site work: 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project: SITE HAS CWS VEGETATIVE CORRIDOR OVERLAY ON TIGARD MAPS GIS THAT WILL HAVE SELECT PLANTING.BUILDING IMPACTS>82'AWAY. This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality, Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form, the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative, acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true, complete,and accurate. Print/type name ADAM CHRISTIE Print/type title Signature ONLINE SUBMITTAL Date 7/29/2020 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY ❑ Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site.THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider Letter as required by Resolution and Order 19-5,Section 3.02.1,as amended by Resolution and Order 19-22.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local, State and federal law. Fr Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider Letter as required by Resolution and Order 19-5,Section 3.02.1,as amended by Resolution and Order 19-22.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. ❑ THIS SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS NOT VALID UNLESS CWS APPROVED SITE PLAN(S)ARE ATTACHED. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2). NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by • 4dAi i ,OQA. Date 08/14/2020 Onc omplete,email to:SPLReview@cleanwaterservices.org • Fax: (503) 681-4439 OR mail to: SPL Review,Clean Water Services,2550 SW Hillsboro Highway,Hillsboro, Oregon 97123 Revised zrzozo Main Office • 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • p:503.681.3600 f:503.681.3603 • cleanwaterservices.org AH4 WM PMWgMmE ZONE ' '.MOM nee. CHRISTIE sr/ E APEA arms/ . mTLwLIMMIE'. ARCHITECTURE W.,a Puwr.TE°o.u.STALLS:,MW 1116E 11 000 ell 95.'E2 SW lath Mr. ALL : 0 S.Sena REMPOlClsq.Ot 91210 LOT...GERIEDEV�EL ME I466 Jr OPED ME TILLALlS. ETLLs. 50}]$&CBT/ prorosrmertarocoverror MEMO 00E6 NOT NAVE AMMEASE TO MOOT ATEA BO WPM. P BRE PAM O NOTES �165 SEE YR ELAN DMAO POE 84-111 EO LAIRO.LOTLAVOnT BEm TA TEA ET MEMO.PanW M EP u 8000E 8 E PAiE°.TPE E APE TWO We°W TM PLC 08 p151ry.SPACES AXE Pm.MEET Pe.SO0APCS AIL WLL ELPYI BYE P...PE00.o.t STnIIS1I.PLW _11 AIM.IMp0.000MITLS Mel.SPACE TILL BE PROMM g S PBg0. MMW PMp1LSIE Ammer LAM M BM PAS0.E MMLS YACES. Puns 0tte69ME ir, le �Wra owe W Y S / ' `\\ SIPS Pl FTV LAE_ 7— _ . 1. / I e1 1 `l 11 ` F m BAST AeOVE 1 / 1 r 1 / _--.__� EMOM i1 'i ) --� -___�_-_ Balsm.BL.Mw ua _ _-� - LA TPE.EASEEe:eA° .wp� �� IIr 1 ...4Ns 1 KM. aoTPPmm_� G,,1'; / k S muwsc.n:TML.EA. PWwuM.vcA ` -� ti,`, / MESMER.En011in. eMT..CO MET OEMBL Pw EM MAWA TM n"oBE"RLnEx SUBMITTED FOR 1. le MAW 1 . 1 i / wloPnM.00M - Ads.IR EuamuPETO MM. WIAL"MiOOEs xEw -B1°P'P:EMBLEMS. w I LANDUSEREVIEW- EMS. • 'p tt • °PLvw. NOT FOR ♦ - i _ WSeP.mmPLM POIENPM CONSTRUCTION / / = M CMLP..MEP AM MIAS ` III, EPEP.LMPBICILLLA LJJI P WP;.;M55� 1 ET w y \I M 1 \, - FB&S Bldg Renovation 1 0 / i 6.\�" I BINS EmnrNWea s. r \ Tigard,OR 9n20 I . / MmM/1MMIMAM 9 oeBOIME,EW4Y� IEWttRTETE M.Wt /1 / 1 ___ `MM / I , l I 1 i" �♦ / \ `41 'r J � lam` �i % 1 I 1 I 1 \ 1 T ` -�pEvmemT Wrt _�� 1WSucw¢EmmBmm _ ,.,„¢B.vMWLWML v s. T- �IMmM-- ../. ♦ r j S SITE PLAN- I PROPOSED TM Tee MALE T.W iAOB02 Arr., pMEM.IMT�IPMCA _ MI .m,1SXm Plan-Proposed �MIELT�M i June29,2020 OS.Me...NOME Mae..GTE THE Flier.CWFR5E re...Rope.LOT 1P¢CMVY.COVEIMCE ....erre.E �EF.rrNEa.�ENrsEp„....N,ORnPR,.N.E1,.0EW,R.,a _ AM.. W CHRISTIE IOYE.Se.EG 111E red....W e..a0WCMD5 N.M.MMW Wn..re.emery mer.. SAfBF eT Rwr.ES Fonlive ME ,., G ..w�nN..s:.,..rTw,.o area aEG.Sfl0 ST man.c,w5 BOARD O N. re.... MET.. N` TR.. 20 .w5 sF.o um. RuewoLOT P.wwiur ARCHITECTURE 2.2.60.1. e.ere,e -65...R.K6.6..6aN VNVREPr.Ewv..nr.rye..sa.NNAm.nra ,rare0 ➢5 cn.n ,ex 6 w.EFrwe WnmE c.w.mnwEE.,,.PE 1010IS .ovEn , c..Wm. w ES 6.T EECEn tw:l.nm. Ma 9.2 SW tR07210 o1FA aIINOEI; Y R�500%BOfBEiEThRNPa OR 1W➢➢a0.PRi.R P.DVEO 1E f..Y11N MY . 1RSRswz SItSOS O,,,,,„ l,OW xo.mxmeLrvwrlyy,wp µEm,SeERoortcwl,,,,,,e4a,N0.4WWrh rope 0550 ....500r .. 2.6166 nLee.ne&sms er en cum por.prele mirreep oosom*erlerre MV aG Ratlane,OR 9)219 rep 16117.66E wmn.O.or.MUM...Ie.lw onurc Nrvrtv mien.so l,lGx¢uFCr m,..riaa re,uronn.Me I T6.6 E,fInE me...Wn,,,,,, PEgn nee MM.. NFMIT 12 Mr MOMTr.,OT.wrr1.00. 59'61565577 Emcx scar Irene.,i V ,rt mE[c..rvcwEWeE: xaH,sE GVGVN al Be 66.666. wallo,KWG.,Y CdWSr ea Mrerroun eelerrearcreeLee.,E.,EN1 M,IWNx GVFPYcoVEn PFWxF➢, av V. 110S ivS14 re.. 22 O.G,NN era. IS My ay 0Y .a re N...erre.,.w ere.....we sm4er16.6 . 6Arearr0 5 h(1OEn rem.LOU are..T 1NN IOCro Msf1..Me.1.rue..,M.HV 2TMWN0F TIE NE YEIdEM_ Awe 601.1.1..1M,.Nmw of av TOTNV.erele 21 C.SCMs lope Y' I a ATO arGoaeC,®Ye.T ME E.EOrna r.Vlq SlO.OR REPO.SO.5.1 TOOTFOTO meow.ITIO Oa..*9.4.I010 TV,N COMAr CP'm.TKr6OR.Cm SEC.....rs.R �,G1 oMM, 2. W^IY 1S6 N' Mty 9f R.p010M Men ef PANO.M1W.LL9.Dee.n..66.1NORARATUN1RW1Tc0CENIOWi IIER. y.,4 V.IMKWWM.STSnuo nee.er.ere Wel.OrrO4W4TE mpMYO ORWRET Over Ter soar.Am LW/.Tare MEM WM..VS VMVR a... CASCARA re Sr et 0# Ngrt,,,,.. ...,,NEOI,.EE. CV... Ia. aar R.MLL.m R01131E,EW.150 rM KWTHB.M en.. T OP NMECW{ le. re MI 6c Ser MS 111AEM0 OVER-ME MRM,a,R CLARR c.NOrr, a C161MTEOY Ia. . ma 66 es6 MY ,E000 y My.. 530 50 N.NE re. EH KHPW I sPKN NYY O N SCN CAnfnrpM AEE TO....e'er 1OM6 AV OPMREM rear 60 Ira Sr 36.. ens 2330030,3EWMEIBRF Cw0.rE3 %^ O 10 crscree FvvvmW AGL SSE of MM. WM1.6..area.RMN THE TO erreen Merl OPNR,E.. .. N .{sf VW,b'CN 010100 Me TPEE TO.RR IC.TIWrt05 mrreor, 1MO. SW WnuC> .0000 mmw 0 I =!...! 510515 .4P4 Ns a1NT.n CEN,B16rK5PERNNM.a1NEETR TR % O5NNRomt loco. eV SW SF sera nes srN ,.,. -- —J z , _7_ — — — — — �— — — -Sr rem SF q erivlM / i -j / aE,06150001f.T.mete r 95 --- ----------- kr ii7111 ...re-.... AN ON;�'�2' N 9 �• / SUBMITTED FOR � r LAND USE REVIEW- Pli qi / NOT FOR ICONSTRUCTION _toO \ I _ FS&S Bldg Renovation 115: Tpnre,OR 9]223 e v x ►�■ II%trIIII� IN" a _' -�Ef�7 � 11 r `,f„ uNw Nw i lipetp0 .11 s, �' 7f ,f ' E. - r. -q, +,�'+— - 1111"111111 101111 Tree Plan- eaeA n Proposed TOW flMe..CE1Fi50 RETKT mo,p.mm $ 1 Tree Plan-Proposes ,® 2230, =20 Jun029,2020 CleanWate\ Services SENSITIVE AREA PRE-SCREENING SITE ASSESSMENT Clean Water Services File Number 20-001317 1. Jurisdiction: City of Tigard 2. Property Information(example: 1S234AB01400) 3. Owner Information Tax lot ID(s): 2S101 BD00300 Name: Company: Fred Shearer&Sons Address: 8015 SW Hunzlker St OR Site Address: City,State,Zip: Tigard,OR 97223 City,State,Zip: 8015 SW Hunziker St,Tigard,OR 97223 Phone/fax: Nearest cross street: SW Walt St Email: 4. Development Activity(check all that apply) 4. Applicant Information ElAddition to single family residence(rooms,deck,garage) Name: Adam Christie Cl Lot line adjustment ElMinor land partition Company: Christie Architecture ❑ Residential condominium ❑ Commercial condominium Address: 9532 SW 18th Place Cl Residential subdivision ❑ Commercial subdivision City,State,Zip: Portland,OR 97219 ❑ Single lot commercial 0 Multi lot commercial Phone/fax: 503.756_6677 Other Commercial Addition Email: adam@christieamhitecture.com 6. Will the project involve any off-site work? Dyes 13 No ❑Unknown Location and description of off-site work: 7. Additional comments or information that may be needed to understand your project: Site has a CWS vegetative corridor overlay per Tigard Maps GIS.The proposed work is min 82'away from this zone(opp side of site). This application does NOT replace Grading and Erosion Control Permits,Connection Permits,Building Permits,Site Development Permits,DEQ 1200-C Permit or other permits as issued by the Department of Environmental Quality, Department of State Lands and/or Department of the Army COE. All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state,and federal law. By signing this form,the Owner or Owner's authorized agent or representative,acknowledges and agrees that employees of Clean Water Services have authority to enter the project site at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting project site conditions and gathering information related to the project site. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this document,and to the best of my knowledge and belief,this information is true,complete,and accurate. Print/type name Adam Christie ^^ PrinVtype title Christie Architecture Signature / 1 . Date 5.12.2020 FOR DISTRICT USE ONLY O Sensitive areas potentially exist on site or within 200'of the site.THE APPLICANT MUST PERFORM A SITE ASSESSMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER. If Sensitive Areas exist on the site or within 200 feet on adjacent properties,a Natural Resources Assessment Report may also be required. ❑ Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information sensitive areas do not appear to exist on site or within 200'of the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider Letter as required by Resolution and Order 19-5,Section 3.02.1,as amended by Resolution and Order 19-22.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,State and federal law. X Based on review of the submitted materials and best available information the above referenced project will not significantly impact the existing or potentially sensitive area(s)found near the site.This Sensitive Area Pre-Screening Site Assessment does NOT eliminate the need to evaluate and protect additional water quality sensitive areas if they are subsequently discovered.This document will serve as your Service Provider Letter as required by Resolution and Order 19-5,Section 3.02.1,as amended by Resolution and Order 19-22.All required permits and approvals must be obtained and completed under applicable local,state and federal law. ❑ THIS SERVICE PROVIDER LETTER IS NOT VALID UNLESS CWS APPROVED SITE PLAN(S)ARE ATTACHED. ❑ The proposed activity does not meet the definition of development or the lot was platted after 9/9/95 ORS 92.040(2).NO SITE ASSESSMENT OR SERVICE PR VI ER LETTE IS REQUIRED. Reviewed by �^' Date 5/26/2020 Once complete,email to:SPLReview@cleanwaterservices.org • Fax: (503)681-4439 OR mail to: SPL Review,Clean Water Services,2550 SW Hillsboro Highway,Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 Revised 2/2020 Main Office • 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway • Hillsboro,Oregon 97123 • p:503.681.3600 f:503.681.3603 • cleanwaterservices.org 1884i" / / \ REAR PROPERTY LINE 1 ........................ (E)LANDSCAPING 11 I LAD G I \ (E)LANDSCAPING (E)CONIC RAMP&STAIR I I -I y t-i///1 I ^Oi. (N)CURB LINE ZI � DASHED LINE OF(E)EDGE OF LANDSCAPING n U.. I 11 (E)LANDSCAPING Oa I a it •1 G .j. �yr114111 (N)PARTIALLRYW/CO COVERED STAIR&,n .3 ;� ENTRY W/GONG STAIR&" I RAMP(483 SF) C? (E)BUILDINGA (N)LANDSCAPING FOOTPRINT ,�/ ��ay \ (34,321 SF) � „ � pl ir ��•�����,� (N)COVERED DECK(330SF) 1 to / (N)LANDSCAPING I ® � (N)CONC EXTERIOR .'.... ! I STAIR . ...... ..... I ...... (E)CURB 1-3• I ....... ...... IIII JII( (E)LOADIN _ ZONE -L FRONTSETBACK: 30' ..�.. SIDEIDESETBACK' 0' 33 STREET SIDE' BY SETBACK' 0' M� F'901VT MAX HGT: 45' I~- y LOTSIZE: 93,218 SF `TpROpe r Np` (E)LANDSCAPING • 38 -0' 20' 40 BD' N oD1"=40' SITE PLAN: 8015 SW HUNZIKER ST. TIGARD, OR 97223 CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE LLC 9532 SW 18TH PLACE PORTLAND,OR 97219 MAY 12,2020 CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 992 SW IBM Mem Ppind,OP 97219 :N]56{6P am PKEEmx um / - / / m / % __ — - - , » ��= — / / mug imE mmosum To 1 r 1 �e�Ew.P.Eg�»x9» jF [ 1 1 FB&B Bldg Renovation / I P P II // rxeuu. 991s au»axe�sn9el r e \ rgaM,OR 9720 / 4 �: 1 e leew pump. .MEL g m u..»a.E Tv mum. SITEPLAN- - ie.- ME:,surtnrr ro mu.E. EXISTING/DEMO trEm.3e,e»w»EL.eE . IA 0 .01 09999 W p..s .,m9 RR,am 4SiePlan-Existing/Demolition M, m8Mm 8 =20' 1 June 29.2020 SOMPUNITIES MPS. H ,� ,NOTES SEWS SF CHRISTIE BrIF AREA991 +,.�eE. .'POS.B..ow v.. MILE ARCHITECTURE 4TM48 P9wwraw,a.ET9+c,TwUSs ... nsz sWren Pace .92 sr 29 v aeiussoEao PatlnE.OR 97219 SPOSSASSUPTcw RAPE sos-Tseean LOTS.. PM EP PEIWSOEEPEe 9rexu 2wvEu STALLS . +,vv vi AREA x9Enmax are PASSIM POSES sewn ego 0.00, ESW➢E TroEISInarae PAP SPACES 2229292. ESTE wsE.wu2P2Een.ol sr.us mow sr :v2� nu w22Ma c rumPIP w.wexuxmoxoeo. PINIS M WSP.¢s ALIACENI DE2 VELO•EnasiE°.'uLE RAVE apace Top.a..cExsaIw 29.IaET ACCESS T.PF .VOID SSFTM u'IWYNr temE SEY91ESOIIS oa VAN no. Iv ACCESSIBLE i' `\\ UDE PSWERTYM k_- i . / / / ' / v K' �l ramp aErapuc p�nM VIae VF __ I 1 /' I I } 19 pnw -� "\]/ I x // IaFimssw Tb0 O. \ .r; / E sEEa�EL.POTETxsOCO. ww u 9 `J - / / exe2E,E2.Elan.:.. 9m 0` 1 .f°a"Ew ems g22,222e.22�9.IaEa SUBMITTED FOR R ' / *" arvmawolro PEWS/ 92222E LANO USE NOT ORIEW- / sesP MINIMPP WES9e PPP WV in¢cEEenIa P.9o22 r ° ; s �p LOILI]eYM KIREVIE2CIMME NaEEIW OIMIME. 9MtECUtw ®MF6T91@Vw.4K 121 Access..P✓mlc acsspm2OxPW law[xEwp2 SPACE CONSTRUCTION 7l/ Earar c.S,RAW SIMospisEs, ' / — cwelao92PEavauexaEn __ _ __ _ __ __ EISSE ps F. T POOP 1"" , `11 / FS&S Bldg Renovation / PEI y y I `\'/° r 1 / 1� 6.\ O, P I eols lanEae.meal f /° / / a,a�Pn..a,a2ER,.. 7,„a,ETE..._� Ian __ MAC Pnia PO ROAM. �_. _ _ ' \ ` T6 N1 e6EFrolwocGwPWI — T — ^ —' ^ ^ `-- SITEPLSN- ---- ./ PROPOSED IMP9�.ouaa,PA.EleNI$PASS A0.02 i I��,�tlSOTP4. EESSPEPbMNOEmae e0E 5E9 1Saee Plan_Proposed SCALE s®9a99 99 2 220201 IS 9 1"=20' I June 29,2020 LAMDSCAPE , roE,wxa..ml9,aSTAMM " p a"" " CHRISTIE kV,. 'E ARCHITECTURE M POe, '4EPYE 9522 SW 10Palma OP 97218 3. mx a. xyi 501766E677 a ea sr TOTKLAIIISCAPEll.xu. 14,0.x I NNWS.1:9C-EE UEOO ']WSE NTOT W. -14.4 SF!SWEATER 11-1M. \ T __ _ _ 69E aaOKar'". _ _ __ _ _ —1 -�i I —11 0,, I -�--------------- ---------------"----- --� Ii �,. .� �' N ;) i'1 N / �` I 11. I I 1& SUBMITTED FOR I 9191F+ER6 ELEOT.c..T.9ew.amTO N k LANDUSEREVIEW- / /LKEIflEMla6alENM11lW. ° _ - CONSTRUOTION l'i 111H -m`"yl..ns °"'E` ♦ �� CONSTRUCTION Bldg Renovation I >m.<u»Y auE. F7='-iqiiill , i--- --..--[-il_i__ y yC� y `" / .se...L = rrmrnu ' / R -� 6'6 T�p_o.onv22eeei uE°J \ PwecuEo ue• g� _ I u / „Essux f --_�V �Nsxuxox^ _ -` tt�S L16Y6RaYF1 PYx 4M •PEo ' j I v __ - _ "-" SITEPLAN- - E LANDSCAPING ¢ I A0.03 Site Plan-Landscaping 6ff9 ,2e5acca,O l 1-=2 1, m June 29,2020 PROPOSED MaI.YLoT,REEr.MI.BBP'RME Ex9nM'RrePM,,,„ CHAisriE LE0n'0 TOM aaLnw wnaa5Tla en,Y. soleY ��� C o1 MEEEP Care r1AHIMY SEA mExllixr rYOVEPaIm soma EeE ARCHITECTURE E:slwmEE MBE lExarm X IREE3'e� _ __ daMErua MST1aEEBumr0E200E9au'REa9aBMnr px-n 9332 SW 18M MICR wTBRE'TEE Dm,. — Ov.B LaGvwGxCE no'REAR nu,ARE SORROUE®d n9aG naWE MBnIP140R 97219 AT LEAST'WEEDER Pr RIExaSPWtO u9ux2JCEIAN,R9. SWEETKIM It IS WTWE TFEE caper am. I I pY0glAEe.01T19 NOT 1.3.3lp3TO n1YOY LOT 131.0,403 MO EMFEEBIY le 14 Ina le MA ME 2. 1033 509-756-6677 nulMq u.tl me1%mm THE vuuriptar v=Ey.. MaTOW IC IVO SF RENENE _ su0Txpnni[e -- WI v _ :sneer O1EE101.61 Ir b WE ar PEWEE Yx apse roar.Bn1a1YT - 3013V .v MMU% ESDIECM1VOvEPIMIMO COT1 ♦SAMln.cxcvr covEI'. AMIE _ a A F li sEn911NEWN9LNE NxFv%005_I COVER 1EttYFD. ux M1f YLT maw am. vas IMF aY 29.419.1.88 Tn.-DIE SEIMYOFaaa l0IMpWira6WPWE NMfr II MO* F04Vf 01 OF I °MBIrw,Ee. NM 511E THEE ealavrweFxwE Y^E r 5a1NE He. MCC �� spar MCC ia.m. sal YE.. mreP.eE i sr ROOMA129G 015305E xYY t T1EEfAVPYE. Ina 1 MC. 0' n129G 0➢WE ]M TMOW SENSITIVE WAS LIME. ram. wawa copra M,NM®. / I r / I / wBBM Li / ; / i j / ; .---/ N. I � y -,- / SUBMITTED FOR ' _• / \ LANDUSEREVIEW- ' 1 -ti. s / NOT FOR ' 6 CONSTRUCTION i 'i l _',�':�— I \ FS&S Bldg Renovation 1 T1 n• ' a a i \�� \ MS Huplhar Segel , `\ I i I \ \\ \\ Tpad,OR e1223 aX / 9 I / 1 1t Ipr x;; L� 1 1 \N V�I'--41 ' pro., I / _. Ira--' � 1 10\ �G a\�1p -- 9 'bl"_ — `�— E TapoBua Pan.�T 1M I Tree Plan- ______-s ° - Paa aw0EYWINSECT BIa Existing/Demollhon ..,.,-.. 4/ I AO.04 I ``� ' Y.aa9T inii Tree Plan-basting I Demolition " 12 50x"ars an'':p^F..15 I 1^=2v I r=m I June29.2020 • • • ado.REMR.ttW WITS FW.D50%TETPE£GXOn.Cq'6ME 4102*4074RVp LO,1XH CMO.Y CU91.f£ TRW CA.WY,110E , MEW TREES TNT ARE PLANIED NwE.T0.1.eWMEmW0AR08A11EUTY0R EAE,A66PEABEA. WN�T�E�,,,RYA�. WC WNW SANK I.GOWN .1EA CHRISTIE PRAM URBAN 505125111 0.5.05.51Lti.P �1 LFIE WW CAMPY110 245� W[xBM µiu:mN( fn�xmW.C�eV WSW e0.010.G1. CWEP.FE. 1SE[50E1 ,M9f ..a. WHEY' "YWN EE NV C eLs. bin wWFOR wE6ERWWWW WEIMnRw NmEEw4En15E )n "'•0i0iAr r'"m"1O` ARCHITECTURE os I OwOE XO.1 OR BETe1.CVMEWAQl1EEB wLY V X¢oEe rat MONO �'Av.uu NOW n ..i BR ov 9W SW IOW Piece iR sttsWc WWIaucr OrrawL"MEET LW R awvoO UFn5507 Otry cuvlwu.900900 cad[ 009000wrt ECailEEnwvm0,050 ml TOTAL HYK.aD 1T90 ec .PE/,Iffel.wE.. ynm 14 � WIC Om Pa14M.OH 8M19 OW WOW Or IF MOWER PRICER 01.5.215. TI5 n1EWSHOMY o6,IPR0 SO 110011E 5UX¢YE1W ICIM POST WOWS..O WOL,IEO ELq.B ,,,e.wi9E m5ECnFM1 $ O�O� alSP O.m E4,Nn'o.c 1E5AS W IYV0u ry 444..„4„,,. 0WA1 GOVEaw0: R.0Xm0 AREAS ee,Y.0EX ME mRW50 ow-raw owerowo20 CROWN Iwo. or WI 55 a. am 693-256d927 50 PWCARE AREAS FOR mow WIWI.BROAD DE LISED TO LOOSEN SCAL, ruuw N GROW COVES WiwI0Owoo or 916 aE. law 0LYTCOIRE 6RBN05A1EOKWE056020X.:IK.n.Wvn 1050051PR Ex6PEwVE11 u0S1WEVICi�cun.n0LV0, smsSi ORA AREA BRC rorvw.WO15 WM W.wlamAG A RARE 0.w,5Vn05 OF REPOSE)ARON P.V.O.s0Ewx03012*uas.aro 4,,,,,x 4PEwgPEV,l�cwm,rtEUXVV Lm IF A"DETO TOW901 "�M WSW E1EA0AAW10 LARGE RE0001007LY 5105070.1E 11ER.L.r.Bu.E,11 b I5 OWATER 10410110E MMwCfb+TOTAL wx01W] C .Y DER. ei. Y1R OW 'BEN II.S)LPE OC CCAWAC505,21115OOF 05111Ec.V11,21210111E 051,190E519/H1402 N 1151552,121115 WE RAMS 61.22m16E10W0 YNREGx710000R.111ER[.ORE CTR0UIPEME011 ARE 31.22511110 Yw�111655 AM), IWO. 9Im OP 11.1105.2 KW BE 115.681205 CNO RIE MOW Ocv.V.w.p Ai WALLS W g1Rl_0 ALFm1101WW01WAX'ME BOTTOM W 51 TA27 MOOnmIOTOI09E.AOSONTLM9.W>BFCIESCWwoo woo,fwww AauwEw O.EnM wow,.woo Y&nL1 no TO WSW c NN AOF 9069E YronmwE69RAxEN.OE GRADE - W CASCARA mu. a 91 s 51/2571E09e IC0L.®e..WXIE6FOR rEWmEE5129 MEWS cowry COVER 353.3123.012 WRONG LOT 1102COCOVE V ORNATE WS IWO. WI iteass ass we 93 3EOEM O�n°W wows... � .wurwLCENTER ERa TWETom.suEVE PAW.. 0)mE..sm oWEPmEAlrourzOEmEwnnEln cxwsr. SVM0. WW051*0 IALE WYE B1E w9wM Y. Si oftwom ono sow so wow us wo or MAMIE irEs mom WEE To VIDEPAPOUHO E%ET 0353 u.NREOin�FRnRgME --- -. 'O ..GAL ME AS SRO. .wWS WIw PEPW FROM/REF LOAfR4T1001M RCS 9)I T.RCM ,CAYNM C1Y.1p5 wN1E MY)M[91F Y WTPEi¢eGV"W o 0 , w ,9.L WB PwM[W a m 1 dEOM, SO cNcpiEKEcpW 1XECEXRPOc 1)EInOW NME 9RWT WII MV ss w am wow YSr1Ee.W O.Rn .4.4 Ci4.,10mwXT.CAOTR1Y01C 25 DE151eE WWI E115T1196wan, TOTALS. essnsr EMY SEXOwE a —-- ¢ T- 11„1,4 x 1 1 .w1RTOT.W.W.SE • a,E9 0`"` :- — ., 1 B..,W,wEl..9BLWE S41111 25 i i a _- ---------- --------------- L-I vi, ....._ ._ 1 ,, , „....._, 84. ../7- -M11--- -------- ----tdS �•I / ` ` SUBMITTED FOR x i LAND USE REVIEW- �iYI•A I. NOTTRUCT d8 4I - / _ CONSTRUCTION a / ` T 1-f T--Trri_____ 11 FS&S BldgRenovation e fillit li %`—i J . rp.m.Onv0003 x a iinll girt( fit 35 '��� r79 ii \ "- ---• m` M c. 5555,611155210116 wl:1i T1AEu ProeRan- 2.0901 .+.w WWrew.'Y`1 mwALII11.:wn T9WSW ,��� IA0.05 I 1w0 RA.sR CA1•i 10ORW, 4}.RUMr 8°WW 99wX4TVNLL s A ,'=00 1 Tree Plan-Proposed 9s,ISARn9mY,-.m !June za,2020 o O O O o CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 9532 SW Ele P1e.. 152919921.OR 97219 503.75E-S5n FOP mwEPE ELEVATION a EMIR EAST SYE.SEE awn, sro wn avr.rn•w.7E3 En Ess ouooeoa4EA Ifl 95. A A SCUSCUPPER A KSwaw nwa c•n.ewaeimm ' ' 0 'I' .1i+'Fnu al _- - - - .tr.M..ml ..SPEssSAu __ _ -- ___ gdIUOww r iml 1 AE.nann • �j nnml .. 0F9MO p6•E.Il'Ell ' NCFT110104.41..••WI = M1 .. _ Y Sq was uwoaP,n �9atanP� r91M M0. ., irwn Maa 'n l,0.71 Dorm www.o TOP PAL r .s.wm.m.•mu• 552.53•a.SmE OWS mops,.mom. S.swm.A+.nSromSw ....a.nw Pro un...MR w,RV...a 1ru0 on,. GONG UM,BPME �. If rvu.Binnn 1 Building Elevation(East) O O T 0 O SUBMITTED FOR LAND USE REVIEW- NOT FOR • CONSTRUCTION FS&S Bldg Renovation WO,91.1.311e1C10 / _ .nanaErmEa -- Toss R OR uc•.r Steel 97223 ....1.1.115..9 .t_ _M *WALL LL I....W.I.., \NI � k hiW.1 swasswo wows M ▪waCt▪ es TTP .pri-FLA .37 RP Fri FL A/N•C.T 111111 .aCMYT1 e 440111E VYtl7R® g a 4 S=a.4wo„ a 1 BUILDING a 0.4C RawELEVATIONS 1 A0.06 2Building Elevation-Canopy(East) I tro=1-0' ,w. l June 29,2020 O O 'I' I CHRISTIE ARCHITECTURE 9532 SW ISIS Place PONa8.0R 9121E 503-156-6611 Yrt 20 W Pw0 EEV000 2,p,Mf6E.Pp leaVaee ,9PSRN w[.ro6lefew lee Ma en cwwrfraw mEP VIM,Flea Mee rtoPnmP rm,1E[oIa Ere CHM,TIP M Eneavw� Hahne wn rumPr Ix Cr irk - ....A._w7nanw . -- 1EINCYM1M.M 6eeee) NRMWN.XUOMLPVIE Mee eel MANE 16,,rt))a,NNM f4 Cw eel nx .l el N.Cow aul m. HCYYUM PaMP9raw GV pee,IYVJSiaw or mea,.. an Wawa esteem Men SIIwu ex,Se WARD e WC EUen Mee Vppallgy6,p P� I8x11E1 Cale Remo WAY. SnOe 0N.SEYOAI.ar$kor c Na0aw. IEVIpM6 1 Building Elevation(South) 2Building Elevation(North) SUBMITTED FORT. LAND USE REVIEW- NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FS&S Bldg Renovation ,In OFFICE 9howiw:NM0Fcx E%IENPI . Ny 1 MM.P4U0 ,q PaCf to PF.wRPan We Paean"CAP 8015 wnike,3bee1 :iraewuExouPEwllxoww»w -- o.WPaw SCUPPER ,Iv McNealTigard.OR MU Naw Ws°mom 1. r 0 ❑ mu (�u ■►1 NI n nn r7 ❑ ❑ �' M --'w=aE�W�R w IT M r,rs leyeen KW Cow rota Wu. i f BUILDING NS 1A0.07 46gilding Elevation(East) 3BoiMYng Elevation(West) lft-1.0 202 1 la I June29, 0 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette = FEMA Legend 122°45'52'W 45°25'56"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT g lir'- Without Base Flood Elevation(BFE) Zone A,V,499 SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth Zone E.Ao.AR,VC AR 1 Zone A 1HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway 1. r _ 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard,Area + of 1%annual chance flood with average '" F I . ,',. ., p•, l` ' depth less than one foot or with dralnag aIllp ey, '._" ' . I - r areas of less than one square mile zono i„+ �s Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard m„e x �` - N- �.. Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to .,.' , � - t s Levee.See Notes.zone x A a OTHER AREAS OF r X x x , , p'r • FLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezon,.e • E-9 ! 1�p NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zo,o r tti - Wi z k f I . -�. • • I I Effective LOMRs w OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard mn,- or vert, i STRUCTURES IIIIII1 Levee,eDike,l or Floodwalm Sewer l 417 yty Y. ` c, p•Z Cross Sections with 1%Annual Chance a ew 9 Y ° ft 17•s Water Surface Elevation II. I tv Of Tigard 4 - - Coastal Transect - ° 'r Aso ---• Base Flood Elevation Line(BFE) i- . ��Il�!(� "` # N Limit of Study is e �k. I. R1Y4 S1 Jurisdiction Boundary ---- — Coastal Transect Baseline 41U67 CA542E �' OTHER - — Profile Baseline N.44 e "E I `1 j2111(5 'k • ` FEATURES Hydrographic Feature 1 - J 1 °.. - ;, 0 Digital Data Available N a No Digital Data Available ' _ "fle , I - .' MAP PANELS ! Unmapped s V r, z r ° The pin displayed on the map is an approximate " ` point selected by the user and does not represe 'S r-. 1, ,'A - tip 4 an authoritative property location. 44 j ,r °f , ' i .... ' s This map compiles with FEMA's standards for the use of '' digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. itT �+ The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap G ' accuracy standards , ` The flood hazard Information Is derived directly from the HF Cn-OF M IIY IMAL FLOOD H f ro R C) authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA.This map /l, I Zone y( was exported on 7/28/2020 at 3:01 PM and does not ,� - reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and y T.. ' NV = time.The NFHL and effective information may change or 4t an become superseded by new data over time. -s . . . . ....... .......... .. ... ......................................... This map Image Is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear:basemap Imagery,flood zone labels( i . I ` ilei;I; FI'l 'e 4 legend,scale bar,map creation date,community identifiers, FIRM panel number,and FIRM effective date.Map images for Feet 1:6r000 122°45'15"W 95°25.31"N 1 V unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 regulatory purposes. CORRESPONDENCE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TIGARD City of Tigard June 24, 2020 Christie Architecture Attn: Lisa Christie 9532 SW 18th Place Portland, OR 97219 Project: Fred Shearer & Sons, Inc. Site: 8015 SW Hunziker Road;WCTM 2S101BD,Tax Lot 300 Land Use Files: MMD2020-00023 and SLR2020-00002 Dear Applicant: The City received the above refenced land use application on June 11,2020. Staff has evaluated your application for completeness against Tigard's submittal requirements, and determined that additional information is required. I. Completeness Items In order for your application to be deemed complete, please provide the following additional information: • The subject site partially contains a locally significant wetland, stream, and vegetated corridor. Additionally, the site is located in the FEMA special flood hazard area. Please provide information on the proposed amount of ground disturbances or landform alterations in cubic yards of material for this project. If more than 50 cubic yards of material are disturbed or altered for this project,then a Type III Sensitive Lands Review will be required (Please refer to Section 18.510.020.G of the Community Development Code of the City of Tigard). II. Re-submittal Requirements Please e-mail the requested information to Lina Smith, Assistant Planner at LinaCSnaxigard- or.gov. 13125 SW Hall Blvd. • Tigard, Oregon 97223 • 503.639.4171 TTY Relay: 503.684.2772 • www.tigard-or.gov Determination of Completeness Page 2 Land Use File MMD2020-00023 III. Completeness Options This letter contains the completeness review from all relevant City Departments. Please be advised that no further action will be taken on your application until one of the following events occurs: (1) you submit all completeness items, (2)you submit some completeness items and request that the City deem your application complete, or (3) you submit no completeness items and request that the City deem your application complete. Once your application is deemed complete, staff will review your application for approvability. IV. When Your Application Become Void Per ORS 227.178, your application will be void if one of the three actions listed above is not taken within 180 days of the date you submitted your application. The date on which your application would become void is December 8, 2020. Please be aware that application fees are non-refundable. If an application becomes void, the City may retain some or all of the related application deposits. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (503) 718-2438 or LinaCS@tigard-or.gov. Sincerely, Lina Smith Assistant Planner Copy: MMD2020-00023 and SLR2020-00002 Land Use Files